HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-05-12COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
May 6, 1976
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. lJ 2} 3} 5} 6} 7} & ll
WEDNESDAY, MAY 12, 1976} 7:30 P.M.
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
TI1e next regul.ar rnectiDg of the Boards cf Directors of County S:ini tation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, will
be held at the above hour and <late.
Scheduled Upcoming ~.1eeting~: -----------------
DISTRICT 11 ADJOUR~ED r~TG. --
u (/l/l
1
I (Jcretary
Monday, May 2•~, 1976, 7:00 p.m.,
Ilrn:tingto:-.. Beach Council Clian~bers
EXECUTIVE cmr.\llTTEE -Tuesday, June J, 1916, 5:30 p.m. (TPntative)
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
May 1 2 , 1976 -7:30 p.m.
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 71 4
540-2910
962-2411
The following i s a brief explanation of the more important ,
non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which
are not otherwise self-explanatory . Warrant lists are now en-
closed with the agenda material , summarizing bills paid since
the April Joint Board meeting .
Joint Bo ards
No. 9-a -Change Order No . 1 -Job No. PW-049 -New Water
We ll at Plant No . 1.
The contractor has requested an extension of time of 45
calendar days on his current contract because of an emergency
commitment. The staff recommends this change order for time
extension only, at no c ost to th e Districts, because the delays
will not affect the Districts ' requirements for the installation
of the water well at Pl ant No . 1.
No . 9~b -Addendum No. 1 to Job No . E-079 -Rehabilitation
of Rothrock Outfall Pumping Station .
This addendum was issued pursuant to requests by certain
equipment contractors regarding the torsional analysis which
was to be completed and made a part of the drive system to be
submitted at the 'time of the bid. Torsional information cannot
be developed until the successful bidder is named in order to
make the engines compatible with to-be-purchased gear and pump
eq uipment .
The staff recommends approval o f this addendum to the plans
and specifications for this job.
No. 9 -c -Consideration of Awa rd of Purchase Contract for
One (1) Outfall Eng ine, Job No . E-079 .
Bids were opened for this equipment on May 3, 1976. Three
bids were received, ranging in price from $76 ,318 to $99 ,250 .98 .
We therefore recommend award of a purchase contract to the
low bidder, Waukesha Engine Service, Inc., for one (1) engine
in the amount of $76,318 , and that we proceed , as previously
authorized, in the ne got iated purchase of the two (2) "used"
engine s from P&S Repair Service for $55,600 each , plus tax
($3,336) and fr eight (estimated at $1 ,10 0). ·Total price, in-
cluding tax and freight -$60,036 each .
No. 9-d -·Request for Approval of Directors' F ees and
Compen sation .
It is requested that the Joint Boards authorize payment of
compensation to the Joint Cha i rman and a Director for a tt endin g
meetings on behalf of the Distric ts as described in the agenda .
No. 9-e -Amendment to PERS Agreement .
Resolution No. 76-84 formalizes the action taken by the
Boards on April 14th, to depool from the PERS funding pool, and
provid es fo r one-year final compensation basis for r et irement ·
benefits. This action will reduc e the perc e n t age of Districts'
contrib ution to th e PERS and is consistent with the Districts '
objective of transferring to the Orange County Employees Retire-
ment System, which is presently under consideration. We have
just been advised by PERS that under our present situation, the
Distr icts ' contribution to PERS will be 11.51%. Depooling will
reduce the Districts contributi on effect ive J u ly 1st , to 7.96%,
which represents a savings of $37 ,870 for the corning year.
Districts Nos. 1 and 7
No . 9 -f -Desig n Fee for Raitt Street Trunk Sewer .
Pursuant to the District No. 1 Board 's authorization , the
staff has negotiated with Boyle Engineering Corporation for the
engineering design to be accomp l ished for the proposed Raitt Street
Trunk. The total estimated cost, includ ing construction engineer-
ing de sign, surveying, construction inspection, and incidental
costs is approximately $1 ~ million . We have negotiat ed a fee for
the proposed project of $65,900 , which does not include the field
survey services and construction staking . The necessary s urvey-
ing will be p e rforme d on a per diem b as is at t h e hourly rates
included in the engineering firm's proposal dated May 5th .
The cost of this facility will be shared by Districts Nos.
1 and 7 in accordance with the following:
District No . 1
District No. 7
95%
5%
It is the staff 's recommendation that the proposal of Boy l e
Engine e ring Corporation b e a ccepted.
-2-
, ('
District No. 2
No. 9-g -Proposed Annexation No . 15 -Request for Annexation
of Territory to Sanitation District No . 2.
Included with the agenda material is a l etter requesting
annex ation of 26.382 acres to Sanitation District No . 2 . The
action appearing on the agenda is to r efer t he matter to the
District's staff for study a nd recommendat ion.
District No. 3
No. 9-h -Se wer S ervice for La Habra ~eigh ts Area , Los Angeles
County.
The staff has had discussions with representatives of the City
of La Habra and the Los Angeles County Engineers ' office to con -.
sider possible sewer se r vice for unincorporated areas in Los Angeles
County tributary to the Santa Ana Basin . The waste treatment flows
fr om this area are minimal (1/4 mgd). It i s ant i cipated that a
3 -way agreement will be developed involving the City of La Habra ,
the County of Los Angeles and District No . 3 , However, because the
Districts ' flows are reaching existing treatment plant capacity and
the State and EPA have b ee n reluctant to auth orize construction of
additional capacities , actual c onnections may not be permitted for
some time to come . The action app e aring on the agenda receives
and files the County of Los Angeles request and refers it to the
staff for study and recommendation .
No. 9 -i -Stop Notice on Contract No. 3-20 -2 .
The Distr i cts have received a Stop Noti ce in the amount of
$585 against the ·Districts ' contractor .
District No . 5
No . 9 -j -Agreeme n t with the City of Newport Beach fo r
Collection of District Connection Fees .
We have received a request from th e Ci ty of Newport Beach to
amend the current agreement for collection of District connection
fees . The current agreement provides for a 5% administrative fee
payable to the City by the District upon invoicing , based on the
dollar amount of District connection fees coll ected by the City.
Th e ir Finance Direc tor wishes to deduct the 5% fee from t he month l y
r emittanc e , rather than invoicing the District separately . This
procedure is u sed in Districts 2 and 3 , and is currently proposed
to b e u sed in Distric t No . 7.
It is the staff's recommendat ion to approve the request of
Ne wport Beach .
-3-
District No. 7
No. 9-k -Ordering Annexation No. 42 ~ Tract No. 8640.
In October, 1974, the Board authorized the initiation of
annexation proceedings for Tract No. 8640 to annex approxi -
mately 23 acres in the vicinity of Skyline Drive and Plantero
Drive. The property will be divided into single-family resi -
dential l ots and the wastewater discharge wil l be consistent
with the flows anticipated by the Districts ' Master Plan . We
have now received Local Agency Formation Commission approval and
the proponent has paid the District's annexation fees. The staff
recomm ends adoption of Resolution No . 76 -86 -7, ordering annexation.
No. 9 -1 -Ordering Annexat i on No. 46 -Tracts 8799 and 8827 .
In March, 1975, the Board authorized init iation o f proceedings
t o annex 62.64 acres in the vicinity of Orange Park Acres Boulevard
and Chapman Avenue. The following special conditions were placed
on this annexation:
(1) That annexation fees for Tract No. 8827 (19+ acres)
would be due and payable prior to final approval
of Annexation No. 46 . The proponent was to
execute a note for the balance of the unpaid
annexation fees (based on approximately 42 acres
(Tract No . 8799) $41 ,460) and a Deed of Trust
with an Assignment of Rents to the District
to secure said note.
(2) Semi -annual payment of interest on said note at
the rate of 7% per annwn .
(3) Payment of unpaid District No. 7 annexation fees
in effect at the time the Tract No . 8799 map is
recorded, but in no event later than July 1 , 1977.
The District is in receipt of the annexation fees for Tract
No. 8827, the executed Promissory Note, and other necessary
documents, including approval of the Local Agency Formation Com-
mission . It is the staff 's recommendation that the Board formally
approve Annexation No . 46 in the City of Orange .
No . 9-m -Request for Annexation of Tract No . 8745 -Annexation
No. 54 .
Last month, the Board referred a request for annexation of
22 acres in the vicinity of Chapman Avenue and the proposed ex-
tension of Crawford Canyon Road to the staff for a recommendation .
The development p roposed meets the District low-density residential
-4-
crit eri a which has been established for this area in the District
Master Plan and the property is within the Ci ty of Orange . The
staff r ecommends that the Board adop t Resolution No. 76 -88 -7,
ini t iat in g annexation proceedings .
District No . 11
No. 9 -n -Change Order No . 2 to Contract No. ll-4R -Remodel
Newland-Hamilton Pumping Stat i on Facilities.
This change order adjusts the engineer 's quantities and grants
a time extension of 66 calendar days for material delays sustained
by the contractor. The adjustments of the engineer 's quantities
adds six lineal .feet to .the perimeter block wall at a total change
in the amount of $157 ,31. The staff recommend s acceptance of this
change order .
No. 9 -o -Accepting Contract No . ll -4R as Complete.
The contractor, Clifford L . Thompson Construction Company, has
completed the r emode ling of the Newland-Hamilton Pumping Station
facilities in accordance with the plans and specifications. This
contract was for the rehabilitation of the exterior of the pumping
facilities~ including landscaping, paving and perimeter block wall
to make the facilities more compatible with the existing develop -
ments in the area. Southern California Gas Company cooperated in
this project by paying fo~ work included in the contract which
affected their adjace nt facilities . Final a djusted contract price
for this project is $21 ,1 93 .26 which is well be l ow the budget amount
of $40,000 as authorized in this year's budget.
The staff recommends acceptance of the work and authorization
to file the NotiQe of Completion on this project .
All Districts
No. 11 -Report of the Executive Committee.
The Committee met on May 4th and enclosed for the Dir ectors
is a written report of their discussions and recommended i tems
for .cons id eration by the Boards.
No. 1 3 -Staff Progress Report on JPL-ACTS Pilot Plant Facility.
The staff wi ll make a slide presentation and briefly review
the status of this project, detailing some of the construction
procedures employed in constructing this 1 mgd facility in less
than six months.
-5-
Dist ric t No . 11
No . 28 -Adjournment to May 24th .
The staff i s recommending that the Board adjourn to 7 :00 p .m.,
Monday, May 24th , for the purpose of meeting jointly with the
Huntington Beach City Council in a workshop session to discuss the
proposed District Master P l an which is being prepared by Keit h and
Associates, consulting engineers to the District .
-6-
F red A . Harper
General Manager
·DISTRICTS 2,3,5,6 & 7
ITEMS ON
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA . ( 3)
\J\ \S
FILE
LETIER ............. .
A/C .... TKL R ... .
Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the
following cities regarding elections of mayors and appointment of
alternates, and seating new membe1s of the Boards: (*Mayor)
City
Anaheim
Cypress
Newport Beath
Placentia
Stanton
Villa Park
District(s )
2 & 3
3
5
5
6
7
2
3
2
Active
Miriam Kaywood
Alice J. MacLain*
Howard Rog e rs*
Donald Mcinnis
Paul Rycoff
Pete Barrett
Alternate
W. J . Thom*
Otto Lacayo
Ray Williams
Howard Rogers*
Howard Rogers*
Donald A. Holt\, Jr . George F. DeJesus*
Martha V. Weishaupt* Harry L. Miller
Donald Winn Harry F . Tipton*
II
~
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
Cou nty Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 81 27
of Orange County, California 10 844 Ell is Avenue
Fo unt a in Va ll ey, Calif., 92708
T elephones:
JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714
5 4 0 -2910
962-241 1
AGENDA
MEETI NG DATE
MAY 12J 1976 -7:30 P.M.
THE JOINT CHA I RMAN HAS RE QUESTED THAT ANY DI RECTOR
WITH A QUES TION ON CONSENT CALE NDAR ITEMS OR ANY
OT HER AGENDA ITEM PLEA SE CONTACT THE MANA GER OR
AP PROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD FOR FURTHER I NFOR MATIO N
PRIOR TO THE MEETING,
(1) Pledge of Al legiance and Invocation
(2) Roll Ca ll
(3) Consideration of motion to receive and f ile minute excerpts re seating of
new Director s . See supp l emen tal agen da
(4) EACH DIST RICT
Cons i derati on of motions approving mi nutes of the fol l owing meetings,
as mailed:
ti\\!> District 1 -Apri l 14, 1976 regu lar, and
April 21, 1976 adjourned
..._\ ~ District 2 -April 14, 1976, regul ar
~\S Dis t rict 3 -April 14, 1976, regul ar
ft\\.S. District 5 -April 14, 1976, regul ar .
It\\$ District 6 -April 14, 1976, regul ar
MIS District 7 -April 14, 1976, regul ar
r..t s District 11 -April 14, 1976, regu l ar
(5) EACH DISTRICT
Ann ual election of Chairmen and Chairmen pro t e rn of the Boards
(a) Distr ict 1 ~-\-~
(b) District 2 W~"4-~
(c) District 3 w~~~
(d) District s~~'\-..~
(e) District 6~---~
(f) District 7~~
(g) District 11 ~ ~ ~fUl....
(6) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary
FILE ......... (7) ALL DISTRICTS
LETIER ............•• Reports of:
A/C •••• TKLR .••• (a) Joint Chairman
·-··-·······-··-· ,_,, (b) General Manager --·-··----
(c) General Counsel
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims
ROLL CALL VOTE ....... _ ..... of the joint and individual Districts as follows (Each Director shall
be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each
District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote
differently for any District):
JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) "A" and "D"
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) "A" and "D"
DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE
DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B" and "E"
DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) "B" and "E"
DISTRICT NO. 5 See page(s) "E"
DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE
DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) "C" and "F"
DISTRICT NO. 11 See page(s) "C"
(9) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR
Roll C.fl Vote or Cast
Unanimous Ballot
ITEMS NOS. 9 (A) THROUGH 9 ( 0 )
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered
as not requiring discussion or further explanation and
unless any particular item is requested to be removed from
the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member
of the public in attendance, there will be no separate
discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar
will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the
consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar
shall be considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the
consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from
the consent calendar. h
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing
on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same.
-2-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
ALL DISTRICTS
FILE ···········-··-
LETTER ···-··-··-
A/C •••• TKLR ·-
· FILE ••••• t ......... .
..._~~?!_ER·-~).~: -~"
A/C ·--TKLR -·
·--~~::. ... '::. ... __
FILE ................ ..
LETTER ·······-··· ..
A/C •••• TKLR ·-·
..__.. .. _______ __
............_ ______ ...
FILE •••••••.•.••••••••
LETTER ·······-·····
A/C .... TKLR ••••
w~. ·',,,,,,.
(a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for New Water Well No. 1 at Plant
No. 1, Job No. PW-049, granting a time extension of 45
calendar days to the contract with McCalla Bros. in order
'to allow McCalla Bros. to complete an emergency commitment
to the Southern California Water Company. See page "G"
(b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Rehabilitation of Rothrock Outfall
Pumping Station, Plant No. 2, Huntington Beach, California,
Specification No. E-079
(c)
(d)
(e)
Consideration of Resolution No. 76-83, to receive and file bid
tabulation and recommendation, and ·awarding purchase contract
for one new, dual fuel, gas engine for Rehabilitation of
Rothrock Outfall Pumping Station, Plant No. 2, Huntington Beach
California, Specification No. E-079, to Waukesha Engine
Servicenter, Inc., in the amount 9f $76,318.00 including tax and
freight. See pages "H" and "I"
Consideration of motion ratifying attendance of Joint Chairman
Don Winn at a meeting with members of the State Water Resources
Control Board in connection with the proposed Committee of
Locally Elected Officials in Sacramento on February 18, 1976; and
ratifying attendance of Director Frances Wood at the National
Association of Regional Councils Water Quality Workshop relative
to 208 Planning, in Burlingame, California,-on May 5, 6 and 7,
1976, and authorizing compensation and reimbursement of expenses
in accordance with existing policies
Consideration of Public Employees Retirement System standard
Resolution No. 76-84, approving amendment to Retirement System
contract to depool from the State funding pool, and providing
one-year final compensation basis for retirement benefits
(Finalizes the Boards' declaration of intent on April 14, 1976,
Resolution No. 76-62.)
DISTRICTS 1 & 7
f1LE ---~········
LETTER .~t.\:.'C'
A/C .••. TKLR _
----............... ____ _
···-··-·····-··---
FlLE .•....• !:-::: ....••
LETTER ····-·-·-
A/C .... TKLR '
/
(f) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal
of Boyle Engineering Corporation, dated May 5, 1976, for
preparation of plans and specifications for Raitt Street Trunk
Sewer, for a lump sum fee of $ 65, 900. 00. See page "J"
DISTRICT 2
(g) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from
G. L. Lewis Company for annexation of approximately 26.382 acres
of territory to the District in the vicinity easterly of Mesa
Drive and Loma Street,. and refer-to staff __ for study. and ...... .
recommendation (Proposed Annexation No. 15 -Tract No. 8885 to
County Sanitation District No. 2). See page "K"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
FILE -··········-~---
LETTER ••••••••••••••
A/C ••• ~TKLR ..1.:
FILE ....•...•..•••..••
LETTER ············-
A/C .... TKLR ••••
'~ FILE •••••.•. ~ •••••
lEnER •······--·-
. AfC--= .. TKLR ••••
-·--·-···-······-
--··--···············
FILE ···········-··
.. LETTE~.'~.~-·-·
A/C .... TKLR ••••
.......... _ ... ____ .. _.,. _______ _
-----........................... .
FILE •••..•••..•.•••.•• .. -("
, l,ETTER ~.:.:Z··
A/C ___ TKlR ••••
FILE .....•.....•••.•••
LETTE!t •..•••• :.:.~:.' l. l't (
A/C •••• TKLR .•••
FILE ...•....••.•••••••
LETTER -··-·····-
A/C .... TKLR ·-
-·-········--·
DISTRICT 3
~ideration of motion to receive and file letter from ~ ~~~~ty of Los Angeles, Department of County Engineer,
dated April 26, 1976, requesting consideration of possible
sewage capacity in the District's system for the La Habra
Heights area, and refer to staff for study and recommendation
See page · "L"
(i) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice
submitted by Ray E. Molina, in the amount of $585.00,
against A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Co., contractor
for the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 7, Contract
No. 3-20-2
DISTRICT 5
(j) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-85-5, approving new Standard
Agreement for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges with the
City of Newport Beach, canceling similar agreement dated
September 15, 1972, and rescinding previous minute action re
payment of fees for such services. See page "M"
DISTRICT 7
(k) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-86-7, ordering
annexation of approximately 23.481 acres to the District in
the vicinity of Skyline Drive and Plantero Drive (Proposed
Annexation No. 42 -Tract No. 8640 to County Sanitation District
No. 7)
(1) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-87-7, ordering annexation
of approximately 62.64 acres to the District in the vicinity
of the northeast corner of Orange Park Acres and Chapman Avenue
(Proposed Annexation No. 46 -Tracts Nos. 8799 and 8827 to
County Sanitation District No. 7). See page "N"
(m) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-88-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 22 acres of
territory to the District in the vicinity of Chapman Avenue and
the proposed extension of Crawford Canyon Road (Proposed Annexation
No. 54 -Tract No. 8745 to County Sanitation District No. 7)
DISTRICT 11
(n) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the
plans and specifications to Remodel Newland-Hamilton Pumping
Station Facilities, Contract No. ll-4R, authorizing an adjustment
of engineer's quantities and a total addition of $157.31 to
to contract with Clifford L. Thompson Construction Company,
for additional block wall, and granting a time extension of
66 calendar days due to difficulty in obtaining required
materials.as specified. See page "0"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5)
-4-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4)
FILE ~-·········
LETTER~:..::':::
A/C .••. TKLR .•• ~S .. ~
DISTRICT 11 (Continued)
(o) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-89-11, accepting Contract
No. ll-4R, Remodel Newland-Hamilton Pumping Station Facilities ,
as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion;
and approv1ng Final Closeout Agreement. See page "P"
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items d e leted from consent calendar, if any
-5-
~
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
M\? Report of Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive
and file the Committee's written report
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive
Committee:
FILE .•...•.•..........
LETIER --~~)~·~-~~
A/C .... TKlR ••••
, 1,J ~ ... , I I ~ ..___-··-·············
Consideration of actions relative to adoption of proposed
Conflict of Interest Code:
(1)
M.\~
(2)
Consideration of motion to receive and file letter
from Districts' General Counsel, dated April 29, 1976,
re adoption of Conflict of Interest Code. See page "Q"
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Unanimous Billot
Consideration of Resolution No. 76-90, setting June 9, 1976,
at 7:30 p.m. at the Districts' administrative office as the
time and place of hearing on a proposed Conflict of Interest
Code, and directing the Secretary to give notice thereof. rv\~ See page "R"
(b) Consideration of actions relative to request of Garden Grove
Sanitary District for waiver of connection fees on Ranchero
Way and Ranchero Place:
@~::~@Consideration of motion to receive and file General
A/C .... TKLR ··-Counsel's opinion, dated May 5, 1976, relative to request
·······-··········-···-tt'l/&> of Garden Grove Sanitary District for waiver of connection
--······-··········-fees. See page "S"
(c)
Fl'..E -~-"'.':'._:, __ ,
Consideration of motion to respectfully deny request of
Garden Grove Sanitary District for waiver of connection
fees to serve 21 homes constructed in Garden Grove on
Ranchero Way and Ranchero Place based upon opinion and
recommendation of the General Counsel
Consideration of actions relative to amendment to agreement with
J. B. Gilbert and Associates for preparation of Environmental
Impact Statement:
LETIER •...........•• (1)
A/C •••. TKLR ••••
·--··-··············-f:I\ l ~ .
Consideration of motion to receive and file Environmental
Protection Agency memorandum, dated April 30, 1976, relative
to preparation of Environmental Impact Statement. See
page "T"
(2) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter of
J. B. Gilbert and Associates, dated April 15, 1976, relative
f\.\}~ to cost of additional work for preparation of Environmental
Impact Statement. See page "U"
:: ··~:··ijt::·c~:_ ~Consideration of Resolution No. 76-92, approving amendment
ER···
1-~---Ron Call~~ to agr~ement with J. B. Gilbert and Associates for prepa:a~i~n
A/C .... TKLR ···• unanimous Ballot of Environmental Impact Statement re Treatment Plant Fac1l1 ties ' . .::.:JA ... :~ .. ::·.:i1 · Plan, providing for an increase for said services on a per diem
.......................... fee basis from $60, 000 to $150, 000 plus printing costs not to
exceed $35,000, in form approved by the General Counsel, as
?rci~~e Environmental Protection Agency. See page ~-"_V_"~
(12) Continued on page 7
-6-
(12) (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-91, authorizing General
Manager and Joint Chairman to designate Directors to represent l'flE '"··"~"-:-tfon Call Vote or Cast
·eR ············-llnanimous Ballot the Districts on District business, and providing for compensation
and reimbursement of expenses incurred relating thereto. See C .••. TKL R -·· l'/\. ~
page 11 W" --~-·--
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
Staff progress report on J~~-ACTS Pilot Plant facility
FI LE •••••••••..•••••••
(14) ALL DISTRICTS LEITER .•..•.....•••• Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
A/c .... TKLR •••• (14)~Consideration of motion authorizing General Manager to designate one
···-····················· staff member to travel to Liberal, Kansas, to inspect and supervise
-·-······-rre);(n>N loading of two used, dual fuel, gas engines purchased pursuant to
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA Board authority on April 14, 1976; and authorizing reimbursement for
ff\\;;; travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred
@ -IJ,) '""-
(16) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn t'f·. ~ 7
(17) DISTRICT 2
(18)
FI LE ··-···-Q.~:.. .. -(19)
A/C ••.• TKLR ••••
(19)
ITEMS ON
-..S"'"O-PP""'trnmrAL AGEN DA
IV\\ 5
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
Other business and communications or supplemental ag e nda items, if any
~
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn '"till
DI STR ICT 3
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Carol Ann
Mestas,· dated April 19, 1976, in the amotint of $810 .39, in connection
with construction of the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 7,
Contract No. 3-20-2, and refer to the contractor and District's
liability insurance carrier for appropriate action
DISTRICT 3
of motion to adjourn <;:JI Consideration
agenda items , if any
DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adj ourn 91519
pplemental agenda ite ms, if any
DISTRICT 6
of motion to a djourn 9::J'/ Consideration
-7-
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Senitation Districts Post Office Box 8127
of Orange County, California 10844 Ell is Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
MEETING DATE
MAY 12J 1976 -7:30 P.M.
·THE JOINT CHAIRMAN HAS REQUESTED THAT ANY DIRECTOR
WITH A QUESTION ON CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS OR ANY
OTHER AGENDA ITEM PLEASE CONTACT THE MANAGER OR
APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
PRIOR TO THE MEETING.
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll Call
(3) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts re seating of
new Directors. See supplemental agenda
(4) EACH DISTRICT
(5)
(6)
Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings,
as mailed:
District 1 -April 14, 1976 regular, and
April 21, 1976 adjourned
District 2 -April 14, 1976, regular
District 3 -April 14, 1976, regular
District 5 -April 14, 1976, regular
District 6 -April 14, 1976, regular
District 7 -April 14, 1976, regular
District 11 -April 14, 1976, regular
EACH DISTRICT
Annual election of Chairmen and Chairmen pro tern of the Boards
(a) District 1
(b) District 2
(c) District 3
(d) District 5
(e) District 6
(f) District 7
(g) District 11
Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary
(7)
(8)
(9)
J\LL DISTRICTS
Reports of:
(a) Joint Chairman
(b) General Manager
(c) General Counsel
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims
of the joint and individual Districts as follows (Each Director shall
be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each
District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote
differently for any District):
JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) "A" and "D"
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) "A" and "D"
DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE
DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B" and "E"
DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) "B" and "E"
DISTRICT NO. 5 See page(s) "E"
DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE
DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) nc11 and "F"
DISTRICT NO. 11 Sec page(s) "C"
ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEMS NOS, 9 (A) THROUGH 9 ( 0 )
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered
as not requiring discussion or further explanation and
unless any particular item is requested to be removed from
the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member
of the public in attendance, there will be no separate
discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar
will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the
consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar
shall be considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the
consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from
the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing
on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same.
-2-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for New Water Well No. 1 at Plant
No. 1, Job No. PW-049, granting a time extension of 45
calendar days to the contract with McCalla Bros. in order
to allow McCalla Bros. to complete an emergency commitment
to the Southern California Water Company. See page "G"
(b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Rehabilitation of Rothrock Outfall
Pumping Station, Plant No. 2, Huntington Beach, California,
Specification No. E-079
(c) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-83, to receive and file bid
tabulation and recommendation, and ·awarding purchase contract
for one new, dual fuel, gas engine for Rehabilitation of
Rothrock Outfall Pumping Station, Plant No. 2, Huntington Beach
California, Specification No. E-079, to Waukesha Engine
Servicenter, Inc., in the amount 9f $76,318.00 including tax and
freight. See pages "H" and "I"
(d) Consideration of motion ratifying attendance of Joint Chairman
Don Winn at a meeting with members of the State Water Resources
Control Board in connection with the proposed Committee of
Locally Elected Officials in Sacramento on February 18, 1976; and
ratifying attendance of Director Frances Wood at the National
Association of Regional Councils Water Quality Workshop relative
to 208 Planning, in Burlingame, California, on May 5, 6 and 7,
1976, and authorizing compensation and reimbursement of expenses
in accordance with existing policies
(e)° Consideration of Public Employees Retirement System standard
Resolution No. 76-84, approving amendment to Retirement System
contract to depool from the State funding pool, and providing
one-year final compensation basis for retirement benefits
(Finalizes the Boards' declaration of intent on April 14, 1976,
Resolution No. 76-62.)
DISTRICTS 1 & 7
(f) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal
of Boyle Engineering Corporation, dated May 5, 1976, for
preparation of plans and specifications for Raitt Street Trunk
Sewer, for a lump sum fee of $ 65, 900. 00. See page "J"
DISTRICT 2
(g) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from
G. L. Lewis Company for annexation of approximately 26.382 acres
of territory to the District in the vicinity easterly of Mesa
Drive and Loma Street, and refer to staff for study and
recommendation (Proposed Annexation No. 15 -Tract No. 8885 to
County Sanitation District No. 2). See page "K"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
DISTRICT 3
(h) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from
County of Los Angeles, Department of County Engineer,
dated April 26, 1976, requesting consideration of possible
sewage capacity in the District's system for the La Habra
Heights area, and refer to staff for study and recommendation
See page "L"
(i) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice
submitted by Ray E. Molina, in the amount of $585.00,
against A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Co., contractor
for the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 7, Contract
No. 3-20-2
DISTRICT 5
(j) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-85-5, approving new Standard
Agreement for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges with the
City of Newport Beach, canceling similar agreement dated
September 15, 1972, and rescinding previous minute action re
payment of fees for such services. See page "M"
DISTRICT 7
(k) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-86-7, ordering
annexation of approximately 23.481 acres to the District in
the vicinity of Skyline Drive and Plantero Drive (Proposed
Annexation No. 42 -Tract No. 8640 to County Sanitation District
No. 7)
(1) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-87-7, ordering annexation
· of approximately 62.64 acres to the District in tte vicinity
of the northeast corner of Orange Park Acres and Chapman Avenue
(Proposed Annexation No. 46 -Tracts Nos. 8799 and 8827 to
County Sanitation District No. 7). See page "N"
(m) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-88-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 22 acres of
territory to the District in the vicinity of Chapman Avenue and
the proposed extension of Crawford Canyon Road (Proposed Annexation
No. 54 -Tract No. 8745 to County Sanitation District No. 7)
DISTRICT 11
(n) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the
plans and specifications to Remodel Newland-Hamilton Pumping
Station Facilities, Contract No. ll-4R, authorizing an adjustment
of engineer's quantities and a total addition of $157.31 to
to contract with Clifford L. Thompson Construction Company,
for additional block wall, and granting a time extension of
66 calendar days due to difficulty in obtaining required
materials as specified. See page "0"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5)
-4-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4)
DISTRICT 11 (Continued)
(o) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-89-11, accepting Contract
No. ll-4R, Remodel Newland-Hamilton Pumping Station Facilities,
as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion;
and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "P"
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
-5-
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Report of Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive
and file the Committee's written report
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive
Committee:
(a) Consideration of actions relative to adoption of proposed
Conflict of Interest Code:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter
from Districts' General Counsel, dated April 29, 1976,
re adoption of Conflict of Interest Code. See page "Q"
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-90, setting June 9, 1976,
at 7:30 p.m. at the Districts' administrative office as the
time and place of hearing on a proposed Conflict of Interest
Code, and directing the Secretary to give notice thereof.
See page "R"
(b) Consideration of actions relative to request of Garden Grove
Sanitary District for waiver of connection fees on Ranchero
Way and Ranchero Place:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file General
Counsel's opinion, dated May 5, 1976, relative to request
of Garden Grove Sanitary District for waiver of connection
fees. See page "S"
(2) Consideration of motion to respectfully deny request of
Garden Grove Sanitary District for waiver of connection
fees to serve 21 homes constructed in Garden Grove on
Ranchero Way and Ranchero Place based upon opinion and
recommendation of the General Counsel
(c) Consideration of actions relative to amendment to agreement with
J. B. Gilbert and Associates for preparation of Environmental
Impact Statement:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Environmental
Protection Agency memorandum, dated April 30, 1976, relative
to preparation of Environmental Impact Statement. See
page "T"
(2) Consideration of motion to receive nn<l file letter of
J. B. Gilbert and Associates, dated April 15, 1976, relative
to cost of additional work for preparation of Environmental
Impact Statement. See page "U"
(3) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-92, approving amendment
to agreement with J. B. Gilbert and Associates for preparation
of Environmental Impact Statement re Treatment Plant Facilities
Plan, providing for an increase for said services on a per diem
fee basis from $60,000 to $150,000 plus printing costs not to ~
exceed $35,000, in form approved by the General Counsel, as
requested by the Environmental Protection Agency. See page "V"
(12) Continued on page 7
-6-
{12) {d) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-91, authorizing General
Manager and Joint Chairman to designate Directors to represent
the Districts on District business, and providing for compensation
and reimbursement of expenses incurred relating thereto. See
page "W"
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
Staff progress report on JPL-ACTS Pilot Plant facility
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(15) . DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(16) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn
{17) DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
{18) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(19) DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(20) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(21) DISTRICT 5
Other business and communication·s or supplemental agenda i terns, if any
(22) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn
{23) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(24) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(25) DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(26) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(27) DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(28) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:00 p.m., May 24, 1976, at City
of Huntington Beach Council Chambers
-7-
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5 ,.6 & -;
JOINT BOARDS
SUPPLH~ENTAL AGENDA ITEMS
MAY 12J 1976 -7:30 P.M.
Post Office Box 8127·
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
(3) Cc~sid~ra~i~r. of notion to receive and file minute excerpts from the
fo2:o~in~ ~ities regar~ing elections of mayors and appointment of
al~er::aLes, and seating new members of the Boards: (*Mayor)
District(s)
A.-.. a.h e i::. 2 & 3
Cypre~s 3
Se·111-port Beach 5
5
6
7
Placentia 2
Stanton 3
Villa Park 2
ALL DISTRICTS
Active
Miriam Kaywood
Alice J. MacLain*
Howard Rogers*
Donald Mclnnis
Paul Rycof f
Pete Barrett
Donald A. Holts, Jr.
Martha V. Weishaupt*
Donald Winn
Alternate
W. J. Thom*
Otto Lacayo
Ray Williams
Howard Rogers*
Howard Rogers*
George F. DeJesus*
Harry L. Miller
Harry F. Tipton*
(14) Consideration of motion authorizing General Manager to designate one
staff member to travel to Liberal, Kansas, to inspect and supervise
loading of two used, dual fuel, gas engines purchased pursuant to
Board authority on April 14, 1976; and authorizing reimbursement for
travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred
DISTRICT 3
(19) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Carol Ann
Mestas, dated April 19, 1976, in the amount of $810.39, in connection
with construction of the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 7,
Contract No. 3-20-2, a.nd refer to the contractor and District's
liability insurance carrier for appropriate action
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
MAY 12J 1976·-7:30 P~M.
WARRANT NO.
29338
·~9339
29340
29341
29342
29343
29344
29345
29346
29347
29348
29349
29350
29351
29352
29353
29354
29355
29356
29357
29358
29359
29360
29361
29362
29363
293.64
29365
29366
29367
29368
29369
29370
29371
29455
29374
29375
29376
29377
29378
29379
29380
29381
29382
29383
29384
29385
29386
29387
29388
29389
~ 29390
29391
29392
29393
29394
"A-1 11
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID J\PRIL 15, 1976
~JOINT OPERJ\TING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Air California, Air Fare, Various Meetings
All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings, Hose & V-Belts
American Compressor Company, Gaskets & Compressor Parts
American Lock & Supply, Inc., Hardware
City of Anaheim, Power
Bank of America, Bond & Coupon Collection
Barnes & Delancy, Couplings
Brown-West Corporation, Janitorial Supplies
Cal's Cameras, Photo Processing & Supplies
Certified Laboratories, First Aid Supplies
Clark Dye Hardware, Tools
Coast Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware
Consolidated Electrical Distbrs., Electric Supplies
Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine
Control Parts Distributors, Inc., Electric Supplies
Leelon Cory, Employee Mileage
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
County Wholesale Electric, Electric Supplies
Crane Veyor Corporation, Cable
Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage
Daniels Tire Service, Tire Repair
Deckert Surgical Company, First -Aid Supplies
Diamond-Newport Ice Company, Sampling Supplies
Dominguez Marine & Industrial, Pipe Supplies
Edmond Scientific Company, Tools
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring
Envirotech-Sparling, Clarifier Parts
Filter Supply Co., Filters
Fisher Controls Company, Regulator Parts
Fox Electric Motors, Motor Repair
Compressor Products Division, Compressor Repair
Edward R. Francis, J-6-1 & Pl-16 Inspection Travel Expense
Fredson, Equipment Parts
City of Fullerton, Water
General Electric Supply, Electric Supplies
General Telephone Company
Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage
Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Grit Removal
Graybar Electric Company, Electric Supplies
Harrington Industrial Plastics, Pipe Supplies
Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal
L. Heitman Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Rental
Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease
Hilti Fastening Systems, Hardware
Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires
Howard Supply Company, Hose & Pipe Supplies
City of Huntington Beach, Water
Huntington Auto Service, Truck Towing
Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Equipment Rental
Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware
Johnson Control Valve Company, Valve Parts
Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supplies
Kelco Sales & Engineering Co., Comprssor Parts
King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, Seals & Couplings
Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts
Knox Industrial Supp lies, Hardware
AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
$ 53.90
360.01
3,788.36
325.21
130.60
83.05
85.82
281. 23
163.63
57.71
12.19
48.01
222.24
3,097.10
817.68
6.00
286.39
794.97
123.29
10.05
63.63
6.89
15.90
24.03
54.90
3,000.00
109.43
23.20
304.40
83.94
83.12
647 .11
20.31
6.26
192.16
1,314.14
84.06
1,350.00
661. 76
10.66
140.00
420.00
743.51
80.00
43 .17
1,067.95
19.55
23.50
252.85
172. 28
307.63
171. 33
486.93
222.68
303.18
9.78
"A-1"
WARRANT NO.
JOINT DIS1RICTS CLAIMS PAlD APRIL 15, 1976
IN FAVOR OF
29395
29396
29397
29398
29399
29400
29401
29402
29403
29404
29405
29406
29407
29408
29410
29411
29412
29413
29414
29415
29416
29417
29418
29419
29420
29421
29422
29423
29424
29425
29426
29427
29428
29429
29430
29431
29432
29433
29434
29435
29436
29437
29438
29439
29440
29441
29456
29457
29444
29445
29446
29447
29448
29449
29450
29451
29452
29453
"A--2"
L ft N Uniforms Supply Company, Uni form Service
C. R. Laurence Company, Inc., Building Materials
Judy Lee, Employee Mileage
McCoy Ford Tractor, Equipment Parts
McFarland Partitions, Relocate Temporary Partitions
Marko Foam Products, Insulation
Master Blueprint & Supply, Printing
Metals and Plastics Publications, Technical Manuals
Metropolitan Supply Co., Filters
Mitchell Manuals, Inc., Technical Manuals
Moore Systems, Inc., Circuit Board
E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers
Motorola, Inc., Maintenance Agreement
Orange County Stamp Company, Rubber Stamps
Orange Valve & Fitting Company, Pipe Supplies
Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies
Pacific Telephone Company
M. C. Patten Corporation, Gauges
Postmaster, Postage
Pyramid Fence Company, Fencing
Qua.Ii ty Building Supply, Building Materials
Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal
The Republic Supply Company, Pipe Supplies
Robbins & Myers, Freight
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Repair & Rewind Motor
Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies
Scientific Products, Lab Supplies
City of Seal Beach, Water
Sears, Roebuck and Company, Touls
Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Supplies
John Sigler, Employee Mileage
Southeast Janitorial Service, Janitorial Service
Southern California Edison Company
South Orange Supply, Pipe Supplies
Southern California Gas Company
Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Standard Oil Company of California, Gasoline & Diesel Fuel
State Compensation Insurance Fund, 3rd Quarter Premium
Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage
Taylor-Dunn, Equipment Parts
39 Stake & Building Supplies, Survey Supplies
Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts & Tools
United Parcel Service, Freight-Out
United Reprographics, Inc., Printing
United States Elevator Corp., Maintenance Agreement
University of Calif., Irvine Regents, JPL Computer Model
Van Waters & Rogers, Chemicals
VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies
Varec, Inc., Valves & Manhole Covers
Paul Vukich, Employee Mileage
Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage
Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage
John R. Waples, R. S., Odor Consultant
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts
Western Electronic Supply Corporation, Electric Supplies
Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage
Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing
Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Services
AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
926.13
11. 93
21.00
133.81 '-"'
749.00
44.74
73.03
57.50
193.10
14. 72
1S9.74
149.14
3,167.91
74.48
13.84
248.16
443.50
239.72
500.00
392.00
834.39
64.00
142.36
50.78
314 .10
61.94
4.87
81. SS
20.83
599.00
48.66
39S.OO
43,984.45
211. 73
1,508.83
198.37
1,046.69
12,025.00
40.14
140.77
344.65
216.48
81.84
33.S2
33.00
242.00
2,142.49
45.20
1,303.80
13.SS
62.82
34.50
220.40
25.65 ~
179.67
15.75
3,688.15
63.60
$101,401.66
"A-2"
WARRANT NO.
29324
~9325
~9326
29327
29328
29329
29330
29331
29332
29333
29334
29335
29336
29337
"A-3"
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID APRIL 15, 1976
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Belmont Engineering, JPL Equipment
John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Services, JPL ACTS & Fae. Plan
Donovan Construction Company, Contractor Pl-16
E & G Contractors, Contractor PW-046
Eastman, Inc., File Cabinets
J. Putnam Henck, Contractor, JPL-ACTS
Neptune Microfloc, Inc., JPL Equipment
Tom Ponton Industries, Inc., Tools
C. E. Raymond-Bartlett-Snow, Freight for JPL Equipment
The Register, Bid Notice, P2-8-8
Taylor-Dunn, Electric Carts
Taylor Instruments, JPL Equipment
Travel Buffs, JPL Inspection Travel Expense
Twining Laboratories, Pipe Testing Pl-16
TOTAL CORF
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF
AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
44,219.04
15,753.65
766,400.89
11, 560. so
254.40
274,512.89
23,722.40
1,131.38
1,250.20
103.68
9,378.88
6,641.10
312.00
70.00
$1,155,311.01
$1,256,712.67
"A-3"
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID APRIL IS, 1976
DISTRICT NO. 2
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
29310 John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contractor 2-14-3
29311 Vido Artukovich, Contractor 2-16-2
29312 J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation, Contractor 2-15
29313 Kasler Corp., & L.H. Woods, JV.~ Contractor 2-14-4
29314 Long Beach Iron Works, Inc., Contractor 2-14-3, 2-14-4
29315 S. S. Zarubica, Contractor 2-14-5
DISTRICT NO. 3
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
29316 Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 3-20-1, 3-20-2
3-21-1
29317 Orange County Flood Control District, Anaheim Barber Channel Sewer
Relocation
29318 The Register, Bid Notice 3-21-2
29319 A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Saliba Co., Contractor 3-20-3 & 3-21-1
nB" AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
$ 220,034.70
226,875.82
53,474.90
788,942.25
6,000.66
238,913.28
$ 1,534,241.61
$ 8,371.30
5,000.00
103.05
317,850.81
$ 331,325.16
"B"
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAiMS PAID APRIL 15, 1976
DISTRICT NO. 7
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
29320 Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 7-6-8
29321 Steve Bubalo Construction Company, Contractor 7-6-8
29322 Southen1 Pacific Transporation Company, Eastements 7-6-7
DISTRICT NO. 11
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
29323 Clifford L. Thompson Construction Company, Contractor 11-4R
II C" AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
$ 1,810.00
123,156.00
43,086.25
$ 168,052.25
$ 3,670.54
II C"
·wARRANT NO.
29479
29480
29481
29482
29483
29484
29485
29486
29487
29488
29489
29490
29491
29492
29493
29494
29495
29496
29497
-29493
29499
29500
29501
29502
29503
29504
29505
29506
29507
29508
29509
29510
29511
29512
29513
29514
29515
29516
29517
29518
29519
29520
29521
29522
29523
29524
29525
29526
29527
29528
29529
29530
29531
29532
"D-1"
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID APRIL 27, 1976
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
A & W Electric Motors, Motor Parts
Advance Electric, Electric Motor
Air California, Air Fare, Various Meetings
Allied Pipe & Supply, Inc., Pipe Supplies
Aljac Supply Company, Tools
American Cyanamid Company, Chemicals
The Anchor Packing Co. , Pwnp Packing
Applied Science Labs., Inc., Lab Supplies
Banning Battery Company, Batteries
Barksdale Controls Division, Switches
John G. Bell Co., Valves
Bell Pipe & Supply Company, Controls
Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Magneto Repair & Parts
Burke Engineering Company, Controls
Cal's Cameras, Photo Processing & Supplies
Leonard Carney, OVPCA Conference Expenses
Case Power & Equipment, Equipment Parts
William N. Clarke, CWPCA Conference Expenses
College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials
Consolidated Electrical Distbrs., Electric Supplies
Continental Chemical Co., Chlorine
Mr. Crane, Crane Rental
Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplies
C. R. Davis Supply Co., Pipe Supplies
John M. Deck, Equipment Parts
Derby's Topsoil, Paving Materials
Nick Di Benedetto, CWPCA Conference Expenses
Dominguez Marine & Industrial, Hardware
The Drawing Board, Inc., Office Supplies
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies
Essick Machinery Co., Compressor
Fisher Controls Company, Compressor Parts
Clifford A. Forkert, Right-of-Way Services .
Compressor Products Division, Compressor Repair & Parts
Fullerton Tire Company, Truck Tires
General Telephone Company
Hewlett Packard, Lab Supplies
Honeywell, Inc., Metering Supplies
Howard Supply Company, Valves & Pipe Supplies
Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware
International Business Machines, Office-Supplies
. Irvine Ranch Wat'dr District, Water
Johnson Control Valve Co., Valves
Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supplies
King Bearing, Inc., Chain, Seals & V-Belts
Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tools & Hardware
L & N Uniforms Supply Co., Uniform Service
Lawless Detroit Diesel, Engine Parts
Master Blueprint & Supply, Drafting Supplies
Metal Finishing, Technical Journals
Metropolitan Supply Co., Gauges
Morgan Equipment Company, Equipn1ent Parts
Motorola, Inc., Maintenance Agreement
AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
$ 24.02
110
323~
605.00
43.52
5,039.84
249.33
129.20
171. 23
469.80
1,453.26
154.78
424.47
52.80
299.88
97.51
211. 42
128.80
167.31
1,291.89
. 4 ,645. 65
426.00
40.00
487.60
25.46
318.00
83.62
23.98
38.01
46.03
593.39
42.10
2,571.30
487.42
238. 71
1,951.40
47.70
127.51
689.74
126.26
132.42
1. 75
72.06
105.10
25.14
493.68
401.11
1,313.95
77. 93
81.78
lo.on
53.~~
310.91
266.36
"D-1"
WARRANT NO.
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID APRIL 27, 1976
IN FAVOR OF
29533
29534
29535
29536
29537
29538
29539
29540
29541
29542
29543
29544
29545
29546
29547
29548
29549
29550
29551
29552
29553
29554
29555
29556
29557
29558
29559
29560
29561
29562
29563
29564
29565
29566
29567
29568
29569
29570
29571
29572
29573
29574
29575
29576
29577
29578
29579
29580
"D-2"
National Chemsearch Co., Cleaner
National Lumber Supply, Building Materials, Tools & Hardware
Newark Electronics, Electric Supplies
Delbert Newby, Cesspool Pumping Reimbursement
Occidental College, Ecology Trawl
Orange County Chemical Co., Chemicals
Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies &.Equipment Rental
Pennwalt Corporation, Cleaner
Perkin-Elmer, Lab Supplies
Radio Products Sales, Inc., Metering Supplies
The Register, Employment Ad & Bid Notice 3-8R-l
The Republic Supply Co., Pipe Supplies
· Ryan Herco, Pipe Supplies
Santa Ana Blue Print Co., JPL Printing
Sargent-Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies
Sears, Roebuck and Co., Tools
See Optics, Safety Glasses
Sims Industrial Supply, Hardware
Society of Engineers, Pollution Conference
Southern California Edison Company
So. Cal Sign Company, Signs
South Orange Supply, Pipe Supplies
Southern California Gas Company
Southern California Water Company
Sparkletts Drinking Water Corporation, Bottled Water
Speed-E-Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Standard Concrete Material, Concrete
SLandard Oil Company of Calif., Oil, Diesel Fuel & Gasoline
The Suppliers, Chain & Tools
TI1ermo-Pak Boilers, Inc., Boiler Parts
John D. Thomas, CWPCA Conference Expenses
C. O. Thompson Petroleum Co., Kerosene
Titan Plastic Supply, Pipe Supplies
Travel Buffs, Air Fare, Various Meetings & JPL Insp. Travel Exp •.
Truck & Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts
Union Oil Company of Calif., Gasoline
United Parcel Service, Freight-Out
Al Ursic, Employee Mileage
Utilities Supply Company, Hardware
VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies
Varec, Inc., Freight
Victor Comptometer Corporation·; Employee Training
Warren and Bailey Co., Inc., Valves
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts
Bruce E. Witcher, CWPCA Conference Expenses
John M. Wright, Employee Mileage
Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Services
Donald Winn, CWPCA Conference Expenses
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING
AGENDA ITEM f8 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
AMOUNT
373.12
183.78
120.78
45.00
400.00
87.45
601. 74
168.31
165.24
38.82
143.90
351.79
78.70
6.36
404.41
815.36
15.80
85.22
45.00
4,163.58
117 .40
861. 64
1,288.78
3.00
201. 71
111. 62
331.73
1,069.25
528 .11
212.34
146.66
76.72
579.61
545.00
526.92
60. 33 .
34.40
3.75
24.65
1,064.01
17.93
53.00
337.50
171. 07
156.60
22.50
1,779.73
157.35
$ 46,581.40
"D-2"
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID APRIL 27, 1976
WARRANT NO~
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
29472
29473
29474
29475
29476
29477
29478
"D-3"
Baum lt Associates, Prelirn. Design, Admin. Building
Eastman, Inc., File Cabinet
Garrett Industrial Supply Co., Cabinet
J. B. Gilbert & Associates, Fae. Plan & P2-23 EIR
Pepsi Co Bldg. Systems, Inc., JPL Office Rent
Rockwell International, Calculator
The Suppliers, Tools
TOTAL CORF
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF
AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
$ 198.
109.~
196.91
5, 671. 64
191. 86
216.24
2-01.40
$ .6,785.36
$ 53,366.76
"D-3"
\RRANT NO.
29466
29467
29468
29469
II E"
·,
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAIP APRIL 27, 1976
DISTRICT NO. 2
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
County of Orange, Compaction Testing 2-14-4
Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 2-14-4
DISTRICT NO. 3
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 3-20-2
DISTRICT NO. 5
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
City of Newport Beach, Connection Administration
AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
$ 402.34
6,500.00
$ 6,902.34
$ 26.00
$ 1,449.50
"E II
WARRANT NO.
29470
29471
II F II
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID APRIL 27, 1976
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
State of California, Annexation #42 Processing Fee
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing, 7-6-8
AGENDA ITEM f8 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
AMOUN.r
'-"
$ 180.00
208.00
$ 388.00
II F"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.· O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
COlfTRAC TOR: McCall a Bros. DATE May 12, 1976
------------------~~~-------
JOB: New Water Well at Plant No. 1 -Job No. PW-049
--~--~--~~~~~~~~~--~-------~~~~----~--~~~------~~------~~--~----
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 0. 00
In accordance with contract provision~, the following changes in the contract and/or
contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby appr~ved.
Reference: Contractor's letter dated April 12, 1976
Extension of time of 45 calendar days because of an emergency
commitment requested by the president of Southern California
Water Company as ·a result of the Water Company's recent acquisition
for water works facilities previously owned by California Ci ties
Water Company in the San Bernardino area. Contractor could·not
commit to both the Districts' work and to this emergency situation
concurrently. Delay in conunencing Districts' work will not· result in
any hardship for Districts. Contractor is hereby granted an
extension of contract time 45 calendar days
Summary of Contract Time
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
March 25, 1976
120 calendar days
July 23, 1976
Time Extension this Change Order
Total Time Extension
45 calendar days
45 calendar days
165 calendar days
September 6, 1976
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT)
Amended Contract Price
Board authorization date: May 12, 1976 Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION
$ 42,046.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 42,046.00
DISTRICTS OF
Orunge County, California
s,.......
--------------~--~-~~-----~~~--Associate Engirieer
3y
--~---~~--~~-------------~~~---
By
------~----------~--~~~~~~ Chief Engineer
Contructor
II G II AGENDA ITEM #9CA) -ALL DISTRICTS "G II
·,
RESOLUTION NO. 76-83
AWARDING PURCHASE CONTRACT FOR ONE GAS ENGINE
FOR REJIABILlTATION OF ROTHROCK OUTFALL PUMPING
STATION, SPECIFICATION NO. E-079
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AWARDING PURCHASE CONTRACT FOR ONE NEW, DUAL
FUEL, GAS ENGINE FOR REHABILITATION OF ROTH-
ROCK OUTFALL PUMPING STATION, PLANT NO. 2,
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SPECIFICATION
NO. E-079
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written reconunendation this day submitted to the
Boards of Directors by the Superintendent that award of purchase contract be
made to Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc. for one new, dual fuel, gas engine
for Rehabilitation of Rothrock Outfall Pumping Station, Plant No. 2, Huntington
Beach, California, Specification No. E-079, and the bid tabulation and proposal
submitted for said specification, are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That said contract for Specification No. E-079 be awarded to
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc. in the amount of $76,318.00 for one new, dual
fuel, gas engine furnished and delivered, in accordance with the terms and
conditions of said specification and the bid proposal therefor; and,
Section 3. TI1at the Chairman and the Secretary of County Sanitation
District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute a purchase contract
with Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc. for said equipment, in form approved by
the General counsel; and,
Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected,
and that all bid bonds be ordered returned to the unsuccessful bidders.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1976.
II H II AGENDA ITEM #9Cc) -ALL DISTRICTS II H II
II I II
Encinccr's Estimate: $231,000.00
BID TABULATION
SHEET
. Date May 3, 1976 -11:00 A.M •
Contract For: . REHABILITATION OF ·RoTimOCK OITTFALL PUMPING STATION
PLANT NO. 2, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA
1.
2.
3.
4.
ENGINE SECfION (Equipment Purchase Only)
JOB NO. E-079
CONTRACTOR UNIT PRICE TOTAL BID
Waukesha {l) $ 76,318.00 $ 76,318.00
Model No. 7047G (2) 73,049.50 146,099.00
(3) 73,049.666 219,149.00
White Superior *(l) $ 80,172.00+$4,810.32 (tax) $ 84,982.32
Model No. 8G825 * (2) 80,172.00+$4,810.32 (tax) 169,964.64
* (3) 80,172.00+$4,810.32 (tax) 254,946.96
White Superior * (1) $ 93,633.00+$5,617.98 (tax) $ 99,250.98
Model No. 40GDX6 * (2) 93,633.00+$5,617.98 (tax) 198, SOI. 96
* (3) 93,633.00+$5,617.98 (tax) 297,752.94
Delaval Engines NO BID (Engines no longer in production)
*White Superior neglected to include necessary sales tax at 6% in their
bid so it" has been added thereto in this bid tabulation.
It is recommended that the award be made to Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc.
of £ompton, California for ONE Waukesha Model 7042G engine for the total price
of $76,318.00 as the lowest and best bid. ·
~· ~.Cl~rke, S~perintendent
AGENDA ITEM #9(c) -ALL DISTRICTS II I "
BDLJ/e EnC]ineerfnCJ Corporation
Board of Directors
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1
OF ORANGE COUNTY
Attention Mr. Fred A. Harper, Genera I Manager
P. 0. Box 1728
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Raitt Street Trunk
May 5, 1976
Pursuant to Mr. Lewis' request, we are pleased to submit our proposal for furnishing pro-
fessional engineering services for the preparation of final plans and specifications for the
subject project as set forth in the engineer1s report dated November 1969.
The Raitt Street Trunk is part of the original master plan of trunk sewer facilities adopted
in NovemL~.-1969. It is ·i·:ae las!· rE:rnui11i11g trunk sewer f·o be built and, when placed in
operation, the master plan will have been completed. This trunk will relieve the existing
Greenville-Sullivan Trunk, which presently sewers the westerly half of the city of Santa
Ana that lies within District No. 1. It will discharge into the Sunflower interceptor,
which is jointly owned by Districts Nos. 1 and 7. It wi II also sewer approximately 143
acres in District No. 7 between Sunflower and Alton. Flow from this area wi 11 account
for 5 percent of the capacity in this reach, thus District No. 7 will be obligated for
5 percent of the project costs in this reach.
The trunk begins at Sunflower Avenue and will extend northerly along the proposed align-
ment of Raitt Street between Sunflower A'1enue and Alton Avenue, and then continue
northerly in Raitt Street to Myrtle Street where it will intercept the Myrtle Street Trunk
which present I y discharges to the Greenville-Su II ivan Trunk. Tota I length of the Raitt
Street Trunk is approximately 3-1/4 miles with pipe sizes varying from 30 inches down
to 24 inches. The total e3timated cost, including construction, engineering, design sur-
veying, construction inspection, coi1struction staking, in-plant inspection, right-of-way
acquisition, if required, and legal, administration, and incidental costs, is $1,550,000.
We will provide the following professional engineering services for the project.
1. Make arrangements for and coordinate field surveys, gather bench-mark data,
existing surveys, etc. If pavement coring is required for final design, make arrange-
ments for outside services.
"J-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(F) -DISTRICTS 1 & 7 "J-1"
County Sanitation District No. 1
of Orange County -2-IW:Jy 5, 1976
2. Research underground uti I ity records; includes both field and office contacts with
public and municipal utility companies.
3. As required to avoid conflicts between proposed project work and existing utilities,
. make arrangements for exploratory holes to expose existing utilities for position and
elevation. Obtain excavation permits. Solicit proposals from contractors if district
forces are not available for exploratory work. Contact city and state inspection
departments •. lvbrk and survey exposed utilities.
4. Prepare engineering data for regulatory permit applications that may be required by
the cities of Santa Ana and Costa Mesa, Orange County Flood Control District,
Southern Pacific Railroad Company, and State Division of lndustria I Safety for gas
classifications on jacked casing and tunnels.
5. Make a general foundation investigation, and report. Secure district staff approval
of soi Is engineer.
6. Prepare detailed plans and specifications.
7. Review pre! iminary and fina I plans and specifications with cities of Santa Ana and
Costa Mesa and the Orange County Flood Control District. Receive traffic control,
detour, and pavement replacement requirements.
8. Process railway undercrossing through Southern Pacific Railroad Company.
9. Process final plans through utility comp:rnies.
10. Process storm channel undercrossings through Orange County Flood Control District.
11. Prepare estimates of quantities and costs.
12. Deliver original tracings of plans and reproducible plates of the specifications for
the district's use in prep:Jring the necessary number of copies for record purposes
and distribution to prospective bidders, etc.
13. Prepare legal descriptions and plats fur right-of-way acquisitions as required for
facility location and construction. Work with appraiser and attorney in right-of-
way matters.
14. Furnish district staff data for preparation of environmental impact report.
15. Assist the district in securing bids, in the tabulation and analysis of bid results,
and in letting the contract.
"J-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(F) -DISTRICTS 1 & 7 "J-2"
County Sanitation District No. 1
of Orange County -3-May 5, 1976 ~
16. Attend pre-award ·conferences with contractor, district staff, and the cities of
Santo Ana and Costa Mesa.
17. Check shop and working drawings as may be submitted by the contractor.
18. · Review laboratory reports on material tests and inspection and correlate such
reports with the intention of the plans and specifications.
19. Furnish consultation and advice to the district or its agent during construction.
20. IY.ake a fine I inspection and report of the completed project with a representative
of the district or its agent.
21. Prepare record drawings when construction work has been completed and accepted
by the district. This shall mean the original tracings of the plans will be modified
if necessary because of deviations from the original work. Since the district will
carry out inspection of the project, modifications to the original tracings will be
based upon information supplied to the engineer by the district. The original
tracin9~, ~ftcr modificat!on, \viii become district property.
"J-3"
Our to ta I fee for the proposed project is $65, 900. It is suggested that payment be monthly
on a percentage-complete basis up to 90 percent at time of delivery of plans and specifi-
cations, with 100 percent payment when the work is completed and accepted by the district.
Field surveys.will be required in order to prepare the plans and specific:itions. These sur-
veys will include taking top~graphy and culture within the project limits. We propose that
all field surveys necessary for design be performed on a per diem basis at the following
hourly rates: (1) three-man survey party -$66/hour, (2) two-man survey party -$48/hour,
and (3) licensed surveyor -$29/hour. Payment is to be monthly as invoiced. If construc-
tion staking is requested, these rates will remain in effect until June 30, 1977, at which
time they wou Id be subject to rev is ion.
We propose that a II outside services required and approved by the district, such as pavement
coring, plant inspection for quality control, and materials used on the project construction,
be paid directly by the district upon presentation of a statement for such outside services
with the engineer's certification.
lfwe are authorized to proceed with this work at the May 12, 1976, board meeting, we
can have plans and specifications ready for advertising of bids in August 1976.
BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION
{ 1;,,_ !//!'; /1./-(s,{.;;:/~-::,J
/ , .
Conrad Hohener, Jr., PE
Vice President
AGENDA ITEM #9(F) -DISTRICTS 1 & 7 "J-3"
MCHUGH -NORRIS, INC.
CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS
17281 Irvine Boulevard, Suite 312. Tustn Calif. 82680 (714) 544-6710
Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 2
of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Attention: Mr. Sylvestor
April 23, 1976
Subject: Tract 8885, City of Orange
Gentlemen:
On behalf of the owner of the subject tract, the G. L. Lewis Company,
we hereby request that said tract be annexed to County Sanitation District
No. 2 of Orange County.
The legal description with area and boundary map are attached.
The owner of all of the land is:
G. L. Lewis Company, A California Corporation
17 45 Orangewood A venue
Orange, CA 92668
Phone No. (714) 633-4400
The assessed valuation of the property according to the last equalized
assessment roll is $145, 000. 00.
The land is presently uninhabited, therefore the number of voters is
zero.
"K-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(G) -DISTRICT 2 "K-1"
"K-2"
April 23, 1976
Board of Directors
Page Two
·,
A check from the G. L. Lewis Company in the amount of $325. 00 for
District Processing is enclosed.
Please proceed with the processing of this annexation request. If you
require additional information please notify me.
KDM/rf
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Jim Halls
Yours very truly,
McHUGH -NORRIS, INC.
/ft,(-,;?u{J. '/~Y#rc MJ
Kevin D. McHugh
L. S. 3906
AGENDA ITEM µg(G) -DISTRICT 2 "1(-2"
.. ,.
HARVEY T. BRANDT
COUNTY CNOINCl:R
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES JAMES T. ROSTRON
CHIEF DEPUTY
"L-1"
Mr. Fred A. Harper
General Manager
DEPARTMENT OF COUN1Y ENGINEER
108 WEST SECOND STREET
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012
974-7111
April 26, 1976
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Dear Mr. Harper:
SEWAGE CAPACITY CONSIDERATIONS
LA HABRA HEIGHTS AREA
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
IRA H. ALEXANDER
ASST, CHIEF DEPUTY
GEORGE J. FRANCESCHINI
ASST. CHIEF DEPUTY
COLEMAN W. JENKINS
A&ST. CHICf" DEPUTY
RICHARDT. REID
ADMIN16TRA.TIVE Df:f'UTY
The unincorporated La Habra Heights area of Los Angeles County
has long experienced sewage disposal problems because of imper-
vious soil and rock conditions and, therefore, has need for a
public sanitary sewer system. Past investigations have shown
that a portion of the La Habra Heights area, shown on the
attached map, could be provided service through the existing
sewer systems of the City of La Habra and the Orange County
Sanitation Districts utilizing gravity flow rather than the
much more expensive installation of a pumping system. Prior
meetings with City of La Habra officials indicated that use of
this sewerage system might be possible if sufficient capacity
could be ~ade available.
On March 16, 1976, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors
authorized the County Engineer to conduct a capacity study of
the appropriate sections of the City of La Habra sanitary sewer
collection system in conjunction with the City. In addition,
the County Engineer was instructed to meet with appropriate
City of La Habra and Orange County officials in order to formu-
late an agreement for the mutual use of their sewer systems.
The above actions were taken to coincide with a matter on the
same subject that was to be brought before the La Habra City'
Council by Mrs. Beth Graham, a member of the Council. It seemed
to be her understanding, as well as ours, that the Orange County
Sanitation Districts had capacity in their system and that the
bottleneck to providing a sewer outlet for the La Habra Heights
area was the availability of capacity in the City sewerage
system.
AGENDA ITEM #9(H) -DISTRICT 3 "L-1"
"L-2"
Mr. Fred A. Harper April 26, 1976
Page 2
During the meeting before the City Council, on March 30, 1976,
Mrs. Graham indicated that she had discussed the matter with you
and that, while there appears to be capacity in your collection
system, there is a question as to the availability of capacity
in your treatment plant.
The City Council indicated that they will not consider our request
for a commitment from them until we have determined if capacity
is available in your system. Therefore, we are submitting the
following facts in an effort to determine if Orange County
Sanitation Districts have available capacity for La Habra Heights
and if they will enter into an agreement with Los Angeles County
for sewage disposal:
Accumulated Flow & Population Data
Treatment
Peak Rate Capacity
Area of Flow* Required**
Year (Acres) Dwellings Population (cfs) (MGD)
Initial 32 77 265 0.054 0.020
1978 214 379 1, 304 0.400 0.099
1990 464 629 2' 164 0.655 0.164
Ultimate 1,020 959 3,299 0.977 0.251
*Peak rate of flow based on a flow coefficient of 0.0010 cfs/AC
for Rural II, 0.1 to 1 unit/AC; 0.0015 for Urban I (limited),
1.1 to 2.0 units/AC; and 0.0030 for Urban I, 1.1 to 3.2 units/AC.
**Total sewage to be treated is based on 75 GPCD with 3.44
persons per dwelling.
The initial sewage flow into the Orange County system will be
generated by the elimination of the existing sewage pumping
station located in Agave Avenue at the County boundary. This
existing pump serves 3 subdivisions consisting of 77 lots. It
is anticipated that the pump will be abandoned and a connection
made to the City of La Habra sewers located in Carol Street
shortly after a satisfactory agreement is entered into.
AGENDA ITEM #9(H) -DISTRICT 3 "L-2"
"L-3"
Mr. Fred A. Harper
·,
April 26, 1976
Page 3
The flow anticipated for 1978 will be generated by the development
of several large parcels of land located between Cypress Street
and Fullerton Road at the County boundary. The area consists of
several parcels of land and includes approximately 82 acres. It
is zoned Urban I, 1.1 to 3.2 units/AC. Private engineers involved
with tentative tracts on this property have indicated that they
believe the maximum density that can be obtained, because of the
limiting rough terrain, would be 2.5 units per acre or a total
of 205 units. This figure is a maximum and is based on total
development of the area which may not occur within this time
frame.
In addition, it is estimated that an additional 100 dwellings
will connect to the public sewer system through private contract
or public improvement processes by the year 1978.
It is projected that an additional 250 dwellings will be connected
to the public sewer system by 1990. Our projection is that
approximately 25% of the remaining area will be connected to the
public sewer system by 1990. This will include approximately
250 new and existing homes.
The ultimate flow is based on the total number of parcels that
could be obtained with the general plan zoning and with total
participation in the public sewer system. (A reduction factor
of 25% has been applied to take into consideration the steepness)
of the terrain within the area zoned for 1 unit per acre.)
It is probable that the total maximum flow from La.Habra Heights
will never reach the volume shown in the chart and that the
maximum may not exceed the figures shown for 1990. The flow
data, zoning and population information contained in this letter
are based on the La Habra Heights Community General Plan
prepared by the Department of Regional Planning of Los Angeles
County.
AGENDA ITEM #9(H) -DISTRICT 3 "L-3"
•
II L-4"
Mr. Fred A. Harper April 26, 1976
Page 4
Your assistance in providing public sanitary sewer service to
the La Habra Heights area is greatly appreciated. Please do not
hesitate to contact me, if you require additional information
regarding this matter.
REK: OEM: jm 10
Attachment: Map
Yours very truly,
James T. Rostron
CHIEF DEPUTY
f11£/E.V~
Richard E. Kuhns
Division Engineer
cc: Mr. R. Lewis (Orange County Sanitation Districts)
Mr. L. Risner,.City Manager, La Habra
AGENDA ITEM #9(H) -DISTRICT 3 "L-4"
'·
J
"L-5" "L-5"
"M"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-85-5
APPROVING NEW STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF
SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES WITH CI1Y OF NEWPORT BEACH
A RESOLUTION OF 'D1E BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF SEWER CONNEC-
TION CHARGES WITII THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, AND
RESCINDING MINUTE ACTION RE PAYMENT OF FEES FOR
SUCH COLLECTION
* * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, the District has heretoforeentered into an agreement with the
City of Newport Beach for the collection and remittance of District connection
fees by the City; and,
WHEREAS, said agreement provides for. amendments or changes thereto; and,
WHEREAS, it appears mutually beneficial to provide for a change in
provision for remittance of connection fees to the District, and payment of
fees for collection services by the City;
NOW, 11-IF.REFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.
S, of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1·. That the certain agreement dated July 1, 1976, by and between
County Sanitation District No. 5 and the City of Newport Beach for collection
of connection charges, as provided in Sewer Connection Ordinance No. 509, as
amended, is hereby approved and adopted; and,
Section 2. That certain agreement dated September 15, 1972, between the
parties hereto is hereby terminated as of July 1, 1976; and,
Section 3. That the minute action of March 15, 1966, directing that fees
charged for collecting District's connection charges be paid out of the Operating
Fund of the District, is hereby rescinded; and,
Section 4. That the Chainnan and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #9(J) -DISTRICT 5 "M"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-87-7
ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE
DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 46 -TRACTS NOS.
8799 AND 8827)
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF
TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 46 -
TRACTS NOS. 8799 AND 8827 TO COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT NO. 7
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to Cotmty Sanitation
District No. 7 for annexation of said territory to the District by means of a
petition filed by the prope~ty owner; and,
Section 2. That, pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of
1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State _of California, application
has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Conunission for annexation
of said territory to Colmty Sanitation District No. 7 by means of Resolution
No. 75-38-7,
0
filed with said Commission by the District; and,
Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory
proposed to be annexed is "ANNEXATION NO. 46 -TRACTS NOS. 8799 AND 8827 TO COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7", the exterior boundaries of which are described on
Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part
of this resolution; and,
Section 4. That the territory hcreinbefore referred to is tminhabited; and,
Section 5. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and
provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and,
"N-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(L) -DISTRICT 7 "N-1"
Section 6. That said annexation is subject to the following terms and
conditions heretofore established by the Board of Directors:
'111at annexation acreage fees for Tract No. 8827 in effect at the
time of final approval (approximately $20,580 based on 20 acres),
plus State Board of Equalization processing fees are paid prior
to final approval of Annexation No. 46 by the Board of Directors; and,
Execution of a note by the proponents payable to District No. 7 for
the balance of approximately $41,160 (based on 40 acres) and Deed
of Trust With An Assignment Of Rents to the District to secure said
note; and,
Semi-annual payment of interest on said outstanding amount to the
Di~trict at the rate of 7% per annum; and,
Payment of District No. 7 annexation acreage fees in effect at
the time the tract map is recorded, but in no event later than
July 1, 1977.
Section 7. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation
Conunission pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6
of the Government Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and
described hereinabove, be and it is hereby ordered annexed to County Sanitation
District No. 7 without notice or hearing and without election.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #9(L) -DISTRICT 7
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C .O. NO. 2
--------~------~~~
C fRACTOR: Clifford L. Thompson Construction Company ..._.... DATE __ ~~-A_p_r_i_l_3_0~, __ 19_7~6----~
JOB: Remodel Newland-Hamilton Pumping Station Facilities,· Contract No. 11-4R
Amount of tht s Change Order (ADD) (~trnm~+) $ 157.31
· In accordance with contract provision~, the following changes in the contract and/or
contract work are hereby authorized and as compensution therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are he\cby appr~ved.
ADJUSfMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUfu~TITIES
ADD:
Item
No.
2
Unit
L.F.
Change Est'd Quantities
From To
128 134
Extension of Contract Time
Difference
6 @ 26.21875/.L.F. 157.31
TOfAL ADD: 157.31
The contractor is hereby granted an extension of
contract time for material delays 66 Calendar Days
Summary of Contr~ct Ti~e
Original Contract Date
Original Contract.}ime
Original Completion Date
Time Extension this Olange Order
Total Time Extension
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
Board authorization date: May 12, 1976
November 27, 1975
60 Ca leridar Days
J~nuary 25, 1976
66 Calendar Days
96 Calendar Days
156 Calendar Days
April 30, 1976
Original Contract Price $ 19, 821.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 1,214.95
Th Is Change (ADD) (l)!iljXJt~) $ 157.31
Amended Contract Price $_ 21, 193_._26 ____ _
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRJ CTS OF
Or~nge County, California
/} ,..-.'·~~ .--~,..~ ~· .4.·/ ~ '
By / "/l.._,, <~. -~ "' C-4 <_.~ . .,,.....-'\( . '..__
/ J Chief [ngi nee
_/
II O" AGENDA ITEM #9(N) -DISTRICT 11 II O"
"P"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-89-11
.
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 11-4R AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF 111E BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO.
ll-4R AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSE-
OUT AGREEMENT .
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. 1bat the contractor, Clifford L. Thompson Construction Company,
has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract to
REMODEL NEWLAND-HAMILTON PUMPING STATION FACILITIES, CONTRACT NO. 11-4R, on the
30th of April, 1976; and,
Section 2. 1bat the District's Chief Engineer has recorrunended acceptance
of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the
contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and or~ered filed; and,
Section 3. 1bat Contract No. 11-4R, Remodel Newland-Hamilton Pumping
Station Facilities, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms
of the contract therefor, dated the 27th day of November, 1975; and,
Section 4. 1bat the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 5. 1bat the Final Closeout Agreement with Clifford L. 1bompson
Construction Company,. setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of
said Contract No. 11-4R, Remodel Newland-Hamilton Pumping Station Facilities, is
hereby approved; and,
Section 6. 1bat the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are
hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #9Co) -DISTRICT 11 "P"
LAW Ol'"l'"ICES
fUCMARO 0. ,.RAZCE
BTCPHCN C.STCWART
Tt40MAS L.WOOORUP"P"
JC,.P'RCY A. HARTMAN
1055 NORTH MAIN STRCET, SUITE 1020
SANTA ANA. CALI f'ORNIA 9Z701
ARCA COOC ~14
83D•CZ1l
"Q-1"
April 29, 1976
Boards of Directors .
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
P. o. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject: Adoption of Conflict of Interests Code
As each of you has been made aware, the provisions of the Political
Reform Act of 1974 (Proposition 9) are now being implemented and
specifically require all local public agencies to adopt a conflict
of interest code that will apply to its officers and employees.
On behalf of the County Sanitation Districts, the code will be
adopted by the Board of Directors of each District and will be
submitted to the Orange County Board of Supervisors for their
review and approval. The Board of Supervisors has established
the date of August 1, 1976 as the final date for submission of
the District's code.
The Execu·tive Conunittee is being requested to revie:w the draft
of the code which is the basis upon which the specific code will
be submitted to the full Boards at the meeting of June. This
draft code is the product of the Attorneys Conunittee for the
California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) and, in
my opinion, is the best product of efforts to have a comprehen-
sive yet simplified set of rules. It is considerably more
specific than the model code proposed by the League of California
Cities and, while a few paragraphs will need to be changed to
more precisely identify the factual situation with our Districts,
the substance is basically being recommended by my office.
It now appears that the code will be made to apply to the super-
visory category employees of the District, in view of the fact
that they generally have the ability to make or participate in
the making of decisions which could foreseeably have a material
effect on a financial interest of the person holding their
position. Additionally, a few other categories will necessarily
AGENDA ITEM #12CA)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "Q-1"
"Q-2"
Boards of Directors
April 29, 1976
Page Two
have to be included because of the particular responsibilities
of the jol:smeeting the same criteria.
It i~ ~lso being recommended that the code to be adopted by the
Districts will require the consultants to the Districts, such as
engineering firms and general counsel, be made to comply with all
of its provisions. I do point out, however, that there are some
exceptions, such as a consultant who owns less than a 10% interest
in the firm which is being retained by the District need not
disclose, on the basis of a minimum involvement.
With regard to the form of the reporting requirements, it is
substantially similar to that presently being required of ·most
Directors in their capacities as members of the City Councils.
Finally, with .respect.to the adoption of the code, we are, as
noted above, required to submit our adopted code to the Board
of Supervisors by August 1, 1976. ·However, the code that will
be submitted to the Board for approval will include my recom-
mendation that it not become effective as a law governing the
officers and employees of the District until January 1, 1977.
This recorrunendation is based primarily upon the fact that no
effective date is required as a matter of State law and,
secondly, it will avoid one additional filing during 1976
in view of the numerous filings that have already been made
by most Directors. Likewise, the actual filing date is not
yet determined, but at this point it would appear that the
month of April will be selected as the annual anniversary
date. The purpose of this is to coincide with the reporting
dates that the Directors will experience as members of the
City Councils and, therefore, will prevent an unnecessary
amount of duplicate efforts spread through several months
of the year.
~:::~~r·
General Counsel
TLW:·ab
AGENDA ITEM #12(A)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "Q-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-90
SE'ITING TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING ON
A PROPOSED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARDSOF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
SETIING A TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING ON A,
PROPOSED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
* * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 87300 requires every local government
agency to adopt and promulgate a Conflict of Interest Code; and,
WHEREAS, there has been presented to these Boards a proposed Conflict of
Interest Code for these Districts, a copy of which 1s on file with the Secretary
of the Districts; and,
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 87311 requires that the review and prepa-
ration of Conflict of Interest Codes shall be carried out under procedures which
guarantee officers, employees, members, and consultants of the Districts and to
residents of the jurisdiction adequate notice and a fair opportunity to present
their views;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the 9th day of ~une, 1976, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., in
the regular meeting place of these Boards, 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley,
California, be, and the same is hereby, appointed and fixed as the time and
place when and where these Boards will consider and determine whether the afore-
said proposed Conflict of Interest Code shall be adopted.
Section 2. TI1at the Secretary·of these Districts be, and is hereby,
directed to give notice of said hearing by publication of this resolutiori in
full once, at least ten days prior to said hearing, in a newspaper of general
circulation in the Districts.
"R-1 11 AGENDA ITEM #12(A)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "R-1"
Section 3. That the Secretary of these Districts be, and is hereby,
directed to distribute or make available one copy of this resolution together
with one copy of the aforesaid Conflict of Interest Code to each person or
persons holding positions within the District enumerated in Exhibit "A" of
said Code.
Section 4. That the Secretary of these Districts be, and is hereby,
directed to file copies of said Conflict of Interest Code in the District
office to be available for distribution to persons requesting the same.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1976.
"R-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(A)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "R-2"
"-"" .
LAW OF"f"IC£S
RICHARD O. ,.RAZ££
STCPHCN C.STCWART
THOMAS L. WOOORUf',.
..JCf"f"RCY A. HARTMAN
Stcwd rt, 'VooJ ruff & frdzce
1055 NORTH MAIN STREET, SUITE 1020
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701
AREA COO£ 71"'
63&· 6212
"S-1"
May 5, 1976
Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 2
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject: Request by Garden Grove Sanitary District for
Waiver of Connection Charges
..
By letter dated March 9, 1976, the District has received a
request from the Garden Grove Sanitary District, a member
agency of Sanitation District No. 2·, to waive the provisions
of Ordinance Nos. 202 and 203 of the District for twenty-one
homes constructed in Garden Grove on Ranchero Way and Ranchero
Place·in 1952.
A rev~ew of this letter indicates that they are specifically
asking that the charges be waived in view of the considerable
sum that would be due and owing as compared with the total
cost to be incurred by those property owners as a result of
the formption of a special assessment district.
I have reviewed the provisions of Ordinance Nos. 202 and 203
which are presently in force for District No. 2, together
with the request of the Garden Grove Sanitary District and
submit the following opinion pertaining thereto.
ISSUE
May the District properly waive connection fees that are
established pursuant to the provisions of District ordinances?
. ANSWER
The connection charges cannot be waived.
DISCUSSION
Article 1 of Ordinance No. 202 reflects that the revenues which
are derived from the connection charges are to be used to defray
AGENDA ITEM #12(B)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "S-1"
"S-2"
Board of Directors
May 5, 1976
Page Two
the costs of the repayment of principal and interest on bonds,
the construction or reconstruction and the maintenance of an
adequate sewerage system within the territory of the District,
such construction being limited to the main· trunks and outfalls
as opposed to new local sewers.
More specifically, Article 3 of Ordinance No. 202 provides that
no person shall be permitted to connect to the sewerage facilities
of the District without first obtaining a connection permit.
Article 6 of Ordinance No. 202, which has been amended by Ordi-
nance No. 203, further provides that before any connection permit
shall be issued, the applicant shall pay to the District the
charges specified in said ordinance. In this case, the connection
charges amount to $220.00 per dwelling unit.
Th~re are no provisions contained in either ordinance to allow
for a waiver under special circumstances other than Section
(a) (2) of Article 6 of Ordinance No. 202, as amended, which
allowed for the issuance of connection permits without charge.
prior to August 1, 1974. The purpose of that was to allow
those properties which were within the limits of the District
to make their connections without incurring any significant
cash outlay as a result of the District ordinance. However,
that time having passed, there is no further authority for the
District or the staff to waive the requirement of this law.
_y /:pf~ .• o .. ,,~,.~ .,L:'.j_/ //) ,,,:..-.1 /.., "-<~-:.-c;, t.,,~· <,
Thomas '!:".'Woodruff /'/
General Counsel
TLW:ab
cc: Mr. Fred A. Harper
Mr. J. Wayn~ Sylvester
AGENDA ITEM #12CB)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "S-2"
L
~
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
SUBJEC~ Orange County (CSDOC) Environmental
Impact Statement DATE: APR 3 0 1~70
FR0~1: ~--,.,/~~~ Fred Krieger '1/•~ A.P'-/
TO: Robert Gillette (SWRC~)
As a follow up to the meeting on April 27, 1976,
we would like to confirm that the costs projected by
J. B. Gilbert and Associates as necessary to support
their effort through printing of the draft (total of
$160,000) appear reasonable and we do not anticipate
any objections.
We urge the consultant in conjunction with the
Districts, the SWRCB and ourselves to proceed as
expeditiously as possible so as to complete the EIS
as soon as feasible. It should be noted that all
requests for interim payments should be cleared
through the EPA as described in Provision II-6 of
the Memorandwn of Understanding.
cc: Ray Lewis
EPA Form 1320-6 (Rev. 6-72)
"T" AGENDA ITEM #12(c)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "T"
J.B. Gilbert & Associates
Planning & Engineering Consult<lnts
1101 R Street, Sacramento, Ca 95814
(916) 444-0123
April 15,.1976
0 Bay Arca Offier
Claremont Hotel, Berkeley. ca 94 70~
(415) 843·0298
0 Tahoe Office:
2155 South Street, P.O. Box 14446
South Lake Tahoe. ca n5702
(~16) 541·5775
Mr. Ray Lewis
Chief Engineer
County Sanitation Districts
of· Orange County
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Costs of Additional Work on Draft EIR/EIS
Dear .Mr. Lewis:
.·.,.
At the March 18 meeting with EPA and SWRCB representatives, an
extensive amount of supplemental EIR/EIS work was requested.
This is an addition to the expanded scope resulting from initial
EPA review of the first five chapters.
EPA has indicated its desire to make this EIR/EIS a major
decision-making document on such subjects as marine impacts and
air quality mitigation measures. Additional work resulting from
EPA's request includes a detailed analysis of wastewater
reclamation options, further air quality investigations, more
extensive use of graphics, a change in organization of the report
from the initial outline, and additional information on land use,
population growth, marine biology, and measures to mitigate air
quality impacts.
Attachment 1 to this letter is a cost estimate for the work that
remains to be done. As of early April, we have spent approxi-
mately $52,000 of our initial $60,000 authorization. We estimate
that the draft document will be delayed three to four months and
cost an additional $100,000. Also attached is a revised schedule
for completion of the EIS.
While EPA has indicated satisfaction with the technical content
of work to date, their staff members must be satisfied with the
document since it is essentially EPA's EIS. While much of the
information being developed will not be of direct benefit to the
wastewater function in Orange County, it will provide a valuable
reference document for a variety of public agencies and can help
clarify the controversial issues of marine disposal and air
quality mitigation.
C:t>ll~ultin~~ Sl·r-viccs O Er1\'ironnKTll O \Vatcr D \Vc1stcwater 0 Covcr11n1c111<ll :\ft(·1ir~
"U-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(c)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "U-1"
Mr. Ray Lewis 2 Ap~il 15, 1976
During the course of this work, we have made every effort to keep
costs to a minimum. Kris Lindstrom's familiarity with the County
and the District's activities as well as our firm's experience
in EIS work has helped. However, EPA has firmed up and expanded
its view of the EIR/EIS. While these additional costs are
certainly significant, they are consistent with the level of
effort currently being undertaken by EPA in major regional EIS's
in other parts of the State. If you would like additional
information regarding the attached budget and additional scope
of work, we would be glad to provide it in writing or meet with
you and appear before the District Board.
Very truly yours,
J. B. GILBERT & ASSOCIATES
. ....-···~/';; : . . '
• I' -:...... . :-. • ) ' ~-: .'· --·-· .... ~ -.. · ... ....... , .
Jerome B. Gilbert
. _,;
I
Attachments
iJJ
"U-2" AGENDA ITEM #12Cc)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "U-2"3
Pl<:1nning & Engineering Consull<Jnts J. 1-3. GillJCrt ~
"U-3 11
ATTACHMENT 1
SUMMARY OF ANTICIPATED COSTS
CSDOC EII~/EIS
After May 1, 1976
Development of supplemental information and data
requested by EPA for incorporation in the draft
including:
Marine biology
Air quality
Land use
Institutional framework and
mitigation measures
Miscellaneous supplemental work
Report preparation expenses
including drafting and
additional typing
Printing of Draft EIR/EIS
Contingency
$ 6,000
3,000
6,000
5,000
5,000
15,000
35,000
10,000
$ 85,000
Additional work on development of reclamation
alternatives for incorporation into the
Facilities Plan and EIR/EIS:
Engineering
Environmental assessment
Total additional anticipated costs of
preparing Draft EIR/EIS
$ 10,000
5,000
$ 15,000
$100,000
Note: These costs do not include the preparation of
responses to the comments on the Draft EIR/EIS nor
printing. Our experience has been that these costs
are a minimum of $25,000 equally divided between
reproduction of the Final EIS and professional time.
The exact level of effort required should be determined
by the District and EPA following the comment period.
.~
(.)
r..
AGENDA ITEM #12Cc)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS
Planning & Engineering Co11Sult<.mts
"U-3"~ < J. 13. G i lt)ert cZ
Tasks
ATTACHMENT 2
PROJECTED SCHEDULE
CSDOC EIR/EIS
Task
Completion Date Elapsed Time
1. Preliminary Draft
Facilities Plan 2/20/76
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
"U-4"
First Preliminary Draft
EIS (All Chapters)
EPA Branch Review
(All Chapters)
Consultant Revision
(Submit Second Preliminary
Draft)
EPA Division Review,
Advisory Committee Review
Consultant Revision
(Submit Final Draft)
EPA Review and Signature
Change
Draft Printing and
Distribution (Mailing to
CEQ)
Public Notice for Public
Hearing
Public Hearing
Final EIS Published
6~30/76 6 weeks
7/15/76 5 weeks
8/15/76 4 weeks
9/15/76 4 weeks
11/1/76 3 weeks
11/22/76 3 weeks
Christmas season, 4 weeks
delay mailing:
Reconunend 1/10/76
1/13/76 3 days
2/17/76 5 weeks
6/1/77 3-1/2 months
(f, v ....... rv
~ r--.._
r..n
AGENDA ITEM #12(c)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "U-4"3
Pl<.mning & r:nginccring Consult(mts J. 13. Gilbert ~
l -.
ATTACHMENT 3
TASK DESCRIPTIONS
REVIEW OF MARINE IMPACT ANALYSIS
BY AN INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT
The assessment of marine impacts associated with the past, present,
and projected CSDOC discharge has been completed. In order to
assure that this section contains an objective and thorough
presentation of the important impacts relating to the discharge
and the potential effects from improved treatment, it is
desirable to obtain an independent evaluation and review by a
qualified outside consultant.
This outside evaluator would review and reconunend changes in the
drafts including impacts assessments and technical conclusions.
We have approached a well qualified individual at Scripps
Institute of Oceanography to pursue this task. This may result
in additional work after we reorganize the information as requested
by EPA, which has not yet reviewed the material in detail.
AIR QUALITY
EPA has requested additional work on air quality including
quantification of impacts specifically within the CSDOC service
area. Air pollutant projections and an air quality analysis based
upon projected growth have recently been updated reflecting the
latest air pollutant emissions inventory and emissions forecasting
methods. Additional information has been requested on: health
effects and environmental impacts such as vegetation damage,
regional trends and programs, and the recent efforts of the Air
Quality Maintenance Planning effort.
LAND USE
More detailed information and quantification of changes in land
use within the Districts' service area has been requested. This
additional effort will entail considerable in-depth analysis
and basic data collection. Specific changes in the amount of
agricultural land corrunitted to urban development; the influence
of the State Coastal Plan on subregional growth; more detailed
discussions of soils, geologic hazards, flooding, and urban form
U)
CJ ..,._
0
~
0
'J)
(fJ
"U-5" AGENDA ITEM #12 (c) (2) -ALL DISTRICTS "U-5"<(
Planning & Engineering Consultants J.B. GillJert cO
. .• . "" .
2
have been requested. A minimum effort to meet the additional
requests for data and graphics is estimated to cost $6,000. If
analysis of individual City General Plans for all 23 cities
within the Districts' service area is required, costs will be
much higher. At the present time, such detailed analyses are not
anticipated, although specific plans will be examined with
regard to environmentally critical areas such as the Balsa
Chica wetlands area.
----~-----------
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK AND
MITIGATION MEASURES
Additional work effort is anticipated in analyzing mitigation
measures within the CSDOC service area and developing institutional
arrangements for implementing some of these measures. More in-
depth analysis of the effectiveness of air quality mitigation
measures has been suggested. Also, preparation of additional
material for and our participation in mitigation workshops with
local agencies is anticipated. A minimum cost of $5,000 is
presently anticipated, but this could be increased if
additional analysis is requested or extensive participation is
required for meetings.
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLEMENTAL WORK
Additional information and analyses is required on water supply
and regulatory programs, and how they effect the Districts'
programs including air pollution control, transportation planning,
health and water quality regulations, and land use planning. It
is anticipated that this will require a minimum of $5,000 of
work effort to obtain the basic information requested.
OTHER PRODUCTION EXPENSES
Due to the extensive nature of this report which is now
approximately 700 pages in length, a major effort has been
expended in terms of typing, editing, drafting, xeroxing, and
preparing review copies for EPA. Revisions involving rewriting,
updating, incorporating changes, final editing, and the prepara-
tion of additional graphics will require extensive staff time.
Attendance at meetings, travel, telephone bills, xeroxing, and
other related expenses also accompanying any work effort of this
magnitude. These costs are estimated at $15,000. This also
includes additional work in developing a sununary document for use
during the public participation phases of the planning program. CV ·-u
0
V)
U)
"U-6" AGENDA ITEM #12(c)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "U 6'v --......
Plant)ing & E.nginccring Consult<Jnts J.B. GillJcrt c.Q
RESOLUTION NO. 76-92
APPROVING AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH J. B.
GILBERT AND ASSOCIATES FOR FACILITIES PLAN EIS
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND
AUTI-IORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO IBE
AGREEMENT Willi J. IL GILBERT AND ASSOCIATES FOR
PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT RE
TREATMENT PLANT FACILITIES PLAN
* * * * * * * * * * *
\~1EREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 acting
on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11
of Orange County, California, have heretofor entered into an agreement with
J. B. Gilbert and Associates for preparation of an Environmental Impact State-
ment in connection with Districts' treatment plant facilities plan, pursuant
to a Step 1 grant approved by the Environmental Protection Agency and the State
Water Resources Control Board; and,
lffiEREAS, the Environmental Protection Agency has directed that the scope
of said Environmental Impact Statement be expanded;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section l. That Amendment No. 1 to that certain agreement dated
June l, 1975, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, on behalf
of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of
Orange County, California, and J. B. Gilbert and Associates, providing for
expanded scope of work for preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement in
connection with Districts' treatment plant facilities plan, is l1ercby approved
and accepted; and,
Section 2. TI1:it an increase in the payment provision for said services
is hereby authorized from a maximum of $60,000 to $150,000, on a per diem fee
"V-1" AGENDA ITEM #12Cc)(3) -ALL DISTRICTS 11 V-l"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-92
APPROVING AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITI-I J. B.
GILBERT AND ASSOCIATES FOR FACILITIES PLAN EIS
A RESOLUTION OF TI-IE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE
AGREEMENT WITI1 J. B. GILBERT AND ASSOCIATES FOR
PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT RE
TREATMENT PLANT FACILITIES PLAN
* * * * * * * * * * *
----WHEPEAS, th6 3,_,ard ·.Jf Dii~cctors of County Sanitation District No. 1 acting
on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11
of Orange County, California, have heretofor entered into an agreement with
J. B. Gilbert and Associates for preparation of an Environmental Impact State-
ment in connection with Districts' treatment plant facilities plan, pursuant
to a Step 1 grant approved by tl1e Environmental Protection Agency and the State
Water Resources Control Board; and,
WHEREAS, the Environmental Protection Agency has directed that the scope
of said Environmental Impact Statement be expanded;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. TI1at Amendment No. 1 to that certain agreement dated
June 1, 1975, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, on behalf
of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of
Orange County, California, and J. B. Gilbert and Associates, providing for
expanded scope of work for preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement in
connection with Districts' treatment plant facilities plan, is hereby approved
and accepted; and,
Section 2. That an increase in the payment provision for said services
is hereby authorized from a max:i.mwn of $60,000 to $150,000, on a per diem fee
"V-1" AGENDA ITEM #J.2(c) (3) ·-ALL DISTRICTS "V-1"
basis, plus printing and publication costs not to exceed $35,000; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District
No. 1 are hereby authorized to execute said amendment on behalf of itself and
Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1976.
----
"V-2" AGENDA ITEM #12Cc)(3) -ALL DISTRICTS "V-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-91
AUTI10RIZING THE GENERAL MANAGER AND JOINT
CHAIRMAN TO DESIGNATE DIRECTORS TO REPRESENT
Tirn DISTRICTS ON DISTRICT BUSINESS
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AUTI10RI ZING TI-IE GENERAL MANAGER AND JOINT
CHAIRMAN TO DESIGNATE DIRECTORS TO REPRESENT
THE DISTRICTS ON DISTRICT BUSINESS AND PRO-
VIDING FOR COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF
EXPENSES INCURRED RELATING 111ERETO
* * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors have previously acted to authorize the
General Manager to designate Directors and staff members to attend meetings,
conferences, hearings and other functions within the State of California; and,
WHEREAS, said authority does not provide for the Directors to be compen-
sated for the time spent while attending to such business of the Districts; and,
WHEREAS, the Districts have recently adopted resolutions to compensate
Directors for attending meetings, conferences, hearings and other functions on
behalf of the Districts when approved by the Boards; and,
M1EREAS, it 6ccasionally happens that the need for a Director to attend a
meeting, conference or hearing arises before the Directors can act to approve
said attendance.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. The General Manager, with the concurrence of the Joint Chairman,
is authorized to designate Directors to attend any meeting, conference, hearing
or other function on behalf of the Districts, when it is deemed to be in the
best interests of the Districts.
"W-1 11 AGENDA ITEM #12(n) -ALL DISTRICTS "W-1"
Section 2. Any Director attending a meeting, conference, hearing or
other function on behalf of the Districts, when designated by the General
Manager and Joint Chairman, shall be entitled to receive the sum of Fifty
Dollars ($50.00) per day, but in no event shall the Directors' total compen-
·.
sation, including attendance at regular or special meetings of the Board of
Directors, exceed Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) per month.
·Section 3. When traveling on the business of one or more Districts, the
Director shall be entitled to reimbursement of expenses necessarily incurred
in the course of said travel in accordance with the following schedule:
"W-2"
Commercial Transportation -per actual invoice
Hotel -room rate per actual statement for occupancy
Registration -actual cost of conference or meeting registration fee
Ground Transportation -as itemized
Telephone Service -as itemized
Meals, Gratuities and Incidentals -$20.00 per day. In those cases
where the actual cost of the Director's personal meals and inci-
dentals required during the course of the conference or meeting
exceeds the per diem, reimbursement will be based upon actual
expenditures.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #12Cn) -ALL DISTRICTS
CONSTRUCTION
PROGRESS REPORTS ,.
APRIL 30, 1976
ENGINEERING DEPART1\1ENT
D/6E~TERf
BLOWER · j --1 .BIJILOl~(kJ -:. . '--)
,A l t::5-:5 /-~~,!} I
I~ 9 8 r ' 5 4 3 2 I
.
__..;:::,..
. ,.£ r ~ .-~J
f?JJ?n1L ,
2 I
4 ~
6 s
8 7
/0 9
I Z JI
14 13
1EtONDA R Y CLAR/FIERS
50 _MG.D __ ACTIVATED_SLUDGE _ PLANT
CONTR A CT NO ... P_t __ ~_.16
. .
.,
C.ONTRACT .NO .. P1 -1.6
SO MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT
Donovan Construction Company of Minnesota, Contractor
STARTING DATE: June 27' 1974
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $29,876,ooo.oo
, PAID TO DATE: $25,200,507.53
Contra.ct is ·for the construction of Activated
·· Sludge secoruf.ary treatment faciZities at Plant No.
l. The nelJ f aci U ties UJi ZZ aid the Districts in
meeting m:i:ndated State and Federa.Z ocean discharge
requirements.
When comp Zeted, the secondary treatment system
flJiZZ. process the 50 mgd of wastewater floUJing
through Plant No. l. The effluent wi'll then blend
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED:
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE:
Dec. 14, 1976 .· ....
30 Calendar Days
Jan. 13, 1977
lllith Plant No. 2 effluent at the outfa! Z booster
sta-t.ion, improving the overaZZ quality of water
pwnped through the outfaZZ system into the ocean.
Significant structUPes incZud.ed in the contra.at
are the BZower Building, Aeration Basins, Second-
aI'!J Cla.rifiers, tiJJo Digesters, Waste Sludge Thick-
eners and the Power Bui Zding.
. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Work on Pl-16 is slow.. Blower building balcony concrete
pours are complete. Supports for fuel tanks are ready
to pour. Tests were witnessed in Cincinnati, Ohio by
Districts' staff on return sludge pumps for this contract.
72 dusk butterfly valves (2) have been installed.
Air header supports are being poured and piping installed
at Aeration basin. Hot water loqp has been partially
completed. Screwed piping at several locations is being
complet~d.
Some equipment for collection of sludge has been installed
in secondary clarifiers. Some piping has been tested in
the waste sludge thickeners area.
Piping in Digester area is being done: sludge, hot water
and gas. Vent piping and duct work is being done at several
locations and high pressure air piping has been run thrpugh
several tunnels. Aeration basin influent pumps have been
delivered to jobsite.
~,
.:r:!1 ~[I
\]'{It
~LI
. -; I
r--
I . ~~ -~~ti ~-:Qt{
. to
1---,
I
I
r_.
I
I
I
CONTRACT PW~ 045
JPL-ACTS PROCESS PLANT
J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation & Henck Pro,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
STARTING DATE: Oct. 1, 1975
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: x
PAID TO DATE: x
Contract is for construction of a one million gal-
Um per dc4y pilot wastewater treatment plant at
Wastewater Treat;ment Plant !lo. 2. The plant will
use a unique Activated Carbon Treatment System
(AfJrS) developed by the National Aeronautics and
Space.Agency's Jet Propulsion Labora.tory. This
treatment method was perfected in its e:;;perimental.
stages with a mobile research unit open::::.ted by JPL
personnel. at the . Districts' Wastewater Treatment
Pl.ant No. l in Foimtain Val:ley during 1974-75.
The system uses sludge removed from the wastewater
to produce activated caxabon through a '{JYrolysis
reactor. The activated caI'bon is then reintro-
duced into the wastewater stream in a secorzdcay
stage for additional. rem:nxzl. of pollutants. Only
. . -partiaZZy used after the second s~ge,, the activa-
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 28, 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMP LE TI ON DATE: Jan. 2 8, 19 7 6
ted carbon and secondary sludge slurry is fed into
the incOming wastewater stream to increase system
efficiency.
The mobile experimental unit used to refine this
syatem from laboratory bench experiments was batch
operated with mechanical. handling of rr.a.ter·foZ from
stage to stage. The pilot pl.ant w-ill be a contin-
uously run, automated system.
As a prime objective of the ACTS, it could solve
an increasing problem of sludge disposal as this
m:iterial becomes more plentiful. with improved
wastelJJater treatment and increased flows. In ad-
dition, the effluent from this treatment system is
e:r:pected to meet the discharge requirements of
the Districts' N.P.D.E.S. penr.it •
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Prime and sub6ontractor's work completed. Equipment
debugging continues. Problems in.dryer-calciner areas.
(See operation reports.)
Contractor's office man and trailer to remain on job
to May 20th' for final billing and cost analysis work.
Districts·' engineering personnel to work with equipment
suppliers to insure equipment performs as required.
XThis oontroct is a design and construct contract whereby the contractor
i.8 paid $50~ 000. 00 plus the actual co~ts fo1 1 a.ii labor and materials.
O\S\.2.
GROV~ ST.
:. .... . . . .. . .· . . .. . ... .
' .. ' ·-. ..
,,
''
·· -rut ·n ~'
-.. A'Jf.. ~
'
CONTRACT 2 -14-3
SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER & SOUTH SANTA ANA
RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONNECTOR., REACHES 2, 3 & 4
John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contractor
ST AR TI NG DATE: 0 ct . 15 , 19 7 5
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $3, 814, 462. 00
PAID TO DATE: $454, 867. 00
Contract calls for t1zc construction of a 3.125
mite reinforced concrete pipe "trunk line sewer a-
long La Palma Ave. from Grove St. to Imperial Hwy.
in Anaheim.
~e first one-third of the project uses 51" diam-
ete!' pipe, the balance is 48".
Also included in the contract is a Zaterat con-
necto:re tine to the Santa Ana River Interceptor
eystem from 300' north of Santa Ana CaJZyon Rdo a-
long Imperial HuJy. to La Pal.ma Ave. This 2?50'
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Nov. 12, 1977
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Nov. 12, 1977
section of 33" diameter vitrified clay pipe is
designed to receive flows from the South River
Trunk, serving Santa Ana Canyon. ~li th the comp le-
tion of the South River Trunk, the Santa Ana Can-
yon pumping station can be abandoned.
This section of the interceptor system is designed
to handle up to 35 million gallons flow per dayo
Included in this fi[JUl'e is JO MGD allowance for
accepting future high brine wastewater flows from
San Berna.Pdino and Riverside Counties.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
.Tunneling under Tustin Avenue is complete.· The contractor
is now laying pipe on La Palma Avenue. Cleanup is in
progress at the railroad crossing tunnel site on La Palma
and from that point to Tustin Avenue. The contractor laid
726 feet of pipe during· the month.
As construction proceeds east of Tustin Avenue, grade changes
allow a more shallow trench. There is less traffic in this
area. Both conditions should assist the contractor to proceed
more rapidly in coming weeks.
DIST. 2
~ COMPLETE
............. 1'0 SE CONSTRUCTED
CONTRACT No. 2 -14 -4
PROPos~o
PARK StlE
'GYPSUtr1 .
CANYON RD.
..
PRIVATE RO.
CONTRACT 2-14-4
SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWERJ REACH 5
Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc., Contractor
STARTING DATE: Oct. 15, 1975
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $4, 240, 957. 00
PAID TO DATE: $2,968,124.00
Contract is for construction of a 5.1 mile long
section of reinforced concrete pipe trunk line
sewer from Imperial !fwy. along La Palma Aveo in.
Anaheim, traversing the new Yorba RegionaZ Park to
Jleir Canyon Rd. The right-of-way then crosses the
Santa Ana River at thlo places as it traverses
cowity territory through Santa Ana valley Irriga-
tion Co. and. Bryant Ranch properties to Gypswn Rd.
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 7' 1977
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 7' 19 7 7
Depending on design criteria, various sections of
this line use 42, 45 and 51 inch diameter pipe.
This section wiZ1.. hand'le flows up to 32 r.1iZ"lion
gallons per do.yo Ir.duded in this figure is 30
MGD allowance for accepting future high brine
wastewater flows from San Bernardino and Rivez~ide
Counties.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Construction ciontinues to go very well on· this job, in
spite of some difficulties encountered with soil conditions.
Various thicknesses .of shale and siJ:ted clay were encountered
during excavation. These caused serious dewatering problems
delaying the pipe laying operations.
The pipe heading is now in the vicinity of Featherly Regional
Park, and is expected to reach the end of the job during May.
A total of 6934 feet of pipe was laid during April.
The contractor is working on the upstream river crossing of
two crossings he must traverse. He has diverted the river
from its natur·al bed into a man-made channel and is using
earthmovers to excavate a trench in the river bottom. When pipe
is laid in this trench and covered over, the river will be
returned to its natural path. Pipe will then be laid under
the artificial channel area.
~~(,'('" V\~o\
~YJl f,....-ckw~l-"\.:,_b
DIST. 2
-II
----
CONTRACT No.
2-14-5
z
0
f./) -:r
0
t-
o(
{_COAL CANYON RD.
GYPSUM
CANYON RD.
SANTA ANA
CANYON RD.
~
~
STARTING DATE:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT:
. PAID TO DATE:
CONTRACT 2-J4-5
SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER
REACHES 6, 7 & 8
S. S. Zarubica; Contractor
Nov. 27, 1975
$2,096,676.15
$'611, 0 5 4 . 7 5
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED:
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE:
Sept . 21, · 19 7 6
O Calendar Days
Sept. 21, 1976
Contract is for the construction of ~ 2. 4 mile
'long section of reinforced concrete pipe line sew-
. er. The line goes through the Santa ~.r.a Canyon
from where Contra.ct No. 2-14-4 ends in about the
center of the Bryant Ranch property, along the
route of the Santa Ana River and throWJh the
northern portion of the Gl'een River Golf Course to
the County Line. The Zirze terminates in a control
ar.d metering structzaie designed to measure floLJa
from the upper basin cozm ties.
The line consists of 45, 42, and 39-inch diameter
sections of pipe. The diameters c.lzar.ge in rela-
tion to design requirerr.en tS. This section of the
Santa Ana River Interceptor system will har.dle
flows of approxir:-ateZy 32 nri'lZion gaZZons per Wd·
Included in this figure is 30 /.:GD allowance for
accepting future high brine ?VaStewater flows frcm
San Bernardino and Riversid.e Counties.
. ·
. •
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Pipe laying is complete from the river east along the
golf course. Tunneling is compelted under the railroad tracks,
and wrap-up on the east end of the job is underway. The
metering structure is 80 percent complete, and the roof
is expected to be poured on the structure this week .
The cont.ractor is a.ttempting to coordinate with the Green
River Golf Course management to restore the north perimeter
of the course where the pipe was laid to their satisfaction
and contract specificati?ns.
The Edison Company has experienced an unspecified delay in
·obtaining a right-of-way easement from Bryant Ranch to
provide power to our contractor on the west side of the
upstream river crossing of two crossings he must tr~verse.
·Electrical power is needed for d~watering pumps before he
can continue .
DI ST~ ... 2 __
CONTRACT No. 2-15
"' \!)
~
'AL STATE ~ULLERTON q:
CAMPUS ~
•
STARTING DATE:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT:
PAID TO DATE:
CONTRACT No. 2-15
YORBA LINDA PUMP STATION
J. Putnam Hcnck, A Corporation & Henck Pro,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
Sept. 26, 1975
_$ 6 71 ' 14 6 . 0 0
$680,040.07
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Sept· 22, 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 81 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 10, 1976
Contract is 'for the construction of a reinforced
. concrete structure to house wet wells and pwr.ps
for transferring tributary UXJ.stewater through a
force m::iin Zine into the Santa Ana River, Carbon
CCI/llJOn Inte11 ceptor-relief Trunk Line system for
conveyance to Wastewater Reclamation Plant Noo 1
in fountcrin Valley. This ?Jill assist in 11 eZieving
the presently congested Newhope-PZacentia .Trunk
Line and wiZZ aePVe proposed Zand use development
of the tributary area to the year 2010.
w1zat ?Jas 01'1.~ginaZ Zy Urziversi ty of California, Fu 1.-
Zerton property at the northern perimeter of the
campus. Special arrangements were ~de z.;ith the
University for use of the property.
The above-growui portion of the structure wi ZZ b2
a Zow profile slab 85' x 109', 2 feet above
ground. The deepest portion of the structure wiZZ
be 35 feet under the ground. The District has
agreed to construct a slump-stone fence around the
struct?aie and Zand.scape the area in accordcrace
with future corrpatible use by the University. The
University plans to construct an arboretum in the
wunediate area a·t; some future date.
-·
The pump station structure is located at the in-
tersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated
Road in Fullerton. It is being constructed on
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Job is complete except for installation of three pump_
motors .. Motor stands have not yet been delivered by
the motor manufacturer. One stand arrived during
April, but it was the wrong size and was returned.
The stands are reported to be in transit.
Z-91-Z ·of'J l8\1tJ1N0()
N L
CONTRACT 2-16-2
YORBA LINDA FORCE MAIN, FROM ASSOCIATED ROAD TO
KRAEMER BOULEVARD
Vido Artukovich & Sons, Inc., Contractor
STARTING DATE:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT:
PAID TO DATE:
Jan . 2 9 , 19 7 6 ,
$660,287.98
$503, 551. 48
Contract is for constztuction of a 1. 4 mile set.Jer
force main of 30-inch ductile iron pipe. This
'Line wi ZZ ca!TlJ se1 • .'age pwnped from the Yorba Linda
Pwrp Station at Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associ-
ated Road in Fullerton to a reach of the Santa Ana
River Trwzk Zine system at Palm lJ!'ive and Kroemer
Bouteva:rd in Placentia.
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976
This force rrain and the pump station are dcsi91ed
to relieve the presently congested Nauhcpe-PZ~cer.
tia Trunk Line. It wi lZ serve proposed Zand use
development of the tributary area t-0 the year 2010.
The force main .is designed to accept up to 15 miZ-
Zion gallons per clay flows.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Pipe is all in except under the freeway, a 900 foot portion
of Yorba Linda Blvd. and Sapphire Road. A total of 2666 feet
of pipe was laid during April. The.Yorba Linda Blvd. and
Sapphire Road sections ar~ awaiting a decision on redesign
caused by discovery of an 86-inch storm drain in the path
of construction last month. The storm drain was shown
incorrectly on the as-built plans and thus incorrectly shown
on our plans. The conflict now, is who will complete the
redesigned portion, and at what price. Estimates obtained
by the District staff indicate the contractor wants too much
money for construction in the· redesigned area.
First course paving is completed on all portions of the project
where pipe is in the ground ·except at the intersection of
Placentia Ave. and Yorba Linda Blvd. A pit has been left
open at this point for access to the pipe tunneled under
Placentia.Ave~ The contractor does not wish to perform air
tests on this section and grouting of the tunnel so the hole
can be closed, until the entire line is in and can be air
tested. ·The supervising engineer has ordered him to perform
the tests and close the hole, which blocks an access drive
to a gas station.
The tunnel under the freeway is completed and pipe will be
installed early in May.
CITY OP
ANAJIEIM
\ uvn~-\.\ ~V-12.-~~
""'"".,.~ ~v-~ £/NOA
b Y°'::)k.~ ~~~v-\ \ ~
RANGE AVE.
RCJAD
CITY or
~ BUENA
~
~ PARK
~ ~
CERRITOS AVE.
CITY
OF" s. P.
-:t::t::t:t::t::t:=*=~~=::t~~~~::t4~t:t:=lt::a:S:::t:i:::t~~:::i::i:t::t::s:~~i:i:r
CYPRESS
~.
DI ST. __ 3_
SYRACUSE.
--COMPLETE
AVE.
~ --TO BE CONSTRUCTED
.,
CONTRACT No. 3-20-2
N
CONTRACT No. 3-20-2
KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 7
A. G~ Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Co.,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
STARTING DATE:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT:
PAID TO DATE:
March 6, 1975
$3,876,870.00
$3,778,352.50
· · Contract is for installation of a Reinforced Con-
crete Pipe (R.C.P.) sewer line from a point 1200
feet south of Kate iza Avei'lUe on Knott Avenue in
Stanton, north on Knott Avenue to Lincoln Avenue
in Anaheim, a distance of 2. 3 miles. Pipe diame-
ters are ?2" for the first 3, 900 feet, 63" for
6, 900 feet and 66" for the remainiri.g 1200 feet of
the project. Flows from this reach wi Z Z drain in.;.
to Contract 3-20-1 to the south.
This project is a portion of the Y.nott Interceptor
relief system designed to relieve the presently
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: March 6, 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: March 6, 1976
congested ~filler-Holder Trunk Sewer by intercep-
ting flows f1 1 om the northwest portion of District
3. The southerly terniinus of the system is at the
intersection of Brookhurst Street and Ellis Avenue
in Fountain VaZZey. It will eventuaZZy extend to
Imperial Avenue in La Hahra.
This portion of the relief system is designed to
handle a fZow of 68 million gallons per day and
1'l'lU serve the proposed developed Zand use plan in
the tribu ta:cy ro~ea to the year 2010.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Pipelaying is complete to the intersection of Knott Ave.
and Lincoln Ave. Welding of plastic liner joints in the line
is underway and proceeding well. Contractor laid 5 30 feet .of
pipe during April. One hundred fifty feet of pipe remain to
be laid north of the intersection.
Tunneling under the intersection of Knott Ave. and Lincoln Ave.
was delayed during the month by flooding from a broken water
line. Wate~ intrusion caused a partial collapse of the tunnel
and damaged equipment, necessitating time-consuming repairs.
The broken 8" water line, owned by the City of Buena Park, was
pressurized but not in active use. It has been shut off. . The
contractor resumed operations May 3 and is working three shifts
around the clock to expedite completion of the project.
The contractor has employed a new paving subcontractor to
replace the previous company that went into bankruptcy last
month. First course paving is now completed as far north as
Del Monte St. First course paving is in at Knott Ave. and
Bali Road following completion of a lateral sewer line in that
intersection.
:·
~~'<vc:\-,m
~,\\ ~""' \~~~
~ ~-IV\C)~ •
DIST. 3
e m:w COMPLETE
-11m1--TO BE CONSTRUCTED
CONTRACT No.
3-21-2
EXERCISE
CRESC'.E.NT 11
·I
I
I
I
1:
LINCOLN 1• :n. fl ca nm mm mm ... r..&M lt!!ll ... 1131 u..
t-
w
ld
ex:
J-
Ul ORANG£
-:z :z
'"'J'
J-w
lU er
I-
U)
>
0
0
0
.~ v F:.
AVE.
AVE.
~ ~g SAtL Rn .
. J-C-~-~--~---_?N~C-~-~E-~.~-------·.·. ---J-r:_µ.~.:-.'.'/E.L
_J f\:11 RA
__j_I _M_A~R~1o_N ____ ~ll AVE.
_ __.° C£RR.ITOS [ Avr..
TRACK""'----lr-~1 STABLE$
~ '61 ~
\ .... ' ---' ---I 5.P.R.P..
_ lJU:IUll:~llll Iii Iii 111111ii11Ii1111111 ll~t
11 ARROWHEAD I I
MFG. co. I'
____ -:J !<A.TELL.A AVf'..
CONTRACT 3-21-2
WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR
PORTION OF REACH 2 7 AND REACHES 28 AND 29
B & P Construction Company, Contractor
STARTING DATE: Apr. 29, 1976
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $1,177,745.00
PAID .TO DATE: $00. ·oo
Contract is for construction of a 2. '15 mile sec-
tion of vitrified clay pipe tru.nk line sewer
through the City of CzJpress from Y..ateUa Avenue in
Los Alamitos to Crescent Avenue in Ia Palma. De-
pending on d2sign critieria, the pipe line is in
various sizes from 15" to 30" in diameter.
This section of line will complete the rraster-
planned Ilestside Re lief Interceptor selJer that be-
gins at the Seal Beach BZvd. Pwnping Station at
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED:
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE:
Dec. 24, 1976
0 Calendar Days
De c . 2 4 , 19 7 6
Seal Beach Blvd. and Westminster Ave. This sustem
is designed to re Ueve the Los A Zami tos Su}-i t~nk,
which at present functions as the rrain setJer for
the wes tside basin. For the most pm.1 t:., this Zine
is currently flowing at or near peak capacivd•
This section is designed to handle flows up to
6.32 million gallons per day and will serve pro-
posed land use pl.ans in the tributary to the year
2010. .
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Con~ractor will begin work in mid-May. A major
change was made from the construction schedule indicated
in the job specifications. At a preconstruction conference
with utilities and representatives of businesses that would
be affected by the project, it was discovered the published
schedule would i~terfere'with race track traffic along
Cerritps Blvd., and with activities at the track's exercise
ring. Additionally, interference with employee access to
the Arrowhead Manufacturing Co. during a busy period would
be conside·rably lessened by postponing construction through
their property until later in the year.
A decision was made to construct the portion of the job
from Cerritos Blvd. north~ then return around September and
start at Katella Ave. to construct from the project beginning
point to the tie-in at Cerritos Blvd.
~ u"""'.Q. 'f oU.S l cu s: '<..
\().+-a. v"~ I~ '<'.uk: ~~Ii AP f./\ AN
\"' K\s. G.\f"~
DIST. 7 -COMPLETE
------TO BE CONSTRUCTED
CONTRACT NO.
7-6 -8
..
CONTRACT 7-6-8
TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, PORTION OF REACH 12 1 REACH 131
AND PORTION OF REACH 14
Steve Bubalo Construction Company, Contractor
STARTING DATE: Jan. 29, 1976
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $512,892.00
PAID TO DATE: $4.11, 913. 00
Contract is for constructing a 1. 78 mile section
of trunk Zir.e sewer of 21 and 27 inch diarr.eter
vitrified clay pipe (VCP) in the Lenvn Heights
area of Orange.
The line begins in the vicinity of Fairhaven Ave-
nue and Esp la:rzade Street, goes north on Esplanade
Street to Spring Street and east on Spring Street
to Santiago BouZevc.rd.
CONTRACT COMP LET I ON DATE: July 26, 19 7 6
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976
\
This project is the firzal portion of the master-
planned Tustin-Orange Trunk Li"le ReUef System •
The system provides droinage for the cer.trd and
northern portion::; of Dist!'ict No. 7.
This section is designed to r.andle flows up to
6.72 million gallons per day ar.d viZZ serve pro-
posed Zand use development of the tributary area
to the year 2010.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Construction progress on this job has gone very well.
The contractor completed the tunnel under Chapman Ave.
during the month, and laid pipe north to Spring St.
and east on Spring St. to Hewes St. Total pipe laid
during April was 4657 feet .. As of the first week in
May, less than 1500 feet of pipe remain to be laid on
the job. Completion of the entire project is expected
by the e~d.of the month.
Numerous house laterals were discovered interferring
with the trunk line path on Spring St. The contractor
is remodeling these lines and extending them to connect
to city lines.
,•
SUMr\~ARY
TREATMENT PLANT WORK
Total Value Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Total Work During April
DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK
Total Value Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Total Work During April
TOTAL AMOUNT UNDER CONTRACT
$30,322,965
25,205,758
, 317,743
$17,369,814
9,441,009
4,582,052
$30,322,965
$17,369,814
$47,692,779
-~
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, AND 11
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIPORNIA
DISTRICT NO. 1
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 2
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 3
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 5
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 6
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 7
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 8
Directors present:
Directors absent:
MINUTES OF TIIE REGULAR MEETING
April 14, 1976 -7:30 p.m.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Califorrii~
ROLL CALL
Kcrm Rima (Chairman), Robert Battin,
John Garthe, and James Sharp
None
Michael Callahan (Chairman), Ralph Clark,
Vernon Evans, Donald Fox, Miriam Kaywood,
Bob Perry, George Scott, Don Smith, Henry
Wedaa, Donald Winn, Frances Wood, and
Robin Young •
None
Phillip Cox (Chairman), Carol Weddle,
Norman Culver, Vernon Evans, Henry Frese,
Miriam Kaywood, Alice MacLain, Thomas
McKnew, Richard Olson, Laurence Schmit,
Donald Shipley, Charles Stevens, Bernie
Svalstad, Frances Wood, and Martha Weishaupt
Stanley Meyer
Don Mcinnis (Chairman) and Robert Battin
Howard Rogers
Kerm Rima (Chairman pro tern), Don Mcinnis,
and Robert Battin
None
John Garthe (Chairman), Ralph Clark, Milan
Dostal, Francis Glockner, Donald Saltarelli,
John Burton, and Don Smith
None
llarold Edwards (Chairman) and Thomas Riley
Roy Holm
4/14/76
DISTRICT NO. 11
Directors present:
Directors absent:
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
Laurence Schmit (Chairman), Henry Duke,
and Norma Gibbs
None
Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne
Sylvester, Secretary, Ray Lewis, Rita
Brown, and Ted Francis
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel,
Harvey Hunt, Milo Keith, Gail Lynch, Don
Martinson, Donald Stevens, Ted Stevens,
and Alan Burns
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held at 7:30
p.m. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation, the roll was called ahd
the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District's Board.
DISTRICT 6
Appointment of
Chairman pro tern
DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 7
Excerpts re Board
Appointment
* * * * * * * * * * *
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
TI1at Director Rima be appointed Chairman
pro tern in the absence of Chairman Store.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the minute excerpts from the Cities
of Brea, Buena Park, Fullerton, Irvine,
La Habra, La Palma and Yorba Linda, be received and ordered filed; and that
the following representatives be seated as members of the Boards:
City District Active Alternate
Brea 2 Donald L. Fox Carol D. Weddle
3 Sam Cooper Carol D. Weddle
Buena Park 3 Stanley P. Meyer Jesse M. Davis
Fullerton 2 Frances Wood Robert E. Ward
3 Robert E. Ward Frances Wood
Irvine 7 John H. Burton David G. Sills
La Habra 2 Robin Young Beth Graham
3 Charles Stevens, Jr. Robin Young
La Palma 3 Henry Frese Alan Priest
Yorba Lind2. 2 Henry w. Wed a a Anton M. Groot
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
~rovnl of minutes
'I11at the minutes of the regular meeting
held ~larch 10, 1976 be approved as corrected.
-2-
4/14/76
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular meeting
held March 10, 1976 be approved as corrected.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular meeting
held March 10, 1976 be approved as corrected.
DISTRICT S Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular meeting
held March 10, 1976 be approved as corrected.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular meeting
held March 10, 1976 be approved as corrected.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular meeting
held March 10, 1976 be approved as corrected.
DISTRICT 8 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular meeting
held January 14, 1976 be approved as corrected.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular meeting
held March 10, 1976 be approved as corrected.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the
Joint ChaiTman
County to view our JPL-ACTS
The Joint Chairman reported that he and
staff members had met with key Environ-
mental Protection Agency officials from
Washington D. C. , who were in Orange
process facilities.
Chairman Winn also reported that the State Water Resources Control Board
has requested that the Districts consider proceeding with design of an
additional increment (SO MGD) of secondary treatment at Plant No. 2 if our
financial position will allow such an acceleration of facilities construction.
Following an announcement that an orientation session would be conducted
for new Directors in the near future, the Chairman advised that Executive
Committee members would be polled regarding a mutually convenient date for
the next committee meeting (tentative May 4).
-3-
4/16/76
ALL DISTRICTS TI1C General Manager reported further on
Report of the the meeting with Environmental Protection ~
General Manager Agency (EPA) officials regarding the JPL-
AClS process. EPA officials are enthu-
siastic about the project and were impressed with our ability to expe<lite
construction of the facility. Their staff members and auditors will be
reviewing the procedures followed by the Districts in order that they may
develop national policies in this regard.
Mr. Harper also reported on his attendance at the Association of Metropoli-
tan Sewerage Agencies' conference on sludge disposal conducted in Houston
earlier in the week. In attendance were Congressional representatives and
officials of federal regulatory bodies and local sewerage agencies. Needless
to say, there is no unanimity of opinion with regard to the best disposal
method.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the
General Counsel
regulations governing relocation
ALL DISTRICTS
Ratification of payment of
Joint Operating and Capital
Outlay Revolving Fund claims
The General Counsel briefly reported on
consent calendar items relative to amend-
ments to the procedures for collection
of delinquent obligations, and the
assistance and real property acquisitions.
Following a brief discussion relative to
the change in procedures for warrant
processing and approval, it was moved,
seconded, and duly carried:
That payment of the Districts' Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving
Fund claims on March 30, 1976, be ratified in the following total amounts:
Joint Operating
Capital Outlay Revolving
$73,759.22
24' 355. 72
$98,114.94
in accordance with said claims listed on Pages "A-1" through "A-3",
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Ratification of
payment of claims That payment of the District's Accwnulated
Capital Outlay Fund claims on March 30,
1976, be ratified in the amount of $2,132.00, in accordance with said
claims listed on Page "B-1", attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Ratification of
payment of claims ·nrnt payment of the District's Accumulated
Capital Outlay rund claims on March 30,
1976, be ratified in the amount of $2,500.76, in accordance with said
claims listed on Page "B-1", attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
-4-
4/14/76
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Ratification of
payment of claims That payment of the District's Operating
Fund claims on March 30, 1976, be ratified
in the amount of $69.33, in accordance with said claims listed on Page
"B-1", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Ratification of
payment of claims That payment of the District's Operating
Fund, Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund,
Fixed Obligation Fund, and Facilities Revolving Fund claims on March 30,
1976, be ratified in the following total amounts:
Operating Fund
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund
Fixed Obligation Fund
Facilities Revolving Fund
$ 330.00
167.00
10,000.00
102.56
$10,599.56
in accordance with said claims listed on Page "B-2", attached hereto and
made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Awarding sale of obsolete
NCR accounting equipment
be authorized as follows:
NCR-400 Accounting Machine
NCR-3300 Accounting Machine
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing staff to advertise
for purchase of three new
engines, re Specification No.
E-079
No. 2 (Specification No. E-079).
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing staff to negotiate
for purchase of two used engines
re Specification No. E-079; and
authorizing General Manager to
award purchase order contract
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That sale of obsolete NCR accounting
equipment to Turner Data Systems, Inc.
$125.00
25.00
Moved, seconded, and duly carried;
That the staff be authorized to advertise
for purchase of three new 650 horsepower,
dual fuel, gas engines for rehabilitation
of Rothrock Outfall Pumping Station, Plant
Moved, seconded, and duly carried;
That the staff be authorized to negotiate
with P & S Repair Service, Ft~ Worth,
Texas, for purchase of two used engines
for Rehabilitation of Rothrock Outfall
Pumping Station conforming to Specifi-
cation No. E-079 (in lieu of purchasing two new engines); and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be authorized to award a purchase
order contract for said engines in a total amount not to exceed $56~000
each plus tax and freight.
-5-
4/14/76
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing execution of
agreement with SCEC to
transfer Districts' interest
in power lines and estab-
lishing conditions therefor
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors adopt
Resolution No~ 76-54, approving and
authorizing execution of agreement to
transfer the Districts' interest in 12
KV 3-Phasc Power Linc between Plants Nos.
1 and 2 to the Southern California Edison Company, for consideration of
$11,500, and the condition that Southern California Edison Company provide
emergency and standby capabilities to the Districts. Certified copy of
this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Granting a one-half step
increase to Associate
Engineer
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That a one-half step increase be granted
to Districts' Associate Engineer, Nick
DiBenedetto, from Range 598, Step 3
($1583/mo.) to Step 3.5 ($1627/mo.) in recognition of achieving his pro-
fessional engineer's registration.
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving Change Order No. 6
to the plans and specifications
for Job No. Pl-16
Moved, seconded, and duiy carried:
That Change Order No. 6 to the plans and
specifications for 46 MGD Activated Sludge
Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job
No. Pl-16, authorizing a deduction of $30,000 from the contract with
Donovan Construction Company due to a change from ebullient cooling system
to jacket water cooling, be approved. Copy of this change order is attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
~oving Change Order No. 1
to the plans and specifications
for Job No. PW-046
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Demolition of Meter
Vaults and Shop at Reclamation Plant No.
1, Job No. PW-046, granting a time extension of 37 calendar days to the
contract with E & G Contractors, Inc. for delays in obtaining backfill
material, be approved. Copy of this change order is attached hereto and
made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Accepting Job. No. PW-046
as complete That the Boards of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-55, accepting Demoli-
tion of Meter Vaults and Shop at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-046,
as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approv-
ing Final Closeout Agreement. Certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving Addenda Nos. l and
2 to the plans and specifica-
tions for Job No. P2-8-8
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans
nnd specifications for Brookhurs t St rcct
Improvements in the City of Huntington
Beach, Job
the office
No. P2-8-8, be approved. Copies of the addenda are on file in
of the Secretary of the Districts.
-6-
4/14/76
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Awarding contract for
Job No. P2-8-8 That the Boards of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-56, to receive and
file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for
Brookhurst Street Improvements in the City of Huntington Beach, Job No.
P2-8-8, to Fleming Construction, in the amount of $141,441.10. Certified
copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Amending procedures for
the collection of
delinquent obligations
Moved, second~d, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-57, amending procedures
for the collection of delinquent obli-
gations owing to the Districts and repealing Resolution No. 75-145.
Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Amending regulations governing
relocation assistance and real
property acquisitions
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-58, amending regula-
tions governing relocation assistance
and r~al property
Certified copy of
these minutes.
acquisitions, as recommended by the General Counsel.
this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file written
report of the Executive
Conunittee
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing execution of
~reement \vi th SCAG re "208"
Areawide Planning
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the written report of the Executive
Conunittee, dated April 7, 1976, be
received and ordered filed.
The General Manager reported on develop-
ments relative to the State Water
Resources Control Board's conditional
designation of Southern California
Association of Governments (SCAG) as the
"208" Planning Agency for the South Coast Area, which includes Ventura,
Los Angeles, Orange, ~iverside and San Bernadina counties. Considerable
concern has been expressed by the local agencies which would participate
in the "208" planning over SCAG's response to the conditions set forth by
the State Board. Representatives of agencies in the four affected
counties have been meeting in this regard and have developed a revised
organizational chart relative to the proposed "208" planning process which
would provide required input and direction from local agencies.
Following further discussion, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Tliat the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-59, authorizing
execution of an agreement, in form approved by the General Counsel, with
the Southern California Association of Governments to participate in "208"
Areawide Planning for the South Coast Arca, subject to conditions speci-
fied by the Boards. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto
and made a part of these minutes.
-7-
4/14/76
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving Amendment No. 1 to
Agreement for Employment of
General Counsel
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Amendment No. 1 to Agreement for
Employment of General Counsel, dated
May 1, 1975, providing for an extension
of said agreement for an indefinite term beginning May 1, 1976, subject
to 30-day cancellation by either party, be approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1 be
authorized to execute said amendment.
ALL DISTRICTS
Declaring intent to assist the
Air Resources Board re air
Following a brief staff report, it was
moved, seconded, and duly carried:
quality maintenance plan That. the Boards of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-60, declaring intent
to assist the Air Resources Board re development and implementation of
an air quality maintenance plan covering the South Coast Air Basin.
Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report and recommendation of
the Building Committee re
Administrative and Engineering
Facility Study
Director Culver, Chairman of the Building
Committee, reported on activities of his
committee and requested the Districts'
Chief Engineer to review the report on
administrative and engineering facilities
study.
After the discussion which followed, it was moved, seconded, and duly
carried:
That the Building Committee's Administrative and Engineering Facilities
Study be ~eceived and ordered filed, and that the staff be authorized to
proceed with implementation of recommendations contained in said study,
as recommended by the Committee.
ALL DISTRICTS At 8: 45 p. m. , the Boards convened in
Convene in executive executive session to consider recommen-
session dation of Selection Committee re Employ-
ment of Engineer for Design of 75 MGD
Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Plant No. 2.
ALL DISTRICTS
Reconvene in executive
session
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing negotiation and award
of engineering contract for 75
MGD Activated Sludge Treatment
Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2
At 9:37 p.m., the Boards reconvened in
regular session.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-63, authorizing the
Selection Committee to negotiate with
John Carollo Engineers/Greeley and Hansen
for design of 75 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment F~Jcilities at Plant No. 2,
in accordance with established District procedures; and authorizing
District No. 1 to award contract for said work. Certified copy of this
resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
-8-
4/14/76
The Committee was requested to consider incorporating incentive prov1s1ons
into the contract which might save the Districts money in design or
construction costs.
Director Olson requested that his vote in opposition to the action be
made a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS
Declaring intent to depool
from the PERS State funding
pool and provide one year's
compensation for retirement
benefits
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-62, declaring intent
to approve an amendment to contract
between the Board of Administration of
the Public Employees Retirement System
and District No. 1 to depool from the State funding pool and providing
one-year final compensation basis for retirement benefits, preliminary
to transferring from PERS to County Retirement System. Certified copy
of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Deferring staff progress
report on JPL-ACTS Pilot
Plant facility
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file letter from
Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
re JPL-ACTS process
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff progress report on JPL-
ACTS Pilot Plant facility be deferred
to the regular meeting on May 12, 1976.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the letter from Jet Propulsion
Laboratory, dated March 4, 1976, request-
ing amendment to contract with NASA re
JPL-ACTS process, be received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS · Following a brief staff report, it was
moved, seconded, and duly carried: Authorizing amendment to
the contract with NASA re
JPL-ACTS process That the Boards of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-61, authorizing amend-
ment to the contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administra-
tion re JPL-ACTS process, increasing the maximum amount for services from
$280,000 to $333,726 to provide for startup and operational phase. Certi-
fied copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Establishing Class I
Penni t Fee That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-64-1, establishing
$50 Class I Permit Fee effective July 1, 1976, as provided in Section
302.S of the District's Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of
District Sewerage Facilities. Certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
-9-
4/14/76
DISTRICT 2 Moved, s~conded, and duly carried:
Establishing Class
I Permit Fee That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-65-2, establishing
$50 Class I Permit Fee effective July 1, 1976, ·as provided in Section
302.5 of the District's Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of
District Sewerage Facilities. Certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Establishing Class
I Permit Fee That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-66-3, establishing
$50 Class I Permit Fee effective July 1, 1976, as provided in Section
302.5 of the District's Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of
District Sewerage Facilities. Certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Establishing Class
I Permit Fee That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-67-5, establishing
$50 Class I Permit Fee effective July 1, 1976, as provided in Section
302.5 of the District's Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of
District Sewerage Facilities. Certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Establishing Class
I Permit Fee That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-68-6, establishing
$50 Class I Permit Fee effective July 1, 1976, as provided in Section
302.5 of .the District's Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of
District Sewerage Facilities. Certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Establishing Class
I Permit Fee That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-69-7, establishing
$50 Class I Permit Fee effective July 1, ·1976, as provided in Section
302.5 of the District's Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of
District Sewerage Facilities. Certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of t~cse minutes.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Establishing Class
I Permit Fee TI1at the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-70-11, establishing
$50 Class I Permit Fee effective July 1, 1976, as provided in Section
302.5 of the District's Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of
District Sewerage Facilities. Certified copy of this resolution is
att3ched hereto and made a part of these minutes.
-10-
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing General Manager to
enter into an agreement with
Orange County Vector Control
District, re production of
mosquitofish on District
property
4/14/76
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the letter from Orange County Vector
Control District, dated March 31, 1976,
requesting siie at Reclamation Plant No.
1 for pilot production of mosquitofish,
be received and ordered filed; and,
FURTIIER MOVED: That the General Manager be authorized to enter into an
agreement, in form approved by the General Counsel, with Orange County
Vector Control District providing a site for production of mosquitofish
on District property for a period of up to three and one-half years,
provided, however, that Vector Control District vacate the site if the
property is required by the Sanitation Districts.
ALL DISTRICTS
Granting emergency authority
for the General Manager to
negotiate substitute HMO
prepaid medical insurance plan
event Security Health Plan is
DISTRICT 1
Authorizing staff to solicit
engineering proposals for
preparation of right-of-way
document maps and records
DISTRICT 1
Authorizing staff to negotiate
an engineering fee re Raitt
Street Trunk Sewer
Trunk Sewer.
DISTRICT 1
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the General Manager be granted
emergency authority to negotiate an
agreement with a substitute provider for
~~10 prepaid medical insurance plan in the
unable to deliver services of their plan.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff be authorized to solicit
engineering proposals for preparation of
right-of-way document maps and records
for the District's trunk sewer facilities.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff be authorized to negotiate
an engineering fee with Boyle Engineering
Corporation for design of Raitt Street
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 5:00 p.m.,
April 21, 1976. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
9:45 p.m., April 14, 1976.
DISTRICT 5
Approving revised First Amended
Joint Exercise of Powers Agree-
ment Creating NIWA
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-78-5, approving and
authorizing execution of revised First
Amended Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating Newport-Irvine Waste-
Mnnagement Planning Agency (NIWA). Certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and m:.ide a part of these minutes.
-11-
4/14/76
DISTRICT 5
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m., April 14, 1976.
DISTRICT 6
Authorizing staff to solicit
engineering proposals for
preparation of right-of-way
document maps and records
DISTRICT 6
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff be authorized to solicit
engineering proposals for preparation of
right-of-way document maps and records
for the District's trunk sewer facilities.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Thaf this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m., April 14, 1976.
DISTRICT 8
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 8 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m., April 14, 1976.
DISTRICT 11
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m., April 14, 1976.
DISTRICT 3
Approving Change Order No. 2
to the plans and specifications
for Contract No. 3-21-1
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
11rnt Change Order No. 2 to the plans and
specifications for Westside Relief Inter-
ceptor, Reaches 25, 26 & Portion of 27,
Contract No. 3-21-2, authorizing an addition of $18,336.81 to the contract
with A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Company, be approved for addi-
tional work to install new techite force main and for traffic control
measures requested by the Cities of Los Alamitos and Seal Beach, and
granting a time extension of 69 calendar days to accomplish said work.
Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICT 3
Appr6ving Change Order No. 3
to the plans Rnd specifications
for Contract No. 3-21-1
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
TI1at Change Order No. 3 to the plans and
specifications for Westside Relief Inter-
ceptor, Reaches 25, 26 & Portion of 27,
Contract No. 3-21-1, authorizing an adjustme11t of engineer's quantities
for a total deduction of $7,000.00 from the contract with A. G. Tutor Co.,
Inc. f, N. M. Saliba Company, be approved. Copy of this change order is
attached hereto and mnde a p:i.rt of these minutes.
-12-
4/14/76
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Accepting Contract No.
3-21-1 as complete 1bat the Boards of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-74-3, accepting West-
side Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 & 27, Contract No. 3-21-1, as
complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving
Final Closeout Agreement. Certified copy of this resolution is attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 3
Authorizing acceptance of
Grant of Easement from John
L. Molinaro, et al., re
Contract No. 3-9
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-75-3, authorizing
acceptance of Grant of Easement from
John L. Molinaro, et al. for a permanent
easement in connection with construction of the Magnolia Relief Sewer,
Contract No. 3-9, at no cost to the District. Certified copy of this
resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 3
Awarding contract for Westside
Relief Interceptor, Portion of
Reach 27 and Reaches 28 & 29,
Contract No. 3-21-2
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-76-3, to receive and
file bid tabulation and recommendation,
and awarding contract for Westside
Relief Interceptor, Portion of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 & 29, Contract No.
3-21-2, to B & P Construction Company, in the amount of $1,177,745.00.
Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes.
DISTRICT 3
Authorizing General Manager to
award contract for Manhole
Replacement, Los Alamitos Sub-
Trunk, Contract No. 3-SR-1
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-77-3, authorizing the
General Manager to award and execute a
contract in form approved by the General
Counsel for Manhole Replacement, Los Alamitos Sub-Trunk, Contract No.
3-8R-1, to the lowest responsible bidder in an amount not to exceed
$15,000.00. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and
made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 3
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:47 p.m., April 14, 1976.
DISTRICT 7
Authorizing acceptance of
Grant of Easement from Julia
Ann Hyde, re offsitc sewer
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-69-7, authorizing
acceptance of Grant of Easement from
Julia Ann Hyde, for a permanent easement for offsite sewer service in
connection with the sewer line in Circula Panorama in the Cowan Heights
area, at no cost to the District.
-13-
4/14/76
DISTRICT 7
Receive and file request
from The Warmington Company
for annexation of territory
to the District, anc.l refer
to staff
Canyon Road, be received,
and recommendation.
DISTRICT 7
Approving Addendum No. 1 to
the plans and specifications
for Contract No. 7-6-9
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the request from The Warmington
Company for annexation of approximately
22 acres of territory to the District
in the vicinity of Chapman Avenue and
the proposed extension of Crawford
ordered filed and referred to staff for study
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Tustin-Orange Trunk
Sewer, Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches
15 and 16 (From Spring Street to Linda Vista Street), Contract No. 7-6-9,
be approved. J\ copy of the addendum is on file in the office of the
Secretary of the Districts.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Awarding Contract No.
7-6-9 That the Board of Directors adopt
Standard Resolution No. 76-80-7, to
receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract
for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 & 16
(From Spring Street to Linda Vista Street), Contract No. 7-6-9, to Sully-
Miller Contracting Company, in the amount of $295,826.40. Certified copy
of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Establishing new policy re
Directors' Compensation That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-81-7, establishing
compensation and expense reimbursement policies for its Directors, and
repealing Resolutions Nos. 73-53-7 and 76-52-7.
DISTRICT 7
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:48 p.m., April 14, 1976.
DISTRICT 2
Receive and file letter from
City of Vi11a Park, re a1mex-
ation of Tract No. 7350
and ordered filed.
DISTRICT 2
Receive and file staff
report re annexation
of Tract No. 7350
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the letter from the City of Villa
Park, dated March 30, 1976, relative to
annexation of Tract No. 7350, be received
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff report, dated April 7,
1976, regarding annexation of Tract No.
7350 within the City of Villa Park to
County Sanitation District No. 2, be received and ordered filed.
-14-
:
4/14/76
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Waiving connection fees
for Tract No. 7350 That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-71-2, declaring
special exception for Tract No. 7350 an<l waiving connection fees therefor.
Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes.
DISTRICT 2
Authorizing initiation of
proceedings re Annexation
No. 13
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-72-2, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex
approximately 10.868 acres to the District in the vicinity of Santiago
Boulevard and Patrician Drive (Proposed Annexation No. 13 -Tract No.
7350 to County Sanitation District No. 2), and setting fees therefor in
the amount of $214.00 per acre. Certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2
Declaring intent to levy
sewer service charge against
developed properties in Tract
No. 7350 if not annexed
erties in Tract No. 7350 if
is not completed.
DISTRICT 2
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors hereby
declares its intent to levy sewer
service charge in the amount of $10 per
unit per month against developed prop-
proposed Annexation No. 13 -Tract No. 7350
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:48 p.m., April 14, 1976.
-1.5-
of Directors,
Districts Nos.
and 11
-WARRANT NO.
-.168
29169
29170
29171
29172
29173
·29174
29175
,29176
29177
29178
29179
29180
29181
29182
29183
29184
29185
29186
29187
29188
29189
29190
29191
29192
29193
29194
29195
29196
29197
29198
29199
29200
29201
29202
29203
29204
29205
29206
29207
29208
,29209
. 29210
29211
. ·29212
29213
29214
29215
~9216
.._,9217
29218
29219
29220
29221
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCH 30, 1976
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Air California, Air Fare, Various Meetings
Alex Fish Company, Lab Supplies
Allied Supply Company, Valve & Pipe Supplies
American Cyanamid Company, Chemical Flocculants
American Lock & Supply, Inc., Hardware
City of Anaheim, Power
Anaheim Sewer Construction, Lateral Repair
The Anchor Packing Co., Gaskets
Applied Science Labs, Lab Supplies
Bank of America, Bond & Coupon Collection
Beckman Instruments, Instrumentation Supplies
Blue Diamond Materials, Concrete
Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Magneto Repair
State of Calif. Public Employees' Retirement System,
Actuarial Study
C & R Reconditioning Company, Pump Repair
C S Company, Valve & Pump Parts
CWPCA, Conference Registration
Cal's Cameras, Photo Processing & Supplies
Cantrall Corp., Conveyor Parts
Century Aero, Electric Supplies
Coast Nut & Bolt, Hardware
College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials
Commercial & C B Communications, Communication Equipment
Consolidated Electrical Distbrs., Electric Supplies
Continental Chemical Co., Chlorine
F. B. Cook Corp., Manhole Repair
Coordinated Equipment Co., CAL/OSHA Testing
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplies
Daily Pacific Builder, Engineering Proposal Notice
Data Supp.lies & Systems, Inc., Printing
Nick Di Benedetto, Employee Mileage
The Drawing Board, Office Supplies
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies
Electric Supplies Distributing, Electric Supplies
Electronic Business Machines, Calculator
Engineering News Record, Legal Ad
Enterprise Printing Company, Printing
Farrow Engineering, Filters
Filter Supply Co., Filters
Fischer & Porter Company, Metering Supplies & Charts
Clifford A. Forkert, Right-of-Way Services
The Foxboro Company, Electric Supplies
General Electric Supply, Electric Supplies
General Telephone Company
M. E. Gray Co., Pipe Supplies
Graybar Electric Co., Electric Supplies
Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Parts
Hanson· Water Works, Pipe Supplies
Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal
Hewlett Packard, Lab Supplies
Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tj_res
Honeywell, Inc., Strip Charts
House of Batteries, Batteries
"A-1"
$
AMOUNT
53.90
79.50
289.21
4,946.35
46.89
115.67
475.00
16.42
80.15
181.92
71.72
59.32
149.78
294.oo
150.00
178.93
318.75
133.62
470.23
111.83
229.41
201.73
63.60
1,647.15
l0,839.86
1,235.00
1,335.00
433.01
40.00
280.00
654.04
56.82
26.40
931.67
56.07
68.85
184.50
63.12
1,928.87
23.35
375.29
2,503.87
139.39
197.92
3,549.24
433.14
209.81
21.48
29.87
105.00
155.02
108.42
77.09
22.13
WARRANT NO.
29222
29223
29224
29225
29226
29227
.29228
29229
29230
29231
29232
29233
29234
29235
29236
29237
29238
29239
29240
292J-i1
29242
29243
29244
29245
29246
29247
29248
29249
29250
29251
29252
29253
29254
29255
29256
29257
29258
29259
29260
29261
29262
29263
29264
29265
29266
29267
29268
29269
29270
29271
29272
29273
29274
29275
29276
29277
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCH 30, 1976
IN FAVOR OF
Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies, Tools & Valves $
Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Equipment Rental
Hurley Electronics, Inc., Electric Supplies
Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Freight
Jensen Instrument Company, Controls
Kenics Corporation, Polymer Mixer
King Bearing, Inc., Bearings & V-Belts
Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies
Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tools & Equipment Repair
L & N Uniforms Supply Co., Uniform Service
Judy Lee, Employee Mileage
Metermaster, Inc., Equipment Repair
Morgan Equipment Company, Equipment Parts
National Chemsearch, Cleaner
City of Newport Beach, Water
Office Equipment Specialists, Equipment Repair
Orange County Farm Supply Co., Weed Killer
Orange County Stamp Co., Rubber Stamps
Oreo Plastics, Plexiglass
Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies
Pacific Telephone Company
M. C. Patten Corporation, Gauges
Paulsen Wire Rope Corp., Wire Rope
Petroleum Dynamics, Compressor Parts
Pickwick Paper Products; Janitorial Supplies
Printec Corporation, Reproduction Supplies
The Republic Supply Co,, Pipe Supplies
Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Steel
Richey Electronics, Inc., Electric Supplies
Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts
Sand Dollar Business Forms, Printing
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motors & Pump Repair
Sargent Welch Scientific Co., JPL Instruments & La.b Supplies
Saunders Distributing Co., Inc., Equipment Parts
Scientific Products, Lab Supplies
Scott Refrigeration Service, Inc., Equipment Repair
Sears, Roebuck and Company, Tools
See Optics, Safety Glasses
Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Supplies
John Sigler, Employ2e Mileage
Signal-Flash Company, Barricade Rental
Sims Industrial Supply, Sand Blasting Materials
Singer Mailing Equipment, Postage Meter
Southern California Edison Company
Southern California Gas Company
Southern California Water Company
Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water
Speed-E-Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Standard Concrete Material, Concrete
Standard Oil Company of California, Diesel Fuel, Gas & Oil
State Compensation Insurance Fund, Additional Deposit
Sterling Art & Engineering Supplies, Drafting Supplies
The Suppliers, Hardware, Tools & Chain
Thompson Lacquer Company, Paint Supplies
Triangle Steel & Supply Coo, Steel
"A-2"
AMOUNT
3,506.18
71.r
303.~
14.85
102.91
500.40
316.12
210.01
48.92
707.75
1, 520. 75·
13.65
67.16
94.02
373.12
9.00
29.50
. 97. 31
100.56
30.95
102.30
8.62
143.92
406.22
15.58
131.18
486.65
135.00
15.89
76.06
186.76
410.22
623.57
120.85
128.oo
106.07
112.00
166.90
14.05
584.93
57.00
26.00
90.10
60.42
13, 048. 69.
318.05
3.2~
127 .11·
25.23
197.00
1,480.69
175.r
62.~
928.40
92.11
63.75
WARRANT NO.
29278
9279 ~9280
29281
29282
29283
29284
. 29285
29286
. 292ts7
'• 29288
29289
29290
29291
29292
29293
29294
29157
29158
29159
29160
29161
29162
29163
29164
29165
29166
29167
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCH 30, 1976
IN FAVOR OF
Truck & Auto Supply, Truck Parts
J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Safety Equipment
Union Oil Company of California, Gasoline
United Parcel Service, Freight-Out
United States Elevator Corp., Maintenance Agreement
United States Equipment, Inc., Gaskets
VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies
Varec, Inc., Compressor Parts
Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage
Warren and Bailey Co., Inc., Tubing
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts
Western Electronic Supply Corp., Electric Supplies
Western Salt Company, Salt
Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Supplies
Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing
Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Services
George Yardley Associates, Metering Supplies
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Almquist Tool & Equipment Co., Drill Grinder
Fairbanks Morse Pump Division, Retention PW-045
Forkert Engineering, Engineering Services P2-8-8
J. B. Gilbert & Associates, Fae. Plan & P2-23 EIR
Lowry & Associates, Engr. Services, Fae. Plan
Motorola, Inc., Mobile Radio & Communication Equipment
Pepsi Co~ Bldg. Systems, Inc., JPL Office Rent
Southern Calif. Testing Lab., Testing Pl-16
Travel Buffs, Pl-16 Inspection Expense
Twining Laboratories, Testing Pl-16
Wyle Laboratories, Pl-16 Consultant
TOTAL CORF
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF
"A-3"
$
AMOUNT
449.97
404.81
44.77
107 .49
33.00
78.97
106.00
81.31
14.55
63.39
816.61
179.67
114.88
490.96
3,827.46
1,554.25
93.83
$ 73,759.22
$ 1,348.12
1,474.40
418. 38
11,611.91
4,350.00
2,871.25
191.80
29.70
354.10
40.00
1,666.oo
$ 24,355.72
$ 98,114.94
INDIVlDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCH 30, 1976
DISTRICT NO. 2
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
29142 Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 2-14-3, 2-14-4
DISTRICT NO. 3
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
29143 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-20-2
29144 City of Garden Grove, Pavement Striping 3-20-1
DISTRICT NO. 5
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
29145 Daily Pilot, Publish Ordinance 509
"B-1"
$
$
2,132.00
~'
229.91
2,270.84
$ 2,500.75
$ 69.33
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCH 30, 1976
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
29146 State of California, Annexation 39 Processing Fee
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
29147 Donald Cray, Refund Annexation Fee Overpayment
FIXED OBLIGATION FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
29148 City of Anaheim, Annual JOS Payment
2914-9 City of Buena Park, Annual JOS Payment
29150 City of Fullerton, Annual JCS Payment
29151 Garden Grove Sanitary District, Annual JOS Payment
29152 City of La Habra, Annual JOS Payment
29153 City of Orange, Annual JOS Payment
29154 City of Placentia, Annual JOS Payment
29155 City of Santa Ana, Annual JOS Payment
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
29156 The Register, Bid Notice 7-6-9
$
$
$
AMOUNT
330.00
167.00
1,561.80
96.70
1,561.80
241.80
386.90
1,474.70
241. 80
4,434.50
$ 10,000.00
$ 102.56
$ 10,599.56
MEMORANDUM
April 29, 1976
TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager
FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
(.;QUNTY !SANITATION UISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71") 5.C0-2910
(71.C) 962-2'411
SUBJECT: Capital Outlay Revolving Fund, Fiscal Year 1976-77
In March of 1974 the Districts forwarded to the State Water Resources Control
Board and EPA a project report for improved treatment of Plant No. 2. This
project report called for an expenditure of $275 million to meet the State and
Federal requirements for ocean discharge.
Based upon this report and the needs surveys for treatment facilities required
to meet the discharge requirements, the Districts facilities have been included
in the project list as adopted by the State B~ard and as approved by the EPA
for the following projects:
1.
2.
3.
4.
s.
6.
75 MGD of secondary treatment at Plant No. 2
24 MGD expansion of premary treatment at Plant No. 2
Phase 2 expansion of primary flows at Plants Nos. 1 & 2
Secondary treatment of Plants Nos. 1 & 2
Expansion in improved treatment including headworks
addition at Plant No. 1
Expansion and improvement of secondary treatment at
Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Phase 2
Total
$. 73,800,000
4,400,000
24,400,000
36,900,000
·125' 000' 000
125,000,000
$389,500,000
Although the project list as approved by the State may not represent the true
project cost, it does indicate an extreme high level of construction activities
for the joint works facilities.
The Board has recently approved the design effort for 75 MGD of improved treatment
at Plant No. 2 which the cstimatec.l construction cost is approximately $6V.2 million.
The State has requested that we analyse our cash flow situ~tion in order that we
might consider the commencing of the design of an ad<lition3.l SO MGD a day of
improved treatment at Plant No. 2 in August of this year pending the rcsul ts of the
CoMMI TTEE ft,GENDA ITEM tlo. 1
...
Fred A. Harper
Apri 1 29, 1976
Page Two
JPL-ACTS Process Pilot Plant effort. It is estimated that this second phase
of improved treatment at Plant No. 2 will be approximately $50 million. The
State as well as the EPA is most anxious to obligate grant construction funding
before the September 30, 1977 deadline in order that the State of California
does not lose its allocation as provided by the Congress 1972 amendment to the
Clean Water Act. If the Districts are to proceed to meet the NPDES discharge
requirements and to contract for pver $100 million in the swnmer of 1977, the
CORF budget must be increased considerably over what has been experienced in
the past few years. 1be past CORF budgest adopted by the Boards raised by
taxes are as follows:
1968-69
1969-70
1970-71
1971-72
1972-73
1973-74
1974-75
$4,180,000
3,800,000
3,800,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
2,500,000
2,500,000
It is estimated that the CORF budget for the 1976-77 fiscal year will be
approximately $6, 000, 000. It is suggested that the staff present the capital
expenditure program to the Executive Committee at their scheduled meeting of
May 4th in order that they may apprise the Joint Board as to the level of
effort involved with meeting the clean water bond laws of the State and EPA.
REL:ss
RtCHARO 0. ,.RAZ EE
STEPHEN C.STEWART
TtiOMAS L. WOOORUF'I"'
.JE,.,.REY A, HARTMAN
LAW OFF"ICES
Stcwcl rt, '\T ooJ ruff & f rdzcc
1055 NORTH MAIN STREET, SUITE 1020
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701
April 29, 1976
Boards of Directors .
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
P. o. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject: Adoption of Conflict of Interests Code
AREA COOE 714
835•0ZIZ
As each of you has been made aware, the provisions of the Political
Reform Act of 1974 (Proposition 9) are now being implemented and
specifically require all local public agencies to adopt a conflict
of interest code that will apply to its officers and employees.
On behalf of the County Sanitation Districts, the code will be
adopted by the Board of Directors of each District and will be
submitted to the Orange County Board of Supervisors for their
review and approval. The Board of Supervisors has established
the date of August 1, 1976 as the final date for submission of
the District's code.
The ExecU'ti ve Cornmi ttee is being requested to review the draft
of the code which is the basis upon which the specific code will
be submitted to the full Boards at the meeting of June. This
draft code is the product of the Attorneys Committee for the
California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) and, in
my opinion, is the best product of efforts to have a comprehen-
sive yet simplified set of rules. It is considerably more
specific than the model code proposed by the League of California
Cities and, while a few paragraphs will need to be changed to
more precisely identify the factual situation with our Districts,
the substance is basically being recommended by my office.
It now appears that the code will be made to apply to the super-
visory category employees of the District, in view of the fact
that they generally have the ability to make or participate in
the making of decisions which could foreseeably have a material
effect on a financial interest of the person holding their
position. Additionally, a few other categories will necessarily
CoMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM No. 2
Boards of Directors
April 29, 1976
Page Two
have to be included because of the particular responsibilities
of the jol:Gmeeting the same criteria.
It is also being recommended that the code to be adopted by the
Districts will require the consultants to the Districts, such as
engineering firms and general counsel, be made to comply with all
of its provisions. I do point out, however, that there are some
exceptions, such as a consultant who owns less than a 10% interest
in the firm which is being retained by the District need not
disclose, on the basis of a minimum involvement.
With regard to the form of the reporting requirements, it is
· substantially similar to that presently being required of ·most
Directors in their capacities as members of the City Councils.
Finally, with respect to the adoption of the code, we are, as
noted above, required to submit our adopted code to the Board
of Supervisors by August 1, 1976. However, the code that will
be submitted to the Board for approval will include my recom-
mendation that it not become effective as a law governing the
officers and employees of the District until January 1, 1977.
This recom,.~endation is based primarily upon the fact that no
effective date is required as a matter of State law and,
secondly, it will avoid one additional filing during 1976
in view of the num~rous filings that have already been made
by most Directors. Likewise, the actual filing date is not
yet determineG, but at this point it would appear that the
month of 'April will be selected as the annual anniversary
date. The purpose of this is to coincide with the reporting
dates that.the Directors will experience as members of the
City Councils and, therefore, will prevent an unnecessary
amount of duplicate efforts spread through several months
of the year.
TLW:·ab
l~Jo(:~. A~mas L. Woodruff
General Counsel
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0 . BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS A V ENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92706
(714) 540-2910
May 5, 1976
REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: May 4, 1976
Directors present: Directors absent:
Donald Winn, Joint Chairman Kerm Rima
Norma B. Gibbs, Vice Joint Chairman
Phillip Cox
John Garthe
Supv. Laurence J. Schmit
Convened : 5:30 p.m.
Adjourned: 7:40 p.m.
Others present:
Milan Dostal, Director
Vernon Evans, Director
Fr ed A. Harper, Ge neral Manager
J. Wayne Sylvester, Director of
Finance
Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
Thomas L. Woodruff, Ge neral Counsel
********************
1. Treatment Plant Capital Outlay Budget for 1976-77.
(714) 962-2411
The staff reported that they are in the process of preparing
budge t recommendations for the 1976-77 Joint Operations and Joint
Construction budgets which will be considered by the Executive
Committee in the latter part of May. The recent acceleration of
the State and Federal construction grant program has made the
Districts' long -range cash -flow projections for the Joint Works
construction program invalid . The staff estimated that it will
be necessary to incr e ase the Districts' tax contribution to the
Capital Out l ay Revolving Fund budget from $2.5 million to $6 million
per year for the next 3-5 years. The long-range planning projections
anticipated some of this increase and reserves have been set up in
the individual Districts ' Accumulated Capital Out l ay funds. How-
ever, at least 3 Dis tric ts will have difficulty making t heir con-
tributions without rescheduling District p roj ects or seeking new
revenues. Attached is a brief staff report concerning the. accelerated
construction program.
2. Consideration of a Conflict of Interest Code.
The General Counsel is recommending adoption of the enclosed
~onflict of Interest Code which has been dev eloped by the Attorneys
Committee of the California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA)
to comply with the requirements of Chapter 7, Title 9 of the Govern-
ment Code. Attached is a report from -Mr .-Woodruff. -
Following a lengthy discussion concerning whether or not the
District Directors will be required to file as Directors of the
Sanitation Districts, and at the same· time, file as elec ted officials
of their respective entities, the Committee directed the General
Counsel to seek a Legal Opinion from the Fair Political Practices
Commission, since reporting by Direct'ors would appear to be a
duplication, and redundant.
The Committee took no action to recommend the adoption of t he
proposed Conflict of Interest Code. However, the Committee recog-
nizes the need to proceed toward adoption of the Code prior to
August 1st of this year; therefore, the Committee r ecommends
adoption of a resolution establishing June 9th, which is the regular
Joint Board meeting date, for a public heari ng to receive comments
from the public and District employees. The staff has recommended
that all personnel in Management and supervisory classifications
be required to file in accordance with the Code.
3, Request of the Garden Grove Sanitary Distr ict for Waiver
of Connection Fees.
At the March 30th meeting of the Executive Committee, considera-
tion was givefl to a request from the Garden Grove Sanitary District
for waiver of connection charges for 21 existing homes in a pro-
posed sewer assessment District. The Committee directed the staff
to obtain information concerning the amount of property taxes paid
---·
the Districts for the subject properties. The staff has determined
that something less than $1,000 taxes have been paid by the subject
properties since the inception of the District for operation and
maintenance of a sewer system from which these properties have received
no benefit to date.
The General Counsel advised the Committee that it wou ld require
an amendment to the Districts' ordinances to permit credit for prior
taxes paid, which would apply to the issuance of all permits . Some
credit would have to be determined each time a permit was applied
for, thereby making the permit process unwieldy, time consuming, and
very costly. While t he Committee is in sympathy with the request of
the Garden Grove Sanitary District, it is the Committee's recommenda-
tion that their request for waiver of fees be respectfully denied.
-2-
Vice Chairman Gibbs requested that the minutes of the
Executive Committee reflect her support of the request of the
Garden Grove Sanitary Di strict.
4. Amending Agreement with J. R. Gilbert and Associates
Dated March 26, 1975.
On March 26 , 1 975, the Boards authorized the engagement of
J. R. Gilbert and Associates to prepare the Environmental Im pact
Statement for the Districts' Facilities Plan . The Environmental
Impact Statement is being prepared j o intly with the Environmental
Protection Agency and funded with 87\% State and Federal Step I
grant fund s. In rec e nt discussions with the State and EPA, the
scope of the Envir onmental Impact Statement has been expanded at
EPA's insistence involving additional work for the consulting firm.
Attached is a staff explanation of t h e req uired add itional work and
the estimated costs associated with same . ·
With reference to th e s t a ff memorandum, i t is apparent that
EPA is responsible for the ultimate sign-off on the fina l Environ-
mental Impact Stateme nt for the constr uction of future facilities
at the two treatment plants ; therefore, EPA can require the expen-
diture of additional monies to satisfy their requirements. While the
Committee is not pleased with th e expansion of the scope of the
Env ironmental Impact Statement and the added costs, it is recom-
mended that the agreement with J. R. Gilbert Associates dated March
26, 1 975 , be amended to increase the agreed-upon maximum amoun t
from $60,000 to $15 0 ,000, subject to per diem rates established
March 26 , 1975, plus printing expenses not to exceed $35 ,0 00 .
5. Authority to Pay Directors Compensation and Per Diem
When Pa rticipating in Activities to the Benefit of the Districts.
Staff Report -Presently, the General Manager has the authority
to designate me mbers of the Boards and staff to attend meetings,
conferences, and other functions within the State o f California
which will be of value to the Districts . It is requested that this
authority be extended to provide when the General Manager requests
attendance by Directors, with the concurrence of the Joint Chairman ,
that Directors attending will be paid compensat i on and expense
reimbursement pursuant to exist i ng Districts ' resolutions establishing
compensation and expense reimbursement polic i es.
We are requesting this p rovision to remove any doubt or concern
when a Director is asked to serve or represent the Districts at a
function within the State, that the y be assur ed of allowab l e com -
pensation and expense reimbursement. Currently, the authority rests
with the Board(s) and authorization for payment of compensation for
attendance at meetings mu st either be approved in advance or re-
quested after the date of participation .
-3-
Committee Recommendation -The Committee concurs in the staff's
r ecommendation to adopt a resolution authorizing paid compensation and
expense reimbursement as outlined .
-4-
WJML:~~w:ra l/~1110
Rev. 2/ 2/76
CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
OF nm
----~--~~~~~--~~~~~~---
DISTRICT
ARTICLE I--GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 1.1. Authority. This Code is adopted pursuant to,
··and :i.n implementation of, Article 3 (commencing with Section 87300)
of Chapter 7,. Title 9 of the Government Code of the State of
California.
Section 1.2. Effect. This Code isin addition to State
and local laws pertaining to conflicts ·of interest of. District
officers and employees and is not intended to abridge or otherwise
modify such laws.
Section l. 3. Severability. If any article,, section, subsec-
tion, paragraph, subparagraph, sentence •.. clause or phrase of this
Code is for any reason held to be invalid, unconstitutional or
unenforceable, such decision shall not a~fect the validity of the
r~maining portions of this Code. The District declares that it
would have adopted this Code and each article, section, subsection,
·.paragraph, subparagraph, sentence, clause and phrase thereof
irr.cspective of the fact any one or more of such portions of this
Code be declared invalid, unconstitutional or unenforceable.
Section l. lt-. Effective Date. ·This Code shall take effect
upon its approval by the Board of Supervisors of the County.
Section 1.5. Definitions. As used in this Code, unless
the context othcrwis~ clearly implies, the following words and
terms shall have the meanings set forth herein.
(a) Business ent~. "Business entity" means any
organization or enterprise operated for .profit, ~ncluding but not
limited to a proprietorship, partnership, firm, business trust,
joint venture, syndicate, ·corpor3tion or association.
(b) Consultant. "Consultant" means a p~sition established
by contract with the District pursuant to which contract information,
advice, reconnnendation or counsel is provided to the District;
provided, however, that "consultant" shall not include a position
in which the person providing such information, advice, recommend-
ation or counsel:
(1) conducts research· and arrives at conclu-
sions with ·respect to his or her rendition of information,
. .
advice, recorrnnendation or counsel independent of the control
and direction of the District or of any District official,
other than normal contract monitoring; and
(2) possesses no authority with respect to
any Dis.trict decision beyond the rendition of information,
advice, recommendation or counsel. ·
(c) County. "County'~ means the county in whiGh this
· District is located.
(d) . Designated employee. "Designated employee" means
a natural person holding, or representing a business entity which
h~lds, a designated position.
(e) Designated position. "Designated position" means
a position within the District specified in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto. Designated positions are deemed to involve the making or
participation in the making of decisioris which may foreseeably have
a material effect on a financial interest of the designated employee
holding such position.
(f) Disclosure statements. "Disclosure statements"
mean statements disclosing reportable interests required, by
Section 2 .1, to be filed by designated employees.
(g) District. "District" means this District.
(h) Reportable interests. "Reportable interests"
mean invcstmenti, interests in real property and income required
to be disclosed by designated employees. "Reportable interests"
I o
as to any particular designated employee means those.categories
of such interests assigned, by Exhibit "A" attached hereto, to the
designated position held by such employee. "Reportable interests' as
to any particular employee are deemed by said assignment to be
affected foresccably and materially by any decision made or parti-
cipated in by the designated employee by virtue of his or her
position.
(i) Secretary. "Secretary" means that officer of . . .. .
.this District responsible for Di~tri~~ files and records.
ARTICLE II--DISCLOSURE
Section 2.1. Disclosure Statements. Each designated·
employee .shall file an initial statement and annual statements
disclosing those reportable interests in the category or categories
of reporta~le interests, more particularly described in Section 2.5,
which are assigned by Exhibit "A" hereof to the designated position
·held by such c~ployee. In the event a designated employee does not
have any such reportable interests, such statements n~ed not be
fil~d. · Such statements shall be filed at the place specifi~d in
Section 2·. 2 and at the times spe_cified_ in Section ·2. 3 and Section
2.4, shall contain the information specified in Section 2 .. 6 through
Section 2.8, and shall be in the form specified in Section 2.9.
Section 2.2. Place of Filing. Disclosure statements
shall be filed, ~n the original, with th.e. Secretary_, who shall
receive such statements on behalf of the District. The Secretary
shall make and retain a copy of each disclosure statement so
filed and shall forward the original thereof to tbe Board of
Supervisors of the County.
Section 2.3. Time of Filing Initial Statements. (a) In
General. Each designated employee havin~ reportable interests shall
filo an initial disclosure statement within thirty' (30) days after
the effective date of this Code.
-3-
(b) Civil Service Employees. Each civil service
employee who assumes a designated position more than thirty (30)
days after the effective date of the Cod~ and.who has reportable
interests at the time of assuming such position shall file an
initial disclosure statement within thirty (30) days after assuming
such position.
(c) Other Employees. Each employee who is not a
civil service employee, who assumes a designated position more ..
-~han thirty (30) days after the effective date of this Code, and
r-:i.-. ·who has reportable interests at the time of assuming such position
.shall file an initial disclosure statement not less than ten (10)
'days before assuming such position, unless an earlier assumption
.of such position is required, in which event, the initial disclosure
~tatement shall be file~ within 30 days of assuming the designated
position.
Section 2.4. Time of Filing Annual· Statements. An annual
~isclosure statement shall be filed in the month of February of
each year by each designated employee who acquired, received or held a
reportable interest during the preceding calendar.year whether or
.not such ~eportable interest was disposed of .during such calendar
year and whether or not the designated employee ·filed an initial
-<-Statement pursuant to Section 2.3.
·section 2.5. Categories of Reportable Interests. Reportable
~nterests are divided into the following categories:
(a) Category I: Interests in Real Property. Interests
in real property are reportable interests if;
(1) the real property to.which the interest
.-pertains is located in part or in whole, (A) within the boundaries
of the ·District, (B) within two miles of the boundaries of the
District, -or (C) within two miles ·of land located outside -of the
boundaries of the District which is owned or. used by the District;
(2) the fair market value of thri interest of the
-designated employee or his or her spbusc i9 greater than One Tl1ousand
-4-
..
•.
·. ~i.'.
Dollars ($1,000); and
(3) the interest is either: (A) a leasehold,
beneficial or ownership interest held by the designated employee
or his or her spouse, (B) an option held. by the designated employee
or his or her spouse to acquire such an interest,· or (C) an interest
or option held by a business entity or ~rust in which the designated
. employee or his or her spouse owns directly, indirectly or benefi-
cially, a ten ·percent (10%) interes~ o: greater;·provided, however,
that "·in the event that the ownership interest of the designated
employee or his or her spouse in such business entity or trust is
less than fifty percent (50%), the value, for the purpose of para-
graph (2), of the real property interest or .option relates to the
value of the pro rata share of th~ designated employee or his or
her spouse in the real property interest or option held by the
business ·entity or trust; and provided further, that in the event
that the ownership interest of the designated employee or his or
her spouse in such business entity or trust is fifty percent (50%)
or more, the value, for the purpose of paragraph (2), of the real
property .interest or option relates to the entire·value of the real
property iriterest or opti~n held by the business entity or trust.
(b) Category II: Investments. Investments in business
entities are reportable if:
(1) the business entity, including parent corpora-
tions, subsidiary corporations or otherwise ·related business
entities, (A) has an interest in real property located in part or
in whole within the boundaries of the District, within two miles
thereof or within two miles of land. owned or used by the District,
(~) does business or plans to do business within the District, or
(C) ha~ done business within the District at any time .during the
~wo years.prior to the time that the disclosure statement-of the
designated employee is filed;
(2) the f nir market value of the investment of
-5-
..
the designated employee or his or her spouse is greater.than One
Thousand Dollars ($1,000); and
(3) ~he investment either (A) is held by the desig-
nated employee or his or her spouse and constitutes a financial
interest in, or security issued by, the business ~ntity, including
but not limited to cormnon stock. prefer~e:d s·tock, rights, warrants,
options, debt instruments and any partnership or other ownership
·interest; or (B) is held by any .business entity or trust in which the
designated employee or his or her spouse owns, directly, indirectly
or beneficially,· a ten percent (10%) interest or greater, and con-
stitutes a financial interest in, or security·issued by, a business
entity qualifying under paragraph (2) above, provided, however,
that in the event that the ownership interest of the designated
employee or his or her spouse in su~h business entity or trust is
less than fifty percent (50%), the value, for the purpose of'
paragraph (2), of the investment relates to the value of the pro
rata share of the designated employee.or his or her spouse in the
investment held by the busi?ess e~tity or trust; and provided
further, that in the event that the owne~ship intere.st of ~he desig-
nated employee or his or her spouse in such business entity or
trust is fifty percent (50%) or more,· the value, fdr the purpose of
paragraph (2), of the investment relates to the entire value of the
investment held by.the business entity or trust.
An investment is not.~eportable if it constitutes·
a time or demand deposit in a financial institution, a share in a
credit union, an insurance policy, or a bond or other debt instru-
ment issued by any government or government agency.
(c) Category III: Sources of Income. Sources of income
are reportable if:
(1) the source of income was either (A) a business
entity located o~ doing business as described in subsection (b) {1)
(B) an individual residing.within the District, or (C) a non-profit
-6-
association or corporation having its principal place of business
within the District;
(2) either (A) the aggregate amount of income
received by the designated employ~e or his or her spouse from the
source during the period covered by the disclosuri statement was
Two Hundred Fifty Dollars .. ($250) or more in value, or (B) if the
. income was a gift received by the· designated employee or his or her
npouse from the source during the pe~io~ covered·by the disclosure
statnient, the value of the gift was Twenty-Five Dollars ($25) or
more; and
(3) the income was either received by (A) the
designated employee or his or her spouse, o~ (B) received by any
~usiness entity or trust in which the designated.employee or his
. or her spouse owns, directly, indirectly· or beneficially, a ten
percent (10%) interest or greater, provided, however, that in the
event that the income is received by a business entity described
in this paragraph (B), the valu~, for the purpose of paragraph (2),
of the income relates to the pro rata share of the designated
employee or his or her spouse in the income of the business entity
or trust.·
Income includes, except to the ~xtent excluded by
. this subsection, income of any nature from any source, including
but not limited to any salary, wage, advance, payment, dividend,
interest, rent, capital gain, return of capital, gift (including
any gift of food or beverage), loan, forgiveness or payment of
indebtedness, discount in the price of anything of value unless
the discount is available to mcmbeis of.the public without regard
to official status, rebate, reimbursement of expenses, per diem,
or con~ribution to an insurance or pension program pa~d by any
person other than an employer.
Income docs not include: (1) campaign contributions
required to be reported under Ch.1ptcr 4 (commencing with Section
84100) of Titl~ 9 of the Governmcnt·Codc; (2) salary nnd reimburse-
I..
ment for expenses or per diem received from a state or local govern-
ment agency and reimbursement for travel expenses and per d~em
received from a bona fide educational, academic or charitable
organization; (3) gifts of informational _material, such as books,.
pamphlets, reports, calendars or periodicals; (4) gifts which are
not used and which, within thirty days ~f~er receipt, are returned
to.the donor or delivered to a charita~le organization without
being claimed as a charitable contribution for tax purposes; .
(5) gifts from an individual's spous·e, ·child, parent, grandparent,
grandchild, brother, sister, .parent-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-
in-law, aunt, uncle, or first cousin or the spouse of any such
person; provided that a gift from any such person shall.be considered
income if the donor is acting as an agent or intermediary for any
person not covered by this paragrap~ (5); (6) any devise or inheri-
tance; (7) interest, dividends or premitmls on a time or demand
deposit in a financial in~titution, shares in a credit union or any
insurance policy, payments received under any insurance policy, or
any b·ond or other debt inst~ument issued by any government or
government agency; and (8) dividends, interest or any othe~ return
on a security which is registered with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of the United States Government.
(d) Category IV: Supply Sources. Category IV includes
investments includ~d. in Category.II in bu~iness entities described
therein, and income included in Catego~y III from business entities
described therein, if such business entities manufacture or sell
supplies, machinery or equipment of the type utilized by the
District.
(e) Category V: Contractors. Category V includes
investments included-in Category II in business entities described
therein, and income included in Category III from.business entities
described therein~ if such business entities arc contractors or
subcontractors cneaged in the performance of work or services of
-8-
the type utilized by the District.
(f) Category VI: Financial Institutions. Category
VI includes investments included in Category II in business entities
described therein, and income included in Category III from business
entities therein, if such business entities constitute banks, saving
and loan associations, insurance companies, investment companies,
title companies, financial consultants or data processing firms.
Section 2.6. Content of Disclosure Statements; Category I.
Disclosure statments required to be ~iled for reportaple interests
specifie~ in Category I shall contain the following information:
(a) The address or other precise location -of the
real property;
(b) A statement of the nature of the interest in
·the real property;
· (c) When the real property is not used principally
as the.residence of the designated employee making the filing, a
statement of whether the fair market value of .the interest exceeds
Ten.Thousand Dollars ($10,000) and whether it exceeds ·one Hundred
Thousand Dollars ($100, 000); and ...
(d) In the case of an interest in real property wholly
or partially acquired during the period covered by an annual disclo-
sure statement, the date of acquisition and, if such interest in
such property was disposed.of during such period, the date of dis-
position.
Section 2.7. Content of Disclosure Statements; Category II
.and Related Categories. Disclosure statements required to be filed
for reportable interests specified in Category II and investments
specified in Categories IV, V and VI shall contain the following
information:
(a) The name and address of the business entity in
which ench investment is held;
(b) A general description of the business activity
in which the business entity is engaged;
-9-
(c) A statement of the nature of the investment;
(d) A statement of whether the fair market value
of ·the investment ·exceeds Ten Thousand Dollars ($10, 000) and
whether it exceeds One Hundred Thousand D_ollars ($100,000); and
(e) In the case of investments wholly or partially
acquired during the period covered by an ~nnual disclosure state-
ment, t~e date of acquisition and, if such interest in such property
was disposed of during such period, the date of disposition.
Sectio~ 2.8. Content of Disclosure Statement; Category III
and Related Categories. Except as to an initial disclosure state-
ment for which income sources need not be reported,disclosure
statements required to be filed for reportable interests specified
in Category III and income sources specified in Categories IV, V
and VI shall contain the following ~nformation:
(a) The name and address of each source of income;
(b) A general .descripti~n of the business activity,
if any, of each source;
(c) A statement. whether the aggregate value of income
from each source was greater than One Thousand Dollars .($1,000),
and whether it was greater than Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000);
(d) A description of the ~onsideration, if any, for
l'lhich the income was received;
(e) In the case of income con~tituting a gift, the
amount and the date on which the gif~ ~as received;
(f) . In the case of income of a business entity, in
which the designated employee or his or her spouse owns a ten
percent·(10%) interest or more:
(1) name and address and a general description of
the business activity of the business e~tity;
(2) if such business entity provides legal or
brokerage service·s, the name of every natural person, non-profit
association or corporation·and business entity who paid.fees to
such business entity if the pro rata share of the designated
.. 10-
employee or his or her spouse of such fees was One Thousand Dollars
($1,000) or more; and
.
(3) if such busine~s entity does not provide
legal or brokerage services, the name of every natural person,
.non-profit association or corporation, and business .entity from
whom such business entity received payments if the pro rata share
of the designated employee or his or her spouse of gross receipts
from such person, non-profit association or corporation, or business
entity was Ten Thousand Dollars ($1~,000) or more during any calendar
year partially or wholly covered by the disclosure statement being
filed.
Section 2.9. Form of Disclosure Stat~ments. Disclosure
statements required to be filed hereunder for any category of
·reportable interests shall be substantially in the form set forth
for such category in Exhibit "B" attached hereto.·
·ARTICLE III--DISQUALIFICATION
Section 3.1. General Rule. Designated employees shall
disqualify themselves from making or participating in the making
of any governmental decision when it is reasonably foreseeable
that a financial interest of the designated employee may be
materially affected by the decision. A designated employee shall
not be required to disqualify himself with respect to any matter
which could not be lega1ly~acted upon or decided without his
participation.
Section 3.2. Making Governmental Decisions; Actions Included.
A designated employee makes a governmcnta~ decision within the
meaning of this Article, when he or she, acting within the authority
of his or her position:
(a) Votes on a matter;
(b) Appoints a person:
(c) Obligates or commits the District to any
course of action;
.. 11-
. (d) Enters into any contractual agreement on behalf
of the District; or
(e) Determines not to act, within the meaning of
subsection (a) through subsection (d), unless such determination
is made because of his or her financial interest~.
When the determination not to act occurs because of
his or her financial interest, the designated employee's determina-
tion must be accompanied by disclosure of the financial interest
. .
made part of the District's official records, or made in writing
!' to designated employee's supervisor or appointing power.
Section 3.3. Participating in Decisions; Actions Included.
A designated employee participates in the making .of a governmental
decision within the meaning of this Article, when he or she, acting
within the authority of his or her position:
(a) Negotiates in any manner with a governmental
e_ntity or private persc:l -:-egareing the decision;
(b) Conducts research or investigations regarding
the decision;
(c) Prepares any report, analysis, or opinion regarding
the decision;
(d) Participates in any governmentai discussions or
debates regarding the decision; or
(e) Advises or makes recommendations to the decision-
maker .
. Section 3.4. Making or Participating in Decisions; Actions
Excluded. Making or participating in the making of a governmental
decision as used in this Article shall not include:
(a) Actions of a designated employee which are solely
ministerial,· secretarial, manual, or cler~cal;
· (b) Appearances by a designated employee as a member
of the general public before an agency in the course of its pre-
scribed governmental function to represent hi.msclf or herself on
-12-
matters related solely to his or her personal interests; or
(c) Actions by a designated employee relating to
the compensation or the terms or conditions of his or her employ-
ment or contract.
Section 3.5. Financial Interest. A financial interest as
used in this Article means:
(a) A direct or indirect interest in real property
as described in Section 2.5(a) if such interest is worth more
than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000);
(b) A direct or indirect investment as described in
Section 2.S(b) if such investment is worth more than One Thous?nd
Dollars ($1,000);
(c) A source of income as described in Section 2.S(c),
other than a loan by a commercial lending institution in the
· regular course of business, if such income aggregates Two Hundred
Fifty Dollars ($250) or more in value_ received by or promised to
the designated employee within twelve (12) months prior to the
time when the decision referred to in Sec~ion 3.1 is made; or
(d) A business entity if the designated employee is
a director, officer, partner, trustee or employee or holds any
~osition of management therein.
For the purpose of this Section, indirect lnvestment
or interest means any investment or interest owned by the spouse
or dependent child of a designated employee, by an agent on behalf
of a designated employee, by any b~siness entity controlled by
the designated employee or by a trust in which he has a substantial
interest. ~ business entity is controlled by a designated employee
if the desi~nated employee, his agent, spouse and dependent children
hold more than fifty percent (50%) of the ownership interest in the
entity. A designate cl employee h.J.s·· a substantial. ·interest in a
trust when the employee, his spouse and dependent ~hildrcn have a
prPscnt or futurl! interest worth more th:m One Thousand· Doll:irs
($1, l100).
..1 · .....
Section 3.6. Affected Materially. (a) Standard of
Determination. The financial effect of a governmental decision
on-a financial interest of .a designated employee is material if,
at the time the designated employee makes or participates in the
making of a decision, in light of all the circurnstanc·es and facts
know"ll at the time of the dee is ion, the de_s igna ted employee knows or
ha$ reason to know that the existence of the financial .interest
might interfere with the designated employee's performance of his
or her duties. in an impartial manner.free from bias.
(b) Circumstances to be ·Considered. In determining
the existence of a rraterial effect upon a financial interest, the
designated employee shall consider relevant factors, in.c;luding but
not limited to the following:
(1) In the. case of any real property in which
the designated employee has a direct or indirect interest worth
more than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000): (A) whether the effect
of the decision will be to increase the income-producing potential
of the real property by One Hundred Dollars ($100) or a five percent ·
(5%) per month, whichever is less; and (B) wheth~r the effect of
the decision will be to inc~ease the fair market value of the real
~roperty by One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) or more or by five percent
(5%} whichever is greater.
(2) In the case. of a business entity in which the
designated employee has a direct or indirect investment worth more
than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000), or in the case of a designated
employee who is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee,
or holds any position of management in a business entity: (A) whether
the effect will be to increase or decrease the annualized gross
revenue of the business entity by one percent (1%) or more or the
annual net income of the business e~tity by five eercent (5%) or
more: and (B) whether the effect of the decision will be to increase
or decrease the assets or liabilities of the business e~tity by
·14-
...
Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) or more, or by five percent (5%)
of its current assets or liabilities, whichever is less.
(3) In the case of a source of income of a desig-
nated employee (other than a loan· ·by a commercial lending institu-
tion in the regular course of business) aegregating· Two Hundred
Fifty Dollars ($250) or more in value received by or promised to
the designated employee within twelve (12) months prior to the time
when the decision is made: (A) whether, if the source of income
...
is a business entity, the decision will affect such business entity
irr the manner deicribed in subsection ·(2) above; (B) ·whether the
governmental decision will directly affect the amount of income to·
be received by the designated employee: and -(C) whether there is
a nexus between the governmental decision .and the purpose for
which the designated employee receives income.
The specific dollar or percentage amounts set forth
. .
in this subsection do not constitute either absolute maximum or
minimum levels, but are merely intended to provide guidance and
should be considered along with other r·elevant factors in determining
whether a finar.cial interest may interfere with the designated
employee's exercise of his or her duties in rendering a decision ..
(c) Excluded Circumstances. The making or participation
in the making of a governmental decision by a person acting under
contract in the position of consultant or by a person retained
to provide information, advice, recommendation or counsel has no
material financial effect on a business entity or source of income
in which such person acting under contract in the position of
consultant, or per~on retained to provided information, advice,
recommendation or counsel is an officer, ·employee, sole proprietor
or partner, if the onlf financial effects of the decision are
the modification, perpetuation or ·renewal of the contract~al or
retainer agreement and/or the opportunity to bid competitively
on a project or contract.
-15-
Section 3.7. Notice of Action T;kcn. (a) Mandatory Posting
of Notice of Action Taken. If a designated employee· disqualifies
himself or herself from the making of a decision, or participation
in a decision, upon a particular subject, and if the District
subsequently cormnits itself to a definit~ course of action with
regard to said subject, then the Secretary shall post a Notice of
Action Taken as soon as is practicable following such connnitment.
Saiq Notice shall be substantially fn the form set forth in Exhi-
bit "C" attached hereto and by refer_ence incorporated herein and
shall be conspicuously posted on· or near the door of -the regular
meeting place of the governing body of the District.
(b) Discretionary Posting of Notice of Action .. In
the event that the District commits itself to a definite course of
action with regard to any subject and no disqualification has occurred,
the governing body may direct the District Secretary to post the
Notice described in subsection (a) at the time and place set forth
in said subsection ..
· (c) Request for Reconsideration: ·Time of Filing;
Effect of Failure to File. In the event that a Notice has been
posted pursuant to subsections (a) or (b), a written request for
reconsideration or disapproval of any District connnitment on the
ground of existence of a conflict of interest of a designated
employee shall be filed with the District Secretary within thirty
(30) days of the posting of said Notice. In the event that such a
request is not filed, said cormnitment and all decision made with
rega~d thereto shall be final and conclusive.
(d) Reconsideration Upon Filing of Request Therefor.
In the event that a request is filed with the District Secretary
pursuant to subsection (c) hereof, the Secretary shall direct said
request to the District governing body, officer or employee respon-
. .
sible for the District commitment in qu~stion and·said body, officer
or employee shall cause said commitment to be reconsidered .
.. 16-
EXII IB IT "A"
Designated Positions Categories
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Directors r , II, III
General Manager I, II, III
Director of Finance and I, II, III, IV, VI
Board Secretary
Chief Engineer I, II, III, v
Superintendent I, II, III, v
General Counsel I, II, III
Consultants I, II, III
Supervisory Personnel as set forth As determined by the General
in Districts' salary resolution,
as amended
Lead Storeskeeper As determined by the General
Engineering Department Personnel As determined by the General
associated with industrial waste
and/or construction activities
*The word "consultant" is defined in Section 1.S(b). A position
nominally known as a consultant to the District is not a
designated position herein unless such definition is satisfied.
Thus, a "financial consultant", an "engineering consultant" and
a "bond counsel" in many instances will not be a consultant
herein. Determinations hereunder shall be made by the govern-
ing body of the District.
Manager
Manager
Manager
EXHIBIT "B"
DISTRICT
----------~~-----------
DISCLOSURE STATE!·fENT
CATEGORY !--INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY
PLEASE NOTE: Before completing this statement, read Section 2.S(a)
of the Conflict of Interest Code of this District. Such Section
describes and limits the items required ~o be disclosed herein.
(Attach additional pages if needed.)
A. Designat~d position=--~-------~~~---~------~---------~---
B. Name of designated empl9yee:
--------~--~----------~~--------
c. Address or precise location of each parcel of real property:
D. Nature of interest in· each parcel of. real property (including
whether the interE:st is held by you, your spouse or a business
entity or trust in which you or your spouse own a ten percen~
interest or more): · ·
E. Ifthe real property does not ~onstitute your principal residence,
does the fair market value of such property exceed $10,000?
Parcel 1: Yes No -------
Parcel 2: Yes No
Parcel 3: Yes No ------
F.· If the real property does not constitute your principal residence,
docs the fair market value e>r s_uch property e~ceed $100, 000?
Parcel 1.: Yes No
Parcel 2: Yes No
Parcel 3: Yes No
-i-
:' ... FORM I
. '
DISTRICT
-------~--~~~~~--
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
CATEGORY !!--INVESTMENTS
PI.EASE NOTE: Before completing this statement·, read Section 2.S(b)
of the Conflict of Interest Code of this District. Such Section
describes and limits the items required to be disclosed herein.
(Attach additional pages if needed.)
B. Name of designated employee:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
C. Name· and address of the business entity in which each investment
is held.
D. General description of the business activity in which the business
entity is engaged.
E. Nature of each investment (including whether the investment is
held by you, your spouse, or a business entity or trust in which
you or your spouse own a ten percent interest or more):
F. Does the fair market value of the investment exceed $10,000?
Investment 1: Yes No
Investment 2: Yes No
Investment 3: Yes No
-1-
r"ORM II
G. If this disclosure statement is an annual, rather than an
initial, statement and if the interest in the real property was
wholly or partially acquired during the period covered by the
statc~cnt, give the date of acquisition of such interest and
the date of disposition, if any.
Parcel l: Acquisition
Disposition
Parcel 2: Acquisition
Disposition
Parcel 3: Acquisition
Disposition
STATE OF.CALIFORNIA )
) SS
County of ____ )
The undersigned,
·perjury, certifies as follows:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
under penalty of
. That (s)he has used all reasonable diligence in the preparation
of the foregoing Statement and that to the best of (his) (her)
knowledge it is true and complete.
19
.. ·
Signature:
~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Received by District on
~~~-~~-~ ' 19
-ii-
FORM I
G. Docs the fair market value of the investment exceed $100,000?
Investment 1:
Investment 2:
Investment 3·:
Yes
---Yes
Yes
No
---No
Ho
H. If this disclosure statement is an annual, rather than an
initial, statement and if the investment was wholly or partially
acquired during the period covered by the statement, give the
date of acquisition of such investment and the date of disposi-
tion, if any.
Investment 1: Acquisition Date:
Disposition Date:
Investment 2: Acquisition Date:
Disposition· Date:
Investment 3: Acquisition Date:
Disposition Date:
STATE OF CALIFOIUUA )
) SS
Co1:111tY of )
The undersigned, under penalty of
pe:.i:jury, certifies as !:ollows:
That (s)he has used all reasonable diligence in the preparation
of the foregoing Statement and that to the best of (his). (her)
knowledge it is true and complete.
19
Signature:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.,--~~~
Received by District on
By:
-T~i-t~l-e-:~~~-~~~--~~~~
-ii-
FORM II
DISTRICT
--~~~~--~~~---
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
CATEGORY III--INCOME
PLEASE NOTE: Before completing this statement, read Section 2.S(c)
of the Conilict of Interest Code of this District. Such Section
describes and limits the items required to be disclosed herein.
(Attach additional paees if needed.)
A. Designated position=~~--~~---------~------~~--------~~-
B. Name of designated empl~yee: __ ~--~----~----~--------~~~
C. Name and address of each source of income:
D. General ·description of the business.activity of each scurce of
income:
E.
F.
Source 3:
Was the aggregate
$1,000?
value of income from the source
Source 1: Yes No
Source 2: Yes· No
Source 3: Yes No
Was the aggregate value of income from the source
$10,000?
Source 1:
Source 2:
Source 3:
Yes
---Yes
Yes ---
No ---No
No ---
greater than
greater than
d. Describe the consideration, if any, for which the income was
received.
Source 1:
~------~~--~--------~--------~----------~-
-i-
FORM III
'.
H. Set forth the amount and the date of receipt of each gift.
Gift 1: • 19 : $ Gift 2 :----------, 19-; $---------
Gift 3: , 19= $ _______ _
Complete items I through L below where the income of a business
entity in which you or your spouse own a ten percent interest or
more, is being reported:
I. Name and address of each business entity.
Business Entity 1:
~~~~--~~~~~--~~~--~------~-
J. General description of the business activity of each business
entity. ·
K. If such business entity which provioes legal or brokerage .
··services, set forth the name of every natural person, non-profit
association or corporation and business entity who paid fees to
such business entity if you or your spouse's pro rata.share of
such fees was $1,000 or more.
Business Entity 1:
~--~~--~~~~~~~~~------~--~-
L. If such business entity docs not provide legal or brokerage
services, set forth the name of every natural person, non-profit
association or corporation, and business entity from who~ such
business entity rccc.ivcd p:iymcnts if you or your spouse's pro
rota share of ~ross receipts from such person, non-profit
association or corpor~tion, or business entity was .$10,000
.. 11-
FORM III
or more during any calendar year partially or wholly covered
by this statement.
Business Entity !: ______ ~~~~--~--~~~~~~--~---
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS
County of )
The undersigned, .,,.__-=--~~------~~~~~--~-' under penalty of
perjury, certifies as follows:
That (s)he has used all reasonable diligence in the preparation
of the foregoing Statement and that to the best of (his) (her)
knowledge it is true and complete.
. ,.·
·signature:
~~--~~--------~----~------~~
Received by District on
~~----~~--~--~
19
-iii-
FORM III
DISTRICT
--------~~----~~-
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
CATEGORY IV--SUPPLY SOURCES
PLEASE NOTE: Before completing this statement, read Section 2.S(d)
of the Conflict of Interest Code of this District. Such Section
describes and limits the items required to be disclosed herein.
(Attach additional pages if needed.)
•.
B. Name of designated employee:
~~---------~------------~---~~---------~
C. Name and addr~ss of the business entity in which each investment
is held:
Investment 2:
---~--------------------------------~------~--------~---~
Investment 3:
------~---------------------------~---------------------------~
D. General d.escription of the business activity in which the business
entity is engaged:
Inve s tmen.t 1 :
~~~---------------------------------------------------------~
E. Nature of each investment (including whether the investment is
held by you, your spouse, or a business entity or trust in which
you or your spouse own a ten percent interest or more):
F. Docs the fair market value of ·the. investment exceed $10, 000?
Investment 1: Yes
Investment 2: ·--Yes
Investment 3: ---Yes
-i-
FORM IV
No
---No
No ---
G. Does the fair market value of the investment exceed $100,000?
Investment 1:
Investment 2:
Inv es tn:lCn t 3:
Yes
---Yes
Yes ---
No
---No
No
H. If this disclosure stntement is an annual, rather than an initial,
statement and if the investment was wholly or partially acquired
during the period covered by the statement, r,ive the date of
acquisition of such investment and the date of disposition, if
any.
Investment 1: Date of Acquisition:
Date of Dispo_sition:
Investment 2: Date of Acq.uisition:
Date of Disposition:
Investment 3: Date of Acquisition:
Date of Disposition:
I. Name and address of each source of income:
Source 1:
J. General description of the business activity of each source of
income:
K. Was the aggregate value of income from the source greater than
$1,000?
Source l: Yes No
Source 2: Yes No
Source 3: Yes No
L. Was the aggregate value of income from the source greater than
$10,0007
Source 1: Yes No
Source 2: Yes No
Source 3: Yes No
-ii-
FORM IV
•.
M. Describe the consideration, if any, for which the income was
received:
Source 2:
~~~~~~~~~~~--~~~~----~~~~--~~
N. Set forth the amount and the date of receipt of each gift:
Gift 1: 19 ; $
Gift 2: , 19-; $-------
Gift .3:----------19=; $ ______ _
Complete items 0 through Q below where the income of a business
entity in which you or your spouse own a ten percent interest or
more:
0. Name and address of each business entity.
Business Entity 1:
~~~--~~----~------~~~--~~~~-
P. General description of the business activity of each business
entity.
Business Entity 1:
'Business Entity 2:
Q. Set forth the name of every natural person, non-profit associa-
tion or corporation, and business ~ntity from whom such business
entity received payments if you or your spouse's pro rata share
of gross receipts from such person, non-profit association or
corporation, or business entity was $10,000 or more during any
calendar yea~ partially or wholly covered by this state~ent:
Business Entity l:~~--~--~------~----~----~------~-
-iii-
FORM IV
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS
·county of )
• ..
. The undersigned, --,...-:--..--~~~~~~~~~~' under penalty of
perjury, certifies as follows:
That (s)he has used all reasonable diligence in the preparation
of the foregoing Statement and that to the best of (his) (her)
knowledge it is true and complete.
Signature:
~--~~~----~----~~--~----~~
Received by District on
~~----~~--~--~
19 .
.By: · .~T~i-t~l-e-=------------------------~
... iv-
FORM IV
DISTRICT ---------------------
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
CATEGORY V--CONTRACTORS
PLEASE NOTE: Before completing this statement, read Section 2.S(e)
of the Conflict of Interest Code of this District. Such Section
describes and limits the items required to be disclosed herein.
(Attach additional pages if needed.)
A. Designated position:
~--------------------------------------------•.
B. Name of designated employee:
----------------------------------~
C. Name and address of the business. entity in which each investment
is held:
Investment 2:
D. General description of the business activity in which the business
entity is engaged:
Investment 2: ----------------------------------------------
· Investment 3: ----------------------------------------------
E. Nature of each investment (i.ncluding whether the investment is
held by you, your spouse, or a business entity or trust in which
you or your spouse own a ten percent interest or more):
Inve.s tmen t 1 :
~----------------------------~-------------
Investment 2: -----------------------------------------------
Investment 3:
------------------------~----~-------------
F.. Does the fair market value of the investment exceed $tO, 0007
Invcstmer..t 1:
Investment 2:
Investment 3:
Yes
Yes
---Yes
-i-
FORM V
No
---No
No ---
G. Docs the fair market value of the investment exceed $100,000?
Investment 1:
Investment 2:
Investment 3:
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
---No
No
H. If this disclosure· statement is an annual, rather than an initial,
statement and if the investment was wholly or partially acquired
during the period covered by the statement, give the date of
acquisition of such investment and the date of di~position, if
any.
Investment 1: Date of Acouisition:
Date of Dispo~ition:
Investment 2: Date of Acquisition:
Date of Disposition:
Investment 3: Date of Acquisition:
Dat~ of Disposition:
I. Name and address of each source of income:
Source 1:
J~ General description of the business activity of each source of
income:
K. Was the aggregate value of income from the source greater than
$1,000?
Source 1: Yes No
Source 2: Yes No
Source 3: Yes No
L.· Was the aggregate
$10,000?
value of income from the source greater than
Source 1: Yes No
Source 2: Yes No
Source 3: Yes No
;.ii-
FORM v
M. Describe the consideration, if any, for which the income was
received:
Source 1:
---------~~----------~~~----~~~~--~--~~---
N. Set forth the amount and the date of receipt of each gift:
Gift 1: Gift 2 :------------19 $ 19-$-------
Gift 3:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
19-$
~~--~--~~~-
Complete items 0 through Q below where the ·income of a business
entity in which you or your spouse own a ten percent interest or
more:
o. Name and address of each business entity.
Business Entity 1:
Business Entity 2:
Business Entity 3:
P. General description of the business activity of each business
ez:itity.
Business Entity 1:
·Business Entity 2:
Business Entity 3:
Q. Set forth the name of every natural person, non-profit associa-
. tion or corporation, and business entity from whom such business
e~tity received payments if you or· your spouse's pro rata share
of gross receipts from such person, non-profit association or
corporation~ or business entity was $10=000 or more during any
calendar year partial~y or wholly covered by this statement:
Business Entity 1:
~~~~--~~~--~~--~--~~~----~-
Business Entity 2:
-iii-
FORM V
Business Entity 3=--------------------~--~~-----------
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS
County of )
The undersigned, -----=--=--~~--~~--~~~---' under penalty of
perjury, certifies as follows:
That (s)he has used all reasonable diligence in the preparation
of the foregoing State~ent and that to the best of (his) (her)
knowledge it is true and complete.
Dated: 19 .
Signature:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~----~~~-
Rec c iv e d by District on
~~~~~~--~~~
19 .
.. iv-
FORM V.1
DISTRICT
----~~~--~------
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
CATEGORY VI--FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
PLEASE NOTE: Before completing this statement, read Section 2.S(f)
of the Conflict of Interest Code of this District. Such Section
describes and limits the items required to be disclosed herein.
(Attach additional pages if needed.)
A. Designated position=-~--~~~----~~----------~~
B. Name of designated employee: ___ ~---------~--~~--
C. Name and address of the business entity in which each investment
is held:
D. General description of the business activity in which the business
entity is eugaged:
E. Nature of each investment (including whether the investment is
held by you, your spouse, or a business entity or trust in which
you or your spouse own a ten percent interest or more):
Inv es tn1en t 1:
~----~----~~---------~------
Investment 3 :-----------------------
F. Docs the fair market value of the investment exceed $10,000?
Investment 1:
Investment 2:
Invcst~1cnt 3:
Yes
---Yes
Yes ---
-i-
FORM VI
No
No
No
.~ i·
G. Docs the fair market value of the investment exceed $100,0007
Investment 1:
Invcstncnt 2:
Investment 3:
Yes
---Yes
Yes ---
No
No ---No
H. If this disclosure statement is an annual, rather than ~n initial,
statement and if the investment was wholly or partially acquired
during the period covered by the statement, give the date of
acquisition of such investment and. the date of disposition, if
any.
Investment 1: Date of Acquisition:
Date of Di~position:
Investment 2: Date of Acquisition:
Date of Disposition:
~-
Investme~t 3: Date of Acquisition:
Date of Disposition:
I. Name and address of each source o.f income:
Source 1:
J~ General description of the business activity of each source of
income:
K. Was the aggregate value of income-from the source greater than
$1,000?
Source 1: ·Yes No
Source 2: Yes No
Source 3: Yes No
L. l~as.the aggregate value of income from the source greater than
$10,000?
Source 1: Yes No
Source 2: Yes No
Source 3: Yes No
-ii-
FORM VI
M. Describe the considerat~on, if any, for which the income was
received:
N. Set forth the amount and the date of receipt of each gift:
Gift 1: 19 $ Gift 2:~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 19~; $~~~~~~~~-
Gift 3:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
19=; $ _____ _
Complete items· 0 through Q below where the income of a business
entity in which you or your spouse own a ten percent interest or
more:
0. Name and address of each business entity.
·nusiness Entity 1:
~~--~~~~~~~~~~~~~--~~~~
P •. General description of the business ·activity of each business
·~ntity.
Q.
Business Entity 1:
~~--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
,,· ..
Set forth the. name of every natural person, non.-profit associa-
tion or corporation, and business entity from whom such business
entity received payments if you or your spouse's pro rata share
of gross receipts from such person, non-profit association or
corporation, or business entity was $10,000 or more during any
calendar year partially or wholly covered by .this statement:
Business Entity 1:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-iii-
Business Entity 3=-------~-----------------------------
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS
.County of )
Th·e undersigned, __,..__,,,_ ___________ , under penalty of
perjury, certifie~ as follows:
·~ . That (s)he has used all reasonable.diligence in the preparation
of the foregoing Statement and that to the best of (his) (her)
~owledge it is true and complete.
Dated: ------------------19
Signature:
~----------------------
Received by District on
------~----~---
19 .
.By:
.cT~i~t~l-e-:-------------------------
,•"
-iv-
FORM VI
EXHIBIT "C"
NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the District has 'connnitted
itself to the following course of action:
----~--------------------
NOTICE IS.FURTHER GIVEN that in the event that any person
desires the District to reconsider, or disapprove of, said connnit-
ment on the ground o~ the existence of a conflict of interest of
a district officer, employee or consultant, a request for said
reconsideration or disapproval shall be submitted to the Secretary
of the District within thirty (30) days of the date hereof.
Dated:
-----------~--------------
...
By: __ ~---------~--~~--~~-District Secreta~y
..
RESOLUTION NO. __ _
A RESOLUTIO~ ADOPTING CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of
------~~~--~~~-
District, ------------~--~-----County,
C~ l if or n i a, as follows:
1. That that Code entitled "Conflict of Interest Code,
----~------~------~~--------~---
District", a copy of which
is attached hereto and by r~ference incorporated herein, be, and
is hereby, approved and adopted for the District, subject to the
approval thereof by· the Board of .supervisors of the Co'l;lnty of
·-·~· ··· · · ·. ; · 2. ·· That· the Secretary of this District be,. arid is hereby,
authorized and instructed to submit a copy of such Code to the
Board of Suvervisors of ~he County.of and to
request said Board of Supervisors to.approve said Code in accordance
with Government Code Section 87303.
. I
* * * . * , ....
(Certificate)
SUMMARY OF DISTRICT CONFLICT OF
. INTEREST CODE
The basic theory of the Code is that certain positions within
the District are deemed to involve the making or participation in
making of decisions which could foreseeably have a material effect
on a financial interest of the person holding a position. There-
fore persons holding such positions are required to file certain
disclosure statements disclosing certain interests and. in
addition. are required to disqualify themselves in certain instances
· from making specified decisions.
Article I. This Article contains general provisions includ-
ing definitions. This Article states that a "designated employee"
is that person which hold the position ("designated position")
'Within the District which requires th~ making of decisions encom-
passed by the Code.
""Designated positions" are those listed in column 1 of
f;xhi.bit "A". Such positions are. by the Code, deemed to involve
the making of decisions which could have a material effect on a
financial interest of the employee or officer making the decision.
"Reportable interests" are those interests which designated
employees must report on disclosure statements. and in essence.
constitute those interests of designated employees which could.be
affected by decision.
This Article also contains a narrow· definition of "consul-
tant". In particular a consultant, to be encompassed by the Code
must possess authority with respect to District decisions beyond
· the rendition of advice.
Article II. This Article contains the requirement for disclo-
·sure statements. It requires persons holding designated positions
to file an initial disclosure statement with the District Secretary
at the time specified in Section 2.3 and to file annual disclosure
statemenfs at the time specified in Section 2.4. The Secretary is
required to forward all of such statements to the Board of Super-
visors. ·
"Disclosure statements, however, need be filed only if the
person holding the designated position has "reportable interests".
If such person does not have reportable interests. then he need not
.file disclosure statements.
· ·Reportable interests are, by Section 2.5, divided into six
"categories" and Exhibit "A" assigns different categories to the
various designated positions.
The "categories" are generally summarized as follows:
Category I relates to interests with a value of more than
$1,000 in real property located within or close to the District.
It includes interests held by the designated cmployee.·his spouse
or by a business cnti ty owned by t~e employee or his spous.e.
. Category II relates to investments with a value of more
than $1,000 in business entities having real property in the District
or doing or pl3nning to do business in the District. It includes
investments held hy the designated employee, his spouse or by a
business entity owned by the employee or his spouse. . .
Category III relates to sources of income aggregating $250
or more or of gifts aggregating $25 or more if the source is
(generally) located within or doine business within the District.
It includes sources of income to the designated employee, his
spouse or a business entity and by the employee or his spouse.
Category IV relates to invest~ents in and income from busi-
ness entities which manufacture or sell supplies or equipment to
the District.
Category V relates to investment·s in and income from
contractors.
Category VI relates to investments in and income from
.financial institutions.
The Article describes the. information which is to be
given about each "category" and refers to forms attached to the
Code which are to be completed. For the most part, the informa-
tion required is general in nature.
Article III. This Article contains disqualification
requirements. It requires that persons holding the positions
designated in Exhibit "A" disqualify themselves from raaking or
participating in making a decision when it is reasonably fore~ee-
. able that his financial interest may be materially affected by the
decision. The terms "making a decision", "participating in the
making of a decision11
, "financial interest'1 and "materially affected"
are defined.
Generally, a "financial interest" is the same as an interest
which requires disclosure under Article II and whether an interest
will be ''materially affected" in a matter to be determined by the
person concerned, after he considers certain factors.-If he
decides that disqualification is necessary he must accompany the
disqualification by a disclosure of the financial interest made
a part of the District's records or made in writing to the person's
supervisor or appointing power.
This Article also establishes a procedure for reconsideration
of District action where a conflict of interest is alleged to
exist. It requires the District Secretary to post a Notice of
Action Taken whenever any designated employee has disqualified
himself from a decision and the District subsequently commits
itself to a definite course of action with regard to the subject
to which such decision pertains. It authorizes the District
Secretary to post such a Notice in other circumstances.
Whenever a Notice is posted pursuant to the Article, a
request for reconsideration of said District commitment must be
·made within thirty (30) days of the date.of posting of the Notice.
Enforcement. Government Code Section 87300 provides that
any violation ot a local Code is a violation of Chapter 7 of
Proposition (Title) 9. Chapter 11 of Proposition 9 provides the
following penalties for violation of the Law.
. .
. 1. Willful violation is misdemeanor and, in addition to
other misdemeanor penalties, the violator is liable for a fine
equal to the greater of $10,000 or three times the amount not
properly reported .
. ,
-2-
2. Violation is subject to discipline by the·District,
including dismissal.
3. Negligent violation subjects the violator to civil
action for an amount equal to the amount not properly reported
and for an amount up to three times of the amount of economic
benefit.
4. A judicial action to enjoin the violation may be brought
and if an official action is taken which ~he court determines might
not otherwise have been taken or approved, the court may set aside
the official action as void ..
. ....
-3-·
I
REFERENCE CHART
Section in Source of Section in Source of
Local Code Section* Local Code Section*
1.1 G 87300 First proviso G 82030
1.2 second sentence
1.3 Next to last
1.4 G 87303 paragraph G 82030(a)
.l. 5 (a) G'82005 first sentence
1. 5 (b) R .18 7 0 0 (a) ( 2) Last paragraph G 82030(b)
1. 5 (c) 2. 5 (d) G 87302(b)
1. 5 (d) second sentence
1. 5 (e) G 87302(a) 2.5(e) G 87302(b)
1. 5 (f) G 87302(b) second sentence
f ~ 5 (g)
fir.st sentence 2.5(f) G 87302(b)
second sentence
1. S(h) G 87302(b) 2·.6 . G 87302 (b)
third sentence fourth sentence
1. 5 (i) 2.6(a) G 87206(c) ·2.1 G 87302(b) 2.6(b) G 87206 (a)
first sentence 2.6(c) . G 87206(d)
2.2 R 18115 (a) 2.6(d) G 87206(£) ·2. 3(a) G 87302(b) 2.7 G 87302(b) I sixth sentence fourth sentence 2.3(b) G 87302(b) 2.7(a) G 87206 (b )"
seventh sentence 2. 7 (b)" G 87206 (b) I .. 2.3(c) c· 87302 (b) 2.7(c)· G 87206 (a)
eighth sentence ·2.7(d) G 87206 (d) • I 2.4 G 87302(b) 2.7(e) G 87206(f) i .... first $entence 2.8 ·G 87302(b) 2.5 G 87302(b) fifth sentence i second sentence 2.8(a) G 87207(a)(l) 2.5 (a) G 87302(b) 2.8(b) G 87207 (a) (1) I .. second sentence 2.B(c) G 87207(a)(2) J
I 2.5(a)(l) G 82035 2.8(d) G 87207(a)(3) I · 2.5(a) (2) G"82033 2.8(e) G 87207(a)(4)
first sentence 2. 8 (f)(l) G 87207 (b) (1) .2.5(~) (3) G 82033 2.8(f)(2) · G 87207 (b) (2) t
First proviso G 82033 2.8(f)(3) G 87207(b)(3) f ·Second proviso G 87206(e) 2. 9 . G 87206 and 87207 t 2.5(b) G 87J02(b) 3.1· G 87302(c)
second sentence 3.2 R 18700(b) 2.5(b) (1) G 82034 3.3 R 18700(c)
·first sentence 3.4 R 18700(d)
and G 82035 3.5 . G 87302(c) 2. 5 (b)(2) G 82034 second sentence second sentence and G 87103 2.5{b)(3) G 82034 ~3.6(a) R 18702(a) First proviso G 82034 3.6(b) R 18702(b) fourth sentence 3.6(c) R 18702(c) Second proviso G 87206(e) 3.7 Last paragraph G 82034
third sentence
-2.5(c) G 87302(b) -------~-----~---second sentence
.. 2 •. s(c) (1) G 87302(b) *.Ga Government Code third sentence R a:r Regulations of the Fair 2.S(c) (2) G 87207(a)(l) Political Practices Commission 2.5(c) (3) G 82030(a) in Division VI. Title 2 of the
· California Administrative Code
...
•.
WJML:
RESOLUTION NO. ---
A RESOLUTION SETTING TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING
ON PROPOSED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of ~-~~------
District, ---------~-----
·county, California, as
follows:
.WHEREAS, Government Code Section 87300 requires every local
government agency to adopt and promulgate a Conflict of Interest
Code;
WHEREAS, there has been presenteQ to this Board a proposed
Conflict of Interest Code for this District', a copy of which is on
file with the of the District; and -------
\WHEREAS, Governm~nt Code Section 87311 requires that the
r~view and p~eparation of Conflict of Interest Codes shall be
carried out under procedures which guarantee officers, employees,
members, and consultants of the District and to residents of the·
jurisdiction adequate notice and a fair opportunity to pres~nt
their views;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED:
1. That ~---~-~· the ~-day of ~---~~ 1976,
at the hour of ___ o'clock _.M .. , in t.he regular meeting place of
this Board, . ,
California, be~ and the same are hereby, appointed and fixed as the
time and place when and '~here this Board. will consider and determine
whether.the aforesaid. proposed Conflict of Interest Code shall be
adopted.
2 •. That the of this District be, and is --------
hereby, directed to give notice of said hearing by publication of
this resolution ~n full once.at least ten days prior to said hearing,
in the ~~~------~~~-'------~~· a newspaper of general
c~rculation in the District.
3. Thnt the ~~~~~~of this District be, and is hereby,
directed to distribute one copy of this resolution together with
one copy of the aforesaid Conflict of Interest Code to each person
or persons holding positions· within the District enumerated in
Exhibit "A" of said Code.
4. That the
~~~~~~~~
of this District.be, and is
hereby, ·directed to file copies of said Conflict of Interest Code
in the Di.strict office to be available for distribution to persons
requesting the same.
* * * * * ...
(Certificate)
. ,.·
.. 2-
11391 ACACIA PARKWAY, P. O. BOX 1437 • JEFFERSON 4-3943 e GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA 926-42
March 9, 1976
County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention: Fred Harper,
General Manager
Dear Fred:
The Sanitary District is in the process of forming a
Special Assessment District under the Street Improvement Act
of 1911 or 1913 for the purpose of financing the construction
of sewers to serve 21 homes constructed in Garden Grove on
Ranchero Way and Ranchero Place in 1952.
While reviewing the cost of this project, it was noted
that the County Sanitation District fees totaled $4620, which
represents over 46% of the estimated construction cost of
$10,000.
Because this is a low income neighborhood, the combina-
tion of construction costs, fees, and incidental expenses
would create an unusual financial hardship on the residents
which may ultimately lead them to abandon the project; there-
fore, after considering that these residents have been paying
taxes to the County Sanitation District for a ntunbe:r of years
without receiving any direct benefits, the Board of Directors
of the Garden Grove Sanitary District voted unanimously at
their last meeting to request the County Sanitation District
to waive the connection fee of $220.00 per unit.
In keeping with its policy to minimize the se1·;er c01mec-
tion expenses to the users whenever unusual costs are incurred
by them, the Sanitary District expects to waive its Sewer Service
Use Fee.
Your consideration in this matter '·rill be appreciated.
BP/bf
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
RO!Jl:RT H. MAii~. ·P1U'.'e!t~e-N'f: WALTER M. nm:ssEL, G~ert~rt¥: DH. SHf:LUON s. SINGER: NORMAN E. C.ULVER: HODERT PERRY
M E M 0 R A N D U M
April 29., 1976
TO: Fred A. Harper., General Manager
FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
SUBJECT: EIS/EIR for Facilities Plan Step 1 Grant
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71 ·0 5.C0·29 I 0
(71.C) 962·2.C 11
In March of 1975 the State along with the EPA offered a Step 1 Grant to
preparethe facilities plan and EIR for the future facilities contemplated
by the Sanitation Districts to meet the State and Federal requirements
for wastewater discharges to the ocean environment. It is a requirement
of the EPA to "author" an environmental impact statement whenever the
anticipated or estimated cost of facilities are in excess of $10 million.
The EPA has three choices for the preparation and finalization of an EIS
which are as follows:
1. Preparation of an EIS with their own staff.
2. Contract directly with the consulting firm for the preparation of
an EIS.
3. Authorize the grantee to contract for the EIS efforts under their
guidance.
Alternate No. 1 was not a feasible alternative inasmuch as the Re~ion IX
staff is inadequate to handle the efforts involved with the preparation of
the EIS and alternate No. 2 did not lend itself to the present procedures
of the EPA because of budget regulations in certain areas. Alternate No. 3
is the most popular alternative which has been utilized by Region IX to
cause the preparation and finalization of an EIS for major wastewater
treatment facilities. ·
In March 1975 the Boards of Directors approved a contract with J. B. Gilbert
and Associates to prepare an EIS in the amount of $60,000 based upon the
scope of work as outlined in the memorandum of understanding with EPA attached
to the Step 1 Facilities Planning Grant.
This memorandum set forth n time schedule and scope of the
work which indicated that the EIS should be completed in Fchruary of 1976.
Since then, EPA has been faced with subsequent regulations which
have expanded the scope of work included in the original memorandum
of understanding.
COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM No. 4
Fred A. Harper
April 29, 1976
Page Two
In recent discussions with the EPA, the State and t'he Districts' consultant
"J. B. Gilbert and Associates", it is estimated that the extended scope of
work will add an additional $90,000 to the efforts required by the Districts'
consultant hired on the direction of the EPA. Attached herewith is an
outline as submitted by J. B. Gilbert and Associates for the additional
work as required. It is now estimated that the public hearing on the EIS
will be held no later than December 15th of this year with a publishing of
the final EIS to be in February·of 1977.
It should be pointed out that no additional capacities or improved treatment
can be added until the EIS is completed. Also it has come to the Districts
attention that a simil~r EIS for the Los Angeles County Sanitation District
....
expended $250,000. In the original memorandum of understanding, the Districts'
consultant, J. B. Gilbert and Associates, was not charged with the responsibility of
printing of the final EIS document. It was originally contemplated that the
District would handle the printing of around 300 copies of this EIS. The EPA
has now requested that 1200 copies be printed in multiple colors which will
cost approximately $35,000. Therefore, I recommend.that the contract with
J. B. Gilbert and Associates be extended to include the additional scope of
work and outline their direction by the EPA in the amount not to exceed $90,000
for services plus an additional amount of $35,000 for the printing and
publication.
REL:ss
,·
·~·
... ---....
ATTACHMENT 1
SUMMARY OF ANTICIPATED COSTS
CSDOC EIR/EIS
After May 1, 1976
•.
·Development of supplemental information and data
requested by EPA for incorporation in the draft
including:
Marine biology
Air quality
Land use
Institutional framework and
mitigation measures
Miscellaneous supplemental work
Report preparation expenses
including drafting and
additional typing
Printing of Draft EIR/EIS
Contingency
$ 6,000
3,000
6,000
5,000
5,000
15,000
-35,000
10,000
$ 85,000
Additional work on development of reclamation
alternatives for incorporation into the
Facili~ies Plan and EIR/EIS:
Engineering
Environmental assessment
Total additional anticipated costs of
preparing Draft EIR/EIS
$ 10,000
5,000
$ 15,000
$100,000
Note: These costs do not include the preparation of
responses to the com.~ents on the Draft EIR/EIS nor
printing. Our experience has been that these costs
are a minimum of $25,000 equally divided between
reproduction of the Final EIS and professional time.
The exact level of effort required should be determined
by the District and EPA following the comment period.
PI; l 1 11 ii I l :. ~ .".: I :_ I 1 :--d I H 't · r i I 1 ~ ~ ( ~ < ll l S l ti I; l 1 I I~ J. } -~. ( ~ j } ; 'I ' I\ ' '
;
t
~------------------------------------------------------------=·RICHARD BUFFUM ;. .
. ! ~.-----------------------------The Sweet Flush of Success
a government study which had
Leen prepared years before, but
had been pigeon-holed in some
bureaucratic tiles.
':: The flush toilet, undoubtedly
·: one of ci\'ilization':> highest t achievements -as it combines in
· a single device the virturrs of
,:·. comfort, convenic~ce, sanitation e and a peaceful retreat for literary
!\ contemplation -has at last been II~ recognized for its only bad quality.
·.. It wastes water sh«mcfully.
I:· t: Now that will be changed by a
~bill signed by Gov. Brown which
:-limits new toilets installed after
~ · J 977 to using not more than 3112
·:gallons per flu~h. That, in case you
: haven't monitored it lately, is
~a bout one gallon less per flush
: .. than the current a\'crage.
:: · The magnitude of this reform
:: can be understood when you
• know that it will result in a state-
: wide saving in tot'al household
: ·water consumption of 40<;~,! In the
·~ case of Orange County alone, it
;'will not only prolong the useful
1 lin~s of our sewering facilities by
: 35 to 40 years, but it will conscrv·e
1 about 4.1 million gallons of water
per day.
Although the toilet bill was
. authorrd by Assemulyman 13arry
i\cenc (D-~urcka), we actually
have a Newport Beach man to
honor for bringing the attention of
the low Yolume flush toilet to the
state.
He is Lindsley Parsons. who a
dccacle ago recognized the ines-
timable merits of the low volume
toilet, and began a lonely cam-
paign for its universal recognition.
Several years ago, when Par-
sons was joint chairman of the
Orange County Sanitation
Districts, I had the pleasure of
inspecting Parsons' pilot model
.which was installed at the admin-
i5trative office of the Sanitation
Districts in Fountain Vallry. I was
jmpresscd and \vrote about it at
the time. ·
·But, in fairness to a visionary
pioneer, let's hear from Parsons
telling about this historic toilet in
his own words:
"The tremcndolls amount of
water consumed bv the common
toilet had always i1:ritatcd me, so I
brought the matter up before the
district boards and appealed to our
cngin(\crs to mnkc a study on
alternate method3.
"Some of the board members
brought me literature on heat
tr('atment and circubting pumps
utilizing suction methods. Finally,
one of our consultant-, discovered
, ; 2 Sun., Apr. 11, 1976 R
"This survey had all the infor-
mation on household water con-
servation we needed. and I per-
suaded the·management to in~tall
the facility with an att1chcd
water meter."
Needless to say, the experiment
was successful. A nw11bcr of
Orange County cities were per-
suaded to amend their building
codes to permit the less w~:~lt'·ful
facilities. In time, county sup(·n 1-
sors amended the county ordi-
nances.
With all due respect to Keene
for his legislation, I believe that a
grateful populace Bhould not lose
sight of the fact that Lindsley
Parsons is the actual father, as il
were, of the new law.
To this end, it is proper, I think,
that Parsons should be honored in
some way -not with a testi-
monial dinner and then forgotten
-that will perpetuate his name ·
among future generations. Per-
haps some great company, like
American Standard, would con-
sider naming their model appro-
pri.:itcly.
M E M 0 R A N D U M
April 29, 1976
TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager
FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
SUBJECT: EIS/EIR for Facilities Plan Step 1 Grant
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
In March of 1975 the State along with the EPA offered a Step 1 Grant to
preparethe facilities plan and EIR for the future facilities contemplated
by the Sanitation Districts to meet the State and Federal requirements
for wastewater discharges to the ocean environment. It is a requirement
of the EPA to "author" an environmental impact statement whenever the
anticipated or estimated cost of facilities are in excess of $10 million.
The EPA has three choices for the preparation and finalization of an EIS
which are as follows:
1. Preparation of an EIS with their own staff.
2. Contract directly with the consulting firm for the preparation of
an EIS.
3. Authorize the grantee to contract for the EIS efforts under their
guidance.
Alternate No. 1 is not a feasible alternative in as much as the Region IX
staff is inadequate to handle the efforts involved with the preparation of
the EIS and alternate No. 2 does not lend itself to the present procedures
of the EPA because of budget regulations in certain areas. Alternate No. 3
is the most popular alternative which has been utilized by Region IX to
cause the preparation and finalization of an EIS for major wastewater
treatment facilities.
In March 1975 the Boards of Directors approved a contract with J. B. Gilbert
and Associates to prepare an EIS in the amount of $60,000 based upon the
scope of work as outlined in the memorandum of understanding as attached
to the State Step 1 Grant.
This memorandum of understanding set forth a time schedule and scope of
work which indicated that the EIS should be completed in February of 1976.
Since that time, the EPA has been faced with subsequent regulations which
have expanded the scope of work which was included in the original memorandum
of understanding.
COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM No. 4
Fred A. Harper
April 29, 1976
Page Two
In recent discussions with the EPA, the State and the Districts' consultant
"J. B. Gilbert and Associates", it is estimated-that the extended scope of
work will add an additional $90,000 to the efforts required by the Districts'
consultant hired on the direction of the EPA. Attached herewith is an
outline as submitted by J. B. Gilbert and Associates for the additional
work as required. It is now estimated that the public hearing on the EIS
will be held no later than December 15th of this year with a publishing of
the final EIS to be in February·of 1977.
It should be pointed out that no additional capacities or improved treatment
can be added until the EIS is completed. Also it has come to the Districts
attention that a similar EIS for the Los Angeles County Sanitation District
,.. .-· ---
expended $250,000. In the original memorandum of understanding, the Districts'
consultant, J. B. Gilbert and Associates, was not charged with the responsibility of
printing of the final EIS document. It was originally contemplated that the
District would handle the printing of around 300 copies of this EIS. The EPA
has now requested that 1200 copies be printed in multiple colors which will
cost approximately $35,000. Therefore, I recommend that the contract with
J. B. Gilbert and Associates be extended to include the additional scope of
work and outline their direction by the EPA in the amount not to exceed $90,000
for services plus an additional amount of $35,000 for .the printing and
publication.
REL:ss
-' .
ATTACHMENT 1
SUMMARY OF ANTICIPATED COSTS
CSDOC EIR/EIS
After May 1, 1976
Development of supplemental information and data
requested by EPA for incorporation in the draft
including:
Marine biology
Air quality
Land use
Institutional framework and
mitigation measures
Miscellaneous supplemental work
Report preparation expenses
including drafting and
additional typing
Printing of Draft EIR/EIS
Contingency
$ 6,000
3,000
6,000
5,000
5,000
15,000
35,000
10,000
$ 85,000
Additional work on development of reclamation
alternatives for incorporation into the
Facilities Plan and EIR/EIS:
Engineering
Environmental assessment
Total additional anticipated costs of
preparing Draft EIR/EIS
$ 10,000
5,000
$ 15,000
$100,000
Note: These costs do not include the preparation of
responses to the comments on the Draft EIR/EIS nor
printing. Our experience has been that these costs
are a minimum of $25,000 equally divided between
reproduction of the Final EIS and professional time.
The exact level of effort required should be determined
by the District and EPA following the comment period.
11391 ACACIA PARKWAY, P. 0. BOX 1437 e JEFFERSON 4-3943 e GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA 926"2
March 9, 1976
County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention: Fred Harper,
General Manager
Dear Fred:
The Sanitary District is in the process of forming a
Special Assessment Di~trict under the Street Improvement Act
of 1 911 or 1 913 for the purpose of financing the construction
of sewers to serve 21 homes constructed in Garden Grove on
Ranchero Way and Ranchero Place in 1 952 .
While r eviewing the cost of this project, it was noted
that the County Sanitation District fees tot aled $4620, which
represents over 46% of the estimated construction cost of
$10,000.
Because this is a low income neighborhood, the combina-
tion of construction costs, fe e s, and inc ident al expenses
would create an unusual financial hardship on the re s idents
which may ultimately l e ad them to abandon the project; there -
fore, after considering that these reside nts have been paying
taxes to the County Sanitation District for a number of years
wi thout receiving any direct benefits, t h e Board of Directors
of the Garden Grove Sanitary District voted unanimously at
their last meeting to request the County Sanitation District
t o waive the connec t ion fee of $220 .00 per unit.
In keeping with its policy to minimize the s e we r connec -
tion expenses to the users whenever unusual c o sts a r e incurre d
by the m, the Sanitary District e xpects to waive i t s Se we r Ser v ice
Use Fee .
Your consideration in this ma t ter will be appreciated.
Very ,;tru7y y~u ,
f/f ;-----/ /IA L--~etry ' r e'-c(;orr
BP/bf
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ROB ERT H . MAIN, PIU!81Dl!ln"; WALTER M. BRESSEL, ~HAB'l',.,AY : DR. SHELOON S. S INGER; NORMAN E . CULVER : ROBERT PERRY
n. ... WJML:SSW:ra 1/21/76
Rev. 2/2/76
CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
OF THE
ARTICLE !--GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 1.1. Authority. This Code is adopted pursuant to,
'
-and in implementation of, Article 3 (conunencing with Section 87300)
of Chapter 7,. Title 9 of the Government Code of the State of
California.
Section 1.2. Effect. This Code is in addition to State
and local laws pertaining to conflicts ·of interest of District
officers and employees and is not intended to abridge or otherwise
modify such laws.
Section 1.3. Severability. If any article, section, subsec-
tion, paragraph, subparagraph, sentence,_ clause or phrase of this
Code is for any reason held to be invalid, unconstitutional or
Unenforceable, such decision shall not a~fect the validity of the
r~maining portions of this Code. The District declares that it
would have adopted this Code and each article, section, subsection,
·paragraph, subparagraph, sentence, clause and phrase thereof
irrespective of the fact any one or more of such portions of this
Code be declared invalid, unconstitutional or unenforceable.
Section 1.4. Effective Date.· ·This Code shall take effect
upon its approval by the Board of Supervisors of the County.
Section 1.5. Definitions. As used in this Code, unless
the context otherwise clearly implies, the following words and
terms shall have the meanings set forth herein.
(a) Business entity. "Business entity" means any
organization or enterprise operat~d for .profit, _including but not
limited to a proprietorship, partnership, firm, business trust,
joint venture, syndicate, 'corporation or association.
(b) Consultant. "Consultant" means a p~sition established
by contract with the District pursuant to which contract information,
advice, recommendation or counsel is provided to the District;
provided, however, that "consultant" shall not include a position
in which the person providing such information, advice, recommend-
ation or counsel:
(1) conducts research· and arrives at conclu-
sions with respect to his or her rendition of information,
. .
advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control
and direction of the District or of any District official,
other than normal contract monitoring; and
(2) possesses no authority with respect to
any Dis.trict decision beyond the rendition of information,
advice, reconnnendation or counsel. ·
(c) County. "County'~ means the county in whiGh this
District is located.
(d) . Designated employee. "Designated employee" means
a natural person holding, or representing a business entity which
h~lds, a designated position. . ,.;·
(e) Designated position. "Designated position" means
a position within the District specified in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto. Designated positions are deemed to involve the making or
participation in the making of decisions which may foreseeably have
a material effect on a financial interest of the designated employee
holding such position.
(f) Disclosure statements. "Disclosure statements"
mean st~tements disclosing reportable interests required, by
Section 2 .1, to be filed by designated employees.
·(g) District. "District" means this District.
(h) Reportable interests. "Reportab~e interests"
mean investments, interests in real property and income required
to be disclosed by designated employees. "Reportable interests"
-2-
as to any particular designated employee means those. categories_
of such interests assigned, by Exhibit "A" attached hereto, to the
designated position held by such employee. "Reportable interests' as
to any particular employee are deemed by said assignment to be
affected foreseeably and materially by any decision made or parti-
cipated in by the designated employee by virtue of his or her
position.
(i) Secretary. "Secretary" means that officer of . . .. .
this District responsible for Di~tri~t files and records.
ARTICLE !!--DISCLOSURE
Section 2.1. Disclosure Statements. Each designated·
employee .shall file an initial statement and annual statements
disclosing those reportable interests in the category or categories
of reporta~le interests, more particularly described in Section 2.5,
which are assigned by Exhibit "A" hereof to the designated position
-held by such c~ployee. In the event a designated employee does not
have any such reportable interests, such statements n~ed not be
filed. Such statements shall be filed at the place specifi~d in
Section 2.2 and at the times specified. in Section 2.3 and Section
2.4, shall contain the information specified in Section 2 .. 6 through
Section 2.8, and shall be in the form specified in Section 2.9.
Section 2.2. Place of Filing. Disclosure statements
shall be filed, ~n the original, with the.Secretar~, who shall
receive such statements on behalf of the District. The Secretary
shall make and retain a copy of each disclosure· statement so
filed and shall forward the original thereof to tbe Board of
Supervisors of the County.
Section 2.3. Time of Filing Initial Statements. (a) In
General. Each designated employee havin~ reportable interests shall
file an initial disclosure statement within thirty· (30) days after
the effective date of this Code.
-3-
(b) Civil Service Employees. Each civil service
employee who assumes a designated position· more than thirty (30)
days after the effective date of the Cod~ and who has reportable
interests at the time of assuming ·such position shall file an
initial disclosure statement within thirty (30) days after assuming
such position.
(c) Other Employees. Each employee who is not a
civil service employee, who assumes a'designated position more ..
. ~ban thirty (30) days after the effective date of this Code, and
./· -who has reportable interests at the time of assuming such position
.shall file an initial disclosure statement not less than ten (10)
·days before assuming such position, unless an earlier assumption
.of such position is required, in which event, the initial disclosure
.statement shall be filed within 30 days of assuming the designated
position.
Section 2.4. Time of Filing Annual· Statements. An annual
~disclosure statement shall be filed in the month of February of
each year by each designated employee who acquired. received or held a
reportable interest during the preceding calendar.year whether or
. not such reportable interest was disposed of during such calendar
year and whether or not the designated employee ·filed an initial
·:.Statement pursuant to Section 2.3.
Section 2.5. Categories of Reportable Interests. Reportable
·interests are divided into the following categories:
(a) Category I: Interests in Real Property. Interests
in real property are reportable interests if:
(1) the real property to.which the interest
~pertains is located in part or in whole,(A) within the boundaries
of the District, (B) within two miles of the boundaries of the
District, -or (C) within two miles ~f land located outside-of the
boundaries of the District which is owned or· used by the District;
(2) the fair market value of the interest of the
·designated employee or his or her spbuse is greater than One Thdusand
-4-
·~
Dollars ($1,000); and
(3) the interest is either: (A) a leasehold,
beneficial or ownership interest held by the designated employee
or his or her spouse, (B) an option held. by the designated employee
or his or her spouse to acquire such an interest,· or (C) an interest
or option held by a business entity or ~rust in which the designated
. employee or his or her spouse owns directly, i.ndirectly or benefi-
cially, a ten ·percent (10%) interes~ or greater;·provided, however,
that~in the event that the ownership interest of the designated
employee or his or her spouse in such business entity or trust is
less than fifty percent (50%), the value, for the purpose of para-
graph (2), of the real property interest or option relates to the
value of the pro rata share of the designated employee or his or
her spouse in the real property interest or option held by the
business ·entity or trust; and provided further, that in the event
that the ownership iriterest of the designated employee or his or
her spouse in such business entity or trust is fifty percent (50%)
or more, the value, for the purpose of paragraph (2), of the real
property interest or option relates to the entire value of the real
property interest or option held by the business entity or trust.
(b) Category II: Investments. Investments in business
entities are reportable if:
(1) the business entity, including parent corpora-
tions, subsidiary corporations or otherwise related business
entities, (A) has an interest in real property located in part or
in whole within the boundaries of the District, within two miles
thereof or within two miles of land. owned or used by the District,
(~) does business or plans to do business within the District, or
(C) has done business within the District at any time.during the
~wo years.prior to the time that the disclosure statement-of the
designated employee is filed;
(2) the fair market value of the investment of
-5-
. -------
the designated employee or his or her spouse is greater than One
Thousand Dollars ($1,000); and
(3) ~he investment either (A) is held by the desig-
nated employee or his or her spouse and constitutes a financial
interest in, or security issued by, the business en~ity, including
but not limited to common stock, preferr~d s·tock, rights, warrants,
options, debt instruments and any partnership or other ownership
interest; or (B) is held by any _business entity or trust in which the
designated employee or his or her spouse owns, directly, indirectly
or beneficially,· a ten percent (10%) interest or greater, and con-
stitutes a financial interest in, or security· issued by, a business
entity qualifying under paragraph (2) above, provided, however,
that in the event that the ownership interest of the designated
employee or his or her spouse in su~h business entity or trust is
less than fifty percent (50%), the value, for the purpose of·
paragraph (2)_, of the investment relates to the value of the pro
rata share of the designated employee or his or her spouse in the
investment held by the busi~ess entity or trust; and provided
further, that in the event that the ownership intere.st of ~he desig-
nated employee or his or her spouse in such business entity or
trust is fifty percent (50%) or more,· the value, for the purpose of
paragraph (2), of the investment relates to the entire value of the
investment held by_the business entity or_ trust.
An investment is not -~eportable if it constitutes
a time or demand deposit in a financial institution, a share in a
credit union, an insurance policy, or a bond or other debt instru-
ment issued by any government or government agency.
(c) Category III: Sources of Income. Sources of income
are reportable if:
(1) the source of income was eit~er (A) a business
entity located o~ doing business as described in subsection (b) {l)
(B) an individual residing.within the District, or (C) a non-profit
-6-
association or corporation having its principal place of business
within the District;
(2) either (A) the aggregate amount of income
received by the designated employe.e or his or her _spouse from the
source during the period covered by the disclosure· statement was
Two Hundred Fifty Dollars·· ($250) or more in value, or (B) if the
. income was a gift received by the· designated employee or his or her
spouse from the source during the pe!iod covered·by the disclosure
statment, the value of the gift was Twenty-Five Dollars ($25) or
mo.re; and
(3) the income was either received by (A) the
designated employee or his or her spouse, o~ (B) received by any
business entity or trust in which_ the desisnated.employee or his
or her spouse owns, directly, indirectly or beneficially, a ten
percent (10%) interest or greater, provided, however, that in the
event that the income is received by a business entity described
in this paragraph (B), the value, for the purpose of paragraph (2),
of the income relates to the pro rata share of the designated
employee or his or her spouse in the income of the business entity
or trust.·
Income includes, except to the ~xtent excluded by
. this subsection, income of any nature from any source, including
but not limited to any salary, wage, advance, payment, dividend,
interest, rent, capital gain, return of capital, gift (including
any gift of food or beverage), loan, forgiveness or payment of
indebtedness, discount in the price of anything of value unless
the discount is available to members of.the public without regard
to official status, rebate, reimbursemen~ of expenses, per diem,
or con~ribution to an insurance or pension program pa~d by any
person other than an employer.
Income does not include: (1) campaign contributions ~
required to be reported under Chapter 4 (commencing with Section
84100) of Titl~ 9 of the Government·Code; (2) salary and reimburse-
-7-
ment for expenses or per diem received from a state or local govern-
ment agency and reimbursement for travel expenses and per diem
received from a bona fide educational, academic or charitable
organization; (3) gifts of informational _material, such as books,.
pamphlets, reports, calendars or periodicals; (4) gifts which are
not used and which, within thirty days ~f~er receipt, are returned
to.the donor or delivered to a charitabie organization without
being claimed as a charitable. contribution for tax purposes; .
(5) gifts from an individual's -spouse, ·child, parent, grandparent,
grandchild, brother, sister, .parent-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-
in-law, aunt, uncle, or first cousin or the spouse of any such
person; provided that a gift from any such person shall.be considered
income if the donor is acting as an agent or intermediary for any
person not covered by this paragraph (5); (6) any devise or inheri-
tance; (7) interest, dividends or premitnns on a time or demand
deposit in a financial in$titution, shares in a credit union or any
insurance policy, payments received under any insurance policy, or
any b"ond or other debt inst~ument issued by any government or
government agency; and (8) dividends, interest or any othe~ return
on a security which is registered with the Securities and Exchange
Gonunission of the United States Government.
(d) Category IV: Supply Sources. Category IV includes
investments included. in Category.II in bu~iness entities described
therein, and income included in Categ.o~y III from business entities
described therein, if such business entities manufacture or sell
supplies, machinery or equipment of the type utilized by the
District.
(e) Category V: Contractors. Category V includes
investments included.in Category II in busi.ness entities described
therein, and income included in Category III from.business entities
described therein; if such business entities are contractors or
subcontractors engaged in ~he performance of work or services of
-8-
the type utilized by the District.
(f) Category VI: Financial Institutions. Category
VI includes investments included in Category II in business entities
described therein, and income included in Category III from business
entities therein, if such business entities constitute banks, saving
and loan associations, insurance companies, investment companies,
title companies, financial consultants or data processing firms.
Section 2.6. Content of Pisclosure Statements; Category I.
Disclosure statments required to be ~iled for reporta?le interests
specifie~ in Category I shall contain the following information:
(a) The address or other precise location -of the
real property;
(b) A statement of the nature of the interest in
'the real property;
· (c) When the real property is not used principally
as the.residence of the designated employee making the filing, a
statement of whether the fair market value of .the interest exceeds
Ten.Thousand Dollars ($10,000) and whether it exceeds ·0ne Hundred
Thousand Dollars ($100, 000); and ...
(d) In the case of an interest in real property wholly
or partially acquired during the period covered by an annual disclo-
sure statement, the date of acquisition and, if such interest in
such property was disposed.of during such period, the date of dis-
position.
Section 2.7. Content of Disclosure Statements; Category II
.and Related Categories. Disclosure statements required to be filed
for reportable interests specified in Category II and investments
specified in Categories IV, V and VI shall contain the following
information:
(a) The name and address of the business entity in
which each investment is held;
(b) A general description of the business activity
in which the business entity is engaged;
-9-
(c) A statement of the nature of the investment;
(d) A statement of whether the fair market value
of ·the investment ·exceeds Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) and
whether it exceeds One Hundred Thousand pollars ($100,000); and
(e) In the case of investments wholly or partially
acquired during the period covered by an annual disclosure state-
ment, t~e date of acquisition and, if ~uch interest in such property
was disposed of during such period, the date of disposition.
Sectio~ 2.8. Content of Disclosure Statement; Category III
and Related Categories. Except as to an initial disclosure state-
ment for which income sources need not be reported,disclosure
statements required to be filed for reportable interests specified
in Category III and income sources specified in Categories IV, V
and VI shall contain the following tnformation:
(a) The name and address of each source of income;
(b) A general .description of the business activity,
if any, of each source;
(c) A statement. whether the aggregate value of income
from each source was greater than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000),
and whether it was greater than Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000);
(d) A description of the consideration, if any, for
which the income was received;
(e) In.the case of income con~tituting a gift, the
amount and the date on which the gift ~as received;
(f) . In the case of income of a business entity, in
which the designated employee or his or her spouse owns a ten
percent·(l0%) interest or more:
(1) name and address and a general description of
the business activity of the business e!ltity;
(2) if such business entity provides legal or
brokerage service·s, the name of every natural person, non-profit
association or corporation· and business entity who paid.fees to
such business entity if the pro rata share of the designated
-10-
employee or his or her spouse of such fees was One Thousand Dollars
($1,000) or more; and
(3) if such business entity does not p~ovide
legal or brokerage services, the name of every natural person,
.non-profit association or corporation, and business .entity from
whom such business entity received payments if the pro rata share
of the designated employee or his or her spouse of gross receipts
from such person, non-profit association or corporation, or business
entity was Ten Thousand Dollars ($10·, 000)' or more during any calendar
year partially or wholly covered by the disclosure statement being
filed.
Section 2.9. Form of Disclosure Statements. Disclosure
statements required to be filed hereunder for any category of
·reportable interests shall be substantially in the form set forth
for such category in Exhibit "B" attached hereto ..
ARTICLE III--DISQUALIFICAT!ON
Section 3.1. General Rule. Designated employees shall
disqualify themselves from making or participating in the making
of any governmental decision when it is reasonably foreseeable
that a financial interest of the designated employee may be
materially affected by the decision. A designated employee shall
not be required to disqualify himself with respect to any matter
which could not be legally.acted upon or _decided without his
participation.
Section 3.2. Making Governmental Decisions; Actions Included.
A designated employee makes a governmental decision within the
meaning of this Article, when he or she, acting within the authority
of his or her position:
(a) Votes on a matter;
(b) Appoints a person;
(c) Obligates or commits the District to any
course of action;
-11-
. (d) Enters into any contractual agreement on behalf
of the District; or
(e) Determines not to act, within the meaning of
subsection (a) through subsection (d), unless such determination
is made because of his or her financial interest_.
When the determination not to act occurs because of
his or her financial interest, the designated employee's determina-
tion must be accompanied by disclosure of the financial interest
made part of the District's official records, or made in writing
to designated employee's supervisor or appointing power.
Section 3.3. Participating in Decisions; Actions Included.
A designated employee participates in the making .of a governmental
decision within the meaning of this Article, when he or she, acting
within the authority of his or her position:
(a) Negotiates in any manner with a governmental
entity or.private perscn regarding the decision;
(b) Conducts research or investigations regarding
the decision;
(c) Prepares any report, analysis, or opinion regarding
the decision;
(d) Participates in any governmentai discussions or
debates regarding the decision; or
(e) Advises or makes recotmnendations to the decision-
maker.
Section 3.4. Making or Participating in Decisions; Actions
Excluded. Making or participating in the making of a governmental
decision as used in this Article shall not include:
(a) Actions of a designated employee which are solely
ministerial, secretarial, manual, or cler~cal;
· (b) Appearances by a designated employee as a member
of the general public before an agency in the course of its pre-
scribed governmental function to represe~t himself or herself on
-12-
matters related solely to his or her personal interests; or
(c) Actions by a designated employee relating to
the compensation or the terms or conditions of his or her employ-
ment or contract.
Section 3.5. Financial Interest. A financial interest as
used in this Article means:
(a) A direct or indirect interest in real property
as described in Section 2.5(a) if such interest is worth more
...
than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000);
(b) A direct or indirect investment as described in
Section 2.5(b) if such investment is worth more than One Thous?nd
Dollars ($1,000);
(c) A source of income as described in Section 2.5(c),
other than a loan by a commercial lending institution in the
· regular course of business, if such income aggregates Two Hundred
Fifty Dollars ($250) or more in value received by or promised to
the designated employee within twelve (12) months prior to the
time when the decision referred to in Sec~ion 3.1 is made; or
(d) A business entity if the designated employee is
a director, officer, partner, trustee or employee or holds any
position of management therein.
For the purpose of this Section, indirect investment
or interest means any investment or interest owned by the spouse
or dependent child of a designated employee, by an agent on behalf
of a designated employee, by any husiness entity controlled by
the designated employee or by a trust in which he has a substantial
interest. A business entity is controlled by a designated employee
if the designated employee, his agent, spouse and dependent children
. .
hold more than fifty percent (50%) of the ownership interest in the
entity. A designated employee has·· a substantial. 'interest in a
trust when the employee, his spouse and dependent -children have a
prPsent or future interest worth more than One Thousand· Dollars
( $1 . l100) .
.1 ·.-...
Section 3.6. Affected Materially. (a) Standard of
Determination. The financial effect of a governmental decision
on-a financial interest of .a designated employee is material if,
at the time the designated employee makes or participates in the
making of a decision, in light of all the circumstances and facts
known at the time of the decision, the d~signated employee knows or
ha~ reason to know that the existence ?f the financial .interest
might interfere with the designated employee's performance of his
or her duties. in an impartial manner.free from bias.
(b) Circumstances to be Considered. In determining
the existence of a material effect upon a financial interest, the
designated employee shall consider relevant factors, in~luding but
not limited to the following:
(1) In the. case of any real property in which
the designated employee has a direct or indirect interest worth
more than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000): (A) whether the effect
of the decision will be to increase the income-producing potential
of the real property by One Hundred Dollars ($100) or a five percent ·
(5%) per month, whichever is less; and (B) whether the effect of
the decision will be to increase the fair market value of the real
property by One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) or more or by five percent
(5%). whichever is greater.
(2) In the case. of a business entity in which the
designated employee has a direct or indirect investment worth' more
than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000), or in the case of a designated
employee who is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee,
or holds any position of management ina business entity: (A) whether
the effect will be to increase or decrease the annualized gross
revenue of the business entity by one percent (1%) or more or the
annual net income of the business e~tity by five ~ercent (5%) or
more; and (B) whether the effect of the decision will be to increase
or decrease the assets or liabilities of the business e~tity by
-14-
Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) or more, or by five percent (5%)
of its current assets or liabilities, whichever is less.
(3) In the case of a source of income of a desig-
nated employee (other than a loan·by a conrrnercial lending institu-
tion in the regular course of business) aggregating· Two Hundred
Fifty Dollars ($250) or more in value received by or promised to
the designated employee within twelve (12) months prior to the time
when the decision is made: (A) whether, if the source of income
is a business entity, the decision will affect such business entity
irr the manner des.cribed in subsection '(2) above; (B) ·whether the
governmental decision will directly affect the amount of income to
be received by the designated employee; and -(C) whether there is
a nexus between the governmental decision and the purpose for
which the designated employee receives income.
The specific dollar or percentage amounts set forth
. .
in this subsection do not constitute either absolute maximum or
minimum levels, but are merely intended to provide guidance and
should be considered along with other relevant factors in determining
whether a financial interest may interfere with the designated
employee's exercise of his or her duties in rendering a decision.
(c) Excluded Circumstances. The making or participation
in the making of a governmental decision by a person acting under
contract in the position of consultant or by a person retained
to provide information, advice, recormnendation or counsel has no
material financial effect on a business entity or source of income
in which such person acting under contract in the position of
consultant, or person retained to provide~ information, advice,
recommendation or counsel is an officer, ·employee, sole proprietor
or partner, if the only financial effects of the decision are
the modification, perpetuation or ·renewal of the contractual or
retainer agreement and/or the opportunity to bid competitively
on a project or contract.
-15-
Section 3.7. Notice of Action T£ken. (a) Mandatory Posting
of Notice of Action Taken. If a designated employee· disqualifies
himself or herself from the making of a decision, or participation
in a decision, upon a particular subject, and if the District
subsequently commits itself to a definit~ course of action with
regard to said subject, then the Secretary shall post a Notice of
Action Taken as soon as is practicable following such commitment.
Said Notice shall be substantially fn the form set forth in Exhi-
bit "C" attached hereto and by refer.ence . incorporated herein and
shall be conspicuously posted on· or near the door of -the regular
meeting place of the governing body of the District.
(b) Discretionary Posting of Notice of Action .. In
the event that the District commits itself to a definite course of
action with regard to any subject and no disqualification has occurred,
the governing body may direct the District Secretary to post the
Notice described in subsection (a) at the time and place set forth
in said subsection.
· (c) Request for Reconsideration: · Time of Filing;
Effect of Failure to File. In the event that a Notice has been
posted pursuant to subsections (a) or (b), a written request for
reconsideration or disapproval of any District commitment on the
ground of existence of a conflict of interest of a designated
employee shall be filed with the District Secretary within thirty
(30) days of the posting of said Notice. In the event that such a
request is not filed, said commitment and all decision made with
regard thereto shall be final and conclusive.
(d) Reconsideration Upon Filing of Request Therefor.
In the event that a request is filed with the District Secretary
pursuant to subsection (c) hereof, the Secretary shall direct said
request to the District governing body, officer or employee respon-
sible for the District commitment in question and·said body, officer
or employee shall cause said commitment to be reconsidered .
.. 16-
.
EXHIBIT "A"
Designated Positions ·Categories
1. Directors I, II,· III
2. Manager I, II, III
3. District Engineer I, II, v
4. General Counsel I, II, III
5. Secreta_ry IV
6. Treasurer . VI
7. Purchasing Agent IV
8. Construction Superintendent v
9. Treatment Plant Operator IV
10. Waste Disposal Operator IV
11. Right .of Way Agent I
12. Consultants* I, II, III
.. ·
I
*The word "consultant" is defined in Section l.S(b). A
position nominally known as a consultant to the District
is not a designated position herein unless such definition
is satisfied. Thus, a "financial consultant", an
"eneineering consultant" and a '.'bond counsel" in many
instances will not be a consultant herein. Determinations
hereunder shall be made by the governing body of the
District.
EXHIBIT "B"
DISTRICT
--~~-~-~~---~-
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
CATEGORY !--INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY
PLEASE NOTE: Before completing this statement, read ·section 2.S(a)
of the Conflict of Interest Code of this District. ·such Section
describes and limits the items required to be disclosed herein.
(A~tach additional pages if needed.)
A. Designat~d position=~-----~-----~-----~-~
B. Name of designated empl9yee:
~~~---~~---~~~--~
C. Address or precise location of each parcel of real property:
Parcel 1:
-----------------------~
D. Nature of interest i~ each parcel of real property (including
whether the interest is held by you, your spouse or a business
entity or trust in which you or your s_pouse own a ten percen~
interest or more):
E. Ifthe real_property does not ·constitute your principal residence,
does the fair market value of such property exceed $10,000?
Parcel 1: Yes No -------
Parcel 2: Yes No ------
Parcel 3: Yes No ------
F.· If the real property does not constitute your principal residence,
does the fair market value--of such property e~ceed $100,000?
Parcel 1· .. Yes No
Parcel 2: Yes No ---
Parcel 3: Yes No
-i-
FORM I
•It
G. If this disclosure statement is an annual, rather than an
initial, statement and if the interest in the real property was
wholly or partially acquired during the period covered by the
statement, give the date of acquisition of such interest and
the date of disposition, if any.
Parcel l: Acquisition Date:
Disposition Date:
Parcel 2: Acquisition Date:
Disposition Date:
Parcel 3: Acquisition Date:
Disposition Date:
STATE OF.CALIFORNIA )
) SS
County of _____ )
The undersigned,
·perjury, certifies as follows:
under penalty of
. That (s)he has used all reasonable diligence in the preparation
of the foregoing Statement and that to the best of (his) (her)
knowledge it is true and complete.
Signature:
------------------~-----------------
Received by District on ~-----------------• 19~
By:
_T_i_t~l-e-:------------------------~
FORM I
•.
DISTRICT
-----------------------------
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
CATEGORY !!--INVESTMENTS
PLEASE NOTE: Before completing this statement, read Section 2.S(b)
of the Conflict of Interest Code of this District. Such Section
describes and limits the items required to be disclosed herein.
(Attach additional pages if needed.)
B. Name of designated employee: __________________________________ ~
C. Name· and address of the business entity in which each investment
is held.
D. General description of the business activity in which the business
entity is engaged.
E. Nature of each investment (including whether the investment is
held by you, your spouse, or a business entity or trust in which
you or your spouse own a ten percent interest or more):
Investment 1:
----------------------------------~----------------------
F. Does the fair market value of the investment exceed $10,000?
Investment 1:
Investment 2:
Investment 3:
Yes ------Yes Yes ---
-i-
FORM II
___ No
__ No
___ No
G. Does the fair market value of the investment exceed $100,000?
Investment 1:
Investment 2:
Investment 3:
Yes
---Yes
Yes ---
No
No ---No
H. If this disclosure statement is an annual, rather than an
initial, statement and if the investment was wholly or partially
acquired during the period covered by the statement, give the
date of acquisition of such investment and the date of disposi-
tion, if any.
Investment 1: Acquisition Date:
Disposition Date:
Investment 2: Acquisition Date:
Disposition Date:
Investment 3: Acquisition Date:
Disposition Date:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS
County of )
The undersigned,
perjury, certifies as follows:
under penalty of
That (s)he has used all reasonable diligence in the preparation
of the foregoing Statement and that to the best of (his) (her)
knowledge it is true and complete.
Signature:--------~~~~--~~~~~--------~
Received by District on
By:
~T~i-t_l_e_:--------------------------~
-ii-
FORM II
I
. I
I
l
DISTRICT
--~~~~~~~~~~
DISC~OSURE STATEMENT
CATEGORY III--INCOME
PLEASE NOTE: Before completing this statement, read -Section 2.S(c)
of the Conflict of Interest Code of this District. Such Section
describes and limits the items required to be disclosed herein.
(Attach additional pages if needed.)
A. Designated position:
~~~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
B. Name of designated empl~yee:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
C. Name and address of each source of income:
D. General.description of the business.activity of e~ch scurce of
income:
E. Was the aggregate value of income from the source greater than
$1,000?
Source 1: Yes No
Source 2: Yes No
Source 3: Yes No
F. Was the aggregate Vqlue of income from the source greater than
$10 t 000? .
Source 1: Yes No
Source 2: Yes No
Source 3: Yes No
G. Describe the co.nsideration, if any, for which the income was
received.
Source 1:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-i-
FORM III
H. Set forth the amount and the date of receipt of each gift.
Gift 1: , 19 ; $ _______ _
Gift 2:----------, 19-; $
Gift 3: , 19=; $ _______ _
Complete items I through L below where the income of a business
entity in which you or your spouse own a ten percent interest or
more, is being reported:
I. Name and address of each business entity.
Business Entity l:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J. General description of the business activity of each business
entity.
Business Entity l: _____________________ _
Business Entity 3 =---------------------
K. If such business entity which provides legal or brokerage
services, set forth the name of every natural person, non-profit
association or corporation and business entity who paid fees to
such business entity if you or your spouse's pro rata.share of
such fees was $1,000 or more.
Business Entity 2: _____________________ _
Busines·s Entity 3: ____________________ _
L. If such business entity does not provide legal or brokerage
services, set forth the name of every natural person, non-profit
association or corporation, arid business entity from whom such
business entity received payments if you or your spouse's pro
rata share of gross receipts from such person, non-profit
association or corporation, or business entity was $10,000
.. 11-
FORM III
or more during any calendar year partially or wholly covered
by this statement.
Business Entity 1:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS
County of )
The undersigned,
perjury, certifies as follows: ....-T-a-~~~~~~~~~~~~
, under penalty of
That (s)he has used all reasonable diligence in the preparation
of the foregoing Statement and that to the best of (his) (her)
knowledge it is true and complete.
'Signature:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Received by District on
~~~~~~~~~-
19
-iii-
FOR.~ III
r
DISTRICT
-------------~~
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
CATEGORY IV--SUPPLY SOURCES
PLEASE NOTE: Before completing this statement, read Section 2.5(d)
of the Conflict of Interest Code of this District. Such Section
describes and limits the items required to be disclosed herein.
(Attach additional pages if needed.)
A. Designated position:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
B. Name of designated employee:
~~...._~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
C. Name and addr.ess of the business entity in which each investment
is held:
D. General description of the business activity in which the business
entity is engaged:
E. Nature of each investment (including whether the investment is
held by you, your spouse, or a business entity or trust in which
you or your spouse own a ten percent interest or more):
F. Does the fair market value of ·the. investment exceed $10, 000?
Investment 1:
Investment 2:
Investment 3:
Yes
---Yes
Yes
-i-
FORM IV
No ---No
No ---
M. Describe the consideration, if any, for which the income was
received:
N. · Set forth the amount and the date of receipt of each gift:
Gift 1: 19 ; $
Gift 2: . 19-; $------
Gift .3:~~~~~~~~~~~-, 19==; $~~~~~~~
Complete items 0 through Q below where the income of a business
entity in which you or your spouse own a ten percent interest or
more:
0. Name and address ·of each business entity.
Business Entity 1:
~------------------------------------~
Business Entity 2=----------------~--------------------~
Business Entity .3:
--~------------~--------------~----~
P. General description of the business activity of each business
entity.
Business Entity 1:
Business Entity 2:
Business Entity 3:
--------------------------------~----~
Q. Set forth the name of every natural person, non-profit associa-
tion or corporation, and business ~ntity from whom such business
entity received payments if you or your spouse's pro rata share
of gross receipts from such person, non-profit association or
corporation, or business entity was $10,000 or more during any
calendar year_ partially or wholly covered by this state~ent:
Business Entity 1:
~----~--------~----~--------~~--~
Business Entity 2:
------~----_,... ________ ..;._ ______________ ~
-iii-
FORM IV
G. Does the fair market value of the investment exceed $100,000?
Investment 1:
Investment 2:
Investment 3:
Yes
---Yes
Yes ---
No ---No
No ---
H. If this disclosure statement is an annual, rather than an initial,
statement and if the investment was wholly or partially acquired
during the period covered by the statement, give the date of
acquisition of such investment and the date of disposition, if
any.
Investment 1: Date of Acquisition:
Date of Dispo_sition:
Investment 2: Date of Acq.ui.sition:
Date of Disposition:
Investment 3: Date of Acquisition:
Date of Disposition:
I. Name and address of each source of income:
Source 1:
J. General description of the business activity of each source of
income:
K. Was the aggregate value of income from the source greater than
$1,000?
Source 1: Yes No
Source 2: Yes No
Source 3: Yes No
L. Was the aggregate value of income from the source greater than
$10,000? .
Source 1: Yes No
Source 2: Yes No
Source 3: Yes No
-ii-
FORM IV
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS
·county of )
•.
. The undersigned,
perjury, certifies as follows: ~--=-.,,.--~~~~~~~~~~
, under penalty of
That (s)he has used all reasonabl~ diligence in the preparation
of the foregoing Statement and that to the best of (his) (her)
knowledge it is true and complete.
Received by District on ~~~~~~~~~-· 19~ .
. By:
.=T-i-t~l-e-:~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-iv-
FORM IV
G. Does the fair market value of the investment exceed $100,000?
Investment 1:
Investment 2:
Investment 3:
Yes
---Yes
Yes ---
No
---No
No ---
H. If this disclosure statement is an annual, rather than an initial,
statement and if the investment was wholly or partially acquired
during the period covered by the statement, give ·the date of
acquisition of such ~nvestment and the date of disposition, if
any.
Investment 1: Date of Acquisition:
Date of Disposition:
Investment 2: Date of Acquisition:
Date of Disposition:
Investment 3: Date of Acquisition:
Date of Disposition:
I. Name and address of each source of income:
Source 1:
J. General description of the business activity of each source of
income:
K. Was the
$1,000?
aggregate value of income from the source greater than
Source 1: Yes No
Source 2: Yes No
Source 3: Yes No
L~ Was the aggregate value of income from the source greater than
$10,000?
Source 1:
Source 2:
Source 3:
Yes
---Yes
Yes ---
.;.ii-
FORM V
No
---No
No ---
DISTRICT
------------------~--
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
CATEGORY V--CONTRACTORS
PLEASE NOTE: Before completing this statement, read Section 2.S(e)
of the Conflict of Interest Code of this District. Such Section
describes and limits the items required to be disclosed herein.
(Attach additional pages if needed.)
A. Designated position: ______________ ~----------------------------------------
B. Name of designated employee: __________________________________ ~
C. Name and address of the business entity in which each investment
is held:
D. General description of the business activity in which the business
entity is engaged:
E. Nature of each investment (including whether the investment is
held by you, your spouse, or a business entity or trust in which
you or your spouse own a ten percent interest or more):
F.. Does the fair market value of the investment exceed $H>, 000?
Investment 1: Yes No
Investment 2: Yes No
Investment 3: Yes No
-i-
FORM V
M. Describe the consideration, if any, for which the income was
received:
N. Set forth the amount and the date of receipt of each gift:
Gift 1: Gift 2:~~~~~~~~~~~--
19 ; $ 19-; $------
Gift 3:
~-------------~------~--~
19-$
----~~--~~--
Complete items 0 through Q below where the income of a business
entity in which you or your spouse own a ten percent interest or
more:
O. Name and address of each business entity.
Business Entity 1: -----------------------------------------------
Business Entity 2: ------------------------------------------------
P. General description of the business activity of each business
e~tity.
Q.
Business_Entity 1:~------------------------------------------
Business Entity 2:~-----------------------------------------
Business Entity 3=~----------------------------------~-------
Set forth the name of every natural person, non-profit associa-
tion or corporation, and business entity from whom such business
entity received payments if you or-your spouse's pro rata share
of gross receipts from such person, non-profit association or
corporation, or business entity was $10,000 or more during any
calendar year partial~y or wholly covered by this statement:
Business Entity 1:
~------------------------------------------------
.. iii-
FORM V
Business Entity 3: _____________________________________ ___
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS
County of )
The undersigned, ----=-,.--------------------~' under penalty of perjury, certifies as follows:
That (s)he has used all reasonable diligence in the preparation
of the foregoing Statement and that to the best of (his) (her)
knowledge it is true and complete.
Dated: 19_.
Signature:
~-----------------------------------
Received by District on
------------------~
19 .
By:
~T-i_t_i_e_:------------------------~
,.·
-iv-
FORM ~\
DISTRICT --------------------
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
CATEGORY VI--FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
PLEASE NOTE: Before completing this statement, read Section 2.S(f)
of the Conflict of Interest Code of this District. Such Section
describes and limits the items required to be disclosed herein.
(Attach additional pages if needed.)
A. Designated position:
------------------,...---------------~----------------------
B. Name of designated employee:
-----~--------~~--------------------------~
C. Name and address of the business entity in which each investment
is held:
D. General description of the business activity in which the business
entity is engaged:
E. Nature of each investment (including whether the investment is
held by you, your spouse, or a business entity or trust in which
you or your spouse own a ten percent interest or more):
Investment 1:
---------------------------~-------~---------------------
F. Does the fair market value of the investment exceed $10,000?
Investment 1:
Investment 2:
Investment 3:
___ Yes
Yes
---Yes
-i-
FORM VI
No ---No
No ---
i
G. Does the fair market value of the investment exceed $100,000?
Investment 1:
investCTent 2:
Investment 3:
Yes
---Yes
___ Yes
No
---No
No
H. If this disclosure statement is an annual, rather than ·an initial,
statement and if the investment was wholly or partially acquired
during the period covered by the statement, give the date of
acquisition of such investment and. the date of disposition, if
any.
Investment 1: Date of Acauisition:
Date of Disposition:
Investment 2: Date of Acquisition:
Date of Disposition: ...
Investment 3: Date of Acquisition:
Date of Disposition:
I. Name and address of each source of income:
Source 1:
J; General description of the business activity of each source of
income: ...
K. Was the aggregate value of income-from the source greater than
$1,000?
Source 1: ·Yes No
Source 2: Yes No
Source 3: Yes No
L. Was.the aggregate value of income from the source greater than
$10,000?
Source 1:
Source 2:
Source 3:
___ Yes
Yes
---Yes
-ii-
FORM VI
No ---No
No ---
M. Describe the considerati.on, if any, for which the income was
received:
Source 1:
~----------~~--------------------------------~
N. Set forth the amount and the date of receipt of each gift:
Gift 1: I 19 ; $ Gift 2 :---------~--, 19-; $-------
Gift 3: , 19==; $--~~---~-
Complete items· 0 through Q below where the income of a business
entity in· which you or your spouse own a ten percent interest or
more:
0. Name and address of each business entity.
·nusiness Entity 1:
----~--------------------------------~-
Business Entity 2=----------------------~-----------------
Business Entity 3: ________________________________________ _
P.. General description of the business activity of each business
~ntity~
Q.
Business Entity 1:
~---------------------------------------
Business Entity 2: -----------------------------------------
Business Entity 3:~---------------------------------------
Set forth the name of every natural person, non-profit associa-
tion or corporation, and business entity from whom such business
entity received payments if you or your spouse's pro rata share
of gross receipts from such person, non-profit association or
corporation, or business entity was $10,000 or more during any
calendar year partially or wholly covered by ~his statement:
Business Entity l:~------------------------------~-------
-iii-
Business Entity 3=--------------------------------~~~---
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS
.County of )
The undersigned, ------=--------------------~, under penalty of perjury, certifies as follows:
That (s)he has used all reasonable diligence in the preparation of the foregoing Statement and that to the best of (his) (her)
k~owledge it is true and complete.
Dated: 19
--------~--~~~~~ ~
Signature:
~~------~~~~~--~~-----------
Received by District on
~~~~--~·----~--
19 .
-iv-
FORM VI
EXHIBIT "C"
NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the District has ·connnitted
itself to the following course of action:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that in the event that any person
desires the District to reconsider, or disapprove of, said commit-
ment on the ground of the existence of a conflict of interest of
a district officer, employee or consultant, a request for said
reconsideration or disapproval shall be submitted to the Secretary
of the District within thirty (30) days of the date hereof .
. ..
By:
~~~~....--~....--~---~~~~~~~ District Secretary
WJML:
RESOLUTION NO. ---
A RESOLUTION ADO?TING CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of
~----~~~~~~~-
District,
C~lifornia, as follows:
1. That that Code entitled "Conflict of Interest Code,
--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
District", a copy of which
is attached hereto and by r~ference incorporated herein, be, and
is hereby, approved and adopted for the District, subject to the
approval thereof by· the Board of Supervisors of the Co~nty of
· -2. ·· That· the Secretary of this District be, and is hereby,
authorized and instructed to submit a copy of such Code to the
Board of Su~ervisors of ~he County.of~~~~~~~~~~ and to
request said Board of Supervisors to.approve said Code in accordance
with Government Code Section 87303.
* * * * *
. ,.
(Certificate)
_, _, • V'
SUMMARY OF DISTRICT CONFLICT OF
INTEREST CODE
The basic theory of the Code is that certain positions within
the District are deemed to inv6lve the making or participation in .
making of decisions which could foreseeably have a material effect
on a financial interest of the person holding a position. There-
fore persons holding such positions are required to file certain
disclosure statements disclosing certain interests and, in
addition, are required to disqualify themselves in certain instances
· from making specified decisions.
Article I. This Article contains general µrovisions includ-
ing definitions. This Article states that a "designated employee"
is that person which hold the position ("designated position")
within the District which requires the making of decisions encom-
passed by the Code.
·"Designated positions" are those listed in column 1 of
Exhibit "A". Such positions are, by the Code, deemed to involve
the making of decisions which could have a material effect on a
financial interest of the employee or officer making the decision.
"Reportable interests" are those interests which designated
employees must report on disclosure statements, and in essence,
constitute those interests of designated employees which could.be
affected by decision.
This Article also contains a narrow· definition of "consul-
tant". In particular a consultant, to be encompassed by the Code
must possess'authority with respect to District decisions beyond
·the rendition of advice.
Article II. This Article contains the requirement for disclo-
sure statements. It requires persons holding designated positions
to file an initial disclosure statement with the District Secretary
at the time specified in Section 2.3 and to file annual disclosure
statements at the time specified in Section 2.4. The Secretary is
required to forward all of such statements to the Board of Super-
visors. ·
l>isclosure statements, however, need be filed only if the
person holding the designated position has "reportable interests".
If such person does not have reportable interests, then he need not
-file disclosure statements.
· ·Reportable interests are, by Section 2.5, divided into six
'!categories" and Exhibit "A" assigns different categories to the
various designated positions.
The "categories" are generally surrunarized as follows:
Category I relates to interests with a value of more than
$1,000 in real property located within or close to the District.
It includes interests held by the designated employee,·his spouse
or by a business entity owned by t~e employee or his spouse.
. Category II relates to investments with a value of more
than $1,000 in business entities having real property in the District
or doing or planning to do business in the District. It includes
investments held by the designated employee, his spouse or by a
business entity owned by the employee or·his spouse.
r
Category III relates to sources of income aggregating $250
or more or of gifts aggregating $25 or more if the source is
(generally) located within or doine.business within the District.
It includes sources of income to the designated employee, his
spouse or a business entity and by the employee or his spouse.
Category IV relates to investments in and income from busi-
ness entities which manufacture or sell supplies or equipment to
the District.
Category V relates to investment·s in and income from
contractors.
Category VI relates to investments in and income from
financial institutions.
The Article describes the information which is to be
given about each "category" and refers to forms attached to the
Code which are to be completed. For the most part, the informa-
tion required is general in nature.
Article III. This Article contains disqualification
requirements. It requires that persons holding the positions
designated in Exhibit ''A" disqualify themselves from making or
participating in making a decision when it is reasonably fore~ee-
. able that his financial interest may be materially affected by the
decision. The terms "making a decision", "participating in the
making of a decision", "financial interest" and "materially affected"
are defined.
Generally, a "financial interest" is the same as an interest
which requires disclosure under Article II and whether an interest
will be "materially affected" in a matter to be determined by the
person concerned, after he considers certain factors.-If he
decides that disqualification is necessary he must accompany the
disqualification by a disclosure of the financial interest made
a part of the District's records or made in writing to the person's
supervisor or appointing power.
This Article also establishes a procedure for reconsideration
of District action where a conflict of interest is alleged to
exist. It requires the District Secretary to post a Notice of
Action Taken whenever any designated employee has disqualified
himself from a decision and the District subsequently connnits
itself to a definite course of action with regard to the subject
to which such decision pertains. It authorizes the District
Secretary to post such a Notice in other circumstances.
Whenever a Notice is posted pursuant to the Article, a
request for reconsideration of said Dist~ict connnitment must be
·made within thirty (30) days of the date of posting of the Notice.
Enforcement. Government Code Section 87300 provides that
any violation of a local Code is a violation of Chapter 7 of
Proposition (Title) 9. Chapter 11 of Proposition 9 provides the
following penalties for violation of the Law.
. 1. Willful violation is misdemeanor and, in addition to
other misdemeanor penalties, the violator is liable for a fine
equal to the greater of $10,000 or three times the· amount not
properly reported.
-2-
2. Violation is subject to discipline by the·District,
including dismissal.
3. Negligent violation subjects the violator to civil
action for an amount equal to the amount not properly reported
and for an amount up to three times of the amount of economic
benefit.
4. A judicial action to enjoin the vtolation may be brought
and if an official action is taken which ~he court determines might
not otherwise have been taken or approved, the court may set aside
the official action as void.
. ..
-3-·
REFERENCE CHART
Section in Source of Section in Source of Local Code Section* Local Code Section*
1.1 G 87300 First proviso G 82030
1.2 second sentence 1.3 Next to last
1.4 G 87303 paragraph G 82030(a)
.1. 5 (a) c·s2oos first sentence 1. 5(b) R _18700(a) (2) Last paragraph G 82030(b) 1. 5(c) 2. 5 (d) G 87302(b) 1. 5 (d) second sentence
1. 5 (e) G 87302(a) 2.5(e) G 87302(b) l.S(f) G 87302(b) second sentence
f~S(g) first sentence 2. 5 (f) G 87302(b)
second sentence l.5(h) G 87302(b) 2·. 6 G 87302(b)
third sentence fourth sentence 1. 5 (i) 2. 6 (a) G 87206(c) ·2.1 G 87302(b) 2.6(b) G 87206 (a)
first sentence 2.6(c) . G 87206 (d) I 2.2 R 18115 (a) 2. 6 (d) G 87206(f) ' ·2. 3(a) G 87302(b) 2.7 G 87302(b) l
sixth sentence fourth sentence f 2.3(b) G 87302(b) 2. 7 (a) G 87206(b) ' l seventh sentence 2. 7 (b) G 87206(b) l 2.3(c) c· 87302 (b) 2.7(c)· G 87206 (a)
eighth sentence ·2.7(d) G 87206 (d) I 2.4 G 87302(b) 2.7(e) G 87206 (f) I first sentence 2.8 G 87302(b) 2.5 G 87302(b) fifth sentence
second sentence 2.8(a) G 87207(a)(l) I 2.S(a) G 87302(b) 2.8(b) G 87207(a)(l) I second sentence 2.8(c) G 87207(a)(2) I
t 2.S(a) (1) G 82035 2.8(d) G 87207(a)(3) i ·2.5(a)(2) G"82033 2.8(e) G 87207 (a) (4) i first sentence 2.8(f) (1) G 87207 (b) (1) 2.5(~) (3) G 82033 2.8(f)(2) G 87207(b)(2) l
First proviso G 82033 2.8(£) (3) G 87207 (b) (3) t · Second proviso G 87206(e) 2. 9 . G 87206 and 87207 2.5(b) G 87:302 (b) 3.1· G 87302(c)
second sentence 3.2 R 18700(b) 2.S(b)(l) G 82034 3.3 R 18700(c)
·first sentence 3~4 R 18700(d)
and G 82035 3.5 . G 87302(c) 2.5(b)(2) G 82034 second sentence
second sentence and G 87103 2. 5 (b)(3) G 82034 ~3.6(a) R 18702(a) First proviso G 82034 3.6(b) R 18702(b) fourth sentence 3.6(c) R 18702(c) . Second proviso G 87206 (e) 3.7 Last paragraph G 82034
third sentence
-2.5(c) G 87302(b) -----------------second sentence
·2.scc><1> G 87302(b) *.Ga Government Code
third sentence R = Regulations of the Fair 2.5(c)(2) G 87207(a)(l) Political Practices Commission 2.5(c)(3) G 82030(a) in Division VI, Title 2 of the
California Administrative Code
-~
WJML:
RESOLUTION NO. ---
A RESOLUTION SETTING TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING
ON PROPOSED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of
-------District, ~--------
·county, California, as
follows:
WHEREAS, Government Code Sect~on 87300 requires every local
government agency to adopt and promulgate a Conflict of Interest
Code;
WHEREAS, there has been presented to this Board a proposed
Conflict of Interest Code for this District·, a copy of which is on
file with the --------of the District; and
\ wHEREAS, Government Code Section 87311 requires that the
r.eview and preparation of Conflict of Interest Codes shall be
. .
carried out under procedures which guarantee officers, employees,
members, and consultants of the District and to residents of the·
jurisdiction adequate notice and a fair opportunity to pres~nt
their views ;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED:
1. That ~-----~' the -~ day of ~--~--· 1976,
at the hour of ___ o'clock _.M .. , in the regular meeting place of
this Board, . ,
California, be'· and the same are hereby, appointed and fixed as the
time and place when and where this Board.will consider and decermine
whether.the aforesaid proposed Conflict of Interest Code shall be
adopted.
2.. That the of this District be, and is
hereby, directed to give notice of said hearing by publication of
this resolution Ln full once, at least ten days prior to said hearing,
in the ~---------=-------' a newspaper of general
c~rculation in the District.
3. That the ~------of this District be, and is hereby,
directed to distribute one copy of this resolution together with
one copy of the aforesaid Conflict of Interest Code to each person
or persons holding positions within the District enumerated in
Exhibit "A" of said Code.
4. That the
~~~~~~~~
of this District.be, and is
hereby, "directed to file copies of said Conflict of Interest Code
in the Di.strict office to be available for distribution to persons
requesting the same.
* * * * *
(Certificate)
. •'
-2-
~·
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX Bl 27, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
April 29, 1976
NOTICE TO THE EXECUTIVE cor~liITTEE
Don Winn, Chairman
Norma B. Gibbs, Vice Chairman
Kerm Rima
Phillip Cox
John Garthe
Supv. Laurence J. Schmit
Re: Committee Meeting May 4, 1976 -5:30 p.m.
Chairman Winn has asked us to advise you that there will be
a meeting of the Executive Committee at the above hour and
date in the Districts' offices. A brief report on items to
be discussed is attached.
The meeting is scheduled to begin at 5:30 p.rn., and dtn:rier
will be served at 6:30 p.m.
Enclosures
~'{/,~~
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
cc: Directors Milan Dostal and Vernon Evans
Tom Woodruff, General Counsel
TELE PH ON ES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
----..,.
April 29, 1976
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
. P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORN IA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
MANAGER'S REPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: May 4, 1976 -5:30 p.m.
Chairman Winn has called thi~ meeting for 5:30 p.m. Directors
Milan Dostal and Vernon Evans have been invited to attend and
participate in the discussions.
1. Treatment Plant Capital Outlay Budget for 1976-77.
The staff is in the process of preparing budget recommendations
for the 76/77 Joint Operating and Joint Construction budgets. They
will be considered by the Executive Committee in the latter part of
May. With the recent acceleration of the State and Federal grant
program, our long-range cash-flow projections for the joint works
construction program are no longer valid. In fact, we project that
it will be necessary to increase the Districts' tax contribution to
the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund budget from $2.5 million per year
to $6 million per year for the next three to five years. We have
anticipated some of this increase and reserves have been set up in
the individual Districts' Accumulated Capital Outlay funds. How-
ever, at least three of the Districts will have difficulty making
their contributions without rescheduling District projects or
seeking new revenues.
The staff will be prepared to go into more detail at Tuesday's
meeting. Attached is a brief explanation of our money needs in
support of an accelerated construction program.
2. Consideration of a Conflict of Interest Code.
The General Counsel is recommending the adoption of the enclosed
Conflict of Interest Code which has been developed by the California
Association of Sanitation Agencies Attorneys' Committee to comply
with the requirements of Chapter 7, Title 9 of the Government Code.
Enclosed is a separate report from Mr. Woodruff.
It is the staff's recomm e ndation that all personnel in manage-
ment and supervisory classifications be required to file in accordance
with the Code.
3. Request of the Garden Grove Sanitary District for Waiver
of Connection Fees .
At the March 30th meeting of the Executive Committee, considera-
tion was given to a request from the Garde n Grove Sanitary District
f
for waiver of connection charges for 21 existing homes in a
proposed sewer assessme nt District. The Committee directed the
staff to obtain information concerning the .amount of property
taxes paid the Districts for the subject properties. The staff
has determined that something less than $1,000 taxes have been
paid by the subject properties since the inception of the
District for operation and maintenance of a sewer s ys tem fr om
which these properties have received no benefit to date.
4 .. Amending Agreement with J. R. Gilbert and Associates
Dated March 26 , 1 975.
On March 26 , 1975, the Boards authorized the engagement of
J. R. Gilbert and Associates to prepare the Environmental I mpa ct
Statement for the Districts' Facilities Plan. The Environmental
Impact Statement is being prepared jointly with the Environmental
Protection Agency and funded with 87~% State and Federal Step I
grant funds. In recent discussions with the State and EPA, the
scope of the Environmental Impact Statement has been expanded at
EPA's insistence involving additional work for the consulting
firm. Attached is a staff explanation of the required addi tional
work and the estimated costs associated with same.
5. Authority to Pay Directors Compensation and Per Diem
When Participating in Activities to the Benefit of the Dis tricts .
Presently, the General Manager has the authority to desig nate
members of the Boards and staff to attend meetings, conferences,
and other functions within the State of California which will be
of value to the Districts. It is requested that this authority
be extended to provide when the General Manager r equest s attendance
by Directors, with the concurrence of the Joint Chairman, that
Directors attending will be paid compensation and expense r eim-
bursement pursuant to existing Districts' resolutions establishing
compensation and expense reimbursement policies.
We are requesting this provision to remove any doubt or concern
when a Director is asked to serve or represent the Districts at
~··
a function within the State, that they be assured of allowable
compensation and expense r eimbursement . Currently, the authority rests
with the Board(s) and authorization for payment of compensation for
attendanc e at meetings must either be approved in advance or re-
quested after the date of participation.
6. Procedures for Obtaining Engineering Services.
Now that the selection committee has had the benefit of
negotiating engineering services in connection with the design of
the 75 mgd Activated Sludge Treatmen t Facilities at Plant No. 2,
-2-
_,.._._
'.
Selection Committee members may wish to comment on the procedures
which have been adopted by the Boards. The s _e1ection procedures
became effective February 11th and are to be reviewed for modifi-
cations sometime between August and October.
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
-3-
MEMORANDUM
April 29, 1976
TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager
FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
SUBJECT: Capital Outlay Revolving Fund, Fiscal Year 1976-77
In March of 1974 the Districts forwarded to the State Water Resources Control
Board and EPA a project report for improved treatment of Plant No. 2. This
project report called for an expenditure of $275 million to meet the State and
Federal requirements for ocean discharge.
Based upon this report and the needs surveys for treatment facilities required
to meet the discharge requirements, the Districts facilities have been included
in the project list as adopted by the State B~ard and as approved by the EPA
for the following projects:
1.
2.
3.
4.
s.
6.
75 MGD of secondary treatment at Plant No. 2
24 MGD expansion of premary treatment at Plant No. 2
Phase 2 expansion of primary flows at Plants Nos. 1 & 2
Secondary treatment of Plants Nos. 1 & 2
Expansion in improved treatment including headworks
addition at Plant No. 1
Expansion and improvement of secondary treatment at
Plants Nos. l and 2, Phase 2
Total
$. 73,800,000
4,400,000
24,400,000
36,900,000
·125, 000, 000
125,000,000
$389,500,000
Although the project list as approved by the State may not represen~ the true
project cost, it does indicate an extreme high level of construction activities
for the joint works facilities.
The Board has recently approved the design effort for 75 MGD of improved treatment
at Plant No. 2 which the estimated construction ~ost is approximately $61~ million.
The State has requested that we analyse our cash flow situation in order that we
might consider the commencing of the design of an additional 50 MGD a day of
improved treatment at Plant No. 2 in August of this year pending the results of the
-. ' ...
Fred A. Harper
April 29, 1976
Page Two
JPL-ACTS Process Pilot Plant effort. It is estimated that this second phase
of improved treatment at Plant No. 2 will be approximately $50 million. The
State as well as the EPA is most anxious to obligate grant construction funding
before the September 30, 1977 deadline in order that the State of California
does not lose its allocation as provided by the Congress 1972 amendment to the
Clean Water Act. If the Districts are to proceed to meet the NPDES discharge
requirements and to contract for ~ver $100 million in the summer of 1977, the
CORF budget must be increased considerably over what has been experienced in
the past few years. The past CORF budgest adopted by the Boards raised by
taxes are as follows:
1968-69
1969-70
1970-71
1971-72
1972-73
1973-74
1974-75
$4,180,000
3,800,000
3,800,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
2,500,000
2,500,000
It is estimated that the CORF budget for the 1976-77 fiscal year will be
approximately $6,000,000. It is suggested that the staff present the capital
expenditure program to the Executive Committee at their scheduled meeting of
May 4th in order that they may apprise the Joint Board as to the level of
effort involved with meeting the clean water bond laws of the State and EPA.
REL:ss
. ..._.,,
RICHARD 0. F'RAZEE
STEPHEN C.STEWART
THOMAS L. WOODRUF'F'
JEF'F'REY A. HARTMAN
LAW OFFICES
Stewd rt, \VooJ ruff & f razce
1055 NORTH MAIN STREET, SUITE 1020
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701
April 29, 1976
Boards of Directors .
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject: Adoption of Conflict of Interests Code
AREA CODE 71'4
835-6212
As each of you has been made aware, the provisions of the Political
Reform Act of 1974 (Proposition 9) are now being implemented and
specifically require all local public agencies to adopt a conflict
of interest code that will apply to its officers and employees.
On behalf of the County Sanitation Districts, the code will be
adopted by the Board of Directors of each District and will be
submitted to the Orange County Board of Supervisors for their
review and approval. The Board of Supervisors has established
the date of August 1, 1976 as the final date for submission of
the District's code.
The Executive Committee is being requested to review the draft
of the code which is the basis upon which the specific code will
be submitted to the full Boards at the meeting of June. This
draft code is the product of the Attorneys Committee for the
California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) and, in
my opinion, is the best product of efforts to have a comprehen-
sive yet simplified set of rules. It is considerably more
specific than the model code proposed by the League of California
Cities and, while a few paragraphs will need to be changed to
more precisely identify the factual situation with our Districts,
the substance is basically being recommended by my office.
It now appears that the code will be made to apply to the super-
visory category employees of the District, in view of the fact
that they generally have the ability to make or participate in
the making of decisions which could foreseeably have a material
effect on a financial interest of the person holding their
position. Additionally, a few other categories will necessarily
COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM No. 2
Boards of Directors
April 29, 1976
Page Two
I
I
I
have to be included because of the particular responsibilities
of the jol:smeeting the same criteria.
It is also being recommended that the code to be adopted by the
Districts will require the consultants to the Districts, such as
enginee ring firms and general counsel, be made to comply with all
of its provisions. I do point out, however, that there are some
exceptions, such as a consultant who owns l ess than a 1 0% interest
in the firm which is being retained by the District need not
disclose, on the basis of a minimum involvement.
With regard to the form of the reporting requirements, it is
substantially similar to that presently being required of ·most
Directors in their capacities as members of the City Councils.
Finally, with respect to the adoption of the code, we are, as
noted above, required to submit our adopted code to the Board
of Supervisors by August 1, 1976. ·Howe v er, the code that will
be submitted to the Board for approval will include my recom-
mendation that it not become effective as a law governing the
officers and employees of the District until Januar y 1, 1977.
This recommendation is based primarily upon the fact that no
effective date is required as a matter of State law and,
secondly, it will avoid one additional filing during 1976
in view of the numerous filings that have already been made
by most Directors. Likewise, the actual filing date is not
yet determined, but at this point it would appear that the
~onth of Ap ril will be selected as the annual anniversary
date. The purpose of thi s is to coincide with the re p orting
dates that the Directors will experience as members of the
City Councils and, therefore, will prevent an unnecessary
amount of duplicate efforts spread through several mon ths
of the year.
x:;d~~·
General Counsel
TLW:·ab
EXHIBIT "A"
{Revised)
AGENDA ITEM #12(A)
Designated Positions Categories
1.
2.
3.
4.
s.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Directors I, II, III
General Manager I, II, III
Director of Finance and I, II, III
Board Secretary
Chief Engineer I, II, III
Superintendent I, II, III
General Counsel I, II, III
Consultants* I, II, III
Supervisory Personnel as set forth I, II, III
in Districts' salary resolution,
as amended
Lead Storeskeeper I, II, III
*The word "consultant" is defined in Section l.S(b). A position
nominally known as a consultant to the District is not a
designated position herein unless such definition is satisfied.
Thus, a "financial consultant", an "engineering consultant" and
a "bond counsel" in many instances will not be a consultant
herein. Determinations hereunder shall be made by the govern-
ing body of the District.
April 15, 1976
Mr. Ray Lewis
Chief Engineer
County Sanitation Districts
of ·orange County
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
'. B. Gilbert & Associates
Planning & Engineering Consultants
1101 R Street, Sacramento. Ca 95814
(916) 444-0123
,.
D Bay Area Office:
Claremont Hotel, Berke le)~ Ca 04 705
(415) 843-0208
D Tahoe Office:
2155 South Street. P. o. Box 14446
South Lake Tal1oe. Ca 9S702
(916) 541·5775
·FILED
In tha Office of the Secretary
County Sanitation District No---------
MAY 1 2 1976
~--Costs of Additional Work on Draft EIR/EIS
Dear Mr. Lewis:
At the March 18 meeting with EPA and SWRCB representatives, an
extensive amount of supplemental EIR/EIS work was requested.
This is an addition to the expanded scope resulting from initial
EPA review of the first five chapters.
EPA has indicated its desire to make this EIR/EIS a major
decision-making document on such subjects as marine impacts and
air quality mitigation measures. Additional work resulting from
EPA's request includes a detailed analysis of wastewater
reclamation options, further air quality investigations, more
extensive use of graphics, a change in organization of the report
from the initial outline, and additional information on land use,
population growth, marine biology, and measures to mitigate air
quality impacts.
Attachment 1 to this letter is a cost estimate for the work that
remains to be done. As of early April, we have spent approxi-
mately $52,000 of our initial $60,000 authorization. We estimate
that the draft document will be delayed three to four months and
cost an additional $100,000. Also attached is a revised schedule
for completion of the EIS.
While EPA has indicated satisfaction with the technical content
of work to date, their staff members must be satisfied with the
document since it is essentially EPA's EIS. \vhile much of the
information being developed will not be of direct benefit to the
wastewater function in Orange County, it will provide a valuable
reference doc1ment for a variety of public agencies and can help
clarify the controversial issues of marine disposal and air
quality mitigation.
Consulting Services 0 E11\·ironn1cnt D \\'<..itcr D \\';_istcwatcr D c;ovcrnn:cntal Aff(lirs
Mr. Ray Lewis 2 Ap17il 15, 1976
During the course of this work, we have made every effort to keep
costs to.a minimum. Kris Lindstrom's familiarity with the County
and the Districtts activities as well as our firm's experience
in EIS work has helped. liowever, EPA has firmed up and expanded
its view of the EIR/EIS. While these additional costs are ·
certainly significant, they are consistent with the level of
effort currently being undertaken by EPA in major regional EIS's
in other parts of the State. If you would like additional
information regarding the attached budget and additional scope
of work, we would be glad to provide it in writing or meet with
you and appear before the District Board.
Very truly yours,
J. B. GILBERT & ASSOCIATES
0('~~-01
Jer[}rne B. Gilbert
Attachments
tJ)
(l)
..........
rJ ·o
0
{f)
tf) <
Planning & En1::~inecring Consult~mts J.13. G i llJCrt 0
.·
ATTACHMENT 1
SUMMARY OF ANTICIPATED COSTS
CSDOC EIR/EIS
After May 1, 1976
Development of supplemental information and dat~
requested by EPA for incorporation in the draft
including:
Marine biology
Air quality
Land use
Institutional framework and
mitigation measures
Miscellaneous supplemental work
Report preparation expenses
including drafting and
additional typing
Printing of Draft EIR/EIS
Contingency
$ 6,000
3,000
6,000
5,000
5,000
15,000
35,000
10,000
$ 85,000
Additional work on development of reclamation
alternatives for incorporation into the
Facilities Plan and EIR/EIS:
Engineering
Environmental assessment
Total additional anticipated costs of
preparing Draft EIR/EIS
$ 10,000
5,000
$ 15,000
$100,000
Note: These costs do not include the preparation of
responses to the comments on the Draft EIR/EIS nor
printing. Our experience has.been that these costs
are a minimum of $25,000 equally divided between
reproduction of the Final EIS and professional time.
The exact level of effort required should be determined
by the District and EPA following the corrunent period.
U)
0.) -w
•--C u
("""\ v
{f)
ti) <
Planning·"-Enginccrin~ Consul kin ts J.13. G i lt)Crt 0
ATTACHMENT 2
PROJECTED SCHEDULE
CSDOC EIR/EIS
Tasks
1. Preliminary Draft
Facilities Plan
2. First Preliminary Draft
EIS (All Chapters)
3. EPA Branch Review
(All Chapters)
· 4. Consultant Revision
(Submit Second Preliminary
Draft)
5. EPA Division Review,
Advisory Committee Review
6. Consultant Revision
(Submit Final Draft)
7. EPA Review and Signature
Change
B. Draft Printing and
Distribution (Mailing to
CEQ)
9. Public Notice for Public
Hearing
10. Public Hearing
11. Final EIS Published
Task
Completion Date
2/20/76
6-:6130/16
7/15/76
8/15/76
9/15/76
11/1/76
11/22/76
Christmas season,
delay mailing:
Recommend 1/10/76
1/13/76
2/17/76
6/1/77
Elapsed Time
6 weeks
5 weeks
4 weeks
.4 weeks
3 weeks
3 weeks
4 weeks
3 days
5 weeks
3-1/2 months
(/)
Q)
-+--< ro ·o
0
(/)
(/) <
Planning & Engineering Consult~111ts J.B. Gill)ert cZ
ATTACHMENT 3
TASK DESCRIPTIONS
REVIEW OF MARINE IMPACT ANALYSIS
BY AN INDEPENDENT CONSULTAHT
The assessment of marine impacts associated with the past, present,
and projected CSDOC discharge has been completed. In order to
assure that this section contains an objective and thorough
presentation of the important impacts relating to the discharge
and the potential effects from improved treatment, it is
desirable to obtain an independent evaluation and review by a
qualified outside consultant.
This outside evaluator would review and recommend changes in the
drafts including impacts assessments and technical conclusions.
We have approached a well qualified individual at Scripps
Institute of Oceanography to pursue this task. This may result
in additional work after we reorganize the information as requested
by EPA, which has not yet reviewed the material in detail.
AIR QUALITY
EPA has requested additional work on air quality including
quantification of impacts specifically within the CSDOC service
area. Air pollutant projections and an air quality analysis based
upon projected growth have recently been updated reflecting the
latest air pollutant emissions inventory and emissions forecasting
methods. Additional information has been requested on: health
effects and environmental impacts such as vegetation damage,
regional trends and programs, and the recent efforts of the Air
Quality Maintenance Planning effort.
LAND USE
More detailed information and quantification of changes ir. land
use within the Districts' service area has been requested. This
additional effort will entail considerable in-depth analysis
and basic data collection. Specific changes in the amount of
agricultural land committed to urban development; the influence
of the State Coastal Plan on subregional growth; more detailed
discussions of soils, geologic hazards, flooding, and urban form
l/)
0
.... -Cu ·-u
0
(f)
(/)
Planning & Engineering Consult~111t.s
< J. [3. C.Jilbert c:6
.. ,
2
have been requested. A minimum effort to meet the additional
requests for data and graphics is estimaied to cost $6,000. If
analysis of individual City General Plans for all 23 cities
within the Districts' service area is required, costs will be
much higher. At the present time, such detailed analyses are not
anticipated, although specific plans will be examined with
regard to environmentally critic~l areas such as the Balsa
Chica wetlands area. ·
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK AND
MITIGA'f ION MEASURES
Additional work effort is anticipated in analyzing mitigation
measures within the CSDOC service area and developing institutional
arrangements for implementing some of these measures. More in-
depth analysis of the effectiveness of air quality mitigation
measures has been suggested. Also, preparation of additional
material for and our participation iri mitigation workshops with
local agencies is anticipated. A minimum cost of $5,000 is
presently anticipated, but this could be increased if
additional analysis is requested or extensive participation is
required for meetings.
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLEMENTAL WORK
Additional information and analyses is required on water supply
and regulatory programs, and how they effect the Districts'
programs including air pollution control, transportation planning,
health and water quality regulations, and land use planning. It
is anticipated that this will require a minimum of $5,000 of
work effort to obtain the basic information requested.
OTHER PRODUCTION EXPENSES
Due to the extensive nature of this report which is now
approximately 700 pages in length, a major effort has been
expended in terms of typing, editing, drafting, xeroxing, and
preparing review copies for EPA. Revisions involving rewriting,
updating, incorpor~ting changes, final editing, and the prepara-
tion of additional graphics will require extensive staff time.
Attendance at meetings, travel, telephone bills, xeroxing, and
other related expenses also accompanying any work effort of this
magnitude. These costs are estimated at $15,000. This also
includes additional work in developing a su..mmary document for use
during the public participation phases of the planning program.
{./)
CJ
+--"' cu ·-u
0
tf'J
<J)
Planning & Engineering Consull<1nts
<
J.B. GilL1crt ~
._,-
3
ADDITIONAL COSTS
Graphic~
EPA has reque~ted that more extensive graphics be used in th~
EIS. This includes the use of large colored foldout or cover
jacket maps identifying land use, sewer collection systems, and
other features of the Districts' service area. The preparation
of these graphics will involve considerable added expense and
add substantially to printing and binding costs.
Printing
EPA has requested a minimum of 1,000 copies of the EIS in
addition to a printed summary. The size of the report, estimated
to be well over 700 pages, combined with the color graphics will
result in considerable expense for this particular item.
Detailed estimates of costs can only be made after all the graphics
are finalized and the final report is near completion at which
time the exact number of pages will be known. However, it is
estimated that printing and associated costs may be as high as
$35,000 •
Pl~111! 1in~.J, & En~_~inccrin~~ Consult<1nts J. L3. c; illJcrt c;j
.. ·
··_ : ~.
ATTACHMENT 4
TASK DESCRIPTION OF
SUPPLEMENTAL ENGINEERING WORK
PREPARATION OF WASTENATER RECLAMATION
ALTERNATIVES AND THEIR IMPACTS
EPA and the State Board have reques~ed a more detailed and
thorough evaluation of water supply mana~9ment and wastewater
··reclamation alternatives to meet local water needs. Additional
analysis of existing and projected water needs and the true cost
of obtaining these supplies was requested by EPA (i.e., the
environmental costs in terms of impacts such as energy, consumer
costs, subsidized costs, capital investment, etc.) rather than
just the price paid at the wholesale or local level. This
information would be used by decision-makers in assessing the
advantages and disadvantages of alternative water supply sources
including reclaimed wastewater.
We also propose to assess various wastewater reclamation alt9r-
natives and analyze them with regard to feasibility and
environmental impacts including costs, energy consumption,
resource utilization, and environmental and public health
impacts.
This work would be done by Mr. Al Doyle whose qualifications and
experience were described in an earlier letter and our firm's
brochure.
A descriptive work plan for the wastewater reclamation aspects
of the Districts' Facilities Plan and EIR/EIS is attached for
your review.
In summary, the reclamation study proposed would evaluate
various alternatives and make recommendations regarding further
more detailed engineering and environmental work needed to
implement the more viable alternatives.
C/)
<l)
+-' ro ·-u
0
U)
tf) <
Planning & Engineering ConsulliJn1s J.B. Gill)Cri 0
ATTACHMENT 5
·PROPOSED WORK PLAN OUTLINE FOR
RECLAMATION/REUSE ALTERNATIVES
. I. Analysis of Effluent Reuse Options
A. Introduction
B. Irrigation Reuse
1. Agricultural Reuse
a. of or Present Study Area Agricultural
Water Use Practices, Costs, and Water
Quality Effects.
(1) Identify those agricultural areas and
activities where reuse of secondary
effluent would be acceptable from the
public health and irrigation water
quality standpoint. (This limits
the reuse areas considerably since
secondary effluent could not be used
for truck crops, etc.).
(2) Describe the present source and quality
of water for irrigation in the potential
reuse areas of (1) above. Describe the
existing irrigation water distribution
and application systems in raajor
potential reuse areas.
(3) Describe the present practices for
disposal of agricultural return water
in potential reuse areas (whether
discharged via drainage systems to
surface water courses, allowed to
percolate to groundwater, etc.).
b. Facilities, Cost, and Water Quality Impacts
of Reuse of Secondary Effluent for Irrigation
in Identified Potential Reuse Areas.
:r:
A I
, ' v
~
'J, <
Pl<1nning l~ F.n~~i11ccri11~~Consult;111ts J. r_-).CiillJt Tl :Z
2
(1) Evaluate the need for special irrigation
practices and controls to permit the
sustained reuse of secondary effluent
without endangering soil productivity,
water quality, public health, etc.
(2) Show the quantities of effluent that
could be utilized at each reuse area.
Discuss the seasonal aspects of use and
provide a monthly breakdown of
potential reuse.
(3) For each of the potential irrigation
reuse areas, compute the irrigation
return waste loads to the ultimate
receiving waters. Compare these loads
to the loads from present agricultural
practice on the same_ land areas.
2. Landscape Irrigation Reuse
a. A survey of potential users prepared by the
Orange County lvater District has already been
completed. Using this basic data, a more
complete evaluation would be made to discuss
economics and water quality and public health
effects from effluent reuse in parks, golf
courses, greenbelts, freeway rights-of-way,
etc., where present and planned water use
occurs in fairly sizeable blocks.
b. After evaluation of costs and screening for
environmental impacts, recommendations on
water delivery, operation, monitoring, etc.,
will be made for the most feasible alternatives
identified.
C. Industrial Reuse
1. Survey Present Study Area Industrial Water Use
a. Describe the current study area industrial water
use and provide a map showing the locations of
industries which use significant quantities of
water.
3
b. Identify those industries which could use
secondary effluent as a total or partial supply.
Rationale for exclusion of users of substantial
quantities of water from the potential reuser
group must clearly show that such reuse is ·
not technically or economically feasible. At
this stage of analysis contractual commitments
by industry to water suppliers will not be
considered as precluding adoption of a substitute
reclaimed water supply.
c. Describe the source and quality of present water
supplies to each of the major reuser industries.
Show the present and projected quantity of water
used by each category and the unit cost of the·
present supply. Discuss any seasonal aspects
of the water use.
d. Estimate the operational 6osts associated with
pretreatment of present water supplies and show
the total cost of procuring and preparing the
present supply for industrial use (in dollars
per acre-foot) .
e. Quantify the present waste loads from major
waste dischargers and show the resultant mass
emissions to the Districts' facilities.
2. Special Considerations, Facilities, Cost, and
-Water Quality Effects of Reuse of Secondary Effluent
for Potential Industrial Users.
a. For major potential reuser industries, evaluate
the need for process modification, pretreatment
and post-treatment necessary to facilitate the
use of secondary effluent.
b. Describe additional on-site facilities or process
modification necessary to substitute effluent for
existing source water and estimate the cost of
these facilities for potential reusers. ·
c. Estimate the quantities of effluent that could be
used by user categories.
:_;
'"' fJ
Jj
./' .....
Pl<ln11 in~~ .~ F.ll~-~i 11l'( ·rint-~ Consu It; 111ts J F~. ( ~ i l lJl Tl ::~
4
d. Compute the waste loads to the Districts'
facilities form an industrial reuse program
and show them as mass emissions to the District's
facilities. Compare these loads to the loads
from the same industries under existing wate~
supply conditions.
D. Groundwater Recharge
1. Reuse for Salt Water Intrusion Barrier
a. Provide a description of present salt water
intrusion problems and a map showing ground-
water aquifers and extent of intrusion.
b •. Identify those areas or activities where reuse
of secondary effluent would be acceptable from
the public health and water quality standpoint.
c. Identify any potential intrusion barrier projects
other than those presently being proposed or
implemented.
d. Estimate the operational costs, energy usage,
and effects on water supply and groundwater from
potential salt water intrusion barrier projects.
2. Groundwater Recharge
·a. Provide a description of present grouridwater
recharge programs, a map showing locations of
facilities, and operating cost for these
facilities. Provide a breakdown by quantity
and quality of waters used in these programs.
b. Assess the ·feasibility of supplementing these
supplies with reclaimed effluent that has
received advanced treatment. Estimate the
costs of doing this, the institutional, public
health, and water quality considerations and
constraints.
U)
\...) ......
("J ·-u
0
U)
UJ
/ ......
Planninf~ & En~~inccring Consultants J.13. (; i} bCrt :~
t .. 1 •
5
E. Recreation Reuse (includes wildlife enhancement)
1. Surv~y of Present Study Area Recreational Water Use
a. Describe the present study area recreational ·
water use and provide a map showing locations
of the Santa Ana River and Santiago Creek systems
and existing and planned recreational water
impoundments including wetlands projects.
b. Identify those existing or planned recreational
projects for which .secondary effluent could be
used as a total or partial supply considering .
the water quality required for protection of
public health and the uses of the recreational
waters.
c. Describe the present or proposed source and
quality of makeup water to the potential
recreation reuse areas and show the water
quantities and the estimated total cost
per acre-foot of the present or proposed
supply delivered to the recreation
site. Discuss seasonal aspects of the project
water demand.
d. Describe the present or proposed practice with
respect to operation of the recreation site
particularly the ultimate receiving water
(ocean, Santa Ana River, and/or groundwater)
for outflows from the recreational system.
e. Quantify the mass emissions of TDS, nutrients,
heavy metals, BOD, fl.ow, etc. to the ultimate
receiving water from the potential recreation
reuse system under its current water supply.
2. Special Considerations, Facilities, Cost, and Water
Quality Effects of Reuse of Secondary Effluent in
Potential Reuser Recreation Systems
a. Estimate the quantities of effluent that could be
used in recreational water projects and disc~ss
any seasonal aspects of the use.
'I. ,. .
...
,.
6
b. Estimate the mass emissi6ns of TDS, nutrients,
~low, BOD, etc., to the ultimate receiving water
from the reuse system and compare these emissions
to the emissions with use of nonwaste supply
water source.
E. Program of Integrated Agricultural, Landscape
Irrigation, Industrial, and Recreation Reuse
1. Based on the identified reuse potentials, make
recommendations for developing integrated reuse
programs that would use subregional or regional
plant effluent during the period from 1977 through the
year 2000.
2. Estimate the capital and O&M costs for transport
systems and combine these with the capital and O&M
costs at the reuse sites to arrive at a total
estimate of costs per acre-foot of effluent reused.
3. Define the net change in emissions of TDS, nutrients,
BOD, flow, etc., reaching the ultimate receiving
water from each reuse area.
F. Conclusions and Recommendations Regarding Effluent Reuse
in the CSDOC Wastewater Management Program
1. Based on the cost-effective analysis of the effluent
.reuse options, arrive at tentdtive conclu$ions
regarding feasibil~ty and need for implementation of
additional effluent reuse in the CSDOC regional
program.
2. Discuss the flexibility of the regional plant
effluent disposal system to meet effluent reuse
demands as they arise in the future.
CJ)
Q) ·-w
'[)
0
CJ)
V) <
Planning & Engineering Consult<.mts J.13. GillJcrt ::J
'
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
r-"
~vdJECT:Projected EIS Schedule DATE: March 3, 1976
FRmt: Fred Krieger-
TO: Orange County Environmental Impact Statement File . . . . .. . .. .,..,., ... " ..
Tasks Task Completion Date
(-
l"'
3"
Preliminary
Draft Facil.i ties
Plan
First Preliminary
Draft EIS
(All chapters)
EPA Branch Review
(All chapters)
4 .. / · Consultant revision
(submit second
preliminary draft)
s~ EPA Division Review
Advisory Co~mittee
Review
6~ Consultant revision
(submit final draft)
7~ EPA Review and Signa-
ture change
8, Draft printing and
distribution
(Mailing to CEQ)
9~ .Public Notice for
Public Hearing
10, Public Hearing
11~ Final EIS published
EPA Form 1'.l20-6 (Re.,, 6-72)
5/7/76
6/4/76
7/2/76
7/23/76
.8/13/7 6
9/10/76
9/13/76
10/19/76
/7JP
-?.:-j-r-/7 7
Elapsed Time
. ~·
6 weeks
5 weeks
4 weeks
4 weeks
3 weeks
3 weeks
4 weeks
3 days
5 weeks
3 ,months
• I
COUNTY SANIT~A. TION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
Mr. Paul DeFalco, Jr.
Regional Administrator
May 13, 1976
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region IX
100 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Dear Mr. DeFalco:
Our Boards of Directors are very concerned that EPA finds
it necessary to expand the scope of the Environmental Impact
Statement for the Facilities Plan of the Districts by 150%.
In March, 1975, our Directors authorized the engagement of
TELCPHON ES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
J. B. Gilbert and Associates to prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement for an amount not to exceed $60,000. In
recent discussions on April 27th with State and EPA repre-
sentatives, the scope of the Environmental Impact Statement
was expanded involving additional work for the EIS consultant
and we have been asked to increase the maximum agreed-upon
amount from $60,000 to $150,000 plus printing expenses not
to exceed $35,000.
Our Directors wish to voice their objection to both EPA and
the State concerning thls new requirement. Specifically, it
is our opinion that EPA has now made unnecessary major changes
in the scope of the project over-all which will prove of
minimal value. Additionally, the time delay necessary to pre-
pare the expanded version of the Environmental Impact Statement
will produce considerable extra costs and result in a dis-
ruption of the rigid schedule established by EPA, the State,
and our Districts.
It is the opinion of the Directors that the additional costs
of $90,000, together with the quantity and quality of the
printed report, is grossly excessive. It is the request of
the Directors that EPA and the State reconsider the necessity
of the current request to extend the scope of work on the
proposed EIR/EIS.
I
~, ,
Mr. Paul DeFalco, Jr.
May 13, 1976
Page 2.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
In the event you or representatives of your office would
care to meet with myself or the Directors and staff of the
Districts, we will be most happy to schedule a meeting at
your convenience.
Very truly yours,
,~0~ L-c)~~
Donald E. Winn
Joint Chairman
Richard Coddington, EPA Region IX
Larry W. Walker, SWRCB
Fred Krieger, EPA Region IX
Robert Gillette, SWRCB
EXHIBIT "A"
(Revised)
AGENDA ITEM #12(A)
Designated Positions Categories
1. Directors I, II, III
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
General Manager I, II, III
Director of Finance and I, II, III
Board Secretary
Chief Engineer I, II, III
Superintendent I, II, III
General Counsel I, II, III
Consultants* I, II, III
Supervisory Personnel as set forth I, II, III
in Districts' salary resolution,
as amended
Lead Storeskeeper I, II, III
* The word "consultant" is defined in .Section 1. 5 (b). A position
nominally known as a consultant to the District is not a
designated position herein unless such definition is satisfied.
Thus, a "financial consultant", an "engineering consultant" and
a "bond counsel" in many instances will not be a consultant
herein. Determinations hereunder shall be made by the govern-
ing body of the District.
.
·DISTRICTS 2,3,5,6 & 7
ITEMS 0~
SUPP LEMENTAL AGENDJI.. (3) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the
following cities regarding elections of mayors and appointment of
alternates, and seating new membeis of the Boards: (*Mayor)
City
Anaheim
Cypress
Newport Beach
Placentia
Stanton
Villa Park
District(s)
2 & 3
3
s
s
6
7
2
3
2
Active
Miriam Kaywood
Alice J. MacLain*
Howard Rogers*
Donald Mclnnis
Paul Rycoff
Pete Barrett
Donald A. Holts, Jr.
Martha V. Weishaupt*
Donald Winn
Alternate
W. J. Thom*
Otto Lacayo
Ray Williams
Howard Rogers*
Howard Rogers*
George F. DeJesus*
Harry L. Miller
Harry F. Tipton*
•
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts
ol Orange County, Calilornia
JOINT BOARDS
MEETING DATE
MAY 12J 1976 -7:30 P.M.
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
THE JOINT CHAIRMAN HAS REQUESTED THAT ANY DIRECTOR
WITH A QUESTION ON CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS OR ANY
OTHER AGENDA ITEM PLEASE CONTACT THE MANAGER OR
APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
PRIOR TO THE MEETING,
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll Call
(3) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts re seating of
new Directors. See supplemental agenda
(4) EACH DISTRICT
Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings,
as mailed:
...
District 1 April 14, 1976 regular, and ,,
April 21, 1976 adjourned . ~ )
District 2 April 14, 1976, regular .f' ~/ kf ,·
District 3 April 14, 1976, regular ,tt t-l '..•. .,
District 5 April 14, 1976, regular_ I . , -
,, ( {ll' ~-r
District 6 April 14, 1976, regular /'.•" '. ,._,~ 0
l~-fv"-at
District 7 -April 14, 1976, regular
District 11 -April 14, 1976, regular :----...... 'Y'. .;,A' .
(5) EACH DISTRICT
Annual election of Chairmen and Chairmen pro tern of the Boards ,.
(a) District 1 ~c7t. l
·~LB""".,~ ... --
w(i~ !...:
(b) District 2 :cft-. J.. /
u}" __ , ) li·i4d-,J (c) District 3
) .·,.
(d) District 5 1'>1! l ·t . ~di.t<-6 ~ I
(e) District 6 ~--~: •. _,r,~
%~ '.: ~. ) J-
(f) District 7 I . · i I I , I ";aJr. 1
· · ..
( . . ,
(g) District 11
(6) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary
(7) ALL DISTRICTS
Reports of:
{a) Joint Chairman
{b) General Manager,
{c) General Counsel
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vot~ motion ratifying payment, of claims
ROLL CALL VOT£ ........ ._ ..... of the joint and individual Districts as follows {Each Director shall
be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each
District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote
differently for any District):
JOINT OPERATING FUND See page{s) "A" and "D"
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page{s) "A" and "D"
DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE
DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B" and "E"
DISTRICT NO. 3 See page{s) "B" and "E"
DISTRICT NO. 5 See page(s) "E"
DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE
DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) "C" and "F"
DISTRICT NO. 11 See page(s) "C"
(9) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR
Roll Cati Vote or Cast
Unanimous Ballot
ITEMS NOS. 9 (A) THROUGH 9 ( 0 )
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered
as not requiring discussion or further explanation and
unless any particular item is requested to be removed from
the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member
of the public in attendance, there will be no separate
discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar
will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the
consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar
shall be considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the
consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from
the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing
on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same.
-2-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for New Water Well No. 1 at Plant
No. 1, Job No. PW-049, granting a time extension of 45
calendar days to the contract with McCalla Bros. in order
to allow McCalla Bros. to complete an emergency commitment
to the Southern California Water Company. See page "G"
(b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Rehabilitation of Rothrock Outfall
Pumping Station, Plant No. 2, Huntington Beach, California,
Specification No. E-079
(c) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-83, to receive and file bid
tabulation and recommendation, and ·awarding purchase contract
for one new, dual fuel, gas engine for Rehabilitation of
Rothrock Outfall Pumping Station, Plant No. 2, Huntington Beach
California, Specification No. E-079, to Waukesha Engine
Servicenter, Inc., in the amount 9f $76,318.00 including tax and
freight. See pages "H" and "I"
(d) Consideration of motion ratifying attendance of Joint Chairman
Don Winn at a meeting with members of the State Water Resources
Control Board in connection with the proposed Committee of
Locally Elected Officials in Sacramento on February 18, 1976; and
ratifying attendance of Director Frances Wood at the National
Association of Regional Councils Water Quality Workshop relative
to 208 Planning, in Burlingame, California, on May 5, 6 and 7,
1976, and authorizing compensation and reimbursement of expenses
in accordance with existing policies
(e) Consideration of Public Employees Retirement System standard
Resolution No. 76-84, approving amendment to Retirement System
contract to depool from the State funding pool, and providing
one-year final compensation basis for retirement benefits
(Finalizes the Boards' declaration of intent on April 14, 1976,
Resolution No. 76-62.)
DISTRICTS 1 & 7
(f) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal
of Boyle Engineering Corporation, dated May 5, 1976, for
preparation of plans and specifications for Raitt Street Trunk
Sewer, for a lump sum fee of $ 65, 900. 00. See page "J"
DISTRICT 2
(g) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from
G. L. Lewis Company for annexation of approximately 26.382 acres
of territory to the District in the vicinity easterly of Mesa
Drive and Loma Street, and refer._to. staff. for study. and
recommendation (Proposed Annexation No. 15 -Tract No. 8885 to
County Sanitation District No. 2). See page "K"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
DISTRICT 3
(h) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from
County of Los Angeles, Department of County Engineer,
dated April 26, 1976, requesting consideration of possible
sewage capacity in the District's system for the La Habra
Heights area, and refer to staff for study and recommendation
See page · "L"
(i) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice
submitted by Ray E. Molina, in the amount of $585.00,
against A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Co., contractor
for the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 7, Contract
No. 3-20-2
DISTRICT 5
(j) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-85-5, approving new Standard
Agreement for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges with the
City of Newport Beach, canceling similar agreement dated
September 15, 1972, and rescinding previous minute action re
payment of fees for such services. See page "M"
DISTRICT 7
(k) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-86-7, ordering
annexation of approximately 23.481 acres to the District in
the vicinity of Skyline Drive and Plantero Drive (Proposed
Annexation No. 42 -Tract No. 8640 to County Sanitation District
No. 7)
(1) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-87-7, ordering annexation
of approximately 62.64 acres to the District in the vicinity
of the northeast corner of Orange Park Acres and Chapman Avenue
(Proposed Annexation No. 46 -Tracts Nos. 8799 and 8827 to
County Sanitation District No. 7). See page "N"
(m) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-88-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 22 acres of
territory to the District in the vicinity of Chapman Avenue and
the proposed extension of Crawford Canyon Road (Proposed Annexation
No. 54 -Tract No. 8745 to County Sanitation District No. 7)
DISTRICT 11
(n) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the
plans and specifications to Remodel Newland-Hamilton Pumping
Station Facilities, Contract No. ll-4R, authorizing an adjustment
of engineer's quantities and a total addition of $157.31 to
to contract with Clifford L. Thompson Construction Company,
for additional block wall, and granting a time extension of
66 calendar days due to difficulty in obtaining required
materials as specified.-See page "0"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5)
-4-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4)
DISTRICT 11 (Continued)
(o) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-89-11, accepting Contract
No. ll-4R, Remodel Newland-Hamilton Pumping Station Facilities,
as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion;
and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "P"
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
-5-
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Report of Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive
and file the Committee's written report
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive
Committee:
(a) Consideration of actions relative to adoption of proposed
Conflict of Interest Code:
(1)
(2)
Consideration of motion to receive and file letter
from Districts' General Counsel, dated April 29, 1976,
re adoption of Conflict of Interest Code. See page "Q"
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Unanimous Ballot
Consideration of Resolution No. 76-90, setting June 9, 1976,
at 7:30 p.m. at the Districts' administrative office as the
time and place of hearing on a proposed Conflict of Interest
Code, and directing the Secretary to give notice thereof.
See page "R"
(b) Consideration of actions relative to request of Garden Grove
Sanitary District for waiver of connection fees on Ranchero
~ Way and Ranchero Place:
/
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file General
Counsel's opinion, dated May 5, 1976, relative to request
of Garden Grove Sanitary District for waiver of connection
fees. See page "S"
(2) Consideration of motion to respectfully deny request of
Garden Grove Sanitary District for waiver of connection
fees to serve 21 homes constructed in Garden Grove on
Ranchero Way and Ranchero Place based upon opinion and
recommendation of the General Counsel
(c) Consideration of actions relative to amendment to agreement with
J. B. Gilbert and Associates for preparation of Environmental
Impact Statement:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Environmental
Protection Agency memorandum, dated April 30, 1976, relative
to preparation of Environmental Impact Statement. See
page "T"
(2) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter of
J. B. Gilbert and Associates, dated April 15, 1976, relative
to cost of additional work for preparation of Environmental
Imp~ct Statement. See page "U"
(3) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-92, approving amendment
Roll Call Vote or Cast to agreement with J. B. Gilbert and Associates for preparation
unanimous Ballot of Environmental Impact Statement re Treatment Plant Facilities
{ Plan, providing for an increase for said services on a per diem
1 > oj fee basis from $60,000 to $150,000 plus printing costs not to
f j f') ,f'/( ,/// exceed $ 35, 000, in form approved by the General Counsel, as >J, /" 0, 1 Jf!;' L reques
7
ted
1
by the Env,ir~nmental P}~tec~i:n. ~g~~c~. See page __ ' ~V-: '_' __ _
'-{ 12) Continued on page , , ,O , • ~ ;,
c / ·. ),' 1 , > ' €,.-(.,~; , /' / &.U, L (-6-
..
(12) (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-91, .. authorizing General
Manager and Joint Chairman to designate Directors to represent Roll Call Vote or Cut
Unanimous B~llot the Districts on District business ·, and providing for compensation
and reimbursement of expenses incurred relating thereto. See
page "W"
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
Staff progress report on JPL-ACTS Pilot Plant facility
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(14)
ITEMS ON
SUPPLEMENTAl AGENDA
Consideration of motion authorizing General Manager to designate one
staff member to travel to Liberal, Kansas, to inspect and supervise
loading of two used, dual fuel, gas engines purchased pursuant to
Board authority on April 14, 1976; and authorizing reimbursement for
travel, meals, lodging and incidental exp enses incurred
(1.5) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(16) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn 'f '.'YV
(17) DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(18) DISTRICT 2
(19)
(19)
IT EMS ON
SUPPLEM ENTAl AG ENDA
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
Consideration of motion to adjourn f:r7
DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
Cons i deration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Carol Ann
Me s tas,· date d April 19, 1976, in the am otint of $810.39 , in conn e ction
with construction of the Knott Int e rceptor, a Portion of Reach 7,
Contract No. 3-20-2, and refer to the contractor and Di s trict's
liability ins ura nce carrier for appropriate action
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn q )f
DISTRiCT 5
Other business a nd communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn 1; I ~
DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(24) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn tj
1
~
-7-
(25) DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(26) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn.¥-~/
(27) DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(28) DISTRICT 11 CJ,..,t' (. 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7: 00 p. m. f-May-24·, 1976, at City
of Huntington Beach Council Chambers c, '.':-.
r
-8-
\
1
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OR ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX Bl 27, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
NOTICE TO THE EXECUTIVE COM:MITTEE
./ Don Winn, Chairman
V"'Norma B. Gibbs, Vice Chairman
~ Y.erm Rima
V-Phillip Cox
V" John Garthe
v-Supv. Laurence J. Schmit
April 29, 1976
Re: Committee Meeting May 4, 1976 -5:30 p.m.
Chairman Winn has asked us to advise you that there will be
a meeting of the Executive Committee at the above hour and
date in the Districts' offices. A brief report on items to
be discussed is attached.
The meeting is scheduled to begin at 5:30 p.m., and dinher
will be served at 6:30 p.m.
Enclosures
I
)
dCl, -Xa~
Fred A. Harper ·
General Manager
cc: Directors ~lar.. Dostal and ~ernon Evans
Tom Woodruff, General Counsel
)
TELE PH ON ES:
AREA CODE 714
540-291 D
962-2411
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0 . BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
April 29, 1976
MANAGER'S REPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: May 4, 1976 -5:30 p.m.
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
Chairman Winn has called this meeting for 5:30 p.m. Directors
Milan Dostal and Vernon Evans have been invited to attend and
participate in the discussions.
1. Treatment Plant Capital Outlay Budget for 1976-77.
The staff is in the process of preparing budget recommendations .
for the 76/77 Joint Operating and Joint Construction budgets. They
will be considered by the Executive Committee in the latter part of
May. With the recent acceleration of the State and Federal grant
program, our long-range cash-flow projections for the joint works
construction program are no longer valid. In fact, we project that
it will be necessary to i ncrease the Districts' tax contribution to
the Capital Outlay Revo lving Fund budget from $2.5 million per year
to $6 million per year for the next three to five years. We have
anticipated some of this increase and reserves have been set up in
the individual Districts ' Accumulated Cap ita l Outlay funds. How-
ever, at least three of the Districts will have difficulty making
their contributions without rescheduling District projects or
seeking new revenues.
The staff will be prepared to go into more detail at Tuesday's
meetin g . Attached is a brief explanation of our money needs in
support of an accelerated construction program.
2. Conside ration of a Conflict of Interest Code.
The General Counsel is recommending the adoption of the enclosed
Conflict of Interest Code which has been developed by the California
Association of Sanitation Agencies Attorneys' Committee to comply
with the requirements of Chapter 7, Title 9 of the Government Code.
Enclosed is a separate re port from Mr. Woodruff.
It is the staff's recommendati on that all personnel in ma nage-
ment and supervisory classifications be required to file in accordance
with the Code.
3. Request of the Gard en Grove Sanitary District for Waiver
of Conne ction Fees.
At the March 30th meeting of the Executive Committee, considera-
tion was given to a request from the Garden Grove Sanitar y District
'l '
for waiver of connection charges for 21 existing homes in a
proposed sewer assessment District. The Committee directed the
staff to obtain information con cerning the .amount of property
taxes paid the Districts for the subject properties. The staff
has determined that something less than $1,000 taxes have been
paid by the subject properti e s since the inception of the
District for operation and maintenance of a sewer system from
which these properties have received no benefit to date.
4 .. Amending Agreement with J. R. Gilbert and Associates
Dated March 26, 1 975.
On March 26, 1975, the Boards authorized the engagement of
J. R. Gilbert and Associates to prepare the Environmental Impact
Statement for the Districts' Facilities Plan. The Environmental
·Impact Stat e ment is being prepared jointly With the Environmental
Protection Agency and funded with 87~% State and Federal Step I
grant funds . In recent discussions with the State and EPA, the
scope of the Environmental I mpact Statement has been expanded at
EPA's insistence involving additional work for the consulting
firm. Attached is a staff explanation of the requi red additional
work and the estimated costs associated with same.
5. Authority to Pay Directors Compensation ·and Per Diem
When Participating in Activities to the Benefit of the Districts .
Presently, the General Manager has the authority ·to designate
members of the Boards and s t aff to attend meetings, conferences,
and other functions within the State of California which will be
of value to the Districts. It is requested that this authority
be extended t o provide when the General Manager requests attendance
by Directors, with the concurrenc.e of the Joint Chairman, that
Directors a ttending will be paid compensation and expense re i m-
bursement pursuant to existing Districts' resolutions establishing
compensation and expense reimbursement policies.
We are requesting this provision to remove any doubt or concern
when a Director is asked to serve or represent the Districts at
a function within the State, that they be assured of allowable
compensati o n and exp ense reimbursement. Currently, the authority rests
with the Bo a rd (s ) and authori z a tion for payment of compensation for
attendance at me etings must either be app roved in advance or re-
quested after the date of participation.
6. Procedures for Obtaining En g ineering Services.
Now that the selection committee has had the benefit of
negotiating eng ineering services in connection with the design of
the 75 mgd Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Plant No. 2,
-2-
Selection Committee members may wish to comment on the procedures
which have been adopted by the Boards. The ~election procedures
became effective February 11th and are to be reviewed for modifi-
cations sometime between August and October.
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
-3-
MEMORANDUM
April 29, 1976
TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager
FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
SUBJECT: Capital Outlay Revolving Fund, Fiscal Year 1976-77
In March of 1974 the Districts forwarded to the State Water Resources Control
Board and EPA a project report for improved treatment of Plant No. 2. This
project report called for an expenditure of $275 million to meet the State and
Federal requirements for ocean discharge.
Based upon this report and the needs surveys for treatment facilities required
to meet the discharge requirements, the Districts facilities have been included
in the project list as adopted by the State B~ard and as approved by the EPA
for the following projects:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
75 MGD of secondary treatment at Plant No. 2
24 MGD expansion of premary treatment at Plant No. 2
Phase 2 expansion of primary flows at Plants Nos. 1 & 2
Secondary treatment of Plants Nos. 1 & 2
Expansion in improved treatment including headworks
addition at Plant No. 1
Expansion and improvement of secondary treatment at
Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Phase 2
Total
$. 73,800,000
4,400,000
24,400,000
36,900,000
125,000,000
125,000,000
$389, 500, 000
Although the project list as approved by the State may not represent the true
project cost, it does indicate an extreme high level of construction activities
for the joint works facilities.
The Board has recently approved the design effort for 75 MGD of improved treatment
at Plant No. 2 which the estimated construction cost is approximately $61~ million.
The State has requested that we analyse our cash flow situation in order that we
might consider the commencing of the design of an additional SO MGD a day of
improved treatment at Plant No. 2 in August of this year pending the results of the
Fred A. Harper
April 29, 1976
Page Two
JPL-ACTS Process Pilot Plant effort. It is estimated that this second phase
of improved treatment at Plant No. 2 will be approximately $50 million. The
State as well as the EPA is most anxious to obligate grant construction funding
before the September 30, 1977 deadline in order that the State of California
does not lose its allocation as provided by the Congress 1972 amendment to the
Clean Water Act. If the Districts are to proceed to meet the NPDES discharge
requirements and to contract for pver $100 million in the summer of 1977, the
CORF budget must be increased considerably over what has been experienced in
the past few years. 'Ibe past CORF budgest adopted by the Boards raised by
taxes are as follows:
1968-69
1969-70
1970-71
1971-72
1972-73
1973-74
1974-75
$4,180,000
3,800,000
3,800,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
2,500,000
2,500,000
It is estimated that the CORF budget for the 1976-77 fiscal year will be
approximately $6,000,000. It is suggested that the staff present the capital
expenditure program to the Executive Committee at their scheduled meeting of
May 4th in order that they may apprise the Joint Board as to the level of
effort involved with meeting the clean water bond laws of the State and EPA.
REL:ss
RICHARO 0. FRAZEE
STEPHEN C.STEWART
TMOMAS L. WOOORUFI"
.JEFFREY A. HARTMAN
LAW OF'F'ICES
Stewdrt,. \f ooclruff & frdzce
1055 NORTH MAIN STREET, SUITE 1020
SANTA ANA, CALI F'ORNIA 92701
April 29, 1976
Boards of Directors .
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
P. o. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject: Adoption of Conflict of Interests Code
AREA cooe: ?14
835-15212
As each of you has been made aware, the provisions of the Political
Reform Act of 1974 (Proposition 9) are now being implemented and
specifically require all local public agencies to adopt a conflict
of interest code that will apply to its officers and employees.
On behalf of the County Sanitation Districts, the code will be
adopted by the Board of Directors of each District and will be
submitted to the Orange County Board of Supervisors for their
review and approval. The Board of Supervisors has established
the date of August 1, 1976 as the final date for submission of
the District's code.
The Executive Committee is being requested to review the draft
of the code which is the basis upon which the specific code will
be submitted to the full Boards at the meeting of June. This
draft code is the product of the Attorneys Committee for the
California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) and, in
my opinion, is the best product of efforts to have a comprehen-
sive yet simplified set of rules. It is considerably more
specific than the model code proposed by the League of California
Cities and, while a few paragraphs will need to be changed to
more precisely identify the factual situation with our Districts,
the su~stance is basically being recommended by my office.
It now appears that the code will be made to apply to the super-
visory category employees of the District, in view of the fact
that they generally have the ability to make or participate in
the making of decisions which could foreseeably have a material
effect on a financial interest of the person holding their
position. Additionally, a few other categories will necessarily
COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM No. 2
Boards of Directors
April 29, 1976
Page Two
have to be included because of the particular responsibilities
of the jobsmeeting the same criteria.
It is also being recommended that the code to be adopted by the
Districts will require the consultants to the Districts, such as
engineering firms and general counsel, be made to comply with all
of its provisions. I do point out, however, that there are some
exceptions, such as a consultant who owns less than a 10% interest
in the firm which is being retained by the District need not
·disclose, on the basis of a minimum involvement.
With regard to the form of the reporting requirements, it is
substantially similar to that presently being required of most
Directors in their capacities as members of the City Councils.
Finally, with respect to the adoption of the code, we are, as
noted above, required to submit our adopted code to the Board
of Supervisors by August 1, 1976. However, the code that will
be submitted to the Board for approval will include my recom-
mendation that it not become effective as a law governing the
officers and employees of the District until January 1, 1977.
This recommendation is based primarily upon the fact that no
effective date is required as a matter of State law and,
secondly, it will avoid one additional filing during 1976
in view of the numerous filings that have already been made
by most Directors. Likewise, the actual filing date is not
yet determined, but at this point it would appear that the
month of April will be selected as the annual anniversary
date. The purpose of this is to coincide with the reporting
dates that the Directors will experience as members of the
City Councils and, therefore, will prevent an unnecessary
amount of duplicate efforts spread through several months
of the year.
~:::ft~·
General Counsel
TLW:·ab
I I
WJML:SSW:ra 1/21/76
Rev. 2/ 2/76
CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
OF THE
------~--------------------------
DISTRICT
ARTICLE !--GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 1.1. Authority. This Code is adopted pursuant to,
'
-and in implementation of, Article 3 (commencing with Section 87300)
of Chapter 7 ,. Title 9 of the Government Code of the State of
California.
Section 1.2. Effect. This Code isin addition to State
and local laws pertaining to conflicts ·of interest of District
officers and employees and is not intended to abridge or otherwise
modify such laws.
Section 1.3. Severability. If any article~ section, subsec-
tion, paragraph, subparagraph, sentence •. clause or phrase of this
Code is for any reason held to be invalid, unconstitutional or
Unenforceable, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
r~maining portions of this Code. The District declares that it
would have adopted this Code and each article, section, subsection,
·paragraph, subparagraph, sentence, clause and phrase thereof
irr.espective of the fact any one or more of such portions of this
Code be declared invalid, unconstitutional or unenforceable.
Section 1. 4. Effective Date. · This Code $hal 1 take effect
upon its approval by the Board of Supervisors of the County.
Section l.5. Definitions. As used in this Code, unless
the context otherwise clearly implies, the following words and
terms shall have the meanings set forth herein.
(a) Business ent!_!y. "Business entity" means any
organization or enterprise operated for .profit, ~ncluding but not
limited to a proprietorship, partnership, firm, business trust,
joint venture, syndicate, "corporation or association.
(b) Consultant. "Consultant" means a p~sition established
by contract with the District pursuant to which contract information,
advice, recommendation or counsel is provided to the District;
provided, however, that "consultant" shall not include a position
in which the person providing such information, advice, recommend-
ation or counsel:
(1) conducts research· and arrives at conclu-
sions with ·respect to his or her rendition of information,
advice, reconnnendation or counsel independent of the control
and direction of the District or of any District official,
other than normal contract monitoring; and
(2) possesses no authority with respect to
any Dis_trict decision beyond the rendition of information,
advice, reconnnendation or counsel. ·
(c) County. "County'.' means the county in whic;h this
District is located.
(d) . Designated employee. "Designated employee" means
a natural person holding, or representing a business entity which
h~lds, a designated position.
(e) Designated position. "Designated position" means
a position within the District specified in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto. Designated positions are deemed to involve the making or
participation in the making of decisions which may foreseeably have
a material effect on a financial interest of the designated employee
holding such position.
(£) Disclosure statements. "Disclosure statements"
mean statements disclosing reportable interests required, by
Section 2 .1, to be filed by designated employees.
(g) District. "District" means this District.
(h) Reportable interests. "Reportab~e interests"
mean investments, interests in real property and income required
to be disclosed by designated employees. "Reportable interests"
-2-
' l
( i
as to any particular designated employee means those. categories
of such interests assigned, by Exhibit "A" attached hereto, to the
designated position held by such employee. "Reportable interests' as
to any particular employee are deemed by said assignment to be
affected foreseeably and materially by any decision made or parti-
cipated in by the designated employee by virtue of his or her
position.
(i) Secretary. "Secreta.ry:~ means that officer of
this District responsible for Di~trict fi1es and records.
ARTICLE !!--DISCLOSURE
Section 2.1. Disclosure Statements. Each designated·
employee .shall file an initial statement and annual statements
disclosing those reportable interests in the category or categories
of reporta~le interests, more particularly described in Section 2.5,
which are assigned by Exhibit "A" hereof to the designated position
·held by such CI:lployee. In the event a designated employee does not
have any such reportable interests, such statements n~ed not be
fil~d. Such statements shall be filed at the place specifi~d in
Section 2.2 and at the times specified. in Section ·2.3 and Section
2.4, shall contain the information specified in Section 2 .. 6 through
Section 2.8, and shall be in the form specified in Section 2.9.
S.ection 2. 2. Place of Filing. Disclosure statements
shall be filed, ~n the original, with th_e. Secretary., who shall
receive such statements on behalf of the District. The Secretary
shall make and retain a copy of each disclosure statement so
filed and shall forward the original thereof to the Board of
Supervisors of the County.
Section 2.3. Time of Filing Initial Statements. (a) In
General. Each designated employee havin~ reportable interests shall
file an initial disclosure statement within thirty· (30) days after
the effective date of this Code .
.. 3_
(b) Civil Service Employees. Each civil service
employee who assumes a designated position· more than thirty (30)
days after the effective date of the Cod~ and who has reportable
interests at the time of assuming· such position shall file an
initial disclosure statement within thirty (30) days after assuming
such position.
(c) Other Employees. Each employee who is not a
civil service employee, who assumes a designated position more
.~ban thirty (30) days after the effective date of this Code, and
.~.. who has reportable interests at the time of assuming such position
.shall file an initial disclosure statement not less than ten (10)
days before assuming such position, unless an earlier assumption
of such position is required, in which event, the initial disclosure
.statement shall be filed within 30 days of assuming the designated
position.
Section 2.4. Time of Filing Annual· Statements. An annual
-Oisclosure statement shall be filed in the month of February of
each year by each designated employee who acquired, received or held a
reportable interest during the preceding calendar.year whether or
.·not such reportable interest was disposed of during such calendar
year and whether or not the designated employee ·filed an initial
0Statement pursuant to Section 2. 3.
Section 2.5. Categories of Repo~table Interests. Reportable
·interests are divided into the following categories:
(a) Category I: Interests in· Real Property. Interests
in real property are reportable interests if:
(1) the real property to.which the interest
.-pertains is located in part or in whole, (A) within the boundaries
of the ·District, (B) within two miles of the boundaries of the
District, .or (C) within two miles ~f land located outside-of the
boundaries of the District which is owned or used by the District;
(2) the fair market value of the interest of the
designated employee or his or her spouse is greater than One Thousand
-4-
I '
Dollars ($1,000); and
(3) the interest is either: (A) a leasehold,
beneficial or ownership interest held by the designated employee
or his or her spouse, (B) an option held. by the designated employee
or his or her spouse to acquire such an interest,· or (C) an interest
or option held by a business entity or ~rust in which the designated
. employee or his or her spouse owns directly, indirectly or benefi-
cially, a ten ·percent (10%) interes~ or greater;·provided, however,
that~in the event that the ownership interest of the designated
employee or his or her spouse in such business entity or trust is
less than fifty percent (50%). the value, for the purpose of para-
graph (2), of the real property interest or .option relates to the
value of the pro rata share of the designated employee o~ his or
her spouse in the real property interest or option held by the
business ·entity or trust; and provided further, that in the event
that the ownership interest of the designated employee or his or
her spouse in such business entity or trust is fifty percent (50%)
or.more, the value, for the purpose of paragraph (2), of the real
property interest or option relates to the entire·value of the real
property interest or option held by the business entity or trust.
(b) Category II: Investments. Investments in business.
entities are reportable if:
(1) the business entity, including parent corpora-
tions, subsidiary corporations or otherwise related business
entities, (A) has an interest in real property located in part or
in whole within the boundaries of the District, within two miles
thereof or within two miles of land. owned or used by the District,
(B) does business or plans to do business within the District, or
(C) has done business within the District at any time .during the
~o years.prior to the time that the disclosure statement-of the
designated employee is filed;
(2) the fair market value of the investment of
-5-
the designated employee or his or her spouse is greater.than One
Thousand Dollars ($1,000); and
(3) ~he investment either (A) is held by the desig-
nated employee or his or her spouse and constitutes a financial
interest in, or securit~ issued by, the business entity, including
but not limited to common stock, preferred s.tock, rights, warrants,
options, debt instruments and any part~ership or other ownership
interest; or (B) is held by any .business entity or trust in which the
designated employee or his or her spouse owns, directly, indirectly
or beneficially, a ten percent (10%) interest or greater, and con-
stitutes a financial interest in, or security· issued by, a business
entity qualifying under paragraph (2) above, provided, however,
that in the event that the ownership interest of the designated
employee or his or her spouse in su~h business entity or trust is
less than fifty percent (50%), the value, for th~ purpose of·
paragraph (2), of the investment relates to the value of the pro
rata share of the designated employee or his or her spouse in the
investment held by the busi~ess entity or trust; and provided
further, that in the event that the ownership intere.st of ~he desig-
nated employee or his or her spouse in such business entity or
trust is fifty percent (50%) or more,· the value, for the purpose of
paragraph (2), of the investment relates to the entire value of the
investment held by_the business entity or trust.
An investment is not ~eportable if it constitutes ·
a time or demand deposit in a financial institution, a share in a
credit union, an insurance policy, or a bond or other debt instru-
ment issued by any government or government agency.
(c) Category III: Sources of Income. Sources of income
are reportable if:
(1) the source of income was eit~er (A) a business
entity located o~ doing business as described in subsection (b) (1)
(B) an individual residing.within the District, or (C) a non-profit
-6-
..
association or corporation having its principal place of business
within the District;
(2) either (A) the aggregate amount of income
received by the designated employee or his or her spouse from the
source during the period covered by the disclosure· statement was
Two Hundred Fifty Dollars" ($250) or more in value, or (B) if the
income was a gift received by the· designated employee or his or her
spouse from the source during the pe~iod covered by the disclosure
statment, the value of the gift was Twenty-Five Dollars ($25) or
more; and
(3) the income was either received by (A) the
designated employee or his or her spouse, o~ (B) received by any
business entity or trust in which the designated.employee or his
or her spouse owns, directly, indirectly or beneficially, a ten
percent (10%) interest or greater, provided, however, that in the
event that the income is received by a business entity described
in this paragraph (B), the valu~, for the purpose of paragraph (2),
of the income relates to the pro rata share of the designated
employee or his or her spouse in the income of the business entity
or trust.·
Income includes, except to the ~xtent excluded by
this subsection, income of any nature from any source, including
but not limited to any salary, wage, advance, payment, dividend,
interest, rent, capital gain, return of capital, gift (including
any gift of food or beverage), loan, forgiveness or payment of
indebtedness, discount in the price of anything of value unless
the discount is available to members of.the public without regard
to official status, rebate, reimbursemen~ of expenses, per diem,
or con~ribution to an insurance or pension program pa~d by any
person other than an employer.
Income does not include: (1) campaign contributions ~
required to be reported under Chapter 4 (commencing with Section
84100) of Titl~ 9 of the Government·Code; (2) salary and reimburse-
-7-
ment for expenses or per diem received from a state or local govern-
ment agency and reimbursement for travel expenses and per diem
received from a bona fide educational, academic or charitable
organization; (3) gifts of informational ~aterial, such as books,.
pamphlets, reports, calendars or periodicals; (4) .gifts which are
not used and which, within thirty days af~er.receipt, are returned
to.the donor or delivered to a charita~le organization without
being claimed as a charitable contribution for tax purposes;
(5) gifts from an individual's ·spous·e, ·child, parent, grandparent,
grandchild, brother, sister,.parent-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-
in-law, aunt, uncle, or first cousin or the spouse of any such
person; provided that a gift from any such person shall.be considered
income if the donor is acting as an agent or intermediary for any
person not covered by this paragrap~ (5); (6) any devise or inheri-
tance; (7) interest, dividends or premiums on a time or demand
deposit in a financial in~titution, shares in a credit union or any
insurance policy, payments received under any insurance policy, or
any hond or other debt instrument issued by any government or
government agency; and (8) dividends, in~erest or any othe~ return
on a security which is registered with the Securities and Exchange
GoIImlission of the United States Government.
(d) Category IV: Supply Sources. Category IV includes
investments included. in Category.II in bu~iness entities described
therein, and income included in Categ.o;ry III from business entities
described therein, if such business entities manufacture or sell
supplies, machinery or equipment of the type utilized by the
District:.
(e) Category V: Contractors. Category V includes
investments included.in Category II in business entities described
therein, and income included in Category III from.business entities
described therein; if such business entities are contractors or
subcontractors engaged in ~he performance of work or se~vices of
-8-
the type utilized by the District.
(£) Category VI: Financial Institutions. Category
VI includes investments included in Category II in business entities
described thereiri, and income included in Category III from business
entities therein, if such business entities constitute banks, saving
and loan associations, insurance companies, investment companies,
title companies, financial consultants or data processing firms.
Section 2.6. Content of Disclo~ure Statements; Category I.
Disclosure statments required to be ~iled for reportaple interests
specifie~ in Category I shall contain the following information:
(a) The address or other precise location -of the
real property;
(b) A statement of the nature of the interest in
·the real property;
· (c) When the real property is not used principally
as the.residence of the designated employee making the filing, a
statement of whether the fair market value of .the interest exceeds
Ten.Thousand Dollars ($10,000) and whether it exceeds ·one Hundred
Thousand Dollars ($100,000); and
(d) In the case of an interest in real property wholly
or partially acquired during the period covered by an annual disclo-
sure statement, the date of acquisition and, if such interest in
such property was disposed.of during such period, the date of dis-
position.
Section 2.7. Content of Disclosure Statements; Category II
.and Related Categories. Disclosure statements required to be filed
for reportable interests specified in Category II and investments
specified in Categories IV, V and VI shall contain the following
information:
(a) The name and address of the business entity in
which each investment is held;
(b) A general description of the business activity
in which the business entity is engaged;
-9-/
(c) A statement of the nature of the investment;
(d) A statement of whether the fair market value
of ·the investment ·exceeds Ten Thousand Dollars ($10, 000) and
whether it exceeds One Hundred Thousand ~ollars ($100,000); and
(e) In the case of investments wholly or partially
acquired during the period covered by an ~nnual disclosure state-
ment, t~e date of acquisition and, if ~uch interest in such property
was disposed of during such period, the date of disposition.
Sectio~ 2.8. Content of Disclosure Statement; Category III
and Related Categories. Except as to an initial disclosure state-
ment for which income sources need not be reported,disclosure
statements required to be filed for reportable interests specified
in Category III and income sources specified in Categories IV, V
and VI shall contain the following ~nformation:
(a) The name and address of each source of income;
(b) A general .description of the business activity,
if any, of each source;
(c) A statement. whether the aggregate value of income
from each source was greater than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000),
and whether it was greater than Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000);
(d) A description of the consideration, if any, for
which the income was received;
(e) In.the case of income con~tituting a gift, the
amount and the date on which the gift ~as received;
(f). In the case of income of a business entity, in
which the designated employee or his or her spouse owns a ten
percent·(l0%) interest or more:
(1) name and address and a general description of
the business activity of the business e:itity;
(2) if such business entity provides legal or
brokerage service·s, the name of every natural person, non-profit
association or corporation· and business entity who paid.fees to
such business entity if the pro rata share of the designated
-10-
employee or his or her spouse of such fees was One Thousand Dollars
($1,000) or more; and
(3) if such business entity does not provide
legal or brokerage services, the name of every natural person,
,non-profit association or corporation, and business .entity from
whom such business entity received payments if the pro rata share
of the designated employee or his or her spouse of gros5 receipts
from such person, non-profit association or corporation, or business
entity was Ten Thousand Dollars ($10'-,000)" or more during any calendar
year partially or wholly covered by the disclosure statement being
filed.
Section 2.9. Form of Disclosure Statements. Disclosure
statements required to be filed hereunder for any category of
·reportable interests shall be substantially in the form set forth
for such category in Exhibit "B" attached hereto.
ARTICLE III--DISQUALIFICATION
Section 3.1. General Rule. Designated employees shall
disqualify themselves from making or participating in the making
of any governmental decision when it is reasonably foreseeable
that a financial interest of the designated employee may be
materially affected by the decision. A designated employee shall
not be required to disqualify himself with respect to any matter
which could not be legally.acted upon or .decided without his
participation.
Section 3.2. Making Governmental Decisions; Actions Included.
A designated employee makes a governrnenta~ decision within the
meaning of this Article, when he or she, acting within the authority
of his or her position:
(a) Votes on a matter;
(b) Appoints_a person;
(c) Obligates or commits the District to any
course of action;
-11-
. (d) Enters into any contractual agreement on behalf
of the District; or
(e) Determines not to act, within the meaning of
subsection (a) through subsection. (d), unless such determination
is made because of his or her financial interest_.
When the determination not to act occurs because of
his or her financial inte~est, the designated employee's determina-
tion must be accompanied by disclosure of the financial interest
made part of the District's official records, or made in writing
to designated employee's supervisor or appointing power.
Section 3.3. Participating in Decisions; Actions Included.·
A designated employee participates in the making .of a governmental
decision within the meaning of this Article, when he or she, acting
within the authority of his or her position:
(a) Negotiates in any manner with a governmental
entity or private person regar4ing the decision;
(b) Conducts research or investigations regarding
the decision;
(c) Prepares any report, analysis, or opinion regarding
the decision;
(d) Participates in any governmentai discussions or
debates regarding the decision; or
(e) Advises or makes recommendations to the decision-
maker.
Section 3.4. Making or Participating in Decisions; Actions
Excluded. Making or participating in the making of a governmental
decision as used in this Article shall not include:
(a) Actions of a designated employee which are solely
ministerial, secretarial, manual. or cler~cal;
· (b) Appearances by a designated employee as a member
of the general public before an agency in the course of its pre-
scribed governmental function to represe~t himself or herself on
-12-
matters related solely to his or her personal intere.sts; or
(c) Actions by a designated employee relating to
the compensation or the terms or conditions of his or her employ-
ment or contract.
Section 3.5. Financial Interest. A financial interest as
used in this Article means:
(a) A direct or indirect interest in real property
as described in Section 2.5(a) if such interest is worth more
than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000);
(b) A direct or indirect investment as described in
Section 2.5(b) if such investment is worth more than One Thous~nd
Dollars ($1,000);
(c) A source of income as described in Section 2.5(c),
other than a loan by a connnercial lending institution in the
regular course of business, if such income aggregates Two Hundred
Fifty Dollars ($250) or more in value received by or promised to
the designated employee within twelve (12) months prior to the
time when the decision refe.rred to in Section 3 .1 is made; or
(d) A business entity if the designated employee is
a director, officer, partner, trustee or employee or holds any
position of management therein.
For the purpose of this Section, indirect invest~ent
or interest means any investment or interest owned by the spouse
or dependent child of a designated employee, by an agent on behalf
of a designated employee, by any husines.s entity controlled by
the designated employee or by a trust in which he has a sub-stantial
interest. A business entity is controlled by a designated employee
if the designated employee, his agent, spouse and dependent children
hold more than fifty percent (50%) of the ownership interest in the
entity. A designated employee has-· a substantial. ·interest in a
trust when the employee, his spouse and dependent children have a
prPsent or future interest worth more than One Thousand· Dollars
( $1 . l100) .
.1 · ... -
Section 3.6. Affected Materially. (a) Standard of
Determination. The financial effect of a governmental decision
on-a financial interest of .a designated employee is material if,
at the time the designated employee makes or participates in the
making of a decision, irt light of all the circumstances and facts
known at the time of the decision, the de_signated employee knows or
ha~ reason to know that the existence of the financial .interest
might interfere with the designated employee's performance of his
or her duties in an impartial manner.free from bias.
(b) Circumstances to be Considered. In determining
the existence of a mterial effect upon a financial interest, the
designated employee shall consider relevant factors, in-~luding but
not limited to the following:
(1) In the. case of any real property in which
the designated employee has a direct or indirect.interest worth
more than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000): (A) whether the effect
of the decision will be to increase the income-producing potential
of the real property by One Hundred Dollars ($100) or a five percent
(5%) per month, whichever is less; and (B) whether the effect of
the decision will be to increase the fair market value of the real
property by One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) or more or by five percent
(5%). whichever is greater.
(2) In the case. of a business entity in which the
designated employee has a direct or indirect investment worth more
than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000), or in the case of a designated
employee who is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee,
or holds any position of management ina business entity: (A) whether
the effect will be to increase or decrease the annualized gross
revenue of the business entity by one percent (1%) or more or the
annual net income of the business e_ntity by five percent (5%) or
more; and (B) whether the effect of the decision will be to increase
or decrease the assets or liabilities of the business e~tity by
-14-
Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) or more, or by five percent (5%)
of its current assets or liabilities, whichever is less.
(3) In the case of a source of income of a desig-
nated employee (other than a loan by a commercial lending institu-
tion in the regular course of business) aggregating· Two Hundred
Fifty Dollars ($250) or more in value received by or promised to
· the designated employee within twelve (12) months prior to the time
when the decision is made: (A) whether, if the source of income
~·.
is a business entity, the decision will affect such business entity
itr the manner des.cribed in subsection (2) above; (B) ·whether the
governmental decision will directly affect the amount of income to
be received by the designated employee; and -(C) whether there is
a nexus between the governmental decision and the purpose for
which the designated employee receives income.
The specific dollar or percentage amounts set forth
. .
in this subsection do not constitute either absolute maximum or
minimum levels, but are merely intended to provide guidance and
should be considered along with other relevant factors in determining
whether a financial interest may interfere with the designated
employee's exercise of his or her duties in rendering a decision.
(c) Excluded Circumstances. The making or participation
in the making of a governmental decision by a person acting under
contract in the position of consultant or by a person retained
to provide information, advice, reconrrnendation or counsel has no
material financial effect on a business entity or source of income
in which such person acting under contract in the position of
consultant, or person retained to provided information, advice,
recommendation or counsel is an officer, ·employee, sole proprietor
or partner, if the only financial effects of the decision are
the modification, perpetuation or ·renewal of the contractual or
retainer agreement and/or the opportunity to bid competitively
on a project or contract.
-15-
Section 3.7. Notice of Action Tc-.k.en. (a) Mandatory Posting
of Notice of Action Taken. If a designated employee· disqualifies
himself or herself from the making of a decision, or participation
in a decision, upon a particular subject, and if the District
subsequently connnits itself to a definit~ course of action with
regard to said subject, then the Secretary shall post a Notice of
Action Taken as soon as is practicable following such connnitment.
Sai4 Notice shall be substantially fn the form set forth in Exhi-
bit "C" attached hereto and by refer_ence. incorporated herein and
shall be conspicuously posted on· or near the door of .the regular
meeting place of the governing body of the District.
(b) Discretionary Posting of Notice of Action. In
the event that the District commits itself to a definite course of
action with regard to any subject and no disqualification has occurred,
the governing body may direct the District Secretary to post the
Notice described in subsection (a) at the time and place set forth
in said subsection ..
(c) Request for Reconsideration: ·Time of Filing;
Effect of Failure to File. In the event that a Notice has been
posted pursuant to subsections (a) or (b), a written request for
reconsideration or disapproval of any District connnitment on the
ground of existence of a conflict of interest of a designated
employee shall be filed with the District Secretary within thirty
(30) days of the posting of said Notice. In the event that such a
request is not filed, said connnitment and all decis.ion made with
regard thereto shall be final and conclusive.
(d) Reconsideration Upon Filing of Request Therefor.
In the event that a request is filed with the District Secretary
pursuant to subsection (c) hereof, the Secretary shall direct said
request to the District governing body, officer or employee respon-
sible for the District conunitrnent in qu~stion and·said body, officer
or employee shall cause said conunitrnent to be reconsidered.
-16-
.
EXHIBIT "A"
Designated Positions ·categories
1. Directors I, II,. III
2. Manager I, II, III
3. District Engineer I, II, v
4. General Counsel I, II, III
5. Secreta.ry IV
6. Treasurer . VI
7. Purchasing Agent IV
8. Construction Superintendent v
9. Treatment Plant Operator IV
10. Waste Disposal Operator IV
11. Right of Way Agent I
12. Consultants* I, II, III
I
* The word "consultant" is defined in Section 1. S(b). A
position nominally known as a consultant to the District
is not a designated position herein unless such definition
is satisfied. Thus, a "financial consultant", an
"engineering consultant" and a "bond counsel" in many
instances will not be a consultant herein. Determinations
hereunder shall be made by the governing body of the
District.
EXHIBIT "B"
DISTRICT
--~----------------
DISCLOSURE STATE11ENT
CATEGORY !--INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY
PLEASE NOTE: Before completing this statement, read ·section 2.S(a)
of the Conflict of Interest Code of this District.· -Such Section
describes and limits the items required to be disclosed herein.
(Attach additional pages if needed.)
A. Designat~d position=~---------------------------------
B. Name of designated empl9yee:
------------------------------~
C. Address or precise location of each parcel of real property:
Parcel 1:
~----------------------------------
D. Nature of interest in· each parcel of real property (including
whether the interest is held by you, your spouse or a business
entity or trust in which you or your spouse own a ten percen~
interest or more):
E. If the real property does not ·constitute your principal residence,
does the fair market value of such property exceed $10,000?
Parcel 1: Yes No -------
Parcel 2: Yes No ------
Parcel 3: Yes No ------
F.· If the real property does not constitute your principal residence,
does the fair market value--of such property e~ceed $100,000?
Parcel 1,: Yes No
Parcel 2: Yes No
Parcel 3: Yes No ---
-i-
FORM I
G. If this disclosure statement is an annual, rather than an
initial, statement and if the interest in the real property was
wholly or partially acquired during the period covered by the
statement, give the date of acquisition of such interest and
the date of disposition, if any.
Parcel l: Acquisition
Disposition
Parcel 2: Acquisition
Disposition
Parcel 3: Acquisition
Disposition
STATE OF-CALIFORNIA )
) SS
County of _____ )
The undersigned,
·perjury, certifies as follows:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
under penalty of
. That (s)he has used all reasonable diligence in the preparation
of the foregoing Statement and that to the best of (his) (her)
knowledge it is true and complete.
Signature:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
Received by District on , 19
~~~~~~~~~-
-ii-
FORM I
DISTRICT
--------~---~---------
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
CATEGORY !!--INVESTMENTS
PLEASE NOTE: Before completing this statement, read Section 2.S(b)
of the Conflict of Interest Code of this District. Such Section
describes and limits the items required to be disclosed herein.
(Attach additional pages if needed.)
B. Name of designated employee:
~------~---------------------------~-----
c. Name and address of the business entity in which each investment
is held.
D. General description of the business activity in which the business
entity is engaged.
Investment 1:
~----------~-----------------------------------------------
E. Nature of each investment (including whether the investment is
held by you, your spouse, or a business entity or trust in which
you or your spouse own a ten percent interest or more):
Investment 1:
~------------------------------------~---------------------------
F. Does the fair market value of the investment exceed $10,000?
Investment 1:
Investment 2:
Investment 3:
Yes
---Yes
Yes ---
-i-
FORM II
No ---No
No ---
G. Does the fair market value of the investment exceed $100,000?
Investment 1:
Investment 2:
Investment 3:
Yes
---Yes
Yes ---
No ---No
No ---
H. If this disclosure statement is an annual, rather than an
initial, statement and if the investment was wholly or partially
acquired during the period covered by the statement, give the
date of acquisition of such investment and the date of disposi-
tion, if any.
Investment 1: Acquisition Date:
Disposition Date:
Investment 2: Acquisition Date:
Disposition· Date:
Investment 3: Acquisition Date:
Disposition Date:
STATE OF CALIFOR..~IA )
) SS
Co1:ffitY of )
The undersigned,
perjury, certifies as follows:
u~der penalty of
That (s)he has used all reasonable diligence in the preparation
of the foregoing Statement and that to the best of (his) (her)
knowledge it is true and complete.
Dated: 19 . ---------------------
Signature:~------------------------~--------~
Received by District on ~------------~------' 19
-ii-
FORM II
: .. .-···
I
I
. I
!
I
!
DISTRICT -----------------------
DISC I;.. OS URE STATEMENT
CATEGORY III--INCOME
PLEASE NOTE: Before completing this statement, read ·Section 2.S(c)
of the Conrlict of Interest Code of this District. Such Section
describes and limits the items required to be disclosed herein.
(Attach additional pages if needed.)
A. Designated position: --------------------------------------------------
B. Name of designated empl~yee: ________________________________ __
C. Name and address of each source of income:
Source 3: -------------------------------------------------------------------
D. General.description of the busin~ss.activity of e~ch scurce of
income:
Source 1: -----------------------------------------------------------------
E. Was the aggregate value of income from the source greater than
$1,000?
F.
Source 1: Yes
Source 2: Yes
Source 3: ·Yes
Was the aggregate value of income
$10,000?
Source 1:
Source 2:
Source 3:
Yes
---Yes
Yes ---
No
No
No
from the source
No ---No
Ne ---
greater than
G. Describe the co.nsideration, if any, for which the income was
received.
Source 1:
Source 2:
Source: 3:
-----------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
-i-
FORM III
H. Set forth the amount and the date of receipt of each gift.
Gift 1: , 19 ; $ Gift 2:----------, 19-; $---------
Gift 3: , 19= $ ________ _
Complete items I through L below where the income of a business
entity in which you or your spouse own a ten percent interest or
more, is being reported:
I. Name and address of each business entity.
Business Entity 1:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
J. General description of the business activity of each business
entity.
Business Entity 1:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
K. If such business entity which provides legal or brokerage
··services, set forth the name of every natural person, non-profit
association or corporation and business entity who paid fees to
such business entity if you or your spouse's pro rata.share of
such fees was $1,000 or more.
Business Entity 1:
~~--~~--~~--------~--~------~--
L. If such business entity does not provide legal or brokerage
services, set forth the name of every natural person, non-profit
association or corporation, arid business entity from whom such
business entity received payments if you or your spouse's pro
rata share of gross receipts from such person, non-profit
association or corporation, or business entity was -$10,000
-ii-
FORM III
or more during any calendar year partially or wholly covered
by this statement.
Business.Entity!:~~~~--~~----------~~---------~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS
County of )
The undersigned,
perjury, certifies as follows: -so----~~~~~~~~~~~~
, under penalty of
That (s)he has used all reasonable diligence in the preparation
of the foregoing Statement and that to the best of (his) (her)
knowledge it is true and complete.
Received by District on 19
~~~~~~~~~-
By:
_T_i_t_I_e_:~~~~~------~------~
-iii-
FORM III
.~
DISTRICT
--~~~~~--~~~-
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
CATEGORY IV--SUPPLY SOURCES
PLEASE NOTE: Before completing this statement, read Section 2.S(d)
of the Conflict of Interest Code of this District. Such Section
describes and limits the items required to be disclosed herein.
(Attach additional pages if needed.)
•. B. Name of designated employee: ____ .__ ____________________________ ___
C. Name and addr.ess of the business entity in which each investment
is held:
D. General description of the business activity in which the business
entity is engaged:
E. Nature of each investment (including whether the investment is
held by you, your spouse, or a business entity or trust in which
you or your spouse own a ten percent interest or more):
Investment 1: -----------------------------------------------------
F. Does the fair market value of the investment exceed $10,000?
Investment 1: Yes No
Investment 2: Yes No
Investment 3: Yes No
-i-
FORM IV
M. Describe the consideration, if any, for which the income was
received:
Source 1.=-------------------------
Source 2: ________________________ __
Source 3:~------------------------
N. · Set forth the amount and the date of receipt of each gift:
Gift 1: 19 $
Gift 2: 19-; $-------
Gift .3:~~~~~~~~~~-' 19==; $~~~~~~-
Complete items 0 through Q below where the income of a business
entity in which you or your spouse own a ten percent interest or
more:
O. Name and address of each business entity.
Business Entity 1:
-------------------~
Business Entity 2: --------------------
Business Entity 3: ___________________ ~
P. General description of the business activity of each business
entity.
Business Entity 1:
~---------------------~
Business Entity 2:
~------------------~
Business Entity 3: --------------------
Q. Set forth the name of every natural person, non-profit associa-
tion or corporation, and business entity from whom such business
entity received payments if you or your spouse's pro rata share
of gross receipts from such person, non-profit association or
corporation, or business entity was $10,000 or more during any
calendar yea~ partially or wholly covered by this state~ent:
Business Entity 1:
-------------------~
Business Entity 2: -------------------------
-iii-
FORM IV
G. Does the fair market value of the investment exceed $100,000?
Investment 1:
Investment 2:
Investment 3:
Yes
---Yes
Yes ---
No ---No
No ---
H. If this disclosure statement is an annual, rather than an initial,
statement and if the investment was wholly or partially acquired
during the period covered by the statement, give the date of
acquisition of such investment and the date of disposition, if
any.
Investment 1: Date of Acquisition:
Date of Disp~sition:
Investment 2: Date of Acq.uis it ion:
Date of Disposition:
Investment 3: Date of Acquisition:
Date of Disposition:
I. Name and address of each source of income:
Source 1:
Source 2:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
Source 3:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~---~~~~~~~~~~--
J. General description of the business activity of each source of
income:
Source 2:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
Source 3:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
K. Was the aggregate value of income from t!le source greater than
$1,000?
Source 1: Yes No
Source 2: Yes No
Source 3: Yes No
L. Was the aggregate value of income from the source greater than
$10,000?
Source 1: Yes No
Source 2: Yes No
Source 3: Yes No
-ii-
FORM IV
~usiness Entity 3: ___________________ ~--~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS
County of )
The undersigned, -~,,,__ __________ , under penalty of
perjury, certifies as follows:
That (s)he has used all reasonable diligence in the preparation
of the foregoing Statement and that to the best of (his) (her)
knowledge it is true and complete.
Dated:~----------• 19_
Signature:~------------------~
Received by District on , 19 -----------
By: ~T~i-t_l_e_: ________________ ~
-iv-
FORM IV
G. Does the fair market value of the investment exceed $100.0001
Investment 1:
Investment 2:
Investment 3:
Yes
---Yes
Yes ---
No ---No
No ---
H. If this disclosure· statement is an annual, rather than an initial.
statement and if the investment was wholly or partially acquired
during the period covered by the statement, give the date of
acquisition of such investment and the date of disposition, if
any.
Investment 1: Date of Acquisition:
Date of Dispo~ition:
Investment 2: Date of Acquisition:
Date of Disposition:
Investment 3: Date of Acquisition:
Date of Disposition:
I. Name and address of each source of income:
Source 1:
J. General description of the business activity of each source of
income:
Source 3:
~~~--~----~----~--~--~----------~--~--~
K. Was the aggregate value of income from the source greater than
$1,000?
Source 1: Yes No
Source 2: Yes No
Source 3: Yes No
L.· Was the aggregate value of income from the source greater than
$10.000?
Source 1: Yes No
Source 2: Yes No
Source 3: Yes No
.:.11-
FORM V
'rr
DISTRICT ---------------------
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
CATEGORY V--CONTRACTORS
PLEASE NOTE: Before completing this statement, read Section 2.S(e)
of the Conflict of Interest Code of this District. Such Section
describes and limits the items required to be disclosed herein.
(Attach additional pages if needed.)
A. Designated position: -------------------------------------•.
B. Name of de.signated employee: _________________ _
C. Name and address of the business entity in which each investment
is held:
D. General description of the business activity in which the business
entity is engaged:
Investment 1: --------------------------------------
E. Nature of each investment (including whether the investment is
held by you, your spouse, or a business entity or trust in which
you or your spouse own a ten percent interest or more):
Inve.s tmen t 1 : --------------------------------------
F.. Does the fair market value of the _investment exceed $f0, 0001
Investment 1: Yes No
Investment 2: Yes No
Investment 3: Yes No
-i-
FORM V
""'-"'
M. Describe the consideration, if any, for which the income was
received:
Source 1:
Source 2:
Source 3:
N. Set forth the amount and the date of receipt of each gift:
Gift 1: 19 ; $
Gift 2: 19-; $-------
Gift 3:~--~--~~~--~' 19==; $~~~-----
Complete items 0 through Q below where the income of a business
entity in which you or your spouse own a ten percent interest or
more:
0. Name and address of each business entity.
Business Entity 1:
~-----------------------~--~~----~---
P. General description of the business activity of each business
et;itity.
Business Entity l:~------------------~--------------~~-
Business Entity 2=--~----------------------~--~~--~---
Business Entity 3=--------------~~----~--~--------------
Q. Set forth the name of every natural person, non-profit associa-
. tion or corporation, and business entity from whom such busine.ss
entity received payments if you or· your spouse's pro rata share
of gross receipts from such person, non-profit association or
corporation·, or business entity was $10, 000 or more during any
calendar year partial~y or wholly covered by this statement:
Business Entity l: __ .;_, ______________ ~-------~---------------
Business Entity 2=----~--~-------------------------------
-iii-
FORM V
Business Entity 3=---------------------------------------
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS
County of )
The undersigned, -----...-~~--------------~··under penalty of
perjury, certifies as follows:
That (s)he has used all reasonable diligence in the preparation
of the foregoing Statement and that to the best of (his) (her)
knowledge it is true and complete.
19 .
Signature:~--------------------------------~
Received by District on
~------~----------
19 ..
By:
~T-i_t_I_e_:------~------------------
-iv-
FORM ~\
DISTRICT --------------------
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
CATEGORY VI--FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
PLEASE NOTE: Before completing this statement, read Section 2.S(f)
of the Conflict of Interest Code of this District. Such Section
describes and limits the items required to be discl~sed herein.
(Attach additional pages if needed.)
A. Designated position: --------------------_,...------------------------------------------
B. Name of designated employee:
---------------------------------------------------~
C. Name and address of the business entity in which each investment
is held:
D. General description of the business activity in which the business
entity is engaged:
Investment 3: ---------------------------------------------------------------------
E. Nature of each investment (including whether the investment is
held by you, your spouse, or a business entity or trust in which
you or your spouse own a ten percent interest or more):
Investment 1:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Investment 2: ------------------------------------------------------------------
Investment 3: -----------------------------------------------------------------
F. Does the fair market value of the investment exceed $10,000?
Investment 1: Yes No
Investment 2: Yes No
Investment 3: Yes No
-i-
FORM VI
•A
G. Does the fair market value of the investment exceed $100,000?
Investment 1:
investcient 2:
Investment 3:
Yes
---Yes
___ Yes
No ---No
No
H. If this disclosure statement is an annual, rather than ·an initial,
statement and if the investment was wholly or partially acquired
during the period covered by the statement, give the date of
acquisition of such investment and the date of disposition, if
any.
Investment 1: Date of Acquisition:
Date of Disposition:
Investment 2: Date of Acquisition:
Date of Disposition:
~-
Investment 3: Date of Acquisition:
Date of Disposition:
I. Name and address of each source of income:
Source 1:
J; General description of the business activity of each source of
income:
K. Was the aggregate value of income-from the source greater than
$1,000?
Source 1: ·Yes No
Source 2: Yes No
Source 3: Yes No
L. Was.the aggregate value of income from the source greater than.
$10,000?
Source 1: Yes
Source 2: ---Yes
Source 3: ---Yes
-ii-
FORM VI
No
~--No
___ No
M. Describe the considerati_on, if any, for which the income was
received:
N. Set forth the amount and the date of receipt of each gift:
Gift 1: I 19 ; $ Gift 2:~~~~~~~~~~~~, 19~; $~~~~~~~-
Gift 3: , 19=; $ ______ _
Complete items 0 through Q below where the income of a business
entity in which you or your spouse own a ten percent interest or
more:
0. Name and address of each business entity.
·nusiness Entity l:~---~-------------------~--~~--------------
Business Entity 2:
------------------------~-----------------------
Business Entity 3:
~---------~-------~-----~-------------------
Pr General description of the business activity of each business
~ntity.
Q.
Business Entity 1:
--------------------------------~~~---------------
Business Entity 3: ________________________________________ _
Set forth the name of every natural person, non-profit associa-
tion or corporation, and business entity from whom such business
entity received payments if you or your spouse's pro rata share
of gross receipts from such person, non-profit association or
corporation, or business entity was $10,000 or more during any
calendar year partially or wholly covered by .this statement:
Business Entity 1: ________________________________________ _
-iii-
FORM ,VI
Business Entity 3=~-------------------------------------
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS
.County of )
The undersigned,
perjury, certifie~ .as follows: --..--r.,,----------------------, under penalty of
That (s)he has used all reasonable diligence in the preparation of the foregoing Statement and that to the best of (his) (her)
~owledge it is true and complete.
Dated: 19 . ----------------------
Signature:~----------------------------------
Received by District on
~~--------·--------
19 .
By:
=t~i~t~l-e-=--------------------------
-iv-
FORM VI
EXHIBIT "C"
NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the District has ·committed
itself to the following course of action:~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTICE IS.FURTHER GIVEN that in the event that any person
desires the District to reconsider, or disapprove of, said commit-
ment on the ground o~ the existence of a conflict of interest of
a district officer, employee or consultant, a request for said
reconsideration or disapproval shall be submitted to the Secretary
of the District within thirty (30) days .of the date hereof.
By:~~~~~..-----~~~~~~ District Secretary
WJML:
RESOLUTION NO. ---
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
RESOLVED, by th~ Board of Directors of ----------
------..--------District,
C~lifornia, as follows:
1. That that Code entitled "Conflict of Interest Code,
----~--------------~
District", a copy of which
is attached hereto and by r~ference incorporated herein, be, and
is hereby, approved and adopted for the District, subject to the
approval thereof by the Board of Supervisors of the Co~nty of
2·. · · That· the Secretary of this District be, an·a is hereby,
authorized and instructed to submit a copy of such Code to the
Board of Su~ervisors of ~he County.of
request said Board of Supervisors to.approve said Code in accordance
with Government Code Section 87303.
* * * * * . ,•
(Certificate)
_, .. ,,"
SUMMARY OF DISTRICT CONFLICT OF
INTEREST CODE
The basic theory of the Code is that certain positions within
the District are deemed to involve the making or participation in .
making of decisions which could foreseeably have a material effect
on a financial interest of the person holding a position. There-
fore persons holding such positions are required to file certain
disclosure statements disclosing certain interests and, in
addition, are required to disqualify themselves in certain instances
· from making specified decisions.
Article I. This Article contains general provisions includ-
ing definitions. This Article states that a "designated employee"
is that person which hold the position ("designated position")
within the District which requires the making of decisions encom-
passed by the Code.
·"Designated positions" are those listed in column 1 of
~xhibit "A". Such positions are, by the Code, deemed to involve
the making of decisions which could have a material effect on a
financial interest of the employee or officer making the decision.
"Reportable interests" are those interests which designated
employees must report on disclosure statements, and in essence,
constitute those interests of designated employees which could be
affected by decision. ·
This Article also contains a narrow· definition of "consul-
tant". In particula.r a consultant, to be encompassed by the Code
must possess authority with respect to District decisions beyond
· the rendition of advice.
Article II. This Article contains the requirement for disclo-
sure statements. It requires persons holding designated positions
to file an initial disclosure statement with the District Secretary
at the time specified in Section 2.3 and to file annual disclosure
statements at the time specified in Section 2.4. The Secretary is
required to forward all of such statements to the Board of Super-
visors. ·
l>isclosure statements, however, need be filed only if the
·person holding the designated position has "reportable interests".
If such person does not have reportable interests, then he need not
-file disclosure statements.
· ·Reportable interests are, by Section 2.5, divided into six
"categories" and Exhibit "A" assigns different categories to the
various designated positions.
The "categories" are generally summarized as follows:
Category I relates to interests with a value of more than
$1,000 in real property located within or close to the District.
It includes interests held by the designated employee,·his spouse
or by a business entity owned by t~e employee or his spous.e.
. Category II relates to investments with a value of more
than $1,000 in business entities having real property in the District
or doing or planning to do business in the District. It includes
investments held by the designated employee, his spouse or by a
business entity owned by the employee or his spouse.
Category III relates to sources of income aggregating $250
or more or of gifts aggregating $25 or more if the source is
(generally) located within or doine business within the District.
It includes sources of income to the designated employee, his
spouse or a business entity and by the employee or his spouse.
Category IV relates to invest~ents in and income from busi-
ness entities which manufacture or sell supplies or equipment to
the District.
Category V relates to investment·s in and income from
contractors.
Category VI relates to investments in and income from
financial institutions.
The Article describes the. information which is to be
given about each "category" and refers to forms attached to the
Code which are to be completed. For the most part, the informa-
tion required is general in nature.
Article III. This Article contains disqualification
requirements. It requires that persons holding the positions
designated in Exhibit "A" disqualify themselves from making or
participating in making a decision when it is reasonably foresee-
. able that his financial interest may be materially affected by the
decision. The terms "making a decision11
, "participating in the
making of .a decision", "financial interest" and "materially affected"
are defined.
Generaliy, a "financial interest" is the same as an interest
which requires disclosure under Article II and whether an interest
will be "materially affected" in a matter to be determined by the
person concerned, after he considers certain factors.-If he
decides that disqualification is necessary he must accompany the
disqualification by a disclosure of the financial interest made
a part of the District's records or made in writing to the person's
supervisor or appointing power.
This Article also establishes a procedure for reconsideration
of District action where a conflict of interest is alleged to
exist. It requires the District Secretary to post a Notice of
Action Taken whenever any designated employee has disqualified
himself from a decision and the District subsequently corrnnits
itself to a definite course of action with regard to the subject
to which such decision pertains. It authorizes the District
Secretary to post such a Notice in other circumstances.
Whenever a Notice is posted pursuant to the Article, a
request for reconsideration of said District commitment must be
·made within thirty (30) days of the date.of posting of the Notice.
Enforcement. Government Code Section 87300 provides that
any violation ot a local Code is a violation of Chapter 7 of
Proposition (Title) 9. Chapter 11 of Proposition 9 provides the
following penalties for violation of the Law.
. 1. Willful violation is misdemeanor and, in addition to
other misdemeanor penalties, the violator is liable for a fine
equal to the greater of $10,000 or three times the· amount not
properly reported.
-2-
2. Violation is subject to discipline by the·District,
including dismissal.
3. Negligent violation subjects the violator to civil
action for an amount equal to the amount not properly reported
and for an amount up to three times of the amount of economic
benefit.
4. A judicial action to enJoin the v~olation may be brought
and if an official action is taken which ~he court determines might
not otherwise have been taken or approved, the court may set aside
the official action as void ..
-3-·
REFERENCE CHART
Section in Source of Section in Source of
Local Code Section* Local Code Section*
1.1 G 87300 First proviso G 82030
1.2 second sentence
1. 3 Next to last
1.4 G 87303 paragraph G 82030(a)
.1. 5 (a) G.82005 first sentence
1. 5 (b) R 18700(a)(2) Last paragraph G 82030(b)
1. 5(c) 2. S(d) G 87302(b)
1. 5 (d) second sentence
1. 5 (e) G 87302(a) 2.S(e) G 87302(b)
1. 5 (f) G 87302(b) second sentence
f~S(g) first sentence· 2.5(f) G 87302(b)
second sentence
l.5(h) G 87302(b) 2·. 6 G 87302(b)
third sentence fourth sentence
1. 5 (i) 2.6(a) G 87206(c)
·2.1 G 87302(b) 2.6(b) G 87206 (a)
first sentence 2.6(c) . G 87206 (d)
2.2 R 18115 (a) 2.6(d) G 87206(f)
·2.3(a) G 87302(b) 2.7 G 87302(b)
sixth sentence fourth sentence
2.3(b) G 87302(b) 2.7(a) G 87206(b)"
seventh sentence 2.7{b) G 87206(b)
2.3(c) c· 87302 (b) 2.7(c)· G 87206 (a)
eighth sentence 2. 7 (d) G 87206(d)
2.4 G 87302(b) 2.7(e) G 87206(f)
first sentence 2.8 G 87302(b)
2.5 G 87302(b) fifth sentence
second sentence 2.8(a) G 87207(a)(l)
2.S(a) G 87302(b) 2.8(b) G 87207 (a) (1)
second sentence 2.8(c) G 87207(a)(2)
2. S(a)(l) G 82035 2.8(d) G 87207(a)(3) · 2.5(a)(2) G"82033 2.8(e) G 87207 (a) (4)
first sentence 2.8(f)(l) G 87207 (b) (1) 2.5(~) (3) G 82033 2. 8 (f)(2) G 87207(b)(2)
First proviso G 82033 2.8(f)(3) G 87207(b)(3) · Second proviso G 87206(e) 2. 9 . G 87206 and 87207
2. 5 (b) G 87-302(b) 3.1· G 87302(c)
second sentence 3.2 R 18700(b)
2.5(b) (1) G 82034 3.3 R 18700(c)
·first sentence 3~4 R 18700(d)
and G 82035 3.5 . G 87302(c)
2. 5 (b)(2) G 82034 second sentence
second sentence and G 87103 2. 5 (b)(3) G 82034 ~3.6(a) R 18702(a) First proviso G 82034 3.6(b) R 18702(b)
fourth sentence 3.6(c) R 18702(c) Second proviso G 87206 (e) 3.7 Last paragraph G 82034
third sentence
-2.S(c) G 87302(b) -----------------second sentence 2.scc>c1> G 87302(b) *.Ga Government Code
third sentence Ra Regulations of the Fair 2. 5(c)(2) G 87207(a)(l) Political Practices Commission 2.5(c) (3) G 82030(a) in Division VI, Title 2 of the
California Administrative Code
WJML:
RESOLUTION NO. ---
A RESOLUTION SETTING TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING
ON PROPOSED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of
-------District, ---------County, California, as
follows:
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 87300 requires every local
government agency to adopt and promulgate a Conflict of Interest
Code;
WHEREAS, there has been presente~ to this Board a proposed
Conflict of Interest Code for this District", a copy of which is on
file with the of the District; and --------
\ wHEREAS, Government Code Section 87311 requires that the
r_eview and preparation of Conflict of Interest Codes shall be
carried out under procedures which guarantee officers, employees,
members, and consultants of the District and to residents of the·
jurisdiction adequate notice and a fair opportunity to pres~nt
their views ;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED:
1. That _______ , the __ day of ·, 1976, ------
at the hour of ___ o'clock _.M .. , in the regular meeting place of
this Board,
California, be, and the same are hereby, appointed and fixed as the
time and place when and where this Board.will consider and determine
whether.the aforesaid proposed Conflict of Interest Code shall be
adopted.
2.. That the of this District be, and is --------
hereby, directed to give notice of said hearing by publication of
this resolution ~n full once, at least ten days prior to said hearing,
in the -----------'-------' a newspaper of general
c~rculation in the District.
3. That the -~-----of this District be, and is hereby,
directed to distribute one copy of this resolution together with
one copy of the aforesaid Conflict of Interest Code to each person
or persons holding positions· within the District enumerated in
Exhibit "A" of said Code.
4. That the of this District.be, and is
hereby. ·directed to file copies of said Conflict of Interest Code
in the Di.strict office to be available £:or distribution to persons
requesting the same.
* * * * *
(Certificate)
...
-2-
11391 ACACIA PARKWAY, P. 0. BOX 1437 e JEFFERSON 4-39'3 e GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA 92642
March 9, 1976
County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention: Fred Harper,
Genera l Manager
Dear Fred:
The Sanitary District is in the process of forming a
Special Assessment District under the Street Improvement Act
of 1911 or 1913 for the purpose of financing the construction
of sewers to serve 21 homes constructed in Garden Grove on
Ranchero Way and Ranchero Place in 1952 .
While reviewing the cost of this project, it was noted
that the County Sanitation District fees totaled $4620, which
repres ents over 46% of the estimated construction cost of
$10,000.
Because this is a low income neighbor hood , the combina-
tion of construction costs, fees, and incidental expenses
would create an unusual financ ial hardship on the residents
which may ultimately lead them to abandon the project; the re-
fore, after considering that these residents have been paying
taxes to the County Sanitation District for a number of years
without receiving any direct benefits , the Board of Directors
of the Garden Grove Sanitary District voted unanimously at
their last meeting to r e quest the County Sanitation District
to waive the connection fee of $220.00 per unit.
In keeping with its policy to minimize the sewer connec-
tion expenses to the users whenever unusual costs a r e incurred
by them, the Sanitary District expects to waive its Sewer Service
Use Fee.
Your consideration in this matter will be appreciated.
BP/bf
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ROBERT H . MAIN, PIU!itl!!ll!ll'f; WALTER M. BRESSEL, 6ee11e'l'#<AY; OR . SHELDON S . SINGER: NORMAN E. CULVER: ROBERT PERRY
~ -r --.
M E M 0 R A N D U M
April 29, 1976
TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager
FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
SUBJECT: EIS/EIR for Facilities Plan Step 1 Grant
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71.C) 5.C0-2910
(714) 962-2.C 11
In March of 1975 the State along with the EPA offered a Step 1 Grant to
preparethe facilities plan and EIR for the future facilities contemplated
by the Sanitation Districts to meet the State and Federal requirements
for wastewater discharges to the ocean environment. It is a requirement
of the EPA to "author" an environmental impact statement whenever the
anticipated or estimated cost of facilities are in excess of $10 million.
The EPA has three choices for the preparation and finalization of an EIS
which are as follows:
1. Preparation of an EIS with their own staff.
2. Contract directly with the consulting firm for the preparation of
an EIS.
3. Authorize the grantee to contract for the EIS efforts under their
guidance.
Alternate No. 1 is not a feasible alternative in as much as the Region IX
staff is inadequate to handle the efforts involved with the preparation of
the EIS and alternate No. 2 does not lend itself to the present procedures
of the EPA because of budget regulations in certain areas. Alternate No. 3
is the most popular alternative which has been utilized by Region IX to
cause the preparation and finalization of an EIS for major wastewater
treatment facilities.
In March 1975 the Boards of Directors approved a contract with J. B. Gilbert
and Associates to prepare an EIS in the amount of $60,000 based upon the
scope of work as outlined in the memorandum of understanding as attached
to the State Step 1 Grant.
This memorandum of understanding set forth a time schedule and scope of
work which indicated that the EIS should be completed in February of 1976.
Since that time, the EPA has been faced with subsequent regulations which
have expanded the scope of work which was included in the original memorandum
of understanding.
COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM No. 4
Fred A. Harper
April 29, 1976
Page Two
In recent discussions with the EPA, the State and the Districts' consultant
"J. B. Gilbert and Associates", it is estimated that the extended scope of
work will add an additional $90,000 to the efforts required by the Districts'
consultant hired on the direction of the EPA. Attached herewith is an
outline as submitted by J. B. Gilbert and Associates for the additional
work as required. It is now estimated that the public hearing on the EIS
will be held no later than December 15th of this year with a publishing of
the final EIS to be in February·of 1977.
It should be pointed out that no additional capacities or improved treatment
can be added until the EIS is completed. Also it has come to the Districts
attention that a similar EIS for the Los Angeles County Sanitation District
expended $250,000. In the original memorandum of understanding, the Districts' .
consultant, J. B. Gilbert and Associates, was not charged with the responsibility of
printing of the final EIS document. It was originally contemplated that the
District would handle the printing of around 300 copies of this EIS. The EPA
has now requested that 1200 copies be printed in multiple colors which will
cost approximately $35,000. Therefore, I recommend that the contract with
J. B. Gilbert and Associates be extended to include the additional scope of
work and outline their direction by the EPA in the amount not to exceed $90,000
for services plus an additional amount of $35,000 for the printing and
publication.
REL: SS
-
--.... --
ATTACHMENT l
SUMMARY OF ANTICIPATED COSTS
CSDOC EIR/EIS
After May 1, 1976
•.
Development of supplemental information and data
requested by EPA for incorporation in the draft
including:
Marine biology
Air quality
Land use
Institutional framework and
mitigation measures
Miscellaneous supplemental work
Report preparation expenses
including drafting and
additional typing
Printing of Draft EIR/EIS
Contingency
$ 6,000
3,000
6,000
5,000
5,000
15,000
35,000
10,000
$ 85,000
Additional work on development of reclamation
alternatives for incorporation into the
Facilities Plan and EIR/EIS:
Engineering
Environmental assessment
Total additional anticipated costs of
preparing Draft EIR/EIS
$ 10,000
5,000
$ 15,000
$100,000
Note: These costs do not include the preparation of
responses to the comments on the Draft EIR/EIS nor
printing. Our experience has been that these costs
are a minimum of $25,000 equally divided between
reproduction of the Final EIS and professional time.
The exact level of effort required should be determined
by the District and EPA following the comment period.
MAY 121 1976
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR TUESDAY1
JUNE 1) 1976. INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO
ATTEND:
DONALD HOLT
MIRIAM KAYWOOD
(?tUCE MACLA~
THOMAS McKNEW
STANLEY MEYER) JR.
J. WAYNE SYLVESTER
DIRECTOR 01" l"INANCIE AND
SECRETARY TO THIE llOARD8 01" DIRECTORS
PHONES: C714]
540-2910
962-2411
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
P. o. Box a 1 27 -1 0844 ELLIS AVENUE
F"OUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF"ORNIA 92708
May 6, 1976
Mayor Wieder:
Agenda material for the City of Huntington
Beach representatives were sent to Connie
Bauer at City Hall pursuant to her request.
Rita
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P . 0. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FR EEWAY)
City of Huntington Beach
P. 0. Box 190
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Attention: Connie Bauer
May 6, 1976
Pursuant to your request, enclosed herewith are four agenda packages
for the Joint Board me eting on May 12, 1976. Please distribute to the
mayor and the appropriate co un ci l members that will be representing
the City on our Board of Directors.
Enclosures
Rita Brown
Assistant to the
Secretary of the Board
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
:1'>1.S..
MEETING DATE May 12, 1976 TIME 7:30 p.m. D I ST R I CT S 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 and 11
DISTRICT 1
~DI EDRJCH) •.••••• BATTIN •..•. _..; ___ . __ _
'ANS) ...••••... GARTHE •..•• _..; ____ _
"'-""' ·~RIMA ....•.• " . --( ~~--(EDGAR). • .... SHARP ...... __ ~ ~
DISTRICT 2
(DIEDRICH) •••••.• CLARK •••••• ~ ----
!GARTHE) •....••.• EVANS •..••• _v_ ----
~lEDDLE) • ~ ••••••• FOX ••.•.•.•. _./ ____ _
DE J~sus) ••••.•. HOLT ••.•.••• _v'_ ----
THOM) • • . • . • • • . . • KAYWOOD . . • • _1 _ __ __
. PERRY .••.•• _L_ ___ _
HOLL I ND EN) ••.••. SCOTT • . . • • • ' .
HOYT) ••.••...•..• SMITH ••.•.• -.;-----
GROOT) ••••••••.• WEDAA •.•••• -.;-----
TIPTON) ••••••.•• WINN .•••••• -"-----
WARD) ••••.••••••• WOOD • • . • • • • -,; -----
GRAHAM) ••••••••• YOUNG . . . • • • ./ == ==
DISTRICT 3
(WEDDLE)········· COOPER····· _.;_ --__
(HOMR I GHAUSEN) • · COX········· -~-___ _
CULVER •••.. _v ____ _
(GARTHE) .••. ~~ ... EVANS •..••. _./ ____ _
~PR I EST) •. i~d"·~t;' .. FRESE ..••.. _v' ____ _
iOM) •••.•••..•.. KAYWOOD. . • . ..;
cr'ACAYO) •••••••.. MAC LAIN •.. -/-----
(BLACKMAN) ••••.•. MC KNEW .••• -J-----
(DAV Is) ••..•..•..• MEYER • . . . • . v' == ==
OLSON • . . • . . ./
(DIEDRICH).······ SCHMIT.··.. ./ == ==
!
YOUNG) ••••••.•.• STEVENS ••.• -"-___ _
HOLLINDEN) .••••. SVALSTAD •.. _.; ____ _
WOOD) .••.....•••• WA-Rf):-••••••• _/ ____ _
MILLER) •••••. hh .. WE IS HAU P;l· . __L ___ _ PATTINSON).~!. 5. WIEDER )'if\. _.:L_ ___ _
DISTRICT 5
./ MC INNIS···. ------
( D I ED R IC H) • • • · • • · R I LEY • · · • · . _ ..... _ --__
(WILLIAMS) •••••.. ROGERS·····~ ___ _
DISTRICT 6
(DIEDRICH) •...••. BATTIN ..... _J ____ _
RI MA • . . • . • . .;
(ROGERS) ......... H-YC~OFF.... v == ==
DISTRICT 7
f '"'OGERS) ••..••••. BARRETT .•.. -"-----
ILLS) •..•.•.••. BURTON •.••• _v _____ _
IEDRJCH) •.••••. CLARK •...•. ~ ___ _
VANS) •••.•••••• GARTHE •..•• _./ ____ _
. GLOCKNER ••• _./ ____ _
(EDGAR) .•.•..•••. SALTARELLI. _L ___ _
(HOYT) ••..••••••• SMITH ••...• -"'-___ _
DISTRICT 11
JOINT BOARDS
(ROGERS) • • •••.• ·BARRETT • • · · · • _../_ --~DI EDRJ CH) ••..• ·BATTIN·······_./_ --
SILLS) · • •.•...• BURTON • • • • • • · _./_ --
D I ED R I CH) . • •.• · CLAR K • • • • · • • · ~ --
(WEDDLE) • ·······COOPER • • • • • • • -",--(HOMR I GHAUSEN). COX •••.•••.•.• _v __ _
. CULVER·······-"---!GARTHE-~ • ·······EVANS·········-"-__
WEDDLE • • · · · • · · FOX ••.••.••••• _I __ _
PRIEST ········FRESE········· /
EVANS).········· GARTHE • •••.•• I ==
GLOCKNER • • • • • "
(DE J~sus) ••••.. HOLT •••.•••..• ../ =
(THOM) •..•..••.•• KAYWOOD • • • . • • "
( LACA vol ........ MAC LA IN ••.•. -v---
(ROG ER S ) .•••..•.. MC INNIS ••••• -,,---
(BLACKMAN). .•... MC KNEW ••.••• -"'---
(DAVI s) ..•....... MEYER •.•••••.• -... ---
OLSON ••.••.••. -, ---
PERRY ••.•••••• -"---
( D I ED R I CH) •••... R I LEY •••.••••• -"---
RI MA ••••••.•.. -../---
(WILLIAMS) ••••.• ROGERS........ v ==
(ROGERS) ..•.•..• RYCKOFF •••••. _k
(EDGAR) .....•.... SALTARELLI... " --
(DIEDRICH) •.•... SCHMIT •••••••• -J---
(HOLL I NDEN) ••... SCOTT ••••...•. -"---
(EDGAR) .••..•••.• SHARP •.•..•.•• -a,-. --
!
HOYT) •.••.•..• ~. SMITH ..•••.... -v---
YOUNG) ...•.•••.. STEVENS •.•••. -"---
HOLL I NDEN) .••.. SVALSTAD •••.. -v---
WOOD) ..•••.••... 'WARD.-: ......•• -ZV---
GROOT) .••...•... WEDAA .•.•....• -v---
(MILLER). •.••.... WE I SHAU PT •..• -v---
(PATT I NSON/ ••••. WI EDER ••.•.. -~ --
SHENKMAN) . --
(TIPTON) ••••.•.. WINN •••....••• -.,,---
(WARD) .•••...••.. WOOD •••..••••. -7---
(GRAHAM) ••••••... YOUNG ....•..•• --
OTHERS ~ ll'' -" ~o~
I\ ...-L( HARPER f,
1
,,~.,..,. ~1 l.1 .. ) SYLVESTER
--. R "v·-· c.J LEW I S
f/\·v CLARKE
fl~} TAYLOR
BROWN
WOODRUFF
EWING
./
-'-./
./
-..;-
. I/
(DIEDRICH) ••••... SCHMIT •.••. + --__ ·,( r'. A,."' .....
(SHENKMAN) •••• r r. WI EDER ••••• --7-----. -) ; ''./
. ~ ~·~i .litY. .... ~ ----
HO HEN ER
HOWARD
HUNT
KEITH
KENNEY
LYNCH
MADDOX
MARTINSON
PIERSALL
STEVENS
TRAVERS DISTRICT 8
EDWARDS ••••
(JOHNSON) •••••••• HOLM ••••••• ------
(DIEDRICH) •••••.• RILEY •••••• ======
5/12/76
MEETING DATE May 12, 1976 TIME 7:30 p.rn. D I ST R I c Ts 1, 2, 3, s, 6, 7 and 11
DISTRICT 1
(DI EDRJCH) ...•••. BATJlli._ .•... _JC_ _. __ _
,....{!=VANS) ......•.. @RTtiLl .... ~ ___ _
RIMA .•..... ~ ___ _
(EDGAR) .....•..•• SHARP ..•... __Q::_ ___ _
DISTRICT 2
(DIEDRICH) ••..•.. CLARK ...... ~ ----
lGARTHE) •••••••.. EVANS ...... ~ ----
WEDDLE) ......... FOX ......... ~ ___ _
DE J~sus) ....... HOLT •....... _.JL_ ----
(THOM) ..•....•... KAYWOOD .... ~ ___ _
. PERRY ...... ___k:::_ ___ _
HOLLINDEN) ...... SCOTT ...... v __ ·
HD YT) ••...•.••... fil1Ut! .. . . . . ___L_ __ ==
GROOT)··········~······~ TI PION) ......... WINN . . . . . . . v-----
WARD) ....••...•.. WOOD . . . . . . . -V-----
GRAHAM). •....•.. YOUNG ...... ~ == ==
DISTRICT 3
(WEDDLE)········· COOPER····· ~ --__
(HOMR IGHAUSEN) ··COX··.······· _lL.. ___ _
CULVER ..... ~ ___ _
(GARTHE) ......... EVANS •..... ~ ___ _
(PRIEST) ......... FRESE ...... ----1L...
(THOM) .....•...... KAYWOOD.... V"'" ----
(LACAYO) ......... MAC LAIN ... ~ ----
(BLACKMAN) ....... MC KNEW.... v ----
(DAV Is) ........... MEYER ...... _.i.::::::_ == ==
OLSON ...... _L_ ___ _
(DIEDRICH).······ SCHMIT •.... ~ ___ _
(YOUNG) .•........ STEVENS .... ~ ___ _
HO NDEN) ...•.. SVALSTAD ... _lL::_ ___ _
OOD • • •........ ~ ........ __L_ ___ _
M ERL ........ WEISHAUPT .. ~ ___ _
PATTINSON) ...... WIEDER ~~ ___ _
DISTRICT 5
. ~··~----
(DIEDRICH).·····. RILEY······~ ----
(WILLIAMS).······ ROGERS····· _>.L_ ___ _
DISTRICT 6
(DIEDRICH) ...... ~N ..... _k:::_ ___ _
~······ i---
(ROGERS) ......... RYCl~OFF ..•. ~ == ==
DISTRICT 7
(ROGERS) .....•... BARRETT •••. ~ ----
( · 1-..Ls) .......... BURTON..... ~ ----
~)r{EDR I CH).~ • . . . . CLARK . . . . • • 0...... __ __
(EVANS) .......... GARTHE ..... _..a.::::::_ ___ _
~~~~~----
(EDGAR) ......... SAL JARELL ~ ___ _
(HOYT) •.......... SM I .•.... ~ ___ _
DISTRICT 11
(DIEDRICH) ..... ~.: .. v'" ----
(SllENl~MAN) .•..... WIEBER .•... --=-----......--
·~·····~·····~--
DIS RICT 8
5/12/76
JOINT BOARDS
(ROGERS) · · ...... BARRETT······ ............--
!DIEDRICH) ..... ·B ATTIN ·······~ --
SILLS) · · ....... BURTON · · · · · · · ............---
DIEDRICH) .... · ·CLARK········~ -
WEDDLE) · · ..•.. ·COOPER · · · · · .. ~ --
HOMR I GHAUSEN) ·COX···········~ --
. CULVER ...•... ~_
lGARTH.E). ····:'.··EVANS········· _l.L._ __
WEDDLE) · ·······FOX·· .. ·····•· ~ __
PR I EST) • ·······FRESE········· ~
EVANS).········· GARTHE · · · · · · · V" -
. . GLOCKNER.·.·. v -
(DE J[:SUS) ...... HOLT •.•....... v ==
(THOM) ..........• KAYWOOD ...... ~
(LACAY01 .......• MAC LAIN ..... ~==
(ROGERS) ......•.. MC INNIS •.... ~
(BLACKMAN). ..... MC KNEW ...... a..----
(DAV IS) .......... MEYER ......... ~==
0 LS 0 N ......... _i.:::::_ __
PERRY ........• ~
(DIEDRICH). ..... RILEY ......... v --
RIMA .......... ~==
(WILLIAMS). ..... ·ROGERS ........ ,,.,-__
(ROGERS) ........ RVCIWFF ...... -
(EDGAR) .......... SAL JARELL I ... ---V:---
(DIEDRICH) ...... SCHMIT •....... v----
(HOLLI NDEN) ...... SCOTT .•....... .,----
(EDGAR) .......... SHARP ......... a_, --
!HOYT) •.•...... ~.SMITH ......... v------
YOUNG) .......... STEVENS . . . . . . V' --
HOLLI NDEN) ..... SVALSTAD ..... ----;::::---
(WOOD) ........... -W>\ftB .......... v---
(GROOT) .......... WEDAA ......... --V---
(MILLER) ......... WE I SHAU PT.... v-==
(PATTINSON/. .... WIEDER ....... -
SHENKMAN) ~'OJ-~ --
(TI PION) ........ WINN .......... _k'.:::_ --(~) •.•.•..•.•. WOOD-•.•.•.•••• _ --
(GRAHAM) ......... YOUNG......... ;/ --
OTHERS
HARPER
SYLVESTER
LEWIS
CLARKE
TAYLOR
BROWN
WOODRUFF
EWING
HO HEN ER
HOWARD
HUNT
KEITH
KENNEY
LYNCH
MADDOX
MARTINSON
PIERSALL
STEVENS
TRAVERS
~
~
~
5-12-76 JOINT MEETING
(7a) Report of the Joint Chairma n
Winn announced a new chairman had been appointed to the SWRCB--John ??--filled
Ron Robie's position. Win Ad ams will continue to serve until January, 19~8.
He then called a meeting of the Executive Conunittee for June 1st and invit ed
Directors Holt, Kaywood & McKnew who couldn't make it and th en invited MacLain
who could attend. Also invited Young l a ter in the meeting.
Winn advised that he had asked Mr. Harp er to set a date for orientaticn me e t i ng
for new Directors and it h ad been set for June 16th at 5:30. Dinner will be served.
Said he needed a motion authorizing meeting a nd it was so moved, seconded a nd
carried. Said Directors would be notified .
(4) Approval of minutes
Director Cooper abstained from approving minutes of the 4/14/76 meeting as he was
not present at that meeting . Tom Woodruff said that the records would refl ect
the abstentions of all the new Directors since they were not there last time. ???
(5) Election of Chairmen & Chairmen pro tern
DISTRICT 1
DISTRICT 2
DISTRICT 3
DISTRICT S
DI STRICT 6
DISTRICT 7
Battin nominat e d and declined. Garth e nominat e d. No further
nominations . Garthe elect ed Chairman . Sharp nominat e d for Chairman
pro tern. No further nominations.
Wedaa nominated for Chairman. No further nomin at ions.
Scott nominated for Cha irman pro tern. No further nomin a tion s .
Wood nominat ed for Chairman. Was mentioned that she is not an
active Director in District 3 but she advised that would be changed .
Evans nomin ated but declined . No furth e r nominat ions.
Svalstad nomin ated for Ch a irman pro tern. No further nomin a tions.
Mcinnis nomin a ted for Chairman . No furth er nomin ation s .
Ril ey nominated for Chairman pro tern. No further nominations .
Rima nominated for Chairma n. No further nomin at ions.
Rycoff nominated for Chairman pro tern. No fur ther nomin a tions.
Saltarelli nominated for Ch airman. No further nominations.
Barrett n ominated for Chairman pro t ern. No further nominations .
DISTRICT 11 -No quorum at beginning of meeting. Later nomin ated Schmit for
Nominated Gibbs fo r Chairman Chairman. No furthe r nominations.
pro tern. No further nomin a tions.
(7b) Report of the Ge neral Ma nager
Mr. Harp er reporte d that following the May 4th Executive Committee meeting, h e ld
additional d i scu ss ions re EPA r equirements for Environmental Imp act Report of
Gilbert & Associates. Ex pres sed concern tha t EPA has in sis ted on in crea s ing the
scope of EIS. Will be more than doubling the contract . Said a s a result, Dep uty
Director of Water Program of Regiona l Offic e i n Sa n Fran c i sco advi s ed t h a t
they would like to meet with us and possible r e vise the scope ag ain. Possibly
downward. Said the staff recomme nd a tion is to approve the action on the agenda
but subj e ct to any modifications r e du c ing the costs as a result of these
discussions with EPA people.
Also advised that on May 24th the s t a ff will appear before the Coastal Commission
for a permit for the 75 MGD facility. Have b een advised by tel ephon e this week
that we failed to get a p e rmit for the pilot unit and the matter has been referred
to the State attorney 's office for som e kind of action. Said we did contact a
member of their staff some time a go and they said becaus e of temporary nature of
facility, a permit wouldn't be n e c e ssary . A permit application is now being
prepared which we will submit for that facility .
Regarding the 208 designation for the South Coast area, it has been made to SCAG
and we will b e submitting to Directors in the next few months an agreement enlisting
SCAG to do our portion of the work.
(7c) Report of the General Couns e l
TLW referred to the written report in Dire ctors fo l ders and briefly reported on
t h e three items. SEE ATTACHED REPORT. With regard to Item 1 -it was moved,
seconded and carried to authorize any litigation necessary for this claim.
(9) OJNSENT CALENDAR items removed
(h) Svalstad asked what this really means to us. Are getting i nto where State
dictates to local government when we build or not bu ild .
FAH sai d that State and EPA were reluctant to authorize additional capacity
in talking about grant funds. As far as treatment is concerned, is up to
Board . This does point up to several areas outside County in basin area.
Some of these areas are considered for our District eventually. Carbon
Canyon is one. Think r e quest of County for service will move things
a l ong for additional capacity. State does want us to service these areas.
This does have quite a few ramifications but think it would help us .
Cooper asked if we would have specific information on this and when they
would have facts on this? FAH said it would probably be a couple months .
Wan t t o move ahead and County needs indication that we are willing to do
this as they have to study City of LaHabra system.
Robin Young advised that City of LaHabra is investigating possibility of
a nn exing some of these LA County areas an d is t i ed into this .
Cooper said he was concerned about ramifications of this particular
sit uation in reference to areas above City of Brea and,therefore, would
like as much information as possible on this entire plan . Would like to
have his city and other cities get the information .
(9d) Director Wood then briefly reported on her attendance at National Association
of Regional Councils' Water Quality Work s hop relative to 208 Planning held in
Burlingame. Said it was long, confusing and redundant but information was
very valuable for her. Brou ght some p a pers for other Directors if they were
interested. Thought "How to Allocate Our Priorities" was very interesting.
-2-
(12a) Conflic t of Int erest Code
TLW advised that a t the Executive Committee meeting l ast week , he was ins tructed
to writ e a lette r to th e Fair Labor Practices Board se ekin g an opinion on question
of whether Directors n eed to file additional reports b esides filing with city or
sanita ry district. There is some debate on determination of whe t her we would
ne e d to fil e . Said it seemed to him that we could avo id a lot of paperwork .
Th e argument again st this i s that there may be items affected may be outside of
city but may be within jurisdiction of District. Has prepared l etter and ·hope to
get opinion within 30-40 days. Explain ed t h at reso l ution on agenda simp l y sets
the next Board mee ting to hold public h earing to consider code whether it app l ies
to Directors or not. Will hav e to adopt as it ap plies to our emp l oyees anyway .
All supervi sory personne l and above and consultants.
(12b) Garden Grove San itary District r equest for waiver of connection fees
(1) Robin Youn g said she read TLW memo and unders t ood but wondered if there is any l egal
way that the Di s trict s , if they were so inclined, could adopt a pol icy co n cerning
spec i a l redeve lopment or low cost housing. A blanket exemp tio n, not a spec ial
exemp tion . TLW said y es, we wo uld have to ame n d our ordinance but could be done .
Young then urged tha t Directors cons i der a discussion on that at some point .
Said governmental agencies should examine this a nd see what could be done . Win n
said we could refer this to Executive Committee and request Young attend.
Perry the n said he moved the agenda item--didn 't want to open a can of worms .
Young said we should po ssib l y hold off on this . Culver agreed with Robin . Thought
that E.C. t ook it on an i so l a t e d basis. It is far reachin g and coul d help a lot
of communi ties . Youn g then asked if we c h a n ge our policy, coul d Garde n Grove S.D .
reapply? Winn stat ed th ey shou ld receive and f i le item (1) and continue to
item (2) if it is the pleasure of the Board. Moved & seconded to receive & file
Gen e ral Coun se l's opinion .
(2) TLW indicated tha t hi s co n cern in d e f erring item 2 was the Assessment Distri c t
proceedings being in l imbo a wa iting action by the Board . Are probably n ot prepared
to wait 2 or 3 months. Young asked , what abo ut gr andfath erin g them in and give
mon ey b a ck? TLW said not permissab l e . Would a lready have money and thou gh t they
wou ld hav e some real t echni cal difficulties with assessment district.
MacLain asked if there is a possibl ity of reducing some of these charges . Winn said
he thought it was discussed .
FAH the n r eported that the staff was ins truc t e d by the E.C. a mo nth ago to determi ne
wh at t axes h ad been paid for these prop erties . Th e d etermin ation made was someth ing
l ess than $1 ,000. since inception of District for operation and maintenance .
They receive no benefit for this . Committee discussed possibility of giving them
an al l owance for these t axes; however , the General Counse l advised i f you do it for
one, you h ave to do it for al l. Fe l t it would b e very expensive to try to make that
d etermina tion.
Ka ywood ask ed i f it would b e possib l e to say "under redeve l opment " in cases wh ere
prior t axes were paid . TL W said co uld revise the ordinance to limit it in scope
for fixed circumstances--under assessment district or redevelopment or something .
Svalstad then moved agenda item #12(b) (2) to deny request . Motion seconded .
Was stated that Directors had to approve this motion or change ordin ance . TLW added
th at time was very critical. If amend ordinance, a r e looki n g at least 2 months .
-3-
•
Was asked about an emergency ordinance. TLW said we are empowe r ed t o adopt but would
h ave trouble proving that it is an emergency based upon the health and welfare of
the people. Would also have to 4/5 vote.
Called for the question. Voice vote. Motion carried.
Directors wanting their no votes recorded raised their hands--Director s Culver,
Kaywood, MacLain, Olson, Perry and Young.
Culver s t ated t hat he stil l thought it should be further discussed at Executive
Committee meeting an d should ask Rob in Young to a ttend.
(12 c ) Amendment to agr eemen t with J. B. Gilb ert & Assoc .
FAH reit erated that the staff is recommending tha t the re be a n exclusion on this
item that in the event they can n egotiate a l esser amount and EPA reduces the scope
of the EIS, tha t this be inc luded in the action.
Svalstad then stated that the 87~% is paid by somebody else and that somebody else
is us. Asked if this was justified . FAH answered tha t ·this is why we we r e go ing
to have additional dis c ussions with EP A people. Said we let t h is contract one year
ago and thought by now we could be fini shed up with this. Now they want to increase
whole scope of it by 15 0%. Are disturbed about that. New regulations have come
into place since cont ract was awarded . Also are other considerations that they
want in this EIS . Statement wi ll be EPA's statement, n ot ours . Svlastad t hen
asked what the major thing was that doubles the cost . FAH said they want to expand
on air qu a l i ty impacts as well as look at reclamation, which i s ver y considerab le
in this state. Are hoping tha t we can sit down with Deputy Director of Water Program
and get a lesser scope . Asked if this is a test case a n d FAH answered no, LA just
completed theirs and spent $250 ,000.
REL explained further that at some of the hearings on the EIS they found cert ain
deficiencies in those areas on air quality which prompted the s cope change. Also,
Ron Robi e and his committee, i n try ing to update the water program in Ca liforni a ,
brought forth the reclamation area. Fe lt that they should expand th e scope. Will
be perhaps b etter refined next week when we meet with EPA .
Young asked i f EPA is manda t i n g the increase, why aren't they paying for al l of it,
not just ]5%. Asked what h appens if we say no. FAH said that would be very interesting.
Young then moved that they pick up the whole tab for what they have manda t ed . Motion
was seconded. TLW restated the amended motion--To make approva l of amendme nt
continge nt upon EPA paying 100%.
REL then explained that this EIS is under a Step I grant which is und er federa l l aw
and all regulations. Federal law says that all they can do is pay 75 %. If we
contingent this on 10 0%, we are stopped . Either you approve or don 't . Hopefully ,
we can r educe it. FAH added that 75% paid by feds, 1 2 ~ state and 12 ~% is ours.
Asked why t his has tak en so long and ~as a n swered that EPA in San Fran cisco found
other areas where they have been deficient and changed requirements. We can't
proceed to build any capacity until the EIS is completed.
Svalsta d asked for a point of infor ma tion-~about the original printing costs .
REL said wh en we accepted Gi lbert 's proposa l, original printing wasn't inc l uded
but didn't f eel printing cost would be more than $2,000-$3,000. Now want 1200 copies .
Saltarelli then stated that although h e agreed that he didn't like it, it woul d b e
most inappropriate to continue with this because we have a n ob l igat i on to cont inue
with the treatment faci lities . Would lik e to direct Joint Chairman to writ e a
letter givin g our views though. Winn advised that TLW has drafted a letter for his
signature which d oes basically what Sa ltarel li said .
-4 -
Woodruff read four basic objections from draft letter. SEE LETTER. ATTACHED.
Need some action tonight along the lines of Saltarelli. Asked Young if she
would be agreeable to withdrawing her motion and proceeding. She said she
wasn't sure. Thought there was considerable consensus to her motion at the
time and wasn't sure if it had eroded or not.
Svalstad asked why the rush, did it just come up in the l a st week or so? FAH
advised that there was a meeting in Sacramento on April 27 and a t that time the
request from EPA to expand this was received. Gilbert h a s been wor k ing on this
over a year and would like to have had it done sooner but was waiting for the
result of JPL and it wasn't completed.
Mcinnis then stated that nobody in this room wants to ge t tapped for $90,000 but
they are playing $90,000 against $200 million!! Said he would like to consider
Saltarelli's suggestion as a motion and will second it. Motion was restated to
approve Resolution No. 76-92 and staff and Executive Committee's recommendation
and send letter regarding Directors' strong feelings in this case.
Some discussion & Called for the question.
Voice vote. Motion carried.
(13) Staff report on JPL-ACTS Pilot Plant facility
REL reported that Facilities Plan is being prepared concurrent with EIS for
project needs for 20 years. Are on project list for 9ver $330 million. Will
cost $571 million to meet requirements of these Districts, State and EPA. Have
been working on JPL pilot project for last year and have received a lot of
favorable commentary from EPA and Washington. Very impressed with rapid con-
struction. Built a $2~ million plant in 6 months. Normally would take 18 months.
Then showed slides of JPL-ACTS Pilot Plant facility and explained future expansion
plans at Plant 2.
Afterwards stated that we would like to present this to State as our approach
and to Coastal Commission if their were no objections. No objections made.
(14) ALL DISTRICTS -Other business
Wedaa stated he had a question regarding procedures. Noticed we elected Chairmen
tonight. Why not nominate Joint Chairman. TLW advised that our procedural
resolution does specify clearly that nominations for Joint Chairman and Vice
Joint Chairma·n will be in June and election will be in July. If the resolution
is modified, we could do that but would be inappropriate with existing resolution.
Culver added that the Directors decided some time ago to have the new members
observe Directors before voting on Joint Chairman.
(17) DISTRICT 2 -Other business
Kaywood reported that there was a developer in Anaheim using only the low volume
toilets. Commented on the newspaper article sent to Dir e ctors on this subject.
-5-
RICHARD O. f'RAZEE
STEPHEN C.STEWART
THOMAS L. WOOORUrr
..tErf'REY A. HARTMAN ·
Company.
LAW OF'F'ICES
Stewdrt, 'f ooJruff & Frazee
1055 NORTH MAIN STRE.E.T, SUITE. 1020
SANTA ANA, CALI F'ORNIA 92701
May 12, 1976
AGENDA ITEM #7Cc)
AREA COOE 714
835-6212
GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT TO DIRECTORS
NON-AGENDA ITEMS
1. Contract 3-18 -Claim Against Southern California Gas
During the course of construction of this job by our
contractor, Tutor-Saliba, it was discovered that a bend in the gas
lines and concrete valve vaults were located within the District's
right of way and were exposed during the trenching operations. At
the time of design of the project by Boyle Engineering, the pro-
posed plans were submitted to Southern California Gas Company for
their review, together with a request for an identification of all
existing lines which they possessed. The plans were reviewed by
the Gas Company and, by correspondence from them, they indicated
an approval without noting the existence of the abandoned lines.
Upon discovery of these lines by our contractor, the
District's inspectors and engineers contacted the Gas Company who
came to the location of the job and inspected the system. On the
direction of the District, the contractor was ordered to request
to remove the abandoned gas lines, which necessitated a considerable
extra excavation and labor. The contractor had requested a change
order in the sum of $96,000.00, but the District approved the
change order in the sum of $28,754.00, which sum was agreed to by
Tutor-Saliba.
The District has now invoiced the Gas Company for the
sum of $28,754.00 on the basis that they negligently failed to
disclose their lines and, in accordance with the Board of Director's
policy of December, 1975. By my memorandum opinion to the Board
dated December 5, 1975, I had indicated that the Districts do
have the right to recover from third parties who have been respon-
sible for the incurring of additional costs to our contractor.
At that time, the Directors adopted a policy that each claim would
be reviewed on a case by case basis, but that the staff was generally
directed to pursue these claims and recover the costs incurred.
.,
Report to Directors
May 10, 1976
Page Two
In view of the significant sum of money involved in
this change order, it is our recommendation that the Directors
authorize the staff to proceed, to and including the filing of
necessary litigation to recover the total sum owing from the
Southern California Gas Company, on the basis of their negligence
in· failing to note their existing lines.
2. Contract of Sale of 12 KV Power Line to Southern
California Edison Company.
In accordance with previous action of the Board of
Directors, the staff and this office have negotiated with repre-
sentatives of the Edison Company to sell the existing 12 KV line
to the Edison Company, together with the granting of a license
to maintain said line across District properties. The line will
be used to interconnect Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2 and will pro-
vide emergency standby power to both facilities. The agreement
has been prepared and submitted to Edison for review, and my office
has been advised by letter dated May 11, 1976 that the Edison
Company has one objection to-the proposed sale agreement, namely,
that it exists only for a life of twenty-five years.
Under the present arrangements, the Edison Company
does have an agreement with the District for an indefinite term
and it was my recoromendation that the license agreement should
have a fixed duration of such length as to insure that Edison
could amor.tize the full costs in the event the agreement was not
renewed. The duration of twenty-five years was agreed to between
the General Manager and myself and was incorporated into the
agreement, but is now being objected to by Edison.
While I have no strong objection to an agreement of
greater duration, it is my recommendation that the twenty-five
year term be included with the proviso that it could be extended
upon mutual consent of both parties at the end of that time
period. It is my opinion that such a duration adequately allows
the Edison Company to amortize the costs of such line, but still
affords the District the opportunity at the end of this period
to reconsider whether the existence of that line is in the best
interests of the District's operation.
In the event the present negotiations between my
office and the representatives of Edison fail to reach an agree-
ment over the twenty-five year term, the matter will be presented
to the District Board for its action at the next regular Board
meeting.
Report to Directors
May 12, 1976
Page Three
3. Litigation Status -Dixon vs. County Sanitation District;
Elduayen vs. County Sanitation District; and Zimmerman vs. County
Sanitation District.
Each of these three items involves acase of personal
injury incurred by employees of Donovan Construction Company while
engaged in the performance of their employment during the construc-
tion at Plant No. 1. These matters are presently being defended
by Providence Washington Insurance Company, the insurance carrier
for the District. Therefore, any. losses will be covered by the
liability insurance carrier of the District, rather than the
District's general fund. However, at the present time, demand
has been made by my office, pursuant to the provisions of our
construction agreement with Donovan, that they assume the respon-
sibility for the defense of these actions. The demand required
that acknowledgment on their behalf be made by May 12, 1976. As
of the time of this report, no such acknowledgment has been received
and therefore the District is going to proceed on the basis of
charging back all costs of legal defense to Donovan until such
time as they provide legal counsel to assume the defense on behalf
of the District's interests.
Thom~~~nf--r>-u
General Counsel
TLW:ab