Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-04-14COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) April 8, 1976 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. lJ 2J 3) SJ 6J 7) 8) & 11 WEDNESDAY) APRIL 14) 1976) 7:30 P.M, 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY) (AL!FORNIA TELE PH ON ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 11 cf Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. Scheduled upcoming meetings: DISTRICT 1 ADJOURNED MTG. -Wednesday, April 21, 1976, 5:00 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE -Tuesday, Aprjl 27, 1976, 5:30 p.m. (Tentative) -.- 4 ' . ··-~. MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT Post Office Box .8127 Coun~y Sanitation Districts of O~af!ge "county, California 10844 'Ellis Ave nue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: .JOINT BOARDS ·. Area Code 714 . 540-2910 . 962-2411 . . ,. April 14, ·1 97-6 .:... 7": :30 :p~m . . ·· · Regul~r ·Mee ting ·, . ~. . .,. ;. .. . • • • .. 1 • • -·· The following is a bri.ef explanation of_'. the more important, ·rion-routine items which -appear on the enclos ed agendA and ~hioh are -not oth e rwis e self-explanatory. Warrarit lists are now en- closed with the agenda material, summarizing bills· paid since · the Mar~h Joint Board meeting~ · Joint Boards ... No~ 9-a -Authorizing Sale of Obsolete Accounting Equipment. ~ith implementation ·of the Xerox Cbmputer Servicis data ·processing system, the Distric.ts' NCR-400 and NCR -33 accounting equipment became obsolete. Following convers ion to .EDP and pu~suant to authorization -by the Boards ~f Directors, the· Dis- ~ricts received bids on obso·lete office Gqu i .pment . Bid p:::-oposals were mailed to 22 office equipment dealers in Souther·n California, and other interested parties. No bids~ howeve ~,-were rece ived on the ab6ve-named machines. Subsequently, we received an offer .from Turner Data Systems, !nc.; t6 purchase the e~uipment ·for a ·nominal amount. If acquired, they will use the. machines for spare parts . Inasmuch as this equipment is no longer in p roduc ti on by National Cash Register Comp any , it would appear that acceptance of the proposal from Turner Data Systems would b e appropriate at this time. No. 9-b -Consideration of Actions Re: Purchase of Eng ines for Rothrock Outfall Boo s ter Station. Included in the Joint Works Master Plan of Construction f or the Fiscal Year 1976-77, is the rehabi litati on of pumping equ ipment at the Rothrock Outfall Booster Pumping Station. This project consists of installing new , larger engines and gears , and in- creas ing the p ump runn ing speed so the flo w may be pumped to a higher level in the surge tower (which is being extended at the present time). This project would usually be scheduled after July 1 when the new fiscal year begins; however , we have located two eng i nes that meet our requirements which were previously sold but not run. These engin es have been inspected by our personnel and fou nd to be in excellent condition. We be lieve they can be purc h ased for $56,000 plus taxes and freight each, which is a signific a nt savi ngs from the currently-quoted price of $77,000 each for like equipm ent . !_ .To establish the current price, we suggest receiving bids for ·: up to thre e engines, comparing bi.d prices with our quotes, .and . if found favorabl e,. to award o ne bid e n g ine at the May Joint Board meeting and purchase, ~now, the two "used" .engines f ·o'r-the quoted $5E,ooo ~lus t~xes and freight .··. = · No . 9-c ·~ Aut~ori~ing Agreement with Sotithern Californi~­ Edison re: 12 KV Interplant Line. . ·The staf"f and Gene·ral Coun s el hav.e prepared .this · agreement · as -.:· directed by · the Boards at the February 11, 1976 · meeting.. It " e·ncompasses the transfe r ·. of ownership and granting of easement .to Edison in exchange for $_1 1,500 cash ,· and the consideration tha t "Edison will~ at no cost to the Districts,· maintain emergency systems for each Plant to be used in the event pf failure of the· regular source of power . No. 9 -d En g ineer . Authorizing In creas e in Salary for Associate One of our engineering department staff members, Nicholas DiBenedetto, has recently received notification that h e has successfu l ly passed the State examination for re gis tration in civil engineering . In .recogn ition of this accomplishment, we are recommendi ng that Mr . DiBenedetto be granted a 1/2 step increase in sal a ry. This reco mme nda tion is c onsistent with recognition of other members o·r the engi neer ing department who have successfully passed the State registratio~ examination. No. 9-e -Change Order No. 6 to Contract No. Pl-lu. During the spring of 1974 when the plans and specifications for the 4 6-mgd Activated Sludge Additions ~-to Reclamation Plant No . 1 were being prepared, the consultant and Districts' staff were contacted by six major engine manufacturers who said they could meet the specifications to supply the equipment necessary for this job. After award wa s made to Donovan Construction Company in 1974, the contractor attempted to place an order with DeLaval Engine Company who stipulated that they would only supply their standard engine and would not customize th eir engine for this application. The other engine manufacturers had declined to enter into a co n tract with the contractor because of dis- continuing this type of engine in their line . After considerable deliberation by staff and the consultant, it was felt that the ebullient cooling would not be requir ed at this time, nor would it be utili zed in the future, therefore, this requirement for ebullient cooling was deleted at a cost savings of $30,000, which h as been passed on to the Districts . This $30 on schedule . Ch a nge Order $411,000 . million contract is 80% complete and is approximately To date, five change orders hav e been approved; No. 6 will incre a se the total deductions to around -2- .·. .. No. 9 -f -Change Order No. 1 to Job No. PW -046 . The contractor , in performing the work for the demolition of t he metering vaults and the abandoned shop at Plant No . 1 , en - counter ed undisclosed utilities and other substructures which ·delayed ·his progress. In addition, the contractor was delayed ~ecause of inclement weather and hi~ inability to .obtain th e specified bac k fill materi a l from local suppliers . Staff recom- mends gran.ting of the time extension of 37 calendar days . There i s no in c r eased cost in the original contract amount . . No . 9 -g -Acceptance of Job No. PW -046. Th e contract for ·the demolition of the metering vau l ts and t he abandoned shop at Plant No . 1 is complete and the contractor has complied with all conditions of the contract . The staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda material , authorizing the filing of a Notice of Completion . No. 9 -h(l) -Approval of Addenda Nos . 1 and 2 to Contract No. P2 -8 -8, Brookhurst Street Improvements . · These addenda are to change two bi~ items inclu~ed in the portion of work to be paid by the City of Huntington Beach for the installat ion of street lights. Originally it was contem- plated that this item would be included in the contract, but the City has requested that it be deleted . They will make separ ate · arrangements with the Edison Comp any for the. installation of the requir e d street lighting facilities . No . 9-h(2) -Awarding Contract No . P2-8-8, Brookhurst Street Improvements. Bids for thi s construction project were received on April 6th . Twelve bids were received ranging from a low of $14 1,441 .10 to a high of $162 ,653,95 , The engineer's estimate for this project was $214,955.32 . T he Directors will recall that in the appr oval of th e plans and specifications, the City of Huntington Beach include d in this contract catch b as in s , storm drains and sidewalks for which the City agreed to b e responsi ble . The Districts ' share of this contract is $111,790 .35 and th e City 's obligation is $29,6 50 .75 . (Th e Districts ' budge t is $165 ,000). It is the staff 1 s recommendation that the award be made to Fleming Co nstru c tion Company of Cerritos . Included in the resolution awarding the con - tract a re the provisions for approving the project and directing the filing of a Notice of Determination as re quired in the Cali - fornia Environmental Quality Act . -3- . , No. 9-1 -Amending Proc ed ures for Collection of Delinquent Obli gations. . . . Th e Director of Finance and Ge neral Couns e l are recommending . that procedur e s adopted by th~ Boards in November;, l97 5, f.or the . . colle~tion of delinquent obligations · owing to the Districts be · ' amended to ·pr ovide ·added authority to .write off uncollec tab le account~ after a ssi g nment or court .judgment .· ¢urrent ~olicy ~llows .·· · writ ·e~off of uncollectable debts of less than $25 . Debts between '. $25 and $500 are assigned for c~li ect ion 6r small cl~ims cour~ action . ·uncollectable accounts in exc ess of ·$500 a r e referred to · ·the Gen e ral Counsel who <reviews and. submits a recomm endation to the ·Boards for appropriate action. The res olution includ ed .wi t h the a genda material reenacts the existing provisions and add s · author ity for write -off of uncollect a bl e acco unt s betwe en $2 5 · and $500 when collection attempts are unsuccessful or inappropriat e . No. 9 -j -Am endin g Regulations Governing Relo cation As sis tance and Real Property Acqu isition s . Duri ng the rece~t sessi o n ~f 1975 legislature, Government Code Secti on 72 6 7 was amended to expressly exempt public agencies fr om the requirements of adhering to the r elocat ion assistance guide -· lines and requirements when acquiring ari easement right o f way or ~ther n on-possessory inter es ts in real e3 tate for the con3truction , ma inte nance or replacement of sewers , water lines and their r el~ted appurt e nances. The General Counsel h as reviewed this enactment and recommends that ti:ie Di.str:iicts ' re gu l a tions governing r e loc a - t ion assistan ce and real property acquisitions be .amended to-J:>-rovide for this change in the Code .· District Ho . 1 No. 9 -k -Auth oriz ing Solicitation of Engineering Proposals to Prepare Right -of-Way Mapp_ing . Fr om time to time , the staff has discovered substantial dis - crepanc ies in the descriptions of the Districts ' sewer easements . Because of numerous inquiries by othe r agencies regarding t he Districts ' right of way and t h e numb er of easements c rossing private proper ty, we believe we shou l d engage the services of a reliabl e firm to r e vi ew the status of a ll existing easements . I t is the staff 's recomm e ndat ion that author i zation be g iv en to solicit engineering proposals to update the District 's r i ght -of-way mapping . It i s estimated that the c ost for these outside consulting services will be appro ximate ly $2 ,0 00 . No . 9 -1 -Au t horizing Negotiation f or Engineering Design Services for Raitt Street Trunk . At th e March 1 9th Board meetin g , the Dir ectors received a l etter fr om the Ci ty of Santa Ana , requesting the District to -Li- proceed with the design and construction of the Raitt St r eet Trunk to acco~.modate proposed developments in the southe rly part of the City of Santa Ana . At the February meeting, the ·Boards adopted · a po l icy for the Select ion of Professional Engi neering Services . Included in that po licy was a provisi on that when a consulting engineer has satisfactorily completed one phase in the d~velopment of a project , and th e Board determines ·it mi ght be in the best interest td retain this firm for sub - sequent phases of th e work, then the Selection Committee can proc eed directly with the negotiations for compensation with the consultant . This provision is ·particularly true when a firm has completed a Master Plan Report and is familiar with similar projects in the District . I t is, therefore; rec ommended that the staff be authorized to negotiate directly with Boyle Engineering Corporation to prepare the plans and specifications for thi s project . This proj ect should be expedited because of the very favorable bids being submitted by contrac tors on other sewer construction for othe r Districts . Di strict No . 3 No. 9 -m -Approving Ch a n ge Order No . 2 to Contract No . 3 -21 -1 . Du ring t h e connection of the gravity sewer portion of this contract to the Westside Pumping Station, excavation revealed a major conflict between the gravi ty s~wer and the force main from the pump station . Portions of the force main had to be relocated to accommodate the gravity sewer t o the pumping station . The contractor was ordered under the contract force account provisions to remove and relocate a portion of the force main prior to in- stallation of the contract gravity sewer . $6,300 of this change order is for restriping and sandblasting required by the City of Los Alamitos as a resu lt of revised traffic detour patterns . The staff recommends approval of this change order . No . 9-n -Change Order No . 3 to Contract No . 3 -2 1-1 . Ch ange Order No. 3 is an adjustment in the engineer 's qu antities . This change order ref l ects the actual work performed by the con- tractor and adjusts the final contract amount for t he q uantities of work as set f orth in the contract . Th e adjustment of quantities deducts $7 ,000 from the original bid quantities based on the engineer 's estimate . No . 9-o -Accepting Contract No . 3-21 -1 as Complete . The con tractor, Tutor-Saliba Company, has completed Reaches 25, 26 , and .a portion of 27 of the Westside Re lief Interceptor through portions of the Cities of Seal Beach and Los Alamitos . Both cities , as well as Bixby Ranch, the majo r private property -5- ~-·.6wner affected by this project, have submitted correspondence statinK that the Contractor has complied with all of thei~ . requirements . · The staff recommends acceptance of the work as complete. · · · · · · .. ·' N~. ·9...:.p -Acceptance of Sewer Easement for Co:iitrac t No ·. 3-:9 .: ' Thi s act10n appearing on your ag~n-da auth.oriz ·e -~ ~cceptci.nce . of · a sewer easement in the vicinity of Orangethorpe and ··.Thomas ·. · Streets · in the City o.f Buena Park... Th.i .s is .·property .. formerly . owned by · Cal Trans .and sold to abutting property owners . A· . . . -·property owner has consented to dedicate . this sewer ·easement ,·. wh ich is adjacent to the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way, at no c9st to the District to include our exi ~tin g· facility, as ·well as additional right of way in the event ·that a future reli~f sewer is required. The staff r ecommends acceptance of this Grant Deed. District No. 5 No. 9-q -Approving First Amended Joi nt Exercise of Powers ·A reement Creating Newport -Irvine Waste -Management Planning Agency NIWA The NIWA Planning Agency· has requested that the District approve a revi sion to the First Amended Joint Ex~rcise of Powers· Agreement. ··The staff recommends adoption of Res_olution No .. 76-78-5. . . District No . f;i . •. No. 9-r -Authorizing Solicitation of Engineering Proposals t6 Prepar e Right-of-W ay Mapping. From time to time, the staff has dis~ov~red s~bstantial dis- crepancies in the descriptions of the District 's sewer easements . Because of numerous inquiries by other agencies regarding the District 's ri ght of way and the number of easements crossing private property , we believe we should engage the services of a reliable firm to review the status of all existing easements . It is the staff 's recommendation that authorizati.on be given to solicit engineering proposals to update the District's right-of -. way mapping. It i s estimated that the cost for these outside consult ing services will be approximately $5,000 . District No . 7 No. 9-s -Approval of Addendum No. 1 to Contract No . 7-6-9 . This add,endum was issued to clarj_fy location of certain under- ground utilities as wel l as the extent o f a buried concrete pave - ment which was questioned by prospective bidders prior to receipt -6- of bids. This addendum also clarified the connection to that portion of the Tustin Orange Relief Sewer built and currently owned by the City of Orange. No. 9-t -Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Easement -Cowan Heights Area. In the development of an individual lot on Circula Panorama in the Cowan Heights area, the property owner was required to extend the public sewer in an undedicated portion of the st reet. Acceptance of this Grant of Easement, which lies in the future street right of way, is recommended. No. 9-u -Request for Annexation. The District has received a request from the Warmington Company to annex approximate ly 22 acres of proper ty located in the City of Orange , known as Tract No. 8745. This tract lies northerly of Chapman Avenue and easterly of Santiago Boulevard. It is recommended that this matter be referred to the staff for study and report back to the Board. Nos. 11 and 12 -Report of the Executive Committee. The Committee met on March 30th and enclosed for the Directors is a written report of their discussions and recommended items for consideration by the Boards. No. 13 -Report of the Building Committe e . The Building Committee met also on March 30th , and enclosed for the Directors is a written r eport of their discussions and recommended items for consideration by the Boards. No. 14 -Selection Committee Report. The Selection Committee has met on two occasions to discuss the selection of an engineering firm for design of 75 mgd Activated Sludge Treatme nt Fac ilities at Plant No . 2. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report of their discussions and actions for consideration by the Boards. No. 15 -Public Employees Retirement System. Enclosed is a report by the General Counsel, recommending adoption of Resolution No. 76-62, declaring intent to depool from the Public Employees Retirement System funding pool and providing one-year final compensation basis for retirement benefits. 7- No. 1 6 -JPL-ACTS Pilot Plant Facilities. The ·staff will .ma~e a slide pres~ntaiion an~. bfiefly review the stat~s · of this project·, detailing sorne of the constructi.on proQedures em~loyed in ·con s t~ucting this 1 mgd facility in less than six months. Messrs . Jack Rh et t and Hal Cghill fro~ the Environmental Protection .Agency Headquarteri? I'.ecently vi.sited ·the facility and were impr essed with the Districts.'· effot'ts;. · ~he ·racil i t~ is preseritly in operation and·results are ~ched~ied ~or -publication in $ept~mber·ot this year . · · Pursuant ·to the letter dated Mar~h 4th fr6m JPL~ it·. i s th~ : . Staff I S recomm enda ti On th a t the maximum aITloU n t . for Service S to provid e for the startup and operational phase of toe pilot plant facility be increased fr om · $280 ,000 to $333,726 . · · No. 17 -Resolution Establ ishing Permit Fee s for Class I Dischar gers for Industrial Waste Ordinanc e .. The Industrial Waste Ordinance which will become effective July 1st of this year , provides that the Di rec tors must estab lis h .. :•. by resolution the processing fee for a Class I permit. The Class I industrial discharge rs ·are the major industries in the County ·whi ch will dischar ge volumes in excess of 50,000 ga llons per day, or dis- charge wastewaters which ha~e a strength (50 %) greater than domes tic sewage or discharging components that are considered toxic and/or incompatible with the Districts ' sewerage system .. The Class I Pe r mit i s issued for a period not to· exceed three ye~.rs . , , It is ·the staff's recommendat ion that th e · Boards establish a $50 processing fee for Clas s I Permits . This $5 0 fee is for pro - cessing only and is in addition to the fee s established in the Ordinan ce f or excessive quantity or quali t y discharges . No . 18 -Consideration of Ac'tions Re : Rem.lest ·from Orange Cou n ty Vector Control (Mosquito Abatement) District . We are considering entering into a cooperative effort with the Vector Control District to produce mosqui to fish in ponds they will build on some presently unused land at th e northeast corner of Plant No. 1. The costs to our Districts will be minimal, con- sisting of furnishin g secondary treated water from our Plant water system at the rate of about 30 gpm. All work will be done by the Vector Control District with the provisions that in the event we require this land for our Districts ' u se , they will restore the site to its present condition. -8 - . ~ • A t I No. 19 -HMO Medical Plan with Security Health Plan (SHP). On , March 1, 1976, the Districts entered into an agreement with the SHP to provide prepaid medical insurance for our employees . We have been experiencing considerable difficulty in obtaining proper medical services as stipulated in our agreement. The staff wishes to discuss this with the Board and re ceive emergency authority in the event the SHP becomes u nable to 'supply medical services to our employees. I District No . 1 No. 22 -Adjournment to 5:00 p.m ., April 21 , 1976. In the event the Boards authorize the Selection Committee (Agenda I tem No. 14) to negotiate with an engineering firm to provid ~ design services for the 75 mgd activated treatment facili ties at Plant No . 2, it is requested that the District No. 1 ~oard adjourn to the above ho ur and date for the purpose of awarding a contract if the negotiations are successful. District No. 3 No. 31 -Awarding Contract No . 3-21-2, Portion of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 and 29, Westside Relief Interceptor. On April 6th, bids were received for this Master Planned Tr unk Sewer project which ranged from a low of $1,177,745 to a high of $1 ,809,454 . Eight bids were received with the low bid being submitted by B & P Construction Company of Los Ange l es . The engineer's estimate for this project was $1 ,182,289 . It is recommended that the Board accept the l ow bid submitted by B & P Construction Company of Los Angeles in the amount of $1,177,745. No. 32 -Authorization to Award Contract for Manhole Rep l acement. Plans and specifications have been completed for the replace- ment of two manholes on the Los Alamitos Subtrunk near the Westside Pumping Station. Since the existing manholes are badly deteriorated and the replacement should be done as soon as possible to avoid a potential failure, it is recommended that the General Man a ger be authorized to award the contract to the lowest bidder in an amount not to exceed $15 ,000. District No . 7 No. 35 -Bids for this project , the Tusti n -Orange Relief Sewer extending from the intersection of Santiago Boulevard and Spring Boulevard to the intersection of Santiago Canyon Road and Linda Vista Street , were received on Tuesday , March 30th . A tabul ation -9- of 22 bids received is included wi th the agenda material. Bidding wa s excellent and very comp etitive on this project in asmu~h as .20 of the 22 bidders were below the engineer's ·estima te. Bids ranged from a low of $295 ,826 .40 to a high of $461,4 36 .00. It is recommended that the award be made to Sully-Miller Contracting Company of Long Beach in the amount of $295 )82~.4 0 . 'The engineer 's estimate for this proj e ct was -$440,312. ' . No . 36 Comp e nsation and Reimbursement Policy f or Directors. At the March ·Joint Board meeting , the Directors instructed the staff to place this item on the agenda for this meeting . District No. 2 No. 39 -Proposed Annexation of Tract No . 7350. For the past three years, the District 's staff has corres- ponded with the City of Villa Park, attempting to annex an area which was developed as a subdivision in 1973 and annexed to the City at that time . Through an over sight, the property was never annex ed to District No. 2 , and now the .area contains 19 separate parcels with individua l owners/occupants . Th e City has submitted a letter stating that this property was inadvertently not annexed to District No . 2 at the time of development and is requesting that thi s l0.8679 acres be annexed to the District and that the City pay one-ha lf o f the annexation f ees which we re in effect at ·the time of d e velopment. It is the staff 's recommendatio n th at the Board accept the City 's offer and proceed with an inhabited annexation . This wi ll require a District Board pu bli c hearing . I f less than 25% of the residents obj e ct to the annexation , the District can proc e ed through the Local Agency Formation Commission . The actions appearing on the agenda establish the conditions of an n exation and applicable mo nthly charges in the event the annexation fa i ls . -10- Fr ed A. Harper General Manager RE: AG ENDA ITEM #4 To date we h ave received communications reflecting the following appointments: (*M ayor) CIT Y DISTRICT ACTIVE ALTERNATE Brea 2 Donald L. Fox Carol D. Weddle* FILE ················-3 Sam Cooper Carol D. Weddle* LETTER ·······-····· Buena Pa rk 3 Stanley F. Meyer Jesse M. Davis* A/C •••• TKLR •••• Fullerton 2 Frances Wood Robert E. Ward* -----~ ......................... 3 Robert E. Ward * Frances Wood ....... -................... Irvine 7 David G. Sills\~John H. Burton La Habra 2 Robin Young* Beth Graham 3 Charles Stevens, Jr. Robin Young* La Palma 3 Henry Frese* Alan Pri est Yorba Li nda 2 Henry w. Wedaa * Anton M. Groot ., -·-- l .... II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE APRIL 14~ 1976 -7:30 P.M. Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA AOJOURiiMENTS PuSiEDJ/' COViP & t:!LEAGE ... ~ .... " f;•_::s S'::T UP ..... ~ ........ p;::s : ~-· .. ~::s CERT;FiED .. ~ L~~; ~1-L:: :: ~.'. :n flli1 .............. , r~1:1'WTES hi(!ll i:.i(.. .. k..~ THE JO I NT CHA I RMAN HAS REQUESTED THAT ANY DI RECTOR MINUTES ~ILED ......•• ~­ WI TH A QUESTION ON CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS OR ANY OTHER AGENDA ITEM PLEASE CONTACT THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE .DEPARTMENT HEAD FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PRIOR TO THE MEETING, (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts re seating of new Directors. .See &wppleme:AUl ~gend~ (5) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: FILE ··············-- LETTER ·······-··-~)s District 1 March 10, 1976 regular AJC •... TKLR •••• -· .. --·····--·-······· tf'\l~ District 2 March 10, 1976 regular ~\.S District 3 March 10, 1976 regular ~\5 District 5 March 10, 1976 regular . .\l\.l !> District 6 March IO, 1976 regular 6'\.lS District 7 March 10, 1976 regular J.\ IS District 8 January 14, 1976 regular ~IS District 11 March 10, 1976 regular (6) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: ~ (a) Joint Chairman FILE ················- LETTER ·······-···- "A/C •••• TKLR •••• (b) General Manager ·-······--····-·········· (c) General Counsel ----·--····· ] (7) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of Joint RO LL CALL VOTE ..... w......-Op era ting Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fu nd claims. See page "A" (8) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of roll call vote motion by each of the following Districts ratifying payment of claims of the respective Districts: ROLL CALL .VOTE DI ST RICT NO. 2 See page "B-1" ROLL CA LL VOTE .... _ DISTRICT NO. 3 See page "B-1" ROLL CALL VOTE .. , __ DISTRICT NO. 5 See page "B-1" ROLL CALL VOTE ... -·~-DISTRICT NO. 7 See page "B-2" (9) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS I 9 (A) THROUGH 9 ( u ) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discuss ion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the con sent calendar s hall be considered in the regular order of business . Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the r~~0 • • ,ndar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state address and designate by letter the item to be THE STAFF HAS REQUESTED THAT 1 the consent calendar . AGEN DA IT EM #9 (n) BE REMOVED. N\\S Ro!I Call Vote or Cast Una nimous Ballo t * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Ch airman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. g (~) Consideration of action to approve a ll agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- (9) (CO NSENT CALE NDAR continued from page 2) FILE ----·- LETIE~J$.Jc.' A/C ••• ~KL R ••.• ' . v/' f llE ................. . LETIER .....•..•..... A/C ••.• TKLR •... ( \ .-vJ -.---·-·-·-·.-.· .s-.f l --··-~-!. ..... FILE ................ .. LETIER •..••.••••• ,,. A/C •••• TKLR •••• · FI LE •...............•. LETTE R ······---~·-··' A/C ••.. TKL R ..•• ~~~-=-~-r --··-··-··::t;;::'~ ' -~d -~.:W.:-r FILE •....•.•...••••.•• LETTER ···-········· A/C •.•• TK LR •••• FILE ..•.....••......•. LETTE R .••...••..•.•• A/C •••• TKLR •••• FILE ···········-··-· LETTER ···-········· A/C ••.. TKL R .••• FILE ••••.•.••.•..•.••• LETTE RSY.:". .• ·-····· ~~-~~:~.:~V' ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion authorizing sale of obsolete NCR accounting equipment to Turner Data Systems, Inc. as follows: NCR-400 Accounting Machine NCR-3300 Accounting Machine $125.00 25.00 (b) Consideration of actions re purchase of 650 horsepower, dual fuel, gas engines, Specification No. E-079, for rehabilitation of Rothrock Outfall Booster Station: (1) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to advertise for purchase of three new engines for Rothrock Booster Station (2) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to negotiate with P & S Repair Service, Ft. Worth, Texas, for purchase of two used engines for Rothrock Booster Station conforming to Specification No. E-079 (in lieu of two new engines under (1) above), a nd authorizing the General Manager to award a purchase order contract for said engines in a total amount not to exceed $56,000 each ·plus tax and freight (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-54, approving and authorizing execution of agreement to transfer the Districts' interest in 12 KV 3-Phase Power Line between Plants Nos. 1 and 2 to the Southern California Edison Company, for consideration of $11,500 and the condition that Southern California Edison Company provide emergency and standby capabilities to the District. See page "C" (d) Consideration of motion granting a one-half step increase to Districts' Associate Engineer, Nick DiBenedetto, from Range 59B, Step 3 ($1583/mo.) to Step 3.5 tI.627/mo.) in recognition of achieving his engineer's regi s tration (e) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment a t Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No . Pl-16, authorizing a deduction of $30,000 from the contract with Donovan Construction Company due to a change from ebullient cooling system to jacket water coo ling. See page "D" (f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Demolition of Meter Vaults and Shop at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-046, granting a .time e xtension of 37 calendar days to the contract with E & G Contractors, Inc. for delays in obtaining backfill material. See page "E" (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-55, accepting Demolition of Meter Vaults and Shop at Reclamation Plant No. 1, J ~b No. PW-046, as complete; authorizing ex e cution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page · "F 11 · (CONSE NT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- ) (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) FILE· --··-····· .. -ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) lffiER ············- A/C •... TKl R ·-· \...fll El .. ~ ..... . s~,-:r.~ ... . A/C .... TKLR ...• ~*-~~-~.~--... ~v w:,T·I V ~s- ~-.-·7··· .. .. FI LE ................. . lffiER A/C ••.• TKlR •.•• ~-·••04 •••••u••••••UOA FILE •.............•.•. LETTER ·······-····· A/C ••.• TKLR .••• ----·······-·-····· G~~~~···~··· LETTER lgLk--- A/C .•.. TKLR ••.• --................. ~ ........ ... ~E l~6 LETTE R ~E..l.; .... A/C •... TKLR .•.. FILE ................ .. LETTE R •.. ~·······­ A/C .... TKLR ••• FILE •.••..••••••...••• LmER ···--········ A/C ••.• TKLR ...• (h) (1) Consideration of motion approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications for Brookhurst Street Improvements in the City of Huntington Beach, Job No. P2-8-8 (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-56, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Brookhurst Street Improvements in the City of Huntington Beach, Job No. P2-8-8, to Fleming Construction, in the amo unt of $141,441.10. See pages "G" and "H" (i) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-57, amending procedures for the collection of delinquent obligations owing to the Districts and repealing Resolution No. 75-145. See page "I" (j) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-58, amendi ng regulations governing relocation assistance and real property acquisitions, as recommended by the General Counsel. See page 11 J 11 DISTRICT 1 (k) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit engineering proposals for preparation of right-of-way document maps and records for the District's trunk sewer facilities (1) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to negotiate an engineering fee with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of Raitt Street Trunk Sewer · · DISTRICT 3 (m) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Westside Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 & Portion of 27, Contract No. 3-21-1, authorizing an addition of $18,336.81 to the contract with A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Company, for additional work to install new techite force main and for traffic control measures requested by the Cities of Los Alamitos and Seal Beach; and granting a time extension of 69 calendar days to accomplish said work. See · page . "K" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications fo r Westside Relief I nterceptor, Reaches 25, 26 & Portion of 27, Contract No . 3-21-1, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $±6~888;88 from the contract with A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Company. See page __ "_L_" __ (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (9) (CONSENT CALE NDAR continued from page 4) EI LE -················ LETTE ~--~······ A/C ••.• TKL R ••.• __ fa·-~·-···-~.::::-. ~-~:~;;:.Q C§"r"°ER'!.;-;;~ A/C .•.. TKL R ...• _s>_g_~ .. P .. ~. FILE •.••.•............ ~~---··· A/C __ .TKL R ...• -•U••••••••••••oooooouo G!?'~~ LETTER ~'.t.k A/C •••• TKLR .... FILE ................. . LETTER .•............ A/C •... TKLR .. -··~··············· G!LE --~·-········ LETTE R •...•• ~ C •••• TKLR .•.• 0).. ~ Q_..., ( v ~E ................. . LETT ER ...•.......... ""' A/C ~- DISTRICT 3 (Continued) (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-74-3, accepting Westside Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 & 27, Contract No . 3-21-1, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement . See page "M" (p) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-75-3, authorizing acceptance of Grant of Easement from John L. Molinaro, et al. for a permanent easement in connection with construction of the Magnolia Relief Sewer, Contract No. 3-9, at no cost to the District. See page "N" DISTRICT 5 (q) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-78-5, approving and authorizing execution of revised First Amended Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency (NIWA). See page "0" DISTRICT 6 (r) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit engineering proposals for preparation of right-of-way document maps and records for the District's trunk sewer facilities DISTRICT 7 (s) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 and 16 (From Spring Street to Linda Vista Street), Contract No. 7-6-9 (t) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-79-7, authorizing acceptance of Grant of Easement from Julia Ann Hyde, for a permanent easement for offsite sewer service in connection with the sewer line in Circula Panorama in the Cowan Heights area, at no cost to the Di strict . See page "P" (u) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from The Warmington Company for annexation of approximately 22 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Chapman Avenue and the proposed extension··of Crawford Canyon Road, and refer . "Q" to staff for study and reconunendat~on. See p age END OF CONSENT CALENDAR -5- (10) ALL DISTRICTS (ll) fl'\ 1:, Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report (12) .ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: IYl.)~~Consideration of Resolution No. 76-59, authorizing the General FILE •••• ~.......... Manager to execute an agreement, · in form approved by the General LEnER t.\\\\ .. ~!>11 Call Vote or Cast Counsel, with Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Unanimous Ballot • • • 208 A · d Pl · f h S h C A we .... TKLR .... · to part1c1pate 1n reaw1 e ann1ng or t e out oast rea, .:~~.:................ subject to specified conditions (See report mailed with agenda material) ~--··•·•••••••••••••n• (b) FILE ................. . Consideration of motion approving Amendment No. 1 to Agreement for Employment of General Counsel, providing for an extension of said agreement for an indefinite term beginning May 1, 1976, subject to 30-day cancellation by either party, and authorizing the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1 to execute said r_0reR tL_.f(\) S A/C ••.. TKLR ... : amendment. See page "R" =E~-lJ.i' N\}@> Consideration of Resolution No. 76-60, declaring intent to assist A/C .... TKLR ··Roll Call Vote or Cast the Air Resources Board re development and implementation of an ---··············· unanimous Ballot air quality maintenance plan covering the South Coast Air Basin. See page "S" -~------···-·····--· ~ ::.E···········~ ALL DISTRICTS R ····---~ Report and recommendation of the Building Committee re Administrative A/C .... TKLR •••• and Engineering Facility Study (See report mailed with agenda material) ----........................... ... --·······-····-(14) ALL DISTRICTS FILE ............•..... LETTER A/C •••. TKLR .... ------·-······--··-·· Consideration of recommendation of Selection Committee re Employment of Engineering Firm for Design of 75 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at.Plant No. 2 (See report mailed with agenda material) /'· ~~~:::9of motion to convene in executive session~:..;.:::;----.................................... .. (b) Consideration of motion to reconvene in regular session 0 3 7 ";:" ... v.:'.'.... . @cons~deration of R~solut~on No. 76-~~horizi~g th~ Sel~ction Conunittee to negotiate with ~··'=~ ~ngineering firm for LETTER ........... Roll Call Vote or Cast design of 75 MGD Activated ScigeTreatent Facilities at Plant A/C ..•. TKLR ····Unanimous Ballot No. 2, in accordance with adopted District procedures; and ---·-················· authorizing District No. 1 to award contract for said work. --··········-········· See page "T" ~~ _ A\.-0 (15) FILE ................. . LETTER J~Y A/C ·---~11 .. ~all Vote or Cast , , r \:,,. ~n3 · us Ballot "~'.; . '"';>-.. ·--~-----.. -~·-·············· "'11 s ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Public Employees Retirement System standard Resolution No. 76-62, declaring intent to depool from the State funding pool and providing one-year final compensation basis for retirement benefits, preliminary to transferring from PERS to County Retirement System (Form of resolution to be provided by PERS) See page "U" -6- ·. (16) ALL DISTRICTS FILE ................ .. LETTER .. :_.,···--·~a) A/C-~ (b) Staff progress report on JPL-ACTS Pilot Plant facility ~~ ~~ FILE -··-·····--·- lETIER -------------- A/C .... TKlR ___ _ --u ............... . Consideration of amen dment to contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration re JPL-ACTS process (1) ff\\ s Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Jet Propulsion Laboratory, dated March 4, 1976, requesting amendment to contract with NASA re JPL-ACTS process . See p age "V" --·-·····---··"-----@ ::~E~-;----------~ M \ ~ Considerat ion of Resolution No. 76-61, authorizing amendment to the contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration re JPL-ACTS process, increasing the ma ximum amo unt for services from $280,000 to $333,726 to provide for startup and operational phase . See ~--~oll Call Vote or Cast A/C .... TKl R ----Unan imous Ball ot /L.W ~ n.~. f\ -. ._ ----~~ Q .D . JI r.0 . .r\.11.,,a--/ -..._..,·-·---··-page "W" FILE~-'-~ lEnER -------~--·· ( 1 7) EACH DISTRICT A/C ____ TKlR ---· Consideration by each respective District of the following resolutions establishing $50 Cl ass I Permit Fee effective July 1, 1976, as provided in Section 302.5 of the respective District 's Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities: See page "X" ff\ \..S Roll Call Vole or Cast Unanimous Ballot (a) DISTRICT 1 Resolution No . 76-64-1 Ml~ I S \3 M\6 Jn.Is ,t\ /:> " (b) " (c) " (d) " (e) " (f) II (g) DISTRICT 2 Resolution No . 76 -65 -2 DISTRICT 3 Resolution No . 76 -66-3 DISTRICT 5 Resolution No. 76-67-5 DISTRICT 6 Resolution No. 76-68-6 DISTRICT 7 Resoluti on No . 76-69-7 DISTRICT 11 Resolution No. 76-70-11 (18) ALL DISTRICTS FILE -------·-·-···-·-· lETIE R ·--·-··--····· A/C .... iKLR ···· -------··············Ml s (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Orange County Vector Control District , dated March 31, 1976, requesting site at Reclamation Plant No. 1 for pilot production of mosquitofish See page "Y" ®--~------~ (b) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to enter into an agreement in form approved by the General Counsel with LETIE R .......... ,.,. A/C .... TKlR .... M '--t;__ ~~-~-~-~--\\ ~ /'::!!..~ Orange County Vector Control District, providing a site for production of mosquitofish on District property for a period of up to three and one -half years, provided, however, that Vector Control District · vacate the site if the property is required by the Sanitation District (19) ALL DISTRICTS FILE -···--------- LffiER ·-·-········-l $ A/C •... TKl R .... ff\ Verbal report on Districts' HMO prepaid medica l insurance plan with Security Health Plan and cons ideration of motion granting emergency authority for the General Manager to negotiate an agree ment with another provider in the event Se curity Health Pl an i s unable to deliver services of their plan . -7- (20) (21) Fl LE ••••••••••·••••••• I.ETTER ~--··········· (22) AJC •.•. TKlR •••• -·········-··- ALL DISTRICTS DISTRICT 1 · Consideration of motion to adjourn to 5:00 p.m., April 21, 1976 q·.t.Js- --······-··-··-(23) DIST (24) (25) (26) . (27) (28) (29) (30) (31) FILE ••••.••••••••••••• ~~~-Vote or Cast ~~liiii1mous Ballot A/C •... TKlR .... \ . -~-·---~ ft\ 5 (32) "-LETI'ER ···-Roll··CalJ Vote or Cast A/C .... TKtRUn~nimous Ballot ~?../~s __<i2.A1 ... ~ ~~E\... (33) FILE ···········-··- lEnER ~--····- (34) A/C .... TKLR .•.. ( 35) r ··'·-~---·· ~ --··-····.fmlLC.all Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot -___,...-......-- DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn q: 4 5 DISTRICT 6 emental agenda items, if any DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn/C/:t./5 al agenda items, if any DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion to adjourn 'f:q~ DISTRICT 11 0th~ commun1~Bi or~lemental agendi items, if any DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn q: t~ DISTRICT 3 Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-76-3, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Westside Relief Interceptor, Portion of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 & 29, Contract No. 3-21-2, to B & P Construction Company, in the amount of $1,177,745.00 See page "Z" DISTRICT 3 Consideration of Resolution No. 76-77-3, authorizing the General Manager to award and execute a contract in form approved by.the General Counsel for Manhole Replacement, Los Alamitos Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 3-8R-1, to the lowest responsible bidder in an amount not to exceed $15,000.See page "AA" items, if any DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn q ! 41 DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-80-7, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Tustin- Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 & 16 (From Spring Street to Linda Vista Street), Contract No. 7-6-9, to Sully-Miller Contracting Company, in the amount of $295, 826. 40. See page "BB" -8- , . (36) DISTRICT 7· .. ..-c 11 v t c t Consideration of Resolution No. 76-81-7, establishing the compensation r\t.,.. ·····-··--ilv11 a o e or as , unanimous Ballot and expense reimbursement policies for its Directors, and repealing .LE.,._..·············· N\}S Resolutions Nos. 73-53-7 and 76-52-7. See page "CC" A/C •.•. TKLR •••• I ---············ (37) ---·--·-········· (38) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn C/:f g (39) FILE ••..•..•.••••••••• DISTRICT 2 LETTER ,?............ (a) A/C ••.. TKLR •••• f'v\. \ £, (b) A\S C_b--e) (c) Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot fill: -···••••'."".""'. '.ci 1,.V/ ER ...•• t. ... ~~.j ·.' (d) ~ -Alt .... ll(tl ·:.·:Roll Call Vote or Cast ~-~;:'. .. -~iJ.J.f:.~ Unanimous Ballot ---·········· (e) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from City of Villa Park,· dated March 30, 1976, relative to annexation of Tract No. 7350. See page "DD" Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report, dated April 7, 1976, regarding annexation of Tract No. 7350 within the City of Villa Park to County Sanitation District No. 2. See page "EE" Consideration of Resolution No. 76-71-2, declaring special exception for Tract No. 7350 and waiving connection fees therefor. See page "FF" Consideration of Resolution No. 76-72-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 10.868 acres to the District in the vicinity of Santiago Boulevard and Patrician Drive, and setting annexation fees therefor in the amount of $214.00 per acre (Proposed Annexation No. 13 -Tract No. 7350 to County Sanitation District No. 2) See page "GG" Consideration of motion declaring intent to levy sewer service charge in the amount of $10 per unit per month against developed properties in Tract No. 7350 if proposed Annexation No. 13 - Tract No. 7350 is not completed ( 40) DISTRICT 2 Othet::bllisiness and camlfttl1ffCation~upplemental ag@nda items, if any (41) DISTRICT 2 j Consideration of motion to adjourn tf'. 'f S -9- RE: AGENDA ITEM #4 To date we have received communications reflecting the following appointments: (*Mayor) CITY DISTRICT ACTIVE ALTERNATE Brea 2 Donald L. Fox Carol D. Weddle* 3 Sam Cooper Carol D. Weddle* Buena Park 3 Stanley F. Meyer Jesse M. Davis* Fullerton 2 Frances Wood Robert E. Ward* 3 Robert E. Ward* Frances Wood Irvine 7 David G. Sills* John H. Burton La Habra 2 Robin Young* Beth Graham 3 Charles Stevens, Jr. Robin Young* La Palma 3 Henry Frese* Alan Priest Yorba Linda 2 Henry w. Wedaa* Anton M. Groot II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 l 0844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: of Orange County, California (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) JOINT ·BOARDS Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE APRIL 14J 1976 -7:30 P.M. THE JOINT CHAIRMAN HAS REQUESTED THAT ANY DIRECTOR WITH A QUESTION ON CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS OR ANY OTHER AGENDA ITEM PLEASE CONTACT THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE .DEPARTMENT HEAD FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PRIOR TO THE MEETING. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation· ~j Roll Call ~-1-' ,l~h.' ( Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary / ti l~ Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts re seating of new Directors. See supplemental agenda EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 District 2 District 3 District 5 District 6 District 7 District 8 District 11 March 10, 1976 regular March 10, 1976 regular March 10, 1976 regular March 10, 1976 regular March 10, 1976 regular March 10, 1976 regular January 14, 1976 regular March 10, 1976 regular ' 1'~ . . vfj'll . I" G ~·.r. l.c " • )' "', -_. / . . ; .· f~~:-•' ALL DISTRICTS -;I J '. ~ ·; , 1; ·/ \ . 1.. Reports of: ¥-l ) (a) Joint Chairman l• r' ' (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel ' 'J.. C(1 :,.,/ I ' ,· ·. (7) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of ro ll call vote motion ratifying payment of Joint ROLL CALL VOTE ..... u·~-Op er at i ng Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund claims . S~e page "A" (8) EACH DISTR I CT Consideration of roll call vote motion by each of the fo llowing Districts ratifying payment of claims of the respective Districts: ROLL CAL L .VOTE DI STR ICT NO. 2 See page "B-1" ROL L CALL .vorE •••• _ DISTRICT NO. 3 See page "B-1" ROLL CALL VOTE ... -DISTRICT NO. s See page "B-1" ROLL CALL VOTE ... _._ DISTRICT NO. 7 See page "B -2" (9) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS I 9 (A) THROUGH 9 ( u ) All matters p l aced upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent cal endar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there wi l l be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regul a r order of business . Members consent of the public who wish to remove an item from the calendar shal l , upon recognition by the chair, state ~~~~address and designate by letter the item to be THE STAFF HAS REQUESTED THAT AGENDA ITEM #9(n) BE REMOVED. the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Roll Call Vo te or Ca s t Unanimous Ballo t Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent ca l endar not specifically removed from same . -2- ·, (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) I . 1 A · , .. I/' i, ~'.., r f). ·~ . \ \ , ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion authorizing sale of obsolete NCR accounting equipment to Turner Data Systems, Inc. as follows: NCR-400 Accounting Machine NCR-3300 Accounting Machine $125.00 25.00 (b) Consideration of actions re purchase of 650 horsepower, dual fuel, gas engines, Specification No. E-079, for rehabilitation of Rothrock Outfall Booster Station: (1) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to advertise for purchase of three new engines for Rothrock Booster Station (2) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to negotiate with P & S Repair Service, Ft. Worth, Texas, for purchase of two used engines for Rothrock Booster Station conforming to Specification No. E-079 (in lieu of two new engines under (1) above), and authorizing the General Manager to award a purchase order contract for said engines in a.total amount not to exceed $56,000 each plus tax and freight (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-54, approving and authorizing execution of agreement to transfer the Districts' interest in 12 KV 3-Phase Power Line between Plants Nos. 1 and 2 to the Southern California Edison Company, for consideration of $11,500 and the condition that Southern California Edison Company provide emergency and standby capabilities to the District. See page "C" (d) Consideration of motion granting a one-half step increase to Districts' Associate Engineer, Nick DiBenedetto, from Range 59B, Step 3 ($1583/mo.) to Step 3.5 (1627/mo.) in recognition of achieving his engineer's registration (e) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-16, authorizing a deduction of $30,000 from the contract with Donovan Construction Company due to a change from ebullient cooling system to jacket water cooling. See page "D" (f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Demolition of Meter Vaults and Shop at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-046, granting a .time extension of 37 calendar days to the contract with E & G Contractors, Inc. for delays in obtaining backfill material. See page "E" (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-55, accepting Demolition of Meter Vaults and Shop at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-046, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page ~-"-F_"~--- (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- r ' ,. \, . I ~) - ' ' J, · •. ' 'l, \ '· (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (h) (1) Consideration of motion approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications for Brookhurst Street Improvements in the City of Huntington Beach, Job No. P2-8-8 (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-56, to receive and file bid tabulation and reconunendation, and awarding contract for Brookhurst Street Improvements in the City of Huntington Beach, Job No. P2-8-8, to Fleming Construction, in the amount of $141,441.10. See pages "G" and "H" (i) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-57, amending procedures for the collection of delinquent obligations owing to the Districts and repealing Resolution No. 75-145. See page "I" (j) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-58, amending regulations governing relocation assistance and real property acquisitions, as recommended by the General Counsel. See page "J" DISTRICT 1 (k) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit engineering proposals for preparation of right-of-way document maps and records for the District's trunk sewer facilities (1) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to negotiate an engineering fee with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of Raitt Street Trunk Sewer DISTRICT 3 (m) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Westside Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 & Portion of 27, Contract No. 3-21-1, authorizing an addition of $18,336.81 to the contract with A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Company, for additional work to install new techite force main and for traffic control measures requested by the Cities of Los Alamitos and Seal Beach; and granting a time extension of 69 calendar days to accomplish said work. See· page "K" (n) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Westside Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 & Portion of 27, Contract No. 3-21-1, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $1~~888;88 from the contract with A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Company. See page "L" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- ' ' ';} .. r' If \ ( r I (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) I ; i i ( I DISTRICT 3 (Continued) (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-74-3, accepting Westside Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 & 27, Contract No. 3-21-1, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "M" (p) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-75-3, authorizing acceptance of Grant of Easement from John L. Molinaro, et al. for a permanent easement in connection with construction of the Magnolia Relief Sewer, Contract No. 3-9, at no cost to the District. See page "N" DISTRICT 5 (q) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-78-5, approving and authorizing execution of revised First Amended Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency (NIWA). See page "0" DISTRICT 6 (r) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit engineering proposals for preparation of right-of-way document maps and records for the District's trunk sewer facilities DISTRICT 7 (s) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 and 16 .(From Spring Street to Linda Vista Street), Contract No. 7-6-9 (t) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-79-7, authorizing acceptance of Grant of Easement from Julia Ann Hyde, for a permanent easement for offsite sewer service in connection with the sewer line in Circula Panorama in the Cowan Heights area, at no cost to the District. See page "P" (u) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from The Warmington Company for annexation of approximately 22 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Chapman Avenue and the proposed extension-·of Crawford Canyon 'Road, and refer . "Q" to staff for study and recommendation. See page ~~~~- END OF CONSENT CALENDAR -5- (. ~ L (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any (11) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report (12) .ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-59, authorizing the General Manager to execute an agreement, ·in form approved by the General Counsel, with Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot to participate in 208 Areawide Planning for the South Coast Area, subject to specified conditions (See report mailed with agenda material) (b) Consideration of motion approving Amendment No. 1 to Agreement for Employment of General Counsel, providing for an extension of said agreement for an indefinite term beginning May 1, 1976, subject to 30-day cancellation by either party, and authorizing the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1 to execute said amendment. See page "R" (c) Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot Consideration of Resolution No. 76-60, declaring intent to assist the Air Resources Board re development and implementation of an air quality maintenance plan covering the South Coast Air Basin. (13) (14) See page "S" ALL DISTRICTS Report and recommendation of the Building Committee re Administrative and Engineering Facility Study (See report mailed with agenda material) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of recommendation of Selection Committee re Employment of Engineering Firm for Design of 75 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Plant No. 2 (See report mailed wit·h agenda material) (a) Consideration of motion to convene in executive session (b) Consideration of motion to reconvene in regular session "' '·t ·{ (c) Cons~deration of R7solut~on ~f· ,7~-6~, raq.tho:izi:ig th7 Sel7ction Committee to negotiate with : ~/, r. -)/ lf.L{. 4'•'..V-engineering firm for Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot design of 75 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Plant No. 2, in accordance with adopted District procedures; and ( ~~~h~:~:ing ~~;,trict ~ob~orc::~rd con~ra~t' ,fo~Lsa[~~e1o~k~ _J,,.• ALL ~~~~~T~,.. ''0 .;;.x;:,,,,,, "f \,) .• L, .. c!~J :;o,q( 1"'ctx> 7 L (15) 711_1 \'\)l 1 -...J Roll Call Vote or Cast Consideration of Public Employees Retirement System standard Resolution No. 76-62, declaring intent to depool from the State funding pool and providing one-year final compensation basis for retirement benefits, preliminary to transferring from PERS to County Retirement System Ur.3nimous Ballot (Form of resolution to be provided by PERS) See page "U" -6- (16) ALL DISTRICTS Staff progress report on JPL-ACTS Pilot Plant facility Consideration of amendment to contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration re JPL-ACTS process (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Jet Propulsion Laboratory, dated March 4, 1976, requesting amendment to contract with NASA re JPL-ACTS process. See page 11 V11 (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-61, authorizing amendment to the contract with the National Aeronautics Roll Call Vote or Cast and Space Administration re JPL-ACTS process, increasing Unanimous Ballot the maximum amount for services from $280, 000 to $333, 726 to provide for startup and operational phase. See page "W 11 (17) EACH DISTRICT Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot II II II II II II (18) Consideration by each respective District of the following resolutions establishing $50 Class I Permit Fee effective July 1, 1976, as provided in Section 302.5 of the respective District's Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities: See page 11 X" (a) DISTRICT 1 Resolution No. 76-64-1 (b) DISTRICT 2 Resolution No. 76-65-2 (c) DISTRICT 3 Resolution No. 76-66-3 (d) DISTRICT 5 Resolution No. 76-67-5 (e) DISTRICT 6 Resolution No. 76-68-6 (f) DISTRICT 7 Resolution No. 76-69-7 (g) DISTRICT 11 Resolution No. 76-70-11 ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Orange County Vector Control District, dated March 31, 1976, requesting site at Reclamation Plant No. 1 for pilot production of mosquitofish See page 11 Y11 I ""I,. ()J/J e / r c·..J (b) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to enter into an agreement in form approved by the General Counsel with Orange County Vector Control District, providing a site for production of mosquitofish on District property for a period of up to three and one-half years, provided, however, that Vector Control District \ IJ \ . .• t-.~, .. •• .. .. . ,~ (19) vacate the site if the property is required by the. Sanitation District ALL DISTRICTS Verbal report on Districts' HMO prepaid medical insurance plan with Security Health Plan and consideration of motion granting emergency authority for the General Manager to negotiate an agreement with another provider in the event Security Health Plan is unable to deliver services of their plan. -7- (20) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22) DISTRICT 1 · Consideration of motion to adjourn to 5:00 p.m., April 21, 1976 q;{? (23) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn q ~./fl (25) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn q-. <f 1 (27) DISTRICT 8 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (28) (29) DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion to adjourn . ,IJ q ' ~1 , {/ : ~ ·' ~ i .f_ I . ,,, ' 1 · •J ~ DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 11 .l~ Consideration of motion to adjourn q.T (31) DISTRICT 3 ~ \ Roll Call Vote or Cast ·J 1 Unanimous Ballot Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-76-3, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Westside Relief Interceptor, Portion of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 & 29, Contract 1 No. 3-21-2, to B & P Construction Company, in the amount of $1,177,745.00 See page "z" (32) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of Resolution No. 76-77-3, authorizing the General Manager Roll Call Vote or Cast to award and execute a contract in form approved by the General Counsel Unanimous Ballot for Manhole Replacement, Los Alamitos Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 3-8R-1, to the lowest responsible bidder in an amount not to exceed $15, 000.See page "AA" (33) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (34) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn 1)1 (35) DISTRICT 7 -..,,., ·-l'J Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-80-7, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Tustin- Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 & 16 (From Spring Street to Linda Vista Street), Contract No. 7-6-9, to Sully-Miller ·-Roil Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot Contracting Company, in the amount of $295, 826. 40. See page "BB" -8- ' . (36) DISTRICT 7 ell Vt Ct Consideration of Resolution No. 76-81-7, establishing the compensation Roll a o e or as d . b · · · · d unanimous Ballot an expense reim ursement policies for its Directors, an repealing Resolutions Nos. 73-53-7 and 76-52-7. See page "CC" (37) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (38) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (39)_ DISTRICT 2 (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from City of Villa Park, dated March 30, 1976, relative to annexation of Tract No. 7 350. See page "DD" (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report, dated April 7, 1976, regarding annexation of Tract No. 7350 within the City of Villa Park to County Sanitation District No. 2. See page "EE" (c) Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot Consideration of Resolution No. 76-71-2, declaring special exception for Tract No. 7350 and waiving connection fees therefor. See page "FF" (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-72-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 10.868 acres to the District Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot in the vicinity of Santiago Boulevard and Patrician Drive, and setting annexation fees therefor in the amount of $214.00 per acre (Proposed Annexation No. 13 -Tract No. 7350 to County Sanitation District No. 2) See page "GG" (e) Consideration of motion declaring intent to levy sewer service charge in the amount of $10 per unit per month against developed properties in Tract No. 7350 if proposed Annexation No. 13 - Tract No. 7350 is not completed (40) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (41) DISTRICT 2 . . ,r Consideration of motion to adjourn f ,~ D -9- .- .. ... . . . . ~· . . . . . . . .. ' . . ,. . .; . . . . . . ' . . : • .1 ••. •• • ~ • · · RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMEN.T_S;. .· ·· . ~ ~· . . . ,.APR IL 1 LJ .I 197 6 -7 : 3 0 p I M I . • '-TARRANT NO. JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCH .30, 1976 IN FAVOR OF 29222· 20223 : 1 24 29225 29226 29227 .. 29228 29229 29230 29231 29232 29233 29234 29235 .29236 29237 29238 29239 29240 29241 29242 29243 29244 29245 29246 29247 29248 ·29249 29250 29251 29252 29253 29254 29255 29256 29257 29258 29259 .29260 29261 29262 29263 29264 29265 29266 29267 29268 29269 29270 29271 29272 "'273 ~274 29275 29276 29277 "A-1" Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies, Tools & Valves $ Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Equipment Rental ·Hurley Electronics, Inc., Electric Supplies Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Freight Jensen Instrument Company, Controls Kenics Corporation, Polymer Mixer King Bearing~ Inc., Bearings & V-Belts Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies Knox .Industrial Supplies, Hardware LB1i1S, Ine., Welding Supplies, Tools & Equipment Repair L & N Uniforms Supply Co., Uniform Service Judy Lee, Employee Mileage Metermaster, Inc~, Equipment Repair. Morgan Equipment Company, Equipment Parts National Chemsearch, Cleaner City of Newport Beach, Water Office Equipment Specialists, Equipment Repair Orange County Farm Supply Co., Weed Killer Orange County Stamp Co., Rubber Stamps Oreo Plastics, Plexiglass Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies Pacific Telephone Company M. C. Patten Corporation, Gauges Paulsen Wire Rope Corp., Wire Rope Petroleum Dynamics, Compressor Parts Pickwick Paper Products; Janitorial Supplies Printec Corporation, Reproduction Supplies The Republic Supply Co., Pipe Supplies Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Steel Richey Electronics, Inc., Electric Supplies Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts Sand Dollar Business Forms, Printing Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motors & Pur.1p ·Repair Sargent Welch Scientific Co~, JPL Instruments & Lab Supplies Saunders Distributing Co., Inc., Equipment Parts Scientific Products, Lab Supplies Scott Refrigeration Service, Inc., Equipment· Repair Sears, Roebuck and Company, Tools See Optics, Safety Glasses Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Suppl.ies John Sigler, Employee Mileage Signal-Flash Compa1"}y; Barricade Rental Sims Industrial Supply, Sand Blasting Materials Singer Mailing Equipment, Postage Meter Southern California Edison Company Southern California Gas Company Southern California Water Company Sparkletts Drinking Water Corpe, Bottled Water Speed-E-Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Concrete Material, Concrete Standard Oil Company of California, Diesel Fuel, Gas & Oil State Compensation Insurance Fund, Additional Deposit Sterling Art & Engineering Supplies, Drafting Supplies The Suppliers, Hardware, Tools & Chain Thompson Lacquer Company, Patnt Supplies Triangle Steel & Supply Coo, Steel AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT 3,506.18 71.80 303.16 14.85 102.91 500 .40 316.12 210.01 l.!8.92 707.75 1,520.75 -13.65 67.16 94.02 373012 9c00 29.50 97.31 100.56 30.95 102.30 8.62 14 3. 92 406 .. 22 15 .. 58 131.18 . 486. 65 135.00 15.89 76.06 186.76 410 .. 22 623.57 120.85 128.oo 106.07 112.00 166.90 }_4. 05 584.93 57.,00 26.00 90.10 60.42 13,048.69 318.05 3.24 127.11 25.23 197.00 1,480.69 175.00 62.31 928.40 92.11 63.75 11 A-l" WARRANT NO. 29168 29169 29170 29171 29172 29173 29174 29175 29176 . 29177 29178. 29179 29180 29181· JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCH 30, 1976 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Air California, Air Fare, Various Meetings Alex Fish Company, Lab Supplies Allied Supply Company, Valve & Pipe Supplies American Cyanamid Company, Chemical Flocculants American Lock & · Supply, Inc., Hardware . · City of Anaheim, Power Anaheim Sewer Construction, Lateral Repair , The Anchor Packing Co., Gaskets Applied Science Labs," Lab Supplies Bank of America, Bond & Coupon Collection. Beckman Instruments, Instrumentation Supplies Blue Diamond Materials, Concrete Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Magneto Repair State of Calif. Public Employees' Retirement System,. Actuarial Study . .. C & R Reconditioning Company, Pump Repair . " C S Company, Valve & Pump Parts CWPCA, Conference Registration Cal's Cameras, Photo Processing & Supplies Cantrall Corp., Conveyor Parts Century Aero, Electric Supplies Coast Nut & Bolt, Hardware College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials Commercial & C B Communications, Communication Equipment Consolidated Electrical Distbrs., Electric Supplies Continental Chemical Co., Chlorine · F. B. Cook Corp., Manhole Repair Coordinated Equipment Co., CAL/OSHA Testing Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplies 29182 29183 29184 29185 29186 29187 29188 29189 29190 29191 29192 ·29193 29194 29195 .?,9196 29197 29198 .29199 29200 29201 · Daily Pacific Builder, Engineering Proposal Notice Data Supplies & Systems, Inc., Printing . ;·29202 29203 .. :2.9204 29205 29206 29207 29208 29209 29210 29211 29212 29213 29214 29215 29216 29217 29218 29219 29220 29221 II A-2" Nick Di Benedetto, .Employee Mileage The Drawing Board, Office Supplies Eastman, Inc., Of.fice Supplies Electric Supplie·~r, ·Distributing, Electric .supplies Electronic Business Machines, Calculator Engineering News Record, Legal Ad Enterprise Printing Company, Printing Farrow Engineering, Filters Filter Supply Co., Filters Fischer & Porter Company, Me~ering Supplies & Charts Clifford A. Forkert, Right-of-Way Services The Foxboro Company, Electric Supplies General Electric Supply, Electric Supplies General Telephone Company M. E. Gray Co., Pipe Supplies Graybar Electric Co., Electric Supplies Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Parts Hanson Water Works, Pipe Supplies Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal Hewlett Packard, Lab Supplies Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires Honeywell, Inc., Strip Charts House of Batteries, Batteries AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS , . AMOUNT $ 53,oo, ·79·~ 289.21 4,946.35 . 46 .89 :• 115.67 . 475.00· 16.42 ·so ;15 .181.92 71.72 59.32 149.78 294.oo ·150.00 178.93 318.75 133.62 470.23 111.83 229.41 201. '73 63.60 1,647.15 10,839 .. 86 l,235 .. 00 1,335.00 433.01 . 40. 00 280.00 654.04 56.82 26.40 931.67 56.07 68.85 184.50 63.12 1,928.87 23.35 375.29 2,503.87 139-39 197.92 3,549.24 4 33 .14 209.81 21.48 29.87 105 .. 155-~ 108 .1~2 77.09 22.13 "A-2" WABRANT·No. JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCH 30, 1976 IN FAVOR OF 29278 r\g279 ~J280 29281 29282 29283 29284 29285 29286 292t17 29288 29289 29290 29291. 29292 29293 29294 29157 29158 29159 29160 29161 29162 29163 29164 29165 29166 29167 "A-3" Truck & Auto Supply, Truck Parts J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Safety Equipment Union Oil Company of Califor_nia, Gasoline United Parcel Service, Freight-Out _ United States Elevator.Corp .. , Malntenance.Agreement United States Equipment, .Inc., Gaskets VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies Varec, Inc., Compressor Parts Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage Warren a~d Bailey Co., Inc., Tubing . Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts Western Electronic Supply Corp., Electric Supplies Western Salt Company, Salt · Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Supplies· Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Services George Yardley Associates, Metering Supplies TOTAL JOINT OPERATING CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRAN'l1S IN FAVOR OF Almquist Tool & Equipment Coo, Drill Grinder Fairbanks Morse Pump Division, Retention PW-045 Forkert Engineering, Engineering Services P2-8-8 J. B. Gilbert & Associates, Fae. ·Plan & P2-23 EIR- Lowry & Associates, Engro Services, Fae. Plan ·Motorola, Inc., Mobile Radio & Communication Equipment Pepsi Co,, Bldg. Systems,. Inc., JPL Office Rent Southern Calif. Testing Lab., Testing Pl--16 Travel Buffs, Pl-16 Inspection Expense Twining Laboratories, Testing Pl-16 Wyle Laboratories, Pl-16 Consultant TOTAL CORF TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS $ $ $ $ AMOUNT. . 449.97 . 404.81' 44.77 207.49· 33.00 78.97 106.00. 81.31 . '14. 55 .63. 39 816.61 179.67 114.88 490.96 3,827.46 1,554025 93.83 1,348.12 1,474.40 1~18. 38 11,611.91 ~, 350 .. 00 2,871 .. 25 191 .. 86 29.70 354.10 40o00 1,666.oo 24,355.72 98', 114. 94 "A-3" INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCH 30, 1976 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 29146 State of California, Annexation 39.Processing Fee . . ACCUMULATED C1~l)ITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR·OF. 29147· bona~d Cray, Refund Annexation Fee Overpayment FIXED OBLIGATION -.FUND NARR.ANTS IN FAVOR OF · 29148 City of Anaheim, Annual JOS Payment 29149 City of Buena Park, Annual JOS Pa.ytient 29150 City of Fullerton, Annual JOS Pa)'"ffient 29151 Garden Grove Sanitary District, Annual JOS Payment 29152 City of La Habra, Annual JOS Payment 29153 City of Orange, Annual JOS Payment 29154 City of Placentia, Annual JOS Payment 29155 City of Santa Ana, Annual JOS Payment FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 29156 The Register, Bid Notice 7-6-9 "B-1" AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS '-'. AMOUNT 330:00 . .. $ -------- $ > ·$ 167.00 1,561.80 96.70 1,561.80 241. 80 . 386.90 1,474.70 241. 80 4,434.50 $ 10,000.00 $ 102.56 $ 10,599.56 "B-1" INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCH 30, 1976 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY f.'UND WARRANTS ¥1rRRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 29142 Smith Emery Company, Pipe Te~ting 2-14 ... 3, 2-14-4 · DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND'WARHANTS IN FAVOR OF 29143 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-20-2 29144 City of Garden Grove, Pavement Striping 3-20-1 .. , DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 29145 Daily Pilot, Publish Ordinance 509 "B-2" AGENDA ITEM f8 -ALL DISTRICTS $. $ $ $ AMOUNT 2,132.00 229.91 2,270.84 2,500.75 69·.33 "B-2 11 II c II RESOLUTION NO. 76-54 AlJTJJORI ZING TRANSFER OF INTEREST IN INTER-PLANT POWER LINES TO EDISON COMPANY A RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, _5, 6, 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALffORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT TO TRANS-. FER DISTRICTS' INTEH.EST IN INTER-PLANT POWER LINES TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY .. * * *· * * * . * * * * : ' 1ne Boards of Directors of County Sanitation· Districts Nos. 1, .2, 3, 5, · 6, 7 and 11,of Orange County California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND O~DER: Sectioi1 1. That certain agreement dated , by and between ~~~~~~~~- County Sanitation District'No. 1· of Orange County and Southern California Edison • Company, wherein the Districts' interest in 12KV 3-phase power lines between Plm1ts Nos. 1 and 2 is transferred to the Southern California.Edison Company, is hereby ·approved and accepted; and, .Section 2. TI1at said transfer is subject to payment to the Districts in ·the amount of $11,S00.90 ~nd ~h~ provision that S;uthern California Edison Company will, at no cost the Districts, maintain temporary systems for Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2 for emergency standby capabilities in the event of power failure; and, Section 3. TI1at the Chairman and the Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitatfon Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED ni Tcgular meeting held April 14, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #9(c) -ALL DISTRICTS II c II COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P • 0 c l3 0 X 8 1 2 7 -1 0 8 '-• 4 E LL I S AVE NU E FO~NTAIN VALiEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE-ORDER C.O. NO~ 6 --~~~~~~~-------c'<:'1'rfRACTOR: Donov~n Construction Company of Miilncsotn April 5, 1976 - . JOB: ·46-MGD Activated Sludge Plant at Reclamation Pl~mt No. 1 -Job No. Pl-16 -·Amount of this Change Order .Wx~~) _(DEDUCT) '. $ 30, 000.00 I~ accordance with cbntract pfovisions, th~ followin~ chnnges in the contract and/or contract \>Jork are hereby ·authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions fr6m the contract price are hereby appr~vedo Reference: Contractor's letter dated March 19, 1975. DEDUCf: Revise cooling systems for DeLaval blower engines from ebullient cooling to jacket water cooling TOT AL DEDUCT No time extension this change order .. Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change {Jrn})) (DE DUCT) Amended Contrc:ict Price Board authorizotion diJtc: April 14, 19'76 Approved: . $30,000.00 $ 29,876,000.00 (14,005.14) 30,000.00 $ 29, 831, 994. 86 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California Consulting Engineer Cy·------------------ By ----~----·-------~~~--~--~~-Chic f [n9ineL:r ContrJctor "D" AGENDA ITEM #9(E) -ALL DISTRICTS "D" COUNTY J/\N I I/\ l l UN lJ ! ~» I IU \..,I:, Vt· u i{/\l\lu t: \,VUl'-4 1 l · P. o. nox 812/ ~-108 1+t+ ELLIS /\VENUE FOUNTAIN VAL~EY, ~ALifORNIA 92708 CHl\t~GE ORDER C.O. N0·--~-1~----~~~ :".:ONTRACTOR: E & G Contractors, Inc. DATE-. April 1, 1976 ·~ ~~--~~~~~~~~---~-- :oB: Demolition of Meter Vaults· and Shop at Rccl<lr.intion Plant No. 1, -Job No. PW-0'16 Amount of th! s Chongc Order (ADD) . (DEDUCT) $ o. oo· I~ accordance with contract provisions, the f~llowing changes in the contract~and/or ~6ntract work are hereby authorized and as compensation thcref~r, the foll~1ing additions to or .::ieductions from the contract price arc he_rcby.upproyedo , · Extensibn of Contract Time The contractor is hereby· granted an extension of contract tiwe for delays in obtaining backfi 11 n!aterial, inclement weather and undisclosed utilities and underground obstnictions. Sununary of Contract Time Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this Change Orde1 .. Total Time Extension Revised Contract TiEe Revised Completion Date TITTAL TIME EXTENSION .• . 37 Calendar Days 37 Calendar Days December 25, 1975 60 Calendar Days ·FehYuary 23, 1976 37 Calendar Days 37 Calendar Days . 9 7 Calendar Days March 31, 1976 -- Original Contract Price $ 12,845.00 Prev. /\uth. Changes $' o.oo This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 0.00 Amended Contr2ct Price $ 12,8~5.00 App roved: ::a~20976 COUNTY SA!~IT!\TION DISTRICTS OF • 0 rarige County, Cu 1 i fo rn i () ~~-?~-.?' Co11~;ult.in9 L119i11ccr '> !(L~-/ _,/ ~ , 'f r~ y . , c. /0 . ,. '-.,, . ""C' . ----------Contractor "Eu AGENDA ITEM #9(F) -ALL DISTRICTS I/ E II ~ .... "F"' 1u.:;:,ULUJ JUN NU. /l>-;.J.:> . ·ACCEPTING JOB NO. PW-046 AS cmtPLETE A RESOLUTION OF '11IE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS .. ·1, 2, 3, ·s, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,' ACCEPTING JOB·NO. PW-046 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FI~AL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT- * * * '* * * . .,.._ * * * •* 'D1e Boards of Directors of· Cotinty-Sanitation District·s Nos. 1, 2,. 3, S ;· 6, 7 and .11·· of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DE'l~ERMINE AND ORDER: .Section 1. That the contractor, E.& G Contractors, Inc., has completed the:. project in accordance with the terms of the contract.for DtMOLITION OF METER VAULTS AND SHOP AT RECLAMATION ·~LANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-046, on. the 31st day of March, 1976; and, Section 2. That by letter, the Chief Engineer of the Districts·has recommended acceptance of said work as havin_g been completed in accordance with the terms of the.contract, which. said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Demolition· .of Meter Vaults and Shop at Reclamatl.on Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-046, ·is hereby' accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 25th of December, 1975; and, Section 4. 1nat the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with E & G Contractors, Inc., setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Demolition of Meter Vaults and Shop at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-046, is hereby approved; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at ~ regular meeting held April 14, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #9CG) -ALL DISTRICTS Ii F II II G II RESOLUTION NO. 76-56 AWMmmG CONTRACT FOR .JOl3 NO. P2-8-8 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TllE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR BROOKHURST STREET IMPROVEMENTS IN Tl~E CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, JOB NO. P2-8-8 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Th~ Boards ·of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the project for Brookhurst Street Improvements in the City of Huntington Beach, Job No. P2-8-8, is hereby approved and the Secretary be directed to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with the Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Clifford A. Forkert, Districts' engineer, and concurred in by the Districts' Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to FLEMING CONSTRUCTION for BROOKHURST STREET IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH~ JOB NO. P2-8-8, and the bid tabulation and the proposal for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That the contract for said Job No. P2-8-8 be awarded to Fleming Construction in the total amount of $141,441.10, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and the Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself .and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to ~1e provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 5. TI1at all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #9(H)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS II G II .Engineer's Estimate: $214,955.32 B I D TABULATION S H E E T Date April 6, 1976 11:00 A.M • Contract For: . BROOK!IURST STREET IMPROVEMENTS IN nm CITY OF HUNTINGfON BEACH JOB NO. P2-8-8 CONTRACTOR 1. Fleming Construction Cerritos 2. Sully Miller Contracting Company Orange 3. Continental Grading & Paving, Inc. Costa Mesa 4. Certified General Engineering Contractors, Inc. Orange 5 .. United Asphalt Co.~ Inc. Paramount 6. Clarke Construction Company Compton 7.Griffith Company Irvine 8.Blair Paving, Inc. Ne\ .. 1)0rt Beach 9.c. W. Poss, !nc. lluntington Beach lQ:;.ilvcri & Ruiz Construction Cmnp~my Fullerton 11. McGrew Construction Company, Inc. Santa Ana, California TOTAL BID $141,441.10 $145 ,,425~ OS $146,676.48 $146,900.45 $149,910.13 $150,224.15 $152,813.55 $154,969.02 $155,753.59 $159,385.23 $159, 428 .11 "H-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(H)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "11-1" BID TABULATION SHEET Da te~ril 6; 1976 -11·: 00 Contract For: BROOKJIUHST STREET IMPfWVEHENTS, JOB NO. P2-8-S-~--. . ·continued ...... . 12. 13. 14. 15 . . 16. 17. -i 8. 19. 21. 22 • . . • .... //IJ 2" n- CONTRACTOR J. B. Crosby Co. · Orange, California· '. • • •J • I• • ; I ... . ' AGENDA ITEM #9(H)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS TOTAL BID $162,653.95 '· "H-2" "I-1" HESOLUT~ON NO. 76-57 . : A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY· SANITATION DISTRICTS' 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11. OF ORANGE COUNTY, _CA~1IFORNIA, AMENDING PROCEDURES FOR THE COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT OB~IGATIONS OWING TO THE DISTRICTS AND. REP~ALING RESOLUTION NO. 75-145. WHEREAS, in the course of conducting_ the ·business affairs of. the Districts, certain accounts recei vabl.e become delinquent and, in fact, uncollectable; and WHEREAS, the costs incurred by the Districts in attempting collection of delinquent accounts receivable can exceed the amounts recovered; ·and \'ffiEREAS, costs and.efficiency can be greatly improved by the adoption of certain policie~ relating to the collection of accounts. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanita- tion Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY DETERMINE, RESOLVE.AND ORDER: Section 1. The Finance Director is authorized to write off as an uncollectable debt any delinquent obligation owing to the Districts in excess of ninety (90) days and not exceeding the sum of Twenty-five Dollars ($25.00). Section 2. The Finance Director is authorized to assign for collection to a person or firm of his choosing, any delinquent AGENDA ITEM #9(1) -ALL DISTRICTS "I-1" "l-2" obligation owing to the Districts in excess of ninety (90) days and not exceeding the sum of Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00). Ninety (90) days after assigning the obligation for collection, the Finance Director is authorized to write off as an uncollectable ~ebt, any portion of the obligation which is still outstanding . . Section 3. The Finance Director is authorized to file the necessary proceedings in the Small Claims Court of the respective judicial district of the County of Orange in order to collect any delinquent obligation owing to the Districts in excess of ninety (90) .days and not exceeding the sum of ~ive Hundred Dollars ($500.00). Upon obtaining a judgment in favor of the Districts, the Finance Director and General Counsel shall take all legal measures necessary to enforce the terms of the judgment. Ninety (90) days after receiving a final judg- ment in favor of the Districts, the Finance Director is authoriz'ed to write off as an uncollectable debt, any portion of the obligation which is still outstanding. Section 4. In addition to the above, the Finance Director shall forward any delinquent obligation in excess of Five.Hundred Dollars ($500.00) to the General Counsel for the Districts who shall submit his recommendation to the Boards of Directors as to the method of collection of said account. Section 5. In addition to the above authorizations, the Finance Director is directed to exercise all available -2- AGENDA ITEM #9(1) -ALL DISTRICTS "I-2" "I-3" lawful methods to insure prompt and full recovery. of all obligations owing to the Districts. Section 6. The Finance Director is authorized to offset against any sums held on deposit by the Districts on behalf of ~ny person who owes a delinquent obligation to the Districts. Section 7. The Finance Director is authorized to withhold the app~oval of any permits otherwise to be issued by the Districts to any person who has an outstanding debt obligation owing to the Districts until such time as said debt obligation is paid in full. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #9(1) -ALL DISTRICTS "I-3" II J II RESOLUTION NO. 76-58 . AMENDING RECULATIONS COVEHNINC; l<ELOCATION -----------· ---------· ASSISTANCE /\ND IU:AL PIW!>EJffY ACQUTSJTIONS A. RESOLUTION OF 11-IE BOARDS or DTH.ECTORS OF, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUN1Y; CALIFORNIA, AMENDING REGULATIONS GOVERNING RELOCATION ASSISTANCE AND REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 74-61 . . * * * * * * * *· * * WHEREAS, County Sanitation Dist.ric·ts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6"~ 7 and 11 have heretofor adopted Re~olut~on ·No. 74-61, Establishini Regulations Gqvern~ng Relocatipn Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions; anda WHEREAS, Government Code Section 7267 has been amended to expressly exempt public agericies from the requi~ement of adhering io the rclocaiion assistance . . guidelines and requirements whe'n acquiring an easement right of way or other non-possessory interests in real estate for the construct~on, maintenance or replacement of sewers, wate~ lines and their related a~purtenances. NOW, TIIEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,. 7 and 11 of Orange County, C~lifornia, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER: Section 1. That Section 7.2 of the Districts' regulations governing relocation assistance and real property acquisitions be amended by the addition of subsection (d) as follows: "(d) The requirements of subsection (a) shall not be applicable where the District seeks to acquire easement, right of way, covenant or other non-possessory interest in real property for subsurface sewers, water lines or appurtenances, drains, septic tanks, or storm water drains, in that pursuant to California Government Code Section 7267, appraisal is not required prior to the initiation of negotiations." PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1976. .. AGENDA ITEM #9(J) -ALL DISTRICTS II j II COUNTY SANITATION-DI~TRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER ::ONJRl\CTOR: A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. ·& N. M. Saliba Company JOB: Westside Relief Interc.£E._tor, Reaches 25, 26 fr Portion of 27, ContrL"tct No •. 3-21-1 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (v~m.~~~) $ 18,336.81 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the controct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are her~by approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's letter of March 29, 1976. ADD: A. Exploratory excavation to determine true location of existing 20" techite force main B. c. D .. Remove existing 20" force main and ins tall new 20" techite force main. In order to install 39" VCP a? per plans. Install .new PVC vent line from pump station to existing manhole. Traffic striping, buttons, traffic control and sandblasting for control of tra£fi~. '(This is in addition to that required by the contract and was req~csted by the Ci tics of Seal Beach and Los Alamitos after construction was started.) Extension of Contract Time The contractor is hereby granted nn extension of contract tin:c for the above mentioned additional work TOT AL ADD: Tar AL THm E)..'TEl~SI ON "l<-1" AGENDA IJEM #9(M) -.DISTRICT 3 1,911.02 7,999.16 2,126.63 6,300.00 $18, 336. 81 69 Ca] cnchr I~s "1<-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P • 0 • 0 0 X 8 1 2 7 -1 0 8 Lt t+ E L L I S AV EN U E FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. N0. ___ 2 ______ ~~----- :oNTRACTOR: A. G. Tutor Co.; Inc. & N. M. Saliba Company April 1, 1976 .:OB: Westside Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 & Portion of 27, Contract No. 3-21-1 Sumrr.ar{ of Contract Tin:e Original Contract Date ·original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time ~eviscd Completion Date June 26, 19 75 210 Calendar Days . January 22, 1976 69 Calendar Days · 69 Calendar Days 279 Calendar Days March 31, 19 76 Original Controct Price $ 1,416,448.00 '-11'- Prev. Auth. Changes $ ____ 11~,_4_66_._14~~--- . Th Is Change (ADD) C\)'EX)'tl\...,-) $ 18, 336. 81 --------~~~~---- Amended Contract Price $1,446,250.95 Board·authorization date: April 14, 1976 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Onmgc County, California "-11" By-------------------------~~~~~~---Conslllting Engineer I. By---------------------------~- By ________ ·-------------------·----~~~--Chief Engineer "K-2" AG END~0t1ttf{ V/9 (M) -DISTRICT 3 "K-2" '-""' ·. .COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P • 0 • £3 0 X 8 1 2 7 -1 0 8l1 l+ E LL I S AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE.ORDER . ~ CONTRACTOR: A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. · M. Sriliha Company DATE ___ ~~-A_p_r_i_l~l~1 _1_9_7_6 __ ~~~- . . J0[3: Westside Relief Interceptor, !~caches 25, 26 fr Portfon of 27, Contrnct No. 3-21-1 Amount of this Change Order (¥\'t~) (DEDUCT) $ io,oso~ro In., accordance with contract provisions, the fol lovJiny ·Changes .in the contrLJct andfor contract work are hereby outhorized ar.d as compensation therefor, th,e following addi~ions to or dedoctions from the contract price_ are hereby a~pr~~edo. ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES ADD: Item No. 14 DEDUCT: 6 7 15 16 18 20 Unit V.F. L.F. L. F. ·V~ F. V.F. EAOI c. y. .. Change Est' d Quantities· F~om To 438 442 50 28 48 . 8 174 156 48 32 3 1 30 0 Difference 4 22 40 18 16 2 30 @ 120.00/V.F. Total Add: @ 140.00/L.F~ @ 70.00/L.F. @ 90.00/V.F. .@ G0.00/V.F. @ 300.00/DACll @ 50.00/C.Y. Total Deduct: TOTAL DEDUC.1' 480 ~ 00. 480.00 3,080.00 2,800.00 1,620.00 .960.00 600.00 1,500.~Q_ 10,560.00 $lo, c~o. o~ ~--======================================================================= ~~~- Board.\luthorization dl:ltc: April 14, 1976 Conr,ulting Ln9inccr By ---·---Conti-uct:or Original Contract Price $ 1,416,448.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ __ 2_9_,_e_o_2_. 0_. s __ This Change ~iW~~ (DE DUCT) $ 10,080.00 ----- Amended Contrl)Ct Pr·ice App roved: . COUNTY Sf\N I TAT I ON DISTRICTS 0 F Orc:1ngc County, C.:::i 1 i f:>rn i a Dy ------ II Lii AGENDA ITEM #9(N) -DISTRICT 3 II L" ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-21-1 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF 11IE BOARD OF DI RECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-21-1 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT \ * * * * * * * * * * The Boartl of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California,. DOES.HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Company,· has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 25, 26 AND PORTION OF 27, CONTRACT NO. 3-21-1, on the 31st day of March, 1976; and, Section 2. TI1at by letter, Boyle Engin_eering Corporation, District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the Districts has concurred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and .ordered filed; and, Section 4. 11rnt Westside Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 and Portion of 27, Contract No. 3-21-1, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 26th day of June, 1975; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of District No. 3 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with A. G. Tutor Co., Inc . . and N. M. Saliba Company, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Westside Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 and Portion of 27, Contract No. 3-21-1, is hereby approved; and, Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the .Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement. "M" PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular mectinr, held April 14, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #9Co) -DISTRICT 3 "M" "NII RESOLUTION NO. 76-75-3 .AUTIIORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT or EASEMENT FIWM .JOHN L. MOLINARO, RE CONTRACT N-0. 3-9 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS or COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE ·OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM JOHN L. MOLINARO, ET AL. IN CONNECTION WITH CONTRACT NO. 3-9 * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California,. DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated January 28, 1976, wherein an easement in the vicinity of Orangethorpe Avenue and Thomas Street for sanitary sewer puYposes is granted to County Sanitation District No. 3, is hereby accepted from John L. Molinaro, et al.; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shovm on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said easement is granted in connection with construction of the Magnolia Relief Se~er, Contract No. 3-9; and, Section 4. That said easement is granted at no cost to the District; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #9(r) -DISTRICT 3 II NI! "O" RESOLUTION NO. 76-78-5 APPROVING REVISED FIRST AMENDED .JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING NIWA A RESOLUTION OF 1l-IE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZ- ING EXECUTION OF REVISED FIRST AMENDED JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING ~·NEWPORT-IRVINE WASTE-~1J\NAGEMENT PLANNING AGENCY (NIWA) * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain revised First Amended Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency (NIWA) by and between County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County; Orange County Water District; City of Newport Beach; City of Irvine; Irvine Ranch Water District; County of Orange; Orange County Flood Control District; Orange County Harbors, Beaches and Parks District; Califo~nia Department of Fish and Game; and such other additional entities as are subsequently included therein as member agencies pursuant to the provisions of Section 32 of said agreement, to conduct planni_ng and other studies in ·the San Diego Creek/Ne\vport Bay Watershed area 1 pursuant to Section 208 of the 1972 Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 5 are hereby authorized to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #9(Q) -DISTRICT 5 II O" II P" R~SOLUTION NO. 76-79-7· AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT' . FROM JULIA'ANN HYDE RE OFFSITE -s~WER A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ;, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY; CALIFORNIA,. AUTHORIZING_ ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM JU.LIA ANN HYDE IN CONNECTION WITH OFFSITE SEWER -LINE IN CIRCULA PANORAMA The Board of Directors of CoW1ty Sanitation District No. ·7 of Orang_e · -. County; California, DOES .HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: ·section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated March 3, 1976, wherein an easement in the vi~inity of Ci!cula Panotama ext~nded westerly in the Cowan Heights area for offsi te sewer service is gr_anted to County Sanitation Dis.trict No. 7, is hereby accepted from. Julia Ann Hyde; and_, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted . . . is more particularly described and shown on. Exhibit's "A". and "B", att.ached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said easement is granted at no cost to the District; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be authorized and directed to reco1d said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #9Cr) -DISTRICT 7 II p11 II Q" March 31, 1976 Board Of Directors County Sanitation District #7 Orange County, CA Dear Sirs: THE WAr-llVllNGTON COMPANY 17880 Sky Pari< Circle. Surte 205. :rvrne. C1lif 32"1()7 Telepr.cne (714; 54:J -m_~.: ~- The Warmington Company requests annexation into Sanitation District #7 of approximately 22 acres of property, located in the City of Orange, and known as Tract 8745. Enclosed with this request are the following exhibits as required by Sanitation District 117 procedures: 1. 812 x 13 11 vellum 2. Legal description 3. No persons other than the owner, Mrs. Peay, reside on the property. 4. Check in the amount of $325.00. Thank you very much for your consideration in this matter. Please cont.act me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Walter H. Coursen The Warmington Company WI-IC/mg Enclosures AGENDA ITEM #9(u) -DISTRICT 7 II Q" "R-1" AMENDMENT NO. 1 RE AGREEMENT FOR EMPLOY.MEN'r OF GENERAL COUNSEL THIS AMENDMENT to the certain agreement· dated May 1, · 1976, by and between THOM.AS L. WOODRUFF, hereinafter referred to as "COUNSEL", and COUNTY Sl>.NITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE CODNTY, CALIFORNIA, on behalf of itself and as agent for County Sanitation Distri~ts No~. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 11, hei:einafter referred to as "DISTIUCT", is made and entered into this day of , 1976. WHEREAS, the parties hereto have previously entered into· an agreement whereby DISTRICT employed COUNSEL to serve in the capacity of General Legal Counsel to DISTRICT; and WHEREAS, said agr·eement expires May 1, 197 6; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to amend said agree- ment as mo're particularly set forth herein. · -: NOW, 'l'HEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, it is agreed between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Paragraph G of said agreement is hereby amended to read: 11 6. This agreement shall be for an indefinite term, commencing May 1, 1976, subject to cuncellation b:y either party by giving thirty (30) days written notice. In the event of termination of this agreement by either party, COUNSEL will cooperate with DISTRICT in transferring all files, records and property to the new counsel and COUNSEL will be compensated at the hourly rate set forth in the Agreement for Employment of General Com1sel for any required services performed after the AGENDA ITEM #12(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "R-1" "R-2" ~ffectivc date of termination, incJ.uding the transfer of r{les, records and property." IN WI'J'NESS l·:IJEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this arne.ndment to be executed this 1976. ___ day of COUN'l.'Y SANITJ\'l'ION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ON BEHALF.OF ITSELF AND AS AGENT FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 2, 3, 5, ~, 7, 8 AND 11 By -?.- ---,,,J-.~~l~a-y_n_e_,,S~y~l-v_e_s~t-e-r~~~--~ Secretary Thomas L. Woodruff General Counsel AGENDA ITEM #12(B) -ALL DISTRICTS .. "R-2" RESOLUTION NO~ 76-60 RE AIR QUALITY MAINTENANCE PLAN . A RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SAN_ITA~ION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7. AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; DECLARING INTENT TO ASSIST THE AIR.RESOURCES BOARD RE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTA~I9N OF AN AIR QUALITY MAINTENANCE PLAN COVERING THE SOUTif COAST AIR BASIN * * * * * WHEREAS, it is state policy as a part of the Clean Water Grant program to coordinate Water Quality Planning and construction activities with Air Qua.lity Planning activities, and WHEREAS, Federal Regulations (40 CFR 35.925-14) require that wastewater treatment works funded with federal funds comply with all pertinent requirements of the Clean Air Act and other applicable federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, and WHEREAS, the Environmental Protection Agency in a policy statement to the State,Water Resources Control Boardsta.ted that grant applicants for federal funds are expected to demonstrate that attainment and maintenance of the standards will not be interfered with by the proposed project and the population it serves, and WHEREAS, Orange County is a part of an Air Quality Maintenance Area because of present and projected future air pollution problems, and WHEREAS, the Clean Air Act requires that Air Quality Maintenance Plans be prepared for all air quality maintenance areas, and WHEREAS, the Air Resources Board intends to develop and implement such Air Quality Maintenance Plans within the next 2-1/2 years in cooperation with local government. NOW, TI-IEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED: SECTION 1. That the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, ·s, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County shall render all reasonable assistance including information and "S-1" AGENDA ITEM #12Cc) -ALL DISTRICTS "S-1" data within thei~ statutory authority f6r the devc~oprnc~t and adoption of ap Air :Qu_ali ty Maintcnanc<:! Plan and regulations pursuant thereto covering ·o;ange County. Section· 2.. The_ County Sanitation Districts of Orange County urge Orange County and cities served· by· the Districts' wastewater systems to ·develop an air .qual~ty analysis of their. general plans and to identify·and develop appropriate measures ·to . . . . . mitigate ?etrimental ·air quality impa.cts. Section 3. Upon adoption pf &n Air QualitY~Mairiteriance Plan· and regul~ti6ns ,. puisuant.thereto, the Co~nty Sanitation Districts of Orange County shall ~ender all .. . > reasonable assistance within its statutory authority for the implementation of said Plan. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER RESOLVED: That County Sanitation Districts Nos~ 1, 2,.3, s,· 6, 7 and 11 of Or~nge County, strongly urge the Air Resources Board to expedite completion of said Air Quality Maintenance Plan, as required, in.order that the Sanitation Districts may determine the inter-relationship of the intent of the Clean Air Act as it applies to the Water Pollution Control Acts of the .State and Federal Governments. PASSED A.~D ADOPTED at a regula.r meeting held April 14, 1976. "S-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(c) -ALL DISTRICTS "S-2" ·. "T II l'\I:..JV LU 1 J. VJ~ l'1U • I u-U .:> AUTIIORIZJNG NEGOTIATION AND AWARD OF ENGINEERING CONTRACT FOi{ 75 MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE TREATMENT FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 A .JOINT RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTI-iORIZING THE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE ENGINEERING .CONTRACT FOR DESIGN OF 75 MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE TREATMENT FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 PURSUANT TO ESTABLISHED PROCEDURES AND AUTHORIZING DISTRICT NO. 1 TO AWARD SAID CONTRACT * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, s, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, have heretofor adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures, engineering proposals have been solicited for design of 75 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY.RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Selection Committee established pursuant to Districts' procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural .services, is hereby authorized to negotiate an agreement with ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ connection with design of 75 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Treat- ment Plant No. 2; and, Section 2. That upo~ certification of the final negotiated fee for said services, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized to award a contract for said services; and, Section 3. TI1at the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1 are hereby authorized to execute said contract on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED ~D ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #14Cc) -ALL DISTRICTS "T II LAW OFFICES RICHARD O. f"RAZEE STEPHEN C. STEWART T~iOMAS L. WOODRUFF" JEFFREY A. HARTMAN Stcwd rt, ,\1 oocl ruff & fr<tzCt". · 1055 NORTH MAIN.STREET,.SUITE 1020 SANTA ANA, CALI FO~NIA 92701 • AR CA coot 7'14 835-6212 ~ "U-1" ·April· 1, 1976 .: ...... Boards of Directois . __ ... ·county Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P. o. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 " Subject: Proposed Termination of Co;ntrac.t with P.E.R.s·. As the Directors are aware, they authorized the staff to inves- tigate the feasibility of terminating the existing agreement between the Districts and P.E.R.S., which provides for the employees' retirement system. The basis for this was the request submitted by· the employees' association and a prelim- inary analysis by the Districts staff, indicating that considerable cost savings would be realized by transferring to the Orange County Employees Retirement System. In furtherance of the Board action, the staff has u~dertaken the necessary investigation of the financial aspects concerning the termination of P.E.R.S. and subscribing to the Orange County Employees Retirement System (O.C.E.R.S.). The proposed procedure will be in accordance with a fairly recent provision of the Public Employees Retirement System Act (Governmen~ Code Section 20569) which expressly provides for a transfer from P.E.R.S. to O.C.E.R.S. It is anticipated that if the financial aspects are desirable and cost effective, the transfer would take place on July 1, 1976. This will require considerable efforts by the staff of all parties concerned in order to make it effective at such an early date. We do have indications from all parties, however, that it can be done and, therefore, that date is assumed to be the effective date. We were advised during the course of our meeting with the P.E.R.S. staff that, in view of the present form of partici- pation by the Districts in a conunon pool, it would be necessary to have the Districts take the required action to "de-pool". By following this procedure, P.E.R.S. then would have no doubt AGENDA ITEM #15 -ALL DISTRICTS "U-1" "U-2" Boards of Directors April 7, 1976 P~ge Two that the Districts have specified and identifiable assets. which can be paid over to O.C.E.R.S. at the time of transfer. Therefore, the previous action of the Boards of Directors to pursue the investigation into.the de-pooling now requires the adoption of a resolution of intent which will be followed at the next Board meeting with the actual resolution approving an am.endmen t to the contract.' The Finance Director is pre- paring a separate report which will outline to the Directors the costs aspects of the de-pooling. At the present time, the General Counsel for P.E.R.S. is preparing the first draft of the necessary agreement which will be executed between P.E.R.S., the County Board of Supervisors and the Districts. This agreement is required by law and will set forth the terms and conditions of the transfer, including the amount &nd manner of transferring the assets and liabilities of the Districts to O.C.E.R.S. At the present time, there is concurrence on the part of legal counsel for P.E.R.S., the County and the Districts as to procedures that must be adhered to and there appear to be no difficulties in effecting the transfer, upon the determination by the Districts.that it is economically advantageous. ~~?\~//-' General Counsel TLW:ab cc: Mr. Fred A. Harper Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester AGENDA ITEM #15 -ALL DISTRICTS "U-2" .: Possible Annual Cost Savings to Transfer ·from PERS to OCERS . . . ~ PERS . :Retirement .. OCERS. Depooled Fiscal Year Payroll (a) Rate . (b.) Amount Rate·. (c) Amount 1976-77 $3,054,000 ·7. 96% $243,098 6. 72% $205 '228 .. 1977-78 3, Sf2, 000 8.96 314,675 6. 72 2.36' 006 1978-79 4,039,000 9.96 402,284 6'. 72 271,420 Possible 3-Year Savings ... Possible . Savings $ 37,870 78,669 130,864. $247,403 (a) Based on projection of last actual payroll with allowance for 15% annual increase. (b) Based on new actuarial assumptions, PERS has determined that tl\e employer rate will increase 1% per year for the next three years. (c) OCERS rate includes payment of 1/2 of employee share by employer. OCERS will redetermine their rate in December, 1977 based on new actuarial assumptions and presumably result in a rate increase on or about July 1, 1978. Such an increase is not reflected above. "U-3" AGENDA ITEM #15 -ALL DISTRICTS "U-3" ... a , . JET PH.OPULSION LABORATORY California fostilute of Tcclznol'!g-y • 1800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California 91103 ·. ·, . ~ County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: J. Wayne Sylvester March 4, 197~ Ref.er to: 601-GAT:sw JPL Proposal.No. 51-354B Secretary of the Board of Directors Gentlemen: Subject: Request for Additional Funding Reference: 1) NASA/CSDOC Agreement dated July ·1, 1975 2) NASA/Caltech Contract NAS7-100, Task Order RD-152,. Amendment ~o. 70 The Jet Propulsion Laboratory is providing engineering and technical services to the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) for development of a wastewater activated carbon treatment systems (ACTS) process under referenced agreements. Mr. Ray Lewis, Chief Engineer, CSDOC, in discussions with Mr. Pat Rygh, Project Manager, JPL, has requested that the Laboratory increase its scheduJed manpower support for the startup and operation phase of the l'MGD pilot plant. This phase was rescheduled by CSDOC to begin in February 1976. The increased support to be provided for the startup and operation phase of the project consists of the following: 13.3 manmonths of operations support and engineering evaluation for the operation of the lMGD pilot plant. Three operations crew members will be provided within this support. Telephone 3544321 Tl'lex 6 75421 Twx 9 I 0-588-3294 "V-1" "V-1" AGENDA ITEM #16CB)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "V·-2" JET PHOl'UI..SION LABOHATOHY California Institute of Tccli110/ogy • -1800 Oalt Grove Drive, Pasadena, California 9! JOJ J. W. Sylvester -2-March 4, 1976 5.0 manmonths of laboratory technician support to conduct laboratory tests in support of the lMGD pilot plant operations. 1.4 manmonths of instrumentation technician support for the initial startup of the flash dryer and pyrolysis reactor and to assist on ·an as needed b~sis in further operations. 2.0 manmonths of engineering evaluation for the lMGD pilot plant during the· month of July 1976 is deleted. The use of a NASA-owned laboratory trailer to be located at the site of the lMGD pilot plant for the duration of the project. The manpower and funding requirements to complete the work as revised for February through July 1976 as ·indicated in Figure 1 of Exhibit A of reference 1) agreement are as follows: Feb Mar Apr May June July Manpower MM 7.9 8.2 . 6. 2 6.2 6.2 0 Costs $/K Per Month 30.0 41.1 26.0 25.5 26.0 0 Costs $/K Cumulative 215.1 256.2 282.2 307.6 333.7 The referenced 1) agreement provides for a maximum total cost for performance of services of $280,000. Figure 1 of Exhibit A of reference 1) projects a scheduled expenditure of $259,500. The revised work increases that projection by $74,226, to $333,726. Please refer to cost estimate attached. It is requested that the agreement be amended to increase the maximum total cost for the performance of the additional services by $53,726 from $280,000 to $333, 726. Attachment a/s cc: D. R. Fowler, Caltech R. Lewis,· CSDOC E. F. Morris, NaPO Very truly yours~ C) (; o ;z: , -!-~:· --~ l-t .lGt "<\.. L ({, ~ . . ;_[L <..\: ('-'t-Claude C. Cook, Manager · Contracts Management Office AGENDA ITEM #16(B)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "V-2" "V-3" JPL Proposal No. 51-354B COST ESTIMATE · -FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDS UNDER NASA/CSDOC AGREEMENT 'DATED.JULY 1, 1975 Cost Estimate (February.-. June 1976) Direct Labor (10.4"Qlm) · $ 21~637 Travel _8, 835 Equipment and Documentation 2,150 Procurement (Contract Labor) 13~725 Total Direct $ 46,347 Direct Labor Burden (105.5%) 22,827 General Burden (10.9%) 5,052 Total Costs $ 74,226 Exhibit A Figure 1 Total Costs 259,500 REVISED TOTAL COSTS $33]' 726 AGENDA ITEM #16CB)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS ·" "V-3" "W" RESOLUTION NO. 76-61 AMENDING CONTRACT WITH NASA RE JPL-ACTS PROCESS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION AND AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT WI1ll NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION RE JPL-ACTS PROCESS, TO PROVIDE FOR START-UP AND OPERATIONAL PHASE * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain.amendment dated , to the·contract ~~~~~~~~ by and' between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and County Sanitation District No. 1, authorizing increase in th~ maximum amount for services from $280,000.00 to $333,726.00 to provide for start-up and operational phase of said process, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secreta~y of County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held Ap~il 14, 1976. "'-'' AGENDA ITEM #16(a)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "W" "X" RESOLUTION NO. · ES~fABLISHING CLASS I PERMIT FEES A_RESOLUTION OF THE.BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF· COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ·ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING CLASS I PERMIT FEES PURSUANT TO UNIFORM ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR USE OF DISTRICT SEWE~GE FACILITIES * * * * * * *' * * * WHEREAS, Ordinance No. ,. Establishing Regulations for ·use of Distri~t Sewerage Facilities, has herctofor been adopted by this Board of Directors; and, WHEREAS, said ordinance provides that the Board of Directors shall -adopt the Class I permit fee by resolution. NOW, TI-IEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Class I permit fee provided for under Section 302.S of Ordinance No. is hereby established in the ~mount of $50.00; and, Section 2. That said fee shall become effective July 1, 1976, and remain in effect until changed by resolution of this Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #17 -EACH DISTRICT "XII . ' "-· Orange County Vector Control District DISTRICT OFFICE • 13001 GARDEN GROVE BLVD., GARDEN GROVE, CA 92643 MAILING ADDRESS • P. 0. BOX 87, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 PHONE (AREA CODE 714) 537-5891 · B ·o A R o o 'I" T R u s T E E s -1 t 7 1 PRESIDENT •••• WARREN G. HALL VICE· PRESIDENT , .BETH GRAHAM SECRETARY, , , WILLIAM 5, BROWN·. March 31, 1976 ANAHEIM JOSEf'HINE MORETTI BREA W. LE:O WEST BL!ENA PARK HA"OLD A, flOUllMAN COSTA MESA HANK HORNSVl!LD CYPRESS ALICIE J, f"RANKIEWICH FOUNTAIN VALLEY MA"V!N f', AOLl!R FULLERTON WILLIAM C. STOOKEY GARDF.N GROVE KATHltVN Lo UARR HUNTINGTON BEACH WARltKN co, HALL IRVINE f'ATltlCK L, DARNlllO LAGUNA BEACH f"RANCESS, ENGELHARDT ' LA HABRA D&:TH GRAHAM LA PALMA DAN COLLINS LOS ALAMITOS WILLIAM S, DROWN NEWPORT BEACH LUCILLE KUEHN ORANGE JACK C, HILEMAN PLACENTIA ROD~AT f', LANGER S.AN CL.EMENTE CHARLES f"OX SP.N JUAN CAPISTRANO IAROLD O, COLI!: SANTA ANA W,D.OllARR SEAL BEACH HAROLD K, HOLDl!N STANTON ALIJERT J. NUIJl!:NS TUSTIN RALP'H WP:LBH, JR, VILLA PARK JAMES f'. kl!:ICHERT WESTMINSTER IOV L. Nl!UGE8AUl!R YORBA LINDA CAROLYN Pl!:IRCE l'.WING COUNTY OF ORANGE LEO I'. KOML DISTRICT MANAGER GIL8EltT L, CHALLET "Y-1" William Clark, Superintendent County Sanitation Districts P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. Clark: Since our discussion of March 11, 1976, Gary Reynolds, our Fisheries Biologist, and myself have discussed this proposed project for mosquitofish production in detail and are even more enthused about this project. There are several aspects that make this project for the production of mosquitofish exciting: 1. The low construction costs, which help keep the cost per fish produced low. 2. The Unlimited water supply at no cost. 3. The quality of water, which i_s high in nutrients. This j_s good for the fish.and those organisms upon which they.feed. Also, growth of the unicellular algae in the pond due to these nutrients makes the water soupy looking, hiding the newly hatched fish and providing food for them. This also means that we don't have to buy food to feed the fish. We propose installing a pilot pond to determine the feasibility of this projecto The pilot pond would be 100 feet long,.20 feet wide and three feet deep and would be constructed as near to the water source as possible. We anticipate a June date for stocking fish in the pond so that we may evaluate it over a three month period. This evaluation wofild include production capability of the pond,_ reproduction of the fish, food production by pond, algae production, and temperature profile. It would be helpf'ul if you could supply us with water quality data of the effluent. The ponds would be filled using a hose from the outlet by pond and emptied by pumping. If this pilot pond is successful, then we propose constructing nine of these ponds in total. This would not start until September or October. All construction costs and pond maintenance would be . borne by this District. We would ask that these ponds be available~ to the District for at least three years so that we may properly evaluate them. AGENDA ITEM #18 -ALL DISTRICTS 11 Y-l" Mr. William Clark March 31, 1C)76 Paee -2 Data from other .projects of this type in California indicate that sewage ~ effluent creates an ideal water source for mosqui tofish production. r.I'hese proposed ponds would also fill a gap in our supply of these fish. We are running out of naturally occurring ponds that can produce these fish and "Y-2" we ar_e turning. to alternative sources. This project, using effluent as the water source, should be that successful alternative. This District presently plants 200,000 mosquitofish in over 800 water sources yearly and depends mainly on golf course water hazards for our supply of fish. These are not dependable sources however. If this project is successful, it could create a constant supply of fish for this District at a centralized location which will save us money each year. Thank you for your consideration and if you need more detail, I would be most happy to provide it. truly yours ·~ District Manager GLC/jk AGENDA ITEM #18 -ALL DISTRICTS "Y-2" "Z" Enginecr~s Estimate: $1,182,289.00 B I D TABULATION SHEET Date April 6, 1976 ll:OOA.M.· Contract For: . WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH· 27 AND REACHES 28 AND 29, FROM KATELLA AVENUE & LEXINGI'ON DRIVE TO ·CRESCENT AVENUE . ... 1. 2. 4. 5. 6. 8. 9. -10. 11. . CONTRACT NO. 3-21..:2 CONTRACTOR B & P Construction Company Los Angeles A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Company North Hollywood Tab Construction, Inc. Las Vegas Vito Artukovich & Sons, Inc. South El Monte Matt J. Zaich & Sons, Inc. and John A. Artukovich & Son Sully-Miller Contracting Company Long Beach Risto Construction Company, Inc. Arcadia Mark Dakovich, Inc. Brea AGENDA ITEM #31 -DISTRICT 3 ·TOTAL BID $1,177,745.00 $1, 237 I 026 I 00 $1,387,995.00 $1,388",826.00 $1,414,018.20 $1,462,000.00 $1,699,835.00 $1,809,465.00 "Z II ~··.· .....,,. RESOLUTION. NO. 76-77-3. · AUTI-iORIZING GENERAL MANAGER TO AWARD CONTRACT NO. 3-BR-l A RESOLUTION OF 111E BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTI-IORIZING THE GENERAL MANAGER TO AWARD AND EXECUTE CONTRACT FOR . MANHOLE REPLACEMENT, LOS ALAMITOS SUB-TRUNK, .CONTRACT NO. 3-8R-1 . -The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange .. County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER: Section 1. That the General Manager be authorized to advertise and receive bids for Manhole Replacerne~t, Los Alamitos Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 3-8R-l; and, Section 2. That the General Manager be authorized to award and execute a contract, in form approved by the General Counsel, for said work in an amount not to exceed $15,'ooo.ob. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1976 . II AA" AGENDA ITEM #32 -DISTRICT 3 II AA" Engineer's Estimate $440,~12 B I D TABULATION SHEET Date March 30, 1976 -11: 00 A. M. Contract For: TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, PORTION OF REAOI 14 AND REACHES 15 AND 16# FROM SPRING STREET TO LINDA VISTA STREET CONTRACf NO. 7-6-9 CONTRACTOR 1. Sully-Miller Contrac:ting Company Long Beach 2. Mike Prlich & Son South El Monte 3 • Mike Masonvich Construction Co., Inc. Arcadia 4 • Burch Engineering Construction Baldwin Park 5 • McGuire Construction, Inc. Placentia 6 • Peter Artukovich Construction Co. , Inc. Whittier 7. Vi do Artukovich & Sons, Inc. South El Monte 8. Brkich Bros. Corporation El Monte 9 Colich Bros . • Los Angeles 10.Risto Construction Co., Inc. Arcadia l_ l. B & P Construction Company · Los Angeles "BB-1" AGENDA ITEM #35 -DISTRICT 7 TOTAL BID $295,826.40 $328,382.00 $346,794.00 $359' 5_48. 00 $365,228.40 $367,706.00 $373,397.00 $381,396.00 $383,394.00 $383,946.00 $392,717.00 "BB-1" BID TABULATION SHEET Date March 30, 1976 Contract For: TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. '7-6-9 Continued ..••..•. 12. A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. and · N. M. Saliba Company North Hollywood 13 · A. S. Peich· Pomona . 14. Steve Bubalo Construction Co. Reseda 15 • Bebek Company Irvine 16. Mark Dakovich, Inc. Brea 17 • Rogers & Davies Ontario 18. Charles T. Brown, Inc. San Fernando 19. P.rkacon Co. & Runje Corporation Burbank 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. Guho Corporation Cudahay Lomar Corporation Santa Ana George Miller Construction Company Los Angeles AGENDA ITEM #35 -DISTRICT 7 $398,140.00 $399,807.30 ~ $4.07, 374. 00 $4l0;588.00 $413, 359". 00. $413,659.00 $421,098.00 $427, 011. 00 $428,978.00 $460,342.00 $461,436.00 "DB-2" "CC-1" R~SOLUTION NO. 76-8f-7 ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT FOR EXPENSES FOR DIRECTORS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF. COUNTY SANITATIGN DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, . CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE COMPENSArION. AND EXPENSE ~EIMBURSEMENT POLICIES FOR ITS DIRECTORS, . . AND REPEALING RESOLUTIONS NOS. 73-53-7 and 76-~2~7 WHEREAS, Secti6n 4733 of the Health and Safety Code pr6vides that the District Board has the power to fix the amount of compensa- tion per meeting to b~ paid each member of the Board or for each day's service rendered as a member by request of the Board1 and WHEREAS, Section 4733.5 of the Health and Safety Code provides that where two o~ more Count~ Sanitation Districts have joined.in the purchase, ownership, use, construction or operation of a sewerage system and ~aid Districts ~old their meetings jointly, and one or more of the Director~ serve 3S a Director on more than -0ne of such Districts ·meeting jointly, .the Districts may, by resolution approv.ed by each Dis.trict,_ limit the compensation of such a Director for attending said jointly held meetings; and WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, have heretofore executed a Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, dated July 1, 1970, as amended; and WHEREAS, Section 4734 of the Health and Safety Code provides that where two or more Coun~y Sanitation Districts have joined in the administration and operation of the respective Districts and hold their meetings ·jointly and such meetings are presided over by a Director of one of the Districts acting as Joint Chairman for and on behalf of the joint organization, each District so participating may pay the Joint Chairman the same compensation as a Director of such District is paid; and AGENDA ITEM #36 -DISTRICT 7 . l " cc-1 11 ..__..,.. . , .. WHEREAS, said Districts hold their reg.~lar monthly mee.tings :Jointly. ·.NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. of prange County, California~. DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: . Section·!. That each Director shall receive.the sum of Fifty Do~la~s ($50.00) for attendance at each meeting of th~ Bqard ot Directors or for each d~y's.service rendered as a member of the Board by request of the Board,_provided that he shall not receive more t~an the sum of Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) per·month as such compensation from this District. Each day's service rendered as a member of the District Board shall be deemed tci include, but not be limited to, attendance: (a) as a member of the Executive Committee of the Joint Administrative Organi'zation;· (b) as a member of any committee appointed by the Chairman·of the Joint Administrative Organization or the Chairman of the District which has established· the committee; (c) when expressly invited to attend the E~ecutive Committee me~tings by the Chairman of the Joint Administrative ... Organization; (d) conferences with State and/or Federal legislators regarding Joint Administrative Organization busin~ss when approved by action of the Joint Boards; or (e) attendance at conferences for business of the Joint Administrative Organization or the District when approved by action of the Joint Boards or the District Board. Section·2. If a Director represents two or more Districts, the payment to the Director for attendance at meetings or for each day's service shall be shared equally with each District repre- sented by the Director. Section·3. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 1, when a Director of this District is also a Director of another District, said Director shall be paid not more than a total of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) per day for attendance at any jointly -.,,· held meeting of said Districts or each day's services rendered II CC-2" AGENDA ITEM #35 -DISTRICT 7 II CC-2" concurrently to said Districts by the Director when such ·other District / or Districts, has, or have, adopted a re.soltJtion . substantially similar to this one, a,s is permitted under the provision~ ~f Section 4733.S of-~he Health ·and·saf~ty Code. Section·4. ·section 3 of this resolution sb~11 n~t apply to the Director serving as. Joint Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. The ·Director serving as Chairman .of ... the ·Joiht Admin~ istrati~e -Organi~ation shall receive the sum of Fifty Dollars ($50.00_) ·from each District which he presides over in a. jol.i;itly held meeting of the Joint_ Adminfstrative Organizc:t.ion, as· author.- ized by Section 4734 of the Health and Safety Code; provided, however, that the Joint Chairman shall not be paid more than Flfty Dollars ($50.00). by any District for any meeting; Section·5. The Director serving as Chairman or Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall receive the sum of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) from the District which he represents and no other District when attending a meeting of his District or other Districts or Executive Committee or other Committee as3ignm~~ts approved by the Joint Boards, or when attending. to special service rendered as -a Director by request of the Joint Boards. Section·6. Each Director shall receive the sum of Fifteen Cents ($.15) per mile for each mile up to and including 150 miles, Twelve Cents ($.12) per mile for each mile over 150 miles up to and ·including 600 miles, and Six Cents ($.06) per mile for all miles in excess of 600 miles, actua~ly traveled on business of the District per month. When traveling on the business of more than.one District, such Director shall receive no more than said mileage, whether on the business of one or several Districts. Section 7. When traveling on the business of one or more Districts, the Director shall be entitled to reimbursement of cxp~nses necessarily incurred in the course of said trovel in accordance with the following schedule: II CG-3" AGENDA ITEM #36 -DISTRICT 7 "CC -3" .· "CC -4" Commercial Transportation -per actual invoice Hotel -room rate per actual statement for occupancy · Registration -actual cost·of conference or meeting registration ~fee ··Ground Transportation ~ as itemized Telephone Service -as itemized Meals, Gratuities and Incidentals -$20.00 per day. In those· cases where the actual cost of the Director '.s personal meals and incidentals required during the course of the conference or meeting exceeds the per diem, reimbursement will be based upon actual expenditures. · Section 8. No Director shall receive pay for attendance at any meeting, such as Executive Conunittee or other .conunittees, which is scheduled immediately preceding, immediately succeeding, or con- current with a regularly scheduled District or.joint ~eeting of the District. Section 9. Resolutions Nos. 73-53-7 and 76-52-7concerning compensation for Directors are hereby repealed and made of no further effect. Section 10. This resolution shall become effective April 15 1976. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1976 1976. AGENDA ITEM #36 -DISTRICT 7 '{C -4" ·oric Center• 17855 Santiago Bqulci•ard • Villa Park, California 92667 • (714) 998-1500 March 30, 1976 County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue P. o. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Attn: Mr. Ray E. Lewis Subject: Annexation of Certain Areas within the City of Villa Park to county Sanitation District No. 2. Tract No. 7350 was inadvertently not annexed_ to District No 2 at the time of development. At the City Council Meeting on · March 18, 1976, Councilman Winn reported that he had discussed this matter with representatives of the District. It was moved and unanimously approved to authorize payment of one-half of $428 per acre for 10.8679 acres totaling $2,325.75 for annexation fees to District Noe 2 for Tract No. 7350. Very truly yours, CITY OF VILLA PARK ~1~ City Administrator THS:cv "DD" AGENDA ITEM #39(A) -DISTRICT 2 "DD" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 f:.LLIS AVENUE FOUN.TAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 • . : S T A F F . R E P 0 R T April 8, 1976 ; . • (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 Subject: Annexation of Areas Within the City of Villa Park 1;:o Sanitation District No. 2 An updating of the District's boundary map in the spring of 1973 revealed ·that certain areas had been annexed to the City of Villa Park, developed and were receiving sewer service, but ·had inadvertently not been annexed to Sanitation District No. 2. One particular area is Tract No. 7350 which lies southerly of Santiago Boulevard as shown on the attached map. After a series of communica- tions between the District's staff and that of the City, it is felt that it would be more expeditious if the Sanitation District would initiate proceedings similar to those which were done for. Annexation No. 8, Tract No. 4980, in the City of Orange. Inasmuch as the Tract No. 7350 is fully developed and all nineteen parcels are occupied, this annexation would be an inhabited annexation requiring notification and public hearings.· Since this area is similar to Annexation No. 8 in the City of Orange, it is recommended that similar actions be taken by the Board. These are as follows: 1. Initiate proceedings for an inhabited annexation and, if successful, declare a special exception for Tract No. 7350 and waive the District's connection fees therefor. 2. The authorization initiating the proceedings to annex the tract should set the fees therefor at one-half the established amount to be con- sistent with said previous Annexation No. 8. At one-half of the 1974 annexation fees, which was the time when the District's staff and the City's staff concurred in the inadvertency of this area not being annexed to the District, the amount of the fees for this tract ~ould be $2,325.75. This is the amount that should be paid by the City of Villa Park, along with the District's processing fees and those required by the Local Agencies Formation Commission and the State Board of Equalization. 3. Declare an intent to levy a sewer service charge in the amount of $10.00 per unit per month if annexation is not completed. REL:hje II EE-1" AGENDA ITEM #39(B) -DISTRICT 2 . ; ... "EE-1" :=: rn rr1 N -- > G> r-1 ~ d )> ----f rn ::::: :::;:t:: \..N LO ~ to ....__,, I t::1 -(/) ---f 0 ::::0 ,___. () ---f N :=: fT1 ~ N -- j :;· . . \ \ .· . • Ci . Jn l____ ) h(12 - 20 ~~--j ~~j · _Jf~ L ,_ 3.78-19 ~ lfiiZil SA1 J, JAGS • -4 Fi* *'' P : .;w -ar · ••••m:•••••ll--eouli:vARO i ~ ~ ® . ii 1~ 1u• -· .. ~ @) ~ ~ 1~ .. 'l l __ ,, .. °"+ J ISO' i PATRICIAN ·-I 110• '-0 ~I © ii ( 0 '.fARCH 1972 !ARCH 1974 ·7$ ~I © Ii © © LOTSP£/CH 8 cas rRAcr LA. ~-162 TRACT NO. 7350 M. M 280-12,IJ l•ZllO ®" 92·36. LOTSPEICH. H. $. 46 • S R. .s " .,,., /10/r, LOr S @) 6.04AC. ANO ca!s TRACT. ,· ·~ (!). ff) ~ ~ . 1"•100 1 ·.· AREA NOT WITHIN . . .J .. OR.ANG~ COUNTY· SANITATION DISTtelG·T NO" Z · . NOTE• ASSESSOR'S DlOCK & PA~CEL N'JM8t:RS SHOWN I~ CIKCLES ltSSF.SSo~·s MAr S00~378 PAGE .19 COUNTY Cf OR.4NGE · (=:) ~: ,I .(·=~~·:. i ' • ' -~ . l t 1 j. i • i . . j . 1 .. l I I • [ I ' 1 RESOLUTION NO. 76-71-2 WAIVING CONNECTION FEES FOR TRACT.NO. 7350 A RESOLUTION OF .THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING_ A SPECIAL · EXCEPTION ~OR TRACT NO. 7350 AND WAIVING CONNECTION FEES THEREFOR . * * * *' *' * "* * * * * WHEREAS, through an apparent oversite, Tract No. 7350 was not .annexed to District No. 2 at the time the territory was annexed to the City of Villa Park; and, WHEREAS, the City of Villa Park and District No. 2 intend to initiate proceedings to annex Tract No. 7350 to the District; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of District No·. 2 has heretofore adopted an ordinance establishing connection fees, which said ordinance became effective October 1, 1973. · NOW, THEREFORE, th~ Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. · 2 does hereby resolve, determine and order: Section 1. TI1at a special exception with respect to proposed annexation of Tract No. 7350 to County Sanitation District No. 2 is hereby declared; and, Section 2. That because of said special exception, the Board of Directors does hereby waive any connection fees for Tract No. 7350 that might otherwise be due pursuant to District connection fee ordinances; and, Section 3. That said waiver of connection fees has been approved only pursuant to the hereinabove declared special exception. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1976. "FF II AGENDA ITEM #39Cc) -DISTRICT 2 "FF" .. .. RESOLUTION NO: 76-72-2 AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS ANNEXATION NO. 13 -T~ACT NO. 7350. A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NQ. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE INITIA- .,TION OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO· °THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 13 -TRACT NO~ 7350 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2) AND ESTABLISHING ACREAGE FEE 11IEREFOR •, * * *. * *• * * * * *. The· Board of Directors of" County Sanitation District No. 2 of ··orange . . . . . . ·County, California, . ~ DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER; That ap application for annexation of territory to itself .be made to the Local Agency Formation Commi.ssi~n as follows: Section 1. That this proposal is made ·pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State Qf California; and, Section 2. That this application is for the purpose of annexing approxi- mately 10. 868 acres in the vicinity of Santia_go Bou~evarcl and Patrician Driye in the City of Villa Park to provide sanitary sewer service to said territory; and, Section 3. That the territory to be annexed is inhabited; and, Section 4. That the designation assigned to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 13 -Tract No. 7350 to County Sanitation District No. 2", the boundaries of which are more particularly described and delineated · on Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 5. That provisions for all fees required to be paid as a condition of the annexation must be satisfied prior to completion of annexation proceedings; and, "GG-1" AGENDA ITEM·~39Cn) -DISTRICT 2 "GG-1" . Section ·6. That pursuant to a heretofore declared specia~ exception, .. . . ........., the annexation acreage fee for sai~ ·annexation is herehy established at $214. 00 per acre; and, Section 7. That request is hereby made· that su~h proceedings as required by law be taken to comple.te 'this annexation. . ·" .. PASSED AND ADOrTED at a regular meeting held April 14 ;· 1976. "GG-2" AGENDA ITEM #39(0) -DISTRICT 2 "GG-2" ,. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE {EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) April 7, 1976 TO: All Directors TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 SUBJECT: Selection of Engineering Services for 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 Attached is a brief report of the Selection CorrJnittee's activities during the past month and their efforts to evaluate the qualificatio~s of engineering firms to recommend to the Boards of Directors for consideration to perform the necessary services for the 75-MGD of Improved Treatwcnt at Plant No. 2. The details of the engineers' qualifications and the Se lecticn Com.11i ttee 1 s recornmendaticms wi 11 be reported verbally in Executive Session at the April 14th Board Meeting. Since most of the material is cf a somewhat confidential nature, I am suggesting that any Director who is interested in the particulars of the Selection Committee's activities, or the qualifications of the engineer, or the maximum e11gine8r- ing fee which the staff has established for this project, contact Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer, before the Board Meeting time. hje Norma Brandel Gibbs Chairperson Selection Committee -. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVEN~E April 8, 1976 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORN!A 92708 (714) 540-291~ REPORT OF THE SELECTION ·coMMiTTEE FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES 75-MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO'. 2 . (714) 962-2411 Pursuant to the policy adopted by the.Boards of Direttors_Fcbru~ry 10, 1976, and in accordance with the Environmerital Protection Agency's (EPA) 40 CFR Part 35 et advertisements were placed in trade journals which circulate in the five western $tates, and a trade magazine which has nationwide ~overage. Iri addition to the advertisements, requests for proposals were sent to twenty-five known engineering firms who are knowledgeable in wastewater treatment facility design. The advertisements and the correspondence reque!?ted that the engineering firms supply the following: . , 1. Standard company brochure describing the qualifications of personnel°, experience records and other information that the co~sultant felt prudent to demonstrate his capabilities to perform the required engineering services. 2. Evidence of an affirmative action· program which will comply with the State and EPA requirements. 3. A list of recent projects that the firm has designed of a magnitude and type similar to the proposed proj~ct. 4. Identification of the project engineer and key staff members who would be assigned to the project. 5. Time schedules that the consultant felt could comply with the State and EPA regulations to complete the requirements of the Step II Grant. 6. A statement of no less than 1000 words, nur more than 1500 words, stipulating why the consultant feels he or his firm should be considered for this project. seq, Thirteen firms and joint ventures submitted the required information and indicated their desire to be considered for this project. Six firms declined to submit proposals because of other commitments, but they indicated their desire to be considered for future projects. In addition to evaluating the information submitted by the engineers, inquiries were made of the clients of these engineers, materialmen and equipment suppliers, contractors, as well as affected regulatory agencies. On March 23rd, the Selection Committee met to review the information submitted by the firms, as well as the evaluation made from ~le inquiries. Six firms were selected who appeared to be the best qualified to perform the services for this project. The six selected firms were requested to provide the .following additional information: 1. A statement certifying if any principal members of the firm have ever been subject to disciplinary action as a result of their professional · activities. · .. 2. Statement as to thefr pro~e-ssional liabili~y insurance. · 3. A list of any lawsuits that ·the firm was involved with in -the past ten years. 4. A breakdown as to the ·firm's areas of activiti~s-~s re)ated to the. different types of engineering: 5. The estimated gross receipts received during the 1975 calendar year and average annual gross receipts for the p~st five yeafs, as well as the anticipated gross receipts for services cont~mplated_ during the year 1976. ~ 6. Each firm was furnished with ASCE curves which are used in the industry to determine basic engineering fees in relationship to the total construction of a project. On these cu~ves, the engineers were requested to delineate the fees paid to the~r firm during the past five years for similar projects. A minimum of ten projects were requested to be identified. 7. The firms were requested to submit copies of bid summaries of con- struction bids received· on five projects selected by Districts' staff. For each project subm~tted, engineer was requested to state the amount of change orders incurred during the construction and to explain in detail where the total change order amount exceeded one-half of one percent of the origin~l contract price. · The companies were furnished with copies of the Districts' Supplemental Project Report, an Environmental Impact Report, Districts' Standard Specifications, example plan sheets, and a sample contract for their information in order that they may become more familiar with the project. In addition, a draft copy of the concept approval letter from the State Water Resources Control Board was included. The Selection Committee met on April 7th to review this supplemental material furnished by the six firms. After a thorough analysis of this material, it was determined that the following firms were best qualified: Greeley and Hansen Engineers of Chicago, Illinois John Carollo Engineers of Walnut Creek, California Consoer, Townsend and Associates of San Jose, California The balance of this report will be presented in executive session on April 14th because of the confidential nature of the material received in the evaluation process of these engineering firms. The Committee will request authority to negotiate with the firm it feels best fits the needs of the Districts for this project and establish H top dollar fee for the project. The Committee recommends that if the negotiations are successful within the dollar amount approved by the Joint Boards that District No. 1 be authorized to award a contract to the selected firm. REL:hje 2 • A COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENL/E FOUNTAIN VALLEY, 'CALlfORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 -(714) 962-2411 . 75-M0D IMPROVED. TRE!\TilfENT AT PLANT NO.· 2 'LIST OF FIRMS RESPONDiNG TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS .BY .SUBMITTAL OF PROPOSAL . .~ ' Boyle Engineering Corporation O'Brien & Ge~e Engineeri~g, I~c. 1501 Quail Street Newport Beach, California 92663 Brown & Caldwell 1501 North Broadway Walnut Creek, California 94596 John Carollo Engineers Walnut Creek Plaza, Suite 750 1990 North California Boulevard Walnut Creek, California 94596 CH2M Hill Lowry and Associates 121 East Washingto~ Avenue Santa Ana, California 92701 Consoer, Townsend & Associates 1671 The Alameda San Jose, California 95126 Engineering Science, Inc. Toups Corporation 150 North Santa Anita Avenue Arcadia, California 91006 Greeley & Hansen 222 South Riverside Plaza Chicago, I-linois 60606 Kennedy Engineers, Inc. 657 Howard Street San Francisco, California 94105 Metcalf & Eddy 1029 Corporation Way Palo Alto, California 94303 James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. 555 East Walnut Street Pasadena, California 91101 ... Nest~, Brudin & Stone) Inc. 16776 Bernardo Center Drive San .. Diego, California 92128 The Ralph ~1.' Parsons Company Hazen & s.a\vyer · 100 West Walnut Pasadena, California 91124 Steve11s, Thompson & Runyan, Inc. 5505 S. E. Milwaukie Avenue Portland, Oregon 97202 75-MGD. H1PIWVED TREATI1ENT AT PLANT NO ... 2 LIST OF FIRMS DECLINING TO SUBMIT PROPOSAL BECAUSE OF OTHER COMMITMENTS -Bechtel Corporation P. 0. Box 3965 San Francisco, California 94119 Daniel, Mann, Mendenhall and Johnson 3250 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, California Jenks and Adamson 543 Byron Street Palo Al to, California 94301 VTN Engineering 2301 Campus Drive Newvort Beach, California Y. S. Lin Associates, Inc. 711 East Walnut Pasadena, California 91101 Black and Veatch 1500 Meadmv Lake Parkway Kansas City, Missouri 64114 . ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS . of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE • FOUNTAIN V_ALLEY, CALIF?RNiA 9270~. (7T4) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 COUNTY S/\NITATION DISTr\ICTS of 0HANG[ COUNTY, CAl.IFOHNIA r-. 0. oox 8127 10044 I.LI.IS AVENUE: FOUNTAll-1 VAi.UY, CALIFORf~IA 97708 (714) !.40-2910 (71-1) 962-2411 75-:-t.tGD H1PROVEO TREATMENT AT PLANT NO, 2 REQUEST FOR PROPOS/\LS FOR ENGINEEJUNG SERVICES M/\ILED ON FEBRU/\RY 18, 24, 25, 1976 Bechtel Corporation P. O. Box 3965 San Francisco, California 94119 ·Black and Veatch Consulting Engineers 58 Sutter Street San Francisco, California 94104 Boyle Engineering Corporation 1501 Quail Street Newport Beach, California 92663 Brown and Cald\•Jell 1501 North Broadh1ay Walnut Creek, California 94596 Camp Dresser and McKee 283 South Lake Avenue Pasadena~ California 91101 John Carollo Engineers· Walnut Creek Plaza, Suite 750 1990 North California Boulevard Walnut Creek, California 94596 CH2~1/Hil l 360 Pine Street San Frnncisco, California 94104 Consoer Townsend and /\ssociates 1720 Gnrry Avenue Santa /\na, California Culp, Wesner, Culp 2232 SE Bristol, Suite 210 Santa Ana, Cal ifornb 92702 Daniel, Mann, t.tcndcnhnl l and Johnson 3250 Wilshire Boul cvanl Los /\ngclcs, California Engineering Scfrncc, Inc. 150 North S:mta /\nit.a Arc:11.lia, C:il :i.forn ia Environmental Dynamfcs 1609 Westwood Boulevard Westwood, California 96137 Jt.1mes M. Hontgomery . Consulting Engineers, Inc. 555 East \\Ta lnut Pasadena, California 94596 Jenks and Adamson 543 Byr:on Street Palo Alto, Califon1ia 94301 Kennedy Engineers 639 South Hill Los Angeles, California Lowry and Associates 121 East.Washington Street Santa Ana, Californl.a 92701 Metcalf and Eddy 1029 Corporation Way Palo Alto, California Neste, Brudin, and Stone P. 0. Box 2335 Escondido, California 92025 Pacific Architects and Engineers, Inc. 600 South I Iarvard Los f\ngcles, California 90005 Sverdrup and Parcel and Associates 417 ~~ntgomery Street San Francisco, California 9~104 VTN Enginccri ng 2301 Campus Drive NC\\'})Ort Beach, California Y. S. Lin /\ssociatcs, Inc. 711 E:ist \foJnut P:isnclcna, California 91101 St evens, Thomp:;on t; Rtm)':l n 1 Inc. 5!)0~) S. E. tti 1 \\':tuk ic Avenue Port 1 :111d, Ore~~on 07202 Ralph M. Parsons Co. 100 West Walnut Jasadcna, California Toups Corporation Post Office Box 1465 Santa Ana, California 92711 NOTE: --.-.. Iri addition to those listed above, notice was published in Engineering News Record, Daily Pacific Builder and Los Angeles Dodge Construction News (copies of ads attached) ,-CONSTRUCTION -PROGRESS REPORTS · MARCH 3 1,, 19 7 6 .:: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT S°'T£t" re:£D Crl\TES SE'T 1fJ £AcH f-WIU.'-- . ~ D/t;E~TERf ..-, .r J ~l'P/N6 /AJSTAt..LEO ()AJ FLOf>t.~ A A.Jr:> IAJ Tu~.HJEL~ \__.. -EXliT/N~ ~EtOJJDARY ,...-..... £1.All/FJE/l~ r . \ l'-_; 9 8 1 ' 5 4 3 2 I AEl?ATION 8A'JIN1 2 4 6 CATllJ.QL..K°"A /fJST1t1-L.GD f'U M PS ~S7£.l> . J 3 6 WA~TE ~LU06E TH/l/(ENEKS 8 7 :PIAMPS j2..ET\le.tJ El> 10 9 12 JI 14 I~ 1£lONDARY CLARIFIEKS l..IG.Hi Fl)Cl'U~ES E.J!.E:Cf'EP 6-ellVJ)t~ 8AS/N 'FlODf~S TtJ suPPVE.e D POWEK BUIJ.DIN& WO Wb~t:. 50 _MG D ___ ACTIVATED .. SLUDGE _ PLANT CONTRACT NO .. _. P_1 ~_l6 . • C.ONTRACT .NO .. P1 -t6 50 MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT Donovan Construction Company of Minnesota, Contractor STARTING DATE: June 27' 197 4 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $29,876,ooo.oo PAID TO DATE: $ 21~ ' 8 8 3 ' 18 9 • 2 4 CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 14, 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 30 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 13, 1977 Contraat is for the construction of Activated Sludge secondary treatment faaiZities a"/; Plant No. 1. The new faci Uties ZJi U aid the Districts in meeting nrindated State and Federai ocean discharge requirements. with Plant No. 2 effluent at the ou.tfaU booster station, improving the overall, quality of water pwnped thPough the outfall system into the ocean.- When conpleted, the secona.ary treatment sys.tern 'tJJiZZ process the 50 mgd of wastewater flowing ·through Piant No. 1. The effluent wiU then bl.end Significant structures included in the centre.wt are the B"lower Building, Aeration Basins, Second- ary Clarifiers, wo Digeste·rn, Waste Sludge Thick- eners and the Power Building. ~- . ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Work on Pl-16 is continuing at a slow pace. In the Blower Building, the balcony concrete pours have been completed. A member of the District's Engineering Staff witnessed tests of the aeration basin pumps which were conducted in Georgia. Supports were poured for the air header piping on the Aeration Basins. Influent slide gates and step feed sluice. gates were also installed and set. \ . In the Return Sludge Pump Station of the Secondary Clarifiers, the basement catwalks have been installed. Tests were conducted in Cincinnati on the return sludge pumps and they were witnessed on the return trip from Georgia by District's staff. The contractor has been grinding away high spots on the concrete floors of the clarifiers and has also installed the light poles and fixtures. ·Some piping and ventilation ducting has been installed in the ·waste Sludge Thickeners. Pressurization pumps to be installed in this area which are not in accordance with specifications are being returned to the supplier. Preparations are being made to get electrical service to the Power Building in June. Piping is being installed in the Digester area. This includes drawoff and gas mixing piping on the digester floors as well as some lengths of tunnel piping. .. ----0------ I~ ., i".LJMP!'~ r --- . ''PfA· I L __ · - JPL ACTS PROCESS PLANT JOB N2. PW-045 ·' CONTRACT PW-045 JPL-ACTS PROCESS PLANT J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation & Henck Pro, A Joint Venture, Contractor STARTING DATE: ORIGINAL CONTRACT: PAID TO DATE: Oct. 1, 1975 '" ... Contract is for construction of a one million gal- lon per <k7j pilot wastewater treatment plant at Waat~ater Treatment PZant !loo 2o The plant will use a unique Activated Carbon Treatment System (ACTS) developed by the National Aeronautics and Space.Agency's Jet Propulsion L<iborat.ory. This t-reatment method was perfected in its experimental 8tagea with a mobile research unit operated by JP~ personnel, at the . Districts' Waste-water Treatment Plant No. 1 in Fountain VaZZeiJ during 19 74-7 So Tho. system u.ses sludge removed from the wastewater t.o produoe activated carbon thr.ough a pyrolysis re.act.or. The activated cax>bon is then reintro- duce.d into the wastewater stream in a secondary stage for additional removal of polluta:ntso Only .. partiaZ.Zy used after the second st<;zge, the aativa- CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 28, 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 28, 1976 ted carbon ar..d seconda:f'y sludge slurry is fed into the inco'ming wasteti.Jater stream to focrease system efficiency o The mobile experimentai unit used to refine this system fram laborotor"d bench experiments l;)aB batCJh operated with mechanical handling of rr.aterial from stage to stage. The piiot pl-ant w·ill be a contin- uously run, crutoma.ted syctem. As a prime objective of the ACES, it could solve an increasing problem of sludge disposal as this m:i.terial becomes mo1~e plentiful with improved 'IJJastewater treatment and increased [Zous. In ad- dition, the effluent from this tr>eatrr.ent system is expected to meet the discharge requirements of the Districts 1 No Po D.,E.So permito ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH All major work completed. Subcontractors remaining for additional week. Solids process systems presently operating. Field start up supervision by vendor's respective equipment estimated to be. completed early in the month. District's operating and maintenance personnel are now responsible for all field work. XTJ1is contm.ot -ls a design rmd cortBtru.~t cmrtraat ?Jhereby the contraator is paid $50~000.00 plun .. t!w actu.1l coJJt1.1 for ali labor and mater..Z.alu. TRtNIOAO LAKE F££ . coN1RAC1 f-.lo.2- 14 - 3 GROV~ ~T. --_..:.~~ ,,~-··.~-ru~Tl~ ': ~" E • . CONTRACT 2 -14-3 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER & SOUTH SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONNECTOR, REACHES 2, 3 & 4 John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contractor STARTING DATE: Oct. ·15, 1975 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $3, 814, 462. 00 PAID TO DATE: $278,147.00 Contract calls for the construction of a 3.125 mlie reinforced concrete pipe trunk line sewer a- long La. Palma Ave. from Grove St. to Imperia.Z HuJy. in Anaheim. fiic first one-third of the project uses 51" diam- eter pipe, the baZan.ce is 48". Also included in the contract is a lateral con- nectott lirle to the Santa Ana River Interceptor system from 300' north of Santa Ana Canyon Rdo a- long ImperiaZ Hu:;y. to La. Palma Ave. This 2750' CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Nov. 12, 1977 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Nov. 12, 1977 section of 33" diameter vitrified clay pipe is designed to receive flows from the South R-z:ver Trunk, serving Santa Ana Canyon. With the comple- tion of the South River Trunk, the Santa Ana Can- yon pumping station can be abandoned. This section of the interceptor system is designed to handle up to 35 miZZion gaZZons flow per dmj. Included in this figure is 30 N.GD allowance fora accepting future high brine wasteu,'IQ.ter fZows ·from San Be.rna.Pdino and Riverside Cowzties. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Contractor laid 994 feet of pipe during March. Instailation of pipe is now complete from Grove St. east on La Palma Ave .. to where the new trunk line goes under the Santa Fe Railway tracks. This section includes a difficult.radius turning from Grove St. east to the far side of La Palma Ave., which the contractor was able to construct with a minimum of traffic interference and no street closures. \ Pipe installation has been completed under the railroad tracks. Last month it was reported that a gas line casing found to be lower than.shown on plans interferred with the contractor's tunnel casing. A new jacking pit was excavated on the east side of the railroad tracks and the tunnel successfully completed by digging in the opposite direction. Sufficient clearance was available for pipe installation under the low gas line casing. Cleanup operations are underway around the two jacking pit areas. First course paving has been laid. over the completed construction across La Palma Avenue. A jacking pit has been excavated at Tustin Ave. and ·La Palma Ave. and the contractor· is preparing to tunnel under the intersection. .,,..,,.,. .... DIST. 2 or a COMPLETE ----TO BE CONSTRUCTED CONTRACT No. 2 -14 -4 PROPose:o PARK S1T( PRIVATE RD. W€1 R CANYON RD. CONTRACT 2 -14-4 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH 5 Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc., Contractor STARTING DATE: Oct. 15, 1975 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: *4, 240, 957. 00 PAID TO DATE: $1,, 946, 568. 00 Contmct is for construction of a 5.1 mile long section of reinforced concrete pipe trunk line sewer from Imperial Hwy. along La Palma Avea in J..naheim, traversing th.e new Yorba Regional Park to Weir Canyon Rd. The right-of-way then crosses the Santa Ana River at two places as it traverses county territory through Santa Ana Valley Irrz:ga- tion Co. and Bryant Ranch properties to Gypswn Rd. CONTRACT COMP LET I ON DATE: Jan. 7' 19 7 7 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 7' 1977 Vepending on design criteria, various sections of this line use 42, 45 and 51 inch diameter pipe. This section will handle flows up to 32 million gallons per day. Ir.eluded in this figure is ZO MGD allou>a:nce for accepting future high brine wastewater fZOIJ)s from San Bernardino ar.d Rivemide Counties. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Construction on this job is going very well, with the contractor averaging 228 feet of pipe installation per day. He was able to lay 5;243 feet of pipe during March. The job heading is now on Santa Ana Valley Irrigation Company property, and continues with no major problems. The contractor discontinued construction when he reached the first of two river crossings in the project right-of-way and started pipe laying on the far side of the river. He will lay pipe under the river crossing at a later date~ closing the gap. Unexpected portions of 12, 15 and 21 inch irrigation pipe systems servicing adjacent orange groves were encounter~d in the right-of·-way during excavation. Sixteen hundred f~et of this pipe has so far had to be removed and replaced after laying the trunk line. Cost to the Disirict for this added work will be $11,000 through a change order. DIST. 2 ---- CONTRACT No. 2-14-5 :z 0 c/) .. COAL CANYON RO. GYPSUM CANYON RD. SANTA ANA CANYON RD. CONTRACT 2-14-5 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER REACHES 6, 7 & 8 S. S. Zarubica; Contractor STARTING DATE: Nov. 27' 1975 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $2, 096, 676 .15 CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 21, ·1976 TI ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 21, 1976 . PAID TO DATE: $302, 89'5. 55 Contract is for the construct-ion of a 2. 4 mile long section of reinforced concrete pipe line ser.J- cr. The line goes through the Santa Ar'.a Car.yon :·Jo;,z tJhere Contra.ct No. 2-14-4 er..da in about the center of the Bryant Rc:nch property, along the route of the Santa Ana River and through the noxrthern portion of the Green River Golf Course to the County Line. The line terminates in a controi and metering structure designed to measure flows from the upper basin counties. The line consists of 45, 42, and 39-inch diameter sections of pipe. The dU:rfr.eters change in rela- tion to design requircrr:ents. This section oj the Santa Ana River Interceptor system u;i7,Z r.and"le flows of appro:drrately 32 million gallons per day. Included in this figu.re is 30 /..'GD alfouJc.nce for accepting future high brine 7;,Ylstewater flou;s from San BerrzaPdino and Riverside Counties. .• ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Work has progressed satisfactorily on this project, with little or no impact on the adjacent Gre~n River Golf Course. The metering structure is 25 percent complete, with the base and vertical walls cast in place .. The contractor laid 2,095 feet of pipe during March. 350 feet was laid east fro·m the metering structures toward where a tunnel is to go under the Santa Fe Railrcad tracks. 1,745 feet was laid west and the pipe heading is now at the first of two river crossings in the project right-of-way. Large quantities of ground water were encountered during excavation, slowing work. This entire section lies along the north perimeter ··or the golf course. A jacking pit was excavated for the tunnel under the railroad tracks during the month. Sixty feet of tunneling has been completed. The completed tunnel will be 220 feet long. DISTL 2_ CONTRACT No. 2-15 lU ~ ~ C.AL STATE FULLEnTON ~ CAMPUS ~ CONTRACT No. 2-15 YORBA LINDA PUMP STATION J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation ~ Henck Pro, A Joint Venture, Contractor STARTING DATE: Sept. 26, 1976 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $671, 146. 00 PAID TO DATE: $674,006.47 Contract is· for the constPuction of a reinfoPced conarete structure to house wet we Us and pwr.ps for t1iansferring tributary wsteiJJater through a force m:zin line into the Santa Ana River, Carbon Ccuryon Interceptor-re lief Trunk Line system for conveyance to fiastevater Reclamation Plant Noo 1 in Fountafo Va7..ley. 'i'his will assist in relieving the presently co'Y'..gested Ner..;Jhope-Placentia Trv.nk Line and will serve proposed land use development of the tributary area to the year 2010. The pump station structwie is located at the in- tersection of Yo1 1ba Linda Boulevard and Assooiated Road in Fullerton. It is being· constructed on CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 22, 1975 TI ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 81 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 10, 1976 what was originally Uriiversi-tzJ of Califo-rnia, Ful- lerton property at the northern perirr.ete1" of fhe campus. SpeciaZ arr>angements i.;ere rrade 1dth the University for use of the property. The above-ground portion of the structur>e will be a low pr>ofile slab 85' x 109', 2 feet above ground. The deepest portion of the structw•e wn~Z · be 35 feet under the ground. The Distriat has agreed to construct a slump-stone fence a2 1ouP.d the structuPe and landscape the area in accor>dm-:ce with future compatible use by the University. Tr:e Univers·Z:ty pZ.c:ns to construct an arboretum in the immediate area at some future date. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Contractor ts awaiting delivery of pump motor stands. These were expected in February, and are somewhere in transit. Except for this item, and installation of the pump motors when they arrive, the job is essentially complete. Grass is growing in the landscaped area. --=~7r_.-N Cl 7=. TUNNELING UNDERWAY _.} ~.. JACKING PIT HERE DIST. 2 W +>• (X)MPIEIB ----• 'IO BE COiSTRUCTFJ) CONTRACT No. 2-16-2 CONTRACT 2-16-2 YORBA LINDA FORCE MAIN, FROM ASSOCIATED ROAD TO KRAEMER BOULEVARD Vido Artukovich & Sons, Inc., Contractor STARTING DATE: Jan. 29, 1976 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $660, 287. 98 PAID TO DATE: $252,084.24 Contraat is for construction of a 1. 4 mite sewer foroe main of 30-inch ductile iron pipe. This line wi"ll carry sewage pwr.ped from the Yorba Linda Punp Station at Yorba Lind.a Boulevard and Associ- ated Road ir. Fullerton to a reach of the Santa Ana RiveP Trunk line system at Palm Drive arzd Y..ro.emer Boulevard in Placentia. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976 This force main and the pwnp station cu•e designed to relieve the presently congested Navhcpe-PZcoer.- tia Trunk Line. It win serve proposed Zand use development of the tributary area to the year 20J.O. The force rr.ain is designed to accept up to 15 mil- lion gaUons pei• day flows. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH 2868 feet of pipe was laid by the contractor during March. Numerous utilities have been encountered in locations other than that shown on plans durl.ng excavation on this job. These have frequently been in the new sewer line path, requiring changes and slowing work. An 84-inch storm drain in Sapphire Rd. was found to run diagonally across the street instead of in line with it. The contractor will be unable to constructe in this area until redesign is completed. Tunneling is underway at the interse6tion of Yorba Linda Blvd. and Placentia Ave., with traffic restricted to one lane westbound on Yorba Linda Blvd. A jacking pit has been excavated next to the north bound Yorba Linda Blvd. offramp of the Orange Fwy. in. preparation to tunnel under the freeway. Pipelaying"has~een ccmpleted, backfilled and first course ·paving laid down on Palm Dr. from Bradford St. to Sapphire Rd. The contractor is preparing to replace the serpentine sidewalk through the park area in front of the Bradford House. Construction has also be.en completed and fj_rst course paving laid down along Yorba Linda Blvd. from Sapphire Rd. to Placentia Ave., and from the west side of Placentia Ave. to Deerpark Place. One lane of westbound traffic continues on Yorba Linda Blvd. in the vicinity of the pipe heading. During April, the heading will angle diagonally across Yorba Linda Blvd., requiring additional traffic control during construction hours. RANGE CITY -~,&'" ·~ BlJeNA lu ~ PARK ~ ~ CERRITOS CITY DIST. ___ 3_ --COMPLETE .---TO BE CONSTRUCTED CONTRACT No. 3-20-2 AVE. CITY OF LINDA ~IC.l--­ q:. ANAJ-IEIM AVE. ROAD \.-.... ~ ~ AVE. SVRACU5£. AVE. IL N , CONTRACT No. 3-20-2 KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 7 A. G~ Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Co., A Joint Venture, Contractor STARTING DATE: March 6, 1975 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $3, 876, 870. 00 PA I D T 0 DATE: $ 3 , 6 8 9 1 51 0 . 0 0 Contr-act is f':;r in.staZlation of a Reinforced Con- crete Pipe (R.C.P.) sewer line from a point 1200 feet south of Kate Ua Avenue on Knott Avenue in Stanton, north on Knott Avenue to Lincoln Avenue in Anaheim, a distance of 2. 3 miles. Pipe diame- ters a.re 72" fo1! the first 3, 900 feet, 63" for 6, 900 feet and 66" for the remaining 1200 feet of the project. Flows from this reach will drain in~ t.o Contract 3-20-1 to the south. This project is a portion of the Knott Interceptor reZief system designed to relieve the presently CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: March 6) 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: March 6, 1976 congested 11iller-Holder Trunk Sewer by intercep- ting fl()U)s from the nortT-rwest portion of District 3. The southerly ternnnus of the system is at the intersectum of Brookhurst Street ar.d E'Uis Avenue in Fountain Valiey. It win eventually extend to Imperial Avenue in La. Habra. This po~tion of the relief system is designed to handle a fZvw of 68 million gallons per Wd arid ?ViU serve the proposed developed Zand use plan in the tribu·tar;1 area to the yeaI' 2010. ACTIVItIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Contractor laid 1,947 feet of pipe during the month. 150 feet of pipe remain to be put in the ground, north of Lincoln Ave. Ground will be broken for this portion of the job a.round April 10. Construction of a tunnel under·LincoJn Ave. continues. Traffi~ cont~ol continues at·the pi~e·head during backfill operations and completion of a manhole structure just south of Lincoln Ave. Additional traffic delineators were set up north of Lincoln Ave. during the month in anti- cipation of qonstruction in that area. All merchants in the shopplng centers at the inter·sectin of Lincoln Ave. and Knott Ave. were visited during the month and the pipeline construction explained to them. They were informed of the ,job magn1tude, approximate schedules for completion and how it may affect their trade. Ba~e material has been installed in Knott Ave. from Orange Ave. north to Del Monte St. The contractor's paving subcontractor filed for bankruptcy after completing this sectipn. No estimate is available at this writing on how long paving will be delayed in this area. The contractor is atte~pting to engage a new paving firm to complete the work. Installation of the 21-inch vent pipe and 12 inch sewer line to the manhole in the intersectlon of Ball Rd. and Knott Ave. is ·completed. The ground has been closed and equipment n:ovcd. Paving will be installed next. _DI SJ. ___ 3 --COMPLETE CONTRACT No . 3 -21 -1 . . ~ '.J ~ t::JRANGEWOOO ~j ~1 ~~ ~h ~~ f?015MOOf? i':i ~1 k"ATELlA AVE:'. E,.--;.~';7·:-:-·-}...: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ''--' ~ \:> ~ ~ .... ).c I() ~ ..., FAROUJ.IAI? All. -----r AVE. IV WY. C' ' CONTRACT No. 3-21-1 WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 25, 26 & PORTION OF 27 A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Company, A Joint Venture, Contractor STARTING DATE: June 26' 1975 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $1,416,448.00 PAID TO DATE: $1,439,250.95 Contra.at is for the installation of a Vitrified Clay Pipe {V. C.P.) sezJe.r from the vicinity of the Iiiatriat 's rlests'ide Lift Station, . 1800 feet west of SeaZ Beach Boulevard and Lampson Avenue along the flood control cha.nneZ, along the channel to Seal Beach Boulevard where it -turns north along Los Alconitos Boulevard {the northern extension of Seat Beach Boulevard) to KateUa Avenue. It then turns east on F..ateUa to Lexington Driv~, where it · terminates. Pipe diameter is 39" for the first 5, 500 feet, 36" for the next 5, 700 feet and 30" for the final, 5, 200 feet. TotaZ "length is approx- irrate ly 3. l mi "les. This project is a continuation of the Westside Relief Interceptor sewer which begins at the SeaZ Beaah Bou"levcaid Pumping Station at the intersec- CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 22, 1976 TI ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 69. Cci.lendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: March 31, 1976 tion of SeaZ Beach Boulevard ar.d Westr.rinster Ave- nue in the City of Seal Beach. Tri.e system wi,Z l even-tu.ally run generaZZy in a northerly direction through the westem portion of District 3 and uiZZ, terminate at Cresent Avenue and /.foodij Street in the City of La Palrr.a. Upon completion, the system wilZ relieve the Los A"larrritos Subtrimk Sewer which, at present, fur..c- tion..q as the main interceptor sewer for the West- side basin and, for the rriOst part, is ci/.lTentZy flowf:ng at or near peak capaai ty. This portion of the relief interceptor is designed to handle flov.1s of up to 14. 'l mi?.:lion gallons pep day and will serve the proposed developed la:nd use pZan in the tributary area to the yea.r 2010. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH J 0 B C 0 M P L E T E . . DIST. 7 COMPLETE ----TO BE CONSTRUCTED CONTRACT NO. 7-6-8 llWALNUT II AVE. IL -- II lJJ 0 <! z 4: _J a. (/) w S:AtR l-\AVEN \IE. CONTRACT 7-6-8 TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, PORTION OF REACH 12 1 REACH 13 1 AND PORTION OF REACH 14 Steve Bubalo Construction Company, Contractor STARTING DATE: Jan. 29, 1976 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $512, 892. 00 PAID TO DATE: $136,840.QO Contract io for constructing a 1. '18 mile section of trunk lir:.e sewer of 21 and 27 inch dian:eter vitrified clay pipe (VCP) in the Lerron Heights area of Orange. The Zine begir..s in the vicinity of Fairhaven Ave- nue and Esp Zariade Street, gees north on Esp Zar.ade Street to Spring Street and east 011 Spring Street t.c Santiago Boulevc::Pd. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976 TI ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976 l This project is the fir.al portion of the master- plc:nncd Tustin-Orange Trunk Lir.e Relief System. The system proV'"~des drainage for the centre.I and northern portions of District No. 7. This section is designed to 1'.a.n.dle flows up to 6. 72 million gallons per dc:d and will serve pro- posed land use deve lopmen.t of the tributa1y area to the year 2010. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Work was begun and 2,800 feet of pipe laid by the contractor during March. The completed section includes 200 feet along Fairhaven Ave., a tunnel under the intersection of Fairhaven Ave. and Esplanade St. and north on Esplanade St. to 300 feet past Jordan Ave. All trenches have been backfilled and compacted to within 500 feet of the pipe heading. First course asphalt paving has been alid on Fairhaven Ave. to Esplanade ·st., and in the intersection of' the two streets. A jacking pit for tunneling under the intersection of Chapman Ave. and Esplanade St. has been excavated. on the north side ot the intersection. • SUMMARY TREATMENT PLAWI.1 WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During March Total Work A.waiting Award DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During March Total Work Awaiting Award TOT AL AIViOUNT UNDF.R CONTRA CT AND AWAITING AWARD $30,181,524 24,896,034 777,961 141,4~1 $17,355,463 8,,746,639 1,978,919 1,473,571 $30,181,524 141,441 $17,355,463 1,473,571 $49,151,999 AGENDA ITEM #12(A) To: Sanitation D~strict Directors. . : •'. " ... EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE REPORT -... , A reement with SCAG to Partici ate. i~ 208 ·Area~ Wide-Plannin ·for the Sou Coas Area:Modi ications o· SCAG s Resoonse o ·o .Planning Designation by the State Water Resources Control Board Attached is a draft of the ·conclusions and recommendations of the 4-County ad hoc group which has met on:ihree ciccasions during the past two weeks. The attached minutes of· Monday's meeting indicates those who have been involved in the discussions. The Districts' staff will further.refin~ the recommendations of the group for consideration by the Boards for Wednesday's meeting. ~(/.~i~4~ · .· Fred A. Harper ~ General Manager ........ ·, -~~ ~ .. ··-: ENVIRONHENTAL Pll01'ECTION AGENGY . GRA.i.'ff AGPJ.::EHENT Part III. b -Special co·uditions By ncceptance of this grant off er, the grantee agrees to the following conditions: I. Within sixty (60) days of acceptance of this grant offer, the .grantee shall submit a 'project control" program to the State and EPA for approval. The project control program shall include the . following work _elements budgeted within the spec~fied ranges: ·A. 'Identification of. the problems to be solved by the 208 plan. B. Identification of alternative management strategies to solve. th~ pro~lems. C. _Development of dnta, models, etc. to · refine alternative management strategies. D. Assessment of environmental impact of alternative management strategies. E. -Selecti~n and approval of .the 208 plan~ . F. Public participation in the development of the 208 plan.- G. State participation in the developm~nt of the 208 plan • .. n. Administration of the program. .5 -10% 25 35· 5 10 10 15 16 -21 5 .-. 10 .. 0 -8 10 -15 Exceptions to the above ranges may be considered upon submission of adequate documentation. -~ .. LOCAL AGENCY 208 MEETING · April 5 ," 1976. Rpom G-220 Engineering and Finance Building 625 North Ross ~treet, S~t·~ Ana Barna Szabo op~ned the· meeting by. having those :Present in.troduce ·.themselv_es. He then re~apped th.e previous Monday meeting for the benefit of ~hose who were not then· present· •.. The summary of_ the. me~ting was co.ncured·in. The discussion then· turned to the proposed organization ~hart and the responsibilities and· authority of the 208 Project Mc~n.-agement ·Committee.Supervisor Younglove poirited·out that there is merit .to having .a direct tie-in from the Project Management Committee to ·the SCAG Executive Committee. This could be facilitated by having the Executive Director se~ve as the Chairman of the ~08 Management Cammi ttee.. At the same time the Environmental Quali_ty and Re source Conservation Committee could be utilized to interrelate the 208 program to other envirori.m~ntal and conservation issues. It was agreed that the 208 Management Committee have the·responsi- bility to · 1) recommend the appointment of ·the Pro.ject. Director. 2) approve the 208 planning programs and budget ·3) provide 20~ progr_~ guidance 4) approve the selection of consultants and sub-contractors as needed 5) review and approve the final proposed 208 Technical and Implementation Plan. It was finally decided to designate a sub-grup of those present to incorporate the above in a draft of a proposed set of responses to the conditions stated by the-State Water Resources Control Board of consideration at the next meeting of local agencies at 10:00 · thursday, April 8, 1976 in the same location. Those designated to serve on the specia~ sub-group were: James H. Bunts Dwight M. Carpenter Fred Harper Leon Keding Dick Kuhns Larry. Lewis John Mitchell . ·NAME 208 Locnl Acency McetinG 208 Meetints 1!-/5/76 .AGENCY/J1JRISDICTION Dwight M.· Carpenter· Los Angeles Co. Chief · · Admi~istrative .Office . . . 'Victor. Ma.gistrale· :Jjyle Overby M1cha.e~ Cushing Max Augustus Larry Lewis Russ Larson Steven Crowther · Frank Page Tim Coweu · :Pan Cullen Joe Kennedy Ray Edwards Bob Rende Walt Hurtienne Fred Harper Mike Hammer R. E. Kuhns Robert E. Moore Wesley Hylen James· H. ·Bunts . . So. Calif. Associ~tion· .of .Governments Orang~ ·co'illi.ty. Board . .of Supervisors (Diedrech) Orange County Board · of Supervisors (Bat~in) L A County~ Sanitation District · LA" City Engineering L.A City Engineering. L A City Planning City of Orange City of Newport Beach ... L A Co. Dept. of Regional Plann. L A Co. Dept. of Regional Plann. Orange Count--y EMA Orange County Environmental Management Agency City of Huntington Beach Orange County Sanitation Dist. .City of Santa Ana L A Co. Engineering Dept. Santa Ana Watershed Proj. Audit City of Riverside Eastern Municipal Water Dist. ·PHONE (213) 385~1000 .. .. · (?14) 834-.3330 . c714)'·834-3110 (213) 685-521? . (213) 485-3087 (213) 485-3014 (213) 485-5393 (?i4) 538-1961 (?14) 640-221? .. ( 213) 974.-6457 (213) 974-6407 (714) 834-2300 (?14) 834~5985 530-5431 (?14) 540-2910 (714) 834-4135 (213) 9?4-7188 (?14) 682-6080 (?14) 787-744-1 (714) 92'5_,. 76 ~ Willirun G. Aldredge · · No:z:ton Younglove Tony Car~te~s · Leon v ~ -Keding · ·Raymond ·A. r1arsden John K. Mitchell Barna Szabo -2- Eastern M:tµ1icipal Water Di st. . . Riverside County · _ . . . Riverside·County.Planning . . San Ber~adi~o C~. ~laiming . Metro~ Water· ·Dist. ·of· So.· C_alif .• L. ·:A·. -Count7 -_~lood Centro~ :Dist. · County of Los .Ang~les Supervisor Hayes Office . (714) 925-7676 787-7950 787-6564 383-3969 (213) 626-4232 (213) 226--4386 .· (213) 974-1048 ~ ti) P-1 :::> 0 0:::: CJ C} z H ~ 0::: 0 :=: ·. ' 208 PI~ANNING PROGRAM , Environmental Protection Agency ·. I , State Water .. ·.i: ~ Resources µ~ H Control Board .. > .. r.Ll . tr:· i-------··--1 Sta·te-:-National :>-t SCAG 0 Review·Ro~,...d H Executive .. .... .....:! 0 Committee P-1 Environmental r--~~-------------Quaiity Committee I I I I I I I I I I 208 Program Manae;ement Committee Executive Director/Dir. of Planning I Public Input : .. · Citizen Advisory Committee _ Project --Director .,.___ _ __..,.. Technical Advisory Group Consultant Staff Groups ii-----~---Output Working I I I I I Solid Land Point Non-Point Waste Use Source Source Air > .. Groups I Management Implementation System . ~~ .. ·. -. April 8, 1976 4-County Subcommittee DRAFT .ORGANIZATION OF THE 208 PLANNING PROGRAM Policy Review -Environmeritai Prot~ction Agency ·EPA has the priruary responsi]?ility for .. the implement~tion of Section 208 of .the Fede~al Water.Pollution· Control Act Amendments of 1972. (PL .92.:--500). It has the: .. final appro.val _bf the designation application, ~rant funding, and· final· approval of the project plan including the instit4tiona1· mechanism for plan implementation~ State Water Resources Control Board SWRCB exercises the authority delegated by the Governor to ensure that the· 208 planning project and process con- form to State policy as expressed in the Section 106 State program, Section 201 facilities plans and the Section 303·( e) _basin plans. · State-National Review Board The Review Board· consists of re~resentatives from State and national agencies that are directly concerned with. effects and interrel~tionships of 208 planning and implementation. Among the agencies represented would be ·EPA, SWRC~, SARB, SCAPCD, California Regional Water Quality Control Board, OPR, DOT, CALTRANS and HUD .. Representatives of these agencies serve as ex-officio mem~ers of the 208 Project Management Committee. SCAG Executive Committee The Executive Committee has the responsibility of adopting the final 208 plan and implementing mechanism and sending it on to the SWRCB~and EPA. It approves the planning program and budget and the selection of the 208 Project Director and staff. Environmental Quality and Resource Conservation Policy Committee The Committee reviews the proposed 208 planning process and structure and malrns recommendations on these to the Executive Committee. It makes recommendations for the resolutions of policy issues as they may arise. The Committee recommends and oversees the mechanism for pro- viding public participation at the policy review level. . . ... Executive Director ,· Exercises the responsibility for SCAG staff .support . to the 208 proje~t staff and the SCAG policy review 'and 9versight functions . Project Planning . ~08 Management Comini ttee · · · The ·Management Committee ·will have ·a '_membership _composed· in the .following manner s.o as to represent .. the local ag·encies having &. direct·· impact upon water· quality planning and implementation: · SCAG Executive Director (serves as initial Chairman) 208 Project Director (ex officio) One representative. from SPAPCn One representative rrom AQ,MPTF (ex officio) One representative from each ·county Flood Control District. Orie r~presentative from a County Sewerage Authority in each County . .. One r_epresentati ve from -each County Solid Waste Agency One representative from each County Planning Department Two city representatives from each County including the City·of Los Angeles One representative from a water district in each· County One representative from ~~lD One representative from Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) One representative from Newport-Irvine Wastewater Planning Agency (NIWA) One representative from the City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power One representative from an independent sanitation agency in each County Chairman and Vice Chairman will be selected from and by the members of the Management Committee. The 208 Management Committee will have the responsibility to: 1) recommend the appointment of the 208 Project Director 2) recommend the 208 planning program and budget 3) provide 208 program guidance 4) recommend the selection of consultants and subcontractors -2- ~·· ... ·. 5) review and recommend the final proposed ·208 Plan and· I~plementation Meqhanisms. Pr.oj ~ct Director T~e 208 ~lanning wprk shall be ~arried out,· under· . . the supervision of the Project .Director, by staff of local agenci~s ·to.the greatest ett~nt possible.~ Existin~ 201 plans shall be incorpdrated directly. into the ·2oe ·pian-... ·work required to be performed under contract shall be· in conformance with State and ·Fede~a1· regulations rega'rd.ing competitive bidding, etc. 'The o~e~all work plan, budget, ind 208 staff requirements will be presented by the · Project Director for review and concurrence by the Project Management Committee prior to approval by SCAG Exec.utive Committee.. . The entire· 208 planning program shall be carried out with the ·maximum degree of public awareness and participation~ Citizen Advisory Committee The CAC will be composed of representatives of affected interest groups as designated by the SCAG Executive Committee. Technical Adviso~y Group The 2·08 TAG will be composed of technical staff drawn from the local agencies represented on the Management Committee. Members will be selected by the Management Committee. The members will divide into technical advisory groups for each of the principal working groups. Working Groups Technical project staff divided into individual groups, each designated for covering a major component of the project plan. Specific questions or review assignments shall be made to these subcommittees on behalf of the Project Management Committee as a whole. Maximum participation by the affected local agencies will insure an awareness of the plan development and early indication of conflicts. This will also increase the level of acceptance by local agencies and therefore enhance the ultimate implementation of the final 208 plan. Approval (certification) by the affected local agencies of the plan will be evidenced by concurrence of the 208 Project Management Committee. -3- Review.of Compl~ted Phases of the Plan ... :· .. Compieted phases of the· plan shall be·con6urred in by the 208 Project Management Committee prior .to transmittal to the SCAG Environmental Quality Commission for review with subsequent transmittal ·to the SCAG Executive Committee. Ideally conflict resolution will take place within the 208 Project Management Committee~ Concurrence of the 208 Project Management Committee does not require unanimous approval but requires tbat .. significant objections .be resolved. "Significant" shall be· def~ned ·by the 208 Project Management Committee. If conflicts c~nnot b~ resdlved within the·Manage- ment Committee, the Environmental Quality Com-· mittee and National Resources Conservation · shall act as an impartial hearing panel. If such cannot be resolv~di then the SCAG Executive Com- mittee shall act in a similar capacity. In a situation_ where there is still no resolution after having gone ~hrough the previously mentioned pro~ cedure, the Stat~-Federal Program Review Board shall hear arguments for and against and shall make· the final determination to resolve the conflict. -4- . .- RESOLUTION NO. 76-59 AUTI10RIZING EXECUTION OF AGREE- MENT WITH SCAG RE "208" PLANNING AGENDA ITEM #12(A) A RESOLUTION OF TI-IE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 Of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITII SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERN- MENTS (SCAG) TO PARTICIPATE IN "208" AREA- WIDE PLANNING FOR TI-IE SOUTH COAST AREA, SUBJECT TO SPECIFIED CONDITIONS * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) has been conditionally designated by the State Water Resources Control Board as the "208" planning agency for the South Coast area, which includes Ventura, Los Angele~, Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That participation with the Southern California Association of Governments in "208" areawide planning for the South Coast area is hereby approved subject to conditions established by these Boards of Directors; and, Section 2. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized to enter into· an agreement with the Southern California Association of Governments for said "208" areawide planning, on behalf of itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts. No·s. 2, 3, 5, 6, '7 and· u; and, Section 3.· That the Chairman.an9 the· Secretary be and,a~e hereby authorized to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1976. ·. LAW OFF.ICES RICHAR0°0. FRAZEE STE~HEN C.STEWART THOMAS L. WOODRUF'F .JE;F"FREY A. HARTMAN Strwd rt, 'VooJ ruff & f rdze~ '?SS NORTH l\ll~IN_ STREET, SUITE 0 1020 SANTA AN~,;CALI FORNiA 92701 Agen~a lt~m · Np. /Ii ... AREA COOE.714 83!5-6212 • -_ .. '.Mr. Donald Winn Joint Chairm.an .. .. . ApriL '_12, 1976 . Boards of Directors · County.sanitation D~stri6ts of Orange County, California P. O. Box si27 . . Fountain Valley, California 92708 ~ . Re: Executive .Session by Directors Re Employment of Engineer for Design of ·75 MGD Facilitie.s This opinion is r~ndered to you as Joint Chairman and to the Directors at the request of ·the General Manager and pertains to the agenda item.number 14 at the regularly scheduled Board meeting o~ April 14, 1976. Specifically, the question has been raised as to whether the Directors may properly meet in executive sessioR-without violating the ·.provisions of the .Ralph M .. Brown Act, to select· the engineer for the design of the proposed 75 MGD activated sludge treatment facilities at Plant No. 2. As you are aware, the Directors have appointed a select committee of Directors to establish procedures for the screening of the engineering firms who have submitted proposals so as to be certain to be non-discriminatory and to select the most qualified firm, all as required by law. However, the Directors must make the final decision as to the engineer that is finally selected. Your attention is directed to the provisions of Government Code Section 54957 which provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "Nothing contained in this chapter shall be construed to prevent the legislative body of a local agency from holding executive sessions • • • during a regular or special meeting to con- sider the appointment, employment or dismissal of a public employee .••• 11 .. . Mr. ~onald Winn :Ap~il 12 '· 1976 . Page ·Two · · . . ••.11 Non~elective positions of . ._. • -chief ·--~engineer·.-: • of ~ny govern~~nt2l district '. ·supplying services ~ithin. l~rnited. pound~r~es : ·shall.be deemed _employee· positions ~· .·.~ •11 •• •. . ·. ·. . . ... .. It .. is· .there.fore tnY ·opip°i~n ~h~t. the oir·ector~ ~~-y con.ve-.ne · in·. executive session .for, purposes of' making' the final determina- tion of the -chief engineer to be. ret;a{ned by the· Distr·icts . ·for: purposes of design· of the._ 75·· MGD facilitices-. . · TLW:ab cc: Mr. Fred A.· Harper . >!~JrA~a/ff· · Thomas L. Woodruff General Counsel. EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., April 14 , 1976, 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District's Board. * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 1 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 5:00 p.m., April 21, 1976. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at ~:45 p.m., April 14, 1976. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 14th day of April , 19 76. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto 19 76 . S-107 of Directors y itation Districts Nos. , 5, 6, 7, and 11 EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., April 14 , 1976, 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District's Board. DISTRICT 1 Adjournment * * * * * * * * * Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 5:00 p.m., April 21, 1976. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m., April 14, 1976. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 14th day of April , 19 76. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto 19 76 . S-107 day of April Boards of Directors itation Districts Nos. 6, 7, and 11 4-14-76 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN: CALL MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR TUESDAY) APRIL 27THJ AT 5:30 P.M. POLL COMMITTEE MEMBERS REGARDING MEETING DATE. INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING TO ATTEND: MILAN DOSTAL HENRY DUKE C!™oN E;A~ DONALD Fox FRANCIS GLOCKNER COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 EL~IS AVENUE (EU.CLIO OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) April 8, 1976 TO: All Directors SUBJECT: Building Committee Report TELE PH ON ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 Attached is a report prepared by staff and reviewed by the Building Committee for proposed additions and modifications to the existing Districts' administration and engineering building. The Building Committee and staff will present additional information in a verbal report at the April 14th Board Meeting. If any Director has any questions regarding the particulars of this report, I encourage you to call the Districts' Chief Engineer, Mr. Ray E. Lewis, before next Wednesday's meeting. hje Norman E. Chairman Building Committee . . ., . . : . . . ·-~ . . . . . . . . -:,_ _· .: .. -ADMIN~STR .ATIVE · ... _ :_ ... ···. · & LENGiM'~EErnlBNG . · .· . :·· ... · · ... _._ .. _ -:_ ·. . ·' fAC~l 1 T~' STf-1 m~v--· .··' ...... ·.· .. ·.-.,.:: ... . . . . . ~ ~---~ .. i . i1 .. uu ·, .. ·. . .......... .. .. . . . . ~ ' BUILDING COMMITTEE REPORT INTRODUCTION In the fall of 1970, the Boards of Directors authorized the prep~ration of a f~cilities study in 9rder that·a sound program · for the expansion of the ~dmi~istration arid engineering building be established. The firm of William.P. Ficker and Associates, AIA was retained to prepare this report. As a result of ~his repdrt; the administration facilities were remodeled in the .fall of 1972. T)1e duration of th~ expansion period considereq by t~e ar.chitect was established as five years and their·recormnendations .and subsequent building expansion was based on this timing.· PURPOSE OF REPORT It has become· apparent in recent years ·with public hearings associated with Environmental Impact Reports and Industrial Haste Ordinances, that on many occasions the Board room has exceeded its legal occupancy. Recent changes brought about by State and Federal requirements, have dictated the need for additional personnel to administer construction grant programs, and, after working with ·~ the new building for over three years, there are certain deficiencies that were overlooked or were not apparent at the time of the prepar- ation of the 1970 rep~rt. The purpose of this -report ·was to uresent to the Building Committee for their consideration the following: 1. Review the existing arrangements for the most efficient .use of the present building. 2. Determine the approximate area required for any modifi- cations or additions. 3. Establish efficient locations for the individual departments, improving the communication between these various divisions. The re~o~t w~s not prepared to design the required building additions or mod1f1c~t1ons but rat~er !O establish the criteria required for t~e next five years. This final report includes input and recommenda- tions from the Building Committee. PROPOSED AREAS FOR EXPANSION OR MODIFICATION Board Room The present legal occupancy of the Board room is 89 persons. At many of the meetings that have been ~eld in the past few months, the attendance has exceeded 125 persons. There are two potential areas f6r additional Board roo~ capacity, Those are: 1. .. - 1; E~pansiori·of the existin~ buil~ing ~acilities. 2_·. . The ·.second story ?rea over the engineering departJnen!=. -. . . . . . After.c~nsideration of the. flow 6f tra~fi6, accessibility,-and service to the public, it is hereby recommended that the exis~ing Board·room be extended. The pres~nt Bci~rd.room contains·. approximat~ly 1140 square feet (30x36). ·rt is ·suggested ~hat" it · b_e ·expanded to the north to 1800 square feet (JOx60) ·which will .· .. accommodate approximately 140 persons•'. The proj Efction and ~storage room that 'is·prciposed to be ·constructed· on the.riorth ~n~ ·.of the Board room i~.tci store additional chairs and the. Distri~ts~ camera equipment. · Purchasing and Personnel Two functions which should have ease of ·accessibility for the public are purchasing-and personnel. To improve the flow of . traffic to these .areas by the public, it is suggested that the personnel be located in the area n~w occupied by tl:e industrial waste section and that the.existing kitchen area be relocated to provide office areas for purchasing. The volume of records ·which must be kept in a vault area.requires, at this time, consideration of additional vault space. In · ConJ··unc'""~ O-"" T_'!;tt.-. .. ~,.... ~".,..,.._c,_"'~1 ~ ~,.... "..r= .,._~,.... ,.,'U".; c.· i-;-n,..,. ,,..; 1-""hc:.t9\ ~•-c....::l· :-.~. l.....1. l.l VV.J... l.1 l..11C .LC.HJ. \..l.~.L...Ll.1.f"-, V..L '-LL'-,._,.,.,,,..._._,._ .... ._ ... b .,.;.. .... ._.._ ... .._ .... -~ ..... --- provide space for purchasing, it is suggested that-the existing atrium be remodeled to.nrovide for a vault. This location appears .. to be the most eco~omib~l and is in -clo~e· proximity to ~hose--· persons requiring ease of accessibility to the records maintained in the vault. The balance of the existing atrium could then be covered with a skylight with an interior planter to maintain an open space area in the main entry to the administration building. Engineering, Industrial Haste, Maintenance and Operations The report in 1970 reconnnended the coalescence of engineering, maintenance and operations to provide better lines of connnunication. This adjustment has provid.ed to be beneficial, but certain minor modifications are recommended. Industrial waste, operations and the laboratory have closely aligned responsibilities and, therefore, should be located in areas of more direct coromunication. This can be accomplished by relocating industrial waste into an area now occupied by the maintenance personnel. A redistribution of responsibilities by industrial ·waste will not require their direct accessibility to the public. Industrial waste has, in the past, been responsible for issuance of sewer permits. This function can be better handled by the engineering.services department. It is suggested that the engineerin~ department remain essentially in the same location because of the existing eneineering vault and reproduction area, and the maintenance personnel be relocated on the .second floor directly above the engineering section. Account ins .Increased. demands by the State and Environme~tal Protection Agency on the administration of the grants program, ~nd the.possibility ~ of the Districts being forced to implement an user pro~ram which · would not incorporate ad. valorem·taxes, requires· additional accounting ~acilities. , These· facilities should be in close proxi~ity to the director of ·finance and basically in the rire~ riow occupied. To provide for these additional office spaces, -it. is suggested that the.·e.xisting one story portion of the building .. be extended southerly toward the. parking lot approximat~ly zo~~e~t.· . • >. General 'Administration · . . The present location· between the general administ.ration, the :. director of finance and the secretary to the Boards does not allow.· for an efficient flow of connnunication. To· a great extent, the telephone communication required by the administrative assistant and the assistant to the secretary of the Boards is hampered because of concurrent typewriters in operation. It is suggested that the additional offices be provided for administrative assistants and the general manager and the department heads of finance and engineering be relocated in the expanded area to the south, toward the parking lot. Lunchroom and Lounge ·Facilities With the suggested relocatl.on of t·he kitchen a.nd the o.ntici patr.d expanded staff, it is felt that more adequate lunchroom facilities should be provided. This can be·accomplished by utilizing the southerly portion of the second floor which will ·provide adequ?te .. space for the employees as well as additional facilities for infonnal meetings. Miscellaneous a. Restroom Facilities. The existing women's restroom in the single story portion of the building is inadequate at the present time and there is not adequate lounge space for the female personnel. It is recorrrrnended that this area b~ enlarged as shown. b. Reception Area. The present reception area does not provide enough space so that personnel can perform additional functions and the review of tasks suggested that all plans and specif ica- tions for construction work be handled in the reception area for better accessibility to the public. The receptionist can perform other functions if adequate space is provided. c. Reproduction Area. It is suggested additional reproduction area. be incorporated where certain reports and agenda material can be assembled prior to oistribution. 3, FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS The Di s tr ic t s are pres c n t 1 y preparing a fa c i 1 i t i e s · p 1 an for · improved .tr cat men t to m c e t the St at c a_n d Fed c r a 1 r c quire rn en t s . · · Thi s · program is estimated to range. from_$250 to $300 million .. · With ·tl1is level of effort-a~ditional engi~eering personnel will be rcqDircd for processing bf this program which wtll undoubtedly require · additional. maintenance ·a~·d o~~ra t iona~ ·personnel in the fut_ure .. fhe impr~ved treatment facilities an~ re~ulations .may ov~rtax ·our existing laboratory facilities, particularly when ~onside~ing the. anticipated additional work loads that· ~ill result from.the implementation of .the industrial ~aste ordinan~ei With ihes~ fut~re. demands· in mind, considera~ion should be given to expansion.of the· existing laboratory £acilitie~ some time in the future, as well as construction of another engineering, maintenance and operations building. These future consideration~ are shown un figure I. ESTIMATED COST Cost estimate is included in thfs· report and has been broken down for the various areas as shown on Sheet 1 of the cost estimate. Included in this cost estimate is new floor covering throughout the entire building including the second story remodeling, centralized air conditioning and new speaker system for the Board Room. This cost estimate does not include consideration for inflation which could add an additional ten percent to the estimate. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Department Heads and staff have studied the flow of communica- tion and need for additional facilities and modification of the existing facilities to accommodate the anticipated Di~tricts' · activities for ·the next five years. On December 10, 1975 and March 30, 1976, the Building Committee and the staff met to discuss these proposed additions and modifications to the existing administration and engineering building. It was felt that the staff has the expertise and knowledge to prepare the plans and specifications for this remodeling with the exception of needed assistance from a mechanical engineer and perhaps an electrical engineer for required modifications to the air conditioning and heating system, as well as required electrical modifications. One thing that must be considered is the minimum disruption to the existing facilities in order that the staff can continue with its day by day operation during the remodeling phase. It was felt that the construction could be completed by May, 1977 if the following schedule is approved: 1. Board approves final concepts and authorizes preparation of plans and specifications 2. Staff starts preparation of plans and specifications 3. Staff solicits proposals from mechanical engineering and electri- cal engineering firms 4 • April 14, '76 April 15, '76 April '76 ~. £oard approves mechanical engineering and e~ectrical engineering cohtra~ts 5 •.. complete pl_ans arid specifications. 6; Board approves ~lans.and ?pecifica~ t.ions · 7.· Receive bids 8.·· Awa~d contract 9;. Start ~onstructio~·· .10. Construction complete s. : ... · May" 12, '7 6 ~Sept". 1, '76 · Sept... 8 ,,_. '76 . Oct . . 6 , ' 7 6 , .. Oct. 13 ,-' 7 6 · .:··. Nov . . 1 ~ . ' i6 .. May !77 "C05T £5T/ MATE PROPOSED ADD1T101J ? AlT£f!..ATIOAI -ADMiJJ .. BLDG·. ,· ~'. •. . ~ 11 II AR€A 8 PROPOSED At<. el; AIGEA I' II A ,, /3 // !1 .~ ti ~ !~,., ,, ..... !! II & TC/AL . \\A·'' . I A££A . . -, . I . -----------' ... -.r~-1 . IA.lEA. I I ''C II . I L_~J· ,-, \ ·" . // . AIZ£A E ._I I 1 ':----·--_.,..._ _ _. A~E'A tI D II FIRST FLOOR /',DD/Tl ON. = I 3 531 I scprj II fl 1'50~ AR,t:A H 1024 • ,., I .,.. , -I 52- ?;4- 3 5 31 0r;~r I I IOIAL PROPOSED IJSEABLE A~EA I 181 /fl ~~ l ~ I . S£CONO F'-100R- A"'EA I~,, A/J!WNI~ Tl!..ATIO/J WING AD/JI/JON 1504-51/} PT<!., "'20/~rfJ/7, -:-- AlZE. A 118 "- _ , II 301 oeo !_., : 80A~D .~OOM -ADD/.TION" /024-_·srp.·rr. @ zo l·s(i, FT,·=-.: I ... . . Afl£A 11 C" -.... ··. VAULT~ PLA/\/ TEfi. C,' S~'I /~/GI-IT /IQ/) I T/0/''1 f!-£D ./}R.JC/<-VAULT). SLAB). !GOO!=) fJ...A.NT~J?...1. !/· 5/GL!&/IT-5 4-37 .s9,rr. e t:'2o;s~_Fr ==-..... · _ :"_ . . I #.81 74-0 I A IG£A "D II f£/GSO/JNG..'-4 LADte..5. J..,,ovtJGE ADDll!Ot'-1 . .,, ( R£i10DL;N6-48 2, 09. F-T. @. · 20 / s9. F7· !!.£MO 0£L-;d r I-~ £'/JC,.11JE£1G1NCr WI NG (t<.,eLa/l TE A/JD /IJ5TAl..Jf.., N£.W At.UM . .( G.(.AS5 PAK.-flrlOf-1 WAU9. 230 l1Ai. Fr. e #(po/ t1N. rr, :::. ----I .//131 800 A R6A "F II R-5MODCL C.Xl5TJNG-ADMIJ.J/STflATION AR£A (/2£110VING f;OME E Xl5T!iJt;-WALLS ~ /M5TALLIJJG-GLASS ~ ALUJVJ, M~VAt5L£" fA.R-117101.J WALLS. 4 2o'x w' 6K.'ILICrHI) A/(_,£ A 11 G // ADO/TIO N 10 94-SC?,. FT. @ A!J/11N IS-rl<A, TION £NT/2.."( 2.0 I 5 9 F .,-,, ,4/GEA • H 11 2 ND .!=LOO/?_, D_f: £1JG!N£b~INC.. WING. .f2£(JV~R£$ C~IL_llllt;-i··. -!=LOO~ t WALL. GO\/E:.J21NG 0/: l;J(IST!NG-SH£LL7 /,</)T/JILAr1cN ... OF /3 FllcD GLASS W/ll./D(}WS ptJ WeST ·, WAl,l .) ·/'1ClVA8L-ee F/X60 . fAer;r1~µ WALLS tf /JLUl1°C3/;V<;-BATHS. c' K,/TCH£AI . . . . I. /1£}.1 ii WOMJ:-N 6ATf!. 45C, Sf. tr.«:~ zo/s~ FT "-I.' i J 2.0 1 .. · . . ' . ~ 3, BAT/./ t K,/rC#eN . . /3Z .sp ,er t£ :2-o/ st; ,er= 4, Fl-00/!-i COV£~1AIG-5tp '2.,2. S((-FT. CAR.i">ET "). 1 II OV£12-~l~/-./TV</e ttrHI Cor.JC.. _; lz. //l/GK- I'~ q/O I 1'2,40] '/'/; ~50 5. C~ !L//lf (; C,,!)V£e..l/JG 5~2.Z S<(.Fr€2 isfst?,cr.-~400 , .. 7, MOV5Af>lc GLA.Ss 4' ALLIM Pli~TIT/011./5 / 33 1;1JJ. Fr. e lr,o / L1A.1, ;::r, = 8. STUP ~f1lL5 512-LIN I ~r. .. PLUMBING:- 1. Provi.de ahd in~tall 19 ·new plu~bihg fixtµres at 2nd f 1 0 0 r . ( 6 . vJ. c . ' 3 u. ' 7 L d vs . ,. j· s. ·S. ,' 1 s i n k w I G . D. ' . . · 1 E WC } a f $ 5 5 0. O 0 e-a ch .....•.•.... · •.•••.... .-.••. ·. : ... • . • .. . $ · 1 0 , !? 0 0 . 0 0 . . ... . . . . . ... 2. M.isc.· ·piping for -vending ar~a,. fl.oar drafn{, tra.p p r i in e r s , . · r e 1 o c a. t e . w a t e .r h e a t e r ~ . • . • • . • . . · • ~-. . •. . • .. . ~ • . . . . .. 1 , O O O • o· 0- 3 ." Re ni q v e · a n d . ca ~ · ~ x i s· ~ i n g. · ~ ~ t ~ r :: c 1 b s et ·~ 1 a y . , s i n ~· and floor sink· in riew. 1st .floor kitchen -and remove .and cap existing si·nk and garb3ge disposal in existing 1st floor kitchen and relocate to new · ·1st-floor kitchen ..•........•..... ~·····~····~······ 600.00 . . . . . . 4. Relocate and/or add roof drains and downspouts as required ......•... _ •.•. ; .. _ ••...•..•••••. · ......•... :.. 900.00 5. Cap an_d relocat~ hose b·ibb on South side, possibly relocate existing area drain in interior planter, relocate and reconnect coJd water~ gas pressure regulator and gas service into building, and possibly replace up to 30 feet of VCP sewer pipe and clean out to grade with cast iron ................ · 1 ~000.00 6. Disconnect, cap, abandon~ relocate, etc. existing gas; condensate drains, water piping and intercep- t q ·r s s e r v· i n g ex i ~ t i n g . H V .A C e q u i pm e n t a n d p r o v i d e , install, relocate; etc. new service for new HVAC equipment ...... -........ · ........... ·.................. 3,000.00 TOTAL PLUMBING CONSTRUCTION ...•.. $ 17,000.00 Above costs do not include: 1. General Contractors OH & P. 2. Contingencies. 3 . Ca r p e n try , p 1 a s t e r i n g , d r yw a 1 1 , ma s o n r y , et c . , r e q u i r e d to remove and install in existing structure. 4. Any unforseen problems because of possible errors in available as-built drawings. We strongly recommend adding 50% to above figure to cover above items. 50% x $17,000.00 = $8,500.00 = $25,500.00 Possible savings by doing some of the demolition work could amount to about $3,000.00. ~·~ ·.· ... , HEATING, VENTILATING & AIR CONDITIONING:· 1. . . Re~ove existing package air conditioning units s e r v i n .9 . ~ h e l s t f l l o r o f . t h e e·r g i n e e r. i n g : w i n g a n d > i n s t a 1.1 a· n e w mu l t i z o n e · u n i t . Co n n e c t mu l t i z .o n e . to exi st i n g duct w o-r k . l fr tons · i. n cl ·u d .i f! g demo l i - t·ion ............... -._ .... · . ., ........ ~ ....... · ............ ~ ...... .-.. . $:·a ~.ooo. qo 2.· .I·nstall n'ew ·1732.ton.syst~·m for. 2nd fJoor a-ddftio:.~····· · .. 17,850·.ao ·3~ Re~6ve furnace~ ~nd c~hdensing ~nits serving a<l- ministration .. wing {.18. tons). Abandon under floor .. · d u c two r k . R e u s e o v e r h e a d r e t u r n-_ a i r· d u c t s y s t em . Provide new overhead supply air duct. Provide an additional 8 tons of air.conditioning for new areas. Total including demoli~ion of ~xisting equipment~ ... · .. TOTAL H.V.A.C. CONSTRUCTION ...... . . . 31,600.0Q $ 57,450.00 The above costs are actual contractors price to the District. We have not included the following: · 1. General Contractors OH & P. 2. Cbntingencies. 3. Carpentry work. 4. Ma·sonry. work. . . . 5 . Remo v a 1 of ex ;. s t i ii g c ·e i 1 i n g s a· n d re i n s ta :11 a t i o n o f ceiling. tile. Total recommended budget: Air Conditioning .•......•••....•. $ 57,450.00 Contingencies ..•...•.•...•....... 10,000.00 General Contractors work, OH&P... 8,500.00 TOTAL .•..... $ 75,950.00 If the District performs all demolition and reinstallation of ceiling tiles, approximately $7,000.00 could be deducted from the total. If you have any questions, please contact our office. BAUM AND ASSOCIATES ~':12{/J~ Allan R. Cannon Partner . -. ,.· . . . . , " : ·G£NE!?-A L· COrJ re.Ac.. Toes PICO!=// tf OH · · 15 "lo or:.· TOTAL 0osr · · · CONT!NCi£NC /ES . . . ' ... :APf~Ox. /Olf/o /;1<-AN D TOTA~. .. 1113 oo/:Jo 'I ( woo 000 FUiUee. e:u~1uee:e1UG 6l.JJLDJUC::. (~I.) _____ __..,/ 000 :_,. Pl:20~EO .60Dli10IJ OF .. AOMIUl!if~TIOIJ e3UILOIUG r---, L.OCAi1C>U OF I ~ uew si.:~~r L __ J [CJ ~i!UG ADM! Lil~n!A.i10U O(JILOIL.tG ...... '-Lu:w VAUL.T M..e.A SITE PLAU fl I ~ A'-.rr:;.UUe. _ --------- ·' '-------4:_:::~------ ( r ,, Ii I I 11! I ':11!-'C. .••£.A 1•• •.SO.I , .. ,._, ···""• ... ~· -G>-;L.otU~ ~ r'°J.,..,,£,._ ~ -r I I I :;1RS.G.,.Ctc ~ ... , rt'.,<L'J! £. ~ t ... c l"'f-~~O'..).U .. ;.t.C(P.-\Ol... ~ .tr'TCM"!J • L-...;11. '"'•''' ·~ --'--r- (.. ~I~ l..I<. ID-Wli,..pi""°• -." FIRST fL-00~ f't..-AN ~i..e:.>-4 11 •1 1 ·0" .,.........., . -- FROP05E.D ADDITiON e ALTERATION '-~1!.1"11Ju WAL.L..S i.ir.w W.A.i..i.:~ eu·~uc ,.~. ' ~"°" ;~ix. ,14.& Foic,11.. AIPC) it& •&.a.I. J . ADMI N. f)LDG-. ( ,· I c;.::;1r="' ".? c:; 'l I •• It !j ,, .. ~~* .. ::.~~':t·.;;~ .;~ :: ,._ .;& 11 :: :1 SECOND HOOR Pl.AN MEETING DATE April ·14, 1976 TIME 7:30 p.rn. DISTRICTS l, 2 ' 3 ' 5 ' 6 ' 7 ' 8 & 11 DISTRICT 1 ·JOINT BOARDS . RIMA•··········-"-·-·---·1.DIEDRICH) .... ·.·BA. TTIN_~·.···· ·+.. -~. :DR."ICH) .•••••• BATTIN····-•• _<_._--· --LYONS) •.•..•. ··CALLAHAN .• · .•. ·--- £'1ANS l ........... GARTHE ••• • •• -~---·--DIEDRICH) ..•... CLARK ...•••.• · .-" --· -. EDGARl •••.• · ••••.• SHARP. •••••• ·_..,,_. ---·-WEDDLE) ........ eOOPER ....... -11-- DISTRICT 2 ' HOMRIGHAUSEN).cox ••.••.•.••• -.,/-- · CU(VER .~ · r . i . ) ·······--,p~ ·(LYONS)••••••;,•." CALLAHAN.lh.__:L__ -· _·v_ _ MC 1 INNIS ~•••••DOSTAL·.•••.••·.+·~ '"(DIEDR.ICH) ..•.... CLARK .•...... -./-__L_:_·_. -·-. G BBS)········ -DUKE.··· .•.•.• ~-.;--.. -·-. . ~GARTHE) ••....... EVANS· ....... -J-_./_ --· GARTHE) · • .•• · .. EVANS .•.•.• _..·.·.-. -..;-. -.- WEDDLE) · · FOX · v · .1 WEDDLE) • .••.• w. FOX .••...••••. ____ _ · •. • • • • • •. • • . •••••• ~ • i" • --------· PR I EST\ . . . · FRESE . . " · · (THOM) ... • .•.•••• KAYWOOD. ~lL"!!-• __ v _ -. -"---· . EVANS) .•••• ~ ••. GARTH·E· ••• • .•. •. -"---. -. . . . · PERRY · ./ ~· · · ..• ·• .••.. ~ · ....... ---- :HOLL IN.DEN) SCOTT:·····:-..,,-_ .. -./-.·.-~.-. ·. WIEDER)•.~···~·GIBBS .••..• .-.• ~ ·-·- HOYT) ··.·.··SMITH···.····.·-,/---·:·---. . . GLOCKNER .•••• _.·-"-_._ · · .......• · .. ·. .. · .-•• ~ •• ·.-,-·-;-·-·-,.· !THOM) • • •.•••••. KAYWOOD ..•• ~ .•. '_i _. _·. _ . GROOT).~.: ....•• WEDAA •••.. • ·.->-. _. ; -.-· SbNJU) ~ .. ~ •..••• MAC LA IN •••.. _··. ___ _ DU.NN~). •. • • • • • • • • • WINN.·····~··-..,-·.· . ../ -·-RYCOFF) ••.•.... MC. INNIS •• • •• -' --.. -: WARD) •.• ··~~······ WOOD.····· •• ·-/---...,-. -· -. . -BLACKMAN) •.• • •. MC KNEW······ :; . GRAHAML •••••••• YOUNG ••••••• _ .. _ __ __ ( ) . p;--- . DAV IS · • • • • • · • · MEYER • • • • • • · • · . . . OLSON •••••. · •• ~== DISTRICT.3 . (HOMR IGHAUSEN) .• ·cox •••••••• ·.·-"---"··_. _·_ (WEDDLE) •••••••• • ~-• • • • .---'--:_ -. -" -· -- . · . PERRY •.••. • .• _.; ___ . _ . (DIEDRICH).· ...• RI LEY ••••••.• _.1_ · __ . RIMA·· •.••. • •• _-! __ _ - - CULVER ••• •• ._J_· -· --- (GARTHE) ••••••••• EVANS • • • • • • ._·_./_ --' -· - ( ) ../ . ' PR I EST .••••••••• FRESE ••• ·r. ~.·----" --- ! v~ · v · ·~JM) • • • • • • · · • • • KAYWOOD· · · · -"'--- SONJ U} • • · • • • • · · • MAC LA IN···· v-_ -"'--- BLACKMAN).······ MC KNEW···· .• _L_ -·-"'--- DAVI s} · · · · · · · · · · MEYER • · · · · · -~ -..;-.· -- . OLSON • • ·~· -~ -·---· ~DIEDRICH).···.··· SCHMIT. fl .... __L _:L_ --' . " GIBBS.r·········· SHIPLEY·····-.. -. :Tj-.-- HOLLI NDEN). • •••• SVALSTAD· • • ·-· _..; ___ .·_. __ ~.YOUNG} • · · · · · · · · • STEVENS····--~-~ -- wooD) ............ ~'ARD ........... _/ _ _L __ (ARB I so) ••••••••• WE I SHAUPT· •• __!___ ---- DISTRICT 5 (RYCKOFF)) ••••••• MC INNIS .... -"'-__ J_ -- (DIEDRICH .•• • • • • RI LEY,y : • • • • ._L_ -" --- , RI f!1A. ~c,;-i • • -~ __::!_ --(..i DISTRICT 6 (Mc INNIS) ....... STORE ••••••• _v_· _·_ -- (DIEDRICH) ••••••• BATTIN······-"----- RI MA ••••••••• _.J_ ---- DISTRICT 7 --~ ... 'NS) .•••.•••••• GARTHE..... ,/ + -- D'TfD R IC H) .•.•••• CLARK. •••.•• __ J ----- MC INNIS) •••••.• DOSTAL..... " _v_ -- GLOCKNER .• "fiG " _v_ -- (EDGAR_) .•••••••••• SALTAR~L,L I." ./ -" ---l n.u.n ~o,.u.\ .--; ! 1... L ~ &+!! 1!;S. ' U'(<.. Tu • ' ,/ v ) iJ vT'90 er'). • • • • • • • • • • • • • • --.--J--- \HOYT) •••••••••••• SMITH....... v ---- DISTRICT 11 = !,;/,j ,/ (D!~DRICH) ••••••• SCHMIT •• J-;J_· ~ ---- - .. DUKE ••••••.• ------ (WI EDER) ..•••••••• GIBBS ••••••• _v_ ---- DISTRICT 8 EDWARDS •••. __f:_· --_ (JOHNSON) •.•••••• HOLM •. •••••• _&__ --- (DIEDRICH) .•••••• RI LEY ••••••. __;!__ ---- 4/14/76 . ROGERS •••....• _O-__ _ (EDGAR)········· SALTARELLI • • _\I. __ _ (DIEDRICH).····· SCHMIT······ · _·1 _ . ~ HO LL I ND EN) • • • • SC 0 TT • • • • • • • • ./ · EDGAR)········· SHARP · •. ·. · ~. ··, == GIBBs) •.••••.•• sHIPLEY ..•.•.. v C.seHUeN}-·?tY-? ••• ~. e~>'!l1\>~. · .. · ~ (HOYT}·······~·· SMITH········ _· _.; __ . -· (YOUNG)········· STEVENS•····· _J_. -- (MC .INN.JS).····· STORE···.·.··· -""-__ (HOLLINDEN) • • •·· SVALSTAD· ~·. · • _.i __ _ (wooD) .......... WARD .• ~ ....... -·' __ ·_ (GROOT)········· WEDAA · · · · • · · • -~---~ (ARB ISO).······· WEISHAUPT···· ~ _. _. ·-·· . , ~DUNNE)········~ WINN ·:.· • • • • • • _-_v ·-_. ·-· _. _ WA-R-B-) • • • • • • • • • • WOOO-: • • • • • • • • _. _. ·-· · -·-· ·- , GRAHAM)· · • · • · • • YOUNG • · • • • • • • _L_ __ HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS CLARKE TAYLOR ~~O(WN r {)c· .. / .·1 .. .,,_ WOODRUFF EWING HOHENER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVENS TRAV~RS (_ ! µ< .. , rt. , .. : , v v v -,/- ~ --.,/ .tiEETING DATE April 14, 1976· ln1e 7: 30 p.rn. DI STRICT s __ 1 ___ , 2 __ , 3_...,_s ~' 6 __ , _.;.7 ,_s_&_11_ =DlSTRiCT 1 RIMA •••••••• ~ ---- (Tl~t:DRICH) ••• • • •• BATTIN······ ~-----(~.\NSL .......... GARTHE. ••• ... ........- (EDGAR.l. ••••• ~ ... SHARP. .......... v JJISTRICT 2 ~ ·(LYONS) •• ~ •• ~ .••• CALLAHAN .•• -~ V ( . ) . v: DI ED R IC H . .. • . . . • CLAR K ..••.•• ~ GARTHE ..•..•••• EVANS.:..... ----~ ) ~ v· WEDDLE). •••••.•. FOX ..... :. ••••• --lL-V (THOM) •••••.••••• KAYWOOD •.•. -~ V ·. . · _.PEP.RY •.•...•• -~ v .-(HOLLINDEN) > ..... SCOTT ..... _. v v< (HOYT) ........... SM ITH ....... _JC_ V" -~(GROOT) •.•••••.•• WEDAA .••.•• -~ v (DUNN El .......... WINN. ....... -~ V (WARD) .••••••••••• WOOD......... v== v (GRAHAML •••••••• YOUNG • • • • • • • ~ ,/ · ]JSTRICT 3 -(HOMRIGHAUSEN) .. COX •••••••••• v V- . (WEDDLE) ••••••••• COOPER-••••• -~ v CULVER .•• ··-~ V. (GARTHE) ••••••••• EVANS •• • • • • .-1L._ / (PR I EST) ••••••••• FRESE •..••• -~ v ~THOM) • • · • • • • • • • .. KAYWOOD •• ·• V L_ SO NJ U} • .. · · • · · • · MAC LA I N. • . v i/ -- BLACKMAN).······ MC KNEW· .... 1/ / -- . CnAVI s} · · · · · · · · · · MEYER ....... a_., ~ -- . · OLSON • •.. • • · ,,.........-~ -- · Cn I EDR I CH) .••.••• SCHMIT····· V V:: (GIBBS} •••••••.•. SHIPLEY·····-k::::._ v HOLLINDEN) .••••• SVALSTAD· • • ·---1.c::::::. ,,....... __ irYOUNG}· .•. ~ ••••• ·• STEVENs ..... ~ ,,e= ·-- . ~man) ............ ~-....... -~ v __ (ARB ISO) ••••••••• WEISHAUPT··-~ / JlISTRICT 5 (RYCKOFF)) ••••••• MC INNIS •••• v:' v -- .fu I°EDR I CH ••• • • • • RI LEY· • • • • • • ....,...-~ -- ROGERS RI~ • • . • . • . °"-' a__, · JJISTRICT 6 (MC INNIS) ....... ST8RE ...... -~ __ -- llIEDR ICH) ••••••• BATTIN •••••• ,,..... __ RIMA.~.. v ___ _ JlISTRICT 7 (f"l\.NS) ••••. ~ •.•••• GARTHE ••••• V' V (,_~DR I CH). • • • • • • CLAR K. • • • • • • v V' (MC INNIS) .•••••• DOSTAL...... ~ V GLOCKNER .•• y/" V-: -~EDGAR) ••••••••••• SAL TAR ELL I. V v BURTONl. •••••••• SI Lls8....... ,/ / HOYT) •••••••••••• SMITH........ ,/ i/. -lJISTRICT 11 fuIEDRICH) ••••••• SCHMIT...... v ---- DUKE........ ,c----- --(WI EDER1 ......... GIBBS....... I/ -"DISTRICT 8 EDWARDS • • • • v<:: 1JOHNSON) •••••••• HOLM ••.••••• _a__ ___ _ WIEDRICH) ••••••• RILEY....... V: ---- 4/14/76 ~DINT BOARDS -::ti:. 1 (DIEDRICH) ...••. BATTIN ·······~ - (LYONS) · · ·······CALLAHAN •..•• ----~DI ED R I CH) · • • • • • CLARK • • • • --.• ~ -- WEDDLE)·. -..... G88PER • • . • • . . V - HOMR I GHAUSEN). COX ..•..••..•. ~ -- CULVER ••••••• ~ -- MC ·INN Is) •.••.• DOSTAL .•.••.. -4,L.._ -- GIBBS) · ····•· •.. DUKE-........• -L---- ) . / GARTHE ...••••.. EVANS ...•..•.. --- WEDDLE) •...•... FOX ••...•..••. ~ --· PR I EST) .••••.•• FRESE ....•.•.. ~ -- EVANS) ...•..•• ~ GARTHE .. • • . . • V -- WI EDER).~ ..•.•• GIBBS •.••••.•. ~ --· · .GLOCKNER ..... _x:_ -- (THOM) •. ~ •.••••• KAYWOOD.:~ ••.. ~ _._ (SONJU) · · •• .••.• MAC LAIN .••.• ~ -- (RYCOFF) ..... ~ .. MC INNIS .•••• ~ __ (BLACKMAN) .. •• .. MC KNEW ...... ~ __ (DAVIS)········· MEYER··.······ o_., __ OLSON ........ v __ PERRY ••.••.•• ~ __ (D I EDR I CH)· • • · • • R I LEY · · · • • • • · __iL:__ __ R I MA· • • • · • • • • • _lL_ __ . ROGERS ....... ~ __ ! EDGAR)········· SALTARELLI •• ~ __ DI. EDR ICH). • · · • • SCHMIT···.· .. ~ __ HOLL.I NDEN) • • ·• SCOTT ...••••. _.JL_ __ EDGAR)········· SHARP ••.••• : . ~ __ GIBBS)········· SH I PLEY •..••. _JL_ (BURTON)·· .. •••• 64LLS · · · · · · · · _v_ == (HOYT).········· SMITH········~-.--- . (YOUNG)········· STEVENS-···.· ~ -- {MC HHH s). ··• · · · STO~E · · · .. · • · --=::__. -- (HOLLI NDEN) • • · · SVALSTAD· · · · • ~ _· _ (woon) .......... ~ -· ........ ~ __ (GROOT)········· WEDAA · · · · • · ·• ~ __ (ARB I SO)···· • • • • WE I SHAU PT-..• ~ __ (DUNNE)········· WINN · · · • • • ..• L_ __ '-wARD) .......... woon .. . . . . . . . -.. (GRAHAM).······· YOUNG · · · · •.•. ~ == OTHERS HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS CLARKE TAYLOR BROWN WOODRUFF EWING HOHENER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVENS TRAVERS APRIL 14, 1976 JOINT MTG. (6-a) Report of the Joint Chairman Called an Executive Committee meeting for April 27. Mcinnis, Cox & Garthe couldn't make it then. Winn said the staff would pick a date and get in touch with Directors. Would poll Committee within the next week--tentatively for May 4th. Winn reported that Hal Cahill from EPA had met with Mr. Harper and he . Also Jack Rhett was here the following week with some of his people. Toured JPL process. Very much impressed with progress here. Advised that Mr. Harper had brought to his attention that we have received a request from SWRCB asking us to review our financial position in order to ascertain the potential design of an additional secondary treatment plant of SO MGD (in addition to 75 MGD presently under design right now). Winn then said that for the new Directors, we should arrange an orientation meeting within the next month or so and tour the facilities, etc. (6-b) Report of the General Manager FAH reported further on meeting with Mr. Rhett. Said he was quite excited about JPL. Last August there wasn't a thing here and our agency was able to put together quite a complex facility with a very short time span. Did it under emergency provisions of EPA requirements and State's requirements. Was hard but it can be done. Usually takes 2~ years the way the system is now. Will be writing this up to show Congress that it can be _done by a responsib'l~ agency. Have asked them to bring in EPA auditors to check it out. Reported on Houston trip. Talked about Earp process. Had some top people from Food & Drug Administration, EPA, Dept. of Agriculture, NOAH. Were attempting to get dialogue from different agencies on use of sludge. Lengthy dispute on disposal in the ocean. Is another law placing restrictions on use of ocean. Were numerous resolutions passed that will be presented to Congress. Congressman Jim Wright and his investigator were there also. (6-c) Report of the General Counsel Reported that most of the items he had to report on were coming up later in the agenda. No litigation other than liability claims. Regarding consent calendar item amending procedures on delinquent obligations, explained that sometimes have small claims that get a judgment on default and they don't merit spending the money to pursue. Turn them over to collection agency but auditors like to see it closed. Better off writing it off rather than carry it for 180 days. This amendment authorizes writing off from an accounting point of view. Regarding relocation assistance regulations, a recent amendment passed by legislature. Is a very important cost saving provision for sewering agencies as well as water districts. When acquiring strictly underground easements, we need not acquire an appraisal to present to property owner before negotiating. Exemption is for us if we amend our regulations which this does. In acquisition of large parcels will have to get an appraisal but for smaller ones we have the benefit of waiver if we so choose. Director Wood questioned Section 6 of delinquent obligations resolution. Asked what that meant. TLW explained if someone owes us money and refuses to pay a nd we owe them for something also, we have authority to offset it. (8) Warrants Clark questioned why FAH's certification of bills was not on agenda. Explained that this was the first month under new procedure. (9) CONSENT CALENDAR (n) Removed by staff because of error in change order amount. Item was moved, seconded and carried. (12-a) Agreement w/SCAG re 208 Planning FAH reported that for several weeks there has been a group of representatives from numerous agencies including county governments, special districts, planning departments and flood control districts complaining about the response that SCAG had prepared to State on 208. Said we forwarded to Directors the draft copy. In the last day or two we received what was prepared by Supervisor Hayes office in LA. Is a change in the diagram of responsibility and the way direction flows from SCAG Executive Committee. Briefly explained original authority. Said the concern of various people was that State had directed SCAG to involve local agencies in vote. In new diagram has tried to get 208 management committee--really a steering committee--to have more input to SCAG Director. Representation in management committee involves just about all the representatives of various environmental planning--NIWA, SAWPA and agencies such as ours. Flood control districts and municipal or water districts from each county think this has a much better chance of functioning so that the pl a nning effort will be passed to the local agency. Said staff is recommending that this be forwarded to SCAG Executive Committee as the approach that we would like to see taken. We would enter into an agreement with SCAG to participage with them and use this as a guideline for participating in the 208 effort. Director Wood asked about page 3, last sentence in paragraph 2 of green package. FAH explained that representatives on 208 management committee will be responsible to get information back to the group. If we don't like something in the plan, would be up to our representative to let that committee know. Not a veto type thing. Wood expressed further concern about plan. FAH advised there are going to be forums for discussion along the way and that cities are going to be involved. Flood Control working on non-use (?) sources and we are working on point source. Will involve all units at working level, not at management level. Resolution then moved and seconded. Winn then advised that Magestrelli report to Executive Committee that SCAG would take 30% charge off this for operation. Thought Directors should be aware of this. More discussion . Called for the question. Voice vote. Motion carried. (12-c) Air Quality Maintenance resolution FAH advised that before we can receive approval to move ahead on the grant, we have to have concurrence by the Air Resources Board that they are satisfied with our intent. Said this resolution permits us to urge the cities to adopt plans that will mitigate air pollution. We did add a section encouraging the Air Board to come up with a plan. -2- (13) Building Committee report Chairman Culver said he had an excellent committee and thanked them all. Said he learned a lot from the meetings. Said committee spent three or four nights with staff and especially Ray Lewis and have recommendation they would like to present. Asked Ray to explain as he was closer to problems. Ray reviewed history of this building, and explained future needs and reasons for more employees. Showed slides of proposed plan and present situation. Total cost around $300,000. Said he felt we have a competent person on staff for architect drawing but would have to obtain assistance on mechanical. Would like to get started with plans and specifications and budget in next fiscal year. Svalstad asked if this had been projected at all in our budget in the past. REL said did have about $140,000 budgeted last year but have not spent it at this time. Svalstad then asked if this comes out of each District. Was answered it comes out of capital improvements which is allocated back to indi- vidual Districts. Asked if we were using microfilming and answered we have looked into it but not feasible for our uses. Culver stated that the most important thing is timing situation. Said he thought if we had done this about six months ago, could have saved $50,000. Things keep getting higher. 11link the time is now. Moved that we move ahead with project. Motion se~onded. Voice vote. Unanimous. (14-c) 75 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities Resolution moved and seconded. Voice vote. Director Olson voted no. (16-b-2) NASA agreement re JPL FAH explained that this is grant funded. Work involved n eeds experts at Cal Tech for operational phase, so recommending additional money be authorized for this. Moved, seconded and carried. -3-