HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-03-10r
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAiN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
March 4, 1976
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. lJ 2, 3) SJ 6, 7, & 11
WEDNESDAY) MARCH 10, 1976) 7:30 P.M.
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY) CALIFORNIA
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962;2411
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, will
be held at the above hour and date.
EXECUTIVE CO\\h'lITTEE -WeJnesJay, Marcl1 31, 1976, S:3fJ p.m.
BUILDING COMMITTEE -Wcdnc~day .• ~b1'ch 7>J., 1976, 5:30 p.m. (Tentative)
I
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
March 10, 1976 -7:30 p.m.
Post Office Box 8 127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Cal!f., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
The following is a brief explanation of the more important,
non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which
are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lis ts are not
attached to the agenda since they are made up · i mmediately pre ·-
ceding the meeting, but will appear in the supplemental agenda
available at the meeting.
Joint Boards
No. 9-a and 9 -b -Approval of Plans and Specifications,
Brookhurst Street Improvemertts at Plant No . 2, Contract Nb. P2-8-8.
Plans and specifications for the improvement of Brookhurst
Street have been prepared in accordance with Huntington Beach's
standards for this improvement. This regularly-budgeted proj e ct
includ es approximately 4600 linear feet of curb and gutter in con-
junction with pavement widening of approximately 26 feet . Th e staff
has coordinated this project with the City's staff and the contract
will include certain items of work to be paid by the City of Hunting ton
Beach. The City's responsibilities include catch basins, storm drains,
street lights and a 5-foot sidewalk. Also inc l uded in this contrac t
is pavement removal and replacement at the Pl a nt No. 2 entran ce .
This pavement has sustained repeated failures and is included in
this project to obtain lower unit costs for the work . A sum.~ary of
the contract is:·
1. District's street improvement
curb, gutter, pavement
2. Districts' entrance repaving
Subtotal
3. City work, storm drain, curb,
gutter, sidewalk, street lights
Total
Engineer's Estimate
$183,000
24,ooo
$207,000
53,000
. $260 '000
Budget
$150,000
15,000
$165,000
The bid. proposal will be itemized in such a manner as t o separate ·
our project costs from the City's.
The resolution appearing in the agenda makes a negative declarat io n
with regard to the environmental impact of the project , and estab-
lishes a bid date of April 6 so that the work can be accomplished
as quickly as possible to minimize traffic conge stion during the
summer season.
No . 9 -c -Award of Job No . PW-049 -New Water Well No. 1 at
Plant No. 1.
Bids were received on March 2 for a new water well at the
entrance to Plant No . 1. Two bids wer·e . received in the amounts
of $42 ,046 and $44,580. It is recomme n ded that the award be made
to Mccalla Brothers in the total amount of $42,046 (budget,
$40 ,000). The engineer's estimate for this work was $50,000 .
No . 9-d -Change Order No . 1 to Contract No. PW-050 .
At the time the bid documents for this contract were prepared ,
the staff incorporated the insurance requirements as set forth in
the Standard Provisions for large projects wh ich require liability
insurance coverage in the amount of $3,000 ,000. Normally for a
project such as this, the maximum amount · required is $1 ,000 ,000.
The total contract for this job is $147,969. The contractor sub-
mi tt i ng the bid on this project did not anticipate the larger
insuranc e r equireme nt and i t is, therefore, the staff's rec orr@end a -
t i on that this change crder be appro\ed reducin g the insurance
requirements , with no change in the contract price .
No . 9-e -Attendance at California Water Po llution Control
Association Conference, South Lake Tahoe, April 1 4 -17.
This annual confer e nce is being h eld t his year jointly with
the Nevada Water Pollution Control Assoc iation . It has been
customary to authorize a number of. emp loye es to attend this Annual
Conference as we feel that their participation has been beneficial
t o the Districts in acquainting our personnel with practices and
procedures of other agencies as well as new developments in the
wa t e r pollution control f i eld . Our employees are active in the
Santa Ana River Basin Section of this Association and as members
and officers have a genuine interest in these meetings .
It is recommended that authorization be g iven t o designat e
7 District employees and the Joint Chairman to a ttend this mee ting
wi th fees and expenses paid . Funds for attendance at the Conference
have been included in the current fiscal budget .
-2-
District No. 1
No. 9-f -Receive and File Letter from Ci ty of Santa Ana
Regarding Raitt Street Trunk .
Included in the agenda material is a letter from the City
of Santa Ana requesting the District to proceed with the design
and construction of the Raitt Street Trunk to accommodate proposed
developments in the southerly part of the City of Santa Ana. I t
is rec ommended that the letter be received and filed and r eferred
to the staff for study .
District No. 2
No. 9 -g -Change Order No. 3 to Contract No. 2-14 -4.
In order to make construction schedule commitments, the con-
tractor has requested a change in the construction method of the
pipe to be supplied on this project, substituting prestressed pipe
in lieu of vertically cast pipe at various locations. This change
in construction materials has been discu~sed wibh State per -
sonnel who have approved this change order . It is recommended
for approval, which will result in no additional cost to the
District.
No. 9 -h a nd 9 -i -Approvi ng Pipeline License Agreements with
the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for Contracts
Nos. 2 -14 -3 and 2 -14 -5 .
In connection with the construction of the Santa Ana River
I nterceptor from La Palma and Grove Streets to the County l ine ,
it is necessary to obtain right of way from the Santa Fe Rai l way
Company where the trunk sewer crosses the Railroad 's right of way .
It is recommended that the Board authorize acceptance of the
License Agreement and compensate the Company in the amount of
$1 50 each for the two crossings .
. No. 9-j -Change Order to Purchase Order No . 30196.
In December, the Boards approved eme r gency action for the
repair of two manho les which were badly deteriorated in State
College Boulevard. The contractor was required to clear and
remove the deteriorated concrete and replace with new concrete
along with a PVC lining to p ro tect the interior of the manhole
from future deterioration . During the course of the work, it
was observed that the invert of the manhole was badly deteriorated
and that a new channel should be constructed to hand l e the flows
at · the junction manhole. This corrective work in the amount of
$909.88, was performed on a force account basis whi l e the con-
tractor was working in the manhole. It is recommended that this
change order be approved.
-3-
No. 9-k -Proposed Annexation to the District.
The District has re ceiv ed a request from C. Michael, Inc.,
for the annexation of 296 acres to the District northwesterly
of the Yorba Reg ional Park. Since suffi cient information i s
not available at this time for the staff to make a r ecommenda-
tion, we request approval of the ac tion appearing in the agenda
which receives and files the r equest and refers it to the s ta ff
for a r eport.
District No. 3
No. 9-1 -Approval of Agreement with Southern Pacific
Transportation Company re: Contr act No . 3-21-2 .
The alignment of the We s tside Relie f Interceptor, Contract
No. 3 -21-2 , crosses the right of way of t he Southern Pacific
between Kate lla Avenue and Cerritos Aven ue. It i s recommended
that the Board accept the License Agreement a t no cost to the
District and the conditions cqntained therein from the Southern
Pacific Transportation Company.
Districts Nos. 3 a nd 11
No. 9-n -Award of Contract No . 11-lR-l -Manhole Replacement
and Repair.
Bids for the reconstru c tion a nd repair of 35 deteriorated
manholes on the New l and -Deleware Trunk were received on March 2,
1 9 7 6 . Two b i ds were submitted in the amounts of $37,253 and
$71 ,.820 . It i s recommended that the award be made to Rewes -
Schock in the amount of $37 ,253 for all items of work contained
in the propo sal (budget , $70,000).
District No . 7
No. 9-o -Acquisition fr om Department of Transportation ,
Ri ght of Way Adjacent to the San Diego Freeway and the District 's
Gisler-Red Hi ll Trunk Sewer Easement in Costa Mesa .
In October of last year, the Board a cce pted the offer of the
Director's Deed (Quitclaim Deed) for acquisition of excess propert i es
of the California Department of Transportation which was deeded to
the District at n o cost . Cal Trans has offered to the Distric t
another parcel of land ad j acent to the property accepted in
October, at no cost to the District. ~h e staff recommends ac c ept-
anc e of the State 's offer.
-4-
No. 9-p -Approving Grant of Pipeline Easement from Southern
Pacific re: Contract No. 7-6-7.
In June, 1975, the Board declared its intent to accept a
Grant of Easement from the Southern Pacific Railroad Company for
a portion of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer extending from Irv i ne
Boulevard to Seventeenth Street. The Railroad Company has
finally completed the necessary documents for execution which
have been approved by the General Counsel. It is recommended
that the Board accept the easement and authorize the payment to
the Railroad Company in the amount of $43,086.25 in accordance
with the Board's previous action.
No. 9-q -Request fo r Annexation -Tract No . 5369.
In June, the Board referred a request for annexation of
approximately 7 acres of territory to the District in t he vicinity
of Overhill and Miravista Drive in the Cowan Heights Area . The
staff has reviewed this request and the proposed deve l .opm ent of
the property is consistent with the District's Master Plan;
therefore, it is recommended that the anpexation request be
approved. If the Board adopts the standard resolution authori-
zing the initiation of proceedings, we will advise the developer
that he must initiate proceedings to annex to the 70th Sewer
Maintenance District for the maintenance of the local sewers.
No. 9-r -Proposed Annexation No. 53 -Cray Annexation .
The staff has received a request from Mr . and Mrs . Donald
Cray to annex their property located at 21252 Santiago Canyon
Road~ which is approximately one acre in size . The property
owners are in the process of annexing to the City of Orange and
are desirous of connecting to a City sewer being constructed in
the near vicinity. It is the staff's recommendation that Resolu -
tion No. 76-50-7 be approved, authorizing initiation of proceed -
ings to annex the property. All necessary fees have been re-
ceived.
No. 9-s -Change Order No. 1 to Contract No. ll-4R .
During the construction of the improvements to the Newland -
Hamil ton Pump Station, the contractor was directed to perform
additional work which required extensive excavation, foundation m
modifications, and extension of the perimeter block wall to
better meet the street grades established by the City. It is
the staff's recommendation that this change order in the amount
of $1,214.95 be approved.
-5-
All Districts
No. 11 -Letter from Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD).
In December, the Boards received and refe rred to the staff
a draft EIR being prepared for the IRWD, which outlined several
alternative pipeline construction projects for the use of the
1 5 mgd ocean outfall capacity purchased from the Sanitation
Districts in 1972 . Since three of the alternatives involve
capacity acquisition and use of other existing Sanitation District
facilities , our staff has advised IRWD personnel that without a
c ommitment from the Board of Directors, the suggested alternatives
are not valid. We also advised that our staff could not make any
recommendations concerning these alternatives without an engineer-
ing study to determine the availability of the required 15 mgd
capicitie s and the costs associated with the acquisition of those
capacities. Prior to the sale of the 15 mgd ocean outfall capacity
to IRWD in 1972, our Districts' engineer, J ohn Carollo Engineers,
made a similar study which is now out of date.
As a result of recent meetings wj _th· the IRWD management, they
have submitted a letter, which appears in the agenda material ,
requesting that the Distr icts engag e our Dis tricts ' eng ineer to
make the necessary evaluations for our staff and Boards' con-
sideration . The actions appearing on the agenda accept I RWD 's
offer to reimburse the Districts for the proposed study , and to
authorize the General Manager to engage John Carollo Eng ineers
to prepare the required report, with the u nderstandin g t hat the
Districts are under no obligation to commit any additional
capacities in District facilities to IRWD as a result of this
study.
No . 12 -Quarterly Financial Report for Period E_nded 1 2 -3 1 -75 ..
Enclosed with the agenda material for all Directors is a
Financial Report prepared by the Director of Finance for the
quarter ended December 31, 1975 .. If any Director has any ques tions
concerning the report, please call Way ne Sylvester , 540-2910 .
No. 13 -Award of Specification No . A-080.
In December, bids wer e taken for six pickup tricks , with the
low bidder being Guaranty Chevrole t of Santa Ana . Subsequently,
Guaranty Chevrolet withdr ew their bid . Th e staff has readvertised
for the purchase of the six pickup trucks and bids will b e received
on March 9th. The actions appearing under this item on the agenda
r eceive and file -Guaranty Chevrolet 's letter withdrawing their bid
and reject all bids receiv ed on December 2nd . Since new bids will
ndt be received until next Tuesd a y , the results of the bid opening
will be included in Wednesday's Supplemental Agenda .
-6-
Di str ict No . 5
No. 20 -Second Reading and Possible Adoption of Proposed
Or d inance No . 509.
Ordinance No . 509 amends Section 402 of existing Ordinance
No . 508 , increasing the District connection fees to be more
comparable wi th the established connection charges in Districts
Nos . 2 , 3 , and 7 . The present District No . 5 connection charges
are $1 75 for new s i ngle-family dwellings and $90 per 1000 square.
feet of new construction other than single-family dwellings. The
new ordinance will increase the fee to $250 per dwelling unit and
$1 30 per 1000 squa re f eet of floor surface for new construction
other than single -family dwelling units . Hearin g notices were
sent to all permit holders and interested persons and public
ent ities affected by the proposed change . As of thi s writing ,
no additional comm e nts have been received from the public since
the February Joint Board meeting .
It i s recommended that the Board adopt the ordinance Wednesday
e v ening if no changes are made as a result of the second readi ng .
Dist rict No. 6
No . 23 -Adoption of Uniform Mileage Reimbursement .
The staff is requesting that all Boards have a uniform
Directors ' mileage charge to avoid a complicated, time -consuming
r ecor dkeeping procedure . Presently, Districts Nos . 1 , 6 , and 7
r eimburse Directors for mileage at $.11 per mile , while Districts
Nos .. 2, 3, 5 , and 11 pay Direc tors ' mileage compensation at $.15
per mile for the firs t 150 miles, $.12 for each mile over 150 up
to 600 and $.06 for all miles in excess of 600 actua lly trave l ed
on bu siness of the District per month .
It is the staff 's recommendation that the Board adopt
Resolution No . 76 -51 -6, adjusting the mi leage reimbursement figur e
t o be consistent with the other Districts and our employees '
mil eage reimbursement .
Dist ric t No. 1
No. 26 -Di rectors ' Compensation and Mileage .
In February , the Board deferred consideration of changes in
the Dir ectors ' compensation and mileage to the March Joint Board
meeting . Two reso l utions are in the agenda for the Board 's con-
s i deration. Resolut i on No . 76 -33 -1 is similar to the policy
adopted by all other Districts in 1973 but not adopted by District
No . 1. Howeve r, the staff has modified the mileage compensation ,
Section 4 , to be cons i stent with those Districts that recently
mo d ified the compensation and mileage sections .
-7-
Presently, Districts 1, 6, and 7 reimburse Directors for
mileag e· at $.11 per mile while Districts 2, 3, 5, and 11 com-
pensate Directors for mileage expense at $.15 per mi l e for the
first 150 miles and $.12/mile for mileage over 150 miles up to
600 miles and $.06/mile for all miles in excess of 600 during
any one month.
The staff is requesting that all Boards have a uniform
mileage charge to avoid a complicated , time -cons u mirig r ecord -
keeping procedure .
Resolution No. 76 -11-1 is identical iLl form and content to
that recently adopted by Districts Nos. 2 , 3, and 11.
District No. 7
No. 29 -Adjustment of Current Annexation Fees.
(This item was deferred from the Board's February meeting).
Effective July 1, 1 975, al l Districts adopted a uniform
annexation fee policy . The annual annexation fee equal s each
District's asse ts minus its liabilities, divided by the number
of acres within the Di strict. Therefore, based on this formula ,
the District 's staff has quoted an annexation fee of $1,029 per
acre for District No . 7.
Du ring a recent review of the cal culations, we find that the
collect ion system figures include $3.6 mil l ion for local sewers
such as assessment district sewers and local sewers within tracts .
Therefore, the staff recommend s that the Board authorize an
adjustment of the annexation fee to $828 per acre , thereby
eliminating the inclusion of loc a l collection systems which have
no bearing on the costs of the District 's Master Plan system and
treatment works .
No. 30 -Further Consideration of the Proposed Annexation
of Orange Park Acres (deferred from February 11th Board Meet ing).
This matter was de f erred from the February 11th Board meeting
and t he following is the staff 's eval uation of the Orange Park
Acres annexation proposal dated January 28, 1 976.
-8-
. .
Election Re: Annexation and+Improvement District General
Obligation Bonds $1,141,000-
Essentially, the proponents are proposing the formation
of an Improvement District to issue general obligation
bonds following a successful annexation/bond election
(2/3 ·majority) in the amount of $1,141,000.· The bond pro-
ceeds will acquire "right of service and use of the
District's existing facilities" which are equal to the anne~ation fees $455 ,400, payment of $671,6~4± for the
necessary Master Plan Trunk Sewers, Reaches 17 ·and l~, to
serve the area, and $15,000 r eimburseme nt of advances by
proponents of the annexation proceedings. ·
Prepaid Connection Charges for Parcels Within Proposed
Annexation ·
Each existing parcel within the annexed area as of the
date of the election will be credited with one connection
charge ($250) at the time the property is hooked to the
sewer. (425 parcels x $250 per conn~ction equals $106,250).
Any division of land after the date of election will
result in the property owners obligation to pay a d ditional
rionnection charges.
Installation of Loial Sew~rs
The property owners will construct the local collector
sewers either by cash financing or by assessment proceedings .
Reimbursement· of Funds Related to Master Plan Subtrunk System
Funded by Bond Issue
As a condition of the general obligation bond proceedings ,
the Sanitation District will contribute, from District -w ide
collection of connection charges 1 funds ~elated to the subtrunk
system funded by the bond issue ~671,684-·, minus th~ prepaid
·connection charges $106,250. These funds, $565,434 -which
will only be payable upon receipt of connection charges, will
be deposited in the Improvement District Bond and Interest
Redemption Fund, subject to previously authorized Master Plan
r eimbursement agreements. The proceeds deposited in the Bond
Redemption Fund will be used for the purpose of retiring bonds
in advance of maturity or for payment of both bond principal
and interest when due.
-9-
Tax Rate to Retire Imorovement District Bonds
This is the staff's projection of the annual debt service
for the issuance of $1,141,000 general obligation bonds for
the Orange Park Acres 550 acre annexation.
Annual Debt Service -7 percent, 15-years
Annual Improvement District Tax Rate
March, 1975 assessed value = $5,465,000
$125·, 300
'
(a)
(b) Tax Rate $125,300
$5,~65,~00 ~ 1 00 = $2.2928 per $100/A .V.**
Annual County Sanitation District No. 7 tax rate
= $0.4026 per $100/A.V.
Total Annual Tax Rate = $2.6954 per $100/A.V.
**This tax rate will be' reduced by District connection charges
coll ected and transferred to the Improvement Bond and
Interest Redemption Fund equal to $564,234± during the life
of the bonds. ·
"
-----------------------·--------
No. 31 -Adoption of Un iform Mileage Reimbursement.
The staff is requesting that all Boards have a uni form
Directors' mileage charg e to avoid a complicated time-consuming
recordkeeping procedure. Presently , Districts Nos . 1, 6 , and 7
reimburse Directors for mi leage at $.11 per mile , while Districts
Nos. 2 , 3, 5, and 11 pay Di rectors ' mileage compensation at $.15
per mile for the first 150 miles, $.1 2 for each mile over 150 u p
to 600 , and $.06 for all miles in excess of 600 actual ly traveled
on business of t~e District per month.
It is the staff's r ecommendation that the Board adopt
Resolution No. 76-52-7 adjusting the mi leage reimbursement figure
to be consistent with the other Districts and our employees '
mil eage reimbursement.
-10-
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
4 BOARDS OF om~CTORS
County Sanitation O:Stricts Post Office Box 8127
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
II
(I)
(2)
FILE .......... ·-{"5)
LEmR ......•..•..••
A/C •••• TI<LR {4)
(5)
Fi LE ······-·-··~ 6)
LETIER ..............
A/C .... TKLR , •••
···--·-·-···-----
······------
~
JOINT BOARDS
MEETING DATE
MARCH 10, 1976 -·7:30 P;M.
Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
Roll Call
Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary
Te le phones:
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
ADJOUnN;.: i::NTS ...... =: ...... "
CO~i:P & ~,i;LEN~E ..... ~.
FILES s:r UP ...... ~: ....... .
RES(ll.U;;o;:·:; C!::~TiFIED .. ~
LErrrns r. :::; ::r·i ............. .
MlriUTES •,·,:~:TEN ... ~ .. .
MINUTES FILED .... ~ ..... .
Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any.
See supplemental agenda
EACH DISTRICT
Consideration of motions approving minutes of the .. following meetings,
as mailed:
Ml~ District 1 February 11, .1976 regular
"")5 District 2 February 11, 1976 regular
MIS District 3 February 11, 1976 regular(~)
~5 District 5 February 11, 1976 regular, and
March 3, 1976 special
It\ ts District 6 February 11, 1976 .regular
1vtls District 7 February 11, 1976 regular ,..,, $0
µls District 11 February IL 1976 regular
ALL DISTRICTS
R~po:.ts of:
~ Joint Chairman
@ General Manager
@ General Counsel
(7) ALL DI STRICTS
Considerati on of mot i on to r e c e ive and file ce rtifica t ion of the
Ge n e ral Ma n a ge r that he h a s ch eck e d a ll bills a ppea r ing on the acen da,
fo und them to be in orde r, a nd th a t he r ecommen ds autho ri zation fo r
p ayme nt
(8) ALL DIS TRICTS
(8)
ROL L CA LL VOT E ............. -
ITE MS O N
S UPPLEMENTAL AGEN DA
Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating
and Capital Outlay Revolving Flllld ~cco:mts payable check re?i:ters
for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and a~thorizing
payment of claims listed on page "I" ; and approving accolllltS
payable check registers for si~a~ure of the Chai~an of.the .
respective District, and auth orizin g payment of said claims listed
on the pages indicated below:
DISTRICT 1 'n'an·ants, if any ...................... · .. NONE
DISTRICT 2 warrants -See page "II"
DISTRICT 3 warrants -See page "II"
DISTRICTS 3 6 11 3tt5pense ftmci • .. ·ar:rants, if any ...... NONE
DISTRICT 5 warrants -See page "I"
DISTRICTS 5 6 6 suspense fund wa:r:rants, if any.. . . . . NON E
DISTRICT 6 ·,;a rrents, if any •.•.•.••.•••••••••••.•••• NON E
DISTRICT 7 warrants -See page "III"
DISTRICT 11 warrants -See page
(9) ALL DI ST RICTS
"II I"
Ro!/ Call Vote or Cas t
Unan imous Ballot
CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEMS NOS I 9 (A) THROUGH 9 ( s )
All ma tt ers pl ace d upo n th e consent ca l endar are cons idere d
as n o t r equ i r i n g di scuss i on or fur th er explanat ion and
llll l ess any par t i c ula r ite m i s reques t e d t o be remove d f r om
the co n sent ca l en da r by a Di rector , staff membe r, or membe r
of the pub lic in a t tendan ce , t here will b e no separat e
di scussion of th es e items . All i tems on th e con sen t
cal e n dar wi ll b e en act e d by on e act i on approvin g a l l motions ,
a nd cas ting a unanimo us b a llo t f or reso lut i ons inc l uded on
the con sent c a l enda r. All items r emo v e d fr om t h e consent
c a l enda r sha ll b e cons idered i n th e r egul a r orde r · of busines s .
Membe r s of the public who wis h to r emove a n i tem from the
con sent cal en dar s h a ll, upon r ecogni tion by t he c h a i r, state
the i r n ame, address a nd des i gnat e by l ett e r the i tem t o be
remove d fro m the con sent ca l en dar.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Ch a i rma n will d e t ermin e i f a ny items are to be de l e t ed f rom
the consent ca l e n dar.
Con sid e r ati on o f acti on t o app r ov e all agenda i tems appearing
on th e co n sent ca l enda r n ot specifica lly removed from same .
~) ~, 'r\
-2 -
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
~ ~~_r: __ v
LETT£R ••··•·········
A/C .•.. TKLR ....
..-.-·-··-··-·········
' ....... ---·-··-··· ..
FILE -······-····---
LETTER ·······-·····
A/C •••• TKLR ••••
~ . ./ ·-··-··-············· ~~
~~ ... k: ........
U]"TER' •.. ~---··
A/C ••.• TKLR --
.. ii~_!L-
f1LE --: ---·-
~~.a .. ~.-~V'
A/C ••.• TKLR ••••
FILE ···············-·
LETTER ··········-
-----··-·····---
FILE 1:.-?..' .. k ..... .
LETTER ....•.......••
A/C __ .TKLR -~
--······-··············
....... --················
FILE ..•.............••
LETTER ·······-·····
A/C .... TKLR ••••
. --v ,.~·····;:····
'1.m~.R ) ..... ---·
~--' -'\i:
A/C LTKLR ~··'-
~ , ... ~. _; ---~-~-~~-It.-
'----····~······;J~·T
ALL DISTRICTS
(a)
(b)
(c)
Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from City
of Huntington Beach, dated February 18, 1976, relative to
inclusion of certain street improvements in the contract for
Brookhurst Street Improvements, Job No. P2-8-8, for which the
City will reimburse the Districts. See page "A"
Consideration of Resolution No. 76-41, making a Negative
Declaration and providing for notice thereof, and approving plans
and specifications for Brookhurst Street Improvements, Job No. P2-8-8,
and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on April 6, 1976,
said specification and proposal documents to provide separate bid
items for improvements to be performed on behalf of the City of
Huntington Beach and reimbursed to the Districts by the City.
See page "B"
Consideration of Resolution No. 76-42, to receive and file bid
tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for New
Water Well No. 1 at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-049, to McCalla Bros.,
in the amount of $42,046.00. See pages "C" and "D"
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Installation of Foul Air Treatment at
Plant No. 2, Headworks "C", Job No. PW-050, authorizing a reduction
in the insurance coverage requirements for the contract with
Skipper & Company. See page "E"
Consideration of motion authorizing the Joint Chairman and
seven employees to attend the 48th Annual Conference of the
California Water Pollution Control Association to be held
April 14-16, 1976, ·at Lake Tahoe;-and authorizing
reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses
incurred in connection with attendance at said conference
DISTRICT 1
(f) Consideration of motion to receive, file and refer to staff letter
from City of Santa Ana dated February 23, 1976, relative to
construction of the Raitt Street Trunk Sewer northerly of Sllllflower
Avenue. See page "F"
DISTRICT 2
(g)
(h)
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans
and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Reach 5,
Contract No. 2-14-4, authorizing a change in the type of concrete
pipe, at no cost to the District. See page "G"
Consideration of Resolution No. 76-43-2, approving and authorizing
execution of Pipe-Line License agreement with The Atchison,
Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company in connection with construction
of the Santa Ana River Interceptor and South Santa Ana River Inter-
ceptor Connector, Reaches 2, 3 and 4, Contract No. 2-14-3; and
authorizing payment in the amollllt of $150.00 for said license.
See page "H"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
FILE ··---···V. ...
~---·~······
I Ill D ).)I\_' A/C ---~~~ +/'
~~~~~~:~~~~
FILE ···-···········-
LETIER ·······-·-
A/C •.•• TKLR ··--~~-> ~--··················-
( ·--, '~········v.:·-·
LETIER ·····---~
A/C _ .. TKLR •••• .....__
/ -_-___ .. _ .. K.: .. _
"""'' ~--
A/C .... TKLR 1
~:~~---·-·
r;-, ·. ~ v
FILE ~-~········
LETIER ····-·--
A/C .... TKLR ·-
FILE •••••• ':.:. ••••••• _
I -,ETTE~ ... : ____ _ __ ,,.
~~:~~~-
-, v FILE ••••••••••••••••••
;~ER--~
AJC' .. .itKLRJ ••••
DISTRICT 2 (Continued)
(i) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-44-2, approving and authorizing
execution of Pipe-Line License agreement with The Atchison, Topeka
and Santa Fe Railway Company in connection with construction of
the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Reaches 6, 7 and 8, Contract
No. 2-14-5; and authorizing payment in the amount of $150.00 for
said license. See page "I"
(j) Consideration of motion authorizing issuance of a change order to the
emergency purchase order contract with F. B. Cook Corporation for
additional work in the amollllt of $909.88, relative to reshaping of
manhole in connection with repairs at the intersection of State
College Boulevard and Orangethorpe (Newhope-Placentia Trtmk Sewer)
(k) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from C. Michael,
Inc. for annexation of approximately 295.87 acres of territory to
the District northerly of the Yorba Regional Park, and refer to staff
for study and recommendation. See page "J"
DISTRICT 3
(1)
(m)
Consideration of Resolution No. 76-45-3, approving and authorizing
execution of agreement with Southern Pacific Transportation Company
for right of way in connection with construction of the Westside
Relief Interceptor, Portion of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 and 29,
Contract No. 3-21-2, at no cost to the District. See page "K"
Consideration of motion to receive and file Swnmons and First Amended
Complaint for Damages for Persomi:...i Injuries, in Case No. 239335,
Darryl Nasser vs. Radna Balstad, et al., in connection with construction
of the Westside Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 and Portion of 27,
Contract No. 3-21-1, and refer to the District's General Counsel and
liability insurance carrier for appropriate action.
DISTRICTS 3 & 11
Consideration of Resolution No. 76-46, to receive and file bid
tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Manhole
Replacement and Repair, Contract No. 11-lR-l, to Rewes-Schock, in
the amount o·f $37,253.00. See pages "L" and "M"
DISTRICT 7
(o) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-47-7, authorizing acceptance of
Director's Deed from the State of California, Department of Transpor-
tation, for acquisition of excess property adjacent to the San Diego
Freeway and abutting the District's easement for the Gisler-Red Hill
Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-1, at no cost to the District. See
page "N"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5)
-4-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4)
.,.._,,, -/
\ FILE ••• -.Jl---'----
\. LETTER ···---·-Ate .~ .. TKLV ·--~~~--·~~-~,/ .¥~-----········ ... -
FILE •••.••..•.. ~~
c§~R!: ..... :_ .....
A/C .... TKLR ••••
._-~·;.~.~---~;~~~N,
:~~~~-~~: .. f.~~::.: .. :.. \.
f
fiLe .... L~-....... -
-: ) i\\-(_ LET~~.R ·-····-··-
A/C .••. TKLR ••••
'~.:::.c~~:~ ... 2'?:~.:c ~
···-····-················
FILE •••••••.•...••••••
-TTER ·······-·····
"""1f/C .•.• TKLR .•••
-·----··············-·
DISTRICT 7 (Continued)
(p) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-48-7, approving and authorizing
execution of agreement with Southern Pacific Transportation Company
for right of way in connection with construction of the Tustin-Orange
Trunk Sewer, Reach 11 and Portion of Reach 12, Contract No. 7-6-7;
and authorizing payments in the amounts of $40,000.00 for permanent right
of way and $ 3, 086. 25 for temporary right of way. See page· "0"
(q) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-49-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 6.647 acres of
territory to the District in the vicinity of Overhill and Miravista
Drive (Proposed Annexation No. 48 -Tract No. 5369 to Cotmty
Sanitation District No. 7)
(r) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Donald
Cray for annexation of approximately one acre of territory to the
District in the vicinity of Sanitago Canyon Road and Amapola Avenue;
and consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-50-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex said territory (Proposed
Annexation No. 53 -Cray Annexation to Cotmty Sanitation District No. 7)
See page "P"
DISTRICT 11
(s) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans
and specifications to Remodel Newland-Hamilton Pumping Station
Facilities, Contract No. ll-4R, authorizing an addition of $1,214.95
to the contract with Clifford L. Thompson Construction Company for
additional block wall and excavation and grading, and granting a time
extension of 30 calendar days to accomplish said work. See page "Q"
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
-5-
. (11) ALL DISTRICTS
(a)
FILE ~<f:'
l ETTER .............. N) I s
Considera tion of motion to receive and file letter from Irvine Ranch
Wa ter District d ated March 4, 1976, r e lative to alternate· connection
points to the Sanitation Districts' outfall system and costs as s ociate d
therewith.pursuant to the agreement between the respective parties
c .... 1 Kl R ... . dated .January 12, 1972. See page "R"
Conside ration of motion authorizing the General Manager to engage
/:'~)_.-.-1~····;,~-·.~-~ N\ ).S John Carollo Engineers to prepare a report regarding Irvine Ranch Water ·
~-~~~-~-, District's request for information relative to alternate connection
tEnER ·······-··-~ points to the Districts' outfall system, all costs of said study and
----(b)
A/C ____ ,.KLR •••• report to be borne by the Irvine Ranch Water District
:~::r.:::~12) ALL DISTRIC!S f . . d l\/\\S Consideration o motion to receive an file financial report of Director of
11 1 Finance for quar ter ending December 31, 1975 (Mailed with agenda material)
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
Othe~ business 4Il~comnunications or supplemental agenda items, if any
~~~of .items relative to award of Specification No. A-080, ~Six (6) 1/2 Ton Pickup Trucks (Awarded to Guaranty Chevrolet on 12/10/75):
ITEMS ON
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA (1)
FILE •••..••••...•.•• ,.
~~R?~
A/C .... 1 KLR ••••
tQJ..~~~ v
~~~2~
~ l '::>
~1?(2)
M~ (3J
Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Guaranty
Chevrolet dated February 19, 1976, withdrawing their bid on
Specification No. A-080 due to an error thereon. See page ~-"_S_"~
Consideration of motion rejecting all bids received on December 2,
1975, for Specification No. A-080, Six (6) 1/2 Ton Pickup Trucks
Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation, and awarding purchase of Six (6). 1/2 Ton Pickup
Trucks, Specification No. A-080 Rebid, to Santa Ana Dodge in the
amount of $26,076.00. See page "IV''
-· '?~~2 <:::.--~ s
(14) DISTRICT 2 :~~E~·-:::::::::::::: ~business and communications or supplemental agenda i terns, if any
A/C .... l"KLR .... , ~Consideration of request of Director Dale T . Chaput, Councilman,
~-~~oN City of Yorba Linda, dated March 3, 1976, to reconsider Resolution
SUP PLEMENTAL AGENDA No. 76-12-2 establishing the compensation and expense reimbursement
·························· policies for Directors, adopted by the Board at the regular meeting
FllE ~ . on February 11, 1976. See page "V" ~~ ( 12.-"t-P "\LW ~)
LETT~~~----~~ Consideration of request of Garden Grove Sanitary District-,-dated -A~-,.~~~~ March 9, 1976, regarding waiver of sewer connection fees. See -~~:~1~Lfi;\ENTAL AGENDA page "VI"
(15) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn g ~ ~
(16)
i terns, if any
(17) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn 9-.~~
(18)
(19) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn g;.;;)~
-6-
(20) DISTRICT 5
'frlE ~--:~-~..: .
( LETTER f ··-·····""
ATC .... TKLR ••••
~-.. ~
Second reading on Proposed Ordinance No. 509, an Ordinance Amending
Ordinance No. 505, as amended, and Ordinance No. 508, Pertaining to
Connection Charges. See page "T"
(a)
(b)
Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 509, an Ordinance
Amending Ordinance No. 505, as amended, and Ordinance No. 508,
Pertaining to Connection Charges, by title only, and waive reading
of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of
Directors present) ~ CL.~ 9 ~
RDl.l CALL VOTE ( c)
~ "f.1Ts
Consideration of roll call vote adopting Ordinance No. 509, an
Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 505, as amended, and Ordinance
No. 508, Pertaining to Connection Charges
(21) DISTRICT 5
Othe busine agenda items, if any
FILE ....••...•..••.•..
lffiER ········{22) DISTRICT 5
A/C •••• TKLR •••• Consideration of motion to adjourn ~·. C lP
-----'"'3) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of Resolution No. 76-51-6, amending Resolution No. 73-52-6
Roll Call Vote or Cast • d f D · , · f · 1 · mb unanifous Ballot to provi e or irectors uni onn mi eage expense rei ursement for each
~\S District of the Joint Administrative Organization. See page "U"
(24) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(25) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn 3:;J7
OR
"V"
R~ll Vote or cast Consideration of Resolution No. 76-11-1, establishing the compensation and
UnanimouUBallot • b t 1 · · f · t D · t d l " R 1 t · FILE .••..••••••••••• '!. ~ expense reim ursemen po 1cies or i s irec o!s_,,... ana !e..J?ea ing eso u ions
LETTER ••••••.• !!\ Nos. 63-128 and 68-3-1. See page "W" ~
A/C _.TKLR .•••
DISTRICT 1 --····--·Q7) Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ~
-----·-····--·
(28) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn ~~3,0
rvi/@ DISTRICT 7
Roll Call Vote or Cast Consideration of Resolution No.
nous Ballot establishing annexation policy,
~ ·····i.~"fev See page "X" ~~ ~--·········-
A/C .... TKLR -~~
76-39-7, amending Resolution No. 75-44-7
re computation of annexation acreage fee.
-7-
(30) DISTRICT 7
-rti: ···········-·-(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file legal op1n1on of the
District's General Counsel relative to the request of the proponents
of annexation of the Orange Park Acres area to establish an improve-
ment district solely to pay the District annexation fees. See
·~TTER •••••••..•••••
A/~~~~~~~~: .. ~~~~N) Is
page "Y"
~-·--·····-··-······
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter fro~ Peggy L.
) McElligott, Attorney for Orange Park Association, dated January 28,
me -·······-········ ft1 \7 1976, regarding Proposal for Concurrent Annexation and Bond ~~~~ Authorization -Orange Park Acres. See page "Z"
~~k.<§) --~\ Consideration of request of Orange Park Association re annexation
cyi conditio11s therefoi;. as determined by the Board ~
\lQ.~ &9 ~ ...._ ~. 71.D -S::>-'1
(31)
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Unanimous }Jl°} FILE ................ rr\ /
LmER ····--··-
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No. 76-52-7, amending Resolution No. 73-53-7
to provide for Directors' uniform mileage expense reimbursement for each
District of the Joint Administrative Organization. See page "AA"
A/C ._.mR@ DISTRICT 7
___ Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
'...... . ......
(33) DISTRICT 7
Considerat1on of motion to adjourn q ·. fB
-8-
II
DO ARDS OF Dm~CTORS · j ... ~£l
County Sanitation Dhtricts tJ 1 /JJll"" -~. ~I.'· I·,_ I ___ ~ .. ~ -··f'l _____ fl --. of Orange County, California ~ _ _
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
JOINT BOARDS
MEETING DATE
MARCH 10, 1976 -·7:30 P.M.
(I) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll Call
(3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary
Area Code 71-4
540-2910
962-2-411
AGENDA
(4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any.
See supplemental agenda
(5) EACH DISTRICT
(6)
Consideration of motions approving minutes of th~ .. following meetings,
as mailed:
District 1 February 11, .1976 regular
District 2 February 11, 1976 regular JI>~~ District 3 February 11, 1976 regular
District 5 February 11, 1976 regular, and
March 3, 1976 special
District 6 February 11, 1976 regular
District 7 February 11, 1976 regular
District 11 February IL 1976 regular
ALL DISTRICTS
R~poTts of:
(a) Joint Chairman
(b) General Manager
(c) General Counsel
(7) ALL DI STRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive nnd file c e rtifica ti on of the
Genera l Man a ger that he has ch e cked all bills ap p ea rin g on t he aeenda,
f ound them to be in order, and that he rec omme nds a uth o ri zation for
paym e nt
(8) ALL DI ST RICTS
(8)
RGlL CAL L VO TE ............. -
ITEMS ON
SUPPLEMENTAL AGEN DA
Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating
and Capital Outlay Revol~ing Ftmd ~cco1;ffits payable check re?i:ters
for signature of the Chairma n of District No. 1, and authorizing
p ayment of claims listed on page "I" ; and approving ac c otmts
payable check re?isters for sigi;a~ure of the Chai~an of.the .
respective District, and authorizing paym ent of said claims listed
on the pages indicated below:
DISTRICT 1 wa:n'atlts, if aft)' .•..•••.•...•............ NONE
DISTRICT 2 warrants -See page "II"
DISTRICT 3 warrants -See page "II"
DISTRICTS 3 8 11 9tt5pct19 e fuftd waI'I'aRts, if atly ..... · NONE
DISTRICT 5 warrants -See page "I"
DISTRICTS 5 8 6 9u9pet1se fuftd \faFFatltS, if any ..•... NONE
DISTRICT 6 ~;arrMts, if any ..•.•....•.••.•.......... NONE
(9)
DISTRICT 7 warrants -See page
DISTRICT 11 warrants --See page
ALL DISTRICTS
"III"
"III"
Roll Call Vote or Cas t
Unan imo us Ba llot
CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEMS NOS, 9(A) THROUGH 9(s)
All matters plac ed upon the consent cal e ndar are cons ide red
as not requiring discus s ion or furth er expl a n a tion and
tmless any particular ite m is r e ques ted to be r emov ed f rom
the c onsent c a l e ndar by a Director, s t aff membe r, or memb er
of the public in att e ndance, there will be n o separate
discussion of th e se items. All ite ms on the c onsen t
calenda r will be enacted by on e acti on approvi ng al l mot i ons,
and casting a un anim o us b a llot for r es olutions included on
the cons ent cal e ndar. All ite ms remov e d from th e cons ent
calendar shall be considered in the re gular orde r · o f busin e ss.
Members of the public who wish to r em ove an item f r om the
cons ent calenda r sha ll, up on r e cognition by the chair, state
their n a me, addr es s a nd d es i gnate by lette r the item to be
r emov ed from the cons e nt calendar .
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairma n will d e termine if a ny items are to be d e l e ted fro m
the c onsent cal endar.
Con s i de ration of a c tion to app r ov e all agenda i t erns appea r ing
on th e con sent c a l e ndar not spe cifi ca lly r e mo v e d f rom same.
-2-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from City
of Huntington Beach, dated February 18, 1976, relative to
inclusion of certain street improvements in the contract for
Brookhurst Street Improvements, Job No. P2-8-8, for which the
City will reimburse the Districts. See page "A"
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-41, making.a Negative
Declaration and providing for notice thereof, and approving plans
and specifications for Brookhurst Street Improvements, Job No. P2-8-8,
and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on April 6, 1976,
said specification and proposal documents to provide separate bid
items for improvements to be performed on behalf of the City of
Huntington Beach and reimbursed to the Districts by the City.
See page "B"
(c) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-42, to receive and file bid
tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for New
Water Well No. 1 at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-049, to McCalla Bros.,
(d)
(e)
(f)
in the amount of $42,046.00. See pages "C" and "D"
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Installation of Foul Air Treatment at
Plant No. 2, Headworks "C", Job No. PW-050, authorizing a reduction
in the insurance coverage requirements for the contract with
Skipper & Company. See page "E"
Consideration of motion authorizing the Joint Chairman and
seven employees to attend the 48th Annual Conference of the
California Water Pollution Control Association to be held
April 14-16, 1976, ·at Lake Tahoe; and authorizing
reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses
incurred in connection with attendance at said conference
Consideration of motion to receive, file and refer to staff letter
from City of Santa Ana dated February 23, 1976, relative to
construction of the Raitt Street Trunk Sewer northerly of Sllllflower
Avenue. See page "F"
DISTRICT 2
(g) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans
and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Reach 5,
Contract No. 2-14-4, authorizing a change in the type of concrete
pipe, at no cost to the District. See page "G"
(h) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-43-2, approving and authorizing
execution of Pipe-Line License agreement with The Atchison,
Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company in connection with construction
of the Santa Ana River Interceptor and South Santa Ana River Inter-
ceptor Connector, Reaches 2, 3 and 4, Contract No. 2-14-3; and
authorizing payment in the amollllt of $150.00 for said license.
See page "H"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
DISTRICT 2 (Continued)
(i) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-44-2, approving and authorizing
execution of Pipe-Line License agreement with The Atchison, Topeka
and Santa Fe Railway Company in connection with construction of
the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Reaches 6, 7 and 8, Contract
No. 2-14~5; and authorizing payment in the amount of $150.00 for
said license. See page "I"
(j) Consideration of motion authorizing issuance of a change order to the
emergency purchase order contract with F. B. Cook Corporation for
additional work in the amount of $909.88, relative to reshaping of
manhole in connection with repairs at the intersection of State
College Boulevard and Orangethorpe (Newhope-Placentia Trllllk Sewer)
(k) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from C. Michael,
Inc. for annexation of approximately 295.87 acres of territory to
the District northerly of the Yorba Regional Park, and refer to staff
for study .and recommendation. See page "J"
DISTRICT 3
(1) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-45-3, approving and authorizing
execution of agreement with Southern Pacific Transportation Company
for right of way in connection with construction of the Westside
Relief Interceptor, Portion of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 and 29,
Contract No. 3-21-2, at no cost to the District. See page "K"
(m) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and First Amended
Complaint for Damages for Personnel Injuries, in Case No. 239335,
Darryl Nasser vs. Radna Balstad, et al., in connection with construction
of the Westside Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 and Portion of 27,
Contract No. 3-21-1, and refer to the District's General Collllsel and
liability insurance carrier for appropriate action.
DISTRICTS 3 & 11
(n) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-46, to receive and file bid
tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Manhole
Replacement and Repair, Contract No. 11-lR-l, to Rewes-Schock, in
the amount of $37,253.00. See pages "L" and "M"
DISTRICT 7
(o) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-47-7, authorizing acceptance of
Director's Deed from the State of California, Department of Transpor-
tation, for acquisition of excess property adjacent to the San Diego
Freeway and abutting the District's easement for the Gisler-Red Hill
Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-1, at no cost to the District. See
page "N"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5)
-4-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4)
DISTRICT 7 (Continued)
(p) Consideration of Resolution No . 76-48-7, approving and authorizing
execution of agreement with Southern Pacific Transportation Company
for right of way in connection with construction of the Tustin-Orange
Trunk Sewer, Reach 11 and Portion of Reach 12, Contract No. 7-6-7;
and authorizing payments in the amounts of $40,000.00 for permanent right
of way and $3,086.25 for temporary right of way . See page "0"
(q) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-49-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 6.647 acres of
territory to the District in the vicinity of Overhill and Miravista
Drive (Proposed Annexation No. 48 -Tract No. 5369 to County
Sanitation District No. 7)
(r) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Donald
Cray for annexation of approximately one acre of territory to the
District in the vicinity of Sanitago Canyon Road and Amapola Avenue;
and consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-50-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex said territory (Proposed
Annexation No. 53 -Cray Annexation to Cotmty Sanitation District No. 7)
See page "P"
DISTRICT 11
(s) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans
and specifications to Remodel Newland-Hamilton Pumping Station
Facilities, Contract No. 11-4R, authorizing an addition of $1,214.95
to the contract with Clifford L. Thompson Construction Company for
additional block wall and excavation and grading, and granting a time
extension of 30 calendar days to a c complish said work. See page "Q"
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
-5-
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
(12)
(13)
(a) Consideration o f motion to receive and file l etter from I rvine Ranch
Water District dated Ma r ch 4, 1976, relative to a l ternate connection
points to the Sanitation Di stri cts ' outfall system an d cos ts associ ated
therewith.pursuant to the agreemen t between the respective parties
dated January 12 , 1972. See page 11 R"
(b) Consid eration of mo tion authorizing the General Manage r to engage
John Carollo Engineers to prepare a report regarding Irvine Ranch Wa ter "
District's requ es t for informat ion re l ative to alternate connection
points to the Districts' outfall system, all cos ts of sai d study and
r eport to be borne by the Irvi n e Ran ch Water District
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to rece i ve and file f inancial report of Director of
Finance for quarter ending December 31, 1975 (Mailed with agenda material)
ALL DI STRICTS
Other business and corronunications or s upplemental agenda items , if any
(13-a) Consideration of .items relative to award of Specification No. A-080,
Six (6) 1/2 Ton Pickup Trucks (Awarded to Guaranty Chevrolet on 12/10/75):
ITEMS ON
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Guaranty
Chevrolet dated February 19, 1976, withdrawing their bid on
Specifica tion No. A-080 due to an error the r e on. See p a ge "S"
(2) Consideration of motion rejecting all bids received on De c e mber 2,
. 1975, for Specification No. A-080, Six (6) 1/2 Ton Pick up Trucks
(3) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and
reconun endation, and awarding purchase of Six (6). 1/2 Ton Pickup
Trucks, Specification No . A-080 Rebid, to Santa Ana Dod ge in the
a mount of $26,076.00. See page "IV''
t\-~ (14) DISTRICT 2 ~(:~ Oth e r business and conununica tions or supp lem ental agenda items, if any
\.~v . (14-a) Consideration of request of Director Dale T. Chaput, Councilman,
ITEMS ON City of Yorba Linda, dated March 3, 1976, to reconsider Resolution
UPPLEMENTAL AGENDA No. 76-12-2 establishing the compensation and expense reimbursement
policies for Directors, adopted by the Board at the regular meeting
(14-b)
ITEMS ON
Sul'PLE MENTA L AGENDA
on February 11, 1976. See page "V" )
. /J I
Consideration of request of Garden Grove Sanitary District, ~~ted : ~ )1') ~:;~h 9, 11 ~i~6, regarding waiver o~ sewer connection fees. Se/.~ h ~ ~~
7 [.) ~k ~f' ~ ;,.:,.".,,;:.... 1'f'-6'f ~ c ,, \<t'~
(15) DISTRICT 2 D 1..11 V .11
L II _'-o f\&rr Consideration of motion to adjourn ~:rl ·u.7 ~
(16) DISTRICT 3
(17)
(18)
(19)
Oth er business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
DI STR ICT 3 /
Consideration of motion to adjourn ~·,?'1 ..
DISTRICT 11
Other business and commun i cations or supplemental agenda items , if any
DISTRICT 11
Con s ideration of mot i on to adjourn 'D'· ...,.f
-6-
(20) DISTRICT S
.ROl.L CALL VOTE
Second reading on Proposed Ordinance No. 509, an Ordinance Amending
Ordinance No. SOS, as amended, and Ordinance No. 508, Pertaining to
Connection Charges. See page "T"
~)
(b)
(c)
Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. S09, an Ordinance
Amending Ordinance No. SOS, as amended, and Ordinance No. 508,
Pertaining to Connection Charges, by title only, and waive reading
of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of
Directors present)
Discussion and conunents, if any
11••...........-
Consideration of roll call vote adopting Ordinance No. 509, an
Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. SOS, as amended, and Ordinance
No. S08, Pertaining to Connection Charges
(21) DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(22) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(23) DISTRICT 6
V C Consideration of Resolution No. 76-51-6, amending Resolution No. 73-52-6
Roll Call ote or ast • d f D • 1 • f · 1 · Unanimous Ballot to provi e or irectors uni orm mi eage expense reimbursement for each
District of the Joint Administrative Organization. See page "U"
(24) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(25) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(26) DISTRICT 1
Roll Call Vote or Cast C?nsideration of Resolution No. 76-33-1, fixing compensation for its
unanimous Ballot Directors and rescinding Resolutions Nos. 63-128 and 68-3-1. See page "V"
OR
Roll call vote or cast Consideration of Resolution No. 76-11-1, establishing the compensation and
Unanimous Ballot expense reimbursement policies for its Directors, and repealing Resolutions
Nos. 63-128 and 68-3-1. See page "W"
(27) DISTRICT 1
(28)
(29)
Roll Call Vote or Cast
iimous Ballot
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No. 76-39-7, amending Resolution No. 75-44-7
establishing annexation policy, re computation of annexation acreage fee.
See page "X" fi ~ '. , · I J ,, k.i , /,) , ~)~, I.~~ ~ 1~1: 41.'J ~~~·~-c ~P ~· -' ~~-'''a
0 ..l t I . ~ ~ f :;.., i'4-·: .' ,. I <,, --
M,1X .. _ .. · -~~ ~, P~ , t re -. '-
1 , r , .r.;-. . . . .1 1 . . -· .• .ft /) ~/Cr:~ ,, ·;t,. .. t ( ;i.''J. ;,,_, _ ~""'i'' ~~~J ),. ,;,~}:'~ ,..-.~:d;)
(30) DISTRICT 7
(31)
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Unanimous Ballot
(32)
I (33)
~.
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file legal op1n1on of the
District's General Counsel relative to the request of the proponents
of annexation of the Orange Park Acres area to establish an improve-
ment district solely to pay the District annexation fees. See
page "Y"
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Peggy L.
McElligott, Attorney for Orange Park Association, dated January 28,
· 1976, regarding Proposal for Concurrent Annexation and Bond
Authorization -Orange Park Acres. See page "Z"
(c) Consideration of request of Orange Park Association re annexation
and conditions therefor, as determined by the Board
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No. 76-52-7, amending Resolution No. 73-53-7
to provide for Directors' uniform mileage expense reimbursement for each
District of the Joint Administrative Organization. See page "AA"
DISTRICT 7 ),
Other business and comrn~ica~i,ons o'r. _ s~pleme~~l -.agen~ _i te', ~r any /1 ~..6P.1.-
DISTRICT 7 ~,.I { 1 (c ,-! J,_ I . e_,i , j·~"~" ,.._.. ''iu f;c ~ U
Consideration of motion to adjo~ I J .. i 1)., .. f., ()~· /> , ) tJ
( /! I J: . ') ~ ~ .. ~. ,£t:_ )lt-t" . . , / c_ J(l)t·· "'.. , I
· ' An.A i,1 (/ '-I''· .... c~
I ( ·' q· (..'
·~ ).l ;_.
Ii l
' ,If /:/'}fl
1.,1./.f/'· tJ
I, I •"
/ ... ,
i C! 'I_~• _;" '-·.
tj ! ~ I .. :,. c
' ' (
(
II
.·
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS
MARCH 10, 1976 -7:30 P.M.
ALL .DISTRICTS
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 71 4
540-2910
962-2411
AG EH DA
(8) Consideration of roll call vote motion approvin g Joint Op erating
and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund accounts payable check r egiste rs
for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and auth orizing
payment of claims listed on page "I" ; and approving accounts
payable check registers for signature of the Chairman of the
respective District, and authorizing payment of said claims listed
on the pages indicated below :
DISTRICT 1 W0:I'1:'0:Hts, if aey ...•......•...•.•...•.•.. NO NE
DISTRICT 2 warrants See page -----"II"
DISTRICT 3 warrants -See page "II"
DISTRICTS 3 & 11 suspeftse fURd W0:l:'l'O:Rts, if 1:my •••.• NONE
DISTR.ICT 5 warrants -See page "I"
DISTRICTS 5 & 6 suspeHse. fuREl wal'l'ants , if any . . . . . . NO NE
DISTRICT 6 wa:rrMts , if any . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . NONE
DISTRICT 7 warrants -See page __ "I_I_I_'_' _
DISTRICT 11 warrants -See page __ '_'I_I_I_"~-
(13-a) Consideration of items relative to award of Sp e cification No. A-080,
Six (6) 1/2 Ton Pickup Trucks (Awarded to Guaranty Chevrolet on 12/10/75):
(1) Consideration of motion to -receive and f i l e letter from Guaranty
Chevrolet dated February 19, 1976, withdr awin g t h eir bid on
Specification No. A-080 due to an error the reon. See page "S"
(2) Consideration of motion rejecting all bids received on December 2,
1975, for Specifica tion No. A-080, Six (6) 1/2 Ton Pickup Trucks
(3) Considera tion of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation, and awarding purchase of Six (6) 1/2 Ton Pickup
Trucks, Specification No. A-080 Rebid, to Santa Ana Do dge in the
amount of $26,076.00 . See pa ge "IV"
DISTRICT 2
(14-a) Consideration of r e quest of Director Dale T . Chaput, Councilman,
City of Yorba Linda, dated March 3, 1976, to reconsider Resolution
No. 76-12-2 establishing the compensation and expense reimbursement
policies for Directors, adopted by the· Board at the regul a r meeting
on February 11, 19 76. See page "V"
(14-b) Consideration of request of Garden Grove Sanitary District, dated
March 9, 1976, regarding waiver of sewer connection fees. See
page "VI"
'·
-2-
'WARRANT NO.
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
28905
28906
~8907
~908
~0909
28910
28911
28912
28913
28911.l
28915
28916
28917
28918
28919
28920
28921
28922
28923
28924
28925
28926
28927
28928
28929
28930
28931
28932
28933
28934
28935
28936
28937
28938
28939
28940
2891.ll
28942
28943
28944
.28945
28946
28947
28948
28949
28950
28951
28952
28953
28954
28955
?B956
~957 20958
"I-1"
A & S Building Maintenance Co., Janitorial Service
ALZ Industrial Pump Division, Pump Repair
Acme Canvas Products, Test Materials
Air California, Air Fare, Various Meetings
.Airdraulic, Pump Parts
Air Seals Corporation, Engine Parts
All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings, Hose & Couplings
Allied Supply Company, Valves & Pipe Supplies
Almquist Tool & Equipment, Hardware
American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts
American Controls, Valves
American Cyanamid Company, Chemicals
city of Anaheim, Power
Anaheim Sewer Construction, Lateral Repair
The Anchor Packing Co., Pump Packing
V. B. Anderson Co., Tools
Anixter Purzan, Hardware
N. T. Bailey, JPL Lockers
Bank of America, Bond & Coupon Collection
Banning Battery Company, Batteries
Beckman Instruments, Controls
John G. Bell Co., Barscreen Parts
Better Rents, Equipment Rental
Black & Decker Mfg. Co., Equipment Parts
Blower Paper Company, Tape
Boyle Engineering Corp., Plant 2 Facilities Plan
Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment exams
CS Company, Valves & Pump Parts
CWPCA, Safety Seminar Registration
Cadillac Plastic & Chemical Co., Plexiglas
Cal-State Seal Company, Gasket Material
Cal's Cameras, Photo Processing & Supplies
Calif. Asso~iation of Sanitary Agencies, Workshop
Registration
California Collator Sales, Specification Supplies
Carmenita Ford Truck Sales, Inc., Truck Parts
R. L. Carson, Employee Mileage
R. B. Clapp Co., Inc., Controls
Clark Dye Hardware, Tools
Coast Nut & Bolt Co., Steel & Hardware
College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials
Consolidated Electrical Distbrs., Electric Supplies
Continental Chemical Co., Chlorine
Control Specialists, Inc., Regulator Parts
c. W. Corum, Lateral Repair
Leelon L. Cory, Employee Mileage
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
Costa Mesa County Water District, Water
County Wholesale Electric, Electric Supplies
Crane·Veyor Corporation, Digester Repair
Charles P. Crowley Co. , F'reight
Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lao Supplies
Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies
Daniels Tire Service, Truck Tires
C. R. Davis Supply Co., Pipe Supplies & Hose
AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
366.00
806.00
12.50
160.70
ll4.75
36.95
526.97
1,324.49
10.97
213.80
J.n5.13
9,21.ll.64
228.92
ll50.oo
380.31
109.lJ8
215.25
127 .·20
446.30
408.73
204.43
379.88
27.40
15.00
169.43
8,500.00
13.00
874.54
97.50
73.61
64.08
288.42
200.00
170.lJO
36.38
11.40
778.76
33.92
110.31
77.17
702.72
3,097.10
341. 94
400.00.
5.25
580.37
6.oo
149.20
2,500.00
10.35
40.00
178.76
169.39
1,030.04
"I-1"
WARRANT NO.
28959
28960
28961
28962
28963
28964
28965
.28966
2tl967
28968
28969
28970
28971
28972
28973
28974
28975
28976
28977
28978
28979
28980
28981
28982
28983
28984
28985
28986
28987
28988
28989
28990
28991
28992
·28993
.. 28994
28995
28996
28997
28998
28999
29000
29001
29002
29003
29004
29005
29006
29007
29008
29009
29010
29011
29012
29013
29014
"l-2"
IN FAVOR OF
Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling $
Diamond-Newport Ice Co., Sampling Supplies
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies & Printing
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Services
Fibre Glass Evercoat Co., Inc., Freight
Fischer & Porter Company, Instrument Supplies & Charts
-Fluid Tech, Regulator
City of Fountain Valley, Water
Compressor Products Division, Compressor Repair
City of Fullertnn, Water
General Electric Supply, Electric Supplies
General Telephone Company
Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage
Goldenwest Fertilizer Co., Grit Removal
GOodyear Tire Center, Truck Tires
M. E. Gray Co., Valves & Hardware
Graybar Electric Company, Electric Supplies
Hanson's Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies
Charles G. Hardy, Inc., Hardware
Harrington Industrial Plastics, Pipe Supplies
Michael Heinz, Employee Mileage
Hennig, Inc., Truck Repair
Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease
Hilti Fastening Systems, Hardware
Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires
Honeywell, Inc., Strip Charts
Hopper Service Parts Co., Truck Parts
Howard Supply Company, Hardware, Tools & Pipe Supplies
City of Huntington Beach, Water
IDS Corporation, Office Supplies
Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Freight
International Harvester Co., Truck Parts
Irvine Ranch Water District, Water
J & M Service, Equipment Parts
Jensen Instrument Company, Controls
Keenan Pipe &·supply Company, Pipe Supplies
King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, V-Belts & Pump Parts
Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts
Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies
Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware
L. A. Dodge Construction News, Legal Notice P2-23
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tools & Tool Repair
L & N Uniforms Supply Co., Uniform Service
The Lacal Company, Inc., Pump Packing
Lakewood Pipe Service, Freight
Larsen-Hogue Electric, Electric Supplies
Lawson Products, Inc., Hardware
Lewco Electric Company, Truck Repair
McCoy Ford Tractor, Equipment & Tractor Parts
McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Tools, Gauges & Hardware
Master Blueprint & Supply, Blueprints & Printing
Morgan Equipment Company, Equipment Parts
Motorola, Inc., Communication Equipm~nt
Nalco Chemical Company, Chemicals
National Chemsearch, 8olvent & Cleaner
National Lumber Supply, Building Materials
AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
295.00
15.90
703.95
3,000.00
12."C)
478 .'-1(
291.67
40.00
70.00
6.08
2,985.41
1,876.91
43. 26
1,296.00
182.32
448.67
38.03
57.20
109.56
418. 55
4.20
175.51
743.51
169.60
357.94
58.12
30.43
3,370.98
144.35
224.64
8.50
8.14
1.75
20.99
68. 74
66.11
173.24
584.32
251.38
48.34
330.00
579.53
1,973.29
538.91
17.93
255.16
47. 24.
51.82
234.92
644.21
46.06
67 .. 76
198.72
1,280.52
1, 182.)
68.~
"l-2"
. WARRANT NO.
29015
29016
29017
29018
".>(}020
IN FAVOR OF
City of Newport Beach, Water
Nolex Corporation, Reproduction Supplies
Office Equipment Specialists, Equipment Repair
Orange County Water District, Replenishment Tax
Orange Valve & F~tting Co., Hardware ·
Overhead Door Company, Warehouse Doors
·Pacific Telephone C9mpany
M. c. Patten Corporation, Gauges
Petroleum Dynamics, Pump Parts
Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies
Tom Ponton, Inc., Pump Parts
Printec Corporation, Reproduction Supplies
Quality Building Supply, Building Materials
Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal
The Register, NPDES Notice, Bid Notice 11-lR-l
The Republic Supply Co., Pipe Supplies
Richey Electronics, Inc., Electric Supplies
Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts & Pump
Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing
AMOUNT
485.09
1,062.01
58.27
431.20
10.55
2,045.80
452.12
252.08
4.90
691.99
27.85
288.43
533.70
64.oo
& Su~scription 171.56
249.37
462.83
4,840.20
57.18
348.12
~021
29022
29023
29024
29025
29026
29027
29028
29029
29030
29031
29032
29033
29034
29035 29036 ..
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motor & Motor Repair
Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies · -eo·.75-· ~
29037
. 29038--
29039
29040
29041
29042
29043
29044
29045
29046
29047
29048
29049
29050
29051
29052
29053
29054
29055
29056
29057
29058
29059
.29060
29061
29062
29063
29064
29065
29066
29067 29068
29069
':'<1070
___.-071
"l-3"
Scientific Products, Lab Supplies
··seal Methods,·rnc., Gaskets
See Optics, Safety Glasses
s. F. Serrantino, Employee Mileage
Shepherd Machinery Co., Equipment Parts
Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies
John Sigler, Employee Mileage
Signal-Flash Company, Barricade Rental
Southern California Edison Company
South Orange Supply, Pipe Supplies
Southern California Gas Company
Southern California Water Company
Sparkletts Drinking Water Corporation, Bottled Water
Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Standard Oil Company of.Calif., Gasoline & Diesel Fuel
Sterling Art & Engineering Supply, Drafting Supplies
Surveyor's Service Company, Tools
. T-Girl Temporary Employment, Temporary Warehouse Help
Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage & Water Conf .· Expense c. O. Thompson Petroleum Co., Kerosene
Trexler Compressor, Inc., Compressor Parts
Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts
Tustin Water Works, Water
Union Oil Company of Calif., Gasoline
United Parcel Service, Freight-out
United Reprographics, Inc., Industrial Waste Ord. Printing
United States Elevator Corp., Maintenance Agreement
University of Calif., Irvine Regents, JPL Computer Model
Van Waters & Rogers, Chemicals
VWR Scientific, Test Supplies
Varec~ Inc., Freight
Wallace & Tiernan, Chlorinator Parts
Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage
'John R. Waples, R.s., Odor Consultant
Waste King Universal, Equipment Repair
AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
24.59 .. :to3 ~-62---.
. . 29.68
22.50
74.02
494.90
12.75
98.50
47,562.49
125.45
1,833.12
. . 3.24
165.57
234.11
·4,868.42
51.64
32.35
166.88
102.00
198.78
891.41
966.55
167-.09
11.36
32.94
1,618.21
33.00
247 .46
2,599.72
103.10
10.25
437 .!to
43.50
212.90
27.50
"l-3"
r
WARRANT NO.
29072
29073
29074
29075
29076
29077
29078
28877
28878
28879
28886
28881
. 28882
28883
28884
28885
28886
28887
"28888
28889
28890
28891
28892
28893
28894
28895
28896
28897
28898
28899
28900
28901
28902
28903
28904
"I-4"
IN FAVOR OF
Western Wholesale Company, Equipment Parts
Wilson Ford Sales, Truck Parts
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage
Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Services
Everett H. York Company, Filters
Zodiac Paper Company, Printing Supplies.
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
$
$
·AMOUNT
32.59
189.53
5,101.50
27.18
1,457 -~
202. :n
52.53
146,549.63
Analytical Measurements, PH Recorder $ 969.00
4,134.oo Calgon Corp., Activated Carbon for ACTS
John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Serv., ACTS, Fae. Plan &
J-6-1
County Sanitation Dist. 2 of L. A., Solids Management
Daily Pilot, Bid Notice A-080
Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16
Envirotech-Sparling, Carbon Analysis
Elwood H. Fairchild, JPL Consultant
J. B. Gilbert & Associates, Fae. Plan & P2-23 EIR
J. Putnam Henck, Contractor, JPL-ACTS
Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Management Pl-16
Howard Supply Company, Pipe
Instrument Specialj_st Company, JPL Programmer
Motorola, Inc., Mobile Radio & Communication Equipment
Olympic Signs, JPL Signs
Pepsi Co. Bldg. Systems, Inc.: JPL Equipment Rental c. E. Raymond/Bartlett-Snow, JPL Kiln
The Register, Bid Notice PW-049
Rockwell International, Calculator
Thomas·J. Rush, Lathe
Sales Engineers Limited, Polymer Tank
·Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Incubator
Smith Emery Company, Testing Pl-16
Jack R. Strobel, MAI, Plant 2 Land Appraisal
Taylor Instruments, JPL Flowmeters
Twining Laboratories, Concrete Test
Up-Right Scaffolds, Scaffolding
Wyle Laboratories, Cqnsultant Pl-16
TOTAL CORF
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF
AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
·-25,473.48
65,000.00
9.11
795,809.43
9,808.03
276.00
6,708.27
238,862.87
12,484.51
1,419. 34
72·0.80
2,483.63
530.00
861·.86
195,000.00
97.00
213.27
9,795.10
4,629.78
3,194.84
52.00
650.00
29,906.40
15.00
3Lt5. 56
532.00
$ 1,409,981.28
$ 1,556,530.91
. "-"
"l-4"
DISTRICT NO. 2
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
t~T NO. IN FAVOR OF
28854 Precision Anodizing, Refund IW Permit Overpayment
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
28855 A.T. & S.F. Railroad Company, Santa Ana River Interceptor Payments
28856 John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contractor 2-14-3
28857 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 2-15
28858 J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation, Contractor 2-15
28859 Kasler Corp. & L.H. Woods, JV., Contractor 2-14-4
28860 Kraemer IV, Easement 2-17-1
28861 Long Beach Iron Works, Inc., Contractor 2-14-4
28862 Lowry and Associates, Engineering Services 2-15, 2-17-2
28S63"'Smith Emery Company, Pipe· Testing 2-14-3, 2-14-4, 2-14-5
28864 S.S. Zarubica, Contractor 2-14-5
DISTRICT NO. 3
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
28865 Los Alamitos General Hospital, Refund IW Permit Overpayment
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
·28866 Boyle Engineering Corp., Engineering Services 3-20, 3-20-1, 3-21-2
28867 County of Orange, Compaction Testing, 3-2_0-l, 3-20-2, 3-21-1
28868 Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing, 3-20-1, 3-20-2
28869 Southern California Testing Laboratory, Soils Testing 3-21-1
28870 Sully-Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 3-20-1
28871 A.G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N.M. Saliba Co., Contractor 3-20-2
"11-1" AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
Af.l:lUNT
$ 73.32
$ 300.00
30,297.60
80.89
27,740.48
795,447.00
23,750.00
162.18
3,048.00
3,796.00
33,693.61
$ 918,315.76
$ 918,389.08
$ 17.50
$ 12,997.00
339.54
962.00
72.00
287,953.60
353,477.00
$ 655, 801.14
$ 655,818.64
"11-1"
WARRANT NO.
DISTRICT NO. 5
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
28872 City of Newport Beach, Connection Fee Administration
"II-2" AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
AMO--f
524.75
"11-2"
r
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
W~T NO •. IN FAVOR OF
28873 Local Agency Formation Commission, Annexation #53 Processing Fee
28874 Shelton & Associates, Right-of-Way Appraisal
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
28875 Irvine Industrial Complex, Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement
DISTRICT NO. 11
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
28876 Clifford L. Thompson Construction Co., Contractor ll-4R
"III" AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
AMOUNT
25.00
499.50
$ 524.50
$ 119, 806. 27
$ 120,330.77
$ 10,627.25
"III"
"IV"
.• BID TABULATION
SHEET
Date ..
Contract For: SIX (6) 1/2 TON PICKUP TRUCKS .
SPECIFICATION NO. A-080 REBID
..
BIDDER
1 •. Santa Ana J?odge
Santa Ana
2. Guaranty Chevrolet Motors
Santa Ana
3. Wegge Dodge
Pasadena
4. Wilson Ford
Huntington Beach
5. Tiieodore Robbins, Inc.
Costa Mesa
6. McCoy & Mi 11 s Ford
Fullerton
7. Smith-Ford
Garden Grove
8. McCoy Ford
Anaheim
9. El Camino Ford
San Clemente
10. Birch Ford
La Habra
11. Peck Road Ford Truck Sales
Whittier
March 9, 1976
11:00 a.m~
TOTAL BID
$ 26,076.00
26",508.99
26,563.68
26,615.39
27,030.00
27,248.21
27,506.75
27,609.72
27, 717 .45
28,492.80
29,499.02
It is recommended that award be made to Santa Ana Dodge, 1401 North Tustin Ave.,
Santa Ana, CA, in the amount ·of $26,076.00 as the lowest and best bid.
v11e~
W. N. Clarke
Superintendent
AGENDA ITEM #13(A)(3) -ALL DISTRICTS II IV"
CITY OF YORBA LINDA 0 Telephone .524-5000
Poat Offico Box A • 4845 M•ln Street • Yorb• Lind•, C•lifomia 92606
March 3, 1976
Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District No. 2
Post Off ice Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Dear Directors:
This letter is being submitted to all Orange County cities as well as the
Sanitation Districts which make up District No. 2 due to various improprieties
which occurred at a recent Orange County Sanitation District meeting.
I am greatly concerned that a group of elected officials,"once removed from
the voting public by a special taxing district, have chosen to increase their
salaries and allowed unlimited expenses through the secre.tive tactic of a
voice vote.
In this regard I challenge the legality of the Resolution authorizing salaries
and expenses because of the irregular process in which it was adopted. I
therefore request that Sanitation District No. 2 void the previous action taken
on Resolution 76-12-2 and reconsider it at the March 10, 1976 meeting.
Among the irregularities:
1) The Joint Chairman faila:Ito follow his· own announced procedures.
2) District No. 2 Chairman did not conduct the meeting nor call for the roll
call vote.
3)· No roll call vote was taken although legal counsel indicated that that was
the proper procedure.
4) A request from the floor for a roll call vote was denied by the District
No. 2 Chairman, Mr. Callahan.
Attached is Exhibit "A", a summary of the events which took place at the February
meeting. In view of these events, I strongly urge reconsideration of Resolution
No. 76-12-2 and specifically request a roll call vote.
Sincerely,
p ~~ --?-eA7-.~f
Dale T. Chaput, Councilman
City of Yorba Linda
* * * * BIRTHPLACE OF RICHARD NIXON -37th PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES * * **
"V-1" AGENDA ITEM #14(A) -DISTRICT 2 "V-1"
, ,
"V-2"
EXHIBIT "A"
During the January Joint Meeting Resolution 76-11~1 was presented
by the Executive Committee proposing to increase the compensation and
reimbursements for Directors expenses. Since some Directors did not
believe the increases were appropriate they requested that the item be
continued to the February meeting so they could consult with their
Councils.
At the February meeting the item was reconsidered by each District
and voted on. My complaint relates to the manner in which this voting
occurred.
The Joint Chairman announced at the beginning of this agenda item,
that each district would consider this item separately and that each
District Chairman would preside over the proceeding for his District.
This fonnat was followed in District #1 and a roll call vote was called
to settle the matter. However, when District #2 took up the matter,
discussion was generally chaired by the Joint Chairman and not the
District Chainnan .. After the discussion the Joint Chairman, with some
anxiety, called for a voice vote instead of a roll call vote, even though
he had been advised by general counsel that a roll callvote was in order.
I talked to the Joint Chairman prior to taking a new agenda item
requesting that a roll call vote be taken. In order not to interrupt
the proceedings of the other Dist~icts, he suggested we do it in the
other business category on the agenda prior to District #2's adjournment.
At this point in the agenda he refused to call the roll call vote
and turned the meeting over to Mike Callahan, Chairman of District #2
who had not chaired the original voice vote. Mike refused to allow the
roll call vote, thus due process was circumvented and power politics was
at it's worst. When a Director votes himself a raise he should be willing
to record his vote and not hide behind a voice vote. This is both unethical
and illegal and gives the public more reasons to suspect their elected
officials.
AGENDA ITEM #14(A) -DISTRICT 2 "V-2"
.,
11391 ACACIA PARKWAY, P. O. BOX 1437 • JEFFERSON 4·3943 • GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA 92642
March 9, 1976
County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127 . ·
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention:
Dear Fred:
Fred Harper,
General Manager
The Sanitary District is in the process of forming a
Special Assessment District under the Street Improvement Act
of 1911 or 1913 for the purpose of financing the construction
of sewers to serve 21 homes constructed in Garden Grove on
Ranchero Way and Ranchero Place in 1952.
While reviewing the cost of this project, it was noted
that the County Sanitation District fees totaled $4620, which
represents over 46% of the estimated construction cost of
$10,000.
Because this is a low income. neighborhood, the combina-
tion of construction costs, fees, and incidental expenses
would create an unusual financial hardship on the residents
which may ultimately lead them to abandon the project; there-
fore, after considering that these residents have been paying
'taxes to the County Sani ta ti on District for a number of years
without receiving any direct benefits, the Board of Directors
of the Garden Grove Sanitary District voted unanimously at
their last meeting to request the County Sanitation District
to waive the connection fee of $220.00 per unit.
In keeping with its policy· to minimize the sewer connec-
tion expenses to the users whenever unusual costs are incurred
by them, the Sanitary District expects to waive its Sewer Service
Use Fee.
Your consideration in this matter will be appreciated.
BP/bf
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ROBERT H. MAIN, P"r:31or:H1'; WALTER M. BRESSEL, 6EeRETARV; DR. SHELDON S. SINGER: NORMAN E. CULVER; F!OBERT PERRY
"VI II AGENDA ITEM #14(B) -DISTRICT 2 "V.I II
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
MARCH 10) 1976 -7:30 P.M.
II A"
: ~-"~-~"}) City of Huntington Beach
• ~"t :3;.~ P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ~ l~ jj ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
February 18, 1976
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
P.O. Box 8217
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
Subject: Brookhurst Street Improvements
Gentlemen:
Reference is made to your letter of January 13, 1976,
which covers proposed work on Brookhurst Street adjacent to
Treatment Plant No. 2. We are in agreement with the split in
the scope of work to be paid by the District and the City, with
the exception that the structural section should be increased
from 3" A.C. over 10" A.B. to 4" A.C. over 12" A.B.
Accordingly the cost of the work items to be paid by the
District will amount to approximately $200,000.00, and those
items to be paid by the City will amount to approximtely $53,000.00.
It is assumed you will receive and review a minimum of three bids
and give us an opportunity to review same. I intend to present
this proposal to the City Council at the meeting of March 1, 1976.
Very truly yours,
~~
Director of Public Works
HEH:ae
AGENDA ITEM #9(A) -ALL DISTRICTS II A"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-41
MAKING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND PROVIDING
FOR NOTICE THEREOF, AND APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NO. P2-8-8
A RESOLUTION OF Tiffi BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
MAKING A NEGATiVE DECLARATION AND PROVIDING
FOR NOTICE THEREOF, AND APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR BROOKHURST STREET IMPROVE-
MENTS, JOB NO. P2-8-8
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the project concerning which this determination is made is
described as follows:
Brookhurst Street Improvements, Job No. P2-8-8
Section 2. That, whereas, an initial study and an Environmental Impact
Assessment, which said assessment is attached hereto as Exhibit "A", of the
environmental effects of said project has been undertaken and completed by the
Districts, and the results thereof have been reviewed by this Board; and,
Section 3. That, for the following reasons it is hereby found that said
project will not have a significant effect on the environment:
(a) There is no conflict with environmental plans and the goals
that have been adopted by the City of Huntington Beach where
the project is located.
(b) The project will have no substantial detrimental affects on
air or water quality.
(c) The completed project will be beneficial inasmuch as it will
help protect the safety of the pedestrian and vehicular traffic
on Brookhurst Street and aid in the collection and proptr
disposal of flood waters; and,
"B-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "B-1"
Section 4. lbat the detailed plans, specifications, and contract documents
this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Clifford A. Forkert, Civil
Engineer, Districts' Engineer for construction of said proj~ct, are hereby
approved and adopted; and,
Section S. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for
bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of
the State of California; and,
Section 6. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m., April 6, 1976,
at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 7. That the Secretary and the Districts' Engineers be authorized
to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors; and,
Section 8. Th.at the Secretary be, ,and is hereby authorized and instructed
to file a certified copy of this resolution and of the aforesaid initial study at
the Districts' office to be available for public inspection and copying; and,
Section 9. Th.at County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized to
award contract for said Job No. P2-8-8 on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2,
3, 5, 6, 7, and 11.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 10, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #9(B) -ALL DISTRICTS
'
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALtfORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9/7 1'l8
(71.C) 5.C0-2910
(7 l .C) 962-2.C l 1
March 4, 1976
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Name of Project: Brookhurst Street Improvements, Job No. P2-8-8
Location: 22212 Brookhurst St., Huntington Beach
Entity or Person Undertaking Project:
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Staff Determination
The District's staff, having undertaken and completed an initial study
of this project in accordance with Section 31 of the District's guidelines
entitled "Local Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality
Act of 1970, as Amended", for the purpose of ascertaining whether the proposed
project might have a significant effect on the environment, has reached the
following conclusion:
"B-3"
The project could not have a significant effect on the
environment; therefore, a negative declaration should
be prepared.
AGENDA ITEM #9(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "B-3"
II C"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-42
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR ,JOB NO. PW-049
A RESOLlITION OF TIIE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR NEW
WATER WELL NO. 1 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB
NO. PW-049 I
I
* * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6,
7, and 11 of Orange County, California,
·DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards
of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer, that award ~f contract be made to
McCalla Bros. for NEW WATER WELL NO. 1 AT PLANT NO. l, JOB"NO. PW-049, and the
bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and
ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That the contract for said Job No. PW-049 be awarded to ~kCalla
Bros. in the total amount of $42,046.00, in accordance with the terms of their
bid and the prices contained therein; and,
Section 3. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected,
and'that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders; and,
Section 4. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized to
award contract for said Job No. PW-049 on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2,
3, 5 , 6 , 7 , and 11.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 10, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #9(c) -ALL DISTRICTS II C"
"D"
Engineer's Estimate: $50,000.00
BID TABULATION
SHEET
Date March 2, 1976 -11:00 A.M.
Contract For: .NEW WATER WELL NO. 1 AT PLANT NO. 1
1.
2.
3.
4.
5 •
. 6.
8.
9.
10.
JOB NO. PW-049
CONTRACTOR
McCall a Bros.
.Santa Ana
Baylek Drilling, Inc.
La Habra
AGENDA ITEM #9(c) -ALL DISTRICTS
TOTAL BID
$42,046.00
$44,580.00
"D"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. ____ l~~----------~~
CO~ACTOR: SKIPPER & COMPANY DATE ~larch 3, 1976
-----------~---------~~----------------~---------------------------~---
JOB: Installation of Foul Air Treatment at Plant Number 2, Headworks "C", Job No. PW-050
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ o.oo
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from. the contr~ct price are hereby appr~ved.
Revise insurance requirements for job.
Public Liability and Property Damage
One person·
More than one person
Property damage
Motor Vehicle Pub lie Liability and Property Damage
One person
More than one person
Property damage
Specified requirements were excessive for job of this size.
Originally
Specified Changed to
$i,ooo,ooo
$3,000,000
·$ 500, 000
$ 200,000
$ 500,000
$ 100,000
$ 300,000
$1,000,000
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
$ 300,000
$ 100,000
Original Contract Price $ 14 7, 969. 00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ _______ o_._o_o __ ~--~
$ 0.00 ------------------This Change (ADD) (DE DUCT)
Amended Contract Price $ 147,969.00
Board authorization date: March 10, 1976 Approved:
By
-------------------~--~~~~~--Cons u J ting Engineer
By ------------------------------------Contractor
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, California
By------------------~~--.:-:-:-~~~-Ch i e f Enyir:ecr
II E" AGENDA ITEM #9(n) -ALL DISTRICTS II E"
II F"
CITY OF SANT A ANA
DEPARTMENT OF PLJRLIC \VORKS (714) 834 ... 4931
.20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA • SANTA ANA • CALIFORNIA 92701
·,
Mr. Ray Lewis
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Dear Ray:
SUBJECT: RAITT STREET SEWER
February 23, 1976
Last October a meeting was held at your offices to discuss the timing for
the construction of the Raitt Street sewer trunk northerly from Sunflower
Avenue.
At the meeting it was agreed that the City would establish a precise plan
for the alignment of Raitt Street between Sunflower Avenue and Alton Avenue
so that the District would be able to commence the design of the trunk line
and possibly acquire the necessary sewer easement across the presently un ...
developed properties if the actual dedication and improvement of the roadway
appeared to be delayed till further in the future. The precise alignment
for Raitt Street has now been determined. The actual adoption of this align-
ment by the City Council requires the preparation of an Environmental Impact
Report and a public hearing procedure as required by City code. However,
I am enclosing for your information a copy of the precise alignment so that
your staff might commence on preliminary activities at this time and not
have to wait for the formal adoption of the alignment by the City Council.
We have been in contact with the Segerstroms regarding this alignment and
have heard no objections. We are presently in the process of preparing
the Environmental Impact Report and it is felt that the precise alignment can
be fully adopted by the first of May of this year.
It is requested that the District take the necessary actions to budget for
the construction of this trunk line and establish an early schedule for the
implementation of the project.
Encl: Copy of Precise Alignment
AGENDA ITEM #9(F) -DISTRICT 1 II F"
\;VVl'Cl I ~/\1'4.l. lf\I J.UN Ul~ lt<lt.I~ Ut-Ut<AN(.Jt: COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAI.N VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
KASLER CORPORATION & C.O. N0. ___ 3~~----~~~~~---
cor !ACTOR: L. H. WOODS & SONS, INC. DAT.E March 4, 1976
'-"'
JOB: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH 5, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) {DEDUCT) $ o.oo
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
contract work are hereby authorized and as co~pensation therefor, the following additions to ·or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Provide standard prestressed reinforced concrete
pipe in lieu of standard reinforced concrete pipe.
The Contractor has elected to use the transition
with D-load pipe as an alternate provided for in
the detailed specificatons.
·.
No cost to the District. Any additional cost shall be borne by the contractor.
No time extension this change order.
Change order approved by· State on February 6,, 1976.
Original Contract Price $ 4,240,957.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ (5, 180. 00)
This Change (ADD) (DE DUCT) $ o.oo
Amended Contract Price $ 4,235,777«00
3oard authorization date: March 10,, 1976 App roved:
3y_
Consulting Engineer
3y
-------------------------------~----ContrcJctor
COUNTY SANiTATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, California
By
--------------------~~~~~~-Chic f Engineer
II G" AGENDA ITEM #9(G) -DISTRICT 2 II G"
II H II
RESOLUTION NO. 76-43-2
AUlllORTZING EXECUTION OF PIPE-LINE LICENSE AGREEMENT
WITH THE ATCllISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY
COMPANY FOR RIGHT OF WAY RE CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AUTIIORIZING EXECUTION OF A PIPE-LINE LICENSE AGREEMENT
WIIB THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
FOR RIGHT OF WAY IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF
THE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR AND SOUTH SANTA ANA
RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONNECTOR, REACHES 2, 3 AND 4,
CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3
~ * * * * * * * *· * *
Tile Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County,
California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. Tilat the certain Pipe Line License Agreement, dated June 26,
1975, wherein The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company grants to County
Sanitation District No. 2 the right to construct the Santa Ana River Interceptor
and South Santa Ana River Interceptor Connector, Reaches 2, 3 and 4, Contract
No. 2-14-3, through the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company right of
way in La Palma Avenue, easterly of Grove Street, .is hereby approved and accepted;
and,
Section 2. That payment in the amount of $150.00 for use of said right of
way is hereby authorized; and,
Section 3. Tirnt the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District, in
form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 10, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #9(H) -DISTRICT 2 II H II
II I II
RESOLUTION NO. 76-44-2
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF PIPE-LINE LICENSE AGREEMENT
WITH THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA J\J\JD SANTA FE RAILWAY
COMPANY FOR RIGHT OF WAY RE CONTRACT NO. 2-14-5
A RESOLlITION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A PIPE-LINE LICENSE AGREEMENT
WITH THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
FOR RIGl-IT OF WAY IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF
THE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACHES 6, 7
AND 8, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-5
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County,
California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Pipe Line License Agreement, dated September 8,
1975, wherein The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company grants to County
Sanitation District No. 2 the right to construct the Santa Ana River Interceptor
Sewer, Reaches 6, 7 and 8, Contract No. 2-14-5, through the Atchison, Top~ka and
Santa Fe Railway Company right of way near the Green River Golf Course at the
Orange County-San Bernadino County line, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That payment in the amount of $150.00 for use of said right of
way is hereby authorized; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District,
in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 10, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #9(1) -DISTRICT 2 II I II
"J-1"
C. MICHAEL, INC. • • DUILDER.B AND DlCVIDLO~ER.0
P.O. BOX 878 • a CSOl DOLS A AVE .• MIDWAY CITY, CALIF. g a a l5 l5
PHONES• (714) B9:3·Sl530 • (BlS) 430-t5l517 • (714) CsS4·C5498
February 9, 1976
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
District No. 2
Re: Pe ti ti on for l\nnexation
to O.C.S.D. No. 2
Gen tlernen:
We hereby request annexation of the herein described property
to Sanitation District No. 2. Submitted herewith is the
following information pertaining to our petition for annexation
to said District No. 2.
1. Legal Description -(see attached)
2. Map -(see attached)
3.
4.
Name
(a)
of Record Owner:
C . Mi ch a e 1 , Inc .
8501 Bolsa Avenue
Midway City, California
893-3536
Note: The above named company will be owner of Record
prior to completion of annexation proceedings. Their
interest in said property will be 100%.
(b) Number of people residing on said property = None
Assessed Valuation:
There are 3 parcels
annexation a~ shown
Assessors No.
(a)# 351-021-27
(b)# 351-031-12
(c)# 351-031-07
within the Boundary of the proposed
on the latest Assessors Map 'Book,
Latest Assessed Valuation
$171,250.00
$121,500.00
$ 42,750.00
Total Assessed Valuation $335,500.00
5. Area to be annexed= 295.87 Acres
.--....: ,,·
,,.---r \..._. . ~-·" ( ... /?' ~ '------
By: C. M~· chae1: /Jones -President . / C. Michae . cornorated
aw
AGENDA ITEM #£(K) -DISTRICT 2 "J-1"
1<·~ .. __
I
I
I
i
I
I
• I
11 · •• :--...... •
I
_L~
--•••• ,.____.I
.....
"J-2"
,
f oro e:t?
C. Ii I GH A L-l ~
· -2c 5 .. 87 c:
. A tJE.XA ION
-~·
®
AGENDA ITEM #9(K) -DISTRICT 2
.-·
. . . ,
. I
' .
.··
..
·-
"J-2"
II K"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-45-3
AUTimRI ZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH
SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY RE
CONTRACT NO. 3-21-2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTI SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE
COUNTI, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS-
PORTATION COMPANY IN CONNECTION WITH
CONSTRUCTION OF THE WESTSIDE RELIEF INTER-
CEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 27 AND REACHES 28
AND 29, CONTRACT NO. 3-21-2
* * * * * * * * ·* * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain agreement dated March 10, 1976, wherein
Southern Pacific Transportation Company grants to County Sanitation District
No. 3 the right to construct the Westside Relief Interceptor, Portion of Reach
27 and Reaches 28 and 29, Contract No. 3-21-2, through Southern Pacific Trans-
portation Company right of way in the vicinity of Moody Street, northerly of
Katella Avenue, is hereby approved and accepted; .and,
Section 2. That use of said right of way is at no cost to the District;
and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District in
form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 10, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #9(L) -DISTRICT 3 II K"
II L"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-46
APPROVING AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. 11-lR-1
A RESOLlJfION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY-SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 3
AND 11 or ORANGE COUNTY' CALffORNIA,
APPROVING AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR MANHOLE
REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR, CONTRACT NO.
11-lR-1
* * * * * * * * * *
TI1e Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11 of
Orange County, California.,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the
Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief EngiI?eer, that award of contract
be made to Rewes-Schock for MANHOLE REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR, CONTRACT NO. 11-lR-1,
and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received
and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That award of contract to Rewes-Schock in the total amount of
$37,253.00, in accordance with the terms of their· bid ru1d the prices contained
therein, be approved; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of District No. 3, acting
for itself and as agent for District No. 11, are hereby authorized and directed
to enter into and siv1 a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to
the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor; and,
Section 4. Tirnt all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected,
and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 10, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #9CN) -DISTRICTS 3 & 11 II L II
"M"
B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N
SHEET
Engineer's Estimate: $45,000.
Date March 2, 1976 -11:00 A.M.
Contract For: MANHOLE REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR
NEWLAND-DELAWARE TRUNK
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
8.
9.
10.
CONTRACT NO. 11-lR-l
CONTRACTOR
Rewes-Schock
Santa Ana
George Miller Construction Company
Los Angeles
TOTAL BID
$37,253,00
AGENDA ITEM #9(N) -DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "M"
"N"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-47-7
AU'JHORI ZING ACCEPTANCE OF DI RECTOR'S DEED
RE CONTRACT NO. 7-1
A RESOLUTION OF 111E BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTIIORIZING ACCEPTANCE
OF DIRECTOR'S DEED FROM STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, RE CONTRACT
NO. 7-1
* * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of Cotmty Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange
County, California,
·DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Director's Deed dated December 23, 1975,
wherein the State of California, Department of Transportation, grants to County
Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent grant deed of certain excess properties
adjacent to the San Diego Freeway and abutting the District's easement for the
Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-l, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the real property conveyed by said Director's Deed is more
particularly described and shown on Exhibits 11 A11 and 11 B11 attached hereto and made
a part of this resolution; and,
· Section 3. That said Director's Deed is accepted at no cost to the
District; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and
directed to record said Director's Deed in the Official Records of Orange County,
California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 10, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #9(o) -DISTRICT 7 "NII
"O"
RESOLlITION NO. 76-48-7
AUTHORIZING EXECITTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH
SOU'IllERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY RE
CONTRACT NO. 7-6-7
A RESOLlITION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECfORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF AGREEMENT wrm SOlfTIIERN PACIFIC TRANSPOR-
TATION COMPANY IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION
OF TI-IE TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, REACH 11 AND
PORTION OF REACH 12, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-7
* * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of Collllty Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange
County, Califo111ia,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain agreement dated January 21, 1976, wherein the
Southe111 Pacific Transportation Company grants to County Sanitation District No. 7
the right to construct the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 11 and Portion of
Reach 12, Contract No. 7-6-7, through Southern Pacific Transportation Company
right of way in the vicinity of Irvine Boulevard and Newport Avenue, northerly to
Seventeenth Street, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That payments in the amounts of $40, 000. 00 for permanent right of
way, and $3,086.25 for temporary right of way, are hereby authorized; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District in
form approved by the General Cotmsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 10, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #9(p) -DISTRICT 7 "O"
"P-1"
February 27, 1976
Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 7
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject: Request for Annexation
Gentlemen:
I, the owner of the property located at 21252 Santiago Canyon
Road, do herePy request annexation to County Sanitation
District No. 7.
,-' -:QJ /l /(}
. h/. ·/_,r:;1rtlM -~Vji
Mrs. Donald Cray ·
21252 Santiago Canyon Road
Orange, California 92669
AGENDA ITEM #9(R) -DISTRICT 7 "P-1"
(
r·
. .
..__-------'\·--_ CITYOFO~G8,t?aJr-JD6t~Y -·--····---·· --·---·· ; .· J _. ~ o~t-k::>t::. S8.WE.¥'.Jf.JG AG~µc '( -----· --. -----· -· -· -;,
I l-. { .
f 1 ~ g
()
''-
"P-2"
.... ??
j)
"""'-~~ Ii •/ ~~ • • I // . . ... · ..... -··-/ ·---N -
I ,.i AGENDA ITEM #9 <R) -r sTRr CT 7 :t
1{LI
"P-2"
i. . .1 i .• .
t
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVEtWE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. N0. ___ 1 ______________ ~------
COrwRACTOR: CLIFFORD L. TH01-IPSON CONSTRUCTION cm.~PANY DATE March 4, 1976
------~---------~~----~~
JOB: Remodel Newland-Hamil ton Pumping Station Facilities, Contract No. 11-4R
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (lllrnM~I) $1,214.95
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
c~ntr~ct work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby appr~ved.
ADD:
Additional two rows of block to wall and excavation
and grading of entrance drive. Also extend roof
vent pipe . and increase gate post size to 4~".
TOfAL ADD.
Extension of Contract Time
.The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of
30 calendar days to accomplish the work in this change order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension this Change Order
Total TiEe Extension
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
Board authorization date:
November 27, 1975
60 Calendar Days
January 25, 1976
30 Calendar Days
30 Calendar Days
90 Calendar Days
February 24, 1976
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Change (ADD) ~~'t)
Amended Contract Price
App roved: .
$1,214.95
$1,214.95
$ 19' 821. 00
$ 0. 00
----------~----~·
$ 1,214.95
$ 21, 035. 95
March 10, 1976
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, Ca 1 i forn i a
By __ ,__ __________________ ~~--~------
Con s ult in g Engineer
By ___________________________ ~--------By---------------------.-~-=--~~~~ Chief Engineer
Contractor
"Q" AGENDA ITEM #9Cs) -DISTRICT 11 "Q"
"R-1"
IH\l\T IU1fli \HTEH IHSTHHT P.O. Box D-1 • 4201 Campus Dnvc •Irvine, Calif. 92664 • (714) 833-1223
Mr. Ray E. Lewis
Chief Engineer
March 4, 1976
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 90807
Subject: IRWD Connection to County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County Ocean Outfall System
Dear Mr. Lewis:
910LCC3/76
On November 17, 1975, a letter report was transmitted tq your Districts in
regard to the subject project. This report outlined the basic points in the
January 1972 _agreement between IRWD and CSDOC whereby IRWD purchased 15 MGD
capacity in the CSDOC ocean outfall system. That agreement provides for a
connection of a pipeline from IRWD to the ocean outfall surge tower at Plant
No. 2 in Huntington Beach.
IRWD has now commenced extensive studies to investigate alternate alignments
for the route of the pipeline from IRWD to the Sanitation Districts' outfall
system. As a result of the studies completed to date, it is now apparent
that connections to the CSDOC ocean outfall system at points other than the
ocean outfall surge tower may be desirable. If a change is made in the point
of connection to the CSDOC system, it will be necessary to revise the capital
and annual cost payments made by IRWD to CSDOC.
The costs for acquiring capacity in the CSDOC ocean outfall system were
originally determined from the results of a study conducted by John Carollo
Engineers dated May 24, 1971. That report estimated costs on a per unit flow
basis of various components of the CSDOC system.
Because of changed conditions since 1971, an updating of the May 24, 1971,
carollo study is needed to more accurately reflect present day conditions.
The cost of this study will be paid by IRWD under purchase orders already
issued by IRWD, and at no .cost to the Sanitation Districts. It would be
appreciated if you would authorize John Carollo Engineers to proceed with the
study as outlined.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
LCC:dft
cc: William F. Hurst
Alexander Bowie
S~cerely,
g-~j l~( -~:~;11-~---.. -
·· Lloyd c. Corf el t
Director -Engineering & Planning
Don J. Martinson, Lowry & Associates
AGENDA ITEM #11 -ALL DISTRICTS "R-1"
FORCE MAIN
ELLIS AVENUE
~SAN.~o \..JO DISTRICTJ 00
00 NO •. J
-4---
O.C.W. D. WATER
FACTORY 21
ADAMS AVENUE
42" JOS -15 m.g.d.~
6611 INTERPLANT-
56 m.g.d. --
8411 INTER PLANT -
90.m.g.d.
SANITATION
STRICT
. LANT NO. 2
0
. 00 °
Ooo
II R-2"
VICTORIA STREET
PUMP STATION
POINT OF CONNECTION
OUTFALL SURGE TOWER
OUTFALL -480 m.g.d.
78 11 OCEAN OUTFALL -240 m.g.d.
AGENDA ITEM #11 -ALL DISTRICTS
L•flf,.•11(1) '''
LOWRY AND ASSOCl~TfS
1)1 l•\l •A1.,lifltGTC .. &vi ....
'UU ~4 • C.AL•li:l_,..IA •1104
"R-2"
"S"
Director of Finance
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P. 0. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Gentlemen:
February 19, 1976
In checking our quotation on your specification #A-080 and your Purchase
Order #30177, we find that we have made an error in our bid.
In preparing our specification, the automatic transmission that you requested
was not priced out in our computation. As a result, we are unable to deliver
at the price quoted.
We request that our offer be withdrawn and your purchase order cancelled.
In recomputing our costs, we would find it necessary to increase our price
per unit by $213.00 per unit to make delivery. We are willing to do this
if we can receive an amendment to the purchase order. Although this increase
would result in a no-profit deal to us, we would be willing to deliver the
units because this deviation was due to our error.
This would result in an amended bid price as follows:
Unit Price
6 Units
Sales Tax
$4,118.08 each
TOTAL
$24,709.48
1,482.52
$26,192.00
If this is not possible, we would respectfully and regretfully request the
withdrawal of our bid and hope that we will continue to have the opportllllity
to quote on your transportation needs.
BC:brn
Sincerely,
~/;) : /.
'· •• ,. J ·. l" -~·-.... ·,..__ ~.._.vi.. .-k~ '--t.
Bob Creedon
Fleet Sales Manager
AGENDA IlEM #13(A) Cl)-ALL DISTRICTS
711EASl171H srnm. SANTA ANA. CALIF-Of<NIA 92701. (714) 543-9311
II s II
ORDINANCE NO. 509
AN ORDINANCE OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
NO. 5 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. SOS, AS AMENDED,
AND ORDINANCE NO. 508, PERTAINING TO CONNECTION
CHARGES
The Board of Directors of Cotmty Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange
County, California, does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1: Section (a) of Article 6 of Ordinance No. 505, as amended, is
hereby further amended to read as follows:
"(a) District Connection Charges. Before any connection permit
shall be issued, the applicant shall pay to the District, or its agent, the
charges specified herein.
(1) Connection Charge for New Construction, Family Dwelling
Buildings. For each new family dwelling building constructed,
the connection charge shall be $250 per dwelling unit.
(2) Connection Charge for New Construction, Other Than Family
Dwelling Buildings. For all other new construction, including
but not limited to commercial and industrial buildings, hotels
and motels and public buildings, the connection charge shall
be $130 per 1000 square feet of floor area contained within
such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge
for such new construction shall be $130.
(3) Connection Charge for Replacement Buildings. For new
construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge
shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in
Paragraphs (1) and (2) hereinabove. If such replacement
construction is commenced within two years after demolition
or destruction of the former building, a credit against such
charge shall be allowed, calculated on the basis of the
current connection charge applicable for the new construction
"T-1" AGENDA ITEM #20 -DISTRICT 5 "T-1"
"T-3"
Section 3. Section 402 of Ordinance No. 508 is hereby amended to read:
"402. DISTRICT NO. 5 CONNECTION CHARGES
1. District Connection Charges·
Before any connection permit shall be issued, the applicant
shall pay to the District, or its agent, the charges specified
herein.
(a) Connection charges for new construction, family
dwelling buildings.
For each new family dwelling building constructed,
the connection charge shall be $250 per dwelling unit.
(b) Connection charge _for new construction, other than
family dwelling buildings.
For all other new construction, including but not
limited to commercial and industrial buildings, hotels
and motels and public buildings, the connection charges shall
be $130 per 1000 square feet of floor area contained
within such construction, provided that the_minimum connection
charge for such new construction shall be $130.
(c) Connection charge for replacement buildings.
For new construction replacing former buildings, the
connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis
as provided in paragraphs (a) and (b) above. If such
replacement construction is commenced within two years
after demolition or destruction of the former building,
a credit against such charge shall be allowed, calculated
on the basis of the current connection charge applicable
for the new construction of the building dcmolis.1ed or
destroyed. In no case shall such credit exceed the
connection charge.
AGENDA ITEM #20 -DISTRICT 5 "T -3"
(d) Connection charges for additions to or alterations of
existing buildings.
In the case of structures where further new construction
or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of family
dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used
for other than family dwelling buildings, the connection
charge shall be $250 for each dwelling unit added or created
and in the case of new construction other than family
dwelling buildings, it shall be $130 per 1000 square feet
of additional floor area contained within such new
construction provided that new construction shall contain
additional fixture units.
(e) Payment of connection charges.
Payment of connection charges shall be required at the
time of issuance of the building permit for all construction
within the District, excepting in the case of a building
permit in the City of Newport Beach. The payment of the
sewer connection charge for such buildings will be required
at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing
connection permit for any construction within the
territorial limits of the District.
(f) Schedule of charges.
A schedule of cl1arges specified herein will be on file
in the office of the Secretary of the District and in the
Building Department of the City of Newport Beach."
Section 4. The Secretary of the Board is directed to certify to the adoption
of this ordinance-and cause it to be published in a newspaper of general circulation
within the County. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its adoption. ~
AGENDA ITEM #20 -DISTRICT 5
II U"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-51-6
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 73-52-6 RE DIRECTORS'
UNI FOl{M MILEAGE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
A RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO.
76-52-6 TO PROVIDE FOR DIRECTORS' UNIFORM
MILEAGE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County,
California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Section 4 of Resolution No. 73-52-6 is hereby amended to
read as follows:
"Section 4. That each Director shall receive the sum of Fifteen
Cents ($.15) per mile for each mile up to and including 150 miles,
Twelve Cents ($.12) per mile for each mile over 150 miles up to
and including 600 miles, and Six Cents ($.06) per mile for all
miles in excess of 600 miles, actually traveled on business of
the District per month. When traveling on the busines~ of more
than one District, such Director shall receive no more than said
mileage, whether on the business of one or several Districts''; and,
Section· 2. That this resolution shal 1 become· effective March 10, 1976.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 10, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #23 -DISTRICT 6 II u II
RES!J>LUTJION NO.. 76-33-1
FIXING COMPENSATl.DN FOR DIRECTORS
A RESOLUTION DF THE BOAllD OF Dir~CTORS OF. COUNTY S.ANIT1\'TTON
DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNIT, CALIFDRNIA., FIXING COMPEN-
SATION FOR ITS DIRECTORS AND RE.SCI ND ING RESOUJTIONS NOS .•
63-128 AND tf>B-3-1 REGkR.DJNG CDMPE'NSATlON
WHEREAS, Section 4733 .. 5 of the Hea11::h :and Sa£ety Corle prontles 1:.b:at \Where
two or more County Sanitation Districts h.ave joined in purchase:, nwnersbip:J use.,
-construction, or operation of a sewerage system :and said Districts noJ.d their
n:neeting.s jointly_, and one or more -of the Direct.ors serve :as .a Di:re:ctor on JD~
t:han one of suc.b Distri.cts meeting jointly, tbe Districts may_, by jnint TeS·D-
lution approved by each District_, limit: 'the cm1q:>ensatirm nf' sucb a Director £nr
at.t.ending said jointly-held meetings; and,,
WHEREAS,, Cormt:y Sanitation Districts Nos .. 1_, 2_, 3,, 5_, '6_, 7_, :and 11_, n:f
Orange Cmmty_, California_, have heretofore executed a ,,Joint D:wner.sbip_., Operation
and Construction Agreement, dated .July 1_, 1970_, as :amended; and_.,
WHEREAS_, said Districts hold their. regular monthly :meetings jointly:;
NOW_, :.THEREFORE_, the Board 0£ Directors ,0£ cColIDty Sanitation Di.strict No .. 1,
0£ Orange Cormty, Cali£onria,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That each Director shall receive tbe smn o:f $5U .. 100 :for attend-
ance at any meeting 0£ ~e Bo~d ?f Directors .0£ this District., provided that :he
shaH not receive IDore than tile sum of $ liOD .. DD per 1llIDJlth as sudt <e<LJnpensatinn
from t.his District; and_,
Section 2.. That not withstanding the provisions .0£ .Section 1., 'when a
Director of this District is also a Director of another District:, said Direct.or
shall be paid not more than a tot.al of $50 .. 00 £or any jointly-held meeting
attended by him when such .other District., or !Districts., has., or ·.have., 1dopted
a r-esolution substantially .similar to t:hi.s one., :as is permitted under the
provisions of Section 4733~5 of the Health .and Safety Cod.e.; .and.,
"V-1 1
' AGENDA ITEM #26 -JJlSTRI CT l '"V-1'"
"V-2"
Section 3. Section 2 of this resolution shall not apply to the Director
serving as Joint Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. The Director
serving as Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall receive the
sum of $50.00 from each District which he presides over in a jointly held meeting,
as authorized by Section 4733 of the Health and Safety Code; provided, however,
that the Joint Chairman shall not be paid more than $50.00 by any District for
any meeting; and,
Section 4. That each Director shall receive the sum of Fifteen Cents ($.15)
per.mile for each mile up to and including 150 miles, Twelve Cents ($.12) per
mile £or each mile over 150 miles Yp to and including 600 miles, and Six.Cents ($.06)
per mile for all miles in excess of 600 miles, actually traveled on business
of the District per month. When traveling on the business of more than one
District, such Director shall receive no more than said mileage, whether on the
business of one or several Districts; and,
Section 5. That each District meeting jointly shall bear an equal portion
of said compensation and mileage expense; and,
Section 6. That Resolutions Nos. 63-128 and 68-3-1 concerning compensation
of Directors, are hereby rescinded and made of no further effect; and,
Section 7. That this resolution shall become effective
~~~~~~~~~
and,
Section 8. That all actions of this District, whether by resolution, motion
or otherwise, inconsistent herewith or contrary to the terms hereof, be and they
are hereby amended to conform to the terms of this resolution.
. AGENDA ITEM #26 -DISTRICT 1 "V-2"
1·
"W-1"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-11-1
ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION AND REIMf3URSEMENT
FOR EXPENSES FOR DI HEC'l'ORS
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE COMPENSATION AND
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT POLICIES FOR ITS DIRECTORS,
AND REPEALING RESOLUTIONS NO. 63-128 AND 68-3-1.
WHEREAS, Section 4733 of the Health and Safety Code:provides
that the District Board has the power to fix the amount of compensa-
tion per meeting to be paid each member of the Board or for each day's
service rendered as a member by request of the Board; and
WHEREAS, Section 4733.5 of the Health and Safety Code provid~s
that where two or more County Sanitation Districts have joined in the
purchase, ownership, use, construction or operation.of a sewerage
system and said Districts hold their ~eetings jointly, and one or
more.of the Directors serve as a Director on more than one of such
Districts meeting jointly, the Districts may, by. resolution approved
by each District, limit the compensation of such a Director for
attending said jointly held meetings; and
WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7
and 11 of Orange County, Caiifornia, have heretofore executed a
Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, dated July 1,
.1970, as amended; and
WHEREAS, Section 4734 of the Health and Sa~ety. Code provides
that where two or more County Sanitation Districts. have joined in
the administration anq operation of the respective Districts and
hold their meetings jointly and such meetings are presided over by
a Director of one.of the Districts acting as Joint Chairman for and
on behalf of the joint organization, each District so participating
may pay the Joint Chairman the same compensation as a Director of
such District is paid; and
AGENDA ITEM #26 -DISTRICT 1 "'tl-1"
·~
11 W-2"
WHEREAS, said Districts hold their regular monthly meetings
jointly.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 1 of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section·!. That each Director shall receive tr.e sum of Fifty
Dollars ($50.00) for attendance at each meeting of the Board of
Directors or for each day's service rendered as a member of the
Board by request of the Board, provided that he shall not receive
more· than the sum of Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) per month as such
compensation from this District. Each day's service rendered as a
member of the District Board shall be deemed to intlud2, but not be
limited to, attendance: (a) as a member of the Executive Committee
of the Joint Administrative Organization; (b) as a member of any
committee appointed by the Chairman of the Joint Adm~nistrative
Organization or the Chairman of the District which has established
the committee; (c) when expressly invited to attend the Executive
Committee meetings by the Chairman of the Joint Administrative
Organization; (d) conferences with State and/or Federal le~islators
regarding Joint Administrative Organization business when approved
by action of the Joint Boards; _or (e) attendance at conferences for
business of the Joint Administrative Organization or the District
when approved by action of the Joint Boards or the District Board.
Section 2. If a Director represents two or more Districts,
the payment to the Director for attendance at meetings or for each
day's service shall be"shared equally with each District repre-
sented by the Director.
Section 3. Notwithstanding the provisions of Se~tion 1,
when n Director of this District is also a Director of nnothcr
District, said Director shall be paid not more than a total of
Fifty Dollars {$50.00) per day for attendance at any jojntly
held meeting of said Districts or each day's services rEndered
AGENDA ITEM #26 -DISTRICT 1 "\4-2"
"W-3"
concurrently to said Districts by the Director when such other
District, or Districts, has, or have, adopted a resolution
substantially similar to this one, as is permitted under the
provisions of Section 4733.S of the. Health and Safety Code.
Section·4. Section 3 of this resolution shall not apply to
the Director serving as Joint ~hairman of the Joint Administrative
Organization. The Director serving as Chairman of the Joint Admin-
istrative Organization shall receive the sum of Fifty Doll~rs
($50.00} from each District which he presides over in a jointly
held meeting of the Joint Administrative Organization, as author-
ized by Se~tion 4734 of the Health and Safety Code; provided,
however, that the Joint Chairman shall not be paid more than
Fifty Dollars ($50.00) by any District for any meeting.
Section 5. The Director serving as Chairman pr Vice Chairman
of the Joint Administrative Organizat~on shall receive the sum of
Fifty Dollars ($50.00) from the District which he represents and no
other District when attending a meeting of his District or other
Districts or Executive Committee or other Committee as3ignments
approved by. the Joint Boards, or when attending to special ·service
rendered as a Director by request of ·the Joint Boards.
Section 6. Each Director shall receive the sum of Fifteen
Cents ($.15) per mile for each mile up to and including 150 miles,
Twelve Cents ($.12) per mile for each mile over 150 miles up to and
including 600 miles, and Six Cents ($.06) per mile for all miles in
excess of 600 miles, actually traveled on business of the. District
per month. When traveling on the business of more than one District,
such Director shall receive no more than said mileage, whether on
the business of one or several Districts.
Section 7. When traveling on the business of one or more
Districts, the Director shall be entitled to reimbursement of
expenses necessarily incurred in the course of said tr~vel in
accordnnce with the following schedule:
AGENDA ITEM #26 -DISTRICT 1 "\'/-3"
"W-4"
Commercial Transportation -per actual invoice
Hotel -room rate per actual statement for occupancy
Registration -actual cost of conference or meeting
registration fee
Ground Transportation -as itemized
Telephone Service -as itemized
Meals, Gratuities and Incidentals -$20.00 per day. In those
cases where the actual cost of the Director's personal meals
and incidentals required during the course of the conference
or meeting exceeds the per diem, reimbursement will be based
upon actual expenditures.
Section 8. No Director shall receive pay for attendance at
any meeting, such as Executive Committee or other committees, which
is scheduled immediately preceding, immediately succeeding, or con-
current with a regularly scheduled District or joint meeting of the
District.
Section 9. Resolutions Nos. 63-128 and 68-3-1 concerning
compensation for Directors are hereby repealed and made of no further
force or effect.
Section 10. This resolution shall become effective
I 1976.
~~~~~~~~~~~~-
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular.meeting held
1976.
AGENDA ITEM #26 -DISTRICT 1
"X"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-39-7
AMENDING ANNEXATION POLICY
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLlITION NO.
75-44-7, ESTABLISHING FEES AND PROCEDURES
CONCERNING ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE
DISTRICT, RE COMPUTATION OF ANNEXATION
ACREAGE FEE
* * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to establish certain requirements for
territory seeking annexation to this District; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of this District have heretofore adopted such
requirements; and,
WHEREAS, this Board of Directors has reviewed the heretofore established
policy and finds that it would be appropriate to modify the provision for compu-
tation of annexation acreage fee to eliminate inclusion of local collection systems
because they have no bearing on the cost of the Districts' Master Plan system and
treatment works equity;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Section 1, Sub-Section (b) of Resolution No. 75-44-7 is
hereby amended to read as follows:
"(b) Beginning July 1, 1975, and annually thereafter, the sum to be paid
per acre for the ensuing twelve months will be the net worth per acre of
the District, reduced by the book value of local collection facilities,
on the preceding June 30. Date of approval by the Board of Directors of
the annexation shall govern the amount of the fee per acre hereinabove
established."
Section 2. That this resolution shall be effective as of July 1, 1975.
PASSED AND ADOf'TED at a regular meeting held March 10, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #29 -DISTRICT 7 "X"
"Y II
LAW Of"FICE:S
RICHARD O. ,.RAZ CC
S'YCPUCN C. STC.W~RT
THOMAS l. WOODRurr
.Jc,.rru:v A. ttARTM~N
S ( c wcl rt, ,,r o ocl r!JJf & Fr<l zc<<.J
1055 NORTH f.1AIN ~RE:CT, SUITE IOZO
ARCA coot: 71'4
83~ • 621Z
SA~~L .. ORNIA 92701
January 21, 1976
----
-----·-~ -----kr. Fred A. Harper
General Manager
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
P. O. Box 8127
·.
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Re: Orange Park Acres Annexation to
County Sanitation District No. 7
Dear Mr. Harper:
I have been advised that the Directors of th~ Orange Park
Acres Homeowners Association have recently submitted to your
office a revised annexation and improvement plan for their
properties. Specifically, the request now appears to seek
to annex to County Sanitation District No. 7 and not install
any portion of the main/trunk sewer system at ·this time.
It is my opinion that there is no legal basis under the County
Sanitation District Act, the Improvement District Acts or-the
District·Reorganization Act to establish an improvement dis-
trict solely to pay for the annexation fees that would be
paid tO-D1strict No. 7.
The provision~ of Health and Safety Code Section 4806 clearly
intend that. improvements must be -installed when issuing bonds
and annexation fees alone would not qualify.
District No. 7 could require the payment or security for the
future payment of annexation fees to be posted with the
District prior to final action upon the annexation.
TLW:ab
l-A-2
truly yours,
T:::: ef;1.~~
General Counsel
AGENDA ITEM #30(A) -DISTRICT 7 "Y"
tnNr:!JT A. WILSON
l<l:NNCTH I. JONC5
JAMC!I T. MORTON
ANORCW C. HALL, JR.
OCRALO A LA!IY[R
J[RP:MIAM .J. LYNC>I
MICHA.ti.. R NAVt
JAMI:!! L.COPCLANO
!!MARON ti WHITC
'VILso:r~.-. JoNEs, Mo1noN & LYNCH CHAR LI:& N. l<IRKllRIOI:
18U'4•1911
JOMN C. LYNCH (1Q!l8•1971)
.. HILIP 0 AS!IA,.
ATTORNE'JS •.NO COUNSELLORS AT LAW
630 NORTh <;AN MATEO DRIVE
"'""'•A1or .. OONOON
(.JOSCPH 11.ooroooN)
Pl:OOV L. MetLLIOOTT
RODCRT J. Hll..L
P, 0. BOX 1::;~ KIAKBRIOC .. WILSON
ID,0-ID47 """'111
THOMA!! C. MORONCY
T>IOMA5 D ADAMS
SHCRROO 5. OA.Vl!I
LA.WrlCNCC C. JCN5CN
MA'rCR A. OAMICL
JOAN C. 15RIOOY
PAUL C. Wll.."IN5
THOMAS 5. OWCN
R015CRT 0. A.UWDRtY
ROY .J. "ocor:N
SAN MATEO, CALI FORNI" ()4401
[415) 342-3523
flillRKBAIOE",WILSON, HAAZ~CLO .. WALLACE
IU4l•l8CU
January 28, 1976
0,. COUNll£L
~RTHU" J, •tA.MZP CLO
A. A. KAPLAN (MO QNl yl
Honorable Board of Directors
Sanitation District No. 7 of
Orange County
P. 0. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Re: Proposal for Concurrent Annexation and Bond
Authorization -Orange Park Acres
Gentlemen:
On behalf of the residents and property owners of the Orange Park
Acres area and the Orange Park Association, Inc., the following is the
general proposal now being made in connection with the annexation.
Following extensive investigation and discuss~on, the concept
which is proposed to be followed is generally as follows:
1. Concurrently with the annexation procedures, following original
proposal, it would be submitted to the voters as a condition of annexa-
tion the approval of general obligation bonds covering the following:
"Z-1"
a) The sum of money necessary to acquire appropriate
rights of service and use in the existing treatment and
outfall facilities equal to the appropriate annexation
charge.
b) The payment of a sum necessary to provide major
trunks necessary to serve the area within the boundaries,
the costs to be adjusted to reflect an off set of any
territory within the boundaries of District No. 7 which
abuts and would be served by any part of that system,
i.e., property north of Chapman Avenue and immediately
east of proposed Reach 18 of District No. 7 master plan.
c) The reimbursem~nt of advan~es made by certain
property owners within the area of costs of annexation,
as well as the payment of any costs incurred subsequent
to approval by LAFCO.
AGENDA ITEM #30(B) -DISTRICT 7 "Z-1"
Honorable Board of Directors
Sanitation .District No. 7 of
Orange County
January 28, 1976
Page Two
2.· In exchange for this area incurring an obligation to provide
facilities normally payable from connection charges pursuant to the
District's policy of providing trunk sewers within one-quarter mile
of all properties, each separate parcel within the boundaries of the
annexed area as of the date of election would be extended the equivalent
of one connection charge credit at such time as the property is hooked
to the sewer. In this regard, it is proposed that collector sewers be
built either by cash financing, where possible, or by individual assess-
rment proceedings. Additionally, it is expected that divisions of land
after the date of election would result in the obligation to pay con-
nection charges for all except the first connection.
3. As in the case of a private subdivision development, and as
a condition of the general obligation bond proceedings, the District
will provide for the contribution from time to time from connection
charges of a reimbursement of an appropriate dollar figure relating to
that portion of the trunk system funded through the bond issue. It is
here understood that there are currently outstanding previously executed
reimbursement agreements amounting to approximately $150,000. For that
purpose, an attempt will be made to adjust the reimbursement obligation
in order to assure that the earlier contractors will not be unduly
affected by this proposal. The proceeds of the reimbursements to the
present area would be utilized for the purpose of retiring bonds in
advance of maturity or, if more appropriate from a cost saving standpoint,
for the payment of both principal and interest when due.
It.is presently understood that the £oregoing proposal would
result in a maximum initial debt obligation for this annexation of some
$1,141,000. The precis~ dollar figures must be refined by the assistance
or the District staff and would be available at least in preliminary form
at the time of presentation of the proposal to LAFCO. The final form
would be before your Honorable Board prior to the actual formal hearing
on the annexation. It is proposed that the matter should be expedited
so that it may be placed on the ballot no later than November of this
year, with the understanding that property would be placed on the tax
roll for the 1977-78 fiscal year. Any delay beyond November would
result in a postponement into a later fiscal year.
We hope that the foregoing proposal will result in a clearly
equitable treatment of the property owners .and users, both within the
"Z-2" AGENDA ITEM #30(B) -DISTRICT 7 "Z-2"
. . ... .
Honorable Board of Directors
Sanitation District No. 7 of
Orange County
•
January 28, 1976
Page Three
present boundaries of Sanitation District No. 7 and within the proposed
annexed area. It is our intent to assure that all persons. are equally
treated and that no unfair advantage or "free rides" are received and
further to assure that the cost of sewers will not be so burdensome as
to prove impossible of accomplishment.
for
PLMcE:s
cc: Thomas L. Woodruff, Esq.
Mr. George C. Rach
Orange Park Association, Inc.
"Z-3" AGENDA ITEM #30(B) -DISTRICT 7 "Z-3"
II AA"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-52-7
AMENDING RESOLlJfION NO. 73-53-7 RE DIRECTORS'
UNIFORM MILEAGE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
A RESOLlITION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO.
73-53-7 TO PROVIDE FOR DIRECTORS' UNIFORM
MILEAGE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County,
California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Section 4 of Resolution No. 73-53-7 is hereby amended to
read as follows:
"Section 4. Tirnt each Director shall receive the sum of Fifteen
Cents ($.15) per mile for each mile up to and including 150 miles,
Twelve Cents ($.12) per mile for each mile over 150 miles up to
and including 600 miles, and Six Cents ($.06) per mile for all
miles in excess of 600 miles, actually traveled on business of
the District_per month. When traveling on the business of more
than one District, such Director shall receive no more than said
mileage, whether on the business of one or several Districts"; and,
Section 2. That this resolution shall become effective March 10, 1976.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 10, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #3J. -DISTRICT 7 II AA"
-,. CONSTRUCTION
PROGRESS REPORTS
FEBRUARY 2 9 1 19 76
ENGINEERING DEPART1'1 E NT
OE'<:ic: PtPIN<r
1..,, ~TA l-L.AT10 ,.._,
C(!)t-JTl f•.HA.~S
10
I
q B r ' 5 4 J 2 I
I r--f<ETUR..tv ·s t-~1..;.
pu f';\f ::ffATIOl-J -Pl
A 11.EA c.,L.JCNJ€.D up I tJ
p~-FA~ATio N ~DK.
p1P/IVGr o.J ST~J-L-~H10 /\J
DIGE.'$TE~f
'
.-,
( ) "__..
EXISTJN6 ~ltOJ.JDARY r-.. aARIF/£/U
. \
l'-_;
AERATION BA51N~
PJIJG.
2
4
8 £1/\JG I N~TAu.£0
(}(}() ~E'!'lC ii:lQl'J~ 1M.Pr'!.0Pb:IZ.LY
~ F;24~1CAT!;O fi\f.t':::kAN 151'1'5 I
3
6 . s
8 7
10 9
IZ II
14 /3
fEtONDARY (LARIFIEKS
S U.ll C.E' GATE Afl.ID OP~JZ.Ai/J£ I N srALJ..AT IO N
C OtUT l)JUE S
WAS TE ~L U06E
THlc.J<ENE ~S
/
D POWE K BU/L/)J)IG
50 MG D ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT
CONTRACT NO. P1 -16
C.0.NT.RACT .NO._ P1.-t6 -------·----
50 MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT
Donovan Construction Company of Minnesota, Contractor
STARTING DATE: June 27, 1974
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $29,876,ooo.oo
PAID TO DATE: $24,116, ,.(88. 35
Contract is for the construction of Activated
Sludge secondary treatment facilities at Plant No.
l. The new facilities UJi],], aid the Districts in
meeting rrandated State and Federal ocean discharge
re.quiremen ts.
h'hen completed, the secondary treatment system
11Ji],], process the 50 mgd of wastetJater flowing
through Plant No. 1. The. effluent wiU then b·lend
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 14, 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 30 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 13, 1977
1.Jith Plant No. 2 effluent at the outfaZl booster
station, improving the overall quality of water
pwnped through the outfall system into the ocean.
Significant structuxies included in the contra.ct
are the Blower Building, Aeration Basins, Second-
ary C"larifiers, wo Digeste1~s, Waste Sludge Thick-
eners and the Power Bui Zdin.g.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
As· the quantity of work diminishes and the general working pace of
the job slows, Donovan has been releasing employees. They have also
had to contend with supplier problems such as inadequate shop
drawings and improperly fabricated equipment.
In the Blower Building there have been some pours in the balcony and
ceiling areas. The pump station engines were set in place and the
exterior walls are being sandblasted.
Aeration Basin deck piping continues with weirs being installed in
the effluent area. Sluice r;ates are being installed on the Secondary
Calrifiers.
The contractor is reworking the mechanisms furnj_shed for the Waste
Sludge Thickeners. Discussion have been attended regarding pumps which
were not assembled per specification.
No work accomplished in the Power Building this month. The.Digesters
have been cleaned up for the antici~ated piping installation.
------0-----
JPL ACTS PROCESS PLANT JOB N2. PW-045
(
CONTRACT PW~045
JPL-ACTS PROCESS PLANT
J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation & Henck Pro,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
STARTING DATE: Oct. 1, 1975
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: x
PAID TO DATE: x
'·
Contra.ct is for construction of a one million gal-
lon per cl.c:y pilot wastewater> treatment plant at
Waste:Jater Treatment Plant No. 2. The plant ivi.Zl.
use a unique Activated Carbon Treatment System
(ACl'S) deve'loped by the National Aeronautics and
Spa.ce.Agency's Jet Propulsion Labora.tory. This
tl"eatment method was perfected in its experimental
sta.ges with a mobile research unit open:i.ted by JPL
personnel at the Districts' Wastewater Treatment
Plant No. l in Fozmtain ValZey during 1974-75.
The system uses sludge raemoved from the wastewate:ra
to produce activated ca:rbon thI'.ough a pyrolysis
reactor. The activated caztbon is then reintro-
duced into the wastewater stream in a secondary
sta.ge for additional. removal of pollutants. OnZ.y
. . -pa:ratially used after the second s~ge, the aotiva-
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 28, 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar D~.ys
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 28, 1976
ted carbon and secondary sludge slurry is fed into
the inco"ming waste:Jate:ra stream to increase system
efficiency.
The mobile e:r:perimental unit used to refine this
system from laboratory bench experiments was batch
operated with mechanical. handling of rra.teriaZ from
sta.ge to stage. The pilot plant li){,Z.Z. be a contin-
uously run, automated system.
As.a pri.me objective of the Acrs, it could solve
an increasing problem of sludge disposal as this
rrateri.aZ. becomes more plentiful. with improved
wastetJater treatment and increased flows. In ad-
dition, the effluent f:r>0m this treatment system is
e::r:pected to meet the discha.Pge :raequirements of
the Districts' N •. P.D.E.S. permit •
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Paving and landscaping on the water side of the plant
completed. All equipment with the· exception of the
flash dryer, calciner and afterburner are operational.
A complete plant start up is anticipated for the week
of March 29th. Current evaluation of noise and dust
control underway. Instrumentation, trouble shooting
and systems int~gration work will continue through the
month.
)CThis contmct is a design and con.tJtruct contract whereby the contractor
U1 paid $50,000.00 plua the actual co~ta for all labor and mate1-iala.
TRINIOAO ==ST=·~
LAKE VIEW
. ~,..~ \\"'\\.'< F £ E
~~~
Q\S1 -2
-· ~ . . .. . . . . . . . .. I . . .
.· .· . .
"!' ...
\ : ,,..,. ..
I '-\.. •• . '·. .
:: ~ ·.= :· ...... .: .: er .. .. .. ·-• 4 .. .. . .
coNlRACl No.2-14-3
GROVE: ~T. ---
CONTRACT 2 -14-3
SANTA ANA RIVER ItlTEf~CEPTOR SEWER ~ SOUTH SANTA ANA
RJ VER lfHERCEPTOR CONNECTORJ REACHES Z, 3 & 4
John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contractor
ST AR Tl NG DATE : 0 ct . 15 , 19 7 5
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $3,814,462.00
PAID TO DATE: $33,664.oo
Contract calls for the construction of a 3.125
~~le rcinf orced concrete pipe trunk Zine eewer a-
long La Palma Ava. from Grove St. to Imperial. Hwy.
in hzaheim.
Phe first one-third of the project uses 51" diam-
eter pipe, the bal.ance is 48".
Also included in the contract ie a lateral con-
ncctozt Une to the Santa Ana River• Intei'ceptor
system from 300' north of Santa Ana CaJZyon Rdo a-
long Imperial Hwy. to La. Palma Ave. This 2?50'
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Nov. 12, 1977
TI ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Nov. 12, 1977
section of 33" diameter vitr1:fied clay pipe is
designed to receive flows. from the South R{ve2,
Trunk, se2,ving Santa Ana Canyon. With the c:ov;p Z.C-
tion of the South Rlvcr Trunk, the Santa Ana Can-
yon pwrrr.n:ng station can. be abandoned.
This section of the interceptor system is designed
to 1zandle up to 35 miUion gallons flow per dayo
Included in this figure is 30 NGD aUovxmce for
accepting future high brine waste1;Jater flou.ls from
San Bex?uzr4ino ~.d Riverside Coimties o
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Contractor installed 112 feet of pipe during February. The
heading remains in the vicinity of Grove St. and La Palma Ave.
Trenching has been backfilled across the eastbound traffic
lanes and opened up the traffic. If the present method of
operation is continued, ·it may not be necessary-to close Palm
Ave. to traffic as previously proposed. One lane of controlled
traffic in each direction continues in the vicinity of the pipe
head.
The jacking pit for tunneling under the railroad was started
during February and encountered.problems when it was found
that a gas line casing was lower than shown on.the plans and
interferred with the contractor's casing used in the tunneling
operation. The contractor will now begin a new jacking pit
from the east to meet the tunnel where the gas line interferred
with it. The sewer line itself will fit under the gas line
casing that exists in the ground.
DJS.T. 2
• z COMPLETE
---... TO BE CONSTRUCTED
CONTRACT No. 2 -14 -4
PROPosEo
PARK S1T£
..
PRIVATE RO.
""" ..
CONTRACT 2 -14-4
SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH S
Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc., Contractor
STARTING DATE: Oct. 15,, 1975
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $4, 240, 957. 00
PAID TO DATE: $1, 069, 965. 50
Contiact io for construction of a 5.1 mile long
Bection of rdnf orced concrete pipe trunk line
eel.Jex> from Inipc1•ial, llwy. along La Palma Aveo in
AnaJwim, t!"aVer>ving the nCl.J Yorba RegioriaZ Pa!"k to
Weir Canyon Rd. The right-of-z,Jay then crosacs the
Santa li>?a Rive!" at two places as it traverses
county territory through Santa Ana Val Zey lrriga-
tion Co. and Bi'yant Ranch p2-iopertias to Gypswn Rd.
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 7' 1977
Tl ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 7' 19 7 7
Vepending on design criteria, vaPious sections of
this line uc.e 42, 45 and 51 inch dfometer pipe.
This cection will, handle . flows up to 32 mill.ion
gallons per dayo Ir.eluded. in this figure is 30
NGD allowance for accepting fut-urc high brine
wastei.Jater flows from San Ber>nardino and Riveroide
Counties.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Contractor installed 5,616 feet of pipe 'during February.
Pipe heading is now at Mosswood Drive and about 80%
through the Yorba Linda Regionq,l Park section·.
The trench is backfilled and compacted to within a few
hundred feet of the pipe heading· and all street areas
have been paved to ease traffic flow.
DIST. 2
----
CONTRACT No.
2-14-5
COAL CANYON RD.
GYPSUM
CANYON RD.
SANTA ANA
CANYON RD.
CONTRACT 2-14-5
SANTA ANA RIVEH INTERCEPTOH SEWER
REACHES 6, 7 & 8
S. S. Zarubica,· Contractor
ST.ART! NG D/\ TE:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT:
. PAID TO D/\TE:
Nov. 27, 1975
$2,096,676.15
$37,437.35
'contract is for the construction of ·a 2. 4 mile
long section of reinforced concrete pipe lino BezJ-
cr. The Uno goes through the Santa Ana Canyon
from where Contract llo. 2-11-4 ends in ahout tlzc
center of the Bryant Ranch property, along the
route of the Santa Ana River and through the
northern po1~tion of the Gl'oen River Golf Course to
the County Line. The line terrr.inates in a cor.trol
and meterir.g struci'ure designed to measzn.1 e [ZouJs
from the upper basin counties.
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 21, ·1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Dnys
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 21, 1976
The line conait;tB of 15, 42, and 39-inch diamcte1•
sections of pipe. The d-i-G!Tieterc c7:.a>~ge in 21 cla-
tion to decign. reqU1~rcrr:en ts.' Thie ccction of the
Santa Ana River Intcrcept'o'I' cy.s tcm will han.cile
flews of approxir:-ateZy 32 million gallons pel' £?ay.
Included in this figv11e is 30 /.,'GD aUowance f'o1 1
accepting futu:r>e high brine 1h'asteLJater floL]:; frcm
San Be1'7lardino and R-tvcrside Counties.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
. •
Contractor has dug the necessary pits for construction
of the metering structure at the west end of .the job,
and· is starting pipe excavation.
Fencing .of the pipeline right-of-way has been completed
through the golf course .
DI ST. 2
CONTRACT No. 2-15
lU
" ~
CAL STATE ~ULLERTON q;:
CAMPUS ~
CONTRACT No. 2-15
YORBA LINDA PUMP STATION
J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation & Hcnck Pro,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
STARTING DATE: Sept. 26, 1974
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $671, 146.-oo
PAID TO DATE: $620,531.57
Contract is "for the construction of a reinforced
conCPete structure to house wet wells and pwnps
for tmnsferring tributary uxistewater through a
force m:iin line into the Santa Ana River, Carbon
Ca/llJOn Inte1"ceptor-reZief Trunk Line system for
conveyance to rla.otewater Redamation Plant No. 1
in Fountain VaZZ.ey. This will assist in relieving
the p1"esentZy congested Newhope-Placentia .Trunk
Line and will serve proposed Zand use development
of the tributary area to the year 2010.
The pwnp station structta>e is located at the in-
tersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associa:ted
Road in .Fullerton. It is being constructed on
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 22, 1975
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 81 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 10, 19'""(6
what was originally Vniversit;y of California, Ful-
lerton property at the nortlw1-in perimeter of the
campus. Special arrangements were m:ide with the
University for use of the property.
The above-growui portion of the structure will be
a low profile slab 85~ x 109', 2 feet above
ground. The deepest portion of the structure will
be 35 feet wuier the ground. The District has
agreed to construct a slwnp-stone fence around the
structu.re and landscape the area in accordance
L>ith future compatible use by the University. The
Univeroity plans to construct an arboretum in the
immediate area at some futta'e date.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Brick wall surrounding the pump station on three sides
has been completed. Landscaping is now complete on all
sides, with trees in place both on the site and along
Yorba Linda Blvd. Sprinklers are in in the landscaped
area. The.surface area inside the brick wall around
the pump station has been painted with black top.
Inside structural painting continues and is approximately
70% complete .. Pump discharge manifolding is completed,
with three pumps in place. Pump engines expected for
delivery last month have not shown up.
All essential wiring to the structure has been completed
and the power transformer energized. Control wiring will
be completed when the pump. motors are delivered and
installed.
J l..___-=-------L INC O_=-.;._L N _I l......__~AVE~. ___,, L
I
I
I Cl TY OF D«L I -ANAl-IEIM MOii~
~· al.lit/DA
~
~
tJRANGE ..
! AVE_
N
PARK
CERRITOS AVE.
CITY
OF" s. p, A*.
DIST. 3 CYPRESS
SYRACUSE
____ _u.~~~T~E~LL~A:..:.....-----Jlt-----___;A~~~E~.---___J
II --COMPLETE
, ... --TO BE CONSTRUCTED
CONTRACT No. 3-20-2
CONTRACT No. 3-20-2
KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 7
A. G~ Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Co.,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
STARTING DATE: March 6, 1975
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $3,876,870.00
PAID TO DATE: $3, 393, 076. 00
Contract is for instaZZation of a Reinforced Con-
crete Pipe (R. C.P.) sewer line from a point 1200
feet south of KateZZa Avenue on Knott Avenue in
Stanton, north on Knott Avenue to Lincoln Avenue
in Anaheim, a distance of 2. 3 mites. Pipe diame-
ters are 72" for the first 3, 900 feet, 63" for
6, 900 feet and 66" for the remaining 1200 feet of
the project. Flows from this reach wiU drain in-
to Contract 3-20-1 to the .south.
This project is a portion of the Knott Inte1~ceptor
relief system designed to relieve the presently
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: March 6, 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days.
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: March 6' 1976
congested MiZZer-l!older Trunk Sewer by inte11cep-
ting flows from the northwest portion of District
3. The southerly ternnnus of the system is at the
intersection of Brookhurst Street and Ellis Avenue
in Fountain Valley. It wiZZ eventuaZZy extend to
Imperial Avenue in La Habra.
This portion of the relief system is designed to
handle a flow of 68 million gallons per day and
LJiZZ serve the proposed developed land use plan in
the tributary area to the year 2010.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Contractor installed 870 feet of pipe during February.
First course paving has been laid to Orange Avenue.
Trench is backfilled to the vicinity of Del Monte St.
The jacking pit area approaching the railroad at Ball
Road has been paved, with a small portion left open for
later installation of a 12" connector line sewer and
vent.
Two lane traffic control from Katella south to Orange
Avenue with flagman control down to one lane in the
vicinity of the pipe heading continues.
Final paving on Knott Ave. through the City of Stanton
will be installed during the week of March Sth.
DI ST. 3
--COMPLETE
-llU -TO BE CONSTRUCTED
CONTRACT
No. 3 -21 -1
tJRANGEWOOO ~ AVE.
"" \)
" '' ~
~
't
Ro~~Moo;? r. WY.
J ~I· ~~
BRADBURY KO.
~ATELlA AVE'.
FARGUJ.IA~ AVE. -
Al
( ...
CONTRACT No. 3-21-1
WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR,
REACHES 25, 26 & PORTION OF 27
A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Company,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
~ ST AR TI NG DATE :
ORIGINAL CONTRACT:
PAID TO DATE:
June 26, 1975
$1, 416, 41~8. 00
$1,417,834.14
Contrac~ is for the in~talZation of a Vitrified
Clay Pipe (V. C. P.) sewer from the vicinity of the
District's Westside Lift Station, .1800 feet west
of Seal Beach Boulevard and Lampson Avenue along
the flood control channel, along the channel to
Seal Beach Boulevard where it turns north along
Los Alamitos Boulevard (the northern extension of
Seal Beach Boulevard) to Katella Avenue. It then
turns east on KateUa to Lexington Drive, where it
tenninates. Pipe diameter is 39" for the fi!:'st
5, 500 feet, 36" for the next 5, 700 feet and 30"
for the final 5, 200 feet. Total length is approx-
i~ately 3.1 miles.
This project is a continuation of the Westside
Relief Interceptor sewer which begins at the Seal
Beach Boulevard Pumping Station at the intersec-
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 22, 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days ·
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 22, 1976
tion of Seal-Beach Boulevard and Westminster Ave-
nue in the City of Seal Beach. The system will
eventuaZ:Z.y run generally in a northerly direction
through the western portion of District 3 and will
terminate at Cresent Avenue and Moody Street in
the City of La PaUna..
Upon completion, the system will 1'elieve the Los
Alamitos Subtrunk Sewer which, at present, func-
tions as the main interceptor sewer for the west~
side basin and, for the most part, is currently
flowing at or necw peak capacity.
This portion of the relief interceptor is designed
to handle floos of up to 14. 'l million gallons per
day and will serve the proposed developed Zand use
plan in the tributary area to the year 2010.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Job completed. Minor repairs and completion of contract
obligations and permit requirements.
. .
SUMMARY
THEATMENT PLANT WORK
Total Value Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Total Work During February
Total Work Awaiting Award
DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK
Total Value Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Total Work During February
Total Work Awaiting Award
TOT AL AMOUNT UNDER CONT.RACT AND
AWAITING AWARD
$30,139,478
2LJ,116~788
795,809
42,046
$17,318,210
6,589,103
1,251,449
37,253
$30,139,478
$17,318,210
37,253
$47,536,987
..
AGENDA ITEM NO. 12
March 1, 1976
Joint Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11
of Orange County, California
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
Subject: Summary Financial Report for Six Months Ended December 31, 1975
Transmitted herewith is the regular quarterly summary financial report for the six months ended December 31,
1975, pursuant to the Boards' policy directive of June 14, 1972.
The statements summarize the fiscal activities of the joint operations and the individual Districts for the first
half of the 1975-76 fiscal year and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The combined 1975-
7~ budgets for all Districts is $98.9 mill ion, of which approximately 82% is for capital expenditures for facil I-
.ties improvements and additions. The average percents of budgeted revenue and expense categories of the several
Districts are as follows:
Budgeted Revenue
Average
Percent of
Total Budget
Tax Revenue 19%
Federal & State Construction Grants 22
Connection Fees 2
Other Revenues 6
Carry-over from Accumulated
Construction Reserves -2...!_
100%
19%
15
2
11
Budgeted Expenditures
District Facilities Expansion
and Reserves
Joint Works Expansion and
Reserves
Debt Service
Share of Joint Operations
District Operations, Maintenance,
and Other
Average
Percent of
Total Budget
1974-75 1975-76
44%
41
4
5
6
100%
45%
37
4
5
_9_
100%
Included in each District's statement is a summary of the above major income and expense categories and an
itemization of their trunk sewer construction projects, and respective share of the joint works expansion.
Separ~te staff reports relative to the current status on individual constructiori projects are included each
month with the agenda material for the Joint Board meeting.
Except for inventory control, the EDP system has been fully implemented. The inventory system is being phased
in conjunction with the move to our new warehouse and establishment of revised warehousing and purchasing
procedures which we expect to complete in the near future. The staff is undertaking a review of the on-1 ine
computer system to assure maximum utilization of its capabilities, consistent with cost effectiveness.
Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. The statements are presented on an accrual
basis and, therefore, inter-district transactions for fiscal '75-76 which were accrued in 1974-75 are not
reflected in the yeur-to-date balances. If you have any questions concerning the material, I would be pleased
to discuss them with you at your convenience.
CASH INVESTMENTS
Earned interest of approximately $1 ,368,000 from our continuing program of investing reserve funds (primarily
capital funds accumulated for construction of required sewerage facilities) has accrued during the first six
months of fiscal 1975-76. As of December 31st, approximately 95% of the Districts' cash funds were invested
In short-term government securities or time deposits as shown below. The balance of cash on hand was earning
Interest in commingled investments with the County Treasurer's office.
Amount Percent
Cash on Hand $ 2,368,949 4.6%
Investments in Gov't Securities 49,088,959 ~
Total (Al 1 Districts) $51,4571908 100.0%
JOINT OPERATING FUND
This fund accounts for operation, maintenance, and administrative activities relative to the Districts' jointly-
owned treatment and disposal facilities.
Salaries and Wages -As previously reported funds were not included in the budget for salary increases
granted by the Boards pursuant to agreements with employee groups. However, because of payroll savings
resulting from unfilled positions, the budget allocation should be sufficient to carry through the fiscal
year.
Employees' Benefits -Includes Retirement, Workmen's Compensation, Group Medical Insurance, and Uniforms.
Gasoline, Oil, and Fuel -As the Directors are aware, significant cost increases in petroleum products
have been experienced. The Districts' cooperative purchasing arrangement for gasoline and diesel fuel
with the County of Orange has been superseded by Federal petroleum allocation and price regulations.
Barring further increases, the budget allocation should suffice.
Insurance -Annual premiums are expensed at time of payment which is generally during the first quarter.
It is becoming increasingly difficult to place this coverage because of the reluctance of carriers to
insure governmental agencies. Premiums have doubled in the past two years.
Chlorine and Odor Control Chemicals -Primarily for odor control at treatment plant sites. Our chlorine
contract expired in December and although last year's chlorine unit costs increased 55%, the new unit
price bid was down.
Chemical Coagulants -The staff has been able to temporarily change the mode of operation which has
precluded the necessity of using chemicals at the rate originally anticipated and yet enable the Districts
to meet the current enforced discharge regulations. Additionally, we have been able to obtain improved
q~ality chemicals at lower cost which has reduced the cost.
Contractual Services -Expenditures to date are for sludge hauling and EDP services. Because of escalating
costs and increasing volumes a budget transfer for this account may be necessary.
Professional Services -Includes cost of General Counsel's fees and audit fees paid through December 31st.
Printing and Publications -Reproduction policies have been changed to minimize costs. However,
continuing demand by the public for information on District activities, coupled with increased volume
and "paper work" required by other ~gencies and spiraling costs keep this item on the uptrend. It is
anticipated that a budget transfer will be required for this account.
Rents ~nd Leases -Equipment -Primarily for the rental of large equipment necessary for removing and
replacing equipment and other necessary work during the course of maintenance and repair operations.
Repairs and Maintenance -Parts and supplies for repair of plant facilities. Escalating costs continue
to have a significant impact on this item.
Research and Monitoring -Annual share of participation in Southern California Coastal Water Research
Project has been paid, and expense to date includes estimated allocations for the first six months of
1975-76.
-2-
f"'
Utilities -The major item in the Utilities Expense Account is for purchased electrical power, which has
Increased substantially due to the Increase of petroleum cost to the electrical utilities. A portion is
from. rising demand as flows increase and new facilities are placed into service.
Prior Year's Expense -This account represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account
balance from the previous year.
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND
This fund accounts for the costs of expanding and improving the Districts' presently-owned treatment and disposal
facilities and represents an average of 41% of each individual District's budget requirements for 1975-76.
During the first six months, $8.5 mill ion was expended on joint works treatment and disposal facilities expansion,
primarily on the $29.6 million 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 1, approxi-
mately 84% of which wil 1 be grant funded. The share of joint works expansion costs are reflected in the financial
statements of the respective Districts.
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS -The statements reflect the accounting transactions for the seven Districts and include
each respective District's share of the Joint Operating Fund and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund.
Taxes -Approximately 51% of the budgeted property taxes for 1975-76 have been received through December 31st.
Federal and State Construction Grants -Construction Grant funds received during the period amount to $7.5
mil lion, all on the 46 MGD Activated Sludge project. Presently, State and Federal agencies will fund
87-1/2% of 11 approved 11 treatment projects. However, these agencies have advised that payments wi 11 be
limited to 80% of the grant amount until an acceptable revenue program is adopted. The staff has previously
advised the Directors that our revenue program, even though it has been used as a 11 model 11 by the State, is
unacceptable because it includes ad valorem taxes for operation, maintenance and capital recovery charges.
The Boards are aware that our Districts, along with other large sewering agencies across the nation, are
vigorously supporting HR 9560 which would amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to allow ad valorem
taxes, and result in a substantial overhead cost savings to the Districts taxpayers. Passage of the amend-
ment appears somewhat in doubt at this time and it wil 1 therefor be necessary for the Boards to consider
adoption of a program implementing 11 user charges 11 to assure receipt of the ful 1 grant allocation. Prohibi-
tion of ad valorem taxes will also have a substantial affect on long-range funding programs of the Districts.
This restriction, coupled with other factors as reported on in the budget transmittal, will have the most
immediate impact on Districts 5 and 6.
Connection Fees -Districts 5 and 7 have .had connection charges for several years. Connection fees became
effective in Districts 2 and 3 on October 1, 1973. District 5 revenues have dropped off considerably (only
23% of last year's budget was received) during the last several months and collections this year are running
behind budget. District 7 fees have also decreased substantially over the past two years. District 2 is
running substantially behind the budget and District 3 is about as projected. However, some cities are not
remitting fees to the District on schedule. Further, the budgets for these two Districts are approximately
54% and 25% respectively, of the original annual forecast made by the financial consultant.
Other Revenue -Except as footnooted, consists primarily of interest income, various fees, and sale of
capacity rights.
District Construction -Represents expenditures on Districts' Master Plan construction program of trunk
sewers. The average 1975-76 budget for this item is 45% for the seven Districts. However, this average
is influenced by the major programs of Districts 2 and 3. Itemization of each project is included on the
lower portion of each District's financial statement. The total expenditures for the seven Districts
during the first quarter was $8,932,385.
Share of Joint Works Construction -Represents Districts' share of joint treatment and disposal facil itics
expansion. Discussed above under Capital Outlay Revolving Fund.
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense -Payment of principal and interest on outstanding general obligation
bonds of the respective Districts. Annual expense for all Districts is approximately $2.3 mill ion.
Share of Joint Operating -Represents Districts' share of operating and maintaining jointly-owned treatment
and disposal faci Ii ties, and administrative activities. Costs are distributed based upon each District's
respective gallonage flow (see Joint Operating Fund statement for details).
District Operating and Other Expenditures -Consists primarily of individual Districts' general operating
expenses and operation, maintenance, and repair of the respec~ive Districts' collection systems.
J. Wayne Sylvester
Director of Finance
and Board Secretary
-3-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF -ORANGE COUNTY
SUMMARY JOINT OPERATING BUDGET REVIEW
Six Months Ended 12-31-75
SALARIES, WAGES & BENEFITS
Salaries & Wages
Employee Benefits
Sub-total Payroll
Less: Chargebacks to Dists & CORF
Net Joint Operating Payroll
MATERIALS, SUPPLIES & SERVICES
Gasoline, Oil & Fuel
Insurance
Office Expense
Operating Expense
Chlorine & Odor Control Chemicals
Chemical Coagulants
'"Other Operating Supplies
Contractual Services
Professional Services
Printing & Publications
Rents & Leases--Equipment
Repairs & Maintenance
Research & Monitoring
Travel, Meeting & Training
Utilities
Other Expenses
Prior Years Expenses
Total Material & Supplies
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE
Less: Revenues
NET JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE
BUDGET
1975-76
3,205,665
609,161
3,814,826
1.100 '000
2. 714. 826
60,000
45,000
25,000
187,000
320,000
127,000
88,000
74,000
30,000
26,000
325,000
154,500
17,000
870,000
19,000
20,000
2,387,500
5, 102, 326
250,000
4,852,326
FLOW IN
MILLION GALS
GALLONAGE CHARGES
1
2
3
5
6
7
11
3,600
10' 176
10' 698
1,841
1,835
2,053
2.268
32,471
MG
MG
YEAR TO DATE
1,329,664
208., 522
1,538,186
465,986
1,072,200
20,968
39,822
8,164
54,848
28, 6 71
36,626
35 J 106
18,480
17,434
9,228
135,269
79,282
8,044
254,151
8,207
13,421
767,721
1,839,921
130' 510
1, 709' 411
GALLONAGE
.CHARGE
1?9,519
535, 708'
563,188
96,918
96,602
108' 079
119' 397
1. 709,411
REMAINING
BUDGET
1,876,001
400,639
2,276,640
634,014
1,642,626
39,032
5,178
16,836
132, 152
291,329
90,374
52,894
55,520
12,566
16' 772
189,731
75,218
8,956
615,849
10,793
6,579
1, 619. 779
3,262,405
119 ,490
3,142,915
COUNTY SAtJITATION DISTRICT MO. 1
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
December 31, 1975
BUDGET Rl~VIE\·!
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVE'llr!ES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Pees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Endj.ng Fund Balances, December 31
1975-76
Budget
1,215,590
1,412,000
37,000
335,457
1,985,000
4,434,738
93, 888 (1)
590,566
63, 350 (1)
FACILI~IES EXPANSION
CON8:lRUCTIOH IN PROGRESS: ----·--------
Dyer Road Trunk Improvements
Share of Joint Works Expansion
CO]'vJI'[,E:.CED PROPERTY., PLANT & EQUIP1'IE'NT:
Land and Prop2rty Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facllities
Disposal Facilities .
General Plant and Administrative
Fac~_li ties
Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities
Total Property Plant & Equip~cnt
Balance
6-30--75
4
1,766,368_
1,766,372
21,657
4,241,700
11, 593
13,709
5,660,5$2
11, 715 '58·3
(1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves
Remaininc '-"'
Year to Date Budp;et
4,608,259
604,583
713,980
4,371
154,145
6,085,338
-0-
816, 262
81,681
188,137
12, 301
l, 098, 381
4,986,957
197 5-7. 6
Additions
816,262
816,262
611,007
698,020
32,629
181,312
1,985,000
3,618,476
12,207
402,429
51,049
Balance
J..?..:~l-_75. -
4
2,582,630
2,582,634
21,657
4,241,700
11, 593
13,709
5,660,552 ~
__ 81_62_~.?_~--12 ,?_3}_, __ ~~5 __
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
December 31, 1975
BUDGET REVIEW
Remaining 1975-76
Budget Year to Date Budget
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, December 31
5,264,912
4,442,000
829,000
7,415,808
19,268,424
10,657,644
553,982(1)
1,523,173
217,700(1)
FACILITIES EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Santa Ana River Interceptor Projects
Yorba Linda Pump Station
Carbon Canyon Interceptors
Kraemer Interceptor
Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor
Other Projects
Share of Joint Works Expansion
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP~JENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative
Facilities
"-'uity in Joint Treatment Facilities
Total Property Plant & Equipment
Balance
6-30-75
251,431
324,094
1,600,596
155,135
1,410,689
48,768
3,790,713
5,554,102
9,344,815
315,333
24,729,699
1,186
33' 172
33,582
17,798,828
52,256,615
(1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves
13,915,782
2,660,774
2,245,012
256,373
810, 033
19,887,974
1,137,623
2,566,622
124,322
531,796
66,679
4,427,042
15,460,932
1975-:76
Additions
307,970
334,608
3,960
474,097
11, 063
5,925
1,137,623
2,566,622
3,704,245
3,704,245
2,604,138
2,196,988
572,627
6,604,775
18,130,801
8,091,022
429,660
991, 377
. 151,021
Balance
12-31-75
559,401
658,702
1,604,556
629,232
1,421,752
54,693
4,928,336
8' 120' 724
13,049,060
315,333
24,729,699
1,186
33' 172
33,582
17,798,828
55,960,860
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3
SUMMARY QU/\RTERLY FI N,~NC I AL REPORT
December 31, 1975
BUDGET REVIEW
Remain in~ 1975-76
Budget Year to Date Budget
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENU8S:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees .
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, December 31
7,437,449
5,183,000
629,000
1,073,000
18,258,550
8,841,250
776 ,546 (1)
1,664,462
424' 300 (1)
FACILITIES EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Knott Interceptor Projects
Imperial Relief Interceptor
Westside Relief Interceptor Projects
Other Projects
Share of Joint Works Expansion
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative
Facilities
Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities
Total Property Plant & Equipment
Balance
6-30-75
7,091,769
844,530
131,870
3,685
8,071,854
6,121,797
14,193,651
266,131
23,833,572
15,036
28,419
.
52,006
19,618,078
58,006,893
(1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves
15,857,645
3,739,998
2,474,479
394,219
484,556
22,950,897
7,252,691
2,828,960
155,641
559,052
88,650
10,884,994
12,065,903
1975-76
Additions
5,759,856
376
1,436,987
SS, 4 72
7,252,691
. 2,828,960
10,081,651
10,081,651
3,697,451
2,708,521
234,781
588,444
11,005,859
6,012,290
620,905
1,105,410
335,650
Balance
12-31-75
12,851,625
844,906
1,568,857
59,157
15,324,545
8,950,757
24,275,302
266,131
23,833,572
15,036
28,419
52,006
19,618,078"-'t
68,088,544
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRI-CT NO. 5
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
December 31, 1975
BUDGET REVIEW
Remaining 1975-76
Budget Year to Date Budget
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Snare of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, December 31
1,012,092
985,000
65,000
219,497
1,228,798
2' 409, 119
28' 965 (1)
297,824
250,920(1)
FACILITIES EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Pump Station Modifications
NIWA Planning
Coast Highway Force Main Litigation
Other Projects
Share of Joint Works Expansion
• COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative
Facilities
~uity in Joint Treatment Facilities
Total Property Plant & Equipment
Balance
6-30-75
27,981
2,000
1,512
760
32,253
1,232,177
1,264,430
6,231
3,096,885
7,347
7' 115
8,946
3,948,667
8,339,621
(1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves
2,017,349
516,109
498,056
27,664
79,201
3,138,379
10' 024
569,405
24' 391
96,225
89,324
789,369
2,349,010
1975-76
Additions
2,676
410
6,938
10,024
569,405
579,429
579,429
495,983
486,944
37,336
140,296
1,218,774.
1, 839' 714
4,574
201,599
161,596
Balance
12-31-75
30,657
2,000
1,922
7,698
42' 277
1,801,582
1,843,859
6,231
3,096,885
7' 34 7
7' 115
8,946
3,948,667
8,919,050
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
December 31, 1975
BUDGET REVIEW
Remaining~ 1975-76
Budget Year to Date Bud~et
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, December 31
632,004
873,000
5,000
133,152
571, 000
2,695,137
35, 546 (1)
302,907
61, 340 (1)
FACILITIES EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Pump Station Modifications
Coast Highway Force Main Litigation
Other Projects
Share of Joint Works Expansion
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PDANT & EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
.Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative
Facilities
Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities
Total Property Plant & Equipment
Balance
6~30-75
7,405
90
274
7,769
1,092,580
1,100,349
562
618,344
2,653
7,394
16,237
3,501, 311
5,246,850
(1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves
2,213,295
315,632
441,629
3,255
73,851
3,047,662
2,530
504,895
30,138
95,894
13,960
647,417
·2,400,245
1975-76
Additions
24
2,506
2,530
504,895
507,425
507,425
316, 372
431, 371
1,745
59,301
568,470
2,190,242
5,408
207,013
47,380
Balance
12-31-75
7,405
114
2,780
10' 299
1,597,475
1,607,774
562
618,344
2,653
7,394
16,237
3,501,311""""'<
5,754,275
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
SUMMARY QU/\RTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
December 31, 1975
BUDGET REVIEW
Remaining 1975-76
Budget Year to Date Budget
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, December 31
2,005,595
1,225,000
156,000
1,335,495
3,356,841
4,921,573
694,061(1)
340,516
245,275(1)
FACILITIES EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Tustin-Orange Trunk Projects
Other Projects
Share of Joint Works Expansion
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP~fENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative
Facilities
~,uity in Joint Treatment Facilities ...,,,.,
Total Property Plant & Equipment
Balance
6-3.0-75
569,167
2,395
571,562
1,531,845
2, 103,407
230,165
16,003,785
10,782
12,440
4,908,993
23,269,572
(1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves
5, 106, 557
1,022,161
619,184
110, 102
172, 379
7,030,383
532,359
707,885
388,766
107, 271
77,802
1,814,083
5,216,300
1975-76
Additions
532,359
532,359
707,885
1,240,244
1,240,244
983,434
605,816
45,898
1,163,116
2,824,482
4,213,688
305,295
233,245
167,473
Balance
12-31-75
1,101,526
2,395
1,103,921
2,239,730
3, 343' 651
230,165
16,003,785
10,782
12,440
4,908,993
24,509,816
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRI{T NO. 11
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
December 31, 1975
BUDGET REVIEW
Remaining'-" 1975-76
Budget Year to Date Budget
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVBNUES:
Taxes--
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees .
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, December 31
1, 217, 106
1,051,000
5,000
418,523
2,741,000
3,140,553
94,700(1)
362,878
212,520(1)
FACILITIES EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Slater Ave. Pump Station Wet Well
Slater Ave. Pump Station Modifications
Master Plan Report
Other Projeets
Share of Joint Works Expansion
COMPLETED PROPERTY~ PLANT & EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative
Facilities
Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities
Total Property Plant & Equipment
Balance
6-30-75
52,030
7,698
1,302
61,030
1,314,073
1,375,103
18, 711
3,797,881
3,053
19,936
4,211,117
9,425,801
(1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves
4,328,622
622,612
531,159
7,867
136,875
5,627, 135
(2, 842)
607,250
28,300
118, 537
35,577
786,822
4,840,313
197 5-7 6
Additions
9
(2' 851)
(2, 842)
607,250
604,408
604,408
594,494
519,841
(2,867)
281,648
2,743,842
2,533,303
66,400
244,341
176, 943
Balance
12-31-75 -----
52,030
7,707
1,302
(2, 851)
58,188
1,921,323
1, 979, 511
18, 711
3,797,881
3,053
19,936
4,211,117
10,030,209
lo._ ~ ...w.r-
March 12, 1976
MEMORANDUM
TO: Fred A. Harper
RE: Building Conuni ttee Meeting Scheduled for March 30
After the March 10th joint meeting, Director Culver requested
that the Building Committee members be invited to the Executive
Committee meeting also and the Building Committee could then
split off and meet separately. I mentioned to Nonn that the
Executive agenda would probably be very short and I didn't foresee
any problem.
JWS:rb
ayne Sylvester
!rector of Finance
and Board Secretary
CHAIRMAN WINN 3-10-76
No. 6-A
CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR 5:30 P.M.J ~~,MARCH~. INVITE DIRECTORs(§ALs~ A~
OR DIRECTORS DAVIS AND DOSTAL.
THERE WILL ALSO BE A MEETING OF THE BUILDING COMMITTEE AT
THE ABOVE HOUR AND DATE. ~ ~ ~ -b.~~-~.
~
~
~
~
~
MEETING DATE March 11, 1'7' TI ME 7: 31 p. m. IISHtICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11
DISTRICT 1 1,,,.r'
RIMA •••• ~it· ,/ _+. __ _
(a.-t:DR I CH) .•.•.. BATTIN . [t ... -y--
(EVANS) .•.....•.. GARTHE ••.•• -I--.,,_----r-----(EDGAR) .•.•••..•• SHARP ••...•• ___ .... __ _
I T 2 ... ,~l~~ ,,. DISTR C ,,,t ,tf-~) 1l-,,1'
(LYONS).~····· .. • CALLAHAN... v + -
!
EWING) ...•.••... CHAPUT .•.••• -v---;.----. -
) ---v-----DIEDRICH ••••.• CLARK....... --+-
GARTtf EL ..•.•.. EVANS....... " -~.
THOt91) ...•.••.•.. KAYWOOD •••. _./ __ + _ ___:::
FOX) ............ MAC KA I ~.. / + + ( -;--..... -------= HOYT) •.•••.••.•• SM I TH •••... ·------
PERRY....... / -+
(HOLLINDEN) ••.•. SCOTT....... I -..._
~DUNN~). •••.•...• WINN .•••..•. + __::_ _±__
WARD) ••••.•••... WOOD. • . • • • . • + ..._
GRAHAM} ••..••.. YOUNG....... .I + ~
DISTRICT 3
~HOMRIGHt\USEN). COX ••••••••. _J __ _
COLLINS) ....... BYRNE •.••••. _I ___ ==
CULVER..... .J
(GRIFFIN). .••... DAVIS....... .; == == ~< .. 'HHEl •••••••• EVANS ••••••. _.; ____ _
~ KAIN) .••..• FOX •...• ~-!·._" ____ _
'./'• " !NEV I LJ .......... GRAHAM •• Ji~. _____ _
THOM) ••••••••••• KAYWOOD •••• ~ ___ _
SONJU) ••• \ •••••• MAC LA IN ••• _.; ____ _
BLACKMANJ •.•••• MC KNEW .... ~ ___ _
OLSON. • • • • • . .I
(DIEDRICH) .••••• SCHMIT .•..•• -.;-----
(GIBBS) .......... SHIPLEY. .... -r == ==
(HOLLINDEN) ..•• SVALSTAD... .I ___ _
{WOOD) .••...•.... -WAittJ. ••••••• -Y-
(ARB I SO l ........ ~ ./ == ==
DISTRICT 5 "O~) -µJ£)
RYC KOFF \ ..•... MC INNIS... ./ ' . ./ v
DIEDRICHJ .•••.• RILEY....... v" / ,/.
ROGERS. •••.. _v-_ --"-__ ,_
DISTRICT 6
(MC INNIS) .•.... STORE ....••• ~ ___ _
(DIEDRICH) ..•••. BATTIN. ••••. __:!__ ___ _
RIMA •....•.. _L_ ___ _
DISTRICT 7 (-zJ1~ .1 ?ck} ~ 11,Jf ~·~ NS) ......... GARTHE..... v + ~
AlrfHONY) •...•.. BURTON ••••. -../---r-~
DIEDRICH) •••••. CLARK ..•••. -./---:Z--~
(MC INNIS) •.•... DOSTAL..... / _.__ -
GLOCKNER... ./ ~ +
(HOYT); ••••...•.• SMITH....... " --
(EDGAR) •••.•••••. SALTARELLI._/_ ~ --=
DISTRICT 11
(DIEDRICH) ...••. SCHMIT. ••••. _.; ____ _
DU KE. • • . • • . . "
( Wd EDERl. •.••••• GI BBS....... .; == ==
DISTRICT 8
JOHNSON) ••••••• HOLM ••••••• ~ EDWARDS •••• _____ _
DIEDRICH) •••••• RILEY ••.•••• ======
3/10/76
JOINT BOARDS
DIEDRICH ..•... BATTIN •...•.• ~ __
ANTHONY) ......•. BURTON ......• _/ __ _
COLL I ~s ) ......•. BYRNE .•.••..• _v_ --
LYONS) .......••. CALLAHAN ..... _.; __ _
EWING .......... CHAPUT .••..•. _./ __ _
DIEDRICH). .....• CLARK........ ./
HOMR I GHAUSEN) .. COX .••.•••.••• -" ---
CULVER .•••••• -./---
(GRIFFIN) .•.••... DAV IS .••••••• -./ -j f Gtf
(Mc INN Isl ...... DOSTAL ..••••. / <~ t , ~~
(GIBBS) .••....... DUKE......... .I
(GARTHE) ..•..••.. EVANS .•..•••• -../---
(MAC KA I N l ...... F 0 X ..•..••••• ---Y---
(EV AN s). · · · · · · · · ·GARTHE· • • • • • • -v---
(WI EDER).······· ·GIBBS········ ./ ==
GLOCKNER • • • • '
(NEVIL) •••••••••• GRAHAM ••••••• -/---
~HOYT). • · • • · • · • • • SM I TH· • · · · • • • v == THO~) •••.••••••• KAYWOOD. • • • • • .;
FOX) . ) ••••••••• ~-• • • =.I ==
S 0 NJ U • • • • • • • • . . MAC LA I N • • • • .1
(RYCOFF) ....•.... MC INNIS. .••• -"---
(BLACKMAN) •..... MC KNEW...... " ==
OLSON........ J
(HOYT) ...•.•..•. SM I TH. . . • . • . • .1 ==
PERRY........ .I
(DIEDRICH) ..•... RILEY ••.••.•• --y-==
RIMA ••.•••.•• -"-__
ROGERS....... "
~EDGAR) •• ) ..•••. SALTARELLI .• J ==
DIEDRICH ..•... SCHMIT •.••••• _.., __ _
HOLLINDEN) SCOTT........ "
I
G I BBS) ..•...•... SH I PLEY .••••• _fl:_ ==
MC INNIS) •..... STORE •••••••• __lt_
HOLLI NDEN) SVALSTAD •••• ___:L_ ==
WOOD) •...•.•.••. ~ ....•••• ~ __
ARB I SO) ..•••.•.. wt I SHAU P-1 .•. -v.
DUNNY) ..•...•... WINN .•..••••. -..;---
~ --WARD ••.•..•..•. WOOD ........ ~
GRAHA~) ••••••••• YOUNG •••••••• ___L_ ==
EDGAR •••••••.•• SHARP. • • . • • • • ~·
OTHERS
l • ({ · .' I t~u 1 · (..
~ . (J
1Jt (~<-G I L:"·' "I .~ I f'.,.I ..... : t;1 (4l'f ,." ·,_, _, ;
\.l . .' f I ' ,• J I I
/ ·. ,I:'. ~f·
v .... ' _I. . lj
HARPER
SYLVESTER
LEWIS
CLARKE
TAYLOR
BROWN
(' l A..-' ..... i1f. WOODRUFF \l.{v~ · ·.···~EWING
01 .;/' -, t ·: .. HOH EN ER
· .. , • t a_,,1 •• ) HOWARD
. V~ . HUNT
I. ' ' •. ,._/ KEITH
J J '~ .. -l KENNEY
tJ· LYNCH
MADDOX
MARTINSON
PIERSALL
STEVENS
TRAVERS
/
v
/
MEETING DATE March 10, 1976 TI ME 7: 30 P. m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11
<.~~<.) DISTRICT 1 '7<--n-\
RIMA ••..•.•• _..L.. ~ _
(nTEDR ICH) .••..• BATTIN..... ~ __
( .... , .. ,~NS) ...••..•.. GARTHE ••.•• ~ Y-__
(EDGAR) .•••••..•• SHARP....... V" .:j__ __
*t'-#(4)
DISTRICT 2 . ~~to-1~-9\.
(LYONS)·········· CALLAHAN .•• ~ .t.,_ . tJ
(EWING) .•..•••••• CHAPUT...... ......--~ ~
( D I ED R I CH) •••••• CLARK. • • . • • • -V N ~
~GARTtiEl •.••••.. EVANS •••.••• ~ t Y THO~) •••••••.•.• KAYWOOD •.•• ____J£:_ ~
FOX) •••.••••••.. MAC l(A I H ••• ~ ~
(HOYT) ••••••••••• SM I TH........ v-' _J__ ~
PERRY •..•.•• ~ __& -L-
( HOLL I NDEN) ••••• SCOTT ••••••• ~ __hL +=
WARD) ••••••••.•• WOOD ••.••••• ___k::::_ Y ' ~DUNN~) .•••.•.•.• WINN •••••.•• ~ __bl
GRAHAM} ••..•••• YOUNG ••.•.•• _.k:::__ ~ ~
DISTRICT 3
(HOMRIGH(\USEN). COX ......... _J.L. ___ _
(COLLINS) .•••••. BYRNE •.••.•• ~ ___ _
CULVER..... v"
(GRIFFIN). •..•.. DAVIS •••..•. ~ == ==
(GARTH EL .••.••• EVANS •.•••.• ~ ___ _
(MAC KA IN) •••••• FOX ••.••.••. __lL_
(NEVIlJ •••••••••• GRAHAM ••••• ~ == ==
(THOM) ••••••••••• KAYWOOD •••• _k::::: ___ _
(soNJU) ••• \ •••••• MAC LAIN ••• ~ ----
(BLACKMANJ •••.•• MC KNEW •••• ~ ___ _
OLSON •••••.• ~
(DIEDRICH) •••••• SCHMIT •••••• ~ == ==
(GIBBS) .......... SllIPLE't! .••• ~ ___ _
~HOLLINDEN) •••• SVALSTAD ••• ~ ___ _
WOOD) ........... \·JARS:". .. • • • • V--
ARB I SOL ....... \+EISllAUPT .• ~== ==
DISTRICT 5 ~ct.o.J ot0Co)
(RYCKOFF)) .••••• MC INNIS ••• ~ __L_ i_
(DIEDRICH •••••• RILEY •••.••• ~ __:/__ _r
ROGERS. •.••. ~ _L_ _y__
DISTRICT 6
(MC INNIS) ...... STORE •••••.. _k:::_ ___ _
(DIEDRICH) •••••• BATTIN. .•••. ~ ___ _
RIMA •.••••.• ~ ___ _
DISTRICT 7 ~~.i-'1 ~ 3'D(w
EVANS ....••••. GARTHE ••••. ~ .Y__ ..:i_
t -HONY) .•••••• BURTON..... v-_j__ _j_
~DR I CH). • • • • • CLARK . • • • • • _k:::_ 1_ _:::f__
(MC INN Is) •••.•• DOSTAL •••.• ~ .:f._ ~
G LOCKNER . • • _k:::::._ L_ .:f__
(HOYT))· •••.•••..• SMITH······· a.-.-----1'{ N
(EDGAR •••.•••••• SALTARELLI. ~ .:f___ ~
DISTRICT 11
(DIEDRICH) •••••• SCHMIT...... V-___ _
DUKE........ ~
(WIEDERL ••••••• GIBBS .••••.• ~====
D STRICT 8
3/10/76
JOINT BOARDS
DI EDR IC~ ...••. BATTIN ••..••• ~ __
ANTHONY ....•••. BURTON....... V"" __
COLLI ~S .....•.. BYRNE •••••.•• ~ __
LYONS) .......••. CALLAHAN ••••• ~ __
EWING ...•...•.• CHAPUT •.••••• ~ __
DIEDRICH). ...•.• CLARK •••••••• ~
HOMRIGHAUS EN) •• COX. •.••...••• ____k:::_ ==
CULVER ••••••• _lL:_
(GR I FF I N ) ••••..•• DAV I S •••••••. ~ --
(MC INNIS l ...... DOSTAL ....... ~ :Ji'~~
(GIBBS) •••....... DUKE......... v
( GARTHE) •••.••••. EVANS •••••••• ---V --
( MAC KA I N l ...... F 0 X • • • • • • • • • • ~ --
(EV ANS).········ ·GARTHE· • • • • • • ~ == (WIEDER)·········GIBBS········~ __
GLOCKNER •••• ~
(NEVIL) •••••••••• GRAHAM ••••••• ~ ==
rn~s) ........... KAYWOOD •••••• ---><C_ --!HOYT). • • · • · • • • • • SM I TH· • · · • • · • ~ --
............ t4AG l<A I N •••• --=-
SO NJ U) .•••..•••• MAC LAIN •••• ~ --
(RYCOFF) •..•....• MC INNIS. •••• ~ --
(BLACKMAN) •••.•• MC KNEW •.•••• ~ ==
OLSON •••••••• __k::::. __
(.....,) .......... 11\IFJO ....... ~ __
PERRY •••••••• ~
(DIEDRICH) ••.••. RILEY ••.•.••• ~==
RIMA ..••.•••• ~ __
ROGERS....... i.......-
~EDGAR) •• )" ..•.. SALTARELLI •• ~ --
DIEDRICH ...... SCHMIT ••••••• ~ __
HOLL I NDEN) SCOTT •••.•••• ~ __
~-6 I BBS~-........ ~ Sii I PLEY...... -
MC INNIS) .•.•.• STORE •••••••• ~ --
HOLLINDEN) SVALSTAD •••• ~ ==
(WOOD) ••..•.•.•.. WARD •••••.••• ~ __
(ARB I so) ...••••.• WE I 811AtJfi'T ••• =-.JL.._
(DUNN~) •..•••••.. WINN ••••.•••• ~== ~~) •••••••••• ..4~88B-. • • • • • • • • -
~ GRAHA~) ••••••••• YOUNG........ ,,._.--==
EDGAR •••••••••• SHARP. • . • . • • • ,,_..
OTHERS
HARPER
SYLVESTER
LEWIS
CLARKE
TAYLOR
BROWN
WOODRUFF
EWING
HOH EN ER
HOWARD
HUNT
KEITH
KENNEY.
LYNCH
MADDOX
MARTINSON
PIERSALL
STEVENS
TRAVERS
..
'6-a)
(6-b)
3/10/76 Joint Mtg.
Report of the Join t Chairman
Reported that Mr . Harper and he and members of locally-e l ected officials
committee (listed names) met with Win Adams in Sacramento, and another Board
member a nd director of the SWRCB . Said they met to comprise committee.
Elected officials & GM met in Jl!Orning and had luncheon meeting with Win Adams.
Said after much discussion, it was conc l uded that with the efforts of the
e lected officials throughout most of the sanitary districts and the rapport of
the Genera l Manager, that the avenue to the SWRCB members is already there.
Their concern was that our efforts would be better directed and concentrated on
our elected officials in Washington, n.c . Said it seems like our little
efforts sometimes get l ,ost in the shuffle back there. Unless it is a problem of
major important anc e to everybody on the West Coast, one sanitary district doesn't
have much chance of getting things done. Advised that they have asked elected
officials and General Managers of these agencies to write down their thoughts and
send to us and we would coTl!liile a recommendation here to either expand committee
or redirect committee. Wil l send materia l out to Directors before next meeting .
FAH added that along the line of getting our Congressional delegates to function
in these areas of interest here i n California, it appears that we are just going
to have to try to develop a lot closer relationship with some of these Congressmen .
We have the l arges t state delegation in Washington. Possibly, this comm ittee working
with the State Board could develop positions that would be of state-wide interest
and then attempt to get the attention of the Ca l ifornia de l egati on . Said he thought
that this was the challenge that seemed to come out loud and clear. Said there
seems to be some differences between the Gov ernor 's office and some of the membe rs
on the State Board at the present time . Things should gel within next six months .
Working through Governor 's office will get the attention of California de l egation
. but will take a lot of work to get this to come about . (Called E .C. mtg . later. See
item after #14 -b .)
Report of the General Manager
FAH advised that we have been reporting every month regarding the pilot unit on
the JPL-ACTS process. Hope to have it in operation the end of this mont h . Have
it staffed and have been working out the bugs in the process . Most of the equipme nt
is here now . Said h e thought the Directors wou l d be very pleased with th e whole
unit. Cou l d maybe show some slides of the l ayo ut at the next meeting . Said this
demonstrates that something can be built in a very short period of time once the
agency is given the l ati tude to move ahead . Said h e hopes we have come up with
a process that is very worthwhile.
Also advised that by the 26th of this month we hope to be paying the bills on a
biweekly basis . Listing of bills wi l l then be mailed wi th agenda .
Reported that staff is beginning to work on budgets. Will be presenting things to
Directors in the next coup l e months on areas we should be moving ahead .
Advised that State h as certified to EPA a considerable amount of money fo r Step 2
grant--des ign phase of 75 MGD Activated Sludge Plant. Have solicited proposals
from numerous engineering fi rms and will be coming to Board with recomme ndation,
maybe in April .
FAH a l so advised that h e has been invited by EPA , at their expense, to go to Russia
for a symposium in July and with the Board's permission, is planning on going .
..
(6-c)
(9)
(9-d)
(9-e)
(9-n)
(13)
(14)
Report of the Genera l Counsel
TLW briefly reported that with respect to District 2, we have all but concluded
the acquisition of the necessary right of way for the Santa Ana River Interce ptor .
Acquired entire right of way without a single condenmation action. All have agreed
in principal .
CONSENT CALENDAR
Questioned whether the insurance requirements were in the specs. Was answered, yes
but WNC explained the incorrect limit was the staff's error . Moved & seconded item.
Asked who were the employees going to conference and who so many? FAH exp lained
that there were three operational people and three from engineering department and
himself. Said this is a once a year type meeting and is state-wide . We generally
send 10 people but because of location we cut back to 7 . Said these are people that
are involved in the industrial waste and some of the engineering aspects, as wel l
as · operations people . Is a three-day fair l y concentrated meeting. Don't often have
meeting in Lake Tahoe but will meet jointly with Nevada group. Asked if there was
any kind of control on expenses and was told there was. Asked for projected cos t
and FAH estimated between $1500-2000. Item was then moved, seconded & carried.
Culver said he was shocked at differe nce in bid results and hoped specifications
were clear. WNC explained that there were two ways to go--repair or replace . One
contractor chose replace and Rewes-Schock chose repair . Said contractor was happy
with bid . Moved & seconded to approve award.
DISTRICT 5 -Chairman requested that item #20 be mo ved up on agenda due to personal
reasons. (Director Rogers still recouperating from heart surgery and needed to get
home early.) SEE ITEM 20 . Moved, seconded & carried by roll call vote.
DISTRICT 2 -Comp & Mileage Res o
Joint Chairman Winn turned meeting over to Cha irman Callahan .
Callahan referred to Tom Woodruff 's l etter. Passed out copies and gave Directors
a few moments to read . Said letter is se lf explanatory . Said Director Chaput
challenged the l ega l ity of the vote and the attorney has made a ru ling on it.
Will take somebody who vote d yes to make motion to reconsider . Said r ecord
shows Chaput and Perez voted no . Callahan then cast motion to reconsider . Wood
stated that motion to reconsider is normally at same meeting . Thought it would
have to be another form of motion . Kaywood then stated she voted no at last
meeting also . Motion to reconsider was seconded .
Woodruff said his recol l ection was that there was no motion to recon?ider l ast
month but the request of Director Chap ut was, in effect, a motion to reconsider .
Second l y, according to the procedural rules that we have, it would still be app ro-
priate to reconside r.
Rol l cal l vote to reconsider Resolution No . 76 -12 -2 . Motion carried 7 :5.·
Woodruff then announced that the i tern now on the floor was co nsideration of
Resolution No. 76 -12-2. It was then moved to approve resolution . Motion
seconded .
Kaywood asked if there was any control on amo unt of expenses subm itted . Call ahan
answered yes, there were controls--exact airplane fare and hotel bill, etc .
Winn also added that if expense account ge ts past JWS, which is hard to do, and
goes to County Auditor, he will check it out if it i s substantial . Winn · advised
that h e had to pay $5 s top -off charge out of his own pocket on last trip.
-2-
..
Ch a put questioned wheth e r exact e :xpenses we re first class or economy? Thou ght
that was one of the points missing from the resolution. Wood s t a ted that s he
thou ght we shou ld have ge neral policy on that in part of this r es olution as to
kinds of standards that we expect for expen s e accoW1ts . Callahan said he was in
f a vor of what Director Wood_ said. Would appoint three members to set policy for
e xp e nses .
Chaput then said that was just half the resolution. Didn't agree with pay for
meetings and doubling the potential of Directors to make money within one month.
Are hiding expenses with this res olution .
Wood added that her concern was a little bit about maximum. Didn't feel that we
will be having five meetings a month but if we should have within next year or two,
thought Directors would come back and then change this policy immediate ly. Was
concerned about total compensation per month or per year but is willing to go
along with policy and see how it works . If in one y e ar it is obvious it has been
abused, have faith that Directors wou ld come back and change it.
Winn indi cated that there would be a nominal number of additional committees
that would be appointed.
Questioned ma ximums--Woodruff said is for four meetings and four days service per
month . After that not compensated . Is for everybody except the Joint Chairman
for Joint Meetings.
Called for the question. Rol l call vote on Resolution 76-12 -2 . Carried 8:4 .
(14-b) DISTRICT 2
Request of Garden Grove Sanitary District referred to Executive Committee .
JOINT CHAIRMAN WINN then ca lled a meeting of the Executive Committee for
Tuesday,March 30th at 5:30 p.m. and invited Directors Culver and Sval stad to
attend. The Building Corrnnittee wou ld a l so be meeting on the 30th. Building
Committee members also invited to Exec. Comm. meeting--Culver, Burton, Glockner,
Graham, and Store .
(26) DISTRICT 1
Saltare lli stated that he didn't think that some people should do the s ame work
as others and not get paid. It was moved and seconded to approve Resolution
No. 76-11-1. Roll call vote. Carried 3:1.
(29) DISTRICT 7 -Annexation policy
Chairman Garthe took over meeting.
Smith moved Reso lution 76-39 -7. Motion seconded. He then stated that with regard
to this item would l ike to yield to fellow councilman Perez who has spent many
hours on this. Said that what he had to say relat e d to annexati on fee also.
Perez then submitted check sheet to be recorded in official minutes. Went through
each point on sheet (10 points). Cal l ed attention to the Special Me eting report
prepared by staff dated January 30. Said he would like to point out to Dire ctors
that on prepaid connection charges for the parcels within the proposed a nn e xation
the amount to be credited in connec tion to the system in the a mount of $250 wi ll
res ult in a subsidy of $106,250 . Asked if this has been the policy of the Districts
in a ny other ins t ance? Submitte d this for reas ons of opposition.
-3-
Perez then ca ll e d to the a tt ention of the proponents and the Directors a
memorandum from the City of Orange. Said i t is not our i ntent to oppose the
needed service in this area. Feel that the City of Orange can a nd will provide
the needed sanit a ry sewer system an d this request is an attempt to a lleviate
the inevitab l e an d logi cal annexation to the City o f Orange.
Smith then stated he would like to revi ew the history of this s ituation. Sai d
a few years ago he had been on t h e Sanitation Distr ict's Board for six years .
There was much discussion regarding sewers of OPA area. Was brought up many
times to District to do something. Never got any r esponse from Di s t r ict that
they were prepared to h e lp provide sewers in that are a, so City of Orange studied
an d studied the area and spent ma ny doll ars to provide sewers for the area as
the District was unable to provide . (Was n ear tears h ere !) District wen t a long
with this . They approved the sewer system size . Said they fee l very strongly in
Orange about this! Even if bond issue passes, that probab ly wo n't be t he en d of it!!
(Was that a threat?) If this is a pproved, is not r i ght and is no t fai r .
Presented li s t of more f ac t s for the record.
Burton then referred to page 8 of the Manager 's Report. Rea d item. Tilen ref erred
to point #10 of document submi tted by City of Or ange . Read. "Tile proposed
annexation fee of $828 .00 per acre will be inequitable to those that have paid
the c urrent ann exation fee of $1,029.00 per acre , unless appropriate refunds a re
made." Asked if th ere h a d been annexati on fees paid of $1029 . an d if so is th e re
a contemplation on the part of staff to r eimburse t hose ? JWS answered that no
a nn exations h a ve been consummated at $1029 figure. FAH then further exp l ained
the Districts' uniform annexation policy -Tile assets of the Distri ct minus liability
divided by number of acres in the Sanitation Di s trict. District 7 is the only
Di s t rict that h as this unusual situation. In their asse ts have inc lude d assessment
district sewers that were constructed by Di s trict and paid for by individual
property owne rs within the District . Tilese are local sewers. Other San i tation
Districts do not have anything i n their books. Going by the defi nition tha t we
h ave u sed in the pas t, we have an inflated asset figure . Tilis was nothing that was
paid for by the taxpayers . FAH said we fee l t o be consistent with the other
San itation Dis tricts, that we should remo ve thes e local sewers b ecause they are
not part of the master plan of t h e District . That is why we are recommen.ding that
this be remove d. Burton ·then stated that if the Boar d was sti ll cons idering
ite m #2 9, didn 't think the docume nts from Orange were pertinent to that item.
Dostal then asked wh a t the last acreage fee was that was charged -answere d $690/acre.
Do have mon ey now in trust for pending annexation at rate of $1029 .
FAH further advised that those sewers are not maintained by Sanitation Districts,
are maintained by Sewer Maintenance Di s t ri ct . Have kept them on our books and
District 7 holds title.
Woodruff the n stated that valuation of sew ers that h ave been constructed through
a s sessment district procee dings h ave some similar ma rket . We use them in two
different ways . (1) We s till carry them on our books as assets in terms of total
assets. (2) Formula used for determining ann exation f ees has been very simple.
Determin e d it not correct to in clude these assets in tha t particular formula.
Devised strictly to cal cul ate a f ee. Because asse ts were not a cquire d with Di s tri ct
funds and yet we do own them, so for accounting purposes we are carryin g them on
the books. All other districts determine their annexation fee on b as is of assets
minus liabi lities divide d by acreage. Said when that mi scal culation was determined,
that is when we felt we were to reduce it. Sa ltarelli asked who was liable to
r e pair thos e sewers . Was answered the 7th SMD . Also asked if this policy was
one of the reasons Di s trict 7 is strongest fin ancially . Answered i t has no be aring.
-4 -
Called for the Question re Re solution No. 76-39 -7. Roll call vote. Carried 6:1.
·o ~) DISTRICT 7 -OPA
Burton questioned Woodruff's letter and asked him to clarify paragraph 1.
TLW said that memo was written Jan. 21st and question was simp ly to come to
District for annexation. Said that request has changed now.
Clark moved we approve the annexation. Said this annexation is to be reviewed on
basis of providing a sewer system and any conflict of City boundaries is probably
in the realm of LAFC. Besides, the bond issue has to be by a 2/3 vote of the
people and think the r e quest here is simply to ge t this moving to LAFC where the
proper authority will be sitting to determine the problem with the City.
Motion seconded by Burton.
Perez reiterated that .their arguments have been submitted in writing in opposition
to both items 29 and 30(c) and called attention to that evidence and their reasons
for opposing the proposal.
Sa l tarelli stated that he could not support the motion. Said it was toe obvious
to him that the proponents have devised a very careful legal measure to avoid
annexation to City of Orange, as we ll as Orange has done. 1\\lo cross currents.
We have an obligation to provide our vote for equity and tax efficiency. This
can be accomplished and sewers can be provided in a less expensive way . Said
he was opposed to passing bond for a fee. Could support a bond for a sewer line
but think they should pay for annexation fee in cash, not bond and pass it on to
future owners. For us to approve 2.50 -4.50 per $100 A.V. is not tax efficiency,
which is who can provide it and how can it be provided at lowest cost to taxpayers.
Burton stated if this pass es tonight and they go to people and are not successful
in annexation and bond vote, they will carry total cost and wHl··not reflect on
Sanitation District No. 7. Woodruff added that whole expense of this including
construction and administrative is that of owners . Agreed with Saltarel li that
it is not tax efficient but thought people should be able to vote th ems elves what -
ever kind of tax they want .
Peggy McElligott responded to Saltarelli. Said the peopl e here involved with are
many rather than a developer or single annexation parce l. Because of that in trying
to raise the $828 per acre becomes a massive job. Almost impossible to accomplish
a cash annexation with the number of people. This is about the only method that
we have been able to evolve that provides a so lution to a real problem in that
area that has been existing for a l ong time . The only way that these people will
get sewers is if they can come together and do it, not inch by inch . Said she has
been invol ved with sewers for 20 years, and has taken a long time on this. There
is nothing set forth to take care of this type o f problem. Have been looking at
growth and deve l opment. Are not looking at that but l ooking at needs of existing
p e ople and property. A law real ly hasn't been resolved to take care of it. Have
tried to come up with e asiest possible way for these peop l e and people in the future .
Said she realizes what Saltarelli is saying. Problem, unfortunately, is that what
you are asking in terms of annexation charge is permanent right to use capital
facilities of Sanitation District. That right goes with the land, not with particular
owner. Value of the property is determine d, in part, by availability of sewer to
that property. Property owner at any point in time doesn 't always have a choice
of whether he can have sewers. Can 't give man a choice in the future of whether
he wants sew e rs or not . We have to face realities of many people not a few. With
re ga rd to th e vote, there a r e a large number of p e ople here at Board me eting from
-5-
OPA who are intere ste d. Th e se peop le are v e ry definit e ly willing to go out and
talk to their nei ghbors and help ma ke the ir de ci s i on. 2/3 vot e is a rough ·· one.
We know of no othe r real fe as ible way of doing it t h a t i s not infl a t e d. This is
the lea st exp ensive way that we can evolve a nd app e ars to be the fairest from
the standpoint of the Sanitation Districts. Do es provide fund a nd fin a ncing.
Sa ltarelli then stated that (1) we have an obligation to all future taxpayers of
this District. Th e se people and those who will be future members who will
purchase this property. Pe ople who live the re now will pay nothing. If we h a ve
a health problem now, is re as on a ble to as sum e tha t value of the property will be
imm e di a tely increased . Person who comes in is now paying higher price and will
be paying annexation fee which made that fee higher also. (2) Borrowing is a way
of life. Will vote for this issue if p e ople will borrow $828 and pay. (3) If
any of these people who own their own hom e s cannot afford $828 for anne xation, then
simple ari the matic tells us they c a nnot afford 40% incre a se in tax rate.
Smith a dded that they felt that there would be the least cost to the residents if
they would cooperate with local entity of government. City can help with
engineering, administrative and even in local lines. Even in the instances of
connection charges. City can help provide services. City of Orange has the local
s ewers. Th i s proposal will not give them the local sewers.
Burton stated that his city believes bonding is a way of life for schools, etc.
Saltarelli dis a greed with connection betwe e n that and this proposal.
Called for the Question. Roll Call vote. Carried 4:3.
Smi t h the n s t a ted the City of Oran ge still will cooperate if el e ction s hould f ail.
(32) DISTRICT 7 -Oth e r bus iness
Re ques ted that staff prepare r esolution for Di s trict 7 to bring the m up to
identical re s olutions f or Dir ectors comp e ns ation and mil eage a s Di stricts 1, 2,
3 & 11 and put on April agenda.
-6-
(~,. ......
February 11, 1976
Annexation to Sanitation District #7 requires election (simple majority) ..,
and payment of annexation fees $828. 00 per acre· ..
2) General Obligation Bond Issue passage for payment of Annexation Fees
only is not feasable.
·3)General Obligation Bond Issue as proposed in the amount of $1,140,000
requires a 2/3 majority.
t;
f}Proposed Bond Issue does not provide any local sewers.
r)The statement by the proponents of this Annexaiion and Bond Issue
relative .to "the District's policy of providing trunk sewers within
one-quarter mile of all properties" is not a guaranteed right of all
properties within the District.
~Annexation to.Sanit~tion District #7 and passage of the proposed Bond
Issue would impose a tax rate of $2.6954 per $100/A.V. but would not
provide any local sewer system or physical connections to the trunk
sewer system.
7)Annexation with complete sewer system would cost approximately
$2,292,000 and would result in a tax rate of approximately $4.40 ±;100 A.V.
) At the present time Orange County Sanitation District #7 has no vested
rights in those portions of reaches 17 or 18 constructed by the city
of Orange.
)The proposed Improvement District is entirely within the official
sphere of influence of the city of Orange as adopted by the Orange
County L.A.F.C.O.
0The proposed annexation fee of $828.00 per acre will be inequitable
to those that have paid the current annexation fee of $1,029.00 per
~acre, unless appropriate refunds are made.
January 22, 1976
· STATUS OF TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER
Trunk sewers are presently completed to Fairhaven and the Flood Control Channel
at Esplanad~. (Reach 12)
Design of reaches 13 thru 16 of the trunk sewer from Fairhaven and Esplanade to
Santiago Canyon Road and Linda Vista is now complete. The District Engineer
will present the plans to the Board for approval 2/11/76 and ask for authroization
to advertise for bids. This would accomplish the completion of the trunk system
to meet the downstream end of the trunk sewer the City built in conjunction
with Klug Development by some time this fall.
/ .
~--~::==;;...,..,-...~ ..... -
The City. fo Orange and the developers, Klu·g Development and Broadmoor Homes, Inc.
have constructed.two sections of the "Master Planned". trunk sewer. The first
sectio~ extends_ from Santiago Canyon Road and Linda Vista to the intersection of
Ora_rige Park Blvd. and Frank St. The second section extends from· a· point
approximately 400' south of Meads Ave. and Handy Creek, along Handy Creek to a
point approximately 725' south of Amapolla. From the upstream end of tpe first
section at Orange Park Blvd. and Frank St. to the down stream end of the second
section, a local 12" sewer has been constructed to connect the two sections of
master planned trunk sewer main. During the design period of the first section
we considered building it along Handy Creek from Santiago Canyon Road, south-eastward,
however, the proposed alignment traversed an extensive multiplicity of ownerships
which would have required a considerable period of time just to acquire the
necessary right of way. We, therefore, constructed it within existing rodad
rights of way except at the southwest corner of Santiago Canyon Road and Orange
Park Blvd. and ended it at Orange Park Blvd. and Frank St.
The local 12" sewer main which·we constructed from this point to the beginning
of the second reach was also built primarily within existing road rights of way.
The capacity of this 12" main is equal to approximately 40% of the trunk sewer.
This will allow a considerable portion of the contributary area upstream of this
section to be served before it becomes necessary to construct the parallel section
of the trunk sewer.
All of these sewer mains belong to the city of Orange. They were built by ·the
city with sewer construction funds generated by the city, jointly by agreement with
-....,, the Klug Development and Broadmoore Homes, Inc. The County of orange has no
financial investment or other rights in these facilities. we did construct
certain p~rtions of the mains to the design criteria of the adopted Master Plan of
Sanitation District No. 7. . .
This is int~n~ed at some future date to allow the
city to "sell" these sections to District 7 at the city's option. The District
has no vested rights in these sewers.-
i/VF:bm c 1-r-Y bF
DISTRICT NO. 1
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 2
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 3
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 5
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 6
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 7
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 11
Di n'ctors present:
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
.~
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
March 10, 1976 -7:30 p.m.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
ROLL CALL
Kerm Rima (Chairman), Robert Battin,.
John Garthe, and James Sharp
None
Michael Callahan (Chairman), Dale Chaput,
Ralph Clark, Vernon Evans, Miriam Kaywood,
Donald Fox, Don Smith, Bob Perry, George
Scott, Donald Winn, Frances Wood, and
Robin Young
None
Phillip Cox (Chairman), Edward Byrne,
Norman Culver, Jesse Davis, Vernon Evans,
Donald Fox, Beth Graham, Miriam Kaywood,
Alice MacLain, Thomas McKnew, Richard Olson,
Laurence Schmit, Norma Gibbs, Bernie Svalstad,
Frances Wood, and Gilbert Arbiso
None
Don Mcinnis (Chairman), Thomas Riley,
and Howard Rogers
None
John Store (Chairman), Robert Battin,
and Kerm Rima
None
John Garthe (Chairman), John Burton,
Ralph Clark, Mil~n Dostal, Francis
Glockner, Don Smith, and Donald Saltarelli
None
Laurence Schmit (Ch~1 i rnwn), llcnry Oukc,
and Norma Cibbs
3/10/76
STAFF ·MEMBERS PRESENT:
.•
OTHERS PRESENT:
Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne
Sylvester, Secreta~y, William Clarke,
, Bruce Taylor, Rita Brown, and Hilary
Eitzen
'.
·Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel,
Conrad Hohener, Harvey Hunt, Milo Keith;
Gail Lynch, Donald Martinson, Donald .
Stevens, Bill Hartge, Lloyd Coffelt, ·
Ralph Shook·, Jess Perez, Peggy McElligott·, .:·
George Rach, and Lowell Kavenge
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and li of Orange County, California, was held at 7:30 p.m.
Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation, the roll was tailed and the
Secretary reported a quorum present for each District' .s·· Board.
* * * * * * * * ~ * *
Moved, seconded, and duly carried: DISTRICTS 1,2,3 & 7
Excerpts re Board
Appointment That the minute excerpts from the Cities
of Fountain Valley, Orange and Tustin,
dated March 10, 1976, be received and ordered filed; and that the following
representatives be seated as members of the Boards:
City
Fountain Valley
Orange
Tustin
DISTRICT 1
AEEroval of minutes
held February 11,
DISTRICT 2
~proval of minutes
held February 11,
DISTRICT 3
AEEroval of minutes
held February 11,
DISTRICT 5
Approval of minutes
District Active Alternate
2 George Scott Al Holl.inden
3 Bernie.Svalstad Al Hollinden
2 & 7 Don E. Smith Robert D. Hoyt
1 James B. Sharp Richard Edgar
7 Donald Saltarelli Richard Edgar
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the minutes of the regular meeting
1976 be approved as mailed.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the minutes of the regular meeting
1976 be approved as mailed.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the minutes of the regular meeting
1976 be approved as mailed.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the minutes of the regular meeting
held February 11, 1976, and the minutes of the special meeting held March 3,
1976, be approved as mailed.
-2-
i •
~
..
3/10/76
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
.That the minutes of the regular meeting·
held February 11; 1976 be approved as·mailed.
'.
DISTRICT 'NO. 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular meeting
held February 11, 1976. be ·approved as mailed.
DISTRICT NO. 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular meeting
held February 11, 1976 ·be approved as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the
Joint Chairman
The Joint Chairman reported that the
first meeting of the Committee of
Locally Elected Officials representing
TRI-TAC agencies had been held in
Sacramento with Win Adams, Chairman of the State Water Resources Control
Board. Also in attendance were managers of the agencies represented on
the Committee by locally elected officials. A survey is being compiled
regarding the areas in which the Committee might be most effective to
enable a final determination of the Committee's goals and objectives.
It was the concensus of those in attendance that communication at the
State level between local agencies and the State Board is very good and
that perhaps the Committee's efforts should be directed toward the Federal
level.
The Joint Chairman then called an Executive Committee meeting for Tuesday,
March 30th at S:~O p.m. and invited Directors Culver and Svalstad to
attend and participate. He announced that the Building Committee would
be meeting at the same time and also invited them to attend the Executive
Committee meeting.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the
General Manager
The General Manager reiterated the con-
sensus of the Committee of Locally
Elected Officials that there exists a
real need to develop a close liason with
the California congressional delegation in order that our voice may be
heard in Washington as a united effort of California State and local
agencies.
Mr. Harper briefly reviewed the progress of the JPL-ACTS Pilot Project
and advised that it is scheduled for start-up during the next month.
The General Manager reported that the State has certified step two grant
eligibility on the first incremental unit of secondary treatment at Plant
2 (75 MGD Activated Sludge Plant) which will allow the Districts to
proceed with the design phase. The staff has solicited proposals from
several engineering firms in accordance with the recently adopted pro-
cedures, and a recommendation will he forthcoming at the April meeting of
the Joint Boards.
-3-
. 1
3/10/76
. r
M~. Harper also advised that he had beeh invited by the Environmental
Protection Agency, at their expense, to participate in a symposium on
wastewater treatment in Russia, tentatively· scheduled for two weeks in
·July, and w~th the Boards' permission would plan to attend.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the
General Counsel
The 'General Counsel reported briefly
wit~ respect to right.of way acqu1s1tion
in connccti6n'with construction of the '
Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, which
will apparently be obtained without riecessity ot condemnati6n actiori.
ALL DISTRICTS
Certification of the
General Manager received
and ordered filed
Moved~ second~d, and duly carried:
That the certification of the General
Manager that he has checked all bills.
appearing on the agenda, found them to
be in order, and that he
and ordered filed.
recommends ,,authori za ti on for payment, be received
ALL DISTRICTS
Approval of Joint Operating
and Capital Outlay Revolving
Fund check registers
Moved, s~conded, and duly carried:
That th~ Districts' Joint Operating and
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund accounts
payable check registers be approved for
signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and that the County Auditor'
be authorized and directed ~o pay:
Joint Operating
Capital Outlay Revolving
$ 146,549.63
l,409,981.28
$1,556,530.91
in accordance with the claims listed on Pages "I-1" through "I-4", attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of
check registers That the District's Operating Fund and
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund accounts
payable check registers be approved for signature of the Chairman, and
that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay:
Operating Fund $ 73.32
Facilities Revolving Fund 918,315.76
$918,389.08
in accordance with the claims listed on Page ''Il-1", attached hereto and
made a part of these minutes.
-4-
3/10/76
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of
check registers That the District's Operating Fund and
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund accounts
payable check registers be approved for signature of the Chairman, and
that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay:
Operating Fund $ 17.50
Facilities Revolving Fund 655 '801.14
$655,818.64
in accordance with the claims listed on Page "II-1", attached hereto and
made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of
check register That the District's Operating Fund
accounts payable check register be
approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be
authorized and directed to pay $524.75, in accordance with the claims
listed on Page "Il-2", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of
check registers That the District's Operating Fund and
Facilities Revolving Fund accounts
payable check registers be approved for signature of the Chairman, and
that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay:
Operating Fund $ 524.50
Facilities Revolving Fund 119,806.27
$120,330.77
in accordance with the claims listed on Page "III", attached hereto and
made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of
check register That the District's Accumulated Capital
Outlay Fund accounts payable check
register be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County
Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $10,627.25, in accordance with
the claims listed on Page "III", attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file letter
from City of Huntington
Beach re Job No. P2-8-8
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the letter from the City of Huntington
Beach, dated February 18, 1976, relative
to inclusion of certain street improvements
in the contract for Brookhurst Street Improvements, Job No. P2-8-8, for
which the City will reimburse the Districts, be received and ordered filc<l.
-5-
3/10/76
' t
ALL DISTRICTS ·Moved,' seconded,, and dul.y carried:
.Making a Negative Declaration ·~
and approving plans and That the Boards of Directors adopt
specifications for Job No. Resolution No. ·76-41, making a' Negative
P2-8-8 Declar~tion and providing for noiicc
theteof; and approving plans and.speci-
.. fications for Brookhurst Stre~t Improvements, Job No. ·p2-8-8, and
authorizing advertising for bids to be received on April .6-, 1976; said
specification and proposal documents to provide· separate bid items for
impiovements to be performed on behalf of the City of.Huntington Bcrich
· and reimbursed to the Districts by .the City.. Certified c:opy of this
resolution is attached he1eto and made a part cif these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Awarding contract for New
Water Well No. 1 at Plant
No. 1, Job No. PW-049
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-42, to receive and
file bid tabulation and recommendation,
·and awarding contract for New Water Well No. 1 at Plant No. 1, Job No.
PW-049, to Mccalla Bros., in the amount of $42,046.00. Certified copy
of this resolution. is attached he~eto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving Change Order No. 1
to the plans and specifications
for Job No. PW-050
Followi~g a clarification of the reason
for the proposed reduction of insurance
requirements for Job No. PW-050, it was•
moved, seconded, and duly carried~
That Change Order No. 1 to th~ plans and specifications for Installation
of. Foul Air Treatment at Plant No. 2, Headworks "C", Job No. PW-050,
authorizing a reduction in the insurance coverage requirements for the
contract with Skippei & Company, be approved. -Copy of this change order
is attached hereto and made·a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing the Joint Chairman
and seven employees to attend
the 48th Annual Conference of
the CWPCA at Lake Tahoe; and
authorizing reimbursement of
expenses
Following a brief discussion concerning
the request for authorization to attend
the 48th Annual CWPCA Conference, and the
anticipated cost associated therewith, it
was moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Joint Chairman and seven staff
employees be authorized to attend the
48th Annual Conference of the California Water Pollution Control Associa-
tion to be held April 14-16, 1976, at Lake Tahoe; and,
FURTHER MOVED: Tirnt reimbursement for travel, lodging, meals and incidental
expenses incurred in connection with attendance at said conference, be
authorized.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file letter from
IRWD re alternate connection
points to the Districts'
outfall system
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the letter from Irvine Ranch Water
District, dated March 4, 1976, relative
to alternate connection points to the
Sanitation Districts' outfall system, and
costs associated therewith, pursuant to the agreement between the respective
parties dated .fanuary 12, 1971, be rccejvc<l an<l ordered filed.
-6-
ALL DISTRICTS
.Authorizing the General Manager
to engage John Carollo Engineers
to prepare a report relative to
IRWD's request re alternate
connection points to the
Districts' outfali system
costs of said study and report
District.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file financial
report of Director of
Finance for quarter ending
December 31, 1975
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file letter from
Guaranty Chevrolet withdrawing
3/10/76
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the General Manager be authorized
to engage John Carollo Engineers to
prepare a report relative to Irvine Ranch
Water District's request for information
relative to alternate connection points
to the Distri~ts' out~all system, all ·
to be borne by the Irvine Ranch Water
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the financial report of the Director
of Finance for the quarter ending December
31, 1975, be received and ordered filed.
Foflowing a brief report, it was moved,
seconded, and duly carried:
bid on Specification No. A-080 That the letter from Guaranty Chevrolet
dated February 19, 1976, withdrawing
their bid on Specification No .. A-080 due-to an error thereon, be received
and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Rejecting all bids received
December 2, 1975, re
Specification No. A-080
ALL DISTRICTS
Awarding purchase of Six (6)
1/2 Ton Pickup Trucks,
Specification No. A-080 Rebid
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That all bids received en December 2,
1975, for Six (6) 1/2 Ton Pickup Trucks,
Specification No. A-080, be rejected.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the bid tabulation and recommendation
for purchase of Six (6) 1/2 Ton Pickup
Trucks, Specification No. A-080 Rebid, be
received and ordered filed, and that award of said purchase to Santa Ana
Dodge in the amount of $26,076.00, be authorized.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and unanimously carried:
Reading proposed Ordinance
No. 509 by title only That Ordinance No. 509, an Ordinance
Amending Ordinance No. 505, as amended,
and Ordinance No. 508, Pertaining to Connection Charges, be read by
title only, and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived.
DISTRICT 5
Adopting Ordinance No. 509
by the following roll call vote:
There being no further written or oral
comments on proposed Ordinance No. 509,
it was moved, seconded, and duly carried
AYES: Directors Don Mcinnis, Thomas Riley, and Howard Rogers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
-7-
3/10/76
• t
Th~t the Board of Directors adopt Ordinance No. 509 an Ordinance Amending
Ordinance.No. 505, as amended, and Ordinan~e No. 508, Pertaining to
Connection Charges.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, ~econded, and duly carried~
Adjournment . . Tirnt this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation Distri~t No .. s b~ adjouine4. The.Ch~irma~·
then. declared the meeting so adjourne~ at 8:06 p.m., March 10, .1976.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 3
.to the plans and specifications That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and
for £ontract No. 2-14-4 specifications for Santa Ana River Inter-
.. ceptor Sewer, Reach 5 ,. Contract No.
2-14-4, authorizing a change in the type of concrete pipe, at no cost to
the District, be approved .. Copy of this change order is attached hereto
and mad~ a part of these m{nutes.
DISTRICT 2
Authorizing execution of Pipe-
Line License agreement with The
ATSF Railway Company, re
Contract No. 2-14-3
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-43-2, approving and
authorizing execution of Pipe-Line
License agreement ~ith The Atchison,
Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company in conn.ection with construction of
the Santa Ana River Interceptor Connector, Reaches 2, 3 and 4, Contract.
No. 2-14-3; and authorizing payment in the amount of $150:00 for said
license. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made
a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2
Authorizing execution of Pipe-
Line License agreement with The
ATSF Railway Company, re
Contract No. 2-14-5
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-44-2, approving and
authorizing execution of Pipe-Line
License agreement with The Atchison,
Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company in connection with construction of
the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Reaches 6, 7 and 8, Contract
No. 2-14-5; and authorizing payment in the amount of $150.00 for said
license. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made
a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2
Authorizing issuance of a
change order to the emergency
purchase order contract with
F. B. Copk Corp. re Newhope-
Placentia Trunk Sewer
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That issuance of a change order to the
emergency purchase order contract with
F. B. Cook Corporation for additional
work in the amount of $909.88, relative
to reshaping of manhole in connection
with repairs at the intersection of State College Boulevard and Orangc-
thorpe (Newhopc-Placentia Trunk Sewer), be authorized.
-8-
DISTRICT 2
Receive and file request from
C. Michael, Inc. for anncxa-
. tion to the District, and
refer to staff for study and
· recommendation
recommendation.
DISTRICT 2
Reconsideration of Directors'
compensation policy and affir-
mation of Resolution No. 76-12-2,
establishing new policy re
Directors' compensation
3/10/76
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the request from C. Michael, Inc. for
annexation of approximately 295.87 acres of
territory to the District northerly of the
Yorba Regional Park, be received, ordered
filed, and referred to staff for study and
Chairman Callahan distributed copies of
the General Counsel's opinion relative to
reconsideration of Resolution No. 76-12-2,
establishing compensation and expense reim-
bursement policies for Directors, which was
adopted by the Board at the regular meeting
on February 11th. The opinion was in
response to the written request of Director Chaput that said resolution be
reconsidered. After a brief review of the Counsel's opinion, it was moved,
seconded, and duly carried:
That the letter dated March 3, 1976 from Director Dale Chaput requesting
reconsideration of Resolution No. 76-12-2, and the General Counsel's opinion
dated March 10th relative to reconsideration of said resolution, be received
and ordered filed.
Approving motion to reconsider
Resolution No. 76-12-2
Following further comments by the General
Counsel that a motion to reconsider
Resolution No. 76-12-2 would be appropriate
under the Districts' procedural rules, it was moved by Director
Callahan and duly seconded:
That the Board of Directors reconsider Resolution No. 76-12-2,
establishing compensation and expense reimbursement policies for its
Directors, and repealing Resolution No. 73-45-2. Following a roll
call vote, the General Counsel reported that the motion to reconsider
had carried by virtue of seven Directors voting in favor thereof, and
five Directors voting against said resolution.
Readoption of Resolution No.
76-12-2, establishing new
policy re Directors' compen-
sation
It was then moved and seconded that the Board
of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-12-2,
establishing compensation and expense reim-
bursement policies for its Directors, and
repealing Resolution No. 73-45-2.
DISTRICT 2
Following further discussion relative to certain compensation and
expense reimbursement provisions of the resolution, the question was
called for and said resolution was duly adopted by roll call vote,
eight Directors voting in favor thereof, and four Directors voting
against adoption of said resolution.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Referring request of Garden
Grove Sanitary District re
waiver of sewer connection
fees to Exccut i vc Conuni t tee
That the letter from Garden Grove Sanitary
District, dated March 9, 1976, relative to
possible waiver of sewer connection fees,
he recei vcd, ordered fi 1 cd, anll re fr rred
to the Executive Committee for review and report back to the Bo:ir<l.
-9-
3/10/76
DISTRICT 2
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
, Tilat this meeting of-the Board of
Directors of County Sanitat~on District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the.meeting.so adjourned at 8:24 p.m., March 10, 1976.
DISTRICT 3
Authorizing execution of
agreement with Southern
Pacific Transportation Co.
re Contract No. 3-21-2
Moved, seconded, ~~~ duli carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution N9. 76-45-3, approving and
authorizing execution of agreement with
Southern Pacific Transportation Company
for right of way in connection with tonstruction of the Westside Relief
Interceptor, Portion of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 and 29, Contract No.
3-21-2, at no cost to the District. Certified copy of this:resolution
is attached hereto and made a part of these minute~. _
DISTRICT 3
Receive and file Summons and
First Amended Complaint for
Damages for Personal Injuries,
Darryl Nasser vs. Radna Balstad,
et al., re Contract No. 3-21-2,
and refer to General Counsel and
liabi(lty insurance carrier
'
Moved~ seconded, and duly carried:
That the Summons and First Amended
Complaint for Damages for Personal
Injuries, in Case No. 239335, Darryl
Nasser vs. Radna Balstad, et al., in
connection with construction of the
Westside Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25,
26 and Portion of 27, Contract No.
3-21-1, be received and ordered filed, and referred to the District's
General Counsel and liability insurance carrier for appropriate action.
DISTRICTS 3 & 11
Awarding contract for Manhole
Replacement and Repair,
Contract No. 11-lR-1
Following a brief report by the Super-
intendent with regard to the nature of
the work to be performed under Contract
No. 11-lR-1, it was moved, seconded, and
duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-46, to receive and
file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Manhole
Replacement and Repair, Contract No. 11-lR-1, to Rewes-Schock, in the
amount of $37,253.00. Certified copy of this resolution is attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 3
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:24 p.m., March 10, 1976.
DISTRICT 11
Approving Change Order No. 1
to the plans and specifications
for Contract No. 11-4 R
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
specifications to Remodel NewLmd-Ham:i 1 ton
Pumping Station Pacilitics, Contract No.
11-4R, authorizing an addition of $1,214.95 to the contract with Clifford
L. Thompson Construction Comp~rny for additional block wall and excavation
~rnd grading, and granting a time extension of 30 calendar days to ~1ccomp-
l i sh said work, be approved. Copy of this change order is attached hereto
and made a part of these minutes.
-10-
DISTRICT 11
Adjournment
3/10/76
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:24 p.m., March 10, 1976.
DISTRICT 6
Approving uniform Directors'
mileage expe~se reimbursement
policy
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-51-6, amending
Resolution No. 73-52-6 to provide for
uniform Directors' mileage expense reimbursement for each District of the
Joint Administrative Organization. Certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 6
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:27 p.m.
DISTRICT 1
Referring letter from City
of Santa Ana re Raitt Street
Trunk Sewer to staff
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the letter from the City of Santa
Ana dated February 23, 1976, relative to
construction of the Raitt Street Trunk
Sewer northerly of Sunflower Avenue, be received, ordered filed and
referred to staff.
DISTRICT 1
Establishing new policy re
Directors' compensation
Following a brief discussion, it was
moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-11-1, establishing the compensation and expense reim-
bursement policies for its Directors, and repealing Resolutions Nos.
63-128 and 68-3-1. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto
and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 1
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m., March 10, 1976.
DISTRICT 7
Authorizing acceptance of
Director's Deed from
Cal Trans, re Contract No.
7-1
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-47-7, authorizing
acceptance of Director's Deed from the
State of California, Department of
Transportation, for acqu1s1t1on of excess property adjacent to the San
Diego Freeway and abutting the District's casement for the Gisler-Red
Hill Trunk SL'\vCr, Contr:H.::t No. 7-1, :it no cost to the Distr:ict. Certi-
fied copy of this resolution .is attach("c.l hereto :ind m:1dc a part of th("se
minutes.
-11-
3/10/76
DISTRICT 7
Authorizing execution of an
agreement with Southern Pacific
Transportation Company re.
Contract No. 7-6-7
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
'Resolution No. 76-48-7, approving and
. authorizing execution of agreement with
. ·Southern Pacific Transportation Company ,
for right of way in connection with construction of the Tustin-Orange
Trunk Sewer, Reach 11 and Portion of Reach 12, Contract No. 7-6-7; and
authorizing payments in the amounts of $40,000.00. for permanent right o'f.
way and $3,086.25 for ·temporary right of way. Certified copy of this
resolution is attached hereto ~nd made a part.of these minut~s.
DISTRICT 7
Authorizing initiation of
proceedings re Proposed
Annexation No. 48
Moved, seconded, and d~ly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Standard Resolution _No. 76~49-7,
authorizing initiation of proceedings
to annex approximately 6.647 acres of territory to the District in tl1e
vicinity of Overhill and Miravista Drive (Proposed Annexation No.· 48.-.
Tract No. 5369 to County Sanitation District No. 7) .. Certified copy of
this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7
Receive and file request from
Donald Cray for annexation of
territory to the District; and
authorizing initiation of
proceedings re Proposed
A.nnexation No. 53
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the request from Donald Cray for
annexation of approximately one acre of
territory to the District in the vicinity
of Santiago Canyon Road and Amapola
Avem~ie, be received and orde:red filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No.
76-50-7, authoriiing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory
(Proposed Annexation No. 53 -Cray Annexation to County Sanitation District
No. 7). Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 It was moved and seconded that Resolution
Amending annexation policy No. 76-39-7, amending Resolution No.
75-44-7 establishing annexation policy
re computation of annexation acreage fee, be adopted.
Director Smi'th then requested that Councilman Perez of the City of Orange
be heard regarding. the proposed resolution and the request of Orange Park
Association for annexation to the District. Councilman Perez submitted
the following statements :rnd requested tlwt they be recorded in the minutes
of the meeting, fol lowing \vhich both he and Director Smith stated that the
Orange Park Acres s~nitary sewer system should be provided by the City of
Orange and reiterated the City's objection to the area's annexation to the
District, as proposed:
Annexation to Sanitation District #7 requires election (simple
majority) and payment of annex3t_ion fees $8"28.00 per acre .
. Genera] Obligation Bond Issue passage for payment of Annexation
FC'cs only i~ not feasi.hJe.
-12-
3/10/76
General Obligation Bond Issue as proposed in the amount o.f
$1,140,000 requires a 2/3 majority.
Proposed Bond Issue does not provide any local sewers.
The statement by the proponents ·of this Annexation and Bond Issue
relative to "the District's policy of providing trunk sewers
within one-quarter mile of all properties 11 is not' a guaranteed
right of all properties within the District.
Annexation to Sani'tation· District #7 and passage of .the proposed
.Bond Issue would impose a tax rate of $2.6954 per $100/A.V. but
would not provide any local sewer system.or physical connections
to the trunk sewer system.
·Annexation with complete sewer system would cost approximately
$2,292,000 and would result in a tax rate of approximately $4.40!/
100 A.V.
At the present time Orange County Sanitation District #7 has no
vested rights in those·portions of Reaches 17 and 18 constructed
by the City of Orange.
The proposed Improvement District is entirely within the official
sphere of influence of the City of Orange as adopted by the Orange
County L.A.F.C.O.
The proposed. annexation fee of $828. 00 per acre will-be inequitable
to those that have paid the current annexation fee of $1,029.00 per
acre, unless appropriate refunds are made.
Status of Tus~in-Orange Trunk Sewer
Trunk sewers are presently completed to Fairhaven and the Flood
Control Channel at Esplanade. (Reach 12)
Design of Reaches 13 thru 16 of the trunk sewer from Fairhaven and
Esplanade to Santiago Canyon Road and Linda Vista is now complete.
The District Engineer will present the plans to the Board for
approval 2/11/76 and ask for authorization to advertise for bids.
This would accomplish the completion of the trunk system to meet
the downstream end of the trunk sewer the City built in conjunction
with Klug Development by some time this fall.
The City of Orange and the developers, Klug Development and Broadmoor
Homes, Inc. have constructed two sections of the "Master Planned"
trunk sewer. The first section extends from Santiago Canyon Road
and Linda Vista to the intersection of Orange Park Blvd. and Frank
St. The second section extends from a point approximately 400'
south of Meads Ave. and Handy Creek, along Handy Creek to a point
approximately 725' south of Amapolla. From the upstream end of
the first section at Orange Park Blvd. and Frank St. to the down
stream end of the second section, a local 12" sewer has been
constructed to connect the two sections of master planned trunk
sewer main. During the design period of the first section we con-
sidered building it along Handy Creek from Santiago Canyon Road,
-13-
3/10/76
south-eastward, however, the proposed alignment traversed an
extensiv~ multiplicity of ownerhsips which would have required
a considerable period of time just to acquire the necessary right
of way. We, therefore, constructed it within existing road rights
of way except at the southwest corner of Santiago Canyon Road and
Orangc'Park Blvd. and ended it at Orange Park Blvd. and Frank St.
TI1C local 12" sewer main which we constructed from this point to
the beginning of the second reach was also built primarily within
existing road rights of way. The capacity of this 12" main is
equal to approximately 40go of the trunk sewer. This will allow
a considerable portion of the contributary area upstream of this
section to be served before it becomes necessary to construct
the parallel section of the trunk sewer.
All of these s.ewer mains belong to the City of Orange. They were
built by the City with sewer construction funds generated by the
City, jointly by agreement with the Klug Development and Broadmoore
Homes, Inc. The County of Orange has no financial investment or
other rights in these facilities. We did construct certain
portions of the mains to the design criteria of the adopted Master
Plan of Sanitation District No. 7. This is intended at some
future date to allow the city to "sell" these sections to District
7 at the City's option. The District has no vested rights in
these sewers.
At the request of the Board, the staff then reviewed the uniform annexation
policy of the several Districts which provides for computation of fees
based upon the net worth of the District divided by the acreage of the
respective District. District No. 7, however, is in a unique position
inasmuch as it is the only District with non-master plan local sewers
constructed under assessment district proceedings and recorded as
assets in its books of account. These facilities are actually maintained
by sewer maintenance districts and must be repaired and/or replaced by
said maintenance districts. The staff has therefore recommended that the
local sewers be deleted from net equity in determining the annex:!: ion
acreage fee of District No. 7.
The staff further reported that no annexations have been conclu1.l., :\t the
current acreage fee which includes the value of local sewers j n : '.1·. compu-
tation. However, one annexation is in process for which a deposit has
been made, which said deposit is presently being held in trust pending a
determination by the Board relative to its annexation policy.
Following further discussion, the question was called for and Resolution
No. 76-39-7, runending Resolution No. 75-44-7, establishing annexation
acreage fee, was duly adopted by roll call vote. Certified copy of this
resol~tion is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7
Receive 3n<l file legal opinion
of the Ccncral Counsel re
Orange Park Acres annex.at.ion
to the histr.ict
llll'nt district solely to p~1y the
o i·dc red fi 1 ed.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the legal opinion of the District's
Gcncr~1 l Counsc1 re· lat i ve to the request of
the proponents of ~mncxation of the Or~rnge
P:1 rk Acres :nca to cs ta h l ish an imp rovc-
ll is t ri ct anncx:1 t ion f ccs, be l'l'Cc i \'Cd :rnJ
-14-
t ••
DISTRICT 7
·Receive and file letter from
Peggy L. McElligott re
Proposal for Concurrent
Annexation and.Bond Authori-
zation -Orange Park Acres
received and ordered filed.
DISTRICT 7
Authorizing initiation of
proceedings re Orange Park Acres
annexation to the District
3/lQ/76
. t
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the letter from Peggy L. ~cElligott,
Attorney for Orange Park Association,
datcp January 28, 1976, regarding Proposal
for Concurrent Annexation and Bond
A:uthorization ,-Orange Park Acres, be ·~
Following a brief discussion regarding
the· General Counsel's memorandum relative
to the request of Orange Park Association
for annexation of territory to the
Disrrict, it was moved and seconded that
the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-53-7, authorizing initiation
of proceedings to annex the Orange Park Acres area to District No. 7.
The Board then entered into a lengthy discussion concerning the request
of Orange Park Association for concurrent annexation and bond authoriza-
tion. The maker of the motion stated that the proposed annexation should
be considered by the District Board solely on the merits of providing
sewerage service to the area and that any consideration of the propriety
of also annexing the territory· to the City of Orange should be the deter-
mination of the Local Agency Formation Commission. Furthermore, the
proposal of Orange Park Association for concurrent annexation and bond
authorization would require a two-thirds m~jority vote of the affected
residents.
The Director representing the City of Orange requested that the City's
position previously set f~rth under the preceding agenda item be considered
in connection with the prop~sed annexation of the Orange Park Acres area.
The Board then entered into a further discussion regarding the most cost-
effective method of providing sewerage service for the territory in
question, following which the Chair recognized Peggy McElligott, attorney
for the proponents of the annexation, who spoke in favor of the proposal
and urged approval by the Board.
After further discussion, the question was called for and Resolution No.
76-53-7, authorizing initiation of annexation proceedings for the Orange
Park Acres area, was duly adopted by roll call vote. Certified copy of
this resolution is attached hereto and made a part qf these minutes.
DISTRICT 7
Approving uniform Directors'
mileage expense reimbursement
policy
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-52-7, amending
Resolution No. 73-53-7 to provide for
uniform Directors' mileage expense reimbursement for each District of
the Joint Administrative Orgnnization. Certified copy of this resolution
is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
-15-
3/10/76
DISTRICT 7-Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Consideration of policy
re Directors' Compensation That the staff prepare a resolution for
the Boards' consideration at the regular
April meeting relative to a change in Directors' compensation policy
identical to that previously adopted by Districts 1, 2, 3 and 11.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, an~ duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman
the declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:18 p.rn., March 10, 1976.
-1 {)-
WARRANT NO.
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN·FAVOR OF
·289·05
. 28906
~907. ~8908
·28909
28910
28911
28912
. 28913
. . 28914
... 28915
~8916
. 28917
28918
28919
28920
28921
28922
28923
28924
28925
28926
28927
28928
28929
28930
28931
28932.
28933
28934
28935
28936 .
28937
---28938
.28939
l 289~0
28941
28942
l 1{2894 3
28944
28945
28946
28947
28948
I 2894"9
. 28950
28951
, . 28952
28953
28954
28955
8956 ~8957
28958
.A & S Building Maintenance Co., J~riitorial Service
ALZ Industrial Pump Division, Pump Repair
Acme Canvas Products, Test Materi~ls
Air California, Air Fare, Various Meetings
Airdraulic, Pump Parts .
Air Seals Corporation, Engine Parts
All Bearing Service, Inc.; Bearings, Hose & Co_uplings · ·
Allied ·supply Company, Valves &.Pipe S~pplies .
Almquist Tool & Equipment, Hardware · · .. ·
American Compressor Company, Co~pressor Parts
American Controls, Valves·
American Cyanamid Company; Chemicals .·
. City.of Anaheim, Power·. · ~. .
Anaheim Sewer Construction, Lateral Repair
· The Anchor Packing Co., Pump Packing
-~. B. Anderson Co., Tools
Anixter Purzan, Hardware
N. T. Bailey, JPL Lockers ~
Bank of America, Bond &' Coupon Collection
Banning Battery Company~ Batteries ·
Beckman Instruments, Controls
John G. Bell Co., Barscreen Parts
Better Rents, Equipment Rental .
Black & Decker Mfg. Co., Equipment Parts
Blower Paper Company, Tape
Boyle Engineering Corp., Plant 2 Facilities·Plan
Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment exams
CS Company, Valves & Pump Parts .·
CWPCA, Safety Seminar Registration
Cadillac Plastic & Chemical Co., Plexiglas
Cal-State Seal Company, Gasket Material: .
Cal's Cameras, ·Photo Processing & Supplies
··Calif. Association of Sanitary Agencies, Workshop
Registration
California Collator Sales, Specification Supplies
Carmenita Ford Truck Sales, Inc., Truck Parts
R. L. Carson, Employee Mileage
R. B. Clapp Co., Inc., Controls
Clark Dye Hardware, Tools
Coast Nut & Bolt ·Co., Steel & Hardware
College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials
Consolidated Electrical Distbrs., Electric Supplies
Continental Chemical Co., Chlorine
Control Specialists, Inc., Regulator Parts
C. W. Corum, Lateral Repair
Leelon L. Cory, Employee Mileage
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
Costa Mesa County Water District, Water
County Wholesale Electric, Electric Supplies
Crane Veyor Corporation, Digester Repair
Charles P. Crowley Co., Freight
Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplies
Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies
Daniels Tire Service, Truck Tires
C. R. Davis Supply Co., Pipe Supplies & Hose
"I-1"
. t • AMOUNT
366.00
806.00
. . 12. 50
160.70
l.!4.75
36.95
526.97
.:i,324.49
10. 97 .
.. 213 .80
415.13
9,~41.-64 .· ·228. 92
. 450.00
380.31
109.48
215. 25·
127.20
4LJ.6. 30
408.73
204.43
379.88
27. 4o.
15.00
·169. 43
8,.500.00
13.00
874.54
97. 50.
"73. 61
64.08
.288..42
200.00
170.40
36.38
11.40
778.76
33.92
110.31
77.17
702.72
3,097.10
341. 94
400.00
5.25
580.37 6.oo
149.20
2,500.00
10.35
40.00
178.76
169.39
1,030.04
WARRANT NO. · IN FAVOR OF
. 28959
28960
. 28961
28962
28.963 .
28964
28965
28966
2t$967
28968
28969
.28970
28971
28972
28.973
28974.
28975
28976
28977
28978
·. 28979
28980
28981
28982
28983
28984
28985
28986
28987 28988 .
28989
28990
28991
28992 .
28993
' 28994
28995 ,. "'28996
.· .. 28997
28998
. 28999
29000
29001
29002
29003
29004
29005
29006
29007
29008
29009
29010
29011
29012
29013
29014
. '
Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling ~ $r
Diamond-Newport Ice Co., Sampling Supplies
Eastman, Inc., Office .Supplies & Printing
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Services .
Fibre Glass Evercoat Co., Inc., Freight
Fischer & Porter Company, Instrument Supplies & Charts·
Fluid Tech; Regulator
City of Fountain Valley, Water .
Compressor Products Division, Compressor Repair
City of Fullertnn, Water . ,
General Electric Supply, Electric Supplies
General Telephone Company
Cindy Geter, Employee Mil~age
Goldenwest Fertilizer Co., Grit. Removal
Goodyear Tire Center, Truck Tires ·
M. E. Gray Co., Valves & Hardware
Graybar Electric Company, Electric Supplies
Hanson's Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies
Charles G. Hardy, Inc., Hardware
Harrington Industrial Plastics,-Pipe Supplies
Michael. Heinz, Employee Mileage
Hennig, Inc., Truck Repair
Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease
Hilti Fastening Systems, Hardware
Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires
Honeywell, Inc., Strip Charts
Hopper Service Parts Co., Truck Parts
Howard Supply Company, Hardware, Tools & Pipe Supplies
City of Huntington Beach, Water
IDS Corporation, Off ice Supplies
Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Freight.
International Harvester Co., Truck Parts
Irvine Ranch Watei·District, Water
J & M Service, Equipment. Parts
Jensen Instrument Company, Controls
Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supplies
King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, V-Belts & Pump Parts
Kirst Pump & Ma.chine Works, Pump Parts
Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies
Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware
Lo Ao Dodge Construction News, Legal Notice P2-23
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tools & Tool Repair
L & N Uniforms Supply Co., Uniform Service
The Lacal Company, Inc., Pump Packing
Lakewood Pipe Service, Freight
Larsen-Hogue Electric, Electric Supplies
Lawson Products, Inc., Hardware
Lewco Electric Company, Truck Repair
McCoy Ford Tractor, Equipment & Tractor Parts
McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Tools, Gauges & Hardware
Master Blueprint & Supply, Blueprints & Printing
Morgan Equipment Company, Equipment Parts
Motorola, Inc., Communication Equipment
Nalco Chemical Company_, Chemj_cals
National Chemsearch, Solvent & Cleaner
National Lumber Supply, Building Materials
"l-2"
AMOUNT
. 295. 00
15.90
703.95
3,000.c
.. 12.57
478.87
291.67
40.00
70.00
6.08
2, 985.41-'
1,876.. 91
. 4 3~ 26
l,296.-00 ··.
. 182.32
J.tl~8. 67
38.03
57. 20.
109.56 1ns. 55
4.20.
175.51
743.51
169.60
357.94·
. 58 .12
( 30. 4 3
3,370.98
144.35
224.64
. 8. 50
8.14
1.75
20·.99
68.74
66.11
173.24
584.32
251.38
48.34
330.00
579.53
1,973.29
538.91
17.93
·255.16
47. 24 '
51. 82.
234.92
644. 21 .
46.06.
67.76
198.72
1,280.~ 1,182.~
68.92
WARRANT NO.· IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
29015
2901'6
.· 29017
~9018
. J020. ~9021
29022
29023
2902li
29025
29026
. ·. 29027 ... 29028
. 29029
. 29030
29031
29032
29033
29034
29035
29036
29037
29038
29039
29040
29041
29042
29043
29044
29045 .
29046
29047
29048
·29049 .
29050
.29051
29052
29053
··29054
29055
29056
·29057
29058
29059
29060
29061
29062
"0 29063
29064
. 29065
·. 29066
29067
29068
29069
-J070 ~9071
' .
City of Newport Beach, Water
Nolex Corporation, Reproduction Supplies
·office Equipment Specialists, Equipment·Repair
Orange County Water District, RepJ_enishmer.Lt Tax
Orange Valve & Fitting Co., Hardware .
Overhead Door Company,· Warehouse Doors
Pacific Telephone Company
M. c. Patten Corporation, .Gauges
Petroleum Dynamics, Pump Parts
Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial ~upplie·s
Tom Ponton, Inc., Pump Parts _ .
Printec Corporation, Reproduction Supplies·
Quality Building Supply, ~ilding Materials
•. $ 485.09
1,062.01
58.27
431.20
. . 10. 55
2,045.80
452.12
252.08
li.90
691.99
27 .85'
. . 288.43
533~70 '. 61~ .· 00 Rainbow Disposal Company, 'l'rash Disposal
'1.'he Regj_ster, NPDES Notice, Bid Notice 11-lR-l ·&
The Republic Supply Co~, Pipe Supplies ·
.Richey Electronics, Inc., Electric Supplies
Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts & Pump
Subscription. 171.56
249.37
462.83
4' 840. 20_
Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing
Santa Ana Electric Moto;rs, Electric Motor & Motor Repair
Sargent. Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies
Scientific Products, Lab Supplies
Seal Methods, Inc., Gas~ets
See Optics, Safety Glasses
s. F. Serrantino, Employee Mileage·
Shepherd Machinery Co., Equipment Parts
Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies
John Sigler, Employee Mileage
Signal-Flash Company, Barricade Rental
Southern California Edison Company
South Orange Supply, Pipe Supplies
Southern California Gas Company
Southern California Water Company
Sparkletts Drinking Water Corporation, Bottled Water
Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Standard Oil Company of Calif., Gasoline & Diesel Fuel
Sterling Art & Engineering Supply, Drafting Supplies
Surveyor 1 s Service Company, Tools ·
T-Girl Temporary Employment, Temporary Warehouse Help
Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage & Water Conf. Expense
Co O. Thompson Petroleum Co., Kerosene
Trexler Compressor, Inc., Compressor Parts
Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts
Tustin Water Works, Water
Union Oil Company of Calif., Gasoline
United Parcel Service, Freight-out
United Reprographics, Inc., Industrial Waste Ord. Printing
United States Elevator Corp., Maintenance Agreement
University of Calif., Irvine Regents, JPL Computer Model
Van Waters & Rogers, Chemicals
VWR Scientific, Test Supplies
Varec, Inc., Freight
Wallace & Tiernan, Chlorinator Parts
Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage
John R. Waples, R.S., Odor Consultant
Waste King Universal, Equipment Repair
"l-3"
57.18
348.12
80.75
24.59
103.62
29.68
22. 50·
. 74. 02
494.90
12.75
98.50
47,562.49.
125.45
1,833.12
3.24
· 165·. 57
234.11
4,868.42
51.64
32.35
166$88
102.00
198.78
891.41
966.55
167.09
11.36
32.94
1,618.21
33.00
247 .J.i6
2,599.72
103.10
10.25
437.J~o
43.50
212.90
27.50
WARRANT NO •. . ' IN FAVOR OF
. 29072
·29073
·29074
29075.
29b76
·29077
29078
Western Wholesale Company, Equipment Parts
.Wi'lson Ford Sales, Trucl~ Parts
Th6mas L. Woodruff, General Couns~l
Donald J~ Wright, Employee Mileage
Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Services
Everett H .. York Company, Filters
Zodiac PB:per Company, Pri~ting S_upplies
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
AMOUNT
32.59
189.53
5,101.5('\
.. 27.~
1, 1~57. 95
202.57
52.53
-------------' ..
28877
28878
28879
AnalY,tical Measurements, PH Recorder $· 969.00
. 4, 134. oo·
. 28880
28881
28882
28883
28884
28885
28886
28887
28888
28889
28890
28891
28892
28893
2889'-i
28895
28896
28897
28898
28899
28900
28901
28902
28903
28904
Calgon Corp., Activated Carbon for ACTS
John Carollo Engineers, Engr. S~rv., ACTS~ Fae. Plan &
J-6-1 '
County Sanitation Dist. '2 of L. A., Solfds Management
Daily Pilot, Bid Notice A-080
Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16
Envirotech-Sparling, Carbon Analysis
Elwood H. Fairchild, JPL Consultant
J. B. Gilbert & Associates, Fae. Plan & P2-23 EIR
J. Putnam Henck, Contractor, JPL-ACTS
Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Management Pl-16
Howard Supply Company, Pipe ·
Instrument Specialj_st Com:pany, JPL Programmer
Motorola, Inc., Mobile Radio & Communication Equipment
Olympic Signs, JPL Signs ·.
Pepsi Co. Bldg. Systems, Inc.~ JPL Equipment Rental c. Eo Raymond/Bartlett-Snow, JPL Kiln
The Register, Bid Notice PW-049
Rockwell International, Calculator
Thomas J. Rush, La.the
Sales Engineers Limited, Polymer Tank
Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Incubator
Smith Emery Company, Testing Pl-16
Jack R. Strobel, :MAI, Plant 2 Land Appraisal
Taylor Instruments, JPL Flowmeters
Twining Laboratories, Concrete Test
Up-Right Scaffolds, Scaffolding
Wyle Laboratories, Consultant Pl-16
TOTAL COHF
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF
"I-4"
25,473.48
65, ooo. oo·
9.11
795' 809. }~ 3
9,808.03
276.00
6,708.27
238,862.87
12,484.51
.1,419. 34
720.80
2,483. 63
530.00
.861 .. 86
195,000.00
97.00
213.27
9,795.10
4,629.78
3,191-t.84
5·2. 00
650.00
29,906.40
15.00
3'-l5. 56
532.00
$ 1, 409' 981. 28 ..
$ 1,556,530.91:
tlA'llAANT NO.
DISTRICT NO. 2
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
28854 Precision· /mod~zing, Refund IW Permit Overpayment , . '
ACCillfilLATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS ..
IN FAVOR OF
, .. 28855
28856
28857"
28858
28859
28860
A.T. & S.F. Railroad Company, Santa Ana River Interceptor Payments
. 28861
28862
28863
28864
John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contractor 2-14-3 -
Count;y of Orange, Compaction Testing 2-15 · ·.
J. Putnam .ijenck, A Corporation, Contractor 2-15
Kasler Corp. & L.H. Woods, JV., Contractor 2-14-4
Kraemer IV, Easement 2-17-1 ..
Long Beach Iron Works, Inc., Contractor 2-14-4
Lowry and Associates, Engineering Services 2-15, 2-17-2
Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 2-14-3, 2-14-4, 2-14-5
S.S. Zarubica, Contractor 2-14-5 ·
DISTRICT NO. 3
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
28865 Los Alamitos General Hospital, Refund IW Permit Overpayment
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
' .
28866 Boyle Engineering Corp., Engineering Services 3-20, 3-20-1, 3-21-2
28867 County of Orange, Compaction Testing, 3-20-1, 3-20-2, 3-21-1
28868 Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing, 3-20-1, 3-20-2
28869. Southern California Testing Laboratory, Soils Testing 3-21-1
'.28870 Sully-Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 3-20-1
.28871 A.G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N.M. Saliba Co., Contractor 3-20-2
"II-1"
. ~
$
...
$
AMOUNT
73.32
300.00
30,297.60
80.89
27,740.48
795,447.00
23,750.00
162.18
3,048.00
. 3, 796. 00
'33,693.61
$ 918,315.76
$ 918,389.08
$ 17.50
$ 12,997.00
339.54
962.00
72.00
287,953.60
353,477.00
$ 655' 801.14
$ 655,818.64
DISTRICT NO. 5
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. · IN FAVOR OF
28872 City of·Newport·Beach, Connection Fee Administration
11 11-2"
$
\,,,..l'
AMOUNT
524.75
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. ." IN FAVOR OF
28873
28874
..
. . .
Local Agency Formation Commission, Annexation ff 53 Pro~essing Fee
Shelton & Associates, Right-of-Way.Appraisal
· .
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
28875 Irvine Industrial Complex, Master Plan Reinbursement Agreement
DISTRICT NO. 11
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
28876 Clifford L. Thompson Construction Co .. , Contractor 11-4R
"III"
$.
$
$
AMOUNT
25.00
499.50
524 ."so
119,806.27
$ 120,330.77
$ 10,627.25~