Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-03-10r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAiN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) March 4, 1976 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. lJ 2, 3) SJ 6, 7, & 11 WEDNESDAY) MARCH 10, 1976) 7:30 P.M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY) CALIFORNIA TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962;2411 The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. EXECUTIVE CO\\h'lITTEE -WeJnesJay, Marcl1 31, 1976, S:3fJ p.m. BUILDING COMMITTEE -Wcdnc~day .• ~b1'ch 7>J., 1976, 5:30 p.m. (Tentative) I MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS March 10, 1976 -7:30 p.m. Post Office Box 8 127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Cal!f., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lis ts are not attached to the agenda since they are made up · i mmediately pre ·- ceding the meeting, but will appear in the supplemental agenda available at the meeting. Joint Boards No. 9-a and 9 -b -Approval of Plans and Specifications, Brookhurst Street Improvemertts at Plant No . 2, Contract Nb. P2-8-8. Plans and specifications for the improvement of Brookhurst Street have been prepared in accordance with Huntington Beach's standards for this improvement. This regularly-budgeted proj e ct includ es approximately 4600 linear feet of curb and gutter in con- junction with pavement widening of approximately 26 feet . Th e staff has coordinated this project with the City's staff and the contract will include certain items of work to be paid by the City of Hunting ton Beach. The City's responsibilities include catch basins, storm drains, street lights and a 5-foot sidewalk. Also inc l uded in this contrac t is pavement removal and replacement at the Pl a nt No. 2 entran ce . This pavement has sustained repeated failures and is included in this project to obtain lower unit costs for the work . A sum.~ary of the contract is:· 1. District's street improvement curb, gutter, pavement 2. Districts' entrance repaving Subtotal 3. City work, storm drain, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lights Total Engineer's Estimate $183,000 24,ooo $207,000 53,000 . $260 '000 Budget $150,000 15,000 $165,000 The bid. proposal will be itemized in such a manner as t o separate · our project costs from the City's. The resolution appearing in the agenda makes a negative declarat io n with regard to the environmental impact of the project , and estab- lishes a bid date of April 6 so that the work can be accomplished as quickly as possible to minimize traffic conge stion during the summer season. No . 9 -c -Award of Job No . PW-049 -New Water Well No. 1 at Plant No. 1. Bids were received on March 2 for a new water well at the entrance to Plant No . 1. Two bids wer·e . received in the amounts of $42 ,046 and $44,580. It is recomme n ded that the award be made to Mccalla Brothers in the total amount of $42,046 (budget, $40 ,000). The engineer's estimate for this work was $50,000 . No . 9-d -Change Order No . 1 to Contract No. PW-050 . At the time the bid documents for this contract were prepared , the staff incorporated the insurance requirements as set forth in the Standard Provisions for large projects wh ich require liability insurance coverage in the amount of $3,000 ,000. Normally for a project such as this, the maximum amount · required is $1 ,000 ,000. The total contract for this job is $147,969. The contractor sub- mi tt i ng the bid on this project did not anticipate the larger insuranc e r equireme nt and i t is, therefore, the staff's rec orr@end a - t i on that this change crder be appro\ed reducin g the insurance requirements , with no change in the contract price . No . 9-e -Attendance at California Water Po llution Control Association Conference, South Lake Tahoe, April 1 4 -17. This annual confer e nce is being h eld t his year jointly with the Nevada Water Pollution Control Assoc iation . It has been customary to authorize a number of. emp loye es to attend this Annual Conference as we feel that their participation has been beneficial t o the Districts in acquainting our personnel with practices and procedures of other agencies as well as new developments in the wa t e r pollution control f i eld . Our employees are active in the Santa Ana River Basin Section of this Association and as members and officers have a genuine interest in these meetings . It is recommended that authorization be g iven t o designat e 7 District employees and the Joint Chairman to a ttend this mee ting wi th fees and expenses paid . Funds for attendance at the Conference have been included in the current fiscal budget . -2- District No. 1 No. 9-f -Receive and File Letter from Ci ty of Santa Ana Regarding Raitt Street Trunk . Included in the agenda material is a letter from the City of Santa Ana requesting the District to proceed with the design and construction of the Raitt Street Trunk to accommodate proposed developments in the southerly part of the City of Santa Ana. I t is rec ommended that the letter be received and filed and r eferred to the staff for study . District No. 2 No. 9 -g -Change Order No. 3 to Contract No. 2-14 -4. In order to make construction schedule commitments, the con- tractor has requested a change in the construction method of the pipe to be supplied on this project, substituting prestressed pipe in lieu of vertically cast pipe at various locations. This change in construction materials has been discu~sed wibh State per - sonnel who have approved this change order . It is recommended for approval, which will result in no additional cost to the District. No. 9 -h a nd 9 -i -Approvi ng Pipeline License Agreements with the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for Contracts Nos. 2 -14 -3 and 2 -14 -5 . In connection with the construction of the Santa Ana River I nterceptor from La Palma and Grove Streets to the County l ine , it is necessary to obtain right of way from the Santa Fe Rai l way Company where the trunk sewer crosses the Railroad 's right of way . It is recommended that the Board authorize acceptance of the License Agreement and compensate the Company in the amount of $1 50 each for the two crossings . . No. 9-j -Change Order to Purchase Order No . 30196. In December, the Boards approved eme r gency action for the repair of two manho les which were badly deteriorated in State College Boulevard. The contractor was required to clear and remove the deteriorated concrete and replace with new concrete along with a PVC lining to p ro tect the interior of the manhole from future deterioration . During the course of the work, it was observed that the invert of the manhole was badly deteriorated and that a new channel should be constructed to hand l e the flows at · the junction manhole. This corrective work in the amount of $909.88, was performed on a force account basis whi l e the con- tractor was working in the manhole. It is recommended that this change order be approved. -3- No. 9-k -Proposed Annexation to the District. The District has re ceiv ed a request from C. Michael, Inc., for the annexation of 296 acres to the District northwesterly of the Yorba Reg ional Park. Since suffi cient information i s not available at this time for the staff to make a r ecommenda- tion, we request approval of the ac tion appearing in the agenda which receives and files the r equest and refers it to the s ta ff for a r eport. District No. 3 No. 9-1 -Approval of Agreement with Southern Pacific Transportation Company re: Contr act No . 3-21-2 . The alignment of the We s tside Relie f Interceptor, Contract No. 3 -21-2 , crosses the right of way of t he Southern Pacific between Kate lla Avenue and Cerritos Aven ue. It i s recommended that the Board accept the License Agreement a t no cost to the District and the conditions cqntained therein from the Southern Pacific Transportation Company. Districts Nos. 3 a nd 11 No. 9-n -Award of Contract No . 11-lR-l -Manhole Replacement and Repair. Bids for the reconstru c tion a nd repair of 35 deteriorated manholes on the New l and -Deleware Trunk were received on March 2, 1 9 7 6 . Two b i ds were submitted in the amounts of $37,253 and $71 ,.820 . It i s recommended that the award be made to Rewes - Schock in the amount of $37 ,253 for all items of work contained in the propo sal (budget , $70,000). District No . 7 No. 9-o -Acquisition fr om Department of Transportation , Ri ght of Way Adjacent to the San Diego Freeway and the District 's Gisler-Red Hi ll Trunk Sewer Easement in Costa Mesa . In October of last year, the Board a cce pted the offer of the Director's Deed (Quitclaim Deed) for acquisition of excess propert i es of the California Department of Transportation which was deeded to the District at n o cost . Cal Trans has offered to the Distric t another parcel of land ad j acent to the property accepted in October, at no cost to the District. ~h e staff recommends ac c ept- anc e of the State 's offer. -4- No. 9-p -Approving Grant of Pipeline Easement from Southern Pacific re: Contract No. 7-6-7. In June, 1975, the Board declared its intent to accept a Grant of Easement from the Southern Pacific Railroad Company for a portion of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer extending from Irv i ne Boulevard to Seventeenth Street. The Railroad Company has finally completed the necessary documents for execution which have been approved by the General Counsel. It is recommended that the Board accept the easement and authorize the payment to the Railroad Company in the amount of $43,086.25 in accordance with the Board's previous action. No. 9-q -Request fo r Annexation -Tract No . 5369. In June, the Board referred a request for annexation of approximately 7 acres of territory to the District in t he vicinity of Overhill and Miravista Drive in the Cowan Heights Area . The staff has reviewed this request and the proposed deve l .opm ent of the property is consistent with the District's Master Plan; therefore, it is recommended that the anpexation request be approved. If the Board adopts the standard resolution authori- zing the initiation of proceedings, we will advise the developer that he must initiate proceedings to annex to the 70th Sewer Maintenance District for the maintenance of the local sewers. No. 9-r -Proposed Annexation No. 53 -Cray Annexation . The staff has received a request from Mr . and Mrs . Donald Cray to annex their property located at 21252 Santiago Canyon Road~ which is approximately one acre in size . The property owners are in the process of annexing to the City of Orange and are desirous of connecting to a City sewer being constructed in the near vicinity. It is the staff's recommendation that Resolu - tion No. 76-50-7 be approved, authorizing initiation of proceed - ings to annex the property. All necessary fees have been re- ceived. No. 9-s -Change Order No. 1 to Contract No. ll-4R . During the construction of the improvements to the Newland - Hamil ton Pump Station, the contractor was directed to perform additional work which required extensive excavation, foundation m modifications, and extension of the perimeter block wall to better meet the street grades established by the City. It is the staff's recommendation that this change order in the amount of $1,214.95 be approved. -5- All Districts No. 11 -Letter from Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD). In December, the Boards received and refe rred to the staff a draft EIR being prepared for the IRWD, which outlined several alternative pipeline construction projects for the use of the 1 5 mgd ocean outfall capacity purchased from the Sanitation Districts in 1972 . Since three of the alternatives involve capacity acquisition and use of other existing Sanitation District facilities , our staff has advised IRWD personnel that without a c ommitment from the Board of Directors, the suggested alternatives are not valid. We also advised that our staff could not make any recommendations concerning these alternatives without an engineer- ing study to determine the availability of the required 15 mgd capicitie s and the costs associated with the acquisition of those capacities. Prior to the sale of the 15 mgd ocean outfall capacity to IRWD in 1972, our Districts' engineer, J ohn Carollo Engineers, made a similar study which is now out of date. As a result of recent meetings wj _th· the IRWD management, they have submitted a letter, which appears in the agenda material , requesting that the Distr icts engag e our Dis tricts ' eng ineer to make the necessary evaluations for our staff and Boards' con- sideration . The actions appearing on the agenda accept I RWD 's offer to reimburse the Districts for the proposed study , and to authorize the General Manager to engage John Carollo Eng ineers to prepare the required report, with the u nderstandin g t hat the Districts are under no obligation to commit any additional capacities in District facilities to IRWD as a result of this study. No . 12 -Quarterly Financial Report for Period E_nded 1 2 -3 1 -75 .. Enclosed with the agenda material for all Directors is a Financial Report prepared by the Director of Finance for the quarter ended December 31, 1975 .. If any Director has any ques tions concerning the report, please call Way ne Sylvester , 540-2910 . No. 13 -Award of Specification No . A-080. In December, bids wer e taken for six pickup tricks , with the low bidder being Guaranty Chevrole t of Santa Ana . Subsequently, Guaranty Chevrolet withdr ew their bid . Th e staff has readvertised for the purchase of the six pickup trucks and bids will b e received on March 9th. The actions appearing under this item on the agenda r eceive and file -Guaranty Chevrolet 's letter withdrawing their bid and reject all bids receiv ed on December 2nd . Since new bids will ndt be received until next Tuesd a y , the results of the bid opening will be included in Wednesday's Supplemental Agenda . -6- Di str ict No . 5 No. 20 -Second Reading and Possible Adoption of Proposed Or d inance No . 509. Ordinance No . 509 amends Section 402 of existing Ordinance No . 508 , increasing the District connection fees to be more comparable wi th the established connection charges in Districts Nos . 2 , 3 , and 7 . The present District No . 5 connection charges are $1 75 for new s i ngle-family dwellings and $90 per 1000 square. feet of new construction other than single-family dwellings. The new ordinance will increase the fee to $250 per dwelling unit and $1 30 per 1000 squa re f eet of floor surface for new construction other than single -family dwelling units . Hearin g notices were sent to all permit holders and interested persons and public ent ities affected by the proposed change . As of thi s writing , no additional comm e nts have been received from the public since the February Joint Board meeting . It i s recommended that the Board adopt the ordinance Wednesday e v ening if no changes are made as a result of the second readi ng . Dist rict No. 6 No . 23 -Adoption of Uniform Mileage Reimbursement . The staff is requesting that all Boards have a uniform Directors ' mileage charge to avoid a complicated, time -consuming r ecor dkeeping procedure . Presently, Districts Nos . 1 , 6 , and 7 r eimburse Directors for mileage at $.11 per mile , while Districts Nos .. 2, 3, 5 , and 11 pay Direc tors ' mileage compensation at $.15 per mile for the firs t 150 miles, $.12 for each mile over 150 up to 600 and $.06 for all miles in excess of 600 actua lly trave l ed on bu siness of the District per month . It is the staff 's recommendation that the Board adopt Resolution No . 76 -51 -6, adjusting the mi leage reimbursement figur e t o be consistent with the other Districts and our employees ' mil eage reimbursement . Dist ric t No. 1 No. 26 -Di rectors ' Compensation and Mileage . In February , the Board deferred consideration of changes in the Dir ectors ' compensation and mileage to the March Joint Board meeting . Two reso l utions are in the agenda for the Board 's con- s i deration. Resolut i on No . 76 -33 -1 is similar to the policy adopted by all other Districts in 1973 but not adopted by District No . 1. Howeve r, the staff has modified the mileage compensation , Section 4 , to be cons i stent with those Districts that recently mo d ified the compensation and mileage sections . -7- Presently, Districts 1, 6, and 7 reimburse Directors for mileag e· at $.11 per mile while Districts 2, 3, 5, and 11 com- pensate Directors for mileage expense at $.15 per mi l e for the first 150 miles and $.12/mile for mileage over 150 miles up to 600 miles and $.06/mile for all miles in excess of 600 during any one month. The staff is requesting that all Boards have a uniform mileage charge to avoid a complicated , time -cons u mirig r ecord - keeping procedure . Resolution No. 76 -11-1 is identical iLl form and content to that recently adopted by Districts Nos. 2 , 3, and 11. District No. 7 No. 29 -Adjustment of Current Annexation Fees. (This item was deferred from the Board's February meeting). Effective July 1, 1 975, al l Districts adopted a uniform annexation fee policy . The annual annexation fee equal s each District's asse ts minus its liabilities, divided by the number of acres within the Di strict. Therefore, based on this formula , the District 's staff has quoted an annexation fee of $1,029 per acre for District No . 7. Du ring a recent review of the cal culations, we find that the collect ion system figures include $3.6 mil l ion for local sewers such as assessment district sewers and local sewers within tracts . Therefore, the staff recommend s that the Board authorize an adjustment of the annexation fee to $828 per acre , thereby eliminating the inclusion of loc a l collection systems which have no bearing on the costs of the District 's Master Plan system and treatment works . No. 30 -Further Consideration of the Proposed Annexation of Orange Park Acres (deferred from February 11th Board Meet ing). This matter was de f erred from the February 11th Board meeting and t he following is the staff 's eval uation of the Orange Park Acres annexation proposal dated January 28, 1 976. -8- . . Election Re: Annexation and+Improvement District General Obligation Bonds $1,141,000- Essentially, the proponents are proposing the formation of an Improvement District to issue general obligation bonds following a successful annexation/bond election (2/3 ·majority) in the amount of $1,141,000.· The bond pro- ceeds will acquire "right of service and use of the District's existing facilities" which are equal to the anne~ation fees $455 ,400, payment of $671,6~4± for the necessary Master Plan Trunk Sewers, Reaches 17 ·and l~, to serve the area, and $15,000 r eimburseme nt of advances by proponents of the annexation proceedings. · Prepaid Connection Charges for Parcels Within Proposed Annexation · Each existing parcel within the annexed area as of the date of the election will be credited with one connection charge ($250) at the time the property is hooked to the sewer. (425 parcels x $250 per conn~ction equals $106,250). Any division of land after the date of election will result in the property owners obligation to pay a d ditional rionnection charges. Installation of Loial Sew~rs The property owners will construct the local collector sewers either by cash financing or by assessment proceedings . Reimbursement· of Funds Related to Master Plan Subtrunk System Funded by Bond Issue As a condition of the general obligation bond proceedings , the Sanitation District will contribute, from District -w ide collection of connection charges 1 funds ~elated to the subtrunk system funded by the bond issue ~671,684-·, minus th~ prepaid ·connection charges $106,250. These funds, $565,434 -which will only be payable upon receipt of connection charges, will be deposited in the Improvement District Bond and Interest Redemption Fund, subject to previously authorized Master Plan r eimbursement agreements. The proceeds deposited in the Bond Redemption Fund will be used for the purpose of retiring bonds in advance of maturity or for payment of both bond principal and interest when due. -9- Tax Rate to Retire Imorovement District Bonds This is the staff's projection of the annual debt service for the issuance of $1,141,000 general obligation bonds for the Orange Park Acres 550 acre annexation. Annual Debt Service -7 percent, 15-years Annual Improvement District Tax Rate March, 1975 assessed value = $5,465,000 $125·, 300 ' (a) (b) Tax Rate $125,300 $5,~65,~00 ~ 1 00 = $2.2928 per $100/A .V.** Annual County Sanitation District No. 7 tax rate = $0.4026 per $100/A.V. Total Annual Tax Rate = $2.6954 per $100/A.V. **This tax rate will be' reduced by District connection charges coll ected and transferred to the Improvement Bond and Interest Redemption Fund equal to $564,234± during the life of the bonds. · " -----------------------·-------- No. 31 -Adoption of Un iform Mileage Reimbursement. The staff is requesting that all Boards have a uni form Directors' mileage charg e to avoid a complicated time-consuming recordkeeping procedure. Presently , Districts Nos . 1, 6 , and 7 reimburse Directors for mi leage at $.11 per mile , while Districts Nos. 2 , 3, 5, and 11 pay Di rectors ' mileage compensation at $.15 per mile for the first 150 miles, $.1 2 for each mile over 150 u p to 600 , and $.06 for all miles in excess of 600 actual ly traveled on business of t~e District per month. It is the staff's r ecommendation that the Board adopt Resolution No. 76-52-7 adjusting the mi leage reimbursement figure to be consistent with the other Districts and our employees ' mil eage reimbursement. -10- Fred A. Harper General Manager 4 BOARDS OF om~CTORS County Sanitation O:Stricts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 II (I) (2) FILE .......... ·-{"5) LEmR ......•..•..•• A/C •••• TI<LR {4) (5) Fi LE ······-·-··~ 6) LETIER .............. A/C .... TKLR , ••• ···--·-·-···----- ······------ ~ JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE MARCH 10, 1976 -·7:30 P;M. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation Roll Call Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary Te le phones: Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA ADJOUnN;.: i::NTS ...... =: ...... " CO~i:P & ~,i;LEN~E ..... ~. FILES s:r UP ...... ~: ....... . RES(ll.U;;o;:·:; C!::~TiFIED .. ~ LErrrns r. :::; ::r·i ............. . MlriUTES •,·,:~:TEN ... ~ .. . MINUTES FILED .... ~ ..... . Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any. See supplemental agenda EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes of the .. following meetings, as mailed: Ml~ District 1 February 11, .1976 regular "")5 District 2 February 11, 1976 regular MIS District 3 February 11, 1976 regular(~) ~5 District 5 February 11, 1976 regular, and March 3, 1976 special It\ ts District 6 February 11, 1976 .regular 1vtls District 7 February 11, 1976 regular ,..,, $0 µls District 11 February IL 1976 regular ALL DISTRICTS R~po:.ts of: ~ Joint Chairman @ General Manager @ General Counsel (7) ALL DI STRICTS Considerati on of mot i on to r e c e ive and file ce rtifica t ion of the Ge n e ral Ma n a ge r that he h a s ch eck e d a ll bills a ppea r ing on the acen da, fo und them to be in orde r, a nd th a t he r ecommen ds autho ri zation fo r p ayme nt (8) ALL DIS TRICTS (8) ROL L CA LL VOT E ............. - ITE MS O N S UPPLEMENTAL AGEN DA Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Flllld ~cco:mts payable check re?i:ters for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and a~thorizing payment of claims listed on page "I" ; and approving accolllltS payable check registers for si~a~ure of the Chai~an of.the . respective District, and auth orizin g payment of said claims listed on the pages indicated below: DISTRICT 1 'n'an·ants, if any ...................... · .. NONE DISTRICT 2 warrants -See page "II" DISTRICT 3 warrants -See page "II" DISTRICTS 3 6 11 3tt5pense ftmci • .. ·ar:rants, if any ...... NONE DISTRICT 5 warrants -See page "I" DISTRICTS 5 6 6 suspense fund wa:r:rants, if any.. . . . . NON E DISTRICT 6 ·,;a rrents, if any •.•.•.••.•••••••••••.•••• NON E DISTRICT 7 warrants -See page "III" DISTRICT 11 warrants -See page (9) ALL DI ST RICTS "II I" Ro!/ Call Vote or Cas t Unan imous Ballot CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS I 9 (A) THROUGH 9 ( s ) All ma tt ers pl ace d upo n th e consent ca l endar are cons idere d as n o t r equ i r i n g di scuss i on or fur th er explanat ion and llll l ess any par t i c ula r ite m i s reques t e d t o be remove d f r om the co n sent ca l en da r by a Di rector , staff membe r, or membe r of the pub lic in a t tendan ce , t here will b e no separat e di scussion of th es e items . All i tems on th e con sen t cal e n dar wi ll b e en act e d by on e act i on approvin g a l l motions , a nd cas ting a unanimo us b a llo t f or reso lut i ons inc l uded on the con sent c a l enda r. All items r emo v e d fr om t h e consent c a l enda r sha ll b e cons idered i n th e r egul a r orde r · of busines s . Membe r s of the public who wis h to r emove a n i tem from the con sent cal en dar s h a ll, upon r ecogni tion by t he c h a i r, state the i r n ame, address a nd des i gnat e by l ett e r the i tem t o be remove d fro m the con sent ca l en dar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Ch a i rma n will d e t ermin e i f a ny items are to be de l e t ed f rom the consent ca l e n dar. Con sid e r ati on o f acti on t o app r ov e all agenda i tems appearing on th e co n sent ca l enda r n ot specifica lly removed from same . ~) ~, 'r\ -2 - (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ~ ~~_r: __ v LETT£R ••··•········· A/C .•.. TKLR .... ..-.-·-··-··-········· ' ....... ---·-··-··· .. FILE -······-····--- LETTER ·······-····· A/C •••• TKLR •••• ~ . ./ ·-··-··-············· ~~ ~~ ... k: ........ U]"TER' •.. ~---·· A/C ••.• TKLR -- .. ii~_!L- f1LE --: ---·- ~~.a .. ~.-~V' A/C ••.• TKLR •••• FILE ···············-· LETTER ··········- -----··-·····--- FILE 1:.-?..' .. k ..... . LETTER ....•.......•• A/C __ .TKLR -~ --······-·············· ....... --················ FILE ..•.............•• LETTER ·······-····· A/C .... TKLR •••• . --v ,.~·····;:···· '1.m~.R ) ..... ---· ~--' -'\i: A/C LTKLR ~··'- ~ , ... ~. _; ---~-~-~~-It.- '----····~······;J~·T ALL DISTRICTS (a) (b) (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from City of Huntington Beach, dated February 18, 1976, relative to inclusion of certain street improvements in the contract for Brookhurst Street Improvements, Job No. P2-8-8, for which the City will reimburse the Districts. See page "A" Consideration of Resolution No. 76-41, making a Negative Declaration and providing for notice thereof, and approving plans and specifications for Brookhurst Street Improvements, Job No. P2-8-8, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on April 6, 1976, said specification and proposal documents to provide separate bid items for improvements to be performed on behalf of the City of Huntington Beach and reimbursed to the Districts by the City. See page "B" Consideration of Resolution No. 76-42, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for New Water Well No. 1 at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-049, to McCalla Bros., in the amount of $42,046.00. See pages "C" and "D" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Installation of Foul Air Treatment at Plant No. 2, Headworks "C", Job No. PW-050, authorizing a reduction in the insurance coverage requirements for the contract with Skipper & Company. See page "E" Consideration of motion authorizing the Joint Chairman and seven employees to attend the 48th Annual Conference of the California Water Pollution Control Association to be held April 14-16, 1976, ·at Lake Tahoe;-and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection with attendance at said conference DISTRICT 1 (f) Consideration of motion to receive, file and refer to staff letter from City of Santa Ana dated February 23, 1976, relative to construction of the Raitt Street Trunk Sewer northerly of Sllllflower Avenue. See page "F" DISTRICT 2 (g) (h) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Reach 5, Contract No. 2-14-4, authorizing a change in the type of concrete pipe, at no cost to the District. See page "G" Consideration of Resolution No. 76-43-2, approving and authorizing execution of Pipe-Line License agreement with The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company in connection with construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor and South Santa Ana River Inter- ceptor Connector, Reaches 2, 3 and 4, Contract No. 2-14-3; and authorizing payment in the amollllt of $150.00 for said license. See page "H" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) FILE ··---···V. ... ~---·~······ I Ill D ).)I\_' A/C ---~~~ +/' ~~~~~~:~~~~ FILE ···-···········- LETIER ·······-·- A/C •.•• TKLR ··--~~-> ~--··················- ( ·--, '~········v.:·-· LETIER ·····---~ A/C _ .. TKLR •••• .....__ / -_-___ .. _ .. K.: .. _ """'' ~-- A/C .... TKLR 1 ~:~~---·-· r;-, ·. ~ v FILE ~-~········ LETIER ····-·-- A/C .... TKLR ·- FILE •••••• ':.:. ••••••• _ I -,ETTE~ ... : ____ _ __ ,,. ~~:~~~- -, v FILE •••••••••••••••••• ;~ER--~­ AJC' .. .itKLRJ •••• DISTRICT 2 (Continued) (i) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-44-2, approving and authorizing execution of Pipe-Line License agreement with The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company in connection with construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Reaches 6, 7 and 8, Contract No. 2-14-5; and authorizing payment in the amount of $150.00 for said license. See page "I" (j) Consideration of motion authorizing issuance of a change order to the emergency purchase order contract with F. B. Cook Corporation for additional work in the amollllt of $909.88, relative to reshaping of manhole in connection with repairs at the intersection of State College Boulevard and Orangethorpe (Newhope-Placentia Trtmk Sewer) (k) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from C. Michael, Inc. for annexation of approximately 295.87 acres of territory to the District northerly of the Yorba Regional Park, and refer to staff for study and recommendation. See page "J" DISTRICT 3 (1) (m) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-45-3, approving and authorizing execution of agreement with Southern Pacific Transportation Company for right of way in connection with construction of the Westside Relief Interceptor, Portion of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 and 29, Contract No. 3-21-2, at no cost to the District. See page "K" Consideration of motion to receive and file Swnmons and First Amended Complaint for Damages for Persomi:...i Injuries, in Case No. 239335, Darryl Nasser vs. Radna Balstad, et al., in connection with construction of the Westside Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 and Portion of 27, Contract No. 3-21-1, and refer to the District's General Counsel and liability insurance carrier for appropriate action. DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Consideration of Resolution No. 76-46, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Manhole Replacement and Repair, Contract No. 11-lR-l, to Rewes-Schock, in the amount o·f $37,253.00. See pages "L" and "M" DISTRICT 7 (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-47-7, authorizing acceptance of Director's Deed from the State of California, Department of Transpor- tation, for acquisition of excess property adjacent to the San Diego Freeway and abutting the District's easement for the Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-1, at no cost to the District. See page "N" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) .,.._,,, -/ \ FILE ••• -.Jl---'---- \. LETTER ···---·-Ate .~ .. TKLV ·--~~~--·­~~-~,/ .¥~-----········ ... - FILE •••.••..•.. ~~ c§~R!: ..... :_ ..... A/C .... TKLR •••• ._-~·;.~.~---~;~~~N, :~~~~-~~: .. f.~~::.: .. :.. \. f fiLe .... L~-....... - -: ) i\\-(_ LET~~.R ·-····-··- A/C .••. TKLR •••• '~.:::.c~~:~ ... 2'?:~.:c ~ ···-····-················ FILE •••••••.•...•••••• -TTER ·······-····· """1f/C .•.• TKLR .••• -·----··············-· DISTRICT 7 (Continued) (p) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-48-7, approving and authorizing execution of agreement with Southern Pacific Transportation Company for right of way in connection with construction of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 11 and Portion of Reach 12, Contract No. 7-6-7; and authorizing payments in the amounts of $40,000.00 for permanent right of way and $ 3, 086. 25 for temporary right of way. See page· "0" (q) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-49-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 6.647 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Overhill and Miravista Drive (Proposed Annexation No. 48 -Tract No. 5369 to Cotmty Sanitation District No. 7) (r) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Donald Cray for annexation of approximately one acre of territory to the District in the vicinity of Sanitago Canyon Road and Amapola Avenue; and consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-50-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory (Proposed Annexation No. 53 -Cray Annexation to Cotmty Sanitation District No. 7) See page "P" DISTRICT 11 (s) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications to Remodel Newland-Hamilton Pumping Station Facilities, Contract No. ll-4R, authorizing an addition of $1,214.95 to the contract with Clifford L. Thompson Construction Company for additional block wall and excavation and grading, and granting a time extension of 30 calendar days to accomplish said work. See page "Q" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -5- . (11) ALL DISTRICTS (a) FILE ~<f:' l ETTER .............. N) I s Considera tion of motion to receive and file letter from Irvine Ranch Wa ter District d ated March 4, 1976, r e lative to alternate· connection points to the Sanitation Districts' outfall system and costs as s ociate d therewith.pursuant to the agreement between the respective parties c .... 1 Kl R ... . dated .January 12, 1972. See page "R" Conside ration of motion authorizing the General Manager to engage /:'~)_.-.-1~····;,~-·.~-~ N\ ).S John Carollo Engineers to prepare a report regarding Irvine Ranch Water · ~-~~~-~-, District's request for information relative to alternate connection tEnER ·······-··-~ points to the Districts' outfall system, all costs of said study and ----(b) A/C ____ ,.KLR •••• report to be borne by the Irvine Ranch Water District :~::r.:::~12) ALL DISTRIC!S f . . d l\/\\S Consideration o motion to receive an file financial report of Director of 11 1 Finance for quar ter ending December 31, 1975 (Mailed with agenda material) (13) ALL DISTRICTS Othe~ business 4Il~comnunications or supplemental agenda items, if any ~~~of .items relative to award of Specification No. A-080, ~Six (6) 1/2 Ton Pickup Trucks (Awarded to Guaranty Chevrolet on 12/10/75): ITEMS ON SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA (1) FILE •••..••••...•.•• ,. ~~R?~ A/C .... 1 KLR •••• tQJ..~~~ v ~~~2~ ~ l '::> ~1?(2) M~ (3J Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Guaranty Chevrolet dated February 19, 1976, withdrawing their bid on Specification No. A-080 due to an error thereon. See page ~-"_S_"~ Consideration of motion rejecting all bids received on December 2, 1975, for Specification No. A-080, Six (6) 1/2 Ton Pickup Trucks Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding purchase of Six (6). 1/2 Ton Pickup Trucks, Specification No. A-080 Rebid, to Santa Ana Dodge in the amount of $26,076.00. See page "IV'' -· '?~~2 <:::.--~ s (14) DISTRICT 2 :~~E~·-:::::::::::::: ~business and communications or supplemental agenda i terns, if any A/C .... l"KLR .... , ~Consideration of request of Director Dale T . Chaput, Councilman, ~-~~oN City of Yorba Linda, dated March 3, 1976, to reconsider Resolution SUP PLEMENTAL AGENDA No. 76-12-2 establishing the compensation and expense reimbursement ·························· policies for Directors, adopted by the Board at the regular meeting FllE ~ . on February 11, 1976. See page "V" ~~ ( 12.-"t-P "\LW ~) LETT~~~----~~ Consideration of request of Garden Grove Sanitary District-,-dated -A~-,.~~~~ March 9, 1976, regarding waiver of sewer connection fees. See -~~:~1~Lfi;\ENTAL AGENDA page "VI" (15) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn g ~ ~ (16) i terns, if any (17) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn 9-.~~ (18) (19) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn g;.;;)~ -6- (20) DISTRICT 5 'frlE ~--:~-~..: . ( LETTER f ··-·····"" ATC .... TKLR •••• ~-.. ~ Second reading on Proposed Ordinance No. 509, an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 505, as amended, and Ordinance No. 508, Pertaining to Connection Charges. See page "T" (a) (b) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 509, an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 505, as amended, and Ordinance No. 508, Pertaining to Connection Charges, by title only, and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) ~ CL.~ 9 ~ RDl.l CALL VOTE ( c) ~ "f.1Ts Consideration of roll call vote adopting Ordinance No. 509, an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 505, as amended, and Ordinance No. 508, Pertaining to Connection Charges (21) DISTRICT 5 Othe busine agenda items, if any FILE ....••...•..••.•.. lffiER ········{22) DISTRICT 5 A/C •••• TKLR •••• Consideration of motion to adjourn ~·. C lP -----'"'3) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of Resolution No. 76-51-6, amending Resolution No. 73-52-6 Roll Call Vote or Cast • d f D · , · f · 1 · mb unanifous Ballot to provi e or irectors uni onn mi eage expense rei ursement for each ~\S District of the Joint Administrative Organization. See page "U" (24) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn 3:;J7 OR "V" R~ll Vote or cast Consideration of Resolution No. 76-11-1, establishing the compensation and UnanimouUBallot • b t 1 · · f · t D · t d l " R 1 t · FILE .••..••••••••••• '!. ~ expense reim ursemen po 1cies or i s irec o!s_,,... ana !e..J?ea ing eso u ions LETTER ••••••.• !!\ Nos. 63-128 and 68-3-1. See page "W" ~ A/C _.TKLR .••• DISTRICT 1 --····--·Q7) Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ~ -----·-····--· (28) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~~3,0 rvi/@ DISTRICT 7 Roll Call Vote or Cast Consideration of Resolution No. nous Ballot establishing annexation policy, ~ ·····i.~"fev See page "X" ~~ ~--·········- A/C .... TKLR -~~ 76-39-7, amending Resolution No. 75-44-7 re computation of annexation acreage fee. -7- (30) DISTRICT 7 -rti: ···········-·-(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file legal op1n1on of the District's General Counsel relative to the request of the proponents of annexation of the Orange Park Acres area to establish an improve- ment district solely to pay the District annexation fees. See ·~TTER •••••••..••••• A/~~~~~~~~: .. ~~~~N) Is page "Y" ~-·--·····-··-······ (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter fro~ Peggy L. ) McElligott, Attorney for Orange Park Association, dated January 28, me -·······-········ ft1 \7 1976, regarding Proposal for Concurrent Annexation and Bond ~~~~ Authorization -Orange Park Acres. See page "Z" ~~k.<§) --~\ Consideration of request of Orange Park Association re annexation cyi conditio11s therefoi;. as determined by the Board ~ \lQ.~ &9 ~ ...._ ~. 71.D -S::>-'1 (31) Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous }Jl°} FILE ................ rr\ / LmER ····--··- DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 76-52-7, amending Resolution No. 73-53-7 to provide for Directors' uniform mileage expense reimbursement for each District of the Joint Administrative Organization. See page "AA" A/C ._.mR@ DISTRICT 7 ___ Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any '...... . ...... (33) DISTRICT 7 Considerat1on of motion to adjourn q ·. fB -8- II DO ARDS OF Dm~CTORS · j ... ~£l County Sanitation Dhtricts tJ 1 /JJll"" -~. ~I.'· I·,_ I ___ ~ .. ~ -··f'l _____ fl --. of Orange County, California ~ _ _ Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE MARCH 10, 1976 -·7:30 P.M. (I) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary Area Code 71-4 540-2910 962-2-411 AGENDA (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any. See supplemental agenda (5) EACH DISTRICT (6) Consideration of motions approving minutes of th~ .. following meetings, as mailed: District 1 February 11, .1976 regular District 2 February 11, 1976 regular JI>~~ District 3 February 11, 1976 regular District 5 February 11, 1976 regular, and March 3, 1976 special District 6 February 11, 1976 regular District 7 February 11, 1976 regular District 11 February IL 1976 regular ALL DISTRICTS R~poTts of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel (7) ALL DI STRICTS Consideration of motion to receive nnd file c e rtifica ti on of the Genera l Man a ger that he has ch e cked all bills ap p ea rin g on t he aeenda, f ound them to be in order, and that he rec omme nds a uth o ri zation for paym e nt (8) ALL DI ST RICTS (8) RGlL CAL L VO TE ............. - ITEMS ON SUPPLEMENTAL AGEN DA Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revol~ing Ftmd ~cco1;ffits payable check re?i:ters for signature of the Chairma n of District No. 1, and authorizing p ayment of claims listed on page "I" ; and approving ac c otmts payable check re?isters for sigi;a~ure of the Chai~an of.the . respective District, and authorizing paym ent of said claims listed on the pages indicated below: DISTRICT 1 wa:n'atlts, if aft)' .•..•••.•...•............ NONE DISTRICT 2 warrants -See page "II" DISTRICT 3 warrants -See page "II" DISTRICTS 3 8 11 9tt5pct19 e fuftd waI'I'aRts, if atly ..... · NONE DISTRICT 5 warrants -See page "I" DISTRICTS 5 8 6 9u9pet1se fuftd \faFFatltS, if any ..•... NONE DISTRICT 6 ~;arrMts, if any ..•.•....•.••.•.......... NONE (9) DISTRICT 7 warrants -See page DISTRICT 11 warrants --See page ALL DISTRICTS "III" "III" Roll Call Vote or Cas t Unan imo us Ba llot CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS, 9(A) THROUGH 9(s) All matters plac ed upon the consent cal e ndar are cons ide red as not requiring discus s ion or furth er expl a n a tion and tmless any particular ite m is r e ques ted to be r emov ed f rom the c onsent c a l e ndar by a Director, s t aff membe r, or memb er of the public in att e ndance, there will be n o separate discussion of th e se items. All ite ms on the c onsen t calenda r will be enacted by on e acti on approvi ng al l mot i ons, and casting a un anim o us b a llot for r es olutions included on the cons ent cal e ndar. All ite ms remov e d from th e cons ent calendar shall be considered in the re gular orde r · o f busin e ss. Members of the public who wish to r em ove an item f r om the cons ent calenda r sha ll, up on r e cognition by the chair, state their n a me, addr es s a nd d es i gnate by lette r the item to be r emov ed from the cons e nt calendar . * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairma n will d e termine if a ny items are to be d e l e ted fro m the c onsent cal endar. Con s i de ration of a c tion to app r ov e all agenda i t erns appea r ing on th e con sent c a l e ndar not spe cifi ca lly r e mo v e d f rom same. -2- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from City of Huntington Beach, dated February 18, 1976, relative to inclusion of certain street improvements in the contract for Brookhurst Street Improvements, Job No. P2-8-8, for which the City will reimburse the Districts. See page "A" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-41, making.a Negative Declaration and providing for notice thereof, and approving plans and specifications for Brookhurst Street Improvements, Job No. P2-8-8, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on April 6, 1976, said specification and proposal documents to provide separate bid items for improvements to be performed on behalf of the City of Huntington Beach and reimbursed to the Districts by the City. See page "B" (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-42, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for New Water Well No. 1 at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-049, to McCalla Bros., (d) (e) (f) in the amount of $42,046.00. See pages "C" and "D" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Installation of Foul Air Treatment at Plant No. 2, Headworks "C", Job No. PW-050, authorizing a reduction in the insurance coverage requirements for the contract with Skipper & Company. See page "E" Consideration of motion authorizing the Joint Chairman and seven employees to attend the 48th Annual Conference of the California Water Pollution Control Association to be held April 14-16, 1976, ·at Lake Tahoe; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection with attendance at said conference Consideration of motion to receive, file and refer to staff letter from City of Santa Ana dated February 23, 1976, relative to construction of the Raitt Street Trunk Sewer northerly of Sllllflower Avenue. See page "F" DISTRICT 2 (g) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Reach 5, Contract No. 2-14-4, authorizing a change in the type of concrete pipe, at no cost to the District. See page "G" (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-43-2, approving and authorizing execution of Pipe-Line License agreement with The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company in connection with construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor and South Santa Ana River Inter- ceptor Connector, Reaches 2, 3 and 4, Contract No. 2-14-3; and authorizing payment in the amollllt of $150.00 for said license. See page "H" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) DISTRICT 2 (Continued) (i) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-44-2, approving and authorizing execution of Pipe-Line License agreement with The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company in connection with construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Reaches 6, 7 and 8, Contract No. 2-14~5; and authorizing payment in the amount of $150.00 for said license. See page "I" (j) Consideration of motion authorizing issuance of a change order to the emergency purchase order contract with F. B. Cook Corporation for additional work in the amount of $909.88, relative to reshaping of manhole in connection with repairs at the intersection of State College Boulevard and Orangethorpe (Newhope-Placentia Trllllk Sewer) (k) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from C. Michael, Inc. for annexation of approximately 295.87 acres of territory to the District northerly of the Yorba Regional Park, and refer to staff for study .and recommendation. See page "J" DISTRICT 3 (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-45-3, approving and authorizing execution of agreement with Southern Pacific Transportation Company for right of way in connection with construction of the Westside Relief Interceptor, Portion of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 and 29, Contract No. 3-21-2, at no cost to the District. See page "K" (m) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and First Amended Complaint for Damages for Personnel Injuries, in Case No. 239335, Darryl Nasser vs. Radna Balstad, et al., in connection with construction of the Westside Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 and Portion of 27, Contract No. 3-21-1, and refer to the District's General Collllsel and liability insurance carrier for appropriate action. DISTRICTS 3 & 11 (n) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-46, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Manhole Replacement and Repair, Contract No. 11-lR-l, to Rewes-Schock, in the amount of $37,253.00. See pages "L" and "M" DISTRICT 7 (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-47-7, authorizing acceptance of Director's Deed from the State of California, Department of Transpor- tation, for acquisition of excess property adjacent to the San Diego Freeway and abutting the District's easement for the Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-1, at no cost to the District. See page "N" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 7 (Continued) (p) Consideration of Resolution No . 76-48-7, approving and authorizing execution of agreement with Southern Pacific Transportation Company for right of way in connection with construction of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 11 and Portion of Reach 12, Contract No. 7-6-7; and authorizing payments in the amounts of $40,000.00 for permanent right of way and $3,086.25 for temporary right of way . See page "0" (q) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-49-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 6.647 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Overhill and Miravista Drive (Proposed Annexation No. 48 -Tract No. 5369 to County Sanitation District No. 7) (r) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Donald Cray for annexation of approximately one acre of territory to the District in the vicinity of Sanitago Canyon Road and Amapola Avenue; and consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-50-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory (Proposed Annexation No. 53 -Cray Annexation to Cotmty Sanitation District No. 7) See page "P" DISTRICT 11 (s) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications to Remodel Newland-Hamilton Pumping Station Facilities, Contract No. 11-4R, authorizing an addition of $1,214.95 to the contract with Clifford L. Thompson Construction Company for additional block wall and excavation and grading, and granting a time extension of 30 calendar days to a c complish said work. See page "Q" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -5- (11) ALL DISTRICTS (12) (13) (a) Consideration o f motion to receive and file l etter from I rvine Ranch Water District dated Ma r ch 4, 1976, relative to a l ternate connection points to the Sanitation Di stri cts ' outfall system an d cos ts associ ated therewith.pursuant to the agreemen t between the respective parties dated January 12 , 1972. See page 11 R" (b) Consid eration of mo tion authorizing the General Manage r to engage John Carollo Engineers to prepare a report regarding Irvine Ranch Wa ter " District's requ es t for informat ion re l ative to alternate connection points to the Districts' outfall system, all cos ts of sai d study and r eport to be borne by the Irvi n e Ran ch Water District ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to rece i ve and file f inancial report of Director of Finance for quarter ending December 31, 1975 (Mailed with agenda material) ALL DI STRICTS Other business and corronunications or s upplemental agenda items , if any (13-a) Consideration of .items relative to award of Specification No. A-080, Six (6) 1/2 Ton Pickup Trucks (Awarded to Guaranty Chevrolet on 12/10/75): ITEMS ON SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Guaranty Chevrolet dated February 19, 1976, withdrawing their bid on Specifica tion No. A-080 due to an error the r e on. See p a ge "S" (2) Consideration of motion rejecting all bids received on De c e mber 2, . 1975, for Specification No. A-080, Six (6) 1/2 Ton Pick up Trucks (3) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and reconun endation, and awarding purchase of Six (6). 1/2 Ton Pickup Trucks, Specification No . A-080 Rebid, to Santa Ana Dod ge in the a mount of $26,076.00. See page "IV'' t\-~ (14) DISTRICT 2 ~(:~ Oth e r business and conununica tions or supp lem ental agenda items, if any \.~v . (14-a) Consideration of request of Director Dale T. Chaput, Councilman, ITEMS ON City of Yorba Linda, dated March 3, 1976, to reconsider Resolution UPPLEMENTAL AGENDA No. 76-12-2 establishing the compensation and expense reimbursement policies for Directors, adopted by the Board at the regular meeting (14-b) ITEMS ON Sul'PLE MENTA L AGENDA on February 11, 1976. See page "V" ) . /J I Consideration of request of Garden Grove Sanitary District, ~~ted : ~ )1') ~:;~h 9, 11 ~i~6, regarding waiver o~ sewer connection fees. Se/.~ h ~ ~~ 7 [.) ~k ~f' ~ ;,.:,.".,,;:.... 1'f'-6'f ~ c ,, \<t'~ (15) DISTRICT 2 D 1..11 V .11 L II _'-o f\&rr Consideration of motion to adjourn ~:rl ·u.7 ~ (16) DISTRICT 3 (17) (18) (19) Oth er business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any DI STR ICT 3 / Consideration of motion to adjourn ~·,?'1 .. DISTRICT 11 Other business and commun i cations or supplemental agenda items , if any DISTRICT 11 Con s ideration of mot i on to adjourn 'D'· ...,.f -6- (20) DISTRICT S .ROl.L CALL VOTE Second reading on Proposed Ordinance No. 509, an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. SOS, as amended, and Ordinance No. 508, Pertaining to Connection Charges. See page "T" ~) (b) (c) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. S09, an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. SOS, as amended, and Ordinance No. 508, Pertaining to Connection Charges, by title only, and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) Discussion and conunents, if any 11••...........- Consideration of roll call vote adopting Ordinance No. 509, an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. SOS, as amended, and Ordinance No. S08, Pertaining to Connection Charges (21) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (23) DISTRICT 6 V C Consideration of Resolution No. 76-51-6, amending Resolution No. 73-52-6 Roll Call ote or ast • d f D • 1 • f · 1 · Unanimous Ballot to provi e or irectors uni orm mi eage expense reimbursement for each District of the Joint Administrative Organization. See page "U" (24) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (26) DISTRICT 1 Roll Call Vote or Cast C?nsideration of Resolution No. 76-33-1, fixing compensation for its unanimous Ballot Directors and rescinding Resolutions Nos. 63-128 and 68-3-1. See page "V" OR Roll call vote or cast Consideration of Resolution No. 76-11-1, establishing the compensation and Unanimous Ballot expense reimbursement policies for its Directors, and repealing Resolutions Nos. 63-128 and 68-3-1. See page "W" (27) DISTRICT 1 (28) (29) Roll Call Vote or Cast iimous Ballot Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 76-39-7, amending Resolution No. 75-44-7 establishing annexation policy, re computation of annexation acreage fee. See page "X" fi ~ '. , · I J ,, k.i , /,) , ~)~, I.~~ ~ 1~1: 41.'J ~~~·~-c ~P ~· -' ~~-'''a 0 ..l t I . ~ ~ f :;.., i'4-·: .' ,. I <,, -- M,1X .. _ .. · -~~ ~, P~ , t re -. '- 1 , r , .r.;-. . . . .1 1 . . -· .• .ft /) ~/Cr:~ ,, ·;t,. .. t ( ;i.''J. ;,,_, _ ~""'i'' ~~~J ),. ,;,~}:'~ ,..-.~:d;) (30) DISTRICT 7 (31) Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot (32) I (33) ~. (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file legal op1n1on of the District's General Counsel relative to the request of the proponents of annexation of the Orange Park Acres area to establish an improve- ment district solely to pay the District annexation fees. See page "Y" (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Peggy L. McElligott, Attorney for Orange Park Association, dated January 28, · 1976, regarding Proposal for Concurrent Annexation and Bond Authorization -Orange Park Acres. See page "Z" (c) Consideration of request of Orange Park Association re annexation and conditions therefor, as determined by the Board DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 76-52-7, amending Resolution No. 73-53-7 to provide for Directors' uniform mileage expense reimbursement for each District of the Joint Administrative Organization. See page "AA" DISTRICT 7 ), Other business and comrn~ica~i,ons o'r. _ s~pleme~~l -.agen~ _i te', ~r any /1 ~..6P.1.- DISTRICT 7 ~,.I { 1 (c ,-! J,_ I . e_,i , j·~"~" ,.._.. ''iu f;c ~ U Consideration of motion to adjo~ I J .. i 1)., .. f., ()~· /> , ) tJ ( /! I J: . ') ~ ~ .. ~. ,£t:_ )lt-t" . . , / c_ J(l)t·· "'.. , I · ' An.A i,1 (/ '-I''· .... c~ I ( ·' q· (..' ·~ ).l ;_. Ii l ' ,If /:/'}fl 1.,1./.f/'· tJ I, I •" / ... , i C! 'I_~• _;" '-·. tj ! ~ I .. :,. c ' ' ( ( II .· BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS MARCH 10, 1976 -7:30 P.M. ALL .DISTRICTS Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 AG EH DA (8) Consideration of roll call vote motion approvin g Joint Op erating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund accounts payable check r egiste rs for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and auth orizing payment of claims listed on page "I" ; and approving accounts payable check registers for signature of the Chairman of the respective District, and authorizing payment of said claims listed on the pages indicated below : DISTRICT 1 W0:I'1:'0:Hts, if aey ...•......•...•.•...•.•.. NO NE DISTRICT 2 warrants See page -----"II" DISTRICT 3 warrants -See page "II" DISTRICTS 3 & 11 suspeftse fURd W0:l:'l'O:Rts, if 1:my •••.• NONE DISTR.ICT 5 warrants -See page "I" DISTRICTS 5 & 6 suspeHse. fuREl wal'l'ants , if any . . . . . . NO NE DISTRICT 6 wa:rrMts , if any . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . NONE DISTRICT 7 warrants -See page __ "I_I_I_'_' _ DISTRICT 11 warrants -See page __ '_'I_I_I_"~- (13-a) Consideration of items relative to award of Sp e cification No. A-080, Six (6) 1/2 Ton Pickup Trucks (Awarded to Guaranty Chevrolet on 12/10/75): (1) Consideration of motion to -receive and f i l e letter from Guaranty Chevrolet dated February 19, 1976, withdr awin g t h eir bid on Specification No. A-080 due to an error the reon. See page "S" (2) Consideration of motion rejecting all bids received on December 2, 1975, for Specifica tion No. A-080, Six (6) 1/2 Ton Pickup Trucks (3) Considera tion of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding purchase of Six (6) 1/2 Ton Pickup Trucks, Specification No. A-080 Rebid, to Santa Ana Do dge in the amount of $26,076.00 . See pa ge "IV" DISTRICT 2 (14-a) Consideration of r e quest of Director Dale T . Chaput, Councilman, City of Yorba Linda, dated March 3, 1976, to reconsider Resolution No. 76-12-2 establishing the compensation and expense reimbursement policies for Directors, adopted by the· Board at the regul a r meeting on February 11, 19 76. See page "V" (14-b) Consideration of request of Garden Grove Sanitary District, dated March 9, 1976, regarding waiver of sewer connection fees. See page "VI" '· -2- 'WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 28905 28906 ~8907 ~908 ~0909 28910 28911 28912 28913 28911.l 28915 28916 28917 28918 28919 28920 28921 28922 28923 28924 28925 28926 28927 28928 28929 28930 28931 28932 28933 28934 28935 28936 28937 28938 28939 28940 2891.ll 28942 28943 28944 .28945 28946 28947 28948 28949 28950 28951 28952 28953 28954 28955 ?B956 ~957 20958 "I-1" A & S Building Maintenance Co., Janitorial Service ALZ Industrial Pump Division, Pump Repair Acme Canvas Products, Test Materials Air California, Air Fare, Various Meetings .Airdraulic, Pump Parts Air Seals Corporation, Engine Parts All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings, Hose & Couplings Allied Supply Company, Valves & Pipe Supplies Almquist Tool & Equipment, Hardware American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts American Controls, Valves American Cyanamid Company, Chemicals city of Anaheim, Power Anaheim Sewer Construction, Lateral Repair The Anchor Packing Co., Pump Packing V. B. Anderson Co., Tools Anixter Purzan, Hardware N. T. Bailey, JPL Lockers Bank of America, Bond & Coupon Collection Banning Battery Company, Batteries Beckman Instruments, Controls John G. Bell Co., Barscreen Parts Better Rents, Equipment Rental Black & Decker Mfg. Co., Equipment Parts Blower Paper Company, Tape Boyle Engineering Corp., Plant 2 Facilities Plan Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment exams CS Company, Valves & Pump Parts CWPCA, Safety Seminar Registration Cadillac Plastic & Chemical Co., Plexiglas Cal-State Seal Company, Gasket Material Cal's Cameras, Photo Processing & Supplies Calif. Asso~iation of Sanitary Agencies, Workshop Registration California Collator Sales, Specification Supplies Carmenita Ford Truck Sales, Inc., Truck Parts R. L. Carson, Employee Mileage R. B. Clapp Co., Inc., Controls Clark Dye Hardware, Tools Coast Nut & Bolt Co., Steel & Hardware College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials Consolidated Electrical Distbrs., Electric Supplies Continental Chemical Co., Chlorine Control Specialists, Inc., Regulator Parts c. W. Corum, Lateral Repair Leelon L. Cory, Employee Mileage Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa County Water District, Water County Wholesale Electric, Electric Supplies Crane·Veyor Corporation, Digester Repair Charles P. Crowley Co. , F'reight Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lao Supplies Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies Daniels Tire Service, Truck Tires C. R. Davis Supply Co., Pipe Supplies & Hose AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT 366.00 806.00 12.50 160.70 ll4.75 36.95 526.97 1,324.49 10.97 213.80 J.n5.13 9,21.ll.64 228.92 ll50.oo 380.31 109.lJ8 215.25 127 .·20 446.30 408.73 204.43 379.88 27.40 15.00 169.43 8,500.00 13.00 874.54 97.50 73.61 64.08 288.42 200.00 170.lJO 36.38 11.40 778.76 33.92 110.31 77.17 702.72 3,097.10 341. 94 400.00. 5.25 580.37 6.oo 149.20 2,500.00 10.35 40.00 178.76 169.39 1,030.04 "I-1" WARRANT NO. 28959 28960 28961 28962 28963 28964 28965 .28966 2tl967 28968 28969 28970 28971 28972 28973 28974 28975 28976 28977 28978 28979 28980 28981 28982 28983 28984 28985 28986 28987 28988 28989 28990 28991 28992 ·28993 .. 28994 28995 28996 28997 28998 28999 29000 29001 29002 29003 29004 29005 29006 29007 29008 29009 29010 29011 29012 29013 29014 "l-2" IN FAVOR OF Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling $ Diamond-Newport Ice Co., Sampling Supplies Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies & Printing Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Services Fibre Glass Evercoat Co., Inc., Freight Fischer & Porter Company, Instrument Supplies & Charts -Fluid Tech, Regulator City of Fountain Valley, Water Compressor Products Division, Compressor Repair City of Fullertnn, Water General Electric Supply, Electric Supplies General Telephone Company Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage Goldenwest Fertilizer Co., Grit Removal GOodyear Tire Center, Truck Tires M. E. Gray Co., Valves & Hardware Graybar Electric Company, Electric Supplies Hanson's Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies Charles G. Hardy, Inc., Hardware Harrington Industrial Plastics, Pipe Supplies Michael Heinz, Employee Mileage Hennig, Inc., Truck Repair Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease Hilti Fastening Systems, Hardware Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires Honeywell, Inc., Strip Charts Hopper Service Parts Co., Truck Parts Howard Supply Company, Hardware, Tools & Pipe Supplies City of Huntington Beach, Water IDS Corporation, Office Supplies Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Freight International Harvester Co., Truck Parts Irvine Ranch Water District, Water J & M Service, Equipment Parts Jensen Instrument Company, Controls Keenan Pipe &·supply Company, Pipe Supplies King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, V-Belts & Pump Parts Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware L. A. Dodge Construction News, Legal Notice P2-23 LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tools & Tool Repair L & N Uniforms Supply Co., Uniform Service The Lacal Company, Inc., Pump Packing Lakewood Pipe Service, Freight Larsen-Hogue Electric, Electric Supplies Lawson Products, Inc., Hardware Lewco Electric Company, Truck Repair McCoy Ford Tractor, Equipment & Tractor Parts McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Tools, Gauges & Hardware Master Blueprint & Supply, Blueprints & Printing Morgan Equipment Company, Equipment Parts Motorola, Inc., Communication Equipm~nt Nalco Chemical Company, Chemicals National Chemsearch, 8olvent & Cleaner National Lumber Supply, Building Materials AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT 295.00 15.90 703.95 3,000.00 12."C) 478 .'-1( 291.67 40.00 70.00 6.08 2,985.41 1,876.91 43. 26 1,296.00 182.32 448.67 38.03 57.20 109.56 418. 55 4.20 175.51 743.51 169.60 357.94 58.12 30.43 3,370.98 144.35 224.64 8.50 8.14 1.75 20.99 68. 74 66.11 173.24 584.32 251.38 48.34 330.00 579.53 1,973.29 538.91 17.93 255.16 47. 24. 51.82 234.92 644.21 46.06 67 .. 76 198.72 1,280.52 1, 182.) 68.~ "l-2" . WARRANT NO. 29015 29016 29017 29018 ".>(}020 IN FAVOR OF City of Newport Beach, Water Nolex Corporation, Reproduction Supplies Office Equipment Specialists, Equipment Repair Orange County Water District, Replenishment Tax Orange Valve & F~tting Co., Hardware · Overhead Door Company, Warehouse Doors ·Pacific Telephone C9mpany M. c. Patten Corporation, Gauges Petroleum Dynamics, Pump Parts Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies Tom Ponton, Inc., Pump Parts Printec Corporation, Reproduction Supplies Quality Building Supply, Building Materials Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal The Register, NPDES Notice, Bid Notice 11-lR-l The Republic Supply Co., Pipe Supplies Richey Electronics, Inc., Electric Supplies Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts & Pump Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing AMOUNT 485.09 1,062.01 58.27 431.20 10.55 2,045.80 452.12 252.08 4.90 691.99 27.85 288.43 533.70 64.oo & Su~scription 171.56 249.37 462.83 4,840.20 57.18 348.12 ~021 29022 29023 29024 29025 29026 29027 29028 29029 29030 29031 29032 29033 29034 29035 29036 .. Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motor & Motor Repair Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies · -eo·.75-· ~ 29037 . 29038-- 29039 29040 29041 29042 29043 29044 29045 29046 29047 29048 29049 29050 29051 29052 29053 29054 29055 29056 29057 29058 29059 .29060 29061 29062 29063 29064 29065 29066 29067 29068 29069 ':'<1070 ___.-071 "l-3" Scientific Products, Lab Supplies ··seal Methods,·rnc., Gaskets See Optics, Safety Glasses s. F. Serrantino, Employee Mileage Shepherd Machinery Co., Equipment Parts Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies John Sigler, Employee Mileage Signal-Flash Company, Barricade Rental Southern California Edison Company South Orange Supply, Pipe Supplies Southern California Gas Company Southern California Water Company Sparkletts Drinking Water Corporation, Bottled Water Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Oil Company of.Calif., Gasoline & Diesel Fuel Sterling Art & Engineering Supply, Drafting Supplies Surveyor's Service Company, Tools . T-Girl Temporary Employment, Temporary Warehouse Help Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage & Water Conf .· Expense c. O. Thompson Petroleum Co., Kerosene Trexler Compressor, Inc., Compressor Parts Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts Tustin Water Works, Water Union Oil Company of Calif., Gasoline United Parcel Service, Freight-out United Reprographics, Inc., Industrial Waste Ord. Printing United States Elevator Corp., Maintenance Agreement University of Calif., Irvine Regents, JPL Computer Model Van Waters & Rogers, Chemicals VWR Scientific, Test Supplies Varec~ Inc., Freight Wallace & Tiernan, Chlorinator Parts Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage 'John R. Waples, R.s., Odor Consultant Waste King Universal, Equipment Repair AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS 24.59 .. :to3 ~-62---. . . 29.68 22.50 74.02 494.90 12.75 98.50 47,562.49 125.45 1,833.12 . . 3.24 165.57 234.11 ·4,868.42 51.64 32.35 166.88 102.00 198.78 891.41 966.55 167-.09 11.36 32.94 1,618.21 33.00 247 .46 2,599.72 103.10 10.25 437 .!to 43.50 212.90 27.50 "l-3" r WARRANT NO. 29072 29073 29074 29075 29076 29077 29078 28877 28878 28879 28886 28881 . 28882 28883 28884 28885 28886 28887 "28888 28889 28890 28891 28892 28893 28894 28895 28896 28897 28898 28899 28900 28901 28902 28903 28904 "I-4" IN FAVOR OF Western Wholesale Company, Equipment Parts Wilson Ford Sales, Truck Parts Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Services Everett H. York Company, Filters Zodiac Paper Company, Printing Supplies. TOTAL JOINT OPERATING CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF $ $ ·AMOUNT 32.59 189.53 5,101.50 27.18 1,457 -~ 202. :n 52.53 146,549.63 Analytical Measurements, PH Recorder $ 969.00 4,134.oo Calgon Corp., Activated Carbon for ACTS John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Serv., ACTS, Fae. Plan & J-6-1 County Sanitation Dist. 2 of L. A., Solids Management Daily Pilot, Bid Notice A-080 Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16 Envirotech-Sparling, Carbon Analysis Elwood H. Fairchild, JPL Consultant J. B. Gilbert & Associates, Fae. Plan & P2-23 EIR J. Putnam Henck, Contractor, JPL-ACTS Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Management Pl-16 Howard Supply Company, Pipe Instrument Specialj_st Company, JPL Programmer Motorola, Inc., Mobile Radio & Communication Equipment Olympic Signs, JPL Signs Pepsi Co. Bldg. Systems, Inc.: JPL Equipment Rental c. E. Raymond/Bartlett-Snow, JPL Kiln The Register, Bid Notice PW-049 Rockwell International, Calculator Thomas·J. Rush, Lathe Sales Engineers Limited, Polymer Tank ·Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Incubator Smith Emery Company, Testing Pl-16 Jack R. Strobel, MAI, Plant 2 Land Appraisal Taylor Instruments, JPL Flowmeters Twining Laboratories, Concrete Test Up-Right Scaffolds, Scaffolding Wyle Laboratories, Cqnsultant Pl-16 TOTAL CORF TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS ·-25,473.48 65,000.00 9.11 795,809.43 9,808.03 276.00 6,708.27 238,862.87 12,484.51 1,419. 34 72·0.80 2,483.63 530.00 861·.86 195,000.00 97.00 213.27 9,795.10 4,629.78 3,194.84 52.00 650.00 29,906.40 15.00 3Lt5. 56 532.00 $ 1,409,981.28 $ 1,556,530.91 . "-" "l-4" DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS t~T NO. IN FAVOR OF 28854 Precision Anodizing, Refund IW Permit Overpayment ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 28855 A.T. & S.F. Railroad Company, Santa Ana River Interceptor Payments 28856 John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contractor 2-14-3 28857 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 2-15 28858 J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation, Contractor 2-15 28859 Kasler Corp. & L.H. Woods, JV., Contractor 2-14-4 28860 Kraemer IV, Easement 2-17-1 28861 Long Beach Iron Works, Inc., Contractor 2-14-4 28862 Lowry and Associates, Engineering Services 2-15, 2-17-2 28S63"'Smith Emery Company, Pipe· Testing 2-14-3, 2-14-4, 2-14-5 28864 S.S. Zarubica, Contractor 2-14-5 DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 28865 Los Alamitos General Hospital, Refund IW Permit Overpayment ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF ·28866 Boyle Engineering Corp., Engineering Services 3-20, 3-20-1, 3-21-2 28867 County of Orange, Compaction Testing, 3-2_0-l, 3-20-2, 3-21-1 28868 Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing, 3-20-1, 3-20-2 28869 Southern California Testing Laboratory, Soils Testing 3-21-1 28870 Sully-Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 3-20-1 28871 A.G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N.M. Saliba Co., Contractor 3-20-2 "11-1" AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS Af.l:lUNT $ 73.32 $ 300.00 30,297.60 80.89 27,740.48 795,447.00 23,750.00 162.18 3,048.00 3,796.00 33,693.61 $ 918,315.76 $ 918,389.08 $ 17.50 $ 12,997.00 339.54 962.00 72.00 287,953.60 353,477.00 $ 655, 801.14 $ 655,818.64 "11-1" WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 28872 City of Newport Beach, Connection Fee Administration "II-2" AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMO--f 524.75 "11-2" r DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS W~T NO •. IN FAVOR OF 28873 Local Agency Formation Commission, Annexation #53 Processing Fee 28874 Shelton & Associates, Right-of-Way Appraisal FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 28875 Irvine Industrial Complex, Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement DISTRICT NO. 11 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 28876 Clifford L. Thompson Construction Co., Contractor ll-4R "III" AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMOUNT 25.00 499.50 $ 524.50 $ 119, 806. 27 $ 120,330.77 $ 10,627.25 "III" "IV" .• BID TABULATION SHEET Date .. Contract For: SIX (6) 1/2 TON PICKUP TRUCKS . SPECIFICATION NO. A-080 REBID .. BIDDER 1 •. Santa Ana J?odge Santa Ana 2. Guaranty Chevrolet Motors Santa Ana 3. Wegge Dodge Pasadena 4. Wilson Ford Huntington Beach 5. Tiieodore Robbins, Inc. Costa Mesa 6. McCoy & Mi 11 s Ford Fullerton 7. Smith-Ford Garden Grove 8. McCoy Ford Anaheim 9. El Camino Ford San Clemente 10. Birch Ford La Habra 11. Peck Road Ford Truck Sales Whittier March 9, 1976 11:00 a.m~ TOTAL BID $ 26,076.00 26",508.99 26,563.68 26,615.39 27,030.00 27,248.21 27,506.75 27,609.72 27, 717 .45 28,492.80 29,499.02 It is recommended that award be made to Santa Ana Dodge, 1401 North Tustin Ave., Santa Ana, CA, in the amount ·of $26,076.00 as the lowest and best bid. v11e~ W. N. Clarke Superintendent AGENDA ITEM #13(A)(3) -ALL DISTRICTS II IV" CITY OF YORBA LINDA 0 Telephone .524-5000 Poat Offico Box A • 4845 M•ln Street • Yorb• Lind•, C•lifomia 92606 March 3, 1976 Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District No. 2 Post Off ice Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Directors: This letter is being submitted to all Orange County cities as well as the Sanitation Districts which make up District No. 2 due to various improprieties which occurred at a recent Orange County Sanitation District meeting. I am greatly concerned that a group of elected officials,"once removed from the voting public by a special taxing district, have chosen to increase their salaries and allowed unlimited expenses through the secre.tive tactic of a voice vote. In this regard I challenge the legality of the Resolution authorizing salaries and expenses because of the irregular process in which it was adopted. I therefore request that Sanitation District No. 2 void the previous action taken on Resolution 76-12-2 and reconsider it at the March 10, 1976 meeting. Among the irregularities: 1) The Joint Chairman faila:Ito follow his· own announced procedures. 2) District No. 2 Chairman did not conduct the meeting nor call for the roll call vote. 3)· No roll call vote was taken although legal counsel indicated that that was the proper procedure. 4) A request from the floor for a roll call vote was denied by the District No. 2 Chairman, Mr. Callahan. Attached is Exhibit "A", a summary of the events which took place at the February meeting. In view of these events, I strongly urge reconsideration of Resolution No. 76-12-2 and specifically request a roll call vote. Sincerely, p ~~ --?-eA7-.~f Dale T. Chaput, Councilman City of Yorba Linda * * * * BIRTHPLACE OF RICHARD NIXON -37th PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES * * ** "V-1" AGENDA ITEM #14(A) -DISTRICT 2 "V-1" , , "V-2" EXHIBIT "A" During the January Joint Meeting Resolution 76-11~1 was presented by the Executive Committee proposing to increase the compensation and reimbursements for Directors expenses. Since some Directors did not believe the increases were appropriate they requested that the item be continued to the February meeting so they could consult with their Councils. At the February meeting the item was reconsidered by each District and voted on. My complaint relates to the manner in which this voting occurred. The Joint Chairman announced at the beginning of this agenda item, that each district would consider this item separately and that each District Chairman would preside over the proceeding for his District. This fonnat was followed in District #1 and a roll call vote was called to settle the matter. However, when District #2 took up the matter, discussion was generally chaired by the Joint Chairman and not the District Chainnan .. After the discussion the Joint Chairman, with some anxiety, called for a voice vote instead of a roll call vote, even though he had been advised by general counsel that a roll callvote was in order. I talked to the Joint Chairman prior to taking a new agenda item requesting that a roll call vote be taken. In order not to interrupt the proceedings of the other Dist~icts, he suggested we do it in the other business category on the agenda prior to District #2's adjournment. At this point in the agenda he refused to call the roll call vote and turned the meeting over to Mike Callahan, Chairman of District #2 who had not chaired the original voice vote. Mike refused to allow the roll call vote, thus due process was circumvented and power politics was at it's worst. When a Director votes himself a raise he should be willing to record his vote and not hide behind a voice vote. This is both unethical and illegal and gives the public more reasons to suspect their elected officials. AGENDA ITEM #14(A) -DISTRICT 2 "V-2" ., 11391 ACACIA PARKWAY, P. O. BOX 1437 • JEFFERSON 4·3943 • GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA 92642 March 9, 1976 County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 . · Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Dear Fred: Fred Harper, General Manager The Sanitary District is in the process of forming a Special Assessment District under the Street Improvement Act of 1911 or 1913 for the purpose of financing the construction of sewers to serve 21 homes constructed in Garden Grove on Ranchero Way and Ranchero Place in 1952. While reviewing the cost of this project, it was noted that the County Sanitation District fees totaled $4620, which represents over 46% of the estimated construction cost of $10,000. Because this is a low income. neighborhood, the combina- tion of construction costs, fees, and incidental expenses would create an unusual financial hardship on the residents which may ultimately lead them to abandon the project; there- fore, after considering that these residents have been paying 'taxes to the County Sani ta ti on District for a number of years without receiving any direct benefits, the Board of Directors of the Garden Grove Sanitary District voted unanimously at their last meeting to request the County Sanitation District to waive the connection fee of $220.00 per unit. In keeping with its policy· to minimize the sewer connec- tion expenses to the users whenever unusual costs are incurred by them, the Sanitary District expects to waive its Sewer Service Use Fee. Your consideration in this matter will be appreciated. BP/bf BOARD OF DIRECTORS ROBERT H. MAIN, P"r:31or:H1'; WALTER M. BRESSEL, 6EeRETARV; DR. SHELDON S. SINGER: NORMAN E. CULVER; F!OBERT PERRY "VI II AGENDA ITEM #14(B) -DISTRICT 2 "V.I II RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS MARCH 10) 1976 -7:30 P.M. II A" : ~-"~-~"}) City of Huntington Beach • ~"t :3;.~ P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ~ l~ jj ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT February 18, 1976 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8217 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer Subject: Brookhurst Street Improvements Gentlemen: Reference is made to your letter of January 13, 1976, which covers proposed work on Brookhurst Street adjacent to Treatment Plant No. 2. We are in agreement with the split in the scope of work to be paid by the District and the City, with the exception that the structural section should be increased from 3" A.C. over 10" A.B. to 4" A.C. over 12" A.B. Accordingly the cost of the work items to be paid by the District will amount to approximately $200,000.00, and those items to be paid by the City will amount to approximtely $53,000.00. It is assumed you will receive and review a minimum of three bids and give us an opportunity to review same. I intend to present this proposal to the City Council at the meeting of March 1, 1976. Very truly yours, ~~ Director of Public Works HEH:ae AGENDA ITEM #9(A) -ALL DISTRICTS II A" RESOLUTION NO. 76-41 MAKING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE THEREOF, AND APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NO. P2-8-8 A RESOLUTION OF Tiffi BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, MAKING A NEGATiVE DECLARATION AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE THEREOF, AND APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR BROOKHURST STREET IMPROVE- MENTS, JOB NO. P2-8-8 * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the project concerning which this determination is made is described as follows: Brookhurst Street Improvements, Job No. P2-8-8 Section 2. That, whereas, an initial study and an Environmental Impact Assessment, which said assessment is attached hereto as Exhibit "A", of the environmental effects of said project has been undertaken and completed by the Districts, and the results thereof have been reviewed by this Board; and, Section 3. That, for the following reasons it is hereby found that said project will not have a significant effect on the environment: (a) There is no conflict with environmental plans and the goals that have been adopted by the City of Huntington Beach where the project is located. (b) The project will have no substantial detrimental affects on air or water quality. (c) The completed project will be beneficial inasmuch as it will help protect the safety of the pedestrian and vehicular traffic on Brookhurst Street and aid in the collection and proptr disposal of flood waters; and, "B-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "B-1" Section 4. lbat the detailed plans, specifications, and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Clifford A. Forkert, Civil Engineer, Districts' Engineer for construction of said proj~ct, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section S. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 6. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m., April 6, 1976, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 7. That the Secretary and the Districts' Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors; and, Section 8. Th.at the Secretary be, ,and is hereby authorized and instructed to file a certified copy of this resolution and of the aforesaid initial study at the Districts' office to be available for public inspection and copying; and, Section 9. Th.at County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized to award contract for said Job No. P2-8-8 on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 10, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #9(B) -ALL DISTRICTS ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALtfORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9/7 1'l8 (71.C) 5.C0-2910 (7 l .C) 962-2.C l 1 March 4, 1976 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Name of Project: Brookhurst Street Improvements, Job No. P2-8-8 Location: 22212 Brookhurst St., Huntington Beach Entity or Person Undertaking Project: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Staff Determination The District's staff, having undertaken and completed an initial study of this project in accordance with Section 31 of the District's guidelines entitled "Local Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Amended", for the purpose of ascertaining whether the proposed project might have a significant effect on the environment, has reached the following conclusion: "B-3" The project could not have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, a negative declaration should be prepared. AGENDA ITEM #9(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "B-3" II C" RESOLUTION NO. 76-42 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR ,JOB NO. PW-049 A RESOLlITION OF TIIE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR NEW WATER WELL NO. 1 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-049 I I * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, ·DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer, that award ~f contract be made to McCalla Bros. for NEW WATER WELL NO. 1 AT PLANT NO. l, JOB"NO. PW-049, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for said Job No. PW-049 be awarded to ~kCalla Bros. in the total amount of $42,046.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and'that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders; and, Section 4. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized to award contract for said Job No. PW-049 on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5 , 6 , 7 , and 11. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 10, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #9(c) -ALL DISTRICTS II C" "D" Engineer's Estimate: $50,000.00 BID TABULATION SHEET Date March 2, 1976 -11:00 A.M. Contract For: .NEW WATER WELL NO. 1 AT PLANT NO. 1 1. 2. 3. 4. 5 • . 6. 8. 9. 10. JOB NO. PW-049 CONTRACTOR McCall a Bros. .Santa Ana Baylek Drilling, Inc. La Habra AGENDA ITEM #9(c) -ALL DISTRICTS TOTAL BID $42,046.00 $44,580.00 "D" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. ____ l~~----------~~ CO~ACTOR: SKIPPER & COMPANY DATE ~larch 3, 1976 -----------~---------~~----------------~---------------------------~--- JOB: Installation of Foul Air Treatment at Plant Number 2, Headworks "C", Job No. PW-050 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ o.oo In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from. the contr~ct price are hereby appr~ved. Revise insurance requirements for job. Public Liability and Property Damage One person· More than one person Property damage Motor Vehicle Pub lie Liability and Property Damage One person More than one person Property damage Specified requirements were excessive for job of this size. Originally Specified Changed to $i,ooo,ooo $3,000,000 ·$ 500, 000 $ 200,000 $ 500,000 $ 100,000 $ 300,000 $1,000,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 300,000 $ 100,000 Original Contract Price $ 14 7, 969. 00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ _______ o_._o_o __ ~--~ $ 0.00 ------------------This Change (ADD) (DE DUCT) Amended Contract Price $ 147,969.00 Board authorization date: March 10, 1976 Approved: By -------------------~--~~~~~--Cons u J ting Engineer By ------------------------------------Contractor COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California By------------------~~--.:-:-:-~~~-Ch i e f Enyir:ecr II E" AGENDA ITEM #9(n) -ALL DISTRICTS II E" II F" CITY OF SANT A ANA DEPARTMENT OF PLJRLIC \VORKS (714) 834 ... 4931 .20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA • SANTA ANA • CALIFORNIA 92701 ·, Mr. Ray Lewis County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Ray: SUBJECT: RAITT STREET SEWER February 23, 1976 Last October a meeting was held at your offices to discuss the timing for the construction of the Raitt Street sewer trunk northerly from Sunflower Avenue. At the meeting it was agreed that the City would establish a precise plan for the alignment of Raitt Street between Sunflower Avenue and Alton Avenue so that the District would be able to commence the design of the trunk line and possibly acquire the necessary sewer easement across the presently un ... developed properties if the actual dedication and improvement of the roadway appeared to be delayed till further in the future. The precise alignment for Raitt Street has now been determined. The actual adoption of this align- ment by the City Council requires the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and a public hearing procedure as required by City code. However, I am enclosing for your information a copy of the precise alignment so that your staff might commence on preliminary activities at this time and not have to wait for the formal adoption of the alignment by the City Council. We have been in contact with the Segerstroms regarding this alignment and have heard no objections. We are presently in the process of preparing the Environmental Impact Report and it is felt that the precise alignment can be fully adopted by the first of May of this year. It is requested that the District take the necessary actions to budget for the construction of this trunk line and establish an early schedule for the implementation of the project. Encl: Copy of Precise Alignment AGENDA ITEM #9(F) -DISTRICT 1 II F" \;VVl'Cl I ~/\1'4.l. lf\I J.UN Ul~ lt<lt.I~ Ut-Ut<AN(.Jt: COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAI.N VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER KASLER CORPORATION & C.O. N0. ___ 3~~----~~~~~--- cor !ACTOR: L. H. WOODS & SONS, INC. DAT.E March 4, 1976 '-"' JOB: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH 5, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) {DEDUCT) $ o.oo In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as co~pensation therefor, the following additions to ·or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Provide standard prestressed reinforced concrete pipe in lieu of standard reinforced concrete pipe. The Contractor has elected to use the transition with D-load pipe as an alternate provided for in the detailed specificatons. ·. No cost to the District. Any additional cost shall be borne by the contractor. No time extension this change order. Change order approved by· State on February 6,, 1976. Original Contract Price $ 4,240,957.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ (5, 180. 00) This Change (ADD) (DE DUCT) $ o.oo Amended Contract Price $ 4,235,777«00 3oard authorization date: March 10,, 1976 App roved: 3y_ Consulting Engineer 3y -------------------------------~----ContrcJctor COUNTY SANiTATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California By --------------------~~~~~~-Chic f Engineer II G" AGENDA ITEM #9(G) -DISTRICT 2 II G" II H II RESOLUTION NO. 76-43-2 AUlllORTZING EXECUTION OF PIPE-LINE LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE ATCllISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY FOR RIGHT OF WAY RE CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTIIORIZING EXECUTION OF A PIPE-LINE LICENSE AGREEMENT WIIB THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY FOR RIGHT OF WAY IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR AND SOUTH SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONNECTOR, REACHES 2, 3 AND 4, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3 ~ * * * * * * * *· * * Tile Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. Tilat the certain Pipe Line License Agreement, dated June 26, 1975, wherein The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company grants to County Sanitation District No. 2 the right to construct the Santa Ana River Interceptor and South Santa Ana River Interceptor Connector, Reaches 2, 3 and 4, Contract No. 2-14-3, through the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company right of way in La Palma Avenue, easterly of Grove Street, .is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment in the amount of $150.00 for use of said right of way is hereby authorized; and, Section 3. Tirnt the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 10, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #9(H) -DISTRICT 2 II H II II I II RESOLUTION NO. 76-44-2 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF PIPE-LINE LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA J\J\JD SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY FOR RIGHT OF WAY RE CONTRACT NO. 2-14-5 A RESOLlITION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A PIPE-LINE LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY FOR RIGl-IT OF WAY IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACHES 6, 7 AND 8, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-5 * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Pipe Line License Agreement, dated September 8, 1975, wherein The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company grants to County Sanitation District No. 2 the right to construct the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Reaches 6, 7 and 8, Contract No. 2-14-5, through the Atchison, Top~ka and Santa Fe Railway Company right of way near the Green River Golf Course at the Orange County-San Bernadino County line, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment in the amount of $150.00 for use of said right of way is hereby authorized; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 10, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #9(1) -DISTRICT 2 II I II "J-1" C. MICHAEL, INC. • • DUILDER.B AND DlCVIDLO~ER.0 P.O. BOX 878 • a CSOl DOLS A AVE .• MIDWAY CITY, CALIF. g a a l5 l5 PHONES• (714) B9:3·Sl530 • (BlS) 430-t5l517 • (714) CsS4·C5498 February 9, 1976 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 District No. 2 Re: Pe ti ti on for l\nnexation to O.C.S.D. No. 2 Gen tlernen: We hereby request annexation of the herein described property to Sanitation District No. 2. Submitted herewith is the following information pertaining to our petition for annexation to said District No. 2. 1. Legal Description -(see attached) 2. Map -(see attached) 3. 4. Name (a) of Record Owner: C . Mi ch a e 1 , Inc . 8501 Bolsa Avenue Midway City, California 893-3536 Note: The above named company will be owner of Record prior to completion of annexation proceedings. Their interest in said property will be 100%. (b) Number of people residing on said property = None Assessed Valuation: There are 3 parcels annexation a~ shown Assessors No. (a)# 351-021-27 (b)# 351-031-12 (c)# 351-031-07 within the Boundary of the proposed on the latest Assessors Map 'Book, Latest Assessed Valuation $171,250.00 $121,500.00 $ 42,750.00 Total Assessed Valuation $335,500.00 5. Area to be annexed= 295.87 Acres .--....: ,,· ,,.---r \..._. . ~-·" ( ... /?' ~ '------ By: C. M~· chae1: /Jones -President . / C. Michae . cornorated aw AGENDA ITEM #£(K) -DISTRICT 2 "J-1" 1<·~ .. __ I I I i I I • I 11 · •• :--...... • I _L~ --•••• ,.____.I ..... "J-2" , f oro e:t? C. Ii I GH A L-l ~ · -2c 5 .. 87 c: . A tJE.XA ION -~· ® AGENDA ITEM #9(K) -DISTRICT 2 .-· . . . , . I ' . .·· .. ·- "J-2" II K" RESOLUTION NO. 76-45-3 AUTimRI ZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY RE CONTRACT NO. 3-21-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTI SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTI, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS- PORTATION COMPANY IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THE WESTSIDE RELIEF INTER- CEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 27 AND REACHES 28 AND 29, CONTRACT NO. 3-21-2 * * * * * * * * ·* * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated March 10, 1976, wherein Southern Pacific Transportation Company grants to County Sanitation District No. 3 the right to construct the Westside Relief Interceptor, Portion of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 and 29, Contract No. 3-21-2, through Southern Pacific Trans- portation Company right of way in the vicinity of Moody Street, northerly of Katella Avenue, is hereby approved and accepted; .and, Section 2. That use of said right of way is at no cost to the District; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 10, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #9(L) -DISTRICT 3 II K" II L" RESOLUTION NO. 76-46 APPROVING AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. 11-lR-1 A RESOLlJfION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY-SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 3 AND 11 or ORANGE COUNTY' CALffORNIA, APPROVING AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR MANHOLE REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR, CONTRACT NO. 11-lR-1 * * * * * * * * * * TI1e Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11 of Orange County, California., DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief EngiI?eer, that award of contract be made to Rewes-Schock for MANHOLE REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR, CONTRACT NO. 11-lR-1, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That award of contract to Rewes-Schock in the total amount of $37,253.00, in accordance with the terms of their· bid ru1d the prices contained therein, be approved; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of District No. 3, acting for itself and as agent for District No. 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and siv1 a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor; and, Section 4. Tirnt all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 10, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #9CN) -DISTRICTS 3 & 11 II L II "M" B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N SHEET Engineer's Estimate: $45,000. Date March 2, 1976 -11:00 A.M. Contract For: MANHOLE REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR NEWLAND-DELAWARE TRUNK 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 8. 9. 10. CONTRACT NO. 11-lR-l CONTRACTOR Rewes-Schock Santa Ana George Miller Construction Company Los Angeles TOTAL BID $37,253,00 AGENDA ITEM #9(N) -DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "M" "N" RESOLUTION NO. 76-47-7 AU'JHORI ZING ACCEPTANCE OF DI RECTOR'S DEED RE CONTRACT NO. 7-1 A RESOLUTION OF 111E BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTIIORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF DIRECTOR'S DEED FROM STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, RE CONTRACT NO. 7-1 * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of Cotmty Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, ·DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Director's Deed dated December 23, 1975, wherein the State of California, Department of Transportation, grants to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent grant deed of certain excess properties adjacent to the San Diego Freeway and abutting the District's easement for the Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-l, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the real property conveyed by said Director's Deed is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits 11 A11 and 11 B11 attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, · Section 3. That said Director's Deed is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to record said Director's Deed in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 10, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #9(o) -DISTRICT 7 "NII "O" RESOLlITION NO. 76-48-7 AUTHORIZING EXECITTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH SOU'IllERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY RE CONTRACT NO. 7-6-7 A RESOLlITION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECfORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT wrm SOlfTIIERN PACIFIC TRANSPOR- TATION COMPANY IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF TI-IE TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, REACH 11 AND PORTION OF REACH 12, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-7 * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of Collllty Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, Califo111ia, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated January 21, 1976, wherein the Southe111 Pacific Transportation Company grants to County Sanitation District No. 7 the right to construct the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 11 and Portion of Reach 12, Contract No. 7-6-7, through Southern Pacific Transportation Company right of way in the vicinity of Irvine Boulevard and Newport Avenue, northerly to Seventeenth Street, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payments in the amounts of $40, 000. 00 for permanent right of way, and $3,086.25 for temporary right of way, are hereby authorized; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District in form approved by the General Cotmsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 10, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #9(p) -DISTRICT 7 "O" "P-1" February 27, 1976 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Request for Annexation Gentlemen: I, the owner of the property located at 21252 Santiago Canyon Road, do herePy request annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. ,-' -:QJ /l /(} . h/. ·/_,r:;1rtlM -~Vji Mrs. Donald Cray · 21252 Santiago Canyon Road Orange, California 92669 AGENDA ITEM #9(R) -DISTRICT 7 "P-1" ( r· . . ..__-------'\·--_ CITYOFO~G8,t?aJr-JD6t~Y -·--····---·· --·---·· ; .· J _. ~ o~t-k::>t::. S8.WE.¥'.Jf.JG AG~µc '( -----· --. -----· -· -· -;, I l-. { . f 1 ~ g () ''- "P-2" .... ?? j) """'-~~ Ii •/ ~~ • • I // . . ... · ..... -··-/ ·---N - I ,.i AGENDA ITEM #9 <R) -r sTRr CT 7 :t 1{LI "P-2" i. . .1 i .• . t COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVEtWE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. N0. ___ 1 ______________ ~------ COrwRACTOR: CLIFFORD L. TH01-IPSON CONSTRUCTION cm.~PANY DATE March 4, 1976 ------~---------~~----~~ JOB: Remodel Newland-Hamil ton Pumping Station Facilities, Contract No. 11-4R Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (lllrnM~I) $1,214.95 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or c~ntr~ct work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby appr~ved. ADD: Additional two rows of block to wall and excavation and grading of entrance drive. Also extend roof vent pipe . and increase gate post size to 4~". TOfAL ADD. Extension of Contract Time .The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of 30 calendar days to accomplish the work in this change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this Change Order Total TiEe Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date Board authorization date: November 27, 1975 60 Calendar Days January 25, 1976 30 Calendar Days 30 Calendar Days 90 Calendar Days February 24, 1976 Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD) ~~'t) Amended Contract Price App roved: . $1,214.95 $1,214.95 $ 19' 821. 00 $ 0. 00 ----------~----~· $ 1,214.95 $ 21, 035. 95 March 10, 1976 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, Ca 1 i forn i a By __ ,__ __________________ ~~--~------ Con s ult in g Engineer By ___________________________ ~--------By---------------------.-~-=--~~~~ Chief Engineer Contractor "Q" AGENDA ITEM #9Cs) -DISTRICT 11 "Q" "R-1" IH\l\T IU1fli \HTEH IHSTHHT P.O. Box D-1 • 4201 Campus Dnvc •Irvine, Calif. 92664 • (714) 833-1223 Mr. Ray E. Lewis Chief Engineer March 4, 1976 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 90807 Subject: IRWD Connection to County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Ocean Outfall System Dear Mr. Lewis: 910LCC3/76 On November 17, 1975, a letter report was transmitted tq your Districts in regard to the subject project. This report outlined the basic points in the January 1972 _agreement between IRWD and CSDOC whereby IRWD purchased 15 MGD capacity in the CSDOC ocean outfall system. That agreement provides for a connection of a pipeline from IRWD to the ocean outfall surge tower at Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach. IRWD has now commenced extensive studies to investigate alternate alignments for the route of the pipeline from IRWD to the Sanitation Districts' outfall system. As a result of the studies completed to date, it is now apparent that connections to the CSDOC ocean outfall system at points other than the ocean outfall surge tower may be desirable. If a change is made in the point of connection to the CSDOC system, it will be necessary to revise the capital and annual cost payments made by IRWD to CSDOC. The costs for acquiring capacity in the CSDOC ocean outfall system were originally determined from the results of a study conducted by John Carollo Engineers dated May 24, 1971. That report estimated costs on a per unit flow basis of various components of the CSDOC system. Because of changed conditions since 1971, an updating of the May 24, 1971, carollo study is needed to more accurately reflect present day conditions. The cost of this study will be paid by IRWD under purchase orders already issued by IRWD, and at no .cost to the Sanitation Districts. It would be appreciated if you would authorize John Carollo Engineers to proceed with the study as outlined. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. LCC:dft cc: William F. Hurst Alexander Bowie S~cerely, g-~j l~( -~:~;11-~---.. - ·· Lloyd c. Corf el t Director -Engineering & Planning Don J. Martinson, Lowry & Associates AGENDA ITEM #11 -ALL DISTRICTS "R-1" FORCE MAIN ELLIS AVENUE ~SAN.~o \..JO DISTRICTJ 00 00 NO •. J -4--- O.C.W. D. WATER FACTORY 21 ADAMS AVENUE 42" JOS -15 m.g.d.~ 6611 INTERPLANT- 56 m.g.d. -- 8411 INTER PLANT - 90.m.g.d. SANITATION STRICT . LANT NO. 2 0 . 00 ° Ooo II R-2" VICTORIA STREET PUMP STATION POINT OF CONNECTION OUTFALL SURGE TOWER OUTFALL -480 m.g.d. 78 11 OCEAN OUTFALL -240 m.g.d. AGENDA ITEM #11 -ALL DISTRICTS L•flf,.•11(1) ''' LOWRY AND ASSOCl~TfS 1)1 l•\l •A1.,lifltGTC .. &vi .... 'UU ~4 • C.AL•li:l_,..IA •1104 "R-2" "S" Director of Finance County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: February 19, 1976 In checking our quotation on your specification #A-080 and your Purchase Order #30177, we find that we have made an error in our bid. In preparing our specification, the automatic transmission that you requested was not priced out in our computation. As a result, we are unable to deliver at the price quoted. We request that our offer be withdrawn and your purchase order cancelled. In recomputing our costs, we would find it necessary to increase our price per unit by $213.00 per unit to make delivery. We are willing to do this if we can receive an amendment to the purchase order. Although this increase would result in a no-profit deal to us, we would be willing to deliver the units because this deviation was due to our error. This would result in an amended bid price as follows: Unit Price 6 Units Sales Tax $4,118.08 each TOTAL $24,709.48 1,482.52 $26,192.00 If this is not possible, we would respectfully and regretfully request the withdrawal of our bid and hope that we will continue to have the opportllllity to quote on your transportation needs. BC:brn Sincerely, ~/;) : /. '· •• ,. J ·. l" -~·-.... ·,..__ ~.._.vi.. .-k~ '--t. Bob Creedon Fleet Sales Manager AGENDA IlEM #13(A) Cl)-ALL DISTRICTS 711EASl171H srnm. SANTA ANA. CALIF-Of<NIA 92701. (714) 543-9311 II s II ORDINANCE NO. 509 AN ORDINANCE OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. SOS, AS AMENDED, AND ORDINANCE NO. 508, PERTAINING TO CONNECTION CHARGES The Board of Directors of Cotmty Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1: Section (a) of Article 6 of Ordinance No. 505, as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows: "(a) District Connection Charges. Before any connection permit shall be issued, the applicant shall pay to the District, or its agent, the charges specified herein. (1) Connection Charge for New Construction, Family Dwelling Buildings. For each new family dwelling building constructed, the connection charge shall be $250 per dwelling unit. (2) Connection Charge for New Construction, Other Than Family Dwelling Buildings. For all other new construction, including but not limited to commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the connection charge shall be $130 per 1000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $130. (3) Connection Charge for Replacement Buildings. For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in Paragraphs (1) and (2) hereinabove. If such replacement construction is commenced within two years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed, calculated on the basis of the current connection charge applicable for the new construction "T-1" AGENDA ITEM #20 -DISTRICT 5 "T-1" "T-3" Section 3. Section 402 of Ordinance No. 508 is hereby amended to read: "402. DISTRICT NO. 5 CONNECTION CHARGES 1. District Connection Charges· Before any connection permit shall be issued, the applicant shall pay to the District, or its agent, the charges specified herein. (a) Connection charges for new construction, family dwelling buildings. For each new family dwelling building constructed, the connection charge shall be $250 per dwelling unit. (b) Connection charge _for new construction, other than family dwelling buildings. For all other new construction, including but not limited to commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the connection charges shall be $130 per 1000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the_minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $130. (c) Connection charge for replacement buildings. For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs (a) and (b) above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed, calculated on the basis of the current connection charge applicable for the new construction of the building dcmolis.1ed or destroyed. In no case shall such credit exceed the connection charge. AGENDA ITEM #20 -DISTRICT 5 "T -3" (d) Connection charges for additions to or alterations of existing buildings. In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of family dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than family dwelling buildings, the connection charge shall be $250 for each dwelling unit added or created and in the case of new construction other than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $130 per 1000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construction provided that new construction shall contain additional fixture units. (e) Payment of connection charges. Payment of connection charges shall be required at the time of issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, excepting in the case of a building permit in the City of Newport Beach. The payment of the sewer connection charge for such buildings will be required at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within the territorial limits of the District. (f) Schedule of charges. A schedule of cl1arges specified herein will be on file in the office of the Secretary of the District and in the Building Department of the City of Newport Beach." Section 4. The Secretary of the Board is directed to certify to the adoption of this ordinance-and cause it to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the County. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its adoption. ~ AGENDA ITEM #20 -DISTRICT 5 II U" RESOLUTION NO. 76-51-6 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 73-52-6 RE DIRECTORS' UNI FOl{M MILEAGE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT A RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 76-52-6 TO PROVIDE FOR DIRECTORS' UNIFORM MILEAGE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Section 4 of Resolution No. 73-52-6 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 4. That each Director shall receive the sum of Fifteen Cents ($.15) per mile for each mile up to and including 150 miles, Twelve Cents ($.12) per mile for each mile over 150 miles up to and including 600 miles, and Six Cents ($.06) per mile for all miles in excess of 600 miles, actually traveled on business of the District per month. When traveling on the busines~ of more than one District, such Director shall receive no more than said mileage, whether on the business of one or several Districts''; and, Section· 2. That this resolution shal 1 become· effective March 10, 1976. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 10, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #23 -DISTRICT 6 II u II RES!J>LUTJION NO.. 76-33-1 FIXING COMPENSATl.DN FOR DIRECTORS A RESOLUTION DF THE BOAllD OF Dir~CTORS OF. COUNTY S.ANIT1\'TTON DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNIT, CALIFDRNIA., FIXING COMPEN- SATION FOR ITS DIRECTORS AND RE.SCI ND ING RESOUJTIONS NOS .• 63-128 AND tf>B-3-1 REGkR.DJNG CDMPE'NSATlON WHEREAS, Section 4733 .. 5 of the Hea11::h :and Sa£ety Corle prontles 1:.b:at \Where two or more County Sanitation Districts h.ave joined in purchase:, nwnersbip:J use., -construction, or operation of a sewerage system :and said Districts noJ.d their n:neeting.s jointly_, and one or more -of the Direct.ors serve :as .a Di:re:ctor on JD~ t:han one of suc.b Distri.cts meeting jointly, tbe Districts may_, by jnint TeS·D- lution approved by each District_, limit: 'the cm1q:>ensatirm nf' sucb a Director £nr at.t.ending said jointly-held meetings; and,, WHEREAS,, Cormt:y Sanitation Districts Nos .. 1_, 2_, 3,, 5_, '6_, 7_, :and 11_, n:f Orange Cmmty_, California_, have heretofore executed a ,,Joint D:wner.sbip_., Operation and Construction Agreement, dated .July 1_, 1970_, as :amended; and_., WHEREAS_, said Districts hold their. regular monthly :meetings jointly:; NOW_, :.THEREFORE_, the Board 0£ Directors ,0£ cColIDty Sanitation Di.strict No .. 1, 0£ Orange Cormty, Cali£onria, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That each Director shall receive tbe smn o:f $5U .. 100 :for attend- ance at any meeting 0£ ~e Bo~d ?f Directors .0£ this District., provided that :he shaH not receive IDore than tile sum of $ liOD .. DD per 1llIDJlth as sudt <e<LJnpensatinn from t.his District; and_, Section 2.. That not withstanding the provisions .0£ .Section 1., 'when a Director of this District is also a Director of another District:, said Direct.or shall be paid not more than a tot.al of $50 .. 00 £or any jointly-held meeting attended by him when such .other District., or !Districts., has., or ·.have., 1dopted a r-esolution substantially .similar to t:hi.s one., :as is permitted under the provisions of Section 4733~5 of the Health .and Safety Cod.e.; .and., "V-1 1 ' AGENDA ITEM #26 -JJlSTRI CT l '"V-1'" "V-2" Section 3. Section 2 of this resolution shall not apply to the Director serving as Joint Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. The Director serving as Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall receive the sum of $50.00 from each District which he presides over in a jointly held meeting, as authorized by Section 4733 of the Health and Safety Code; provided, however, that the Joint Chairman shall not be paid more than $50.00 by any District for any meeting; and, Section 4. That each Director shall receive the sum of Fifteen Cents ($.15) per.mile for each mile up to and including 150 miles, Twelve Cents ($.12) per mile £or each mile over 150 miles Yp to and including 600 miles, and Six.Cents ($.06) per mile for all miles in excess of 600 miles, actually traveled on business of the District per month. When traveling on the business of more than one District, such Director shall receive no more than said mileage, whether on the business of one or several Districts; and, Section 5. That each District meeting jointly shall bear an equal portion of said compensation and mileage expense; and, Section 6. That Resolutions Nos. 63-128 and 68-3-1 concerning compensation of Directors, are hereby rescinded and made of no further effect; and, Section 7. That this resolution shall become effective ~~~~~~~~~ and, Section 8. That all actions of this District, whether by resolution, motion or otherwise, inconsistent herewith or contrary to the terms hereof, be and they are hereby amended to conform to the terms of this resolution. . AGENDA ITEM #26 -DISTRICT 1 "V-2" 1· "W-1" RESOLUTION NO. 76-11-1 ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION AND REIMf3URSEMENT FOR EXPENSES FOR DI HEC'l'ORS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE COMPENSATION AND EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT POLICIES FOR ITS DIRECTORS, AND REPEALING RESOLUTIONS NO. 63-128 AND 68-3-1. WHEREAS, Section 4733 of the Health and Safety Code:provides that the District Board has the power to fix the amount of compensa- tion per meeting to be paid each member of the Board or for each day's service rendered as a member by request of the Board; and WHEREAS, Section 4733.5 of the Health and Safety Code provid~s that where two or more County Sanitation Districts have joined in the purchase, ownership, use, construction or operation.of a sewerage system and said Districts hold their ~eetings jointly, and one or more.of the Directors serve as a Director on more than one of such Districts meeting jointly, the Districts may, by. resolution approved by each District, limit the compensation of such a Director for attending said jointly held meetings; and WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, Caiifornia, have heretofore executed a Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, dated July 1, .1970, as amended; and WHEREAS, Section 4734 of the Health and Sa~ety. Code provides that where two or more County Sanitation Districts. have joined in the administration anq operation of the respective Districts and hold their meetings jointly and such meetings are presided over by a Director of one.of the Districts acting as Joint Chairman for and on behalf of the joint organization, each District so participating may pay the Joint Chairman the same compensation as a Director of such District is paid; and AGENDA ITEM #26 -DISTRICT 1 "'tl-1" ·~ 11 W-2" WHEREAS, said Districts hold their regular monthly meetings jointly. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section·!. That each Director shall receive tr.e sum of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) for attendance at each meeting of the Board of Directors or for each day's service rendered as a member of the Board by request of the Board, provided that he shall not receive more· than the sum of Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) per month as such compensation from this District. Each day's service rendered as a member of the District Board shall be deemed to intlud2, but not be limited to, attendance: (a) as a member of the Executive Committee of the Joint Administrative Organization; (b) as a member of any committee appointed by the Chairman of the Joint Adm~nistrative Organization or the Chairman of the District which has established the committee; (c) when expressly invited to attend the Executive Committee meetings by the Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization; (d) conferences with State and/or Federal le~islators regarding Joint Administrative Organization business when approved by action of the Joint Boards; _or (e) attendance at conferences for business of the Joint Administrative Organization or the District when approved by action of the Joint Boards or the District Board. Section 2. If a Director represents two or more Districts, the payment to the Director for attendance at meetings or for each day's service shall be"shared equally with each District repre- sented by the Director. Section 3. Notwithstanding the provisions of Se~tion 1, when n Director of this District is also a Director of nnothcr District, said Director shall be paid not more than a total of Fifty Dollars {$50.00) per day for attendance at any jojntly held meeting of said Districts or each day's services rEndered AGENDA ITEM #26 -DISTRICT 1 "\4-2" "W-3" concurrently to said Districts by the Director when such other District, or Districts, has, or have, adopted a resolution substantially similar to this one, as is permitted under the provisions of Section 4733.S of the. Health and Safety Code. Section·4. Section 3 of this resolution shall not apply to the Director serving as Joint ~hairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. The Director serving as Chairman of the Joint Admin- istrative Organization shall receive the sum of Fifty Doll~rs ($50.00} from each District which he presides over in a jointly held meeting of the Joint Administrative Organization, as author- ized by Se~tion 4734 of the Health and Safety Code; provided, however, that the Joint Chairman shall not be paid more than Fifty Dollars ($50.00) by any District for any meeting. Section 5. The Director serving as Chairman pr Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organizat~on shall receive the sum of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) from the District which he represents and no other District when attending a meeting of his District or other Districts or Executive Committee or other Committee as3ignments approved by. the Joint Boards, or when attending to special ·service rendered as a Director by request of ·the Joint Boards. Section 6. Each Director shall receive the sum of Fifteen Cents ($.15) per mile for each mile up to and including 150 miles, Twelve Cents ($.12) per mile for each mile over 150 miles up to and including 600 miles, and Six Cents ($.06) per mile for all miles in excess of 600 miles, actually traveled on business of the. District per month. When traveling on the business of more than one District, such Director shall receive no more than said mileage, whether on the business of one or several Districts. Section 7. When traveling on the business of one or more Districts, the Director shall be entitled to reimbursement of expenses necessarily incurred in the course of said tr~vel in accordnnce with the following schedule: AGENDA ITEM #26 -DISTRICT 1 "\'/-3" "W-4" Commercial Transportation -per actual invoice Hotel -room rate per actual statement for occupancy Registration -actual cost of conference or meeting registration fee Ground Transportation -as itemized Telephone Service -as itemized Meals, Gratuities and Incidentals -$20.00 per day. In those cases where the actual cost of the Director's personal meals and incidentals required during the course of the conference or meeting exceeds the per diem, reimbursement will be based upon actual expenditures. Section 8. No Director shall receive pay for attendance at any meeting, such as Executive Committee or other committees, which is scheduled immediately preceding, immediately succeeding, or con- current with a regularly scheduled District or joint meeting of the District. Section 9. Resolutions Nos. 63-128 and 68-3-1 concerning compensation for Directors are hereby repealed and made of no further force or effect. Section 10. This resolution shall become effective I 1976. ~~~~~~~~~~~~- PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular.meeting held 1976. AGENDA ITEM #26 -DISTRICT 1 "X" RESOLUTION NO. 76-39-7 AMENDING ANNEXATION POLICY A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLlITION NO. 75-44-7, ESTABLISHING FEES AND PROCEDURES CONCERNING ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT, RE COMPUTATION OF ANNEXATION ACREAGE FEE * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to establish certain requirements for territory seeking annexation to this District; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of this District have heretofore adopted such requirements; and, WHEREAS, this Board of Directors has reviewed the heretofore established policy and finds that it would be appropriate to modify the provision for compu- tation of annexation acreage fee to eliminate inclusion of local collection systems because they have no bearing on the cost of the Districts' Master Plan system and treatment works equity; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Section 1, Sub-Section (b) of Resolution No. 75-44-7 is hereby amended to read as follows: "(b) Beginning July 1, 1975, and annually thereafter, the sum to be paid per acre for the ensuing twelve months will be the net worth per acre of the District, reduced by the book value of local collection facilities, on the preceding June 30. Date of approval by the Board of Directors of the annexation shall govern the amount of the fee per acre hereinabove established." Section 2. That this resolution shall be effective as of July 1, 1975. PASSED AND ADOf'TED at a regular meeting held March 10, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #29 -DISTRICT 7 "X" "Y II LAW Of"FICE:S RICHARD O. ,.RAZ CC S'YCPUCN C. STC.W~RT THOMAS l. WOODRurr .Jc,.rru:v A. ttARTM~N S ( c wcl rt, ,,r o ocl r!JJf & Fr<l zc<<.J 1055 NORTH f.1AIN ~RE:CT, SUITE IOZO ARCA coot: 71'4 83~ • 621Z SA~~L .. ORNIA 92701 January 21, 1976 ---- -----·-~ -----kr. Fred A. Harper General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P. O. Box 8127 ·. Fountain Valley, California 92708 Re: Orange Park Acres Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 Dear Mr. Harper: I have been advised that the Directors of th~ Orange Park Acres Homeowners Association have recently submitted to your office a revised annexation and improvement plan for their properties. Specifically, the request now appears to seek to annex to County Sanitation District No. 7 and not install any portion of the main/trunk sewer system at ·this time. It is my opinion that there is no legal basis under the County Sanitation District Act, the Improvement District Acts or-the District·Reorganization Act to establish an improvement dis- trict solely to pay for the annexation fees that would be paid tO-D1strict No. 7. The provision~ of Health and Safety Code Section 4806 clearly intend that. improvements must be -installed when issuing bonds and annexation fees alone would not qualify. District No. 7 could require the payment or security for the future payment of annexation fees to be posted with the District prior to final action upon the annexation. TLW:ab l-A-2 truly yours, T:::: ef;1.~~ General Counsel AGENDA ITEM #30(A) -DISTRICT 7 "Y" tnNr:!JT A. WILSON l<l:NNCTH I. JONC5 JAMC!I T. MORTON ANORCW C. HALL, JR. OCRALO A LA!IY[R J[RP:MIAM .J. LYNC>I MICHA.ti.. R NAVt JAMI:!! L.COPCLANO !!MARON ti WHITC 'VILso:r~.-. JoNEs, Mo1noN & LYNCH CHAR LI:& N. l<IRKllRIOI: 18U'4•1911 JOMN C. LYNCH (1Q!l8•1971) .. HILIP 0 AS!IA,. ATTORNE'JS •.NO COUNSELLORS AT LAW 630 NORTh <;AN MATEO DRIVE "'""'•A1or .. OONOON (.JOSCPH 11.ooroooN) Pl:OOV L. MetLLIOOTT RODCRT J. Hll..L P, 0. BOX 1::;~ KIAKBRIOC .. WILSON ID,0-ID47 """'111 THOMA!! C. MORONCY T>IOMA5 D ADAMS SHCRROO 5. OA.Vl!I LA.WrlCNCC C. JCN5CN MA'rCR A. OAMICL JOAN C. 15RIOOY PAUL C. Wll.."IN5 THOMAS 5. OWCN R015CRT 0. A.UWDRtY ROY .J. "ocor:N SAN MATEO, CALI FORNI" ()4401 [415) 342-3523 flillRKBAIOE",WILSON, HAAZ~CLO .. WALLACE IU4l•l8CU January 28, 1976 0,. COUNll£L ~RTHU" J, •tA.MZP CLO A. A. KAPLAN (MO QNl yl Honorable Board of Directors Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Re: Proposal for Concurrent Annexation and Bond Authorization -Orange Park Acres Gentlemen: On behalf of the residents and property owners of the Orange Park Acres area and the Orange Park Association, Inc., the following is the general proposal now being made in connection with the annexation. Following extensive investigation and discuss~on, the concept which is proposed to be followed is generally as follows: 1. Concurrently with the annexation procedures, following original proposal, it would be submitted to the voters as a condition of annexa- tion the approval of general obligation bonds covering the following: "Z-1" a) The sum of money necessary to acquire appropriate rights of service and use in the existing treatment and outfall facilities equal to the appropriate annexation charge. b) The payment of a sum necessary to provide major trunks necessary to serve the area within the boundaries, the costs to be adjusted to reflect an off set of any territory within the boundaries of District No. 7 which abuts and would be served by any part of that system, i.e., property north of Chapman Avenue and immediately east of proposed Reach 18 of District No. 7 master plan. c) The reimbursem~nt of advan~es made by certain property owners within the area of costs of annexation, as well as the payment of any costs incurred subsequent to approval by LAFCO. AGENDA ITEM #30(B) -DISTRICT 7 "Z-1" Honorable Board of Directors Sanitation .District No. 7 of Orange County January 28, 1976 Page Two 2.· In exchange for this area incurring an obligation to provide facilities normally payable from connection charges pursuant to the District's policy of providing trunk sewers within one-quarter mile of all properties, each separate parcel within the boundaries of the annexed area as of the date of election would be extended the equivalent of one connection charge credit at such time as the property is hooked to the sewer. In this regard, it is proposed that collector sewers be built either by cash financing, where possible, or by individual assess- rment proceedings. Additionally, it is expected that divisions of land after the date of election would result in the obligation to pay con- nection charges for all except the first connection. 3. As in the case of a private subdivision development, and as a condition of the general obligation bond proceedings, the District will provide for the contribution from time to time from connection charges of a reimbursement of an appropriate dollar figure relating to that portion of the trunk system funded through the bond issue. It is here understood that there are currently outstanding previously executed reimbursement agreements amounting to approximately $150,000. For that purpose, an attempt will be made to adjust the reimbursement obligation in order to assure that the earlier contractors will not be unduly affected by this proposal. The proceeds of the reimbursements to the present area would be utilized for the purpose of retiring bonds in advance of maturity or, if more appropriate from a cost saving standpoint, for the payment of both principal and interest when due. It.is presently understood that the £oregoing proposal would result in a maximum initial debt obligation for this annexation of some $1,141,000. The precis~ dollar figures must be refined by the assistance or the District staff and would be available at least in preliminary form at the time of presentation of the proposal to LAFCO. The final form would be before your Honorable Board prior to the actual formal hearing on the annexation. It is proposed that the matter should be expedited so that it may be placed on the ballot no later than November of this year, with the understanding that property would be placed on the tax roll for the 1977-78 fiscal year. Any delay beyond November would result in a postponement into a later fiscal year. We hope that the foregoing proposal will result in a clearly equitable treatment of the property owners .and users, both within the "Z-2" AGENDA ITEM #30(B) -DISTRICT 7 "Z-2" . . ... . Honorable Board of Directors Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County • January 28, 1976 Page Three present boundaries of Sanitation District No. 7 and within the proposed annexed area. It is our intent to assure that all persons. are equally treated and that no unfair advantage or "free rides" are received and further to assure that the cost of sewers will not be so burdensome as to prove impossible of accomplishment. for PLMcE:s cc: Thomas L. Woodruff, Esq. Mr. George C. Rach Orange Park Association, Inc. "Z-3" AGENDA ITEM #30(B) -DISTRICT 7 "Z-3" II AA" RESOLUTION NO. 76-52-7 AMENDING RESOLlJfION NO. 73-53-7 RE DIRECTORS' UNIFORM MILEAGE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT A RESOLlITION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 73-53-7 TO PROVIDE FOR DIRECTORS' UNIFORM MILEAGE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Section 4 of Resolution No. 73-53-7 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 4. Tirnt each Director shall receive the sum of Fifteen Cents ($.15) per mile for each mile up to and including 150 miles, Twelve Cents ($.12) per mile for each mile over 150 miles up to and including 600 miles, and Six Cents ($.06) per mile for all miles in excess of 600 miles, actually traveled on business of the District_per month. When traveling on the business of more than one District, such Director shall receive no more than said mileage, whether on the business of one or several Districts"; and, Section 2. That this resolution shall become effective March 10, 1976. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 10, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #3J. -DISTRICT 7 II AA" -,. CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORTS FEBRUARY 2 9 1 19 76 ENGINEERING DEPART1'1 E NT OE'<:ic: PtPIN<r 1..,, ~TA l-L.AT10 ,.._, C(!)t-JTl f•.HA.~S 10 I q B r ' 5 4 J 2 I I r--f<ETUR..tv ·s t-~1..;. pu f';\f ::ffATIOl-J -Pl A 11.EA c.,L.JCNJ€.D up I tJ p~-FA~ATio N ~DK. p1P/IVGr o.J ST~J-L-~H10 /\J DIGE.'$TE~f ' .-, ( ) "__.. EXISTJN6 ~ltOJ.JDARY r-.. aARIF/£/U . \ l'-_; AERATION BA51N~ PJIJG. 2 4 8 £1/\JG I N~TAu.£0 (}(}() ~E'!'lC ii:lQl'J~ 1M.Pr'!.0Pb:IZ.LY ~ F;24~1CAT!;O fi\f.t':::kAN 151'1'5 I 3 6 . s 8 7 10 9 IZ II 14 /3 fEtONDARY (LARIFIEKS S U.ll C.E' GATE Afl.ID OP~JZ.Ai/J£ I N srALJ..AT IO N C OtUT l)JUE S WAS TE ~L U06E THlc.J<ENE ~S / D POWE K BU/L/)J)IG 50 MG D ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT CONTRACT NO. P1 -16 C.0.NT.RACT .NO._ P1.-t6 -------·---- 50 MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT Donovan Construction Company of Minnesota, Contractor STARTING DATE: June 27, 1974 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $29,876,ooo.oo PAID TO DATE: $24,116, ,.(88. 35 Contract is for the construction of Activated Sludge secondary treatment facilities at Plant No. l. The new facilities UJi],], aid the Districts in meeting rrandated State and Federal ocean discharge re.quiremen ts. h'hen completed, the secondary treatment system 11Ji],], process the 50 mgd of wastetJater flowing through Plant No. 1. The. effluent wiU then b·lend CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 14, 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 30 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 13, 1977 1.Jith Plant No. 2 effluent at the outfaZl booster station, improving the overall quality of water pwnped through the outfall system into the ocean. Significant structuxies included in the contra.ct are the Blower Building, Aeration Basins, Second- ary C"larifiers, wo Digeste1~s, Waste Sludge Thick- eners and the Power Bui Zdin.g. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH As· the quantity of work diminishes and the general working pace of the job slows, Donovan has been releasing employees. They have also had to contend with supplier problems such as inadequate shop drawings and improperly fabricated equipment. In the Blower Building there have been some pours in the balcony and ceiling areas. The pump station engines were set in place and the exterior walls are being sandblasted. Aeration Basin deck piping continues with weirs being installed in the effluent area. Sluice r;ates are being installed on the Secondary Calrifiers. The contractor is reworking the mechanisms furnj_shed for the Waste Sludge Thickeners. Discussion have been attended regarding pumps which were not assembled per specification. No work accomplished in the Power Building this month. The.Digesters have been cleaned up for the antici~ated piping installation. ------0----- JPL ACTS PROCESS PLANT JOB N2. PW-045 ( CONTRACT PW~045 JPL-ACTS PROCESS PLANT J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation & Henck Pro, A Joint Venture, Contractor STARTING DATE: Oct. 1, 1975 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: x PAID TO DATE: x '· Contra.ct is for construction of a one million gal- lon per cl.c:y pilot wastewater> treatment plant at Waste:Jater Treatment Plant No. 2. The plant ivi.Zl. use a unique Activated Carbon Treatment System (ACl'S) deve'loped by the National Aeronautics and Spa.ce.Agency's Jet Propulsion Labora.tory. This tl"eatment method was perfected in its experimental sta.ges with a mobile research unit open:i.ted by JPL personnel at the Districts' Wastewater Treatment Plant No. l in Fozmtain ValZey during 1974-75. The system uses sludge raemoved from the wastewate:ra to produce activated ca:rbon thI'.ough a pyrolysis reactor. The activated caztbon is then reintro- duced into the wastewater stream in a secondary sta.ge for additional. removal of pollutants. OnZ.y . . -pa:ratially used after the second s~ge, the aotiva- CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 28, 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar D~.ys PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 28, 1976 ted carbon and secondary sludge slurry is fed into the inco"ming waste:Jate:ra stream to increase system efficiency. The mobile e:r:perimental unit used to refine this system from laboratory bench experiments was batch operated with mechanical. handling of rra.teriaZ from sta.ge to stage. The pilot plant li){,Z.Z. be a contin- uously run, automated system. As.a pri.me objective of the Acrs, it could solve an increasing problem of sludge disposal as this rrateri.aZ. becomes more plentiful. with improved wastetJater treatment and increased flows. In ad- dition, the effluent f:r>0m this treatment system is e::r:pected to meet the discha.Pge :raequirements of the Districts' N •. P.D.E.S. permit • ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Paving and landscaping on the water side of the plant completed. All equipment with the· exception of the flash dryer, calciner and afterburner are operational. A complete plant start up is anticipated for the week of March 29th. Current evaluation of noise and dust control underway. Instrumentation, trouble shooting and systems int~gration work will continue through the month. )CThis contmct is a design and con.tJtruct contract whereby the contractor U1 paid $50,000.00 plua the actual co~ta for all labor and mate1-iala. TRINIOAO ==ST=·~ LAKE VIEW . ~,..~ \\"'\\.'< F £ E ~~~ Q\S1 -2 -· ~ . . .. . . . . . . . .. I . . . .· .· . . "!' ... \ : ,,..,. .. I '-\.. •• . '·. . :: ~ ·.= :· ...... .: .: er .. .. .. ·-• 4 .. .. . . coNlRACl No.2-14-3 GROVE: ~T. --- CONTRACT 2 -14-3 SANTA ANA RIVER ItlTEf~CEPTOR SEWER ~ SOUTH SANTA ANA RJ VER lfHERCEPTOR CONNECTORJ REACHES Z, 3 & 4 John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contractor ST AR Tl NG DATE : 0 ct . 15 , 19 7 5 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $3,814,462.00 PAID TO DATE: $33,664.oo Contract calls for the construction of a 3.125 ~~le rcinf orced concrete pipe trunk Zine eewer a- long La Palma Ava. from Grove St. to Imperial. Hwy. in hzaheim. Phe first one-third of the project uses 51" diam- eter pipe, the bal.ance is 48". Also included in the contract ie a lateral con- ncctozt Une to the Santa Ana River• Intei'ceptor system from 300' north of Santa Ana CaJZyon Rdo a- long Imperial Hwy. to La. Palma Ave. This 2?50' CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Nov. 12, 1977 TI ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Nov. 12, 1977 section of 33" diameter vitr1:fied clay pipe is designed to receive flows. from the South R{ve2, Trunk, se2,ving Santa Ana Canyon. With the c:ov;p Z.C- tion of the South Rlvcr Trunk, the Santa Ana Can- yon pwrrr.n:ng station can. be abandoned. This section of the interceptor system is designed to 1zandle up to 35 miUion gallons flow per dayo Included in this figure is 30 NGD aUovxmce for accepting future high brine waste1;Jater flou.ls from San Bex?uzr4ino ~.d Riverside Coimties o ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Contractor installed 112 feet of pipe during February. The heading remains in the vicinity of Grove St. and La Palma Ave. Trenching has been backfilled across the eastbound traffic lanes and opened up the traffic. If the present method of operation is continued, ·it may not be necessary-to close Palm Ave. to traffic as previously proposed. One lane of controlled traffic in each direction continues in the vicinity of the pipe head. The jacking pit for tunneling under the railroad was started during February and encountered.problems when it was found that a gas line casing was lower than shown on.the plans and interferred with the contractor's casing used in the tunneling operation. The contractor will now begin a new jacking pit from the east to meet the tunnel where the gas line interferred with it. The sewer line itself will fit under the gas line casing that exists in the ground. DJS.T. 2 • z COMPLETE ---... TO BE CONSTRUCTED CONTRACT No. 2 -14 -4 PROPosEo PARK S1T£ .. PRIVATE RO. """ .. CONTRACT 2 -14-4 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH S Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc., Contractor STARTING DATE: Oct. 15,, 1975 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $4, 240, 957. 00 PAID TO DATE: $1, 069, 965. 50 Contiact io for construction of a 5.1 mile long Bection of rdnf orced concrete pipe trunk line eel.Jex> from Inipc1•ial, llwy. along La Palma Aveo in AnaJwim, t!"aVer>ving the nCl.J Yorba RegioriaZ Pa!"k to Weir Canyon Rd. The right-of-z,Jay then crosacs the Santa li>?a Rive!" at two places as it traverses county territory through Santa Ana Val Zey lrriga- tion Co. and Bi'yant Ranch p2-iopertias to Gypswn Rd. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 7' 1977 Tl ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 7' 19 7 7 Vepending on design criteria, vaPious sections of this line uc.e 42, 45 and 51 inch dfometer pipe. This cection will, handle . flows up to 32 mill.ion gallons per dayo Ir.eluded. in this figure is 30 NGD allowance for accepting fut-urc high brine wastei.Jater flows from San Ber>nardino and Riveroide Counties. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Contractor installed 5,616 feet of pipe 'during February. Pipe heading is now at Mosswood Drive and about 80% through the Yorba Linda Regionq,l Park section·. The trench is backfilled and compacted to within a few hundred feet of the pipe heading· and all street areas have been paved to ease traffic flow. DIST. 2 ---- CONTRACT No. 2-14-5 COAL CANYON RD. GYPSUM CANYON RD. SANTA ANA CANYON RD. CONTRACT 2-14-5 SANTA ANA RIVEH INTERCEPTOH SEWER REACHES 6, 7 & 8 S. S. Zarubica,· Contractor ST.ART! NG D/\ TE: ORIGINAL CONTRACT: . PAID TO D/\TE: Nov. 27, 1975 $2,096,676.15 $37,437.35 'contract is for the construction of ·a 2. 4 mile long section of reinforced concrete pipe lino BezJ- cr. The Uno goes through the Santa Ana Canyon from where Contract llo. 2-11-4 ends in ahout tlzc center of the Bryant Ranch property, along the route of the Santa Ana River and through the northern po1~tion of the Gl'oen River Golf Course to the County Line. The line terrr.inates in a cor.trol and meterir.g struci'ure designed to measzn.1 e [ZouJs from the upper basin counties. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 21, ·1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Dnys PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 21, 1976 The line conait;tB of 15, 42, and 39-inch diamcte1• sections of pipe. The d-i-G!Tieterc c7:.a>~ge in 21 cla- tion to decign. reqU1~rcrr:en ts.' Thie ccction of the Santa Ana River Intcrcept'o'I' cy.s tcm will han.cile flews of approxir:-ateZy 32 million gallons pel' £?ay. Included in this figv11e is 30 /.,'GD aUowance f'o1 1 accepting futu:r>e high brine 1h'asteLJater floL]:; frcm San Be1'7lardino and R-tvcrside Counties. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH . • Contractor has dug the necessary pits for construction of the metering structure at the west end of .the job, and· is starting pipe excavation. Fencing .of the pipeline right-of-way has been completed through the golf course . DI ST. 2 CONTRACT No. 2-15 lU " ~ CAL STATE ~ULLERTON q;: CAMPUS ~ CONTRACT No. 2-15 YORBA LINDA PUMP STATION J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation & Hcnck Pro, A Joint Venture, Contractor STARTING DATE: Sept. 26, 1974 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $671, 146.-oo PAID TO DATE: $620,531.57 Contract is "for the construction of a reinforced conCPete structure to house wet wells and pwnps for tmnsferring tributary uxistewater through a force m:iin line into the Santa Ana River, Carbon Ca/llJOn Inte1"ceptor-reZief Trunk Line system for conveyance to rla.otewater Redamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain VaZZ.ey. This will assist in relieving the p1"esentZy congested Newhope-Placentia .Trunk Line and will serve proposed Zand use development of the tributary area to the year 2010. The pwnp station structta>e is located at the in- tersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associa:ted Road in .Fullerton. It is being constructed on CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 22, 1975 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 81 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 10, 19'""(6 what was originally Vniversit;y of California, Ful- lerton property at the nortlw1-in perimeter of the campus. Special arrangements were m:ide with the University for use of the property. The above-growui portion of the structure will be a low profile slab 85~ x 109', 2 feet above ground. The deepest portion of the structure will be 35 feet wuier the ground. The District has agreed to construct a slwnp-stone fence around the structu.re and landscape the area in accordance L>ith future compatible use by the University. The Univeroity plans to construct an arboretum in the immediate area at some futta'e date. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Brick wall surrounding the pump station on three sides has been completed. Landscaping is now complete on all sides, with trees in place both on the site and along Yorba Linda Blvd. Sprinklers are in in the landscaped area. The.surface area inside the brick wall around the pump station has been painted with black top. Inside structural painting continues and is approximately 70% complete .. Pump discharge manifolding is completed, with three pumps in place. Pump engines expected for delivery last month have not shown up. All essential wiring to the structure has been completed and the power transformer energized. Control wiring will be completed when the pump. motors are delivered and installed. J l..___-=-------L INC O_=-.;._L N _I l......__~AVE~. ___,, L I I I Cl TY OF D«L I -ANAl-IEIM MOii~ ~· al.lit/DA ~ ~ tJRANGE .. ! AVE_ N PARK CERRITOS AVE. CITY OF" s. p, A*. DIST. 3 CYPRESS SYRACUSE ____ _u.~~~T~E~LL~A:..:.....-----Jlt-----___;A~~~E~.---___J II --COMPLETE , ... --TO BE CONSTRUCTED CONTRACT No. 3-20-2 CONTRACT No. 3-20-2 KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 7 A. G~ Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Co., A Joint Venture, Contractor STARTING DATE: March 6, 1975 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $3,876,870.00 PAID TO DATE: $3, 393, 076. 00 Contract is for instaZZation of a Reinforced Con- crete Pipe (R. C.P.) sewer line from a point 1200 feet south of KateZZa Avenue on Knott Avenue in Stanton, north on Knott Avenue to Lincoln Avenue in Anaheim, a distance of 2. 3 mites. Pipe diame- ters are 72" for the first 3, 900 feet, 63" for 6, 900 feet and 66" for the remaining 1200 feet of the project. Flows from this reach wiU drain in- to Contract 3-20-1 to the .south. This project is a portion of the Knott Inte1~ceptor relief system designed to relieve the presently CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: March 6, 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days. PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: March 6' 1976 congested MiZZer-l!older Trunk Sewer by inte11cep- ting flows from the northwest portion of District 3. The southerly ternnnus of the system is at the intersection of Brookhurst Street and Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley. It wiZZ eventuaZZy extend to Imperial Avenue in La Habra. This portion of the relief system is designed to handle a flow of 68 million gallons per day and LJiZZ serve the proposed developed land use plan in the tributary area to the year 2010. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Contractor installed 870 feet of pipe during February. First course paving has been laid to Orange Avenue. Trench is backfilled to the vicinity of Del Monte St. The jacking pit area approaching the railroad at Ball Road has been paved, with a small portion left open for later installation of a 12" connector line sewer and vent. Two lane traffic control from Katella south to Orange Avenue with flagman control down to one lane in the vicinity of the pipe heading continues. Final paving on Knott Ave. through the City of Stanton will be installed during the week of March Sth. DI ST. 3 --COMPLETE -llU -TO BE CONSTRUCTED CONTRACT No. 3 -21 -1 tJRANGEWOOO ~ AVE. "" \) " '' ~ ~ 't Ro~~Moo;? r. WY. J ~I· ~~ BRADBURY KO. ~ATELlA AVE'. FARGUJ.IA~ AVE. - Al ( ... CONTRACT No. 3-21-1 WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 25, 26 & PORTION OF 27 A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Company, A Joint Venture, Contractor ~ ST AR TI NG DATE : ORIGINAL CONTRACT: PAID TO DATE: June 26, 1975 $1, 416, 41~8. 00 $1,417,834.14 Contrac~ is for the in~talZation of a Vitrified Clay Pipe (V. C. P.) sewer from the vicinity of the District's Westside Lift Station, .1800 feet west of Seal Beach Boulevard and Lampson Avenue along the flood control channel, along the channel to Seal Beach Boulevard where it turns north along Los Alamitos Boulevard (the northern extension of Seal Beach Boulevard) to Katella Avenue. It then turns east on KateUa to Lexington Drive, where it tenninates. Pipe diameter is 39" for the fi!:'st 5, 500 feet, 36" for the next 5, 700 feet and 30" for the final 5, 200 feet. Total length is approx- i~ately 3.1 miles. This project is a continuation of the Westside Relief Interceptor sewer which begins at the Seal Beach Boulevard Pumping Station at the intersec- CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 22, 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days · PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 22, 1976 tion of Seal-Beach Boulevard and Westminster Ave- nue in the City of Seal Beach. The system will eventuaZ:Z.y run generally in a northerly direction through the western portion of District 3 and will terminate at Cresent Avenue and Moody Street in the City of La PaUna.. Upon completion, the system will 1'elieve the Los Alamitos Subtrunk Sewer which, at present, func- tions as the main interceptor sewer for the west~ side basin and, for the most part, is currently flowing at or necw peak capacity. This portion of the relief interceptor is designed to handle floos of up to 14. 'l million gallons per day and will serve the proposed developed Zand use plan in the tributary area to the year 2010. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Job completed. Minor repairs and completion of contract obligations and permit requirements. . . SUMMARY THEATMENT PLANT WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During February Total Work Awaiting Award DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During February Total Work Awaiting Award TOT AL AMOUNT UNDER CONT.RACT AND AWAITING AWARD $30,139,478 2LJ,116~788 795,809 42,046 $17,318,210 6,589,103 1,251,449 37,253 $30,139,478 $17,318,210 37,253 $47,536,987 .. AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 March 1, 1976 Joint Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 Subject: Summary Financial Report for Six Months Ended December 31, 1975 Transmitted herewith is the regular quarterly summary financial report for the six months ended December 31, 1975, pursuant to the Boards' policy directive of June 14, 1972. The statements summarize the fiscal activities of the joint operations and the individual Districts for the first half of the 1975-76 fiscal year and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The combined 1975- 7~ budgets for all Districts is $98.9 mill ion, of which approximately 82% is for capital expenditures for facil I- .ties improvements and additions. The average percents of budgeted revenue and expense categories of the several Districts are as follows: Budgeted Revenue Average Percent of Total Budget Tax Revenue 19% Federal & State Construction Grants 22 Connection Fees 2 Other Revenues 6 Carry-over from Accumulated Construction Reserves -2...!_ 100% 19% 15 2 11 Budgeted Expenditures District Facilities Expansion and Reserves Joint Works Expansion and Reserves Debt Service Share of Joint Operations District Operations, Maintenance, and Other Average Percent of Total Budget 1974-75 1975-76 44% 41 4 5 6 100% 45% 37 4 5 _9_ 100% Included in each District's statement is a summary of the above major income and expense categories and an itemization of their trunk sewer construction projects, and respective share of the joint works expansion. Separ~te staff reports relative to the current status on individual constructiori projects are included each month with the agenda material for the Joint Board meeting. Except for inventory control, the EDP system has been fully implemented. The inventory system is being phased in conjunction with the move to our new warehouse and establishment of revised warehousing and purchasing procedures which we expect to complete in the near future. The staff is undertaking a review of the on-1 ine computer system to assure maximum utilization of its capabilities, consistent with cost effectiveness. Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. The statements are presented on an accrual basis and, therefore, inter-district transactions for fiscal '75-76 which were accrued in 1974-75 are not reflected in the yeur-to-date balances. If you have any questions concerning the material, I would be pleased to discuss them with you at your convenience. CASH INVESTMENTS Earned interest of approximately $1 ,368,000 from our continuing program of investing reserve funds (primarily capital funds accumulated for construction of required sewerage facilities) has accrued during the first six months of fiscal 1975-76. As of December 31st, approximately 95% of the Districts' cash funds were invested In short-term government securities or time deposits as shown below. The balance of cash on hand was earning Interest in commingled investments with the County Treasurer's office. Amount Percent Cash on Hand $ 2,368,949 4.6% Investments in Gov't Securities 49,088,959 ~ Total (Al 1 Districts) $51,4571908 100.0% JOINT OPERATING FUND This fund accounts for operation, maintenance, and administrative activities relative to the Districts' jointly- owned treatment and disposal facilities. Salaries and Wages -As previously reported funds were not included in the budget for salary increases granted by the Boards pursuant to agreements with employee groups. However, because of payroll savings resulting from unfilled positions, the budget allocation should be sufficient to carry through the fiscal year. Employees' Benefits -Includes Retirement, Workmen's Compensation, Group Medical Insurance, and Uniforms. Gasoline, Oil, and Fuel -As the Directors are aware, significant cost increases in petroleum products have been experienced. The Districts' cooperative purchasing arrangement for gasoline and diesel fuel with the County of Orange has been superseded by Federal petroleum allocation and price regulations. Barring further increases, the budget allocation should suffice. Insurance -Annual premiums are expensed at time of payment which is generally during the first quarter. It is becoming increasingly difficult to place this coverage because of the reluctance of carriers to insure governmental agencies. Premiums have doubled in the past two years. Chlorine and Odor Control Chemicals -Primarily for odor control at treatment plant sites. Our chlorine contract expired in December and although last year's chlorine unit costs increased 55%, the new unit price bid was down. Chemical Coagulants -The staff has been able to temporarily change the mode of operation which has precluded the necessity of using chemicals at the rate originally anticipated and yet enable the Districts to meet the current enforced discharge regulations. Additionally, we have been able to obtain improved q~ality chemicals at lower cost which has reduced the cost. Contractual Services -Expenditures to date are for sludge hauling and EDP services. Because of escalating costs and increasing volumes a budget transfer for this account may be necessary. Professional Services -Includes cost of General Counsel's fees and audit fees paid through December 31st. Printing and Publications -Reproduction policies have been changed to minimize costs. However, continuing demand by the public for information on District activities, coupled with increased volume and "paper work" required by other ~gencies and spiraling costs keep this item on the uptrend. It is anticipated that a budget transfer will be required for this account. Rents ~nd Leases -Equipment -Primarily for the rental of large equipment necessary for removing and replacing equipment and other necessary work during the course of maintenance and repair operations. Repairs and Maintenance -Parts and supplies for repair of plant facilities. Escalating costs continue to have a significant impact on this item. Research and Monitoring -Annual share of participation in Southern California Coastal Water Research Project has been paid, and expense to date includes estimated allocations for the first six months of 1975-76. -2- f"' Utilities -The major item in the Utilities Expense Account is for purchased electrical power, which has Increased substantially due to the Increase of petroleum cost to the electrical utilities. A portion is from. rising demand as flows increase and new facilities are placed into service. Prior Year's Expense -This account represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account balance from the previous year. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND This fund accounts for the costs of expanding and improving the Districts' presently-owned treatment and disposal facilities and represents an average of 41% of each individual District's budget requirements for 1975-76. During the first six months, $8.5 mill ion was expended on joint works treatment and disposal facilities expansion, primarily on the $29.6 million 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 1, approxi- mately 84% of which wil 1 be grant funded. The share of joint works expansion costs are reflected in the financial statements of the respective Districts. INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS -The statements reflect the accounting transactions for the seven Districts and include each respective District's share of the Joint Operating Fund and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. Taxes -Approximately 51% of the budgeted property taxes for 1975-76 have been received through December 31st. Federal and State Construction Grants -Construction Grant funds received during the period amount to $7.5 mil lion, all on the 46 MGD Activated Sludge project. Presently, State and Federal agencies will fund 87-1/2% of 11 approved 11 treatment projects. However, these agencies have advised that payments wi 11 be limited to 80% of the grant amount until an acceptable revenue program is adopted. The staff has previously advised the Directors that our revenue program, even though it has been used as a 11 model 11 by the State, is unacceptable because it includes ad valorem taxes for operation, maintenance and capital recovery charges. The Boards are aware that our Districts, along with other large sewering agencies across the nation, are vigorously supporting HR 9560 which would amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to allow ad valorem taxes, and result in a substantial overhead cost savings to the Districts taxpayers. Passage of the amend- ment appears somewhat in doubt at this time and it wil 1 therefor be necessary for the Boards to consider adoption of a program implementing 11 user charges 11 to assure receipt of the ful 1 grant allocation. Prohibi- tion of ad valorem taxes will also have a substantial affect on long-range funding programs of the Districts. This restriction, coupled with other factors as reported on in the budget transmittal, will have the most immediate impact on Districts 5 and 6. Connection Fees -Districts 5 and 7 have .had connection charges for several years. Connection fees became effective in Districts 2 and 3 on October 1, 1973. District 5 revenues have dropped off considerably (only 23% of last year's budget was received) during the last several months and collections this year are running behind budget. District 7 fees have also decreased substantially over the past two years. District 2 is running substantially behind the budget and District 3 is about as projected. However, some cities are not remitting fees to the District on schedule. Further, the budgets for these two Districts are approximately 54% and 25% respectively, of the original annual forecast made by the financial consultant. Other Revenue -Except as footnooted, consists primarily of interest income, various fees, and sale of capacity rights. District Construction -Represents expenditures on Districts' Master Plan construction program of trunk sewers. The average 1975-76 budget for this item is 45% for the seven Districts. However, this average is influenced by the major programs of Districts 2 and 3. Itemization of each project is included on the lower portion of each District's financial statement. The total expenditures for the seven Districts during the first quarter was $8,932,385. Share of Joint Works Construction -Represents Districts' share of joint treatment and disposal facil itics expansion. Discussed above under Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. Bond Retirement and Interest Expense -Payment of principal and interest on outstanding general obligation bonds of the respective Districts. Annual expense for all Districts is approximately $2.3 mill ion. Share of Joint Operating -Represents Districts' share of operating and maintaining jointly-owned treatment and disposal faci Ii ties, and administrative activities. Costs are distributed based upon each District's respective gallonage flow (see Joint Operating Fund statement for details). District Operating and Other Expenditures -Consists primarily of individual Districts' general operating expenses and operation, maintenance, and repair of the respec~ive Districts' collection systems. J. Wayne Sylvester Director of Finance and Board Secretary -3- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF -ORANGE COUNTY SUMMARY JOINT OPERATING BUDGET REVIEW Six Months Ended 12-31-75 SALARIES, WAGES & BENEFITS Salaries & Wages Employee Benefits Sub-total Payroll Less: Chargebacks to Dists & CORF Net Joint Operating Payroll MATERIALS, SUPPLIES & SERVICES Gasoline, Oil & Fuel Insurance Office Expense Operating Expense Chlorine & Odor Control Chemicals Chemical Coagulants '"Other Operating Supplies Contractual Services Professional Services Printing & Publications Rents & Leases--Equipment Repairs & Maintenance Research & Monitoring Travel, Meeting & Training Utilities Other Expenses Prior Years Expenses Total Material & Supplies TOTAL JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE Less: Revenues NET JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE BUDGET 1975-76 3,205,665 609,161 3,814,826 1.100 '000 2. 714. 826 60,000 45,000 25,000 187,000 320,000 127,000 88,000 74,000 30,000 26,000 325,000 154,500 17,000 870,000 19,000 20,000 2,387,500 5, 102, 326 250,000 4,852,326 FLOW IN MILLION GALS GALLONAGE CHARGES 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 3,600 10' 176 10' 698 1,841 1,835 2,053 2.268 32,471 MG MG YEAR TO DATE 1,329,664 208., 522 1,538,186 465,986 1,072,200 20,968 39,822 8,164 54,848 28, 6 71 36,626 35 J 106 18,480 17,434 9,228 135,269 79,282 8,044 254,151 8,207 13,421 767,721 1,839,921 130' 510 1, 709' 411 GALLONAGE .CHARGE 1?9,519 535, 708' 563,188 96,918 96,602 108' 079 119' 397 1. 709,411 REMAINING BUDGET 1,876,001 400,639 2,276,640 634,014 1,642,626 39,032 5,178 16,836 132, 152 291,329 90,374 52,894 55,520 12,566 16' 772 189,731 75,218 8,956 615,849 10,793 6,579 1, 619. 779 3,262,405 119 ,490 3,142,915 COUNTY SAtJITATION DISTRICT MO. 1 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT December 31, 1975 BUDGET Rl~VIE\·! Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVE'llr!ES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Pees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Endj.ng Fund Balances, December 31 1975-76 Budget 1,215,590 1,412,000 37,000 335,457 1,985,000 4,434,738 93, 888 (1) 590,566 63, 350 (1) FACILI~IES EXPANSION CON8:lRUCTIOH IN PROGRESS: ----·-------- Dyer Road Trunk Improvements Share of Joint Works Expansion CO]'vJI'[,E:.CED PROPERTY., PLANT & EQUIP1'IE'NT: Land and Prop2rty Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facllities Disposal Facilities . General Plant and Administrative Fac~_li ties Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equip~cnt Balance 6-30--75 4 1,766,368_ 1,766,372 21,657 4,241,700 11, 593 13,709 5,660,5$2 11, 715 '58·3 (1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves Remaininc '-"' Year to Date Budp;et 4,608,259 604,583 713,980 4,371 154,145 6,085,338 -0- 816, 262 81,681 188,137 12, 301 l, 098, 381 4,986,957 197 5-7. 6 Additions 816,262 816,262 611,007 698,020 32,629 181,312 1,985,000 3,618,476 12,207 402,429 51,049 Balance J..?..:~l-_75. - 4 2,582,630 2,582,634 21,657 4,241,700 11, 593 13,709 5,660,552 ~ __ 81_62_~.?_~--12 ,?_3}_, __ ~~5 __ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT December 31, 1975 BUDGET REVIEW Remaining 1975-76 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, December 31 5,264,912 4,442,000 829,000 7,415,808 19,268,424 10,657,644 553,982(1) 1,523,173 217,700(1) FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Santa Ana River Interceptor Projects Yorba Linda Pump Station Carbon Canyon Interceptors Kraemer Interceptor Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor Other Projects Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP~JENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities "-'uity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-75 251,431 324,094 1,600,596 155,135 1,410,689 48,768 3,790,713 5,554,102 9,344,815 315,333 24,729,699 1,186 33' 172 33,582 17,798,828 52,256,615 (1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves 13,915,782 2,660,774 2,245,012 256,373 810, 033 19,887,974 1,137,623 2,566,622 124,322 531,796 66,679 4,427,042 15,460,932 1975-:76 Additions 307,970 334,608 3,960 474,097 11, 063 5,925 1,137,623 2,566,622 3,704,245 3,704,245 2,604,138 2,196,988 572,627 6,604,775 18,130,801 8,091,022 429,660 991, 377 . 151,021 Balance 12-31-75 559,401 658,702 1,604,556 629,232 1,421,752 54,693 4,928,336 8' 120' 724 13,049,060 315,333 24,729,699 1,186 33' 172 33,582 17,798,828 55,960,860 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 SUMMARY QU/\RTERLY FI N,~NC I AL REPORT December 31, 1975 BUDGET REVIEW Remain in~ 1975-76 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENU8S: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees . Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, December 31 7,437,449 5,183,000 629,000 1,073,000 18,258,550 8,841,250 776 ,546 (1) 1,664,462 424' 300 (1) FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Knott Interceptor Projects Imperial Relief Interceptor Westside Relief Interceptor Projects Other Projects Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-75 7,091,769 844,530 131,870 3,685 8,071,854 6,121,797 14,193,651 266,131 23,833,572 15,036 28,419 . 52,006 19,618,078 58,006,893 (1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves 15,857,645 3,739,998 2,474,479 394,219 484,556 22,950,897 7,252,691 2,828,960 155,641 559,052 88,650 10,884,994 12,065,903 1975-76 Additions 5,759,856 376 1,436,987 SS, 4 72 7,252,691 . 2,828,960 10,081,651 10,081,651 3,697,451 2,708,521 234,781 588,444 11,005,859 6,012,290 620,905 1,105,410 335,650 Balance 12-31-75 12,851,625 844,906 1,568,857 59,157 15,324,545 8,950,757 24,275,302 266,131 23,833,572 15,036 28,419 52,006 19,618,078"-'t 68,088,544 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRI-CT NO. 5 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT December 31, 1975 BUDGET REVIEW Remaining 1975-76 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Snare of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, December 31 1,012,092 985,000 65,000 219,497 1,228,798 2' 409, 119 28' 965 (1) 297,824 250,920(1) FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Pump Station Modifications NIWA Planning Coast Highway Force Main Litigation Other Projects Share of Joint Works Expansion • COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities ~uity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-75 27,981 2,000 1,512 760 32,253 1,232,177 1,264,430 6,231 3,096,885 7,347 7' 115 8,946 3,948,667 8,339,621 (1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves 2,017,349 516,109 498,056 27,664 79,201 3,138,379 10' 024 569,405 24' 391 96,225 89,324 789,369 2,349,010 1975-76 Additions 2,676 410 6,938 10,024 569,405 579,429 579,429 495,983 486,944 37,336 140,296 1,218,774. 1, 839' 714 4,574 201,599 161,596 Balance 12-31-75 30,657 2,000 1,922 7,698 42' 277 1,801,582 1,843,859 6,231 3,096,885 7' 34 7 7' 115 8,946 3,948,667 8,919,050 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT December 31, 1975 BUDGET REVIEW Remaining~ 1975-76 Budget Year to Date Bud~et Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, December 31 632,004 873,000 5,000 133,152 571, 000 2,695,137 35, 546 (1) 302,907 61, 340 (1) FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Pump Station Modifications Coast Highway Force Main Litigation Other Projects Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROPERTY, PDANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities .Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6~30-75 7,405 90 274 7,769 1,092,580 1,100,349 562 618,344 2,653 7,394 16,237 3,501, 311 5,246,850 (1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves 2,213,295 315,632 441,629 3,255 73,851 3,047,662 2,530 504,895 30,138 95,894 13,960 647,417 ·2,400,245 1975-76 Additions 24 2,506 2,530 504,895 507,425 507,425 316, 372 431, 371 1,745 59,301 568,470 2,190,242 5,408 207,013 47,380 Balance 12-31-75 7,405 114 2,780 10' 299 1,597,475 1,607,774 562 618,344 2,653 7,394 16,237 3,501,311""""'< 5,754,275 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 SUMMARY QU/\RTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT December 31, 1975 BUDGET REVIEW Remaining 1975-76 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, December 31 2,005,595 1,225,000 156,000 1,335,495 3,356,841 4,921,573 694,061(1) 340,516 245,275(1) FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Tustin-Orange Trunk Projects Other Projects Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP~fENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities ~,uity in Joint Treatment Facilities ...,,,., Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-3.0-75 569,167 2,395 571,562 1,531,845 2, 103,407 230,165 16,003,785 10,782 12,440 4,908,993 23,269,572 (1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves 5, 106, 557 1,022,161 619,184 110, 102 172, 379 7,030,383 532,359 707,885 388,766 107, 271 77,802 1,814,083 5,216,300 1975-76 Additions 532,359 532,359 707,885 1,240,244 1,240,244 983,434 605,816 45,898 1,163,116 2,824,482 4,213,688 305,295 233,245 167,473 Balance 12-31-75 1,101,526 2,395 1,103,921 2,239,730 3, 343' 651 230,165 16,003,785 10,782 12,440 4,908,993 24,509,816 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRI{T NO. 11 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT December 31, 1975 BUDGET REVIEW Remaining'-" 1975-76 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVBNUES: Taxes-- Federal and State Construction Grants Fees . Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, December 31 1, 217, 106 1,051,000 5,000 418,523 2,741,000 3,140,553 94,700(1) 362,878 212,520(1) FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Slater Ave. Pump Station Wet Well Slater Ave. Pump Station Modifications Master Plan Report Other Projeets Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROPERTY~ PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-75 52,030 7,698 1,302 61,030 1,314,073 1,375,103 18, 711 3,797,881 3,053 19,936 4,211,117 9,425,801 (1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves 4,328,622 622,612 531,159 7,867 136,875 5,627, 135 (2, 842) 607,250 28,300 118, 537 35,577 786,822 4,840,313 197 5-7 6 Additions 9 (2' 851) (2, 842) 607,250 604,408 604,408 594,494 519,841 (2,867) 281,648 2,743,842 2,533,303 66,400 244,341 176, 943 Balance 12-31-75 ----- 52,030 7,707 1,302 (2, 851) 58,188 1,921,323 1, 979, 511 18, 711 3,797,881 3,053 19,936 4,211,117 10,030,209 lo._ ~ ...w.r- March 12, 1976 MEMORANDUM TO: Fred A. Harper RE: Building Conuni ttee Meeting Scheduled for March 30 After the March 10th joint meeting, Director Culver requested that the Building Committee members be invited to the Executive Committee meeting also and the Building Committee could then split off and meet separately. I mentioned to Nonn that the Executive agenda would probably be very short and I didn't foresee any problem. JWS:rb ayne Sylvester !rector of Finance and Board Secretary CHAIRMAN WINN 3-10-76 No. 6-A CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR 5:30 P.M.J ~~,MARCH~. INVITE DIRECTORs(§ALs~ A~ OR DIRECTORS DAVIS AND DOSTAL. THERE WILL ALSO BE A MEETING OF THE BUILDING COMMITTEE AT THE ABOVE HOUR AND DATE. ~ ~ ~ -b.~~-~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ MEETING DATE March 11, 1'7' TI ME 7: 31 p. m. IISHtICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 DISTRICT 1 1,,,.r' RIMA •••• ~it· ,/ _+. __ _ (a.-t:DR I CH) .•.•.. BATTIN . [t ... -y-- (EVANS) .•.....•.. GARTHE ••.•• -I--.,,_----r-----(EDGAR) .•.•••..•• SHARP ••...•• ___ .... __ _ I T 2 ... ,~l~~ ,,. DISTR C ,,,t ,tf-~) 1l-,,1' (LYONS).~····· .. • CALLAHAN... v + - ! EWING) ...•.••... CHAPUT .•.••• -v---;.----. - ) ---v-----DIEDRICH ••••.• CLARK....... --+- GARTtf EL ..•.•.. EVANS....... " -~. THOt91) ...•.••.•.. KAYWOOD •••. _./ __ + _ ___::: FOX) ............ MAC KA I ~.. / + + ( -;--..... -------= HOYT) •.•••.••.•• SM I TH •••... ·------ PERRY....... / -+ (HOLLINDEN) ••.•. SCOTT....... I -..._ ~DUNN~). •••.•...• WINN .•••..•. + __::_ _±__ WARD) ••••.•••... WOOD. • . • • • . • + ..._ GRAHAM} ••..••.. YOUNG....... .I + ~ DISTRICT 3 ~HOMRIGHt\USEN). COX ••••••••. _J __ _ COLLINS) ....... BYRNE •.••••. _I ___ == CULVER..... .J (GRIFFIN). .••... DAVIS....... .; == == ~< .. 'HHEl •••••••• EVANS ••••••. _.; ____ _ ~ KAIN) .••..• FOX •...• ~-!·._" ____ _ './'• " !NEV I LJ .......... GRAHAM •• Ji~. _____ _ THOM) ••••••••••• KAYWOOD •••• ~ ___ _ SONJU) ••• \ •••••• MAC LA IN ••• _.; ____ _ BLACKMANJ •.•••• MC KNEW .... ~ ___ _ OLSON. • • • • • . .I (DIEDRICH) .••••• SCHMIT .•..•• -.;----- (GIBBS) .......... SHIPLEY. .... -r == == (HOLLINDEN) ..•• SVALSTAD... .I ___ _ {WOOD) .••...•.... -WAittJ. ••••••• -Y- (ARB I SO l ........ ~ ./ == == DISTRICT 5 "O~) -µJ£) RYC KOFF \ ..•... MC INNIS... ./ ' . ./ v DIEDRICHJ .•••.• RILEY....... v" / ,/. ROGERS. •••.. _v-_ --"-__ ,_ DISTRICT 6 (MC INNIS) .•.... STORE ....••• ~ ___ _ (DIEDRICH) ..•••. BATTIN. ••••. __:!__ ___ _ RIMA •....•.. _L_ ___ _ DISTRICT 7 (-zJ1~ .1 ?ck} ~ 11,Jf ~·~ NS) ......... GARTHE..... v + ~ AlrfHONY) •...•.. BURTON ••••. -../---r-~ DIEDRICH) •••••. CLARK ..•••. -./---:Z--~ (MC INNIS) •.•... DOSTAL..... / _.__ - GLOCKNER... ./ ~ + (HOYT); ••••...•.• SMITH....... " -- (EDGAR) •••.•••••. SALTARELLI._/_ ~ --= DISTRICT 11 (DIEDRICH) ...••. SCHMIT. ••••. _.; ____ _ DU KE. • • . • • . . " ( Wd EDERl. •.••••• GI BBS....... .; == == DISTRICT 8 JOHNSON) ••••••• HOLM ••••••• ~ EDWARDS •••• _____ _ DIEDRICH) •••••• RILEY ••.•••• ====== 3/10/76 JOINT BOARDS DIEDRICH ..•... BATTIN •...•.• ~ __ ANTHONY) ......•. BURTON ......• _/ __ _ COLL I ~s ) ......•. BYRNE .•.••..• _v_ -- LYONS) .......••. CALLAHAN ..... _.; __ _ EWING .......... CHAPUT .••..•. _./ __ _ DIEDRICH). .....• CLARK........ ./ HOMR I GHAUSEN) .. COX .••.•••.••• -" --- CULVER .•••••• -./--- (GRIFFIN) .•.••... DAV IS .••••••• -./ -j f Gtf (Mc INN Isl ...... DOSTAL ..••••. / <~ t , ~~ (GIBBS) .••....... DUKE......... .I (GARTHE) ..•..••.. EVANS .•..•••• -../--- (MAC KA I N l ...... F 0 X ..•..••••• ---Y--- (EV AN s). · · · · · · · · ·GARTHE· • • • • • • -v--- (WI EDER).······· ·GIBBS········ ./ == GLOCKNER • • • • ' (NEVIL) •••••••••• GRAHAM ••••••• -/--- ~HOYT). • · • • · • · • • • SM I TH· • · · · • • • v == THO~) •••.••••••• KAYWOOD. • • • • • .; FOX) . ) ••••••••• ~-• • • =.I == S 0 NJ U • • • • • • • • . . MAC LA I N • • • • .1 (RYCOFF) ....•.... MC INNIS. .••• -"--- (BLACKMAN) •..... MC KNEW...... " == OLSON........ J (HOYT) ...•.•..•. SM I TH. . . • . • . • .1 == PERRY........ .I (DIEDRICH) ..•... RILEY ••.••.•• --y-== RIMA ••.•••.•• -"-__ ROGERS....... " ~EDGAR) •• ) ..•••. SALTARELLI .• J == DIEDRICH ..•... SCHMIT •.••••• _.., __ _ HOLLINDEN) SCOTT........ " I G I BBS) ..•...•... SH I PLEY .••••• _fl:_ == MC INNIS) •..... STORE •••••••• __lt_ HOLLI NDEN) SVALSTAD •••• ___:L_ == WOOD) •...•.•.••. ~ ....•••• ~ __ ARB I SO) ..•••.•.. wt I SHAU P-1 .•. -v. DUNNY) ..•...•... WINN .•..••••. -..;--- ~ --WARD ••.•..•..•. WOOD ........ ~ GRAHA~) ••••••••• YOUNG •••••••• ___L_ == EDGAR •••••••.•• SHARP. • • . • • • • ~· OTHERS l • ({ · .' I t~u 1 · (.. ~ . (J 1Jt (~<-G I L:"·' "I .~ I f'.,.I ..... : t;1 (4l'f ,." ·,_, _, ; \.l . .' f I ' ,• J I I / ·. ,I:'. ~f· v .... ' _I. . lj HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS CLARKE TAYLOR BROWN (' l A..-' ..... i1f. WOODRUFF \l.{v~ · ·.···~EWING 01 .;/' -, t ·: .. HOH EN ER · .. , • t a_,,1 •• ) HOWARD . V~ . HUNT I. ' ' •. ,._/ KEITH J J '~ .. -l KENNEY tJ· LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVENS TRAVERS / v / MEETING DATE March 10, 1976 TI ME 7: 30 P. m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 <.~~<.) DISTRICT 1 '7<--n-\ RIMA ••..•.•• _..L.. ~ _ (nTEDR ICH) .••..• BATTIN..... ~ __ ( .... , .. ,~NS) ...••..•.. GARTHE ••.•• ~ Y-__ (EDGAR) .•••••..•• SHARP....... V" .:j__ __ *t'-#(4) DISTRICT 2 . ~~to-1~-9\. (LYONS)·········· CALLAHAN .•• ~ .t.,_ . tJ (EWING) .•..•••••• CHAPUT...... ......--~ ~ ( D I ED R I CH) •••••• CLARK. • • . • • • -V N ~ ~GARTtiEl •.••••.. EVANS •••.••• ~ t Y THO~) •••••••.•.• KAYWOOD •.•• ____J£:_ ~ FOX) •••.••••••.. MAC l(A I H ••• ~ ~ (HOYT) ••••••••••• SM I TH........ v-' _J__ ~ PERRY •..•.•• ~ __& -L- ( HOLL I NDEN) ••••• SCOTT ••••••• ~ __hL += WARD) ••••••••.•• WOOD ••.••••• ___k::::_ Y ' ~DUNN~) .•••.•.•.• WINN •••••.•• ~ __bl GRAHAM} ••..•••• YOUNG ••.•.•• _.k:::__ ~ ~ DISTRICT 3 (HOMRIGH(\USEN). COX ......... _J.L. ___ _ (COLLINS) .•••••. BYRNE •.••.•• ~ ___ _ CULVER..... v" (GRIFFIN). •..•.. DAVIS •••..•. ~ == == (GARTH EL .••.••• EVANS •.•••.• ~ ___ _ (MAC KA IN) •••••• FOX ••.••.••. __lL_ (NEVIlJ •••••••••• GRAHAM ••••• ~ == == (THOM) ••••••••••• KAYWOOD •••• _k::::: ___ _ (soNJU) ••• \ •••••• MAC LAIN ••• ~ ---- (BLACKMANJ •••.•• MC KNEW •••• ~ ___ _ OLSON •••••.• ~ (DIEDRICH) •••••• SCHMIT •••••• ~ == == (GIBBS) .......... SllIPLE't! .••• ~ ___ _ ~HOLLINDEN) •••• SVALSTAD ••• ~ ___ _ WOOD) ........... \·JARS:". .. • • • • V-- ARB I SOL ....... \+EISllAUPT .• ~== == DISTRICT 5 ~ct.o.J ot0Co) (RYCKOFF)) .••••• MC INNIS ••• ~ __L_ i_ (DIEDRICH •••••• RILEY •••.••• ~ __:/__ _r ROGERS. •.••. ~ _L_ _y__ DISTRICT 6 (MC INNIS) ...... STORE •••••.. _k:::_ ___ _ (DIEDRICH) •••••• BATTIN. .•••. ~ ___ _ RIMA •.••••.• ~ ___ _ DISTRICT 7 ~~.i-'1 ~ 3'D(w EVANS ....••••. GARTHE ••••. ~ .Y__ ..:i_ t -HONY) .•••••• BURTON..... v-_j__ _j_ ~DR I CH). • • • • • CLARK . • • • • • _k:::_ 1_ _:::f__ (MC INN Is) •••.•• DOSTAL •••.• ~ .:f._ ~ G LOCKNER . • • _k:::::._ L_ .:f__ (HOYT))· •••.•••..• SMITH······· a.-.-----1'{ N (EDGAR •••.•••••• SALTARELLI. ~ .:f___ ~ DISTRICT 11 (DIEDRICH) •••••• SCHMIT...... V-___ _ DUKE........ ~ (WIEDERL ••••••• GIBBS .••••.• ~==== D STRICT 8 3/10/76 JOINT BOARDS DI EDR IC~ ...••. BATTIN ••..••• ~ __ ANTHONY ....•••. BURTON....... V"" __ COLLI ~S .....•.. BYRNE •••••.•• ~ __ LYONS) .......••. CALLAHAN ••••• ~ __ EWING ...•...•.• CHAPUT •.••••• ~ __ DIEDRICH). ...•.• CLARK •••••••• ~ HOMRIGHAUS EN) •• COX. •.••...••• ____k:::_ == CULVER ••••••• _lL:_ (GR I FF I N ) ••••..•• DAV I S •••••••. ~ -- (MC INNIS l ...... DOSTAL ....... ~ :Ji'~~ (GIBBS) •••....... DUKE......... v ( GARTHE) •••.••••. EVANS •••••••• ---V -- ( MAC KA I N l ...... F 0 X • • • • • • • • • • ~ -- (EV ANS).········ ·GARTHE· • • • • • • ~ == (WIEDER)·········GIBBS········~ __ GLOCKNER •••• ~ (NEVIL) •••••••••• GRAHAM ••••••• ~ == rn~s) ........... KAYWOOD •••••• ---><C_ --!HOYT). • • · • · • • • • • SM I TH· • · · • • · • ~ -- ............ t4AG l<A I N •••• --=- SO NJ U) .•••..•••• MAC LAIN •••• ~ -- (RYCOFF) •..•....• MC INNIS. •••• ~ -- (BLACKMAN) •••.•• MC KNEW •.•••• ~ == OLSON •••••••• __k::::. __ (.....,) .......... 11\IFJO ....... ~ __ PERRY •••••••• ~ (DIEDRICH) ••.••. RILEY ••.•.••• ~== RIMA ..••.•••• ~ __ ROGERS....... i.......- ~EDGAR) •• )" ..•.. SALTARELLI •• ~ -- DIEDRICH ...... SCHMIT ••••••• ~ __ HOLL I NDEN) SCOTT •••.•••• ~ __ ~-6 I BBS~-........ ~ Sii I PLEY...... - MC INNIS) .•.•.• STORE •••••••• ~ -- HOLLINDEN) SVALSTAD •••• ~ == (WOOD) ••..•.•.•.. WARD •••••.••• ~ __ (ARB I so) ...••••.• WE I 811AtJfi'T ••• =-.JL.._ (DUNN~) •..•••••.. WINN ••••.•••• ~== ~~) •••••••••• ..4~88B-. • • • • • • • • - ~ GRAHA~) ••••••••• YOUNG........ ,,._.--== EDGAR •••••••••• SHARP. • . • . • • • ,,_.. OTHERS HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS CLARKE TAYLOR BROWN WOODRUFF EWING HOH EN ER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY. LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVENS TRAVERS .. '6-a) (6-b) 3/10/76 Joint Mtg. Report of the Join t Chairman Reported that Mr . Harper and he and members of locally-e l ected officials committee (listed names) met with Win Adams in Sacramento, and another Board member a nd director of the SWRCB . Said they met to comprise committee. Elected officials & GM met in Jl!Orning and had luncheon meeting with Win Adams. Said after much discussion, it was conc l uded that with the efforts of the e lected officials throughout most of the sanitary districts and the rapport of the Genera l Manager, that the avenue to the SWRCB members is already there. Their concern was that our efforts would be better directed and concentrated on our elected officials in Washington, n.c . Said it seems like our little efforts sometimes get l ,ost in the shuffle back there. Unless it is a problem of major important anc e to everybody on the West Coast, one sanitary district doesn't have much chance of getting things done. Advised that they have asked elected officials and General Managers of these agencies to write down their thoughts and send to us and we would coTl!liile a recommendation here to either expand committee or redirect committee. Wil l send materia l out to Directors before next meeting . FAH added that along the line of getting our Congressional delegates to function in these areas of interest here i n California, it appears that we are just going to have to try to develop a lot closer relationship with some of these Congressmen . We have the l arges t state delegation in Washington. Possibly, this comm ittee working with the State Board could develop positions that would be of state-wide interest and then attempt to get the attention of the Ca l ifornia de l egati on . Said he thought that this was the challenge that seemed to come out loud and clear. Said there seems to be some differences between the Gov ernor 's office and some of the membe rs on the State Board at the present time . Things should gel within next six months . Working through Governor 's office will get the attention of California de l egation . but will take a lot of work to get this to come about . (Called E .C. mtg . later. See item after #14 -b .) Report of the General Manager FAH advised that we have been reporting every month regarding the pilot unit on the JPL-ACTS process. Hope to have it in operation the end of this mont h . Have it staffed and have been working out the bugs in the process . Most of the equipme nt is here now . Said h e thought the Directors wou l d be very pleased with th e whole unit. Cou l d maybe show some slides of the l ayo ut at the next meeting . Said this demonstrates that something can be built in a very short period of time once the agency is given the l ati tude to move ahead . Said h e hopes we have come up with a process that is very worthwhile. Also advised that by the 26th of this month we hope to be paying the bills on a biweekly basis . Listing of bills wi l l then be mailed wi th agenda . Reported that staff is beginning to work on budgets. Will be presenting things to Directors in the next coup l e months on areas we should be moving ahead . Advised that State h as certified to EPA a considerable amount of money fo r Step 2 grant--des ign phase of 75 MGD Activated Sludge Plant. Have solicited proposals from numerous engineering fi rms and will be coming to Board with recomme ndation, maybe in April . FAH a l so advised that h e has been invited by EPA , at their expense, to go to Russia for a symposium in July and with the Board's permission, is planning on going . .. (6-c) (9) (9-d) (9-e) (9-n) (13) (14) Report of the Genera l Counsel TLW briefly reported that with respect to District 2, we have all but concluded the acquisition of the necessary right of way for the Santa Ana River Interce ptor . Acquired entire right of way without a single condenmation action. All have agreed in principal . CONSENT CALENDAR Questioned whether the insurance requirements were in the specs. Was answered, yes but WNC explained the incorrect limit was the staff's error . Moved & seconded item. Asked who were the employees going to conference and who so many? FAH exp lained that there were three operational people and three from engineering department and himself. Said this is a once a year type meeting and is state-wide . We generally send 10 people but because of location we cut back to 7 . Said these are people that are involved in the industrial waste and some of the engineering aspects, as wel l as · operations people . Is a three-day fair l y concentrated meeting. Don't often have meeting in Lake Tahoe but will meet jointly with Nevada group. Asked if there was any kind of control on expenses and was told there was. Asked for projected cos t and FAH estimated between $1500-2000. Item was then moved, seconded & carried. Culver said he was shocked at differe nce in bid results and hoped specifications were clear. WNC explained that there were two ways to go--repair or replace . One contractor chose replace and Rewes-Schock chose repair . Said contractor was happy with bid . Moved & seconded to approve award. DISTRICT 5 -Chairman requested that item #20 be mo ved up on agenda due to personal reasons. (Director Rogers still recouperating from heart surgery and needed to get home early.) SEE ITEM 20 . Moved, seconded & carried by roll call vote. DISTRICT 2 -Comp & Mileage Res o Joint Chairman Winn turned meeting over to Cha irman Callahan . Callahan referred to Tom Woodruff 's l etter. Passed out copies and gave Directors a few moments to read . Said letter is se lf explanatory . Said Director Chaput challenged the l ega l ity of the vote and the attorney has made a ru ling on it. Will take somebody who vote d yes to make motion to reconsider . Said r ecord shows Chaput and Perez voted no . Callahan then cast motion to reconsider . Wood stated that motion to reconsider is normally at same meeting . Thought it would have to be another form of motion . Kaywood then stated she voted no at last meeting also . Motion to reconsider was seconded . Woodruff said his recol l ection was that there was no motion to recon?ider l ast month but the request of Director Chap ut was, in effect, a motion to reconsider . Second l y, according to the procedural rules that we have, it would still be app ro- priate to reconside r. Rol l cal l vote to reconsider Resolution No . 76 -12 -2 . Motion carried 7 :5.· Woodruff then announced that the i tern now on the floor was co nsideration of Resolution No. 76 -12-2. It was then moved to approve resolution . Motion seconded . Kaywood asked if there was any control on amo unt of expenses subm itted . Call ahan answered yes, there were controls--exact airplane fare and hotel bill, etc . Winn also added that if expense account ge ts past JWS, which is hard to do, and goes to County Auditor, he will check it out if it i s substantial . Winn · advised that h e had to pay $5 s top -off charge out of his own pocket on last trip. -2- .. Ch a put questioned wheth e r exact e :xpenses we re first class or economy? Thou ght that was one of the points missing from the resolution. Wood s t a ted that s he thou ght we shou ld have ge neral policy on that in part of this r es olution as to kinds of standards that we expect for expen s e accoW1ts . Callahan said he was in f a vor of what Director Wood_ said. Would appoint three members to set policy for e xp e nses . Chaput then said that was just half the resolution. Didn't agree with pay for meetings and doubling the potential of Directors to make money within one month. Are hiding expenses with this res olution . Wood added that her concern was a little bit about maximum. Didn't feel that we will be having five meetings a month but if we should have within next year or two, thought Directors would come back and then change this policy immediate ly. Was concerned about total compensation per month or per year but is willing to go along with policy and see how it works . If in one y e ar it is obvious it has been abused, have faith that Directors wou ld come back and change it. Winn indi cated that there would be a nominal number of additional committees that would be appointed. Questioned ma ximums--Woodruff said is for four meetings and four days service per month . After that not compensated . Is for everybody except the Joint Chairman for Joint Meetings. Called for the question. Rol l call vote on Resolution 76-12 -2 . Carried 8:4 . (14-b) DISTRICT 2 Request of Garden Grove Sanitary District referred to Executive Committee . JOINT CHAIRMAN WINN then ca lled a meeting of the Executive Committee for Tuesday,March 30th at 5:30 p.m. and invited Directors Culver and Sval stad to attend. The Building Corrnnittee wou ld a l so be meeting on the 30th. Building Committee members also invited to Exec. Comm. meeting--Culver, Burton, Glockner, Graham, and Store . (26) DISTRICT 1 Saltare lli stated that he didn't think that some people should do the s ame work as others and not get paid. It was moved and seconded to approve Resolution No. 76-11-1. Roll call vote. Carried 3:1. (29) DISTRICT 7 -Annexation policy Chairman Garthe took over meeting. Smith moved Reso lution 76-39 -7. Motion seconded. He then stated that with regard to this item would l ike to yield to fellow councilman Perez who has spent many hours on this. Said that what he had to say relat e d to annexati on fee also. Perez then submitted check sheet to be recorded in official minutes. Went through each point on sheet (10 points). Cal l ed attention to the Special Me eting report prepared by staff dated January 30. Said he would like to point out to Dire ctors that on prepaid connection charges for the parcels within the proposed a nn e xation the amount to be credited in connec tion to the system in the a mount of $250 wi ll res ult in a subsidy of $106,250 . Asked if this has been the policy of the Districts in a ny other ins t ance? Submitte d this for reas ons of opposition. -3- Perez then ca ll e d to the a tt ention of the proponents and the Directors a memorandum from the City of Orange. Said i t is not our i ntent to oppose the needed service in this area. Feel that the City of Orange can a nd will provide the needed sanit a ry sewer system an d this request is an attempt to a lleviate the inevitab l e an d logi cal annexation to the City o f Orange. Smith then stated he would like to revi ew the history of this s ituation. Sai d a few years ago he had been on t h e Sanitation Distr ict's Board for six years . There was much discussion regarding sewers of OPA area. Was brought up many times to District to do something. Never got any r esponse from Di s t r ict that they were prepared to h e lp provide sewers in that are a, so City of Orange studied an d studied the area and spent ma ny doll ars to provide sewers for the area as the District was unable to provide . (Was n ear tears h ere !) District wen t a long with this . They approved the sewer system size . Said they fee l very strongly in Orange about this! Even if bond issue passes, that probab ly wo n't be t he en d of it!! (Was that a threat?) If this is a pproved, is not r i ght and is no t fai r . Presented li s t of more f ac t s for the record. Burton then referred to page 8 of the Manager 's Report. Rea d item. Tilen ref erred to point #10 of document submi tted by City of Or ange . Read. "Tile proposed annexation fee of $828 .00 per acre will be inequitable to those that have paid the c urrent ann exation fee of $1,029.00 per acre , unless appropriate refunds a re made." Asked if th ere h a d been annexati on fees paid of $1029 . an d if so is th e re a contemplation on the part of staff to r eimburse t hose ? JWS answered that no a nn exations h a ve been consummated at $1029 figure. FAH then further exp l ained the Districts' uniform annexation policy -Tile assets of the Distri ct minus liability divided by number of acres in the Sanitation Di s trict. District 7 is the only Di s t rict that h as this unusual situation. In their asse ts have inc lude d assessment district sewers that were constructed by Di s trict and paid for by individual property owne rs within the District . Tilese are local sewers. Other San i tation Districts do not have anything i n their books. Going by the defi nition tha t we h ave u sed in the pas t, we have an inflated asset figure . Tilis was nothing that was paid for by the taxpayers . FAH said we fee l t o be consistent with the other San itation Dis tricts, that we should remo ve thes e local sewers b ecause they are not part of the master plan of t h e District . That is why we are recommen.ding that this be remove d. Burton ·then stated that if the Boar d was sti ll cons idering ite m #2 9, didn 't think the docume nts from Orange were pertinent to that item. Dostal then asked wh a t the last acreage fee was that was charged -answere d $690/acre. Do have mon ey now in trust for pending annexation at rate of $1029 . FAH further advised that those sewers are not maintained by Sanitation Districts, are maintained by Sewer Maintenance Di s t ri ct . Have kept them on our books and District 7 holds title. Woodruff the n stated that valuation of sew ers that h ave been constructed through a s sessment district procee dings h ave some similar ma rket . We use them in two different ways . (1) We s till carry them on our books as assets in terms of total assets. (2) Formula used for determining ann exation f ees has been very simple. Determin e d it not correct to in clude these assets in tha t particular formula. Devised strictly to cal cul ate a f ee. Because asse ts were not a cquire d with Di s tri ct funds and yet we do own them, so for accounting purposes we are carryin g them on the books. All other districts determine their annexation fee on b as is of assets minus liabi lities divide d by acreage. Said when that mi scal culation was determined, that is when we felt we were to reduce it. Sa ltarelli asked who was liable to r e pair thos e sewers . Was answered the 7th SMD . Also asked if this policy was one of the reasons Di s trict 7 is strongest fin ancially . Answered i t has no be aring. -4 - Called for the Question re Re solution No. 76-39 -7. Roll call vote. Carried 6:1. ·o ~) DISTRICT 7 -OPA Burton questioned Woodruff's letter and asked him to clarify paragraph 1. TLW said that memo was written Jan. 21st and question was simp ly to come to District for annexation. Said that request has changed now. Clark moved we approve the annexation. Said this annexation is to be reviewed on basis of providing a sewer system and any conflict of City boundaries is probably in the realm of LAFC. Besides, the bond issue has to be by a 2/3 vote of the people and think the r e quest here is simply to ge t this moving to LAFC where the proper authority will be sitting to determine the problem with the City. Motion seconded by Burton. Perez reiterated that .their arguments have been submitted in writing in opposition to both items 29 and 30(c) and called attention to that evidence and their reasons for opposing the proposal. Sa l tarelli stated that he could not support the motion. Said it was toe obvious to him that the proponents have devised a very careful legal measure to avoid annexation to City of Orange, as we ll as Orange has done. 1\\lo cross currents. We have an obligation to provide our vote for equity and tax efficiency. This can be accomplished and sewers can be provided in a less expensive way . Said he was opposed to passing bond for a fee. Could support a bond for a sewer line but think they should pay for annexation fee in cash, not bond and pass it on to future owners. For us to approve 2.50 -4.50 per $100 A.V. is not tax efficiency, which is who can provide it and how can it be provided at lowest cost to taxpayers. Burton stated if this pass es tonight and they go to people and are not successful in annexation and bond vote, they will carry total cost and wHl··not reflect on Sanitation District No. 7. Woodruff added that whole expense of this including construction and administrative is that of owners . Agreed with Saltarel li that it is not tax efficient but thought people should be able to vote th ems elves what - ever kind of tax they want . Peggy McElligott responded to Saltarelli. Said the peopl e here involved with are many rather than a developer or single annexation parce l. Because of that in trying to raise the $828 per acre becomes a massive job. Almost impossible to accomplish a cash annexation with the number of people. This is about the only method that we have been able to evolve that provides a so lution to a real problem in that area that has been existing for a l ong time . The only way that these people will get sewers is if they can come together and do it, not inch by inch . Said she has been invol ved with sewers for 20 years, and has taken a long time on this. There is nothing set forth to take care of this type o f problem. Have been looking at growth and deve l opment. Are not looking at that but l ooking at needs of existing p e ople and property. A law real ly hasn't been resolved to take care of it. Have tried to come up with e asiest possible way for these peop l e and people in the future . Said she realizes what Saltarelli is saying. Problem, unfortunately, is that what you are asking in terms of annexation charge is permanent right to use capital facilities of Sanitation District. That right goes with the land, not with particular owner. Value of the property is determine d, in part, by availability of sewer to that property. Property owner at any point in time doesn 't always have a choice of whether he can have sewers. Can 't give man a choice in the future of whether he wants sew e rs or not . We have to face realities of many people not a few. With re ga rd to th e vote, there a r e a large number of p e ople here at Board me eting from -5- OPA who are intere ste d. Th e se peop le are v e ry definit e ly willing to go out and talk to their nei ghbors and help ma ke the ir de ci s i on. 2/3 vot e is a rough ·· one. We know of no othe r real fe as ible way of doing it t h a t i s not infl a t e d. This is the lea st exp ensive way that we can evolve a nd app e ars to be the fairest from the standpoint of the Sanitation Districts. Do es provide fund a nd fin a ncing. Sa ltarelli then stated that (1) we have an obligation to all future taxpayers of this District. Th e se people and those who will be future members who will purchase this property. Pe ople who live the re now will pay nothing. If we h a ve a health problem now, is re as on a ble to as sum e tha t value of the property will be imm e di a tely increased . Person who comes in is now paying higher price and will be paying annexation fee which made that fee higher also. (2) Borrowing is a way of life. Will vote for this issue if p e ople will borrow $828 and pay. (3) If any of these people who own their own hom e s cannot afford $828 for anne xation, then simple ari the matic tells us they c a nnot afford 40% incre a se in tax rate. Smith a dded that they felt that there would be the least cost to the residents if they would cooperate with local entity of government. City can help with engineering, administrative and even in local lines. Even in the instances of connection charges. City can help provide services. City of Orange has the local s ewers. Th i s proposal will not give them the local sewers. Burton stated that his city believes bonding is a way of life for schools, etc. Saltarelli dis a greed with connection betwe e n that and this proposal. Called for the Question. Roll Call vote. Carried 4:3. Smi t h the n s t a ted the City of Oran ge still will cooperate if el e ction s hould f ail. (32) DISTRICT 7 -Oth e r bus iness Re ques ted that staff prepare r esolution for Di s trict 7 to bring the m up to identical re s olutions f or Dir ectors comp e ns ation and mil eage a s Di stricts 1, 2, 3 & 11 and put on April agenda. -6- (~,. ...... February 11, 1976 Annexation to Sanitation District #7 requires election (simple majority) .., and payment of annexation fees $828. 00 per acre· .. 2) General Obligation Bond Issue passage for payment of Annexation Fees only is not feasable. ·3)General Obligation Bond Issue as proposed in the amount of $1,140,000 requires a 2/3 majority. t; f}Proposed Bond Issue does not provide any local sewers. r)The statement by the proponents of this Annexaiion and Bond Issue relative .to "the District's policy of providing trunk sewers within one-quarter mile of all properties" is not a guaranteed right of all properties within the District. ~Annexation to.Sanit~tion District #7 and passage of the proposed Bond Issue would impose a tax rate of $2.6954 per $100/A.V. but would not provide any local sewer system or physical connections to the trunk sewer system. 7)Annexation with complete sewer system would cost approximately $2,292,000 and would result in a tax rate of approximately $4.40 ±;100 A.V. ) At the present time Orange County Sanitation District #7 has no vested rights in those portions of reaches 17 or 18 constructed by the city of Orange. )The proposed Improvement District is entirely within the official sphere of influence of the city of Orange as adopted by the Orange County L.A.F.C.O. 0The proposed annexation fee of $828.00 per acre will be inequitable to those that have paid the current annexation fee of $1,029.00 per ~acre, unless appropriate refunds are made. January 22, 1976 · STATUS OF TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER Trunk sewers are presently completed to Fairhaven and the Flood Control Channel at Esplanad~. (Reach 12) Design of reaches 13 thru 16 of the trunk sewer from Fairhaven and Esplanade to Santiago Canyon Road and Linda Vista is now complete. The District Engineer will present the plans to the Board for approval 2/11/76 and ask for authroization to advertise for bids. This would accomplish the completion of the trunk system to meet the downstream end of the trunk sewer the City built in conjunction with Klug Development by some time this fall. / . ~--~::==;;...,..,-...~ ..... - The City. fo Orange and the developers, Klu·g Development and Broadmoor Homes, Inc. have constructed.two sections of the "Master Planned". trunk sewer. The first sectio~ extends_ from Santiago Canyon Road and Linda Vista to the intersection of Ora_rige Park Blvd. and Frank St. The second section extends from· a· point approximately 400' south of Meads Ave. and Handy Creek, along Handy Creek to a point approximately 725' south of Amapolla. From the upstream end of tpe first section at Orange Park Blvd. and Frank St. to the down stream end of the second section, a local 12" sewer has been constructed to connect the two sections of master planned trunk sewer main. During the design period of the first section we considered building it along Handy Creek from Santiago Canyon Road, south-eastward, however, the proposed alignment traversed an extensive multiplicity of ownerships which would have required a considerable period of time just to acquire the necessary right of way. We, therefore, constructed it within existing rodad rights of way except at the southwest corner of Santiago Canyon Road and Orange Park Blvd. and ended it at Orange Park Blvd. and Frank St. The local 12" sewer main which·we constructed from this point to the beginning of the second reach was also built primarily within existing road rights of way. The capacity of this 12" main is equal to approximately 40% of the trunk sewer. This will allow a considerable portion of the contributary area upstream of this section to be served before it becomes necessary to construct the parallel section of the trunk sewer. All of these sewer mains belong to the city of Orange. They were built by ·the city with sewer construction funds generated by the city, jointly by agreement with -....,, the Klug Development and Broadmoore Homes, Inc. The County of orange has no financial investment or other rights in these facilities. we did construct certain p~rtions of the mains to the design criteria of the adopted Master Plan of Sanitation District No. 7. . . This is int~n~ed at some future date to allow the city to "sell" these sections to District 7 at the city's option. The District has no vested rights in these sewers.- i/VF:bm c 1-r-Y bF DISTRICT NO. 1 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 2 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 3 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 5 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 6 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 7 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 11 Di n'ctors present: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA .~ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING March 10, 1976 -7:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California ROLL CALL Kerm Rima (Chairman), Robert Battin,. John Garthe, and James Sharp None Michael Callahan (Chairman), Dale Chaput, Ralph Clark, Vernon Evans, Miriam Kaywood, Donald Fox, Don Smith, Bob Perry, George Scott, Donald Winn, Frances Wood, and Robin Young None Phillip Cox (Chairman), Edward Byrne, Norman Culver, Jesse Davis, Vernon Evans, Donald Fox, Beth Graham, Miriam Kaywood, Alice MacLain, Thomas McKnew, Richard Olson, Laurence Schmit, Norma Gibbs, Bernie Svalstad, Frances Wood, and Gilbert Arbiso None Don Mcinnis (Chairman), Thomas Riley, and Howard Rogers None John Store (Chairman), Robert Battin, and Kerm Rima None John Garthe (Chairman), John Burton, Ralph Clark, Mil~n Dostal, Francis Glockner, Don Smith, and Donald Saltarelli None Laurence Schmit (Ch~1 i rnwn), llcnry Oukc, and Norma Cibbs 3/10/76 STAFF ·MEMBERS PRESENT: .• OTHERS PRESENT: Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Secreta~y, William Clarke, , Bruce Taylor, Rita Brown, and Hilary Eitzen '. ·Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Conrad Hohener, Harvey Hunt, Milo Keith; Gail Lynch, Donald Martinson, Donald . Stevens, Bill Hartge, Lloyd Coffelt, · Ralph Shook·, Jess Perez, Peggy McElligott·, .:· George Rach, and Lowell Kavenge A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and li of Orange County, California, was held at 7:30 p.m. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation, the roll was tailed and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District' .s·· Board. * * * * * * * * ~ * * Moved, seconded, and duly carried: DISTRICTS 1,2,3 & 7 Excerpts re Board Appointment That the minute excerpts from the Cities of Fountain Valley, Orange and Tustin, dated March 10, 1976, be received and ordered filed; and that the following representatives be seated as members of the Boards: City Fountain Valley Orange Tustin DISTRICT 1 AEEroval of minutes held February 11, DISTRICT 2 ~proval of minutes held February 11, DISTRICT 3 AEEroval of minutes held February 11, DISTRICT 5 Approval of minutes District Active Alternate 2 George Scott Al Holl.inden 3 Bernie.Svalstad Al Hollinden 2 & 7 Don E. Smith Robert D. Hoyt 1 James B. Sharp Richard Edgar 7 Donald Saltarelli Richard Edgar Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the minutes of the regular meeting 1976 be approved as mailed. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the minutes of the regular meeting 1976 be approved as mailed. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the minutes of the regular meeting 1976 be approved as mailed. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the minutes of the regular meeting held February 11, 1976, and the minutes of the special meeting held March 3, 1976, be approved as mailed. -2- i • ~ .. 3/10/76 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes .That the minutes of the regular meeting· held February 11; 1976 be approved as·mailed. '. DISTRICT 'NO. 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held February 11, 1976. be ·approved as mailed. DISTRICT NO. 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held February 11, 1976 ·be approved as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman The Joint Chairman reported that the first meeting of the Committee of Locally Elected Officials representing TRI-TAC agencies had been held in Sacramento with Win Adams, Chairman of the State Water Resources Control Board. Also in attendance were managers of the agencies represented on the Committee by locally elected officials. A survey is being compiled regarding the areas in which the Committee might be most effective to enable a final determination of the Committee's goals and objectives. It was the concensus of those in attendance that communication at the State level between local agencies and the State Board is very good and that perhaps the Committee's efforts should be directed toward the Federal level. The Joint Chairman then called an Executive Committee meeting for Tuesday, March 30th at S:~O p.m. and invited Directors Culver and Svalstad to attend and participate. He announced that the Building Committee would be meeting at the same time and also invited them to attend the Executive Committee meeting. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager The General Manager reiterated the con- sensus of the Committee of Locally Elected Officials that there exists a real need to develop a close liason with the California congressional delegation in order that our voice may be heard in Washington as a united effort of California State and local agencies. Mr. Harper briefly reviewed the progress of the JPL-ACTS Pilot Project and advised that it is scheduled for start-up during the next month. The General Manager reported that the State has certified step two grant eligibility on the first incremental unit of secondary treatment at Plant 2 (75 MGD Activated Sludge Plant) which will allow the Districts to proceed with the design phase. The staff has solicited proposals from several engineering firms in accordance with the recently adopted pro- cedures, and a recommendation will he forthcoming at the April meeting of the Joint Boards. -3- . 1 3/10/76 . r M~. Harper also advised that he had beeh invited by the Environmental Protection Agency, at their expense, to participate in a symposium on wastewater treatment in Russia, tentatively· scheduled for two weeks in ·July, and w~th the Boards' permission would plan to attend. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Counsel The 'General Counsel reported briefly wit~ respect to right.of way acqu1s1tion in connccti6n'with construction of the ' Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, which will apparently be obtained without riecessity ot condemnati6n actiori. ALL DISTRICTS Certification of the General Manager received and ordered filed Moved~ second~d, and duly carried: That the certification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills. appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he and ordered filed. recommends ,,authori za ti on for payment, be received ALL DISTRICTS Approval of Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund check registers Moved, s~conded, and duly carried: That th~ Districts' Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund accounts payable check registers be approved for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and that the County Auditor' be authorized and directed ~o pay: Joint Operating Capital Outlay Revolving $ 146,549.63 l,409,981.28 $1,556,530.91 in accordance with the claims listed on Pages "I-1" through "I-4", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of check registers That the District's Operating Fund and Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund accounts payable check registers be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay: Operating Fund $ 73.32 Facilities Revolving Fund 918,315.76 $918,389.08 in accordance with the claims listed on Page ''Il-1", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -4- 3/10/76 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of check registers That the District's Operating Fund and Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund accounts payable check registers be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay: Operating Fund $ 17.50 Facilities Revolving Fund 655 '801.14 $655,818.64 in accordance with the claims listed on Page "II-1", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of check register That the District's Operating Fund accounts payable check register be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $524.75, in accordance with the claims listed on Page "Il-2", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of check registers That the District's Operating Fund and Facilities Revolving Fund accounts payable check registers be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay: Operating Fund $ 524.50 Facilities Revolving Fund 119,806.27 $120,330.77 in accordance with the claims listed on Page "III", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of check register That the District's Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund accounts payable check register be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $10,627.25, in accordance with the claims listed on Page "III", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file letter from City of Huntington Beach re Job No. P2-8-8 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the letter from the City of Huntington Beach, dated February 18, 1976, relative to inclusion of certain street improvements in the contract for Brookhurst Street Improvements, Job No. P2-8-8, for which the City will reimburse the Districts, be received and ordered filc<l. -5- 3/10/76 ' t ALL DISTRICTS ·Moved,' seconded,, and dul.y carried: .Making a Negative Declaration ·~ and approving plans and That the Boards of Directors adopt specifications for Job No. Resolution No. ·76-41, making a' Negative P2-8-8 Declar~tion and providing for noiicc theteof; and approving plans and.speci- .. fications for Brookhurst Stre~t Improvements, Job No. ·p2-8-8, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on April .6-, 1976; said specification and proposal documents to provide· separate bid items for impiovements to be performed on behalf of the City of.Huntington Bcrich · and reimbursed to the Districts by .the City.. Certified c:opy of this resolution is attached he1eto and made a part cif these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Awarding contract for New Water Well No. 1 at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-049 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-42, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, ·and awarding contract for New Water Well No. 1 at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-049, to Mccalla Bros., in the amount of $42,046.00. Certified copy of this resolution. is attached he~eto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Job No. PW-050 Followi~g a clarification of the reason for the proposed reduction of insurance requirements for Job No. PW-050, it was• moved, seconded, and duly carried~ That Change Order No. 1 to th~ plans and specifications for Installation of. Foul Air Treatment at Plant No. 2, Headworks "C", Job No. PW-050, authorizing a reduction in the insurance coverage requirements for the contract with Skippei & Company, be approved. -Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made·a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing the Joint Chairman and seven employees to attend the 48th Annual Conference of the CWPCA at Lake Tahoe; and authorizing reimbursement of expenses Following a brief discussion concerning the request for authorization to attend the 48th Annual CWPCA Conference, and the anticipated cost associated therewith, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Joint Chairman and seven staff employees be authorized to attend the 48th Annual Conference of the California Water Pollution Control Associa- tion to be held April 14-16, 1976, at Lake Tahoe; and, FURTHER MOVED: Tirnt reimbursement for travel, lodging, meals and incidental expenses incurred in connection with attendance at said conference, be authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file letter from IRWD re alternate connection points to the Districts' outfall system Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the letter from Irvine Ranch Water District, dated March 4, 1976, relative to alternate connection points to the Sanitation Districts' outfall system, and costs associated therewith, pursuant to the agreement between the respective parties dated .fanuary 12, 1971, be rccejvc<l an<l ordered filed. -6- ALL DISTRICTS .Authorizing the General Manager to engage John Carollo Engineers to prepare a report relative to IRWD's request re alternate connection points to the Districts' outfali system costs of said study and report District. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file financial report of Director of Finance for quarter ending December 31, 1975 ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file letter from Guaranty Chevrolet withdrawing 3/10/76 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the General Manager be authorized to engage John Carollo Engineers to prepare a report relative to Irvine Ranch Water District's request for information relative to alternate connection points to the Distri~ts' out~all system, all · to be borne by the Irvine Ranch Water Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the financial report of the Director of Finance for the quarter ending December 31, 1975, be received and ordered filed. Foflowing a brief report, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: bid on Specification No. A-080 That the letter from Guaranty Chevrolet dated February 19, 1976, withdrawing their bid on Specification No .. A-080 due-to an error thereon, be received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Rejecting all bids received December 2, 1975, re Specification No. A-080 ALL DISTRICTS Awarding purchase of Six (6) 1/2 Ton Pickup Trucks, Specification No. A-080 Rebid Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That all bids received en December 2, 1975, for Six (6) 1/2 Ton Pickup Trucks, Specification No. A-080, be rejected. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the bid tabulation and recommendation for purchase of Six (6) 1/2 Ton Pickup Trucks, Specification No. A-080 Rebid, be received and ordered filed, and that award of said purchase to Santa Ana Dodge in the amount of $26,076.00, be authorized. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and unanimously carried: Reading proposed Ordinance No. 509 by title only That Ordinance No. 509, an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 505, as amended, and Ordinance No. 508, Pertaining to Connection Charges, be read by title only, and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. DISTRICT 5 Adopting Ordinance No. 509 by the following roll call vote: There being no further written or oral comments on proposed Ordinance No. 509, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried AYES: Directors Don Mcinnis, Thomas Riley, and Howard Rogers NOES: None ABSENT: None -7- 3/10/76 • t Th~t the Board of Directors adopt Ordinance No. 509 an Ordinance Amending Ordinance.No. 505, as amended, and Ordinan~e No. 508, Pertaining to Connection Charges. DISTRICT 5 Moved, ~econded, and duly carried~ Adjournment . . Tirnt this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation Distri~t No .. s b~ adjouine4. The.Ch~irma~· then. declared the meeting so adjourne~ at 8:06 p.m., March 10, .1976. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 3 .to the plans and specifications That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and for £ontract No. 2-14-4 specifications for Santa Ana River Inter- .. ceptor Sewer, Reach 5 ,. Contract No. 2-14-4, authorizing a change in the type of concrete pipe, at no cost to the District, be approved .. Copy of this change order is attached hereto and mad~ a part of these m{nutes. DISTRICT 2 Authorizing execution of Pipe- Line License agreement with The ATSF Railway Company, re Contract No. 2-14-3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-43-2, approving and authorizing execution of Pipe-Line License agreement ~ith The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company in conn.ection with construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor Connector, Reaches 2, 3 and 4, Contract. No. 2-14-3; and authorizing payment in the amount of $150:00 for said license. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Authorizing execution of Pipe- Line License agreement with The ATSF Railway Company, re Contract No. 2-14-5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-44-2, approving and authorizing execution of Pipe-Line License agreement with The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company in connection with construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Reaches 6, 7 and 8, Contract No. 2-14-5; and authorizing payment in the amount of $150.00 for said license. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Authorizing issuance of a change order to the emergency purchase order contract with F. B. Copk Corp. re Newhope- Placentia Trunk Sewer Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That issuance of a change order to the emergency purchase order contract with F. B. Cook Corporation for additional work in the amount of $909.88, relative to reshaping of manhole in connection with repairs at the intersection of State College Boulevard and Orangc- thorpe (Newhopc-Placentia Trunk Sewer), be authorized. -8- DISTRICT 2 Receive and file request from C. Michael, Inc. for anncxa- . tion to the District, and refer to staff for study and · recommendation recommendation. DISTRICT 2 Reconsideration of Directors' compensation policy and affir- mation of Resolution No. 76-12-2, establishing new policy re Directors' compensation 3/10/76 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the request from C. Michael, Inc. for annexation of approximately 295.87 acres of territory to the District northerly of the Yorba Regional Park, be received, ordered filed, and referred to staff for study and Chairman Callahan distributed copies of the General Counsel's opinion relative to reconsideration of Resolution No. 76-12-2, establishing compensation and expense reim- bursement policies for Directors, which was adopted by the Board at the regular meeting on February 11th. The opinion was in response to the written request of Director Chaput that said resolution be reconsidered. After a brief review of the Counsel's opinion, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the letter dated March 3, 1976 from Director Dale Chaput requesting reconsideration of Resolution No. 76-12-2, and the General Counsel's opinion dated March 10th relative to reconsideration of said resolution, be received and ordered filed. Approving motion to reconsider Resolution No. 76-12-2 Following further comments by the General Counsel that a motion to reconsider Resolution No. 76-12-2 would be appropriate under the Districts' procedural rules, it was moved by Director Callahan and duly seconded: That the Board of Directors reconsider Resolution No. 76-12-2, establishing compensation and expense reimbursement policies for its Directors, and repealing Resolution No. 73-45-2. Following a roll call vote, the General Counsel reported that the motion to reconsider had carried by virtue of seven Directors voting in favor thereof, and five Directors voting against said resolution. Readoption of Resolution No. 76-12-2, establishing new policy re Directors' compen- sation It was then moved and seconded that the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-12-2, establishing compensation and expense reim- bursement policies for its Directors, and repealing Resolution No. 73-45-2. DISTRICT 2 Following further discussion relative to certain compensation and expense reimbursement provisions of the resolution, the question was called for and said resolution was duly adopted by roll call vote, eight Directors voting in favor thereof, and four Directors voting against adoption of said resolution. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Referring request of Garden Grove Sanitary District re waiver of sewer connection fees to Exccut i vc Conuni t tee That the letter from Garden Grove Sanitary District, dated March 9, 1976, relative to possible waiver of sewer connection fees, he recei vcd, ordered fi 1 cd, anll re fr rred to the Executive Committee for review and report back to the Bo:ir<l. -9- 3/10/76 DISTRICT 2 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: , Tilat this meeting of-the Board of Directors of County Sanitat~on District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the.meeting.so adjourned at 8:24 p.m., March 10, 1976. DISTRICT 3 Authorizing execution of agreement with Southern Pacific Transportation Co. re Contract No. 3-21-2 Moved, seconded, ~~~ duli carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution N9. 76-45-3, approving and authorizing execution of agreement with Southern Pacific Transportation Company for right of way in connection with tonstruction of the Westside Relief Interceptor, Portion of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 and 29, Contract No. 3-21-2, at no cost to the District. Certified copy of this:resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minute~. _ DISTRICT 3 Receive and file Summons and First Amended Complaint for Damages for Personal Injuries, Darryl Nasser vs. Radna Balstad, et al., re Contract No. 3-21-2, and refer to General Counsel and liabi(lty insurance carrier ' Moved~ seconded, and duly carried: That the Summons and First Amended Complaint for Damages for Personal Injuries, in Case No. 239335, Darryl Nasser vs. Radna Balstad, et al., in connection with construction of the Westside Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 and Portion of 27, Contract No. 3-21-1, be received and ordered filed, and referred to the District's General Counsel and liability insurance carrier for appropriate action. DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Awarding contract for Manhole Replacement and Repair, Contract No. 11-lR-1 Following a brief report by the Super- intendent with regard to the nature of the work to be performed under Contract No. 11-lR-1, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-46, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Manhole Replacement and Repair, Contract No. 11-lR-1, to Rewes-Schock, in the amount of $37,253.00. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:24 p.m., March 10, 1976. DISTRICT 11 Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 11-4 R Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications to Remodel NewLmd-Ham:i 1 ton Pumping Station Pacilitics, Contract No. 11-4R, authorizing an addition of $1,214.95 to the contract with Clifford L. Thompson Construction Comp~rny for additional block wall and excavation ~rnd grading, and granting a time extension of 30 calendar days to ~1ccomp- l i sh said work, be approved. Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -10- DISTRICT 11 Adjournment 3/10/76 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:24 p.m., March 10, 1976. DISTRICT 6 Approving uniform Directors' mileage expe~se reimbursement policy Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-51-6, amending Resolution No. 73-52-6 to provide for uniform Directors' mileage expense reimbursement for each District of the Joint Administrative Organization. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 6 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:27 p.m. DISTRICT 1 Referring letter from City of Santa Ana re Raitt Street Trunk Sewer to staff Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the letter from the City of Santa Ana dated February 23, 1976, relative to construction of the Raitt Street Trunk Sewer northerly of Sunflower Avenue, be received, ordered filed and referred to staff. DISTRICT 1 Establishing new policy re Directors' compensation Following a brief discussion, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-11-1, establishing the compensation and expense reim- bursement policies for its Directors, and repealing Resolutions Nos. 63-128 and 68-3-1. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m., March 10, 1976. DISTRICT 7 Authorizing acceptance of Director's Deed from Cal Trans, re Contract No. 7-1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-47-7, authorizing acceptance of Director's Deed from the State of California, Department of Transportation, for acqu1s1t1on of excess property adjacent to the San Diego Freeway and abutting the District's casement for the Gisler-Red Hill Trunk SL'\vCr, Contr:H.::t No. 7-1, :it no cost to the Distr:ict. Certi- fied copy of this resolution .is attach("c.l hereto :ind m:1dc a part of th("se minutes. -11- 3/10/76 DISTRICT 7 Authorizing execution of an agreement with Southern Pacific Transportation Company re. Contract No. 7-6-7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt 'Resolution No. 76-48-7, approving and . authorizing execution of agreement with . ·Southern Pacific Transportation Company , for right of way in connection with construction of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 11 and Portion of Reach 12, Contract No. 7-6-7; and authorizing payments in the amounts of $40,000.00. for permanent right o'f. way and $3,086.25 for ·temporary right of way. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto ~nd made a part.of these minut~s. DISTRICT 7 Authorizing initiation of proceedings re Proposed Annexation No. 48 Moved, seconded, and d~ly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution _No. 76~49-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 6.647 acres of territory to the District in tl1e vicinity of Overhill and Miravista Drive (Proposed Annexation No.· 48.-. Tract No. 5369 to County Sanitation District No. 7) .. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Receive and file request from Donald Cray for annexation of territory to the District; and authorizing initiation of proceedings re Proposed A.nnexation No. 53 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the request from Donald Cray for annexation of approximately one acre of territory to the District in the vicinity of Santiago Canyon Road and Amapola Avem~ie, be received and orde:red filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 76-50-7, authoriiing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory (Proposed Annexation No. 53 -Cray Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 It was moved and seconded that Resolution Amending annexation policy No. 76-39-7, amending Resolution No. 75-44-7 establishing annexation policy re computation of annexation acreage fee, be adopted. Director Smi'th then requested that Councilman Perez of the City of Orange be heard regarding. the proposed resolution and the request of Orange Park Association for annexation to the District. Councilman Perez submitted the following statements :rnd requested tlwt they be recorded in the minutes of the meeting, fol lowing \vhich both he and Director Smith stated that the Orange Park Acres s~nitary sewer system should be provided by the City of Orange and reiterated the City's objection to the area's annexation to the District, as proposed: Annexation to Sanitation District #7 requires election (simple majority) and payment of annex3t_ion fees $8"28.00 per acre . . Genera] Obligation Bond Issue passage for payment of Annexation FC'cs only i~ not feasi.hJe. -12- 3/10/76 General Obligation Bond Issue as proposed in the amount o.f $1,140,000 requires a 2/3 majority. Proposed Bond Issue does not provide any local sewers. The statement by the proponents ·of this Annexation and Bond Issue relative to "the District's policy of providing trunk sewers within one-quarter mile of all properties 11 is not' a guaranteed right of all properties within the District. Annexation to Sani'tation· District #7 and passage of .the proposed .Bond Issue would impose a tax rate of $2.6954 per $100/A.V. but would not provide any local sewer system.or physical connections to the trunk sewer system. ·Annexation with complete sewer system would cost approximately $2,292,000 and would result in a tax rate of approximately $4.40!/ 100 A.V. At the present time Orange County Sanitation District #7 has no vested rights in those·portions of Reaches 17 and 18 constructed by the City of Orange. The proposed Improvement District is entirely within the official sphere of influence of the City of Orange as adopted by the Orange County L.A.F.C.O. The proposed. annexation fee of $828. 00 per acre will-be inequitable to those that have paid the current annexation fee of $1,029.00 per acre, unless appropriate refunds are made. Status of Tus~in-Orange Trunk Sewer Trunk sewers are presently completed to Fairhaven and the Flood Control Channel at Esplanade. (Reach 12) Design of Reaches 13 thru 16 of the trunk sewer from Fairhaven and Esplanade to Santiago Canyon Road and Linda Vista is now complete. The District Engineer will present the plans to the Board for approval 2/11/76 and ask for authorization to advertise for bids. This would accomplish the completion of the trunk system to meet the downstream end of the trunk sewer the City built in conjunction with Klug Development by some time this fall. The City of Orange and the developers, Klug Development and Broadmoor Homes, Inc. have constructed two sections of the "Master Planned" trunk sewer. The first section extends from Santiago Canyon Road and Linda Vista to the intersection of Orange Park Blvd. and Frank St. The second section extends from a point approximately 400' south of Meads Ave. and Handy Creek, along Handy Creek to a point approximately 725' south of Amapolla. From the upstream end of the first section at Orange Park Blvd. and Frank St. to the down stream end of the second section, a local 12" sewer has been constructed to connect the two sections of master planned trunk sewer main. During the design period of the first section we con- sidered building it along Handy Creek from Santiago Canyon Road, -13- 3/10/76 south-eastward, however, the proposed alignment traversed an extensiv~ multiplicity of ownerhsips which would have required a considerable period of time just to acquire the necessary right of way. We, therefore, constructed it within existing road rights of way except at the southwest corner of Santiago Canyon Road and Orangc'Park Blvd. and ended it at Orange Park Blvd. and Frank St. TI1C local 12" sewer main which we constructed from this point to the beginning of the second reach was also built primarily within existing road rights of way. The capacity of this 12" main is equal to approximately 40go of the trunk sewer. This will allow a considerable portion of the contributary area upstream of this section to be served before it becomes necessary to construct the parallel section of the trunk sewer. All of these s.ewer mains belong to the City of Orange. They were built by the City with sewer construction funds generated by the City, jointly by agreement with the Klug Development and Broadmoore Homes, Inc. The County of Orange has no financial investment or other rights in these facilities. We did construct certain portions of the mains to the design criteria of the adopted Master Plan of Sanitation District No. 7. This is intended at some future date to allow the city to "sell" these sections to District 7 at the City's option. The District has no vested rights in these sewers. At the request of the Board, the staff then reviewed the uniform annexation policy of the several Districts which provides for computation of fees based upon the net worth of the District divided by the acreage of the respective District. District No. 7, however, is in a unique position inasmuch as it is the only District with non-master plan local sewers constructed under assessment district proceedings and recorded as assets in its books of account. These facilities are actually maintained by sewer maintenance districts and must be repaired and/or replaced by said maintenance districts. The staff has therefore recommended that the local sewers be deleted from net equity in determining the annex:!: ion acreage fee of District No. 7. The staff further reported that no annexations have been conclu1.l., :\t the current acreage fee which includes the value of local sewers j n : '.1·. compu- tation. However, one annexation is in process for which a deposit has been made, which said deposit is presently being held in trust pending a determination by the Board relative to its annexation policy. Following further discussion, the question was called for and Resolution No. 76-39-7, runending Resolution No. 75-44-7, establishing annexation acreage fee, was duly adopted by roll call vote. Certified copy of this resol~tion is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Receive 3n<l file legal opinion of the Ccncral Counsel re Orange Park Acres annex.at.ion to the histr.ict llll'nt district solely to p~1y the o i·dc red fi 1 ed. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the legal opinion of the District's Gcncr~1 l Counsc1 re· lat i ve to the request of the proponents of ~mncxation of the Or~rnge P:1 rk Acres :nca to cs ta h l ish an imp rovc- ll is t ri ct anncx:1 t ion f ccs, be l'l'Cc i \'Cd :rnJ -14- t •• DISTRICT 7 ·Receive and file letter from Peggy L. McElligott re Proposal for Concurrent Annexation and.Bond Authori- zation -Orange Park Acres received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 7 Authorizing initiation of proceedings re Orange Park Acres annexation to the District 3/lQ/76 . t Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the letter from Peggy L. ~cElligott, Attorney for Orange Park Association, datcp January 28, 1976, regarding Proposal for Concurrent Annexation and Bond A:uthorization ,-Orange Park Acres, be ·~ Following a brief discussion regarding the· General Counsel's memorandum relative to the request of Orange Park Association for annexation of territory to the Disrrict, it was moved and seconded that the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-53-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex the Orange Park Acres area to District No. 7. The Board then entered into a lengthy discussion concerning the request of Orange Park Association for concurrent annexation and bond authoriza- tion. The maker of the motion stated that the proposed annexation should be considered by the District Board solely on the merits of providing sewerage service to the area and that any consideration of the propriety of also annexing the territory· to the City of Orange should be the deter- mination of the Local Agency Formation Commission. Furthermore, the proposal of Orange Park Association for concurrent annexation and bond authorization would require a two-thirds m~jority vote of the affected residents. The Director representing the City of Orange requested that the City's position previously set f~rth under the preceding agenda item be considered in connection with the prop~sed annexation of the Orange Park Acres area. The Board then entered into a further discussion regarding the most cost- effective method of providing sewerage service for the territory in question, following which the Chair recognized Peggy McElligott, attorney for the proponents of the annexation, who spoke in favor of the proposal and urged approval by the Board. After further discussion, the question was called for and Resolution No. 76-53-7, authorizing initiation of annexation proceedings for the Orange Park Acres area, was duly adopted by roll call vote. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part qf these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Approving uniform Directors' mileage expense reimbursement policy Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-52-7, amending Resolution No. 73-53-7 to provide for uniform Directors' mileage expense reimbursement for each District of the Joint Administrative Orgnnization. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -15- 3/10/76 DISTRICT 7-Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Consideration of policy re Directors' Compensation That the staff prepare a resolution for the Boards' consideration at the regular April meeting relative to a change in Directors' compensation policy identical to that previously adopted by Districts 1, 2, 3 and 11. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, an~ duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman the declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:18 p.rn., March 10, 1976. -1 {)- WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN·FAVOR OF ·289·05 . 28906 ~907. ~8908 ·28909 28910 28911 28912 . 28913 . . 28914 ... 28915 ~8916 . 28917 28918 28919 28920 28921 28922 28923 28924 28925 28926 28927 28928 28929 28930 28931 28932. 28933 28934 28935 28936 . 28937 ---28938 .28939 l 289~0 28941 28942 l 1{2894 3 28944 28945 28946 28947 28948 I 2894"9 . 28950 28951 , . 28952 28953 28954 28955 8956 ~8957 28958 .A & S Building Maintenance Co., J~riitorial Service ALZ Industrial Pump Division, Pump Repair Acme Canvas Products, Test Materi~ls Air California, Air Fare, Various Meetings Airdraulic, Pump Parts . Air Seals Corporation, Engine Parts All Bearing Service, Inc.; Bearings, Hose & Co_uplings · · Allied ·supply Company, Valves &.Pipe S~pplies . Almquist Tool & Equipment, Hardware · · .. · American Compressor Company, Co~pressor Parts American Controls, Valves· American Cyanamid Company; Chemicals .· . City.of Anaheim, Power·. · ~. . Anaheim Sewer Construction, Lateral Repair · The Anchor Packing Co., Pump Packing -~. B. Anderson Co., Tools Anixter Purzan, Hardware N. T. Bailey, JPL Lockers ~ Bank of America, Bond &' Coupon Collection Banning Battery Company~ Batteries · Beckman Instruments, Controls John G. Bell Co., Barscreen Parts Better Rents, Equipment Rental . Black & Decker Mfg. Co., Equipment Parts Blower Paper Company, Tape Boyle Engineering Corp., Plant 2 Facilities·Plan Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment exams CS Company, Valves & Pump Parts .· CWPCA, Safety Seminar Registration Cadillac Plastic & Chemical Co., Plexiglas Cal-State Seal Company, Gasket Material: . Cal's Cameras, ·Photo Processing & Supplies ··Calif. Association of Sanitary Agencies, Workshop Registration California Collator Sales, Specification Supplies Carmenita Ford Truck Sales, Inc., Truck Parts R. L. Carson, Employee Mileage R. B. Clapp Co., Inc., Controls Clark Dye Hardware, Tools Coast Nut & Bolt ·Co., Steel & Hardware College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials Consolidated Electrical Distbrs., Electric Supplies Continental Chemical Co., Chlorine Control Specialists, Inc., Regulator Parts C. W. Corum, Lateral Repair Leelon L. Cory, Employee Mileage Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa County Water District, Water County Wholesale Electric, Electric Supplies Crane Veyor Corporation, Digester Repair Charles P. Crowley Co., Freight Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplies Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies Daniels Tire Service, Truck Tires C. R. Davis Supply Co., Pipe Supplies & Hose "I-1" . t • AMOUNT 366.00 806.00 . . 12. 50 160.70 l.!4.75 36.95 526.97 .:i,324.49 10. 97 . .. 213 .80 415.13 9,~41.-64 .· ·228. 92 . 450.00 380.31 109.48 215. 25· 127.20 4LJ.6. 30 408.73 204.43 379.88 27. 4o. 15.00 ·169. 43 8,.500.00 13.00 874.54 97. 50. "73. 61 64.08 .288..42 200.00 170.40 36.38 11.40 778.76 33.92 110.31 77.17 702.72 3,097.10 341. 94 400.00 5.25 580.37 6.oo 149.20 2,500.00 10.35 40.00 178.76 169.39 1,030.04 WARRANT NO. · IN FAVOR OF . 28959 28960 . 28961 28962 28.963 . 28964 28965 28966 2t$967 28968 28969 .28970 28971 28972 28.973 28974. 28975 28976 28977 28978 ·. 28979 28980 28981 28982 28983 28984 28985 28986 28987 28988 . 28989 28990 28991 28992 . 28993 ' 28994 28995 ,. "'28996 .· .. 28997 28998 . 28999 29000 29001 29002 29003 29004 29005 29006 29007 29008 29009 29010 29011 29012 29013 29014 . ' Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling ~ $r Diamond-Newport Ice Co., Sampling Supplies Eastman, Inc., Office .Supplies & Printing Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Services . Fibre Glass Evercoat Co., Inc., Freight Fischer & Porter Company, Instrument Supplies & Charts· Fluid Tech; Regulator City of Fountain Valley, Water . Compressor Products Division, Compressor Repair City of Fullertnn, Water . , General Electric Supply, Electric Supplies General Telephone Company Cindy Geter, Employee Mil~age Goldenwest Fertilizer Co., Grit. Removal Goodyear Tire Center, Truck Tires · M. E. Gray Co., Valves & Hardware Graybar Electric Company, Electric Supplies Hanson's Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies Charles G. Hardy, Inc., Hardware Harrington Industrial Plastics,-Pipe Supplies Michael. Heinz, Employee Mileage Hennig, Inc., Truck Repair Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease Hilti Fastening Systems, Hardware Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires Honeywell, Inc., Strip Charts Hopper Service Parts Co., Truck Parts Howard Supply Company, Hardware, Tools & Pipe Supplies City of Huntington Beach, Water IDS Corporation, Off ice Supplies Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Freight. International Harvester Co., Truck Parts Irvine Ranch Watei·District, Water J & M Service, Equipment. Parts Jensen Instrument Company, Controls Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supplies King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, V-Belts & Pump Parts Kirst Pump & Ma.chine Works, Pump Parts Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware Lo Ao Dodge Construction News, Legal Notice P2-23 LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tools & Tool Repair L & N Uniforms Supply Co., Uniform Service The Lacal Company, Inc., Pump Packing Lakewood Pipe Service, Freight Larsen-Hogue Electric, Electric Supplies Lawson Products, Inc., Hardware Lewco Electric Company, Truck Repair McCoy Ford Tractor, Equipment & Tractor Parts McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Tools, Gauges & Hardware Master Blueprint & Supply, Blueprints & Printing Morgan Equipment Company, Equipment Parts Motorola, Inc., Communication Equipment Nalco Chemical Company_, Chemj_cals National Chemsearch, Solvent & Cleaner National Lumber Supply, Building Materials "l-2" AMOUNT . 295. 00 15.90 703.95 3,000.c .. 12.57 478.87 291.67 40.00 70.00 6.08 2, 985.41-' 1,876.. 91 . 4 3~ 26 l,296.-00 ··. . 182.32 J.tl~8. 67 38.03 57. 20. 109.56 1ns. 55 4.20. 175.51 743.51 169.60 357.94· . 58 .12 ( 30. 4 3 3,370.98 144.35 224.64 . 8. 50 8.14 1.75 20·.99 68.74 66.11 173.24 584.32 251.38 48.34 330.00 579.53 1,973.29 538.91 17.93 ·255.16 47. 24 ' 51. 82. 234.92 644. 21 . 46.06. 67.76 198.72 1,280.~ 1,182.~ 68.92 WARRANT NO.· IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 29015 2901'6 .· 29017 ~9018 . J020. ~9021 29022 29023 2902li 29025 29026 . ·. 29027 ... 29028 . 29029 . 29030 29031 29032 29033 29034 29035 29036 29037 29038 29039 29040 29041 29042 29043 29044 29045 . 29046 29047 29048 ·29049 . 29050 .29051 29052 29053 ··29054 29055 29056 ·29057 29058 29059 29060 29061 29062 "0 29063 29064 . 29065 ·. 29066 29067 29068 29069 -J070 ~9071 ' . City of Newport Beach, Water Nolex Corporation, Reproduction Supplies ·office Equipment Specialists, Equipment·Repair Orange County Water District, RepJ_enishmer.Lt Tax Orange Valve & Fitting Co., Hardware . Overhead Door Company,· Warehouse Doors Pacific Telephone Company M. c. Patten Corporation, .Gauges Petroleum Dynamics, Pump Parts Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial ~upplie·s Tom Ponton, Inc., Pump Parts _ . Printec Corporation, Reproduction Supplies· Quality Building Supply, ~ilding Materials •. $ 485.09 1,062.01 58.27 431.20 . . 10. 55 2,045.80 452.12 252.08 li.90 691.99 27 .85' . . 288.43 533~70 '. 61~ .· 00 Rainbow Disposal Company, 'l'rash Disposal '1.'he Regj_ster, NPDES Notice, Bid Notice 11-lR-l ·& The Republic Supply Co~, Pipe Supplies · .Richey Electronics, Inc., Electric Supplies Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts & Pump Subscription. 171.56 249.37 462.83 4' 840. 20_ Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Santa Ana Electric Moto;rs, Electric Motor & Motor Repair Sargent. Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies Scientific Products, Lab Supplies Seal Methods, Inc., Gas~ets See Optics, Safety Glasses s. F. Serrantino, Employee Mileage· Shepherd Machinery Co., Equipment Parts Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies John Sigler, Employee Mileage Signal-Flash Company, Barricade Rental Southern California Edison Company South Orange Supply, Pipe Supplies Southern California Gas Company Southern California Water Company Sparkletts Drinking Water Corporation, Bottled Water Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Oil Company of Calif., Gasoline & Diesel Fuel Sterling Art & Engineering Supply, Drafting Supplies Surveyor 1 s Service Company, Tools · T-Girl Temporary Employment, Temporary Warehouse Help Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage & Water Conf. Expense Co O. Thompson Petroleum Co., Kerosene Trexler Compressor, Inc., Compressor Parts Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts Tustin Water Works, Water Union Oil Company of Calif., Gasoline United Parcel Service, Freight-out United Reprographics, Inc., Industrial Waste Ord. Printing United States Elevator Corp., Maintenance Agreement University of Calif., Irvine Regents, JPL Computer Model Van Waters & Rogers, Chemicals VWR Scientific, Test Supplies Varec, Inc., Freight Wallace & Tiernan, Chlorinator Parts Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage John R. Waples, R.S., Odor Consultant Waste King Universal, Equipment Repair "l-3" 57.18 348.12 80.75 24.59 103.62 29.68 22. 50· . 74. 02 494.90 12.75 98.50 47,562.49. 125.45 1,833.12 3.24 · 165·. 57 234.11 4,868.42 51.64 32.35 166$88 102.00 198.78 891.41 966.55 167.09 11.36 32.94 1,618.21 33.00 247 .J.i6 2,599.72 103.10 10.25 437.J~o 43.50 212.90 27.50 WARRANT NO •. . ' IN FAVOR OF . 29072 ·29073 ·29074 29075. 29b76 ·29077 29078 Western Wholesale Company, Equipment Parts .Wi'lson Ford Sales, Trucl~ Parts Th6mas L. Woodruff, General Couns~l Donald J~ Wright, Employee Mileage Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Services Everett H .. York Company, Filters Zodiac PB:per Company, Pri~ting S_upplies TOTAL JOINT OPERATING CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 32.59 189.53 5,101.5('\ .. 27.~ 1, 1~57. 95 202.57 52.53 -------------' .. 28877 28878 28879 AnalY,tical Measurements, PH Recorder $· 969.00 . 4, 134. oo· . 28880 28881 28882 28883 28884 28885 28886 28887 28888 28889 28890 28891 28892 28893 2889'-i 28895 28896 28897 28898 28899 28900 28901 28902 28903 28904 Calgon Corp., Activated Carbon for ACTS John Carollo Engineers, Engr. S~rv., ACTS~ Fae. Plan & J-6-1 ' County Sanitation Dist. '2 of L. A., Solfds Management Daily Pilot, Bid Notice A-080 Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16 Envirotech-Sparling, Carbon Analysis Elwood H. Fairchild, JPL Consultant J. B. Gilbert & Associates, Fae. Plan & P2-23 EIR J. Putnam Henck, Contractor, JPL-ACTS Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Management Pl-16 Howard Supply Company, Pipe · Instrument Specialj_st Com:pany, JPL Programmer Motorola, Inc., Mobile Radio & Communication Equipment Olympic Signs, JPL Signs ·. Pepsi Co. Bldg. Systems, Inc.~ JPL Equipment Rental c. Eo Raymond/Bartlett-Snow, JPL Kiln The Register, Bid Notice PW-049 Rockwell International, Calculator Thomas J. Rush, La.the Sales Engineers Limited, Polymer Tank Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Incubator Smith Emery Company, Testing Pl-16 Jack R. Strobel, :MAI, Plant 2 Land Appraisal Taylor Instruments, JPL Flowmeters Twining Laboratories, Concrete Test Up-Right Scaffolds, Scaffolding Wyle Laboratories, Consultant Pl-16 TOTAL COHF TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF "I-4" 25,473.48 65, ooo. oo· 9.11 795' 809. }~ 3 9,808.03 276.00 6,708.27 238,862.87 12,484.51 .1,419. 34 720.80 2,483. 63 530.00 .861 .. 86 195,000.00 97.00 213.27 9,795.10 4,629.78 3,191-t.84 5·2. 00 650.00 29,906.40 15.00 3'-l5. 56 532.00 $ 1, 409' 981. 28 .. $ 1,556,530.91: tlA'llAANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 28854 Precision· /mod~zing, Refund IW Permit Overpayment , . ' ACCillfilLATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS .. IN FAVOR OF , .. 28855 28856 28857" 28858 28859 28860 A.T. & S.F. Railroad Company, Santa Ana River Interceptor Payments . 28861 28862 28863 28864 John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contractor 2-14-3 - Count;y of Orange, Compaction Testing 2-15 · ·. J. Putnam .ijenck, A Corporation, Contractor 2-15 Kasler Corp. & L.H. Woods, JV., Contractor 2-14-4 Kraemer IV, Easement 2-17-1 .. Long Beach Iron Works, Inc., Contractor 2-14-4 Lowry and Associates, Engineering Services 2-15, 2-17-2 Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 2-14-3, 2-14-4, 2-14-5 S.S. Zarubica, Contractor 2-14-5 · DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 28865 Los Alamitos General Hospital, Refund IW Permit Overpayment ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF ' . 28866 Boyle Engineering Corp., Engineering Services 3-20, 3-20-1, 3-21-2 28867 County of Orange, Compaction Testing, 3-20-1, 3-20-2, 3-21-1 28868 Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing, 3-20-1, 3-20-2 28869. Southern California Testing Laboratory, Soils Testing 3-21-1 '.28870 Sully-Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 3-20-1 .28871 A.G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N.M. Saliba Co., Contractor 3-20-2 "II-1" . ~ $ ... $ AMOUNT 73.32 300.00 30,297.60 80.89 27,740.48 795,447.00 23,750.00 162.18 3,048.00 . 3, 796. 00 '33,693.61 $ 918,315.76 $ 918,389.08 $ 17.50 $ 12,997.00 339.54 962.00 72.00 287,953.60 353,477.00 $ 655' 801.14 $ 655,818.64 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. · IN FAVOR OF 28872 City of·Newport·Beach, Connection Fee Administration 11 11-2" $ \,,,..l' AMOUNT 524.75 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. ." IN FAVOR OF 28873 28874 .. . . . Local Agency Formation Commission, Annexation ff 53 Pro~essing Fee Shelton & Associates, Right-of-Way.Appraisal · . FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 28875 Irvine Industrial Complex, Master Plan Reinbursement Agreement DISTRICT NO. 11 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 28876 Clifford L. Thompson Construction Co .. , Contractor 11-4R "III" $. $ $ AMOUNT 25.00 499.50 524 ."so 119,806.27 $ 120,330.77 $ 10,627.25~