HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-03-03COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX Bl 27. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
February 23, 1976
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING
DISTRICT NO. 5
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 3, 1976, 5:00 P.M.
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
I am calling a special meeting of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, at the above
hour and date.
The purpose of this meeting is to discuss with Irvine Ranch Water
District personnel possible conditions for annexation of territory
along the coastline to the District.
~~
Don Mc!nnis
Chairman
TELE PH ON ES:
AR EA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
TO: JWS
FROM: Jean
February 20, 1976
RE: SP ECIAL MEETING OF DISTRICT NO . 5
It has been established with Chair man Mcinnis and
Bill Hurst 's office that there will be a special meeting of
Di str ict No . 5 f or Wednesday , March 3rd, 5:00 p .m., in our
offices for the purpose of meeting with Irvine Ranch Water
District personnel regarding annexation along the coastline .
I will ca ll the District No. 5 active Director s and Tom Wood r uff
to apprise them of t he meeting .
II
BOARDS OF IJIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
DISTRICT No. 5
SPECIAL MEETING
MARCH 3, 1976 -5:00 P.M.
(1) Roll Call
(2) Appointment of Chairman pro tern, if necessary
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:·
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
(3) Consideration of request from Irvine Ranch Water District for
terms and conditions for annexation of territory to the District
between Newport Beach and Laguna Beach
(a) Discussion
(b) Consideration of establishing con·di tions for annexation
(4) Consideration of motion to adjourn / 1'1. i ~·)
February 24, 1976
S T A F F R E P 0 R T
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE •
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71.C) 540-2910
(714) 962-2.Cl 1
RE: Request by Irvine Ranch Water District for Annexation to
District No. 5
In 1969, an Interim Master Plan Report was prepared for the
District by Donald Simpson and Associates. This report outlined
the District's facilities which would be needed to serve what
was then contemplated to be the ultimate boundaries of the
District.
In December, 1971, a supplemental report was filed with
the Directors to update the 1969 Interim Master Plan to reflect
revisions in the development plans for the Coastal slope area
between the Cities of Newport and Laguna Beach. This Supplemental
· Report was required because of land-use plans developed by the
Irvine Company for the development of this Coastal slope area.
The ultimate District boundaries which are shown on a map en-
closed with this report are the same tentative.boundaries that
were then decided by the two cities to be used in the Irvine
Company's studies of 1971. In these two reports, the facilities
then planned contemplated serving that area lying outside
District No. 5, which is comprised of approximately 2500 acres.
The residential growth element of the City of Newport Beach
General Plan was adopted by the City Council in 1973. Since that
time, several amendments have been made to this element of the
General Plan. It appears that the residential growth element
provided in the City's General Plan indicates approximately a
14% increase in population over that projected in 1969. The
City's General Plan population projections were made on the basis
of full utilization of the zoning, whereas in 1969, the population
projections were based on what was felt to be a practicable utili-
zation of the zoning. The 1969 report, as amended in 1971, con-
templated facilities to'accommodate approximately 27 million
gallons per day of peak wet-weather flow. The current residential
growth element as adopted by the City Council would require ·
facilities to accommodate 29.8 million gallons per day of peak
wet-weather flow. This does not provide for any of the down-coast
area which was estimated to contain more than 10,000 residential
units, 1250 hotel rooms, and a million square feet of commercial
development.
Capacities can be made available in the District pumping
facilities that now exist within the District. Sewer capacities
to serve this down-coast area must be provided by the installation
of new facilities from the Promontory Bay area down coast to
the subject area.
In a recent report prepared by Simpson and Steppat for
the Districts' Joint Board Facilities Plan, they reported that
if this down-coast area is annexed, it would require a new
trunk sewer from the Back Bay Pump Station along Bayside Drive
to Marguerite Avenue, thence along Pacific Coast Highway. It
is also stated in the report that if this area is not annexed
to the District, the existing Coast Highway Trunk along Jamboree
Road, Back Bay Drive along the Corona del Mar pump station,
may have sufficient capacities to serve the remaining undeveloped
areas presently within the District. ·
The staff will have these reports available at the meeting
to further discuss in detail.
Ray E. Lewis
Chief Engineer
._,·
l '.1t\.l.\.I·~ l•t.·\.'\.'t'll \\._\'fi\l,t lrtI~,,PDl[Cl' l ~ . 1 • 1 ~) ii ,, P.O. Bo>: D-1 • 4:!01 Campus Dr1ve •Irvine:. C;ilif. 92664 • (71.!) c33·1~2;:
January 6, 1976
Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 5
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject:
Gentlemen:
Request Terms· and Conditions for
Annexation to OCSD #5
659LCC1/76
We have retained Willdan Associates, an engineering consultant, to prepare
a study of alternative methods of waste water disposal for The Irvine Company's
coastal area between Newport Beach and Laguna Beach. A portion of this study
area has been included in the Orange County Sanitation District No. 5 reports
of November 1969 and December 1971 prepared by the District Engineer. The
area considered at this time is approximately that area designated as Number 1
in the District's December 1971 Master Plan Revision.
IRWD requests the conditions for annexation of the study area to OCSD #5
including political, financial and engineering, to be identified. We will be
pleased to provide additional information regarding proposed population an-
ticipated sewage flows, boundaries of service area, etc. as requested.
Thank you for your consideration o.f this request.
Very truly yours,
FILED ·
In the Office of the Secre:tary
Coun~ S'1nitaticn District
No ,
FE811,\q7lt>
8~----------~-----
r .. _ ...... _, ........................... ·: .......... : ~· ·~:: ... · ................ 1.. .. · ... ! ... :_,,rn ... ,,21 ;-4 .•
',
. . , . '
... ,
/
·" . \,_
.·
·..>·'·
. ........ __,,,:··.
•I'
'·
..
..
·-.
•'•I
' \
' t '11 '
RES 6 42 UPllT S
COMM . 1,624 ,67 0 S.F.
..
•.RES. 74 8 UNITS
co ·~M 5~.ooo s. r.
.... : ,.· ....
-"
·~' .... .... .... t
.' •'
----""'~ . ;,~,
RES. "7 61 l/NI T9 .
I ·~·. ·\~·· . (;
·--~
T .. ~~ .. ..
.. :,..-
.. I . :_: ..
'\
... : .... ,.~ _,, .. : ' . ...
. ·.
...... . ' •
... So: ..:.. •
"
'-.
. '·
' c \' t
"
(f' .. .
··· .. ··-· ~ .... .
u' llES. io,r;z UNI TS .
-'": , · ... .. .. ·, ..........
'\:C OM~' 1,050 ,000 S.F.-
0 HO Tt'.~ 12$0 · !IMS. . .~:
'<.
"-· . . . ": --. ..... ...
. •' .•·
,/
-···===
7'
" A
---1~--
16 0. "6
.. ·~ . . . '.,
l E G r. N 0
.
' ' '
::·.-....... · . .,..··~ ,,, .
!:XI STINO OI STlllCT llOUNDAllY
PR OPO SED OI STRICT llOVNDAllT
AREA BOU N OA RT
AR EA CES I G!'I A TJO I<
PROP OS E D P UMI> ST ATION
PRO P OS E D FO RC E MAIN a SIZ I
P ROPOSED GRAV!TY MAIN, SI ZE a P.Yr .W.f., M.O.D .
CH ANOE I N P I PE s1::r
FA C I L IT Y DESI GN AT IO N
CO UNTY SAN ITATION DIST RIC T NO 5
M AS T ER_f_l,,~f!_.f_ACl 1=_LTJ!". ~·-S_f).J ~UR E OE VELCP '-'E
February 24, 1976
S T A F F R·E P 0 RT
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE •
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71.C) 540-2910
(71.C) 962-2.C 11
RE: Request by Irvine Ranch Water District for Annexation to
District No. 5
In 1969, an Interim Master Plan Report was prepared for the
District by Donald Simpson and Associates. This report outlined
the District's facilities which would be needed to serve what
was then contemplated to be the ultimate boundcries of the
District.
In December, 1971, a supplemental report was filed with
the Directors to update the 1969 Interim Master Plan to reflect
revisions in the development plans for the Coastal slope area
between the Cities of Newport and Laguna Beach. This Supplemental
Report was required because of land-use plans developed by the
Irvine Company for the development of this Coastal slope area.
The ultimate District boundaries which are shown on a map en-
closed with this report are the same tentative boundaries that
were then decided by the two cities to be used in the Irvine
Company's studies of 1971. In these two reports, the facilities
then planned contemplated serving that area lying outside
District No. 5, which is comprised of approximately 2500 acres.
The residential growth element of the City of Newport Beach
General Plan was adopted by the City Council in 1973. Since that
time, several amendments have been made to this element of the
General Plan. It appears that the residential growth element
provided in the City's General Plan indicates approximately a
14% increase in population over that projected in 1969. The
City's General Plan population projections were made on the basis
of full utilization of the zoning, whereas in 1969, the population
projections were based on what was felt to be a practicable utili-
zation of the zoning. The 1969 report, as amended in 1971, con-
templated facilities to accommodate approximately 27 million
gallons per day of peak wet-weather flow. The current residential
growth element as adopted by the City Council would require ·
facilities to accommodate 29.8 million gallons per day of peak
wet-weather flow. This does not provide for any of the down-coast
area which was estimated to contain more than 10,000 residential
units, 1250 hotel rooms, and a million square feet of commercial
development.
·"-"' Capacities can be made available in the District pumping
facilities that now exist within the District. Sewer capacities
to serve this down-coast area must be provided by the installation
of new facilities from the Promontory Bay area down coast to
the subject area.
In a recent report prepared by Simpson and Steppat for
the Districts' Joint Board Facilities Plan, they reported that
if this down-coast area is annexed, it would require a new
trunk sewer from the Back Bay Pump Station along Bayside Drive
to Marguerite Avenue, thence along Pacific Coast Highway. It
is also stated in the report that if this area is not annexed
to the District, the existing Coast Highway Trunk along Jamboree
Road, Back Bay Drive along the Corona del Mar pump station,
may have sufficient capacities to serve the remaining undeveloped
areas presently within the District.
The staff will have these reports available at the meeting
to further discuss in detail.
Ray E. Lewis
Chief Engineer
I I ,t\. I.\ l·J, 1•t.\\.'t 1I l \\ .. '1'f i\l,t l,l ,,~,rl, Pl [{ ,1, • ' ~ f l) I , P.O. Bo-.: D·I • 4:_.01 C;1mpus Drive• Irvine.., Calif. 9266-1 • (71-!) 833-1:::??
January 6, 1976
Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 5
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
·subject:
Gentlemen:
Request Terms· and Conditions for
Annexation to OCSD #5
659LCC1/76
. We have retained Willdan Associates, an engineering consultant, to prepare
a study of alternative methods of waste water disposal for The Irvine Company's
coastal area between Newport Beach and Laguna Beach. A portion of this study
area has been included in the Orange County Sanitation District No. 5 reports
of November 1969 and December 1971 prepared by the District Engineer. The
area considered at this time is approximately that area designated as Number 1
in the District's December 1971 Master Plan Revision.
IRWD requests the conditions for annexation of the study area to OCSD #5
including political, .financial and engineering, to be identified. We will be
pleased to provide additional information regarding proposed population an-
ticipated sewage flows, boundaries of service area, etc. as requested.
Thank you for your consideration o_f this request.
Very truly yours,
FILED ·
In the Office of the Secrc:tary
Coun~ Sanitation District
No >
FE8
'. ... ,
< .. ",,: .· :\._ .,
' '
·.-.· :. ·~--\~ ·.•. .........
... -~ -
,,
• J' ~;. .-
•. , .. / . .. :.: ...... ",
. _: .. .-' -.. (;
.. .-' ". :~)
.... :>.'
. . , _ _,,:" . ' ~
-~
·,.··
•, ... •:"--
,/
. / -.
'~ '
••• l
!' •• .
I
'
.• ..
..
j .. ,,,'J
.:. .. "'------~ ""'---..~#·'",
.:41
... ~ ... I ' o I k t
RES 6~2 UNITS
COlllM , 1.524,670 S.r.
•.flE S . 748UNITS
COM M ~~.000 S. F.
..... : .. ~-.
'·
_ ..
~---"-i'
l,-1; ~ES . '761 UNITS.
.•
I
";._~,·. ~
.. ,,. ...
.·
' ...•.
·-=· . ·""'-', . ~
,,.>
··-. ,.~
T
·..:.;. ·.
, •..
-~
. ..
-I
. .
->:<:· ... ;i' .. .
I..!/.• .. .
-. ........
·.
. ' .
·.•\.,
-·
~·· • RES. 10.rn UNITS .
'\: COll!t.l ' 1,050,000 S.,,,
-HO.TE~ 1_2$0 · llMS .
... ..... , · .. . ... : ....
_.;._+·~ . . . '--....... •:
·"
.~ f
.. ....
..
. ~,
'..
. '
L f: G E: N 0
EX !S TINO OISTRICT eOUNOART
----·---.. l'R OPOSEO OI STRICT eOVPIOAA'
AREA e OUNOARY
7' ..,. A
--1~--1a· -4 a
ARE A tESIONATIOM
PROP OSE D P U MI' STATIOll
P ROPOHO F ORCE W.A IM a Sil
PROPOS ED CRl.VITY IUIN, $121
a P. W.W. f .• M.a. 0 .
CHA NG E IN PIPE 5141;
FAC IL ITY OES IGHATIO M
CO UN TY SAN ITAT ION DIS TR I CT NO 5
MASTE R_f_l,~!'1_fAC ILITJ!'_S __ a_£1.!1URE OEVELCF'"'E
MEETING DATE March 3, 1976 TIME
DISTRICT 1
RI MA •••.••••
(DIEDRICH) ...••. BATTIN ••.•• ------
(f''~Ns) .......... GARTHE •.•.• == == == (~KP) .••••••••• SAL TAR ELLI. _____ _
DISTRICT 2
LYONS · ·••·• .. ·CALLAHAN ••• _____ _
EWING .•.••..•.• CHAPUT .....•
DIEDRICH) ...... CLARK ....... ------
GARTHEl ...•••.• EVANS ......• ------
THOt-1) ........... KAYWOOD ..•. == == ==
FOX) ••••.•.••••• MAC KA IN .•• _____ _
JACKMAN) ••••••• PEREZ ...•..• _____ _
~ )
PERRY ••...•• _____ _
SVALSTAD ...... SCOTT ..... ..
DUNN~). ......... WINN ........ == == ==
WARD) •.•••.••••• WOOD ....••••
GRAHAM} ••.•••• : YOUNG .•...•• == == ==
DISTRICT 3
(HOMR I GHAUSEN). COX ....•.••.
(COLLINS) ••..••• BYRNE .....•. ======
CULVER. •.•.•
(GRIFFIN) •...•.. DAVIS .••..•. ------
(GARTHEl •...••.• EVANS .....•• ------
(MAC KAIN) ...... FOX ......... ------
~NEVIlJ .......... GRAHAM ..... ======
THOM) ........... KAYWOOD .... _____ _
SONJU) ... , ...... MAC LAIN ... _____ _
BLACKMAN1 •.•..•• MC KNEW .•.. _____ _
OLSON .•..••. _____ _
(DIEDRICH) •...•. SCHMIT ...•..
(GIBBS) .......... SHIPLEY. ..•. -. -. ----
(STANTON) .....•• SVALSTAD ..• -----. -
(wooD) •••..•..•.. WARD ••.•...• ------
(ARB1soL ....... WEISHAUPT .. ======
DISTRICT 5
(RYCKOFF))··· ..• MC INNIS .•. ___'{__.· __ _
(DIEDRICH ...... RILEY ....•.. -"-_._. ___ .
ROGERS. ..•.• _I ____ _
s:oo p.m. DISTRICTS ----------
JOINT BOARDS
DIEDRIC~ ..•... BATTIN ...... ·--_
ANTHONY ....•.•. BURTON .••..•• ___ _
COLLI~S .•••.... BYRNE ....... ·--__
LYONS~ .•..•..... CALLAHAN ..•. ·--__
EWING ....••.•.. CHAPUT ••.... ·--__
DIEDRICH) ....... CLARK .•••...•
HOMRIGHAUSEN) •• cox.·.~·-······== ==
CULVER .......
!GRIFFIN) ...•..•. DAVIS ..• · •..•. == ==
MC INN Is L ..•.. DOSTAL....... .
GIBBS) .......... DUKE ........ .
GARTHE) .....•.•. EVANS ..••••.• ----
MAC KAI NL ..... FOX ....•..••. ----
(EVANS).········ ·GARTHE· • • • • • • ----
(WIEDER) ••••••••• G JBBS • • • • · • • • == ==
GLOCKNER .•.•
!NEVIL) •••••••••• GRAHAM ••••.•• == ==
PEREi) •••••••••• JACKMAN •••..•
THO~) ••••.•••••• KAYWOOD ••••.• ___ _
FOXJ. ........... MAC KA IN •••.
SONJU) .......... MAC LA IN .... ----
(RYCOFF ) ...•..•.• MC INNIS. .. ··====
(BLACKMAN) .•.... MC KNEW •..•.. ___ _
OLSON •.•....•
(JACKMAN) ..•••... PEREZ ...•.••• == ==
PERRY .•.•.•.•
(DIEDRICH) •.•••• RILEY •.....•. ====
RIMA ••......• ___ _
ROGERS ...... .
SHARP) ....•• · •. · •• SALTARELLI .. ----
DIEDRICH) •..•.. SCHMIT .•..... ----
SVALSTAD) ..•.•. SCOTT ....•... ----
GIBBS) ........ .".SHIPLEY •..... ----
MC INNIS) .•...• STORE ........ ----
STANTON) ....•• ·.svALSTAD •... ----
WOOD) •.......••. WARD ....•..•. ----
ARB I SO) ...• 4 •••• WEISHAUPT ... -_ ---
.. DUNNE) •.•.• : •••. WINN ......... ----
WARD) ..••..•.••• WOOD •.•...... ----
GRAHAM) .•.••.••• YOUNG ...•.... == ==
OTHERS
DISTRICT 6 Jx~'dc! ~JJ~1
(MC INNIS)., .... STORE ....•.• -----<t'\ ~\.>-;(/J \Jvi1r"--
HARPER
SYLVESTER
LEWIS
CLARKE
TAYLOR
BROWN
··/
(DIEDRICH) ...••. BATTIN. ....• __ ~o,\y-v (ir?i.f1 · J
RIMA ..••••.• _ --d l...
v ...41.k---=-D l STRICT 7 't· ~ "J . 1 · f11~~1 EVANS •...•...• GARTHE .••.• __ __ __ 'J..h (
ANTHONY) ...•.•. BURTON .•••. ____ --b (; l WOODRUFF
EWING
HOH EN ER
HOWARD
D._..)RICH) ..•.•. CLARK ...••• _ _ _ (. 1 It. >:t-c~.;
(MC INNIS) .•.•.. DOSTAL ....• ______ w·•\~~.' . GLOCKNER .•. ______ ,\, .
~PEREZ~ JACKMAN ' ~ 1-..,;.r\· (\~ HUNT
. . . . . . . . . . . ... -----~~9.t ,~~·QC. ..J Ji E I TH . SHARP .•..•..... SALTA RELLI.__ __ __ _ '(}~ ~ ·b ENNEY
DISTRICT 11 L '"'/.1/LlM~·' I} LYNCH L!... f t/" MADDO X
(DI EDRI CH) ••••.. .S CHMIT. •.... ------/(). MART--1 NSON
DUKE .•..•..• ------PI ER SALL
(WI EDERL .....•• GIBBS ..••.•. -· -----STEVEN S
DISTRICT 8 TRAVERS
EDWARD S .•.• _____ _
~JOHN S ON) ....... HOLM ....••. _____ _
lDIEDRICH) •..... RILEY .•..••• ____ --
v
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING
March 3, 1976 -5:00 p.m.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
A special meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. S of Orange County, California, was held at the above hour and date.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. The roll was called
and the Secretary reported a quorum present.
DIRECTORS PRESENT:
DIRECTORS ABSENT:
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
Don Mcinnis (Chairman), Thomas Riley
and Howard Rogers
None
Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne
Sylvester, Secretary, Ray Lewis, William
Clarke and Bruce Taylor
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel,
Lloyd Coffelt, Gabrielle Prior, Don Seitz,
Gordon Jones, William Hurst, Lanny
Eberling and Sut Tamaribuchi
* * * * * * * * * * *
Consideration of Request of
Irvine Ranch Water District
regarding terms of annexation
of territory to the District
between Newport Beach and
Laguna Beach
the District between the cities
The chair recognized Mr. Gordon Jones
representing the Irvine Company, and
Mr. Lloyd Coffelt, representing the Irvine
Ranch Water District (IRWD), who addressed
the Board relative to their request for
terms and conditions for annexation of
approximately 4,000 acres of .territory to
of Newport Beach and Laguna Beach.
Following the presentation, it was the concensus of the Directors that
because of the limited information made available, it would be necessary
for the Irvine Ranch Water District to formally submit pertinent infor-
mation to the District's staff relative to their request before the matter
can be brought back to the Board for further consideration. The staff was
instructed to work with the Irvine Ranch Water District in this regard.
Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
'Tilat this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 5 be adjourned. Tirn Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned
at 5:38 p.m., March 3, 1976.
3/3/76
Secretary of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 5
of Orange County, California
Chairman of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 5
of Orange County, California
-2-