Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-02-11l COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) February S, 1976 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 1976, 7:30 P.M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 111e next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, Cal:lfoTnia, will be held at the above hour and date. _,f ~~7/J·rctary f l/ TELEPHDN ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 -..... ; MANAGER~s AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange Cou nty, California JOINT BOARDS February 11, 1976 -7:30 p .m. Post OHice Box 8127 10844 El I is Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 7 1 4 540-2910 962-2411 The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and wh i ch are not otherwise self-explanatory . Warrant lis ts are not attached to the agenda since they are made up i mmediately pre- ceding the meeting, but will appear in the supplemental agenda available at the meeting. Joint Boards No. 8 -Cl aims Processing Procedures . On January 14, the Boards adopted a new 6 l aims processing procedure whereby the staff is authorized to submit bills to the County Auditor's office concurrently with the Dj.stricts ' biweekly payrolls. We expect this procedure to be in effect sometime in March . Presently, our invested funds mature the Thursday follow- ing the Districts' Joint Board meetings; therefcre, the new pre - cedures c annot be adopted immediately . We have not processed any bills this month; therefore, a warrant listing is not included with the mailed agenda material . A warrant list ing wi ll appear in the supp l emental agenda material to be available at the meeting . No. 9 -a -Award of Job No . J-9 -2 -Surge Tower No. 2 Extension at Treatment Plant No . 2. Bids were received on this budgeted project on February 3rd. Four bids were received ranging from a low of $73 ,000 to $107,000. The engineer's estimate was $11 5,000 (budget , $200 ,000). It is recommended that the Boards accept the low bid submitted by F. T . Zi ebarth Company of Fullerton in the amount of $73,000 . No. 9-b -Award of Job No. PW-050 -Installation of Foul Air Treatment at Plant No. 2 . Bids were received on February 3rd for this facility to treat the foul air from incoming sewers and at Headworks l!C" at Plant No . 2 . Fourteen firms took out plans and specifications for this project , but only two bids were received ($1 47 ,9 69 and $159,200). The low bid was submitted by Skipper and Company of Midway City. The engineer's estimate was $15 8 ,7 98 (budget , $150,000). The design engineer, Hugh Carter and Company , has recommended the award of the contract to Skipper and Company and the staff concurs . No. 9-c -Agreement for Building Maintenance. Bid s were taken Feb ruary 3rd f or a one -year building maintenance contract. Five firms submi tted bids. The maintenance bids r anged fr om $395 to $5~5 per month . It is the staff's recom- mendati on that the award go to the apparent low bidder, Southeast Janitorial Service, Anaheim . Since this s e rvi ce was not budgeted in th e current year, a line item transfer will be necessary for contract ed services in the Joint Operating Budget some time after the thir d quarter of this year . No. 9 -d -Authorization to Enter Into a Health Maintenance Organiz ation Prepaid Medical Insurance Plan . Presently, the Districts have two medical insurance p l ans for th e Districts ' emp loye es . One plan is an HMO prepaid health ma intenance plan which has been carried through the Family Health Plan here in Southern California . In December, the carrier advi sed that the premium for the existing coverage would be increased by 1 3%. As a result , we advertised for competitive bids and three proposals were r eceived . It is the staff 's recommendation that a 12-month contract be entered into with Security Health Plan , as b eing the lowest bidder. We believe the plan submitt ed by this company is superior to t he present coverage and will result in an annual savings t o the District s of approximately $7 ,000 . No. 9-e -Uniform Rental . Seven bids were received t o supply uniforms and miscel- l a neous . shop maintenance supplies for the coming 12 months . They range from $1,167 .80 to $1 ,81 7.35 on a biweekly basis. I t is t he staff 's r ecommendation that a Purc h ase Order contract be issued to the low bidder, L & N Uniforms, Santa Ana , to supply the specified services for the next 12 months . This is an 1 8% reduc tion over current uniform rental rates . No . 9 -f -Purchase of Four -Wheel Electric Carts . For the past se v eral years , the Districts' staff has been p~rchasing electric carts whic h are speci fi cally designed to be utilized as service vehicles for personne l working within each of the treatment plants. This avoids the purchase of larger trucks . We fi nd that the maintenance of t h ese smaller vehicles is inexpensive and yet , their carrying capacity is such that personnel can carry adequate tools to do required work , thereby efficiently util i zing their time. Three firms submitted bids a nd it is the s t aff 's recomme n dation that a Purchase Order be issued for four electric carts f rom the low bidder , Taylor-Dunn Man u facturing Company , Anah eim , in the amount of $9 ,378 .88 . ·-2- No. 9-g -Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies April Conference, Houston . The Assoc i ation of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA), is holding a 3-day nationa l conference ln Houst on , April 1 2 through 14. The meetin g will involve Washington EPA officials, elected sanitation r epresentatives, and management personnel from the 55 member agencies from throughout the United States. The Districts' Ge n eral Manager wil l be attending under authority previous l y given by the Boards in his capacity as AMSA's Vice President and member of its Board of Direct ors . It i s request ed that the Joint Cha irman be authorized to attend also. No. 9 -h -Additional Te mporary Part-time Pos i tions . At the October 1, 1 975 Joint meeting , the Board authorized th e hiring of part-time technicians for the purpose of operating the JPL-ACTS 1-MGD Pilot Plant 24 hours a day , seven days a week. The wage scale for the tempor a ry personnel is $2 .50 to $7 .00 per hour f or ten people . It will be necessary to increase the number of part -time technicians to fifteen (87~% of this operating cost is grant funded). It is the staff 's recommendation that Reso lution No. 75-13 8 be amended to increase the authorization for part-time tec hnicians from ten to fifteen . District No . 2 No. 9-i -Change Order No . 2 to Contr act No . 2-15 -Yorba Linda Pump Station Change Order No . 2, in the amount of $1 4,816 .99 , is recom- mended for the items described in the Change Order which were not a part o f the original cont ract specifications . Included in this Change Order is an item for approximately $9,000, necessitated by the Southern California Edison Company's requirements that any met ering structure shall have a vertical door . Because of recent OSHA regulati ons , Edison has refu sed to supply serv ic e to the Pump Station with the originally specified horizontal d oor for entry into the station . Horizontal doors are installed on our other pump stations; however, these regulations do not apply to our e xisting facilities . During the construct i on of certain on-site improvements b y the University, some 1 600 cubic yards of materia l were removed from the Pump Station site which was originally planned to be in- c orporated in the landscaping i mp rovements adjacent to the Pump Station . The University did not commit this material, but it was included in our contract f or fill material . The contractor was r equired to acquire addit ional ma t erial at a cost of $2,400 . Because of difficulty in procuring certain valves and pumps because of long (in excess of 18 months) delivery time, substitute -3- valv es were offered by the contractor and accepted by the Di strict and the consulting engineer . This acceptance necessitated the changing of the discharge manifold ~t the Pump Station and other pipe fitt i ng operations costing $2,]85 ,37 . Also included in this change order are two minor changes the st af f feel s would aid in the maintenance and operation of the Pump Station . These include the water proofing of th e brick wall around the Pump Station and changes relative to the sensing bubbler tube and station vent line s $197.68 and $449.83 respectively . ' It is the staff 's recommendation that Change Order No . 2 totaling $14,816 .99 be approved . No. 9-j -Chan ge Order No . 2 to Co nt ract No. 2 -14 -4 -Santa Ana River Interceptor. Contractor has requested a change in contract sp ecificati ons for the manhole shafts to ~e supplied on this contract. He has r equested a change from precast shafts to cast -in-place sha ft s at no additional cost to the District. This change will aid the contract o r in his operation and at the same time, provide manholes which are better from a structural and infilt ration standpoint . This Change Order has been approved by the State Water Resources Control Board. The st aff recommends that this Change Order be accepted at no cost to the District . District No . 3 No . 9-m -Payment to City of Westminst er for Traffic Striping, Contract No . 3-21-1. Plan s and specifications for this reach of the Knott Inter - ceptor extending fr om the intersection of Golden West and Westminster Bou levard to approximately 1 000 feet southerly o f Katella Avenue included the provision that the contractor would be re spons ible for the p l acement of all t emp orary traffic striping. The permanent traffic striping was to be performed by the City forces and · billed to the District . This is a standard provision in most of the con- tracts wherein the City would rath e r be directly resp onsible for the restoration of the permanent traffic striping. The staff, theref ore , rec ommends that the amount of $4,560.93 be authorized for payment as invoiced by the City of Westminster . No . 9-n -Change Order No. 4 to Contract No. 3 -20 -1 . This recommended Change Order is the final adjustment in the engineer 's quant ities which adds $2,517 to the contract price . Also include d in this Chan ge Order is a time extension of 92 calendar days for incleme nt weather in 1974, and pipe company labor strikes which r esulted in legitimate delays to the contract or . -4- No. 9-o -Accepting Contract No . 3-20 -1, Knott Interceptor , as Complete. This project, Reaches 5 and 6 of the Knott Interceptor, has been complet ed in accordance with the plans and spec ifications . The staff is recommending adoption of the standard resolution authorizing the filing of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement . The final cos t of this project is $4,606,364.87 (original bid price, $4,602,992). No. 9 -p -Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Bids for a Po rt ion of the Westside Relief Intercep tor , Contract No . 3-21-2 . Pl ans and specifications for this regularly -budgeted con- struction project are now ready for bid . This project c ommences at the intersection of Katella Avenue and Lex ington Drive in the City of Los Alamitos, and proceeds northerly in an easement to b e acquired to Cerritos Avenue, thence northerly in Denni Street to Orange Avenue, thence easterly in Orange Avenue to Moo d y Street, northerly in Moody Street terminating at Crescent Avenue in the City of La Palma. The staffs of the Cities of Lo s Alami t o s, Cypress and La Palma have been consulted re garding the alignment and the construction conditions associated wi th the project . Special conditions were discu ssed in detai l in the Preliminary Engineerin g and the Environme ntal Impac t Report s pTepared for this pro je ct. The interceptor is approximately 15 ,650 feet in length and the pipe size ranges from 30-inch to 15-inch in diameter . The engineer 's estimate for this proj e ct is $1,177,0 00 . It is recommended that the General Manager be authorized to establish the bid date for this project up on receipt of right of way easements for the alignment through private property from Katella to Cerritos . No . 9-q -Acquisition of Easements f or Contract No . 3 -21 -2. The Resolution appearing in the agenda authorizes cond emn ation of rig hts of way for the construction of the Wests i de Re l ief Inter- ceptor between Katella and Crescent Avenues a d istance of 2600 f eet . The permanent easements will v ary in widt h from 10 to 20 feet . The tempora ry construction easemen ts will vary from 30 to 55 feet . The staff and General Counsel ar e n egot iating the acquisi t ion with the two affec ted property owners; how ever , if we are unab le to come to satisfactory t erms, condemnation of the necessary rights of way will be re quired . -5- No. 9-r -Auth o rization to Pay for Chan ge Order .to Flood Con t rol Di strict for Anaheim-Barber City Channel -Westmins ter Avenue Culvert. In January , 1 9 75, the Board approved a uti lit y rel oca tion agreement with the Orange County Flood Control District for the purpose of r elocating a sewer siphon in Westminster Avenue at the crossing of t he Ana heim Barber Flood Control Channel . The plans and specifications for the siphon relocation were included in the Flood Control District's channel widening contract fo r a maximum cost to District No. 3 of $60,500 . The District's cost , based on the actual contract amount , was $52,500 . During con- struction, it was discovered that the Distri ct 's sewe r siphon was not constructed as shown on the p l ans. To better accomplish the relocation , which included bypassing of the sewage , the District awarded a separate contract in the amount of $7,400 to accomplish this . Because of delays and changed conditions, the Flood Co ntro l District 's contractor sustained additional costs and submitted claims to the Flood Control District in excess of $28 ,0 00 . The Flood Control District 's eng ineers, along with the District 's staff , has negotiated this Change Orde r with the Flood Control District's contractor and have mu tual l y agreed upon a lump sum settlement of $5 ,0 00 . It is the staff 's recornmendation that the Board approve this $5,000 change order to be paid i n acc ordance with the provi- sions of the utility relocation agreement . The total cost to the District for the reloc atio n wi l l be $62 ,900. Distr ict No. 5 No . 9-s -En gineerin g Services for Back Bay Drive Trunk Sew er , Contract No . 5 -20 . Pur suant to the Board 's instructions, the staff has nego - tiated. with Simpson-Steppat for the preparation of plans and specifications for the cons truction of the Back Bay Drive Trunk Sewer (East Side) which extends from the e ntrance to the Dunes Park along the easterly side of the Back Bay and along a r i ght of· way in Big Danyon to Jamboree Road, terminating at the Distri ct 's Jamboree Pump Station .. This relief sewer is necessary to a lleviate the overloaded pumping station . It is contempla ted that construction of th is need ed facilit y will commence this f all and be completed by spring of 1977 . Th e proposal from Simpson-Steppat is included in your agenda mate ria l and the staff recommends approval. District No. 7 No. 9-t -Approval of Plans and Spec i fications for Tustin- Orange Trunk Sewer, Contract No . '{-6-9. Th e Di st rict's Master Plan report adopted in 1969 , a long -6- with the preliminary engineering report and the Environmental Impact Report for the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer considered by the Boards in March, 1974, projected the construction of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer extendin~ from the intersection of Mitchell and Red Hill to the northerly terminus in Santiago Canyon Road near the intersection of Linda Vista Street in the City of Orange . Two segm e nts of this trunk sewer have been ~onstructed (7 -6 -6 and 7 -6-7), terminating at the intersection of Fairhaven Avenue and Esplanade Street . At the last Board meeting in January, 1976, the Board awarded the contract for Job No . 7-6-8 which extends the Tustin-Or a n ge Trunk Sewer from the intersec tion of Fairhaven Avenue and Esplanade Street to Santiago Boulevard and Spring Street. Contract No. 7 -6 -9 will complete the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer from the intersection of Santiago Boulevard and Spring Street to the intersection of Santiago Canyon Road and Linda Vista Street. It is recommended that the Board approve the plans and specifications and establish the bid date for receipt of bids on this project as March 30th (engineer 's estimate, $410 ,000). "-·!,,· No . 9-u -Right-of-Way Document Mapping for Di strict No . 7 Trunk Sewer Easements. The staff requested proposals from four civil engineering firms to update and verify our records pertaining to our rights of way and to validate our easement documents relative to all trunk sewer and pumping station fac ili ties . Since the work in- volved litt le professional judgment, the staff felt competitive pric e bidding was in order for the work as outlined . The lowest and most responsible proposal was that submitted by Shelton & Associates in an amount not to exceed $9 ,.527 .50 , which is approxi - mately $6 ,000 les s than the fee submitted b y the next lowest bidd er (budget , $35,000). It is the staff 's r ecommendation that the Board autho r ize the firm of Shelton a nd Associates, land surveyors and engineers from Huntington Beach, to prepare the necess ary documents as . required to update a nd validate District No. 7's rig h t -of-way records. No. 9 -v -Request for Annexation . The Di stric t has r eceived a formal re ques t for annexation of 1.3834 acres in the vicinity of Amapola Street and Handy Creek in the Orange Park Acres area . It is r ecommended· that the request be referred to staff for a report and recommendation to the Board . -7- No . 9 -w -Final Approva l of Annexation No . 47 . Th ~s it em appearing in your agenda orders the annexation o f 1.002 acres to the District in the vicinity of Rangeview Dr ive and Brier Lane . The Board authorized initiation of pro - c eedin g s for annexation in June, 1975 . The Local Agency Formation Commission 's approval has been received and the proponent has paid the re qu ired fe es . It is the staff's recom- mendation that Resolut i on No. 76 -38-7 be approved . Di strict No . 11 No. 9-x -Approval of Plans and Specifications for Manhole Replacement and Repair -Contract No. 11-lR-l . The staff has prepared the plans and bidding sp ecifica- tions for the replacement or repair of 35 det e riorated manhole s on the Newland -Delaware Trunk . The manhole shafts on t his trunk have sustained various degre e s of corrosion due to sulfide attack (budgeted maintenance item of $70 ,000). Al l Districts Nos . 1 1 and 12 -Report of the Executive Comm i tt ee and Recommen dation s on the Committee's Report . Th e Committee met on January 27th and enclosed for the Directors is ·a written rep o rt of their discussions and recommend ed i t ems for consideration by the Boards. No. 13 -Transfer of Intere st in Power Line Between Plants. I ncluded in the agenda supporting material is a staff report recommending the transfer of the Districts ' interest in a 12 KV 3-phase power line betwe en Plants 1 and 2 to the Southern California Edison Company. The staff is recommending transfer of the facilities for $11,500 and other consid erat ions. No . 14 -Forma l Authorization for Application for F ederal and State Construction Gra nt s . Each year, it is ~ec essa ry for the Districts to adopt r esolutions authorizing the execution and filing of documents necessary for applications for Federal and State construction grants . Th i s authority covers the 1975-76 fiscal year . No . 15 -Purchase of Needed Machinery . The staff ha s been searching for a us ed , long-b ed lathe to be used in our maintenance shops for repair and modification of d rive lines , pump sha fts and other sp ecialty equipment related t o wastewater treatment mecha nisms . We are requ es ting autl1ority to -8- p u rchase a u sed 27 11 by 2 4' lathe fr om the Thomas J. Rush Company of Buena Park for an amount not to exceed $10,000 . Included i n t he agenda suppor ting material i s an evaluation report . No. 1 6 -Ve rbal Report of Special Committee . The Special Comm i ttee to Review Staff Procedures Relative t o the Selection of Design En g ineer s will meet Thursday evening , F ebruary 5th , to consider recommended procedures to be used in the se l ection of consulting engineers . The Chairman of the Committee will make a verbal r epo rt to the Boards on the Cqmm i ttee 's progress . District No . 5 No . 28 -Conditions for Annexation of Territor y between Newport Beach and Lag una Beach. A l etter has been received from the Irvine Ranch Water Di str i c t requ est in g condi t ions fo r annexat i on of unincorporated I rvine Company coastal p r operty . No . 29 -Hearing on Pr opos ed Ordinance No . 509 . . Pur suant t o the Board 's direction, the General Counsel has prepared Ordinance No . 509 amending Section 402 of Ordi nance No . 508, increasing the District connection charges to be comparable with the established connection charges in Districts Nos . 2 , 3, and 7 . The pres ent District No. 5 connection charges are $175 for single family dwellings and $90 per 1000 sq . ft ., for new con- struction other than fami l y dwellings . The new ordinance will increase the connection charge to $250 per family dwelling unit and $130 per 10 00 .sq .. ft., of floor area for new construction other than family dwelling units. Notices of the hearing for Ordinance No . 509 h ave been s e nt to all permit holders a nd interested persons and public entities affected by the propos ed change . District No . 7 No . 32 -Fu rther Consideration of the Proposed Annexation of Oran ge Park Acres . A special meeting of the District Board was scheduled f or February 4th to consider the requested annexation of the Orange Park Acres area to th e District . Because of s everal meeting conflicts, the special meeting was not held and the matter was continued to February 11th . The fol l owing is the staff 's eva lua- t ion of the Orange Park Acres annexation proposal dated January 28 , 1 976 : -9- Election Re: Annexation and Improvement District General Obligation Bonds $1 ,141,000 ± · Essentially, the p ro ponents are proposing the formation of an Improv emen t District to j_ssue general obligation bonds followin g a successful annexation/bond election (2/3 majority) in the amo unt of $1,141,000 . The bond pro - ceeds will acquire "r ight of service and use of the District's existing facilitiesn which are equal to the ann exa tion f ees $455 ,4 00 , payment of $671 ,684± for the necessary Master Plan Trunk Sewers , Reaches 17 and 18 ,: to serve the area , and $15 ,000 reimbursement of advances by proponents of the annexation proceedings . Prep aid Connection Charges for Parcels Within Proposed Annexation Each existing parcel within the annexed area as of the dat e of the elect ion will be credited with one connection charge ($2 50 ) at the time the property is hooked to the sewer. (42 5 parcels x $250 per connection equals $106,250). Any division of land after the date of elect ion will result in the property owners obligation to pay additional connection charges . Installation of Lo~al Sewers The property owners will construct the local collector sewers either by cash financing or. by assessment proceedings . Reimbursement of Funds Related to Master Plan Subtrunk System Funded by Bond Issue As a condition of the general obligation bond proceedings, the Sanitation District will contribute, from District -wide collection of connection charges, funds felated to the subtrunk system funded by the bond issue $671,684 -, minus thf prepaid connection charges $106 ,250. These f unds, $565,234 -which will only be payable upon receipt of connection charges , will b e deposited in the Improvement District Bond and Interest Redemption Fund , subjec t to previously authorized Master Plan reimbursement agreements . The proceeds deposited in the Bond Redemption Fund will be used for the purpose of retiring bonds in advance of maturity or for payment of both bond principal and interest when due . -10- ·' . ' Tax Rate to Retire Improvement District Bonds This is the staff's projection of the annual debt service for the issuance of $1,141,000 gene ral obligation bonds for the Orange Park Acres 550 acre annexation. Annual Debt Servi ce -7 percent, 15-y ears $125,300 Annual Improvement District Tax Rate (a) March, 1975 assessed value = $5,465,000 (b) Tax Rate $125,300 = $5,465,000 ~ 100 $2.2928 per $1 00/A .V .** Annual County Sanitation District No. 7 tax rate = $0.4026 per $100/A.V. Total Annual Tax Rate = $2 .6954 per $100/A.V. ** This tax rate will be' reduced by District connection charges collected and transferred to the Improvement Bond and Inte rest Redemption Fund equal to $564,234± during the life of the bonds. No. 33 -Adjustment of Current Annexation Fee . Effective July 1, 197 5 , all Districts adopted a uniform annexation fee policy. The annual annexation fee equa ls each District's assets minus its .liabilities which is the net worth, divided by the number of acres within the District. Therefore, based on this formul a , the District's staff has quoted an annexa- tion fee for District No . 7 in the amount of $1 ,0 29 per acre . During a recent review of the ca lcul ations , we find that the co llection system figures include $3 .6 million for local sewers such as assessment district sewers and l ocal sewers within tracts. Therefore, the staff recommends that the Board authorize an adjust - ment of the annexation fee to $828 per acre, the reby eliminating the inclus ion of local collection systems which have no bearing on the costs of the District's Master Plan system and treatment works. -11- Fred A. Harper General Manager II COAl1DS OF DlfU~CYOl~S County Snnifation Di5trids of Oronge County, California JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE FEBRU.4RY JJ, 1976 -7 :.30 P )1. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) . Roll Call Pest Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 9270i Telephones: Area Code 71 4 540~2910 .. 962-2411 AGENDA ADJCURr~;.:ar1s POSTED.::-:- co::;p & L~IL:J.~E .... ~ ... . FILES ~::T ~;?., ...... ~ .... . RES.::Lu::·~;:s CER~IFiED.~ LEITE~:; ',·,:;:-;T::i( .... ~ ..... M!Nu;;::.; \'/~;F:::i~ ... fi!':".: •••• ~ MINUTES mm ...... ~ .. .. ~~~J./ Fll.E -·~--~I .. -( 3 ) #,\-~ Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary ~ ~-. lffil:;~ ·········-- . \:l: ,,_ ~ A/C •... TKLR -~(..44~)-_jc~o~nq..As:;.;;i'"""cluc~r:::.r:iai.+t4i~o~n~o~f_,mfH-I03-:it~i~o*nr-tt'.--AOi-Tre-c~eeP.-1:;.::i· '~{c~aH=Rk=a'-"*f'4-i-+1.P.e--TRm+iR~UH"t;:...c~e:..:i;utc~e~ey~t~s-, -+i ~f-ia~H~)~·. See supplemental agenda ~ Ot4-~ • ~ ~ ....... ·-···········•••'!•' (5) EACH DISTRICT Considera.tion of motions approving minute~ of the following meetings, as maile·d: ;n/s District 1 January 14, M/.5 District 2 January 14, !J1/'5 District 3 January 14, M/5 District 5 January 14, .IV/ /5 District 6 January 14, r11/ ~ District 7 January 14, February 4, /f//S Distri~t 11 January 14, FILE.·················· (6) LETTE~ •••••••...•.•• ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: A/C .... TKLR .... ,~E ~ •• :.~~fl. -...:_-·-·-·\l·- LETTER •••••••••••••• A/C .•.. TKLR ..•.. J~~~ .... :!..~.;~;;.: t ......_ .. _ •••••• -. •• m .. Joint Chairman General Manager General Counsel 1976 regular 1976 regular 1976 regular 1976 regula.r 1976 regular 1976 regular and 1976 special 1976 regular (7) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of mo tion to receive and fi le certification of the Gen e ral Man age r that he has checked all bills a ppearing on the agenda , found th em to be in order, and that he recomm e nds authorization for paymen t (8) ALL DISTRICTS (8) ROL L CAL L YOTt .....• ",, .. ..- IT:Ms ON SUi'FL[},I El-liAl AG ~NDA Con si deration of rol l cal l vote motion approving Joint Operating an d Capita l Out l ay Re vo l ving Fund accounts payable check registers for signature of t h e Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing p ayme n t of c laims listed on page "I" ; and a pproving accounts payable check r egi s t e rs for s ignature of the Chairman of t he respective Dist rict , and a uthori zing paymen t of sai d claims l iste d on t h e page s indica ted below: DISTRIG-r--l-\~b~"".t."tttrt-s,--:i.4'.-a.-R~ .••...................... NON E DISTRICT 2 warrants -See page "II" DI STRICT 3 warrants -See page "II" 8-I-&HH-G:rS 3 & 11 suspense fund 11arrants, if any ..... NONE DISTRIC T 5 warrants -See page "II" BI-s:r--RICTS 5 & 6 suspense fund warrants, if a~ ..... NONE BISTRICT-6 ',;arrents, if any •........................ NONE "III " DISTRICT 7 warrants -See p a ge ------ DISTRICT 11 warrants -Se e page "II I " (9) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT .CALENDAR Roll Call Vote or Cas t Unanimou3 Ballot ITEMS NOS I 9 (A). THROUGH 9 ( x ) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not r equiring discussion or further exp lanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from .the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in a ttendance, the re will be no separate discussion of th ese items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one ac tion approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items r emoved from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular orde r of business. Members-of the public who wish to remove an item from the cons ent cal endar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. h ~ -\' Consideration of action to a pprove all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- . (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) @./ ....... '::: ........ . ~-LETTE~ •• ecc.:: A/C .... TKLR;/ ,:=_-~t~~: G!.iJ' -~ ..... -:-.: ........ . Ciei~R":).v.::. A/C •••• TK~ ·-~··········· ~/ .. !:. ............ . LETTERS ... ~ .... . A/C .... TKLR .. .. ~~~-~-:'~ '~:.:":---···· FILE ·······~·-· LETTER5 ••• .JL .... A/C .... TKLR •••• ~. •. ll_, , .... ,--~ •. \, ----,,.--~---·---J FILE ••• Jc. ..... LETTER .•.••••••••.•• A/C .... TKLR --- '°:i --·~ / --r-~-=-1-~- FILE ···-············· LETTER •••..•.•....•. A/C .•.. TKLR •... Fi LE •••••.•.•...•....• LETTER •••.••.•...••• A/C .... TKLR •••• -----·-·······••"-lo"loii'S:'\ ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-20, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Surge Tower No. 2 Extension at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-9-2, to F. T. Ztcbarth Company, in the amount of $73,000.00. See page "A" (b) Consideration of 0tmrda1d Resolution No. 76-21, to receive and file bid tabulation and rcco1runendation, and awarding contract for Installation of Foul Air Treatment at Plant No. 2, IIeadworks 11 C11 , Job No. PW-050, to Skipper & Company, in the amount of $147,969.00. See page 11 B" (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-22, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Administration Building Maintenance, Specification No. PW-051, to Southeast Janitorial Service, in the amount of $395.00 per month. See pages "C" and "D" (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-23, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation for HMO Prepaid Medical Insurance Plan, Specification No. I-010, and authorizing the General Manager to execute an agreement with Security Health Plan to provide HMO Prepaid Medical Insurance Plan effective March 1, 19 76. See pages "E" and "F" (e) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation for Specification No. P-023, Uniform Rental (pants, shirts, lab coats, coveralls, shop rags, protective door mats and mops), and authorizing the General Manager to issue a purchase order contract to L & N Uniform Supply in accordance with the unit prices contained in their proposal therefor. See page . "G" (f) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and award purchase of Four (4) 4-Wheel Electric Cars, Specification No. A-081~ to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company, in the amount of $9, 378. 88. See page "H" (g) Consideration of motion authorizing the Joint Chairman to attend the Annual Conference of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies in Houston Texas, from April 12 -14, 1976; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, lodging, meals and incidental expenses incurred (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-24, amending Resolution No. 75-138, establishing temporary part-time technician classification, increasing said authorized personnel from a maximum of 10 to a maximum of 15 employees. See page "I" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) f;LE .••••.•••••••••••• L':TI"ER .•..•••••••••• A/C .... TKLR •••• FILE ..••••.•.•.•••.••• LETTER ·······-···· A/C •... TKLR •••• FIL~···············-­ LETIER V-~---··­ A/C •••. TKLR -- Fl~E _······-·--------·· ~--~--- A/C .... TKLR •••• ...-..····-··-···- FILE ·······-··--- LETTER···- A/C .... TKLR -· ---~-~1-..':: ... _ FILE •....•..•••.•••••• LETTER ···-······- A/C •••• TKLR .... FILE .•..••.••.•••••••• . . ----r~. -rJ"' .• .. -• )'-\ . ' ":t:: (l~~~R')I.'.'.!.~ •• ~ •• ~!.' '-' ~-~~&:-~ ·-·-·----·--·-·--- DISTRICT 2 (i) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Yorba Linda Pump Station, Contract No • .2-15, authorizing an addition of $14,816.99 to the contract with J. Putnam Henck, a Corporation, and Henck Pro, a Joint Venture, for additional work, and approving a time extension of 66 calendar days to accomp I ish said work. Sec page "J" (j) Consideration of notion approving Change Order No. 2 to to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Reach 5, Contract No. 2-14-4, authorizing a change in construction of manholes to the contract with Kasler Corporation and L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc., at no cost to the District. See page "K" DISTRICT 3 (k) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint for Damages, Personal Injuries and Property Damage in Case No. 240551, Barbara Roberts aka Barbara Smith vs. Sully-Miller Contracting Company, et al., relative to the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 & 6, Contract No. 3-20-1, and refer to the District's General Counsel and liability insurance carrier for appropriate action (I) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Darryl Nasser, dated January 19, 1976, in the amount of . $100,000.00, in connection with construction of the Westside Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 and Portion of 27, Contract No. 3-21-1, and refer to the contractor and District's liability insurance carrier for appropriate action (rn) Consideration of motion authorizing payment of an amount not to exceed $4,560.93, to the City of Westminster, for work performed in restoring permanent pavement markings on Goldenwest and Westminster Avenue in connection with construction of the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 & 6, Contract No. 3-20-1 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 & 6, Contract No. 3-20-1, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total addition of $2,517.00 to the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting Company, and approving a time extension of 92 calendar days due to inclement weather and labor strikes which resulted in delays in pipe deli very to contract. See page "L" ----- Consideration of Resolution No. 76-34-3, accepting Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 & 6, Contract No. 3-20-1, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "M" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) FILE ·······-··-····· ---------~ .... ~ ~ffil.?.~.'' 0- L ¥ .... TKLR .•.. ~J..J.~-~ _Q~~~?..:.k.:::: FILE--~··· --- LETTER ...........••. A/C •••. TKLR •••• -~-~-f~-~~--~-~- FILE •••.••.••.•••••••• LETTER •••••••••••••• A/C .... TKLR •••• ·--~rr-~---··· . Fi LE .•• v..: ....... -- ~ f L LETTER ···········-· A/C .... TKLR .... ==~~~= FiLE .......•........•. LETTER .••.•..•••.••• A/C •••• TKLR .-:/° ~--~·-7· ~ .. :. ........ . . Fil.E .: . ..k::.. •..•• _ '~-ETTER ~--~.b .. AIK_ •... TKLR •••• ...E~f--~---·· ·;::-~-........ ./{' ( • ... b ~·I.' ___ ·+····u; ... ._. LETTER ·······-··- A/C ~¥ ~ FILE ..•.•.•.....•••••• C..-~~_TTER·· •• : •• J::.:.~_­ A/C •••• TKLR •.•. .... _··-······"······.:..: .. pISTRICT 3 (Continued) (p) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-35-3, approving plans and specifications for Westside Relief Interceptor, Portion of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 and 29 (from Katella & Lexington Drive to Crescent Avenue), Contract No. 3-21-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the bid date upon acquisition of necessary right of way. See page "N" '-~~,,I "1'1(., ~ ~EL. t>Jj~~ (q) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-36-3, authorizing and directing the condemnation of certain-real property situated in the County of Orange, State of California, in connection with construction of the Westside Relief Interceptor, Portion of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 and 29 (from Katella & Lexington Drive to Crescent Avenue), Contract No. 3-21-2. See page (r) ''0" Consideration of motion authorizing payment of $5,000.00 to the Orange County Flood Control District for additional work incurred in connection with the Utilities Relocation Agreement relative to the District's Westminster Avenue Interceptor Sewer Siphon under the Anaheim-Barber Flood Control Channel DISTRICT 5 (s) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of Simpson-Steppat, dated February 4, 1976, for preparation of plans and specifications for the Back Bay Drive Trunk Sewer (East Side), for a lump sum fee of $34,000.00 See page ''P" DISTRICT 7 ~Consideration of Resolution No. 76-37-7, approving plans and specifications for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 and 16, Contract No. 7-6-9, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on March 30. ~ See page "Q" (u) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of Shel ton & Associates, dated January_ 30, 1976, for right-of-way document maps and reco.rds for the District's trunk sewer facilities, on a per diem fee basis for an amount not to exceed $9,527.50 • See page "R" (v) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Eugene St. Amand for annexation of approximately 1.38 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Amapola Street and Handy Creek, and refer to staff for study and recommendation. See page "S" (w) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-38-7, ordering annexation of approximately 1.002 acres to the District in the vicinity of Rangeview Drive and Brier Lane (Proposed Annexation No. 47 -Rauch Annexation to Colll1ty Sanitation District No. 7) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6) -5- (9) (CONSENT CJ\LENDJ\R continued from page 5) -·-·- ~ ( FILE --·---~---· \._..-- LETIER ••..•.......•• A/C •••• TKLR •••• ~v ____ ......................... . DISTRICT 11 (x) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-40-11, approving plans and specifications for Manhole Replacement and Repair, Contract No. 11-lR-l, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on March 2, 1976. See ·page "T" " END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS (11) M~ Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report -6- ? • (12) ALL DISTRICTS Fl l E ···-·······"'""· lETIER ............ .. Consideration of action on items recomr.i ended by the Executive Committee: A/C •.•• TKLR •••• (a) --·-················· Roll Call Voto or Cast 0 ... ~ ... --··-················· Unan imou s Ba~lot S LETIER ~-~.v (b A/C •••• TKLR ...• ~-\.:·--·~·-- Consideration of Resolution No. 76-32, amending Resolution No. 75-168, Rules and Regulations re Conditions of Employment, incorporating procedures for Layoff and Disciplinary Actions See page "U" Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., dated January 20, 1976, to prepare annual audits for the 1975-76, 1976-77 and 1977-78 fiscal years , for an annual fee of $14,000.00 with p r ovision for escalat ion for the years ending 1977 a nd 1978. See page "V" a.c ~ r.~E ·················· ~Further consideration of the following resolutions establishing ~compensation and reimbursement for expenses for Directors, and repealing existing resolutions for same: "? ~onsideration of motion to receiv~ and file Resolution No.· 842 LETTER ....•....••.•• A/C .•.. TKLR •.•• trEMS 0 ~ of the City of Yorba Linda opposing adoption of Sanitation ~t!DPffMrnTAl AGENDA Districts' resolutions establishing compensation and reimbursement for expenses for Directors. FILE ................•• LETTER .•..•.•...•.•• A/C .•.. TKL R •.•• FI LE ................•. LETTER ···-·······- A/C .••• TKLR ...• FILE °'::.":.::::·.:::::·.:·:·····-· LETTER A/C .•.. TKLR ...• -·-··-···········-··-·· ···-·····F·lff ··::::::: .......... . LETTER ............. . (1) Roll Call Vo te or Cast Unanimous Ballot Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot (2) f\\ \S Roll Call Vote or Cast Una nimous Ballot (3) I\\ s A/C ..•. TKLR •... Roll C•ll Vote or Cast ···-··-········-········ Un animous Ballot FI LE .••.............•. (4) LETTER •............. W\ \S Roll Call Vote or Cast A/C ••.. TKLR ···· Unan imous Ballot ................. DISTRICT 1 Consideration of Resolution No. 76-33-1, fixing compensation for its Directors and rescinding Resolutions No s. 63-128 and 68-3-1. S e e page "W" . OR DISTRICT 1 -(1\5:), ~ ~ ( ~ ~) Consideration of Re so1Utfon No. 76-11-1, establishing the compensation and expe nse reimb urs eme nt policies fo r its Directors, and repealing Resolutions Nos. 63-128 a nd 68 -3-1 See page "X" ~ "\ ~~ ~ -~N-~Q. to 3}t """ DISTRICT 2 •Ok:, Consideration of Res olution No. 76 -12-2, establishing the comp e nsation and expense reimbursement poli cies for its Directors, and rep ea li~g Resolution No. 73 -4~~-r->.-~--~-~­ See page ''X'' ~~.~.~~~ ~~o..Uu.&::\:J..Mll~~-~~,,.C )., ()V DISTRICT 3 -i:,F;. \)· . --~ • Consideration of Resolutio n No. 76-13-3, e stablishing the comp ensation and expense reimbursement po licies f or its Directors, and r epea ling Resolution No. 73-48-3 Seepage "X" ~~~. ~. DISTRICT 5 Consid e"ation of Resolution No. 76-14 -5 , establishing t he compensation an d expense r e i mb ursement po l i cies for its Directors, and r ep e aling Resolution No. 73-51-5 See page ''X'' Q)I ~ -~ ~ FILC:::::: .......... _ LE TTER ·············- A/C .... TKLR ··- IV\I (5) DISTRICT 6 -~ ~ -~ ~ £..A.A.4..i . Con s ide ration of Reso lution No. 76 -1 5-6 , estab li shing the Roll Call Vote or Casi t · d · l · 1 · · f · Unanimo us Ball ot • comp ensa ion an expense re1 m1urseme nt: po ic:i.es ·or its (6) f\I\\ s LETIER ·············-Roll C~I/ Vote or Cas t FI LE .••.............•. A/C ..•. TKL R ·--Unan imo~~ 8al 1ot Dir ec tors, a nd repeal ing Resol ution No. 73-52-6 4.:·-··· See page "X" t.u l ~..Qµ~Jy M ~f-1 ~~ J ~ · rl'M..I,,_,_,.,...,.,,. DI STR I CT 7 \;,.Q"'°* ~aAh Con siderati on of Res olution No . 76 -16-7, estab lish ing the compensation and e xp e nse r e i rr:bu rs err.ent po lici e s for its Directors , a nd repealing RC1,!jplut i o ;1 No . 7.:.5..r:~ \'"'O See p age --~-~ Q...~lj-tPtsi... ~~-- -7- (13) FILE············_····,,·· ~ lfTTER ···=:_\··rfl ~ •••. TKLR ,... ... ).! _-.:·, · (14) • Roll Call Vo!c or Cast Un::inimrus B:!llot FlLE ·-----------·-----/ R£L-V LETTER ··-··-----···· A/C ••.. TKLR .... ·Fl.LE -··········v .. ·•• ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion declaring inten~ to transfer Districts' interest in 12 KV, 3-phase power line between Plants Nos. 1 and 2, to the Southern California Edison Company (SCE), for consideration of $11,500.00 and the condition that SCE provide emergency and standby capabilities. See page "Y" ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following resolutions authorizing and directing execution and filing of documents necessary for Federal Grants under 33 U.S.C., 466 et seq. and State Grants under Clean Water Bond Law of 1970, for 1975-76 Joint Works Improvements and Additions: See page "Z" District No. Resolution No. /\t L> 2 76-25-2 M.l .S 3 76-26-3 5 76-27-5 "'tl 5 6 76-28-6 '11/ $ 7 76-29-7 A-t( 5 11 76-30-11 M/;;i 1 76-31-1 ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate purchase of used z7u x 24' lathe, for an amount not to exceed $10,000.00 including tax and delivery, from Thomas J. Rush Company. See page "AA" ~-~j·f~;~~~~2cQ§)) ALL DISTRICTS LETIER ····•·•··••••• /l\\S Verbal report of Special Cammi ttee to Re}Qew, Staff Procedures re ~~-~:::::.: .. :::: Selection of Design Engineers -G..P~ ~~ .......................... (17) AL DISTRICTS tions (18) suppl s, if any (19) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adj oum g·,.::s {p (20) (21) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~·· . .sg (22) (23) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn <f" ·. 5 q (24) s or supplementa agenda items, if any -8- (25) (26) (27) (F1~",_c?.__'_~(.28) LETTER ••............ A/C •••. TKLR .... ~:.~~-J ----···--········- (29) FILE ······-·········- LETTER~---·r , •• ~. v- A/C .•• TKLR ••• ·J .1 . I v· ___ ;,::.~-1..J-~ ••••• .Jt:f "./ ', "-v ---~:~~ .. !;~.'.;. ....• I (30) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~:,5f if any DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn g:.:s'f DISTRICT 5 (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Irvine Ranch Water District, dated January 6, 1976, inquiring as to possible conditions for annexation of territory between Newport Beach and Laguna Bea·ch to the District. See page "BB'' (b) Discussion DISTRICT 5 Consideration of Proposed Ordinance No. S09, an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. SOS, as amended, and Ordinance No. 508, Pertaining to Connection Charges. See page "CC" (a) Open hearing q .. o 5 (b) Report of Secretary (c) (d) (e) (t) (g) CV\}~ Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 509, an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. SOS, as amended, and Ordinance No. 508, Pertaining to Connection Charges, by title only, and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). Comments by general public, if any (1) Receive and file written conunents, if any ~~ ~ (2) Close hearing q._ 01 suggestions and other ral public and Directors, Consideration of motion to introduce Ordinance No. S09, an Ordinance ArnendingOrdinance No. SOS, as amended, and Ordinance No. 508, Pertaining to Connection Charges, and pass to second reading on March 10, 197S, at 7:30 p.m. in the District's administrative office (31) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn q: I o . -9- .@DISTRICT 7 (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file legal opinion of FILE .•.......•••••.••• LETTER •••••••••••••• -,~~-h ~-lD the District's General Cminsel relative to the request of the proponents of annexation of the Orange Park Acres area to establish an improvement district solely to pay the District annexation fees. See page "DD" (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Peggy L. McElligott, Attorney for Orange Park Association; dated January 28, 1976, regarding Proposal for Concurrent Annexation and Bond Authorization -Orange Park Acres. See page "EE" (c) Consideration of request of Orange Park Association re annexation and conditions therefor, as determined by the Board ~DISTRICT 7 ~ Consideration of Resolution No. 76-39-7, amending Resolution No. 75-44-7 Roll Call Vote or Cast establishing annexation policy re computation of annexation acreage FILE ·········UA!Hftmou Ballot ' fee. See page "FF" A/C •••• TKLR •.• ~~ DISTRICT 7 Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any ~A.UaAOg~ ~ '\<.:t) ~· • DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn q ·,~ '/ (35) -10- II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ell is Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: ALL DISTRICTS JOINT BOARDS SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS FEBRUARY 11, 1976 -7:30 P.M. Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA (8) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Ftmd accotmts payable check registers for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing payment of claims listed on page "I" ; and approving accotmts payable check registers for signature of the Chairman of the respective District, and authorizing payment of said claims listed on the pages indicated below: fHS'f'RICT 1 warta:ttts, if any ......................•... NONE DISTRICT 2 warrants -See page "II" DISTRICT 3 warrants -See page "II" DiSTRICTS 3 ~ 11 suspoRso fUH:Ei waPrants, if an~ ..... NONE DISTRICT 5 wa·n·ant& -See page "II" DISTRICTS 5 & 6 suspense nmEi warrants, if ~Y.. ••••• NONE DISTRICT 6 '•iEll'l'a-Hts, if any •.•.•.••...••............ NONE DISTRICT 7 warrants -See page "III" DISTRICT 11 warrants -See page "III" (12-c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Resolution No. 842 of the City of Yorba Linda opposing adoption of Sanitation Districts' resolutions establishing compensation and reimbursement for expenses for Directors. WARRANT NO. 2863~ 28633 2~634 286 35 28636 28637 28638 2863 9 28640 28641 28643 28644 28645 28646 28647 28648 28649 28650 28651 28653 28654 28655 28656 2865 9 28660 28662 28663 28664 28665 _ 28666 28667 28668 28669 286 70 28 671 28672 28673 28 674 2867 5 28676 .2e677 2e67 9 286 80 286 e1 2868 3 2868 4- 28685 2868 6 28687 28688 28690 2869 1 2869 2 2 ~693 28695 "l-1" JO INT OPERATING FUND WARRAN TS IN FAVOR OF A & S Building Maintenance Co., Janitorial Service Advance Electric, Re pair Bearing Ai r California , Air Fare, Various Me etings All Bearin g Service, Inc., Se a l s, Be arings & V-Belts American Cyanamid Company, Chemicals Ameren Corrosion Control Division, Protective Coatings The Anchor Packin g Co., Gasket Material V. B. And e rson, We lding Supplies Arr9 w-Risc o , Inc., Samplin g Supplies Associated Concrete Products, Inc., Concrete Ralph W. Atkinson Company, Valves BRW Safety Supply, Sa fety Signs Banning Battery Com pany, Ba tteries Barnes & Delaney, Dewater i ng ·supplies Beckman Instruments, 11 0n Ri ngs L. W. Bemis Tractor & I mplements, Equ i pment Re pair Benz Engineering , Inc., Pump & Compressor Parts Black & De cker Mf g . Co., To o l Repa i r Blower Paper Comp a n y , Hardwa re Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment exams CS Company, Freight Cal's Cameras, Photo Processing & Supplies CASA, Me mbershi p F e es Castle Co ntrols, Inc., Valves Chandler's Refrige ration, Equipment Repair Co ast Nut & Bolt Co., Hardware Co llege Lumber Co ., Inc ., Bui lding Mater i als Co ns o lidat ed Electr i ca l Di s t brs., Electric Supplies Co ntinent a l Radiat o r, Radia tor Repa ir F . B. Co o ~ Corp ., Raise Ma nholes Le e L. Cory, Empl o y e e Mile a g e Costa Me sa Auto Pa rts, Inc., Truck Pa rts Charles P. Crowley Co ., Mete r Pu mp Re pair Culligan De ion i z e d Wa t er Service, Lab Su pplie s C~ R. Dav i s Supply Co ., Hos e De cke rt Surg ical Comp any, First-A i d Suppl i es De co, Samp ling Pa rts 'De Guelle & S ons Gla ss Co ., Truck Repa i r Di amond Core Dr i lli n g Co ., Co r e Dr i lli n g Di amond -Ne wport Ic e Co ., Samp ling Ma terials Ni ck DiB e nedetto, Employee Mi l e a g e Dow Ch emi ca l Compa ny , Te st Ma t e rials Ida L. Du e sb e r g , Employe e Mil e a ge Ea stma n, Inc ., Of f ice .Supp lie s Electric Balancin g Co ., Centr i fu ge Re pair Enchant e r, Inc .·; Ocean Services En g ine & Compress o r Supply Co ., En g ine Parts Enterpri se Printing Comp any , Print i n g Era wan Garden Ho tel, CASA Lo d g ing Es s i c k Ma c h ine r y Co ., Compre sso r Pa rts Filter Sup p ly Co ., Filters Fische r & Po rte r Com pany, Instrume nts F ische r & Po rte r Compa ny, Re c o rde r & Pu mp Parts Cl i fford A. F o rke rt, En gi n ee ring S e rv i ces Com pre ss o r Pr o duc t s Division, Co mp r ess or Repair '• AMOUNT $ 366.00 33 .70 53,1.J ~ l,443.5b 10,28 0.55 825.34 124.03 83.21 50.88 89 .04 8 9 .81 18.44 482.02 3,844.62 85 .03 34 .87 444.62 41.95 8?.48 26.00 8.50 159.80 1,610.00 82.8 4 54.oo 243 .17 201.07 1 ,256 .71 135 .32 6,000 .00 4.50 531. 56 742.00 .40 . 00 71 .55 45 .05 74 . 2.0 142 . 01 12 7 .00 15 .90 79 .80 6,57 9 .23 13.05 8 56 .27 12 5 .00 3,000 .00 687 . 44 21.04 321.84 12 9 . 47 377 .53 1,015 .10 2, 60 9 . 6 r 3,338 .73 21 0 .00 "l-1" WARRAN'r NO. 28696 28697 28698 2R6J9 702 ~703 28704 28705 28707 28708 28709 28710 28711 28712 28713 28716 28717 28719 28720 28721 28723 28721.t 2'd725 28726 28727 28728 28729 28730 28731 28732 28733 28735 28736 28737 . 28738 , 28739 28740 28741 28742 28743 287114 28745 28746 28747 28748 28749 2'd750 28751 28752 28753 28754 28755 28756 28757 ,_..,758 "1-2" IN FAVOR OF Edward R. Francis, Pl-16 Inspection Expenses $ GAF Corporation, Printer Repair Ganahl Lumber Co., Building Materials Garden Grove Lumber Company, Pallets General Electri.c Supply, Electric Supplies Georgia Pacific Corporation, Chlorine General Telephone Company Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Grit Removal Graybar Electric Co., Electric Supplies Hach Chemical Company, Inc., JPL Test Equipment Hanson 1 s Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies Harbor Fire Protections, Inc., Fire Extinguisher Service Ha.rris Conveyor & Rentals, E1..fuipment Rental Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease Hilti Fastening Systems, Hardware Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires Honeywell, Inc., Recorder Parts Jack Hoopaugh Backhoe Service, Equipment Rental Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies, Rope & Valves City of Huntington Beach, Water Irvine Ranch Water District, Water Jeffery Chain, Chain Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies King Bearing, Inc., Bearings & Seals Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump & Pump Parts Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies s. P. Kinney Engineers, Inc., Strainer Parts Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware & Tools LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tools & JPL Supplies L & N Uniforms Supply Co., Uniform Service Lakewood Pipe Service, Pipe Judy Lee, Employee Mileage Lewco Electric Company, Truck Parts & Repair A. J. Lynch Company, Hardware McKinley Equipment Corp., Freight McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Hardware Mayday Tool & Supply Company, Tools Metropolitan Supply Co., Gauges Mine Safety Appliances Co., Safety Equlpment & Test Supplies Mitchell Manuals, Inc., Technical Manuals Morgan Equipment Company, Equipment Parts E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Covers & Rings National Lumber Supply, Building Materials & Tools Nelson-Dunn, Inc., Engine Parts Newark Electronics, Electronic Parts City of Newport Beach, Water Nolex Corporation, Reproduction Supplies Occidental College, Ecology Trawl Orange Coast Hardwood, Building Materials Orange County Chemical Co., Chemicals Orange County Stamp Co., Office Suppl~es Orange Empire Travel Bureau, EPA Air Fare Orange Valve & Fjtting Co., Pipe Supplies AMOUNT 191.46 217.15 295.23 36.21 2,309.53 6,335.20 2,494. 94 46. 74 3,078.00 546.19 648.08 29.38 lb.85 992.08 105.00 71.t 3. 51 134.62 1,164.80 40.06 363.00. 1,742.91 26.02 1.75 l,4Lt9.07 349.10 86.26 2,121.76 152.32 168.61 552.17 148.16 2,202.41 496.08 16.80 158.97 416.17 10.25 47.80 16.28 107.95 231.t. 79 24.82 143.56 372.91 183. 96 69.72 52.81 5.00 80.33 450.00 84.80 31.80 12.20 359.11 75.53 "1-2" WARRANT NO. 28759 28761 2ts762 28763 28764 28765 28766 28767 28·768 28769 28770 28771 2ts773 28774 2~775 28776 28777 28778 28780 28781 28782 28783 28784 28785 28786 28787 28788 28789 28790 28791 28793 28794 28795 28796 28798 28799 28800 28801 28802 28803 28805 28806 28Bo8 28809 28810 28811 28812 28813 28814 28815 28816 28818 28819 28820 28821 II 1-3" IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT Oxyeen Service, Cylinder Rental Pacific Telephone Company $ . 69.30 452.12 47.07 43.1~ llt3. 2S Petroleum Dynamics, Metering Supplies Phipps & Bird, Inc., Lab Equipment Parts Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies Tom Ponton, Inc., Pump Parts Porter Boiler Service, Inc., Boiler Parts Prentice-Hall, Inc., Technical Manuals Productool, Inc., Tools & Equipment Parts Pyramid Fence Co., Fencing Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal The Register, Bid Notice I-010, P-023 & PW-051 The Republic Supply Co., Pipe Supplies & Compressor Parts Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Steel Alan Ries, Lateral Location Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts Ruff's Saw Service, Sharpening S & J Chevrolet, Truck Parts Sand Dollar Business Forms, Printing Santa Ana Blue P~int Co., Printing Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Tubing W. D. Schock Co., Manhole Repair Materials Scientific Products, Lab Supplies City of Seal Beach, Water Sears, Roebuck and Co., Tools Security Industrial Supply Co., Pipe Supplies See Optics, Safety Glasses S. Fo Serrantino, Employee Mileage Service Tape & Label Company, Mailing Supplies Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies Singer Business Machines., Office Supplies Southern California Edison Company South Orange Supply, Pipe Supplies Southern California Gas Company Southern California Water Company Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Oil Company, Diesel Fuel, Gasoline & Oil Starow Steel, Steel Sterling Art & Engineering Supplies, Drafting Supplies Sun Electric Corporation, Electric Supplies The Suppliers, Hardware, Tools & Ladders J. Wayne Sylvester, Director of Finance, Petty Cash Reimb .. T-Girl Temporary Employment, Temporary Warehouse Help Tatkin Company, Pump Parts Taylor-Dunn, Equipmeqt Parts Thompson Lacquer Company, Paint Supplies Trexler Compressor, Inc., Compressor Parts Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Steel Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Meter Maintenance United Parcel Service, Freight-Out United Reprographics, Inc., Printing United States Elevator Corp., Maintenance Agreement United States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts 233.63 31.80 22.08 101.78 166.42 64.oo 63.00 94. 55 291.11 100.00 816.43 55.37 265.76 528.46 26.34 100.01 178.23 19.84 57.76 1,007.06 21~7. 53 66.25 24. 90 101.89 496.75 54.85 57,738.67 325.63 2,Lt65.59 3.00 213.38 115.17 4,133.60 604 .43 22.90 37.74 1,555.76 271.98 504.39 51.65 682.70 469.10 355.10 201.28 1,857.87 355.74 70.43 16.41 33.0,. 427.2~ "l-3" WAHRA N'l" NO. 28822 28823 28824 ~0 825 ~27 28828 28829 28830 28831 28832 28833 28834 28835 28836 28838 28839 28840 28841 28842 28843 .28844 28845 28846 II 1-4" IN FAVOR OF University of Calif., Irvine Regents, JPL Computer Model$ Utilities Supply Company, Hardware Van Waters & Rogers, Chemicals VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage Guy L. Warden & Sons, Pipe Supplies Warren and Ba1ley Co., Inc., Gauges Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts R. V. Weatherford Co., Pump Parts Western Belting, Protective Coating Western Salt Company, Salt Western Wire & Alloys, Hard Facing Westinghouse Electric Corp., Electric Supplies Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel World Travel Bureau, Inc., Air Fare, Pl-16 Inspection Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage John M. Wright, Employee Mileage Wyle Laboratories, Consultanting Service Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Services George Yardley Associates, Controls Donald Winn, CASA Workshop AMOUNT 31).07 278.19 2,022.36 176.22 41.10 40.62 59.89 184.63 820.72 15.12 51.94 . 54.12 6g6.42 88.53 3,793.61 4 31. 47 18.15 22.50 463.00 3,947.75 1,286.41 118.95 145.20 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING $ 174,931.1.J2 "I-4" WARRANT NO. 28652 28657 28658 28661 28678 28682 28689 28694 28700 28706 28714 28715 28718 28722 28734 28760 28772 28779 28792 28797 28804 28807 28817 28826 28837 II I-5" CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Bowe~ Engineering, Inc., JPL Flash Dryer $ John Carollo En~ineers, Engr. Services, ACTS, Fae. Plan Hugh Carter Engineering Corp., Engr. Services P2-ll-2 Cleveland Mixer Corp., Retention JPL Mixers Donova~ Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16 Eastman, Inc., Desk Fairbanks Morse Pump Division, JPL Pumps, PW-045 Forkert Engineerin~, JPL Survey & Engr. Design P2-8-8 General Conveyor, Inc., JPL Conveyor J. B. Gilbert & Associates, Fae. Plan EIR J. Putnam Henck, Contractor, JPL-ACTS Hermes Plastics, Tools Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Management Pl-16 ' Hopper Service Parts Company, Tools LFE Corporation, JPL Sludge Pump Pacific Pumping Company, Retention JPL Pumps The Register, Bid Notice PW-050, J-9-2 & A-081 Sande Equipment Co., Inc., Retention JPL Filter Siemag Systems, Inc., Digester Cleaning Equipment, E-076 Southern California Testing Lab., Testing Pl-16 Donald E. Stevens, Inc., Engineering Services Fae. Plan The Suppliers, Motor & Tools Twining Laboratories, Testing Pl-16 Victor Comptometer Corp., Office Equipment Wilson Ford Sales, New Vehicles A-079 AMOUNT 50,000.08 32,673.8~ 750.0v 4,Lt32.20 592,347.19 25LJ. 40 5~897.60 7Lt5. 91 6,107.60 5,776.31 240,354.29 409.0? 12,029.65 159.10 40,636.00 1,098.63 223.66 845.88 70,400.00 348.97 2,000.00 1,333.17 30.00 398.62 7,570.92 TOTAL CORF $ 1,076,823.02 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF $ 1,251,754.44 "1-5" DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL.OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS wmmANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 28595 28596 28597 28598 28594 28599 2.8600 28601 28602 J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation, Contractor 2-15 Kasler Corporation, Contractor 2-14-4 Lowry and Associates, Engineering Services 2-14-3, 2-14-4 & 2-15 Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 2-14-4 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 3-20-1, 3-20-2 3-21-1 & 3-21-2 Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 3-20-1 & 3-20-2 Sully-Miller Contracting Company~ Contractor 3-20-1 Title Insurance & Trust Company, Title Report 3-21-2 A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Saliba, Contractor 3-21-1 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 28601A City of Newport Beach, Connection Fee Administration ·~ "II" $ AMOUNT 22,280.13 100,966.95 6,235.00 234.00 $ 129,716.08 $ 5,840.35 1,638.00 4,466.00 325.00 10,156.00 $ 22,425.35 $ 2,024.48 "II" DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 28602A State of C~lifornia, Annexation #47 Processing Fee 28603 28604 28605 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 7-6-9 Jennings Halderman Hood, RA 20 Reimbursement The Tustin News, Bid Notice 7-6-8 DISTRICT NO. 11 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 28606 Clifford L. Thompson Construction Company, Contractor 11-4R "III" $ $ AMO~ 85.00 7,947.20 1, 181.12 83.16 $ 9,211.48 $ 9,296.48 $ 4,141.17 ."III" ,, . -~ ;· RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS FEBRUARY 11) 1976 -7:30 P.M. II A" Engineer's Estimate $115,000.00 B I D TABULATION S H E E T Date February 3, 1976 -11:00 A.M. · Contract For: SURGE TOWER NO. 2 EXTENSION AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. JOB NO. J-9-2 CON'l1RACTOR F. T. Ziebarth Co~ Fullerton, Callfornia J. Putnam Henck, A Corp & Henck Pro Joint Venture San Bernardino, California James E. Hoagland Long Beach, California Donovan Construction Co~pany Santa Ana, California ITEM 1 ITEM 2 TOTAL ITEM 1 ITEM 2 TOTAL lTEM 1 ITEM 2 TOTAL ITEM 1 ITEM 2 TOTAL *Bid Irregularity -Bid Amounts Reversed TOTAL BID $62,500 · · ·10,soo $73, 000 $ 8,861 * "74,978* $83,839 $ 90,200 10;300 $100, 500 $ 97,000 10,000 $107,000 AGENDA ITEM #9CA) -ALL DISTRICTS II A" "B'! ' \ ' Engineer's Estimate $158,798:00 B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N SHEET Date February 3, 1976 -11: 00 A. M. Contract For: INSTALLATION OF FOUL AIR TREATMENT AT PLANT NUMBER 2, HEADWORKS C 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. JOB NO. PW-050 CONTRACTOR Skipper & Company Midway City James E. Hoagland Long Beach TOTAL BID $147,969~00 $159,200.00 AGENDA ITEM #9(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "B II II C" RESOLUTION NO. 76-22 APPROVING ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHEAST JANITORIAL SERVICE FOR ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE, SPECIFICATION NO. PW-051 * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the tabulation of bids for Administration Building Mainten- ance, Specification No. PW-051, and the proposal of Southeast Janitorial Service therefor, be received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That certain agreement dated March 1, 1976, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, and Southeast Janitorial Service, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to execute said agree- ment on behalf of the Districts in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 11, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #9(c) -ALL DISTRICTS II C" "D" '.' D I D T A B U L A T I 0 N S JI E E T Date February 3, 1976, Jl:QQ a.m. Contract For: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATIO.N NO. rw.:osl 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. CONTRACTOR MO. JANITORIAL SERVICE WINDOW CLEA.~ING Southeast Janitori~l Service 1016 s. Chantilly st. Anaheim, CA 92806 A & S Building Mtce. Co. 1100 Quail Street ~ewport Beach, CA 92660 Premiere Mtce. of Orange County 12112 Brookhurst #9 Garden Grove, CA 92640 Porte's Building Maintenance 2006 Port Ramsgate Place Newport Beach, CA 92660 Certified Building Mtce., Inc. 17925 Sky Park Circle, Suite K Irvine, CA 92707 $395-00 $ 95.00 411.00 ·. 70. 00 520.00 40.00 525.00 144.oo 545.00 69.00 It is recommended that award be made to the Southeast ·Janitorial Service, 1016 s. Chantilly Street, Anaheim, as the lowest and best bidder. q,v171 et2--ik w. N. Clarke Superintendent AGENDA ITEM #9(c) -ALL DISTRICTS "D" "E II RESOLUTION NO. 76-23 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH SECURITY HEALTH PLAN RE HMO PREPAID MEDICAL PLAN A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AND AlITHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH SECURITY HEALTH PLAN TO PROVIDE !IMO PREPAID MEDICAL INSURANCE PLAN, PURSUANT TO SPECIFICATION NO. I-010 * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the tabulation of bids for HMO Prepaid Medical Insurance Plan, Specification No. I-010, and the proposal of Security Health Plan to provide HMO Prepaid Medical Insurance Plan effective March 1, 1976, pursuant to said specification, be received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the General Manager be authorized to execute an agreement between Security Health Plan and County Sanitation District No. 1 on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7, and 11 for said services effective March 1, 1976; and, Section 3. That all other proposals received for said services are hereby rejecte~. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 11, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #9Cn) -ALL DISTRICTS II E II II F" B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N S H E E T Date February 3, 1976, 11: 00 a. m. '-61 Contract For: HMO PREPAID MEDICAL INSURANCE PLAN SPECIFICATION NO. I-010 FIRM SINGLE 1. Security Health Plan $29.90/Mo. Santa Ana, CA 2. FHP 29.55 Long Beach, CA 3. Ross-Loos Medical Group 33.94 Los Angeles, CA 4. s. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. TWO PARTY $59.80/Mo. 72.33 67.87 AGENDA ITEM #9(n) -ALL DISTRICTS FAMILY $81.86/Mo .. 89.15 95.01 II F" B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N S H E E T Contract For: UNIFORM RENTAL, SPECIFICATION NO. P-023 Pants 1. 2. 3. Shirts Lab Coats Coveralls Shop Rags Protective Door Mats Mops SUPPLIER L & N Uni form Santa Ana, CA Prudential Overall Supply Santa Ana, CA Standard Industrial Towel & Uniform Supply Huntington Beach, CA 4. General Industrial Uniform Rental Orange, CA 5. Ideal Uniform Rental Garden Grove, CA Date February 3, 1976, 11:00 a.m. TOTAL BI-WEEKhY BID BASED ON EST'D. QUANTITIES $ 1,167.80 .1,240.99 1,419.20 1,424.97 1,716.64 6. Modern Coverall & Uni form Supply, Inc. 1, 72 2. 30 Norwalk, CA 7. Best Washington Uniform Supply, Inc. 1,817.35 Long Beach, CA uG" AGENDA ITEM #9(E) -ALL DISTRICTS "G" "H II B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N S H E E T Date January 29, 1976 11:00 a.m. Contr~ct For: . FOUR ( 4). 4-WHEEL ELECTRIC CARS SPECIFICATION NO. A-081 CON'l1RACTOR . 1. Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company 2114 W. Ball Rd. Anaheim, CA 92804 2. Dutch Stark Co. 18217 Anninta St. Reseda, CA 91335 3. Westinghouse Electric Corp. 26701 Redlands Blvd. · . TC>TAL BID $ 9,378.88 9,688.40 (262 Models) 10,248.08 (264 Model~) 11,426.80 Redlands, CA 92_3_7_3 ___________________________ _ It is recommended that award be made to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company, 2114 W. Ball Rd., Anaheim, CA, in the amount of $9,378.88 as the lowest and best bid. qJ'n~ W. N. Clarke Superintendent , AGENDA ITEM #9(F) -ALL DISTRICTS II H II II I II RESOLUTION NO. 76-24 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 75-138, AS AMENDED A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 75-138, ESTABLISHING TEMPORARY PART-TIME TECHNICIAN CLASSIFICATION, AS AMENDED, AUTHORIZING INCREASE OF SUCH PERSONNEL * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. 'Ibat Section 3 of Resolution No. 75-138 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 3. 'Ibat the General Manager is authorized to employ a maximum of 15 employees in said position in any one time; and," Section 2. 'Ibis resolution shall become effective February 12, 1976. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 11, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #9(H) -ALL DISTRICTS II I II COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER J. Putnam Henck. A Corp •• and CONTRACTOR: Hcnck Pro. a Joint Venture C. O. NO. 2 --~--~~~~~~----~ DATE February 3 1 1976 --~----~--~------~----~ JOB: YORBA LINDA PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 2-15 --------------~--~--------------------~------------------------------------------~ Amount of th i·s Change Order (ADD) (:QJ;W~x) $ 14,816.99 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract pric~ are hereby approved. ·ADD: 1. 2. 3. 4. s. 6. Support of the discharge manifold for this pump station. Removing the spools, cutting, reflanging and placing a portion on each side of the check valve so that proper clearance on the weight arm on the check valve will be maintained. Additional supports to support check valve in its relocated position. Outside stair well vertical door saw cut into the side of the pump station beside the center landing on the existing staircase. (Ref. CSUF letcr dated 12-8-75, Lowry & Associates letter dated 6-2-75, and So. Cal. Edison letter dated ll-19~74) Provide an additional 1600 c.y. of material for backfill and landscaping around pump station. Change the bubler tubes and vent lines and galvanize between the putips and wet well. Waterproofing brick wall around pump station. TOTAL ADD "J-1" AGEN~A ITEM ~9(1) DISTRICT 2 215.68 2.033.08 536.,61 8,984.11 2,400.00 197. 68 $14,816.99 "J-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER PAGE TWO · J •. Putnam Hcnck, A Corp., and :o~ACTOR: Hcnck Pro, a ·Joint Venture C. 0. NO. 2 --~~~-------------------~ DATE February 3, 1976 JOB: YORBA LINDA PUMP STATION, CONTRACf NO. 2-15 ---------------------------~------------------------------~---------~---------------------------------------~---------- TIME EXTENSION The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of time for work accomplished in Change Order No. 2 Items 1, 2, and 3 For-work accomplished in Change Order No. 2 Item 4 For 'l'r·ork accomplished .in 'Change Order No. 2 Item 5 For work accomplished in Change Order No. 2 Item 6 For work accomplished in Change Order No. 2 Item 7. TOTAL TIME EXTENSION 30 .Calendar Days 30 Calendar Days 5 Calendar Days 0 Calendar Days 1 Calendar Day 66 Calendar Days SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this Change Order Total Time Extension · Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date 0rigina1 SeptelI'her 26, 1975 360 Caiendar Days Septe~her 21, 1975 66 Calendar Days . 81 Calendar Days 441 Calendar Days December 11, 1975 Contract Price $ 671, 146. 00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 7,500.00 . This Change (ADD) ()08~ $ 14,816.99 Amended Board-authorization date: February 11, 1976 By~ Consulting Engineer By ____ ~~~~------------------~----~~ "J-2" Cont rue tor AGENDA ITEM f~C1) , Contract Price $ 693,462.99 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By ____________ ~------~----~~~~- Chief Engineer DISTRICT 2 "J-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTR'ICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P, O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER KASLER CORPORATION & L. H. WOODS & CONTRACTOR:~--.S~ON-...;;;..S.--~IN'--C~·~~~~~~--~~~~~--- c.o·. No. 2 ~~~--~~~~~- DATE --~~~~~--~~~~~~~- JOB: SANTA ~A RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH 5, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ o.oo In accord~nce with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work arc hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's letters dated November 17 & 26, 1975. For the construction of cast-in-place manhole shafts with the exception of the cones in lieu of precast manhole shaft sections with.the following stipulations: i: . The cone for these manhole shafts shall be detachable. 2. Previsions shall be made in those areas where future roadway is to be constructed for the shaft to be lowered or raised where· needed in the future~ 3. Fabrication of the manhole shafts shall be done in accordance with acceptable engineering practices with regard to loading and in accordance with applicable AST.M s tand~rds. -No additional cos1 to the· District for the above changes. No time extension this change order. -~~--~~--~--~~~-------~~~~~~-~~~--~--~--~~--~ ~~~~~~--~~~ Or.iginal Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) Amended Contract Price Board authorization date: January 14, 1976 Approved: $ 4, 24 0) 95 7. 00 --- $ (5,180:00) ~~~--~~--~- $ 0.00 ~~--~--~~~~ $_4, 235, 7T}_:_~_o __ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California By __________ C_o_n_s_u_l_t i 119 E II g rncer By Chief En9ineer Contrnctor II K" .AGENDA ITEM #9(J) -DISTRICT 2 II K" COUNTY SANITATJON·DI~TRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. o. nox 8127 -lOllftlt ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER 4 C.O. NO. ----~~~~~~~----~-- :ONTRACTOR: Sully-m 11 er Contracting Company February 3, 1976 JOB: KNOIT INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 5 AND 6, CONTRACT NO. 3-20-1 Amount of this Change Order (/\DD) (DEDUCT) $ OoOO In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or :ontract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES ADD:,.. Item No. Unit · 7 L. F. 10 V.F. DEDUCT: 11 LoF. 14 EACH 15 EAQi 16 c. y. "L-1" Change Est' d Quantities From To 2,598 3,323 106 111 882 718 3 0 5 3 so 22 Difference 725 s 164 3 2 28 @ 21. 00/L. F. @ 138.00/V.F. Total Add: @ 42.0q/L.,F. @ 690.00/EACH @ 1,380.00/EACH @ 60.00/C.Y. 'f.otal Deduct: TOfAL ADD ~.GE~lD.l\ ITE~ f~~(N) -DISTRICT 3 15,225.00 690~00 15,915.00 6,888 .. 00 2,070 .. GO 2,760.00 1 i f,so. o·o 13,398.00 2,517.00 "L-1" COUNTY SANITATION Dl~)TJUCTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -. 103'1'1 LI.LIS AVLNUL: FOUNTAIN VAtLEY, CALIFOf,NIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. 4 ----~~-----~~------- ) NT RAC To R : __ s_u_1_1 _y-_r_, Ii_. l_l_c_r_· _co_1_1 t_r_n_c_t_i_n_~_c_o_n_11_w_n_y _____ _ DATE __ ~----F~c_h_r_u_ary ___ 3_, __ 1_9_76 _____ >i<'--- KNO'IT INTEHCEPTOR, HEACllES 5 AND 6, CONTH/\Cf NO. 3-20-1 THffi EXTENSION TI1c Contractor is hereby granted an extension of tirr1c for: 1. Inclement Weather 22 Calendar Days 2. Pipe Company strikes and late pipe delivery 70 Calendar Days TUf AL TIME EA'TENSION 92 Calendar ?ays SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this Olange Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date oard authorization date: · February .11, 1976 ¥----------~--------~----~~~--~--Consulting Engineer y-------------------~----------------Cont roe tor Octob.er 31, )974 365 Calendar Days October 31, 1975 92 Calendar Duys 9 2 Calendar Days 457 Calendar Days J anua.ry 31, 1976 Original Co~tract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD) ~~) Amended Contract Price Approved: $ 4,6021992.00 $ 855.87 -----~~~~-------- $ 2,517.00 ------~~~------~ $ 4,60(),364.87 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By ________________ ~~~----~----~ Chief Engineer "L-2" AGE~DA ITEM U9(N) -DISJ~ICT 3 "L-2" "M" RESOLUTION NO. 76-34-3 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-20-1 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-20-1 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * Tiie Board.of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. ·That the contractor, Sully-Miller Contracting Co., has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for KNOTT INTER- CEPTOR, REACHES 5 AND 6, CONTRACT NO. 3-20-1, on the 31st of January, 1976; ~.nd, Section 2. Tiiat by letter, Boyle Engineering Corporation, District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 and 6, Contract No. 3--20-1, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 31st day of October, 1974; and, Section S. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Sully-Miller Contracting Co., setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of said Knott Inter- , ccptor, Reaches 5 and 6, Contract No. 3-20-1, is hereby approved; and, Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 11, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #9Co) -DISTRICT 3 "M" "NII RESOLtrrION NO. 76-35-3 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REA01 27 AND REACHES 28 & 29, CONTRACT NO. 3-21-2 A RESOLUTION OF nm BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WESTSIDE RELIEF INTER- CEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 27 AND REACHES 28 AND 29, CONTRACT NO. 3-21-2 * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. Tiiat the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering Corporation, District's Engineers, for construction of WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 27 AND REACHES 28 AND 29 (FROM KATELLA & LEXINGTON DRIVE TO CRESCENT AVENUE), CONTRACT NO. 3-21-2, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. Tiiat said project is her~by approved and the Secretary be directed to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with the Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 3. Tiiat the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Heal th and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 4. Tiiat upon acquisition of the necessary right of way, the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time until which bids will be received and publicly opened and read; and, Section 5. Tiiat the Secretary of the Board and the District's Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 11, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #9(p) -DISTRICT 3 llN II "0-1" RESOLUTION NO. 76-35-3 AUTIIORJZING CONDEMNATION IN CONNECTION WITH CONTRACT NO. 3-21-2 A RESOLUTION OF TI1E BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 , OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CONDHfNATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY. SITUATED IN 'I11E COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RE: WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 2 7 AND REACHES 28. AND 29, CONTRACT NO. 3-21-2 * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 , of Orange County, California has found and determined, and hereby does find and determine, that the public interest and necessity required for public use the acquisition, construction, completion, operation and maintenance by said County Sanitation District of certain public improvements, to wit: A sanitary sewer and all facilities and appurtenances necessary or incidental thereto including manholes, measuring devices, pumping stations, and other structures for the transporting and receipt of sewage and industrial wastes for the purpose of transportation, treating and disposing of said sewage and industrial wastes arising within the teiritories of said County Sanitation District and such other territories as said District may have contracted to serve pursuant to law; and that certain real property situated in the County of Orange, State of California, is necessary therefor; and, Section 2. Th.at the real property, the acquisition of which is required by the public interest and necessity for the uses rand purposes set forth in Sect ion 1 hereof, is situated in the County of Orange, State of California, and is more particularly described on Schedule "A" and shown on maps marked Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as though set out in full herein; and, AGENDA ITEM #9(Q) -DISTRICT 3 "0-1" "0-2" Section 3. That the permanent easements and rights of way above described and necessary to be acquired sha 11 be acquired· subject to the rights of the m·mers, -~ their successors and assigns, to use the surface of the land within the boundary lines of such casements and rights of way to the extent compatible with the full and free exercise of said casements and rights of way; provided, however, that: (a) No building or structure of any kind shall be placed, erected or maintained thereon; (b) No streets, alleys nor.roadways shall be constructed upon, over, or along said easements and rights of way to a grade less than four feet above the top of any pipe or pipes located within the lines of said easements or rights of way; (c) No fill shall be placed or maintained over the surface of the ground as it shall exist within the lines of said casements and rights of way upon the completion of the improvements to be constructed therein greater than six feet in depth. Section 4. That the permanent easements and rights of way to be acquired shall include: (a) The right to construct manholes, air valves, blowoffs, pumping wells, pumping stations, metering stations, standpipe and service connection structures appurtenant to said line or lines of trunk sewer pipe, which structures shall not extend above the surface of the ground; (b) The right during construction to use all existing private roads within the properties of the owners for ingress to and egress from the work, together with the right, upon completion of the construction of the pipeline or pipelines or other works, to construct and maintain an access road upon, over, and along AGENDA ITEM #9(Q) -DISTRICT 3 "0-2" such permanent casements and rights of way as may be ·in the public interest from time to time. Section S. That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 , of Orange County, California, hereby declares its intention to acquire the property described in Section 2 hereof by proceedings in eminent domain. That the District's General Counsel be and he is hereby authorized and directed to commence an action in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Orange in the name and on behalf of County Sanitation District No. 3 , of Orange County, California, against all o~~ers and claimants of the above-described properties for the purpose of condemning and acquiring said properties for the use of said County Sanitation District; that said condemnation action shall be prosecuted in accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. That said attorney is authorized and instructed to make application to said Court for an order fixing the amount of security by way of money deposits as said Court may direct and for an order permitting County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, to take immediate possession and use of said real property for the uses and purposes herein described; and, Section 6. That the Auditor of the District is authorized upon receipt of a Court order and demand from the General Counsel of the District, to pay to the County Clerk of the County of Orange such swn or sums of money from District funds as may be required from time to time to be deposited upon order of the Court granting immediate possession of easements and rights of way to the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 11, 1976. ~ "0-3" AGENDA. ITEM #9(Q) -DISTRICT 3 II 0·-3" "P-1" SIMPSON -STEPPAT [ --•• -1 .....----~ , __ j.....___~ ..... ] 1· . ---~.] r~ .. :-· . .. --~-~~ r==:i L==-.--:.J CONSUL TINO CIVIL ENGINEERS February 4, 1976 County Sanitation District No. 5 P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Ca. 92708 Attention: Mr. Ray E. Lewis Gentlemen: In accordance with your request we hereby submit this proposal for providing civil engineering services in connection with the proposed Backbay trunk sewer. The scope of our services would include the following: 1. Hold conferences with District staff and other interested agencies and private property owners who may be involved with the project. 2. Provide aerial topographic maps and design surveys. 3. Assist in the obtaining of permits from governmental agencies such as the City of Ne1~ort Beach, Coastal Commission, etc. 4. Prepare construction drawings and specifications to District's requirements. 5. Provide the Engineer's estimate of quantities and construction costs. 6. Prepare legal descriptions and maps for right-of-way acquisition as required and assist in the procurement of title reports if necessary. 7. Assist the District's appraiser and attorney in any right-of-way matters connected with the project. 8. Assist the District in securing and tabulating bids, analyzing bid results and submit a recommendation on the award of co~struction contracts. 9. Check shop drawings and working drawings submitted by the Contractor. NEWPORT CENTER 358 SHn M1yuol Or·1ve. Suite 200 AGEf\'DA ITEM #9 ( S) DISTRICT 5 Newport.. lle11ch. CE1liforn10 92660 -Ii ,· -"P-1" ( 7 1 4) 644-0563 "P-2" Mr. Ray E. Lewis February 4, 1976 Page 2 10. Furnish consultation and advice to the District during construction. 11. Make a final inspection and submit a report on the completed project. 12. Prepare as-built drawings of the completed work and file the original drawings with the District, 13. Provide construction staking as requested by the District. 14. Make arrangements for and coordinate soil investigations as required. It is understood that the original drawings for the project shall become the property of the District. Our fee for Items 1 through 12 of the above scop~ of work would be a lump sum of $34,000. Item 13, construction surveys, would be provided as required by the District at our standard hourly rates of $50.00 per hour for a two-man crew and $68.00 per hour for a three-man crew. If soils investigations are required, we would retain a soils engineer approved by the District and the cost of these services would be invoiced at cost. We would propose that progress payments of the lump sum fee be as follows: 1. Completion of topographic mapping 2. Submittal of completed construction plans and specifications 3. Award of construction contract 4. Acceptance of completed project 20% 50% 80% 100% If for one reason or another a construction contract is not awarded within six months after the final plans and specifications have been submitted to the District, then we would expect to be paid 90% of the lump sum fee. The cost of construction staking and other outside services such as soils engineering would be invoiced monthly. It is estimated that the completed plans and specifications would be ready for submittal to the District wici1in four months after receipt of authorization to proceed. I ' ~: AGENDA ITEM #9(s) -DISTRICT 5 "P-2" "P-3" Mr. Ray E. Lewis February 4, 1976 Page 3 Thank you for the opportunity of submitting this proposal. Very truly yours, SIMPSON-STEPPAT / () ~ . I /_-. /,. -. /f. ·-:-;> . 4 :· /--., /' ? ;;./'"\-_,;-?,,). .--· '-../ ._/ . , t -{./ '-y-_ . / ./ . (... Donald C. Simpson DCS/klc r £:C3 I I I ~ AGENDA ITEM #9Cs) -DISTRICT 5 "P-3" II Q" RESOLUfION NO. 76-37-7 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR TUSTIN- ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, PORTION OF REACH 14 AND REACHES 15 & 16, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-9 A RESOLUTION OF nm BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, PORTION OF REACH 14 AND REACHES 15 AND 16, CONTRACT NO. 7-6~9 * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. 'That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering Corporation, District's Engineers, for construction of TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, PORTION OF REACH 14 AND REACHES 15 AND 16, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-9, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That said project is hereby approved and the Secretary be directed to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with the Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Heal th and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 4. Tilat said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m., March 30, 1976, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors . • PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 11, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #9(r) -DISTRICT ,7 "Q" II R" Shelton & Associates land Surveyors & Engineers (714) 842-4100 P.O. aox 2377 1793! BEACH BLVD., HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIF. 92647 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: January 30, 1976 We propose the following engineering services for the Preparation of Document Maps for Sanitation District No. 7. 1. Preparation of maps on 28 x 41 inch mylar with a one inch border on three sides and ample room on the bottom for a signature block to be selected by the District. Actual mapping grid will be ZS-inches or 15,000 feet and 38.33 inches or 23,000 feet. The north arrows shall be to the left of the map. The above figures are based on a square of one-inch equals 600 feet. 2. Search the records of the County of Orange for pertinent documents that the District will assist in acquiring. The District will make any records available which may be on file at the District's office. 3. Index each document and prepare a master listing in addition to a card file listing of each document so searched by number, granter, recording reference, date and other pertinent data. 4. E~ch document to be referenced and plotted on the map with the document reference shown. S. Documents are to be filed in folders and transmitted to District. Our fee schedule for the above engineering is $18.50 per man hour and we estimate this project will take 515 man hours for a lump sum not to exceed $9,527.50. Thank you for your consideration. GKS:vc Vf ey rul:Y /01;/, /t.~;I<'#;~ G· ~-Shelton Contdlting Engineer #157 AGENDA ITEM #9Cu) -DISTRICT 7 II R" II S~' Eugene St Amand 20202 Ama~ola ~trent Orunge Park Acres January 14, 1976 ··Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.? of Orange County. Dear Sirs: Please accept this as a request to annex my property to Sanitation District lfo. 7. Owners: Eugene E St Amand and Joyce M. St Amand, J.T. 20§g~ ~~g501a Street, Orange Park Acres. Assesed Value •.• $8JJO Improve~ents... 8000 4il6JJO \ \ ST ::1}2.,•/ • ;;l.Z4CJ} ·s~s._r• -.,~~J:JL_~. to?~~.2 I 1 fr Pf\RCE l -;11 I \ \ .\ LOT '?8 \.38 ACRES I._·---2.32..,..,._7 --'~-1 I Legal Description Se Corner L98 Tll 918 MB 28 lUhl-4J MMoc Records N 89° 59' 40" W 2)2 17' N16°t~l 59" W 2)6 .41 S 89° .59' 40" E JJO 12 to PT in NE Line of said lot 98 so 0 0' 20" ti 226.4J' to Yr of Ucginning Sincerely Z-y·.v 4-!Zlnv,J Eugene St Amand AGENDA ITEM f9(v) -DISTRICT 7 II s II "T" RESOLUTION NO. 76-40-11 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR MANllOI.E REPLACEMENT AND HEPAIR, CONTRACT NO. 11-lR-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR MANHOLE REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR, CONTRACT NO. 11-lR-1 * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No; 11 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by the District's engineers, for construction of MANHOLE REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR, CONTRACT NO. 11-lR-1, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m., MarcQ. 2, 1976, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 11, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #9Cx) -DISTRICT 11 "T" "U-1" RESOLUTION NO. 76-32 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 75-168, RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATIVE TO CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 75-168 RELATIVE TO CONDITIONS OF · EMPLOYMENT * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 9 of Resolution No. 75-168 is hereby amended to provide for disciplinary procedures as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; and, Section 2. Resolution No. 75-168 is hereby amended by adding Section thereto, to provide for an employee layoff procedure as specified in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 11, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #12(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "U-1" "U-2" EXHIBIT "A" DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS The General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to exercise supervision over all employees and to impose disciplinary actions, for just cause, upon any person employed under the provisions of the personnel and salary resolutions. Disciplinary action to be imposed, if any, shall be that which, if in the judgment of the General Manager, appears to be in the best interest of the Districts. 'Ibe General Manager shall have the authority to: Terminate the employee; or Suspend the employee, without pay, for a period of time not to exceed thirty (30) working d~ys; or Defer consideration of the employee's annual anniversary merit review for a period of up to one year; and/or Adjust the employee's salary to that representing a lower step rate within the heretofore-established salary range of the employee's assigned position classification; and/or Reclassify the employee ·by demotion to a position classification for which a lesser salary range has heretofore been established, in which case the employee may be assigned a salary representing any step rate within said lower position classification as deemed appropriate under the circumstances by the General Manager. AGENDA ITEM #12(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "U-2" STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 STEP 6 II Li-3" EXHIBIT "B" LAYOFF PROCEDURE Determination of the need for layoff will be made by the Districts. Work groups and position classifications will be determined by the Districts. Number of employees to be laid off will be determined by the Districts. Department Head of work group affected will recommend to the Personnel Review Committee employees to be laid off based upon performance, demonstrated competency as evidenced by past Performance Review and Action Notices (PRAN's), length of service, and the requirements of the Districts. Performance and competency being determined equal among employees in a position classification selected for layoff, an employee· with the least amount of full-time continuous service with the Districts will be laid off first, and thereafter, in order of length of service with the Districts. Personnel Review Committee will recommend to the General Manager the employees to be laid off. The General Manager's action to lay off employees will be final. Employees to be laid off will be so informed in writing at least two weeks prior to the date of said layoff. Such notification will include "bump down" options. In the event employee has designated a recognized representative for purposes of employer-employee relations, said representative will receive a copy of the notification of layoff. "Bump down" -An employee selected for layoff may "bump down" into a classification in his work group for which he is qualified (qualification is presumed where the person has held the position previously with the District or where the position is in the regular promotional line). An employee who is selected for layoff and who has not completed the new- hire probation period is not eligible for a "bump down" option. An employee informed of his impending layoff or "bump down" must inform his Department Head within five calendar days of his intent to take the option of the layoff or the "bump down". The process will be repeated at the next lower position classification level within the group where an employee "bumps down". The salary for an employee that has "bumped down" shall be established at the same rate of pay for which said employee had been assigned in the higher classification provided, however, that (a) in the event the exact same rate of pay is not set forth in the salary range assigned to the position classification to which the employee has "bumped", then the employee's rate of pay shall be established as the next lower rate of pay in the new position classification range; and (b) in no event shall the employee receive a salary that exceeds Step 5 of the new position classification to which he has "brnnpcd". AGENDA ITEM #12CA) -ALL DISTRICTS "U-3" STEP 7 NOTICES "U-4" EXHIBIT "B" Employees that have been laid off shall be placed on a rehire eligibility list for their respective work group. The employee most recently laid off shall be placed at the top of the list and thereafter, in descending order by date of layoff. Employees' names shall be maintained on the eligibility'-"" list for a period of two years from date of separation. In the event the Districts conunence hiring for positions from which employees have been previously laid off, all employees on the rehire cligibili ty list shall be so notified. Employees responding to said notification within 10 calendar days will be eligiblci for re-employment in position classification openings in the work group for which they have previously been laid off, in order of the rehire eligibility listing. In the event openings occur in other work groups, the employee may apply for said openings and will be considered without priority rating along with other applicants. Employees who do not respond within 10 calendar days of the date said notification was mailed by the Districts will automatically have their names removed from the rehire eligibility listing. All notices and responses shall be in writing, certified mail, return receipt requested, to the last address of record, or delivered in person, for which written acknowledgment must be made. Responses to the Districts should be addressed to P. O. Box 8127, Fountain Valley, CA 92708. AGENDA ITEM #12(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "U-4" "V-1" PEAT. MARWICK. MITCHELL & Co. CEHTIF'JED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 000 NEWPORT CENTER DfllVE NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 02660 January 20, 1976 The Executive Conrrnittee County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Dear Members of the Executive Connnittee: We have completed our initial engagement as auditors for the June 30, 1975 examination of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. With the experience of the initial examination of the Districts behind us, we have carefully analyzed the time expended by our professional audit staff and management to successfully complete the examination. We would like to briefly highlight the 1975 examination and present our proposal for the 1976 examination and multi year examinations. 1975 EXAMINATION On June 26, 1975 we completed our interim examination of the financial records of the Districts for 1975 and reported formally to the Joint Board of Directors several conditions which we believed to be weaknesses which warranted the Boards attention. The nature of our letter was orally presented to the full Board at the July 9, 1975 Board meeting. It was further referred to the Execu- tive Counnittee on July 24, 1975 where Mike Harrison, engagement supervisor, discussed the comments further with the members of the executive committee and Mr. Woodruff of Counsel. We completed our 1975 audit work of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County on September 25, 1975. On November 5, 1975 each of the directors of the joi~boards received directly from us a copy of the financial statements and accountants report thereon. On December 22, 1975 we again formally reported to the Board of Directors on the status of our June 26, 1975 recommendations. During the entire 1975 examination of the Districts our staff and management worked closely with the Director of Finance and staff of the Districts in an independent professional manner. Our initial investment in the 1975 examina- tion was substantial and included 1,109 professional staff and manasement hours plus expenses. This was more than we originally anticipated, but was necessary, in our opinion, to complete the engagement in a professional and complete manner. AGENDA ITEM #12CB) -ALL DISTRICTS "V-1" P. M.M.St CO. "V-2" The Executive Committee County Sanitation Districts of Orange County January 20, 1976 2 The fee which we contracted for was $10,000, which included expenses and has since been paid. This represents an average cost to you of approximately $9.00 per professional hour and an investment by us for the initial year of approximately $17,000. It should be noted that our examination covered ten separate sets of financial records (the records of the eight districts, joint operating and joint capital outlay records). A significant portion of audit time was expended in examination of the Districts' capital assets. For the fiscal year ending June 30, 1975 outlays for capital assets rose to nearly thirty million dollars, an increase of approximately 83% over the previous fiscal year. PROPOSAL FOR 1976 EXAMINATION Based on our initial engagement and a complete review of the hours, we propose to perform the June 30, 1976 examination of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County for an annual maximum fee not to exceed $14,000, including expenses, except if PMMS:Co. found it necessary to do additional work or expend inordinate amounts of time due to some unforeseen problem. Upon reasonable demonstration of the existence of such a situation, we would report such conditions to the Executive Connnittee of the Board of Directors before pro- ceeding. We anticipate the examination will require 800 hours to complete and prepare the report. We would progress bill our services as incurred at the hourly rates set forth in our contract letter of February 28, 1975. In order to provide service on an ongoing basis which would be beneficial to both the Districts and our Firm, PMMS:Co. would perform the examination for the years ending June 30, 1977 and 1978 ~t the same proposed maximum fee of $14,000s subject to adjustment for future years for national cost of living increases as set forth in the annual Consumer Price Index contained in the Monthly Labor Review published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United ~tates Department of Labor. The adjustment for the 1977 and 1978 examinations would be based upon the calendar year index for all items in the Los Angeles area beginning with increases as established during calendar year 1976. * * * * * * We are looking forward to meeting with the Executive Committee on Tuesday, January 27, 1976 to discuss further any questions the members may have per- taining to our proposal. Very truly yours, AGENDA ITEM #12(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "V-2" "W-1" RESOLUTION NO. 76-33-1 FIXING COMPENSATION FOR DIRECTORS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FIXING COMPEN- SATION FOR ITS DIRECTORS AND RESCINDING RESOLUTIONS NOS. 63-128 AND 68-3-1 REGARDING COMPENSATION * * * * * * * * * * * \\11EREAS, Section 4 733. 5 of the Health and Safety Code provides that where two or more County Sanitation Districts have joined in purchase, ownership, use, construction, or operation of a sewerage system and said Districts hold their meetings jointly, and one or more of the Directors serve as a Director on more than one of such Districts meeting jointly, the Districts may, by joint reso- lution approved by each District, limit the compensation of such a Director for attending said jointly-held meetings; and, WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, have heretofore executed a Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, dated July 1, 1970, as amended; and, WHEREAS, said Districts hold their regular monthly meetings jointly; NOW, ~THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That each Director shall receive the sum of $50.00 for attend- ance at any meeting of the Board of Directors of this District, provided that he shall not receive more than the sum of $100.00 per month as such compensation from this District; and, Section 2. That not withstanding the provisions of Section 1, when a Director of this District is also a Director of another District, said Director shall be paid not more than a total of $50.00 for any jointly-held meeting attended by him when such other District, or Di$tricts, has, or have, adopted a resolution substantially similar to this one, as is permitted under the provisions of Section 4733.5 of the Health and Safety Code; and, AGENDA ITEM #12(c) -DISTRICT 1 "W-1" "W-2" Section 3. Section 2 of this resolution shall not apply to the Director serving as Joint Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. Th.e Director serving as Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall receive the sum of $50.00 from each District which he presides over in a jointly held meeting, as authorized by Section 4733 of the Health and Safety Code; provided, however, that the Joint Chairman shall not be paid more than $50.00 by any District for any meeting; and, Section 4. Th.at each Director shall receive the sum of eleven cents (11¢) per mile for each mile, or part of a mile, actually traveled on business of this District. 11rnt when traveling on the business of more than one District, such Director shall receive no more than said eleven cents (11¢) per mile, or part of a mile, so traveled, whether on the business of one District or several Districts; and, Section 5. Th.at each District meeting jointly shall bear an equal portion of said compensation and mileage expense; and, Section 6. Th.at Resolutions Nos. 63-128 and 68-3-1 concerning compensation of Directors, are hereby rescinded and made of no further effect; and, Section 7. That this resolution shall become effective and, Section 8. That all actions of this District, whether by resolution, motion o:r otherwise, inconsistent herewith or contrary to the terms hereof, be and they are hereby amended to conform to the terms of this resolution. AGENDA ITEM #12(c) -DISTRICT 1 "W-2" "X-1" RESOLUTION NO. ESTABLISHING COMPENS!\TION AND REIMBURSEMENT 1-'oi~EXl'ENSBS r'OR Di irnc'f6fis A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANI'fA'rION DIS'l'RICT NO. OF OHl\NGE COUNTY, CALI FORNI!\, 8S'rM3LISHING THE COMPENSA'l'IOi'l AND EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT POLICIES FOR ITS DIRECTORS, AND REPE!\LING RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, Section 4733 of the Health and Safety Code provides that the District Board has the power to fix the amount of compensa- tion per meeting to be paid each member of the Board or for each day's service rendered as a member by request of the Board; and WHEREAS, Section 4733.5 of the Health and Safety Code provides that where two or more County Sanitation Districts have joined in the purchase, ownership, use, construction or operation of a sewerage system and said Districts hold their meetings jointly, and one or more of the Directors serve as a Director on more than one of such Districts meeting jointly, the Districts may, by resolution approved by each District, limit the.compensation of such a Director for attending said jointly held meetings; and WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, have heretofore executed a Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, dated July 1, 1~70, as amended; and WHEREAS, Section 4734 of the Health and Safety Code provides that where two or more County Sanitation Districts have joined in the administration and operation of the respective Districts and hold their meetings ·jointly and such meetings ar~ presided over by a Director of one of the Districts acting as Joint Chairman for and on behalf of the joint organization, each District so participating may pay the Joint Chairman the same compensation as a Director of such District is paid; and AGENDA ITEM #12Cc) -DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,&7 "X-1" WHEREAS, said Districts hold their regular monthly meetings jointly. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That each Director shall receive the sum of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) for attendance at each meeting of the Board of Directors or for each day's service rendered as a member of th~ Board by request of the Board, provided that he shall not receive more than the sum of Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) per month as such compensation from this District. Each day's service rendered as a member of the District Board shall be deemed to includ~, but not be limited to, attendance: (a) as a member of the Executive Committee of the Joint Administrative Organization; (b) as a meml>~r of any committee appointed by the Chairman of the Joint ~dministrative Organization or the Chairman of the District which has established the committee; (c) when expressly invited to attend the Executive Committee meetings by the Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization; (d) conferences with State and/or Federal legislators regarding Joint Administrative Organization business when approved by action of the Joint Boards; or (e) attendance at conferences for business of the Joint Administrative Organization or the District when approved by action of the Joint Boards or the District Board. Section 2. If a Director represents two or more Districts, the payment to the Director for attendance at meetings or for each day's service shall be shpred equally with each District repre- sented by the Director. Section·3. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 1, when a Director of this District is also a Director of unother District, said Director shall be paid not more than a total of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) per day for attendance at uny jojntly held meeting of said Districts or each day's services rendered AGENDA ITEM #12(c) -DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,&7 "X-2" "X-3" concurrently to said Districts by the Director when such other District, or Districts, has, or have, adopted a resolution substantially similar to this one, as is permitted under the provisions of Section 4733.5 of the Health and Safety Code. Section 4. Section 3 of this resolution shall not apply to the Director serving as Joint Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. The Director serving as Chairman of the Joint Admin- istrative Organization shall receive the sum of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) from each District which he presides over in a jointly held meeting of the Joint Administrative Organization, as author- ized by Section 4734 of the Health and Safety Code; provided, however, that the Joint Chairman shall not be paid more than Fifty Dollars ($50.00) by any District for any meeting •. Section 5. The Director serving as Chairman or Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall receive the sum of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) from the District which he represents and no other District when attending a meeting of his District or other Districts or Executive Committee or other Committee assignments approved by the Joint Boards, or when attending to special service rendered as a Director by request of the Joint Boards. Section 6. Each Director shall receive the sum of Fifteen Cents {$.15) per mile for each mile up to and including 150 miles, ·Twelve Cents {$.12) per mile for each mile over 150 miles up to and including 600 miles, and Six Cents ($.06) per mile for all miles in excess of 600 miles, actually traveled on business of the District per month. When traveling on the business of more thar1 one District, such Director shall receive no more than said mileage, whether on the business of one or several Districts. Section 7. When tr av el ing on the business of one or more. Districts, the Director shall be entitled to reimbursement of expenses necessarily incurred in the.course of said tr~vel in nccordance with the following schedule: AGENDA ITEM #12(c) -DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,5,&7 II x-3". ·' "X-4" Commercial Tronsportation -per actual invoice Hotel -room rate per actual statement for occupancy Registration -actual cost of conference or meeting registration fee Ground Transportation -as itemized Telephone Service -as itemized Meals, Gratuities and Incidentals -$20.00 per day. In those cases where the actual cost of the Director's personal meals and incidentals required during the course of the conference or meeting exceeds the per diem, reimbursement will be based upon actual expenditures. Section 8. No Director shall receive pny for attendance at any meeting, such as Executive Committee or other committees, which is scheduled immediately preceding, immediately succeeding, or con- current with a regularly scheduled District or joint meeting of the District. Section 9. Resolution No. concerning compensation for Directors is hereby repealed and made of no further force or effect. Section 10. This resolution shall become effective 1976. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a· regular meeting held 1976. AGENDA ITEM #12(c) -DISTRICTS 1,2,1,5,6,&7 II X-L~ II "Y" Staff Report on CONSIDERATION OF THE TRANSFER OF THE 12 KV, 3-PllASE POWER Lnm BETWEEN PLANT NO. 1 AND PLANT NO. 2 '£0 SOUTHEHN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2-4-76 In November, 1969, the Boards entered into an agreement with the Edison Company wherein the Districts and Edison utilized a joint pole line for power transmission, on District property and casements, be- tween Garfield Avenue and the Coast Hir,hway under conditions prescribed by the Boards. At the present time, the Districts have one power source from the Edison Company for all power utilized by the joint works. Power for Plant No. 1 is transmitted via the District owned 12 KV, 3-phase line on the aforementioned joint pole system between the two plants. This sinr;le power source for both.plants has saved the Districts approximately $24,ooo per year because of Edison's rate structure. However, on occasion, this has not provided the r~liability necessary for operations and a single source of power is contrary to State and EPA regulations on reliability of electrical energy for municipally operated treatment facilities. When the 50 MGD activated sludge addition at Plant No. 1 is on line this 12 K.V system will be inadequate to serve our facilities at Fountain Valley from Plant No. 2. We evaluated the use of this line for standby or emergency service during the design sta~e of the Plant No. 1 project and determined that an expenditure of $200,000 would be required for switching equipment and reconnection of existing circuits at Plants Nos. 1 and 2. Therefore, provisions were made as a part of the $30 million construction project (P1~16) to provide for separate service at Plant No. 1. Edison Company personnel have advised that they can incorporate our existing power line into their system and provide alternate erne~gency sources to the two treatment facilities without additional cost to the Districts for equipment or the standby charges usually associated with this kind of service. Their plan will allow the Districts to remain on the present A-7 po~er rate cchedule at both plants for an estimated savings of $24,000 per year, until such time as the power requirements exceed 5,000 KW demand at one of the plants. We estimate that this will occur sometime in 1979. Since this line, which was constructed j_n 1961 for $33,985, will not serve the Districts' needs without costly additions and modifications, it is surplus and, as such, its value is determined to be that which could be obtained as salvage for used wire, poles, and crossarms. This is estimated to be $11,500. The Edison Company has offered to purchase this line from the Districts for our established salvage value. We obtained quotations for the used wire from two salvage companies. Each quoted 114¢ per pound, which is the going price for copper, delivered to their facility. TM.s equates to $10,127. There is no market for the 35-foot poles which are now 15 years old. It is recommended that the Boards declare their intent to transfer ownership of the Districts' power line between the two plants to the Edison Company for a cash consideration of $11,500 with the conditions that the transfer would be made in accordance with the Districts' needs and that Edison would provide the alternate emergency sources to feed the two treatment plants ~s proposed. It is also recommended that the appropriate ngreement be prepared in a form acceptable to the General Counsel and brought back to the Boards for their consideration. AGENDA ITEM #13 -ALL DISTqrcTS "Y" "Z-l 11 RESOLUTION NO. 76-31-1 FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS -1975-76 JOINT ·woRKS IMPROVEMENTS AND ADDITIONS A RESOLUTION OF 11iE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C., 466 ET SEQ., AND STATE GRANT UNDER CLEAN \\'ATER BOND LAW OF 1970, IN BEHALF OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, AND PROVIDING CERTAIN ASSURANCES * * * * * * * * * * * 1be Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT: Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 466 et seq.) provides for Federal grants for con- struction of sewage treatment works. Section 2. 1be State Clean Water Bond Law of 1970 authorizes the State Water Resources Control Board to enter into contracts with public agencies for State Grants for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 3. County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division S of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other local collection sewering agencies, and has joined with other County Sanitation Districts; namely, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, in constructing, operating and maintaining joint sewage treat- ment plants and disposal facilities under an agreement dated July 1, 1970, as amended, known as the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement. Section 4. In accordance with the terms of said Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, acts for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AGENDA ITEM #14 -ALL DISTRICTS "Z-1" "Z-2" and 11, of Orange County, California, each organized for similar purposes and serving different territories, all in Orange County, California, for the purpose of constructing and operating said joint sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities. Section 5. By means of this resolution and of the resolutions set forth below by number, the following County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, have authorized the filing of applications for grants under said Act of Congress and said Clean Water Bond Law and have authorized County Sanitation District No. 1 to file said application in their behalf. District No. Resolution No. 2 76-25-2 3 76-26-3 5 76-27-5 6 76-28-6 7 76-29-7 11 76-30-11 1 76-31-1 Section 6. Fred A. Harper, General Manager, is hereby authorized and directed to sign and file for and on behalf of County Sanitation District No. 1, for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, Application for Federal Grant for Sewage Treatment Works Under 33 U.S.C. 466 et sc.q. and any agreements or other documents necessary to secure and receive such grant and a State Grant for Clean Water under the Clean Water Bond Law of 1970, for a joint project generally described as follows: 1975-76 Joint Works Improvements and Additions Section 7. District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7, and 11, hereby agrees and further does authorize the aforementioned Representative to.certify that if a Federal grant for its project is made pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. i171 et seq.), it will pay the remaining cost of the approved AGENDA ITEM #14 -ALL DISTRICTS "Z-·2" "Z-3" project; it will provide proper and efficient operation and maintenance of the approved project after completion of construction thereof; it will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (F.L. 88-352) and the regulations issued pursuant thereto and state that the Assurance of Compliance with such Regulation attached to the Application for Federal Grant applies to this project; and it will comply with requirements of Executive Order 11246 pertaining to equal employment opportunity in Federally-assisted construction contracts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 11, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #14 -ALL DISTRICTS "Z-3 II AA II 2-4-76 Staff Report on Purchase of Used Long Bed La.the Included in the Districts' equipment budget for the current fiscal year (1975-76) is $19,080 for the purchase of a used long bed lathe to be used in our maintenance shops for repair and modification of drive lines, piping, pump shafts, etc. In our search through the used machinery dealers over the past few months a number of suitable lathes have been located. Those listed below are indicative of the available supply and their comparative values (although two of the units ha.ve been sold at this writing). Description Lodge & Shipley 27" x 24' Putnam 46" x 38' (sold) Monarch 27" x 20' (Oakland) American 24" x 20 1 (sold) Lodge & Shipley 25" x 18' Vendor Thomas J. Rush Company 5632 Burlingame Ave. Buena Park 90621 (714-523-3573) Liles Machinery Sales 2657 E. Slauson Ave. Huntington Park 90255 (213-589-3701) Barker Machinery Co. 6921 So. Santa Fe Huntington Park 90255 (213-588-3205l (415-569-0304 Camras Company 2066 So. Sarita Fe Los Angeles 90021 (213-588-1211) Faz co 2509 East 55th Street Huntington Park 90255 (213-589-8171) Price $ 9,795.46 $14,ooo.oo $18,950.00 $17,950.00 $27,500.00 We believe the Lodge & Shipley 27 11 x 24' lathe offered by the Thomas J. Rush Company for $9,795-46 to be a good value for the Districts. Our mechanical supervisor has inspected the unit and our machinist has test-run it and find it to be in good mechanical condition. It is therefore recommended that a~thority to purchase the Lod(Se & Shipley 27" x 24' lathe from the Thomas J. Rush Company for the total price of $9,795·1-~6, including tax and delivery to our shop, be obtained at the February 11, 1976 Joint Board meeting. 7)J Jn e Jt-:.~ w. N. Clarke AGENDA ITEM #15 -ALL DISTRICTS II AA II "BB" Janua t·y 6, 1976 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 5 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Gentlemen: Request Terms and Conditions for Annexation to OCSD #5 659LCC1/76 We have retained Willdan Associates, an engineering consultant, to prepare a study of alternotive methods of waste water disposal for The Irvine Company's coastal area between Newport Beach and Laguna Beach. A portion of this study area has been included in the Orange County Sanitation District No. 5 reports of November 1969 and December 1971 prepared by the District Engineer. The area considered at this time is approximately that area designated as Number 1 in the District's December 1971 Master Plan Revision. IRWD requests the conditions for annexation of the study area to OCSD #5 including political, financial and engineering, to be identified. We will be pleased to provide additional information regarding proposed population an- ticipated sewage flows, boundaries of service area, etc. as i~equested. Tha.nk you for your consideration of this request. Very truly yours, . I) ./ /fuil&¢AJ--~o/Coffelt · Director Engineering & Planning Irvine Ranch Water District AGENDA ITEM #28(A) -DISTRICT 5 "BB II ORDINANCE NO. 509 AN ORDINANCE OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. SOS, AS AMENDED, AND ORDINANCE NO. 508, PERTAINING TO CONNECTION CHARGES The Board of Directors of Cotmty Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1: Section (a) of Article 6 of Ordinance No. 505, as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows: "(a) District Connection Charges. Before any connection permit shall be issued, the applicant shall pay to the District, or its agent, the charges specified herein. (1) Connection Charge for New Construction, Family Dwelling Buildings. For each new family dwelling bul.lding constructed, the connection charge shall be $250 per dwelling unit. (2) Connection Charge for New Construction, Other Than Family Dwelling Buildings. For all other new construction, including but not limited to commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the connection charge shall be $130 per 1000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $130. (3) Connection Charge for Replacement Buildings. For new construction ·replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in P~ragraphs (1) and (2) hercinabove. If such replacement construction is conunenced within two years after demolition or d~struction of the forrner building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed, calculated on the basis of the current connection charge applicable for the new construction "CC-1" AGENDA ITEM #29 -DISTRICT 5 "CC-1" of the building demolished or destroyed. In no case shall such credit exceed the connection charge. (4) Connection Charges for Additions to or Alterations of Existing Buildings. In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of family dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than family dwelling buildings, the connection charge shall be $250 for each (h-Jelling unit added or created and in the case of new construction other than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $130 per 1000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such construction shall be $130. When Charge is to be Paid. Payment of connection charges shall be required at the time of issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the requirement of obtaining a building permit in the City of Newport Beach. The payment of the sewer connection charge for such buildings will be required at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within the territorial limits of the District. Schedule of Charges. A schedule of charges specified herein will be on file in the office of the Secretary of the District and in the Building Department of the City of Newport Beach." Section 2. Section 1 herein shall become effective thirty (30) days following adoption of this ordinance. "CC-2" AGENDA ITEM #29 -DISTRICT 5 "CC-2" "CC-3" Section. 3. Section 402 of Ordinance No. 508 is hereby amended to read: "402. DISTRICT NO. 5 CONNECTION CHARGES 1. District Connection Charges Before any connection pcrmi t shall be issued, the applicant shall pay to the District, or its agent, the charges specified herein. (a) Connection charges for new construction, family dwelling buildings. For each new family dwelling building constructed, the connection charge shall be $250 per dwelling unit. (b) Connection charge for new construction, other than family dwelling buildings. For all other new construction, including but not limited to commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the connection charges shall be $130 per 1000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $130. (c) Connection charge for replacement buildings. For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in· paragraphs (a) and (b) above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two years after dcmoli ti on or destruction of the former bui I ding, a credit against such charge shall be allowed, calculated on the basis of the current connection charge applicable for the new construction of the building demolished or destroyed. In no case shall such credit exceed the connection charge. AGENDA ITEM #29 -DISTRICT 5 "CC-3" (d) Connection charges for additions to or alterations of existing buildings. In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of family dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than family dwelling buildings, the connection charge shall be $250 for each dwelling unit added or created and in the case of new construction other than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $130 per 1000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construction provided that new construction shall contain additional fixture units. (e) Payment of connection charges. Payment of connection charges shall be required at the time of issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, excepting in the case of a building permit in the City of Newport Beach. The payment of the sewer connection charge for such buildings will be required at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within the territorial linats of the District. (f) Schedule of charges. A schedule. of charges specified herein will be on file in the office of the Secretary of the District and in the Building Department of the City of Newport Beach." Section 4. 1110 Secretary of the Board is directed to certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to ·be published in a newspaper of general circulation ~ within the County. TI1is ordinance shall take effect ·thirty d:iys after its adoption. "CC-4" AGENDA ITEM #29 -DISTRICT 5 "CC-4" LAW OFFICES RICHARD O. f"RAZEE ~ STEPHEN C. !:.TEWART THOMAS L. WOODRUF"f" JEF"f"REY A. HARTMAN 1055 NORTH MAIN STREET, SUITE 1020 SANTA ANA, CALI FOR NIA 92701 ARE:A CODE 71"4 835 -6212 "DD" January 21, 1976 Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P. o. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Re: Orange Park Acres Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 Dear Mr. Harper: I have been advised that the Directors of the Orange Park Acres Homeowners Association have recently submitted to your office a revised annexation and improvement plan for their properties. Specifically, the request now appears to seek to annex to County Sanitation District No. 7 and not install any portion of the main/trunk sewer system at this time. It is my opinion that there is no legal basis under the County Sanitation District Act, the Improvement District Acts or the District Reorganization Act to establish an improvement dis- trict solely to pay foi the annexation fees that would be paid to District No. 7. The provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 4806 clearly intend that improvements must be installed when issuing bonds and annexation fees alone would not qualify. District No. 7 could require the payment or security for the future payment of annexation fees to be posted with the District prior to final action upon the annexation. 'l"'LW: ab l-A-2 truly yours, Tho:: f(dj;~fr General Counsel AGENDA ITEM #32(A) -DISTRICT 7 II DD" ERNCS1. A. Wll,.llON KCNNCT ... I. JON CS JAMl!:S T. MORTON JO ... N C. LYNCH (19!>8•1971) PHILIP D "'SSA,. ""NDRCW C HALL, JR. OCR""LD A LASTER J£ .. CMIAH J. LYNCH MICHAEL A. N""VE JAMES L. CO Pl!: LANO SHARON S. WHITE w·n.soN, ,JQNJ~s. MoHTON & J. .. YNCII ATTORNEYS ANO COUNSELLORS AT LAW 630 NORTH SAN MATEO DRIVE' CHAstLrs H. MIRKllRIOI[ 1e••·••11 KIRKBRIOC & GORDON (JOSCPH B, GOSIOON) P.O. BOX 152 .......,, PEOOY L. M•r'.LLIOOTT ROl51!.RT J. HILL THOMAS C. MORONEY YMOMAS It. ""C>AMS SM£RR00 9 DAVIS LAWRENCE C. JCNSEN MAY CR ""·DANIEL JOAN E. DRIOO" PAUL C WILJl\IN5 THOMAS !>.OWEN RODCRT 0 ... uweRCY ROY J. t<.OEOEN SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA 94401 [•us] 342-3S23 181'9•19'47' KIRK8A1oc,w1'-SON. t-414.RZ~Cl.D .. WALLACE January 28, 1976 0,. COUN!ICL AATHUA ..J, HAAZ,.Cl.0 A. A. ""'PLAN (MO. ONLY) Honorable Board of Directors Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Re: Proposal for Concurrent Annexation and Bond Authorization -Orange Park Acres Gentlemen: On behalf of the residents and property owners of the Orange Park Acres area and the Orange Park Association, Inc., the following is the general proposal now being made in connection with the annexation. Following extensive investigation and discussion, the concept which is proposed to be followed is generally as follows: 1. Concurrently with the annexation procedures, following original proposal, it would be submitted to the voters as a condition of annexa- tion the approval of general obligation borrds covering the following: "EE-1" a) The sum of money necessary to acquire appropriate rights of service and use in the existing treatment and outfall facilities equal to the appropriate annexation charge. b) The payment of a sum necessary to provide major trunks necessary to serve the area within the boundaries, the costs to be adjusted to reflect an off set of any territory within the boundaries of District No. 7 which abuts and would be served by any part of that system, i.e., property north of Chapman Avenue and immediately east of proposed Reach 18 of District No. 7 master plan. c) The reimbursement of advances made by certain property owners within the area of costs of annexation, as well as the payment of any costs incurred subsequent to approval by LAFCO. AGENDA ITEM #32(B) -DISTRICT 7 "EE-1" Honorable Board of Directors Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County January 28, 1976 Page Two 2. In exchange for this area incurring an obligation to provide facilities normally payable from connection charges pursuant to the District's policy of providing trunk sewers within one-quarter mile of all properties, each separate parcel within the boundaries of the annexed area as of the date of election would be extended the equivalent of one connection charge credit at such time as the property is hooked to the sewer. In this regard, it is proposed that collector sewers be built either by cash financing, where possible, or by individual assess- ment proceedings. Additionally, it is expected that divisions of land after the date of election would result in the obligation to pay con- nection charges for all except the first connection. 3. As in the case of a private subdivision development, and as a condition of the general obligation.bond proceedings, the District will provide for the contribution from time to time from connection charges of a reimbursement of an appropriate dollar figure relating to that portion of the trunk system funded through the bond issue. It is here understood that there are currently outstanding previously executed reimbursement agreements amounting to approximately $150,000. For that purpose, an attempt will be made to adjust the reimbursement obligation in order to assure that the earlier contractors will not be unduly affected by this proposal. The proceeds of the reimbursements to the present area would be utilized for the purpose of retiring bonds in advance of maturity or, if more appropriate from a cost saving standpoint, for the payment of both principal and interest when due. It is presently understood that the £oregoing proposal would result in a maximum initial debt obligation for this annexation of some $1,141,000. The precise dollar figures must be refined by the assistance or the District staff and would be available at least in preliminary form at the time of presentation of the proposal to LAFCO. The final form would be before your Honorable Board prior to the actual formal hearing on the annexation. It is proposed that the matter should be expedited so that it may be placed on the ballot no later than November of thi.s year, with the understanding that property would be placed on the tax roll for the 1977-78 fiscal year. Any delay beyond November would result in a postponement into a later fiscal year. We hope that the foregoing proposal will result in a c]early equitable treatment of the property owners and users, both within the "EE-2" AGENDA ITEM #32(B) -DISTRICT 7 "EE-2" ' . .." ' ·- Honorable Board of Directors Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County January 28, 1976 Page Three present boundaries of Sanitation District No. 7 and within the proposed annexed area. It is our intent to assure that all persons are equally treated and that no unfair advantage or "free rides" are r'eceived and further to assure that the cost of sewers will not be so burdensome as to prove impossible of accomplishment. for PLMcE:s cc: Thomas L. Woodruff, Esq. Mr. George C. Rach Orange Park Association, Inc. "EE-3" AGENDA ITEM #32(s) -DISTRICT 7 "EE-3" "FF" RESOLlJI'ION NO. 76-39-7 AMENDING ANNEXATION POLICY A RESOLUTION OF TIIB BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 75-44-7, ESTABLISHING FEES AND PROCEDURES CONCERNING ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT, RE COMPUTATION OF ANNEXATION ACREAGE FEE * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to establish certain requirements for territory seeking annexation to this District; and, \~1EREAS, the Board of Directors of this District have heretofore adopted such requirements; and, WHEREAS, this Board of Directors has reviewed the heretofore established policy and finds that it would be appropriate to modify the provision for compu- tation of annexation acreage fee to eliminate inclusion of local collection systems because they have no bearing on the cost of the Districts' Master Plan system and treatment works equity; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Section 1, Sub-Section (b) of Resolution No. 75-44-7 is hereby amended to read as follows: ''(b) Beginning July 1, 1975, and annually thereafter, the sum to be paid per acre for the ensuing twelve months will be the net worth per acre of the District, reduced by the book value of local collection facilities, on the preceding June 30. Date of approval by the Board of Directors of the annexation shall govern the amount of the fee per acre hereinabove established." Section 2. That this resolution shall be effective ·as of July 1, 1975. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting hcl d February 11, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #33 -DISTRICT,7 "FF" -· CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORTS JANUARY 31., 19 76 ENGINEERING DEPART11ENT PECK P1P1tJG- 1 "1 sno.-1..a.Jtr IO AJ C.OllJ Tl ._,,LU::'S S1'1::P F£ED PIPIAJG. /i..t-JP Sl...U 1Ctr G-ATES {3E/NG-JllJSTAU..EP ,~~1!:>£. 50 10 9 e r 6 2 4 6 --8 /0 12 II I 4,....,.....-,...,..-L.. __ 1 ~~.JJ (LARIF/Ei(S ~AilNGSAIVD SWDE GATE'S S£iN& JN S7,4LJ...Jf£>//ll cFA/1&k! ~~A D/C.t:.~T£~~ Doo2. FAAfnES Bt:.l~ JN s;rAu..e:D D POJ\/£/{ Blfllf)//,/G fv1 GD ACTl\/.t\TED SLUDGE P.LANT C 0 ~\l TRAC 1· N 0. P 1 .-16 C.ONTRACT .NO .. P1.-t6 SO MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT Donovan Construction Company of Minnesota, Contractor STARTING DATE: June 27' 1974 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $29,876,ooo.oo PAID TO DATE: $23 320 978 92 ' , . Contract is for the construction of Activated Sludge second.ary treatment fad ii ties at Plant No. 1. The new facilities wiZZ aid the Districts in meeting trandated State and Federal ocean discharge requirements. When completed, the secondary treatment system ll.YiZl process the 50 mgd of wastewater flowing thro~gh Pfont No. 1. The. effluent wil"l then blend CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Dec. llJ' 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 30 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 13, 1977 UJith Plant No. 2 effluent• at the outfall booster station, improving the overall quality of water pwnped through the outfall system into the ocean. Significant structures included in the contract are t'he Bl.owe':ri BuiZding, Aeration Basins, Secon.d- axy CZa1-ifiers, two Digesters, ~!aste Sludge Thick- eners and the Power Building. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Facia panels have been poured at the tops of the north and south walls of the Blower Building. Electrj_cal switchgear has been set inside and the blowers themselves have arrived. Factory tests on the pump station engines were witnessed by engineering staff in Ohio. Tests on one of the Emergency Power turbine- generator units were also witriessed in San Diego. . . Piping and valves are being installed on top of the Aeration Basins. Step feed piping and sluice gates are being installed below the deck .. Overflow launders, slide gates and gratings are being installed in the Secondary Clarifiers. The piping installation continues in the Return Sludge Pump Station. At the Waste Sludge Thickeners, the baffles a~d mechanisms are being installed. Roofing materials are being put in place. No work was done in the Digester area this month. Hallow metal frames are being installed for the doors and panels in the Power Buildin~. joff".IC.E. I Er---1 '!'LlMP. /f!A·. I L _ --- JPL ACTS PROCESS PLANT JOB N2 .PW-045 ( CONTRACT PW~045 JPL-ACTS PROCESS PLANT J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation & Hcnck Pro, A Joint Venture, Contractor STARTING DATE: Oct. 1, 1975 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: x PAID TO DATE: x Contract is for construction of a one million gal- lon per dc.:y pilot wastewater> treatment plant at Wastewater Treatment Plant Noa 2o The plant wil], use a unique Activated Carbon Treatment System (ACl'S) developed by the National Aeronautics and Space.Agency's Jet Propulsion LahorutorrJ. This treatment method was perfected in its exper>imentai stages with a mobil,e research unit operri.ted by JPL personnel. at the Districts' Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 1 in Fountain VaZZey during 1974-750 The system uses sludge removed from the wastewater to produce activated carbon thr.ough a pyrolysis r.:actor. The activated carbcn is then l'ei~1tro­ (>'.>':i. into the vasteu.,ater stream in a secorr.da:ry L .. :Je for additional-ren-ova.Z of poZZutantso Only . partiaHy used after the second stage, the activa- CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 28, 1976 TI ME EX TENS IONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 28, 1976 ted carbon and secondary slud.ge slurr?J 1:s fed into the inco'ming wastewater stream to increase system efficiency o The mobile experimental unit used to refine this system from laboratory bench experiments was batch operated zJith mechanical hand.Ung of material from stage to stage. The p-z:lot p"Uznt will be a aonti.n- uously run, automated system. As a prime obcfective of the ACTS, it could solve an increasing problem of sludge disposal as this TiateriaZ becomes more plentiful with imp1>oved wastewate!• treatment and increased rLows. In a.d- dUion, . the effZuent from this treatment B];/Btem is expected to meet the discharge requirements of the Districts 1 Na Po DoEoSo permit a ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Work continuing with out problems.. Most rnaj or equipment has been delivered~ Filter press and g~avity filters are operational. Water side of plant is nearly complete for operational training. Paving south end of plant is scheduled for early this month. Calciner and related equipment to be operational by end of month. >:This contn1ct ia a design and conntl'uot t'!01:tract tJhercby the contractor i8 pa·id $50~ 000. 00 p7.ua t.lze actual conta foi• a.ii labor and matel'iala. ---\\\t\~ .se-G't'~ \.:> ~E"" ci..eS~ 'T?::> "'\'ro....) ....,..0.. ~~~\ c... ~oil-~1:" ('/\O~ O\S1. 2 coN\Rf\C\ NO· 2-14-3 CONTRACT 2 -14-3 SANTA AflA RlVER IftTERCEPTOR SEWER fi SOUTH SANTI\ /\NI\ HJVEH INTERCEPTOR CONNECTOR, REACHES 2, 3 & 4 John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contrnctor STARTING DATE: Oct. 15, 1975 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $3, 814, 462. 00 PAID TO DATE: $00. 00 Contract calls for the construction of a 3.125 ' mi.le reinforced conoretc pipe trunk Zinc cewcr a- long fo Palma Ave. from Grove St. to In.7)eria"l llz,;y. in /tnaheim. The first one-third of tha p11 oject uses 51 11 diam- eter pipe, the balance is 48". / 1 :1 included in the cont-ract is a latemt con- . '.,··.:' Uue to the Santa Ana River Int:crceptor · i::.: ( m from 300' north of Santa Ana Canyon Rdo a- long Imperial Hl.iYy. to La Palma Ave. ThiD 2750' CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Nov. 12, 1977 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Nov. 12, 1977 section of 33" diameter vitrified claiJ p1:pe ·is decigncd to l"eceive flows. from the South Rz:ver Trunk, E;erving Santa Ana Canyon. Ilith the con:ple- tion of the South Rivel' Trunk, the Santa Ana Can- yon pW7iping station can be ahar.donedo !l.1n:s cectfon of the intereeptor system is designed to handle up to 35 million gallons flow per dayo Inctuded in this figure is 30 MGD allowance for accepting futu11 e high brine waste1.i)ater flows from San Bernardino and Riversid.E Coimtieso ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH ~ontractor is excavating and shoring at the corner of Grove St. and .La Palma Ave., where the line crosses to the north side of the street. First pipe was laid ~ebruary 4th. Tunneling under the Santa Fe Railway tracks.to the east is scheduled to begin by the middle of the month. Permission has been obtained to close La Palma Ave. from Grove St. to Tustin Ave. for approximately one month to facilitate work in thi3 heavily.travelled portion of roadway. It is anticipated the contractor will close the street ·beginning the third week in February, possible sooner. ( C.-ON'l-Q.~c.\'::>~ L(\~1.i6-4'lPE Si~N& ~~t GYPSUM C.ANVON DI STRICT NO. 2 CONTRACT N 0. 2 -·14 -4 . . (. CONTRACT 2-14-4 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEh'ER, REACH 5 Kasler Corporation & L. II. Woods & Sons, Inc., Contrnctor ST ARTJ NG DATE: Oct. 15, 1975 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $4,240,957.00 PAID TO DATE: $186,135.50 Contmct io for construction of a 5.1 mile long section of rc·tnf orced concrete p-z:pe trunk line sewer from Imperial-Hwy. along La Palma Avco in Ana7wim, t1'averidng the new Yorba Rcgior.al P(JJ:'k to Weir Canyon Rd. The right-of-way then crosces the Santa Ana River at tli}o pl.aces as it traverses county territory through Santa Ana Val Zey Irriga- tion Co. and Bryant P.anch properties to Gypsum. Rd. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 7' 1977 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Da.ys PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 7' J.977 Depending on design c!'iteria, various cections of this line use 4 2, 4 5 and 51 inch diameter pipe. This cection wiU handle · fl-ows v.p to :rn miHion gallons per dayo Ir.eluded in thiD flgurc is 30 J.fGD allowance for accept-fog future high brine wastewater flows from San Berrun~dino and Riverside Counties. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH First pipe was laid in the ground Feb. 2nd at Bid Spring St. and La Palma Ave. Traffic control is in effect in this area for 1,000' on each side of the work area, limiting flow to one lane in each direction. Tree and brush clearing through the river bottom areas and orange groves along the right-of-way has been completed and debris hauled away. Natural growth and large trees have been preserved wherever possible along the pipe l"'oute through the Santa Ana Valley Irrigatiori Company and Bryant Ranch propertieso The contractor has erected temporary bridges across the Santa Ana River in two places for construction vehicle access. ____.. \"'Q-~ ~t.-c~ (.,-S lb~~ ~J-V.. DI ST. 2 CONTRACT No. 2-15 lO \!) ~ CAL STATE FULLERTON ~ CAMPUS ~ <) CONTRACT No. 2-15 YORBA LINDA PUMP STATION J. Putnam Hcnck, A Corporation & Hcnck Pro, A Joint Venture, Contractor STARTING DATE: Sept. 26, 197 4 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $671,14 6. 00 . PAID TO DATE: $592,791.09 Controct iv· for the const-ruction of a reinforced concrete Gtructure to house wet wells and pwnps for tmnsfen•ing tributaT"d LKJ.ste-water through a force m:iin line into the Santa Ana River, Ca:r.bon CamJon Interceptor-re Uef Trunk Line system for conveyance to I!asteu..'Clte:r• Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain VaUey. This liJil"l assist in relieving the presently congested Newhope-Placentia .Trunk Line and wiZl ser'Ve proposed land use development of the tributary ariea to the year 2010. The pump station st?~ctv:re ie located at the in- tersection of Yorba Linda Bouleva:f'd and Associated Road in Fu.Zlerton. It is being constructed on CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 22, 1975 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 81 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 10, 1976 liJhat liJa.s or1.:gfoally V>iiverisity of California, Ful- lerton property at the northern perimeter of tho. campus. Special arrangements were rrade u.:ith the Univ~rcity for use of the property. The above-ground portion of the structure wi lZ be a low profile slab 85~ x 109', 2 feet above ground. The deepest portion of the structure will be 35 feet wuler the ground. The District has agreed to construct a slump-stone fence around the st:rn..(.cture and landscape the area in accordance mth future compatible use by the University. The Vnive1 1sity plans to construct an arboretum in the immediate a1 1 ea at some future date. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Since last month, the contractor has completed installation ·or the outside side entrance and stairwell required by the Edison Company for access by their personnel. The red brick wall surrounding thr·ee sides of the pump station has been completed, and decorative sidewalks are partially completed. Landscape contouring has been completed and wells have been cut into the sidewalk along Yorba Linda Blvd. for the planting of decorative trees. Planting operations will begin about the middle of the month. Electrical wiring continues, and is now 90% complete, vs. 80% last month. Inside painting of the structure was begun during the month and continues~ Still awaiting pump motor deliveries. As reported last month, manufacturer promised shipment from his factory in Connecticut on Fe~ruary 15th, with arrival here at the end of this month. lU ...... ~ Q BELGRAVE ~ STANF"OR.D ' ~ ~ V) CHAPMAN AVE. N LAMPSON AVS .. ~AR OEN DI ST. 3 wwwwCOMPLETE WE5T SCHOOL AVE. · 8E5TEL AV£. "-----~----~!,. ------. TRASK AVE. ~ ._ -TO BE CONSTRUCTED ~1 CONTRACT No. 3 -20-1 ~ 1-/UM BQL T ~A tt. --------~ 21 ST. ST. i ~1·-~=====================~ ~ ~ WE'STMINSTE~ AV£. ---~------'---~-~~~ -~~--~~~~~-------------------, CONTRACT . No. 3 -20-1 KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 5 AND 6 Sully-Miller Contracting Company, Contractor STARTING DATE: Oct. 31, ~974 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $4,602,992.00 PAID TO DATE: $4,606,364.87 Contract is for installation of a 66 11 Reinforced . Concrete Pipe (R. C.P.) trunk line frnm the inter- section of Goldera.Jest Street and ~!estminster Ave- nue in Westminster to 1200 feet south of Kate l la Avenue on Knott Avenue in Stanton, a distance of approxirrately 2. 8 miles. Knott Avenue ie the northern extension of Goldera.Jest Street. This projeat is a portion of the Knott Interaeptor relief system designed to relieve the presently congested }filler-Hold£r"Trunk SezJer by intercep- CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 31, 1975 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 92 Calendar Da"ys PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 31, 1976 ting flows from the northi.iJest portion of District 3. The southerly terminus of the system is at the intersection of Brookhurst Street and Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley. It will eventually extend to Imperial. Avenue in La Habra. This portion of the relief system is designed to handle a flow of ? 5 mil lion ga Uons per day and will serve ·the proposed developed land use plan in the tributary area to the year 2010. ACTIVI.TIES DURING THE PAST MONTH JOB COMPIBTED J l'---~L 1/\/co~1."' ___ 11'---________ .Avr ___ . ~' L ~ --~~~~~~~~e-----~~~~- ~e-~-1'\\IE: ""tAAFi;.~ ~ "t"b•l'-llr \~~F.c;r\at-..\ "P~'/thC:r \b '!.i oee-Nt:: J> \'o \NS'~~t-l~' j,.\ ~€" ANb V'~,.. ·DIST. 3 ()RANGE CITY ~ BUENA ~ ~ PARK ~ ~ CERRITOS CITY CYPRESS 1 g DEL 6 MO/Iii! 2 g CITY OF ANAl-/EIM LllVDA AVE. ROAD AVE. ijbcus.:: 'ATE LL A { wwwwww COMPLETE ---.L.::~-=-=::..=..=..:=----'i, AVE. , ... -... TO BE CONSTRUCTED -------------.1 ""...___ ____ _ ~------ ;j ' CONTRACT No. 3-20-2 N CONTRACT No. 3-20-2 KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 7 A. G~ Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Co., A Joint Venture, Contractor STARTING DATE: ORIGINAL CONTRACT: PAID TO DATE: March 6, 1975 $3,876,870.00 $3, 261, 531. 00 Contract is for instaUation of a Reinforced Con- . crete Pipe (R. C.P.) seUJer line from a point 1200 · feet south of Kate 7:la Avenue on Knott Avenue in Stanton, north on Knott Avenue to Lincoin Avenue in Anaheim, a distance of 2. 3 miles. Pipe diame- ters are 72" for the first 3, 900 feet, 63" for 6, 900 feet and 66" for the remaining 1200 feet of the project. Flows from this reach wili drain in- to Contract 3-20-1 to the $Outh. This project is a portion of the Knott Interceptor relief cystem designed to relieve the presently CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: March 6, 1976 TI ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: March 6, 1976 congested ~filler-Holder Tnunk Seu-1er by intercep- ting flows from the northwest portion of District 3. The southerly terminus of the system is at the intersection of Brooklzurst Street ar~ Ellis Avenue in Fountain I'alley. It un:zz eventu.all.y extend to Imperial Avenue in I.a Habra. Thie portion of the re Zief system is designed to handZe a flow of 68 million gallons per day and wiZ.Z serve the proposed deveZoped Zand use plan in the tributary area to t1ze yeru? 2010. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Pipe heading is now at Olinda Ave. and Knott Ave., 2,100 feet from the end of the job. Traffic control, with one lane in each direction, now extends from Orange Ave. to Lincoln Ave. Traffic a~ the pipe heading is open to one lane only, with flagman control. The situation here is considered critical and the contractor· and the District engineer have requested permission from the City of An&heim for permission to close Knott Ave. to all but local traffic from Orange Ave. to Lincoln Ave. Pipelaying is completed across the intersection of Orange Ave. and Knott Ave., and should be paved bJr the night of the board meeting. All liner plate is in and spark tested as far north as Savannah Ave. · Tunneling operations at the railroad crossing south of Ball Rd. are complete. The exposed roadway will be paved by the time the board meets. Tunneling under the flood control channel north of Savannah Ave. is complete. Backfill and cleanup operations are underway. The contractor will begin excavations in the intersection of Ball Rd. and Knott Ave. February 10th for installation of a 12" connector sewer and trunk line vent. This operation will last approximately 2 weeks. ~ -~E"C-.b~~ l-U.le-5' ""r-::. ~e-eo"°' ~-,-el> DI ST. 3 _!11111:1,....:mm COMPLETE JEii r:n ma TO BE CONSTRUCTED CONTRACT No. 3-21-1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LlA AVG'. ~ <:) ~ ~ '-' ~ ~ )'( ~ ~ FARGUl-IA~ AllE. CONTRACT No. 3 -21 -1 WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 25, 26 & PORTION OF 27 A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Company, A Joint Venture, Contractor STARTING DATE: June 26, 1975 $1,416,448.00 $1,417,834.14 CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 22, 1976 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: PAID TO DATE: Contrac~ is for the installation of a Vitrified Clay Pipe (V.C.P.) sewer> from the vicinity of the District's flestside Lift Station, . 1800 feet tJest of Seal Beach Boulevard and I.mrrpson Avenue along the flood control channel, along the ohanneZ. to Seal Beach Bouleva:t'd whe:r>e it turns north along Los Alamitos Boulevard (the no:r>the1'7l extension of Seal Beach Boulevard.) to Katella Avenue. It tlzen tz.TnS east on Katezia to Lexington Drive, where it tenninates. Pipe diameter is 39" for the first 5, 500 feet, 36" for the next .5, 700 feet and 30" for the final 5, 200 feet. Total. Z.ength is approx- imately 3.1 miles. This project is a continuation of the Westside Relief Intc:r>cepto:r> sewer which begins at the Seal. Beach Boulevard Pumping Station at the intersec- TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 qalendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 22, 1976 tion of Seal Beach Boulevard and Westminster Ave- nue in the City of Seal Beach. The system wiZZ. eventually run generally in a northerly direction through the western portion of District 3 and will terminate at Cresent Avenue and Moodij Street in the City of La Palma. Upon completion, the system will relieve the Los AZamitos Subtrunk Sewer which, at present, func- tions as the main interceptor sewer for the West- side basin and, for the most part, is currently ]lowing at or ner.w peak capacity. This portion of the 2?elief interceptor is designed to handZ.e flows of up to 14.? million gallons per day and wiZl serve the proposed developed land use pl.an in the tributary area to the year 2010. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Relocation of an existing 20" force main to the Westside Lfft Station that was in conflict with the new trunk line has been completed. The final section of trunk line at the south end of the project has been installed, and all underground facilities of the new line inspected and accepted by the District engineer. Five local sewer line interceptors remain to be connected to. the trunk line at Bloomfield St., Orangewood Ave., Bradbury Rd., and Katella Ave. (2) to complete.the job by the end of February. The contractor will slurry seal the number one northbound lane on Los Alamitos Blvd. in the· City of Seal Beach at his cost because of heavy surface scoring caused by his equipment during operations. f I S UMMARY TREATJVJENT PLANT WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Tot a l Work During January Total Work Awaiting Award DI STRICT TRUNK LINE WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work t o Date Tota l Work During January TOTAL AMOUNT UNDER CONTRACT AND AWAITING AWARD $29 ,8 76 ,000 23 ,320 ,979 592,347 293 ,969 $21 ,922,552 10 ,069 ,258 363,942 $29 ,876 ,ooo 293 ,969 $21 ,922 ,552 $52 ,092 ,521 !T:.H. Cir C /\lir0~J~l.'.-Tt:( J.[50UP.CE5 AGENCY SYATE \'./ ATi:R P.ESOUr~CES CONTROL BOARD P, o. DOX 100 • SACRAMENTO 95801 JAN 2 9 1976 Mr. Ray Remy Exec utive Director Southern California Association of Gover nments 600 S. Comm onwealth Avenue, Suite 1000 Lo s Angeles, CA 90005 ; .. Agenda Item No. 6(b) £DJ.I.UNO G . BROWN JR., G<•vorn or In Reply Refer To: 40l:BD DESI GN ATION OF THE SOUT H COA ST 208 PLANNING AREA The State Water Resources Control Board, at its January 22 meet ing, de s i gnate d the boundaries of the South Coast 208 p l a n n ing area and desi gnate d, subject to conditions, the S out hern California As so cia tion of Gove rnme nts as the 208 planning agency for the area. Enclos ed are copies of the Board's designation resolution, "Program for Development and Imp lement at ion of Areawide Waste Tr eatment Management Plans--Part I, Designated Areas and Agencies", and the staff "Ampli ficat ion of Po licy on 208 Planning in Designated Areas ". Th ese latt er two it ems are referenced in the conditions of desig- nation. This ma terial was provided informally to Messrs . Holden and Mag istrale of your staff following the January 22 State Board meeting . I call your attention to those conditions of designation which must be fulfilled \.vi.thin 90 days of the date of the Boar d's desig- nati o n. In making the designation, Board Members expressed the position that there sho uld be no extension of the 90-day per i od . It is, the refore , imperat ive that you concentrate your initial efforts on this portio n of the conditions of designation. In recognition o f your age ncy's statements and the concern of loc a l governments , the Board also spec i fied that your submittal in fulfil lment of the 90-day conditions must include an approxi- mation of the total dollar amount of antic i pated 208 grant funds th a t ·will be required for direct support of SCAG staff and the general duties that would be performed by that staff. You will note that the Board's designation reso lutio n directs th at I am to transmit this designat i on to EPA for considerat ion of approval and funding after the Board has approved the manner a nd substance of your o.gency ' s compliance with the condition~ o f designation. The Board recognizes th at willful noncooperation ,, Mr. Ray Remy -2-JAN .29 19 75 on the part of other agencies can impede your ability to comply with the conditions of designation. Accordingl y, t h e Bo ard h a s instructed that I notify the major units of gover nm ents of the Board's expectation and strong desire for their coope ration with you in meeting the conditions of designation. Should you have any questions, please contact Bill Davis of our planning staff. 1~~~~~~~ Executive Officer Enclosures (3) cc: See attached list Agenda Item No. 6(b) EXHIBIT A STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 76-1 January 22, 1976 CONDITIONS OF DESIGNATION Following are the general conditions prescribed by the Board for the designation of the South Coast Areawide Planning Area and the designation of the Southern California As sociat io n of Governments as the planning agency for the South Coast Areawide Planning Area. Specific conditions also are pre scribed by the Board and follow the general conditions. If the designated agency comp lies with these conditions to the sat isfaction of the Board, the designation will be forwarded to EPA for approval. If the Board determines that the designated agency has failed to comply with conditions prescribe d at the time of designation by the Board, the Board will terminate its designation and assume responsibility for the required planning in the area. · General Conditions: A. Within 90 days of the date of designation by the State Water Resources Control Board, the designated planning agency shall submit to the Board for approval: (1) A description of the procedures and process that will be used to: (a) Integrate areawide waste treatment management planning and air quality ma intenanc e planning activiti es for purposes of workplan preparation; (b) Ensure consistency between the areawide waste treatment management plan and air quality maintenance plan(s); (c) Provide for coordinated i mplementation of areawide waste treatme nt management and air quality maintenance plans.· This description shall include the a greeme nts exe cuted with the major units of government needed to implement the procedures and process and evidence that those governments endorse the procedures and process. As used herein, major units of government shall mean at le ast those agencies· listed in Specific Condition A. (2) Description of the intergovernme ntal relationships that will exist during the planning process, including : (a) Definition of the decision-making process, including the provisions for conflict resolution during plan development and approval phases; (b) (c) ( d) 2 Definition of the roles of local general-purpose governments, regional agencies, and special districts during plan development and approval, in the selection and evaluation of alternative plans, and in selection of the final management plan; Executed a greements with major units of governme nt necessary to implement the intergovernmental relation- ships -and evidence that those units of government endorse and agree to participate in suc h relationships. The interg overnmental relationship s e s tabli.shed for the planning process shall provide that agencies responsible for the collection, treatment, and/or disposal of sewage sha ll certify that those portions of the areawide plan which specify sewage collection, treatment, and disposal s y stems or facilit i es are the optimum system or facilities for the area and that implementation of the areawide plan will not delay the construction of waste treatment and disposal facilities needed to meet an order of any Regional Water Quality Control Board, or the State Water Resources Control Board, or which may b e needed to imple ment further the applicable basin water quality control plan or meet the requirements of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Where such certification cannot b e given, the reasons for noncertification s hall be specified to the desig- nated planning agency, together with the change s which must be made in order to obtain such certi f ic a tion. This requirement may be waived by the Board if the Board determines that suc h certification is not in the best interests of environmental protection in the South Coast Areawide Planning Area or any portion the r e of. (3) Description of the program management structure that the designated agency will use to manage and direct the plan- ning process, including: (a) Definition of the roles and relations hips between all involved organizational units within the designated agency; (b) Definition of all advisory committees that will be formed, their relations hip and access to the decision- making pro c ess, and the recommended membership of each advisory committee; (c) Definition of the procedures to be used in soliciting proposals for work and selection of consultant services; I' 3 . (d) Definition of the duties, authorities, and minimwn qualifications of the 208 Project Manager and the procedures to be used in selection o·f the Proje ct Manager. (e) Evidence of concurrence in the program management structure by major units of government. (4) Description of the planning approach that will be used in formulating the areawide plan, including: (a) The means and methods for incor poration of ·land use considerations to ·ass ure that land use planning recognizes air quality and water quality constraints; (b) The means and methods for inc orporation of the results of planning by utility agencies (e .g ., water supply, waste tre atment and disposal, transportation, and energy) in deve lopment of the plan; (c) A description of the means and methods for assess ing the social, economic, and environmental impact of implementing existing and alternative land use-utility service plans; (d) The specific issues that will be addres sed during the planning program; (e). Evidence of concurrence in the planning approach by major units of government. (5) Description of the procedures and arrangements for coordi- nating areawide planning with other major planning and management efforts in the area including , b ut not limited to, municipal waste treatment faci l ity planning under Section 201, regional water quality control p l anning u nder Section 303(e), solid waste management planning, and coastal zone management planning. Such procedures shall not duplicate such efforts and shall not delay implementation of such plans. B. In addition to the·fore go ing, the Southern California Association of Governments shall at all times: (1) Comply with the provisions of, and execute all agreements required by, the Board's "Program for Development and Implementat ion of Areawide Waste Treatment Management Plans --Part 1, Designated Areas and Agencies" and the "Amplification of Policy on 208 Planning in Des i gnat ed Areas" dated November 25 , 1975. The subject po licy requires, among other things, the establishment of a Program Review Board consisting of state and EPA repre- sentatives. 4 (2) Closely coordinate its planning process with the appro- priate Re g ional Water Quality Control Board and make adequate provision for Regional Board participation in the planning process. (3) Con ce ntrate the scope of the planning on development of management co nt rol s for nonpoint sources not provided in basin water quality control plans and coordination of water and air quality with land use deci s ion-making to achieve water and air quality goals and standards • . (4) As sume as a g iven for the planning process that water quality standards shall be attained and. with re spect to factors external to the designated area, planning by the State and enforcement action by the Regional Boards will control such factors so that standards shall be achieved at the boundaries of the 208 area. (5) Assure that the form and content of the water quality control .and management portions of the areawide plan are in a form which is acceptable to, and can be adopted by , the appropriate agency including the Regional Water Quality Control Bo a rd, and shall conform to the provisions of federal and state law and regulation. c. If the agreements and concurrences required by these condit ions are not obtainable, the designated agency shall define the deficiencies and shall provide a full description of the reason for lack of such agreements or concurrence. Specific Conditions The followin g specific conditions shall apply toget her with the foregoing genera l conditions as indicated below. A. The Southern California Association of Governments shall prov ide for full participation and concurrence of at least the following agencies in the pla nning process and shall specifically name these agenc i es in the submittals required by t h e General Conditions of the designation : • Counties of Lo s Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, and Riverside • City of Los An geles • County Sanitation Di stricts of Los Angeles County • Orange County Sani tat ion Districts • Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority • Metropolitan Water Di strict • Los Angeles County Flo od Control District ' . 5 • California Regional Water .Quality Control Boards, Los Angeles, Santa Ana, and San Diego Regions • South Coast Air Basin Air Quality Maintenance Planning Policy Task Force • Newport-Irvine Waste Mana g ement Planning Agency B. The Southern California Assoc iation of Governm e nts shall coordinate its planning process with the process being used by the County of Los An ge l es in preparation of the latter's general plan. The procedures and process required under the gene ral conditions of designation shall include the procedures for such coordination. C. The Southern California As soc iation of Government s shall execute a n agre ement with the Ventura Regional County Sanitation District for the conduct of planning in the Ventura County portion of the area. Such a gr eement shall be executed within 90 days of the date of desig nation by the State Water Re so urces Control Board. D. Membership in the Southern California Associati on of Governments shall not be made a condition of participation in the planning process resulting from this designation. E. Adequate opportunity s hall be provide d for the pa rticipat ion of affected parties i n the planning pro cess . F. Prepara tion of the a r eawi d e plan shall be coordinated with the South Coast Air Bas in Air Qu ality Ma intenance Pla nning Policy Task Forc e , the p l anning pro gram of the Ca lifornia Department of Water Reso ur ces , the planning programs of t h e California Regional Water Qua lity Control Boards--Los Angeles , Santa Ana, and San Diego Reg i o n s , and t he Me t ropolita n Water Di strict. Th e procedures and process required under the ge n e r a l conditions of desi gnation shall include the procedures for coordination with the programs nam ed in this condition . I /·1< . . / . j' . /, •.,, .\i / ... -~ '·. ~ COALlllGA\\. -,:·-.__.,,._..,r·..._ ~""""'t:. ) . ...., -~ ~ ~. ,,,...-· ~ -_,, ..... """~ ~ . '- ~' > ·p~ -, ... ~ ... ~ t .. ' "_: "-~ '. '-'~ .,, ' -. ·~ .. • .. >. •. ·,',.-1\·· ... . (" \: 7 ~ (> .. ... .. .. ., ... ·~=""' ~ •. . ·o:..·.·· ··' • .... I :.',, PA~MP .\. ... \~ ... , ~, ....... a.. .. , .. ......... R 0 ( ./ .. --,"-.. , .. ~ . \ I \\ f ' I '> ' ' { , ' \ ' .. ', ' ' . ..... ' .... ·'.. \ " I 'c ... \ . -' • .... ,J (/) C"OCllWALLA • :::0 i-3 tz:j > .• 0 •. ,.... ~~E llll~ERIAL ... •' ~ . ' . ' -···ti (/) i-3 ~ 0 tz:j )>L'C"l zc:o~ C:i-3:.:::::r> )> H i-3 i-3 tz:j :::0 0 :::0 t=.i >< ~zo~::r: L' H l\.) z :::0 to l\.) 0 tI:I tz:j H ... • 0 CJ) i-3 ...... -..J~gt:D '° ()\ t::1 :::0 -..J I o ()\...... tz:j CJ) ' ( ·; IJA~-·---------~------- !=" '( LAW OFFICES RICHARD O. FRAZEE STEPHEN C.STEWART THOMAS L. WOODRUFF .JEFFREY A. HARTMAN Stewd rt, '\T ooJ ruff & frazee Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager 1055 NORTH MAIN STREET, SUITE 1020 SANTA ANA, CALI FOR NIA 92701 February 4, 1976 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Re: Proposed Land Exchange -Jane Ayers District No. 2 Dear Fred: AGENDA ITEM #6(c) AR EA CODE 714 835-6212 I have reviewed the letter of January 26, 1976 submitted by Jane Ayers to the District which I have considered as a counter offer on her part to the terms and conditions which we recom- mended to the Boards of Directors on January 6, 1976. I have, this date, also conferred with Mrs. Ayers at length concerning the provisions set forth in her letter as compared with the· conditions outlined in my memorandum of January 6th. I further pointed out to her that the position of the District was that we had received a general request from her to exchange property of approximately equal quantity to establish a squared property line approximately perpendicular to Brookhurst Street. I further indicated that the Directors had authorized staff to proceed on this basis and, therefore, the conditions of Mrs. Ayers paying legal fees, appraiser fees, dedicating right of way to the City of Huntington Beach and ultimately being responsible for the improvement of the street frontage, were conditions which neither you, as General Manager, nor I, as General Counsel, could waive. During the course of our dicussion, she indicated that she had made a tentative agreement with Covington Brothers, prior to the District's acquiring our present parcel, whereby Covington would provide all of the necessary transfers, dedi- cations, improvements and those items essentially being requested of Mrs. Ayers by the District at this time. She, therefore, expressed her concern that the District was not making an offer essentially similar to that proposed by Covington Brothers. In turn, she indicated that she was Mr. Fred A. Harper February 4, 1976 Page Two not prepared to pay the District for appraisal and legal services in connection with this proposed transfer, but would pay for the engineering and survey costs. I indicated to Mrs. Ayers that the improvement of Brookhurst Street along the frontage of the property she would receive in this proposed exchange could likely be deferred until such time as she actually develops the property. I further indi- cated that the District had no legal obligation to make those improvements at this time, but that we were voluntarily entering into an agreement with the City of Huntington Beach for improve- ment of other frontage southerly of the exchanged area. Lastly, I indicated that I did not feel that the District would sponsor the application for a zone change for the area which she would receive. I did indicate that I would recommend that the exchange be contingent upon her successfully obtaining the requested zoning of R-3 from the City, but that the obligation should essentially be hers. I would not envision that the zone change application would be either difficult or time- consuming and, therefore, would not be a burden upon either Mrs. Ayers or the District to pursue. In view of the fact that her letter dated January 26, 1976 effectively constitutes a counter offer, I would recommend that it be brought to the attention of the Directors in order that they may accept, reject or propose a counter- counter offer. We will then be able to proceed in accordance with the Directors' decision. In the meantime, no further work will be done to effect the exchange. TLW:ab Enclosure Very truly yours, ~ Thomas L. Woodruff General Counsel Mr. Thomas L. Woodruff .1'\ttorney at Law 1055 North Main Street, Suite 1020 Santa lU1a, Ca. 92701 January 26, 1976 Re: Property exchange with Sanitation District Dear Mr. Woodruff: ~s pursuant to our conversation on January 14, 1976, at the Meeting of the Joint Administrative organization, the proposed land exchange as set forth in the Memorandum is unacceptable. .. However, I still desire to exchange the land, but on a mut- u~lly equitable bases, such proposed conditions are as follows: 1. That the amounts as indicated in the Memorandtm where the Sanitation District is to convey 3700 square feet, of which 1786 square feet is presently dedicated for street widening leaving a net of 1~14 square feet and I convey 1917 square feet to the Sanitation District, is acceptable. 2. That since the parcel held by the Sanitation Dist- rict is zoned R-0, and my property is zoned R-3, any exch- ange is to be conditioned on the agreement that the Sanit- ation District, at their expense have that portion of land to be conveyed to me, rezoned R7.3 so that it shall conform with the remainder of my parcel of property. 3. That since the parcel I would receive is contiguous with the street of Brookhurst, it would necessaril~~ result in the fact that as the owner I \vould incure an obligation to improve t:he boundry with the street for ~urb.s, gutters, paving and etc at such time as the land would be improved. There, however, would be no such costs incurred by the District upon receipt of the land I would convey to District. In essence then I would be relieving t~e District of an obligation that they are presently liable for. Therefore, the Sanitation District must agree to reimburse or indemnify or pay for a portion of the cost to improve that portion of l~nd which are to be conveyed. 4. That since I had tentatively agreed to pay for surveying costs, I shall consent to that. Page 2 Jan• 26 I 1976 5. That all other costs shall be paid for and by the Sanitation District. 6. That no other conditions or encumbrances be placed upon either parcel to be conveyed, ie.·improving my land when the district so does. The above conditions, except paragraph No. two (2) are negotia~le, i€ it may be necessary to have a mutual acceptable exchange by both parties. If you have any other alternatives or suggestions please contact me or my son who's phone number is ME 41625 (213) during day, so that we may discuss such suggestions before the next meeting of the Joint Sanitation Board which as I understand is February 11, 1976. If such date is wrong please inform me of the exact date for such meeting. Q.rs, AYERS REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN 2-11-76 REPORT ON THE CASA MEETING IN INDIAN WELLS, THE OTHER DIRECTORS WHO ATTENDED WERE LEONARD MAcKAIN AND DoN Fox. REPORT ON THE PENDING MEETING FOR THE FORMATION OF AN ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF LOCALLY ELECTED OFFICIALS TO THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD, No EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY, NOTE: IN THE EVENT CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRE AN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING, INVITE 2 DIRECTORS: -~,;ii+< ROBERT BATTiN EDWARD BYRNE DALE CHAPUT RALPH CLARK SUMMARY OF DISTRICT'S ACTIONS RE PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. S09, AMENDING CONNECTION AND USE ORDINANCES NO. SOS, AS AMENDED, AND ORDINANCE NO. S08 At an adjourned meeting on December 11, 197S, the Board of Directors, following a review of five-year increased funding requirements brought about by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act,~the California State Ocean Plan and other factors,vdeclared their intent to increase connection fees. o,Mc 0;-tJt ·' l.P\IAJ., i.,., \) ~ IN,.,\ r.L~ s,,""e,.,"' Q~ roel.k ,.,J..J'~) On January S, 1976, pursuant to provisions of existing ordinances, Notic~of Intent to Adopt Ordinance No. S09, Amending Connection and Use Ordinances No. SOS, as amended, and Ordinance No. S08, and setting forth the hearing dates therefor, were mailed to existing permit holders, and the City of Newport Beach. On February S, 1976, Agendas of the hearing and copies of the proposed ordinance were mailed to lS directors and others ~the District's mailing list. /'.r ~~· 'l'I OtJ ~To date.lwe have received no written connnents. <\'oN·~~l l,,w,",rl 1 ~ scl L'r J ~~ ~--~ ~-\ vJ ~~-1 •ic 0 ~ J ·-c--L le> I 141 {.. 'C) :;.( L, ,_c L. ~ ~ ~l l~~~ ,, l ,.....) ~ rJI. ( fVi/N ' I ' d ' t (', ()IF l 1#.Jfl r '-Nii Sb( h-Nd -"\...·'-A-~Q . '(!;.' ,,;..",c. Vt o ~- MEMORANDUM February 9, 1976 TO: Members of the Boards of Directors FROM: Donald Fox, Chairman COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 Selection Committee for Procurement of Professional Services On Thursday, February 5th, the Corrunittee met with staff and a result of this meeting is the enclosed recorrunended procedures. The Committee recognizes that these procedures should be reviewed within a period of from six to nine months a.nd with changes or modifications made as necessary. A verbal report will be given at the Joint Boards Meeting of February 11th to fully explain, in more detail, the Committee'·s recommendations~ DF:REL:hje A POLICY OF TIIE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OP ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR THE SELECTION OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY ESTABLISH THESE PROCEDURES FOR THE SELECTION AND PROCUREMENT OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES: Section 1. Selection of Engineering and Architectural Firms. In the selection of a consulting architect or engineer, it must be realized that no two firms or consultants have equal training, experience, skill, capabilities or work loads to meet the demands of any contemplated project. There are six major areas that will be used in the evaluation to select an architect or engineer: A. The firm shall be of high ethical and professional standing, its members being of good moral character, and it shall be prepared to submit references from persons of known repute. B. The principal and other responsible members of the firm must be registered in the State of California. C. A principal member of the firm's staff must have at least ten years' recent experience in responsible charge of work of the type involved in the project. D. At least two additional members of the firm's staff must have at least five years' experience in responsible charge in the field, or fields, required by the project. E. If all other factors are equal, preference shall be given to a local .firm when more than one firm is being considered. F. A firm selected where the fees are greater than $10,000, must certify as to an affirmative action program. Section 2. Scope of the Project. For every project, regardless of the size, approved by the Board(s), and for which outside professional services are required, the staff shall develop a comprehensive scope of the project. The scope shall define, in detail whenever possible, the extent of the professional services, the time required, and shall develop a maximtun fee for the services sought. This scope of work shall be sub- mitted to the Board(s) when requesting authority to solicit proposals. The maximum fee amount shall not be made public, but will be available to the Board members upon request. Section 3. Selection of Engineer, A. Projects where services are less than $10,000, Projects where the professional fees are less than $10,000 are usually specific, small projects normally requiring specialization in one or two fields of endeavor. Staff shall select that firm who appears best qualified for the project. Negotiations for compensation to the firm shall be conducted between the consultant, the Districts' Chief Engineer and the Districts' Project Engineer. The recommendation for selection will be submitted to the Board(s) for their approval. The evaluation of the consultant's qualifications and the fee negotiations will not be made public but will be available to any Director upon request. B. Projects where services are greater than $10,0·00 but less than $100,000. Staff shall select at least two known firms that appear to be best qualified for the project. Each firm, after being thoroughly informed .as to the scope of the project and the extent of the services required, shall submit to a Selection Committee two sealed envelopes. One envelope, clearly identified as ·"Consultant's Qualifications", shall contain the qualifications and records of the firm, the capabilities to complete the work within the time allotted, the specific key personnel assignable to the project, and other information as may be required to properly evaluate the firm's qualifications. The second envelope shall be clearly marked "Charges for Consulting Services". A Selection Conunittee, comprised of the Joint Chairman of the Boards of Directors, or the District Chairman, or their designee, the Districts' Chief Engineer, Director of Finance and Superintendent, shall review the qualifications of each consultant, checking with recent clients if necessary, determining the quality of performance. Each firm being considered shall be listed in order of desirability, taking into account location, reputation, experience, financial standing, size, personnel availability, quality of references, work load and other factors peculiar to the project being considered. To determine the compensation for the services sought, the following will be strictly adherred to: 1. Invite the firm that is considered to be the best qualified to appear before the Selection Committee. 2. In the presence of the consultant, the Selection Conunittee shall open the second envelope marked "Charges for Consulting Servicesn. The compensation requested by the consultant shall be compared with the maximum fee as previously established. The final negotiated fee, as recom- mended to the Board(s) of Directors, shall be certified by the Selection Committee and approved by the General Manager as reasonable for the services requested and not resulting in excessive profits for the consultant. 2. 3. If agreement is. not reached, the negoti_a,ti.ons: should be termin-. ated and similar interviews· should then follow with the second firm. All such negotiations shall be on a strictly confidential basis and in no case shall the compensation discussed with one consultant be discussed with another, or made public. 4. After reaching successful negotiations with a firm, the firm(s) which have not been interviewed for the purpose of compensation negotiations shall have the second envelope, marked "Charges for Consulting Services" returned unopened. The return of the unopened envelope is essential for the District(s) to maintain creditability with the professional community. C. Projects where services are greater than $100,000. The same procedure as outlined for services between $10,000 and $100,000 shall be used except as follows: 1. Adequate public notice shall be given by the publication of a notice of request for proposals which shall appear in profes- sional journals or publications of general circulation. The extent of the circulation of the publications shall be at least Statewide. The advertisement shall request written proposals for qualifications only. 2. A Screening Conunittee, which shall also act as the Final Selection Conunittee, comprised of the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Boards, or their designee, the Districts' General Manager, Chief Engineer, Director of Finance and Superintendent, shall select at least three firms who appear best qualified for the particular project. In the case of professional services for the individual District(s), the Chairman of that District or his designee shall substitute for the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Boards on the Selection Committee. Each firm so selected shall be ranked to desirability, and negotiations shall be similar to those as set forth for projects where fees are between $10,000 and $100,000. Section 4. Continuation of Services. In some cases, where a consulting firm has satisfactorily completed one phase in the development of a project and the Boardls) determine that it might be in the best· interest to retain this firm for subsequent phases of work, then the Selection Committee can proceed directly with the negotiations for compensation with this consultant. This would be particularly true when a firm has completed a feasibility report or a master plan report and the services as provided for said report are satisfactory to the Board(s), then the procedure of examining other consultants would not be necessary and the Selection Committee would proceed with the negotiations for compensation for subsequent phases. In the event that satisfactory negotiations for price cannot be reached, then the provisions set forth hereinabove would apply. 3. Section 5. Compensation for Engineering ·and Architectural Services, When the scope of the project can be well defined and the individual elements of the engineering cost well defined, a lump sum payment, fixed fee or per diem rates with a maximum contract shall be written. The agreement for payment to the consultant on this basis must clearly state the scope and the time limits in which the services must be performed. The agreement should provide for fee adj«1stments should there be changes in the scope of work. Progress payments made to the consultant during the time the se'.i.."Vices are being supplied shall be on a percentage of the work completed to date, as approved by the Districts' Cfiief Engineer and reconunended to the Board(s) of Directors for payment. When the scope of the project cannot be well defined, such as in the prepar- ation of engineering studies, feasibility reports, master plan reports, etc ,, contract shall be on the basis of per diem rates for the various classifications as required, with a maximum amount assigned to the contract. If it is the decision of the Selection Committee to use other methods for compensation other than the lump sum or fixed payment, or the per diem rates with a maximum, justifications for this decision shall be made by the Selection Committee in their recommendation to the Board(s) of Directors for the consulting services. Section 6. Term of Selection and Procurement Procedures. This policy shall become effective on February 11, 1976 for a period of at least six months and no longer than nine months from the effective date . These procedures shall be reviewed within said six to nine month period with modifications or changes reconunended to the Board(s) for subsequent policy procedures. 4. MEETiiffi DATE February 11, 1976 TI ME 7 : 30 p. m. DISTRICTS 1, 2. 3 s 6 z & 11 DISTRICT 1 RI MA. • • • • • • • {)_, ~D ~R~CH) •••..• BATTIN..... v == == E~NS .••.•••••• GARTH E • • • • • " SHARP •••••••••• SAL TAR ELLI. " == == DISTRICT 2 (LYONS). · · · • • • • • • CAL LAH.AN. • • ./ EWING) .....••••• CHAPUT •.•••• -./----- DIEDRICH) •••••• CLARK ••••••• -v..,----- GARTtiEl. ..••••. EVANS....... .; == == THOt-1) ..•..••.••• KAYWOOD •••• _., ____ _ FOX) .......••••• MAC KA IN. • • ' JACKMAN) ••••••• PEREZ....... ~ == == PERRY •• ~~··-'-___ _ !SVALSTAD) •••••• SCOTT./~ •• _v ____ _ DUNN[:) •••••••••• WINN. ·fJ ·j ... -" _ __ WARD) ••••••••••• WOOD .• \:" ••••• ---7-== _ GRAHAM} ••••••• ~ YOUNG ••••••• _____ _ DISTRICT 3 (HOMRIGH(\USEN). COX ......... _v __ 1 _-1 __ _ (COLL I NS) ••••••• BYRNE ••••••• _6.w_ _6_ __ CULVER. ••••• ~ _-__ _ ~GRIFFHJL .•.••• BA-¥+8:' ••.•.• ~1~ __ GARTH EL ••••••• EVANS ..••••. _L_ _+ __ _ M KAIN) •••••• FOX .•..•••.• _v __ +-__ _ !NE'V'I LJ .......... GRAHAM ••••• __ ,_,. _-1. ___ . THOM) ••••••••••• KAYWOOD •••• -"-__ -__ ,.. ) ./ SONJU ••• \ •••••• MAC LA IN ••• ____ -__ BLACKMANJ ..•••• MC KNEW •••• -"-__ -__ OLSON .•••••• _1 __ .,. __ _ ! D I ED R I CH) ••.••• SCH MI T. . . • • • _ft::_ ~ __ G I BBS ). . . • . • . • • • SH I PL E Y. • • • • + QI; -:" __ STANTON) •.•••.• SVALSl;Alj..· .• --; --= __ WOOD) •••••••.••. WARD •• f.a ~ ••• --r _+ __ _ (ARBISOl ••..•••• WEISHAUPT .• ___ + __ _ DISTRICT 5 (RYCKOFF)\ ...... MC INNIS .•• _./. ___ . __ _ (DIEDRICH J •••••• RI LEY •••.••• -'-· _._· _. _. ROGERS. •••.• __fi!t_ ___ _ DISTRICT 6 (MC INNIS) .•.••• STORE ....... _..; ____ _ (DIEDRICH) .••••• BATTIN. ••••• -"-___ _ . R I MA ••••••.. __!:::___ __ __ DISTRICT 7 E'"'NS ...•••••• GARTHE..... v .l A..,-HONY) .•••••. BURTON ••.•. -.;--~--- DI EDR IC H) .••.•• CLARK ..•••• ~ fJ-== \MC INNIS) ...... ~.... ? --= __ --GLOCKNER. • _L_ - ( ~EREZ-l .•••••.•• JACKMAN!'--~. _v_ -== (SHARP) .••••.•••• SALTARELLI. _..; ___ -__ DISTRICT 11 (DIEDRICH) •..••• SCHMIT. •.••• ___!::__ ___ _ 1 DUKE .•••••.• _L_ ___ _ \ w I ED ERL ....... GI BBS ••••.•. _../_ ---- DISTRICT 8 EDWARDS .••• ______ _ (JOHNSON) •..•••• HOLM ..••••• (DIEDRICH) •••••• RI LEY . ." ••••• ~ == == JOINT BOARDS DI EDR IC~ ..•••• BA TT I N ••••••• _../ _ __ ANTHONY ....•••• BURTON ••••••• _../ __ _ COLLI ~S ....•.•• BYRNE ••.••••• ~ __ L VONS .......••• CALLAHAN .•••• _v __ _ EWING ......•••• CHAPUT ••••••• _.,, __ _ DIEDRICHL ..•.. CLARK •.•••••• a... HOMRIGHAUS EN) •. COX-• . • • • • • • • • '-' == CULVER....... ./ ! GR I FF I N ) .••••••• BAV I S-: ••••••• -../--- MC INN Is L ..... OOSTAC ...... -v-,-- GI BBS) •••.•••••. DUKE......... v == GARTHE) •....•••• EVANS........ ./ MAC KA IN) ..••••• FOX •••••••••• -v--- (EVANS).········ ·GARTHE· • • • • • • -v--- (WI EDER).······· ·GIBBS········ ./ == GLOCKNER • • • • v !NEVIL) •••••••••• GRAHAM....... v == PEREf_) •••••••••• JACKMAN •••••• _./ __ _ THO~) ••••••••••• KAYWOOD •••••• _./ __ _ FOX).\ •••••••••• MAC KA IN •••• _./ __ _ SONJUJ) ••••••••• MAC LA IN •••• _v_ (RY~OFF •.••••.••• MC INNIS. •••• _.,_== (BLACKMAN) •••••• MC KNEW •••••• -" __ _ OLSON. • . . • • • • ., (JACKMAN) .••••••• PEREZ •••••••• -.; --- PERRY .••.••.• -.;--- (DIEDRICH) •••••• RILEY •.•••••• -"---. RIMA •••••••.• 4-== ROGERS....... £.. SHARP) •.•••••.•• SALTARELLI •. -./--- D I ED R I CH ) ...•.• SCH M I T. • . • • . . "'-== SVALSTAD) .••••• SCOTT........ ~ ) ----::;7 -GIBBS ••.•..•••. SH I PLEY •.••.• MC INNIS) ••.••• STORE •••.•••• -v--- STANTON) •.•.••• SVALSTAD •7• J. v1 == W 0 0 D ) • • • • . . • • • • • WARD • • • . i /;. -,~ . ..; ARB ISO) .•••.••••. WEISHAUPT ... -. -v--- DUNN[:) ••••••••.. WINN .•••.•••• v == WARD) ••.•.•••••• WOOD......... .t.. GRAHAM) ••••••••. YOUNG.. • • . • • • i/' == OTHERS HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS CLARKE TAYLOR BROWN I ' l_. WOODRUFF EWING HOHENER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY. LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVENS TRAVERS --../ --v -./- ---r- -./- J I.I' 1 _. MEET I NG DATE February 11, 1976 TI ME 7: 30 p. m. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7 & 11 . .. DISTRICT 1 RI MA. • • • • . • • 0.... ~DIEDR~CH) ...... BATTIN ..... ~==== .-. NS •••.••.••• GARTH E • • . • • ,__.._.. ~lTARP .... ~~SALTARELLI. 1" == == DISTRICT 2 LYONS·········· CALLAHAN ••• ~ ___ _ EWING .......... CHAPUT...... ....--- DIEDRICH) ...... CLARK ....... CS:----- GARTtfEl. ....... EVANS....... v--== - THO~) ........... KAYWOOD .... __!:::::::_ ___ _ FOX) ............ MAC KAIN... ~ ) --v---JACKMAN ....... PEREZ ....... _____ _ PERRY....... ........- !SVALSTAD) ...... SCOTT ....... ~== --DUNN~) •••••••••• WINN........ ~ __ == WARD) ••••••••••• W&&B~QO:\... ~ GRAHAM) •••••••• YOUNG ••••••• ~ == == DISTRICT 3 \O\(c.) (HOMRIGH~USEN). COX ......... ~ _j__ (COLLINS) ••••••• BYRNE •.••••. _~ ~ == CULVER .•••• ~~ __ ~GR I FF IN) •.•.••• BAVI & •••••••. ___JL: ~ __ GARTH EL ....... EVANS ....... ~ __ MAC KAIN) ...... FOX ......... __;L_ __ !NEV HJ .......... GRAHAM • .. • • v h _ THOM) ........... KAYWOOD .... ~~ __ SONJU) ••• \ ...... MAC LAIN ... --1.::::::. _DL __ BLACKMANJ •.••.•. MC KNEW .•.. ~ ~ __ OLSON....... a.----s_ __ ! D I ED R I CH ) •••••• SCH MI T ...... ~ a_. GIBBS) ••••.••••• SHIPLEY. ..•. ~~ STANTON) •••••.• SVALSTAD •.• _k=::::. N __ WOOD) ••••.•••••• ''6ARB.~A<=rc"' •• ~ r-_ __ ARB I SOL ....... WEISHAUPT.. v ~ __ DISTRICT 5 (RYCKOFF)) ...... MC INNIS ... _k""_. _ -·-· (DTEDRICH ...... RILEY ....... ~-·-__ _ ROGERS...... 0-___ _ DISTRICT 6 (MC INNIS) ...... STORE ....... ~ ___ _ (DIEDRICH) .••••• BATTIN. ••••. ~ ___ _ RIMA........ w ___ _ DISTRICT 7 (EVANS) ......... GARTHE ..... ~ L --(A"'T~ONY) ...•••. BURTON .••.• ~ .i__ -- (D-....tJR I CH) ...... CLARK...... 0... <L (MC INNIS) ...... B86TAL..... ~ ___}J_ == · GLOCKNER •.• ~ _Ji_ (PEREZ) ..••.••.•. JACKMAN.... ~ ___& == (SHARP) .......... SAL TA RELL I. __!::::::. -1{. __ DISTRICT li (DIEDRICH) •...•• .SCHMit-*"_. •. ~ ___ _ ( DUl<E.~~ .,......--___ _ Wil:DERl. ....... GIBBS ....... ~ ___ _ JOINT BOARDS DIEDRIC~) ...... BATTIN ....... ~_ ANTHONY ........ BURTON....... V' __ COLLI~S ........ BYRNE ........ ~ __ L VONS ...••••••. CALLAHAN ...•• ....k::::_ __ EWING . ")' •••••• CHAPUT ••.•••• ~ __ DIEDRICH ....... CLARK ........ 0- HOMRIGHAUS EN) .• COX. .••••.•••• ~ == · CULVER ••••••• ~-- !GR I FF IN) ........ BAVI S........ ~ MC INN Is L ..... BOSTAL ....... ---;:::::::--- GIBBS) .......... DUKE ......... .....J:::::::_ __ GARTHE) ......... EVANS........ ~ MAC KAINL ..... FOX .......... ~ -- (EVANS).········ ·GARTHE· • • • • • • ~ == (WI EDER).······· ·GIBBS········ l/'" __ GLOCKNER •••• ~ !NEVIL) •••••••••• GRAHAM....... .._...---== PEREf.) •••••••••• JACKMAN.. . • • • ~ · THO~) ••••••••••• KAYWOOD •••••• ~ __ FOX) ............ MAC KA IN • .. • V--__ SONJU) .......... MAC LAIN .... V' ~RYCOFF) ••••••••• MC INNIS: .... === == BLACKMAN) ...... MC KNEW...... v-__ 0 LS 0 N ........ .......L.c::::: ( J AC KMAN ) .••••••• PEREZ • • • • • • • • 1/' == PERRY........ ~ (DIEDRICH) •••••• RILEY •••••••. ~== RIMA ••.•••••• ~ __ ROGERS....... CL.> SHARP) .......... SALTARELLI .• ~ -- D I ED R I CH ) ...... SCH M I T. . . • • • • CL == SVALSTAD) ...... SCOTT........ v-- GIBBS) .......... SHIPLEY ••••.• ~ -- MC INNIS) ...... STORE ........ ___IL' -- STANTON) ....... SVALSTAD .... -1L.. == WOOD) ........... WA-Rf) ~t?~:t. . . v-' ARB ISO) ......... WEISHAUPT .••. V: -- DUNN ) .......... WINN ......... --lL. == GRAHAM)::::::::: YOUNG::::::::~ == OTHERS HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS CLARKE TAYLOR BROWN WOODRUFF EWING HOH EN ER . HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY. LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSOl'l PIERSALL STEVENS TRAVERS . . .. '-"" February 17, 1976 TO: Thomas L. Woodruff General Counsel MEMORANDUM COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 Section 12 of the Districts' Rules of Procedure for Meetings provides that voting on all resolutions shall be by roll call vote with certain exceptions. As you know, with the· exception of Districts 3 and 7, the Joint Chairman called for a voice vote for those Districts voting on i tern 12 (c) of the· agenda for February 11. Please advise as to how this should be recorded. in the minutes· for said item· and the certification of the vote for the respective resolutions. JWS:rb (6-a) (6-b) (6-c) 2/11/76 Joint Meeting Report of the Joint Chairman Regarding Advisory Committee of Locally Elected Officials to the SWRCB, said Committee has scheduled a meeting next Wednesday in Sacramento which will be attended by Wiri Adams and one of his SWRCB members, along with Supv. Rodney Diridon, Mayor Leonis Malburg, Councilman Lewis Nowell, him (Winn) and an elected representa- tive from East Bay Municipal Utility District. General Managers from other agencies will also be in attendance. Said they hoped to get this set up with goals and objectives and will be of interest to everybody in the State. Later in the meeting, Chairman Winn called an Executive Committee meeting for March 24, 1976 and invited Directors Culver and Svalstad to attend. The meeting was to discuss the compensation of the Joint Chairman. Report of the General Manager FAH referred to material in Directors' folders from SWRCB regarding Southern California Association of Governments. They have been designated as the "208" Planning Agency for the South Coast area. Reported that in discussing this designation with the SWRCB, the staff, as well as their members, were very much concerned. Did not feel that there was adequate testimony during the hearings to indicate that SCAG should be designated; however, Governer's office felt otherwise. In developing the conditions of designation, the State Board adopted some stringent requirements for SCAG. Gave SCAG 90 days to get their act together and come up with various contracts. Also must integrate the existing plans rather than start new ones. Referred to pages 4 & S and noted specific conditions where they are asking that there be submittals required of the designation from the variouS col.lllties as well as our Districts, SAWPA and NIWA. Said in discussions with SWRCB, they are going to be right here on this project. Think this is going to be a successful project the way it is outlined. FAH also reported that he had previously advised that he was one of three people working with the EPA people in Washington trying to develop a survey form to determine what the situation is on sludge throughout the U.S. Said he had a meeting last week in Washington and they decided to give the AMSA group a grant to develop a form. Finally gave up and asked AMSA to do it. Report of the General Counsel Woodruff advised that one of the subjects of concern for most Directors was the Conflict of Interest codes. Reported that Attorneys Committee of CASA met a couple weeks ago for a full day working on conflicts of interest. Said he thought they had developed a good code. Feel it is better than the code put out by the California League of Cities. Said once the Board of Supervisors sets the date for special districts in Orange County to file their code, we will come back to Board with single code (99% sure this will be a single code) that will cover both employees and Directors. Will forward to Board of .Supervisors sometime after April. Code is almost ready for consideration. Said regardless of what may be the Directors' requirements in their cities or for supervisors, as far as their action as a Director of the Districts, they need not file a report at this time. Also reported that the CASA Attorneys Committee has established a screening committee relative to the que stion of SB 90 reimbursements in the St a te. Wa s decided that aasically Committee would distribute information on items that were likely to affect other districts immediately. Re Jane Ayers land exchange, Woodruff reported on backgrolffid of e xchange and Mrs. Ayers request. Entered into negotiations and came back to Board last meeting. Mrs. Ayers has reviewed conditions and has indicated by letter and conversation with Woodruff that proposal is not acceptable. SAid he was not able to present a proposal that is ready for adoption. Are looking for some direction from Board if they are willing to adjust the offer. Said Directors had re~eived copies of Mrs. Ayers letter a nd his letter. Woodruff then review some of the conditions of the proposal. Svalstad then asked if City of Huntington Beach is given property on dedication, don't they do street improvements? Didn't know. Woodruff stated that one possibility was that she dedicate land and she pay for improvements; or project would be bonded, etc. ?? or in exchange for receiving right of way, City pays cost of improvements. Svalstad commented that there would not have to be a dedication of property right now. Woodruff then advised that street improvements are about to begin in frortof the Plant now. Will stop at northerly edge of Mrs. Ayers property so City probably has no plans to undertake widening at this point. Woodruff stated that the Districts haven't spent a lot of time discussing this with the City of Huntjngton Beach because the Districts would be i ncurring costs without an agreement. Svalstad then said that the point is that it would be hard for them to make a decision until they knew the answers to this. Why app roach the problem now if it is not a problem? Woodruff r eminded that the Directors indicated four months ago that the property exchange would be of equal value. Directors stated again they want to know policy of H.B. before they do this. Mrs. Ayers son, Ron Ayers, then spoke. Said they want the exchange to be equitable. Said they would take a net amol.ll1t of the square footage of Districts' land in exchange for theirs. Are willing to accept any cost of the improvements of the frontage that they will take. Said they are not requesting Districts to pay for it. Will assume responsibility once it has been dedicated. Said rezoning is their concern. Gibbs stated this is not a concern of the Sanitation Districts. Question asked who fil es the application--the District or the new buyer. Woodruff advised that we have told the City of Huntington Beach that we are improving the long reach of Brookhurst in front of Plant 2 and that this portion should a lso be improved. Said they have agreed to that. Winn asked for a motion . Ayers said they felt it was fair that the Districts assume the cost of rezoning since they are going to assume improvements. Woodruff said that since we are owners at present time, we could file application for zone change. Further stated that we are improving 4000 feet but have no obli ga tion to improve that 75 feet. Not realistically saving money by paying rezoning charges. Duke indicated he thought it would b e silly for Sanitation Districts to request this change. Saltarelli moved that if is reasonable for Di strict s, think we should pay fees and th ey pay improvements. Motion seconded. Chaput stated that if equal as far as appraised value, why should we pay extra . Don't understand. -2- Fox then stated that he objected to this. Not in original agreement. Saw no reason whatsoever that the District should apply for zone change when we have no need for zone change. Said Legal Col.Ulsel just stated that appraiser gave us an appraisal price based on these facts. Woodruff then said he would recommend that the Districts not request a zone change but agreement should be made contingent upon a successful z ~ne change. If it doesn't materialize, then deal can collapse. Would recommend that they be responsible for processing. Seemed most appropriate that they make the application. Saltarelli stated that he would include Woodruff's recommendation in his motion. (that they are responsible for processing zone change) Mrs. Ayers then spoke for a few minutes and told history of property. Little more discussion regarding zone change. Woodruff then restated motion: Said motion would be to direct staff and hjs office to effeGt an exchange of property between Jane Ayers and the Collllty Sanitation Districts subject to (1) Mrs. Ayers will file application with City of Huntington Beach for zone change. (2) District will ass1st in that application· (3) Exchange of property will be contingent upon Mrs. Ayers successfully obtaining rezoning. (4) Mrs. Ayers w~ll pay engineering costs for parcel map. (5) District will pay appraiser and legal fees. (6) Mrs. Ayers responsible for dedication and street improvements of City of Huntington Beach. Store said he was in support of that motion. Voice vote. Motion carried. Directors Duke, Gibbs and Shipley abstained from voting. CONSENT CALENDAR items removed (9-n) Svalstad asked for a point of information. Asked if we have the Engineer's certification that he agrees with this. Ray advised that the consulting engineer signs all changes. Item was moved, seconded and carried. (9-t) Jackman wondered if Reaches 14 -were those that tied in with 17 & 18. Asked if they weren't partially constructed. Also asked what the present need was for those lines. Decided to defer this discussion to the District 7 business at end of agenda. Moved & seconded to do so . (12-b) Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. Svalstad asked why do we go with 77-78 now with cost of living instead of just one year? Winn answered that the Executive Connnittee discussed this at length and felt it was in the best interest of the Districts. Svalstad then asked if we have any choice after one year to terminate this agreement. Woodruff said we can write the agreement any way . Said most professional services contracts do call for termination. Can write the contract for 3 years with right to cancel after one year but don't know if that would affect price. Perez agreed with Svalstad that we should have some clause for termination if we aren't satisfied. Also thought we should give other firms an opportllllity. Winn then directed Woodruff to put something into agreement to satisfy Directors. It was moved, seconded and carried to receive, file and accept proposal, as amended. -3- (12-c) Directors' compensation resolutions (1) Garthe moved adoption of Resolution No. 76-11-1. Motion seconded. (2) (4) (5) Woodruff briefly explained resolutions for District 1. Voice vote. One aye (Garthe) a nd two abstentions (Battin & Saltarelli) Motion failed. Saltarelli suggested that resolution be brought back to Board because he had conflic ting ins tructions from his council. Resolution 76-12-2 moved and seconded. Root read a couple comments from Director Wood who was absent. She said if this adopted, would make it possible for Joint Ch a irman to get $700 for two meetings and should not do this. Also should be $100 per month maximum. These were her comments not n ecessarily the views of the council. Root added that from his experience as a Director, there hasn't bee n too much effort to conduct separate meetings that have to be held . Voice vote. Joint Chairman a nnounced motion carried. Chaput and Perez indi cated no votes. Later under District 2 Other busines s (20) Chaput requested a roll call vote on this res olution because of the importance of the item. Was told it was up to District 2 Chairman to request it. Chairman Callahan refused to ask for roll call because the .action was already taken. Resolution 76-13-3 moved and seconded. McKnew said he was directed by his council to vote no. MacLain instructed by her council to do same. Svalstad said same. Will not adopt resolution. Shipley said he would abstain from this as he would not be on the Board any longer. Culver asked if he voted no did existing resolution provide for $50 per meeting or per month? Woodruff answered old r e solution is $50 per meeting -with ma ximum of $100 per month and new resolution $50 per meeting -with maximum of $200. Mcinnis stated that by doing nothing would keep resolution as it is . Present resolution does not address itself to payment for travel. Read suggested changes to Resolution 76-14-5. It was then moved and seconded to adopt this resolution as corrected by Mcinnis. Motion carried. Store moved that the maximum be changed to $100 per month. No second on that motion. No further action on that item. Resolution 76-15-6 not considered. (6) Resolution 76-16-7 moved and seconded. Roll call vote. Motion fail ed 4 against, 2 in favor, 1 abs·ent. RECESS from 9:42 -9:48. ALL DISTRICTS -Other business ?? Svalstad asked for some discussion on Joint Chairman's compensation. Joint Chairman referred this to the Executive Committee at their n ext meeting a nd invited Svalstad and Culver to a ttend. FAH s e t meeting for Ma rch 24. (16) Special Committee to Review Staff Procedures re Selection of Design Engineers Fox r eporte d that Connnittee had two meetin gs (for which they were not compensat e d). First meet ing consisted of some c oncerns and questions relative to co nsultants . Fo:ri\larded to staff with direction to come back to next Committee meeting and s how how some of these things could be impl e mente d into a selection program. All Directors receive d copies of recommendation. To date this is not a perfect document but pretty -4- J ('II • - good. Could be changed in six to nine months when reviewed at that time. Was moved and seconded to approve recommendations, with compliments. Store said he thought this was very impressive and very well done. Just had one question regarding envelope procedure. '!bought first envelope was standard procedure. Motion carried. (adopted procedures) Winn then mentioned that many of these special conunittees will not be appointed no'Clland will be taken up at Executive Conunittee. Said staff came up with this proposal. Stated that last month they voted an expenditure of $62~ million for staff and should reaffirm staff reconunendations. Reminded Directors that the staff was always available if they want any additional information. (28) DISTRICI' 5 -Irvine Ranch Water District letter Mc!nnis asked what we were going to do with it if we received & filed the letter? FAH said there isn't any adoptive policy of the Board. Mcinnis said to receive and file and ask staff to set up a meeting with District 5 and IRWD representatives to attempt to come up with reasonable set of conditions for possible annexation. Motion seconded. Burton asked if inquiry from IRWD to annex that area was to District 5. Also asked if any other Director could have opportunity to review this annexation at some future time? Woodruff said he didn't see any reason why ·not. Mc!nnis said he thought Burton's concern should be with IRWD and had no objection if he attended. Gordon Jones then spoke and advised that letter is not a request to annex. Letter is from consultant who is studying all the alternatives. of all potential methods. Merely trying to get information for study. Didn't see why City of Irvine would want to attend for that. (32-a) DISTRICI' 7 -OPA Burton said since we are short a full body and we canceled the previous meeting because of a lack of full body, wondered if it wouldn't be more reasonable to continue one more time until we get a full body. I Peggy introduced herself and stated that she agreed that this is an important action and that all Board members should be available. Saltarelli said if there is a quorum, should conduct action. Burton argued that he was all r e ady to attend another meeting but was canceled becaus e one member couldn't attend and didn't matter regarding a quorum then. Peggy then offered to give them a little bit more explanation whether they took action then or not. Jackman stated that they should decide whether to proceed or not before giving explanations. Burton the n a s ked Woodruff if motion was made for petitioners and ties and fails, was concerned that the failure would not give them an opportunity to come back, right? (don't know what Woodruff answered) Jackman moved to continue. Sa ltarelli seconded but said it was not beca use all members were not there. Chairman requested that it be taken up at next regular meeting of District 7. -5- (34) (9-t) (32) Cont. *** (33) DISTRICT 7 -Other business: Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer -Deferred from Consent Calendar Question was asked why are these reaches being built at this time? Conrad Hohener explained that these are master planned sewers and were scheduled for completion in 1975. Are nine months overdue. Said Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer relieves North Trunk Sewer which is at the present time flowing full. Will tie into side of Orange Sewer at Rio Vista and thereby relieving it. Further explained location of the Tustin-Orange and North Trunks and points that they tie in. Said sewer was to take care of future growth of District 7. Part of it is relieved without Reaches 15 & 16. Jackman asked again why we were building it at this time. Hohener answered that with anticipated growth, it has to be relieved at upper reaches. Asked it if could be postponed 6 months and Conrad said maybe 6 months. Then asked if it could be postponed for 6 years and he answered no, he didn't believe so. Jackman then asked if the growth matched the forecast and was answered yes. It was then moved to continue this item to the next regular meeting. Motion seconded. Burton asked if this presents any problem. REL advised that we are getting very competitive bids and felt if we defer to next meeting, wouldn't be too detrimental. Told of past bids that we under engineer's estimate. Said they have been preparing plans and specs according to schedule. Didn't think March would really be detrimental but beyond that would be. Saltarelli then withdrew his second to defer item and Jackman withdrew motion also. Said he just wanted some answers. Moved and seconded to approve plans and specs. Motion carried. Regarding item #32 again, Peggy McElligott strongly urged members of the Board to take action at the next regular meeting. Said she was a little concerned with all procedures and things that have to be filed with LAFC, here and the voters. The more delay the less chance of it going to happen. Perez suggested that the staff contact Directors prior to next regular meeting to get indication of whether all members could be present. Annexation policy resolution Saltarelli moved to approve . Motion seconded. Jackman moved to defer to next meeting as he thought it should be tied in with OPA. Saltarelli then withdrew his motion to app r ove. (Second did not withdraw.) Called for the question (o n Saltarelli's motion). Motion failed. Moved to continue to next r egular meeting. Seconded and carried. -6-