HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-02-11l
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
February S, 1976
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 1976, 7:30 P.M.
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
111e next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, Cal:lfoTnia, will
be held at the above hour and date.
_,f
~~7/J·rctary f l/
TELEPHDN ES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
-..... ;
MANAGER~s AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange Cou nty, California
JOINT BOARDS
February 11, 1976 -7:30 p .m.
Post OHice Box 8127
10844 El I is Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 7 1 4
540-2910
962-2411
The following is a brief explanation of the more important,
non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and wh i ch
are not otherwise self-explanatory . Warrant lis ts are not
attached to the agenda since they are made up i mmediately pre-
ceding the meeting, but will appear in the supplemental agenda
available at the meeting.
Joint Boards
No. 8 -Cl aims Processing Procedures .
On January 14, the Boards adopted a new 6 l aims processing
procedure whereby the staff is authorized to submit bills to the
County Auditor's office concurrently with the Dj.stricts ' biweekly
payrolls. We expect this procedure to be in effect sometime in
March . Presently, our invested funds mature the Thursday follow-
ing the Districts' Joint Board meetings; therefcre, the new pre -
cedures c annot be adopted immediately . We have not processed any
bills this month; therefore, a warrant listing is not included
with the mailed agenda material . A warrant list ing wi ll appear
in the supp l emental agenda material to be available at the meeting .
No. 9 -a -Award of Job No . J-9 -2 -Surge Tower No. 2
Extension at Treatment Plant No . 2.
Bids were received on this budgeted project on February
3rd. Four bids were received ranging from a low of $73 ,000 to
$107,000. The engineer's estimate was $11 5,000 (budget , $200 ,000).
It is recommended that the Boards accept the low bid submitted by
F. T . Zi ebarth Company of Fullerton in the amount of $73,000 .
No. 9-b -Award of Job No. PW-050 -Installation of Foul
Air Treatment at Plant No. 2 .
Bids were received on February 3rd for this facility to
treat the foul air from incoming sewers and at Headworks l!C" at
Plant No . 2 . Fourteen firms took out plans and specifications
for this project , but only two bids were received ($1 47 ,9 69 and
$159,200). The low bid was submitted by Skipper and Company of
Midway City. The engineer's estimate was $15 8 ,7 98 (budget ,
$150,000). The design engineer, Hugh Carter and Company , has
recommended the award of the contract to Skipper and Company and
the staff concurs .
No. 9-c -Agreement for Building Maintenance.
Bid s were taken Feb ruary 3rd f or a one -year building
maintenance contract. Five firms submi tted bids. The maintenance
bids r anged fr om $395 to $5~5 per month . It is the staff's recom-
mendati on that the award go to the apparent low bidder, Southeast
Janitorial Service, Anaheim . Since this s e rvi ce was not budgeted
in th e current year, a line item transfer will be necessary for
contract ed services in the Joint Operating Budget some time after
the thir d quarter of this year .
No. 9 -d -Authorization to Enter Into a Health Maintenance
Organiz ation Prepaid Medical Insurance Plan .
Presently, the Districts have two medical insurance p l ans
for th e Districts ' emp loye es . One plan is an HMO prepaid health
ma intenance plan which has been carried through the Family Health
Plan here in Southern California . In December, the carrier advi sed
that the premium for the existing coverage would be increased by
1 3%. As a result , we advertised for competitive bids and three
proposals were r eceived . It is the staff 's recommendation that
a 12-month contract be entered into with Security Health Plan , as
b eing the lowest bidder. We believe the plan submitt ed by this
company is superior to t he present coverage and will result in an
annual savings t o the District s of approximately $7 ,000 .
No. 9-e -Uniform Rental .
Seven bids were received t o supply uniforms and miscel-
l a neous . shop maintenance supplies for the coming 12 months . They
range from $1,167 .80 to $1 ,81 7.35 on a biweekly basis. I t is t he
staff 's r ecommendation that a Purc h ase Order contract be issued
to the low bidder, L & N Uniforms, Santa Ana , to supply the
specified services for the next 12 months . This is an 1 8% reduc tion
over current uniform rental rates .
No . 9 -f -Purchase of Four -Wheel Electric Carts .
For the past se v eral years , the Districts' staff has been
p~rchasing electric carts whic h are speci fi cally designed to be
utilized as service vehicles for personne l working within each
of the treatment plants. This avoids the purchase of larger trucks .
We fi nd that the maintenance of t h ese smaller vehicles is inexpensive
and yet , their carrying capacity is such that personnel can carry
adequate tools to do required work , thereby efficiently util i zing
their time. Three firms submitted bids a nd it is the s t aff 's
recomme n dation that a Purchase Order be issued for four electric
carts f rom the low bidder , Taylor-Dunn Man u facturing Company ,
Anah eim , in the amount of $9 ,378 .88 .
·-2-
No. 9-g -Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies
April Conference, Houston .
The Assoc i ation of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA),
is holding a 3-day nationa l conference ln Houst on , April 1 2
through 14. The meetin g will involve Washington EPA officials,
elected sanitation r epresentatives, and management personnel from
the 55 member agencies from throughout the United States.
The Districts' Ge n eral Manager wil l be attending under
authority previous l y given by the Boards in his capacity as
AMSA's Vice President and member of its Board of Direct ors . It
i s request ed that the Joint Cha irman be authorized to attend also.
No. 9 -h -Additional Te mporary Part-time Pos i tions .
At the October 1, 1 975 Joint meeting , the Board authorized
th e hiring of part-time technicians for the purpose of operating
the JPL-ACTS 1-MGD Pilot Plant 24 hours a day , seven days a week.
The wage scale for the tempor a ry personnel is $2 .50 to $7 .00 per
hour f or ten people . It will be necessary to increase the number
of part -time technicians to fifteen (87~% of this operating cost
is grant funded). It is the staff 's recommendation that Reso lution
No. 75-13 8 be amended to increase the authorization for part-time
tec hnicians from ten to fifteen .
District No . 2
No. 9-i -Change Order No . 2 to Contr act No . 2-15 -Yorba
Linda Pump Station
Change Order No . 2, in the amount of $1 4,816 .99 , is recom-
mended for the items described in the Change Order which were not
a part o f the original cont ract specifications . Included in this
Change Order is an item for approximately $9,000, necessitated by
the Southern California Edison Company's requirements that any
met ering structure shall have a vertical door . Because of recent
OSHA regulati ons , Edison has refu sed to supply serv ic e to the
Pump Station with the originally specified horizontal d oor for
entry into the station . Horizontal doors are installed on our
other pump stations; however, these regulations do not apply to
our e xisting facilities .
During the construct i on of certain on-site improvements
b y the University, some 1 600 cubic yards of materia l were removed
from the Pump Station site which was originally planned to be in-
c orporated in the landscaping i mp rovements adjacent to the Pump
Station . The University did not commit this material, but it was
included in our contract f or fill material . The contractor was
r equired to acquire addit ional ma t erial at a cost of $2,400 .
Because of difficulty in procuring certain valves and pumps
because of long (in excess of 18 months) delivery time, substitute
-3-
valv es were offered by the contractor and accepted by the Di strict
and the consulting engineer . This acceptance necessitated the
changing of the discharge manifold ~t the Pump Station and other
pipe fitt i ng operations costing $2,]85 ,37 .
Also included in this change order are two minor changes
the st af f feel s would aid in the maintenance and operation of the
Pump Station . These include the water proofing of th e brick wall
around the Pump Station and changes relative to the sensing
bubbler tube and station vent line s $197.68 and $449.83 respectively . '
It is the staff 's recommendation that Change Order No . 2
totaling $14,816 .99 be approved .
No. 9-j -Chan ge Order No . 2 to Co nt ract No. 2 -14 -4 -Santa
Ana River Interceptor.
Contractor has requested a change in contract sp ecificati ons
for the manhole shafts to ~e supplied on this contract. He has
r equested a change from precast shafts to cast -in-place sha ft s
at no additional cost to the District. This change will aid the
contract o r in his operation and at the same time, provide manholes
which are better from a structural and infilt ration standpoint .
This Change Order has been approved by the State Water Resources
Control Board.
The st aff recommends that this Change Order be accepted at
no cost to the District .
District No . 3
No . 9-m -Payment to City of Westminst er for Traffic Striping,
Contract No . 3-21-1.
Plan s and specifications for this reach of the Knott Inter -
ceptor extending fr om the intersection of Golden West and Westminster
Bou levard to approximately 1 000 feet southerly o f Katella Avenue
included the provision that the contractor would be re spons ible
for the p l acement of all t emp orary traffic striping. The permanent
traffic striping was to be performed by the City forces and · billed
to the District . This is a standard provision in most of the con-
tracts wherein the City would rath e r be directly resp onsible for
the restoration of the permanent traffic striping. The staff,
theref ore , rec ommends that the amount of $4,560.93 be authorized
for payment as invoiced by the City of Westminster .
No . 9-n -Change Order No. 4 to Contract No. 3 -20 -1 .
This recommended Change Order is the final adjustment in the
engineer 's quant ities which adds $2,517 to the contract price . Also
include d in this Chan ge Order is a time extension of 92 calendar
days for incleme nt weather in 1974, and pipe company labor strikes
which r esulted in legitimate delays to the contract or .
-4-
No. 9-o -Accepting Contract No . 3-20 -1, Knott Interceptor ,
as Complete.
This project, Reaches 5 and 6 of the Knott Interceptor, has
been complet ed in accordance with the plans and spec ifications .
The staff is recommending adoption of the standard resolution
authorizing the filing of the Notice of Completion and approving
the Final Closeout Agreement . The final cos t of this project is
$4,606,364.87 (original bid price, $4,602,992).
No. 9 -p -Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing
Bids for a Po rt ion of the Westside Relief Intercep tor , Contract No .
3-21-2 .
Pl ans and specifications for this regularly -budgeted con-
struction project are now ready for bid . This project c ommences
at the intersection of Katella Avenue and Lex ington Drive in the
City of Los Alamitos, and proceeds northerly in an easement to b e
acquired to Cerritos Avenue, thence northerly in Denni Street to
Orange Avenue, thence easterly in Orange Avenue to Moo d y Street,
northerly in Moody Street terminating at Crescent Avenue in the
City of La Palma. The staffs of the Cities of Lo s Alami t o s,
Cypress and La Palma have been consulted re garding the alignment
and the construction conditions associated wi th the project .
Special conditions were discu ssed in detai l in the Preliminary
Engineerin g and the Environme ntal Impac t Report s pTepared for this
pro je ct. The interceptor is approximately 15 ,650 feet in length
and the pipe size ranges from 30-inch to 15-inch in diameter . The
engineer 's estimate for this proj e ct is $1,177,0 00 .
It is recommended that the General Manager be authorized to
establish the bid date for this project up on receipt of right of
way easements for the alignment through private property from
Katella to Cerritos .
No . 9-q -Acquisition of Easements f or Contract No . 3 -21 -2.
The Resolution appearing in the agenda authorizes cond emn ation
of rig hts of way for the construction of the Wests i de Re l ief Inter-
ceptor between Katella and Crescent Avenues a d istance of 2600 f eet .
The permanent easements will v ary in widt h from 10 to 20 feet . The
tempora ry construction easemen ts will vary from 30 to 55 feet .
The staff and General Counsel ar e n egot iating the acquisi t ion
with the two affec ted property owners; how ever , if we are unab le to
come to satisfactory t erms, condemnation of the necessary rights of
way will be re quired .
-5-
No. 9-r -Auth o rization to Pay for Chan ge Order .to Flood
Con t rol Di strict for Anaheim-Barber City Channel -Westmins ter
Avenue Culvert.
In January , 1 9 75, the Board approved a uti lit y rel oca tion
agreement with the Orange County Flood Control District for the
purpose of r elocating a sewer siphon in Westminster Avenue at
the crossing of t he Ana heim Barber Flood Control Channel . The
plans and specifications for the siphon relocation were included
in the Flood Control District's channel widening contract fo r a
maximum cost to District No. 3 of $60,500 . The District's cost ,
based on the actual contract amount , was $52,500 . During con-
struction, it was discovered that the Distri ct 's sewe r siphon
was not constructed as shown on the p l ans. To better accomplish
the relocation , which included bypassing of the sewage , the
District awarded a separate contract in the amount of $7,400 to
accomplish this . Because of delays and changed conditions, the
Flood Co ntro l District 's contractor sustained additional costs
and submitted claims to the Flood Control District in excess
of $28 ,0 00 . The Flood Control District 's eng ineers, along with
the District 's staff , has negotiated this Change Orde r with the
Flood Control District's contractor and have mu tual l y agreed
upon a lump sum settlement of $5 ,0 00 .
It is the staff 's recornmendation that the Board approve
this $5,000 change order to be paid i n acc ordance with the provi-
sions of the utility relocation agreement . The total cost to
the District for the reloc atio n wi l l be $62 ,900.
Distr ict No. 5
No . 9-s -En gineerin g Services for Back Bay Drive Trunk
Sew er , Contract No . 5 -20 .
Pur suant to the Board 's instructions, the staff has nego -
tiated. with Simpson-Steppat for the preparation of plans and
specifications for the cons truction of the Back Bay Drive Trunk
Sewer (East Side) which extends from the e ntrance to the Dunes
Park along the easterly side of the Back Bay and along a r i ght
of· way in Big Danyon to Jamboree Road, terminating at the
Distri ct 's Jamboree Pump Station .. This relief sewer is necessary
to a lleviate the overloaded pumping station . It is contempla ted
that construction of th is need ed facilit y will commence this
f all and be completed by spring of 1977 . Th e proposal from
Simpson-Steppat is included in your agenda mate ria l and the
staff recommends approval.
District No. 7
No. 9-t -Approval of Plans and Spec i fications for Tustin-
Orange Trunk Sewer, Contract No . '{-6-9.
Th e Di st rict's Master Plan report adopted in 1969 , a long
-6-
with the preliminary engineering report and the Environmental
Impact Report for the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer considered by
the Boards in March, 1974, projected the construction of the
Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer extendin~ from the intersection of
Mitchell and Red Hill to the northerly terminus in Santiago Canyon
Road near the intersection of Linda Vista Street in the City of
Orange . Two segm e nts of this trunk sewer have been ~onstructed
(7 -6 -6 and 7 -6-7), terminating at the intersection of Fairhaven
Avenue and Esplanade Street . At the last Board meeting in
January, 1976, the Board awarded the contract for Job No . 7-6-8
which extends the Tustin-Or a n ge Trunk Sewer from the intersec tion
of Fairhaven Avenue and Esplanade Street to Santiago Boulevard
and Spring Street.
Contract No. 7 -6 -9 will complete the Tustin-Orange Trunk
Sewer from the intersection of Santiago Boulevard and Spring
Street to the intersection of Santiago Canyon Road and Linda
Vista Street.
It is recommended that the Board approve the plans and
specifications and establish the bid date for receipt of bids
on this project as March 30th (engineer 's estimate, $410 ,000).
"-·!,,·
No . 9-u -Right-of-Way Document Mapping for Di strict No . 7
Trunk Sewer Easements.
The staff requested proposals from four civil engineering
firms to update and verify our records pertaining to our rights
of way and to validate our easement documents relative to all
trunk sewer and pumping station fac ili ties . Since the work in-
volved litt le professional judgment, the staff felt competitive
pric e bidding was in order for the work as outlined . The lowest
and most responsible proposal was that submitted by Shelton &
Associates in an amount not to exceed $9 ,.527 .50 , which is approxi -
mately $6 ,000 les s than the fee submitted b y the next lowest
bidd er (budget , $35,000).
It is the staff 's r ecommendation that the Board autho r ize
the firm of Shelton a nd Associates, land surveyors and engineers
from Huntington Beach, to prepare the necess ary documents as .
required to update a nd validate District No. 7's rig h t -of-way
records.
No. 9 -v -Request for Annexation .
The Di stric t has r eceived a formal re ques t for annexation
of 1.3834 acres in the vicinity of Amapola Street and Handy Creek
in the Orange Park Acres area . It is r ecommended· that the request
be referred to staff for a report and recommendation to the Board .
-7-
No . 9 -w -Final Approva l of Annexation No . 47 .
Th ~s it em appearing in your agenda orders the annexation
o f 1.002 acres to the District in the vicinity of Rangeview
Dr ive and Brier Lane . The Board authorized initiation of pro -
c eedin g s for annexation in June, 1975 . The Local Agency
Formation Commission 's approval has been received and the
proponent has paid the re qu ired fe es . It is the staff's recom-
mendation that Resolut i on No. 76 -38-7 be approved .
Di strict No . 11
No. 9-x -Approval of Plans and Specifications for
Manhole Replacement and Repair -Contract No. 11-lR-l .
The staff has prepared the plans and bidding sp ecifica-
tions for the replacement or repair of 35 det e riorated manhole s
on the Newland -Delaware Trunk . The manhole shafts on t his trunk
have sustained various degre e s of corrosion due to sulfide attack
(budgeted maintenance item of $70 ,000).
Al l Districts
Nos . 1 1 and 12 -Report of the Executive Comm i tt ee and
Recommen dation s on the Committee's Report .
Th e Committee met on January 27th and enclosed for the
Directors is ·a written rep o rt of their discussions and recommend ed
i t ems for consideration by the Boards.
No. 13 -Transfer of Intere st in Power Line Between Plants.
I ncluded in the agenda supporting material is a staff report
recommending the transfer of the Districts ' interest in a 12 KV
3-phase power line betwe en Plants 1 and 2 to the Southern California
Edison Company. The staff is recommending transfer of the facilities
for $11,500 and other consid erat ions.
No . 14 -Forma l Authorization for Application for F ederal
and State Construction Gra nt s .
Each year, it is ~ec essa ry for the Districts to adopt
r esolutions authorizing the execution and filing of documents
necessary for applications for Federal and State construction
grants . Th i s authority covers the 1975-76 fiscal year .
No . 15 -Purchase of Needed Machinery .
The staff ha s been searching for a us ed , long-b ed lathe to
be used in our maintenance shops for repair and modification of
d rive lines , pump sha fts and other sp ecialty equipment related t o
wastewater treatment mecha nisms . We are requ es ting autl1ority to
-8-
p u rchase a u sed 27 11 by 2 4' lathe fr om the Thomas J. Rush Company
of Buena Park for an amount not to exceed $10,000 . Included i n
t he agenda suppor ting material i s an evaluation report .
No. 1 6 -Ve rbal Report of Special Committee .
The Special Comm i ttee to Review Staff Procedures Relative
t o the Selection of Design En g ineer s will meet Thursday evening ,
F ebruary 5th , to consider recommended procedures to be used in
the se l ection of consulting engineers . The Chairman of the Committee
will make a verbal r epo rt to the Boards on the Cqmm i ttee 's progress .
District No . 5
No . 28 -Conditions for Annexation of Territor y between
Newport Beach and Lag una Beach.
A l etter has been received from the Irvine Ranch Water
Di str i c t requ est in g condi t ions fo r annexat i on of unincorporated
I rvine Company coastal p r operty .
No . 29 -Hearing on Pr opos ed Ordinance No . 509 .
. Pur suant t o the Board 's direction, the General Counsel has
prepared Ordinance No . 509 amending Section 402 of Ordi nance No .
508, increasing the District connection charges to be comparable
with the established connection charges in Districts Nos . 2 , 3, and
7 . The pres ent District No. 5 connection charges are $175 for
single family dwellings and $90 per 1000 sq . ft ., for new con-
struction other than fami l y dwellings . The new ordinance will
increase the connection charge to $250 per family dwelling unit and
$130 per 10 00 .sq .. ft., of floor area for new construction other than
family dwelling units. Notices of the hearing for Ordinance No . 509
h ave been s e nt to all permit holders a nd interested persons and
public entities affected by the propos ed change .
District No . 7
No . 32 -Fu rther Consideration of the Proposed Annexation of
Oran ge Park Acres .
A special meeting of the District Board was scheduled f or
February 4th to consider the requested annexation of the Orange
Park Acres area to th e District . Because of s everal meeting
conflicts, the special meeting was not held and the matter was
continued to February 11th . The fol l owing is the staff 's eva lua-
t ion of the Orange Park Acres annexation proposal dated January 28 ,
1 976 :
-9-
Election Re: Annexation and Improvement District General
Obligation Bonds $1 ,141,000 ± ·
Essentially, the p ro ponents are proposing the formation
of an Improv emen t District to j_ssue general obligation
bonds followin g a successful annexation/bond election
(2/3 majority) in the amo unt of $1,141,000 . The bond pro -
ceeds will acquire "r ight of service and use of the
District's existing facilitiesn which are equal to the
ann exa tion f ees $455 ,4 00 , payment of $671 ,684± for the
necessary Master Plan Trunk Sewers , Reaches 17 and 18 ,: to
serve the area , and $15 ,000 reimbursement of advances by
proponents of the annexation proceedings .
Prep aid Connection Charges for Parcels Within Proposed
Annexation
Each existing parcel within the annexed area as of the
dat e of the elect ion will be credited with one connection
charge ($2 50 ) at the time the property is hooked to the
sewer. (42 5 parcels x $250 per connection equals $106,250).
Any division of land after the date of elect ion will
result in the property owners obligation to pay additional
connection charges .
Installation of Lo~al Sewers
The property owners will construct the local collector
sewers either by cash financing or. by assessment proceedings .
Reimbursement of Funds Related to Master Plan Subtrunk System
Funded by Bond Issue
As a condition of the general obligation bond proceedings,
the Sanitation District will contribute, from District -wide
collection of connection charges, funds felated to the subtrunk
system funded by the bond issue $671,684 -, minus thf prepaid
connection charges $106 ,250. These f unds, $565,234 -which
will only be payable upon receipt of connection charges , will
b e deposited in the Improvement District Bond and Interest
Redemption Fund , subjec t to previously authorized Master Plan
reimbursement agreements . The proceeds deposited in the Bond
Redemption Fund will be used for the purpose of retiring bonds
in advance of maturity or for payment of both bond principal
and interest when due .
-10-
·'
. '
Tax Rate to Retire Improvement District Bonds
This is the staff's projection of the annual debt service
for the issuance of $1,141,000 gene ral obligation bonds for
the Orange Park Acres 550 acre annexation.
Annual Debt Servi ce -7 percent, 15-y ears $125,300
Annual Improvement District Tax Rate
(a) March, 1975 assessed value = $5,465,000
(b) Tax Rate $125,300 = $5,465,000 ~ 100 $2.2928 per $1 00/A .V .**
Annual County Sanitation District No. 7 tax rate
= $0.4026 per $100/A.V.
Total Annual Tax Rate = $2 .6954 per $100/A.V.
** This tax rate will be' reduced by District connection charges
collected and transferred to the Improvement Bond and
Inte rest Redemption Fund equal to $564,234± during the life
of the bonds.
No. 33 -Adjustment of Current Annexation Fee .
Effective July 1, 197 5 , all Districts adopted a uniform
annexation fee policy. The annual annexation fee equa ls each
District's assets minus its .liabilities which is the net worth,
divided by the number of acres within the District. Therefore,
based on this formul a , the District's staff has quoted an annexa-
tion fee for District No . 7 in the amount of $1 ,0 29 per acre .
During a recent review of the ca lcul ations , we find that
the co llection system figures include $3 .6 million for local sewers
such as assessment district sewers and l ocal sewers within tracts.
Therefore, the staff recommends that the Board authorize an adjust -
ment of the annexation fee to $828 per acre, the reby eliminating
the inclus ion of local collection systems which have no bearing
on the costs of the District's Master Plan system and treatment
works.
-11-
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
II
COAl1DS OF DlfU~CYOl~S
County Snnifation Di5trids
of Oronge County, California
JOINT BOARDS
MEETING DATE
FEBRU.4RY JJ, 1976 -7 :.30 P )1.
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) . Roll Call
Pest Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 9270i
Telephones:
Area Code 71 4
540~2910
.. 962-2411
AGENDA
ADJCURr~;.:ar1s POSTED.::-:-
co::;p & L~IL:J.~E .... ~ ... .
FILES ~::T ~;?., ...... ~ .... .
RES.::Lu::·~;:s CER~IFiED.~
LEITE~:; ',·,:;:-;T::i( .... ~ .....
M!Nu;;::.; \'/~;F:::i~ ... fi!':".: •••• ~
MINUTES mm ...... ~ .. ..
~~~J./
Fll.E -·~--~I .. -( 3 ) #,\-~ Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary ~ ~-.
lffil:;~ ·········--
. \:l: ,,_ ~
A/C •... TKLR -~(..44~)-_jc~o~nq..As:;.;;i'"""cluc~r:::.r:iai.+t4i~o~n~o~f_,mfH-I03-:it~i~o*nr-tt'.--AOi-Tre-c~eeP.-1:;.::i· '~{c~aH=Rk=a'-"*f'4-i-+1.P.e--TRm+iR~UH"t;:...c~e:..:i;utc~e~ey~t~s-, -+i ~f-ia~H~)~·.
See supplemental agenda ~ Ot4-~ • ~ ~
....... ·-···········•••'!•'
(5) EACH DISTRICT
Considera.tion of motions approving minute~ of the following meetings,
as maile·d:
;n/s District 1 January 14,
M/.5 District 2 January 14,
!J1/'5 District 3 January 14,
M/5 District 5 January 14,
.IV/ /5 District 6 January 14,
r11/ ~ District 7 January 14,
February 4,
/f//S Distri~t 11 January 14,
FILE.·················· (6)
LETTE~ •••••••...•.••
ALL DISTRICTS
Reports of:
A/C .... TKLR ....
,~E ~ •• :.~~fl. -...:_-·-·-·\l·-
LETTER ••••••••••••••
A/C .•.. TKLR ..•..
J~~~ .... :!..~.;~;;.: t
......_ .. _ •••••• -. •• m ..
Joint Chairman
General Manager
General Counsel
1976 regular
1976 regular
1976 regular
1976 regula.r
1976 regular
1976 regular and
1976 special
1976 regular
(7) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of mo tion to receive and fi le certification of the
Gen e ral Man age r that he has checked all bills a ppearing on the agenda ,
found th em to be in order, and that he recomm e nds authorization for
paymen t
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
(8)
ROL L CAL L YOTt .....• ",, .. ..-
IT:Ms ON
SUi'FL[},I El-liAl AG ~NDA
Con si deration of rol l cal l vote motion approving Joint Operating
an d Capita l Out l ay Re vo l ving Fund accounts payable check registers
for signature of t h e Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing
p ayme n t of c laims listed on page "I" ; and a pproving accounts
payable check r egi s t e rs for s ignature of the Chairman of t he
respective Dist rict , and a uthori zing paymen t of sai d claims l iste d
on t h e page s indica ted below:
DISTRIG-r--l-\~b~"".t."tttrt-s,--:i.4'.-a.-R~ .••...................... NON E
DISTRICT 2 warrants -See page "II"
DI STRICT 3 warrants -See page "II"
8-I-&HH-G:rS 3 & 11 suspense fund 11arrants, if any ..... NONE
DISTRIC T 5 warrants -See page "II"
BI-s:r--RICTS 5 & 6 suspense fund warrants, if a~ ..... NONE
BISTRICT-6 ',;arrents, if any •........................ NONE
"III " DISTRICT 7 warrants -See p a ge ------
DISTRICT 11 warrants -Se e page "II I "
(9) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT .CALENDAR
Roll Call Vote or Cas t
Unanimou3 Ballot
ITEMS NOS I 9 (A). THROUGH 9 ( x )
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered
as not r equiring discussion or further exp lanation and
unless any particular item is requested to be removed from
.the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member
of the public in a ttendance, the re will be no separate
discussion of th ese items. All items on the consent
calendar will be enacted by one ac tion approving all motions,
and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on
the consent calendar. All items r emoved from the consent
calendar shall be considered in the regular orde r of business.
Members-of the public who wish to remove an item from the
cons ent cal endar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from
the consent calendar. h ~ -\'
Consideration of action to a pprove all agenda items appearing
on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same.
-2-
. (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
@./ ....... '::: ........ .
~-LETTE~ •• ecc.::
A/C .... TKLR;/
,:=_-~t~~:
G!.iJ' -~ ..... -:-.: ........ .
Ciei~R":).v.::.
A/C •••• TK~
·-~···········
~/ .. !:. ............ .
LETTERS ... ~ .... .
A/C .... TKLR .. ..
~~~-~-:'~
'~:.:":---····
FILE ·······~·-·
LETTER5 ••• .JL ....
A/C .... TKLR ••••
~. •. ll_, , .... ,--~ •. \, ----,,.--~---·---J
FILE ••• Jc. .....
LETTER .•.••••••••.••
A/C .... TKLR ---
'°:i --·~ / --r-~-=-1-~-
FILE ···-·············
LETTER •••..•.•....•.
A/C .•.. TKLR •...
Fi LE •••••.•.•...•....•
LETTER •••.••.•...•••
A/C .... TKLR ••••
-----·-·······••"-lo"loii'S:'\
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-20, to receive
and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding
contract for Surge Tower No. 2 Extension at Treatment Plant
No. 2, Job No. J-9-2, to F. T. Ztcbarth Company, in the
amount of $73,000.00. See page "A"
(b) Consideration of 0tmrda1d Resolution No. 76-21, to receive
and file bid tabulation and rcco1runendation, and awarding
contract for Installation of Foul Air Treatment at Plant
No. 2, IIeadworks 11 C11 , Job No. PW-050, to Skipper & Company,
in the amount of $147,969.00. See page 11 B"
(c) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-22, to receive and file
bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for
Administration Building Maintenance, Specification No. PW-051,
to Southeast Janitorial Service, in the amount of $395.00 per
month. See pages "C" and "D"
(d) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-23, to receive and file
bid tabulation and recommendation for HMO Prepaid Medical
Insurance Plan, Specification No. I-010, and authorizing the
General Manager to execute an agreement with Security Health
Plan to provide HMO Prepaid Medical Insurance Plan effective
March 1, 19 76. See pages "E" and "F"
(e) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation
and recommendation for Specification No. P-023, Uniform
Rental (pants, shirts, lab coats, coveralls, shop rags,
protective door mats and mops), and authorizing the General
Manager to issue a purchase order contract to L & N Uniform
Supply in accordance with the unit prices contained in their
proposal therefor. See page . "G"
(f) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation
and recommendation and award purchase of Four (4) 4-Wheel
Electric Cars, Specification No. A-081~ to Taylor-Dunn
Manufacturing Company, in the amount of $9, 378. 88. See
page "H"
(g) Consideration of motion authorizing the Joint Chairman to
attend the Annual Conference of the Association of Metropolitan
Sewerage Agencies in Houston Texas, from April 12 -14, 1976;
and authorizing reimbursement for travel, lodging, meals and
incidental expenses incurred
(h) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-24, amending Resolution
No. 75-138, establishing temporary part-time technician
classification, increasing said authorized personnel from a
maximum of 10 to a maximum of 15 employees. See page "I"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
f;LE .••••.••••••••••••
L':TI"ER .•..••••••••••
A/C .... TKLR ••••
FILE ..••••.•.•.•••.•••
LETTER ·······-····
A/C •... TKLR ••••
FIL~···············-
LETIER V-~---··
A/C •••. TKLR --
Fl~E _······-·--------··
~--~---
A/C .... TKLR ••••
...-..····-··-···-
FILE ·······-··---
LETTER···-
A/C .... TKLR -·
---~-~1-..':: ... _
FILE •....•..•••.••••••
LETTER ···-······-
A/C •••• TKLR ....
FILE .•..••.••.••••••••
. . ----r~. -rJ"' .• .. -• )'-\ . ' ":t:: (l~~~R')I.'.'.!.~ •• ~ •• ~!.' '-'
~-~~&:-~ ·-·-·----·--·-·---
DISTRICT 2
(i) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to
the plans and specifications for Yorba Linda Pump Station,
Contract No • .2-15, authorizing an addition of $14,816.99
to the contract with J. Putnam Henck, a Corporation, and
Henck Pro, a Joint Venture, for additional work,
and approving a time extension of 66 calendar days to
accomp I ish said work. Sec page "J"
(j) Consideration of notion approving Change Order No. 2 to
to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor
Sewer, Reach 5, Contract No. 2-14-4, authorizing a change in
construction of manholes to the contract with Kasler Corporation
and L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc., at no cost to the District.
See page "K"
DISTRICT 3
(k) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and
Complaint for Damages, Personal Injuries and Property
Damage in Case No. 240551, Barbara Roberts aka Barbara
Smith vs. Sully-Miller Contracting Company, et al.,
relative to the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 & 6, Contract
No. 3-20-1, and refer to the District's General Counsel
and liability insurance carrier for appropriate action
(I) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of
Darryl Nasser, dated January 19, 1976, in the amount of .
$100,000.00, in connection with construction of the Westside
Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 and Portion of 27,
Contract No. 3-21-1, and refer to the contractor and
District's liability insurance carrier for appropriate
action
(rn) Consideration of motion authorizing payment of an amount not
to exceed $4,560.93, to the City of Westminster, for work
performed in restoring permanent pavement markings on Goldenwest
and Westminster Avenue in connection with construction of the
Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 & 6, Contract No. 3-20-1
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the
plans and specifications for the Knott Interceptor, Reaches
5 & 6, Contract No. 3-20-1, authorizing an adjustment of
engineer's quantities for a total addition of $2,517.00 to
the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting Company, and
approving a time extension of 92 calendar days due to inclement
weather and labor strikes which resulted in delays in pipe
deli very to contract. See page "L" -----
Consideration of Resolution No. 76-34-3, accepting Knott
Interceptor, Reaches 5 & 6, Contract No. 3-20-1, as complete;
authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving
Final Closeout Agreement. See page "M"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5)
-4-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4)
FILE ·······-··-····· ---------~ .... ~ ~ffil.?.~.'' 0-
L ¥ .... TKLR .•..
~J..J.~-~
_Q~~~?..:.k.::::
FILE--~··· ---
LETTER ...........••.
A/C •••. TKLR ••••
-~-~-f~-~~--~-~-
FILE •••.••.••.••••••••
LETTER ••••••••••••••
A/C .... TKLR ••••
·--~rr-~---···
. Fi LE .•• v..: ....... --
~ f L LETTER ···········-·
A/C .... TKLR ....
==~~~=
FiLE .......•........•.
LETTER .••.•..•••.•••
A/C •••• TKLR .-:/°
~--~·-7· ~ .. :. ........ .
. Fil.E .: . ..k::.. •..•• _
'~-ETTER ~--~.b ..
AIK_ •... TKLR ••••
...E~f--~---··
·;::-~-........ ./{' ( • ... b ~·I.' ___ ·+····u; ... ._.
LETTER ·······-··-
A/C ~¥
~ FILE ..•.•.•.....••••••
C..-~~_TTER·· •• : •• J::.:.~_
A/C •••• TKLR •.•.
.... _··-······"······.:..: ..
pISTRICT 3 (Continued)
(p) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-35-3, approving plans and
specifications for Westside Relief Interceptor, Portion of
Reach 27 and Reaches 28 and 29 (from Katella & Lexington Drive
to Crescent Avenue), Contract No. 3-21-2, and authorizing the
General Manager to establish the bid date upon acquisition of
necessary right of way. See page "N" '-~~,,I "1'1(., ~ ~EL.
t>Jj~~
(q) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-36-3, authorizing and
directing the condemnation of certain-real property situated
in the County of Orange, State of California, in connection
with construction of the Westside Relief Interceptor, Portion
of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 and 29 (from Katella & Lexington
Drive to Crescent Avenue), Contract No. 3-21-2. See page
(r)
''0"
Consideration of motion authorizing payment of $5,000.00 to
the Orange County Flood Control District for additional
work incurred in connection with the Utilities Relocation
Agreement relative to the District's Westminster Avenue
Interceptor Sewer Siphon under the Anaheim-Barber Flood
Control Channel
DISTRICT 5
(s) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal
of Simpson-Steppat, dated February 4, 1976, for preparation
of plans and specifications for the Back Bay Drive Trunk
Sewer (East Side), for a lump sum fee of $34,000.00
See page ''P"
DISTRICT 7
~Consideration of Resolution No. 76-37-7, approving plans and
specifications for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion of
Reach 14 and Reaches 15 and 16, Contract No. 7-6-9, and
authorizing advertising for bids to be received on March 30.
~ See page "Q"
(u) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal
of Shel ton & Associates, dated January_ 30, 1976, for right-of-way
document maps and reco.rds for the District's trunk sewer facilities,
on a per diem fee basis for an amount not to exceed $9,527.50 •
See page "R"
(v) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from
Eugene St. Amand for annexation of approximately 1.38 acres
of territory to the District in the vicinity of Amapola Street
and Handy Creek, and refer to staff for study and recommendation.
See page "S"
(w) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-38-7, ordering
annexation of approximately 1.002 acres to the District in the
vicinity of Rangeview Drive and Brier Lane (Proposed Annexation
No. 47 -Rauch Annexation to Colll1ty Sanitation District No. 7)
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6)
-5-
(9) (CONSENT CJ\LENDJ\R continued from page 5)
-·-·-
~ ( FILE --·---~---· \._..--
LETIER ••..•.......••
A/C •••• TKLR ••••
~v ____ ......................... .
DISTRICT 11
(x) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-40-11, approving plans and
specifications for Manhole Replacement and Repair, Contract
No. 11-lR-l, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received
on March 2, 1976. See ·page "T" "
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
(11)
M~
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive
and file the Committee's written report
-6-
? •
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Fl l E ···-·······"'""·
lETIER ............ ..
Consideration of action on items recomr.i ended by the Executive
Committee:
A/C •.•• TKLR •••• (a)
--·-················· Roll Call Voto or Cast
0 ... ~ ... --··-················· Unan imou s Ba~lot S
LETIER ~-~.v (b
A/C •••• TKLR ...•
~-\.:·--·~·--
Consideration of Resolution No. 76-32, amending Resolution
No. 75-168, Rules and Regulations re Conditions of Employment,
incorporating procedures for Layoff and Disciplinary Actions
See page "U"
Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., dated January 20, 1976, to prepare
annual audits for the 1975-76, 1976-77 and 1977-78 fiscal years ,
for an annual fee of $14,000.00 with p r ovision for escalat ion for
the years ending 1977 a nd 1978. See page "V" a.c ~
r.~E ··················
~Further consideration of the following resolutions establishing ~compensation and reimbursement for expenses for Directors, and
repealing existing resolutions for same:
"? ~onsideration of motion to receiv~ and file Resolution No.· 842 LETTER ....•....••.••
A/C .•.. TKLR •.•• trEMS 0 ~ of the City of Yorba Linda opposing adoption of Sanitation
~t!DPffMrnTAl AGENDA Districts' resolutions establishing compensation and reimbursement
for expenses for Directors.
FILE ................••
LETTER .•..•.•...•.••
A/C .•.. TKL R •.••
FI LE ................•.
LETTER ···-·······-
A/C .••• TKLR ...•
FILE °'::.":.::::·.:::::·.:·:·····-·
LETTER
A/C .•.. TKLR ...•
-·-··-···········-··-··
···-·····F·lff ··::::::: .......... .
LETTER ............. .
(1)
Roll Call Vo te or Cast
Unanimous Ballot
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Unanimous Ballot
(2)
f\\ \S
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Una nimous Ballot
(3)
I\\ s
A/C ..•. TKLR •... Roll C•ll Vote or Cast
···-··-········-········ Un animous Ballot
FI LE .••.............•. (4)
LETTER •............. W\ \S
Roll Call Vote or Cast
A/C ••.. TKLR ···· Unan imous Ballot
.................
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of Resolution No. 76-33-1, fixing compensation
for its Directors and rescinding Resolutions No s. 63-128
and 68-3-1. S e e page "W"
. OR
DISTRICT 1 -(1\5:), ~ ~ ( ~ ~)
Consideration of Re so1Utfon No. 76-11-1, establishing the
compensation and expe nse reimb urs eme nt policies fo r its
Directors, and repealing Resolutions Nos. 63-128 a nd 68 -3-1
See page "X" ~ "\ ~~ ~ -~N-~Q.
to 3}t """
DISTRICT 2 •Ok:,
Consideration of Res olution No. 76 -12-2, establishing the
comp e nsation and expense reimbursement poli cies for its
Directors, and rep ea li~g Resolution No. 73 -4~~-r->.-~--~-~
See page ''X'' ~~.~.~~~ ~~o..Uu.&::\:J..Mll~~-~~,,.C )., ()V
DISTRICT 3 -i:,F;. \)· . --~ •
Consideration of Resolutio n No. 76-13-3, e stablishing the
comp ensation and expense reimbursement po licies f or its
Directors, and r epea ling Resolution No. 73-48-3
Seepage "X" ~~~. ~.
DISTRICT 5
Consid e"ation of Resolution No. 76-14 -5 , establishing t he
compensation an d expense r e i mb ursement po l i cies for its
Directors, and r ep e aling Resolution No. 73-51-5
See page ''X'' Q)I ~ -~ ~
FILC:::::: .......... _
LE TTER ·············-
A/C .... TKLR ··-
IV\I (5) DISTRICT 6 -~ ~ -~ ~ £..A.A.4..i
. Con s ide ration of Reso lution No. 76 -1 5-6 , estab li shing the
Roll Call Vote or Casi t · d · l · 1 · · f · Unanimo us Ball ot • comp ensa ion an expense re1 m1urseme nt: po ic:i.es ·or its
(6)
f\I\\ s
LETIER ·············-Roll C~I/ Vote or Cas t
FI LE .••.............•.
A/C ..•. TKL R ·--Unan imo~~ 8al 1ot
Dir ec tors, a nd repeal ing Resol ution No. 73-52-6 4.:·-···
See page "X" t.u l ~..Qµ~Jy M ~f-1 ~~ J ~ · rl'M..I,,_,_,.,...,.,,.
DI STR I CT 7 \;,.Q"'°* ~aAh
Con siderati on of Res olution No . 76 -16-7, estab lish ing the
compensation and e xp e nse r e i rr:bu rs err.ent po lici e s for its
Directors , a nd repealing RC1,!jplut i o ;1 No . 7.:.5..r:~ \'"'O
See p age --~-~ Q...~lj-tPtsi... ~~--
-7-
(13)
FILE············_····,,·· ~
lfTTER ···=:_\··rfl ~ •••. TKLR ,... ... ).! _-.:·, ·
(14)
• Roll Call Vo!c or Cast
Un::inimrus B:!llot
FlLE ·-----------·-----/
R£L-V LETTER ··-··-----····
A/C ••.. TKLR ....
·Fl.LE -··········v .. ·••
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion declaring inten~ to transfer Districts' interest
in 12 KV, 3-phase power line between Plants Nos. 1 and 2, to the
Southern California Edison Company (SCE), for consideration of $11,500.00
and the condition that SCE provide emergency and standby capabilities.
See page "Y"
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of the following resolutions authorizing and directing
execution and filing of documents necessary for Federal Grants under
33 U.S.C., 466 et seq. and State Grants under Clean Water Bond Law of
1970, for 1975-76 Joint Works Improvements and Additions: See page "Z"
District No. Resolution No.
/\t L> 2 76-25-2
M.l .S 3 76-26-3
5 76-27-5 "'tl 5 6 76-28-6
'11/ $ 7 76-29-7
A-t( 5 11 76-30-11
M/;;i 1 76-31-1
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate
purchase of used z7u x 24' lathe, for an amount not to exceed $10,000.00
including tax and delivery, from Thomas J. Rush Company. See page "AA"
~-~j·f~;~~~~2cQ§)) ALL DISTRICTS
LETIER ····•·•··••••• /l\\S Verbal report of Special Cammi ttee to Re}Qew, Staff Procedures re
~~-~:::::.: .. :::: Selection of Design Engineers -G..P~ ~~
.......................... (17) AL DISTRICTS
tions
(18)
suppl s, if any
(19) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adj oum g·,.::s {p
(20)
(21) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn ~·· . .sg
(22)
(23) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn <f" ·. 5 q
(24)
s or supplementa agenda items, if any
-8-
(25)
(26)
(27)
(F1~",_c?.__'_~(.28)
LETTER ••............
A/C •••. TKLR ....
~:.~~-J
----···--········-
(29)
FILE ······-·········-
LETTER~---·r , •• ~. v-
A/C .•• TKLR ••• ·J
.1 . I v· ___ ;,::.~-1..J-~ ••••• .Jt:f "./ ', "-v ---~:~~ .. !;~.'.;. ....•
I
(30)
DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn ~:,5f
if any
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn g:.:s'f
DISTRICT 5
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Irvine
Ranch Water District, dated January 6, 1976, inquiring as to
possible conditions for annexation of territory between Newport
Beach and Laguna Bea·ch to the District. See page "BB''
(b) Discussion
DISTRICT 5
Consideration of Proposed Ordinance No. S09, an Ordinance Amending
Ordinance No. SOS, as amended, and Ordinance No. 508, Pertaining to
Connection Charges. See page "CC"
(a) Open hearing q .. o 5
(b) Report of Secretary
(c)
(d)
(e)
(t)
(g)
CV\}~
Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 509, an Ordinance
Amending Ordinance No. SOS, as amended, and Ordinance No. 508,
Pertaining to Connection Charges, by title only, and waive reading
of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of
Directors present).
Comments by general public, if any
(1) Receive and file written conunents, if any ~~ ~
(2)
Close hearing q._ 01
suggestions and other
ral public and Directors,
Consideration of motion to introduce Ordinance No. S09, an Ordinance
ArnendingOrdinance No. SOS, as amended, and Ordinance No. 508,
Pertaining to Connection Charges, and pass to second reading on
March 10, 197S, at 7:30 p.m. in the District's administrative office
(31) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn q: I o .
-9-
.@DISTRICT 7
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file legal opinion of
FILE .•.......•••••.•••
LETTER ••••••••••••••
-,~~-h
~-lD
the District's General Cminsel relative to the request of
the proponents of annexation of the Orange Park Acres area
to establish an improvement district solely to pay the District
annexation fees. See page "DD"
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from
Peggy L. McElligott, Attorney for Orange Park Association; dated
January 28, 1976, regarding Proposal for Concurrent Annexation and
Bond Authorization -Orange Park Acres. See page "EE"
(c) Consideration of request of Orange Park Association re annexation
and conditions therefor, as determined by the Board
~DISTRICT 7 ~ Consideration of Resolution No. 76-39-7, amending Resolution No. 75-44-7
Roll Call Vote or Cast establishing annexation policy re computation of annexation acreage
FILE ·········UA!Hftmou Ballot ' fee. See page "FF"
A/C •••• TKLR •.•
~~ DISTRICT 7
Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any ~A.UaAOg~ ~ '\<.:t) ~· •
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn q ·,~ '/ (35)
-10-
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127
of Orange County, California 10844 Ell is Avenue
Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
ALL DISTRICTS
JOINT BOARDS
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS
FEBRUARY 11, 1976 -7:30 P.M.
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
(8) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating
and Capital Outlay Revolving Ftmd accotmts payable check registers
for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing
payment of claims listed on page "I" ; and approving accotmts
payable check registers for signature of the Chairman of the
respective District, and authorizing payment of said claims listed
on the pages indicated below:
fHS'f'RICT 1 warta:ttts, if any ......................•... NONE
DISTRICT 2 warrants -See page "II"
DISTRICT 3 warrants -See page "II"
DiSTRICTS 3 ~ 11 suspoRso fUH:Ei waPrants, if an~ ..... NONE
DISTRICT 5 wa·n·ant& -See page "II"
DISTRICTS 5 & 6 suspense nmEi warrants, if ~Y.. ••••• NONE
DISTRICT 6 '•iEll'l'a-Hts, if any •.•.•.••...••............ NONE
DISTRICT 7 warrants -See page "III"
DISTRICT 11 warrants -See page "III"
(12-c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Resolution No. 842
of the City of Yorba Linda opposing adoption of Sanitation
Districts' resolutions establishing compensation and reimbursement
for expenses for Directors.
WARRANT NO.
2863~
28633
2~634
286 35
28636
28637
28638
2863 9
28640
28641
28643
28644
28645
28646
28647
28648
28649
28650
28651
28653
28654
28655
28656
2865 9
28660
28662
28663
28664
28665 _
28666
28667
28668
28669
286 70
28 671
28672
28673
28 674
2867 5
28676
.2e677
2e67 9
286 80
286 e1
2868 3
2868 4-
28685
2868 6
28687
28688
28690
2869 1
2869 2
2 ~693
28695
"l-1"
JO INT OPERATING FUND WARRAN TS
IN FAVOR OF
A & S Building Maintenance Co., Janitorial Service
Advance Electric, Re pair Bearing
Ai r California , Air Fare, Various Me etings
All Bearin g Service, Inc., Se a l s, Be arings & V-Belts
American Cyanamid Company, Chemicals
Ameren Corrosion Control Division, Protective Coatings
The Anchor Packin g Co., Gasket Material
V. B. And e rson, We lding Supplies
Arr9 w-Risc o , Inc., Samplin g Supplies
Associated Concrete Products, Inc., Concrete
Ralph W. Atkinson Company, Valves
BRW Safety Supply, Sa fety Signs
Banning Battery Com pany, Ba tteries
Barnes & Delaney, Dewater i ng ·supplies
Beckman Instruments, 11 0n Ri ngs
L. W. Bemis Tractor & I mplements, Equ i pment Re pair
Benz Engineering , Inc., Pump & Compressor Parts
Black & De cker Mf g . Co., To o l Repa i r
Blower Paper Comp a n y , Hardwa re
Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment exams
CS Company, Freight
Cal's Cameras, Photo Processing & Supplies
CASA, Me mbershi p F e es
Castle Co ntrols, Inc., Valves
Chandler's Refrige ration, Equipment Repair
Co ast Nut & Bolt Co., Hardware
Co llege Lumber Co ., Inc ., Bui lding Mater i als
Co ns o lidat ed Electr i ca l Di s t brs., Electric Supplies
Co ntinent a l Radiat o r, Radia tor Repa ir
F . B. Co o ~ Corp ., Raise Ma nholes
Le e L. Cory, Empl o y e e Mile a g e
Costa Me sa Auto Pa rts, Inc., Truck Pa rts
Charles P. Crowley Co ., Mete r Pu mp Re pair
Culligan De ion i z e d Wa t er Service, Lab Su pplie s
C~ R. Dav i s Supply Co ., Hos e
De cke rt Surg ical Comp any, First-A i d Suppl i es
De co, Samp ling Pa rts
'De Guelle & S ons Gla ss Co ., Truck Repa i r
Di amond Core Dr i lli n g Co ., Co r e Dr i lli n g
Di amond -Ne wport Ic e Co ., Samp ling Ma terials
Ni ck DiB e nedetto, Employee Mi l e a g e
Dow Ch emi ca l Compa ny , Te st Ma t e rials
Ida L. Du e sb e r g , Employe e Mil e a ge
Ea stma n, Inc ., Of f ice .Supp lie s
Electric Balancin g Co ., Centr i fu ge Re pair
Enchant e r, Inc .·; Ocean Services
En g ine & Compress o r Supply Co ., En g ine Parts
Enterpri se Printing Comp any , Print i n g
Era wan Garden Ho tel, CASA Lo d g ing
Es s i c k Ma c h ine r y Co ., Compre sso r Pa rts
Filter Sup p ly Co ., Filters
Fische r & Po rte r Com pany, Instrume nts
F ische r & Po rte r Compa ny, Re c o rde r & Pu mp Parts
Cl i fford A. F o rke rt, En gi n ee ring S e rv i ces
Com pre ss o r Pr o duc t s Division, Co mp r ess or Repair
'•
AMOUNT
$ 366.00
33 .70
53,1.J ~
l,443.5b
10,28 0.55
825.34
124.03
83.21
50.88
89 .04
8 9 .81
18.44
482.02
3,844.62
85 .03
34 .87
444.62
41.95
8?.48
26.00
8.50
159.80
1,610.00
82.8 4
54.oo
243 .17
201.07
1 ,256 .71
135 .32
6,000 .00
4.50
531. 56
742.00
.40 . 00
71 .55
45 .05
74 . 2.0
142 . 01
12 7 .00
15 .90
79 .80
6,57 9 .23
13.05
8 56 .27
12 5 .00
3,000 .00
687 . 44
21.04
321.84
12 9 . 47
377 .53
1,015 .10
2, 60 9 . 6 r
3,338 .73
21 0 .00
"l-1"
WARRAN'r NO.
28696
28697
28698
2R6J9
702 ~703
28704
28705
28707
28708
28709
28710
28711
28712
28713
28716
28717
28719
28720
28721
28723
28721.t
2'd725
28726
28727
28728
28729
28730
28731
28732
28733
28735
28736
28737 . 28738 ,
28739
28740
28741
28742
28743
287114
28745
28746
28747
28748
28749
2'd750
28751
28752
28753
28754
28755
28756
28757
,_..,758
"1-2"
IN FAVOR OF
Edward R. Francis, Pl-16 Inspection Expenses $
GAF Corporation, Printer Repair
Ganahl Lumber Co., Building Materials
Garden Grove Lumber Company, Pallets
General Electri.c Supply, Electric Supplies
Georgia Pacific Corporation, Chlorine
General Telephone Company
Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage
Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Grit Removal
Graybar Electric Co., Electric Supplies
Hach Chemical Company, Inc., JPL Test Equipment
Hanson 1 s Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies
Harbor Fire Protections, Inc., Fire Extinguisher Service
Ha.rris Conveyor & Rentals, E1..fuipment Rental
Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal
Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease
Hilti Fastening Systems, Hardware
Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires
Honeywell, Inc., Recorder Parts
Jack Hoopaugh Backhoe Service, Equipment Rental
Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies, Rope & Valves
City of Huntington Beach, Water
Irvine Ranch Water District, Water
Jeffery Chain, Chain
Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies
King Bearing, Inc., Bearings & Seals
Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump & Pump Parts
Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies
s. P. Kinney Engineers, Inc., Strainer Parts
Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware & Tools
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tools & JPL Supplies
L & N Uniforms Supply Co., Uniform Service
Lakewood Pipe Service, Pipe
Judy Lee, Employee Mileage
Lewco Electric Company, Truck Parts & Repair
A. J. Lynch Company, Hardware
McKinley Equipment Corp., Freight
McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Hardware
Mayday Tool & Supply Company, Tools
Metropolitan Supply Co., Gauges
Mine Safety Appliances Co., Safety Equlpment & Test Supplies
Mitchell Manuals, Inc., Technical Manuals
Morgan Equipment Company, Equipment Parts
E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Covers & Rings
National Lumber Supply, Building Materials & Tools
Nelson-Dunn, Inc., Engine Parts
Newark Electronics, Electronic Parts
City of Newport Beach, Water
Nolex Corporation, Reproduction Supplies
Occidental College, Ecology Trawl
Orange Coast Hardwood, Building Materials
Orange County Chemical Co., Chemicals
Orange County Stamp Co., Office Suppl~es
Orange Empire Travel Bureau, EPA Air Fare
Orange Valve & Fjtting Co., Pipe Supplies
AMOUNT
191.46
217.15
295.23
36.21
2,309.53
6,335.20
2,494. 94
46. 74
3,078.00
546.19
648.08
29.38
lb.85
992.08
105.00
71.t 3. 51
134.62
1,164.80
40.06
363.00.
1,742.91
26.02
1.75
l,4Lt9.07
349.10
86.26
2,121.76
152.32
168.61
552.17
148.16
2,202.41
496.08
16.80
158.97
416.17
10.25
47.80
16.28
107.95
231.t. 79
24.82
143.56
372.91
183. 96
69.72
52.81
5.00
80.33
450.00
84.80
31.80
12.20
359.11
75.53
"1-2"
WARRANT NO.
28759
28761
2ts762
28763
28764
28765
28766
28767
28·768
28769
28770
28771
2ts773
28774
2~775
28776
28777
28778
28780
28781
28782
28783
28784
28785
28786
28787
28788
28789
28790
28791
28793
28794
28795
28796
28798
28799
28800
28801
28802
28803
28805
28806
28Bo8
28809
28810
28811
28812
28813
28814
28815
28816
28818
28819
28820
28821
II 1-3"
IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
Oxyeen Service, Cylinder Rental
Pacific Telephone Company
$ . 69.30
452.12
47.07
43.1~
llt3. 2S
Petroleum Dynamics, Metering Supplies
Phipps & Bird, Inc., Lab Equipment Parts
Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies
Tom Ponton, Inc., Pump Parts
Porter Boiler Service, Inc., Boiler Parts
Prentice-Hall, Inc., Technical Manuals
Productool, Inc., Tools & Equipment Parts
Pyramid Fence Co., Fencing
Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal
The Register, Bid Notice I-010, P-023 & PW-051
The Republic Supply Co., Pipe Supplies & Compressor Parts
Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Steel
Alan Ries, Lateral Location
Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts
Ruff's Saw Service, Sharpening
S & J Chevrolet, Truck Parts
Sand Dollar Business Forms, Printing
Santa Ana Blue P~int Co., Printing
Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Tubing
W. D. Schock Co., Manhole Repair Materials
Scientific Products, Lab Supplies
City of Seal Beach, Water
Sears, Roebuck and Co., Tools
Security Industrial Supply Co., Pipe Supplies
See Optics, Safety Glasses
S. Fo Serrantino, Employee Mileage
Service Tape & Label Company, Mailing Supplies
Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies
Singer Business Machines., Office Supplies
Southern California Edison Company
South Orange Supply, Pipe Supplies
Southern California Gas Company
Southern California Water Company
Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water
Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Standard Oil Company, Diesel Fuel, Gasoline & Oil
Starow Steel, Steel
Sterling Art & Engineering Supplies, Drafting Supplies
Sun Electric Corporation, Electric Supplies
The Suppliers, Hardware, Tools & Ladders
J. Wayne Sylvester, Director of Finance, Petty Cash Reimb ..
T-Girl Temporary Employment, Temporary Warehouse Help
Tatkin Company, Pump Parts
Taylor-Dunn, Equipmeqt Parts
Thompson Lacquer Company, Paint Supplies
Trexler Compressor, Inc., Compressor Parts
Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Steel
Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts
J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Meter Maintenance
United Parcel Service, Freight-Out
United Reprographics, Inc., Printing
United States Elevator Corp., Maintenance Agreement
United States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts
233.63
31.80
22.08
101.78
166.42
64.oo
63.00
94. 55
291.11
100.00
816.43
55.37
265.76
528.46
26.34
100.01
178.23
19.84
57.76
1,007.06
21~7. 53
66.25
24. 90
101.89
496.75
54.85
57,738.67
325.63
2,Lt65.59
3.00
213.38
115.17
4,133.60
604 .43
22.90
37.74
1,555.76
271.98
504.39
51.65
682.70
469.10
355.10
201.28
1,857.87
355.74
70.43
16.41
33.0,. 427.2~
"l-3"
WAHRA N'l" NO.
28822
28823
28824
~0 825
~27
28828
28829
28830
28831
28832
28833
28834
28835
28836
28838
28839
28840
28841
28842
28843
.28844
28845
28846
II 1-4"
IN FAVOR OF
University of Calif., Irvine Regents, JPL Computer Model$
Utilities Supply Company, Hardware
Van Waters & Rogers, Chemicals
VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies
Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage
Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage
Guy L. Warden & Sons, Pipe Supplies
Warren and Ba1ley Co., Inc., Gauges
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts
R. V. Weatherford Co., Pump Parts
Western Belting, Protective Coating
Western Salt Company, Salt
Western Wire & Alloys, Hard Facing
Westinghouse Electric Corp., Electric Supplies
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
World Travel Bureau, Inc., Air Fare, Pl-16 Inspection
Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage
John M. Wright, Employee Mileage
Wyle Laboratories, Consultanting Service
Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing
Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Services
George Yardley Associates, Controls
Donald Winn, CASA Workshop
AMOUNT
31).07
278.19
2,022.36
176.22
41.10
40.62
59.89
184.63
820.72
15.12
51.94 .
54.12
6g6.42
88.53
3,793.61
4 31. 47
18.15
22.50
463.00
3,947.75
1,286.41
118.95
145.20
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING $ 174,931.1.J2
"I-4"
WARRANT NO.
28652
28657
28658
28661
28678
28682
28689
28694
28700
28706
28714
28715
28718
28722
28734
28760
28772
28779
28792
28797
28804
28807
28817
28826
28837
II I-5"
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Bowe~ Engineering, Inc., JPL Flash Dryer $
John Carollo En~ineers, Engr. Services, ACTS, Fae. Plan
Hugh Carter Engineering Corp., Engr. Services P2-ll-2
Cleveland Mixer Corp., Retention JPL Mixers
Donova~ Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16
Eastman, Inc., Desk
Fairbanks Morse Pump Division, JPL Pumps, PW-045
Forkert Engineerin~, JPL Survey & Engr. Design P2-8-8
General Conveyor, Inc., JPL Conveyor
J. B. Gilbert & Associates, Fae. Plan EIR
J. Putnam Henck, Contractor, JPL-ACTS
Hermes Plastics, Tools
Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Management Pl-16 '
Hopper Service Parts Company, Tools
LFE Corporation, JPL Sludge Pump
Pacific Pumping Company, Retention JPL Pumps
The Register, Bid Notice PW-050, J-9-2 & A-081
Sande Equipment Co., Inc., Retention JPL Filter
Siemag Systems, Inc., Digester Cleaning Equipment, E-076
Southern California Testing Lab., Testing Pl-16
Donald E. Stevens, Inc., Engineering Services Fae. Plan
The Suppliers, Motor & Tools
Twining Laboratories, Testing Pl-16
Victor Comptometer Corp., Office Equipment
Wilson Ford Sales, New Vehicles A-079
AMOUNT
50,000.08
32,673.8~
750.0v
4,Lt32.20
592,347.19
25LJ. 40
5~897.60
7Lt5. 91
6,107.60
5,776.31
240,354.29
409.0?
12,029.65
159.10
40,636.00
1,098.63
223.66
845.88
70,400.00
348.97
2,000.00
1,333.17
30.00
398.62
7,570.92
TOTAL CORF $ 1,076,823.02
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF $ 1,251,754.44
"1-5"
DISTRICT NO. 2
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL.OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
wmmANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
28595
28596
28597
28598
28594
28599
2.8600
28601
28602
J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation, Contractor 2-15
Kasler Corporation, Contractor 2-14-4
Lowry and Associates, Engineering Services 2-14-3, 2-14-4 & 2-15
Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 2-14-4
DISTRICT NO. 3
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 3-20-1, 3-20-2
3-21-1 & 3-21-2
Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 3-20-1 & 3-20-2
Sully-Miller Contracting Company~ Contractor 3-20-1
Title Insurance & Trust Company, Title Report 3-21-2
A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Saliba, Contractor 3-21-1
DISTRICT NO. 5
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
28601A City of Newport Beach, Connection Fee Administration
·~
"II"
$
AMOUNT
22,280.13
100,966.95
6,235.00
234.00
$ 129,716.08
$ 5,840.35
1,638.00
4,466.00
325.00
10,156.00
$ 22,425.35
$ 2,024.48
"II"
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
28602A State of C~lifornia, Annexation #47 Processing Fee
28603
28604
28605
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 7-6-9
Jennings Halderman Hood, RA 20 Reimbursement
The Tustin News, Bid Notice 7-6-8
DISTRICT NO. 11
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
28606 Clifford L. Thompson Construction Company, Contractor 11-4R
"III"
$
$
AMO~
85.00
7,947.20
1, 181.12
83.16
$ 9,211.48
$ 9,296.48
$ 4,141.17
."III"
,, . -~ ;·
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
FEBRUARY 11) 1976 -7:30 P.M.
II A"
Engineer's Estimate $115,000.00
B I D TABULATION
S H E E T
Date February 3, 1976 -11:00 A.M.
· Contract For: SURGE TOWER NO. 2 EXTENSION
AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
JOB NO. J-9-2
CON'l1RACTOR
F. T. Ziebarth Co~
Fullerton, Callfornia
J. Putnam Henck, A Corp & Henck Pro
Joint Venture
San Bernardino, California
James E. Hoagland
Long Beach, California
Donovan Construction Co~pany
Santa Ana, California
ITEM 1
ITEM 2
TOTAL
ITEM 1
ITEM 2
TOTAL
lTEM 1
ITEM 2
TOTAL
ITEM 1
ITEM 2
TOTAL
*Bid Irregularity -Bid Amounts Reversed
TOTAL BID
$62,500
· · ·10,soo
$73, 000
$ 8,861 *
"74,978*
$83,839
$ 90,200
10;300
$100, 500
$ 97,000
10,000
$107,000
AGENDA ITEM #9CA) -ALL DISTRICTS II A"
"B'!
' \ ' Engineer's Estimate $158,798:00
B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N
SHEET
Date February 3, 1976 -11: 00 A. M.
Contract For: INSTALLATION OF FOUL AIR TREATMENT AT
PLANT NUMBER 2, HEADWORKS C
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
JOB NO. PW-050
CONTRACTOR
Skipper & Company
Midway City
James E. Hoagland
Long Beach
TOTAL BID
$147,969~00
$159,200.00
AGENDA ITEM #9(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "B II
II C"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-22
APPROVING ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH
SOUTHEAST JANITORIAL SERVICE FOR ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING MAINTENANCE, SPECIFICATION NO. PW-051
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6,
7, and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the tabulation of bids for Administration Building Mainten-
ance, Specification No. PW-051, and the proposal of Southeast Janitorial Service
therefor, be received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That certain agreement dated March 1, 1976, by and between
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County,
California, and Southeast Janitorial Service, is hereby approved and accepted;
and,
Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to execute said agree-
ment on behalf of the Districts in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 11, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #9(c) -ALL DISTRICTS II C"
"D"
'.' D I D T A B U L A T I 0 N
S JI E E T
Date February 3, 1976, Jl:QQ a.m.
Contract For: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE
SPECIFICATIO.N NO. rw.:osl
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
CONTRACTOR MO. JANITORIAL SERVICE WINDOW CLEA.~ING
Southeast Janitori~l Service
1016 s. Chantilly st.
Anaheim, CA 92806
A & S Building Mtce. Co.
1100 Quail Street
~ewport Beach, CA 92660
Premiere Mtce. of Orange County
12112 Brookhurst #9
Garden Grove, CA 92640
Porte's Building Maintenance
2006 Port Ramsgate Place
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Certified Building Mtce., Inc.
17925 Sky Park Circle, Suite K
Irvine, CA 92707
$395-00 $ 95.00
411.00 ·. 70. 00
520.00 40.00
525.00 144.oo
545.00 69.00
It is recommended that award be made to the Southeast
·Janitorial Service, 1016 s. Chantilly Street, Anaheim, as
the lowest and best bidder.
q,v171 et2--ik
w. N. Clarke
Superintendent
AGENDA ITEM #9(c) -ALL DISTRICTS "D"
"E II
RESOLUTION NO. 76-23
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH SECURITY HEALTH PLAN
RE HMO PREPAID MEDICAL PLAN
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA APPROVING
AND AlITHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH
SECURITY HEALTH PLAN TO PROVIDE !IMO PREPAID MEDICAL
INSURANCE PLAN, PURSUANT TO SPECIFICATION NO. I-010
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6,
7, and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the tabulation of bids for HMO Prepaid Medical Insurance
Plan, Specification No. I-010, and the proposal of Security Health Plan to
provide HMO Prepaid Medical Insurance Plan effective March 1, 1976, pursuant to
said specification, be received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That the General Manager be authorized to execute an agreement
between Security Health Plan and County Sanitation District No. 1 on behalf of
itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7, and 11 for said services effective
March 1, 1976; and,
Section 3. That all other proposals received for said services are hereby
rejecte~.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 11, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #9Cn) -ALL DISTRICTS II E II
II F"
B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N
S H E E T
Date February 3, 1976, 11: 00 a. m. '-61
Contract For: HMO PREPAID MEDICAL INSURANCE PLAN
SPECIFICATION NO. I-010
FIRM SINGLE
1. Security Health Plan $29.90/Mo.
Santa Ana, CA
2. FHP 29.55
Long Beach, CA
3. Ross-Loos Medical Group 33.94
Los Angeles, CA
4.
s.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
TWO PARTY
$59.80/Mo.
72.33
67.87
AGENDA ITEM #9(n) -ALL DISTRICTS
FAMILY
$81.86/Mo ..
89.15
95.01
II F"
B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N
S H E E T
Contract For: UNIFORM RENTAL, SPECIFICATION NO. P-023
Pants
1.
2.
3.
Shirts
Lab Coats
Coveralls
Shop Rags
Protective Door Mats
Mops
SUPPLIER
L & N Uni form
Santa Ana, CA
Prudential Overall Supply
Santa Ana, CA
Standard Industrial Towel & Uniform Supply
Huntington Beach, CA
4. General Industrial Uniform Rental
Orange, CA
5. Ideal Uniform Rental
Garden Grove, CA
Date February 3, 1976, 11:00 a.m.
TOTAL BI-WEEKhY BID
BASED ON EST'D. QUANTITIES
$ 1,167.80
.1,240.99
1,419.20
1,424.97
1,716.64
6. Modern Coverall & Uni form Supply, Inc. 1, 72 2. 30
Norwalk, CA
7. Best Washington Uniform Supply, Inc. 1,817.35
Long Beach, CA
uG" AGENDA ITEM #9(E) -ALL DISTRICTS "G"
"H II
B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N
S H E E T
Date January 29, 1976
11:00 a.m.
Contr~ct For: . FOUR ( 4). 4-WHEEL ELECTRIC CARS
SPECIFICATION NO. A-081
CON'l1RACTOR
.
1. Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company
2114 W. Ball Rd.
Anaheim, CA 92804
2. Dutch Stark Co.
18217 Anninta St.
Reseda, CA 91335
3. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
26701 Redlands Blvd.
· .
TC>TAL BID
$ 9,378.88
9,688.40 (262 Models)
10,248.08 (264 Model~)
11,426.80
Redlands, CA 92_3_7_3 ___________________________ _
It is recommended that award be made to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company,
2114 W. Ball Rd., Anaheim, CA, in the amount of $9,378.88 as the lowest and
best bid.
qJ'n~
W. N. Clarke
Superintendent
,
AGENDA ITEM #9(F) -ALL DISTRICTS II H II
II I II
RESOLUTION NO. 76-24
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 75-138, AS AMENDED
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
S, 6, 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 75-138, ESTABLISHING
TEMPORARY PART-TIME TECHNICIAN CLASSIFICATION,
AS AMENDED, AUTHORIZING INCREASE OF SUCH
PERSONNEL
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. 'Ibat Section 3 of Resolution No. 75-138 is hereby amended to
read as follows:
"Section 3. 'Ibat the General Manager is authorized to employ a maximum
of 15 employees in said position in any one time; and,"
Section 2. 'Ibis resolution shall become effective February 12, 1976.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 11, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #9(H) -ALL DISTRICTS II I II
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. 0. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
J. Putnam Henck. A Corp •• and
CONTRACTOR: Hcnck Pro. a Joint Venture
C. O. NO. 2
--~--~~~~~~----~
DATE February 3 1 1976
--~----~--~------~----~
JOB: YORBA LINDA PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 2-15
--------------~--~--------------------~------------------------------------------~
Amount of th i·s Change Order (ADD) (:QJ;W~x) $ 14,816.99
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract pric~ are hereby approved.
·ADD:
1.
2.
3.
4.
s.
6.
Support of the discharge manifold for this pump station.
Removing the spools, cutting, reflanging and placing a
portion on each side of the check valve so that proper
clearance on the weight arm on the check valve will be
maintained.
Additional supports to support check valve in its
relocated position.
Outside stair well vertical door saw cut into the side
of the pump station beside the center landing on the
existing staircase. (Ref. CSUF letcr dated 12-8-75,
Lowry & Associates letter dated 6-2-75, and So. Cal.
Edison letter dated ll-19~74)
Provide an additional 1600 c.y. of material for
backfill and landscaping around pump station.
Change the bubler tubes and vent lines and galvanize
between the putips and wet well.
Waterproofing brick wall around pump station.
TOTAL ADD
"J-1" AGEN~A ITEM ~9(1) DISTRICT 2
215.68
2.033.08
536.,61
8,984.11
2,400.00
197. 68
$14,816.99
"J-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER PAGE TWO
· J •. Putnam Hcnck, A Corp., and
:o~ACTOR: Hcnck Pro, a ·Joint Venture
C. 0. NO. 2
--~~~-------------------~
DATE February 3, 1976
JOB: YORBA LINDA PUMP STATION, CONTRACf NO. 2-15
---------------------------~------------------------------~---------~---------------------------------------~----------
TIME EXTENSION
The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of
time for work accomplished in Change Order No. 2
Items 1, 2, and 3
For-work accomplished in Change Order No. 2 Item 4
For 'l'r·ork accomplished .in 'Change Order No. 2 Item 5
For work accomplished in Change Order No. 2 Item 6
For work accomplished in Change Order No. 2 Item 7.
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION
30 .Calendar Days
30 Calendar Days
5 Calendar Days
0 Calendar Days
1 Calendar Day
66 Calendar Days
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension this Change Order
Total Time Extension ·
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
0rigina1
SeptelI'her 26, 1975
360 Caiendar Days
Septe~her 21, 1975
66 Calendar Days
. 81 Calendar Days
441 Calendar Days
December 11, 1975
Contract Price $ 671, 146. 00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 7,500.00
. This Change (ADD) ()08~ $ 14,816.99
Amended
Board-authorization date: February 11, 1976
By~
Consulting Engineer
By ____ ~~~~------------------~----~~
"J-2"
Cont rue tor AGENDA ITEM f~C1)
,
Contract Price $ 693,462.99
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By ____________ ~------~----~~~~-
Chief Engineer
DISTRICT 2 "J-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTR'ICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P, O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
KASLER CORPORATION & L. H. WOODS &
CONTRACTOR:~--.S~ON-...;;;..S.--~IN'--C~·~~~~~~--~~~~~---
c.o·. No. 2
~~~--~~~~~-
DATE
--~~~~~--~~~~~~~-
JOB: SANTA ~A RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH 5, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ o.oo
In accord~nce with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
contract work arc hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Contractor's letters dated November 17 & 26, 1975.
For the construction of cast-in-place manhole shafts with
the exception of the cones in lieu of precast manhole
shaft sections with.the following stipulations:
i: . The cone for these manhole shafts shall be detachable.
2. Previsions shall be made in those areas where future
roadway is to be constructed for the shaft to be
lowered or raised where· needed in the future~
3. Fabrication of the manhole shafts shall be done in
accordance with acceptable engineering practices with
regard to loading and in accordance with applicable
AST.M s tand~rds.
-No additional cos1 to the· District for the above changes.
No time extension this change order.
-~~--~~--~--~~~-------~~~~~~-~~~--~--~--~~--~ ~~~~~~--~~~
Or.iginal Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT)
Amended Contract Price
Board authorization date: January 14, 1976 Approved:
$ 4, 24 0) 95 7. 00 ---
$ (5,180:00)
~~~--~~--~-
$ 0.00
~~--~--~~~~
$_4, 235, 7T}_:_~_o __
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, California
By __________ C_o_n_s_u_l_t i 119 E II g rncer
By Chief En9ineer
Contrnctor
II K" .AGENDA ITEM #9(J) -DISTRICT 2 II K"
COUNTY SANITATJON·DI~TRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. o. nox 8127 -lOllftlt ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
4 C.O. NO.
----~~~~~~~----~--
:ONTRACTOR: Sully-m 11 er Contracting Company February 3, 1976
JOB: KNOIT INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 5 AND 6, CONTRACT NO. 3-20-1
Amount of this Change Order (/\DD) (DEDUCT) $ OoOO
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
:ontract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES
ADD:,..
Item
No. Unit ·
7 L. F.
10 V.F.
DEDUCT:
11 LoF.
14 EACH
15 EAQi
16 c. y.
"L-1"
Change Est' d Quantities
From To
2,598 3,323
106 111
882 718
3 0
5 3
so 22
Difference
725
s
164
3
2
28
@ 21. 00/L. F.
@ 138.00/V.F.
Total Add:
@ 42.0q/L.,F.
@ 690.00/EACH
@ 1,380.00/EACH
@ 60.00/C.Y.
'f.otal Deduct:
TOfAL ADD
~.GE~lD.l\ ITE~ f~~(N) -DISTRICT 3
15,225.00
690~00
15,915.00
6,888 .. 00
2,070 .. GO
2,760.00
1 i f,so. o·o
13,398.00
2,517.00
"L-1"
COUNTY SANITATION Dl~)TJUCTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -. 103'1'1 LI.LIS AVLNUL:
FOUNTAIN VAtLEY, CALIFOf,NIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. 4
----~~-----~~-------
) NT RAC To R : __ s_u_1_1 _y-_r_, Ii_. l_l_c_r_· _co_1_1 t_r_n_c_t_i_n_~_c_o_n_11_w_n_y _____ _ DATE __ ~----F~c_h_r_u_ary ___ 3_, __ 1_9_76 _____ >i<'---
KNO'IT INTEHCEPTOR, HEACllES 5 AND 6, CONTH/\Cf NO. 3-20-1
THffi EXTENSION
TI1c Contractor is hereby granted an extension
of tirr1c for:
1. Inclement Weather 22 Calendar Days
2. Pipe Company strikes and late pipe delivery 70 Calendar Days
TUf AL TIME EA'TENSION 92 Calendar ?ays
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension this Olange Order
Total Time Extension
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
oard authorization date: · February .11, 1976
¥----------~--------~----~~~--~--Consulting Engineer
y-------------------~----------------Cont roe tor
Octob.er 31, )974
365 Calendar Days
October 31, 1975
92 Calendar Duys
9 2 Calendar Days
457 Calendar Days
J anua.ry 31, 1976
Original Co~tract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Change (ADD) ~~)
Amended Contract Price
Approved:
$ 4,6021992.00
$ 855.87
-----~~~~--------
$ 2,517.00
------~~~------~
$ 4,60(),364.87
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By ________________ ~~~----~----~
Chief Engineer
"L-2" AGE~DA ITEM U9(N) -DISJ~ICT 3 "L-2"
"M"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-34-3
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-20-1 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO.
3-20-1 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL
CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * *
Tiie Board.of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. ·That the contractor, Sully-Miller Contracting Co., has completed
the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for KNOTT INTER-
CEPTOR, REACHES 5 AND 6, CONTRACT NO. 3-20-1, on the 31st of January, 1976; ~.nd,
Section 2. Tiiat by letter, Boyle Engineering Corporation, District's
engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed
in accordance with the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said
engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and
ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 and 6, Contract No. 3--20-1,
is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract
therefor, dated the 31st day of October, 1974; and,
Section S. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Sully-Miller Contracting
Co., setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of said Knott Inter-
,
ccptor, Reaches 5 and 6, Contract No. 3-20-1, is hereby approved; and,
Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are
hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 11, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #9Co) -DISTRICT 3 "M"
"NII
RESOLtrrION NO. 76-35-3
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF
REA01 27 AND REACHES 28 & 29, CONTRACT
NO. 3-21-2
A RESOLUTION OF nm BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR WESTSIDE RELIEF INTER-
CEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 27 AND REACHES 28
AND 29, CONTRACT NO. 3-21-2
* * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. Tiiat the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents
this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering Corporation,
District's Engineers, for construction of WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR, PORTION
OF REACH 27 AND REACHES 28 AND 29 (FROM KATELLA & LEXINGTON DRIVE TO CRESCENT
AVENUE), CONTRACT NO. 3-21-2, are hereby approved and adopted; and,
Section 2. Tiiat said project is her~by approved and the Secretary be
directed to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with the Guidelines
Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and,
Section 3. Tiiat the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for
bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Heal th and Safety Code of the
State of California; and,
Section 4. Tiiat upon acquisition of the necessary right of way, the General
Manager be authorized to establish the date and time until which bids will be
received and publicly opened and read; and,
Section 5. Tiiat the Secretary of the Board and the District's Engineers be
authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 11, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #9(p) -DISTRICT 3 llN II
"0-1"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-35-3
AUTIIORJZING CONDEMNATION IN CONNECTION WITH
CONTRACT NO. 3-21-2
A RESOLUTION OF TI1E BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 , OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE CONDHfNATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY.
SITUATED IN 'I11E COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, RE: WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR,
PORTION OF REACH 2 7 AND REACHES 28. AND 29,
CONTRACT NO. 3-21-2
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County,
California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 ,
of Orange County, California has found and determined, and hereby does find and
determine, that the public interest and necessity required for public use the
acquisition, construction, completion, operation and maintenance by said County
Sanitation District of certain public improvements, to wit: A sanitary sewer and
all facilities and appurtenances necessary or incidental thereto including manholes,
measuring devices, pumping stations, and other structures for the transporting
and receipt of sewage and industrial wastes for the purpose of transportation,
treating and disposing of said sewage and industrial wastes arising within the
teiritories of said County Sanitation District and such other territories as said
District may have contracted to serve pursuant to law; and that certain real
property situated in the County of Orange, State of California, is necessary
therefor; and,
Section 2. Th.at the real property, the acquisition of which is required by
the public interest and necessity for the uses rand purposes set forth in Sect ion
1 hereof, is situated in the County of Orange, State of California, and is more
particularly described on Schedule "A" and shown on maps marked Exhibit "A"
attached hereto and made a part hereof as though set out in full herein; and,
AGENDA ITEM #9(Q) -DISTRICT 3 "0-1"
"0-2"
Section 3. That the permanent easements and rights of way above described
and necessary to be acquired sha 11 be acquired· subject to the rights of the m·mers, -~
their successors and assigns, to use the surface of the land within the boundary
lines of such casements and rights of way to the extent compatible with the full
and free exercise of said casements and rights of way; provided, however, that:
(a) No building or structure of any kind shall be placed, erected or
maintained thereon;
(b) No streets, alleys nor.roadways shall be constructed upon, over,
or along said easements and rights of way to a grade less than
four feet above the top of any pipe or pipes located within the
lines of said easements or rights of way;
(c) No fill shall be placed or maintained over the surface of the
ground as it shall exist within the lines of said casements and
rights of way upon the completion of the improvements to be
constructed therein greater than six feet in depth.
Section 4. That the permanent easements and rights of way to be acquired
shall include:
(a) The right to construct manholes, air valves, blowoffs, pumping
wells, pumping stations, metering stations, standpipe and
service connection structures appurtenant to said line or
lines of trunk sewer pipe, which structures shall not extend
above the surface of the ground;
(b) The right during construction to use all existing private
roads within the properties of the owners for ingress to and
egress from the work, together with the right, upon completion
of the construction of the pipeline or pipelines or other works,
to construct and maintain an access road upon, over, and along
AGENDA ITEM #9(Q) -DISTRICT 3 "0-2"
such permanent casements and rights of way as may be ·in the
public interest from time to time.
Section S. That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 ,
of Orange County, California, hereby declares its intention to acquire the property
described in Section 2 hereof by proceedings in eminent domain. That the District's
General Counsel be and he is hereby authorized and directed to commence an action
in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Orange
in the name and on behalf of County Sanitation District No. 3 , of Orange County,
California, against all o~~ers and claimants of the above-described properties
for the purpose of condemning and acquiring said properties for the use of said
County Sanitation District; that said condemnation action shall be prosecuted in
accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. That said attorney is
authorized and instructed to make application to said Court for an order fixing
the amount of security by way of money deposits as said Court may direct and for
an order permitting County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California,
to take immediate possession and use of said real property for the uses and
purposes herein described; and,
Section 6. That the Auditor of the District is authorized upon receipt of a
Court order and demand from the General Counsel of the District, to pay to the
County Clerk of the County of Orange such swn or sums of money from District funds
as may be required from time to time to be deposited upon order of the Court
granting immediate possession of easements and rights of way to the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 11, 1976.
~
"0-3" AGENDA. ITEM #9(Q) -DISTRICT 3 II 0·-3"
"P-1"
SIMPSON -STEPPAT
[
--•• -1 .....----~ , __ j.....___~
..... ] 1· . ---~.]
r~ .. :-· . .. --~-~~
r==:i L==-.--:.J
CONSUL TINO CIVIL ENGINEERS
February 4, 1976
County Sanitation District No. 5
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, Ca. 92708
Attention: Mr. Ray E. Lewis
Gentlemen:
In accordance with your request we hereby submit this proposal
for providing civil engineering services in connection with the
proposed Backbay trunk sewer. The scope of our services would
include the following:
1. Hold conferences with District staff and other interested
agencies and private property owners who may be involved
with the project.
2. Provide aerial topographic maps and design surveys.
3. Assist in the obtaining of permits from governmental agencies
such as the City of Ne1~ort Beach, Coastal Commission, etc.
4. Prepare construction drawings and specifications to District's
requirements.
5. Provide the Engineer's estimate of quantities and construction
costs.
6. Prepare legal descriptions and maps for right-of-way acquisition
as required and assist in the procurement of title reports if
necessary.
7. Assist the District's appraiser and attorney in any right-of-way
matters connected with the project.
8. Assist the District in securing and tabulating bids, analyzing
bid results and submit a recommendation on the award of co~struction
contracts.
9. Check shop drawings and working drawings submitted by the Contractor.
NEWPORT CENTER
358 SHn M1yuol Or·1ve. Suite 200 AGEf\'DA ITEM #9 ( S) DISTRICT 5 Newport.. lle11ch. CE1liforn10 92660 -Ii ,· -"P-1"
( 7 1 4) 644-0563
"P-2"
Mr. Ray E. Lewis
February 4, 1976
Page 2
10. Furnish consultation and advice to the District during
construction.
11. Make a final inspection and submit a report on the completed
project.
12. Prepare as-built drawings of the completed work and file the
original drawings with the District,
13. Provide construction staking as requested by the District.
14. Make arrangements for and coordinate soil investigations as
required.
It is understood that the original drawings for the project shall
become the property of the District.
Our fee for Items 1 through 12 of the above scop~ of work would be
a lump sum of $34,000. Item 13, construction surveys, would be
provided as required by the District at our standard hourly rates
of $50.00 per hour for a two-man crew and $68.00 per hour for a
three-man crew. If soils investigations are required, we would
retain a soils engineer approved by the District and the cost
of these services would be invoiced at cost. We would propose
that progress payments of the lump sum fee be as follows:
1. Completion of topographic mapping
2. Submittal of completed construction plans and
specifications
3. Award of construction contract
4. Acceptance of completed project
20%
50%
80%
100%
If for one reason or another a construction contract is not awarded
within six months after the final plans and specifications have been
submitted to the District, then we would expect to be paid 90% of
the lump sum fee. The cost of construction staking and other outside
services such as soils engineering would be invoiced monthly.
It is estimated that the completed plans and specifications would be
ready for submittal to the District wici1in four months after receipt
of authorization to proceed.
I ' ~:
AGENDA ITEM #9(s) -DISTRICT 5 "P-2"
"P-3"
Mr. Ray E. Lewis
February 4, 1976
Page 3
Thank you for the opportunity of submitting this proposal.
Very truly yours,
SIMPSON-STEPPAT
/
() ~ . I /_-. /,. -.
/f. ·-:-;> . 4 :· /--., /' ? ;;./'"\-_,;-?,,). .--· '-../ ._/ . , t -{./ '-y-_ . / ./ . (...
Donald C. Simpson
DCS/klc
r £:C3
I
I
I
~
AGENDA ITEM #9Cs) -DISTRICT 5 "P-3"
II Q"
RESOLUfION NO. 76-37-7
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR TUSTIN-
ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, PORTION OF REACH 14 AND
REACHES 15 & 16, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-9
A RESOLUTION OF nm BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF. COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, PORTION OF REACH
14 AND REACHES 15 AND 16, CONTRACT NO. 7-6~9
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. 'That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents
this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering Corporation,
District's Engineers, for construction of TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, PORTION
OF REACH 14 AND REACHES 15 AND 16, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-9, are hereby approved and
adopted; and,
Section 2. That said project is hereby approved and the Secretary be
directed to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with the Guidelines
Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and,
Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for
bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Heal th and Safety Code of the
State of California; and,
Section 4. Tilat said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m., March 30, 1976,
at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 5. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's Engineers be
authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors . •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 11, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #9(r) -DISTRICT ,7 "Q"
II R"
Shelton & Associates
land Surveyors & Engineers
(714) 842-4100
P.O. aox 2377
1793! BEACH BLVD., HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIF. 92647
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Gentlemen:
January 30, 1976
We propose the following engineering services for the Preparation
of Document Maps for Sanitation District No. 7.
1. Preparation of maps on 28 x 41 inch mylar with a one inch
border on three sides and ample room on the bottom for a
signature block to be selected by the District. Actual mapping
grid will be ZS-inches or 15,000 feet and 38.33 inches or
23,000 feet. The north arrows shall be to the left of the
map. The above figures are based on a square of one-inch
equals 600 feet.
2. Search the records of the County of Orange for pertinent
documents that the District will assist in acquiring. The
District will make any records available which may be on file
at the District's office.
3. Index each document and prepare a master listing in addition
to a card file listing of each document so searched by number,
granter, recording reference, date and other pertinent data.
4. E~ch document to be referenced and plotted on the map with
the document reference shown.
S. Documents are to be filed in folders and transmitted to District.
Our fee schedule for the above engineering is $18.50 per man hour
and we estimate this project will take 515 man hours for a lump sum
not to exceed $9,527.50.
Thank you for your consideration.
GKS:vc
Vf ey rul:Y /01;/, /t.~;I<'#;~
G· ~-Shelton
Contdlting Engineer #157
AGENDA ITEM #9Cu) -DISTRICT 7 II R"
II S~'
Eugene St Amand
20202 Ama~ola ~trent
Orunge Park Acres
January 14, 1976
··Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.?
of Orange County.
Dear Sirs:
Please accept this as a request to annex my property to Sanitation
District lfo. 7.
Owners: Eugene E St Amand and Joyce M. St Amand, J.T.
20§g~ ~~g501a Street, Orange Park Acres.
Assesed Value •.• $8JJO
Improve~ents... 8000
4il6JJO
\
\
ST
::1}2.,•/
• ;;l.Z4CJ}
·s~s._r•
-.,~~J:JL_~.
to?~~.2 I 1 fr
Pf\RCE l -;11 I
\
\
.\
LOT '?8
\.38 ACRES
I._·---2.32..,..,._7 --'~-1
I
Legal Description
Se Corner L98 Tll 918 MB 28 lUhl-4J MMoc Records N 89° 59' 40"
W 2)2 17' N16°t~l 59" W 2)6 .41 S 89° .59' 40" E JJO 12 to PT
in NE Line of said lot 98 so 0 0' 20" ti 226.4J' to Yr of Ucginning
Sincerely
Z-y·.v 4-!Zlnv,J
Eugene St Amand
AGENDA ITEM f9(v) -DISTRICT 7 II s II
"T"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-40-11
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
MANllOI.E REPLACEMENT AND HEPAIR, CONTRACT
NO. 11-lR-1
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR MANHOLE REPLACEMENT AND
REPAIR, CONTRACT NO. 11-lR-1
* * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No; 11 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents
this day submitted to the Board of Directors by the District's engineers, for
construction of MANHOLE REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR, CONTRACT NO. 11-lR-1, are
hereby approved and adopted; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise
for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code
of the State of California; and,
Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m., MarcQ. 2, 1976,
at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's Engineers
be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 11, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #9Cx) -DISTRICT 11 "T"
"U-1"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-32
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 75-168, RULES AND
REGULATIONS RELATIVE TO CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
RESOLUTION NO. 75-168 RELATIVE TO CONDITIONS OF ·
EMPLOYMENT
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 9 of Resolution No. 75-168 is hereby amended to provide
for disciplinary procedures as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference; and,
Section 2. Resolution No. 75-168 is hereby amended by adding Section
thereto, to provide for an employee layoff procedure as specified in Exhibit "B"
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 11, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #12(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "U-1"
"U-2"
EXHIBIT "A"
DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS
The General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to exercise supervision
over all employees and to impose disciplinary actions, for just cause, upon
any person employed under the provisions of the personnel and salary resolutions.
Disciplinary action to be imposed, if any, shall be that which, if in the
judgment of the General Manager, appears to be in the best interest of the
Districts. 'Ibe General Manager shall have the authority to:
Terminate the employee;
or
Suspend the employee, without pay, for a period of time
not to exceed thirty (30) working d~ys;
or
Defer consideration of the employee's annual anniversary
merit review for a period of up to one year;
and/or
Adjust the employee's salary to that representing a lower
step rate within the heretofore-established salary range of
the employee's assigned position classification;
and/or
Reclassify the employee ·by demotion to a position classification
for which a lesser salary range has heretofore been established,
in which case the employee may be assigned a salary representing
any step rate within said lower position classification as deemed
appropriate under the circumstances by the General Manager.
AGENDA ITEM #12(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "U-2"
STEP 1
STEP 2
STEP 3
STEP 4
STEP 5
STEP 6
II Li-3"
EXHIBIT "B"
LAYOFF PROCEDURE
Determination of the need for layoff will be made by the Districts.
Work groups and position classifications will be determined by the
Districts.
Number of employees to be laid off will be determined by the Districts.
Department Head of work group affected will recommend to the Personnel
Review Committee employees to be laid off based upon performance,
demonstrated competency as evidenced by past Performance Review and
Action Notices (PRAN's), length of service, and the requirements of
the Districts. Performance and competency being determined equal among
employees in a position classification selected for layoff, an employee·
with the least amount of full-time continuous service with the Districts
will be laid off first, and thereafter, in order of length of service
with the Districts.
Personnel Review Committee will recommend to the General Manager the
employees to be laid off. The General Manager's action to lay off
employees will be final.
Employees to be laid off will be so informed in writing at least two
weeks prior to the date of said layoff. Such notification will include
"bump down" options. In the event employee has designated a recognized
representative for purposes of employer-employee relations, said
representative will receive a copy of the notification of layoff.
"Bump down" -An employee selected for layoff may "bump down" into a
classification in his work group for which he is qualified (qualification
is presumed where the person has held the position previously with the
District or where the position is in the regular promotional line). An
employee who is selected for layoff and who has not completed the new-
hire probation period is not eligible for a "bump down" option.
An employee informed of his impending layoff or "bump down" must inform
his Department Head within five calendar days of his intent to take the
option of the layoff or the "bump down".
The process will be repeated at the next lower position classification
level within the group where an employee "bumps down".
The salary for an employee that has "bumped down" shall be established
at the same rate of pay for which said employee had been assigned in the
higher classification provided, however, that (a) in the event the exact
same rate of pay is not set forth in the salary range assigned to the
position classification to which the employee has "bumped", then the
employee's rate of pay shall be established as the next lower rate of pay
in the new position classification range; and (b) in no event shall the
employee receive a salary that exceeds Step 5 of the new position
classification to which he has "brnnpcd".
AGENDA ITEM #12CA) -ALL DISTRICTS "U-3"
STEP 7
NOTICES
"U-4"
EXHIBIT "B"
Employees that have been laid off shall be placed on a rehire eligibility
list for their respective work group. The employee most recently laid off
shall be placed at the top of the list and thereafter, in descending order
by date of layoff. Employees' names shall be maintained on the eligibility'-""
list for a period of two years from date of separation.
In the event the Districts conunence hiring for positions from which
employees have been previously laid off, all employees on the rehire
cligibili ty list shall be so notified. Employees responding to said
notification within 10 calendar days will be eligiblci for re-employment
in position classification openings in the work group for which they have
previously been laid off, in order of the rehire eligibility listing. In
the event openings occur in other work groups, the employee may apply for
said openings and will be considered without priority rating along with
other applicants.
Employees who do not respond within 10 calendar days of the date said
notification was mailed by the Districts will automatically have their
names removed from the rehire eligibility listing.
All notices and responses shall be in writing, certified mail, return
receipt requested, to the last address of record, or delivered in
person, for which written acknowledgment must be made. Responses to the
Districts should be addressed to P. O. Box 8127, Fountain Valley, CA 92708.
AGENDA ITEM #12(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "U-4"
"V-1"
PEAT. MARWICK. MITCHELL & Co.
CEHTIF'JED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
000 NEWPORT CENTER DfllVE
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 02660
January 20, 1976
The Executive Conrrnittee
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Dear Members of the Executive Connnittee:
We have completed our initial engagement as auditors for the June 30, 1975
examination of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. With the
experience of the initial examination of the Districts behind us, we have
carefully analyzed the time expended by our professional audit staff and
management to successfully complete the examination. We would like to
briefly highlight the 1975 examination and present our proposal for the
1976 examination and multi year examinations.
1975 EXAMINATION
On June 26, 1975 we completed our interim examination of the financial records
of the Districts for 1975 and reported formally to the Joint Board of Directors
several conditions which we believed to be weaknesses which warranted the
Boards attention. The nature of our letter was orally presented to the full
Board at the July 9, 1975 Board meeting. It was further referred to the Execu-
tive Counnittee on July 24, 1975 where Mike Harrison, engagement supervisor,
discussed the comments further with the members of the executive committee
and Mr. Woodruff of Counsel. We completed our 1975 audit work of the County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County on September 25, 1975. On November 5,
1975 each of the directors of the joi~boards received directly from us a
copy of the financial statements and accountants report thereon. On December 22,
1975 we again formally reported to the Board of Directors on the status of our
June 26, 1975 recommendations.
During the entire 1975 examination of the Districts our staff and management
worked closely with the Director of Finance and staff of the Districts in an
independent professional manner. Our initial investment in the 1975 examina-
tion was substantial and included 1,109 professional staff and manasement hours
plus expenses. This was more than we originally anticipated, but was necessary,
in our opinion, to complete the engagement in a professional and complete manner.
AGENDA ITEM #12CB) -ALL DISTRICTS "V-1"
P. M.M.St CO.
"V-2"
The Executive Committee
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
January 20, 1976
2
The fee which we contracted for was $10,000, which included expenses and has
since been paid. This represents an average cost to you of approximately
$9.00 per professional hour and an investment by us for the initial year of
approximately $17,000. It should be noted that our examination covered ten
separate sets of financial records (the records of the eight districts, joint
operating and joint capital outlay records). A significant portion of audit
time was expended in examination of the Districts' capital assets. For the
fiscal year ending June 30, 1975 outlays for capital assets rose to nearly
thirty million dollars, an increase of approximately 83% over the previous
fiscal year.
PROPOSAL FOR 1976 EXAMINATION
Based on our initial engagement and a complete review of the hours, we propose
to perform the June 30, 1976 examination of the County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County for an annual maximum fee not to exceed $14,000, including
expenses, except if PMMS:Co. found it necessary to do additional work or expend
inordinate amounts of time due to some unforeseen problem. Upon reasonable
demonstration of the existence of such a situation, we would report such
conditions to the Executive Connnittee of the Board of Directors before pro-
ceeding. We anticipate the examination will require 800 hours to complete and
prepare the report. We would progress bill our services as incurred at the
hourly rates set forth in our contract letter of February 28, 1975.
In order to provide service on an ongoing basis which would be beneficial to
both the Districts and our Firm, PMMS:Co. would perform the examination for
the years ending June 30, 1977 and 1978 ~t the same proposed maximum fee of
$14,000s subject to adjustment for future years for national cost of living
increases as set forth in the annual Consumer Price Index contained in the
Monthly Labor Review published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United
~tates Department of Labor. The adjustment for the 1977 and 1978 examinations
would be based upon the calendar year index for all items in the Los Angeles
area beginning with increases as established during calendar year 1976.
* * * * * *
We are looking forward to meeting with the Executive Committee on Tuesday,
January 27, 1976 to discuss further any questions the members may have per-
taining to our proposal.
Very truly yours,
AGENDA ITEM #12(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "V-2"
"W-1"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-33-1
FIXING COMPENSATION FOR DIRECTORS
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FIXING COMPEN-
SATION FOR ITS DIRECTORS AND RESCINDING RESOLUTIONS NOS.
63-128 AND 68-3-1 REGARDING COMPENSATION
* * * * * * * * * * *
\\11EREAS, Section 4 733. 5 of the Health and Safety Code provides that where
two or more County Sanitation Districts have joined in purchase, ownership, use,
construction, or operation of a sewerage system and said Districts hold their
meetings jointly, and one or more of the Directors serve as a Director on more
than one of such Districts meeting jointly, the Districts may, by joint reso-
lution approved by each District, limit the compensation of such a Director for
attending said jointly-held meetings; and,
WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of
Orange County, California, have heretofore executed a Joint Ownership, Operation
and Construction Agreement, dated July 1, 1970, as amended; and,
WHEREAS, said Districts hold their regular monthly meetings jointly;
NOW, ~THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That each Director shall receive the sum of $50.00 for attend-
ance at any meeting of the Board of Directors of this District, provided that he
shall not receive more than the sum of $100.00 per month as such compensation
from this District; and,
Section 2. That not withstanding the provisions of Section 1, when a
Director of this District is also a Director of another District, said Director
shall be paid not more than a total of $50.00 for any jointly-held meeting
attended by him when such other District, or Di$tricts, has, or have, adopted
a resolution substantially similar to this one, as is permitted under the
provisions of Section 4733.5 of the Health and Safety Code; and,
AGENDA ITEM #12(c) -DISTRICT 1 "W-1"
"W-2"
Section 3. Section 2 of this resolution shall not apply to the Director
serving as Joint Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. Th.e Director
serving as Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall receive the
sum of $50.00 from each District which he presides over in a jointly held meeting,
as authorized by Section 4733 of the Health and Safety Code; provided, however,
that the Joint Chairman shall not be paid more than $50.00 by any District for
any meeting; and,
Section 4. Th.at each Director shall receive the sum of eleven cents (11¢)
per mile for each mile, or part of a mile, actually traveled on business of this
District. 11rnt when traveling on the business of more than one District, such
Director shall receive no more than said eleven cents (11¢) per mile, or part
of a mile, so traveled, whether on the business of one District or several
Districts; and,
Section 5. Th.at each District meeting jointly shall bear an equal portion
of said compensation and mileage expense; and,
Section 6. Th.at Resolutions Nos. 63-128 and 68-3-1 concerning compensation
of Directors, are hereby rescinded and made of no further effect; and,
Section 7. That this resolution shall become effective
and,
Section 8. That all actions of this District, whether by resolution, motion
o:r otherwise, inconsistent herewith or contrary to the terms hereof, be and they
are hereby amended to conform to the terms of this resolution.
AGENDA ITEM #12(c) -DISTRICT 1 "W-2"
"X-1"
RESOLUTION NO.
ESTABLISHING COMPENS!\TION AND REIMBURSEMENT
1-'oi~EXl'ENSBS r'OR Di irnc'f6fis
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANI'fA'rION DIS'l'RICT NO. OF OHl\NGE COUNTY,
CALI FORNI!\, 8S'rM3LISHING THE COMPENSA'l'IOi'l AND
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT POLICIES FOR ITS DIRECTORS,
AND REPE!\LING RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS, Section 4733 of the Health and Safety Code provides
that the District Board has the power to fix the amount of compensa-
tion per meeting to be paid each member of the Board or for each day's
service rendered as a member by request of the Board; and
WHEREAS, Section 4733.5 of the Health and Safety Code provides
that where two or more County Sanitation Districts have joined in the
purchase, ownership, use, construction or operation of a sewerage
system and said Districts hold their meetings jointly, and one or
more of the Directors serve as a Director on more than one of such
Districts meeting jointly, the Districts may, by resolution approved
by each District, limit the.compensation of such a Director for
attending said jointly held meetings; and
WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7
and 11 of Orange County, California, have heretofore executed a
Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, dated July 1,
1~70, as amended; and
WHEREAS, Section 4734 of the Health and Safety Code provides
that where two or more County Sanitation Districts have joined in
the administration and operation of the respective Districts and
hold their meetings ·jointly and such meetings ar~ presided over by
a Director of one of the Districts acting as Joint Chairman for and
on behalf of the joint organization, each District so participating
may pay the Joint Chairman the same compensation as a Director of
such District is paid; and
AGENDA ITEM #12Cc) -DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,&7 "X-1"
WHEREAS, said Districts hold their regular monthly meetings
jointly.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That each Director shall receive the sum of Fifty
Dollars ($50.00) for attendance at each meeting of the Board of
Directors or for each day's service rendered as a member of th~
Board by request of the Board, provided that he shall not receive
more than the sum of Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) per month as such
compensation from this District. Each day's service rendered as a
member of the District Board shall be deemed to includ~, but not be
limited to, attendance: (a) as a member of the Executive Committee
of the Joint Administrative Organization; (b) as a meml>~r of any
committee appointed by the Chairman of the Joint ~dministrative
Organization or the Chairman of the District which has established
the committee; (c) when expressly invited to attend the Executive
Committee meetings by the Chairman of the Joint Administrative
Organization; (d) conferences with State and/or Federal legislators
regarding Joint Administrative Organization business when approved
by action of the Joint Boards; or (e) attendance at conferences for
business of the Joint Administrative Organization or the District
when approved by action of the Joint Boards or the District Board.
Section 2. If a Director represents two or more Districts,
the payment to the Director for attendance at meetings or for each
day's service shall be shpred equally with each District repre-
sented by the Director.
Section·3. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 1,
when a Director of this District is also a Director of unother
District, said Director shall be paid not more than a total of
Fifty Dollars ($50.00) per day for attendance at uny jojntly
held meeting of said Districts or each day's services rendered
AGENDA ITEM #12(c) -DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,&7 "X-2"
"X-3"
concurrently to said Districts by the Director when such other
District, or Districts, has, or have, adopted a resolution
substantially similar to this one, as is permitted under the
provisions of Section 4733.5 of the Health and Safety Code.
Section 4. Section 3 of this resolution shall not apply to
the Director serving as Joint Chairman of the Joint Administrative
Organization. The Director serving as Chairman of the Joint Admin-
istrative Organization shall receive the sum of Fifty Dollars
($50.00) from each District which he presides over in a jointly
held meeting of the Joint Administrative Organization, as author-
ized by Section 4734 of the Health and Safety Code; provided,
however, that the Joint Chairman shall not be paid more than
Fifty Dollars ($50.00) by any District for any meeting •.
Section 5. The Director serving as Chairman or Vice Chairman
of the Joint Administrative Organization shall receive the sum of
Fifty Dollars ($50.00) from the District which he represents and no
other District when attending a meeting of his District or other
Districts or Executive Committee or other Committee assignments
approved by the Joint Boards, or when attending to special service
rendered as a Director by request of the Joint Boards.
Section 6. Each Director shall receive the sum of Fifteen
Cents {$.15) per mile for each mile up to and including 150 miles,
·Twelve Cents {$.12) per mile for each mile over 150 miles up to and
including 600 miles, and Six Cents ($.06) per mile for all miles in
excess of 600 miles, actually traveled on business of the District
per month. When traveling on the business of more thar1 one District,
such Director shall receive no more than said mileage, whether on
the business of one or several Districts.
Section 7. When tr av el ing on the business of one or more.
Districts, the Director shall be entitled to reimbursement of
expenses necessarily incurred in the.course of said tr~vel in
nccordance with the following schedule:
AGENDA ITEM #12(c) -DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,5,&7 II x-3".
·'
"X-4"
Commercial Tronsportation -per actual invoice
Hotel -room rate per actual statement for occupancy
Registration -actual cost of conference or meeting
registration fee
Ground Transportation -as itemized
Telephone Service -as itemized
Meals, Gratuities and Incidentals -$20.00 per day. In those
cases where the actual cost of the Director's personal meals
and incidentals required during the course of the conference
or meeting exceeds the per diem, reimbursement will be based
upon actual expenditures.
Section 8. No Director shall receive pny for attendance at
any meeting, such as Executive Committee or other committees, which
is scheduled immediately preceding, immediately succeeding, or con-
current with a regularly scheduled District or joint meeting of the
District.
Section 9. Resolution No. concerning compensation
for Directors is hereby repealed and made of no further force or
effect.
Section 10. This resolution shall become effective
1976.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a· regular meeting held
1976.
AGENDA ITEM #12(c) -DISTRICTS 1,2,1,5,6,&7 II X-L~ II
"Y"
Staff Report
on
CONSIDERATION OF THE TRANSFER OF THE 12 KV,
3-PllASE POWER Lnm BETWEEN PLANT NO. 1 AND
PLANT NO. 2 '£0 SOUTHEHN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
2-4-76
In November, 1969, the Boards entered into an agreement with the
Edison Company wherein the Districts and Edison utilized a joint pole
line for power transmission, on District property and casements, be-
tween Garfield Avenue and the Coast Hir,hway under conditions prescribed
by the Boards. At the present time, the Districts have one power
source from the Edison Company for all power utilized by the joint
works. Power for Plant No. 1 is transmitted via the District owned
12 KV, 3-phase line on the aforementioned joint pole system between
the two plants. This sinr;le power source for both.plants has saved
the Districts approximately $24,ooo per year because of Edison's rate
structure. However, on occasion, this has not provided the r~liability
necessary for operations and a single source of power is contrary to
State and EPA regulations on reliability of electrical energy for
municipally operated treatment facilities.
When the 50 MGD activated sludge addition at Plant No. 1 is on
line this 12 K.V system will be inadequate to serve our facilities at
Fountain Valley from Plant No. 2. We evaluated the use of this line
for standby or emergency service during the design sta~e of the Plant
No. 1 project and determined that an expenditure of $200,000 would be
required for switching equipment and reconnection of existing circuits
at Plants Nos. 1 and 2. Therefore, provisions were made as a part of
the $30 million construction project (P1~16) to provide for separate
service at Plant No. 1.
Edison Company personnel have advised that they can incorporate
our existing power line into their system and provide alternate
erne~gency sources to the two treatment facilities without additional
cost to the Districts for equipment or the standby charges usually
associated with this kind of service. Their plan will allow the
Districts to remain on the present A-7 po~er rate cchedule at both
plants for an estimated savings of $24,000 per year, until such time
as the power requirements exceed 5,000 KW demand at one of the plants.
We estimate that this will occur sometime in 1979.
Since this line, which was constructed j_n 1961 for $33,985,
will not serve the Districts' needs without costly additions and
modifications, it is surplus and, as such, its value is determined to
be that which could be obtained as salvage for used wire, poles, and
crossarms. This is estimated to be $11,500. The Edison Company has
offered to purchase this line from the Districts for our established
salvage value. We obtained quotations for the used wire from two
salvage companies. Each quoted 114¢ per pound, which is the going
price for copper, delivered to their facility. TM.s equates to
$10,127. There is no market for the 35-foot poles which are now 15
years old.
It is recommended that the Boards declare their intent to
transfer ownership of the Districts' power line between the two plants
to the Edison Company for a cash consideration of $11,500 with the
conditions that the transfer would be made in accordance with the
Districts' needs and that Edison would provide the alternate emergency
sources to feed the two treatment plants ~s proposed.
It is also recommended that the appropriate ngreement be
prepared in a form acceptable to the General Counsel and brought back
to the Boards for their consideration.
AGENDA ITEM #13 -ALL DISTqrcTS "Y"
"Z-l 11
RESOLUTION NO. 76-31-1
FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS -1975-76 JOINT
·woRKS IMPROVEMENTS AND ADDITIONS
A RESOLUTION OF 11iE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION AND
FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL GRANT
UNDER 33 U.S.C., 466 ET SEQ., AND STATE GRANT UNDER
CLEAN \\'ATER BOND LAW OF 1970, IN BEHALF OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, AND PROVIDING CERTAIN ASSURANCES
* * * * * * * * * * *
1be Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT:
Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water Pollution Control
Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 466 et seq.) provides for Federal grants for con-
struction of sewage treatment works.
Section 2. 1be State Clean Water Bond Law of 1970 authorizes the State
Water Resources Control Board to enter into contracts with public agencies for
State Grants for construction of sewage treatment works.
Section 3. County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, is a
separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division S of
the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for the purpose of constructing,
operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer system for the collection of sewage
from the cities and other local collection sewering agencies, and has joined with
other County Sanitation Districts; namely, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, and 11, in constructing, operating and maintaining joint sewage treat-
ment plants and disposal facilities under an agreement dated July 1, 1970, as
amended, known as the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement.
Section 4. In accordance with the terms of said Joint Ownership, Operation
and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County,
acts for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
AGENDA ITEM #14 -ALL DISTRICTS "Z-1"
"Z-2"
and 11, of Orange County, California, each organized for similar purposes and
serving different territories, all in Orange County, California, for the purpose
of constructing and operating said joint sewage treatment plants and disposal
facilities.
Section 5. By means of this resolution and of the resolutions set forth
below by number, the following County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
California, have authorized the filing of applications for grants under said Act
of Congress and said Clean Water Bond Law and have authorized County Sanitation
District No. 1 to file said application in their behalf.
District No. Resolution No.
2 76-25-2
3 76-26-3
5 76-27-5
6 76-28-6
7 76-29-7
11 76-30-11
1 76-31-1
Section 6. Fred A. Harper, General Manager, is hereby authorized and
directed to sign and file for and on behalf of County Sanitation District No. 1,
for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and
11, Application for Federal Grant for Sewage Treatment Works Under 33 U.S.C. 466
et sc.q. and any agreements or other documents necessary to secure and receive
such grant and a State Grant for Clean Water under the Clean Water Bond Law of
1970, for a joint project generally described as follows:
1975-76 Joint Works Improvements and Additions
Section 7. District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7, and 11, hereby agrees and further does
authorize the aforementioned Representative to.certify that if a Federal grant
for its project is made pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as
amended (33 U.S.C. i171 et seq.), it will pay the remaining cost of the approved
AGENDA ITEM #14 -ALL DISTRICTS "Z-·2"
"Z-3"
project; it will provide proper and efficient operation and maintenance of the
approved project after completion of construction thereof; it will comply with
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (F.L. 88-352) and the regulations issued
pursuant thereto and state that the Assurance of Compliance with such Regulation
attached to the Application for Federal Grant applies to this project; and it
will comply with requirements of Executive Order 11246 pertaining to equal
employment opportunity in Federally-assisted construction contracts.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 11, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #14 -ALL DISTRICTS "Z-3
II AA II
2-4-76
Staff Report
on
Purchase of Used Long Bed La.the
Included in the Districts' equipment budget for the current
fiscal year (1975-76) is $19,080 for the purchase of a used long bed
lathe to be used in our maintenance shops for repair and modification
of drive lines, piping, pump shafts, etc.
In our search through the used machinery dealers over the past
few months a number of suitable lathes have been located. Those
listed below are indicative of the available supply and their
comparative values (although two of the units ha.ve been sold at this
writing).
Description
Lodge & Shipley
27" x 24'
Putnam
46" x 38'
(sold)
Monarch
27" x 20'
(Oakland)
American
24" x 20 1
(sold)
Lodge & Shipley
25" x 18'
Vendor
Thomas J. Rush Company
5632 Burlingame Ave.
Buena Park 90621
(714-523-3573)
Liles Machinery Sales
2657 E. Slauson Ave.
Huntington Park 90255
(213-589-3701)
Barker Machinery Co.
6921 So. Santa Fe
Huntington Park 90255
(213-588-3205l
(415-569-0304
Camras Company
2066 So. Sarita Fe
Los Angeles 90021
(213-588-1211)
Faz co
2509 East 55th Street
Huntington Park 90255
(213-589-8171)
Price
$ 9,795.46
$14,ooo.oo
$18,950.00
$17,950.00
$27,500.00
We believe the Lodge & Shipley 27 11 x 24' lathe offered by the
Thomas J. Rush Company for $9,795-46 to be a good value for the
Districts. Our mechanical supervisor has inspected the unit and our
machinist has test-run it and find it to be in good mechanical
condition.
It is therefore recommended that a~thority to purchase the
Lod(Se & Shipley 27" x 24' lathe from the Thomas J. Rush Company
for the total price of $9,795·1-~6, including tax and delivery to our
shop, be obtained at the February 11, 1976 Joint Board meeting.
7)J Jn e Jt-:.~
w. N. Clarke
AGENDA ITEM #15 -ALL DISTRICTS II AA II
"BB"
Janua t·y 6, 1976
Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 5
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject:
Gentlemen:
Request Terms and Conditions for
Annexation to OCSD #5
659LCC1/76
We have retained Willdan Associates, an engineering consultant, to prepare
a study of alternotive methods of waste water disposal for The Irvine Company's
coastal area between Newport Beach and Laguna Beach. A portion of this study
area has been included in the Orange County Sanitation District No. 5 reports
of November 1969 and December 1971 prepared by the District Engineer. The
area considered at this time is approximately that area designated as Number 1
in the District's December 1971 Master Plan Revision.
IRWD requests the conditions for annexation of the study area to OCSD #5
including political, financial and engineering, to be identified. We will be
pleased to provide additional information regarding proposed population an-
ticipated sewage flows, boundaries of service area, etc. as i~equested.
Tha.nk you for your consideration of this request.
Very truly yours,
. I) ./ /fuil&¢AJ--~o/Coffelt ·
Director Engineering & Planning
Irvine Ranch Water District
AGENDA ITEM #28(A) -DISTRICT 5 "BB II
ORDINANCE NO. 509
AN ORDINANCE OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
NO. 5 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. SOS, AS AMENDED,
AND ORDINANCE NO. 508, PERTAINING TO CONNECTION
CHARGES
The Board of Directors of Cotmty Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange
County, California, does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1: Section (a) of Article 6 of Ordinance No. 505, as amended, is
hereby further amended to read as follows:
"(a) District Connection Charges. Before any connection permit
shall be issued, the applicant shall pay to the District, or its agent, the
charges specified herein.
(1) Connection Charge for New Construction, Family Dwelling
Buildings. For each new family dwelling bul.lding constructed,
the connection charge shall be $250 per dwelling unit.
(2) Connection Charge for New Construction, Other Than Family
Dwelling Buildings. For all other new construction, including
but not limited to commercial and industrial buildings, hotels
and motels and public buildings, the connection charge shall
be $130 per 1000 square feet of floor area contained within
such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge
for such new construction shall be $130.
(3) Connection Charge for Replacement Buildings. For new
construction ·replacing former buildings, the connection charge
shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in
P~ragraphs (1) and (2) hercinabove. If such replacement
construction is conunenced within two years after demolition
or d~struction of the forrner building, a credit against such
charge shall be allowed, calculated on the basis of the
current connection charge applicable for the new construction
"CC-1" AGENDA ITEM #29 -DISTRICT 5 "CC-1"
of the building demolished or destroyed. In no case shall
such credit exceed the connection charge.
(4) Connection Charges for Additions to or Alterations of Existing
Buildings. In the case of structures where further new
construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy
of family dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be
used for other than family dwelling buildings, the connection
charge shall be $250 for each (h-Jelling unit added or created and
in the case of new construction other than family dwelling buildings,
it shall be $130 per 1000 square feet of additional floor area
contained within such new construction, provided that the
minimum connection charge for such construction shall be $130.
When Charge is to be Paid. Payment of connection charges
shall be required at the time of issuance of the building permit
for all construction within the District, excepting in the case
of a building legally exempt from the requirement of obtaining
a building permit in the City of Newport Beach. The payment of
the sewer connection charge for such buildings will be required
at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection
permit for any construction within the territorial limits of
the District.
Schedule of Charges. A schedule of charges specified herein
will be on file in the office of the Secretary of the District
and in the Building Department of the City of Newport Beach."
Section 2. Section 1 herein shall become effective thirty (30) days following
adoption of this ordinance.
"CC-2" AGENDA ITEM #29 -DISTRICT 5 "CC-2"
"CC-3"
Section. 3. Section 402 of Ordinance No. 508 is hereby amended to read:
"402. DISTRICT NO. 5 CONNECTION CHARGES
1. District Connection Charges
Before any connection pcrmi t shall be issued, the applicant
shall pay to the District, or its agent, the charges specified
herein.
(a) Connection charges for new construction, family
dwelling buildings.
For each new family dwelling building constructed,
the connection charge shall be $250 per dwelling unit.
(b) Connection charge for new construction, other than
family dwelling buildings.
For all other new construction, including but not
limited to commercial and industrial buildings, hotels
and motels and public buildings, the connection charges shall
be $130 per 1000 square feet of floor area contained
within such construction, provided that the minimum connection
charge for such new construction shall be $130.
(c) Connection charge for replacement buildings.
For new construction replacing former buildings, the
connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis
as provided in· paragraphs (a) and (b) above. If such
replacement construction is commenced within two years
after dcmoli ti on or destruction of the former bui I ding,
a credit against such charge shall be allowed, calculated
on the basis of the current connection charge applicable
for the new construction of the building demolished or
destroyed. In no case shall such credit exceed the
connection charge.
AGENDA ITEM #29 -DISTRICT 5 "CC-3"
(d) Connection charges for additions to or alterations of
existing buildings.
In the case of structures where further new construction
or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of family
dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used
for other than family dwelling buildings, the connection
charge shall be $250 for each dwelling unit added or created
and in the case of new construction other than family
dwelling buildings, it shall be $130 per 1000 square feet
of additional floor area contained within such new
construction provided that new construction shall contain
additional fixture units.
(e) Payment of connection charges.
Payment of connection charges shall be required at the
time of issuance of the building permit for all construction
within the District, excepting in the case of a building
permit in the City of Newport Beach. The payment of the
sewer connection charge for such buildings will be required
at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing
connection permit for any construction within the
territorial linats of the District.
(f) Schedule of charges.
A schedule. of charges specified herein will be on file
in the office of the Secretary of the District and in the
Building Department of the City of Newport Beach."
Section 4. 1110 Secretary of the Board is directed to certify to the adoption
of this ordinance and cause it to ·be published in a newspaper of general circulation
~
within the County. TI1is ordinance shall take effect ·thirty d:iys after its adoption.
"CC-4" AGENDA ITEM #29 -DISTRICT 5 "CC-4"
LAW OFFICES
RICHARD O. f"RAZEE
~ STEPHEN C. !:.TEWART
THOMAS L. WOODRUF"f"
JEF"f"REY A. HARTMAN
1055 NORTH MAIN STREET, SUITE 1020
SANTA ANA, CALI FOR NIA 92701
ARE:A CODE 71"4
835 -6212
"DD"
January 21, 1976
Mr. Fred A. Harper
General Manager
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
P. o. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Re: Orange Park Acres Annexation to
County Sanitation District No. 7
Dear Mr. Harper:
I have been advised that the Directors of the Orange Park
Acres Homeowners Association have recently submitted to your
office a revised annexation and improvement plan for their
properties. Specifically, the request now appears to seek
to annex to County Sanitation District No. 7 and not install
any portion of the main/trunk sewer system at this time.
It is my opinion that there is no legal basis under the County
Sanitation District Act, the Improvement District Acts or the
District Reorganization Act to establish an improvement dis-
trict solely to pay foi the annexation fees that would be
paid to District No. 7.
The provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 4806 clearly
intend that improvements must be installed when issuing bonds
and annexation fees alone would not qualify.
District No. 7 could require the payment or security for the
future payment of annexation fees to be posted with the
District prior to final action upon the annexation.
'l"'LW: ab
l-A-2
truly yours,
Tho:: f(dj;~fr
General Counsel
AGENDA ITEM #32(A) -DISTRICT 7 II DD"
ERNCS1. A. Wll,.llON
KCNNCT ... I. JON CS
JAMl!:S T. MORTON
JO ... N C. LYNCH (19!>8•1971)
PHILIP D "'SSA,.
""NDRCW C HALL, JR.
OCR""LD A LASTER
J£ .. CMIAH J. LYNCH
MICHAEL A. N""VE
JAMES L. CO Pl!: LANO
SHARON S. WHITE
w·n.soN, ,JQNJ~s. MoHTON & J. .. YNCII
ATTORNEYS ANO COUNSELLORS AT LAW
630 NORTH SAN MATEO DRIVE'
CHAstLrs H. MIRKllRIOI[
1e••·••11
KIRKBRIOC & GORDON
(JOSCPH B, GOSIOON)
P.O. BOX 152
.......,, PEOOY L. M•r'.LLIOOTT
ROl51!.RT J. HILL
THOMAS C. MORONEY
YMOMAS It. ""C>AMS
SM£RR00 9 DAVIS
LAWRENCE C. JCNSEN
MAY CR ""·DANIEL
JOAN E. DRIOO"
PAUL C WILJl\IN5
THOMAS !>.OWEN
RODCRT 0 ... uweRCY
ROY J. t<.OEOEN
SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA 94401
[•us] 342-3S23
181'9•19'47'
KIRK8A1oc,w1'-SON. t-414.RZ~Cl.D .. WALLACE
January 28, 1976
0,. COUN!ICL
AATHUA ..J, HAAZ,.Cl.0
A. A. ""'PLAN (MO. ONLY)
Honorable Board of Directors
Sanitation District No. 7 of
Orange County
P. 0. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Re: Proposal for Concurrent Annexation and Bond
Authorization -Orange Park Acres
Gentlemen:
On behalf of the residents and property owners of the Orange Park
Acres area and the Orange Park Association, Inc., the following is the
general proposal now being made in connection with the annexation.
Following extensive investigation and discussion, the concept
which is proposed to be followed is generally as follows:
1. Concurrently with the annexation procedures, following original
proposal, it would be submitted to the voters as a condition of annexa-
tion the approval of general obligation borrds covering the following:
"EE-1"
a) The sum of money necessary to acquire appropriate
rights of service and use in the existing treatment and
outfall facilities equal to the appropriate annexation
charge.
b) The payment of a sum necessary to provide major
trunks necessary to serve the area within the boundaries,
the costs to be adjusted to reflect an off set of any
territory within the boundaries of District No. 7 which
abuts and would be served by any part of that system,
i.e., property north of Chapman Avenue and immediately
east of proposed Reach 18 of District No. 7 master plan.
c) The reimbursement of advances made by certain
property owners within the area of costs of annexation,
as well as the payment of any costs incurred subsequent
to approval by LAFCO.
AGENDA ITEM #32(B) -DISTRICT 7 "EE-1"
Honorable Board of Directors
Sanitation District No. 7 of
Orange County
January 28, 1976
Page Two
2. In exchange for this area incurring an obligation to provide
facilities normally payable from connection charges pursuant to the
District's policy of providing trunk sewers within one-quarter mile
of all properties, each separate parcel within the boundaries of the
annexed area as of the date of election would be extended the equivalent
of one connection charge credit at such time as the property is hooked
to the sewer. In this regard, it is proposed that collector sewers be
built either by cash financing, where possible, or by individual assess-
ment proceedings. Additionally, it is expected that divisions of land
after the date of election would result in the obligation to pay con-
nection charges for all except the first connection.
3. As in the case of a private subdivision development, and as
a condition of the general obligation.bond proceedings, the District
will provide for the contribution from time to time from connection
charges of a reimbursement of an appropriate dollar figure relating to
that portion of the trunk system funded through the bond issue. It is
here understood that there are currently outstanding previously executed
reimbursement agreements amounting to approximately $150,000. For that
purpose, an attempt will be made to adjust the reimbursement obligation
in order to assure that the earlier contractors will not be unduly
affected by this proposal. The proceeds of the reimbursements to the
present area would be utilized for the purpose of retiring bonds in
advance of maturity or, if more appropriate from a cost saving standpoint,
for the payment of both principal and interest when due.
It is presently understood that the £oregoing proposal would
result in a maximum initial debt obligation for this annexation of some
$1,141,000. The precise dollar figures must be refined by the assistance
or the District staff and would be available at least in preliminary form
at the time of presentation of the proposal to LAFCO. The final form
would be before your Honorable Board prior to the actual formal hearing
on the annexation. It is proposed that the matter should be expedited
so that it may be placed on the ballot no later than November of thi.s
year, with the understanding that property would be placed on the tax
roll for the 1977-78 fiscal year. Any delay beyond November would
result in a postponement into a later fiscal year.
We hope that the foregoing proposal will result in a c]early
equitable treatment of the property owners and users, both within the
"EE-2" AGENDA ITEM #32(B) -DISTRICT 7 "EE-2"
' . .." ' ·-
Honorable Board of Directors
Sanitation District No. 7 of
Orange County
January 28, 1976
Page Three
present boundaries of Sanitation District No. 7 and within the proposed
annexed area. It is our intent to assure that all persons are equally
treated and that no unfair advantage or "free rides" are r'eceived and
further to assure that the cost of sewers will not be so burdensome as
to prove impossible of accomplishment.
for
PLMcE:s
cc: Thomas L. Woodruff, Esq.
Mr. George C. Rach
Orange Park Association, Inc.
"EE-3" AGENDA ITEM #32(s) -DISTRICT 7 "EE-3"
"FF"
RESOLlJI'ION NO. 76-39-7
AMENDING ANNEXATION POLICY
A RESOLUTION OF TIIB BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO.
75-44-7, ESTABLISHING FEES AND PROCEDURES
CONCERNING ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE
DISTRICT, RE COMPUTATION OF ANNEXATION
ACREAGE FEE
* * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to establish certain requirements for
territory seeking annexation to this District; and,
\~1EREAS, the Board of Directors of this District have heretofore adopted such
requirements; and,
WHEREAS, this Board of Directors has reviewed the heretofore established
policy and finds that it would be appropriate to modify the provision for compu-
tation of annexation acreage fee to eliminate inclusion of local collection systems
because they have no bearing on the cost of the Districts' Master Plan system and
treatment works equity;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Section 1, Sub-Section (b) of Resolution No. 75-44-7 is
hereby amended to read as follows:
''(b) Beginning July 1, 1975, and annually thereafter, the sum to be paid
per acre for the ensuing twelve months will be the net worth per acre of
the District, reduced by the book value of local collection facilities,
on the preceding June 30. Date of approval by the Board of Directors of
the annexation shall govern the amount of the fee per acre hereinabove
established."
Section 2. That this resolution shall be effective ·as of July 1, 1975.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting hcl d February 11, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #33 -DISTRICT,7 "FF"
-·
CONSTRUCTION
PROGRESS REPORTS
JANUARY 31., 19 76
ENGINEERING DEPART11ENT
PECK P1P1tJG-
1 "1 sno.-1..a.Jtr IO AJ
C.OllJ Tl ._,,LU::'S
S1'1::P F£ED PIPIAJG.
/i..t-JP Sl...U 1Ctr G-ATES
{3E/NG-JllJSTAU..EP
,~~1!:>£.
50
10 9 e r 6
2
4
6 --8
/0
12 II
I 4,....,.....-,...,..-L.. __ 1 ~~.JJ
(LARIF/Ei(S
~AilNGSAIVD
SWDE GATE'S S£iN&
JN S7,4LJ...Jf£>//ll cFA/1&k!
~~A
D/C.t:.~T£~~
Doo2. FAAfnES Bt:.l~ JN s;rAu..e:D
D POJ\/£/{ Blfllf)//,/G
fv1 GD ACTl\/.t\TED SLUDGE P.LANT
C 0 ~\l TRAC 1· N 0. P 1 .-16
C.ONTRACT .NO .. P1.-t6
SO MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT
Donovan Construction Company of Minnesota, Contractor
STARTING DATE: June 27' 1974
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $29,876,ooo.oo
PAID TO DATE: $23 320 978 92 ' , .
Contract is for the construction of Activated
Sludge second.ary treatment fad ii ties at Plant No.
1. The new facilities wiZZ aid the Districts in
meeting trandated State and Federal ocean discharge
requirements.
When completed, the secondary treatment system
ll.YiZl process the 50 mgd of wastewater flowing
thro~gh Pfont No. 1. The. effluent wil"l then blend
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Dec. llJ' 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 30 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 13, 1977
UJith Plant No. 2 effluent• at the outfall booster
station, improving the overall quality of water
pwnped through the outfall system into the ocean.
Significant structures included in the contract
are t'he Bl.owe':ri BuiZding, Aeration Basins, Secon.d-
axy CZa1-ifiers, two Digesters, ~!aste Sludge Thick-
eners and the Power Building.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Facia panels have been poured at the tops of the north and south
walls of the Blower Building. Electrj_cal switchgear has been
set inside and the blowers themselves have arrived. Factory
tests on the pump station engines were witnessed by engineering
staff in Ohio. Tests on one of the Emergency Power turbine-
generator units were also witriessed in San Diego. . .
Piping and valves are being installed on top of the Aeration
Basins. Step feed piping and sluice gates are being installed
below the deck ..
Overflow launders, slide gates and gratings are being installed
in the Secondary Clarifiers. The piping installation continues
in the Return Sludge Pump Station.
At the Waste Sludge Thickeners, the baffles a~d mechanisms are
being installed. Roofing materials are being put in place.
No work was done in the Digester area this month.
Hallow metal frames are being installed for the doors and panels
in the Power Buildin~.
joff".IC.E.
I Er---1 '!'LlMP.
/f!A·. I
L _ ---
JPL ACTS PROCESS PLANT JOB N2 .PW-045
(
CONTRACT PW~045
JPL-ACTS PROCESS PLANT
J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation & Hcnck Pro,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
STARTING DATE: Oct. 1, 1975
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: x
PAID TO DATE: x
Contract is for construction of a one million gal-
lon per dc.:y pilot wastewater> treatment plant at
Wastewater Treatment Plant Noa 2o The plant wil],
use a unique Activated Carbon Treatment System
(ACl'S) developed by the National Aeronautics and
Space.Agency's Jet Propulsion LahorutorrJ. This
treatment method was perfected in its exper>imentai
stages with a mobil,e research unit operri.ted by JPL
personnel. at the Districts' Wastewater Treatment
Plant No. 1 in Fountain VaZZey during 1974-750
The system uses sludge removed from the wastewater
to produce activated carbon thr.ough a pyrolysis
r.:actor. The activated carbcn is then l'ei~1tro
(>'.>':i. into the vasteu.,ater stream in a secorr.da:ry
L .. :Je for additional-ren-ova.Z of poZZutantso Only
. partiaHy used after the second stage, the activa-
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 28, 1976
TI ME EX TENS IONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 28, 1976
ted carbon and secondary slud.ge slurr?J 1:s fed into
the inco'ming wastewater stream to increase system
efficiency o
The mobile experimental unit used to refine this
system from laboratory bench experiments was batch
operated zJith mechanical hand.Ung of material from
stage to stage. The p-z:lot p"Uznt will be a aonti.n-
uously run, automated system.
As a prime obcfective of the ACTS, it could solve
an increasing problem of sludge disposal as this
TiateriaZ becomes more plentiful with imp1>oved
wastewate!• treatment and increased rLows. In a.d-
dUion, . the effZuent from this treatment B];/Btem is
expected to meet the discharge requirements of
the Districts 1 Na Po DoEoSo permit a
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Work continuing with out problems.. Most rnaj or equipment has
been delivered~ Filter press and g~avity filters are
operational. Water side of plant is nearly complete for
operational training. Paving south end of plant is
scheduled for early this month. Calciner and related
equipment to be operational by end of month.
>:This contn1ct ia a design and conntl'uot t'!01:tract tJhercby the contractor
i8 pa·id $50~ 000. 00 p7.ua t.lze actual conta foi• a.ii labor and matel'iala.
---\\\t\~ .se-G't'~ \.:> ~E"" ci..eS~ 'T?::>
"'\'ro....) ....,..0.. ~~~\ c... ~oil-~1:" ('/\O~
O\S1. 2
coN\Rf\C\ NO·
2-14-3
CONTRACT 2 -14-3
SANTA AflA RlVER IftTERCEPTOR SEWER fi SOUTH SANTI\ /\NI\
HJVEH INTERCEPTOR CONNECTOR, REACHES 2, 3 & 4
John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contrnctor
STARTING DATE: Oct. 15, 1975
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $3, 814, 462. 00
PAID TO DATE: $00. 00
Contract calls for the construction of a 3.125
' mi.le reinforced conoretc pipe trunk Zinc cewcr a-
long fo Palma Ave. from Grove St. to In.7)eria"l llz,;y.
in /tnaheim.
The first one-third of tha p11 oject uses 51 11 diam-
eter pipe, the balance is 48".
/ 1 :1 included in the cont-ract is a latemt con-
. '.,··.:' Uue to the Santa Ana River Int:crceptor
· i::.: ( m from 300' north of Santa Ana Canyon Rdo a-
long Imperial Hl.iYy. to La Palma Ave. ThiD 2750'
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Nov. 12, 1977
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Nov. 12, 1977
section of 33" diameter vitrified claiJ p1:pe ·is
decigncd to l"eceive flows. from the South Rz:ver
Trunk, E;erving Santa Ana Canyon. Ilith the con:ple-
tion of the South Rivel' Trunk, the Santa Ana Can-
yon pW7iping station can be ahar.donedo
!l.1n:s cectfon of the intereeptor system is designed
to handle up to 35 million gallons flow per dayo
Inctuded in this figure is 30 MGD allowance for
accepting futu11 e high brine waste1.i)ater flows from
San Bernardino and Riversid.E Coimtieso
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
~ontractor is excavating and shoring at the corner of Grove
St. and .La Palma Ave., where the line crosses to the north
side of the street. First pipe was laid ~ebruary 4th.
Tunneling under the Santa Fe Railway tracks.to the east is
scheduled to begin by the middle of the month.
Permission has been obtained to close La Palma Ave. from
Grove St. to Tustin Ave. for approximately one month to
facilitate work in thi3 heavily.travelled portion of roadway.
It is anticipated the contractor will close the street
·beginning the third week in February, possible sooner.
(
C.-ON'l-Q.~c.\'::>~ L(\~1.i6-4'lPE
Si~N& ~~t
GYPSUM
C.ANVON
DI STRICT NO. 2 CONTRACT N 0. 2 -·14 -4
. .
(.
CONTRACT 2-14-4
SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEh'ER, REACH 5
Kasler Corporation & L. II. Woods & Sons, Inc., Contrnctor
ST ARTJ NG DATE: Oct. 15, 1975
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $4,240,957.00
PAID TO DATE: $186,135.50
Contmct io for construction of a 5.1 mile long
section of rc·tnf orced concrete p-z:pe trunk line
sewer from Imperial-Hwy. along La Palma Avco in
Ana7wim, t1'averidng the new Yorba Rcgior.al P(JJ:'k to
Weir Canyon Rd. The right-of-way then crosces the
Santa Ana River at tli}o pl.aces as it traverses
county territory through Santa Ana Val Zey Irriga-
tion Co. and Bryant P.anch properties to Gypsum. Rd.
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 7' 1977
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Da.ys
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 7' J.977
Depending on design c!'iteria, various cections of
this line use 4 2, 4 5 and 51 inch diameter pipe.
This cection wiU handle · fl-ows v.p to :rn miHion
gallons per dayo Ir.eluded in thiD flgurc is 30
J.fGD allowance for accept-fog future high brine
wastewater flows from San Berrun~dino and Riverside
Counties.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
First pipe was laid in the ground Feb. 2nd at Bid Spring St.
and La Palma Ave. Traffic control is in effect in this area
for 1,000' on each side of the work area, limiting flow to
one lane in each direction.
Tree and brush clearing through the river bottom areas and
orange groves along the right-of-way has been completed and
debris hauled away. Natural growth and large trees have been
preserved wherever possible along the pipe l"'oute through the
Santa Ana Valley Irrigatiori Company and Bryant Ranch propertieso
The contractor has erected temporary bridges across the Santa
Ana River in two places for construction vehicle access.
____..
\"'Q-~ ~t.-c~ (.,-S lb~~ ~J-V..
DI ST. 2
CONTRACT No. 2-15
lO
\!)
~
CAL STATE FULLERTON ~
CAMPUS ~
<)
CONTRACT No. 2-15
YORBA LINDA PUMP STATION
J. Putnam Hcnck, A Corporation & Hcnck Pro,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
STARTING DATE: Sept. 26, 197 4
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $671,14 6. 00 .
PAID TO DATE: $592,791.09
Controct iv· for the const-ruction of a reinforced
concrete Gtructure to house wet wells and pwnps
for tmnsfen•ing tributaT"d LKJ.ste-water through a
force m:iin line into the Santa Ana River, Ca:r.bon
CamJon Interceptor-re Uef Trunk Line system for
conveyance to I!asteu..'Clte:r• Reclamation Plant No. 1
in Fountain VaUey. This liJil"l assist in relieving
the presently congested Newhope-Placentia .Trunk
Line and wiZl ser'Ve proposed land use development
of the tributary ariea to the year 2010.
The pump station st?~ctv:re ie located at the in-
tersection of Yorba Linda Bouleva:f'd and Associated
Road in Fu.Zlerton. It is being constructed on
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 22, 1975
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 81 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 10, 1976
liJhat liJa.s or1.:gfoally V>iiverisity of California, Ful-
lerton property at the northern perimeter of tho.
campus. Special arrangements were rrade u.:ith the
Univ~rcity for use of the property.
The above-ground portion of the structure wi lZ be
a low profile slab 85~ x 109', 2 feet above
ground. The deepest portion of the structure will
be 35 feet wuler the ground. The District has
agreed to construct a slump-stone fence around the
st:rn..(.cture and landscape the area in accordance
mth future compatible use by the University. The
Vnive1 1sity plans to construct an arboretum in the
immediate a1 1 ea at some future date.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Since last month, the contractor has completed installation
·or the outside side entrance and stairwell required by the
Edison Company for access by their personnel. The red brick
wall surrounding thr·ee sides of the pump station has been
completed, and decorative sidewalks are partially completed.
Landscape contouring has been completed and wells have been
cut into the sidewalk along Yorba Linda Blvd. for the planting
of decorative trees. Planting operations will begin about
the middle of the month.
Electrical wiring continues, and is now 90% complete, vs. 80%
last month. Inside painting of the structure was begun during
the month and continues~
Still awaiting pump motor deliveries. As reported last month,
manufacturer promised shipment from his factory in Connecticut
on Fe~ruary 15th, with arrival here at the end of this month.
lU ......
~
Q
BELGRAVE
~ STANF"OR.D
' ~
~
V)
CHAPMAN AVE.
N
LAMPSON AVS ..
~AR OEN
DI ST. 3
wwwwCOMPLETE
WE5T
SCHOOL
AVE.
· 8E5TEL AV£. "-----~----~!,. ------. TRASK AVE.
~ ._ -TO BE CONSTRUCTED ~1
CONTRACT
No. 3 -20-1
~ 1-/UM BQL T ~A
tt. --------~ 21 ST. ST. i ~1·-~=====================~
~ ~ WE'STMINSTE~ AV£.
---~------'---~-~~~ -~~--~~~~~-------------------,
CONTRACT . No. 3 -20-1
KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 5 AND 6
Sully-Miller Contracting Company, Contractor
STARTING DATE: Oct. 31, ~974
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $4,602,992.00
PAID TO DATE: $4,606,364.87
Contract is for installation of a 66 11 Reinforced
. Concrete Pipe (R. C.P.) trunk line frnm the inter-
section of Goldera.Jest Street and ~!estminster Ave-
nue in Westminster to 1200 feet south of Kate l la
Avenue on Knott Avenue in Stanton, a distance of
approxirrately 2. 8 miles. Knott Avenue ie the
northern extension of Goldera.Jest Street.
This projeat is a portion of the Knott Interaeptor
relief system designed to relieve the presently
congested }filler-Hold£r"Trunk SezJer by intercep-
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 31, 1975
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 92 Calendar Da"ys
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 31, 1976
ting flows from the northi.iJest portion of District
3. The southerly terminus of the system is at the
intersection of Brookhurst Street and Ellis Avenue
in Fountain Valley. It will eventually extend to
Imperial. Avenue in La Habra.
This portion of the relief system is designed to
handle a flow of ? 5 mil lion ga Uons per day and
will serve ·the proposed developed land use plan in
the tributary area to the year 2010.
ACTIVI.TIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
JOB COMPIBTED
J l'---~L 1/\/co~1."' ___ 11'---________ .Avr ___ . ~' L ~
--~~~~~~~~e-----~~~~-
~e-~-1'\\IE: ""tAAFi;.~
~ "t"b•l'-llr
\~~F.c;r\at-..\ "P~'/thC:r
\b '!.i oee-Nt:: J>
\'o \NS'~~t-l~'
j,.\ ~€" ANb V'~,..
·DIST. 3
()RANGE
CITY
~ BUENA
~
~ PARK
~ ~
CERRITOS
CITY
CYPRESS
1
g
DEL 6
MO/Iii! 2 g
CITY OF
ANAl-/EIM
LllVDA
AVE.
ROAD
AVE.
ijbcus.::
'ATE LL A { wwwwww COMPLETE ---.L.::~-=-=::..=..=..:=----'i, AVE.
, ... -... TO BE CONSTRUCTED -------------.1
""...___ ____ _
~------
;j
' CONTRACT No. 3-20-2
N
CONTRACT No. 3-20-2
KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 7
A. G~ Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Co.,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
STARTING DATE:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT:
PAID TO DATE:
March 6, 1975
$3,876,870.00
$3, 261, 531. 00
Contract is for instaUation of a Reinforced Con-
. crete Pipe (R. C.P.) seUJer line from a point 1200 ·
feet south of Kate 7:la Avenue on Knott Avenue in
Stanton, north on Knott Avenue to Lincoin Avenue
in Anaheim, a distance of 2. 3 miles. Pipe diame-
ters are 72" for the first 3, 900 feet, 63" for
6, 900 feet and 66" for the remaining 1200 feet of
the project. Flows from this reach wili drain in-
to Contract 3-20-1 to the $Outh.
This project is a portion of the Knott Interceptor
relief cystem designed to relieve the presently
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: March 6, 1976
TI ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: March 6, 1976
congested ~filler-Holder Tnunk Seu-1er by intercep-
ting flows from the northwest portion of District
3. The southerly terminus of the system is at the
intersection of Brooklzurst Street ar~ Ellis Avenue
in Fountain I'alley. It un:zz eventu.all.y extend to
Imperial Avenue in I.a Habra.
Thie portion of the re Zief system is designed to
handZe a flow of 68 million gallons per day and
wiZ.Z serve the proposed deveZoped Zand use plan in
the tributary area to t1ze yeru? 2010.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Pipe heading is now at Olinda Ave. and Knott Ave., 2,100 feet
from the end of the job. Traffic control, with one lane in
each direction, now extends from Orange Ave. to Lincoln Ave.
Traffic a~ the pipe heading is open to one lane only, with
flagman control. The situation here is considered critical
and the contractor· and the District engineer have requested
permission from the City of An&heim for permission to close
Knott Ave. to all but local traffic from Orange Ave. to
Lincoln Ave.
Pipelaying is completed across the intersection of Orange Ave.
and Knott Ave., and should be paved bJr the night of the board
meeting. All liner plate is in and spark tested as far north
as Savannah Ave. ·
Tunneling operations at the railroad crossing south of Ball Rd.
are complete. The exposed roadway will be paved by the time
the board meets. Tunneling under the flood control channel
north of Savannah Ave. is complete. Backfill and cleanup
operations are underway.
The contractor will begin excavations in the intersection of
Ball Rd. and Knott Ave. February 10th for installation of a 12"
connector sewer and trunk line vent. This operation will last
approximately 2 weeks.
~ -~E"C-.b~~ l-U.le-5' ""r-::.
~e-eo"°' ~-,-el>
DI ST. 3
_!11111:1,....:mm COMPLETE
JEii r:n ma TO BE CONSTRUCTED
CONTRACT
No. 3-21-1
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
LlA AVG'.
~ <:)
~ ~ '-'
~
~
)'(
~
~
FARGUl-IA~ AllE.
CONTRACT No. 3 -21 -1
WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR,
REACHES 25, 26 & PORTION OF 27
A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Company,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
STARTING DATE: June 26, 1975
$1,416,448.00
$1,417,834.14
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 22, 1976
ORIGINAL CONTRACT:
PAID TO DATE:
Contrac~ is for the installation of a Vitrified
Clay Pipe (V.C.P.) sewer> from the vicinity of the
District's flestside Lift Station, . 1800 feet tJest
of Seal Beach Boulevard and I.mrrpson Avenue along
the flood control channel, along the ohanneZ. to
Seal Beach Bouleva:t'd whe:r>e it turns north along
Los Alamitos Boulevard (the no:r>the1'7l extension of
Seal Beach Boulevard.) to Katella Avenue. It tlzen
tz.TnS east on Katezia to Lexington Drive, where it
tenninates. Pipe diameter is 39" for the first
5, 500 feet, 36" for the next .5, 700 feet and 30"
for the final 5, 200 feet. Total. Z.ength is approx-
imately 3.1 miles.
This project is a continuation of the Westside
Relief Intc:r>cepto:r> sewer which begins at the Seal.
Beach Boulevard Pumping Station at the intersec-
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 qalendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 22, 1976
tion of Seal Beach Boulevard and Westminster Ave-
nue in the City of Seal Beach. The system wiZZ.
eventually run generally in a northerly direction
through the western portion of District 3 and will
terminate at Cresent Avenue and Moodij Street in
the City of La Palma.
Upon completion, the system will relieve the Los
AZamitos Subtrunk Sewer which, at present, func-
tions as the main interceptor sewer for the West-
side basin and, for the most part, is currently
]lowing at or ner.w peak capacity.
This portion of the 2?elief interceptor is designed
to handZ.e flows of up to 14.? million gallons per
day and wiZl serve the proposed developed land use
pl.an in the tributary area to the year 2010.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Relocation of an existing 20" force main to the Westside Lfft
Station that was in conflict with the new trunk line has been
completed. The final section of trunk line at the south end
of the project has been installed, and all underground
facilities of the new line inspected and accepted by the
District engineer.
Five local sewer line interceptors remain to be connected to.
the trunk line at Bloomfield St., Orangewood Ave., Bradbury
Rd., and Katella Ave. (2) to complete.the job by the end of
February.
The contractor will slurry seal the number one northbound lane
on Los Alamitos Blvd. in the· City of Seal Beach at his cost
because of heavy surface scoring caused by his equipment
during operations.
f I
S UMMARY
TREATJVJENT PLANT WORK
Total Value Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Tot a l Work During January
Total Work Awaiting Award
DI STRICT TRUNK LINE WORK
Total Value Under Contract
Total Work t o Date
Tota l Work During January
TOTAL AMOUNT UNDER CONTRACT AND
AWAITING AWARD
$29 ,8 76 ,000
23 ,320 ,979
592,347
293 ,969
$21 ,922,552
10 ,069 ,258
363,942
$29 ,876 ,ooo
293 ,969
$21 ,922 ,552
$52 ,092 ,521
!T:.H. Cir C /\lir0~J~l.'.-Tt:( J.[50UP.CE5 AGENCY
SYATE \'./ ATi:R P.ESOUr~CES CONTROL BOARD
P, o. DOX 100 • SACRAMENTO 95801
JAN 2 9 1976
Mr. Ray Remy
Exec utive Director
Southern California Association
of Gover nments
600 S. Comm onwealth Avenue, Suite 1000
Lo s Angeles, CA 90005
; ..
Agenda Item No. 6(b)
£DJ.I.UNO G . BROWN JR., G<•vorn or
In Reply Refer
To: 40l:BD
DESI GN ATION OF THE SOUT H COA ST 208 PLANNING AREA
The State Water Resources Control Board, at its January 22 meet ing,
de s i gnate d the boundaries of the South Coast 208 p l a n n ing area and
desi gnate d, subject to conditions, the S out hern California
As so cia tion of Gove rnme nts as the 208 planning agency for the
area.
Enclos ed are copies of the Board's designation resolution, "Program
for Development and Imp lement at ion of Areawide Waste Tr eatment
Management Plans--Part I, Designated Areas and Agencies", and the
staff "Ampli ficat ion of Po licy on 208 Planning in Designated Areas ".
Th ese latt er two it ems are referenced in the conditions of desig-
nation. This ma terial was provided informally to Messrs . Holden
and Mag istrale of your staff following the January 22 State Board
meeting .
I call your attention to those conditions of designation which
must be fulfilled \.vi.thin 90 days of the date of the Boar d's desig-
nati o n. In making the designation, Board Members expressed the
position that there sho uld be no extension of the 90-day per i od .
It is, the refore , imperat ive that you concentrate your initial
efforts on this portio n of the conditions of designation.
In recognition o f your age ncy's statements and the concern of
loc a l governments , the Board also spec i fied that your submittal
in fulfil lment of the 90-day conditions must include an approxi-
mation of the total dollar amount of antic i pated 208 grant funds
th a t ·will be required for direct support of SCAG staff and the
general duties that would be performed by that staff.
You will note that the Board's designation reso lutio n directs
th at I am to transmit this designat i on to EPA for considerat ion of
approval and funding after the Board has approved the manner a nd
substance of your o.gency ' s compliance with the condition~ o f
designation. The Board recognizes th at willful noncooperation
,,
Mr. Ray Remy -2-JAN .29 19 75
on the part of other agencies can impede your ability to comply
with the conditions of designation. Accordingl y, t h e Bo ard h a s
instructed that I notify the major units of gover nm ents of the
Board's expectation and strong desire for their coope ration with
you in meeting the conditions of designation.
Should you have any questions, please contact Bill Davis of our
planning staff.
1~~~~~~~
Executive Officer
Enclosures (3)
cc: See attached list
Agenda Item No. 6(b)
EXHIBIT A
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
RESOLUTION NO. 76-1
January 22, 1976
CONDITIONS OF DESIGNATION
Following are the general conditions prescribed by the Board for
the designation of the South Coast Areawide Planning Area and the
designation of the Southern California As sociat io n of Governments as
the planning agency for the South Coast Areawide Planning Area.
Specific conditions also are pre scribed by the Board and follow the
general conditions. If the designated agency comp lies with these
conditions to the sat isfaction of the Board, the designation will
be forwarded to EPA for approval. If the Board determines that the
designated agency has failed to comply with conditions prescribe d
at the time of designation by the Board, the Board will terminate
its designation and assume responsibility for the required planning
in the area. ·
General Conditions:
A. Within 90 days of the date of designation by the State Water
Resources Control Board, the designated planning agency shall
submit to the Board for approval:
(1) A description of the procedures and process that will
be used to:
(a) Integrate areawide waste treatment management
planning and air quality ma intenanc e planning
activiti es for purposes of workplan preparation;
(b) Ensure consistency between the areawide waste
treatment management plan and air quality
maintenance plan(s);
(c) Provide for coordinated i mplementation of areawide
waste treatme nt management and air quality
maintenance plans.·
This description shall include the a greeme nts exe cuted with
the major units of government needed to implement the
procedures and process and evidence that those governments
endorse the procedures and process. As used herein, major
units of government shall mean at le ast those agencies·
listed in Specific Condition A.
(2) Description of the intergovernme ntal relationships that
will exist during the planning process, including :
(a) Definition of the decision-making process, including
the provisions for conflict resolution during plan
development and approval phases;
(b)
(c)
( d)
2
Definition of the roles of local general-purpose
governments, regional agencies, and special districts
during plan development and approval, in the selection
and evaluation of alternative plans, and in selection
of the final management plan;
Executed a greements with major units of governme nt
necessary to implement the intergovernmental relation-
ships -and evidence that those units of government endorse
and agree to participate in suc h relationships.
The interg overnmental relationship s e s tabli.shed for
the planning process shall provide that agencies
responsible for the collection, treatment, and/or
disposal of sewage sha ll certify that those portions
of the areawide plan which specify sewage collection,
treatment, and disposal s y stems or facilit i es are the
optimum system or facilities for the area and that
implementation of the areawide plan will not delay the
construction of waste treatment and disposal facilities
needed to meet an order of any Regional Water Quality
Control Board, or the State Water Resources Control
Board, or which may b e needed to imple ment further the
applicable basin water quality control plan or meet the
requirements of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.
Where such certification cannot b e given, the reasons
for noncertification s hall be specified to the desig-
nated planning agency, together with the change s which
must be made in order to obtain such certi f ic a tion.
This requirement may be waived by the Board if the
Board determines that suc h certification is not in the
best interests of environmental protection in the South
Coast Areawide Planning Area or any portion the r e of.
(3) Description of the program management structure that the
designated agency will use to manage and direct the plan-
ning process, including:
(a) Definition of the roles and relations hips between all
involved organizational units within the designated
agency;
(b) Definition of all advisory committees that will be
formed, their relations hip and access to the decision-
making pro c ess, and the recommended membership of
each advisory committee;
(c) Definition of the procedures to be used in soliciting
proposals for work and selection of consultant services;
I'
3
. (d) Definition of the duties, authorities, and minimwn
qualifications of the 208 Project Manager and the
procedures to be used in selection o·f the Proje ct
Manager.
(e) Evidence of concurrence in the program management
structure by major units of government.
(4) Description of the planning approach that will be used in
formulating the areawide plan, including:
(a) The means and methods for incor poration of ·land use
considerations to ·ass ure that land use planning
recognizes air quality and water quality constraints;
(b) The means and methods for inc orporation of the results
of planning by utility agencies (e .g ., water supply,
waste tre atment and disposal, transportation, and
energy) in deve lopment of the plan;
(c) A description of the means and methods for assess ing
the social, economic, and environmental impact of
implementing existing and alternative land use-utility
service plans;
(d) The specific issues that will be addres sed during the
planning program;
(e). Evidence of concurrence in the planning approach by
major units of government.
(5) Description of the procedures and arrangements for coordi-
nating areawide planning with other major planning and
management efforts in the area including , b ut not limited
to, municipal waste treatment faci l ity planning under
Section 201, regional water quality control p l anning u nder
Section 303(e), solid waste management planning, and coastal
zone management planning.
Such procedures shall not duplicate such efforts and shall
not delay implementation of such plans.
B. In addition to the·fore go ing, the Southern California Association
of Governments shall at all times:
(1) Comply with the provisions of, and execute all agreements
required by, the Board's "Program for Development and
Implementat ion of Areawide Waste Treatment Management
Plans --Part 1, Designated Areas and Agencies" and the
"Amplification of Policy on 208 Planning in Des i gnat ed
Areas" dated November 25 , 1975. The subject po licy
requires, among other things, the establishment of a
Program Review Board consisting of state and EPA repre-
sentatives.
4
(2) Closely coordinate its planning process with the appro-
priate Re g ional Water Quality Control Board and make
adequate provision for Regional Board participation in
the planning process.
(3) Con ce ntrate the scope of the planning on development of
management co nt rol s for nonpoint sources not provided in
basin water quality control plans and coordination of
water and air quality with land use deci s ion-making to
achieve water and air quality goals and standards •
. (4) As sume as a g iven for the planning process that water
quality standards shall be attained and. with re spect to
factors external to the designated area, planning by the
State and enforcement action by the Regional Boards will
control such factors so that standards shall be achieved
at the boundaries of the 208 area.
(5) Assure that the form and content of the water quality
control .and management portions of the areawide plan are in
a form which is acceptable to, and can be adopted by , the
appropriate agency including the Regional Water Quality
Control Bo a rd, and shall conform to the provisions of federal
and state law and regulation.
c. If the agreements and concurrences required by these condit ions
are not obtainable, the designated agency shall define the
deficiencies and shall provide a full description of the reason
for lack of such agreements or concurrence.
Specific Conditions
The followin g specific conditions shall apply toget her with the
foregoing genera l conditions as indicated below.
A. The Southern California Association of Governments shall prov ide
for full participation and concurrence of at least the following
agencies in the pla nning process and shall specifically name
these agenc i es in the submittals required by t h e General
Conditions of the designation :
• Counties of Lo s Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, and Riverside
• City of Los An geles
• County Sanitation Di stricts of Los Angeles County
• Orange County Sani tat ion Districts
• Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority
• Metropolitan Water Di strict
• Los Angeles County Flo od Control District
' .
5
• California Regional Water .Quality Control Boards, Los
Angeles, Santa Ana, and San Diego Regions
• South Coast Air Basin Air Quality Maintenance Planning
Policy Task Force
• Newport-Irvine Waste Mana g ement Planning Agency
B. The Southern California Assoc iation of Governm e nts shall
coordinate its planning process with the process being used
by the County of Los An ge l es in preparation of the latter's
general plan. The procedures and process required under the
gene ral conditions of designation shall include the procedures
for such coordination.
C. The Southern California As soc iation of Government s shall
execute a n agre ement with the Ventura Regional County
Sanitation District for the conduct of planning in the
Ventura County portion of the area. Such a gr eement shall
be executed within 90 days of the date of desig nation by
the State Water Re so urces Control Board.
D. Membership in the Southern California Associati on of Governments
shall not be made a condition of participation in the planning
process resulting from this designation.
E. Adequate opportunity s hall be provide d for the pa rticipat ion
of affected parties i n the planning pro cess .
F. Prepara tion of the a r eawi d e plan shall be coordinated with
the South Coast Air Bas in Air Qu ality Ma intenance Pla nning
Policy Task Forc e , the p l anning pro gram of the Ca lifornia
Department of Water Reso ur ces , the planning programs of t h e
California Regional Water Qua lity Control Boards--Los Angeles ,
Santa Ana, and San Diego Reg i o n s , and t he Me t ropolita n Water
Di strict. Th e procedures and process required under the ge n e r a l
conditions of desi gnation shall include the procedures for
coordination with the programs nam ed in this condition .
I /·1<
. . / . j'
. /, •.,, .\i
/ ... -~ '·. ~
COALlllGA\\.
-,:·-.__.,,._..,r·..._
~""""'t:. ) . ...., -~ ~ ~. ,,,...-· ~ -_,, .....
"""~ ~
. '-
~'
> ·p~ -,
... ~ ... ~
t .. ' "_: "-~ '.
'-'~ .,,
' -. ·~ ..
• .. >. •.
·,',.-1\··
... .
("
\:
7
~
(> ..
... .. .. ., ...
·~=""' ~ •. . ·o:..·.··
··'
• .... I
:.',,
PA~MP
.\. ... \~ ... ,
~, .......
a.. .. , .. .........
R 0
( ./ .. --,"-.. , .. ~ .
\
I \\
f
' I
'>
' ' { ,
' \ ' ..
', ' ' . ..... ' .... ·'.. \
" I 'c ... \
. -'
•
.... ,J
(/)
C"OCllWALLA •
:::0 i-3
tz:j > .•
0
•.
,.... ~~E
llll~ERIAL ... •' ~ . ' . '
-···ti
(/) i-3
~ 0 tz:j )>L'C"l
zc:o~
C:i-3:.:::::r>
)> H i-3 i-3 tz:j
:::0 0 :::0 t=.i >< ~zo~::r:
L' H
l\.) z :::0 to
l\.) 0 tI:I tz:j H
... • 0 CJ) i-3
...... -..J~gt:D '° ()\ t::1 :::0 -..J I o
()\...... tz:j
CJ)
' ( ·; IJA~-·---------~-------
!=" '(
LAW OFFICES
RICHARD O. FRAZEE
STEPHEN C.STEWART
THOMAS L. WOODRUFF
.JEFFREY A. HARTMAN
Stewd rt, '\T ooJ ruff & frazee
Mr. Fred A. Harper
General Manager
1055 NORTH MAIN STREET, SUITE 1020
SANTA ANA, CALI FOR NIA 92701
February 4, 1976
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Re: Proposed Land Exchange -Jane Ayers
District No. 2
Dear Fred:
AGENDA ITEM #6(c)
AR EA CODE 714
835-6212
I have reviewed the letter of January 26, 1976 submitted by
Jane Ayers to the District which I have considered as a counter
offer on her part to the terms and conditions which we recom-
mended to the Boards of Directors on January 6, 1976.
I have, this date, also conferred with Mrs. Ayers at length
concerning the provisions set forth in her letter as compared
with the· conditions outlined in my memorandum of January 6th.
I further pointed out to her that the position of the District
was that we had received a general request from her to exchange
property of approximately equal quantity to establish a squared
property line approximately perpendicular to Brookhurst Street.
I further indicated that the Directors had authorized staff
to proceed on this basis and, therefore, the conditions of
Mrs. Ayers paying legal fees, appraiser fees, dedicating right
of way to the City of Huntington Beach and ultimately being
responsible for the improvement of the street frontage, were
conditions which neither you, as General Manager, nor I, as
General Counsel, could waive.
During the course of our dicussion, she indicated that she
had made a tentative agreement with Covington Brothers, prior
to the District's acquiring our present parcel, whereby
Covington would provide all of the necessary transfers, dedi-
cations, improvements and those items essentially being
requested of Mrs. Ayers by the District at this time. She,
therefore, expressed her concern that the District was not
making an offer essentially similar to that proposed by
Covington Brothers. In turn, she indicated that she was
Mr. Fred A. Harper
February 4, 1976
Page Two
not prepared to pay the District for appraisal and legal services
in connection with this proposed transfer, but would pay for the
engineering and survey costs.
I indicated to Mrs. Ayers that the improvement of Brookhurst
Street along the frontage of the property she would receive in
this proposed exchange could likely be deferred until such
time as she actually develops the property. I further indi-
cated that the District had no legal obligation to make those
improvements at this time, but that we were voluntarily entering
into an agreement with the City of Huntington Beach for improve-
ment of other frontage southerly of the exchanged area.
Lastly, I indicated that I did not feel that the District would
sponsor the application for a zone change for the area which
she would receive. I did indicate that I would recommend that
the exchange be contingent upon her successfully obtaining the
requested zoning of R-3 from the City, but that the obligation
should essentially be hers. I would not envision that the
zone change application would be either difficult or time-
consuming and, therefore, would not be a burden upon either
Mrs. Ayers or the District to pursue.
In view of the fact that her letter dated January 26, 1976
effectively constitutes a counter offer, I would recommend
that it be brought to the attention of the Directors in
order that they may accept, reject or propose a counter-
counter offer. We will then be able to proceed in accordance
with the Directors' decision. In the meantime, no further
work will be done to effect the exchange.
TLW:ab
Enclosure
Very truly yours,
~
Thomas L. Woodruff
General Counsel
Mr. Thomas L. Woodruff
.1'\ttorney at Law
1055 North Main Street, Suite 1020
Santa lU1a, Ca. 92701
January 26, 1976
Re: Property exchange with Sanitation District
Dear Mr. Woodruff:
~s pursuant to our conversation on January 14, 1976, at
the Meeting of the Joint Administrative organization, the
proposed land exchange as set forth in the Memorandum is
unacceptable. ..
However, I still desire to exchange the land, but on a mut-
u~lly equitable bases, such proposed conditions are as
follows:
1. That the amounts as indicated in the Memorandtm
where the Sanitation District is to convey 3700 square feet,
of which 1786 square feet is presently dedicated for street
widening leaving a net of 1~14 square feet and I convey
1917 square feet to the Sanitation District, is acceptable.
2. That since the parcel held by the Sanitation Dist-
rict is zoned R-0, and my property is zoned R-3, any exch-
ange is to be conditioned on the agreement that the Sanit-
ation District, at their expense have that portion of land
to be conveyed to me, rezoned R7.3 so that it shall conform
with the remainder of my parcel of property.
3. That since the parcel I would receive is contiguous
with the street of Brookhurst, it would necessaril~~ result
in the fact that as the owner I \vould incure an obligation
to improve t:he boundry with the street for ~urb.s, gutters,
paving and etc at such time as the land would be improved.
There, however, would be no such costs incurred by the
District upon receipt of the land I would convey to District.
In essence then I would be relieving t~e District of an
obligation that they are presently liable for. Therefore,
the Sanitation District must agree to reimburse or indemnify
or pay for a portion of the cost to improve that portion of
l~nd which are to be conveyed.
4. That since I had tentatively agreed to pay for
surveying costs, I shall consent to that.
Page 2
Jan• 26 I 1976
5. That all other costs shall be paid for and by the
Sanitation District.
6. That no other conditions or encumbrances be placed
upon either parcel to be conveyed, ie.·improving my land
when the district so does.
The above conditions, except paragraph No. two (2)
are negotia~le, i€ it may be necessary to have a mutual
acceptable exchange by both parties.
If you have any other alternatives or suggestions
please contact me or my son who's phone number is ME 41625
(213) during day, so that we may discuss such suggestions
before the next meeting of the Joint Sanitation Board
which as I understand is February 11, 1976. If such date
is wrong please inform me of the exact date for such
meeting. Q.rs,
AYERS
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
2-11-76
REPORT ON THE CASA MEETING IN INDIAN WELLS, THE OTHER
DIRECTORS WHO ATTENDED WERE LEONARD MAcKAIN AND DoN Fox.
REPORT ON THE PENDING MEETING FOR THE FORMATION OF AN
ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF LOCALLY ELECTED OFFICIALS TO THE STATE
WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD,
No EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY,
NOTE: IN THE EVENT CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRE AN EXECUTIVE
COMMITTEE MEETING, INVITE 2 DIRECTORS: -~,;ii+<
ROBERT BATTiN
EDWARD BYRNE
DALE CHAPUT
RALPH CLARK
SUMMARY OF DISTRICT'S ACTIONS
RE PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. S09,
AMENDING CONNECTION AND USE
ORDINANCES NO. SOS, AS AMENDED,
AND ORDINANCE NO. S08
At an adjourned meeting on December 11, 197S, the Board of Directors, following
a review of five-year increased funding requirements brought about by the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act,~the California State Ocean Plan and
other factors,vdeclared their intent to increase connection fees. o,Mc 0;-tJt ·' l.P\IAJ., i.,., \) ~ IN,.,\ r.L~ s,,""e,.,"' Q~ roel.k ,.,J..J'~)
On January S, 1976, pursuant to provisions of existing ordinances, Notic~of
Intent to Adopt Ordinance No. S09, Amending Connection and Use Ordinances No.
SOS, as amended, and Ordinance No. S08, and setting forth the hearing dates
therefor, were mailed to existing permit holders, and the City of Newport Beach.
On February S, 1976, Agendas of the hearing and copies of the proposed ordinance
were mailed to lS directors and others ~the District's mailing list.
/'.r ~~· 'l'I OtJ ~To date.lwe have received no written connnents.
<\'oN·~~l l,,w,",rl 1 ~ scl L'r J ~~ ~--~ ~-\ vJ ~~-1 •ic 0 ~
J ·-c--L le> I 141 {.. 'C) :;.( L, ,_c L. ~ ~ ~l l~~~ ,, l ,.....) ~ rJI. (
fVi/N ' I ' d ' t (',
()IF l 1#.Jfl r '-Nii Sb( h-Nd -"\...·'-A-~Q . '(!;.' ,,;..",c. Vt o ~-
MEMORANDUM
February 9, 1976
TO: Members of the Boards of Directors
FROM: Donald Fox, Chairman
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
Selection Committee for Procurement of Professional Services
On Thursday, February 5th, the Corrunittee met with staff and a result of
this meeting is the enclosed recorrunended procedures. The Committee
recognizes that these procedures should be reviewed within a period of
from six to nine months a.nd with changes or modifications made as
necessary.
A verbal report will be given at the Joint Boards Meeting of February 11th
to fully explain, in more detail, the Committee'·s recommendations~
DF:REL:hje
A POLICY OF TIIE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 AND 11 OP ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR THE SELECTION
OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURAL
SERVICES
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY ESTABLISH THESE PROCEDURES FOR THE SELECTION AND PROCUREMENT OF
ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES:
Section 1. Selection of Engineering and Architectural Firms.
In the selection of a consulting architect or engineer, it must be realized that
no two firms or consultants have equal training, experience, skill, capabilities or
work loads to meet the demands of any contemplated project. There are six major
areas that will be used in the evaluation to select an architect or engineer:
A. The firm shall be of high ethical and professional standing, its
members being of good moral character, and it shall be prepared to
submit references from persons of known repute.
B. The principal and other responsible members of the firm must be
registered in the State of California.
C. A principal member of the firm's staff must have at least ten years'
recent experience in responsible charge of work of the type involved
in the project.
D. At least two additional members of the firm's staff must have at
least five years' experience in responsible charge in the field, or
fields, required by the project.
E. If all other factors are equal, preference shall be given to a local
.firm when more than one firm is being considered.
F. A firm selected where the fees are greater than $10,000, must certify
as to an affirmative action program.
Section 2. Scope of the Project.
For every project, regardless of the size, approved by the Board(s), and for
which outside professional services are required, the staff shall develop a
comprehensive scope of the project. The scope shall define, in detail whenever
possible, the extent of the professional services, the time required, and shall
develop a maximtun fee for the services sought. This scope of work shall be sub-
mitted to the Board(s) when requesting authority to solicit proposals. The maximum
fee amount shall not be made public, but will be available to the Board members
upon request.
Section 3. Selection of Engineer,
A. Projects where services are less than $10,000,
Projects where the professional fees are less than $10,000 are usually
specific, small projects normally requiring specialization in one or
two fields of endeavor. Staff shall select that firm who appears best
qualified for the project. Negotiations for compensation to the firm
shall be conducted between the consultant, the Districts' Chief Engineer
and the Districts' Project Engineer. The recommendation for selection
will be submitted to the Board(s) for their approval. The evaluation
of the consultant's qualifications and the fee negotiations will not be
made public but will be available to any Director upon request.
B. Projects where services are greater than $10,0·00 but less than $100,000.
Staff shall select at least two known firms that appear to be best
qualified for the project. Each firm, after being thoroughly informed
.as to the scope of the project and the extent of the services required,
shall submit to a Selection Committee two sealed envelopes. One
envelope, clearly identified as ·"Consultant's Qualifications", shall
contain the qualifications and records of the firm, the capabilities
to complete the work within the time allotted, the specific key
personnel assignable to the project, and other information as may be
required to properly evaluate the firm's qualifications. The second
envelope shall be clearly marked "Charges for Consulting Services".
A Selection Conunittee, comprised of the Joint Chairman of the Boards
of Directors, or the District Chairman, or their designee, the
Districts' Chief Engineer, Director of Finance and Superintendent,
shall review the qualifications of each consultant, checking with
recent clients if necessary, determining the quality of performance.
Each firm being considered shall be listed in order of desirability,
taking into account location, reputation, experience, financial
standing, size, personnel availability, quality of references, work
load and other factors peculiar to the project being considered.
To determine the compensation for the services sought, the following
will be strictly adherred to:
1. Invite the firm that is considered to be the best qualified
to appear before the Selection Committee.
2. In the presence of the consultant, the Selection Conunittee
shall open the second envelope marked "Charges for
Consulting Servicesn. The compensation requested by the
consultant shall be compared with the maximum fee as
previously established. The final negotiated fee, as recom-
mended to the Board(s) of Directors, shall be certified by
the Selection Committee and approved by the General Manager
as reasonable for the services requested and not resulting
in excessive profits for the consultant.
2.
3. If agreement is. not reached, the negoti_a,ti.ons: should be termin-.
ated and similar interviews· should then follow with the second
firm. All such negotiations shall be on a strictly confidential
basis and in no case shall the compensation discussed with one
consultant be discussed with another, or made public.
4. After reaching successful negotiations with a firm, the firm(s)
which have not been interviewed for the purpose of compensation
negotiations shall have the second envelope, marked "Charges for
Consulting Services" returned unopened. The return of the
unopened envelope is essential for the District(s) to maintain
creditability with the professional community.
C. Projects where services are greater than $100,000.
The same procedure as outlined for services between $10,000 and $100,000
shall be used except as follows:
1. Adequate public notice shall be given by the publication of a
notice of request for proposals which shall appear in profes-
sional journals or publications of general circulation. The
extent of the circulation of the publications shall be at
least Statewide. The advertisement shall request written
proposals for qualifications only.
2. A Screening Conunittee, which shall also act as the Final
Selection Conunittee, comprised of the Chairman and Vice Chairman
of the Joint Boards, or their designee, the Districts' General
Manager, Chief Engineer, Director of Finance and Superintendent,
shall select at least three firms who appear best qualified for
the particular project. In the case of professional services
for the individual District(s), the Chairman of that District or
his designee shall substitute for the Chairman and Vice Chairman
of the Joint Boards on the Selection Committee.
Each firm so selected shall be ranked to desirability, and
negotiations shall be similar to those as set forth for projects
where fees are between $10,000 and $100,000.
Section 4. Continuation of Services.
In some cases, where a consulting firm has satisfactorily completed one phase
in the development of a project and the Boardls) determine that it might be in the
best· interest to retain this firm for subsequent phases of work, then the Selection
Committee can proceed directly with the negotiations for compensation with this
consultant. This would be particularly true when a firm has completed a feasibility
report or a master plan report and the services as provided for said report are
satisfactory to the Board(s), then the procedure of examining other consultants
would not be necessary and the Selection Committee would proceed with the negotiations
for compensation for subsequent phases. In the event that satisfactory negotiations
for price cannot be reached, then the provisions set forth hereinabove would apply.
3.
Section 5. Compensation for Engineering ·and Architectural Services,
When the scope of the project can be well defined and the individual elements
of the engineering cost well defined, a lump sum payment, fixed fee or per diem
rates with a maximum contract shall be written. The agreement for payment to the
consultant on this basis must clearly state the scope and the time limits in which
the services must be performed. The agreement should provide for fee adj«1stments
should there be changes in the scope of work. Progress payments made to the
consultant during the time the se'.i.."Vices are being supplied shall be on a percentage
of the work completed to date, as approved by the Districts' Cfiief Engineer and
reconunended to the Board(s) of Directors for payment.
When the scope of the project cannot be well defined, such as in the prepar-
ation of engineering studies, feasibility reports, master plan reports, etc ,,
contract shall be on the basis of per diem rates for the various classifications
as required, with a maximum amount assigned to the contract.
If it is the decision of the Selection Committee to use other methods for
compensation other than the lump sum or fixed payment, or the per diem rates with
a maximum, justifications for this decision shall be made by the Selection Committee
in their recommendation to the Board(s) of Directors for the consulting services.
Section 6. Term of Selection and Procurement Procedures.
This policy shall become effective on February 11, 1976 for a period of at
least six months and no longer than nine months from the effective date . These
procedures shall be reviewed within said six to nine month period with modifications
or changes reconunended to the Board(s) for subsequent policy procedures.
4.
MEETiiffi DATE February 11, 1976 TI ME 7 : 30 p. m. DISTRICTS 1, 2. 3 s 6 z & 11
DISTRICT 1
RI MA. • • • • • • • {)_, ~D ~R~CH) •••..• BATTIN..... v == ==
E~NS .••.•••••• GARTH E • • • • • "
SHARP •••••••••• SAL TAR ELLI. " == ==
DISTRICT 2
(LYONS). · · · • • • • • • CAL LAH.AN. • • ./
EWING) .....••••• CHAPUT •.•••• -./-----
DIEDRICH) •••••• CLARK ••••••• -v..,-----
GARTtiEl. ..••••. EVANS....... .; == ==
THOt-1) ..•..••.••• KAYWOOD •••• _., ____ _
FOX) .......••••• MAC KA IN. • • '
JACKMAN) ••••••• PEREZ....... ~ == ==
PERRY •• ~~··-'-___ _
!SVALSTAD) •••••• SCOTT./~ •• _v ____ _
DUNN[:) •••••••••• WINN. ·fJ ·j ... -" _ __
WARD) ••••••••••• WOOD .• \:" ••••• ---7-== _
GRAHAM} ••••••• ~ YOUNG ••••••• _____ _
DISTRICT 3
(HOMRIGH(\USEN). COX ......... _v __
1
_-1 __ _
(COLL I NS) ••••••• BYRNE ••••••• _6.w_ _6_ __
CULVER. ••••• ~ _-__ _
~GRIFFHJL .•.••• BA-¥+8:' ••.•.• ~1~ __
GARTH EL ••••••• EVANS ..••••. _L_ _+ __ _
M KAIN) •••••• FOX .•..•••.• _v __ +-__ _
!NE'V'I LJ .......... GRAHAM ••••• __ ,_,. _-1. ___ .
THOM) ••••••••••• KAYWOOD •••• -"-__ -__
,.. ) ./ SONJU ••• \ •••••• MAC LA IN ••• ____ -__
BLACKMANJ ..•••• MC KNEW •••• -"-__ -__
OLSON .•••••• _1 __ .,. __ _
! D I ED R I CH) ••.••• SCH MI T. . . • • • _ft::_ ~ __
G I BBS ). . . • . • . • • • SH I PL E Y. • • • • + QI; -:" __
STANTON) •.•••.• SVALSl;Alj..· .• --; --= __
WOOD) •••••••.••. WARD •• f.a ~ ••• --r _+ __ _
(ARBISOl ••..•••• WEISHAUPT .• ___ + __ _
DISTRICT 5
(RYCKOFF)\ ...... MC INNIS .•• _./. ___ . __ _
(DIEDRICH J •••••• RI LEY •••.••• -'-· _._· _. _.
ROGERS. •••.• __fi!t_ ___ _
DISTRICT 6
(MC INNIS) .•.••• STORE ....... _..; ____ _
(DIEDRICH) .••••• BATTIN. ••••• -"-___ _
. R I MA ••••••.. __!:::___ __ __
DISTRICT 7
E'"'NS ...•••••• GARTHE..... v .l
A..,-HONY) .•••••. BURTON ••.•. -.;--~---
DI EDR IC H) .••.•• CLARK ..•••• ~ fJ-==
\MC INNIS) ...... ~.... ? --= __
--GLOCKNER. • _L_ -
( ~EREZ-l .•••••.•• JACKMAN!'--~. _v_ -==
(SHARP) .••••.•••• SALTARELLI. _..; ___ -__
DISTRICT 11
(DIEDRICH) •..••• SCHMIT. •.••• ___!::__ ___ _
1
DUKE .•••••.• _L_ ___ _
\ w I ED ERL ....... GI BBS ••••.•. _../_ ----
DISTRICT 8
EDWARDS .••• ______ _
(JOHNSON) •..•••• HOLM ..•••••
(DIEDRICH) •••••• RI LEY . ." ••••• ~ == ==
JOINT BOARDS
DI EDR IC~ ..•••• BA TT I N ••••••• _../ _ __
ANTHONY ....•••• BURTON ••••••• _../ __ _
COLLI ~S ....•.•• BYRNE ••.••••• ~ __
L VONS .......••• CALLAHAN .•••• _v __ _
EWING ......•••• CHAPUT ••••••• _.,, __ _
DIEDRICHL ..•.. CLARK •.•••••• a...
HOMRIGHAUS EN) •. COX-• . • • • • • • • • '-' ==
CULVER....... ./
! GR I FF I N ) .••••••• BAV I S-: ••••••• -../---
MC INN Is L ..... OOSTAC ...... -v-,--
GI BBS) •••.•••••. DUKE......... v ==
GARTHE) •....•••• EVANS........ ./
MAC KA IN) ..••••• FOX •••••••••• -v---
(EVANS).········ ·GARTHE· • • • • • • -v---
(WI EDER).······· ·GIBBS········ ./ ==
GLOCKNER • • • • v
!NEVIL) •••••••••• GRAHAM....... v ==
PEREf_) •••••••••• JACKMAN •••••• _./ __ _
THO~) ••••••••••• KAYWOOD •••••• _./ __ _
FOX).\ •••••••••• MAC KA IN •••• _./ __ _
SONJUJ) ••••••••• MAC LA IN •••• _v_ (RY~OFF •.••••.••• MC INNIS. •••• _.,_==
(BLACKMAN) •••••• MC KNEW •••••• -" __ _
OLSON. • . . • • • • .,
(JACKMAN) .••••••• PEREZ •••••••• -.; ---
PERRY .••.••.• -.;---
(DIEDRICH) •••••• RILEY •.•••••• -"---.
RIMA •••••••.• 4-==
ROGERS....... £..
SHARP) •.•••••.•• SALTARELLI •. -./---
D I ED R I CH ) ...•.• SCH M I T. • . • • . . "'-==
SVALSTAD) .••••• SCOTT........ ~
) ----::;7 -GIBBS ••.•..•••. SH I PLEY •.••.•
MC INNIS) ••.••• STORE •••.•••• -v---
STANTON) •.•.••• SVALSTAD •7• J. v1 ==
W 0 0 D ) • • • • . . • • • • • WARD • • • . i /;. -,~ . ..;
ARB ISO) .•••.••••. WEISHAUPT ... -. -v---
DUNN[:) ••••••••.. WINN .•••.•••• v ==
WARD) ••.•.•••••• WOOD......... .t..
GRAHAM) ••••••••. YOUNG.. • • . • • • i/' ==
OTHERS
HARPER
SYLVESTER
LEWIS
CLARKE
TAYLOR
BROWN
I
' l_.
WOODRUFF
EWING
HOHENER
HOWARD
HUNT
KEITH
KENNEY.
LYNCH
MADDOX
MARTINSON
PIERSALL
STEVENS
TRAVERS
--../ --v
-./-
---r-
-./-
J
I.I' 1 _.
MEET I NG DATE February 11, 1976 TI ME 7: 30 p. m. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7 & 11
. ..
DISTRICT 1
RI MA. • • • • . • • 0.... ~DIEDR~CH) ...... BATTIN ..... ~====
.-. NS •••.••.••• GARTH E • • . • • ,__.._..
~lTARP .... ~~SALTARELLI. 1" == ==
DISTRICT 2
LYONS·········· CALLAHAN ••• ~ ___ _
EWING .......... CHAPUT...... ....---
DIEDRICH) ...... CLARK ....... CS:-----
GARTtfEl. ....... EVANS....... v--== -
THO~) ........... KAYWOOD .... __!:::::::_ ___ _
FOX) ............ MAC KAIN... ~ ) --v---JACKMAN ....... PEREZ ....... _____ _
PERRY....... ........-
!SVALSTAD) ...... SCOTT ....... ~== --DUNN~) •••••••••• WINN........ ~ __ ==
WARD) ••••••••••• W&&B~QO:\... ~
GRAHAM) •••••••• YOUNG ••••••• ~ == ==
DISTRICT 3 \O\(c.)
(HOMRIGH~USEN). COX ......... ~ _j__
(COLLINS) ••••••• BYRNE •.••••. _~ ~ ==
CULVER .•••• ~~ __
~GR I FF IN) •.•.••• BAVI & •••••••. ___JL: ~ __
GARTH EL ....... EVANS ....... ~ __
MAC KAIN) ...... FOX ......... __;L_ __
!NEV HJ .......... GRAHAM • .. • • v h _
THOM) ........... KAYWOOD .... ~~ __
SONJU) ••• \ ...... MAC LAIN ... --1.::::::. _DL __
BLACKMANJ •.••.•. MC KNEW .•.. ~ ~ __
OLSON....... a.----s_ __
!
D I ED R I CH ) •••••• SCH MI T ...... ~ a_.
GIBBS) ••••.••••• SHIPLEY. ..•. ~~
STANTON) •••••.• SVALSTAD •.• _k=::::. N __
WOOD) ••••.•••••• ''6ARB.~A<=rc"' •• ~ r-_ __
ARB I SOL ....... WEISHAUPT.. v ~ __
DISTRICT 5
(RYCKOFF)) ...... MC INNIS ... _k""_. _ -·-·
(DTEDRICH ...... RILEY ....... ~-·-__ _
ROGERS...... 0-___ _
DISTRICT 6
(MC INNIS) ...... STORE ....... ~ ___ _
(DIEDRICH) .••••• BATTIN. ••••. ~ ___ _
RIMA........ w ___ _
DISTRICT 7
(EVANS) ......... GARTHE ..... ~ L --(A"'T~ONY) ...•••. BURTON .••.• ~ .i__ --
(D-....tJR I CH) ...... CLARK...... 0... <L
(MC INNIS) ...... B86TAL..... ~ ___}J_ ==
· GLOCKNER •.• ~ _Ji_
(PEREZ) ..••.••.•. JACKMAN.... ~ ___& ==
(SHARP) .......... SAL TA RELL I. __!::::::. -1{. __
DISTRICT li
(DIEDRICH) •...•• .SCHMit-*"_. •. ~ ___ _
(
DUl<E.~~ .,......--___ _
Wil:DERl. ....... GIBBS ....... ~ ___ _
JOINT BOARDS
DIEDRIC~) ...... BATTIN ....... ~_
ANTHONY ........ BURTON....... V' __
COLLI~S ........ BYRNE ........ ~ __
L VONS ...••••••. CALLAHAN ...•• ....k::::_ __
EWING . ")' •••••• CHAPUT ••.•••• ~ __
DIEDRICH ....... CLARK ........ 0-
HOMRIGHAUS EN) .• COX. .••••.•••• ~ ==
· CULVER ••••••• ~--
!GR I FF IN) ........ BAVI S........ ~
MC INN Is L ..... BOSTAL ....... ---;:::::::---
GIBBS) .......... DUKE ......... .....J:::::::_ __
GARTHE) ......... EVANS........ ~
MAC KAINL ..... FOX .......... ~ --
(EVANS).········ ·GARTHE· • • • • • • ~ ==
(WI EDER).······· ·GIBBS········ l/'" __
GLOCKNER •••• ~
!NEVIL) •••••••••• GRAHAM....... .._...---==
PEREf.) •••••••••• JACKMAN.. . • • • ~ ·
THO~) ••••••••••• KAYWOOD •••••• ~ __
FOX) ............ MAC KA IN • .. • V--__
SONJU) .......... MAC LAIN .... V' ~RYCOFF) ••••••••• MC INNIS: .... === ==
BLACKMAN) ...... MC KNEW...... v-__
0 LS 0 N ........ .......L.c:::::
( J AC KMAN ) .••••••• PEREZ • • • • • • • • 1/' ==
PERRY........ ~
(DIEDRICH) •••••• RILEY •••••••. ~==
RIMA ••.•••••• ~ __
ROGERS....... CL.>
SHARP) .......... SALTARELLI .• ~ --
D I ED R I CH ) ...... SCH M I T. . . • • • • CL ==
SVALSTAD) ...... SCOTT........ v--
GIBBS) .......... SHIPLEY ••••.• ~ --
MC INNIS) ...... STORE ........ ___IL' --
STANTON) ....... SVALSTAD .... -1L.. ==
WOOD) ........... WA-Rf) ~t?~:t. . . v-'
ARB ISO) ......... WEISHAUPT .••. V: --
DUNN ) .......... WINN ......... --lL. ==
GRAHAM)::::::::: YOUNG::::::::~ ==
OTHERS
HARPER
SYLVESTER
LEWIS
CLARKE
TAYLOR
BROWN
WOODRUFF
EWING
HOH EN ER
. HOWARD
HUNT
KEITH
KENNEY.
LYNCH
MADDOX
MARTINSOl'l
PIERSALL
STEVENS
TRAVERS
. .
.. '-""
February 17, 1976
TO: Thomas L. Woodruff
General Counsel
MEMORANDUM
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
Section 12 of the Districts' Rules of Procedure for Meetings provides
that voting on all resolutions shall be by roll call vote with certain
exceptions. As you know, with the· exception of Districts 3 and 7, the
Joint Chairman called for a voice vote for those Districts voting on
i tern 12 (c) of the· agenda for February 11. Please advise as to how this
should be recorded. in the minutes· for said item· and the certification of
the vote for the respective resolutions.
JWS:rb
(6-a)
(6-b)
(6-c)
2/11/76 Joint Meeting
Report of the Joint Chairman
Regarding Advisory Committee of Locally Elected Officials to the SWRCB, said
Committee has scheduled a meeting next Wednesday in Sacramento which will be
attended by Wiri Adams and one of his SWRCB members, along with Supv. Rodney Diridon,
Mayor Leonis Malburg, Councilman Lewis Nowell, him (Winn) and an elected representa-
tive from East Bay Municipal Utility District. General Managers from other agencies
will also be in attendance. Said they hoped to get this set up with goals and
objectives and will be of interest to everybody in the State.
Later in the meeting, Chairman Winn called an Executive Committee meeting for
March 24, 1976 and invited Directors Culver and Svalstad to attend. The meeting
was to discuss the compensation of the Joint Chairman.
Report of the General Manager
FAH referred to material in Directors' folders from SWRCB regarding Southern
California Association of Governments. They have been designated as the "208"
Planning Agency for the South Coast area. Reported that in discussing this designation
with the SWRCB, the staff, as well as their members, were very much concerned. Did not
feel that there was adequate testimony during the hearings to indicate that SCAG
should be designated; however, Governer's office felt otherwise. In developing the
conditions of designation, the State Board adopted some stringent requirements for
SCAG. Gave SCAG 90 days to get their act together and come up with various contracts.
Also must integrate the existing plans rather than start new ones. Referred to
pages 4 & S and noted specific conditions where they are asking that there be
submittals required of the designation from the variouS col.lllties as well as our
Districts, SAWPA and NIWA. Said in discussions with SWRCB, they are going to be
right here on this project. Think this is going to be a successful project the
way it is outlined.
FAH also reported that he had previously advised that he was one of three people
working with the EPA people in Washington trying to develop a survey form to
determine what the situation is on sludge throughout the U.S. Said he had a meeting
last week in Washington and they decided to give the AMSA group a grant to develop
a form. Finally gave up and asked AMSA to do it.
Report of the General Counsel
Woodruff advised that one of the subjects of concern for most Directors was the
Conflict of Interest codes. Reported that Attorneys Committee of CASA met a couple
weeks ago for a full day working on conflicts of interest. Said he thought they
had developed a good code. Feel it is better than the code put out by the California
League of Cities. Said once the Board of Supervisors sets the date for special
districts in Orange County to file their code, we will come back to Board with
single code (99% sure this will be a single code) that will cover both employees
and Directors. Will forward to Board of .Supervisors sometime after April. Code is
almost ready for consideration. Said regardless of what may be the Directors'
requirements in their cities or for supervisors, as far as their action as a Director
of the Districts, they need not file a report at this time.
Also reported that the CASA Attorneys Committee has established a screening
committee relative to the que stion of SB 90 reimbursements in the St a te. Wa s
decided that aasically Committee would distribute information on items that
were likely to affect other districts immediately.
Re Jane Ayers land exchange, Woodruff reported on backgrolffid of e xchange and
Mrs. Ayers request. Entered into negotiations and came back to Board last meeting.
Mrs. Ayers has reviewed conditions and has indicated by letter and conversation
with Woodruff that proposal is not acceptable. SAid he was not able to present a
proposal that is ready for adoption. Are looking for some direction from Board if
they are willing to adjust the offer. Said Directors had re~eived copies of Mrs.
Ayers letter a nd his letter. Woodruff then review some of the conditions of the
proposal.
Svalstad then asked if City of Huntington Beach is given property on dedication,
don't they do street improvements? Didn't know.
Woodruff stated that one possibility was that she dedicate land and she pay for
improvements; or project would be bonded, etc. ?? or in exchange for receiving
right of way, City pays cost of improvements.
Svalstad commented that there would not have to be a dedication of property right now.
Woodruff then advised that street improvements are about to begin in frortof the
Plant now. Will stop at northerly edge of Mrs. Ayers property so City probably has
no plans to undertake widening at this point. Woodruff stated that the Districts
haven't spent a lot of time discussing this with the City of Huntjngton Beach because
the Districts would be i ncurring costs without an agreement. Svalstad then said that
the point is that it would be hard for them to make a decision until they knew the
answers to this. Why app roach the problem now if it is not a problem? Woodruff
r eminded that the Directors indicated four months ago that the property exchange
would be of equal value. Directors stated again they want to know policy of H.B.
before they do this.
Mrs. Ayers son, Ron Ayers, then spoke. Said they want the exchange to be equitable.
Said they would take a net amol.ll1t of the square footage of Districts' land in
exchange for theirs. Are willing to accept any cost of the improvements of the
frontage that they will take. Said they are not requesting Districts to pay for it.
Will assume responsibility once it has been dedicated. Said rezoning is their concern.
Gibbs stated this is not a concern of the Sanitation Districts.
Question asked who fil es the application--the District or the new buyer. Woodruff
advised that we have told the City of Huntington Beach that we are improving the
long reach of Brookhurst in front of Plant 2 and that this portion should a lso be
improved. Said they have agreed to that.
Winn asked for a motion .
Ayers said they felt it was fair that the Districts assume the cost of rezoning
since they are going to assume improvements. Woodruff said that since we are owners
at present time, we could file application for zone change. Further stated that
we are improving 4000 feet but have no obli ga tion to improve that 75 feet. Not
realistically saving money by paying rezoning charges. Duke indicated he thought
it would b e silly for Sanitation Districts to request this change.
Saltarelli moved that if is reasonable for Di strict s, think we should pay fees and
th ey pay improvements. Motion seconded.
Chaput stated that if equal as far as appraised value, why should we pay extra . Don't
understand.
-2-
Fox then stated that he objected to this. Not in original agreement. Saw no
reason whatsoever that the District should apply for zone change when we have no
need for zone change. Said Legal Col.Ulsel just stated that appraiser gave us an
appraisal price based on these facts. Woodruff then said he would recommend that
the Districts not request a zone change but agreement should be made contingent
upon a successful z ~ne change. If it doesn't materialize, then deal can collapse.
Would recommend that they be responsible for processing. Seemed most appropriate
that they make the application.
Saltarelli stated that he would include Woodruff's recommendation in his motion.
(that they are responsible for processing zone change)
Mrs. Ayers then spoke for a few minutes and told history of property.
Little more discussion regarding zone change.
Woodruff then restated motion: Said motion would be to direct staff and hjs office
to effeGt an exchange of property between Jane Ayers and the Collllty
Sanitation Districts subject to (1) Mrs. Ayers will file application with City of
Huntington Beach for zone change. (2) District will ass1st in that application·
(3) Exchange of property will be contingent upon Mrs. Ayers successfully obtaining
rezoning. (4) Mrs. Ayers w~ll pay engineering costs for parcel map. (5) District
will pay appraiser and legal fees. (6) Mrs. Ayers responsible for dedication and
street improvements of City of Huntington Beach.
Store said he was in support of that motion. Voice vote. Motion carried.
Directors Duke, Gibbs and Shipley abstained from voting.
CONSENT CALENDAR items removed
(9-n) Svalstad asked for a point of information. Asked if we have the Engineer's
certification that he agrees with this. Ray advised that the consulting engineer
signs all changes. Item was moved, seconded and carried.
(9-t) Jackman wondered if Reaches 14 -were those that tied in with 17 & 18. Asked
if they weren't partially constructed. Also asked what the present need was for
those lines. Decided to defer this discussion to the District 7 business at end
of agenda. Moved & seconded to do so .
(12-b) Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
Svalstad asked why do we go with 77-78 now with cost of living instead of
just one year? Winn answered that the Executive Connnittee discussed this at
length and felt it was in the best interest of the Districts. Svalstad then
asked if we have any choice after one year to terminate this agreement.
Woodruff said we can write the agreement any way . Said most professional
services contracts do call for termination. Can write the contract for 3 years
with right to cancel after one year but don't know if that would affect price.
Perez agreed with Svalstad that we should have some clause for termination if
we aren't satisfied. Also thought we should give other firms an opportllllity.
Winn then directed Woodruff to put something into agreement to satisfy Directors.
It was moved, seconded and carried to receive, file and accept proposal, as amended.
-3-
(12-c) Directors' compensation resolutions
(1) Garthe moved adoption of Resolution No. 76-11-1. Motion seconded.
(2)
(4)
(5)
Woodruff briefly explained resolutions for District 1. Voice vote.
One aye (Garthe) a nd two abstentions (Battin & Saltarelli) Motion failed.
Saltarelli suggested that resolution be brought back to Board because he
had conflic ting ins tructions from his council.
Resolution 76-12-2 moved and seconded. Root read a couple comments from
Director Wood who was absent. She said if this adopted, would make it
possible for Joint Ch a irman to get $700 for two meetings and should not
do this. Also should be $100 per month maximum. These were her comments
not n ecessarily the views of the council. Root added that from his experience
as a Director, there hasn't bee n too much effort to conduct separate meetings
that have to be held . Voice vote. Joint Chairman a nnounced motion carried.
Chaput and Perez indi cated no votes.
Later under District 2 Other busines s (20) Chaput requested a roll call vote
on this res olution because of the importance of the item. Was told it was up
to District 2 Chairman to request it. Chairman Callahan refused to ask for
roll call because the .action was already taken.
Resolution 76-13-3 moved and seconded. McKnew said he was directed by his
council to vote no. MacLain instructed by her council to do same. Svalstad
said same. Will not adopt resolution. Shipley said he would abstain from
this as he would not be on the Board any longer. Culver asked if he voted no
did existing resolution provide for $50 per meeting or per month? Woodruff
answered old r e solution is $50 per meeting -with ma ximum of $100 per month
and new resolution $50 per meeting -with maximum of $200.
Mcinnis stated that by doing nothing would keep resolution as it is . Present
resolution does not address itself to payment for travel. Read suggested
changes to Resolution 76-14-5. It was then moved and seconded to adopt
this resolution as corrected by Mcinnis. Motion carried.
Store moved that the maximum be changed to $100 per month. No second on
that motion. No further action on that item. Resolution 76-15-6 not considered.
(6) Resolution 76-16-7 moved and seconded. Roll call vote. Motion fail ed 4 against,
2 in favor, 1 abs·ent.
RECESS from 9:42 -9:48.
ALL DISTRICTS -Other business ??
Svalstad asked for some discussion on Joint Chairman's compensation. Joint Chairman
referred this to the Executive Committee at their n ext meeting a nd invited
Svalstad and Culver to a ttend. FAH s e t meeting for Ma rch 24.
(16) Special Committee to Review Staff Procedures re Selection of Design Engineers
Fox r eporte d that Connnittee had two meetin gs (for which they were not compensat e d).
First meet ing consisted of some c oncerns and questions relative to co nsultants .
Fo:ri\larded to staff with direction to come back to next Committee meeting and s how
how some of these things could be impl e mente d into a selection program. All Directors
receive d copies of recommendation. To date this is not a perfect document but pretty
-4-
J ('II • -
good. Could be changed in six to nine months when reviewed at that time.
Was moved and seconded to approve recommendations, with compliments. Store
said he thought this was very impressive and very well done. Just had one
question regarding envelope procedure. '!bought first envelope was standard
procedure. Motion carried. (adopted procedures)
Winn then mentioned that many of these special conunittees will not be appointed
no'Clland will be taken up at Executive Conunittee. Said staff came up with this
proposal. Stated that last month they voted an expenditure of $62~ million for
staff and should reaffirm staff reconunendations. Reminded Directors that the
staff was always available if they want any additional information.
(28) DISTRICI' 5 -Irvine Ranch Water District letter
Mc!nnis asked what we were going to do with it if we received & filed the letter?
FAH said there isn't any adoptive policy of the Board. Mcinnis said to receive
and file and ask staff to set up a meeting with District 5 and IRWD representatives
to attempt to come up with reasonable set of conditions for possible annexation.
Motion seconded.
Burton asked if inquiry from IRWD to annex that area was to District 5. Also
asked if any other Director could have opportunity to review this annexation at
some future time? Woodruff said he didn't see any reason why ·not. Mc!nnis
said he thought Burton's concern should be with IRWD and had no objection if he
attended.
Gordon Jones then spoke and advised that letter is not a request to annex. Letter
is from consultant who is studying all the alternatives. of all potential methods.
Merely trying to get information for study. Didn't see why City of Irvine would
want to attend for that.
(32-a) DISTRICI' 7 -OPA
Burton said since we are short a full body and we canceled the previous meeting
because of a lack of full body, wondered if it wouldn't be more reasonable to
continue one more time until we get a full body.
I
Peggy introduced herself and stated that she agreed that this is an important
action and that all Board members should be available.
Saltarelli said if there is a quorum, should conduct action. Burton argued that
he was all r e ady to attend another meeting but was canceled becaus e one member
couldn't attend and didn't matter regarding a quorum then.
Peggy then offered to give them a little bit more explanation whether they took
action then or not. Jackman stated that they should decide whether to proceed or
not before giving explanations.
Burton the n a s ked Woodruff if motion was made for petitioners and ties and fails,
was concerned that the failure would not give them an opportunity to come back,
right? (don't know what Woodruff answered)
Jackman moved to continue. Sa ltarelli seconded but said it was not beca use all
members were not there. Chairman requested that it be taken up at next regular
meeting of District 7.
-5-
(34)
(9-t)
(32)
Cont.
***
(33)
DISTRICT 7 -Other business:
Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer -Deferred from Consent Calendar
Question was asked why are these reaches being built at this time? Conrad
Hohener explained that these are master planned sewers and were scheduled for
completion in 1975. Are nine months overdue. Said Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer
relieves North Trunk Sewer which is at the present time flowing full. Will tie
into side of Orange Sewer at Rio Vista and thereby relieving it. Further explained
location of the Tustin-Orange and North Trunks and points that they tie in. Said
sewer was to take care of future growth of District 7. Part of it is relieved
without Reaches 15 & 16. Jackman asked again why we were building it at this time.
Hohener answered that with anticipated growth, it has to be relieved at upper
reaches. Asked it if could be postponed 6 months and Conrad said maybe 6 months.
Then asked if it could be postponed for 6 years and he answered no, he didn't
believe so. Jackman then asked if the growth matched the forecast and was answered
yes.
It was then moved to continue this item to the next regular meeting. Motion
seconded. Burton asked if this presents any problem. REL advised that we are
getting very competitive bids and felt if we defer to next meeting, wouldn't
be too detrimental. Told of past bids that we under engineer's estimate. Said
they have been preparing plans and specs according to schedule. Didn't think
March would really be detrimental but beyond that would be. Saltarelli then withdrew
his second to defer item and Jackman withdrew motion also. Said he just wanted
some answers. Moved and seconded to approve plans and specs. Motion carried.
Regarding item #32 again, Peggy McElligott strongly urged members of the Board
to take action at the next regular meeting. Said she was a little concerned
with all procedures and things that have to be filed with LAFC, here and the
voters. The more delay the less chance of it going to happen.
Perez suggested that the staff contact Directors prior to next regular meeting
to get indication of whether all members could be present.
Annexation policy resolution
Saltarelli moved to approve . Motion seconded. Jackman moved to defer to
next meeting as he thought it should be tied in with OPA. Saltarelli then
withdrew his motion to app r ove. (Second did not withdraw.)
Called for the question (o n Saltarelli's motion). Motion failed.
Moved to continue to next r egular meeting. Seconded and carried.
-6-