HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-11-25COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
November 20, 1975
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETHJG
DISTRICTS NOS. lJ 2J 3J 5J 6J 7 & 11
TUESDAY) NOVEMBER 25) 1975, 6:00 PaM.
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY) CALIFORNIA
TELE PH ON ES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
I am calling a special meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts :-Tc~. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 aT1d 11 of Orarige Cow:..ty, Califo:niia., at t~-H::
above hour and date.
The purpose of the meeting is as follows:
A. Consideration cf employee wages and fringe benefits
B. Staff report and further discussion regarding "Section 208"
planning for the Sut~thern California area. (Area-wide planning
pursuant to the provisions of the 1972 Amendments to the federal
Water Pollution Control Act)
Don Winn
Joint Chnirman
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
Special Meeting
November 25, 1975 -6:00 p.m.
Post Office Box 81 2 7
10844 Ell is Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 71 4
540-2910
962-2411
Chairman Winn has called a special meeting of the
Boards Tuesday, November 25th, for the purpose of further
consideration of the Districts' employees' salary and
fringe benefits adjustments and additional discussions
relative to PL 92-500 "208" planning designation for the
South Coast Area.
No. 6 -Employee Wages and Fringe Benefits
Enclosed for the Directors is a confidential staff
report regarding negotiations to date. Two additional
meet-and-confer sessions have been scheduled for November
24th and 25th prior to the special 6:00 p .m., Tuesday
meeting of the Joint Boards.
No. 7 -"208" Planning Designation
Included with the agenda material is a copy of the
staff's November 17th presentation to the State Hearing
Board. The Chairman of the Hearing Board, State Board
member Don Maughan, has advised the hearing record will
be left open for additional recommendations and testimony
until December 1 5t h.
Chairman Winn has indicated that in the event the
Boards are not able to reach a decision Tuesday relative
to "208 " planning designation in the South Coast area, he
will appoint a committee of Directors who will recommend
a course of action at the regular Joint meeting on December
10th.
Fred A. Harper
Gener al Manager
II
-. BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127
of Orange County, California 10844 El I is Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
JOINT BOARDS
SPECIAL MEETING
NOVEMBER 25J 1975 -6:00 PaM.
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll Call
~~,-~
(3) · Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary ~\A.\,?_ ~~
(4) Consideration of motion to reeeive 8:ftd file minute e*eeFpts, if eny
(5) ALL DISTRICTS
Reports of:
@) Joint Chainnan
~ General Manager
{e) General C-otms·e-l
(6) ALL DISTRICTS
(8)
(a)
(b)
(c)
Consideration of motion to convene in executive session '<li re personnel matters (employee wages and fringe benefits) u
Consideration of motion to reconvene in regular session "·.59
Consideration of action on items considered in
executive session
ALL DISTRICTS
Staff report and further discussion regarding "Section 208" planning
for the Southern Califoniia area (Area-wide planning pursuant to the
provisions of the 1972 Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act) See attachment.
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to adjourn CQ·.5 8
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
November 17, 1975
(71.C) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
TO: 208 Planning Designation Hearing Board of the State Water
Resources Control Board
RE: Public Hearing to be Held at 10:00 a.m., November 17, 1975,
in Room L-6, Los Angeles County Health Service Auditorium,
313 North Figueroa, Los Angeles, CA
The governing body of the Orange County Sanitation Districts appreciate
the opportunity to express their views relative to the matter of
208 Planning for the South Coast area. However·, as of this date,
our Boards of Directors have not reached a decision as to an
appropriate area(s) and/or planning agency(s) for designation
for areawide waste treatment management planning. The Directors
have under consideration the following proposals:
(1) That the entire South Coast area be designated
and that the Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG) be designated as the planning
agency
(2) That the entire South Coast area be designated;
however, with a planning agency formed through a
Joint Powers Agreement involving the City of Los
Angeles, the Los Angeles and Orange County Sanitation
Districts, Counties of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside
San Bernardino and possibly Ventura, the Metropolitan
Water District, the Santa Ana Watershed Project
Authority, etc., with each entity accepting the
responsibility of doing the planning within their
expertise.
ioB Planning Designation
Hearing Board
November 17, 1975
Page 2
(3) That the South Coast area be broken into
County planning areas and the designation of
separate 208 planning agencies involving Joint
Powers arrangements in each of the counties to
bring the required disciplines together
(4) That the entire South Coast area be designated
with SCAG as the lead agency, with a stipulation
that the respective· governing bodies of those
agencies responsible for implementation must
• • , '
0 "'v .&..;:-7: • .1."iP 2 'v-' o"' D .L. ~ .,...ll re .J..i a~ t: l' ""'.LlQ'. t. 0 approve tna~ portion -'~ r ~ -0
their activities prior to adoption by the
designated 208 planning agency
(5) A 5th proposal was submitted for our con-
sideration on November 12 from the Santa Ana
Watershed Project Authority. This proposal, which
has not been studied by our elected officials, pro-
poses the Santa Ana River Basin area for areawide
wastewater designation, and designation of an
alliance formed by a Joint Powers Agreement by the
Counties of Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino,
the Cities of Chino, Corona, Beaumont, Fontana,
San Bernardino, Redlands, Ontario, Upland, and
Yucaipa, as well as special districts Orange
208 Planning Designation
Hearing Board
November 17, 1975
Page 2
County Sanitation Districts, Irvine Ranch Water
District, Newport-Irvine Wastewater Management
Agency and the Eastern Municipal Water District.
Our Boards of Directors need additional time to review these
proposals and any others that may be presented at today's hearing.
Therefore, we respectfully request that the hearing record be held
open to December 15_to enable the governing body of the Orange
County Sanitation Districts the opportunity to express their
desires with regard to area designation(s) and the appropriate
planning agency(s) designation.
c£~ir
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
A G E N D A
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNl.A
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-241 l
Re: November 25th -10:30 a.m. Meeting to Discuss Construction
Grants for Improved Treatment at Orange County Sanitation
Districts' Facilities
Enclosed is a status report of the facilities planning efforts
presently authorized under a Step 1 Grant No. C-06-1073 which
will be discussed in further detail at the above-mentioned
meeting. We would like to suggest the following agenda items
for discussion purposes:
10:30 a.m.
10:45 a.m.
11:00 2..T. ..
11:30 a.m.
12:15 p.m.
1:15
2:00 p.rn.
An over-all review of the current and
future construction grant programs at the
federal level
An over-all review of the current and
future construction grant programs at
the State level ·
A disc~ssicn conce~ni~g the status of the
Facilities Plan.and the Environmental Impact
Statement to be presented by Mr. Harvey Hunt
of John Carollo Engineers and Mr. Jerry
Gilbert of Gilbert and Associates
Discussions of alternate methods of imple-
mentation of improved treatment facilities
Luncheon
General Discussion of Items Presented
Adjourn
There are certain questions which have become apparent in recent
months on which members of our Boards of Directors and staff
would like the Environmental Protection Agency's and State's
guidance. These are as follows:
1. Can the Districts commence any engineering design
efforts before completion of the final Environmental
Impact Statement?
2. To what extent can preliminary engineering design be
authorized under a Step 1 grant?
3. Since the Sanitation Districts are in a critic~l
air basin, should the treatment expansion to
accommodate future growth be designed to accom-
modate the Districts' population projections
without the State and Envirorunental Protection
Agency participation or restricted to that as
provided for by the E-0 population growth as
approved by the State?
4. What is the status of .the retention of the
payment of the final 20 percent of grant monies
made conditional upon the implementation and
approval of a revenue program (user charge
system)?
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA .
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
November 19, 1975
NOTICE TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Donald Winn, Joint Chairman
Norma Gibbs, Vice Joint Chairman
Kerm Rima
Michael Callahan
Phillip Cox
Don Mcinnis
John Store
John Garthe
Laurence Schmit
Re: November 25th, 10:30 a.m., Meeting -Newport Marriott
Hotel -Discussion of Construction Grants for Improved
Treatment at Orange County Sanitation Districts'
Fac:iliti~s
TELEPHONES:
AR EA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
As previously an~ounced, the Committee will be meeting with
representatives from EPA and the State Water Resources
Control Board next Tuesday morning at the Newport Marriott
Hotel, Pacific Ballroom, Suite B. We will be reviewing the
status of our Step 1 planning effort and discussing other
possible courses of action which may speed up construction
of facilities to meet State and Federal requirements.
Enclosed is a brief agenda which we have prepared for the
meeting, along with a status report on the Step 1 Facilities
Plan.
Enclosures
d1 !?, ~t-'-'-
Fred A. Harper .
General Manager
,..
A G E N D A
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNl.A
P. 0 . BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORN I A 92708
(714) S-40-2910
(71-4) 962-241 l
Re: November 25th -10:30 a.m. Meeting to Discuss Construction
Grants for Improved Treatment at Orange County Sanitation
Districts' Facilities
Enclosed is a status report of the facilities planning efforts
presently authorized under a Step 1 Grant No. C-06-1073 which
will be discussed in further detail at the above-mentioned
meeting. We would like to suggest the following agenda items
for discussion purposes:
10:30 a.m.
10:45 a.m.
11:00 a.m.
11:30 a.m.
12:15 p.m.
1:15
2:00 p.m.
An over-all review of the current and
future construction grant progra~s at the
federal level
An over-all review of the ·current and
future construction grant programs at
the State level
A discussion concerning the status of the
Facilities Plan .and the Environmental Impact
Statement to be presented by Mr. Harvey Hunt
of John Carollo Engineers and Mr. Jerry
Gilbert of Gilbert and Ass o ciates
Discussions of alternate methods of imple-
mentation of impr9ved treatment facilities
Luncheon
General Discussion of Items Presented
Adjourn
There are certain questions which have become apparent in recent
months on which members of our Boards of Directors and staff
would like the Environmental Protection Agency's and State's
guidance. These are as follows:
·1. Can the Districts commence any engineering design
efforts before completion of the final Env.ironmental
Impact Statement?
2. To what extent can preliminary engineering design · be
·authorized under a Step 1 grant?
·. .
3. Since the Sanitation Districts are in a critical
air basin, should the treatment expansion to
accommodate future growth be designed to accom-
modate the Districts' population projections
without the State and Environmental Protection
Agency participation or restricted to that as
provided for by the E-0 population growth as
approved by the State? · ·
4. What is the status of the retenti o n of the
payment of the final 20 percent of grant monies
made conditional upon the implementation and
approval of a revenue program (user charge
system)?
I
\
/
. . ... ! .~ \ 1GENDA ITEM NO. 5 (B)
I ;
I ,
~ ·ttov~mber 24, 1975
J
Honorabl e Board of Superv isors
Count y of Orange
Santa Ana, CA
SUBJECT: l·Jashington Office Implemen tation Plan
Gentlemen:
On November 18, 1975, your Honorable Board directed the Administrative Office
to develop the most economically and operationa~ly effective method of
establishing a Washington office. This plan has been developed with the
assistance of Richard T. Hanna, member of Congress, retired, alon q the li ne
of his letter probosal to your Honor able Board dated November 8, 1975, and
with the Orange County Transit Distri st which has agreed to jointl y fund t he
Washington office.
Co~t Estimate -Washinqton Office and Staff
Services of Richard T. Hanna
Expenses of Richard T. Hanna
Air fare @ $500 round trip
Lod gi ng, mea l s, incidentals
Legislative Assistant
Receptioni s t/Secretary
Office rent
Telephone
Utilitie s
Miscellan eo us
Office furniture (FY 1975-76)
Annually
$30,000
6,000
9,000
20,000
12,000
6,700
3,600
1,200
1,500
$90,00 0
Jan.-June 1 76
$15,000
3,000
4,500
10 ,000 .
6,000
3,350
l ,800
600
75 0
$45,000
1,000
$46,0 00
. ;f."_
-2-
.Proposed Imnl ementa ti on Schedule
A. Board of OCTD approval of plan December 1, 1975
B. Board of Supervisors approval of plan December 9, 1975
C. Effective date of agreement with Richard T. Hanna January l, 1976
D. Lease of office and employment of Receptionist/
Secretary in Washington, D.C. January 1976
E. Recruitment and employment of Legislative Assistant January 1976
F. Operatio~lWashington office February 1, 1976
I\
Proposed Implementation Plan
It is proposed that Mr. Hanna be retained as an independent contractor
representing both the County and the Orange County Transit District in a
#f fJ...a 4,,.#\11
manner similar to the agreemen~with Ted Craig, the County's Sacramento
lobbyist. An agreement acceptable to Mr. Hanna· and signed by him is enclosed.
Fonowing the precedent of the County's Sacramento office, it is proposed
that the Washington office staff of a Receptionist/Secretary and a
Legislative Assistant be retained by contract rather than being hired as
·county employees. Selection and approval of the Receptionist/Secretary
would be delegated to Mr. Hanna. Nomination of the Legislative Assistant
would be delegated to Mr. Hanna subject to interview and approval by your
Honorable Board and the Board of the Orange County Transit District.
Budgetary cognizance and approval of statements for personal services and
expenses, travel, office rent, telephone charges, purchase of office supplies,
an~ other expenditures of the Washington office would be assigned to the
Budget-Legislation-Grants Division. of this office, in keeping with similar
responsibility for the Sacramento office. The Administrative Office would
··'
'--" report \~ashington office expenditures monthly to the Orange County Transit District.
-3-
Proposed Local Coordination and Staff ~Q!J.
. Local coordination and staff support will be simlar to that which is
provided to the County's Sacramento office. The Budqet-Legislation-Grants
Division of the Administrative Office will coordinate all routine contracts
between the Washington office, the County Legislative Planninn Committee,
County agencies and departments, and the Orange County Transit District.
This will provide efficient, orderly and accountable action on all matters
requiring written follow-up withou-t'restricting the ability of Mr. Hanna to
telephone directly to members of your Honorable Board, or to executive
mana.gement or other key personnel of the County or Transit District \·1hen
more appropriate.
Analysis of cost or procedural impacts of proposed Federal le0islation
received from the Wash·ington office will be coordinated b.v the Administrative
agencies and departments, following the procedures currently in operation
for State legislation.
No increase in the staff of the Administrative Office will be requested for
this additional workload in the remainder of Fiscal Year 1975-76. Present
staff supporting the Sacramento office will be augmented by temporary
assignment of other Administrative Office personnel and Transit District
personnel when required. It is anticipated that one additional full-time
staff person may be required to coordinate activities of the Sacramento and .
Washington offices in FY 1976-77, but not necessarily requ i~t:'J an addition
to the total Administrative Office staff. This workload requirement \vill
·be more accurately evaluated when we have experience with supportin~ a
Washington office.
( -'+-(
CONCWSION:
As requested by your Honorable Board on November ·18, 1975 to develop the
most economical and operationally effective method of establishing a
Washington office it is proposed that the office be jointly funded by the
County and the 0 range County Transit District, using present procedures
of the County's Sacramento office.
RECOMMENDATION: 1. Authorize the transfer of $41,400 of currently frozen
excess funds from Budget Unit 0916 to Budget Unit 0146 -
Legislation, Account 190 -Professional/Specialized
~,;. • -re ... '!h.s
Services, to provide~afle ~ilf of the funds for the
establishment and operation of an Orange County
Washington office from January l, through June 30, 1976.
2. Appropriate $4,600 as unanticipated revenue from the
ufan~_12 County fra11si t lJistrict in reventi':: ai..:count / 13
and in Budget Unit 0146 -Legislation, Account 190 -
Professional/Specialized Services, to provide ten
percent of the funds for the establishment and operation
of an Orange County Washington office from January l
through June 30, 1976.
3. Approve and authorize the Chairman of the Board to sign
the enclosed agreement between the County, OCTD and
Richard T. Hanna for the personal services of r1r. Hanna,
as described in the agreement, as Orange County's
Washington Representative.
,t -
(
( -5-(
4. Authorize Richard T. Hanna to proceed as necessarv
within the terms of the agreement to establish an
operative Washington office by February 1, 1976.
(
\ .
., -""-
......,
. 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
.J >
II.It-
IL WI Z 15 c z :> :> 0
I!! 0 u uU 16 -Ill IL>()
IL I-z
0 z <(
=>a: 17 eo
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
~
31
32
JWA:ks
F 0192·1.2
FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE ADVOCATES SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is entered into on the day of December,
1975, between the County of Qrange, hereinafter referred to as COUNTY,
and Richard T. Hanna, hereinafter referred to as MR. HANNA.
and regulation
WHEREAS, the impact of federal legislation/on local government
is constantly on the increase, necessitating a closer awareness and
greater participation in the adoption of such legislation and regulation,
and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors desires to contract for the ser-
vices of a per~on who is by training and experience competent to act as
a legislative advocate for COUNTY, and
WHEREAS, MR. HANNA possesses the educationj training, and experi-
ence necessary to provide the desired services,
IT IS HEREBY ~U'l'UALLY AGREES AS .t<"'OLLOWS:
1. The term of this agreement shall commence on January 1, 1976,
and continue until such time as it is terminated,.by either party upon
~he giving of a thirty-day notice in writing.
2. MR. HANNA's services as the County's Legislative Advocate shall:
be rendered under the direction and supervision of the Orange County
Board of Supervisors except as hereinafter set forth in Paragraph 6.
3. MR. HANNA's services shall be as an independent contractor
and he shall not be an employee of COUNTY.
4. MR. HANNA's services as a legislative advocate shall be per-
formed exclusively for COUNTY and he shall not act in the same or similar
capacity for any other public agency except as agreed upon between MR.
HANNA and COUNTY as hereinafter set forth.
5. In consideration of MR. HANNA's rendering the follo~ing ser7
vices to COUNTY and to other Orange County local public entities, as
hereinafter provided, COUNTY shall pay to MR. HANNA the sum of $2500 per
calendar month, payable on or before the 10th day of each month,
1.
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
..J > .., ...
IL on Z 1 <i . 0 z ::> ~ 11 :::>"
iol 0 v I
uU 16 ii:>~
Ii. ... z
oz< =>a: 17 30
18
19
20
21
22
23
·24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
f 0192.1.2
commencing January 1, 1976, and continuing until this Agreement is
terminated in the manner set forth above.
(a) Set up an operative office in Washington, D. c~,employing
one Secretary and one Legislative Assistant, both of whom shall render
full time service.
(b) Advocate the interests of COUNTY in federal legislation.
(c) Provide Congressional delegates and their staffs with
details of cost and procedural impact of proposed federal legislation
on County.
(d) Provide access for local governmental and private experts to
assist in drafting and t~stifying on proposed federal legislation which
would impact COUNTY.
(e) Determine available programs for grants and funds for which
COUNTY appears to be qualified.
(f) Assist in the structuring of grant applications and cooperate
with whatever agency of COUNTY is determined to be the appropriate
agency to initiate said application.
(g) Monitor, assist and expedite all such grant applications.
(h) Provide any service related to legislative or agency regul-
lation which would affect funding programs and any and all ancillary
activities associated therewith.
(i) When requested to do so by COUNTY or other local public
i
entity authorized to participate in this Agreement, provide copies of all'
I
proposed federal legislation and regulation impacting all COUNTY or such 1
I
other local public entities with recommendations on positions to be taken:
by COUNTY or such other local public entities.
(6) COUNTY, with MR. HANNA's approval, may enter ·into agreements
with other Orange County local public entities to permit such public
entities to utilize the services of MR. HANNA for some or all of those
services MR. HANNA is required to provide COUNTY. Such agreements may
provide that such public entities shall be entitled to a percentage of
MR. HANNA's services provided, however, that MR. HANNA shall be the
2. ..
..._,.: 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
.J >
1&11-
IL" Z 15 0 z :> :> 0 w 0 IJ uU 16 k: > ~
I&. I-z
0 z"' =>a: 17 80
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
F om.1.2
sole judge of the proper distribution of his services between on or
more participating public entities. As to those public entities
authorized to participate in MR. HANNA's services, MR. HANNA shall
act under the direction and supervision of the governing body of such
local public entity or person designated by such governing body.
7. As further consideration for MR. HANNA's services, he shall
be reimbursed for actual and n~cessary expenditures incident to the
performance of his services including lodging, travel and meals, includ-
ing meals for other persons which MR. HANNA feels are necessarily
incident to the services. Reimbursement for travel by private conveyance
shall be at the current mileage reimbursements rate for COUNTY employees.I
8. As hereinbefore agreed upo~ reimbursement of expenditures,
shall be pa·id monthly, on claims in writing substantiated by such
detailed itemization and receipts as requested by the County Auditor-
Controller and approved by the.county Administrative Officer.
I ' ...
AGENDA ITEM NO I 5 "(B)
t!ovember 24, 1975
Honorable Board of Supervisors
County of Orange
Santa Ana, CA
SUBJECT: Washington Office Implementation Plan
Gentlemen:
0MFT
~
\
On November 18, 1975, your Honorabie Board directed the Administrative Office
to develop the most economically and operational_ly effective method of
establishing a Washington office. This plan has been developed with the
-assistance of Richard T. Hanna, member of Congress, retired, alonq the line
of his letter probosal to your Honorable Board dated November 8, 1975, and
with the Orange County Transit Distrist which has agreed to jointly fund the
Washington office.
Co~t Estimate -Washinqton Office and Staff
Services of Richard T. Hanna
Expenses of Richard T. Hanna
Air fare @ $500 round trip
Lodging, meals, incidentals
Legislative Assistant
Receptionist/Secreta~y
Office rent
Telephone
Utilities
Miscellaneous
Office furniture (FY 1975-76)
Annually
$30,000
6,000
9,000
20,000
12,000
6,700
3,600
1,200
1,500
$90,000
Jan.-June '76
$15,000
3,000
4,500
10,000
6,000
3,350
1,800
600
750
$45,000
1,000
$46,000
-2-
Proposed Imnlementation Schedule
A. Board of OCTD approval of plan
B. Board of Supervisors approval of plan
C. Effective date of agreement with Richard T. Hanna
D. Lease of office and employment of Receptionist/
Secretary in Washington, O.C.
December 1, 1975
December 9, 1975
January 1, 1976
January 1976
E. Recruitment and employment of Legislative Assistant January 1976
F. Operatio;tWashington office February 1, 1976
I\.
Proposed Implementation Plan
It is proposed that Mr. Hanna be retained as an independent contractor
representing both the County and the Orange County Transit District in a
#f fJ..a 4,.. ., 11
manner similar to th~ agreemen~with Ted Craig, the County's Sacramento
lobbyist~ An agreement acceptable to Mr. Hanna and signed by him is enclosed.
Follm·ling the precedent of the County 1 s Sacramento office, it is proposed
that the Washington office staff of a Receptionist/Secretary and a
· Legislative Assistant be retained by contract rather than being hired as
County employees. Selection and approval of the Receptionist/Secretary
would be delegated to Mr. Hanna. Nomination of the Legislative Assistant
would be delegated to Mr. Hanna subject to interview and approval by your
Honorable Board and the Board of the Orange County Transit District.
Budgetary cognizance and approval of statements for personal services and
expenses, travel, office rent, telephone charges, purchase of office supplies,
an~ other expenditures of the Washington office would be assigned to the
Budget-Legislation-Grants Division. of this office, in keeping with similar
responsibility for the Sacramento office. The Administrative Office would
report Washington office expenditures monthly to the Orange County Tra.nsit Distric~
-3-
.Proposed local Coordination and Staff Suppgrt
Local coordination and staff support will be simlar to that which is
provided to the County's Sacramento office. The Budqet-leqislation-Grants
Division of the Administrative Office will coordinate all routine contracts
between the Washinqton office, the County Legislative Plannin9 Committee,
County agencies and departments, and the Orange County Transit District.
This will provide efficient, orderly and accountable action on all matters
requiring written follow-up withou-t'restricting the ability of Mr. Hanna to
telephone directly to members of your Honorable Board, or to executive
management or other key personnel of the County or Transit District \·1hen
more appropriate.
Anal.Ysis of cost or procedural impacts of proposed Federal le~islation
received from the Washington office will be cootdinated by the Administrative
Office, but y1i1l ~e p~rforrner:i by affect~d C0u~t~1 ~::d Tr?.risit Di stric:t
agenc·ie-s and departments, following the procedures currently in operation
for State legislation.
No increase in the staff of the Administrative Office will be requested for
this additional workload in the remainder of Fiscal Year 1975-76. Present
staff supporting the Sacramento office will be augmented by temporary
assignment of other Administrative Office personnel and Transit District
personnel when required. It is anticipated that one additional full-time
staff person may be required to coordinate activities of the Sacramento and .
Washington offices in FY 1976-77, but not necessarily requi~~ an addition
to the total Administrative Office staff. This workload requirement \-Jill
be more accurately evaluated when we have experience with supporting a
Washington office.
( -'t-(
CONCWSION:
As requested by your Honorable Board on November 18, 1975 to develop the
most economical and operationally effective method of establishing a
Washington office it is proposed that the office be jointly funded by the
County and the 0 range County Transit District, using present procedures
of the County's Sacramento office.
RECOMMENDATION: l. Authorize the transfer of $41,400 of currently frozen
excess funds from Budget Unit 0916 to Budget Unit 0146 -
Legislation, Account 190 -Professional/Specialized
~,;,._ -Tt,,.'!h'
Services, to provide~&l'te ~alf of the funds for the
establishment and operation of an Orange County
Washington office from January 1, through June 30, 1976.
2. Appropriate $4,600 as unanticipated revenue from the
lh-an~Je County Tra11si t Llistr1ct in revenu~ dccoun:.: 71J
and in Budget Unit 0146 -Legislation, Account 190 -
Professional/Specialized Services, to provide ten
percent of the funds for the establishment and operation
of an Orange County v!ashi ngtcn office from January 1
through ~une 30, 1976.
3. Approve and authorize the Chairman of the Board to sign
the enclosed agreement between the County, OCTD and
Richard T. Hanna for the personal services of r1r. Hanna,
as described in the agreement, as Orange County's
Washington Re~resentative.
(
( -5-(
4. Authorize Richard T. Hanna to proceed as necessary
within the terms of the agreement to establish an
operative Washington office by February 1, 1976.
(
\ .
. , -
. 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
..J >
1111-
IL l'I Z 15 0 z :> :> 0
Ill 0 (,;
uV 16 ii:>~
IL I-z
oz< =>a: 17 eo
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
~
31
32
JWA:ks
f 0192-1.2
FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE ADVOCATES SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is entered into on the day of December,
1975, between the County of Orange, hereinafter referred to as COUNTY,
and Richard T. Hanna, hereinafter referred to as MR. HANNA.
and regulation
WHEREAS, the impact of federal legislation/on local government
is constantly on the increase, necessitating a closer awareness and
greater participation in the adoption of such legislation and regulation,
and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors desires to contract for the ser-
vices of a person who is by training and experience competent to act as
a legislative advocate for COUNTY, and
WHEREAS, MR. HANNA possesses the e~ucation; training, and experi-
ence necessary to provide the desired services,
IT IS HEREBY ~UTUALLY AGREES AS FOLLOWS:
1. The term of this agreement shall commence on January 1, 1976,
and continue until such time as it is terminated,.by either party upon
·the giving of a thirty-day notice in writing.
2. MR. HANNA's services as the County's Legislative Advocate shall:
be rendered under the direction and supervision of the Orange County
Board of Supervisors ex~ept as hereinafter set forth in Paragraph 6.
3. MR. HANNA's services shall be as an independent contractor
and he shall not be an employee of COUNTY.
4. MR. HANNA's services as a legislative advocate shall be per-
formed exclusively for COUNTY and he shall not act in the same or similar
capacity for any other public agency except as agreed upon between MR.
HANNA and COUNTY as hereinafter set forth •.
5. In consideration of MR. HANNA's rendering the following ser""."'
vices to COUNTY and to other Orange County local public entities, as
hereinafter provided, COUNTY shall pay to MR. HANNA the sum of $2500 per
calendar month, payable on or before the 10th day of each month,
1.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
..J > w ...
IL~ Z 15 0 -:::> :::>" .. 3 v
16 ~ w IL>~
IL I-Z ozc
:>a: 17 80
.18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
f 0192-1.2
c9nunencing January 1, 1976, and continuing until this Agreement is
terminated in the manner set forth above.
(a) Set up an operative office in Washington, D. c~,employing
one Secretary and one Legislative Assistant, both of whom shall render
full time service.
(b) Advocate the interests of COUNTY in federal legislation.
(c) Provide Congressional delegates and their staffs ,with
details of cost and procedural impact of proposed federal legislation
on County.
(d) Provide access for local governmental and private experts to
assist in drafting and t~stifying on proposed federal legislation which
would impact COUNTY.
(e) Deter~ine available programs for grants and funds for which
COUNTY appears to be qualified.
(f) Assist in the structuring of grant applications and cooperate
with whatever agency of COUNTY is determined to be the appropriate
agency to initiate said application.
(g) Monitor, assist and expedite all such grant applications •
(h) Provide any service related to legislative or agency regul-
lation which would affect funding programs and any and all ancillary
activities associated therewith.
(i) When requested to do so by COUNTY or other local public
I
entity authorized to participate in this Agreement, provide copies of a11:
I proposed federal legislation and regulation impacting all COUNTY or such ·
I
other local public entities with recommendations on positions to be taken:
by COUNTY or such other local public entities.
(6) COUNTY, with MR. HANNA's approval, may enter ·into agreements
with other Orange County local public entities to permit such public
entities to utilize the services of MR. HANNA for some or all of those
services MR. HANNA is required to provide COUNTY. Such agreements may
provide that such public entities shall be entitled to a percentage of
MR. HANNA' s services provided, -however, that MR. HANNA shall be the
2.
"''
2.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
~>
1111-
IL fl Z 15 0 z ::>
:l 0 ~I e ~
16 ~ Ill
IL> Cl
I&. ... z
oz< =>11: 17 80
18
19
20
21
22
23
·24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
sole judge of the proper distribution of his services between on or
more participating public entities. As to those public entities
authorized to participate in MR. HANNA's services, MR. HANNA shall
act under the direction and supervision of the governing body of such
local public entity or person designated by such governing body.
7. As further consideration for MR. HANNA's services, he shall
be reimbursed for actual and necessary expenditures incident to the
performance of his services including lodging, travel and meals, includ-
ing meals for other persons which MR. HANNA feels are necessarily
incident to the services. Reimbursement for travel by private conveyance
shall be at the current mileage reimbursements rate for COUNTY employees.I
8. As hereinbefore agreed upo~ reimbursement of expenditures,
shall be paid monthly, on. claims in writing substantiated by such
detailed itemization and receipts as requ~sted by the County Auditor-
Controller and approved by the County Administrative Officer.
r 11
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 (s)
~ovember 24, 1975
Honorable Board of Supervisors
County of Orange
Santa Ana, CA
SUBJECT: Washington Office Implementation Plan
Gentlemen:
On November 18, 1975, your Honorable Board directed the Administrative Office
to develop the most economically and operationa~ly effective method of
establishing a Washington office. This plan has been developed with the
.
assistance of Richard T. Hanna, member of Congress, retired, alonq the line
of his letter pro~osal to your Honorable Board dated November 8, 1975, and
with the Orange County Transit Distrist which has agreed to jointly fund the
Washington office.
Co~t Estimate -Washinqton Office and Staff
Services of Richard T. Hanna
Expenses of Richard T. Hanna
Air fare @ $500 round trip
Lodging, meals, incidentals
Legislative Assistant
Receptionist/Secretary
Office rent
Telephone
Utilities
Miscellaneous
Office furniture (FY 1975-76)
Annually
$30,090
6,000
9,000
20,000
12,000
6,700
3,600
1, 200
1,500
$90,000
Jan.-June '76
$15,000
3,000
4,500
10 ,000
6,000
3,350
1,800
600
750
"$45,0oo
1,000
$46,000
·~
-2-
Proposed Imnlementation Schedule
A. Board of OCTD approval of plan December 1, 1975
B. Board of Supervisors approval of plan December 9, 1975
C. Effective date of agreement with Richard T.· Hanna Junuary 1, 1976
D. Lease of office and employment of Receptionist/
Secretary in Washington, D.C.· January 1976
E. Recruitment and employment of Legislative Assistant January 1976
F. Operatio~lWashington office February l, 1976
I\.
Proposed Implementation Plan
It is proposed that Mr. Hanna be retained as an independent contractor
representing both the County and the Orange County Transit District in a
#f tha C.,.,..,,1y
manner similar to the agreemen~with Ted Craig, the County 1 s Sacramento
lobbyist. An agreement acceptable to Mr. Hanna and signed by him is enclosed.
Following the precedent of the County=s Sacramento office·, it is proposed
that the Washington office staff of a Receptionist/Secretary and a
Legislative Assistant be retained by contract rather than being hired as
County employees. Selection and approval of the Receptionist/Secretary
would be delegated to Mr. Hanna. Nomination of the Legislative Assistant
would be delegated to Mr. Hanna subject to interview and approval by your
Honorable Board and the Board of the Orange County Transit District.
Budgetary cognizance and approval of statements for personal services and
expenses, travel, office rent, telephone charges, purchase of office supplies,
and other expenditures of the Washington office would be assigned to the
Budget-Legislation-Grants Division. of this office~ in keeping with similar
responsibility for t~e Sacramento office. The Administrative Offic·~ would
report Washington office expenditures monthly to the Orange County Tra.nsit District~
-3-
Proposed Local Coordination and Staff ~Qrt
Local coordination and staff support will be simlar to that which is
provided to the County's Sacramento office. The l3udqet-Leqislation-Grants
Division of the Administrative Office will coordinate all routine contracts
between the Hashington office, the County Legislative Planning Committee,
County agencies and departments, and the Orange County Transit District.
This will provide efficient, orderly and accountable action on ~11 matters
requiring written follow-up withou4t'restricting the ability of Mr. Hanna to
telephone directly to members of your Honorable Board, or to executive
management or other key personnel of the County or Transit District when
more appropriate.
Analysis of cost or procedural impacts of proposed Federal legislation
received.from the Washington office will be coordinated ~Y the Administrative
0 ff i c e , but •,·ti 11 be per fo ~rn e ':! by a ff er: t e d C 0 t' n t y 3.:: d Tr=.!! s i t Di ::: tr i ct
agencies and departments, following the procedures currently in operation
for State l egi slat ion.
No increase in the staff of the Administrative Office will be requested for
this additional workload in the remainder of Fiscal Year 1975-76. Present
staff supporting the Sacramento office will be augmented by temporary
assignment of other Administrative Office personnel and Transit District
personnel when required. It is anticipated that one additional full-time
staff person may be required to coordinate activities of the Sacramento and .
Washington offices in FY 1976-77, but not necessarily requi~~an addition
to the total Administrative Office staff. This workload requirement \-Jill
be more accurately evaluated when we have experience with supporting a
Washington office.
( -'t-(
CONCWSION:
As requested by your Honorable Board on November 18, 1975 to develop the
most ·economical and operationally effective method of establishing a
Washington office it is proposed that the office be jointly funded by the
County and the 0 range County Transit District, using present procedures
of the County's Sacramento office.
RECOMMENDATiml: 1. Authorize the .transfer of $41,400 of curre~tly frozen
excess funds from Budget Unit 0916 to Budget Unit 0146 -
Legislation, Account 190 -Professional/Specialized
,. ,;. «---te"' 'Tiu
Services, to provide~&Re ~ilf of the funds for the
establishment and operation of an Orange County
Washington office from January l, through June 30, 1976.
2. Appropriate $4,600 as unanticipated revenue from the
Or·an~J~ County ·rrM!Si t uistrict in revenw:! account /lJ
and in Budget Unit 0146 -Legislation, Account 190 -
Professional/Specialized Services, to provide ten
percent of the funds for the establishment and operation
of an Orange County V!ashington office from January 1
through June 30, 1976.
3. Approve and authorize the Chairman of the Board to sign
the enclosed agreement bet\'/een the County, OCTD and
Richard T. Hanna for the persona 1 services of t1r. Hanna,
as described in the agreement, as Orange County's
Washington Representative.
(
( -5-(.
4. Authorize Richard T .. Hanna ·to· proceed as necessary
within the terms of· the agreement to establish an
operative Washington office by February 1, 1976.
(
~
. 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
-'>-
111 ...
II.~ z 15
0 :> g
we~
16 ~ Ill
1&.>-ci
II. ... z
oz< =>a: 17 eo
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30 .....,,
31
32
JWA:ks
F 01'2-l.2
}ftJP!
/}-!JJjrJ /-
FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE ADVOCATES SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is entered into on the day of December,
1975, between the County of Orange, hereinafter referred to as COUNTY,
and Richard T. Hanna, hereinafter referred to as MR. HANNA.
and regulation
WHEREAS, the impact of.federal legislation/on local.government
is constantly on the increase, necessitating a closer awareness and
greater participation in the adoption of such legislation and regulation,
and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors desires to contract for the ser-
vices of a person who is by training and experience competent to act as
a legislative ~dvocate for COUNTY, and
WHEREAS, MR. HAJ.~NA possesses the education; training, and experi-
ence necessary to provide the desired services,
IT IS HEREBY ~UTUALLY AGREES AS FOLLOWS:
1. The term of this agreement shall commence on January 1, 1976,
and continue until such time as it is terrninated,by either party upon
the giving of a thirty-day notice in writing.
2. MR. HANNA's services as the County's Legislative Advocate shall:
be rendered under the direction and supervision of the Orange County
Board of Supervisors except as hereinafter set forth in Paragraph 6.
3. MR. HANNA's services shall be as an independent contractor
and he shall not be an employee of COUNTY.
4. MR. HANNA~s services as a legislative advocate shall be per-
formed exclusively for COUNTY and he shall not act in the same or similar
capacity for any other public agency except as agreed upon between MR.
HANNA and COUNTY as hereinafter set forth.
5. In consideration of MR. HANNA's rendering the following ser~
vices to COUNTY and to other Orange County local public entities, as
hereinafter provided, COUNTY shall pay to MR. HANNA the sum of $2500 per
calendar month, payable on or before the 10th day of each month,
1.
·-r
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
~>
II.It-
IL~ 2 15 11 0 -::> ::>,. ... 0 ~ UV
16 ~ Ill
IL> I)
IL I-2
oz< =>a: 17 ~o
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
f 01'2° l.2
commencing January 1, 1976, and continuing until this Agreement is
terminated in the manner set forth above.
(a) Set up an operative office in Washington, D. c~,employing
one Secretary and one Legislative Assistant. both of whom shall render
full time service.
(b) Advocate the interests of COUNTY in federal legislation.
(c) Provide Congressional delegates and their staffs with
details of cost and procedural impact of proposed federal legislation
on County.
(d) Provide access for local governmental and private experts to
assist in drafting and t~stifying on proposed federal legislation which
would impact COUN.TY.
(e) Determine available programs for grants and funds for which
COUNTY appears to be qualified.
(f) Assist in the structuring of grant applications and cooperate
with whatever agency of COUNTY is determined to be the appropriate
agency to initiate said application.
(g) Monitor, assist and expedite all such grant applications.
(h) Provide any service related to legislative or agency regul-
lation which would affect funding programs and any and all ancillary
activities associated therewith.
(i) When requested to do so by COUNTY or other local public
!
entity authorized to participate in this Agreement, provide copies of all~
I proposed federal legislation and regulation impacting all COUNTY or such ·
i
other local public entities with recommendations on positions to be taken:.
by COUNTY or such other local public entities.
(6) COUNTY, with MR. HANNA's approval, may enter ·into agreements
with other Orange County local public entities to permit such public
entities to utilize the services of MR. HANNA for some or all cf those
services MR. HANNA is required to provide COUNTY. Such agreem(nts may
provide that such public entities shall be entitled to a percentage of
MR. HANNA's services provided, however, that MR. HANNA shall be the
2.
""-"' ' sole judge of the proper distribution of his services between on or .
2 more participating public entities •. As to those public entities
3 authorized to participate in MR. HANNA's services, MR. HANNA shall
4 act under the direction and supervision of the governing body of such
5 local public entity or person ~esignated by such governing body.
6 7. As further consideration for MR. HANNA's services, he shall
7 be reimbursed for actual and necessary expenditures incident to the
8 performance of his services including lodging, travel and meals, includ-
9 ing meals for other persons which MR. HANNA feels are necessarily
10
11
incident to the services. Reimbursement for travel by private conveyance
I
shall be at the current mileage reimbursements rate for COUNTY employees.!
12 8. As hereinbefore agreed upo~ reimbursement of expenditures,
13 shall be paid monthly, on. claims in writing substantiated by such
14 detailed itemization and receipts as requested by the County Auditor-
..I>
Ill~
IL fl Z 15 0 z ::> ::> 0
Ill 0 ~
IJ u 16 ii:>~ IL~ z
OZ-c =>a: 17 ~o
Controller and approved by the County Administrative Officer.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30 __...
31
32
f 0192· l.2
• It
MEET I NG DATE November 25, 1975 TIME 6·00 p ID DISTRICTS 1,2 ,3 ,5 ,6,7 & 11
DISTRICT 1
RIMA ••..•• _&:.___ ----
1 -) I I EDR ICH •••.• BATTIN • • • • ------~VANS) ••.••.•• 61\RTllE-•••• _./_ ----
(SHARP) •••••••• SALTARELLI · _:!_ ----
DISTRICT 2
LYONS ········CALLAHAN···__.!___ ----
EWING .. • •• • •• CHAPUT •.••• _./ ____ _
DIEDRICH) •• •• .CLARK •••••• _./ ____ _
GARTf:iE) •.•.••. EVANS •...•• _v ____ _
THOM) ••••••••. KAYWOOD •••• ~ __ __
FOX) ••••.••..• MAC KAIN .•• _./ ____ _
PERRY. • • • • • v
!SVALSTAD) • • • •• SCOTT ••••• • ./ == ==
PEREZ) ••••••• ::lAC.~ti\~N •••• ~ ___ _
DUNN~) ........ WINN ...... • v
WARD) ••••••.•• WOOD •••• r. -1 · -./-----) 'oo ---GRAHAM ••••••• YOUNG •• J ... _V ____ _
DISTRICT 3
(HOMRIGHAUSEN). COX········ _./_ ----
AMO.···· ••• ~ ___ _
(COLL I NS)· • • • • · BYRNE. • • • • • __:!___ ___ _
CULVER···.· _:!.__ ___ _ GRIFFIN).·····~···· _v'_ ----
GARTHE). ······EVANS······ __.!____ ___ _
MAC K~IN)' 1:: .. ;~ FOX······.· _.; ____ _
SONJU • • • ¥(· FRANKIEWICH ~ ___ _
NEVIl-· ·······GRAHAM •••.. _L_ ___ _
THOM).·····.·. KAYWOOD •.•• ~ ___ _
BLACKMAN) ••••• MC KNEW.... ./
DIEDRJCH) ••••• SCHMIT .•••• _.:!..._ ___ _
GI BBS) •••••••• SH I PLEY. · • ./
STANTON) •••••• SVALSTAD ••• -..;-----
WOOD) ••••••••• WARD.-:-••.•• -I -----
ARB I SO) ••••••• WEISHAUPT. tAJ == ==
DISTRICT 5
~RYCKOFF ). • • • • • MC INNIS· · •
. DIEDRICH).···· RILEY·····
J ------_L ___ _
ROGERS • • • • ----d-----
DISTRICT 6
(Mc INN Is) ••••• STORE .••.•• _J _ ----
(DIEDRICH) ••••• BATTIN •.••. _:!._ ___ _
RIMA ••••••• ---1JL_ ___ _
DISTRICT 7 J
~ EV ANS) . • • • . . . GA-R-i'l1F •.••• __ __ __
'THO NY) • • • • · BURTON • • • · • _/ ___ --brt EDR I CH)···· CLARK • • • • • _L_ ___ _
(Mc INN Is) •••• DOSTAt ••••• _:i__ ----
GLOCKNER · • • _:{__ ___ _
( ) • · • • • • JACKMAN • · • • ~ ___ _
(SHARP) • · • • • • • SALTARELLI · ___!.___ ___ _
DISTRICT 11
(DIEDRICH) •••• SCHMIT ••••• _/ ____ _
(GIBBS) •.••••• DUKE ••••••• + ___ _
(w I EDER) •••••• G !BBS •••• • • _____ _
DISTRICT 8
MITCHELL··· __ ----
(JOHNSoNi • · • • • HOLM • • · • • • • ____ --
(DIEDRICH)···· RILEY •.•.•• _____ _
5/29/75
JOINT BOARDS
AMO · · · · · · · · ___ .
(DIEDRICr) ••.•• BATTIN • • • • • ____ _ ~ANTHONY ••••.• BURTON····· __ _
COLLI~S •••••• BYRNE······· __ --
LYONS ••••.••• CALLAHAN··· __ _
EWING •••••••. CHAPUT······ __ _
(DI EDR !CH) •••• • CLARK······· ___ _
(HOMRIGHAUSEN) ·COX········· ___ _
CULVER ······ ___ _
GRIFFIN) ••••• ·DAVIS······· ___ _
MC INN Is). •••. DOSTAL· • • · • • __
GIBBS) •••••••• DUKE.·······
GARTHE) ..•••• ·EVANS·· • • • • • ----
MAC K1IN) .•.•• FOX ••••••••• ----
SONJU •••••••• FRANKIEWICH.== ==
EVANS ~ ....... GARTHE ...... ___ _
WIEDERJ •••••.• GIBBS ••••••• ___ _
GLOCKNER ••••
NEVIL)j •.••••• GRAHAM,·····====
••••••• JACKMAN •••••
THOM) •••.•••.• KAYWOOD ••••• ====
FOX)."\··· •••. MAC KAIN ••••
RYCOFFJ.< ••••• MC INNIS •••• ====
BLACKMANJ .••.• MC KNEW ••••• ----PERRY ••.•...
(DIEDRICH).··· ·RILEY.······====
RIMA •••••.•• ___ _
ROGERS •••••. ___ _
SHARP) .••••••• SALTARELLI.. ___ _
DIEDRICH) .•••. SCHMIT •••••. ___ _
SVALSTAD) ••••. SCOTT ••••••• __ --
GIBBS) •••. • • •. SH I PLEY • • • • • ___ _
MC INN Is)·· · ··STORE·· · • • • • ___ _
STANTON)· · • • · • SVALSTAD· • • • ___ _
PEREZ)· • • • • • • • • • · • · • ___ _
WOOD)· • • · · • • · ·WARD· • • • · • • • ___ _
ARBISO) ••• ··.·WEISHAUPT.·· ___ _
DUNN~)· • · • • • • ·WINN. • • • • • • • ___ _
WARD) ••••• • •.• WOOD. • •• • • • • ___ _
GRAHAM)· • • • • • · YOUNG. · • · • • • ___ _
OTHERS
' HARPER
SYLVESTER
LEWIS
CLARKE
TAYLOR
BROWN
WOODRUFF
EWING
HOHENER
HOWARD
HUNT
KEITH
KENNEY
LYNCH
MADDOX
MARTINSON
PIERSALL
STEVEN S
v
-v'-
-il_
-r
-r
MEET I NG DATE November 25, 1975 T I ME 6 : 00 p. m. DISTRICTS 1.2,3.5,6, 7 & 11
DISTRICT 1
RIMA •••••• ~ ----
' ·IEDRICH) ••• ··BATTIN.··· ~ ---~VANS).'YM~·. 6ARTHf! •••• _JC:_ ---
lSHARP) •••••••• SALTARELLI·~ ----
DISTRICT 2
LYONS · • · • • • • ·CALLAHAN· • • ~ ----EWING .••••••• CHAPUT ••••• ~ ___ _
DIEDRICH) ••••• CLARK •••••• ~ ___ _
GARTtiE) ..••••• EVANS •••••• ~ ___ _
THO~) ••.•••••• KAYWOOD .••• ~ ___ _
FOX) •••.• ••• •• MAC KAIN •• ·~ ___ _
PERRY •••••• __JL. ___ _
!SVALSTAD) • •••• SCOTT...... ~ ___ _
PEREZ) •••••••• ::fAOCN\AN. • • • Q.,., ___ _
DUNNE).······ .WINN •••• ••• ~
WARD) ••••••••• WOOD. • • • • • • v-
GRAHAM) ••••••• YOUNG •••••• ~========
DISTRICT 3
(HOMRIGHAUSEN).cox •••••••• ~ ----
AMO·.· ••••• ~ ___ _
(COLL I NS) •••••• BYRNE· •• t •• ~ ----
CULVER· •••• ~ ___ _
GR I FF IN)· • • • • • lM\' Is. · · · · · ____k::::_ ___ _
GARTHE)· • • • • • • EVANS······ ~ ___ _
MAC K~IN) ..... Fox ........ __k::::_ ----
SOPMU -~FRANl<IEHICH ~ ___ _
NEVIL-• ·······GRAHAM •• • •• ~ ___ _
THOM) .. ••• .. •• KAYWOOD.... 0-___ _
BLACKMAN).···· MC KNEW.... v-___ _
DIEDRJCH) ••••• SCHMIT ••••• ~ ___ _
GIBBS) •••••••• SHIPLEY.... ~ ___ _
STANTON) •••••• SVALSTAD... V' ___ _
wooD} ••••••••• ~ ••••••• y'"""
ARBISO) ••••••• WEISHAUPT. a..,, ==== ====
DISTRICT 5
(RYCKOFF). ·····MC INNIS··· ~ __ --
(DIEDRICH).···· RILEY····· ~ __ --
ROGERS • • • • ~ ___ _
DISTRICT 6
(MC INN Is) ••••• STORE •••••• ~ ___ _
(DIEDRICH) ••••• BATTIN ••••• v--___ _
R I MA • • • . • • • 0...., __ __
DISTRICT 7
{EVANS) · • · • • • • QA~TME • · · • • ~ ----
( THONY) • • • • • BURTON· • • • • ~ ----
(1'1 EDR I CH)···· CLARK • • • • • ~ ----
(MC INNIS)···· B8STAL • • • • • ~ ----
GLOCKNER···~ __ --
( ) • • • • • • JACKMAN • • • • ~ __ --
(SHARP)· -~~SALTARELLI·~ ___ _
DISTRICT 11
(DIEDRJCH) •••• SCHMIT.···· V __ --
(GIBBS) ••••••• DUKE ••• •••• ~ ___ _
(WIEDER) ...... GIBBS ...... _iL ___ _
DI TRICT 8
MIT
(Jo I oN~ •••••
(DIEDR • • RILEY······ ____ --
5/29/75
JOINT BOARDS
AMO • • · • • • • • ___ .
DIEDRICr) ••••• BATTIN • • • • • ___ _
ANTHONY •••••• BURTON • • • • • __ --
COLL I~S •••••• BYRNE······· ___ _
LYONS •••••••• CALLAHAN • • • ___ _
EWING •••••••• CHAPUT···· .. ___ _
DIEDRICH) ••••• CLARK· • • • • • • ___ _
HOMR I GHAUSEN). COX···· • • • • • __ · __
CULVER······ ___ _
GRIFFIN) ••••• -DAVIS······· ___ _
MC INNIS) ••••• DOSTAL······--__
GIBBS) •••••••• DUKE.······· ___ _
GARTHE) ••••••• EVANS·······
MAC KJIN) ••••• FOX ••••••••• ==.== ====
SONJU •••••••• FRANKIEWICH. ___ _
EVANS ••••••. GARTHE ••••••
WIEDERJ ••••••• GIBBS ••••••• ==.== ====
GLOCKNER ••••
NEVIL)\···· ••. GRAHAM •••••• ===:=====
J ••••••• JACKMAN •••••
THO~) ••••••••• KAYWOOD ••••• ==.== ====
FOX) •• \ ••••••. MAC KAIN ••••
RYCOFFJ.~ ••••• MC INNIS •••• ==:=====
BLACKMANJ •••.• MC KNEW ••••• ----PERRY •••••••
(DIEDRICH). ····RILEY·······======
RIMA •••••••• ----
ROGERS •••••• ----
SHARP). ••••••• SALTARELLI.. __ --
DIEDRICH). •••• SCHMIT •••••• __ --
SVALSTAD). •••• SCOTT ••••••• ----
GI BBS) •••••••• SHIPLEY····· __ --
MC INN Is)····· STORE·· .. ••• __ --
STANTON)······ SVALSTAD· • • • __ --
PEREZ)· • • • • • • • • • • • • • ___ _
wooD) ••••••••• WARD· ••••••• ___ _
ARB I So) ••••••• WEISHAUPT··· ___ _
DUNNE)· • • • • • • ·WINN· • • • • • • • ___ _
WARD) ••••••.•• wooD •••••••• ___ _
GRAHAM) ••••••• YOUNG······· ___ _
OTHERS
HARPER
SYLVESTER
LEWIS
CLARKE
TAYLOR
BROWN
WOODRUFF
EWING
HOHENER
HOWARD
HUNT
KEITH
KENNEY
LYNCH
MADDOX
MARTINSON
PIERSALL
STEVENS
11/25/75 SPECIAL MEETING (ALL DISTS.)
#5(a) Report of Joint Chairman
Chairman Winn reported that Directors Store, Callahan, Cox and he met with a
group from the EPA in San Francisco and SWRCB in Sacramento earlier that day.
Very informative meeting. Discussed JPL vs . conventional secondary treatment.
Came up with agreement by two agencies that will be submitted to Executive
Committee next month and then to the Joint Boards for review and discussion.
EPA and State indicated that final decision will be ours and that is what we wanted.
(Continued below)
#S(b) Report of General Manager
Referred to the material in Directors' folders--draft letter received from County
Supervisors' office having to do with consideration of engaging of former
Congressman Dick Hanna as representative for Cotmty and several other agencies.
It has been suggested that the Sanitation Districts participate financially with
idea of receiving some assistance in Washington on legislative matters. We do
have adequate representation in Washington through />YBA as far as dealing with
EPA. However, the areas that we need assistance is in working with the California
delegation . Very difficult to get them to move on things that are important for
us here in Southern California. Don't have someone back there to get them together
and tell the story. Such as on ad valorem taxes, haven't been able to get the
California delegation to push off on Bill pending on House side. They are largest
delegation in Congress and can do things if we could them wtified. Could be a
great deal of assistance to us. This will be on the agenda for the Decewber 10th
meeting.
#S(a) Winn then added that EPA people indicated they are asking for $42 billion to clean
(Cont.)up environment. Need $12 billion within next two years. Have requested e xtension
of 1977 deadline but don't know if they will get it or not.
EXECUTIVE SESSION 6:18 -6:53 p.m.
17 "Section 208" Planning
FAH reported that he and Director Wood attended meeting. As of today the re isn't
a clear cut answer as far as State is concerned as to what to do . Not sure we
have a nother recommendation other than there are several different proposals
floating around. Mentioned that one proposal was from SAWPA (and advised that
Bob Moore of SAWPA was in the back of the room) which is form an alliance of
various agencies in Santa Ana River Basin, leaving out LA area. Mr. Harper said
that probably the best thing under the circumstances since we don't have any
direction from the State, is possibly for a committee to be· appointed to review
some of these matters and report back to the Board on Decewher 10th. Hearing
record will be left open until December 15th. Winn said he concurred with that
and wanted additional input to come from various agencies.
Winn appointed committee to make recommendation at next Board me eting :
Donald Saltarelli, Chairman
Vernon Evans
Robin Yol.lll.g
Frances Wood
Thomas McKnew
Jesse Davis
Phillip Cox
Asked Chairman Salt a relli to pick a date for me e ting and Mr. Ha rp e r would me et with
them on Dec e mber 8th.