Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-11-25COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) November 20, 1975 NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETHJG DISTRICTS NOS. lJ 2J 3J 5J 6J 7 & 11 TUESDAY) NOVEMBER 25) 1975, 6:00 PaM. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY) CALIFORNIA TELE PH ON ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 I am calling a special meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts :-Tc~. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 aT1d 11 of Orarige Cow:..ty, Califo:niia., at t~-H:: above hour and date. The purpose of the meeting is as follows: A. Consideration cf employee wages and fringe benefits B. Staff report and further discussion regarding "Section 208" planning for the Sut~thern California area. (Area-wide planning pursuant to the provisions of the 1972 Amendments to the federal Water Pollution Control Act) Don Winn Joint Chnirman MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS Special Meeting November 25, 1975 -6:00 p.m. Post Office Box 81 2 7 10844 Ell is Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 Chairman Winn has called a special meeting of the Boards Tuesday, November 25th, for the purpose of further consideration of the Districts' employees' salary and fringe benefits adjustments and additional discussions relative to PL 92-500 "208" planning designation for the South Coast Area. No. 6 -Employee Wages and Fringe Benefits Enclosed for the Directors is a confidential staff report regarding negotiations to date. Two additional meet-and-confer sessions have been scheduled for November 24th and 25th prior to the special 6:00 p .m., Tuesday meeting of the Joint Boards. No. 7 -"208" Planning Designation Included with the agenda material is a copy of the staff's November 17th presentation to the State Hearing Board. The Chairman of the Hearing Board, State Board member Don Maughan, has advised the hearing record will be left open for additional recommendations and testimony until December 1 5t h. Chairman Winn has indicated that in the event the Boards are not able to reach a decision Tuesday relative to "208 " planning designation in the South Coast area, he will appoint a committee of Directors who will recommend a course of action at the regular Joint meeting on December 10th. Fred A. Harper Gener al Manager II -. BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 El I is Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS SPECIAL MEETING NOVEMBER 25J 1975 -6:00 PaM. Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call ~~,-~ (3) · Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary ~\A.\,?_ ~~ (4) Consideration of motion to reeeive 8:ftd file minute e*eeFpts, if eny (5) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: @) Joint Chainnan ~ General Manager {e) General C-otms·e-l (6) ALL DISTRICTS (8) (a) (b) (c) Consideration of motion to convene in executive session '<li re personnel matters (employee wages and fringe benefits) u Consideration of motion to reconvene in regular session "·.59 Consideration of action on items considered in executive session ALL DISTRICTS Staff report and further discussion regarding "Section 208" planning for the Southern Califoniia area (Area-wide planning pursuant to the provisions of the 1972 Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act) See attachment. ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to adjourn CQ·.5 8 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 November 17, 1975 (71.C) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 TO: 208 Planning Designation Hearing Board of the State Water Resources Control Board RE: Public Hearing to be Held at 10:00 a.m., November 17, 1975, in Room L-6, Los Angeles County Health Service Auditorium, 313 North Figueroa, Los Angeles, CA The governing body of the Orange County Sanitation Districts appreciate the opportunity to express their views relative to the matter of 208 Planning for the South Coast area. However·, as of this date, our Boards of Directors have not reached a decision as to an appropriate area(s) and/or planning agency(s) for designation for areawide waste treatment management planning. The Directors have under consideration the following proposals: (1) That the entire South Coast area be designated and that the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) be designated as the planning agency (2) That the entire South Coast area be designated; however, with a planning agency formed through a Joint Powers Agreement involving the City of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles and Orange County Sanitation Districts, Counties of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside San Bernardino and possibly Ventura, the Metropolitan Water District, the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, etc., with each entity accepting the responsibility of doing the planning within their expertise. ioB Planning Designation Hearing Board November 17, 1975 Page 2 (3) That the South Coast area be broken into County planning areas and the designation of separate 208 planning agencies involving Joint Powers arrangements in each of the counties to bring the required disciplines together (4) That the entire South Coast area be designated with SCAG as the lead agency, with a stipulation that the respective· governing bodies of those agencies responsible for implementation must • • , ' 0 "'v .&..;:-7: • .1."iP 2 'v-' o"' D .L. ~ .,...ll re .J..i a~ t: l' ""'.LlQ'. t. 0 approve tna~ portion -'~ r ~ -0 their activities prior to adoption by the designated 208 planning agency (5) A 5th proposal was submitted for our con- sideration on November 12 from the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority. This proposal, which has not been studied by our elected officials, pro- poses the Santa Ana River Basin area for areawide wastewater designation, and designation of an alliance formed by a Joint Powers Agreement by the Counties of Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino, the Cities of Chino, Corona, Beaumont, Fontana, San Bernardino, Redlands, Ontario, Upland, and Yucaipa, as well as special districts Orange 208 Planning Designation Hearing Board November 17, 1975 Page 2 County Sanitation Districts, Irvine Ranch Water District, Newport-Irvine Wastewater Management Agency and the Eastern Municipal Water District. Our Boards of Directors need additional time to review these proposals and any others that may be presented at today's hearing. Therefore, we respectfully request that the hearing record be held open to December 15_to enable the governing body of the Orange County Sanitation Districts the opportunity to express their desires with regard to area designation(s) and the appropriate planning agency(s) designation. c£~ir Fred A. Harper General Manager A G E N D A COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNl.A P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-241 l Re: November 25th -10:30 a.m. Meeting to Discuss Construction Grants for Improved Treatment at Orange County Sanitation Districts' Facilities Enclosed is a status report of the facilities planning efforts presently authorized under a Step 1 Grant No. C-06-1073 which will be discussed in further detail at the above-mentioned meeting. We would like to suggest the following agenda items for discussion purposes: 10:30 a.m. 10:45 a.m. 11:00 2..T. .. 11:30 a.m. 12:15 p.m. 1:15 2:00 p.rn. An over-all review of the current and future construction grant programs at the federal level An over-all review of the current and future construction grant programs at the State level · A disc~ssicn conce~ni~g the status of the Facilities Plan.and the Environmental Impact Statement to be presented by Mr. Harvey Hunt of John Carollo Engineers and Mr. Jerry Gilbert of Gilbert and Associates Discussions of alternate methods of imple- mentation of improved treatment facilities Luncheon General Discussion of Items Presented Adjourn There are certain questions which have become apparent in recent months on which members of our Boards of Directors and staff would like the Environmental Protection Agency's and State's guidance. These are as follows: 1. Can the Districts commence any engineering design efforts before completion of the final Environmental Impact Statement? 2. To what extent can preliminary engineering design be authorized under a Step 1 grant? 3. Since the Sanitation Districts are in a critic~l air basin, should the treatment expansion to accommodate future growth be designed to accom- modate the Districts' population projections without the State and Envirorunental Protection Agency participation or restricted to that as provided for by the E-0 population growth as approved by the State? 4. What is the status of .the retention of the payment of the final 20 percent of grant monies made conditional upon the implementation and approval of a revenue program (user charge system)? COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA . P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) November 19, 1975 NOTICE TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Donald Winn, Joint Chairman Norma Gibbs, Vice Joint Chairman Kerm Rima Michael Callahan Phillip Cox Don Mcinnis John Store John Garthe Laurence Schmit Re: November 25th, 10:30 a.m., Meeting -Newport Marriott Hotel -Discussion of Construction Grants for Improved Treatment at Orange County Sanitation Districts' Fac:iliti~s TELEPHONES: AR EA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 As previously an~ounced, the Committee will be meeting with representatives from EPA and the State Water Resources Control Board next Tuesday morning at the Newport Marriott Hotel, Pacific Ballroom, Suite B. We will be reviewing the status of our Step 1 planning effort and discussing other possible courses of action which may speed up construction of facilities to meet State and Federal requirements. Enclosed is a brief agenda which we have prepared for the meeting, along with a status report on the Step 1 Facilities Plan. Enclosures d1 !?, ~t-'-'- Fred A. Harper . General Manager ,.. A G E N D A COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNl.A P. 0 . BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORN I A 92708 (714) S-40-2910 (71-4) 962-241 l Re: November 25th -10:30 a.m. Meeting to Discuss Construction Grants for Improved Treatment at Orange County Sanitation Districts' Facilities Enclosed is a status report of the facilities planning efforts presently authorized under a Step 1 Grant No. C-06-1073 which will be discussed in further detail at the above-mentioned meeting. We would like to suggest the following agenda items for discussion purposes: 10:30 a.m. 10:45 a.m. 11:00 a.m. 11:30 a.m. 12:15 p.m. 1:15 2:00 p.m. An over-all review of the current and future construction grant progra~s at the federal level An over-all review of the ·current and future construction grant programs at the State level A discussion concerning the status of the Facilities Plan .and the Environmental Impact Statement to be presented by Mr. Harvey Hunt of John Carollo Engineers and Mr. Jerry Gilbert of Gilbert and Ass o ciates Discussions of alternate methods of imple- mentation of impr9ved treatment facilities Luncheon General Discussion of Items Presented Adjourn There are certain questions which have become apparent in recent months on which members of our Boards of Directors and staff would like the Environmental Protection Agency's and State's guidance. These are as follows: ·1. Can the Districts commence any engineering design efforts before completion of the final Env.ironmental Impact Statement? 2. To what extent can preliminary engineering design · be ·authorized under a Step 1 grant? ·. . 3. Since the Sanitation Districts are in a critical air basin, should the treatment expansion to accommodate future growth be designed to accom- modate the Districts' population projections without the State and Environmental Protection Agency participation or restricted to that as provided for by the E-0 population growth as approved by the State? · · 4. What is the status of the retenti o n of the payment of the final 20 percent of grant monies made conditional upon the implementation and approval of a revenue program (user charge system)? I \ / . . ... ! .~ \ 1GENDA ITEM NO. 5 (B) I ; I , ~ ·ttov~mber 24, 1975 J Honorabl e Board of Superv isors Count y of Orange Santa Ana, CA SUBJECT: l·Jashington Office Implemen tation Plan Gentlemen: On November 18, 1975, your Honorable Board directed the Administrative Office to develop the most economically and operationa~ly effective method of establishing a Washington office. This plan has been developed with the assistance of Richard T. Hanna, member of Congress, retired, alon q the li ne of his letter probosal to your Honor able Board dated November 8, 1975, and with the Orange County Transit Distri st which has agreed to jointl y fund t he Washington office. Co~t Estimate -Washinqton Office and Staff Services of Richard T. Hanna Expenses of Richard T. Hanna Air fare @ $500 round trip Lod gi ng, mea l s, incidentals Legislative Assistant Receptioni s t/Secretary Office rent Telephone Utilitie s Miscellan eo us Office furniture (FY 1975-76) Annually $30,000 6,000 9,000 20,000 12,000 6,700 3,600 1,200 1,500 $90,00 0 Jan.-June 1 76 $15,000 3,000 4,500 10 ,000 . 6,000 3,350 l ,800 600 75 0 $45,000 1,000 $46,0 00 . ;f."_ -2- .Proposed Imnl ementa ti on Schedule A. Board of OCTD approval of plan December 1, 1975 B. Board of Supervisors approval of plan December 9, 1975 C. Effective date of agreement with Richard T. Hanna January l, 1976 D. Lease of office and employment of Receptionist/ Secretary in Washington, D.C. January 1976 E. Recruitment and employment of Legislative Assistant January 1976 F. Operatio~lWashington office February 1, 1976 I\ Proposed Implementation Plan It is proposed that Mr. Hanna be retained as an independent contractor representing both the County and the Orange County Transit District in a #f fJ...a 4,,.#\11 manner similar to the agreemen~with Ted Craig, the County's Sacramento lobbyist. An agreement acceptable to Mr. Hanna· and signed by him is enclosed. Fonowing the precedent of the County's Sacramento office, it is proposed that the Washington office staff of a Receptionist/Secretary and a Legislative Assistant be retained by contract rather than being hired as ·county employees. Selection and approval of the Receptionist/Secretary would be delegated to Mr. Hanna. Nomination of the Legislative Assistant would be delegated to Mr. Hanna subject to interview and approval by your Honorable Board and the Board of the Orange County Transit District. Budgetary cognizance and approval of statements for personal services and expenses, travel, office rent, telephone charges, purchase of office supplies, an~ other expenditures of the Washington office would be assigned to the Budget-Legislation-Grants Division. of this office, in keeping with similar responsibility for the Sacramento office. The Administrative Office would ··' '--" report \~ashington office expenditures monthly to the Orange County Transit District. -3- Proposed Local Coordination and Staff ~Q!J. . Local coordination and staff support will be simlar to that which is provided to the County's Sacramento office. The Budqet-Legislation-Grants Division of the Administrative Office will coordinate all routine contracts between the Washington office, the County Legislative Planninn Committee, County agencies and departments, and the Orange County Transit District. This will provide efficient, orderly and accountable action on all matters requiring written follow-up withou-t'restricting the ability of Mr. Hanna to telephone directly to members of your Honorable Board, or to executive mana.gement or other key personnel of the County or Transit District \·1hen more appropriate. Analysis of cost or procedural impacts of proposed Federal le0islation received from the Wash·ington office will be coordinated b.v the Administrative agencies and departments, following the procedures currently in operation for State legislation. No increase in the staff of the Administrative Office will be requested for this additional workload in the remainder of Fiscal Year 1975-76. Present staff supporting the Sacramento office will be augmented by temporary assignment of other Administrative Office personnel and Transit District personnel when required. It is anticipated that one additional full-time staff person may be required to coordinate activities of the Sacramento and . Washington offices in FY 1976-77, but not necessarily requ i~t:'J an addition to the total Administrative Office staff. This workload requirement \vill ·be more accurately evaluated when we have experience with supportin~ a Washington office. ( -'+-( CONCWSION: As requested by your Honorable Board on November ·18, 1975 to develop the most economical and operationally effective method of establishing a Washington office it is proposed that the office be jointly funded by the County and the 0 range County Transit District, using present procedures of the County's Sacramento office. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Authorize the transfer of $41,400 of currently frozen excess funds from Budget Unit 0916 to Budget Unit 0146 - Legislation, Account 190 -Professional/Specialized ~,;. • -re ... '!h.s Services, to provide~afle ~ilf of the funds for the establishment and operation of an Orange County Washington office from January l, through June 30, 1976. 2. Appropriate $4,600 as unanticipated revenue from the ufan~_12 County fra11si t lJistrict in reventi':: ai..:count / 13 and in Budget Unit 0146 -Legislation, Account 190 - Professional/Specialized Services, to provide ten percent of the funds for the establishment and operation of an Orange County Washington office from January l through June 30, 1976. 3. Approve and authorize the Chairman of the Board to sign the enclosed agreement between the County, OCTD and Richard T. Hanna for the personal services of r1r. Hanna, as described in the agreement, as Orange County's Washington Representative. ,t - ( ( -5-( 4. Authorize Richard T. Hanna to proceed as necessarv within the terms of the agreement to establish an operative Washington office by February 1, 1976. ( \ . ., -""- ......, . 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .J > II.It- IL WI Z 15 c z :> :> 0 I!! 0 u uU 16 -Ill IL>() IL I-z 0 z <( =>a: 17 eo 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ~ 31 32 JWA:ks F 0192·1.2 FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE ADVOCATES SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into on the day of December, 1975, between the County of Qrange, hereinafter referred to as COUNTY, and Richard T. Hanna, hereinafter referred to as MR. HANNA. and regulation WHEREAS, the impact of federal legislation/on local government is constantly on the increase, necessitating a closer awareness and greater participation in the adoption of such legislation and regulation, and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors desires to contract for the ser- vices of a per~on who is by training and experience competent to act as a legislative advocate for COUNTY, and WHEREAS, MR. HANNA possesses the educationj training, and experi- ence necessary to provide the desired services, IT IS HEREBY ~U'l'UALLY AGREES AS .t<"'OLLOWS: 1. The term of this agreement shall commence on January 1, 1976, and continue until such time as it is terminated,.by either party upon ~he giving of a thirty-day notice in writing. 2. MR. HANNA's services as the County's Legislative Advocate shall: be rendered under the direction and supervision of the Orange County Board of Supervisors except as hereinafter set forth in Paragraph 6. 3. MR. HANNA's services shall be as an independent contractor and he shall not be an employee of COUNTY. 4. MR. HANNA's services as a legislative advocate shall be per- formed exclusively for COUNTY and he shall not act in the same or similar capacity for any other public agency except as agreed upon between MR. HANNA and COUNTY as hereinafter set forth. 5. In consideration of MR. HANNA's rendering the follo~ing ser7 vices to COUNTY and to other Orange County local public entities, as hereinafter provided, COUNTY shall pay to MR. HANNA the sum of $2500 per calendar month, payable on or before the 10th day of each month, 1. l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ..J > .., ... IL on Z 1 <i . 0 z ::> ~ 11 :::>" iol 0 v I uU 16 ii:>~ Ii. ... z oz< =>a: 17 30 18 19 20 21 22 23 ·24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 f 0192.1.2 commencing January 1, 1976, and continuing until this Agreement is terminated in the manner set forth above. (a) Set up an operative office in Washington, D. c~,employing one Secretary and one Legislative Assistant, both of whom shall render full time service. (b) Advocate the interests of COUNTY in federal legislation. (c) Provide Congressional delegates and their staffs with details of cost and procedural impact of proposed federal legislation on County. (d) Provide access for local governmental and private experts to assist in drafting and t~stifying on proposed federal legislation which would impact COUNTY. (e) Determine available programs for grants and funds for which COUNTY appears to be qualified. (f) Assist in the structuring of grant applications and cooperate with whatever agency of COUNTY is determined to be the appropriate agency to initiate said application. (g) Monitor, assist and expedite all such grant applications. (h) Provide any service related to legislative or agency regul- lation which would affect funding programs and any and all ancillary activities associated therewith. (i) When requested to do so by COUNTY or other local public i entity authorized to participate in this Agreement, provide copies of all' I proposed federal legislation and regulation impacting all COUNTY or such 1 I other local public entities with recommendations on positions to be taken: by COUNTY or such other local public entities. (6) COUNTY, with MR. HANNA's approval, may enter ·into agreements with other Orange County local public entities to permit such public entities to utilize the services of MR. HANNA for some or all of those services MR. HANNA is required to provide COUNTY. Such agreements may provide that such public entities shall be entitled to a percentage of MR. HANNA's services provided, however, that MR. HANNA shall be the 2. .. ..._,.: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .J > 1&11- IL" Z 15 0 z :> :> 0 w 0 IJ uU 16 k: > ~ I&. I-z 0 z"' =>a: 17 80 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 F om.1.2 sole judge of the proper distribution of his services between on or more participating public entities. As to those public entities authorized to participate in MR. HANNA's services, MR. HANNA shall act under the direction and supervision of the governing body of such local public entity or person designated by such governing body. 7. As further consideration for MR. HANNA's services, he shall be reimbursed for actual and n~cessary expenditures incident to the performance of his services including lodging, travel and meals, includ- ing meals for other persons which MR. HANNA feels are necessarily incident to the services. Reimbursement for travel by private conveyance shall be at the current mileage reimbursements rate for COUNTY employees.I 8. As hereinbefore agreed upo~ reimbursement of expenditures, shall be pa·id monthly, on claims in writing substantiated by such detailed itemization and receipts as requested by the County Auditor- Controller and approved by the.county Administrative Officer. I ' ... AGENDA ITEM NO I 5 "(B) t!ovember 24, 1975 Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Orange Santa Ana, CA SUBJECT: Washington Office Implementation Plan Gentlemen: 0MFT ~ \ On November 18, 1975, your Honorabie Board directed the Administrative Office to develop the most economically and operational_ly effective method of establishing a Washington office. This plan has been developed with the -assistance of Richard T. Hanna, member of Congress, retired, alonq the line of his letter probosal to your Honorable Board dated November 8, 1975, and with the Orange County Transit Distrist which has agreed to jointly fund the Washington office. Co~t Estimate -Washinqton Office and Staff Services of Richard T. Hanna Expenses of Richard T. Hanna Air fare @ $500 round trip Lodging, meals, incidentals Legislative Assistant Receptionist/Secreta~y Office rent Telephone Utilities Miscellaneous Office furniture (FY 1975-76) Annually $30,000 6,000 9,000 20,000 12,000 6,700 3,600 1,200 1,500 $90,000 Jan.-June '76 $15,000 3,000 4,500 10,000 6,000 3,350 1,800 600 750 $45,000 1,000 $46,000 -2- Proposed Imnlementation Schedule A. Board of OCTD approval of plan B. Board of Supervisors approval of plan C. Effective date of agreement with Richard T. Hanna D. Lease of office and employment of Receptionist/ Secretary in Washington, O.C. December 1, 1975 December 9, 1975 January 1, 1976 January 1976 E. Recruitment and employment of Legislative Assistant January 1976 F. Operatio;tWashington office February 1, 1976 I\. Proposed Implementation Plan It is proposed that Mr. Hanna be retained as an independent contractor representing both the County and the Orange County Transit District in a #f fJ..a 4,.. ., 11 manner similar to th~ agreemen~with Ted Craig, the County's Sacramento lobbyist~ An agreement acceptable to Mr. Hanna and signed by him is enclosed. Follm·ling the precedent of the County 1 s Sacramento office, it is proposed that the Washington office staff of a Receptionist/Secretary and a · Legislative Assistant be retained by contract rather than being hired as County employees. Selection and approval of the Receptionist/Secretary would be delegated to Mr. Hanna. Nomination of the Legislative Assistant would be delegated to Mr. Hanna subject to interview and approval by your Honorable Board and the Board of the Orange County Transit District. Budgetary cognizance and approval of statements for personal services and expenses, travel, office rent, telephone charges, purchase of office supplies, an~ other expenditures of the Washington office would be assigned to the Budget-Legislation-Grants Division. of this office, in keeping with similar responsibility for the Sacramento office. The Administrative Office would report Washington office expenditures monthly to the Orange County Tra.nsit Distric~ -3- .Proposed local Coordination and Staff Suppgrt Local coordination and staff support will be simlar to that which is provided to the County's Sacramento office. The Budqet-leqislation-Grants Division of the Administrative Office will coordinate all routine contracts between the Washinqton office, the County Legislative Plannin9 Committee, County agencies and departments, and the Orange County Transit District. This will provide efficient, orderly and accountable action on all matters requiring written follow-up withou-t'restricting the ability of Mr. Hanna to telephone directly to members of your Honorable Board, or to executive management or other key personnel of the County or Transit District \·1hen more appropriate. Anal.Ysis of cost or procedural impacts of proposed Federal le~islation received from the Washington office will be cootdinated by the Administrative Office, but y1i1l ~e p~rforrner:i by affect~d C0u~t~1 ~::d Tr?.risit Di stric:t agenc·ie-s and departments, following the procedures currently in operation for State legislation. No increase in the staff of the Administrative Office will be requested for this additional workload in the remainder of Fiscal Year 1975-76. Present staff supporting the Sacramento office will be augmented by temporary assignment of other Administrative Office personnel and Transit District personnel when required. It is anticipated that one additional full-time staff person may be required to coordinate activities of the Sacramento and . Washington offices in FY 1976-77, but not necessarily requi~~ an addition to the total Administrative Office staff. This workload requirement \-Jill be more accurately evaluated when we have experience with supporting a Washington office. ( -'t-( CONCWSION: As requested by your Honorable Board on November 18, 1975 to develop the most economical and operationally effective method of establishing a Washington office it is proposed that the office be jointly funded by the County and the 0 range County Transit District, using present procedures of the County's Sacramento office. RECOMMENDATION: l. Authorize the transfer of $41,400 of currently frozen excess funds from Budget Unit 0916 to Budget Unit 0146 - Legislation, Account 190 -Professional/Specialized ~,;,._ -Tt,,.'!h' Services, to provide~&l'te ~alf of the funds for the establishment and operation of an Orange County Washington office from January 1, through June 30, 1976. 2. Appropriate $4,600 as unanticipated revenue from the lh-an~Je County Tra11si t Llistr1ct in revenu~ dccoun:.: 71J and in Budget Unit 0146 -Legislation, Account 190 - Professional/Specialized Services, to provide ten percent of the funds for the establishment and operation of an Orange County v!ashi ngtcn office from January 1 through ~une 30, 1976. 3. Approve and authorize the Chairman of the Board to sign the enclosed agreement between the County, OCTD and Richard T. Hanna for the personal services of r1r. Hanna, as described in the agreement, as Orange County's Washington Re~resentative. ( ( -5-( 4. Authorize Richard T. Hanna to proceed as necessary within the terms of the agreement to establish an operative Washington office by February 1, 1976. ( \ . . , - . 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ..J > 1111- IL l'I Z 15 0 z :> :> 0 Ill 0 (,; uV 16 ii:>~ IL I-z oz< =>a: 17 eo 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ~ 31 32 JWA:ks f 0192-1.2 FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE ADVOCATES SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into on the day of December, 1975, between the County of Orange, hereinafter referred to as COUNTY, and Richard T. Hanna, hereinafter referred to as MR. HANNA. and regulation WHEREAS, the impact of federal legislation/on local government is constantly on the increase, necessitating a closer awareness and greater participation in the adoption of such legislation and regulation, and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors desires to contract for the ser- vices of a person who is by training and experience competent to act as a legislative advocate for COUNTY, and WHEREAS, MR. HANNA possesses the e~ucation; training, and experi- ence necessary to provide the desired services, IT IS HEREBY ~UTUALLY AGREES AS FOLLOWS: 1. The term of this agreement shall commence on January 1, 1976, and continue until such time as it is terminated,.by either party upon ·the giving of a thirty-day notice in writing. 2. MR. HANNA's services as the County's Legislative Advocate shall: be rendered under the direction and supervision of the Orange County Board of Supervisors ex~ept as hereinafter set forth in Paragraph 6. 3. MR. HANNA's services shall be as an independent contractor and he shall not be an employee of COUNTY. 4. MR. HANNA's services as a legislative advocate shall be per- formed exclusively for COUNTY and he shall not act in the same or similar capacity for any other public agency except as agreed upon between MR. HANNA and COUNTY as hereinafter set forth •. 5. In consideration of MR. HANNA's rendering the following ser""."' vices to COUNTY and to other Orange County local public entities, as hereinafter provided, COUNTY shall pay to MR. HANNA the sum of $2500 per calendar month, payable on or before the 10th day of each month, 1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ..J > w ... IL~ Z 15 0 -:::> :::>" .. 3 v 16 ~ w IL>~ IL I-Z ozc :>a: 17 80 .18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 f 0192-1.2 c9nunencing January 1, 1976, and continuing until this Agreement is terminated in the manner set forth above. (a) Set up an operative office in Washington, D. c~,employing one Secretary and one Legislative Assistant, both of whom shall render full time service. (b) Advocate the interests of COUNTY in federal legislation. (c) Provide Congressional delegates and their staffs ,with details of cost and procedural impact of proposed federal legislation on County. (d) Provide access for local governmental and private experts to assist in drafting and t~stifying on proposed federal legislation which would impact COUNTY. (e) Deter~ine available programs for grants and funds for which COUNTY appears to be qualified. (f) Assist in the structuring of grant applications and cooperate with whatever agency of COUNTY is determined to be the appropriate agency to initiate said application. (g) Monitor, assist and expedite all such grant applications • (h) Provide any service related to legislative or agency regul- lation which would affect funding programs and any and all ancillary activities associated therewith. (i) When requested to do so by COUNTY or other local public I entity authorized to participate in this Agreement, provide copies of a11: I proposed federal legislation and regulation impacting all COUNTY or such · I other local public entities with recommendations on positions to be taken: by COUNTY or such other local public entities. (6) COUNTY, with MR. HANNA's approval, may enter ·into agreements with other Orange County local public entities to permit such public entities to utilize the services of MR. HANNA for some or all of those services MR. HANNA is required to provide COUNTY. Such agreements may provide that such public entities shall be entitled to a percentage of MR. HANNA' s services provided, -however, that MR. HANNA shall be the 2. "'' 2. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ~> 1111- IL fl Z 15 0 z ::> :l 0 ~I e ~ 16 ~ Ill IL> Cl I&. ... z oz< =>11: 17 80 18 19 20 21 22 23 ·24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 sole judge of the proper distribution of his services between on or more participating public entities. As to those public entities authorized to participate in MR. HANNA's services, MR. HANNA shall act under the direction and supervision of the governing body of such local public entity or person designated by such governing body. 7. As further consideration for MR. HANNA's services, he shall be reimbursed for actual and necessary expenditures incident to the performance of his services including lodging, travel and meals, includ- ing meals for other persons which MR. HANNA feels are necessarily incident to the services. Reimbursement for travel by private conveyance shall be at the current mileage reimbursements rate for COUNTY employees.I 8. As hereinbefore agreed upo~ reimbursement of expenditures, shall be paid monthly, on. claims in writing substantiated by such detailed itemization and receipts as requ~sted by the County Auditor- Controller and approved by the County Administrative Officer. r 11 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 (s) ~ovember 24, 1975 Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Orange Santa Ana, CA SUBJECT: Washington Office Implementation Plan Gentlemen: On November 18, 1975, your Honorable Board directed the Administrative Office to develop the most economically and operationa~ly effective method of establishing a Washington office. This plan has been developed with the . assistance of Richard T. Hanna, member of Congress, retired, alonq the line of his letter pro~osal to your Honorable Board dated November 8, 1975, and with the Orange County Transit Distrist which has agreed to jointly fund the Washington office. Co~t Estimate -Washinqton Office and Staff Services of Richard T. Hanna Expenses of Richard T. Hanna Air fare @ $500 round trip Lodging, meals, incidentals Legislative Assistant Receptionist/Secretary Office rent Telephone Utilities Miscellaneous Office furniture (FY 1975-76) Annually $30,090 6,000 9,000 20,000 12,000 6,700 3,600 1, 200 1,500 $90,000 Jan.-June '76 $15,000 3,000 4,500 10 ,000 6,000 3,350 1,800 600 750 "$45,0oo 1,000 $46,000 ·~ -2- Proposed Imnlementation Schedule A. Board of OCTD approval of plan December 1, 1975 B. Board of Supervisors approval of plan December 9, 1975 C. Effective date of agreement with Richard T.· Hanna Junuary 1, 1976 D. Lease of office and employment of Receptionist/ Secretary in Washington, D.C.· January 1976 E. Recruitment and employment of Legislative Assistant January 1976 F. Operatio~lWashington office February l, 1976 I\. Proposed Implementation Plan It is proposed that Mr. Hanna be retained as an independent contractor representing both the County and the Orange County Transit District in a #f tha C.,.,..,,1y manner similar to the agreemen~with Ted Craig, the County 1 s Sacramento lobbyist. An agreement acceptable to Mr. Hanna and signed by him is enclosed. Following the precedent of the County=s Sacramento office·, it is proposed that the Washington office staff of a Receptionist/Secretary and a Legislative Assistant be retained by contract rather than being hired as County employees. Selection and approval of the Receptionist/Secretary would be delegated to Mr. Hanna. Nomination of the Legislative Assistant would be delegated to Mr. Hanna subject to interview and approval by your Honorable Board and the Board of the Orange County Transit District. Budgetary cognizance and approval of statements for personal services and expenses, travel, office rent, telephone charges, purchase of office supplies, and other expenditures of the Washington office would be assigned to the Budget-Legislation-Grants Division. of this office~ in keeping with similar responsibility for t~e Sacramento office. The Administrative Offic·~ would report Washington office expenditures monthly to the Orange County Tra.nsit District~ -3- Proposed Local Coordination and Staff ~Qrt Local coordination and staff support will be simlar to that which is provided to the County's Sacramento office. The l3udqet-Leqislation-Grants Division of the Administrative Office will coordinate all routine contracts between the Hashington office, the County Legislative Planning Committee, County agencies and departments, and the Orange County Transit District. This will provide efficient, orderly and accountable action on ~11 matters requiring written follow-up withou4t'restricting the ability of Mr. Hanna to telephone directly to members of your Honorable Board, or to executive management or other key personnel of the County or Transit District when more appropriate. Analysis of cost or procedural impacts of proposed Federal legislation received.from the Washington office will be coordinated ~Y the Administrative 0 ff i c e , but •,·ti 11 be per fo ~rn e ':! by a ff er: t e d C 0 t' n t y 3.:: d Tr=.!! s i t Di ::: tr i ct agencies and departments, following the procedures currently in operation for State l egi slat ion. No increase in the staff of the Administrative Office will be requested for this additional workload in the remainder of Fiscal Year 1975-76. Present staff supporting the Sacramento office will be augmented by temporary assignment of other Administrative Office personnel and Transit District personnel when required. It is anticipated that one additional full-time staff person may be required to coordinate activities of the Sacramento and . Washington offices in FY 1976-77, but not necessarily requi~~an addition to the total Administrative Office staff. This workload requirement \-Jill be more accurately evaluated when we have experience with supporting a Washington office. ( -'t-( CONCWSION: As requested by your Honorable Board on November 18, 1975 to develop the most ·economical and operationally effective method of establishing a Washington office it is proposed that the office be jointly funded by the County and the 0 range County Transit District, using present procedures of the County's Sacramento office. RECOMMENDATiml: 1. Authorize the .transfer of $41,400 of curre~tly frozen excess funds from Budget Unit 0916 to Budget Unit 0146 - Legislation, Account 190 -Professional/Specialized ,. ,;. «---te"' 'Tiu Services, to provide~&Re ~ilf of the funds for the establishment and operation of an Orange County Washington office from January l, through June 30, 1976. 2. Appropriate $4,600 as unanticipated revenue from the Or·an~J~ County ·rrM!Si t uistrict in revenw:! account /lJ and in Budget Unit 0146 -Legislation, Account 190 - Professional/Specialized Services, to provide ten percent of the funds for the establishment and operation of an Orange County V!ashington office from January 1 through June 30, 1976. 3. Approve and authorize the Chairman of the Board to sign the enclosed agreement bet\'/een the County, OCTD and Richard T. Hanna for the persona 1 services of t1r. Hanna, as described in the agreement, as Orange County's Washington Representative. ( ( -5-(. 4. Authorize Richard T .. Hanna ·to· proceed as necessary within the terms of· the agreement to establish an operative Washington office by February 1, 1976. ( ~ . 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 -'>- 111 ... II.~ z 15 0 :> g we~ 16 ~ Ill 1&.>-ci II. ... z oz< =>a: 17 eo 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 .....,, 31 32 JWA:ks F 01'2-l.2 }ftJP! /}-!JJjrJ /- FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE ADVOCATES SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into on the day of December, 1975, between the County of Orange, hereinafter referred to as COUNTY, and Richard T. Hanna, hereinafter referred to as MR. HANNA. and regulation WHEREAS, the impact of.federal legislation/on local.government is constantly on the increase, necessitating a closer awareness and greater participation in the adoption of such legislation and regulation, and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors desires to contract for the ser- vices of a person who is by training and experience competent to act as a legislative ~dvocate for COUNTY, and WHEREAS, MR. HAJ.~NA possesses the education; training, and experi- ence necessary to provide the desired services, IT IS HEREBY ~UTUALLY AGREES AS FOLLOWS: 1. The term of this agreement shall commence on January 1, 1976, and continue until such time as it is terrninated,by either party upon the giving of a thirty-day notice in writing. 2. MR. HANNA's services as the County's Legislative Advocate shall: be rendered under the direction and supervision of the Orange County Board of Supervisors except as hereinafter set forth in Paragraph 6. 3. MR. HANNA's services shall be as an independent contractor and he shall not be an employee of COUNTY. 4. MR. HANNA~s services as a legislative advocate shall be per- formed exclusively for COUNTY and he shall not act in the same or similar capacity for any other public agency except as agreed upon between MR. HANNA and COUNTY as hereinafter set forth. 5. In consideration of MR. HANNA's rendering the following ser~ vices to COUNTY and to other Orange County local public entities, as hereinafter provided, COUNTY shall pay to MR. HANNA the sum of $2500 per calendar month, payable on or before the 10th day of each month, 1. ·-r 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ~> II.It- IL~ 2 15 11 0 -::> ::>,. ... 0 ~ UV 16 ~ Ill IL> I) IL I-2 oz< =>a: 17 ~o 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 f 01'2° l.2 commencing January 1, 1976, and continuing until this Agreement is terminated in the manner set forth above. (a) Set up an operative office in Washington, D. c~,employing one Secretary and one Legislative Assistant. both of whom shall render full time service. (b) Advocate the interests of COUNTY in federal legislation. (c) Provide Congressional delegates and their staffs with details of cost and procedural impact of proposed federal legislation on County. (d) Provide access for local governmental and private experts to assist in drafting and t~stifying on proposed federal legislation which would impact COUN.TY. (e) Determine available programs for grants and funds for which COUNTY appears to be qualified. (f) Assist in the structuring of grant applications and cooperate with whatever agency of COUNTY is determined to be the appropriate agency to initiate said application. (g) Monitor, assist and expedite all such grant applications. (h) Provide any service related to legislative or agency regul- lation which would affect funding programs and any and all ancillary activities associated therewith. (i) When requested to do so by COUNTY or other local public ! entity authorized to participate in this Agreement, provide copies of all~ I proposed federal legislation and regulation impacting all COUNTY or such · i other local public entities with recommendations on positions to be taken:. by COUNTY or such other local public entities. (6) COUNTY, with MR. HANNA's approval, may enter ·into agreements with other Orange County local public entities to permit such public entities to utilize the services of MR. HANNA for some or all cf those services MR. HANNA is required to provide COUNTY. Such agreem(nts may provide that such public entities shall be entitled to a percentage of MR. HANNA's services provided, however, that MR. HANNA shall be the 2. ""-"' ' sole judge of the proper distribution of his services between on or . 2 more participating public entities •. As to those public entities 3 authorized to participate in MR. HANNA's services, MR. HANNA shall 4 act under the direction and supervision of the governing body of such 5 local public entity or person ~esignated by such governing body. 6 7. As further consideration for MR. HANNA's services, he shall 7 be reimbursed for actual and necessary expenditures incident to the 8 performance of his services including lodging, travel and meals, includ- 9 ing meals for other persons which MR. HANNA feels are necessarily 10 11 incident to the services. Reimbursement for travel by private conveyance I shall be at the current mileage reimbursements rate for COUNTY employees.! 12 8. As hereinbefore agreed upo~ reimbursement of expenditures, 13 shall be paid monthly, on. claims in writing substantiated by such 14 detailed itemization and receipts as requested by the County Auditor- ..I> Ill~ IL fl Z 15 0 z ::> ::> 0 Ill 0 ~ IJ u 16 ii:>~ IL~ z OZ-c =>a: 17 ~o Controller and approved by the County Administrative Officer. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 __... 31 32 f 0192· l.2 • It MEET I NG DATE November 25, 1975 TIME 6·00 p ID DISTRICTS 1,2 ,3 ,5 ,6,7 & 11 DISTRICT 1 RIMA ••..•• _&:.___ ---- 1 -) I I EDR ICH •••.• BATTIN • • • • ------~VANS) ••.••.•• 61\RTllE-•••• _./_ ---- (SHARP) •••••••• SALTARELLI · _:!_ ---- DISTRICT 2 LYONS ········CALLAHAN···__.!___ ---- EWING .. • •• • •• CHAPUT •.••• _./ ____ _ DIEDRICH) •• •• .CLARK •••••• _./ ____ _ GARTf:iE) •.•.••. EVANS •...•• _v ____ _ THOM) ••••••••. KAYWOOD •••• ~ __ __ FOX) ••••.••..• MAC KAIN .•• _./ ____ _ PERRY. • • • • • v !SVALSTAD) • • • •• SCOTT ••••• • ./ == == PEREZ) ••••••• ::lAC.~ti\~N •••• ~ ___ _ DUNN~) ........ WINN ...... • v WARD) ••••••.•• WOOD •••• r. -1 · -./-----) 'oo ---GRAHAM ••••••• YOUNG •• J ... _V ____ _ DISTRICT 3 (HOMRIGHAUSEN). COX········ _./_ ---- AMO.···· ••• ~ ___ _ (COLL I NS)· • • • • · BYRNE. • • • • • __:!___ ___ _ CULVER···.· _:!.__ ___ _ GRIFFIN).·····~···· _v'_ ---- GARTHE). ······EVANS······ __.!____ ___ _ MAC K~IN)' 1:: .. ;~ FOX······.· _.; ____ _ SONJU • • • ¥(· FRANKIEWICH ~ ___ _ NEVIl-· ·······GRAHAM •••.. _L_ ___ _ THOM).·····.·. KAYWOOD •.•• ~ ___ _ BLACKMAN) ••••• MC KNEW.... ./ DIEDRJCH) ••••• SCHMIT .•••• _.:!..._ ___ _ GI BBS) •••••••• SH I PLEY. · • ./ STANTON) •••••• SVALSTAD ••• -..;----- WOOD) ••••••••• WARD.-:-••.•• -I ----- ARB I SO) ••••••• WEISHAUPT. tAJ == == DISTRICT 5 ~RYCKOFF ). • • • • • MC INNIS· · • . DIEDRICH).···· RILEY····· J ------_L ___ _ ROGERS • • • • ----d----- DISTRICT 6 (Mc INN Is) ••••• STORE .••.•• _J _ ---- (DIEDRICH) ••••• BATTIN •.••. _:!._ ___ _ RIMA ••••••• ---1JL_ ___ _ DISTRICT 7 J ~ EV ANS) . • • • . . . GA-R-i'l1F •.••• __ __ __ 'THO NY) • • • • · BURTON • • • · • _/ ___ --brt EDR I CH)···· CLARK • • • • • _L_ ___ _ (Mc INN Is) •••• DOSTAt ••••• _:i__ ---- GLOCKNER · • • _:{__ ___ _ ( ) • · • • • • JACKMAN • · • • ~ ___ _ (SHARP) • · • • • • • SALTARELLI · ___!.___ ___ _ DISTRICT 11 (DIEDRICH) •••• SCHMIT ••••• _/ ____ _ (GIBBS) •.••••• DUKE ••••••• + ___ _ (w I EDER) •••••• G !BBS •••• • • _____ _ DISTRICT 8 MITCHELL··· __ ---- (JOHNSoNi • · • • • HOLM • • · • • • • ____ -- (DIEDRICH)···· RILEY •.•.•• _____ _ 5/29/75 JOINT BOARDS AMO · · · · · · · · ___ . (DIEDRICr) ••.•• BATTIN • • • • • ____ _ ~ANTHONY ••••.• BURTON····· __ _ COLLI~S •••••• BYRNE······· __ -- LYONS ••••.••• CALLAHAN··· __ _ EWING •••••••. CHAPUT······ __ _ (DI EDR !CH) •••• • CLARK······· ___ _ (HOMRIGHAUSEN) ·COX········· ___ _ CULVER ······ ___ _ GRIFFIN) ••••• ·DAVIS······· ___ _ MC INN Is). •••. DOSTAL· • • · • • __ GIBBS) •••••••• DUKE.······· GARTHE) ..•••• ·EVANS·· • • • • • ---- MAC K1IN) .•.•• FOX ••••••••• ---- SONJU •••••••• FRANKIEWICH.== == EVANS ~ ....... GARTHE ...... ___ _ WIEDERJ •••••.• GIBBS ••••••• ___ _ GLOCKNER •••• NEVIL)j •.••••• GRAHAM,·····==== ••••••• JACKMAN ••••• THOM) •••.•••.• KAYWOOD ••••• ==== FOX)."\··· •••. MAC KAIN •••• RYCOFFJ.< ••••• MC INNIS •••• ==== BLACKMANJ .••.• MC KNEW ••••• ----PERRY ••.•... (DIEDRICH).··· ·RILEY.······==== RIMA •••••.•• ___ _ ROGERS •••••. ___ _ SHARP) .••••••• SALTARELLI.. ___ _ DIEDRICH) .•••. SCHMIT •••••. ___ _ SVALSTAD) ••••. SCOTT ••••••• __ -- GIBBS) •••. • • •. SH I PLEY • • • • • ___ _ MC INN Is)·· · ··STORE·· · • • • • ___ _ STANTON)· · • • · • SVALSTAD· • • • ___ _ PEREZ)· • • • • • • • • • · • · • ___ _ WOOD)· • • · · • • · ·WARD· • • • · • • • ___ _ ARBISO) ••• ··.·WEISHAUPT.·· ___ _ DUNN~)· • · • • • • ·WINN. • • • • • • • ___ _ WARD) ••••• • •.• WOOD. • •• • • • • ___ _ GRAHAM)· • • • • • · YOUNG. · • · • • • ___ _ OTHERS ' HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS CLARKE TAYLOR BROWN WOODRUFF EWING HOHENER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVEN S v -v'- -il_ -r -r MEET I NG DATE November 25, 1975 T I ME 6 : 00 p. m. DISTRICTS 1.2,3.5,6, 7 & 11 DISTRICT 1 RIMA •••••• ~ ---- ' ·IEDRICH) ••• ··BATTIN.··· ~ ---~VANS).'YM~·. 6ARTHf! •••• _JC:_ --- lSHARP) •••••••• SALTARELLI·~ ---- DISTRICT 2 LYONS · • · • • • • ·CALLAHAN· • • ~ ----EWING .••••••• CHAPUT ••••• ~ ___ _ DIEDRICH) ••••• CLARK •••••• ~ ___ _ GARTtiE) ..••••• EVANS •••••• ~ ___ _ THO~) ••.•••••• KAYWOOD .••• ~ ___ _ FOX) •••.• ••• •• MAC KAIN •• ·~ ___ _ PERRY •••••• __JL. ___ _ !SVALSTAD) • •••• SCOTT...... ~ ___ _ PEREZ) •••••••• ::fAOCN\AN. • • • Q.,., ___ _ DUNNE).······ .WINN •••• ••• ~ WARD) ••••••••• WOOD. • • • • • • v- GRAHAM) ••••••• YOUNG •••••• ~======== DISTRICT 3 (HOMRIGHAUSEN).cox •••••••• ~ ---- AMO·.· ••••• ~ ___ _ (COLL I NS) •••••• BYRNE· •• t •• ~ ---- CULVER· •••• ~ ___ _ GR I FF IN)· • • • • • lM\' Is. · · · · · ____k::::_ ___ _ GARTHE)· • • • • • • EVANS······ ~ ___ _ MAC K~IN) ..... Fox ........ __k::::_ ---- SOPMU -~FRANl<IEHICH ~ ___ _ NEVIL-• ·······GRAHAM •• • •• ~ ___ _ THOM) .. ••• .. •• KAYWOOD.... 0-___ _ BLACKMAN).···· MC KNEW.... v-___ _ DIEDRJCH) ••••• SCHMIT ••••• ~ ___ _ GIBBS) •••••••• SHIPLEY.... ~ ___ _ STANTON) •••••• SVALSTAD... V' ___ _ wooD} ••••••••• ~ ••••••• y'""" ARBISO) ••••••• WEISHAUPT. a..,, ==== ==== DISTRICT 5 (RYCKOFF). ·····MC INNIS··· ~ __ -- (DIEDRICH).···· RILEY····· ~ __ -- ROGERS • • • • ~ ___ _ DISTRICT 6 (MC INN Is) ••••• STORE •••••• ~ ___ _ (DIEDRICH) ••••• BATTIN ••••• v--___ _ R I MA • • • . • • • 0...., __ __ DISTRICT 7 {EVANS) · • · • • • • QA~TME • · · • • ~ ---- ( THONY) • • • • • BURTON· • • • • ~ ---- (1'1 EDR I CH)···· CLARK • • • • • ~ ---- (MC INNIS)···· B8STAL • • • • • ~ ---- GLOCKNER···~ __ -- ( ) • • • • • • JACKMAN • • • • ~ __ -- (SHARP)· -~~SALTARELLI·~ ___ _ DISTRICT 11 (DIEDRJCH) •••• SCHMIT.···· V __ -- (GIBBS) ••••••• DUKE ••• •••• ~ ___ _ (WIEDER) ...... GIBBS ...... _iL ___ _ DI TRICT 8 MIT (Jo I oN~ ••••• (DIEDR • • RILEY······ ____ -- 5/29/75 JOINT BOARDS AMO • • · • • • • • ___ . DIEDRICr) ••••• BATTIN • • • • • ___ _ ANTHONY •••••• BURTON • • • • • __ -- COLL I~S •••••• BYRNE······· ___ _ LYONS •••••••• CALLAHAN • • • ___ _ EWING •••••••• CHAPUT···· .. ___ _ DIEDRICH) ••••• CLARK· • • • • • • ___ _ HOMR I GHAUSEN). COX···· • • • • • __ · __ CULVER······ ___ _ GRIFFIN) ••••• -DAVIS······· ___ _ MC INNIS) ••••• DOSTAL······--__ GIBBS) •••••••• DUKE.······· ___ _ GARTHE) ••••••• EVANS······· MAC KJIN) ••••• FOX ••••••••• ==.== ==== SONJU •••••••• FRANKIEWICH. ___ _ EVANS ••••••. GARTHE •••••• WIEDERJ ••••••• GIBBS ••••••• ==.== ==== GLOCKNER •••• NEVIL)\···· ••. GRAHAM •••••• ===:===== J ••••••• JACKMAN ••••• THO~) ••••••••• KAYWOOD ••••• ==.== ==== FOX) •• \ ••••••. MAC KAIN •••• RYCOFFJ.~ ••••• MC INNIS •••• ==:===== BLACKMANJ •••.• MC KNEW ••••• ----PERRY ••••••• (DIEDRICH). ····RILEY·······====== RIMA •••••••• ---- ROGERS •••••• ---- SHARP). ••••••• SALTARELLI.. __ -- DIEDRICH). •••• SCHMIT •••••• __ -- SVALSTAD). •••• SCOTT ••••••• ---- GI BBS) •••••••• SHIPLEY····· __ -- MC INN Is)····· STORE·· .. ••• __ -- STANTON)······ SVALSTAD· • • • __ -- PEREZ)· • • • • • • • • • • • • • ___ _ wooD) ••••••••• WARD· ••••••• ___ _ ARB I So) ••••••• WEISHAUPT··· ___ _ DUNNE)· • • • • • • ·WINN· • • • • • • • ___ _ WARD) ••••••.•• wooD •••••••• ___ _ GRAHAM) ••••••• YOUNG······· ___ _ OTHERS HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS CLARKE TAYLOR BROWN WOODRUFF EWING HOHENER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVENS 11/25/75 SPECIAL MEETING (ALL DISTS.) #5(a) Report of Joint Chairman Chairman Winn reported that Directors Store, Callahan, Cox and he met with a group from the EPA in San Francisco and SWRCB in Sacramento earlier that day. Very informative meeting. Discussed JPL vs . conventional secondary treatment. Came up with agreement by two agencies that will be submitted to Executive Committee next month and then to the Joint Boards for review and discussion. EPA and State indicated that final decision will be ours and that is what we wanted. (Continued below) #S(b) Report of General Manager Referred to the material in Directors' folders--draft letter received from County Supervisors' office having to do with consideration of engaging of former Congressman Dick Hanna as representative for Cotmty and several other agencies. It has been suggested that the Sanitation Districts participate financially with idea of receiving some assistance in Washington on legislative matters. We do have adequate representation in Washington through />YBA as far as dealing with EPA. However, the areas that we need assistance is in working with the California delegation . Very difficult to get them to move on things that are important for us here in Southern California. Don't have someone back there to get them together and tell the story. Such as on ad valorem taxes, haven't been able to get the California delegation to push off on Bill pending on House side. They are largest delegation in Congress and can do things if we could them wtified. Could be a great deal of assistance to us. This will be on the agenda for the Decewber 10th meeting. #S(a) Winn then added that EPA people indicated they are asking for $42 billion to clean (Cont.)up environment. Need $12 billion within next two years. Have requested e xtension of 1977 deadline but don't know if they will get it or not. EXECUTIVE SESSION 6:18 -6:53 p.m. 17 "Section 208" Planning FAH reported that he and Director Wood attended meeting. As of today the re isn't a clear cut answer as far as State is concerned as to what to do . Not sure we have a nother recommendation other than there are several different proposals floating around. Mentioned that one proposal was from SAWPA (and advised that Bob Moore of SAWPA was in the back of the room) which is form an alliance of various agencies in Santa Ana River Basin, leaving out LA area. Mr. Harper said that probably the best thing under the circumstances since we don't have any direction from the State, is possibly for a committee to be· appointed to review some of these matters and report back to the Board on Decewher 10th. Hearing record will be left open until December 15th. Winn said he concurred with that and wanted additional input to come from various agencies. Winn appointed committee to make recommendation at next Board me eting : Donald Saltarelli, Chairman Vernon Evans Robin Yol.lll.g Frances Wood Thomas McKnew Jesse Davis Phillip Cox Asked Chairman Salt a relli to pick a date for me e ting and Mr. Ha rp e r would me et with them on Dec e mber 8th.