Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-11-12..J MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Californ i a JOINT BOARDS Regular Meeting November 12, 1975 -7:30 p.m . Post Office Box 8127 10844 Elli s Avenue Fountain Vall ey, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 7 1 4 540-2910 962-2411 The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are not attac hed to the agenda sinc e they are made up immediately pre- ceding the meeting, but will appear in the supplemental agenda availab l e at the meeting. Joint Board s No. 9-a -Proposal for Design of Surge Tower Extension at Plant No. 2. As previously reported, the staff· has prepared the plans and spec ifications to procure the pumps, right angle gears and the engines for Additional Pumping Facilities for the Ocean Outfall Booster Station at Plant No . 2 . Presently the staff is prepa ring plans and specifications for the installat i on of these three major components of the Additional Pumping Facilities a n d these will be presented to the Boards at the December or January meeting. When these pumping units are completed, it will be nec essary for an extension of the surge tower on the new ocean outfall to be constructed to accommodate the additional pumping heads . During a December storm last year , the effluent in the surge tower was within thr ee feet of overflowing. Because of the necessity to move ahead with the surge tower extension , we request e d an engineer - ing proposal from John Carollo Engineers to prepare the plans a nd specifications and n ece ssary bid documents . Since Carollo designed the ocean outfall and is familiar with the hydraulics associated. th e rewit h , it is recomnended that they be retained in accordance with their proposal of October 21st . The fe e for engineering services as described is $6,500 . This is a budgeted item in the current CORF budget. District No . 2 No. 9-b and 9-c -Award of Contracts Nos. 2-14-3A and 2-14 -4A Th e Directors wi ll recall at the October 1st meeting, we advised that the State Board staff gave us the option of awarding Contracts 2-14-3 and 2-14 -4 on the condition that the project manhole frames and covers were to b e rebid as a separat~ contract . Change Order No. 1 for each of the two contracts (2-14-3 and 2-14-4) were approved which deducted an amount of $3 ,700 and $5 ,1 80, respectively , f r om the two contracts . The act i ons appearing on the agenda approve Resol u tions Nos . 75 -1 48 -2 and 75 -1 49 -2 awarding the contracts to Long Beach Iron Works for these manhole frames and covers in the amounts of $3 ,604 and $5 ,045.60. The staff recommends approval of these two material contracts for the Sarita Ana River I nterceptor Sewer . No . 9-d -Assignment of Contract No. 2-14 -3 Enclosed in the agenda material is a request from John A. Artukovich Sons , Inc., to assign Contract No . 2 -14-3, Santa Ana River Interc ept or, to John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., and John A. Artukovich, Jr ., a joint venture . This assignment gives the contract additional bonding security and the staff recommends approval of this assignment . No. 9-e and 9 -f -Change Orders Nos. 1 and 2 to Contract No . 2 -16-1 Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $23,394 .30 i s for re l ocations and interferences of abandoned irrigation lines, water mains, telephone cables, as well as gasoline and oil lines located in Kraemer Boulevard which were not shown on the plans. Approximately $7,100 of the total Change Order amount will be billed to the respective utility comp a nies. Change Order No . 2 adjusts the engin eers ' quantities to the actual measured unit s of certain street improvements which were made a part of this contract . The City of Placentia will p ay for $1 2,300 of this total adjustment which is in the amount of $15,568 . This project was comp l eted within the original contract time limits as established and no extensions of time are r equ ired. No . 9-g -Completion of Contract No. 2-16-1 The contractor, George Miller Construction Company, has completed the Kraeme r Boulevard Intercep tor Sewer from Palm Drive to Imp erial Highway through the City of Placentia . This pro j ect is a 24 -inch diameter sewer friom Kraemer and Palm Drive to Kraemer and Bastanchury and a 21-inch sewer from that inter- section to the intersection of Kraemer Boulevard and Imperial Highway. This facility is designed to handle 5 .0 mgd and is par t of the Master Plan Trunk Sewer System. The staff recommends acceptance of the work and direction to file the Not i ce of Com - pletion . No . 9-h -Approval of Plans and Specifications for Contract No. 2 -16-2 I n September , 1 974, a cont r act was awarded to construct the Yorba Linda Pump Station which is located on the Ca l ifornia State -2- -. .. University, Fullerton campus, at the intersection of Associated Road and Yorba Linda Boulevard. This project is now nearing com - pletion . The plans and specifications for the connecting force main which will extend from the Pumping Station to the int er- section of Kraemer and Palm Drive are now complete and ready for bid . The engineer's estimate for this project is $803 ,345. We will receive bids for the work on December 16th . With the award of this force main project, the major Master Plan facilities will be completed or under contract to meet the immediate needs of the District with the exception of the Carbon Canyon Dam Sewer . No. 9-i -Report of Development and Annexation of Anaheim Hi l l s Area At the July 9th Board meeting, the Board authorized initiation of proceedings of proposed Annexation No . 12 to the Distric t which is a part of the Anaheim Hills, Inc., development. This annexation was for approximately six acres of territory in the Santa Ana Canyon area . Representatives of Anaheim Hills, Inc., indicated at that time that they would submit a definitive development phasing plan for the Anaheim Hills area . The report, which is included in the agenda material, ·advises that the company wi ll be requesting annexation of approximately 1438 acres during the next five years and contemplates over 7000 living units in this a rea. The District staff has checked the anticipated densities and they arc consiatent ~ith the District's Master flan. No. 9 -j -Staff Report re Acquisition of Rig hts of Way - Santa Ana River Intercept or Sewer. Enc l osed with the agenda is a status report on the Santa Ana River Interceptor right-of-way acquisition through the Canyon area. District No. 3 No. 9-1 and 9-m -Stop Notices re Contract No. 3 -18 and 4). the We have received Stop Notices from a subcontractor on Contract No. 3-18 The actions appearing on the agenda Notices. Districts Nos. 3 and 11 a material supplier (Knott Interceptor, Reach acknowled g e receipt of No. 9-n -Authorizing Solicitation of Engineering Proposals to Prepare Right-of-Way Napping A recent review of the status of the easements for Districts Nos . 3 and 11 reveals discrepancies in the docum ents for the right of way acquired for the trunk sewer system . The staff has attempted over the past four to five years to compile all of the -3- documents and cross reference these with a card index and appro- priate mapping. This is required to facilitate review of changes in right of way for maintenance and/or inquiries of o ther agenc ies regarding their status. The engineer we retained for Dis tr ic t No. 2 found easement records which may require quitclaims and other adjustments to correspond the right of way with our trunk system. It is estimated that this combined effort for Dist ricts Nos. 3 and 11 should not exceed $8,500. Approximately $6 ,5 00 would be borne by District No. 3 and $2.000 by District No. 11. The staff requests authority to solicit proposals and present them at the December Board meeting for consideration. District No. 5 No. 9-o -Increase in Connection Charges for 1976 The current District Ordinance provides that the Board may escalate these charges annually in a specified amount. The Ordinance also requires that if fees are to be increased for the fol low ing year, action must be taken before December 1st of each year. As of November 1, the District's Facilities Revolving Fund in which the connection fees are deposited totals $2 6 0,00 0 . It is recom- mended, because the projected needs of the District outstrip the anticipat ed revenues, that the connection charges be increased from $170 to $175 per dwelling unit and from $8 7 .50/1000 sq . ft., +-o A,90/~ru,...rl C"rt T,....;_ T-.1""\'Vl Y'l.1•' n,-.V"\c~.f-"V1i'l,"""'.;...~r'\Y• _..;....i....,...,~ .;.-~a,,_,,.:;.,,,."""-;';..; NO "" ~ / ..i.. Uv ...,'-:i• -'-v., ..L..v..L J..1.evv vv.1..u . .>v ..L 1...t.\..-'-'..LVJ..l vvJ.J.\....J. 1..1.&..1. .LJ. u.wv-......L..J..4no units. District No. 6 No. 9-p -Claim of Halecrest Park, Inc. The District has received a claim for alleged damages t o a sewer lateral in the amount of $2,918. Apparently, the lateral was damaged during the construction of a force main fa ci lity many years ago which was later sold to the District. Th e action appearing on the agenda deny i ng the claim is recommended by the General Counsel. District No. 7 No. 9-q and 9-r -Closeout of Contract No. 7-6-7 Change Order No. 1 is an adjustment of the engineer's quantities which is a deduction in the contract of $1,192 with an amended contract price of $348,626. Since the contract was completed within the original time limits, no time extensions are required. Resolution No. 75-153-7 accepts this project as complete and a uthori zes filin g of a Notice of Completion and approves a Final Closeout Ag reement with the contractor. This sewer will relieve the presently overloaded sewers in the North Tustin area. The pipe diameters are 21" and 24 11 , capable of handling flows up to 9.64 million gallons per day. -4- No. 9 -s -Appr ov e Pl a n s a n d Specifi cat i ons for Contract No. 7-6-8 Plans and specifi cations for this reach of the Tustin-Orange S ewe r extending from Fairhaven and Esp l anade to Santiago Boulevard and Bond Street in Orange have been prepared in accordance with the Master Plan of Sewers and with the approved Preliminary En g i neering Repo r t dated February, 1974. The estimated cos t of construction i s $587 ,620. It is recommended that the scheduled b i d d ate for thi s contract be established as December 16, 1975. No. 9 -t -Trading Easements re Tract No . 5448 Th e r esolution appear i ng in the agenda autho~izes acceptance of a n e w easement f rom the Tustin Construction Company , Inc ., and ex ecu t i on o f a Qu itclaim Deed to the same firm. This trade of eas eme n ts is to accommodate the r elocation of an existing sewer at no c ost to the District . Distr ict No . 11 No. 9-u -Aw~r d of Contract No. ll-4R Bids we re r eceived f o r i mproving the appearance of the Ne wl a n d -Hamilton Pump Station Facilities in Huntington Beach on October ~0t h. Three bids were receive d with t~~ J ow bio for t he c ombined work required for the District 's facilities and a Southern Ca lifornia Gas Company metering structure being submitted by Clifford L . Thompson Construction Company in the total amount of $1 9 ,821. The Gas Company will reimburs e the District $3 ,000 for the work required on their property . In submitting the low bid, Clifford Thompson neglect e d to sign his proposal . It is recom - mended that the Board waive this irreg ulari ty and accept Schedule A of his bid proposal. The engineer 's estimate for this work is $25 ,000 (budget -$40 ,000). All Districts No . 1 2 -Pur chase of Centrifuge Parts from the Bird Mach ine r y Co mpany . In September, the .Boards authorized the staff to ne gotiate wi th the Bird Machinery Company for the purchase of three sets o f c ent rifuge bowl head skimmers and two sets of rotating elements wh ich are compatible with our existing Bird cent ri fuge s. Enclosed i n the agenda ma t erial is a staff report and r e co~mendat ion as a r esul t of the n egotiations . We recommend the execution of a p ur chase contrac t with the Bird Machinery Company, in form approved b y t he General Counsel, to purchase the rotatin g elements in a c cordance with Option No . 3 of the staff report for a total price of $172 ,260 plu s freight , t axes , and price escalation terms . -5- We further recommend that we be authorized to purchase the three bowl head skimmer conversion kits, a gear unit, and a pair of interchangeable pillow blocks as a separate order totaling $31,087 plus sales tax and freight. The Directors may wish to discuss in more detail the purchase options outlined in the staff report. No. 13 -Procedures for Collection of Delinquent Accounts The two resolutions appearing in the agenda establish the new procedures for the collection of delinquent accounts owed to the Districts and authorizes specifically-named persons to act as agents for the Districts in small claims actions. The General Counsel recommends adoption of the resolutions. No. 14 -Sale of Sludge The Districts have received a satisfactory bid for the dispo sal of our ce ntr ifuged sludge from the Kellogg Supply Company of Harbor City . In view of our past experiences, we recommend that the contract be awarded for a period of one year, with provisions for two, 1-year extensions in accordance with the Kellogg Supply Company bid items Nos. 2 and 3. This firm is well known and respected. Their sewage sludge products e.re !!!E.:!?~eted ~~der t~e r..21!'!.e o f ~!itrQh1-lr::1J.~. 1.'!e beli~~.'"e that this contract will provide us adequate time to develop a long-range disposal plan in conjunction with the 3-year Regional Wastewater Solids Study which is now under way. No. 15 -Staff Report on "208 " Planning Designation for the South Coast Area Enclosed in the agenda material on Page "T" is a copy of a notice of a November 17th public hearing from the State Water Resources Control Board regard ing "Section 208 Planning for the South Coast Area". A separate staff report is enclosed. No. 16 -Annual Audit Report Copies of the annual report for the year ended June 30th have been mailed to all Directors by Peat , Marwick, Mitchell Company, Ce rtified Public Accountants. The action appearing on the agenda is to receive and file the report. If any Director has any questions concerning the report or the auditors' comments, please call Wayne Sylvester, our Director of Finance. No. 17 -Purchase of Parts to Rebuild Gas Engine A large sludge gas engine which drives one of the pumps at Plant No. 2 is in need of a major overhaul. The action appearing on the agenda will permit the staff to take informal bids for the purch ase of the parts necessary to rebuild an engine manu- factured by the Waukesha Motor Company. -6- No. 18 -Proposed Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of Districts' Sewerage Facilities November 12th has been established by the Boards for the second reading of the proposed Industrial Waste Ordinance. The Directors will recall that the staff was directed to contact the State Water Resources Control Board staff for a further clarification of their concerns about the lack of certain pro- visions in the ordinance. Enclosed is a letter marked Agenda Item No. 18 to Mr. Walker of the State Board staff, clarifying the points raised by the State. We are hopeful that we will receive a reply by next Wednesday. No. 19 -Executive Session re Employee Wage and Benefit Negotiations Included in the agenda packet is a confidential report to the Directors on the negotiations to date between management and the representatives of the Orange County Employees Association. There have been eleven meet-and-confer sessions. Two more meet- ings are scheduled prior to the Wednesday Joint Board meeting. It is· not known at this time if a Memorand~m of Understanding can be presented to the Boards for their consideration. If any Director h as any questions or would like to know mor e details, please call Fred Harper. District No . 2 No. 28 -Award of Contract No. 2-14 -5 -Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer Bids were received on the last contract for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer which extends from Gypsum Canyon Road to the Orange County line. The staff was pleased with the interes t shown by the number of contractors who submitted bids which r anged from c low of $2,096,676 to a hi g h of $3 ,517,989. The low bid was submitted by S. S. Zarubica Company which was 16 % under the engineer's estimate of $2,483 ,167. The action appearing on th e agenda approves Resolution No . 75-158 -2, awarding the contract to S . S . Zarubica Comp any in the amount of $2,096,676.15 upon r ece ipt of the re q uired approvals from th e State Water Resources Control Board. Dis"'crict No. 5 No. 34 -Approving the County of Oran e as Member Agency of the Newport-Irvin e Waste Management Planning Agency NIWA The Board of Directors of NIWA me t November 5th to consider the proposal of the County Supervisors for participation b:: the County of Orange as a member agency . Essentially, the conditions -7-:- I ' set forth by the Supervisors provided that the County would assume the lead responsibility for the Joint Powers Agency and that NIWA should include the County, the Cities of Newport Beach and Irvine, and any other watershed city wishing to join, Irvine Ranch Water District , County Sanitation District No. 5, Orange County Water District, and the Department of Fish and Game. The Board of Directors of NIWA determined that the con- ditions set forth by the County for membership were acceptable. It is, therefore, recommended that Resolution No. 75-159-5, approving inclusion of Orange County as an additional member agency of NIWA subject to the conditions of the Board of Supervisors' Resolution No. 75-1431 is recommended. If approval is given by all member agencies, a revision in the ·Joint Powers Agreement will be required. Included for District No. 5 Directors are copies of a draft amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement dated October 31, 1975, which was submitted by the County. District No. 3 No. 37 -Report of General Counsel Regarding City of Los Alamitos Fees in Connection with Contract No. 3 -21-1 T11t:: Ger1e.r:~l Cu:...:.11tJel 11\.:i.~ 1Jeer1 r1eg otlal,lr1g t11 e seLrLlenler~L uf the claim of the City of Los Alamitos of $5,640 for engineering and inspection fees claimed to be due the City in connection with the construction of the Westside Relief Interceptor, Contract No. 3-21-1. A brief report is included in the agenda material recomme nding payment to the City in the amount of $4 ,000. Fred A. Harper General Manager .. !I ,, I II re ... ~ FILE ···~·--l ...... .. LmER ....•••••..••• A/C .••. TKLR •••• LOAi .. t>S '°"' ;c ui~~ECYOL.S County San ita ti on Districts of Orange County, Californi~ JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE NOVE~BER 12J 1975 -7:30 P.M. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call f'o~t Office box 81:- 10844 El I 1s Avenu• Fountain Valley, Calif., 9270E Teiephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA ADJOUR:::.:r::ffS POSTED - Co ''P" ,. :··· -. .-~ 1.1 ...._. L .. • _' 1· [." ............ . F:l :::::; ~' : : I) v fL. : . : .. ; (:· :~. :rn.D .. f" l[l1c ... : • ... ·: ... ~ .... r.rn~~ i ~;:; '.. ·,: .. ii .. 7 .. ~ MINUTES 1-ILED ................. . (3) (4) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary 1i-l --~ (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any. See supplemental agenda ... 0~ EACH DISTRICT ---·-············--Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 -October October District 2 October October District 3 -October October District 5 -October October District 6 -October October District 7 -October October District 11 -October October (6) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel 1, 1975 regular and 29, 1975 adjourned 1, 1975 regular and-a.A~ 29, 1975 adjourned I, 1975 regular and 29, 1975 adjourned 1, 1975 regular and 29, 19 75 adjourned 1, 1975 regular and 29, 1975 adjourned 1, 1975 regular and 29, 1975 adjourned 1, 1975 regular and 29, 1975 adjourned ( 7) ALL DI STRICTS Con sideration of mo tion t o r ece ive and file c ertifica tion of th e General Manager that he h as checked all bills ap pearing on th e agenda, found them to be in order , and that he recommends autho ri zation for payment (8) ALL DISTRICTS (8) ROLL CALL \'OTE •. _.,.- l TC!.13 m~ SUPPlEM ~NT AL AG!:NDA Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund accotmts. payable check registers for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing payment of claims listed on page "I" ; and approving accotmts payable check registers for signature of the Chairman of the respective District, and authorizing payment of said claims listed on the pages indicated below: DISTRICT 1 M!:1"'l"Mt3 1 if imy. • • • . . . • . . • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • NONE DISTRICT 2 warrants -See page "II" DISTRICT 3 warrants -See page "II" BISTRICTG 3 & 11 s~pense ftmd warrtl:fl:ts, if any •.•.•••. NONE DISTRICT 5 warrants, if B:Rf •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• NONE DISTRICTS 5 & 6 suspense ftmd warrants -See page "II" DISTRICT 6 warr81\ts, if eny .....•.....•••.•.•.•...••• ~. NONE DISTRICT 7 warrants -See page ------, "III" DISTRICT 11 W6:l"l"8:ftt3, if eny.. . • . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . • • . • NONE (9) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT ·CALENDAR FILE······- 1.ffiER ···-··- A/C .... TIClR ·- Roll Call Vote or Cast Un animo us Ballot • ITEMS NOS I 9 (A) THROUGH 9 ( u ) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a tmanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar . All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, stat e their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. (a..) ( € ) (~ ) Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifi cally r e moved from same. -2- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) -~~ A/C •••• TKLR .... :,/ FILE --···-·----·~ ,\./ ~~-~~-----' "-v. A/C ___ TIClR -- FILE .~ ••••• .i..·-··-· LETTER !~-~~ . ..};/'" A/C •.•• TKLR _ ······---·-···-··-.. - FILE rtQ~ ~.;rn:h. i\; .. · ,.' , . ., ·--~ ···---··- A/C •••• TKLR -- ~ .. L~L.·~._l$£1 ~­ :....... FllE ••• ---- lEntR-- A/C •••• TKLR - ···············- ···············-······- FILE··-··- LETTER.- A/C ••.. TKLR - FILE ···-··--··-.-/ f~ \I ,.,, \~-~------ A/C .... ~­-~-~:.~ .. ~.-~ .. :::£ ~ _______ ......,_ ALL DISTRICTS C--c;}J Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal ~ of John Carollo Engineers, dated October 21, 1975, for engineering services in connection with design of Surge Tower Extension at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-9-2, for a lump sum fee of $6,500. See page "A" .DISTRICT 2 (b) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 75-148-2, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer (From Grove Street to Imperial Highway) Manhole Covers and Frames, Contract No. 2-14-3A, to Long Beach Iron Works, Inc. in the amount of $3,604.00. See page "B" (c) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 75-149-2, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer (From Imperial Highway to Gypsum Canyon Road) Manhole Covers and Frames, to Long Beach Iron Works, Inc. in the am01.m.t of $5, 045. 60. See page "C" (d) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., dated October 21, 1975, requesting assignment of Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer (in La Palma Avenue from Grove Street to Imperial Highway) and South Santa Ana River Interceptor Connector (in Imperial Highway, from 300' South of Santa Ana Canyon Road to LaPalma Avenue) Reaches 2, 3 & 4, Contract No. 2-14-3, to John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. and John A. Artukovich, Jr., a Joint Venture, and approving said assignment in a form acceptable to the General Cotms el. See page "D" tfe)}consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the ~ plans and specifications for Kraemer Boulevard Interceptor Sewer, From Palm Drive to Imperial Highway, Contract No. 2-16-1, authorizing an addition of $23,394.30 to the contract with George Miller Construction Company, for additional work due to undisclosed utilities. See page "En (f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Kraemer Boulevard Interceptor Sewer, From Palm Drive to Imperial Highway, Contract No. 2-16-1, authorizing an addition of $15,568.00 to the contract with George Miller Construction Company, due to an adjustment of engineer's quantities. See page "F" (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-150-2, accepting Kraemer Boulevard Interceptor Sewer, From Palm Drive to Imperial Highway, Contract No. 2-16-1, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "G" (h) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 75-151-2, approving plans and specifications for Yorba Linda Boulevard Force Main, Contract No. 2-16-2, and authorizing advertising for bids on December 16, 1975 (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (9) (CO~<::~~;·;· C' \JD~DAR cc•ntinued from p~ge 3) I t:TTER ···-··-··- ~·c .... TKLll •••• ----··-······-· 0.. ~i~ / FllE -~---- LETTER ••• - A/C •••. TKLR - ···-··---··-··---- /~;~-!/ '~-'~---·:-..... LETTER ···········- A/C •••• TKLR ··- FI LE •• ~.'.°:!.:~·-···· LETTER ·--··-··- A/C •••• TKLR •••• FILE --~---~· •• }:._ LETTER ···---···- A/C •••• TKLR •••• ' . ',~ ... ,v' \,FILE ················~:·\ . 1.t'i-\..V' LETTER --~·······- A/C .... TKLR ·-· ···········-··········- .................. --- f,LE ················- ·. . L_ETTER -~--=:­ A/C •.•• TKLR --· FlLE •.•• ~.:..­·--.v . LEnER ···--! .. - A/C •••. Tl<L• ··- .................. ~ LmER ·······-···- A/C .... TKLR ·-· -··-··-··------ DI~~: !C1 2 (Continued) (i) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Anaheim Hills, Inc., dated September 30, 1975, relative to their overall development plans for Anaheim Hills in connection with forthcoming annexations to the District See page "H" ~Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report ~on acquisition of rights of way for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Contracts Nos. 2-14-4 and 2-14-5. (mailed with agenda material) DISTRICT 3 (k) Consideration of motion to receive and file interim staff report on odor control problems relative to operation of the Knott Interceptor in the City of Fountain Valley. See page "!" (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Hydro Conduit Corporation in the amount of $168,284.45, against A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Co., a Joint Venture, contractor for the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18 (m) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by C. D. Barlow dba Pioneer Jacking Company in the amount of $24,566.85, against A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Co., a Joint Venture, contractor for the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18 DISTRICTS 3 & 11 (n) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit engineering proposals for preparation of right-of-way document maps and records for the respective Districts DISTRICT 5 (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-152-5, authorizing the increase of connection charges established by Ordinance No. 507, effective January 1, 1976. See page "J" DISTRICT 6 (p) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Halecrest Park, Inc., dated October 1, 1975, in the amount of $2,918.00, for alleged damage to sewer lateral, and refer to the District's liability insurance carrier for appropriate action, as recommended by the General Counsel DISTRICT 7 (q) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 11 and a Portion of Reach 12, Contract No. 7-6-7, approving a deduction of $1,192.00 from the contract with Rogers & Davies, due to an adjustment of engineer's quantities. See page "K" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 7 (continued) fl LE ••.•.•..•••••••••• ;{··;;;-:::-~ ~v.·-···- A/C •••• TKLR _ ..... } ·~ . ' .. ~~ .. r.·~ (~ ..... ~ ... .. ~R .~:::t.:. .. . , "-· ,._, A/C •••• TJClR -- ~ . , '-) ¥"' -.l..~-;:;····:--y-. \' r,i;.J I ( F~~.:;~··--7 \JE!E.R .... ~-­ A/C •••. TKLR - ····---··-··-·----- --- (r) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-153-7, accepting Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 11 and a Portion of Reach 12, Contract No. 7-6-7, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "L" (s) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 75-154-7, approving plans and specifications for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 12, Reach 13 and Portion of Reach 14, Contract No. 7-6-8, and authorizing advertising for bids on December 16, 1975 (t) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-155-7, accepting Grant of Easement from Tustin Construction Co., Inc. re Tract No. 5448, and authorizing execution of Quitclaim Deed to Tustin Construction Co., Inc. for portion of similiar easement in consideration therefor See page "M" DISTRICT 11 (u) Consideration of motion wa1v1ng irregularity on bid of Clifford L. Thompson Construction Company (bidder failed to sign bid document); and approving Standard Resolution No. 75-156-11, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract to Remodel Newland-Hamilton Pumping Station Facilities, Contract No. ll-4R, to Clifford L. Thompson Construction Company, in the amount of $19,821.00. See page "N" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -5- (11) ~,~ (12) ~ . , fllE J.:t..~:.- t.ETT!R ···-··-··-· ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's \ffitten report ALL DISTRICTS (a) we .... TKtR •••• fr\\$ Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report and recommendation regarding acquisition of Three Sets of Centrifuge Bowl-Head Skimmers and Two Sets of Rotating Elements, Specification No. E-077. See page "0" ---------- .. @ ~- Consideration of Resolution No. 75-157, authorizing execution of purchase contract with Bird Machine Company for three sets of centrifuge bowl-head skimmers and appurtenances, in the amount of $31,087 plus tax and freight, and two sets of rotating elements, in the amount of $172,260 plus tax and freight, in form approved by the General Counsel. See page "P" I.ETTER ....... ~.?" Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot A/C •••• TKLR •••• W $ w~~.:>-~:.:.~ "'~ tv\.t --¥,,_ (13) ALL DISTRICTS 9-~---Y' Ml> (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-145, establishing procedures LETTER ...••• R.oJLCall Vote or Cast for the collection of delinquent obligations owing to the Districts. A.IC .•.• TKLR -~animous Ballot See page "Q" ti\\> (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-146, appointing representatives for the Districts to act as agents on their behalf in the Small Claims Court of the West Orange County Judicial District. See Roll Call Vote or Cast FILE ···········-·unanimous Ballot LETTER ·······-·- A/C .... TKLR ··- ·--··-······-·-( 14) -·-·-···-- FILE ···············- LETTER ···-········· A/C •••• TKLR •••• 't-1 .. (l .~.' I "" -'2-.: _______ _ page "R" ALL DISTRICTS ~Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report and recommendation on Sale of Digested Sewage Sludge, Specification No. S-016. See page "S" ~ ~ c\.. )\.c).....:._Q (b) onsideratio i.--t:r:i:--fl.40:~ Roll Call Vote or Cast -····-··-··1:hmJimous Ballot ag Sludge, "T" FILEP .•. J.t.._ ~ALL DISTRICTS LETTER·······--~ Staff report and discussion regarding "Section 208" planning for the we .... TKLR ··-Southern California area (area-wide planning pursuant to the provisions --··-··-·····-···-of the 1972 Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act) .0 "n _. /\O ... ;...,,. See page "U" (also see report enclosed with agenda material) r~ ~ ~. ,~ ~.;. (16) FILE ···-······-----...-<"--. '· ' lErrER •• ~ •• .:.:..... V --_..,.,- A/C .... TKLR ""1<\ \ s ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file Annual Report submitted by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., Certified Public Accountants, for the year ending June 30, 1975, previously mailed to Directors by auditors ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion waiving formal bidding provisions of Purchasing Resolution No. 74-98, and authorizing the General Manager to issue a purchase order to the lowest bidder for Parts to Rebuild Engine No. 10 at Plant No. 2 (PW-048) in an amount not to exceed $9,000 plus tax and freight -6- (IS) ALL D~ST~ICTS Second reading on Proposed Ordinance Establi~hing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities (Copy enclosed with agenda material) (a) Consideration of motion to read the following ordinances, by title only, and waiving reading of said ordinances in their entirety (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present in each District): N\ \S DISTRICT 1 -Ordinance No. 103, an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities .... ...., /,/ \,~~.:---·-··- \.ETTER •••••••.••. - >JC ••• :~Ul -~l.s It\}') "'' 5> rv\l.r ('1\)5 ~ls @) (c) ROLL CALL VOTE ......... -..i d) ROLL CALL VOTE .••• ~- ROLL CALL VOTE .......... - ROLL CALL VOTE ......... -- ROLL CALL \'DTE ···-··-...- ROLL CALL VOTE .••••••••• - ;, ---CALL VOTE .. .._ DISTRICT 2 -Ordinance No. 204, an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities DISTRICT 3 -Ordinance No. 305, an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities DISTRICT 5 -Ordinance No. 508, an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities DISTRICT 6 -Ordinance No. 603, an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities DISTRICT 7 -Ordinance No. 716, an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities DISTRICT 11 -Ordinance No. 1103, an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities Staff report Discussion DISTRICT 1 DISTRICT 2 DISTRICT 3 DISTRICT 5 DISTRICT 6 DISTRICT 7 -Consideration of roll call vote adopting Ordinance No. 103, an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities -Consideration of roll call vote adopting Ordinance No. 204, an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities -Consideration of roll call vote adopting Ordinance No. 305, an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities -Consideration of roll call vote adopting Ordinance No. SOB, an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities -Consideration of roll call vote adopting Ordinance No. 603, an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities -Consideration of roll call vote adopting Ordinance No. 716, an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities DISTRICT 11 -Consideration of roll call vote adopting Ordinance No. 1103, an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities -7- (19) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to convene in executive session re employer and employee wage and benefit negotiations q :~ O -to~ e<:) (20) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to reconvene in regular session (21) ALL DISTRICTS (22) (23) (24) (25) (26) (27) (28) · Roll.~ Vote or Cast <f.IL.~--'ijfiinir11(lt!S Ballot ...... )t .. v...W1./ ~tmE~.-·-~"·········- A/C •••. TICLR ··- -··--··-··-·--( 29) Other business and commt.mications or supplemental agenda items, if any DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn 'o ~ o "2 tal agenda items, if any DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn \o·.o'2. ntal agenda items, if any DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjoum10·.0'"2,. DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 75-158-2, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer (Gypsum Canyon Road to Orange Col.lllty Line), Reaches 6, 7 & B, Contract No. 2-14-5, to S. S. Zarubica, in the amot.mt of $2,096,676.15. See page "V" (30) DISTRICT 2 ·, .. ·.:v fR.E " ' (31) lETI'ER ·---··- " v" A/C ~-~~R .. M. \.S -··-·---··-··-··---(32) Consideration of motion to adjourn 1D~b~ DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from City of Costa Mesa, dated October 27, 1975, requesting waiver of connection fees, and refer to staff for study and report back to the Board. See page "W" items, if any (33) DISTRICT 7 (34) ~all Vote or Cast ~animous Ballot FILE: --• /Yl/) LETTER -r A/C •••• TIClR - --····---..M Consideration of motion to adjourn >O·.Q.3 DISTRICT 5 Consideration of Resolution No. 75-159-5, approving inclusion of the Board of Supervisors of Orange Cotmty as an additional member agency of the Newport-Irvine Waste Management Planning Agency, in accordance with the conditions set forth in the Board of Supervisors' Resolution No. 75-1431. See pages "X" "Y" , and "Z" -8- (35) agenda items, if any (36) DISTRICT 5 (37) f11.E :20:~-- LETT£R ............ - l>JC ••.. ll(\.I ··•· #.:..'?..: .. ~ --·-··" ..... (38) (39) Consideration of motion to adjourn 10:. 0 3 DISTRICT 3 (a) Report of the General Col.lllsel regarding payment to the City of Los Alamitos for engineering and inspection fees in connection with construction of the Westside Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 and Portion of 27, Contract No. 3-21-1. See page "AA" (b) Consideration of motion authorizing payment to the City of Los Alamitos in the amount of $4,000 for engineering and inspection fees in connection with construction of the Westside Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 and Portion of 27, Contract No. 3-21-1, as recommended by the General Cotmsel al agenda items, if any DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn ,c ~o.5 -9- • I II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS NOVEMBER 12~ 1975 -7:30 P.M. ALL DISTRICTS Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA (8) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund accounts payable check registers for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing par-ent of clail!'.s listed on page "!" ; a!ld approvi!lg account5 payable check regis~ers for signa~ure oi ~ne Chair-m~1 oi ~h~ respective District, and authorizing payment of said claims listed on the pages indicated below: BIS'fRICT 1 ,,·erl."aHts, if any ......................•..••. NONE DISTRICT 2 warrants -See page "II" DISTRICT 3 warrants -See page "II" BIS'fRICTS 3 & 11 ~ttspen~e ftmd warre"ts, if any ....•... NONE DISTRICT S wantmts, if eH~'. • . • . • . • • • • • • • • • • . • . • . . • • • . . NONE DISTRICTS 5 & 6 suspense fund warrants -See page "II" fHSTRI CT 6 ·war"raftts, if eHy. . . • . . • . • . . . • • • . . • • • • • • • • . . • NONE DISTRICT 7 warrants -See page ___ '_'I_I_I_" __ _ ·DISTRICT 11 war:r·eftts, if aft)' •••••.••••••••••••••••••••• NONE • WARRANT NO. 27420 27421 27422 27423 27424 27425 27426 27427 2742 8 274 29 27430 27431 27432 27433 27434 27435 27436 27437 27438 27439 27440 27441 27442 27443 27444 27445 27446 27447 27448 2744 9 27450 27451 27452 27453 27454 27455 27456 27457 27458 27459 27460 274bl 27462 27l.J63 27l.J64 27l.J65 27l.J66 27467 274b8 27469 27471 27472 27473 "1-1" JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF ABC Metals Supply, Inc., Brass $ Admiral Corporation, Refrigerators & Equip. Repair Aerial Map Industries, Printing Air California, Air Fare, Various Meetings All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings, V-Belts & Bushings Allied Supply Company, Valves Alpine Aromatics, Inc., Odor Control American Chemical Society, Technical Journal American Cyanamid Company, Test Materials Amoco Reinforced Plastics Co., Pipe City of Anaheim, Power Anaheim Sewer Construction, Lateral Repair The Anchor Packin g CQ., Inc., Pump Packing Andrews Hardware & Metal Co., Hardware & Tools Applied Science Labs., Inc., Lab Supplies Artesia Implements & Parts Co., Equipment Parts Ralph W. Atkinson Company, Barscreen Parts Bank of America, Coupon Collection Banning Battery Co mpany, Batteries Barnes & Delaney, Barscreen Parts Beach City Dodge, Truck Parts Beckman Instruments, Controls John G. Bell Co., Barscreen Parts Bell Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supplies Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair Benz Engineering, Inc., Compressor Parts Bird Machine, Freight Blue Diamond Materj_Rls : Paving MRte~iAls Bomar Magneto Service, Inc. Magneto Repair Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams C & R Reconditioning Company, Compressor Repair CS Comp any, Seals, Valves & Pump Parts Cal-Glass for Research, Inc., Lab Supplies Cal State Seal Company, Gaskets Cal's Cameras, Photo Processing & Supplies California Auto Refinishers , Hardware California Association of Sanitat i on Agencies, Insurance Study Art Carr Trans mi ss i on , .Truck Repa i r Case Power & Equipment, Equipment Parts Certified Laboratories, Cleaner Brian Chuchua.'s Four Wheel Jeep, Truck Parts Clark Equipment Company, Equipment Parts Clyde's Repair Shop, Truck & Tractor Repair Coast Nut & Bolt, Barscreen Parts & Hardware Coast Roof Company, Roof Repair College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials Commercial & CB Communications, Communica t ion Equipment Congressional Staff Directory, Government Manual Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electric Supplies Consolidated Bolt & Nut Co., Freight F. B.·Cook Corp., Station Repair Leelon L. Cory, Employee Mileage Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts AGENDA ITEM #8 AMOUNT 35.91 43 9 .28 35 .4 6 502.65 406. 47 164.89 1, 060 . 0() 30 . 00 6 964.27 323.30 13 .67 225.0 0 188.79 536.14 55.45 206.86 89 .86 79.60 519.25 68 9 .00 80.25 1,317.83 371.97 92·.64 330.40 334.51 11.35 102.82 208.65 13.00. 505.00 269.61 325.50 23.98 169.36 131.33 1,050.00 398.08 51 .62 122.78 140.67 25.51 600.61 196.23 187.00 48.91 152.64 24.50 2, 736.41 44.42 200.00 7.50 271.38 "I-1" · WARMN'I 1 NO. 27474 27475 27476 0 7477 ,.,_.'4 78 27479 27480 27481 27482 27483 27484 27485 27486 27487 27488 27489 27490 27491 27492 27493 27494 27495 27496 27497 27498 27499 27500 27501 27502 27?03 27504 27505 27506 27507 27508 27509 27510 27511 27512 27513 27514 27515 27516 27517 27518 27519 27520 27521 27522 27523 27524 27525 27527 "1-2" IN FAVOR OF Costa Mesa County Water District, Water Crest Leasing, Vehicle Lease Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab 'Supplies Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Lab Supplies Daily Pilot, Bid Notice S-016 Data Supplies & Systems, Inc., Printing Economy Crane Rental Service, Crane Rental c. R. Davis Supply Co., Hose & V-Belts Derby's Topsoil, Building Materials Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling AMOUNT 6.oo 147.28 40.00 11.70 376.02 8.79 l,026.J7 357.00 209.37 74.20 Diamond-Newport Ice Co., Industrial Waste Sampling Supplies Diana Distributors, Cleaner 685. 00 15.90 246.72 34. 74 46.81 Nick Di Benedetto, Employee Mileage Dollinger Corp., Freight Dominguez Marine & Industrial, Pipe Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Eco Air Products, Filters Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Services Essick Machinery Co., Compressors Esterline Angus, Recorder Filter Supply Co., Pump Parts Fischer & Porter Company, Valves, Pump Parts & Meter Repair Fisher Controls.Company, Regulator Parts Fontainebleau Hotel, WPCF Conference Expense City of Fountain Valley, Plant.Water France Products Division, Compressor Repair Edward R. Francis, Pl-16 Engine Testing Freeway Machine and Weldin~ Shop_~ Machinin~ Frost Engineering Service Co., Pump Parts City of Fullerton, District Water GAF Corporation, Blueprint Machine Repair Garden Grove Lumber & Cement Co., Building Materials Gardner Denver Co., Pump Parts Garrett Industrial Supply Co., Tools Gemini Batteries, Batteries General Binding Corp., Maintenance Agreement General Electric Supply, Electric Supplies General Pump Service, Inc., Pump Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine General Telephone Company of America Goldenwest Fertilizer Co., Grit Removal M. E. Gray Company, Valves & Pipe Supplies Graybar Electric Co., Electric Supplies Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Parts L. C. Gysin, Employee Mileage Harrisons & Crosfield, Coagulants Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal Hennig, Inc., Truck Repair ·Hercules Incorporated, Test Materials Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease Hewlett Packard, Equipment Maintenance Hoffman's Nason Paint Store, Paint Supplies AGENDA ITEM i,l8 365.13 592.06 154.58 3,000.00 360.61 331. 77 26.43 3,785.46 116.76 313.12 40.00 231.87 767.70 817.28 126.95 5.82 58.oo 267.27 310.95 68.90 299.77 151.74 930.57 2,806.88 12,670.40 4,156.74 1,890.00 133.61 852.68 20.16 8.70 13,088.88 140.00 90.70 7,739.00 1,515.61 82.68 126.78 "l-2" WARRANT NO. 27528 27529 27530 27531 27532 27533 27534 27535 27536 27537 27538 27539 27540 27541 27542 27543 27544 27545 27546 27547 27548 27549 27550 27551 27552 27553 27554 27555 27556 27~C::..7 27558 27559 27560 27561 27562 27563 27564 27565 27566 27567 27568 27569 27570 27571 27572 27573 27574 27575 27576 27577 27578 27579 27580 27581 27582 27583 275~4 27585 "1-3" IN FAVOR OF Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires Honeywell, Inc., Metering Supplies House of Batteries, Batteries Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies, Rope & Tools Hundley Company, Inc., Controls City of Huntington Beach, Distrtct & Plant Water Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Equipment Rental I-C Electronis, Electric Supplies Ingersol-Rand, Compressor Parts & Tool Repair Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware Instrumentation Specialities, Test Equipment International Business Mach.ine, Office Supplies International Harvester Co., Truck Parts Irvine Ranch Water District, Water Jensen Instrument Company, Switches Johnston Pump Co., Pump Parts Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies & Valve Keen-Kut Abrasive Co., Hardware Kelly Pipe Company, Pipe Supplies King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, Bushings & Conveyor Parts Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts Kisling Construction Co., Raise Manholes & Sewer Repair Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware, Tools & Chain L.A. Water Treatment, Valve Parts LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tools, Hardware & Valves L & N Uniforms Supply Company, Uniform Service Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Sweeper & Truck Parts Larry's Bldg. Materials, Inc., Building Materials Judy Lee, Ernployee Mileage Lewco 'Fi~lectri.c Company~ Truck RepA.ir Lewis Brothers Battery, Batteries Los Angeles Times, Industrial Waste Notice McKinley Equipment Corp., Operating Supplies Master Blueprint & Supply, Drafting Supplies & Printing Mayday Tool & Supply Company, Tools & Rope Mobil Oil Corporation, Grease Moore Systems, Inc., Controls Morgan Equipment Company, Equipment Parts Mortarless Block, Inc., Building Materials Motorola, Inc., Batteries N B Products, Pipe Supplies Nalco Chemica..L Company, Chemicals National Chemsearch, Cleaner National Lumber Supply, Building Materials & Hardware Nelson-Dunn, Inc., Pump Parts City of Newport Beach, Plant & District Water Nolex Corp., Reproduction Paper M. C. Nottingham Co., Inc., Lateral Repair Occidental College, Trawl Charter Ole's Home Center, Anti-Freeze ·city of Orange, Water Orange County Chemical Co., Ammonia Orange County Equipment Co., Equipment Parts Orange County Farm Supply Co., Landscape Supplies Orange County Hose Co., Tubing Orange County Steel, Scrap Sale Refund Oreo Block Co., Inc., Building Materials Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies AGENDA ITEM #8 .. "' AMOUNT 1,164.50 83.08 129.15 3,448.55 132.r)o ~ l~R.~2 76.32 3 .89 864.62 192.19 329.14 32.89 36.52 3.50 79.48 246.98 2,239.20 114.93 22.22 2,133.89 2,705.30 4,695.00 332.67 ·123.12 1,033.01 3,723.88 301.05 79.39 46.17 28. 38 86.81 160.72 252.81 228. 96 329.10 52.31 150.26 24.59 8~.68 203.52 1,01~.97 1~982.68 1,241.79 136.54 16.55 316.88 743.78 105.00 400.00 220.69 54.29 31.80 64.46 58.51 12. 24._., 2,042.79 17.81 482.20 "1-3" WARRANT'' NO. 27586 27587 27588 27589 ~7590 ~7591 27592 27593 27594 27595 27596 27597 27598 27599 27600 27601 27602 27603 27604 27605 27606 27607 27608 27609 27610 27611 27612 27613 27614 27615 27616 27617 27618 27619 27620 27621 27622 27623 27624 27625 27620 27627 27628 27629 27630 27631 27632 27633 27634 27635 27636 27637 27638 539 ~640 27641 27642 "1-4" IN FAVOR OF Pacific Telephone Company Pako Corporation, Equipment Maintenance MC Patten Corporati.on, Compressor Parts & Gauges Pent, Mnrwick, Mitchell & Co., EDP Consultant Jose Pena, Weed Abatement Perkin-Elmer, Lab Supplies & Equipment Repair Pickwick Paper Prodllcts, Jan j_ tori.al Supplies Printec Corporatlon, Reproduction Supplies Production Pallet Company, Inc., Pallets The Pryor Giggey Co., Building Materials RFL, Inc., Filters Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal Red Valve Company, Inc., Valves The Register, Bid Notices S-014 & 11-4-R & Industrial Waste Notice Rhodia Company, Odor Control Richey Electronics, Inc., Electric Supplies Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motor Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies Science Essentials Supplies, Sampling Supplies Science Products, Lab Supplies City of Seal Beach, District Water Seal Black Co., Inc., Paving Materials Sensorex, Inc., Test Equipment S. F. Serrantino, Employee Mileage Sesco, Building Materials Shepherd Machinery Co., Equipment Parts Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies John Sigler, Employee Mileage Smith Emery Co., Pipe Inspection Southern California Edison Company South Orange Supply, Piping Supplies Southern California Gas Company Southern California Water Company Southern Distributors Corp., Building Materials Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp. Bottled Water Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Oil Company of Calif., Oil Diesel Fuel & Gasoline Star-Lite Barricade, Barricade Rental Starow Steel, Steel Sterling Art & Engineering~ Drafting Supplies Sterling Power Systems, Inc., Pump Parts Sun Electric Corporation, Tools Sunnen Products Co., Maintenance Supplies The Suppliers, Tools J. Wayne Sylvester, .Director of Finance, Petty Cash Reimb. T-Girl Temporary Employment, Temporary Warehouse Help T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Equip. Parts & Tractor Rental Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage Taylor-Dunn, Electric Supplies & Equipment Parts ~ektronix, Inc., Equipment Parts C. o. Thompson Petroleum Co., Kerosene Tony's Lock & Safe Service, Lock Repair Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts Two Guys, Photo Equipment Union Oil Company of California, Gasoline United Auto Parts, Truck Parts United Parcel Service, Freight-out AGENDA ITEM #8 AMOUNT 5011. 23 86.23 6811. 21 l1g5. 00 ");),). 00 8~4.24 p, 11. 20 387. 54 P.111. 08 688. 47 4 .=s6. 4 3 130.08 403.17 400.25 2,127.50 128.18 80.35 867.41 74.99 93.58 46.06 5e.30 59.36 38.82 173.84 401.32 746.52 12.90 104.oo 52,349.55 612.15 711.15 4.67 45. 79 142.25 551.67 6,510.68 41.00 243.58 132.99 38.87 66.14 107.27 535.59 687.67 645.01 858.92 139.02 122.48 48.64 100.64 4.51 772.04 15.89 180.63 li.t6.25 63'. 51 "1-4" WARRANT NO. 27643 27644 27645 27646 27647 27648 27649 27650 27651 27652 27653 27654 27655 27656 27657 27658 276?9 27660 27661 27662 27663 27664 27665 27666 27667 27668 27669 27670 27671 ')'7~7~ L-IVl'- 27673 II I -5" IN FAVOR OF United Reprographics, Inc., Printlng Unlted States Elevator Corp., MaintenAnce Agreement United States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts University of CaliforniR Extension, Training Utilities Supply Company, Tools Vaniman Camera, Photo Processing & Supplies Van Waters & Rogers, Chemicals VRW Scientific, Lab Supplies Varec, Inc., Freight Video Pipe Grouting, Inc., Pipe Inspection Paul Vukich, Employee Mileage Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage John R. Waples, R.S., Odor Consultant Warren and Bailey Co., Inc., Hardware Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts Western Salt Company, Salt Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Supplies Wilshire Chemical Co., Lab Supplies Wilson Ford Sales, Truck Parts Wilson Paper Company, Aluminum Foil Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel World Travel Bureau, Inc., Air Fare, Various Meetings Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Services Everett H. York Company, Filters F. T. Ziebarth Company, Bypass Relocation Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electric Supplies ;::~:~~,...E:::+ ... ~::c Supply, ~lect~ic Supplies .i.uov.i. u.mcn1.1a.1..1.Lou Specialities, ·r·es1:; f;quipmen-c John M. Wright, Employee Mileage TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AGENDA ITEM #8 , AMOUNT 20.00 27.00 88.51 6li .. ')O 63.04 ~ 107.79 5' 1131. 41 3115. 44 22 .42 250.00 9.75 31.50 549.10 20.35 1,939.27 108.26 1,027.77 454.47 9.02 38.27 4 '741.00 1,102.56 45.18 6,870.01 2,061.56 270.08 8,522.00 168.77 ".)sh ,s ..) -v ...... ~'-'' r-r .)UV.:J:J 22.50 $ 232,981.85 "l-5" WARRANT NO. 27370 ·371 ~372 27373 27374 27375 27376 27377 27378 27379 27380 27381 27382 27383 27384 27385 27386 273e7 27388 27389 27390 27391 27392 27393 27394 27395 27396 27397 27398 27399 27400 27401 27402 27403 27404 27405 27406 27407 27408 27409 27410 27411 27412 27413 27Lt14 27415 27416 27417 27418 27419 "I-6" CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Artesia Implements & Parts Co., Tractor A-078 & Tools$ Ruth Bailey, Public Info. Workshop Leader Belmont Engineering, JPL Tanks & Clarifiers Janet Bloch, Public Info. Workshop Leader John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Services, ACTS, Fae. Plan Cheesman's Bench Rack Co., Cabinets Cleveland Mixer Corp., JPL Mixers Jane Cook, Public Info. Workshop Leader Jean Dahlmont, Public Info. Workshop Leader Daily Pilot, JPL Workshop Notice Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16 Jacqueline Dvorman, Public Info. Workshop Leader Enviro Development Co., Inc., JPL Filter Karen Everts, Public Info. Workshop Leader Ruth Finley, Public Info. Workshop Leader Forkert Engineering, Engineering P2-8-3 J. B. Gilbert & Associates, EIS Facilities Plan Grieve Corp., Electric Supplies J. Putnam Henck, Contractor, JPL-ACTS Hipotronics, Tester Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Management Pl-16 Hoffman & Heartt, Drill Press Karen Kallay, Public Info. Workshop Leader Pat Kenwrothy, Public Info. Workshop Leader Dorothy King, Public Info. Workshop Leader LBWS, Inc., Welding Torch L.A. Opinion, JPL Workshop Notice Judy Medler, Public Info. Workshop Leader Merle Moshiri, Public Info. Workshop Leader Motorola, Inc., Corrununication Equipment NASA-Pasadena Office, JPL Training &.Services Jane Oseid, Public Info. Workshop Leader Fern Prikle, Public Info. Workshop Leader Production Systems, Inc., Electric Equipment The Register, Workshop Insertion, Notice PW-046 Scholl & Co. Advertising, Public EIS Workshop Lola Seymour_, Public Info. Workshop Leader Smith Emery Company, Testing Pl-16 Southern Calif. Testing Lab, Testing Pl-16 Jacqueline Streeter, Public Info. Workshop Leader Sun Electric Corporation, Tools Sun Litho, Facilities Plan Prints Sunnen Products Co., Motor The Suppliers, Drill Press & Tools Barbara Tooley, Public Info. Workshop Leader Jeannette Turk, Public Info. Workshop Leader Twining Laboratories, Testing Pl-16 ·uniloc, Inc., Test Equipment Jerri West, Public Info. Workshop Leader F. T. Ziebarth Company, Contractor PW-043 AMOUNT 10,5)3.22 2.:J. 00 99,582.89 20.00 55,536.65 L186. 05 18,645.31 45.00 25.00 313.90 l,829,022.Lt2 20.JO 115,682.l.JO 20.00 105.00 3,334.48 6,711.59 554.42 102,150.57 1,772.90 12,328.86 2,022.81 20.00 20.00 20.00 186.21 312.52 20.00 20.00 3,814. 93. 19,980.56 20.00 25.00 1 .. 011.24 3:672.19 4,192.42 25.00 130.00 212.76 20.00 Lt96.08 3,538.00 2,273.09 1,336.84 20.00 45.00 13.50 87li. 50 25.00 21,755.70 TOTAL CORF $2,323,014.0l TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF $2,555,995.86 AGENDA ITEM #8 "l-6" . DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 27348 Donahue ~ Co., Appraisal Fee, 2-14 27349 J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation, Contractor 2-15 27350 George Miller Construction Company, Contractor 2-16-1 27351 The Register, Bid Notice 2-14-3A, 2-14-4A, 2-14-5 27352 Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 2-15 27353 Southern California Testing Laboratory, Soils Testing 2-16-1 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 27354 Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 3-18, 3-20-1, 3-30-2, 3-21-1 27355 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-18, 3-20-1, 3-20-2, 3-21-1 27356 "Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 3-20-1, 3-20-2, 3-21-1 27357 Southern California Testing Laboratory, Soils Testing 3-20-1 27358 Sully Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 3-20-1 27359 A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N. M. Saliba, Contractor 3-18, 3-20-2, 3-21-1 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 27369 Portigal & Hammerton, Legal Services 5-19 "I I" AGENDA ITEM #~ . $ AMOUNT 2,950.00 79, 718. 72 39,555.27 314.50 156.00 308.87 $ 123,003.36 $ 20,359.50 1J341. 37 10,679.50 811. 20 455,347.50 968,785.78 $ 1,457,324.85 $ 126.56 "II" DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 27360 A. S. Peich, Inc., Refund Dewatering Permit FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 27361 Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 7-6-6, 7-6-8 27362 Melvin W. Brue, Refund Duplicate Permit Payment 27363 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 27364 Eugene Leviton, Refund Permit Overpayment 27365 Rogers & Davies, Contractor 7-6-7 27366 Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 7-6-7 27367 John Strader, Refund Duplicate Permit Payment 27368 L. L. Tasch, Refund Duplicate Permit Payment "III" AGENDA ITEM #8 $ $ AMOUNT 1,250.00 8,603.20 200.00 114 .42 20.00 6,492.00 104.00 100.00 200.00 $ 15,833.62 $ 17,083.62 "Ill" . .. RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS November 12, 1975 -7:30 P.M. . - "A-1" JOHN CAROLLO PHOENIX ARIZONA WALNUT CREEK CALIFORNIA ENGINEERS SANTA ANA CALIFORNIA JOHN A. CAROLLO, P. E. < 1906°1971 > H. HARVEY HUNT, P.E. HOWARD M. WAY, P.E. ROBERT G. WILLIAMS, P.E. WALNUT CP.EEK PLAZA, SUITE 750 1990 NORTH CALIFORNIA BLVD WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94596 AREA CODE: •4151 932-1710 DONALD R. PREISLER, P.E. GAIL P. LYNCH. P.E. WAL TEAR. HOWARD, P.E. Mr. Fred A. Harper County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Ave. Fountain Valley, California 92708 October 2 1, 19 7 5 Subject: Proposal for Engineering Services -Surg~ Tower Extension at Plant No .. 2 In accordance with the request of Mr. Ray Lewis and Nick DiBenedetto, we are submitting herewith this proposal to accomplish engineering services you require in connection with the subject project. We understand the scope of the project to be generally as set forth below. The estimated construction cost for this work is $75, 000. SCOPE OF PROJECT 1. Extend Surge Tower No. 2 by 30 feet. 2. Provide for stairway to top with observation platform at top. 3. Extension to be steel and painted. SCOPE OF WORK We propose to furnish the following engineering wot"k and services to the Districts in connection with design and construction of the subject project. 1. Hold detailed co:q.ferences with the Districts' staff to review and discuss the project. 2. Prepare final design contract drawings, in pencil, on mylar. Plans to be reproduced by the Districts. 3. Prepare contract detailed specifications, bid proposals, and other documents to be included with the Districts 1 standard general provisions and specifications. Specifications to be reproduced by the Districts. 4. Prepare a final cost estimate. AGENDA ITEM #9(A) -ALL DISTRICTS II A-1" "A-2" Mr. Fred A. Harper County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 2 October 21, 1975 5. Assist the Districts in securing and tabulating bids, analyzing bid r-esults, and furnishing recommendations on award. 6. Furnish general consultation and advice to the Districts as requested during construction. Districts to furnish supervision of construction and on job inspection. 7. Prepare supplementary sketches on design, if required, to resolve field conditions encountered. 8. Review detailed construction drawings, shop erection drawings, and equipment and materials sub~.ttals for compliance with the design concept. Make recommenda- tions to the Districts regarding approval of submittals. 9. Accompany the Districts inspection personnel on final inspection and submit final report on the completed project. 10. Prepare contract record drawings, which shall mean that whe11 conetr 1~1ction work h~s bee~ cc~Flcted 2.!'!d accepted by the Districts, Engineer shall supply to the Districts, to become the Districts 1 property, the original tracings of all plans for the work, modified to include any changes made during construction. Modifications to the original tracings will be based upon info rma ti on supplied to the Engineer by the resident engineer and resident staff employed by the Districts to furnish construction inspection. SCHEDULING We propose to accomplish the above scope of work \Items I through 10) in accordance with scheduling to be mutually agreed upon by the Districts and ourselves. We can complete plans, · specifications and final estimate within 60 days after notice to proceed. FEE We propose to provide the engineering services described above for a lump sum of $6, 500. We suggest that payments be made monthly, with 10% retention of said payments until completion of plans and specifications, with the retained 10% being payable as follows: 5% upon completion and submittal to the Districts of plans and specifications. AGENDA ITEM #9(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "A-2" : . Mr. Fred A. Harper ~ County Sanitation Districts II A-3" of Orange County Page 3 October 21, 1975 5% upon completion of construction and acceptance of the completed proj ect .. 1 We thank you for the opportunity of presenting this proposal. Very truly yours, HHH:kb AGENDA ITEM #9(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "A-3" "B" B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N SHEET Date October 21, 1975 -11:00 A.M. Contract For: .SANT A AfJA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER (FROM GROVE STREET TO IMPERIAL HIQ-IWAY) MANHOLE COVERS AND FRAMES CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3A CONTRACTOR Engineer's Estimate: $3,700.00 TOTAL BID 1. Long Beach Iron Works, Inc. Long Beach, California $3,604.00 2. John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. ParamotL1t $3,700.00 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. AGENDA ITEM #9(B) -DISTRICT 2 . "B" : . II C" B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N SHEET Date October 21, 1975 -11:00 A.M. Contract For: .SANTA mA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER (FROM IMPERIAL HIQ-IWAY TO GYPSUM CANYON ROAD), MANHOLE COVERS AND FRAMES CONTRACT NOo 2-14-4A Engineer's Estimate: $5,180.00 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Long Beach Iron Works, Inc. Long Beach, California $5,045.60 2. Kasler Corporation and L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc. A Joint Venture San Bernardino, California $5,880.00 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. AGENDA ITEM #9(c) -DISTRICT 2 "C" - "D-1" JOHN A. ARTUKOV~C~ §ONS, IlNC. GENERAL CONTRACTORS 16200 SOUTH ATLANTIC PLACE rc>ST OFFICE BOX ~30 • PAAAMOUHT. CALIFORNIA 90723 October 21, 1975 Orange County Sanitation District No. 2 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, Caliiornia Reference: \ ; (JU) tii.JJ47 • Construction of Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer and South Santa Ana River Interceptor Connector . . t Attention: Mr. Ray Lewis, Chief Engineer. Gentlemen: Pursuant to the discussions per ~ur recent telephone conversations relative to the contract notec?above, we are hereby formally request- ing the Board of Directors of the Sanitation Districts to accept an assignment of the contract from the entity of John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., the ·1ow bidder and m\"cxdee, to a new entity of John A. Artuko- vich Sons, Inc., and John A. Artukovich Jr., a Joint Venture. This request is in deference to the request of our bonding company, Safeco Insurance Company, .and in lieu of their requesting the personal general indemnity of John A. Artukovich Jr., and his wife .. A copy ot· a letter from our bonding agent is enclosed. By assignment to this joint venture, they will ·have in effect the same guarantee in that John A. Artukovich Jr., will be liable only on this contract or any others that are bid in that joint venture name. This situation is quite prevalent in the bonding business or industry today because of the financial situation bonding and insurance companies are finding themselves in because of the current economic conditions existing in the country today. Two bonding companies have become insolvent and declared bankruptcy in California recently. Our company has currently approximately $10,000,000.00, ot work under contract and we are contemplating bidding on some other large projects both in and out of this country. AGENDA ITEM #9Cn) -DISTRICT 2 "D-1" .. .. II D-2" (JU) •H-J247 Page II JOHN A. ARTUKOVICIHI §ONS, IlNC. GENERAL CONTRACTORS 16200 SOUTH ATLANTIC PLACE ftOST OFFICE BOX 530 PAIU.MOUHT, CALIFORNIA 9D72l Orange County Sanitaiion District No. 2 Mr. Ray Lewis Your acceptance ot this assignment would completely satisfy the ~equest of our bonding company and also give.the District accitional security in having both principles ori ithe bond. If there is any other inf onnation necessary to expedite the above requ·est please let us know as soon as possible. Very truly yours, JOHN A. ~RTUKOVICH SONS, INC., . Enc: 1 By: Q-71.,,, ~-. (-:::~z: -"--' ~ L.-> . ~' . (;'ohn A. Artukovi:Cfi, Jr.,:J?resident . ct( JAA/r . AGENDA ITEM #9(n) -DISTRICT 2 "D-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER ONTRACTOR: George Miller Construction Company PAGE 1 OF 2 OB: Kraemer Boulevard Interceptor Sewer, From Palm Drive to Imperial Highway, Contract No. 2-16-1 Amount of this Change 0 rder (ADD) (H~~~~l) $ 23,394.30 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or ont.ract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the fol lowing additions to or eductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's letter of September 3, 1975 and revised letter.of September 24, 1975 1. 2. 3. 4. s. 6. 7. 8. 9. Abandoned 30" strom drain not shown on plans at Station 188+70 to Station 189+04 18" irrigation line not shown on plans, Station 198+00, 18" storm drain pipe and concrete manhole in center of sewer trench not shown on plans. Had to strip out from Station 220+20 to 203+95 24" irrigation R.C.P. not shown on plans at Station 209+50 at Station 197+75. Irrigation line was shown to 45 approximately 20' west of centerline of trench. The line did not 45 and remained within· the trench prism. 2" water main not shown on plans at Station 214+55 · approximately 3' deep. Pacific Telephone cables not shown on plans at Station 221+18 3.5' in depth. Pacific Telephone cables not shown correctly on plans. at Station 228+91. Contractor located cables. Cables should have been at Station 227+92. 6" oil line and 2" gas line not shown on plans at Station 243+00 .12" casing 6" oil line inside: 2" gas line not shown on plans at Station 243+ 75. 6'' General .Telephone not shown on plans at Station 243+89 16" water line not shown on plans at Station 245+17 "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(E) DISTRICT 2 $2,827.50 4,911.63 1,115.48 600.00 649.83 800.00 979.12 1,804.84 1,432.95 "E-1'~ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS.AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. PAGE 2 OF 2 1 ------~----------~~---)N-~CTOR: George Miller Construction Company 0 ATE November 6, 1975 ~~~------------------~-- )8: Kraemer Boulevard Interceptor Sewer, From Palm Drive to Imperial Highway, Contract No. 2-16-1 10. 8" oil line not shown on plans at Station 250+10 and 6" General Telephone line not shown on plans at Station 250+28 11. 10" water line not shown on plans at Station 253+07 12. 7 ail lines not shown on plans between Station 256+50 · to Station .257+25 13. Water lines not shown on plans. 1-4" at Station 258+ 19, 1-3" at Station 258+50, and 1-3" at Station 258+63 14. 4" water line not shown on plans at Station 259+21 TOTAL ADD: Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD) ~ Amended Contract Price )ard authorization date: November 12, 1975 Approved: 1,837.76 1,749.11 2,829.22 1,237.93. 618.93 . $ 2 3, 39 4 • 30 $ 563,936. 80 $ o.oo $ 2 3, 394. 30 $ 587 J 331.10 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California Consulting Engineer By ________________________________ __ Chief Engineer Contractor "E-2" . AGENDA ITEM #9(E) -DISTRICT 2 . "E-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. 2 ~------~--~~--~- :>NTRACTOR: George Miller Construction Company DATE ________ N_o_v_e_mb __ e_r_6_,L--,..1_9_7_5~_'-11 __ _ JB: Kraemer Boulevard Interceptor Sewer, From Palm Drive to Imperial Highway, Contract No. 2-16-1 Amount of thl s Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ o.oo In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or ontract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to ·or eductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES ADD: Item Change Est'd Quantities No. Unit From To Sq.Ft. 7, 700 14,400 L. F. 2,589 5,178 DEDUCT: 10 l = ....... 372 0 )ard authorization date: November 12, 1975 '------------------------------------Consulting Engineer '------------------------------------Contractor Difference 6,700 2,589 @ $1/Sq.Ft. = @ $4/L.F. = Total Add: 9 $4/L.F. 6' 700. 00 10,356.00 17,056.00 l,400.UO Total Deduct: 1,488.00 TOI'AL ADD: 15,568.00 Original Contract Price $ 563,936.80 --------------------~ Prev. Auth. Changes $ 23,394.30 -------------------- This Change (ADD) (~~ $ 15,568.00 --------------------- Amended Contract Price $ 602,899.10 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, Califcrnia By------------------~---~------------Ch i e f Engineer "F" AGENDA ITEM #9(F) -DISTRICT'2 "F" "G" ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-16-1 AS CO~LETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-16-1 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange Cot.mty, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, George ~liller Construction Company, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for KRAEMER BOULEVARD INTERCEPTOR SEWER, PALM DRIVE TO IMPERIAL HIGHWAY, CONTRACT NO. 2-16-1, on the 21st of October, 1975; and, Section 2. That by letter, Lowry & Associates, District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the Di.str:i ct ha$ concurred in sai.d engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That Kraemer Boulevard Interceptor Sewer, Palm Drive to Imperial Highway, Contract No. 2-16-1, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 24th of April, 1975; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with George Miller Construction Company setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of said Kraemer Boulevard Interceptor Sewer, Palm Drive to Imperial Highway, Contract No. 2-16-1, is hereby approved; and, Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #9(G) -DISTRICT 2 II G" ,,. "H-1" 0 . r-<:~anaheim hills, inc. /:;,.~:~A Subsidiary of Grant Corporation September 30, 1975 Mr. Fred Harper General Manager Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 SUBJECT: Future Development Plans for Anaheim Hills Dear Mr. Harper: As a condition of our most recent annexation into Sanitation District No. 2, Anaheim Hills agreed to provide the Directors of the Sanitation Districts with a proposed phasing schedule of future annexations to the Sanitation District. We had originally p~omised to submit this phasing schedule to you 60 days after the hearing on our annexation request. Unfortunately, we were delayed several weeks due to not having our Chief Planner & Engineer available. We did not want to submit a partially completed or inaccurate plan for your review. We felt that if we had done that it would do a disservice to both the Districts and Anaheim Hills. We have itemized the proposed date of annexation, the gross areas involved and the total number of projected living units. I believe that these projections are extremely realistic, however, as we have found in tne recent past, our projections can vary considerably. Generally, we lose instead of gain time. Please note that the proposed year of annexation is not necessarily the date of development. Generally, we anticipate a minimum of one year lead time from the date of annexation to the time when the first units would be under construction. The attached list indicating gross areas includes only those portions of a development or planning unit which have not been previously annexed to the District. The number of living units we have indicated corresponds directly to those found on the General Plan of Development for Anaheim Hills. It is our sincere hope that this information will be of benefit to the District staff and Board of Directors. I would welcome the opportunity to be present at the time this information is made available to the Directors to answer any questions they may have concerning our future phasing. AGENDA ITEM #9(1) -DISTRICT 2 380 ANAHEIM HILLS ROAD, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92807, PHON6 17141 998-2000 "H-1" Proposed Date of Annexation 1976 1976 1976 1977 i9Z7 1977 ·1977 1978 1978 1979 1979 1980. 1980 Total Area For: 1976 -220 Acres 1977 -271 " 1978 -351 " 1979 -335 " 1980 -261 " HJS: 10/2/75 "H-2" PROPOSED ANNEXATION SCHEDULE FOR ANAHEIM HILLS PROPERTY PRESENTLY NOT IN SANITATION DISTRICTS Planning Unit Designation Gross Area I Cl 75 Acres IX Partial so " XIX-A Partial 95 ~· XIX-B 86 " IX Remainder 60 " II Partial 30 " XXIII 95 " II Remainder 35 " x 316 " IV 160 . " XXII 175 " XXIV 112 " III 149 ll No. of Livin3 180 300 300 500 700 200 300 200 2.530 600 200 150 ·860 Total 7,020 Total No. of Living Units AGENDA ITEM #9(1) 780 1,700 2,730 800 1,010 DISTRICT 2 Units "H-2" "H-3" Mr. Fred Harper, Gen. Mgr. Sanitation Districts of Orange County September JO, .. Page 2 Thank you for bearing with us in delaying this submittal to your agency. Please call me with any corrunents or questions you may have concerning this information. Sincerely yours, ANAHEIM HILLS, INC. \\\... \3~ Jags L. Barisic Vice President JLB:ls Enclosures AGENDA ITEM #9(1) -DISTRICT 2 "H-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108-4-4 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9270.'3 (71.C) 540-2910 November 5, 1975 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Fred A. Harper, General Manager w. N. Clarke, Superintendent Sewer Odor Related Problems Within the City of Fountain Valley (71.C) 962-2.C l I The City of Fountain Valley staff and the Sanitation District staff have received g number of odor complaints relative to the Districts' interceptor sewers that are in the City of Fountain Valley. The attached memorandum from John Waples, the Districts' Odor Consultant, partially addresses the problem and some of the remedial steps taken to date by the Districts' forces. These steps include the sealing of manholes in the areas of concern and the installation of "gas flaps" in the manholes of connecting local sewers. These flaps, while allowing the sewage to flow from the local sewer into the interceptor~ restrict the opening above the flow line thereby mini- mizing the amount of air and/or sewer gases which can travel back into the local sewer system. · We have also held discussions with the consulting firm of Hugh B. Carter Company regarding the design of an odor control scrubber and we have developed preliminary criteria necessary to do a cost and design analysis. Our plan provides for the installation of a scrubber at Plant No. 1 utilizing an existing District 36-inch pipe in Ellis Street as a means of collecting the air and gases from the interceptor sewers at the intersection of Ellis and Bushard. This approach will enable us to introduce a slightly negative pressure in the interceptor as far north as Westminster and Golden West Streets and accomplish the scrubbing on the Plant No. 1 property, thereby minimizing the need for handling of chemicals offsite. A more detailed plan, including cost estimates and construction scheduling will be presented for consideration prior to the December Board meeting. It should be pointed out that the odor problems relating to trunk and interceptor sewers are accentuated during the warm fall months. This, plus the recent construction of large interceptor sewers and the necessary diversion of small quantities of flow into them, have made this probably the Districts worst season for odors in the past 15 years. We will make every effort to arriye at a suitable, cost effective plan to treat these problems properly. "l-1" '1.lrze~ w. N. Clarke Superintendent AGENDA ITEM #9(K) -DISTRICT 3 "I-1" II I -2" To: Fred A Harper a!lu Bill Clarke. From: John R. Waples. Date: 9-24-75. Subject: Odor invest~gation along Magnolia Street (Warner to Talbert),F.V I investigated the area 6:00 P. M. 9-23-75· Due to the excessive traffic it was difficult to do a thorough job. I did note some odor at the rr.anhole on the Jl7 trunk line at El Presedente and r1Lagnolia. There was some odor from the District manholes on the Miller-Holder line, also, from 1he F.V. manhole at El Presedente. Wednesday.9-24-75,6,00 A.M.,I checked the above area and there was less traffic. The condition relative to odor was approx! the same as .described ~ove. It was noted as the cars drove over the manholes they pulled odor out,and of course the odor became distributed in the atmosphere. 7:)0 A.M. ,Richard Fuentes and I checked the records to determine where and how many connections F. V. had on the the two lines from Warner to Talbert. There are five connections on each line. 8:00 A. M. ,Richa~d c:-..nd crew proc8cd8d to Talbert ar1d Magnclia. :,·Je checked the ma.nht.:les east uf r~'lagnolia at Talbert and noted odor coming from the District manholes. The manhole covers dovm to Bay Street were sealed, including the one on the Security Nat'l. Bank parking lot. After these were sealed,! checked the manhole at Oak Street (.E of Bay) and there was considerable odor coming OJJt. ·rhis is a relatively heavy populated a.rea,l'v1obile Home pa~k on the S. As a result of this evidence,Richard contacted Marshall Fairres via radio and was instructed to continue sealing manholes in the area. When I left the area at 9:00 A.M. the crew was spraying the manhole at Magnolia and El Presedente (E side) with odor mask. They were then going to seal the covers on r·.iiller-Holder and all the F. V. covers (ten in number). ·There is a good possibility that the odor will now flow into the collection lines and be vented from the nearest houses. Larry Williams, F. V, Public :,·'Jerks and I are meeting Bill Clarke in Bill's office 3:00 P. M. this date to discuss the problem. There is an unresolved problem on the cul-d-sac at Tahoe Cir., F.V •• It appears that gas(sewer) is coming from the District line and discharging from F. V's.manhole. AGENDA ITEM #9(K) -DISTRICT 3 "1-2" 3:00 p.m. this date: Larry Williams, Don Bryan, Ron Smith, Fountain Valley rcpresent~tives, met with Bill Clarke and me in Bill's office. The objective of the ~ meeting was to work cooperatively on the odor problem in the city of Fountain Valley. It was resolved that Ron Smith and Mike Mendez (CSDOC) are to coordinate the installation of "gas flaps" in Fountain Valley collection lines as they enter the Districts' line. Ron already knows where some installations are to be made. They will start the project at 7:00 a.m. on September 25, 1975- II I-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(K) -DISTRICT 3 "l-3" "J-1" RESOLUTION NO. 75-152-5 INCREASING CONNECTION CHARGES ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO. 507, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1976 A RESOLlITIO~ OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, INCREASING CONNECTION CHARGES ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO. 507, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1976 * * * * *· * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 507 of the District provides that specified increases in sewer connection charges shall become effective on January 1, 1973, and on each succeeding January 1, provided the Directors of the District, by resolution, duly so resolve and direct. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 does hereby resolve and direct as follows: Section 1. Effective January 1, 1976, the connection charge for new construction, family dwelling buildings, as defined by Ordinance No. 507, shaii be $i75 per dwelling unit. Section 2. Effective January 1, 1976, the connection charge for new construction, other than family dwelling buildings, as defined by Ordinance No. 507, shall be $90.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction and the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $90.00. Section 3. Effective January 1, 1976, the connection charge for replacement buildings and the credit against such charge, as defined in Ordinance No. 507, shall be established in Ordinance No. 507, as modified by Section 1 and Section 2 hereof. Section 4. Effective January 1, 1976, the connection charge for additions to or alterations of existing buildings where further new con- struction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of family ~welling buildings or the area of building to be used for other than family dwelling AGENDA ITEM #9Co) -DISTRICT,5 "J-1" "J-2" buildings shall be $175 for each dwelling unit addc<l or crcatc<l and i11 the case of new construction other than family dwelling buildings, it shnll be $90.00 per 1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained in such new construction and the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $90.00. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #9(o) -DISJ~ICT .5 "J-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER ONT RAC TOR: Rogers & Davies DATE November 6, 1975 -----~~--~~-:...~~~~------- OB: Tustin-Orange Tnink Sewer, Reaches 11 and Portion of 12, Contract No. 7-6-7 Amount of th ts Change Order (X»») (~~) $ 0.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or ontract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or ~ductions from the contract price are hereby approved. AnJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES DEDUCT: Item Cllange Est'd Quantities No. Unit From To 2 L.F. 5,498 5,492 ll EAUI 2 1 12 EAOi 2 1 13 C.Y. 10 0 Difference 6 @ $32/L.F. 1 @ $250 EAQ-1 1 @ $350 EAQ-1 10 @ $40/C.Y. TOTAL DEDUCT: Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (~"tl.~) (DEDUCT) Amended Contract Price 192.00 250. 00 350.00 400.00 $1,192.00 $ 349, 818.00 $ o. 00 $ 1,192.00 $ 348, 626. 00 oard authorization date: November 12, 1975 Approved: y------------------~--~--------~--C on s u 1 ting Engineer y ________________________________ ~-- Contractor COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF 0 range County, Ca 1 i forn i a By -----------------------------------Chief Engineer "K" AGENDA ITEM #9(Q) -DISTRICT '7 "K" "L" RESOLUTION NO. 75-153-7 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-6-7 AS CO~WLETE A RESOLlITION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUN1Y, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-6-7 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of Cotmty Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange Cotmty, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. 1bat the contractor, Rogers & Davies, has completed the constn.iction in accordance with the terms of the contract for TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, REACH 11 AND A PORTION OF REACH 12, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-7, on the 31st of October, 1975; and, Section 2. That by letter, Boyle Engineering Corporation, District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 11 and a Portion of Reach 12, Contract No. 7-6-7, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 29th of May, 1975; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Rogers & Davies setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of said Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 11 and a Portion of Reach 12, Contract No. 7-6-7, is hereby approved; and, Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #9(R) -DISTRICT,7 "L" "M" RESOLUTION NO. 75-155-7 ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASE~IENT FROM TIJSTIN CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. AND AU1lIORIZING EXEClITION OF QUITCLAIM DEED .A RESOLtITION OF TIIE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM TUSTIN CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. RE TRACT NO. 5448, AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF QUITCLAIM DEED TO TUSTIN CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. FOR PORTION OF SAID EASEMENT IN CONSIDERATION THEREFOR * * * * * * '* * * * * * * 1he Board of Directors of Col.mty Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant cf Easement dated October 17, 1974, wherein an easement within Tract No. 5448 in the vicinity southerly of Newport Avenue and Cowan Heights Drive and westerly of Skyline Drive for sanitary sewer purposes is granted to Cotmty Sanitation District No. 7, is hereby accepted from Tustin Construction Co., Inc.; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and: Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is in consideration for that certain quitclaim described in Section 5 herein; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of Cotmty Sanitation District No. 7 be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange Cotmty, California; and, Section 5. That the certain Quitclaim Deed dated November 12, 1975, for an abandoned existing sewer easement on Lot 9 of Tract 5448, from Cotmty Sanitation District No. 7 to Tustin Construction Co., Inc. be approved; and, Section 6. That the real property to be quitclaimed is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "C" and "D", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution;ands Section 7. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District be authorized and directed to execute said Quitclaim Deed, quitclaiming the District's interest in the certain real property hereinabove described. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #9(r) -DISTRICT 7 II M" .. .. "N-1" Cou~~ l Y SMnTATION D!s1 r:1u ~. of Ul\Ar~Gl Lou NlY, CAur ()U~" P.O. lJOX 8127 IOR4"4 [LllS AVENUE fOUNl AIN VALL[ Y, CAL If Qi{NIA 91 !Ur (71-4) 5-40-7910 (71..C) 962-2411 MEMORANDUM November 6, 1975 TO: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer SUBJECT: Contract No. ll-4R Bid Reconunendation Having reviewed the bids for Contract No. ll-4R, I recommend award to the low bidder, Clifford L. Thompson Construction Company. Although an irr~~1lari~y in Schedule B was noted~ the Schedule A bid price is in accordance with our cost estimates. I have verified this Schedule A price with Clifford Thompson and he concurs with a total price of $19,821.00 Southern California Gas Company has agreed to pay their share of the work, which totals $3,000.00. This amount will bring the cost to the District down to $16,821.00. ND:hje c olas DiBenedetto Associate Engineer the above recommendation AGENDA ITEM #9Cu) -DISTRICT 11 ''N-1" :::: :z I N :::: CONTRACT FOR: CO~TRACTOR BID TABULATION SHEET REIDDEL NEWLAND-HAMILTON PUMPING STATION FACILITIES CO}..'TRACT NO. ll-4R - SCHEDULE A :i> ~-========-===-==:a=-:=====-============-================;: Cj) 1. ITEM I 1tp1 2 ITEM 3 rn *Clifford L. Thompson Construction Co. :z ~ Santa Ana, CA ..._... 2 • Technical Utilities -I rn Downey, CA 3 :::: :z , .. I N ::: 3. 5. 6. 7. 9. o. Masonry Engineers Inc. Long Beach, CA *Irregularity in bid proposal. ( $12, 541. 00 $3, =~56. 00 $3,924.00 ·-$17,528.00 $3,840.00 $2,766.00 $24,160.00 $Spl20.00 $2,500.00 DATE October 30, 1975 -11:00 A.M. SCHEDULE A SCHEDULE 8 $19,821.00 Incomplete $24,134.00 $18,634.00 $31,780.00 $27,780.00 ( .· COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P.O A0X ll177 10844 ELLI~ AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92703 November 4, 1975 M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager FROM: w. N. Clarke, Superintendent SUBJECT: Bird Machine Company Centrifuge Parts (714) 54 ~-2910 (714) 962-24 1 1 Operating and test data from work done in the ·sludge dewatering area during the past serveral months indicate the n~ed for some changes in both equipment and operating modes. 0 As described in the report done by w. H. Fox, the Districts' Operations Engineer, on thickened feed and alternate polymer feed points, the equipment needs are twofold. One requirement is to add externally adjustable bowl-head skimmers to three centrifuges, the use of which could have a potential of saving $34 to $82 per day in polymer costs, plus the benefit of a slightly drier sludge cake. The other requirement is to procure two complete rotating elements (which will fit the existing four centrifuges) to facilitate repairs while continuing the program of sludge dewatering on a continuous basis. As directed by the Board on September 10, 1975, I entered into negotiations with the Bird Machine Company of South Walpole, Mass., for the purchase of three sets of centrifuge bowl-head sldI!k"11ers and two sets of rotating elements, our Specification No. E-077· In an endeavor to establish a fair market price, I secured the price for two complete machines which were bid in April, 197L~ in conjunction with our Contract No. Pl-16. The total price for the two machines and appurtenances, at that time, was $295,000. The competitively priced machines, which were successfully bid on Pl-16 by the Sharpless Company, cost $253,000 which included two complete centrifuges and two 200 horsepower electric motors. We had considered installing a complete new centrifuge at Plant No. 2 and our estimate and approved budget figure for that project was $250,000. "0-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "0-1" .tt·rea A. Harper -2-November 4, 1975 I met with Messrs. Tom Burns, the Western Sales Manager, and Glen Reierstad, Sales Engineer of the Walnut Creek office of the Bird Machine Company, and established unit prices and terms ana conditions for the equipment in question. The two rotating elements are of the greatest magnitude and the longest delivery (12 months). As a result of our negotiations, the following options are presented for consideration: OPTION #1 Cl A. Base price Payable 30 days after delivery (12 months) OPTION #2 A. B. c. OPTION #3 Base price For advance 5 months - • Total price A. Base price payment of $50,000 DEDUCT for Option /f2 at B. For advance payment of $50~000 at 5 IUC;1°ths z~ DED!_ICT $190,595 $190,595 8,ooo $182,595 $190,595 $182,595 c. 30% ($51,698) of total called "Material Contentrr to be subject to price adjust- ment at time of shipment (historically 1/2% per month -$3100) -DEDUCT $ 10,335 D. Total price for Option #3 $172,260 A Faithful Performance Bond will be supplied by Bird Machine Company for the entire amount. A one-year warranty is included on all equipment Payment will be maqe 30 days after delivery of either rotating element in a condition satisfactory to the Districts. Based on the information secured, it is my recommendation that ·we enter into a purchase contract with the Bird Machine Company for two sets of rotating elements as spelled out in the attached quotation, in the amount of $172,260 plus freight, taxes, and price escalation (Option #3) . "0-2" V7i~ w. N. Clarke Superintendent AGENDA ITEM #12(A) -ALL DISTRICJS "0-2" November 4, 1975 As a part of the negotiations it was determined that the below listed items, which are common to all of the centrifuges and could be delivered in a shorter time frame, would be best purchased as a separate order. Item B -Three liC(Pnversion kits" for adding bowl- head skimmers to the existing Bird 36x96 centrifuges, similar to your Order No. 26539, Items A through M. Delivery is 18-22 weeks. Price: $4,839 x 3-----------------------$14,517.00 Item C -One Bird SA-70 gear unit, to fit all four existing machines plus the two rotating assemblies, ratio 116:1. Delivery is 20-26 weeks. Price: ---------------------------------$11,949.00 Item D -One pair of pillow blocks, inter- changeable with all four Bird 36x96 centrifuges. Delivery is 8-10 months. ~· ,, t::"'., ,... ....... Price: --~------------------------------£ ~,uc~.vv TOTAL $31,087.00 The above prices are subject to California sales tax and are f.o.b. South Walpole, Mass. A one-year warranty is included on all equipment. Payment will be made 30 days after delivery in a condition satisfactory to the Districts for items as listed above. Based on the information secured, it is my recommendation that we enter into a purchase contract with the Bird Machine Company for the above-listed items as set out in the attached quotation, in the amount of $31,087, plus California sales tax and freight. WNC:gg "0-3" 'l.l'Y/t/~ w. N. Clarke Superintendent AGENDA ITEM #12(A) -ALL DISTRlCTS "0-3" II P" RESOLtITION NO. 75-157 APPROVING PURD-IASE CONTRACT WITH BIRD MACHINE CO. A JOINT RESOLlJfION OF TI-IE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUlliORIZING EXECUTION OF PURCHASE CONTRACT wrrn BIRD MACHINE COMPANY FOR CENTRIFUGE PARTS * * * * * * * * * * * * * 1he Boards of Directors of Cotmty Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange Cotmty, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. 1bat the certain Purchase Contract dated by and between Cotmty Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County and Bird Machine Company for purchase of centrifuge parts pursuant to Specification No. E-077, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said parts is hereby authorized in the amotmt appurtenances, and $172,260.00 plus tax and freight for two sets of rotating elements pursuant to the terms and conditions of said contract; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General CotmSel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #12(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "P" "Q-1" RESOLUTION NO. 75-145 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTAB- LISHING PROCEDURES FOR THE COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT OBLIGATIONS OWING TO THE DISTRICTS. MIBREAS, in the course of conducting the business affairs of the Districts, certain accounts receivable become delinquent and, in fact, uncollectable; and WHEREAS, the costs incurred by the Districts in attempting collection of delinquent accounts receivable can exceed the amounts recovered; and WHEREAS, costs and efficiency can be greatly improved by the adoption of certain policies relating to the collection of accounts. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER: Section 1. The Finance Director is authorized to write off as an uncollectable debt any delinquent obligation owing to the Districts in excess of ninety (90) days and not exceeding the sum of Twenty-five Dollars ($25. 00). Section 2. The Finance Director is authorized to assign for collection to a person or firm of his choosing, any delinquent obligation owing to the Districts in excess of ninety (90) days and not exceeding the sum of Five Hundred Dollars ($500. 00). Section 3. The Finance Director is authorized to file the neces~ary proceedings in the Small Claims Court of the respective judicial district of the County of Orange in order to collect any delinquent obligation owing to the Districts in excess of ninety (90) days and not exceeding the sum of Five l~ndrcd Dollars ($500.00). AGENDA ITEM #13(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "Q-1" "Q-2" Section 4. In addition to the above, the Finance Director shall forward any delinquent obligation in excess of Five Ilun<lrcd Dollars ($SOO.OO) to the General Counsel for the Districts who shall submit his recommendation to the Boards of Directors as to the method of collection of said account. Section S. In addition to the above authorizations, the finance Director is directed to exercise all available lawful methods to insure prompt and full recovery of all obligations owing to the Distric~s. Section 6. The Finance Director is authorized to offset against any sums held on deposit by the Districts on behalf of any person who owes a delinquent obligation to the Districts. Section 7. The Finance Director is authorized to withhold the approval of any permits otherwise to be issued by the Districts to any person who has an outstanding debt obligation owing to the Districts until such time as said debt obligation is paid in full. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #13(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "Q-2" II R" RESOLtrrION ~O. 75-146 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATIOl\ DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING REPRESENTATIVES FOR TI-IE DISTRICTS TO ACT AS AGENTS ON THEIR BEHALF IN THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT OF TIIE WEST ORANGE COUNTY JUDICIAL DISTRICT * * * * * * * * * * * ~11EREAS, the Boards of Directors deem it necessary to periodically commence legal action in the Small Claims Court to collect debts owing to the Districts; and, WHEREAS, these legal proceedings must be filed on a continuing basis; and, WHEREAS, the rules of the court provide that attorneys shall not be allowed to appear and represent parties to these proceedings; and, WHEREAS, it is necessary to appoint agents for the Districts to act for and on their behalf in the Small Claims Court of the West Orange Cotmty Judicial District, NOW, iHEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange Cotmty, California, DO HEREBY DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER: Section 1. That those persons set forth on Exhibit "A" to this resolution are appointed to represent and· appear for the Districts on any and all claims filed in the Small Claims Cou~t of the West Orange Cotmty Judicial District; and, Section 2. That the Board of Directors are authorized to change the personnel set forth on Exhibit "A" to this resolution by minute order. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #13CB) -ALL DISTRICTS "R" F "S" November 5, 1975 TO: FROM: M E M 0 R A N D U M ---------- Fred A. Harper, General Manager w. N. Clarke, Superintendent vUUNIT 01\f'lll/\JIUr~ u::_,rr.n of 0HANG[ COUNTY. LJ\Lll u1u.o, P. 0 BOX er;· 10844 llll~ AVI 1i1 '' fOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALllOMNIA 9//u 1714) )40·2111< (714) 962-241 I SUBJECT: Sale of Sludge -Specification No. S-016 On Thursday, October 30, the Districts ~pened bids for the sale of digested sewage sludge. The call for bids was advertised in accordance with the provisions contained in the current Purchasinc Resolution. The specifications contained three different bid items and bidders were invited to bid on any or.all of the items as they saw tit. Bid Item No. 1 provides for the continuation of a land-dryin[ operation using D1s~ricts 1 equipment and personnel (at the presen~ time Districts• costs for this operation are approximately $5.85 per cubic yard of sludge in a condition suitable for shipment). Bid Item No. 2 provides for contractor's trucking of sludge to landfill or ofisi~e drying operation using contractor's equipmen~ and personnel (this would be utilized only when conditions precluded the orderly operatic~ cf l~d-d~yi~g on Dist~icts' property). Bid Item No. 3 provides for land-drying operation on District~' property using con~ractor's equipment and personnel. The only bids received were from the firms of Kellogg Supply.· Inc. and Golden West Fertilizer Co. They are as indicated belo~. BID TABULATION Contractor Kellogg Supply Inc. Golden West Fertilizer Co. Bid Item 1 2 3 1 2 3 Payment to Districts +50¢ c.y. +10¢ c.y. +$1. 53 c .y. Cos "t tc· Distric-cs -$2. 56 c .y. -$3· 50 c -:: . -$2.505 c.y. Based upon the bids received and considering the cost of our present operation, it is recommended that the award of a contract for a period of one year (with provisions to extend for two addi- tional one-year periods) be made to the Kellogg Supply, Inc. for Bid Items No. 2 and 3. WNC:gg Attachment ll/n~ w. N. Clarke Superintendent AGENDA ITEM #14(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "S" "T" RESOLUTION NO. 75-147 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH KELLOGG SUPPLY, INC. A JOINT RESOLlITION OF TIIE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTIIORIZING EXECtrrION OF AGREEMENT WITH KELLOGG SUPPLY, INC. FOR SALE OF DIGESTED SEWAGE SLUDGE * * * * * * * * * * * 1be Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, CalifoTilia 00 HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. 'Ib.at the certain agreement dated by and ~~~~~~~~~ between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange Cotmty and Kellogg Supply, Inc. for Sale of Digested Sewage Sludge, Specification No. S-016, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the General Manager is hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1975. AGENDA ITEM 14(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "T,, STATE Of CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN jR., Govern.or STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD lCOt1'.0Cmtl~!'O~~~ ~Wft~~~tp(X~i "U-1" P. O. Box 100 Sacramento, CA 95801 {916) 445-7765 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON THE POSSIBLE DESIGNATION OF THE SOUTH COAST AREA AS A 208 PLANNING AREA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the State Water Resources Control Board, pursuant to the authority vested by Section 208 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act .Amendments of 1972 and pur- suant to regulations contained in Subchapter 18, Chapter 3, Title 23, California Administrative Code, proposes to receive evidence on the appropriate area(s) and planning agency(s) which may be considered for designation for areawide waste treatment management planning in the South Coast Area. ~ NOTICE IS ALSO GIVEN that evidence will be received at a public hearing to be held at 10 a.m. on November 17~ 1975 in Room L-6, Los Angeles County Health Service Auditorium, 3f3 North Figueroa, Los Angeles, California .. NOTICE IS ALSO GIVEN that the Executive Officer of the State Water Resources Control Board, acting pursuant to authority delegated by the Board, did on March 12, 1975, identify the South Coast Area as follows: ALL OF ORANGE COUNTY AND THOSE PORTION) OF VENTURA, LOS ANGELES, RIVERSIDE, AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES LYING WITHIN THE SANTA CLARA, LOS ANGELES, AND SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN PLANNING AREAS, AND THAT PORTION OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY LYING NORTHWEST OF THE SANTA MARGARITA RIVER SUBBASIN AND SOUTH OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN PLANNING AREA. · After a public hearing held in April 1975, the Board sustained its earlier designation of the Ventura County portion of the South Coast Area and continued the Board's earlier nondesignation of the remaining portion of the South Coast Area. The Board took this action primarily as a result of a general lack of local support for designation of the entire South Coast Area. By notice dated August 4, 1975, the Executive Officer of the State Board expressed the Board's intent to pursue the establishment of one or more 208 planning areas in the nondesignated portion AGENDA ITEM #15 -ALL DISTRICTS "U-1" .. ' "IJ-2" -2- of the South Coast Area. Subsequent to the August 4 notice, inquiries and proposals for designation have been submitted as follows: Designation of the Malibu-Santa Monica mountains area with the County of Los Angeles, Department of Regional Planning, as the designated planning agency; Designation of a joint powers agency which would be created by execution of an agreement between Orange County Sanitation District, City of Los Angeles, and Sanitation Districts of Los Angele.s County. The · designated area would be that area within the juris- diction of the three parties to the joint powers agreement; Designation of the area lying within the Santa Ana Water Project Authority with designation of the Authority as the 208 planning agency, and; Designation of the entire South Coast Area with designa- tion of the Southern California Association of Governments {SCAG) as a 208 p~anning agency. The Southern California Association of Governments has requested that a public hearing be held on the subject at hand. It is the State Board's position that recommendations for designation should be accompanied by the following information: • Description of the area proposed for designation. Description of the water quality problems existing in the area. Description of the institutions that would be most affected by the designation. Description of the appropriate composition of the governing body of the agency recommended for designation. Description of· the planning program that would be accomplished, including anticipated outputs. Description of the powers and authorities of the agency recommended for designation. Recommendations of individual local governments, both general and special purpose, within the area proposed for designation regarding the proposed designation. AGENDA ITEM #15 -ALL DISTRICTS "IJ-2" • . ' "U-3 11 -3- Because of the broad environmental assessment which will be required for the plan, it is the State Board staff's position . that any agency or aeencies recommended for designation Bhould be capable of addres~ing and analyzing a broad spectrum of water-related envlronmental issues, including but not limited to nonpoint sources of water pollution, air pollution and land use. NOTICE IS ALSO GIVEN that interested persons may present statements and arguments o~ally or in writing at the November 17, 1975, hearing. Of particular interest to the State Board will be the conditions which now exist and which are different from conditions which existed at the time of the State Board's hear- ing in April 1975; the appropriateness of each of the alternatives for designation which have been described herein; and any recom- mendations regarding the appropriate area(s) and agency(s) that should be considered for designation. · NOTICE IS ALSO GIVEN that because of administrative time schedules and requirements, written statements must be presented on or prior to the November 17, 1975, hearing. Such written statements should be submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board, P.· 0. Box 100, Sacramento, CA 95801. The State Board will determine, at a scheduled meeting, if any part of the South Coast Area should be designated as an areawide waste treatment management planning area. Any designation by the State Board will be for the purpose of designating the appro- priate boundaries of the area and an appropriata planning orgc~J1i;:: zation which fulfills those requirements contained in Section ~Uv of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 and Subchapter 18, Chapter 3, Title 23, California Administrative Code. Any area designated may be of greater or lesser extent than that area identified by the Executive Officer, depending upon evidence received at this public hearing. The State will designate appropriate management agencies to implement the developed plan pursuant to Section 208 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 and will use its enforcement authorities, as necessary and appro- priate, to assure implementation • This notice is intended to satisfy applicable requirements of federal regulations contained in Part 105, Subchapter D, Chapter 1, CFR, Title 40 • Dated: OCT 1 6 1975 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD L? :LI 11. Ll~L Bill B. Dendy --, Executive Officer AGENDA ITEM #15 -ALL DISTRICTS 11 U-3" "V-1" B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N S H E E T Date October 21, 1975 -11: 00 A. M. Contract For: . SANTA ~A RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER (GYPSUM°CANYON ROAD TO ORANGE COUNTY LINE) REAQIES 6 , 7 & 8 CONTRACT NO. 2-14-5 Engineer's Estimate: $2,483,167.00 CONTRACTOR 1. S. S. Zarubica Sun Valley, California 2. Sully-Miller Contracting Company Long Beach, California 3. Steve Bubalo Construction Co. Reseda, California 4. Steve P. Rados, Inc. Santa Ana, California 5. Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc. South El Monte, California 6. Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc. San Bernardino, California 7. Tab Construct ion, Inc. Las Vegas, Nevada 8~ Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. Upland, California 9. L. S. Hawley Corp. and Bebek Co., J.V. Irvine, California 10. Paul Hubbs Construction Co. Rialto, California 11. George Miller Construction Company Los Angeles, California AGENDA ITEM f28 -DISTRICT 2 TOTAL BID $2,096,676.15 c $2,442,389.00 $2,485,635.00 $2,487,316.00 $2,501,978.00 $2,533,891.00 $2,619,463.00 $2,672,157.00 $2,695,585.00 $2,719,517.00 $2,732,387.70 11 V-l" ''V-2" BID TABULATION SHEET . Date October 21, 1975 Contract For: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACHES 6, 7 & 8, CONTRACT NOo 2-14-5 Continued ....... . 12. R. L. Thibodo Construction Co., Inc. San Marcos, California 13. K. E. C. Company & Keith E. Card, A Jt. Venture Hawaiian Gardens, California 14 • Mark Dakovich, Inc. Brea, California 15. R. E. and R. W. Crane, Inc. Long Beach, California . 16. 17 . . 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. AGENDA ITEM #28 -DISTRICT 2 $2,848,832.00 $2,861,526.00 $3,326,869.00 $3,517,989.00 "V-2" ,_, "W" CITY OF COSTA MESA CALIFORNIA 92626 P. 0. BOX 1 200 FROM THE OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICES October 27, 1975 Mr. Fred Harper General Manager Orange County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. Harper: The City of Costa Mesa is in the process of developing several park sites in County Sanitation District No. 7. Since these sites reflect considerable acreage, but very little in the way of usage of sewer facilities, we would like to request that the District No. 7 Acreage Fees ($562.50/acre) be waived on park developments. The following is a brief description of the proposed park sites and the acreage involved: 1. Wakeham Park -10 acre community park with two restrooms and one drinking fountain. 2. Gisler Park -2.8 acre neighborhood park with one drinking fountain. 3. Bear Street Park -4 acre neighborhood park, as yet unplanned. · 4. Paulo Park -2.5 acre neighborhood park, as yet unplanned. In addition, there is a possibility of future acquisition and development of three other sites within the district. The necessary connection fees and annexation fees will be collected on these developments. We appreciate your consideration of this request. JHE:km truly yours, Eldridge ctor of Public Services/ Engineer AGENDA ITEM f.l3l -DI STR.I CT 7 "W" ·r "X" RESOLUTION NO. 75-159-5 APPROVING MEMBERSHIP IN NIWA FOR BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE COUN1~ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICf NO. S OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INCLUSION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE COUNTY AS AN ADDITIONAL MEMBER AGENCY OF THE NEWPORT-IRVINE WASTE MANAGEMEITT PLANNING AGENCY IN ACCORDANCE WITII CONDITIONS OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS' RESOLUTION NO. 75-1431 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement dated March 28, 1975, the Newport-Irvine Waste Management Planning Agency (NIWA) has heretofore been created; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Orange Cormty has requested inclusion as a party to said agreement and member of the Newport-Irvine Waste Management Planning Agency; and, WHEREAS, Section 36 of said agreement provides for admission of new members. No. 5 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That inclusion of the Board of Supervisors of Orange Cormty as an additional member agency of the Newport-Irvine Waste Management Planning Agency (NIWA) is hereby approved in accordance with the conditions set forth in the Board of Supervisors' Resolution No. 75-1431, pursuant to Section 36 of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement creating said agency; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized to execute an addendum to said agreement authorizing inclusion of the Board of Supervisors of Orange Cotmty, as provided in Section 1 hereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #34 -DISTRICT·S "X" .. .. -;, . . SUPCRV150il. ,-IFTti DISTRICT . TII0~11\S F. RILEY ORANGE: COUNTY ElOARD or !:iUPERVl~ORS ORANGE COUNTY ADr.flNl~TnATION 8UILOING 515 NORTH SYCAMORE. P.O. EJOX GD7. SANTA ANA.CAL1f"OiH-.1A 92702 PHONE: 834-3550 (AREA CODC:. 714) September 29, 1975 .· .. The Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Orange 515 North Sy~amore Street Santa Ana, California 92701 Gent l ernen : Subject: Newport Bay Water Quality Planni.ng - t,10 /'lf._irJtA..,!. Ct••ift..'r Ot-.'I! <:J.. Narrative: The Board of Supervisors continued the proposed Ne\·1port Bay . Water Qua 1 i ty Planning Program for 30 days to a 110\·1 for Supervisor Riley to ~eet with apptopriate agencies to determine their input and recow.mendationsT As a result Of" ""h;c mno+1·nn so"ov-;il rh=-ir.nns ~.,,.o p....-opnr::-ori t .., ·~ •• ,_\.... ...... ' ::;,, ._..,~. '-4 -·'"'""" •:;.>'-c .• \.,. • .......-'"--~ On September 2, 1975 ,-the Ne\·1port Bay Water Quality Pl anni.ng Program ··was continued, This v1as to a11m·1 an opportunity for me to invite representatives of various involved agencies to discuss the proposed ~gency and·to develop their·recommendations.pertaining to the proposed work pr.ogram~ Such a meeting was held on September 8, 1975~ Representatives of the Department of Fi sh and Galile, the Irvine Ranch Hater Di std ct, the Ne\·J- port/ Irvine t~aste Management Planni.ng Agency, the city of r!e\·1port Beach~ Supervisor Clark's office, the Director of the Environmental Man~gement f\gency, a member of my staff, and I \·:ere present~ The discussion generally centered on the best way to achieve effective results in improving and enhancing the \·Jater quality and wildlife potential of Nc\·1port Bay for the least amount of cost and duplication of effort. It was agreed by those present that the program should be rcstructered to incl~de the following points; L The county should assume the:~lead responsibility for the joint powers agency, Tm·wrd this end it appears clcsirilble for tlH EM/\ to provide staff for this purpose and for the County Counsel to pro- ..._.. vide legal counsel for the agency. "Y-1" AGENDA ITEM #34 -DISTRIC~ 5 "Y-1~' ,. "Y-2" The Honorable Bourd of Supervisors Page T\·10 September 29, 1975 2. Members of the agency should include: the county, the cities of Nc\'/port Beach, lrvine, 2nd any other \'Jatershed city \'lishin~J to join, the Irvine Ranch Hater District, County Sanit'1tion District r:0. 5, the Orange County \·later District, and the Deportm2nt of rish and . Game. At the time of the meeting, it was unclear whether or not Fish and Game could legally be a rr.2mber of the agency, Since then the Governor has signed SB-1257, which a116ws the Director df Fish and Game.to serve on the _agency. The possibility of the Santa Ana Reg i ona 1 Water Qua} i ty Boa rd becom- ing a member was discussed. It was concluded that while their membership was desirable, it is unknown whether or not it is legally possible. ·If legal representation on the agency is not possible, it is expected that the regional board.would still play an. important role in the conduct of the studies. 3. Staff capabilities and expertise of all agencies should be made ava i1ab1 e to the agency on an 11 as-needed 11 basis. It is hoped that such sharing of s·taff \·lill help reduce the need for outside consultants. 4, The work program should riilVC a sho:·te:' Lime frame .ti:2n proposal of five years, . 5. The agency should also provide a forum for cooperative planning of rehabilitation programs for the Upper Bay, including possible ~ilot dredgin~ programs. · These clw_nges have been discussed with the Director of the EMA) v:ho concurs with the modifications. Recommended Action: Refer proposed ~odifications of the Newport Bay Water Quality Study to the Director of the EMA., County Counsel, and th2 mem- bers of NIHA to incorporate the recozr~'ilendecl changes and report back to the Board of Supervisors, . R~~Ctfully, ~ vfftlf:,ef~y /1Ui· Thomas F. Ri l cy • L-J ·Supervisor, Fifth District TFR: seh AGH.JDA ITEM f131J -DI$TRICT 5 "Y-2" .-. ···r i .. ; .J > ::It- .... 2 0 z ::> ::> 0 ~~v -w , ~ > ::> ' ... ~ z 0 -< =>a: ~(I 2 3 4 5 6 I 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ii II 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 .28 29 30 31 ""-"' ~2 "Z-1" RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE COGNTY, CALIFO~'n.-=-~ October 7, 1975 On motion of Supervisor Riley, duly seconded and carried, the following Resolution was ado~ted: WHEREAS, the proposed Upper Ne\·;port Bay Wa tcr Quality Planning Study was continued by this Board from Septc~b~r 2, 1975 to October 7, 1975 to enable Supervisor Riley to meet with ~he a~propriate and affecteJ agencies to deternine their input and ~eco~.mendations, WHEREAS, such a meeting was held on September 8, 1975 resulting in the following proposed modifications of the Upper ~1ewport Bay Water Quality Planning Study: 1. The County should assume the lead responsibility for the joint powers agency. Toward this end it appears desirable for t!"le Ef.lA to pro- vide staff for this purpose and for the County Counsel to provide legal counsel for the agency. of Newport Beach, Irvine, and any other watershed city wishing to joir., the J.rvine Ranch i·1ater District, County Sanitation District ~~o. 5, the Orange County Water District, end the Departnent of Fish and Game. While the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board membership is desirable, it is unkr.own whether or not it is legally possible. If legal representatio~ on the agency is not possible, it is cx~ected that the regional board would still play an important role in the conduct of the studies. I 3. Staff capabilit~es and expertise of all agencies should be r;,ade; available to the agency en an "as-needed" basis. It is hoped that such sharing of staff will help reduce the need for outside consultants. 4. The work program should have a shorter time frame than the origin~! proposal of five years. Ill Ill Rc~olution No. 75-1431 Proposed Modifications to AGENDA ITEM #34 -DISTRICT 5 · l~oHport Bay i·? .. 1tcr Quality Pl\urnin9 I I I I I I "Z-1" .J > Ioli-...... z 0 z ::> :> 0 Ill 0 u t,) u i: > ~ ...... z o;, ! ~ ~ S. The agency should also provide a forum ior cooperative planning 2 of rehabilitation programs for the Upper Bay, including possible pilot 3 dredging programs. 4 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED th. h d :1 • f . . I at t e above propose mori 1cat1ons; I 5 of the Upper New-port Bay Water Quality Planning Study are referred to the 6 Director of the Environmental Management Agency, County Counsel and the 7 rnembers!"lip of the Newport-Irvine Waste Manager.1ent Planning Agency· (NIWA.) to 8 incorporate the modifications into the program and report back to this 9 Board with the understanding that neither the joint powers agency nor the 10 County of Orange will make contributions to dredging the Back Bay. 11 12 13 ·14 15 161 17 I --.. l~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 . ,:> AYES: SUPERVISORS THO~L-::\.S F. RILEY, R.~LPH B. CLARK, ROBERT ~·~. BATTI:J, LAURENCE J. SCH?HT AND R.c'\LPH A. DIEDRICH UOES:. SUPERVISORS NONE ABSENT: SUPERVISORS ~JO~'!E STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, WILLIAM E. ST JOHN, County Clerk nnd ex-officio Board of Sup2rvisor8 of Oran~e County, California, her~by the nbovc and foregoing R23olution -;;~s duly and r~gulnrly said Board at a regular ra2eting thereof held on the /~h 0c~ob2r , 19 7 S , and passed by a u:~~r:i:-.~m::. said Hoard IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I day of Octote~ ----7th Clerk of the c~rtify thnt .:idopted by thQ day of vote of t OIU-12 @ "Z-2" AGEtmA ITEM f~34 -DISTRICT 5 "Z-2" . ft' CONSTRUCTION -PROGRESS REPORTS OCT OBER 3 1, 1 9 7 5 11 .• . " ENGINEERI NG DEPART:MENT SL.u°"'E 'SL..1D £ GAT E;~ -~E::D BLOWER __ ,.... I BIJILDJ/.JG "'.":'" . ~ I JO q 8 r . . . ' J pJSTAL.Le:.D ~Al~/IJr;; 1/IJ ST A U..A TI O N C.0/IJT I~ l.U:".S ... D/GE~TEl<f 5 4 3 2 I . . AERATJ.ON BASIN~ I "£r-j...PWe .fZ. l-E V E..L ~ AAJ /.!A t ~ z I 4 3 6 5 8 ,, 10 'J 12 JI 14 13 ' ... fEtONDAR Y \CL ARIF/ERS \_ D ec~ ~vt:L.. cofl)c.e.~;e. IN PtACi! C£/\.J 'f'8.~ 51!:C.TJ ~ f'1PJrJGr LA 11.JO F'...S?.WJ\Y 50 MG D ACTIVATED SLUDGE CONTRACT NO. P1 -16 •, C 0 l\J TRACT N 0. P 1 -1 6 SO MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT Donovan Construction Company of Minnesota, Contractor STARTING DATE: June 27' 1974 CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 14' 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 30 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMP LET ION DATE: Jan. 13' 19 77 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $29, 876, 000. 00 • PA I 0 TO DATE: $ 21, 3 31, 3 0 7. 4 8 • Contract is for the construction of Activated tirith Plant No. 2 effluent at the outfaZl booster station, improving the overall quality of water pumped through the outfall system into the ocean. Sludge secondary treatment faci Zities at Plant No. l. The new faci'lities UJiU aid the Districts in meeting rra.ndated State and Federa Z ocean discharge requirements. When completed, the secondary treatment system lAJill process the 50 mgd of wastewater flowing through PZant No. 1. The effluent wiZZ then blend Significant structures included in the contract are the Blower Building, Aeration Basins, Second- ary Clarifiers, wo Digestern, Waste Sludge Thick- eners and the POl.Jer Building. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Much of the activity this month centers around equipment deliveries and mechanical and electrical installationso Walls on the Blower Building are complete with only three sections remaining to be placedo Both 1~00 horsepower hlower engines have been delivered and are stored next to the existing trickling filters. One of the turbine-generator units for emergency power generation is ready for installationo The outside concrete guard rail wall is being installed on the Aeration Basins. Air and sludge piping is being placed along with slide gates for the sludge channels between the basins. The influent area is structurally completeo Piping is being installed in the center gallery of the Secondary Clarifierso Concrete crossbeams are in place and mechanical work in the return sludge pump station is underway. The contractor plans to begin construction of the Power Building roof this month. Steel baffles have been installed in the basins of the Waste Sludge Thickenerso All the walls are in place with concrete work continuing on the parapet areas. The Digester bridges and stairs have been installed and placing of the hand railing is continuingo Electrical trays and conduits are being installed in all tunnel and basement areaso ~~~~WERt--~~~~ ~ L---------------1 JPL ACTS PROCESS PLANT JOB N2 PW~ 045 ( ~-----1 I I c.H~rcti. L -__ ~~ I Arz..EA l I 1~~1r --- ~A I L _ -- ( CONTRACT PW-045 JPL-ACTS PROCESS PLANT J. Putnam Hcnck, A Corporation & Henck Pro, A Joint Venture, Contractor STARTING DATE: Oct. 1, 1975 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: * ~AID TO DATE: C orLt!ta.c.,t L!l 6 o Jt c.o n~ .tJt.u.ct<.o n o 6 a. one. mi.lUo n g a1. - lo n pelt day p.<_lo t wa.o.te.wa.te. 't. tlc.e.a:tme.nt plant a.t W~tewa.teJt. foe.ai:men-t Pl:mt No. 2. The. pla.n;t w,i.,U u.&e. a. wU.que Ac.ti..va.ted CaJtbon TJteJLtm.z.nt. Syl;~ern (ACTS J de. v el.oped by :the N a.tio nai. AeJW ru::.JLti.CA and Spa.c.e. Agenc.y' !; J e.t PMpui..6-i.on Laboaltto!tLJ. TYU.6 .tJte.atme.n.t method WM pe.Jt6ed.e.d -i.J1 U..6 e.xpe!Umenta.i .6.tagu w<.tJi a. mobile. :t~ e.a/tch UYLil. opeJULte.d by JP L pelLhonnel a..t the V.Ll.tJUw' Wa.o.teu:a.te/r.. T Jte.axme.nt. Pla.n.:t No. 1 .ln Fou.n.:ta..in. Vall.e.y d.wUng 1974-75. The l;ljl;tem LU> ed ~lu.dge Jtemove.d 6Mm .the. wa.&.tewa.te.Jt t1J pllodu.c.e. a.W..va..te.d M-'tbcn tJvwu.gh a ptpwly!;,W Jte.actoJt. The cu::tlva.:t.e.d c.cvr.bon -i.o tJ1en Jt<Un:t'W- duc.e.d .into the wM.tewa..te.Jt l;t:/f.eam .01 a !; e.c.onda.Juj JJ.taBe 60Jt addlU.ona.l ,.r..ernoval. o 6 pcliu,t.a.;1.U. Orth/ p<VLti.all.y ~ e.ri a.M.e.Jt .the. .Hcond -6.ta.qe.. iJ1e. aw:va- CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 2 8' 19 7 6 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 28, 1976 t.e.d c.aJr.bon and ~ ec.ondM.y -6ludge. l;lUJUr.1_( ,£!; 6e.d hi.-t.o the. .ln c.o mi.ng Wa.6 .t ewa.:t.vr.. !; .t!te.am to .lncJr..e M e. !; y l; tern e. 6 ii-ci.. e.J1CJ.j • The. mobile. e.xpe.M.me.nt.ai. wU..t ~ ed :t.c 1te.&£ne :tlUJ., 4y,e,tem 6Jtam la.bolta.:t.o!U.J be.nch e.xpv-i-lmeri..U WM ba,tch opvuit.e.d wUh me.cJiaiuc.al. handU.ng o 6 ma.te.ucJ: ~tr.cm .6ta.ge. to ,e,ta.ge.. The. p.il.ot pi.ruit W-i..ll.. be. a. c.ontin- u.o wd.y Jt.U.YL, a.LLt.o mated .6 yf> .t e.m. Ah-a. p!Ume. obje.dlve. on .the. ACTS, il. c.oul.d .6olve. a.n .lnCJt~.lng pJtcblem 06 .6fudge cliApc-6a.l ~ :tJU-6 1111.te/L.lai be.come.Ji mcJte. p.f.enti Sui ~h .lm!=Jrove.d wa.6.tWa-teJL t.Jc.e.atme.n.t o.nd -i.n0te.rue.d 6.lolC.L In ad.- di.Lum, .:the. e. 6 6lue.Ji.,t 6Jtom :t.JU,~ .t:i.e.CLt.me.;t-t !; tJ.6 :t.e.m ,£!; e.:Q:Je.cte.d to me.et the. clW cno.Jtg c. ,'{_~ lU.'t.e.mervt~ 0 ri the. 0.l~tti/ .. c:Ll' N.P.D.E.S. PV'.!r.il. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Work is progressing on schedule. Contractor has nearly completed primary and secondary clarifiers. Foundation slabs for the influent pump station, sludge pump station, electrical building and filter press building are in place. The filter press and electrical buildings are partially complete. Delivery of the filter press is scheduled for November 2nd. Above ground piping and installation of the pump station clearwell has begun. Underground piping, tank construction and calciner building fabrication is scheduled for November. *~h-<A ~.on..:t.Juic.t ~ a. de.~.lgn and con~:t.Jiuct co1it)[ac.t wfte!.Jc.eby .t/ie c.011.:t.Ji.ac;tOJt .U pcud $50, 000. 00 µla.~ .the. a.c.:tLutl coJto 60JL ail fabOJt and ma.tc.'Li.ail;. DI ST. 2 CONTRACT No. 2-15 r ~ BLVD. ~ -~e. •?"'J;!.>!r'o ~.,._...-, ,~ -CU v1r-~11'"1 IVfV ~ \!) ~ C.AL STATE F'ULLE. RTON C'( CAMPU5 ~ CONTRACT No. 2-15 YORBA LINDA PUMP STATION J. Putnam Benck, A Corporation ~ Hcnck Pro, A Joint Venture, Contractor START! NG DATE: ORIGINAL CONTRACT: • PA I D TO DATE : Sept. 26, 1974 $671,146.oo $484,345.90 _. Controct ic ·for the construction of a reinforced concrete structure to house wet z..ie lls and pwr.ps for t2unsfe21 ring tributar-::1 UXJ.stewater thmugh a force 111'.lin line into the Sa:nta Ana River, Carbon CatnJOn Inte21 ceptor-reUef Trunk Line system for conveyance to f-lastewater Reclamation Plant Noo 1 in Fountain VaUey. 1'his wi ZZ asnist in re Ueving the presently congested Ne-~hope-Placentia Trunk Line a:nd will serve proposed land use development of the tributary area to the year 2010. The pvmp station structure is located at the in- tersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associa:ted Road in Fullerton. It is being constructed on CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 22, 1975 TI ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 15 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 7, 1975 what L.'as originally University of Califoyr;~ia, Fu7- lerton prope11 ty at the northern perimeter of Uze caTTP~us. Special arrangen:cmts were rradc 1,_~itl; thr Univerdty for use of the property. The above-ground portion of the structure wi ZZ be a low profile slab 85' x 109', 2 feet above ground. The deepest portion of the strv.cture '/.;.,1Hl be 35 feet under ihe grouni. The District has agreed to construct a slump-stone fence a~ound the structure and landscape the area in accordance tJr: th future compatible use by the Vniversi ty. The University plans to construct an arboretur.-: in the irronediate area at some future date. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH CiJ.iU input lines has been completed and traffic restored to normal on Associated Road and Yorba Linda Blvd. ., r-" ..L :J Electrical conduit installation is now 75 percent completeo Some power wiring has been installed. Contractor is backfilling on the north and west sides of the structure bringing the area back to ground levelo Station flow meter has been installedo The three water pumps have been delivered and are in the structureo Construction on the output manifold piping from the pumps has begun. Delivery date of the two remaining pump motors is still undetermined. According to the supplier, they are in transit, but their immediate whereabouts is unknowno BIRCH 5T. IMPERIAL l-IWY. • GOLDEN AVE. BA~TANCHVRY KD. ----- DI ST._2 ----COMPLETE -.., .. TO BE CONSTRUCTED CONTRACT No. 2-16-1 CONTRACT No. 2-16-1 KRAEMER BOULEVARD INTERCEPTOR SEv/ER, FROM PALM DRIVE TO IMPERIAL HIGHWAY George Miller Construction Company, Contractor STARTING DATE: ORIGINAL CONTRACT: PAID TO DATE: April 24, 19 75 $563,936.80 $602,899.10 Contract is for insta'lZation of 24" and 21" Vi tri- · fied Clay Pipe (V.C.P.) along Kraemer Bou'levard from Palm Drive in Placentia to Imperial HiglUJay in Brea, wi approxima.te distance of 1. 5 miles. This project is part of the Santa Ana River, Cara- bon Canyon Interceptor-re'lief system, designed, in part, to divert fwws from the north portion of District 2, relieving the presently congested New- hope-P'lacentia Trunk 'line to Waste?.Jater Rec'lcona- CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 21, 1975 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 21, 1975 tion Plant No. 1 in Fountain VaUey. The southcr- 'ly terminus of the interceptor-relief system is at the diveraion structure at Plant No. 1. The KI'aemer Boulevard Interceptor portion of the interceptor-relief .system is designed to har.dle flows up to 25 mi Zlion gaUons per day and wi U serve the proposed land use devewpment in the tributary area to the year 2010. ACTIVITIES.DURING THE PAST MONTH CONTRACT C 0 M P L E T E DI ST. 3 COMPLETE ---To BE . CONSTRU CONTRACT No. 3-20-1 N CTED CONTRACT No.3-20-1 KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 5 AND 6 Sully-Miller Contracting Company, Contractor STARTING DATE: ORIGINAL CONTRACT: • PAID TO DATE: Oct. 31, 1974 $4,602,992.00 $4,047,953.00 . Contract is for instaz:lation of a 66" Reinforced Concrete Pipe (R.C.P.) trwzk line from the inter- .section of Goldeni.Jest Street and Westminster Ave- nue in Westminster to 1200 feet south of KateZZa Avenue on Knott Avenue in Stanton, a distance of appro:x:im::zte Zy 2. 8 mi Zes. Knott Avenue is the northern extension of Goldeni.Jest Street. Tlzis project is a portion of the }{no tt Interceptor relief system designed to relieve the presently congested Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer by intercep- CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 31, 1975 TI ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 31, 1975 ting fZO!.Js from the nort'fz.u.Jest portion of District 3. The southerly terrminus of the system is at the intersection of Brookhurst Street and Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley. It wi 7,7, eventuaZZy extend to Imperial Avenv.e in La Habra. This portion of the ·relief system is designed to handle a flow of '?5 million gallons per day and rviZZ serve ·the proposed developed Zand use plan in the tributary area to the yeca 2010. ACTIVI~IES DURING THE PAST MONTH Contractor laid 1465 feet of pipe during the month of October. He has now run out of pipe on hand and discontinued trenching due to a labor strike at the supplier, Ameron Pipe Coo The pipe company has been on strike for three weeks at the time of. this reporto Thirteen hundred feet of pipe remain to be installed from where the contractor left off to the end of the jobo Contractor estimates he can be laying pipe within two weeks after settle- ment of the supplier's strike. He estimated completion of pipe laying to the project end within one and one-half months after termination of the strikeo Three construction pits are now in Knott Ave. Two, one south of Chapman Aveo and one south of Belgrave Aveo, are for con- structing dog-leg structures in the line. The one south of Belgrave is nearing completiono The third pit is for construction of a junction box immediately south of Lampson Aveo This project is nearing completiono The contractor is concentrating on compacting, grading and paving to restore Knott Aveo up to Orangewood Aveo as much as possible to normal traffic flow during this interim periodo Most of Knott Ave. north of the Garden Grove Freeway is experiencing no traffic difficultieso JI'-----~L INCO~/.N ---JI l.____~AVE ______ . ----'I L RANGE CERRITO.$ CITY tJF ~. P. DI ST. 3 CYPRES S --.coMPLE'I1E AT.E LLA 1.n ms -TO BE CON STRUC TED CO N TR AC T N o. 3-20-2 CITV OF ANAl-IEIM OLINDA AV£. A VE. ~- .G VRA CUSE AVE. N r\ .. 1.· CONTRACT No. 3-20-2 KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 7 A. G~ Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Co., A Joint Venture, Contractor STARTING DATE: March 6, 1975 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $3,876,870.00 PAI 0 TO DATE: $2,264,736.oo "contract is for instal.lation of a Reinforced Con- crete Pipe (R.C.P.) sewer line from a point 1200 feet south of Kate Ua Avenue on Knott Avenue in Stanton, north on Knott Avenue to Lincoln Avenue in Anaheim, a distance of 2. 3 miies. Pipe diame- "i·"'rs are 72 11 for the first 3, 900 feet, 63" for f, too feet and 66" for the re1r.aining 1200 feet of i. he pmj ect. nows from this reach wi l Z drain in- to Contract 3-20-1 to the south. This project is a portion of the Knott Interceptor reZief system designed to relieve the presently CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: March 6, 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: March 6, 1976 congested Miller-Holder Trur1.k Ser.Jer by intercep- ting f'lowD from the north.Jest portion of District 3. The southerly terminus of the system is at the intersection of Brookhurst Street and Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley. It wiU eventuaUy extend to Imperial Avenue in La. 'Habra. This portion of the relief system is designed to handle a flow of 68 million gallons per ckrd and LJiil serve the pmposed developed land use pl.an in the tributary area to the year 2010. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Contractor laid 1102 feet of pipe during October. He has passed Ball Road and is about 600 feet north on Knott Avenue with his heading. A bore pit has been dug at the intersection of Knott Ave. and Orange Ave. to facilitate an eight-inch boring diagonally across the intersection and con- nection of a bypass from an existing sewer line through a manhole structure that will be constructed where the bore-pit iso The contractor has encountered poor trenching conditions north of Ball Road due to the dry sand sub-strata, requiring a wider trench and slower progress than desired. The wider trench also makes traffic diversion difficult. District staff is conferring with the City of Anaheim on the advisability of closing down the section of Knott Ave. between Ball Road and Orange Ave. to all but local traffic to speed up the work. It is anticipated the contractor can reach and pass the Orange Aveo, Knott Ave. intersection by the first week in December if street closure is allowed, or by the first week in January if it is noto A District representative has visited all the shops in the shopping center at the intersection of Orange Ave. and Knott Ave. and explained the scope of construction work and scheduling to owners/managers of the businesses. Contractor successfully laid the 24" sewer to the junction structure in the middle of the intersection of Knott Ave. and Katella Ave. and the 36'' flood control line that rounds the intersection corner heading north during October. A break in an 8" water line adjacent to the work site November 27th necessi- tated closing the intersection for a dayo Restricted traffic will be neces- sary into the first week in November while repairs are being made, compaction ._.,,insured and the intersection repavedo _ :..k'ATELlA AV£_ : ••·-·•·Lf•• ~,;~1, ·~r .;;..:-~ - ••----..... FARGt.JJ.IAK AVE. .___ Ol?ANGEWOOD AVE. "' ~ .... ..... ~ ~ .. ~fll 1;.._1 _W_Y. _ -----1 I "' e \) I . ~-~ , .. ~ ~: q,.o~ o.tt:f-»{'4'\~V.. : ""' . BRADBURY :..__K_D. __ DI ST. 3 -~COMPLETE -.... TO BE CONSTRUCTED CONTRA.CT No. 3 -21 -1 ---------;------ • --.1 I m I CONTRACT No. 3 -21 -1 WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 25, 26 & PORTION OF 27 A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Company, A Joint Venture, Contractor STARTING DATE: June 2 6' 1975 ~ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $1, 416, 448 .00 CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 22, 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 C~lendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 22, 1976 PAID TO DATE: $994,461.07 Contract is for the installation of a Vitrified Clay Pipe (V.C.P.) sewer from the vicinity of the District's Westside Lift Station, 1800 feet west of Seal Beach Boulevard and Lampson Avenue along the flood control channel, along the channel to Seal Beach Boulevarid where it turns north along Los Alamitos BoulevaI'd (the northern extension of Seal Beach Boulevard) to Katella Avenue. It then turns east on Katella to Lexington Drive, where it tenninates. Pipe diameter is 39" for the first f>, f>OO feet, 36" for the next 5, 700 feet and 30" for the final 5, 200 feet. Total length is approx- im:i.te ly 3.1 miles. tion of Seat Beach Boulevard and Westminster Ave- nue in the City of Seal Beach. Tri.e system will eventually run generally in a northerly direction through the ZJestern portion of District 3 and ZJill terminate at Cresent.Avenue and Moody Street in the City of La Palnu. Upon corrpletion, the system will relieve the Los Alamitos Subtrunk Sewer ZJhich, at present, fur.c- tions as the main interceptor sewer for the West- side basin and, for the most part, is c:urrently flCMing at or near peak capacity. This portfon of the relief interceptor is designed to handle flows of up to 14.'l miUion gallons per day and will serve the proposed developed Zand use plan in the tributary area to the yea:r 2010. This project is a continuation of the Westside Relief Interceptor sewer which begins at the Seal Beach Boulevard Pwrrping Station at the intersec- ... ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Contractor laid 5620 feet of pipe during the month. The northern· portion of the job through the City of Los Alamitos is essentially complete from Rossmoor Way, north on Los Alamitos Blvdo to Katella · Aveo and east on Katella to Lexington Dro All that remains in this section is completion of a bore hole across Katella Ave. and con- struction of a manhole on the other side of the street at the ter- minus of the job. This will be completed by Deco 1 to be out of the way of race track traffic which begins Deco 2. On the southern heading in Seal Beach, the contractor has laid pipe across the Bixby Ranch property along the flood control channel and is now proceeding north on Seal Beach Blvdo in front of the Rossmoor Shopping Center. Traffic in this section has been diverted to the west side of the street and restricted to one lane north and south. The street has been restriped to allow left-turn pockets into each of the shopping center entranceso A Sanitation District representative has visited each of the stores in the center and explained the construction work, its pur)ose and the work sch~dule to owners/managerso The contractor is working ten-hour work days to expedite completion of this stretch and minimize the affect on businesses within the center. He.is anticipated to be past the center and traffic restored to normal by the first week in December. FAIRHAVEN AVE..._ N • , . D\ST. 7 -m COMPLETE -.--TO BE CONSTRUCTED -coNTRACT No.1-6-7 __ 1_n_v1=N=£==~ CONTRACT No.7-6-7 TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, REACH 11 & PORTION OF 12 Rogers & Davies, Contractor STARTING DATE: May 29, 1975 CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Nov. 25, 1975 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $ 3~9, 818. 00 TI ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PAID TO DATE: ~ $348,626.00 PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Nov. 25, 1975 Contract is for the installation of 1. 7 miles of ''Vitrified CZay Pipe (V. C. P.). The project starts This project is part of the m:ister-p lanr:.ed Tustir.- Orange Trwzk Lir..e Relief system. It i.,.,'>i, zi eventu- ally extend north to ViZla.·Park Road and Santia~~ Boulevard in Orange, proviaing drainage for the central and northern portions of District 7. at the intersection of Irvine Boulevard and Nez,;- port Avenue in Tustin and goes north along the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-wcy to 17th Street in County territory. It continues north in Esplanade Avenue to Fairhaven Avenue, where it tiwns east for 100 feet and terminates o Pipe dia- meter is 24" for the first ?, 000 feet of the pro- ject. The remaining pipe is 21" in diameter. This section of the system is designed to handle flows up to 9. 6 4 mi Z Zion gal Zons per da.y and wi Zl serve proposed land use development of the tribu- ta.ry area to the year 2010. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH SUMMARY TREATMENT PLANT WORK Total Value Under Contract $29,876,000 $29,876,000 Total Work to Date 21,331,307 Total Work During October 1,829,022 DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK Total Value Under Contract $19,536,630 $19,536,630 Total Work to Date 8,743,003 Total Work During October 1,294,697 Total Work Awaiting Award 2,116,676 2,116,676 TOTAL AMOUNT UNDER CONTRACT AND AWAITING AWARD $51,529,306 \ , November 7, 1975 Members present : Members absent: Others present: Staff present : REPORT OF ntE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Meeting Date : October 23, 1975 5:3o ·p .m. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFO RN IA P.O . BOX 8127 I 0 844 ELLIS A V EN UE FO UN T A IN V ALLEY, CALIFO RN I A 92708 (71 4 ) 5 40 -2910 (714 ) 9 62-2411 Donald Winn, Joint Chairman, Phillip Cox, Don Mc!nnis, John Store, John Garthe, Laurence Schmit, Robin Young, Vernon Evans Norma Brandel Gibbs, Vice Joint Chairman, Michael Callahan, Kerm Rima Harvey Hunt, John Carollo Engineers, Walt Howard, John Carollo Engineers, Thomas L. Woodruff Fred A. Harper, General Manager, Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer, J . Wayne Sylvester, Director of Finance Convened: Adjourned: 5:30 p.m. 7:15 p.m. * * * * * * * * * * The Executive Committee met to review the progress of the preparation of the Districts' Facilities Plan and Environmental Impact Statement for improved treatment and the status of the construction of the 1-MGD JPL Activated Carbon Treatment process unit. Following a discussion of the progress to date and revi ew of alternative plans presented by the staff, the Committee directed the staff to request a meeting of the State Water Resources Control Board and Environmental Protection Agency officials with the Executive Committee to receive their views on the staff's suggested alternatives. Attached is a staff memorandwn outlining alternativ es which will be considered at the meeting. (The Executive Committee i s scheduled to meet with the representatives of the State Water Resources Control Board and the Environmental Protection Agency on November 25th , at ·10 :30 A.M. at the Newport Beach Marriott Hotel.) MEMORANDUM October 23, 1975 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (71 '4) 962-2411 SUBJECT: Status of Step I Grant -Facilities Plan and Environmental Impact Stateme.nt for Improved Treatment of the Joint Facilities At a special Board Meeting in March of this year, ·staff presented to the Boards scheduling· for preparation of a Facilities Plan and Environmental Impact Statement for Improved ~reatment at the Joint Facilities which included the construction of a 1-MGD JPL Activated Carbon Treatment System for the purpose of the evaluation of the p::::Tfon}1ance and the cost effectiveness of this new \\'ast0 t:rcatment nrocess. The schedule presented to the Boards and as shown on the attached chart .... delineates, by colored arrow, certain key decision points that must be made in order that the Distl'icts will be eligible to share in the State and Federal funding prior to the expiration of these funds on September 30, 1977. This status report is to inform you and the Boards that the construction and the anticipated operation of the 1-MGD activated carbon process is on schedule as presented, and barring any unforeseen delays, sufficient operational data should be available by February 1, 1976 to make the decision of whether to continue with the .JPL process or to abandon the process and proceed to meet our requirements employing conventional processes. Because of the magnitude of the improved treatment program which.has been estimated between $200 and $300 million, and since that commitment by the State and Environmental Protection Agency for grant funds must be made on or before September 30, 1977, I feel it is only prudent that we reexamine our ~nplcmentation of this schedule in the event other courses of action may develop which would be to the advantage of the Districts. Some of the alternatives that should be discussed arc as follows: A. Double Tracking Design Concept This procedure would direct the engineer to commence concurrent design on both the JPL-ACTS Process and the Conventional Treatment Process for required facilities at Plant No. 2. The Step I Grant which was received in March of this year authorized this "double tracking'1 for design if necessary in· an amount not to ex~ced $350,000. There docs appear to be a need for clarifi- cation from the State and EPA whether the Facilities Plan and Environmental Impact Statement need to be completed prior to commencing of any design for any type of facility. Tiie double To: Fred A. Harper October 23, 1975 Page Two· tracking design procedure would allow sufficient time to receive concept approval for grant monies prior to September 30, 1977. It would require design of facilities that may not be used and~ therefore, a loss of engineering time and monies associated therewith. 0 B. Two-Stage Facilities Approach This alternate would require a portion of the total 175-MGD of improved treatment at Plant No. 2 to be constructed by the utilization of conventional treatment processes. If the Districts' consultants preparing the Facilities Plan and Environmental Impact Statement were directed to prepare "mini reports"_which included a.report for 50-75 MGD improved treatment for activated sludge at " Plant No. 2, and an Envi:conrnental Impact Report was prepared concurrently, the State and EPA could conceivably declare a negative declaration on this phase of improved treatment and subsequently give concept approval to this first phase of additions' at. Plant No. 2. Redirecting the consultants to prepare these ,.~. "mini reports" could delay the final preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement and Facilities Plan for a period of approximately 60-days, but it would have the advantage that it would allow more ·time for the operation and evaluation of the JPL-ACTS Process. -~- It is the staff's understanding that no additional facilities for capacity can be commenced until the completion of the Environmental Impact Statement. The Alternate B presented above will delay the final preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement, ·but could allow the Districts to proceed in a more orderly manner as far as improved tre_atment at Plant No. 2. It docs appear advisable at this time that members of the Boards meet with the top executives of the State and Envirorunental Protection Agency" along with staff to discuss these al te111atives. A similar meeting was held in December, 1974 which did prove to be very informative and beneficial to both parties. It is my personal recommendation that a meeting be set as soon as possible, perhaps sometime.in the later part of November, in order that the Boards may have sufficient time at the December Board Meeting to redirect the scheduling if it is necessary. REL:hje . •. 1 .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SCHEDULING FOR IMPROVED 'TREATMENT . · I I I I -I AUTHORIZE E .l.S. FACILITIES PLAN JPL PILOT WORK I I I I J I SUBMIT E.l.S . ANO FACILITIES PLAN MAFtCH 1974 ---I FACILITIES PLAN*:----'~, DECISI~: ~:~UIRED I .__ _______ --J I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I SUBMIT PLANS ANO SPECIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVED TREATMENT • I PILOT Al R AND I I 0E s 1 GN oF SECONDARY I I REVIEW a I 1 1 CONSTRUCTION ........ 1-+41 OXYGEN A .s . 1M--+~~L ..... -411o--.+--+--·-I TR EAT ME NT li--;-~•)-'41o-41e1001 No ,-........... ~~-:. _____ _ , ~,.,,.J,.LL '~"°' ~· j •rnn I : L}"J' 1 • I I , I I I s 1 TATl£MEI NTI 1 1 11 • 1 JPI. TESTING ~E;~·1 c~101:11~POUNDEO • _"_j OE SIGN AND CONSTRUCT __ __.._ ... O_P_E_R_A._T_E -~-- 4 n JPL PILOT PLANT PILOT PL :~ FUNDS MUST BE ALLOCATED *FACILITIES PLAN. TO INCLUDE TWO RECOMM E NDED PLANS JPL AND CONVENTIONAL A .S. l I I I I I I -I I .& ' M A M J J A 9 0 N Q J f M A M J J A S 0 N D .I ,..-• A M J J A I 0 N D 1175 19TT REPORT OE THE JOINT CHAIRMAN MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WILL BE MEETING NOVEMBER 25TH WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF THE REGIONAL EPA OFFICE AND THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD TO REVIEW THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PREPARATION OF THE DISTRICTS' FACILITIES PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR IMPROVED TREATMENT. AT THAT TIME, WE WILL EXPLORE SOME ALTERNATE PLANS WHICH HAVE BEEN PRESENTED BY THE STAFF. THE COMMITTEE'S MAJOR CONCERN IS THAT 62~ MILLION IN GRANT FUNDS WHICH ARE EARMARKED FOR OUR DISTRICTS FOR IMPROVED TREATMENT ARE NOT LOST BECAUSE OF DELAYS WHICH COULD RESULT FROM OUR EFFORTS TO PROVE OUT THE JPL SYSTEM. WE WANT EPA's VIEWS ON SOME POSSIBLE ALTERNATE APPROACHES TO SPEEDING UP ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION AT THE TREATMENT WORKS. THE COMMITTEE WILL BE REPORTING TO THE BOARDS ON' OUR MEETING WITH STATE AND FEDERAL PEOPLE AS WELL AS OTHER MATTERS AT THE DECEMBER BOARD MEETING. • AGENDA ITEM 2L_ S T A F F REPORT November 6, 1975 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 I 0844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 Acquisition of Right-of-Way for Santa Ana River Interceptor Contracts 2-41-4 & 2-14-5 Mr. Carl Boznanski of Donahue and Co., Inc. has transmitted copies of the preliminary appraisal pursuant to the Board's authorization. The preliminary appraisal, which includes the acquisition of the permanent easement, utilization of the temporary construction easements, removals and replacement of citrus trees and the loss of income from the prohibition of agricultural activities, has been estimated at approximately $100,000. This preliminary appraisal does not include acquisition of the surface rights. Prior to the employment of the appraiser, the staff was in contact with the County Parks and Trails personnel to pursue a cooperative effort in the event that a joint use of the right-of-way could be made by both the Sanitation District and the County Parks and Trails Department. The Parks and Trails Department has transmitted to the staff a map delineating those reaches of the sewer right-of-way which could be considered for joint use. The staff did not instruct the appraiser to consider acquisition of the surface rights because of the timing and other agendes affected, namely the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, the State Water Resources Control Board and the Environmental Protection Agency. The staff will continue to work with the Parks and Trails Department, but would like direction from the Board regarding acquisition of surface rights. Some of the general evaluation comments made by the appraiser are as follows: No consideration in the study was given to the conversion of the permanent easement area to one "in fee" which could be utilized for horse or bicycle trails. This restriction would increase the total acquisition cost several thousands of dollars. Such a use could have impacts in regard to substantial severance damage because of the physical severing of access from one portion of the larger parcel to another • In the evaluation of damages, the appraiser assumed that all roads, fences, irrigation slopes and irrigation systems are to be replaced in kind by the general contractor subsequent to the installation of the sewer facilities. These provisions are covered in the contract documents at this time. No damages were assessed for these purposes. Specific valuation of ingress and egress rights to the metering station to be located at the County line on the Green Acres Golf Course property was not made since the staff indicated to the appraiser that such rights shall be agreed upon separately. Staff Report November 6, 1975 The appraiser met with both the major property owners and some of the conversations with same are: Mr. Ernest Bryant He does not want to have to deal with contractors separately on the easement areas. He wants to deal with the District only. He is concerned with the replacement of all roads that are to be interfered with. On Plate 28 of the Plan and Profile, Contract 2-·14-4, he says that there is a 6" water pipe, now shown, that crosses the right-of-way. He was concerned with the continuation of irrigation during the project. He mentioned the need for runoff irrigation on Plates 23 and 28. On Plate 26, he mentioned the well at the east end and the need to watch out for it during construction. He was concerned with the removal of large trees which serve as a neces- sary wind break. Mr. Terry, Manager, Santa Ana Valley Irrigation Company On Plate 8 of Contract 2-14-5, he was concerned with the protection to the well and pump. The main paved road, along which the sewer is to run, must be replaced. The elevated manholes might pose a problem unless the road is offset from its present alignment. He suggested that during construction a secondary access road, along the old canal, be partially repaved so as to provide ingress and egress for two of the tenants that reside on the property. He also mentioned that he would like to see the canal filled in with some of the excess dirt. He was concerned with interruption of the picking season which ends in early October. The Weir Canyon property is presently being run by a Mr. Warren Hillebrecht. The Green River property is under a long term lease with Mr. Hank Bickler and those property matters will have to be handled through him. -2- Staff Report November 6, 1975 The permanent easement area is 30-feet in width with the sewer offset in the event that additional facilities are needed at some time in the future. This width is a minimum width which is required for maintenance of the facility. Property owners will be allowed to utilize the surface area of this permanent easement. The permanent ~~sement area in the Bryant properties is approximately 10-1/4 acres and that property owned by Santa Ana Valley Irrigation Company is 3.23 acres and 1.9 acres in the Green River Golf Course area. Additional right-of-way is required for temporary construction purposes which totals 26.42 acres. REL:hje -3- November 7, 1975 CouNTY SANITATION D1s1 Ri\. of ORANGE COUNTY, CAL1FOr1:· P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 927C, (71.C) 540-2910 (71.C) 962-2411 STAFF REPORT ON "208" PLANNING FOR-THE SOUTH COAST AREA In April, the State Board held a hearing in Los Angeles on "208" Planning and determined that there was little local support for a single designation for the entire South Coast Area. Therefore, the Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, and Riverside County areas continued to carry the State Board's earlier decision of "non designation". Subsequently, a District of Columbia court ruled that 208 Planning must be accomplished throughout the United States and that the State was to do the planning in the non designated areas. This court decision may have prompted the State Board to send out a notice dated .August 4th~ expressing their intent to pursue the establishment of one or more 208 pl~nning areas in the South Coast Area. On August 15th, your General Manager, in concert with the City Engineer of the City of Los Angeles and the General Manager of the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, re- sponded to the Executive Officer of the State Water Resources Control Board, suggesting a Joint Powers Agency comprised of the Clty of Los Angeles, the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles, ourselves, and similar agencies with jurisdictional responsibilities outside the boundaries of the three major agencies. Attached is a copy of the August 15th joint letter to the Executive Officer of the State Board, and his "response" dated October 29th. Also enclosed is a copy of EPA's areawide waste treatment planning pamphlet which describes the purpose of "208" planning. The State Board staff has indicated that through the develop- ment of their basin plans and other regional water quality planning efforts, substantial water quality control problems in this area are lacking. In our opinion, this would indicate that a 208 Planning Agency is not required · On November 17th, the State Water Resources Control Board will conduct a public hearing in Los Angeles to receive testimony to determine if any part of the South Coast Area should be - designated as an areawide waste treatment management planning area and the appropriate planning agency(s) to conduct the work. We believe the emphasis of the 208 planning effort in the South Coast Area will be on air quality matters, land use, and transportation, and their relationships to existing water quality improvement plans. Because of the far-reaching ramifications I this program may have on our efforts, we have invited Mr. Bill ........- Davis, in charge of 208 planning for the State Board, and Mr. James Anderson, Executive Officer of the Regional Water Quality Control Board, to attend Wednesday's Board meeting to more fully inform the Board. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) has been actively seeking the designation for the South Coast Area. Their Executive Director, Mr. Ray Remy, has had dis- cussions with the Los Angeles City Engineer, the Manager of the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, and myself, as to our roles in the event SCAG would be designated by the State and approved by EPA. Enclosed is Mr. Remy's proposal for a "208" Planning organization which, in effect, would place our agencies in an advisory capacity with little or no authority to approve or disapprove any plan that may be developed. As of this writing, your staff does not have a specific recommendation. However, at Wednesday!s Board meeting we will outline several alternatives which the Boards may wish to con- sider. I can assure our Directors that your staff is not anxious to get deeply involved in this type of planning effort, particularly in those areas of air quality, land use, and trans- portation.· Our major concern is that the water quality improve- ment plans for the Santa Ana River Basin are not disrupted by planners who have little or no knowledge in.the water pollutioD control field. The current planning efforts required by the Federal construction grant program have caused innumerable delays in getting needed construction under way. In our view, while we have been told this won't happen, the "208" planning designee could further delay needed projects for several years while they look at elusive secondary environmental impacts that we in the dirty water business can't change anyhow. Fred A. Harper General Manager COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) Mr. Larry F. Walker Division Chief November 4, 1975 Manager, Clean Water Grant Program State Water Resources Control Board P. 0. Box 100 Sacramento, CA 95801 Re: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Step 1, Project No. 75-1073, Sewer Use Ordinance Your 510:RAG Attention: Mr. Raymond Walsh Item No. /!; TELE PH ON ES: AR EA C 0 DE 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 Pursuant to your letter of October 24, and our telephone conve~s~ticn c~ Octobe~ 30, this lette~ is writte~ to f~rther explain our position on those provisions of our ordinance which are causing concern to the State Water Resources Control Board staff. ·continued Use of Ad Valorem Taxes The ordinance revenue provisions continue to rely principally on ad valorem taxes even though the General Accounting Office has written the EPA advising that, in its opinion, this is contrary to the intent of PL 92-500. As you know, the EPA Administrator has recommended to the Congress that PL 92-500 be amended to permit the use of ad valorem taxes and HR 9560 has been introduced by the Congressional leaders of the House Public Works Committee which specifically authorizes their use. In addition, I understand the State Water Resources Control Board has urged the California delegation to support ad valorem tax use legislation. While we recognize that as of this date the use of ad valorem taxes cannot be approved, there appears to be sufficient action going on in the Congress on this matter to believe that ad valorem taxes may once again be an Mr. Larry Walker November 4, 1975 Page 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8 1 2 7 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-291 a (714) 962-2411 authorized revenue source. Therefore, we do not intend to amend the revenue portion of the ordinance at this time. In the event that Congress specifically rejects the use of ad valorem taxes, our Board will then consider amending our ordinance to provide for the necessary revenues in accordance with that action. · Heavy Metal Discharge Concentrations and Compliance Dates There appears to be a considerable amount of confusion as to the reasons why our Sanitation Districts have proposed a phasing of restrictions on heavy metal dis- charge concentrations to the sewer system. The proposed source-control progrrun provides for a substantial reduction in the discharge of heavy metals on July 1, 1976, and another significant reduction by July 1, 1978, with a final reduction by the individual perraittee3 not later than July l, 1983. By 1978 our discharge to the ocean will be substantially in compliance with all the heavy metal restrictions set forth in the State's Ocean Plan except chromium (see attached schedule). The July 1, 1983 restrictions are marked tentative as the Districts' improved treatment facilities will not be com- pleted and operational until 1983. The concentration numbers for heavy metals to be imposed on industrial dis- chargers in 1983 are tentative at this time because of our inability to determine that the numbers are adequate to insure compliance. Federal Pretreatment Requirements We believe Sections 302.2 and 302.3-b of our ordinance provide for any Federal and/or State requirements. " ... The conditions of wastewater discharge permits shall be uniformly enforced by the District in accordance with this ordinance and applicable State and Federal regulations." "Section 302.3-b Pretreatment Requirements" "Users shall make wastewater acceptable under the limitations established under this ordinance before discharging to any COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Mr. Larry Walker November 4, 1975 Page 3 public sewer. Any facilities required to pretreat wastewater shall be provided and maintained at the ' user's expense ... " Definition of Industry (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-241 1 The staff will recommend that a definition of industry will be included in an amendment to the proposed ordinance prior to its effective date July 1, 1976. On behalf of the Boards of Directors of the Districts, I request that this information be reviewed by your staff for approval of the manner in which we are proceeding. We believe that while there may be some variation in the detailed provisions of the law at this time, the Districts are certainly acting within the intent of PL 92-500. Thank you for your consideration. ~-~· )L-y-~'- Fred A. Harper · General Manager cc: Members of the Boards of Directors Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel ( COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA EFFECTS OF SOURCE CONTROL PROGRAM AND IMPROVED TREATMENT July 1, 1976 July 1, 1978 --California Ocean Plan Industrial lndustrial2 1-'PDES LU.its Ocean Industrial Industrial Ocean Inplant1 30-Day Discharge Inplant Discharge Reduction Dischargt: Discharge Reduction Constituent Average, mg/l 1!1&/l Removal, \ Limit, mg/l \ mg/l Removal, \ Limit, mg/1 \ ---- Cadaita 0.02 0.032-0.034 lS -20 s.o 56 0.02-0.C23 2S -30 3.0 66 Chroeiua o.oos O.lS -0.17 25 -30 6.0 49 0.10-0.11 35 -40 2.0 66 Copper 0.20 0.27 -0.29 25 -30 10.0 SS 0.20-0.2_2_ 3S -40 4.0 71 Lead 0.10 g,Q8 -0:10 25 -30 2.0 72 2.0 Nickel 0.10 0.09 -0.10 10 -12 10.0 65 10.0 Zinc 0.30 0.35 -0.38 35 -40 15.0 40 0.28-0.31 4S -50 10.0 cs Arsenic 0.01 Q.:.QQ2. Cyanide (Total) 0.10 ~ Mereury 0.001 ( 2..:..Q.Q! Silver 0.02 ~ 1. With SO ~ activated sludge at Plant No. 1. 2. A!S compared to pre-July 1, 1976, conditions. 3. A!SsUJl.ing activated sludge at both Plants No. 1 and No. 2. ( November C, 1975 July 1, 1983 Ocean Industrial Industrial' Discharge Inplant3 Discharge lleGuction mg/l Removal, \ Limit, mg/l \ .011-0.012 30 -JS tl .052-.058 40 -45 0.5 91 .17 -.18 40 -4S 2.0 81 .23 -.25 SO -SS 2.0 69 GOLDEN WEST FERTILIZER COMPANY 80 I I Irvine Boulevard Santa Ana, Calif. 92705 Phone (714) 832-1860 November 11, 1975 Board of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Sludge Sales Bid, S-016 Attention: Mr. Fred Harper Agenda i li:m No. I sJ. - Due to terminology of the subject bid and subsequent conversation with District personnel, there is an apparent misinterpretation of terms of bid items. If the contract for sludge sales is as implied, previous to October 30, 19?5 in writing and verbally, that the successful bidder remove all sludge as produced from the conveyors or hoppers exclusively by his own equipment, Golden West Fertilizer Company bid remains "as is." If the contract for sludge sales is as implied to subsequent meetings held verbally after October 30, 19?5, that the County would remove all sludge as produced from the conveyors or hoppers exclusively by their own equipment, then Golden West Fertilizer Company would have bid an offer to pay County $1.00/yard and as not stated under bid item #3 because it was understood by the document of Sludge Sales Bid, S-016 that bidder would exclusively use his own equipment to remove all sludge as produced from the conveyors or hoppers. Another questionable area under bid item #2 was the transportation of wet sludge from conveyor belt to an off-site area. Under the bid specifications and verbal conversations ·with County officials pertaining to the trucking of wet sludge from the conveyor belt, this bidder was informed that tank-type trailers would have to be used for the removal of this wet sludge. Subsequent to October JO, 1975, bidder has understood that open-type trailers could be used for the purposes. of transporting this wet .sludge, and thereby would have bid a price of $-2.00/yard. Golden West Fertilizer Company-feels that. these items·. are .necessary for discussion previous to the Board of Directors being able to come to a decision concerning the contract for sludge removal. Sincerely, p~ OJ {j ., ,. . ~ Paul A. Cooper Golden West Fertilizer Company .,~""''"""' '''°'"' i\V• < '>" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS '· . ···. 11-12-75 M E M 0 R A N D U M of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 812 7 108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71.C) 5"40-2910 (71.C) 962-2411 TO: Members of the Boards of Directors ·FROM: Fred Harper RE: 208 Planning The following are alternatives with regard to 208 Planning: (1) That the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) be designated as the planning agency (2) A Joint Powers arrangement involving the City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, Orange County Sanitation Districts, the Counties of possibly Ventura, the Metropolitan Water District, Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, etc., with each entity accepting the responsibility of doing the planping within their expertise (3) Four separate planning agencies involving a Joint Powers arrangement in each of the counties, bringing the disciplines together (4) Currently being explored by the State Water Resources Control Board with EPA will be the designation of SCAG which would assemble existing land-use plans and obtain from utilities agencies the best service plans to satisfy existing land-use plans. SCAG would prepare an Environmental Impact Statement based on existing plans and determine the costs necessary to meet environmental standards. For each alternate land-use plan to meet EPA and State environmen~al standards, SCAG would prepare the alternate land-use plans and the utility agencies would provide SCAG with the utility plans to serve the alternate land-use plan areas. SCAG would then develop a recommended 208 plan which includes all the disciplines. This recommended 208 plan would then be passed to the utility agencies for certification by their governing bodies that the wastewater management portion of the plan for their service areas is approved by the governing body of each local agency prior to submittal to the SCAG executive body for approval. and submittal to the State .and EPA. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Boards direct the staff to work with EPA, the State, SCAG, the counties and other local entities in the de~e. opment of an areawide 208 plan in accordance with Alternate , whereby SCAG would be designated as the lead agency with a pr ision that the wastewater management portions of any plan beli proved by the governing bodies of the local agencies prior t SCAG approval and submittal to State and Federal author:L ies. j f) ,, f' I MEET I NG DATE November 12, 1975 T I iv1 E 7: 30 p . rn. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 ,7 & 11 DISTRICT 1 a<" "r oiL'9 ~ '/ ~ (A_ \fUt1JY. . . . . . _L_ ----~ EDR~CH) .•••• BATTIN •••. _/_ ---_v_ ~EVANS •••••••• GARTHE •••• -'-_J_ -"- E I " -../ SHARP •••••••• SALTAR LL · ------ DISTRICT 2 -----~ ,J LYONS · · · • • • • • CALLAH ••• _I ___ -_1 _ EWING •••• • • • .c -••••• -"-__ -_.;_ DIEDRICH).···· CLARK •••••• -" __ .a. __ .1 _ GARTtiE) •.• ···.EVANS •••••. _-.1 __ ...1--__ 1_ THOM) ••••••••• KAYWOOD •••. ~-~-__:(__ FOX) •..•.• • • • • MAC KA IN ••• __L_ __ -_.1_ PERRY. • • • • • I (}.... " !SVALSTAD) ••••• scOTT •••••• I -' PEREZ).······· • • • • .; -~ DUNN~).·· • • ··.WINN ••••••• -, -----~ - WARD) ••••••••• WOOD ••••••• -,---_ -i - GRAHAM) ••••••• YOUNG •••••• / -~ ,J DISTRICT 3 (HOMRIGHAUSEN)~ • • • • • • _, __ .,,. __ .;_ ~: • • • • • • _I_:!:____ -"- (COLL I NS)·· • • • ·BYRNE. • •• • • _, ___ --" _ CULVER· •• •• -" _ -~-_, _ ~~IFFIN)· ·····DAVIS··· •• ·~_,..._--"- ~~THE).······ EVANS. ••••• _I __ ,... __ .1 _ MAC Kr I N) • •••• FOX· • • • • • • • _L_ __ --" _ SONJU • • • •• • • • FRANKi Eijl&H rµ ~ _t;..._ NEV I l-· · · · . · · . GRAHAM •• ~. ~ ___:: _1 _ THOM)·····.· •• KAYWOOD •••• -"--~-~ BLACKMAN) •• • •• MC KNEW •••• _J_ --=.. __ld::·c.... DIEDRJCH) •• • •• SCHMIT ••••• _J ___ -_ --~- GIBBS) •••••••• SHIPLEY •••• _v_ ±___ -"- STANTON) •••••• SVALSTAD. • • J >--" wooD) ••••••••• wARD....... v == ~ ARBISO) ••••••• WEISHAUPT. _i_ __ --"'- DISTRICT 5 ~P. (RYCKOFF). • • • • MC l_NNI • • _.1 __ ...+-__ ./_ (DIEDRICH).···· -E • • • • • ---L -~-_.,_ ROGERS • • • • _.J __ ...... __ /_ DISTRICT 7 __ -, (r ·~NS) ••.••• ( GAAJJ:i> ..... _1 __ ). __ v_ ~ l'M'f HON Y) • • • • • !nnff ON • • • • • ___S!::_ _'-_ ~ DIEDRICH)···· CLARK • •• • • -"-· _+-__ v_ MC INN Is) • • • • DOSTAL····· _.;_ ----__ .1_ () GLOCKNER • • • _J __ ... __ ../_ (~~,. t"/' ) ... · · · JAC Kl1AN-:-••• _L_ __ -_v _ (SHA~P) • • • • • • • SALTARELLI·~ __ --"- DISTRICT 11 /--~ (DIEDRICH) ••• ~f t!t:1J.¥ .... · . _..; ___ --"' _ (GI BBS) ••••••• nttKE • • • • • • • ./ __ --"' _ (WIEDER) •.•••• GIBBS. ~at\ •. --r-_.J. __ ./_ ~!STRICT 8 /J MITCHELL··· __ ---- (JOHNSoNi • • • • • HOLM • • • • • • • ____ -- (DIEDRICH)···· RILEY······ ____ -- 5/29/75 JOINT BOARDS AMO • • • • • • • • _./ __ . !DIEDRICti) ••••• BATTIN ••••• __.:t_ _ ANTHONY) ••••.• BURTON ••••• __&__ __ COLLI NS) ••• • • ·BYRNE· • • • • • • _./ __ _ LYONS) ••••. · •• CALLAHAN • • • _.; __ _ ~EWING) •••••••• CHAPUT······ _v __ _ DIEDRICH) •• • • ·CLARK· • • • • • • _v __ _ HOMR I GHAUSEN). COX· • • • • • • • • _., __ _ CULVER······ "' GRIFFIN) •••• ··DAVIS······· fL -- MC INNIS) ••• • ·DOSTAL· • • • • • __;!___21t5g J/;~. GI BBS) ••••• • • ·DUKE· • • • • • • • _..,, __ _ GARTHE) •••• • • • PIAU~ • • • • • • v MAC Kr IN) ••••• FOX •••••••• ·-, --- SONJU •••••••• FRANKIEWICH. ~ == EVANS ••••••• GARTHE. • • • • • - WIEDERJ ••••••• GIBBS ••••••• v == GLOCKNER.... v ) -;-NfV IL ~ ••••••• GRAHAM •••••• ___ _ ~ vYJ.7 ) • • • • ••• JAG !ff1Aft; . • . • ./ THOM) ••••••••• KAYWOOD ••••• v == FOX) •• ~ ••••••• MAC KAIN.... v RYCOFF J. ~ ••••• MC INNIS •••• -./--- BLACKMANJ ••••• MC KNEW ••••• -,/-------PERRY....... v (DIEDRICH). ····RILEY ••••••• ~ == RIMA •••••••• ~ -- ROGERS •••••• ~ -- SHARP) •••••••• SALTARELLI •• --:£__ __ DIEDRICH) ••••• SCHMIT •••••• _.,,,_ -- SVALSTADL •••• SCOTT ••••••• _v __ _ GIBBS) ••• • • • • • SH I PLEY • • • • • -"--- MC INNIS)····· STORE·······_./_ -- STANTON)· • • • • • SVALSTAD· • • • _.; __ _ PERE?)........ •••••• ~ - WOOD)· • • • • • • • ·WARD· • • • • • • • _./ __ _ ARB I so) ....... WE I SHAU PT ••• _.., --- DUNNE}· • • • • • • ·WINN· • • • • • • • _./ __ _ WARD) ••••••••• WOOD •••••••• _v __ _ GRAHAM) •••• • • • YOUNG ••••• • • _,/ __ _ OTHERS HARPER v SYLVESTER _I/_ LEWIS _./_ CLARKE I/ TAYLOR BROWN -./- ~ I .. ...;:_'."'. ' -I ' \_ • ~ f I J ~ ': /~ I ' """I.,._ WOODRUFF EWING (6nr A.J HOHENER -r HOWARD 11. rv. i HUNT {I 1 0 KE I TH I/ -- --KENNEY Co.., I LYNCH MADDOX -'- L r1 ,,,~MART I NSON ./ PIERSALL lSTEVENS --;----- MEETING DATE November 12, 1975 T I ~~ E 7 : 30 p . m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 DISTRICT 1 ~ ~ JOINT BOARDS RIMA ~,,,~ ~· AMO········~-· (r CDRICH) ..... BATTI·N·:::: ~ ~ y-DIEDRICr) ••••• BATTIN ••.•• ~ --(~ANS) •••••.•• GARTHE •••• ~ _1__ ~ ANTHONY ······BURTON • • • • • ~ __ (SHARP) •• ~SALTARELLI.~~ ~ COLLINS ······BYRNE······· v --\,. .-. . L VONS) •••••••• CALLAHAN · • · V __ DISTRICT 2 EWING) •••••••• CHAPUT······ ~ -- DIEDRICH) ••••• CLARK· ······~ __ LYONS · • · • · • • ·CALLAHAN· • • V ~ _t__ HOMR I GHAUSEN). COX· •• • • • • • • ~ __ EWING ••.• A ••• CHAPUT ••••• ~ ____li._ _:f__ CULVER· ••••. ~ -- DIEDRICH) ••••• cLARK •••••• ~ ::/___ ...:f___ GRIFFJN) •••••• DAVIS······· Cl-~ GART[iE) • • • • • • • E¥Af4~. • • • • • ~ J..__ .Y.__ MC I NNI s) ..... DOSTAL·· • • • • ~ ~il THOM) ••.. ·····KAYWOOD •••. ~~~ GIBBS) •••••••• DUKE········~ __ FOX) · • • • · • • • • ·MAC KA IN· • • _J£:... ~ y__ GARTHE) ••••••• E¥Al4S ••••• • • ~ ! ) PERRY •••••• ~ --f__ MAC K~IN) ••••• FOX ••••••••. ~ --~~mT~~.:::::~~?~T~·.:::: ~=ft t ~e~~~~·::::::::~~I~~~~~~~: ~ == DUNN(:L. • •• ••• WJNN. •• • ••• ~ --111..... :f_ WIEDERJ. •••••• GIBBS ••••••• v -- WARD)··· ······WOOD.·· • • • • ,_,._...._ tV_ ~ GLOCKNER.... v -- GRAHAM) ••••••• YOUNG •••••• ~ ---bl_~ NEVJL), ••••••• GRAHAM •••••• ~ == ) ••••••• Jc':(t ltr t':tJ. . . . . -DISTRICT 3 THOM) ••••••••• KAYWOOD ••••• ~ ~ (HOMRIGHAUSEN).cox •••••••• ...,.... :t---~ FOX) •• ~·······MAC KAIN •••• ....,..... == AMO·....... ~ h _j__ RYCOFF J. ~ ••••• MC INNIS.... v-__ (COLL I NS) •••••• BYRNE. • • • • • V" ~ _:j__ BLACKMANJ ••••• MC KNEW.. • • • ...,..-__ CULVER·. • • • V'" :i--.::J_ PERRY ••.•••• ~ __ GRIFFIN) ••• •• ·DAVIS· ••••• ~ ___fJ::_ 0-.J (DIEDRICH).··· ·RILEY·······~ __ GARTHE)· • • • • • -E¥AP48• • • • • • V"" ]____ r_ RIMA •••••••• ~ __ MAC ~IN) ••••• FOX········ ~ ~ ~ ROGERS •••••• ~ __ SONJU • • • • • • • • FRANKIEWICH ~-%,. ~ SHARP) •••••••• SALTARELLI.. .._.....--__ NEVI~ ········GRAHAM····· ~ tv _L__ DIEDRICH) ••••• SCHMIT •••••• ._...,... -- THOM) ••••••••• KAYWOOD.···~~ _j__ SVALSTAD) ••••• SCOTT ••••••• ~ __ BLACKMAN).···· MC KNEW.·.· V-__1J_ ~ GIBBS) •••••••• SH I PLEY ••• •• v __ DIEDRJCH). ····SCHMIT •••• • ~ ti_ MC INNIS).···· STORE······· ~ -- GIBBS).······· SHIPLEY ••• • ~ J__ STANTON) •••••• SVALSTAD· • • • ~ __ STANTON).·.··. SVALSTAD... v .::J_ PERE?:) •• •••••• . • • · · • • • • • • V--- WOOD) ••••••••• WARD ••••••• ~~+--WOOD) ••••••••• wARD········ ~ -- ARBiso) ••••••• WEISHAUPT. V" ____tL .:.:t__ ARB ISO) •••••• -WEISHAUPT· •• ~ -- --DUNNE)········ WINN········ ~ __ DISTRICT 5 WARD) ••••••••• woOD········--a.£_ ~ ~ } " " GRAHAM)· • • • • • ·YOUNG· • • • • • • ,,,..,,, __ RYCKOFF ······MC INNIS··· ~ -V---~ DIEDRICH). • • • • RI LEY • • • • • ---L-_L__ ROGERS •••• ~ .::t___ .:f--_ OTHERS DISTRICT 6 (MC INNIS) .•••• STORE • • • • • • v _:f__ L_ (DIEDRICH) ••••• BATTIN • • • • • ~ _bl_ .::/___ RIMA ••••••• ~~ 0.... DISTRICT 7 EVANS • • · • • • • GARTHE • • • • • ~ ::/____ L_ ~ "HONY) · • • • • BURTON····· __&__ ~ --@=-D~DR ICH) • • ·: CLARK • • • • • V'"'" :f.__ __]_ MC INN Is) • • • • DOSTAL • • • • • V--N ...:f._ GLOCKNER • • • _lL_ ~ ~ ~~) • • • • • • .diG\SltflAfJ •• •• V"'""" --1{ _.L_ (SHARP) •• • • • • • SALTARELLI • ~ --1i_ _1_ DISTRICT 11 DI EDRJ CH •••• SCHMIT • . • • • V ___!i_ Y GIBBS) .....•• DUKE ••••• •• V' N ~ WIEDER) •.•••• GIBBS······ V" ~ +- DISTRICT 8 5/29/75 HARPER· SYLVESTER LEWIS CLARKE TAYLOR BROWN WOODRUFF EWING HOHENER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVENS NOVEMBER 12, 1975 JOINT MTG. 16 (a) Report of the Joint Chairman MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WILL BE MEETING NOVEMBER 25TH WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF THE REGIONAL EPA OFFICE AND THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD TO REVIEW THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PREPARATION OF THE DISTRICTS' FACILITIES PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR IMPROVED TREATMENT, AT THAT TIMEJ WE WILL EXPLORE SOME ALTERNATE PLANS WHICH HAVE BEEN PRESENTED BY THE STAFF, THE COMMITTEE'S MAJOR CONCERN IS THAT 62~ MILLION IN GRANT FUNDS WHICH ARE EARMARKED FOR OUR DISTRICTS FOR IMPROVED TREATMENT ARE NOT LOST BECAUSE OF DELAYS WHICH COULD RESULT FROM OUR EFFORTS TO PROVE OUT THE JPL SYSTEM, WE WANT EPA's VIEWS ON SOME POSSIBLE ALTERNATE APPROACHES TO SPEEDING UP ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION AT THE TREATMENT WORKS, THE COMMITTEE WILL BE REPORTING TO THE BOARDS ON' OUR MEETING WITH STATE AND FEDERAL PEOPLE AS WELL AS OTHER MATTERS AT THE DECEMBER BOARD MEETING, #6(c) Report of the General Counsel Woodruff reported there was no litigation at all to report on. Had a busy month primarily concerned with contract administration and personnel matters. Will be receiving reports relative to Orange Park Acres annexation. Regarding item on Los Alamitos, at last Board meeting Woodruff was authori zed to negotiate and offer has been accepted. Most of the liability is being absorbed by contractor. #9 ITEf.f> REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR: (a) Svalstad stated he felt we shouldn't have to pay ~% of contract price, should be 6%. Should use two people and get best price. Graham asked if proposals were solicited. REL advised that JCE did land section of ocean outfall and we reviewed engineering proposal and felt it was in order with requirements. Ray read from something and gave rates for average construction costs. Said prevailing percentage in ASCE consulting industry today may not be in line with private industry . Only use them as guidelines. Look more at effort involved. Chaput said his city has specifications and plans made with each project. Didn't understand why we feel because engineering firm has put the facility in, that we are obliged to go back to that engineer. #9 (e) 119 (j) REL said that JCE were familiar with hydraulics of the system. A new firm would be at a disadvantage. Explained that this is an add-on project, not a new project. Callahan questioned when we go to bid or when we don't go to bid. What is our limit? REL answered that there hasn't been any guidelines on that. Depends on project, not the size of the job but the complexity or nature of the project. Saltarelli added that we should maybe set maximum over which we should have competitve bids. It was then moved & seconded to receive, file and accept proposal. Motion carried. FAH then added that the mistnlderstanding or problem here is competitive bidding. Said we need to outline this area to Directors. Will do so at the earliest convenience. REL assured Directors we are getting quality work for lowest price. Saltarelli objected to change order becuase all of these undisclosed utilities were not shown on plans. Asked if this mistake was on the part of designer and if so, should go back to them. Tom Woodruff said that this point has been raised before in his office. Said he would like to present a report on this subject by the December meeting as to the question of liability. Situations occur too frequently where cities have inaccurate utilities plans. Some of it is an honest mistake and some is negligence. Have been looking into it. The question to go back to our designer or to city or possibly utility company is of considerable importance. Saltarelli said he didn't believe it is our fault and shouldn't approve until we determine liability. REL stated that this was an old street and many of the extras were abandoned irrigation lines on which there are no records. Contractor had to remove or dispose of them. Saltarelli added that we maybe should institute legal action to those responsible at the same time we approve change order. Young agreed with Saltarelli. McKnew stated that he thought we had an obligation to the contractor. This is not his responsibility. He was shown a set of plans and we have an obligation to pay him. With respect to whether other entities are responsible, concurred that we should look into it but don't think we should hold up paying the contractor. Saltarelli withdrew comment. Item was moved and seconded. Young then asked if we approve this, are we accepting legal liability? Tom said absolutely not. Called for the question and several Directors objected. Chaput question whether responsibility re $7100 is that of utility company and that we don't have any assurance that we will get anything back. Callahan stated that he would take this to the City Engineer of Placentia and get some ansers. Verbally voted. Motion carried. Kaywood was wondering whether eucalyptus trees could be bypassed. Woodruff said he met with Mr. Ryan and he said he didn't care of we took trees. Have assured property owners that in those areas where there are major large trees, contractor will try to save them. Don't think we would lose too many trees. Wood asked how we were going to be assured of that since nobody seems to care and what if they just chop them down? REL advised that alignment of Santa Ana River Interceptor is through two property owners. Goes along dirt roads and there are breaks in eucalyptus rows. Both contractors have indicated they would shore tightly to get by them . Will try to save trees. -2- \ Clark asked if we were working with County on this regarding trails. Woodruff said we are but their time schedule is much <lifferent from ours. TI1ought the trail that they are proposing is basically the same as ours. Item was then moved, seconded and carried. #12(b) Specification E-077 Clark asked if Bird Machine Company was the only company contacted. FAH answered that they are the manufacturer of equipment that we need parts for--are no other manufacturers. #14(a) Specification S-016 Referred to letter in Directors folders from other bidder, Golden Based on their letter, recommended bids be rejected and authorize clarify some of these points and come back by next Board meeting. seconded and carried. West Fertilizer. rebid so we can It was so moved, Young questioned bid tab and asked that it be written more clearly next time. "Section 208" Planning FAH referred to memo in Directors' folders. Have had discussions with LA County Sanitation Districts and City of LA, as well as talked to Executive Officer of Regional Board in Riverside and members of the State Board. We invited a couple people to come down and explain; however, are not here. Read item 4 on memo. Said State is trying to work with EPA a compromise situation. Is our understanding that the Regional Administrator of EPA thinks SCAG should be designated planning agency. Concern of SWRCB is that since SCAG is planning agency with no implementation powers, that it would be another plan that would eventually wind up on the shelf. Concerned over money in past plans that have been adopted by SWRCB. Concerned that this would be junked. Attempting to have some kind of compromise position so that SCAG would do the layout portion of it and get that information from various entities. Counties of LA, Orange, San Diego and possibly Ventura. FAH reviewed some of the other alternatives. State Board does not have any kind of assurances from EPA as of today on this item No. 4. Staff recommendation is that we work with EPA, SWRCB, the Counties and other local entities in developing "208" plan . Wastewater management plans would be subject to Boards' approval prior to incorporation in plans of State and EPA. Once plan is adopted in about 3 years, grant ftmds would only be given to those agencies that are fulfilling the plans in that "208" plan. Young said she sat on SCAG policy committee during the last couple years. Said they don't utilize input from respective agencies. Just take information. Asked if we felt we could take on SCAG and win. FAH said St'ate Board is trying to work out that we do have input. State Board will put the clause "That any wastewater management plan will have to be approved by governing body of affected agencies." Young said other concern is that when SCAG feels they don't have expertise, will go out and put on experts. Increases our costs and we have plenty of expertise in our cgencies . Young said she would favor Alternates 2 or 3 over 4. FAH said there isn't any money released by O!ftt B, so money will only be at 75%. SCAG will be looking to some of the other entities for other 25%. Wood said No. 2 does not mention cities in that alternate. In future implementation of non-point source pollution problem would have to be a part of management program according to the way the law is written. No. 2 is the way to get your two cents worth in. -3- . ~ 114- FAH said No. 2 wound up wi~h ome 17 agencies involved in Joint Powers Agreement . Under No. 3 would be a sep ate plarming agency in each county. Advised that there is a hearing in LA Monday and in talking with State people, h a ve advised them that this is a complex thing. Don't believe City of LA can get anything by Monday. Have a~~d ~t.Q. hold the record OIUm-to.....D~~ember 15th. The Boards may wish to ma'~ eir recommendation at the December 10th meeting so can get into the record -\ \. before the 15th. /\'-'\I \} ~ ~~ Winn suggested they continue this until next meeting and requested Directors to v ~ . send in their comments so we can study this. l ) . d )f (·/ Chaput asked what type of comment they were going to make. Robin Young. Asked for a straw vote on No. 3. - Said he went along with Wood referred to testimony she heard that separate county entities are not going to function properly unless we have people affected by each . Clark advised that the Board of Supervisors endorsed SCAG for "208". Riley said in order to be effective, SCAG will have to be the one entity than be concerried with each of the areas . Wood said "208" really relates to urban areas. Saltarelli said that it seemed to him that voting power is against us in Orange County. Suggested that we advise that we are inclined to go along with item 3 or another alternate that will be determined at December meeting. McKnew stated they don't have sufficient input to vote on any alternative. Need a committee to receive input and come back in December. Graham said a straw vote on how we feel at this present time based on views that have been presented would indicate general mood. Duke said he ' thought maybe the Joint Chairman should speak before hearing and give reasons why we feel No. 3 is best. Saltarelli stated we should have some discussion on this. Fox said SCAG is putting pressure on City Managers now. Perez said he agreed that we need to say that we can do a very good job of planning and we wish to joint with others in cooperative ? either under 2 or 3. Mcinnis added this is terribly complex. SAWPA has already done the planning for the whole area. Only other area is Upper Newport Bay-Santiago Creek area. NIWA already designated. EPA will never accept. Suggested they take staff's recommendation and take out "SCAG" and put "sub-regional agency". He then made this in the fonn of a motion to direct staff to go forward and change wording as directed. Motion seconded. Some discussion -clarified substitute motion that it was recommendation No. 4 with wording changes. Called for the question on substitute motion. Roll call vote. 1 District approved; 3 Districts disapproved; and 3 Districts tied. Motion failed. Motion made to take straw vote on alternatives available and that staff be directed that their current thinking is along these lines. By show of hands. Verbal vote taken regarding taking a straw vote. Motion carried. Withdrew the word "straw" in motion to take straw vote. -4- Wood stated she objected to procedure on "208". Battin not ? --- Graham questioned that last two votes. Tom Woodruff stated substitute motion failed. whether there should be a straw ballot cast. Second motion was to consider That motion carried by Chair. Straw vote then taken regarding recommendations 1, 2, 3 and 4. No. 1 -4 votes No. 2 -None No. 3 -16 votes No. 4 -4 votes Was stated that motion was to give staff general direction . MCinnis stated that he wanted to record his total objection to this type of procedure. Fox agreed. Woodruff said in his opinion straw vote is no action. Board did t ake some specific action by disapproving substitute motion. Show of h ands has n o effect legally. Possible to have show of hands by District. It was then moved & seconded to move agenda. Motion carried. McKnew commented he didn't know what was happening. Staff h as no direction. Svalstad said we should move on with agenda. #18 (b) Industrial Waste Ordinances FAH reported that as a result of last month's hearing the staff sent to SWRCB a letter attempting to clarify some points they had raised in a letter to the Board. Said today we received by telephone some response to this. They said it was the best ordinance they had seen yet; however, they cannot go along with the ad valorem tax as such becuase in their opinion the opinion of GAO says ad valorem tax cannot be used. Did not oppose adoption of the resolution because of that fact. Want some assurance that if Congress determines that they are not going to a llow ad valorem by adoption of HR 95-60, that the Boards would submit to changing the method of collecting revenue and go to user charge. On heavy metal discharge what we have submitted is in order. State did say that all in all they would like us to proceed with adoption of ordinances a nd get on with source-control program. Some discussion. Roll call votes. #37 City of Los Alamitos item Tom Woodruff reported on background of problem and what has been agreed to. Moved & seconded to approve payment. Culver asked if we could delete "inspection fees". REL said contractor will pay for good portion of this . They will be responsible for i nspection and we will be responsible for other. Cox abstained from voting on motion. Chair then asked for informal indication re straw vote . -5- (15) Discussion regarding "Section 208" planning W.®ld-b e-a-hearing-on-Menday• Nrurember. 17., _ 1970, in ho• Anget.... egarding designation. of a "Section 2~8"~ agency for the Southern California area pursuant to provisions Federal Water Pollution Control Act. ~ ~ the BoaTds itt c-n11ne-ctimrt'trerewi t . The Genera advised that they have ~equested that the hearing indicated to the on December The General Manager ~:':.eetings to date between the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), the-~or ,8.ewerage !gencies in ,Southern Qalifornia , and the Southern California Association of ~overnments (SCAG)~ 'i:he~n~~~F then ().~0-"' ~ ~,;_ ~ reviewedAseveral .alternatives un~r consideration wHh52 reggsJ to JHi@e Heu (1) That the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) be designa ted as the planning agency (2) A Joint Powers arrangement involving the City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, Orange County Sanitation Districts, the Counties of Lo s Angeles, Orange1 \ Riverside, San Bernardino, and possibly Ventura , the Metropolitan Water District, Santa An a Watershed Proj ect Authority, etc., with each entity accepting the responsi- bility of doing the pla nning within their expertise (3) Four separate planning agencies involving a Joint Powers arrangement in each of the counties, bringing the . ~ discipl{nes together (4) ~ly being explored by the State Water Resources ~~ Control Board with EPA~ be the designation .of SCAG which would assemble existing land-use plans and obtain f ~-. h b . 1 . f rom ut1 1ttes agencies t e est service p ans to satis y existing land-use plans. SCAG would prepare an Environ- mental Impact Sta tement based on existing plans and de termine the costs necessary to meet environmental standards. For each a lternate land-use plan to meet EPA and State environmental standards, SCAG would prepare the alternate land-use plans and the utility agencies would provide SCAG with the utility plans to serve the a lterna t e land-use plan areas. SCAG would then develop a r ecommended 208 plan which includes all the discip lines. This recommended 208 plan would then be passed to the util.i ty agenci es for certification by their governing bodies that the wastewater management portion of the plan for their service a reas is approved by the governing body of each loca l agency prior to submittal to the SCAG executive body for approval. and submittal to the State' and EPA. EPA has inferred that they would prefer SCAG be designated as the planning agency. However, consider a ble :LJ has been expressed ~ ~ because SCAG is only a pl anning agency with fl& implementation powers~ t;J>erefgre, uia:ble pl::?ll if adopted mj g~t· R0~ "9e-i111ptement:eti"t' Mr. Harper recommended: It is recommended that the Boards direct the staff to work with EPA, the State, SCAG, the counties and other local entities in the develop- merit of an areaw:lde "20s ''p1an in accordance with Alternate 4, whereby SCAG would be designated as the lead agency with a provision that the wastewater management portions of any plan be approved by the governing bodies of the local agencies prior to SCAG approval and submittal to State and Federal authorities. ~ The Board then entered into a lengthy discussion concerning the alternates ';{ and ,the relative advantages and disadvantages of each, as well ai;-the _ J~ =.~t:C:.of SCAG p~art~· i at,ion in waste~ater management planning )and tj( v ttM 9 ~ 1':i .i.ll.-.. N~~~ ~t~~--fl'--L~J..: ~ft._ ~ fop '. g plkmtbtt~ A m ti on l:'was then introdu~d and s~conded to informally poll the Directors ~i} ~~ on the several alternatives.<fr~~g- further discussion, a substitute motion was offered and seconded that Al ternat&e. 4 be adopted,(substi tuting the wherever "SCAG" appear,a J( . . term "sub-regional agency" (M"tL ~ Following a roll call vote1 the General Counsel reported that tfte ~~ -5tibstitttte motion had failed to pass by virtue of on~strict voting . 1 ~~~ in favor ·~e•ee~ threefa~~cts voting against the moti~~n~three ~stricts with a tie vote. ~vote was then taken on the~m~ion to informally poll the Directors~~~ p~n on the several alternatives. The Joint Chairman announced that the 1;L,_t~~d passed and indicated that the staff's general direction was that Di1ecte~ preferred Alternate 3 . Directors Mcinnis, Fox, Wood and Battin requested that their objection to the Boards' proceedings in consideration of the ''Section 208'' matter be made a matter of record.