HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-11-12..J MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, Californ i a
JOINT BOARDS
Regular Meeting
November 12, 1975 -7:30 p.m .
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Elli s Avenue
Fountain Vall ey, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 7 1 4
540-2910
962-2411
The following is a brief explanation of the more important,
non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which
are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are not
attac hed to the agenda sinc e they are made up immediately pre-
ceding the meeting, but will appear in the supplemental agenda
availab l e at the meeting.
Joint Board s
No. 9-a -Proposal for Design of Surge Tower Extension
at Plant No. 2.
As previously reported, the staff· has prepared the plans
and spec ifications to procure the pumps, right angle gears and
the engines for Additional Pumping Facilities for the Ocean Outfall
Booster Station at Plant No . 2 . Presently the staff is prepa ring
plans and specifications for the installat i on of these three major
components of the Additional Pumping Facilities a n d these will be
presented to the Boards at the December or January meeting.
When these pumping units are completed, it will be nec essary
for an extension of the surge tower on the new ocean outfall to
be constructed to accommodate the additional pumping heads . During
a December storm last year , the effluent in the surge tower was
within thr ee feet of overflowing. Because of the necessity to
move ahead with the surge tower extension , we request e d an engineer -
ing proposal from John Carollo Engineers to prepare the plans a nd
specifications and n ece ssary bid documents . Since Carollo designed
the ocean outfall and is familiar with the hydraulics associated.
th e rewit h , it is recomnended that they be retained in accordance
with their proposal of October 21st . The fe e for engineering
services as described is $6,500 . This is a budgeted item in the
current CORF budget.
District No . 2
No. 9-b and 9-c -Award of Contracts Nos. 2-14-3A and 2-14 -4A
Th e Directors wi ll recall at the October 1st meeting, we
advised that the State Board staff gave us the option of awarding
Contracts 2-14-3 and 2-14 -4 on the condition that the project
manhole frames and covers were to b e rebid as a separat~ contract .
Change Order No. 1 for each of the two contracts (2-14-3 and
2-14-4) were approved which deducted an amount of $3 ,700
and $5 ,1 80, respectively , f r om the two contracts . The act i ons
appearing on the agenda approve Resol u tions Nos . 75 -1 48 -2 and
75 -1 49 -2 awarding the contracts to Long Beach Iron Works for
these manhole frames and covers in the amounts of $3 ,604 and
$5 ,045.60. The staff recommends approval of these two material
contracts for the Sarita Ana River I nterceptor Sewer .
No . 9-d -Assignment of Contract No. 2-14 -3
Enclosed in the agenda material is a request from John A.
Artukovich Sons , Inc., to assign Contract No . 2 -14-3, Santa Ana
River Interc ept or, to John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., and John A.
Artukovich, Jr ., a joint venture . This assignment gives the
contract additional bonding security and the staff recommends
approval of this assignment .
No. 9-e and 9 -f -Change Orders Nos. 1 and 2 to Contract
No . 2 -16-1
Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $23,394 .30 i s for
re l ocations and interferences of abandoned irrigation lines,
water mains, telephone cables, as well as gasoline and oil lines
located in Kraemer Boulevard which were not shown on the plans.
Approximately $7,100 of the total Change Order amount will be
billed to the respective utility comp a nies.
Change Order No . 2 adjusts the engin eers ' quantities to
the actual measured unit s of certain street improvements which
were made a part of this contract . The City of Placentia will
p ay for $1 2,300 of this total adjustment which is in the amount
of $15,568 . This project was comp l eted within the original
contract time limits as established and no extensions of time
are r equ ired.
No . 9-g -Completion of Contract No. 2-16-1
The contractor, George Miller Construction Company, has
completed the Kraeme r Boulevard Intercep tor Sewer from Palm
Drive to Imp erial Highway through the City of Placentia . This
pro j ect is a 24 -inch diameter sewer friom Kraemer and Palm Drive
to Kraemer and Bastanchury and a 21-inch sewer from that inter-
section to the intersection of Kraemer Boulevard and Imperial
Highway. This facility is designed to handle 5 .0 mgd and is
par t of the Master Plan Trunk Sewer System. The staff recommends
acceptance of the work and direction to file the Not i ce of Com -
pletion .
No . 9-h -Approval of Plans and Specifications for Contract
No. 2 -16-2
I n September , 1 974, a cont r act was awarded to construct the
Yorba Linda Pump Station which is located on the Ca l ifornia State
-2-
-. ..
University, Fullerton campus, at the intersection of Associated
Road and Yorba Linda Boulevard. This project is now nearing com -
pletion . The plans and specifications for the connecting force
main which will extend from the Pumping Station to the int er-
section of Kraemer and Palm Drive are now complete and ready for
bid . The engineer's estimate for this project is $803 ,345. We
will receive bids for the work on December 16th . With the award
of this force main project, the major Master Plan facilities will
be completed or under contract to meet the immediate needs of the
District with the exception of the Carbon Canyon Dam Sewer .
No. 9-i -Report of Development and Annexation of Anaheim
Hi l l s Area
At the July 9th Board meeting, the Board authorized initiation
of proceedings of proposed Annexation No . 12 to the Distric t which
is a part of the Anaheim Hills, Inc., development. This annexation
was for approximately six acres of territory in the Santa Ana
Canyon area . Representatives of Anaheim Hills, Inc., indicated
at that time that they would submit a definitive development
phasing plan for the Anaheim Hills area . The report, which is
included in the agenda material, ·advises that the company wi ll be
requesting annexation of approximately 1438 acres during the next
five years and contemplates over 7000 living units in this a rea.
The District staff has checked the anticipated densities and they
arc consiatent ~ith the District's Master flan.
No. 9 -j -Staff Report re Acquisition of Rig hts of Way -
Santa Ana River Intercept or Sewer.
Enc l osed with the agenda is a status report on the Santa Ana
River Interceptor right-of-way acquisition through the Canyon area.
District No. 3
No. 9-1 and 9-m -Stop Notices re Contract No. 3 -18
and
4).
the
We have received Stop Notices from
a subcontractor on Contract No. 3-18
The actions appearing on the agenda
Notices.
Districts Nos. 3 and 11
a material supplier
(Knott Interceptor, Reach
acknowled g e receipt of
No. 9-n -Authorizing Solicitation of Engineering Proposals
to Prepare Right-of-Way Napping
A recent review of the status of the easements for Districts
Nos . 3 and 11 reveals discrepancies in the docum ents for the right
of way acquired for the trunk sewer system . The staff has
attempted over the past four to five years to compile all of the
-3-
documents and cross reference these with a card index and appro-
priate mapping. This is required to facilitate review of changes
in right of way for maintenance and/or inquiries of o ther agenc ies
regarding their status. The engineer we retained for Dis tr ic t
No. 2 found easement records which may require quitclaims and
other adjustments to correspond the right of way with our trunk
system. It is estimated that this combined effort for Dist ricts
Nos. 3 and 11 should not exceed $8,500. Approximately $6 ,5 00
would be borne by District No. 3 and $2.000 by District No. 11.
The staff requests authority to solicit proposals and present
them at the December Board meeting for consideration.
District No. 5
No. 9-o -Increase in Connection Charges for 1976
The current District Ordinance provides that the Board may
escalate these charges annually in a specified amount. The Ordinance
also requires that if fees are to be increased for the fol low ing
year, action must be taken before December 1st of each year. As
of November 1, the District's Facilities Revolving Fund in which
the connection fees are deposited totals $2 6 0,00 0 . It is recom-
mended, because the projected needs of the District outstrip the
anticipat ed revenues, that the connection charges be increased
from $170 to $175 per dwelling unit and from $8 7 .50/1000 sq . ft.,
+-o A,90/~ru,...rl C"rt T,....;_ T-.1""\'Vl Y'l.1•' n,-.V"\c~.f-"V1i'l,"""'.;...~r'\Y• _..;....i....,...,~ .;.-~a,,_,,.:;.,,,."""-;';..; NO
"" ~ / ..i.. Uv ...,'-:i• -'-v., ..L..v..L J..1.evv vv.1..u . .>v ..L 1...t.\..-'-'..LVJ..l vvJ.J.\....J. 1..1.&..1. .LJ. u.wv-......L..J..4no
units.
District No. 6
No. 9-p -Claim of Halecrest Park, Inc.
The District has received a claim for alleged damages t o a
sewer lateral in the amount of $2,918. Apparently, the lateral
was damaged during the construction of a force main fa ci lity many
years ago which was later sold to the District. Th e action
appearing on the agenda deny i ng the claim is recommended by the
General Counsel.
District No. 7
No. 9-q and 9-r -Closeout of Contract No. 7-6-7
Change Order No. 1 is an adjustment of the engineer's
quantities which is a deduction in the contract of $1,192 with an
amended contract price of $348,626. Since the contract was
completed within the original time limits, no time extensions
are required. Resolution No. 75-153-7 accepts this project as
complete and a uthori zes filin g of a Notice of Completion and
approves a Final Closeout Ag reement with the contractor. This
sewer will relieve the presently overloaded sewers in the North
Tustin area. The pipe diameters are 21" and 24 11 , capable of
handling flows up to 9.64 million gallons per day.
-4-
No. 9 -s -Appr ov e Pl a n s a n d Specifi cat i ons for Contract
No. 7-6-8
Plans and specifi cations for this reach of the Tustin-Orange
S ewe r extending from Fairhaven and Esp l anade to Santiago Boulevard
and Bond Street in Orange have been prepared in accordance with
the Master Plan of Sewers and with the approved Preliminary
En g i neering Repo r t dated February, 1974. The estimated cos t of
construction i s $587 ,620. It is recommended that the scheduled
b i d d ate for thi s contract be established as December 16, 1975.
No. 9 -t -Trading Easements re Tract No . 5448
Th e r esolution appear i ng in the agenda autho~izes acceptance
of a n e w easement f rom the Tustin Construction Company , Inc ., and
ex ecu t i on o f a Qu itclaim Deed to the same firm. This trade of
eas eme n ts is to accommodate the r elocation of an existing sewer
at no c ost to the District .
Distr ict No . 11
No. 9-u -Aw~r d of Contract No. ll-4R
Bids we re r eceived f o r i mproving the appearance of the
Ne wl a n d -Hamilton Pump Station Facilities in Huntington Beach on
October ~0t h. Three bids were receive d with t~~ J ow bio for t he
c ombined work required for the District 's facilities and a Southern
Ca lifornia Gas Company metering structure being submitted by
Clifford L . Thompson Construction Company in the total amount of
$1 9 ,821. The Gas Company will reimburs e the District $3 ,000 for
the work required on their property . In submitting the low bid,
Clifford Thompson neglect e d to sign his proposal . It is recom -
mended that the Board waive this irreg ulari ty and accept Schedule
A of his bid proposal. The engineer 's estimate for this work is
$25 ,000 (budget -$40 ,000).
All Districts
No . 1 2 -Pur chase of Centrifuge Parts from the Bird Mach ine r y
Co mpany .
In September, the .Boards authorized the staff to ne gotiate
wi th the Bird Machinery Company for the purchase of three sets o f
c ent rifuge bowl head skimmers and two sets of rotating elements
wh ich are compatible with our existing Bird cent ri fuge s. Enclosed
i n the agenda ma t erial is a staff report and r e co~mendat ion as a
r esul t of the n egotiations . We recommend the execution of a
p ur chase contrac t with the Bird Machinery Company, in form approved
b y t he General Counsel, to purchase the rotatin g elements in
a c cordance with Option No . 3 of the staff report for a total price
of $172 ,260 plu s freight , t axes , and price escalation terms .
-5-
We further recommend that we be authorized to purchase the
three bowl head skimmer conversion kits, a gear unit, and a pair
of interchangeable pillow blocks as a separate order totaling
$31,087 plus sales tax and freight. The Directors may wish to
discuss in more detail the purchase options outlined in the staff
report.
No. 13 -Procedures for Collection of Delinquent Accounts
The two resolutions appearing in the agenda establish the
new procedures for the collection of delinquent accounts owed
to the Districts and authorizes specifically-named persons to
act as agents for the Districts in small claims actions. The
General Counsel recommends adoption of the resolutions.
No. 14 -Sale of Sludge
The Districts have received a satisfactory bid for the
dispo sal of our ce ntr ifuged sludge from the Kellogg Supply
Company of Harbor City . In view of our past experiences, we
recommend that the contract be awarded for a period of one year,
with provisions for two, 1-year extensions in accordance with the
Kellogg Supply Company bid items Nos. 2 and 3.
This firm is well known and respected. Their sewage sludge
products e.re !!!E.:!?~eted ~~der t~e r..21!'!.e o f ~!itrQh1-lr::1J.~. 1.'!e beli~~.'"e
that this contract will provide us adequate time to develop a
long-range disposal plan in conjunction with the 3-year Regional
Wastewater Solids Study which is now under way.
No. 15 -Staff Report on "208 " Planning Designation for
the South Coast Area
Enclosed in the agenda material on Page "T" is a copy of a
notice of a November 17th public hearing from the State Water
Resources Control Board regard ing "Section 208 Planning for the
South Coast Area". A separate staff report is enclosed.
No. 16 -Annual Audit Report
Copies of the annual report for the year ended June 30th
have been mailed to all Directors by Peat , Marwick, Mitchell
Company, Ce rtified Public Accountants. The action appearing on
the agenda is to receive and file the report. If any Director
has any questions concerning the report or the auditors' comments,
please call Wayne Sylvester, our Director of Finance.
No. 17 -Purchase of Parts to Rebuild Gas Engine
A large sludge gas engine which drives one of the pumps at
Plant No. 2 is in need of a major overhaul. The action appearing
on the agenda will permit the staff to take informal bids for
the purch ase of the parts necessary to rebuild an engine manu-
factured by the Waukesha Motor Company.
-6-
No. 18 -Proposed Ordinance Establishing Regulations
for Use of Districts' Sewerage Facilities
November 12th has been established by the Boards for the
second reading of the proposed Industrial Waste Ordinance. The
Directors will recall that the staff was directed to contact
the State Water Resources Control Board staff for a further
clarification of their concerns about the lack of certain pro-
visions in the ordinance. Enclosed is a letter marked Agenda
Item No. 18 to Mr. Walker of the State Board staff, clarifying
the points raised by the State. We are hopeful that we will
receive a reply by next Wednesday.
No. 19 -Executive Session re Employee Wage and Benefit
Negotiations
Included in the agenda packet is a confidential report to
the Directors on the negotiations to date between management and
the representatives of the Orange County Employees Association.
There have been eleven meet-and-confer sessions. Two more meet-
ings are scheduled prior to the Wednesday Joint Board meeting.
It is· not known at this time if a Memorand~m of Understanding
can be presented to the Boards for their consideration. If any
Director h as any questions or would like to know mor e details,
please call Fred Harper.
District No . 2
No. 28 -Award of Contract No. 2-14 -5 -Santa Ana River
Interceptor Sewer
Bids were received on the last contract for the Santa Ana
River Interceptor Sewer which extends from Gypsum Canyon Road
to the Orange County line. The staff was pleased with the
interes t shown by the number of contractors who submitted bids
which r anged from c low of $2,096,676 to a hi g h of $3 ,517,989.
The low bid was submitted by S. S. Zarubica Company
which was 16 % under the engineer's estimate of $2,483 ,167. The
action appearing on th e agenda approves Resolution No . 75-158 -2,
awarding the contract to S . S . Zarubica Comp any in the amount of
$2,096,676.15 upon r ece ipt of the re q uired approvals from th e
State Water Resources Control Board.
Dis"'crict No. 5
No. 34 -Approving the County of Oran e as Member Agency of
the Newport-Irvin e Waste Management Planning Agency NIWA
The Board of Directors of NIWA me t November 5th to consider
the proposal of the County Supervisors for participation b:: the
County of Orange as a member agency . Essentially, the conditions
-7-:-
I '
set forth by the Supervisors provided that the County would
assume the lead responsibility for the Joint Powers Agency and
that NIWA should include the County, the Cities of Newport
Beach and Irvine, and any other watershed city wishing to join,
Irvine Ranch Water District , County Sanitation District No. 5,
Orange County Water District, and the Department of Fish and
Game. The Board of Directors of NIWA determined that the con-
ditions set forth by the County for membership were acceptable.
It is, therefore, recommended that Resolution No. 75-159-5,
approving inclusion of Orange County as an additional member
agency of NIWA subject to the conditions of the Board of
Supervisors' Resolution No. 75-1431 is recommended. If approval
is given by all member agencies, a revision in the ·Joint Powers
Agreement will be required.
Included for District No. 5 Directors are copies of a draft
amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement dated October 31, 1975,
which was submitted by the County.
District No. 3
No. 37 -Report of General Counsel Regarding City of Los
Alamitos Fees in Connection with Contract No. 3 -21-1
T11t:: Ger1e.r:~l Cu:...:.11tJel 11\.:i.~ 1Jeer1 r1eg otlal,lr1g t11 e seLrLlenler~L uf
the claim of the City of Los Alamitos of $5,640 for engineering
and inspection fees claimed to be due the City in connection with
the construction of the Westside Relief Interceptor, Contract
No. 3-21-1. A brief report is included in the agenda material
recomme nding payment to the City in the amount of $4 ,000.
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
..
!I ,,
I
II
re ... ~ FILE ···~·--l ...... ..
LmER ....•••••..•••
A/C .••. TKLR ••••
LOAi .. t>S '°"' ;c ui~~ECYOL.S
County San ita ti on Districts
of Orange County, Californi~
JOINT BOARDS
MEETING DATE
NOVE~BER 12J 1975 -7:30 P.M.
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll Call
f'o~t Office box 81:-
10844 El I 1s Avenu•
Fountain Valley, Calif., 9270E
Teiephones:
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
ADJOUR:::.:r::ffS POSTED -
Co ''P" ,. :··· -. .-~
1.1 ...._. L .. • _' 1· [." ............ .
F:l :::::; ~' : : I) v
fL. : . : .. ; (:· :~. :rn.D .. f"
l[l1c ... : • ... ·: ... ~ ....
r.rn~~ i ~;:; '.. ·,: .. ii .. 7 .. ~
MINUTES 1-ILED ................. .
(3)
(4)
Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary 1i-l --~
(5)
Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any.
See supplemental agenda ... 0~
EACH DISTRICT ---·-············--Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings,
as mailed:
District 1 -October
October
District 2 October
October
District 3 -October
October
District 5 -October
October
District 6 -October
October
District 7 -October
October
District 11 -October
October
(6) ALL DISTRICTS
Reports of:
(a) Joint Chairman
(b) General Manager
(c) General Counsel
1, 1975 regular and
29, 1975 adjourned
1, 1975 regular and-a.A~
29, 1975 adjourned
I, 1975 regular and
29, 1975 adjourned
1, 1975 regular and
29, 19 75 adjourned
1, 1975 regular and
29, 1975 adjourned
1, 1975 regular and
29, 1975 adjourned
1, 1975 regular and
29, 1975 adjourned
( 7) ALL DI STRICTS
Con sideration of mo tion t o r ece ive and file c ertifica tion of th e
General Manager that he h as checked all bills ap pearing on th e agenda,
found them to be in order , and that he recommends autho ri zation for
payment
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
(8)
ROLL CALL \'OTE •. _.,.-
l TC!.13 m~
SUPPlEM ~NT AL AG!:NDA
Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating
and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund accotmts. payable check registers
for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing
payment of claims listed on page "I" ; and approving accotmts
payable check registers for signature of the Chairman of the
respective District, and authorizing payment of said claims listed
on the pages indicated below:
DISTRICT 1 M!:1"'l"Mt3 1 if imy. • • • . . . • . . • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • NONE
DISTRICT 2 warrants -See page "II"
DISTRICT 3 warrants -See page "II"
BISTRICTG 3 & 11 s~pense ftmd warrtl:fl:ts, if any •.•.•••. NONE
DISTRICT 5 warrants, if B:Rf •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• NONE
DISTRICTS 5 & 6 suspense ftmd warrants -See page "II"
DISTRICT 6 warr81\ts, if eny .....•.....•••.•.•.•...••• ~. NONE
DISTRICT 7 warrants -See page ------, "III"
DISTRICT 11 W6:l"l"8:ftt3, if eny.. . • . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . • • . • NONE
(9) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT ·CALENDAR
FILE······-
1.ffiER ···-··-
A/C .... TIClR ·-
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Un animo us Ballot
•
ITEMS NOS I 9 (A) THROUGH 9 ( u )
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered
as not requiring discussion or further explanation and
unless any particular item is requested to be removed from
the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member
of the public in attendance, there will be no separate
discussion of these items. All items on the consent
calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions,
and casting a tmanimous ballot for resolutions included on
the consent calendar . All items removed from the consent
calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the
consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, stat e
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from
the consent calendar. (a..) ( € ) (~ )
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing
on the consent calendar not specifi cally r e moved from same.
-2-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
-~~
A/C •••• TKLR ....
:,/
FILE --···-·----·~ ,\./ ~~-~~-----' "-v.
A/C ___ TIClR --
FILE .~ ••••• .i..·-··-·
LETTER !~-~~ . ..};/'"
A/C •.•• TKLR _
······---·-···-··-.. -
FILE rtQ~
~.;rn:h. i\; .. · ,.' , . ., ·--~ ···---··-
A/C •••• TKLR --
~ .. L~L.·~._l$£1 ~
:.......
FllE ••• ----
lEntR--
A/C •••• TKLR -
···············-
···············-······-
FILE··-··-
LETTER.-
A/C ••.. TKLR -
FILE ···-··--··-.-/ f~ \I ,.,,
\~-~------
A/C .... ~-~-~:.~ .. ~.-~ .. :::£
~ _______ ......,_
ALL DISTRICTS
C--c;}J Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal ~ of John Carollo Engineers, dated October 21, 1975, for
engineering services in connection with design of Surge
Tower Extension at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-9-2, for a lump
sum fee of $6,500. See page "A"
.DISTRICT 2
(b) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 75-148-2, to receive
and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract
for Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer (From Grove Street to
Imperial Highway) Manhole Covers and Frames, Contract No. 2-14-3A,
to Long Beach Iron Works, Inc. in the amount of $3,604.00. See page "B"
(c) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 75-149-2, to receive
and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract
for Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer (From Imperial Highway to
Gypsum Canyon Road) Manhole Covers and Frames, to Long Beach Iron
Works, Inc. in the am01.m.t of $5, 045. 60. See page "C"
(d) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from John A.
Artukovich Sons, Inc., dated October 21, 1975, requesting
assignment of Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer (in La Palma
Avenue from Grove Street to Imperial Highway) and South Santa Ana
River Interceptor Connector (in Imperial Highway, from 300' South
of Santa Ana Canyon Road to LaPalma Avenue) Reaches 2, 3 & 4,
Contract No. 2-14-3, to John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. and John A.
Artukovich, Jr., a Joint Venture, and approving said assignment
in a form acceptable to the General Cotms el. See page "D"
tfe)}consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the
~ plans and specifications for Kraemer Boulevard Interceptor
Sewer, From Palm Drive to Imperial Highway, Contract No. 2-16-1,
authorizing an addition of $23,394.30 to the contract with
George Miller Construction Company, for additional work due to
undisclosed utilities. See page "En
(f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the
plans and specifications for Kraemer Boulevard Interceptor
Sewer, From Palm Drive to Imperial Highway, Contract No. 2-16-1,
authorizing an addition of $15,568.00 to the contract with
George Miller Construction Company, due to an adjustment of
engineer's quantities. See page "F"
(g) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-150-2, accepting Kraemer
Boulevard Interceptor Sewer, From Palm Drive to Imperial Highway,
Contract No. 2-16-1, as complete; authorizing execution of a
Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement.
See page "G"
(h) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 75-151-2, approving
plans and specifications for Yorba Linda Boulevard Force Main,
Contract No. 2-16-2, and authorizing advertising for bids on
December 16, 1975
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
(9) (CO~<::~~;·;· C' \JD~DAR cc•ntinued from p~ge 3)
I t:TTER ···-··-··-
~·c .... TKLll ••••
----··-······-·
0.. ~i~ /
FllE -~----
LETTER ••• -
A/C •••. TKLR -
···-··---··-··----
/~;~-!/ '~-'~---·:-.....
LETTER ···········-
A/C •••• TKLR ··-
FI LE •• ~.'.°:!.:~·-····
LETTER ·--··-··-
A/C •••• TKLR ••••
FILE --~---~· •• }:._
LETTER ···---···-
A/C •••• TKLR ••••
' . ',~ ... ,v'
\,FILE ················~:·\
. 1.t'i-\..V'
LETTER --~·······-
A/C .... TKLR ·-·
···········-··········-
.................. ---
f,LE ················-
·. . L_ETTER -~--=:
A/C •.•• TKLR --·
FlLE •.•• ~.:..·--.v
. LEnER ···--! .. -
A/C •••. Tl<L• ··-
..................
~
LmER ·······-···-
A/C .... TKLR ·-·
-··-··-··------
DI~~: !C1 2 (Continued)
(i) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from
Anaheim Hills, Inc., dated September 30, 1975, relative to
their overall development plans for Anaheim Hills in
connection with forthcoming annexations to the District
See page "H"
~Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report ~on acquisition of rights of way for the Santa Ana River
Interceptor Sewer, Contracts Nos. 2-14-4 and 2-14-5.
(mailed with agenda material)
DISTRICT 3
(k) Consideration of motion to receive and file interim staff
report on odor control problems relative to operation of
the Knott Interceptor in the City of Fountain Valley.
See page "!"
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice
submitted by Hydro Conduit Corporation in the amount of
$168,284.45, against A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba
Co., a Joint Venture, contractor for the Knott Interceptor,
Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18
(m) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice
submitted by C. D. Barlow dba Pioneer Jacking Company in
the amount of $24,566.85, against A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. &
N. M. Saliba Co., a Joint Venture, contractor for the Knott
Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18
DISTRICTS 3 & 11
(n) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit
engineering proposals for preparation of right-of-way document
maps and records for the respective Districts
DISTRICT 5
(o) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-152-5, authorizing the
increase of connection charges established by Ordinance
No. 507, effective January 1, 1976. See page "J"
DISTRICT 6
(p) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of
Halecrest Park, Inc., dated October 1, 1975, in the amount of
$2,918.00, for alleged damage to sewer lateral, and refer
to the District's liability insurance carrier for appropriate
action, as recommended by the General Counsel
DISTRICT 7
(q) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 11
and a Portion of Reach 12, Contract No. 7-6-7, approving a
deduction of $1,192.00 from the contract with Rogers & Davies,
due to an adjustment of engineer's quantities. See page "K"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5)
-4-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4)
DISTRICT 7 (continued)
fl LE ••.•.•..••••••••••
;{··;;;-:::-~
~v.·-···-
A/C •••• TKLR _ .....
} ·~ . ' .. ~~ .. r.·~ (~ ..... ~ ... ..
~R .~:::t.:. .. . , "-· ,._,
A/C •••• TJClR --
~ . , '-) ¥"' -.l..~-;:;····:--y-.
\' r,i;.J
I
( F~~.:;~··--7
\JE!E.R .... ~-
A/C •••. TKLR -
····---··-··-·-----
---
(r) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-153-7, accepting Tustin-Orange
Trunk Sewer, Reach 11 and a Portion of Reach 12, Contract
No. 7-6-7, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of
Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "L"
(s) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 75-154-7, approving
plans and specifications for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion
of Reach 12, Reach 13 and Portion of Reach 14, Contract No. 7-6-8,
and authorizing advertising for bids on December 16, 1975
(t) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-155-7, accepting Grant of
Easement from Tustin Construction Co., Inc. re Tract No. 5448,
and authorizing execution of Quitclaim Deed to Tustin Construction
Co., Inc. for portion of similiar easement in consideration therefor
See page "M"
DISTRICT 11
(u) Consideration of motion wa1v1ng irregularity on bid of Clifford L.
Thompson Construction Company (bidder failed to sign bid document);
and approving Standard Resolution No. 75-156-11, to receive and
file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract to
Remodel Newland-Hamilton Pumping Station Facilities, Contract No.
ll-4R, to Clifford L. Thompson Construction Company, in the amount
of $19,821.00. See page "N"
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
-5-
(11)
~,~
(12)
~ . ,
fllE J.:t..~:.-
t.ETT!R ···-··-··-·
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to
receive and file the Committee's \ffitten report
ALL DISTRICTS
(a)
we .... TKtR •••• fr\\$
Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report and
recommendation regarding acquisition of Three Sets of Centrifuge
Bowl-Head Skimmers and Two Sets of Rotating Elements, Specification
No. E-077. See page "0" ----------
.. @ ~-
Consideration of Resolution No. 75-157, authorizing execution of
purchase contract with Bird Machine Company for three sets of
centrifuge bowl-head skimmers and appurtenances, in the amount of
$31,087 plus tax and freight, and two sets of rotating elements,
in the amount of $172,260 plus tax and freight, in form approved
by the General Counsel. See page "P"
I.ETTER ....... ~.?" Call Vote or Cast
Unanimous Ballot
A/C •••• TKLR •••• W $ w~~.:>-~:.:.~ "'~ tv\.t --¥,,_ (13) ALL DISTRICTS 9-~---Y' Ml> (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-145, establishing procedures
LETTER ...••• R.oJLCall Vote or Cast for the collection of delinquent obligations owing to the Districts.
A.IC .•.• TKLR -~animous Ballot See page "Q"
ti\\> (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-146, appointing representatives
for the Districts to act as agents on their behalf in the Small
Claims Court of the West Orange County Judicial District. See
Roll Call Vote or Cast
FILE ···········-·unanimous Ballot
LETTER ·······-·-
A/C .... TKLR ··-
·--··-······-·-( 14)
-·-·-···--
FILE ···············-
LETTER ···-·········
A/C •••• TKLR ••••
't-1 .. (l .~.' I "" -'2-.: _______ _
page "R"
ALL DISTRICTS
~Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report and
recommendation on Sale of Digested Sewage Sludge, Specification
No. S-016. See page "S" ~ ~ c\.. )\.c).....:._Q
(b) onsideratio i.--t:r:i:--fl.40:~
Roll Call Vote or Cast
-····-··-··1:hmJimous Ballot
ag
Sludge, "T"
FILEP .•. J.t.._ ~ALL DISTRICTS LETTER·······--~ Staff report and discussion regarding "Section 208" planning for the
we .... TKLR ··-Southern California area (area-wide planning pursuant to the provisions
--··-··-·····-···-of the 1972 Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act) .0 "n _. /\O ... ;...,,.
See page "U" (also see report enclosed with agenda material) r~ ~ ~.
,~ ~.;. (16)
FILE ···-······-----...-<"--. '·
' lErrER •• ~ •• .:.:..... V --_..,.,-
A/C .... TKLR ""1<\ \ s
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file Annual Report submitted
by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., Certified Public Accountants,
for the year ending June 30, 1975, previously mailed to Directors
by auditors
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion waiving formal bidding provisions of Purchasing
Resolution No. 74-98, and authorizing the General Manager to issue a
purchase order to the lowest bidder for Parts to Rebuild Engine No. 10
at Plant No. 2 (PW-048) in an amount not to exceed $9,000 plus tax and
freight
-6-
(IS) ALL D~ST~ICTS
Second reading on Proposed Ordinance Establi~hing Regulations for Use
of District Sewerage Facilities (Copy enclosed with agenda material)
(a) Consideration of motion to read the following ordinances, by
title only, and waiving reading of said ordinances in their
entirety (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors
present in each District):
N\ \S DISTRICT 1 -Ordinance No. 103, an Ordinance Establishing
Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities .... ...., /,/ \,~~.:---·-··-
\.ETTER •••••••.••. -
>JC ••• :~Ul -~l.s
It\}')
"'' 5>
rv\l.r
('1\)5
~ls
@)
(c)
ROLL CALL VOTE ......... -..i d)
ROLL CALL VOTE .••• ~-
ROLL CALL VOTE .......... -
ROLL CALL VOTE ......... --
ROLL CALL \'DTE ···-··-...-
ROLL CALL VOTE .••••••••• -
;, ---CALL VOTE .. .._
DISTRICT 2 -Ordinance No. 204, an Ordinance Establishing
Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities
DISTRICT 3 -Ordinance No. 305, an Ordinance Establishing
Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities
DISTRICT 5 -Ordinance No. 508, an Ordinance Establishing
Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities
DISTRICT 6 -Ordinance No. 603, an Ordinance Establishing
Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities
DISTRICT 7 -Ordinance No. 716, an Ordinance Establishing
Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities
DISTRICT 11 -Ordinance No. 1103, an Ordinance Establishing
Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities
Staff report
Discussion
DISTRICT 1
DISTRICT 2
DISTRICT 3
DISTRICT 5
DISTRICT 6
DISTRICT 7
-Consideration of roll call vote adopting Ordinance
No. 103, an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for
Use of District Sewerage Facilities
-Consideration of roll call vote adopting Ordinance
No. 204, an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for
Use of District Sewerage Facilities
-Consideration of roll call vote adopting Ordinance
No. 305, an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for
Use of District Sewerage Facilities
-Consideration of roll call vote adopting Ordinance
No. SOB, an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for
Use of District Sewerage Facilities
-Consideration of roll call vote adopting Ordinance
No. 603, an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for
Use of District Sewerage Facilities
-Consideration of roll call vote adopting Ordinance
No. 716, an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for
Use of District Sewerage Facilities
DISTRICT 11 -Consideration of roll call vote adopting Ordinance
No. 1103, an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for
Use of District Sewerage Facilities
-7-
(19) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to convene in executive session re employer and
employee wage and benefit negotiations q :~ O -to~ e<:)
(20) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to reconvene in regular session
(21) ALL DISTRICTS
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
· Roll.~ Vote or Cast
<f.IL.~--'ijfiinir11(lt!S Ballot
...... )t .. v...W1./ ~tmE~.-·-~"·········-
A/C •••. TICLR ··-
-··--··-··-·--( 29)
Other business and commt.mications or supplemental agenda items, if any
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn 'o ~ o "2
tal agenda items, if any
DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn \o·.o'2.
ntal agenda items, if any
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjoum10·.0'"2,.
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 75-158-2, to receive and file
bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Santa Ana
River Interceptor Sewer (Gypsum Canyon Road to Orange Col.lllty Line),
Reaches 6, 7 & B, Contract No. 2-14-5, to S. S. Zarubica, in the
amot.mt of $2,096,676.15. See page "V"
(30) DISTRICT 2
·, .. ·.:v
fR.E " ' (31)
lETI'ER ·---··-
" v"
A/C ~-~~R .. M. \.S
-··-·---··-··-··---(32)
Consideration of motion to adjourn 1D~b~
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from City of Costa
Mesa, dated October 27, 1975, requesting waiver of connection fees, and
refer to staff for study and report back to the Board. See page "W"
items, if any
(33) DISTRICT 7
(34)
~all Vote or Cast
~animous Ballot
FILE: --• /Yl/)
LETTER -r
A/C •••• TIClR -
--····---..M
Consideration of motion to adjourn >O·.Q.3
DISTRICT 5
Consideration of Resolution No. 75-159-5, approving inclusion of the
Board of Supervisors of Orange Cotmty as an additional member agency of
the Newport-Irvine Waste Management Planning Agency, in accordance with
the conditions set forth in the Board of Supervisors' Resolution No. 75-1431.
See pages "X" "Y" , and "Z"
-8-
(35)
agenda items, if any
(36) DISTRICT 5
(37)
f11.E :20:~--
LETT£R ............ -
l>JC ••.. ll(\.I ··•·
#.:..'?..: .. ~
--·-··" .....
(38)
(39)
Consideration of motion to adjourn 10:. 0 3
DISTRICT 3
(a) Report of the General Col.lllsel regarding payment to the City of
Los Alamitos for engineering and inspection fees in connection
with construction of the Westside Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25,
26 and Portion of 27, Contract No. 3-21-1. See page "AA"
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing payment to the City of
Los Alamitos in the amount of $4,000 for engineering and
inspection fees in connection with construction of the Westside
Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 and Portion of 27, Contract
No. 3-21-1, as recommended by the General Cotmsel
al agenda items, if any
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn ,c ~o.5
-9-
• I
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
JOINT BOARDS
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS
NOVEMBER 12~ 1975 -7:30 P.M.
ALL DISTRICTS
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
(8) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating
and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund accounts payable check registers
for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing
par-ent of clail!'.s listed on page "!" ; a!ld approvi!lg account5
payable check regis~ers for signa~ure oi ~ne Chair-m~1 oi ~h~
respective District, and authorizing payment of said claims listed
on the pages indicated below:
BIS'fRICT 1 ,,·erl."aHts, if any ......................•..••. NONE
DISTRICT 2 warrants -See page "II"
DISTRICT 3 warrants -See page "II"
BIS'fRICTS 3 & 11 ~ttspen~e ftmd warre"ts, if any ....•... NONE
DISTRICT S wantmts, if eH~'. • . • . • . • • • • • • • • • • . • . • . . • • • . . NONE
DISTRICTS 5 & 6 suspense fund warrants -See page "II"
fHSTRI CT 6 ·war"raftts, if eHy. . . • . . • . • . . . • • • . . • • • • • • • • . . • NONE
DISTRICT 7 warrants -See page ___ '_'I_I_I_" __ _
·DISTRICT 11 war:r·eftts, if aft)' •••••.••••••••••••••••••••• NONE
•
WARRANT NO.
27420
27421
27422
27423
27424
27425
27426
27427
2742 8
274 29
27430
27431
27432
27433
27434
27435
27436
27437
27438
27439
27440
27441
27442
27443
27444
27445
27446
27447
27448
2744 9
27450
27451
27452
27453
27454
27455
27456
27457
27458
27459
27460
274bl
27462
27l.J63
27l.J64
27l.J65
27l.J66
27467
274b8
27469
27471
27472
27473
"1-1"
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
ABC Metals Supply, Inc., Brass $
Admiral Corporation, Refrigerators & Equip. Repair
Aerial Map Industries, Printing
Air California, Air Fare, Various Meetings
All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings, V-Belts & Bushings
Allied Supply Company, Valves
Alpine Aromatics, Inc., Odor Control
American Chemical Society, Technical Journal
American Cyanamid Company, Test Materials
Amoco Reinforced Plastics Co., Pipe
City of Anaheim, Power
Anaheim Sewer Construction, Lateral Repair
The Anchor Packin g CQ., Inc., Pump Packing
Andrews Hardware & Metal Co., Hardware & Tools
Applied Science Labs., Inc., Lab Supplies
Artesia Implements & Parts Co., Equipment Parts
Ralph W. Atkinson Company, Barscreen Parts
Bank of America, Coupon Collection
Banning Battery Co mpany, Batteries
Barnes & Delaney, Barscreen Parts
Beach City Dodge, Truck Parts
Beckman Instruments, Controls
John G. Bell Co., Barscreen Parts
Bell Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supplies
Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair
Benz Engineering, Inc., Compressor Parts
Bird Machine, Freight
Blue Diamond Materj_Rls : Paving MRte~iAls
Bomar Magneto Service, Inc. Magneto Repair
Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams
C & R Reconditioning Company, Compressor Repair
CS Comp any, Seals, Valves & Pump Parts
Cal-Glass for Research, Inc., Lab Supplies
Cal State Seal Company, Gaskets
Cal's Cameras, Photo Processing & Supplies
California Auto Refinishers , Hardware
California Association of Sanitat i on Agencies, Insurance
Study
Art Carr Trans mi ss i on , .Truck Repa i r
Case Power & Equipment, Equipment Parts
Certified Laboratories, Cleaner
Brian Chuchua.'s Four Wheel Jeep, Truck Parts
Clark Equipment Company, Equipment Parts
Clyde's Repair Shop, Truck & Tractor Repair
Coast Nut & Bolt, Barscreen Parts & Hardware
Coast Roof Company, Roof Repair
College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials
Commercial & CB Communications, Communica t ion Equipment
Congressional Staff Directory, Government Manual
Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electric Supplies
Consolidated Bolt & Nut Co., Freight
F. B.·Cook Corp., Station Repair
Leelon L. Cory, Employee Mileage
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
AGENDA ITEM #8
AMOUNT
35.91
43 9 .28
35 .4 6
502.65
406. 47
164.89
1, 060 . 0()
30 . 00
6 964.27
323.30
13 .67
225.0 0
188.79
536.14
55.45
206.86
89 .86
79.60
519.25
68 9 .00
80.25
1,317.83
371.97
92·.64
330.40
334.51
11.35
102.82
208.65
13.00.
505.00
269.61
325.50
23.98
169.36
131.33
1,050.00
398.08
51 .62
122.78
140.67
25.51
600.61
196.23
187.00
48.91
152.64
24.50
2, 736.41
44.42
200.00
7.50
271.38
"I-1" ·
WARMN'I 1 NO.
27474
27475
27476
0 7477
,.,_.'4 78
27479
27480
27481
27482
27483
27484
27485
27486
27487
27488
27489
27490
27491
27492
27493
27494
27495
27496
27497
27498
27499
27500
27501
27502
27?03
27504
27505
27506
27507
27508
27509
27510
27511
27512
27513
27514
27515
27516
27517
27518
27519
27520
27521
27522
27523
27524
27525
27527
"1-2"
IN FAVOR OF
Costa Mesa County Water District, Water
Crest Leasing, Vehicle Lease
Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab 'Supplies
Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage.
Curtin Matheson Scientific, Lab Supplies
Daily Pilot, Bid Notice S-016
Data Supplies & Systems, Inc., Printing
Economy Crane Rental Service, Crane Rental c. R. Davis Supply Co., Hose & V-Belts
Derby's Topsoil, Building Materials
Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling
AMOUNT
6.oo
147.28
40.00
11.70
376.02
8.79
l,026.J7
357.00
209.37
74.20
Diamond-Newport Ice Co., Industrial Waste Sampling Supplies
Diana Distributors, Cleaner
685. 00
15.90
246.72
34. 74
46.81
Nick Di Benedetto, Employee Mileage
Dollinger Corp., Freight
Dominguez Marine & Industrial, Pipe
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies
Eco Air Products, Filters
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Services
Essick Machinery Co., Compressors
Esterline Angus, Recorder
Filter Supply Co., Pump Parts
Fischer & Porter Company, Valves, Pump Parts &
Meter Repair
Fisher Controls.Company, Regulator Parts
Fontainebleau Hotel, WPCF Conference Expense
City of Fountain Valley, Plant.Water
France Products Division, Compressor Repair
Edward R. Francis, Pl-16 Engine Testing
Freeway Machine and Weldin~ Shop_~ Machinin~
Frost Engineering Service Co., Pump Parts
City of Fullerton, District Water
GAF Corporation, Blueprint Machine Repair
Garden Grove Lumber & Cement Co., Building Materials
Gardner Denver Co., Pump Parts
Garrett Industrial Supply Co., Tools
Gemini Batteries, Batteries
General Binding Corp., Maintenance Agreement
General Electric Supply, Electric Supplies
General Pump Service, Inc., Pump
Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine
General Telephone Company of America
Goldenwest Fertilizer Co., Grit Removal
M. E. Gray Company, Valves & Pipe Supplies
Graybar Electric Co., Electric Supplies
Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Parts
L. C. Gysin, Employee Mileage
Harrisons & Crosfield, Coagulants
Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal
Hennig, Inc., Truck Repair
·Hercules Incorporated, Test Materials
Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease
Hewlett Packard, Equipment Maintenance
Hoffman's Nason Paint Store, Paint Supplies
AGENDA ITEM i,l8
365.13
592.06
154.58
3,000.00
360.61
331. 77
26.43
3,785.46
116.76
313.12
40.00
231.87
767.70
817.28
126.95
5.82
58.oo
267.27
310.95
68.90
299.77
151.74
930.57
2,806.88
12,670.40
4,156.74
1,890.00
133.61
852.68
20.16
8.70
13,088.88
140.00
90.70
7,739.00
1,515.61
82.68
126.78
"l-2"
WARRANT NO.
27528
27529
27530
27531
27532
27533
27534
27535
27536
27537
27538
27539
27540
27541
27542
27543
27544
27545
27546
27547
27548
27549
27550
27551
27552
27553
27554
27555
27556
27~C::..7 27558
27559
27560
27561
27562
27563
27564
27565
27566
27567
27568
27569
27570
27571
27572
27573
27574
27575
27576
27577
27578
27579
27580
27581
27582
27583
275~4
27585
"1-3"
IN FAVOR OF
Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires
Honeywell, Inc., Metering Supplies
House of Batteries, Batteries
Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies, Rope & Tools
Hundley Company, Inc., Controls
City of Huntington Beach, Distrtct & Plant Water
Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Equipment Rental
I-C Electronis, Electric Supplies
Ingersol-Rand, Compressor Parts & Tool Repair
Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware
Instrumentation Specialities, Test Equipment
International Business Mach.ine, Office Supplies
International Harvester Co., Truck Parts
Irvine Ranch Water District, Water
Jensen Instrument Company, Switches
Johnston Pump Co., Pump Parts
Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies & Valve
Keen-Kut Abrasive Co., Hardware
Kelly Pipe Company, Pipe Supplies
King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, Bushings & Conveyor Parts
Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts
Kisling Construction Co., Raise Manholes & Sewer Repair
Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware, Tools & Chain
L.A. Water Treatment, Valve Parts
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tools, Hardware & Valves
L & N Uniforms Supply Company, Uniform Service
Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Sweeper & Truck Parts
Larry's Bldg. Materials, Inc., Building Materials
Judy Lee, Ernployee Mileage
Lewco 'Fi~lectri.c Company~ Truck RepA.ir
Lewis Brothers Battery, Batteries
Los Angeles Times, Industrial Waste Notice
McKinley Equipment Corp., Operating Supplies
Master Blueprint & Supply, Drafting Supplies & Printing
Mayday Tool & Supply Company, Tools & Rope
Mobil Oil Corporation, Grease
Moore Systems, Inc., Controls
Morgan Equipment Company, Equipment Parts
Mortarless Block, Inc., Building Materials
Motorola, Inc., Batteries
N B Products, Pipe Supplies
Nalco Chemica..L Company, Chemicals
National Chemsearch, Cleaner
National Lumber Supply, Building Materials & Hardware
Nelson-Dunn, Inc., Pump Parts
City of Newport Beach, Plant & District Water
Nolex Corp., Reproduction Paper
M. C. Nottingham Co., Inc., Lateral Repair
Occidental College, Trawl Charter
Ole's Home Center, Anti-Freeze
·city of Orange, Water
Orange County Chemical Co., Ammonia
Orange County Equipment Co., Equipment Parts
Orange County Farm Supply Co., Landscape Supplies
Orange County Hose Co., Tubing
Orange County Steel, Scrap Sale Refund
Oreo Block Co., Inc., Building Materials
Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies
AGENDA ITEM #8 ..
"' AMOUNT
1,164.50
83.08
129.15
3,448.55
132.r)o ~
l~R.~2 76.32
3 .89
864.62
192.19
329.14
32.89
36.52
3.50
79.48
246.98
2,239.20
114.93
22.22
2,133.89
2,705.30
4,695.00
332.67
·123.12
1,033.01
3,723.88
301.05
79.39
46.17
28. 38
86.81
160.72
252.81
228. 96
329.10
52.31
150.26
24.59
8~.68
203.52
1,01~.97
1~982.68
1,241.79
136.54
16.55
316.88
743.78
105.00
400.00
220.69
54.29
31.80
64.46
58.51
12. 24._.,
2,042.79
17.81
482.20
"1-3"
WARRANT'' NO.
27586
27587
27588
27589
~7590
~7591
27592
27593
27594
27595
27596
27597
27598
27599
27600
27601
27602
27603
27604
27605
27606
27607
27608
27609
27610
27611
27612
27613
27614
27615
27616
27617
27618
27619
27620
27621
27622
27623
27624
27625
27620
27627
27628
27629
27630
27631
27632
27633
27634
27635
27636
27637
27638
539
~640
27641
27642
"1-4"
IN FAVOR OF
Pacific Telephone Company
Pako Corporation, Equipment Maintenance
MC Patten Corporati.on, Compressor Parts & Gauges
Pent, Mnrwick, Mitchell & Co., EDP Consultant
Jose Pena, Weed Abatement
Perkin-Elmer, Lab Supplies & Equipment Repair
Pickwick Paper Prodllcts, Jan j_ tori.al Supplies
Printec Corporatlon, Reproduction Supplies
Production Pallet Company, Inc., Pallets
The Pryor Giggey Co., Building Materials
RFL, Inc., Filters
Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal
Red Valve Company, Inc., Valves
The Register, Bid Notices S-014 & 11-4-R & Industrial
Waste Notice
Rhodia Company, Odor Control
Richey Electronics, Inc., Electric Supplies
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motor
Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies
Science Essentials Supplies, Sampling Supplies
Science Products, Lab Supplies
City of Seal Beach, District Water
Seal Black Co., Inc., Paving Materials
Sensorex, Inc., Test Equipment
S. F. Serrantino, Employee Mileage
Sesco, Building Materials
Shepherd Machinery Co., Equipment Parts
Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies
John Sigler, Employee Mileage
Smith Emery Co., Pipe Inspection
Southern California Edison Company
South Orange Supply, Piping Supplies
Southern California Gas Company
Southern California Water Company
Southern Distributors Corp., Building Materials
Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp. Bottled Water
Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Standard Oil Company of Calif., Oil Diesel Fuel & Gasoline
Star-Lite Barricade, Barricade Rental
Starow Steel, Steel
Sterling Art & Engineering~ Drafting Supplies
Sterling Power Systems, Inc., Pump Parts
Sun Electric Corporation, Tools
Sunnen Products Co., Maintenance Supplies
The Suppliers, Tools
J. Wayne Sylvester, .Director of Finance, Petty Cash Reimb.
T-Girl Temporary Employment, Temporary Warehouse Help
T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Equip. Parts & Tractor Rental
Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage
Taylor-Dunn, Electric Supplies & Equipment Parts
~ektronix, Inc., Equipment Parts
C. o. Thompson Petroleum Co., Kerosene
Tony's Lock & Safe Service, Lock Repair
Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts
Two Guys, Photo Equipment
Union Oil Company of California, Gasoline
United Auto Parts, Truck Parts
United Parcel Service, Freight-out
AGENDA ITEM #8
AMOUNT
5011. 23
86.23
6811. 21
l1g5. 00
");),). 00
8~4.24
p, 11. 20
387. 54
P.111. 08
688. 47
4 .=s6. 4 3
130.08
403.17
400.25
2,127.50
128.18
80.35
867.41
74.99
93.58
46.06
5e.30
59.36
38.82
173.84
401.32
746.52
12.90
104.oo
52,349.55
612.15
711.15
4.67
45. 79
142.25
551.67
6,510.68
41.00
243.58
132.99
38.87
66.14
107.27
535.59
687.67
645.01
858.92
139.02
122.48
48.64
100.64
4.51
772.04
15.89
180.63
li.t6.25
63'. 51
"1-4"
WARRANT NO.
27643
27644
27645
27646
27647
27648
27649
27650
27651
27652
27653
27654
27655
27656
27657
27658
276?9
27660
27661
27662
27663
27664
27665
27666
27667
27668
27669 27670
27671
')'7~7~ L-IVl'-
27673
II I -5"
IN FAVOR OF
United Reprographics, Inc., Printlng
Unlted States Elevator Corp., MaintenAnce Agreement
United States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts
University of CaliforniR Extension, Training
Utilities Supply Company, Tools
Vaniman Camera, Photo Processing & Supplies
Van Waters & Rogers, Chemicals
VRW Scientific, Lab Supplies
Varec, Inc., Freight
Video Pipe Grouting, Inc., Pipe Inspection
Paul Vukich, Employee Mileage
Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage
John R. Waples, R.S., Odor Consultant
Warren and Bailey Co., Inc., Hardware
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts
Western Salt Company, Salt
Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Supplies
Wilshire Chemical Co., Lab Supplies
Wilson Ford Sales, Truck Parts
Wilson Paper Company, Aluminum Foil
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
World Travel Bureau, Inc., Air Fare, Various Meetings
Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage
Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing
Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Services
Everett H. York Company, Filters
F. T. Ziebarth Company, Bypass Relocation
Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electric Supplies
;::~:~~,...E:::+ ... ~::c Supply, ~lect~ic Supplies
.i.uov.i. u.mcn1.1a.1..1.Lou Specialities, ·r·es1:; f;quipmen-c
John M. Wright, Employee Mileage
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING
AGENDA ITEM #8
,
AMOUNT
20.00
27.00
88.51
6li .. ')O
63.04 ~
107.79
5' 1131. 41
3115. 44
22 .42
250.00
9.75
31.50
549.10
20.35
1,939.27
108.26
1,027.77
454.47
9.02
38.27
4 '741.00
1,102.56
45.18
6,870.01
2,061.56
270.08
8,522.00
168.77 ".)sh ,s
..) -v ......
~'-'' r-r .)UV.:J:J
22.50
$ 232,981.85
"l-5"
WARRANT NO.
27370
·371
~372
27373
27374
27375
27376
27377
27378
27379
27380
27381
27382
27383
27384
27385
27386
273e7
27388
27389
27390
27391
27392
27393
27394
27395
27396
27397
27398
27399
27400
27401
27402
27403
27404
27405
27406
27407
27408
27409
27410
27411
27412
27413
27Lt14
27415
27416
27417
27418
27419
"I-6"
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Artesia Implements & Parts Co., Tractor A-078 & Tools$
Ruth Bailey, Public Info. Workshop Leader
Belmont Engineering, JPL Tanks & Clarifiers
Janet Bloch, Public Info. Workshop Leader
John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Services, ACTS, Fae. Plan
Cheesman's Bench Rack Co., Cabinets
Cleveland Mixer Corp., JPL Mixers
Jane Cook, Public Info. Workshop Leader
Jean Dahlmont, Public Info. Workshop Leader
Daily Pilot, JPL Workshop Notice
Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16
Jacqueline Dvorman, Public Info. Workshop Leader
Enviro Development Co., Inc., JPL Filter
Karen Everts, Public Info. Workshop Leader
Ruth Finley, Public Info. Workshop Leader
Forkert Engineering, Engineering P2-8-3
J. B. Gilbert & Associates, EIS Facilities Plan
Grieve Corp., Electric Supplies
J. Putnam Henck, Contractor, JPL-ACTS
Hipotronics, Tester
Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Management Pl-16
Hoffman & Heartt, Drill Press
Karen Kallay, Public Info. Workshop Leader
Pat Kenwrothy, Public Info. Workshop Leader
Dorothy King, Public Info. Workshop Leader
LBWS, Inc., Welding Torch
L.A. Opinion, JPL Workshop Notice
Judy Medler, Public Info. Workshop Leader
Merle Moshiri, Public Info. Workshop Leader
Motorola, Inc., Corrununication Equipment
NASA-Pasadena Office, JPL Training &.Services
Jane Oseid, Public Info. Workshop Leader
Fern Prikle, Public Info. Workshop Leader
Production Systems, Inc., Electric Equipment
The Register, Workshop Insertion, Notice PW-046
Scholl & Co. Advertising, Public EIS Workshop
Lola Seymour_, Public Info. Workshop Leader
Smith Emery Company, Testing Pl-16
Southern Calif. Testing Lab, Testing Pl-16
Jacqueline Streeter, Public Info. Workshop Leader
Sun Electric Corporation, Tools
Sun Litho, Facilities Plan Prints
Sunnen Products Co., Motor
The Suppliers, Drill Press & Tools
Barbara Tooley, Public Info. Workshop Leader
Jeannette Turk, Public Info. Workshop Leader
Twining Laboratories, Testing Pl-16
·uniloc, Inc., Test Equipment
Jerri West, Public Info. Workshop Leader
F. T. Ziebarth Company, Contractor PW-043
AMOUNT
10,5)3.22
2.:J. 00
99,582.89
20.00
55,536.65
L186. 05
18,645.31
45.00
25.00
313.90
l,829,022.Lt2
20.JO
115,682.l.JO
20.00
105.00
3,334.48
6,711.59
554.42
102,150.57
1,772.90
12,328.86
2,022.81
20.00
20.00
20.00
186.21
312.52
20.00
20.00
3,814. 93.
19,980.56
20.00
25.00
1 .. 011.24
3:672.19
4,192.42
25.00
130.00
212.76
20.00
Lt96.08
3,538.00
2,273.09
1,336.84
20.00
45.00
13.50
87li. 50
25.00
21,755.70
TOTAL CORF $2,323,014.0l
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF $2,555,995.86
AGENDA ITEM #8 "l-6" .
DISTRICT NO. 2
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
27348 Donahue ~ Co., Appraisal Fee, 2-14
27349 J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation, Contractor 2-15
27350 George Miller Construction Company, Contractor 2-16-1
27351 The Register, Bid Notice 2-14-3A, 2-14-4A, 2-14-5
27352 Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 2-15
27353 Southern California Testing Laboratory, Soils Testing 2-16-1
DISTRICT NO. 3
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
27354 Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 3-18, 3-20-1, 3-30-2, 3-21-1
27355 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-18, 3-20-1, 3-20-2, 3-21-1
27356 "Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 3-20-1, 3-20-2, 3-21-1
27357 Southern California Testing Laboratory, Soils Testing 3-20-1
27358 Sully Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 3-20-1
27359 A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N. M. Saliba, Contractor 3-18, 3-20-2, 3-21-1
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6
SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
27369 Portigal & Hammerton, Legal Services 5-19
"I I" AGENDA ITEM #~ .
$
AMOUNT
2,950.00
79, 718. 72
39,555.27
314.50
156.00
308.87
$ 123,003.36
$ 20,359.50
1J341. 37
10,679.50
811. 20
455,347.50
968,785.78
$ 1,457,324.85
$ 126.56
"II"
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
27360 A. S. Peich, Inc., Refund Dewatering Permit
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
27361 Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 7-6-6, 7-6-8
27362 Melvin W. Brue, Refund Duplicate Permit Payment
27363 County of Orange, Compaction Testing
27364 Eugene Leviton, Refund Permit Overpayment
27365 Rogers & Davies, Contractor 7-6-7
27366 Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 7-6-7
27367 John Strader, Refund Duplicate Permit Payment
27368 L. L. Tasch, Refund Duplicate Permit Payment
"III" AGENDA ITEM #8
$
$
AMOUNT
1,250.00
8,603.20
200.00
114 .42
20.00
6,492.00
104.00
100.00
200.00
$ 15,833.62
$ 17,083.62
"Ill"
. ..
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
November 12, 1975 -7:30 P.M.
. -
"A-1"
JOHN CAROLLO
PHOENIX
ARIZONA
WALNUT CREEK
CALIFORNIA
ENGINEERS
SANTA ANA
CALIFORNIA
JOHN A. CAROLLO, P. E. < 1906°1971 >
H. HARVEY HUNT, P.E.
HOWARD M. WAY, P.E.
ROBERT G. WILLIAMS, P.E.
WALNUT CP.EEK PLAZA, SUITE 750
1990 NORTH CALIFORNIA BLVD
WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94596
AREA CODE: •4151 932-1710
DONALD R. PREISLER, P.E.
GAIL P. LYNCH. P.E.
WAL TEAR. HOWARD, P.E.
Mr. Fred A. Harper
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
10844 Ellis Ave.
Fountain Valley, California 92708
October 2 1, 19 7 5
Subject: Proposal for Engineering Services -Surg~ Tower
Extension at Plant No .. 2
In accordance with the request of Mr. Ray Lewis and
Nick DiBenedetto, we are submitting herewith this proposal to
accomplish engineering services you require in connection with
the subject project. We understand the scope of the project to be
generally as set forth below. The estimated construction cost for
this work is $75, 000.
SCOPE OF PROJECT
1. Extend Surge Tower No. 2 by 30 feet.
2. Provide for stairway to top with observation
platform at top.
3. Extension to be steel and painted.
SCOPE OF WORK
We propose to furnish the following engineering wot"k and
services to the Districts in connection with design and construction
of the subject project.
1. Hold detailed co:q.ferences with the Districts' staff
to review and discuss the project.
2. Prepare final design contract drawings, in pencil, on
mylar. Plans to be reproduced by the Districts.
3. Prepare contract detailed specifications, bid proposals,
and other documents to be included with the Districts 1
standard general provisions and specifications.
Specifications to be reproduced by the Districts.
4. Prepare a final cost estimate.
AGENDA ITEM #9(A) -ALL DISTRICTS II A-1"
"A-2"
Mr. Fred A. Harper
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
Page 2
October 21, 1975
5. Assist the Districts in securing and tabulating bids,
analyzing bid r-esults, and furnishing recommendations
on award.
6. Furnish general consultation and advice to the Districts
as requested during construction. Districts to furnish
supervision of construction and on job inspection.
7. Prepare supplementary sketches on design, if required,
to resolve field conditions encountered.
8. Review detailed construction drawings, shop erection
drawings, and equipment and materials sub~.ttals for
compliance with the design concept. Make recommenda-
tions to the Districts regarding approval of submittals.
9. Accompany the Districts inspection personnel on final
inspection and submit final report on the completed
project.
10. Prepare contract record drawings, which shall mean
that whe11 conetr 1~1ction work h~s bee~ cc~Flcted 2.!'!d
accepted by the Districts, Engineer shall supply to the
Districts, to become the Districts 1 property, the original
tracings of all plans for the work, modified to include
any changes made during construction. Modifications to
the original tracings will be based upon info rma ti on supplied
to the Engineer by the resident engineer and resident staff
employed by the Districts to furnish construction inspection.
SCHEDULING
We propose to accomplish the above scope of work \Items
I through 10) in accordance with scheduling to be mutually agreed
upon by the Districts and ourselves. We can complete plans,
· specifications and final estimate within 60 days after notice to
proceed.
FEE
We propose to provide the engineering services described
above for a lump sum of $6, 500. We suggest that payments be made
monthly, with 10% retention of said payments until completion of plans
and specifications, with the retained 10% being payable as follows:
5% upon completion and submittal to the Districts of plans
and specifications.
AGENDA ITEM #9(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "A-2"
: .
Mr. Fred A. Harper
~ County Sanitation Districts
II A-3"
of Orange County
Page 3
October 21, 1975
5% upon completion of construction and acceptance of the
completed proj ect .. 1
We thank you for the opportunity of presenting this
proposal.
Very truly yours,
HHH:kb
AGENDA ITEM #9(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "A-3"
"B"
B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N
SHEET
Date October 21, 1975 -11:00 A.M.
Contract For: .SANT A AfJA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER
(FROM GROVE STREET TO IMPERIAL HIQ-IWAY)
MANHOLE COVERS AND FRAMES
CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3A
CONTRACTOR
Engineer's Estimate: $3,700.00
TOTAL BID
1. Long Beach Iron Works, Inc.
Long Beach, California $3,604.00
2. John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc.
ParamotL1t $3,700.00
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
AGENDA ITEM #9(B) -DISTRICT 2 . "B"
: .
II C"
B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N
SHEET
Date October 21, 1975 -11:00 A.M.
Contract For: .SANTA mA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER (FROM IMPERIAL HIQ-IWAY TO
GYPSUM CANYON ROAD), MANHOLE COVERS AND FRAMES
CONTRACT NOo 2-14-4A
Engineer's Estimate: $5,180.00
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
1. Long Beach Iron Works, Inc.
Long Beach, California $5,045.60
2. Kasler Corporation and L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc.
A Joint Venture
San Bernardino, California $5,880.00
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
AGENDA ITEM #9(c) -DISTRICT 2 "C" -
"D-1"
JOHN A. ARTUKOV~C~ §ONS, IlNC.
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
16200 SOUTH ATLANTIC PLACE
rc>ST OFFICE BOX ~30 •
PAAAMOUHT. CALIFORNIA 90723
October 21, 1975
Orange County Sanitation District No. 2
10844 Ellis Avenue,
Fountain Valley, Caliiornia
Reference:
\
;
(JU) tii.JJ47 •
Construction of Santa Ana River Interceptor
Sewer and South Santa Ana River Interceptor Connector .
. t
Attention: Mr. Ray Lewis, Chief Engineer.
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to the discussions per ~ur recent telephone conversations
relative to the contract notec?above, we are hereby formally request-
ing the Board of Directors of the Sanitation Districts to accept an
assignment of the contract from the entity of John A. Artukovich Sons,
Inc., the ·1ow bidder and m\"cxdee, to a new entity of John A. Artuko-
vich Sons, Inc., and John A. Artukovich Jr., a Joint Venture.
This request is in deference to the request of our bonding company,
Safeco Insurance Company, .and in lieu of their requesting the personal
general indemnity of John A. Artukovich Jr., and his wife .. A copy ot·
a letter from our bonding agent is enclosed.
By assignment to this joint venture, they will ·have in effect
the same guarantee in that John A. Artukovich Jr., will be liable
only on this contract or any others that are bid in that joint
venture name.
This situation is quite prevalent in the bonding business or
industry today because of the financial situation bonding and
insurance companies are finding themselves in because of the current
economic conditions existing in the country today. Two bonding
companies have become insolvent and declared bankruptcy in California
recently.
Our company has currently approximately $10,000,000.00, ot work
under contract and we are contemplating bidding on some other large
projects both in and out of this country.
AGENDA ITEM #9Cn) -DISTRICT 2 "D-1" ..
..
II D-2"
(JU) •H-J247
Page II
JOHN A. ARTUKOVICIHI §ONS, IlNC.
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
16200 SOUTH ATLANTIC PLACE
ftOST OFFICE BOX 530
PAIU.MOUHT, CALIFORNIA 9D72l
Orange County Sanitaiion District No. 2
Mr. Ray Lewis
Your acceptance ot this assignment would completely satisfy
the ~equest of our bonding company and also give.the District
accitional security in having both principles ori ithe bond.
If there is any other inf onnation necessary to expedite the
above requ·est please let us know as soon as possible.
Very truly yours,
JOHN A. ~RTUKOVICH SONS, INC.,
. Enc: 1
By: Q-71.,,, ~-. (-:::~z: -"--' ~ L.-> . ~' .
(;'ohn A. Artukovi:Cfi, Jr.,:J?resident
. ct(
JAA/r
. AGENDA ITEM #9(n) -DISTRICT 2 "D-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
ONTRACTOR: George Miller Construction Company
PAGE 1 OF 2
OB: Kraemer Boulevard Interceptor Sewer, From Palm Drive to Imperial Highway, Contract No. 2-16-1
Amount of this Change 0 rder (ADD) (H~~~~l) $ 23,394.30
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
ont.ract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the fol lowing additions to or
eductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Contractor's letter of September 3, 1975 and
revised letter.of September 24, 1975
1.
2.
3.
4.
s.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Abandoned 30" strom drain not shown on plans at
Station 188+70 to Station 189+04
18" irrigation line not shown on plans, Station
198+00, 18" storm drain pipe and concrete manhole
in center of sewer trench not shown on plans.
Had to strip out from Station 220+20 to 203+95
24" irrigation R.C.P. not shown on plans at Station
209+50 at Station 197+75. Irrigation line was
shown to 45 approximately 20' west of centerline
of trench. The line did not 45 and remained within·
the trench prism.
2" water main not shown on plans at Station 214+55 ·
approximately 3' deep.
Pacific Telephone cables not shown on plans at
Station 221+18 3.5' in depth.
Pacific Telephone cables not shown correctly on plans.
at Station 228+91. Contractor located cables. Cables
should have been at Station 227+92.
6" oil line and 2" gas line not shown on plans at
Station 243+00
.12" casing 6" oil line inside: 2" gas line not
shown on plans at Station 243+ 75. 6'' General
.Telephone not shown on plans at Station 243+89
16" water line not shown on plans at Station 245+17
"E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(E) DISTRICT 2
$2,827.50
4,911.63
1,115.48
600.00
649.83
800.00
979.12
1,804.84
1,432.95
"E-1'~
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS.AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO.
PAGE 2 OF 2
1
------~----------~~---)N-~CTOR: George Miller Construction Company 0 ATE November 6, 1975
~~~------------------~--
)8: Kraemer Boulevard Interceptor Sewer, From Palm Drive to Imperial Highway, Contract No. 2-16-1
10. 8" oil line not shown on plans at Station 250+10
and 6" General Telephone line not shown on plans
at Station 250+28
11. 10" water line not shown on plans at Station 253+07
12. 7 ail lines not shown on plans between Station 256+50
· to Station .257+25
13. Water lines not shown on plans. 1-4" at Station
258+ 19, 1-3" at Station 258+50, and 1-3" at Station
258+63
14. 4" water line not shown on plans at Station 259+21
TOTAL ADD:
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Change (ADD) ~
Amended Contract Price
)ard authorization date: November 12, 1975 Approved:
1,837.76
1,749.11
2,829.22
1,237.93.
618.93
. $ 2 3, 39 4 • 30
$ 563,936. 80
$ o.oo
$ 2 3, 394. 30
$ 587 J 331.10
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
Consulting Engineer By ________________________________ __
Chief Engineer
Contractor
"E-2" . AGENDA ITEM #9(E) -DISTRICT 2 . "E-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. 2
~------~--~~--~-
:>NTRACTOR: George Miller Construction Company DATE ________ N_o_v_e_mb __ e_r_6_,L--,..1_9_7_5~_'-11 __ _
JB: Kraemer Boulevard Interceptor Sewer, From Palm Drive to Imperial Highway, Contract No. 2-16-1
Amount of thl s Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ o.oo
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
ontract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to ·or
eductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES
ADD:
Item Change Est'd Quantities
No. Unit From To
Sq.Ft. 7, 700 14,400
L. F. 2,589 5,178
DEDUCT:
10 l = ....... 372 0
)ard authorization date: November 12, 1975
'------------------------------------Consulting Engineer
'------------------------------------Contractor
Difference
6,700
2,589
@ $1/Sq.Ft. =
@ $4/L.F. =
Total Add:
9 $4/L.F.
6' 700. 00
10,356.00
17,056.00
l,400.UO
Total Deduct: 1,488.00
TOI'AL ADD: 15,568.00
Original Contract Price $ 563,936.80
--------------------~
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 23,394.30 --------------------
This Change (ADD) (~~ $ 15,568.00 ---------------------
Amended Contract Price $ 602,899.10
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, Califcrnia
By------------------~---~------------Ch i e f Engineer
"F" AGENDA ITEM #9(F) -DISTRICT'2 "F"
"G"
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-16-1 AS CO~LETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO.
2-16-1 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL
CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange
Cot.mty, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, George ~liller Construction Company, has
completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for
KRAEMER BOULEVARD INTERCEPTOR SEWER, PALM DRIVE TO IMPERIAL HIGHWAY, CONTRACT
NO. 2-16-1, on the 21st of October, 1975; and,
Section 2. That by letter, Lowry & Associates, District's engineers, have
recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with
the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the Di.str:i ct ha$ concurred in sai.d
engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and
ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That Kraemer Boulevard Interceptor Sewer, Palm Drive to Imperial
Highway, Contract No. 2-16-1, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with
the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 24th of April, 1975; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with George Miller Construction
Company setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of said Kraemer
Boulevard Interceptor Sewer, Palm Drive to Imperial Highway, Contract No. 2-16-1,
is hereby approved; and,
Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are
hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1975.
AGENDA ITEM #9(G) -DISTRICT 2 II G"
,,.
"H-1"
0 . r-<:~anaheim hills, inc. /:;,.~:~A Subsidiary of Grant Corporation
September 30, 1975
Mr. Fred Harper
General Manager
Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
SUBJECT: Future Development Plans for Anaheim Hills
Dear Mr. Harper:
As a condition of our most recent annexation into Sanitation District No. 2,
Anaheim Hills agreed to provide the Directors of the Sanitation Districts
with a proposed phasing schedule of future annexations to the Sanitation
District.
We had originally p~omised to submit this phasing schedule to you 60 days
after the hearing on our annexation request. Unfortunately, we were
delayed several weeks due to not having our Chief Planner & Engineer
available. We did not want to submit a partially completed or inaccurate
plan for your review. We felt that if we had done that it would do a
disservice to both the Districts and Anaheim Hills.
We have itemized the proposed date of annexation, the gross areas involved
and the total number of projected living units. I believe that these
projections are extremely realistic, however, as we have found in tne recent
past, our projections can vary considerably. Generally, we lose instead
of gain time. Please note that the proposed year of annexation is not
necessarily the date of development. Generally, we anticipate a minimum of
one year lead time from the date of annexation to the time when the first
units would be under construction.
The attached list indicating gross areas includes only those portions of a
development or planning unit which have not been previously annexed to
the District. The number of living units we have indicated corresponds
directly to those found on the General Plan of Development for Anaheim
Hills.
It is our sincere hope that this information will be of benefit to the
District staff and Board of Directors. I would welcome the opportunity
to be present at the time this information is made available to the
Directors to answer any questions they may have concerning our future
phasing.
AGENDA ITEM #9(1) -DISTRICT 2
380 ANAHEIM HILLS ROAD, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92807, PHON6 17141 998-2000
"H-1"
Proposed Date
of Annexation
1976
1976
1976
1977
i9Z7
1977
·1977
1978
1978
1979
1979
1980.
1980
Total Area For:
1976 -220 Acres
1977 -271 "
1978 -351 "
1979 -335 "
1980 -261 "
HJS: 10/2/75
"H-2"
PROPOSED ANNEXATION SCHEDULE FOR
ANAHEIM HILLS PROPERTY PRESENTLY NOT
IN SANITATION DISTRICTS
Planning Unit
Designation Gross Area
I Cl 75 Acres
IX Partial so "
XIX-A Partial 95 ~·
XIX-B 86 "
IX Remainder 60 "
II Partial 30 "
XXIII 95 "
II Remainder 35 "
x 316 "
IV 160 . "
XXII 175 "
XXIV 112 "
III 149 ll
No. of Livin3
180
300
300
500
700
200
300
200
2.530
600
200
150
·860
Total 7,020
Total No. of Living Units
AGENDA ITEM #9(1)
780
1,700
2,730
800
1,010
DISTRICT 2
Units
"H-2"
"H-3"
Mr. Fred Harper, Gen. Mgr.
Sanitation Districts of Orange County
September JO, ..
Page 2
Thank you for bearing with us in delaying this submittal to your agency.
Please call me with any corrunents or questions you may have concerning
this information.
Sincerely yours,
ANAHEIM HILLS, INC.
\\\... \3~
Jags L. Barisic
Vice President
JLB:ls
Enclosures
AGENDA ITEM #9(1) -DISTRICT 2 "H-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108-4-4 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9270.'3
(71.C) 540-2910
November 5, 1975
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Fred A. Harper, General Manager
w. N. Clarke, Superintendent
Sewer Odor Related Problems Within the
City of Fountain Valley
(71.C) 962-2.C l I
The City of Fountain Valley staff and the Sanitation District
staff have received g number of odor complaints relative to the
Districts' interceptor sewers that are in the City of Fountain Valley.
The attached memorandum from John Waples, the Districts' Odor
Consultant, partially addresses the problem and some of the remedial
steps taken to date by the Districts' forces. These steps include
the sealing of manholes in the areas of concern and the installation
of "gas flaps" in the manholes of connecting local sewers. These
flaps, while allowing the sewage to flow from the local sewer into the
interceptor~ restrict the opening above the flow line thereby mini-
mizing the amount of air and/or sewer gases which can travel back
into the local sewer system. ·
We have also held discussions with the consulting firm of
Hugh B. Carter Company regarding the design of an odor control
scrubber and we have developed preliminary criteria necessary to do a
cost and design analysis. Our plan provides for the installation of
a scrubber at Plant No. 1 utilizing an existing District 36-inch pipe
in Ellis Street as a means of collecting the air and gases from the
interceptor sewers at the intersection of Ellis and Bushard. This
approach will enable us to introduce a slightly negative pressure in
the interceptor as far north as Westminster and Golden West Streets
and accomplish the scrubbing on the Plant No. 1 property, thereby
minimizing the need for handling of chemicals offsite. A more
detailed plan, including cost estimates and construction scheduling
will be presented for consideration prior to the December Board
meeting.
It should be pointed out that the odor problems relating to
trunk and interceptor sewers are accentuated during the warm fall
months. This, plus the recent construction of large interceptor
sewers and the necessary diversion of small quantities of flow into
them, have made this probably the Districts worst season for odors
in the past 15 years. We will make every effort to arriye at a
suitable, cost effective plan to treat these problems properly.
"l-1"
'1.lrze~ w. N. Clarke
Superintendent
AGENDA ITEM #9(K) -DISTRICT 3 "I-1"
II I -2"
To: Fred A Harper a!lu Bill Clarke.
From: John R. Waples.
Date: 9-24-75.
Subject: Odor invest~gation along Magnolia Street (Warner to Talbert),F.V
I investigated the area 6:00 P. M. 9-23-75· Due to the excessive
traffic it was difficult to do a thorough job. I did note some odor
at the rr.anhole on the Jl7 trunk line at El Presedente and r1Lagnolia.
There was some odor from the District manholes on the Miller-Holder
line, also, from 1he F.V. manhole at El Presedente.
Wednesday.9-24-75,6,00 A.M.,I checked the above area and there was
less traffic. The condition relative to odor was approx! the same
as .described ~ove. It was noted as the cars drove over the manholes
they pulled odor out,and of course the odor became distributed in
the atmosphere.
7:)0 A.M. ,Richard Fuentes and I checked the records to determine
where and how many connections F. V. had on the the two lines from
Warner to Talbert. There are five connections on each line.
8:00 A. M. ,Richa~d c:-..nd crew proc8cd8d to Talbert ar1d Magnclia. :,·Je
checked the ma.nht.:les east uf r~'lagnolia at Talbert and noted odor
coming from the District manholes. The manhole covers dovm to Bay
Street were sealed, including the one on the Security Nat'l. Bank
parking lot. After these were sealed,! checked the manhole at Oak
Street (.E of Bay) and there was considerable odor coming OJJt. ·rhis
is a relatively heavy populated a.rea,l'v1obile Home pa~k on the S.
As a result of this evidence,Richard contacted Marshall Fairres via
radio and was instructed to continue sealing manholes in the area.
When I left the area at 9:00 A.M. the crew was spraying the manhole
at Magnolia and El Presedente (E side) with odor mask. They were
then going to seal the covers on r·.iiller-Holder and all the F. V.
covers (ten in number).
·There is a good possibility that the odor will now flow into the
collection lines and be vented from the nearest houses. Larry
Williams, F. V, Public :,·'Jerks and I are meeting Bill Clarke in Bill's
office 3:00 P. M. this date to discuss the problem. There is an
unresolved problem on the cul-d-sac at Tahoe Cir., F.V •• It appears
that gas(sewer) is coming from the District line and discharging
from F. V's.manhole.
AGENDA ITEM #9(K) -DISTRICT 3 "1-2"
3:00 p.m. this date:
Larry Williams, Don Bryan, Ron Smith, Fountain Valley rcpresent~tives,
met with Bill Clarke and me in Bill's office. The objective of the
~ meeting was to work cooperatively on the odor problem in the city of
Fountain Valley.
It was resolved that Ron Smith and Mike Mendez (CSDOC) are to
coordinate the installation of "gas flaps" in Fountain Valley collection
lines as they enter the Districts' line. Ron already knows where some
installations are to be made. They will start the project at 7:00 a.m.
on September 25, 1975-
II I-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(K) -DISTRICT 3 "l-3"
"J-1"
RESOLUTION NO. 75-152-5
INCREASING CONNECTION CHARGES ESTABLISHED BY
ORDINANCE NO. 507, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1976
A RESOLlITIO~ OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, INCREASING CONNECTION
CHARGES ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO. 507,
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1976
* * * * *· * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 507 of the District provides that specified
increases in sewer connection charges shall become effective on January 1,
1973, and on each succeeding January 1, provided the Directors of the
District, by resolution, duly so resolve and direct.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 5 does hereby resolve and direct as follows:
Section 1. Effective January 1, 1976, the connection charge for new
construction, family dwelling buildings, as defined by Ordinance No. 507,
shaii be $i75 per dwelling unit.
Section 2. Effective January 1, 1976, the connection charge for new
construction, other than family dwelling buildings, as defined by Ordinance
No. 507, shall be $90.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained within
such construction and the minimum connection charge for such new construction
shall be $90.00.
Section 3. Effective January 1, 1976, the connection charge for
replacement buildings and the credit against such charge, as defined in
Ordinance No. 507, shall be established in Ordinance No. 507, as modified
by Section 1 and Section 2 hereof.
Section 4. Effective January 1, 1976, the connection charge for
additions to or alterations of existing buildings where further new con-
struction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of family ~welling
buildings or the area of building to be used for other than family dwelling
AGENDA ITEM #9Co) -DISTRICT,5 "J-1"
"J-2"
buildings shall be $175 for each dwelling unit addc<l or crcatc<l and i11
the case of new construction other than family dwelling buildings, it shnll
be $90.00 per 1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained in such
new construction and the minimum connection charge for such new construction
shall be $90.00.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1975.
AGENDA ITEM #9(o) -DISJ~ICT .5 "J-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
ONT RAC TOR: Rogers & Davies DATE November 6, 1975
-----~~--~~-:...~~~~-------
OB: Tustin-Orange Tnink Sewer, Reaches 11 and Portion of 12, Contract No. 7-6-7
Amount of th ts Change Order (X»») (~~) $ 0.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
ontract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
~ductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
AnJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES
DEDUCT:
Item Cllange Est'd Quantities
No. Unit From To
2 L.F. 5,498 5,492
ll EAUI 2 1
12 EAOi 2 1
13 C.Y. 10 0
Difference
6 @ $32/L.F.
1 @ $250 EAQ-1
1 @ $350 EAQ-1
10 @ $40/C.Y.
TOTAL DEDUCT:
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Change (~"tl.~) (DEDUCT)
Amended Contract Price
192.00
250. 00
350.00
400.00
$1,192.00
$ 349, 818.00
$ o. 00
$ 1,192.00
$ 348, 626. 00
oard authorization date: November 12, 1975 Approved:
y------------------~--~--------~--C on s u 1 ting Engineer
y ________________________________ ~--
Contractor
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
0 range County, Ca 1 i forn i a
By -----------------------------------Chief Engineer
"K" AGENDA ITEM #9(Q) -DISTRICT '7 "K"
"L"
RESOLUTION NO. 75-153-7
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-6-7 AS CO~WLETE
A RESOLlITION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUN1Y, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT
NO. 7-6-7 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL
CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of Cotmty Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange
Cotmty, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. 1bat the contractor, Rogers & Davies, has completed the
constn.iction in accordance with the terms of the contract for TUSTIN-ORANGE
TRUNK SEWER, REACH 11 AND A PORTION OF REACH 12, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-7, on the
31st of October, 1975; and,
Section 2. That by letter, Boyle Engineering Corporation, District's
engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in
accordance with the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said
engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and
ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 11 and a Portion of
Reach 12, Contract No. 7-6-7, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with
the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 29th of May, 1975; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Rogers & Davies setting
forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of said Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer,
Reach 11 and a Portion of Reach 12, Contract No. 7-6-7, is hereby approved; and,
Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are
hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1975.
AGENDA ITEM #9(R) -DISTRICT,7 "L"
"M"
RESOLUTION NO. 75-155-7
ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASE~IENT FROM TIJSTIN
CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. AND AU1lIORIZING
EXEClITION OF QUITCLAIM DEED
.A RESOLtITION OF TIIE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM TUSTIN CONSTRUCTION
CO., INC. RE TRACT NO. 5448, AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF QUITCLAIM DEED TO TUSTIN CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. FOR
PORTION OF SAID EASEMENT IN CONSIDERATION THEREFOR
* * * * * * '* * * * * * *
1he Board of Directors of Col.mty Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant cf Easement dated October 17, 1974,
wherein an easement within Tract No. 5448 in the vicinity southerly of Newport
Avenue and Cowan Heights Drive and westerly of Skyline Drive for sanitary sewer
purposes is granted to Cotmty Sanitation District No. 7, is hereby accepted from
Tustin Construction Co., Inc.; and,
Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is
more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto
and made a part of this resolution; and:
Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is in consideration for that
certain quitclaim described in Section 5 herein; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of Cotmty
Sanitation District No. 7 be authorized and directed to record said Grant of
Easement in the Official Records of Orange Cotmty, California; and,
Section 5. That the certain Quitclaim Deed dated November 12, 1975, for
an abandoned existing sewer easement on Lot 9 of Tract 5448, from Cotmty Sanitation
District No. 7 to Tustin Construction Co., Inc. be approved; and,
Section 6. That the real property to be quitclaimed is more particularly
described and shown on Exhibits "C" and "D", attached hereto and made a part of
this resolution;ands
Section 7. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District be
authorized and directed to execute said Quitclaim Deed, quitclaiming the District's
interest in the certain real property hereinabove described.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1975.
AGENDA ITEM #9(r) -DISTRICT 7 II M"
..
..
"N-1"
Cou~~ l Y SMnTATION D!s1 r:1u ~.
of Ul\Ar~Gl Lou NlY, CAur ()U~"
P.O. lJOX 8127
IOR4"4 [LllS AVENUE
fOUNl AIN VALL[ Y, CAL If Qi{NIA 91 !Ur
(71-4) 5-40-7910
(71..C) 962-2411
MEMORANDUM
November 6, 1975
TO: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
SUBJECT: Contract No. ll-4R Bid Reconunendation
Having reviewed the bids for Contract No. ll-4R, I recommend award
to the low bidder, Clifford L. Thompson Construction Company.
Although an irr~~1lari~y in Schedule B was noted~ the Schedule A
bid price is in accordance with our cost estimates. I have verified
this Schedule A price with Clifford Thompson and he concurs with a
total price of $19,821.00
Southern California Gas Company has agreed to pay their share of
the work, which totals $3,000.00. This amount will bring the cost
to the District down to $16,821.00.
ND:hje
c olas DiBenedetto
Associate Engineer
the above recommendation
AGENDA ITEM #9Cu) -DISTRICT 11 ''N-1"
:::: :z
I
N ::::
CONTRACT FOR:
CO~TRACTOR
BID TABULATION
SHEET
REIDDEL NEWLAND-HAMILTON PUMPING STATION FACILITIES
CO}..'TRACT NO. ll-4R
-
SCHEDULE A
:i> ~-========-===-==:a=-:=====-============-================;:
Cj) 1.
ITEM I 1tp1 2 ITEM 3
rn *Clifford L. Thompson Construction Co. :z
~ Santa Ana, CA
..._... 2 • Technical Utilities
-I rn Downey, CA 3
:::: :z , ..
I
N :::
3.
5.
6.
7.
9.
o.
Masonry Engineers Inc.
Long Beach, CA
*Irregularity in bid proposal.
(
$12, 541. 00 $3, =~56. 00 $3,924.00
·-$17,528.00 $3,840.00 $2,766.00
$24,160.00 $Spl20.00 $2,500.00
DATE October 30, 1975 -11:00 A.M.
SCHEDULE A SCHEDULE 8
$19,821.00 Incomplete
$24,134.00 $18,634.00
$31,780.00 $27,780.00
(
.· COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
P.O A0X ll177
10844 ELLI~ AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92703
November 4, 1975
M E M 0 R A N D U M
TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager
FROM: w. N. Clarke, Superintendent
SUBJECT: Bird Machine Company Centrifuge Parts
(714) 54 ~-2910
(714) 962-24 1 1
Operating and test data from work done in the ·sludge dewatering
area during the past serveral months indicate the n~ed for some
changes in both equipment and operating modes.
0
As described in the report done by w. H. Fox, the Districts'
Operations Engineer, on thickened feed and alternate polymer feed
points, the equipment needs are twofold.
One requirement is to add externally adjustable bowl-head
skimmers to three centrifuges, the use of which could have a potential
of saving $34 to $82 per day in polymer costs, plus the benefit of a
slightly drier sludge cake.
The other requirement is to procure two complete rotating
elements (which will fit the existing four centrifuges) to facilitate
repairs while continuing the program of sludge dewatering on a
continuous basis.
As directed by the Board on September 10, 1975, I entered into
negotiations with the Bird Machine Company of South Walpole, Mass.,
for the purchase of three sets of centrifuge bowl-head sldI!k"11ers and
two sets of rotating elements, our Specification No. E-077·
In an endeavor to establish a fair market price, I secured the
price for two complete machines which were bid in April, 197L~ in
conjunction with our Contract No. Pl-16. The total price for the
two machines and appurtenances, at that time, was $295,000. The
competitively priced machines, which were successfully bid on Pl-16
by the Sharpless Company, cost $253,000 which included two complete
centrifuges and two 200 horsepower electric motors.
We had considered installing a complete new centrifuge at
Plant No. 2 and our estimate and approved budget figure for that
project was $250,000.
"0-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "0-1"
.tt·rea A. Harper -2-November 4, 1975
I met with Messrs. Tom Burns, the Western Sales Manager, and
Glen Reierstad, Sales Engineer of the Walnut Creek office of the
Bird Machine Company, and established unit prices and terms ana
conditions for the equipment in question. The two rotating elements
are of the greatest magnitude and the longest delivery (12 months).
As a result of our negotiations, the following options are
presented for consideration:
OPTION #1
Cl
A. Base price
Payable 30 days after delivery
(12 months)
OPTION #2
A.
B.
c.
OPTION #3
Base price
For advance
5 months -
• Total price
A. Base price
payment of $50,000
DEDUCT
for Option /f2
at
B. For advance payment of $50~000 at
5 IUC;1°ths z~ DED!_ICT
$190,595
$190,595
8,ooo
$182,595
$190,595
$182,595
c. 30% ($51,698) of total called "Material
Contentrr to be subject to price adjust-
ment at time of shipment (historically
1/2% per month -$3100) -DEDUCT $ 10,335
D. Total price for Option #3 $172,260
A Faithful Performance Bond will be supplied by Bird Machine
Company for the entire amount.
A one-year warranty is included on all equipment
Payment will be maqe 30 days after delivery of either rotating
element in a condition satisfactory to the Districts.
Based on the information secured, it is my recommendation that
·we enter into a purchase contract with the Bird Machine Company for
two sets of rotating elements as spelled out in the attached quotation,
in the amount of $172,260 plus freight, taxes, and price escalation
(Option #3) .
"0-2"
V7i~ w. N. Clarke
Superintendent
AGENDA ITEM #12(A) -ALL DISTRICJS "0-2"
November 4, 1975
As a part of the negotiations it was determined that the below
listed items, which are common to all of the centrifuges and could be
delivered in a shorter time frame, would be best purchased as a
separate order.
Item B -Three liC(Pnversion kits" for adding bowl-
head skimmers to the existing Bird 36x96
centrifuges, similar to your Order No.
26539, Items A through M. Delivery is
18-22 weeks.
Price: $4,839 x 3-----------------------$14,517.00
Item C -One Bird SA-70 gear unit, to fit all
four existing machines plus the two
rotating assemblies, ratio 116:1.
Delivery is 20-26 weeks.
Price: ---------------------------------$11,949.00
Item D -One pair of pillow blocks, inter-
changeable with all four Bird 36x96
centrifuges. Delivery is 8-10 months.
~· ,, t::"'., ,... ....... Price: --~------------------------------£ ~,uc~.vv
TOTAL $31,087.00
The above prices are subject to California sales tax and are
f.o.b. South Walpole, Mass. A one-year warranty is included on all
equipment.
Payment will be made 30 days after delivery in a condition
satisfactory to the Districts for items as listed above.
Based on the information secured, it is my recommendation that
we enter into a purchase contract with the Bird Machine Company for
the above-listed items as set out in the attached quotation, in the
amount of $31,087, plus California sales tax and freight.
WNC:gg
"0-3"
'l.l'Y/t/~ w. N. Clarke
Superintendent
AGENDA ITEM #12(A) -ALL DISTRlCTS "0-3"
II P"
RESOLtITION NO. 75-157
APPROVING PURD-IASE CONTRACT WITH BIRD MACHINE CO.
A JOINT RESOLlJfION OF TI-IE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6,
7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
AND AUlliORIZING EXECUTION OF PURCHASE CONTRACT
wrrn BIRD MACHINE COMPANY FOR CENTRIFUGE PARTS
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
1he Boards of Directors of Cotmty Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange Cotmty, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. 1bat the certain Purchase Contract dated
by and between Cotmty Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange
County and Bird Machine Company for purchase of centrifuge parts pursuant to
Specification No. E-077, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That payment for said parts is hereby authorized in the amotmt
appurtenances, and $172,260.00 plus tax and freight for two sets of rotating
elements pursuant to the terms and conditions of said contract; and,
Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to execute said
agreement on behalf of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved
by the General CotmSel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1975.
AGENDA ITEM #12(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "P"
"Q-1"
RESOLUTION NO. 75-145
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTAB-
LISHING PROCEDURES FOR THE COLLECTION OF
DELINQUENT OBLIGATIONS OWING TO THE DISTRICTS.
MIBREAS, in the course of conducting the business affairs of the
Districts, certain accounts receivable become delinquent and, in fact,
uncollectable; and
WHEREAS, the costs incurred by the Districts in attempting collection
of delinquent accounts receivable can exceed the amounts recovered; and
WHEREAS, costs and efficiency can be greatly improved by the adoption
of certain policies relating to the collection of accounts.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER:
Section 1. The Finance Director is authorized to write off as an
uncollectable debt any delinquent obligation owing to the Districts in
excess of ninety (90) days and not exceeding the sum of Twenty-five Dollars
($25. 00).
Section 2. The Finance Director is authorized to assign for collection
to a person or firm of his choosing, any delinquent obligation owing to the
Districts in excess of ninety (90) days and not exceeding the sum of Five
Hundred Dollars ($500. 00).
Section 3. The Finance Director is authorized to file the neces~ary
proceedings in the Small Claims Court of the respective judicial district
of the County of Orange in order to collect any delinquent obligation owing
to the Districts in excess of ninety (90) days and not exceeding the sum of
Five l~ndrcd Dollars ($500.00).
AGENDA ITEM #13(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "Q-1"
"Q-2"
Section 4. In addition to the above, the Finance Director shall
forward any delinquent obligation in excess of Five Ilun<lrcd Dollars ($SOO.OO)
to the General Counsel for the Districts who shall submit his recommendation
to the Boards of Directors as to the method of collection of said account.
Section S. In addition to the above authorizations, the finance
Director is directed to exercise all available lawful methods to insure
prompt and full recovery of all obligations owing to the Distric~s.
Section 6. The Finance Director is authorized to offset against any
sums held on deposit by the Districts on behalf of any person who owes a
delinquent obligation to the Districts.
Section 7. The Finance Director is authorized to withhold the approval
of any permits otherwise to be issued by the Districts to any person who has
an outstanding debt obligation owing to the Districts until such time as
said debt obligation is paid in full.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1975.
AGENDA ITEM #13(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "Q-2"
II R"
RESOLtrrION ~O. 75-146
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATIOl\ DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPOINTING REPRESENTATIVES FOR TI-IE DISTRICTS
TO ACT AS AGENTS ON THEIR BEHALF IN THE SMALL
CLAIMS COURT OF TIIE WEST ORANGE COUNTY JUDICIAL
DISTRICT
* * * * * * * * * * *
~11EREAS, the Boards of Directors deem it necessary to periodically
commence legal action in the Small Claims Court to collect debts owing to the
Districts; and,
WHEREAS, these legal proceedings must be filed on a continuing basis; and,
WHEREAS, the rules of the court provide that attorneys shall not be allowed
to appear and represent parties to these proceedings; and,
WHEREAS, it is necessary to appoint agents for the Districts to act
for and on their behalf in the Small Claims Court of the West Orange Cotmty
Judicial District,
NOW, iHEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange Cotmty, California,
DO HEREBY DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That those persons set forth on Exhibit "A" to this resolution
are appointed to represent and· appear for the Districts on any and all claims
filed in the Small Claims Cou~t of the West Orange Cotmty Judicial District; and,
Section 2. That the Board of Directors are authorized to change the
personnel set forth on Exhibit "A" to this resolution by minute order.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1975.
AGENDA ITEM #13CB) -ALL DISTRICTS "R"
F
"S"
November 5, 1975
TO:
FROM:
M E M 0 R A N D U M ----------
Fred A. Harper, General Manager
w. N. Clarke, Superintendent
vUUNIT 01\f'lll/\JIUr~ u::_,rr.n
of 0HANG[ COUNTY. LJ\Lll u1u.o,
P. 0 BOX er;·
10844 llll~ AVI 1i1 ''
fOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALllOMNIA 9//u
1714) )40·2111<
(714) 962-241 I
SUBJECT: Sale of Sludge -Specification No. S-016
On Thursday, October 30, the Districts ~pened bids for the
sale of digested sewage sludge. The call for bids was advertised
in accordance with the provisions contained in the current Purchasinc
Resolution.
The specifications contained three different bid items and
bidders were invited to bid on any or.all of the items as they saw
tit.
Bid Item No. 1 provides for the continuation of a land-dryin[
operation using D1s~ricts 1 equipment and personnel (at the presen~
time Districts• costs for this operation are approximately $5.85 per
cubic yard of sludge in a condition suitable for shipment).
Bid Item No. 2 provides for contractor's trucking of sludge to
landfill or ofisi~e drying operation using contractor's equipmen~
and personnel (this would be utilized only when conditions precluded
the orderly operatic~ cf l~d-d~yi~g on Dist~icts' property).
Bid Item No. 3 provides for land-drying operation on District~'
property using con~ractor's equipment and personnel.
The only bids received were from the firms of Kellogg Supply.·
Inc. and Golden West Fertilizer Co. They are as indicated belo~.
BID TABULATION
Contractor
Kellogg Supply Inc.
Golden West Fertilizer Co.
Bid
Item
1
2
3
1
2
3
Payment to
Districts
+50¢ c.y.
+10¢ c.y.
+$1. 53 c .y.
Cos "t tc·
Distric-cs
-$2. 56 c .y.
-$3· 50 c -:: .
-$2.505 c.y.
Based upon the bids received and considering the cost of our
present operation, it is recommended that the award of a contract
for a period of one year (with provisions to extend for two addi-
tional one-year periods) be made to the Kellogg Supply, Inc. for
Bid Items No. 2 and 3.
WNC:gg
Attachment
ll/n~ w. N. Clarke
Superintendent
AGENDA ITEM #14(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "S"
"T"
RESOLUTION NO. 75-147
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH KELLOGG SUPPLY, INC.
A JOINT RESOLlITION OF TIIE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AND AUTIIORIZING EXECtrrION OF AGREEMENT
WITH KELLOGG SUPPLY, INC. FOR SALE OF DIGESTED
SEWAGE SLUDGE
* * * * * * * * * * *
1be Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, CalifoTilia
00 HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. 'Ib.at the certain agreement dated by and
~~~~~~~~~
between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange Cotmty
and Kellogg Supply, Inc. for Sale of Digested Sewage Sludge, Specification
No. S-016, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the General Manager is hereby authorized to execute said
agreement on behalf of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved
by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1975.
AGENDA ITEM 14(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "T,,
STATE Of CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN jR., Govern.or
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
lCOt1'.0Cmtl~!'O~~~
~Wft~~~tp(X~i
"U-1"
P. O. Box 100
Sacramento, CA 95801
{916) 445-7765
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ON THE POSSIBLE DESIGNATION OF THE SOUTH COAST
AREA AS A 208 PLANNING AREA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the State Water Resources Control
Board, pursuant to the authority vested by Section 208 of the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act .Amendments of 1972 and pur-
suant to regulations contained in Subchapter 18, Chapter 3,
Title 23, California Administrative Code, proposes to receive
evidence on the appropriate area(s) and planning agency(s) which
may be considered for designation for areawide waste treatment
management planning in the South Coast Area.
~
NOTICE IS ALSO GIVEN that evidence will be received at a
public hearing to be held at 10 a.m. on November 17~ 1975 in
Room L-6, Los Angeles County Health Service Auditorium, 3f3 North
Figueroa, Los Angeles, California ..
NOTICE IS ALSO GIVEN that the Executive Officer of the State
Water Resources Control Board, acting pursuant to authority
delegated by the Board, did on March 12, 1975, identify the South
Coast Area as follows:
ALL OF ORANGE COUNTY AND THOSE PORTION) OF VENTURA,
LOS ANGELES, RIVERSIDE, AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES
LYING WITHIN THE SANTA CLARA, LOS ANGELES, AND SANTA
ANA RIVER BASIN PLANNING AREAS, AND THAT PORTION OF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY LYING NORTHWEST OF THE SANTA
MARGARITA RIVER SUBBASIN AND SOUTH OF THE SANTA
ANA RIVER BASIN PLANNING AREA.
· After a public hearing held in April 1975, the Board sustained its
earlier designation of the Ventura County portion of the South
Coast Area and continued the Board's earlier nondesignation of
the remaining portion of the South Coast Area. The Board took
this action primarily as a result of a general lack of local
support for designation of the entire South Coast Area. By
notice dated August 4, 1975, the Executive Officer of the State
Board expressed the Board's intent to pursue the establishment
of one or more 208 planning areas in the nondesignated portion
AGENDA ITEM #15 -ALL DISTRICTS "U-1"
..
'
"IJ-2"
-2-
of the South Coast Area. Subsequent to the August 4 notice,
inquiries and proposals for designation have been submitted as
follows:
Designation of the Malibu-Santa Monica mountains area
with the County of Los Angeles, Department of Regional
Planning, as the designated planning agency;
Designation of a joint powers agency which would be
created by execution of an agreement between Orange
County Sanitation District, City of Los Angeles, and
Sanitation Districts of Los Angele.s County. The ·
designated area would be that area within the juris-
diction of the three parties to the joint powers
agreement;
Designation of the area lying within the Santa Ana
Water Project Authority with designation of the
Authority as the 208 planning agency, and;
Designation of the entire South Coast Area with designa-
tion of the Southern California Association of Governments
{SCAG) as a 208 p~anning agency.
The Southern California Association of Governments has requested
that a public hearing be held on the subject at hand.
It is the State Board's position that recommendations for designation
should be accompanied by the following information:
•
Description of the area proposed for designation.
Description of the water quality problems existing
in the area.
Description of the institutions that would be most
affected by the designation.
Description of the appropriate composition of the
governing body of the agency recommended for
designation.
Description of· the planning program that would be
accomplished, including anticipated outputs.
Description of the powers and authorities of the
agency recommended for designation.
Recommendations of individual local governments,
both general and special purpose, within the area
proposed for designation regarding the proposed
designation.
AGENDA ITEM #15 -ALL DISTRICTS "IJ-2"
•
. '
"U-3 11
-3-
Because of the broad environmental assessment which will be
required for the plan, it is the State Board staff's position
. that any agency or aeencies recommended for designation Bhould
be capable of addres~ing and analyzing a broad spectrum of
water-related envlronmental issues, including but not limited
to nonpoint sources of water pollution, air pollution and land
use.
NOTICE IS ALSO GIVEN that interested persons may present
statements and arguments o~ally or in writing at the November 17,
1975, hearing. Of particular interest to the State Board will be
the conditions which now exist and which are different from
conditions which existed at the time of the State Board's hear-
ing in April 1975; the appropriateness of each of the alternatives
for designation which have been described herein; and any recom-
mendations regarding the appropriate area(s) and agency(s) that
should be considered for designation. ·
NOTICE IS ALSO GIVEN that because of administrative time
schedules and requirements, written statements must be presented
on or prior to the November 17, 1975, hearing. Such written
statements should be submitted to the State Water Resources
Control Board, P.· 0. Box 100, Sacramento, CA 95801. The State
Board will determine, at a scheduled meeting, if any part of
the South Coast Area should be designated as an areawide waste
treatment management planning area. Any designation by the
State Board will be for the purpose of designating the appro-
priate boundaries of the area and an appropriata planning orgc~J1i;::
zation which fulfills those requirements contained in Section ~Uv
of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 and
Subchapter 18, Chapter 3, Title 23, California Administrative Code.
Any area designated may be of greater or lesser extent than that
area identified by the Executive Officer, depending upon evidence
received at this public hearing.
The State will designate appropriate management agencies to
implement the developed plan pursuant to Section 208 of the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 and
will use its enforcement authorities, as necessary and appro-
priate, to assure implementation •
This notice is intended to satisfy applicable requirements of
federal regulations contained in Part 105, Subchapter D,
Chapter 1, CFR, Title 40 •
Dated: OCT 1 6 1975 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
L? :LI 11. Ll~L
Bill B. Dendy --,
Executive Officer
AGENDA ITEM #15 -ALL DISTRICTS 11 U-3"
"V-1"
B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N
S H E E T
Date October 21, 1975 -11: 00 A. M.
Contract For: . SANTA ~A RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER
(GYPSUM°CANYON ROAD TO ORANGE COUNTY LINE)
REAQIES 6 , 7 & 8
CONTRACT NO. 2-14-5 Engineer's Estimate: $2,483,167.00
CONTRACTOR
1. S. S. Zarubica
Sun Valley, California
2. Sully-Miller Contracting Company
Long Beach, California
3. Steve Bubalo Construction Co.
Reseda, California
4. Steve P. Rados, Inc.
Santa Ana, California
5. Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc.
South El Monte, California
6. Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc.
San Bernardino, California
7. Tab Construct ion, Inc.
Las Vegas, Nevada
8~ Pascal & Ludwig, Inc.
Upland, California
9. L. S. Hawley Corp. and Bebek Co., J.V.
Irvine, California
10. Paul Hubbs Construction Co.
Rialto, California
11. George Miller Construction Company
Los Angeles, California
AGENDA ITEM f28 -DISTRICT 2
TOTAL BID
$2,096,676.15
c
$2,442,389.00
$2,485,635.00
$2,487,316.00
$2,501,978.00
$2,533,891.00
$2,619,463.00
$2,672,157.00
$2,695,585.00
$2,719,517.00
$2,732,387.70
11 V-l"
''V-2"
BID TABULATION SHEET . Date October 21, 1975
Contract For: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACHES 6, 7 & 8, CONTRACT NOo 2-14-5
Continued ....... .
12. R. L. Thibodo Construction Co., Inc.
San Marcos, California
13. K. E. C. Company & Keith E. Card, A Jt. Venture
Hawaiian Gardens, California
14 • Mark Dakovich, Inc.
Brea, California
15. R. E. and R. W. Crane, Inc.
Long Beach, California .
16.
17 .
. 18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
AGENDA ITEM #28 -DISTRICT 2
$2,848,832.00
$2,861,526.00
$3,326,869.00
$3,517,989.00
"V-2"
,_,
"W"
CITY OF COSTA MESA
CALIFORNIA 92626 P. 0. BOX 1 200
FROM THE OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICES
October 27, 1975
Mr. Fred Harper
General Manager
Orange County Sanitation Districts
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Dear Mr. Harper:
The City of Costa Mesa is in the process of developing
several park sites in County Sanitation District No. 7.
Since these sites reflect considerable acreage, but very
little in the way of usage of sewer facilities, we would
like to request that the District No. 7 Acreage Fees
($562.50/acre) be waived on park developments.
The following is a brief description of the proposed
park sites and the acreage involved:
1. Wakeham Park -10 acre community park with two
restrooms and one drinking fountain.
2. Gisler Park -2.8 acre neighborhood park with
one drinking fountain.
3. Bear Street Park -4 acre neighborhood park, as
yet unplanned. ·
4. Paulo Park -2.5 acre neighborhood park, as yet
unplanned.
In addition, there is a possibility of future acquisition
and development of three other sites within the district.
The necessary connection fees and annexation fees will be
collected on these developments.
We appreciate your consideration of this request.
JHE:km
truly yours,
Eldridge
ctor of Public Services/
Engineer
AGENDA ITEM f.l3l -DI STR.I CT 7 "W"
·r
"X"
RESOLUTION NO. 75-159-5
APPROVING MEMBERSHIP IN NIWA FOR BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE COUN1~
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICf NO. S OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
INCLUSION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE COUNTY AS
AN ADDITIONAL MEMBER AGENCY OF THE NEWPORT-IRVINE WASTE
MANAGEMEITT PLANNING AGENCY IN ACCORDANCE WITII CONDITIONS
OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS' RESOLUTION NO. 75-1431
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement dated
March 28, 1975, the Newport-Irvine Waste Management Planning Agency (NIWA) has
heretofore been created; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Orange Cormty has requested inclusion
as a party to said agreement and member of the Newport-Irvine Waste Management
Planning Agency; and,
WHEREAS, Section 36 of said agreement provides for admission of new members.
No. 5 of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That inclusion of the Board of Supervisors of Orange Cormty
as an additional member agency of the Newport-Irvine Waste Management Planning
Agency (NIWA) is hereby approved in accordance with the conditions set forth in
the Board of Supervisors' Resolution No. 75-1431, pursuant to Section 36 of the
Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement creating said agency; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized to execute an addendum to said agreement authorizing inclusion of
the Board of Supervisors of Orange Cotmty, as provided in Section 1 hereof.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1975.
AGENDA ITEM #34 -DISTRICT·S "X"
.. ..
-;, . .
SUPCRV150il. ,-IFTti DISTRICT
. TII0~11\S F. RILEY
ORANGE: COUNTY ElOARD or !:iUPERVl~ORS
ORANGE COUNTY ADr.flNl~TnATION 8UILOING
515 NORTH SYCAMORE. P.O. EJOX GD7. SANTA ANA.CAL1f"OiH-.1A 92702
PHONE: 834-3550 (AREA CODC:. 714)
September 29, 1975
.· ..
The Honorable Board of Supervisors
County of Orange
515 North Sy~amore Street
Santa Ana, California 92701
Gent l ernen :
Subject: Newport Bay Water Quality Planni.ng
-
t,10 /'lf._irJtA..,!. Ct••ift..'r Ot-.'I! <:J..
Narrative: The Board of Supervisors continued the proposed Ne\·1port Bay
. Water Qua 1 i ty Planning Program for 30 days to a 110\·1 for
Supervisor Riley to ~eet with apptopriate agencies to
determine their input and recow.mendationsT As a result
Of" ""h;c mno+1·nn so"ov-;il rh=-ir.nns ~.,,.o p....-opnr::-ori t .., ·~ •• ,_\.... ...... ' ::;,, ._..,~. '-4 -·'"'""" •:;.>'-c .• \.,. • .......-'"--~
On September 2, 1975 ,-the Ne\·1port Bay Water Quality Pl anni.ng Program
··was continued, This v1as to a11m·1 an opportunity for me to invite
representatives of various involved agencies to discuss the proposed
~gency and·to develop their·recommendations.pertaining to the proposed
work pr.ogram~
Such a meeting was held on September 8, 1975~ Representatives of the
Department of Fi sh and Galile, the Irvine Ranch Hater Di std ct, the Ne\·J-
port/ Irvine t~aste Management Planni.ng Agency, the city of r!e\·1port Beach~
Supervisor Clark's office, the Director of the Environmental Man~gement
f\gency, a member of my staff, and I \·:ere present~
The discussion generally centered on the best way to achieve effective
results in improving and enhancing the \·Jater quality and wildlife
potential of Nc\·1port Bay for the least amount of cost and duplication
of effort.
It was agreed by those present that the program should be rcstructered
to incl~de the following points;
L The county should assume the:~lead responsibility for the joint
powers agency, Tm·wrd this end it appears clcsirilble for tlH EM/\
to provide staff for this purpose and for the County Counsel to pro-
..._.. vide legal counsel for the agency.
"Y-1" AGENDA ITEM #34 -DISTRIC~ 5 "Y-1~'
,.
"Y-2"
The Honorable Bourd of Supervisors
Page T\·10
September 29, 1975
2. Members of the agency should include: the county, the cities of
Nc\'/port Beach, lrvine, 2nd any other \'Jatershed city \'lishin~J to join,
the Irvine Ranch Hater District, County Sanit'1tion District r:0. 5,
the Orange County \·later District, and the Deportm2nt of rish and
. Game.
At the time of the meeting, it was unclear whether or not Fish and
Game could legally be a rr.2mber of the agency, Since then the
Governor has signed SB-1257, which a116ws the Director df Fish and
Game.to serve on the _agency.
The possibility of the Santa Ana Reg i ona 1 Water Qua} i ty Boa rd becom-
ing a member was discussed. It was concluded that while their
membership was desirable, it is unknown whether or not it is legally
possible. ·If legal representation on the agency is not possible,
it is expected that the regional board.would still play an. important
role in the conduct of the studies.
3. Staff capabilities and expertise of all agencies should be made
ava i1ab1 e to the agency on an 11 as-needed 11 basis. It is hoped that
such sharing of s·taff \·lill help reduce the need for outside
consultants.
4, The work program should riilVC a sho:·te:' Lime frame .ti:2n
proposal of five years,
. 5. The agency should also provide a forum for cooperative planning of
rehabilitation programs for the Upper Bay, including possible ~ilot
dredgin~ programs. ·
These clw_nges have been discussed with the Director of the EMA) v:ho
concurs with the modifications.
Recommended Action: Refer proposed ~odifications of the Newport Bay Water
Quality Study to the Director of the EMA., County Counsel, and th2 mem-
bers of NIHA to incorporate the recozr~'ilendecl changes and report back to
the Board of Supervisors,
. R~~Ctfully, ~
vfftlf:,ef~y /1Ui·
Thomas F. Ri l cy • L-J
·Supervisor, Fifth District
TFR: seh
AGH.JDA ITEM f131J -DI$TRICT 5 "Y-2"
.-.
···r
i
.. ;
.J >
::It-
.... 2
0 z ::> ::> 0 ~~v
-w , ~ > ::> ' ... ~ z
0 -< =>a: ~(I
2
3
4
5
6
I
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17 ii II
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
.28
29
30
31
""-"' ~2
"Z-1"
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ORANGE COGNTY, CALIFO~'n.-=-~
October 7, 1975
On motion of Supervisor Riley, duly seconded and carried, the
following Resolution was ado~ted:
WHEREAS, the proposed Upper Ne\·;port Bay Wa tcr Quality Planning
Study was continued by this Board from Septc~b~r 2, 1975 to October 7,
1975 to enable Supervisor Riley to meet with ~he a~propriate and affecteJ
agencies to deternine their input and ~eco~.mendations,
WHEREAS, such a meeting was held on September 8, 1975 resulting in
the following proposed modifications of the Upper ~1ewport Bay Water
Quality Planning Study:
1. The County should assume the lead responsibility for the joint
powers agency. Toward this end it appears desirable for t!"le Ef.lA to pro-
vide staff for this purpose and for the County Counsel to provide legal
counsel for the agency.
of Newport Beach, Irvine, and any other watershed city wishing to joir.,
the J.rvine Ranch i·1ater District, County Sanitation District ~~o. 5, the
Orange County Water District, end the Departnent of Fish and Game.
While the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board membership is
desirable, it is unkr.own whether or not it is legally possible. If legal
representatio~ on the agency is not possible, it is cx~ected that the
regional board would still play an important role in the conduct of the
studies. I
3. Staff capabilit~es and expertise of all agencies should be r;,ade;
available to the agency en an "as-needed" basis. It is hoped that such
sharing of staff will help reduce the need for outside consultants.
4. The work program should have a shorter time frame than the
origin~! proposal of five years.
Ill
Ill
Rc~olution No. 75-1431
Proposed Modifications to AGENDA ITEM #34 -DISTRICT 5 ·
l~oHport Bay i·? .. 1tcr Quality
Pl\urnin9
I
I
I
I
I
I
"Z-1"
.J >
Ioli-...... z
0 z ::> :> 0
Ill 0 u
t,) u
i: > ~ ...... z o;,
! ~ ~
S. The agency should also provide a forum ior cooperative planning
2 of rehabilitation programs for the Upper Bay, including possible pilot
3 dredging programs.
4 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED th. h d :1 • f . . I at t e above propose mori 1cat1ons;
I 5 of the Upper New-port Bay Water Quality Planning Study are referred to the
6 Director of the Environmental Management Agency, County Counsel and the
7 rnembers!"lip of the Newport-Irvine Waste Manager.1ent Planning Agency· (NIWA.) to
8 incorporate the modifications into the program and report back to this
9 Board with the understanding that neither the joint powers agency nor the
10 County of Orange will make contributions to dredging the Back Bay.
11
12
13
·14
15
161
17
I --.. l~
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
. ,:>
AYES: SUPERVISORS THO~L-::\.S F. RILEY, R.~LPH B. CLARK, ROBERT ~·~. BATTI:J,
LAURENCE J. SCH?HT AND R.c'\LPH A. DIEDRICH
UOES:. SUPERVISORS NONE
ABSENT: SUPERVISORS ~JO~'!E
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, WILLIAM E. ST JOHN, County Clerk nnd ex-officio
Board of Sup2rvisor8 of Oran~e County, California, her~by
the nbovc and foregoing R23olution -;;~s duly and r~gulnrly
said Board at a regular ra2eting thereof held on the /~h
0c~ob2r , 19 7 S , and passed by a u:~~r:i:-.~m::.
said Hoard
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I
day of Octote~ ----7th
Clerk of the
c~rtify thnt
.:idopted by thQ
day of
vote of
t OIU-12
@
"Z-2" AGEtmA ITEM f~34 -DISTRICT 5 "Z-2"
. ft'
CONSTRUCTION
-PROGRESS REPORTS
OCT OBER 3 1, 1 9 7 5
11
.•
. "
ENGINEERI NG DEPART:MENT
SL.u°"'E 'SL..1D £
GAT E;~ -~E::D
BLOWER __ ,.... I
BIJILDJ/.JG "'.":'" . ~
I
JO q 8 r . . . '
J pJSTAL.Le:.D ~Al~/IJr;;
1/IJ ST A U..A TI O N C.0/IJT I~ l.U:".S
...
D/GE~TEl<f
5 4 3 2 I . .
AERATJ.ON BASIN~
I "£r-j...PWe .fZ. l-E V E..L
~ AAJ /.!A t
~
z I
4 3
6 5
8 ,,
10 'J
12 JI
14 13
' ...
fEtONDAR Y \CL ARIF/ERS
\_ D ec~ ~vt:L..
cofl)c.e.~;e. IN PtACi!
C£/\.J 'f'8.~ 51!:C.TJ ~ f'1PJrJGr
LA 11.JO F'...S?.WJ\Y
50 MG D ACTIVATED SLUDGE
CONTRACT NO. P1 -16
•,
C 0 l\J TRACT N 0. P 1 -1 6
SO MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT
Donovan Construction Company of Minnesota, Contractor
STARTING DATE: June 27' 1974 CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 14' 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 30 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMP LET ION DATE: Jan. 13' 19 77
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $29, 876, 000. 00
•
PA I 0 TO DATE: $ 21, 3 31, 3 0 7. 4 8
•
Contract is for the construction of Activated tirith Plant No. 2 effluent at the outfaZl booster
station, improving the overall quality of water
pumped through the outfall system into the ocean.
Sludge secondary treatment faci Zities at Plant No.
l. The new faci'lities UJiU aid the Districts in
meeting rra.ndated State and Federa Z ocean discharge
requirements.
When completed, the secondary treatment system
lAJill process the 50 mgd of wastewater flowing
through PZant No. 1. The effluent wiZZ then blend
Significant structures included in the contract
are the Blower Building, Aeration Basins, Second-
ary Clarifiers, wo Digestern, Waste Sludge Thick-
eners and the POl.Jer Building.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Much of the activity this month centers around equipment
deliveries and mechanical and electrical installationso
Walls on the Blower Building are complete with only three
sections remaining to be placedo Both 1~00 horsepower hlower
engines have been delivered and are stored next to the
existing trickling filters. One of the turbine-generator
units for emergency power generation is ready for installationo
The outside concrete guard rail wall is being installed on the
Aeration Basins. Air and sludge piping is being placed along
with slide gates for the sludge channels between the basins.
The influent area is structurally completeo
Piping is being installed in the center gallery of the Secondary
Clarifierso Concrete crossbeams are in place and mechanical
work in the return sludge pump station is underway.
The contractor plans to begin construction of the Power Building
roof this month.
Steel baffles have been installed in the basins of the Waste
Sludge Thickenerso All the walls are in place with concrete
work continuing on the parapet areas.
The Digester bridges and stairs have been installed and placing
of the hand railing is continuingo
Electrical trays and conduits are being installed in all tunnel
and basement areaso
~~~~WERt--~~~~
~
L---------------1
JPL ACTS PROCESS PLANT JOB N2 PW~ 045
(
~-----1
I
I c.H~rcti. L -__
~~ I Arz..EA
l
I 1~~1r ---
~A I L _ --
(
CONTRACT PW-045
JPL-ACTS PROCESS PLANT
J. Putnam Hcnck, A Corporation & Henck Pro,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
STARTING DATE: Oct. 1, 1975
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: *
~AID TO DATE:
C orLt!ta.c.,t L!l 6 o Jt c.o n~ .tJt.u.ct<.o n o 6 a. one. mi.lUo n g a1. -
lo n pelt day p.<_lo t wa.o.te.wa.te. 't. tlc.e.a:tme.nt plant a.t
W~tewa.teJt. foe.ai:men-t Pl:mt No. 2. The. pla.n;t w,i.,U
u.&e. a. wU.que Ac.ti..va.ted CaJtbon TJteJLtm.z.nt. Syl;~ern
(ACTS J de. v el.oped by :the N a.tio nai. AeJW ru::.JLti.CA and
Spa.c.e. Agenc.y' !; J e.t PMpui..6-i.on Laboaltto!tLJ. TYU.6
.tJte.atme.n.t method WM pe.Jt6ed.e.d -i.J1 U..6 e.xpe!Umenta.i
.6.tagu w<.tJi a. mobile. :t~ e.a/tch UYLil. opeJULte.d by JP L
pelLhonnel a..t the V.Ll.tJUw' Wa.o.teu:a.te/r.. T Jte.axme.nt.
Pla.n.:t No. 1 .ln Fou.n.:ta..in. Vall.e.y d.wUng 1974-75.
The l;ljl;tem LU> ed ~lu.dge Jtemove.d 6Mm .the. wa.&.tewa.te.Jt
t1J pllodu.c.e. a.W..va..te.d M-'tbcn tJvwu.gh a ptpwly!;,W
Jte.actoJt. The cu::tlva.:t.e.d c.cvr.bon -i.o tJ1en Jt<Un:t'W-
duc.e.d .into the wM.tewa..te.Jt l;t:/f.eam .01 a !; e.c.onda.Juj
JJ.taBe 60Jt addlU.ona.l ,.r..ernoval. o 6 pcliu,t.a.;1.U. Orth/
p<VLti.all.y ~ e.ri a.M.e.Jt .the. .Hcond -6.ta.qe.. iJ1e. aw:va-
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 2 8' 19 7 6
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 28, 1976
t.e.d c.aJr.bon and ~ ec.ondM.y -6ludge. l;lUJUr.1_( ,£!; 6e.d hi.-t.o
the. .ln c.o mi.ng Wa.6 .t ewa.:t.vr.. !; .t!te.am to .lncJr..e M e. !; y l; tern
e. 6 ii-ci.. e.J1CJ.j •
The. mobile. e.xpe.M.me.nt.ai. wU..t ~ ed :t.c 1te.&£ne :tlUJ.,
4y,e,tem 6Jtam la.bolta.:t.o!U.J be.nch e.xpv-i-lmeri..U WM ba,tch
opvuit.e.d wUh me.cJiaiuc.al. handU.ng o 6 ma.te.ucJ: ~tr.cm
.6ta.ge. to ,e,ta.ge.. The. p.il.ot pi.ruit W-i..ll.. be. a. c.ontin-
u.o wd.y Jt.U.YL, a.LLt.o mated .6 yf> .t e.m.
Ah-a. p!Ume. obje.dlve. on .the. ACTS, il. c.oul.d .6olve.
a.n .lnCJt~.lng pJtcblem 06 .6fudge cliApc-6a.l ~ :tJU-6
1111.te/L.lai be.come.Ji mcJte. p.f.enti Sui ~h .lm!=Jrove.d
wa.6.tWa-teJL t.Jc.e.atme.n.t o.nd -i.n0te.rue.d 6.lolC.L In ad.-
di.Lum, .:the. e. 6 6lue.Ji.,t 6Jtom :t.JU,~ .t:i.e.CLt.me.;t-t !; tJ.6 :t.e.m ,£!;
e.:Q:Je.cte.d to me.et the. clW cno.Jtg c. ,'{_~ lU.'t.e.mervt~ 0 ri
the. 0.l~tti/ .. c:Ll' N.P.D.E.S. PV'.!r.il.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Work is progressing on schedule. Contractor has nearly completed
primary and secondary clarifiers.
Foundation slabs for the influent pump station, sludge pump
station, electrical building and filter press building are in
place. The filter press and electrical buildings are partially
complete.
Delivery of the filter press is scheduled for November 2nd.
Above ground piping and installation of the pump station clearwell
has begun. Underground piping, tank construction and calciner
building fabrication is scheduled for November.
*~h-<A ~.on..:t.Juic.t ~ a. de.~.lgn and con~:t.Jiuct co1it)[ac.t wfte!.Jc.eby .t/ie c.011.:t.Ji.ac;tOJt
.U pcud $50, 000. 00 µla.~ .the. a.c.:tLutl coJto 60JL ail fabOJt and ma.tc.'Li.ail;.
DI ST. 2
CONTRACT No. 2-15
r ~ BLVD.
~ -~e. •?"'J;!.>!r'o ~.,._...-, ,~ -CU v1r-~11'"1 IVfV
~
\!)
~
C.AL STATE F'ULLE. RTON C'(
CAMPU5 ~
CONTRACT No. 2-15
YORBA LINDA PUMP STATION
J. Putnam Benck, A Corporation ~ Hcnck Pro,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
START! NG DATE:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT:
• PA I D TO DATE :
Sept. 26, 1974
$671,146.oo
$484,345.90
_. Controct ic ·for the construction of a reinforced
concrete structure to house wet z..ie lls and pwr.ps
for t2unsfe21 ring tributar-::1 UXJ.stewater thmugh a
force 111'.lin line into the Sa:nta Ana River, Carbon
CatnJOn Inte21 ceptor-reUef Trunk Line system for
conveyance to f-lastewater Reclamation Plant Noo 1
in Fountain VaUey. 1'his wi ZZ asnist in re Ueving
the presently congested Ne-~hope-Placentia Trunk
Line a:nd will serve proposed land use development
of the tributary area to the year 2010.
The pvmp station structure is located at the in-
tersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associa:ted
Road in Fullerton. It is being constructed on
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 22, 1975
TI ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 15 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 7, 1975
what L.'as originally University of Califoyr;~ia, Fu7-
lerton prope11 ty at the northern perimeter of Uze
caTTP~us. Special arrangen:cmts were rradc 1,_~itl; thr
Univerdty for use of the property.
The above-ground portion of the structure wi ZZ be
a low profile slab 85' x 109', 2 feet above
ground. The deepest portion of the strv.cture '/.;.,1Hl
be 35 feet under ihe grouni. The District has
agreed to construct a slump-stone fence a~ound the
structure and landscape the area in accordance
tJr: th future compatible use by the Vniversi ty. The
University plans to construct an arboretur.-: in the
irronediate area at some future date.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
CiJ.iU
input lines has been completed and traffic restored to
normal on Associated Road and Yorba Linda Blvd.
., r-"
..L :J
Electrical conduit installation is now 75 percent completeo
Some power wiring has been installed.
Contractor is backfilling on the north and west sides of
the structure bringing the area back to ground levelo
Station flow meter has been installedo The three water
pumps have been delivered and are in the structureo
Construction on the output manifold piping from the pumps
has begun.
Delivery date of the two remaining pump motors is still
undetermined. According to the supplier, they are in transit,
but their immediate whereabouts is unknowno
BIRCH 5T.
IMPERIAL l-IWY.
•
GOLDEN AVE.
BA~TANCHVRY KD. -----
DI ST._2
----COMPLETE
-.., .. TO BE CONSTRUCTED
CONTRACT No. 2-16-1
CONTRACT No. 2-16-1
KRAEMER BOULEVARD INTERCEPTOR SEv/ER,
FROM PALM DRIVE TO IMPERIAL HIGHWAY
George Miller Construction Company, Contractor
STARTING DATE:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT:
PAID TO DATE:
April 24, 19 75
$563,936.80
$602,899.10
Contract is for insta'lZation of 24" and 21" Vi tri-
· fied Clay Pipe (V.C.P.) along Kraemer Bou'levard
from Palm Drive in Placentia to Imperial HiglUJay
in Brea, wi approxima.te distance of 1. 5 miles.
This project is part of the Santa Ana River, Cara-
bon Canyon Interceptor-re'lief system, designed, in
part, to divert fwws from the north portion of
District 2, relieving the presently congested New-
hope-P'lacentia Trunk 'line to Waste?.Jater Rec'lcona-
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 21, 1975
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 21, 1975
tion Plant No. 1 in Fountain VaUey. The southcr-
'ly terminus of the interceptor-relief system is at
the diveraion structure at Plant No. 1.
The KI'aemer Boulevard Interceptor portion of the
interceptor-relief .system is designed to har.dle
flows up to 25 mi Zlion gaUons per day and wi U
serve the proposed land use devewpment in the
tributary area to the year 2010.
ACTIVITIES.DURING THE PAST MONTH
CONTRACT C 0 M P L E T E
DI ST. 3
COMPLETE ---To BE . CONSTRU
CONTRACT
No. 3-20-1
N
CTED
CONTRACT No.3-20-1
KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 5 AND 6
Sully-Miller Contracting Company, Contractor
STARTING DATE:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT:
• PAID TO DATE:
Oct. 31, 1974
$4,602,992.00
$4,047,953.00
. Contract is for instaz:lation of a 66" Reinforced
Concrete Pipe (R.C.P.) trwzk line from the inter-
.section of Goldeni.Jest Street and Westminster Ave-
nue in Westminster to 1200 feet south of KateZZa
Avenue on Knott Avenue in Stanton, a distance of
appro:x:im::zte Zy 2. 8 mi Zes. Knott Avenue is the
northern extension of Goldeni.Jest Street.
Tlzis project is a portion of the }{no tt Interceptor
relief system designed to relieve the presently
congested Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer by intercep-
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 31, 1975
TI ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 31, 1975
ting fZO!.Js from the nort'fz.u.Jest portion of District
3. The southerly terrminus of the system is at the
intersection of Brookhurst Street and Ellis Avenue
in Fountain Valley. It wi 7,7, eventuaZZy extend to
Imperial Avenv.e in La Habra.
This portion of the ·relief system is designed to
handle a flow of '?5 million gallons per day and
rviZZ serve ·the proposed developed Zand use plan in
the tributary area to the yeca 2010.
ACTIVI~IES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Contractor laid 1465 feet of pipe during the month of October.
He has now run out of pipe on hand and discontinued trenching
due to a labor strike at the supplier, Ameron Pipe Coo The
pipe company has been on strike for three weeks at the time of.
this reporto
Thirteen hundred feet of pipe remain to be installed from where
the contractor left off to the end of the jobo Contractor
estimates he can be laying pipe within two weeks after settle-
ment of the supplier's strike. He estimated completion of pipe
laying to the project end within one and one-half months after
termination of the strikeo
Three construction pits are now in Knott Ave. Two, one south
of Chapman Aveo and one south of Belgrave Aveo, are for con-
structing dog-leg structures in the line. The one south of
Belgrave is nearing completiono The third pit is for construction
of a junction box immediately south of Lampson Aveo This project
is nearing completiono
The contractor is concentrating on compacting, grading and paving
to restore Knott Aveo up to Orangewood Aveo as much as possible
to normal traffic flow during this interim periodo Most of Knott
Ave. north of the Garden Grove Freeway is experiencing no traffic
difficultieso
JI'-----~L INCO~/.N ---JI l.____~AVE ______ . ----'I L
RANGE
CERRITO.$
CITY
tJF ~. P.
DI ST. 3 CYPRES S
--.coMPLE'I1E
AT.E LLA
1.n ms -TO BE CON STRUC TED
CO N TR AC T N o. 3-20-2
CITV OF
ANAl-IEIM
OLINDA
AV£.
A VE.
~-
.G VRA CUSE
AVE.
N
r\ .. 1.·
CONTRACT No. 3-20-2
KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 7
A. G~ Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Co.,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
STARTING DATE: March 6, 1975
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $3,876,870.00
PAI 0 TO DATE: $2,264,736.oo
"contract is for instal.lation of a Reinforced Con-
crete Pipe (R.C.P.) sewer line from a point 1200
feet south of Kate Ua Avenue on Knott Avenue in
Stanton, north on Knott Avenue to Lincoln Avenue
in Anaheim, a distance of 2. 3 miies. Pipe diame-
"i·"'rs are 72 11 for the first 3, 900 feet, 63" for
f, too feet and 66" for the re1r.aining 1200 feet of
i. he pmj ect. nows from this reach wi l Z drain in-
to Contract 3-20-1 to the south.
This project is a portion of the Knott Interceptor
reZief system designed to relieve the presently
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: March 6, 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: March 6, 1976
congested Miller-Holder Trur1.k Ser.Jer by intercep-
ting f'lowD from the north.Jest portion of District
3. The southerly terminus of the system is at the
intersection of Brookhurst Street and Ellis Avenue
in Fountain Valley. It wiU eventuaUy extend to
Imperial Avenue in La. 'Habra.
This portion of the relief system is designed to
handle a flow of 68 million gallons per ckrd and
LJiil serve the pmposed developed land use pl.an in
the tributary area to the year 2010.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Contractor laid 1102 feet of pipe during October. He has passed Ball Road
and is about 600 feet north on Knott Avenue with his heading.
A bore pit has been dug at the intersection of Knott Ave. and Orange Ave. to
facilitate an eight-inch boring diagonally across the intersection and con-
nection of a bypass from an existing sewer line through a manhole structure
that will be constructed where the bore-pit iso
The contractor has encountered poor trenching conditions north of Ball Road
due to the dry sand sub-strata, requiring a wider trench and slower progress
than desired. The wider trench also makes traffic diversion difficult.
District staff is conferring with the City of Anaheim on the advisability of
closing down the section of Knott Ave. between Ball Road and Orange Ave. to
all but local traffic to speed up the work. It is anticipated the contractor
can reach and pass the Orange Aveo, Knott Ave. intersection by the first week
in December if street closure is allowed, or by the first week in January if
it is noto
A District representative has visited all the shops in the shopping center
at the intersection of Orange Ave. and Knott Ave. and explained the scope of
construction work and scheduling to owners/managers of the businesses.
Contractor successfully laid the 24" sewer to the junction structure in the
middle of the intersection of Knott Ave. and Katella Ave. and the 36'' flood
control line that rounds the intersection corner heading north during October.
A break in an 8" water line adjacent to the work site November 27th necessi-
tated closing the intersection for a dayo Restricted traffic will be neces-
sary into the first week in November while repairs are being made, compaction
._.,,insured and the intersection repavedo
_ :..k'ATELlA AV£_
: ••·-·•·Lf•• ~,;~1, ·~r .;;..:-~ -
••----..... FARGt.JJ.IAK AVE. .___
Ol?ANGEWOOD AVE.
"' ~ ....
.....
~
~ ..
~fll
1;.._1 _W_Y. _
-----1
I
"' e \) I
.
~-~ , .. ~ ~: q,.o~ o.tt:f-»{'4'\~V.. :
""' . BRADBURY :..__K_D. __
DI ST. 3
-~COMPLETE
-.... TO BE CONSTRUCTED
CONTRA.CT
No. 3 -21 -1
---------;------
• --.1
I
m
I
CONTRACT No. 3 -21 -1
WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR,
REACHES 25, 26 & PORTION OF 27
A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Company,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
STARTING DATE: June 2 6' 1975
~ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $1, 416, 448 .00
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 22, 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 C~lendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 22, 1976 PAID TO DATE: $994,461.07
Contract is for the installation of a Vitrified
Clay Pipe (V.C.P.) sewer from the vicinity of the
District's Westside Lift Station, 1800 feet west
of Seal Beach Boulevard and Lampson Avenue along
the flood control channel, along the channel to
Seal Beach Boulevarid where it turns north along
Los Alamitos BoulevaI'd (the northern extension of
Seal Beach Boulevard) to Katella Avenue. It then
turns east on Katella to Lexington Drive, where it
tenninates. Pipe diameter is 39" for the first
f>, f>OO feet, 36" for the next 5, 700 feet and 30"
for the final 5, 200 feet. Total length is approx-
im:i.te ly 3.1 miles.
tion of Seat Beach Boulevard and Westminster Ave-
nue in the City of Seal Beach. Tri.e system will
eventually run generally in a northerly direction
through the ZJestern portion of District 3 and ZJill
terminate at Cresent.Avenue and Moody Street in
the City of La Palnu.
Upon corrpletion, the system will relieve the Los
Alamitos Subtrunk Sewer ZJhich, at present, fur.c-
tions as the main interceptor sewer for the West-
side basin and, for the most part, is c:urrently
flCMing at or near peak capacity.
This portfon of the relief interceptor is designed
to handle flows of up to 14.'l miUion gallons per
day and will serve the proposed developed Zand use
plan in the tributary area to the yea:r 2010.
This project is a continuation of the Westside
Relief Interceptor sewer which begins at the Seal
Beach Boulevard Pwrrping Station at the intersec-
...
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Contractor laid 5620 feet of pipe during the month. The northern·
portion of the job through the City of Los Alamitos is essentially
complete from Rossmoor Way, north on Los Alamitos Blvdo to Katella
· Aveo and east on Katella to Lexington Dro All that remains in this
section is completion of a bore hole across Katella Ave. and con-
struction of a manhole on the other side of the street at the ter-
minus of the job. This will be completed by Deco 1 to be out of
the way of race track traffic which begins Deco 2.
On the southern heading in Seal Beach, the contractor has laid pipe
across the Bixby Ranch property along the flood control channel and
is now proceeding north on Seal Beach Blvdo in front of the Rossmoor
Shopping Center.
Traffic in this section has been diverted to the west side of the
street and restricted to one lane north and south. The street has
been restriped to allow left-turn pockets into each of the shopping
center entranceso
A Sanitation District representative has visited each of the stores
in the center and explained the construction work, its pur)ose and
the work sch~dule to owners/managerso
The contractor is working ten-hour work days to expedite completion
of this stretch and minimize the affect on businesses within the
center. He.is anticipated to be past the center and traffic
restored to normal by the first week in December.
FAIRHAVEN AVE..._
N
•
, .
D\ST. 7
-m COMPLETE
-.--TO BE CONSTRUCTED
-coNTRACT No.1-6-7 __ 1_n_v1=N=£==~
CONTRACT No.7-6-7
TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, REACH 11 & PORTION OF 12
Rogers & Davies, Contractor
STARTING DATE: May 29, 1975 CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Nov. 25, 1975
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $ 3~9, 818. 00 TI ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PAID TO DATE:
~
$348,626.00 PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Nov. 25, 1975
Contract is for the installation of 1. 7 miles of
''Vitrified CZay Pipe (V. C. P.). The project starts
This project is part of the m:ister-p lanr:.ed Tustir.-
Orange Trwzk Lir..e Relief system. It i.,.,'>i, zi eventu-
ally extend north to ViZla.·Park Road and Santia~~
Boulevard in Orange, proviaing drainage for the
central and northern portions of District 7.
at the intersection of Irvine Boulevard and Nez,;-
port Avenue in Tustin and goes north along the
Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-wcy to 17th
Street in County territory. It continues north in
Esplanade Avenue to Fairhaven Avenue, where it
tiwns east for 100 feet and terminates o Pipe dia-
meter is 24" for the first ?, 000 feet of the pro-
ject. The remaining pipe is 21" in diameter.
This section of the system is designed to handle
flows up to 9. 6 4 mi Z Zion gal Zons per da.y and wi Zl
serve proposed land use development of the tribu-
ta.ry area to the year 2010.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
SUMMARY
TREATMENT PLANT WORK
Total Value Under Contract $29,876,000 $29,876,000
Total Work to Date 21,331,307
Total Work During October 1,829,022
DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK
Total Value Under Contract $19,536,630 $19,536,630
Total Work to Date 8,743,003
Total Work During October 1,294,697
Total Work Awaiting Award 2,116,676 2,116,676
TOTAL AMOUNT UNDER CONTRACT AND AWAITING AWARD $51,529,306
\ ,
November 7, 1975
Members present :
Members absent:
Others present:
Staff present :
REPORT OF ntE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Meeting Date : October 23, 1975
5:3o ·p .m.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFO RN IA
P.O . BOX 8127
I 0 844 ELLIS A V EN UE
FO UN T A IN V ALLEY, CALIFO RN I A 92708
(71 4 ) 5 40 -2910
(714 ) 9 62-2411
Donald Winn, Joint Chairman, Phillip Cox, Don Mc!nnis,
John Store, John Garthe, Laurence Schmit, Robin Young,
Vernon Evans
Norma Brandel Gibbs, Vice Joint Chairman, Michael Callahan,
Kerm Rima
Harvey Hunt, John Carollo Engineers, Walt Howard, John
Carollo Engineers, Thomas L. Woodruff
Fred A. Harper, General Manager, Ray E. Lewis, Chief
Engineer, J . Wayne Sylvester, Director of Finance
Convened:
Adjourned:
5:30 p.m.
7:15 p.m.
* * * * * * * * * *
The Executive Committee met to review the progress of the preparation of
the Districts' Facilities Plan and Environmental Impact Statement for improved
treatment and the status of the construction of the 1-MGD JPL Activated Carbon
Treatment process unit.
Following a discussion of the progress to date and revi ew of alternative
plans presented by the staff, the Committee directed the staff to request a
meeting of the State Water Resources Control Board and Environmental Protection
Agency officials with the Executive Committee to receive their views on the
staff's suggested alternatives.
Attached is a staff memorandwn outlining alternativ es which will be
considered at the meeting. (The Executive Committee i s scheduled to meet with
the representatives of the State Water Resources Control Board and the
Environmental Protection Agency on November 25th , at ·10 :30 A.M. at the Newport
Beach Marriott Hotel.)
MEMORANDUM
October 23, 1975
TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager
FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(71 '4) 962-2411
SUBJECT: Status of Step I Grant -Facilities Plan and Environmental Impact
Stateme.nt for Improved Treatment of the Joint Facilities
At a special Board Meeting in March of this year, ·staff presented to the Boards
scheduling· for preparation of a Facilities Plan and Environmental Impact Statement
for Improved ~reatment at the Joint Facilities which included the construction of
a 1-MGD JPL Activated Carbon Treatment System for the purpose of the evaluation of
the p::::Tfon}1ance and the cost effectiveness of this new \\'ast0 t:rcatment nrocess.
The schedule presented to the Boards and as shown on the attached chart .... delineates,
by colored arrow, certain key decision points that must be made in order that the
Distl'icts will be eligible to share in the State and Federal funding prior to the
expiration of these funds on September 30, 1977. This status report is to inform
you and the Boards that the construction and the anticipated operation of the 1-MGD
activated carbon process is on schedule as presented, and barring any unforeseen
delays, sufficient operational data should be available by February 1, 1976 to
make the decision of whether to continue with the .JPL process or to abandon the
process and proceed to meet our requirements employing conventional processes.
Because of the magnitude of the improved treatment program which.has been estimated
between $200 and $300 million, and since that commitment by the State and Environmental
Protection Agency for grant funds must be made on or before September 30, 1977, I
feel it is only prudent that we reexamine our ~nplcmentation of this schedule in the
event other courses of action may develop which would be to the advantage of the
Districts. Some of the alternatives that should be discussed arc as follows:
A. Double Tracking Design Concept
This procedure would direct the engineer to commence concurrent
design on both the JPL-ACTS Process and the Conventional
Treatment Process for required facilities at Plant No. 2. The
Step I Grant which was received in March of this year authorized
this "double tracking'1 for design if necessary in· an amount not
to ex~ced $350,000. There docs appear to be a need for clarifi-
cation from the State and EPA whether the Facilities Plan and
Environmental Impact Statement need to be completed prior to
commencing of any design for any type of facility. Tiie double
To: Fred A. Harper
October 23, 1975
Page Two·
tracking design procedure would allow sufficient time to receive
concept approval for grant monies prior to September 30, 1977.
It would require design of facilities that may not be used and~
therefore, a loss of engineering time and monies associated
therewith.
0
B. Two-Stage Facilities Approach
This alternate would require a portion of the total 175-MGD
of improved treatment at Plant No. 2 to be constructed by the
utilization of conventional treatment processes. If the Districts'
consultants preparing the Facilities Plan and Environmental Impact
Statement were directed to prepare "mini reports"_which included
a.report for 50-75 MGD improved treatment for activated sludge at "
Plant No. 2, and an Envi:conrnental Impact Report was prepared
concurrently, the State and EPA could conceivably declare a
negative declaration on this phase of improved treatment and
subsequently give concept approval to this first phase of additions'
at. Plant No. 2. Redirecting the consultants to prepare these ,.~.
"mini reports" could delay the final preparation of the Environmental
Impact Statement and Facilities Plan for a period of approximately
60-days, but it would have the advantage that it would allow more
·time for the operation and evaluation of the JPL-ACTS Process. -~-
It is the staff's understanding that no additional facilities for capacity can be
commenced until the completion of the Environmental Impact Statement. The
Alternate B presented above will delay the final preparation of the Environmental
Impact Statement, ·but could allow the Districts to proceed in a more orderly manner
as far as improved tre_atment at Plant No. 2. It docs appear advisable at this time
that members of the Boards meet with the top executives of the State and
Envirorunental Protection Agency" along with staff to discuss these al te111atives. A
similar meeting was held in December, 1974 which did prove to be very informative
and beneficial to both parties. It is my personal recommendation that a meeting be
set as soon as possible, perhaps sometime.in the later part of November, in order
that the Boards may have sufficient time at the December Board Meeting to redirect
the scheduling if it is necessary.
REL:hje
. •.
1 ..
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
SCHEDULING FOR IMPROVED 'TREATMENT .
· I I I I -I
AUTHORIZE E .l.S.
FACILITIES PLAN
JPL PILOT WORK
I I I I J
I SUBMIT E.l.S . ANO
FACILITIES PLAN
MAFtCH 1974
---I FACILITIES PLAN*:----'~, DECISI~: ~:~UIRED I
.__ _______ --J
I I I I I I
~ I I I I I I
SUBMIT PLANS ANO
SPECIFICATIONS FOR
IMPROVED TREATMENT
•
I PILOT Al R AND I I 0E s 1 GN oF SECONDARY I I REVIEW a I 1
1
CONSTRUCTION ........ 1-+41 OXYGEN A .s . 1M--+~~L ..... -411o--.+--+--·-I TR EAT ME NT li--;-~•)-'41o-41e1001 No ,-........... ~~-:. _____ _
, ~,.,,.J,.LL '~"°' ~· j •rnn I : L}"J' 1
• I I , I
I I
s
1
TATl£MEI NTI
1 1 11
•
1
JPI. TESTING ~E;~·1 c~101:11~POUNDEO
• _"_j OE SIGN AND CONSTRUCT __ __.._ ... O_P_E_R_A._T_E -~--
4 n JPL PILOT PLANT PILOT PL :~
FUNDS MUST BE ALLOCATED
*FACILITIES PLAN. TO INCLUDE
TWO RECOMM E NDED PLANS
JPL AND CONVENTIONAL A .S.
l I I I I I I -I I
.& ' M A M J J A 9 0 N Q J f M A M J J A S 0 N D .I ,..-• A M J J A I 0 N D
1175 19TT
REPORT OE THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WILL BE MEETING
NOVEMBER 25TH WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF THE REGIONAL EPA OFFICE
AND THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD TO REVIEW THE CURRENT
STATUS OF THE PREPARATION OF THE DISTRICTS' FACILITIES PLAN AND
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR IMPROVED TREATMENT. AT THAT
TIME, WE WILL EXPLORE SOME ALTERNATE PLANS WHICH HAVE BEEN
PRESENTED BY THE STAFF.
THE COMMITTEE'S MAJOR CONCERN IS THAT 62~ MILLION IN GRANT
FUNDS WHICH ARE EARMARKED FOR OUR DISTRICTS FOR IMPROVED TREATMENT
ARE NOT LOST BECAUSE OF DELAYS WHICH COULD RESULT FROM OUR EFFORTS
TO PROVE OUT THE JPL SYSTEM. WE WANT EPA's VIEWS ON SOME POSSIBLE
ALTERNATE APPROACHES TO SPEEDING UP ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION AT THE
TREATMENT WORKS.
THE COMMITTEE WILL BE REPORTING TO THE BOARDS ON' OUR MEETING
WITH STATE AND FEDERAL PEOPLE AS WELL AS OTHER MATTERS AT THE
DECEMBER BOARD MEETING.
•
AGENDA ITEM 2L_
S T A F F REPORT
November 6, 1975
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
I 0844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
Acquisition of Right-of-Way for Santa Ana River Interceptor Contracts 2-41-4 & 2-14-5
Mr. Carl Boznanski of Donahue and Co., Inc. has transmitted copies of the
preliminary appraisal pursuant to the Board's authorization. The preliminary
appraisal, which includes the acquisition of the permanent easement, utilization
of the temporary construction easements, removals and replacement of citrus
trees and the loss of income from the prohibition of agricultural activities,
has been estimated at approximately $100,000. This preliminary appraisal does
not include acquisition of the surface rights.
Prior to the employment of the appraiser, the staff was in contact with the County
Parks and Trails personnel to pursue a cooperative effort in the event that a
joint use of the right-of-way could be made by both the Sanitation District and
the County Parks and Trails Department. The Parks and Trails Department has
transmitted to the staff a map delineating those reaches of the sewer right-of-way
which could be considered for joint use. The staff did not instruct the appraiser
to consider acquisition of the surface rights because of the timing and other
agendes affected, namely the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, the State
Water Resources Control Board and the Environmental Protection Agency. The staff
will continue to work with the Parks and Trails Department, but would like
direction from the Board regarding acquisition of surface rights.
Some of the general evaluation comments made by the appraiser are as follows:
No consideration in the study was given to the conversion of the
permanent easement area to one "in fee" which could be utilized for
horse or bicycle trails. This restriction would increase the total
acquisition cost several thousands of dollars. Such a use could have
impacts in regard to substantial severance damage because of the
physical severing of access from one portion of the larger parcel to
another •
In the evaluation of damages, the appraiser assumed that all roads,
fences, irrigation slopes and irrigation systems are to be replaced
in kind by the general contractor subsequent to the installation of
the sewer facilities. These provisions are covered in the contract
documents at this time. No damages were assessed for these purposes.
Specific valuation of ingress and egress rights to the metering station
to be located at the County line on the Green Acres Golf Course property
was not made since the staff indicated to the appraiser that such rights
shall be agreed upon separately.
Staff Report
November 6, 1975
The appraiser met with both the major property owners and some of the conversations
with same are:
Mr. Ernest Bryant
He does not want to have to deal with contractors separately on the
easement areas. He wants to deal with the District only.
He is concerned with the replacement of all roads that are to be
interfered with.
On Plate 28 of the Plan and Profile, Contract 2-·14-4, he says that there
is a 6" water pipe, now shown, that crosses the right-of-way.
He was concerned with the continuation of irrigation during the project.
He mentioned the need for runoff irrigation on Plates 23 and 28.
On Plate 26, he mentioned the well at the east end and the need to watch
out for it during construction.
He was concerned with the removal of large trees which serve as a neces-
sary wind break.
Mr. Terry, Manager, Santa Ana Valley Irrigation Company
On Plate 8 of Contract 2-14-5, he was concerned with the protection to
the well and pump.
The main paved road, along which the sewer is to run, must be replaced.
The elevated manholes might pose a problem unless the road is offset
from its present alignment.
He suggested that during construction a secondary access road, along
the old canal, be partially repaved so as to provide ingress and egress
for two of the tenants that reside on the property.
He also mentioned that he would like to see the canal filled in with
some of the excess dirt.
He was concerned with interruption of the picking season which ends in
early October.
The Weir Canyon property is presently being run by a Mr. Warren Hillebrecht.
The Green River property is under a long term lease with Mr. Hank Bickler
and those property matters will have to be handled through him.
-2-
Staff Report
November 6, 1975
The permanent easement area is 30-feet in width with the sewer offset in the
event that additional facilities are needed at some time in the future. This
width is a minimum width which is required for maintenance of the facility.
Property owners will be allowed to utilize the surface area of this permanent
easement. The permanent ~~sement area in the Bryant properties is approximately
10-1/4 acres and that property owned by Santa Ana Valley Irrigation Company is
3.23 acres and 1.9 acres in the Green River Golf Course area. Additional
right-of-way is required for temporary construction purposes which totals 26.42
acres.
REL:hje
-3-
November 7, 1975
CouNTY SANITATION D1s1 Ri\.
of ORANGE COUNTY, CAL1FOr1:·
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 927C,
(71.C) 540-2910
(71.C) 962-2411
STAFF REPORT ON "208" PLANNING FOR-THE SOUTH COAST AREA
In April, the State Board held a hearing in Los Angeles
on "208" Planning and determined that there was little local
support for a single designation for the entire South Coast
Area. Therefore, the Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino,
and Riverside County areas continued to carry the State
Board's earlier decision of "non designation".
Subsequently, a District of Columbia court ruled that
208 Planning must be accomplished throughout the United States
and that the State was to do the planning in the non designated
areas. This court decision may have prompted the State Board
to send out a notice dated .August 4th~ expressing their intent
to pursue the establishment of one or more 208 pl~nning areas
in the South Coast Area.
On August 15th, your General Manager, in concert with the
City Engineer of the City of Los Angeles and the General
Manager of the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, re-
sponded to the Executive Officer of the State Water Resources
Control Board, suggesting a Joint Powers Agency comprised of
the Clty of Los Angeles, the Sanitation Districts of Los
Angeles, ourselves, and similar agencies with jurisdictional
responsibilities outside the boundaries of the three major
agencies. Attached is a copy of the August 15th joint letter
to the Executive Officer of the State Board, and his "response"
dated October 29th. Also enclosed is a copy of EPA's areawide
waste treatment planning pamphlet which describes the purpose
of "208" planning.
The State Board staff has indicated that through the develop-
ment of their basin plans and other regional water quality planning
efforts, substantial water quality control problems in this area
are lacking. In our opinion, this would indicate that a 208
Planning Agency is not required ·
On November 17th, the State Water Resources Control Board
will conduct a public hearing in Los Angeles to receive testimony
to determine if any part of the South Coast Area should be -
designated as an areawide waste treatment management planning
area and the appropriate planning agency(s) to conduct the work.
We believe the emphasis of the 208 planning effort in the
South Coast Area will be on air quality matters, land use, and
transportation, and their relationships to existing water quality
improvement plans. Because of the far-reaching ramifications
I
this program may have on our efforts, we have invited Mr. Bill ........-
Davis, in charge of 208 planning for the State Board, and Mr.
James Anderson, Executive Officer of the Regional Water Quality
Control Board, to attend Wednesday's Board meeting to more
fully inform the Board.
The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)
has been actively seeking the designation for the South Coast
Area. Their Executive Director, Mr. Ray Remy, has had dis-
cussions with the Los Angeles City Engineer, the Manager of
the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, and myself, as to
our roles in the event SCAG would be designated by the State
and approved by EPA. Enclosed is Mr. Remy's proposal for a
"208" Planning organization which, in effect, would place our
agencies in an advisory capacity with little or no authority
to approve or disapprove any plan that may be developed.
As of this writing, your staff does not have a specific
recommendation. However, at Wednesday!s Board meeting we will
outline several alternatives which the Boards may wish to con-
sider. I can assure our Directors that your staff is not
anxious to get deeply involved in this type of planning effort,
particularly in those areas of air quality, land use, and trans-
portation.· Our major concern is that the water quality improve-
ment plans for the Santa Ana River Basin are not disrupted by
planners who have little or no knowledge in.the water pollutioD
control field. The current planning efforts required by the
Federal construction grant program have caused innumerable
delays in getting needed construction under way. In our view,
while we have been told this won't happen, the "208" planning
designee could further delay needed projects for several years
while they look at elusive secondary environmental impacts that
we in the dirty water business can't change anyhow.
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
Mr. Larry F. Walker
Division Chief
November 4, 1975
Manager, Clean Water Grant Program
State Water Resources Control Board
P. 0. Box 100
Sacramento, CA 95801
Re: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Step 1,
Project No. 75-1073, Sewer Use Ordinance
Your 510:RAG
Attention: Mr. Raymond Walsh
Item No. /!;
TELE PH ON ES:
AR EA C 0 DE 71 4
540-2910
962-2411
Pursuant to your letter of October 24, and our telephone
conve~s~ticn c~ Octobe~ 30, this lette~ is writte~ to f~rther
explain our position on those provisions of our ordinance
which are causing concern to the State Water Resources Control
Board staff.
·continued Use of Ad Valorem Taxes
The ordinance revenue provisions continue to rely
principally on ad valorem taxes even though the General
Accounting Office has written the EPA advising that, in
its opinion, this is contrary to the intent of PL 92-500.
As you know, the EPA Administrator has recommended to
the Congress that PL 92-500 be amended to permit the use
of ad valorem taxes and HR 9560 has been introduced by
the Congressional leaders of the House Public Works
Committee which specifically authorizes their use. In
addition, I understand the State Water Resources Control
Board has urged the California delegation to support ad
valorem tax use legislation.
While we recognize that as of this date the use of ad
valorem taxes cannot be approved, there appears to be
sufficient action going on in the Congress on this matter
to believe that ad valorem taxes may once again be an
Mr. Larry Walker
November 4, 1975
Page 2
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8 1 2 7
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-291 a
(714) 962-2411
authorized revenue source. Therefore, we do not intend
to amend the revenue portion of the ordinance at this
time. In the event that Congress specifically rejects
the use of ad valorem taxes, our Board will then consider
amending our ordinance to provide for the necessary
revenues in accordance with that action. ·
Heavy Metal Discharge Concentrations and Compliance Dates
There appears to be a considerable amount of confusion
as to the reasons why our Sanitation Districts have
proposed a phasing of restrictions on heavy metal dis-
charge concentrations to the sewer system. The proposed
source-control progrrun provides for a substantial reduction
in the discharge of heavy metals on July 1, 1976, and
another significant reduction by July 1, 1978, with a
final reduction by the individual perraittee3 not later
than July l, 1983. By 1978 our discharge to the ocean
will be substantially in compliance with all the heavy
metal restrictions set forth in the State's Ocean Plan
except chromium (see attached schedule).
The July 1, 1983 restrictions are marked tentative as the
Districts' improved treatment facilities will not be com-
pleted and operational until 1983. The concentration
numbers for heavy metals to be imposed on industrial dis-
chargers in 1983 are tentative at this time because of
our inability to determine that the numbers are adequate
to insure compliance.
Federal Pretreatment Requirements
We believe Sections 302.2 and 302.3-b of our ordinance
provide for any Federal and/or State requirements. " ... The
conditions of wastewater discharge permits shall be uniformly
enforced by the District in accordance with this ordinance
and applicable State and Federal regulations."
"Section 302.3-b Pretreatment Requirements"
"Users shall make wastewater acceptable under the limitations
established under this ordinance before discharging to any
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
Mr. Larry Walker
November 4, 1975
Page 3
public sewer. Any facilities required to pretreat
wastewater shall be provided and maintained at the '
user's expense ... "
Definition of Industry
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-241 1
The staff will recommend that a definition of industry
will be included in an amendment to the proposed ordinance
prior to its effective date July 1, 1976.
On behalf of the Boards of Directors of the Districts, I request
that this information be reviewed by your staff for approval of
the manner in which we are proceeding. We believe that while
there may be some variation in the detailed provisions of the
law at this time, the Districts are certainly acting within the
intent of PL 92-500.
Thank you for your consideration.
~-~· )L-y-~'-
Fred A. Harper ·
General Manager
cc: Members of the Boards of Directors
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
(
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
EFFECTS OF SOURCE CONTROL PROGRAM AND IMPROVED TREATMENT
July 1, 1976 July 1, 1978 --California Ocean Plan Industrial lndustrial2
1-'PDES LU.its Ocean Industrial Industrial Ocean
Inplant1
30-Day Discharge Inplant Discharge Reduction Dischargt: Discharge Reduction
Constituent Average, mg/l 1!1&/l Removal, \ Limit, mg/l \ mg/l Removal, \ Limit, mg/1 \ ----
Cadaita 0.02 0.032-0.034 lS -20 s.o 56 0.02-0.C23 2S -30 3.0 66
Chroeiua o.oos O.lS -0.17 25 -30 6.0 49 0.10-0.11 35 -40 2.0 66
Copper 0.20 0.27 -0.29 25 -30 10.0 SS 0.20-0.2_2_ 3S -40 4.0 71
Lead 0.10 g,Q8 -0:10 25 -30 2.0 72 2.0
Nickel 0.10 0.09 -0.10 10 -12 10.0 65 10.0
Zinc 0.30 0.35 -0.38 35 -40 15.0 40 0.28-0.31 4S -50 10.0 cs
Arsenic 0.01 Q.:.QQ2.
Cyanide (Total) 0.10 ~
Mereury 0.001 ( 2..:..Q.Q!
Silver 0.02 ~
1. With SO ~ activated sludge at Plant No. 1.
2. A!S compared to pre-July 1, 1976, conditions.
3. A!SsUJl.ing activated sludge at both Plants No. 1 and No. 2.
(
November C, 1975
July 1, 1983
Ocean Industrial Industrial'
Discharge Inplant3 Discharge lleGuction
mg/l Removal, \ Limit, mg/l \
.011-0.012 30 -JS tl
.052-.058 40 -45 0.5 91
.17 -.18 40 -4S 2.0 81
.23 -.25 SO -SS 2.0 69
GOLDEN WEST FERTILIZER COMPANY
80 I I Irvine Boulevard Santa Ana, Calif. 92705
Phone (714) 832-1860
November 11, 1975
Board of Directors
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject: Sludge Sales Bid, S-016
Attention: Mr. Fred Harper
Agenda i li:m No. I sJ. -
Due to terminology of the subject bid and subsequent conversation
with District personnel, there is an apparent misinterpretation
of terms of bid items.
If the contract for sludge sales is as implied, previous to
October 30, 19?5 in writing and verbally, that the successful
bidder remove all sludge as produced from the conveyors or
hoppers exclusively by his own equipment, Golden West Fertilizer
Company bid remains "as is."
If the contract for sludge sales is as implied to subsequent
meetings held verbally after October 30, 19?5, that the County
would remove all sludge as produced from the conveyors or hoppers
exclusively by their own equipment, then Golden West Fertilizer
Company would have bid an offer to pay County $1.00/yard and as
not stated under bid item #3 because it was understood by the
document of Sludge Sales Bid, S-016 that bidder would exclusively
use his own equipment to remove all sludge as produced from the
conveyors or hoppers.
Another questionable area under bid item #2 was the transportation
of wet sludge from conveyor belt to an off-site area. Under the
bid specifications and verbal conversations ·with County officials
pertaining to the trucking of wet sludge from the conveyor belt,
this bidder was informed that tank-type trailers would have to be
used for the removal of this wet sludge. Subsequent to October JO,
1975, bidder has understood that open-type trailers could be used
for the purposes. of transporting this wet .sludge, and thereby
would have bid a price of $-2.00/yard.
Golden West Fertilizer Company-feels that. these items·. are .necessary
for discussion previous to the Board of Directors being able to
come to a decision concerning the contract for sludge removal.
Sincerely,
p~ OJ {j ., ,. . ~
Paul A. Cooper
Golden West Fertilizer Company
.,~""''"""' '''°'"' i\V• < '>" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
'· .
···.
11-12-75
M E M 0 R A N D U M
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 812 7
108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71.C) 5"40-2910
(71.C) 962-2411
TO: Members of the Boards of Directors
·FROM: Fred Harper
RE: 208 Planning
The following are alternatives with regard to 208 Planning:
(1) That the Southern California Association of Governments
(SCAG) be designated as the planning agency
(2) A Joint Powers arrangement involving the City of Los
Angeles, Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts,
Orange County Sanitation Districts, the Counties of
possibly Ventura, the Metropolitan Water District,
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, etc., with
each entity accepting the responsibility of doing
the planping within their expertise
(3) Four separate planning agencies involving a Joint
Powers arrangement in each of the counties, bringing
the disciplines together
(4) Currently being explored by the State Water Resources
Control Board with EPA will be the designation of SCAG
which would assemble existing land-use plans and
obtain from utilities agencies the best service plans to
satisfy existing land-use plans. SCAG would prepare
an Environmental Impact Statement based on existing
plans and determine the costs necessary to meet
environmental standards. For each alternate land-use
plan to meet EPA and State environmen~al standards,
SCAG would prepare the alternate land-use plans and the
utility agencies would provide SCAG with the utility
plans to serve the alternate land-use plan areas. SCAG
would then develop a recommended 208 plan which includes
all the disciplines. This recommended 208 plan would
then be passed to the utility agencies for certification
by their governing bodies that the wastewater management
portion of the plan for their service areas is approved
by the governing body of each local agency prior to
submittal to the SCAG executive body for approval.
and submittal to the State .and EPA.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the Boards direct the staff to work
with EPA, the State, SCAG, the counties and other local entities
in the de~e. opment of an areawide 208 plan in accordance with
Alternate , whereby SCAG would be designated as the lead agency
with a pr ision that the wastewater management portions of any
plan beli proved by the governing bodies of the local agencies
prior t SCAG approval and submittal to State and Federal
author:L ies.
j
f) ,,
f' I
MEET I NG DATE November 12, 1975 T I iv1 E 7: 30 p . rn. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 ,7 & 11
DISTRICT 1 a<" "r oiL'9
~ '/ ~ (A_ \fUt1JY. . . . . . _L_ ----~ EDR~CH) .•••• BATTIN •••. _/_ ---_v_ ~EVANS •••••••• GARTHE •••• -'-_J_ -"-
E I " -../ SHARP •••••••• SALTAR LL · ------
DISTRICT 2 -----~
,J
LYONS · · · • • • • • CALLAH ••• _I ___ -_1 _
EWING •••• • • • .c -••••• -"-__ -_.;_
DIEDRICH).···· CLARK •••••• -" __ .a. __ .1 _
GARTtiE) •.• ···.EVANS •••••. _-.1 __ ...1--__ 1_
THOM) ••••••••• KAYWOOD •••. ~-~-__:(__
FOX) •..•.• • • • • MAC KA IN ••• __L_ __ -_.1_
PERRY. • • • • • I (}.... "
!SVALSTAD) ••••• scOTT •••••• I -'
PEREZ).······· • • • • .; -~ DUNN~).·· • • ··.WINN ••••••• -, -----~ -
WARD) ••••••••• WOOD ••••••• -,---_ -i -
GRAHAM) ••••••• YOUNG •••••• / -~
,J
DISTRICT 3 (HOMRIGHAUSEN)~ • • • • • • _, __ .,,. __ .;_ ~: • • • • • • _I_:!:____ -"-
(COLL I NS)·· • • • ·BYRNE. • •• • • _, ___ --" _
CULVER· •• •• -" _ -~-_, _ ~~IFFIN)· ·····DAVIS··· •• ·~_,..._--"-
~~THE).······ EVANS. ••••• _I __ ,... __ .1 _
MAC Kr I N) • •••• FOX· • • • • • • • _L_ __ --" _
SONJU • • • •• • • • FRANKi Eijl&H rµ ~ _t;..._
NEV I l-· · · · . · · . GRAHAM •• ~. ~ ___:: _1 _
THOM)·····.· •• KAYWOOD •••• -"--~-~
BLACKMAN) •• • •• MC KNEW •••• _J_ --=.. __ld::·c....
DIEDRJCH) •• • •• SCHMIT ••••• _J ___ -_ --~-
GIBBS) •••••••• SHIPLEY •••• _v_ ±___ -"-
STANTON) •••••• SVALSTAD. • • J >--"
wooD) ••••••••• wARD....... v == ~
ARBISO) ••••••• WEISHAUPT. _i_ __ --"'-
DISTRICT 5 ~P.
(RYCKOFF). • • • • MC l_NNI • • _.1 __ ...+-__ ./_
(DIEDRICH).···· -E • • • • • ---L -~-_.,_
ROGERS • • • • _.J __ ...... __ /_
DISTRICT 7 __ -,
(r ·~NS) ••.••• ( GAAJJ:i> ..... _1 __ ). __ v_
~ l'M'f HON Y) • • • • • !nnff ON • • • • • ___S!::_ _'-_ ~
DIEDRICH)···· CLARK • •• • • -"-· _+-__ v_
MC INN Is) • • • • DOSTAL····· _.;_ ----__ .1_
() GLOCKNER • • • _J __ ... __ ../_ (~~,. t"/' ) ... · · · JAC Kl1AN-:-••• _L_ __ -_v _
(SHA~P) • • • • • • • SALTARELLI·~ __ --"-
DISTRICT 11 /--~
(DIEDRICH) ••• ~f t!t:1J.¥ .... · . _..; ___ --"' _
(GI BBS) ••••••• nttKE • • • • • • • ./ __ --"' _
(WIEDER) •.•••• GIBBS. ~at\ •. --r-_.J. __ ./_
~!STRICT 8 /J
MITCHELL··· __ ----
(JOHNSoNi • • • • • HOLM • • • • • • • ____ --
(DIEDRICH)···· RILEY······ ____ --
5/29/75
JOINT BOARDS
AMO • • • • • • • • _./ __ .
!DIEDRICti) ••••• BATTIN ••••• __.:t_ _
ANTHONY) ••••.• BURTON ••••• __&__ __
COLLI NS) ••• • • ·BYRNE· • • • • • • _./ __ _
LYONS) ••••. · •• CALLAHAN • • • _.; __ _
~EWING) •••••••• CHAPUT······ _v __ _
DIEDRICH) •• • • ·CLARK· • • • • • • _v __ _
HOMR I GHAUSEN). COX· • • • • • • • • _., __ _
CULVER······ "'
GRIFFIN) •••• ··DAVIS······· fL --
MC INNIS) ••• • ·DOSTAL· • • • • • __;!___21t5g J/;~.
GI BBS) ••••• • • ·DUKE· • • • • • • • _..,, __ _
GARTHE) •••• • • • PIAU~ • • • • • • v
MAC Kr IN) ••••• FOX •••••••• ·-, ---
SONJU •••••••• FRANKIEWICH. ~ ==
EVANS ••••••• GARTHE. • • • • • -
WIEDERJ ••••••• GIBBS ••••••• v ==
GLOCKNER.... v ) -;-NfV IL ~ ••••••• GRAHAM •••••• ___ _ ~ vYJ.7 ) • • • • ••• JAG !ff1Aft; . • . • ./
THOM) ••••••••• KAYWOOD ••••• v ==
FOX) •• ~ ••••••• MAC KAIN.... v
RYCOFF J. ~ ••••• MC INNIS •••• -./---
BLACKMANJ ••••• MC KNEW ••••• -,/-------PERRY....... v
(DIEDRICH). ····RILEY ••••••• ~ ==
RIMA •••••••• ~ --
ROGERS •••••• ~ --
SHARP) •••••••• SALTARELLI •• --:£__ __
DIEDRICH) ••••• SCHMIT •••••• _.,,,_ --
SVALSTADL •••• SCOTT ••••••• _v __ _
GIBBS) ••• • • • • • SH I PLEY • • • • • -"---
MC INNIS)····· STORE·······_./_ --
STANTON)· • • • • • SVALSTAD· • • • _.; __ _
PERE?)........ •••••• ~ -
WOOD)· • • • • • • • ·WARD· • • • • • • • _./ __ _
ARB I so) ....... WE I SHAU PT ••• _.., ---
DUNNE}· • • • • • • ·WINN· • • • • • • • _./ __ _
WARD) ••••••••• WOOD •••••••• _v __ _
GRAHAM) •••• • • • YOUNG ••••• • • _,/ __ _
OTHERS
HARPER v
SYLVESTER _I/_
LEWIS _./_
CLARKE I/
TAYLOR
BROWN -./-
~ I .. ...;:_'."'. ' -I
' \_ • ~ f I J ~ ': /~ I ' """I.,._
WOODRUFF
EWING
(6nr A.J HOHENER -r
HOWARD
11. rv. i HUNT
{I 1 0 KE I TH
I/ --
--KENNEY
Co.., I LYNCH
MADDOX -'-
L r1 ,,,~MART I NSON ./
PIERSALL
lSTEVENS --;-----
MEETING DATE November 12, 1975 T I ~~ E 7 : 30 p . m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11
DISTRICT 1 ~ ~ JOINT BOARDS
RIMA ~,,,~ ~· AMO········~-·
(r CDRICH) ..... BATTI·N·:::: ~ ~ y-DIEDRICr) ••••• BATTIN ••.•• ~ --(~ANS) •••••.•• GARTHE •••• ~ _1__ ~ ANTHONY ······BURTON • • • • • ~ __
(SHARP) •• ~SALTARELLI.~~ ~ COLLINS ······BYRNE······· v --\,. .-. . L VONS) •••••••• CALLAHAN · • · V __
DISTRICT 2 EWING) •••••••• CHAPUT······ ~ --
DIEDRICH) ••••• CLARK· ······~ __
LYONS · • · • · • • ·CALLAHAN· • • V ~ _t__ HOMR I GHAUSEN). COX· •• • • • • • • ~ __
EWING ••.• A ••• CHAPUT ••••• ~ ____li._ _:f__ CULVER· ••••. ~ --
DIEDRICH) ••••• cLARK •••••• ~ ::/___ ...:f___ GRIFFJN) •••••• DAVIS······· Cl-~
GART[iE) • • • • • • • E¥Af4~. • • • • • ~ J..__ .Y.__ MC I NNI s) ..... DOSTAL·· • • • • ~ ~il
THOM) ••.. ·····KAYWOOD •••. ~~~ GIBBS) •••••••• DUKE········~ __
FOX) · • • • · • • • • ·MAC KA IN· • • _J£:... ~ y__ GARTHE) ••••••• E¥Al4S ••••• • • ~
! ) PERRY •••••• ~ --f__ MAC K~IN) ••••• FOX ••••••••. ~ --~~mT~~.:::::~~?~T~·.:::: ~=ft t ~e~~~~·::::::::~~I~~~~~~~: ~ ==
DUNN(:L. • •• ••• WJNN. •• • ••• ~ --111..... :f_ WIEDERJ. •••••• GIBBS ••••••• v --
WARD)··· ······WOOD.·· • • • • ,_,._...._ tV_ ~ GLOCKNER.... v --
GRAHAM) ••••••• YOUNG •••••• ~ ---bl_~ NEVJL), ••••••• GRAHAM •••••• ~ ==
) ••••••• Jc':(t ltr t':tJ. . . . . -DISTRICT 3 THOM) ••••••••• KAYWOOD ••••• ~ ~
(HOMRIGHAUSEN).cox •••••••• ...,.... :t---~ FOX) •• ~·······MAC KAIN •••• ....,..... ==
AMO·....... ~ h _j__ RYCOFF J. ~ ••••• MC INNIS.... v-__
(COLL I NS) •••••• BYRNE. • • • • • V" ~ _:j__ BLACKMANJ ••••• MC KNEW.. • • • ...,..-__
CULVER·. • • • V'" :i--.::J_ PERRY ••.•••• ~ __
GRIFFIN) ••• •• ·DAVIS· ••••• ~ ___fJ::_ 0-.J (DIEDRICH).··· ·RILEY·······~ __
GARTHE)· • • • • • -E¥AP48• • • • • • V"" ]____ r_ RIMA •••••••• ~ __
MAC ~IN) ••••• FOX········ ~ ~ ~ ROGERS •••••• ~ __
SONJU • • • • • • • • FRANKIEWICH ~-%,. ~ SHARP) •••••••• SALTARELLI.. .._.....--__
NEVI~ ········GRAHAM····· ~ tv _L__ DIEDRICH) ••••• SCHMIT •••••• ._...,... --
THOM) ••••••••• KAYWOOD.···~~ _j__ SVALSTAD) ••••• SCOTT ••••••• ~ __
BLACKMAN).···· MC KNEW.·.· V-__1J_ ~ GIBBS) •••••••• SH I PLEY ••• •• v __
DIEDRJCH). ····SCHMIT •••• • ~ ti_ MC INNIS).···· STORE······· ~ --
GIBBS).······· SHIPLEY ••• • ~ J__ STANTON) •••••• SVALSTAD· • • • ~ __
STANTON).·.··. SVALSTAD... v .::J_ PERE?:) •• •••••• . • • · · • • • • • • V---
WOOD) ••••••••• WARD ••••••• ~~+--WOOD) ••••••••• wARD········ ~ --
ARBiso) ••••••• WEISHAUPT. V" ____tL .:.:t__ ARB ISO) •••••• -WEISHAUPT· •• ~ --
--DUNNE)········ WINN········ ~ __ DISTRICT 5 WARD) ••••••••• woOD········--a.£_ ~ ~ } " " GRAHAM)· • • • • • ·YOUNG· • • • • • • ,,,..,,, __ RYCKOFF ······MC INNIS··· ~ -V---~
DIEDRICH). • • • • RI LEY • • • • • ---L-_L__
ROGERS •••• ~ .::t___ .:f--_ OTHERS
DISTRICT 6
(MC INNIS) .•••• STORE • • • • • • v _:f__ L_
(DIEDRICH) ••••• BATTIN • • • • • ~ _bl_ .::/___
RIMA ••••••• ~~ 0....
DISTRICT 7
EVANS • • · • • • • GARTHE • • • • • ~ ::/____ L_ ~ "HONY) · • • • • BURTON····· __&__ ~ --@=-D~DR ICH) • • ·: CLARK • • • • • V'"'" :f.__ __]_
MC INN Is) • • • • DOSTAL • • • • • V--N ...:f._
GLOCKNER • • • _lL_ ~ ~ ~~) • • • • • • .diG\SltflAfJ •• •• V"'""" --1{ _.L_
(SHARP) •• • • • • • SALTARELLI • ~ --1i_ _1_
DISTRICT 11
DI EDRJ CH •••• SCHMIT • . • • • V ___!i_ Y
GIBBS) .....•• DUKE ••••• •• V' N ~
WIEDER) •.•••• GIBBS······ V" ~ +-
DISTRICT 8
5/29/75
HARPER·
SYLVESTER
LEWIS
CLARKE
TAYLOR
BROWN
WOODRUFF
EWING
HOHENER
HOWARD
HUNT
KEITH
KENNEY
LYNCH
MADDOX
MARTINSON
PIERSALL
STEVENS
NOVEMBER 12, 1975 JOINT MTG.
16 (a) Report of the Joint Chairman
MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WILL BE MEETING
NOVEMBER 25TH WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF THE REGIONAL EPA OFFICE
AND THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD TO REVIEW THE CURRENT
STATUS OF THE PREPARATION OF THE DISTRICTS' FACILITIES PLAN AND
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR IMPROVED TREATMENT, AT THAT
TIMEJ WE WILL EXPLORE SOME ALTERNATE PLANS WHICH HAVE BEEN
PRESENTED BY THE STAFF,
THE COMMITTEE'S MAJOR CONCERN IS THAT 62~ MILLION IN GRANT
FUNDS WHICH ARE EARMARKED FOR OUR DISTRICTS FOR IMPROVED TREATMENT
ARE NOT LOST BECAUSE OF DELAYS WHICH COULD RESULT FROM OUR EFFORTS
TO PROVE OUT THE JPL SYSTEM, WE WANT EPA's VIEWS ON SOME POSSIBLE
ALTERNATE APPROACHES TO SPEEDING UP ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION AT THE
TREATMENT WORKS,
THE COMMITTEE WILL BE REPORTING TO THE BOARDS ON' OUR MEETING
WITH STATE AND FEDERAL PEOPLE AS WELL AS OTHER MATTERS AT THE
DECEMBER BOARD MEETING,
#6(c) Report of the General Counsel
Woodruff reported there was no litigation at all to report on. Had a busy month
primarily concerned with contract administration and personnel matters. Will be
receiving reports relative to Orange Park Acres annexation. Regarding item on
Los Alamitos, at last Board meeting Woodruff was authori zed to negotiate and offer
has been accepted. Most of the liability is being absorbed by contractor.
#9 ITEf.f> REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR:
(a) Svalstad stated he felt we shouldn't have to pay ~% of contract price, should
be 6%. Should use two people and get best price. Graham asked if proposals
were solicited. REL advised that JCE did land section of ocean outfall and
we reviewed engineering proposal and felt it was in order with requirements.
Ray read from something and gave rates for average construction costs. Said
prevailing percentage in ASCE consulting industry today may not be in line
with private industry . Only use them as guidelines. Look more at effort
involved.
Chaput said his city has specifications and plans made with each project.
Didn't understand why we feel because engineering firm has put the facility in,
that we are obliged to go back to that engineer.
#9 (e)
119 (j)
REL said that JCE were familiar with hydraulics of the system. A new firm would
be at a disadvantage. Explained that this is an add-on project, not a new project.
Callahan questioned when we go to bid or when we don't go to bid. What is our limit?
REL answered that there hasn't been any guidelines on that. Depends on project, not
the size of the job but the complexity or nature of the project. Saltarelli added
that we should maybe set maximum over which we should have competitve bids.
It was then moved & seconded to receive, file and accept proposal. Motion carried.
FAH then added that the mistnlderstanding or problem here is competitive bidding.
Said we need to outline this area to Directors. Will do so at the earliest
convenience. REL assured Directors we are getting quality work for lowest price.
Saltarelli objected to change order becuase all of these undisclosed utilities
were not shown on plans. Asked if this mistake was on the part of designer and
if so, should go back to them.
Tom Woodruff said that this point has been raised before in his office. Said he
would like to present a report on this subject by the December meeting as to the
question of liability. Situations occur too frequently where cities have inaccurate
utilities plans. Some of it is an honest mistake and some is negligence. Have
been looking into it. The question to go back to our designer or to city or
possibly utility company is of considerable importance.
Saltarelli said he didn't believe it is our fault and shouldn't approve until we
determine liability. REL stated that this was an old street and many of the extras
were abandoned irrigation lines on which there are no records. Contractor had to
remove or dispose of them. Saltarelli added that we maybe should institute legal
action to those responsible at the same time we approve change order. Young agreed
with Saltarelli.
McKnew stated that he thought we had an obligation to the contractor. This is not
his responsibility. He was shown a set of plans and we have an obligation to pay
him. With respect to whether other entities are responsible, concurred that we
should look into it but don't think we should hold up paying the contractor.
Saltarelli withdrew comment. Item was moved and seconded.
Young then asked if we approve this, are we accepting legal liability? Tom said
absolutely not.
Called for the question and several Directors objected.
Chaput question whether responsibility re $7100 is that of utility company and
that we don't have any assurance that we will get anything back. Callahan stated
that he would take this to the City Engineer of Placentia and get some ansers.
Verbally voted. Motion carried.
Kaywood was wondering whether eucalyptus trees could be bypassed. Woodruff said
he met with Mr. Ryan and he said he didn't care of we took trees. Have assured
property owners that in those areas where there are major large trees, contractor
will try to save them. Don't think we would lose too many trees.
Wood asked how we were going to be assured of that since nobody seems to care and
what if they just chop them down? REL advised that alignment of Santa Ana River
Interceptor is through two property owners. Goes along dirt roads and there are
breaks in eucalyptus rows. Both contractors have indicated they would shore
tightly to get by them . Will try to save trees.
-2-
\
Clark asked if we were working with County on this regarding trails. Woodruff
said we are but their time schedule is much <lifferent from ours. TI1ought the
trail that they are proposing is basically the same as ours.
Item was then moved, seconded and carried.
#12(b) Specification E-077
Clark asked if Bird Machine Company was the only company contacted. FAH answered
that they are the manufacturer of equipment that we need parts for--are no other
manufacturers.
#14(a) Specification S-016
Referred to letter in Directors folders from other bidder, Golden
Based on their letter, recommended bids be rejected and authorize
clarify some of these points and come back by next Board meeting.
seconded and carried.
West Fertilizer.
rebid so we can
It was so moved,
Young questioned bid tab and asked that it be written more clearly next time.
"Section 208" Planning
FAH referred to memo in Directors' folders. Have had discussions with LA County
Sanitation Districts and City of LA, as well as talked to Executive Officer of
Regional Board in Riverside and members of the State Board. We invited a couple
people to come down and explain; however, are not here. Read item 4 on memo.
Said State is trying to work with EPA a compromise situation. Is our understanding
that the Regional Administrator of EPA thinks SCAG should be designated planning
agency. Concern of SWRCB is that since SCAG is planning agency with no implementation
powers, that it would be another plan that would eventually wind up on the shelf.
Concerned over money in past plans that have been adopted by SWRCB. Concerned that
this would be junked. Attempting to have some kind of compromise position so that
SCAG would do the layout portion of it and get that information from various entities.
Counties of LA, Orange, San Diego and possibly Ventura. FAH reviewed some of the
other alternatives. State Board does not have any kind of assurances from EPA as
of today on this item No. 4.
Staff recommendation is that we work with EPA, SWRCB, the Counties and other local
entities in developing "208" plan . Wastewater management plans would be subject
to Boards' approval prior to incorporation in plans of State and EPA. Once plan
is adopted in about 3 years, grant ftmds would only be given to those agencies
that are fulfilling the plans in that "208" plan.
Young said she sat on SCAG policy committee during the last couple years. Said
they don't utilize input from respective agencies. Just take information. Asked
if we felt we could take on SCAG and win. FAH said St'ate Board is trying to
work out that we do have input. State Board will put the clause "That any wastewater
management plan will have to be approved by governing body of affected agencies."
Young said other concern is that when SCAG feels they don't have expertise, will
go out and put on experts. Increases our costs and we have plenty of expertise
in our cgencies . Young said she would favor Alternates 2 or 3 over 4.
FAH said there isn't any money released by O!ftt B, so money will only be at 75%.
SCAG will be looking to some of the other entities for other 25%.
Wood said No. 2 does not mention cities in that alternate. In future implementation
of non-point source pollution problem would have to be a part of management
program according to the way the law is written. No. 2 is the way to get your two
cents worth in.
-3-
. ~ 114-
FAH said No. 2 wound up wi~h ome 17 agencies involved in Joint Powers Agreement .
Under No. 3 would be a sep ate plarming agency in each county. Advised that there
is a hearing in LA Monday and in talking with State people, h a ve advised them that
this is a complex thing. Don't believe City of LA can get anything by Monday.
Have a~~d ~t.Q. hold the record OIUm-to.....D~~ember 15th. The Boards may wish to
ma'~ eir recommendation at the December 10th meeting so can get into the record
-\ \. before the 15th.
/\'-'\I \}
~ ~~ Winn suggested they continue this until next meeting and requested Directors to
v ~ . send in their comments so we can study this.
l ) . d )f (·/
Chaput asked what type of comment they were going to make.
Robin Young. Asked for a straw vote on No. 3. -
Said he went along with
Wood referred to testimony she heard that separate county entities are not going
to function properly unless we have people affected by each .
Clark advised that the Board of Supervisors endorsed SCAG for "208". Riley said in
order to be effective, SCAG will have to be the one entity than be concerried with
each of the areas . Wood said "208" really relates to urban areas.
Saltarelli said that it seemed to him that voting power is against us in Orange
County. Suggested that we advise that we are inclined to go along with item 3 or
another alternate that will be determined at December meeting.
McKnew stated they don't have sufficient input to vote on any alternative. Need
a committee to receive input and come back in December.
Graham said a straw vote on how we feel at this present time based on views that
have been presented would indicate general mood.
Duke said he ' thought maybe the Joint Chairman should speak before hearing and give
reasons why we feel No. 3 is best. Saltarelli stated we should have some discussion
on this.
Fox said SCAG is putting pressure on City Managers now.
Perez said he agreed that we need to say that we can do a very good job of
planning and we wish to joint with others in cooperative ? either under 2 or 3.
Mcinnis added this is terribly complex. SAWPA has already done the planning for
the whole area. Only other area is Upper Newport Bay-Santiago Creek area. NIWA
already designated. EPA will never accept. Suggested they take staff's recommendation
and take out "SCAG" and put "sub-regional agency". He then made this in the
fonn of a motion to direct staff to go forward and change wording as directed.
Motion seconded.
Some discussion -clarified substitute motion that it was recommendation No. 4 with
wording changes.
Called for the question on substitute motion. Roll call vote. 1 District approved;
3 Districts disapproved; and 3 Districts tied. Motion failed.
Motion made to take straw vote on alternatives available and that staff be directed
that their current thinking is along these lines. By show of hands.
Verbal vote taken regarding taking a straw vote. Motion carried.
Withdrew the word "straw" in motion to take straw vote.
-4-
Wood stated she objected to procedure on "208".
Battin not ? ---
Graham questioned that last two votes.
Tom Woodruff stated substitute motion failed.
whether there should be a straw ballot cast.
Second motion was to consider
That motion carried by Chair.
Straw vote then taken regarding recommendations 1, 2, 3 and 4.
No. 1 -4 votes
No. 2 -None
No. 3 -16 votes
No. 4 -4 votes
Was stated that motion was to give staff general direction .
MCinnis stated that he wanted to record his total objection to this type of
procedure. Fox agreed.
Woodruff said in his opinion straw vote is no action. Board did t ake some specific
action by disapproving substitute motion. Show of h ands has n o effect legally.
Possible to have show of hands by District.
It was then moved & seconded to move agenda. Motion carried.
McKnew commented he didn't know what was happening. Staff h as no direction.
Svalstad said we should move on with agenda.
#18 (b) Industrial Waste Ordinances
FAH reported that as a result of last month's hearing the staff sent to SWRCB a
letter attempting to clarify some points they had raised in a letter to the Board.
Said today we received by telephone some response to this. They said it was the
best ordinance they had seen yet; however, they cannot go along with the ad valorem
tax as such becuase in their opinion the opinion of GAO says ad valorem tax cannot
be used. Did not oppose adoption of the resolution because of that fact. Want
some assurance that if Congress determines that they are not going to a llow ad valorem
by adoption of HR 95-60, that the Boards would submit to changing the method of
collecting revenue and go to user charge. On heavy metal discharge what we have
submitted is in order. State did say that all in all they would like us to proceed
with adoption of ordinances a nd get on with source-control program.
Some discussion.
Roll call votes.
#37 City of Los Alamitos item
Tom Woodruff reported on background of problem and what has been agreed to.
Moved & seconded to approve payment.
Culver asked if we could delete "inspection fees". REL said contractor will pay
for good portion of this . They will be responsible for i nspection and we will be
responsible for other.
Cox abstained from voting on motion.
Chair then asked for informal indication re straw vote .
-5-
(15) Discussion regarding
"Section 208" planning W.®ld-b e-a-hearing-on-Menday• Nrurember. 17., _
1970, in ho• Anget.... egarding designation. of a "Section 2~8"~
agency for the Southern California area pursuant to provisions
Federal Water Pollution Control Act. ~
~ the BoaTds itt c-n11ne-ctimrt'trerewi t .
The Genera advised that they have ~equested that the hearing
indicated
to the
on December
The General Manager ~:':.eetings to date between the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB),
the-~or ,8.ewerage !gencies in ,Southern Qalifornia , and the Southern
California Association of ~overnments (SCAG)~ 'i:he~n~~~F then
().~0-"' ~ ~,;_ ~
reviewedAseveral .alternatives un~r consideration wHh52 reggsJ to JHi@e Heu
(1) That the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)
be designa ted as the planning agency
(2) A Joint Powers arrangement involving the City of Los Angeles,
Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, Orange County
Sanitation Districts, the Counties of Lo s Angeles, Orange1
\
Riverside, San Bernardino, and possibly Ventura , the
Metropolitan Water District, Santa An a Watershed Proj ect
Authority, etc., with each entity accepting the responsi-
bility of doing the pla nning within their expertise
(3) Four separate planning agencies involving a Joint Powers
arrangement in each of the counties, bringing the
. ~ discipl{nes together
(4) ~ly being explored by the State Water Resources
~~
Control Board with EPA~ be the designation .of SCAG
which would assemble existing land-use plans and obtain
f ~-. h b . 1 . f rom ut1 1ttes agencies t e est service p ans to satis y
existing land-use plans. SCAG would prepare an Environ-
mental Impact Sta tement based on existing plans and
de termine the costs necessary to meet environmental
standards. For each a lternate land-use plan to meet EPA
and State environmental standards, SCAG would prepare the
alternate land-use plans and the utility agencies would
provide SCAG with the utility plans to serve the a lterna t e
land-use plan areas. SCAG would then develop a r ecommended
208 plan which includes all the discip lines. This recommended
208 plan would then be passed to the util.i ty agenci es for
certification by their governing bodies that the wastewater
management portion of the plan for their service a reas is
approved by the governing body of each loca l agency prior to
submittal to the SCAG executive body for approval.
and submittal to the State' and EPA.
EPA has inferred that they would prefer SCAG be designated as the
planning agency. However, consider a ble :LJ has been expressed ~ ~
because SCAG is only a pl anning agency with fl& implementation powers~
t;J>erefgre, uia:ble pl::?ll if adopted mj g~t· R0~ "9e-i111ptement:eti"t'
Mr. Harper recommended:
It is recommended that the Boards direct the staff to work with EPA,
the State, SCAG, the counties and other local entities in the develop-
merit of an areaw:lde "20s ''p1an in accordance with Alternate 4, whereby
SCAG would be designated as the lead agency with a provision that the
wastewater management portions of any plan be approved by the governing
bodies of the local agencies prior to SCAG approval and submittal to
State and Federal authorities.
~ The Board then entered into a lengthy discussion concerning the alternates ';{
and ,the relative advantages and disadvantages of each, as well ai;-the _ J~
=.~t:C:.of SCAG p~art~· i at,ion in waste~ater management planning )and tj( v
ttM 9 ~ 1':i .i.ll.-.. N~~~ ~t~~--fl'--L~J..: ~ft._ ~
fop '. g plkmtbtt~ A m ti on l:'was then introdu~d and s~conded to informally
poll the Directors ~i} ~~ on the several alternatives.<fr~~g-
further discussion, a substitute motion was offered and seconded that
Al ternat&e. 4 be adopted,(substi tuting the
wherever "SCAG" appear,a J( . .
term "sub-regional agency"
(M"tL ~
Following a roll call vote1 the General Counsel reported that tfte ~~
-5tibstitttte motion had failed to pass by virtue of on~strict voting .
1 ~~~
in favor ·~e•ee~ threefa~~cts voting against the moti~~n~three
~stricts with a tie vote. ~vote was then taken on the~m~ion to
informally poll the Directors~~~ p~n on the several alternatives.
The Joint Chairman announced that the 1;L,_t~~d passed and indicated that
the staff's general direction was that Di1ecte~ preferred Alternate 3 .
Directors Mcinnis, Fox, Wood and Battin requested that their objection
to the Boards' proceedings in consideration of the ''Section 208'' matter
be made a matter of record.