HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-08-20COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
August 14, 1975
NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICT NO. 7
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 20, 1975, 7:30 P~M.
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of August 13, 1975,
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange
County, California, will meet in an adjourned regiilar meeting at the
above hour and date.
JWS:rb
TELE PH ON ES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
II
BOARDS -. OF DIRECTORS
\
County S~nitation Districts
of Ora~ge County, California
DISTRICT No. 7
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 20J 1975} 7:30 P.M.
(1) Roll Call
(2) Appointment of Chainnan pro tern, if necessary
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
,IV\\5' ( 3) Appoint~ent of Rita Brown as ~ecretary pro tern . Q
l) _ R .. F~~r~ ~~M~ ~
~ ~£.,-6&fera-l~-C--oun-seJ:'
(6)
Further consideration of Orange Park Association's proposal
for concurrent annexation and bond authorization -Orange
Park Acres (See enclosures)
Other business and communications, if any
(7) Consideration of motion to adjourn <?:...S-l
"The City of Orange has no objection to the conducting
of a study concerning the establishment of sewers in
that a~ea comprising approximately 556 acres known as
the Orange Park Acres area which study would involve no
expense to the City of Orange.
"Neither does the City of Orange even oppose the construction
of sewers in the subject area to serve the residents
thereof to be paid for solely by the residents of
Orange Park Acres provided the following concerns of
the City are satisfied:
"l. The Orange Park Acres Association does not
request connection to any City-owned sewers in the
subject area unless the property owner or owners
requesting connection effect annexation to the
City of Orange.
2. Subject to proper legal acquisition of necessary
easements for such purposes, neither the property
owners nor the Orange Park Acres Association will
object to any future placement of City sewer lines
through the subject area in order for the City of
Orange to serve areas north, east, west and south
of Orange Park Acres.
3. That property owners and the Orange Park Acres
Association express their intention to provide
1.
sewer services only to the subject area surrounded
by the City of Orange city limits on the west,
north, and east and Chapman Avenue on the south,
comprising approximately 556 acres and more
particularly set forth on a map to be placed on
file with the Sanitation District with a copy of
said map to be supplied to the City of Orange.
Because the intention of the Association is to
serve the area known as Orange Park Acres com-
prising approximately 556 acres, the Association
and residents therein should commit themselves,
not only to refrain from attempting to annex new
territory to this sewer assessment district, but
should commit themselves to assist the City of
Orange in promoting-·:annexation ·to the City of the
area south of Chapman -Avenue . as well as· all other·
areas within the sphere of influence.
4. Neither the Board of Supervisors, the Sanitation
District, the Local Agency Formation Commission
nor any other public_:_entity shall utilize the
conduct of the Orange Park Acres sewer study nor
the proceedings for the formation of any assess-
ment district in the Orange Park Acres area com-
prising approximately 556 acres as a reason to
delay or hinder future annexations by the~city of
2.
Orange of territory within the approved area
sphere of influence of that City.
"In summary, gentlemen, the City of Orange does not
object to persons forming districts to serve their own
needs for sewers. However, such legitimate desire of
the residents of the Orange Park Acres area should
never be used as an excuse to hinder or delay the
annexation and development of land to the north, east,
west and south of said area which is within the sphere
of influence of the City of Orange as approved by the
Local Agency Formation Commission.
"Of course, we of the City of Orange are certain that
the residents of Orange Park Acres have no such desire
to impede the annexation of territory to the City of
Orange and the future development of such territory ip
accordance with the Webb Plan which plan these very
same Orange Park Acres residents participated in
creating. Therefore, we assume that these Orange Park
residents will have no hesitancy in affirming their
intention to serve only the 556 acres involved in the
present sewer study proposal.
3.
·I
·MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
~ounty Sanitation Districts
of Oran·ge County, California
JOINT BOARDS
Adjourned Regular Meeting
District No. 7
August 20, 1975
7:30 p.m.
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code ·71 4
540-2910
962-2411
No. S -Eurther Consideration of Orange Park Association's Proposal
for Concurrent Annexation and Bond Authorization -Orange Park Acres,
Approximately 556 Acres.
Pursuant to the Board's instructions the .Staff has prepared a brief report
with a map indicating the area proposed for annexation by the Orange Park Acres
Association.
The Santiago Creek area, better known as Orange Park Acres, is included in
the Mas~er Plan of Trunk Sewer Faci lities for County Sanitation District No. 7
because it is likely to be annexed into the district in the future. This 2,682
acre area drains naturally in a northerly direction from the north shoreline of
the upper Pe t e rs Canyon Reservoir into Sa.nitago Creek. Included in the Santiago
Creek a r ea are the Viila Park Dam and Irvine Par·k recreation areas, which are
expected to contribute sewage flow through small force main systems . The Peters
Canyon are a , which was originally inc luded in the study area, was eliminated from
further analysis in 1969 at the instruction o f the Di s trict Board of Directors.
This action was a result of testimony by Irvine Company representatives before
our Board that .the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) plans to provide sewage
service to the Peters Canyon drainage basin since the l an d is within the IRWD
boundaries.
The a r ea out lined in yellow on the enclosed map is proposed for annexation
by the Orange Park Acres Association. The map also indicate s segments of the
District trunk sewe r system still to be constructed and/or purchased by the
District.
Th·e District is currently cons tructing Reaches 10, 11 a nd 1 2 of the Master
Pla n Sewer and our Master Plan construction schedul e anticipates construction
of Reaches 13, 14, 15 and 16 beginning sometime this fiscal year. The schedule
anticipates construction of Reach 18 in 1977; however, the greater .portion of
th{s area i s not now within Sanitation District No . 7 and may not be constructed
until econom ically feasible.
The City of Orange has cons t ructed a s ewer in Santiago Creek Road which
may be purchase d by the Di strict in the future. TI1is sewe r is designated as
Reach 17 on the attached map. Currently, this sewer serves areas within
District No. 7 which are within the City of Or a nge. Presently, a segment of
Reach 18 extending southerly from the intersection of Meads Avenue and Rand a ll
Street to the Mead annexation south erly of Amapol a is being constructed by the
City of Orange to serve a residential development on the property known as the
Mead Annexation. (District No. 7 Annexation No. 27)
The District's General Counsel has advised that the enclosed pencilled
Orange Park Acres Counsel's schedule, which was handed out at last nights
meeting, appe ars to be quite optimistic. However, Mr. Woodruff has stated
that it correctly sets forth the step-by-step procedures. If any Directors or
Alternates have any questions concerning the outlined procedures, please call
Mr. Woodruff directly. Telephone number: 714-835-6212 ·
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
-2-
\
'
BDLJ/e Ena1neer1na corporation
1501 Ouail Street
P. 0. Box 3030
Newport Beach, California 92663
·Mr. Fred A. Harper, Genera I Manager
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
OF ORANGE COUNTY
Attention Mr. Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
P.O.Box8127
· Founta.in Va I ley, CA 92708 ·
Orange Park Association, Inc. -Engineering Report
and Preliminary Environmental Review Request
c:onsultlnq enq1ncers / archlt~cts
714 I 752 O!~dJ5
August 1, 1975
In accordance with Mr. Lewis' request, we submit our proposal for preparing an engineer's
report in conformanc~ with .Section 4748 of the Hea Ith and Safety Code (Sanitation Dis-
trict Act) and a preliminary environmental review in conformance with the California
Environmental Quality Act.
The area proposed for sewer improvements, as shown on the sketch furnished by the Orange
Park Association, is qpproximately 556 acres. The northwe~tei'ly; northerly, end easterly
boundaries coincide with the city limits of Orange, the southerly boundary is Chapman
Avenue, and the southwesterly boundary for the most part is the westerly property line of
subdivided lots that front on. Orange Park Boulevard.
The engineer's report will set forth the following information in accordance with Sec-
tion 4748:
A. A general description of existing district facilities for sewage collection, treat-
ment, and disposa I.
B. A genera I description of the work proposed to be done to carry out the objectives
of the district.
C. A general plan and general specifications of the work.
D. A genera I description of the property proposed to be acquired or damaged in
• carrying out the work.
E. A map showing the boundaries of the district and in genera I the location of the
work proposed to be done, property taken or damaged, and any other information
useful.to an understanding of the proposed work. ·
F. An estimate of the cost of the proposed work.
. '
County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange Couhty -2-
We propose to prepare the engineer's report for a fee of $4, 180.
August 1, 1975
We wi II prepare an environmental study of the proposed project. This will serve as an
initial study, which is required of the district by the California Environmental Quality
Act to assess the probable impacts of implementing the proposed project and to make a
determination of the need to prepare an environmental impact report (EIR) or a negative
declaration. Other responsible and jurisdictional agencies, such as the Local Agency
Formation Commission of Orange County, wil I be consulted as a part of this in itia I study.
We propose a fee of $965 for the in.itia I sf'udy.
If the in itia I study indicates that an EIR is necessary, such a report wi 11 be prepared for
the district in accordance with the California Enviro.nmental Quality Act. The report
will include a discussion of the local and regional environment, alternatives to the pro-
posed project, an evaluation of environmenta I impacts, and other content requirements
of the Act. Because a comprehensive EIR has a !ready been prepared by the district for
the construction of the Tustin-Orange Sewer, Reaches 10 through 18, much of the data
is· readily available. Our fee for the EIR would be $2, 100.
Included in the fees for the engineer's report, the initial study: and the EIR are repro-
ducible plates of the t-ext, chaits, and maps for the district 1s use in printing the desired
number of copies.
BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPOnTION
(Jx-uuU(J/.-Ac,rJ,U/f,
Conrad Hohener, Jr., PE
Vice President
Id
S T A F F R E P 0 R T
• August 7, 1975
SUBJECT: Sewerage Facilities for Orange Park Acres Area
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 81 2 7
108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71.C) 540-2910
(71.C) 962-2.C 11
The General Counsel has included a report relative to the proposal of the
Orange Park Acres Association for concurrent annexation and bond authorization
for the Orange Park Acres area. The following is a brief staff report of two
possible alternate methods which could provide annexation to the District and
eventual installation of local collection sewers:
ALTERNATE A
Hold an election in the affected area to annex to District ·No. 7 with
the annexation fees collected from the property owners over a five
year period through a special tax assessment on the real property and
improvements. Once the annexation proceedings were complete (approxi-
mately six months to one year) an assessment district or districts
could be formed to install the local collection sewers with District
No. 7 providing the Master Plan Trunk known as Reach 18. The current
annexation fee to District No. 7 is approximately $995 per acre.
While the assessment district costs are somewhat higher because of the
manner in which the financing is handled, the success or failure of
the proceedings is based on a majority protest by property owners
while the proposal of the Orange Park Acres Association will require
a 2/3 voter majority for approval .of bonds for the construction of the
local system and payment of the annexation fees .
. Al TERNATE B
Since this area is ln the zone of influence of the City of Orange, an
election could be held for the residents in the area for concurrent
annexation to District No. 7 and the City of Orange. If this alternative
were successful, the District No. 7 annexation fees would be collected
by a special tax assessment as proposed In Alternate A. It would then
be the responsibility of the City of Orange to work out the local
sewering arrangements with the affected residents and property owners.
FAH:hje . •.
ORANGE PARK ASSOCIATION, INC.
P.O. BOX 2365
ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92669
The Honorable Board of Directors
Sanitation District No. 7 of
Orange County •
Re: Proposal for Concurrent Annexation and
Bond Authorization -Orange Park Acres
Pursuant to the provisions of the District Reorganization Act of 1965 and the
County Sanitation District Act, it is hereby requested that the Board of Directors
of Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County consent to and implement the
following proposal:
1. Petitioners are the owners of more than 5% of the assessed value of land
within the boundaries of Orange Park Acres, shown generally on the attached map.
In order to assure that sanitation facilities may be provided most expeditiously
and with a minimum of cost, it is proposed that such properties be annexed to
District No~ 7 with the concurrent submission to the voters of the area of the
proposition of issuance of bonds of an Improvement District. Such bonds would
be general obligations of the area and would be paid by taxes or revenues,
whichever is more appropriate, without contribution from the remainder of
Sanitation District No. 7.
2. Because of th~ requirements of the Sanitation District Act ( 4748 of the
Health and Safety Code), it is requested that you authorize the District Engineer
to prepare a report concerning the proposed work as the basis for the hearing,
which is a precondition of any construction by the District. Since such a report
should be prepared prior to the actual formal hearings on annexation, the under-
signed propose to guarantee the costs thereof, with the understanding that if
bonds are approved, the proceeds of the bonds will reimburse the costs.
3. It is further requested that a preliminary determination be made by the
District of a maximum maintenance and operation tax which would be submitted to
the voters as a part of any election which may be called on the questions of
annexation and authorization of bonds.
4. It is also further requested, subject to the same guarantee mentioned in
Paragraph 2 hereof, that a preliminary environmental review, pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act, be undertaken. It is our understanding
that the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County would be the Lead
Agency in connection with.the question of annexation. However, in order to
assure that the entire matter be facilitated, it is suggested that a supple-
· mental environmental review be made by the District, encompassing the specific
construction which is proposed to be installed within the area.
.. !".
t
. ;,
ORANGE PARK ASSOCIATION, INC.
P .0. BOX 2365
ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92669
5. Recognizing that the proposal that is here made is complex, we would
request the appointment of special counsel by the District for the purpose· of
preparing the necessary proceedings and assuring their ultimate legality. \For
this pu~pose, we would recommend the appointment of ·such firm as may be determined
appropriate by the District, and we hereby agree to deposit with you such sum of
money as may be necessary to assure payment of appropriate legal fees in the event
the project fails to proceed. · ·
We have -had preliminary discussions, at the recommendation of your staff,
with the law firm of Wilson, Jones, Morton & Lynch, San Mateo, California. That
firm has agreed that. they would undertake the necessary analysis and preparation
of proceedings, together with the issuance of a bond opinion, at a fee to be
negotiated with the District, payable from the proceeds of the bonds. Their fee,
which would be payable in the event of the abandonment of proceedings, or the
failure of the bonds to pass, would be based on an hourly rate of $75.00, and in
an amount of not to exceed $2,500.00.
In order to assure the early presentation of this proposal to the Local
Agency Formation Commission and to the voters, we would appreciate your early
review and response.
e
President, Orange Park Acres Association
. . ,. : .. ~ ~'\..·
~ -' ., ')
:.('
\. \
' ,' I
' ·,
..
. •·
. ~ .
·. ......
·/
PROPOSED
ORANGE PARK ACRES IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT . .
,.· '*) -·~· " .. ' ~ . ' .. '', .-.. :~ ...
•.• I •
.H
. ·.
•
0
• ' •• PnT.:.ij cd -11·7:;
I 11•, r trH{':r, \ .\.~ ~-rn"""' JC. Or~ .. 1-\se R .. .,.k_ Pie-re~ \:i""'"t<. ·l 1.> $;H,, l),.,1 ] 0-rof ,·1"~<:.. Cou .,i<J
!.1 u. ·11. ·~J • .s, ,,, 'I•' I\ 1'/J --_ L ,~ ci -
-<>J'·.T ""l· It, l'l 1C..) (\ ' . '
-.l '/1~15) -··. 1. ... \-\ W \,~.,·Lv., .. Jo_.k.i\ ( C. ----· __ -------· _________ ,. ___ ___;,.
--==-------·j·-:..\~.{ .·\. <1 r-. .se-ff-. ·~-f fJh...~.J~-;rasrJ -i:t IY'I l G."1..~rf1o ~j.t .. < =--fc?~.;dw~af~fU ..iv'!t ... \1::Af_
' i)~-\r,c:\7~d .. "l.>fc.d .+$#~-~ ~) ~ c7ui.sat10.n of~~ kt opc r-11 1,e._'\:_USe. '1' F-q:,s/., ::S _____ _j__ -------
-----~~~' l ,-t,r:J_,"" ~rnw.-.tcrl.JjL-\"i;J __ }"l.c._~~-d ... ~j -~ b..r\cJ<.~tCJ .v-_.c::. ~.?x5 .'C):J ~d_-] k c_co !'sirv J~-~
-----+-' ~.,_f_C-cJ\\CL.\~<-S4?~~~l':>J...·~ff0d~~o~~cJ--01...u-.c.o -nL9f-.?.":1eJ.\cf.: .. lobJ~a~1u·...,._~
___
1
__ bo-rd ~ ........ s-d _.__c ._, ~--.,.-------/ _
4
_{ ;
----------~'5"~ l.'! ___ 3 f~cl -~.5 _...C... ~J. .-p e.: .-l.1a~t't:S_ ' I· -----' -----iq~e.d \,f' ___ 6':)CL.Of-'1""~-'~:L~.c~J _ _vcif~x~< 5 ~ -"-f_t_Lc.l~~c!.o~~~L~~,,j .. __ ·.
_____ __..a ........ ± ....... \e..c.s.LGJ_a-f.Jhc...-Ass~.sseA_\}-".lv.e_of.kw:L. -.. _
-----+-----~:e ~d . _\)e !>en p-\1tl·~1_0.. ~~~-p..r o .f ;'.'l,gJ_~'C~.i-. ,.,~.~t.c.Jn , __________ _
______ rx~~~-Eh'!J1"0.V'l'\"C ~i:e._\__l ""f ?.d .~F-o.:c+ C o 1J·e ~1_:'S r~X:.: '·r -H <' e.f[e.e:.L ~_f-.J(<'..__ __
-------~-n~b-e~;"' u).di"u + =He. <;;f-a_~~.{ tie f_ro~J..seu1er-co"'nr11e-±_t_,,~_-_____ 1
______ _....,,.., .. nJ.wc.-L:i=-f.a:r.Li~ s. ha, ,J.d_b_LlQhe b !:( __ o.:e__u_rde..i:...s.uf'IQ.l-1.S..t.o "LSJ ... f-_~~ r' J"'---'--' __
1
: 7 /?,Jn) 2. LA F C f r{¢-cui1 ue ~.'.~4.c:1 e Ill d. e..f e.r m1V\e ~ su (fc.~i.c y Oc~C?J 1 ~1eii--. __ {~'"= /u:/_13£.J.BJ,-
: wJl,:,
1
1 ~-«-f 11 f 1, ;,_s-;-' ; F c o ~ r f.,_ l-e )
·c
,. I ~~ ·•. .;!-" •• f °' i 7 ' \ ""'"::l:.. ' \_l ... ,. • , a ; r .J , i ,-, , . , . i .. =:,L.(l:;· 0 . ..,""i .L.u-(:..:.:-r.1-·~-::~o..·C_..bo mon:: .. -n .c. n. +D ei ?.._1.s...--~-':-y: .. d ... :c_f.9~-~1.19 "' ~ y ---{1.l..L~----
______ _,JY.;.;,·;.;::·P~-J.:.;:1c.;,:..e;;:..s--~~-~ \i s kd Z ·b ..... ~ 51 po s \.d ~e2.v-1 ("\5 koo .,,, .. J )_aov " Y'V' ~. lc:.d,___ __ ,
--------'-'±o---.G_2~ud:J.., ~ d.1e..fJ~j.Lo~e r ~~C~.9~B_e.t"t2.~J~_tJ_ol+1.~e ~ C .d,es .. w..d ~~ ~;--,
_____ _3_m.:_ks _o:.._~ j-l,c ~cf c.1 1-o fL( \V\v e,,l v e d~------~----
~\icor~~-~r ,~-con dvc.-.\..ed bl( L{\ r:-c ~~L~.?.·./--b~ ___ (o~J,~..l..vd ____ .
"(. Jo _('_ I ---------~L ... LJ p-JuD_d .;:.i_2 . I Lf-(0-~h SlQ_~::.<if.._.mG-\E>~t"t_f.LQ_L::i::.i ~_l._ftE.c. ___ :
----~---~~~-\-~tY:.~e.._b o9.x~!Ot~,'Ll..e.--57 j e rm5.:!_(q ~_jJf!::'.:.':5~_--/ _~6 -""-~ ~-<?,:.__,_dJ S~f 6' S.9-~.~J~~~-~
________ 1&.uil,.011 1 ~ .ssc.~_;:L .aLL.YY.\ .. L\;;~L .. V->-_._ -----·-:
____ tJ~· __ LflfC_Q.d~J~~Jv .11 0 }.,_J}1e:_k.1'."'S _\)e,~·er...ML'C\;-{,o"'..S ;rdL'C<!c.-L'.~_jJ:e_v_t\:!~v:.h_-b.1 ~ ...... __ ~
--°-k-f-'-o_f,r_(:-J.~J 7i_f--;l_~rf-'CQ.Y.~7 . __ W.d~~~~-3_S _9. ?:.'( .S __ e>:f Js..s:_~fq y:: .. o r -~~~ r I ~,j ·---·· ~
------------·--.---·--·-·---------------·--·-··-·-----.
---··----~·-"7\}dn~~--Qo., .. ~--m.~d ·_; n.i 1·C,t ~ r~()c:e~::cL·,._,.s -~ ,_t t_,~-~3 5". d ~y~--~-f Jt1.E.C·. __ ....... _._
_ : _?di~-~-~-,-~ f-t }: __ .(<-1'.l.s _-l9 __ :>_c __ f J_Ji.e __ LA t=" C _.£1~ec . Offr .... n~.:>.y __ (_'}v ~s:r __ .... __ :.
_______ j ___ .:f J_-e__~::)~d . o.f.Svr··<.VG:iu ._o ~ .. tLe,_ Gu )'\_t <[_J 0 _?~i f •• ·-·-·-·-··-·--·--··-·-····--·---.••. ' •.
....... --------~--------q . __ P.'{"o b ,~_-b ) '-(---.Co u id ... Corv-p I '-1--· ~<..> __ 1]_ {.___ J )'\_;.s_J{c,·r'·' rc:.11-.<! 1._:L. bl (.:?'-_~!_<{{'""·~--,
( '1/1/-1 s) ... : ...... ______ .:;> Rl?su lu11 or.. __ d 11 '2.cJ ·, "") rr(~ p2 v,,,.+1 01"' 0 r~ .. , h.. .[ "S' l'\<'f>f) r-<r·r H· ·L?:.:.. r
--·----···-·----!-·-----.. --.. :~~:_r..-:_~5c..d t.L!?" )·2:::_ ~-f-'SL,"':::·!c.J (<);) S1 <-'·~~(Mr:'"'---{ SJ ~i·c , .... ___ ..
I
.. ' . .
.l'1/1~1s). _! ________ b . .O,., -f. '· ~-0 f .. 1Lc _R<"f"Y j,__1{c_ __ Tu:.rd 0 F bu in c,.t_7 "'"'J+ _____ ... --
--_ ! _ se:I ::d-l.c.:i.'l"1"-5.(fvbl1.s b.e d _~_Q h ~c:'., __ :-::._~Y.<J_<:~h ~)_. __ · _
_(;~/~1s)~ e .. A fi.o.:c_\:lc:..~-r.i~r..:}{e,,_R'f o.r±__!.._,.cJop:le.d ___ .-~d---------
! . -
____ t:,J_'D1:::1"~ id_JJo.1 ador>-1 Ld.f?csaiv-/io)-.._fvrMv--ll'I /;,i,;A ,.'...r fl<: A ""~~-..+10...,. _____ _ I r 1 . I "
____
1
_b .... d_eifr6J1~_ihJ~de ... J",_~o-~r ..... ..±lLl,..f-r""e1\\~_[.b 1 s~r1°d:t ),...cur_ ___ _
----:-tie..be..b·L:.hJ __ tstdbh.s \.-.±1-c(ll_;,x1.nwin.h)" .RGtc.1 ~.yd_.) . . .
---'-v---
_____ 1 : §d s. ~He ¢t-l ..:s-=:-q.J.h \: ~ Lc..s .... --r-os.t..L!l.Q.+L'~-~J_~_Lf-.c_L:_6.fC<1-m..a 11.s __ .. __ _
____ ! __ 1'.lcJ\-.1ce_-f_'?. __ ~\l ... l~ndowY\e'f5_~_rlb_!_~ji~-=±€!..L·cLlc>n.!J:q __ be_~b-~~x:cd_.~L_ ___ _
I ' l .
. _ I sk>w.o o-: -tt.~Jc=·J ccrv,,.1.2~ ~s..scss~-\ ran :..+ 1ead~!Jd2'yJ_ befo.re. __
~.25.)~~r'"i"'-5 -he IJ i--o -l le:.s ±be."' 15'°-d 2'-t[-i~J_gx_-:;.~-/t.!.~V>.4L.h-.D.'C~E-__
~~/15) I n" \" (po I
. .
~~[1s_)_B-;-A:l_:HE:.t\~r.{_"-L l~k 1~cl_b.-e_c.o_-:-.-:l.1MJ.d._u pJJ 0 d_cip ),_fJ..'<._])1Jnci 7-..
. : ~.,rJ. m~'i-~f..dM..ci.e._J..1.n.be.~e.dpr'fedtf f r:QM ti(' (2 ttf!.4S~ J _ _l.M.f '(QJ/~rc..f.r,:I:_ .
___ __.._! \J~.s.l:rid,-;d =\ i--c._~1-1mcx~•C!..'l.)_~fd:e-L__hcd.L~!V"-J-b_A_EC ________ 1:
I --~~_,_j\ ___ !::nc!I o.i_Jl-~-f fUJ~.lL\'LD1_, ... uih d y ;-~u r:---pr. o "f J " __ t1" e ~./ o.> c. ___ --~-_ [
_______ · --·~::k.fl'.y)rn;;,,Je.s ::\ k f <CX:C'L~dL~ .. .S--1. e, SO ~ c;i_f:_.-J:-:.J,.tL._'Ce:.71.)J<'_r_<;J. '
~-------v..d:C.'f'L!tt._6-Q.>.,--f2-fk__./a~d.f.4•J"e"'..s.:-"~-~ Q Lf-r~e. l?:;rSl~-,
____ ·_· --~~~~~~~~·~d~1-~~J:F!~~~~~h--.
--~--· · b~1f_n.o_.s\.)klps.f!±~J_:lj)ls1nd .Na~]~_-15o~x.d_nuJd .. ~~j _-]Q _____ .
~J3}Jc,) d~~-~fi'rn"e._"-.t-~f0'fu_v_e.1 t.<J•+l,,,,__:3o _J-=;ys_&f J" c close c} J\e ~x.; j'--:
------------------------------
421 J:, )-1~lf _;z.1y:ed....i i;A, (3 t'.:'_ c/c c±10_~1...i.ov!J_bc.J:--e. lJ._ !t-J ·di .. ~-L-l{'_f_(!_i("}_,,, __ bc.1,;._.s--:
·-! ;:>_i:-1'.\e..i.eA. Or\ Ji~ M
0 W' ttion . ? I='_ A r\ Mp•{10;.._ _,; n<LK~.-F<:K-~-~a.f.w_~_Qr~-U ... e_.4_.~.-_., I --, 1 .. _..,.G . .
_____ i .\ "'-{'c-<1.~_ec~.~-l.l),~l"rid-_"1-_Lb__'J.,f..Rif e..~.-~-o:.n.J:l,,c__}4e_j_hQ,.,,. _ _o( ,..,,J4v ''~'-~\~ ·
; ~ ~ ·-.. t.
-----' ... l)O S..;..-. ---------
------·-----. . ----------
. . : . . .• , fl. .
bb}_~}Q __ ,_~ (\ F C . _ _E J(<?, cu~• v e_qpc.!' t f-rr f.:!" .I .. ~!'_I ~>:f ?.d1~ J A "" /.f .s 1 L of Ji'._·<k ________ . ·
--------\-f((f'S1.\10"-s._w_~ 1c.l_Mvd::-_:\kf.n..J?_-e 6]Jrow·~__k_+ LA-{C. M. l:ess.+i?h ______ ..... .
--------: ... S-4 d •"tP f (Io< .. 4o. rf,f_.__£ /ec.,hoh. I •...... A '(T)i-YPh -ls f ('"/ __ ;:i 1:. /"'sf __ ·---' .
---------,-___ '. f re~ 1> 5 ; -\ , o"5 _ rYd)!.> f. ~ P . [,I"( d _ ~-I e c ~ -~ . § t/ cbp f Y-11.>r.,__ ___________ _
i -_,. __ --..-... ---__ ..,.. ___ _.. ____ . 4--··---· .. -·. -------··-· ... -. -· ··----.. -----------.. --. --------... -.... ···-.. -·--····--·--... ----. ---·-·-· -----.. -· --·--·--------.......... --.... -
' . j
ME ET I NG DATE August 20, 1975 T I ;vi E 7 : 3 0 p . m. DISTRICT S _7 ______ _
BISTR 'ICT 1
RIMA ••.... ------
/1 IEDRICH) ••••• BATTIN • · · · ------
'ttVANS) •••••••• GARTHE • · • • ------
(SHARP) •••••••• SALTARELLI· ------
DISTRICT 2
LYONS ········CALLAHAN··· ------EWING ..••••.• CHAPUT .•• •• _____ _
DIEDRICH) ••••• CLARK .•• ••• _____ _
GART[IE) ••••••• EVANS •• · · · · _____ _
THOM) ••.•••.•• KAYWOOD •. ·. _____ _
FOX) •.•••.•••• MAC KAIN •.• _____ _
PERRY ..•..•
ISVALSTAD) • •••• SCOTT .. · • · • == == ==
PEREZ) •.•••.•• TEMPLE .•• · . _____ _ DUNN~) •••••.•• WINN •. ·····
WARD) .•••••.•• WOOD •.•. · •. _____ _
GRAHAM) ••••••• YOUNG ••.. t • _____ _
DISTRICT 3
(HOMRIGHAUSEN). COX .······· _____ _
AMO ..•...•. _____ _
(COLLINS).··.·. BYRNE ....•. _____ _
CULVER ..... _____ _
GRIFFIN).····· DAVIS······ _____ _
GARTHE). ······EVANS······ _____ _
MAC KAIN).···· FOX········ _____ _
SONJU). · • • ·. ·. FRANKIEWICH _____ _
NEVIt,.). ·······GRAHAM ••••• _____ _
THOM)· • • • • • • · · KAYWOOD. • . . __ __ __
BLACKMAN).···· MC KNEW •..• _____ _
DIEDRJCH) •••.• SCHMIT •••.. _____ _
GIBBS) .••.•••• SHIPLEY ••.. _____ _
STANTON) •••••• SVALSTAD •..
wooD) .••••.••. WARD .•.•... ======
ARB I so) ••••••• WE I SHAU PT .
DISTRICT 5
~RYCKOFFJ· ·····MC INNIS···
DIEDRICH). · • • • RI LEY · • · • ·
ROGERS · · · ·
DISTRICT 6
JOINT BOARD S
AMO········ __ _
(DIEDRICt-J) ••••• BATTI N ····· __ _
[
ANTHONY). •••.• BURTO N · • · • · __ _
COLLI NS). ••••• BYRNE-· · · · · · __ _
LYONS) ••••.... CALLAHAN · · · ___ _
(EWING) •••••••• CHAPUT· • · • · · ___ _
(DIEDRICH) ••••• CLAR K······· ___ _
(HOMR I GHAUSEN). CO X· · • • · • • · · ___ _
CULVER······
GRIFFIN) •••••• DAVIS·······=======
MC INN Is) •.••. DOSTAL·· · · · · ___ _
GIBBS) •••••.•• DUKE···· • • · · ___ _
GARTHE) .....•• EVANS ·······
MAC K~IN) ..••. FO X .•.•..... == ===
SONJU .•.•..•. FRANKIEWICH. ___ _
EVANS ••.••.. GARTHE ••..••
WIEDER5 •..•..• GIBBS ... ····=====
GLOCKNE R •••.
[
NEVIL)t ···· ••• GRAHA M •.•..• ::=:=:=====
TEMPt,.EJ •.•.•.. JACKMAN ••.•. ___ _
THO~) ••••••••• KAYWOOD ..•.• (FOX).·~··· •••• MAC KAIN .•• ·====
(RYCOFFJ •.•••.. MC INNIS ..••
(BLACKMAN) ..•.. MC KNEW ..... --------PERR Y •......
(DIEDRICH) ... ·. RILEY •...•.. =====
RIM A ..•...•. ___ _
ROGERS ...••. ----
(SHARP) .•.••••. SALTARELLI •. ___ _
(DIEDRICH) .•.•. SCHMIT •••..• ___ _
(SVALSTAD) ...... SCOTT ..•...• ___ _
[
GIBBS)····.··. SH I PLEY · • • · · ___ _
MC INN Is)····· STORE······· ___ _
STANTON). • • • · · SVALSTAD· · · · ___ _
PEREZ). • · • · · ··TEMPLE· · · • · · ___ _
WOOD)· · • • · • • · ·WARD· • · · · • · · ___ _
ARB I So).····· ·WEISHAUPT.·· ___ _ DUNN~). • • • · ••. WINN ..•••. • · ___ _
WARD) ..••••... WOOD .••..... ___ _
GRAHAM)· .••.• • YOUNG .. ••.·· ___ _
OTHER S
HAR PER
SYLVESTE R (Mc INN Is) .••.. STORE .•.... --
(DIEDRICH) ••••. BA Tl =~-~-------· e.1-•~----==~--
RV'
-------1' ) DISTRICT 7
}EVANS) •. ·•
ffHONY)
brl EDR IC
(MC IN
MEETING DATE August 20 , 1975 T I i"l E 7 : 3 0 p . m. D I S T RICTS _7 ______ _
BISTR 'ICT 1
RIMA ••.... ------
'1 IEDRICH) ••••• BATTIN···· ------~VANS) •••••••• GARTHE • · • • ------
(SHARP) •••••••• SALTARELLI · ------
DISTRICT 2
LY ONS · • • • • • • ·CALLAHAN· • • ------EWING ••.••••• CHAPUT •.••• _____ _
DIEDRICH) ••••. CLARK .••••• _____ _
GARTt1E) •.••••• EVANS ••. ··. _____ _
THOM) ••..•...• KAYWOOD.· •• _____ _
Fox) ..••••••• -MAC KAIN ..• ------
PERRY ..... .
ISVALSTAD) ••.•. SCOTT ... ···======
PEREZ) ••••.••• TEMPLE .• · · · _____ _
DUNN~) •••• • •• -WINN •. •••··
WARD) ••••••••• WOOD •.•.•.. _____ _
GRAHAM) .•••••• YOUNG •••. , . _____ _
DISTRICT 3
(HOMR IGHAUSEN). CO X··.··· •. _____ _
AMO········ _____ _
(COLLINS).····· BYRNE ....•. _____ _
CULVER .· ... _____ _
(GRIFFIN)······ DAVI S.··· •• _____ _
(GARTHE). ······EVAN S.····. _____ _
MAC KAIN).···· FOX ····· •.• _____ _
S ONJU). · • • · • • • FRANKi EWICH _____ _
NEVJlJ . ·······GRAHAM ...•• _____ _
THOM).········ KA YWOOD •.•. _____ _
BLACKMAN) .•.•• MC KNEW •••. _____ _
DIEDRJCH) .•••• SCHMIT ••••. _____ _
GIBB S ) •••.•••• SHIPLEY .•.. _____ _
STANTON) •••••. SVALSTAD •.• _____ _
WOOD) ••••••••• WARD ••••.•• _____ _
ARB I s o) •.•.••• WE I SHAU PT .
DISTRICT 5
~RYCKOFF ). • · • • · MC INN I s . · ·
DIEDRICH). • · • • RI LEY • · · · ·
ROGER S · · • ·
DI STRICT 6
(MC INNI S ) .•••. STOR E ...... _____ _
(DIED R ICH) •..•. BA TTI N ..... _____ _
R IM A ..•••.. _____ _
DISTRICT 7
>E VAN S ) • · · • · •• GARTHE · •••. ~ i __
iT HONY ) • • • • • BURTON····· ~ --
l1"f EDRICH) • · • • CLAR K • · · · · ~ -(Mc INN I s ) •.•. DO S TAL •.... --v --
GLOC KNER · · · ~ __ (TEM P L ~) .CQ~.JACl<MAN"· ·.. v/ __
(S HA RP ) ....••. O s ALTARELL I . ~___bl __
DI STRICT 11
C""DI EDR I CH ) •.•• SCHMIT .. · •. _____ _
(GI BBS) •.••.•• DU KE ••.. · .• _____ _
(WI EDER ) ••••.. GIBB S ••. •·· _____ _
DISTRICT 8
MITCHELL··· __ ----(J O HNS ON~··· • • HOLM • • • · • · · _____ _
(D IE DRI CH)···· RILEY ······ _____ _
5/29/7 5
JOINT BO ARDS
AMO • · · •. · • .
DIED RICH) ••••• BATTI N •••·• === ====
ANTH ON Y) ••.•.• B UR TON •···· __ _
COLLI NS ) •.•••. BYRN E·· · · · · · ___ _
LYON S) ••.••••. CALLAHA N · · · ___ _
EWING) •..•••.• CHA P UT······ __ _
DIEDRICH) .••. -CLA RK ······· ___ _
HOMR I GHAUSEN ) ·COX·· · · • · · • · ___ _
CULVER······
GRIFFIN) •••.•• DAVI S ·······======
MC INNIS) ••.•• DOSTAL ······
GIBB S) •••••.•• DUKE .·······
GARTHE) ..••.•. EVAN S·· • • • • · ----
MAC Kr IN ) ...•. FO X ...•.•... ----
SONJU •••••.•. FRANKIE WICH .=== ==
EVAN S .•.•..• GARTHE ••....
WIEDE R} ••••.•• GI BBS ..• ····=====
GL OCKN ER •••.
!NEVIL )\···· ••• GRAH AM •.•.. ·====
TEMP~EJ .••.••• JACKMA N •.•••
THOMJ ••••••••. KAYWOO D •.•.. == ==
FOX). ·~·······MAC KAI N •••.
RYCOFFJ .••••.• MC I NN I S •... ----
(BLACKMAN ) ....• MC KNE W •.... ----
PERR Y .•..... ----
(DIEDRICH). ····RILE Y·······====
R IM A •....... ___ _
ROG ERS ....•. ___ _
SHARP). •••••.• SAL TARE LL I.. ___ _
DIEDRICH ) .•••• SCH MIT •.••.• ___ _
SVAL S TAD). ...•• SCOTT ..•.... ___ _
GIB BS )·· •• •·•· SH I PLE Y · • · · · ___ _
MC IN N I s )····· S TO RE······· ___ _
S TANT ON) •. · · • · SVA LS TA D· · · · ___ _
PERE Z)· · • · · • · ·TE MP LE· · · • · · ___ _
WOO D)· · · • · • • · ·WARD· • · • · · · · ___ _
ARBis o) •••.•.. WEI SH AUP T· .. ----DUNN~)········ WIN N.······· ___ _
WARDJ •.•.••••. wo on ........ ___ _
GRAHAM)· ••. • .. YOUN G. · · · · · · ___ _
OTHER S
HAR PER
SYLVE STE R
LE WI S
CLARKE
TAY LOR
BROWN
~~ 'f)~ WOODRUFF
ee~., J! EWI NG no~ ,..,_UVO' HOH ENER
\'! -v UV HO WAR D
HUN T
KEI TH
KENNE Y
LYN CH
MADDO X
MAR T I NSO N
PI ERSA LL
STE VEN S
•.
(5)
-
DISTRICT 7 ADJOURNED MEETING
August 20, 1975
Perez requested that staff briefly outline the proposal. Peggy McElligott pointed
out area on a large hand-drawn map and explained backgrotmd of request and step by
step procedure required for this p!JI\osal.
MUCH DISCUSSION ( {!µ-~ _/
Burton then said that he would make a motion but Chairman Garthe asked that the
General Counsel state what the proper motion would be at this time.
Woodruff stated that if recommendation is to go forward and approve, initial motion
~~ould be somewhat broad and yet authorize specific things:
Approve the initiation of necessary proceedings to annex the described area
to County Sanitation District No. 7 subject to concurrent approval of improvement
financing; and,
/!
Authorize the District's Engineer to prepare the necessary report for consideration
by County Sanitation District No. 7 and the Local Agency Formation Commission,
including an EIR as required by the California Environmental Quality Act; and,
Authorize retention of special legal counsel for purpose of approving
financing and procedures.
All of this is conditioned upon the Orange Park Association, Inc. depositing
,. the sum of $5, 000. 00 cash as payment for costs of these proceedings and as a
guarantee of payment of all other attendant costs related to these proceedings,
i.e., $10,000.00 after LAFC approval and before any election.
This will also be in accordance with their proposed procedure.
If recommendation is to disapprove proceeding, Mr . Woodruff said that motion should
basically be that the staff not be authorized to continue the proceedings and that
no application be made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation.
Burton stated that his motion was the first statements the General Cotmsel made to
proceed with annexation upon acquisition of up-front money and all the other things .
Mr. Woodruff asked if the engineering report included the necessary EIR to go to
LAFC, and was answered, yes, it should include that. Motion should also include
Economic Statement--not just the cost of connection to sewer but also the costs of ~all overlying taxes to City of Orange rather than simple annexation to District 7.
)
Was added that EIS will also include financial impact to surrounding areas as the
people should have understanding of impact on them.
Woodruff mentioned that the staff report estimated costs that might be incurred
in proceeding with this. Some of the costs are reasonably accurate and others are
(
not so accurate. Total project is about $15,000. Request by proponent--and General
\
Manager & General Counsel concurred--was that the sum of $5,000. be deposited up
< front with guarantee filed to pay any additional costs that are incurred with
additional $10,000 and that those costs be paid in advance if LAFC approves and
election is authorized. Burton then state d that is what my motion i s.
Motion SECONDED by Clark .
Perez then asked if they were to presume that Alternates A & B presented at
August 13th meeting were not being considered. Burton answered, yes, Alternates
A & B are not contemplated in the motion.
Perez then stated that for the record, the City of Orange will have to oppose the
motion as presented unless certain conditions were fotmd to be reasonable to include,
as follows: (SEE ATI'ACHED)
MORE DISCUSSION
Called for the question . Roll Call vote. Motion carried 4 :3.
It was requested that a copy of the minutes be sent to the City of Orange, City of
Irvine, and Orange Park Association, c/o Alexander Brodie, 11091 Meads, Orange.
-2-