HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-08-13COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX Bl 27, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE {EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
August 7, 1975
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 13, 1975, 7:30 P.M.
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of Collllty Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, will
be held at the above hour and date.
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
. MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
Regular Meeting
August 13, 1975
7:30 p.m.
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 71 4
540-2910
962-2411
The following is a brief explanation of the more important
non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which'
are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are not attached
to the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the
meeting, but will appear ·in the supplemental agenda available at
the meeting.
Joint Boards
No. 9-a -Consideration of Award of Tilting Disc Check Valves
for Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall Pumping
Station at Plant No. 2, Huntington Beac h; Job No. J-6-lC'.
As a . part of the implementation for additional pumping
facilitie s at the Oc ean Outfal l Booster Station, the staff is
recommending award of this Plant job to Valves and Primer Corp.,
in the amount of $68 ,4 80 .24.
This is the third bid for equipment for the installation of
two additional pumping units. The total of the three equipment
bids awarde d or .received to date are as . follows:
Manufacturer
White Superior Divis ion
of Whit e Motor Corp.
Mccalla Bros.
Valve & Primer Corp.
Unit
Engine Drives
Pumps & Drive Units
Tilting Disc Check
Valves
Contract or
Bid Amount
$ 588,342.62
345,000.00
68,480.24
$1,001,714.86
As previously reported, the Districts received one bid in
Septemb er of last year for the complete installation of these
additional outfall pumping units. Only one bid was received in
the amount of. $1,678, 700. Based upon the staff 's recommendation,
the Boards rejected. a ll bids and instructed the staff to proceed
with the procurement of all equipme nt required and to make the
installation under a labor contract . It is anticipated that
a labor contract will be presented to the Boards for ·their
consideration in September or October.
No. 9-b -Authorization f or Purchase of Electric Fork Lift .
Th e staff is requesting that the Boards authorize the adver -
tising for bids for the purchase of a budgeted 3,000 lb ., electric
fork lift for use in the District s ' new warehouse facility . The
action appearing on the agenda also authorizes award following
public bidding for an amount not to exceed $15 ,000 .
No. 9-c -Sale of Scrap Metal.
~ .
Bids were taken for the sale of accumulated scrap meta l on
August 5th . Included with the agenda material is a bid tabulation
r ecommending sale of the ferrous metal at $33.33 per ton to Orange
County Steel Company and the sale of non-ferrous metals for $.2726/lb .
to Key Metals, Inc., of Santa Ana . The action appearing on the ·
agenda approving the sale of scrap metal to these two firms is
recommend ed .
No .. 9-d -Change Order No. 5 to Job No . Pl-16 (46 MGD Activated
S l udge Plant at Plant No. 1).
Includ ed in the agenda supporting documents is Change Order
No . 5 which we believe to be self-explanatory . The staff recommends
the de scribed additions and deductions which have been approved by
the design engineers . The total effect of this Change Order will
reduce the contract cost by approximately $15 ,000 .
No. 9-e -Change Order No . 2 to Spec ificat ion No . A-074 .
At the June Joint Board meeting , the Directors authorized
payment for additional emission control equipment for two, 6-yard
dump trucks to be purchased from McCoy Ford, Anaheim , which was
r equir ed subsequent to the purchase . Due to a misunderstanding ,
either by personnel at the dealership or the Districts, the author -
ization given by the Board was for a total of $129 . We are now
advised that the equipment increased the price of each truck by
$129 . It is the staff 's recommendation that a second Ch a nge Order
in the amount of $129 be authorized.
No. 9-f -Attendance at Concurrent Meetin s of Water Pollution
Control Federation WPCF and Association of Metropolitan Sewerag e
Agencies (AMSA) in Miami Beach, Florida, October 5-10, 1 975 .
Staff members and Directors have been active in both the
WPCF and AMSi . The conferences and manufacturers' exhibits have
-2-
proved to be ext r emely val uab l e to the Districts . Last year ,
fo u r staff members attended the concurrent meetings of these
two organizations in Denver. The Genera l Manager will be attending
through previous authorization ·to participate in AMSA meetings
as a National Director and officer . It is re·commended that the
Di rectors authorize the Joint Chairman to attend these meetings
since they provide an excellent forum to express our concerns
a nd desires to participating State and EPA officials . •
No . 9-g -Authorizing Agreements with Testing Laboratories
f or 1975-76 In-Place Density Test s to Determine Relative Compaction
of Backfill.
At t he June Board meeting, the Board approved the extension of
an existing agreement between the Districts and the County Highway
Department ·for soils testing services as required in conjunction
with sewer construction projects.· Generally , the staff has found
t he County services satisfactory and acceptable, not only to the
contractor 's requirements, but also to the various cities in
which o u r projects are constructed, but frequently we find that
the job requirements necessitate the utilization of other soils
l a~oratories to expedite recompaction and backfilling operations.
We are requesting that authorization be g iven to retain the
services of the follo w i~g l aboratories :
Southern California Testing Laboratory
Smith-Emery
Twining Laboratories .
These three laboratories have performed successfully in the
past on previous .projects and are presently ret a ined by the Dis -
tricts to perform similar services in conjunct ion with Job No.
Pl-16 (46 MGD Activated Sludge Plant at Reclamation Plant No . 1),
and current in-process pipe testing work . Any authorized work
will be provided at the fees contained in their previous proposals
as noted in the agenda.
No . 9-h -Qlaim of District-s ' Employ ee .
We h a ve received a claim from a District employee in the
amount of $1 ,91.0 for loss of personal photographic equipment which
was taken f:i:-om the. e mployee 's vehicle whi l e parked outside his
residence . The employee has filed a claim with the Districts since
h e uses his personally-owned photographic equipment in th e course
of some of his work assignments . The staff has reviewed this
matter with the General Counsel and the action appearing on the
agenda denying the claim is recommended, as the security of the
employee's personal belongings is not a responsibility of the
Districts .
-3-
District No. 2
No. 9-1 -Addenda Nos. 2 and 3 to Contract No . 2-14-3 .
During the bidding period .for this job, the District r eceived
construction permit requirements from the Flood Control District
and the job requirements for crossing the Atchison, Topeka and
Santa Fe Railway Company right of way . Copies of the se Addenda
are included in the agenda material . a nd it is rec ommended that
they be approved. •
No. 9 -j -Award of Contract No . 2-14-3.
On July 22, bids were received for the construction of the
Santa Ana River Interceptor from La Palma and Grove Streets to
Imp erial Highway and the South Santa Ana River I nterceptor Con-
nector in Imperial Highway. Seven bids were received a n d the
low bidder; John A. Artu kovich Sons, Inc.,. was $721 under the
engineer 's estimate . It is the staff's recommendation that
Resolution No. 75 -1 1 2-2 be approved which authorizes award of the
contract upon receipt of grant approval from the State Water
Resources Control Board.
No. 9-k -Approving Addendum No. 1 to Contract No. 2-14-4.
Add e ndum No . 1 changes the bid date from August 5 to October
19, to allow more time for the contractors to bid on this projec t.
No. 9-1 -Change Order No . 1 -Yorba Li nda Pump Station,
Contract No. 2-15 .
During the construction of the influent sewer to the pumping
station, excavation of existing sewers and utilities in the inter-
section of Associated Road and Yorba Linda Boulevard necessitated
a realignment of the new influent sewer. This reali g nm e nt would
better accommodate the existing flows as well as provide a better
entrance into the pumping station . The contract or has agreed to
perform this work at an additional cost of $3,599 .
It also became apparent du~in g the construction of this
pumping station. that it would be better to construct at this time .,
that portion of the forc e main inclu ding the fittin gs leaving the ·
pumping station to clear the on-si te landscaping and new street .
improvem ents to avoid entering the Univers i ty grounds with a
future contract for the installation of the Yorb a Linda Force Main.
Th e recommended i nsta llation of the 30 " ductile iron force main
from the valve vault including the necessary fittin gs wi ll cost
$4 '901.
Included in th1s Change Order is a deduct modification for
the manhole cover of the wetwell entrance . It was felt that tre
manh ole cover could be modified and stil l provide the access r e -
quired and cut the cost by $1 ,000 . 0
-4-
I '·
" ... ""
Staff recommends acceptance of this Change Order adding $7 ,500
and an extension of t i me of 15 cal endar days. :
Nos. 9-m and n ~ Closeout of Contract No . 2-17 -2.
The Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer from the Carbon
Canyon Channel to Kraemer Boulevard is now complete . Three Change
Orders and a Closeout Agreement are included in the agenda material,
which we believe to be self-explanatory . The combined Change Order
costs for this half million dollar plus project total $1,126, which
we are pleased to say is quite insig nificant for a project of this
size . The contractor was Mark Dakovich, Inc. The staff red.ommends
approval of Agenda Items 9-m and 9 -n. ·
No . 9-o -Completion of Contract No . 2-18.
The action appearing on the agenda authoriz es the filin g of
a Notice of Completion and approves the Final Closeout Agreement
with the contractor, S. S. Zarubica for the completion of the
Carbon Canyon Interceptor. The final contract cost is $1,48 1,327 .04.
No . 9 -p -Cl aim for Personal Injuries of Thomas Smit h .
The District has received a personal injury claim in connection
with the construction ·of the Kraemer Boulevard Interceptor Sewer,
Contract No . 2-16-1 . The action appearing on the agenda denies t h e
claim and refers it to the contractor and the Districts' liability
carrier for appropriate action.
No . 9 -q -Acceptanc e of Easement from the City of Anah e im .
Resolution No . 75 -1 1 5 -2 accepts an easement from the City of
Anaheim for the Atwood Subtrunk Sewer prior to the abandonmen t of
a City street . It is r ecommended that the action authorizing
acc eptance be approved .
District No. 3
No . 9-r -Change Orders Nos . 13 and 14 to Contract No . 3 -18.
After the installation of the interceptor sewer at the inter-
section of Westminster Avenue and Goldenwest Street and ~he tempor ary
restoratio n of the street surface, a City of Westminster water main
ruptured causing complet e failur e of the intersection which neces -
sitate d the immediate restoration of the street surface to accom-
modate traffic in this area . The responsibility for the incident
could not .be easily ident ified as two District cont r actors as
wel l as city forces had ma de excavations in the a r ea just prior
to failure o f the water main . At a meeting wi th Distric ts ' staff ,
including our General Counsel and the City of Westminster staff
and attorney , it was mutually agreed that each age ncy would be
-5-
responsible for their own facilities in the affected area. The
contractor was directed to reconstruct the intersection on a
force-account basis in accordance with the pay provisions of the
standard specifications. All work has been checked by the staff
and the final cost for this work is $8,789.55. ~e recommend
approval of this Change Order.
Change Order No. 14 -During the installation of the 48-i nch
siphon to the Knott Interceptor Sewer at the intersection of
Edwards Avenue and Westminster Avenue, the contractor encountered
considerable amounts of debris and excess concrete which he:was
instructed to remove under force account provisions of the
standard contract. Tncluded in the work which had to be performed
by the contractor was the removal of the concrete encasement on
the 61-inch Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer and the concrete headwall
associated therewith. It is, therefore, recommended that this
Change Order in the amount of $2,338.29 be approved for the work
performed.
No. 9-s -·change Order No. 1 -Westside Relief Interceptor,
Contract No. 3-21-1.
After receipt of bids for the installation of this relief
interceptor. s·ewer to be constructed in Los Alamitos Boulevard
and Katella Avenue, the District's staff has continued to work
with the City of Los Alamitos traffic e n g ineering department and
the City police department to perfect a satisfactory traffic
detour system during construction. The major concern of_ the City
is the accommodation of the. large volumes of traffic on Los
Alamitos Boulevard and Katella Avenue. It became apparent that
the initial traffic requirements as set forth in the specifications
were inadequate to allow normal construction procedures for the
interceptor sewer with a minimum of disruption to the vehicular
traffic.· After several meetings with the City officials, a
revised traffic plan was developed wherein the existing traffic ·
medians, curbs and traffic signals will be removed and reloc ated ,
then reinstalled. to accommodate the temp orary detours required
by the City. The ~ontractor and District staff have deternined
the cost to do thi s work is $11,466 .14. No work has been per-
formed on this Ch ange Order at this time and the staff is hereby
recommend ing approval of this Change Order so that the contractor
may commence construction .
Districts Nos. 5 and 6
No. 9-t and u -PW-041.
The valve installation on Pressure Trunk "B" for Districts
5 and . 6 has been comp l e ted. Change Order No. 1 grants a time
extension of 5 calendar days to the contractor to allow time for
District forces to ·bypass sewage for the construction. It is
recommende d that the Change Order and Res olution No. 75-116 be
approved.
-6-
District No . 5
Nos. 9-v and w -Completion of Contract No. 5-14R-6 .
Wetwell Repair and Remodeling Work at 14th and A Street
Pumping Stations is complete. The staff recommends a time extension
of 13 calendar days to the contractor and the acceptance of the job
as complete .
District No. 7
No. 9-x Request for Annexation .
The District has received a formal request for annexation of
11-plus ·acres in the vicinity of Santiago Canyon Road and Santiago
Creek. It is recommended that the request be referred to the staff
for a report and r ec ommendation to the Board.
No. 9-y -.Acceptance of Grants of Easements.
The former General Counsel has forwarded nine Grants of
Easements for sewer rights of way in connection with Assessment
District No . 7 . It is recommended that the resolutions accepting
these easements be ap~roved so that the documents can be recorded.
No. 9-z -.Reconveyance of Title for Deed of Trust with
Assignment of Rents .
The proponents .of Annexation No. 27 issued a Deed of Trust
to th~ District as se curity to defer certain annexation fees as
a part of an agreement for annexation. The fees h ave now been paid
in full and the security can b e reconveyed to the property owner.
All Districts
No. 14 -Time Sc h edu l e .for Adopting Industrial Waste Ordinance .
Includ e d is a brief staff report outlining in ge neral terms
the proposed changes and a time schedule for the public hearings
and adoption of a revised industrial waste ordinance . We anticipate
that the ordinance can be adopted this calendar year so that it
will become effective January 1, 1976. John Thomas of the Dis-
tricts' s taff will review the proposed changes and discuss the
hearing schedule at Wednesday 's meeting.
No . 1 5 -Revision of Guidelines for Employee Relations.
The Gen e ral Counsel has prepared Resolution No . 75-1 2 7 to
updat~ the Districts' employee relations guidelines. Most of
the changes are minor and eliminate redundant verbage to make
-7-
the guidelines more readable. The most significant revision
clarifies the manner in which the Districts will recognize
employee organizations . The General Counsel will report on
these changes at the meeting.
No. 1 6 -Request for Temporary Discharge.
We are in receipt of a letter from the City of Orange
requesting permission to temporarily discharge groundwater to
the sewer system free of charge. The discharge is the result
of City sewer construction involving dewatering in an area
outside a Sanitation District.
The area in which this sewer is being constructed is con-
templated to be eventually annexed to District No. 7 and, as
stated in the City's lette r, the f ac ility may be purchased by
the District at some futur~ date as a part of the District's
Master Plan of Sewers.
It is necessary to receive authority from all Districts to
accept this type of discharge. To date, the Districts have
autho~iz ed two discharges for waters originating outside the
District's boundaries and , in both cases, the established charges
are $350 .per million gallons . It is estimated that as muc h as
5 million g allons (originally estimated 25 mgd) c ould b e p umped
from the City of Orange project resulting in a f e e of $1750.
Since all Districts receive their proportionate share from
discharges from areas outside the Districts , the staff recommends
that $350 per million gallons be charged in this case to be con-
sistent with the two existing agreeme nts.
All Districts
No. 17 -October Joint Bo a rd Meet ing Dat e s .
It is requested that the Boards consider ho l ding t h e October
Joint Board meeting one week early, on October 1st, rather than
.October 8th. Two Joint Board meetings are being schedu l ed that
month· as the result of the public hearing on the proposed
Industrial Waste Ordinance (October 29th). Movin g the re g ula r
Joint meeting to October 1st would avoid a conflict with con-
current National me ~tings of WPCF and AMSA October 5-10 .
No. 23 -Status Report on Santa Ana River Interceptor .
. We have resolved the matter of State and EPA Grant funding
of t h e final reaches of the Santa Ana River .Interceptor. An
upd ated statu.s report will be g iven Wednesday evening.
-8-
District No. 7
No. 39 -Proposal for Conc urrent Annexation and Sewer Bond
Authorizat i on -Orange Park Acres.
The General Counsel has prepared a memorandum describing
the proc edures required to initiat e the propo sed Orange Park
Acres annexation. In the event the· procedures are approved
by the Board, the prop~nents should depos it $1 5,000 with th e
District prior to und ertaking any further ac tion. The deposit
is for all projected legal and engineering fee s and other
out-of-pocket expens es .
Include d is a brie f staff report of two possible alternat e
methods of ann e xation f or the Orange Park Acres area which the
Board may wish to consider.
-9-
Fred A. Harper
General Mana ger
. ·.
I L>UJ-..L,USI O '-D lI ~E C k OI~S ,..
ll
Co unty Sa niL5tion Di stri cts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
MEETING DATE
AUGUST 13 , 1975 -7:30 P.M.
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll Call
Post Offi ce Bo x 8 127
l 0 8 44 El lis A ve n u e
Founta in Valley, Calif ., 927 08
Telephones :
Area Code 7 l 4
540-2910
962-241 1
AGENDA
\,...1. 1" f'.'\:-;-n ,,,,,.,,.,... AD,v•·•· .. : ... ::. ................. .
c o:.~P p. ~i iL~11.G ~ ..... v. .... .
m es :::r i;r .. v.::. ......... .
RES GU1T . .: .. ~ c::r;TtFH:D.~
LE'ITEHS w;:mEN ...... v. .. _
MINUT ES WHITTEN ... ~···
MI NUTES FILED ....... ~·-·
~3-~A/NI...
(3) Appointment of Chairme n pro tem, if necessary ~S , ~
DISTRICTS 2 & 3 ~ .. \\ ~
(4)
IT EM S ON
SUFPlE .\\E t--:TA L AGE NDA
FILE ·--··---
Ml t;.
L~TTER ........... -
A!C .... TKL R ••••
.. :~··········--
(5 )
(6)
-.._1·• .............. ..
LETTER ............ .,
A/C .... TKLR --
----··-······-·-···-
Consideration of motions to receive and file minute excerpts from
the following cities regarding election of mayor and appointment
of alternate to serve on the Districts' Boards: (*Mayor)
City District Active
Villa Park 2 Don a ld D. Winn
Seal Be a ch 3 Thomas I. McKnew, Jr.*
EACH DIST RICT
Con side r ation of motions approving minutes of th e
a s mail ed :
Di s trict 1 July 9 , 19 75 r egu l ar
Di strict 2 July
District 3 July
Di s trict 5 J uly
Di s t r ict 6 Ju ly
Di s t ri ct 7 July
Di s tri ct 11 Jul y
AL L DISTR ICT S
Repo rts of:
@ Jo i nt Chai rman
~ Ge ne r a l Man ager
~ Gen era l Cotms el
9, 19 75 regular
9, 19 75 r egu l ar
9 , 1975 re gu l ar
9, 197 5 r egu l ar
9 .
' 1975 r e gu l a r
9, 1975 regul ar
Alternate
Robert R. Dunne*
Thomas E . Blackman
f ollowi ng meetings ,
(7) AL L DISTR ICTS
Co n side rati on o f mo t i on to r e ceive and f ile c e rtifi cation o f the
Ge n e r a l Ma nage r that he h a s che cked a ll bills appe a rin g on the a gend a ,
foun d them to be i n order , and that he r e commends authorization for
payme nt
ALL DISTRICTS
(8)
ROLL CALL VOIT .... -
ITEMS ON
SU!'PlEM ENTAl AGE ND A
Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating
and Cap i tal Outlay Revolving Fund accounts payable check registers
for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1 , and authorizing
payment of claims listed on page · "I" ; and a pp r oving accounts
payable check registers for signature of the Chairman of the
respective District, and authorizing payment of said claims listed
on the pages indicated below:
DISTRICT 1 warrants -See page "II"
DISTRICT 2 warrants -See page "II"
DISTRICT 3 warrants -See page "II"
BfS'f'Rf €1fS 3 & H ~a~pe1r:!e fmrd "f!:rrttnt~, if """
DISTRICT S warrants -See page "II"
DISTRICTS S & 6 suspense fund warrants -See page "II"
fl!S'f'RIC'f' 6 warrant~, if an)
DISTRICT 7 warrants -See page ~~"-I_I~I-"~-
DISTRICT 11 wa-r-raHts , if al't)'
(9) ALL DISTRICTS
Roll Ca ll Vote or Cast
u~animo us Ball ot
CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEMS NOS I 9 (A) THROUGH 9 ( z )
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered
as not requiring discussion or further explanation and
unless any particular item is requested to be removed from
the consent calendar by a Director , staff member, or member
of the public in attendance, there will be no separate
discussion of these items. All items on the consent
calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions,
and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on
the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent
calendar sha ll be considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from th e
consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if an y items are to b e d e leted from
the cons ent calendar. d ) ~
Co n s i der a tion o f a c tion t o a pp rove a ll a ge nd a items appe arin g
on th e consent c a l e ndar not s pe cifically r emoved from s ame.
-2-
.. (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
( .. ~FILE~----~···-
~---··------A/C .... TKLR --
'-"' -:l--~----~~L.~-~'
..:.. <~y·c~:':;''!"/)
-v
FILE ····-······--
LETIER ••• -
A/C .... TKlR -
: >. '" (J~~~~Q~~~~~~~
(~LE _• •./ ••
LETIER ··--
A/C .... TKLR -
.... rr. ... o.. .. ~.JL'
FILE ····-··---
LETIER ••• -
A/C .... TKLR -
~ILE ·······---
~TIER •• -
A/C .... TKL7
.... Q ..... o. .. ~--
FILE ·······-··--
LETIER ·---
A/C ...• TKLR ··-
FILE'--·····~
LETTER .J-~:; L ( ~
A/C .... TKLR -
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-111, to receive and file
bid tabulation and reconunendation, and awarding contract
for Tilting Disc Check Valves for the Additional Pumping
Facilities at the Ocean Outfall PtDnping Station, Plant No. 2,
Huntington Beach, California, Job No. J-6-lC, to Valves &
Primer Corporation, in the amount of $68,480.24. See
page "A"
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
advertise for bids and award Specification ~o. A-077, One (1)
3,000 lb. Electric Fork Lift, for an amount not to exceed
$15,000.00, plus tax
(c) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation
and recommendation and award Sale of Scrap Metal, Specifica-
tion No. S-015, for Ferrous Metal to Orange Cotmty Steel for
$33.33 per tori, and for Non-Ferrous Metal to Key Metals, Inc.
for $. 2726 per lb. See page "B"
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the
plans and specifications for 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment
at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-16, authorizing a
deduction of $15,017.64 from the contract with Donovan
Construction Co. of Minnesota for miscellaneous modifications
See page "C"
(e) Consideration of motion authorizing issuance of a corrected
change order in the amount of $301.04 for purchase of Two (2)
6-Yard Dump Trucks, Specification No. A-074, awarded to
McCoy Ford, for mandated emission control equipment required
subsequent to bid submittal (Corrects action on July 9 which
included amol.Dlt for one truck only)
(f) Consideration of motion authorizing the Joint Oiairman to
attend concurrent meetings of the Water Pollution Control
Federation and the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage
Agencies in Miami Beach, Florida, October 5-10, 1975; and
authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and
incidental expenses incurred in connection with attendance
at said meetings
Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to engage the
services of the following laboratories to perform soils
testing on Districts' construction projects in accordance
with the unit or per diem fees contained in their previous
proposals for similar District work as listed below:
Proposal In Connection Board
Firm Of With Project Authorit~
Southern California
Testing Laboratory 8-6-74 Pl-16 8-14-74
Smith-Emerty (formerly
Testing Engineers) 6-3-75 ALL 6-11-75
Twining Laboratories 8-5-74 Pl-16 8-14-74
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
(8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Surge Tower No . 2 Extension at
Treatment Plant No . 2, Job No. J-9-2, granting a time extension
of 36 calendar days to the contract with F. T. Ziebarth Company
due to delays caused by having to coordinate the work with the
Districts ' operations. See page 11 G11
(b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. to the
plans and specifications for 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment
at Reclamation Plant No . 1, Job No. Pl-16, authorizing an
addition of $3,000.00 to the contract with Donovan Construction
Company for purchase of a spare pump impellar. See page "H"
(c) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-132, approving plans
and specifications for Installation of Additional Pumping Facilities
at Foster Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No . J-6-lD, and
authorizing advertising for bids to be received on August 31, 19 76
(d) Consideration of Resolution No. 76 -133, approving plans and
specifications for Threee Gear Reducers for Rehabilitation of
Rothrock Pumping Station, Specification No . E-080, and authorizing
the General Manager to receive bids and award purchase order
contract to the best bidder for an amount not to exceed $50,000 .
See page "I"
(e) Consideration of Standard Reso lution No . 76-134 , approving plans
and specifications for Replace ment of Gas Storage Fa c ilities,
Job No. I-4-lR, and authorizing advertising for bids to be r ecei ved
on August 31, 1976
(f) Consideration of Resolution No . 76-135, to receive and file
bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for
Automatic Gate Op e ratores, Diversion Structure at Rec l amation
Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-052, to Instrumentation & Mechanical
Systems, Inc ., in the amount of $22,688.00. See pages "J"
and "K"
(g)
(h)
(,~, ,. ; ... )
Consideration of motion to r ece ive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation, and awa rding /Purchase of 50 % Caustic Soda Solution,
Speci fication No . P-024, to Stauffer Chemical Company, for the
price of $.10 per pound, fo r a maximum amount not to exceed
$ See page "L"
Consideration of Resolution No . 76-136, ac cepting Brookhurst
Street Improvements in the City of Hunt i ng ton Beach, Job No . P2-8-8,
as complete; authorizin g execution of a Notice of Completion; and
approving Final Clos eout Agreement. See page "M"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
~ \-t-FILE ···········-··-
LETTER··--
A/C .... TKLR ••••
'· ' l FILE ...l...--
LETTER ---
A/C .... TKLR --
FILE--···--
LETTER···-
A/C .... TKLR -·
---·---~--·-.. ······-··-
FILE-·-···-
LETTER·····-
A/C .... TKLR -
ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
(h) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim
submitted by Districts' employee, Bruce J. Taylor, dated
July 8, 1975, in the amotmt of-$J:>:918 Q~ stolen
personal photographic equipmen~ OS~
DISfRICT 2
(i) Consideration of motion approving Addenda Nos. 2 and 3 to
the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor
Sewer (in La Palma Avenue from Grove Street to Imperial
Highway) and South Santa Ana River Interceptor Connector
(in Imperial Highway, from 300' South of Santa Ana Canyon
Road to La Palma Avenue), Reaches 2, 3 & 4, Contract No. 2-14-3
(j) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-112-2, to receive and file
bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for
Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer (in La Palma Avenue from
Grove Street to Imperial Highway) and South Santa Ana River
Interceptor Connector (in Imperial Highway from 300' South
of Santa Ana Canyon Road to La Palma Avenue), Reaches 2, 3 &
4, Contract No. 2-14-3, to John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. in
the amoW'lt of $3,814,462.00; and authorizing the General
Manager to establish effective award date upon receipt of
grant approval from the State Water Resources Control Board.
See pages "D" and "E"
(k) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor
Sewer (from Imperial Highway to Gypsum Canyon Road), Reach 5,
Contract No. 2-14-4
(1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Yorba Linda Pump Station,
Contract No. 2-15, authorizing an addition of $7,500.00 to
the contract with J. Putnam Henck, A Corp., and Henck Pro,
A Joint Venture, for installation of ductile iron force main
and work required for realignment of VCP, and granting a time
extension of 15 calendar days for completion of said work.
See page "F"
(m) Consideration of motion approving the following Change Orders
to the plans and specifications for Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive
Interceptor Sewer, Reach 2, from Carbon Canyon Channel to
Kraemer Boulevard, Contract No. 2-17-2, and authorizing changes
to the contract with Mark Dakovich, Inc. as follows:
(1) No. 1 -Addition of $5,250.00 for miscellaneous
modifications. See page "G"
(2) No. 2 -Deduction of $4,124.00 due to adjustment
of engineer's quantities. See page "H"
(3) No. 3 -Time extension of 21 calendar days for
repair of damage caused by inclement weather.
See page "I"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5)
-4-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4)
FILE ············-···· ' ~ '4 ' -R" ·---I . (._ __ LEITT -t ••• ~ .... ~--l ~
A/C .... TKtR .•••
~!_;'_~~----~·-········
FILE ·····-·-······--~.,,~ ,.,.......
LETTER<':' '•;.. n_ '.o ····-··-'v
A/C .... TKLR ••••
i.::..u·l;'.
G~"':...:.~---
" lfTTER •••• .L •••• _
A!C .... TKlR .•••
( FlLE ,..: ..• ~:·-·-...._ __ .. .--"
LETTER·······-
A/C .... TKLR -
FILE •••••••••••• -
LETTER .• -
A/C .... TKtR -
FILE-·-·--
LETTER-·-
A/C .... Tl<LR -·
................................... .-
--................................... .
DISTRICT 2 (Continued)
(n) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-113-2, accepting
Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer, Reach 2,
from Carbon Canyon Channel to Kraemer Boulevard,
Contract No. 2-17-2, as complete; authorizing execution
of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout
Agreement. See page "J"
(o) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-114-2, accepting
Carbon Canyon Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-18, as
complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion;
and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "K"
(p) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny Claim for
Personal Injuries of 1homas Smith, dated July 2, 1975, in
the amount of $100,000.00, in connection with construction
of Kraemer Boulevard Interceptor Sewer, Palm Drive to
Imperial Highway, Contract No. 2-16-1, and refer to the
Contractor and District's liability insurance carrier for
appropriate action, as recommended by the General Counsel
(q) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-115-2, authorizing
acceptance of Easement Deed from the City of Anaheim for
a permanent easement in connection with the Atwood Sub-Trunk
Sewer, Contract No. 2-7. See page "L"
DISTRICT 3
(r) Consideration of motion approving the following Change Orders
to the plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor,
Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18, and authorizing changes to the
contract with A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. N. M. Saliba Company, A
Joint Venture, as follows:
(1) No. 13 -Addition of $8,789.55 for reconstruction of
intersection of Westminster and Goldenwest
after rupture of City of Westminster water
main. See page "M''
(2) No. 14 -Addition of $2,338.29 for removal of
undisclosed debris. See page "N"
(s) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to
the plans and specifications for Westside Relief Interceptor,
Reaches 25, 26 and Portion of 27, Contract No. 3-21-1,
authorizing an addition of $11,466.14 to the contract with
A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Company, for additional
work involved for traffic control measures requested by
the City of Los Alamitos at the intersection of Los Alamitos
Boulevard and Katella. See page "0"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6)
-5-
.. (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5)
FILE ········-~
LETTER····--
A/C ••.. TKLR -
FILE ·······z:;;~;·-, <:
LETTER'-•.. -:-'L.!. a.
A/C .... TKLR •••• . "' ~,,,,.,,
FILE .............•••••
LETTER ..•.....•..•••
A/C .... TKLR .•.•
-·-··-···············-
--··-··············-·
FILE ·······r.·;···-.
LETTElt" .... .:-~_; ...c
A/C .... TKLR ·-
. FILE •• : •..•..•..••••••
LETTER ·······-···-
A/C ~.TKLR ::::·
FILEO,.--~·-·····
lETTER ···········-·
A/C .... TKLR -
?. . .f..;~.: •. :_.: .. _~-
DISTRICTS 5 & 6
(t) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to
the plans and specifications for Eccentric Plug Valve
Installation, Pressure Tnmk "B", Districts 5 & 6,
Specification No. PW-041, granting a time extension of 5
calendar days to the contract with F. T. Ziebarth Company
in order that the District may coordinate its work for
the purpose of bypassing sewage. See page "P"
(u) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-116, accepting Eccentric
Plug Valve Installation, Pressure Tnmk "B", Districts 5 &
6, Specification No. PW-041, as complete; authorizing
execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final
Closeout Agreement. See page "Q"
DISTRICT 5
(v) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to
the plans and specifications for Wet Well Repair and
Remodeling at 14th Street and "A" Street Pumping Stations,
Contract No. 5-14R-6, granting a time extension of 13
calendar days to the contract with Rewes-Schock, JV, due
to installation of bypass system by District forces. See
(w)
page "R"
Consideration of Resolution No. 75-117-5, accepting Wet
Well Repair and Remodeling at 14th Street and "A" Street
Ptmtping Stations, Contract No. 5-14R-6, as complete;
authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and
approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "S"
DISTRICT 7
(x)
(y)
Consideration of motion to receive and file request of
Donald D. Greek and Charles H. Sandberg for annexation of
approximately 11.165 acres of territory to the District in
the vicinity between Santiago Canyon Road extende4 to a point
westerly of Santiago Creek. See page "T" q. · : ~,~_.> f&;/.\\.lJ
~ .. l\J2:.t.e·.·.<-·c. ' ~lt~i-2'1,··.
Consideration of Standard Resolutions authorizing acceptance
of Grants of Easement for permanent easements in connection with
Assessment District No. 7, at no cost to the District, as follows:
(1) Resolution No. 75-118-7 -From Graham H. & Ruth W. Bell
(2) Resolution No. 75-119-7 -From F. William & Eleanor R.
Bucher
(3) Resolution No. 75-120-7 -From Robert & Janet C. DeRuff
(4) Resolution No. 75-121-7 -From Warren D. & Luanne B.
Hancock
(5) Resolution No. 75-122-7 -From Earl G. Kaltenback, Inc.
(6) Resolution No. 75-123-7 -From Harvey H. Rechsteiner
(7) Resolution No. 75-124-7 -From Gary R. & Judith Rae Siegel
(8) Resolution No. 75-125-7 -From Richard E. & Patricia M. Smith
(9) Resolution No. 75-126-7 -From Harold W. & Sally P. Strickland
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 7)
-6-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 6)
i.c ,_ ................. .
TTER 1 .•. L.-•• -
tc .... TKLR ••••
DISTRICT 7 (Continued)
(z) Consideration of motion authorizing Chairman and Secretary
to execute reconveyance of title for Deed of Trust with
Assignment of Rents issued to the District as security for
note for payment of deferred fees re Annexation No. 27.
(Said note has now been paid in full.)
END OF·CONSENT·CALENDAR
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
-7-
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
l Report of the Executive Collllilittee and consideration of motion to M S receive and file the Connnittee's written report
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive
Committee:
FI LE .... ~ .... ~.t.r
LETIER -·····-····· (a)
A/C .... TKLR ···· M.\ c;
FILE ···--·····--.1h)')
LETT ER ------······· 0
A/C .... TKLR .... fl\ \.s
---······--·-·········r --~ ( c) FILE ~ ... 6 . ,_
LETTER ............. .
A/C .... TKLR ... .
Consideration of motion to receive and file staff and Executive
Committee's comments on interim audit report submitted by
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., Districts' auditors, and
approving Executive Committee's recoIImlendations thereon.
+~.c..
Consideration of motion authorizing staffAto proceed with
planning of Additional Primary Treatment Facilities at
Plant No. 2
Consideration of motion authorizing staff to solicit proposals
for engineering services for Plant No. 2 construction design
as follows:
For Brookhurst Street improvements and realignment of
main entrance roadway at Treatment Plant No. 2 FI LE ~,l~ •.•.•.••
LETT ER -·······-···-
A/C .... TKLR .... ~ From John Carollo Engineers for design of two additional
primary clarifiers at Treatment Plant No. 2 -~
"•••••••••••••u •u•u•••• Mls C3 ) For foul· air treatment at Headworks "C" and centrifuges at
Treatment Plant No . 2
FILE '""'·-·_,._,._._,,,,,
LETTER •..•••••.•.. ,. @ Consideration of motion authorizing the Joint Chairman to appoint
A/c .... TKLR .... a Building Cammi ttee to study the current needs of the Districts
--·-··-····-··----·-·-·· All 'l L re la ti ve to possible enlargement of the Board Room and Completion
--------·······-··-······ f'I / of the unfinished second floor of the administration building for @. additional office space
FILE .~L ~~~~T~\> LE.TTE R;~/'Staff report oi: p7o~osed f~sca~ yea: 1975-7~ bud?ets
A/C/.... ~ (NOTE: Each individual District will consider its budget
···-··-·······-·--····-under a separate agenda item of the respective District.)
FI LE ·-···---···-·(14) ALL DISTRICTS
LETTER ·····---·-iR"\--f Presentation of general _ changes with proposed time schedule re ·adoption
AIC .... TKLR .... of Industrial Waste Ordinance. See page "U"
....... -............. 4(s)'l ALL DISTRICTS ~ --·-··-·-··----~ Consideration of Resolution No. 75-12.7, establishing guidelines for
Roll Call Vote or Cas t employee relations and repealing Resolutions Nos. 69-99 and 71-4, as
Unanimo us Ball ot recoDDDended by the General Cotm.sel . (Copy enclosed with agenda material)
r· ........ ~ ALL DISTRICT S
~~ Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from City of Orange
A'IC •..• TKLR _ dated July 16, 1975, requesting waiver of disposal fees relative to
construction of a portion of Reach 18 of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer,
and denying said request for waiver of disposal fees. See page "V"
-8-
~~
~ ALL DISTRIC TS
Considerati on of motion declaring intent to chan ge the regular
ri\ l) October, 1975, Joint Board meeting to Wednesday, October 1, 1975, l at 7 : 30 p. m.
FILE ···--·"(18) ALL DISTRICTS
~~-Other business and commtmications or supplemental agenda items
A/C •... TKLR ..•• (18-a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny Application
···-···-.JIEMS.ON
SUPP LE MENTAL AGEM.1>
for Leave to Present Late Claim by Malcolm H. Mackey for Claimants,
United Pacific Insurance Co., a corporation, William Conley, and
Shirley Conley, in connection with alleged damages incurred as a
result of floodi ng of a trailer park in the vicinity of Brookhurst
and Garfield, as recommended by the General Cotmsel 1'1lE ···-········--
LITTER ····--·-
A/C __ .TKLR -(18-b) Consideration of motion authorizing temporary increase of $600 in
···················l-TEMS ON the Petty Cash authorization to provide for expense advances for
----~-~~~-~:~-~~TAL AGENDM \ ~ Directors attending the Annual Conference of the California
· Association of Sanitation Agencies in Monterey, August 20-23
(19) DISTRICT 1
WLL CALL VO TE ...... -Roll call vote motion approving 1975-76 fiscal year budget
(20) DISTRICT 1
Other business and commtmications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(21) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn 'i: '/O
(22) DISTRICT 2
ROL L LL VO TE ..• ~-Ro 11 call vote motion approving 19 75-76 fiscal year budget
~ DISTRICT 2 ~ Verbal status report on Santa Ana River Interceptor
(24) DISTRICT 2
Other business and connnunications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(25) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn¥'. t.(S
(26) DISTRICT 3
ROLL Cl\LL vorr .......... -Roll call vote motion approving 1975-76 fiscal year budget
(27) DISTRICT 3
Other business and commtmications or supplemental agenda ite~
~ Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from City of
m 1.1s 0 P Los Alamitos dated August 6, 1975, regarding reimbursement of
SUP PLEM ENTAL AGENDA costs incurred by the City for engineering reviews and inspection
in connection with Contract No. 3-21-1; and authorizing reimbursemen t
of said costs in an amount not to exceed $5,640.00 (Not included in
fl LE ········--. contract specifications) See page "IV''
LETTER •.• -~;~·~.
\jC .... TKLR -Pff , .. ~
-9-
.,
(28) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn 'l ·. ~
(29) DISTRICT 5
Rot~Ll vorr ..... _ Roll call vote motion approving 1975-76 fiscal year budget
(30) DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(31) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn i:~~
(32) DISTRICT 6
ROLL CALt vorr ... .__ Roll call vote motion approving 1975-76 fiscal year budget
(33) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
( 34) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn <6" .. _s--(p
(35) DISTRICT 11
ROLL CALL vorr .... ~~-Roll call vote motion approving 1975-76 fiscal year budget
(36) DISTRICT 11
Other business and com1mmications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(37) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn i · .51
(38) DISTRICT 7
ROLL CALL vorr ...... ~...-Roll call vote motion approving 1975-76 fiscal year budget
(39)
FILE ................. ..
LETTER ••• --
A/C ..•. TKLR ·-
···············-··-NtlS>
···-··--·----....
(40)
(41)
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Orange Park Association's proposal for
concurrent annexation and bond authorization -Orange Park Acres:
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file General Counsel and
staff reports. See pages "W" and "X"
~Consideration of request of Orange Park Association
DISTRICT 7
Other business and comnnmications or supplemental agenda items, if any
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-10-
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County San itation Dist ricts
of Orange County, California
DISTRI CTS 2 & 3
JOINT BOARDS
SUPPLE MENTAL AGENDA ITE MS
AUGUST 13J 1975 -7:30 P.M .
Post Office Box 81 27
10844 Elli s Avenue
Fount a in Valley, Calif., 92708
Telep hones:
Are o Code 71 4
540-29 10
9 62 -2 4 11
AGENDA
(4) Con sider a tion of mo t ions to r eceive and f i l e minute excerpt s from
t he f o llowing cities regarding elect ion of mayor and appoin t ment
of a l terna t e to serve on t he District s' Bo ards: (*Mayor)
District Active Alternat e
Vill a Pa r k 2 Don a ld D. Wi nn Robe r t R. Dun n e*
Seal Beach 3 Thoma s I . McKnew, Jr .* Th omas E. Blackman
AL L DIST RICTS
(8) Consideration of ro ll call vote motion approving Joint Operating
and Cap:ltal Out,lay Revo l vin g Fund accounts payable check registers
for signature of t he Chairman of District No . 1 , and authorizing
payme n t of .claims listed on page "I " ; and approving accounts
payab l e check registers for signature of the Chairman of the
respecti ve District, and authorizing payment of said claims listed
on the pages indicated below:
DI STRICT 1 warrants -See page "I I "
DI STR I CT 2 warrants -See page "I I "
DISTRICT 3 warrants See page "II"
BIS'"P tUffrS 3 & H "ll<'pen "e fm 1d n a x r ar1t!3, if e"y
DISTR I CT 5 warrant s -See page "II"
DI STR I CTS 5 & 6 suspense fund warrants -See page "II"
VISTRie1 6 ~arran t ~, i f e:rt.r
"I I I" DISTR I CT 7 warrants -See page -----
DIS:rRICT 11 ~.·e:ue:Ht'.3, :if a'fty
ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
(18-a)· Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny Application
for Leave to Present Late Claim by Malcolm H. Mackey for Claimants,
United Pacific Insurance Co .~ a corporation, William Conley, and
Shirley Conley, in connection with alleged damages incurred as a
result of flooding of a trailer park in the vicinity of Brookhurst
and Garfield, as recommended by the General Counsel
(18-b) Consideration of motion authorizing temporary increase of $600 in
the Petty Cash authorization to provide for expense advances for
Directors attending the Annual Conference of the California .
Association of Sanitation Agencies in Monterey, August 20-23 '
\
DISTRICT 3
(27) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from City of
Los Alamitos dated August 6, 1975, regarding reimbu rs eme nt of
costs incurred by the City for engineering reviews and inspection
in connection with Contract No. 3-21-1; and authorizing reimbursemen t
of said costs in an amo unt not to exceed $5,640.00 (Not included in
contract specifications) See page "IV"
-2-
WARRANT NO.
2~35 . 26636
26637
26638
26639
26640
26641
26642
26643
26644
26645
26646
26647
'26648
·26649
26650
26651
26652
26653
26654
26655
26656
-~ ·26657
26658
2Fc59
2~)0
26661
26662
26663
. 266,64
26-605
26666
26667
26668
26669
26670
26671
26672
26673
26674
.26675
26676
,., ·26677
I :26-67 8
26679
26680
I ·266.81
26682
2668.3
26h814
2~~5
"l-1"
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
AAA-Fre~ont Bag & Salvage, Sand Bags
Advance Electric, Motor Repair
Air California, Air Fare, Various Meetings
All Bearing Service, Inc., Pump Parts
Allied Supply Company, .Pipe
Almquist Tool & Equipment, Tools
American Backflow Company, Pump Parts
American Chemical Society, Technical Journal
City of Anaheim, Power
Ana~eim Sewer Construction, Lateral Repair
The Anchor Packing Company, Gaskets & Pump Packing
AMSA, Conference Registration
Av-Ox Inc., Valve ·Repair
Balsbaugh Laboratories, Metering Supplies
Bancroft-Whitney Company, Health Code
Bank of America, Bond & Coupon Collection
Banning Battery, Batteries
Barnes & Delaney, Screening Parts
Beach City Dodge, Truck Parts
Beckman Instruments, Instrumentation Supplies
Bell Pipe.& Supply Company, Pipe Supplies
Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair
Benz Engineering, Compressor Parts
Bird Machine, Centrifuge Parts
Black & Decker, Tool Repair & Equipment Parts
Blue Diamond.Materials, Paving Materials
Blue M. Engineering, Controls
Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Magneto Repair
Brenner-Fielder & Assoc.,. Inc., Compressor Parts
C & R Reconditioning Company, Compressor Repair
CS ~ompany, Valves
Cal's Cameras, Photo Supplies & Processing
California Auto Collision, Inc., Truck Repair
CASA, Conference Registration M. O. 6-11-75
Case Power & Equipment, Tractor Repair
Clydes Repair Shop, Caterpillar Repair
Coast Insurance Agency, Liability Insurance Premium
Cliff Coffelt & Sons, Equipment Rentals
College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials
Commercial & CB Communications, Communication Equipment
Co-Nar Equipment Rental, Equipment Rental
Consolidated Electrical Distbrs., Electric Supplies
Consolidated Bolt & Nut Co., Hardware
Constructors Supply, Hardware & Tools
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
Cramer Electronics, Inc., Metering Supplies
Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplies
Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies
Daily Pilot, Bid Notice
C. R. Pavis Supply Company, Hardware
~ohn M. Deck, Equipment Parts
AGENDA ITEM #8
$
AMOUNT
160.48
1,696.09
184.75
134.61
495.40
22.46
273.75·
7.00
75.13
160.00
499.59
150.00
19.38
708.40
23.16
143.66
472.33
1,158.94
8.35
4 39. 81~
69.43
115.50
2,139.37
636.00
29.48
1 11? ~n ~,---~~•.-!'-'
50.14
194. 28.
682.33.
275.00
1,390.15
117.57
146.15
150.00
720.36
899.52
36,305.00
322.50
91.07
178.08
1,068.75
408.48
28.63
545.53
308.43
42.54
40.00
269.73
8.79
183.49
29.81
"1-1"
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
26686
26687
26688
26689
26690
26691
26692
26693
26694
26695
26696
26697
26698
26699
26700
26701
'c267'02
26703
26704
26705 . ·26706
26707
26708
26709
26710
. 26711
. ·26·712
26713
26714
26715
26716
26717
26718 .. 26719
26720
26721
29722
26723
26724
26725
26726
26727
26728
26.729
26730
. ">126-731
26732
26733
26734
26735
26736
26737
26738
"I-2"
Diamond Core Drilling Company, Core .Drilling $
Diamond-Newport Ice Company, IW Sample Supplies
Diana Distributors, Cleaner
A. B. Dick Company, Reproduction Supplies
Dico Company, Generator Parts
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies
Electric Balancing Company, Centrifuge Repair
Electric Machinery Mfg. Company, Pump Parts
Electric Supplies Distributing:, ·Electric Supplies
Enchanter, Ocean Services
Engineers Sales-Service Company, Pump Parts
Enterprise Printing Company, Printing
Filter Supply Company, Filters
Fischer & Porter Company, Pump Parts
Fountain Valley Medical Center, First Aid Supplies
France Products Division, Engine Repair
Freeway Stores,· Calculator Repair
Frost Engineering Service, Pump Parts
City of Fullerton, Water
Garden Grove Lumber & C~ment
Gardner Denver Company, Compressor ·Parts
General Electric Supply, Electrical Supplies
Georgia Pacific Corporation, Chlorine Contract 1-1-75
General Telephone Company of California
Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Grit Removal
Graybar Electric, ~lectrical Supplies ·
Halsted & Hoggan, Inc., Pump Parts
Harrington Industrial, Pipe Supplies
Haskell Engineering & Supply Company~ Valve Parts
Hasty Lawn & Garden, Landscaping Supplies
Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal
Hennig, Inc., Truck Painting
Hoffman's Nason Paint Store, Paint
Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tire Repair
House of Batteries, Batteries
Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies
Rodney Hunt, Pump Parts
City of Huntington Beach, Water
Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Equipment Rental
Information Tran5fer, Inc., Sludge Conference Registration
Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware
International Business Machines, Maintenance Agreement
In~ernational Harvester, Truck Parts
Irvine Ranch Water District, Water
Jensen Instrument Company, Controls
Keenan Pipe &~Supply Company, Pipe Supplies
. Kenron Industrial Supply, Hardware
King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, Bushings & V-Belts
Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies
Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Equipment Repair & Tools
L & N Uniforms Supply Company, Uniform Service
The Lacal Company, Inc., Pump Packing
AGENDA ITEM #8
AMOUNT
225.00
6.90
454.74
47.05~
413.99
358.21
120.00
207.75
46.43
3,000.00
143.10
21.04
348.04
23.29
41.45
400.68
25.00
17.30
6.08
146.28
307.56
281.28
10,454.03
4,068.45
1,620.00
148.97
140.76
25.95
73 .17'-'
21.50
70.00
102.66
73.14
15.l4
90.08
658.74
742.00·
8.97
186.56
285.00
439.79
755.86
21.42
1.75
47.47
3-56. 35
257.40
2,014.84
407.78
482.59
216.94
1,130.41
40.19
"-"
"I-2"
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
26739
26740
~ 41
2~42
26743
26744
26745
26746
26747
26748
26749
26750
26751
26752
26753
"_26_7_54
' 26755
26756
26757
26758
26759
26760
26761
26762
" 267-63
; '26'f64
26765
? -""766
~67
26768
26769
26770
-26771
' 267'72
26773
26774
26775
26776
26777
26778
26779
26780
26781
. 26782
26783
26 11184
26T85
26786
26787
26788
26789
26790
?t:191
~92
"1-3"
Larsen-Hogue, Electrical Supplies $
LA Scientific, Lab Supplies
Judy Lee, Employee Mileage
Los Angeles Technical Bookstore, Technical Manuals
R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., Paving Materials
McCoy Ford Tractor, Tractor Parts
McMaster-Carr Supply Company, Tools
Mahaffey Machine Company, Machining
Marionvich Trawl Company, Trawl Equipment
Mark Company, Raise Manholes
Metropolitan Supply Company, Filters
Mettler Instrument Corporation, Equipment Repair
Mine Safety Appliances Company, Test Supplies
Moore Systems, Electrical Supplies
E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers
Motorola, Inc., Communication Equipment
Musick, Peeler & Garrett, Special Labor Counsel
National Chemsearch, Janitorial Supplies
National Lumber, Building Materials
City of Newport Beach, Water
Nichols Engineering & Research, ACTS-JPL Testing
Noland Paper Company, Paper
Occidental College, Quarterly Trawl
Orange County Boiler, Boiler Parts
Orange County Chemical Company .
Orange County Stamp Company, Rubber Stamps
Orange_ Daily News, Publish Wage Rates
Oreo Block Co., Inc. Building Materials
Osterbauer Compressor Service, Compressor Parts
Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies
Pacific Telephone Company
Parker Supply Company, Filters
Peterson Company~ Equipment Repair
Petroleum Dynamics, Compressor Parts
Tom Ponton, Inc., Pump Parts
Postmaster, Postage for Public Participation in Plant EIS
Productool, Inc., Tools
Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal
Red Valve Company, Valves
Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts
Routh Transportation, Oil Removal
Rucker Company, Incinerator Parts
Ryan Herco, Valves
Santa Ana Blue Print Company, Printing
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motor
Santa Ana Electronics, Electrical Supplies
City of Seal Beach, Water
Seal Black Company, Inc., Paving Materials
Segal Associated, Inc., Blower
Shepherd Machinery· Company, Caterpillar Parts
Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Supplies
·Signal-Flash Company, Barricade Rental
Sims Industrial Supply, Hardware
Fred Sinasek, Employee Mileage
AGENDA ITEM #8
AMOUNT
657.20
134.56
23.10
47.61
705.48
183.50
62.37
40.00
290.00
450.00
149.25
135.00
101.76
233.82
65.46
18.50
545.10
452.88
110.43
60.44
7,366.00
895.48
400.00
126.78
38.53
15.67
674.78
47.17
73.57··
116.28
443.63
76.32
1,004.58
75.09
276.97
3,500.00
163.24'
64.00
204.13
1,524.02
240.44
78.10
369.58
39.64
78.16
53.66
9.68
21.94
121.78
1,098.82
735.36
94.50
172.73
41.79
"I-3"
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
26793
·, 26794
26795
26796
26797
26798
26799
26800
26801
26802
26803
26804
26805
26806
26807
26808
26809
26810
26811
26812
26813
26814
26815
26816
268l7
26818
26819
26820
26821
26822
26823
26824
'-· 268.25
26826
26827
26828
. ?6829
26830
26831
26832
26833
26834
26835
.26836
26837
26H38
'· 26'8 39
26840
"I-4"
Singer Business Machines, Postage Meter Rental $
Southern California Edison Company
South Orange Supply, Pipe Supplies
Southern California Water Company, Water
Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water
Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Standard Concrete Material, Concrete
Standard Oil Company of California, Oil, Gasoline & Diesel
Star-Lite Barricade, Barricade Rental
State Compensation Insurance Fund, Premium Deposit
Sweetland Company, Pump Parts
J. Wayne Sylvester, ~ir. of Finance, Petty Cash Reimb.
T & H Equipment Co., Inc. Equipment Parts
Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage
Taylor-Dunn, Equipment Parts _
Texas Water Utilities Association, Technical Manuals
C. 0. Thompson Petroleum Co., Kerosene
Tiernan's Office Equipment, Office Supplies
Tony's Lock & Safe Service, Hardware
Triangle Steel & Supply Company, Steel
Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts
Union Oil Company of Calif., Gasoline
United Auto Parts, Truck Parts
United Parcel Service, Freight-Out
United Reprographics, Printing .
United States Elevator. Corp., Maintenance Agreement
United States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts
Utilities Supply Company~ Tools
Valley Towing, Towing
VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies
Paul Vukich, Employee Mileage
Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage
John R. Waples, Odor Consultant
Warren & Bailey Co., Inc., Hardware
Waste King Universal, Equipment Maintenance
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts
Western Salt Company, Salt
Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Supplies
Westinghouse Electric Corp., Equipment Parts
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
World Travel Bureau, Air Fare Various Meetings
Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage
John M. Wright, Employee Mileage
Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing
Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Services
Zellar's Cycle, Equipment Parts
Zodiac Paper Company, Blueprint Supplies
J. Wayne Sylvester, Dir. of Finance, Advance to
Directors for Monterey Conference
60.42
55,444.88
12. 04~
4.39
83.11
683.71
105.44
1,175.94
210.20
14,ooo.oo
117.41
741.16
65.19
42. 42.
122.92
75.00
199.28
41.34
35.15
453.26
464.59
20.86
191.61
63.41
179.00
27.00
956.84
10.09
10. 00~
134.18
13.95
22.20
228.70
190.55
111.30
195.85
54.12
985.58
37.00
2,733.50
725.20
23.94
·24. 30
7' 3'75. 83
1,765.08
9.38
329.98
600.00
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING $ 2 0 ~~ ' 8 5 8 . 19
~
AGENDA ITEM #8 "I-4"
,; ~
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
~~23
26624
26625
26626
26627
26628
26629
26630
26631
26632
26633
26E?34
"1-5"
Bud's Equipment, Tire Changer
John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services, ACTS,
P2-20, Facilities Plan
Daily Pilot, Bid Notice A-077 & PW-038
Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16
Eastman, Inc., Office Furniture
Grillias, Pirc, Rosier, Alves, Architectural Services
Pl-16
Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Mgmt. Pl-16
McCoy Ford Tractor, Groundskeeping Equipment
Post Brothers Construction, Used Crawler
The Register, Bid Notice J-6-lC
Southern Calif. Testing Lab, Testing Pl-16
Twining Laboratories, Testing Pl-16
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF
AGENDA ITEM #8
.AMOUNT
$ 762.81
24,961.34
26.69
1,648,167.88
48lt. 31
253.86
12,078.54
821.50
' 33,125.00
94.75
186.30
65.75
$1,721,028.73
$1,923,886.92
"I-5"
DISTRICT NO. 1
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
~
AMOUNT
26597 Costa Mesa County Water District, Refund Permit Overpayment $ 2,055.50
26598
26599
26600
26601
26602
26603
26604
26605
26606
26607
26608
26609
26610
26611
26612
26613
"11-1"
DISTRICT NO. 2
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Bebek Company, Contractor 2-17-1
Chino Basin MWD, Grant Payment 2-14
County of Orange, Compaction Testing 2-16-1 & 2-17-1
Mark Dakovich, Inc., Contractor 2-17-2
J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation, Contractor 2-15
Lowry and Associates, Engineering Services, 2-14-3, 2-14-4,
2-14-5, 2-15, 2-16, 2-17-1 & 2-17-2
George Miller Construction, Contractor 2-16-1
The Register, Bid Notice 2-14-3 & 2-14-4
Southern California Testing Laboratory, Soils Testing 2-15,
and 2-17-2
DISTRICT NO. 3
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
$ 46,794.90
36,830.00
252.79
5,250.00
14,224.94
142,949.70
229,683.46.
197.50
282.18
$ 4 7 6 ' lJ 6 5 • 4 '7 ......,.
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 3-18, 3-20-1, 3-20-2 $
County of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-18 & 3-20-1
2,375.00
582.22
61, 551. 50
2,938.00
66.15
395,879.40
Mike Prlich & Sons, Contractor 3-19
Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 3-20-1 & 3-20-2
Southern California Testing Laboratory, Soils Testing 3-19
Sully-Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 3-20-1
A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Saliba, Contractor 3-18, 3-20-2
3-21-1
AGENDA ITEM #8
352,516.14
$815,908.41
"11-1"
WARRANT NO.
DISTRICT NO .. 5
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
26614 Rewes-Schock, A Joint Venture, Contractor 5-14-R6
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6
SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
26621 Portigal & Hammerton, Legal Fees 5-19
26622 F. T. Ziebarth Company, Contractor PW-041
"I 1-2" AGENDA ITEM #8
AMOUNT
$ 7,200.00
$ 253.00
6,660.00
$ 7,653.00
"Il-2"
DISTRICT NO. }
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
26615 State of California, Processing Fee, Annexation 37
26616
26617
26618
26619
26620
"III"
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 7-6-7, 7-6-8, 7-6-9
County of Orange, Compaction Testing 7-6-6
McGuire Construction, Contractor 7-6-6
Rogers & Davies, Contractor 7-6-7
Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 7-6-7
AGENDA ITEM #8
$
~
AMOUNT
85.00
$ 17,447.00
172.97
88,783.20
74,923.20
312.00
$181,638.37
$181,723.37
"III"
•
MAYOR
Phillip E. Cox
COUNCIL MEMBERS
Barb3ra M. Audley
William S. Brown
Thomas G. Homr1ghausen
Charles E. Sylvia
CITY MANAGER
Michael A. Graziano
.... --• bf
August 6, 1975
Bruce E. Witcher, Senior Engineer
Orange County Sanitation District No. 3
P. 0. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92709
Dear Mr. Witcher:
The City of Los Alamitos has established by Code
(Section 18-22 et al) various classes of Public
Works Permits. In accordance with the City's Code,
a. Class "C" permit shall be issued on this Westside
Relief Sewer Project.
Under the terms of the permit, the City shall collect
for any cost incurred by the City for engineering re-
views and inspection.
Engineering Review time for this
Project is estimated at
Nominal inspection for a 4 month
duration esti~ated at
+ 20%
$ 2,500.00
2,200.00
$ 4,700.00
940.00
$ 5,640.00
A deposit of $5,640.00 must be placed with the issuance
of a Public Works Permit to cover anticipated costs for
the project.
I realize that the project has already begun, so resolution
of this matter should be forthwith, as the contractor is
operating without a permit in the City.
Sincerely,
CITY OF LOS ALAMITµ·
-~· /?~ I I / /f ' //' I , , I/} I u# , ,/Vt/~~
Michael 'A. Grazi~mo /
City Manager
........
J/l)J l\a/e//a A1 1elllil! ·Box 1../1 · Lo.'i Alamitos. Ca/ffiJmia 90120 · teleplumes: lJJ, 43/-353!>. 114 821-H!JlO
"IV" AGENDA ITEM #27 "IV"
a #
l
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
Au~ust 13, 1975 -7:30 P.M .
. '•
RESOLtrrION NO. 75-111
AWARDING JOB NO. J-6-lC
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS.OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT
FOR TILTING DISC CHECK VALVES FOR THE ADDITIONAL
PUMPING FACILITIES AT TI-IE OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING
STATION, PLANT NO. 2, HUNTING10N BEACH,' CALIFORNIA,
JOB NO. J-6-lC
• * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of Cotmty Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recomniendation this day submitted to the
Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer that award of contract be
made to VALVES & PRIMER CORPORATION for TILTING DISC CHECK VALVES FOR THE
ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES AT THE OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION, PLANT NO. 2,
~ HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, JOB NO. J-6-lC, and the bid tabulation and
proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That the contract for said Job No. J-6-lC be awarded to
Valves & Primer Corporation in the total amotn'lt of $68,480.24, in accordance
with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and,
Section 3. Th.at the Chairman and the Secretary of District No. 1 acting
for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor
for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract
documents therefor, in·form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 13, 1975.
"A-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(A) -ALL DISTR~CTS "A-1"
Contract For:
B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N
SHEET
Date July 22, 1975 -11:00 A.M.
TILTING DISC GIECK VALVES FOR THE ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES
AT THE OCEAN OlJfFALL PUMPING STATION. PLANT NO. 2, HUNTINGTON
BEAOI, CALIFORNIA
JOB NO. J-~-lC Engineer's Estimate $72,000.00
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
l. Valves & Primer Corporation
Schaumburg, Illinois
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
"A-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(A) -ALL DISTRICTS'
$68,480.24
"A-2"
B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N
Date: August 5 ,· 19 75
11 :00 a.m.
Contract for:
BIDDER
1. Orange County Steel
1314 Lemon Street
Anaheim
2. Key Metals, Inc.
902 ·E. Santa A.Ila Blvd.
Santa Ana
SALE OF SCRAP METAL
SPECIFICATION NO. S-015
FERROUS
METAL -TON
$33. 33 (a)
30.10
NON-FERROUS
METAL -LB.
$.20
• 2726 (b)
Specifications were also sent to the following firms:
A & M Metal Salvage Co., 2323 W. 5th Street, Santa Ana
Anaheim Fullerton Scrap Iron & Metal, 131 W. Conunercial, Anaheim
Bob Baumgardner, 516~ -35th Street, Newport Beach
Industrial Surplus and Supply, 1680 Superior, Costa Mesa
Rainbow Disposal, P. 0. Box 1026, Huntington Beach
Steverson Brothers, Box 335, Htmtington Beach
Submarine Engineering Associates, 512 -31st Street, Newport Beach
(a) It is recommended that award for Ferrous Metal be made to Orange County Steel,
the highest and best bidder.
(b) It is reconunended that award for Non-Ferrous Metal be made to Key Metals, Inc.,
the highest and best bidder.
,.'{ t. 'j, , ' • i ( ' • • 'I. -/ /,
"-""' Roy Pendergraft
Senior Facilities Supervisor
"B" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) -ALL DISTRICTS "B"
COUNTY SANITATION~DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
•
CHANGE ORDER Page one of two
C. O. NO. 5
------~~~~~~---~--
:ONJRACTOR:oonoyan Construction Co; of Minnesota DATE __ ~~A_u_g_u_st ___ 1~3_.__,;...19_7~5;._.~~---
IOB: 46-MGD Activated Sludge Plant at Reclamatfon Plant No. 1 -Job No. Pl-16
Amount of this Change Order (<JmlX) (DEDUCT) $ 15'017. 64
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
:ontract work are.hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
~eductions from the contract price are hereby approved. \
REFERENCE: Miscellaneous District and Contractor correspondence' attached to file copy
of change order
ADD:
1. Lowering ·valve In Ward Street to level of new paving
2. Installation of additional foundation.bedding mat~rial
under 60" RCP I nfl uen t pipe and cost of rea 1 i gnment of
60 11 RCP near ·the effluent diversion structure ·
3. Revisions and addi~lons to electrical system
4. Addltional manhole on pump station wet well
·s. Additional manhole on f.loor slab of blower building
6. Addltlonpl reinforcing steel to.step•feed meter recesses
for struc~ural soundness of aerator·
7. Positioning change of post-tension cables for digester dome
8. Revisions to clarifier outlet box necessitated by change. In
grace 1 i ne
DEDUCT:
1. Revision in types of joints for the steel suction and
discharge pipe In the return sludge pump station
2. Deletion of painting of walls and ceiling of blower
building basement, thickener gallery and clarifier
pi pe gil 1 le ry
3. Revision of slide g~te detail at existing clarlflers
4. Deletion of additional protective ~eating on ch~nnel
pipe supp.orts and brackets and aerator di ff users be low
roof level
ADD $. 1,370.00
ADD 4,983.50
ADD
ADD
ADD
ADD
ADD
ADD
3,.195.86
1 '500. 00
200.00
1 ,282.00
1,960.00
1 '500. 00.
TOTAL ADD $15,991.36
DEDUCT $10,700.00
DEDUCT 9,609.00
DEDUCT 1,500.00
DEDUCT 9,200.00
TOTAL.DEDUCT $31,009.00
TOTAL DEDUCT THIS CHANGE ORDER 15,017.64
"C-1" AGENDA ITEM·#9(n) -ALL DISTRICTS "C-1"
"-"'
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VAtLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER Page Two of Two
c.o. NO. 5
CONT_RACTOR: Donovan Construction Co. of Minnesota DATE 'August 13' 1975
JOB: 46-MGD Activated Sludge Plant at Reclamation Plant No. 1 -Job No. Pl-16
TIME EXTENSION:
There is no additional time granted for this change order.
Board authorization date:
August 13, 1975
By.._,..
Consulting Engineer
By __________________________________ __
Contractor
Original Co~tract Price $ 29,876,000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ ______ 12~0_1_2.~5_0 __ ~---
This Change ~ (DEDUCT) $ ____ (~15_,_01~7_.6_4~) ____ _
Amended Contract Price $ 29,861,994.86
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By ______ _. _______________________ __
Chief Engineer
"C-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(n} -ALL DISTRICTS "C-2"
"D"
RESOLUTION NO. 75-112-2
APPROVING AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3
A RESOLlITION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AWARD OF SANTA ANA RIVER
INTERCEPTOR SEWER (IN LA PALMA AVENUE FROM GROVE
STREET TO IMPERIAL HIGHWAY) AND SOUTH SANTA ANA
RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONNECTOR (IN IMPERIAL HIGHWAY,
FROM 300' SQUIB OF SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD TO LA PALMA
AVENUE), REACHES 2, 3 & 4, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange
Cotmty, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the
Board of Directors by Lowry & Ass-0ciates, District's Engineers, and concurred
in by the Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH
SONS, INC. for SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER (IN LA PALMA AVENUE FROM
GROVE STREET TO IMPERIAL HIGHWAY). AND SOlITH SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR
CONNECTOR (IN IMPERIAL HIGHWAY, FROM 300' SOUTH OF SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD TO
LA PALMA AVENUE), REACHES 2, 3 & 4, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3, tabulation of bids
and the proposal for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That award of contract to John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. in
the total amount of $3,814,462.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and
the prices contained therein, be approved; and,
Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the effective
award date for said contract upon receipt of grant approval from the State Water
Resources Control Board for said project; and,
Section 4. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor
for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract
documents therefo~; and,
Section S. 'Ibat all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, ~
and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 13, 1975.
AGENDA ITEM #9(J) -DISTRICT 2 II D"
,
BID TABULATION
SHEET F-,ineer's Estimate:
~lt. #1 -$3,815,183.00
Alt. #2 -$3,261,227.00 Date July 22, 1975 -11:00 A.M.
Contract For: S_ANTA mA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, FROM GROVE STREET TO IMPERIAL
HIGiWAY AND SOlITH SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONNECTOR, FROM 300 1
S.O. SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD. TO LA PALMA AVENUE, REACHES 2, 3 & 4
CONTRACT NO'. 2-14-3
CONTRACTOR
1. John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc.
Paramount
2. S. S. Zarubica
·Sun Valley
3. A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. and
N. M. Saliba Company
North Hollywood
..,, 4. Mark Dakovich, Inc. and
Mark Dakovich, an individual
Brea
5. Kordick & Rados, a joint venture
Santa Ana
6. Sully-Miller Contracting Company
Long Beach
7 • Bebek Co. and L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc.
Irvine
8.
9.
10.
11.
ALTERNATE NO. 1 ALTERNATE NO. 2
$3,814,462.00 $3,581,721.00
$3,860,391.74 $3,593,154.08
$4,396,848.00 $4,229,931.00
$4,477,847.00 $4,427,495.00
$4,652,703.00 $4,389,927.00
$4,693,346.00 $4,462,544.00
$4,974,427.00 $4,684,556.00
"E" AGENDA ITEM #9(J) -DISTRICT1 "E"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN. VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
PAGE 1 OF 2.
J. Putnam Henck, A Corp. , and
ONTRACTOR: Henck Pro, A Joint Venture
C.O. NO. 1 ---------------------.-.--0 ATE August 7, 1975
----~--~--------------~---
OB: __________ Y_o_r_b_a __ L1_·n_d_a __ P_um_,_p_S_t_a_t_i_o_n~,_C_o_n_t_r_a_c_t_N_o __ ._2_-_1_s ________________________ ~-----------
Amount of this Change a·rder (ADD) timl1M~l) $ 7,500.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
:ontract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the fol lowing additions to· or
leductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Contractor's letters of May 27, 1975; June 26, 1975;·
and July 14, 1975 and to the District's letters of
June 4, 19 75 and July 29, 19 75.
ADD:
1. · For installation of 30" ductile iron. force main from
the valve vault of the ptllllp station at the curve
~. For.. additional work required for realignment of the
24n VCP
DEDUCT:
1. For change in size of the manhole cover for the wet
well
. ADD
DEDUCT
Extension of Contract Time
The Contractor is hereby granted an extension
for the above work
. TITTAL ADD
TITTAL TIME EXTENSION
"F-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(L) -DISTRICT 2
4,901.00
'•
3, 599·. 00
$8,500.00
~
1!000.00
$1,000.00
$7,500.00
15 Calendar Da~
15 Calendar Days
"'-1 I
"F-1"
· COUNTY SANITATION. DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P·. O. BOX 8127 -. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VAtLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
fHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. 1
PAGE 2 OF 2
J. Putnam Henck, A.Corp., and
:o~ACTOR: Henck Pro. A Joint Venture ------------------------0 ATE August 7, 1975
----------~---------------
JOB: __________ Y~o~r~b~a,___L~in~d~a---.P~umo .... ~S~t~a~t~i~o~n~·~C~o~n~t~r~a~ct~. ~N~o~.__.2_-~15:;.._ ______________________________ ;..._ __
Sununary of Contract Time
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension This Change O_rder
.Total Extension of Contract Time
Revised Co~tract Time ·
Revised Completion Date
..
Board authorization date: August 13, 1_975
By "-""'
Consulting Engineer
By ____________________________________ _
Contractor
Original CoQtract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Change (ADD) (EKE~KI)
Amended Contract Price
Approved:
· September 26, 19 75
360 Calendar Days ·
Sept emb':er 21 , 19 7 5
15 Calendar Days
375 Calendar Days
October 6, 19 75
October 6, 19 75
$ 671, 146.00
$ 0.00
$ 7,500.00
$ 6 7 8, 646 . 00
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
..
By ______ ~------------------------Chief Engineer
"F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9CL) -DISTRICT 2 "F-2"
COUNTY SANIJATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX· 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
. .
PAGE ·1 OF 2
C.O. N0. ____ ~1--~~~~~~----
:0NJRACTOR: Mark Dakovich, Inc. DATE AtJgust 7, 1975
Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer, Reach 2, From Carbon Canyon
iOB: Channel to Kraemer Boulevard, Contract No. 2-17-2
Amount of th is Chang·e Order (ADD) (Dal).~ $ S,250.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the co~tract and/or
:oAt~act work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor,. the following ~dditions to or
Jeductions from the contract prici are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Contractor's letter of July 29, 1975
and District inspection reports.
ADD:
1. For supporting of water fines with a concrete -beam
for Stations 163+25, 166+35, F.H. Crossing 137+6·3, &
174~60 at a pre~iously determined price of $350.00
2.
·per suppo7t
For sewer pipe support at the following stations:
167+40, 174+10, 174+40. 181+42, & 188+00 at a
previously determined price of $350.00 per support
For modifying a manhole base at Station 160+43 so
that a connection shown on the plans could be made
4. For removal and replacement of curb and gutter
from Station 182+75 to 183+05 shown inccrrectly ·
qn the plans and protruding into the construction
area
. 5~
6.
For concrete pads around manholes in the area where
Palm Avenue was removed. $300.00 each for station
186+25 and 188+00
For encasement of the sewer in the vicinity of the
Metropolitan Water Dis.frict line at Station 181+52
16 yards at $50/yard
Taf AL ADD
"G-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(M)(l) -DISTRICT 2
$1,400.00
1,750.00
400.00
300. 00
600.00
800.00
$5,250.00
"G-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VA~LEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. 1
PAGE 2 OF 2
------------~---------co "1"' RAC TOR: Mark Dakovich, Inc. DATE August 7, 1975
Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer, Reach 2, From Carbon Canyon
JOB: Channel to Kraemer Boulevard, Contract No. 2-17-2
No extension of time this ch~nge order
Board authorization date: August 13, 1975
By·...,.
Consulting Engineer
By-------------------------------------Contractor
Original Contract Price $ 539,462.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ _______ 0_._00 ______ ___
This Change (ADD) (~K~~II) $ 5,250.00
----.;.....~~~-----
Amended Contract Price $ 544, 712.00
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By ______________________________ __
Chief Engineer
"G-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(M)(l) DISTRICT 2 · .".G-2"'
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN. VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. N0. ___ 2 ________ ~~--~.-...-
:ONT.RAC TOR: Mark Dakovich, Inc. DATE August 7, 1975
Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer, Reach 2,
JOB: ___________ F_r_o_m __ C_ar_b_o_n~C_a_ny_o_n __ C_h_a_n_n_c_l_t_o~K_r_a_e_m_er~B_o_u_l_c_v_a_rd~,:.--C_o_n_t_r_a_ct~N-o_.~2--_1_7-_2~~~----~~
Amount of this Change Order ~ {DEDUCT) $ 4,124.00
In accordance with co~tract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES
ADD: -
Item Change Est'd-Quantities
NQ. Unit From · To
L. F. 4,700 4, 710
L.F. 444 386
3oard authorization date: August 13, 1975
By
----------------------------------~ Consulting Engineer
By ------------------------------------Contractor
Difference
10 @ 98.00/L.F. 980.00
58 @ 88.00/L.F. 5, 104. 00.
TOfAL DEDUCT $4,124.00
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Ghanges $ S,250.00
This Change (>A~ (DEDUCT) $ 4,124.00
Amended Contract Price $ 540,588.00
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, California
. .
By
----------------------~--------~ Chief Engineer
II H" AGENDA ITEM .#9 (M)_(2) DISTRICT 2 "H" . ..
I
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN. VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. N0. _______ 3 ______________ ~
CONTRACTOR: Mark Dakovich, Inc. DATE August 7, 1975
Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer, Reach 2,
JOB: From Carbon Canyon Channel to Kraemer Boulevard, Contract No. 2-17-2
Amount of this Change o·rder ~ i~l5Ci~l~ $ o.oc
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
.contract work are hereby authorized ind as compensation therefor, the fo11QV./ing additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Extension of Contract Time
The Contractor is hereby ·granted an extension
of time for repair of damage caused by inclement
weather
Summary ·of Contract Time
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
.Time Extension This Change Order
Total Extension of Contract ·Time
Revised Contract Time.
Revised Comp1etion Date
Original
TOI'AL TIME EXTENSION
Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Change ~w ~~~fXgJX«}
Amended Contract Price
Board authorization date: Augu~t 13, 1975 Approved:
$
$
$
$
21 Calendar Days
21 Calendar Days ..
December 26, 1975
180 Calendar Days
JWle 24, 19 75
21 Calendar Days
21 Calendar Days
201 Calendar Days
July 15, 1975
539,462.00
1. 126. 00
0.00
540,588.00
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, Ca 1 i forn i"
By--.,---------------~--~-:---~-------Con s u 1 ting Engineer
By-------------------------~~-------Ch i cf Engineer By ___________________________________ _.__
Contractor
II I II AGENDA ITEM #9(M)(3) -DISTRICT 2' . II I II .
r
RESOLUTION NO. 75-113-2
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-17-2 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF TI1E BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT
NO. 2-17-2 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL
CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Director~ of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County,
California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Mark Dakovich, Inc. has completed the
construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for CARBON CANYON-PALM
DRIVE INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH 2, FROM CARBON CANYON CHANNEL TO KRAEMER BOULEVARD,
CONTRACT NO. 2-17-2, on the 15th of July, 1975; and,
Section 2. That by letter, Lowry & Associates, District's engineers, have
recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with
the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. Tiiat the Chief Engineer of the Districts has concurred in said
engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered
filed; and,
Section 4. That Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer, Reach 2, from
Carbon Canyon Channel to Kraemer Boulevard, Contract No. 2-17-2, is hereby
accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor,
dated the 26th of December, 1974; and,
Section 5. Tilat the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Mark Dakovich, Inc.
setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive
Interceptor Sewer, Reach 2, from Carbon Canyon Channel to Kraemer Bouleva!d,
Contract No. 2-17-2, is hereby approved;and,
"J-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(N) -DISTRICT 2 "J-1" ...
Section 7. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the Board of Directors
are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the
District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a r~gular meeting held August 13, 1975.
AGENDA ITEM #9(N) -DISTRICT 2
II K"
RESOLUTION NO. 75-114-2
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-18 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTPACT
NO. 2-18 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL
CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* ~ * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County,
California,
\
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: <
•
Section 1. 1bat the contractor, S. S. Zarubica, has completed the construction
in accordance with the terms of the contract for CARBON CANYON INTERCEPTOR SEWER,
CONTRACT NO. 2-18, on the 30th of June, 1975; and,
Section 2. That by letter, Lowry & Associates, District's engineers, have
recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with
the terms of the .contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the Districts has concurred in said
engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered
filed; and,
Section 4. That Carbon 'Canyon Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-18, is
hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor,
dated the 27th of June, 1974; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 6. That the Final cioseout Agreement with S. S. Zarubica setting
forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Carbon Canyon Interceptor Sewer,
Contract No. 2-18, is hereby approved; and,
Section 7. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the Board of Directors
are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the
District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 13, 1975.
AGENDA ITEM #9(0) -DISTRICT 2 II K"
"L II
RESOLUTION NO. 75-115-2
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT DEED
FROM CITY OF ANAHEIM
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE
OF EASEMENT DEED FROM CITY OF ANAHEIM IN
CONNECTION WITH CONTRACT NO. 2-7
* * * * * * * * * * * *
1he Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That certain Easement Deed dated June 17, 1975, wherein a
permanent easement in the vicinity of Miraloma Way and Sunshine Way for
sanitary sewer purposes is granted to County Sanitation District No. 2, is
hereby accepted from the City of Anaheim; and,
Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted
is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto
and made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That said easement is granted in connection with the Atwood
Sub-trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-7; and,
Section 4. That said Easement Deed is accepted at no cost to the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 13, 1975.
AGENDA ITEM #9(Q) -DISTRICT 2 "L"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Company, C.O. N0·--1-3--------~
CONTRACTOR: ____ a_Joint Venture DATE ______ A_u_gus __ t_l_3~, __ 1_9_7_S ____ __
JOB: __________ Kn_o_t_t __ I_n_t_e_r_c_ep_t_o_r~,'--R_e_a_c_h_4~,-C_o_n_t_r_a_c_t __ N_o_._3_-_1_8 ____________________________ ___
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) ~ $ 8,789.55
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
contract work are hereby authorized· and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: General Counsel's l~tter of May 14, 1975 and
City of Westminster's letter of May 19, 19 75.
ADO:
For reconstruction of intersection of Westminster
and Goldenwest after the rupture of the City of
Westminster water main at-this location on May io
& 11, 1975, as directed by the District.
TafAL ADD.
Origin~) Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Change (ADD) ~~
Amended Contract Price
Board authorization date: August 13, 1975 Approved:
$8,789.SS
$8,789.SS
$ 4,334,412.00
$ lS0,104.98
$ 8, 789. SS
$ 4,493,306.53
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, California
By ------------------------------------Consulting Engineer
By------------------~--~---------By -----------------------------------Ch i e f Engineer.
Contractor
"M" AGENDA ITEM #9(R)(l) -DISTRICT 3. "M"
r
COUNTX SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 81~7 -· 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
•
~ A. G. Tutor CQ., Inc. & N. M. Saliba· Company, C.O. NO. 14 ------------------------CONTRACTOR: a joint venture 0 ATE August 7, 1975
--------------------------~
JOB: __________ K_n_o_t_t __ In_t_e_r_c_e_p_t_o_r~, __ Re_a_c_h __ 4_, __ ·c_o_n_tr_a_c_t __ N_o_. __ 3_-_1_8 ______________________ ~------------
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (ti~titj~~) $ 2, 338. 29
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/er
contract work are hereby authorized •nd as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Inspection Reports from June 16 to J\IDe 27, 1975
and Contractor's letters to District dated June 17,
1975 and June 27, 1975.
ADD:
1.
...
'
For the removal of an abandoned 30" CMP, concrete
headwall,, and other debris in the intersection of
Edwards and Westminster in order to construct the 48"
siphon at that location
For the removal c.f concrete encasement on the Districts
existing 60n Millcr~Holder Trunk Se\ver in order ·to
place portions of the 48" siphon at Edwards and
Westminster
TOTAL 0
ADD
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Change (ADD) ~
Amended Contract Price
Board authorization date: August 13,, 1975 Approved:
1,284.72
1,,053.57
$2,338.29
$ 4,334,412.00
$ 158,894.53·
$ 2,,338.29
$ 4,,495,644.82
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, Ca 1 i forn i <1
By-------------------------------------Consulting Engineer
By ___________________________________ __ By---------------------------~-----Ch i e f Engineer
Contractor
"N" AGENDA ITEM #9(R)(2) DISTRICT 3' "NII
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -.10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. &
:ONTRACTOR: N. M. Saliba Company
C.O. N0. _____ 1~~---------~~
DATE August 7, 1975
-----------~------------------
JOB: Westside Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, .26 and Portion of 27, Contract No. 3-21-1
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) ~ $ 11,466.14
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
contract work are hereby authorized· C4nd as compensation therefo.r, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: City of Los Alamitos_ request and letter
from Contractor dated July 30, 1975.
ADD:.
At the intersection of Los Alamitos Blvd. and Katella
.fer· the removal and replacement of median curbs and
medians, temporary construction of detours in the
median area, the removal of all temporary work,
modification of signals and the additional electrical
work involved and the restoration of the intersection
to its original condition as requested by the City.
Work is to be perfonned in order to minimize the effect
of.construction in this area and to insure a near
normal flow of traffic. This work is over and above·
detour work specified urider this contract. Plans for
this work are to be prepared by the City
TOI'AL ADD
Origin~l Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Change (ADD) (~
Amended Contract Price
Board authorization date: August 13, 1975 Approved:
..
$11,466.14 •.
$11,466.14
$ 1,416,.448.00
$ ____ o_._o_o __ _
$ 11,466.14 ______ .__ ________ ~
$ 1, 427, 914.14 ___ _
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, Californi2
By
-------------------------.~--~------Cons u 1 ting Engineer
By ------------------------------------
By
--------------------------~----__... Chief Engineer.
Contractor
"O" AGENDA ITEM #9(s) DISTRICT. 3 ." O"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX s1i7 -· 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAJN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
• C.b. N0. ___ 1 __________________ __
DNnfACTOR: F. T. Ziebarth Company August 7, 1975
--------~~~------~-----------------------Eccentric Plug Valve Installation, Pressure Trunk "B"
DB: ____________ n1_·s_t_r_i~c_t~s.._..S._&..__.6~.__,Sp~c~c~1~·f~i~c=a~t~i~o~n.__N~o~·--P\~~--~0~4~1~----------------~------------~------
Amount of this Change Order ~ ~ $ o. 00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or·
ontract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
eductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Extension of Contract Time
Tile Contractor is hereby granted an extension of
time in ·order that the District may coordinate
the activities of its crew for the purpose of
byp~sing ·sewage
Suinmary of Contra~t Time
Original Contract Date
~ Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension This Change Order
Total Extension of Contract Time·
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
oard authorization date: August 13, 1975
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Change ~tAA ~~
Amended Contract Price
App roved:
5 Calendar Days
5 Calendar Days
May 29, 1975
30 Calendar Days
June 28,, 1975
5 Calendar Days·
5 Calendar Days
35 Calendar Days
July 3, 1975
$ 7, 400. 00
$ ____ o_._o_o~---~---
$ o. 00
--------~----~---
$ 7,400.00
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, California
y_
Consulting Engineer
y _________________________________ ~---. By--------------------~~~~~~---Ch i e f Engineer
Contractor
II P" . AGENDA ITEM #9(r) -DISTRICTS s· & 6 II P"
"Q"
RESOLUTION NO. 75-116
ACCEPTING SPECIFICATION NO. PW-041 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING ECCENTRIC
PLUG VALVE INSTALLATION, PRESSURE TRUNK "B",
DISTRICTS 5 & 6, SPECIFICATION NO. PW-041, AS
COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange
County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
\ .
Section 1. That the contractor, F. T. Ziebarth Company, has completed the
construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for ECCENTRIC PLUG VALVE
INSTALLATION, PRESSURE TRUNK "B", DISTRICTS 5 & 6, SPECIFICATION NO. PW-041, on
the 3rd of July, 1975; and,
Section 2. That the Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work
as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said
recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 3. That Eccentric Plug Valve Installation, Pressure Trunk "B", Districts
5 & 6, Specification No. PW-041, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with
the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 29th of May, 1975; and,
Section 4. That the Chairman of District No. 5 is hereby authorized and
directed to execute ~ Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with F. T. Ziebarth Company setting
forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Eccentric Plug Valve Installation,
Pressure Trunk "B", Districts 5 & 6, Specification No. PW-041, is hereby approved; and,
~ection 6. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the Board of Directors of
District No. 5 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on
behalf ·of itself and District No. 6.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 13, 1975.
AGENDA ITEM #9(u) -DISTRICTS 5 & 6 II Q"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
·FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. 2 ------------------------._...
CONTRACTOR: Rewes-Schock, JV DATE ____ A_ug..._u_s_t_7..;...,_19_7_s ___ _
Wet Well Repair and Remodeling at 14th Street and "A"
JOB: Street Pumpin2 Stations. Contract No. S-14R-6
Amount of this Change Order (AN&) (HIHJII) $ 0.00
' In accordance with contract provisicns, the following changes in the contract and/or
contract work are hereby authorized· and as compensation therefo_r, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Extension of Contract.Time
The.Contractor is hereby granted an extension of
time due to installation of bypass system by
District forces
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION
.summa!X of Contract Time
Original Contract Date
Original Contract. Time
Original Completion Date
~ Time Extension This Change Order
. Total Extension of Contract Time
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
Board authoiization date: August 13, 1975
Origin~] Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Change (lilm) ( lI!UitiOCX)
Amended Contract Price
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION
$
$
$
$
13 Calendar Days
13 Calendar Days
June 11, 1975
30 Calendar Days
July 11, 19 75
13 Calendar Days
13 Calendar Days
43 Calendar Days
July 24, 1975
22,960.36
4,960.36
0.00
18,000.00
DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, California
By ..
.~ Consu-l ting Eng i ncer
6y ________________________________ __ By--------------------~~~~~-----Ch i e f Engin~er.
Contractor
II R" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) DISTRICT 5 II R" ..
11s II
RESOLUTION NO. 75-117-5
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 5-14R-6 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION or THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING WET WELL REPAIR
AND REMODELING AT 14TH STREET AND "A" STREET
PUMPING STATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 5-14R-6, AS
COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County,
California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. 'Ihat the contractor, Rewes-Schock, JV, has completed the construction
in accordance with the terms of the contract for WET WELL REPAIR AND RHIODELING AT
14TH STREET AND "A" STREET PUMPING STATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 5-14R-6, on the 24th of
July, 1975; and,
. Section 2. That the Chief Engineer of the Districts has recommended acceptance
of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract,
which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 3. That Wet Well Repair and Remodeling at 14th Street and "A" Street
Pumping Stations, Contract No. 5-14R-6, is hereby accepted as completed in
accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 11th of June, 1975; and,.
Section 4. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Rewes-Schock, JV setting
forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Wet Well Repair and Remodeling at
14th Street and "A" Street Pumping Stations, Contract No. 5-14R-6, is hereby
approved; and,
Section 6. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the Board of Directors are
hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 13, 1975.
AGENDA ITEM #9(w) -DISTRICT 5 II s II
"T"
dOn greek & -
associates engineers · architects · planners
111 SOUTH ORANGE STREET ORANGE,CALIFORNIA 92666 PHONE (714) 997-2600
July 24, 1975
Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District #7
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Subject: Request for annexation to District #7
Gentlemen:
It is requested that the territory of tentative tract 8306,
described by the enclosed Exhibits "A" and "B" be annexed to
Orange County Sanitation District #7. The area of proposed
tract 8306 is certified to be 11.165 acres.
The owners of proposed tract 8306 are Donald D. Greek and Charles
H. Sandberg. A copy of the title report dated April 17, 1975
is enclosed for your verification.
Also enclosed is a check in the amount of $325.00 as required for
processing this request.
GJ
Enclosures
cc: Orange County Surveyors Office, Boundary Section
AGENDA ITEM #9(x) -DISTRICT 7 "T"
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
M E M 0 R A N D U M
August 6, 1975
Fred A. Harper, Gen~ral Manager
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALI FOHN IA
P.O. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910 '-"
(714) 962-2411
John D. Thomas, Chief of Industrial and Permit Division
Time Schedule for Adopting Industrial Waste Ordinance
Below is the proposed schedule of events leading to the adoption of the Industrial
Waste Ordinance.
August
13
14 -20
20
"U-1"
Presentation of general changes to the Boards of Directors.
General changes:
(a) S~ction 302 -Modify definition of Class I
dischargers.
(b) Section 302.4 -Modify Class I "charge for use"
to ·include aspects of a Revenue Program.
(c) Section 303 -Modify definition of Class II
dischargers.
(d) Section 303.1 -Modif); Class II user fee and
"charge for use" to include aspects of a Revenue
P~ogram.
(e) Section 402 -Delete excess capacity charges.
Review of.Ordinance changes by staff.
Mail proposed changes to existing permitees, conservation groups,
public agencies, chambers of commerce, manufacturing associations,
and general public.
AGENDA ITEM #14 -ALL DISTRICTS . •.
II U-1 "
Fred A. Harper
August 6, 1975
Page 2
August
25
25
26
26
26
27
27
AM Infonnal hearings with existing permitees.
PM -Informal hearings with existing permitees.
•
AM -Informal hearings with manufacturing associations, chambers
of commerce, and conservation groups.
PM -Informal hearings with public agencies.
Evening -Infonnal hearings with general public.
AM -Informal hearings with general public.
PM -Informal hearings with existing permitees.
28 -Sept. 4 .Final version of Ordinance available for staff review.
September
4 Final version mailed to Boards of Directors.
10 Boards· of Directors meeting. Set final hearing dates.
October
29 Boards of Directors meeting. First reading of Ordinance.
November
12 Boards of Directors meeting. Adoption of Ordinance.
"U-2" AGENDA ITEM #14 -ALL DISTRICTS "U-2" ·
"V-1"
city of orange
Yb~
' .
. lncorporeted 1888
orange civic center. 300 east chapman avenue ·orange, califomia 92666
post office box 449
department of public works
engineering division
(714) 53244«
July 16, 1975
Orange County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention: Mr. Fred A. Harper
General Manager
Regarding: Orange Park Acres Sewer, S-147
Tustin-Orange Trunk
Portion of Reach 18
Dear Mr. Harper:
As you are aware, the City is constructing a sewer from the intersection of
Randall Street and Meads Avenue south aloug Handy Creek to 600 feet south
of Amapola Avenue. A major portion of this sewer was designed under the
District standards, and will become part of Reach 18 of the Tustin-Orange
Trunk upon purchase by the District at some future time.
The ·construction of the trunk portion of the sewer will require the removal
and disposal of a considerable amount of ground water. The first choice
for disposal of the ground water was into Handy Creek. However, in our
discussions with the Water Quality Control Board, we were informed it
would take 180 days to obtain the proper pennit to allow this type of dis-
charge. Since our critical time schedule on this project could not afford
a delay of this magnitude, it was decided to discharge the ground water in
the sewer system.· Upon checking with your office, we were informed there
is a fee of $250 per million gallons for this type of discharge into the
system. It is estimated as much as 25 mg could be pumped on this project.
Since the District will be purGhasing this sewer from the City for its total
cost of installation, it would appear to be superfluous for the District
to charge the City the disposal fees and then have the City charge the
District the same fees as a portion of the installation cost of the sewer.
It is therefore requested that the City be allowed to dispose of the ground
water in the sewer system and the $250 per mg fee be waived.
AGENDA .ITEM #16 -ALL DISTRICTS "V-1"
"V-2"
Mr. Fred Harper
Page 2
July 16, 1975
Thank you· for your consideration in this matter, and if you have any
questions please do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
. ~ , ,
. l. /' "'
.. ll.,, '-1., •·
John V. Fonley
Director of Public Works
JVF:WWR:rh
cc: JVF
GDJ
WWR
File
Engr.
AGENDA .ITEM #16 -ALL DISTRICTS
\ .
"V-2"
"W-1"
MEMORANDUM
TO: THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
FROM: GENERAL COUNSEL
DATE: August 6, 1975
SUBJECT: Proposed Orange Park Acres Annexation
The Districts have received a request by a group
of interested property owners in the Orange Park Acres area
to be annexed into District No. 7 and concurrently to authorize
an election for the ispuance of bonqs to pay for the con-
struction of sewers through an improvement district.
At the last meeting of the Board of Directors, the
staff was requested to present its report concerning the
procedural requirements and anticipated preliminary costs
for such proceedings in order to allow the Directors to make
their decision at the earliest possible time.
I .have received the proposed procedure submitted by
the property owners and have discussed it personally with the
attorney representing that group. The proposed procedure is
one of two possible alternates that could be considered in
order to construct necessary sewer lines and have them paid
for by the benefited property owners. Specifically, the
proponents are requesting that the provisions of the District
Reorganization Act be utilized in conjunction with the County
Sanitation District Act as opposed .to the establishment of
an assessment district by the Board of Supervisors of the
County of orange.
The proposed procedure is highly complex, but it
is my opinion that it can be legally effective to both create
the necessary improvement district to operate the sewer lines,
as well as to provide the necessary bond financing for the
initial construction.
The apparent purpose in procee·ding under the pro-
posed District Reorganization Act is to obtain a financing
method that is satisfactory (i.e., the issuance of bonds to
be paid by either an ad valorem levy or a pledge of revenues)
AGENDA ITEM #39(A) -DISTRICT 7 "W-1"
"W-2"
but also to protect the property owners who are requesting this
action against a possible change of boundaries unless the bonds
are also approved by the voters. Specifically, the matter would
be given to the voters to approve the annexation to the sanita-
tion Districts {majority vote required) and to approve the
issuance of bonds {two-thirds approval required). It will be
contingent upon both elections receiving the necessary approvals,
so that in the event the bonds are not passed, the annexation
will, likewise, fail .
•
It should further be pointed out that to proceed
strictly under the County Sanitation District Act would not
allow the use of the improvement district bonds for collector
sewers, but by proceeding through the Local Agency Formation
Commission under the District Reorganization Act with the
separate proceedings and separate election, the general obli-
gation bonds for the improvement district can be used for
all sewers.
Accompanying this memorandum is the report from
Boyle Engineering Corporation outlining the engineering
requirements and cost projections and the additional legal
and administrative expenses are summarized below. Specifically,
the property owner pr;-oponents have tentatively indicated their
desire to retain the law firm of Wilson, Jones, Morton & Lynch
of San Mateo, California, who have, likewise, e~pressed a
willingness to represent them under certain conditions. If
the bonds pass, they will be paid in accordance with a rate
of 2% of the value of the bonds but, if the bonds fail, the
maximum legal fee to be incurred would be the sum of $2,500.00
plus any actual out of pocket expenses. In order for this
proceeding to materialize, it would be necessary for the County
Sanitation Districts to retain the services of this firm or
other bond counsel and it is, therefore, my recommendation
that all projected legal fees and costs should be deposited
in advance by the proponents, in the event the District elects
to proceed.
Specifically, it would appear that the following
summary of costs should be required by the proponents to be
deposited with the Sanitation District prior to undertaking
any further action:
Engineering, including EIR
Bond Counsel
Election expenses, county of Orange
Sub-Total
-2-
AGENDA ITEM #3.9(A) -DISTRLCT 7
$ 7,500.00
2,500.00
1,500.00
$11,500.00
"W-2" ·
"W-3"
Sub-Total carried Forward
Election expenses, non-County
Other legal and administrative
expenses by the Districts staff
Total
$11,500.00
1,000.00
2,500.00
$15,000.00
In the event the following procedure is approved
and carried forward with the result of successful passage
of both elections, the proponents would be required to pay
to the Districts annexation fees at the rate of $995.00 per
acre, the connection fees as established by District No. 7,
plus the individual property owner 1 s payment of the annual
ad valorem tax levied by District No. 7. The annexation fees
are imposed in order to recover a pro rata share of the total
capital outlay for the Districts facilities.
In the event the Board of Directors approves this
procedure and requires the deposit of monies, the initiation
of the proceedings could be commenced immediately after the
deposit of the necessary monies. Th~ initial steps there-
after would be to file the application to the LocalAgency
Formation Commission for the formation of the improvement
district and the request to approve annexation to the sanita-
tion Districts. rt would be anticipated that based on the
current timing schedule and legal requirements that the
election would be set for the June primary election (June 8,
1976). rt is possible that if all items fall into place
quickly, they could make the March 1976 regular local election
date. LI ct~ ~~L. Woodru~·
General Counsel
TLW: ab
-3-
AGENDA ITEM #39(A) -DISTRICT 7 "W-3"
...., BDLJ/e EnoineerlnCJ carparatian
; ; . L.
·' t.. :.. •••
• • ' • ·.; ·;. ,•. l
Ii.Ar. Fred A. Harper, Genera I Manager
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
OF ORANGE COUNTY
Attention.Mr. Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
P. 0. Box8127
fountain Valley, CA 92708
Orange Park Association, Inc. -Engineering Report
and Preliminary Environmenta I Review Request
August 1, 1975
\ .
In accordance with J..Ar. Lewis' request, we submit our propose I for preparing an engineer's
report in conformance with Section 4748 of the Hea Ith and Safety Code (Sanitation Dis-
trict Act) and a preliminary environmental review in conformance with the California
Environmental Quality Act.
The area proposed for sewer improvements, as shown on the sketch furnished by the Orange
Park Association, is approximately 556 acres. The northwesterly, northerly, and easterly
boundaries coincide with the city limits of Orange, the southerly boundary is Chapman
Avenue, and the southwesterly boundary for the most part is the westerly property line of
subdivided lots that front on Orange Park Boulevard.
The engineer's report wil I set forth the fol lowing information in accordance with Sec-
tion 4748:
A. A general description of existing district facilities for sewage collection, treat-
ment, and dispose I.
B. A genera I description of the work proposed to be done to carry out the objectives
of the district.
C. A genera I plan and genera I specifications of the work.
D. A genera I description of the property proposed to be acquired or damaged in
. carrying out the work.
E. A map showing the boundaries of the district and in genera I the location of the
work proposed to be done, property taken or damaged, and any other information
useful t? an understanding of the proposed work.
F. An estimate of the cost of the proposed work.
"W-4" AGENDA 'ITEM #39(A) -DISTRICT 7 "W-4 II
.. .
County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County -2-
We propose to prepare the engineer's report for a fee of $4, 180.
August 1, 1975
We will prepare an environmental study of the proposed project. This will serve as an
initial study, which is required of the district by the California Environmental Quality
Act to assess the probable impacts of implementing the proposed project and to make a
determination of the need to prepare an environmental impact report (EIR) or a neg~tive
declaration. Other responsible and jurisdictional agencies, such as the Local Agef'.lcy
Formation Commission of Orange County, will be consulted as a part of this initial ·study.
We propose a fee of $965 for the in itia I study.
If the initial study indicates that an EIR is necessary, such a report will be prepared for
the district in accordance with the Ca I ifornia Environmenta I Qua I ity Act. The report
will include a discussion of the local and regional environment, alternatives to the pro-
posed project, an evaluation of environmenta I impacts, and other content requirements
of the Act. Because a comprehensive EIR has already been prepared by the district for
the construction of the Tustin-Orange Sewer, Reaches 10 through 18, much of the data
is readily available. Our fee for the EIR would be $2, 100.
Included in the fees for the engineer's report, the initial study, and the EIR are repro-
ducible plates of the text, charts, and maps for the district's use in printing the desired
number of copies.
BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORAllON
. ('
/I " J -?··~·,,,,, .. /Vt , ·'
Cc1: uu[/l) ~cit..· :1.,1. '-' / /;'/_.,
Conrad Hohener, Jr., PE
Vice President
Id
"
"W-5" AGENDA .ITEM #39(A) -DISTRICT 7 "W-5"
II X"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
'of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108·4' ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71 "4) 5"40-2910
(71"4) 962-2411
S T A F F R E P 0 R T
August 7, 1975
SUBJECT: Sewerage Facilities for Orange Park Acres Area
The General Counsel has included a report relative to the proposal of the
.Orange Park Acres Association for concurrent annexation and bond authorization
for the Orange Park Acres area. The following is a brief staff report of two
possible alternate methods which could provide annexation to the District and
eventual installation of local collection sewers:
ALTERNATE A
Hold an election in the affected area to annex to District No. 7 with
the annexation fees collected from the property owners over a five
year period through a spec!al tax assessment on the real property and
improvements. Once the annexation proceedings were complete (approxi-
mately six months to one year) an assessment district or districts
could be formed to install the local collection sewers with District
No. 7 providing the Master Plan Trunk known as Reach 18. The current
annexation fee to District No. 7 is approximately $995 per acre.
While the assessment district costs are somewhat higher because of the
manner in which the financing is handled, the success or failure of
the proceedings is based on a majority protest by property owners
while the proposal of the Orange Park Acres Association will require
a 2/3 voter majority for approval of bonds for the construction of the
local system and payment of the annexation fees.
ALTERNATE B
Since this area is in the zone of influence of the City of Orange, an
election could be held for the residents in the area for concurrent
annexation to District No. 7 and the City of Orange. If this alternative
were successful, the District No. 7 annexation fees would be collected
by a special tax assessment as proposed Jn Alternate A. It would then
be the responsibility of the City of Orange to work out the local
sewering arrangements with the affected residents and property owners.
FAH:hje
AGENDA ITEM #39(A) -DISTRICT 7 "X"
CONSTRUCTION
PROGRESS REPORTS
JULY 31, 1975 .
-II
,-.
·------
ENGINEERI N G D E PART1\1EN T
..
...
BLOWER~-...
81JILDIJ.J6 ...__.......,.,.___,
I
lb q B 1 ' 5 4 J
/
~£,.(\"'\~ I
2 I
4 ~
6 5
8 7
10 9.
IZ II
14 /3
fE(ONDARY CLARIF/EKS
2 I
AERATION BA91N1
WArLLS up P..»b
~"'Nb Bl.An"!') d POWEK BUILD/116
· 50 MG D ACTIVATED . SLU OGE PLANT
. C.ONTRACT .NO .. p ·1 -l6
I
C.O.NTRACT .NO .. P1 -t6
SO MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT
Donovan Construction Company of Minnesota, Contractor
STARTING DATE: June 27 J 19 7 4 CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 14, 1976
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $29,876,ooo.oo
· PA ID TO DATE: $1 7 , 5 2 7 , 8 0 1 . 6 6
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED:
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE:
e
30 Calendar Days
Jan. 13, 1977
Contract is for the construction of Activated
Sludge secpr.da:ry treatment facilities at PZant No.
l. The new faci Zities wi t:l crid the I>i.stricts in
meeting m:zndated State and Federal ocean discharge
requirements .•
ivith Plant No. 2 effluent at the outfall booster
station, improving the overall quality of water
pumped through the outfall. system into the ocean.
Significant structures includ.ed in the contract
are the Blower Building, Aeration Basins, Second-
When completed, the seconda1-y treatment system
1.Ji.ZZ process the 50 mgd of wastewater flowing
through Plant No. 1. The effluent wiZZ then blend
. ary CZarifiers, wo I>i.gesters, Waste SZudge Thick-
eners and the Power Building •.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Work on.the Blower Building has picked up slightly as the contradtor obtains
more information about the mechanical equipment which is to be installed
· '1erein.
~
..
Structural work on the Aeration Basins is slowing as the contractor approaches
completion of these structures. Mechanical work has started but is progressing
slowly.
Work on the Secondary Clarifiers is also slowing as completion approaches.
Little in the way of mechanical equipment has been installed as yet. The
return sludge pump station (north end of seconda~y clarifiers) walls have been
completed.
Scaffolding has been completely removed from Digester 10 and is now being
installed for the forming of Digester 9 dome. The control building walls
between the two Digesters are complete.
Work on the Waste Sludge Thickeners this month. has been severly hampered by
the contractor's inability to obtain adequate information from the sludge
thickener equipment supplier.
Various degrees of sandblasting are being reviewed for appearance on the
exterior of the Power Building walls. Some electrical work in the Power
Building is also being accomplished.
' .
DIST. 2
CONTRACT No. 2-15
BLVD.
~
~
~
CAL STATE FULLERTON 'C
CAMPU5 ~
CONTRACT No. 2-15
YORBA LINDA PUMP STATION
J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation & Henck Pro,
· A Joint Venture, Contractor
STARTING DATE: Sept. 26, 1974
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $671, 146. 00
PAID TO DATE: $269, 679. 89
Contract is ·for the construction of a reinforced
concrete structure to house wet wells and pwnps
for transferring tributary lJXlstewater through a
force nnin line into the Santa Ana River, Carbon
CaniJon Inte1~ceptor-re lief Trunk Line system for
conveycuzce to Tlasteu.;iater Reclamation Plant Noo 1
in Fountain Vatley. This will assist in relieving
the presently congested Newhope-Placentia Trunk
Line and wilZ serve propos9d Zand use development
of the tributary area to the year 2010.
·The pwnp station structure is located at the in-
tersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated
Road in Fullerton. It is being constructed on
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 22, 1975
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 15 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMP LE TI ON DATE: Oct• 7, 19 7 5
•
what was originally UniversitzJ of California, Ful-
lerton property at the northern perimeter of the
campus. Special, arrangements were m::zde 1,;ith the
University for use of the property.
The above-ground portion of the structure ui Z.Z be
a ZoliJ profile slab 8 5' :c 109 ', 2 feet above
ground. The deepest portion of the structure wUZ
be 35 feet under the ground·. The Dist~ct has
agreed to construct a slump-stone fence around the
structuPe and l,arzdscape the area in accordance
with future corr.patibte use by the University. The
llniversibd pZans to construct an arboretum in the
imm~diate area at some fut;ure date.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
~
Structu~al construction is essentially complete. Access stairway to motor
room has been poured and completed. Inside surface finishing is in progress.
Plastic liner in wet wells is complete and spark tested. Contractor will
begin to backfill the south side of the building to surface level the first
·week in August, leaving the north side for installation of input pipelines.
Tunnel for 15'' inpub line is under excavation to the manhole junction in
Yorba Linda Blvd. Tunnel for the 24" input line will be started during
AugusL
Water. pumps and motor drive units are due for delivery and installation
towards the end of August.
. ..
81/?CH ST.
IMPERIAL l-IWY. ··----.
BA~TANCWl.l~Y t Rt>. -----
_DI SJ._2_
----COMPLETE
---TO BE CONSTRUCTED
CONTRACT No. 2-16-1
CONTRACT No. 2-16-1
KRAEMER BOULEVARD INTERCEPTOR SEWER,
FROM PALM DRIVE TO IMPERIAL HIGHWAY
Ge6rge Miller Constructf on Company, Contractor
STARTING DATE: April 24, 1975
0 RI GI NA L C 0 NT RAC T: $ 5 6 3 , 9 ~ 6 • 8 0
PAID TO DATE: $384, 146. 30
Contract is for instaZ.Zation of 24" and 21" Vitzi-
. fied Clay Pipe (V. C.P.) along Kraemer BoulevaPd
·from Palm Drive in Placentia to Imperial. Highway
in Brea, ~ appro:drra.te distance of 1. 5 miles. . .
This project is part of the Santa Ana River, Car-
bon Canyon Interceptor-reZ.ief system, designed, in
part, to divert flows from the north portion of
District 2, relieving the presently congested New-
hope-PZ.acentia Trunk Z.ine to Wastewater Reclama-
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 21, 1975
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 21, 1975
tion Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. The souther-
ly tenninus of the interceptor-relief system is at
the dive1•sion structure at Plant No. 1.
The Kr>aemer Boulevcaid Interceptor portion of the
interceptor-relief system is designed tc har.dle
flows up to 25 million gallons per da.y and wiZ.Z
serve the proposed land use development in the
tributary caiea to the year 2010.
ACTIVITIES.PURING THE PAST MONTH
Contractor laid 2200 feet of pipe during the month. Full traffic flow has
~een restored from Palm Drive to Bagnell St. Backfilling is complete to
---3agnell St. First course paving has been installed L:.P to Bastanchury Rd..
Traffic is restricted to one lane north and south on Kraemer Blvd. from
Bagnell St. to the Tri-Cities Park. A 275-fopt section of road being widened
is restricted to one lane northbound between Bickford and Somerset Streets.
Kraemer Blvd. will be closed to through traffic between Golden Ave. and
Imperial Highway starting July 31st for a period of six weeks to allow
construction in that section.
N
· _DlSJ._2 _
____ complete
.. , I .,. l I'-:/ ••• ,.: •
l:.;,~l r: • .•• • •• I
ALTA
!// <"' •:• •• ~· .~ ! .·:.!
/' •• ·">1 ... " ·"'E ,. < .... ·"I'\. .;.' .:
ST.
CONTRACT NO. 2-17-1
CONTRACT No. 2-17-1
CARBON CANYON-PALM DRIVE INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH 1
Bebek Company, Contractor
ST AR TI NG DATE : Dec • 2 6 , 19 7 4
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $733, 147. 00
PAID TO DATE: $731,004.34
Contract is· for instaUation of 39" diameter Vit-
rified Clay Pipe (V.C.P.J from Crowther Avenue,
400 feet from its interoection 1.JJith ~filler Street
in Anaheim north through generally W'l.developed
land containing low brush coverage, oil fields and
orchards to Aita Vista Avenueo The line then goes
under Alta Vista Avenue and ~raverses the Alta
Vista Golf Course to Palm Drive in Placentia, at
the intersection of Warren Street. The job length
is approrima te ly 1. 2 miles
Contract 2-l'l-l is part of the Santa Ana River,
Carbon Canyon Interceptor-relief eystem, designed,
in paxrt,, to divert flows from the north portion of
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: June 30' 1975
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 6 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: June 30, 1975
District 2, relieving the presently congested New-
hope-Placentia trunk line to Wastewater Reclama-
tion Plant No. 1 in.FoW'ltain Valley. The souther-
ly terminus of the interceptoi,-relief system is at
the diversion structure at Plant No. 1. It joins
Contract 2-17-2 on the north end and drains into
Contract 2-18 to.the south.
This portion of the· interceptor-relief system is
designed to handle flows up to 37. 5 nrillion gal-
lons per cla.y and wi U, in part, seroe proposed
Z.and use development in the northern District 2
tributary area to the yea:t' 2010.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
C 0 N T R A C T COMPLETE
.-DI S_T .__2
• --·TO BE CONSTRUCTED
CONTRACT·
No. 2-17-2
l<OSE
8l VP,
VALENCIA VE.
~·
DR.
CEDARLllWN' DR.
LINDA VISTA ~T.
CONTRACT No. 2-17-2
CARBON CANYON INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH 2
Mark Dakovich, Incorporated, Contractor
STARTING DATE:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT:
PAID TO DATE:
Dec. 26, 1974
$539,462.00
$540,588.00
. Contro.ct is for the installation of 39" Vitrified
Clay Pipe (V.C.P.} from the intersection of Palm
Drive and Warren Street in Placentia, west on Palm
Drive to Kraemer Bou'levard, a distance of app:roxi-
m:zteZy one mi'le.
Contract 2-17-2 is part of the Santa Ana River,
Caribon Canyon Interceptor-relief system, designed,
in part, to divert f'la.Js from the north portion of
District 2, re'lieving the preserzt'ly congested Nehl-
hope7PZacentia Trunk 'line to WastetJater RecZcona-
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: June 24' 1975
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 21 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: July 15, 1975
•
tion Plant No. 1 in fountain VaZZey. The sou.ther-
Zy terminu.~ of the interceptor-relief system is at
the diversion structure at PZc:nt No. 1. It joins
Contract 2-16-1 on the north end and drains into
Contract 2-17-1 to the south.
This portion of the interceptor-relief system is
designed to handle flOt.Js up to 37. 5 minion gal-
lons per day and will, in 'part, serve proposed
Zand use development in the norr-thern District tri-
butary a1~ea to the year 2010. . .
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
C 0 N T R A C T COMPLETE
...
·.
DlST._2_
11SJ1 ,.. COMPLETE
'
Cf\RBON CANYON 1 NTERCEPTOR SE\.IER
LA PALMA AVENUE TO CRO~THER AVENUE
CONTRACT NO. 2-18
(
1.3 MILES OF 66 11 & 39" PtPE
CONTRACT AWARDED JUNE 27, 1974
COST: $1,472,160 SCHEDULED TOR COMPLETtON FEBRUARY, 1975
( .
CONTRACT NO. 2-18
CARBON CANYON INTERCEPTOR SEWER
S. S. Zarubica, Contractor
STARTING DATE: CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Feb. 22, 1975
ORIGINAL CONTRACT:
June 27, 1974
$1,472,160.42 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 128 Calendar Days
PAID TO DATE: $1,481,327.04
Contract· is for instaZZation of Reinforced Con-
crete Pipe (R. C.P.) from 66" diameter at the be._
ginning of the project to 39" at its corrpletion.
The contract begins at the intersection of Grove
Street and La ·pazrra Avenue in Anaheim, travels
along La Palrra Avenue west to MilZer Street where
it turns north to Crowther Avenue, then west to a
point 400 feet from the intersection where it ter-
minates, a distance of approxirrateZy 1.4 miles.
Conf;ilac't 2-18 is pa:Pt of the Santa And River, Car-
]Jon Canyon Interceptor-relief system, designed, in
part, to divert flows from the north portion of
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: June 30' 1975
District 2, relieving the presently congested NeuJ-
hope-Placentia Trunk line to Waste.Jater Reclama-
tion Plant No. 1 in.Fountain Valley. The souther-
ly terminus. of the interceptor-relief system is at
the diversion structur>e at Plant No. 1. It joins
Cont1•act 2--17-1 on the north end and dPains into
Contract 2-14-2 to the south.
This portion of the interceptor-relief system is
designed to handle flows up to 42 mi Uion gaUor.s
per day and will, in part, serve proposed land use
deve)opment in the northern District 2 tributary
area to the yea:r 2010.
ACTIVlTIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
~11 underground work is complete. Final paving and cleanup during ~ugust
will close out the contract.
,,
')a ~
EDWARDS ~ .--. ,.ST.
I )
~ "" ... ,
.
~
"' (I\
-4
:t -z
~ ....
"' ~
60l0fN WEST ST. !
CITY
()/:'
:t
WESTMINSTER
l> -2:.
U\ . -;'4
~~~ '"_,.., -f !-{OOVER ST. i--
r. h
~ > ~ ~ N
" ) ~ 1J
0
~
~
~
BEACH BLVD.
11
A
~ __ DI SJ._3_
COMPLETE
t-JE Wl.AND 5T. -Illa -TO BE CONSTRUCTED
11 CONTRACT No. 3-18
CON.TRACT No. 3-18
KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACH 4
A. G~ Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Co.,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
START! NG DATE:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT:
PAID TO DATE:
June 1, 1973
$4,334,412.00
$4,494,025.82
Contract is for installation of approxim:ztely 2o 7
miles of 96" F.e.inforced Concrete Pipe (R.C.P.)
from the intersection of Ne1 ... fland Street ar.d Bo "lsa
Avenue in County territory, west on BoZsa Avenue
to Hoover Street in Westminster, north on Hoover
Street to Main Street where it turns west to Gol-
denwest Street, then north to Westminster Avenue.
From this intersection, the contract continues
west on Westminster Avenue with the installation
of approxim:ztely . 5 mile of 63" R. C.P. to Edi.Jards
Street. An additional 200 feet of 63" R. C.P.
reaches from the intersection of GolderMest Street
and Westminster Avenue north on Go ZderMest Street
to where it joins with Contra.at 3-20-1
A siphon structure is to be constructed at West-
""linster Avenue and EdJ.Jards Street to connect this
~roject into the Westnr~nster Avenue Interceptor
Sel.i)er (Contract 3-14).
· This project is a portion of the Knott Interceptor
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: May 26, 197 4
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 379 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: June 8, 1975
relief system desigr£d to intercept flows from the
northi...Jest and west portions of rr~strict J, reiiev-
ing the presently congested Miller-Holder Trunk
Line to ~lasteu..'ater Treatment Plant No. 2 in Hw1-
tington Beach. The southerly terminus of the sys-
tem is at the intersection of Brookhu.rst Street
and El.Zis Avenue in Fountain VaZZey. It UJil."l
eventually extend to Imperial Avenue in La Habra.
The Westrrrir.ster Avenue Interceptor Sewer which
connects to this system at r·lestrrrin.ster Avenue and
EdbJards Street was corrp Zeted in J arw.ar'l.J 19 71.
FZoo:; from the west portion of District 3 through
this f aci Zi ty are now tributary to the Miller-
HoZder T1,,..,,azk Line.
This portion of the Interceptor re Zief system is
desigr.ed to handle flows of up to 105 rrriZZion gal-
lons per day and wiZ l ser-ve proposed Zar.d use de-
veZopment of the tributary area to the year 2010.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
All underground work is.completed. Traffic signals have been restored. Final
paving on Goldenwest St. and Westminster Ave. and cleanup during August will
complete the contract.
STANTON SiORM
I
I
l!i I
>1 ~.
I CHAPMAN
\\~~'bq~ Cr ., :)
~ -
I
" I
~ I
BELGRAVE I
D
I
t-I .... a ()
~ I
~ I
• I LAMPSON
~ --.,..
WEST i
SCHOOL '.
DJ_ST. __ .. 3 AVE.
--COMPLETE
---TO BE CONSTRUCTED
CONTRACT
No. 3 -20-.1
(J\
Cl 1-/UM BCL i ~ tt
q:
21 ~ LU '
0 Q
lll .J
g~
If I
.
Ul >
AVE. ~
N
2
Cle
UJ
\-
Ul w
~
AV~ .
'-"'.
SE5TEL AVG.
]
TRASK AVE.
2.f ST. GT.
WESTMINSTE~ AV£.
CONTRACT No. 3 20-1
KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 5 AND 6
Sully-Miller Contracting Company, Contractor
STARTING DATE:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT:
PAID TO DATE:
Oct. 31, .1974
$4,602,992.00
$2,270,394.00
Contract is for installation of a 66" Reinforced
Concrete Pipe (R. C.P.) trunk line from the inter-
.section of Goldern..Jest Street and Westminster Ave-
nue in Westminster to 1200 feet south of KateZZa
Avenue on Knott Avenue in Stan.ton, a distance of
approxim:::r.tely 2. 8 miles. Knott Avenue is the
northern extension of Gold~est Street.
Thia project is a portion of the Knott Interceptor
relief system designed to relieve the presently
congested MiHer-Holder Trunk Sewer by intercep-
CONTRACT COMPLETION· DATE:. Oct. 30, 1975
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 30, 1975
• ting fl01.Js from the northLJest portion of District
3. The southerly tcrr.rinus of the syster.: is at the
intersection of Brookhurst Street a~.d Ellis Avenue
in Fountain Valley. It wiU eventuaUy extend to
Imperial. Avenue in La Habra.
This portion of the relief system is designed to
handle a flow of 75 million gallons per day and
will serve ·the proposed developed Zand use plan in
the tributary area to the year 2010. ·
ACTIVLTIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Contractor laid 983 feet of pipe during the month. Four hundred feet was on
the .north heading, north of the Garden Grove Freeway.·
~he 176' tunnel under the Garden Grove Freeway and the 48' tunnel under
Garden Grove Blvd. are complete. Pipe installation into the 176' tunnel will
begin the last week in July.
Goldenwest Street is backfilled and paved with first course asphalt and four
lanes of traffic restored from Westminster Ave. to 1300 feet south of Garden
Grove Blvd., opposite Goldenwest School. The first 1000 feet of this section
is in the final stages of pipe joining and backfill. The final 300 feet is
under ~xcavation to ,join up with the tunnel under Garden Grove Blvd. Traffic
is restricted to one lane north and south in this area. Every effort is
being made by the contractor to provide access to the restaurant and the gas
stations adjacent to the work.
The north heading has been halted 1500 feet south of Lampson while Gulf Oil
Co. moves an 8 11 oil line out of the way. Estimated time for this operation,
3 weeks until excavation can be resumed.
A new heading has been opened 800' south of Chapman Ave. to allow continued
progress in excavating. Traffic has been rout~d to the west side of Knott
Ave. with one lane north and south from 1500' south of Chapman to approximately
500 feet north of Chapman Ave. Traffic is also restricted to one lane north
and south on Knot~ Ave. from the Garden Grove Freeway to Lampson Ave.
I '•
,.
JI LINCOLN 11 IL . ...
I
I CITY OP DEL I
M~I ANAJ-/EIM
!
I
. I OLIA/DA
~E • ~B
(')RANGE I . AVE.
N
4Sc~'t)"' ,..~a~ c~e..b
\' c:a. ~'-~ v9\ \..~\. ~ii-\C-
~\l(r, 1 ~~a 3~ ~
!l
fi ·ROAD
. ~
CITY c;r n
b
B
~ BUENA §
~ t~ ~ PARK ~c
~ ~e ~ 6
"" CERRITOS
!
B
n AVE.
n
u
I
B
n
~.
DlS.T. __ 3_
Al/€.
_..._COMPLETE
i.B .. mm TO BE CONSTRUCTED
CONTRACT No. 3-20-2
..•
CONTRACT No. 3-20-2
KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 7
A. G~ Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Co.,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
STARTING DATE: March 6, 1975
ORIGINAL. CONTRACT: $3,876,870.00
PAID TO DATE: $L!52, 010. 50
Contract is for installation of a Reinforced Con-
crete Pipe (R.C.P.) sewer line from a point 1200
feet south of Kate lla Avenue on Knott Avenue in
Stanton, north on Knott Avenue to Lincoln Avenue
in Anaheim,· a distance of 2. 3 miles. Pipe diame-
ters are 72" for the first 3, 900 feet, 63" for
6, 900 feet and 66 11 for the reir.aining 1200 feet of
the proj eat. Flows from this reach lJJi l l drain in-
to Contract 3-20-1 to the south.
This proj eat is a portion of the Knott Interceptor
relief system designed to relieve the presently
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: March 6, 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: March 6' 1976
congested ~JiZZer-HoZder Trunk Sewer by intercep-
ting flows from the nort~est portion of District
3. The sout}zer>ly terrrrinus of the system is at the
intersection of Brookhurst Street and Ellis Avenue
in Fountain Valley. It will eventually extend to
Imperial Avenue in La Habra.
This portion of the relief system is designed to
handle a flow 0 f 6 a mill ion ga z Zons per day arid
lAJill serve the proposed developed land use plan in
the tributary area to the yeap 2010.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Contractor laid 800' of pipe during the month. Manhole structure and siphon
n the intersection of Knott Ave. and Katella Ave. are complete . ..._,
A 400' section of.pipeline from Katella Ave. south on Knott Ave. remains to
be laid before proceeding north on Knott Ave. The southbound traffic lane
on Knott Ave. closed July 29 for a period of 14 days to allow room for the
contractor to lay this section. ·
Backfilling and first course paving over the first 800' of pipeline already
in the ground is beihg delayed to allow the Southern California Water Co. to
move an 8 11 water line between Longford St. and the southern terminus of the
contract.
A 500' portion of Knott Ave. between Katella Ave. and Kermore St. will be
closed td through traffic August 7 for a 30-day period to allow 6onstruction
through that section. Restricted street width makes the closure necessary.
The cities of Cypress and Stanton were consulted on the closure and agreed
closing the street would accelerate construction work thr~ugh the area with
the least inconvenience to the public.
_DLSJ. __ 3
.-.-COMPLETE
---TO BE CONSTRUCTED
CONTRACT
No. 3 -21 -1
·L-~ATELlA AVE9 . • ,,_~-=-=--~-------
9': ~
~ (:)
A ~
~ 2 '-" ~ ~
~ ~
)ic
'cJ qs ..... ---
FAR&'O"JiAR
CONTRACT No. 3-21-1
WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR,
REACHES 25, 26 & PORTION OF 27
A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Company,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
STARTING DATE: June 26 J 1975
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $1,416,448.00
·PAID TO DATE: $00.00
Contract is for the installation of a Vitrified
ctay Pipe· (V. C. P. J sewer from the vicinity of the
District's ~lestside Lift Station, 1800 feet west
of SeaZ Beach BouZevard and ILZmpson Avenue along
the flood control. channel,. along the channel to
Seal Beach Boulevard where it turns north along
Los Alamitos BouZevard (the northern extension of
Seal Beach Boulevard) to Katella Avenue. It then
t-uPns east on Katella to Lexington Drive, where it
temrinates. Pipe diameter is 39" for the first
·D, f>()O feet, 36" for the next 5, 700 feet and 30"
for the final 5, 200 feet. Total, Zength is approx-
imately 3.1 miles.
This project is a continuation of the Westside
ReUef Interceptor sewer which begins at the SeaZ.
!ach Boulevax>d Pwnping Station at the intersec-
~
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 22 J 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Qalendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLEeTION DATE: Jan. 22 J 1976
tion of Seal Beach Boulevard and West:r.rir..ster Ave-
nue in the City of Seal Beach. The system wil.Z
eventually run generally in a ~.ortherly direction
through the western portion of District J and will
terminate. at Cresent Avenue and Moody Street in
the City of La Palma.
Upon completion, the system ~ill relieve the Los
Alamitos Subtrunk Sewer which, at present, func-
tions as the main interceptor sewer for the west-
side basin and, for the most part, is currently.
jLorJJing at or near peak cc:paai. ty.
This portion of the relief interceptor is designed
to handle flows of up to 14. 7 mil.Zion gallons per
day and wilZ. serve the proposed developed land use
plan in the tributary area to the year 2010.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
A traffic meeting was held with the Los Alamitos Police Department on July 18th
to determine traffic routing and signing during construction of the section
around the corner of Los Alamitos Blvd. and Katella Ave.
Pr.econstruction conference with the City of Los Alamitos and all affected
agencies was held July 31st.
Construction schedule has been completed. Contractor will start bore pits
for tunneling under obstructions in three places August 4th. Excavation of
the main trench will begin in Los Alamitos Blvd. above Rossmoor Way August 11.
Traffic island removal and traffic diversion ~triping at the corner of Los
Alamitos Blvd. and Katella Ave. will. begin the week of August 11. Traffic
restriction notices to the public have been posted at all approaches to the
construction project.
. . • •
CONTRACT No. 5-14R-6
WET WELL ~Er,AIR & REMODELING AT
14TH STREET & 'A' STREET PUMPING STATIONS
Rewes-Schock, JV, Contractor
STARTING DATE: June 11, 1975 CONTRACT CO~PLETION DATE: July 10, 1975
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $22, 960. 36 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 13 Calendar Days
PAID TO DATE: $18, 000. 00
Contract is for cleaning, application of fr•·mite
and fibergZassing wet wez:l waZZs in the 14th
Street and "A" Street Pwnp Stations on Ball;oa
BouZ.evarid in Newport Beach.
District cret.Js at the same time are replacing 6"
suction lines with 8" as part of an overaZZ pwrrp
station refurbishing project. District crews are
a'Lso instaZZing one additionaZ B" suction Une in
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: July 24, 1975
each station to accorrmodate increased capacity of
the stations when a third pump is in.staZZed in the
future.
In addition, the bubbler system pipes, used to
provide pump actuation circuitry to the motor
rooms are being rep Zaced in each station by Dis-
trict personne Z.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
C 0 N T R A C T C 0 M P L E .T E
·~
Fl RST SiREcT
BRYAN AVE.
t l SAN JUAN
~ ~
~
_DJST. __ 7_ ~
~
_ _. CCMPLETE
·--11 TO BE CONSTRUCTED
CONTRACT No. 7-6-6
CONTRACT No. 7-6 -6
TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER,· REACH 10
McGuire Construction, Inc., Contractor
STARTING DATE: Jan. 23, 1975 CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: July 22, 1975
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $575,575~40 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PAID TO DATE: $564,485.40 PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: July 22, 1975
Contract is for installation of a 27" dia100ter
.Vitrified Clay Pipe (V. C.P.) sewer from the inteP-
section of Red Hill Avenue and MitcheU Avenue in.
County territory west on /.fitcheZZ Avenue to New-
port Avenue, then north to Irvine Boulevard in the
City of Tustin, a distance of approximately l. 7
miles
eventually extend north to Villa Park Road ar.:!
Santiago BoulevaI'd in Orange, providing drainage
for the central and northern portions of District
7.
This project is a part of the 'm:i.ster-planned Tus-
tin-Orange Trunk Line Relief system. It will
This section of the system is designed to handle
fZOl.Js of up to 9. 64 miZZion gallons per day ar.d.
LYiZ'L serve proposed Zand use deve Zoprnent of the
tributary area to the yeaI' 2010.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH ..
Contractor laid 1500 feet of pipe during the month. Heading is now at the
intersection of Newport Blvd. and First St. 1000 feet of pipe remain to be
1.aid.
-..,,,.;
..
Minor traffic restrictions continue on Newport Blvd. between Main St. and First
St. Base course a~phalt has been laid as far north as Brian St. on Newport
Blvd. Traffic is still restricted to one land south bound for 800 feet
behind the heading. teft turns from Newport Blvd. into the shopping center
or on to First St. are closed during working hours.
The open trench, in the process of being backfilled, now extends to 500 feet
south of First St. ~he .contractor will open cut across First St. during the
first week of August. Traffic diversion plans for the open cut have been
drawn up and approved by the City of Tustin.
~cttf\T~
.s. '"' Q..~ . ~.~~.,. wl( \~ t-.~'1·
N
..
. DtSJ._7_
• s COMPLETE
----TO 13E CONSTRUCTED
CONTRACT No.7-6-7
CONTRACT No.7-6-7
TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, REACH 11 & PORTION OF 12
Rogers. & Davies, Contractor
STARTING DATE: May 29, 1975
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $1, 349, 818. 00
PA I D TO DATE : $ 8 3 , 2 4 8 . 0 0
Contract is for the installation of 1.? mites of
Vitrified CZ(zy Pipe (V.C.P.). The project starts at the intersection of Irvine Bouleva:rd and Nel.J-
port Avenue in Tustin and goes north along the
Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way to l?th
Street in County te!Titory. It continues north in
Esplanade Avenue to Fairhaven Avenue, where it
turns east for 100 feet and terminatesa Pipe dia-
meter is 24" for the first 7, 000 feet of the pro-
ject. The remaining pipe is 21" in diameter.
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED:
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE:
Nov. 25, 1975
0 Calendar Days
Nov. 25, 1975
This project is• part of the rrrzster-p Zanr:ed Tustir.-
Orange Trwzk Line ReUef system. It u.~Z'l eventu-
a'lZy extend north to · Vil 'la Park Road and Santiagc
Bou"levard in Orange, providing drainage for the
central, and northern portions of District 7.
This section of the system is designed to handle
f'lozJs up to 9.64 mi"llion gal"lons per day and will,
serve proposed "land use deve"lopment of ~he tribu-
tary area to the year 2010.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Contractor installed 1900 feet of pipe during the month. Brush clearance
has been completed and access roads graded on each side of the railway for
equipment movement. Trenches have been dug and vitamins injected for
~reservation of eucalyptus trees. Trench is backfilled to within 600 feet
of heading.
Trenches under 17th Street and the flood control channel above Dodge St. are
complete. A tunnel· under the flood control channel on Fairhaven Ave. will
be started during the first.week in August. Some traffic restriction will
be experienced during this operation.
a '•
SUMMARY
TREATMENT PLANT WORK
Total Value Under Contract $ 2 9., s 7 6, o·o o
Total Work to Date 17,527,802
Total Work During July 1,663,186
DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK
Total Value Under Contract $15,544,573
Total Work to Date 9,083,978
Total Work During July 1,660,258
Total Work Under Design 1,594,427
Total Work Out to Bid 4,678,458
Total Work Awaiting Award 3,814,462
TOTAL AMOUNT UNDER CONTRACT, DESIGN, OUT TO BID
AND AWAITING AWARD
$29,876,000
$15,544,573
1,594,427
4,678,458
328142462
$55,516,920
• ·I
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS.
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
July 25, 1975
NOTICE TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
~Donald Winn, Joint Chairman
~Norma B. Gibbs, Vice Joint Chairman
("-Kerm Rima
1. Michael Callahan
~· Phillip Cox
v Don Mcinnis
" John Store
a... Vernon Evans
(for John Garthe)
/ vSupv. Laurence Schmit
1
• Subject:
-4
!;
Committee Meeting -Wednesday, July lQ_,_!975
5:30 p.m .
,r:
,. l '·. Chairman Winn has asked us to notify you that there will
be a meeting of the Committee in the Districts' off:i.ce at
the above hour and date, as discussed at the July Joint
Board meeting. A brief report on items to be discussed
is attached.
The meeting is scheduled for 5:30 p.m., and dinner will
be served at 6:30 p.m.
FAH:j
~ti!).[~
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
i
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE CO UN TY, CA LIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
108·44 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORN I A 92708
July 25, 1975
MANAGER'S REPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: July 31, 1'75 -5:31 ,.m.
Chairman Winn has called this meeting for 5:30 p.m.
(714) 5 40-2910
(7 14) 962-2411
Directors Robin Young and Robert Ward have b een invited to
attend and participate in the discussions.
1. Consideration of Interim Audit Report from Districts'
Auditors.
At the July 9th Joint Board meeting, a representative of
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Company, Certified Public Accountants,
submitted an interim r epor t recommending several changes in Dis -·
trict accounting procedures. This matter was referred to the
Executive Committee for· review and recomme ndat ion. Enclosed is .
a staf.f report relative to the auditors' comments. Our Director
of Finance, Wayne Sylvester, will discuss our report and comment
in more detail on the auditor's recommendati ons at the meeting.
We have asked a representative from the audit firm and our
General Counsel to attend the meeting. Mr. Woodruff will be pre-
pared to comment on the Directors' liability and/or responsibility
in the event some of the auditors' recommendations are not autho-
rized for implementation.
2. Additional Primary Treatment Facilities at Plant No . 2.
Enclosed is a staff report r e lative to the addition of two
needed primary clarifiers (24 mgd) at Plant No. 2 . As stated in
the report, without these new facilities, by next year our flows
will be exceeding our treatment plant cap~cit ies, thereby sub-
jecting th~ Districts to possible legal action by the Regional
Water Quality Control Board to r es trict and/or stop the issuance
of sewer connection permits within the Districts for lack of
adequate treatment f acilit ies. Had the St ate Board and EPA
moved forwa rd on the Districts' Project Report for Improved
Treatment at Plant No. 2 , which was submitted to them in March
of last year, these facilities may have been grant funded, but
instead, ~11 progress toward construction on this has been delayed.
It is the staff's recommendation that we proceed immediately
to. construct these facilities,which should not exceed $2.5 million,
~sing District funds.
.,
3. Districts' Budge ts for 1975-76 Fiscal Year.
Enclosed are the proposed individual Distric t budgets which
have been prepared for the Committee members ' consideration.
The tax rates in each of the District s are dropping slightly
as a result of a reduction in the taxes needed to retir e the
variou s bond issues and other fixed obligations.
· Districts 1, 2, 7 and 11 appear to be able to finance the
anticipated construction at the treatment plants as well as
within their own Districts for the foreseeable future, based on
the enc l osed 5-year cash-flow projections.
District No. 3 will need to defer the construction of Contract
No. 3-20-3, Knott Interceptor Sewer, Portion of Eeach 7 and Reach
8, during this fiscal year, in order to fund the District's ·current
obligations for anticipated treatment p l ant construction. The
5-year cash-flow projecti on shows pro forma deficits for the 77-78
and 78-79 fiscal years ; however, the 79-80 fiscal year is improved,
showing a substantial cash position . Therefore, we feel that
District No. 3 will be financially sound . Some projects may be
delayed because of lack of fundin g .
The cash-flow projections for District No . 5 indicate a
serious financial problem beginning with the 77 -78 fiscal year .
In both Districts 5 and 6, we project that the ~perating costs
of these two Distri cts and their share of operating costs for
the treatment plants will exceed the ir anticipated ad va lorem
tax revenues in three or four years. Serious consideration
must b e given the next six months to methods of increasing these
two Districts ' revenues.
4. Exp a nsion of the Board Room Facilities and Office Space.
With the increased activities of t he Districts, we are rec eiving
more public participation at the Board meetings and other meetings
held in the Board room . The present occ upancy capacity, based on
the Fire Code , is limit ed to. 81 persons. In addition, our account-
ing and supporting office facilities are not adequate to hou se the
personnel required to efficient l y handle the increased paper work
as a result of the increasing act i vities , suc h as, the grant con-
struction and the Industrial Waste Permit programs . Several years
ago, when the Districts' offices were expanded, a se cond s tory was
constructed but left unfinished (approximately 4500 sq. ft.). The
staff is recommend ing that a Building Committee be appointed to
study the current needs of .the Districts relative to possible
enlargement of the Board room and completion of at least a portion
of the unfinished second story for add itiona l office space.
-2 -
5. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
(SCCWRP) Representation.
Since 1969, the Districts have been parties to a Joint
Powers Agreement which created an agency known as the Southern
California Coastal Water Research Project Authority (SCCWRP).
The other entities participating financially are the City of
Los An geles , Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts , Ventura
Regional County Sanitation District and the City of San Diego.
Currently, the agency has an annual budget of $500 ,000 , of
which our Dist rict s contribute approximately 15 %. Each agency
appoints a repres entative to sit on a 5-man Commission which
directs the activities of the research project studying the
effects of treated wastewater on the Southern Cali f ornia marine
environment. Recently, the Boards amended the Joint Powers
Agreement to continue the agency to June, 1979.
Since the formation of this agency, we have been r epre-
sented by Lindsley Parsons, who is a former District Joint
Chairman and Newport Beach City Councilman. Mr. Parsons was
reappointed by the Boards to the Commission for a 3-y ear term
in 1972. Director Henry Duke serves as an alternate to
Commissi oner Parsons. Bo th terms have expired and it will be
necessary for the Boards to take action concerning District
repr esentation on the SCCWRP Commission. The Execut i ve Committee
may wish to make a recon@endati on to the Joint Boards r egarding
the appointment of a representative and alternate .
6. Selection of Engineers for Plant No . 2 Construction
Design Services .
Enclosed is a brief staff report sugges t ing the method of
employing several engineering firms for design services in con-
junction with the proposed improvements at Plant No . 2 during .
this fi~c a l year. We will be prep a red to go into considerable
detail as to how the staff negoti ates with selected firm s regard-
ing design fees.
7. Status Report on the JPL (ACTS) Process -1 MGD Pilot
Plant.
The Technical Advisory Committe e for the JPL Act iv ated
Carbon process will be meeting on Ju l y 29th relative to the
construction of the 1 mgd ·pilot plant. Chairman Wi nn has asked
for a verbal updat e report concerning the pro gress a s well as
problems encounter ed relative to the construction of the pilot
unit.
Fred A. Harper
General Man ager
,..,.
August], 1975
F ILE D
Jn the O ffic e of the Secretary
C oun:tY S a nitati on Distr ict
No @
AUG 13 1975
eyC'JC#.a
REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: July 30, 1975
5:30 p.m.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0 . BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
Members present: Donald Winn, Joint Chairman; Norma Brandel
Gibbs, Vice Joint Chairman, Michael Callahan,
Phillip Cox, Don Mcinnis, John Store, and
Supv. Laurence Schmit
Members absent: Kerm Rima and John Garthe
Staff present: J. Wayne Sylvester, Director of Finance, Ray
E~ Lewis, Chief Engineer, and Thomas Woodruff,
General Counsel
Others: Mike Harrison, Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company
Convened:
Adjourned:
5:30 p.m.
8:35 p.m.
***************
1. Consideration of Interim Audit Report from Districts'
Auditors.
At the July 9th Joint Board meeting, a representative of
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Company (PMM), Certified Public
Accountants, submitted an interim report recommending several
changes in District accounting procedures. This matter was re-
ferred to the Executive Committee for review and recommendation.
Mr. Mike Harrison, representing the auditors, p2.rticipated in the
discussions relative to their recommendations and the staff's
comments. Wayne Sylvester, the Districts' Director of Finance,
has prepared a combined report which includes the Executive
Committee's comments and recommendations. The Districts' General
Counsel advised the Committee that the Directors are not bound
to adopt, totally, the recommendations of the Auditors, particularly
when the recommendations would lead to added costs exceeding any
monetary benefits. (See enclosed report for the Committee's
recommendations).
2. Additional Primary Treatment Facilities at Plant No. 2.
Enclosed is a staff report relative to the addition of two
needed primary clarifiers (24 mgd) at Plant No . 2. As stated
in the report, without these new facilities, by next year our
flows will be exceeding our treatment plant capacities, thereby
subjecting the Districts to possible legal actio n by the Regional
Water Quality Control Board to restrict and/or stop the issuance
of sewer connection permits within the Districts for lack of
adequate treatment facilities. Had the State Board and EPA moved
forward on the Districts' Project Report for Imp~oved Treatment
at Plant No. 2, which was submitted to them in March of last year,
these facilities may have been grant funded, but instead, all
prog~ess toward construction on this has been delayed.
It is the staff's recommendation that we proceed immediately
to construct these facilities, which should not exceed $2.5
million, using District funds.
Following a lengthy discussion concerning this, the
Committee directed the General Counsel to look into the matter
of delays and see if anything can be done from a legal standpoint
to expedite a grant and, that based on the staff's recommendation,
the Executive Committee recommends that the Districts proceed
immediately to construct the needed facilities using District
funds.
(NOTE: Subsequent to the meeting of the Executive
Committee, Chairman Winn met with EPA officials in
San Francisco and as a result of these discussions,
he advises that there is some chance that grant
funds could be approved for the two clarifiers and
associated facilities while the EPA Environmental
Impact Statement is being prepared. Chairman Winn
has asked the Executive Committee to meet at 7:00 p.m.,
August 13, immediately preceding the Joint Board meeting,
for a report and reconsideration of the Committee's
recommendation in li ght of Chairman Winn 's recent
discussions with EPA personnel.)
3. Selection of Engineers for Plant No. 2 Construction Design
Services.
The Executive Committee reviewed the enclosed staff report
suggesting soliciting proposals from several engineering f irms
for design services for the 75/76 improvements at Plant No. 2.
It is the Committee's recommendation that the Boards authorize
the staff to proceed as proposed. Chairman Winn asked that if any
Directors desire additional information re gard ing the manner in
which the staff negotiates with selected eng ineering firms regard-
ing design fees, please contact the Districts ' Chief Engineer ,
Ray Lewis.
-2-
4. Expansion of the Board Room Facilities and Office Space.
With the increased ~c tivities of the Districts, we are r eceiving
more public participation at the Board meeting s and other meetings
held in the Board room. The present occupancy capacity, based on
the Fire Code, is limited to 81 persons. In addition, our account-
ing and supporting office facilities are not adequate to house the
personnel required to efficiently handle the added paper work
as a result of the increas ing ac t ivities, such as, the g rant con-
struction and the Indus trial Waste Permit pro grams. Se veral y ears
ago, when the Districts' offices wer e expanded, a second story was
constructed but left unfinished (ap proximately 4500 sq. ft.). The
staff is recommending that a Building Committee be appointed to
study the current needs of the Districts r~lative to possible
enlargement of the Board room and completion of at least a portion
of the unfinished second story for additional office space.
Following a brief discussion, it is the Committee's re c om-
mendation that the Joint Chairman b e authorized t o ap po int a
.. Build·ing Co mmittee to study the curre nt needs of the Districts
relative to additional office and Board room space.
5. Districts' Budgets for 1975-76 Fiscal Year.
The Districts' Director of Finance presented the proposed
individual District bud g ets for the Committee's considerati on.
He reported that the tax rates in each of the Districts are
dropping slightly as a result of a reduction of the taxes needed
to retire various bond issues and other fixed obligations.
Districts 1, 2, 7 and 11 appear to be able to finance the
anticipated construct ion at the treatment plants as well as within
their own Districts for the foreseeable future, based . on the en-
closed 5-year cash-flow projections .
District No. 3 will need to defer the construction of Contract
No. 3-20-3, Knott Interceptor Sewer, Portion of Reach 7 and Reach
8, during this fiscal year, in order to fund the District's current
obligations for anticipated treatment plant cons truc t ion. Th e
5-year cash-flow projection sho ws pro forma deficits for the 77-78
and 78-79 fiscal years; however, the 79-80 fiscal year is improved,
showing a substantial cash position. Therefore, the staff feels
that District No. 3 will be financially sound, but some proj e cts
may be delayed because of lack of current funding.
The cash-flow projections for District No. 5 indicate a serious
financial problem beginning with the 77-78 fiscal year. In both
Districts 5 and 6, th e operatin g costs of these two Distri0ts and
their share of operating costs for t h e treatment plants will exceed
their anticipated ad v alor em tax r even u es in t h ree or four ye ars.
Serious consid era tion must be g iven in the nex t six months t o methods
of increasing these two Districts' revenues.
-3-
..
The Committee directed the staff to include the proposed 75/76
budgets in the August agenda for the individual Boards' considera-
tion.
6. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP)
Representation.
Since 1969, the Districts have been parties to
a Joint Powers Agreement which created an agency known as the
Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority (SCCWRP).
The other entities participating financially are the City of Los
Angeles, Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, Ventura Regional
County Sanitation District and the City of San Diego. Currently,
the agency has an annual budget of $500,000, of which our Districts
contribute approximately 15 %. Each agency appoints a representative
to sit on a 5-man Commission which directs the activities of the
research project studying the effects of treated wastewater on the
Southern California marine environment. Recently, the Boards
amended the Joint Powers Agreement to continue the agency to June,
1979.
Since the formation of this agency, we have been represented
by Lindsley Parsons, who is a former District Joint Chairman and
Newport Beach City Councilman. Mr. Parsons was reappointed by the
Boards to the Commission for a 3-year term in 1972. Director Henry
Duke serves as an alternate to Commissioner Parsons. Both terms
have expired and it will be necessary for the Boards to take action
concerning District representation on the SCCWRP Commission.
The SCCWRP Commission meets quarterly and the representatives
and their alternates receive compensation as follows: ·
"The members of the Commission and each alternate attending
shall receive as expenses $50 per meeting not to exceed $100
per month where permitted by law.11
During the discussion concerning representation for the Districts,
the Joint Chairman advised that he had had a discussion with Lindsley
Parsons who indicated that he would be pleased to continue at the
Directors' pleasure.
It was the consensus of the Committee that all Directors
interested in serving on the SCCWRP Commission and who have the
time, should contact the Joint Chairman, and those Directors respond-
ing will be considered by the Committee, in addition to the current
Commissioner and alternate.
-4-
.~
7. Status Report on the JPL (ACTS) Process -1 MGD Pilot
Plant.
Mr. Lewis reviewed the progress relative to the acquisition
of equipment for the construction of the ACTS 1 mgd pilot unit.
To date, we have received authority from the State and EPA to
purchase equipment costing $600,000.
The Technical Advisory Committee, made up of representatives
of JPL, Districts' staff, consulting engineers, EPA and the State,
met on July 29th to review some of the evaluation work being done
by John Carollo Engineers and JPL personnel. Mr. Lewis advised
that the Committee will meet again this month, at which time all
cost-effective evaluation information will be reviewed for the
purpose of d e termining if there are any new factors not previously
considered prior to final commitment to construct the pilot unit.
-5-
,·
.,
(
PEAT, MARWICK, MrrcHELL & Co.
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
888 NORTH MAIN STREET
SANT.A ANA,CALIFORNl.A 92?01
June 26, 1975
The Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Dear Members of the Buards:
we have completed our interi~ examination of the financial records of The
Orange County Sanitation Districts for the period July 1, 1974, through
May 31, 1975. As part of our examination, we reviewed and tested the
Districts' system of internal accounting control to the extent we considered
necessary as required by generally accepted auditing standards. Under these
standards, the purpose of such evaluation is to establish a basis f~r reliance
thereon in determining the nature, timing and extent of other auditing pro-
cedures that are necessary for expressing an opinion on the financial statements.
The objective of internal accounting control is to provide reasonable, but not
absolu·te, assurance as to the safeguarding of assets against loss from unauthorized
use or disposition, and the reliability of fiuancial records for preparing
financial statements and maintaining accountability for assets. The concept of
reasonable assurance recognizes that the cost of a syste~ of internal accounting
control should not exceed the benefits derived and also recognizes that the
evaluation of these factors necessarily requires estimates and judgments by
management.
There are inherent limitations that should be recognized in considering the
potential effectiveness of any system of internal accounting control. In the
performance of most control procedures, errors can result from misunderstanding
of instructions, mistakes of judgment, carelessness, or other personal factors.
Co~trol procedures whose effectiveness depends upon segregation of duties can be
circumvented by collusion. Similarly, control procedures can be circumvented
with respect either to the execution and recording of transactions or with re-
spect to the estimates and judgments required in the preparation of financial
statements. Further, projection of any evaluation of internal accounting
control to further periods is subject to the risk that the procedures may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, and that the degree of compliance
with the procedures may deteriorate.
Our study and evaluation of the Districts' system of internal accounting control
for the period July 1, 1974 through May 31, 1975, which we made for the purpose
set forth in the first paragraph above, was not designed for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on internal accounting control, and it would not neccs-
aarill disclose all weaknesses in the system, However, such study and evaluation
July 24, 1975
M E M 0 R A N D U M ----------
TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager
FRCY.-t: J. Wayne Sylvester, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: Interim Audit Report
CouNv ~AN1rAr10N D1srn1crs
of Oi\ COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108•• [LLIS AY!NU!
FOUNTAIN VAUEV, CALlfOllNIA 92704
(71 •l ~·0·2910
(71') 962-2'1 I
Peat, l.iarwick, Mitchell & Co. {Pl-fl-I) has completed their interim review of the
Districts' financial records for the current fiscal period which included a routine
review of internal accounting controls. Because of the transition of accounting ac-
tiviti~s to the Xerox EDP System we specifically requested that the auditors review
internal control procedures relative to the new accounting svstems, We are also
requesting the auditors to review several other areas and would expect recom~endations
to be forthcoming in this regard. The following comments are offered in connection
with the auditors' report. ·
P~!.\l has been very helpful to the Districts' accounting staff durin~ the course
of their preliminary work, particularly with regard to the transition of the account-
ing functions to EDP, and we look fori.·ard to continued assistance from the auditors.
As you know, with few minor exceptions, our staff has been fully aware of the points
set forth in the auditor's management letter of June 26, 1975. However, certain
procedures have not been in effect for one or a combination of the following reasons,
each of which is more specifically addressed later in this status report:
Several of the recommended procedures would not be cost effective.
(The auditors have recognized this in paragraph two of their letter
which states, " ••• The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes
that the cost of a svstem of internal accounting control should
not exceed the benefits derived ••. "); and/or
Previously planned procedural changes have been proceeding under
an orderly imolementation schedule. (Several com::ients to this
effect are more addressed in the respective texts of these reports
on such matters as new purchasin2 and warehousinp, procedures, and
capabilities which the recent conversion to EDP now allow that
would not have been practical in the past.)
Further, many of the auditors' cor.ur.ents are a result of Pi.r.l's unfamiliarity with
the full extent of procedures in effect due to somewhat limited exposure to date
-,
·p. M. M.o CO. (
The Boards irectors
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
June 26. 1975
2
diaclosed certain conditions that we believe to be weaknesses that warrant your
attention and our co111nents and recommendations are presented for-your considera-
tion in the pages that follow.
JOURNAL ENl'R!ES
Our review of journal entries revealed that not all entries were approved by a
responsible individual independent of the preparer prior ~o being entered in the
various general ledgers. In order to minimize the possibility of errors being
entered into the accounting records, all entries should be reviewed and approved
by a responsible individual _independent of the preparer.
It was further noted that since converting the general ledgers from a manual
system of accounting to the Xerox Computer Service ten:tinal, adequate user
controls ha~e not been maintained over journal entries made. To provide
. assurance that all entries are being entered into the accounting records via
.,the teri:iinal, all journal entries should be recorded on prenumbered forms with
all numbers being accounted for on a monthly basis. Before the journal entries
are sent to the terminal operator for process~ng, batch controls over total
dollar aa>unts should be established for subsequent comparison with printed
reports to verify that the various District ledgers have been properly updated.
CASH RECEIPTS
In accordance •ith current procedures, the receptionist opens the mail and pre-
pares a daily listing of mail receipts. To provide assurance that monies
received are being properly deposited with the County Treasurer, a responsible
individual i~dependent of the receptionist and the person making the deposit
should compare the daily listing of mail receipts to the deposit order returned
by the County Treasurer.
DAILY DEPOSITS
Cash receipts are not being deposited on a daily basis. A procedure of depositing
all receipts on a daily b&sis improves internal control by minimizing the amount
of cash on hand and thereby reducing the risk of loss. Also public money will
be available for investment more promptly.
Fred A.. Harper
July 24, 1975
Page 2
(
to all District systems. (The audit's letter has been thoroughly reviewed with PMM
and their staff is now more fully cognizant of the above as noted in the co~Jnents
that follow.)
The preamble of the aud~tors' report is es~entially from the auditing manual,
and.basically addresses the l~tent of the interim report and the inherent philosophy
of ~nternal co~trols. Emphasis is, of course, on the recognized need to continually
review accounting control procedures to assure that they remain in effect and ade-
quatel)' provide for changing conditions. This remains the policy of the Finance
Department, and I encourage the full support of management and the Boards in enforc-
ing this policy.
JOURNAL EITTRIES
It ~s current F~nance De~artment policy that all journal entries be approved
by the Director o: Fi~ance pr~or to entry into the.accounting system. During the
~ourse of the audit, it was discovered that approx1mately four journal entries had
inadverte~tly been pro~essed without the ~hove approval. A Finance Department memo
has been issued restating the current policy to provide assurance of confon:iance with
s~id policy •. It shou~d be noted,,however, that on occasion, in the absence of the
Director of Finance, Journal entries must be made to the system in order to avoid delav
o~ accoun~ing data entry. These entries then receive post facto approval by the •
Finance Director.
. To strengthen journal entry control, pursuant to conversion to EDP, pre-nwr.bered
Journal entry forms are being ordered, and continuous dollar batch Gontrols have been
added to current batch verification procedures for reconciliation with systec output
of monthly general journal entries.
CASH RECEIPTS
Procedures have been added to the existing internal controls to provide for an
independent third party verification of cash receipts with the County Treasurer's
deposit order.
DAILY DEPOSITS
It is inherent in basic accounting philosophy that cash receipts be deposited
on a daily basis. Our staff agrees with this philosophy and recognizes its ro}e in
internal control procedures. We also appreciate that PMM is professionally obligated
to bring this item to the Districts attention.
P. M.M.a CO.,
The Board . Directors
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
June 26, 1975
3
•
SUSPENSE ACCOUNTS
"i'be Districts currently follow the practice of recording certain types of trans-
actions in suspense accounts until a determination of the proper treatment of the
transaction can be made. We feel that all entries made to these accounts should
have the prior approval of the Director of Finance. ·
A. represented to us by your accounting personnel, these accounts are used as
a type of clearing account. To preserve internal control, the accounts should
be analyzed on a monthly basis to determine whether any transactions have been
inadvertently .charged to the accounts and forgotten.
Under the current system, supervisors report employee tine to the accounting
department and distribute payroll warrants to the employees. Such a procedure
allows for the possibility of erroneous time to be reported and go undetected.
Internal control over the issuance of payroll warrants would be improved if
personnel responsible for adding new names to ~he payroll master files and
reporting employee time do not have access to et:1ployee warrants.
It was also noted that the payroll clerk has direct access to, and performs
limited ci.aintenance on personnel files. Elements of good internal control
dictate that personnel record-keeping and payroll processing are incocpatible
functions and should be performed by separate individuals. We further suggest
that the payroll clerk be denied access to the personnel files.
Fred A. Harper
July 24, 1975
Page 3
(
The daily deposit of cash receipts would add a m1n1mum one-quarter of a man
ye~r at an_ estimated annual cost of $5,000, including transportation required to make
sa1~ deposits at. the County Treasury. It should be noted that the present District
policy docs provide for immediate deposit of substantial amounts received such as
construction grant payments. However, the bulk of District revenue is b/ virtue of
ad valorem tax apportionments made through the County Treasurer-Tax Collector's office.
These funds are deposited directly by that office to the credit of the respective
Districts, and at no time are funds processed through our office. The accounting
transaction to record said allocation is made following notification of the apportion-
ment by the County Auditor-Controller. With the exception of construction grant fund
receipts and certain deposits of connection fees by the cities, the actual cash re-
ceived at the Districts' offices is very nominal. Further, these cash receipts are
generally in the form of checks, pure cash transactions seldom being handled by the
Districts.
In view of the additional cost of implementing the procedure of daily deposits,
it is recommended that the present District policy of depositing receipts on a weekly
basis, with immediate deposit of substantial receipts, be continued. This recommen-
dation has been reviewed with P~~f and they realize the cost/benefit relationship.
Their staff has indicated that our present policy pose~ no real.problems from their
standpoint and would not require any alteration of their audit procedures.
SUSPENSE" ACCOUNTS
It is present District policy to minimize the use of suspense accounts. How-
ever, the accounting for certain transactions cannot always be fully determined at the
time of original entry. Therefore, suspense accounts are, on occasion, utilized.
The rr~jority of transactions of this nature are by virtue of journal entries and,
therefore, receive prior approval of the Director of Finance under established proce-
dures. These procedures are being expanded to incorporate the requirement of prior
approval of accounts payable and cash receipts transactions to suspense accounts.
The present policy of annually reviewing said accounts is being further modified to a
quarterly basis. PMM has agreed to the sufficiency of this modification.
As you know, until approximately six months ago, payroll warrants were distri-
buted to employees via the U.S. Mail. However, because of the rapidly deteriorating
mail service, we experienced an increasi~g number of problems from this method, i.e.,
delayed warrants, lost warrants, returned warrants, etc. We therefore reverted to
the present systen of having the division supervisors distribute paychecks to their
respective employees:
Current procedures relative to the auditors previously expressed concern include,
but are not limited to, the following:
1) All employee status changes are approved by the division supervisor,
department head, and General Manager.
P. M. M.'8 CO. (
The Boards _ Directors
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
June 26. 1975
4
Fred A. llarper
July 24, 1975
Page 4
(
2) PayToll time cards provide for the signature of two responsible staff
members (i.e., foreman and supervisor) prior to acceptance by the
Payroll Division. The department head and General Manager approve
a 11 overt irnc.
3) Time cards and/or payrolls are audited and batch controlled by the
Districts' Finance Department and the County Auditor. Paychecks
are signed by the County Auditor.
4) Paychecks are distributed to each supervisor via the department
head.
S) Personnel are required to sign a fonn acknowledging receipt of their
payroll check (heretofore said acknowledgements have been maintained
in the departmental files; however, they will now be filed with the
Personnel Division).
6) Terminating er.iployees immediately desire refund of their retirement
and are required to visit the Personnel Department to si~ appropriate
forms, thereby reducing the possibility of the Payroll Division not
being apprised of a termination.
As a practical matter, the division supervisors, because their employees are
located and/or rotated among several sites, are best equipped to issue payrcll
warrants as they generally visit the job sites each day. Alternatives would be to
have employees pick up their paychecks at a central location or to have an indepen-
dent c~ployee distribute paychecks, thus diverting their efforts from other assi~ed
duties. Neither of these appears cost effective.
It is therefore recommended that the present method be maintained, and that at
unannounced and variable frequencies, an independent third party be assigned to
distribute paychecks. These procedures have now been more thoroughly reviewed with
the auditor and they have expressed their satisfaction therewith.
In the past, payroll processing and personnel file maintenance have been main-
tained in the sar.ie office because of the small size of the Districts' clerical staff.
Any other approach would have required the addition of a clerk at an estimated current
cost of approxi~~tcly $10,000, including overhead. Because of changes in State and
Federal reRUlation which require implementation of new programs, and the fact that
our personnel complement has now reached the size where it is feasible to centralize
supervision of all personnel administration, the Boards have approved the new position
of Assistant to the Chief of Personnel Division. This organizational change, as
recomm~nded by the staff, will allow for further separation of payroll processinR and
personnel recordkeeping duties. However, complete separation of duties at this time
would require the addition of a clerk's position.
-,
·p, M. M.8i CO. (
The Boards !rectors
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
June 26. 1975
5
TERMINAL SECURITY
It waG observed that acc£ss to the Xerox Computer terminal is not physically
restricted. In order to prevent unauthorized individuals from gaining access
and making changes to District accounting records, the terminal should be main-
tained in a locked room. A selected responsible individual should maintain
cuatody of the key and only allow authorized individuals access to the terminal.
PETIX CASH
Petty cash procedures should be amended to require an of fi~ial independent of
the petty cash custodian to examine and cancel petty cash vouchers at the time
the fund ia reimbursed.
PURCHASING
During our exacination of documents supporting warrants issued during the year.
we noticed that in some cases the dates appearing on vendor invoices arc prior
to dates appearing on the Districts' purchase order. This would indicate that
the normal controls over purchasing have been by-passed. We understand that
this should happen only when an emergency purchase is made in order to preserve
the public health and safety. We suggest that emergency purchases be examined
inore closely to determine that such purchases do, in· fact, qualify as an.
emergency as defined by the Boards.
Fred A. Harper
July 24, 1975
Page S
TER.\tl};AL SECURITY
(
The Xerox computer terminal is in a separate accountin~ machine room with locked
door. The room has been posted to prohibit admittance of unauthorized individuals.
It should be noted in this rer,ard that a provision of the Xerox system is the require-
ment that access to the computer is allowed only after entry of a password. Knowledge
of this password, .,.·hi ch is periodically changed, is restricted to key personnel.
PEITY CASH
Petty cash vouchers are now signed by the employee receiving reimbursement; or,
in the event a payment is cade directly to a finn, said payment is made by check and
endorsed by the payee. Reimbursements of any magnitude (to an ernployee or firm) are
always made by check. In addition, the Director of Finance signs each voucher which
is approved for payment. Vouchers arc effectively cancelled at the time of data entry
into the accounting system. The General Manager then certifies to the Board of Direc-
tors that he has reviewed all warrants presented for payment (including the petty cash
reimbursement warrant) and recommends payment thereof. Further, vouchers are then
reviewed and processed by th< County Auditor-Controller prior to issuance of a war-
rant from his office.
It is felt that these procedures provide sufficient control of petty cash expen-
ditures and following a further review of same, PMM has concurred ~ith the above.
PURCHASING
You will recall that some time ago I recommended that the Boards consider engag-
ing a consultant to review purchasing and warehousing procedures and rr.ake appropriate
recor:u:iendations because of significant changes in the Districts' procurement responsi-
bilities. As a result of said recommendation, a consultant was err.ployed and completely
revised purchasing, and inventory procedures have been prepared. Inventory is the
final application to be implemented on the new Xerox system, and this effort is being
coordinated ..,.ith the move to the new warehousing facility. Each of the points set
forth in the interim audit report were included in the new procedures under implemen-
tation, which, as observed by P~N, combined with the change fro::-. a decentralized to a
centrali:cd purchasing effort, will greatly enhance our purchasing and warehousing ac-
tivities in this regard. It is paramount, however, that this effort receive the full
cooperation of all department and division staff and the complete support of management.
During, and upon completion of implementation of new procedures, I have requested the
auditors to review and make appropriate recommendations for improvement thereon.
-,
-P. M~M:a CO. l
The Boards \_ uirectors
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
June 26, 1975
6
As explained to us by the Director of Finance, the Districts' purchasing pro-
cedures have just recently been revised to provide for a more centralized
purchasing approach which should fu~ther strengthen internal control.
Through discussions with the Districts' accounting personnel, it was determined
that there were certain weaknesses in internal control over inventory. The
following weaknesses we~e noted:
a. All incoming merchandise, materials and supplies are not required
to pass through a central receiving location.
b. When a copy ~f the purchase order is.being furnished to receiving
clerks to be used as a receiving report, quantities are not being
omitted to insure the receiving clerk is actually counting quantities
received. •
c. Inventory custodians are not required to report obsolete, unusable
or overstocked inventory items to the accounting department so
they may be properly written off and disposed of.
d. Perpetual inventory records arc not balanced to general ledger
controls at reasonable intervals.
e. Perpetual inventory records are not maintained by persons other
than custodians of the goods.
f. Inventory classes are not physically counted periodically during
the year to deter.nine recorded quantities equal quantities on hand.
We understand that some of the aforementioned weaknesses are due to inadequate
f~cilities and will be rectified as soon as the recently constructed inventory
facility becomes available for use.
FIXED ASSETS
In order to provide assurance that assets recorded on the Districts' books are
still in existence and are being used, periodic physical inventories of assets
should be taken on a rotating basis and any discrepancies between the detailed
records and physical existence should be promptly investigated. ~ny required
adjustments should then be made to the accounting records.
Also, the custodians of fixed assets should be required to report, in writing,
to the accounting department any changes in the status of the Districts' assets,
i.e., transf~rs between locations, sales, scrapping, obsolescence, excess, etc.
Before the aforementioned reco1I1Dendations could be implemented, it would be
necessary to more clearly define specific assets and fix responsibility for
groups of assets by location. It is further suggested that all items of
personal property be identified by permanently affixing a prenumbered fixed
aaaet tag thereto. ·
Fred A. Harper
July 24, 1975
Page 6
FIXED ASSETS
(
Prior to adoption of the State Controller's Uniform Accounting System for Waste
Disposal A~encies in 1970, fixed asset depreciation accounting was not required.
Members of our staff participated in the formulation of the Uniform System and we are,
therefore, extremely familiar with the requirements. Since that time, a full-time
staff accountant has had primary responsibility for developing fixed asset record
keeping and "'e no"' have the most comprehensive fixed asset accounting system of ar.y
waste disposal agency in the state, if not the nation.
The nature of the Districts' fixed assets are such that the bulk of the dollar
value represents as~ets that do not "disappear", i.e., concrete structures and large
sewage treatment equipment items, the major problem being the reporting ~o the account-
ing department of any change in the status or location of a given asset. Adequate
enforcement of the existing job plan procedure would assure that this pro~lem is
minimized.
-,
. P. M:M:a CO. (
The Boards Jirectors
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange Councy
June 26, 1975
7
PROJECT COST ACCOUNTING
Throughout the past fiscal year payroll hours paid employees have not been
reconciled to hours charged to various work orders. To be certain all hours
paid have been properly charged to a work order number for purposes of ac-
counting for specific project costs, payroll hours paid 1;hould be reconciled
vith hours charged to work orders on a IllC>nthly basis. We understand that the
afor~entioned procedure will be done automatically as soon as job cost
accounting is c~nverted to the Xerox system.
* * * * *
It should be noted that this letter, by its nature, is critical in that it
contains only our comments and recommendations on deficiencies observed during
the course of our interim examination. It does not include our observations on
the strong features of the Districts' internal control also observed.
Fred A.. Harper
July 24, 1975
Page 7
(
Needless to say, specific identification of over $160 million dollars of present-
day fixed assets (expected to increase to approximately $500 million dollars by the
year 1985), and periodic inventories thereof, is a monumental task. The Districts'
fixed asset recordkeeping system continues to be one of the most complete in existence
and the application has recently been converted to the Xerox computerized system. Al-
though considerable progress has been made to date, without additional staff we project
that it will be a minimum of five to seven years before all assets can be identified
to provide ~hat we feel would be an adequate inventory of the fixed assets of the
Districts. To account for fixed assets to the extent suggested in the auditors' letter
and/or to expedite the process would require·the addition of an accountant assistant
engirieer, and a clerk, at an estimated annual cost of $50,000. Even with ~dded per-
sonnel, the task will be extremely time consuming and as noted above, costly.
We have discussed this matter at great length with PMM and they now appreciate
the magnitude of the problem. We are continuing to work with the auditors in the area
of fixed asset accounting and periodic progress reports will, 0f course, be submitted.
PROJECT COST ACCOlr.'\IING
Payroll hours paid emploY.ees have always been verified to hours cha•ged to the
work orders. Hoi.'ever, procedures in the past have proved for such verification prior
to data entry ir.to the system. With exception of periodic random verification, the
practice of post-entry recor.ciliation, although deemed desirable, has not been followed
for several reasons. First, such a procedure would have required addition.al account-
ing personnel in the Districts' Finance Department, at a current estimated annual
approximately $14,000, including overhead. Secondly, the cost accounting system of the
Districts is intended primarily to serve two functions: (a) provide cost information
as an administrativ~ tool to assist in effectively controlling operation and mainte-
nance expenditures, and (b) to provide for cost determination of fixed asset improvements.
Neither of these presently affect rate setting, Further, because the Districts' function
as a governmental entity is outside the traditional use of cost accounting in a profit-
making organi:ation, the cost records are more of a memo nature to perform the above
functions. To my knowledge, our Districts are the only governmental agency with a
comprehensive cost accounting system such as we have.
However, as stated above, this procedure is deemed sufficiently desirable as to
have weighed heavily in the.staff's recommendations to consider converting the account-
ing activity to electronic data processing. It is now a moot point as upon implementa-
tion of the Districts' cost accounting procedures on the Xerox system effective July 1,
1975, this reconciliation procedure became automatic.
Again, I would like to reiterate my appreciation to the staff of Peat, Marwick,
Mitchell & Company for their work to date. They have provided us with more constructive
assistance than any auditor in the past and we look forward to their continuing assistance.
As you know_, our accounting system was used as the model in the development of the State
-,
P. M·.M·.a CO. (
The Boards Directors
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
June 26. 1975
8
Ve would like to express our appreciation for the courtesy and a;sistance ex-
tended to us by personnel of the Districts during our interim work. Should we
have further recommendations which we feel warrant Board attention as a result
of our final examination work, a supplecent~l letter to the Boards will be
issued at that time. We would welcome the opportunity to provide further
assistance to the Districts in any area where lack of available time or
apecialized skill might prevent your staff from acting.
Very truly yours,
PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHEU. & CO.
~F~H~~::~
VFH:at
Fred A. Harper
July 24, 1975
Page 8
(
Controllers Uniform System of Accounting for California and is now being considered
by a co~.rnittee of the ~ater Pollution Control Federation as a model on an international
scale. We are continually consulted by our counterparts wto are establishing or
improving their systems. I would urge continued support of our position of leadership
in accounting for waste water treatment agencies and respectfully request any appro-
priate direction from yourself and the Boards,
cc: Peat, Man.-ick, Mitchell & Co.
-,
Item No. 2
S T A F F REPORT
July 24, 1975
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71.C) 5-40-2910
(714) 962-2-411
Subj~ct: Additional Primary Treatment Facilities at Plant No. 2
The Project Report for Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, which was submitted to
the State on March 1, 1974, has n~t, to this date, received any comment or
approvals from the State or Environmental Protection Agency. The Districts' plans
for improved treatment and reliability of facilities have been incorporated into
a Step I Grant along with the evaluat1on of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory's
Activated Carbon Treatment System process. A Facilities Plan, along with an
Environmental Impact Statement which will include recommendations for additional
facilities, as well as advanced treatment processe·s to meet the State and
Federal requirements, will be completed in the· Spring of 1976.
At the present time, the Districts' total treatment capacities arc 172 million
gallons per day, with 12 million gallons per day standby. The present flows
being treated at the joint works facilities are approximately 175 million gallons
per day. The staff has been greatly concerned over the treatment capabilities
and the time required·for the processing of a grant application and the construction
of any project under the grant program. Past experience has indicated that from.
concept approval to completion of the facilities is approximately 2 to 2-~ years.
The last construction contract for additional treatment capacities was Contract
No. P2-19 which was completed in September, 1972.and made operational on
September 16, 1972, provided for 24-MGD of additional primary treatment capacities.
Attached with this memo is a graph which delineate.s the flows to date and the
projections to the year 1985. It is obvious from this flow projection that the
Districts are in need of additional capacities which must be furnished sooner
than the.implementation period presently experienced in the grant progrrun. When
the CORF budget was presented to the Boards in June, staff felt that additional
treatment facilities could be built under the grant program prior to the
completion of the Step I efforts to comply with the reliability guidelines as
phblished by the Environmental Protection Agency. Subsequent to the presentation
of the CORF budget, the staff has heen informed that the State and Environmental
Protection Agency arc reluctant to approve any additional facilities prior to the
final adoption of the Environmental Impact Statement because of the ''sensitive
nature'' of the air quality --growth inducing aspects of treatment plant capacities.
It is, therefore, ·becoming more apparent ~hat the Districts must proceed to
provide the necessary treatment capabilities to meet our commitments to the
community and to the requirements as set forth in the Districts' NPDES Permit,
in order to avoid any mandate from the Regional Board for the cessation of sewer
and building permits. It would, therefore, be recommended that staff be
authorized to:
Staff Report
July 24, 1975
Page Two
1. Proceed with the advertising for public bids for the procurement of
necessary equipment for the installation of two primary clarif-
iers at Plant No. 2.
2. Solicit proposals for engineering services necessary to prepare
the plans and specifications for the above-mentioned two primary
clarifiers and appurtenances at Plant No. 2.
3: The staff be directed to expedite the completion of this project
on or before July 16, 1976, in order that the General Manager ~ay
collect a bet of $5,00 from the Director of Finance, '
. REL:hje
Item No. 3 t;QUNTY ::SANITATION UISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
ST AF F REPORT
July 24, 1975
P.O. BOX 8127
108"44 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71 .. ) 5.C0-2910
(71 .. ) 962-2.C I I
Subject: Selection of Engineering Services for Improvements at Plant No. 2
In order to implement the program for improvement of facilities at Plant No. 2,
it will be necessary to retain the services of certain consulting engineers.
There are basically three areas on. which staff will need assistance in the
implementation of the facilities as set forth in the CORF budget as presented
in June of this year. Services as required for the various areas are as follows:
.L BROOKHURST STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND REALIGNMENT OF MAIN ENTRANCE
ROADWAY
This improvement, which is estimated to cost in excess of $150,000,
will require the services of a consulting engineer to coordinate
the survey s~orm drain requirements in with the design for the
project. The staff feels that there are several competent consulting
engineers that can perform the tasks as required, and it is recom-
mended that the staff be directed to solicit proposals from those
qualified engineers and make a recommendation to the Boards for the
selection thereof.
2. RELIABILITY OF TREATMENT FACILITIES
It: is contemplated that the staff will p·repare the necessary
specifications and bid documents for the procurement of the
equipment necessary for the additional two primary clarifiers,
but it will be necessary to retain the services of John Carollo
Engineers for the design of the facilities and the necessary
piping and appurtenances associated with this project. It is
the staff's recommendation that the Boards authorize negotiations
between the staff and John Carollo Engineers for this work. It
is felt that John Carollo Engineers is-most familiar with this
add-on and remodeling project and would best serve the Districts.
3. FOUL AIR SCRUBBER AT IIEADWORKS "C" (at Plant No. 2)
REL:hje
In the continuation of our odor control program to abate nuisances
associated with the treatment processes, it will be necessary to
treat the foul air in the Hcadworks by the installation of a foul
air scrubber. It is, therefore, recommended that the staff solicit
_proposals from those consulting engineers who are qualified in this
area and can demonstrate their expertise and recommend the selection
of a qualified engineer for this project.
....
I
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION of· SANITATION AGENCIES
H:2;) L Stret>I Suite SGO Sacramento. Ca. 9G81-1
Telephone (916) 444 -2796
TO: ALL MANAGERS AND DIRECTORS
FROM:
SUBJECT:
HIKE DILLON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING LEGISLATION
DATE: July 17, 1975
The July 3 issue of the CASA newsletter brought you up to date on the status of the
major collective bargaining bills. SB 275 Dills, because of a "bad reputation", is
now SB 4 Dills. AB 119 Dixon is an identical bill on the Assembly side. Both bills
did not meet the initial committee deadlines and technically cannot become law prior
to January 1, 1977.
Following are the major provisions of SB 4 Dills as amended:
Existing laws are repealed and a single uniform "collective bargaining" law is
establi~hed for all public employees.
Contains a statement of recognition that a distinction exists between public
agencies and private industry, and that private sector precedent shall therefore
not necessarily be binding.
Managerial and confidential employees are excluded from the act. Supervisory
employees are accorded limited rights under the George Brown Act separate from
non-supervisory personnel.
A five-member Public Employment Relations Board together with staff is established
to administer the new law, determining bargaining units, unfair labor practices,
etc.
Limited judicial review is provided in certain instances.
Both parties are required to bargain in good faith prior to the employer finalizing
his budget.
Initial employee proposals shall be a public record and the employer's counter-
proposal and any new proposals must be made public within 24 hours. {Fishbowl
amendment}
Contains provisions for exclusive representation and organizational security and
dues deduction. Organizational security is limited to agency shop and maintenance
of membership.
The bill provides that the collective ·bargaining agreement may include a procedure
for final and binding arbitration of rights disputes {grievances) if agreed to by
the parties. If included, such agreements may be enforced through court order.
For impasse, either party, or the board, may declare that an i.mpasse has been ~·
reached in negotiations or the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement.
At the request of either party the board shall appoint a mediator to assist in
resolving an impasse. The mediator does not have the power to impose any settle-
ment on the parties.
The bill does not provide for reimbursement of local costs (SB 90) because
responsibilities imposed on local government by this Act are in lieu of similar
responsibilities imposed by existing law.
Scope of bargaining has been limited to wages, hours and other terms and condi-
tlons of employment.
Copies of SB 4 will be sent to CASA members upon request.
JOHN H. SAWYER, GENERAL M"NAGE.R
830 NORTH ROSS STREET
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701
(714) 935.3355
ASSOCIATION, INC.
• Board of Directors
AGENDA ITEM #15
August 12, 1975
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 75-127
Gentlemen:
The agenda for your regular meeting of August 13, 1975, contains
an item of importance to the Orange County Employees Association.
Item number 15 calls for the consideration of Resolution No. 75-127
on Employee Relations. This resolution will directly affect the
employees of the Districts whom we represent. It is important
that through OCEA your· employees be permitted to provide input
to the District on Resolution No. 75-127.
California Government Code Section 3507 provides that:
"A public agency may adopt reasonable rules and regulations
after.consultation in good faith with representatives of
an employee organization or organizations for the adminis-
tration of employer-employee relations under this chapter."
The consultation required by Section 3507 has not occurred. We
first heard of the proposed resolution when we received it in the
mail on August 11. Two days is not sufficient time to arrange a
meeting and fully explore this detailed document. Please suspend
consideration of this matter ~ntil your staff and general counsel
have consulted with the Orange County Employees Association as
mandated by the Government Code.
Sincerely,
ORANGE COUNTY EMPLOYEES l~SSOCINrION
·~9~
~'.1111';~ ~:_ ifarker
Staff Representative
JGH:rnm
cc: James Ellis, Fred Harper, Thomas Woodruff
REPRESENTING MORE THAN 7000 ORANGE COUNTY EMPLOYEES
AGENDA ITEM #15
RESOLUTION NO. 75-127
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
ESTABLISHING GUIDELINES FOR EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NOS. 69-99 AND 71-4
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. l, 2, 3, 5. 6, 7, and 11, of orange County, California
hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. TITLE OF RESOLUTION
This resolution shall be known as the Employer-Employee
Relations Resolution of the County Sanitation Districts Nos.
l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange county, California.
SECTION 2. PURPOSE
The purpose of this resolution is to implement Chapter
10, Division 4, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of
California (Sections 3500 et seq.), captioned "Public Employee
Organizatioris", by providing orderly procedures for the admin-
istration of employer-employee relations between the Districts
~nd its employees and for resolving disputes regarding wages,
hours and other terms and conditions of employment. This re-
sol~tion is intended to establish uniform and orderly methods
of communication between the Districts and their employees.
SECTION 3. DEFINITIONS
(A) DISTRICTS --means County Sanitation Districts Nos.
l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of orange County, Calif-
ornia, acting individually or in concert through
the Joint Administrative Organization.
(B) EMPLOYEE --means any person regularly employed by
the Districts except elected officials.
(C) EMPLOYEE, CONFIDENTIAL --means any employee who,
in the regular course of his duties, has access to,
-1-
\
<
r
or possesses information relating to, deci~ions of
the Districts' management, affecting employer-
employee relations.
(D) EMPLOYEE, MANAGEMENT means any employee who
formulates, determines, or administers management
policies and programs including, but not limited to,
all employees listed in Exhibit A, attached hereto.
(E) EMPLOYEE, PROFESSIONAL --means any employee engaged
in work requiring scientific or specialized knowledge
or skills attained through a recognized course of
study and instruction.
(F) EMPLOYEE, SUPERVISORY --means any employee having
authority to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall,
promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline
other employees, or responsibili_ty to direct them,
or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to
recorn.mend such action, if in connection with the
foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of
a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires
the use of independent judgment, including, but not
limited to, all employees listed on Exhibit B,
attached hereto.
(G) EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION means any organization
which includes employees of the Districts and which
has as one of its primary purposes representing such
employees in their employer-employee relations.
(H) EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS --means the relation-
ship between the Districts and its employees or their
employee organizations concerning wages, hours, and
other terms and conditions of employment.
(I) IMPASSE --means a deadlock in the discussions
between a recognized employee organization and the
Districts over any matter concerning, which they are
-2-
required to meet and confer in good faith, or over
the scope of such subject matter.
(J) MEDIATION means the effort of an impartial third
person functioning as an intermediary, to assist the
parties in reaching a voluntary resolution to an
impasse, through interpretation, suggestion and advice.
(K) MEET AND CONFER IN GOOD FAITH --means the perfor-
mance by Di~tricts, or its duly authorized represen-
tatives, and representatives of recognized employee
organizations of their mutual obligation to meet
and confer in order to exchange freely information,
opinions, and proposals, and to endeavor to reach
agreement on matters within the scope of represen-
tation. This does not compel either party to agree
to a proposal or to make a concession.
(L) RECOGNITION --means acknowledgement by the Districts
General Manager that an employee organization is the
exclusive representative of all the employees in an
ap~ropriate unit, except employees in such unit who
have elected to represent themselves.
(M) RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION --means an employee
organization which has been granted recognition by
the Districts General Manager and the employee or-
ganization which has th.e right to meet and confer in
good faith as the exclusive organizational represen-
tative of all members of an appropriate unit except
those members in such unit who elect to represent
themselves.
(N) SCOPE OF REPRESENTATION --means all matters relating
to employment conditions and employer-employee re-
lations, including, but not limited to, wages, hours
and.other terms and conditions of employment.
Districts' rights, as defined in Section 5 herein,
-3-
' ..
r -
are excluded from the scope of representation.
SECTION 4. EMPLOYEE RIGHTS
(A) Employees have the right to form, join and participate
in the activities of employee organizations of their
own choosing for the purpose of representation on all
matters of employee relations.
(B) Employees have the right to refrain from joining or
participating in the activities of employee organi-
zations.
(C) Employees have the right at any time to represent
themselves individually in their employee relations.
(D) Neither the Districts, nor any employee organization,
nor any employee, shall interfere with, intimidate,
re.strain, coerce, or discriminate against any employee
or employees because of the rights guaranteed here-
under.
(E)· Managerial and confidential employees who are members
of.a recognized employee organization which represents
employees who are not managerial or confidential
employees shall not:
(1) represent the employee organization on matters
within the scope of representation, or
(2) serve on committees of a recognized employee
organization which represents ·employees who
are not managerial or confidential employees at
the times such committee considers matters under
which this e~ployee has managerial control or
has knowledge about as a confidential employee.
(F) Supervisory employees who are members of a recognized
employee organization which represents employees who
are not supervisory employees shall not serve as
representatives of such organizations in any stage of
the grievance procedure.
-4-
\
<
(G) Professional employees have the right to be represented
separately from non-professional employees by a pro-
fessional employee organization consisting of such
professional employees.
(H) Nothing herein shall be construed to give employees
the right to strike, and any employee who encourages,
causes or participates in any strike, walkout, stoppage
or retarding of work, or any other interference with
the conduct of the Districts' operations, shall be
subject to irmnediate discharge or other disciplinary
action in the. sole discretion of the District.
SECTION 5. DISTRICTS' RIGHTS
Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Resolu-
tion, or subsequent ones, the Districts have and retain the sole
and exclusive rights and functions of managements, including,
but not limited to, the following:
·(A) To determine the nature and extent of services to be
performed, as well as the right to determine and
implement its public function and responsibility.
(B) To manage all facilities and operations of the
Districts, including the methods, means and personnel
by which the Districts' operations are to be conduct-
ed.
(C) To schedule working hours, allot and assign work.
(D) To establish, modify or change work schedules or
standards.
(E) To direct the working forces, including the right to
hire, promote, demote, or transfer any employee.
(F) To determine the location of all plants and facilities.
(G) To determine the layout and the machinery, equipment
or materials to be used.
(H) To determine processes, techniques, methods and means
of all operations, including changes or adjustments
-5-
r
of any machinery or equipment.
(I) To determine the size and composition of the working
force.
(J) To determine policy and procedures affecting the
selection or training of new employees.
(K) To establish, assess and implement employee perfor-
mance standards, including·, but not limited to,
• quality and quantity standards; the assessment of
employee performances; and the procedures for said
assessment.
(L) To control and determine the use and location of
Districts' property, material, machinery or equipment.
(M) To schedule the operation of and to determine the
number and duration of shifts.
(N) To determine safety, health and property protection
measures.
(0) To transfer work from one job to another or from one
plant or unit to another.
(P) To .introduce new, improved or different methods of
.operations, or to change existing methods.
(Q) To ~elieve employees from duty for lack of work or
other reasons deemed legitimate by management.
(R) To reprimand, suspend, discharge or otherwise
discipline employees fo.r cause. The judgment of
management shall govern except for an abuse of dis-
cretion.
(S) T.o establish and determine job classifications.
(T) To take such other and further action as may be nee-
essary to organize and operate the Districts in the
most efficient and economical manner and in the
best interest of the public it serves.
(U) To contract or subcontract construction, services,
maintenance, distribution or any other work with
-6-
. '·
outside public or private.entities.
{V) The exercise of management rights shall not preclude
-~ employees or recognized employee organizations from
presenting grievances concerning the effect of said
action upon the employees~ provided, however, the
basic right of management to act hereunder or make
such decisions is unimpaired.
SECTION 7. PETITION FOR RECOGNITION. THE RIGHT TO MEET AND
CONFER IN GOOD FAITH.
{A) An employee organization that seeks recognition for
the purpose of meeting and conferring in good faith
as the representative of all the employees in an
appropriate unit shall file a petition with the
DistrictsGeneral Manager containing the following
information and documentation:
{l) Name and address of the employee organization •
. (2) Names and titles of its officers.
(3) Names of employee organization representatives
who are authorized to speak on behalf of its
members.
(4) A statement that the employee organization has,
as one of its primary purposes, representing
employees in their employment relations with the
Districts.
(5) ·A statement whether the employee organization
is a chapter or local of, or affiliated directly
or indirectly in any manner with, a regional,
state, national or international organization
and, if so, the name and address of each such
regional, state, national or international or-
ganization.
(6) Certified copies of the employee organization's
constitution and by-laws.
-7-
'
r
(7) A designation of those persons, not exceeding
two in number, and their addresses, to whom
notice by regular United States mail will be
deemed sufficient notice on the employee or-
ganization for any purpose.
(8) A statement that the employee organization
recognizes that the provisions of Section 923
of the California Labor code are not applicable
to Districtsemployees, and that the organization
does not and will not assert the right to call,
engage ~n, encourage, assist or condone, in any
manner, any strike, work stoppage, slow down,
sick in, or other concerted refusal to work by
employees of the Districts.
(9) A statement that the employee organization has
no restriction on membership based on race, color,
creed, sex, age or national origin.
(10) The job classifications or titles of employees
in the unit claimed to be appropriate and the
number of member employees therein.
(11) A statement that the employee organization has
in its possession written proof, dated within
six months of the date upon which the petition
is filed, to establish that a majority of the
employees in the unit claimed to be appropriate,
have designated the employee organization to
represent all employees in such unit in their
employment relations with the Districts. Such
written proof shall be submitted for confirmation
to the Districts General Manager.
(12) A request that the Districts General Manager
recognize the employee organization as the
representative of all of the employees in the
unit claimed to be appropriate for the purpose
-8-
of meeting and conferring in good faith on all
matters within the scope of representation.
(B) Upon the determination by the Districts General
Manager that an employee organization has complied
with the requirements of (A) above and {F) below,
he may grant recognition for purposes of meeting and
conferring in good faith after determining the majority
•
status of the petitioner by either:
(1) Having a secret ballot election conducted by
the State of California Conciliation Service, or
(2) By any other reasonable method based upon written
proof executed within the pre~eding six months.
(C) Only one employee organization shall be granted re-
cognition as the recognized employee organization,
entitled to meet and confer in good faith within the
scope of repr~sentation, for employees in an appro-
priate unit with the exception of self-represented
employees.
(D) DURATION OF RECOGNITION. When an employee organization
. has been recognized, such recognition shall remain in
effect until such time as the recognized employee
organization is decertified or the appropriate unit
represented by such recognized employee organization
is modified, as provided in Section 8.
(E) RESTRICTION ON REPRESENTATION. No employee shall be
represented by more than one recognized employee
organization.
(F) APPROPRIATENESS OF UNITS. The Districts General
Manager, after reviewing the petition filed by an
employee organization seeking recognition, shall
determfne whether the proposed unit is an appropriate
unit. The principal criterion in making this determin-
ation is whether there is a community of interest
-9-
. '·
r·
among such employees. The following factors among
others, are to be considered in making such determin-
ation:
(1) Which unit will assure employees the fullest
freedom in the exercise of rights set forth
under this resolution.
(2) The history of employee relations in the unit,
among other employees of the Districts and in
similar public employment.
(3) The effect of the unit on the efficient operation
of the Districts and sound employer-employee
relations.
(4) The extent to which employees have common skills,
working conditions, job duties or similar
educational requirements.
(5) The effect on the existing classification
structure of dividing a single classification
among two or more units.
Provided, however, no unit shall be es-
~ablished solely on the basis of the extent to which employees
in the proposed unit have organized.
SECTION 8. DECERTIFICATION OF RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATIONS.
(A) A petition for decertification alleging that a recog-
niz~d employee organization is no longer entitled to
represent all of the employees in an appropriate unit
may be filed with the Districts General Manager. The
petition for dece~tification may be filed by an
employee, a group of employees or their representatives,
or an employee organization. The petition, including
all accompanying documents, shall be verified. rt
may be accompanied by a petition for recognition by
a challenging organization. The petition for decer-
tification shall contain the following information:
-10-
(1) The name, address and telephone number of the
petitioner and a designated representative
authorized to receive notice or requests for
further information.
(2) The name of the recognized employee organization.
(3) An allegation that the recognized employee
organization is no longer entitled to represent
all of the employees in the appropriate unit,
and any other relevant and material facts.
(4) Written proof that at least thirty percent of
the employees in the unit do not desire to be
representeq by the recognized employee organi-
zation. Such written proof shall be dated within
six months of the date upon which the petition
is filed and shall be submitted for confirmation
to the Districts General Manager or to a mutually
agreed upon disinterested third party.
(B) MODIFICATION OF ESTABLISHED UNIT. A petition for
modification of an established unit may be filed by
an employee organization with the Districts General
Manager during the same period for filing a petition
for decertification, and petitipn for modification
shall contain the following information:
(1) The name, address and telephone number of the
petitioner and a designated representative author-
ized to receive notices or requests for further
information.
(2) The name of the recognized employee organization
that currently represents the employees in the
established unit.
(3) An allegation that the established unit is no
longer appropriate and all relevant facts in
-11-
support of such allegations.
(4) Written proof that at least thirty'percent of
the employees within the proposed unit have
designated the petitioning employee organization
to represent them in their employment relations
with the Districts.
The Districts General Manager shall determine the appropriate
•
unit which may be the existing, the proposed-modified unit, or
some other appropriate unit.
After the Districts General Manager determines the appropriate
unit arising out of the operation of this section, he shall then
follow.the procedures set forth in Section 7. for determining
recognition rights in such unit.
(C) There shall be no more than one election in any one
unit in any twelve month period.
(D) In any electi.on held pursuant to this resolution, the
result thereof shall be determined by a majority of all
employees in the unit eligible to vote in such election.
SECTION 9. MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
(A) . TERMS AND CONDITIONS. All matters of employer-
employee relations within the scope of representation
for all employees in any unit represented by a
recognized employee organization, or any individual
employee representing himself, shall remain the same
from year to year unless on or before September 1 of
the. calendar year 1975, and September of each calendar
year thereafter, proposals in writing identifying the
areas.within the scope of representation to be covered
in negotiations are filed with the Districts General
Manager by such recognized employee organization, or
such individual employee.
(B) APPROVAL OF. If agreement is reached by and between
the Districts General Manager and the recognized
-12-. ..
employee organization, on matters within the scope
of representation, they shall jointly prepare a
written memorandum of agreement, which shall then be
submitted to the Districts Boards of Directors. Said
agreement shall not be binding, nor of any force or
effect, unless and until approved by the Districts
Boards of Directors.
SECTION 10. IMPASSE
(A) If, after a reasonable period of time, the Districts
General Manager and the representatives of the re-
cognized employee organization have exhausted all
possible means qf reaching agreement, either party
may, by written communication to the other, request
mediation. Within ten calendar days after receipt of
the written request, the parties.shall request the
California State Conciliation Service to appoint a
mediator. If the mediator is unable to resolve the
impasse, all unresolved issues shall be submitted to
the Districts Boards of Directors which retains the
right and responsibility of final decisions regarding
wages, fringe benefits, hours, and all other terms
and conditions of employment.
SECTION 11. NOTICE
(A) Except in cases of emergency, the Districts shall
give reasonable, written notice to each recognized
employee organization of any ordinance, rule, resolu-
tion or regulation directly relating to matters
within the scope of representation proposed to be
adopted by the Districts, and shall provide such
recognized employee organization the opportunity to
meet with the Districts.
SECTION 12. PEACEFUL PERFORMANCE
(A) Any employee organization which, directly or indirectly
-13-
by any means whatsoever, engages in, induces, condones
or .encourages any employee to engage in a strike, sick
in, walkout, stoppage, or retarding of work, or any
other interference with the conduct of the Districts
operations, shall lose all rights hereunder, including
but not limited to, suspension or revocation of
recognition, cancellation of payroll deductions, pro-
hibition of access to work or duty stations and
bulletin boards.
SECTION 13. CONSTRUCTION
(A) The Districts Boards of Directors may adopt such rules
and regulations_ necessary or convenient to implement
the provisions of this resolution and of Chapter 10,
Division 4, Title 1 of the Government Code of the
State of California. Nothing in this resolution shall
be construed to deny any person or employee any rights
granted by Federal or State laws. The rights, powers
and authority of the Districts Boards of Directors in
all matters, including the right to maintain any legal
action, shall not be modified or restricted by this
re~olution.
(B) If any provision or portion thereof contained in this
resolution, or the application thereof, to any person
or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, invalid,
or unenforceable, the remainder of this resolution and
the application of such provision, or portion thereof,
to other persons or circumstances shall be deemed
severable, shall not be affected, and shall remain
in full force and effect.
(C) The provisions of this resolution shall supersede and
take precedence over the provisions of any prior
resolutions, minute orders or statements of policy
-14-
by the Districts Boards of Directors dealing with the
same subjects and matters as are covered herein,
including, but not limited to, Resolution Nos.
69-99 and 71-4.
(D) Whenever written notice is required by this resolu-
tion, such notice shall deem to have been received on
the day immediately following the day on which it was
mailed (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays on
which the offices of the Districts are closed) pro-
vided the same was sent by first class or certified
mail, postage prepaid to the Districts at 10844 Ellis
Avenue, Fountain Valley, California 92708, or to any
employee organization at its last address furnished
to the Districts.
SECTION 14
The Secretary of the Boards of Directors is hereby directed
tc certify to the passage cf this resolution and thereupon and
thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect.
-15-
MANAGERIAL EMPLOYEES
General Manager
Chief Engineer
Director of Finance
Superintendent
EXHIBIT "A"
•
\
<
;
·~
SUPERVISOR~ EMPLOYEES
Procurement and Property Chief
Principal Accountant
Senior Engineer
Operations.Engineer
Chief of Industrial Waste
Resources Management Engineer
Senior Facilities Supervisor
Senior Accountant
Systems Accountant
Associate Engineer
Chief Operator
Facilities Supervisor
Laboratory Director
Purchasing Supervisor
Assistant Engineer
Environmental Specialist
Plant Maintenance Supervisor
Senior Engineering Associate
EXHIDIT "B"
• \
<
MEET I NG DATE August 1 3 , 1975 TI ME 7:30 p.m . DISTRICTS 1.2,3,5,6,7,11
DISTRICT 1 ~'~ ~JOINT BOARDS
RIMA .•.••. ~ .:i__ _j.__ 'DIEDR~CH) •••• ·BATTIN···· _k:::_ .::/__ ~
"'==EVANS .•••.... GARTHE • .• · ~ .:/___ ..::J___
SHARP .•.•.•.. SALTARELLI-~ .J___ ..::/---
AMO • · · · · · · · ~ __ .
DIEDRICr) •••.• BATTIN •·••• ~ ~
ANTHONY •.••.. BURTON·····~~
COLLI~S ••••.. BYRNE·······~~
LYONS .••••••. CALLAHAN···~~
EWING ••••••. ·CHAPUT······~ __
DIEDRICH) .•••• CLARK······· ~ __ DISTRICT 2
L VONS • • · • · • • ·CALLAHAN· • • _L_ ----1:L ..::J.._ HOMR I GHAUSEN) .-€&*-· • • • • • · · ~ --
EWING ••• ·····CHAPUT·····~ __ ..> _j__ CULVER· •.•.. ~ __
DIEDRIC)H). ···.CLARK.····· ..L_ ..::J__ ...::L_ GRIFFIN) •••••• DAVIS·······~ __
GARTtlE ·······EVANS.·····~--~ -1--MC INNIS). •.•• DOSTAL······ v :l~l#SI THO~) ...•..... KAYWOOD ••• ·~ _____bl_ _j___ GIBBS) ••..•.•• DUKE······ •• k""'" --
FOX).········ ·M AC KAIN.·· V""' __tL _1._ GARTHE) ••.•••. EVANS······· """" --
PERRY.····· cµ ~ ~ MAC K!IN) .•.•• FOX ••••••• •• ----V---
ISVALSTAD). ····S COTT.·····~ j__ _:t_ SONJU ••••••.. FRANKIEWICH. ~ --
PEREZ)· • • • • • • · rEf:lfll LE. • • · • ~ .:/..__ 3.-EVANS .••.•.. GARTHE. • • • . . '-"'" --DUNN~) .•••••.• WINN ..•••.. ~..:{__ _j__ WIEDER} •••••.. GIBBS ••••••• .,.......---
WARD)··· • • • · ··WOOD. • • · • • · t..;""' __ N ..::f__. GLOCKNER.. • . ~ --
GRAHAM).······ YOUNG.····· ~____bl~ NEVIL) ••••... GRAHAM •.•.•• V""" --
TEMPl-Ej ••.•••. JAC-Kt1AH. • • • • 0---
DISTRICT 3 THO~) ••••••.•• KAYWOOD ••••• ~ ~
(HOMRIGHAUSEN)·Ge*········ ~ ::/___ ~ FOX) •• ~ ••••••• MAC KAIN •.•• ____k::::_ ====
AMO........ v __tL _:J__ RYCOFF J. ~ ••••• MC I NPH-S •••• ~ __
(COLL I NS) ••.••• BYRNE~~ V"" --\\L ..::L-BLACKMANJ ..... MC KNEW... • . v __
CULVER·. . . . v-j_ _j_ PERRY •••••.• ~ __
GRIFFIN)···· .. J;l,A>/JS •••••• ~ __ N _j__ (DIEDRICH).··· ·RILEY·······~ __
GARTHE) · · · · · • · EVANS· • · · · · ~ ___M_ __:j__ RIMA. . . • • • • • ~ __
MAC K!IN). ····FOX········ ~ L,_ ±= ROGERS •••••• C\.-__
SONJU • · · • · · · • FRANKIEWICH ~ !i_ SHARP). •.••..• SALTARELLI..~ __
NEVIL-········GRAHAM·····~ .:i..._ DIEDRICH) ..••. SCHMIT •.•••• ~ __
THOM)········· KAYWOOD.··· ~ ___hl_ .i--SVALSTAD) ...•• SCOTT .•.•••• ~ --
BLACKMAN).···· MC KNEW.· .• ~ .:;;__ _::/__ •.•.... --SllIPLE¥. • · • ·-=-__
DIEDRJCH) •••.• SCHMIT •.... ~~~ MC INNIS) .•••• STORE ·· ·••·• ~ __
GIBBS).······. SiilPPLE'r. · .. ~ 1_ _i__ STANTON) •..• ·· SVALSTAD · · • · ~ __
STANTON).· · · •• SVALSTAD .•• ---l.L-_N _ _:j__ PER El) ••..••.• KMPLE· · · • · · ~ __
wooD) •..••..•• wARn .•••... --1.:::::::.----1::l_ ....:i___ woonJ •••••••.• wARD ···· •••• ...---__
ARBISO) •..•••• WEISHAUPT. ~ ~ ~ ARBISQ) •••••.• WEISHAUPT· .• __J.:::::::_ __
DUNN~) •..••... WINN········ v"' __
DISTRICT 5 WARD) .....•... woon ....•... ,,..---
v GRAHAM) .•••••. YOUNG······. ~ ==== RYCKOFF • • · • · · t4C ItHH g.. . ~ _N _ _L__
DIEDRICH).···· RILEY~~ v-_µ_ ~
ROGERS.... 0-~ 0..... OTHERS
DISTRICT 6 ~~~c~~TER ~~i E~~ ~ ~~ ~: : : . . STO~ ~ ~·~ ..• --{7-=1-~, '~~~==-----======--=~L =EW:::I:::::::S:::::::::==-:==:::=:::=:~--
DISTRICT
~(EVANs >'
rNTW 1-f) I p
(M r
I
MEET I NG DATE August 13, 1975 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1.2,3,5,6,7,11
DISTRICT 1 ~'~ ~~JOINT BOARDS
RIMA •••••. ~ 1--_y__ 'DIEDR~CH) ••••• BATTIN.··· ~ :i__ ~
EVANS •••••••• GARTHE •• • • ~ L_ .::J__ ~SHARP ........ SALTARELLI-~ .J___ ~
DISTRICT 2
AMO • • • • • • • • ~ -·
DIEDRICr) ••••• BATTIN ••••• ~ ____
ANTHONY •••••• BURTON·····~ ____
COLLI~S •••••• BYRNE·······~ ____
LYONS •••••••• CALLAHAN···~ ____
EWING •••••••• CHAPUT······~ ___
DIEDRICH) ••••• CLARK·······~ __
LYONS • • • • • • • ·CALLAHAN· • • ~ __ll _:f.__ HOMR I GHAUSEN) .-Ee*-· • · · • · · · ~ --
EWING ••• • • • ··CHAPUT····· ~ __ ..> _::/__ CULVER· ••••• ~
DIEDRICH)· • • • ·CLARK.· • • • • ~ .::f__ _:i__ GRIFFIN) •••••• E>l\"I S, •••••• ~ --
GARTtfE) • • • • • • ·EVANS· • • • • • ~ --~ _:t._ Mc 1 NN Is) ••••• DOSTAL· • • • • • v -"~1 THO~) ••••••••• KAYWOOD •••• ~ ~ _j__ GIBBS) •••••••• DUKE········,,......... --
FOX)· · • • • ·····MAC KA IN· • • ~ __H_ -3._ GARTHE) ••••••• EVANS··· • • • • .......----
PERRY.····· o.., ~ ~ MAC K1IN). •••• FOX ..... •••• -V --
PEREZ)········ FEMI' LE.···· ~ :i__ .:::J__ EVANS ••••••• GARTHE...... ~ --!SVALSTAD) ·····SCOTT.····· v' ::L_ _j__ SONJU •••••••• FRANKIEWICH. ~ --
DUNNE).······ -WINN.······~ _:J__ _j__ WIEDERJ ••••••• GIBBS ••••••• "1" --
WARD)········· WOOD.······ .._,....... __ N _j__, GLOCKNER •••• ~ --
GRAHAM)· • • • • • • YOUNG. • • • • • ~ ____.b\ ~ NEV IL) ••••••• GRAHAM. • • • • • ~ --
TEMPL-EJ. •••••• JACKMAN. • • • • 0---
DJ STR JCT 3 THO~) ••••••••• KAYWOOD ••••• ~ --
(HOMRIGHAUSEN)·&e*······ •• ~ ::/___ :J__ FOX) •• ~ ••••••• MAC KAIN •••• ~==
AMO •••••••• ~ __H._ i_ RYCOFF J. ~ ••••• P4C I NtU75. • • • ...,...----__
(COLL I NS) •••••• BYRNE~~~ ~ _::£___ BLACKMANJ ••••• MC KNEW. • • • • V' __
CULVER· •••• ~ .j__ _j__ PERRY .•••••• -0:-__
GRIFFIN).····· QAVIS· ••••• ___.L __ N _i__ (DIEDRICH)····· RILEY··.·· •• ~ __
GARTHE). ······EVANS······ ~ __.hL _:f__ RIMA........ ~ __
MAC K~IN). ····FOX········ ~ L_ ±= ROGERS •••••• 0.-__
SONJU • • • • • • • • FRANKIEWICH ~ !i__ SHARP) •••••••• SALTARELLI..~ __
NEVIL-········GRAHAM·····~ :i__ DIEDRICH) ••••• SCHMIT •••••• ~ __
THOM)········· KAYWOOD.··· ~ ~ j__ SVALSTAD). •••• SCOTT ••••••• ~ __
BLACKMAN).···· MC KNEW •••• ~ :j_ .Y__ ........ SH I PLE¥ ••••• -=--__
DIEDRJCH) ••••• sCHMIT ••••• ~ ~ ~ MC INNIS) ••••• sTORE······· ..lt::::::_ --
GIBBS).······· ~lfxPLE't, • •• ___),£_ _:j__ _:i_ STANTON) •••••• SVALSTAD· • • • -&L:..-__
STANTON).····· SVALSTAD ••• ~ _N _ _:i_ PEREi) •••••••• KMPLE·. · •. • J:::::::. __
wooD) ••••••••• wARD ••••••• _J.::::::::_ ---1::L _y_ wooDJ ••••••••• wARD········ __i:::::::::_ __
ARBISO) ••••••• WEISHAUPT. ~ ~ _.li::__ ARBISO) ••••••• WEISHAUPT··· -k:::.-__
DUNNE)· • • • • • ··WINN· • • • • • • • V" __
DISTRICT 5 WARD)' •••••••• WOOD. ' • • • • • • ,_,,.--~ ) v GRAHAM) ....... voUNG·······~ == RYCKOFF ······MC HHH~ ·. ~ _N_ -L-
DI EDRICH) ••••• RILEY~~ ~ -~-.:L__
ROGERS •••• 0...-~ ~ OTHERS
DISTRICT 6
(MC INN Is) ••••• STORE •••••• ~ _j__ -f-
(D I EDR I CH) ••••• BATTIN • • • • • V ..::i--
R I MA • • • • • • • V ::t--r_
DISTRICT 7
(EVANS) • • • • • •• GARTHE ••••• __JiC_ .:i__ L_
NTHONY) • • • • • BURTON • • • • • ~ ~ _::J__ ~IEDRICH) • • • • CLARK • • • • • __k:'_ J..__ _j__
(MC INNIS)···· DOSTAL·····~ j__ _:j__
GLOCKNER • • • v-L_ _:j__
(TEMPLE) • • • • • • JACKMAN • • •• 0-~ ·~
(SHARP)······· SALTARELLI • ~ _j__ L._
DISTRICT 11
DIEDRJCH .... SCHMIT-~~ 0-~
GIBBS) ••••••• DUKE~ •••• ~~~
WI EDER) •.•••• GIBBS •••••• ____aL: ~ ~
5/29/75
HARPER
SYLVESTER
LEWIS
CLARKE
TAYLOR
BROWN
WOODRUFF
EWING
HOHENER
HOWARD
HUNT
KEITH
KENNEY
LYNCH
MADDOX
MARTINSON
PIERSALL
STEVENS
ME ET I NG DATE August 13, 19 7 5 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11
DISTRICT 1 1~, ru u
../' J. __':j_._ , RIMA ••• vJ· -;r--~-v lJIEDR~CH) ••••• BATTIN.·.· ------
GA \/ -" EVANS ••••••• • RTHE • • • • ------
1sHARP •••••••• SALTARELLI.__:!___..,. __ J_
DISTRICT 2
L VONS • • • • • • • ·CALLAHAN· • • _.; ___ -_ ____:!__
EWING •••••••• CHAPUT ••••• ' · ~
DIEDRICH) ••••• CLARK •••••• v ~ _ ~
GART~E} ••••••• EVANS •••••• I -/
THO~} ••••••••• KAYWOOD •••• v ~ ./,
F 0 X } • • • • • • • • • • MAC KA I N • • • I -./
PER RY • • • • • • -a;--'.-, ---C::
!
SVALSTAD) ····.SCOTT •••••• --; -..t--..1-
PER EZ) • • • • • • • • "FEMPLE:"". • • • / _: ~··.
DUNNt:). ······-WINN....... .; .J_ __L
WARD} ••••••••• WOOD •• ) :e .. -,;---JtJ · .. _ .,
GRAHAM) ••••••• YOUNG. ~ ••• --:;t -(J.t· ----
DISTRICT 3
(HOMRIGHAUSEN). ~. • ••••• _L_ _-l __ v_
AMO. • • • • • • • J -~
(COLLINS) •• ····BYRNE······ ~ -v
CULVER· • • • • / ;.-" GRIFFIN).·····~ •••• ~ ~ "
GARTHE)· ······EVANS······ ~--__ -_.1_
MAC ~IN) ••••• FOX· ••••••• _ri __ ..; __ .,_
SONJU • • • • • • • • FRANKIEWICH J ~ v
NEVI~ ········GRAHAM····· _L ~ ·'
THOM).········ KAYWOOD •••• _v ___ -_.;_
BLACKMAN) •• ••• MC KNEW •••• _./ __ -' __ v_
DI EDRJ CH) ••••• SCHMIT. • • • • c._ -,_ _.c,_
GI BBS)· • • • •••• SHtPtE-¥. . • . -,,.. ---L-..1
STANTON) •••••• SVALSTAD ••• -"-----v-
WOOD) ••••••••• WARD ••••••• -.1-----.... -
ARB I SO) ••••••• WEISHAUPT. v ~ v
DISTRICT 5
(RYCKOFF). • • • • -J4C INNIS;-•• _./ ___ -_.1_
(DIEDRICH). • • • • RI LEY • • • • • " -" ROG~RS •••• "-==== ~-
DISTRICT 6
(MC INN Is) ••••• STORE •••••• --7--~--"'-
(DIEDRICH) ••••• BATTIN .•••• __ -~--"-
R I MA • • • • • •• _V'_ _-i_ _v_
DISTRICT 7
{EVANS) • • • •••• GARTHE ••••• _v __ .... __ _
NTHONY) • • • • • BURTON • • • • • -"-__ --__
"1rIEDRICH) • • • • CLARK ••••• _.1 __ ....!._ __ _
(MC INNIS) • • • • DOSTAL·· ·Ai· ..1 -~ ---
GLOCKNER 11
·"'· ~ _ _: __ _
(TEMPLt:) •••••• JA€1(ptlijf •••• --~-___ _
(SHARP}······· SALTARELLI • _.! __ -'-__ _
DISTRICT 11
DIEDRJCH •••• SCHMIT..... ~ 6--
GIBBS} ••••••• DUKE ••••••• -.;-~ -.;-
WIEDER) •••••• GIBBS •••••• --r-,... ./
DISTRICT 8
MITCHELL··· __ ----
(JOHNSoNi • • • • • HOLM •••••••
(DIEDRICH)···· RILEY •••••• --------
5/29/75
JOINT BOARDS
AMO • • • • • • • • 1
/ -·
DIEDRICr) ••••• BATTIN ••••• ~ ____
ANTHONY •••••• BURTON • • • • • -" __
COLLI ~S •••••• BYRNE·· • • • • • _v _ --
LYONS •••••••• CALLAHAN • • • _v __
EWING •••••••• CHAPUT· • • • • • _.; __
DIEDRICH) ••••• CLARK· • • • • • • _.; __ _
HOMR I GHAUSEN) .--eox-........ _J _ --
CULVER······ _I __ _
GRIFFIN) ••••• -BA'/IS.--· ·,t.'( · .I __
MC I NNI s) ..... DOSTAL.1~ • • ~
GIBBS) •••••••• DUKE····· • • • -./---
GARTHE) •••••• ·EVANS·· • • • • • -,---
MAC ~IN). •••• FOX ••••••••• -,,,---
SONJU •••••••• FRANKIEWICH. ~ ====
EVANS , ••••••• GARTHE •••••• ~
WI EDERJ ••••••• GIBBS ••••••• -./---
GLOCKNER •••• -,---
NEVIL),_;····· ·GRAHAM ...••• , ====
'FEM Pl-E • • • • • • • cJA€.Kt1AfL • • • • _,1--
TH O~J ••••••••• KAYWOOD ••••• ~ ====
FOX} •• ~ ••••••• MAC KA IN. • • • .;
RYCOFF J. ~ ••••• -Me--I NN-1 S •••• --;r --
BLACKMANJ ••••• MC KNEW ••••• __L_ ====
PERRY ••••••• -1t::_
(D I EDR I CH)· • • • ·RI LEY· • • • • • • _v_ ====
RIMA •••••••• _v __ _
ROGERS •••••• __&_ --
SHARP) •••••••• SALTARELLI •• _i_ __
DIEDRICH) ••••• SCHMIT •••••• --2:_ --
SVALSTAD). •••• SCOTT ••••••• -"· __ _
GIBBS)· • • •• • • • Sii I PLEY· • • • • -" __ _
MC INN Is)····· STORE······· -~-__
STANTON)·· ••• • SVALSTAD· ••• _v __ _
PER El)· • • • • • • • 'f-EMPLE· • • • • • ~ --
WOOD). • • • • ••• ·WARD· • • • • • • • __:!t._ __
ARB I so) ....... WE I SHAU PT. • • ~·
DUNNE}.······ -WINN········_.,., __ _
WARD} ••••••••• WOOD. • • • • • • • ~
GRAHAM) ••••••• YOUNG······· v ====
OTHERS
v
~
_v_
i/
-"-
. ./ ,,
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos.· 1, ~, 3, S, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour
of 7:30 p.m., August 13 , 1975 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California.
The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order
at 7:30 p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District's
Board.
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing temporary
increase in Petty
Cash authorization
* * * * * * * * *
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That a temporary increase of $600.00 in
the Petty Cash authorization be approved
to provide for expense advances for
Directors attending the Annual Conference of the California Association
of Sanitation Agencies in Monterey, August 20-23, 1975.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County,
California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true
and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on
the 13th day of August , 19 75 .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 13th day of August
19 75 .
S-107
Secretary of the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7, and 11
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour
of 7:30 p.m., August 13 , 1975, 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California.
The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order
at 7:30 p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District's
Board.
* * * * * * * * *
DISTRICT 7
Adjournment
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., August 20,
1975. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:57 p.m.,
August 13, 1975.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County,
California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true
and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on
the 13th day of August , 19 75 .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
1975.
b
S-107
day of August,
Boards of Directors
anitation Districts Nos.
, 6, 7, and 11
AUGUST 13, 1975 JOINT MTG.
·s-a) Report of the Joint Chairman
SUBSEQUENT TO THE LAST MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE,
I HAVE HAD DISCUSSIONS WITH MR. ImRPER RE ALTERNATIVES TO
THE DISTRICTS SPENDING OUR OWN MONIES TO ADD CLARIFIERS
THE
AT PLANT # 2, WE DECIDED A VISIT TO EPA REGIONAL OFFICE
MIGHT DEVELOP SOME OPTIONS NOT YET DISCUSSED.
AS A RESULT OF A MEETING WITH DICK CODDINGTON AND FRED
KREIGER OF THE EPA STAFF, THEY HAD CHECKED WITH THE REGIONAL
WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD AND FOUND THAT THEY MIGHT BE
OPEN TO SOME REVISIONS IN THE OCEAN DISCHARGE PERMIT LIMITS
PENDING FURTHER INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED BY US. AND,.ALSO
THAT ENFORCEMENT MIGHT NOT BE AS HARSH AS ANTICIPATED FOR
THE IMMEDIATE FUTURE WHICH WOULD GIVE US TIME TO COMPLETE
THE EIS EARLY NEXT YEAR. THE EPA GROUP INDICATED THAT EPA
ENFORCEMENT MIGHT FOLLOW THIS PATTERN, BUT COULD NOT COMMITT
SINCE THIS WAS A DIFFERENT DIVISION
WITH THIS INFORMATION, IT APPEARS THAT WE MIGHT DEFER THE
COMMITTMENT OF OUR MONIES UNTIL THE EIS IS COMPLETED AND
A
APPLY FOR GRANT NEXT YEAR.
ANOTHER POSSIBILITY DEVELOPED IN THAT EPA CAN UNDER CERTAIN
CONDITIO~S PULL OUT VARIOUS COMPONENTS OF A PROJECT FOR
GRANT APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE EIS COMPLETION. THE CLARIFIERS
MAY PBSSIBLY FALL INTO THIS CATEGORY. THE EIS WILL INVEST•
IGATE EARLY IN THE PROCESS A POTENTIAL FOR AN IMMEDIATE
PROJECT TO ELIMINATE CAPACITY PROBLEMS. AND I WAS ASSURED
THAT WITH THE DOUBLE TRACKING NOW IN PROC ESS ON THE JPL AND
CONVENTIAL SECON DARY TREATMENT SYSTEMS, THEY ARE KEE PING A
WATCHFULL EYE THE NEED S OF ORANGE CO. SANITAT I ON.
(6-b) Report of the General Mana ger
FAH reported on AMSA "208" Planning Conference in Williamsberg, Va. Between 75-100
attended from throughout the U.S. Rather interesting conference in that those
scheduled as speakers at the beginning of the conference remained throughout the
conference--Leon Billings, and Senator Muskie's man, and John Freshman(?) repre-
senting Senator Muskie. Our agency was the only local agency represented; however,
Bill Dendy, Executive Officer of the State Board, was there . General attitude of
conference was who needs planners to tell us how and where to build treatment plants.
All areas of the environment have to be considered; otherwise, they are going to
just freeze the money. Many people were confused during the conference about many
of the statements made . Bill Dendy stated that he felt that it was a step for
EPA to move around rules and regulations of the State. Thought his attitude changed
as stories were told. Regarding how important elected officials are, one of the
points was that they expect in the "208" planning effort there will be a lot of
participation at the local level and the decisions on what will be done will be
made by local officials. EPA is to keep their hands off. They are only to
determine that the process of examination of the environmental areas have been
looked into. Local officials are going to make the decisions. Mr. Harper commented
that he was impressed by Hampton Roads in Norco area?? They have a lot of growth
similar to here in Southern California. Their approach was very impressive. Said
he thought if we get involved in "208" Planning effort, it would be well to go back
and talk to some of those people.
Frances Wood then reported further on their meeting in Va. Agreed with Mr. Harper.
Said she thought Bill Dendy's attitude changed somewhat but not completely as to
how the "208" Planning should take place in Southern California. First attitude
very negative but before conference was over, talked to him for quite a while and
he is willing for us to prepare a coordinated plan to see how we are going to
handle the situation. After lawsuit, they said we are not going to have a non-
designated area . Now are willing to cooperate and hopefully we will be able to
put together a package and present it to Bill Dendy and see what kind of structure
should be used in Southern California to implement "208" Planning. Said we have
to follow problems at local areas. Up to us, as well as all other elected officials
in So. Ca., to decide what we are going to do. Are going to have to look at a
larger scope and scale to handle problems.
FAH said he was planning on attending a meeting the next morning with representatives
of LA County and City of LA to discuss some of the c0Dm1ents of Mr. Dendy. Said
we would probably be coming back to the Boards with some ideas of what has to be
don e .
Mr. Harper added that while in that area Al/5A directors h~d a meeting in Washington
and some of the top people in EPA have agreed to have AMSA Board be a committee
and discuss from time to time with EPA some of the problems we have in the major
agencies.
Regarding ad valorem tax, the administration has tried to get a bill in . Hasn't
been moving. Some of the staff people are opposed to ad valorem taxes for use
in revenue programs; however, did say this time that you better go back to your
Congressman and start there. In discussing this with Bill Dendy, have agreed to
support us with anything we want to do in California. Have asked Wayn e as President
of CASA to present to the membership in Monterey some type of resolution asking
some support on this ad valorem tax issue. Looking at one-half million per year
in additional operating costs to operate collection system once we get it put
together, and haven't improved water quality one bit.
Advised that SCCWRP has put out another annual report and anyone who would like
a copy, we will get them on the mailing list and have one sent to them. We only
h a ve a few copies .
-2-
(6-c) Report of the General CoWlsel
Said all the items he had to report on would be coming up on agenda late r.
Mentioned Orange Park Acres in District 7 and late claim on supplemental agenda.
Procedurally, it came in as a late claim and his recommendation is to refuse
to accept the late claim. No reasonable basis whatsoever why Sanitation Districts
named. A lot of other agencies are named and have been served for six months.
Referred to correspondence in folders from OCEA. Said he has discussed matter
with Mr . Harper and Employees Association and referred to his memorandum concerning
resolution. Basically, defined as housekeeping resolution to clean up self-contained
contradictions. Were certain challenges made on old resolution and we were
successful. However, in reviewing the litigation and existing resolution, felt
we should bring it a l~ttle bit more current. Because of delayed mail, OCEA hasn't
had a chance to review resolution and they have made a request for delay. Said
he wasn't sure we even had to discuss this resolution. Timing not critical but
desirable to commence on Sept. 1 payroll period for negotiations . Are no major
_c hanges on r es olution.
Consent Calendar items
~Questioned cutting back on coating. REL advised that requirement was tha t
epoxy coating is placed on top of galvanized coating . Epoxy will not adhere
to galvanized and would not be adequate coating . Still investigating but
feel this is a requirement that is redundant. Item moved and seconded and
/arried .
~) ~oint Chairman Winn stated that he would abstain from voting on this item
as he was a minority stockholder in this firm.
~b) Additional Primary Treatment at Plant 2
Chairman Winn suggested staff & Executive Committee be authorized to p rocee d.
L (l ~) Engineering proposal from JCE re two add'l clarifiers at Plant 2
/' Executive Committee recommended deferring ac tion on this item
(12-~Appointment of Building Committee ~ FAH advised that the first reason for e nlarging the Board Room is that we have
been having rather large groups and the limit is 81 people as f a r as the fire
code. In addition, we h a ve had some assignments that we would like to fill in
our personnel and we do not have adequate office faciliti e s or a place for them
to work. Several years a go we added on to the back of the building in the
Engineering Department with a loft of about 4500 sq . ft. that we have not
utilized. Would like to have Building Committee look at some of the needs and
report back to the Board. It was so moved & seconded & carried.
(12-e) SCCWRP Commissioner
Chairman Winn reported that he and Vice Chairman Gibbs met with Lindsley Parsons,
Commissioner to SCCWRP. His term expired earlier this year and we do n eed to
consider reappointment or another representative and alternate. Suggested that
any Director that might be interested and have some expertise along these lines
s hould submit a written request and resume to the Joint Chairman's .attention
and this will be considered a t the next meeting.
2-f) JPL Proce ss Report
RE L reported that State and EPA Project Report is presently being r evi ewed and
there is a meeting schedul ed for Tuesda y, Aug. 19, at which t ime the final
eva luation wil l be mad e wh ether we proce ed with co n stru ction of 1 MGD pi lot uni t
or conclude our efforts. At t h e present time, sti l l looks like it is a vi ab l e process .
Wi ll report back t o Bo ard. -3-
(13) JWS Report on Budgets
Super Sylvester does it again!
Svalstad had a question regarding how to read the forms to determine reserve
carry-over per year. JWS explained.
(14) Industrial Waste Ordinance
FAH advised that at the September meeting we will be presenting the actual
ordinance for the Boards' consideration and then will set date for public
hearing. Need no action at this time.
(15) Employee relations resolution No. 75-127
Tom Woodruff stated that he thought in view of the request of the OCEA and in
view of the fact that the Manager and staff will be meeting with OCEA the next
morning, and there is no crisis to have it adopted, K~ motion would be in
order to continue to next meeting. So moved , seconded & carried.
(16) City of Orange request for waiver of disposal fees
Svalstad asked why we were -recommending denial. FAH advised that we presently
have two existing agreements with Metropolitan Water District and with Wastewater
Disposal Company for the same type of discharge. This discharge is less than
5 million gallons so feel it would not be consistent to waive these fees when we
are collecting fees from two other entities.
Clark asked if it were true that when they were through building this, we are
going to buy this from them. Was answered yes. FAH said each of the Districts
are involved. Could cost City up to $6,000. Mr. Harper said it was estimated
somewhere in the neighborhood of 4 million gallons to discharge .
Perez indicated that letter requesting waiver is self-explanatory. Really robbing
Peter to pay Paul. The City of Orange ran into problems in trying to dispose of
subsurface water in the Handy Creek area and in order to expedite the project,
would like to avail ourselves of use of sewer to dispose of water. Would like
to ask for waiver to really decrease purchase price when the Districts purchase
the trunk. Said he tmderstood the argument that it may be in conflict to other
areas.
Yotmg asked if we charge Orange to discharge, are they going to tack it on to the
cost when we buy it back? Perez answered yes, is part of the construction activity.
FAH advised that all of the Districts would be paying for this, rather than just
District 7, because all Districts share in revenues on this type of discharge.
Clark said it is one government entity taking it from another and is just costing
the taxpayers. Would like to see us change this policy and be able to waive
these fees in dealing with various public entities. FAH stated that the staff
had no objection to this but we do have the two agreements. Advised that one of
the big problems for the City was that it would take 180 days to get a permit to
discharge 4 million gallons into Handy Creek.
Wood suggested that we make them stipulate that they would not charge us if we
waive the fees .
Clark reinterated that he would like to see this request for waiver of disposal
fees granted. Made it a motion to do so. Motion was seconded.
Young said that if revenue that would come in would be shared among all Districts,
whi ch District would be purcha sing. :\'a s ans wered Distr i c t 7.
-4 -
Fox then asked if it wouldn't be the s a me in reve r se if the City of Or a nge we r e
reimbursed upon building that system by the District as if they were discounte d .
Winn asked if a motion is passed if we couldn't refer this item to the Executive
Connnittee for future cases like this.
Young said she was worried about the precedent we would be setting because we
aren't always dealing with goverrunental agencies.
Chaput stated that District 7 would be buying facilities and if we waive the fees
the rest of the Districts are actually paying for District 7. Would vote no on
that basis .
Voice vote. Then called for roll call vote on motion to grant request for waiver
of disposal fees. Motion carried. 4 Districts in favor, 2 Districts opposed & 1 tie
vote.
Question was asked what it would cost the other Districts. FAH advised for
Districts 2 & 3 would pay about 1/3 the cost and for remainder of other Districts
would be between 5-7% or under $2,000.
A r!( then further moved that the Executive Committee be requested to study the
sibilities of setting a new policy in regard to future charges in this area
report back to the Board. Motion was seconded and carried.
(17)
(23)
Changing October Board Meeting date to Oct. 1
FAH advised that this was because the Joint Chairman and General Manager would
be out of State. Also to give more time between Board meeting and adjourned
meeting to consider ordinance at the end of the month.
~nta Ana River Interceptor report
FAH advised that we had good news for District 2 . Were concerned we might be
faced with $1.4 million more in cost. Letter from SWRCB indicated that about
86% of Contract 2-14-3 will be eligible for grant assistance, which goes to the
upstream people, which means District 2 will have a smaller percentage to pay. On
the next contract which goes from Imperial Highway to Featherly Park, have agreed
to grant eligibility of some. 93% and on the last reach that goes to Cotmty Line
are talking in terms of 100% for the upstream people. Still don't really believe
the nunbers but are much better than what we have had before. Distric t 2 is in
good shape at this point.
(2 Inspection Costs to City of Los Alamitos
Culver questioned why contractor would not pay for permit costs. REL explained
that they had a meeting with the City staff and City Manager and these are not
regular permit fees. All of this inspection work is done by outside services.
Do not have in-house personnel . City of Los Alamitos contracts for all their
engineering and this is to defray that cost .
Byrne asked why the City of Los Alamitos is handling the inspection and if
Districts didn't have suitable inspectors. REL said these inspecto rs are for
traffic control in which they are more knowledgeable than we are.
Culver indicated that letter from City states that con tractor is operating within
City without a permit. Asked if that was correct. Was answered yes, that is why
we had the meeting. Contractor will have bonded guarantee . Is responsibility
of contractor, not the District's. Culver added he thought the contractor
would state that all permit fees would be paid by him. REL said these are
different than regular permit fees; are inspection fe es . 20 % is the City's
-5-
handling fees . These costs are estimated to be incurred by their outside
engineering firm. Th.is is very similar to the trpe of charges incurred by
Metropolitan Water District and other agencies who construct a major project
within a City.
Byrne stated that we should have Executive Committee look into policy and
procedures on this.
Chair asked if the maker and the second to the motion would withdraw their
motion and refer this item to the Executive Committee and General Counsel.
Withdrew motion.
Since there will be no Executive Committee meeting in August, was referred to
the September meeting.
(39-b) Orange Park Association request
Woodruff referred to Mr. Harper's report on the two alternatives to the proposal.
Said General Counsel's report pointed out the underlying reasons for request.
Commented on projected costs.and read list of expenses . Said $5,000 should be
deposited with .District before W1dertaking any action and to get proceedings
through LAFC. Tilis would include basic engineering costs and in-house expenses.
If and when approved by LAFC, balance of $10,000 would have to be deposited
before any additional costs would be incurred.
Saltarelli asked if, assuming we approve this and the process goes thTough, do
we have any certainty that residents of that area are buying into the District
at a cost equal to the costs paid for over the years? FAH answered yes, would
be equitable based on the escallation in the annexation fees as are indicated
in the report. Is our contention that the annexation fee does create equity
among the taxpayers. Would assume the bonded indebtedness also .
Dostal asked how it would affect the existing District 7 taxpayers . FAH said
it was his understanding that there will be no effect as far as taxpayers . Would
actually receive benefit from funds coming into the District.
MUCH DISCUSSION
George Rach & Peggy McElligott spoke and explained proposal further.
Perez spoke on behalf of City of Orange and District 7 representative who was
absent.
Dostal moved that this item be deferred to an adjourned meeting of District No. 7.
Motion seconded. Meeting date set for August 20th at 7:30 p.m.
Burton requested that map be sent to Directors showing more clearly the area and
where sewer lines are.
-6-