Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-06-1111 COUNTY SANIT ATidN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX Bl 27. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) June 5, 1975 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 WEDNESDAY J \.JUNE lL 1975, 7: 30 p IM·. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA TELE PH ON ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6 _, 7 and 11 of Orange Coun:tY, California, wi] 1 be held at the above hour and date. Tentative adjournment prior to next regular meeting: Executive Conuni ttce -June ll, 1975, 6: 00 p. rn. (immediately preceding Joint Board Meeting) MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Calif?rnia JOINT BOARDS Regular Meeting Wednesday, June 11, 1975 7:30 p.m. Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Cal if., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 The .following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory . Warrant lists are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediate l y preceding the meeting , but will appear in the supp l emental agenda available at the meeting. No. 9 -Consent Calendar . The following items fall into this category in accordance with the definition established by the Boards: All Districts No. 9 -a -Determining Prevailing Wage Rates for Construction Work by Outside Contractors . . ·. The State Government Code requires that we adopt , period i ca·11y, a resolution determining ·the prevailing labor rates for public works construction · contracts . Since this resolution is quite lengthy, it is not included in the agenda material although it will be available for inspection at the meeting. It should be emphasized that this resolution does not establish wage rates for our employees; it involves only employees of contractors .engaged i n construction work fo~ public projects. · No. 9 -b -Approving Agreement with County of Orang e for 1975-76 In-Place Density Tests to Determine Re l at ive Compaction o f Sewer Trench Backfill. This is a routine action extending the existing agreement between the Districts and the County Highway Department for soils testing services in connection with sewer construction projects . We have found the County's services satisfactory and acceptable to ourselves and to the various cities in which our projects are con - structed. In addition, our projects are frequent l y lopated in County road rights of way and the use of the County 's laboratory facilities expedites work completion. No. 9-c -General Authorization for Attendance of Personnel at Meetings. For the past several years , the General Manager has b e en authorized, o n an annual b a sis, to designate members of th e Bo ard and/or staff to attend meetings, confere n ce s , etc., within t h e State, which he believes will b e -o f valu e to the Districts. It is recommended that this authorization be r e newed . No. 9-d -In-Process Pipe Inspection Services for 1 9 75-76 Fiscal Year. The staff is recommendi n g the acceptance of the proposal of Smith~Emery Company for in-process pipe testing for th e coming fiscal year. Included in the agenda ma terial is a Memor a ndum from the Districts' Chief Engineer, describing the manner in whic h.the selection of the testing firm was made. No. 9-e -Sale of Processed S e wage Slud g e, Sp e cifica t ion No. S-013. Pursuant to Board a utho rit y , we a r e t aking bid s on J u n e 1 0 , for the sa l e of the s ludge Distr i cts ' pe r sonne l h a ve pro c essed . Appr o ximat e ly 3600 yards are read y f o r -s hip me nt. The s t a ff will have a r ecommendation r e l ative to the h i g hest b idder by meeting time . No . 9 -f -Cons i derat ion o f Awar d o f Pu mps a n d Dr ive Un i ts f or the Add i tional Pumping F a cilit i es at t h e Oc e an Outfall Pump i n g _St a tio n, Plant No . 2 ] Huntingto n Beach, Job · No . J-6 -lB .· In Sep t e mber, t h e Di stricts rec e i v e d one bid for th e total ~n sta ll at i on and c ons tr uc ti on of two add i t i onal pumping uni ts and appurte n anc es at t he Di str i cts ' Ocean Ou t f a l l Pumping Station . The bid r e c e ive d was 27% g reater than the eng i n e er 's e s t i ma t e and 6 0 % grea t e r than th e budge t ed amount . On recommen d ation o f the staff, t he Boar ds rejected the bid and in struct e d th e staff to purchase the n ec e ssary major i t e ms of equ ipme nt which we r e e stimated i n e x cess o f $1 mi ll i o n and hav e th e i n~tallation p e rformed by force a c co unt or b y contract wo r k. The first equipme nt contr a ct , J -6 -l A, f o r t h e t wo gas powered eng i nes was a warded b y the Board in February . J-6 -lB is a n equ ipmen t c ontrac t t o purchase the n e c e ssary pumps a n d gear d riv e e qu ipment. Bid s f o r th is equi pme nt we r e so li c it ed fro m seven major pump s u p pliers, b u t b ecau se o f d e l iver y time l i mi t a t i ons o r t h e i r in- ~bilit y to mee t the pump curves (w h i ch are very restrict i ve to mat ch e xi s t ing p ump charact e r i stic s ), on ly t wo b i d s ·w e re r ec e i ved. Th e l o w bid wa s r ece ived fr o m Mcc al l a Bro s ., of San ta Ana , in the -2- amount of $345,000, slightly above the engineer's estimate o f $3 1 4 ,358 .68 . We recommend that the Board approve t'he award to Mccalla Bros . No . 9-g -Change Orde r No. 1 -Additional Boiler Facilities at P l ant No . 2 -Job No. PW -035. Dur i ng the course of the installat i on of this boiler to provide additiona l steam for sludge digestion at Plant No. 2, i t was discovered that there were conflicts in the p lan s between the new and existing piping. The contractor was instructed to perform the necessary adjustments on a force account basis . It is recommended that a change order be approved in the total amount of $1 ,474 .76 and authorizing an extension of time of 276 cal endar d ays · needed for reordering the boiler unit as described i n the change order. No. 9-h -Comp l etion of Job No. PW -035 -Additional Boi ler F ac i lit i es at Plant No. 2. This job was completed on .May 30, 1975 .. The ·cont ractor has sa t isfactori l y complied with the requirements of the contract . It is recommended that the customary reso l ution be adopted accepting the wo r k as comp l ete and author izing -riling of a Notice of Completion·. No . 9-i ~ Change Order No. 1 -Job No. P2 -20 -Power Reliability Project at Plant No . 2. Dur i ng the course of the contract, it was·determined that .25 -foot capi l lary tubes were r equ ired for the sensing of the temperature for the sludge sensing devi ces in lieu of the 15-foot tubes specified . The contractor provided the 25 -foot tubes at an additional cost of $2,218 .39. In addition , the contractor was requested to make certain revisions in the steel flooring at Power Building "B" where the transformer was to be lo cated as a part of this contract . The contractor sustained addit i onal lay - out costs in the amount of $500. These two add items are r ecom- mended for approval . It was necessary for the District to suspend the contractor and have the balance of the work performed by Distric ts' per sonnel . on a force account basis which was chargeable to the c ontract . The Districts ' work required to complete the project amounted to $5 , 3L18. 64 . The staff is therefore recommending approval of this change order which results in a total deduct of $2 ,630.25 fr om t he contract . . -3- No. 9-j -Completion of Job No. P2-20, Power Reliability Project at Plant No. 2. In September, 1972, the Districts received bids on a State and Federally funded project to improve the power reliability at Plant No . 2 . Eight bids were received which ranged from $158,000 to $232,000. The engineer's estimate for this project was $350,000. One of the major pieces of equipment ~nder this contract was a 1 2 kv transformer to be installed at Power Building "B" at Plant No . 2. After placement of the order for this trans- former, the contractor, the electrical supply company , as well as the transformer manufacturer were hampered by delays caused by the s~arcity of materials, particularly aluminum wire nec e ssary for the construction of this transformer. It was almost two years before the transformer was delivered to Plant No . 2 . D~ring this two~year period of ti~e, bec~use of failures on his · other construction projects, the contractor could not complete . the work and assigned all responsibility for the completi on of this contract to the bonding company. $100 ,DOO or more of the $158 ,000 contract was associated with direct material purchases. The District s completed the project and have satisfied the re- quirement's of the contract and the grant . Mr. Nissen, our former General Counsel, has continued to represent th~ Districts ' interests in this matter as he has been directly involved with the bonding company since t he contractor failed to perform . The final closeout agreement is . being pre- pared and will be executed by bot h the contrahtor and the bonding .company prior to this Board meeting. Two stop notices have b e en filed by labor subcontractors which the contractor and bonding company are contesting the validity of the amounts associat ed therewith . A bond will be posted by the bonding company for the amount of the stop notices. It i s , therefore, recommended that this job be accepted as complete and the closeout a greement b e approved . This is the last remaining project of the Districts ' 1971-7 2 fiscal year grant program . District No . 2 No. 9-k -Change Order No. 2 -Contract No . 2-17-1, Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer. P~ior to the receipt of bids, the Yorba Linda County Water District requested the inclusion of a 12" VCP stub to service -4 - the Water District's sewer faciliti es . This work was included as a part of the District 's contract to be paid for solely by the Water District. A revision in the p l ans for the Water District has indicated a delay in the installation of the stub at this time . The Water Distr ict has, therefore, requested the deletion of the work associated with their system and the con- tractor has agreed to de lete those items ass6ciated with this work. It is therefore recommended that the change order in the deduct amount of $4,960 be approved. Distric t No . 3 No. 9-1 -Addendum No . 1 to Contract No. 3-21 -1 . During the bidding period f or this job (Westside Relief Trunk Sewer), the District 's consulting engineer, in discussi on s with the staff o f the Flood Control District, mutually agr eed that the crossing under the Flood Control Channel near the intersectio n of the San Diego Freeway and Seal Beach Boulevard cou l d better be accomplished by a grade adjustment iri th~ proposed trunk sewe~. This Addendum incorporat ed the grade adjustment and additional encasement required for the sewer . A copy of this Addendum is included in your agenda material and it is recommended that it be approved. No. 9 -m ~ Award of Contract No. 3-21-1. rhis re gu larly budgeted project was ·described at the time the plans and specif~cations were adopted by the Board.· Bids ·were opened on June 3, 1975, and we are happy to announce that the low bid in the amount of $1,416,448 is $il5,802 under t he engineer's estimate ($1,53 2 ,250). Seven bids were received which ranged from the low bid to a high of $1,596 ,320. A bid tabulat i o n is enclosed with your agenda material and we are recommending adoption of a resoluti on under this item awarding the contract to A. G. Tutor Co ., Inc., and N. M. Saliba Company . No . 9-n -Change Order No. 12 -Contract No . 3 -18 -Knott Interc eptor . This change order is recommended by the staff to compensate the contractor for work directed by the Di strict 's engineer f or placement of rock bedding in excess of the contract requirements . Provisions are made for payment at the unit price in the con- tract specifications . Approval of this change order in the amount of $4 ,500.93 is recommended. -5- Di str ict No. 5 No. 9-o -Change Order No . 1 to Contract No. 5-14R -6. Subsequent to the award of this contract which is for the re pair of the Wet Wells at the 14th Street and "A" Street Pu mping St ations, it was determined that there was a minimal amount of deterioration of the concrete below the l ow water line in both of these facilities. After consultation with members of the staff and the contractor, it was det ermi ned that the contract should be modified wherein the contractor would not be required t o gunnite and pl~ce the fiberglass coating in the wet well below the l ow water line. The Contractor has agreed to a deduct on this contract in the amount of $4 ,960 .36 . It is recommended that the Board approve this change order. All work on these f acilities will be completed before mid -June. No . 9-p -Annexation No . 6, Harbor View Hills , Sector IV . The resolution appearing in the agenda is the final a~tion r equired by the Board to complete the annexation of 6 .3 acres in the Harbor View Hills area of the City of Newport Beach. The Local Agency Formation Commissi9n has approved the action and the proponents have paid $6,396,93 in annexation fees. It is r ecommended that the action appearing in the agenda be approved. District No. 7 No . 9-q -Annexation No. 44, Ursino Annexation . The Local Agency Formation Commission has approved the District 's application to annex 1 acre in the vicinity of Cowan Heights Drive and Sirrine Drive . Annexation fees of. $526 have been received . The staff recommends approval of the resolution annexing the property to the District . No. 9 -r -Proposed Annexation No . 47, Rauch Annexation. Resolution No. 75 -93 -7 authorizes initiation of proceedings for the annexation o f one acre in the vicinity of Rangeview Drive and Brier Lane . This will enable the District to serve a single family residence being constructed on the site . The staff recommends approval of the annexation . No . 9-t and 9 -u -Annexation No. 39 , Irvine Industrial Ann exation . In February , 1974, the Board approved the .application of The Irvine Company to annex approximately 315 a cres of industrially zoned property-within the City of Tustin , ge ner a l ly bounded by -6-.. the Santa Ana Freeway, Jamboree Road, the Santa Fe Ra i lroad and Myford Road . This area was withdrawn from the Irv ine Ranch Water District Sewer Improvement Area . Our Board agreed to initiate annexation proceedings through the Local Agency Formation Commission on the conditi on that the intervening 176 acre residential local collection sys tem, which was not a part o f the proposed annexation , be maintained by Dis trict No . 7 t o avoid confusion in the City of Tustin regard~n g service. I t i s the staff 's rec ommendation that an agreement be entered into with the Irvine Ranch Water District, in form approved by the Gen~ral Counsel, providing for the maintenance of the local sewer collection system (comparable to e xi sting 7th Sewer Maintenance Contract) within the reside n tial area at d i r ect cost plus 15%, and that Resolution No. 75-95 -7, ordering a n nexation 9f the 315 acres of industrial prop erty , be approved . No . 9-v -Engineering Services for the Design of t he Tu stin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Contract No .. 7 -6-8 and 7 -6 -9 . The District's Master Plan , adopted i 'n 1969, and the Pr eliminary Engineering Report for the Tusti n -Orange Trunk Sewer con s ider e d by the Board in March, 1 974, call for the con - struction of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer wh i ch extends from the intersection of Mitchell and Red Hill to the norther l y terminus in Santiago Canyon Road near the intersection of Linda Vista Street in the City of Orange. Presently , there are two lower portions of this relief sewer system under construction (Contracts Nos . 7-6-6 and 7 -6-7) whi ch will be completed this year to the intersection of Fairhaven Avenue and Esplanade Street . Flow measurements in t h e existing facilities indicate that the North Trunk Sewer serv ing the northern portion of the Dis - trict is presently flowing full. With the completion of.this segment of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer , the North Trunk Se.wer will be r e lieved and the District's Master Plan faci li ties will be completed with the except ion of a few minor facili ties in the southern part of the District ifi t he Irvine Comp l ex area . The staff has requested a proposal from Boyle Engineering for the design services. A copy o f their proposal is included in your agenda material . The total project cost for the remain- i ng portions of the Tustin -Orange Trunk Sew er is estimated at $1,082,000 . Design services as outlined in the Eng ineer's pro - posal .are $59,172, minus a credit for the preliminary engineering in the amount of $5,474, which reduces the fe e for the prepara- tion of the plans and specifications for the two contracts to $53 ,698 . It is recommended that t ·he Board accept the proposal of Boyle Engineering for the preparation of plans and specifi- cations for Contracts Nos. 7-6-8 and 7 -6 -9 . -7-.. All Districts No. 12 -Propos ed Joint Work s Bud gets f o r 197 5-7 6 . Copie s of the proposed Joint Operating and Joint Con- struction Budgets for t he 1975-76 fiscal year were included in a report from the Executive Committee , which was mai led to all Directors on June 3rd. The Committee met on May 29th immediately preceding the adjourned Joint Board meeting, but because of time constraints, t h e members were not able to review fu lly the Joint Operating and Construction Budgets. The Committee will meet and consider these matters at. 6:00 p .m ., Wednesday, June 11, immediately preceding t h e Joint Board meeting . If any Director ha s any questions concerning the . budget material mai l ed June 3rd, please cal l Wayne Sylveste r , the Districts' Director of Finance, or Fred Harper . No. 13 -Nom inations for Joint Ch airman and Vice Joi n t Chairman. As provided in .the Joint Boards ' Rules of Procedure , nominat i ons for these two o ffices are made at the regular June meeting, wi t h elections to take place at the July re gular Jo i nt Board meeting . For the new Directors ' informat i on, we have in- c luded in the supporting documents section of _the agenda material, an excerpt from the Rules of Procedure for Meet ings relative to the e l ection of the Chai rman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Adminis - trative Organization . District No. 2 No. 25 -a and 25 -b -Abandonment o f Yorba Linda Force Main Under the Orange Freeway . Several years ago , pr i or to the construction o f the Orange Fre eway, the Dis trict installed a portion of the proposed Yorba Linda Force Main across the State right . of way . Th is portion o f the f orce main was constructed of r einforced fiberglass pipe and it was our intention that it be used at a subsequent date as a part of the force main system diverting flows from the inter- section of Yorba Linda Bo ul evard and Associated Road to the g ravity sewer a t Kraemer Avenue, thereby relieving the overloaded Newhope- Pl acent i a Trunk Sewer . The staff and engineers have completed the field investigatio n authorized by the Board . Included in the agenda material is a r eport from our consul t ing engineer which i s concurred in by the Di strict 's staff , recomme·nding that t his portion o f the force main be abandoned and that a new section be construct ed under the freeway · at a cost of approximately $110 ,000 . -8- The staff has negotiated with the District's engineers relative to the additiona l time required to prepare pr ecise plans and specificatio ns for the added construction. We recommend that · their design fee for the Yorba Linda Force Main be increased by $4,200 to reflect the additional work (estimated construction cost, $110,00b). District No. 7 No. 28 -Southern Pacific Railroad Compan y Easement , Constru ction of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer , Contract No . 1~6-1 .. Included in the agenda supporting documents is a let ter report from the District's appraiser, Goode and Goode, recom- mending that the District proceed with the settlement of temporary and permanent rights of way as proposed in ou r Chief En gineer 's letter dated May 29th to the Southern Pacific Transportation Company. The action appearing on the agenda declares the Board 's intent to accept a Grant of Easement from the railroad in accord - ance with the terms of the District's offer dated May 29th . FAH :j -9- Fred A. Harper General Manager I ·· .. ~· · BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanil!tion Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS II MEETING DATE JUNE 11 1 1975 -7:30 P.M. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary Post Office Box 8127 l 0844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA ADJOURNMENTS POSTED • .':' COMP & MILEAGE .... ~ .. .. FILES ~ET UP ...... ~ .... .. RESOI UTIO;JS CERTIFiED.V. l.EHERS WRITTEN .... ~ •• MINlil ES WR:rrrn .. ~ MINUTES HLED .•••. V""'. (4) Considettttien ef metieft te Feeeive e:ftel file mi1u:ite exee~ts; if aFly, 6ee 5tll'~lemeatal ageRS8 (5) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following as mailed: ~\s District 1 May 14, 1975 regular and May 29, 1975 adjourned .N\tS District 2 May 14, 1975 regular and May 29, 1975 adjourned M]S District 3 May 14, 1975 regular and May 29, 1975 adjourned Mt§ District 5 May 14, 1975 regular and May 29, 1975 adjourned ~15 District 6 May 14, 1975 regular and May 29, 1975 adjourned "1 ts District 7 May 14, 1975 regular and May 29, 1975 adjourned "'15 District 11 May 14, 1975 regular and May 29, 1975 adjourned (6) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: FILE ... " .......... - LETTER ···········- A/C ••.• TKLR •••• Joint Chairman General Manager General Counsel Special Committee on Industrial Waste Ordinance (See enclosed report) meetings, ... (7) (8) JWll CALL VOTE.- ... -ITEMS ON SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file certification of th e Gen e ral Manager that he has checke d all bills appearing on th e a ge nda , found them to be in order, and that he recoJJDTiends authoriza tion f or payment ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote moti on approving Joint Op e rating and Capital Outlay Revolvin g Fund a ccounts payable check reg i s ters for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and auth orizing payment of claims liste d on page "I" ; a n4 approving acc ounts payable ch e ck registers for signature of the Ch airmen of the r e spective Dis t ricts, and authorizing payment of said claims listed on the p ag es indi cated below: BI STRICT 1 HarraHts, if B:H)' DISTRI CT 2 warrants -See p age "II" DISTRICT 3 warr ants -See p age "II" DIS'f'RIC'fS 3 & 11 "'aspen:5e f1:1nd warrant:3, if aHy DISTRICT 5 warra nts -Se e page "II " DISTRICTS 5 & 6 suspens e fund warrants -See p age "II" DISTRICT 6 warrant:3, if aHy DI STRICT 7 warrants -'See p~ge ------:-: "III" DISTRICT 11 narrants, if aHy (9) ALL DISTRICTS Ro:I C2ll Vot e or Cast Un an i mcu> Ballot CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and lillles s an y particular item is requested to be removed from the consent c al e ndar b y a Director , staff member, or member of the public in attendan ce , t here will b e n o separate discussion of these items. All items on th e c ons ent c a lendar shall be considered in the r~gular order of business . Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their n am e, a ddre s s and designate by letter the item to be removed from ·the cons ent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Ch a irman will determine if any items are to b e d e lete d f r om t he co ns en t calendar. ~ ~ '} Consideration of action to approve all agenda items app e aring on the consent calendar not specifically r e moved from s ame . -2- . . ..~ (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS ~:::::;L(a) Consideration of Standard Resolution No . 75-85, determining prevailing A/C .... TKLR •••• wage rates to be paid by contractors on Districts' construction ? G~---~ contracts, as required by State law; and rescinding Resolution No. 74-80 I ............................... FILE -"""/ ~----~~ (b) A/C •••. TKLR • ..u. __ ...................... ..... I _.......~ .......................... .. (c) FI LE ················- LETTER ............. . A /C ••.. TKL R ... . --···················· @--~-==············ (d) LETTER ......•.....•• N C .... TKLR .•.. --····················· (9e) ITEMS ON S~~-~~~ENDA LElTER ············- A/C •... TKLR .... -~?. ..... ~·-·· -······················· FILE ···········-··- ~············· A/C •..• TKLR ••.• :IY.!..:.~.~ -·-··-················· (g) FILE ................. . LETTER •.•.••....•.•• A /C .••• TKL R .••• f!LE •....••.•......••• ...fh) ~?.!'.~ A/C ••.• TKLR .•.• ~ (i) FI LE ................. . LETTER ............. . N C .... TKL R ..•. Consideration of Resolution No. 75-86, approving agreement with the Collilty of Orange for 1975-76 in-place density tests to detennine relative compaction of sewer trench backfill. See page "A" Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend meetings, conferences, facility inspections, and other functions within the State of California which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts; and authorizing reimbursement for expenses incurred Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve proposal submitted by Smith-Emery Company, dated June 3, 1975, for in-process pipe testing for the 1975-76 fiscal year, at no price increase over the current year's agreement. See pages "B" and · "C" Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding Sale of Digested Sewage Sludge, Specification No. S-013, to Soil Mix, Inc. in the a mount of $2.10/cubic yard, for. an estima ted total of $7,350.00. Se e page "IV" Consideration of Resolution No. 75-87, to receive and file bid tabulation and reconunendation, and awarding contract for Pumps and Drive Units for the Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall Pwnping ~tation, Plant No. 2, Hlliltington Beach, California, Job No. J-6-lB, to McCalla Bros. in the amount of $345,000.00. See pages __ "_D_" __ and "E" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Additional Boiler Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-035, authorizing an addition of $1,474.76 for additional boiler piping, and granting an extension of time of 276 calendar days required to reorder the boiler from another supplier, to ·the contract with Porter Boiler Service, Inc. See page "F" Consideration of Resolution No. 75 -88, accepting Additional Boiler Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-035, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "G" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Power Reliability Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-20, granting a time extension of 714 days to the contract with Mel Gorham Electric Company; and adding additional equipment and flooring revisions in the amo\Illt of $2,218.39 and deducting for Districts' force account work to complete said job in the amount of $5,348.64, for a net deduction of $2,630.25 from said contract. See page "H" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on p age 4) -3 - (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) FILE ···-·". ·.· .. · •. (j) (Jgr_!R . , .... ._:_ V" Consideration of Resolution No. 75-89, accepting Power Reliability Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-20, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout A/C ··-·I KLR -··· ~ ... ~:~~-~----~-.ti' Agreement. See page "I" _._ ....... ............... FILE ·········-···--- LETTER •......•..•.•• we .... TKLR ·-·- DISTRICT 2 (k) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer, Reach 1, Contract No. 2-17-1, approving a deduction of $4,960.00 from the contract with Bebek Company due to deletion of items 14 and 15 from said contract as requested by Yorba Linda Cotmty Water District. See page "J" DISTRICT 3 (1) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Westside Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 and Portion of 27, Contract No. 3-21-1 FILE ·······-·----(m) ~~-· Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 75-90-3, to·receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Westside Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 and Portion of 27, Contract we .... TKLR .•.. FILE •••••.•••••.•••••• LETTER ...•.••••••.•• we .... TKLR •.•. No. 3-21-1, to A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Co., in the amotmt of $1,416,448.00. See page "K" (n) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 12 to the plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18, authorizing an addition of $4,500.92 for additional rock bedding, to the contract with A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Co., a Joint Venture. See page "L" DISTRICT 5 (o) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Wet Well Repair and Remodeling at 14th Street and "A" Street Ptnnping Stations, Contract No. 5-14R-6, approving a deduction of $4,960.36 from the contract with Rewes-Schock, JV, due to changes in construction methods. See page "M'' -~'~~~p) ~-~~ Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 75-91-5, ordering annexation of approximately 6.29 acres to the District in the vicinity of the San Joaquin Reservoir (Annexation No. 6 -Harbor View Hills, Sector IV, Annexation to Cotmty Sanitation District No. · 5) A/C .... TKLR •••• -...................................... . DISTRICT 7 FILE --,--··"~ Consideration of Standard Rehsol uD~ion. No .. 75-h92-7 ~ ~r~eringf CannexaHti~nh r.rn-E~.fa '~.::-i. / of approximately 1 acre to t e 1str1ct rn t e v1c1n1 ty o owan eig ts ~ ·~ V' Drive and Sirrine Drive (Annexation No. 44 -Ursino Annexation to ~ Ale .... TKLR •••• Cotmty Sanitation District No. 7) ...................................... __ ............................ __ .............. . (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page S) -4- (9) (CONSENf CALENDAR continued £rom page 4) DISTRICT 7 (Continued) riLE ···········~···-(r) \ ., ' . I.ETTER ••• :.. . : ••• Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 75-93-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 1 acre of territory to the District in the vicinity of Rangeview Drive and Brier Lane (Proposed Annexation No. 47 -Rauch Annexation to Cotmty Sanitation District No. 7) A/C •••• TKLR •••• File •••.. J.L. .... _ LETTER •••••••••••.•• A/C •••• TKLR -··· (s) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Eddie Nahigan requesting annexation of approximately 6.934 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Overhill and Miravista Drive, and refer to staff for study and recommendation. See page "N" v (t) .FlLE ............... _ Consideration of Resolution No. 75-94-7, approving agreement with Irvine Ranch Water District, in form approved by General Counsel, to operate and maintain the local sewer collection system within the 176-acre residential area excluded from Annexation No. 39 -Irvine Industrial Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7, pursuant to the conditions established for said annexation. See page "0" LETTER •••••••••••••• A/C .... TKLR ... .. >~.;~ ................ . FILE ................. &-- LETTER·····-~ A/C •••• TKLR .... (u) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-95-7, ordering annexation of approximately 315.773 acres to the District in the area generally botmded by the Santa Ana Freeway, Jamboree Road, Santa Fe Railroad and Myford Road (Annexation No. 39 -Irvine Industrial Annexation (v) FILE ..: ••..•.. _ .... '/ LETTER ••..• U:,, A/C .•.. TKLR .... to Comty Sanitation District No. 7) See page "P" Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of Boyle Engineering Corporation, dated June 2, 1975, for engineering services in connection with preparation of plans and specifications for Tustin-Orange Trtmk Sewer, Portion of Reach 12, Reach 13 and Portion of Reach 14, Contract No. 7-6-8, and Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 and 16, Contract No. 7-6-9, for a total fee of $59,172.00, less a credit for preliminary engineering study fees received in the amount of $5,474.00, for a total net fee of $53,698.00. See page "Q" (10) ALL DISTRICTS FILE ···········---Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any ::E~--~~~--:@ ALL DISTRICTS ... -······-·-·······-Verbal report of the Executive Cammi ttee re meetings of May 29th and Jme 11th --·-·-··--( 12) ALL DISTRICTS :1LE ................ .. ,ETrER ............. . ~deration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: ~Staff report on proposed Joint Works Budget: (1) 'consideration of motion approving 1975-76 personnel requirements; vc .... TKL~otr can Vote or Cast ' and adoption of Resolution No. 75-96 amendinR Positions and ··-··-............. .Unanimous Ballot IY\ S Salaries Resolution No. Yl-5, as amended (Copy of reso~ution in Directors' meeting folders) Ne>TE'. ~ ~n-'~ ......... ~. ~ \,4 'JS· I 1 ROLL CAll vorr .... _ ~ ROLL CALL VOTE .• - (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the 1975-76 Joint Operating Budget (3) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the 1975-76 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (Joint Works Construction) ((;)) Consideration of motion directing the General Counsel to prepare /Y\~ necessary documents re deferred compensation plan ALL DISTRICTS Nominations for Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. See page "R" (14) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (lS)~T....L- 0 bus in es items, if any (16) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~ '. E f ~ .. /.C .. (17) DISTRICT 3 ~L L Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items AJC .... TKLR •••• (17) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim submitted -·-·········~\S by General Telephone Company of California, dated June 6, 1975, in -·········-·mAAs oN the amount of $2,070 .57, relative to the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, SUPPlEMENTAL AGENDA Contract No . 3-18, and refer to the District's liability insurance carrier, as recommended by the General Counsel (18) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn g· . ..5'2. ons or upplemental agenda items, if any (20) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn g" . .S ~ (21) 'DISTRICT 6 iness (22) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn 8 '..S ~ 1_{(23)1 DISTRICT 11 ~ Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~ :5 3 FI LE •• a .... m.«mT ( 2 5) DISTRICT 2 LETIER •• -....,."" (a) Consideration of motion to receive and fi l e report of consulting AfC .... TKLR .... -·-················· Ml5> engineer, dated June 5, 1975, regarding abandonment of portion of Yorba Linda Force Main mder Orange Freeway . See page "S" '~·-···~--(b) L ETTER .?,.~ A/C .... TKJ.R .... ~-~-- Consideration of motion to receive, file and. accept propos a l of Lowry & Associates, dated May 2 3 , 1975, for design of new force main section under the Oran ge Freeway in connection with construction of Yorba Linda Force Main, Contract No. 2-16-2, for a lump sum fee of $4, 200. See p age "T" (26)(~~ ~r business a~n~di--....c=o~mm=:-:un=-:"'1~c~a~t~1~on~s or supplement a l agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn 8 :53 -6 - (28) DISTRICT 7 (a) Fl~-···-·-- LETTER ........... -M l ~ A/C ••.• TKLR •••• '' l Consideration of motion to receive and file report of Goode & Goode, dated Jl.llle S, 1975, re appraisal of right of way to be acquired from the Southern Pacific Railroad Company in connection with construction of the Tustin-Orange Trtmk Sewer, Reach 11 and a Portion of Reach 12, Contract No. 7-6-7. See page · "U" ···-··-················· --.. ·······~'."',..~····" (b) Consideration of motion declaring the Board's intent to accept a ~·!········-·· .. ·-· Grant of Easement from Southern Pacific Railroad Company in accordance LETTER ~-'.·:.~-~~.:~, -' . with the terms of the District's offer dated May 29, 1975, for an AIC *.::~_ ... : .. , ,~ amount not to exceed $50 ,000, in form approved by the General Cotmsel. -················· See page "V" -------- (29) (30) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~· .5'/ -7- II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California ALL DISTRICTS . JOINT BOARDS SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS JUNE llJ 1975 -7:30 P.M. Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telepf-iones : Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AG EH DA (8) Consideration of roll .c a ll vote. motion approving Joint Opera ting and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund accounts payable check reg isters for signature of the Chairman of District No. l, and authorizing payment of claims listed on page · '~I" ; and approving a ccounts payable check registers for signatur.e of the Chairmen of the respective Districts, and authorizing payment of said claims listed on the pages indicated below: DISTRICT 1 H8:l'!'flRts, if 8:R)' DISTRICT 2 warrants See page "II" DISTRICT 3 warrants -See page "II" fHS'f'RIC'fS 3 & 11 "u"pense ftind ·..va1;rents, if flfl)' DISTRICT 5 warrants -See page "II" DISTRICTS 5 & 6 suspense fund warrants -See page "II" OIS'fRICT 6 n·arrtrn:ts, if any DISTRICT 7 warrants -See page ------"III11 DISTRICT 11 warrants, if aRy (9e) Considera tion of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommend a tion and awarding Sale of Digeste d Sewage Sludg e, Specific·ation No. S-013, to Soil Mix, Inc. in the amount of $2.10/cubic y a rd, for . an estimated total of $7,350.00. See page "IV" DISTRICT 3 (17) Conside rat i on of motion to rec e ive , fil e and deny claim submitted by General Te lephone Co mp a ny ·of California, date d June 6, 19 75, in the amount of $2,0 70 .57, relative to the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18, and refer to the District's liability_ insurance carrier, a s recommended by the Ge neral Coun s el WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 26049 26050 26051 26052 26053 26054 26055 26056 26057 26058 26059 26060 26061 .. ·26062' 26063 26064 26065 26066 26067 26068 26069 26070 26071 26072 2b073 26074 26075 26076 · 26077 26078 I• 20079 26080 26681 26082 26083 26084 26085 26086 26087 26088 26089 26090 2b091 26092 26093 26094 . 26095 26096 26097 26098 26099 26100 Advance Sales & Service, Truck Parts $ Alex Fish Company, Ecological Research Supplies All Bearing Service, Inc., Seals & Be~rings Amac Equipment Co., Switches · City of Anaheim, Power Anaheim Sewer Construction, Lateral Repair The Anchor .Packing Co., Gaskets & Pump Packing Artesia Implements & Parts Co., Equipment Rental Banning Battery Company, Batteries Beckman Instruments, Metering & .Lab Supplies Bell Pipe & Supply Company, Valves & Pipe Supplies Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair Bender Machine, Inc., Compressor Repair · Bird Machine ; Centrifuge Parts Blair Paving, Inc., Paving Borg-Warner Industrial Drives, Pump Parts Brenner-Fielder & Associates, Inc., Compress o r Parts Broadlicks Art Supply, Drafting Supplies Brookhurst Do'dge, Truck Parts Bruner & Lay, Tools C & R Reconditioning Company, Compressor Repair CS Company, Valves & Compressor Parts . Cal-State Seal Co mpany, Seals Cal's Cameras, Photo Supplies & Processing CASA, Executive Meeting Regi~tration California Distrj bu t o rs, Equipment Par.ts R. T. Campbell Co ., Filters John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Service, JPL Plant Castle Controls, Inc., Controls Coast Insurance Agency, Auto Insurance Premium ·college Lumber Co ., Inc., Building Materials Conneaut Metallic Packing Co., Pump Packing Consolidated 'El~ctric Distbrs., Electric Suplies Consolidated Bolt & Nut Co., Hardware Constructor's Supply Co., Tools Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Farts County of Orange, Printin g Crest Leasing, Vehicle Lease Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplies Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileag~ Daily Pilot, Bid Notice S-013 C. R. Davis Supply Co., Hose De Guelle & Sons Glass Co., Glass Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling Nick Di Benedetto, Employee Mileage Ida L. Duesberg, Employee Mileage Duncan Hunter Co., Hose Eastman, Inc., Printing & Office Supplies Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring Fischer & Porter Company, Metering Supplies & Pump Parts Flippen Mfg. Co., Equipment Parts City of Fountain Valley, Water I-1 A.MOUNT 267.80 53.00 97.20 1,059.26 83.46 150.00 516.31 200 .00 253.76 527.51 447.32 19.00 165.78 3,745.61 240.00 107.00 335.47 15.64 14.87 31.09 210.00 927.57 117.93 339.16 15.00 132.16 69.20 17,171.01 259.10 180.00 44.97 22.07 1,546.16 672.22 140.70 531.45 28~8 0 147 .28 40.00 67.44 9 .11 548.61 33.41 100.00 24.90 18.45 203.52 994. 49 3,000.00 642.72 34.38 40.00 .. WARRANT NO. 26101 2bl02 103 2'>104 26105 26106 26107 26108 26109 26110 2blll 26112 26113 26114 26115 ... Z.6116 26117 26118 2bll9 26120 26121 26122 2b123 26124 . '29125 26126 IN FAVOR OF France Products Division, Compressor Parts Furane Plastic, .Inc., Hardware. Garden Grove Lumber & Cement Co., Building Materials Garrett Industrial Supply Co., Equipment Cabinets General Electric Supply, Electric Supplies Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine Contract 1-1-75 General Telephone Company of California Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage Goldenwest Fertilizer Co., Grit Removal Graybar Electric Company, Electric Supplies L. C. Gysin, Employee Mileage Fred A. Harper, EPA Meeting Expense Halsted & Hoggan, Inc., Pump Parts Harrington Industrial Plastics, Pipe Supplies Harrisons & Crosf ield, JPL Chemicals Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease Holiday Inn of Somerville, Lodging JPL Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires Honeywe1i, Inc., Strip Charts Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies & Tools City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Equipment Rental Huntington Labs, Lab Supplies ICN Life Sciences Group, Lab Supplies Industrial Asphalt, Paving Materials Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware International Business Machines, Office Supplies International Harvester Co., Truck Parts Irvine Ranch Water District, Water Jensen Instrument Company, Instrumentation Supplies Jensen Tools & Alloys, Tools 26127 26128 26129 2bl30 26131 2bl32 26133 26134 26135 2bl36 26137 26138 26139 26140 26141 261lt2 26143 26144 26i45 26146 26147 26148 26149 26150 26151 26152 ?"""'53 -~54 .Justin Pa~ific Corp., Centrifuge Parts 26155 26156 Kahl Scientific Instrument Corp., Lab Supplies Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies Kelly Pipe Company, Pipe Supplies Kenron Industrial Supply, Tools King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, V-Belts & Hardware Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware & Tools LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Hardware & Tool Repair L & N Uniforms Supply Co., Uniform Service The La.cal Company, Inc., Seals Judy Lee, Employee Mileage Los Angeles Times, Annual Subscription R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., Paving Materials McCoy Ford, Truck Parts McCoy Ford Tractor, Tractor Parts . McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Controls & Hose Manning Enviromentals Corp., Test Equipment Ann Martin, Employee Mileage Master Blueprint & Supply, Printing Metal Finishing, Technical Journal Mine Safety Appliances Co., Safety Equipment Missimers Incorporated, Hardware I-2 AMOUNT $ 669.10 132.09 261.56 186.71 121.18 6,335.20 305.16 6.75 3,159.00 201.31 10.05 24.45 534.34 98.80 13,088.88 210.00 429.08 101.89 87.09 77.29 1,121.09 9.11 80. 76 122.47 65.02 9.22 245.90 152.64 162.36 2.05 655.80 233.70 3,419.56 139.30 392.34 466.02 361.t. 71 767.59 3,319.02 404.43 209.98 273.00 3,095.81 64.24 17.85 42.00 306.17 130.10 351.98 380. 71 28.20 2lt. 54 107.01 8.oo 90.61 327.36 WARRANT NO. 26157 26158 26159 26160 26161 26162 26163 26164 26165 26166 26167 . 26168 26169 26170 26171 .26172 26173 26174 26175 2bl76 26177 26178 26179 26180 IN FAVOR OF Montgomery Brothers, Inc., Pump Parts $ Moore Business Forms, Inc., Paper E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers Morrison Company, Pipe Supplies Musick, Peeler & Garrett, Special Labor Counsel Nalco Chemical Company, Chemicals National Chemsearch, Chemicals National Lumber Supply, Hardware, Tools & Bldg. Mat'ls City of Newport Beach, Water Newporter Inn, Lodging Occidental College, Ecological Trawl Orange County Appliance Parts, Valve Orange County Brake, Truck Repair Orange County Chemical Co., Blueprint Supplies Or~nge County Stamp Co.; Office Supplies Orange Paper Products, Inc., Hardware Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies Pacific Telephone Company Parks Crane Service, In~., Crane Rental M. c. Patten Corporation, Pump ·Parts Perkin-Elmer, Lab Supplies Petroleum Dynamics, Engine Parts Pro-Tech, Inc., Sampling Equipment Porter Boiler Service, Inc., Boiler Parts & Gasket.s PostIM.ster, Postage Premium Rubber Company, Hose Quality Building Supply, Building Materials ,'. 26181 26182 26183 26184 26185 26186 26187 26188 ·REA Express, JPL Freight '. 26189 26190 26191 26192 26193 26194 26195 26196 26197 26198 26199 26200 26201 26202 26203 26204 2b205 26206 26207 26208 26209 26210 Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal Red Va.l ve Company, Inc. , Valve Robbins & Myers, Pump Pa,rts Ruff's Saw Se~vice, Saw Sharpening S & C Electric Company, Electric Supplies Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Santa ·Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motor & Motor Repair Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies Science Applications, Inc., Hazard Waste Study Scientific Products, Lab Supplies City of Seal Beach, Water Seal Methods, Inc., Gasket Material Security Industrial Supply Co., Pipe· Supplies & Valve See Optics, Safety Glasses Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies John Sigler, Employee Mileage Signal-Flash Company,. Barricade Rental Sims Industrial· Supply, Hardware Fred Sinasek, Employee Mileage Snow-Gates & Valves, Steel Gates Southern California Edison Company South Orange Supply, Piping Supplies So. Calif. Coastal Water ~esearch Project Authority, Share of 75-76 Budget (Resolution 75-64) Southern California Gas Company Southern California Water Company Southern Marine Supply, Hose. I-3 AMOUNT 76.50 111.94 562. 02 '--" 819.91 1,701.29 582.84 778.31 224.30 5.00 41.74 400.00 99.48 259.50 102.40 106.69 127.20 43.97 .461.46· 216.00 127.29 276.63 345. 92 121.00 72.40 750.'00 190.16 154.23 725.51 62.00 102.37 349.45 31.50 2,778.69 50.61 699.10 301.84 1,000.00 22.54 8.80 230.00 2,898.93 53.27 296.97 40.26 26.00 106.oo 38.46 6,360.00 50,885.39 47.90 79,600.00 1,312.15 ~ 3.00 65.72 WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 26211 2h212 . >13 26214 26215 26216 26217 26218 26219 26220 26221 26222 26223 26224 26225 .. 26226 26227 26228 26229 26230 26231 26232 26233 26234 26235 26236 26237 26238 26239 26240 26241 26242 . 26243 26244 26245 26246 26247 26248 26249 29250 26251 26264 Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water $ Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Oil Company of Calif., Oil, Gasoline & Diesel Stang Hydronics, Inc., Hardware Sully Miller Contracting Co., Paving Materials Sun Electric Corporation, Electrical Repair J. Wayne Sylvester, Dir. of Finance, Petty Cash Reimb. T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Truck Parts Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage Taylor-Dunn, Equipment Parts 39 Stake & Building Supplies, Survey Supplies Thomas Bros. Maps,·Trunk Maps Trade Paper Company, Mailing Supplies Truck & Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts E. F. Tucker, Specification Supplies United Auto Part$, Truck Parts United Parcel Service, Freight-Out United Reprographics, Inc., Printing U. S. Dept. of Commerce -NTLS, Technical Journal United States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts Utilities Supply Company, Tools Van Waters & Rogers, Odor Control Chemicals Versa-Tech Development Corp., JPL Te~ting Paul Vukich, Employee Mileage Wagner Hydraulic Equipment Co., Pump Parts . Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage John R. Waples, R. s., Odor Consultant Warren and Bailey Co., Inc., ·Compressor Parts Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts West-Print, Brochure Printing Western Highway Products, Inc., Safety Signs Western Salt Company, Salt .western Wire & Alloys, Welding Supplies Russell Wold, Employee Mileage Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel World Travel Bureau, Inc., Air Fare, Various Mtgs. Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage John M. Wright, Employee Mileage Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Services Donald Winn, Jt. Chairman Meeting Expenses C. Arthur Nissan, Legal Counsel AMOUNT 86.50 358. 34 '3, 520. 64 85.86 254.43 80.60 420.96 199.17 43.50 48.67 37.26 2,423.Lt2 89.99 447.05 172.30 33.12 36.30 218.47 75.00 1,591.13 75.68 6,237.88 2,409.55 21.00 39.05 3~. 38 2·22. 90 286.20 740.66 58.35 36.65 162.38 868.35 35.22 3,030.50 25.75 58.38 62.40 2,232.80 ·1,626.93 222.93 730.00 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING $ 266,567.76 I-4 WARRANT NO. 26037 2b038 26039 26040 26041 26042 260~3 2604lt 26045 26046 26047 26048 26049 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16'. Engineers Sales-Service Co., Pumps Forkert Engineering, Survey Pl-16 Foster-Barker, Communication Equipment Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Mgmt. Pl-16 McCoy Ford, Truck A-074 McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Chain Hoist Porter Boiler Service, Inc., Contractor PW-035 Smith Emery Company, Testing Pl-16 Southern Calif. Testing Lab, Testing Pl-16· Tektronix, Inc., Instrumentation Test ·Equipment Twining La.boratories, Testing Pl-16 Industrial Indemnity Co., Assignee of Mel Gorham, Contractor P2-20 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTIAY REVOLVING TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF I-5 AMOUNT $ l,587,094.19 7,155.00 300.00 380.50 12,031.44 . 20,856.76 281.59 1,327.28 936.00 333.72 2,149~40 300.00 35,933.37 $ 1,669,079.25 $ 1,935,647.01 DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 26012 Clifford Forkert, Right~of-way .services 26'013 26014 26015 26016 26017 26018 26019 29020 26021 26022 26023 26024 26025 26026 26027 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Bebek Company, Contractor 2-17-1 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 2-17-2 Mark Dakovich, Inc.; Contractor 2-12R & 2-17-2 J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation, Contractor 2-15 Lowry and Associates, Engineering Services, 2 14-4, 2-14-5, 2-15, 2-16-1, 2-17-1, 2~17-2, 2-18 Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 2-16-1, 2-17-1 Southern California Testing Laboratory, Soils Testing 2-15 2-17-2 S. S. Zarubica, Contractor 2-18 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOF OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 3-18, 3-19, 3-20-1 3-20-2, 3-21-2 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-20-1 Mike Prlich & Sons, Contractor 3-19 The Register, Notice 3-21-1 Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 3-20-1, 3-20-2 Sully-Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 3-20-1· A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Saliba, Contra~tor 3-18 & II 3-20-2 AMOUNT $ 4,635.45 $ 149,304.60 221.40 125,405.00 . 16 ;906·. 84 24,686.CO 494.00 363.94 6.2 621. 00 $ 3242002.78 $ 328 638.23 ____ .i...:::..:. ______ ~ $ 25,251.95 116.02 15,206.00 91. 75 3,991.00 536,830.20 412704.07 $ 6232190.99 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS ~ WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 26028 State of California, Processing Fee, Annexation 6 $ 85.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND ·WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 26036 Daily Pilot, Bid Notice 5-14R-6 $ 60.35 II-1 DISTRICT NO. 7 WARRANT NO. .OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 26029 State of California, Processing Fee, Annexation 44 26030 26031 26032 26033 26034 26035 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 7-6-6 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 7-6-6 Goode & Goode Appraisers, Appraisal 7-6-7 McGuire Construction, Inc., Contractor 7-6-6 Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 7-6-6 George W. and Harriet Willis, Easement 7-6-6 III AMOUNT $ 85:00 $ 1,250.00 210. 76 3,775.00 145,188.90 104.00 65.00 $ 150,593.66 $ 150,678.66 B I D . T A B U L A T I 0 N SHEET Date June 10. 1975 -11 :00 A.M. Contract For: SALE OF DIGESTED SEWAGE SLUDGE Speclficatlon No. S-013 1. 2. 3. CONTRACTOR Soi 1 Mix, Inc. I rv'i ne Ke 1"1 og g Supp 1 y Carson Goldenwest Fertilizer Santa Aria UNIT PRICE $2. 10/cubic yard $2.05/cubic·yard $ .55/cubic yard TOTAL BID $7,350.00 $7, 175.00 $1,925.00 It is recommended that the award be made to Soil Mix, Inc. of Irvine, California, in the amount of $2. 10 per cubic yard ($7,350.00) as the highest and best bid. v~,.,, Ck:u/g__ William N. Clarke. AGENDA ITEM #9(c) -IV-ALL DISTRICTS RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS JUNE 11, 1975 -7:30 P~M. RESOLUTION NO. 75-86 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH TI-IE COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR IN-PLACE DENSITY TESTS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR IN-PLACE DENSITY TESTS TO DETERMINE RELATIVE COMPACTION OF BACKFILL * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Dist.ricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,. DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated , by and -------- between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 and the County of Orange, for the fi.s cal year 1975-76, for conducHng in-place density tests to determine the relative compaction of backfill connected with the installation ·of sewers within public rights of way by said Districts, is ·hereby approved and a~cepted; and, Section 2. That the General Manager be authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 11, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #9(b) -A-ALL DISTRICTS CHEMISTS TESTING INSPECTfON ENGINEERS SI\·llTII-El\'IERY COl\IPANY An lndtptnd1nt Comm1rcial Tutini Laboratory Estab/ish1d 1910 781 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD • LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90021 • (213) 749~3411 3148-0 LA PALMA AVENUE ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 93806 (714) 630-4910 JUNE 3, 1975 MR. RAY E. LEWIS, CHIEF E.NGINEER ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS P • 0 • B o x 81 27 FOUNTA·IN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Reply To: YouR LETTER DATED MAY 28, 1975 SuBJEcT: .IN-PLANT PIPE INSPECTION SERVICES F I SC AL Y E AR , 1 97 5 - 1 97 6 • ·THE FOLLOWl·NG JS I~ RESPONSE TO YOUR LETTER OF MAY 28, 1975 INVITING SMITH-EMERY TO PROVIDE IN-PLANT PIPE FABRICATION INSPECTION DURING THE 1975 -1976 SERVICE PERIOD. WE ARE MOST INTERESTED IN PROVIDING THE SERVICES, AND HAVE THE CAPABILITIES AND EXPERIENCE NEEpED. IN A RECENT LETTER TO YOU DATED MAY 6, 1975, WE ANNOUNCED THE RECENT ACQUISITION OF THE Los ANGELES BRANCH OF TESTING ENGINEERS, INCORPORAT~D BY THE SMITH-~MERY COMPANY. As NOTED IN THAT LETTER, WE HAVE NOW OPENED AN ORANGE COUNTY 8 R A N C H 0 F F I C E ·w H E R E C E R T A I N SP E C I A L T Y S E R V I C E S A R E B A S E D - INCLUDING PIPE INSPECTION. MR. Louis L. PERLEY REMAINS AS HEAD OF ALL PIPE SERVICES. WE ARE PREPARED TO PROVIDE ALL OF THE SERVICES OF YOUR EX- 1 STING CONTRACT WITHOUT CHANGE IN INSPECTION. OR SUPERVISION RATES. UNDER SUCH AN AGREEMENT, SMITH-EMEAY WILL FURNISH A QUALIFIED INSPECTOR FOR ~13.00 PER HOUR. THE STANDARD TERMS AS SHOWN IN THE ENCLOSED FEE SCHEDULE WILL APPLY. SUPER- VISION BY ~R. PERLEY AT $13.00 PER HOUR, NOT TO EXCEED 20 H 0 UR S P ER WE EK • B .A SE D 0 N . A 1 60 H 0 UR M 0 N T H P ER MAN A T E AC H OF 2 PLANTS, PLUS SUP E·R V I SI 0 N , THE C 0 ST PER MONTH SH 0 UL D BE APPROXIMATELY S5494.00. THIS FIGURE WILL INCREASE OR DE- CREASE IN PROPORTION TO THE HOURS WORKED. ENCLOSE~, IS A LIST SHOWING INITIALS OF INSPECTORS CURRENTLY ON THE SMITH-EMERY STAFF, AND THEIR RESPECTIVE YEARS OF EX- PERIENCE IN THE PIPE FIELD. ALSO ENCLOSED, ARE FOUR COPIES AGENDA ITEM #9(d) B-1 ALL DISTRICTS MR. RAYE. LEWIS, CHIEF" ENGINEER ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DIST. JUNE 3, 1975 PAGE 2 -CONT. or TYPICAL PIPE REPORT FORMS TAKEN AT RANDOM FROM OUR CURRENT FILES. WE APPREC.IATE YOUR CONSIDERATION OF SMITH-EMERY AND THE OPPORTUNITY TO SUBMIT THIS PROPOSAL. WE LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH YOU AND YOUR STAFF. DMF:Ks VERY TRULY YOURS, SMITH --.EMERY COMPANY ,.. i · : /I/,~ j_/ / / . . >lJ. c.;; cc' J.-. ·/ / · d '2li 1c_1E';1 DE N N 1 s Mc FA~ n ~.w(' M AN AG ER ORANGE COUNTY OPERATIONS ENCLOSURES: (4) COPIES P!PE REPORTS FEE ScHEDULE AGENDA ITEM #9 ( d) B-2 ALL DISTRICTS CouNTY SANITATION DiSTRICrS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108H ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9270r (71.4) ~40-2910 '-" (71") 962-2411 S T A F F R E P 0 R T June 4, 1975 Subject: In-Plant Pipe Inspection Services for Fiscal Year 1975-76 To assist the staff in the implementatlon of the Districts' trunk sewer program, it has been the.policy in the past to employ the services of an Independent testing laboratory to provide the. in-plant pipe inspection services required. Because the efforts associated with the trunk sewer expansion program will cease in approximately two years, it does not appear economical at this time to change our past policy and perform this work with permanent District employe~s. Proposals have been solicited from three responsible testing laboratories which are familiar with this type of work and have performed satisfactorily with the Districts in the past. Of the three proposals submitted, Smith-Emery Company of Los Angeles and Anaheim has proposed to provide the necessary services for the 1975-76 fiscal year at the same per diem rates as charged to the Districts for the 1974-75 fiscal year. This rate was $13.00 per h6ur for qualified field inspectors. The comparable rates submitted by the other two lah0ratories were $13.90 and $15.00 oer hour. It is, therefore, recommended that the Board accept the proposal from Smith-Emery Company to perform the in-plant pipe inspeccion services for the 1975-76 fiscal year. The cost of this service for the 1974-75· fiscal year is estimated at approximately $60,000. It is estimated that the cost for this service for the next fiscal° year should be approximately the same amount. Attached with this report is the summary of the Districts' contracts pipe size and the linear footage associated therewith. Each of these contracts will require in-plant pipe inspection. REL:hje AGENDA ITEM #9(d) C-1 ALL DISTRICTS PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF WORK IN-PLANT PIPE INSPECTION 1974-75 FISCAL YEAR ~ CONTRACT NO. PIPE SIZE LINEAR FEET 2-14-3 60" 673 51" 307 2, 100 796 1,183 380 907 525 90 48" 247 6,986 1,768 120 951 4 5" 176 33" Clay 2,490 2-14-4 -51" 5,204 2,149 1,240 650 350 1,300 45" 3,353 2,100 1,000 42" 891 1,450 2,000 ·398 2-14-5 45" 820 2,150 789 465 590 400 42" 2,285 2,122 39" 2,635 101 158 200 3-20-2 63" 6,600 72" 3,900 3-20-3 72" 9,520 42" 6,930 3-20-1 66" 6,000 AGENDA ITEM #9(d) C-2 ALL DISTRICTS RESOLUTION NO. 75-87 AWARDING CONTRACT NO. J-6-lB A RESOLUTION OF TI-IE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PUMPS AND DRIVE UNITS FOR TI-IE ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES AT THE OCEAN OlITFALL PUMPING STATION, PLANT NO. 2, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, JOB NO. J-6-IB * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 ~nd 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Sec~ion 1. That the written recommendation this 'day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer that award of contract be made. to McCALLA BROS. for PUMPS AND DRIVE UNITS FOR THE ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES AT TI-IE OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION, PLANT NO. 2, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, JOB NO. J-6-lB, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for said Job No .. J-6-IB be awarded to McCalla Bros. in the total amount of $345,000.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the _Chairman and the Secre.tary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at. a rE'.gular meeting held June 11, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #9 (f) -D-ALL DISTRICTS B I D TABULATION SHEET Da. te . June 3, 1975 -11 : 00 A. M. Contract For: PUMPS AND DRIVE UNITS FOR THE ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES 'AT THE OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION, PLANT NO. 2, HUNTINGTON BEACH, C~LIFORNIA JOB NO. J-6-lB ·Engineer's Estimate $314,358.68 1. 2. 3. 4. 5 •. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. CONTRACTOR Mc Ca 11 a Bros. Santa Ana Patterson Pump Toccoa, Georgia AGENDA ITEM #9(f) TOTAL BID Schedule A Schedule B Schedule C $345,000.00 $149,983.00 $199,983.00 $349,963.00 -E-ALL DISTRICTS cou:~TY SA:UTATIO:.: J>Isn:JCTS OF O!'.A:~GE cou::TY p • 0 • B 0 x s 1 z 7 -1 0 :3 .,,. E 11 i:; I\ v {' ll u c 1:ountain Vallc;y, California H2708 . CllA:--ZGE OIU>ER CO:ffRACTOR: Porter Boiler Service, Inc. c.o. ~o._~1-----~~~~~~ DATE May 29, ___ 1_9_7-'-S __ _ JOU: Additional Boiler Facilities at Plant ~o. 2 1 .Joh No. PW-035 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (D.ElJXJCT) $1,474.76 In accordance ·with contract provisions, the followinr; changes in the contract and/or contract h'ork arc hereby authori:,cd· and as co1:-ipcnsation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from tl1c.contract price arc hcrcb)· approvctl. ADD: For rerouting of boiler piping where conflicts with existipg piping were not shown on plans· ADD TOTAL ADD $1,474.76 $1,474.76 Extension of Time The original boiler supplier.went out of business and this time extension was necessary so that the contractor could reorder and obtain a boiler from another supplier. The contractor 'is hereby granted an extension of contract time of TOTAi TIME EXTENSION 276 Calendar Days 276 Calendar Days SUMMARY OF CONTRACT ·rnrn. Original ~ontract bate Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension This Change Order Total Time Extension .. February·2s, 1974 180 Calendar Davs August 27, 1974, 276 Calendar Davs 276 ·calendar Da~s 456 Calendar Da~s Revised Contract Time Revise~ Completion Date May 3 0, 19 7 5 . Original Contract Price $ 37 573.00 Prcv. Auth. Changes $ 0. 00 This Change (ADD)(.~ $ 1 4 74. 76 ~--'--~'------~ Amended Contract Price .s 39,047.76 Hoard authorization date: June 11, 1975 Approved: By __ ~----------~-r-~----~--~·~ Consulting hng1nccr By ____________ ._..------~~:-::-::-:::-= Cont.ractor AGENDA ITEM #9(g) -F-· COUNTY SANITATIOi~ DISTRICTS of Orange County, California ALL. DISTRICTS. RESOLUTION NO. 75-88 ACCEPTING JOB NO. PW-035 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,. 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF o·RANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. PW-035 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * 1he Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section L That the contractor, Porter Boiler Service, Inc., has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for ADDITIONAL BOILER. FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-035·, on the 30th of May, 1975;. and, Section 2. That the Districts' Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance .of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the ~ontra~t; which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Additional Boiler Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-035, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 28th of Fepruary, 1974; and, Section 4. That the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Porter Boiler Service, Inc. setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Additional Boiler Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-035, is hereby approved; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary. of the Board. of Directors of District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 11, 1975. · AGENDA ITEM #9(h) -G-.ALL DISTRICTS cou:~TY SA:UTAHO:~ DISTl~JCTS OF OP.1\::GE cou::TY P. O. Box 3127 -1og~4 Elli~ Avenue Fountain Valley, ~alifornia 92708 CHANGE OIWER C.O. NO. CONTRACTOR: Met Gorham Electric Company ~~~~~~~~~~ DATE Hay 30, 1975 JOB: Power Retlabltlty Project at Pt<1nt No. 2 -Job No. P2-20 Amount of this Change Order (x);JX~~ (DEDUCT) $ 2,630.25 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract an<l/or contract '~ork arc hereby authorized and as cor.ipcnsatiOi1 therefor, the following a<lditions to or dc<luctions from the contract price arc hercb)· approvc<l. A. REFERENCE:-Districts' letters dated December 8, 1972, January 9, 1973 May 14, 1973 and Hay 18, 1973 ADD: Contractor's letters dated January 3, 1973, May 15, 1973 Hay21, 1973andApril 17, 1974 25' capillary tubes on sludge and hot water temperature controllers B. REFERENCE: Districts' letter of December 4, 1974 ~: Rev.lsions to steel flooring plans C. REFERENCE: Districts' letter of April 29, 1975. ADD 2,218.39 ADD 500.00 DEDUCT: Work accompl !shed by Districts' employees ·DEDUCT 5,348.64 TOTAL DEDUCT $2,630.tS TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time· Revised Completion Date Board authorization date: June 11, 1975 By--------~----~----,.-~~~ Contractor AGENDA ITEM #9(i) 714 Calendar Days September 18, 1972 270 calendar days April 14, _1973 714 Calendar Days 714 Calendar Days 984 Calendar Days May 30, 1975. Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes $ 158 294.oo $ __ __._o ....... o __ o ___ _ This Change ~AXID'J (DEDUCT) $ 2 ,630. 25 Amended Contract Price s 155,663.75 -H- Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By __ ~~~~~~~~~~c~1-11~c--£.,.......t~-1-1r,-.-11_1_c_c_r ALL DISTRICTS r RESOLUTION NO. 75-89 ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-20 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF TI-IE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-20 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * The Boards. of Directors of County Sanitation Districts· Nos. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County; California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That ~he contractor, Mel Gorham Electric Company, has completed the construction in accordance with the tern~ of the contract for POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT PL~T NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-20, on the 30th of May, 1975; and, Section 2. That by letter, John Carollo Engineers, Districts' engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as hav1ng been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the Districts has concurred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That Power Reliability Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-20, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 18th of September, 1972; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby auth.orized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Mel Gorham Electric Company setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Power Reliability Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-20, is hereby approved; and, Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 11, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #9(j) -I-ALL DISTRICTS • < cou;ny SA:UTAT10:-: 1>1!m~1ns or cw,\::r.E cou::TY P. o. Uox 8127 -lOHH Elli~ ,\v(·nuc 1:ountain Vull~y, C;1lifornia 92708 CllA~GH OIU>Elt ·. ·. C. O. NO. 2 co:ffRACTOR: BEBEK COMPANY I>ATE _J_u_r-ic-1-1-,-1 .... 9-,-5--- JOB: CARBON CANYON-PALM DRIVE INTERCEPTO.R SEWER, REACH 1, CONTRACT NO. 2-17-1 Amount of this Change Order ~lxlki~) (DEDUCT) S 4 960 no In accordance with contract provisions, the:' following changes in the contract an<l/or contract l>ork arc hereby authoriz.cJ and :lS co::ipcnsation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the.contract price arc hereby approved • . Referen~c: Yorba Linda County Water District's letter to the District dated April 30, 1975 . DEDUCT: .. The following items are deleted from the contract. Item 14 -· 66 L.F. of 12" VCP at $60/ft. $3,960.00 Item 15 -remodeling of the manhole for lump sum 1,000.00 Summary of Contract.Time Original Contract· Date Original Contract Time Origina1 Completion ·Date ' Time Extension This Change Order Total Extension of Contract Time Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date TOTAL DEDUCT. $4, 960. 00 December 26, 1974 180 Calendar Days , June 24, 1975 0 Calendar Days 0 Calendar Days 180 Calendar Days June 2 4 , 19 7 5 Original Contract Price Prcv. Auth. Changes $733,147.00 This Chan&e (')\1})}.) (DI;DUCT) $ 4, 960. 00 Amended Contract Price 5728,187.00 Hoard authorization date: June 11, 1975 Approved: COUt-iTY SJ\~ITATIO~J DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By ______________ ~----~------~ Consulting t11g1nccr By---------------------,.--::---~-'." Contractor AGENDA ITEM #9(k) -J-DISTRICT 2 B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N SHEET Date. June 3, 1975 -11:00 A.H. Contract For: ~ESTS I DE RELi EF INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 25, 26 & PORTION OF 27, 'CONTRACT NO. 3-21-1 FROM WESTSIDE LIFT STATION TO KATELLA AVENUE & LEXINGTON DRIVE 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. CONTRACTOR A. G. Tutor Co., Inc·. & N. M. Saliba Co. North Hollywood Risto Construction Co., Inc. Arcadia Mike Prlich & Son South El Monte John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. Paramount R. E. and R. W. Crane, Inc. Long Beach Henson Construction, Inc. Bell Gardens Bebek Company Irvine AGENDA ITEM #9(rn) -K- Engineer's Estimate $1 ,5~250.00 TOTAL BID $1,416,448.oo ·$1,444,980.00 $1,474,846.20 $1 ,478,380.00 $1,496,934.oo $1,521,643.00 $1 ,596,320.00 DISTRICT 3 cou:rtY SA:J l'f ,\Tl o:-; I) I !;T}~·J crs OF Ol~i\::r.E cou::TY P. O. Box 8127 -IoaH Elli:; ,\vC'nuc 1=ount~in Valley, C:1liforni:i ~J2708 t.o. NO. 12 CllA~GH OIU>i:R A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba, co:al~J\CTOR: a joint venture ~~~~---~~~----1> J\ TE Jun(' 11, 1975 JOU: . KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REAQI 4, CONTRACT NO. 3-18 Amount of this Change Order (AUD) (I>'1m11~) . $ 4,500;93 In acc·or<lancc with contract prpvis·ions, the .following changes in the con~rac t antl/ or contract work a re hereby author i:;: ctl and as c01:1pcnsa t ion therefor, the followin~ additions to or dc<luctions· from the contract price arc l1crcby approvcJ. Reference: Schedule·of Prices and Section 109 of the O~tailed Specifications ADD: The Contractor was directed to place one (1) foot of rock bedding from Station 334+03 to Station 337+65 and two (2) feet of additional rock bedding from Station 337+65 to Station 341-t;,67 367.85 c.y. @ 7.50 = 193.56 c.y •. @ 9.00? ·$2,758.88 1,742.04 TOTAL J.DD: $4 ,500. 9 2 No time exten~ion allowed for this change order. Original Contract Price Prcv. J\uth. Changes Amended Contract Price $ 4,334,412.oO· $ 145,604.06 4,500.92 s 4,484,516.98 Hoard authorization date: June 11, 1975 Approved: By ____ ~~-------·..--~-------....----~-Co n s ult mg .flngrnccr By--------------------,.~~~~ ·Contractor AGENDA ITEM #9(n) .. L- COUl'TY SJ\NITATIO~J l>TSTRIC:TS of Orange County, California DISTRICT 3 ·.1 .... t.:OU:~TY !:>A;, 1 TAT Jo:.: I> I !;TJ~ J CfS or CWA:!GE cou::TY P. O. Box SlZ7 -1'Hi·l•l Elli:; ,\y(•nuc Fount a i n V ~L 11 ~ y , ~ ~• l i fo r n i :1 !>2 7 O 8 CllA~GE OIU>i:R ·C. O. NO. CO:ffr:.ACTOR: Rewes-Schock, JV DATE _J_u_n_e_..,....1.,...1 .~1..,...9"'"75~---- Wet Weil Repair and Remodeling at 14th Street and "A JOB: Street Pumping Stations, Contract No. S-14R-6 Amount of this Change Order ~~~ (DEDUCT) $ 4 ,960. 36 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract an<l/ or contract t-t•or k arc here by au th or i z cu an<l as co1:ipcnsll t ion therefor, t!1c following acld it ions to or dc<luc t ions· from the con t-ract pr ice arc hereby approved. · REFERENCE: District's letter dated May 22, 1975 . . DEDUCT: Item 1 I tern 2 The Contractor wtll not be requi(ed to apply gunite and fiberglass coating below the low ·water line at 14th Street Pumping Station The .Contractor will not be required to apply gunite and fiberglass coating below the low water line at 11 A11 Street Pumping Station · No time extension this change order TOTAL DEDUCT Original·Contract Price Prcv. Au th. Changes This Change M:~~ (DEDUCT) Amended Contract Price 1,858.18 3, 102. 18 $ 4,960.36 $ 22,960.36 $ o.o·o $ ~.960.36 s 18,000.00 lloard authorization date: Approved: . June 11, 1975 By~~~~~~-------.!'-:-"'.---,..~~~ Consulting Engineer By ____ .:.-~~--------~.,..-::-:'."=-::-::-::~= Contractor AGENDA ITEM #9(o) -M- COU?\TY SANITATION I>ISTRICTS of Orange County, California DISTRICT. $ Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Sirs: May 2·0, 197 5 Re: Our Job No. 72632 We hereb.y request that the property shown on the attached sketch be conside~ed for annexation to Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 and the appropriate Orange Co~nty.Maintenance District. Enclosed is a check in the amount of $325.00 made out to the Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 and a check in the amount of $10.00 made out to LAFC for your use. We would appreciate your expediting this matter. zh Enclosures 17782 SKY PARK BOULEVARD AGENDA ITEM #9(s) • Sincerely yours, ~·72d~~ Eddie Nahigan p IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92707 -N- • (714) 549-2222 DISTRICT .7 RESOLtrrION NO. 75-94-7 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRI'CT RE SERVICE OF RESIDENTIAL AREA OUTSIDE DISTRICT NO. 7 A RESOLlITION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH IRVINE Rfu"-.JCH WATER DISTRICT FOR OPERATING AND MAINTAINING LOCAL SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM LOCATED OUTSIDE DISTRICT NO. 7 * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has heretofore adopted Resolution No. 74-38-7 authori'zing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 270 acres of territory in the vicinity of the area generally bounded by the Santa Ana Freeway, Jamboree Road, Santa Fe Railroad and Myford Road, to provide sanitary sewer service to said territory; and, WHEREAS, said resolution provided that a co_ntractual arrangement between District No. 7 and the Irvine Ranch Water District to operate and maintain the local sewer collection system within the 176-acre residential area excluded from the proponent's original annexation request so service would be provided by .the same entity within the City of Tustin, as a condition of said annexation; and, WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission has approved said annexation and authorized the District No. 7 Board of Directors to approve same, which said annexation is titled "Annexation No. 39 -(Irvine· Industrial Annexation) to Collllty Sanitation District No. 7". NOW,. THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange Co1mty, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. 'Ihat the certain agreement dated by and between ~~~--------~-- County Sani ta ti on District No. 7 of Orange Cow1ty and the Irvine Ranch Water District, wherein District No. 7 agrees to operate and maintain the local sewer collection system within the 176-acre residential area excluded from Annexation No. 39 -Irvine Industrial Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7, is AGENDA ITEM #9(t) 0-1 DISTRICT 7 hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That Lrvine Ranch Water District pay· Cotmty Sanitation District No. 7 for said services based on cost plus 15%; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of Cotmty Sanitation District No. 7 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 11, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #9(t) 0-2 DISTRICT 7 ._, .. RESOLUTION NO. 75-95-7 ORDERING ·M1NEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 39 -IRVINE INDUSTRIAL ANNEXATION) A RESOLlITION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 39 -IRVINE INDUSTRIAL ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7) * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, .DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to County Sanitation District No. 7 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a petition filed by the property owner; and, Section 2. That, pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of said territory to "cotmty Sanitation District No. 7 by means of Resolution No. 74-38-7, ~iled with said Commission by the District; and, Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 39 -(Irvine Industrial Annexation) to County Sanitation District No. 7", the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 4. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and, Section 5. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and provide sanitary sewer service to said territory; and, Section 6. That provision for payment of annexation fees in the amount of $135,150.84 has been satisfied; and, AGENDA ITEM #9(u) P-1 DISTRICT 7 Section 7. 1bat, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant ·to Division 1 (Distri~t Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 ~ of the Government Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described hereinabove, be and it is hereby ordered annexed to County Sanitation District No. 7 without notice or hearing and without election. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting hetd June 11, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #9(u) P-2 DISTRICT 7 . -. '-,'. . . I ••• •• i' ~' L'... .. ~ .' {. Board of Directors June 2, 1975 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY Attention lv\r. Fred A. Harper, Genera I /v\anager P. 0 . Box 8127 Fountain Va I ley, CA 92708 Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer Portion of Reach 12 and Reaches 13, 14, 15, an·d 16 Pursuant to Mr. Lewis' request; we are pleased to submit our proposal for furnishing professional engineering services for the preparation of final plans and specifications for subject trunk sewer as set forth in the preliminary engineering report dated February 1974. These reaches are a continuation of Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer sections currently under construction as Contracts Nos. 7-6-6 and 7-6-7. The trunk when completed wil I serve the centre I portion of the district north of the Santa Ana freeway and relieve the North Trunk Sewer which is presently flowing full. The project begins at the termination of Contract No. 7-6-7 at Fairhaven Avenue and Esplanade Avenue, runs easterly to Fairhaven Avenue and Esplanade Street, then northerly on Esplanade Street to Spring Street, easterly on Spring to Santiago Boulevard, then northerly on Santiago to Hewes Street, northerly on Hewes to Santiago Canyon Road, and then northeasterly on Santiago Canyon Road to the intersection of Linda Vista Street, where it will connect to existing city of Orange sewer facilities. Total length of the project is approximately 3.2 miles. The total estimated cost, which includes construction, ~ngineering, design surveying, construction staking, construction inspection, in-plant inspection, lega I and adm in i- strative, easement acquisition, and incidental costs, is $1,082,000. The preliminary engineering report for this facility has been reviewed by t~e city of Oraf"!ge and the county of Orange. Also, a draft environmenta I impact report for the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reaches 10 through 18, has been prepared, hearings held, and the environ- menta I impact report .certified by the district. It is proposed that construction of the project be accomplished under-two contracts. The remaining portion of Reach 12, Reach 13,. and a portion of Reach 14 would be Contract ·No. 7-6-8, beginning at Fairhaven Avenue and Esplanade Avenue and terminating at Spring Street and Santiago Boulevard. This contract would be coordinated with the AGENDA ITEM #9(v) Q-1 DISTRICT 7 County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County -2-June 2, 1975 county of Orange Road Department, which is proposing street improvements in an area bounded by Chapman Avenue, Esplanade Street, Spring Street, and Santiago Boulevard. The county work is being phased and at present it is proposed.to build the sewer in Esplanade Street north of Chapman and Spring Street this fa 11 prior to the roadway improve- ments by the county. The remaining portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 and 16 would constitute Contract No. 7-6-9, which would run from Santiago Boulevard and Spring Street to the end of the project at Linda Vista Street and Santiago Canyon Road. We will provide the following professional engineering services for the final plans and specifications and construction phases of the proposed project, based on two individua I contracts as outlined above. · 1. lv\ake arrangements for and_ coordinate fie Id surveys, gather benchmark data, existing surveys, etc. If pavement coring is required for final design, make arrangements for outside services. 2. Research underground utilities records. Includes both fie Id and office contacts with public and municipal utility companies. 3. As required to avoid conflicts between proposed project work and existing utilities, make arrangements for exploratory holes to expose existing utilities for position and elevation. Obtain excavation permits. Solicit prop.osals from contractors if district forc~s are not available for exploratory work. Contact city_ and county inspection departments. N\ark and s.urvey exposed utilities. 4. Prepare engineering data for regulatory permit applications that may be required by the city of Orange, Orange County Road Department, the Orange County Flood Control District, and the State Division of Highways. 5. Prepare detailed plans and specifications. 6. Review preliminary and final plans and specification·s with the city of Orange, Orange County Road Department, and the State Division of Highways. Receive traffic control, detour, and pavement replacement requirements. 7. Process final plans and specifications through State Division of Highways. 8. Process final plans through utility companies. 9. Process storm channel undercrossings through Orange County Flood C'antrol District. 10. Prepare estimates of quantities and costs. AGENDA ITEM #9(v) Q-2 DISTRICT 7 .' County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County -3-June 2, 1975 11. Deliver original tracings of plans and reproducible plates of the specifications for the district's use in preparing the necessary number of copies for record purposes and dis- tribution to prospective bidders, etc. 12. Prepare lega I descriptions and plats for right-of-way acqu is it ions as required for facility location and construction. 13. Assist the district in securing bids, in the tabulation and analysis of bid results, and in letting of the contract. 14. Attend pre~ward conferences with contractor, district staff, city of Orange, Ora~ge Coun.ty Road Department, and the State Division of Highways. 15. Check shop and working drawings as may be submitted by the contractor. 16. Review laboratory reports on material tests and inspection and correlate such reports with the intention of the plans and specifications. 17. Furnish consultation and advice to the district or its agent during construction. 18. Observe initial operation of the project, witnessing performance tests as required by the specifications~ and report same to the district. 19.. ~ke a fina I inspection and report of the completed project with a representative of the district or its agent. 20. · Prepare record drawings when construction work has been completed and accepted by the district. This shall mean the original tracings of the plans will be modified if necessary because of deviations from the original work. Since the district will carry out inspection of the project, modifications to the original tracings will be based upon information supplied to the engineer by the district. The origina I tracings, after modification, wil I become district property. Our total fee for the proposed project, including the preliminary engineering phase of the design and construction phase, is $59, 172. In accordance with our agreement for preliminary engineering study fees, we will credit $5,474 toward the total fee, leaving a remaining fee of $53,698. For district accounting purposes, we suggest the fee be divided as follows: $33,830 for Contract No. 7-6-8, and $19,868 for Contract No. 7-6-9. It is also suggested that payment be monthly on a percentage-complete basis up to 90 per- cent at time of delivery of plans and specifications, with 100 percent payment when work ~ is completed and accepted by the district. AGENDA ITEM #9(v) Q-3 DISTRICT 7 County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County -4-June 2, 1975 Field surveys will be required in order to prepare the plans and specifications. These surveys will include taking topography and culture within the project limits. We propose that all field surveys necessary for design be performed on a per diem basis at the following hourly rates: (1) three-man survey party -$60/hour, (2) two-man survey party -$48/hour, and (3) licensed surveyor -$22/hour. Payment is to be monthly as invoiced. If construction staking is requested, these rates will remain in effect until. June 30, 1976, at which time they would be subject to rev is ion • • We propose that all outside services required and approved by the district, such as pavement coring, pl~nt inspection for quality control, and materials used on the project construction, be paid directly by the district upon presentation of a statement for such outside services with the eng ineer 1 s certifications. If we are authorized to proceed .with this work at the June 11, 19.75, board meeting, we can have plans and specifications ready for advertising bids in October 1975 on Contract No. 7-6-8, and in January 1976 on Contract No. 7-6-9 .• BOYLE ENG !NEERING CORPORA TJON , ~\ I ,' I , ~ / ' . "/T.'r I (_,.( J.fj_,/. ,,. I\ ,,. ~, , " :...-t--' _/'i I.• /'-t.. ""''-' _.. . ~/~ Conrad Hohener, Jr., PE Vice President AGENDA ITEM #9(v) Q-4 DISTRICT 7 <EXCERPTED FROM. RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR MEETINGS) 8. CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION ·-A Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administra- tive Organ~zation shall be elected by a majority vote of the Districts at the regular meeting in July of each year. The Chairman and Vice Chairman shall serve at the pleasure of the majority of the Districts. The nominations for Joint Chairman shall be made at the regular Board meeting in June each year, and the nominees may prepare a statement of not more than 100 words stating their qualifications for the office of Chairman. These statements shall be mailed to the members of the Joint Boards of Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for the July regular meeting. AGENDA ITEM #13 -R-ALL DISTRICTS . ~ TL own• ¥fssoclates June 5, 1975 . Mr. Ray Lewis ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Yorba Linda Force Main Dear Mr. Lewis: On April 12, 1975, an inspection was made of the existing 24-inch Techite Pipe that was installed under the Orange Freeway in 1968 prior to the construction of the freeway. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the condition of the pipe and whether or not it can be used for a ·portion of the Yorba Linda Force Main. Plans ·of the in- stallation are entitled, "Construction Plans, Orange Free- way Crossings, 2-9-1, Cypress Avenue Relief Sewer and 2-2 Yorba Linda Force Main 11 Drawing No. 2-2P-207C, dated 6-12-68. As-built plans are dated 9-26-68. District personnel that were present at the inspection were Bill Clarke, Bruce Witcher, Marshall F~ires, and Bruce Taylor. Tim Pika of the Techite Pipe Company and Bob Barletta of the National Clay Pipe Institute were also present. ·An excavation was made between Stations 16+61 and 16+69. It.was possible to go down into the excavation and phy- sically examine the Techite Pipe. A deflectometer was placed into the pipe approximately 100 feet westerly to about Station 15+60 and pulled to the excavation at 16+60. It was obvious from looking at the pipe and from the de- flectometer readings that the pipe was badly distorted and deflected, both vertically and horizontally. Dis- placement at the joints was also evident. The deflecto- meter was set for a minimum 20-inch diameter reading. At one point the deflectometer reached the 20-inch reading and would have gone even lower had the gauge been able to do so. The.measured 4-inch deflection re- presents 16% deflection of the 24-i~ch pipe diameter. AGENDA ITEM #2S(a) S-1 10963 SAN DIEGO MISSION ROAD, SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92108 (714) 281-556? DISTRICT 2 r •. Mr. Ray Lewis ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT June 5, 1975 Page Two This is enough deflection to cause serious structural failing of the pipe. Based on these observations, in our opinion the use of this section of Techite Pipe would not be practical. In addition to the very poor condition of the Techite pipe, it is also smaller than required for the ultimate flow. The new planned force main is 30-inch in size rather than 24-:-inch. It is therefore reconunended that a new 30-inch ductile iron· pipe be installed within a jacked 48-inch casing pipe. The esti- mated cost is: 325 feet of 48-inch casing pipe.with 30-inch force main 325 feet at $300 per foot= $97,500.bO 265 feet at $47 per foot = $12,500.00 TOTAL= $110,000.00 The new 30-inch ductile iron force main will insure maximum reliability for. the entire installation. Veiy truly yours, LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES DJM:rtk Staff has reviewed this proposal indepth and concurs in the above recommendation. AGENDA ITEM #2S(a) S-2 DISTRICT 2 Copy to J·ws for June Agenda v hown !lfssoclates 121 Ga~I Wa6~inglon Avmu~, San/a Ana, Cal./ornia. 92701 (714} 541-5301 May 23, 1975 Board of Directors COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY P. o. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer Subject: Contract No. 2-16-2 Yorba Linda Force Main Gentlemen: As a result of the investigations conducted on the existing 24-inch techite pipe under the Orange Freeway, it has been concluded that a new force main will be needed to replace the techite pipe at this location. In accordance with your request, we are pleased to submit this proposal for providing ·engineering design services for the preparation of the plans and specifications for this reach of the Yorba Linda Force Main. We will perform the following professional engineering ser- vices for the project in accordance with the following: (1) Hold conferences with the District's staff, other interested agencies, and any private property owners who may be involved in the project to arrive at a mutually satisfactory ·alignment for the new force main. (2) Make arrangements for and coordination of field surveys, soils investigations and related work. (3) Assist in obtaining permits from the California Division of Highways and any other affected governmental agencies. AGENDA ITEM #2S(b) T-1 10963 SAN DIEGO MISSION ROAD, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92108 1714) 281-5567 DISTRICT 2 Board of Directors COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY May 2 3 , 19 7 5 . Page Two (4) Prepare legal descriptions and maps for any right-of-way acquisition that may be re- quired. (5) Prepare construction plans and specifications and integrate the project into the remaining portion of the Yorba Linda Force Main, Contract 2-16-2, and provide all other en- gineering services as previously described for that project in accordance with our proposal dated July 31, 1973. We propose to provide the above services for a basic fee of $4,200, and further propose that payment of the design fees be monthly on a percentage-completed basis up to 90% at the time of delivery of the plans and specif1cations, and 100% payrne~t when the work is completed and accepted by the District. All other work such as field surveys for construction staking, .soils investigations, and any other outside ser- vices required and approved by the District staff, will be in accordance with our original proposal dated July 31, 1973, for the other portion of the Yorba Linda Force Main and as amended by our letter dated September 13, 1973, in regard to survey rates. If authorization is given to proceed at the June Board Meeting, the plans for the entire Yorba Linda Force Main project can be completed for the Board Meeting in July. Very truly yours, LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES /(eL,cc/ J};aiL/,:1r.-- DONALD /~RTINSON DJM:rtk AGENDA ITEM #2S(b) T-2 DISTRICT 2 . . VALUATION CONSULTANTS• REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS bmiw@S S E. GOODE. SR. MAI (1888 • 1972> S £. COOD[. JR , MAI G E. SCHMITZ. MAI County Sanitation Districts. of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 108·44 Ellis Avenue ·Fountain Valley, CA 92708 June 5. 1975 Attention: Mr. Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer HE: Trunk Sewer Easements/County Sanitation District No. 7. Job No. 7-6-7 Proposed S~ttlement -Appraisal Recommendation Gentlemen: At your request, we have reviewed your letter of May 29, 1975 addressed to Southern Pacific Transportation Company, outlining the basis of the proposed right-of-way settlement. The purpose of our review has been to formulate a recommendation concerning this settlement proposal, after careful consideration of the nature of the ease-:- ment sought, the property affected, and the alternatives available. Accurate judgment as to the adequacy of the terms of settlement outlined must take into con side ra ti.on the following factors: 1. The railroad property is classified as operational, thus precluding right of entry through an order of immediate possessiono A long delay may occur before a right of entry could be obtained through the complex legal channels necessary in this situationo 2. The alternate route available utilizing Holt Avenue would eliminate right-of-way costs and delays, but dollar savings would be eliminated and costs would be increased in the overall due to the added length of the right-of-way, and construction costs connected therewith. (See .Boyle Engineering Company Preliminary Engineering Report, page 17.) 3. The sums called for as permanent right-of-way acquisition costs and rent for temporary right-of-way·construction purposes are reasonable, and under ·the circumstances favorable to the District's position. AGENDA ITEM #28 (a) U-1 DISTRICT 7 1840 L Seventeenth SIH•ct •Suite 130, Santa Ana. Calif~miia 9270 l •Telephone (·714) 835-G.78·1 . -. , I County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 2 June 5. 1975 In the absence of our completed appraisal, we are not prepared to state a specific market value for the easement areas. It is clear, however, from the information that we have developec;l to date, that these amounts set forth in your letter are re.asonable. We therefore recommend. that the District proceed with the settlement as proposed in your May 29, 1975 letter to the Southern Pacific Transportation Company. Sincerely, ·--I/ 1 7 ·;),/. ·, /.; /' Stanley Eo Goode, Jr., MAI-CHE sf AGENDA ITEM #28(a) U-2 DISTRICT 7 ,. " ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. TELEPHONES: ARC:A CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 P. O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) Mr. J • F. Mc A 11 i st er Ass)stant Division Engineer ·Southern Pacific Transp~rtation Company 610 South Main Street Los Angeles, California 90014 May 29, 1975 Attention: Hr.· R. L. Stacy, Assistant to District Manager Subject: Permanent and Temporary Trunk Sewer Easements for County Sanitation District No. 7 -Job No. ·7-6-7 Pursuant to our recent meeting concerning the desires of County Sanitation District No. 7 to acquire 1.3546 acres of permanent easements for a portion of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer and the temporary use of a portion of the Southern Pacific right-of-way in the unincorporated territory of the County of .Orange from Irvine Boulevard to a point southerly of Fairhaven Avenue as shown on the attached maps, on behalf of the Sanitation District I would like to propose the following: 1. That the Southern Pacific Land Company dedicate to the County Sanitation District No. 7, 1.3546 acres of permanent easement for the construction, operation and maintenance of that portion of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer designated as Job No. 7-6-7 in the lump sum amount of $40,000. 2. That the Sanitation District and the Southern Pacific Company· enter into a rental agieement wherein the District would pay to the Southern Pacific the sum of $300 per acre per month for that portion of the temporary easement used by the District's contractor during the construction period. Said rental would only be applicable during that period of time and for the particular area required by the contractor. 3. That the Sanitation District, with the cooperation of your office, obtain necessary approvals from the San Diego Pipeline Company for the construction of said trunk sewer. If these conditions meet with your approval, this office in conjunction with the District's appraiser, will recommend this to the District's Board of AGENDA ITEM #28(b) V-1 DISTRICT 7 ' . , , Mr. J. F. McAllister Southern Pacific Transportation Company May 29, 1975 Page Two COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVlNU[ FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (71.C) 962-2411 Directors at their regular Board Meeting of June 11th. It is hoped that this can be agreed upon on or before July 1, 1975 in order th~t the District's contractor can proceed with the execution of the work as outlined. in the contract for the above-mentioned job. REL: hj e cc: Thomas ·L. Woodruff AGENDA ITEM #28(b) V-2 DISTRICT 7 ... " -~ June 5, 1975 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFO RN IA P. 0. BOX 8127 108H ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (7 14) 962-2411 REPORT OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON INDU STRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE Meeting Date: June 4, 1975 Members present: Henry Duke, Chairman, John Burton, Michael Callahan, Dale Chaput , Howard Rogers Members absent: Bernie Svalstad Others pres~nt: Frank Ellwell, Surplate; Walker Downs, Anodyne; B~ll Snyder, Embee Plating Staff present: Fred A. Harper, Ray E. Lewis, John Thomas, Hilary Eitzen Convened: Adjourned: 7:30 p.m. 9:30 p .m. **************** General Review by Staff -The staff -briefly reviewed the development of the existing and proposed ordinances with special emphasis on the manner in which the existing excess ·capacity charge provisions of both ordinances were developed. In addition , the Committee was apprised of the requirements of the Federal Water Pollution Contrbl Act , known as Publ i c Law 92-500. The excess capacity charge provisions of the current ordinance is not accept - able to the State and EPA as far as a revenue pro gram is concerned. The underlying philosophy in Public Law 92 -500 is to create equity whereby the user pays in accordance with his use of the sewer system . This applies to operation and maintenance costs as well as capital recovery. The staff presented the following figures which have b een averaged for all Districts : Current costs per million gallons (average all 7 Districts): 0 & M Capital Recov. $ 66.00 204.00 $270.00 These figures do not include d~bt retirement which will con- tinue to be amo·rtized by ad valorem taxes. Alternatives Considered by the Committee -Six alternatives for capital recovery were presented by the staff to the Corruni ttee. (1) Districts continue to utilize ad valorem taxes as the major source of revenue, but collect for excessive use by the current formula for excess capacity using peak flow based on 1971 figu res - $350/1000 gallons peak flow · (2) Districts continue to utilize ad valorem taxes as the major source of revenue, but collect for excessive use by the formula for excess capac ity using average flow based on 1971 figures -$350/1 000 gallons average flow · (3) Districts continue to utilize ad valorem taxes as the major source of revenue, but ·collect for excessive use by the formula ~or exc~ss capacity using peak flow based on 1974 figures -$556 per thousand gallons of peak flow (4) Districts continue to utilize ad valorem·taxes .as the major source of revenue; but co l lect for excessive use by the formula for excess capacity using average flow based on 1974 figur es -$556 per thousand gallons (5) A modified user charge employing a revenue program which continues· to utilize a d valo rem taxes as the major source of r e v e nue but co ll ects main t enance and operation costs plus a capital recovery charge from dischargers exceeding 2 .5 million g~llons per year with credits for ad valorem ta ~es paid the District s (6) Eliminate ad valorem taxes as the major re venue source a nd charge each sewer user an annua l charge based on the costs for ga llonage discharged regard- less of classification, i.e., ~esidential, corrunercial, or industrial. Advantages and Disadvantages of the Various Alternatives: Alternativ es 1 through 4 essentially support the current and proposed method of collecting a one-t i me excess capacity charge and provide s ubsidie s for firms discharging prior to 1971 . In addition to the one-time charges developed by the excess capacity formulas, the .Di strict would continue to collect opera- tions ~nd maintenance costs which are currently projected to be $66/million gallons. -2- --. ~ The advantage to the user is that it is a one-time charge for excess capacity as long as his flows do not increaie. If the user was in operation prior to 1971, he may not be. charged for excessive use of the sewer system. The disadvantages are that many users are being subsidized by other tax~ayers. For those users who haVe established ~ high capacity right ~ithout payment there is no incentive for water conservation. Alternative No. 5 -The modified user charge would employ a fixed annual capital charge per million gallons of $125 for capital· recovery, plus the gallonage charge for operations and maintenance (0 & M), which will vary annually. The current projection is $66 per million gallons for 0 & M. This charge will apply to all dischargers exceeding 2~ million gallons per year with credits to be applied for ad valorem taxes paid related to District 0 &· M and capital recovery. This system of charging approaches the State and Federal approved revenu~ program if ad valorem taxes are permitted as the major source of reve n ue. There is a semblance of equity, in that all dischargers exceed - ing 2~ million gallons per year will pay 'for their excessive use of the sewer system. · Tho se businesses and/or industries current ly immune to charges because of the grandfather clause in the current ordinance will have to pay in accordance with t heir use of the sewer system. Business and industry will be partially subsidized by establishing the fixed $1 25/million g a l l o n s fo r capital recovery over an extended period of t ime . The charge s will promote water conservation and encourage quant i t y and quality control by dischargers . Alternative No . 6 -User charge where everyone is charged based on the costs for the gallons discharged, r e gard le ss o f classification, resid e ntial, commercial, or i n dus t rial .. Th is type of charge system would eliminate ad valorem taxes as the major revenue source. The advantage of this type of p r o gr am . is that the user would pay costs in relations h ip to actual u se . This program is endorsed by the State and Federal Governme nts . The disadvantages are that we have approximately 350,000 sewer connections within our Districts and the cos t s to administer such a program would exceed half a million dollars per year, with no particular benefit relative to water quality. We do no t have any estimate as to what the costs would be to s et up such a billing system. It would also shift costs to many disad v antag ed persons; property owners with low ass e ssed valuations would pay sub stantially more than they are paying now. The low volum e dischar g er would p a y . -3- less. We would anticipate a high' delinquency in collections and a long period of adjustment, both for the Districts and the public. Committee Recommendation -Following a discussion concerning the vari ous alternatives and the advantages and disadvantages of the various proposals, the comm ittee members ·present unanimously agreed that the modified user charge, Alternate No. 5, should be explored with the industrial community, as it appears to pro- vide substantial equity among users as well as promote water conservation. In addition, this method should generate, in the long run, sizeable funds for capital improvem~nts, operations , and maintenance thereby reducing other tax.payers' c.os·ts. Therefore, the Committee recommends that the Boards of · Direct ors authdrize the Districts! staff to hold informal hear ings with the Chambers of Commerce and r epresentatives of the industrial community within the Districts for their input and reaction to a modifi ed user charge r evenue program which continues to utilize ad valorem taxes as the major source of revenue but collects maintenance and operation costs plus a fixed capital recovery . charge of $125 per million gallons from dischargers exceeding 2~ million gallons per year ·with applied credits for ad valorem taxes paid the District. -4- . EXCESS CAPACITY CHARGES ALT. #1 ALT. #2 Using Peak Flow Using Ave. Flow ComEan;y: and 1970 Rates and 1970 Rates $350/1000 gals. $350/1000 gals. A $14,470 : $ 8,995 B $85,750 $53,550 c $10,815 $ 1,610 In addition, the Districts will continue to collect operations and maintenance costs which are currently projected to be $66 per million gallons. ALT.#3 Using Peak Flow and 1974 Rates $556/100 gals. $ 23,485 ~136,347 $ 17, 197 ALT. #4 ALT. #5 Using Ave. Flow Capital Recovery $125/mg and 1974 Rates (Annual Charge) $556/1000 gals $14,303 $ 1,569/yr. ' . $85,148 $_29,470/yr. $ 2,560 $11,793/yr. I_ • . . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) June 9, 1975 Mr. Gordon Wood Committee on Public Works and Transportation House of Representatives 2165 Rayburn Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 . Dear Gordon: . . Thank you for· your call this morning relative to some Committee hearings late this month or in July, concerning possible amendments of compliance dates in PL 92-500. TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 For your information, I am enclosing a proposed definition ·or best practicable waste treatment for publicty-owned treatment works discharging into territorial seas which our agency submitted to EPA's Task Force on Secondary Treatment of Municipal Ocean Discharges in June, 1974. You will note that the definition does not address ~tself to EPA's BOD requirements, as oxygen depletion is not a concern for ocean discharges. The emphasis is on potential toxic substances, suspended solids, turbidity, grease, ~nd oil. · I am'also enclosing a report entitled "Alternatives for Improved Treatment", which compares the costs of conventional secondary treatment for our agency, $275.8 million vs. $113.8 million to meet the criteria established in our proposed definition of best practicable waste treatment (BPT). It is our contention that discharges through deep ocean outfalls meeting our definition of BPT have no serious adverse effects on the marine enviro~ment and, in many instances; will have beneficial effects by increasing the nutrient levels around the outfalls to a degree comparable to th~ naturally-occurring levels achieved through upwelling. I have asked Willard Bascom, Director of the Southern California AGENDA ITEM No. 6-(B) -... Mr. Gordon Wood June 9, 1975 Page 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71"> s .. 0-2910 (71 .. ) 962-2-411 Coastal Water Research Project to comment on the limita- tions we have set forth in our proposed definition of BPT. FAH:j Enclosures Fred A. Harper General Manager Mr. Willard Bascom, Director, SCCWRP, w/BPT Booklet Mr. Lee C. ·White, Legal Counsel, AMSA COPIES TO COMMITTEE MEMBERS ONLY. ~ REPORT OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON I.NDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE WAS · INCLUDED IN THE AGENDA MATERIAL WHICH WAS MAILED JUNE 5TH. BRIEFLY) THE COMMITTEE CONSIDERED 6 ALTERNATIVES FOR CAPITAL RECOVERY AND DISCUSSED THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE VARIOUS ALTER- NATIVES. WE HAVE ENCLOSED IN YOUR FO~DERS TONIGHT A BREAKDOWN OF THE EXCESS CAPACITY CHARGES FOR THREE COMPANIES) BASED ON 5 OF THE 6 ALTERNATIVES PRESENTED. You WILL NOTE THAT A~TERNATIVES 1 THROUGH 4) WHICH ARE ONE-TIME CHARGES) VARY GREATLY DEPENDING ON THE BASIC CRITERIA USED FOR EACH CALCULATION. ALTERNATIVE 5· IS BASED ON THE ACTUAL FLOW USE OF THE SEWER SYSTEM BY .EACH OF THE COMPANIES. THE ANNUAL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE COSTS WHICH ARE CURRENTLY BUDGETED TO BE $66 PER MILlION GALLONS WOULD BE ADDED IN EACH CASE. THE COMMITTEE REALIZES THAT MANY FIRMS WHICH PRESENTLY ARE NOT SUBJECT TO ANY CAPITAL CHARGES OTHER THAN WHAT THEY PAY THROUGH AD VALOREM TAXES WILL NOW PAY ANNUAL CAPITAL RECOVERY CHARGES IF ALTERNATIVE 5 IS ADOPTED BY THE BOARDS. CURRENTLY) OTHER TAXPAYERS ARE SUB- SIDIZING THEIR USE OF THE SEWER SYSTEM. ESSENTIALLY) WE ARE LOOKING AT A CHARGE OF APPROXIMATELY $200 PER MILLION GALLONS) WHICH INCLUDES OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLUS A FIXED CAPITAL RECOVERY CHARGE OF $125 PER MILLION GALLONS FOR ANY DISCHARGES EXCEEDING 2~ MILLION GALLONS PER YEAR. EACH DISCHARGER WILL RECEIVE CREDIT FOR AD VALOREM TAXES PAID THE DISTRICT. FoR THE PAST TWO YEARSJ THE Los ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS HAVE CHARGED $230 PER MILLION GALLONS FOR THE AVERAGE INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGE. THE STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT THE $200 PER MILLION GALLON CHARGE WILL BE BROKEN DOWN: 70% FOR FLOWJ· 20% FOR SUSPENDED SOLIDSj AND 10% FOR BODJ SO THATJ DEPENDING ON THE TYPE OF DISCHARGEJ EACH INDUSTRY'S COSTS WILL VARY DEPENDING ON WHAT THEY PUT IN THE SEWER. WE BELIEVE THAT THIS APPROACH WILL PROVIDE SUBSTANTIAL EQUITY AMONG USERS;. IT WILL PROMOTE WATER CONSERVATIONJ AND WE BELIEVE IT WILL GO A LONG WAY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SOURCE-CONTROL PROVISIONS OF THE ORDINANCEJ IN THATJ THE DISCHARGER WILL BE EXTREMELY COGNIZANT OF. WHAT GOES IN THE SEWER BECAUSE IT WILL COST HIM MONEY, THE COMMiTTEE RECOMMENDS THAT THE BOARDS AUTHORIZE THE STAFF · TO HOLD .INFORMAL HEARINGS WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE AND THE INDUSTRIAL COMMUN I TY FOR THE I.R INPUT AND REACT I ON TO A MODIFIED USER CHARGE REVENUE SYSTEM AS RECOMMENDED IN THE COMMITTEE'S JUNE 5TH REPORT. 1 2 3 AGREEMENT ---------FOR SALE OF DIGESTED SEWAGE SOLIDS THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this ---day of 4 , 1975, by and between COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 6 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County and on its own behalf, 7 hereinafter referred to as "District", and JEANNE L. EDDOWS, an 8 individual, dba ALART COMPANY, hereinafter called "Company"; 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ·28 WITNESS E.T H: WHEREAS, District is organized and existing under and by virtue of the provisions of the County Sanitation District Act, Chapter 250, Statutes of 1923, as amend~d (California Health and Safety Code Section 4700 et seq.), and WHEREAS, District is a public agency organized for the purpose, among others, of operating and maintaining sewage treat- rnent plants for treating and disposing of sewage under and pur- suant to the provisions of said County. Sanitation District Act, and WHEREAS, District has constructed and is operating two inter- connected sewage treatment plants located in the Cities of Fountain valley and Huntington Beach, California, hereinafter calJ.ed "Plant No. 1 11 and "Plant No. 2" respectively, and WHEREAS, District produces a by-product in its treatment of the sewage wastewater which consists of digested sewage solids hereinafter referred to as "sludge", and WHEREAS, said Company is familiar with commercial uses of "sludge" and did on December 17, 1974, submit a proposal to l County Sanitation District No. 1 Board of Directors setting 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 forth a detailed plan for the utilization of all District digest · sewage solids produced as a result of the District's wastewater treatment operations, and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of said Sanitation District did, at an adjourned meeting on December 19, 1974, acting upon recommendation from staff, declare its intent to enter into this agreement for the sale of said digested sewag~ solids to Company within the conditions contained in said proposal which are amenable to the Districts' operations, and WHEREAS, an agreement was made and entered into by and be- tween District and Company on February 20, 1975, and was sub- sequently amended by execution of the First Amendment to Agreement on April 10, 1975, and WHEREAS, certain disagreements and misunderstandings arose by and between the parties pertaining to the terms and conditions of the above-referenced agreement, and WHEREAS, Districts served a notice of rescission of the above- referenced agreement on May 6, 1975, which notice of rescission was ratified by action of the Board of Directors of District on May 14, 1975, and WHEREAS, at the request of Company, Districts reconsidered their action of May 14, 1975, at their regular adjourned meeting of May 29, 1975, and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of District on May 29, 1975, 26 · authorized an award of a short term agreement with Company for 27 28 purposes of sludge removal and reevaluation, subject to certain terms and conditions, including the execution of a mutual -2- 1 cancellation of the agreement of February 20, 1975, as amended 2 on April 10, 1975. 3 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual 4 agreements hereinafter set forth, it is agreed as follows: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. In consideration for the execution of this new agreement and the surrender of any and all rights arising out of the failure to comply with the terms of said agreement dated February 20, 1975, as amended April 10, 1975, parties hereto hereby expressly agree to rescind said previous agreements in each and every respect and to waive all rights which may accrue to the respective parties thereunder. 2. The term of this agreement shall be for a period of ninety (90) days from the date of execution by both parties. 3. Obligations of Districts A. The Districts shall centrifuge all digested solids at Plant No. 1. The centrifuged solids shall be placed in hopper containers by Districts which can be readily loaded for transport to Plant No. 2 area for processing. There will be no sewage solids diverted to open air sludge drying beds at Plant No. 1 as a part of normal operations. On an infrequent basis, material may be directed to the sludge drying beds at Plant No. 1 during a digester cleaning operation. Except for transport of digested sludge from Plant No. 1 to Plant No. 2, the Districts will not allow the processing of any digested sludge by Company at Plant No. 1. B. The Districts anticipate the centrifuging of approximately 60 to 100 percent of the sludge volume at Plant No. 2. All material in the sludge drying beds, as well -3- l the centrifuge cake, will be made available to Company. The centrifuge 6ak~ produced will.vary in con~isten~y from approxi- mately 18 percent solids to 26 percent solids. In the District operations there may be times when polymer additions may be used in order to recover more solids from the withdrawals from the anaerobic digesters. C. District will make available certain areas located at Plant No. 2 for sludge drying, handling and processing 9 in a manner determined appropriate by Company and which is 10 acceptable to District. These areas are more particularly 11 1 defined and set forth on a print map of P.lant No. 2, attached I 12 hereto as Exhibit 11 A 11 and incorporated herein by reference. 4. Obligations of Company ~ I I 13 14 A. Company shall establish and continuously main- I 1511 16 II 17 . 18 19 20 21 22 23 I 24 I I 25 I 26 I I tain in operation an approved windrow drying system in the area noted on Exh:j..bit 11 A" as "North No. 1 11 • The establishment of this system must be commenced immediately upon execution of the agree- ment. B. Company shall establish and continuously main- tain in operation an approved windrow drying system in the area noted on Exhibit 11 A11 as "South No. l". The establishment of this 1 I I system must be commenced immediately upon execution of the agree- ment. Company shall complete the emptying of the 1' drying bed noted on Exhibit "A" as "Middle No. l" by July 18, 1975., c. D. · Company shall empty the dry~ng beds at Plant I i 27 I No. 2 shown on Exhibit "A" as · .. Middle No. 2", North No. 1, North I '-" 28 No. 2, North No. 3 and North No. 4 by September 15, 1975. The I -4- 1 emptying of these beds shall be done in the sequence set forth in 2 this paragraph, commencing with Middle No. 2. 3 E. All drying beds which have not had sludge 4 added for thirty .('30) days shall be considered to be in the 5 "process of drying". All such beds in the "process of drying" 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 . 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ·28 shall be 11 walked 11 at least once per week by Company personnel to assist in the drying operation. F. Company further agrees to hold District free and harmless from any and all liabilities, claims, obligations and costs, including attorney's fees and other costs of defending suits and claims that may be brought against the District by reason of Company's operations. G. Company will provide District with trucking receipts or tickets for all sludge removed from District's pre- mises, showing the volume of sludge removed; these receipts shall be delivered to District on a daily basis. 5. Company agrees to conduct its sludge removal business in compliance with all applicable governmental rules and regula- tions and agrees not to create or maintain a nuisance. 6. Company shall not commence any work under this contract until it has obtained all insurance required in the per- formance of its responsibilities and in a form acceptable to the District. Company shall take out and maintain at all times during the contract the following policies of insurance: A. Worker's Compensation Insurance -The Company shall pro~1ide such compensation insurance as required by the Labor Code of the State of California. The Company shall require all subcontractors similarly to provide such compensation insurance -5- l for all of the latters' employees. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 B. Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance The Company shall carry and maintain insurance coverage for public liability and property damage on account of bodily injuries, including. death resulting therefrom, in the sum of not less than $1,000,000 for one person and $3,000,000 for more than one person, and property damage in the sum of not less than $500,000 resulting from any one accident which may arise from the operation of the Company in the performance of the work that is provided for herein. C. Motor Vehicle Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance -The Company shall carry and maintain a motor vehicle public liability and property damage insurance coverage on each automobile, truck and other vehicle which is used in the performance of the contrac~ in an amount of not less than $200,000 for one person and $500,000 for more than one person and property damage in the sum of not less than $100,000 resulting from any one accident which_may arise from the operation of the Company in·the performance of the work that is provided for here- in. 7. The District also requires that said insurance coverage obtained by the Company, excepting Worker's Compensation coverage, shall name the District and all entities from whom permits to do the work are required, as additional insureds. The Company shall furnish a Certificate of Waiver of Subrogation under the terms of the Worker's Compensation Insurance. 8. Company shall be apprised that it completely under- stands that it must be responsible to secure all business license8 city of Huntington Beach building permits, pay for any taxes and ·-6- ' ' "' 1 comply with any Federal, State, County and City law or ordinance 2 which may be applicable to the Company's operation. District 3 will be responsible to secure all necessary and applicable Air 4 Pollution Centro~ District's construction and operating permits. 5 Any conditions set forth in any permits secured by District will 6 be a requirement which must be fulfilled by the Company at its 7 expense. 8 9. For all sludge removed from District's premises, 9 the Company shall pay to the District the sum of Fifty Cents 10 ($.50) per cubic yard. Said sums shall be paid within thirty (30) 11 days of removal. To guaranty this payment, Company agrees to 12 provide security in a form approved by General Counsel of the 13 District, prior to the execution o·f this agreement. · 14 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, JEANNE L. EDDOWS, dba ALART COMPANY, and 15 the Chairman and the Secretary of the District, by Resolu~ion 16 No. of the Board of Directors of said District, there- 17 unto duly authorized, have caused their names to be affixed hereto, 18 each in triplicate, the date and year first above written. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 -28 APPROVED AS TO FORM: General Counsel JEANNE L. EDDOWS, an individual dba ALART COMPANY Jeanne L. Eddows COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, of Orange County, California, a public corporation Chairman, Board of Directors Secretary, Board of Directors -7- RESOLUTION NO. 75-96 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 75-17 (POSITIONS AND SALARIES) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TifE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING POSITIONS AND SALARIES RESOLUTION NO. 75-17 * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, Db HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Exhibit "D" of Resolution No. 75-17 is hereby amended to add position classification thereto, or adjust salary ranges for position classifications thereof, for the Joint Administrative Organization, as follows: A. OPERATIONAL PERSONNEL Approximate Biweekly Monthly Range or Equivalent Classification Position Classification No. Hourly Salary 90300 Assistant to the Chief Engineer 354A 520.00-640.80 1127/1389 80100 Principal Laboratory & Research 353A 494.40-608.80 1071/1319 Analyst 80300 Laboratory Associate 352 464.00-570.40 1005/1235 80200 Senior Laboratory & Research Analyst 351C 457.60-562.40 992/1219 80400 Laboratory Analyst II 349C 412.80-507.20 895/1099 80600 Laboratory Analyst I 348A 383.20-469.60 831/1018 80700 Laboratory Technician 346C 356.00-434.40 771/942 00000 Helper 4.00/hr. Max. c. ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL Approximate Biweekly Monthly Range or Equivalent ~assification Position Classification No. Hourly Salary 10250 Assistant to the Chief of Personnel 354A 520.00-640.80 1127/1389 Division 10260 Assistant to the Director of 354A 520.00-640.80 1127 /13B9 Finance 10300 Assistant to the Secretary of 350B 429.60-S27.20 930/1142 the Boards 10240 Administrative Assistant 349C 412.80-507.20 895/1099 10380 Lead Storeskeeper 349C 412.80-507.20 895/1099 D. SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 10100 Principal Accountant 59C 664.00-827.20 1438/1792 00600 Senior Facilities Supervisor S9C 664.00-827.20 1438/1792 80000 Laboratory Director S9A 646.40-804.80 1400/1743 00000 Facilities Supervisor SBA 611. 20-761. 60 1324/1650 70100 Chief Operator SBA 611. 20-761. 60 1324/1650 Section 2. That Exhibit "D" of Resolution No. 7S-17 is hereby amended by the deletion therefrom of the following position classification: D. SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL BOOOO Laboratory Supervisor 57C 594.40-740.80 1288/160S Section 3. That Resolution No. 7S-17 is hereby amended by the addition of Exhibit "E" dated July, 197S; and, Section 4. That Exhibit "E" dated January, 1975, is hereby rescinded; and, Section 5. That any other resolution or motion or portions thereof that conflict herewith are hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and, Section 6. That this resolution shall become effective July 4, 1975. -2- FORCE ACCT ( I EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE I I DIR OF FINANCE & SEC TO BOARDS 36 I <29) ADl'llN &-FIN#\ru.t. Ut.l"I PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL SENIOR PROC & ACCOUNTANT ACCOUNTANT PROP CHIEF ASS'T TO CHIEF OF PERSONNEL L STRUC- TURES DIG ES- TERS GROUNDS 24 (21) COLL FACL FACILITIES SUPERVISOR I SEWERS PUMP STATIONC COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SU1",M.ARY ORG,;1i I z.:.. TIC ~AL CHART f'ITCE I JULY, l~75 (REVISED) BOARDS OF 0 I RECTORS 273 (217) GENERAL AANAGER 20".l \I :>OJ : OPER & LABORATORY DEPT~ 19 I 061 LAB & R£SEARCH SR FACL SUPV UPER ENGINEER 43 (32) MECH FACL FACILITIES SUPERVISOR I I SHOP & Fl XED MOBILE EQUIP EQUIP . FACILITIES SUPERVISOR I NSTRU- HHHS ELECT CHIEF OPERATOR TR1'1T PLANT OPER I 6ACT LAB LABORATORY .DI RECTOR I I CHEM I 1 NOUST LAB I WASTE LAU I CHIEF ENGINEER I MARINE SPECIAL COl",f'll TTEES CHIEF OF INOUST & PERMIT £COLOGY PERMIT & C.OllN ( EXHIBIT"£" I GEN'L COUUSEL ~.ti I (29) _!li~INEERING DEPT SENIOR ENG I NEER PLANT CON~TR MAPS & HAFTING SENIOR ENGlflEER DIST COtlSTR I RES MGMT CLIHLk . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. DOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVE NU E FOUNTAIN. VALLEY, CALIFOR NI A 92708 (714) 540-2910 (7 I 4) 962-2411 May 29, 1975 M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager FROM: W. N. Clarke, Superintendent SUBJECT: Utilization of "Helper" Positions Wi thin the Operating and Maintenance Departments $4 .00/Max ., Approximately $700/Morith Projects/Plant Maintenance -Division 20/30 (3) Positions could be utilized f or grounds- keeping and general plant maintenance d~ties Mech~nical -Divisi6n 50 (2) Po~ition s could be utilized fa~ equipment cleaning Operations -Division 70 (2) Positions could be.utilized f or assistance in solids dewatering operation Laborat ory -Division 80 (1) Position could be utilized for gener_al lab cleanup and assistance in NPDES work June 5, 1975 NOTE: Pursuant -to a brief discussion by the Ex ecutive Committee on May 29th re garding the utilization of "helper " positions within the Op era tin g and Maintenance Departments, if approved , we will revi se the organization .chart t o -establish helper positions as shown abo ve. · 'l1 llis doe s not add a ny ad d itio!}a l p e r so n nel t o the District~' compleme nt, but will p e rmit the hirin g of new employees at l ower beginning salaries. ·~ R E P 0 R T S O·N C 0 N ST RU CT I 0 N I N. P R 0 G RES S . A-S 0 F J u N E l I l 9 7 5 ' . PROGRESS REPORT TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY., CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 P2-20 -POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT PLANT NO. 2 -($158,294) Job complete. Pl-16 -46 MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 -($29,876,000) Project work continues without major problems. Concrete placement is estimated to be 75% complete. Blower building main floor slab is now under construction. Walls will follow. Aeration basin top decks are presently being cast. This work will continue for three months. Secondary clarifier progressing rapidly. Structural work is expecte<l to be completed by September. Digester dome work is underway and will continue through the month. Precast walls in the electrical distribution building are being erected. Concrete pipe work is progressing slowly Structural work on this project can be considered ahead of schedule. Mechanical work is behind. PW-035 -ADDITIONAL BOILER FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2 -($39,047) Job is complete. Progress Report Treatment Plants Page Two TREATMENT PLANT WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During May DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During May Total Work Under Design TOTAL AMOUNT UNDER CONTRACT AND DESIGN June 5, 1975 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,. CALIFORNIA 9270e (714) 540-2910 ~ $30,073,342 14,334,043 1,587,094 $22,152,204 12,317,135 1,036,033 10,088,068 (714) 962-2411 $30,073,342 $2.2,152,204 10,088,068 $62,313,614 I ' CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT MAY, 1975 YORBA LINDA PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 2-15 CONTRACTOR: J. PUTNAM HENCK, A CORPORATIQN & HENCK PRO, A JOINT VENTURE CONTRACT PRICE: $671, 146. 00 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (71.C) 962-2411 STARTING DATE: SEPT. 1974 COMPLETION DATE: SEPT. 1975 Contraat is for the aonstruction of a reinforced concrete structure to house wet wells and pwnps for transferri_ng tributary wastewater through a force main line into the Santa Ana River, Carbon Canyon Interceptor-relief Trunk Line system for conveyance to Wastewater Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. This will assist in relieving the presently .congested ~'filler-Holder Trunk Line and will serve proposed land use development of the tributariJ area to the year 2010. The wastewater from this pump 3tation will enter the trunk line system through the junction of the Carbon Canyon Interceptor, Reach 2 and the Kraemer Boulevard Interceptor lines at the intersection of Palm Drive and Kraemer ~oulevard in Placentia. The pwnp station structure is located at the intersection of Yorba Linda. Boulevard and Associated Road in Fullerton. It is being constructed on what was originally University of California, Fullerton property at the northern perimeter of the campus. Special arrangements were m::ide with the University for acquisition of the property. The ohove-ground portion of the Btructure wi U be a low profile building 85' x 109 ', with the entrance faced away from Yorba Linda Boulevard. The deepest portion of the structure will be 35' under the ground~ The District has agreed to landBcape the bui Zding area in accordance with future compatable use by the University. The University plans to construct an arboretum in the immediate area at some future date • . Pump room and lower wet well walls have been completed and forms removed. Backfill has been placed up to within two fee~ of the motor room floor level. Inside casting forms for the motor room and the upper portion of the wet wells have been erected. The pump room stairway has been cast. Installation of plastic liner plate in the lower portion of the wet wells was underway until the project engineer rejected the work as unsatisfactory due to misalignment of "weep channels". These are cut-in paths designed to allow accumulated moisture free flow to the bottom of the wet well. The sub-contractor last worked on the job on May 29th. No word has been received ~f his intentions since that time. ~ . Pacific Telephone has completed installation of telemetering wiring for the pump station. ·coNSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT MAY,. 1975 Courhv SANITATION D1sTRICT$ of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 KRAEMER BOULEVARD INTERCEPTOR SEWER CONTRACT NO. 2-16-1 (714) 962-2411 CONTRACTOR: GEORGE MILLER CONSTRUCTION CO. STARTING DATE: JUNE 1975 CONTRACT PRICE: $570~586.80 COMPLETION DATE: MID OCT. 1975 Contraet is for instaUation of 23" vitrified eZay pipe (V.C.P.) along Kraemeri BouZevarid from Palm Drive in Plaeentia to Imperial Highway in Brea, an apprioximate distanee of 1.5 miles. This projeet is part of the Santa Ana River, Carbon Canyon Intereeptor-relief system, designed, in part, to divert flows from the north portion of ·Distriet 2, relieving the presently eongested Newhope-Plaeentia trunk Zine to Wastewater Reelamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. The southerly terminus of the interieeptor-reZief system is at the diversion striueture at Plant No. 1. The Santa Ana River Intereeptor, Reaeh 1. (eontraets 2-14-1 and 2-14-2) begins at this point, and is eompleted to the intersection of G1-;ove Street and La Palma Avenue in Anaheim. This seetion was eonstrueted during the period from Noverriberi 19?2 to January 1975. The Caribon Canyon Intereeptor (Contraet 2-18) eonneets at this point, lies along La Palma· Avenue, west to Milleri Street, wherie it turns north to Crowther Avenue, then west approximately 400·f~et where it terminates. The Carbon Canyon Intereeptor, Reaehes 1 and 2 (eontraets 2-17-1 and 2-17-2) pieks up at this point and traverises the Alta Vista Golf Course to Palm Av~nue, triavels west on Palm Avenue to Kraemer Boulevard where it eonneets to the Kraemer Boulevarid Interi- eeptor. Contracts 2-18, 2-17-1 and 2-17-2 are under eonstruetion; see·eonstruetion progriess reporits. ·The Kraemer Boulevard Interieeptor portion of the i~terieeptor-rielief system is designed to handle flo1.Js up to 25 miUion gallons per day and will" serve the prioposed Zand use development in the triibutary area to the year 2010. Excavation has begun on Kraemer Avenue. No pipe has been installed. contractor estimates pipe laying will begin about June 1st. Traffic will be diverted to one lane each, north and south on the east .side of Kraemer Boulevard between Palm Drive and Bastanchury Road for approximately two months. The CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT MAY,. 1975 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 108"4"4 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 CARBON CANYON-PALM DRIVE INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH 1 CONTRACT NO, 2-17-1 CONTRACTOR: BEBEK COMPANY CONTRACT PRICE: $733,147.00 STARTING DATE: DEC. 1974 COMPLETION DATE: JUNE 1975 Contract is for installation of 39" diameter vitrified clay pipe (V.C.P.) from Crowther Avenue, 400· feet from its intersection with Miller Street in Anaheim north through generally undeveloped Zand containing low brush coverage, oil fields and orchards to Alta Vista Avenue.. The line then goes under Alta Vista Avenue and traverses the Alta Vista Golf Course to Palm Drive in Placentia, at the intersection of Warren Street. The job length is approximately 1.2 miles. Contract 2-17-1 is part of the Santa Ana River,· Carbo~ Canyon Interceptor-relief system, designed, in part, to divert flows from the north portion of District 2, relieving the presently congested Newhope-Placentia trunk line to h'astewater Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. · The southerly terminus of the inter•ceptor-relief system is at the diversion structu:rie at Plant No. 1. The Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reach 1 (contracts 2-14-1 and 2-14-2) begins at this point, and is completed to the intersection of Grove Street a~d La Palma Avenue in Anaheim. This ·section was completed during the period from November 1972 to January 1975. From that point, contract 2-18 is under construction west on La Palma Avenue to Miller Street, where it turns north to Crowther Avenue, then west 400 feet where it joins this project. On its northern terminus, this contract joins Contract 2-17-2, the Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor, Reach 2 which travels west on Palm Drive to Y..raemer Boulevard whe~e it joins Contract 2-16-1, the Kraemer Boulevard Interceptor Sewer. This interceptor line goes north on Kraemer Boulevard to Imperial Highway in Brea. Contracts 2-18, 2-17-2 and 2~16-1 are under construction. (See progress reports.) This portion of the interceptor-relief system is designed to handle flows up to 37. 5 mf llion gallons per day, and will in. part serve proposed Zand use development in the northern District 2 tributary area to the year 2010. Pipe installation from Alta Vista Avenue to Palm Drive has been completed apd backfilled. Clean-up is in progress on the Alta Vista Golf Course, and the contractor has made arrangements with the course management to replant turf where necessary. Excavation and shoring operations are underway for a tunnel under the Santa Fe Railway tracks north of Crowther Avenue at the southerly terminus of the ~ontract. Tunneling -and pipe installation into the tunnel is anticipated to oe completed in about three weeks. Pipe laying is in progress _from Alta Vista Avenue south. > c 4 c c • • c • 0 ~ _.., -~1 . NM'l ,~~Q3'J w ... 4 ... 0 0 .. Ir -· '"' u . ~ ~3~VH H!>no~oexo~ ••••••••• ( p,ROA:JS'EO PAl.M ORIV£. INTEl<CEPTO/Z / .• IJ ,,,,., ,., . (-J.r \.• ~ f I It ·. · ':,r' :·.-·, I '1 • flft",.·· .,.. .., ~ r fi: '.Y('' :° -·. _f..Jn I~;-: , ' .J ac.F.c.a ~lw ··r-• · / I 1 ,'._,'/'I:.(' II ii rrt:. t.~,(' -.. ~'/ _., .! f -, / ,-., .J ( CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT MAY'· 1975 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71.C) 540-2910 (71.C) 962-2411 CARBON CANYON INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH 2 CONTRACT NO, 2-17-2 CONTRACTOR: MARK DAKOVICH~ INCORPORATED CONTRACT PRICE: $539,462.00 STARTING DATE: DEC. 1974 COMPLETION DATE: JUNE 1975 Contract is for the installation of 39" Vitrified CZay Pipe (V. C. P.) from the intersection of Palm Drive and Warren Street in Placentia, west on Palm Drive to Kr.aemer Boulevard, a distance of approxim~tely one mile. Contract 2-17-2 is pa:rit of the Santa Ana River , Carbon Canyon Interceptor-relief system, designed, in part, to divert flows from the north portion of District 2, relieving the ·presently congested Newhope-Placentia trunk line to Wastewater Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. The southerly terminus of the interceptor-relief system is at the diversion structure at Plant No. 1. · The Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reach 1 (contracts 2-14-1 and 2-14-2) begins at this point, and is completed to the intersection of Grove Street and La Palma Avenue in Anaheim~ This section was constructed dur-ing the period from Noven'iber 1972 to Januar-y 1975. From tha.t point, Contract 2-18 is under construction west on La Palma Avenue to Miller Street, where it turns north to Crowther Avenue, then west 400 feet where it joins Contract 2-17-1. Contract 2-17-1, Reach 1 of the Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer, turns north at this point, crosses a section of generally undeveloped Zand containing low brush, oil fields and orchards to Aita Vista. Avenue, then continues north across the Alta i'ista Golf Coia:ise to Palm Avenue and Warren Street where it joins on to this project. On its northern terminus, this contract connects to Contract 2-16-1, the Kraemer Boulevard Interceptor Sewer, which travels north on Kraemer Boulevard to Imperial Highway in B11 ea. Contracts 2-18, 2-17-1 and 2-16-·1 are under construction. (See progress 21 eports.) .This portion of the interceptor-rel.ief system is des1:gned to handle flou.'s up to. 37. 5 mi Zlion gallons per day, and UJiZZ in part serve proposed Zand use development in the northe11 n ·District tributary area to the year 2010. Pipe installation is to within 600 feet of completion, to a point just west of Angelina Drive. Backfill and compaction have been completed to a short distance behind the pipe heading. First-course paving has been installed to within 20 feet of the intersection of Angelina Drive and Palm Drive. Final paving will be installed after allowing the ground to settle. Palm Drive, between Angelina Drive and Yorba Linda Boulevard, a section ~p~oximately 150 feet long, has been clbsed to traffic and vehicles rerouted ~outh on Angelina Drive. This condi.tion is expected to exist for about three weeks, allowing the contractor greater access to the job site while traversing the traffic islands at the intersec.tion of. Palm Drive and Yorba Linda Boulevard .. Clean-up is progressing on the completed portion of the contract. ---.. ·-·--·--·--~----··--··-·---"·---------....... -.. - , / ·, / I . /:-/ .. ·; AV· ... ••••• I ' I -I ,,,.. ;_. Io be .... or:: ,,,, J ,_ · ·. · -1 J . '/ /' ,.._~// . ·'I I Ir !" ·.• ,:, 7 pipe. I , ; .. / I . ·:i . [t .; . I II '7 4 ·:; ·· . -''~:Vi 4.~:·,z ( ( CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT MAY, 1975 CARBON CANYON INTERCEPTOR SEWER CONTRACT NO. 2-18 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 CONTRACTOR: S. S. ZARUBICA STARTING DATE: JUNE 1974 CONTRACT PRICE: $1,472,160.42 COMPLETION DATE: JUNE 1975 Contract is for installation of reinforced concrete pipe (R.C.P.) from 66" diameter at the beginning of the project to 39" at.its completion. The contract begins at the intersection of Grove Street and La Palma Avenue in Anaheim, travels along La Palma Avenue west to Miller Street where it turns north to Crowther Avenue, then west to a point 400'feet from the intersection where it terminates, .a distance of approximately 1.4 miles. Contract 2-18 is part of the Santa Ana River, Carbon Canyon Interceptor-relief system, designed, in part, to divert flows from the north portion of District 2, relieving the presently congested Newhope-Placentia trunk line to Wastewater·Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. The southerly terminus of the interceptor-relief system is at the diversion structure at Plant No. 1. The Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reach 1 (contracts 2-14-1 and 2-14-2) begins at thi·s point, and is completed to the beginning point of this project. This section was constructed during the period from November 1972 to· JanuariJ 1975. The.· Cca>bon Canyon Interceptor u.,izl connect into the Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive InteNJeptor, Reaches 1 and 2 (contracts 2-17-1 and 2-17-2) and the KPaemer Boulevard Inte11ceptor Sewer (contract 2-16-1) to 'the north. These three projects are now under construction. (See progress reports.) · Thi~ portion of the interceptor-relief system is designed to handle flows up to 42 mil Zion ga lions per day and wi U in part serve proposed Zand use deve Zopmen t in the northern District 2 tributary ca>ea to the yeca> 2010. Pipe laying has been completed. All paving has been completed. Traffic striping h~s been installed and vehicular travel restored to normal. The contractor is completing installation of plastic liner plate in all pipe and manholes and cleaning sand from the pipe on La Palma Avenue that infiltrated when a water line broke during a rainstorm. Construction of a manhole designed for hook-in of the Atwood sub-trunk at Miller Street and Miraloma Avenue has b~en completed. The sub-trunk will be connected when the project is completed. The final" manhole structure at the end of the project is completed and ready to connect to contract 2-17-1. The contractor estimates completion of all work by the end of Jun~, 1975. COMPLETE ••••• I. TO BE CONSTRUCTED ( CARBON CANYON INTERCEPTOR SEWER LA PALMA AVEtJUE TO CROl..JTHER AVENUE CONTqACT NO. 2-13 1.3 ~ILES OF 66 11 & 39" PtPE CONTRACT AWARDED JUNE 27, 1974 COST: $1,472,160 SC~fDULED fOR COMPLETION FEBRUARY, 1975 ( CONSTRUCTION'PROGRESS REPORT MAY, 1975 KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACH 4 CONTRACT NO. 3-18 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71'4) 5'40-2910 (71'4) 962-2411 CONTRACTOR: A. G. TUTOR CO., INC. AND N. M. SALIBA CO., A JOINT VENTURE STARTING DATE: SEPT. 1973 CONTRACT PRICE: $4,334,412.00 COMPLETION DATE: AUG. 1975 Contraat is for instaUation of approximately 2. 7 miles of 96" Reinforced Concitete Pipe {R. C.P. J from the intersection of Newland Street and Bolsa Avenue in County territory, west on Bolsa Avenue. to Hoover Street in Westminster, north on Hoover Street to Main Street where it turns west to Golden:west Street, then north to Westminster Avenue. From this interseation, the contract continues west on Westminster Avenue with the installation of approximately . 5 mile of 63" R. C.P. to EdJ.j)ards Street.· An 'additional 200 feet of 63" R.C.P. reaches from the interseation of Golden:west Street and Westminster Avenue north on Goldenwest Street. to where it joins with Contract 3-20~1. A siphon structure is to be constriucted at Westminster Avenue and Edwards St~eet to connect this project into the Westminster Avenue Interceptor Sewer (contract 3-14). This project is a portion of the Knott Interceptor relief system designed to intercept flows ·from the northwest and west portions of District 3, relieving the presently aongested MiZler-HoZder Trunk Line to Wastel.Jater Treatment Plant No. 2.in Huntington Beach. The BoutherZy terminus of the system is at the intersection of Brookhurst Street and. Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley. It.will eventually extend to Imperial.Avenue in La Habra. Contract 3-17 started at the south end in July 1972 and extended to Newland Street and Bolsa Avenue in County territory where it joined this contract. This section was comp?~eted in March 19 74. · The Westminster Avenue Interceptor Sewer which connects. to this system at Westminster Avenue and Edzvards Street was completed in JanuarnJ 1971. Flows from the west portion 9f Dis~rict 3 through this facility are now triibutary to the MiZZer-Holde1,, Trunk Line. This portion of the Interceptor relief system is designed to handle flows of up to 105 . mil Zion gallons per day and wi ZZ serve proposed Zand use development of the tributary area to the year 2010. All pipe has been installed. The major pipeline junction structure at Golden- west Street and Westminater Avenue is completed and finishing operations are in progress. Traffic on Goldenwest Street .south of the intersection is still limited to one lane each way. This is expected to continue until the last ·eek in June. Left turns have been restored at the intersection . ..,,,,,,, . Pipe cleaning and installation of plastic pipe liner is underway and expected to pe completed in approximately three weeks. CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT (CONTINUED) MAY, 1975 KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACH 4 CONTRACT NO. 3-18 PAGE TWO Excavation and shoring are underway at the intersection of Westminster· Avenue and Hoover Street for installation of the siphon structure connecting into the Westminster Avenue Interceptor Sewer. The contractor estimates completion of all work and return of normal traffic flow by the end of June. J -----·- COMt=='l f 1f ~ lo 6r CO N ST teUC.i~D 0 0 0 > Ill § D HA'Z 0 A ~ W\'.""5TM lN S TC"I<: M f MOk:I AI.. COUNiY OF O l<.AN6e- PAl<K 0 'rn l ' L f6~N D ~ KNOTT !Nifl<CC'PiO~ 3 Mt Lf '5 o F «:?)~" ?l f'f CON i t:Z l~CT AWArl..D,f°D ! <D-1-'"7? C0 '5j; $ 4/~'?"l , ""1-Z. $CHfOUL;;'"O !=OR COM F'Le'"i lON: 9 -l· 7~ . CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT MAY, 1975 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 108-44 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71.C) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 IMPERIAL RELIEF INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 22 & 23 CONTRACT NO, 3-19 CONTRACTOR: MIKE PRLICH & SONS STARTING DATE: AUG. 1974 CONTRACT PRICE: $832,372.00 COMPLETION DATE: SEPT. 1975 Contract is for the instailation of a 2. 75 mile Vit1 1 ified Clay Pipe (V. C.P. J interceptor sewer-along Imperial Highway from Beach Boulevard to a point 1300 feet past Palm Street in La Habra. The line consists of 1300 feet of 24", 4800 feet of 21 ", and 8400 feet of 18" pipe .. This project is a portion of the Knott Interceptor relief system designed to intercept flows from the northwest and west portions of District 3, re lieveing the presently congested Miller-Holder Trunk Line to ·Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach. The southerly terminus of the system is at the intersection of Brookhurst Street and Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley. This portion of the system is the final section of the northern end. Until interconnecting links of the system are completed, this section will drain into the MiUer-Holder·Trunk Line upon its completion. .It is designed to handle flows of up to 9.4 million gallons per day and will serve proposed Zand use development of the extreme ~orthern portion of District 3 to the year 2010. Pipe installation is completed. Final work is in progress in manholes to the east of Harbor Boulevard and at the project end. Street pavi~g has been completed and traffic flows returned to normal. Contractor anticipates job completion by the middle of June, 1975. _JI...._ L......._A_l-4_A ___ B_.._RA_-Jl I BLVD ,, '--_ __..)fl.._ -"--J'' --~'l ~ L;;.._A.......,, H.;.;_~~BR_A_...JI I BLY D 11 tJI L· ·--------. :::========= LAN\ SE.RT r COMPLETE 8811108 TO BE CONSTRUCTED ( IMPERIAL RELIEF INTERCEPTOR REA.CHES 22 & 23 CONTRACT NO. 3-1~ ul ..... 2 UJ ":) a. 1.4 MILES OF 24", 21 11 , & 18 11 PIPE CONTRACT AWARDED: OCTOBER 7, 1974 COST: $778,372 SCHEDULED FOR COMPLETION APRIL, 197~ ( CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT MAY, 1975 KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 5 AND 6 CONTRACT NO, 3-20-1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108.U ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-241 I CONTRACTOR: SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY. STARTING DATE: DEC. 1974 CONTRACT PRICE: $4,602,992.00 COMPLETION DATE: OCT. 1975 Contract is· for installation of a 66" reinforced concrete pipe (R. C.P.) trunk line from the intersection of Goldenwest Street and Westminster Avenue in Westminster to 1200 feet south of Katella Avenue on Knott Avenue in Stanton, a distance of approximately 5 miles. Knott Avenue is the n~rthern extension of GoldeY!lVest Street. This project is a portion of the Knott Interceptor relief system designed to reZiev~ the presently congested Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer by inter.cepting flows from the northwest portion of District 3. The southerly terminus of .the system is at the int~rsection of Brookhurst Street and Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley. It will eventually extend to Imperial Avenue in La Habra. Contract 3-17 started at the south end in July 1972 and extended to Neu;land Street and Balsa Avenue in County territoPJJ. Contract 3-17 was completed in March 1974. Contract 3-18 started at this intersection and has been under construction for the last two years extending to the intersection of Golderavest Street and Westminster Avenue. Contract .3-20-1 connects in there and extends to the north. This portion of the relief system is designed to handle a flow of 75 million gallons per day and will serve the proposed developed .land use plan in the tributary area to the year 2010 The maphole structure and connection to the preceding trunk line section (Contract 3-18) at Goldenwest Street and Westminster Avenue has been completed and all obstructions to east-west traffic on Westminster Avenue removed. Pipe installation has been completed to approximately 500 feet north of ·Trask Avenue in Westminster, a total of 3,000 feet. Backfilling of the trench and first-course asphalt paving has been completed to a point north of Fenway Drive, within 1,000 feet of the pipe heading. Final paving will be installed when the ground has been allowed to settle. A second pipe heading was established just north of the Garden Grove Freeway to allow tunneling under the freeway overpass portion for a minimum disruption of traffic.on Goldenwest Street during pipe laying. Steel liner plate is being installed in the tunnel prior to inserting the concrete pipe. The tunnel will be 176 feet long; 150 feet has_ been completed. Pipe laying is proceding from the tunnei heading northward to speed completion ~of the project; 400 ·feet of pipeline has been installed at ·the second heading to just north of ~cacia Drive. CONSTRUCTl.ON PROGRESS REPORT (CONTINUf:O) · HAY, 1975 KNOTT· INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 5 ~ND 6 CONTRACT NO. 3-20-1 PAGE TWO Traffic on Goldenwest Street is lirr.i ted to cne lane, botl: ncrth 21: _: scut !: bound, from Westminster Avenue to Garden Grove I3oulevc..r-d. This ccr:di t~(:ir: is expected to continue for 5 more weeks. ':'raffic on Er:ott f.vent.:1.." !~c1·•,:: of the Garden Grove Freeway \dll be restricted to one lane, boti: nc~ ... ~-!1 a?:,! south, as necessary, as the project proceeds .. ( E.t>WAR GOLDEN ~ < J::. c ~ {P 0 r -t WEST )> ~ (D rl ~ V' -t )> '" r- \/) " ~ C:,mp/~·le ....,... I I .' • e 8 e e 8 8 to be Lon::-r·ruC'."':'· _1 ~--..:S!l!.!:P....:.::R~' N.:=..:G:.::C:.;,.;A~\...;;;.E _____ l l ..... _s_,._. __ I !:I ======; ._ ___ .... (/) ~ ( (J) r < 0 KNOTT -=U:::;__, 1----+-F-----=- ,J<'n o-/-1 / n /.ere t'P lor ReQc he:;~ ? .t '0 r )> > -0 <n 0 z )> < WESTERN . --... -•. .... --- --------------~ (\ .x: }> 'Q ~ > z ~ AV. z .... 0 z va -4 0 ;o > () ~ )> z z f1l r PACIF\C RR 2. 8 n?/ /es 0 ./' ~~ // f'/pe c~ ,;,' ...,.,,...~? c r t1tvCJro'e ': 31 ocl. 1"14 c~~../. $4,~03,ooo -.. . .... I I -: / .. · / . r -~.• r /"':',. rr.'f' 1::fh.'/1: 31 Cb: 75 CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT MAY, 1975 TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, REACH 10 CONTRACT NO, 7-6-6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 ,108-44 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71-4) 540-2910 (71-4) 962-2411 CONTRACTOR: MCGUIRE CONSTRUCTION, INC. CONTRACT PRICE: $575,575.40 STARTING DATE: JAN. 1975 COMPLETION DATE: JULY 1975 Contract is for instaZZation of a 27" diameter Vitrified Clay Pipe (V.C.P.) sewer from the intersection of Red Hill Avenue and Mitohell Avenue in County territory west on . Mitchell Avenue to Newport Avenue, then north to Irvine Boulevard in the City of Tustin, a distance of approximately 1.7 miles. This project is a part of the master-planned Tustin-Orange Trunk Line Relief system. It UJill eventually extend north to Villa Park Road and Santiago Boulevard in Orange, providing drainage for the central and northern portions of District?. Reaches 1· through B, the Sunfl()l;)eri and Red HiU Trunk Lines, werie completed in /.1ay of 1972. This section. will drain thriough those lines to Wastewater Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. This section of the system is designed to handle flows of ·up to 9.64 million gallons per day and will serve prioposed land use development of the tributary area to the year 2010. Pipe laying has been completed on Mitchell Avenue, backfilled and finished paving installed. The project is now continuing north on Newport Avenue. Soil conditions are much better here than on Mitchell Avenue, causing the contractor fewer problems and allowing better progress. ·The project heading is at the Santa Ana Freeway overpass. Traffic at this point is restricted to one lane on the north bound side of the street. This restriction is expected to last until the middle of June. A second heading on Newport Avenue between Holt Avenue and Irvine Boulevard to allow cohstruction of a siphon under the flood control channel at that point has been completed with pipe in place from there to the end of the project, backfilled and the first course of paving installed. " ,,, -.· ,• . -.... :;:,... ~ ,, l'" ~" I ~ ........... 0 '1 § ~ ~ ~ ~ " COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS JOINT OPERATING FUND 1975 -76 FISCAL YEAR .l DIST. 2 $.30. DIST. 3 $.33 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS JOINT OPERATING FUND FISCA~ YEAR 1975-76 INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS SHARE OF EXPENDITURE DOLLAR BASED ON TOTAL GALLONAGE FLOW OF 66,4 BILLION SALARIES, WAGES .& BENEFITS . $·.53 · OPERATIONS $ .4-0 BUDGETED EXPENDITURE DOLLAR TOTAL BUDGET $5,102,326 . DEPARTMENTAL ALLOCATION OF · . EXPENDITURE DOLLAR TOTAL ALLOCATION $5~102,326 .... I '. Sched ule I JOIN T OPERATING FUND BUDGET REVIEW & SUMMARY COMPARISON OF BUDGETED & ACTUAL EXPENDITUR ES & ES T IMATED CARRY-OVER Budget Recommended Increase Expenditures Estimated Increase Est'd Carry-Over 1974175 Budget or 1973/74 Expenditures or to Fisca l * 1975/76 (Decrease) 1974/75 (Decrease) Year 1975/76 Sala r ies, Wages & Benefits $3, 190,635 $3,814,826 $624,191 $2,382,458 $2,857 ,935 $475,477 $ 332,700 LESS Chargebacks to CORF & Dists. 1,000,000 l, 100,000 100,000 912,156 939,873 27,717 60, 12 7 Net Salaries, Wages & Benefits Ch argeab le to JO $2 ,190,635 $2,714,826 $524,191 $1,470,302 $1 ,918,062 $4 47 ,760 $ 272,57 3 Mate r ials, Supplies & Outside Services 704, 100 8 11 ,000 106,900 412 ,224 579,304 167,080 124,796 Odo r Control & Che~ical Coag ulants 373,000 507,000 134,000 · 50,338 166,563 116,225 206,437 Research & Monitoring 150, 150 154,500 4,350 108,038 120,256 12,218 29 ,894 Insu r ance (Net) 38, 150 45,000 6,850 25,049 38,009 12,960 141 Utilities 647,000 870,000 223,000 360,336 499,750 139,414 147,25 0 Tota l Joint Operating Expenses $4, 103,035 $5,102,326 $999,291 $2,426,287 $3,321,944 $895,657 $ 781,091 Revenue and Offsets 225,000 250,000 25,000 224,794 232,493 7,699 (7,493) Net Joint Operating $3,878,035 $4,852,326 $974,291 $2,20 1,493 $3,089,451 $887,958 $ 788,584 Transfer to CORF 270,600 230,000 (40,600) 4 1 ,000 41,000 229 ,600 TOTAL $4, 148,635 $5,082,326 $933,691 $2 ,20 1,493 $3 ! 130,451 $928,958 $1!018,184 *Adjusted for authorized budget tran sfers Distr ict No. 2 · 3 5 6 7 11 TO TALS 197 4/75 Flows · (Pa st Year) 7,250 MG 18,755 20,013 3,605 3. 705 4, 16 1 4,417 61,906 MG GAL LONAGE FLOWS Estimated Increase 471 MG 1, 155 1, 741 288 253 .291 327 4,526 .MG BUDGE T RECOM ME.NDAT IONS JO INT OPERAT I NG FUND Fiscal Year 1975/76 ALLOCATION OF JOIN T OPERATING EXPENDI TURES AND TAX LEVY FUNDING Estima ted .Estimated Amo unt to 1975/76 Dis tr ict Es t i ma t ed be Raise d Fl ows Contribution Carryover by Taxes 7, 72.1 MG $ 590,566 $ 122. 507 $ 468,059 19,9 10 1,523,173 301,360 I ,22 1 ,813 21. 754 1,664,462 321, 189 1,343,273 3,893 297,824 53,0 12 24 4,8 12 3,958 302,907 60,881 242 ,026 . 4,452 340,516 78, 156 262,360 4,744 362,878 8 1,079 28 1,799 66,43 2 MG $5,082,326 $1,018, 184 $4,064 , 142 SCH EDUL E I I 19 74 /75 COM PARI SON District Amou nt Ra I sed Contrlbut Ion by Tax es $ 489,083 $ 415,329 1,249,887 1,059,598 1 ,333,2~4 I, 134 ,984 235,204 200,393 248,395 210,935 288,522 . 245,8 19 304,280 259,248 $4, 148,635 $3,526 ,306 JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1975-76 FISCAL YEAR DISTRICT & FUND: Joint Operating DEPARTMENT: CLASSIFICATION: Summary DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE SALARIES, WAGES & BENEFITS Salaries & Wages Employee Benefits: Re t'iremen t (PERS) Workm e n's Comp e nsa tion Gro up Medical In s urance Uni form Rental TOTAL ·PAYROLL LESS ~ Ch a rgebacks to: Joint Works Capital Outlay Individua l Districts · Total Cha rgebacks NET JO PAYROLL APPROVED BUDGET * 1974-75 2,711,521 277,959 62,021 111, l 57 27,977 3, 190,635 400 ,000 600,000 1,000,000 2, 190,635 ACTUAL EXPtNDITURES 1974-75 (4th qtr estd) 2,446,039 239,693 49,854 97.953 24,396 2,857.935 375,537 564,336 939 ,873 1,918,062 RECOMMENDE D BUDGET 1975-76 3;205,665 DATE: SCHEDULE: PAGE NO, May 22, 1975 111 1 of 4 REMARKS Schedule "A" of Personne l Recommendations summarizes projected g ross salaries and ·wages assumi ng full employment of recom- mended positions. Current two-year contract with employees exp ires in November , 1975. No allowance has been made for general salary or fringe bene- fit adjustments . In the event changes are authorized and any accumulated payroll savings are inadequate to fund the adjust- ments, it will be neces sary to al locate funds from the unappropri a ted reserve accounts of the individual Di stricts. 327,610 F ixed by contract, PERS has advised that they expect the employees' rate to increase 1% per year for the next three years be ginning 76-77. 70,676 Recent l egis lati ve changes have r es ulted in a premium inc rea se of approximately 6.5%. 178,396 HMO plan p r em ium increased substantia lfy this year a nd pursuant to the two-y ea r agreement with the emp l oyees , the a dded cost was borne by the Di s tricts. .32' 479 3,814,826 450,000 Charged back to CORF through cost accounting sys t em for work o n t reatme nt plants' capital expansion. 6SO,OOO Charged back to indi v idu a l Di stricts through cost accounting system for work o n Districts ' coll ec tion facilities capital expans ion , and maintenance and repair of sa id system. Al so reflec t s industrial waste division charges to respec tive Di st ricts. 1,100,000 2,714,826 . Rep resents bal ance of payroll expenses chargeabl e to operation and maintenance of joint treatment and disposal works; and administrative and research ac tivities. . JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS DISTRICT & FUND: Joint Operating DEPARTMENT: CLASSIFICATION: Summary DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE MATERIALS, SUPPLIES & SERVICES Gasoline, Oil & Fuel Insurance : I ~ Office Exp~nse Operating Supplies: Chlorine & Odor Control Ch em icals Chemical Coagulants 1975-76 FISCAL YEAR APPROVED BUDGET * 1974-75 54,000 38,150 . 25,000 115,000 258,000 ACTUAL EXPENDITURES 1974-75 (4th qtr estd) 39,266 38,009 15,670 111 ,853 54,710 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1975-76 60,000 DATE: SCHEDULE: PAGE NO, May 22, 1975 111 2 of 4 REMARKS For both fi xed and mobile equipment. Gross expense indicated with motor pool chargebacks r e flected under r evenue. Price of petroleum products has increased more than 50% and has stabilized somewhat. Budget allocation refl ects increased requirements for diesel-driven equipment being used for solids handling, and powe r generation during scheduled shutdowns. 45,000 ·For PL & PO, fire & extended coverage, boiler & machinery, employee fidelity bond and travel coverage. Last year the Boards wer e a dvised of substantia l insurance premium increases because of the Lncreasing number o f claims filed against the Districts, a nd the growing reluctance of insurance companies with respect to und erw riting envi r onment ally- related activities, which is reflected in their rate structures. Th e staff is recommending tha t the Boards consider a study of the Districts' insurance needs and cove rage and has included funds in the Professional Se rvices budget for th is purpose. 25,000 Includes supplies & forms for all depart- ments. 187,000 Budget allocation is p rimarily for odor control at treatment plant sites . Annual budget for this item prior to 1971-72 was $355,000. New Ocean Outfal,1 No. 2 was place d into service in 1971 and ha s essentially eliminated need for ef fluent chlorination . Howeve r, St ate & Fede ral regulatory agencies have proposed oew and conflic t ing regulat ion s which might require r es ump tion of chlorination. In that event it may be necessa ry to allocate funds from the unappropriated reserve of the individual Districts. Chlorine is presently in short su p p ly and this fact was reflected in bid prices received last Dece mbe r which were up 55 %. 320,000 By changing the mode of our operation, we have bee·n able to meet currently-enforced discharge r egulations without chemical additions. Howe ver, NPDES permit re- quirements 'adopted by EPA and the RWQ will require extensive chemical treatment. As reported in the personnel recommen da- tions, we are continuing discussions with the Regional Board in this regard. If unsuccessful, the total allocation will be necessary. JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1975-76 FISCAL YEAR DISTRICT & FUND: Joint Operating DEPARTMENT: CLASSIFICATION: Summary DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE Other Operating Supplies Contractual Services Profes s ional Services ·Printing & Publications Rents & Lea ses -Equipment Repairs & Maintenance Research & Monitoring APPROVED BUDGET * 1974-75 94 ,200 79 ,800 70, 100 25,000 20,000 268,000 150, 150 ACTUAL EXPENDITURES 1974-75 (4th qtr estd) 93,333 43, 121 44,814 23,988 19,491 26 7,570 120,256 •~-~--~ RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1975-76 127 ,000 . 88,000 74,000 30,000 26,000 DATE: SCHEDULE: PAGE NO, May 22, 1975 11 I 3 ·of 4 REMARKS Supp lies required to ope r ate a nd mai ntai n existing and expanding facilities and l a boratory work. Allocation re flect s inflationary trends. Includes grit di sposal, trash disposal, Alternate Fu e l Source St udy with Cou nty and EDP. Includes General Counsel r etai ner & l ega l se rv ices, audit by CPA and odor consultant. Funds al s o provided for insurance study and "revenue program" consu lt ing services requir e d by t he SWRCB & EPA pu r suan t t o 1972 Amendments to the Water Pollution Control Act. Budget increased to r e flect both inc reasi ng prices, primarily due t o paper sho rta ge , and continuing demand by public for info rmati on on Districts' activ it ies. Staff continuing to u tilize for reporting and anal ys i s for maximum e f fectiveness. Rep roduct ion po li c i es have been changed to minimize costs. Fo r heavy eq ui pme nt required in ter- mittently for majo r eq uipment repair. Le ased ve hicl es authorized by Boards have been red uced from five to four. All ocation prov ides for increased rates nego ti a ted by the County of Orange under whose contract our veh i c l es are l eased . 325,000 This item is of~ h i gh l y cont i ngent nature and must allow f or unexpected major equipment failures and maintenance of 154,500 new facilities that are con tinuall y being pl aced in to service as pl a nt constructi on projects are completed. Unprecedented in creases i n t he cos t of parts & suppl ies , as mu ch as 120%, coupled with several planne d repairs t o major equipme nt, in c reas e the recommended budget a ll oca - tion for this item. Include s District s ' cont ribution to So. Calif. Coa sta l Res ea rch Project being conducted under joint powers agr ee- ment. Marine ecology study required by State in connection with ope rati on of new outfall also included. Aga i n, as <eported und e r t he personne l recommendations, the RWQCB has placed requ irements in ou r NPDES permit which apparently extend beyond the intent o f the 1972 Act. If our efforts with the Regi o nal Boa rd are un success ful and monitoring r equ ireme nts are not r ed uced It may be necessa ry to trans f e r as much as $150 ,000 from the Unappropriated Reserve Accounts of the individua l Districts . ' . JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1975-76 FISCAL YEAR DISTRICT & FUND: Joint Operating DEPARTMENT : CLAS SIFIC AT I ON: Sunmary DESCRIPTI ON OR ACCOUNT TITLE ·rravel, Meeting & Training Uncollectable Accounts Utilities ;, Other Expenses Expens es Appl icable to Prior Years TOT AL MATER IALS, SUPPL I ES & SERV I CES TOTAL JO REQUIREM ENTS LE SS: Revenue s NET JO REQUIREMENTS Transfer to CORF . GRAND TOTAL APPROVED BUDGET * 1974-75 17 ,000 647,000 11,000 40,000 1,912,400 4, 103,035 225,000 3,878,035 270,600 4,148,635 '* Adjus ted to reflect author i zed budg e t tra ns f e rs ACTUAL EXPEND ITURES 1974 -75 (4th qtr estd) 12,611 499 ,750 10,609 8,831 1,403,882 3, 321 ,944 232,493 3,089,451 41,000 3.. 130,45 1 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1975-76 17,000 1,000 870,000 16,000 22,000 2, 3.87, 500 5,102,326 250,000 4,852,326 230,000 5,082,326 DATE: SCHEDULE: PAGE NO, May 22, 19 75 111 4 of 4 REMARKS Major items are authorized by specific Board actions. Expandi ng act i vities of regulatory agen cies r equ i re increased Board member and staff trave l. Districts also cont i nue to emphasize ongoing train - ing of employees as operation of facilities becomes more technical and complex. Major item is purchased e lectrical power . We have experienced a 127% increase i n un i t costs during the past two years. SCE has advised that we may expect an additional 20% increase in the average unit cost du r i ng the ne xt yea r, Cou pled with increas ing demand from fu l l -s cale ope ra tion of s ludge dewater ing eq u ipment, and pl acing of add i tiona l new equipment on the line, a l so serve to significantly in crease energy de mand . Also, the 1000 HP e l ectr i c booster pu mps ha ve to be "on-l i ne" more hours to meet peaking req uirements until addit i onal gas -dri ven pu~p ins t allations are comp l eted in 1976-77. Maj o r i tem is f re ight i n and out and reflects expected rise i n r ates due to petroleum costs . Acco unt r equ ired by Un i form Account i ng System. Sa l es of mi scel l aneous sewage tr eatment process. by-pro du c t s , jo int 1·1o r k s treat- ment industrial surcharges, equipment & sampling chargebacks to i ndividua l Districts and mi scellaneous items . Provides for payment to Cap i tal Outlay Revolving Fu nd for spa re parts acqu i r ed under Contrac t Pl-16 a t considerab l e sav ings over what they cou l d be purchased f o r separate l y . Parts wi ll be p l aced in warehouse invento r y fo r future r epai r s and rep l acements. COUNTY SANITATION . DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND · JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION 19 7 5 -76 . FISCA.L YEAR DIST. 2 $.30 DIST. 3 $ .33 . ~ISTRfCTS .S.HARE OF · JO INT WORKS CAPITAL OUTLAY DOLU\R BASED ON EQUITY PERCENTAGE 17 16 1.5 14 13 ti) a: < ...:l 12 ...:l 0 0 11 i:.i. 0 ti) 10 :z: 0 H 9 ...:l ...:l H 8 ~ z H 7 !- ~ ~ 6 ::i ~ ~~s # ~'\.{9 {$-cs. c.,t:t-s~ f..v,,'V ~"\;)'-><(, 'O ...:l s < AMOUNT RAISED BY TAXES s 4l---+----+...----1;--!-r-t-~--L 3 2 1 65 66 66 67 67 68 68 69 69 70 70 71 71 IT CASH BUDGET REQUIREME~TS & EXPENtiITURES AND TAXES RAISED FEDERAL & STATE CONSTRUCTION GRANTS $.53 CARRY-OVER & RESERVES . $ .36 SOURCE OF BUDGETED REVENUE DOLU\R 72 73 / 73 74 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ) I 74 75 75 76 $26.0 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SUMMARY OF DISTRICTS' REQUIREMENTS AND COMPARATIVE DATA FOR JOINT WORKS EXPANSION Fisca l YP.ar 1974-75 1975-76 Requirements Equity Net Cash Estimated Fed eral State mounts To Be Distr ict Perc ent Re uirements Carr -O ver Partlcl at ion Rai sed b Taxes 9, 51 $ 2,475, 738 $ 897 ,934 $ 21,873 $ 1,318,18 1 $ 237,750 2 29.83 7,765,644 2,816,550 68,609 4,134,735 745,750 3 J2.88 8,559,650 3,104,530 75,624 4,557,496 822,000 5 6.62 1,723.385 625,060 15,226 917,599 165,500 6 5,87 1,528, 137 554,245 13,501 813,641 146,750 7 8.22 2, 139,913 776, 132 18,906 1,139,375 205,500 .11 7,07 1,840,533 667,549 16,26 1 979,973 176 ,750 TOTALS 100 .0 $26,033,000 $9,442,000 $230,000 $13,861,000 $2,500,000 -- Schedule A Page 1 5/.22/75 1974-75 Comparative Amount Net Cash Amount Raised Requirements By Ta xes $ 3,205,419 $ 232,828 I0,067,4 90 732,232 10,973,296 811 ,519 2, 145,859 181 ,268 1 ,962,024 142, 135 2,690,680 225,480 2,379,832 174,538A $33,424 ,600 $2,500,000 CAPIJAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUNO SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS 1975-76 FISCAL YEAR GRANT FUNDED PROJECTS 1. 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Plant a.t Reclamation Plant No. 1 Less: Deferred 1976-77 Budget Allocation 2. Reliability Facilities at Pla nt No. 2 Less: Deferred 1976-77 Budget Allocation 3. Facilities Plan & JPL Evaluation (1974-75 Special Project) SUB-TOTAL -GRANT FUNDED PROJECTS NON-GRANT FUNDED PROJECTS New & Rebudgeted Major Projects: 1. Extend Outfall Surge Towe r 2. New Sedim entat ion Basins 0 & P (Mechanisms Only) 3. Brookhurst St. improvements 4. Addiiional centrifuge at Plant No. 2 5. Foul Air Scrubber at Plant No . 2 6 . Gas Mixing for Digesters at Plant No. 2 7~ Addi~ional Pumping Facilities New & Rebudgeted Minor Projects 1. Reclamation Plant No. 2. T~eatment Plant No. 2 3. Equipment Special Projects 1. Solids Treatme nt, Handling & Disposal Less: Deferred 1976-77 Budget Allocation 2. Digester Gas Scr.ubbing 3. Odor Control SUB-TOTAL -NON-GRANT FUNDED . PROJECTS RESERVE FOR FUTURE BUDGET ALLOCATIONS (Job Pl-16) (Job J-6-1) TOT AL JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCT ION REQUIREMrnT S LESS AVAILABLE FUNDING 1 . Estimated carryover and construction reserve from 1974-75 2. Federal & State construction grants 3. Transfer from Joint Operating Fund for spare parts required under Contract Pl-16 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING Net Amount to be Raised by Ta xes for CORF FOR COMPARISON: Taxes Raised 1968-69 1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 1974-75 $4, 180,000 3,800,000 3,800,000 2 ,000,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 500,000 250,000 18,592,000 2,592,000 4,500,000 3,600,000 200,000 200,000 1!)0,000 250 ,000 150,000 150,000 1,250,000 525,000 489,000 396;000 250,000 300,000 250,000 9,442,000 13,861 ,ODO 230,000 16,000 ,000 900,000 3.375,000 2,350,000 1,410,000 800,000 Schedule B Page 2 May 22 , 1975 20,275,000 4,560,000 1, 198,000 26,033,000 23,533,000 2,500,000 CAPITA L OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND NEW & REBUD GET ED MINOR PROJECTS -REC LAMATION PLANT NO. Fisc al Year 1975 -76 1 . Modify Ignition systems -sludge gas engines 2 . Repl a ce bar screen chains -Headworks 3 . Replace and modify grit augers -Headworks 4. Replace District flow reco r ders in Control Center 5. Relocate Moore encoder -Control Center 6 . Construct protective building over plant water and chlorine tanks · 7. Replace digester controller for dlgesters 5, 6, 7 & 8 8 . Expand outside lighting system contro l s 9. Repl &ce flow & dens i ty recorders fo r 3, 4 & 5 basins 10. Expa nd DC power s upp l y 11 . Protective coating for l aunder walls -clarifiers 3 & 4 12 . Laborato r y , Resources Management Center, and lunch room Improvements, and central air co nditi oni ng and modifications to Administration Bu i lding 13 . Natural gas metering 14. Entrance and building id ent ification signs 15 . Digester cleaning equ i pme nt 16. New scum pump for basins 3 & 4 17. Automatic gate ope rators at diversion struc ture 18 . New well at main e ntrance 19. Rehabilitate Ellis Pump Station 20 . Demo liti on of abandoned shop 21. Demolition and abandonment of meter vaults 22. Miscell aneous paving 23. Landsc api ng improveme nts 24. Mi sce llaneous small projec ts $ Sche du le C Pa g e 3 5/22/75 2,000 2,000 4,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 4,000 3 ,500 7,500 2,500 12,500 140,000 3,500 7,000 50,000 12,500 25,000 40,000 25,000 4,000 15,000 . 25,000 25,000 100,000 $525,000 'l - \ CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND Schedule· D Page 4 5/22/75 NEW & REBUDGETED MINOR PROJECTS -TREATMENT .PLANT NO. 2 Fiscal ·Year 1975-76 I. Additional supervisory controls $ 20,000 2. Remodel Incinerator 3,000 3. Remodel air compressor 41 ,000 4. Engine #10 gear box & overhaul -He adworks "C" 11,000 5 . Digester cleaning equipment 50 ,000 6 . Upgrad e effluent chlorination station 10,000 8. Remodel digester "3" cover 5,000 9, Sec ur ity gat e opera tor 5,000 10. Polymer bin hood 3,500 11. Grit augers and hoppers at Phlanz Headworks 35 ,000 12 . Devise circulation pumps for d igeste r feed 16,500 13. "B" clarifier chains 20,000 14. Fresh c:ir ducting at Headworks "C" 15,000 15 . New foul air fans 14,000 16 . ·Remodel ent rance road 15,000 17. Miscellaneous paving 25,000 18.· Landsca pi ng imp r oveme nts 50,000 19. Bowl Head skimmers 50,000 20. Miscellaneou s sma ll pr6jects 100,000 $489,000 .1 . Equipment Total Adm In. Tr ucks & Vehic l es $ 40,280 Other Mobile Equipment 109,273 Machine Equipment & Tools 109,926 Communication Equipme nt 17,4 13 Safety & Traffic Control · Equl pment 1,377 Ins trumenta t I on & Testing Equipment ·64 ,480 Office Equipment & Furniture 39,707 $27,280 Other Equipment 13 ,544 10,744 $396,000 $38,024 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND JO INT WORKS REQUIREMENTS 1975 -76 Fiscal Year Proj . & Col 1. Pit. Mtce. Fae. Mech. $ 40,280 100,793 $7,420 $5,480 77,856 265 530 636 $ 7 ,420 $6,1 16 $219 ,724 Elect. Oper . 8,480 9,842 17,148 953 2,539 $8,480 2,639 $41 ,601 $8,480 Schedule E Pa ge 5 5/22/75 Lab & Res. 424 52,931 3,698 2,800 $59,8 53 Engr . 9,328 5,454 $14,782 1, EPA OEFICIAL REFUSES GRANT REQUEST Newport Bay Agency Receives Setback B Y DALE FETHERLING Times Slaff Writer. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-'s regional administrator turned thumbs down Tuesday on ap- proving a new planning agency for the Newport Bay area, just as the county also was taking the agency to task. In a turbulent day for the newly formed Newport-Irvine Waste Man- agement Planning Agency (NIWA), EPA Regional Administrator Paul DeFalco. in •San Francisco, disap- lends itself especially well to the study and control of nonpoiht sources, which are said to be the cause of worsening proved its'designation as recipient of a federal grant for a two-year pollution study of the bay watershed. The Board of Supervisors, in an apparently unrelated action, accused NIWA of making "an end-run" around the county. The board voted unani- mously to send a telegram to EPA urging that NIWA not be given the grant. In addition, ~he supe~visors sched- uled a report for next Tuesday on whether the county itself shouldn't be I leading the pollution study. The federal and county actions appear to pose serious problems for NIWA, which was formed two months ago in hopes of winning a "208" plan- ning program grant -named for Section 208 of the Federal Water Pollution Con~rol Act. The 208 process is designed to coor- dinate planning by otherwise inde- pendent agencies and also to integrate • water quality planning with that of quality and solid waste. The ~ recommended NIW A's designation -'[mt ~ngt(~ ~i~ * 3 has indicated other funds might be R Wed.,June4, 1975-Pa rtll available from either state or federal water quality in Newpor~ Bay. sources. to send a telegram to Train "strongly Alexander Bowie, tsecretary· of NIWA was formed under the lead-objecting" to any designation for NIWA, said Tuesday that he hopes a ership of the. Irvine Ranch Water NIWA until the six cities in the water- _ meeting can soon be set up among District and now also includes the shed are invited to join and until the NIWA, EPA, and the county to try to Orange County Water District, County county , the county's Flood Control and iron out the differences. Sanitation District No. 5, and Newport Harbors, Beathes and Parks districts DeFalco is believed to have turned ·Beach. join NIWA as separate entities. down NIWA's designation on the b?sis From the beginning, though, there's The county has sought separate that the bay watershed is too small to been some concern about the group's voting rights fo r each of its three qualify for areawide planning funds. membership being mostly sewering agencies. However, his action reportedly is in agencies, rather than the county and NIWA, on the other )land, decided the form of a recommendation to EPA cities which might have to imp lement not ~o tack le the question of voting Administrator Russell. Tr ain, thus any resultant pollution-control plan rights until after the EPA acted and leaving open an avenue· of appeal if Supervisor Ralph Clark protested perhaps set conditions on membership, NIWA can't get DeFalco to reconsider. Tuesday that NIWA had made appli-Bowie said. He also contended NIWA -Io addition, the State Water Re-cation for the EPA grant without the has been actively pursuiDf the~ .!!!p!'t!!!:Oontrol Board -which ha~ __ co_u:;;n;;:ty'::JO:::. =in=in::g:::. =H:--e_w_o_n_boar __ d_a;...p:...pr_o_v_al..,.,....w_a_t..:..er..:..s.:..::.he.::..:d..:..c:,,,it,,.:.ie::,.;s.;.fo;,;r,,;m::;e;;m;,ber,;,,,;;'&::.,==~~ • MEETING DATE June 11, 1975 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1.2 ,3,5,6 ,7 & 11 DISTRICT 1 RIMA •••••• -+ ___ _ ('" .EDR~CH) ••••• BATTIN···· ---; ---- ( J\NS •••••••• GARTHE • • ·• • ------ (SHARP •••••••• SALTARELLI._,; ____ _ DISTRICT 2 QJ:;. L VONS • • • • • •.• CALLAHAN· • • _j__ _v __ _ Ori, TNG •••••••• CHAPUT ••••• ./ .; I ~----DR ICH) .•••• CLARK .••••. _____ _ GARTtiE) ••••••• EVANS.····. _./ ____ _ THOM) ••••••••• KAYWOOD .•.. _1 ____ _ FOX) •••••••••• MAC KA IN. • • __L_ ___ _ PERRY. • • • • • I ISVALSTAD) ••••• SCOTT .•• ••• -/----- PEREZ) •••••••• TEMPLE ••••• .; === === DUNN~) •••••••• WINN •••••• • I WARD) ••••••••• WOOD ••••••• ·-y----- GRAHAM) ••••••• YOUNG...... I === === DISTRICT 3 (HOMRIGHAUSEN). COX········ _./ ___ -- AMO··.····· _L_ __ -- (COLLINS) .••••• BYRNE······_; ____ _ CULVER····. _J ____ _ GRIFFIN).····· DAVIS ·····. _I ____ _ GARTHE). ······EVANS······ _./ ____ _ MAC Ki IN) •• • •• FOX· •••••.. _.1 ____ _ SONJU • • • •• • •• FRANKIEWICH _/ ____ _ NEV I l-· · · · .... GRAHAM· ..•• _1 ____ _ THOM).·······. KAYWOOD •••. _J ____ _ BLACKMAN) ••••• MC KNEW. • • • fv . DIEDRJCH) ••••• SCHMIT..... v === === GIBBS).· •••••• SHIPLEY.... ./ STANTON) •••••• SVALSTAD ••• ~ ---- WOOD) •• •• ••••• WARD ••••••• ---;;----- ARB I SO) ••••••• WEISHAUPT. j === === DISTRICT 5 ~RYCKOFF ). • · • • • MC INN Is. · · DIEDRICH).···· RILEY····· I/ ------_J ____ _ ROGERS • • • · ,/ ------ DISTRICT 6 (MC INNIS) .•••• STORE •••..• _J ____ _ (DIEDRICH) ••••• BATTIN •.... _J ____ _ RIMA ••••... _v ____ _ DISTRICT 7 ,/ EVANS • • • • • • • GARTHE. • · ·• _____ _ f "HONY) • • • • • BURTON • • • • • _.1 ____ _ D'rEDRICH) • · • • CLARK • • • • • _L_ ___ _ MC INNIS)···· ~ · ••. __:!__ ___ _ GLOCKNER · · • ~ ___ _ (TEMPL~) · · • • • · JACKMAN···._/ ____ _ (SHARP)······. SALTARELLI· _I ____ _ D ~fRICT 11 (DIEDRJCH) •••• SCHMIT ••••• _!_ ___ _ (GIBBS) ....... DUKE .. l:n-'.. ./ (WIEDER) ...... GIBBS. UK .. t:/ === === DISTRICT 8 MITCHELL··· (JOHNSON~·· ••• HOLM· • • • • • • === === === (DIEDRICH) •••• RILEY···.·· ------ 5/29/75 JOINT BOARDS AMO · · · · • · · · v v DIEDRIC~) ••••• BATTIN·····=== .1 I ANTHONY •.•••• BURTON····· __ __:!_( COLLI~S •••••• BYRNE······· __ __:!.__v L VONS ••••• • • • CALLAHAN • • • _,,, _ __l_! EWING •••••••• CHAPUT· • • • • • _./ _ __!__i DIEDRICH) ••••• CLARK·······_./ ___ /_1 HOMR I GHAUSEN) ·COX· • • • • • • • • _.; __ .;_J CULVER...... ,/ I J GRIFFIN) ••••• 0 DAVIS· • · • • • • -v ---,;-, MC INN Is) ••••• DeSTA L-0 •••• ----;:;-~./ GIBBS) •••••••• DUKE.······· -v ---.1 -1 GARTHE) ••••••• EVANS· • • • • • • -.; -/ I MAC KiIN) ••••• FOX ••••.•••• -.;-.1 J SONJU •.•••••• FRANKIEWICH . -.1 ---,-J ----; EVANS ....... GARTHE...... v J WIEDER) ••••••• GIBBS ••••••• -./--r" I GLOCKNER •••• ---r;_;-~~ NEVIL)~···· .•. GRAHAM •••••• .1 .1 v TEMP EJ ••••••• JACKMAN..... .1 " v THot-iY ••••••••• KAvwoon ••••• / / ./ FOXJ.. ~ ••••••• MAC KAIN •••• _.1 ___ .1_v RYCOFFJ. ~ ••••• MC INNIS •••• ~ __ - (BLACKMANJ .•••. MC KNEW .•••• _&_ ~ ~ PERRY. • • • • • • ./ .; .; (DIEDRICH).··. ·RILEY· •• •••• J J ./ RIMA •.•••.•• _.; ___ ii_.; ROGERS .•.••• _I ___ .1 _.J SHARP). •..•••• SAL TARE LL I. . _.1 _ ~ DIEDRICH) ••.•• SCHMIT •••••• -"-__ .1_.1 SVALSTAD) ••••• SCOTT ••••••• _J ___ .1_.1 GIBBS) ..•••••• SH I PLEY ••••• _.J ___ .f_v MC INNIS).··· ·STORE······· ,; _.;_. STANTON) •••••• svALSTAD···· ~ ___f!:::_f PER El)· • • • • • • ·TEMPLE· • · • • • _J ___ .I_,; WOOD) ••••••••• WARD· •••.••• _1 ___ ,_ . ./ ARBISo) •••••.. wEISHAUPT··· I .. .I DUNN~) •••••• ··WINN·· •••••• / .1 I WARD) •.•••.••• wooD •••••..• I J ~ GRAHAM)·· • • • •• YOUNG.· • • • • • -;- -/- OTHERS cJqrR~ rJru· Q{r-v-< ~ (\,. ~lfl~'-- ,_I ~",J.0-- HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS CLAR KE v TAYLOR BROWN ~. tll-.v-t/ fl WOODRUFF ~1 1 { t11~L_,: (; EWING 1)1~', / ~n / / HOHENER M cl...-U")~· HOWARD ')' [ -HUNT L1 · (Cc . l --i} KE 1 TH /1,;( 1(/1'>"" .'"" KEN NEY ...+---LYNCH 1f ~i MADDOX {J MART I NSON PIERSALL STEVENS ---- -,/- ~ r~G DATE June 11, 1975 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 DISTRICT l R I MA • • • • • • __JL:_ __ __ ~J'TEDR~CH) ••••• BATTIN • • • • ~ ---- ....-ANS •••••••• GARTHE • • • • ~ ---- SHARP •••••••• SALTARELLI·~ ---- DISTRICT 2 L VONS • • • • • • • ·CALLAHAN· • • ~ ----,. lNG •••••••• CHAPUT •• ···~ ___ _ 11rEDR ICH) ••••• CLARK •• •••• ~ ___ _ GARTliE) •.••••• EVANS.····· _lL_ ___ _ THO~) ••.•••••• KAYWOOD •••• ~ ___ _ FOX) ••••.••••• MAC KAIN.·· v ___ _ PERRY •••• • • v ___ _ !SVALSTAD) ••••• SCOTT ••• ••• ~ ___ _ PEREZ) •••••••• TEMPLE •••• • ~ ___ _ DUNNE) •••••••• WINN. • • • • • • _::L_ WARDJ ••••••••• wooD ••••••• ~ GRAHAM) ••••••• YOUNG •••••• ~ ~ ~ DISTRICT 3 (HOMRIGHAUSEN). COX········ ~ ---- AMO •••••••• ~ ___ _ (COLLINS).·.··· BYRNE.····· ~ __ -- CULVER····· ~ ___ _ GRIFFIN).····· DAVIS······ ~ __ -- GARTHE)· • • • • • • EVANS······ ~ ___ _ MAC ~IN).···· FOX········ ~ ___ _ SONJU • • • ••• • • FRANKIEWICH · ~ ___ _ NEVIl-• ·······GRAHAM·.·.· ~ ___ _ THOM).····.··· KAYWOOD ••• • ~ ___ _ BLACKMAN) •• ••• MC KNEW ••• • ()_., ___ _ DIEDRJCH) ••••• SCHMIT ••••• ~ ___ _ GIBBS) •••••••• SHIPLEY.... V STANTON) •••••• SVALSTAD... OJ ---- WOOD) ••••••••• WARD ••••••• ~ ---- ARB I SO) ••••••• WE I SHAUPT. ~ ~ ~ DISTRICT 5 I. (RYCKOFFJ· ·····MC INNIS··· ~ __ -- (DIEDRICH).···· RILEY • • • • • ~ ___ _ ROGERS • • • • __.lL._ ___ _ DISTRICT 6 (MC INNIS) ••••• STORE •••••• ~ ___ _ (DIEDRICH) ••••• BATTIN ••••• ~ ___ _ RIMA ••••••• _..JL:__ ___ _ DISTRICT 7 EVANS • • • • • • • GARTHE • • • • • V ___ _ f .,..HONY) • • • • • BURTON····· ~ __ -- 0-rtDR ICH) • • • • CLARK • • • • • ~ ---- MC INNIS)···· B88TM... · .. · · v ___ _ GLOCKNER • • • ~ ___ _ (TEMPLE) • • • • • • JACKMAN····~ __ -- (SHARP) • • • • • • • SALTARELLI • V:-___ _ D?e"fRICT 11 (DIEDRJCH) •••• SCHMIT..... V ___ _ (GIBBS) ••.•••• DUKE • • • • • • • V" ___ _ (w I EDER) •.•••• GIBBS • • • • • • i/ ___ _ 5/29/75 JO I NT BOARDS \.;\la.)l_, AMO········~*­DIEDRIC~) ••••• BATTIN ••••• ~ t I ANTHONY •••••• BURTON·····~ COLLI~S •••••• BYRNE·······~ LYONS •••••••• CALLAHAN···~ EWING •••••••• CHAPUT······~~ DIEDRICH) ••• • • C_LARK· • • • • • • IL..-* HOMRIGHAUSEN).COX·········~ 4- CULVER······~+­ GRIFFIN) •••••• DAVIS·······~ ~ MC INNIS) ••••• S88lAL······~-¥-­ GIBBS) •••••••• DUKE········ .,..,.---1;- GARTHE) ••••••• EVANS·······~ -f:-;:- MAC K~IN) ••••• FOX ••••••••• ~ t SONJU •••••••• FRANKIEWICH.~ EVANS ~ ••••••• GARTHE •••••• ~ WIEDERJ ••••••• GIBBS ••••••• ~ _!:I.__ GLOCKNER •••• 0--o_.- NEV IL) j ....... GRAHAM •••••• J£:::._ ~ TEMPl-E ••••••• JACKMAN ••••• v -f--;- THO~) ••••••••• KAYWOOD ••••• ~~ FOX) ••••••••• MAC KAIN •••• ~+.- BLACKMAN} •• :::Mc KNEw.::::~-£- PERRY ••••••• ~ 4--- (DIEDRICH). ····RILEY······· V""'" ~ RIMA •••••••• ~~ ROGERS •••••• ~ -f..:-- SHARP) •••••••• SALTARELLI •• ~-+­ DIEDRICH) ••••• SCHMIT •••••• ~ ~ SVALSTAD) ••••• SCOTT ••••••• L_-¥- GIBBs) •••••••• SHIPLEY····· ~ ~ MC INNis) ••••• sTORE······· ~ ~ STANTON) •••••• svALSTAD···· ~ ~ PEREi) •••••••• TEMPLE······ ~ ~ wooDJ ••••••••• wARD········ ~__if;-­ ARB1so) ••••••• wEISHAUPT··· ~ _i./-- DUNNE)· • • • • • • ·WINN· • • • • • • • -.L-_!f--- WARD) ••••••••• WO.OD· • • • • • • • L.._ +,-- GRAHAM) ••••••• YOUNG·······~ -r-- OTHERS HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS CLARKE TAYLOR BROWN WOODRUFF EWING HOHENER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVENS .. t"~t:T fNG DATE June 11 r 1975 TIME 7:30 p.rn. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5,6,7 & 11 DISTRICT 1 RIMA •••••• ------~1"·tDR~CH) ••••• BATTIN···· ------ biir'ANS •••••••• GARTHE • • • • ------ SHARP •••••••• SALTARELLI. ----__ DISTRICT 2 L VONS • • • • • • • ·CALLAHAN· • • _____ _ ,. lNG •••••••• CHAPUT •••• • _____ _ lJTEDR ICH) ••••• CLARK.· ••• • _____ _ GARTtiEJ ••••••• EVANS.···· • _____ _ THO~) ••••••••• KAYWOOD •••• _____ _ FOX) •••••••••• MAC KAIN.·· _____ _ PERRY •••••• !SVALSTAD) ••••• scOTT •••••• === === === PEREZ) •••••••• TEMPLE ••••• _____ _ DUNNE) •••••••• WINN. • • • • • • WARD) ••••••••• WOOD ••••••• _____ _ GRAHAM) ••••••• YOUNG •••••• _____ _ DISTRICT 3 (HOMRIGHAUSEN). COX········ __ ---- AMO· ••••••• _____ _ (COLL I NS)· • • • • ·BYRNE· • • • • • _____ _ CULVER ••••• _____ _ GRIFFIN)······ DAVIS······ _____ _ GARTHE). • • • • • • EVANS······ _____ _ MAC ~IN).···· FOX······.· _____ _ SONJU • • • • • • • • FRANKIEWICH _____ _ NEVIL-• ·······GRAHAM ••••• _____ _ THOM).·······. KAYWOOD •••• _____ _ BLACKMAN) ••••• MC KNEW •••• _____ _ DIEDRJCH) ••••• SCHMIT ••••• _____ _ GIBBS) •••••••• SHIPLEY •••. _____ _ STANTON) •••••• SVALSTAD ••• wooD} ••••••••• wARD ••••••• ==:= ==:= ==:= ARB ISO) ••••••• WEISHAUPT • DISTRICT 5 ~RYCKOfFJ. ·····MC INNIS··· DIEDRICH). • • • • RI LEY • • • • • ROGERS • • • • DISTRICT 6 (MC INNIS) ..... STORE ...... _____ _ (DIEDRICH) ••••• BATTIN ••••• _____ _ RIMA ••••••• _____ _ DISTRICT 7 EVANS • • • • • • • GARTHE • • • • • ____ -- I -HONY) • • • • • BURTON····· ____ -- JJ,-fDR ICH) • • • • CLARK • • • • • _____ _ MC INNIS) .. •• DOSTAL·· .. • _____ _ GLOCKNER • • • _____ _ (TEMPLE) • • • • • • JACKMAN···· _____ _ (SHARP)······· SALTARELLI· _____ _ D~fRICT 11 (DIEDRJCH) •••• SCHMIT ••••• _____ _ (GIBBS) ••.•••• DUKE ••••••• (w I EDER) •.•••• GIBBS •••••• === === === DISTRICT 8 MITCHELL··· _____ _ (JOHNSoNi • •••• HOLM • • • • • • • _____ _ (DIEDRICH) • ••• RILEY······ _____ _ 5/29/75 JOINT BOARDS \~(fl.)L3) AMO········ 4,-____ DIEDRIC~) ••••• BATTIN ·····_:!/..--___ ANTHONY •••••• BURTON ·····-t-;-____ COLLI~S •••••• BYRNE·······-¥--____ LYONS •••••••• CALLAHAN···~ _____ EWING •••••••• CHAPUT······~ _____ DIEDRICH) ••••• CLARK·······+ __ HOMRIGHAUSEN).cox ••••••••• 4:--- CULVER······ --i./--__ GRIFFIN) •••••• DAVIS·······t-__ MC INN Is) ••••• BOS"f>'<t.· • • • • • + __ GIBBS) ........ DUKE·· • • • • • • +,-__ GARTHE) ••••••• EVANS·······~ MAC K~I N). •••• FOX ......... --4:--- SONJU •••••••• FRANKIEWICH.-¥---=== EVANS ~ ••••••• GARTHE •••••• --T-- WI EDERJ ••••••• GIBBS ••••••• ---¥--__ GLOCKNER. • • • 0...- NEV IL) { .••.••• GRAHAM •.••.. ~=== TEMPL-EJ .••.••• JACKMAN ••.•• t THO~J ••.•••.•• KAYWOOD..... === FOXJ. • .. ..... MAC KA IN .. .. ~... . .... *- BLACKMANJ ••••• MC KNEW. • • • • a_, -- PERRY ••••••• _y__ === (DIEDRICH)····. RILEY·.····· __:j__ __ RIMA •••••••• _'::{__ -- ROGERS •••••• _:t_ -- SHARP) •• ~ ••••• SALTARELLI.. _:t._ -- DIEDRICH ••••• SCHMIT •••••• __::/-.;--- SVALSTAD ••••• SCOTT ••••••• ± -- GIBBS) •••••• • • SH I PLEY • • • • • __ MC INN Is)· • • • ·STORE· • • • • • • _1_ -- STANTON).····· SVALSTAD· • • • ~ __ PEREi) • • • • • • • ·TEMPLE· • • • • • _i_ __ wooDJ ••••••••• wARD········ _:t_ __ ARB I so) ••••••• WE I SHAU PT ••• 4.--- DUNNE}· • • • • • • ·WINN· • • • • • • • __:t_ __ WARDJ ••••••••• wooD •••••••• ~ __ GRAHAM)· • • • • • • YOUNG· • • • • • • _::L._ __ OTHERS HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS CLARKE TAYLOR BROWN WOODRUFF EWING HOHENER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVENS .. ,. DISTRICT NO. 1 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 2 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 3 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 5 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 6 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 7 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 11 Directors present: Directors absent: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING June 11, 1975 -7:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California ROLL CALL Kerm Rima (Chairman), Robert Battin, John Garthe, and Donald Saltarelli None Michael Callahan (Chairman), Dale Chaput, Ralph Clark, Vernon Evans, Miriam Kaywood, Leonard MacKain, Bob Perry, George Scott, Joe Temple, Donald Winn, Frances Wood, and Robin Young None Phillip Cox (Chairman), Lowell Amo, Edward Byrne, Norman Culver, Jesse Davis, Vernon Evans, Donald Fox, Alice Frankiewich, Beth Graham, Miriam Kaywood, Laurence Schmit, Donald Shipley, Bernie Svalstr .. d, Robert Ward, and Martha Weishaupt Thomas McKnew Don Mcinnis (Chairman), J'homas Riley, and Howard Rogers None John Store (Chairman), Robert Battin, and Kerm Rima None John Garthe (Chairman), John Burton, Ralph Clark, Don Mcinnis, James Jackman, and Donald Saltarelli Francis Glockner Laurence Schmit (Chairman), Henry Duke, and Norma Gibbs · None 6/11/75 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary, Ray Lewis, William Clarke, John Thomas, Bruce Taylor, Rita Brown, Hilary Eitzen, Buford McDaniel, Gene Bell, and Ted Francis Director Carolyn Ewing, Director Gilbert Arbiso, Jr., Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Conrad Hohener, Harvey Hunt, Jack Kenney, Donald Martinson, Ed Just, Al Eddows, Jeanne Eddows, Norman Card, and Gordon Cooper · A regular meeting of the Boards ~f Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and. 11 of Orange County, California, was held at 7:30 p.m. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation, the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District's Board. * * * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held May 14, 1975, and the adjourned regular meeting held May 29, 1975, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held May 14, 1975, and the adjourned rcgufor meetb.g held May 29, 1975, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held May 14, 1975, and the adjourned regular meeting held May 29, 1975, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: AEEroval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held May 14, 1975' and the adjourned regular meeting held May 29, 1975, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: AEEroval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held May 14, 1975, and the adjourned regular meeting held May 29, 1975, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: AEEroval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held May 14, 1975, and the adjourned regular meeting held May 29, 1975, be approved as mailed. -2- . .. ., 6/11/75 DISTRICT 11 Approval of minutes Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the minutes of the regular meeting held May 14, 1975, and the adjourned regular meeting held May 29, 1975, be approved as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman Joint Chairman Winn reported that he had received a conununication from Win Adams, Chairman of the State Water Resources Control Board regarding the State's participation in the proposed committee of locally-elected officials representing the TRI-TAC organizations and the County Board of Supervisors Association for the purpose of reviewing proposed regulations involving policy matters affecting local entities. Chairman Winn also advised that he and the General Manager were drafting guidelines and by-laws for the corrJnittee. Directors will be kept apprised of future developments. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager Directors contact him if they had the agenda format or procedures. The General Manager briefly reviewed changes in the agenda format and advised of other changes which would be made in the future. He further requested that other suggestions with regard to improving Mr. Harper reported that the issue of granting the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency discretionary authority with regard to reducing the secondary treatment requirements of the 1972 Amendments to the Water Pollution Control Act was not yet dead, and referred the Boards to a copy of a letter in the Directors' meeting folders addressed to Gordon Wood, a staff member of the House Committee on Public Works and Transportation in this regard. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing new 90-day agreement with Jeanne L~ Eddows re sale of digested sewage solids The General Counsel reported that pursuant to the action of the Boards at their adjourned meeting on May 29th, he and the staff had met with Jeanne Eddo~s, dba Alart Company, and the firm's General Manager, Norman Card, regarding a 30-day agreement incorporating those terms and conditions established by the Boards on May 29th. Alart Company indicated that they could not meet the terms and conditions of a 30-day contract;· and as a result, a new agreement has not been executed. Mr. Woodruff reported that it was the consensus of the staff that perhaps a 90-day contract would be more feasible and allow sufficient time to evaluate the capabilities of Alart Company with regard to processing and removal of sludge from Treatment Plant No. 2. The General Counsel reported that he had drafted an agreement for a 90-day contract incorporating the conditions previously established by the Boards in the event the Directors might wish to consider same. -3- 6/11/75 The new draft agreement has been reviewed ~ith representatives of Alart Company who, up until fifteen minutes prior to the Board meeting, had indicated very little chance of coming to terms. TI1ey have now advised that the draft agreement, subject to a few changes concurred in by the General Counsel, is now acceptable to Jeanne Eddows. 1be General Counsel then reviewed the changes proposed by Alart Company, one of whi~h would be to delete all reference to "dba.Alart Company" and refer only to Jeanne Eddows in the contract documents. Another requested provision was for a clause to award a long-term contract upon successful performance under the 90-day agreement. Mr. Woodruff stated that this was a matter of Board policy and sought direction in that regard. Following a review of the remaining proposed changes, the Boards discussed the feasibility of entering into the proposed 90-day agreement, the ramifications thereof, and the matter of measuring performance capabilities of the contractor. The Boards also discussed the provision in the original contract for a drying operation which had specifically been omitted from the proposed new agreement, pending determination of the contractor's demonstrated ability to perform. It was then moved, seconded, and duly carried: That execution of a new agreement with Jeanne L. Eddows for sale of digested solids, to be for a period of 90 days, be authorized in _a form approved by the General Counsel, with no provision regarding the establishment of a drying system. The terms of a possible long-term agreement should be negotiated by staff and presented to the Boards for consideration prior to the expiration of the 90-day agreement. ALL DISTRICTS Report of Special Committee on Industrial Waste Ordinance, and authorizing staff to conduct informal meetings re modified user charge revenue system Director Duke, Chairman of the Special Committee on Industrial Waste Ordinance, reviewed the written report and recommenda- tion of the Special Committee. The Committee considered six alternatives for the capital recovery provision of the ordinance and discussed the advantages and disadvantages of the various alternatives. Chairman Duke noted that representatives from the industrial community attended the meeting of the Special Committee and participated in their deliberations. The Committee recommends that the modified user charge, Alternate No. 5 in the Committee's report dated June 5, 1975, which continues to utilize ad valorem taxes as the major source of revenue but collects maintenance and operating costs, plus a fixed capital recovery charge, from dischargers ·. exceeding 2-1/2 million gallons per year, as it appears to provide substantial equity among users as well as promote water coriservation. Credits would be allowed for ad valorem taxes paid the Districts. The Committee further recommended that the Boards authorize the Districts' staff to hold informal hearings on the proposed modified user charge revenue system. -4- 6/11/75 The Directors then entered into a lengthy discussion concerning the Committee's report ~nd the alternatives considered therein, following which it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff be authorized to hold informal hearings with representatives of the Chambers of Conunerce and the industrial community for their input and reaction to a modified user charge revenue system, as recommended in the Report of the Special Committee on Industrial Waste Ordinance dated June S, 1975. ALL DISTRICTS Certification of the General Manager received and ordered filed Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the certification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment, be received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Approval of Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund check registers Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Districts' Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund accounts payable check registers be approved for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay: Joint Operating Capital Outlay Revolving $ 266,567.76 1,669,079.25 $1,935,647.01 in accordance with the claims listed on pages "I-1" through "l-5", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of check registers That the District's Operating Fund and Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund accounts payable check registers be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay: Operating Fund Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund $ 4,635.45 324,002.78 $328,638.23 in accordance with the claims listed on page "II", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -5- 6/11/75 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of check register That the District's Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund accounts payable check register be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $623, 190.99, in accordance with the claims listed on Page "II",· attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT S Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of check register That the District's Operating rund accounts payable check register be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $85.00, in accordance with the claims listed on Page "Il-1", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS S & 6 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of Suspense Fund check register That the Districts' Suspense Fund accounts payable check register be approved for signature of the Chairman of District No. 5, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $60.35, in accordance with the claims listed on Page "II-1", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of check registers That the District's Operating Fund and Facilities Revolving Fund acco1mts payable check registers be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay: Operating Fund $ 85.00 Facilities Revolving Fund 150,593.66 $150,678.66 in accordance with the warrants listed on Page "III", attached hereto and made a part of these, minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Resolution determining prevailing wage rates That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-85, ascertaining and determining the prevailing rates of wages to be paid to all workmen employed on public works contracts within the Districts until the amendment or revocation of this resolution; and rescinding Resolution No. 74-80. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -6- .. ~ , . ALL DISTRICTS Approving agreement with County of Orange for in-place density tests 6/11/75 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: 'Ibat the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-86, approving agreement with the County of Orange for 1975-76 in-place density tests to determine relative compaction of sewer trench backfill. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing General Manager to designate members of the Boa~ds and/or staff to attend meetings; and authorizing reimbursement therefor his opinion, will be of value to Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the General Manager be authorized to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend meetings, conferences, facility inspections, and other functions within the State of California, which, in the Districts; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for expenses incurred in connection with said attendance is hereby authorized to be made. ALL DISTRICTS Accepting proposal of Smith-Emery Company for in-process pipe testing for 1975-76 agreement, be received, ordered ALL DISTRICTS Awarding sale of Digested Sewage Sludge, Specification No. S-013 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the proposal from Smith-Emery Company dated June 3, 1975, for in-process pipe testing for the 1975-76 fiscal year, at no price increase over the current year's filed, approved, and accepted. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the bid tabulation and recommendation for Sale of Digested Sewage Sludge, Specification No. S-013, be received and ordered filed, and that the General Manager be authorized to award sale of said sludge to Soil Mix, Inc. at the unit price of $2.10 per cubic yard. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Job Ko. PW-035 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Additional Boiler Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-035, authorizing an addition of $1,474.76 for additional boiler piping, and granting an extension of time of 276 calendar days required to reorder the boiler from another supplier, to the contract with Porter B.oiler Service, Inc., be approved. Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -7- 6/11/75 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Accepting Job No. PW-035 as complete That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-88, accepting Additional Boiler Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job.No. PW-035, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS ~proving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Job ~o. P2-20 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Power Reliability Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-20, granting a time extension of 714 days to the contract with Mel Gorham Electric Company; and adding additional equipment and flooring revisions in the amount of $2,218.39, and deducting for Districts' force account work to complete said job in the amount of $5,348.64, for a net deduction of $2,630.25 from said contract, be approved. Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried: • Accepting Job No. P2-20 as complete That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-89, accepting Power Reliability Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-20, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Awarding contract for Pumps and Drive Units for the Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-lB The General Counsel reported that both bidders submitting proposals for Pumps and Drive Units for Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-lB, had taken exception to the provision in the specifications which imposes a penalty for late delivery. The staff is of the opinion that because the contractor would not receive payments until delivery of the equipment, at which time an 8090 payment would be made with the balance being due upon successful operation of said equipment, sufficient encouragement is provided for delivery in accordance with the specifications. 111e Boards then entered into a discussion concerning the propriety of waiving the penalty clause for late delivery, following which it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-87, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Pumps and Drive Units for the Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Plant No. 2, Huntington Beach California, Job Ko. J-6-lB, to Mccalla Bros. in the amount of $345,000.00; and, -8- 6/11/75 FURTHER MOVED: 1bat waiver of the provision in the specifications for said job regarding penalties for late delivery, be approved. Certified copy of Resolution No. 75-87 is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Verbal report of Executive Committee The Joint Chairman reported briefly on the Executive Committee meetings of ~~ay 29th and June 11th, immediately preceding the Joint Board meetings of those dates, and advised the Boards that the major items of consideration were the agreement with Jeanne L. Eddows, dba Alart Company, and the proposed Joint Works Budget and Personnel Recommendations for fiscal 1975-76. ALL DISTRICTS Approving 1975-76 personnel and joint works budgets The Director of Finance reviewed the 1975-76 joint works budget recommendations, and sununarized the anticipated Districts' budgetary requirements for the fiscal year which will be meeting in August. actions were taken: considered by the respective Boards at their regular joint After a brief discussion by the Boards, the following ALL DISTRICTS Approving 1975-76 personnel requirements; and adopting Positions and Salaries Resolution Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the 1975-76 personnel requirements be approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: Tiiat the Hoards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-96, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 75-17, establishing employee positions, fixing salaries therefor, and authorizing employment of personnel. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried by the following roll call vote: .~proval of Joint Operating Fund Budget for the 1975-76 fiscal year AYES: Directors Amo, Battin, Burton, Byrne, Callahan, Chaput, Clark, Cox, Culver, Davis, Mclnnis, Duke, Evans, Fox, Frankiewich, Garthe, Gibbs, Graham, Jackman, Kaywood, MacKain, Perry, Riley, Rima, Rogers, Saltarelli, Schmit, Scott, Shipley, Store, Temple, Ward, Weishaupt, Winn, Wood, and Young NOES: None ABSENT: Directors Glockner, McKnew, and Svalstad That the Joint Operating Fund Budget of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, for the 1975-76 fiscal year, be adopted in the total amount of $5,082,326. -9- 6/11/75 ALL DISTRICTS Approval of Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget for the 1975-76 fiscal year Moved, seconded, and duly carried by roll ca 11 vote: AYES: Directors Arno, Battin, Burton, Byrne, Callahan, Chaput, Clark, Cox, Culver, Davis, Mcinnis, Duke, Evans, Fox, Frankiewich, Garthe, Gibbs, Graham, Jackman, Kaywood, t-1acKain, Perry, Riley, Rima, Rogers, Saltarelli, Schmit, Scott, Shipley, Store, Temple, Ward, Weishaupt, Winn, Wood, and Young NOES: None ABSENT: Directors Glockner, McKnew, and Svalstad That the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7, and ·11, for the 1975-76 fiscal year, be approved in the total amount of $26,033,000. ALL DISTRICTS Allthorizing drafting of deferred compensation plan reviewed the provisions and The General Counsel reported on the proposed deferred compensation plan for management and supervisory personnel and the purpose therefor. He also briefly administrative procedures regarding such a plan. It was then moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the General Counsel be authorized to prepare necessary documents for implementation c~nd administ:ration of a deferred compensation plan for management and supervisory personnel. ALL DISTRICTS Annual nominations for Chairrr.an of the Joint Administrative Organization This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards at which nominations are to be made for the office of Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Secretary declared nominations open. Director Donald Winn was nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairrean of the Joint Administrative Organization. There being no further nominations, the Secretary declared nominations closed, and reported that the election would be held at the regular July meeting in accordance with the Boards' Rules of Procedures for the Conduct of Business. -10- ALL DISTRICTS Annual nominations for Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization 6/11/75 This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards at which nominations arc to be made for the office of Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Secretary declared nominations open. Director Norma Gibbs was nominated as a candidate for the office of Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. There being no further nominations, the Secretary declared nominations closed, and reported that the election would be held at the regular July meeting in accordance. with the Boards' Rules of Procedure for the Conduct of Business. DISTRICT 1 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:51 p.m., June 25, 1975. DISTRICT 3 Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-21-1 Portion of 27, Contract No. is on file in the off ice of DISTRICT 3 Awarding contract for Westside Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 and Portion of 27, Contract No. 3-21-1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: 11lat Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Westside Relief ·Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26, and 3-21-1, be approved. A copy of the addendum the Secretary of the Distric~s. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-90-3, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Westside Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 and Portion of 27, Contract No. 3-21-1, to A. G. Tutor, Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Co., in the amount of $1,416,448.00. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Approving Change Order No. 12 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-18 an addition of $4,500.92 for A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. and N. Copy of this change order is DISTRICT 3 Receive, file, and deny claim of General Telephone Co_Elpany re Contract No. 3-18, and refer to liability insurance carrier Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 12 to the plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18, authorizing additional rock bedding, to the contract with M. Saliba Co., a Joint Venture, be approved. attac~1ed hereto and made a part of these minutes. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: TI1at the claim submitted by Genera 1 Telephone Company of California, dated June 6, 1975, in the amount of $2,070.57, relative to the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18, be received, ordered filed, and denied, and referred to the District's liability insurance carrier as recommended by the General Counsel. -11- 6/11/75 DISTRICT 3 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:52 p.m., June 11, 1975. DISTRICT 5 Approving Change Order No ._l_ to the plans and specifica- tions for Contract No. 5-14R-6 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: 111at Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Wet Well Repair and Remodeling at 14th Street and 11 A" Street P~~ing Stations, Contract No. 5-14R-6, approving a deduction of $4,960.36 from the contract with Rewes-Schock, JV, due to changes in construction methods, be approved. Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Ordering annexation of territory to the District (Annexation No. 6) Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 75-91-5, ordering annexation of approximately 6.29 acres to the District in the vicinity of the San Joaquin Reservoir (Annexatjon Ko. 6 Harbor View IIills, Sector IV, Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 5). Certified copy of this resolution is ~ttachcd hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT S Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:52 p.m., June 11, 1975. DISTRICT 6 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:52 p.m., June 11, 1975. DISTRICT 11 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:53 p.m., June 11, 1975. DISTRICT 2 Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifica- tions for Contract No. 2-17-1 Moved, seccinded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer, Reach 1, Contract No. 2-17-1, approving a deduction of $4,960.00 from the contract with Bebek Company due to deletion of items 14 and 15 from said contract as requested by Yorba Linda County Water District, be approved. Copy of this Change Order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -12- DISTRICT 2 Receive and file consulting engineer's report re Contract No. 2-16-2 6/11/75 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the report of the consulting engineer dated June 5, 1975, regarding abandonment of portion of Yorba Linda Force Main under Orange Freeway in connection with construction of Yorba Linda Force Main, Contract No. 2-16-2, be received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 2 Receive, file, and accept proposal of Lowry & Associates for design of force main section re Contract No. 2-16-2 of Yorba Linda Force Main, Contract and accepted; and, · Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Tilat the proposal of Lowry & Associates, dated May 23, 1975, for design of new force main section under the Orange Freeway in connection with construction No. 2-16-2, be received, ordered filed, FURTiiER MOVED: Tilat the General Manager be authorized to direct the engineer to proceed with design of said force main section for a lump sum fee of $4,200. DISTRICT 2 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. Tile Chairman then declared the meeting ·so adjourned at 8:53 p.m., June 11, 1975. DISTRICT 7 Ordering annexation of territory to the District (Annexation No. 44) Following a brief report by the Chief Engineer, it was move<l, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 75-92-7, ordering annexation of approximately 1 acre to the District in the vicinity of Cowan Heights Drive and Sirrine Drive (Annexation No. 44 -Ursino Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Authorizing initiation of proceedings re Annexation No. 47 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the .Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 75-93-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 1 acre of territory to the District in the vicinity of Rangeview Drive and Brier Lane (Proposed Annexation No. 47 -Rauch Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Receive and file letter 1rom Eddie Nahigan requesting annexation of territory, and refer to staff be received, ordered filed, Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the letter from Eddie Nahigan requesting annexation of approximately 6.934 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Overhill and Miravista Drive, and referred to staff for study and recommendation. -13- 6/11/75 DISTRICT 7 Approving agreement with Irvine Ranch Water District re Annexation No. 39 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-94-7, approving agreement with Irvine Ranch Water District, in form approved by the General Counsel, to operate and maintain the local sewer collection system within the 176-acre residential area excluded from Annexation No. 39 -Irvine Industrial Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7, pursuant to the conditions established for said annexation. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. • DISTRICT 7 Ordering annexation of territory to the District (Annexation No. 39) Moved, seconded, and d.uly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-95-7, ordering annexation of approximately 316 acres to the District in the area generally bounded by the Santa Ana Freeway, Jamboree Road, Santa Fe Railroad and Myford Road (Annexation No. 39 -Irvine Industrial Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Receive, file, and accept proposal of Boyle Engineering Corporation for engineering services re Contracts Nos. 7-6-8 rmd 7-6-9 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the proposal of Boyle Engineering Corporation dated June 2, 1975, for engineering services in connection with preparation of plans and specifications for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 12, Reach 13 and Portion of Reach 14, Contract No. 7-6-8, and Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 and 16, Contract No. 7-6-9, for a total fee of $59,172.00, less a credit for preliminary engineering study fees in the amount of $5,474.00, for a total net fee of $53,698.00, be received, ordered filed, and accepted; and, FURTIIER MOVED: TI1at the General Manager be authorized to direct the engineers to proceed with said services; and, FURTHER MOVED: That work such as field surveying for plan prepa~ation and construction staking, is hereby authorized to be made at the follo~ing rates: Three-man survey party Two-man survey party Licensed surveyor $60/hour 48/hour 22/hour DISTRICT 7 Receive and file report of Goode & Goode re Contract No. 7-6-7 Pacific Railroad Company in Trunk Sewer, Reach 11 and a received and ordered filed. Moved, sec~nded, and duly carried: That the report of Goode & Goode, dated June S, 1975, re appraisal of right of way to be acquired from the Southern connection with construction of the Tustin-Orange Portion of Reach 12, Contract No. 7-6-7, be -14- . llL DISTRICT 7 Declaring intent to accept Grant of Easement from Southern Pacific Railroad Company offer dated May 29, 1975, for an approved by the General Counsel. DISTRICT 7 Adjournment 6/11/75 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors declare their intent to accept a Grant of Easement from Southern Pacific Railroad Company in accordance with the terms of the District's amount not to exceed $50,000, in form Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:54 p.m., June 11, 1975. -15- of Directors, n Districts Nos. 1, 11 ',.. WARRANT NO. ~049 26050 ·26051 '26052 .26053 26054 26055 26056 26057 26058 26059 26060 26061 26062 26063 26064 26065 26066 26067 26068 26069 ' 26070 , 26071 26072 26073 26074 26075 26076 26077 26078 26079 26080 26081 26082 26083 26084 26085 26086 2-6087 26088 26089 26090 { 2b091 I 26092 26093 26094 ) . 26095 26096 26097 ??1098 ·~J99 20100 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Advance Sales & Service, Truck Parts $ Alex Fish Company, Ecological Research Supplies All Bearing Service, Inc., Seals & Bearings Amac Equipment Co., Switches City of Anaheim, Power Anaheim Sewer Construction, Lateral Repair The Anchor Packing Co., Gaskets & Pump Packing Artesia Implements & Parts Co., Equipment Rental Banning Battery Company, Batteries Beckman Instruments, Metering & Lab Supplies Bell Pipe & Supply Company, Valves & Pipe Supplies Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair Bender Machine, Inc., Compressor Repair Bird Machine, Centrifuge Parts Blair Paving, Inc., Paving Borg-Warner Industrial Drives, Pump Parts Brenner-Fielder & Associates, Inc., Compressor Parts Broadlicks Art Supply, Drafting Supplies Brookhurst Dodge, Truck Parts Bruner & Lay, Tools C & R Reconditioning Company, Compressor Repair CS Company, Valves & Compressor Parts Cal-State Seal Company, Seals Cal 1 s Cameras, Photo Supplies & Processing CASA, Executive Meeting Registration California DiGtributors, Equipment Parts R. T. Campbell Co., Filters John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Service, JPL Plant Castle Controls, Inc., Controls Coast Insurance Agency, Auto Insurance Fremium College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials Conneaut Metallic Packing Co., Pump Packing Consolidated Electric Distbrs., Electric Suplies Consolidated Bolt & Nut Co., Hardware Constructor's Supply Co., Tools Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts County of Orange, Printing Crest Leasing, Vehicle Lea~e Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplies Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage Daily Pilot, Bid Notice S-013 C. R. Thtvis Supply Co., Hose De Guelle & Sons Glass Co., Glass Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling Nick Di Benedetto, Employee Mileage Ida L. Duesberg, Employee Mileage Duncan Hunter Co., Hose Eastman, Inc., Printing & Office Supplies Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring Fischer & Porter Company, Metering Supplies & Pump Parts Flippen Mfg. Co., Equipment Parts City of Fountain Valley, Water I-1 AMOUNT 267.80 53.00 97.20 1,059.26 83.46 150.00 516.31 200.00 253.76 527.51 447.32 19.00 165.78 3,745.61 240.00 107.00 335.47 15.64 14.87 31.09 210.00 927.57 117.93 339.16 15.00 132.16 69.20 17,171.01 259.10 180.00 44.97 22.07 1,546.16 672.22 140.70 531.45 28.80 147. 28 40.00 67.44 9.11 548.61 33.41 100.00 24.90 18.45 203.52 994.49 3,000.00 642.72 34.38 40.00 WARRANT NO. 26101 2bl02 26103 26104 26105 26106 26107 26108 26109 26110 2blll 26112 26113 26114 26115 2bll6 . 2b117 26118 2bll9 26120 26121 26122 2bl23 26124 26125 . 2"6126 26127 26128 26129 2bl30 26131 2bl32 26133 26134 26135 2bl36 26137 26138 26139 26140 26141 26142 26143 26144 26145 26146 26147 2bl48 26149 26150 26151 26152 26153 26154 26155 26156 IN FAVOR OF France Products Division, Compressor Parts Furane Plastic, Inc., Hardware Garden Grove Lumber & Cement Co., Building Materials Garrett Industrial Supply Co., Equipment Cabinets General Electric Supply, Electric Supplies Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine Contract 1-1-75 General Telephone Company of California Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage Goldenwest Fertilizer Co., Grit Removal Graybar Electric Company, Electric Supplies L. C. Gysin, Employee Mileage Fred A. Harper, EPA Meeting Expense Halsted & Hoggan, Inc., Pump Parts Harrington Industrial Plastics, Pipe Supplies Harrisons & Crosfield, JPL Chemicals Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal . Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease Holiday Inn of Somerville, Lodging JPL Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires Honeywell, Inc., Strip Charts Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies & Tools City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Equipment Rental Huntington Labs, Lab Supplies ICN Life Sciences Group, Lab Supplies Industrial Asphalt, Paving Materials Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware Internatj.onal Business Machines, Office Supplies International Harvester Co., Truck Parts Irvine Ranch Water District, Water Jensen Instrument Company, Instrumentation Supplies Jensen Tools & Alloys, Tools Justin PaQific Corp., Centrifuge Parts Kahl Scientific Instrument Corp., Lab Supplies Keenan PiEe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies Kelly Pipe Company, Pipe Supplies Kenron Industrial Supply, Tools King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, V-Belts & Hardware Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware & Tools LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Hardware & Tool Repair L & N Uniforms Supply Co.,·Uniform Service The Lacal Company, Inc., Seals Judy Lee, Employee Mileage Los Angeles Times, Annual Subscription R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., Paving Materials McCoy Ford, Truck Parts McCoy Ford Tractor, Tractor Parts McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Controls & Hose Manning Enviromentals Corp., Test Equipment Ann Martin, Employee Mileage Master Blueprint & Supply, Printing Metal Finishing, Technical Journal Mine Safety Appliances Co., Safety Equipment Missimers·Incorporated, Hardware I-2 $ AMOUNT 669.10 132.09 261.56 186.71 121.18 6,335.20 305.16 6.75 3,159.00 201.31 10.05 24 .45 534.34 98.80 13,088.88 210.00 429.08 101.89 87.09 77.29 1,.121. 09 9.11 80. 76 122.47 65.02 9.22 245.90 152.64 162.36 2.05 655.80 233.70 3,419.56 139.30 392.34 466.02 36lt.71 767.59 3,319.02 4olt .J4 3 209.98 273.00 3,095.81 64.24 17.85 42.00 306.17 130.10 351.98 380.71 28.20 24 .54 107.01 8.oo 90.61 327.36 WARRANT NO. 26157 -158 ~159 26160 ·26161 . 26162 26163 ·26164 I 26165 26166 26167 26168 26169 26170 26171 26172 26173 26174 26175 2bl76 26177 26178 26179 26180 26181 26182 26183 26184 26185 26186 26187 26188 26189 26190 26191 26192 26193 26194 26195 26196 26197 .26198 26199 26200 26201 26202 26203 26204 2b205 . 26206 26207 ?f>208 209 ~210 IN FAVOR OF Montgomery Brothers, Inc., Pump Parts $ Moore Business Forms, Inc., Paper E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers Morrison Company, Pipe Supplies Musick, Peeler & Garrett, Special La.bor Counsel Nalco Chemical Company, Chemicals National Chemsearch, Chemicals National Lumber Supply, Hardware, Tools & Bldg. Mat'ls City of Newp0rt Beach, Water Newporter Inn, Lodging Occidental College, Ecological Trawl Orange County Appliance Parts, Valve Orange County Brake, Truck.Repair Orange County Chemical Co., Blueprint Supplies Orange County Stamp Co., Office Supplies Orange Paper Products, Inc., Hardware Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies Pacific Telephone Company Parks Crane Service, Inc., Crane Rental M. c. Patten Corporation, Pump Parts Perkin-Elmer, Lab Supplies Petroleum Dynamics, Engine Parts Pro-Tech, Inc., Sampling Equipment Porter Boiler Service, Inc., Boiler Parts & Gaskets Postma.ster, Postage Premium Rubber Company, Hose Quaiity Building Supply, Building Materials REA Express, JPL Freight Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal Red Valve Company, Inc., Valve Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts Ruff's Saw Service, Saw Sharpening S & C Electric Company, Electric Supplies Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motor & Motor~Repair Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies Science Applications, Inc., Hazard Waste Study Scientific Products, Lab Supplies City of Seal Beach, Water Seal Methods, Inc., Gasket Material Security Industrial Supply Co., Pipe Supplies & Valve See Optics, Safety Glasses Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies John Sigler, Employee Mileage Signal-Flash Company, Barricade Rental Sims Industrial Supply, Hardware Fred Sinasek, Employee Mileage Snow-Gates & Valves, Steel Gates Southern California Edison Company South Orange Supply, Piping Supplies So. Calif. Coastal Water Research Project Authority, Share of 75-76 Budget (Resolution 75-64) Southern California Gas Company Southern California Water Company Southern Marine Supply, Hose I-3 AMOUNT 76.50 111.94 562.02 819.91 1,701.29 582.84 778.31 224.30 5.00 41.74 400.00 9g.48 259.50 102.40 106.69 127.20 43. 97 461.46 216.00 127.29 276.63 345.92 121. 00 72 .40 750.00 190.16 154.23 725.51 62.00 102.37 349. 45 31.50 2,778.69 50.61 699.10 301.84 1,000.00 22.54 8.80 230.00 2,898.93 53.27 296.97 40.26 26.00 106.00 38 .46 6,360.00 50,885.39 47.90 79,600.00 1,312.15 3.00 65.72 .l WARRANT NO. 26211 26212 26213 26214 26215 26216 26217 26218 26219 26220 26221 26222 26223 26224 26225 .. 26226 26227 26228 26229 26230 26231 26232 26233 26234 2.6235 26236 26237 26238 26239 26240 26241 26242 26243 26244 26245 26246 26247 26248 26249 26250 26251 26264 IN FAVOR OF Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water $ Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Oil Company of Calif., Oil, Gasoline & Diesel Stang Hydronics, Inc., Hardware Sully Miller Contracting Co., Paving Materials Sun Electric Corporation, Electrical Repair J. Wayne Sylvester, Dir. of Finance, Petty Cash Reimb. T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Truck Parts Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage Taylor-Th1nn, Equipment Parts 39 Stake & Building Supplies, Survey Supplies Thomas Bros. Maps, Trunk Maps Trade Paper Company, Mailing Supplies Truck & Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts E. F. Tucker, Specification Supplies United Auto Parts, Truck Parts United Parcel Service, Freight-Out United Reprographics, Inc., Printing U. s. Dept. of Commerce -NTLS, Technical Journal United States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts Utilities Supply Company, Tools Van Waters & Rogers, Odor Control Chemicals Versa-Tech Development Corp., JPL Testing Paul Vukich, Employee Mileage Wagner Hydraulic Equipment Co., Pump Pa.rts Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage John R. Waples, R. s., Odor Consultant Warren and Bailey Co., Inc., Compressor Parts Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts West-Print, Brochure Printing Western Highway Products, Inc., Safety Signs Western Salt Company, Salt Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Supplies Russell Wold, Employee Mileage Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel World Travel Bureau, Inc., Air Fare, Various Mtgs. Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage John M. Wright, Employee Mileage Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Services Donald Winn, Jt. Chairman Meeting Expenses C. Arthur Nissan, Legal Counsel TOTAL JOINT OPERATING I-4 AMOUNT 86.50 358. 3li 3,520.64 ~ 85.86 254.43 80.60 420.96 199.17 43.50 48.67 37.26 2,423.42 89.99 1J47.05 172.30 33.12 36.30 218.47 75.00 1,591.13 75.68 6,237.88 2,409.55 21.00 39.05 34.38 222.90 2e6.20 740.66 58.35 36.65 162.38 868.35 35.22 3,030.50 25.75 5~.38 62. 4.o 2,232.80 1,626.93 222.93 730.00 WARRANT NO. ~037 2b038 '26039 . 26040 26041 '2601~2 ' 26043 26044 26045 26046 26047 26048 26049 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16 Engineers Sales-Service Co., Pumps Forkert Engineering, Survey Pl-16 Foster-Barker, Communication Equipment Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Mgmt. Pl-16 McCoy Ford, Truck A-074 McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Chain Hoist Porter Boiler Service, Inc., Contractor PW-035 Smith Emery Company, Testing Pl-16 Southern Calif. Testing Lab, Testing Pl-16 Tektronix, Inc., Instrumentation Test Equipment Twining Laboratories, Testing Pl-16 Industrial Indemnity Co., Assignee of Mel Gorham, Contractor P2-20 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF I-5 AMOUNT $ 1,587,094.19 7,155.00 300.00 380.50 12' 031. 44 A 6 ,,. 2Q, L 5 • 7b 281.59 1,327.28 936.00 333.72 2,149.40 300.00 35,933.37 $ 1,669,079.25 $ 1,935,647.01 DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 26012 Clifford Forkert, Right-of-way Services 26013 26014 260l5 26016 26017 26018 26019 26020 26021 26022 26023 26024 26025 26026 26027 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Bebek Company, Contractor 2-17-1 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 2-17-2 Mark Dakovich, Inc., Contractor 2-12R & 2-17-2 J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation, Contractor 2-15 Lowry and Associates, Engineering Services, 2 14-4, 2-14-5, 2-15, 2-16-1, 2-17-1, 2-17-2, 2-18 Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 2-16-1, 2-17-1 Southern California Testing Laboratory, Soils Testing 2-15 2-17-2 S. S. Zarubica, Contractor 2-18 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOF OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 3-18, 3-19, 3-20-1 3-20-2, 3-21-2 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-20-1 Mike Prlich & Sons, Contractor 3-19 The Register, Notice 3-21-1 Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 3-20-1, 3-20-2 Sully-Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 3-20-1 A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Saliba, Contractor 3-18 & II 3-20-2 AMOUNT: $ 4,635.45. $ 149,304.60 221.40 125,405.00 16,906.84 24,686.00 494.00 363.94 62621.00 $ 3242002.78 $ 3 2 8 2 6 3 8 . 2 3. $ 25,251.95 116.02 15,206.00 91.75 3,991.00 536,830.20 412704.07 $ 6232190.99 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS ~ARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 26028 State of California, Processing Fee, Annexation 6 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 26036 Daily Pilot, Bid Notice 5-14R-6 II-1 $ $ AMOUNT 85.00 60.35 DISTRICT NO. 7 WARRANT NO. OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 26029 State of California, Processing Fee, Annexation 44 26030 26031 26032 26033 26034 26035 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 7-6-6 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 7-6-6 Goode & Goode Appraisers, Appraisal 7-6-7 McGuire Construction, Inc., Contractor 7-6-6 Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 7-6-6 George W. and Harriet Willis, Easement 7-6-6 III AMOUNT· $ 85.00 $ 1,250.00 210.76 3,7'15.00 145,188.90 104.00 65.00 $ 1502593.66 $ 150,678.66 S(a) Report of the Joint Chairman Winn advised that he received a concerning their intent to work we have proposed. Read letter. Will keep Directors informed as #6(b) Report of the General Manager JUNE 11, 1975 JOINT MrG. letter from Win Adams, Chairman of the SWRCB, with us on the formation of the committee that Said Mr. Harper and he suggested some guidelines. this develops. Mr. Harper first asked the Directors to note some changes in the agenda. All of the bills are together now. Pulled out construction reports which were on agenda before and have compiled them into one single report to be given to Directors each month. Said he has already received some suggestions re getting maps on same side of paper as reports and will be making other improvements. Said we would appreciate any comments that Directors might have at any time. Said it also has been suggested that we get a little better indexing method regarding supporting material. Will make that change. Reported that we have received good news regarding secondary treatment for ocean discharge. Referred to letter to Gordon Wood in Directors' folders. Are going to hold some hearings relative to amendments to compliance dates re Pl 92-500. Are considering changing to July, 1977 date that all publicly-owned treatment works will have to have secondary treatment, and giving Administrator authority to change this on a case-to-case basis primarily because ftmding hasn't been available. They now believe we should have the time to study the situation and looking at each site where discharge is occurring as to what type of treatment should be made. EPA is holding some hearings on the 19th of this month in San Francisco on some suggested changes re secondary treatment and discharges to the ocean. Are looking for ways to cut back on the cost of their program. Needs Survey calls for $300 billion + and would like to spend $25 billion and close the door on the whole thing. #6(c) Report of the General Counsel Mr. Woodruff reported regarding the Alart Company matter discussed at the May 29th meeting relative to the 30-day agreement. Met with Jeanne Eddows and Mr. Card following that meeting and a week ago met with them again and made available to them the minutes and specific action of the Districts. The result of the meetings was that they indicated that they could not meet the terms and conditions on a 30-day contract. Said management staff agreed that it would be pretty difficult to evaluate any performance in the course of 30 days. As a result, there has never been a 30-day contract executed. However, the Manager has recommended that the Board take into consideration a 90-day contract. Woodruff stated he has prepared an agreement that outlined the positions of the Dir~ at the May 29th meeting and removed all of the provisions dealing with the system contemplated in the original 10 year agreement and itemized dates of which the sludge had to be removed. Agreement was presented to representatives of Alart Company last week and at one point there was apparently no chance of agreement on that package. Met again this afternoon and was now advised--15 minutes ago--that the agreement, subject to a few changes that he concurred with, is acceptable to Ms. Eddows. If the Directors decide to grant them a 90-day agreement to enter property and remove sludge, will be for 90 days and it expressly points out by what days the sludge must be removed from certain beds. Is designed to give the staff some gauge as to the progress of the contractors during the course of the 90-day program. A provision has been requested to be inserted that at the end of the 90-day period if the contractor has performed in accordance with the terms of the agreement, the Directors will award a new long-term contract basically in the same scope of the February agreement. Woodruff said he expressed dissatisfaction with the language of that. Indicated that somebody has to be a decision maker as to whether they have performed in accordance with the terms. If this agreement is approved by the Board, would have to include a provision re determination as to whether or not contractor has performed . Should be determined by Board of Directors. Advised that Mr. Clarke met with Ms. Eddows & Mr . Card several times within last 10 day s and have some understanding re proposed schedule if 90-day agreement acceptable to Directors. They are willing to accept the agreement subject to relatively minor changes . Duke asked if staff agreed that it would be better to go to a 90-day contract rather than 30 to evaluate properly. Was answered yes, that is correct. Duke then asked if they could ask Jeanne Eddows whether she would go along with the general contract they just agreed upon. Was advised that Mr. Card just spoke for her before the meeting . Duke wanted to ask her to verbally state that she agreed to it. Byrne then asked Woodruff to elaborate specifically on the few minor changes to cont~act. He answered that they would delete referring to dba Alart Company and refer specifically to Jeanne Eddows. One change that is not minor is clause that upon satisfactory completion of 90-day contract, Board of Directors will award a long-term contract consistent with February 20th agreement. Said he considers that a policy matter and Board should determine that. Would not include or exclude that without authorization of the Board. Another change was on page 3 re material at Plant 2 that we have already planned to put in hopper and transport to Plant 1. That material will be available once it gets to Plant 1. Also add a paragraph that in the event of misunderstanding or dispute, there will be written notice given to the other party--10 days notice. In a 30-day contract, not workable. Under obligations of contractor, changes are to specify that middle bed No. 1. will be completed within 45 days; second bed north of No. 1 by Sept . 15 and others by conclusion of agreement. Also, in the event a long-term contract is not awarded or contract is rescinded prior to 90 days, the contract will have rights to sludge that he has prepared. Said that might be acceptable to Districts provided that they be entitled to anything they can ship after 30 days of rescission . Original agreement erroneously picked up language relative to insurance in the amount of $3,000,000 and was reduced to $1,000,000. Would use reduced figure. We have to rearrange the wording with respect to the Districts obtaining some security from the contractor--paragraph 9. Can take the form of an assignment or might do any number of things and indicate that they wi~l pay us on a weekly basis. Mcinnis then commented that the allegation at first was caused by wet weather. Now with 90-day contract, could weather still be a problem. Who will determine if they are acceptable . FAH said if they can't do it in the next 90 days, will never be able to do it. Mcinnis asked if that proved they can do it next time when it rains. FAH said it wouldn't prove or guarantee that. Winn stated that any long-term agreement would come back to the Boards. Correct? Woodruff answered yes. Burton asked if the original contract was established on a drying operation for 10 years or 15 months or whatever, and what happens when it rains now. FAH said there wasn't any provision for waiver for any problem in original contract. Asked what happened before and answered it was trucked away wet. FAH said there are two areas provided for a drying operation on the ground. One of the things to be done by contractor is to prepare the gro\Illd by a grading operation. Two areas t o work in--one area available for two or three years and the other for life of contract. -2- . " Duke said he wanted to compliment General Cotmsel on comments made and moved the recommendation of the General Counsel. Motion was seconded. Voice vote. Motion carried. Winn stated that he assl.lllled that motion preempted a declaration by Alart Company. Duke answered yes. #6(d) Report of Special Committee on Industrial Waste Ordinance Byrne said that the report on Alternative 5 was certainly an improvement over what they had the last time but were a couple of points he wanted to make . The charge against excess capital and capital recovery is 60% of actual cost. Why do we not plan on charging the flat $204 estimated in 1975? Duke said as far as the Conunittee is concerned, agree we are giving more consideration to business than we really should and that was because EPA was going to come out with a similar plan to what staff wa s proposing . Biggest debate was whether business should be charged retro- active to 1970 or should be charged starting in 1974. Staff came up with longer term proposal starting right now and starting with income base or users fee which involved the amount of water used from now to infinity. Committee said if we took money now rather than be retroactive, in 10 years that money would double. Some of the businessmen interested were at the meeting and they also felt that maybe that wasn't such a bad deal . Probably will be charged more over 20 years but felt this to be the fair and equitable way. Charge everybody. Byrne added that this does not solve one of the principal things that were raised-- the immediate lump sum billing comes to a fantastic amount of money. Why not consider charges amortized over 30 years. FAH stated that actually Mr. Byrne's letter did help point the staff to look in this direction. That is actually what we are looking for--iong-term capital recover to industry. Out of this will come a long-tenn approach that will recover the funding over a long period of time. We are looking at what is occurring in Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts in their charges in the last two yea rs. Have been $230 per million gallons. We are talking about around $200. After we discuss this with industry, may have something different. It will in the long run solve some problems . Winn stated that he believed that any action that they would take tonight would declare an intent to adopt this Committee's proposal and authorize the staff to again conduct public informal hearings. Duke added that staff is recommending $200 per million gallons--70% for flow, 20% for suspended solids and 10% for BOD. This would be authorizing staff to hold informal hearings with Chambers of Commerce and representatives of industry. Think this is the way to go. Equitable to everybody. Grandfathers protected under old ordinance are now going to have to start paying. Committee's recommendation was then moved and seconded. Voice vote . Motion carried. FAH will report further at next meeting . Culver asked how many companies were in that category. John Thomas said he was reluctant to estimate but maybe 2000 that exceed 2 .5 million per year . Winn thanked Henry Duke, Committee and staff. -3- #9 Consent Calendar items removed: /l.,. (f) General Counsel requested this item to be removed. He reported that we took bids and bidder has requested to take exception to provision in our specifi- cations which imposes a penalty clause for late delivery. In view of the complexity of the equipment and our supplier will be havin.g to be served by numerous sub-suppliers which might shut down his production, it is the staff's recommendation that we waive that provision in the agreement. Tii.ey have filed their intent to comply with 300 days but have numerous subcontractors for various portions of agre ement . Item was moved and seconded. Duke said he felt we should have some kind of contract with them regarding completion date. Saltarelli added that if we can't have a penalty claus e, no sense in giving them a delivery date. Should have some time of clause that in the evnet of unreasonable delivery, we would have the ability t o do something. Mcinnis asked how many bids were received and if other bidders were advised of this exception. Were two bidders and other bidder took same exception. FAH then advised that the payment benefit on this is 80 % upon delivery of equipment . We are not paying the contractor until he delivers equipment s o this may have some bearing on Directors' decision. REL added 80% to be p a i d upon delivery and balance upon successful operation of equipment. Said staff feels that is adequate protection for Districts. Voice vote on mo tion. Motion carried. 1 "----Instructed Woodruff to put in protection in agre ement. (q) Asked for location of Sirrine Drive . FAH s a id it is on the b ack s ide o f Cowan Heights east of Crawford Canyon a rea . REL s ho wed area on ma p. Was asked if this was within City of Or an ge' s phere of influence , a nd was a nswered was within City of Tustin. Motion wa s then mad e an d seconde d t o approve this item. Motion carried. #11 Ve rb a l r e port of Exec . Committee Re garding May .. 29th meeting , most of that meeting wa s revie w Alart si t ua t i on. Met again tonight to review items comin g up on a genda. Mr. Lewis & Mr. Sy lves t e r will r eport on them l a ter. #12(a) Report on Joint Works budge t Fantastic r e port by "World Fa mou s " Director of Finan ce !! Salta relli had one question regarding research budget. Was wondering if we wo u l d b e getting a s much out o f what we p a id for SCCWR P as we have been. FAH sai d yes and Duk e sai d he thought this was r eally g ood . Prove s to government an d prov i des industry with th e fact tha t th e re are problems to our sys t em . Tii.ink SCCWR P i s going to continue to be on e o f the mo s t worthwhile proj ect s of the Sanita tion Di s tricts #1 2 (b) De f e rred c ompens a ti on pl an Ge n er a l Coun s el r eported th a t th e Gen e r a l Man age r h as b een cons i de ring this typ e o f program for som e time to h e lp brea k a p a rt man age me n t pers onn e l from n on-m an ageme n t p e r sonne l . On e o f th e p ro gr ams th a t wa s s u gges t e d was a de f e rred compe nsat i on p l an. Wood ruf f said h e was f a irl y familia r with those an d hav e done t h em b efore fo r t h r e e cities . Sai d they are r e a lly a very worthwh i l e in centive fo r e mp l oyees an d cos t s -4- the Districts nothing . Only cost would be slight administrative bookkeeping to make sure correct entries are made on each individual's accotmt. Report swmnarizes plan purpose and benefits to Districts and employees. Authorization on agenda is to prepare resolution --probably at next meeting--adopting plan. Secondly, preparation of several documents necessary for any individual employee that participates in the plan to be executed authorizing amotmts to be deferred. Said he would recommend that we go to Internal Revenue Service and obtain a letter with their ruling and approval. Said he was sure the program would meet their approval and we were not required to go to IRS but if they change their minds later, then program would still be a viable mechanism for employee benefit. FAH added that he felt that this would be one benefit for supervisory personnel on the part of management anticipating that there will be some employee bargaining legislation passed through the State legislature this year, and we don't want to find outselves in a position where we have to tell employees that we really need them. Are trying to show our key people that they are part of management. Winn stated that at meeting of CASA in Palm Springs, two gentlemen spoke indicating that now is the time to get our management personnel into this. It was then moved and seconded to direct General Co\Illsel to prepare the necessary documents. Motion carried. #13 Nominations for Joint Chairman and Vice Joint chairman Winn nominated. Motion nominations be closed for Joint Chairman. Gibbs nominated for Vice Joint Chairman. Moved nominations be closed. #23 DIST. 11 -Other business Duke complimented Chairman Winn for doing a helluva good job toni ght. -5 -