HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-06-1111
COUNTY SANIT ATidN DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX Bl 27. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
June 5, 1975
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11
WEDNESDAY J \.JUNE lL 1975, 7: 30 p IM·.
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
TELE PH ON ES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6 _, 7 and 11 of Orange Coun:tY, California, wi] 1
be held at the above hour and date.
Tentative adjournment prior to next regular meeting:
Executive Conuni ttce -June ll, 1975, 6: 00 p. rn. (immediately preceding Joint
Board Meeting)
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, Calif?rnia
JOINT BOARDS
Regular Meeting
Wednesday, June 11, 1975
7:30 p.m.
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Volley, Cal if., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 71 4
540-2910
962-2411
The .following is a brief explanation of the more important,
non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which
are not otherwise self-explanatory . Warrant lists are not attached
to the agenda since they are made up immediate l y preceding the
meeting , but will appear in the supp l emental agenda available at
the meeting.
No. 9 -Consent Calendar .
The following items fall into this category in accordance with
the definition established by the Boards:
All Districts
No. 9 -a -Determining Prevailing Wage Rates for Construction
Work by Outside Contractors .
. ·.
The State Government Code requires that we adopt , period i ca·11y,
a resolution determining ·the prevailing labor rates for public
works construction · contracts . Since this resolution is quite
lengthy, it is not included in the agenda material although it
will be available for inspection at the meeting. It should be
emphasized that this resolution does not establish wage rates for
our employees; it involves only employees of contractors .engaged
i n construction work fo~ public projects. ·
No. 9 -b -Approving Agreement with County of Orang e for 1975-76
In-Place Density Tests to Determine Re l at ive Compaction o f Sewer
Trench Backfill.
This is a routine action extending the existing agreement
between the Districts and the County Highway Department for soils
testing services in connection with sewer construction projects .
We have found the County's services satisfactory and acceptable to
ourselves and to the various cities in which our projects are con -
structed. In addition, our projects are frequent l y lopated in
County road rights of way and the use of the County 's laboratory
facilities expedites work completion.
No. 9-c -General Authorization for Attendance of Personnel
at Meetings.
For the past several years , the General Manager has b e en
authorized, o n an annual b a sis, to designate members of th e Bo ard
and/or staff to attend meetings, confere n ce s , etc., within t h e
State, which he believes will b e -o f valu e to the Districts. It
is recommended that this authorization be r e newed .
No. 9-d -In-Process Pipe Inspection Services for 1 9 75-76
Fiscal Year.
The staff is recommendi n g the acceptance of the proposal of
Smith~Emery Company for in-process pipe testing for th e coming
fiscal year. Included in the agenda ma terial is a Memor a ndum from
the Districts' Chief Engineer, describing the manner in whic h.the
selection of the testing firm was made.
No. 9-e -Sale of Processed S e wage Slud g e, Sp e cifica t ion No.
S-013.
Pursuant to Board a utho rit y , we a r e t aking bid s on J u n e 1 0 ,
for the sa l e of the s ludge Distr i cts ' pe r sonne l h a ve pro c essed .
Appr o ximat e ly 3600 yards are read y f o r -s hip me nt. The s t a ff will
have a r ecommendation r e l ative to the h i g hest b idder by meeting
time .
No . 9 -f -Cons i derat ion o f Awar d o f Pu mps a n d Dr ive Un i ts f or
the Add i tional Pumping F a cilit i es at t h e Oc e an Outfall Pump i n g
_St a tio n, Plant No . 2 ] Huntingto n Beach, Job · No . J-6 -lB .·
In Sep t e mber, t h e Di stricts rec e i v e d one bid for th e total
~n sta ll at i on and c ons tr uc ti on of two add i t i onal pumping uni ts and
appurte n anc es at t he Di str i cts ' Ocean Ou t f a l l Pumping Station .
The bid r e c e ive d was 27% g reater than the eng i n e er 's e s t i ma t e and
6 0 % grea t e r than th e budge t ed amount . On recommen d ation o f the
staff, t he Boar ds rejected the bid and in struct e d th e staff to
purchase the n ec e ssary major i t e ms of equ ipme nt which we r e e stimated
i n e x cess o f $1 mi ll i o n and hav e th e i n~tallation p e rformed by force
a c co unt or b y contract wo r k. The first equipme nt contr a ct , J -6 -l A,
f o r t h e t wo gas powered eng i nes was a warded b y the Board in February .
J-6 -lB is a n equ ipmen t c ontrac t t o purchase the n e c e ssary pumps a n d
gear d riv e e qu ipment.
Bid s f o r th is equi pme nt we r e so li c it ed fro m seven major pump
s u p pliers, b u t b ecau se o f d e l iver y time l i mi t a t i ons o r t h e i r in-
~bilit y to mee t the pump curves (w h i ch are very restrict i ve to
mat ch e xi s t ing p ump charact e r i stic s ), on ly t wo b i d s ·w e re r ec e i ved.
Th e l o w bid wa s r ece ived fr o m Mcc al l a Bro s ., of San ta Ana , in the
-2-
amount of $345,000, slightly above the engineer's estimate
o f $3 1 4 ,358 .68 . We recommend that the Board approve t'he award
to Mccalla Bros .
No . 9-g -Change Orde r No. 1 -Additional Boiler Facilities
at P l ant No . 2 -Job No. PW -035.
Dur i ng the course of the installat i on of this boiler to
provide additiona l steam for sludge digestion at Plant No. 2,
i t was discovered that there were conflicts in the p lan s between
the new and existing piping. The contractor was instructed to
perform the necessary adjustments on a force account basis . It
is recommended that a change order be approved in the total amount
of $1 ,474 .76 and authorizing an extension of time of 276 cal endar
d ays · needed for reordering the boiler unit as described i n the
change order.
No. 9-h -Comp l etion of Job No. PW -035 -Additional Boi ler
F ac i lit i es at Plant No. 2.
This job was completed on .May 30, 1975 .. The ·cont ractor has
sa t isfactori l y complied with the requirements of the contract .
It is recommended that the customary reso l ution be adopted
accepting the wo r k as comp l ete and author izing -riling of a Notice
of Completion·.
No . 9-i ~ Change Order No. 1 -Job No. P2 -20 -Power Reliability
Project at Plant No . 2.
Dur i ng the course of the contract, it was·determined that
.25 -foot capi l lary tubes were r equ ired for the sensing of the
temperature for the sludge sensing devi ces in lieu of the 15-foot
tubes specified . The contractor provided the 25 -foot tubes at an
additional cost of $2,218 .39. In addition , the contractor was
requested to make certain revisions in the steel flooring at
Power Building "B" where the transformer was to be lo cated as a
part of this contract . The contractor sustained addit i onal lay -
out costs in the amount of $500. These two add items are r ecom-
mended for approval .
It was necessary for the District to suspend the contractor
and have the balance of the work performed by Distric ts' per sonnel
. on a force account basis which was chargeable to the c ontract .
The Districts ' work required to complete the project amounted to
$5 , 3L18. 64 . The staff is therefore recommending approval of this
change order which results in a total deduct of $2 ,630.25 fr om
t he contract . .
-3-
No. 9-j -Completion of Job No. P2-20, Power Reliability
Project at Plant No. 2.
In September, 1972, the Districts received bids on a State
and Federally funded project to improve the power reliability
at Plant No . 2 . Eight bids were received which ranged from
$158,000 to $232,000. The engineer's estimate for this project
was $350,000. One of the major pieces of equipment ~nder this
contract was a 1 2 kv transformer to be installed at Power Building
"B" at Plant No . 2. After placement of the order for this trans-
former, the contractor, the electrical supply company , as well as
the transformer manufacturer were hampered by delays caused by
the s~arcity of materials, particularly aluminum wire nec e ssary
for the construction of this transformer. It was almost two years
before the transformer was delivered to Plant No . 2 .
D~ring this two~year period of ti~e, bec~use of failures on
his · other construction projects, the contractor could not complete .
the work and assigned all responsibility for the completi on of
this contract to the bonding company. $100 ,DOO or more of the
$158 ,000 contract was associated with direct material purchases.
The District s completed the project and have satisfied the re-
quirement's of the contract and the grant .
Mr. Nissen, our former General Counsel, has continued to
represent th~ Districts ' interests in this matter as he has been
directly involved with the bonding company since t he contractor
failed to perform . The final closeout agreement is . being pre-
pared and will be executed by bot h the contrahtor and the bonding
.company prior to this Board meeting. Two stop notices have b e en
filed by labor subcontractors which the contractor and bonding
company are contesting the validity of the amounts associat ed
therewith . A bond will be posted by the bonding company for the
amount of the stop notices. It i s , therefore, recommended that
this job be accepted as complete and the closeout a greement b e
approved . This is the last remaining project of the Districts '
1971-7 2 fiscal year grant program .
District No . 2
No. 9-k -Change Order No. 2 -Contract No . 2-17-1, Carbon
Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer.
P~ior to the receipt of bids, the Yorba Linda County Water
District requested the inclusion of a 12" VCP stub to service
-4 -
the Water District's sewer faciliti es . This work was included
as a part of the District 's contract to be paid for solely by
the Water District. A revision in the p l ans for the Water
District has indicated a delay in the installation of the stub
at this time . The Water Distr ict has, therefore, requested the
deletion of the work associated with their system and the con-
tractor has agreed to de lete those items ass6ciated with this
work. It is therefore recommended that the change order in the
deduct amount of $4,960 be approved.
Distric t No . 3
No. 9-1 -Addendum No . 1 to Contract No. 3-21 -1 .
During the bidding period f or this job (Westside Relief Trunk
Sewer), the District 's consulting engineer, in discussi on s with
the staff o f the Flood Control District, mutually agr eed that the
crossing under the Flood Control Channel near the intersectio n
of the San Diego Freeway and Seal Beach Boulevard cou l d better
be accomplished by a grade adjustment iri th~ proposed trunk sewe~.
This Addendum incorporat ed the grade adjustment and additional
encasement required for the sewer . A copy of this Addendum is
included in your agenda material and it is recommended that it
be approved.
No. 9 -m ~ Award of Contract No. 3-21-1.
rhis re gu larly budgeted project was ·described at the time
the plans and specif~cations were adopted by the Board.· Bids
·were opened on June 3, 1975, and we are happy to announce that the
low bid in the amount of $1,416,448 is $il5,802 under t he engineer's
estimate ($1,53 2 ,250). Seven bids were received which ranged from
the low bid to a high of $1,596 ,320. A bid tabulat i o n is enclosed
with your agenda material and we are recommending adoption of a
resoluti on under this item awarding the contract to A. G. Tutor
Co ., Inc., and N. M. Saliba Company .
No . 9-n -Change Order No. 12 -Contract No . 3 -18 -Knott
Interc eptor .
This change order is recommended by the staff to compensate
the contractor for work directed by the Di strict 's engineer f or
placement of rock bedding in excess of the contract requirements .
Provisions are made for payment at the unit price in the con-
tract specifications . Approval of this change order in the amount
of $4 ,500.93 is recommended.
-5-
Di str ict No. 5
No. 9-o -Change Order No . 1 to Contract No. 5-14R -6.
Subsequent to the award of this contract which is for the
re pair of the Wet Wells at the 14th Street and "A" Street Pu mping
St ations, it was determined that there was a minimal amount of
deterioration of the concrete below the l ow water line in both
of these facilities. After consultation with members of the
staff and the contractor, it was det ermi ned that the contract
should be modified wherein the contractor would not be required
t o gunnite and pl~ce the fiberglass coating in the wet well
below the l ow water line. The Contractor has agreed to a deduct
on this contract in the amount of $4 ,960 .36 . It is recommended
that the Board approve this change order. All work on these
f acilities will be completed before mid -June.
No . 9-p -Annexation No . 6, Harbor View Hills , Sector IV .
The resolution appearing in the agenda is the final a~tion
r equired by the Board to complete the annexation of 6 .3 acres
in the Harbor View Hills area of the City of Newport Beach. The
Local Agency Formation Commissi9n has approved the action and
the proponents have paid $6,396,93 in annexation fees. It is
r ecommended that the action appearing in the agenda be approved.
District No. 7
No . 9-q -Annexation No. 44, Ursino Annexation .
The Local Agency Formation Commission has approved the
District 's application to annex 1 acre in the vicinity of Cowan
Heights Drive and Sirrine Drive . Annexation fees of. $526 have
been received . The staff recommends approval of the resolution
annexing the property to the District .
No. 9 -r -Proposed Annexation No . 47, Rauch Annexation.
Resolution No. 75 -93 -7 authorizes initiation of proceedings
for the annexation o f one acre in the vicinity of Rangeview
Drive and Brier Lane . This will enable the District to serve
a single family residence being constructed on the site . The
staff recommends approval of the annexation .
No . 9-t and 9 -u -Annexation No. 39 , Irvine Industrial
Ann exation .
In February , 1974, the Board approved the .application of The
Irvine Company to annex approximately 315 a cres of industrially
zoned property-within the City of Tustin , ge ner a l ly bounded by
-6-..
the Santa Ana Freeway, Jamboree Road, the Santa Fe Ra i lroad
and Myford Road . This area was withdrawn from the Irv ine
Ranch Water District Sewer Improvement Area . Our Board agreed
to initiate annexation proceedings through the Local Agency
Formation Commission on the conditi on that the intervening 176
acre residential local collection sys tem, which was not a part
o f the proposed annexation , be maintained by Dis trict No . 7 t o
avoid confusion in the City of Tustin regard~n g service.
I t i s the staff 's rec ommendation that an agreement be
entered into with the Irvine Ranch Water District, in form
approved by the Gen~ral Counsel, providing for the maintenance
of the local sewer collection system (comparable to e xi sting
7th Sewer Maintenance Contract) within the reside n tial area at
d i r ect cost plus 15%, and that Resolution No. 75-95 -7, ordering
a n nexation 9f the 315 acres of industrial prop erty , be approved .
No . 9-v -Engineering Services for the Design of t he
Tu stin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Contract No .. 7 -6-8 and 7 -6 -9 .
The District's Master Plan , adopted i 'n 1969, and the
Pr eliminary Engineering Report for the Tusti n -Orange Trunk
Sewer con s ider e d by the Board in March, 1 974, call for the con -
struction of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer wh i ch extends from
the intersection of Mitchell and Red Hill to the norther l y
terminus in Santiago Canyon Road near the intersection of Linda
Vista Street in the City of Orange. Presently , there are two
lower portions of this relief sewer system under construction
(Contracts Nos . 7-6-6 and 7 -6-7) whi ch will be completed this
year to the intersection of Fairhaven Avenue and Esplanade
Street .
Flow measurements in t h e existing facilities indicate that
the North Trunk Sewer serv ing the northern portion of the Dis -
trict is presently flowing full. With the completion of.this
segment of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer , the North Trunk Se.wer
will be r e lieved and the District's Master Plan faci li ties will
be completed with the except ion of a few minor facili ties in
the southern part of the District ifi t he Irvine Comp l ex area .
The staff has requested a proposal from Boyle Engineering
for the design services. A copy o f their proposal is included
in your agenda material . The total project cost for the remain-
i ng portions of the Tustin -Orange Trunk Sew er is estimated at
$1,082,000 . Design services as outlined in the Eng ineer's pro -
posal .are $59,172, minus a credit for the preliminary engineering
in the amount of $5,474, which reduces the fe e for the prepara-
tion of the plans and specifications for the two contracts to
$53 ,698 . It is recommended that t ·he Board accept the proposal
of Boyle Engineering for the preparation of plans and specifi-
cations for Contracts Nos. 7-6-8 and 7 -6 -9 .
-7-..
All Districts
No. 12 -Propos ed Joint Work s Bud gets f o r 197 5-7 6 .
Copie s of the proposed Joint Operating and Joint Con-
struction Budgets for t he 1975-76 fiscal year were included
in a report from the Executive Committee , which was mai led to
all Directors on June 3rd. The Committee met on May 29th
immediately preceding the adjourned Joint Board meeting, but
because of time constraints, t h e members were not able to
review fu lly the Joint Operating and Construction Budgets.
The Committee will meet and consider these matters at. 6:00 p .m .,
Wednesday, June 11, immediately preceding t h e Joint Board
meeting . If any Director ha s any questions concerning the
. budget material mai l ed June 3rd, please cal l Wayne Sylveste r ,
the Districts' Director of Finance, or Fred Harper .
No. 13 -Nom inations for Joint Ch airman and Vice Joi n t
Chairman.
As provided in .the Joint Boards ' Rules of Procedure ,
nominat i ons for these two o ffices are made at the regular June
meeting, wi t h elections to take place at the July re gular Jo i nt
Board meeting . For the new Directors ' informat i on, we have in-
c luded in the supporting documents section of _the agenda material,
an excerpt from the Rules of Procedure for Meet ings relative to
the e l ection of the Chai rman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Adminis -
trative Organization .
District No. 2
No. 25 -a and 25 -b -Abandonment o f Yorba Linda Force Main
Under the Orange Freeway .
Several years ago , pr i or to the construction o f the Orange
Fre eway, the Dis trict installed a portion of the proposed Yorba
Linda Force Main across the State right . of way . Th is portion o f
the f orce main was constructed of r einforced fiberglass pipe and
it was our intention that it be used at a subsequent date as a
part of the force main system diverting flows from the inter-
section of Yorba Linda Bo ul evard and Associated Road to the g ravity
sewer a t Kraemer Avenue, thereby relieving the overloaded Newhope-
Pl acent i a Trunk Sewer . The staff and engineers have completed
the field investigatio n authorized by the Board . Included in the
agenda material is a r eport from our consul t ing engineer which
i s concurred in by the Di strict 's staff , recomme·nding that t his
portion o f the force main be abandoned and that a new section be
construct ed under the freeway · at a cost of approximately $110 ,000 .
-8-
The staff has negotiated with the District's engineers relative
to the additiona l time required to prepare pr ecise plans and
specificatio ns for the added construction. We recommend that
· their design fee for the Yorba Linda Force Main be increased by
$4,200 to reflect the additional work (estimated construction
cost, $110,00b).
District No. 7
No. 28 -Southern Pacific Railroad Compan y Easement ,
Constru ction of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer , Contract No .
1~6-1 ..
Included in the agenda supporting documents is a let ter
report from the District's appraiser, Goode and Goode, recom-
mending that the District proceed with the settlement of temporary
and permanent rights of way as proposed in ou r Chief En gineer 's
letter dated May 29th to the Southern Pacific Transportation
Company. The action appearing on the agenda declares the Board 's
intent to accept a Grant of Easement from the railroad in accord -
ance with the terms of the District's offer dated May 29th .
FAH :j
-9-
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
I
·· .. ~· · BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanil!tion Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
II
MEETING DATE
JUNE 11 1 1975 -7:30 P.M.
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll Call
(3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary
Post Office Box 8127
l 0844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 71 4
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
ADJOURNMENTS POSTED • .':'
COMP & MILEAGE .... ~ .. ..
FILES ~ET UP ...... ~ .... ..
RESOI UTIO;JS CERTIFiED.V.
l.EHERS WRITTEN .... ~ ••
MINlil ES WR:rrrn .. ~
MINUTES HLED .•••. V""'.
(4) Considettttien ef metieft te Feeeive e:ftel file mi1u:ite exee~ts; if aFly,
6ee 5tll'~lemeatal ageRS8
(5) EACH DISTRICT
Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following
as mailed:
~\s District 1 May 14, 1975 regular and
May 29, 1975 adjourned
.N\tS District 2 May 14, 1975 regular and
May 29, 1975 adjourned
M]S District 3 May 14, 1975 regular and
May 29, 1975 adjourned
Mt§ District 5 May 14, 1975 regular and
May 29, 1975 adjourned
~15 District 6 May 14, 1975 regular and
May 29, 1975 adjourned
"1 ts District 7 May 14, 1975 regular and
May 29, 1975 adjourned
"'15 District 11 May 14, 1975 regular and
May 29, 1975 adjourned
(6) ALL DISTRICTS
Reports of:
FILE ... " .......... -
LETTER ···········-
A/C ••.• TKLR ••••
Joint Chairman
General Manager
General Counsel
Special Committee on Industrial Waste Ordinance
(See enclosed report)
meetings,
... (7)
(8)
JWll CALL VOTE.-
... -ITEMS ON
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file certification of th e
Gen e ral Manager that he has checke d all bills appearing on th e a ge nda ,
found them to be in order, and that he recoJJDTiends authoriza tion f or
payment
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote moti on approving Joint Op e rating
and Capital Outlay Revolvin g Fund a ccounts payable check reg i s ters
for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and auth orizing
payment of claims liste d on page "I" ; a n4 approving acc ounts
payable ch e ck registers for signature of the Ch airmen of the
r e spective Dis t ricts, and authorizing payment of said claims
listed on the p ag es indi cated below:
BI STRICT 1 HarraHts, if B:H)'
DISTRI CT 2 warrants -See p age "II"
DISTRICT 3 warr ants -See p age "II"
DIS'f'RIC'fS 3 & 11 "'aspen:5e f1:1nd warrant:3, if aHy
DISTRICT 5 warra nts -Se e page "II "
DISTRICTS 5 & 6 suspens e fund warrants -See p age "II"
DISTRICT 6 warrant:3, if aHy
DI STRICT 7 warrants -'See p~ge ------:-: "III"
DISTRICT 11 narrants, if aHy
(9) ALL DISTRICTS
Ro:I C2ll Vot e or Cast
Un an i mcu> Ballot
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not
requiring discussion or further explanation and lillles s an y particular
item is requested to be removed from the consent c al e ndar b y a Director ,
staff member, or member of the public in attendan ce , t here will b e n o
separate discussion of these items. All items on th e c ons ent c a lendar
shall be considered in the r~gular order of business .
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent
calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their n am e, a ddre s s
and designate by letter the item to be removed from ·the cons ent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Ch a irman will determine if any items are to b e d e lete d f r om t he co ns en t
calendar. ~ ~ '}
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items app e aring on the
consent calendar not specifically r e moved from s ame .
-2-
. . ..~
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
ALL DISTRICTS
~:::::;L(a) Consideration of Standard Resolution No . 75-85, determining prevailing
A/C .... TKLR •••• wage rates to be paid by contractors on Districts' construction
? G~---~ contracts, as required by State law; and rescinding Resolution No. 74-80
I ...............................
FILE -"""/ ~----~~
(b)
A/C •••. TKLR • ..u. __ ...................... .....
I _.......~ .......................... ..
(c)
FI LE ················-
LETTER ............. .
A /C ••.. TKL R ... .
--····················
@--~-==············ (d)
LETTER ......•.....••
N C .... TKLR .•..
--····················· (9e)
ITEMS ON
S~~-~~~ENDA
LElTER ············-
A/C •... TKLR ....
-~?. ..... ~·-··
-·······················
FILE ···········-··-
~·············
A/C •..• TKLR ••.•
:IY.!..:.~.~
-·-··-················· (g)
FILE ................. .
LETTER •.•.••....•.••
A /C .••• TKL R .•••
f!LE •....••.•......••• ...fh) ~?.!'.~
A/C ••.• TKLR .•.•
~
(i)
FI LE ................. .
LETTER ............. .
N C .... TKL R ..•.
Consideration of Resolution No. 75-86, approving agreement with the
Collilty of Orange for 1975-76 in-place density tests to detennine
relative compaction of sewer trench backfill. See page "A"
Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate
members of the Boards and/or staff to attend meetings, conferences,
facility inspections, and other functions within the State of California
which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts; and
authorizing reimbursement for expenses incurred
Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve proposal submitted
by Smith-Emery Company, dated June 3, 1975, for in-process pipe testing
for the 1975-76 fiscal year, at no price increase over the current
year's agreement. See pages "B" and · "C"
Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding Sale of Digested Sewage Sludge,
Specification No. S-013, to Soil Mix, Inc. in the a mount of
$2.10/cubic yard, for. an estima ted total of $7,350.00. Se e
page "IV"
Consideration of Resolution No. 75-87, to receive and file bid
tabulation and reconunendation, and awarding contract for Pumps and
Drive Units for the Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall
Pwnping ~tation, Plant No. 2, Hlliltington Beach, California, Job
No. J-6-lB, to McCalla Bros. in the amount of $345,000.00. See
pages __ "_D_" __ and "E"
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Additional Boiler Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job
No. PW-035, authorizing an addition of $1,474.76 for additional boiler
piping, and granting an extension of time of 276 calendar days required to
reorder the boiler from another supplier, to ·the contract with Porter
Boiler Service, Inc. See page "F"
Consideration of Resolution No. 75 -88, accepting Additional Boiler
Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-035, as complete; authorizing
execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout
Agreement. See page "G"
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Power Reliability Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-20,
granting a time extension of 714 days to the contract with Mel Gorham
Electric Company; and adding additional equipment and flooring revisions
in the amo\Illt of $2,218.39 and deducting for Districts' force account
work to complete said job in the amount of $5,348.64, for a net
deduction of $2,630.25 from said contract. See page "H"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on p age 4)
-3 -
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
FILE ···-·". ·.· .. · •. (j)
(Jgr_!R . , .... ._:_ V"
Consideration of Resolution No. 75-89, accepting Power Reliability
Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-20, as complete; authorizing
execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout A/C ··-·I KLR -···
~ ... ~:~~-~----~-.ti' Agreement. See page "I"
_._ ....... ...............
FILE ·········-···---
LETTER •......•..•.••
we .... TKLR ·-·-
DISTRICT 2
(k) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and
specifications for Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer, Reach 1,
Contract No. 2-17-1, approving a deduction of $4,960.00 from the
contract with Bebek Company due to deletion of items 14 and 15 from
said contract as requested by Yorba Linda Cotmty Water District. See
page "J"
DISTRICT 3
(1) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Westside Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 and
Portion of 27, Contract No. 3-21-1
FILE ·······-·----(m) ~~-· Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 75-90-3, to·receive and file
bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Westside
Relief Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26 and Portion of 27, Contract we .... TKLR .•..
FILE •••••.•••••.••••••
LETTER ...•.••••••.••
we .... TKLR •.•.
No. 3-21-1, to A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Co., in the
amotmt of $1,416,448.00. See page "K"
(n) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 12 to the plans and
specifications for Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18,
authorizing an addition of $4,500.92 for additional rock bedding, to
the contract with A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Co., a Joint
Venture. See page "L"
DISTRICT 5
(o) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Wet Well Repair and Remodeling at 14th Street and
"A" Street Ptnnping Stations, Contract No. 5-14R-6, approving a deduction
of $4,960.36 from the contract with Rewes-Schock, JV, due to changes in
construction methods. See page "M''
-~'~~~p) ~-~~
Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 75-91-5, ordering annexation
of approximately 6.29 acres to the District in the vicinity of the
San Joaquin Reservoir (Annexation No. 6 -Harbor View Hills, Sector IV,
Annexation to Cotmty Sanitation District No. · 5) A/C .... TKLR •••• -...................................... .
DISTRICT 7
FILE --,--··"~ Consideration of Standard Rehsol uD~ion. No .. 75-h92-7 ~ ~r~eringf CannexaHti~nh
r.rn-E~.fa '~.::-i. / of approximately 1 acre to t e 1str1ct rn t e v1c1n1 ty o owan eig ts
~ ·~ V' Drive and Sirrine Drive (Annexation No. 44 -Ursino Annexation to
~ Ale .... TKLR •••• Cotmty Sanitation District No. 7)
...................................... __
............................ __ .............. . (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page S)
-4-
(9) (CONSENf CALENDAR continued £rom page 4)
DISTRICT 7 (Continued)
riLE ···········~···-(r) \ ., ' .
I.ETTER ••• :.. . : •••
Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 75-93-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 1 acre of territory
to the District in the vicinity of Rangeview Drive and Brier Lane
(Proposed Annexation No. 47 -Rauch Annexation to Cotmty Sanitation
District No. 7)
A/C •••• TKLR ••••
File •••.. J.L. .... _
LETTER •••••••••••.••
A/C •••• TKLR -···
(s) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Eddie Nahigan
requesting annexation of approximately 6.934 acres of territory to
the District in the vicinity of Overhill and Miravista Drive,
and refer to staff for study and recommendation. See page "N"
v (t)
.FlLE ............... _
Consideration of Resolution No. 75-94-7, approving agreement with
Irvine Ranch Water District, in form approved by General Counsel, to
operate and maintain the local sewer collection system within the
176-acre residential area excluded from Annexation No. 39 -Irvine
Industrial Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7, pursuant
to the conditions established for said annexation. See page "0"
LETTER ••••••••••••••
A/C .... TKLR ... ..
>~.;~ ................ .
FILE ................. &--
LETTER·····-~
A/C •••• TKLR ....
(u) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-95-7, ordering annexation of
approximately 315.773 acres to the District in the area generally
botmded by the Santa Ana Freeway, Jamboree Road, Santa Fe Railroad
and Myford Road (Annexation No. 39 -Irvine Industrial Annexation
(v)
FILE ..: ••..•.. _ .... '/
LETTER ••..• U:,,
A/C .•.. TKLR ....
to Comty Sanitation District No. 7) See page "P"
Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of
Boyle Engineering Corporation, dated June 2, 1975, for engineering
services in connection with preparation of plans and specifications
for Tustin-Orange Trtmk Sewer, Portion of Reach 12, Reach 13 and
Portion of Reach 14, Contract No. 7-6-8, and Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer,
Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 and 16, Contract No. 7-6-9, for
a total fee of $59,172.00, less a credit for preliminary engineering
study fees received in the amount of $5,474.00, for a total net fee
of $53,698.00. See page "Q"
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
FILE ···········---Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
::E~--~~~--:@ ALL DISTRICTS
... -······-·-·······-Verbal report of the Executive Cammi ttee re meetings of May 29th and Jme 11th
--·-·-··--( 12) ALL DISTRICTS
:1LE ................ ..
,ETrER ............. .
~deration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee:
~Staff report on proposed Joint Works Budget:
(1) 'consideration of motion approving 1975-76 personnel requirements;
vc .... TKL~otr can Vote or Cast ' and adoption of Resolution No. 75-96 amendinR Positions and
··-··-............. .Unanimous Ballot IY\ S Salaries Resolution No. Yl-5, as amended (Copy of reso~ution
in Directors' meeting folders) Ne>TE'. ~ ~n-'~ ......... ~. ~
\,4 'JS· I 1
ROLL CAll vorr .... _
~
ROLL CALL VOTE .• -
(2) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the 1975-76
Joint Operating Budget
(3) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the 1975-76
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (Joint Works Construction)
((;)) Consideration of motion directing the General Counsel to prepare
/Y\~ necessary documents re deferred compensation plan
ALL DISTRICTS
Nominations for Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. See page "R"
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(lS)~T....L-
0 bus in es items, if any
(16) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn ~ '. E f
~ .. /.C .. (17) DISTRICT 3 ~L L Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items
AJC .... TKLR •••• (17) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim submitted -·-·········~\S by General Telephone Company of California, dated June 6, 1975, in
-·········-·mAAs oN the amount of $2,070 .57, relative to the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4,
SUPPlEMENTAL AGENDA Contract No . 3-18, and refer to the District's liability insurance
carrier, as recommended by the General Counsel
(18) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn g· . ..5'2.
ons or upplemental agenda items, if any
(20) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn g" . .S ~
(21) 'DISTRICT 6
iness
(22) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn 8 '..S ~
1_{(23)1 DISTRICT 11 ~ Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(24) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn ~ :5 3
FI LE •• a .... m.«mT ( 2 5) DISTRICT 2
LETIER •• -....,."" (a) Consideration of motion to receive and fi l e report of consulting
AfC .... TKLR ....
-·-················· Ml5>
engineer, dated June 5, 1975, regarding abandonment of portion of
Yorba Linda Force Main mder Orange Freeway . See page "S"
'~·-···~--(b) L ETTER .?,.~
A/C .... TKJ.R ....
~-~--
Consideration of motion to receive, file and. accept propos a l of
Lowry & Associates, dated May 2 3 , 1975, for design of new force main
section under the Oran ge Freeway in connection with construction of
Yorba Linda Force Main, Contract No. 2-16-2, for a lump sum fee of
$4, 200. See p age "T"
(26)(~~
~r business a~n~di--....c=o~mm=:-:un=-:"'1~c~a~t~1~on~s or supplement a l agenda items, if any
(27) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn 8 :53
-6 -
(28) DISTRICT 7
(a)
Fl~-···-·--
LETTER ........... -M l ~
A/C ••.• TKLR •••• '' l
Consideration of motion to receive and file report of Goode & Goode,
dated Jl.llle S, 1975, re appraisal of right of way to be acquired from
the Southern Pacific Railroad Company in connection with construction
of the Tustin-Orange Trtmk Sewer, Reach 11 and a Portion of Reach 12,
Contract No. 7-6-7. See page · "U" ···-··-·················
--.. ·······~'."',..~····" (b) Consideration of motion declaring the Board's intent to accept a ~·!········-·· .. ·-· Grant of Easement from Southern Pacific Railroad Company in accordance
LETTER ~-'.·:.~-~~.:~, -' . with the terms of the District's offer dated May 29, 1975, for an
AIC *.::~_ ... : .. , ,~ amount not to exceed $50 ,000, in form approved by the General Cotmsel.
-················· See page "V"
--------
(29)
(30) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn ~· .5'/
-7-
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
ALL DISTRICTS
. JOINT BOARDS
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS
JUNE llJ 1975 -7:30 P.M.
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telepf-iones :
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AG EH DA
(8) Consideration of roll .c a ll vote. motion approving Joint Opera ting
and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund accounts payable check reg isters
for signature of the Chairman of District No. l, and authorizing
payment of claims listed on page · '~I" ; and approving a ccounts
payable check registers for signatur.e of the Chairmen of the
respective Districts, and authorizing payment of said claims
listed on the pages indicated below:
DISTRICT 1 H8:l'!'flRts, if 8:R)'
DISTRICT 2 warrants See page "II"
DISTRICT 3 warrants -See page "II"
fHS'f'RIC'fS 3 & 11 "u"pense ftind ·..va1;rents, if flfl)'
DISTRICT 5 warrants -See page "II"
DISTRICTS 5 & 6 suspense fund warrants -See page "II"
OIS'fRICT 6 n·arrtrn:ts, if any
DISTRICT 7 warrants -See page ------"III11
DISTRICT 11 warrants, if aRy
(9e) Considera tion of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and
recommend a tion and awarding Sale of Digeste d Sewage Sludg e,
Specific·ation No. S-013, to Soil Mix, Inc. in the amount of
$2.10/cubic y a rd, for . an estimated total of $7,350.00. See
page "IV"
DISTRICT 3
(17) Conside rat i on of motion to rec e ive , fil e and deny claim submitted
by General Te lephone Co mp a ny ·of California, date d June 6, 19 75, in
the amount of $2,0 70 .57, relative to the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4,
Contract No. 3-18, and refer to the District's liability_ insurance
carrier, a s recommended by the Ge neral Coun s el
WARRANT NO.
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
26049
26050
26051
26052
26053
26054
26055
26056
26057
26058
26059
26060
26061 .. ·26062'
26063
26064
26065
26066
26067
26068
26069
26070
26071
26072
2b073
26074
26075
26076 ·
26077
26078
I• 20079
26080
26681
26082
26083
26084
26085
26086
26087
26088
26089
26090
2b091
26092
26093
26094
. 26095
26096
26097
26098
26099
26100
Advance Sales & Service, Truck Parts $
Alex Fish Company, Ecological Research Supplies
All Bearing Service, Inc., Seals & Be~rings
Amac Equipment Co., Switches ·
City of Anaheim, Power
Anaheim Sewer Construction, Lateral Repair
The Anchor .Packing Co., Gaskets & Pump Packing
Artesia Implements & Parts Co., Equipment Rental
Banning Battery Company, Batteries
Beckman Instruments, Metering & .Lab Supplies
Bell Pipe & Supply Company, Valves & Pipe Supplies
Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair
Bender Machine, Inc., Compressor Repair
· Bird Machine ; Centrifuge Parts
Blair Paving, Inc., Paving
Borg-Warner Industrial Drives, Pump Parts
Brenner-Fielder & Associates, Inc., Compress o r Parts
Broadlicks Art Supply, Drafting Supplies
Brookhurst Do'dge, Truck Parts
Bruner & Lay, Tools
C & R Reconditioning Company, Compressor Repair
CS Company, Valves & Compressor Parts .
Cal-State Seal Co mpany, Seals
Cal's Cameras, Photo Supplies & Processing
CASA, Executive Meeting Regi~tration
California Distrj bu t o rs, Equipment Par.ts
R. T. Campbell Co ., Filters
John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Service, JPL Plant
Castle Controls, Inc., Controls
Coast Insurance Agency, Auto Insurance Premium
·college Lumber Co ., Inc., Building Materials
Conneaut Metallic Packing Co., Pump Packing
Consolidated 'El~ctric Distbrs., Electric Suplies
Consolidated Bolt & Nut Co., Hardware
Constructor's Supply Co., Tools
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Farts
County of Orange, Printin g
Crest Leasing, Vehicle Lease
Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplies
Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileag~
Daily Pilot, Bid Notice S-013
C. R. Davis Supply Co., Hose
De Guelle & Sons Glass Co., Glass
Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling
Nick Di Benedetto, Employee Mileage
Ida L. Duesberg, Employee Mileage
Duncan Hunter Co., Hose
Eastman, Inc., Printing & Office Supplies
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring
Fischer & Porter Company, Metering Supplies & Pump Parts
Flippen Mfg. Co., Equipment Parts
City of Fountain Valley, Water
I-1
A.MOUNT
267.80
53.00
97.20
1,059.26
83.46
150.00
516.31
200 .00
253.76
527.51
447.32
19.00
165.78
3,745.61
240.00
107.00
335.47
15.64
14.87
31.09
210.00
927.57
117.93
339.16
15.00
132.16
69.20
17,171.01
259.10
180.00
44.97
22.07
1,546.16
672.22
140.70
531.45
28~8 0
147 .28
40.00
67.44
9 .11
548.61
33.41
100.00
24.90
18.45
203.52
994. 49
3,000.00
642.72
34.38
40.00
..
WARRANT NO.
26101
2bl02
103
2'>104
26105
26106
26107
26108
26109
26110
2blll
26112
26113
26114
26115
... Z.6116
26117
26118
2bll9
26120
26121
26122
2b123
26124
. '29125
26126
IN FAVOR OF
France Products Division, Compressor Parts
Furane Plastic, .Inc., Hardware.
Garden Grove Lumber & Cement Co., Building Materials
Garrett Industrial Supply Co., Equipment Cabinets
General Electric Supply, Electric Supplies
Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine Contract 1-1-75
General Telephone Company of California
Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage
Goldenwest Fertilizer Co., Grit Removal
Graybar Electric Company, Electric Supplies
L. C. Gysin, Employee Mileage
Fred A. Harper, EPA Meeting Expense
Halsted & Hoggan, Inc., Pump Parts
Harrington Industrial Plastics, Pipe Supplies
Harrisons & Crosf ield, JPL Chemicals
Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal
Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease
Holiday Inn of Somerville, Lodging JPL
Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires
Honeywe1i, Inc., Strip Charts
Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies & Tools
City of Huntington Beach, Water
Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Equipment Rental
Huntington Labs, Lab Supplies
ICN Life Sciences Group, Lab Supplies
Industrial Asphalt, Paving Materials
Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware
International Business Machines, Office Supplies
International Harvester Co., Truck Parts
Irvine Ranch Water District, Water
Jensen Instrument Company, Instrumentation Supplies
Jensen Tools & Alloys, Tools
26127
26128
26129
2bl30
26131
2bl32
26133
26134
26135
2bl36
26137
26138
26139
26140
26141
261lt2
26143
26144
26i45
26146
26147
26148
26149
26150
26151
26152
?"""'53
-~54
.Justin Pa~ific Corp., Centrifuge Parts
26155
26156
Kahl Scientific Instrument Corp., Lab Supplies
Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies
Kelly Pipe Company, Pipe Supplies
Kenron Industrial Supply, Tools
King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, V-Belts & Hardware
Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts
Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies
Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware & Tools
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Hardware & Tool Repair
L & N Uniforms Supply Co., Uniform Service
The La.cal Company, Inc., Seals
Judy Lee, Employee Mileage
Los Angeles Times, Annual Subscription
R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., Paving Materials
McCoy Ford, Truck Parts
McCoy Ford Tractor, Tractor Parts .
McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Controls & Hose
Manning Enviromentals Corp., Test Equipment
Ann Martin, Employee Mileage
Master Blueprint & Supply, Printing
Metal Finishing, Technical Journal
Mine Safety Appliances Co., Safety Equipment
Missimers Incorporated, Hardware
I-2
AMOUNT
$ 669.10
132.09
261.56
186.71
121.18
6,335.20
305.16
6.75
3,159.00
201.31
10.05
24.45
534.34
98.80
13,088.88
210.00
429.08
101.89
87.09
77.29
1,121.09
9.11
80. 76
122.47
65.02
9.22
245.90
152.64
162.36
2.05
655.80
233.70
3,419.56
139.30
392.34
466.02
361.t. 71
767.59
3,319.02
404.43
209.98
273.00
3,095.81
64.24
17.85
42.00
306.17
130.10
351.98
380. 71
28.20
2lt. 54
107.01
8.oo
90.61
327.36
WARRANT NO.
26157
26158
26159
26160
26161
26162
26163
26164
26165
26166
26167
. 26168
26169
26170
26171
.26172
26173
26174
26175
2bl76
26177
26178
26179
26180
IN FAVOR OF
Montgomery Brothers, Inc., Pump Parts $
Moore Business Forms, Inc., Paper
E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers
Morrison Company, Pipe Supplies
Musick, Peeler & Garrett, Special Labor Counsel
Nalco Chemical Company, Chemicals
National Chemsearch, Chemicals
National Lumber Supply, Hardware, Tools & Bldg. Mat'ls
City of Newport Beach, Water
Newporter Inn, Lodging
Occidental College, Ecological Trawl
Orange County Appliance Parts, Valve
Orange County Brake, Truck Repair
Orange County Chemical Co., Blueprint Supplies
Or~nge County Stamp Co.; Office Supplies
Orange Paper Products, Inc., Hardware
Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies
Pacific Telephone Company
Parks Crane Service, In~., Crane Rental
M. c. Patten Corporation, Pump ·Parts
Perkin-Elmer, Lab Supplies
Petroleum Dynamics, Engine Parts
Pro-Tech, Inc., Sampling Equipment
Porter Boiler Service, Inc., Boiler Parts & Gasket.s
PostIM.ster, Postage
Premium Rubber Company, Hose
Quality Building Supply, Building Materials
,'. 26181
26182
26183
26184
26185
26186
26187
26188
·REA Express, JPL Freight
'. 26189
26190
26191
26192
26193
26194
26195
26196
26197
26198
26199
26200
26201
26202
26203
26204
2b205
26206
26207
26208
26209
26210
Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal
Red Va.l ve Company, Inc. , Valve
Robbins & Myers, Pump Pa,rts
Ruff's Saw Se~vice, Saw Sharpening
S & C Electric Company, Electric Supplies
Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing
Santa ·Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motor & Motor Repair
Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies
Science Applications, Inc., Hazard Waste Study
Scientific Products, Lab Supplies
City of Seal Beach, Water
Seal Methods, Inc., Gasket Material
Security Industrial Supply Co., Pipe· Supplies & Valve
See Optics, Safety Glasses
Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies
John Sigler, Employee Mileage
Signal-Flash Company,. Barricade Rental
Sims Industrial· Supply, Hardware
Fred Sinasek, Employee Mileage
Snow-Gates & Valves, Steel Gates
Southern California Edison Company
South Orange Supply, Piping Supplies
So. Calif. Coastal Water ~esearch Project Authority,
Share of 75-76 Budget (Resolution 75-64)
Southern California Gas Company
Southern California Water Company
Southern Marine Supply, Hose.
I-3
AMOUNT
76.50
111.94
562. 02 '--"
819.91
1,701.29
582.84
778.31
224.30
5.00
41.74
400.00
99.48
259.50
102.40
106.69
127.20
43.97
.461.46·
216.00
127.29
276.63
345. 92
121.00
72.40
750.'00
190.16
154.23
725.51
62.00
102.37
349.45
31.50
2,778.69
50.61
699.10
301.84
1,000.00
22.54
8.80
230.00
2,898.93
53.27
296.97
40.26
26.00
106.oo
38.46
6,360.00
50,885.39
47.90
79,600.00
1,312.15 ~
3.00
65.72
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
26211
2h212
. >13
26214
26215
26216
26217
26218
26219
26220
26221
26222
26223
26224
26225
.. 26226
26227
26228
26229
26230
26231
26232
26233
26234
26235
26236
26237
26238
26239
26240
26241
26242
. 26243
26244
26245
26246
26247
26248
26249
29250
26251
26264
Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water $
Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Standard Oil Company of Calif., Oil, Gasoline & Diesel
Stang Hydronics, Inc., Hardware
Sully Miller Contracting Co., Paving Materials
Sun Electric Corporation, Electrical Repair
J. Wayne Sylvester, Dir. of Finance, Petty Cash Reimb.
T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Truck Parts
Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage
Taylor-Dunn, Equipment Parts
39 Stake & Building Supplies, Survey Supplies
Thomas Bros. Maps,·Trunk Maps
Trade Paper Company, Mailing Supplies
Truck & Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts
E. F. Tucker, Specification Supplies
United Auto Part$, Truck Parts
United Parcel Service, Freight-Out
United Reprographics, Inc., Printing
U. S. Dept. of Commerce -NTLS, Technical Journal
United States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts
Utilities Supply Company, Tools
Van Waters & Rogers, Odor Control Chemicals
Versa-Tech Development Corp., JPL Te~ting
Paul Vukich, Employee Mileage
Wagner Hydraulic Equipment Co., Pump Parts .
Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage
John R. Waples, R. s., Odor Consultant
Warren and Bailey Co., Inc., ·Compressor Parts
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts
West-Print, Brochure Printing
Western Highway Products, Inc., Safety Signs
Western Salt Company, Salt
.western Wire & Alloys, Welding Supplies
Russell Wold, Employee Mileage
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
World Travel Bureau, Inc., Air Fare, Various Mtgs.
Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage
John M. Wright, Employee Mileage
Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing
Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Services
Donald Winn, Jt. Chairman Meeting Expenses
C. Arthur Nissan, Legal Counsel
AMOUNT
86.50
358. 34
'3, 520. 64
85.86
254.43
80.60
420.96
199.17
43.50
48.67
37.26
2,423.Lt2
89.99
447.05
172.30
33.12
36.30
218.47
75.00
1,591.13
75.68
6,237.88
2,409.55
21.00
39.05
3~. 38
2·22. 90
286.20
740.66
58.35
36.65
162.38
868.35
35.22
3,030.50
25.75
58.38
62.40
2,232.80
·1,626.93
222.93
730.00
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING $ 266,567.76
I-4
WARRANT NO.
26037
2b038
26039
26040
26041
26042
260~3
2604lt
26045
26046
26047
26048
26049
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16'.
Engineers Sales-Service Co., Pumps
Forkert Engineering, Survey Pl-16
Foster-Barker, Communication Equipment
Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Mgmt. Pl-16
McCoy Ford, Truck A-074
McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Chain Hoist
Porter Boiler Service, Inc., Contractor PW-035
Smith Emery Company, Testing Pl-16
Southern Calif. Testing Lab, Testing Pl-16·
Tektronix, Inc., Instrumentation Test ·Equipment
Twining La.boratories, Testing Pl-16
Industrial Indemnity Co., Assignee of Mel Gorham,
Contractor P2-20
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTIAY REVOLVING
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF
I-5
AMOUNT
$ l,587,094.19
7,155.00
300.00
380.50
12,031.44 .
20,856.76
281.59
1,327.28
936.00
333.72
2,149~40
300.00
35,933.37
$ 1,669,079.25
$ 1,935,647.01
DISTRICT NO. 2
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
26012 Clifford Forkert, Right~of-way .services
26'013
26014
26015
26016
26017
26018
26019
29020
26021
26022
26023
26024
26025
26026
26027
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Bebek Company, Contractor 2-17-1
County of Orange, Compaction Testing 2-17-2
Mark Dakovich, Inc.; Contractor 2-12R & 2-17-2
J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation, Contractor 2-15
Lowry and Associates, Engineering Services, 2 14-4, 2-14-5,
2-15, 2-16-1, 2-17-1, 2~17-2, 2-18
Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 2-16-1, 2-17-1
Southern California Testing Laboratory, Soils Testing 2-15
2-17-2
S. S. Zarubica, Contractor 2-18
DISTRICT NO. 3
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOF OF
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 3-18, 3-19, 3-20-1
3-20-2, 3-21-2
County of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-20-1
Mike Prlich & Sons, Contractor 3-19
The Register, Notice 3-21-1
Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 3-20-1, 3-20-2
Sully-Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 3-20-1·
A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Saliba, Contra~tor 3-18 &
II
3-20-2
AMOUNT
$ 4,635.45
$ 149,304.60
221.40
125,405.00
. 16 ;906·. 84
24,686.CO
494.00
363.94
6.2 621. 00
$ 3242002.78
$ 328 638.23 ____ .i...:::..:. ______ ~
$ 25,251.95
116.02
15,206.00
91. 75
3,991.00
536,830.20
412704.07
$ 6232190.99
DISTRICT NO. 5
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS ~
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
26028 State of California, Processing Fee, Annexation 6 $ 85.00
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6
SUSPENSE FUND ·WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
26036 Daily Pilot, Bid Notice 5-14R-6 $ 60.35
II-1
DISTRICT NO. 7
WARRANT NO.
.OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
26029 State of California, Processing Fee, Annexation 44
26030
26031
26032
26033
26034
26035
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 7-6-6
County of Orange, Compaction Testing 7-6-6
Goode & Goode Appraisers, Appraisal 7-6-7
McGuire Construction, Inc., Contractor 7-6-6
Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 7-6-6
George W. and Harriet Willis, Easement 7-6-6
III
AMOUNT
$ 85:00
$ 1,250.00
210. 76
3,775.00
145,188.90
104.00
65.00
$ 150,593.66
$ 150,678.66
B I D . T A B U L A T I 0 N
SHEET
Date June 10. 1975 -11 :00 A.M.
Contract For: SALE OF DIGESTED SEWAGE SLUDGE
Speclficatlon No. S-013
1.
2.
3.
CONTRACTOR
Soi 1 Mix, Inc.
I rv'i ne
Ke 1"1 og g Supp 1 y
Carson
Goldenwest Fertilizer
Santa Aria
UNIT PRICE
$2. 10/cubic yard
$2.05/cubic·yard
$ .55/cubic yard
TOTAL BID
$7,350.00
$7, 175.00
$1,925.00
It is recommended that the award be made to Soil Mix, Inc.
of Irvine, California, in the amount of $2. 10 per cubic
yard ($7,350.00) as the highest and best bid.
v~,.,, Ck:u/g__
William N. Clarke.
AGENDA ITEM #9(c) -IV-ALL DISTRICTS
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
JUNE 11, 1975 -7:30 P~M.
RESOLUTION NO. 75-86
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH TI-IE COUNTY OF
ORANGE FOR IN-PLACE DENSITY TESTS
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF
DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT
WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR IN-PLACE DENSITY
TESTS TO DETERMINE RELATIVE COMPACTION OF
BACKFILL
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Dist.ricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,.
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain agreement dated , by and --------
between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 and the County
of Orange, for the fi.s cal year 1975-76, for conducHng in-place density tests
to determine the relative compaction of backfill connected with the installation
·of sewers within public rights of way by said Districts, is ·hereby approved and
a~cepted; and,
Section 2. That the General Manager be authorized and directed to execute
said agreement on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7
and 11.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 11, 1975.
AGENDA ITEM #9(b) -A-ALL DISTRICTS
CHEMISTS TESTING INSPECTfON ENGINEERS
SI\·llTII-El\'IERY COl\IPANY An lndtptnd1nt Comm1rcial Tutini Laboratory Estab/ish1d 1910
781 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD • LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90021 • (213) 749~3411
3148-0 LA PALMA AVENUE ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 93806 (714) 630-4910
JUNE 3, 1975
MR. RAY E. LEWIS, CHIEF E.NGINEER
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
P • 0 • B o x 81 27
FOUNTA·IN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
Reply To: YouR LETTER DATED
MAY 28, 1975
SuBJEcT: .IN-PLANT PIPE INSPECTION SERVICES
F I SC AL Y E AR , 1 97 5 - 1 97 6 •
·THE FOLLOWl·NG JS I~ RESPONSE TO YOUR LETTER OF MAY 28, 1975
INVITING SMITH-EMERY TO PROVIDE IN-PLANT PIPE FABRICATION
INSPECTION DURING THE 1975 -1976 SERVICE PERIOD. WE ARE
MOST INTERESTED IN PROVIDING THE SERVICES, AND HAVE THE
CAPABILITIES AND EXPERIENCE NEEpED.
IN A RECENT LETTER TO YOU DATED MAY 6, 1975, WE ANNOUNCED
THE RECENT ACQUISITION OF THE Los ANGELES BRANCH OF TESTING
ENGINEERS, INCORPORAT~D BY THE SMITH-~MERY COMPANY. As
NOTED IN THAT LETTER, WE HAVE NOW OPENED AN ORANGE COUNTY
8 R A N C H 0 F F I C E ·w H E R E C E R T A I N SP E C I A L T Y S E R V I C E S A R E B A S E D -
INCLUDING PIPE INSPECTION. MR. Louis L. PERLEY REMAINS AS
HEAD OF ALL PIPE SERVICES.
WE ARE PREPARED TO PROVIDE ALL OF THE SERVICES OF YOUR EX-
1 STING CONTRACT WITHOUT CHANGE IN INSPECTION. OR SUPERVISION
RATES. UNDER SUCH AN AGREEMENT, SMITH-EMEAY WILL FURNISH A
QUALIFIED INSPECTOR FOR ~13.00 PER HOUR. THE STANDARD TERMS
AS SHOWN IN THE ENCLOSED FEE SCHEDULE WILL APPLY. SUPER-
VISION BY ~R. PERLEY AT $13.00 PER HOUR, NOT TO EXCEED 20
H 0 UR S P ER WE EK • B .A SE D 0 N . A 1 60 H 0 UR M 0 N T H P ER MAN A T E AC H OF
2 PLANTS, PLUS SUP E·R V I SI 0 N , THE C 0 ST PER MONTH SH 0 UL D BE
APPROXIMATELY S5494.00. THIS FIGURE WILL INCREASE OR DE-
CREASE IN PROPORTION TO THE HOURS WORKED.
ENCLOSE~, IS A LIST SHOWING INITIALS OF INSPECTORS CURRENTLY
ON THE SMITH-EMERY STAFF, AND THEIR RESPECTIVE YEARS OF EX-
PERIENCE IN THE PIPE FIELD. ALSO ENCLOSED, ARE FOUR COPIES
AGENDA ITEM #9(d) B-1 ALL DISTRICTS
MR. RAYE. LEWIS, CHIEF" ENGINEER
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DIST.
JUNE 3, 1975
PAGE 2 -CONT.
or TYPICAL PIPE REPORT FORMS TAKEN AT RANDOM FROM OUR
CURRENT FILES.
WE APPREC.IATE YOUR CONSIDERATION OF SMITH-EMERY AND THE
OPPORTUNITY TO SUBMIT THIS PROPOSAL. WE LOOK FORWARD TO
WORKING WITH YOU AND YOUR STAFF.
DMF:Ks
VERY TRULY YOURS,
SMITH --.EMERY COMPANY ,..
i · : /I/,~ j_/ / / . . >lJ. c.;; cc' J.-. ·/ / · d '2li 1c_1E';1 DE N N 1 s Mc FA~ n ~.w(' M AN AG ER
ORANGE COUNTY OPERATIONS
ENCLOSURES: (4) COPIES P!PE REPORTS
FEE ScHEDULE
AGENDA ITEM #9 ( d) B-2 ALL DISTRICTS
CouNTY SANITATION DiSTRICrS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108H ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9270r
(71.4) ~40-2910 '-"
(71") 962-2411
S T A F F R E P 0 R T
June 4, 1975
Subject: In-Plant Pipe Inspection Services for Fiscal Year 1975-76
To assist the staff in the implementatlon of the Districts' trunk sewer
program, it has been the.policy in the past to employ the services of an
Independent testing laboratory to provide the. in-plant pipe inspection
services required. Because the efforts associated with the trunk sewer
expansion program will cease in approximately two years, it does not
appear economical at this time to change our past policy and perform this
work with permanent District employe~s.
Proposals have been solicited from three responsible testing laboratories
which are familiar with this type of work and have performed satisfactorily
with the Districts in the past. Of the three proposals submitted,
Smith-Emery Company of Los Angeles and Anaheim has proposed to provide
the necessary services for the 1975-76 fiscal year at the same per diem
rates as charged to the Districts for the 1974-75 fiscal year. This
rate was $13.00 per h6ur for qualified field inspectors. The comparable
rates submitted by the other two lah0ratories were $13.90 and $15.00 oer
hour. It is, therefore, recommended that the Board accept the proposal from
Smith-Emery Company to perform the in-plant pipe inspeccion services for
the 1975-76 fiscal year. The cost of this service for the 1974-75· fiscal
year is estimated at approximately $60,000. It is estimated that the cost
for this service for the next fiscal° year should be approximately the same
amount. Attached with this report is the summary of the Districts'
contracts pipe size and the linear footage associated therewith. Each of
these contracts will require in-plant pipe inspection.
REL:hje
AGENDA ITEM #9(d) C-1 ALL DISTRICTS
PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF WORK
IN-PLANT PIPE INSPECTION
1974-75 FISCAL YEAR
~ CONTRACT NO. PIPE SIZE LINEAR FEET
2-14-3 60" 673
51" 307
2, 100
796
1,183
380
907
525
90
48" 247
6,986
1,768
120
951
4 5" 176
33" Clay 2,490
2-14-4 -51" 5,204
2,149
1,240
650
350
1,300
45" 3,353
2,100
1,000
42" 891
1,450
2,000
·398
2-14-5 45" 820
2,150
789
465
590
400
42" 2,285
2,122
39" 2,635
101
158
200
3-20-2 63" 6,600
72" 3,900
3-20-3 72" 9,520
42" 6,930
3-20-1 66" 6,000
AGENDA ITEM #9(d) C-2 ALL DISTRICTS
RESOLUTION NO. 75-87
AWARDING CONTRACT NO. J-6-lB
A RESOLUTION OF TI-IE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PUMPS AND DRIVE UNITS
FOR TI-IE ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES AT THE
OCEAN OlITFALL PUMPING STATION, PLANT NO. 2,
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, JOB NO. J-6-IB
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7 ~nd 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Sec~ion 1. That the written recommendation this 'day submitted to the
Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer that award of contract be
made. to McCALLA BROS. for PUMPS AND DRIVE UNITS FOR THE ADDITIONAL PUMPING
FACILITIES AT TI-IE OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION, PLANT NO. 2, HUNTINGTON BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, JOB NO. J-6-lB, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for
said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That the contract for said Job No .. J-6-IB be awarded to
McCalla Bros. in the total amount of $345,000.00, in accordance with the terms
of their bid and the prices contained therein; and,
Section 3. That the _Chairman and the Secre.tary of District No. 1, acting
for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor
for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract
documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at. a rE'.gular meeting held June 11, 1975.
AGENDA ITEM #9 (f) -D-ALL DISTRICTS
B I D TABULATION
SHEET
Da. te . June 3, 1975 -11 : 00 A. M.
Contract For: PUMPS AND DRIVE UNITS FOR THE ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES
'AT THE OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION, PLANT NO. 2, HUNTINGTON
BEACH, C~LIFORNIA
JOB NO. J-6-lB ·Engineer's Estimate $314,358.68
1.
2.
3.
4.
5 •.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
CONTRACTOR
Mc Ca 11 a Bros.
Santa Ana
Patterson Pump
Toccoa, Georgia
AGENDA ITEM #9(f)
TOTAL BID
Schedule A Schedule B Schedule C
$345,000.00
$149,983.00 $199,983.00 $349,963.00
-E-ALL DISTRICTS
cou:~TY SA:UTATIO:.: J>Isn:JCTS OF O!'.A:~GE cou::TY
p • 0 • B 0 x s 1 z 7 -1 0 :3 .,,. E 11 i:; I\ v {' ll u c
1:ountain Vallc;y, California H2708
. CllA:--ZGE OIU>ER
CO:ffRACTOR: Porter Boiler Service, Inc.
c.o. ~o._~1-----~~~~~~
DATE May 29, ___ 1_9_7-'-S __ _
JOU: Additional Boiler Facilities at Plant ~o. 2 1 .Joh No. PW-035
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (D.ElJXJCT) $1,474.76
In accordance ·with contract provisions, the followinr; changes in the
contract and/or contract h'ork arc hereby authori:,cd· and as co1:-ipcnsation
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from tl1c.contract price arc
hcrcb)· approvctl.
ADD:
For rerouting of boiler piping where
conflicts with existipg piping were
not shown on plans· ADD
TOTAL ADD
$1,474.76
$1,474.76
Extension of Time
The original boiler supplier.went out
of business and this time extension was
necessary so that the contractor could
reorder and obtain a boiler from another
supplier. The contractor 'is hereby
granted an extension of contract time of
TOTAi TIME EXTENSION
276 Calendar Days
276 Calendar Days
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT ·rnrn.
Original ~ontract bate
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension This Change Order
Total Time Extension
.. February·2s, 1974
180 Calendar Davs
August 27, 1974,
276 Calendar Davs
276 ·calendar Da~s
456 Calendar Da~s Revised Contract Time
Revise~ Completion Date May 3 0, 19 7 5 .
Original Contract Price $ 37 573.00
Prcv. Auth. Changes $ 0. 00
This Change (ADD)(.~ $ 1 4 74. 76
~--'--~'------~
Amended Contract Price .s 39,047.76
Hoard authorization date: June 11, 1975 Approved:
By __ ~----------~-r-~----~--~·~ Consulting hng1nccr
By ____________ ._..------~~:-::-::-:::-= Cont.ractor
AGENDA ITEM #9(g) -F-·
COUNTY SANITATIOi~ DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
ALL. DISTRICTS.
RESOLUTION NO. 75-88
ACCEPTING JOB NO. PW-035 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,. 5, 6, 7 AND 11
OF o·RANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO.
PW-035 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT
AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * *
1he Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section L That the contractor, Porter Boiler Service, Inc., has completed
the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for ADDITIONAL BOILER.
FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-035·, on the 30th of May, 1975;. and,
Section 2. That the Districts' Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance
.of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the ~ontra~t;
which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 3. That Additional Boiler Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-035,
is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor,
dated the 28th of Fepruary, 1974; and,
Section 4. That the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Porter Boiler Service,
Inc. setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Additional Boiler
Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-035, is hereby approved; and,
Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary. of the Board. of Directors of
District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on
behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of
Orange County, California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 11, 1975. ·
AGENDA ITEM #9(h) -G-.ALL DISTRICTS
cou:~TY SA:UTAHO:~ DISTl~JCTS OF OP.1\::GE cou::TY
P. O. Box 3127 -1og~4 Elli~ Avenue
Fountain Valley, ~alifornia 92708
CHANGE OIWER
C.O. NO.
CONTRACTOR: Met Gorham Electric Company
~~~~~~~~~~
DATE Hay 30, 1975
JOB: Power Retlabltlty Project at Pt<1nt No. 2 -Job No. P2-20
Amount of this Change Order (x);JX~~ (DEDUCT) $ 2,630.25
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the
contract an<l/or contract '~ork arc hereby authorized and as cor.ipcnsatiOi1
therefor, the following a<lditions to or dc<luctions from the contract price arc
hercb)· approvc<l.
A. REFERENCE:-Districts' letters dated December 8, 1972, January 9, 1973
May 14, 1973 and Hay 18, 1973
ADD:
Contractor's letters dated January 3, 1973, May 15, 1973
Hay21, 1973andApril 17, 1974
25' capillary tubes on sludge and hot water temperature
controllers
B. REFERENCE: Districts' letter of December 4, 1974
~: Rev.lsions to steel flooring plans
C. REFERENCE: Districts' letter of April 29, 1975.
ADD 2,218.39
ADD 500.00
DEDUCT: Work accompl !shed by Districts' employees ·DEDUCT 5,348.64
TOTAL DEDUCT $2,630.tS
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension this Change Order
Total Time Extension
Revised Contract Time·
Revised Completion Date
Board authorization date:
June 11, 1975
By--------~----~----,.-~~~ Contractor
AGENDA ITEM #9(i)
714 Calendar Days
September 18, 1972
270 calendar days
April 14, _1973
714 Calendar Days
714 Calendar Days
984 Calendar Days
May 30, 1975.
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
$ 158 294.oo
$ __ __._o ....... o __ o ___ _
This Change ~AXID'J (DEDUCT) $ 2 ,630. 25
Amended Contract Price s 155,663.75
-H-
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By __ ~~~~~~~~~~c~1-11~c--£.,.......t~-1-1r,-.-11_1_c_c_r
ALL DISTRICTS
r
RESOLUTION NO. 75-89
ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-20 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF TI-IE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-20
AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * *
The Boards. of Directors of County Sanitation Districts· Nos. l, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7 and 11 of Orange County; California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That ~he contractor, Mel Gorham Electric Company, has completed
the construction in accordance with the tern~ of the contract for POWER RELIABILITY
PROJECT AT PL~T NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-20, on the 30th of May, 1975; and,
Section 2. That by letter, John Carollo Engineers, Districts' engineers,
have recommended acceptance of said work as hav1ng been completed in accordance
with the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the Districts has concurred in said
engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and
ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That Power Reliability Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-20,
is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract
therefor, dated the 18th of September, 1972; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby auth.orized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Mel Gorham Electric Company
setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Power Reliability Project
at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-20, is hereby approved; and,
Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of
District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on
behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of
Orange County, California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 11, 1975.
AGENDA ITEM #9(j) -I-ALL DISTRICTS
• <
cou;ny SA:UTAT10:-: 1>1!m~1ns or cw,\::r.E cou::TY
P. o. Uox 8127 -lOHH Elli~ ,\v(·nuc
1:ountain Vull~y, C;1lifornia 92708
CllA~GH OIU>Elt
·.
·. C. O. NO. 2
co:ffRACTOR: BEBEK COMPANY I>ATE _J_u_r-ic-1-1-,-1 .... 9-,-5---
JOB: CARBON CANYON-PALM DRIVE INTERCEPTO.R SEWER, REACH 1, CONTRACT NO. 2-17-1
Amount of this Change Order ~lxlki~) (DEDUCT) S 4 960 no
In accordance with contract provisions, the:' following changes in the
contract an<l/or contract l>ork arc hereby authoriz.cJ and :lS co::ipcnsation
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the.contract price arc
hereby approved •
. Referen~c: Yorba Linda County Water District's
letter to the District dated
April 30, 1975 .
DEDUCT: ..
The following items are deleted from the contract.
Item 14 -· 66 L.F. of 12" VCP at $60/ft. $3,960.00
Item 15 -remodeling of the manhole for lump sum 1,000.00
Summary of Contract.Time
Original Contract· Date
Original Contract Time
Origina1 Completion ·Date
'
Time Extension This Change Order
Total Extension of Contract Time
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
TOTAL DEDUCT. $4, 960. 00
December 26, 1974
180 Calendar Days
, June 24, 1975
0 Calendar Days
0 Calendar Days
180 Calendar Days
June 2 4 , 19 7 5
Original Contract Price
Prcv. Auth. Changes
$733,147.00
This Chan&e (')\1})}.) (DI;DUCT) $ 4, 960. 00
Amended Contract Price 5728,187.00
Hoard authorization date: June 11, 1975 Approved:
COUt-iTY SJ\~ITATIO~J DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By ______________ ~----~------~
Consulting t11g1nccr
By---------------------,.--::---~-'." Contractor
AGENDA ITEM #9(k) -J-DISTRICT 2
B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N
SHEET
Date. June 3, 1975 -11:00 A.H.
Contract For: ~ESTS I DE RELi EF INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 25, 26 & PORTION OF 27,
'CONTRACT NO. 3-21-1
FROM WESTSIDE LIFT STATION TO KATELLA AVENUE & LEXINGTON DRIVE
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
CONTRACTOR
A. G. Tutor Co., Inc·. & N. M. Saliba Co.
North Hollywood
Risto Construction Co., Inc.
Arcadia
Mike Prlich & Son
South El Monte
John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc.
Paramount
R. E. and R. W. Crane, Inc.
Long Beach
Henson Construction, Inc.
Bell Gardens
Bebek Company
Irvine
AGENDA ITEM #9(rn) -K-
Engineer's Estimate $1 ,5~250.00
TOTAL BID
$1,416,448.oo
·$1,444,980.00
$1,474,846.20
$1 ,478,380.00
$1,496,934.oo
$1,521,643.00
$1 ,596,320.00
DISTRICT 3
cou:rtY SA:J l'f ,\Tl o:-; I) I !;T}~·J crs OF Ol~i\::r.E cou::TY
P. O. Box 8127 -IoaH Elli:; ,\vC'nuc
1=ount~in Valley, C:1liforni:i ~J2708
t.o. NO. 12
CllA~GH OIU>i:R
A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba,
co:al~J\CTOR: a joint venture ~~~~---~~~----1> J\ TE Jun(' 11, 1975
JOU: . KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REAQI 4, CONTRACT NO. 3-18
Amount of this Change Order (AUD) (I>'1m11~) . $ 4,500;93
In acc·or<lancc with contract prpvis·ions, the .following changes in the
con~rac t antl/ or contract work a re hereby author i:;: ctl and as c01:1pcnsa t ion
therefor, the followin~ additions to or dc<luctions· from the contract price arc
l1crcby approvcJ.
Reference: Schedule·of Prices and Section 109
of the O~tailed Specifications
ADD:
The Contractor was directed to place one
(1) foot of rock bedding from Station 334+03
to Station 337+65 and two (2) feet of
additional rock bedding from Station 337+65 to
Station 341-t;,67
367.85 c.y. @ 7.50 =
193.56 c.y •. @ 9.00?
·$2,758.88
1,742.04
TOTAL J.DD: $4 ,500. 9 2
No time exten~ion allowed for this change order.
Original Contract Price
Prcv. J\uth. Changes
Amended Contract Price
$ 4,334,412.oO·
$ 145,604.06
4,500.92
s 4,484,516.98
Hoard authorization date: June 11, 1975 Approved:
By ____ ~~-------·..--~-------....----~-Co n s ult mg .flngrnccr
By--------------------,.~~~~ ·Contractor
AGENDA ITEM #9(n) .. L-
COUl'TY SJ\NITATIO~J l>TSTRIC:TS of
Orange County, California
DISTRICT 3
·.1
....
t.:OU:~TY !:>A;, 1 TAT Jo:.: I> I !;TJ~ J CfS or CWA:!GE cou::TY
P. O. Box SlZ7 -1'Hi·l•l Elli:; ,\y(•nuc
Fount a i n V ~L 11 ~ y , ~ ~• l i fo r n i :1 !>2 7 O 8
CllA~GE OIU>i:R
·C. O. NO.
CO:ffr:.ACTOR: Rewes-Schock, JV DATE _J_u_n_e_..,....1.,...1 .~1..,...9"'"75~----
Wet Weil Repair and Remodeling at 14th Street and "A
JOB: Street Pumping Stations, Contract No. S-14R-6
Amount of this Change Order ~~~ (DEDUCT) $ 4 ,960. 36
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the
contract an<l/ or contract t-t•or k arc here by au th or i z cu an<l as co1:ipcnsll t ion
therefor, t!1c following acld it ions to or dc<luc t ions· from the con t-ract pr ice arc
hereby approved. ·
REFERENCE: District's letter dated May 22, 1975 .
. DEDUCT:
Item 1
I tern 2
The Contractor wtll not be requi(ed to apply
gunite and fiberglass coating below the low
·water line at 14th Street Pumping Station
The .Contractor will not be required to apply
gunite and fiberglass coating below the low
water line at 11 A11 Street Pumping Station ·
No time extension this change order
TOTAL DEDUCT
Original·Contract Price
Prcv. Au th. Changes
This Change M:~~ (DEDUCT)
Amended Contract Price
1,858.18
3, 102. 18
$ 4,960.36
$ 22,960.36
$ o.o·o
$ ~.960.36
s 18,000.00
lloard authorization date: Approved: .
June 11, 1975
By~~~~~~-------.!'-:-"'.---,..~~~ Consulting Engineer
By ____ .:.-~~--------~.,..-::-:'."=-::-::-::~= Contractor
AGENDA ITEM #9(o) -M-
COU?\TY SANITATION I>ISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
DISTRICT. $
Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Dear Sirs:
May 2·0, 197 5
Re: Our Job No. 72632
We hereb.y request that the property shown on the attached
sketch be conside~ed for annexation to Orange County Sanitation
District No. 7 and the appropriate Orange Co~nty.Maintenance
District.
Enclosed is a check in the amount of $325.00 made out to the
Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 and a check in the
amount of $10.00 made out to LAFC for your use. We would
appreciate your expediting this matter.
zh
Enclosures
17782 SKY PARK BOULEVARD
AGENDA ITEM #9(s)
•
Sincerely yours,
~·72d~~
Eddie Nahigan p
IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92707
-N-
• (714) 549-2222
DISTRICT .7
RESOLtrrION NO. 75-94-7
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH IRVINE RANCH WATER
DISTRI'CT RE SERVICE OF RESIDENTIAL AREA
OUTSIDE DISTRICT NO. 7
A RESOLlITION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH IRVINE Rfu"-.JCH
WATER DISTRICT FOR OPERATING AND MAINTAINING
LOCAL SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM LOCATED OUTSIDE
DISTRICT NO. 7
* * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has heretofore adopted Resolution No. 74-38-7
authori'zing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 270 acres of territory
in the vicinity of the area generally bounded by the Santa Ana Freeway, Jamboree
Road, Santa Fe Railroad and Myford Road, to provide sanitary sewer service to said
territory; and,
WHEREAS, said resolution provided that a co_ntractual arrangement between
District No. 7 and the Irvine Ranch Water District to operate and maintain the
local sewer collection system within the 176-acre residential area excluded
from the proponent's original annexation request so service would be provided by
.the same entity within the City of Tustin, as a condition of said annexation; and,
WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission has approved said annexation
and authorized the District No. 7 Board of Directors to approve same, which said
annexation is titled "Annexation No. 39 -(Irvine· Industrial Annexation) to Collllty
Sanitation District No. 7".
NOW,. THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange Co1mty, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. 'Ihat the certain agreement dated by and between
~~~--------~--
County Sani ta ti on District No. 7 of Orange Cow1ty and the Irvine Ranch Water
District, wherein District No. 7 agrees to operate and maintain the local sewer
collection system within the 176-acre residential area excluded from Annexation
No. 39 -Irvine Industrial Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7, is
AGENDA ITEM #9(t) 0-1 DISTRICT 7
hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That Lrvine Ranch Water District pay· Cotmty Sanitation
District No. 7 for said services based on cost plus 15%; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of Cotmty Sanitation
District No. 7 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in
form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 11, 1975.
AGENDA ITEM #9(t) 0-2 DISTRICT 7
._, ..
RESOLUTION NO. 75-95-7
ORDERING ·M1NEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT
(ANNEXATION NO. 39 -IRVINE INDUSTRIAL ANNEXATION)
A RESOLlITION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE
DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 39 -IRVINE INDUSTRIAL
ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7)
* * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange
County, California,
.DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to County Sanitation
District No. 7 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a petition
filed by the property owner; and,
Section 2. That, pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of
1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, application
has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation
of said territory to "cotmty Sanitation District No. 7 by means of Resolution
No. 74-38-7, ~iled with said Commission by the District; and,
Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory
proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 39 -(Irvine Industrial Annexation) to
County Sanitation District No. 7", the exterior boundaries of which are described
on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a
part of this resolution; and,
Section 4. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and,
Section 5. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and
provide sanitary sewer service to said territory; and,
Section 6. That provision for payment of annexation fees in the amount of
$135,150.84 has been satisfied; and,
AGENDA ITEM #9(u) P-1 DISTRICT 7
Section 7. 1bat, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation
Commission pursuant ·to Division 1 (Distri~t Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 ~
of the Government Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and
described hereinabove, be and it is hereby ordered annexed to County Sanitation
District No. 7 without notice or hearing and without election.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting hetd June 11, 1975.
AGENDA ITEM #9(u) P-2 DISTRICT 7
. -. '-,'. . .
I ••• •• i' ~' L'... .. ~ .' {.
Board of Directors June 2, 1975
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
OF ORANGE COUNTY
Attention lv\r. Fred A. Harper, Genera I /v\anager
P. 0 . Box 8127
Fountain Va I ley, CA 92708
Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer
Portion of Reach 12 and Reaches 13, 14, 15, an·d 16
Pursuant to Mr. Lewis' request; we are pleased to submit our proposal for furnishing
professional engineering services for the preparation of final plans and specifications
for subject trunk sewer as set forth in the preliminary engineering report dated
February 1974.
These reaches are a continuation of Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer sections currently under
construction as Contracts Nos. 7-6-6 and 7-6-7. The trunk when completed wil I serve
the centre I portion of the district north of the Santa Ana freeway and relieve the North
Trunk Sewer which is presently flowing full. The project begins at the termination of
Contract No. 7-6-7 at Fairhaven Avenue and Esplanade Avenue, runs easterly to
Fairhaven Avenue and Esplanade Street, then northerly on Esplanade Street to Spring
Street, easterly on Spring to Santiago Boulevard, then northerly on Santiago to Hewes
Street, northerly on Hewes to Santiago Canyon Road, and then northeasterly on Santiago
Canyon Road to the intersection of Linda Vista Street, where it will connect to existing
city of Orange sewer facilities. Total length of the project is approximately 3.2 miles.
The total estimated cost, which includes construction, ~ngineering, design surveying,
construction staking, construction inspection, in-plant inspection, lega I and adm in i-
strative, easement acquisition, and incidental costs, is $1,082,000. The preliminary
engineering report for this facility has been reviewed by t~e city of Oraf"!ge and the
county of Orange. Also, a draft environmenta I impact report for the Tustin-Orange
Trunk Sewer, Reaches 10 through 18, has been prepared, hearings held, and the environ-
menta I impact report .certified by the district.
It is proposed that construction of the project be accomplished under-two contracts. The
remaining portion of Reach 12, Reach 13,. and a portion of Reach 14 would be Contract
·No. 7-6-8, beginning at Fairhaven Avenue and Esplanade Avenue and terminating at
Spring Street and Santiago Boulevard. This contract would be coordinated with the
AGENDA ITEM #9(v) Q-1 DISTRICT 7
County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County -2-June 2, 1975
county of Orange Road Department, which is proposing street improvements in an area
bounded by Chapman Avenue, Esplanade Street, Spring Street, and Santiago Boulevard.
The county work is being phased and at present it is proposed.to build the sewer in
Esplanade Street north of Chapman and Spring Street this fa 11 prior to the roadway improve-
ments by the county. The remaining portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 and 16 would
constitute Contract No. 7-6-9, which would run from Santiago Boulevard and Spring Street
to the end of the project at Linda Vista Street and Santiago Canyon Road.
We will provide the following professional engineering services for the final plans and
specifications and construction phases of the proposed project, based on two individua I
contracts as outlined above. ·
1. lv\ake arrangements for and_ coordinate fie Id surveys, gather benchmark data, existing
surveys, etc. If pavement coring is required for final design, make arrangements for
outside services.
2. Research underground utilities records. Includes both fie Id and office contacts with
public and municipal utility companies.
3. As required to avoid conflicts between proposed project work and existing utilities,
make arrangements for exploratory holes to expose existing utilities for position and
elevation. Obtain excavation permits. Solicit prop.osals from contractors if district
forc~s are not available for exploratory work. Contact city_ and county inspection
departments. N\ark and s.urvey exposed utilities.
4. Prepare engineering data for regulatory permit applications that may be required by
the city of Orange, Orange County Road Department, the Orange County Flood
Control District, and the State Division of Highways.
5. Prepare detailed plans and specifications.
6. Review preliminary and final plans and specification·s with the city of Orange, Orange
County Road Department, and the State Division of Highways. Receive traffic control,
detour, and pavement replacement requirements.
7. Process final plans and specifications through State Division of Highways.
8. Process final plans through utility companies.
9. Process storm channel undercrossings through Orange County Flood C'antrol District.
10. Prepare estimates of quantities and costs.
AGENDA ITEM #9(v) Q-2 DISTRICT 7
.'
County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County -3-June 2, 1975
11. Deliver original tracings of plans and reproducible plates of the specifications for the
district's use in preparing the necessary number of copies for record purposes and dis-
tribution to prospective bidders, etc.
12. Prepare lega I descriptions and plats for right-of-way acqu is it ions as required for
facility location and construction.
13. Assist the district in securing bids, in the tabulation and analysis of bid results, and
in letting of the contract.
14. Attend pre~ward conferences with contractor, district staff, city of Orange, Ora~ge
Coun.ty Road Department, and the State Division of Highways.
15. Check shop and working drawings as may be submitted by the contractor.
16. Review laboratory reports on material tests and inspection and correlate such reports
with the intention of the plans and specifications.
17. Furnish consultation and advice to the district or its agent during construction.
18. Observe initial operation of the project, witnessing performance tests as required
by the specifications~ and report same to the district.
19.. ~ke a fina I inspection and report of the completed project with a representative
of the district or its agent.
20. · Prepare record drawings when construction work has been completed and accepted
by the district. This shall mean the original tracings of the plans will be modified
if necessary because of deviations from the original work. Since the district will
carry out inspection of the project, modifications to the original tracings will be
based upon information supplied to the engineer by the district. The origina I
tracings, after modification, wil I become district property.
Our total fee for the proposed project, including the preliminary engineering phase of
the design and construction phase, is $59, 172. In accordance with our agreement for
preliminary engineering study fees, we will credit $5,474 toward the total fee, leaving
a remaining fee of $53,698. For district accounting purposes, we suggest the fee be
divided as follows: $33,830 for Contract No. 7-6-8, and $19,868 for Contract No. 7-6-9.
It is also suggested that payment be monthly on a percentage-complete basis up to 90 per-
cent at time of delivery of plans and specifications, with 100 percent payment when work
~ is completed and accepted by the district.
AGENDA ITEM #9(v) Q-3 DISTRICT 7
County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County -4-June 2, 1975
Field surveys will be required in order to prepare the plans and specifications. These surveys
will include taking topography and culture within the project limits. We propose that all
field surveys necessary for design be performed on a per diem basis at the following hourly
rates: (1) three-man survey party -$60/hour, (2) two-man survey party -$48/hour, and
(3) licensed surveyor -$22/hour. Payment is to be monthly as invoiced. If construction
staking is requested, these rates will remain in effect until. June 30, 1976, at which time
they would be subject to rev is ion •
• We propose that all outside services required and approved by the district, such as pavement
coring, pl~nt inspection for quality control, and materials used on the project construction,
be paid directly by the district upon presentation of a statement for such outside services
with the eng ineer 1 s certifications.
If we are authorized to proceed .with this work at the June 11, 19.75, board meeting, we
can have plans and specifications ready for advertising bids in October 1975 on Contract
No. 7-6-8, and in January 1976 on Contract No. 7-6-9 .•
BOYLE ENG !NEERING CORPORA TJON
, ~\
I ,' I , ~ / ' . "/T.'r I (_,.( J.fj_,/. ,,. I\ ,,. ~, , " :...-t--' _/'i I.• /'-t.. ""''-' _.. . ~/~
Conrad Hohener, Jr., PE
Vice President
AGENDA ITEM #9(v) Q-4 DISTRICT 7
<EXCERPTED FROM. RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR MEETINGS)
8. CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE
ORGANIZATION ·-A Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administra-
tive Organ~zation shall be elected by a majority vote of the Districts
at the regular meeting in July of each year. The Chairman and Vice
Chairman shall serve at the pleasure of the majority of the Districts.
The nominations for Joint Chairman shall be made at the
regular Board meeting in June each year, and the nominees may prepare
a statement of not more than 100 words stating their qualifications
for the office of Chairman. These statements shall be mailed to the
members of the Joint Boards of Directors with the agenda and other
meeting material for the July regular meeting.
AGENDA ITEM #13 -R-ALL DISTRICTS
. ~
TL own•
¥fssoclates
June 5, 1975 .
Mr. Ray Lewis
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject: Yorba Linda Force Main
Dear Mr. Lewis:
On April 12, 1975, an inspection was made of the existing
24-inch Techite Pipe that was installed under the Orange
Freeway in 1968 prior to the construction of the freeway.
The purpose of this investigation was to determine the
condition of the pipe and whether or not it can be used for
a ·portion of the Yorba Linda Force Main. Plans ·of the in-
stallation are entitled, "Construction Plans, Orange Free-
way Crossings, 2-9-1, Cypress Avenue Relief Sewer and
2-2 Yorba Linda Force Main 11 Drawing No. 2-2P-207C, dated
6-12-68. As-built plans are dated 9-26-68.
District personnel that were present at the inspection
were Bill Clarke, Bruce Witcher, Marshall F~ires, and Bruce
Taylor. Tim Pika of the Techite Pipe Company and Bob
Barletta of the National Clay Pipe Institute were also
present.
·An excavation was made between Stations 16+61 and 16+69.
It.was possible to go down into the excavation and phy-
sically examine the Techite Pipe. A deflectometer was
placed into the pipe approximately 100 feet westerly to
about Station 15+60 and pulled to the excavation at 16+60.
It was obvious from looking at the pipe and from the de-
flectometer readings that the pipe was badly distorted
and deflected, both vertically and horizontally. Dis-
placement at the joints was also evident. The deflecto-
meter was set for a minimum 20-inch diameter reading.
At one point the deflectometer reached the 20-inch
reading and would have gone even lower had the gauge
been able to do so. The.measured 4-inch deflection re-
presents 16% deflection of the 24-i~ch pipe diameter.
AGENDA ITEM #2S(a) S-1
10963 SAN DIEGO MISSION ROAD, SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92108
(714) 281-556?
DISTRICT 2
r •.
Mr. Ray Lewis
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
June 5, 1975
Page Two
This is enough deflection to cause serious structural failing
of the pipe. Based on these observations, in our opinion
the use of this section of Techite Pipe would not be
practical.
In addition to the very poor condition of the Techite pipe,
it is also smaller than required for the ultimate flow.
The new planned force main is 30-inch in size rather than
24-:-inch.
It is therefore reconunended that a new 30-inch ductile iron· pipe
be installed within a jacked 48-inch casing pipe. The esti-
mated cost is:
325 feet of 48-inch casing pipe.with 30-inch force main
325 feet at $300 per foot= $97,500.bO
265 feet at $47 per foot = $12,500.00
TOTAL= $110,000.00
The new 30-inch ductile iron force main will insure maximum
reliability for. the entire installation.
Veiy truly yours,
LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES
DJM:rtk
Staff has reviewed this proposal indepth and concurs in the above recommendation.
AGENDA ITEM #2S(a) S-2 DISTRICT 2
Copy to J·ws for June Agenda v
hown
!lfssoclates
121 Ga~I Wa6~inglon Avmu~, San/a Ana, Cal./ornia. 92701 (714} 541-5301
May 23, 1975
Board of Directors
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2
OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. o. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention: Mr. Ray E. Lewis,
Chief Engineer
Subject: Contract No. 2-16-2
Yorba Linda Force Main
Gentlemen:
As a result of the investigations conducted on the existing
24-inch techite pipe under the Orange Freeway, it has been
concluded that a new force main will be needed to replace
the techite pipe at this location. In accordance with
your request, we are pleased to submit this proposal for
providing ·engineering design services for the preparation
of the plans and specifications for this reach of the
Yorba Linda Force Main.
We will perform the following professional engineering ser-
vices for the project in accordance with the following:
(1) Hold conferences with the District's staff,
other interested agencies, and any private
property owners who may be involved in the
project to arrive at a mutually satisfactory
·alignment for the new force main.
(2) Make arrangements for and coordination of
field surveys, soils investigations and
related work.
(3) Assist in obtaining permits from the
California Division of Highways and any
other affected governmental agencies.
AGENDA ITEM #2S(b) T-1
10963 SAN DIEGO MISSION ROAD, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92108
1714) 281-5567
DISTRICT 2
Board of Directors
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2
OF ORANGE COUNTY
May 2 3 , 19 7 5 .
Page Two
(4) Prepare legal descriptions and maps for any
right-of-way acquisition that may be re-
quired.
(5) Prepare construction plans and specifications
and integrate the project into the remaining
portion of the Yorba Linda Force Main,
Contract 2-16-2, and provide all other en-
gineering services as previously described
for that project in accordance with our
proposal dated July 31, 1973.
We propose to provide the above services for a basic fee of
$4,200, and further propose that payment of the design fees
be monthly on a percentage-completed basis up to 90% at the
time of delivery of the plans and specif1cations, and 100%
payrne~t when the work is completed and accepted by the
District.
All other work such as field surveys for construction
staking, .soils investigations, and any other outside ser-
vices required and approved by the District staff, will
be in accordance with our original proposal dated July 31,
1973, for the other portion of the Yorba Linda Force Main
and as amended by our letter dated September 13, 1973, in
regard to survey rates.
If authorization is given to proceed at the June Board Meeting,
the plans for the entire Yorba Linda Force Main project can
be completed for the Board Meeting in July.
Very truly yours,
LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES
/(eL,cc/ J};aiL/,:1r.--
DONALD /~RTINSON
DJM:rtk
AGENDA ITEM #2S(b) T-2 DISTRICT 2
. .
VALUATION CONSULTANTS• REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS
bmiw@S
S E. GOODE. SR. MAI (1888 • 1972>
S £. COOD[. JR , MAI
G E. SCHMITZ. MAI
County Sanitation Districts.
of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
108·44 Ellis Avenue
·Fountain Valley, CA 92708
June 5. 1975
Attention: Mr. Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
HE: Trunk Sewer Easements/County Sanitation District No. 7. Job No. 7-6-7
Proposed S~ttlement -Appraisal Recommendation
Gentlemen:
At your request, we have reviewed your letter of May 29, 1975 addressed to
Southern Pacific Transportation Company, outlining the basis of the proposed
right-of-way settlement.
The purpose of our review has been to formulate a recommendation concerning
this settlement proposal, after careful consideration of the nature of the ease-:-
ment sought, the property affected, and the alternatives available.
Accurate judgment as to the adequacy of the terms of settlement outlined must
take into con side ra ti.on the following factors:
1. The railroad property is classified as operational, thus precluding
right of entry through an order of immediate possessiono A long
delay may occur before a right of entry could be obtained through
the complex legal channels necessary in this situationo
2. The alternate route available utilizing Holt Avenue would eliminate
right-of-way costs and delays, but dollar savings would be eliminated
and costs would be increased in the overall due to the added length of
the right-of-way, and construction costs connected therewith. (See
.Boyle Engineering Company Preliminary Engineering Report, page 17.)
3. The sums called for as permanent right-of-way acquisition costs and
rent for temporary right-of-way·construction purposes are reasonable,
and under ·the circumstances favorable to the District's position.
AGENDA ITEM #28 (a) U-1 DISTRICT 7
1840 L Seventeenth SIH•ct •Suite 130, Santa Ana. Calif~miia 9270 l •Telephone (·714) 835-G.78·1
. -. , I
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
Page 2
June 5. 1975
In the absence of our completed appraisal, we are not prepared to state a
specific market value for the easement areas. It is clear, however, from the
information that we have developec;l to date, that these amounts set forth in
your letter are re.asonable.
We therefore recommend. that the District proceed with the settlement as
proposed in your May 29, 1975 letter to the Southern Pacific Transportation
Company.
Sincerely,
·--I/ 1 7 ·;),/. ·, /.; /'
Stanley Eo Goode, Jr., MAI-CHE
sf
AGENDA ITEM #28(a) U-2 DISTRICT 7
,.
" '
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
TELEPHONES:
ARC:A CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
P. O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
Mr. J • F. Mc A 11 i st er
Ass)stant Division Engineer
·Southern Pacific Transp~rtation Company
610 South Main Street
Los Angeles, California 90014
May 29, 1975
Attention: Hr.· R. L. Stacy, Assistant to District Manager
Subject: Permanent and Temporary Trunk Sewer Easements for County
Sanitation District No. 7 -Job No. ·7-6-7
Pursuant to our recent meeting concerning the desires of County Sanitation
District No. 7 to acquire 1.3546 acres of permanent easements for a portion of
the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer and the temporary use of a portion of the
Southern Pacific right-of-way in the unincorporated territory of the County of
.Orange from Irvine Boulevard to a point southerly of Fairhaven Avenue as shown
on the attached maps, on behalf of the Sanitation District I would like to
propose the following:
1. That the Southern Pacific Land Company dedicate to the County
Sanitation District No. 7, 1.3546 acres of permanent easement
for the construction, operation and maintenance of that portion
of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer designated as Job No. 7-6-7 in
the lump sum amount of $40,000.
2. That the Sanitation District and the Southern Pacific Company·
enter into a rental agieement wherein the District would pay to
the Southern Pacific the sum of $300 per acre per month for that
portion of the temporary easement used by the District's contractor
during the construction period. Said rental would only be
applicable during that period of time and for the particular area
required by the contractor.
3. That the Sanitation District, with the cooperation of your office,
obtain necessary approvals from the San Diego Pipeline Company for
the construction of said trunk sewer.
If these conditions meet with your approval, this office in conjunction with
the District's appraiser, will recommend this to the District's Board of
AGENDA ITEM #28(b) V-1 DISTRICT 7
' .
, ,
Mr. J. F. McAllister
Southern Pacific Transportation Company
May 29, 1975
Page Two
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVlNU[
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(71.C) 962-2411
Directors at their regular Board Meeting of June 11th. It is hoped that this
can be agreed upon on or before July 1, 1975 in order th~t the District's
contractor can proceed with the execution of the work as outlined. in the
contract for the above-mentioned job.
REL: hj e
cc: Thomas ·L. Woodruff
AGENDA ITEM #28(b) V-2 DISTRICT 7
... " -~
June 5, 1975
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFO RN IA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108H ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(7 14) 962-2411
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON INDU STRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE
Meeting Date: June 4, 1975
Members present: Henry Duke, Chairman, John Burton, Michael
Callahan, Dale Chaput , Howard Rogers
Members absent: Bernie Svalstad
Others pres~nt: Frank Ellwell, Surplate; Walker Downs, Anodyne;
B~ll Snyder, Embee Plating
Staff present: Fred A. Harper, Ray E. Lewis, John Thomas,
Hilary Eitzen
Convened:
Adjourned:
7:30 p.m.
9:30 p .m.
****************
General Review by Staff -The staff -briefly reviewed the
development of the existing and proposed ordinances with special
emphasis on the manner in which the existing excess ·capacity
charge provisions of both ordinances were developed. In addition ,
the Committee was apprised of the requirements of the Federal Water
Pollution Contrbl Act , known as Publ i c Law 92-500. The excess
capacity charge provisions of the current ordinance is not accept -
able to the State and EPA as far as a revenue pro gram is concerned.
The underlying philosophy in Public Law 92 -500 is to create equity
whereby the user pays in accordance with his use of the sewer system .
This applies to operation and maintenance costs as well as capital
recovery. The staff presented the following figures which have
b een averaged for all Districts :
Current costs per million gallons (average all 7 Districts):
0 & M
Capital Recov.
$ 66.00
204.00
$270.00
These figures do not include d~bt retirement which will con-
tinue to be amo·rtized by ad valorem taxes.
Alternatives Considered by the Committee -Six alternatives
for capital recovery were presented by the staff to the Corruni ttee.
(1) Districts continue to utilize ad valorem taxes as
the major source of revenue, but collect for
excessive use by the current formula for excess
capacity using peak flow based on 1971 figu res -
$350/1000 gallons peak flow ·
(2) Districts continue to utilize ad valorem taxes
as the major source of revenue, but collect for
excessive use by the formula for excess capac ity
using average flow based on 1971 figures -$350/1 000
gallons average flow ·
(3) Districts continue to utilize ad valorem taxes
as the major source of revenue, but ·collect for
excessive use by the formula ~or exc~ss capacity
using peak flow based on 1974 figures -$556 per
thousand gallons of peak flow
(4) Districts continue to utilize ad valorem·taxes
.as the major source of revenue; but co l lect for
excessive use by the formula for excess capacity
using average flow based on 1974 figur es -$556
per thousand gallons
(5) A modified user charge employing a revenue program
which continues· to utilize a d valo rem taxes as the
major source of r e v e nue but co ll ects main t enance
and operation costs plus a capital recovery charge
from dischargers exceeding 2 .5 million g~llons per
year with credits for ad valorem ta ~es paid the
District s
(6) Eliminate ad valorem taxes as the major re venue
source a nd charge each sewer user an annua l charge
based on the costs for ga llonage discharged regard-
less of classification, i.e., ~esidential, corrunercial,
or industrial.
Advantages and Disadvantages of the Various Alternatives:
Alternativ es 1 through 4 essentially support the current and
proposed method of collecting a one-t i me excess capacity charge
and provide s ubsidie s for firms discharging prior to 1971 .
In addition to the one-time charges developed by the excess
capacity formulas, the .Di strict would continue to collect opera-
tions ~nd maintenance costs which are currently projected to be
$66/million gallons.
-2-
--. ~
The advantage to the user is that it is a one-time charge
for excess capacity as long as his flows do not increaie. If
the user was in operation prior to 1971, he may not be. charged
for excessive use of the sewer system.
The disadvantages are that many users are being subsidized
by other tax~ayers. For those users who haVe established ~
high capacity right ~ithout payment there is no incentive for
water conservation.
Alternative No. 5 -The modified user charge would employ a fixed annual capital charge per million gallons of $125 for
capital· recovery, plus the gallonage charge for operations and
maintenance (0 & M), which will vary annually. The current
projection is $66 per million gallons for 0 & M. This charge
will apply to all dischargers exceeding 2~ million gallons per
year with credits to be applied for ad valorem taxes paid related
to District 0 &· M and capital recovery. This system of charging
approaches the State and Federal approved revenu~ program if ad
valorem taxes are permitted as the major source of reve n ue.
There is a semblance of equity, in that all dischargers exceed -
ing 2~ million gallons per year will pay 'for their excessive
use of the sewer system. ·
Tho se businesses and/or industries current ly immune to
charges because of the grandfather clause in the current
ordinance will have to pay in accordance with t heir use of
the sewer system. Business and industry will be partially
subsidized by establishing the fixed $1 25/million g a l l o n s fo r
capital recovery over an extended period of t ime . The charge s
will promote water conservation and encourage quant i t y and
quality control by dischargers .
Alternative No . 6 -User charge where everyone is charged
based on the costs for the gallons discharged, r e gard le ss o f
classification, resid e ntial, commercial, or i n dus t rial .. Th is
type of charge system would eliminate ad valorem taxes as the
major revenue source. The advantage of this type of p r o gr am
. is that the user would pay costs in relations h ip to actual u se .
This program is endorsed by the State and Federal Governme nts .
The disadvantages are that we have approximately 350,000
sewer connections within our Districts and the cos t s to administer
such a program would exceed half a million dollars per year, with
no particular benefit relative to water quality. We do no t have
any estimate as to what the costs would be to s et up such a billing
system. It would also shift costs to many disad v antag ed persons;
property owners with low ass e ssed valuations would pay sub stantially
more than they are paying now. The low volum e dischar g er would p a y .
-3-
less. We would anticipate a high' delinquency in collections
and a long period of adjustment, both for the Districts and
the public.
Committee Recommendation -Following a discussion concerning
the vari ous alternatives and the advantages and disadvantages of
the various proposals, the comm ittee members ·present unanimously
agreed that the modified user charge, Alternate No. 5, should
be explored with the industrial community, as it appears to pro-
vide substantial equity among users as well as promote water
conservation. In addition, this method should generate, in the
long run, sizeable funds for capital improvem~nts, operations ,
and maintenance thereby reducing other tax.payers' c.os·ts.
Therefore, the Committee recommends that the Boards of ·
Direct ors authdrize the Districts! staff to hold informal hear ings
with the Chambers of Commerce and r epresentatives of the industrial
community within the Districts for their input and reaction to a
modifi ed user charge r evenue program which continues to utilize
ad valorem taxes as the major source of revenue but collects
maintenance and operation costs plus a fixed capital recovery .
charge of $125 per million gallons from dischargers exceeding
2~ million gallons per year ·with applied credits for ad valorem
taxes paid the District.
-4-
.
EXCESS CAPACITY CHARGES
ALT. #1 ALT. #2
Using Peak Flow Using Ave. Flow
ComEan;y: and 1970 Rates and 1970 Rates
$350/1000 gals. $350/1000 gals.
A $14,470 : $ 8,995
B $85,750 $53,550
c $10,815 $ 1,610
In addition, the Districts will continue to collect
operations and maintenance costs which are currently
projected to be $66 per million gallons.
ALT.#3
Using Peak Flow
and 1974 Rates
$556/100 gals.
$ 23,485
~136,347
$ 17, 197
ALT. #4 ALT. #5
Using Ave. Flow Capital Recovery $125/mg
and 1974 Rates (Annual Charge)
$556/1000 gals
$14,303 $ 1,569/yr. ' .
$85,148 $_29,470/yr.
$ 2,560 $11,793/yr.
I_ •
. .
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
June 9, 1975
Mr. Gordon Wood
Committee on Public Works
and Transportation
House of Representatives
2165 Rayburn Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515 .
Dear Gordon:
. .
Thank you for· your call this morning relative to some
Committee hearings late this month or in July, concerning
possible amendments of compliance dates in PL 92-500.
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
For your information, I am enclosing a proposed definition
·or best practicable waste treatment for publicty-owned
treatment works discharging into territorial seas which our
agency submitted to EPA's Task Force on Secondary Treatment
of Municipal Ocean Discharges in June, 1974. You will note
that the definition does not address ~tself to EPA's BOD
requirements, as oxygen depletion is not a concern for ocean
discharges. The emphasis is on potential toxic substances,
suspended solids, turbidity, grease, ~nd oil. ·
I am'also enclosing a report entitled "Alternatives for
Improved Treatment", which compares the costs of conventional
secondary treatment for our agency, $275.8 million vs. $113.8
million to meet the criteria established in our proposed
definition of best practicable waste treatment (BPT). It is
our contention that discharges through deep ocean outfalls
meeting our definition of BPT have no serious adverse effects
on the marine enviro~ment and, in many instances; will have
beneficial effects by increasing the nutrient levels around
the outfalls to a degree comparable to th~ naturally-occurring
levels achieved through upwelling.
I have asked Willard Bascom, Director of the Southern California
AGENDA ITEM No. 6-(B)
-...
Mr. Gordon Wood
June 9, 1975
Page 2
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71"> s .. 0-2910
(71 .. ) 962-2-411
Coastal Water Research Project to comment on the limita-
tions we have set forth in our proposed definition of BPT.
FAH:j
Enclosures
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
Mr. Willard Bascom, Director, SCCWRP, w/BPT Booklet
Mr. Lee C. ·White, Legal Counsel, AMSA
COPIES TO COMMITTEE MEMBERS ONLY.
~ REPORT OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON I.NDUSTRIAL
WASTE ORDINANCE.
THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE WAS ·
INCLUDED IN THE AGENDA MATERIAL WHICH WAS MAILED JUNE 5TH. BRIEFLY)
THE COMMITTEE CONSIDERED 6 ALTERNATIVES FOR CAPITAL RECOVERY AND
DISCUSSED THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE VARIOUS ALTER-
NATIVES.
WE HAVE ENCLOSED IN YOUR FO~DERS TONIGHT A BREAKDOWN OF THE
EXCESS CAPACITY CHARGES FOR THREE COMPANIES) BASED ON 5 OF THE 6
ALTERNATIVES PRESENTED. You WILL NOTE THAT A~TERNATIVES 1 THROUGH
4) WHICH ARE ONE-TIME CHARGES) VARY GREATLY DEPENDING ON THE BASIC
CRITERIA USED FOR EACH CALCULATION. ALTERNATIVE 5· IS BASED ON THE
ACTUAL FLOW USE OF THE SEWER SYSTEM BY .EACH OF THE COMPANIES. THE
ANNUAL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE COSTS WHICH ARE CURRENTLY BUDGETED
TO BE $66 PER MILlION GALLONS WOULD BE ADDED IN EACH CASE. THE
COMMITTEE REALIZES THAT MANY FIRMS WHICH PRESENTLY ARE NOT SUBJECT
TO ANY CAPITAL CHARGES OTHER THAN WHAT THEY PAY THROUGH AD VALOREM
TAXES WILL NOW PAY ANNUAL CAPITAL RECOVERY CHARGES IF ALTERNATIVE
5 IS ADOPTED BY THE BOARDS. CURRENTLY) OTHER TAXPAYERS ARE SUB-
SIDIZING THEIR USE OF THE SEWER SYSTEM. ESSENTIALLY) WE ARE LOOKING
AT A CHARGE OF APPROXIMATELY $200 PER MILLION GALLONS) WHICH INCLUDES
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLUS A FIXED CAPITAL RECOVERY CHARGE OF
$125 PER MILLION GALLONS FOR ANY DISCHARGES EXCEEDING 2~ MILLION
GALLONS PER YEAR. EACH DISCHARGER WILL RECEIVE CREDIT FOR AD
VALOREM TAXES PAID THE DISTRICT.
FoR THE PAST TWO YEARSJ THE Los ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS HAVE CHARGED $230 PER MILLION GALLONS FOR THE AVERAGE
INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGE.
THE STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT THE $200 PER MILLION GALLON
CHARGE WILL BE BROKEN DOWN: 70% FOR FLOWJ· 20% FOR SUSPENDED SOLIDSj
AND 10% FOR BODJ SO THATJ DEPENDING ON THE TYPE OF DISCHARGEJ EACH
INDUSTRY'S COSTS WILL VARY DEPENDING ON WHAT THEY PUT IN THE SEWER.
WE BELIEVE THAT THIS APPROACH WILL PROVIDE SUBSTANTIAL EQUITY AMONG
USERS;. IT WILL PROMOTE WATER CONSERVATIONJ AND WE BELIEVE IT WILL
GO A LONG WAY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SOURCE-CONTROL PROVISIONS
OF THE ORDINANCEJ IN THATJ THE DISCHARGER WILL BE EXTREMELY COGNIZANT
OF. WHAT GOES IN THE SEWER BECAUSE IT WILL COST HIM MONEY,
THE COMMiTTEE RECOMMENDS THAT THE BOARDS AUTHORIZE THE STAFF ·
TO HOLD .INFORMAL HEARINGS WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CHAMBERS OF
COMMERCE AND THE INDUSTRIAL COMMUN I TY FOR THE I.R INPUT AND REACT I ON
TO A MODIFIED USER CHARGE REVENUE SYSTEM AS RECOMMENDED IN THE
COMMITTEE'S JUNE 5TH REPORT.
1
2
3
AGREEMENT ---------FOR SALE OF DIGESTED SEWAGE SOLIDS
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this ---day of
4 , 1975, by and between COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1,
5 OF ORANGE COUNTY as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos.
6 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County and on its own behalf,
7 hereinafter referred to as "District", and JEANNE L. EDDOWS, an
8 individual, dba ALART COMPANY, hereinafter called "Company";
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
·28
WITNESS E.T H:
WHEREAS, District is organized and existing under and by
virtue of the provisions of the County Sanitation District Act,
Chapter 250, Statutes of 1923, as amend~d (California Health and
Safety Code Section 4700 et seq.), and
WHEREAS, District is a public agency organized for the
purpose, among others, of operating and maintaining sewage treat-
rnent plants for treating and disposing of sewage under and pur-
suant to the provisions of said County. Sanitation District Act,
and
WHEREAS, District has constructed and is operating two inter-
connected sewage treatment plants located in the Cities of
Fountain valley and Huntington Beach, California, hereinafter
calJ.ed "Plant No. 1 11 and "Plant No. 2" respectively, and
WHEREAS, District produces a by-product in its treatment of
the sewage wastewater which consists of digested sewage solids
hereinafter referred to as "sludge", and
WHEREAS, said Company is familiar with commercial uses of
"sludge" and did on December 17, 1974, submit a proposal to
l County Sanitation District No. 1 Board of Directors setting
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
forth a detailed plan for the utilization of all District digest ·
sewage solids produced as a result of the District's wastewater
treatment operations, and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of said Sanitation District
did, at an adjourned meeting on December 19, 1974, acting upon
recommendation from staff, declare its intent to enter into this
agreement for the sale of said digested sewag~ solids to Company
within the conditions contained in said proposal which are
amenable to the Districts' operations, and
WHEREAS, an agreement was made and entered into by and be-
tween District and Company on February 20, 1975, and was sub-
sequently amended by execution of the First Amendment to Agreement
on April 10, 1975, and
WHEREAS, certain disagreements and misunderstandings arose
by and between the parties pertaining to the terms and conditions
of the above-referenced agreement, and
WHEREAS, Districts served a notice of rescission of the above-
referenced agreement on May 6, 1975, which notice of rescission
was ratified by action of the Board of Directors of District on
May 14, 1975, and
WHEREAS, at the request of Company, Districts reconsidered
their action of May 14, 1975, at their regular adjourned meeting
of May 29, 1975, and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of District on May 29, 1975,
26 · authorized an award of a short term agreement with Company for
27
28
purposes of sludge removal and reevaluation, subject to certain
terms and conditions, including the execution of a mutual
-2-
1 cancellation of the agreement of February 20, 1975, as amended
2 on April 10, 1975.
3 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual
4 agreements hereinafter set forth, it is agreed as follows:
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1. In consideration for the execution of this new
agreement and the surrender of any and all rights arising out of
the failure to comply with the terms of said agreement dated
February 20, 1975, as amended April 10, 1975, parties hereto
hereby expressly agree to rescind said previous agreements in
each and every respect and to waive all rights which may accrue
to the respective parties thereunder.
2. The term of this agreement shall be for a period
of ninety (90) days from the date of execution by both parties.
3. Obligations of Districts
A. The Districts shall centrifuge all digested
solids at Plant No. 1. The centrifuged solids shall be placed
in hopper containers by Districts which can be readily loaded
for transport to Plant No. 2 area for processing. There will
be no sewage solids diverted to open air sludge drying beds at
Plant No. 1 as a part of normal operations. On an infrequent
basis, material may be directed to the sludge drying beds at
Plant No. 1 during a digester cleaning operation. Except for
transport of digested sludge from Plant No. 1 to Plant No. 2,
the Districts will not allow the processing of any digested
sludge by Company at Plant No. 1.
B. The Districts anticipate the centrifuging
of approximately 60 to 100 percent of the sludge volume at
Plant No. 2. All material in the sludge drying beds, as well
-3-
l the centrifuge cake, will be made available to Company. The
centrifuge 6ak~ produced will.vary in con~isten~y from approxi-
mately 18 percent solids to 26 percent solids. In the District
operations there may be times when polymer additions may be
used in order to recover more solids from the withdrawals from
the anaerobic digesters.
C. District will make available certain areas
located at Plant No. 2 for sludge drying, handling and processing
9 in a manner determined appropriate by Company and which is
10 acceptable to District. These areas are more particularly
11
1
defined and set forth on a print map of P.lant No. 2, attached
I
12 hereto as Exhibit 11 A 11 and incorporated herein by reference.
4. Obligations of Company
~
I
I
13
14 A. Company shall establish and continuously main-
I
1511
16 II
17
. 18
19
20
21
22
23
I
24 I
I
25 I
26 I
I
tain in operation an approved windrow drying system in the area
noted on Exh:j..bit 11 A" as "North No. 1 11
• The establishment of this
system must be commenced immediately upon execution of the agree-
ment.
B. Company shall establish and continuously main-
tain in operation an approved windrow drying system in the area
noted on Exhibit 11 A11 as "South No. l". The establishment of this 1
I
I
system must be commenced immediately upon execution of the agree-
ment.
Company shall complete the emptying of the 1'
drying bed noted on Exhibit "A" as "Middle No. l" by July 18, 1975.,
c.
D. · Company shall empty the dry~ng beds at Plant I
i
27 I No. 2 shown on Exhibit "A" as · .. Middle No. 2", North No. 1, North I
'-"
28 No. 2, North No. 3 and North No. 4 by September 15, 1975. The
I
-4-
1 emptying of these beds shall be done in the sequence set forth in
2 this paragraph, commencing with Middle No. 2.
3 E. All drying beds which have not had sludge
4 added for thirty .('30) days shall be considered to be in the
5 "process of drying". All such beds in the "process of drying"
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
. 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
·28
shall be 11 walked 11 at least once per week by Company personnel to
assist in the drying operation.
F. Company further agrees to hold District free
and harmless from any and all liabilities, claims, obligations
and costs, including attorney's fees and other costs of defending
suits and claims that may be brought against the District by
reason of Company's operations.
G. Company will provide District with trucking
receipts or tickets for all sludge removed from District's pre-
mises, showing the volume of sludge removed; these receipts shall
be delivered to District on a daily basis.
5. Company agrees to conduct its sludge removal business
in compliance with all applicable governmental rules and regula-
tions and agrees not to create or maintain a nuisance.
6. Company shall not commence any work under this
contract until it has obtained all insurance required in the per-
formance of its responsibilities and in a form acceptable to the
District. Company shall take out and maintain at all times during
the contract the following policies of insurance:
A. Worker's Compensation Insurance -The Company
shall pro~1ide such compensation insurance as required by the Labor
Code of the State of California. The Company shall require all
subcontractors similarly to provide such compensation insurance
-5-
l for all of the latters' employees.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B. Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance
The Company shall carry and maintain insurance coverage for
public liability and property damage on account of bodily injuries,
including. death resulting therefrom, in the sum of not less than
$1,000,000 for one person and $3,000,000 for more than one person,
and property damage in the sum of not less than $500,000 resulting
from any one accident which may arise from the operation of the
Company in the performance of the work that is provided for herein.
C. Motor Vehicle Public Liability and Property
Damage Insurance -The Company shall carry and maintain a motor
vehicle public liability and property damage insurance coverage
on each automobile, truck and other vehicle which is used in the
performance of the contrac~ in an amount of not less than
$200,000 for one person and $500,000 for more than one person and
property damage in the sum of not less than $100,000 resulting
from any one accident which_may arise from the operation of the
Company in·the performance of the work that is provided for here-
in.
7. The District also requires that said insurance
coverage obtained by the Company, excepting Worker's Compensation
coverage, shall name the District and all entities from whom
permits to do the work are required, as additional insureds. The
Company shall furnish a Certificate of Waiver of Subrogation under
the terms of the Worker's Compensation Insurance.
8. Company shall be apprised that it completely under-
stands that it must be responsible to secure all business license8
city of Huntington Beach building permits, pay for any taxes and
·-6-
' ' "'
1 comply with any Federal, State, County and City law or ordinance
2 which may be applicable to the Company's operation. District
3 will be responsible to secure all necessary and applicable Air
4 Pollution Centro~ District's construction and operating permits.
5 Any conditions set forth in any permits secured by District will
6 be a requirement which must be fulfilled by the Company at its
7 expense.
8 9. For all sludge removed from District's premises,
9 the Company shall pay to the District the sum of Fifty Cents
10 ($.50) per cubic yard. Said sums shall be paid within thirty (30)
11 days of removal. To guaranty this payment, Company agrees to
12 provide security in a form approved by General Counsel of the
13 District, prior to the execution o·f this agreement.
· 14 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, JEANNE L. EDDOWS, dba ALART COMPANY, and
15 the Chairman and the Secretary of the District, by Resolu~ion
16 No. of the Board of Directors of said District, there-
17 unto duly authorized, have caused their names to be affixed hereto,
18 each in triplicate, the date and year first above written.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
-28
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
General Counsel
JEANNE L. EDDOWS, an individual
dba ALART COMPANY
Jeanne L. Eddows
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1,
of Orange County, California, a
public corporation
Chairman, Board of Directors
Secretary, Board of Directors
-7-
RESOLUTION NO. 75-96
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 75-17
(POSITIONS AND SALARIES)
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TifE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING POSITIONS AND SALARIES RESOLUTION
NO. 75-17
* * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and
11 of Orange County, California,
Db HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Exhibit "D" of Resolution No. 75-17 is hereby amended to add position
classification thereto, or adjust salary ranges for position classifications thereof, for
the Joint Administrative Organization, as follows:
A. OPERATIONAL PERSONNEL
Approximate
Biweekly Monthly
Range or Equivalent
Classification Position Classification No. Hourly Salary
90300 Assistant to the Chief Engineer 354A 520.00-640.80 1127/1389
80100 Principal Laboratory & Research 353A 494.40-608.80 1071/1319
Analyst
80300 Laboratory Associate 352 464.00-570.40 1005/1235
80200 Senior Laboratory & Research
Analyst 351C 457.60-562.40 992/1219
80400 Laboratory Analyst II 349C 412.80-507.20 895/1099
80600 Laboratory Analyst I 348A 383.20-469.60 831/1018
80700 Laboratory Technician 346C 356.00-434.40 771/942
00000 Helper 4.00/hr. Max.
c. ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL
Approximate
Biweekly Monthly
Range or Equivalent
~assification Position Classification No. Hourly Salary
10250 Assistant to the Chief of Personnel 354A 520.00-640.80 1127/1389
Division
10260 Assistant to the Director of 354A 520.00-640.80 1127 /13B9
Finance
10300 Assistant to the Secretary of 350B 429.60-S27.20 930/1142
the Boards
10240 Administrative Assistant 349C 412.80-507.20 895/1099
10380 Lead Storeskeeper 349C 412.80-507.20 895/1099
D. SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL
10100 Principal Accountant 59C 664.00-827.20 1438/1792
00600 Senior Facilities Supervisor S9C 664.00-827.20 1438/1792
80000 Laboratory Director S9A 646.40-804.80 1400/1743
00000 Facilities Supervisor SBA 611. 20-761. 60 1324/1650
70100 Chief Operator SBA 611. 20-761. 60 1324/1650
Section 2. That Exhibit "D" of Resolution No. 7S-17 is hereby amended by the deletion
therefrom of the following position classification:
D. SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL
BOOOO Laboratory Supervisor 57C 594.40-740.80 1288/160S
Section 3. That Resolution No. 7S-17 is hereby amended by the addition of Exhibit "E"
dated July, 197S; and,
Section 4. That Exhibit "E" dated January, 1975, is hereby rescinded; and,
Section 5. That any other resolution or motion or portions thereof that conflict
herewith are hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and,
Section 6. That this resolution shall become effective July 4, 1975.
-2-
FORCE
ACCT
(
I
EXECUTIVE
COMMITTEE
I
I
DIR OF FINANCE
&
SEC TO BOARDS
36 I <29)
ADl'llN &-FIN#\ru.t. Ut.l"I
PRINCIPAL
PRINCIPAL SENIOR PROC &
ACCOUNTANT ACCOUNTANT PROP CHIEF ASS'T TO
CHIEF OF
PERSONNEL
L
STRUC-
TURES
DIG ES-
TERS GROUNDS
24 (21)
COLL FACL
FACILITIES
SUPERVISOR
I
SEWERS PUMP
STATIONC
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
SU1",M.ARY ORG,;1i I z.:.. TIC ~AL CHART
f'ITCE I
JULY, l~75
(REVISED)
BOARDS
OF
0 I RECTORS
273 (217)
GENERAL
AANAGER
20".l \I :>OJ
:
OPER & LABORATORY DEPT~
19 I 061
LAB & R£SEARCH
SR FACL
SUPV
UPER
ENGINEER
43 (32)
MECH FACL
FACILITIES
SUPERVISOR
I I
SHOP &
Fl XED MOBILE
EQUIP EQUIP
.
FACILITIES
SUPERVISOR
I NSTRU-
HHHS ELECT
CHIEF
OPERATOR
TR1'1T
PLANT
OPER
I
6ACT
LAB
LABORATORY
.DI RECTOR
I I
CHEM I 1 NOUST
LAB I WASTE
LAU
I
CHIEF
ENGINEER
I
MARINE
SPECIAL
COl",f'll TTEES
CHIEF OF
INOUST &
PERMIT
£COLOGY
PERMIT
&
C.OllN
(
EXHIBIT"£"
I GEN'L
COUUSEL
~.ti I (29)
_!li~INEERING DEPT
SENIOR
ENG I NEER
PLANT
CON~TR
MAPS &
HAFTING
SENIOR
ENGlflEER
DIST
COtlSTR
I
RES
MGMT
CLIHLk
.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. DOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVE NU E
FOUNTAIN. VALLEY, CALIFOR NI A 92708
(714) 540-2910
(7 I 4) 962-2411
May 29, 1975
M E M 0 R A N D U M
TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager
FROM: W. N. Clarke, Superintendent
SUBJECT: Utilization of "Helper" Positions Wi thin the
Operating and Maintenance Departments $4 .00/Max .,
Approximately $700/Morith
Projects/Plant Maintenance -Division 20/30
(3) Positions could be utilized f or grounds-
keeping and general plant maintenance
d~ties
Mech~nical -Divisi6n 50
(2) Po~ition s could be utilized fa~ equipment
cleaning
Operations -Division 70
(2) Positions could be.utilized f or assistance
in solids dewatering operation
Laborat ory -Division 80
(1) Position could be utilized for gener_al lab
cleanup and assistance in NPDES work
June 5, 1975
NOTE: Pursuant -to a brief discussion by the Ex ecutive Committee on
May 29th re garding the utilization of "helper " positions within
the Op era tin g and Maintenance Departments, if approved , we will
revi se the organization .chart t o -establish helper positions as
shown abo ve. · 'l1 llis doe s not add a ny ad d itio!}a l p e r so n nel t o
the District~' compleme nt, but will p e rmit the hirin g of new
employees at l ower beginning salaries.
·~
R E P 0 R T S
O·N
C 0 N ST RU CT I 0 N I N. P R 0 G RES S
. A-S 0 F
J u N E l I l 9 7 5
' .
PROGRESS REPORT
TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS
..
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY., CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
P2-20 -POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT PLANT NO. 2 -($158,294)
Job complete.
Pl-16 -46 MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 -($29,876,000)
Project work continues without major problems. Concrete placement is
estimated to be 75% complete.
Blower building main floor slab is now under construction. Walls will
follow.
Aeration basin top decks are presently being cast. This work will
continue for three months.
Secondary clarifier progressing rapidly. Structural work is expecte<l
to be completed by September.
Digester dome work is underway and will continue through the month.
Precast walls in the electrical distribution building are being erected.
Concrete pipe work is progressing slowly
Structural work on this project can be considered ahead of schedule.
Mechanical work is behind.
PW-035 -ADDITIONAL BOILER FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2 -($39,047)
Job is complete.
Progress Report
Treatment Plants
Page Two
TREATMENT PLANT WORK
Total Value Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Total Work During May
DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK
Total Value Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Total Work During May
Total Work Under Design
TOTAL AMOUNT UNDER CONTRACT AND DESIGN
June 5, 1975
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,. CALIFORNIA 9270e
(714) 540-2910 ~
$30,073,342
14,334,043
1,587,094
$22,152,204
12,317,135
1,036,033
10,088,068
(714) 962-2411
$30,073,342
$2.2,152,204
10,088,068
$62,313,614
I '
CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT
MAY, 1975
YORBA LINDA PUMP STATION
CONTRACT NO. 2-15
CONTRACTOR: J. PUTNAM HENCK, A CORPORATIQN
& HENCK PRO, A JOINT VENTURE
CONTRACT PRICE: $671, 146. 00
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(71.C) 962-2411
STARTING DATE: SEPT. 1974
COMPLETION DATE: SEPT. 1975
Contraat is for the aonstruction of a reinforced concrete structure to house wet wells and
pwnps for transferri_ng tributary wastewater through a force main line into the Santa Ana
River, Carbon Canyon Interceptor-relief Trunk Line system for conveyance to Wastewater
Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. This will assist in relieving the presently
.congested ~'filler-Holder Trunk Line and will serve proposed land use development of the
tributariJ area to the year 2010.
The wastewater from this pump 3tation will enter the trunk line system through the junction
of the Carbon Canyon Interceptor, Reach 2 and the Kraemer Boulevard Interceptor lines at
the intersection of Palm Drive and Kraemer ~oulevard in Placentia.
The pwnp station structure is located at the intersection of Yorba Linda. Boulevard and
Associated Road in Fullerton. It is being constructed on what was originally University of
California, Fullerton property at the northern perimeter of the campus. Special arrangements
were m::ide with the University for acquisition of the property.
The ohove-ground portion of the Btructure wi U be a low profile building 85' x 109 ', with
the entrance faced away from Yorba Linda Boulevard. The deepest portion of the structure
will be 35' under the ground~ The District has agreed to landBcape the bui Zding area in
accordance with future compatable use by the University. The University plans to construct
an arboretum in the immediate area at some future date •
. Pump room and lower wet well walls have been completed and forms removed.
Backfill has been placed up to within two fee~ of the motor room floor level.
Inside casting forms for the motor room and the upper portion of the wet
wells have been erected.
The pump room stairway has been cast.
Installation of plastic liner plate in the lower portion of the wet wells
was underway until the project engineer rejected the work as unsatisfactory
due to misalignment of "weep channels". These are cut-in paths designed
to allow accumulated moisture free flow to the bottom of the wet well. The
sub-contractor last worked on the job on May 29th. No word has been received
~f his intentions since that time.
~ .
Pacific Telephone has completed installation of telemetering wiring for the
pump station.
·coNSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT
MAY,. 1975
Courhv SANITATION D1sTRICT$
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
KRAEMER BOULEVARD INTERCEPTOR SEWER
CONTRACT NO. 2-16-1
(714) 962-2411
CONTRACTOR: GEORGE MILLER CONSTRUCTION CO. STARTING DATE: JUNE 1975
CONTRACT PRICE: $570~586.80 COMPLETION DATE: MID OCT. 1975
Contraet is for instaUation of 23" vitrified eZay pipe (V.C.P.) along Kraemeri BouZevarid
from Palm Drive in Plaeentia to Imperial Highway in Brea, an apprioximate distanee of 1.5
miles.
This projeet is part of the Santa Ana River, Carbon Canyon Intereeptor-relief system,
designed, in part, to divert flows from the north portion of ·Distriet 2, relieving the
presently eongested Newhope-Plaeentia trunk Zine to Wastewater Reelamation Plant No. 1
in Fountain Valley. The southerly terminus of the interieeptor-reZief system is at the
diversion striueture at Plant No. 1.
The Santa Ana River Intereeptor, Reaeh 1. (eontraets 2-14-1 and 2-14-2) begins at this
point, and is eompleted to the intersection of G1-;ove Street and La Palma Avenue in
Anaheim. This seetion was eonstrueted during the period from Noverriberi 19?2 to January
1975.
The Caribon Canyon Intereeptor (Contraet 2-18) eonneets at this point, lies along La
Palma· Avenue, west to Milleri Street, wherie it turns north to Crowther Avenue, then
west approximately 400·f~et where it terminates.
The Carbon Canyon Intereeptor, Reaehes 1 and 2 (eontraets 2-17-1 and 2-17-2) pieks up
at this point and traverises the Alta Vista Golf Course to Palm Av~nue, triavels west
on Palm Avenue to Kraemer Boulevard where it eonneets to the Kraemer Boulevarid Interi-
eeptor. Contracts 2-18, 2-17-1 and 2-17-2 are under eonstruetion; see·eonstruetion
progriess reporits.
·The Kraemer Boulevard Interieeptor portion of the i~terieeptor-rielief system is designed
to handle flo1.Js up to 25 miUion gallons per day and will" serve the prioposed Zand use
development in the triibutary area to the year 2010.
Excavation has begun on Kraemer Avenue. No pipe has been installed.
contractor estimates pipe laying will begin about June 1st.
Traffic will be diverted to one lane each, north and south on the east
.side of Kraemer Boulevard between Palm Drive and Bastanchury Road for
approximately two months.
The
CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT
MAY,. 1975
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
108"4"4 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
CARBON CANYON-PALM DRIVE INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH 1
CONTRACT NO, 2-17-1
CONTRACTOR: BEBEK COMPANY
CONTRACT PRICE: $733,147.00
STARTING DATE: DEC. 1974
COMPLETION DATE: JUNE 1975
Contract is for installation of 39" diameter vitrified clay pipe (V.C.P.) from Crowther
Avenue, 400· feet from its intersection with Miller Street in Anaheim north through
generally undeveloped Zand containing low brush coverage, oil fields and orchards to Alta
Vista Avenue.. The line then goes under Alta Vista Avenue and traverses the Alta Vista
Golf Course to Palm Drive in Placentia, at the intersection of Warren Street. The job
length is approximately 1.2 miles.
Contract 2-17-1 is part of the Santa Ana River,· Carbo~ Canyon Interceptor-relief system,
designed, in part, to divert flows from the north portion of District 2, relieving the
presently congested Newhope-Placentia trunk line to h'astewater Reclamation Plant No. 1 in
Fountain Valley. · The southerly terminus of the inter•ceptor-relief system is at the
diversion structu:rie at Plant No. 1.
The Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reach 1 (contracts 2-14-1 and 2-14-2) begins at this point,
and is completed to the intersection of Grove Street a~d La Palma Avenue in Anaheim. This
·section was completed during the period from November 1972 to January 1975. From that
point, contract 2-18 is under construction west on La Palma Avenue to Miller Street, where
it turns north to Crowther Avenue, then west 400 feet where it joins this project.
On its northern terminus, this contract joins Contract 2-17-2, the Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive
Interceptor, Reach 2 which travels west on Palm Drive to Y..raemer Boulevard whe~e it joins
Contract 2-16-1, the Kraemer Boulevard Interceptor Sewer. This interceptor line goes
north on Kraemer Boulevard to Imperial Highway in Brea. Contracts 2-18, 2-17-2 and 2~16-1
are under construction. (See progress reports.)
This portion of the interceptor-relief system is designed to handle flows up to 37. 5 mf llion
gallons per day, and will in. part serve proposed Zand use development in the northern
District 2 tributary area to the year 2010.
Pipe installation from Alta Vista Avenue to Palm Drive has been completed
apd backfilled. Clean-up is in progress on the Alta Vista Golf Course, and
the contractor has made arrangements with the course management to replant
turf where necessary.
Excavation and shoring operations are underway for a tunnel under the Santa
Fe Railway tracks north of Crowther Avenue at the southerly terminus of the
~ontract. Tunneling -and pipe installation into the tunnel is anticipated to
oe completed in about three weeks.
Pipe laying is in progress _from Alta Vista Avenue south.
> c
4 c c • • c •
0
~ _..,
-~1 . NM'l ,~~Q3'J w ... 4
... 0 0 .. Ir -· '"' u . ~
~3~VH
H!>no~oexo~
•••••••••
(
p,ROA:JS'EO PAl.M ORIV£.
INTEl<CEPTO/Z
/ .• IJ ,,,,., ,., . (-J.r
\.• ~ f I It ·. ·
':,r' :·.-·,
I
'1 • flft",.··
.,.. ..,
~
r fi: '.Y('' :° -·. _f..Jn I~;-:
, '
.J
ac.F.c.a ~lw
··r-• · / I
1
,'._,'/'I:.(' II ii rrt:. t.~,(' -.. ~'/
_.,
.!
f -, / ,-., .J
(
CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT
MAY'· 1975
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71.C) 540-2910
(71.C) 962-2411
CARBON CANYON INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH 2
CONTRACT NO, 2-17-2
CONTRACTOR: MARK DAKOVICH~ INCORPORATED
CONTRACT PRICE: $539,462.00
STARTING DATE: DEC. 1974
COMPLETION DATE: JUNE 1975
Contract is for the installation of 39" Vitrified CZay Pipe (V. C. P.) from the intersection
of Palm Drive and Warren Street in Placentia, west on Palm Drive to Kr.aemer Boulevard, a
distance of approxim~tely one mile.
Contract 2-17-2 is pa:rit of the Santa Ana River , Carbon Canyon Interceptor-relief system,
designed, in part, to divert flows from the north portion of District 2, relieving the
·presently congested Newhope-Placentia trunk line to Wastewater Reclamation Plant No. 1 in
Fountain Valley. The southerly terminus of the interceptor-relief system is at the
diversion structure at Plant No. 1. ·
The Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reach 1 (contracts 2-14-1 and 2-14-2) begins at this point,
and is completed to the intersection of Grove Street and La Palma Avenue in Anaheim~ This
section was constructed dur-ing the period from Noven'iber 1972 to Januar-y 1975.
From tha.t point, Contract 2-18 is under construction west on La Palma Avenue to Miller Street,
where it turns north to Crowther Avenue, then west 400 feet where it joins Contract 2-17-1.
Contract 2-17-1, Reach 1 of the Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer, turns north at
this point, crosses a section of generally undeveloped Zand containing low brush, oil fields
and orchards to Aita Vista. Avenue, then continues north across the Alta i'ista Golf Coia:ise
to Palm Avenue and Warren Street where it joins on to this project.
On its northern terminus, this contract connects to Contract 2-16-1, the Kraemer Boulevard
Interceptor Sewer, which travels north on Kraemer Boulevard to Imperial Highway in B11 ea.
Contracts 2-18, 2-17-1 and 2-16-·1 are under construction. (See progress 21 eports.)
.This portion of the interceptor-rel.ief system is des1:gned to handle flou.'s up to. 37. 5 mi Zlion
gallons per day, and UJiZZ in part serve proposed Zand use development in the northe11 n
·District tributary area to the year 2010.
Pipe installation is to within 600 feet of completion, to a point just west of
Angelina Drive. Backfill and compaction have been completed to a short
distance behind the pipe heading. First-course paving has been installed to
within 20 feet of the intersection of Angelina Drive and Palm Drive. Final
paving will be installed after allowing the ground to settle.
Palm Drive, between Angelina Drive and Yorba Linda Boulevard, a section
~p~oximately 150 feet long, has been clbsed to traffic and vehicles rerouted
~outh on Angelina Drive. This condi.tion is expected to exist for about three
weeks, allowing the contractor greater access to the job site while traversing
the traffic islands at the intersec.tion of. Palm Drive and Yorba Linda Boulevard ..
Clean-up is progressing on the completed portion of the contract.
---.. ·-·--·--·--~----··--··-·---"·---------....... -.. -
, / ·, /
I . /:-/ .. ·;
AV·
...
••••• I ' I -I ,,,.. ;_. Io be .... or:: ,,,, J ,_ · ·. · -1
J . '/ /' ,.._~// .
·'I I Ir !" ·.• ,:, 7 pipe.
I , ; .. / I . ·:i . [t .; . I II '7 4
·:; ·· . -''~:Vi 4.~:·,z
( (
CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT
MAY, 1975
CARBON CANYON INTERCEPTOR SEWER
CONTRACT NO. 2-18
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O.BOX8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
CONTRACTOR: S. S. ZARUBICA STARTING DATE: JUNE 1974
CONTRACT PRICE: $1,472,160.42 COMPLETION DATE: JUNE 1975
Contract is for installation of reinforced concrete pipe (R.C.P.) from 66" diameter
at the beginning of the project to 39" at.its completion. The contract begins at the
intersection of Grove Street and La Palma Avenue in Anaheim, travels along La Palma
Avenue west to Miller Street where it turns north to Crowther Avenue, then west to a
point 400'feet from the intersection where it terminates, .a distance of approximately
1.4 miles.
Contract 2-18 is part of the Santa Ana River, Carbon Canyon Interceptor-relief system,
designed, in part, to divert flows from the north portion of District 2, relieving the
presently congested Newhope-Placentia trunk line to Wastewater·Reclamation Plant No. 1
in Fountain Valley. The southerly terminus of the interceptor-relief system is at the
diversion structure at Plant No. 1.
The Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reach 1 (contracts 2-14-1 and 2-14-2) begins at thi·s
point, and is completed to the beginning point of this project. This section was
constructed during the period from November 1972 to· JanuariJ 1975.
The.· Cca>bon Canyon Interceptor u.,izl connect into the Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive InteNJeptor,
Reaches 1 and 2 (contracts 2-17-1 and 2-17-2) and the KPaemer Boulevard Inte11ceptor
Sewer (contract 2-16-1) to 'the north. These three projects are now under construction.
(See progress reports.) ·
Thi~ portion of the interceptor-relief system is designed to handle flows up to 42
mil Zion ga lions per day and wi U in part serve proposed Zand use deve Zopmen t in the
northern District 2 tributary ca>ea to the yeca> 2010.
Pipe laying has been completed. All paving has been completed. Traffic
striping h~s been installed and vehicular travel restored to normal.
The contractor is completing installation of plastic liner plate in all
pipe and manholes and cleaning sand from the pipe on La Palma Avenue
that infiltrated when a water line broke during a rainstorm.
Construction of a manhole designed for hook-in of the Atwood sub-trunk at
Miller Street and Miraloma Avenue has b~en completed. The sub-trunk will
be connected when the project is completed. The final" manhole structure
at the end of the project is completed and ready to connect to contract
2-17-1.
The contractor estimates completion of all work by the end of Jun~, 1975.
COMPLETE
••••• I. TO BE CONSTRUCTED
(
CARBON CANYON INTERCEPTOR SEWER
LA PALMA AVEtJUE TO CROl..JTHER AVENUE
CONTqACT NO. 2-13
1.3 ~ILES OF 66 11 & 39" PtPE
CONTRACT AWARDED JUNE 27, 1974
COST: $1,472,160 SC~fDULED fOR COMPLETION FEBRUARY, 1975
(
CONSTRUCTION'PROGRESS REPORT
MAY, 1975
KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACH 4
CONTRACT NO. 3-18
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71'4) 5'40-2910
(71'4) 962-2411
CONTRACTOR: A. G. TUTOR CO., INC. AND
N. M. SALIBA CO., A JOINT
VENTURE
STARTING DATE: SEPT. 1973
CONTRACT PRICE: $4,334,412.00 COMPLETION DATE: AUG. 1975
Contraat is for instaUation of approximately 2. 7 miles of 96" Reinforced Concitete Pipe
{R. C.P. J from the intersection of Newland Street and Bolsa Avenue in County territory, west
on Bolsa Avenue. to Hoover Street in Westminster, north on Hoover Street to Main Street
where it turns west to Golden:west Street, then north to Westminster Avenue. From this
interseation, the contract continues west on Westminster Avenue with the installation of
approximately . 5 mile of 63" R. C.P. to EdJ.j)ards Street.· An 'additional 200 feet of 63" R.C.P.
reaches from the interseation of Golden:west Street and Westminster Avenue north on
Goldenwest Street. to where it joins with Contract 3-20~1.
A siphon structure is to be constriucted at Westminster Avenue and Edwards St~eet to connect
this project into the Westminster Avenue Interceptor Sewer (contract 3-14).
This project is a portion of the Knott Interceptor relief system designed to intercept flows
·from the northwest and west portions of District 3, relieving the presently aongested
MiZler-HoZder Trunk Line to Wastel.Jater Treatment Plant No. 2.in Huntington Beach. The
BoutherZy terminus of the system is at the intersection of Brookhurst Street and. Ellis
Avenue in Fountain Valley. It.will eventually extend to Imperial.Avenue in La Habra.
Contract 3-17 started at the south end in July 1972 and extended to Newland Street and
Bolsa Avenue in County territory where it joined this contract. This section was comp?~eted
in March 19 74. ·
The Westminster Avenue Interceptor Sewer which connects. to this system at Westminster
Avenue and Edzvards Street was completed in JanuarnJ 1971. Flows from the west portion 9f
Dis~rict 3 through this facility are now triibutary to the MiZZer-Holde1,, Trunk Line.
This portion of the Interceptor relief system is designed to handle flows of up to 105 .
mil Zion gallons per day and wi ZZ serve proposed Zand use development of the tributary area
to the year 2010.
All pipe has been installed. The major pipeline junction structure at Golden-
west Street and Westminater Avenue is completed and finishing operations are
in progress. Traffic on Goldenwest Street .south of the intersection is still
limited to one lane each way. This is expected to continue until the last
·eek in June. Left turns have been restored at the intersection . ..,,,,,,, .
Pipe cleaning and installation of plastic pipe liner is underway and expected
to pe completed in approximately three weeks.
CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT (CONTINUED)
MAY, 1975
KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACH 4
CONTRACT NO. 3-18
PAGE TWO
Excavation and shoring are underway at the intersection of Westminster·
Avenue and Hoover Street for installation of the siphon structure connecting
into the Westminster Avenue Interceptor Sewer.
The contractor estimates completion of all work and return of normal traffic
flow by the end of June.
J -----·-
COMt=='l f 1f
~ lo 6r CO N ST teUC.i~D
0
0
0 > Ill
§
D
HA'Z 0 A ~
W\'.""5TM lN S TC"I<:
M f MOk:I AI..
COUNiY
OF
O l<.AN6e-
PAl<K
0
'rn l
' L f6~N D
~ KNOTT !Nifl<CC'PiO~
3 Mt Lf '5 o F «:?)~" ?l f'f
CON i t:Z l~CT AWArl..D,f°D ! <D-1-'"7?
C0 '5j; $ 4/~'?"l , ""1-Z.
$CHfOUL;;'"O !=OR COM F'Le'"i lON: 9 -l· 7~ .
CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT
MAY, 1975
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
108-44 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71.C) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
IMPERIAL RELIEF INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 22 & 23
CONTRACT NO, 3-19
CONTRACTOR: MIKE PRLICH & SONS STARTING DATE: AUG. 1974
CONTRACT PRICE: $832,372.00 COMPLETION DATE: SEPT. 1975
Contract is for the instailation of a 2. 75 mile Vit1 1 ified Clay Pipe (V. C.P. J interceptor
sewer-along Imperial Highway from Beach Boulevard to a point 1300 feet past Palm Street
in La Habra. The line consists of 1300 feet of 24", 4800 feet of 21 ", and 8400 feet of
18" pipe ..
This project is a portion of the Knott Interceptor relief system designed to intercept
flows from the northwest and west portions of District 3, re lieveing the presently
congested Miller-Holder Trunk Line to ·Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington
Beach. The southerly terminus of the system is at the intersection of Brookhurst
Street and Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley. This portion of the system is the final
section of the northern end.
Until interconnecting links of the system are completed, this section will drain into
the MiUer-Holder·Trunk Line upon its completion. .It is designed to handle flows of
up to 9.4 million gallons per day and will serve proposed Zand use development of the
extreme ~orthern portion of District 3 to the year 2010.
Pipe installation is completed. Final work is in progress in manholes
to the east of Harbor Boulevard and at the project end. Street pavi~g
has been completed and traffic flows returned to normal.
Contractor anticipates job completion by the middle of June, 1975.
_JI...._ L......._A_l-4_A ___ B_.._RA_-Jl I BLVD ,, '--_ __..)fl.._ -"--J'' --~'l ~ L;;.._A.......,, H.;.;_~~BR_A_...JI I BLY D 11 tJI L· ·--------. :::=========
LAN\ SE.RT
r
COMPLETE
8811108 TO BE CONSTRUCTED
(
IMPERIAL RELIEF INTERCEPTOR
REA.CHES 22 & 23
CONTRACT NO. 3-1~
ul
.....
2
UJ
":)
a.
1.4 MILES OF 24", 21 11 , & 18 11 PIPE
CONTRACT AWARDED: OCTOBER 7, 1974
COST: $778,372
SCHEDULED FOR COMPLETION APRIL, 197~
(
CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT
MAY, 1975
KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 5 AND 6
CONTRACT NO, 3-20-1
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108.U ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-241 I
CONTRACTOR: SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY. STARTING DATE: DEC. 1974
CONTRACT PRICE: $4,602,992.00 COMPLETION DATE: OCT. 1975
Contract is· for installation of a 66" reinforced concrete pipe (R. C.P.) trunk line from the
intersection of Goldenwest Street and Westminster Avenue in Westminster to 1200 feet south
of Katella Avenue on Knott Avenue in Stanton, a distance of approximately 5 miles. Knott
Avenue is the n~rthern extension of GoldeY!lVest Street.
This project is a portion of the Knott Interceptor relief system designed to reZiev~ the
presently congested Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer by inter.cepting flows from the northwest portion
of District 3. The southerly terminus of .the system is at the int~rsection of Brookhurst
Street and Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley. It will eventually extend to Imperial Avenue
in La Habra. Contract 3-17 started at the south end in July 1972 and extended to Neu;land
Street and Balsa Avenue in County territoPJJ. Contract 3-17 was completed in March 1974.
Contract 3-18 started at this intersection and has been under construction for the last two
years extending to the intersection of Golderavest Street and Westminster Avenue. Contract
.3-20-1 connects in there and extends to the north. This portion of the relief system is
designed to handle a flow of 75 million gallons per day and will serve the proposed developed
.land use plan in the tributary area to the year 2010
The maphole structure and connection to the preceding trunk line section
(Contract 3-18) at Goldenwest Street and Westminster Avenue has been completed
and all obstructions to east-west traffic on Westminster Avenue removed.
Pipe installation has been completed to approximately 500 feet north of ·Trask
Avenue in Westminster, a total of 3,000 feet. Backfilling of the trench and
first-course asphalt paving has been completed to a point north of Fenway
Drive, within 1,000 feet of the pipe heading. Final paving will be installed
when the ground has been allowed to settle.
A second pipe heading was established just north of the Garden Grove Freeway
to allow tunneling under the freeway overpass portion for a minimum disruption
of traffic.on Goldenwest Street during pipe laying. Steel liner plate is
being installed in the tunnel prior to inserting the concrete pipe. The
tunnel will be 176 feet long; 150 feet has_ been completed.
Pipe laying is proceding from the tunnei heading northward to speed completion
~of the project; 400 ·feet of pipeline has been installed at ·the second heading
to just north of ~cacia Drive.
CONSTRUCTl.ON PROGRESS REPORT (CONTINUf:O) ·
HAY, 1975
KNOTT· INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 5 ~ND 6
CONTRACT NO. 3-20-1
PAGE TWO
Traffic on Goldenwest Street is lirr.i ted to cne lane, botl: ncrth 21: _: scut !:
bound, from Westminster Avenue to Garden Grove I3oulevc..r-d. This ccr:di t~(:ir:
is expected to continue for 5 more weeks. ':'raffic on Er:ott f.vent.:1.." !~c1·•,:: of
the Garden Grove Freeway \dll be restricted to one lane, boti: nc~ ... ~-!1 a?:,!
south, as necessary, as the project proceeds ..
(
E.t>WAR
GOLDEN
~ <
J::. c
~
{P
0 r
-t
WEST
)>
~
(D
rl
~ V'
-t
)> '" r-
\/)
" ~
C:,mp/~·le
....,... I I .' • e 8 e e 8 8 to be Lon::-r·ruC'."':'· _1
~--..:S!l!.!:P....:.::R~' N.:=..:G:.::C:.;,.;A~\...;;;.E _____ l l ..... _s_,._. __ I !:I ======; ._ ___ .... (/)
~
(
(J)
r
<
0
KNOTT
-=U:::;__, 1----+-F-----=-
,J<'n o-/-1 / n /.ere t'P lor
ReQc he:;~ ? .t '0
r
)>
>
-0
<n
0 z
)>
<
WESTERN
. --... -•. .... --- --------------~
(\
.x:
}>
'Q
~
> z
~
AV.
z ....
0 z
va
-4
0
;o
>
()
~
)>
z
z
f1l
r
PACIF\C RR
2. 8 n?/ /es 0 ./' ~~ // f'/pe
c~ ,;,' ...,.,,...~? c r t1tvCJro'e ': 31 ocl. 1"14
c~~../. $4,~03,ooo
-.. . .... I I
-: / .. · / . r -~.• r /"':',. rr.'f' 1::fh.'/1: 31 Cb: 75
CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT
MAY, 1975
TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, REACH 10
CONTRACT NO, 7-6-6
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
,108-44 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71-4) 540-2910
(71-4) 962-2411
CONTRACTOR: MCGUIRE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
CONTRACT PRICE: $575,575.40
STARTING DATE: JAN. 1975
COMPLETION DATE: JULY 1975
Contract is for instaZZation of a 27" diameter Vitrified Clay Pipe (V.C.P.) sewer from
the intersection of Red Hill Avenue and Mitohell Avenue in County territory west on .
Mitchell Avenue to Newport Avenue, then north to Irvine Boulevard in the City of Tustin,
a distance of approximately 1.7 miles.
This project is a part of the master-planned Tustin-Orange Trunk Line Relief system.
It UJill eventually extend north to Villa Park Road and Santiago Boulevard in Orange,
providing drainage for the central and northern portions of District?. Reaches 1·
through B, the Sunfl()l;)eri and Red HiU Trunk Lines, werie completed in /.1ay of 1972.
This section. will drain thriough those lines to Wastewater Reclamation Plant No. 1 in
Fountain Valley.
This section of the system is designed to handle flows of ·up to 9.64 million gallons
per day and will serve prioposed land use development of the tributary area to the year
2010.
Pipe laying has been completed on Mitchell Avenue, backfilled and finished
paving installed. The project is now continuing north on Newport Avenue.
Soil conditions are much better here than on Mitchell Avenue, causing the
contractor fewer problems and allowing better progress.
·The project heading is at the Santa Ana Freeway overpass. Traffic at this
point is restricted to one lane on the north bound side of the street.
This restriction is expected to last until the middle of June.
A second heading on Newport Avenue between Holt Avenue and Irvine
Boulevard to allow cohstruction of a siphon under the flood control channel
at that point has been completed with pipe in place from there to the end
of the project, backfilled and the first course of paving installed.
" ,,,
-.· ,• . -....
:;:,...
~
,,
l'"
~"
I
~
...........
0 '1 §
~
~
~
~
"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
JOINT OPERATING FUND
1975 -76 FISCAL YEAR
.l
DIST. 2
$.30.
DIST. 3
$.33
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
JOINT OPERATING FUND
FISCA~ YEAR 1975-76
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS SHARE OF
EXPENDITURE DOLLAR
BASED ON TOTAL GALLONAGE FLOW
OF 66,4 BILLION
SALARIES, WAGES .&
BENEFITS
. $·.53 ·
OPERATIONS
$ .4-0
BUDGETED EXPENDITURE DOLLAR
TOTAL BUDGET $5,102,326 .
DEPARTMENTAL ALLOCATION OF
· . EXPENDITURE DOLLAR
TOTAL ALLOCATION $5~102,326
....
I '.
Sched ule I
JOIN T OPERATING FUND BUDGET REVIEW & SUMMARY
COMPARISON OF BUDGETED & ACTUAL EXPENDITUR ES & ES T IMATED CARRY-OVER
Budget Recommended Increase Expenditures Estimated Increase Est'd Carry-Over
1974175 Budget or 1973/74 Expenditures or to Fisca l
* 1975/76 (Decrease) 1974/75 (Decrease) Year 1975/76
Sala r ies, Wages & Benefits $3, 190,635 $3,814,826 $624,191 $2,382,458 $2,857 ,935 $475,477 $ 332,700
LESS Chargebacks to CORF & Dists. 1,000,000 l, 100,000 100,000 912,156 939,873 27,717 60, 12 7
Net Salaries, Wages & Benefits
Ch argeab le to JO $2 ,190,635 $2,714,826 $524,191 $1,470,302 $1 ,918,062 $4 47 ,760 $ 272,57 3
Mate r ials, Supplies & Outside Services 704, 100 8 11 ,000 106,900 412 ,224 579,304 167,080 124,796
Odo r Control & Che~ical Coag ulants 373,000 507,000 134,000 · 50,338 166,563 116,225 206,437
Research & Monitoring 150, 150 154,500 4,350 108,038 120,256 12,218 29 ,894
Insu r ance (Net) 38, 150 45,000 6,850 25,049 38,009 12,960 141
Utilities 647,000 870,000 223,000 360,336 499,750 139,414 147,25 0
Tota l Joint Operating Expenses $4, 103,035 $5,102,326 $999,291 $2,426,287 $3,321,944 $895,657 $ 781,091
Revenue and Offsets 225,000 250,000 25,000 224,794 232,493 7,699 (7,493)
Net Joint Operating $3,878,035 $4,852,326 $974,291 $2,20 1,493 $3,089,451 $887,958 $ 788,584
Transfer to CORF 270,600 230,000 (40,600) 4 1 ,000 41,000 229 ,600
TOTAL $4, 148,635 $5,082,326 $933,691 $2 ,20 1,493 $3 ! 130,451 $928,958 $1!018,184
*Adjusted for authorized budget tran sfers
Distr ict
No.
2 ·
3
5
6
7
11
TO TALS
197 4/75
Flows
· (Pa st Year)
7,250 MG
18,755
20,013
3,605
3. 705
4, 16 1
4,417
61,906 MG
GAL LONAGE FLOWS
Estimated
Increase
471 MG
1, 155
1, 741
288
253
.291
327
4,526 .MG
BUDGE T RECOM ME.NDAT IONS
JO INT OPERAT I NG FUND
Fiscal Year 1975/76
ALLOCATION OF JOIN T OPERATING EXPENDI TURES AND TAX LEVY
FUNDING
Estima ted .Estimated Amo unt to
1975/76 Dis tr ict Es t i ma t ed be Raise d
Fl ows Contribution Carryover by Taxes
7, 72.1 MG $ 590,566 $ 122. 507 $ 468,059
19,9 10 1,523,173 301,360 I ,22 1 ,813
21. 754 1,664,462 321, 189 1,343,273
3,893 297,824 53,0 12 24 4,8 12
3,958 302,907 60,881 242 ,026 .
4,452 340,516 78, 156 262,360
4,744 362,878 8 1,079 28 1,799
66,43 2 MG $5,082,326 $1,018, 184 $4,064 , 142
SCH EDUL E I I
19 74 /75 COM PARI SON
District Amou nt Ra I sed
Contrlbut Ion by Tax es
$ 489,083 $ 415,329
1,249,887 1,059,598
1 ,333,2~4 I, 134 ,984
235,204 200,393
248,395 210,935
288,522 . 245,8 19
304,280 259,248
$4, 148,635 $3,526 ,306
JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1975-76 FISCAL YEAR
DISTRICT & FUND: Joint Operating
DEPARTMENT:
CLASSIFICATION: Summary
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE
SALARIES, WAGES & BENEFITS
Salaries & Wages
Employee Benefits:
Re t'iremen t (PERS)
Workm e n's Comp e nsa tion
Gro up Medical In s urance
Uni form Rental
TOTAL ·PAYROLL
LESS ~ Ch a rgebacks to:
Joint Works Capital Outlay
Individua l Districts
· Total Cha rgebacks
NET JO PAYROLL
APPROVED
BUDGET *
1974-75
2,711,521
277,959
62,021
111, l 57
27,977
3, 190,635
400 ,000
600,000
1,000,000
2, 190,635
ACTUAL
EXPtNDITURES
1974-75
(4th qtr estd)
2,446,039
239,693
49,854
97.953
24,396
2,857.935
375,537
564,336
939 ,873
1,918,062
RECOMMENDE D
BUDGET
1975-76
3;205,665
DATE:
SCHEDULE:
PAGE NO,
May 22, 1975
111
1 of 4
REMARKS
Schedule "A" of Personne l Recommendations
summarizes projected g ross salaries and
·wages assumi ng full employment of recom-
mended positions. Current two-year
contract with employees exp ires in
November , 1975. No allowance has been
made for general salary or fringe bene-
fit adjustments . In the event changes
are authorized and any accumulated payroll
savings are inadequate to fund the adjust-
ments, it will be neces sary to al locate
funds from the unappropri a ted reserve
accounts of the individual Di stricts.
327,610 F ixed by contract, PERS has advised that
they expect the employees' rate to
increase 1% per year for the next three
years be ginning 76-77.
70,676 Recent l egis lati ve changes have r es ulted
in a premium inc rea se of approximately
6.5%.
178,396 HMO plan p r em ium increased substantia lfy
this year a nd pursuant to the two-y ea r
agreement with the emp l oyees , the a dded
cost was borne by the Di s tricts.
.32' 479
3,814,826
450,000 Charged back to CORF through cost
accounting sys t em for work o n t reatme nt
plants' capital expansion.
6SO,OOO Charged back to indi v idu a l Di stricts
through cost accounting system for work
o n Districts ' coll ec tion facilities
capital expans ion , and maintenance and
repair of sa id system. Al so reflec t s
industrial waste division charges to
respec tive Di st ricts.
1,100,000
2,714,826 . Rep resents bal ance of payroll expenses
chargeabl e to operation and maintenance
of joint treatment and disposal works;
and administrative and research ac tivities.
.
JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
DISTRICT & FUND: Joint Operating
DEPARTMENT:
CLASSIFICATION: Summary
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE
MATERIALS, SUPPLIES & SERVICES
Gasoline, Oil & Fuel
Insurance
: I ~
Office Exp~nse
Operating Supplies:
Chlorine & Odor Control Ch em icals
Chemical Coagulants
1975-76 FISCAL YEAR
APPROVED
BUDGET *
1974-75
54,000
38,150
. 25,000
115,000
258,000
ACTUAL
EXPENDITURES
1974-75
(4th qtr estd)
39,266
38,009
15,670
111 ,853
54,710
RECOMMENDED
BUDGET
1975-76
60,000
DATE:
SCHEDULE:
PAGE NO,
May 22, 1975
111
2 of 4
REMARKS
For both fi xed and mobile equipment.
Gross expense indicated with motor pool
chargebacks r e flected under r evenue.
Price of petroleum products has increased
more than 50% and has stabilized somewhat.
Budget allocation refl ects increased
requirements for diesel-driven equipment
being used for solids handling, and powe r
generation during scheduled shutdowns.
45,000 ·For PL & PO, fire & extended coverage,
boiler & machinery, employee fidelity
bond and travel coverage. Last year the
Boards wer e a dvised of substantia l
insurance premium increases because of
the Lncreasing number o f claims filed
against the Districts, a nd the growing
reluctance of insurance companies with
respect to und erw riting envi r onment ally-
related activities, which is reflected
in their rate structures. Th e staff is
recommending tha t the Boards consider
a study of the Districts' insurance
needs and cove rage and has included
funds in the Professional Se rvices
budget for th is purpose.
25,000 Includes supplies & forms for all depart-
ments.
187,000 Budget allocation is p rimarily for odor
control at treatment plant sites . Annual
budget for this item prior to 1971-72
was $355,000. New Ocean Outfal,1 No. 2
was place d into service in 1971 and ha s
essentially eliminated need for ef fluent
chlorination . Howeve r, St ate & Fede ral
regulatory agencies have proposed oew
and conflic t ing regulat ion s which might
require r es ump tion of chlorination. In
that event it may be necessa ry to allocate
funds from the unappropriated reserve of
the individual Districts. Chlorine is
presently in short su p p ly and this fact
was reflected in bid prices received
last Dece mbe r which were up 55 %.
320,000 By changing the mode of our operation, we
have bee·n able to meet currently-enforced
discharge r egulations without chemical
additions. Howe ver, NPDES permit re-
quirements 'adopted by EPA and the RWQ
will require extensive chemical treatment.
As reported in the personnel recommen da-
tions, we are continuing discussions with
the Regional Board in this regard. If
unsuccessful, the total allocation will
be necessary.
JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1975-76 FISCAL YEAR
DISTRICT & FUND: Joint Operating
DEPARTMENT:
CLASSIFICATION: Summary
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE
Other Operating Supplies
Contractual Services
Profes s ional Services
·Printing & Publications
Rents & Lea ses -Equipment
Repairs & Maintenance
Research & Monitoring
APPROVED
BUDGET *
1974-75
94 ,200
79 ,800
70, 100
25,000
20,000
268,000
150, 150
ACTUAL
EXPENDITURES
1974-75
(4th qtr estd)
93,333
43, 121
44,814
23,988
19,491
26 7,570
120,256
•~-~--~
RECOMMENDED
BUDGET
1975-76
127 ,000 .
88,000
74,000
30,000
26,000
DATE:
SCHEDULE:
PAGE NO,
May 22, 1975
11 I
3 ·of 4
REMARKS
Supp lies required to ope r ate a nd mai ntai n
existing and expanding facilities and
l a boratory work. Allocation re flect s
inflationary trends.
Includes grit di sposal, trash disposal,
Alternate Fu e l Source St udy with Cou nty
and EDP.
Includes General Counsel r etai ner & l ega l
se rv ices, audit by CPA and odor consultant.
Funds al s o provided for insurance study
and "revenue program" consu lt ing services
requir e d by t he SWRCB & EPA pu r suan t t o
1972 Amendments to the Water Pollution
Control Act.
Budget increased to r e flect both inc reasi ng
prices, primarily due t o paper sho rta ge ,
and continuing demand by public for
info rmati on on Districts' activ it ies.
Staff continuing to u tilize for reporting
and anal ys i s for maximum e f fectiveness.
Rep roduct ion po li c i es have been changed
to minimize costs.
Fo r heavy eq ui pme nt required in ter-
mittently for majo r eq uipment repair.
Le ased ve hicl es authorized by Boards
have been red uced from five to four.
All ocation prov ides for increased rates
nego ti a ted by the County of Orange
under whose contract our veh i c l es are
l eased .
325,000 This item is of~ h i gh l y cont i ngent nature
and must allow f or unexpected major
equipment failures and maintenance of
154,500
new facilities that are con tinuall y being
pl aced in to service as pl a nt constructi on
projects are completed. Unprecedented
in creases i n t he cos t of parts & suppl ies ,
as mu ch as 120%, coupled with several
planne d repairs t o major equipme nt,
in c reas e the recommended budget a ll oca -
tion for this item.
Include s District s ' cont ribution to
So. Calif. Coa sta l Res ea rch Project
being conducted under joint powers agr ee-
ment. Marine ecology study required by
State in connection with ope rati on of new
outfall also included. Aga i n, as <eported
und e r t he personne l recommendations, the
RWQCB has placed requ irements in ou r NPDES
permit which apparently extend beyond the
intent o f the 1972 Act. If our efforts
with the Regi o nal Boa rd are un success ful
and monitoring r equ ireme nts are not r ed uced
It may be necessa ry to trans f e r as much as
$150 ,000 from the Unappropriated Reserve
Accounts of the individua l Districts . ' .
JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1975-76 FISCAL YEAR
DISTRICT & FUND: Joint Operating
DEPARTMENT :
CLAS SIFIC AT I ON: Sunmary
DESCRIPTI ON OR ACCOUNT TITLE
·rravel, Meeting & Training
Uncollectable Accounts
Utilities
;,
Other Expenses
Expens es Appl icable to Prior Years
TOT AL MATER IALS, SUPPL I ES
& SERV I CES
TOTAL JO REQUIREM ENTS
LE SS: Revenue s
NET JO REQUIREMENTS
Transfer to CORF
. GRAND TOTAL
APPROVED
BUDGET *
1974-75
17 ,000
647,000
11,000
40,000
1,912,400
4, 103,035
225,000
3,878,035
270,600
4,148,635
'* Adjus ted to reflect author i zed budg e t tra ns f e rs
ACTUAL
EXPEND ITURES
1974 -75
(4th qtr estd)
12,611
499 ,750
10,609
8,831
1,403,882
3, 321 ,944
232,493
3,089,451
41,000
3.. 130,45 1
RECOMMENDED
BUDGET
1975-76
17,000
1,000
870,000
16,000
22,000
2, 3.87, 500
5,102,326
250,000
4,852,326
230,000
5,082,326
DATE:
SCHEDULE:
PAGE NO,
May 22, 19 75
111
4 of 4
REMARKS
Major items are authorized by specific
Board actions. Expandi ng act i vities of
regulatory agen cies r equ i re increased
Board member and staff trave l. Districts
also cont i nue to emphasize ongoing train -
ing of employees as operation of
facilities becomes more technical and
complex.
Major item is purchased e lectrical power .
We have experienced a 127% increase i n
un i t costs during the past two years.
SCE has advised that we may expect an
additional 20% increase in the average
unit cost du r i ng the ne xt yea r, Cou pled
with increas ing demand from fu l l -s cale
ope ra tion of s ludge dewater ing eq u ipment,
and pl acing of add i tiona l new equipment
on the line, a l so serve to significantly
in crease energy de mand . Also, the
1000 HP e l ectr i c booster pu mps ha ve to
be "on-l i ne" more hours to meet peaking
req uirements until addit i onal gas -dri ven
pu~p ins t allations are comp l eted in
1976-77.
Maj o r i tem is f re ight i n and out and
reflects expected rise i n r ates due to
petroleum costs .
Acco unt r equ ired by Un i form Account i ng
System.
Sa l es of mi scel l aneous sewage tr eatment
process. by-pro du c t s , jo int 1·1o r k s treat-
ment industrial surcharges, equipment &
sampling chargebacks to i ndividua l
Districts and mi scellaneous items .
Provides for payment to Cap i tal Outlay
Revolving Fu nd for spa re parts acqu i r ed
under Contrac t Pl-16 a t considerab l e
sav ings over what they cou l d be purchased
f o r separate l y . Parts wi ll be p l aced in
warehouse invento r y fo r future r epai r s
and rep l acements.
COUNTY SANITATION . DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND
· JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION
19 7 5 -76 . FISCA.L YEAR
DIST. 2
$.30
DIST. 3
$ .33
. ~ISTRfCTS .S.HARE OF · JO INT WORKS
CAPITAL OUTLAY DOLU\R BASED ON
EQUITY PERCENTAGE
17
16
1.5
14
13
ti) a: < ...:l 12
...:l
0
0 11
i:.i.
0
ti) 10
:z:
0
H 9 ...:l
...:l
H 8 ~
z
H 7
!-
~
~ 6
::i
~
~~s # ~'\.{9
{$-cs.
c.,t:t-s~
f..v,,'V ~"\;)'-><(,
'O
...:l s < AMOUNT RAISED BY TAXES s 4l---+----+...----1;--!-r-t-~--L
3
2
1
65
66
66
67
67
68
68
69
69
70
70
71
71
IT
CASH BUDGET REQUIREME~TS & EXPENtiITURES
AND TAXES RAISED
FEDERAL & STATE
CONSTRUCTION GRANTS
$.53
CARRY-OVER
& RESERVES
. $ .36
SOURCE OF BUDGETED
REVENUE DOLU\R
72
73
/
73
74
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
)
I
74
75
75
76
$26.0
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND
SUMMARY OF DISTRICTS' REQUIREMENTS AND COMPARATIVE DATA FOR JOINT WORKS EXPANSION
Fisca l YP.ar 1974-75
1975-76 Requirements
Equity Net Cash Estimated Fed eral State mounts To Be
Distr ict Perc ent Re uirements Carr -O ver Partlcl at ion Rai sed b Taxes
9, 51 $ 2,475, 738 $ 897 ,934 $ 21,873 $ 1,318,18 1 $ 237,750
2 29.83 7,765,644 2,816,550 68,609 4,134,735 745,750
3 J2.88 8,559,650 3,104,530 75,624 4,557,496 822,000
5 6.62 1,723.385 625,060 15,226 917,599 165,500
6 5,87 1,528, 137 554,245 13,501 813,641 146,750
7 8.22 2, 139,913 776, 132 18,906 1,139,375 205,500
.11 7,07 1,840,533 667,549 16,26 1 979,973 176 ,750
TOTALS 100 .0 $26,033,000 $9,442,000 $230,000 $13,861,000 $2,500,000
--
Schedule A
Page 1
5/.22/75
1974-75 Comparative Amount
Net Cash Amount Raised
Requirements By Ta xes
$ 3,205,419 $ 232,828
I0,067,4 90 732,232
10,973,296 811 ,519
2, 145,859 181 ,268
1 ,962,024 142, 135
2,690,680 225,480
2,379,832 174,538A
$33,424 ,600 $2,500,000
CAPIJAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUNO
SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS
1975-76 FISCAL YEAR
GRANT FUNDED PROJECTS
1. 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Plant
a.t Reclamation Plant No. 1
Less: Deferred 1976-77 Budget Allocation
2. Reliability Facilities at Pla nt No. 2
Less: Deferred 1976-77 Budget Allocation
3. Facilities Plan & JPL Evaluation (1974-75
Special Project)
SUB-TOTAL -GRANT FUNDED PROJECTS
NON-GRANT FUNDED PROJECTS
New & Rebudgeted Major Projects:
1. Extend Outfall Surge Towe r
2. New Sedim entat ion Basins 0 & P
(Mechanisms Only)
3. Brookhurst St. improvements
4. Addiiional centrifuge at Plant No. 2
5. Foul Air Scrubber at Plant No . 2
6 . Gas Mixing for Digesters at Plant No. 2
7~ Addi~ional Pumping Facilities
New & Rebudgeted Minor Projects
1. Reclamation Plant No.
2. T~eatment Plant No. 2
3. Equipment
Special Projects
1. Solids Treatme nt, Handling &
Disposal
Less: Deferred 1976-77 Budget Allocation
2. Digester Gas Scr.ubbing
3. Odor Control
SUB-TOTAL -NON-GRANT FUNDED . PROJECTS
RESERVE FOR FUTURE BUDGET ALLOCATIONS
(Job Pl-16)
(Job J-6-1)
TOT AL JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCT ION REQUIREMrnT S
LESS AVAILABLE FUNDING
1 . Estimated carryover and construction reserve
from 1974-75
2. Federal & State construction grants
3. Transfer from Joint Operating Fund for spare parts
required under Contract Pl-16
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
Net Amount to be Raised by Ta xes for CORF
FOR COMPARISON: Taxes Raised 1968-69
1969-70
1970-71
1971-72
1972-73
1973-74
1974-75
$4, 180,000
3,800,000
3,800,000
2 ,000,000
2,500,000
2,500,000
2,500,000
500,000
250,000
18,592,000
2,592,000
4,500,000
3,600,000
200,000
200,000
1!)0,000
250 ,000
150,000
150,000
1,250,000
525,000
489,000
396;000
250,000
300,000
250,000
9,442,000
13,861 ,ODO
230,000
16,000 ,000
900,000
3.375,000
2,350,000
1,410,000
800,000
Schedule B
Page 2
May 22 , 1975
20,275,000
4,560,000
1, 198,000
26,033,000
23,533,000
2,500,000
CAPITA L OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND
NEW & REBUD GET ED MINOR PROJECTS -REC LAMATION PLANT NO.
Fisc al Year 1975 -76
1 . Modify Ignition systems -sludge gas engines
2 . Repl a ce bar screen chains -Headworks
3 . Replace and modify grit augers -Headworks
4. Replace District flow reco r ders in Control Center
5. Relocate Moore encoder -Control Center
6 . Construct protective building over plant water and
chlorine tanks ·
7. Replace digester controller for dlgesters 5, 6, 7 & 8
8 . Expand outside lighting system contro l s
9. Repl &ce flow & dens i ty recorders fo r 3, 4 & 5 basins
10. Expa nd DC power s upp l y
11 . Protective coating for l aunder walls -clarifiers 3 & 4
12 . Laborato r y , Resources Management Center, and lunch room
Improvements, and central air co nditi oni ng and
modifications to Administration Bu i lding
13 . Natural gas metering
14. Entrance and building id ent ification signs
15 . Digester cleaning equ i pme nt
16. New scum pump for basins 3 & 4
17. Automatic gate ope rators at diversion struc ture
18 . New well at main e ntrance
19. Rehabilitate Ellis Pump Station
20 . Demo liti on of abandoned shop
21. Demolition and abandonment of meter vaults
22. Miscell aneous paving
23. Landsc api ng improveme nts
24. Mi sce llaneous small projec ts
$
Sche du le C
Pa g e 3
5/22/75
2,000
2,000
4,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
4,000
3 ,500
7,500
2,500
12,500
140,000
3,500
7,000
50,000
12,500
25,000
40,000
25,000
4,000
15,000 .
25,000
25,000
100,000
$525,000
'l
-
\
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND
Schedule· D
Page 4
5/22/75
NEW & REBUDGETED MINOR PROJECTS -TREATMENT .PLANT NO. 2
Fiscal ·Year 1975-76
I. Additional supervisory controls $ 20,000
2. Remodel Incinerator 3,000
3. Remodel air compressor 41 ,000
4. Engine #10 gear box & overhaul -He adworks "C" 11,000
5 . Digester cleaning equipment 50 ,000
6 . Upgrad e effluent chlorination station 10,000
8. Remodel digester "3" cover 5,000
9, Sec ur ity gat e opera tor 5,000
10. Polymer bin hood 3,500
11. Grit augers and hoppers at Phlanz Headworks 35 ,000
12 . Devise circulation pumps for d igeste r feed 16,500
13. "B" clarifier chains 20,000
14. Fresh c:ir ducting at Headworks "C" 15,000
15 . New foul air fans 14,000
16 . ·Remodel ent rance road 15,000
17. Miscellaneous paving 25,000
18.· Landsca pi ng imp r oveme nts 50,000
19. Bowl Head skimmers 50,000
20. Miscellaneou s sma ll pr6jects 100,000
$489,000
.1 .
Equipment Total Adm In.
Tr ucks & Vehic l es $ 40,280
Other Mobile Equipment 109,273
Machine Equipment & Tools 109,926
Communication Equipme nt 17,4 13
Safety & Traffic Control
· Equl pment 1,377
Ins trumenta t I on & Testing
Equipment ·64 ,480
Office Equipment & Furniture 39,707 $27,280
Other Equipment 13 ,544 10,744
$396,000 $38,024
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND
JO INT WORKS REQUIREMENTS
1975 -76 Fiscal Year
Proj . & Col 1.
Pit. Mtce. Fae. Mech.
$ 40,280
100,793
$7,420 $5,480 77,856
265
530
636
$ 7 ,420 $6,1 16 $219 ,724
Elect. Oper .
8,480
9,842
17,148
953
2,539 $8,480
2,639
$41 ,601 $8,480
Schedule E
Pa ge 5
5/22/75
Lab &
Res.
424
52,931
3,698
2,800
$59,8 53
Engr .
9,328
5,454
$14,782
1,
EPA OEFICIAL REFUSES GRANT REQUEST
Newport Bay Agency Receives Setback
B Y DALE FETHERLING
Times Slaff Writer.
The U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency-'s regional administrator
turned thumbs down Tuesday on ap-
proving a new planning agency for the
Newport Bay area, just as the county
also was taking the agency to task.
In a turbulent day for the newly
formed Newport-Irvine Waste Man-
agement Planning Agency (NIWA),
EPA Regional Administrator Paul
DeFalco. in •San Francisco, disap-
lends itself especially well to the study
and control of nonpoiht sources, which
are said to be the cause of worsening
proved its'designation as recipient of a
federal grant for a two-year pollution
study of the bay watershed.
The Board of Supervisors, in an
apparently unrelated action, accused
NIWA of making "an end-run" around
the county. The board voted unani-
mously to send a telegram to EPA
urging that NIWA not be given the
grant.
In addition, ~he supe~visors sched-
uled a report for next Tuesday on
whether the county itself shouldn't be
I
leading the pollution study.
The federal and county actions
appear to pose serious problems for
NIWA, which was formed two months
ago in hopes of winning a "208" plan-
ning program grant -named for
Section 208 of the Federal Water
Pollution Con~rol Act.
The 208 process is designed to coor-
dinate planning by otherwise inde-
pendent agencies and also to integrate
• water quality planning with that of
quality and solid waste. The ~
recommended NIW A's designation -'[mt ~ngt(~ ~i~ * 3
has indicated other funds might be R Wed.,June4, 1975-Pa rtll
available from either state or federal
water quality in Newpor~ Bay. sources. to send a telegram to Train "strongly
Alexander Bowie, tsecretary· of NIWA was formed under the lead-objecting" to any designation for
NIWA, said Tuesday that he hopes a ership of the. Irvine Ranch Water NIWA until the six cities in the water-
_ meeting can soon be set up among District and now also includes the shed are invited to join and until the
NIWA, EPA, and the county to try to Orange County Water District, County county , the county's Flood Control and
iron out the differences. Sanitation District No. 5, and Newport Harbors, Beathes and Parks districts
DeFalco is believed to have turned ·Beach. join NIWA as separate entities.
down NIWA's designation on the b?sis From the beginning, though, there's The county has sought separate
that the bay watershed is too small to been some concern about the group's voting rights fo r each of its three
qualify for areawide planning funds. membership being mostly sewering agencies.
However, his action reportedly is in agencies, rather than the county and NIWA, on the other )land, decided
the form of a recommendation to EPA cities which might have to imp lement not ~o tack le the question of voting
Administrator Russell. Tr ain, thus any resultant pollution-control plan rights until after the EPA acted and
leaving open an avenue· of appeal if Supervisor Ralph Clark protested perhaps set conditions on membership,
NIWA can't get DeFalco to reconsider. Tuesday that NIWA had made appli-Bowie said. He also contended NIWA
-Io addition, the State Water Re-cation for the EPA grant without the has been actively pursuiDf the~
.!!!p!'t!!!:Oontrol Board -which ha~ __ co_u:;;n;;:ty'::JO:::. =in=in::g:::. =H:--e_w_o_n_boar __ d_a;...p:...pr_o_v_al..,.,....w_a_t..:..er..:..s.:..::.he.::..:d..:..c:,,,it,,.:.ie::,.;s.;.fo;,;r,,;m::;e;;m;,ber,;,,,;;'&::.,==~~
•
MEETING DATE June 11, 1975 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1.2 ,3,5,6 ,7 & 11
DISTRICT 1
RIMA •••••• -+ ___ _
('" .EDR~CH) ••••• BATTIN···· ---; ----
( J\NS •••••••• GARTHE • • ·• • ------
(SHARP •••••••• SALTARELLI._,; ____ _
DISTRICT 2 QJ:;.
L VONS • • • • • •.• CALLAHAN· • • _j__ _v __ _
Ori, TNG •••••••• CHAPUT ••••• ./ .;
I ~----DR ICH) .•••• CLARK .••••. _____ _
GARTtiE) ••••••• EVANS.····. _./ ____ _
THOM) ••••••••• KAYWOOD .•.. _1 ____ _
FOX) •••••••••• MAC KA IN. • • __L_ ___ _
PERRY. • • • • • I
ISVALSTAD) ••••• SCOTT .•• ••• -/-----
PEREZ) •••••••• TEMPLE ••••• .; === === DUNN~) •••••••• WINN •••••• • I
WARD) ••••••••• WOOD ••••••• ·-y-----
GRAHAM) ••••••• YOUNG...... I === ===
DISTRICT 3
(HOMRIGHAUSEN). COX········ _./ ___ --
AMO··.····· _L_ __ --
(COLLINS) .••••• BYRNE······_; ____ _
CULVER····. _J ____ _
GRIFFIN).····· DAVIS ·····. _I ____ _
GARTHE). ······EVANS······ _./ ____ _
MAC Ki IN) •• • •• FOX· •••••.. _.1 ____ _
SONJU • • • •• • •• FRANKIEWICH _/ ____ _
NEV I l-· · · · .... GRAHAM· ..•• _1 ____ _
THOM).·······. KAYWOOD •••. _J ____ _
BLACKMAN) ••••• MC KNEW. • • • fv .
DIEDRJCH) ••••• SCHMIT..... v === ===
GIBBS).· •••••• SHIPLEY.... ./
STANTON) •••••• SVALSTAD ••• ~ ----
WOOD) •• •• ••••• WARD ••••••• ---;;-----
ARB I SO) ••••••• WEISHAUPT. j === ===
DISTRICT 5
~RYCKOFF ). • · • • • MC INN Is. · ·
DIEDRICH).···· RILEY·····
I/ ------_J ____ _
ROGERS • • • · ,/ ------
DISTRICT 6
(MC INNIS) .•••• STORE •••..• _J ____ _
(DIEDRICH) ••••• BATTIN •.... _J ____ _
RIMA ••••... _v ____ _
DISTRICT 7
,/ EVANS • • • • • • • GARTHE. • · ·• _____ _
f "HONY) • • • • • BURTON • • • • • _.1 ____ _
D'rEDRICH) • · • • CLARK • • • • • _L_ ___ _
MC INNIS)···· ~ · ••. __:!__ ___ _
GLOCKNER · · • ~ ___ _ (TEMPL~) · · • • • · JACKMAN···._/ ____ _
(SHARP)······. SALTARELLI· _I ____ _
D ~fRICT 11
(DIEDRJCH) •••• SCHMIT ••••• _!_ ___ _
(GIBBS) ....... DUKE .. l:n-'.. ./
(WIEDER) ...... GIBBS. UK .. t:/ === ===
DISTRICT 8
MITCHELL··· (JOHNSON~·· ••• HOLM· • • • • • • === === ===
(DIEDRICH) •••• RILEY···.·· ------
5/29/75
JOINT BOARDS
AMO · · · · • · · · v v DIEDRIC~) ••••• BATTIN·····=== .1 I
ANTHONY •.•••• BURTON····· __ __:!_(
COLLI~S •••••• BYRNE······· __ __:!.__v
L VONS ••••• • • • CALLAHAN • • • _,,, _ __l_!
EWING •••••••• CHAPUT· • • • • • _./ _ __!__i
DIEDRICH) ••••• CLARK·······_./ ___ /_1
HOMR I GHAUSEN) ·COX· • • • • • • • • _.; __ .;_J
CULVER...... ,/ I J
GRIFFIN) ••••• 0 DAVIS· • · • • • • -v ---,;-,
MC INN Is) ••••• DeSTA L-0 •••• ----;:;-~./
GIBBS) •••••••• DUKE.······· -v ---.1 -1
GARTHE) ••••••• EVANS· • • • • • • -.; -/ I
MAC KiIN) ••••• FOX ••••.•••• -.;-.1 J
SONJU •.•••••• FRANKIEWICH . -.1 ---,-J ----; EVANS ....... GARTHE...... v J
WIEDER) ••••••• GIBBS ••••••• -./--r"
I
GLOCKNER •••• ---r;_;-~~ NEVIL)~···· .•. GRAHAM •••••• .1 .1 v
TEMP EJ ••••••• JACKMAN..... .1 " v
THot-iY ••••••••• KAvwoon ••••• / / ./
FOXJ.. ~ ••••••• MAC KAIN •••• _.1 ___ .1_v
RYCOFFJ. ~ ••••• MC INNIS •••• ~ __ -
(BLACKMANJ .•••. MC KNEW .•••• _&_ ~ ~
PERRY. • • • • • • ./ .; .;
(DIEDRICH).··. ·RILEY· •• •••• J J ./
RIMA •.•••.•• _.; ___ ii_.;
ROGERS .•.••• _I ___ .1 _.J
SHARP). •..•••• SAL TARE LL I. . _.1 _ ~
DIEDRICH) ••.•• SCHMIT •••••• -"-__ .1_.1
SVALSTAD) ••••• SCOTT ••••••• _J ___ .1_.1
GIBBS) ..•••••• SH I PLEY ••••• _.J ___ .f_v
MC INNIS).··· ·STORE······· ,; _.;_.
STANTON) •••••• svALSTAD···· ~ ___f!:::_f
PER El)· • • • • • • ·TEMPLE· • · • • • _J ___ .I_,;
WOOD) ••••••••• WARD· •••.••• _1 ___ ,_ . ./
ARBISo) •••••.. wEISHAUPT··· I .. .I DUNN~) •••••• ··WINN·· •••••• / .1 I
WARD) •.•••.••• wooD •••••..• I J ~
GRAHAM)·· • • • •• YOUNG.· • • • • • -;- -/-
OTHERS
cJqrR~ rJru· Q{r-v-<
~ (\,.
~lfl~'--
,_I ~",J.0--
HARPER
SYLVESTER
LEWIS
CLAR KE
v TAYLOR
BROWN
~. tll-.v-t/ fl WOODRUFF ~1 1 { t11~L_,: (; EWING
1)1~', / ~n / / HOHENER
M cl...-U")~· HOWARD
')' [ -HUNT L1 · (Cc . l --i} KE 1 TH
/1,;( 1(/1'>"" .'"" KEN NEY
...+---LYNCH 1f ~i MADDOX
{J MART I NSON
PIERSALL
STEVENS
----
-,/-
~
r~G DATE June 11, 1975 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11
DISTRICT l
R I MA • • • • • • __JL:_ __ __
~J'TEDR~CH) ••••• BATTIN • • • • ~ ----
....-ANS •••••••• GARTHE • • • • ~ ----
SHARP •••••••• SALTARELLI·~ ----
DISTRICT 2
L VONS • • • • • • • ·CALLAHAN· • • ~ ----,. lNG •••••••• CHAPUT •• ···~ ___ _
11rEDR ICH) ••••• CLARK •• •••• ~ ___ _
GARTliE) •.••••• EVANS.····· _lL_ ___ _
THO~) ••.•••••• KAYWOOD •••• ~ ___ _
FOX) ••••.••••• MAC KAIN.·· v ___ _
PERRY •••• • • v ___ _
!SVALSTAD) ••••• SCOTT ••• ••• ~ ___ _
PEREZ) •••••••• TEMPLE •••• • ~ ___ _
DUNNE) •••••••• WINN. • • • • • • _::L_
WARDJ ••••••••• wooD ••••••• ~
GRAHAM) ••••••• YOUNG •••••• ~ ~ ~
DISTRICT 3
(HOMRIGHAUSEN). COX········ ~ ----
AMO •••••••• ~ ___ _
(COLLINS).·.··· BYRNE.····· ~ __ --
CULVER····· ~ ___ _
GRIFFIN).····· DAVIS······ ~ __ --
GARTHE)· • • • • • • EVANS······ ~ ___ _
MAC ~IN).···· FOX········ ~ ___ _
SONJU • • • ••• • • FRANKIEWICH · ~ ___ _
NEVIl-• ·······GRAHAM·.·.· ~ ___ _
THOM).····.··· KAYWOOD ••• • ~ ___ _
BLACKMAN) •• ••• MC KNEW ••• • ()_., ___ _
DIEDRJCH) ••••• SCHMIT ••••• ~ ___ _
GIBBS) •••••••• SHIPLEY.... V
STANTON) •••••• SVALSTAD... OJ ----
WOOD) ••••••••• WARD ••••••• ~ ----
ARB I SO) ••••••• WE I SHAUPT. ~ ~ ~
DISTRICT 5
I.
(RYCKOFFJ· ·····MC INNIS··· ~ __ --
(DIEDRICH).···· RILEY • • • • • ~ ___ _
ROGERS • • • • __.lL._ ___ _
DISTRICT 6
(MC INNIS) ••••• STORE •••••• ~ ___ _
(DIEDRICH) ••••• BATTIN ••••• ~ ___ _
RIMA ••••••• _..JL:__ ___ _
DISTRICT 7
EVANS • • • • • • • GARTHE • • • • • V ___ _
f .,..HONY) • • • • • BURTON····· ~ __ --
0-rtDR ICH) • • • • CLARK • • • • • ~ ----
MC INNIS)···· B88TM... · .. · · v ___ _
GLOCKNER • • • ~ ___ _
(TEMPLE) • • • • • • JACKMAN····~ __ --
(SHARP) • • • • • • • SALTARELLI • V:-___ _
D?e"fRICT 11
(DIEDRJCH) •••• SCHMIT..... V ___ _
(GIBBS) ••.•••• DUKE • • • • • • • V" ___ _
(w I EDER) •.•••• GIBBS • • • • • • i/ ___ _
5/29/75
JO I NT BOARDS \.;\la.)l_,
AMO········~*DIEDRIC~) ••••• BATTIN ••••• ~ t I
ANTHONY •••••• BURTON·····~
COLLI~S •••••• BYRNE·······~
LYONS •••••••• CALLAHAN···~
EWING •••••••• CHAPUT······~~
DIEDRICH) ••• • • C_LARK· • • • • • • IL..-* HOMRIGHAUSEN).COX·········~ 4-
CULVER······~+
GRIFFIN) •••••• DAVIS·······~ ~
MC INNIS) ••••• S88lAL······~-¥-
GIBBS) •••••••• DUKE········ .,..,.---1;-
GARTHE) ••••••• EVANS·······~ -f:-;:-
MAC K~IN) ••••• FOX ••••••••• ~ t
SONJU •••••••• FRANKIEWICH.~
EVANS ~ ••••••• GARTHE •••••• ~
WIEDERJ ••••••• GIBBS ••••••• ~ _!:I.__
GLOCKNER •••• 0--o_.-
NEV IL) j ....... GRAHAM •••••• J£:::._ ~
TEMPl-E ••••••• JACKMAN ••••• v -f--;-
THO~) ••••••••• KAYWOOD ••••• ~~
FOX) ••••••••• MAC KAIN •••• ~+.-
BLACKMAN} •• :::Mc KNEw.::::~-£-
PERRY ••••••• ~ 4---
(DIEDRICH). ····RILEY······· V""'" ~
RIMA •••••••• ~~
ROGERS •••••• ~ -f..:--
SHARP) •••••••• SALTARELLI •• ~-+
DIEDRICH) ••••• SCHMIT •••••• ~ ~
SVALSTAD) ••••• SCOTT ••••••• L_-¥-
GIBBs) •••••••• SHIPLEY····· ~ ~
MC INNis) ••••• sTORE······· ~ ~
STANTON) •••••• svALSTAD···· ~ ~
PEREi) •••••••• TEMPLE······ ~ ~
wooDJ ••••••••• wARD········ ~__if;-
ARB1so) ••••••• wEISHAUPT··· ~ _i./--
DUNNE)· • • • • • • ·WINN· • • • • • • • -.L-_!f---
WARD) ••••••••• WO.OD· • • • • • • • L.._ +,--
GRAHAM) ••••••• YOUNG·······~ -r--
OTHERS
HARPER
SYLVESTER
LEWIS
CLARKE
TAYLOR
BROWN
WOODRUFF
EWING
HOHENER
HOWARD
HUNT
KEITH
KENNEY
LYNCH
MADDOX
MARTINSON
PIERSALL
STEVENS ..
t"~t:T fNG DATE June 11 r 1975 TIME 7:30 p.rn. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5,6,7 & 11
DISTRICT 1
RIMA •••••• ------~1"·tDR~CH) ••••• BATTIN···· ------
biir'ANS •••••••• GARTHE • • • • ------
SHARP •••••••• SALTARELLI. ----__
DISTRICT 2
L VONS • • • • • • • ·CALLAHAN· • • _____ _
,. lNG •••••••• CHAPUT •••• • _____ _
lJTEDR ICH) ••••• CLARK.· ••• • _____ _
GARTtiEJ ••••••• EVANS.···· • _____ _
THO~) ••••••••• KAYWOOD •••• _____ _
FOX) •••••••••• MAC KAIN.·· _____ _
PERRY ••••••
!SVALSTAD) ••••• scOTT •••••• === === ===
PEREZ) •••••••• TEMPLE ••••• _____ _
DUNNE) •••••••• WINN. • • • • • •
WARD) ••••••••• WOOD ••••••• _____ _
GRAHAM) ••••••• YOUNG •••••• _____ _
DISTRICT 3
(HOMRIGHAUSEN). COX········ __ ----
AMO· ••••••• _____ _
(COLL I NS)· • • • • ·BYRNE· • • • • • _____ _
CULVER ••••• _____ _
GRIFFIN)······ DAVIS······ _____ _
GARTHE). • • • • • • EVANS······ _____ _
MAC ~IN).···· FOX······.· _____ _
SONJU • • • • • • • • FRANKIEWICH _____ _
NEVIL-• ·······GRAHAM ••••• _____ _
THOM).·······. KAYWOOD •••• _____ _
BLACKMAN) ••••• MC KNEW •••• _____ _
DIEDRJCH) ••••• SCHMIT ••••• _____ _
GIBBS) •••••••• SHIPLEY •••. _____ _
STANTON) •••••• SVALSTAD •••
wooD} ••••••••• wARD ••••••• ==:= ==:= ==:=
ARB ISO) ••••••• WEISHAUPT •
DISTRICT 5
~RYCKOfFJ. ·····MC INNIS···
DIEDRICH). • • • • RI LEY • • • • •
ROGERS • • • •
DISTRICT 6
(MC INNIS) ..... STORE ...... _____ _
(DIEDRICH) ••••• BATTIN ••••• _____ _
RIMA ••••••• _____ _
DISTRICT 7
EVANS • • • • • • • GARTHE • • • • • ____ --
I -HONY) • • • • • BURTON····· ____ --
JJ,-fDR ICH) • • • • CLARK • • • • • _____ _
MC INNIS) .. •• DOSTAL·· .. • _____ _
GLOCKNER • • • _____ _
(TEMPLE) • • • • • • JACKMAN···· _____ _
(SHARP)······· SALTARELLI· _____ _
D~fRICT 11
(DIEDRJCH) •••• SCHMIT ••••• _____ _
(GIBBS) ••.•••• DUKE •••••••
(w I EDER) •.•••• GIBBS •••••• === === ===
DISTRICT 8
MITCHELL··· _____ _
(JOHNSoNi • •••• HOLM • • • • • • • _____ _
(DIEDRICH) • ••• RILEY······ _____ _
5/29/75
JOINT BOARDS \~(fl.)L3)
AMO········ 4,-____ DIEDRIC~) ••••• BATTIN ·····_:!/..--___
ANTHONY •••••• BURTON ·····-t-;-____
COLLI~S •••••• BYRNE·······-¥--____
LYONS •••••••• CALLAHAN···~ _____
EWING •••••••• CHAPUT······~ _____
DIEDRICH) ••••• CLARK·······+ __
HOMRIGHAUSEN).cox ••••••••• 4:---
CULVER······ --i./--__
GRIFFIN) •••••• DAVIS·······t-__
MC INN Is) ••••• BOS"f>'<t.· • • • • • + __
GIBBS) ........ DUKE·· • • • • • • +,-__
GARTHE) ••••••• EVANS·······~
MAC K~I N). •••• FOX ......... --4:---
SONJU •••••••• FRANKIEWICH.-¥---===
EVANS ~ ••••••• GARTHE •••••• --T--
WI EDERJ ••••••• GIBBS ••••••• ---¥--__
GLOCKNER. • • • 0...-
NEV IL) { .••.••• GRAHAM •.••.. ~===
TEMPL-EJ .••.••• JACKMAN ••.•• t THO~J ••.•••.•• KAYWOOD..... ===
FOXJ. • .. ..... MAC KA IN .. ..
~... . .... *-
BLACKMANJ ••••• MC KNEW. • • • • a_, --
PERRY ••••••• _y__ ===
(DIEDRICH)····. RILEY·.····· __:j__ __
RIMA •••••••• _'::{__ --
ROGERS •••••• _:t_ --
SHARP) •• ~ ••••• SALTARELLI.. _:t._ --
DIEDRICH ••••• SCHMIT •••••• __::/-.;---
SVALSTAD ••••• SCOTT ••••••• ± --
GIBBS) •••••• • • SH I PLEY • • • • • __
MC INN Is)· • • • ·STORE· • • • • • • _1_ --
STANTON).····· SVALSTAD· • • • ~ __
PEREi) • • • • • • • ·TEMPLE· • • • • • _i_ __
wooDJ ••••••••• wARD········ _:t_ __
ARB I so) ••••••• WE I SHAU PT ••• 4.---
DUNNE}· • • • • • • ·WINN· • • • • • • • __:t_ __
WARDJ ••••••••• wooD •••••••• ~ __
GRAHAM)· • • • • • • YOUNG· • • • • • • _::L._ __
OTHERS
HARPER
SYLVESTER
LEWIS
CLARKE
TAYLOR
BROWN
WOODRUFF
EWING
HOHENER
HOWARD
HUNT
KEITH
KENNEY
LYNCH
MADDOX
MARTINSON
PIERSALL
STEVENS
..
,.
DISTRICT NO. 1
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 2
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 3
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 5
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 6
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 7
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 11
Directors present:
Directors absent:
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
June 11, 1975 -7:30 p.m.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
ROLL CALL
Kerm Rima (Chairman), Robert Battin, John
Garthe, and Donald Saltarelli
None
Michael Callahan (Chairman), Dale Chaput,
Ralph Clark, Vernon Evans, Miriam Kaywood,
Leonard MacKain, Bob Perry, George Scott,
Joe Temple, Donald Winn, Frances Wood, and
Robin Young
None
Phillip Cox (Chairman), Lowell Amo, Edward
Byrne, Norman Culver, Jesse Davis, Vernon
Evans, Donald Fox, Alice Frankiewich,
Beth Graham, Miriam Kaywood, Laurence
Schmit, Donald Shipley, Bernie Svalstr .. d,
Robert Ward, and Martha Weishaupt
Thomas McKnew
Don Mcinnis (Chairman), J'homas Riley, and
Howard Rogers
None
John Store (Chairman), Robert Battin, and
Kerm Rima
None
John Garthe (Chairman), John Burton, Ralph
Clark, Don Mcinnis, James Jackman, and
Donald Saltarelli
Francis Glockner
Laurence Schmit (Chairman), Henry Duke, and
Norma Gibbs ·
None
6/11/75
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne
Sylvester, Secretary, Ray Lewis, William
Clarke, John Thomas, Bruce Taylor, Rita
Brown, Hilary Eitzen, Buford McDaniel,
Gene Bell, and Ted Francis
Director Carolyn Ewing, Director Gilbert
Arbiso, Jr., Thomas L. Woodruff, General
Counsel, Conrad Hohener, Harvey Hunt, Jack
Kenney, Donald Martinson, Ed Just, Al Eddows,
Jeanne Eddows, Norman Card, and Gordon Cooper
· A regular meeting of the Boards ~f Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and. 11 of Orange County, California, was held at 7:30 p.m.
Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation, the roll was called and the
Secretary reported a quorum present for each District's Board.
* * * * * * * * * * *
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 14, 1975, and the adjourned regular meeting held May 29, 1975, be
approved as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 14, 1975, and the adjourned rcgufor meetb.g held May 29, 1975, be
approved as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 14, 1975, and the adjourned regular meeting held May 29, 1975, be
approved as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
AEEroval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 14, 1975' and the adjourned regular meeting held May 29, 1975, be
approved as mailed.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
AEEroval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 14, 1975, and the adjourned regular meeting held May 29, 1975, be
approved as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
AEEroval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 14, 1975, and the adjourned regular meeting held May 29, 1975, be
approved as mailed.
-2-
. ..
.,
6/11/75
DISTRICT 11
Approval of minutes
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the minutes of the regular meeting held
May 14, 1975, and the adjourned regular meeting held May 29, 1975, be approved
as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the
Joint Chairman
Joint Chairman Winn reported that he had
received a conununication from Win Adams,
Chairman of the State Water Resources
Control Board regarding the State's
participation in the proposed committee of locally-elected officials
representing the TRI-TAC organizations and the County Board of Supervisors
Association for the purpose of reviewing proposed regulations involving policy
matters affecting local entities. Chairman Winn also advised that he and the
General Manager were drafting guidelines and by-laws for the corrJnittee.
Directors will be kept apprised of future developments.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the
General Manager
Directors contact him if they had
the agenda format or procedures.
The General Manager briefly reviewed
changes in the agenda format and advised
of other changes which would be made in
the future. He further requested that
other suggestions with regard to improving
Mr. Harper reported that the issue of granting the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency discretionary authority with regard to
reducing the secondary treatment requirements of the 1972 Amendments to the
Water Pollution Control Act was not yet dead, and referred the Boards to a
copy of a letter in the Directors' meeting folders addressed to Gordon Wood,
a staff member of the House Committee on Public Works and Transportation in
this regard.
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing new 90-day
agreement with Jeanne L~
Eddows re sale of digested
sewage solids
The General Counsel reported that pursuant
to the action of the Boards at their
adjourned meeting on May 29th, he and
the staff had met with Jeanne Eddo~s, dba
Alart Company, and the firm's General
Manager, Norman Card, regarding a 30-day
agreement incorporating those terms and conditions established by the Boards
on May 29th. Alart Company indicated that they could not meet the terms and
conditions of a 30-day contract;· and as a result, a new agreement has not been
executed. Mr. Woodruff reported that it was the consensus of the staff that
perhaps a 90-day contract would be more feasible and allow sufficient time to
evaluate the capabilities of Alart Company with regard to processing and
removal of sludge from Treatment Plant No. 2. The General Counsel reported
that he had drafted an agreement for a 90-day contract incorporating the
conditions previously established by the Boards in the event the Directors
might wish to consider same.
-3-
6/11/75
The new draft agreement has been reviewed ~ith representatives of Alart
Company who, up until fifteen minutes prior to the Board meeting, had
indicated very little chance of coming to terms. TI1ey have now advised
that the draft agreement, subject to a few changes concurred in by the
General Counsel, is now acceptable to Jeanne Eddows. 1be General Counsel
then reviewed the changes proposed by Alart Company, one of whi~h would be
to delete all reference to "dba.Alart Company" and refer only to Jeanne
Eddows in the contract documents. Another requested provision was for a
clause to award a long-term contract upon successful performance under the
90-day agreement. Mr. Woodruff stated that this was a matter of Board policy
and sought direction in that regard.
Following a review of the remaining proposed changes, the Boards discussed
the feasibility of entering into the proposed 90-day agreement, the
ramifications thereof, and the matter of measuring performance capabilities
of the contractor. The Boards also discussed the provision in the original
contract for a drying operation which had specifically been omitted from
the proposed new agreement, pending determination of the contractor's
demonstrated ability to perform.
It was then moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That execution of a new agreement with Jeanne L. Eddows for sale of digested
solids, to be for a period of 90 days, be authorized in _a form approved by
the General Counsel, with no provision regarding the establishment of a
drying system. The terms of a possible long-term agreement should be
negotiated by staff and presented to the Boards for consideration prior to
the expiration of the 90-day agreement.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of Special Committee on
Industrial Waste Ordinance,
and authorizing staff to conduct
informal meetings re modified
user charge revenue system
Director Duke, Chairman of the Special
Committee on Industrial Waste Ordinance,
reviewed the written report and recommenda-
tion of the Special Committee. The
Committee considered six alternatives for
the capital recovery provision of the
ordinance and discussed the advantages
and disadvantages of the various alternatives. Chairman Duke noted that
representatives from the industrial community attended the meeting of the
Special Committee and participated in their deliberations.
The Committee recommends that the modified user charge, Alternate No. 5 in
the Committee's report dated June 5, 1975, which continues to utilize
ad valorem taxes as the major source of revenue but collects maintenance and
operating costs, plus a fixed capital recovery charge, from dischargers ·.
exceeding 2-1/2 million gallons per year, as it appears to provide substantial
equity among users as well as promote water coriservation. Credits would be
allowed for ad valorem taxes paid the Districts. The Committee further
recommended that the Boards authorize the Districts' staff to hold informal
hearings on the proposed modified user charge revenue system.
-4-
6/11/75
The Directors then entered into a lengthy discussion concerning the
Committee's report ~nd the alternatives considered therein, following which
it was moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff be authorized to hold informal hearings with representatives
of the Chambers of Conunerce and the industrial community for their input and
reaction to a modified user charge revenue system, as recommended in the
Report of the Special Committee on Industrial Waste Ordinance dated June S, 1975.
ALL DISTRICTS
Certification of the
General Manager received
and ordered filed
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the certification of the General
Manager that he has checked all bills
appearing on the agenda, found them to
be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment, be received
and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Approval of Joint Operating
and Capital Outlay Revolving
Fund check registers
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Districts' Joint Operating and
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund accounts
payable check registers be approved for
signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and that the County Auditor be
authorized and directed to pay:
Joint Operating
Capital Outlay Revolving
$ 266,567.76
1,669,079.25
$1,935,647.01
in accordance with the claims listed on pages "I-1" through "l-5", attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of check registers
That the District's Operating Fund and
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund accounts payable check registers be approved
for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and
directed to pay:
Operating Fund
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund
$ 4,635.45
324,002.78
$328,638.23
in accordance with the claims listed on page "II", attached hereto and made
a part of these minutes.
-5-
6/11/75
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of check register
That the District's Accumulated Capital
Outlay Fund accounts payable check register be approved for signature of the
Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay
$623, 190.99, in accordance with the claims listed on Page "II",· attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT S Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of check register
That the District's Operating rund
accounts payable check register be approved for signature of the Chairman,
and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $85.00, in
accordance with the claims listed on Page "Il-1", attached hereto and made
a part of these minutes.
DISTRICTS S & 6 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of Suspense Fund
check register That the Districts' Suspense Fund accounts
payable check register be approved for
signature of the Chairman of District No. 5, and that the County Auditor be
authorized and directed to pay $60.35, in accordance with the claims listed
on Page "II-1", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of check registers
That the District's Operating Fund and
Facilities Revolving Fund acco1mts payable check registers be approved for
signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and
directed to pay:
Operating Fund $ 85.00
Facilities Revolving Fund 150,593.66
$150,678.66
in accordance with the warrants listed on Page "III", attached hereto and
made a part of these, minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Resolution determining
prevailing wage rates That the Boards of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 75-85, ascertaining and
determining the prevailing rates of wages to be paid to all workmen employed
on public works contracts within the Districts until the amendment or
revocation of this resolution; and rescinding Resolution No. 74-80.
Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes.
-6-
..
~ , .
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving agreement with
County of Orange for
in-place density tests
6/11/75
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
'Ibat the Boards of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 75-86, approving agreement
with the County of Orange for 1975-76
in-place density tests to determine relative compaction of sewer trench
backfill. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing General Manager
to designate members of the
Boa~ds and/or staff to attend
meetings; and authorizing
reimbursement therefor
his opinion, will be of value to
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the General Manager be authorized to
designate members of the Boards and/or
staff to attend meetings, conferences,
facility inspections, and other functions
within the State of California, which, in
the Districts; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for expenses incurred in connection with
said attendance is hereby authorized to be made.
ALL DISTRICTS
Accepting proposal of
Smith-Emery Company for
in-process pipe testing
for 1975-76
agreement, be received, ordered
ALL DISTRICTS
Awarding sale of Digested
Sewage Sludge, Specification
No. S-013
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the proposal from Smith-Emery Company
dated June 3, 1975, for in-process pipe
testing for the 1975-76 fiscal year, at
no price increase over the current year's
filed, approved, and accepted.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the bid tabulation and recommendation
for Sale of Digested Sewage Sludge,
Specification No. S-013, be received and
ordered filed, and that the General Manager be authorized to award sale of
said sludge to Soil Mix, Inc. at the unit price of $2.10 per cubic yard.
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving Change Order No. 1
to the plans and specifications
for Job Ko. PW-035
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Additional Boiler
Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-035,
authorizing an addition of $1,474.76 for additional boiler piping, and granting
an extension of time of 276 calendar days required to reorder the boiler from
another supplier, to the contract with Porter B.oiler Service, Inc., be
approved. Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes.
-7-
6/11/75
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Accepting Job No. PW-035
as complete That the Boards of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 75-88, accepting Additional
Boiler Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job.No. PW-035, as complete; authorizing
execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement.
Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
~proving Change Order No. 1
to the plans and specifications
for Job ~o. P2-20
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Power Reliability
Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-20,
granting a time extension of 714 days to the contract with Mel Gorham
Electric Company; and adding additional equipment and flooring revisions
in the amount of $2,218.39, and deducting for Districts' force account
work to complete said job in the amount of $5,348.64, for a net deduction
of $2,630.25 from said contract, be approved. Copy of this change order is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
• Accepting Job No. P2-20
as complete That the Boards of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 75-89, accepting Power
Reliability Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-20, as complete; authorizing
execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement.
Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Awarding contract for Pumps and
Drive Units for the Additional
Pumping Facilities at the Ocean
Outfall Pumping Station, Plant
No. 2, Job No. J-6-lB
The General Counsel reported that both
bidders submitting proposals for Pumps
and Drive Units for Additional Pumping
Facilities at the Ocean Outfall Pumping
Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-lB,
had taken exception to the provision in
the specifications which imposes a
penalty for late delivery. The staff is of the opinion that because the
contractor would not receive payments until delivery of the equipment, at
which time an 8090 payment would be made with the balance being due upon
successful operation of said equipment, sufficient encouragement is provided
for delivery in accordance with the specifications.
111e Boards then entered into a discussion concerning the propriety of waiving
the penalty clause for late delivery, following which it was moved, seconded,
and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-87, to receive and file
bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Pumps and Drive
Units for the Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall Pumping
Station, Plant No. 2, Huntington Beach California, Job Ko. J-6-lB, to
Mccalla Bros. in the amount of $345,000.00; and,
-8-
6/11/75
FURTHER MOVED: 1bat waiver of the provision in the specifications for
said job regarding penalties for late delivery, be approved.
Certified copy of Resolution No. 75-87 is attached hereto and made a part
of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Verbal report of
Executive Committee
The Joint Chairman reported briefly on
the Executive Committee meetings of
~~ay 29th and June 11th, immediately
preceding the Joint Board meetings of
those dates, and advised the Boards that the major items of consideration
were the agreement with Jeanne L. Eddows, dba Alart Company, and the proposed
Joint Works Budget and Personnel Recommendations for fiscal 1975-76.
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving 1975-76 personnel
and joint works budgets
The Director of Finance reviewed the
1975-76 joint works budget recommendations,
and sununarized the anticipated Districts'
budgetary requirements for the fiscal
year which will be
meeting in August.
actions were taken:
considered by the respective Boards at their regular joint
After a brief discussion by the Boards, the following
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving 1975-76
personnel requirements;
and adopting Positions
and Salaries Resolution
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the 1975-76 personnel requirements
be approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: Tiiat the Hoards of
Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-96, amending Positions and Salaries
Resolution No. 75-17, establishing employee positions, fixing salaries
therefor, and authorizing employment of personnel. Certified copy
of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried by the
following roll call vote: .~proval of Joint Operating
Fund Budget for the 1975-76
fiscal year AYES: Directors Amo, Battin, Burton,
Byrne, Callahan, Chaput, Clark, Cox,
Culver, Davis, Mclnnis, Duke, Evans, Fox, Frankiewich, Garthe, Gibbs,
Graham, Jackman, Kaywood, MacKain, Perry, Riley, Rima, Rogers,
Saltarelli, Schmit, Scott, Shipley, Store, Temple, Ward, Weishaupt,
Winn, Wood, and Young
NOES: None
ABSENT: Directors Glockner, McKnew, and Svalstad
That the Joint Operating Fund Budget of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, for the 1975-76 fiscal year, be adopted
in the total amount of $5,082,326.
-9-
6/11/75
ALL DISTRICTS
Approval of Capital Outlay
Revolving Fund Budget for
the 1975-76 fiscal year
Moved, seconded, and duly carried by
roll ca 11 vote:
AYES: Directors Arno, Battin, Burton,
Byrne, Callahan, Chaput, Clark, Cox,
Culver, Davis, Mcinnis, Duke, Evans, Fox, Frankiewich, Garthe, Gibbs,
Graham, Jackman, Kaywood, t-1acKain, Perry, Riley, Rima, Rogers,
Saltarelli, Schmit, Scott, Shipley, Store, Temple, Ward, Weishaupt,
Winn, Wood, and Young
NOES: None
ABSENT: Directors Glockner, McKnew, and Svalstad
That the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7, and ·11, for the 1975-76 fiscal year,
be approved in the total amount of $26,033,000.
ALL DISTRICTS
Allthorizing drafting of
deferred compensation plan
reviewed the provisions and
The General Counsel reported on the
proposed deferred compensation plan for
management and supervisory personnel and
the purpose therefor. He also briefly
administrative procedures regarding such a plan.
It was then moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the General Counsel be authorized to prepare necessary documents for
implementation c~nd administ:ration of a deferred compensation plan for
management and supervisory personnel.
ALL DISTRICTS
Annual nominations for
Chairrr.an of the Joint
Administrative Organization
This being the annual meeting fixed by
the Boards at which nominations are to
be made for the office of Chairman of
the Joint Administrative Organization,
the Secretary declared nominations open.
Director Donald Winn was nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairrean
of the Joint Administrative Organization. There being no further nominations,
the Secretary declared nominations closed, and reported that the election would
be held at the regular July meeting in accordance with the Boards' Rules of
Procedures for the Conduct of Business.
-10-
ALL DISTRICTS
Annual nominations for
Vice Chairman of the Joint
Administrative Organization
6/11/75
This being the annual meeting fixed by
the Boards at which nominations arc to be
made for the office of Vice Chairman of
the Joint Administrative Organization, the
Secretary declared nominations open.
Director Norma Gibbs was nominated as a candidate for the office of Vice
Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. There being no further
nominations, the Secretary declared nominations closed, and reported that
the election would be held at the regular July meeting in accordance. with the
Boards' Rules of Procedure for the Conduct of Business.
DISTRICT 1
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:51 p.m., June 25, 1975.
DISTRICT 3
Approving Addendum No. 1
to the plans and specifications
for Contract No. 3-21-1
Portion of 27, Contract No.
is on file in the off ice of
DISTRICT 3
Awarding contract for
Westside Relief Interceptor,
Reaches 25, 26 and Portion of
27, Contract No. 3-21-1
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
11lat Addendum No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Westside Relief
·Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26, and
3-21-1, be approved. A copy of the addendum
the Secretary of the Distric~s.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution
No. 75-90-3, to receive and file bid
tabulation and recommendation, and awarding
contract for Westside Relief Interceptor,
Reaches 25, 26 and Portion of 27, Contract No. 3-21-1, to A. G. Tutor, Co.,
Inc. & N. M. Saliba Co., in the amount of $1,416,448.00. Certified copy of
this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 3
Approving Change Order No. 12
to the plans and specifications
for Contract No. 3-18
an addition of $4,500.92 for
A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. and N.
Copy of this change order is
DISTRICT 3
Receive, file, and deny
claim of General Telephone
Co_Elpany re Contract No. 3-18,
and refer to liability insurance
carrier
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 12 to the plans and
specifications for Knott Interceptor,
Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18, authorizing
additional rock bedding, to the contract with
M. Saliba Co., a Joint Venture, be approved.
attac~1ed hereto and made a part of these minutes.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
TI1at the claim submitted by Genera 1
Telephone Company of California, dated
June 6, 1975, in the amount of $2,070.57,
relative to the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4,
Contract No. 3-18, be received, ordered
filed, and denied, and referred to the District's liability insurance carrier
as recommended by the General Counsel.
-11-
6/11/75
DISTRICT 3
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 8:52 p.m., June 11, 1975.
DISTRICT 5
Approving Change Order No ._l_
to the plans and specifica-
tions for Contract No. 5-14R-6
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
111at Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Wet Well Repair and
Remodeling at 14th Street and 11 A" Street
P~~ing Stations, Contract No. 5-14R-6, approving a deduction of $4,960.36
from the contract with Rewes-Schock, JV, due to changes in construction
methods, be approved. Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made
a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5
Ordering annexation of
territory to the District
(Annexation No. 6)
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Standard Resolution No. 75-91-5, ordering
annexation of approximately 6.29 acres
to the District in the vicinity of the San Joaquin Reservoir (Annexatjon Ko. 6
Harbor View IIills, Sector IV, Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 5).
Certified copy of this resolution is ~ttachcd hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICT S
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 8:52 p.m., June 11, 1975.
DISTRICT 6
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 8:52 p.m., June 11, 1975.
DISTRICT 11
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 8:53 p.m., June 11, 1975.
DISTRICT 2
Approving Change Order No. 2
to the plans and specifica-
tions for Contract No. 2-17-1
Moved, seccinded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and
specifications for Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive
Interceptor Sewer, Reach 1, Contract No.
2-17-1, approving a deduction of $4,960.00 from the contract with Bebek
Company due to deletion of items 14 and 15 from said contract as requested
by Yorba Linda County Water District, be approved. Copy of this Change Order
is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
-12-
DISTRICT 2
Receive and file consulting
engineer's report re
Contract No. 2-16-2
6/11/75
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the report of the consulting engineer
dated June 5, 1975, regarding abandonment
of portion of Yorba Linda Force Main under
Orange Freeway in connection with construction of Yorba Linda Force Main,
Contract No. 2-16-2, be received and ordered filed.
DISTRICT 2
Receive, file, and accept
proposal of Lowry & Associates
for design of force main section
re Contract No. 2-16-2
of Yorba Linda Force Main, Contract
and accepted; and, ·
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Tilat the proposal of Lowry & Associates,
dated May 23, 1975, for design of new
force main section under the Orange
Freeway in connection with construction
No. 2-16-2, be received, ordered filed,
FURTiiER MOVED: Tilat the General Manager be authorized to direct the engineer
to proceed with design of said force main section for a lump sum fee of $4,200.
DISTRICT 2
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. Tile Chairman
then declared the meeting ·so adjourned at 8:53 p.m., June 11, 1975.
DISTRICT 7
Ordering annexation of
territory to the District
(Annexation No. 44)
Following a brief report by the Chief
Engineer, it was move<l, seconded, and
duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt Standard
Resolution No. 75-92-7, ordering annexation of approximately 1 acre to the
District in the vicinity of Cowan Heights Drive and Sirrine Drive (Annexation
No. 44 -Ursino Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Certified
copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7
Authorizing initiation of
proceedings re Annexation
No. 47
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the .Board of Directors adopt Standard
Resolution No. 75-93-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex
approximately 1 acre of territory to the District in the vicinity of Rangeview
Drive and Brier Lane (Proposed Annexation No. 47 -Rauch Annexation to County
Sanitation District No. 7). Certified copy of this resolution is attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7
Receive and file letter
1rom Eddie Nahigan requesting
annexation of territory, and
refer to staff
be received, ordered filed,
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the letter from Eddie Nahigan requesting
annexation of approximately 6.934 acres
of territory to the District in the
vicinity of Overhill and Miravista Drive,
and referred to staff for study and recommendation.
-13-
6/11/75
DISTRICT 7
Approving agreement with
Irvine Ranch Water District
re Annexation No. 39
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 75-94-7, approving agreement
with Irvine Ranch Water District, in
form approved by the General Counsel, to operate and maintain the local
sewer collection system within the 176-acre residential area excluded from
Annexation No. 39 -Irvine Industrial Annexation to County Sanitation
District No. 7, pursuant to the conditions established for said annexation.
Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes. •
DISTRICT 7
Ordering annexation of
territory to the District
(Annexation No. 39)
Moved, seconded, and d.uly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution
No. 75-95-7, ordering annexation of
approximately 316 acres to the District
in the area generally bounded by the Santa Ana Freeway, Jamboree Road,
Santa Fe Railroad and Myford Road (Annexation No. 39 -Irvine Industrial
Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Certified copy of this
resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7
Receive, file, and accept
proposal of Boyle Engineering
Corporation for engineering
services re Contracts Nos. 7-6-8
rmd 7-6-9
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the proposal of Boyle Engineering
Corporation dated June 2, 1975, for
engineering services in connection with
preparation of plans and specifications
for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion
of Reach 12, Reach 13 and Portion of Reach 14, Contract No. 7-6-8, and
Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 and 16,
Contract No. 7-6-9, for a total fee of $59,172.00, less a credit for
preliminary engineering study fees in the amount of $5,474.00, for a total
net fee of $53,698.00, be received, ordered filed, and accepted; and,
FURTIIER MOVED: TI1at the General Manager be authorized to direct the
engineers to proceed with said services; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That work such as field surveying for plan prepa~ation and
construction staking, is hereby authorized to be made at the follo~ing rates:
Three-man survey party
Two-man survey party
Licensed surveyor
$60/hour
48/hour
22/hour
DISTRICT 7
Receive and file report
of Goode & Goode re
Contract No. 7-6-7
Pacific Railroad Company in
Trunk Sewer, Reach 11 and a
received and ordered filed.
Moved, sec~nded, and duly carried:
That the report of Goode & Goode, dated
June S, 1975, re appraisal of right of
way to be acquired from the Southern
connection with construction of the Tustin-Orange
Portion of Reach 12, Contract No. 7-6-7, be
-14-
. llL
DISTRICT 7
Declaring intent to accept
Grant of Easement from
Southern Pacific Railroad
Company
offer dated May 29, 1975, for an
approved by the General Counsel.
DISTRICT 7
Adjournment
6/11/75
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors declare
their intent to accept a Grant of Easement
from Southern Pacific Railroad Company in
accordance with the terms of the District's
amount not to exceed $50,000, in form
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:54 p.m., June 11, 1975.
-15-
of Directors,
n Districts Nos. 1,
11
',..
WARRANT NO.
~049
26050
·26051
'26052
.26053
26054
26055
26056
26057
26058
26059
26060
26061
26062
26063
26064
26065
26066
26067
26068
26069
' 26070
, 26071
26072
26073
26074
26075
26076
26077
26078
26079
26080
26081
26082
26083
26084
26085
26086
2-6087
26088
26089
26090
{ 2b091
I 26092
26093
26094
) . 26095
26096
26097
??1098
·~J99 20100
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Advance Sales & Service, Truck Parts $
Alex Fish Company, Ecological Research Supplies
All Bearing Service, Inc., Seals & Bearings
Amac Equipment Co., Switches
City of Anaheim, Power
Anaheim Sewer Construction, Lateral Repair
The Anchor Packing Co., Gaskets & Pump Packing
Artesia Implements & Parts Co., Equipment Rental
Banning Battery Company, Batteries
Beckman Instruments, Metering & Lab Supplies
Bell Pipe & Supply Company, Valves & Pipe Supplies
Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair
Bender Machine, Inc., Compressor Repair
Bird Machine, Centrifuge Parts
Blair Paving, Inc., Paving
Borg-Warner Industrial Drives, Pump Parts
Brenner-Fielder & Associates, Inc., Compressor Parts
Broadlicks Art Supply, Drafting Supplies
Brookhurst Dodge, Truck Parts
Bruner & Lay, Tools
C & R Reconditioning Company, Compressor Repair
CS Company, Valves & Compressor Parts
Cal-State Seal Company, Seals
Cal 1 s Cameras, Photo Supplies & Processing
CASA, Executive Meeting Registration
California DiGtributors, Equipment Parts
R. T. Campbell Co., Filters
John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Service, JPL Plant
Castle Controls, Inc., Controls
Coast Insurance Agency, Auto Insurance Fremium
College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials
Conneaut Metallic Packing Co., Pump Packing
Consolidated Electric Distbrs., Electric Suplies
Consolidated Bolt & Nut Co., Hardware
Constructor's Supply Co., Tools
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
County of Orange, Printing
Crest Leasing, Vehicle Lea~e
Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplies
Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage
Daily Pilot, Bid Notice S-013
C. R. Thtvis Supply Co., Hose
De Guelle & Sons Glass Co., Glass
Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling
Nick Di Benedetto, Employee Mileage
Ida L. Duesberg, Employee Mileage
Duncan Hunter Co., Hose
Eastman, Inc., Printing & Office Supplies
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring
Fischer & Porter Company, Metering Supplies & Pump Parts
Flippen Mfg. Co., Equipment Parts
City of Fountain Valley, Water
I-1
AMOUNT
267.80
53.00
97.20
1,059.26
83.46
150.00
516.31
200.00
253.76
527.51
447.32
19.00
165.78
3,745.61
240.00
107.00
335.47
15.64
14.87
31.09
210.00
927.57
117.93
339.16
15.00
132.16
69.20
17,171.01
259.10
180.00
44.97
22.07
1,546.16
672.22
140.70
531.45
28.80
147. 28
40.00
67.44
9.11
548.61
33.41
100.00
24.90
18.45
203.52
994.49
3,000.00
642.72
34.38
40.00
WARRANT NO.
26101
2bl02
26103
26104
26105
26106
26107
26108
26109
26110
2blll
26112
26113
26114
26115
2bll6
. 2b117
26118
2bll9
26120
26121
26122
2bl23
26124
26125
. 2"6126
26127
26128
26129
2bl30
26131
2bl32
26133
26134
26135
2bl36
26137
26138
26139
26140
26141
26142
26143
26144
26145
26146
26147
2bl48
26149
26150
26151
26152
26153
26154
26155
26156
IN FAVOR OF
France Products Division, Compressor Parts
Furane Plastic, Inc., Hardware
Garden Grove Lumber & Cement Co., Building Materials
Garrett Industrial Supply Co., Equipment Cabinets
General Electric Supply, Electric Supplies
Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine Contract 1-1-75
General Telephone Company of California
Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage
Goldenwest Fertilizer Co., Grit Removal
Graybar Electric Company, Electric Supplies
L. C. Gysin, Employee Mileage
Fred A. Harper, EPA Meeting Expense
Halsted & Hoggan, Inc., Pump Parts
Harrington Industrial Plastics, Pipe Supplies
Harrisons & Crosfield, JPL Chemicals
Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal .
Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease
Holiday Inn of Somerville, Lodging JPL
Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires
Honeywell, Inc., Strip Charts
Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies & Tools
City of Huntington Beach, Water
Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Equipment Rental
Huntington Labs, Lab Supplies
ICN Life Sciences Group, Lab Supplies
Industrial Asphalt, Paving Materials
Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware
Internatj.onal Business Machines, Office Supplies
International Harvester Co., Truck Parts
Irvine Ranch Water District, Water
Jensen Instrument Company, Instrumentation Supplies
Jensen Tools & Alloys, Tools
Justin PaQific Corp., Centrifuge Parts
Kahl Scientific Instrument Corp., Lab Supplies
Keenan PiEe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies
Kelly Pipe Company, Pipe Supplies
Kenron Industrial Supply, Tools
King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, V-Belts & Hardware
Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts
Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies
Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware & Tools
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Hardware & Tool Repair
L & N Uniforms Supply Co.,·Uniform Service
The Lacal Company, Inc., Seals
Judy Lee, Employee Mileage
Los Angeles Times, Annual Subscription
R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., Paving Materials
McCoy Ford, Truck Parts
McCoy Ford Tractor, Tractor Parts
McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Controls & Hose
Manning Enviromentals Corp., Test Equipment
Ann Martin, Employee Mileage
Master Blueprint & Supply, Printing
Metal Finishing, Technical Journal
Mine Safety Appliances Co., Safety Equipment
Missimers·Incorporated, Hardware
I-2
$
AMOUNT
669.10
132.09
261.56
186.71
121.18
6,335.20
305.16
6.75
3,159.00
201.31
10.05
24 .45
534.34
98.80
13,088.88
210.00
429.08
101.89
87.09
77.29
1,.121. 09
9.11
80. 76
122.47
65.02
9.22
245.90
152.64
162.36
2.05
655.80
233.70
3,419.56
139.30
392.34
466.02
36lt.71
767.59
3,319.02
4olt .J4 3
209.98
273.00
3,095.81
64.24
17.85
42.00
306.17
130.10
351.98
380.71
28.20
24 .54
107.01
8.oo
90.61
327.36
WARRANT NO.
26157
-158
~159
26160
·26161
. 26162
26163
·26164
I 26165
26166
26167
26168
26169
26170
26171
26172
26173
26174
26175
2bl76
26177
26178
26179
26180
26181
26182
26183
26184
26185
26186
26187
26188
26189
26190
26191
26192
26193
26194
26195
26196
26197
.26198
26199
26200
26201
26202
26203
26204
2b205
. 26206
26207
?f>208
209 ~210
IN FAVOR OF
Montgomery Brothers, Inc., Pump Parts $
Moore Business Forms, Inc., Paper
E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers
Morrison Company, Pipe Supplies
Musick, Peeler & Garrett, Special La.bor Counsel
Nalco Chemical Company, Chemicals
National Chemsearch, Chemicals
National Lumber Supply, Hardware, Tools & Bldg. Mat'ls
City of Newp0rt Beach, Water
Newporter Inn, Lodging
Occidental College, Ecological Trawl
Orange County Appliance Parts, Valve
Orange County Brake, Truck.Repair
Orange County Chemical Co., Blueprint Supplies
Orange County Stamp Co., Office Supplies
Orange Paper Products, Inc., Hardware
Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies
Pacific Telephone Company
Parks Crane Service, Inc., Crane Rental
M. c. Patten Corporation, Pump Parts
Perkin-Elmer, Lab Supplies
Petroleum Dynamics, Engine Parts
Pro-Tech, Inc., Sampling Equipment
Porter Boiler Service, Inc., Boiler Parts & Gaskets
Postma.ster, Postage
Premium Rubber Company, Hose
Quaiity Building Supply, Building Materials
REA Express, JPL Freight
Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal
Red Valve Company, Inc., Valve
Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts
Ruff's Saw Service, Saw Sharpening
S & C Electric Company, Electric Supplies
Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motor & Motor~Repair
Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies
Science Applications, Inc., Hazard Waste Study
Scientific Products, Lab Supplies
City of Seal Beach, Water
Seal Methods, Inc., Gasket Material
Security Industrial Supply Co., Pipe Supplies & Valve
See Optics, Safety Glasses
Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies
John Sigler, Employee Mileage
Signal-Flash Company, Barricade Rental
Sims Industrial Supply, Hardware
Fred Sinasek, Employee Mileage
Snow-Gates & Valves, Steel Gates
Southern California Edison Company
South Orange Supply, Piping Supplies
So. Calif. Coastal Water Research Project Authority,
Share of 75-76 Budget (Resolution 75-64)
Southern California Gas Company
Southern California Water Company
Southern Marine Supply, Hose
I-3
AMOUNT
76.50
111.94
562.02
819.91
1,701.29
582.84
778.31
224.30
5.00
41.74
400.00
9g.48
259.50
102.40
106.69
127.20
43. 97
461.46
216.00
127.29
276.63
345.92
121. 00
72 .40
750.00
190.16
154.23
725.51
62.00
102.37
349. 45
31.50
2,778.69
50.61
699.10
301.84
1,000.00
22.54
8.80
230.00
2,898.93
53.27
296.97
40.26
26.00
106.00
38 .46
6,360.00
50,885.39
47.90
79,600.00
1,312.15
3.00
65.72
.l
WARRANT NO.
26211
26212
26213
26214
26215
26216
26217
26218
26219
26220
26221
26222
26223
26224
26225
.. 26226
26227
26228
26229
26230
26231
26232
26233
26234
2.6235
26236
26237
26238
26239
26240
26241
26242
26243
26244
26245
26246
26247
26248
26249
26250
26251
26264
IN FAVOR OF
Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water $
Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Standard Oil Company of Calif., Oil, Gasoline & Diesel
Stang Hydronics, Inc., Hardware
Sully Miller Contracting Co., Paving Materials
Sun Electric Corporation, Electrical Repair
J. Wayne Sylvester, Dir. of Finance, Petty Cash Reimb.
T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Truck Parts
Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage
Taylor-Th1nn, Equipment Parts
39 Stake & Building Supplies, Survey Supplies
Thomas Bros. Maps, Trunk Maps
Trade Paper Company, Mailing Supplies
Truck & Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts
E. F. Tucker, Specification Supplies
United Auto Parts, Truck Parts
United Parcel Service, Freight-Out
United Reprographics, Inc., Printing
U. s. Dept. of Commerce -NTLS, Technical Journal
United States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts
Utilities Supply Company, Tools
Van Waters & Rogers, Odor Control Chemicals
Versa-Tech Development Corp., JPL Testing
Paul Vukich, Employee Mileage
Wagner Hydraulic Equipment Co., Pump Pa.rts
Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage
John R. Waples, R. s., Odor Consultant
Warren and Bailey Co., Inc., Compressor Parts
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts
West-Print, Brochure Printing
Western Highway Products, Inc., Safety Signs
Western Salt Company, Salt
Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Supplies
Russell Wold, Employee Mileage
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
World Travel Bureau, Inc., Air Fare, Various Mtgs.
Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage
John M. Wright, Employee Mileage
Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing
Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Services
Donald Winn, Jt. Chairman Meeting Expenses
C. Arthur Nissan, Legal Counsel
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING
I-4
AMOUNT
86.50
358. 3li
3,520.64 ~
85.86
254.43
80.60
420.96
199.17
43.50
48.67
37.26
2,423.42
89.99
1J47.05
172.30
33.12
36.30
218.47
75.00
1,591.13
75.68
6,237.88
2,409.55
21.00
39.05
34.38
222.90
2e6.20
740.66
58.35
36.65
162.38
868.35
35.22
3,030.50
25.75
5~.38
62. 4.o
2,232.80
1,626.93
222.93
730.00
WARRANT NO.
~037
2b038
'26039
. 26040
26041
'2601~2
' 26043
26044
26045
26046
26047
26048
26049
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16
Engineers Sales-Service Co., Pumps
Forkert Engineering, Survey Pl-16
Foster-Barker, Communication Equipment
Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Mgmt. Pl-16
McCoy Ford, Truck A-074
McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Chain Hoist
Porter Boiler Service, Inc., Contractor PW-035
Smith Emery Company, Testing Pl-16
Southern Calif. Testing Lab, Testing Pl-16
Tektronix, Inc., Instrumentation Test Equipment
Twining Laboratories, Testing Pl-16
Industrial Indemnity Co., Assignee of Mel Gorham,
Contractor P2-20
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF
I-5
AMOUNT
$ 1,587,094.19
7,155.00
300.00
380.50
12' 031. 44
A 6 ,,. 2Q, L 5 • 7b
281.59
1,327.28
936.00
333.72
2,149.40
300.00
35,933.37
$ 1,669,079.25
$ 1,935,647.01
DISTRICT NO. 2
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
26012 Clifford Forkert, Right-of-way Services
26013
26014
260l5
26016
26017
26018
26019
26020
26021
26022
26023
26024
26025
26026
26027
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Bebek Company, Contractor 2-17-1
County of Orange, Compaction Testing 2-17-2
Mark Dakovich, Inc., Contractor 2-12R & 2-17-2
J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation, Contractor 2-15
Lowry and Associates, Engineering Services, 2 14-4, 2-14-5,
2-15, 2-16-1, 2-17-1, 2-17-2, 2-18
Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 2-16-1, 2-17-1
Southern California Testing Laboratory, Soils Testing 2-15
2-17-2
S. S. Zarubica, Contractor 2-18
DISTRICT NO. 3
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOF OF
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 3-18, 3-19, 3-20-1
3-20-2, 3-21-2
County of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-20-1
Mike Prlich & Sons, Contractor 3-19
The Register, Notice 3-21-1
Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 3-20-1, 3-20-2
Sully-Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 3-20-1
A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Saliba, Contractor 3-18 &
II
3-20-2
AMOUNT:
$ 4,635.45.
$ 149,304.60
221.40
125,405.00
16,906.84
24,686.00
494.00
363.94
62621.00
$ 3242002.78
$ 3 2 8 2 6 3 8 . 2 3.
$ 25,251.95
116.02
15,206.00
91.75
3,991.00
536,830.20
412704.07
$ 6232190.99
DISTRICT NO. 5
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
~ARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
26028 State of California, Processing Fee, Annexation 6
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6
SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
26036 Daily Pilot, Bid Notice 5-14R-6
II-1
$
$
AMOUNT
85.00
60.35
DISTRICT NO. 7
WARRANT NO.
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
26029 State of California, Processing Fee, Annexation 44
26030
26031
26032
26033
26034
26035
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 7-6-6
County of Orange, Compaction Testing 7-6-6
Goode & Goode Appraisers, Appraisal 7-6-7
McGuire Construction, Inc., Contractor 7-6-6
Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 7-6-6
George W. and Harriet Willis, Easement 7-6-6
III
AMOUNT·
$ 85.00
$ 1,250.00
210.76
3,7'15.00
145,188.90
104.00
65.00
$ 1502593.66
$ 150,678.66
S(a) Report of the Joint Chairman
Winn advised that he received a
concerning their intent to work
we have proposed. Read letter.
Will keep Directors informed as
#6(b) Report of the General Manager
JUNE 11, 1975 JOINT MrG.
letter from Win Adams, Chairman of the SWRCB,
with us on the formation of the committee that
Said Mr. Harper and he suggested some guidelines.
this develops.
Mr. Harper first asked the Directors to note some changes in the agenda. All of
the bills are together now. Pulled out construction reports which were on agenda
before and have compiled them into one single report to be given to Directors each
month. Said he has already received some suggestions re getting maps on same side
of paper as reports and will be making other improvements. Said we would appreciate
any comments that Directors might have at any time. Said it also has been suggested
that we get a little better indexing method regarding supporting material. Will make
that change.
Reported that we have received good news regarding secondary treatment for ocean
discharge. Referred to letter to Gordon Wood in Directors' folders. Are going to
hold some hearings relative to amendments to compliance dates re Pl 92-500. Are
considering changing to July, 1977 date that all publicly-owned treatment works
will have to have secondary treatment, and giving Administrator authority to
change this on a case-to-case basis primarily because ftmding hasn't been available.
They now believe we should have the time to study the situation and looking at each
site where discharge is occurring as to what type of treatment should be made. EPA
is holding some hearings on the 19th of this month in San Francisco on some suggested
changes re secondary treatment and discharges to the ocean. Are looking for ways
to cut back on the cost of their program. Needs Survey calls for $300 billion + and
would like to spend $25 billion and close the door on the whole thing.
#6(c) Report of the General Counsel
Mr. Woodruff reported regarding the Alart Company matter discussed at the May 29th
meeting relative to the 30-day agreement. Met with Jeanne Eddows and Mr. Card
following that meeting and a week ago met with them again and made available to
them the minutes and specific action of the Districts. The result of the meetings
was that they indicated that they could not meet the terms and conditions on a
30-day contract. Said management staff agreed that it would be pretty difficult
to evaluate any performance in the course of 30 days. As a result, there has never
been a 30-day contract executed. However, the Manager has recommended that the
Board take into consideration a 90-day contract. Woodruff stated he has prepared
an agreement that outlined the positions of the Dir~ at the May 29th meeting
and removed all of the provisions dealing with the system contemplated in
the original 10 year agreement and itemized dates of which the sludge had to be
removed. Agreement was presented to representatives of Alart Company last week
and at one point there was apparently no chance of agreement on that package. Met
again this afternoon and was now advised--15 minutes ago--that the agreement,
subject to a few changes that he concurred with, is acceptable to Ms. Eddows. If
the Directors decide to grant them a 90-day agreement to enter property and remove
sludge, will be for 90 days and it expressly points out by what days the sludge
must be removed from certain beds. Is designed to give the staff some gauge as
to the progress of the contractors during the course of the 90-day program. A
provision has been requested to be inserted that at the end of the 90-day period
if the contractor has performed in accordance with the terms of the agreement, the
Directors will award a new long-term contract basically in the same scope of the
February agreement. Woodruff said he expressed dissatisfaction with the language
of that. Indicated that somebody has to be a decision maker as to whether they
have performed in accordance with the terms. If this agreement is approved by
the Board, would have to include a provision re determination as to whether or not
contractor has performed . Should be determined by Board of Directors. Advised
that Mr. Clarke met with Ms. Eddows & Mr . Card several times within last 10 day s
and have some understanding re proposed schedule if 90-day agreement acceptable to
Directors. They are willing to accept the agreement subject to relatively minor
changes .
Duke asked if staff agreed that it would be better to go to a 90-day contract
rather than 30 to evaluate properly. Was answered yes, that is correct. Duke
then asked if they could ask Jeanne Eddows whether she would go along with the
general contract they just agreed upon. Was advised that Mr. Card just spoke for
her before the meeting . Duke wanted to ask her to verbally state that she agreed
to it.
Byrne then asked Woodruff to elaborate specifically on the few minor changes to
cont~act. He answered that they would delete referring to dba Alart Company and
refer specifically to Jeanne Eddows. One change that is not minor is clause that
upon satisfactory completion of 90-day contract, Board of Directors will award a
long-term contract consistent with February 20th agreement. Said he considers that
a policy matter and Board should determine that. Would not include or exclude that
without authorization of the Board. Another change was on page 3 re material at
Plant 2 that we have already planned to put in hopper and transport to Plant 1.
That material will be available once it gets to Plant 1. Also add a paragraph that
in the event of misunderstanding or dispute, there will be written notice given
to the other party--10 days notice. In a 30-day contract, not workable. Under
obligations of contractor, changes are to specify that middle bed No. 1. will
be completed within 45 days; second bed north of No. 1 by Sept . 15 and others by
conclusion of agreement. Also, in the event a long-term contract is not awarded
or contract is rescinded prior to 90 days, the contract will have rights to sludge
that he has prepared. Said that might be acceptable to Districts provided that
they be entitled to anything they can ship after 30 days of rescission . Original
agreement erroneously picked up language relative to insurance in the amount of
$3,000,000 and was reduced to $1,000,000. Would use reduced figure. We have to
rearrange the wording with respect to the Districts obtaining some security from
the contractor--paragraph 9. Can take the form of an assignment or might do any
number of things and indicate that they wi~l pay us on a weekly basis.
Mcinnis then commented that the allegation at first was caused by wet weather. Now
with 90-day contract, could weather still be a problem. Who will determine if they
are acceptable . FAH said if they can't do it in the next 90 days, will never be
able to do it. Mcinnis asked if that proved they can do it next time when it rains.
FAH said it wouldn't prove or guarantee that.
Winn stated that any long-term agreement would come back to the Boards. Correct?
Woodruff answered yes.
Burton asked if the original contract was established on a drying operation for
10 years or 15 months or whatever, and what happens when it rains now. FAH said
there wasn't any provision for waiver for any problem in original contract. Asked
what happened before and answered it was trucked away wet. FAH said there are
two areas provided for a drying operation on the ground. One of the things to be
done by contractor is to prepare the gro\Illd by a grading operation. Two areas t o
work in--one area available for two or three years and the other for life of
contract.
-2-
. "
Duke said he wanted to compliment General Cotmsel on comments made and moved the
recommendation of the General Counsel. Motion was seconded. Voice vote.
Motion carried.
Winn stated that he assl.lllled that motion preempted a declaration by Alart Company.
Duke answered yes.
#6(d) Report of Special Committee on Industrial Waste Ordinance
Byrne said that the report on Alternative 5 was certainly an improvement over what
they had the last time but were a couple of points he wanted to make . The charge
against excess capital and capital recovery is 60% of actual cost. Why do we not
plan on charging the flat $204 estimated in 1975? Duke said as far as the Conunittee
is concerned, agree we are giving more consideration to business than we really
should and that was because EPA was going to come out with a similar plan to what
staff wa s proposing . Biggest debate was whether business should be charged retro-
active to 1970 or should be charged starting in 1974. Staff came up with longer
term proposal starting right now and starting with income base or users fee which
involved the amount of water used from now to infinity. Committee said if we took
money now rather than be retroactive, in 10 years that money would double. Some
of the businessmen interested were at the meeting and they also felt that maybe
that wasn't such a bad deal . Probably will be charged more over 20 years but felt
this to be the fair and equitable way. Charge everybody.
Byrne added that this does not solve one of the principal things that were raised--
the immediate lump sum billing comes to a fantastic amount of money. Why not
consider charges amortized over 30 years. FAH stated that actually Mr. Byrne's
letter did help point the staff to look in this direction. That is actually what
we are looking for--iong-term capital recover to industry. Out of this will come
a long-tenn approach that will recover the funding over a long period of time. We
are looking at what is occurring in Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts in
their charges in the last two yea rs. Have been $230 per million gallons. We are
talking about around $200. After we discuss this with industry, may have something
different. It will in the long run solve some problems .
Winn stated that he believed that any action that they would take tonight would
declare an intent to adopt this Committee's proposal and authorize the staff to
again conduct public informal hearings.
Duke added that staff is recommending $200 per million gallons--70% for flow, 20% for
suspended solids and 10% for BOD. This would be authorizing staff to hold informal
hearings with Chambers of Commerce and representatives of industry. Think this is
the way to go. Equitable to everybody. Grandfathers protected under old ordinance
are now going to have to start paying.
Committee's recommendation was then moved and seconded. Voice vote . Motion carried.
FAH will report further at next meeting .
Culver asked how many companies were in that category. John Thomas said he was
reluctant to estimate but maybe 2000 that exceed 2 .5 million per year .
Winn thanked Henry Duke, Committee and staff.
-3-
#9 Consent Calendar items removed:
/l.,.
(f) General Counsel requested this item to be removed. He reported that we took
bids and bidder has requested to take exception to provision in our specifi-
cations which imposes a penalty clause for late delivery. In view of the
complexity of the equipment and our supplier will be havin.g to be served by
numerous sub-suppliers which might shut down his production, it is the
staff's recommendation that we waive that provision in the agreement. Tii.ey
have filed their intent to comply with 300 days but have numerous subcontractors
for various portions of agre ement . Item was moved and seconded.
Duke said he felt we should have some kind of contract with them regarding
completion date. Saltarelli added that if we can't have a penalty claus e,
no sense in giving them a delivery date. Should have some time of clause
that in the evnet of unreasonable delivery, we would have the ability t o do
something.
Mcinnis asked how many bids were received and if other bidders were advised
of this exception. Were two bidders and other bidder took same exception.
FAH then advised that the payment benefit on this is 80 % upon delivery of
equipment . We are not paying the contractor until he delivers equipment s o
this may have some bearing on Directors' decision. REL added 80% to be p a i d
upon delivery and balance upon successful operation of equipment. Said staff
feels that is adequate protection for Districts. Voice vote on mo tion.
Motion carried.
1 "----Instructed Woodruff to put in protection in agre ement.
(q) Asked for location of Sirrine Drive . FAH s a id it is on the b ack s ide o f
Cowan Heights east of Crawford Canyon a rea . REL s ho wed area on ma p. Was
asked if this was within City of Or an ge' s phere of influence , a nd was
a nswered was within City of Tustin. Motion wa s then mad e an d seconde d t o
approve this item. Motion carried.
#11 Ve rb a l r e port of Exec . Committee
Re garding May .. 29th meeting , most of that meeting wa s revie w Alart si t ua t i on.
Met again tonight to review items comin g up on a genda. Mr. Lewis & Mr. Sy lves t e r
will r eport on them l a ter.
#12(a) Report on Joint Works budge t
Fantastic r e port by "World Fa mou s " Director of Finan ce !!
Salta relli had one question regarding research budget. Was wondering if we wo u l d
b e getting a s much out o f what we p a id for SCCWR P as we have been. FAH sai d yes
and Duk e sai d he thought this was r eally g ood . Prove s to government an d prov i des
industry with th e fact tha t th e re are problems to our sys t em . Tii.ink SCCWR P i s
going to continue to be on e o f the mo s t worthwhile proj ect s of the Sanita tion
Di s tricts
#1 2 (b) De f e rred c ompens a ti on pl an
Ge n er a l Coun s el r eported th a t th e Gen e r a l Man age r h as b een cons i de ring this typ e
o f program for som e time to h e lp brea k a p a rt man age me n t pers onn e l from n on-m an ageme n t
p e r sonne l . On e o f th e p ro gr ams th a t wa s s u gges t e d was a de f e rred compe nsat i on p l an.
Wood ruf f said h e was f a irl y familia r with those an d hav e done t h em b efore fo r t h r e e
cities . Sai d they are r e a lly a very worthwh i l e in centive fo r e mp l oyees an d cos t s
-4-
the Districts nothing . Only cost would be slight administrative bookkeeping to
make sure correct entries are made on each individual's accotmt. Report
swmnarizes plan purpose and benefits to Districts and employees. Authorization
on agenda is to prepare resolution --probably at next meeting--adopting plan.
Secondly, preparation of several documents necessary for any individual employee
that participates in the plan to be executed authorizing amotmts to be deferred.
Said he would recommend that we go to Internal Revenue Service and obtain a letter
with their ruling and approval. Said he was sure the program would meet their
approval and we were not required to go to IRS but if they change their minds
later, then program would still be a viable mechanism for employee benefit.
FAH added that he felt that this would be one benefit for supervisory personnel
on the part of management anticipating that there will be some employee bargaining
legislation passed through the State legislature this year, and we don't want to
find outselves in a position where we have to tell employees that we really need
them. Are trying to show our key people that they are part of management.
Winn stated that at meeting of CASA in Palm Springs, two gentlemen spoke indicating
that now is the time to get our management personnel into this.
It was then moved and seconded to direct General Co\Illsel to prepare the necessary
documents. Motion carried.
#13 Nominations for Joint Chairman and Vice Joint chairman
Winn nominated. Motion nominations be closed for Joint Chairman.
Gibbs nominated for Vice Joint Chairman. Moved nominations be closed.
#23 DIST. 11 -Other business
Duke complimented Chairman Winn for doing a helluva good job toni ght.
-5 -