Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1975-05-14
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX Bl 27, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) May 8, 1975 'NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 WEDNESDAY, MAY 14, 1975, 7:30 P.M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA TELEPHD·N ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 , The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. Tentative adjournments prior to next regular meeting: Execut:i.ve Cormni ttee -May 29, 1975, at 5:30 p.m. Adjourned Joint Meeting -May 29, 1975, at 7:30 p,m. MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS Regular Meeting Wednesday, May 14, 1975 7:30 p.m. Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting, but will appear in the supplemental agenda available at the meeting. Format of the Ag enda. The Directors will note that the format of the agenda has been changed slightly, in that the approval of warrants for the Joint Operating Fund and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund, as well as the individual Districts, follow the reports of the Joint Chairman, General Manager, and General Counsel. Since technically all payments are to be approved by roll call vote, the acti o n on the District warrants h as been moved up to be included with the Joint Operating and Joint Construction accounts payable registers. Warrant lists are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting, but will appear in the supplemental agenda available at the meeting. Pursuant to the direction of the Executive Committee, the Districts' General Counsel is continuing discussions with the· County Auditor's office relative to proposed procedures whereby the Districts could pay their bills in a more timely manner, and at the same time, g i ve the Directors a listing of the warrants paid when the meeting agendas are mailed for their perusal. No. 5 -Annual Election of Districts' Chairmen. In accordance with the Districts' standard pr o cedures, a Chairman for each Distri c t Board is elected annually at the May meeting. The Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman are elected in July, following nominations at the June meeting. The Chairmen for the past year are as follows: District No. Director Representing 1 Jerry Patterson City of Santa Ana Supv. Robert Battin County of Orange 2 2 Dale Chaput City of Yorba Linda 3 Donald Fox City of Brea 5 Don Mcinnis City of Newport Beach 6 Kerm Rima Costa Mesa Sanitary 7 Don Saltarelli . City of Tustin 11 Henry Duke City of Huntington For the information of the new Directors, the Districts' regulations provide that each Cha irman automatically becomes a District Beach .. member of the Executive Committee which ordinarily meets monthly at the call of the Joint Cha irman . This committee, which is the only standing committee of the Directors, also includes the Joint Chairman, Vice Joint Chairman, and a representative of the County Board of Supervisors . Its function is to study and make recommenda- tions to the Joint Boards concerning Joint Districts' matters, such as, budgets, salaries, personnel, policies, etc. No. 10 -Consent Calendar . The following items fall into this category in accordance with the definition established by the Boards: All Districts No. 10-a -Appr'oval of Change Order No . 5 for Plant Job No. Pl-16. The Districts recently received a directive from the State and the Environmental Protection Agency on this $30 mill i on project that any federally-funded contract must contain the provisions that the Regional Administrator, the Controller General of the United States, or any authorized representative shall have access to any books, documents, papers and records of the contractor which are pertinent to the project. This change order incorporates those provisions as set forth in the regulations and is at no cost to the Districts or to the contractor. -2- .. No. 1 0-b -Out -of-State Travel and Expenses for Step I Grant Assignments. At the special Board meeting held on March 26th, the staff discussed the work and assignments which are required for the evaluation of the JPL Activated Carbon Treatment System . Several of the staff have gone to Spring fi e ld, Ohio and Belle Mead , New Jersey, for testing and evaluation of the pyroly sis of sewage solids. This action is to ratify the General Manager's authori- zation for out -of-s tate travel and to approve further out -of-state travel and expenses as necessary in conjunction with this Step I grant effort. No . 1 0 -c -Award of Specification No . E-074 , Stainless Steel Slide Gates for Plant No. 2 . Bids were re ceived on May 6th for three stainless steel slide gates which are required to replace the bad l y deteriorated aluminum gates at the "C" Headworks , Plant No. 2. Installation will be made by Districts ' personnel. It is recommended that award be made to the Tatkin Company in the total amount of $6 ,000 plus tax. The engineer's estimate for this purchase is $12,000 . No. 10-d -Stop Not ice s for Plant Job No . P2-20. Two stop notices have been received on this contract for labor and materials suppl ied in the amount of $5 ,202.09 from Atlas Wire and Cab l e Company and $10 ,475 .18 from Almo Electric Company. I t is recommended that the stop notices be received and fi l ed . No. 10-e -Amend Contract with JPL to Designate NASA. At the special Board meeting of March 26th , the Board approved a contract with the Jet Propuls i on Laboratory of the California Institute of Technology to perform necessary services in connection with the evaluation of the Activated Carbon Treat - ment System. Because of the contractual r elationship of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory with the National Aeronautics Sp ace Adminis - tration, it is requested that the contract be between the Districts and NASA . This action will not change the responsibilities of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory of the California Institute of Technology personnel, but only assign the monies due under the contract to the Nat i onal Aeronautics Space Administration. It is re commended that this change in contract be approved. -3- No. 10-f -All-Risk Group Travel Insurance. It has been suggested that the Boards cons i der the purchase of an all-risk group travel insurance policy for the protection of the Districts' Directors and staff membe r s while on District business outside Orange County . The staff has sought premium quotations from the Districts ' liability carrier and the employees' group health insurance company. We have received a quotation of $550 as an annual premium f or $100,000 a ll-risk group travel coverage for 200 District employees and Directors while on business outside Orang,e County. The annual premium will change slightly, depe nding on the actual number of District emp l oyees and Directors of record as of the inception date . No. 10-g -Extension of Southern California Coastal Water Res earch Project Authority t o J une 30, 1 979 . The resolution appearing in the agenda authorizes execution of the second amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement which created the agency known as the Southern Ca lifornia Coastal Water Research Project Author i ty (SCCWRP). Th is research agency is financed · primarily by Ventura County, City of Los Ange le s , Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts , City of San Diego , and our agency . Each agency contributes annual l y on the bas i s of our annual discharge flows . In addition to the $500 ,000 which is contributed annually by the f ive agencies , several research grants have been given by the Envir onmental Protection Agency (EPA). Ou r Districts con- tribut e approximately 15 % of their budget and that f igure i s $79,600 for the 1975-76 year. This organization has gained considerable credibility during the past few years and State and Federal agencies are looking to SCCWRP for substantial scientific data . Without SCCWRP 's existence, it is doubtful that we could get the kind of consideration we have been receiving from EPA and the Congressional committees relat ive to possib l e relaxation of secondary treatment requirements for oce a n discharges. In addition, the work that SCCWRP has done in connection with toxicity and heavy meta l s wi ll, no doubt, l ead to seve ral changes in the allowable numbers for concentrations o f heavy metals that were originally established by the State Board in 1972. SCCWRP has an active r esearch program on disposal of sludge in the ocean . Just recently, the organization was asked b y EPA to s u pply them with their latest scientific inf ormation concerning the effects of sludge disposal p r actices o f the Los Angeles County San it ation Districts and the City o f Los Angeles. It is the staff's re commendation that the Boards authorize execution o f the amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement extending the Project Authority to June 30 , 1979 . If at some time in the futur e the Boards do not wish to continue to support the project, there are provisions whereby the Districts ' financial participation can be terminated. -4- No. 10-i -Award of Purchase of Two Trucks. On December 11, i974, the Boards authorized purchase of two Cab and Chassis Ford t~ucks from Peck Road Ford Truck Sales in the amount of $11,233. Subsequent to the award of purchase, the Sales Company was advised by the Ford Motor Company that addi- tional emission control equipment would be required which has now increased the price of the two trucks by $389.26. The firm has requested that their additional costs be added to the bid price, in that they were not aware of these new requirements at bid time. The staff has reviewed the Sales Company's worksheets and we are convinced that the firm did not receive notificatio n of the addi- tional requirements until after the b id opening. Since the , second bidder's delivery price is $500 more and they, too, would, no doubt, have to add the costs for the additional emission con- trol equipment, it is the staff's recommendation that the original award price be increased by $389.26 for the required emission control equipment. No. 10-k -Santa Ana Redevelopment Project. The action appearing on the agenda receives and files a notice of a joint public hearing on an amendment to the Redevelop- ment Plan and the Environmental Impact Report of the City of Santa Ana. District No. 2 No. 10-1 -Rental Agreement for Temporary Construction Right of Way. It is necessar y to provide sufficient temporary construction right of way for the construction of the Carbon Canyon Interceptor, Job No. 2-17-1, extending from Crowther Avenue through right of way to Palm Drive. This Rental Agreement with the Woodbine Corporation provides the needed construction right of way for a period not to exceed 90 days at a cost of $1.00. The contractor is required, at no additional cost to the District, t o restore the area to its original condition. We recorrt~end approval o f this Rental Agreement. No! 10-m -Solicit Proposals from Appraisers for Jobs Nos. 2-14-4 and 4-14-5. The first three contracts of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, extending from La Palma Avenue and Grove Street to the County line, are in public right of way to the end of La Palma Avenue easterly of Imperial Highway. From that point, the line will traverse through private right of way and property owned by the County in the Featherly Park area. It will be necessary to appraise the value of the right of way required and it is recommended that the General -5- Manager be authorized to solicit proposals from qualified appraisers and present them to the Board for their consideration at the June meeting. The engineers estimate that the District 's obligation for t hi s r ight o f way is on l y approximately six percent of the total cost, the bal ance to be borne by the Upper Basin Agency (Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority). No . 1 0-n -Approve Plans and Specificat i ons for Jobs Nos . 2 -14-3, 2-14 -4, 2-14 -5 . The plars and specifications for the Santa Ana River I nter- c.eptor extending from La Palma Avenue and Grove Street , Anaheim, t o the County line have been prepared in accordance with the design criteria approved by the Boards at their regular meeting o f Ma r ch 12th . The plans and specifications for the three con- tracts were submitted to the State and Environmental Protection Agency on April 21st . The total project cost including construction i ncidentals and rig ht of way is estimated to be $1 2,250 ,000 . The Di strict 's obligation will be approximately $2,500,000 . A summary of the engineer 's costs is shown on the estimate included wi th the agenda. It is recommended that the Board concur with EPA 's negative dec l aration that an Environmental I mpa ct Statement is not necessary and approve the plans and specifications submitted to the State Water Res our ce s Control Board, and further instruct the General Manager to es tabl ish the bid date after receipt of the nece ssary approvals from the Stat e and the Environme ntal ·Protection Agency. No . 10-o -Change Order No . 1 to Contract No. 2-12R , Adjust i ng F i nal Engineer 's Quantities . This recomm e nded Change Order No. 1 is an adjustment of the engineer 's contract quantities in the total amount of a $12,850 deduction. Al s o included in t he change order i s a time extension o f seven calendar days for rescheduling requirements set by the Department of Transportat i on . No . 10-p -Accepting Contract No. 2-12R, Yorba Linda Force Main Investigation, as Complete . This project , the Yorba Linda Force Main Investigation, has now been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications . The staff is recommendin g adoption of the standard resolution authorizing the filing of a Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agre ement . No . 10-q -County Flood Control District Inspection Services . The motion appearing on the agenda author i zes payment for inspection servi ces in connection with construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Plant No. 1 to La Palma Avenue, Anaheim, i n the F l ood Control District's rig ht of way . It is recommended that the paym e nt be approved. -6- No. 10-r -Annexation No. 10 -Anaheim Hills, Inc. The standard resolution appearing in the agenda material orders annexation of approximately 63 acres to the District in the Anaheim Hills development area. The planned densities are consistent with the anticipated flow contributions in the Dis - trict's Master Plan . On October 21, 1974, the Board approved this annexation for consideration by the Local Agency Formation Conunission (LAFC). We have now received LAFC approval and the ·proponents have paid the necessary annexation fees . Approval of Annexation No . 10 is reconunended. District No. 3 No. 10-t -Approve Plans and Specifications for Job No . 3-21-1, Westside Relief Interceptor. The next construction project scheduled in this District is the Westside Relief Interceptor extending from the San Diego Freeway and Seal Bea~h Boulevard northerly in Seal Beach Boulevard and Los Alamitos Boulevard to Katella Avenue, then easterly along Katella Avenue to the southerly extension of Denni Street . Dis - cussions have been held with the staffs of the Cities of Seal Beach, Los Alamitos and Cypress regarding the alignment and the construction conditions associated with this project. These special conditions were discussed in detail in the Preliminary Engineering Report and the Environmental Impact Report prepared for this project . The interceptor is approximately 16,500 feet in length and ranges in size from 30" to 39". The engineer's estimate for this project is $1,530,000. It is recommended that bids be received on this project on June 3rd in order that con- siderable work can be accomplished during the summer to minimize conflicts with school crossings. No . 10-u -Change Order No. 10 to Contract No . 3-18. Change Order No. 10 incorporates the Federal requirements as described in the change order for Job No . Pl -16, allowing the Environmental Protection Agency personnel access to the contractor's books, records and documents. There is no additional cost to the District or the contractor. No . 10-v -Approve Agreement with Gulf Oil Company . In 1924 , the County of Orange granted an easement (now in the City of Westminster), to Gulf Oil Company for the installation of a 10-inch oil line in Knott Avenue. The only relocation obli - gation associated with the easement was for changing the grade of the street . No mention was made as to relocation by the Oil Company for underground utilities. There does appear to be a dispute between the proprietary rights of the Oil Company and -7- the governmental function as associated wi th the Sani tation District 's construction of trunk sewer fac ilities. In earlier discussi ons with Mr . C. Arthur Nisson, it was mutually agreed that in the best inter.e.st of all parties affected,· a cost sharing arrangement might be the best way of handling thi3 matter . The relocation of 670 l ineal feet of 12-inch oil line will cost $20,000, and it is recommended that the Board authorize an agr eement in form approved by the new General Counse l, wi th the Gulf Oil Company to sha~e the relocation cost in an amount not to exceed $10,000 . District No. 5 No . 10-x -Newport-Irvine Waste Management Planning Agency (NIWA), Funding Contributions for 1974-75 Fiscal Year. The action appearing on the agenda author izes payment of $2,000 f or the Districts ' share of funding for the "208" Planning Agency for the Upper Newport Bay tributary area through June 30 , 1 97 5. No . 1 0 -y -Authority to Award Contract No . 5 -14R-6. Plans and specifications have now been completed for Wet Well Repair and Remodeling at 14th Street and "A" Street Pumping Stations , Contract No . 5 -1 4R -6 (District No . 5 Operating Fund 1974-7 5 Wet Well Repair Budget $25 ,000). It is recommended that bids for this p r oject be received on May 20th, and the General Manager be given authority to award the contract to the lowest bidder. Districts 5 and 6 No. 1 0 -z -Award of Contract No. PW-041, Resolution No . 75 -74 . This contract is for the installation of a connection to the Pacific Coast Highway trunk to provide additional flex i bility in the outfall system serving Di stric t No. 5 . The Distr ic t has pro - cured the necessary material for this contract and the contractor is required to install this material and make the connection . Tabulation of the bids received is enclosed with your agenda material and it i.s recommended that award be made to F. T . Ziebarth Company in the low bid amount of $7 ,400. Th i s work is scheduled to be com - pleted prior to June 15th. District No. 7 No . 10-aa -Addendum No . 1 to Contract No . 7-6 -7 . This addendum was issued to include the provision f or bolt - down manhole covers f or those manholes located within easements. The District is experiencing the problems associated with dispo - sition of materials in the sewers such as timbe r s , rocks , scrap -8- metal, etc., where manholes are accessib le in rights of way other than publ i c str~ets. No. 10-bb -Award of Contract No. 7-6-7. Bids for this project, the Tustin -Orange Relief Sewer extending from Irvine Boulevard to Fa i rhaven, along the Southern Pacific Rai lroad right of way, were received on Tuesday , May 6th. A tabulation of the 17 bids received is included with the agenda material. Bidding was excellent and competitive on this project and it is recommended that the award be made to Rogers & Davies in the amount of $349,818. The engineer's estimate for this project is $480 ,272. No. 10-c c -Acceptance of Easement from Department of Transp ortation. Recently the Department of Transportation has declared certain excess properties ad j acent to the San Diego Freeway and abutting the District's easement for the Gisler Trunk , Contract .. No. 7 -1, and has offered it to the District at no cost . The acceptance of this property will provide better access for our maintenance personnel for the cleaning o f th i s sewer . No. 10-dd -Rental Agreement with Sout h ern Pacific Railroad Company for Contract No . 7 -6 -6 . The contract documents for this project set forth construction easements in the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way extending from Laguna Road to Irvine Boulevard. In our review of the plans and specifications for this project with the City, we were advised that the City of Tustin would acquire this pr operty in sufficient time to a llow the District 's contractor the use of the property without any agreement with the Railroad Compan y. The City has not concluded their acquisition in time to accommodate the con- tractor presently constructing this facility . Representatives of the railroad initially asked for the sum of $700 per month per acre, based on their estimate o f the value o f the land. The staff has negotiated a temporary lease of approxi - mately 3~ acres for construction purposes for the sum of $500 per month per acre. It is, therefore, rec ommended that the Distr ict enter into a temporary l ease with the Southern Pacific Land Company for the use of this construction easement (approximately 3 .5 acres) lor a sum of $500 per month per acre. It is estimated that this total rental cost will not exceed $8,800. No. 10-ee -Annexation No. 45 -Rowe Annexation . The res olution appearing in the agenda is .the final action r equired by the Board to complete the annexation of approximately one acre to the District in the vicinity of Sirrine Drive . This -9- .. single-family residence annexation was approved for action by the Local Agency Formation Commission on February 19, 1975. The proponents have paid the annexation fees and the staff recommends approval of· Resolution No . 75-78 -7 . No. 10-ff -Request for Annexation of One Acre. We have received a reqµest for the annexation of approxi - mate l y one acre to the District in the vicinity of Rangeview Drive and Brier Lane. It is recommended that the matter be referred to the staff for study and recommendation to the Board. District No . 11 No. 10-hh -Amending Agreement for Sewage Disposal within the Bolsa Chica State Park. The State Department of Parks and Recreation has requested that the agreement date be changed from March 27, 1975 to March 15, 1974, to agree with the State's budget funding . Apparently, ~ the funds due the District pursuant to the agreement were provided for in the State's 1973 -74 fiscal year budget. It is the staff 's recommendation that the change in the agreement date be approved. All Districts No. 12 -Financial Report. Included with the agenda material is the Districts' Financial Report for the nine -month period ended March 31st . The Director of Finance is recommending several budget transfers for reasons stated in the report. If any Director has questions concerning the Financial Report and the recommended budget transfers, please call either Wayne Sylvester, the D'istr:icts' Director of Finance, or Fred Harper, telephone 540-2910. No. 13 -Actions Regarding Recission of Contract for Sale of Digested Sludge, Specification No . S-012. On February 19, 1975, the District No. 1 Board of Directors, on the s .taff ' s recommendation, awarded a long-term contract to Jeanne Eddows, dba Alart Company, for the disposal of digested sewage solids at both treatment facilities . In the staff's opinion, the contractor has failed to process the material for removal as provided in the agreement, and as a result, a public nuisance by reason of odors and a health hazard has occurred. The Districts have been producing approximately 100 yards per day of centrifuge cake which has been accumulating in large quantities throughout the Plant No. 2 grounds. -10- j The Districts' personnel are currently processing the accumulated s l udge material; therefore , we request authority to negotiate sale of the processed sewage solids for the highest price on an interim basis, pending award of a new l ong -term sludge disposal contract . In addition, we are requesting authority t o secure new bids for a long-term contract . The staff wi ll be prepared to go into more detail concerning this matter at the meeting, if requested. No. 14 ·-Tri-Agency Technic.al Adv isory Committee (TRI-TAC). On April 29, Joint Chairman Winn wrote to W. W. Adams, Chairman of the State Water Resources Control Board , suggesting the formati on of a committee of local l y -elected officials repre - sending the TRI -TAC organizations and the County Supervisors Associati on of Ca lifornia, for the purpose of reviewing proposed regulations invo l ving policy matt e rs affecting l ocal entities. A Board member has requested that this matter be put on the agenda for further discussion relative to the size of the prop osed com - .. mittee. No. 15 -Hearing on the Proposed Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities . Enclosed with the agenda materia l are c ustomi zed ordinances for each Di strict Director, depending on the District(s) repre - sented . The actions appearing on the agenda are pursuant to our public hearing procedures . Item No . 15-g declares each Board 's intent to adopt the respective ordinances as amended relative to It em No. 15-e at an adjourned meeting to be held May 29th at 7:30 p.m. If any Director has any questions concerning the pro - visions of the ordinances, please feel free to call John Thomas , the Districts ' Chief of the I ndustrial and Permit Division , telephone 540-2910 . District 3 No. 27 -Change Order No. 1 to Contract No . 3 -18, Knott Intercept or , Reach 4. Included with the agenda material is a detailed staff report prepared by the Chief Engineer, relative to Change Order No . 11 to this contract, authorizing $96 ,066.79 for additional work which was required over and above the contract specifications . In addition to the added costs, the staff is recommending a time extension of 180 calendar days . -11- District 7 No. 30 -Acquisition of Right of Way for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-6-7. The staff will make a verbal report on the status of the acquisition of a pipeline easement on the Southern Pacific right of way extending from Irvine Boulevard to Fairhaven . Fred A. Harper General Manager -12- \.' ' . -··~ I' . J'~BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Bo)( 8127 10844 Ellis. Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif ., 92708 Telephones: of Orange County, California (1) (2) JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE MAY 14, 1975 -7:30 P.·M. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation Roll Call Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA ADJOURNMENTS POSTED./ COMP .& MILE/\GE ..... ~ .. . FI LES SET UP ....... Y, ........ . RESOLUTIC ~!S CERTIFI ED .. . Lmrns \'.'RITTEN ............. . MINUTES l'.'R lTTEN .... ~ MINUTES HLED ....... !L.. DISTRICT 3 (3) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from the City of Buena Park regarding election of mayor and appointment of alternate to serve on t he . ITEMS OM SUPPLE/\~ENTAL AGENDA ft\\S District's Board as follows: (*Mayor) Active J .esse M. Davis Alternate Don R. Griffin* (4) EACH DISTRICT (5) (6) (7) FILE ................. . LETTER ············- A/C .... TKlR •••• Conside ration of motions approving minutes of t he followin g me e tings, as mail ed : t-1\\ s District 1 April 9, 1975 regular and April 29, 19 75 special . M\~· District 2 April 9, 1975 re g u lar a nd April ~9, 1975 special M\S District 3 April 9, 1975 r egular and April 29, 1975 special f\\\s Dist_rict 5 April 9, 1975 r egu l ar and April 29, 1975 special . M\S District 6 April 9' 1975 regular and April 29; 1975 .special M\5 District 7 April 9' 197 5 regular a nd April 29, 197 5 speci a l ~\S District 11 April 9' 1975 regular an d April 29 , 1975 special EACH DISTRICT Annual election o f Chairmen o f (a) DISTRICT 1 -~ (b) DISTRICT 2 -~ ( c) DISTRICT 3 -~ (d) DISTRICT 5 -~~ (e ) DISTRICT 6 -~ ( f) DI STRICT 7 -.D~ the Boards (g ) DISTRICT 11 ~ ~ (", 1r. ~~· ~~l\ App ointme nt o f Chairme n pro t e rn, if n ecessary T~ ALL DISTRICT S Reports of~ craD Jo int Ch airman C(hl) General Ma n age r @) General Co unsel i i ~ i I I I I ' ! I I .I t .. ( 8 ) tt\\> ALL DISTRICTS Conside ration of motion to receive and file certification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment ( 9 ) · ALL DISTRICTS ff\\$ (9) ~CALL VOTE •• - ·---frrMS ON SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA Conside ration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund accounts payable check r egisters for signature ~f the Chairman of District No . 1, and authorizing payment of claims listed on page "I" · (a) DIS".PRIG".P 1 warrants, if al'i:y ~\$ (b) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving warrants. See page "II" DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving warrants. See page "I I" -( d) DIS".PRIO".PS J & 11 BtlOpenae fti:l'ld Harral'i:BD, if a:Ry ~\ S (e) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving war~ants. See page "I I" ft\\S (f) DISTRIC TS 5 & 6 . Consideration of motion approv~ng sus pense fund warrants. See page "II" (g) DIS".PRIG".P 6 warral'i:to, if al'i:y ~\s Ch> DISTRICT 7 Consideration o f motion app.roving wa rrants . See page "I II" (i) DIO'!'RIC'f' 11 vvar~tu1ta, if an3· (10) ALL DISTRICTS Roll Call Voto or Cn st Unanimous Ballot CONSEN T CALENDAR All matters placed up o n the consent calendar are considered as not requirin g discussion or furt h er e xplanat i on and unl ess a ny particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance , there will be no separate discussion of these items . All items on th e consent calendar will b e enacted by one action approving all motions , and .cast ing a unanimous b a llot for resolutions include d on the con sent calenda r. All items removed f r om the consent calendar shall b e conside~ed in the regular order of business . Member s of the public who wish to remove ·an item from the con sent calendar sha ll, up on recogniti on by the chair, state their n ame , address and designate by letter th e item to be remov ed from the cons e nt calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determin f any items are to be d e l eted from the cons e nt calenda ~ ~ J _j ) c!.~ "'h Consid eration of a ction app rove all agenda it em s appe a ring on the co n se nt c a l e n dar spec ific a lly removed from same . -2 - .. ·, (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS FI LE ·······-······-· LETI ER •.•..•• -.'.·- A/ C .. :.TKLR •••• motion approving Change Order No. 5 specifications for 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatmen · lamation Plant No . 1, Job No. Pl-16, incorporating n e and Federal require- ments regarding audit of contrac to r s into the contract with Donovan Construction Company , to the Districts. See page "A" FILE ............ ".- lETIER ···········- A/C .... TKLR •••• (b) Consideration of motion. ratifying action o f the General Manager and authorizing travel and .incidental expenses for out-of-state field testing on JPL Activated Carbon Treatment System, as required by provis i ons of the State and Federal construction grant requi rements Q .... ~·-·-(c) lETIER ···---·-. A/C .... TKLR . -- ... ~ .... Q.! .. -.. - ························-@ FILE ........... ""'" LETIER ........... - AlC .... TKLR ··- (e) .FILE -···········-- . LETIER .......... - A/C .... TKlR ·- .. ~~-~ .. cf.::'_. FILE ················-( f) LETIER ····-·-- A/C .... TKLR - ·¥·-~·=··-~ ..................... u- ·consideration of motion to recei ve and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase of Three (3) Stainless Steel Slide Gates, Spec ific ation No. E-074, to Tatkin Company, in the amount of $6,ooo.oo plus tax. See page "B" Consideration of motion to receive and f ile the followirtg Stop Notices against Mel · Gorham Electric Company , contractor for Power Reliability Project at P·lant No . 2, Job No. P2 -2 0: (1) .Alma Electric, Inc. -$10,47 5 .1 8 (2) Atlas Wire & Cable Corp: -$5,202 .09 Consideration of Resolution No .. 75-63, amending Resolut i on No. 75-48 and providing that the agreement for services to be performed by the California Ipstitute of Technology , Jet Propulsion Laboratory, in connection with. the JPL Activated Carbon Treatment Syste~ be changed fo r execution by District No. 1 and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)-Pasadena Office. See page ".C" Consideration of motion authorizing placement of $1 00 ,00 0 all-risk group travel policy for the protection of District Directors and staff memb ers whil e on business of the Districts outside Orange County (estimated annual cost for coverage of 200 employees and Di rectors is $550) . ~Consideration of Resolution No. 75-64, approving and FILE ···········-··-authorizing e xecution of Second Amendment To Joint Powers \!;TIE!"":)____ Agre ement Creating An Agency To Be Known As The Southern A/C .... TKLR •••• California Coastal Water Research Project Authority, ................... ---extendin g said Project Authority to June 30, 1 979, in ....................... -form approved by . the General Counsel. See page "D" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- .. (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS ·(Continued) (h) c;: ..... ~·-··· LETIER ·········-- ·A/C .... TKLR - ~ .+ ~--=J/.;~ --~ Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Smith-Emery Company re g arding transfer of pwnership to said company from Testin g En g ineers, Inc. and authorizing payment for in-process pipe testing for the ·balance of the 1974-75 fiscal year to Smith-Emery Company under the same terms a nd c o nditi ons of the Testing Engineers, Inc. proposal adopted by th e Boards of Directors on July 10, 1974. See p age "E" FILE ·····-- l ETIER ···- A/C .... TKL R ,..... (i) Considerat ion of mo tio n a utho rizing in c r ease o f $389 .26 in the aw a rd of Sp ecificatio n No. A-0 75, Tw o (2) 16,000 lb. GVW Cab & Ch ass i s to Pec k Road Fo r d Truck Sales, for mandated emission control e quipmen t requi r ed subsequent to bid submitt a l (j) Conside ration of motion to rece i v e a nd fil e s t a ff p r ogre ss report on Treatme n t Plant Co nstruct ion Pr oje ct s . See page "F" DIST RI CT 1 FILE ·······-·······-( k ) LETIE R ·······-···- A/C __ .TKlR -· -·-------__ .. _.. ..... ·-····-·- Consideratio n of moti o n to rece i ve an d f ile No tic e o f Joint Publi c Hearing o n Ame n dme n t t o the Redevelopment Pl a n and t h e Environmental Impact Report of the City of Santa An a Redevelopment Projec t Ar ea DIS TRI CT 2 . ·v-~---··-······-(1) c. LETTE R) •• _.~ A/C .... TKLR .•.. )' FILE '-···--···--(m) lETIER ----·- A/C •... TKlR ·- • .,.,...,u o•••-•••••·•••••- ............................. Co n s id e r a tio n o f Re soluti o n No . 75 -65 -2 , approving t emporary · r e nt a 1 ·agr eeme n t with Wood bine Co r p . for r i g ht of way i n c o nne c t i on wit h const r uc t ion o f Carbon Canyon -Pal m Drive Int e r c e ptor Sewer , Rea ch 1, Cont r act No . 2 -17-1 ; and auth or izing payme nt in t h e a mo un t of $1.00 fo ~ use o f sai d rig ht of way .. See p age "G" · Con si d eration of mot i on author iz i ng the Ge n e r a l Manager t o so licit a p praisal proposal s f or service s ~n connection .with a cqui s i tio n o f r ight of wa y for construct i on of the Sant a An a Ri ver Int e r cep t or, Co nt rac t s Nos . 2 -14-4 a n d 2-14-5 . See page "H" (C ONSE NT CALE NDAR con t i n u ed on pa ge 5) -4- (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 2 (n) Consideration of the following actions re Santa Ana River Interceptor projects from La Palma to the Orange ~·I ·I' '2, FILE i."··~·.-:-··t··· LETIElt ............ .. County boundary: See page "I-1" (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Environmental Impact Assessment declaring that said projects will not have a significant affect on the environment, pursuant to the determination of the Environmental Protection Agency, and recommending a negative declaration therefor. See. pages "I-2" through "I-6" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-80-2, Making FILE·················· a Negative Declaration and providing for notice tmER ············-thereof on said projects. See page "I-7" & "I-8" A/C •••• TKLR •••• ~-~-±::::" ( 3) Consideration of the following resolutions approving plans and specifications for the Santa Ana River Interceptor; authorizing the General Manager to establish the bid date upon receipt of grant approval from the State Water Resources Control Board Resolution No. 75-66-2 FILE •••.••••.••••..••• LETTER ··~··--:······ A/C ~/J)iQL.r-. Santa Ana River Interceptor and South Santa Ana River Interceptor Connector, Reaches 2, 3 & 4, Contrac_t No. 2-14-3. See page "J~' (o) FILE ················- LETIER ···········- A/C .... TKLR -- Fil~ ·······-······-~ r.:=:~.-J '. ">/ (p) ~~[01\....J A/C .... TKLR •••• I . i&:d.. .. ~ ...... . -·-····-----··········-· FILE ·-··-·-- lETIER ···-·····- ~ A/C .•.. TKLR •••• -········-·········-···· (q) 75-67-2 75-68-2 Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Reach 5, Contract No. 2-14-4. See page "K" Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Reaches 6, 7 & 8, Contract No. 2-14-5. See page · "L" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Yorba Linda Force Main Investigation, Contract No. 2-12R, authorizing an adjust- ment of engineer's quantities and a total deduction of $12,850.00 from the contract with Mark Dakovich, Inc.; and granting an extension of time of 7 calendar days due to requirements of the State Department of Transportation .See page "M" Consideration of Resolution No. 75-69-2, accepting Yorba Linda Force Main Investigation, Contract No. 2-12R, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. ·see page "N" Consideration of motion authorizing payment to Orange County Flood Control District for inspection services in connection with construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Plant No. 1 to La Palma Avenue as follows: (a) Contract No. 2-14-1, for the period June, 1974 through July, 1974, in the amount of $174.21 (b) Contract No. 2-14-2, for the period June, 1974 through January, 1975, in the amount of $2 ,_176. 20 (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6) -5- (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5) DISTRICT 2 (r) FILE ·······-···d(S~/ ~P'"-~ A/C •... TK LR .••• (s) Consideration of Standard Resolution No.· 75-70-2, ordering annexation of approximately 63.03 .acres to the District within the Anaheim Hills, Inc. development area (Annexation No. 10 -Anaheim Hills Annexation · No. 2 to County Sanitation District No. 2) Consideration of motion · to receive and file staff progress reports on construction of the Yorba Linda Pump Station, Contract No. 2-15; the Carbon Canyon- Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer, Reach ·l, Cont~act No. 2-17-1; the Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer, Reach 2 , fr om Carbon Canyon Channe l to Kraemer Boulevard, Contract No. 2-17-2; and the Carbon Canyon Interceptor s ·ewer, Contract No. 2-18. See pages 11 0 11 , "p 11 , 11Q11 and 11R11 DISTR ICT 3 FllE ·--·---· .( t) lETIE R ···-·-- A/C __ .TKl R -·- -~---~/ ·d_f7. ... -. fiLE ··-···-·-- LlmER ····---- A/C ...• TKL R - ...................... .___,. -.__ ... -..... ~--~---- LETIER ·------ A/C .... TK LR ·- d.~~ ( u) ( v) ( w) Consideration of Reso lution No. 75-71-3, approving plans and specifications for Westside Relief In terceptor·, Reaches 25, 26 & Portion .of 27, Contract No. 3-21-1, approving said project and authorizing advertising for bids on June 3, 1975. See page "S 11 · Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 10 to the plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3 -1 8, incorporating new State and Federal requirements regarding· audit of contractor's books into the contract with A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Co., a Joint Venture, at no cost to the District. See page "T 11 Consideration of Resolution No. 75-7 2 -3, authorizing agreement with Gulf Oi l Company for relocation of 12-inch oil line in connection with constructio n of Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 & 6, Contract NO. 3 -20 -1; the cost to be shared equally i n an amount not to exceed $10,000 for Distri ct's share, as recommended by the General Counse 1. See page "U" Consideration of motion t o receive and file staff progress · reports on construction of the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-1 8; the Imperial Relief Inte rceptor , Reaches 22 & 23, Contract No. 3-19; the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 & 6 , Contract No. 3-20-1; and the Knott Inter- ceptor, a Portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-2. See pages 11 V11 , 11 W11 , "X 11 and 11 Y11 .(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 7) -6- (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 6) DISTRICT 5 FILE ............•••••• LETIER ...........••• A/C ..... TKLR •••• -~.!.: .. ~:.'. ...... - FILE ................ - lETIER ........... - ( x) (y) Consideration of motion authorizing payment in the amount of $2,000.00 for District's share of , participation in the Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency (NIWA) for the balance of the 1974-75 fiscal year pursuant to agreement for "Section 208" planning of the Upper Newport Bay tributary area A/C .... TKLR ·-· ~--~~ Consideration of Resolution No. 75-73-5, approving plans and specifications for Wet Well Repair and Remodeling at llJth Street and "A" Street Pumping Stations, Contract No. 5-14R~6; authorizing advertising for bids on May 20, 1975; and authorizing the General Manager to award contract for said work to the lowest responsible bidder -~·.,-See page "Z" DISTRICTS 5 & 6 FILE··-·-·-·-·---( z) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-711, to receive and file ~~~v bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract we .... TKLR -for Eccentric Plug Valve Installation, Pressure Trunk "B", J. .. ~ .. !~~~ .. "-.0 ~ 'Y Districts 5 & 6, Specification No. PW-041, to F. T. Ziebarth JE .. .::.:~~~~:h_eil(.; L... Co. in the amount of $7, 400. 00. See pages "AA" and "BB" DISTRICT 7 FILE ................ .. LETTER ...........••• A/C .... TKLR·- FILE ................ ... (aa) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the (bb) · plans and specifications for the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 11 and a Portion of Reach 12, Contract No. 7~6-7, providing for bolt-down manhole covers ~/ >~-'"" '7"···'·······-- Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 75-75-7, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 11 and a Portion of Reach 12, Contract No. 7-6-7 ,' to · A/C .•.. TKLR --· ~----~-- ~--~ A/C ••.. TKLR ·-· .I~!~ .. tL~ ..................... -......... - Rogers & Davies, in the amount of $349,818.00. See page "CC" (cc) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager ·to execute letter of Department of Transportation re Director's Deed (Quitclaim) regarding acquisition of excess properties adjacent to the San Diego Freeway and abutting the District's easement for the Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-1; and consideration of Resolution No. 75-76-7, authorizing acceptance of Director's Deed from the State of California, Department of Transportation, at no cost to the District. See page "DD". ·(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 8) -7- .. (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 7) (dd) onsideration of .Resolution No. 75-77-7, approving temporary ~ v rental agreement with Southern Pacific Railroad Company ~--··-·-for right .of way in conn~ction with construction of the t meR ....... ----Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 10, Contract No. 7-6-~;' . A/ ... TKLR -~and authorizing payment in the amount of . $500 per month · ~~ per acre, for a total amount not to exceed $8 ,-800. 00, · __ .. ___...; for use of said right of way. See page "EE" Fite ...... ~ . .,, _ v"S,7e) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 75-78-7, · ordering ~-:~~ annexation of approximately . 901 acres to the District in A/C •..• TKLR - ···-······--····-··-- the ~icinity of Sirrine Drive (Annexation No . 45 -Rowe Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7}_ ---·····-(ff) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from ~.-.. ~-:=--Robert and Sharlene Rauch requesting annexation of approxi- ~n rrr11-r-.[i/ mately 1 acre of territory to the District in the vicinity tmeR · ·:-······-of Range view Drive and Brier Lane, and refer to staff for A/C .... TKLR .••• · study and · recommendation. See page "FF" · --···········:·-···-(gg) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress re~ort on construction of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 10, Contract No. 7-6-6. See page "GG" DISTRICT 11 /.'~;···-··-·-@consideration of Resolution No. ·75-79-11, amending Resolution ~~·· No. 74-97-11 re agreement with State Department of Parks and Alf -···TKLR -·· H0 Recreation providing for disposal of sewage ori g inating ((l.;~_1f-91-J l within the Bolsa-Chica· State Beach, and authorizing change ~ of agreement date as requested by the State Department of Parks and Recreation. See page "HH" (11) ALL DISTRICTS (12) Fl lE ················- ~7cE~ .. -~~~; ··-~ \ s Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if ariy ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file financial report of Director of Finance for nine-month period ending March 31, 1975; and authorizing budget transfers as recommended by the Director of Finance (mailed with agenda material). --··:······--·~ ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of actions regarding contract with Jean Eddows, dba Alart Company, for Sale of Digested Sewage Solids, FILE ···············- LETIE R ·····-- A/C .•.. TKLR -- E ············-·• LETIE R ·····-- A/C .... TKLR .. ...... +).: .. ·-····- Specification No. S-012: c:GJ> Staff report . @consideration of motion ratifying action of the staff rescinding said contract, as recommended by the General Counsel. See page "II" (c) M\'S . ( d) M)S Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate sale of processed sewage solids for the highest price oti an interim basis pending award of new long-term sludge disposal contract Consideration of motion authorizing staff to advertise for bids for a long-term contract for sale of digested sewa g e sludge . -8- ·~ (14) ALL DISTRICTS @"·~~..... Further discussion re Tri-Agency Technical Advisory temR ...... :....... Conuni t tee (TRI TAC) A/~~:::~~-~ EACH DISTRIC~. -·---·--Proposed O:r-cHnance Establishing Regulations For Use of · District Sewerage Facilities (Draft mailed with agenda) (a) Open hearing q ~ 0 7 (b) Report of Secretary Introduction of Ordinance No. , an Ordinance i't\.E ............ ·...... Establishing Re g ulations For ·useof District Sewerage tETIER .......•.••.•• Facilities, by title only, as follows: A/C •.•. TKLR ••.• ..... --···--d•············-· District No . ~ l /fl/5 rNlb 2 ,vi l s M) $ 3 5 Ml> M/s M/S Mj s · IVl 1 ~ M.)..5 11 M/ S Ordinance No. 103 204 305 508 603 71 6 1103 and conside r ation o f motio n b y t he r espect i ve Di s trict waiving r ead i ng of its e n ti r e ordinance (must be adopted by unanimo u s vote of Di r ec t o r s present). ~") Comme nts by g enera l public, if a ny C (l) Rece ive a nd fil e wri tten comments , if any (2) Oral comme n t s, if a n y ~ . (e) Co n s i de r ation o f i nco r po rating fina l s u gge st i o n s and other c h anges i n wo r ding of st a f f , ge n eral p ublic and Directors , as th e Boards may d i rect FI LE ···········-··-( f) · LETIE R ........... - Close h earin g lo: ll 3 · 1-\~ ··:~L.R.,;-~ ~-e ·· . ..lJR.. ...... i - De c lar i n g intent to adop t the r espect i ve ordinances at a n adj o u rne d meet i ng to be he ld May 29, 197 5 , at 7 :30 p .m. in the Di s tri cts ' a dmini st r at i ve offi ce (1 6 ) ALL DISTRICTS Othe r bus i ness and commu n ica t i on s o r supp l emental age n da i tems (1 6 ) ~Sta ff repor t r e teleph one d i scuss i o n Mo n day , May 1 2 , FILE ·············-·-~ wi th Ray Re my , Exe cu t i ve Dire c t or of the Southern t mER ........... -Ca l iforni a Association of Gov e rnme nts (SCAG ) relat iv e A/C .... TKLR ·-· sumJZ:~r~~~GENDA to the Districts ' pos i tion conc e rnin g designation of ... f.~~··········-· SCAG as t h e planning eleme nt for the planning a r ea (b) ITEMS OM SUPl't[MENTAL A GEN DA FILE ·······-··-···- t ETT Elt ···-- A /C .•.. TKL!t ·- --···········-····--·-....... •••·------·~u• descri.bed below . See page "IV" F u rth er co n s ide r ation of Di st r icts ' pos i tion opposin g i de n t ifi cat i on o f a propose.ct "Sect i n 208 " areawid e plann ing area described as : c/Y'-"<> ~'"'-) All of Orange Cou n ty and those portions of Vent u ra , Los An ge l e s , Riverside and Sa n Bernar di n o Counties l ying without the Sa nta Cl ara , Los An ge les and San t a Ana River Basins pla nnin g a re a s a n d t h a t portion of Ri ve r side Co un ty lyi n g n ort hw es t of th e San ta Margu e rita Ri v e r sub-b a sin a nd south o f th e San ta Ana Ri v e r Ba s i n p lanni n g area . -9- (17) .DISTR ICT 1 Other business and communications or supplement a l agenda items ~···---=N\\S (11> ca> C. .•.. rKLR -·· ITEMS ON ____ ..$UPPLEMEN TAL AGENO A Considerati on -of ~otion to receive and file le tter from B. J. Fibres, Inc., dated May 7, 1975, requesting waiver of delinqu e ncy and penalty fees r e Connection and Use Ordinance No. 1 02 . S ee pa ge "V" -·0r,-c·~;; Vot e or Cast una nimo us Bal lot (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-82-1 °(in f o rm approved by Gen e ral Co u nsel) authorizing waiver of delinquenc y and pena lty fees assessed against B . J. F ibres , as recommended by the staff. Se e page "VI'' H't\11'1';1!;,. t-·-+18) DIST RICT 1 Consider at i on of mo tion t o adjourn t o 7:30 p.m ., May 29 , 1 975 l/\10 ( 19) 0 agenda (20) DISTRICT 2 (21) (26 ) FILE -··--·- LETI ER --·--c 27) J.R ··- ---~\S Co nsi derat i on of motion to adjourn to 7:3 0 p .m., May 29 , 1975\\~IO SU genda Consid ~rati on of Re s olut i on No . 75-8i -5 , app r oving inclusion of the City of Newport Beach as an additional member agency of the Ne wport -Irvine Waste -Management Planni ng Agency (NIWA), with no conditions attached to such inclusion pursuant to S ect i on 36 of the Joint Powers Agreeme nt the r efor . See p age 11 VII 11 DISTRICT 11 1 1 \a. Conside r ation of motion to adj o u rn to 7 : 30 p .m., May 29 , 1 975 I · DI STRICT 3 Consideration of motion approvin g Change Orde~ No . 11 to th e plan$ and spec ifi cations for Knott Int erceptor , Reach 4, Contract No . 3-1 8 , authorizin g an addition of $9 6 ,06£.79 for street improvements required by Superior Co urt Case No . 201647 and oth er improvements , and providing f or a time extension of 1 80 calendar days as enwnerated on t h e Chi ef Enginee r's memorandum of May 8 , 1975. See pa ges 11 J._T 11 and 11 KK " -1 0 - (28) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items (28) (a) Consj.deration of motion to re:ei:;i ve and file Summons and Complaint for Damages re Case No. 218569 ,· Kenneth C. Youn g vs. County Sanit a tion District N6. 3, et al., relative ITTMSON SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA 'fl LE -·-·······-···-~-~ .. M).S to the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18, . and refer to the District's General Counsel and liability insurance carrier for appropriate action A/C .... TKLR •••• (b) '· ········--······-·····-· ITTMS ON Consideration of motion to receive, file and reJect claim submitted by Southern California Edison Company, dated May 8, 1975, in the amount of $i,517;11, in connection with the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No . 3-18, and refer to the contractor for ~aid project SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA g~:~~ M)S A/C .... TKLR -~ and his liability insurance carrier for appropriate action ·····--·--···--···-·r2 9 > f\LE ......... ~--t 3 Q ) lETIER · ....• -/ A~ G->t:.·-·a --·--------·-·-·-····r31> ( 32) DISTRICT 3 Consideration o"f motion to adjourn to 7: 30 · p.m., May 29, 1975 11~ VI DisrrRICT 7 Verbal staff ~eport on acquisition of right of way re Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 11 and a Portion of Reach 12, Contract No. 7-6-7 DISTRICT 7 0th r busi items, DISTRICT 7 an SU agenda Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., May 29, 1975. ll: \5 -11- II ·' BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 812 7 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Cal if ., 92708 Telephones: . JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714 5'40-2910 962-2'411 AGENDA DISTRICT 3 SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS MAY 14, 1975 -7:30 P.M. (3) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from the City of Buena Park regardin g election of mayor and appointment of alternate to serve on the District's Board as follows: (*Mayor) . ALL DISTRICTS Active Jesse M. Davis Alternate Don R. Griffin* (9) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint ·operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund acco unts payable check registers for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing payment of c l a ims listed on page "I" (a) DISg?RIGg? 1 MHHtntB' if B::fiY (b) DISTRI CT 2 C.onsideration of motion approving warrant"s. See page uII" (c) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving warrants. See page "II" (d) DIS".PRIO'l'S J & 11 suope11oe fune. warra!'li5o, if any (e) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving war~ants. See page "II~' (f) DI STRICTS 5 & 6 Conside ration of motion approving suspense fund warrants. See page "II" (g) DIS".PRIGg? 6 warral'lto, if a!'ly (h) DI S TRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving warrants. See page · 11 III 11 '{ i) DIS'f'RIC'f' 11 ,,_an ante, if B:ny ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (16) (a) Staff report re telephone discussion Monday, May 12, with Ray Remy, Executive Director of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) relative to the Districts' position concerning d.esignation of SCAG as the planning element for the planning area described below. See page "IV" · (b). Further consideration of Districts' position opposing identification of a proposed "Sectin 208" areawide planning area described as: All of Orange County and those portions of Ventura, Los Angeles, Riverside and .San Bernardino Counties lying without the Santa Clara, Los An ge les and Santa Ana River Basins planning areas and that portion of Riverside County lying northwest of the Santa Marguerita River sub-basin and south of the Santa Ana River Basin planning area. DISTRlCT 1 (17) (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter . from B. J. Fibres, Inc., dated May 7, 1975, requesting waiver of delinquency and penalty fees re Connection and Use Ordinance No. 102. See page · "V" (b) Consideration of Resolution No .75-82 -1 (in f orm approved by General Counsel) authorizing waiver of delinquency and penalty fees assessed against B. J . Fibres, as · .recommended by the staff. ~ee page "VI" DISTRICT 5 (21) ·consideration of Resolution No . 75-81-5, approving inclusion of the City of Newport Beach as an additional member agency of the Newport -Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency (NIWA), with no conditions attached to such inclusion pursuant to Section 36 of the Joint Powers Agreement therefor. See page "VII" DISTRICT 3 (28) (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaintfo r Damages re Case No . 218569, Kenneth C. Young vs. County Sanitation District No . 3, et al ., relative to the Knott Interceptor , Reach 4, Contract No . 3-18, and refer to the Pistrict's General Counsel and l iab ility insurance carrier for appropriate acti on (b) Considerat ion of motion to receive , file and reject claim submitted by Southern California .Ediso n Company , dated · May 8, 1975, in· the amount of $1, 517 . 11, in connection with the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18, and refer to the contractor fo r said project ·and his liability insurance carrier for appropriate action -2- WARRANT NO. ~ 97 2";798 25799 25800 25801 25802 25803 25804 25805 . 25806 25807 25808 25809 ,. 25810 25811 25812 25813 25814 25815 2~816 25817 25818 ,_:25819 25820 25821 25822 25823 25824 25825 25826 25827 25828 25829 25830 25831 25832 25833 25834 25835 25836 25838 .25839 ·25840 25841 25842 25843 25844 25845 25846 25847 r '48 2';$49 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF AAA-Fremont Bag & Salvage, Sand Bags $ ABC Paint Striping Service, Striping· Acme Canvas Products, Filters Air California, Air Fare, Various Meetings Air Compressor Systems, Compressor Parts All Bearing Service, Inc.,. Chain, Belts & Seals Almquist Tool & Equipment, Tools Alpine Aromatics, Inc., Odor Control Chemicals Aljac Supply Company, Pipe Supplies American .Lock & Supply, Inc., Hardware City of Anaheim, Power . Anaheim Truck & Transfer Co., Freight Out Associated Concrete Products, Inc., Concrete AMSA, Seminar Registration Bancroft-Whitney Co., Government Codes Banning Battery Company, Batteries Barnes & Delaney, Conveyor Repair Beckman Instruments, Instrumentation Supplies Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair Thomas M. Blanda, Employee Mileage Bomar Magneto Service, Inc. , Magne_to Repair E. J. Brill, Technical Manual Broadlick~ Art Supply, Drafting Supplies The Brokerage, Equipment Rental Building News, Inc., Technical Manuals Burners and Controls, Inc., Controls C & R Reconditioning Company, Engine & Pump Repair CS Company, Valves Cadillac Plastic & Chemical Co., Tubing Cal's Cameras, Photo Supplies & Processing California Collator Sales, Binding &. Office Supplies John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Service, JPL ~lant Cash Electronics, Electronic Supplies Certified Laboratories, Lubricant Clark Dye Hardware, Tools Coast Insurance Agency, Auto Insurance Premium College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials Consolidated Electrical Distbrs., Electric Supplies Consolidated Bolt & Nut Co., Hardware Constructor's Supply Co., Tools & Hardware F. B. Cook Corp., Piping & PVC Repair Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Pa·rts Costa Mesa County Water District, Water Costa Mesa Datsun, Truck Parts County of Orange, Assessment List & Excavation Permit Crest Leasing, Vehicle Lease Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplies N. A. D'Arcy Company, Pump Parts c. R. Davis Supply Co., Hose Del Chemical Corp., Cleaner Marvin Derfler Co., Pump Parts Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling I-1 AMOUNT. 169.60 30.00 37.83 53.50 10.44 378.28 19.08 2,000.00 578.88 254.53 66.64 15.27 114.48 70.00 140.40 2?°3.09 83.35 2ts6.20 252.70 14.55 404.98 37.54 25.52 136.00 32.02 145.38 1,405.00 700.26 27.15 395.98 173.73 4,938.75 59.06 109.57 7.92 16.oo 558.34 1,832.03 162.38 575.58 1,804.29 364 .49 6.oo 39.95 1,270.40 llt7. 28 40.00 1,187.89 167.16 40.16 107.33 86.oo WARRANT NO. 25850 25851 25852 25853 25854 25855 25856 25857 25858 25859 25860 25861 25862 25863 25864 25865 25866 25867 25868 25869 25870 25871 25872 25873 25874 25875 25876 25877 25878 25879 25880 25881 25882 25883 25884 25885 25886 25887 25888 25889 25890 25891 25892 . 25893 25894 25895 25896 25897 25898 25899 25900 25901 25902 25903 IN FAVOR OF Diesel & Gas Turbine Progress, Engine Repair ·$ Dodge Truck, Inc., Truck Parts The Drawing Board, Inc., Forms Ducommun Metals & Supply Co., .Steel · Ida L. Duesberg, Employee Mileage Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Electric Balancing Co., Engine & Centrifuge Repair Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring Ensign Products Co., Oil · Enterprise Printing Company, Cover Stock Envirotech Corp., Clarifier Parts Fenwal Incorporated, Metering Supplies Fibre Glass Evercoat Co., Inc., Protectite Coatings Filter Supply Co., Filters Fischer & Porter Company, Pump Parts & .Strip Charts Fisher Controls Company, Regulator Parts City of Fountain Valley, Water Fountain Valley Medical Center, First Aid Supplies France Products Division, Engine & Compressor Repair Freeway Machine and Welding Shop, Machining Larry Fricker Company, Inc., Weed Killer City of Fullerton, Water Meter, Cont. 2-15 Gar Wood-Los Angeles Truck, Truck Parts Garden Grove Lumber & Cement Co., ·Building Materials General Electric Supply, Electric Supplies Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine Contract 1-1-75 General Telephone Company of Calif. Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage Goldenwest Fertilizer Co., Grit Removal W. W. Grainger, Inc., Electric Supplies Graybar Electric Co., Electric Supplies Groth Chevroiet Co., Truck Parts Charles G. Hardy, Inc., Hardware Harrington Industrial Plastics, Pipe Supplies Harrisons & Crosfield, JPL Chemicals Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal. Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease Hoffman's Nason Paint Store, Pa.int Supplies Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies, Hardware & Tools City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Equipment Rental Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware International Harvester Co., Truck Parts Irvine Ranch Water District, Water · Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supplies Kenron Industrial Supply, Tools King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, Seals & V-Belts Kingmann-White, Inc., Metering Supplies Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Hardware & .Tools L & N Uniforms Supply Co., Uniform Service t-2 AMOUNT 283.05 25.30 234 .48 '..,I 24.74 11.10 620.77 215.00 3,000.00 475.47 69.91 184 .. 97 72.58 196.80 140.04 1,512.48 685.27 4o.·oo 21.20 572.07 284.09 332.84 1,057.23 30.48 119.25 1,107.72 14,510.00 6,712.07 15.90 1,944.oo 50.94 323.57 20.95 128.89 168. 28 13,088.88 210.00 429.08 181.26 196.54 1,966.19 119.77 153.21 125.57 12.11 58.36 50.56 70.88 377.66 22.38 1,821.99 623.37 336.38 741. 25 '--" 1,612.78 WARRANT NO. 25904 25905 ~-106 ~07 25908 25909 25910 25911 25912 25913 25914 25915 25916 25917 25918 25919 25920 25921 25922 25923 25924 25925 25926 25927 25928 25929 25930 25931 25932 25933 25934 25935 25936 25937 25938 25939 25940 25941 25942 25943 25944 25945 25946 25947 . 25948 25949 25950 25951 25952 25953 25954 25955 2~956 ~157 IN FAVOR OF Larry's Bldg. Materials, Inc., Building Materials Lawless Detroit Diesel, Generator Repair Judy Lee, Employee Mileage Los Angeles.Chemical Company, .Pesticides Los Angeles Times, I. W. Ordinance Notice R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., Paving Materials McKesson Chemical Co., JPL Chemicals McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Hardware & Foam Master Blueprint & Supply; Printing Mine Safety Appliances Co., Testing Supplies Missimers Incorporated, Hardware Mitchell Manuals, Inc., Technical Manual Moltronics Division, Metering Supplies E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Ring & Cover J. Mosher, Employee Mileage Motorola, Inc .. , Mtce. Agreements Musick, Peeler & Garrett, Special Labor Counsel N. B. Products, Pipe Supplies National Lumber Supply, Hardware, Bldg. Mat'ls. & Tools Nelson-Dunn, Inc., Pump Parts· City of Newport Beach, Water C. Arthur Nisson, Legal Counsel Noland Paper Company, Reproduction Paper Oakite Products, Inc., Cleaner City of Orange, Water Orange Coast Hardwood, Building Materials Orange County Farm Supply Co., Insecticide Oreo Block Co., Inc., Building Materials Oreo Plastics, Tubing Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies Pacific Telephone Compahy Parker Supply Company, Regulators M. C. Patten.Corporation, Gauges Postmaster, Postage REA Express, JPL Freight Out Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal. Riccobon and Company, Printing Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts Routh Transportation, Oil Removal S & J·Chevrolet, Truck Parts Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Santa Ana Book Store, Inc., Technical Manual Santa Ana Dodge, Truck Parts Santa Ana Electric Motors, Pump Repair Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies Melvin Schwartz, M.D., Lateral Repair Scientific Products, Lab Suplies Seal Methods, Inc., Asbestos Robert Shaw Controls Co., Controls Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies John Sigler, Employee Mileage Fred Sinasek, Employee Mileage Soundcast Co.,. Pip~ S~pplies Southern California Edison Company I-3 $ AMOUNT 11.24 1,332.08 21.00 80.14 68.88 477.00 1,372.48 110.49 92.59 20.14 327.36 12·. 72 48.76 186.45 19.50 4,399.76 2,377.05 . ·6.03 163.19 26.25 558.75 2,107.00 44'"(. 76 249.52 18.53 .84.27 42.93 50.88 1+6.65 105.31 501+.79 150.73 361.04 1,000.00 3,202.46 62.00 572.24 1,598.73 180.75 40.63 22.79 51.91 8.80 869.00 203.87 487.50 121.86 165.78 29.22 951.36 56.94 60.48 563.67 47 ,068. 'r1 . . :\TARRANT NO • 25958 25959 25960 25961 25962 25963 25964 25965 25966 25967 25968 25969 25970 25971 25972 25973 259'f 4 25975 25976 2)977 25978 25979 25980 25981 25982 25983 25984 25985 25986 25987 25988 25989 25990 25991 25992 25993 25994 25995 25996 25997 25998 25999 26000 26001 26002 26003 26004 IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT So-Cal Sign Company, Traffic Signs $ 86.39 159.83 1,961.39~ 3.00 202.92 tn.41 897.85 1~4.97 5,663.11 70.00 553.99 480.18. South Orange Supply, Piping Supplies Southern California Gas Company Southern Ca~ifornia Water Company Space, Spring & Stamping Co., Hardware Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Concrete Material, Concrete Standard Oil Company of Calif., Oil, Gasoline & Diesel Supreme Steam, Carpet Cleaning J. Wayne Sylvester, Dir. of Finance, Petty Cash Reimb. T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Truck Parts · Bruce Tayl~r, Employee Mileage C. O. Thompson Petroleum Co., Kerosene Tiernan' s Office Equipment, Equipme.nt Repair Title Insurance & Trust Co., Lot Report Tony's Lock & Safe Service, Hardware TGrsion Balance Co., Equipment Repair Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Hardware Tustin Plumbing & Heating, Lateral Repair Union Oil Company of Calif., Gasoline United Auto Parts, Truck Parts United Parcel Service, Freight~Out United Reprographics, Inc., Printing United States Elevator Corp., Service Contract University of Calif. Extension, Technical Course Utilities. Supply Company, Equipment Parts VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies · Varec, Inc., Freight Paul Vukich, Employee Mileage Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage J9hn R. Waples, R. S~, Odor Consultant Washington Hilton, AMSA Lodging Water Pollution Control Federation, Conf. Registration Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts Weardco Construction Corp., Valve West Orange Publishing, I. W. Ordinance Notice Western Belting, Repair Materials Western Salt Company, Salt . Westinghouse Electric Corp., Electric Supplies Russell Wold, Employee Mileage Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel World Travel Bureau, Inc., Air Fare, Various Mtgs. Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Service Everett H. York Company, Filters Zodiac Paper Company, Blueprint Supplies TOTAL JOINT OPERATING I-4 49.62 74.73 42.47 30.00 170.45 9.42 109.60 131.21 150.00 49.16 90.82 55.16 460.07 27.00 92.00 35.93 85.90 18.82 8.10 35.82 219.90 326.49 130.00 2,639.87 2,980.00 45.36 140.51 108.24 443.19 80.52 1,160.50 1,359.66 1,269.64 133.56 388.07 $ 175,879.1.12 WARRANT NO. 2'l780 781 ~782 25783 25784 25785 25786 25787 25788 25789 25790 25791 2;5792 25793 , 25794 25795 25796 26005 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Aljac Supply Co., Power Saw John Carollo Engineers, Consultant Pl-16 Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16 Ecco Equipment Co., Motor Grader Henry Radio, Metering Equipment Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Mgmt. Pl-16 International Business Machine, Typewriters Motorola, Inc., Communication Equipment Olympic Sales, Calculator Peck Road Ford Truck Sales, Truck A-075 Pro-Tech, Inc., Portable Sampler The Register, Notice J-6-lB & E-074 Sargent Welch Scientific, Lab Equipment Smith Emery Company, Testing Pl-16 Southern Calif. Testing Lab., Testing Pl-16 Twining Laboratories, Testing Pl-16 VWR Scientific, Analyzer · Bomart Industries, Crane E-073. TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF I-5 AMOUNT $ 164.83 3,245.57 1,299,943.12 3,975.00 199.68 11,473.00 1,326.06 2,033.59 233.69 11, 622·. 26 1,630.00 109.38 572.40 468.00 152 .. 46 297.00 . 302 .10 14' 376.82 $1,352,124.96 $1,528,004.38 DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 25750 Precision Anodizing, Refund Permit Overpayment ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF $ '-" AMOUNT 70.30 25751 25752 25753 25754 25755 25756 25757 Alta Vista Country Club, Right of Way 2-17-1 $ 1,800.00 177,426.00 2,176.20 151,934.40 4,328.42 73,540.82 25758 25759 257()0 25·761 Bebek Company, Cont~actor 2-17-1 County of Orange, Inspection re 2-17-2 Mark Dakovich, Inc., Contractor 2-12R & 2-17-2 Grinnell Corporation, Valves 2-18 J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation, Contractor 2-15 Lowry and Associates, Engineering Services 2-12R,2-14-2, 2-14-3,2-14-4,2-14-5,2-15, 2-16-1, 2-17-1,2-17.-2,2-18 Orange County Flood Control District, Inspection re 2-14-1 Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 2-17-1 Southern California Testing Laboratory, Soils Testing 2-15 S. S. Zarubica, Contractor 2-18 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 25761A U-Stow-It Development Corporation, Refund Connection Fee II-1 43,156.50 174.21 234.00 47.10 182,683.04 $ 637,500.69 $ 220.00 $ 637,790.99 . . ~ WARRANT NO. .DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 3-18, 3-19, 3-20-1, AMOUNT 25762 25763 25764 2576.5 25766 25767 25768 3-20-2, 3-21-1, 3-21-2 $ 28,744.80 60,431.00 2,314.00 294.84 187,315.20 1,768.00 265,486.79 .Mike Prlich & Sons, Contractor 3-19 Smith Emery Co.mpany, Pipe Testing 3-20-1, 3-20-2 Southern California Testing Laboratory, Soils Testing 3-19 . Sully-Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 3-20-1 Testing Engineerings, Inc., Pipe Testing 3-19 & 3-20-1 A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Saliba, Contractor 3-18 & 3-20-1 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 25769 City of Fullerton, Refund Connection Fee DISTRICT NO. 5 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF ~5770 NIWA, 1974-75 Assessment 25778 25779 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Daily Pilot, Bid Notice PW-041 Rewes-Schock, Joint Venture, Contractor 5-14R-5R II-"2 $ 546,354.63 $ 250.00 $ 546,604.63 $ $ 2,000.QO 62.10 13,729.23 $ 13,791.33 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 25771 State of California, Annexation #45 Processing Fee 25772 Hilltop Investment, Refund Plan Check Overpayment 25773 25774 25775 25776 25777 FACILITIES REVOLVING 'FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 7-6-6 .McGuire Construction, Inc., Contractor 7-6-6 Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 7-6-6 The Tustin News, Bid Notice 7-6-7 George W. and Harriet Willis, Easement 7-6-6 III $ AMOUNT 85.00 1,640.00 $ 1,725.00 $ l",173.00 119,750.76 169.00 81.90 65.00 $ 121,239.66 $ i2·2,964.66 May 14, 1975 STAFF REPORT RE 208 PLANNING AREA DESIGNATION COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108'4'4 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71 '4) 540-2910 (71'4) 962-2411 On March 26, the Joint Boards adopted Resolution No. 75-50, supporting the position of th~ California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana ·Region, opposing the identification of a proposed "Section 208" planning area generally described as all of Orange County and. those portions of Ventura, Los .Angeles, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties lying within the Santa Clara, Los Angeles, and Santa Ana Rivers Basin planning areas. Reso- lution No. 75-50 requested identification of the area described as the Santiago Creek-Newport Bay Watershed for Section 208 planning and designation of an appropriate agency in the area to accomplish the plan. The State Water Resources. Control Board held hearings in Los Angeles on April 3rd relative to ~his matter; the -testimony was overwhelmingly in favor of a limited amount of designation. On April 30th, the State Water Resources Control Board held a workshop session relative to 208 planning grants in which most of the morning session was devoted to the discussion of the State Board's policy on these Federal planning grants. The Board is concerned with preiervation of local control of land use planning 8:nd was concerned that the Federal policy in "208 planning" made water quality problems a minor consideration and used these grants as a vehicle to impose comprehensive land use planning on local agencies. The State Board will make the designations tomorrow, May 15th, at a regular Board meeting at which time the State staff will recommend for or against 208 designations in the areas on which public hearings were held. The designations will be submitted to EPA Friday, May 16. On Monday, May 12, I received a call from Ray Remy, Executive Director of SCAG, suggesting that EPA may not approve of "postage stamp" areas in which local sentiment strongly favors 208 designation and EPA may insist that a broader designation be made. Mr. Remy suggested that the Directors may wish to consider this possibility a~d notwithstanding the Districts' current position of supporting the Regional Board calling for non-designation of the Santa Ana River Basin except for the Santiago Creek- Newport Bay Watershed. He asked that the Districts consider expanding their position to include that if State and Federal agencies do. move toward giving a 208 designation in the Santa Ana River Basin, first consideration should be given to local AGENDA ITEM #16(a) IV-1 ALL DISTRICTS May 14, 1975 Page 2 units of government which have implementation capabilit·ies .(cities, counties~ and special districts); however, if a broader designation is given, such as all of Orange County and portions of Ventura, Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, the Districts would not object to SCAG being designated provided that there are acceptable under- standings between SCAG and the implementing agencies which will pass through major amounts of money to do planning at the local level, and further, that maximum autonomies be given tq the local agencies and the operating agencies in the development of the planning process. AGENDA ITEM #16(a) ·Fred A. Harper General Manager IV-2 ALL DISTRICTS TELEPHONE 1714) '40-4650 : 1!4=3.S )j FIBRES INC. 2701 SOUTH llRCH STREET • POST OFFICE BOX 2072 •. SANTA ANA. CALIF. 92707 Mr Donald Winn, Joint Chairman Board of Directors May 7, 1975 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Ca 92708 Dear Mr Winn: At the request of John Thomas of your facility, we wish to bring to your attention our protest of a $J,639.57 late charge. Rather than review a rather lengthy episode, we have enclosed copies of all of our correspondence with the Districts. It is our feeling that much of this correspondence and subsequent late charges are completely unnecessary, especially in view of the fact that John Thomas, by his own admission, did not, as Mr Sylvester states, request us to pay under protest in order to avoid late charges. On the contrary, Mr Thomas indicated no urgency in paying the charge. In fact, he spent a great deal of his own time drawing up many comparative schedules in order to make sure that we were both in agreement with the charges, which we do appreciate. In view of the fact that we were not instructed to pay the charge in spite of protest, and the fact that we trusted that the people with whom we.were work~ng would handle the matter appropriately, we feel the interest charge to be unfair. It is certainly not the matter of the amount of the interest charge, for as your records will show, we have already paid an amount in excess of $50,000. We submit this protest for your perusal, and hope that, AGENDA ITEM #l7(a) V-1~ DISTRICT 1 CONSERV~S NATURAL RESOURCES~. RECLAMATION Of SECONDARY FIBRES Mr Donald Winn, May 7, 1975, pg 2 after reviewing this case, your office will take necessary action to relieve the threats of legal action as indi~ated by the enclosed correspo?dence. WJK: SS enc cc: J Wayne Sylvester John Thomas AGENDA ITEM #17(a) V-2 Very truly yours, / . _..-r;---. / ·j,, ·-;-,t Y"--:.......:...___., ~ c-·/_, .. ··cc, _ _,,,, WILLIAM J KEARNEY Administrative Manager DISTRICT 1 ... May 12, 1975 M E M 0 R A N D U M ---------- TO: DISTRICT 1 DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714') 962-24 11 RE: Request of BJ Fibres for Waiver of Delinquency and Penalty Fees Enclosed herewith please find a copy of a letter from BJ Fibres Inc. dated May 7, 1975, requesting waiver of penalty and delinquency charges assessed pursuant to Connection and Use Ordinance No. 102 (attached Exhibit 11 ~11 ). The Staff does not have authority under the ordinance to waive the charges as requested. However, other Districts.have, by resolution, granted waivers when circumstances have warranted it. This matter will, therefore~ be placed on the Supplemental Agenda for the regular meeting on Wednesday, May 14, for your consideration. Directors will .recall that a staff memorandum was received and filed at the February 19th meeting which outlined problems experienced with the discharges from BJ Fibres. Since that time, the company has installed equipment to improve the situation at considerable capital expense. Because of the extenuating circumstances, the staff recommends that the request for waiver of delinquency and penalty charges be approved (see attached Exhibit 11 G11 ). Following is a chronology of events regarding the above: Date 2-28-75 4-15-75 4-18-75 4-21-75 5-1-75 5-7-75 Explanation Invoice No. 75-2-1265 issued for use charges in amount of $36,375.67 Form letter re delinquency issued assessing $3,637.57 in charges pursuant to ordinance provisions Letter from BJ Fibres re delinquent charges District's letter advising BJ Fibres that.staff does not have authority to waiVe penalty charges District's form letter issued re delinquent penalties and assessing 1/2% pursuant to ordinance provisions Payment of invoice amount $36,375.67 received; penalty payment not received Letter issued by BJ Fibres requesting waiver 5-12-75 Staff recommendation JWS/cf Enclosures See Attached Exhibit "A" ''B'' ''C'' "D' I 11E11 ''F'' "GI I AGENDA ITEM #17(b) -VI-DISTRICT 1 RESOLUTION NO. 75-81-5 APPROVING MEMBERSHIP IN NIWA FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF .ORANGE COUNTY, CA~IFORNIA, APPROVING INCLUSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AS AN ADDITIONAL MEMBER AGENCY OF THE NEWPORT-IRVINE WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANNING AGENCY WITH NO CONDITIONS ATTACHED TO SUCH INCLUSION * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement dated March 28, 1975, the Newport-Irvine Waste Management Planning Agency (NIWA) has heretofore ·been created; and, .WHEREAS, the City of Newport Beach has requested inclusion as a party to said agreement and member of the Newport-Irvine Waste Management Planning Agency; and, WHEREAS, Section 36 of said agreement provides for admission of new members. NOW, T~EREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMit-;E, AN.D ORDER: Section 1. That inclusion of the City bf Newport Beach as an addition~l member agency of the Newport-Irvine Waste Management ·Planning Agency (NIWA) is hereby approved with no conditions attached to such inclusion, pursuant to Section 36 of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement creating said agency; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized to execute an addendum to said agreement authorizing inclusion of the City of Newport Beach, as provided in Section 1 hereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 14, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #21 -VII-DISTRICT 5 ,_ .. 4 -· RESOLUTIONS AND -SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS May 14, 1975 -7:30 p.m. .. COU:ffY SA:HTAT IO:~ I> I !;TJ~ J crs or ()J~A::Gn cou:zrY J>. o. Box 8127 -lOHH Ellb ,\vc·uuc 1: o u n ta in Va 11 c y , c.; a l i fo r n i a ~lZ 7 0 8 CJIA::GE OIU>ER C.O. NO. 5 co:atiACTOR: Donovan Construct ion Company of Minnc-sota DATE .... M .... a_y_! .... 4 .... ,-1 .... 9-75------. Arilount of this 'change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ o.oo In accoruancc with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract an<.l/or contract work arc hereby authorized and as co1:tpcnsation therefor, the fol~~wing. additions to or deductions from the contract price arc hereby approved. REFERENCES: State Water Resources Control Board letter dated March 17, 1975, CFR dated February 28, 1974 and February 11, ~974, Subpart E, Section 35.935-7 ·section 35. 93507, Subpart E, published in the Federal Register. is made a part of the contra~t which generally states the following: • • I., • • ' "The contractor must provide that representatives of the Envi.rorunental Protection Agency and the State will have access to work whenever it is in preparation or progress . and that thc·contractor will provide proper facilities for such' access and inspection. The contractor must als.o · provide that the Regional Administrator, the Comptroller General of the United States, ·or any authorized represen~ tative shall have access to anv books, documents, papers, and records of the contractor which are pertinent to the project for the purpose of making audit, examination, excerpts and transcriptions thereof." , No extension of time is allowed for this change order. Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes $ 29,876,000.00 $ ____ 1.1.., 0~1~2..;;... 5.;....o __ _ 0.00 This Chanec (ADD)(DEDUCT) $ ------~~~------ Hoard authorization date: ~tay 14, 1975 . By----------------------~-------~ Consulting Engineer By--------------------.,..---:----=--C on tractor Amended Contract Price $ 29,877,012.50 Approved: COUl~TY SJ\NITJ\TION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By------------~-----------------Clu c·f Enr. in cc AGENDA ITEM #lO(a) -;A-AtL DISTHICTS .. . · ·. Engineer's Estimate $12,000 . ... .• BID ·TABULATION SHEET Date May 6 ~ 1975 11:00 a.m. Contract For: THREE (3)· STAINLESS STEEL SLIDE GATES SPECIFICATION NO. E-074 CONTRACTOR . 1. Tatkin Company Los _Alamitos, California 2. Rodney Hunt Company Orange, Massachusetts 3. Armco Steel Corporation La Habra, California TOTAL BID $6,ooo.oo 11,150.00 12,424.oo It is recommended that award be made to Tatkin Company, Los Alamitos, California, in the amount of $6,ooo.oo plus tax. wn~ W. N. Clarke Superintendent ~ AGENDA ITEM #lO(c) -B-ALL DISTRICTS .. . ; RESOLUTION NO. 75-63 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 7S-48, APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR PILOT PLANT SERVICES BY CAL TECH (JPL), BY CHANGING TO NASA A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 75-48 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH CALIFORNIA .INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, JET PROPULSION LABORATORY, FOR SERVICES RE JPL REACTIVATED CARBON PILOT PLANT PROJECT, AND PROVIDING FOR CHANGE BY AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SAID AGREEMENT BETWEEN DISTRICT NO. 1 AND NASA * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, .2, 3, 5, 6, 1 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: That Section 1 of Resolution No~ 75-48, approving agreement with California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, is hereby amended to read as follows: "That the certain agreement dated by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 1 and 11 of Orange County and National Aeronautics and Space Administration -Pasadena Office, for services by California Institute of ~echnology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, in connec- tion with the JPL reactivated carbon wastewater treatment project, is hereby approved and accepted." PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meet~ng held M~y 14, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #lO(e) -C-ALL DISTRICTS RESOLUTION NO. 75-64 APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENT TO JOINT·POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING AN AaENCY TO BE KNOWN AS THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT AUTHORITY A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING DISTRICT NO. 1 TO EXECUTE A SECOND AMENDMENT TO JOINT ROWERS AGREEMENT CREATING AN AGENCY TO BE KNOWN AS THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT AUTHORITY WITH THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, VENTURA COUNTY, AND VENTURA REGIONAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Second Amendment To Joint Powers Agreement Creating An Agency To Be Known As The Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority, dated is he~eby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of· County Sanitation District No. 1, acting as agent for itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, is hereby authorized and directed to execute said amendment. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 14, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #lO(g) -D-ALL DISTRICTS , ~ H E. M I S T S TESTING INSPECTION ~NGINEERS SMITH-El\IERY COMPANY An Independent Commercial Testint Laboratory Established 1910 781 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD • LOS ANQELES, CALIFORNIA 90021 • (213) 749-3411 May 6, 1975 Mr. Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer Orange County Sanitation Districts P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. Lewis: During the past two months, Mr. Lou Perley of our staff has been in touch with you concerning the acquisition of the Los Angeles branch of Testing Engineers, Inc., by the Smith-Emery Company. The acquisition is now complete. Consistent with Mr. Perley's comments to you, Smith-Emery Company will meet all of TEI's client commitments without change in ser- vice, personnel or billing rates. Except for three job catagories the entire TEI staff and testing facility is now in the final stages of moving to a new location in Anaheim to form the Orange County branch of Smith-Emery. In addition to regular construction testing and inspec~ion, the Orange County operation will handle certain specialty services for Smith-Emery clients. Among those specialties will be pipe inspection, soils and radiography. Lou Perely will operate from the new facility and I will continue as Manager of the Orange operations. We are confident that with the added resources of Smith-Emery . Company and the relocation in Orange County, we will be able to expand our service capabilities to the Orange County Sanitation Districts. We look forward to continued service with you. f •• Very truly yours, SMITH -EMERY COMPANY J/~· ... -: ;. 11; :· -r. // .. ; ,. \.\... t t"c/// / 1. . ~;;/l('/c'! I' i Dennis McFadden Manager, Orange County DMcF:el AGENDA ITEM #lO(h) Smith-Emery ·company 3148-Q LaPalma Avenue Anaheim, California 92806 (714) 630-4.910 -E-ALL DISTRICTS PROGRESS REPORT TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS COUNTY SANITATION D·1sTR1cts of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFOR~A 927. (714l 540-2910. ~ (714) 962-2411 P2-20 -POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT PLANT NO. 2 -($158,294) Districts completing job. Low voltage room being painted. Pl-16 -46 MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 - ($29, 876, 000) Project work continues without major problems. The blower building lower floor has been completed. Main floor slab is presently under construction. Aeration basin structural work approximately 75% complete. Top deck slabs are presently being cast. Secondary clarifier can be considered 70% complete structurally. Center gallery and interior walls are now being built. Digesters numbers 9 & 10 walls are completed. Work is presently taking place in the digester control building area. Reinforced concrete pipe work has continued through th~ month. This work is approximately 50% complete. I (, Mechanical equipment delivery dates remain questionable at this time. Some delays can be ·expec~ed due to this equipment. PW -O 3 5 -ADD IT I 0 NA L B 0 I LE R FA C I LIT I E S AT PL ANT NO'. 2 - ( $ 3 9 , 0 4 7) Boiler in place. Boiler operating on digester gas. AGENDA ITEM #lO(j) F-1 ALL DISTRICTS ' . ; ,.....,, Progress Report Treatment Plants Page Two TREATMENT PLANT WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During April DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During April Total Work Under Design Total Work Out to Bid Total Work Awaiting Award COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 1084-4 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF~NIA 92708 (71-4) 540-2910 $30,073,342 12,530,605 1,263,943 $21,776,986 11 , 2.8 1 ' 1 0 2 1,090,398 10,088,068 17,000 357,218 (7J.4) 962-2·4°1 I $30,073,342 $21,776,986 10,088,068 17,000 357,218 TOTAL AMOUNT UNDER CONTRACT, DESIGN, AWAITING AWARD AND OUT TO BID $62,312,614 May 8, 1975 ,, AGENDA ITEM #lO(j) F-2 ALL DISTRICTS • . ' RESOLUTION NO. 75-65-2 APPROVING TEMPORARY RENTAL AGREEMENT WITH WOODBINE CORP. RE CONTRACT NO. 2-17-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF TEMPORARY RENTAL AGREEMENT WITH WOODBINE CORP. FOR RIGHT OF WAY RE CARBON CANYON-PALM DRIVE INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH 1, CONTRACT NO. 2-17-1 * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain temporary rental agreement dated April 17, 1975, wherein Woobine Corp. grants to County Sanitation District No. 2 the right to construct the Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer, Reach 1, Contract No. 2-17-1, through Woodbine Corp. right of way in the vicinity from Crowther Avenue to Palm Drive, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment in the amount of $1.00 for use of said right of way for a 90-day period from May 1, 1975, to August 1, 1975, is hereby authorized; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May l~, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #10(1) -G-DISTRICT 2 + .. .. / AG END ITEM lllO(m) -H- ··--; I I I ). •·'• 0: w ~ (/) er ~ / Q.. L&J 0 0: w ..... z 0:: LI.I > 0: <i z <I <I t-z <I (/) DISTRICT 2 LO ,... a.. ~ <( in :::!: a.. .>· i: ~ w ~ ~ er w a.. 0 er a.. > ll ~ 0 _, co< rY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY AND SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTH( ITY SANTA ANA REGIONAL INTE~CEPTOR La Palma & Grove Street to County Line OC:SWC PMJECT CO:<SiRiJCTIOIC ~ COST 2-14-3 ReaeheS z. 30 4 $ 3,397,000 2-1t-4 Reich 5 4.565,000 Z· 14-5 Ruches s. 7. I 2,249.000 H I TCTAU: $10.211,000 }-' OCs:> R!ver Crcssfng to5 1 000 $10,616,000 110m: PROJECT sm:o FOi! 3'J ~~D + E-0 FlOll Fli'll PIPE • CC~iSTl\UCiIOll COST TOTAL 1.:nrR u.srn OIS'l'RJCT Ste Rotes (1} and (2) $2,811,000 $2,530,000 $281 .ooo (90:) (10:) 4,061,000 3,817 .ooo 244,000 . <ml (6X) 1,934,000 1,93t,OOO -o- (10Di) (OX) $8,806,000 $8,281 .ooo $530,000 405 1 C:>O _-_o_-_ 405 ,000 $9,211,000 $8,281,000 $930,000 co~:STP.:iCTIO~f COST FOR DISTRICT'S OESIG.'t CRliERTA See Note (3) 586,000 . • 504,000 315,000 (1) Grant e11~fb1e costs to b! detena1ned on bash of a project sfzed for 30 MGO Oowfng full. (Z) Ptrcenta~es ca1cu1a~ed on bas1s of CIP-\tfty of each agency fn each Ruch. For exal:1)1e, i ir.e:i 30 !'"ftd Ruch 5: ~ • 6X, ITT9t • 94X. · (l} The,., h ro SAN'A p.rticfpatfon fn Ofst,.fct Desf~n Cr1te,.1a. Cost h dffftrenct between cost of Ou1gn PraJtct and ProJtct Sfzcd for 30 r.gd + E-0 Flow. t1 H en t-3 ::u H (") t-3 HLOCATIC:i OF TC.T:J.. CO';STRUCilO:C CO~TS lNCIOE:ITAl COSTS UPPER !f.SIN . D!STr\lCT TOTAL UPPER MSIN DISTRICT $2,530,000 $ 857,000 $ 350,000 $ 31 S,000 s 35,000 (90:) (10'.:) 3,817,000 ;~.ooo 563,000 529,000 34,000 (94:) (6X) 1,934,000 315,000 246,000 246,000 ·0- (100~) (Cl:) se.2s1.ooo $1,93C,OOO $1,159,000 $1.090,000· $ 69,000 __ -_o-_ to~.ooo 75,000 . _-_o-__ 75,000 SS,281 ,000 $2,335,CCO s1.2~.ooo $1 ,090,000 $144,000 RIGllT-O!'·WAY CAA.°':> TOTt.t.S TOTAL UPPER SASIN o:sTRICT TOTAL UPP:R !:.!:!:C ·0-·O· -0-$ 3.747 .ooo $2,845.000 s2~s.ooo $251 ,000 $17 ,OCO 5.405,000 4,507 .coo (S4X) (6:) 122.000 1n,ooo -0-2,617,000_ z.302.oco (100:) (Cl:) $400,000 $383,000 $17,000 Sl 1,770,000 S9,7S(,000 ceo 1000 -0- $12,250,CCO $9,754,0CO A;irtl zs. ms p!S~!C! . s 902,000 799,C~ 315,C".,O $2,016,<Y.lO csc.~~ S2,,!i5,C~ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108"'4 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 ' (714).540-2910 ~ May 8, 1975 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Name of Projects and Location: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER {in La Palma Avenue from Grove Street to Imperial Highway), and SOUTH SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONNECTOR {in Imperial Highway, from 300 1 South of Santa Ana Canyon Road to La Palma Avenue) Reaches 2, 3 & 4; CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER {lmperiaJ Highway to Gypsum Canyon Road) Reach 5, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER (Gypsum Canyon Road to Orange County Line) Reaches 6, 7 & 8, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-5 Entity or Person Undertaking Project: County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County and Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Staff Determination: (714) 96~-2411. ~· The Environmental Protection Agency, having undertaken and completed a study of these projects, has declared that an Environmental Impact Statement is not required for said projects, a copy of which determina- tion is attached hereto. Therefore, the District's staff, in accordance with Section 31. of the District's guidelines entitled "Local Guidelines Implementing the - California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Amended'', for the purpose of ascertaining whether the proposed project might have a significant effect on the environment, has· reached the following conclusion: The project could not have a significant effec~ on the environment; therefore, a negative declaration should be prepared. . d!d l/.·Jl~ Fred A. Harper General Manager AGENDA ITEM #lO(n)(l) I-2 DISTRICT 2 . ' ( ( r· UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 100 CALIFORNIA STRCET SAN FRANCISCO. CALIFORNIA 94111 FEB 2-7 1975 To All Interested Agencies and Public Groups · Gentlemen: In accordance with the procedures for the preparation of environmental impc.ct state:nents, an environmental review· has been performed on the pro- posed Agency action below: Official P;roject Name: Purpose of Project: Applicant: Location: Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reaches III & iV To provide an economiccl disposal met~od. for high-salinity wastes that would cthen·:ise degrc.de the ground ·water of the Upper S?.::ita Ana Basin Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority In northeastern Orange County starting at th::: Grove Street-La Palma AveDue intersection and heading up the Santa Ana Canyon to the San Bernardino County line, continuing through the County north of the Santa A~a River for approximately 4, 000 feet to the Riverside County line, and continuing in Riversice Cou~ty through the Prado Dam to ~erminate ·apprn:d- ,, mately 2, 000 feet no:rth of the dam. Estimated FecJeral Financial Share: $5, 822, 738 (February 1974) Estimaied State und Local Financial Share: $1, 940, 912 (February 197l:) I' EXHIBIT E -Page 1 of 4 AGENDA ITEM #lO(n)(l) I-3 DISTRICT~. • I . ·. ~~· .. -2- After performing an environmental review of the project, this Agency has decided that an environmental impact .statement is not required .. An 'environmental impact appraisal, which summarizes the review and the reasons why a statement is not required, is on file at the above office and is available for the public scrutiny upon request. Sinq)erely. · . -· ... /1·· -· . .' I , ' ; .f • /.. • I I ..... ~ ..... ~ ;.G %.tf.j t I P 1 De Falco, Jr.· · f ;egional Administrator / \ .. .. i! · EXHIBIT E -Page 2 of 4 AGENDA ITEM #lO(n)(l)· I-4 DISTRICT 2 ' :4 -·~· .. r·". California Distribution List 1. State Water Resources Control Board Division of Water Quality Control 1416 Ninth Street Sacramento CA 95814 2. Office of Intergovernmental Management State Clearinghouse 1400 Tenth Street, Room 108 Sacramento CA 95814 . r· 3. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC 20460 Office of Federal Activities Office of Public Affairs Office of Water Programs, Planning & Interagency Program Division Office of Congressional Affairs · Office of Congressional & Intergovernmental Relations, Region IX 4. Southern California Association of Governments .1111 \Vest Sixth Street, #401 Los Angeles CA 90017 5. State of California Air Resources Board Attention: Bill Lockett . 1709 -11th Street Sacramento CA 95814 6. Orange County Sanitation Distrkt Attention: Fred Harper P .0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley CA 92708 ,, 7. Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Attention: Robert Moore 7150 Brock.ton Avenue Riverside CA 92505 8. Howard Anderson 4465 Ninth Street Riverside Cl~ 92501 I .' EXHIBIT E -Page 3 of 4 AGENDA ITEM #lO(n)(l) I-5 DISTRICT·2 . . . . -2- ·g. Environmental Improvement Agency Attention: James DeAguiler-a County of San Bernardino 316 Mountain View San Bernardino CA 92415 10. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region 6833 Indiana Avenue, Suite 1 Riverside CA 92506 I' EXHIBIT E -Page 4 of 4 AGENDA ITEM #lO(n)(l) I-6 . ~· DISTRICT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 75-80-2 MAKING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE REACH 3 OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE THEREOF A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, MAKING NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR, REACH 3, PURSUANT TO DETERMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE THEREOF * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER: Section 1. That the projects concerning which this determination is made are described as follows: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER (in La Palma Avenue from Grove Street to Imperial Highway), and SOUTH SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONNECTOR (in Imperial Highway, from 300' South of Santa Ana Canyon Road to La Palma Avenue) Reaches 2, 3 & 4, and SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER (Imperial Highway to Gypsum Canyon Road) Reach 5, and · SANTA ANA CANYON INTERCEPTOR SEWER (Gypsum Canyon Road to Orange County Line) Reaches 6, 7 & 8 Section 2. Pursuant to the study of the environmental effects of said Projects, undertaken and completed by the Environmental Protection Agency, which said agency has determined that said Projects do not require an Environmental Impact Statement, said determination having been reviewed by this Board; and, AGENDA ITEM #10(n)(2) I-7 . DISTRICT 2 Section 3. That, for the reasons enumerated in Section 2, it is hereby found that said Project will not have a significant effect upon the environment; and, Section 4. That the Secretary be, and he is hereby, authorized and instructed to file a certified copy of this resolution and of the aforesaid initial study at the District office to be available for public inspection and copying. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular.meeting held May 14, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #10(n)(2). I-8 DISTRICT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 75-66-2 . APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR AND SOUTH SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONNECTOR, REACHES 2, 3 & 4, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANTA ANA RIVER INTER- CEPTOR AND SOUTH SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONNECTOR, REACHES 2, 3 & 4, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3 * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, .DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day" submitted to the Board of Directors by Lowry & Associates, District's eng{neers, for construction of the SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER (in La Palma Avenue from Grove Street to Imperial Highway) AND SOUTH SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONNECTOR (i~ Imperial Highway, from 300' South of Santa Ana Canyon Road to La Palma Avenue), REACHES 2, 3 & 4, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3, ~re hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the bid date upon receipt of approval from the State Water Resources Control Board, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 14, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #10(ri)(3) -J-DISTRICT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 75-67-2 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH 5, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANTA ANA RIVER INTER- CEPTOR, REACH 5, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4 * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Lowry & Associates, District's engineers, for construction of the SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER (Imperial Highway to Gypsum Canyon Road), REACH 5, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the bid date upon receipt of approval from the State Water Resources Control Board, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said wor~ pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 14, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #10(n)(3) -K-DISTRICT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 75-68-2 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACHES 6, 7 & 8, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-5 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANTA ANA RIVER INTER- CEPTOR SEWER, REACHES 6, 7 & 8, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-5 * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District .No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Lowry & Associates, District's engineers, for construction of the· SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER (Gypsum Canyon Road to Orange County L'ine), REACHES 6, 7 & 8, CONT:RACT NO. 2-14-5, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the bid date upon receipt of approval from the State Water Resources Control Board, at which time said bids will be publicly· opened and read; and, Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of .the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a ·regular meeting held May 14, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #10(n)(3) -L-DISTRICT 2 cou:rrY SA: 11 TATI o:~ 1>1 !;T1~ r crs or rn~A::r. E cou::TY P. O. Box Ul~7 -10\lH Elli:; Avenue Fount a in Va 11 c y ~. c.; a l i fo i-n i a ~J 2 7 0 8 .. CllA~GE OIWER C. O. NO. 1 co:ffRACTOR: MARK DAKOVIQf, INC.· --~--~~~--~~~-I> ATE _May 1, 1975 JOU: . YORBA LINDA FORCE MAIN INVESTIGATION, COOTRACT NO. 2-12R Amount of this Chanllc Order (X~~).) (DEDUCT) $ 12,850.00 In acc·ordance with contrac·t prpvi s ions, the following changes in the con~rac t arnl/ or contract work arc her ch)' author i z c<l an<l as co1;ipcnsa t ion . therefor, the followi·ng additions to or deductions· from the contract price arc hereby approved. AnJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES DEDUCT: Item Change Est'd·Quantities ..!!E..:.. Unit From To Di f fercnce· 2 4 L •. s. FEET 1 20 Extension of Contract Time 0 0 20 @ 1, 250/L.S .• @ 580/Ft. 1UI' AL DEDUCT 1,250.00 11,600. 00 12,850.00 T.he. Contractor is.hereby granted an extension of time due to scheduling requirements set by the Department of Transportation 7 Calendar Days TOTAL TIME EXTENSION 7 Calendar Dap Summary of Contract Time Original Contract Date' Original C_ontract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension This Change Order Total Extension of Contract Time Revised Contract Time . ·Revised Completion Date Hoard authorization date: M · 14 1975 ay J By------------------~--~--~~ co·nsult ing lfo~ rnccr , By------------------~~~::-;:-::-= Contractor ft~F.Nnn T~RM #lO(o) March 6 1 1975 30 Calendar Days April 5:, 1975. 7 Calendar Days 7 Calendar Days 37 Calendar Days April 12, 1975 Original Contract Price $ 24,200.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ o.oo This Chan:ge 0\~lN) (DEDUCT) $ 12,850.00 Amended Contract Price s 11,350.00 ·-M- Approve<l: . COUNTY SJ\NITJ\TIO~J l>ISTRICTS of Orange County, California By---------------~--.,.,,-.....-l""""""T--~-:-::-: Cine[ l:ngincc: DISTRICT 2 ,...,,,,_, RESOLUTION NO. 75-69-2 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-12R as COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-12R AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Mark Dakovich, Inc., has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for. YORBA LINDA FORCE MAIN INVESTIGATION, CONTRACT NO. 2-12R, on the 12th day of April, 1975; and, Section 2. That by letter, Lowry & Associates, District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the Districts has con- curred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That Yorba Linda Force Main Investigation, Contract No. 2-12R, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 6th day of March, i975; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Mark Dakovich, Inc., setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Yorba Linda Force Main Investigation, Contract No. 2-12R, is hereby approved; and, Section 7.· That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 14, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #lO(p) -N-DIST RICT 2· TO: FROM: MEMORANDUM May 8, 1975 Fred A. Harper, General Manager Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer COUNTY SANITATION DiSTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108.C-4 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9270f (71.C) 5.C0-2910 ~ (7 J.4) 962-2.C 11 SUBJECT: Yorba Linda Pump Station, Contract No. 2-15 P.lacement of concrete has been completed for walls and motor room floor. Installation of PVC liner plate in wet well has been completed. Further installation of PVC liner plate has been suspended pending qualification of PVC welders. The Contractor is in the process of removing forms. REL: BEW: TR·:· ss _,, AGENDA ITEM #lO(s) -0-DISTRICT 2 TO: FROM: MEMORANDUM May 8, 1975 Fred A. Harper, General Manager ~ay E. Lewis, Chief Engineer COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 108-44' ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORN« 92708 <i1 .. > s.so-291 o (714') 962-2-411 SUBJECT: Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor S~wer, Reach 1 Contract No. 2-17-1 Pipe installation has been completed from Alta Vista to Station 135+88 which is just south of Palm Drive. Backfill operations are in progress. Tunnel operations have been completed under Alta Vista. Pipe installation has been scheduled for this month. The Contractor estimates completing clay pipe installation in two weeks. Upon completion of clay pipe installation, work will begin with installation of RCP just south of Alta Vista. The Contractor estimates beginning tunnel operations under the Santa Fe Railroad at Crowther Avenue. REL: BEW: TR: ss ·'' AGENDA ITEM #lO(s) P-1 DISTRICT 2 t-Q I l\J d H (fl i-3 ~· H 0 i-3 PROPOSEO P4L.M OR/VG INT£,€CEPTO~ ·--·. ~----==========:::t--~-- -------CPmp (efc_ · ••••I• ... · 10 be. con~lrv~ /.et! C a,-bon (on yon -Palm lJrive /11/e,.tep/.or 5'ew~r Reach 1 •. /,'2·"';/~s "f ~9"' ~{, .. f'fe Lon .fr~c../ .4war-d~:I: 1'2-J/-14 "' . . C a~J·: fl 117, I 41 !~ 5chedf./I~ I C.~u·~1f 1~/.1~11: 6·11 ,_ ( ( TO: FROM: SUBJECT: M E M 0 R A N D. U M May 8, 1975 Fred A. Harper, General Manager Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer CouNTY SANITATION D1s.TR1crs of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71.C) 540-2910 (71.C) 962-2.Cl I Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer, Reach 2, Carbon Canyon Channel to Kraemer Boulevard, Contract No. 2-17-2 Installation of VCP is complete to Station 178+00 which is just past Cypress ?oint Drive on Palm Drive. Backfill and base paving is complete to Station 176+00 just east of Cypress Avenue. A minor problem existed on Palm Drive between Valencia Avenue and Angelina. The problem was from the Contractor breaking A.C. paving. Residents felt the vibrations would cause damage to pools, block walls and homes. The District and the City of Placentia agreed that no damage would result from the method of breaking A.C. paving on Palm Drive. The Contractor estimates pipe installation to be slow this month while passing a Pacific Telephone vault and conduit. ,, REL:BEW:TR:ss I' AGENDA ITEM #lO(s) Q-1 DISTRICT 2 )> 0 t7l 0 )> H 8 t7l 3: D I f\.) I\) .. Comflele :• •• •• It; he Cons /,,.1.1c..f.ed ( I > ~ Ca,. b1111 [;;,,yo/J -/6 /,,,,., Or1Ye /,, /erce,Plor 5'c#~l'1 f<,:-c;ch Z C tJn!rttcl A/o, ·2-1'1-Z a: 0 '% ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 cc )( 0 ix: er: a ~ ~ ~ -J • Q::'. er a tu v MO~SE AV \ 1 mile ·~.f 39" pipe CMlrr1c/ CJn{?r-~cd •· v.::: 1/1 74 Cos I: Jf 539,. 4:SZ Gdedi./led-6r t(,,yflclon, ~N 2~, ·~5 ( TO: . FROM: MEMORANDUM May 8, 1975 Fred A. Harper, General Manager Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108'4'4 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71.C) 5'40-2910 (71'4) 962-2411 SUBJECT: Carbon Canyon Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-18 All·RCP has been installed. Backfilling operations have been completed. The structure at Mira Loma is under construction. The structure at the end of the project on Crowther is under construction,· All work on La Palma Avenue from Grove Street to Miller Avenue has· been completed and paved. Traffic has been returned to normal. Pipe "installation was slowed due to numerous old roads under .Crowther Avenue. The roads were not shown ·on the plans. REL:BEW:TR: SS AGENDA ITEM #lO(s) R-1 DISTRICT 2 ~ 0 trl z t:1 ~ H 1-3 trl ~ ~ I-' 0 ,......... Ul ~ ~ COMPLETE • I I. I I. TO BE CONSTRUCTED ( CARBON CMlYON I NTERC EPTOR SEWER LA PALMA AVENUE TO CRO't/THER AVENGE CONTRACT NO. 2-18 1 • 3 Mi LES Of 66\ I & 39" p I PE CONTRACT A~AROEO JUNE 2i, 1974 COST: $1,472,160 SCHEDULED TOR COMPLETION FEBRUARY, 1975 ~ ( RESOLUTION NO. 75-71-3 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 25, 26 & PORTION OF 27, CONTRACT NO. 3-21-1, A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF.DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WESTSIDE RELIEF INTER- CEPTOR, REACHES 25., 26 & PORTION OF 27, CONTRACT NO. 3-21-1, AND APPROVING SAID PROJECT * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County S~nitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed.plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering Corporation, District's Engineers, for construction of WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 25, 26 & PORTION OF 27, CONTRACT NO. 3-21-1, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That said project is hereby approved, and that the Secretary be directed to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with the Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 4. That said bids will be r~ceived unt~l 11:00 a.m., June 3, 1975, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 14, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #lO(t) -S-DISTRICT 3 COUiffY SA:lITATIO:~ J>I!iTl~JCTS OF CWA:!GE cou:;ry ·p. O. Box 8127 -lOHH Elli:; ,\vt'uuc 1: o u n .ta in Va p C: y ; Cali fo r n i a !> 2 7 0 8 CllANGE OIU>ER A.G. Tutor Co., Inc. and N.M. Saliba C~., CON'fn.ACTOR: A Joint Venture C.O. NO. 10 --~-----~~----------DATE May 14. 1975 JOB: ICNOTI INTERCEPTOR, REACH 4, CONTRACT NO. 3-18 ----------~~~~~--.-;~~~__;;.._ __ ~~~~--~~~--~------~----~--~--------- Amount of this Change Order (AUD) (DEDUCT) $ o.oo In nccor<lancc with contract provisions, the following changes in the .contract an<l/or contract work arc hcrpby nuthorizc<l and as c01:lpcnsation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the.contract price arc hereby approved. REFERENCES: State Water Resources Control Board letter dated March 17, 1975, CFR dated February 28, 1974 and February 11, 1974, Subpart E, Section 35.935-7 · i Section 35. 93507, Subpart E, published in the Federal Register. is made a part of the contract which generally states the following: . . . . "The contractor must provide that representatives of the Environmental Protection Agency and the State will have a·ccess to work whenever it is in preparation or progress . . and that the contractor will provide proper ·facilities for such access and inspection. The contractor must also· provide that the Regional Administrator, the Comptro.ller .General of the United States, ·or any authorized represen-: tative shall have access to any books, documents, papers, and records of the contractor which are pertinent to the project for the purpose of making audit, examination, ·excerpts and transcriptions thereof." , No extension of time is allowed for this change order. Original Contract Price Prcv. Auth. Changes $4,334,412.00 $ 20,783.27 --~----- This Channc (AI?D) (DEDUCT) $ O. 00 Board authorization date: May 14, 1975 By _________________ __._,,..-_..,..--.---- Con s ult 1ng Engineer By __________________ -"1'"'~-:'.~:-=-:~ Contractor AGENDA ITEM #lO(u) Amended Contract Price $ 4, 383, 94 9. 27 ·-T- Approved: COUNTY SJ\NITATIOiJ DISTRICTS of ·Orange Co.unty, California By ____ ~----~-------....w--..--.--------~ Clucl Lnr,rncc1 DisrrRICT 3 RESOLUTION NO. 75-72-3 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH GULF OIL COMPANY A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH GULF OIL COMPANY FOR RELOCATION OF 12-INCH OIL LINE RE KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 5 & 6, CONTRACT NO. 3-20-1 * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, Gulf Oil Company possesses a franchise right to maintain an oil transmission line in Knott Avenue, a public right of way in the City of Westminster; and, WHEREAS, said oil line must be relocated in order to construct the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 & 6. NOW THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County agrees to share in the cost of relocation of 670 lineal feet of 12-inch oil line in connection with construction of .the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 & 6, Contract No. 3-20-1; and, Section 2. That the cost for said relocation is to be shared between County Sanitation District No. 3. and Gulf Oil Company in a total amount not to exceed $10,000.00 for the District's share; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute an agreement on behalf of the District in form approved by the General Counsel, in accordance with the terms of this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regu~ar meeting held May 14, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #lO(v) -U-DISTRICT 3 Cournv SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 ... .. . 108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE j<:. · FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORN-92708 ..... <11"'> 5.co-2910 ro·: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM May 8, 1975 Fred A •. H~rper, General Manager Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18 Tunnel operations have been completed. All pipe has been installed and grouted. (71~) 962-2.C 11 Pipe installation on Westminster Avenue and Goldenwest curve is complete and backfilled. The manhole on Westminster Avenue at Station 416+00 has been stacked and backfilled. The contractor expects to begin work on the siphon at Edwards and· Westminster Avenue this month. All underground pipe from the intersection of Newland and Bolsa to Main Street and Goldenwest has been accepted. Clean-up operations are in progress at the intersection of Westminster. and Goldenwest. Contractor estimates one mont~-0f work to connect existing pipe to tunnels. REL:BEW:TR:ss AGENDA ITEM #lO(w) V-1 DISTRICT 3 :x::o 0 -·"'~,,__ __ ---------·----- z .. tJ ·. -::t>'. <: I ·I\) '- I 0 .. ~. H en 1-3 :::0 H 0 t-3 w .·.,,, ·, --···· ------· -·----·-·-:·--·-·· -··---.-·-· -·-_ .. _ ----._ ......... ---· CONTr<ACT ~~-ts~ kNOiT lNTe1<CrPTO~ COMt:::iu=·if • 0 0 ~ e io Be' CON'ST~(.)Cjfe .•. ---·--.. .4,.·,~ •• ·--·-.-... --.. --- ~A\IE'..A...-' _ ___,, L 0 8 3 g ·. W~TMtN5TC"r< . M~MD.<IAI.. .. . PA~K WC:-SiM\N Si~ COUN'TY OF O~AN6E" ~ Ui ~ ~ • -"' ~ z ti) . ·. :; § ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ lOR~~ f>, ·-. I . Lf6C'"ND - i ' \ . -. ~ k'NOiT INi~~CN'iO~ 3 M1Lr;5 oF ~~·· PtPe' CONTt:Z']~T AWA'Z..D,e-D: f0-1-"'1? CO'Si; ~ ~ ~"?.q, 4 l-Z. -SCl-lfOUL~JFO~ COMPl.~TlON: 9-l-i4 -----... _________ ~---·-··----··--·-. -·---· ... ·--.. -----··· ·--· ......... __ ---.-.. ....... -·-·------·-----------·· ·-------·-·-·· ( ( J , i ~. TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM May 8, 1975 Fred A. Harper, General Manager Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer GouNTY SANITATION D1sTR1crs of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108 ...... ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAiN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71 ... ) 5 ... 0-2910 (71 ... ) 962-2411 Imperial Relief Interceptor, Reaches 22 & 23 Contract No. 3-19 All VCP has been installed except under Harbor Boulevard. Installation of casing under Harbor Boulevard is complete. Pipe installation should begin this month. Boring operations have been slow under Harbor Boulevard due to unforeseen water conditions. Contractor working on installation of manhole just west of Harbor Boulevard. Contractor expects to complete all work by the first of June. As per State standards, east bound traffic is limited to one lane from 7 A.M. to 2 P.M. After 2 P.M., east bound traffic is returned to two lanes of traffic. REL:BEW:TR:ss AGENDA ITEM #lO(w) W-1 DISTRICT 3 ~ I !\..) t:1 H en 1-3 ::u H 0 1-3 w _J ~-M_A_...S__,_R A__...__,· 11 BL VO '' --~II.._ _ ___.I .__I -~II_.. L_A --..H A_8_RA ___ , , BL v () II'-___ __,t;I L· 0 "::> .J LAMBERT 0 :r < 0 -------- IMPERIAL ~~rR;~~~m~-~-CTiiiiiiiiiiiiDmci,~¥-~· aiiDiiimiiiiim:aPPA~R;K~W;O~O;D~.~~~:;;:EJl~-~.~!5!~~!!i!i~~~~~~!ij!~~!!!!!:zn~nm--•6.~~~~~~-JE_C_T_.--, SANOELWOOD AV/2 z COMPLETE r 7r IMPERIAL RELIEF INTERCEPTOR REACHES 22 & 23 CONTRACT NO. 3-19 • e I I I • 8 TO BE CONSTRUCTED ( 1.4 MILES OF 24 11 , 21 11 , & 18 11 PIPE CONTRACT AWARDED: OCTOBER 7, 1974 COST: $778,372 SCHEDULED FO~ COMPLETION APRIL, 1975 ( M E M. 0 R A N D U M May 8, 1975. TO: ·r Fred A.· Harper, General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNI, 92708 (71.C) 5'40-2910 (71.C) 962-2.Cl I SUBJECT: Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 and 6, Contract No. 3-20-1 Pipe installation is complete up to Station 417+00 (Fenway Drive).· Backfill operations in progress. Base paving operations are complete up to Wyoming Street. The Contractor expects to install 11000' of base paving this month. RCP to be installed across 21st Street this month. 20' of steel liner.plate has been installed in tunnel under Garden Grove Freeway. The Contractor estimates installing 80' of RCP per day. Traffic is hampered on Goldenwest from Westminster Avenue to Garden Grove Boulevard due to construction and storage of materials. All efforts have been made to alleviate traffic problems. One lane south bound and one lane north bound on Goldenwest fro~ Westminster Avenue to Garden G.rove Boulevard exists 'at this time. REL:BEW:TR:ss AGENDA ITEM #lO(w) X-1 . DISTRICT 3 Et)WAR 2: c ~ ~ 0 t:1 H en 1-3 ::u H 0 1-3 w r -c )> . ~ GOLDEN WEST_~·~ _ ~ rn tJ> ; > z (/\ -t m :x> Cl> rl -I ~ -t lJ) M -t )> r <It x )> ~ :i < C,mp!ele "°. 14. ro /;e Ccnsln.1c-kd' ~....__Sx.:P~R~1.!:!.N.=..G D::.:;A;;:..::\..:.:E;;_ ____ ~l ""'"1 _s_,._. __ II._------._ ___ -t fJ) co .- < 0 . C1' 1'1 r G" ;r1 ~ ~ ff1 ~-KN(')T\. ~. ~ AV. _ .·.··~~~~--~~: ... ~4f.4Hi!'if+¢ .I sovT~ERN -=!J=.--1 7-.--Jf.:::=:==-- k'no--/-1 lnlerc~plor Reaches ·5 t 6 Conlroc! Af~-,, 3-2tJ-f r- )> > -0 V> 0 z: )> < WE: STERN AV. RR ~ z -c 0 z n :z: )> z z r1l r ·-__ ....... -........... . ____ . _____ ::..._ __ . __ ,.. ____ ..... _ .. _ -·-· '·---·-·-----·-.. ·----·--·--·--~--------.. ~-----· ( --. :x> 0 trl z t:I :x> H 1-3 trl ~ ::;t:: 1--' 0 ........... ~ ....._,, I ....:: '.I t:I H en 1-3 ::::d H 0 1-3. w ( (') -< -0 0 -.,., SEGIH 11 ------•.Complete ~To be constructed "'O ;i,. ;io ~ 0 -4 Q -< 1l .JI: ~ I) Ill -~~=====--~ "'""'-""""' OJ ~ l> n c -' "1 '"1'1 z_ -< )> L\ > \ ~ ~ \ ~ x. ~ r ~ r<t-t~"'T""T" i KNOTr n;~ERCEPTOR Portion of Reach 7 Contract No. 3-20-2 ~ . ( - ... Ii "" 0 J . AVMo-. ID ' 2·M1les of 72", 66", 63" pipe Cost: $3,876,870 . Contractor: Tutor-Saliba' Contract Awarded: 5/6/75 Scheduled for completion: 5/6/76 RESOLUTION NO. 75-73-5 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WET WELL REPAIR AND REMODELING AT 14TH STREET AND "A" STREE'l.1 PUMPING S'I1ATIONS 1 CONTRACT NO. 5-14R-6 - A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING .PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WET WELL REPAIR AND REMODELING AT 14TH STREET AND "A" STREET PUMPING STATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 5-14R-6 * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: .Section 1. That the detailed plans, sp~cifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by the District's Chief Engineer for construction of WET WELL REPAIR AND REMODELING AT 14TH STREET AND "A" STREET PUMPING STATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 5-14R-6, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be ~uthorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the ·Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m., May 20, 1975, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and District's Chief Engineer be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors; and, .section 5. That the General Manager be authorized and directed to award the contract f.or said work to the lowest responsible bidder, and to execute said· contract on behalf of the District in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 14, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #lQ_W -Z-DISTRICT 5 RESOLUTION NO. 75-74 APPROVING AWARD OF SPECIFICATION NO. PW-041 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF · COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AWARD. OF ECCENTRIC PLUG VALVE INSTALLATION, PRESSURE TRUNK "B", DISTRICTS 5 & 6, SPECI- FICATION NO. PW-041 . * * * * * * * * * * *· *. The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange Co~nty, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Secti0n 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to F. T. ZIEBARTH CO. for ECCENTRIC PLUG VALVE INSTALLATION, PRESSURE TRUNK "B", DISTRICTS 5 & 6, SPECIFICATION NO. PW-041, tabulation of bids, ·and the proposal for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That award of contract to F. T. Ziebarth Co. in the total amount of $7,400.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, be approved; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of Dis~rict No. 5 are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor, on behalf of itself and District No. 6; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 14, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #lO(z) -AA-DISTRICTS 5 & 6 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $5,000.00 B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N SHEET Date May 6, 1975 -11:00 A.M. Contract For: ~CCENTRIC PLUG VALVE INSTALLATION PRESSURE TRUNK "B" 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 8. 9. 10. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 SPECIFICATION NO. PW-041 CONTRACTOR F. T. Ziebarth Co~ Fullerton S. J. Burkhardt Contracting Buena Park ,, AGENDA ITEM #lO(z) -BB- TOTAL BID $7,400.00 $11,800.00 DISTRICTS. 5 & 6 ·' ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $480, 272·. 00 BID T A B U L A T I 0 N SHEET ' Contract For: .TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER . REACHES 11 AND POITTION OF 12 1. 2. CONTRACf· NO. 7-6-7 CONTRACTOR Rogers & Davies Ontario Brage Construction Company, Inc. Diamond Bar 3. Robert L. Berard Westminster 4. Risto Construction Company, Inc. Arcadia 5. DeVries & Spiess Construction Company La Canada 6. A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Co. North Hollywood 7. Young & Associates, Inc. Los Angeles 8. Colich Construction Los Angeles 9. Hensen Construction Inc. Bell Gardens 10 •Salata, Inc. · Upland 11. A. S. Pcich, Inc. Pomona ,,· Date May 6, 1975 -11:00 A.M. TOTAL BID $349,818.00 . $353,770.00 $374,489.00 $395,693.00 $397,593.00 $398,436.00 $411,330.00 $421,~74.90 $442,864.00 $446, 772. 00 AGENDA ITEM #lO(bbt CC-1 $450,868.00 DISTRICT 7 .. , ·.BID TABULATION SHEET Date May 6, 1975 -11:00 A.M. Contract For: TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, REACHES 11 AND PORTION Of 12, CONTRACI' NO. Continued ....... .. 7-6-7 12. Pennsylvania Pipeline, Inc. ~ Torrance $458,593.00 13. Meyer-AJ Pipeline Co. San Bernardino . . $459,882.00 14. G. Vella Construction Company San Dimas $471,943.00 15. Mike Prlich & Sons South El Monte $478,690.00 i6. McGuire Construction, Inc. Placentia $482,574.40 17. Bebek Company Irvine $512,865.00 18. 19. 20. 21. ,, 22. 23. 24. 25. AGENDA ITEM #lO(bb) CG-2 DISTRICT ·7 RESOLUTION NO. 75-76-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF DIRECTOR'S DEED A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF DIRECTOR'S DEED (QUITCLAIM) FROM STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, RE CONTRACT NO. 7-1 * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Director's Deed (Quitclaim) dated , wherein the State of California, Department of Transportation, grants to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent grant deed of certain excess properties adjacent to the San Diego Freeway and abutting the District's easement for the Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-1, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the real property conveyed by said Director's Deed (Quitclaim) is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said Director's Deed (Quitclaim) is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to record said Director's Deed in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 14, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #lO(cc) -DD-DISTRICT 7 RESOLUTION NO. 75-77-7 APPROVING TEMPORARY RENTAL AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RE CONTRACT NO. 7-6-6 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF TEMPORARY RENTAL AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY FOR RIGHT OF WAY RE ·TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, REACH 10, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-6 * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain temporary rental agreement dated ------------~ , wherein Southern Pacific Railroad Company grants to County Sanitation District No. 7 the ·right to construct the Tustin- Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 10, Contract No. 7-6-6, through Southern Pacific Railroad Company right of way in the vicinity from Laguna Road to Irvine Boulevard, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment in the amount of $500.00 per month per acre, for a total amount not to exceed $8,800.00, is hereby authorized; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said a~reement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 14, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #lO(dd) -EE-DISTRICT 7 1 May 1975 Board of Directors County Sanitation Dist. #7 . 16844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, Calif • . Gentlemen: This is a request to annex our property to OCSD #7. The assessed va 1 ue of our property is $ _3;. ::;J 6 c.., . There are no registered voters in the annexation. /}:/?if So 3 111-0 I AGENDA ITEM #lO(ff) -FF-DISTRICT 7 TO: FROM: MEMORANDUM May 8, 1975 Fred A. Harper, General Manager Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer Cou.NTY SANITATION D1sTR1crs of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 IOS.C-4 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLE'(, CALIFOR~ 92708 (71-4) 5-40-2910 (71'4) 962-2-411 SUBJECT: Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 10, Contract No. 7-6-6 Installation of pipe, backfill, and base ·paving has been completed on Mitchell Avenue up to Station 22+00 (Debusk Lane). Poor ground conditions have slowed progress. Approximately 400' of Mitchell Avenue is closed to through traffic from Del Amo Avenue to Raleigh Place. Installation of pipe on Newport Avenue from First Street to Irvine Boulevard is complete. The siphon under the Orange County Flood Control box on Newport Avenue is complete. The Contractor estimates installing 100' of VCP per day. A temporary chain link fence is installed around the excavation during all non-working hours. ,, REL : BEW: TR: s s AGENDA ITEM #lO(gg) GG-1 DISTRICT 7 Q Q I l'\J RED HH .. L.. !):> ! <' I ril ~z ·c :Pl AVENUE -------Con?j'!ele ••o9oe 7o iJe conslr~c.led (b :t> < )> z Tusfin -Ordnge TYunk Sewer- Reach 10 Con -lrt:1cl-A/~, 7-~-~ /, ~ ,,.,_;f~g or 27'f:'1?~ Cos!: 8 57~575~ !JCJle ol" a;;~:u-d t.ltM. 8 1 '75 5ched(//ed' c;,l'Y!f'/eh~n ~t1ly '75 Conlr.::1clor,' //!£Gv11--~ ( RESOLUTION NO. 75-79-il AMENDING RESOLUTION NO~ 74-97-11 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH STATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE BOLSA CHICA STATE. BEACH, TO AUTHORIZE CHANGE OF SAID AGREEMENT DATE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 74-97-11 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH STATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION FOR DISPOSAL OF SEWAGE ORIGINATING WITHIN THE BOLSA CHICA STATE BEACH AND PROVIDING FOR PAYMENT THEREOF, APPROVING CHANGE OF SAID AGREEMENT DATE * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: That, pursuant to the request of the State Department of Parks and Recreation, Section 1 of Resolution No. 74-97-11 is hereby amended to read as follows: "That the certain agreement, dated March 15, 1974, between County Sanitation District No. 11 and the State of California, acting through the Department of Parks and Recreation, for disposal of sewage originating within the Balsa Chica State Beach, and providing for payment of capacity rights and annual maintenance and operating costs, is hereby approved and accepted .. " PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 14, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #lO(hh) HH-1 DISTRICT 11 STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATIOi~ P.O. BOX 2390 SACRAMENTO 95811 Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester Secretary of the Board of Directors County Sanitation Dis~ricts of Orange County P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. Sylvester: EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Gonrnor May 5, 1975 Reference is made to the proposed sewer agreement between the County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County and the State of California relative to Balsa Chica State Beach. The subject agreement, executed by District, was returned to me by transmittal letter dated March 27, 1975 and therefore this date was entered as the date of the agreement. We have now learned that by the entry of this date onto the agreement, state law prevents the payment of the $60,480 buy-in charge unless the agreement is back dated to March 15, 1974 when we first agreed to the said charge. We therefore request that the District agree that the sewer agree- ment be made and entered into this 15th day of March, 1974. If this is acceptable to the Board of Directors, will you please prepare sheet one of the sewer a_greement over again and send me six copies of it together with six certified true copies of a resolution by the Board of Directors of District No. 11 approving this agreement. Should you have any questions, please call me at (916) 445-4330. Sincerely, n1. i,1: . //£-L / {:!i~~~~;nv/l /·. . ,yhzci.· William M. Kuromot _,,,· Land Agent P-1/247 AGENDA ITEM #lO(hh) HH-2 DISTRICT 11 .. .. , ., . ( . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. O. BOX 8127, f"OUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELL.IS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) I NOTICE OF RECISSION TO: Jeanne L. Eddows dba Alart Company· P. o. Box 6263 ~uena Park, California 90622 TCLCPHONCB: AREA CODC 71'4 540-2910 962·2411 May 6, 1975 ~~ease take notice that County Sanitation District. No. 1 of Orange County, California, hereby elects to rescind the agreement made by us entitled AGREEMENT FOR SALE OF DIGESTED SEWAGE SOLIDS, dated February 20, 1975 on.the following grounds: · ·l. Mistake -Said mistake being that of your ability to provide the labor, materials, and equipment to remove the solid wastes in the manner contemplated by the agreement to prevent the i-. d . t . f b1 . . creavion an maJ.n enc.nee 0 a pu ~ic nuisance. 2. Fraud -Consisting of your representation as to your capabilities to provide labor, materials, and equipment necessary and required to remove the sludge as it became available and prior to the· creation of a public nuisance and health hazard by reason of your failure to cause said sludge to be removed. · 3. Failure of co~sideration as follows: (a) Failure to remove sewage solids from Plant No. 1 in your trucks or equipment ,, (b) Failure to remove the sludge from open-air drying beds at Plant No. 2 {c) The creation of a public nuisance by reason of odors and health hazard (d) '. Your loss of capability to perform by reason of altered financial circumstances the substance of which was a material representation inducing the undersigned to execu~e the subject contract. AGENDA ITEM #13(b) II-1 ALL DISTRICTS ... . . -( May 6, 1975 J·eanne L. Eddows dba Alart Company Page 2 ,-· COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS_ ,. of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 108.C.C ELLIS AVrNUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORN1~92708 (714') 5.C0-2910 ..,; (714') 962-2411 • Effective, Tuesday, May 6, 1975, you and your agents and equipment will be barred from the premises of the undersigned and .. the undersigned will undertake to abate the existing nuisance· and make other arrangements ·for disposal ozsl dge and solid wastes. C ,' /'" /Jf· ./t0L_ 'kite~/ (_ J ~ 'Wajrne / Sy'lves er JWS:CAN:gg Receipt of the original copy of this letter is hereby.accepted and 8:cknowledged: AGENDA ITEM #13(b) / ~ec;r~tar:>;_pf County Sanitation (/ Di&Srict~o. 1 of Orange County ,, . I• II-2 ALL DISTRICTS cou:rrY S:\:l JT,\ TIO:~ IH ;,TI~ I crs 01: O!~\::(;E cou;:TY }> • 0 • Box 8 l 2 7 - l O '' H E 11 i s • \ v c-nu c Fountain Valley, California ~2708 c. o. :m. u ·. -~ .... CllA:~GE OIWER A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & ~o;nHACTOR: N. M. Saliba Company. A Joint Venture DATE ~M-a-y--14-,--1-9-.7-5--------~ )-" JOB: Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (J}'Um'nXX) $96,066. 79 In accordance with contract provisions, the following chan~cs in the contract and/or contract work arc hereby authori:cJ and as co::ipcnsation therefor, t!1e following additions to or deductions from the contract price arc hereby approved. References: Contractor's letters dated: January 3, · 1974; March 3, 1975; SupeTior Court ADD: Case No. 201647 dated May 22, 1973; Sections 104 & 105-1 of Detailed Speci- ficiations; City of Westminster letters dated ~overnber 11, 1973 and April 16, 1974. 1. The District was directed under Superior Court Case No. 201647 to improve Main Street . to its ultimate width which required an addition .of 30,498 sq. ft. of 3" A.C. over 6" of aggregate base at a unit rate of $1.04 sq. ft. for a total sum of 2. District under the provisions of Superior Court Case No. 201647 was required to improve the entire width of Main Street to 3" of asphalt on 6" of aggregate base. Included in this item was 37,114 sq. ft. of asphal tic overlays varying from 1/2" to 1" in depth for a unit price of 21~/sq. ft. for a total of 3. To provide the ultimate pavement thickness as provided in the Superior Court Case No. 201647, Contractor was required to place an additional 1/2" of asphal tic concrete over the trench area in the amount of 237 tons per unit price of $8.851/ton for a total of 4. Under the provisions of Superior Court Case No. 201647, the District was directed to restore the private development in the public right-of-way to their existing conditions as near as possible. The District directed the Contractor to relocate interferring utilities and excavations as required in the restoration of private inprovements as necessary for a mutually agreed lump sum price of S. At the request of the City of Westminster concrete curb and gutter was placed to comply with the final design grades as established by the City for a.total lump sum amount mutually agreed upon and charged to the City of Westminster for the total sum of AGENDA ITEM #27 JJ-1 ·. $31,7i7.92 7, 793.94 2,097.68 27,740.00 12,788.05 DISTRICT· 3 COUHTY SJ\:UTATIO?~ DISTIUCTS OF ORANGE COU?JTY P. O. Box 8127 -108·14 Ellis J\vcnuc Fountain Valley, California 927 08 CHANGE Olll>ER A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. c.o. rm. 11 CONTMCTOn: & N. M. Saliba Company, A Joi i~~ _':'.::~!t_ir_e __ DATE --~Ma-y-""!1~4-,-.~19~7~5=-------- 4 ., JOB: ___________ K_n_o_t_t_I_n_t_c_r_~_e~p-to_r_, __ R_e_a_ch __ 4_, __ c_o_n_t_r_ac_t_'_N_o_. __ 3_-_1s ______________________________ __ 6. The District was required to secure the right-of-way for the Contractor to .install the Knott Interceptor on Hoover Street between Hazard Street and Main Street. As a condition of the right-of-way and the restoration of the existing iir.provements which were· not included in the original contract documents, the District ordered the Contra~tor to restore those improvements affected by the installation of the Knott Interceptor to the City standard which include 10,657 sq. ft. of 4" asphaltic cQncrcte over 8" of aggregate base and ·13, 552 sq. ft. of asphal tic overlays for a total amount of . Extension of Contract Time , · The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of time for this change order of TOTAL ADD TOTAL TIME EXTENSION . Summary of Contract.Time Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this Change Order Previous Time Extension Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes 13,929.20 $96,066.79 180 Calendar Days 180 Calend3r navs June 1, 1973 360 Calendar Days May 27, ~974 180 Calendar Days 199 Calendar Days 379 Calendar Days 739 Calendar Days JWte 10, 1975 $ 4,334,412.00 ---- $ 49,537.27 --~~~--------- This Change (ADD) (;rnXN~) $ ~--~--~~---~ 96,066. 79 Board authorization date: May 14, 1975 By ______________ ::-.--~----~~---~~ Consulting Engineer ~y------~------~~~----~~-----C on tractor AGENDA ITEM #27 Aracn<lcd Contract Price s 4 ,480 ,016. 06 JJ-2 Approved: COU!\TY SAN ITAT IO!~ DISTRICTS of Orange County, California . By ------~~~~----~---c-h_1_c~r--~1-~1-1r.-.~1-:1_c_c_r DISTRICT 3 '· S T A F F REPORT May 8, 1975 SUBJECT: Change Order No. 11 to Contract No. 3-18 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108..C..C ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLE"'., CALIFORNrft 92708 (71..C) 5..C0-2910 (714) 962-2.Cl l During the Spring of 1973, there was much discussion between the District and the City of Westminster regarding the alignment of the 96-inch Knott Interceptor through the City. The City was not in agreement with the route selected by the Board and the District was required to file a lawsuit for the issuance of an excavation permit to allow the contract to proceed along the alignment established by the Board. The lawsuit was handed down in favor of the Di~trict in a decision dated May 22, 1973, which was subsequent to the award of the contract made on April 11, 1973. In addition to the contract requirements regarding excavation, · trench width, placing of excavations and traffic control, there was a special condition in the judgment which stipulated that the District shall improve Main Street between Hoover Street and Goldenwest Avenue (approximately 1/2 mile), to the ultimate width as established by the City, and place three inches of asphaltic concrete on six inches of aggregate base and that all existing private improvements within the public right-of-way shall be restored as nearly as possible to their original condition. The contractor was required to perform this work in addition to the regular contractual obligations on a force account basis. This work on Main Street required by the court order was performed at a cost of $69,609.54. Included in this change order is the sum of $12,788.05 for curb and gutter and driveway aprons requested by the City of Westminster which will be paid by the City. Also included in this change order is the sum of $13,929.20 for street improvements on Hoover Street which was not included in the original contract documents. There were existing private improvements which had not been dedicated to the City and in previous discussions with the City prior to the award of the contract, the City felt that the private property owner would request development which would- necessi tate full improvements and dedi.cation to the City for public right-of-way in Hoover Street. This was not accomplished prior to the time that the award was made on this contract and the private street improvements that were then existing were in the trench prism for the installation of the 96-inch pipe and had to be replaced to City standards. This work was performed on a force account basis. This particular trunk line sewer construction is probably one of the most difficult that any of the Districts have undertaken to date. This sewer is constructed along an alignment to intercept the local sewers which will best serve the drainage area, but traverses some of the poorest subsurface soil conditions to be encountered. In conjunction with these poor soil conditions, the sewer traverses t~rough public right-of-way which has been greatly encumbered b)' other underground utilities both known and presently in use, and those that.have been abandoned and where records are very limited or.inaccurate. This particular contract has also been subjected to a three-month labor strike which occurred in the summer of 1974 which affected most of the direct labor trades, as well as the trades associated with the support efforts such as pipe production, asphalt and gravel. The work has sustained AGENDA ITEM #27 KK-1 DISTRICT· 3 STAFF REPORT Change Order No. 11 to Contract No. 3-18 May 8, 1975 Page Two substantial delays associated with the failure of the Southern California Edison Company to relocate the power poles on Main Street in order that the sewer could be constructed without interruption to the overhead power and telephone facilities. The contractor was also requested to·suspend any construction on Westminster Avenue, during a period of time in which he was allowed to operate under the contract, to accommodate the Founder's Day Festivities of the City. A summary of the change orders on this project issued to date are as follows: CO# Description or Items Listed Included in Change Order 5 6 7 1 Construction method -allow reversal of pipe laying sequence 2 3 Time extension due to weather Time extension due to labor strike 4 Change in construction methods a. Eliminate tunnel at railroad crossing b. Use tunnel pipe with encasement in trench condition c. Change in siphon size Time extension due to labor strike Removal of debris, abandoned So. Ca. Gas concrete vault, construction of brick bulk- head, and removal and recon- struction of portion of curve & curb, gutter and cross gutter Time extension -delays due to City's celebration 8 Excessive pavement depths, undelineated 8" VCP storm drain and abandoned gas main AGENDA ITEM #27 KK-2 Amount 0.00 o.oo o.oo ·o. oo 0.00 7,928.77 o.oo 12,854.50 Time Extensions 0 89 39 0 31· 15 10 0 Remarks Principal cost associated with undisclosed con- crete structures & connection with Contract 3-17 and 3-17-1 Storm drain intr - f erence & exces~e pavement depth & gas main interfer. DISTRICT. 3 STAFF RE PORT Change Order No. 11 to Contract No. 3-18 May 8, 1975 .._.,. Page Three Description or Items Listed CO# Included in Change Order Amount .9 Removal and disposal of abandoned gas lines and additional excavation, back- fill & recompaction $ 28,754.00 TOTALS TO DATE 10 Incorporate federal regulations 11 Main Street Improvements a. Paveouts 3"AC/6"AB b. AC overlays c. Street excavation restore private developments d. Curb, gutter and driveways e. Hoover Street Improvements TOTAL CO#ll GRAND TOTAL $49,537.27 0.00 31,717.92 9,891.62 27,740.00 12,788.05 13,929.20 $ 96,066.79 $145,604.06 .. :·, · .. Time Extensions Remarks Chargeable to So •. 15 Calif. Gas Co. 199 0 180 379 Req. by SCC201647 Req. by SCC~Ol647 Req. by SCC201647 To be paid by City of Westminster Restore of R/W improv- ments not included in contract R E C A P 0 F C H A N G E -0 R D E R S TOTAL CO 1 to 11 a. City's responsibility b. Chargeable to utilities NET TO DISTRICT Required by SCC 201647 Required for R/W (Hoover St) MISC. EXTRA WORK ,, $145,604.06 12,788.05 28,754.00 $104,062.01* 69,349.54 13,929.20 $ 20,783.27 *Eligible for Federal Grant Participation of 4.29% = $4,464.26 AGENDA ITEM #27 DISTRICT 3 STAFF REPORT Change Order No. 11 to Contract No. 3-18 May 8, 1975 Page Four As previously stated, the amount of $12,788.05 is the obligation of the City of Westminster for curb and gutter improvements on Main Street. Southern California Gas Company ~as been invoiced in the amount of $28,754. for the work associated with their facilities encountered on Bolsa Avenue between Newland Avenue and Hoover Street. It should also be pointed out at this time that the contractor has filed a claim in the amount of $17,460.14 for extra work associated with the City of Westminster's water lines. This matter is being referred to the City of Westminster for their disposition. A recent change in the Government Code (Section 4215) provides that the "public agency shall be responsible to compensate the contractor, or cause to have done, the cost of relocating, repairing damage not due to the failure of the contractor to exercise reasonable care in the removing or relocating of such interfering utilities and that the contractor shall not be assessed any liquidated damages for del?YS in the completion of the project". This statuate also states that nothing shall preclude the public agency from pursuing any appropriate remedy for delays or costs which are the responsibility of the util~ty. A copy of an opinion from Mr. Nissan is enclosed with this report. It is recommended that this change order be approved and the time extension of· 180 .calendar days be allowed. ,, AGENDA ITEM #27 KK-4 ·DISTRICT.3 ~ AGENDA ITEM 1/.27 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 l 2 13 14 15 16 17 ia· 19 20 21 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFO~NIA FOR TUE COUNTY OF ORANGE COUNTY S~NITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORUIA, Petitioner, vs CITY OF WESTMINSTER, CALIFORNIA: ) ) ) No. 201G47 PHILIP L. ANTHONY, M1tyor and PREEMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE City Council~an; FRi\NCIS s. FRY, JR., Mayor Pro Tern and City Councilman, BUEL G. JARRITT, City Councilman7 DEREK C. HcWHINl~EY, City Councilman; JOY L. NEUGEBAUER, City c6uncilwoman, ). Respondents. TO:. .TUE CITY OF WESTMINSTER, CALIFORNIA, PHILIP L. ANTHONY, FRANCIS S. FRY, JR., BUEL G. JARRITT, DEREK C. McW!IINNEY, JOY L. NEUGEBAUER: · After hearing and determination by this Court ·that you have £ailed to perform your legal duty and abused your dis- cretion in failing to approve an.excavation permit for petitioner to excavate, construct, use and maintain a 96-inch sewcrline in the City of Westminster~ California in the following streets: orth on Hoover Street fi:om Bolsa Avenue to Main Street, west n Main Street to Goldenwest Street and north on Goldenwest treet to Westminster Avenue, upon the following terms and onditions: LIMIT OF EXCAVATION. Except by expressed written permission of the Distn.ct, the maximum length of open trench shall be 600 feet, or the distance necessary to accommodate the amount of pipe installed on a single day, whichever is the nro::a+-o~ IJlh.o ~,: .... .,_ ____ '-~'--__ ,.~ • • ... SPECIAL CONDITION. The District shall restore the exist- ing pavement to the ultimate width of Main Street as estab- lished by the City of Westminster within the .right-of-way presently owned by the City of Westminster with 3-inches of aaphaltic concrete on 6-inchcs of ~ggrcgate base. All existing private improvements shall be restored as near asJ possible to their original condition. BRACING EXCAVATIONS. All excavations shall be p"ropcrly supported J.n the manner prescribed by the rules, orders, and regulations of the Division of Industrial Safety of the State of California. Excavations shall be so braced, sheeted and supported that they will be safe, and the ground along side the excavation will not slide or settle, and all cxinting improvements of any kind, either on public or privote prorcrty, will be fully protected from damage. If any dilmage does result to such Improvements, the Contractor, <.lt his own,cxpr>nse, ohu.11 make the necessary • . repairs or reconstruction_ required as dlrectcd by the DISTR .CT 3 District. KK-i.1. " STAF·F REPORT May 8, 1975 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 . 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-24 I I SUBJECT: Step I Grant Program -Evaluation of Activated Carbon Treatment System (Jet Propulsion Laboratory Process) The Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of Districts' staff and personnel from Jet Propulsion Laboratory and John Carollo Engineers have been actively engaged in the past several days in testing of the carbon sludge dewatered cake in Springfield, Ohio and in Belle Mead, New Jersey, in a multiple-hearth furnace. The test in Springfield, Ohio was conducted during the week of April 28th and the test in Belle Mead, New Jersey was conducted during a period from May 5th to May 8th in- clusive. The test results are being evaluated at this time and the conclusions have.yet to. be written, but it initially appears that the material can be pyrolyzed and activated readily in both the rotary kiln as well as the multlple·lIBarth furnace with yields in excess of 110 percent with activations approaching that of commercial activated carbon. There are two principle concerns at this time; that of the energy requirement and the ash contents contained in the sewage. Both aspects have been openly discussed by the members of the Technical Advisory Committee and it is felt that only through the operation of the 1-MGD pilot plant can these b.e definitively determined. A true materials balance on a continuous operation can only be ascertained through the operation of the 1-MGD plant. It has not been truly determined at this time the amount of carbon that is required for extraction of the ash content contained within the sewag€ but this will be determined in the operation of the pilot unit. The staff has also been working on the procurement of the necessary components for the 1-MGD pilot facility and the cost estimates and quotations have been received for site preparation, support utilities, solids dewatering equipment, pyrolysis reactors and the hydraulic units such as·clarifiers, pumps, etc. Preliminary review of the costs indicate that the unit can be installed and made operational by December 1, 1975 at a cost of approximately $1.3 to $1.S million. The grant application was filed in May, 1974 at an estimated construction cost of $1. 6 million. The tests which were conducted at Springfield, Ohio and Belle Mead, New Jersey have attracted interest by other agencies, parti.cularly the Environmental Protection Agency. Members from the Environmental Protection Agency's staff from Cincinnati and Washington, D.C., visited the Springfield and Belle Mead test facilities. A meeting to exchange technical information between the Technical Advisory Committee and members of the Environm0ntal Protection Agency is scheduled for Friday, May 9th in the Districts' offices, on similar work sponsored by EPA. STAFF REPORT Step I Grant Program May 8, 1975 Page Two A meeting is scheduled for Monday, May 12th with members of the Technical Committee to decide on the facilities to be recommended to the State and Environmental Protection Agency for the construction of the pilot unit. Based upon the con- clusions at this meeting, a report will be submitted to the State and EPA on Tuesday, May 13th, in order that they may have sufficient time to review the recommendations before a meeting to be held at the Districts' offices on May 20th. This meeting on May 20th has been delayed one week in order to afford the staff of the State and Environmental Protection Agency sufficient time to review the recommendations in order that a firm commitment can be made at the 20th meeting. It is hoped that orders and contracts can be committed on June 1, 1975 to meet the December 1st deadline for operation of the pilot unit. Attached herewith is a letter from Mr. Pat Rygh of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory's staff, setting forth some of the concerns, as well as the agenda for the technical exchange conference to be held on May 9th. REL:hje .• JET PROPULSION LABORATORY California Institute of Technology • 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California 9110) Mr. Ray Lewis Chief Engineer County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Calif. 92708 Dear Ray: April 30, · 197 5 In the conversation I had with you and Harvey Hunt in your off ice on 29 April, I came away with the impression that there are some mis- conceptions about the ACTS process. Although all the data have been avail~ble, we may not have been connnunicating the ramifications of the data as well as I had thought. I am enclosing a compilation of all the data on the process to date, so that we are all on the same data base. I am also including another set of the plots which we discussed. The specific that I would like to point out from the plots is that the ACTS process is not energy self-sufficient. The extent to which energy must be added is strongly driven by carbon yield and de- watering efficiency. Some handle on these should be available by 14 May from the Nichols Press test and the two pyrolysis tests. The significant technical problem remaining with the process re- sults from our unexpected trouble with separating the ash from the car- bon. In figure A-15 of the original grant application, also attached, we show a blow-off of about 19% of the recirculating ash resulting in the 50% ash, 50% carbon material balance. Since we have not as yet achieved any significant classification of the carbon/ash mixture, the ash can only be removed by also removing the carbon fraction with it. The higher the carbon yield, the more that can be discharged, keeping the recirculating 'ash percentage down. The yields that were obtained at the Versa Tech test, and which are being repeated at Combustion Engineering, put us in the 60 to 65 percent steady-state ash range. As you can see on the plots, this puts us into the knee of the curve, and close to the 50% value originally expected. As can be noted in the data, the pure ACTS process does not meet all of the standards all of the time. We feel that some auxiliary Tt.'lt•plw11e 35·1-412 I Tt-lex 675421 Twx 910-588-3:!9.J JET PHOPllLSION l.ABOHATOHY <:alifon,ia ll/.\t'it11te of Trc/1110/ogy • ·ISOO On/, Gmvc Drhw, l'u.H11fr11a, <:alif11rnin 'JI UH -2- chemical treatment may be preferable to massive dosages of carbon. We are exploring these auxiliary treatments at this time. One of the options which we are not considering is the purchase of additional activated carbon. We feel that the ec9nomics of buying carbon would make the system non-competitive. Both the energy and the ash problem reflect in a decrease in the economy of the process. The process is still valid. However, these eco- nomics must be a strong input into your decision on whether or not to use this process. The pilot plant will, ~opefully, definitize these economics. Sincerely, PJR/bm Attachments .. ' r AG END/\ .\ .· Meeting to Exchanuc Tcchnic11l Itlfori:;ol.icn · Sludge Pyrolysis and Curbon Activation Project Orange County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenu0 Fontain Valley, California 92708 (714-540-2910) 9: 00 -9: 10 9:10 -9:15 9: 15 -11 : 00 11:00 -11:30 11:30 -12:00' 12:00 - l :00 l: 00 -3: 00 ·3: Ob -4: 00 4:00 -4:30 ,. March 13, · 197 5 Introduction Orange County Purpose of the meeting EPA Update on ~dctitio~al work and test results Orange Cou1~ty I JPL 1. Orange County 2. JPL 3. Louisville tests 4. Other Pyrolysis Carbon Activation No-host lunch (lcok at pilot plant on way to lunch) EPA EPA System performance arJd treatment EPA efficiency: GOD, COD, SS, supplementary treatment, recirculating build~~s, inerts, carbon balance Energy and cost-effectiveness EPA Summation and comments EPA Orange County/JPL Joint Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California May 5, 1975 AGENDA ITEM NO.J.1_ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 Subject: Summary Finandal Report for Nine-Months Ended March 31, 1975 Transmitted herewith is the regular quarterly summary financial report for the nine months ended March 31, 1975, pursuant to the Boards' policy directive of June 14, 1972. The statements summarize the fiscal activities of the joint operations and the individual Districts for the first three quarters of the 1974-75 fiscal year and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The combined 1974-75 budgets for al 1 Districts is approximately $90 million, of which 85% is for capital expenditures for facll I ties improvements and additions. The average percents of budgeted revenue and expense categories of the several Districts are as fol lo.vs: Budgeted Revenue Tax Revenue Federal & State Construction Grant5 Connection Fees Other Revenues Carry-over from Accumulated Construction Reserves Average Percent of Tota 1 Budget 19% 22 2 6 Budgeted Expenditures District Facilities Expansion and Reserves Joint Works Expansions and Reserves Debt Service Share of Joint Operations District Operations, Maintenance, and Other Average Percent of Total Budget 41 4 5 6 Included in each District's statement is a summary of the above major income and expense categories and an Itemization of their trunk sewer construction projects and respective share of the joint works expansion. Separate staff reports on individual construction probjects are inciuded each month with the agenda material for the Joint Board meeting. The EDP system is in the process of implementation and has produced much of the data incorporated into this report. Presently, general ledger, accounts payable, fixed assets, and payroll are installed. The cost and inventory control systems are· under design. Expenditures of all 34 funds of the several Districts wi 11 be maintained well within their respective 1974-75 total budget allocations. However, because of developments which could not be anticipated when budgets were approved, and the higher than expected impact of inflationary trends, it appears as if budget transfers for expansion in certain categories wil 1 be necessary. These transfers represent one-tenth of one percent adjustment of the total budget, and less than 1% of the operating budget. The budget transfers which are more fully described in this report, and summarized on the last page, are recommended. Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. The statements are presented on an accrual basis and, therefore, inter-district transactions for fiscal '74-75 which were accrued in 1973-74 are not reflected in the year-to-date balances. Operating and bond contingencies and reserves are' not reflected in the budgetary· columns. If you have any questions concerning this material, I would be pleased to discuss them with you at your convenience. CASH AND INVESTMENTS Earned interest of approximately $3,286,000 from our contfnuing program of investing reserve funds (primarily capital funds accumulated for construction of required sewerage facilities) has accrued during the first nine months of fiscal 1974-75. This is almost half again the interest earnings for the same period last year, primarily because of increased construction funds accumulated, and a substantial increase in interest rates on maturing issues over the past year; and will represent an equivalent reduction on the average District's tax rate of approximately 10¢ annually. Interest rates have decreased from a high of 10.9% during the first quarter to a current yield of 6.5-7.5%. As of December 31st, 96% of the Districts' cash funds were invested in short-term government securities or time deposits as shown belo.-J. The balance of cash on hand was earning interest in commingled investments with the County Treasurer's Office. Amount Percent Cash on Hand $ 1 ,865,506 4% Investments in Gov 1 t Securities 43, 198,917 _2.§!__ Total (Al 1 Districts) $45,064,423 ~ JOINT OPERATING FUND This fund accounts for operation, maintenance, and administrative activities relative to the Districts• jointly- owned treatment and disposal facilities. Salaries and Wages -Pursuant to last year's Board approval of a two-year pact with employees, salary adjustments for Districts• employees became effective December 1st. Increases which were established by the agreement provided for a fixed amount plus an increase based on the cost of 1 iving change. Needless to say, the cost of 1 iving index jumped considerably during the stipulated period, and the added salary cost projected for 1974-75 is approximately $152,250. However, because of presently unfilled positions, it is anticipated that the increases wil 1 be funded from the current year payroll savings and expenses will be maintained well within the budget allocation. Employees• Benefits -Includes Retirement, Workmen's Compensation, Group Medical Insurance, and Uniforms all of which \'Jill be within the budgetary level. Gasoline 2 Oi 1, and Fuel -As the Directors are aware, significant cost increases in petroleum products have been experienced. The Districts' cooperative purchasing arrangement for gasoline and diesel fuel with the County of Orange has been superseded by Federal petroleum allocation and price regulations. Under the regulations, sanitation services receive priority allocations. The recently-completed contract to increase our gasoline storage capacity now allows us to receive full tank-trunk deliveries. The budget allocation should suffice even if prices are further increased. Insurance -Annual premiums are expensed at time of payment which is generally during the first quarter. Amount reflects the net expense after chargebacks to individual Districts for their respective share of the insurance overhead related to job costing. As reported in the budget message, and prior quarterly reports, premiums have increased substantially. The Joint Chairman has requested an agenda item approving all risk coverage for District employees and Directors while on District business out of Orange County. · Therefore, a transfer of $1000 from the Chemical Coagulants budget is requested for this account. The staff wil 1 recommend funds be included in the 1975-76 budget to study the Districts' insurance requirements. Chlorine and Odor Control Chemicals -Primarily for odor control at treatment plant sites. The limited supply of chlorine available was reflected in bids received in December. The unit price has increased 55%, and, accordingly, a budget transfer of $40,000 for this item from the Chemical Coagulants account wil 1 be necessary as previously reported to the Boards. Chemical Coagulants -The staff has been able to temporarily change the mode of operation which has precluded the necessity of expending funds and yet enable the Districts to meet the current enforced discharge regulations. However, the Boards approved an award of $65,000 for polyelectrolyte chemicals at the February meeting to enable the Districts to meet the NPDES requirements. Because of the surplus in this account, it is recommended that other budget transfers be made from this appropriation. Contractual Services -Expenditures to date are primarily for sludge hauling. Professional Services -Includes cost of General Counsel 1 s fees and cost of recent EDP and purchasing studies and audit services. Rents and Leases -Equipment -Primarily for the rental of large equipment necessary for removing and replacing sewage treatment equipment, and other necessary work during the course ·of maintenance and repair operations. -2- Repairs and Maintenance -Parts and supplies for rep~ir of plant facilities. Many of the parts and supplies necessary for plant equipment are increasing in cost over 100%. As stated in the Febryary 13th~ transmittal it, therefore, will be necessary to allocate additional funds for this account from the Chemical Coagulants budget in the amount of $50,000. Research and Monitoring -Annual share of participation in Southern California Coastal Waster Research Project has been paid, and expense to date includes estimated allocations for the first three quarters of 1974-75. Utilities -The major item in the Util I ties Expense Account is for purchased electrical power, which has increased substan~lally ($105,000 over last year) due to the increase of petroleum cost to the electrical utilities. A portion is from rising demand as flows increase and new facilities are placed i~to service. Other Expenses -For items not chargeable elsewhere. Major item in .this account is freight-in which, again, because of increasing fuel costs has exceeded anticipations. A budget transfer of $1,000 from the Chemical Coagulants account is, therefore, recommended. Prior Year's Expense -This account represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account balance from the previous year. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND This fund accounts for the costs of expanding and improving the Districts' jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities and represents an average of 44% of each individual District 1 s budget requirements for 1974-75. During the first six months, $12.5 million was expended on joint works treatment and disposal facilities expansion, primarily on the $29.6 million 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 1, approximately 84% of which will be grant funded. INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS -The statements reflect the accounting transactions for the seven Districts and include each respective District's share of the Joint Operating Fund and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. Taxes -Approximately 55% of 1974-75 property taxes had been apportioned through March 31st. A 30% allocation was made on April 17th. Federal and State Construction Grants -Construct~on Grant funds received during the period amount to $4,951 ,219, all but $284,318 of which is on the 46 MGD Activated Slud9e project. Presently, State and Federal agencies will fund 87-1/2% of 11 approved 11 treatment projects. Grant receipts are running behind budget expectations, however, related capital outlays are also less than projected. Fees -Districts 5 and 7 have had connection charges for several years. Connection fee collections Tnlfistrict 5 have dropped off considerably (15% of the budget for the first nine months) during the past several months, and it appears as if collections will not be as high as anticipated. Because of this, a re-evaluation of District 5 1 s construction program is underway. District 7 receipts are. running about 51% of the· budget projections. Connection fees became effective in Districts Nos. 2 and 3 on October 1, 1973. The collections for these two Districts amounted to approximately $945,000 for each during the first fiscal year. This represented approximately 72% of the annual fees anticipated In the consultant's projections for District No. 2, and 39% for District No. 3. Budgets for Districts 2 and 3 were reduced in 1974-75, and it appears as if collections are presently running slightly above budget projections. Statements reflect reclassification of other fees to this category which were previously included in other revenue. · Other Revenue -Except as footnoted, consists pri.marily of interest income and sale of capacity rights. (See comment above under 11 Fees.11 ) District Construction -Represents expenditures on Districts' Master Plan construction program of trunk sewers. The average 1974-75 budget for this item is 41% for the seven Districts. However, this average is influenced by the major programs of Districts 2 and 3. Itemization of each project is included on the lower portion of each financial statement. The total expenditure for the seven Districts during the first three quarters was $7,792, 130. Share of Joint Works Construction -Represents Districts' share of joint treatment and disposal facilities expansion. Discussed above under Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. Bond Retirement and Interest Expense -Payment of principal and interest on outstanding general obligation bonds of the respective Districts. Annual expense for all Districts is approximately $2.3 mi 11 ion. Share of Joint Operating -Represents Districts' share of operating and maintaining jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities, and administrative activities. Costs are distributed based upon each District's respective gallonage flow. (See Joint Operating Fund statement for details.) -3- ' . _.Ill Dlstrlct Operating and Other Expenditures -Consists primarily of Individual Districts' general operating expenses and operation, maintenance, and repair of the respective Districts' collection systems. Districts 1 and 2 have experienced increased monitoring requirements for certain industries and It ls~ therefore, necessary to request a transfer of $3,000 respectively from the Unappropriated Reserve account to the Connection Adminstration account. Because of continually rising electrical power costs, Districts 5, 6, 7, and 11, which have the majority of the outlying pumping station facilities, will require transfer of $6,000, $400, $2,000 and $3,000 respectively from their Unappropriated Reserve accounts to their Utilities Accounts. District 5 will also require a transfer of $10,000 from the Manhole Repairs account to complete currently budgeted contracts. District 7 should transfer $200 to their Memberships account to cover increased proportional share of AMSA and CASA dues. District 11 1 s increased flows through the District 3 system will require a transfer of $4,000. Publication of the proposed use ordinances may also require budget transfers. JOINT OPERATING FUND From the Account Chemical Coagulants To the Account Insurance Chlorine & Odor Control Chemicals Repairs and Mtce. Parts Other Expenses Amount $92 1 000 $ 1,000 40,000 50,000 11000 $92 1 000 DISTRICT OPERATING FUNDS District No. 2. 5 6 7 11 From the Account Unappropriated Reserve Unappropriated Reserve Unappropriated Reserve Unappropriated Reserve Unappropriated Reserve Unappropriated Reserve J. Wayne Sylvester Director of Finance -4- To the Account ~ Connection Administration $ 3 1 000 Connection Administration.$ 3,000 Utilities Manhole Repairs Ut i 1 it i es Utilities Memberships Utilities Inter-District Sewer Use $16,000 $ 6,000 10,000 $16 1 000 $ 400 $ 2,200 $ 2,000 200 $ 2,200 $ 7!000 $ 3,000 4 2000 $ 7 2000 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SUMMARY JOINT OPERATING BUDGET REVIEW NINE MONTHS ENDED 3-31-75 BUDGET REMAINING YEAR TO DATE BUDGET SALARIES, WAGES & BENEFITS Salaries & Wages Employee Benefits Sub-total Payroll. Les.s: Chargebacks to Dis ts & CORF Net Joint Operating Payroll MATERIALS, SUPPLIES & SERVICES Gasoline, Oil & Fuel Insurance Office Expense Operating Expense Chlorine & Odor Control Chemicals Chemical Coagulants Other Operating Supplies Contractual Services .Professional Services Printing & Publications Rents & Leases--Equipment Repairs & Maintenance Research & Monitoring Travel, Meeting & Training Utilities Other Expenses Prior Year~ Expenses Total Material & Supplies TOTAL JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE Less: Revenues NET JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE .FLOW IN MILLION GALS GALLONAGE CHARGES 1 2 3 g 7 11 5,442 MG 14,078 15,033 2, 714 2,784 3,124 3 316 46, '191 MG 2,711,521 479,114 3,190,635 1,000,000 2,190,635 ... 54,000 37,150 25,000 75,000 350,000 94,200 79,800 70,100 25,000 20,000 218,000 150,150 17,000 647,000 10,000 40,000 1,912,400 4,103,035 225,000 3.878.035 1,755,651 955,870 296,400 182' 714 ~ ----2,052,051 1, 138, 584 695,973 30'1 02Z ' 1,356,078 834,557 29,266 24,734 38,409 (1, 259) 11, 420 13' 580 75,853 (853) 28, 710 321,290 70,178 24' 022 ·30, 001 49,799 31,164 38,936 18,138 6,862 14, 726 5,274 199,985 18,015 89,406 60,744 9,751 7' 2t!9 366,850 280,150 8, 911 1,089 5,831 34,169 1,028,599 883,801 2,384,677 1,718,358 194,493 30:507 22190.184 1,687,851 GALLON.AGE CHARGE 256,386 663,233 708,189 127,842 131,144 147,170 156,220 2,190,184 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.I SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1975 BUDGET REVIEW Remaining 19711~75 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: . District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, March 31st .. 1,120,778 1,833,000 27,000 267,586 1:-469,000 .. 4,482,419 95,463 489,083 52,800 FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Sunflower Interceptor Litigation I-8-3 Metering Facilities Share of Joint Works Expansion l l. CO/lfPLETED PROPRRTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative ·'lcilities ~ity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-3·0-14 26 26 526,838 21,657 4,238,544 11, 593 16,078 5,326,354 10,141,090 3,902,176 695,489 474,822 63' 943 274,689 S,411,119 16,838 1,202,609 88,638 256,386 21,698 1,5860169 3,824,950 1974-75 Additions 3,130 13,709 16,839 1,202,609 1, 219.1._4 4~8 __ 425,289 1,358,178 (36,943) (7,103) 1,452,162 3,279,810 6,825 232,697 31,102 Balance 3-31-75 : 3,156 13,709 16,865 1,729,447 21,657 4,238,544 11, 593 16,078 5,326,354 ll,360,538 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1975 BUDGET REVIEW -... Remaining 1971·1-75 Budc;et Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: 'l1axes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, March 31st 4,893,898 5,758,000 813,637 2,622,356 14,846,367 11,042,490 571,494 l,249,887 200,700 FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN.PROGRESS: Santa Ana River Interceptor Projects Carbon Canyon Interceptor Yorba Linda Pump Station .Carbon Canyon -Palm Drive Interceptor Projects Other Projects and I-8-3 Metering Facilities Share of Joint Works Expansion '" COMPLETED PIJ.OPERTY, PDANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Trleatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities Equity in Joint Treat~ent Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-3·0-7 4 10,409,361 71, 380 45,896 21,755 53,910 10,602,302 l, 654 ,·127 212,246 12,243,082 1,186 33, 172 28,616 16,723,307 41,498,038 ~4,346,524 2, 949, 717 1,490,812 625,639 _ l,866,897 21,279,589 3,874,474 3,777,670 522, 95·0 663,233 97.402 8,935,729 12,343,860 1974-75 Additions 1,990,099 1,360,252 118, 23~ 367,386 38,501 3,874,474 3 ,·777, 670 7,652,144 1,944,181 4,267,188 187,998 755,459 10,971,893 7,264,820 48,544 586,654 103, 298 Balance ·3 :H 7S 12,399,460 1,431,632 164,132 389,141 92, 411 14,476,776 5,431,797 212,246 12,243,082 1,186 33, 172 •• 28,616 16, 723, 307 '-' -12.JSO, 182 COUNTY SANIT/\TION DISTRICl NO. 3 ·suMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1975 BUDGET REVIEW Remaining 1974-75 Budget Year to· Date Budget Beginning Fund Bala~ces, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances . EXPENDITURES: . District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retire~ent and Interest Expense Share of Joirit Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, March 31st 6,874,186 6,563,000 660,323 1,290,643 15,715,987 11,130,296 797,334 1,333,264 349,000 FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: S~are of Knott Interceptor, Rchs 1,2 &3 Knott Interceptor Reach 4 Imperial Relief Interceptor Knott Interceptor Reaches 5 & 6 Other Projects and I-8-3 Metering Facilities Share of Joint Works Expansion COftfPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Proper~y Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities .. General Plant and Administrative "'8.cilities ~ity in Joint Treatment Fncilit1.cs Total Propcrty·Tlant & Equipment Balance 6-30-74 5,816,836 2,155,949 46,915 78,833 88,635 8,187,168 1,804,103 236,105 18,051,115 15,036 28,419 27,092 18,239,568 46,588,606 15,518,154 4,192,082 1,625,980 893,903 J,082,584 23.312.703 3,666,224 4,116,~H2 726,519 708,188 135,816 . 9,353,159 13,959.544 1974-75 Additions (6,356) 2,411,187 710, 767 355,523 195,103 3,666,224 4,116,412 7,782,636 2, 682' 104 4,937,020 (233,580) 208,059 12,049,763 7 ,013,884 70,815 625,076 213., 184 Balance 3--31-75 5,.810,480 4, 56"l_, 136 757,682 434,356 283,738 11, 853' 392 5,920,515 236,105 18,051,115 15,036 28,419 27,092 18,239,568 54,371,242 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1975 BUDGET·REVIEW Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Ta4es Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances . EXPENDITURES: . District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, March 31st 197 1 J~75 Budget 886,465 1,227,000 125,000 120,944 647,885 2,598,859 29,515 23?,204 393,451 FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Pump Station Modifications Coast Highway Force Main Litigation Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROPE'RTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities .Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-74 708 708 352,690 6,231 3,096,365 7,347 7I115 8,946 3,565, 713 7,045,115 Year to Date _l,840,268 550,938 317,868 19,627 143,410 2,872,111 9,215 805,083 26,976 127,842 157,966 1,127,082 1. 745. 029 1974-75 Additions 8,306 909 9,2i5 805,084 814,299 Remaini.ng Budc;et 335,527 909,132 105,373 (22,466) 638,670 1,793,776 2,539 107,362 235,485 Balance 3: 31 7Si 9,014 909 9,923 1,157,774 6,231 3,096,365 7,347 7, 115 -... 8,946 3 I 565 I 713 '-"' 7,859,'114 _.· COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1975 BUDGET REVIEW Remaining 19711-75 Budget Year to D2.te Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVBNUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDl"TURES: . . District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirem~nt and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, March 31st 583,340 1,122,000 4,000 145,998 425,000 2,712,024 36,328 248,395 71, 100 FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Pump Station Modifications Coast Highway Force Main Litigation I-8-3 Metering Facilities Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Ri~hts Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative 1cilities ~uity in Joint Treatment Facilities ~Total Property ~lant & Equipment Balance 6-3·0-14 3,121 3,121 322,475 562 624,407 2,653 7,394 23,743 3,~60,~ 4,244,594 1,979,077 356,410 290,637 . 4, 996 141,490 2,772,610 11, 287 736,112 33,277 131,144 24,291 936, 111 -~1J',...;.'8:_~_2_ 1974-75 Additions 2,837 54 8,396 11, 287 736, 112 747,399 226,930 831,363 (996) 4,508 413, 713 1,975,912 . 3,051 117,251 46_, 809 Balance ·_3-31-75 5,958 54 8,396 14,408 1,058,587 562 624,407 2,653 7,394 23,743 _ _h.f60. 2 39 _1., 9!11, 99.l.._ -· COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1975 BUDGET REVIEW Remaining 1974-75 Budget Year to Date Budr:et Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REl'h'NUES: Taxes . Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Otr~er Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPBNDITURES: . . District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balarices, March 31st 1,812,630 1,539,000 276,000 278,636 2,675,346 3,770,680 670,315 288,522 533,919 FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Sunflower Interceptor Litigation Subtrunk (Diversion) Extensions Tustin Orange Trunk I-8-3 Metering Facilities Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rl~hts Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities . General Plant and Administrative Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property·Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-74 61 31,757 17,537 49,355 442,236 217,752 15,977,077 10,782 8,082 4, 471, 026 21,176,310 4,565,041 1,091,500 398,573 270,746 342,307 6,668,167 155,995 1, 009 ,,489 463,801 147,170 110,476 1,886,931 4,781,236 1974-75 Additions 7,303 141, 311 7,382 155,996 1,909,489 1,165,485 721,130 1,140,427. 5,254 (63,671) 2,519,351 2,761,191 206,514 141,352 42~,443 Balance 3-31-75. 7,364 31,757 158,848 7,382 205,351 1,451,725 217,752 15, 977, 077 10,782 8,082 4,471,026 ~ 22, 34~, 795 ··- ; . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1975 BUDGET·REVIEW Remaining 19711-75 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: fJ.1a:x;e.s Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: . District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, March 31st 1,140,081 1,361,000 5, oo·o 210,168 1,501,000 3,679,832 96,985 304,280 204,230 FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Share of Knott Interceptor Reaches 1 & 2 Slater Avenue Trunk Slater Avenue Wetwell .Slater Avenue Pump Station Improvements · I-8~3 Metering Facilities Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED fRO'fERTY, PLANT & E(!UIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative .cilities .~~li ty in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment . Balance 6-30-74 402,131 457,897 5,254 865:,282 391,145 16,936 2,937,832 3,053 17, 116 3,954,498 8,185,862 3,536,048 692,806 352,527 9,263 254,688 4,845,332 58,095 892,865 87,660 156,220 100,041 1,294,881 3,550,451 1974-75 Additions (723) 2,520 45,448 8, o:fo 2,820 58,095 892,865 950,960 447,275 l,008,473 (4' 263) ( 44, 520) 1,442,905 2,786,967 9,325 148,060 104,189 Balance i:..31_75· 401,408 460,417 50,702 8,030 2,820 923,377 1,284,010 16,936 2,937,832 3,053 17,116 3,954,498 9,136,822 AGENDA ITEM NO, 13 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 May 13, 1975 • 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 M E M 0 R A N 0 U M ---------- TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager FROM: W. N. Clarke, Superintendent SUBJECT: Sludge Handling and Disposal The attached print of Plant No. 2 delineates the areas of immediate concern regarding the handling, drying, and disposal of the Districts' sludge. There are areas, which are noted, in which the sludge should be dried and removed; there are other areas in which the sludge drying should be set up as a windrow operation on a continuing basis to adequately handle the sludge as it is produced in our centrifuges·and as it is removed from the drying beds. You will also note one drying bed which should be emptied within the next 45 days. Beyond these points, it is also noted that sludge should be removed from Plant No. 1 as it is produced by our centrifuges and that the open air drying beds should be emptied during the summer months. The priority of operation should be: (1) The establishment and continual operation of an approved windrow drying system in the area noted on the plans as North #1 --IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIREq (2) Removal of all sludge from the area noted on the plans as South #1 --BY JUNE 10 (3) Removal of the sludge from the area noted on the plans as North #2 --BY JUNE 10 (4) The establishment and continual operation of an approved windrow drying system in the area noted on the plahs as South #2 SIGNIFICANT EFFORT BY JUNE 10 (5) Emptying of the bed noted as Middle #1 --SOME EFFORT BY JUNE 10; COMPLETED BY JUNE 30 (6) A continuing program which includes the trucking of sludge from Plant No. 1 to Plant No. 2 as it is produced in the s 1 udge hoppers --IMMEDIATE ACT I ON REQU I RE.D (7) The emptying of the beds at Plant No. 1 and the emptying of the other beds at Plant No. 2 in the middle and north sections --BY SEPTEMBER 1 ·AGENDA ITEM #14 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY ~955 Workman Mill Road I Whittier, California 90601 Mailing Address: I P. 0. Box 4998, Whittier, California 90607 Telephone: (213) 699-7411 I from Los Angeles (213) 685-5217 JOHN D. PARKHURST Chief Engineer and General Manager May 7, 1975 Mr. Winn Adams, Chairman State Water Resources Control Board 1015 Resources Building 1416 Ninth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Mr. Adams: On April 29, 1975 Mr. Donald Winn, Joint Chairman of the Sanitation Districts of Orange County, wrote a letter to you regarding the advisability of forming an advisory committee composed of local elected officials and a member of the State Water Resources Control Board for the purpose of discussing and reviewing proposed State regulations involv-·- ing policy matters affecting local entities. A copy of the letter was sent to the Sanitation Districts and it has been brought to my attention. The suggestion included in the Orange County letter is enthusiastically endorsed by the writer. As Chairman of the Board of Directors of Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles County, please be advised that I would like to participate in any future discussions directed toward the formation of such an advisory committee. Sanitation District No. 2 acts as .the Administrative District for all of the Sanitation Districts in Los Angeles County. The current thrust toward expediting the award of construction contracts by your Board and the Governor's staff would indicate that every effort should be made to adminis- tratively avoid conflicts between local and state agencies which might delay implementation of the program. The Sanita- tion Districts are committed to full cooperation toward the early completion of engineering and award of major construc- tion contracts which will help to allay the high unemployment in this area. If this program is to proceed in an orderly manner, all parties concerned should cooperate and fully participate in the formulation of new regulations which could affect the entire grants program. GG:cam cc: Donald Winn Yours very truly, ~4~~ Garth Gardner, Chairman Board of Directors of Cou~ty Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles County AGE~DA ITEM NO. (15)(d)(2) ALL DISTRICTS RE: Proposed Ordinance(s) Establishing Regulations for Use of District(s) Sewerage Facilities The following additional conununications proposed ordinances, copies of which are have been attached received hereto: From Dated City of Seal Beach March 27, 1975 Public Works Direct6r/City Engineer March 28, 1975 City of Cypress April 3, 1975 · Embee Plating May 1, 1975 Kraftco Corporation May 1, 1975 Kraftco Corporation May 6, 1975 Shur-Plate Co. May 8, 1975 All Metals Processing, Inc. May 12' 19,75 re r i ~ ..,-+ ·--·** :z.-:J i!QS? ·! ,, ; ....... J. . ~ -, ~ .. \ -·-' ·~ \r'.1 . :·1,:iLrt ,'· .. ~--· ····-· -------··-···----·--··---. -·-------·· -~----··· -~· -·· r---~·--~~-~___..,,._.,....,._.... __,_ ____ ... ._....,.. __ _ L. • •z March 27, 1975 Mr. John D. Thomas Chief of Industrial & Permit Division Orange County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: Proposed Wastewater Ordinance Dear Mr. Thomas: • ht a r -· ' · tr· · · · ·a·· e 1 t ' 1 ~ A review of your ordinance has created several questions that were difficult to answer on the telephone. We believe we have three residential develqpments that may·incur an extra expense due to the ordinance. Leisure World is the first development. It includes approximately 6,500 apartments and a lot of landscaping. Their average daily water consumption is 950,000 gallons per day for approximately 10,000 people. The assessed valuation is $16,141,550 (net). The second development is the Oakwood apartment complex with little landscaping at the southwest corner of First Street and Pacific Coast Highway. Its water consumption is 71,500 gallons per day. Its assessed valuation is $1,689,030 (net). The old trailer park at the northwest corner of Marina Drive and First Street uses 37,200 gallons per day and its assessed value is $98,680 (net). At your convenience I would appreciate advising me of the estimated additional expense, if any, that these developments will incur when the ordinance is adopted. Very truly yours, Cl/J J>F S,EAL BEA~~ ~«~~ Harold A. Halldin Director of Public Works and City Engineer HAH/la 1 l i _J --·-·-----, ti CITY-OF CYPRESS 5 2 7 5 O R A N G E AV E N U E, CY P R ES S, CA L I .F 0 R N I A 9 0 6 3 0 t A R EA C 0 D E (7 1 4) 8 2 8 -2 2 0 0 April 3, 1975 County Sanitation Districts P. O. Box 8127 FoUI_ltain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. John D. Thomas Dear Mr. Thomas: -In response to your request for comments relative to the proposed ordinance establishing regulations for use of district sewerage facilities, I.am transmitting a copy of a memorandum from the City Public Works Director/ . City Engineer regarding the proposed ordinance. Although this response is being transmitted to you too late for presentation at the public meetings held on this matter, I trust the comments made by Mr. Schatzeder will be taken into consideration by your office. We appreciate the opportunity to respond on this matter and if you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter further, I would suggest that you contact Mr. Art Schatzeder at 828-2200, Ext. 52. i:y~. Brian N. Hawley Planning Director BNH:jd Enclosure cc: Art Schatzeder TO: FROM: RE: MEMORANDUM March 28, 1975 Brian aawley, Planning Director A. W. Schatzeder, Public Works Director/City Engineer Proposed Waste Water Discharge Ordinance Orange County Sanitation District The preface to the Ordinance states: The purpose of this Ordinance is to provide maximum public benefit from the use of sewerage facilities within the Orange County Sanitation Districts, to improve the quality of wastewater being received for treatment by regulation of wastewater discharges and to provide a method of procedures for establishing equitable user costs for District's sewerage facilities. Page 1 states that an implication of the District's goal of improving the ·quality of waste· water will discourage an increase in the quantity (the mass emission) of waste constituents being discharged. This implication will un- doubtedly place.heavier costs on industrial users to reduce these constituents before they get into the public disposal system.· Page 2 --The statement that " ••• may necessitate ·more stringent qualitrr..a..-_ quirements on wastewater dischargers than those required by other government -... --- regulatory agencies." also indicates that industrial users in Orange Coul)ty may be at an economic disadvantage if they are required to provide a better quality effluent. Page 13 --Under "Connection Permits", the proposed Ordinance requires "connection of laterals to local municipality sewage facilities" to obtain District permit. There should not be a blanket requirement that connections to the City's local sewer system require a District permit. If this Ordinance is to be endorsed by the City !CH 2 the types of uses required to obtain District permits should be specifically listed. The paragraph is also inconclusive with "dwelling units, buildings, developments " I suggest that we should oppose this requirements. Pag~ 3 indicates that Clas~ I permit must obtai"l a permit with a Class I user being defined as a user who has a discharge flow of 50,000 gallons or more per work day. A high density residential development is estimated to produce 5800 gpd/acre with low·density residential, 1550 gpd/acre. If this Ordinance were strictly interpreted, a 30 acre rcsident_ial subdivision or a 9 acre apartment development would be required to get a permit from the District. These requirements MAR 3 1 mn ,, : • ' /I' A-V ~ •' .. should be justified by the District. The requirement would cause developers additional difficulties. I don't have any data but 50,000 gallons a day is not a large development. For example; a 13 acre industrial development would, at 3880 gpd/acre, produce 50,000 gpd. Page 15 --The ·applicant may be required to subit plans for evaluation but does not state who decides what infonnation is to be submitted. Page 18 --Table II qu·Jtes fees imposed for non-compliance. I don't know what the basis is for the charge. The same comment would apply to Table III on Page 19. Page 20 a~d 21 --Describes a permit revocation procedure for violation of the Ordinc.nce and states that the General Manager "have the right to revoke the permit". Page 22 -states that "waste water constituents and characteristics will not be recognized as confidential information". This is a good provision. Page 25 --Section 3 requires a Class II permit for "users who discharge more than their proportionate share ••• but less t;han 50,000 gallons per day". The Ordinance does not contain any provisions for determiµing proportionate share other than the users ad valorem taxes which pay for District services. The next paragraph states: "Discharges of domestic waste, by virtue of occupancy . of a dwelling unit, may not be required to obtain a permit. However, said users shall be subject to payment of their reasonably proportionate share of all District's costs." It appears that this paragraph would allow the District to impose a service charge on every user in the County for treating waste water including all residential units. Thls may conflict with the ability of the Cfty in the future to impose some sort of sewer maintenance assessment to pay for cost of maintaining City sewers. It-appears that the District will really be able to tighten up on use of .District facilities by means of this Ordinance and would also be able to impose a use tax on every user of the District facility which would extend to the individual residential unit. AWS:bb cc: Darrell Essex, City Nanager .. EMBEE II -PLATlrJG Plating -Painting· Anodizing -Shot Peening To Mil Specifications . 2136 SOUTH HATHAWAY • SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92705 • (714) 546-9842 (213) 860-8501 County Sanitation Districts Oran6e County, Calif. Attn: J·ohn D. Thomas Chief of Industrial & Permit Division Dear Sir: While in the main, the proposed oi1dinance regulc .. ting quality of waste Nater for the Fountain Valley Sanitation District appears to be more cognizant bf problems imposed upon industry by this type of regulation, there still appears to be some basic inequi- ties inherent to the document. ~s of this writinrr, the areas of major concern to us a.re· as fallows: 1. Section 402 -Charges for use great$r than reascnable use As presehted, this entire section -does not appear to be found- ed upon logic. Although an arbitrary figure for 11 greater than reasonaole use" can be established from the definitions found in the section, there is no real definition of ·this term to .be found anyvihere in the section. It is our contention that our waste water disposal quantities were· -or should have been - taken into consideration at the time we were origii1ally hooked up for sewerage service. Certainly at that time had there been any question of excess dische.r~e ~ .. ,e would have been re- quired to make payment for such enlarged facilities as the ap- propriate engineering office deemed necessary. It is furtheF our 2.rgument that since we have been for some years, and ;-!.re currently, disposing of sewzrage 1'..rith no ap~)arent disruption to district facilities th~t De are at no time entering into a use "greater th2n reasonable use''. It seems thnt this sec- tion of the ordinance is aimed et being a revenue without cost device, and i·re do not understand the reasoninc; behind it. He will not attempt to comment in detail upon this section at this time, the entire section is totally unacceptable as written. 2. ~able 1 -Discharge Limit~, rng/L There has already been much discussion concerning metallic contaminant 1imi ts. At this time we i·.ri:.:;h only. to say that we do not feel that the liri1its of 2 ppm and:~· ppm established for chrome can be met. We wish.to also point out to ·you that if the metallic limits set forth in th ls table o.rc imposed only 11pon industry, it is doubtful thnt (u·sch:.1rr::e J.ir:1itatlr.ms imposed upon your facilj.- tics can be met. 11'his i~~ primnrily trtw of total· chrome, but EMBEE • PLATING Plating -Painting -Anodizing -Shot Peening To Mil Specifications 2136 SOUTH HATHAWAY • SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92705 • (714) 546-9842 (213) 860-8501 Page 2 •• !' will also include several other metals. The theory of achieving sanitation district discharge limita- tions by establishing source discharge limits is i·rnll under- stood, but it is our feeling that if source requirements are levied only upon a few specific tipes of industry the overall intent of permitting the district facilities to comply with limitations set for them, will not be achieved, and those in- · dustries designated for source control will then have spent large sums of money in support of an overall program that will not succeed. J~ Changes in Ordinance to bring it more in line with other Ordinances We disagree with this concept entirely. Each case of water pollution is unique unto itself, and must be evaluated on its own. We_ do not understand why we in the Fountain Valley Dis- trict should be subject to a restriction simply because others in.other districts are. 4. Preface -We do not understand the following statement: 11 I~ is not the intent of this ordinanc~ to require.a permit for every industrial and commercial user v1i thtn the boundaries of the Sanitation District. 'fhe permit procedures provide a method to equalize the distribution of costs for all users of facilities v.ri thin the .Ji strict. 11 If all users are not registered, hov.1 can there be an eqw:1l e:.1s- tri bution of costs? Prom its wording, it would anpear that the ~~Excess· flm-1 11 (section 402) requirer;ient 1·:ould be 2~pplicable to almost any industrial or commcrc lal user, but if these users D.re not issued :permits, hm·1 1·Jill they be ~mown? In summary, it is our feeline that the ordinance as written is neither fair nor eauitable to all industrial/commercial users of the Jistrict's facilities. It appears that 8 very small percent~GC of these users will be required to pay a disproportionate share of costs for the operation of the District'c facilities. We further feel that ·limitations set forth in the -proposed ordinance are not realistic· in vieH of the· stD.te of the art in pollution con- trol, ~nQ that the imposition of these limits on only a sm2ll pcr- centace of fi1cility users will ~ot result in the accomplishment of the Sanitation District's overall goals. -. ~ ..... Efv1BEE • PLATING Pia.ting· Painting· Anodizing· Shot Peening To Mil Specifications 2136 SOUTH HATHAWAY • SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92705 • (714) 546-9842 (213) 860-8501 Page J .•• We ask that those rcsponsi ble for :_.he prepo.ration and enactment of regul2tions consider the fact th~t even the EPA has agreed to re-evaluate its prior standards in the .c2se of the.2lectro-plating industry. We ask thgt we be spared the neccesity of investing large sums of money in source control equipment that may either prove· to be unneces 22.ry -or -m2.y never be capable of meeting adjudicated liraitations that are not practical. we·are firmly in support of practical and equitable discharge limitations, but we do not feeJ. that those expressed by the pro- posed ordinance alway$ fall into either of these categories. As always we will support the Sanitation District in its attempt~ to evolve suitable legislation in any manner that vre can. WES/blp W. E. nyder Mgr-Quality Embee Plat~ng " \. . . . ~· . .'.' ·, ._..,.. .. ' f...i ., . ~ .,.~ "".•~·· ~,..~~,.1, ,. I• ·' I t ~, ... • \ ' I•" . f '" i -!-t' l I'' ~~ .J,,/• t ~:-fr.» ..... ~ 1lli, ·,.I t • • • , 1 j I 1 "' • .; r ft , ;i:,. ;\•I -• \, ~ •• ; D· ·~ l l • •. 1 -\ .. Jr ... '' If~ . , ~ .. ?T~l_i ' :~~;.f PLATarjQJ ' ~, "~>:1F·~·-.. .J· · · Plating· Painting· Anodizing· Shot Pcsni~g tTo'Mll Specifications , I , .. • q . •\f'' ' . 2136 SOUTH HATHAWAY • SANTA ANA, t~~IF:~r~~;.?;., -~· .. (714) 546-9842 (213) 860-8501 . . •· ~· ~· ...... ~ ~~ 1/'197.5 . . '. ·~ ~·1 • "! .. 1:: , .. f . , ' ·~· .~ To: I-1ayor of Santa Ana cc to Vice M&yor ~c;.n ta ,;..ria City Hall 20 Civic Center Plaza Sent~ hna, Calif. 92701 · ,·,,, I • (o ', .. •. . t111 .. · -· •\1 t ' . -~:ii { .... L L.JI f• I ... , ' ' t. .:. ~'l' t; :.· ·~ ;l, ' ; Honorable h'lyor John Garthe: . · As an indi1stry loci:.tod in your c1'{y ,:, EXb~e Platinr: feels thElt 1 t mvst take excertior: to certc..in aspects .. of a proposed ordlnance for regulation of discharges to th'e Fountain Valley Sanitation Di t 1 t . "• '• ~ . tt ·I ~,..· .' ~·· .. s r c . · v · • . · · ·~·, 1··~~ .. · ' , ... , \ •• ~.' t 1, :· ~. .~ You ~.Jill ho.ve to vote upon this;:propose:d. ord1nance in your· ca.pa- ci ty aa a nember of th0 Board or ~~Dire·ctors ·of the District, and we ask tha.t you revi~w the objectfons':-we. h'ave set r'orth in the attached copy of a letter we have submi tt,~".1·t:~o Ehe d1strict. We are conc~rned ·about our ~~~·fr·o'~~e~·tfi·.~~.~ork here, and we live ·•: ~~·· here toe. But, we ::ire not interested ~n seeing another "NOX" pro- gram. We want to continue to work. witti .the .. Sanitation District · to develope a fair, sensible t-eq~~tabler.foi1d:1nance. · · • •¥ • , ~·J 'r r • . . 1 ~ ' ' fl. I we 8.J':e particularly concerned w1 ~·h···t~~·)~ffo.rts taken to make the ord:lnanc e "more in 1 ine with those.! of· either. districts". We· are not in other disti·icts or cities/:·· ... ~'/~ !ire 1n Santa .ttna. We are here, been.use at the time we wer~)choo~1ng our re-location site, 1·:e f'elt th~3.t S···:nta Ana offered .unique qpportunitles ~.md capabilities to our firm. vJs hope th'.'t you wi)l'.?never permit legislation to be cnactAd thAt. would detract frci.m .ther~desirable attributes of this c 1 ty in order to "bring it .. mo~e 4n 11µe '' w1 th other c 1t1 es. . f:.' ~ .l " ,. Than I< yc~1 for your consideratio'n.~i-n· th~s ··matter. We. will be pres- ent at the 2·co.rtl meetinGs on bot11; ·the .14th and 29th of rtiay ~houl<l; you desire t.o utilize un in any [iash1on• ,. r . 11, · , .. ~~~. ·• ..... :.:~~J: 1 " .? ~, .. • ..... ;~'· ·- 1S1n ·: rely, ; . ~>,· ·Y ~ ,,d#~. ~1· ~fk.K_.£_ __ _ •.•. . ; ~l • J.·~!iDa ~d C. Blake ~ . l>r.~~ 1de11 t .d ~?~e Pla.tin{s I"' ~ I : ~ ~ . L 'I · · .... r•t .. ! •. • ~" " ·Of'. ·' , ; '~ I" ' i~ JCH/ulp ,1 " I~ ~:' ·~ .. ~,:, · :"· i. ·r ·'!~' ~ ... •.' ~;I ' . . ·~ . : ' Jl...\li ,,, f'.' 1 .• , .. . ,--~ . ® Kraftco Corporation RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 801 Waukegan Road Glenview, Illinois 60025 May 1, 1975 Mr. John Thomas Chief of Industrial and Permit Division Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley California 29708 Dear Mr. Thomas: We have benefited from the opportunity to talk with you and your associates, by telephone, on the proposed Orange County Sanitation District's ordinance and receiving draft copies from our local pl.ants as it evolved. We have been happy to note the progessive improvements in the successive texts of the ordinance. As is our usual custom, we have been receiving comments from our Legal Department on the ordinance as it has developed because it fs our belief that such ordinances should also be completely sound from a legal standpoint. For this reason, you are being supplied herewith a copy of the most recent memorandum of comment ·from our Legal Department. Since these points have also occurred to me in reviewing the text of this ordinance, it appears that full consider·ation should be given to incorporate them in the final version of the ordinance. We are in agreement with your people that the soundest way of working out the final specifications which will be listed in a plant permit is that of your people sitting down with ours, reviewing the wastewater data available and agreeing upon appli- cable discharge load figures. Our peqple will be happy to work with yours when it becomes timely to arrive at such permit specifications. We appreciate the cooperative attitude your organization has used in developing this ordinance and the opportunity which you have given all interested parties to input to your effort. If we can aid in any way as you go to the remaining stages of finalizing the ordinance, make it a point to call on us. s!;~ely, ~-vJ K. ·s. Watson Director of Environmental Control KSW/dcz cc: D. T. Moring KRAFTCO LAW DEPA ATM ENT Memorandum Da~: April 29, 1975 To: K. S. Watson From: D. T. Moring Re: Proposed Orange Co~nty Sanitary District Ordinance - Revised 4/75. I have reviewed the referenced ordinance and have several comments which I.believe should be called to your attention. Since we would be a·c1ass I user under the terms of the ordinance, I shall limit my comments to those affecting our Buena Park complex. 1. The revised draft ordinance has corrected some of the problems I raised in my prior memo.· Specifi- cally, the broad request for information concerning production processes and production.rates have been deleted. In addition, the confidential infor- mation section has been revised. 2. The term of the permit has been extended to up to three years. 3. However, there remains several problems which I believe deserve comment. The Class I permit system envisions establishing mass emission limitations for contaminants in the discharge based upon the average daily discharge for the past three years, §302.21. Noncompliance with that emission rate subjects the discharger to l} noncompliance fees in §302.21, (b} and/or enforcement actions in Article 5. If a discharger believes the mass · emission rate.contained in the permit is unreasonable, he may take an appeal pursuant to §506. However, the contested limitation is not stayed during the pendency of the appeal and therefore, it appears that the discharger is subject to the sanctions mentioned above. I believe that the terms of this ordinance result in a denial of procedural due process. I suggest that the procedure to be followed is one similar to that used in the NPDES adjudicatory hearing procedure. See 40 CFR 125.35 (c} (2). As you are aware, in the NPDES system, contesting a provision in an NPDES permit stays the effect of that . . Page 2 April 29, 1975 K. s. Watson determination pending the final decision of the Administrator. I believe that Section 506 should be amended by adding: ~During the pendency of any appeal contained in this section, the contested provisions of ·any permit ·Shall be stayed and the user shall not be subject to any non-compliance charges nor subject to any enforcement actions contained in Article S." 4. I believe the inspection and sampling section on .page 20 should be modified to conform to the access provisions applicable to the Buena Park complex. As you are aware, no visitor is allowed into the complex without a pass and an escort from the plant. I believe this proposed section should be modified by deleting the words "without delay" to reflect the normal operating procedure of the plant. One can envision a situation where the plant manager or quality control manager are unavailable for a short period, which could result in a delay. Refusal of "reasonable access" is cause for a permit revocation under the terms of §302.21 (b) (7). 5. I believe that the causes for permit revocation should be modified to conform to what I perceive to be the intent of the revised ordinance. This revision has deleted the emphasis on production. I believe that. §302. 21 (b} (5} (b} (2) should be amended by ·deleting the words "operations or". Thus, the section would mean that failure to report significant changes in wastewater constituents and characteristics is the ground for revocation of a permit. If you have any ·further questions, or would desire more information, please contact me. . ' L JI J>~ . .,.. DTM I DTM: sp cc: R. E. Scheible c. K. Meierhofer -Humko -Memphis L. E. Lynch .I 1 ( . . --' ... .. . . I ' ~ ® Kraftco Corporation RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 801 Waukegan Road Glenview. Illinois 60025 May 6, 1975 Mr. John Thomas Chief of Industrial and Permit Division Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley California 29708 Dear Mr. Thomas: As a result of discussions among professional representatives. of the environmental area in Kraftco, it appears there is another matter in the technical area, which has been carried in your evolv- ing ordinance from the beginning, which should be addressed to get the document into the optimum workable form. Perhaps this is an area which your people feel can be resolved in the conference with industrial people in establishing the limits for a particular plant. It is our experience with many ordinances across the country, how- ever, that it is better if questionable points can be resolved in the final draft of the ordinance. The point which is bothering us is contained in 302.21, 1 (b) on page 16 of the April 1975 draft, that of basing a tentative non-compliance determination on a single grab sample. The absolutely minimum change, which should be made in the interest of getting a reasonably representative sample, is that of making the determination based on a daily composite. An instantaneous grab sample of an industrial waste is not representative of anything at all. Recent precedent, based on more critical .permits being issued by EPA, because of direct stream discharges, as you know, establishes the evaluation period as the 30 day average. We have some plants where the average for a period of a week, or 7 consecutive days of composite samples, is listed as the contractual basis used by the village to accept the waste load or assess a surcharge. Other ordinances of course establish the load, or concentration on which the surcharge for the next year is based, as the average which occurred during the last year. ·,. .. ·• .... • • • • j Mr. John Thomas May 6, 1975 Page 2 It would appear that the matter could be resolved in one of two ways in a manner that the District would not have to be continuously running sampling and evaluation surveys, and industry would be assured that it was being evaluated on the basis of representative samples: 1. The requirement for an approved monitoring station would be formalized. When results from samples taken from this station, either as determined by inspection· of data being maintained by the industry or analysis of such samples by the District indicated non-compliance, then a sampling and evaluation survey would be run by the District. · 2. The non-compliance determination would be based on exceeding the limits on average results obtained from limits on composite samples for a normal consecutive 7 day period. We are grateful for the opportunity of commenting on your evolving ordinance. Sincerely, ~) K. S. Watson Director of Environmental Control KSW/dcz SHUR-PLATE CO. ~ard Chrome -Cadmium -Zinc -Copper -Nick.el ·-Barrel Plating -To Military Specifications Mr. John D. Thomas Chief of Industrial and Permit Division County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. Thomas: 375 WEST TRUSLOW FULLERTON. CALIF .. 92632 714. 525-3881 May 8, 1975 'Thank you for the opportunity of expressing my thoughts regarding the pro- posed ordinance for County Sanitation Districts of Orange County during the last .. series of public hearings. I feel you people have shown excellent judgement in your approach to this matter. I have been studying the revised, April, 1975. (Tentative) Ordinance and I am surprised to find a new 'Fox in the chicken coop'. I refer to the Excess capacity charge •• ." •• , Article 4, par. 402. It appears that this section has been in effect since 1971 and it seems that it could have. been included in the previous proposals. The timing of it's entry upon the scene raises some que~tions in my mind. The primary one being; Why now? I have studied 402 and find (1) It appears to be a legal obstruction to the growth of Industry. (2) The excess capacity connection charges are q~ite in excess of anything reasonable. (3) I rather doubt that any 'peak flow rates' are established other than that relating to assessed valuation and I find no true relationship in that norm. (4) It is unclear. The·more I study this Ordinance, the more I become convinced that it is not - as stated -'for maximum publ i.c benefit'. On the contrary, it appears to be one more governmental regulation intended to strangle Industry and Commerce. I trust the Board of Directors has giyen this matter thorough study and will come to the $8me conclusion. cc: ~.rayor Ward -Fullerton Vice-Mayor Phillips -Fullerton __ ""~----.-...-----'~"<" H. Elwell, Shttr-Pl~t-P rn"i"n.l'\,,..Ht--1,.,. .... all r~1e1als Pnocessmg .. me. 8305 STANDUSTRIAL AVE. STANTON, CALIF. 90680 17141 828-8238 Mr. John Thomas Fountain Valley Sanitation Dist. P. 0. Box 9127 Fountain Valley, Calif. 92708 Dear Mr. Thomas: May 12, 1975 Last Friday we received a copy of the proposed ordinance establishing regulations for use of the District's Sewerage facilities. In reviewing this proposed ordinance it becomes readily apparent that it is aimed, not at the majority of.Orange County residents, but rather at a meager few who will be obligated to pay fees way beyond the reach of these few. Certainly we concur that regulations affecting our discharge wastewaters are necessary. No conscientious businessman or individual desires to polute, in any way, waters going into your sanitation facilities. However, your discharge limits and the fines connected thereto are prohibitive. It is my contention that, if a facility, is· in fact discharging excessive polluted wastewater, then a means should be established between that facility and your district wherein a method of mutual cooperation be formed so that this facility can be advised as to how to eliminate this unsavory problem quickly and as inexpensively as possible. Not fine that firm unreasonably to a point of closure. This would result in financial disaster.for the firm and further unemployment, -Something none of us wish to see. It is my feeling that extreme care must be executed to avoid charging excessive fees to a few rather than to distribute this charge fairly and justly to all users of the Sanitation District based upon the amount of wastewater being discharged into the system. As your present proposal now stands, All Metals Processing is for the intent, but strongly opposes the method, as outlined ' -........ .., ..... Mr. John Thomas 2 .. Fountain Valley Sanitation Dist. therein for the execution of this ordinance. Vigilance and wisdom must be exercised by the entire Board of Directors of the Sanitation District to assure that this P.roposed ordinance be fair tq all users, whether they be individ~als or companies. RWS:dml AGEND A ITEM #1 7(b ) RESOLUTION NO. 75 -82 -1 GRANTING TIME EXTENSION TO BJ FIBRES INC. RE: SEWER CONNECTION LATE PENALTY CHARGES A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. l, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING TIME EXTENSION TO BJ FIBRES INC. FOR SEWER CONNECTION PRIOR TO IMPOSITION OF LATE PENALTY CHARGES * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, BJ Fibres Inc.was subject to payment of annual use charges pursuant to Ordinance No. 102 for the disposal of industrial wastewater to the sewerage facilities of County sanitation District No. 1, of orange County1 and WHEREAS, appropriate charges for the subject use became due and payable April 15, 1975, forty-five days following said invoice; and WHEREAS, said Company requested special billing for said charges but made no request for a time extension1 and WHEREAS, Article 11, paragraph (b) of the District 's Uniform Connection and Use Ordinance No. 102 provides that the Board of Directors may by resolution consider a special agree- /, ment for situations requiring special consideration1 and WHEREAS, BJ Fibres Inc. on May 7, 1975 applied to th e Board of Directors for special consideration ; anc WHEREAS, good cause having been shown for waiver 0 £ delinquency penalty charges otherwise assessable to BJ Fibre s Inc . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED: That BJ Fibres Inc. be granted an extension of thirty (30) days to and including May 15, 1975 for payment of the annu a l use charges prior to the imposition of any late penalty charges. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting ~~~~~~~~~- 197 5 . '· ./ May 12, 1975 M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: DISTRICT DIRECTORS COUNTY SA NITATION D ISTRICTS of O RANGE CO UNTY , C ALIFOR N IA P.O. BOX 8 127 1084 4 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNT AIN V ALL EY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71 4 ) 540-2910 (714) 96 2-24 11 RE: Request of BJ Fibres for Waiver of Delinquency and Penalty Fees Enclosed herewith please find a copy of a letter fr om BJ Fib r es Inc. dated May 7, 1975. requesting waiver of penalty and delin quency charges assessed pursuant to Connection and Use Ordinance No. 102 (attached Ex hibit 11 F11 ). The Staff does not have authority under the ordinance to waive the charges as requested. However, other Districts ha ve, by reso l ution, granted waivers when circums tances have warranted it. This matter will, therefore, be placed on the Supplemental Agenda for the regular meeting on Wednesday, May 14, for your consideration. Directors will recall that a staff memorandum was r e ce i ved and filed at the February 19th meeting which outlined problems e x perienced with the discharg e s from BJ Fibres. Since that time, the company has installed equipment to improve the s ituation at considerable capital expense. Because of the extenuating circumstances, the staff rec ommends that the re uest for waive r of delinguency and penalty charges be approved s e e attached Exhibit 11 G11 . Follow i ng is a chronology of events regarding the above: Date 2-28-75 4-15-75 4-18-75 4-21-75 5-1-75 5-7-75 5-12-75 JWS/cf Enclo s ures Explanati o n Invoice No. 75-2-1265 issued for use charges in amount of $36,375.67 Form letter re delinquency issued assessing $3,637.57 in charges pursuant to ordinance provisions Letter from BJ Fibres re delinquent charges District 1s letter advising BJ Fibres that staff does not have authority t o waive penalty charges District 1s form letter issued re delinquent penalties and assessing 1/2% pursuant to ordinance provisions Payment of invoice amount $36,375.67 received; penalty payment not received Letter issued by BJ Fibres reques t ing waiver Staff recommendation See Attached Ex hibit ••N• ••B•• • •c .. llDI I 11E11 ''F'' ••G•• .. ..... ·,. .. EXHIBIT "A" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA , ,,0. BOX 1127 INVOICE • 1084' ELLIS AVENUE TO: ll. J. FlililES . 27·Jl ~Oi.Jth !31rch ;;;anta Ana, CA )27J7 J'DUNTAIN VALLEY, CAl.IFORNIA 92709 . • (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 DATE: 2/28/7".J INVOICE NUMBER:· 7~-2-l2G:J REFERENCE: Uniform Connection and Use Ordinance No. 102 . . .. F.OR: Annual Use Charges in Accordance with Referenced Ordinance A. B. c. Assessed Valuation 1974 cl-• ,.,,,2 3· l:\ ~======'~==-'==7V======== Reasonable Use- Volume ,. Solids Computation of Charges Volume -Discharge Reasonable .. Use 115.tJ!.? MG (2) 2.J.23J MG e:·==7~5=· 4=· =-~·.6====Ma @$ ~3. ea =$ · 3, 111. 33· Solids -Discharge 5746. )22 Tons Reasonable Use 3 .. 1. 3~~J Tons ----- ~716.. '.;..63 Tons @$ 10.00:$ :;7 ,105.63 .Leas-~ount paid Invoice 74-7-9~1· (24,501.2~) NET AMOUNT DUE AND PAYABLE (1) Million Gallons (2 ) I•~c1udc3 ~·~!fo losu throu~h ;::roceos . . MAKE ALL CHECKS PAYABLE TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY. ABOVE AMOUNT DUE AND PAYABLE WITHIN FORTY FIVE (45) DAYS OF· INVOICE DATE, AFTER WHICH PENALTIES-AND INTEREST MUST BE ASSESSED. . ,4((J;/~yne Sylvester ~r~~or of Finance ..... ' ••• Ill • . . ~ • · ' · EXHIBIT "B" · I .. ·. . COUNTY SANITATIO·N DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 . 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID Of"F·RAMP, SAN DIEGO f"REEWAY) B.J. Fibres 2701 South Birch Santa Ana, CA 92707 ·stroJECT :· Annual Use Charges Invoice No.: 75-2-1265 • Date: 2/28/75 April 15, 1975 TE LIE PHONES: ARCA COOC 714 • 540-2910 962-2411 • It has been brought to.my attention that subject past-due charges as itemized on the attached invoice remain unpaid. Please be advised that the Connection and Use ·Ordinance under which your permit is issued provides for penalties and delinquent charges commencing if the invoice remains unpaid after 45 days from issuance. Further, delinquent charges are deemed a violation of said ordinance, and each day any such charges remain delinquent is deemed a separate violation. Violatio11 of the ordinance is ·a misdemeanor, penalties ~or which are set forth in the ordinance. Pu~suant to the provisions of said ordinance; penalties and delinquent charges have been added to said invoice, and the amount now. owing the District is as follows: Original invoice amount Penalty at 10% Interest at 1/2% per month TOTAL AMOUNT NOW DUE AND PAYABLE $36,375.67 3,637 .. 57 $40,013.-24 Unless payment is received in full within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter, this matter will be turned over to the Districts' General Counsel for appropriate legal ction in accordance with provisions of the Connection. and Use dinance • . 111 I ·\I I J cc: C. Arthur.Nissen, General Counsel Accounting Department Industrial Waste DepArtment A/R File (2) • EXHIBIT "C" · .. TB.llHONE Pl4J 1400HO ,- FIBRES .. INC . IJll IOUTH lllCH mm • POST OFflCI IOX 20n • SANTA ANA. CALI~ '2111 ' f y April 18, 1975 J Wayne Sylvester County Sanitation Districts of Orange County .P. o. Box 8127 Fo~tain Valley, Ca 92708 Dear Mr Sylvestera Having received your correspondence regarding our . delinquent annual use charge and the subsequent inte~est charge, we feel you may not have all.the information. Until recently, we were in the process of discussing with John Thomas the validity of the statistical methods used to determine charges assessed our plant. in fact, i~ was not until Monday, April 14, that both Mr Thomas and our firm were satisfied. that the charges were completely fair. ·The :invoice has now ·gone back to our head office for payment. We are certainly sorry for the delay, but I am •• sure that John Thomas can confirm we had some ·legitimate ques~ions. WJKass oca Mr Larry_Hollingsworth Very t~ly yours, ~~ · WILLIAM J ARNEY Administrative Manager .......... ~. ~·~···· ........ .,. ........ .,. ....... ,,,.. ,... •Sl"l"lM ftA •W ., .... .. ·' •· • ·~ . . EXHIBIT "D" . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TELE .. HON t:a: . A"l:A CODE 714 540•2910 962•2411 19. D. BOX 8127, f'OUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID Of"F'·RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) . Attention: ·william J. Kearney Administrative Manager April 21, ' / Subject: Our Invoice No .•. 75-2-1265 · Dat.e.d February 28, 1975 Thank you for your letter of April 18 regarding subject invoice. Unfortunately, the connection and use· ordinance under which said invoice was issued does not provide relief from the 45-day ,payment period. It is my understanding that prior to the final due date, Mr. Thomas, at my urging, suggested that because you had raised a question regarding the billing, payment be made under protest in order to avoid late charges. Thereafter, any additional amount due or refundable could have been settled · ~ollowing a final determination of the charge. However, payment was not tendered; and, therefore, the charges .plus penalties as set forth in our lette or April·l5 are now due and payable. ~ . ckt cc: . ~ John Thomas # • ' ... EXHIBIT "E" co·uNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS . . OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFQRNIA P. o. BOX 8127. F'CUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF'CRNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID CF"F'·RAMP, SAN OIEGC.F'REEWAY) B. J. Fibres, Inc. 2701 South Birch Street Santa Ana, CA 92702 . : Attention: William J. Kearney Administrative Man~ger May 1, 1975 SUBJECT: Invoice Delinquency and Penalty Charges Invoice No.: 75-2-1265 Date: 2/2.8/7.5 TELE~HON 1:9: AREA CODE 714 • s•o-291 a 962·2'411 • .• This will acknowledge receipt of payment ·of the above invoice; however, because payment was not received within 45 days from the date of invoice as prescribed by the District's Connection and Use Ordinance under which your permit is issued, delinquency and penalty cparges due and payable pursuant to said ordinan~e are as follows: r Penalty @ 10% Interest·@ 1/2% per month .. TOTAL AMOUNT NOW DUE AND PAYABLE . $3,"637.57. 200.07. Uhles& payment is received in full within fifteen (15) days of the. date of this letter, this matter will be turned over to the District's General Counsel for appropriate legal acti 7 in accordance with the .prov.~sions of. the:' Connection and Use Ordi anc~~ . C'rNL :{"J, cc: • Wayne}fY!fv~ster ~1~cto1l/Jf Finance Thomas Woodruff, General Counsel Accounting Department Industrial Waste·Department AIR File • .. • -·l-.. '· • EXHIBIT "F-1" •· ...... TB.iiHONE (114J M04'50 ... FIBRES INC. 1711 SOUTH lllCH mEET • POST OFFICE IOX 20n • SANTA ANA. CALIF. '2707 May 7, 1975 Mr Donald Winn, Joint Chairman Board of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Ca 92708 Dear Mr Winn: At the request of John Thomas of your facility, we wish to bring to your attention our protest of a $J,639.57 late charge. Rather than review a rather lengthy episode, we have enclosed copies of all of our correspondence with the Districts. It is our feeling that much of this correspondence and subsequent late charges are completely unnecessary, especially in view of the fact that.John Thomas, by his own.admission, did not, as Mr Sylvester states, request us to pay under protest in order to avoid late charges. ·• On the contrary, Mr Thomas indicated· no urgency in paying the charge. In fact, he spent a great deal oi his own time drawing up many comparative schedules in order to make sure that we were both in agreement with the charges, which we do app~eciate. In view of the fact that we were not instructed to pay the charge in spite of protest, and the fact that we trusted that the people with whom we.were working would handle the matter appropriately, we feel the interest charge to be lL~fair. It is certainly not the matter of the amount of the interest charge, for as your records will show, we have already paid an amount in excess of $50,000. Ve submit this protest for your perusal, and hope that, . .Ir:. CONSHVH NATURAL l!SOUlCUM ••• HCLAMATION OP SECONDARY PIHES .. \ .. ~- EXHIBIT "F-2" Mr Donald Winn, May 7,. 1975, pg 2 after reviewing this case, your o£fice will take necessary action to relieve the th~eats of legal action as indicated by the enclosed correspondence. WJK: SS enc cc: ._, J Wayne Sylvester John Thomas . Very truly yours, / ~ .. ~, . ~42a·L~£</ WILL~ ~~y _,,/ Administrative Manager EXHIBIT "G" MEMORANDUM May 12, 1975 TO: Ray E. Lewis FROM: John D. Thomas SUBJECT: B. J. Fibres' Late Charges Early in 1974 subject company requested that they be invoiced semiannually for the Districts annual use charge. The Districts agreed to do this. After the Districts issued an invoice for the use charge for the second half of 1974, B. J. Fibres expressed some concern over the substantial increase in the annual use charge (1973 -use charge $25,214.75; 1974 - use charge $57,165.63). At that time I told B. J. Fibres that we would re-evaluate their discharge data, but I did not request that they pay their use charge under protest. Therefore, I recommend that the Districts waiver the subject late charges. JDT:mrw AGENDA ITEM #14 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY .._.,, 955 Workman Mill Road I Whittier, California 90601 Mailing Address: I P. 0. Box 4998, Whittier, California 90607 Telephone: (213) 699-7 411 I From Los Angeles (213) 685-5217 JOHN D. PARKHURST Chief Engineer and General Manager May 7, 1975 Mr. Winn Adams, Chairman State Water Resources Control Board 1015 Resources Building 1416 Ninth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Mr. Adams: On April 29, 1975 Mr. Donald Winn, Joint Chairman of the Sanitation Districts of Orange County, wrote a letter to you regarding the advisability of forming an advisory committee composed of local elected officials and a member of the State Water Resources Control Board for the purpose of discussing and reviewing proposed State regulations involv- ing policy matters affecting local entities. A copy of the letter was sent to the Sanitation Districts and it has been brought to my attention. The suggestion included in the Orange County letter is enthusiastically endorsed by the writer. As Chairman of the Board of Directors of Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles County, please be advised that I would like to participate in any future discussions directed toward the formation of such an advisory committee. Sanitation District No. 2 acts as the Administrative District.for all of the Sanitation Districts in Los Angeles County. The current thrust toward expediting the award of construction contracts by your Board and the Governor's staff would indicate that every effort should be made to adminis- tratively avoid conflicts between local° and state agencies which might delay implementation of the program. The Sanita- tion Districts are committed to full cooperation toward the early completion of engineering and award of major construc- tion co·ntracts which will help to allay the high unemployment in this area. If this program is to proceed in an orderly manner, all parties concerned should cooperate and fully participate in the formulation of new regulations which could affect the entire grants program. GG:cam cc: Donald Winn Yours very truly, ~.-&~~ Garth Gardner, Chairman Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles County cc: Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman General Manager General Counsel SUMMARY OF DISTRICTS' ACTIONS RE PROPOSED ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR USE OF DISTRICTS' SEWERAGE FACILITIES THE PURPOSE OF THIS HEARING, pursuant to provisions of Section 25131 of the Government Code, is to consider final changes to the proposed Ordinances Establishing Regulations for Use of Districts' Sewerage Facilities. Final adoption of each ordinance will be considered on May 29, 1975, at 7:30 p.m. in the Districts' Administrative Offices. THE PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSED SOURCE CONTROL ORDINANCE is to provide maximum public benefit from the use of sewerage facilities within the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, to improve the quality of waste- water being received for treatment by regulation of wastewater discharges, and to provide a method of procedures for establishing equitable use charges for District sewerage facilities as required by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Federal Environmental Protection Agency. ACTIONS TO DATE CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: In February, 1974, the Boards of Directors adopted Resolution No. 74-24 declaring their intent to adopt industrial waste discharge requirements pursuant to state and federal regulations and establishing an implementation schedule therefor. In November, 1974, the Districts' staff met with the Chambers of Commerce Industrial Waste Task Force Committee to review the proposed ordinances. During January and February, 1975, the draft ordinance was submitted to State Water Resources Control Board, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Boards of Directors. The Boards referred the ordinance back to the staff and General Counsel for revision. In February, the proposed requirements were also reviewed with representatives of the food processing, circuit board, and plating industries. In March, the revised draft ordinance was received, filed, and taken under advisement by the respective Boards. At that time, the Boards authorized staff to circulate the proposed ordinance and conduct informal hearings thereon. Notices were then placed in the following newspapers regarding informal public hearings: Huntington Beach Independent Orange County Evening News Anaheim-Fullerton-Beuna Park News La Mirada Lamplighter Times Daily Pilot The Register Anaheim Bulletin La Habra Star Progress Tustin News In March and April, the staff conducted informal open public hearings with the following groups: Chambers of Commerce Conservation Groups Local Public Agencies Class I Users Class I I Users Manufacturing Associations General Public In addition, meetings were held with specific permittees and Chambers of Commerce upon request. On April 9, 1974, a revised draft ordinance incorporating viable suggestions from the informal hearings was submitted to the Boards of Directors. The Boards declared their intent to introduce the Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of Districts' Sewerage Facilities at their regular meeting on May 14, 1975, and established May 29, 1975, at 7:30 p.m. in the Districts' Administrative Office as the time and place for adoption of said ordinance. On April 10, 1975, formal notice of hearing and copy of revised draft ordinance with comments were mailed to 540 interested parties, including the following: Districts' Directors News media Governing body of local sewering agencies within the Districts Staff of sewering agencies within the Districts Conservation groups and other agencies Existing District permittees Chambers of Commerce Industrial and Manufacturing Associations Libraries within the Districts On May 9, 1975, the final draft of the proposed ordinances were mailed to Directors for their consideration tonight. -2- NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY 'Where Design Ernls and Quality Begins" May 1 5 , 1 975 ORANGE COUNTY SANITAT I ON DISTRICT ·P . 0 . Box 8 12 7 Fountain Vall ey, Cal U:ornia 92708 Attn: John D. T h omas Subj: Waste Water Dis c h arge Ordinance Articl~ 4 , Section 402 D ear M r. Thomas : During the meeting of May 1 4 , at your facility , a question was raised by a Mr . B ill Snyder of Embee Plating i n regard to "Excess Capac i ty Dis charge 11 covered i n th e proposed ordin a nce . M r. Ray Lewis, a member of the Sanitatfon District staff answered Mr . Snyder 's question thus : Although Arlicle 4 has been in existance sinc e 1 97 0, it has not be en enforced, but was there to be u sed if needed . Mr . Lewis gave an exampl e: 11 1£ a n ew Industry built a large facility that woul d r equ ire a l arger sewer to be i nstalled to accomodate their excess w.ater , then the ordinance would be used to pay f or the larger sewer ." Being acknowledged by the General M a nager , I a sked Mr . Lewis the following qu estion:· "If a company has occupied their present facilities for 3 to 4 years , and has not been char ged for excess capacity, can we assume that t he capacity of the existing sewer is of suffident size t o h a ndle the flow , and therefore wo uld not expect to be charged ~xcess capac i ty? · Mr . Lewis 1 answer to my question was yes . If we have not b een charged, h e sees no reason why \Ve should be c h arged in th e fut u re . One more point I would l ike to br ing to t h e Distr ict 1 s attention, and that i s the $35 0 . 00 per 1000 g allon per day penalty. This is outrageous . National Technology has 3 p l ants . O n e p l a nt in 1 974 wor k i n g 2 shi fts u sed 38 , 100, 000 gallons . This divided by 2 60 days equals 1 46 , 538 gallons per day . The other two plants u sed 56 , 538 and 36 , 1 54 gallons respect- fully . To our type of Industry this is a reaso'nabl e use . How would you apply the excess capac i ty of $~5 0. 00 per 1 000 gallons to Nation_al I wish to have this l etter n oted and served as a documen t in regard to my question a nd. Mr . Lewis 1 s answer for future reference . V~r '~ru·l~'d!rs;,J -7, ·-:; u -?-/? -· T . \.. C:l r k 220 W ES T C ENTRAL AVEN UE I SA NTA ANA, CALIFOR NIA 92707 ·/ TELE X 655373 I 71 4 5<16-6 186 ~ N&+le IS d L-L 0 __,() . ;-::::: v =\.-61~~~--_. ----"""------'7/-~MJ ~J.~ U t/--- Lfvr-Qr j? ~c::£J~/V1 ~j. {5'c5 tJ ~c;,2/ /Yi/;,~ge.h. ___ _ -------- NAME ~ed Reynolds ~Don Perkins ..........-Quinn Rogers Bob Clark Frank Elwell Walker Downs Bill Snyder Ralph Williams Beau Clewens Ronald Randal 1 Kris Shah George L'Africain Ordinance Meeting Held May 29, 1975, 7:30 p.m . COMPANY Chapman, Phillips, Brandt, Reddick ITr/CANNON .ELECfRIC Rogers Plating National Technology Shur Plate Corp. Anodyne, Inc. Embee Plating Anodyne !Ne. Beau Clewens & Assoc. General Automation, Inc. Litronics Industries Litronics Industries \'. ,-~ \v'\i: {l) \} 1\ ··.t Section 509, Page 36 -Add Saltarelli's suggestion that in the event of any state or local declared emergency, fees or fines can be waived. ~· (2) ( 3) (4) Section 510, Page 36 -Re old Article VIII of existing ordinance relative to local agency exemptions Section 302.1, Pa~e 14 -Re Name and Type of employees. Rather than get into pro lem of trying to define that, should delete and add as follows: Paragraph 4.2 -Number of employees and average hours of work per employee. Section 506, Page 35 -Re appeals, point was raised relative to timing by Mr. Elwell. See line 7 & 8. Would recommend that the General Manager shall render his decision on requests for reconsideration to the user, permit applicant or permit holder, in writing, within 15 days of the receipt of the request. (S) Section 302.21, Page 20 -Re accidental discharge, suggested it will be defined to secure the discharges and prevent them from entering the system in accordance with acceptable engineering methods. (6) Section 303.5 -McKnew suggested re "new owner" that this does not having any significant legal meaning except as referring to single owner as opposed to corporation. Don't know if we need to have this requirement re new owner. Main concern is about new premises or different operation. Suggested that Woodruff think about this item and change wording later . \, .'\~·. \J . {" ·,\,~-;'-"'I I \ .. \. ~ \, \\l \ .~- uirec tor Jess e Da vis SOZ l ~c Co mte r Re ad ~uena Park , CA Y0 ~20 S uoj~~t; r~fo r 14 , 1 :1 7 5 Ag<.ni<\a i .tem No. 13 re contract with J ~a n L(!dows , J.ba A.l .:i rt Co;z.p a ny Pu rs uan t t a yo •r Tequcs t, enclos ed is n c ~~Y of t he r o ll call vot e on t he mo tion tn con ti nue s ub ject c on tra ct u~t \1 J une 1 0 , 1 ~7 5 . which said motion failed to pass . Jl\'S :rb Enclosure J. Wayne Sylvester Secretary of t h e Bo a r d of Directors MEETING DATE May 14 , 1 975 TIME 7:30 p.m . DISTRICTS 1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ,7 .& 1 1 DISTRICT 1 (DIEDRICH)· ••.• BATTIN-. • . • J · tJ (EVANS) • • · · • • • GARTHE· •••. ~ --~ -- ( RIMA . • . • . • ~1 --N -- SHARP) •••••.•• SALTARELLI. __ ~ == DISTRICT 2 !EWING)········ CHAPUT····· _../ _ __&. -- LYONS) • • • · • · • ·CALLAHAN· • • _..; --"---~DR I CH)···· ·CLARK······ _I _--~ __ l:il'\RTtlE) • · • • • • ·EVANS . • • • • • _J ---1L -- THOM)········· KAYWOOD ···· _..; _ _j_ __ (FoxJ ••••••.•.• MAC KA IN ••• _; _ _Ji_ -- PERRY· • · • • • -~-__ 111 __ ~SVALSTAD)· ····SCOTT······ 0-' ~ PEREZ)· • • · • • • • ~P1PL C"' • • • · 7' ' == DUNN~)······· ·WINN·······_,_ __ (WARD)·········~······ ,/· ----1L (GRAHAM) • • • • • • ·YOUNG· • • • • • -./-1f ------- DISTRICT 3 (MAC KAIN)···· ·FOX·· • • • • • • __:!._ ---A. --../ I . · AMO········ ------ (COLLINS).···· ·BYRNE···· •. _./_ j__ -- (HOMRI GHAUSEN) ·COX········ _/ __ ,I_ -- CULVER·····+_,/_ -- !G.R I FF j N) · • • • • I)A'<}rs.,. • • •· • · --v SONJU) ······FRAN KIEWICH _../_ ---y--== GARTHE) • • • • • ··EVANS · · · ,/ _tJ_ -- !NEVI l-) • • • • • • • ·GRAHAM· · · --r _tL -- THOM) • • • • • • • • • KAYWOOD · · • · _./ __ ,I __ _ BLAC t<MAN)·····MC KNEW····_../ _ __t!._ __ WOOD)··· · • • ···WARD • • • • • • · _./ _ _.d_ __ DIEDRICti) ·····SCHMIT····· fJJ fL !STANTON)· • • · · ~· · • -;;-_L_ - ARB I SO) • • • • • • ·WE I SHAU PT· • --y-__j__ -- SH I PLEY) •..• ··GIBBS · ·• • • ~ ~ == ,, ( YCKOFF) •.•. ·MC INNIS· ... / tJ I (DIEDRICH)··· ··RILEY······~~== ROGERS· · · • · _l:::__ _L __ DISTRICT 6 RIMA ....... _../ _ _i (DIEDRICH).··. ·BATTIN· .... _.; ___ •I == (MC J.NN IS) ••••• STORE .••••• _v _ ___!L __ DISTRICT 7 SHARP)······· ·SALTARELLI ·~ __hl_ -- ANTHONY)· • • • • ·BURTON · · · • · _../_ ---1L -- DI EDRlCH) ·····CLARK ······ -"-_i -- MC INNI S )···· ·DOSTAL·····_,; _ ___.!!_ -- EVAN S ) · • • • • • · GARTHE • · · • .• ~ __..&. -- GLOCKNER · ·~_:!_ ~ -- (TEMPLE) • • · • · • ·JACKMAN· • •· ~ __::[_ _'I_ -- D J.S..T R I CT 11 !G u rn?) · · · · · ···DUKE· • ·r: • •• ~ _:J_ __ WI EDER ) -······GIBBS· .}lk.... v 'I DI EDRICH)·····SCHMIT····· a, ~ == DISTRICT '·g · MITCHELL··; ------ (JOHNSON)······ HOLM······ (DIEDRICH) ••• ··RILEY······======== 5/14/75 JOINT BOARDS (DUNNE) •.••.•.• WINN....... v' ~--AMO ...•.... DI EDR I C~) • • · • ·BATTIN • • • . • -,--- ANTHONY • •• ••• BURTON ••••. -v--- COLL I ~S .•••• ·.BYRNE • • • • . . --r -- LYONS .•• • • · •• CALLAHAN. • • -;--- EWING ... · . · .. CHAPUT. . . . . -./--- DIEDRICH)· ····CLARK •••••• -.;--- HOMR I GHAUSEN) .cox ••••••.• --../ -- CULVER. • • • . -,--- GRIFFIN)····· ·DAVIS· •.••• -/--- MC INNIS)···· ·DOSTAL...... .; 'i-f. /t(\11- GIBBSJ •.•.•.•. DUKE •.••..• -J- GARTHE) ·······EVANS •••••. ---- MAC _-·Ktl N) • • • ·.FOX ••••••.• -/--- SONJU • • • · • • ·FRAN KIEWICH ----v' -- EVANS · · • • • · · ·GARTHE · •••• -..;--- s-llPLEY/WIEDER)GIBBS •.•••• -./--- GLOCKNER··. -...t --- NEVIL)······· ·GRAHAM · .... -..;--- TEMPl-E) ·······JACKMAN •••• -.;--- THOM)···· · · ···KAYWOOD ••.. -1 --- FOX)········· ·MAC KAIN •.. -,--- RYCOFF) ·······MC INNIS···-/--- BLACKMAN)···· ·MC KNEW •••• -1 --- PERRY· .•.•. --r--- (DIEDRICH)···· ·RILEY· .•... -./--- RI MA .....•. _/_"-__ ROGERS ....• -,V-~ wooD) ••••.•.. ·WARD .••.••• --;- SHARP) .• ······SALTARELLI·~~ DIEDRICHi·····SCHMIT .••.. ___[e_ ~ SVALSTAD ••••. SCOTT ...... ---;---'· MC INNIS · • • • ·STORE. • • • • • -" -~ STANTON) ••..•. £¥At.S.i-Air. .. -v -~./ iPEREZ) •••.•.•. ~E ••. (----;:;;------r-v' ARB.J so) ••....• WE I SHAUPT. • J ~ IE_ WARD) ········WOOD · .••• ~ (GRAHAM)······ ·YOUNG······ \_. o/ -- OTHERS ~~~, ~{j' HARPER SYLVESTER LEWI S CLARKE TAYLOR BROWN ~· l l -~ J ~f V..V WOODRUFF b/ I EWING HOHENER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KE NN EY LYNCH MADDOX MARTIN SON PIERSALL STEVENS .. ·/ .··/·r~ _.._ __________________ . MEET ING DATE May 14, 1975 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS l,2,3,5,6,7 .& 11 DISTRICT 1 1=k-\3_ (DIEDRICH).· •• -BATTIN· •• ··~~ -- (EVANS) • • • • • • • E· • • • • ~ ----= --RI A ••••• • ~--= __ (SHARP) •••••••• S ARELLI· V __ -__ DISTRICT 2 ~ING)········ • • • • · ~-= -- L fONS) • • • • • • ·CALLAHAN· • ~ ±.__ -- DIEDRICH) • • • · • C • • • • • • ~ ----=.. -- GARTJJ E) ·······EVANS . • • • • • ~ ---= -- THO~)········· KAYWOOD···· ~ ...±:__ -- FOX)········· ·MAC KAIN···~ ----- PERRY· • • • • • '-""""" ------=. -- !SVALSTAD) ·····SCOTT······ ~ 0---- PEREZ)· • • • • • • • "fEf\PLE • • • • • ~ ...±___ -- DUNNE)······· ·WINN······· ~. --= -- WARD)· • • • • • • • • ~· • • • • • • ~ --= -- GRAHAM)······ ·YOUNG······~.±__ -- DISTRICT 3 (MAC KAIN)····· FOX········ __JL: ~ -- . AMO········ ~ _±___ --(COLLINS).···~~······~~ --(HOMRIGHAUSEN~· • · • • • ~ _:L_ -- CUL VER· • • • • ~ ...:L_ --~GR I FF JN) • • • • • BA¥ I S • • • • • • ~ _L._ -- S ONJ U) • • • • • ·FRANKIEWICH ~ ..±__ -- .GARTHE) ·······EVANS • · • • • ~ --= -~NEV I LJ • · · • • • • ·GRAHAM· • • • • ---= -- THOM) • • • • • • • • • KAYWOOD· • • • ~ ~ -- BLAC l<MAN) • • • • ·MC KNEW· • • • ~ --= -- !WOOD)········ ·WARD······· ~ --= -- DI EDRICtf) ·····SCHMIT·····~~ -- STANTON) • • • • • • S¥AL8TAB • • • __k:_ ...±.__ -- ARB I SO)······ ·WEISHAUPT·· ~ _±__ --SHIPLEY)~·· ·~!BBS • · • • • ~ _+ __ _ DISTRICT 5 ~ (RYCKOFF) • • • • ·~ I Nt:I J.S) • · ·--k::'.. --= -·- (DIEDRICH) • • • • • I LEY· • • · • • __k:::::: ..±_ -- ROGERS····· 0-~ -- DISTRICT 6 RIMA....... V --= -- (DIEDRICH) •••• !AIIB· .... v __=:. - (MC INNIS) ••• -~~TOR_ • • • • • ~--= -- DISTRICT 7 SHARP)······· ·SALTARELLI·~--= -- ANTHONY)····· ·BURTON····· ~--= -- DIEDRICH)····· CLARK······ ~ --=: -- MC INNIS)··· ·~HA~···· V --= - EVANS) · • · • • ·RTHk· • • • ...,... -= -- GLOCKNER· • • ~ -= -- (-....,PLE) ·······JACKMAN···· ~ ±__ -- DISTRICT 11 ~GIBBS)······· ·DUKE·~~ ~ _±__ -- WI EDER) -······GIBBS· • • • • • V ..±__ --DIEDRICH)····~···· a_, ~ -- DI STR I CT '· 8 MITCHELL· • • (JOHNSON)······HOLM •••••• (DIEDRICH)·····RILEY······ 5/14/75 JOINT BOARDS (DUNNE).······ .WINN ••••••• ~ __ AMO.... • • • • .........-__ DIEDRIC~) ••••• BATTIN ••••• ~ --I ANTHONY~.··· •• BURTON ••••• ~ __ COLLI ~S ••••• ·.BYRNE •••••• __.!L_ __ LYONS~ ••••• • •• CALLAHAN ••• ~ __ EWING •• ). ····.CHAPUT ••••• ~ __ D I ED R I CH • • • • • CLARK • • • • • • ~ __ HOMRIGHAUSEN) .cox ........ ~ __ ) CULVER····· ~ __ GR I F F I N • • • • • • DA\' I 5 • • • • • • __.JL_ ,. MC INNIS)···· ·DOSTAL··· ••• ~ as-81~ GIBBS) ••••• •• -DUKE ••••••• ~ __ : GARTHE) • j · · · · ·EVANS •••••• --1,L. __ MAC ·KtIN ·····FOX· ••••••• ~ __ SONJU • • • • • • ·F.RANKIEWICH ~ __ EVANS ········GARTHE····· ~ S1IPLEY/WIEDER)GIBBS· ••••• _lL:.. == GLOCKNER··· v NEVIL))········GRAHAM····· ~ == TEMPYE ·······JACKMAN···· T ~--HO~ ·········KAYWOOD···· ~-FOX ··········MAC KAIN··· ) ~--RYCOFF ·······MC INNIS··· ) ~--BLACKMAN ·····MC KNEW···· v __ PERRY·· • • • • v (DIEDRICH)·····RILEY······ ~ == RIMA·.····· ~ __ ROGERS. • • • . a_, WOOD) • • • • • • • • ·WARD • • • • • • • V == SHARP) •••••••• SALTARELLI· DIEDRICH~·····SCHMIT ••••• SVALSTAD ·····SCOTT······ MC INNIS ·····STORE······ STANTON) •••••• £VALSTAB··· Z) • • • • • • • • TEP1PLE • • • • • ~------ (1...--- ~ -- ~- ~--o) ....... wEISHAUPT·· -·······~~ .••••• ---- (GRAHAM)·······YOUNG······ ~ -- OTHERS HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS CLARKE TAYLOR BROWN WOODRUFF EWING HOHENER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVENS MEETING DATE May 14, 1975 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 DISTRICT 1 ~'~ JOINT BOARDS (DIEDRICH) •• •• -BATTIN ••••• ---1L. __ - (EVANS) • • • • • • • GARTHE· ••• • -----1L __ -- RIMA •••••• ~ ___ _ (SHARP) •••••••• SALTARELLI· ___.hl ___ _ DISTRICT 2 ~NG)··· • • • ··CHAPUT· • • • • ____)l_ -- LI JNS) ••.••••• CALLAHAN ••• .::f__ ---- DIEDRICH)···· ·CLARK······ __ N ---- GARTHE) ·······EVANS . • • • • • _.ii ----THO~)· • • • • • • • • KAYWOOD· • • • _j__ ---- FOX)········· ·MAC KAIN··· __ N ---- PERRY······ __N_ ___ _ !SVALSTAD)· ····SCOTT······~--- PEREZ)· • • • • • • • KP1PLE · · · • · _j__ ----DUNN~)··· • • • • ·WINN· • • • • • • ---tL ___ _ WARD) • • • • • • • • • weeB · • • · · · • __..tJ.. ___ _ GRAHAM)·· • • • • ·YOUNG· • • • • • -::/_ ___ _ DISTRICT 3 (MAC KAIN)····· FOX····· ••• ~ ---- AMO· • • • • • • • _j__ ---- (COLL INS)····· ·BYRNE······ _j__ ---- (HOMR I GHAUSEN) ·COX· • • • • • • • ::/____ ---- CUL VER· • • • • .::/___ ---- GR I FF JN) • • • • • !8A\'I S • • • • · • :f__ ---- SONJU) • • • • • ·FRANKIEWICH _j__ ---- GARTHJ:) ·······EVANS • • • • • ~ ---- NEVI l-J • • • • • • • ·GRAHAM· • • • • ----1J. ---- THOM) • • • • • • • • • KAYWOOD· • • • :L.:_ ---- B LACt<MAN) ·····MC KNEW···· ~ ---- WOOD)········ ·WARD··· · • • • ~ ___ _ DIEDRICti) ·····SCHMIT····· ~,.,x -- STANTON)····· ·S't'ALSTAB· • • .:i__ ---- ARB I SO)······ ·WE I SHAU PT·· .:i__ --__ SH I PLEY) • • • • • • '2I ii~ • • • • • _::/..-___ _ DISTRICT 5 (RYCKOFF)· ·····MC INNIS···-~ ---·- (DIEDRICH)···· ·RILEY······~ ----ROGERS·····~ __ DISTRICT 6 RIMA ••••... __li ----· - (DIEDRICH) •••• ·BATTIN .•.•• __}L ---- (MC INNIS) ••••• STORE •••••. __N_ --__ DISTRICT 7 SHARP)········SALTARELLI· ANTHONY) · • • • • ·BURTON· • • • • DIEDRICH)·····CLARK······ MC INNIS) .••• ·DOSTAL····· EVANS) ·······GARTHE· •·• • GLOCKNER··· (T,,..._,LE)·······JACKMAN···· DISTRICT 11 ___li. ---- ~ ----~----_N ____ _ ~--- N _j__ == == ~GIBBS)).······ ·DUKE······· _j__ ---- WIEDER -······GIBBS······ _j___ _ -- DIEDRICH)···· ·SCHMIT····· ~--__ 5/14/75 (DUNNE).····· •• w INN ••••••. ___ _ AMO •••••••. DIEDRIC~) ••••• BATTIN ••••• == == ANTHONY • • •••• BURTON ••••. COLLI ~S ••••• ·.BYRNE •••••• ---- LYONS •••••••• CALLAHAN ••• ==== EWING •••••••• CHAPUT •••••. DIEDRICH)····. CLARK •••••• ---- HOMRI GHAUSEN). COX •••••••• --------CULVER····· !GRIFFIN)····· ·DAVIS •••••• ---- MC INNIS)···· ·DOSTAL •.•••• ---- GIBBS) ••• · ••• ·DUKE ••••••• ---- GARTHE) ·······EVANS •••••• ---- !MAC K~IN)·····FOX········ ------ SONJU) • • • • • • ·FRANKi EWI CH ---- EVANS 1 • • • • • • • • GARTHE .•••• ------ S1 IPLEY /WI EDER)G IBBS • ••••. ---- GLOCKNER. . . ---- NEV IL) • • • • • • • ·GRAHAM. • • • • ---- TEMPl,..E) • • • • • ··JACKMAN •••. ---- THO~) • • • • • • • • ·KAYWOOD. • • • ---- FOX)·········· MAC KAIN ••. ---- RY CO FF) • • • • • • ·MC INNIS· • · ---- BLACKMAN)···· ·MC KNEW •••. ---- PERRY······ ---- (DIEDRICH)···· ·RILEY· ••••• ---- RIMA ••••••• ---- ROGERS ••..• ---- WOOD) · • • • · • · . -WARD • • . . . • . ---- SHARP) · • ·····.SALTARELLI. ----DIEDRICH~ ••••• SCHMIT .•••• ---- SVALSTAD ••• •. SCOTT •••••• ---- MC INNIS ·····STORE· ••••. ---- STANTON)····· ·SVALSTAD· •• ----~PEREZ) • • • • • • • ·TEMPLE· •·• · · ---- ARB I so) ....... WE I SHAU PT .• ---- WARD) • • • • • • • ·WOOD • • · · · ---- (GRAHAM) • • • • • • ·YOUNG·· · · · · ---- OTHERS HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS CLARKE TAYLOR BROWN WOODRUFF EWING HOHENER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVENS MAY 14, 1975 Joint Meeting ~) Election of Chairmen DISTRICT 1 -Rima nominated; nominations closed DISTRICT 2 -(Graham nominated but not an active member of Dist. 2) Callahan nominated; nominations closed DISTRICT 3 -Cox nominated, nominations closed DISTRICT 5 -Mcinnis nominated; nominations closed DISTRICT 6 -Store nominated; nominations closed DISTRICT 7 -Garthe nominated; nominations closed DISTRICT 11 -Schmit nominated; nominations closed (7a) Report of Joint Chairman Announced that Mr. Harper was elected Vice President of AMSA. Advised that staff is preparing a small brochure to be distributed to Directors and other interested parties. Will include such things as organization, budget, personnel, flow, projects under construction and proposed, plus capacities. Also will have an explanation of the most commonly used terms or abbreviations used. Brochure will be ready very shortly. Stated that all the Directors received a copy of his letter to W.W. Adams asking for consideration of the formation of a Statewide committee of locally-elected officials representing the Tri-Tac organizations for the purpose of reviewing proposed regulations in- volving policy matters affecting local entities. Directors also received a letter from Mr. Gardner, Chairman of L.A. County Sanitation Districts, supporting formation of a committee like this. Advised that he met with Executive Committee prior to this meeting and came up with suggested composition of this conunittee. Mr. Harper and he will submit this to Mr. Adams next Tuesday in Sacramento. Hopes to get a committee of elected officials that is functioning and that would represent the various organizations that would be able to have access to the SWRCB and EPA officials. Hopefully, will include one or more members of SWRCB and EPA, two members from County Supervisors Association, two members from League of California Cities, two members from CWPCA and two members from CASA. Could be some variation in that. Hope to be distributed throughout the State. Advised that he had an inquiry from Supv. Schimit's office indicating he hoped this committee would be kept to a small number so would be effective. Is strictly in formative stage now. Called Executive Committee meeting for 5:30 p.m., May 29, 1975, prior to Adjourned Joint Meeting at 7:30 p.m. (7b) Report of General Manager FAH stated he appeared before the State Assembly Committee re AB 1463 (?) restrictions. Didn't fare too well in conunittee. Some question of legality in State legislature in passing lawsthat are actually contrary to Proposition 20 or State Constitution amendment. Afterwards was able to talk to some of the Committee staff and felt that from comments made by Committee, they are cognizant of problems we have been having since Coastal Commission had been formed. Felt resolution by State legislature could do same thing. Re: Executive Committee meeting on 29th, will be primarily to consider Joint Operating and Joint construction budget which will be presented to Board. Is one of the toughest budgets in this galloping inflation. $5 million budget proposed. Re State proposed conditions restricting sewer connections, those hearings were postponed indefinitely but State appointed a committee made up of gentlemen from Environmental Quality Office and State Board staff and Air Resources Board staff to visit each of these air mainten- ance areas. May be coming in with same requirements they they postponed the hearings on. Will be meeting with them on the 28th re line that goes up Santa Ana Canyon. Chairman Winn then asked REL to comment briefly on JPL process. Ray reported that we have had some of our material produced here taken to Springfield, Ohio, and New Jersey, where the material was tested to determine pyrolosis and the activation of this sewage-carbon mixture. Have had several meetings the last couple weeks with EPA and State. Program receiving a lot of enthusiasm. Met last Friday with two members of EPA in Washington. Have scheduled meeting next Monday, 19th, with representatives of State and EPA and this will be the time where a decision has to be made to allocate the funds to receive for construction. Our concerns are the cost and the ash content of the product itself. The grant application went in one year ago. Estimated $1.6 million then. Based upon recent quotes, cost will be approximately $2 million. Still within the total budget of $3~ million. We should have a response from the State and EPA to report to you on the 29th. (7c) Report of General Counsel Woodruff commented that it had been an iteresting first 30 days. Has spent considerable time with staff and Mr. Nissen. Appears to be a very efficient transfer. Stated there is no particular outstanding item of litigation except employee AFL-CIO recognition. That matter has been referred to Special Labor Counsel in LA. Woodruff met with with them and the matter is set for preliminary hearing on May 22nd. Will report on result at May 29th meeting. One item that should be brought to Boards' attention--District 3 item on agenda. Saturday night had street cave-in at Westminster and Goldenwest. City of Westminster, Tutor & Saliba and Sully-Miller had serious conference as to who was responsible. Was City's water line that broke because of way installed. Had meeting Monday. Major problem is that the street and that intersection has been tied up for many months. Issues were clouded; so many people involved7-contractors, subcontractors, etc. Basically resolved with the concurrence of our contractors and City of Westminster that District would issue a change order for reconstruction of the street. Repairs have been made completly. City has held Districts free and harmless and our contractors as harmless and we are holding them harmless too. We are picking up street expenses and everybody else picking up their own expenses also. (10) CONSENT CALENDAR items removed: ~ (a) Requested to be deleted by contractor. (d) Questioned whether stop notices were from subcontractors or suppliers of equipment on project. Almo supplied cable & Atlas supplied labor. Dispute on payment is between prime & subcontractors. -2- {g) Questioned whether $500,000 was combined fees of five agencies. FAH said funds are based on basis of flows of District. We pay about 15%. Two major contributors are City of LA and LA County Sanitation Districts. We are paying $79,000 of the $500,000. In effect until 1979. Said if they wish to up this, have to come back to sponsoring agencies for increase. EPA is asking them to do more and more work. Hopinq to shift burden to EPA in the future. {dd) Director said he didn't understand why we are renting property from railroad at $500 per month. REL answered this is Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer job. There is not sufficient right of way or operating room within public right of way. City of Tustin is in process of acquiring old Southern Pacific right of way adjacent to Newport Avenue. To provide an area for contractor to work in, we are obligated to rent this property since it is still under ownership of railroad during construction period. Worked with Southern Pacific and was predicated on rentals in the area. In fact, lower than other properties. {hh) Questioned backdating of agreement. FAH explained we have been negotiating for some time. Their funding was in 1973-74 and someone in Sacramento requires the contract date to be in that fiscal year. Woodruff added that we are actually ratifying contract and see no problem. Motion was then made and seconded to approve items removed from consent calendar. {13a) Jeanne Eddows contract WNC reported re sludge contract. Reviewedhistory of taking proposals for sale of sludge, etc. Had one problem that arose that they didn't have proper insurance but wasn't required in that amount so asked Board last month to lower the amount. Said it was his opinion that they haven't fulfilled nor do they have the capabilities of filling the contract. Mr. Harper asked him to give them a list of things tha~ should be done immediately. Said in his opinion, it wasn't done. We have generated a great deal of sludge on the ground of Treatment Plant No. 2 and many complaints re odor & flies. Did try to guide them along to get orderly processing of the solids. He did ask them "Is this your best effort?" and they said yes. Not acceptable; appears to be inadequate. Have bent over backwards to be fair. Appeared that they were willing and eager but didn't have capabilities or equipment to proceed with the job. Alart Company representatives, Jeanne Eddows & Norman Card then introduced. Said they would like to suggest that this be dropped until June 11th meeting. Said theyagreed to comply with directive and made arrangements for more equipment. Perez asked what the purpose would be in continuing this matter? Asked, Would you come forth with information that would be contrary? Jeanne answered that basis of contract was long-range plans. They are developing and plan to install a dryer at no cost to Districts. Perez then asked if the conditions under which she agreed to the contract were unreasonable. She said no, she wasn't saying that. This is an unprecendented year; more rainfall this year. Perez then asked if we give them until June meeting, what do they hope to bring to them. She answered they hope to bring sludge out by then. -3- She added that Bill wants sludge moved by June 10. No problem in north bed. McKnew mentioned a~~'-;,R of fraud in notice of May 6th, and failure of consideration and loss of capability to perform by reason of altered financial circumstances. Jeann.e stated financial circumstances are personal. Carl (ane, Attorney for Alart, added that the notice was directed to time contract was entered into. Were no financial problems then. Since that time is one past due obligation of $1500. No other problems. Said he thinks the County assumed they were going to use ~.?f~~ operation but weren't. Now they are going to do it. Discussion re equipment & ability to perform. Woodruff stated that if Directors see fit to continue this, Districts have taken position that contract is rescinded and Alart has been ordered off property. If contract is granted 15 or 30 day extension, one requirement we might want is to propose some sort of security. Districts have incurred $3,000 of our own expenses by required activity of staff as a result of their failure. Jackman asked if they take no action, then recission is in effect. Only with continuance motion would contract be in effect for another 30 days. Woodruff stated that if Directors see fit to take no action, would like a motion to ratify Notice of Recission. FAH reiterated what actions were listed on agenda and reviewed some of the meetings with Alart Company. Read list of priorities and stated that if the Alart Company could convince Directors that they can do those things, then he would reconunend continuance so that they can proceed to the 10th. Winn said they really have to convince FAH & WNC that this can be done. FAH stated that as sincere as they have been the last few days, he was not personally convinced. · WNC added that he was afraid that they haven't convinced him that they have the capability of continuing. More discussion re Districts doing the work or allowing them more time to show their capabilities. Questioned how much it would cost the Districts to do the work themselves and how long it would take to get a new contract. ($300 per day for as much as 60 days). Also questioned who we .. were actually doing business with--Alart Company. Woodruff stated that if they do go forward, he would very strongly reconunend that they not be allowed to enter onto the property until they execute a new document which he could approve where they acknowledge the recission and that we do not waive our rights under the existing recission. Cox asked if we could add, if we grant them an extension, that they agree that the current recission is acceptable to them without a lawsuit. Cox then MOVED that condition. Motion was seconded. /Restated MOTION: (1) Grant Alart Company an extension of a maximum of 30 days (or until June mtg.) if they will agree, in writing, and agreement to be approved by our attorney that we do not waive any rights under 1 the recission that has been served on them; (2) They will comply to ! the letter with all items set forth in WNC's memo of May 13th; (3) They ·)agree that the grounds for the recission are valid and will terminate the contract if they do not perform as set forth in this agreement. If they do not want to accept those terms, we will continue recission. Woodruff advised that the extension be to the June 11th mtg. rather than 30 days. -4- Woodruff then suggested that we ask Alart if they would agree to that. Attorneynr Alart Company responded to question and said Point No. 1 is acceptable concerning Districts reserving all rights under contract and as to to the recission. Point No. 2 agreeable that they would perform in accordance with requirements on that sheet. Point No. 3 hard to live with. Dispute over grounds in that Notice of Recission are valid. Feel that if they agree that rights of Districts to recission are maintained, would be sufficient. Said number 3 would be unnecessary. Woodruff then stated that Mr. Cox' motion was pretty clear.and thought Directors understood. If they want extension, we are giving them 30 days. {actually 27 days) but if they can't perform in that time, don't want to get engaged in another legal dispute. Jeanne Eddows stated she felt wording in Notice was offensive. Woodruff indicated the language could be changed. Saltarelli then spoke against motion of Cox. Said he sat in on original pr9posals. Don'-t think we have a serious problem. Staff is doing what is necessary to resolve. Isn't going to make us fare any better on long-range problem. Would vote against this motion. Think they should support staff to rescind contract and resolve problem in the future. More discussion re staff's basis for recission. FAH advised there are two separate considerations--cleaning of the sludge beds where we put the digester overflows; and so that it does not go to the ocean which would violate our NPDES permit. We accumulate about 100 yards per day of wet sludge that is spread on the ground. Dostal referred to Cox motion which included May 13, 1975 memo which required action by June 30th and his motion indicates action by June 10th. Wanted to be sure motion is clear on that. Woodruff then stated that we are dealing with Alart Company. The form of the motion is to be that contractor, Jeanne Eddows, be allowed to enter the property for purpose of performing and attempting compliance with terms of their contract of February 20th for period of time not to exceed June 10, 1975, subject to four conditions: (1) New written understanding be executed before they enter, subject to his {General Counsel) approval. (2) Agrees that District does not waive any of its legal rights under Notice of Recission served. (3) They will comply with all terms and instructions of memorandum to FAH, changing No. 5 by deleting clause that refers to June 30th; and deleting No. 7 clause. (4) Accept and acknowledge, in writing, that the determination of the Board of Directors at June 11th meeting will be binding. That they will waive any rights of further enforcement of that agreement. Roll Call Vote on motion. Four Districts against motion; Two Districts in favor; District 5--no action{tied). Motion failed. Saltarelli then moved the staff's recommendation--Items 13(b) ,(c)&(d). Motion seconded and carried by voice vote. -5- (15) Proposed Ordinances (a) Opened hearing 9:07 p.m. (b) JWS reported (c) Deferred until after comments (item (d) (d) (1) JWS read list of written comments received. Added letter just received at meeting from Case-Swayne. (2) SEE tape of recorded public hearing comments. (f) Closed public hearing 10:43 p.m. REL summarized and more discussion by Directors. (c) Moved, seconded and carried for each District. (g) Chair declared intent to adopt respective ordinances at adjourned meeting to be hald May 29, 1975, at 7:30 p.m. in the Districts' administrative office (SEE attached list of changes to be included in ordinances) (16) Re SCAG as planning element for "Section 208" areawide planning area FAH reported on telephone discussion with Ray Remy, Executive Director of Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) . He said they ' certainly support our position but in the event that EPA and State tell us that something should be done here, they would like to be named as planning agency. FAH said he told Mr. Remy he would bring this to the Board's attention. If Board wishes to take this position, would relay this to State Board tom©rrow. Perry stated that Orange County Division of League of Cities unanimously adopted from three alternatives that we oppose State as the designated agency and that the local governments be recognized instead. Didn't define local but p~esume cities and county. SCAG coming in as designated agency was not discussed. Should we not take action, would assume that State would have the power to be the designee. Winn then asked Directors if they care to take any further action on this item and was answered, no. -6- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS A PROPOSED ORDINANCE ESTABLlSJIING REGULATIONS FOR THE USE OF DISTRICTS' SEWERAGE FACILITIES of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 I 0844 F.LLI S A YEN U F FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 5'40-2910 (714) 962-2411 The Board of Directors has declared their intent to adopt this Ordinance as amended May 14, 1975, at an adjourned meeting to be held May 29, 1975 at 7:30 P.M. at the Districts' administrative offices, 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. If anyone has any questions concerning the provisions of this Ordinance, please call Mr~ John .. Thomas, the Districts' Chief of the Industrial and Permit Division, at (714) 540-2910. THE FOLLOWING AMENOMENTS TO THE MAY 14, 1975 DRAFT OF THIS ORDINANCE HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ARE INCLUDED IN THIS ORDINANCE: Section 302.1, 2nd Paragraph, Item 2 Number aREl-'type of employees and average hours of work per empfoyee. Section 302.21, Item 6, 2nd Paragr~ph Each user shall provide protection from accidental discharge of prohibited materials or other wastes regulated by this Ordinance. Such protection wiU be.designed to secure the discharges to prevent them from entering into the sys·tem in accordance w.ith reasonable engineering standards. Such facilities shall be provided and maintained at the user's expense. Section 302.21, Item 8 Wastewater discharge permits.are issued to a specific user for a specific operation at a specific location and create no vested rights. A Class I wastewater discharge permit shall not be transferred te-a-Rew-ew'ReF-,-a~.ffeFeRt pFemise-eF-~e-a-new-eF-efiaRgea-epeFa~ieR. for an operation at a different location nor for a new or changed operation without prior approval of the General Manager. Section 303.5 Wastewater discharge permits are issued ~o a specific user for a specific oper- ation at a specific location. A Class II wastewater discharge permit shall not be transferred te-a-Rew-ewReP 1 -aiffeFeR~-premise-eF-te-a-Rew-eF-ehangea-e~erat~eRT for an operation at a diffeY1ent location nor for a new or changed operation without prior approval of t~e General Manager. .:coNT INUED- Section 506, 1st Paragraph Any user, permit applicant, or permit holder affected by any decision, action, or determination, including cease and desist ordets, made by the General Manager, interpreting or implementing the provisions of this Ordinance or in . any permit issued herein, may file with the General Manager a written request for reconsideration within ten (10) days of such decision, action, or dctcrmin~ ation, setting forth in detail the facts supporting the user's request .for reconsideration. If-the~FHliHg-ffia~e-hy-the-GeReFa±~~aRageF-iS-HHSatisfaeteFy te-the-~eFseR-Fe~ttestiRg-FeeeRsiaeFatieR,-he-ffiay-witRiR-teR-f±g1-aays-afteF RetifieatieR-ef-the-GeReFa±-MaRagerls-aetieH,-file-a-writteR-ap~ea±-witfi-tke SeeFetaFy-ef-the-BeaFe-af-BiFeeteFs. The General Manager shall rend.er a decision on the request for reccnsideration to the user, permit applicant or permit holder in writing within 15 days of receipt of request. If the Y>-zA.ling on the request for reconsideration made by the General Manager is unsatisfacto1?y, the person requesting reconsideration may, within 10 days ·after notification of ·;, the General Manager's action, file a written appeal with the Secretary of the Board. Section 506, 2nd Paragraph A fee of $100 sh2.ll accompany any appeal to the Board of Directors of the District for a ruling of the District. This fee shall may be refunded if the appeal is sustained in favor of the appellant. Add Section 509 fvaiver of 01'"'dinance Provisions In the event of any declared local, state or federal emergency, the provisions of this Ordinance may be waived by resolution of the Board of Directors. Add Section 510 Local Agency Exemption from Charges No excess capacity charges or use charges as specified he1)ein, shaU be payable for the disaharge of sewage or industrial u,'aste from property in the Distr1:ct owned or leased by elementary, high school, and junior college school dist1)icts, special districts, the County of Orange, and cities, provided however, that such property is not used for proprietary purposes. (NOTE: local agencies are ;wt exempt from District's connection charge_s -See Section 403). (1) (2) ( 3) (4) (5) (6) Section 509, Page 36 -Add Saltarelli's suggestion that in the event of any state or local declared emergency, fees or fines can be waived. Section 510, Page 36 -Re old Article VIII of existing ordinance relative to local agency exemptions Section 302.1, Pa~e 14 -Re Name and Type of employees. Rather than get into pro lem of trying to define that, should delete and add as follows: Paragraph 4.2 -Number of employees and average hours of work per employee. Section 506, Page 35 -Re appeals, point was raised relative to timing by Mr. Elwell. See line 7 & 8. Would recommend that the General Manager shall render his decision on requests for reconsideration to the user, permit applicant or permit holder, in writing, within 15 days of the receipt of the request. Section 302.21, Page 20 -Re accidental discharge, suggested it will be defined to secure the discharges and prevent them from entering the system in accordance with acceptable engineering methods. Section 303.5 -McKnew suggested re "new owner" that this does not having any significant legal meaning except as referring to single owner as opposed to corporation. Don't know if we need to have this requirement re new owner. Main concern is about new premises or different operation. Suggested that Woodruff think about this item and change wording later. 5/14/75 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Winn announced that the Report of the Districts' General Manager, Fred Harper, h ad Joint Chairman been elected to the post of Vice Presiden t of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies at their r e cent me eting in Washington, D.C. Chairman Winn briefly previewed a proposed brochure summarizing p ertinent kl information with regard to the Districts' activities ~ he had r e quested the staff to prepare . The Joint Chairman reported further on the proposed formu l ation of a comm ittee of locally-elected officials representing the TRI-TAC organization s (L eague of California Cities, California Water Pollution Control Association and California As.sociation of Sanitation Agencies) and the County Supervis ors Association, for the purpose of reviewing propos ed re gulations invo lving policy matters affecting local entities. Representatives of the ·sta te Wat e r Resources Control Board and the Environmental Protection Age n cy wo uld als o participate in the committee. Chairman Winn reported tha t he and Mr. Harper would meet with Win Adams, Chairman of the State Water Resources Contr ol Board, during the next week to discuss the conuni tte e ..,_j,),, ~..,;L The Joint Chairman then called an Executive Comm i tte e meeting fo r 5 :30 p .m., a.__.. Thursday, May 29, 1975, immediately preceding tb:e schedul e d a d journ ed joint meeting. L L-,~.P ~lf-l~ ( The General Mana ge r repo rte d th at ~on b~h al f ALL DISTRICTS Report of the of the California Asso c i a tion of Sanitation General Manag e r Agencies, he had ap~d before t he St ate Assembly Natural Resources ai;1~.t and Use Committee hearing s r egardi n g prip~so § ~d ~~· AB 1263 (Badham) which ~p..rco ~des that the Coastal Commission o r a ny r egi ona l conunission c~!!t~regulations which are more restrictive than standards established by any State agency which was created and ,,.f?i/i-;if h · · f M 't'f ~)_ l"d • d. 1 · 1. for t e primary purpose o r~g1:1 at~edS., so i waste1 isposa , air qua ity ~\ and water quality. There appears to-!><> some questio~~ity ""t""'di~~ i the legislature amending Proposition 20 which was passed b1 yawa,~pv:~a: aherf.J, [.,.4c,.; electorate and, therefore, ~t rather than amending the • -~rtt-p~ fJ',.,,"fO resolution by the State legislature would have th~ same effect. Mr. Harper reported that the State Water Resources Control Board had delayed indefinitely)the hearing scheduled for May 12 on the proposed special clean water grant conditions regarding air quality impacts .which would limit the r.at.,o 1£ sny sewer connections in "air quality maintenance areas". A committee of Federal ~d State representatives will meet with agencies in ~ each Air Basin to determine what~mitigation measures will be undertaken in connection with the approval of grant-funded construction projects. The General Manager then introduced the Districts' Chief Engineer who briefly reviewed th e status of the experimental activated carbon treatment system (ACTS). The Boards will be kept apprised of the developments in this regard. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel Woodruff reported that the Report of the transition of the General Counselship appears General Counsel to be proceeding very smoothly. He has met with the staff on several occasions and with th e former General Counsel in this regard. ~~J Mr. Woodruff x-.,: tt"ed briefly on the outstanding 11:U' 111f" litigation regarding the suit brought by AFSCME against tl}.e District;thich i.-s beif1g fiaJHHca lily . IAo--~ ~~'if-JI. Special Labor Counselfi The preliminary hearin g is set for May 22. Ct-- The General Counsel also reported on ~problem relative to failure of the intersection at Westminster and Goldenwest Streets in conn ection with construction o f the Districts ' Knott Interceptor in that vicinity. A City water main failed -2 - causing the ·intersection cave-in. The General Counsel and the Districts' staff h:ift met with representatives of the City of Westminster in this ~1 . . regard. _Lt appears as if the matter has been resolved with the concurrence of the City and the contractors involved. -3- BBl'ORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN I AM PLEASED TO REPORT THAT MR. HARPER WAS RECENTLY ELECTED A V.P. OF AMSA (ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN SEWAGE AGENCIES) ,AND WILL CONTINUE TO DUE AN EXCELLENT JOB REPRESENTING THE INDUSTRY AS A WHOLE AS WELL AS OUR OWN SANITATION DISCTRICTS. CONGRATULATIONS FRED. SOME TIME AGO, I ASKED MR. HARPER TO JOT DOWN SOME OF THE BASIC FACTS PERTAINING TO THE OPERATION OF OUR ORANGE CO. SANITATION DIScrRICTS. WITH THE CONCURRENCE "OF THE: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, STAFF IS PREPARING A SMALL BROCHURE TO BE DISTRIBUTED TO THE DIRECTORS AND OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES. IT SHOULD BE ~PFULL TO ALL OF US AS TO THE SIZE AND SCOPE OF OUR OPERATIONS. IT WILL INCLUDE SUCH THINGS AS ORGANIZATION, BUDGET, PERSONNEL, FLOW, PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND PROPOSED, PLUS QR, ~CAPACITIES AN.EXPLANATION OF THE MORE COMMONLY USED TERMS OR ABBREVIATIONS WE USE. THIS DESCRIPTIVE BROCHURE WILL .READY VERY ·. -SHORTLY. ALL OF YOU RECEIVED A COPY OF MY LETTER TO MR. W.W. ADAMS, CHAIRMAN OF THE STATE WATER RESOURCES BOARD ASKING FOR STATEWIDE CONSIDBRATION OF THE FORMATION OF A COMMITTEE OF LOCALLY ELECTED OFFICIALS REPRESENTING THE TR·:~I TAC ORGANIZATIONS AND THE CO. SUPERVISORS ASS. FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEW- ING PROPOSED REGULATIONS INVOLVING POLICY MATTERS AFFECT- ING LOCAL ENTITIES. YOU ALSO RECEIVED A COPY OF A LETTER ~ FROM MR. GARDNER, CHAIRMAN OF LA CO. SANITATION DIS~RICTS STRONGLY SUPPORTING OUR INTENT. WITH THIS cor~~ITTEE. ~1 ~ I MR. ADAMS WILL MEET WITH MR. HARPER AND I NEXT TUESDAY TO DISCUSS THIS MORE IN DETAIL. I WOULD LIKE TO ADD THAT THE PRESENTING THINKING IS THIS 60MMITTEE SHOULD . BE RELATIVELY SMALL IN NUMBER ADD WITH ENOUGH POLITICAL "CLOUT" SO THAT THE VARIOUS NON ELECTIVE BOARDS AND ... AGENCIES WILL SERIOUSLY CONSIDER THE COMMITTEE INPUT BEFORE POLICIES ARE NEARLY ADOPTED AND/OR PUBLIC HEAR- INGS SET. 'I WILL REPORT MORE ON THIS @ OUR NEXT MEETING. .& ~ NATIONAL 42-383 M9<le i11 U 5 A -~-----+---,/ - t/ / EXCERPTS FROM THE I11INUTES OF TIIE l-\EGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIIillCTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. l; 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, OF ORANGE COlJNrY, CAL:i:J.i\)Ri~lii A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Or~nge County, California, was held at the hour of 7:3o·p.m., May 14 , 1975 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, Califo~nia. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum pres~nt for each District's Board. DISTRICT 1 Adjournment * * * * * * * * * Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 7:30 p ;m., Thursday, May 29, 1975. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:10 p.m., May 14, 1975. DISTRICT 2 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., Thursday, May 29, 1975. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:10 p.m., May 14, 1975. DISTRICT 5 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be. adjourned to 7:30 p.m., Thursday, May 29, 1975. The Chairman: then declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:11 p.m., May 14, ·1975. DISTRICT 6 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No., ·6 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., Thursday, May 29, 1975. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:11 p.m., May 14, 197 5 . DISTRICT 11 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried : That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., Thursday, May 29, 1975. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:12 p.m., May 14, 1975. DISTRICT 3 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., Thursday, May 29, 1975. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 11: 14 p. rn., May 14, 1975 ., DISTRICT 7 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., Thursday, May 29, 1975. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:15 p.rn., May 14, 1975. . . .. -...... . STATE OF CALIFORNIAl SS. · COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11; of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 14th day of May 19 75. ' 15th S-107 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,·I have hereunto set my hand this day of May, 1975, . l.~oe n.is oi .01rc;;_:: tu1·~; anitation Districts Noa. , 6, 7, and .11