The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1975-03-2611 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX Bl 27, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE .(EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) March 20, 1975 NOTIC~ OF ADJOURNED REGULAR.MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 WEDNESDAY, MARCH 26, 1975, 5:30 P.M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 Pursuant to adjournment of the regular· meeting of March 12, 1975, the Boards of Directors of Covn°tJJ'J Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Grange County, California, will meet in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date. JWS:rb -- ~· MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS March 26 , l975 -5:30 p .m . Pos t Office Box 8 127 1084 4 Ellis Ave nue Fountain Va ll ey, Cal if ., 92708 Tele phones: Area Cod e 714 540-29 10 962-2411 The fo l lowing is a brief explanation of the more impor t non-rout i ne items wh i ch appear on the enclosed agenda a nd wh ich a r e n ot ot h erwi se se l f -exp l anatory . J o int Boards No. 8 -Staff Report re: $3 .5 Million Step 1 Grant for Treatment Plant· Fac ilities Plan Env ir onmental I mpact Statement and JPL Pilot Plant Project . The Boards adjourned from March 12th to the above hour and date for the p u rpose of considering staff recommendations for the implementation of the rec ently-approved $3 .5 million State and Federal g rant . Enclosed with the agenda material is a report with rec ommendations to enter into agreements with consultants to prepare the required elements of the p lanni ng g rant . We propose to outline in considerable detail Wednesday how the Facilities Pl a n, the Environmental Assessment, and the JPL pilo t work will be tied toge t her in a mean ingful co nc l usion from whi c h the Dis ~ tricts will construct the necess ary facilities to meet State a n d Federal discharge r equirements . It is the staff 's recommendat i on that the rec ommended serv i ce contracts be approved . No . 9 -Spe cial Se l ect i on Committee for Au d it Services Recommend a tion . As previously announced, t he Special Selection Comm i ttee will r ep ort its re commen dati ons r e l ative to the employment of an audit o r to conduct the 1974 -75 fi scal year audit . Di strict No . 7 No . 21 -Proposal of Goode and Go ode , Rea l Estate Apprais e r s , f or Appr aisal Serv i ces . The staff has requ ested a pr op osal from the real estate apprai sal firm of Goode and Goode for the purpose of determining the v alue of rights of way required for the construction of Contract No . 7-6-7 , Tustin -Or ange Trunk Sewer from Irvine Boulevard to Fa i rhaven. I t i s the sta f f 's recommendation that the fir m of Goode and Goode be engaged on a per diem basis for an amount not to exceed $7,500 as described in their proposal for Phase 1 . The Board approved the plans a n d specifi cations for this project on Ma r ch 12th . District No. 11 Nos. 24 through 32 -The i tems appearing on the agenda f or Distri ct No . 1 1 were carried over from March 12th because of the lack of a quorum. These items were adopted by the other Dis - t r i cts u n der Joint business . No. 3 1 -Districts 2 ,3,5 ,7 have adopted a uniform ann~xa tion policy effective July 1 , in accordance with the enclosed re - port . I t is the staff 's recommendation that the District No. 1 1 Boar d approve Resolution No. 75 -49 -11, adopting a u niform annexa- tion policy relative to annexation fees, to be computed annually at the beginning of each fiscal year (July 1st), based on the net wo r th of the Distr ict , divided by the ac r eage within the Distr i ct . No. 32 -Plans and Specifications for Remodeling of the New l and -Hamilton Pump Station , Contract No. ll -4R. For several years, we have budgeted funds for the re- modeling of this pump station to make its appearance more com- patible with the surrounding res i dential area . The proposed improvements have been approved by the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Building Department. The contract to be let will improve the adjacent Southern Counties Gas Company facilities as wel l as our own. The total cost of the contract will not exceed $20 ,000, wi th the Southern Counties Gas Company 's share · at $4 ,000. It is the staff's recommendation that the project be advertised for bidding purposes. Fred A. Harper General Manager II FI LE ················- LETTER ······- A/C ••.• TKLR _ -····•••0••••-... - BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sani tation Di stricts Post Office Bo~ 812 7 of O range Co unt y, Ca liforni a 10844 Ellis Ave nue Founta in Valley, Calif., 92708 · Telephones: JOINT · BOARDS . AD JO URNED REGU LAR MEE TI NG MAR CH 26 , 1975 -5:30 P.M. Area Code 71-4 S.C0-2910 962-2-411 AG E N D A AOJOURNM!:rlTS POSTED • .: COMP & MILEAGE ..... ~ .. . FILES SET UP . .' .... ~ ....... .. f<ESOl.U1 1Qt,S CERTIF IED.!::"" LClTERS V:lllHEM ............. . MINU1 ES \'/Rii • :r1 ... V.::::: .• MINUTES HLED ..... L.-:-......... . (1) Pledge .of Allegiance and .Invocation ( 2) Roll Call -I Ir 0..... -\--t-L-, , (3) Appointment of Ch a irmen pro tern, if necessary ~/ <-'-"-V-- ( 4) (4 ) DISTRICTS 1 ,2, 3 & 7 . Consideration of motion to receive and fil e minute e xcerp ts fro m the Cities o f Tustin ahd Y~rba Linda regardin g election of mayors and ap pointment of alternat es to serve on the .Distric t s ' Boards as follows: (*Mayor) · District Active Alternate ' 1,7 Donald J . Sal tarelli* James G. Sharp -~ ........... 2 Dale T . Chaput Carolyn Peirce Ewin g * \..~~~ Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the Cities of Brea, Irvine, LaHabra and IT!l.'.S ON sur~u:.~·.:1~rAl AGENDA Or ange regarding election of mayors and appointment o f alternates to serve bn the Districts ' Boards as f ol lows: · (*Mayo r ) FILE ········A······- LETTER ·-·-·- A/C _ .. TKLR - '-(5) ~· 6 District 2 3 7 2 3 2 7 ALL DISTRICT S · Rep ort of the ALL DISTRI CT S Report of the ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Active Leon ard MacKa i n * Dona l d Fox J ohn H. Bu rton Rob i n Young Beth Graham* Joe Temp l e * James Jackman Jo i n t Chairman Gen e ral Mana ge r · Ge n e ral Co unsel Al ternate Do n a l d Fox ~\.a....t>.._., Leonard MacKain * . · Ar thur W. Anthony* ~v.... ......... --...;.. Beth Graham* Robert Nevil ~ALL DISTRICTS ~ Staff report on implementation plan re $3.5 million grant for development of Treatment Plant Facilities Plan and Environmental Impact Statement including the 1 MGD JPL pilot plant project (a) Roff C!ll Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot ,--.. "' ~~······::··;L" LmER ~(_ ____ _ A/C .... TKLR •••• ~~:::. (b) Rolf Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot .·-, v (, -~~).··-:--·- LETTER -~~--~--~;.- A/C •••• TKLR ·-· ~Q~.::.~:~~:.~ (c) Rolf Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot I~ ' ••• Jt(.: ....... _ LETTER :fr~.::.'::._ A/C •••• TKLR ·-· ~ ~-~-~~::.~:"!± (d) Roll C2ll Vote ar Cast Unanimous Ballot ~~.· ..... ~:·~·-···- LETTER •• L . .:.._ A/C •... TKLR - ~ '.sitJ. 0.c'.ll:-~..C·' -.. _1, '"'.::.---~·-····--··-- Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of John Carollo Engineers, dated March 14, 1975, for preparation of Treatment Plant Facilities Plan, on a per diem fee basis, for a total amount not to exceed $100~000; and pilot and test work, on a per diem fee basis, for a total amount not to exceed $50,000; and adopting Resolution No. 75-45, authorizing execution of an agreement for said services, in form approved by the General Counsel. See pages "A" and "B" Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of J. B. Gilbert and Associates, dated March 18, 1975, for preparation of Environmental Impact Statement re Treatment Plant Facilities Plan, on a per diem fee basis, for a total amount not to exceed $60,000; and adopting Resolution No. 75-46, authorizing execution of an agreement for said services, in form approved by the General Counsel.· See pages "C" and "D" Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of John Carollo Engineers, dated March 17, 1975, for engineering services re design of reactivated carbon wastewater treatment plant pilot project, on a per diem fee basis, for a total amount not to exceed $255,000; and adopting Resolution No. 75-47, authorizing execution of an agreement for said services, in form approved by the General Counsel. See pages "E" and "F" Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, dated March 19, 1975, for services in connection with the JPL reactivated carbon wastewater treatment project,: on a per diem fee basis, for a total amount not to exceed $280,000; and adopting Resolution No. 75-48, authorizing execution of an agreement for said services, in form approved by the General Counsel. See pages "G" and "H" ( 9) ALL DISTRICTS -. ( \ v FILT-··· mE~~~ ~ A/C .... TKLR .... Consideration of recommendation of Special Selection Committee for Audit Services re engagement of auditor to conduct the 1974-75 fiscal year audit: e/: (b) Report of Special Selection Committee for Audit Services Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal ofqh~ .. t ~~-<.::.. ... ,\t~~-~ "\-c~. to provide audit services for the 1974-75 fiscal year, for an amount.n~t to exceed $ ~~··~~;:,5: rL.> i'~.:,~,.,.~-•-~---ks'. 3-~"··-~-\.,, '!-,~---~-a--'-:" ___ _ "'! \) ... -2- .· · .. -/60f'J ALL DISTRICTS ~ Other business and communications, if any ~. 75 -so , . ,_1LE -·-·"( 11) DISTRICT 1 LEmR ···-··-·"" \_Other qu s~ communications, if any A/' _TKJ.R .... ~ --· .. -....... : .... ( 12) DISTRICT 1 , -·-······-···-···· Consideration of motion to adjourn ~-.::-3 (15) ~ ___ k::: __ _ (16) .......__...... LfTIER ·--······· DISTRICT 2 Other bus :ines-s -and communications, if any \....: DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn 8:~~ DISTRICT~~ \.Q!_her busines s-and communications , if any DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~:~~ A/C .... TKLR ••.. ( 17) DISTRICT 5 . Other business and communications -··-··---········· G --·-··-·-·-( 1 7 ITEMS ON SUPPLEMENTAL AGE"NOA Consideration of Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency (See meeting folder) (18) (19) (20) (21) ~---~ .. :" \ :> LEmR i.tl:: .. ~ A/C •... TKlR .... DISTRICT ~ 'Considerat1'0-B~tion to adjourn DISTRIC~ C]:t ner bus:lrres..s and communications, if any f> .. 13 DI STR ICT 6 Considerat ion of motion to adjourn s:o3 DISTRICT 7 Conside ration of motion to r ece ive, file and accept pro posal of Good e & Go ode, Real Estate Appraisers , dated March 20, 1 9 75, for app raisal servic e s in connection with acquisition of ri g ht of wa y for Contract No. 7-6-7, Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer ~ Reach 11 and a Portion of Reac h 1 2 , from Irvine Boulevard to Fairhaven, on a per diem fee basis, for an ' amount not to exceed $7,500. See page "I" I• DI STR IC U~ Other busines s-aHd-communications, if any DISTRI CT 7 Cons iderati on of motion to adjourn ~.c( DUE TO LACK OF QUORUM AT THE REGULAR MARCH 12, 1 975 MEETING , THE FILE ·-··········""' FO LLOWING ITEM S WERE CARRIED OVER FOR DI STR ICT 11: lETIER ···---··- A/ KLR .... ( 2 4 ) - -··-··-············· (-,a.) -·····-·-·····0~ \s DISTRICT 11 Consideration o f motion to receive and fil e commen t s of Kerr Glass Manufacturing Corporation, dated February 1 3 , 1 9 75, in connection with the Districts' tentat ive draft o f r evised Uniform Co nnec t io n and Us e Ordinance and re f e r t o st aff and General Counsel -3- (25) (26) Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot (28) ( 29) ( 30) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to receive, file and reject amended claim of Kelly Timothy Kellas filed by Charles A. Price, Attorney for Claimant, for alleged damage or injury incurred in an accident involving a District- owned vehicle, as recommended by the General Counsel DISTRICT 11 Consideration of Resolution .No. 75-37, approving License to Occupy Right of Way with Jack R. Fenton and Wayne R. Peterson, A Partnership, and authorizing District No. 1 to execute said license, in form approved by General Counse 1. See paged ".I" DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress report on Treatment Plant Construction Projects. See page "K" DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to receive, file and take under advisement tentative draft of revised Uniform Connection and Use Ordinance, dated March, 1975, and authorizing the staff to circulate the proposed ordinance and schedule informal hearings DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to receive and file certification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment DISTRICT 11 ROLL Ciill VOIT ............. - Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund accounts payable check registers for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing payment of claims as listed on page "L" l=ILE ···············-~lEm;J.--.!:.~-( 31 ) A/C •••• TKLR - DISTRICT 11 (a) Consideration of annexation policy and f~e schedule. See page "M" .. --·····-···-·;:;~Call Vote or Cast ( b ) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-49-11, establishing fees and procedures concerning annexation of territory u~:inirr.ous Ballot ( 32) ( 34) to the District. · See page "N" DISTRICT 11 Consideration of Resolution No. 75-40-11, approving plans and specifications to Remodel Newland-Hamilton Pumping Station Facilities, Contract No. ll-4R, and authorizing advertising for bids. See page "O" DISTRICT ll .. __ . ..--- OtJ:i~F busine.ss .a!'ld cornmuiirea.t1.ons ~ny- DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~·. c~ -4- II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ell is Ave n ue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telep hone s: JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITE MS MARCH 26, 1975 -.5:30 P.M. DISTRICT S 2 , 3 · & 7 (4) Consi d eration o f mo tion to re ce i ve and file minute excerpts from t he Ci ties of Br ea , I r v i ne, LaHa b ra and Orang e r egardin g ele ct i on o f mayors and appo i ntment of alternat e s to s erve on th e Di stri cts ' Boards a s foll ows: (*Ma yor) Di.st rict DIS TRICT 5 2 3 7 2 3 2 7 11.c tive Leona rd MacKain * Don ald Fo x John H. Burto n Robin You n g Beth Gr a h am * J oe Temp l e * James Jackman Alt ernate Dona l d F ox Leonard MacKain* Ar t hur W. Anthony * Beth Graham* Robert Nevil" J ames Jackman Joe Temple * (l7) Cons i de r a tio n of Jo int Exercise of Powers Agreement Creat i ng Newport -Irvine Waste -Management Planning Agency (See meeting folder ) · RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS March 26, 1975 -5:30 p.m. '-'/j:... JOHN CAROLLO ' '\.. PHOENIX WALNUT CREEK " '. ARIZONA CALIFORNIA JOHN A. CAROLLO, P.E. < 1906-1971 > H. HARVEY HUNT, P.E. HOWARD M. WAY, P.E. ROBERT ·G. WILLIAMS, P.E. DONALD R. PREISLER, P.E. GAIL P. LYNCH, P.E. Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Califo~nia 92708 .ENGINEERS SANTA ANA CALIFORNIA WALNUT CREEK PLAZA, SUITE 750 1990 NORTH CALIFORNIA BLVD. WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94596 AREA CODE; 1415) 932-1710 March 14, 1975 Subject: Proposal for Facilities Plan including Master Planning for Joint Works Treatment and Disposal. System. In accordance with your request, we have prepared for your consideration and discussion this proposal to accomplish certain engiJ?-eering services you require. INTRODUCTION In accordance with the State Water Resources Control Board and the Environmental Protection Agency regulations and guidelines, the Districts and ourselves prepared a Project Report for improved treatment which is required at the Joint Works. Most of the required new work was at Plant No. 2. This report was submitted to the State on March 1, 1974. The report covered required improvements to permit the Joint Works treatment and disposal system to meet newly promulgated State and EPA discharge requirements. · · Subsequent to submission ·of the Project Report, the Districts were notified that the EPA would be required to write an Environmental° Impact Statement (EIS) on the Project. (We understand that the EPA is planning to contract with the Districts to accomplish the EIS and this will be started shortly. ) In a recent meeting between members of your staff, ourselves, and representatives from the State Water Resources Control Board and the EPA, it became apparent that the Districts woul~ be required to amend and update the 1974 Project Report to accomplish the required Facilities Plan prior to being able to proceed further with required improved treatment at the Joint Works. This new effort to incorporate the JPL work and all work anticipated at both treatment plants for a 25 year period. This Facilities Plan to be prepared concurrently with the aforementioned EIS. In general, the Facilities Plan is to cover all work projected to be required at the Joint Works to the year 2000. It would basically be to develop a master plan for treatment and disposal for both treatment plants. AGENDA ITEM #8(a) A-1 Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 2 March 14, 1975 In order to be in a position t9 qualify for currently available grant funds, it will probably be advantageous to develop two recommended plans during preparation of the Facilities Plan. One would incorporate the JPL ACTS Process which the Districts are currently developing, and the other would be for conventional secondary treatment. It would also . be expedient to accomplish pilot work on both the JPL ACTS Process and conventional secondary treatment concurrently with the preparation of the Facilities Plan. ·This would allow the Districts to be in a poqition to proceed immediately with the final design of either "recommended plan" in time to qualify for currently allocated Federal funds. Note that the design of facilities must be complete by mid 1977, to qualify for monies which have been allocated. Therefore, the Districts 1nust be in a position to start final desi n of the last ro · ect of their staged program by early 197 • (It requires twelve to fifteen m.onths to design a major treat- ment plant expansion such as will be required.} Therefore, scheduling for the Facilities Plan, EIS and pilot work should be set for completion by early 1976. SCOPE OF WORK We propose a scope of work.as follows: ' A. Pilot and Test Work Perform in depth laboratory analyses, field testing, and pilot plant studies to determine the most cost-effective way of meeting overall project objectives. (JCE would draw from prior experience in this area which would materially reduce the total cost for this phase of the work.} This would include, but not be limited to, the following investigations.: 1. JPL ACTS Process Proceed with the development and pilot plant work on the JPL Process (to be accomplished under a separate contract). 2. Conventional Activated Sludge I• Operate and observe the 30, 000-gpd activated sludge pilot plant on Plant No. 2 wastewater. Determine if pretreatment is required to p,revent the activated sludge process from becoming upset while treating wastewater normally arriving at Plant No. 2. If upsets occur with the 30, 000-gpd pilot plant, operate with various pretreatment processes to evaluate their efficiency in preventing upsets. We propose that laboratory work be accomplished by the Districts or an outside laboratory under our general direction. AGENDA ITEM #8(a) A-2 ALL DISTRICTS Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts o.f Orange County Page 3 March 14, 1975 3. Pure Oxygen Activated Sludge Operate a pure oxygen activat~d sludge ·pilot plant on Plants No. 1 and No. 2 wastewater to determine treatability and feasibility of utilizing this process. We propose that the Districts arrange with Unox to furnish a pilot plant for a three (3) to.four (4) month test program. We ·propose to operate the plant. with general su- . pervision and start-up assistance furnished by the supplier of the pilot plant. We propose that laboratory work be furnished by the Districts . or an outside laboratory. B. Facilities Plan and Master Plan A considerc;.ble amount of work has been done to date under the previously completed Project Report for Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, which is directly applicable to the currently required Facilities Plan. The scope of work listed below is additional work required to complete the required Facilities Plan and Master Plan for the Joint Works (Plant No. 1 and No. 2). Most of the work will be in- volved vr.i.th development 0£ treatment requirements for Plant No. 1. The following scope of work includes for preliminary engineering in the form of detailed design criteria, hydraulic analyses, pump station selection and sizing, treatment unit sizing and layout and a detailed estimate of construction cost for initial facilities required to bring the Joint Works system into complianc.e with cur.rent regulations. This preliminary engineering is required to comply with the State's current gUidelines for project reports. Scope of work for Facilities Plan and the Master Plan woUld consist of: 1. Meet with the Districts' staff to establish a detailed scope and ·schedule of work. 2. Meet with the Districts' staff and State and ' Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) staffs to confi~m steps to be taken to assure a smooth "flow" of the project, through approval and funding. · 3. Determine wastewater flow for present and potential dischargers in Orange County utilizing information recently developed by John Carollo Engineers and the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. We will analyze results of the new metering data and will draw conclusions as to current and projected flows. 4. Review and incorporate. data from the State of California Basin Plan now under preparation, and the Santa Ana Watershed Planning Agency Study. This is necessary to show conformance with the State's guidelines on project funding limits relative to projected growth. 5. Update wastewater characteristics for the Joint Works and project future characteristics based on past trends and projected AGENDA ITEM #8(a) 1\-3 J\LL DISTRICTS Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Prange County Page 4 March 14, 1975 growth. Most of this work has been done. Records must be analyzed for the last year and this information incorporated to provide an up-to- date analysis. · 6. Review latest information developed by the Districts' industrial waste monitoring program. Determine in cooperation with the Districts·• staff how the major industrial dischargers may affect the addition of improved treatment at the Joint Works. 7. If required, assist the Districts in negotiating for modified discharge and effluent requirements. The current NPDES permit will expire when the flows reach 184 MGD and will need to be renewed at that time. Meet with the Regional Board and discuss any probable changes which may be made in the NPDES permit when it is renewed. 8. $tudy and evaluate treatment alternates that could meet the more restrictive water quality requirements set forth by the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the EPA in the NPDES ·permit. Coordinate and discuss with the Regional Water Quality Control Board staff the results of o-µr findings. These treatment alternatives would also ·recognize futur~ State and Federal requirt,ments. 9. Study and evaluate treatment alternatives that could be incorporated with existing facilities, as required·, to meet the more restrictive requirements. Delineate individual design, size, and capacity of processes; prepare cost-effective comparisons which relate to ~xi sting and future needs to be served. Will incorpo·rate findings related to JPL ACTS Process. Actual work and development of criteria and costing on the JPL Process will be done under a separate contract. · Coordinate and discuss facility selection and the results of findings with the Districts and regulatory agencies. 10. Investigate and develop a solids handling program for the selected facilities, including, buf not necessarily limited to, the solids process streams from pretreatment, primary and secondary sedimentation, sludge thickening, digesting, etc. Consider _goals and results, if any, of the joint Los Angeles County, Los Angeles City and Orange County solids disposal study which will be underway concurrently. I. 11. For the viable alternatives set forth preliminary design criteria, including hydraulics, basic layouts, process information, operational modes, etc. Summarize the basis for selected processes which indicate that effluent will meet applicable effluent standards and is capable of meeting best practical treatment technology requirem.ents in the future. Prepare preliminary estimates of cost for selected methods of treatment. AGENDA ITEM #8(a) A-4 ALL DISTRICTS Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation. Districts of Orange County Page 5 March 14, 1975 These costs would include capital and operating costs. Review results with the Districts' staff to assure consistency with the Districts' goals and operating capability. 12. In accordance with the ·above concept, determine a plant layout that would make the most effective use of existing land for ·ultimate development at Plants No. 1 and No. 2. Determine plant layout for first phase construction. Such plant layout work to be carefully reviewed with the Districts 1 staff. · 13. Set forth flood hazard protection required to meet regulatory agency requirements. Much work has been done by the Districts on this at Plant No. 1. Something similar should be done at Plant No. 2 to protect facilities and to meet State and EPA guidelines on flood protection. 14. Prepare a Facilities Plan Reporf as required by the Environmental Protection Agency and the State setting forth that information required for project approval by EPA and State. This report will include alternative plans for meeting the requiremen~s of the Districts, the State and the EPA. These alternative pians will be compared on the basis of environmental impact, cost, and effectiveness .. Two plans may be recomm.ended, depending on the outcome of ~ilot testing of the JPL ACTS Process. The recommended plans will encompass a 5-year period with the first phase being the construction of facilities outlined in the State's 1973-74 Project Priority List. 15. Detailed design criteria including type and size of process units, equipment used and costs will be provided for the recommended plans. Emphasis will be placed on initial construction required to bring the Joint Works into compliance with current requirements. Detailed criteria will be provided fo.r the facilities required during the first 5 years. 16. Prepare a schedule for implementation of the project. Detailed schedules will be developed for initj.al work required (first 5 years) with general scheduling set forth for the facilities required after the initial 5 year program. 17. Prepare a preliminary operation ,and maintenance program (Title 40, Chapter I, Part 35. 925-10). 18. Provide information to the EIS contractor as requested by the Districts. Meet with the EIS contractor as directed by the Districts and as required t9 discuss the project. AGENDA ITEM #8(a) A-5 ALL DISTRICTS Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts ·of Orange County Page 6 March 14, 197~ 19. Present the Facilities Plan to the Districts for their approval. Upon receiving the Districts' comments and suggestions, revise, as required, the report for submittal to the State and EPA. 20. Meet with the Districts, State, EPA, Coastal Coffimissions, Basin Contractor, etc., as required to complete and receive approval of the Facilities Plan. Work to be Accomplished by the Districts or Others The following items will be required in addition to that presented above to satisfy the requirements of the State Water Quality Control-Board for approval of a project grant. The first three items were accomplished by the Districts' staff for the 1973-74 Project Report and it is anticipated that minimal work will be required to update this information for the new Facilities Plan. 1. Sewer System Evaluation including an infiltration/inflow analysis (Title 40, Chapter!, Part 35.927). 2. Preparation of information required on industrial discharges as outlined in "Industrial Cost Recovery Guidelines." 3. User Service Charge information (Guidelines published May 22, 1973, in the Federal Register) and revenue projections. 4. Environmental Impact Statement (required by EPA). SCHEDULE We propose to accomplish the·above Scope of Work in accordance with scheduling to be mutually agreed upon by the Districts and ourselves; said schedule to consider requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board and the EPA. We would anticipate preparation of the Facilities Plan concurrently with the EIS, which will be done by others with completion 8 to 10 months following authorization to proceed. I' FEE. We propose to provide the engineeririg services described above on a per diem basis, at. hourly rates, as set forth in our standard Fee Schedule. A copy of the current Fee Schedule is attached. We suggest a budget amount of $50,000 for the "Pilot and Test Work." We suggest a budget amount of $100,000 for'the "Facilities Plan and Master Plan." AGENDA ITEM #8(a) A-6 ALL DISTRICTS Mr. Fred.A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 7 March 14, 1975 Additional work which may be outside the Scope of Work described above and is authorized by the Districts would be accomplished on a per diem basis, at hourly rates, as set forth in .our standard Fee Schedule. We request that payments be made monthly, based on actual ti~e spent during the previous month. We suggest 5% retention of said payments until completion· of the Facilities Plan, with the retained 5% being payable upon submission of the final report. · The per diem rates mentioned would cover our overhead, telephone, miscellaneous, printing, etc. Printing of the final report would be billed at our cost. 100 copies will be printed unless otherwise directed. Any outside services which may be required and are authorized by the Districts woul~ be billed at our cost, plus 10%. Cost of travel and subsistence required and authorized by the Districts, except travel from our offices to the Districts' office would be billed at our cost. Thank you for the opportunity of presenting this proposal. Very truly yours, JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS li ~~ Jl~:f-. H. Harvey Hunt IIBH/WRH:kb Attachment ,, AGENDA ITEM #8(a) A-7 ALL DISTRICTS TITLE Partner Head Engineer Project Engineer Senior Engineer Engineer Associate Engineer Assistant Engineer Junior Engineer Senior Designer Designer Senior Draftsman Draftsman Junior Draftsman Clerical Typist JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FEE SCHEDULE RATE PER·HOUR $ 36.50 35.00 3LOO 28.00 26.50 24.50 22.50 20.50 18.50 16.20 14.00 12.00 10.20 12.00 10.00 This schedule is subject to change on May l5, 1975. I• I' AGENDA ITEM #8(a) A-8 ALL DISTRICTS RESOLUTION NO. 75-45 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS RE PREPARATION OF FACILITIES PLAN A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITA~ION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE 90UNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREE-. MENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR PREPARATION OF TREATMENT PLANT FACILITIES PLAN * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, Califqrnia, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated by and between County Sanitation Distrtcts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County and John Carollo Engineers, for preparation of treatment plant facilities plan, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for iaid s~rvices is hereby authorized on a per rliem fee basis for a total amount not to exceed $100,000.00 for said facilities plan; and on a per diem fee basis for a total amount not to exceed $50,000.00 for pilot ~nd test work; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanit.ation District.No. 1 are· hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of its elf and Districts Nos. 2, 3., 5, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel. AGENDA ITEM #8(a) -B-ALL DISTRICTS J.B. Gilbert & Associ<1tcs Planning & Engineering Consultllnts. 1101 H Street. Sacrrnncnto. Ca DS814 (91G) 444·0123 Cl Bay Arca Office: March 18, 1.975 Clmemdnt Hotel. Berkeley, ca D4 705 ~ (415) 843·0298 0 Tnhoc Office: 2155 South Street, P. o. Box 14446 South Lake Tahoe. CJ D5702 Mr. Ray Lewis Chief Engineer . County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 f o u n ta i n Va 1 1 e y , Ca· l i f o r n. i a 9 2 7 0 8 Facilities Plan Environmental Impact Report/Statement Dear Mr. Lewis: This letter and attachments constitute a proposal to complete an environmental impa~t report and statement to satisfy the r~quirements of State and Federal law on the Districts' proposed facilities plan.· Attached are a draft copy of an Agreement which outlines the basis for providing assistance to the· Districts and Agreement 9ttachments (A) an outline, (B) estimate of work effort, (C) list of assumptions regarding the work effort, and (D) schedule of professional fees. In recent months, the requ~red scope and emphasis of EPA on (916) 541·5775 some statements has expanded significantly. Thereforei it is difficult to project the exact manhours required to provide the necessary environmental information or to· respond to issues raised d~ring the process. However, assuming that the scope of the .document acceptable to· EPA would be similar to that recently prepared for the A 1 fso Agency by. EPA, we propose to complete the Draft Environmental Impact Report/Statement on a time and materials basis not to exceed $60,000. Should issues arise (Attachment C) that are beyond t~e initially agreed upon level of effort, we assume that the work would be undertaken on the basis of time and materials in accordance with Attachment D and subject to the Districts' approval regarding the level of effort in each case. · The work wi 11 be under my genera 1 direction wit~. Mr. Kris Lindstrom being assigned on a full-time basis for most if not all of the .study period. Other technical specialists of our staff will participate in the project. Subject to your approval, the <"•·11·.·d•irl!'.-'·'.''-11 ···; f I l .11'.iH)J\1111·111 ["_~\\';11 ·r f_]\\.;1 :1!"",.!t· I~'.'" 1.'lit:'1""'1', I ,11.1;1· AGENDA ITEM #8(b) C-1 ALL DISTRICTS Mr. Ray Lewis 2 Ma re h 18, 1975 general approach and format would be similar to that undertaken in the Sacramento and San Francisco plans EIS's. We c er ta i n 1 y a p p r e c i a t e t h i s o p p o r t u n i t y to a s s i s t t h e o· i s· t r i c t and look forward to interesting and constructive program development. Very truly yours, J .. B. GILBERT & ASSOCIATES Gilbert Attachments 'f. :; ,..-.... '_) tri 'J: _,,,,.. i)l«1nr1i11g"l\:En~Urw<·ri11; .. 1,< 1111.·~11l1;111t~; .J.l}.(iill HTl ,~ AGENDA ITEM #8(b) C-2 ALL DISTRICTS ATTACHMENT A ANNOTATED OUT~INE OF. PROPOSED DRAFT EIR/EIS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY FACILITIES PLAN PART I BACKGROUND I. INTRODUCTION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEMS AND THE "OBJECTIVES OF PROPOSED ALTERNAT1VES A. Ba~kground on Sanitation Districts A brief summary of the history and growth experienced in Orange County and the formation of the OCSD. B. Existing Wastewater Treatment Facilities and Their Performance Describe existing collection system, treatment plants, and ocean outfalls. Summarize flows, removal efficiencies, effluent quality, and monitoring results. C. De·scription of the Need for Additional Facilities PL 92-500· requirements, ocean plan requirement~, Santa Ana River Interceptor--non~eclaimable waste line, .9 rowt h. II. ENVIRONMENTAL S~TTING. A. Geographic Setting Describe Orange County briefly including major attractions, climate, ocean, mountains,· major freeways, railroads, etc. B. Topography Describe drainage basins, terrain, sho~elin~, and continental shelf. C. Geologic Features Describe generalized geology and processes affecting c o n f i g u r a t i o n o. f t h e 1 a n d , d i s c u s s g e o 1 o g i c h a z a rd s s u c h a s landslides, liquifaction, earthquakes, and min~ral resources. AGENDA ITEM #8(b) C-3 ALL DISTRICTS 2 D. Soils Generalized soil conditions within County and s·pecific soils types at treatment plant sites which may. influence planning efforts. Discuss marine sediments near ocean outfall. E. Hydrology Summarize surface waters, groundwater problems, flooding problems, and salt water intrusion problems. · F. Meteorology Discuss climate and existing air quality and the factors which influence air quality including winds, temperature inversions, sunlight, and storms .. G. Marine Environment Discuss coastal resources, onshore, nearshore, and offshore areas, currents, and other oceanographic conditions. H. Biological Resources Describe different environmental conditions and biotic communities of the County. Describe.the flora and fauna present in the project area, describe terrestrfal and marine biological communities nea.r trea·tment plants and outfall including any rare or endangered species. · ·] . Arch a e o l o g i c.a l , Pa 1 eon to l o g i ca 1 , a·n d Hi st or i ca 1 Re~ our c es Summarize what has been discovered of importance in project or service area and potential for future discoveries. J. Noise Describe existing sou·rces of noise in project area. K. Aesthetics Discuss relationship between treatment plants and encroaching development, odors, and other potential nuisance factors associated with wastewater treatment processes. AGENDA ITEM #8(b) C-4 ALL DISTRICTS 3 I I I • LAN D U S E A N D P 0 P Ul AT I 0 N A. Population Summarize population of County and Districts. Describe population characteristics. B. Land Use Summarize existing land use such as number of acres under certain uses, number of housing units, etc., for service area and area around treatment plants. C. Economic Develbpment Describe commercial and industrial development, employ- ment, agriculture, and role the County plays in State and regional economy. D •. Transportation Summarize existing transportation modes, systems, and traffic volumes with particular emphasis on areas surrounding treatment plant site~. IV. WATER, WASTEWATER, AND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT A. Water Supply Summarize existing water sources, projected water imports and water quality. Describe agencies responsible and their facilities. B. Wastewater Management Di~cuss regional sanitation agencies and their service ~reas and ·systems. C. Reclamation . Discuss OCSD-OCWD joint efforts, other potential reclamation projects planned or proposed. D. Solid Waste Discuss municipal disposal, landfill sites, sludge d i s p o·s a 1 p r o b 1 em s . .AGENDA ITEM #8(b) · C-5 ALL DISTRICTS• --'· 4 . E. Institutional Framework Affecting the Environment' Discuss the role of agencies whose policies or legislative mandate will influence the planning for the proposed project/s. Provide a matrix summarizing agencies and their authority. F. Summary of Current Regulatory Criteria Federal Industrial Pretreatment, NPDES requirements, Department of Health. PART I I WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM V. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES A. Treatment Alternatives Describe the various treatment alternatives and discuss industrial pretreatment: · B. Disposal Alternatives Discuss various disposal alt~rnatives including w~stewater reclamation and reuse potential, land disposal, and ocean disposal. VI. PRIMARY IMPACTS OF ALTERNATIVES A. Source Control 1. Iridustri~l Pretreatment B. Construction Impacts l. Physical/chemical_ Air, land, noise, water, aesthetics. 2. Biol0gical Impacts on marine and terrestrial environment. AGENDA ITEM #8(b) C-6 ALL DISTRICTS · 5 3. Social/economic a. Resources utilization Land, minerals, energy, and employment. b. Utilities disruption c. Cultural and scientific factors · C. Operational Impacts 1. Physical/chemical Water quality, air quality, noise, and aesthetics. 2. Biological Ocean and terrestrial ~cology. 3. Social/economic a. Eco~omic . b. Energy utilization c. Other resources d. Public health D. Problematic Impacts l. Seismic 2. Flood 3. Power reliability VII. SECONDARY IMPACTS A. Relationship Between Public Utilities and Growth Describe the cause-effect relationships between growth and utilities and give examples of this relationship. B. Dynamics of Growth 1. Countywide Describe historical growth patterns of County and stimuli causing growth AGENDA ITEM #8(b) . C-7 ALL DISTRICTS 6 . 2. Service Area OCSD Describe historical growth of cities and unincorporated areas within Sanitation District boundaries. 3. Utility and· circulation· growth and development patterns Discuss freeway construction and the demand for utilities. 4. Social and economic factors Discuss recreation, dependence on automobile, consumer trends, employment, and existing tax rates. C. Future Developmerit Prospe~ts 1. Population growth Show estimates of future population growth made by various agencies. Describe projected land use and where growth is lik~ly to occur. 2. Utilities and roads • Describe future expansions in utility services, freeways, mass transit, power plants, water supply, and other influences on growth. 3. Regulatory programs impacting growth policies Coastal Commission, County growth policy, land use planning legislation, and other factors .. D. lmpacts of Future Development 1 . Air Qua 1 i ty Describe projected impact of growth on air quality emissions, existing air quality improvement programs including Air Quality Maintenance Plans. AGENDA ITEM #8(b) C-8 ALL DISTRICTS 7 a. Mobile sources Descri.be projected increases in VMT possible from future development and efforts to control mobile source emissions. b. Stationery sourc~s Describe increases in emissions from stationery sources as·sociated with growth. c. Urban form Describe projected development in terms of its ·continuation or alterati.on of existing urban form. 2. Water quality a. Water supply Projected improvements in water supply from State Water Project and effect on ·water use. b. Wastewater generation Discuss possible trends i'n wastewater generation per capita an~ commer~ial and industrial flows and loadings. 3. Energy Discuss energy demand an~ conservation and how it will be affected by future development or design factors. Impacts of producing this energy. 4. Social -and economic factors Discuss need for open space, future recreation, .tax rates, schools, employment,,and generalized consequences of growth. VIII. SUMMARY OF FUNCTIONAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF ALTERNATIVES Develop a rating matrix and show the relative ranking for the various factors for each alternative. AGENDA ITEM #8(b) ·c-9 ALL DISTRICTS 8 ~ IX. PRIMARY IMPACTS OF SELECTED ALTERNATIVES Refinement and additional asssessment of impacts described in Chapter V for selected alternative. X. SECONDARY IMPACTS OF SELECTED ALTERNATIVES A. Growth-Inducing Impact 1. Population 2. Housing . 3. Commercial/industrial 4. Transportation B. Air Quality \ . 1. Project emissinns for added growth for sefvice area and reductions on a regional scale from Implementation Plan. 2. Relationship between land use and air quality. Discuss density and transportation fac~ors and land use. C. Social and Economic Impacts Describe impact from not supplying additional capacity for planned growth. Discus~ funding options and their economic impact on tax rates. Discuss economic impacts of pollution and its abatement. D. Potential Mitigation Measures 1. Air pollution Discuss additional emissions controls that may· be required. 2. Alteration of land use and urban form Discuss sprawl vs. high dens~ty development, downtown redevelopment, and their relationship to environmental quality. 3. Transportation controls Discuss VMT reduction measures, prov1s1on of forms of transportation other ·than private auto- mobile, carpooling, bicycles, local employment. AGENDA ITEM #8(b) C-10 ALL DISTRICTS 9 4. Restrictions on new utility connections Discuss possible connection restrictions ·and their impact on the environment. XI. UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS XII. MITIGATION MEASURES A. Primary Impacts Construction, water·quality. B. Secondary Impacts Land us~, air quality. XIII. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL SHORT-TERM USES AND LONG- TERM PRODUCTIVITY XIV. IRREVERSIBL~ ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES XV. GROWTH-INDUCING IMPACT AGENDA ITEM #8(b) C-11 ALL·DISTRICTS- Chapter ATTACHMENT B ESTIMATE OF WORK EFFORT Part I -Background Chapter I Chapter I I Chapter I I I Chapter IV Manweeks 2 4 4 3 Part II -Wastewater Management Program Chapter v 3 Chapter v.r 6 Chapter VI I 4 Chapter VI I I k 2 Chapter IX 3 Chapter x 3 Chapter XI ~ Chapter XI I 2 Chapter XI I I} Chapter XIV 1 Chapter xv Total Estimate 36 manweeks 9 months This is a general estimate of work effort and does n6t include contingencies~ travel and meetings, all of which' are estimated to be within the i.nitial limiting fee. or AGENDA ITEM #8(b) C-12 ALL DISTRICTS ATTACHMENT C AREAS OF EMPHASIS AND SCOPE OF SIGNIFICANT ITEMS Because of the changing State and Federal requirements and the difficulty of anticipating the types ·of responses that wi 11 be generated during the preparation of the Ora ft. Document .and i n i ts rev i e w , i t i s . poss i bl e that· the presently anti c i pated scope of the docu~ent will be altered. To assur~ a clear definition of the intial scope of work as de~cribed in Attachment A, the following specific report items have been defined. We believe that the scope as contemplated is adequate to meet State and Federal requirements. Air Quality It is anticipated that the air quality discussion for the OCSD EIS will be similar to that prepared by EPA for t~e Aliso wastewater management program .. This EIS identifies the present and projected level of air pollutant concentrations and dis- cusses in general terms possible mitigation measures in terms_ of transportation and land usE alterations. Recently, particularly in Northern California, EPA has. required separate new analyses of existing and possible air quality through use of predictive models. Also included in these ~tudies has been a detailed land use and transpor~ation analysis recommending specific measures for each local area. These latter two studies are not included in the proposed EIS. Recent discussions with the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts indicate that EPA has advised them that separate air quality analyses are to be made for each waste w a t er agency i n the South C.o as ta ,l Are a despite the interrelationship between air quality effects in the service areas of each agency. Workshop and Public Participation· Included in the scripe of work are one workshop session and , participation on the hearing on the Draft EIR. It is a~sumed that the District would provide mailings for the workshop session and hearing, arrange for scheduling and the notice, and act as contact regarding this program. Plans for Los Angeles County San i tat i on Di st r i ct s are for seven· workshop s es s ions a n d this level of effort is substantially higher than is presently planned for the Orange ·county program. AGENDA ITEM #8(b) C-13 ALL DISTRICTS Ma r i n e S tu ·d i e s The approach will be to summarize and evaluate all of the studies that have been conducted by the Districts, the South Coastal Water Research Project, and other studies to assure that all available information on treatment level and discharge effects on the ocean is presented. It is possible that during the course of report preparation or public participation that detailed technical tssues will be raised ·which maj require either special subconsultants in the field of marine biology or the. development or presentation of data in a new way. · E PA C o· o r d i n a t i o n The level of effort required to provide EPA with progress reports and assure their full participation in the development of the EIS depends to a great extent on the approach of the particular evaluator on EPA's staff. The level of effort ass.urned for the EIS has .been to provide actual drafts of chap.ters as they are prepared and .to meet occasionally to review drafts and study emphasis on several occasions during the preparation of the report. In several ·other instances, EPA has actually participated in day-to-day editorial sessions lasting for as much as 7 to 10 mandays. This· level of review session effort is not included in the Districts' scope. Interceptor Sewers Based on discussions with EPA and the District, it is·~ssumed that the EIS will summarize previous stud.ies of the impacts of interceptor sewers, particularly·the Santa Ana River Interceptor, and not include the secondary air quality effects or the growth-. i n d u·c i n g effects of . ext ens ·i on s o f s er vi c e i n spec i f i c are a s . The growth inducement to the extent that it is affected by.the. provision of additional treatment capacity is required to be studied as part of the scope of the report. · Review or Data Receipt Delays The work effort described in Attachment B assumes -timely response by the District and EPA in the review of draft sections and in the provision of detailed information. Should r~ceipt of this information· be delayed beyond approximately two weeks in each case, this will affect the completion schedule and may require additional work effort. AGENDA ITEM #8(b) C-14 ALL DISTRICTS EXHIBIT D PROFESSIONAL FEES Compensation for labor and expenses shall be made. in accordance with the following: · A. A fee based on the actual time engaged in the work set forth in Section 2 of this Agreement, and in ac~ordance'with the following rates: Classification President Vice President Senior· Engineer Environmental Speciali.st II Associate Engineer Environmental Specialist I Assistant Engineer Junior Engineer Senior Draftsman Draftsman Secretary Typist Hourly Rate Before July 1 After July 1 50.00 40.00 33.00 26.00 25.00 21 . 00 21 . 00 18.00 1.7.00 13.00 12.00 9.00 55.00 45.00 36.00 29.00 27.50 23.00 23.00 20.00 19.00 14.50 13.00 .,.o.oo B. An amount determined by multiplying the actual costs by a factor of 1 .2, which allows for overhead, for the fol·lowing: 1. Rental of equipment. 2. Direct travel expenses such as air, bus, and taxi, and automobile mileage at 15 cents per mile. 3. Identifiable communication. expenses such as long distance telephone calls, telegraph, and cable. 4 .. Identifiable reproduction costs such as printing of drawings, photostats, multilith printing, and binding. 5. Other similar direct nonsalary costs such as expendable s u p p 1 i e s no t a p p 1 i c a b 1 e t o · g e n e r a 1 o v e r h e a d . 6. All direct expenses for subsjstence and lodging. AGENDA ITEM #8(b) C-15 ALL DISTRICTS C. Subsequent to prior specific authorization by the Districts, an amount determined by multiplying the actual costs by a factor of 1 .2, whi·ch allows for overhead, for consulting and special technical services performed by others . • AGENDA ITEM #8(b) C-16 ALL DISTRICTS RESOLUTION NO. 75-46 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH J. B. GILBERT AND ASSOCIATES FOR FACILITIES PLAN EIS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGF.EEMENT WITH J,, B. GII.~BERT AND ASSOCIATES FOR PREPARATION OF ENVIRON- MENTAL IMPACT STA~EMENT RE .TREATMENT PLANT FACILITIES PLAN * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1., 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated , ~~--~~~~~~ by and.between County Sanitation Districts Nos.· l; 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and· 11 of.Orange County and J: B. Gilbert and Associates, for preparation of an Environmental Impact·Statement in connection with Districts' Treatment Plant Facilities Plan, is hereby a'pproved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby a.uthorized, .on a per diem fee basis, for a total amount not to .exceed $60, 000. 00; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3., 5, 6, 7, and 11, in form approved by the General Counselo PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held March 26, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #8(b) -D-ALL· DISTRICTS Attn: Mr. Ray E. Lewis ·>1:.. JOHN CAROLLO. ENGINEERS '' '\. . PHOENIX " '-ARIZONA JOHN A. CAROLLO, P.E. < U~06°1971 > H. HARVEY HUNT, P.E. HOWARD M. WAY, P.E. ROBERT G. WILLIAMS, P.E. DONALD R. PREISLER, P.E. GAIL P. LYNCH. P.E. WALNUT CREEK CALIFORNIA Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Distric~s of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 SANTA ANA CALIFORNIA WALNUT CREEK PLAZA, SUITE 750 1990 NORTH CALIFORNIA BLVD. WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 9,4~95 AREA CODE: !415> 932-1710 March 17, 1975 Subject: Consultation -Wastewater Treatm.ent by Activated Carbon-Pyrolytic Method Thank you for your July 17, 1974, letter wherein you indicated that our firm had been designated to furnish technical services in connection with the subject project. This letter constitutes our proposal to furnish those engineering services you desire relative to consultation, testing, evaluating, design, and start-up of pilot plant and required reports for the subject project. SCOPE OF WORK Our firm would primarily be responsible. for site selection and preparation of plans and specifications for the full scale pilot plant. We would also assist in development of information for use in the Facilities Plan and in development of a final report on the process and its applicability for use by County Sanitation Districts of Orange County at Plant No. 2. We would also be involved with other phases of the work as directed by you. This proposal incorporates a scope of work including but not necessarily limited to the following: We will furnish technically trained people to perform any or all of the following engineering tasks: 1. Confer and meet with County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Staff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory repre.sentatives and other contract support consultants in fulfilling re- quirements of the tasks as outlined in the Plan of Study. (July 15, 19 7 4) 2. Compile and review information obtained from previous literatur.e search of existing carbon treatrrient and .pyrolysis reduction uni.ts. 3. Visit and evaluate in conjunction with Jet Propulsiori. AGENDA ITEM #8(c) Laboratory and County Sanitation Districts of Orange Coun_ty personnel, similar installations that may be relevant to the project. Prepare report on findings. E-1 ALL DISTRICTS Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County · March 17, 1975 Page 2 4. Confer and consult with the Districts' staff and representatives of Jet Propulsion Laboratory in evaluation of pyrolysis test wo_rk to be a·ccomplished prior to and during design of the pilot pyrolysis reactor. · 5. Assist in the evaluation of the test data obtained from the experimental 10, 000 gallons per day unit. 6. Assist in the development of information and criteria relative to the JPL Process to be included in the Facilities Plan. This to include cost effectiveness analysis based on results of 10, 000 gpm unit. Prepar?-tidn of the Facilities Plan to be accomplished under a sepel:rate contract. 7. Confer with the Districts' staff and select a site at Plant No. 2 for the. location of the full scale pilot unit. 8. Confer and consllit with Districts' staff and representatives of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) to establish the process design criteria for full scale pilot plant. 9. Complete plans and specifications for the construction of the full scale pilot facility. Description of Pilot Facility as now contemplated: ·it is anticipated that this facility will have the capability to treat 1 MGD utilizing· activated carbon for removal of suspended and dissolved solids and include a pyrolysis reactor for conversion of the carbon sludge to activated carbon; multiple sludge dewatering devices for optimizing sludge dewatering techniques prior t.o pyrolysis; multiple filtration -µnits for optimizing, polishing of the effluent. The filter media to be utilized in the later units to be determined by test work which would proce-ed during final design. Investigate utilization of existing equipment in pilot plant to expedite early completion. · J?repare detailed fabric~tion drawings as required and utilize multiple contracts to provide ''fast track" during design and construction phases of pilot plant. AGENDA ITEM #8(c) E-2 ALL DISTRICTS Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County March 17, 1975 Page 3 10. Assist in obtaining bids ~s required for construction and installation of the full scale pilot unit and consult to Districts as required during construction of pilot unit. . 11. Assist Districts as required in start-up of full scale pilot unit. lZ. Consult to Districts during operation of full scale pilot unit. Observe operation and assist in evaluation of operational results. 13. Assist in the preparation of a final report setting forth cost effectiveness of process based on full scale pilot. unit as compared to other pr.ocesses .. SCHEDULE AND MANPOWER We have based this proposal on the-suggested work schedule dated July 24, 1974, which was discussed with Mr. Ray Lewis. It is anticipated that this schedule will be updated and refined· as the project proceeds and our manpower will be allocated to suit the r~sed schedule. Initially, we anticipate a 60 day effort to develop design criteria and select the plant site. Attached is a proposed manpower chart showing required personnel and the anticipated schedule for accomplishing the work. We anticipate completion of design of the full scale pilot facility by January, 1976. We have basically broken the work into two phases and. have estimated the manpower required for John Carollo Engineers by Phase as follows: · · · Phase Phase I Phase II ·FEE Description Evaluate 10, 000 GPD Unit and prepare plans and specifications for full scale pilot unit. Operation and evaluation of full scale pilot unit and final report. ' Manpower Estimate 85%+ 15%+ We propose to accomplish the tasks outlined above under Scope of Work on a per diem basis in accordance with our standard Fee Schedule. AGENDA ITEM #8(c) E-3 ALL DISTRICTS Mr. Fred A. Ha.rper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County March 17, 1975 Page 4 A copy of our current Fee Schedule is _attached. Since the Scope of Work and Schedule will be subject to revision as a definitive scope of work is set and as the project develops we suggest $300, 000 be used for budget purposes in defining our portion of the work. We suggest $255, 000 for Phase I tasks. We suggest that payments be made monthly, based on actual time spent during the p_revious month, with 10% retention of saiq payments until completion of the pilot plant plans and specifications, with the retained 10% being payable upon completion and submittal to the Districts of pilot plant plans and specifications. We suggest payment in full on a monthly basis for all work ·required following completion of the pilot plant de sign. If the project should be terminated by the Districts at any time, we request that all retained amounts be paid within one month~ The above per diem rates would cover our overhead, telephone, miscellaneous, printing, etc. Printing of the final report and plans and specifications would be accomplished by the Districts. Ar_y outside '-"" services which may be required and a.re authorized by the Districts would be billed at our cost, plus lOo/o. Cost of tra1rel and subsistence required and authorized by the Districts except travel from our offices to the Districts' office would be billed at our cost. We thank you for the opportunity of presenting this proposal. Very truly yours, HHH:kb Attachment , . AGENDA ITEM #8(c) E-4 ALL DISTRICTS JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FEE SCHEDULE TITLE RATE PER HOUR Partner $ 36.50 Head Engineer 35.00 Project.Engineer 31.00 Senior Engineer 28.00 Engineer 26.50 Associate Engineer 24.50 Assistant Engineer 22.50 Junior Engineer 20 .. 50 Senior Designer 18.50 Designer 16.20 ~ Senior Draftsman 14.00 Draftsman 12.00 Junior Draftsman 10.20 Clerical 12.00 Typist 10.00 This schedule is subject to ~hange on May 15, 1975. I• AGENDA ITEM #8(c) E-5 ALL. DISTRICTS RESOLUTION NO. 75-47 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN SERVICES RE JPL PILOT PLANT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,.APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES RE DESIGN OF JPL PILOT PLANT * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 pf Orange County, California, DO HEREBY "RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated ~~~~~~~~ by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos~ 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County and John Carollo Engineers, for engineering services in connection with design of reactivated carbon wastewater treatment plant pilot project, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized, on a per diem fee basis, for a total amount not to exceed $255,000.00; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized to execute said agreement· on behalf of itself and 'Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, in form -approved by the ·General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held March 26, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #8(c) -F-ALL.DISTRICTS • JET PHOPl'l.S10N 1..\BOICATOIC'\ c,,f1/11111it1/11.,1i11i11·11{ Tnl11111l11p,\' • .f,,·1111 <Joh r.1111•1: J>rii-1·, /'1111111<'1111, <:11lif11111i11 1111111 Sanitation District of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Foun~ain Valley, California Attention: Mr. Ray Lewis Chief Engineer Gentlemen: 92708 March 19, 1975 Refer tri: 601-CHT:sw JPL Proposal No. 51-354A Subject: Revised Proposal for an Activated Carbon Treatment Pilot Plant Scale-Up In accordance with recent discussions between personnel of our respective organizations, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory of the California Institute of Technology is pleased to submit six (6) copies of a revised proposal for further refining a wastewater treatment process and development of design criteria foi full scale implementation of an activated c~rbon treatment pilot plant. It is understood that the County will assume the principal role in the proposed project and ~hat JPL.will assist in a supporting role and provide technical assistance in the continuing development of the activated'carbon wastewater treatment process. Contractual arrangements for the performance of this work by the Laboratory may be accomplished in accordance with the section of the proposal titled "Proposed Contractual Arrangements·." 1°11'....: JI 1-././'1-:!/5/ AGENDA ITEM #8(d) G-1 ALL DISTRICTS JET PHOPULSION LABOHATOHY California Iustitute of Trr/1110/ogy • 4800 Oak Grove Drille, Pasndwn, California 91 /OJ R. Lewis -2- MAR 19 1975 In the event that your staff has questions concerning the technical aspects of this proposal, please contact Mr. Patrick Rygh, the proposed JPL ·Program Manager at (213) 354-4434, or Mr. Richard A. Swart of the JPL Contracts Management Office at (213) 354-3670 for contractual matters. Enclosures cc: E. F. Morris, NaPO NASA-KT (2) AGENDA ITEM #8(d) ,, G-2 Sincerely, For Jet Propulsion Laboratory ~ . . -t~~rf (I idr::/::11:t;_ Deputy Director ».:::;:_n3l~hnology Donald R. Fovl'.er ~~ Assistant to the Vice President ·for Business Affairs ALL DISTRICTS .. --- JPL Proposal No. 51-354A • Proposal to County Sanitation Districts of Orange County From California Institute of Technology Jet Propulsion Laboratory 4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena, California 91103 for ' An Activated Carbon Treatment Pilot Plant Scale-Up Amount Requested: Program Manager: Title: . Department Affiliation: Duration: Requested Start Date: Telephone: AGENDA ITEM #8(d) ,, ·G-3 $280,000. Mr. Patrick J. Rygh Senior Technical Manager Civil Systems Six (6) Months April, 1975 (213) 354-4Lf34 ALL DISTRICTS I Introduction Under the sponsorship of the National Aeronautics and Space Administra- tion (NASA), the Jet Propul~ion Laboratory (JPL) has been operating a pilot plant and evaluating an innovative wastewater treatment process under a . . cooperative working agreement with the County Sanitation· Districts of Orange County (CSDOC). The process utilizes an activ?ted carbon char produced by the pyrolysis of sewage. solids to treat the wastewater stream anc\ achieves a degree of treatment equal to or better than the best available conventional secondary treatment systems. Statement of Work As a result of the encouraging experimental work t9 .date, CSDOC intends to apply for an Environmental Protection Ageney (EPA) Step 1 construction grant to further refine the process for the d·evelopment of design criteria • for possible full-scale implementation. This effort will include the esta- blishment of design c~iteria and performance estimates from which the design of a million gallon a day (MGD) size demonstration facility can be formulated. It is understood that CSDOC will be the applicant and will assume the . . role and responsibilities of the lead agency. JPL will assist CSDOC in a supporting role and provide technical assistance in the continuing development of the activated carbon wastewater treatment process. The specific tasks in which JPL will be involved are preliminary design, I' equipment selection, reactor design, final plans and specifications, cost effectiveness, analysis, and project report preparation. Schedule The scope of the work will entail approximately six (6) months of effort. AGENDA ITEM #8(d) G-4 ALL DISTRICTS . . ~ -2-. Reporting A brief final letter report will be prepared at the completion of the work. Other reporting will be done as requested by CSDOC. . . Program Management Overall program cognizance is vested in the Environmental Systems Off ice of the Civil Systems Program Off ice. The Civil Systems Program Off ice is responsible for applying.space-derived capabilities to the solution or sup- port of non-space programs which are of critical importance and involve national interests •. Mr. Patrick Rygh, of the Civil Systems Office, will have overall program.responsibility of the effort herein proposed. Dr. John Kalvi~skas will have the overall task responsibility. The task force sup- port.ing project operations will include knowledgeable pers·onnel who have gained firsthand experience in the development and operation of the unique JPL wastewater treatment process· with on-site tests at CSDOC. Cost Estimate Direct Labor (37 mm) Travel Equipment Documentation " Procurements (outside services) Total Direct Cost Direct Labor Burden @ 102.1% General Burden @ 10.9% TOTAL COSTS: Proposed Contractual Arrangements $ 90,000. 700. . 3' 000. 5,000. 71,000. '$169,700. 91,900. 1s,4oo: $280,000. The California Institute of Techn~logy (Caltech) is a private non-prof it educational institution chartered under the laws of the State of California. AGENDA ITEM #8(d) G-5 ALL.DISTRICTS. -3- The Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) is· Government owned and is operated by Caltech under Contract NAS7-100 with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Under the existing contr~ct between Caltech and NASA~ all costs incurred are billed to the Government on a 100 percent reimbursable basis under a Cost Reimbursable Educational Institution type contract. The costs to be charged to the propose~ work would be consistent with contractual provisions and es~ablished procedures for costing of the current .contract between NASA and Caltech. All charges developed at the Laboratory, including JPL applied burdens, are billed to the Government as a direct charge. Government audit is performed on a continuing basis by a Department of Defense. Contract Audit Agency resident team. In accordance with current procedures between NASA and Caltech/JPL, funding of th~ California I~stit~te of Technology,, Jet Propulsion .Laboratory for the effort may be accomplished as follows: The County Sanitation Dis- tricts of Orange County (CSDOC) can issue a ~urchase order or other reim- bursa~le agreement to the NASA Contracting Officer for Contract NAS7-100. The order should be addressed as follows: NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION NASA Pasadena Off ice 4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena, California 91103 Attention: Mr. Edward F. Morris Contracting Officer Mr. Morris may be contacted at (213) 354-6050. The order may include a Statement of Work applicable to the work to be performed by JPL, but the usual commercial terms and conditions and other special conditions must be deleted since the work will be performed under the AGENDA ITEM #8(d) G-6 ALL· DISTRICTS -4--.. ... . .• "-""' terms and ~onditions of Contract NAS7-100. The order should also reference JPL's proposal·number and date. The above contractual arrangement will permit the addition of a task order to Contract NAS7-100 for :xisting programs at JPL, specifying the work • to be performed for CSDOC. Responsibility and. authority in the technical direction of this effort will remain with CSDOC. JPL has recently and is currently performing work under the above des- cribed contractual arrangements for numerous Federal agencies; the State of California, the State Water Resources Control Board, the County of San Diego, Environmental Devel9pment Agency, the Comprehensive Health ·Planning Council of Los Angeles County,' and the cities of Los Angeles and Pasadena. ,, I• AGENDA ITEM #8(d) G-7 ALL DISTRICTS RESOLUTION NO. 75-48 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH CAL TECH~ (JPL) RE PILOT PLANT SERVICES A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, · APPOVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, JET PROPULSION LABORA'I10RY, FOR SERVICES RE. JPL REACTIVATED CARBON PILOT PLANT.PROJECT * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2; 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That· the certain agreement dated , --~-----~-------~ by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County and California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, f~r services in connection with the JPL reactivated carbon wastewater treatment project, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2o That payment for said services is hereby authorized, on a per diem fee basis, for a total amount not to exceed $280,000.00; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held March 26, 1975. · AGENDA ITEM #8(d) -H-ALL DISTRICTS .. VALUATION CONSULTANTS• REAL ESTATE COUNSELOHS tm:rn.1 sj March 20, 1975 S £.CODD£. SR. MAI (1888 • 19721 S. £ CODDE. JR. MAI G E SCHMITZ. MAI Mr. Raymond Eo Lewis Chief Engineer Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,, CA 92708 RE: Orange County Sanitation Districts Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer Right-of-Way Appraisal Dear Mr. Lewis: At your r'equest we have examined the documents listed below for the purpose of establishing the scope of appraisal services required in connection with your proposed acquisition of right-of-way along the Southern Pacific Railroad,, between lrvine Boulevard and Fairhaven Avenue .in District No. 7. Maps of Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer Line • Reaches 11 and a portion of 12 Irvine Boulevard to Fairhaven Avenue February 1975,, Boyle Engineering (12 sheets). Map of Permanent and Temporary Easements for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer Prepared by Boyle Engineering, Drawing F-1421, Dated Jan. 1975. Our preliminary examination of the _project suggests that the best interest of · the District would be served by the preparation. of a preliminary letter report rather than a complete comprehensive appraisal raporto The three major reasons for this recommendation are cited qelow: 1. Economy and cost of projecto 2. This is a strategy frequently advised in condemnation matters of this type and character. 3. The market value of the easement right-of-way sought is very small as compared to the cost of the work required in accurately measuring the value and the assembly of good supporting datao If it later becomes necessary to revise the specifications of employment to include a complete detailed appraisal report, a second stage of preparation could be undertaken at the cost set forth on the following page as Phase Two. l f-;.; 0 L 5<'V('n tc:c·nth Stre(·t •Suite: 130. Santa Ano. Cali:o:: 1 !n0::7U l • Telcr·: :c: .>:· ( 7] .~ i ~:1 t: : ··~· ; • • AC;F.Nn l\ T"PF.M II'? 1 T -1 nT ~'T'RT r,rp 7 ' -. Mr.· Raymond E. Lewis . 2~·::~~· ~ . .;.:~'-'.·~ :;_;·~,: 'k.,-~r"1?y.1, .. :"" ·'71'' ·-. ' -·· "-., • jf,......J.# I I I I (....1, Page 2 ,?Pf_.--• ;:J:' ..................... / We are assuming certain guidelines for our proposed analysis, which are partly summarized as follows:· 1. Title policies will be furnished by the District. 2. Engineering data pertinent to the appraisal will be supplied by Boyle Engineering at no cost to Goode & Goode. ·3. The railroad usage is considered to be abandoned and facilities; including tracks, ties, and operational impacts; are to be disregarded· by the appraiser. We are prepared to perform these services upon the following basis: Phase One --Preliminary Appraisal Rate basis for services: Appraiser -$50 per hour Assistant -$2 5 p~r hour Maximum to ta 1 co st of ·Phase ·one: $ 7, 5 00 Phase Two • Comprehensive Appraisal Report Rate basis for services: (Same as Above) Maximum total cost of Phase Two: .$17, 500 Maximum Total Cost If Phases One & Two Are Tiequested: $2 5, 000 We are prepared to discuss this prdposal in furtl?-er detail at your convenience. sf Sincere Ir, . l __,_---- ~r / .. ~ .. .-. '···>~ ,10/" I t • , .': ~I, I I I Stanley. E./Goode, Jr., lVlAI-CRE AGENDA ITEM 1121 I-2 DISTRICT 7 RESOLUTION NO. 75-37 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF LICENSE TO OCCUPY RIGHT OF WAY WITH JACK R. FENTON AND WAYNE R. PETERSON, A PARTNERSHIP A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5,, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF LICENSE TO OCCUPY RIGHT OF WAY WITH JACK R. FENTON AND WAYNE R. PETERSON, A PARTNERSHIP * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boardsof Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. ~hat the certain License to Occupy Right of Way, dated March 12, 1975, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That County Sanitation District No. 1, as agent for itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, Californ~a,is hereby authorized and directed to enter into said agreement granting Jack R. Fenton and Wayne R. Peterson, a Partnership, right of way in the vicinity of Brookhurst Street, Hamil to~ Avenue and the Santa Ana River, for construction and mainten- ance of an asphalt parking lot 30.6 feet wide and 101.0 feet long; and, Section 3. That payment of an initial lump-sum fee in the amount of $50.00 plus $125 per annum payable yearly in advance for use of said right of way, is hereby authorized; and, I • Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said License to Occupy Right of Way, in form approved by the Districts' General Counsel. AGENDA ITEM #26 -J-DISTRICT 11 ... . . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 ~ r-ILCD 1084'4' ELLIS AVENUE l:i the Oflic~ of the Secrc:tary County S<:initotion District FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 927r (714') 540-2910 -~ No & 2 I \ S.,. II ... 'I ' (7J.4) 962-2411 ..... ~. ·j .. '0-,1C: o,:f:-, \ -. l..i ..) '· .... PROGRESS REPORT TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS P2-20 -POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT PLANT NO. 2 -($158,294) Districts taking over job at Contractor's request. Lighting fixtures installed. Transformer set in place. Two of the three motor control centers are installed. Contract approximately 95 percent complete to date. Pl-16 -46 MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 -($29,876,000) Major foundation work completed. Structural work continues in all areas. Aeration basin walk 70 percent complete. Placement of aerator top deck to begin this month. Blower building basement slab completed with walls and lower deck presently under way. Machinery dimension problems caused some delay in this area. Secondary clarifier slab on grade work continues and is estimated to be completed this month. Digester No. 9 -lower walls poured. No. 10 -lower walls to follow. Basement level and tunnels of digester control building in place. Garfield Avenue block wall and Ward Street improvements complete. PW-035 -ADDITIONAL BOILER FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2 -($39,047) Boiler in place .. I' Work certified complete. PW-039 -CHAIN LINK SECURITY FENCE AT EAST ENTRANCE, RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 - ($3,418.17) All work essentially complete. AGENDA ITEM #27 K-1 DISTRICT 11 • · .. ' Progress Report Treatment Plant Projects Page Two TREATMENT PLANT WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During February DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK Total Value Under·~ Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During February Total Work Under Design Total Work Out to Bid COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 $30,076,760 9,926,818 1,278,970 $17,683,037 9,571,030 528,220 10,568,340 551,257 (714) 962-2411 $30,076,760 $17,683,037 10,568,340 551,257 TOTAL AMOUNT UNDER CONTRACT, DESIGN, AWAITING AWARD AND OUT TO BID $62,418,594 March 6, 1975 I• AGENDA ITEM #27 K-2 DISTRICT 11 WARRANT NO •. 25243 25244 25245 25246 25247 25248 25249 25250 25251 25252 25253 25254 25255 25256 25257 25258 25259 25260 25261 25262 25263 25264 25265 25266 25267 25268 25269 25270 ·25271 25272 25273 25274 25275 25276 25277 25278 25279 25280 25281 25282 25283 25284 25285 25286 25287 25288 25289 25290 25291 25292 25293 25294 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Alex Fish Company, Ecological Research All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings, Couplings & Belts Alpine Aromatics, Inc., Odor Control Aljac Supply Co., Pipe Supplies American Backflow Co., Valve Parts American Soil Company, Lateral Repair Amoco Reinforced Plastics Co., Freight City of Anaheim, Power The Anchor Packing Co., Gaskets AMSA, Conference Registration Bancroft-Whitney Co., Government Codes Banning Battery Company, Batteries Barnes & Delaney, Conveyor Repair Bearing Specialty Company, Bearings Bell Pipe & Supply Company, Controls & Switches Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair Don Bogart, Employee Mileage Broadlicks Art Supply, Drafting Supplies CS Company, Valves & Freight Cal's Cameras, Photo Supplies & Processing Coast Insurance Agency, Insurance Premium Coast Towing, Towing Compressor Service, Compressor Parts Consolidated Electrical Distbrs., Electrical Supplies Constructor's Supply Co., Hardware Costa Mesa County Water District, Water Crest Leasing, Vehicle Lease Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplies ~larence S. Cumming~, Employee Mileage Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., ·Lab Supplies N. A. D'Arcy Company, Freight c. R. Davis Supply Co., Hardware Deaver Manufacturing Co., Equipment Repair John M. Deck Co., Equipment Parts De Guelle & Sons Glass Co., Glass Department of General Services, Technical Manuals Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling Dodge Truck, Inc., Truck Parts Ida L. Duesberg, Employee Mileage Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies & Printing Ecco Equipment Corp., Equipment Rental Enchanters Inc., Ocean Monitoring Enterprise Printing Company, Cover Stock Fischer & Porter Company, Pump Parts & Strip Charts William Fox, Employee Mileage GAF Corporation, Copier Repair Gasket Manufacturing Co., Inc., Gaskets General Electric Supply, Electric Supplies General Installation Co., Water Heater Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine Contract 1-1-75 General Telephone Company of Calif. Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage $ AMOUNT 159.0~ 423.59 1,060.00 178.61 251.77 675.00 141.40 56.64 71.02 100.00 45.82 156.62 193.33 ~48.24 230.44 38.00 21.00 17.74 531.35 315.98 59.00 35.00 72.95 1,252.72 193. r· 6.o~ 147.28 80.00 25.38 529.05 6.06 81.41 95.40 63.44 181.99 12.72 428.25 82.19 7.80 135.12 820.00 3,000.00 69.91 2,438.58 23.70 214.67 158.18 533.30 61J. 91 6,326.3r 3,111. 7-,- 33.90 AGENDA ITEM # 30 L-1 DISTRICT 11 WARRANT NO. 25295 25296 25297 5298 ~5299 25300 25301 25302 25303 25304 25305 25306 25307 25308 25309 25310 25311 25312 25313 25314 25315 25316 25317 25318 25319 25320 25321 25322 -~323 ~5324 25325 25326 25327 25328 25329 25330 25331 25332 25333 25334 25335 25336 25337 25338 25339 25340 25341 25342 25343 25344 25345 25346 25347 3348 ~349 IN FAVOR OF Graybar Electric Co., Electric Supplies $ Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Parts ; Hadley's Printing, Printing George T. Hall Co., Pump Parts Halsted & Hoggan, Pump Harbor Fire Protections, Inc., Fire Extinguisher Service Harrington Industrial Plastics, Pipe Supplies Harrisons & Crosf ield, Freight Hasty Lawn & Garden, Mower L. Heitman Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Rental Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires Honeywell, Inc., Strip Charts Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies, Tools & Hardware City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Equipment Rental Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware Irvine Ranch Water District, Water Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supplies King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, Bushings & Pipe Supplies Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware & Tools LBWS, Inc., W~lding Supplies, Hardware & Tools L & N Uniforms-Supply Co., Uniform,service The La.cal Company, Inc., Pump Packing Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Equipment Parts R. H. Landin Graphics, Printing Jim Lankford Company, Adapter Larsen-Hogue, Equipment Testing Judy Lee, Employee Mileage McKesson Chemical Co., JPL Chemicals McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Hardware Majestic Fasteners Company, Hardware Marden Susco, Tools Meter Master, Inc., Equipment Repair Charles Meriam Company, Metering Supplies E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers Morrison Company, Pipe Supplies J. Mosher, Employee Mileage N B Products, Pipe Supplies National Auto Glass, Truck Parts National Lumber Supply, Building Materials Newark Electronics, Tools City of Newport Beach, Water c. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel Fees Oakite Products, Inc., Cleaner Orange Coast Hardwood, Building Materials Orange Valve & ~itting Co., Hardware Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies Pacific Engineers, Piping Pacific Pipe Tool Co., Ladders Pacific Pumping Company, Pump Parts Pacific Telephone Company Parkwood Western Distribution, Hardware M. C. Patten Corporation, Controls AMOUNT 342.80 102.22 24.91 69.82 725.49 103.71 374.29 42.18 45.50 594.oo 429.08 118.95 40.19 526. 29 14.40 407.87 35.99 1.75 729.57 1,085.66 884.56 434 .50 130.32 1,574.60 479.17 1.34 301.04 23.32 178.55 28.26 818.06 79.15 39.23 42.87 72.12 156.76 186.45 106.93 28.62 969.79 77.33 30.63 234.94 672.08 2,079.90 139.92 112.02 96.68 316.67 834.60 706.07 79.23 344.48 63.07 140.01 AGENDA ITEM # 30 L-2 DISTRICT 11 WARRANT NO. 25350 25351 25352 25353 25354 25355 25356 25357 25358 25359 25360 25361 25362 25363 25364 25366 25367 25368 25369 25370 25371 25372 25373 25374 25375 25376 25377 25378 25379 25380 25381 25382 25383 25384 25385 25386 25387 25388 25389 25390 25391 25392 25393 251407 25395 25396 25397 25398 25399 25400 25401 25402 25403 25404 IN FAVOR OF Postmaster, Postage $ ; Preston Weed Control, Weed Killer Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal Terry Ramey, Employee Mileage The Register, Subscription Renewal Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Aluminum Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts & Freight Ruff's Saw Service, Saw Sharpening SGA Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Testing Supplies Saylor's Art & Engineering Supplies, Drafting Supplies Science Applications, Inc., Hazardous Waste Study Scientific Products, Lab Supplies Service Motor Parts, Engine Repair Sherwin Electric Service, Equipment Testing Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies John Sigler, Employee Mileage Signal-Flash Company, Barricade Rental Fred Sinasek, Employee Mileage Skil Corporation, Equipment Parts Smart & Final Iris Co., Supplies Southern California Edison Company South Orange Supply, Piping Supplies Southern California Gas Company Southern California Water Company Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Oil Company of Calif., Gasoline & Oil Sterling Art & Engineering Supply, Drafting Supplies 3un Electric Corporation, Equipment Repair Sunnen Products Co., Equipment Parts T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Parts Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage Technical Book Company, Technical Manuals Thomason Compressor Corp., Compressor Repair Margo Thoffison, Employee Mileage Tustin Water Works, Water Union Oil Company of Calif., Gasoline United Auto Parts, Truck Parts United Parcel Service, Freight-out United Reprographics, Inc., Printing United States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts Utilities Supply Company, Tools & Fire Extinguishers Patrick Vail, Employee Mileage Valvate Associates, Pump Parts Wall Street Journal, Subscription Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage John R. Waples, R. s., Odor Consultant Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts Whitney's Speedometer Service, Truck Repair World Travel Bureau, Inc., JPL Air Fare Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing AMOUNT 500.00 353.78 62.0' 59.1b-' 42.00 1,196.42 2,013.59 69.68 41.50 61.48 40.76 12.50 1,000.00 242.55 242.34 357.50 838.38 7.20 26.00 9.00 36.17 23.09 1,137.04 64.94 1,701.89 3.00 l00.0,.-- 451. 7lY 8,504.90 26.08 74.79 134.63 118 .83 46.62 26.66 70.00 7.50 35.16 107.42 299.40 14.52 66.62 1,666.71 558.57 25.86 140.89 37.96 27.30 47.10 220.80 931.51 7.6- 368.7~ 2,233.41 AGENDA ITEM #30 L".""3 DISTRICT 11 WARRANT NO. 25405 25406 25224 25225 25226 25227 25228 25229 25230 25231 25232 25233 25234 0 25235 25236 25237 25238 25239 ~5240 25241 25242 IN FAVOR OF Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Service . Zodiac Paper Company, Reproduction Supplies I TOTAL JOINT OPERATING CAPITAL OUTIAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF All Bearing Service, Inc., Tools John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services Clark Equipment Co., Forklift, A-076 County Sanitation Dist. 2 of L.A., Solids Study Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16 E.T.I. & Kordick, Retention Contract I-8-3 Forkert Engineering, Survey Pl-16 Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Mgmt. Pl-16 Industrial Indemnity Co., Contractor P2-20 Motorola, Inc., Communication Equipment Perkin Elmer Corp., Freight Porter Boiler Service, Inc., Contractor PW-035 Pyramid Fence Co., Contractor PW-039 Southern Calif. Testing Lab, Testing Pl-16 Spectra-Physics, Lab Equipment Tatkin Company, Metering Equipment .Testing Engineers, Inc., Testing Pl-16 J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Safety Equipment Twining Laboratories, Testing Pl-lo TOTAL CAPITAL OUTIAY REVOLVING TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF AGENDA ITEM #30 L-4 $ AMOUNT 1,320.55 85.52 $ 71,583.59 141.90 20,134.13 9,450.96 25,000.00 1,234,869.80 79,613.73 1,841.50 11,397.00 8,956.52 1,579.40 30.52 33,815.70 3,076.35 196.20 5,459.00 382.66 1,599.00 763.20 679.05 $1,438,986.62 $1,510,570.21 DISTRICT 11 March 6, 1975 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 927C\' (714) 540-2910 '-' (714) 962-2411 STAFF REPORT RE: REVISION OF ANNEXATION POLICIES AND FEES FOR DISTRICTS 2, 3, 7, and 11. On January 8, 1975, the Boards referred this matter back to the staff for further explanation. Districts 2 & 7 Presently, in Districts 2 and 7, the annexation fees are identical, $526. They are based on the 1965 and 1968 con- struction estimates for sewer facilities to s~rve annexable territories. Begihning in 1970, the two District Boards autho- rized an annual escalation to reflect EPA sewer construction cost index increases for the Los Angeles area, or a minimum annual increase of $10 per acre. District 3 District No. 3 currently has an annexation fee of $1016, which is the net worth per acre plus $150. With the exception of the U. S. Naval Weapons Station near Seal Beach, the District has only about 5 acres left to annex. District 11 District No. 11 adopted an annexation policy in 1963, which was based on an estimate of trunk sewer racilities to serve annexable property at that time. The annexation fee has remained at a con$tant figure, $66 per quarter acre,, which is equivalent to $264-.per acre. ~The net worth acreage fee at this time woulcl , l?~ ,$4.07 . District 5 On February 18th, the District 5 Board held an adjourned meeting and at that time reaffirmed its position to maintain its annexation fee. of $1017/acre, which is based on the net worth per acre of the District. It is the staff's recommendation that the Boards adopt a uniform annexation policy relative to annexation fees effective July 1, 1975, which is to be computed annually at the beginning of each fiscal year (July 1), based on the net worth of the Dis- trict divided by the acreage within the District. AGENDA ITEM #3l(a) M-1 DISTRICT 11 SUMMARY OF DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION POLICY Annexation Polley Resolution: Effective Date: Provision for Processing Fee: Basis of Annexation Fee: Current Annexation Fee: Provision for Escalating Annexation Fee Next Date Annexation Fee Escalates: Remarks: AGENDA ITEM #3l(a) M-2 69-17-2 3-12-67 All fees w/ $325 minimum r Based on 1965 Estimate of Sewer Facilities to serve annexable territory. Date paid governs fee $526/acre Beginning 1-1-70 escalated annually to reflect EPA Sewer Construction Cost Index for L.A. Area or minimum of $10/acre (October Index Used) 1-1-76 Net worth acreage fee would be $752 DISTRICT 11 SUMMARY OF DISTRICT NO. 3 ANNEXATION POLICY Annexation Policy Resolution: Effective Date: \. Provision for Processing Fee: Basis of Annexation Fee: Current Annexation Fee: Provision for Escalating Annexation Fee: Next Date Annexation Fee Escalates: Remarks: ,, AGENDA ITEM # 31( a) M-3 72-6-3 1-1-72 All fees w/ $325 minimum Net worth per acre of District plus $150. Date of Board approval governs fee $1016/acre Beginning 1-1-73 escalated annually based on net worth of District preceding June 30th plus $150 1-1-76 Net worth acreage fee would be $866 if $150 fee is' omitted. Recommend elimination of $150 fee I.' DISTRICT 11 \ SUMMARY OF DISTRICT NO. 7 ANNEXATION POLICY Annexation Poli9y Resolution: Effective Date: Provision for Processing Fee: Basis of Annexation Fee: Current Annexation Fee: Provision for Escalating Annexation Fee: Next Date Annexation Fee Escalates: Remarks: AGENDA ITEM #3l(a) M-4 68-88-7 10-9-68 All fees w/ $325 minimum Based on 1968 Estimate of Trunk Sewer Facilities to serve annexable territ9ry. Date paid governs fee $526/acre Beginning 1-1-70 escalated annually to reflect EPA Sewer Construction Cost Index for L.A. Area or minimum of $10/acre (October Index Used) 1-1-76 Net worth acreage fee would be $690 i ! DISTRICT 11 SUMMARY OF DISTRICT NO. 11 ANNEXATION POLICY Annexation Polioy Resolution: Effective Date: Provision for·Processing Fee: Basis of Annexation Fee: Current Annexation Fee: Provision for Escalating Annexation Fee: Next Date Annexation Fee Escalates: Remarks: AGENDA ITEM #3l(a) 64-136-11 10-1-63 None Based on 1964 Estimate of Trunk Sewer Facilities to serve annexable territqry $66 per 1/4 acre w/ $75 minimum. (Equivalent to $264/acre). None Net worth acreage fee would be $407. ~ Under current policj, have agreement with City of Huntington Beach to collect fees M-5 DISTRICT 11 RESOLUTION NO. 75-49-11 ESTABLISHING ANNEXATION POLICY A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING FEES AND PROCEDURES CONCERNING ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to establish certain requirements for territory seeking annexation to this District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the proponents of any application for annexa- tion of any territory to the District shall, as a condition to securing approval of the Board of Directors of the·District to such annexation, comply with the following: Requirements: (a) Payrrient of all costs incurred in processing the annexation. (b) From the period beginning March 13, 1975, and ending June 30, 1975,·payment to the District of the sum of $264 per acre of territory so annexed. Beginning July 1, 1975, and annually thereafter, the sum to be paid per acre for the ensuing 12 months will be the net worth per acre of the District on the preceding June 30th. The date of approval by the Board of Directors of the annexation shall govern the amount of the fee per acre hereinabove established. (c) That the annexed territory be subject to the terms and conditions of all ordinances pertaining to fees for connection to the District's facilities, and use of said facilities. AGENDA ITEM #3l(b) N-1 DISTRICT 11 (d) The annexed territory shall be annexed into an appropriate sewering agency, such as a city, for the purpose of maintaining and operating the local sewer system including pumping stations and force mains. (e) The territory, upon annexation, shall be subject to all ad valorem taxes required for the retirement of the existing and future bonds of the District. (f) Any area within the territory annexed shall be concurrently withdrawn from any Special District which has levied ad valorem taxes or other charges for the same services within the territory to be annexed that County Sanitation District No. 11 will provide following annexation, to avoid an overlapping taxing entity. Section 2. That the procedures for annexations of territory to the District shall be as set forth on Schedule "A" attached hereto ~ and made a part of this resolution, and the District's staff is hereby directed to give to the proponents of any proposed annexation a copy of Schedule "A" outlining the procedures to be followed. Section 3. · That the staff be directed to transmit to the Local Agency Formation Commission a certified copy of this resolution. Section 4. That the provisions of this resolution shall apply to any annexation of territory to the District i.nitiated on or after March 27, 1975. Section 5. That all other resolutions or ... otions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed and made of no further effect. AGENDA ITEM #3l(b) N-2 DISTRICT 11 RESOLUTION NO. 75-40-11 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO REMODEL NEWLAND-HAMILTON PUMPING STATION FACILITIES CONTRACT NO. ll-4R A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO REMODEL NEWLAND-HAMILTON PUMPING STATION FACILITIES, CONTRACT NO~ ll-4R I * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications, and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Keith & Associates, District's Engineers, for construction to REMODEL NEWLAHD-HAMILTON PUMPING STATION FACILITIES, CONTRACT NO. ll-4R, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m., --------, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 26, 1975. AGENDA ITEM # 32 -0-DISTRICT 11 Co.uNTY SANITATION D1sTRICTS ·of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA . P. 0. BOX 8127 108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71-4) 5.C0-2910 (71-4) 962-2411 IMPLEMENTATION OF TREATMENT FACILITIES FOR IMPROVED TREATMENT STAFF REPORT March 20, 1975 State and Federal Grant Programs The recent advent of the release of impounded Federal wastewater funds, coupled with the Governor's announcement to expedite the commitment of grant monies, has provided approximately $1.6 billion to the State of California for wastewater treatment facilities which must be committed for construction of facilities before September 30, 1977. This staff report summarizes the steps and procedures which must be taken in order that the Districts can receive approvals of a program to construct the needed facilities to meet the State and Federal.discharge requiremer.ts. In August, 1973, the Distric~s were directed by the State to prepare a Project Report for the purpose of providing advanced treatment at Plant. No. 2. This Report was prepared by the Districts' ?taff in conjunction with John Carollo Engineers and Richard Terry and Associates for a cost of approximately $127,000, and was submitted to the State for their review and comment on March 1, ~974. Since the submittal of this Report, the staff has diligently pursued commentary from the State and Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) staff to receive concept approval of the program contained in said Report. The delay in the concept approval from the State and EPA was probably predicated upon the introduction of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory's Activated Carbon Treatment.System (ACTS). The preliminary results from this JPL process indicate that not only.is there a potential of reducing the capital expenditures ·for improved treatment at Plant No. 2 from approximately $235 million to $100 to $120 million, but the operating and maintenance costs would also be substantially reduced. On May 15, 1974, the staff submitted an application for a Step I (Planning) Grant to develop the design criteria and the cost.effectiveness necessary to substantiate the feasibility of this JPL process. Since the submittal of this ·application, the staff has continually worked in meeting pre-grant conditions imposed by the State and EPA and on March 7, 1975, -the Step I Grant was received from the EPA for a total amount of $3.5 million. In order that the Districts can proceed on an implementation schedule to assure facilities approval from the monies to be allocated, if is essential that the Board take the following actions: le Approve a service contract with John Carollo Engineers to expand the 1974 Project Report for Plant No. 2 into a complete Facilities Plan as required by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. This Facilities Plan is a requirement and must be completed and approved before the State and EPA will authorize monies for construction of facilities. This Facilities Plan is in essence a Master Plan of all facilities (Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2) for the ultimate development of the Districts and the needs associated therewith. 2. Approve a contract for consulting services to J. B. Gilbert & Associates to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for all work proposed in the aforementioned Facilities Plan. The preparation of the EIS would normally be done by the EPA staff, but because of staff limitations, this ·effort has been assigned to the.Sanitation Districts. The prepar- ation of this EIS will be closely scrutinized by the EPA and the final report will appear under their authorship. · 3. Approve contracts with John Carollo Engineers. and the California Institute of Technology Jet Propulsion Laboratory to perform the necessary tasks for design and construction of the 1-MGD Pilot Plant for the JPL process. The Step I Grant does provide monies for this work, but said monies are conditioned that in the event the process does not prove to be a viable wastewater treatment process, then Grant participation will cease at the time this determination is made. These service contracts must be structured to incorporate this Grant provision. 4. ·It will also be necessary to authorize John Carollo Engineers to assist· in the evaluation of other treatment processes (activated sludge with oxygen and air) in order that the data obtained can be incorporated in the above-mentioned Faciliti~s Plan. The cost of the above-mentioned services are as outlined below: 1. Facilities Plan 2. E~vironmental Impact Statement 3. JPL Process A. Design 4. Conventional Process Pilot Plant A. Operation John· Carollo Engineers· J. B. Gilbert & Associates John Carollo Engineers Jet Propulsion Laboratory John Carollo Engineers SUBTOTAL $100,000 60,000 255,000 280,000 50,000 $745,000 87.5% GRANT FUNDING -651,875 DISTRICTS' SHARE $ 93,125 It is the staffs' op1n1on that a maximum effort must be given to determining the feasibility of the JPL process if it is to be considered a viable alternative for improved treatment facilities to meet ·our discharge requirements. IN ORDER TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR THE GRANT MONIES THAT MUST BE ALLOCATED BY SEPTEMBER 30, 1977, A DECISION ON THE TYPE OF PROCESS MUST BE MADE ON OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 1, 1976. ~L:hje ( I. DESCRIPTION Project Report for Improved Treatment at Plant #2, including EIR II. Development of JPL Process I II. . Step I Grant Planning C-06-1073-010 ( A. Facilities Plan B. EIS C •· JPL Process Pilot Plant 1. Design 2. Construct 3. Operate D. Conventional Process Pilot Plant Studies 1. Operation of oxygen process 2. Operation of air process IV. Step II Grant Design V. Step III Grant Construction UNIT COST $ 127,0001 ? 100,000- 100,000 60,000 700,000 1,610,000 828,000 ~0,000 25,000 * * 1 Included in $3.S million Step I Grant 2 Total allocation -not eligible for grant funding * Costs unknown at this time .~ •• P •I·.' 1973 ORANGE couNrY SANITATION DISTRICTS SCHEDULING FOR IMPROVED TREATMENT 1974 1975 1976 1977 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A· S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D -'IHIPA tu: r;-ri: D , L B '~F.S' IN, -~ ... lliiAiillliiiiPLiii'._.F .. R._.' _.T .. E.,_.I_.G...,.ttlNiiiT._...,=• :, ei • ed Gr< nt Of er Mai ch 7, 19; 5) F. Cil IT ES PLAi'J -Els I Dl SI1 N . .... I 01\ TR' CT BI Mn! THl Y 1 ROC RE' S I EPllRT~ 'R" I OAl~S OF jDI.JlEC1'0R: UJ u ...... > ~ (/) UJ .._ Vl u C:( UJ ~ N 1-,_. z ~o .0 u :c I- ::> <( ... nn1 '-.OPl ... !nA,'l'J:' . j . . - (f) 0 U"I UJ UJ 1-u u 0 UJ ~ ....J 0.. UJ (f) 1-z UJ UJ co :L I-I- <( (f) w :::> ~ L I- l i I I (f) 0 5 LL '. 0 Ll.! ,_::) z ~( I ::> -· I 0 :.c.: I I CL a.. I :L G> I -, LL I ~ ·-1 I z _J I 0 <( I -u ....J l ....J >--CJ' i co l.O 81 I I-' ....... <( i ~IU ~ 0' I ....I I _J i Ir-.. <..{: I r-.. ! CT> UJ '. ....... CO I I I-I 0 If>' i "" ::> :L ~ UJ co :L : lll I I- 0.. I UJ If> ! I ~ i I i I I ! I ' U.S. ENVIRONMCNTAL PROTECTION AGENCY GRANT AGREEMENT (See instructions be/or<! compl<'ting form.) FORM APPnovi:o OMA NO. 1!111•HOrJH7 GRANT NO •. c 061073 01 21 0 NOTE: The Grant Agrecr:ncnt must be completed in dupiicate and returned to the Grants Admini~tration Divi'lion for Headqtoarter'I J!rant awards and to the Grants Administration Branclu~s for State and local a~sistancc p.rant awards within 3 weeks after receipt or within any extension of time as may be E?rantcd by EPA. f.wcpt as mJy be otherwise provided, no costs may be incurred prior to the execution of the Grant Agreement by parties thereto. Receipt of a written refusal, failure to return the properly executed document within the prescribed·time, will romlt in tin: automatic termination of consideration of the r,rant offer by the A~ency. Any amendment to the Grant Af?reemeot by the grantee subsequent to the document being signed by the Award Official shall void the Grant Agreement. PARTI GENERAL INFORMATION 1. GRANT AOMIN IST RATION DATA 2 APPROPRIATION AND ACCOUNTING DATA A, STATUTE REFERENCE I B. R~GU~OTl~FR~F~~NCE A. A P.P R 0 F RI A T 1 0 N '..i. A C C 0 U ~. T N :.JI .-1 :3 L R PL 92-500 68X0103 P364092BV2 C.GRANT PRC(;RAM C: CEIJf"C T CL ASS COOE.. D. COMMITMENT .N 1JMOER Construction Gran ts 41.11 r'ClO 11 H 3 .. AWARD APPROVAL OFFICE 4 ISSUING OFFICE A. ORGANIZATION A. 01;GANIZATION Regional Administrator Grants Manaqement Branch 0. ADDRESS ::: ACf)PESS ·Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Protection Agency 100 California Street 100 California Street San Francisco CA 94111 San Francisco CA 94111 s. PROJECT OFFICER ff.'etlc1-.1/ Co11tact) A. NAME r.;. AC:::>RE.55 Fred Kreiqer Environmental Protection Agency O. Tl TL F. Pro;ect Evaluator 100 California Street C. TELEPHONE NlJP.,18CR (/111 l11dt• ltr,•u (out': San Francisco CA 94lll ( 4 15 )ss6-2005 6. GRANTEE ORGANIZATION A. NAME ::>. AL•'RL:SS Orange coiinty Sanitation District P.O. ilox·8127 Fol.intain Valley CA 92708 7. ·PROJECT MANAGER rr;ri.J11tc<! Cn11tacr1 A. NAME -· tiL~.'~LSS ~ Rav Lewis ~ P.O. Box 8127 .E:. 'l. l I l LI· Fountain Valley CA 92708 Chief 1.:ncrinear C. TF.:LEPHO•-JE NUMDE;R l/11</11d1• Art•:1 <" ''•"' 1"71.d\ i;.H1-?Q10 -8 .. AMOUNT 9 01..iflAT IOt~ A. Ar>PRO ·,":C GRANT AMOUNT• 1/1,. 1 .. r.,J A .t.. ;._ f" r; 0 V !:: [) 3 lJ D:::; ,-T ~· !; Fir 0 [; "l'l''"l'<'t/ 1~ri111t ;1mn11r1I ,,f l'1irl I. 8 .(11) .-1 •• ,;1 ,,,. 1•1111;1/ to tl11• lotnl Uf>f>rt)Vt'tl 1~runt nm"""' ul Pnrr If,) ~ ? -G.2.5_,J)_Q_Q_ N /'A - ~. 'INF XPENl!FD PRIOR vn. f'\ALAl'ICF El. L5Tl~ATF.O 3UDGET PFfllOC C. CURfil'NT YEAR OOL.IC.ATION D. £ST IM A T E (' P R 0 J E C T C 0 S T ~ 1. r;on _ nno '!'o': ~ 'I -, -, ---fl -, . PAYEE 10. PAYME.NT ~AETHOD A .. I":. ·-I~ RC IM ll LI R 5 l M r: N T . A ':>VANC '' . ·-ni r.",...t-nr of Ej nn1'\~~ I J 01 liLR :. ·' • I •· !._ '. ~ •, 10844 .Lllis Ave •. Fountain Valley CA 92708 EPA Form 5700-20 (10-71) ;,1 r, .\Ct~"" .·.Pc;, .... A. ':.r .::A·l'•· .. ... ~. "·!' ;-'.)t 1 1 . •• • • -; • 1 .1 ~· • . •., 1 i 5. 1 ~ " } A ,.,.. o r'4 /\ J.:• C A I ..... -' . . ..... 1 I :.... t. ,, I l ~ r i I I ' PART II ' P£'.RSONNt.::L APPROVED BUOGET TASL;:. ,, . COST Cl\TE(;cmv CLM1SlrlCATION ( f\'011-.· J11., tr11c t 1011J 2 • F H 1 ~~ G E f' L 1-J c r 1 1 s ~· 1 HA. V EL 4. l:f.JUIPMF.NT r, C 0 N TR AC TU A L P E A :;O '>I AL S E ~ VI C CS APF'ROvr::o ALLOWABLE 8 LIDGE T PE~ 100 COST FORM APPil' v I"~ OM B NO. ! ""ld~tiOll 7 APPROVf:O GRANT AMOUNT --~·~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-1-~~~~~~~~~--~~+-~~~~~~~~~~~-1 7, CONSTRUCTION 8. OTHER 9. TOTAL OIFH:CT COST!; 10. IN 01 REC T C 05 r S I~ AT i: ? A:-:-' .. 11. TOTAL (Slwrt•. TABLE B -PROGIL'.,1'1 f.LEMFNT CLASSIFICATION 1'.\' \Jll•1.'1J{l. ... (rllt. I h.lll) 1. ·2. 4. 6 7. 9. 1 o. 11. TABLE C -PROGRAM E.~ C·'!-':NT C.:LASSIFICATION ( l . 'I ~ .... •; I J • 1 , ; : 1 ) 3.500.000 2_.;?~_nnn r:OlJIPM l:.N 1 I N I> I f~ E C l C (J S T 3 TOTALS · ~''·"" /. i. :IJ.!)_ 3,soo.ooo 2 r6 2.5 .aoo NOTF: Thl' l'O'>t share apCl'llll'J11 ,l·t i,•rt11 m thl· ,1111_1,·,·t d,il"llllll'lll sh.ii: !•. ap~'l1l-;1bk to the total of all cost l.';it~gory/propllll clement d.i~sific.itions only. t-~~~~~~~~.;;,_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--~-·~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--~--~~ P.A.RT 111 OFFER AND ACCEP"iANCE The l:nitcd S1;1t.·~ 11f ·\1ncm·a. ,1; ·111!~ ,,,. Jlld tl1rt1t1l'.h th(" L:.s. Lnvlf.1flflll'lltal Pwtl'l"tlon A~cncy ([PAL hereby offers ;i gr;int to. Orange county · the Sanitation DistJ:ict :·,,, 15.. __ .. '" .. II app: • .in:d n•sts up to and Ill\( C.\l"l'l'din!! G l~Al'lTi'.E Ul-!CANI/. Al ION $ 2 ,625 ,ooo GHANT AMOUNT for thl· \Ul'P••rt ,11 .1pprn\'cd hwl~l·t l'l'fh'd l'lf'c•n lk~i:r1h·d in :1pplil·a1ion (includi11g all application mudificatia111) _A_r_e_a_~_,_i_d_e_F_a_c_i_l_i_t_i_e_s_P_l_an ________ S.....:/:___1_5_./._7_4 _________ in duded herein by rcfcn·ncc. TITLE AND DATE ll1i~ Gr~mt Agreement is subji-rt t11 .1pph,\1blc t.:.S. hH'ir1111mcn1.d Pr111c·l·t111n A~cm·y statuatory provisions, grant rcg11l:iti1>11S (-10 CFR. Clwptcr I. Subchaprcr H) .ind of till' p111'i\11111:; ol' 1his'.1pl'l'J11cnt tl'arrs I r/;m·/J".1·. nit.: CrJntcc Or~JnizJtion ;ibli Jl!H.'CS that funds awarded will he us~d1ul··:y for the pur11•'~c~ ('f till· 1•r"1~·l't "" arprll\"l'd. P.1\ R'l' IV ATT.?\ CHE D L STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD . DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY CONTROL -:>OM 1015, RESOURCES BUILDING JAN ~416 NINTH STREET • SACRAMENTO 95BU 3 19 7 5 Mr. Paul De Falco, Jr. Regional Administrator Environmental_ Protection Agency Region ll 100 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Dear Hr. De Falco: RONALD REAGAN, Governor S T E P I --..... -,__ £E!, T.!.!,.!.C AT.!0!! Grant Application Certif ic.ation -Project No •. C-06-1073-010 The application for th.e project indicated below is submitted anq approved for a federal grant to tne maximum allowable amount based on the eligible project cost, and is approved concurrently for a state grant under tht Clean Water Bond Lav of 1970. Applicant: Orange County Sanitation Districts Project: Area Wide Facilities Flan Estimated eligible project cost: $3,500,000 · (see. Exhibit A) The project is included in the Interim Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin. Application and supporting documents enclosed with thiR certification are shown 1n Exhibit B. Certification of this project ia subject to the conditionB shown in Exhibit c. These conditions will be included in the state grant contract if not met by the time of contract execution. lio conflict exists between the project and the proposed NPDES percit conditions. Sincerely yours, Larry F. Walker. Chief Manager -Clean Water Grant Program Enclosures . ,/cc: Orange County Sanitation Districts l'. o • .Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 CRWQCli -llegion S John Carollo E.ngineen; 1990 l~o. California BlvJ. Walnut Creek, CA 94595 J.P.L •• Dr. George SimlllOUS 4800 Oakgrove Drive Pasadena. CA 91103 ' I ~ -., . I . . ProJeet. No. C-06-:1073-0!0, 9X'!!!Si9 County san.t.iation D1•!,ri.-ab!. \ ', ~ COST ESTIMA'tt;~ ·. l1hue 1 p·na.ae II ~yaluation & Design Coll5truct ~ Onerate ConstrUction (Pilot Plant) so.oo M $1,610.M o.s5 M • 0,485 M .. Technical aervices; o.os M· o,oeo. M. 0.20 M 0,200 i-1 0.20 M· 0,125 !il o.oo )1 0,000 I'! Sl.00 'I. j!;. $2,SOO l'~ · ... •"" ' -• 1nc.lude.a' Sl25.,000 expended ~or preparat.1on of 1973-74 i-rojoct 1-l.eport titled '+mProved ~roat.mont at. Rlant !'o· 2" £iled on Karch l, 197~, ~d pr•pa.ration of ~·ederal :el~. -~· .1 i .. ~ EXHIBIT ·R Application and Supporting Documents Project No. C-06-1073-010, Urange County Sanitarv Districts Enclosed is one copy each of the following documents: 1. Application form EPA 570-12 with attachments. 2. Applicant's resolution No. 72-148-1, adopted November 21, 1972, authorizing its representative. 3. Applicant's statement relative to availability of funds. 4. Comments and at_atements on planning agency and state Clearinghouse review. · 5. Contracts, proposed contracts, or an explanation of the intended method of awarding contracts. See page 22 of "Plan of Study" • • EXHillI'r C 1 SpeciAl Conditions Project lio. C-06-1073-010, Ornn5e County Sanitation DiHtricts 1. Grant Funds for the pilot study. Task II and III. shall not be expended until Task I -Feasibility Deaonstration of the JPL procens has been completed to the satisfaction of the State and federal reviewors. Tasks 1. II and_ Ill are detailed in the Plan of Stu<ly Approval Letter. Ta.sk I is ineligible for grant funding. 2. Tbe coats as proposed for the pilot plant project appear more th~n adequate. No expenditures vill be eligible for grant funds without prior approval of the expenditure by EPA and SWRCB representatives oc the review committee. 3. Grant Funds shall not be expend~d on the design or construction of the pilot plant until. a letter of agreement is signed between EPA and the California Institute !'.Jf Technology (CIT) on the licensing procedure of the JPL -ACTS process. The agreement 6lu\ll cover the se ttins of fees for licensing tha patent for the Jl'L -ACTS process. It will come into effect in the event licensing rights are waived by NASA to CIT. 'lV ~ 8 1ai2 M~~ .... M __ rm • . lll\l\E IU\f 11 \\:\TEil DISTltH'f P.O. Box D·I • 4201 Campus Drive• Irvine, Calif. 92664 • (714) 833-1223 Board of Supervisors County of Orange 515 North Sycamore Street Santa Ana, California Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Board of Directors Orange County Water District 10500 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Gentlem~n: March 23, 1975 At various prior points in time th~ Irvine Ranch Water Dis- trict {I~WD) has experienced the pleasure and opportunity to war~ with you and others on various matters of local public interest and benefit. This includes, in prior instances, matters possibly affect- ing the Newport Bay and San Diego Creek Watershed Area as well as other matters. IRWD would like to $Uggest· that you consider at this time a possible somewhat more definite and continuous working relationship looking toward ascertaining the existence of any such problems at this time and the formulation of a planning .effort to insure that such problems if ascertained to exist are resolved at the earliest possible date and the reoccurrence thereof obviated ·to the extent possible in the future. Hopefully, this will result in a joint effort to insure the proper ben~f icial use in the future of Newport Bay and the areas tributary thereto including San Diego Creek. Additionally, it may be desirable to consider establishing on an on-going basis an areawide waste management planning process as contemplated by Section 208 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Such a.possibility is not a suggested condition to any such relationship; however, we feel that the present situation and the Board of Supervisors County of Orange Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 5 o·f Orange County Board of Directors Orange County Water District March 23, 1975 Page Two · ·probability that an areawide waste management planning process will be formulated for and inclusive of this area are compatible considera- tions. Toward this end, IRND, at its Board of Directors meeting on March 21·, 1975, authorized and approved the execution of the enclosed ·proposed Joint Powers Agreement which has been executed on behalf of ~ IRWD; The provisions of the Joint Powers Agreement are intended ·to provide a means and vehicle for each of you to join with the Irvine· Ranch Water District in addressing what appears to be a ligitimate matter of public concern for ·each of the entities named therein as possible participants in the establishment of an entity which is suggested to be designated as the Newport-Irvine Waste Management Planning Agency (Nn~A). Should you desire to suggest changes to th~ operative provisions of the Agreement concurrent wfth or prior to your approval, please feel free to do so. · Also 1 the Board of.Directors of IRWD, by a separate r~solution, designated me as its Director, and Mr. E. Ray Quigley, also a member of the Board of Directors, as its Alternate Director. Both of us are looking forward to working with whomever is designated to parti- cipate in this effort by those of you that desire to join with us in what I am sure will be a concerted successful effort. The Board of Directors also authorized an initial disbursement of the sum of $2,000 to the treasury of the Newport-Irvine Waste Management Planning Agency (NIWA) at such time as one or more of the other therein-named agencies elects to also parti~ipate. Enclosed is information relative to matters of interest in the next few weeks which pertain·to the possible inclusion of Newport Bay -San Diego Creek as an area in the State of California where water quality has been degraded to the extent that desired uses are Board of Supervisors "-"" County of orange. Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County Board of Directors Orange County Water District MarGh 23, 1975 Page Three impaired or precluded and the complexity and nature of the situation requires an areawide waste treatment management plan. On behalf of the Irvine Ranch Water·Dist~ict, as well as person- ally, I would like to express my appreciation tor your consideration of this suggestion •. · I believe that this can be a succes~ful, worthwhile and neces- sary undertaking to accomplish a goal which is deserving of our at- tention .and joint efforts. The result would seem· to be clearly in the best interests of those who will hav.e the opportunity to enjoy these areas now and in the future. Very ·truly yours, IRVINE RANCH NATER DISTRICT Yr~· L. E. Eberling r President ·LEB:ct Enc ls. cc: William F. Hurst, General Manager Irvine Ranch Water District Arthur C. Korn, Secretary Irvine Ranch Water District Alexander Bowie, Legal Counsel Irvine Ranch Water District Don Owen Don Owen & Associates Robert Shelton Robert Shelt9n, Inc. Al(XANO[R ClOWIE ~ SPEtiCER E. COVI:. RT, JR. ALEXANDEH 130\VIE A LAW COnJ•OnATION 610 NEWPOFIT cc~n:n onivc. JUITE 500 NCWPORT BEACH, CALJrORNIA 9?660 March 23, 1975 Mr. L. E. Eberling, President Board of Directors Irvine Ranch Water Distrfct 4201 Campus Drive Irvine,. California 92664 Dear Mr. Eberling: AnEA coor: 114 TC:L(PIHJN[ C44 9311 REF. OUR FILE Following the meeting on Friday, March 21, 1975, relative to the San Diego Creek Watershed area, including Newport Bay, you asked me to summarize the .matters discussed and matters that may be occurring in the near future which relate to the matters discussed. I did not take notes and hence, this is only my personal recollection. A. The following persons were present: l.· · Irvine Ranch Water Di~trict: · L. E. ~berling, Alexander Bowie, Don Owen,· and Robert Shelton. 2. County of Orange: Supervisor Thomas F. Riley, H. G. Osborne, and · Scott Ferguson. 3. County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County: Donald Mcinnes and Fred. Harper. 4. Orange County Water District: Neil Cline 5. City of Newport Beach: Robert Wynn 6. California Regional Water Quality Control Boa~d -Santa Ana Region Jim Anderson. ;.tr. L. 1~. J·:1~e1:ljncr, PJ.«·!;ir1cnt Bo~1nl c)f Di i~::c~.n1:s Tc1.i11(~ J~.in<:h ~-1 ,·:h·r: n·i~;r·.cict r.1;11:ch /. .1, 19 ·7 5 P~...:.gc r_e • ...,o B. 'T1hr:~ <1.i.!;cn:;~;.i_on r,cntcred on-.the c1csir.nhility of c~~t:;<.blL;hf:1c_r ll on JO in9 re li1·f:inn ~:hip by r::,::;ans of a ,J•.)in t ro'."·::' rs l\.<J i:c.~ C'.tten t o.r: otherwise to u.ddn:~~r~ -;·n~ter flUa.lity <ls \·:ell as other matters relatlng to Newport ~ai and the· San Diego Creek Watershed. The opinion was exp~essed but not concurred in by all that prob- abilities at pre~cnt abpear to be that an'area designation by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) pursuant to Section 208.of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and 40 CFR 126.l et seq would occur in the near future following a public hearing before the SWRCB hearing officers, Jean ~uer and Roy Dodson. The conclusion of the fiscal year and the delegation of the authority to execute contracts .with desig- nated planning agencies by the Sta~e Water-Resources Coritrol· Board to its Executive Officer, Bill Dendy, was rioted. This .action was understood to have been taken on F~bruary 20, 1975 . . ~he followiDg matters were also discussed: 1. One area i~ Lake Tahoe has been so designated. Several similar suggested des~gnated are~s were not concluded. · The reasons for such concl~sion including approval by the Regional Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, Reg~on IX (EPA) were not known. 2. The SWRCB is condricti,g hearings as to five such possible designations. The areas <:s \\1 cll as the date and locations'of the hearings are as set fo~~h in the notices appended as .Enclosure I to this h.:.:~cr. 3. The probabilities are that the SWRCB will affirma- tively not designate the areas of the State for which hearings have not been scbcdulcd. The 208 Plans for the State 6f California will be basically the Basin Plans as to point sources, supplemented as to water quality problems by bays, estuaries, sub-surface groundwater sources, non-point discharges, ~nd pos- sible relevant land use and air quality considerations as they relate to the foregoing. Also primary and secondary drinking water nt~ndards ticing and to be promulgated pur·suant to t11e recently enacted Safe AT~EX.i\ Nl)'f•:n HO"\VIE A ll<'N COHl'<.JllATION :·1r. L. F.. Eberling, President n0Llrd of Dir1;ctors Irvine Ranch \•later District Ma1:ch 23, 1975 Page rrhrce Drinking Water Act may also be relevant in some instances, particularly where reclaimed water is being injected underground into or in an area in- fluencing what is a principle source of supply to a sub~tantial number .of persons .. 4 •. It was noted that it may be possible to obtain a separate designation of the Newport Bay -San Diego Creek area because of the complex and unique L1atters of the situatjon at hand and the substantiai and challenging nature of the possible sources of con- tributing factor~ to th~ present situation. 5. Possible alternative designees ~or the a~ea were discussed as well as the possibility· of concurrent designation of more than one entity·as to this area. This included the· So·,1thern ·california Association of Governments (SC!~G) , the Santa Ana l\Tp.tersheci Plan- ning Agency (SAWPA) a:nd a pos.sible Joint Powers Ag.··'.:e- ment inclusive of the coµ1~ies of Los Angeles, Ean Bernardino, Riverside, Ventura, and Orange. These possibilities appeared to some to detract from the · local nature of the present situation. C. It appeared to be a consensus that none present felt any of the entities proposed as-participanis by the Irvine Ranch Water District would be negative to such a matter being suggested.for their possible consideration. D. The following matters occurring in the near future appeared· relevant to the discussion: March 21 March 21 · March 24 IRWD consideration of proposed Joint Powers Agreement SAWPA Board o.f Directors meeting Joint Powers Agreement executed by IRWD; to be delivered to County Sanita- tion District No. 5 of Orange County for its consideration, and concurrently copies tb be deli~ered to the County of Orange and Orange C~unty Water Di.strict. AI4EXANDEH .130\VJE· A LAW CORPOH/U ION Mr. L.· E. Eberling, President Board of Directors Irvine Ranch Water District Marcl:l 23, 1975 Page Four March 26 Board pf Dire~tors meeting of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County March 28 ·Possible date for Organizational Me._: ting of NIWA if approved by County Sanita.ti~:m· District-No. 5 of Orange County on March ~6 March 31 California Regional Water Quality Control Board -Santa Ana Region -Technical Ad- visory_ Committee meeting at Orange Coast College A~ril 1 Hearing on 208 Designation in County of San Die_go April 3 May 12 May 26 June 9 Hearing on 208 Designation for area c~~pris- . ing South Coast Air Basin or SCAG area in- cluding Los Angeles and Orange Counties, as well as porti6ns of Rivers~de, San Bernardino and Ventura Counties Possible approximate date for d~signation of 2os·areas by SWRCB Possible approximate date for EPA approval of 208 Designation Possible approximate date for execution of 208 Planning Agreement by Executive Officer of SWRCB per 2/20/75 delegation and NIWA Any comments or suggestions supplementing the information herein · set forth would be appreciated. Very truly yours, ) ·' • •, It-: : ; .... :· \._ -~-·· Alexander Bowie AB:ct -. EDI·HJMD G. BH0 1:.'N ,JH. i.(11)/,\ 1015, l'.f:~··· .. rJ;.,(lS HUllDltlG IJl!Hli '.:>ii:tH • SACRA/l,(1~10 'i5:Jl4 ,.__., NOTICE; OF PU13T.IC HEAHTNG TO REcrnvE EVIDENCE · ON Tilr: PO~JSII3LE DESIGNATION OF THE SACilJ\i.mNTO 1·1J·~'l'HOPOLITAN AREA AS AN AfmAWIDE WASTf~ TH.E/\.'l'i·~ENT MANAGEMENT PLANNING AREA PURSUANT TO ;;ECTTON 208 OF THE 1972 AMENDMf~NTS TO THE FEDEHAL VJATEH POLLUTION COHTROL ACT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that .the Executive Officer of . the Sta.te Water Resources Control .Board, acting pursuant to autl1ority delegated by the State Water Resources Control Board, hereby identifies the Sacr~~nento Metropolitan Area as a poten- tial areawide waste treatment management planning area. The area ide1~ified consists of the following: THOSE PORTIONS OF SACRftJ~ENTO, PL;\CER, AND YOLO COUNTIES LY·ING WITHIN THE SACRAiv~ENTO URBAN AHEA, · ·HJCLUDING THE COMMUNITIES OF DAVIS, WOODLAND, COURTLAND, ELK GROVE, ROCKLIN, AND ROSEVILLE NOTICE IS ALSO GIVEN that· the jtat~ Water Re~ources Control Bonrd, pursuant to the authority vested by Section 208 .of the · Feder·a1 V.Jater Pollution Control Act Arne.ndments of 1972, qnd pw,suant. to regulatio~s contained in.Stbchapter 18, Chapter 3, Title 23, California Administrative Code, proposes to receive evidence on the nece~sity or appropriateness of des~gnating the· Sacramento Metropolitan Area, . and any appropriate contiguous areas, as an areawide waste ireat~ent manag0ment planning area '.1nd the appropriate boundaries and_ planni-ng organization for any :.trea designated. · NOTICE IS ALSO. GIVEN that evidence will be received at a hearing.to be hel·ct at l:JO p.m. on April 8, 1975, in Room l·lJJ.,' Resources Building, 1416 Ninth Street, Sacr3lTlento, CA 95814. · At said hearing, any interested p~rspns may present state- ments and argunents orally or in \'\'Ti ting relative to the desig- nation of the Sacramento Metropolitan Area as an areawide waste treatmerit management planning area, the appropriate boundaries to be desienated, and an appropriate planning organization. To the extent possible, statements and argu11ents should bG presented in v-.rriting at, or prior to, the hearing date but may .be presented in writing any time prior to and including April 15, 1975. \\'ritten comments should be submitted to the State Water Resources Control Boa.rd, Room 1.015, Resources Bui_lding, 1416 Ninth Street, ·:Enclosure I S:1r.r-_r11~1<:ntoj CA .C))·'~lh. The :-:;tatc Do;trcl ·.:Jill d<:Lnnnine, nt a ~ : ~ c h 1 ! d n 1 e d "' r .! c· L i n 1~ ,. i .f :1Jl y p :_ u · t o .f t, h c ~) n. c r n ir1 <.: u t o Mc; t r o po l i ta n A1·e:! :;hould be de:;·j./~n:_d~cd :1:-3 :in .~n·c:1v1i.dc v1.:i~tc trc:.·1tn1cnt n:::-11101~·: mcnL pl:inn:ing an:a. /\.Tly dcsi.1~n.J.tion by the Stnte Bonrd will be for the pucpo~..>c of c1c~.;.i1~nating the tlppr·opr iatc bound::ir:i.c:-; of the :JrcG o.nd an . appropci.::ito plo.nnin~ oq~ani:.-'.at ion ',·1hich fulfill:3 tho:;c rcquirc1ncnts cnntainod in Section ?.08 of the Fcder.:il \vater P 1 )l lution Control /1ct .Arne:ndrncnts of 19'/2 und Subchaptcr 18, Chapter 3, Title 23, California Adrninh,;trative Code. Any area dc0i.1~nnted may be of gre::ttcr or lesser extent thnn that area ilic·1tifiod by the f·~zccuti\rc Officer, d<~pcndinr.:; upon· ~vidcnce received at the aforementioned public hcG.:cing. The State will designate appropriate ·.rn.:.:.no.Gcrn:_-=-nt o.gencies-to implement the developed. plan pursuant to Section 208 of the Federal \~later Pollution Control Act Arnendmer:~s of 1972 anti will use its enforcement authorities, as necessary and appropriate, to assure impleme~tation. Tiiis notice is intended to satisfy applicable requir<?ments of federal regulations contained in Part 105, .Subchapter D, Chapter 1, · CFR, Title 40. Administrative proc~dures and inter- . agency discussions have delayed the scheduling ·and calling of this hearing. Time ~nd funding constrairits necess~tate that this hearing be held at the earliest possible data. · Dated: M.4R 1 ~ 1~l5 1:''~ .. ~~(1·:~~.,~~::t: .... ·, ' STATE \\'ATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD /J~_o 4 ,l\c~ j . I j •/..4-/J . .__,., -. ~ ~,1 Bill B. Dendy Executive Officer ·"Enclosure I .. :;rid[ OF (/.J 110n:rA . 1111: i<r~,OUi<O<; /,Cft~CY : . ··. tlGO:,\ lf'Jl.';, 1n~,()IJ!.;C[S r.UIUJIHG 1), :11n11 ::.1nr:r • SAC~M.•.uno ?.'.::~14 "'-""' llOTICr~ OF PUBLIC HE/:.RTNG TO HECKlVE EVIDEHCJ~ ON THE POS:3U3LE DJ·::3IGMATIUN OF 'l'JIE SAN DJEGO /\HEA /\S J\N "1',lfff~\·/ ruE ::.'A~3TE 'l'itl·~A'lf:JEi~'r MA!'!AGEMENT PLANNUlG AH.EA PUH.~=>UA~'I'l' TO ~JEC'l'ION 208 OF THE 1972 f\lflEN Dl 11ENTS TO TIIE . FEDERAL WATER .POL~,UTION COUT110L ACT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the· Executive Officer of the State Water Resources Gontrol Board, acting pli.rsuant to ~uthority delegated by .the State Water Resources Control Board, hereby identifies the San Diegq Area as a potential areawide waste treatment ~anagement planning area. The area ~dentified consists of the following: THAT PORTION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY LYING ~IBST OF ANZA BORREGO STATE DESERT PARK AND TRIBUTARY TO THE PACIFIC . OCEAN BET~·.TEEN rrHE CALIFORNIA-:ti.EXICO BOUiJDfJl.Y AND THE ORANGE COUNTY AND RIVERSIDE COUNTY LINES; . AND THAT PORTION OF THE SANTA ~·-·ARGP_RITA RT\FER WATERSHED LYING . \'JITHIN RIVERSIDE COUN'i1Y. NOTICE IS ALSO GIVEN that the State Water Resources Control Board, pursuant to the authority vested by Section 208 of the Federal VJ.ater Pollutic1n Control Act Amendments of 1972, a,nd ptu,suant to regulatio~s contained in Subchapter 18, Chapter 3, Title 23, California Administrative Code, proposes to receive evidence on the necessity or appropriat~ness or· designating the .San Diego Area, and any appropriate contiguou~ areas, as . an areawide waste treatmE:nt management planr-ing area and the appropriate boundarie.s and planning organization for any area designated~ · NOTICE IS ALSO GIVEN that evidence ·will be received at a hearing to be held at.1:30 p.m. on April 1, 1975, in Room B-109, State·Of~ice Building, 1350 Front Street, San Diego, California. At said hearing, any interested pe~sons may present state- ments and arguments ora-: 1..y or in writing relative to the desig- nation of the San Diego Area as an areawjde ~aste treatment management planning area, the appropriate bounduries to be designated, and an appropriate planning organization~ To the extent possible, Stt~terncnts o.nd arc1.J!nents should be presented in writing any time i=-··:·ior to and inc 1 ud.ing April 8, 1975. . Written conuncnts should be submitted to the State \·.r3ter Resources Control Board, Room 1015, Rcsotu·ces Building, 1416 Ninth Street, Sacramento, CA 95814. The State Board will determine, at a sched- uled meeting, if any part of th,e San Diet;o t.rca should be Enclosure I dc:;io::1Ccd :J.f~ nn. :u:c:i·:Ji.de ·.-::·t:~te L1··~:il.11-ii,•nt 11:::.:n:11~c11H~nt p]:lnni ng ::1·r.:.2. f1[1Y d(;:;i:;:n:d~i.ori by Llic :3t:.1to 13o:wcl ':Jill be for tho ...._.,. p 1 w p n : ~ c o r d ri : ; i 1 ~ n ;:i L i n ! ~ U 1 c ;i p pc o J> c :i. .t I~ c hound a i, J c ~.; o f L h c al · c a l":nc.l an :.q>p1·01w.i.:Jtc pl:·frm.i.ng 01~1~:-u1:i~~~1t i.on ·1·;ld.ch fulfills tho~3C o::r111Lr<;rnr_~nt~3 conta i nc:!d. in ,'jcction ?.OS of the Federal Water PolluL i.011 Cuntro l lo.ct /~Jr;<;nJrnc11t~.> of 1')'/~ ;~ncl :3ubclv1ptcr 18, . Ch::ipL1.~c 3, 'J.'-.Ltlq 23, Cali.forni:J. /\d;nini:.;t.rat:ivc Coclc. Any r1rca de:.i·i.g11:1t<:.:d rnay be of· gn)~:ttpr or lc:_;scr extent than that 0rc)a iucnti.f.'icd by the Executive Officer, depending upon evidence rccc j_v 1 :d ::it the aforerncntioncd public hcnrine. · The ~3t:Jtc ~.-1 :i.ll c11.;sig11ate appropriate. rno.nagc:ncnt 3[?3ncics to .i.rnplencnt the developed plo.n purst~ant to Section 20b of the Fc<focal :'latu"' Pollution Co~;trol ./\ct !:rnendmcnts of 1972 G.nd '.-.rill use its enforcement authorities, as necess~ry and: appropriate; to assure implcmcntatio_n. This notice is intended to satisfy applicable requirements of federal regulations contained in Part 105, Subchapter D, Chapter 1, CF'R, Title 40. Admin:: strative procedures and inter- agency discussions have delayed ~he scheduling and calling of this hearing. Time and funding constraints n8cessitate-that this hea~ing be held at the earliest possible ~ate. STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD . /{,~41 A .'\ I -..;; .. ~ ... ~ .... ,,.,. /J . . i. ' r:~.. ,,,.-..... Bi 11 B. Dendy.-~ -----1 Executive Officer Enclosure I U""\ 1r.1o;, ;r~~n1::.us !·Uili·Hlf'I J!,~::1m1 ~m~u.r ~ .c;:,•:r:..!.~; ~1ro ·1~u1.t iJOTJCE OF PU13LTC JJEJ\Hir-IG 'l'O HW:I·:lVJ·~ EVTDI·:HCE ON '1' 111~~ PO~>:-n BLE m::~nrn! J\'J' JU '.'I 0 F 'J"HE I·iOI!TJ<H.EY !Hi_'( J\HEA f1S /\N J\HEJ':~.rJTJW ':.'.A.:)'i'E Tl?.EATJ.~1·;'.-JT T-11\NACI•:.:EIJT PL/\i~HHIG AHEA PUi1.Sl}hi·JT 'i'O :)i·:CT.LON ~U;) OF' THE 1')72 AI .. 1J·~NDf.ff;J·n'S 'l'O ';':IE F'EDEHAT-! \·/f\'l'Ell POLLUTION COhTIWL AC'r NOTICE IS }1 1~Hhl3Y GIVEN that. the :S.-~ecutivc ·orr.i.ccr of ·the State Water Resources Control Boci.rd, n.ctiI).g ·pursuant to autho1·ity delegated by the State Water Resources Control Board, hereby· identifies the f.~onterey Bay Arca consist inc; of the fol lowing as a potential arem·.ride wo.ste treatment :m1hagcmont , planning area: ALL OF SANTA CRUZ OOUNTY, THAT PORTION OF THE PAJARO- SAN BENITO RIVER. DRAINAGE AREA LYING NORTH OF A LINE LOCATED FOUR MILES ;-JOUTH OF 'I'HE CITY OF LOLLISTER IN THE -C:OUTH SAM'I'A CLARA VALLEY IffDHOLOGIC SUBUNIT, THAT POWf:tON OF THE SALINAS RIVEH BA~ 1]~ EXT::.·;mING FiiOM GO{-JZALES TO MONTEHEY BJ~'{, .THE 1·.l<J1·~TE?..EY ?ENINSULA, A11JD THE CAR~·~EL RIVER BASIN. NOTICE IS ALSO GIVK·J that the State h1G.tE:r Resources Control Eoar·d, pin·:_;i.;.c-:.nt to the authority ves~.ed by Section 20$ of the Federal \·~~ater Pollution Control Act !unendme!1ts of" 1972, o.nd ourSuant to regulations contained in Subchapt~r 1$, Chapter.3, Title 23; California Administ'.rat.ive Code, proposes to receive evidence on the r.tecessity .or appropriate!1e~~~.s of design2ti~~ the Monte~2y Bay Area, and any ap~ropriate contiguous are~s, c:lS an areC:.\'Jide \\~o.ste treatment r:>--::-igemerrt planning area o.nd the appropriate boundaries and pl~nning organ~zation for any area des.ignated. NOTICE IS ALSO GIVEN that the evidence vlill be recei\red at a hearing to be held at io· a.m; on April 4, 1975, in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, 250 Main Street, \·.ratsonville, California. . At said hearing, any interested persons may present state- ments and argU"nent s orally or in i,..,.yiting re la ti ve to the desig- nation of the I',ionterey Bay Arca as an areawide waste treatment r·!.:rnagcrnent planning at·ca, the appropriate t-ou11daries to be (:c:~;ignated, and an appropriate planninr; or.c;anization. To the extent po~3siblc, statcL:·:~nts and a.rt;u:r:cnts should be prc:-.~ented in vr.riting at, or pri~r to, the hearing date but may. be pr~- s c n t c d in '••Tit in g C3. n y time prior to a 11 d inc 1 u ding A pr i 1 11, 19?5. \·.rritten comrnents ~3houl.d be sub:nittcd to the St~te \',1 J.ter Rc~ourccs Control Bo.a1·d, Room 1015, Ticsourccs Buildint;, 1416 Nin th Street, S.::tcro..rncnt0, CA 95 81.Lt. The St ntc BoGrd will Enclosure I (·;y··'.· .-.. ... ' -• 1 :·~.:-/· ch~f·,c·1·rn.i.11C"~, ;tt a :;cl11.~dn]1:1l 11;(~1;t·in;~, i.l.' .~i1./ f';q·t of Lhu r.:C)11tr~c<:y I~ay !tJ'(!;1 :~honld be~ (lc:;·i.u1atc1c.1 :.1:; ;.n :it·c:-.·:;i_d,~ ·.-::1::tc L!'<;:·iL11,r~r1t rn:tnti.gr:rncnt pL111n.i.n.: :·1rc:l. Any d<~:>i;~:::·d~!.nn bf Lhc ~t;d-,r.~ i'~o:H·ci v.ri ll .be for tlic p1x1'po:3e of cJc~:.d1~n~.iting U.ic :1 i•f;ropc-i..-ttc bound-- ac.ics of the :-J1·0a ..-illd ::in approrwi..'J.t.c pl.·1nning m·;_~:1ni.1..;d~ion which fulfi.l l0 tho:)c; rnrp.rircrncnts cont::iin<~·l in ~-)r.:ct:i.on 20t~ of the Federal ~:latc:r Pollution Control Act ,\1 d1.;nr'.'.n<~!lL~_; of l')'/2 ~1nd S1·bdl°apter 18, Ch.~rtc;r 3, Title ?.3, C;:~lifo1·nL:i A1_>n.i.!d_~5t.1·:1t:i.vc Code. Any o.rca dc~:d.f~natccl rnay be of g1·r;atur o.c 1<.)::;~;cr extent than ·thGt aI·ea iclc:nt·i ficd by the Executive Off·L1~cr·, dcpcnc.line; l;pon evidence rccciv d at the <1-forr::rn<:ntionccl public hcH·ine;. · The S~t ate wi l 1 de :3.i.gna~e appro p:r:io.te rn~; n~1gc-;::c nt :"1{~/)nci cs to implement the clc;velopcd plan pursuant to :-Jccti.on t:Oes of the Federal Water Pollution Control jict Arncncl:ncnts. of ·1972, and ,,,,ill use its enforcement authorfties, as necessary ·and apprc·priate, to assure implementation. This notice is intended to satisfy applicable requirements of federal regulations contained in Part 105, Subchapter D, Chapter 1, CFR, Title 40. Administrative procedures and inter- c.gency discussions have delayed thc3 schedulin,:;· and calling of this hearing. Time and funding co:·1straints necessitate that this hearing be held at the earliest possible date. · Dated: Enclosure I E fJ;. i I J rm ( ~ • I q l ( r:.: N .. I H • ~11-rr. ··.·r 1·1.1111.:.!1:.', 11!r. r·r:-.·· u;.q> ,..,-.,:,cv { .. ~i J-· .. i·~.:·:,:.•: <·: .:• .. ;'f. (~ .... ,., n11t l" .. f • ·1• \ 1 / .'. ·1) .,f"c' . .._, ,,, 'I ' "(-' ,.' .. '(~, ''()I 1)[) .)f1\l1: ,',,\!!.:\ ;:,_.-.() );·~<..:~ c )1·.1h. _)_ •• _./·.,\ '·'· t~)l'i, :.:~.1 /'.J.'~ t~:J:i ;~!fj l~i ~:::~;1 ·,·1 n :.·r 0 ~,,-_u;;a.1,•.:.:no •i:: 1.c '-' ~ J)O'i'ICE OF' PUBLIC IIEAHii'!G TO RT·J~ETVE EVTDENCJ~ ON 't'JIE l'0:3~ll3LE .DE~3IGNJ\TJON OF 'i.'lII·~ ~]OUTII COJ:.:.)'L1 1~li:J•:A · /\,S f\N /d~.Et~WIDJ~ ~·,ff~;3Tr·~ THl~/\TY·1ENT I·1AT·!M~Vi·'.!i::NT PLAfJll:Ll.JG J\HEJ\ PUH5UANT TO ;~ECTJON 203 OF TH~~· 1')'72 AI·.mr·m:.m1rrs TO THr~ FFDUl/\L ~·.1 ATEH. POLLUTION CONTHOt /!CT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the ·Ezc~uti~e Officer cif the State Wa.ter Rcso.u.1·Ges Control Board, acting purs}..1ant. to authority delegated by the State \•later Reso-.~cces Co::itrol Board, hereby identifies the South Coast Area as a potent ~.al areawide wa~..:te treatment management planning area. The area identified consists of the follo\·Jing: AL~ OF ORANGE COUWL'Y AND THOSE PORT~ONS -OF VENTURA, ~Jos AI-!GfLES, RI·.'EHSIDE,. A~'~D SAN B~~R~!fuqDINO com~TIES LYING WlTHIN THE ~ANTA CLARA, LOS ANGELES, AND SANTA ANA RlVER Bf.SIN F.~,ANNING AREAS, AND THAT P0}1TION. OF HIVERSIDE CCUNTY LYING NORTm·JEST OF THE ·sAi·JTA I·Y~RGARITA RIVER SUE.BASIN AHD SOUTH OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN ?LAi~NJ.m 1'.LitEA. NOTICE IS ALSO GIVEN that the StatEf Water Resources Control Board, pursuant to the aut bority vested by Sect ion 20$ of the Feeler al ':lat er Pollution Control Act ..-'U:1end.ment s of 1972, and purs:...:ant to regulations conta.~Lned in Sue·:: rt&?ter 18, Chapter 3, Title 23, California Administr.at ive Code, proposes to receive evidence on the necessity or appropriateness of designating the .South Coast Arc J., 2.nd any appropriate contiguous areas, as an areav1ide v:aste treat1i1ent management plann~_ng area and· the app:~orriate bo:undo.ri~s and planning organization for any area dcsignat~d. · NOTICE IS ALSO GlVEN that evidence will be received at a hearing to. be hc:ld at 1:30 p.m. on April 3, 1975, in Room 1138 of ~(,he State BuilJing, lq? South Broadv:ay, ·Los Angeles, Califorr:ia. At said hear J_ng, any intcn:~sted persons may present state-. n~ c ri ts · and ar grnn en t s orally or in w.ri ting re lat iv.; to the des i g- n;-1 ti on of the South CoQ~;t Area as an areavtide 1·,'&.ste treatment · mt~.n2;~cmcnt pl.:-i.nni;1g ~U'C3, the appropriate boundaries t.o be designate~, a~d an appropriate planning organization. To the extent possible, st:.~tc1~1cnt s and ar gurr.cnt s should be presented in writing at, ~r prior to, the hearing cht:e .but may be presented in ·.-.rriting nny t.imc prior to and including April 10, 1975. \\·ritten co:n:::c:nt~ ~~.hould be submitted to the State \'.1 0.ter Resources Control Board, H.oom 1015, He sources I3uildit1g, 1416 Ninth Street, ··Enclosure I Ii ·y·,, .. L ~-... ~~· .. ~-~ ~)· , ... ..._,.. ~~:H:r·.-1:nr:11Lo, CA S)5:·~U 1 • The :·~t:1L1~ r~u:i1'<l 1 .. 1il1. d1.!l~1:;i·1;ii_w~,· :1L a . , l 1 l . . ' i' , . , , " . :;cr:1.:< 11,1!< i:;f~ct 1 n1~, .if. rrny p:1!'t ~) l,11<~ ~;1)111,11 Co:·;~~t J\i·i.:?:1 :~h1)11l<l l;n 1 !r1:;i.1:n:-~t«~<l :::.:; :·Jn :u·l.:::~vli.dc '.-.':1::!-,(; Lr·(;;~;.~:!r,·nt ii1:·1:1:1u::r1t'nt pl:;nn i ng nr·crL -M1y dr~hi,;~n:1t.i.on by the St:ttc Bonni wi.11 be] fo1· tlw pucpo~:e ot' ,~,"!~.>i ,r~n:1t.ing Lhe o.ppC()f1r·L1!~c Lo1111c1::.ci.c;~.> of the :-it·c:1 :~uid :1n :.q1pr·ouci . .-itc pL:mning or1;-an-Lzal:.·i.on ·:.ihi.ch fnlf'i ll::; Lho:;e .n;n11i1·c--·"' . \ . ' 111r:nL~3 COilLtLi ;1ed :in Scct.i.on ~?t)o of the F•;1 1':t·:ll· \·.1 :!l~l~C PQl.l uti on ·.couLr·ol Act /tJ!iCJldrn0ut~; of 19'1~ ~1ncl ~ju~>ch:tpL1..~c n~, ChapLc~r 3, Title 23, California A<Jrn:i.nist1·at.ivc Co<le. t.nf :J1'C.J. c1c:)i.gn:~tcd rnay b_c o.f r~cGatcr or. lc!3:>Qr extent t,h.·1n that ;_n·c~~ ic:r;nt:i..i':i.c~d by L11c~ EzcclJtivc Offic..-.:r, dcpr::nding u·~>on cv:i:dcnce r·c;c1_:ivcd nt the a fo:r·c!ncnt:i.oncd public hc:.n·:in~. . The State v.rill designate appr·oprici·::.c m2nr.tr~oment ·agencies to· -imp.1.o:nc:nt the developed plan pursuant to Sccti~.m· 208 of the F~~de.t·al Water Pollution Control Act 1·::-nendrnent s of 1972 and ·will i::-3e. its· enforcement authorities, as necessary and appropriate., to a~5surc i1:1p lcmer~ t.ation. · ·This notice is intended to sa·; ·_sfy o.ppl 1.cable rc;quirc::rr~ents of. federal regul2.tions co.otaincd in Part 105, Subchapter_ D, . Chapter 1, CFR, Title ·ho. Administrative procedures and inter- agcncy discussions have d~layed the scheduling and calling of this hearing. Time and funding constraints necessitate that ::.his hearing be held at the e&rliest possible date. 1.''R ! .:.i.. ST ATE t 1ATER RESOURCES CONTnOL B.OARD Enclosi:rre I -r.o_:.1, 101 'j, : i "rJtHCrs r:nrnn~G . ~6 rrnu11 '..i~Hr o ~ACP/.JM.::ro ·1~:~1-4 NOTICE OF PUBLIC IIEAH1JJ(; TO ;n:cJ;~lVE 1;;VTDEPCJ~ ON TIIE Po:.;:3LBfJr~ !W~:nr;!IATTON OF Till~ SAN FR/\J.JC I~XO DAY. Af?i·~A M) /l.N J~l{i•:f .. \'/ [j)I•: ·.-.it~:·;·n; THENf'!·lU'l'r MANAGEi·~EHT PLAi·1r·nr·JG Ai~EA FUil.~.JIJAiJT TO :Ji·:C'L'JON ?.03 OF THE 1')'/~ f\!.'·l'.~i-JDI:I;<NTS TO Tlll~ FEDERAL ':lJ\'l'EH. POLLUTION CONTROL 1\G'f NOTICE IS HEfiEBY GIVEN that .tho Exc.cutivc Officer· of . the State Water Reso~ces Control· Board, acting purst:.:--tI1t to authority delegated by the State h;ater Resources Control I3o.Jrd, hereby identifies the San F.c2ncisco Bay Arca as a potential areavlide v;aste tree.t.rnent m.J.no.goment planning a:cea. The area identified consists of the follo·.-Jing: ALL OF ALAMEDA, COlJTRA COSTA, SAN FRANCISCO, SAN· t.1ATEO, AND SANTA CLARA COUNTIES AND THOSE PORTIONS OF NAPA, MARIN, ~:30NOMA, AND SOLANO com~TIES LYING WITHIN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY BASIN PLANNING.AREA. I·JOTICE IS ALSO GIVEN that. the State ·.',Tater Re.sources Control Board, pursi...:ant to the a-:J_tho.ri ty vested by Section 208 of tl-ie FcdeT'a l · \'.1ater Polluti-::m Control A9t Ar:1endment s of 19'/2, and pursuant to regulations contained in SiJbchc.:.~)ter 18, ChaptGr 3, Tit 1 e 2 J ,-Ca 1 if or n i a A drn in is tr at iv e Code , r .e o po ::3 e s t o rec o iv e · . i t' •t . t f ' . . , cv1c.cnce· on ne necessi -y or appropria ,cness o aesJ.t!inting tr~e. San Francisco Bay Area, and ~iny appropriate cont_,iguous are~s, as an areawide waste treatment rnanc-.:;e:;J_~mt planning area and the appropriate boundaries and planning organization for any area · designated. · NOTICE IS ALSO GIVEN that ev1aence i.·1ill be rec2ived at a hearing to b~ held ~t l:JO p.m. on April 7, 1975, in the Assc~bly Room of ·the State Buildin~ 1111 Jackson Street, Oakland, Californi~. At said hearing, any interested persons may present state:nents and arguoents orally or in writing relative to the designation of the San Francisco Bay Area as an ar~awide ~aste treatment manage-· ment planning area, the appropriate bow1daries to be desic;ni:tte.d, and an appropriate planning organi~ation.· To the extent possible, statements and c-:.rr;uments should be prcEentcd in vrriting at, or p1·ior to, the heari.ng date but may be presented in •,.-.;riting any t i?ne prior tp and inc luclir~g April 14, 1975. 1(rit ten· comments should be sul--:mittcd to the State Water Resources Control I3oard, E11closure I ' ., 1 J1•;r1 101), F·~:;n·i11'f'r~:; J~11i.ldin1~, 11 1 16 1·Ji11th :3Lr·cc!t, :;:icr·::111c:nLo, ( /\ 'f)c'~lh. 'i'}H~ ~~l,:JI.<! J:.0::1·cl v1i.l.1. 11 1 :l~r;1::11inn., ;,t ;i. !~(;Ji.:~1"111.c}<l ;...-·c;:~ i n1r,, i.·t' ;111y p:u·I~ of tile ~~;tJ} Fr·:·iilC i.:~co. n:11 ,~cca :;110uld be ,;,_::: i ,,-n;d~(~d a:~ :.111 :H·c::i~.-1 irlc \·:;t~.:t.u Ln::1L:;J1.:r1t 1:i:l:]:-t:~r~:nc11t D 1 :1r1nir11r ·t J • • . (J . .. • tJ :·1·1·!:1. Arq clr.::~:i uiat ion by the :>t:~t,,~ l10;1cd vii 1. l be for the pur- p·n:~r~ of <11~:.d 1~11aVi ng L1ie :1.ppr·o1J1·.L:Lr~ 11ound:1t· i i-;:5 of the .~u·co. 0nd :;n .-: Pllf'OIH'L.tLc~ pl ;1rn1 i n,1~ or·;:;-i 1ii.i',:: :·,_i_nn 1.-111 i.ch Cu LJ'i 1.1 !3 tho:;cJ c1;1~1d rr:i:1c:nts conl .. Ti.nc<l i.n :>:..1~!~ i.on /.l):-~ of the~ Fc 1 ~•)ral ·\'!atcr . l'oi'-1.ut:i.on Cont:col Act 1~1w;mJ:;jC;lll.~~) or 1.f)'/2 :ind :)UtJ1;h;1pLc.r l8, Cl1..-q;Ler 3, Title 23, Cl.11 i.forni:i J\<;'.nin.i.~:;t-c.~ti~.i.ve Code. /u1y n:cca dc~:.; iJ-~natc;d m3y be of p;n::·!tcr or lc:;~:;cr e_:-:t.ent th2n that ;irca ldr::ntificd by the L·ncuL.ivc OL'fi.(J:r, dnpcndi.ng lir.·on c:vi<lcnce r<)c:~i .. rcd at the a.forcI11cnt:1.0111]d publ.ic. h(~G1'ing. · . · .. The State will desi·u;na.-~.c appropriate rno.nags:~~1cnt agencies to implement the developed plan pursuant to Sect1on 208 of the Feder~l Water Pollution Cont.-01· Act Amendments of 1972 o.nd will l~~:;·c its enforcement ::iuthorities, as nc.cessary and· ap.propriate, to assure implement~:::.ion. This notice is int~nded to satisfy applicable requirements of fed.eral regulations c:ontair1ed in Part 105, Subchapter D,. Chapter 1, CF'R, Title lt-0.. Administrative procedures and inter- agcncy discussions have delayed t}1e sch~duling and calling of this 11earinp:. Time e:.nd funding constraints necessitate that thi[3 :·ie~1rinL~ be \el.d at the earliest pcssible date. ~ 19/5 STATE WATER ·RESOURCES CONTROL BO/m.D !\ I .:~c...-r~A"'~ .... ~ I. 'v.,.,,r< ..... ~ Bill B. Dendy . \ E~ecutive Officer Enclos·ure I H. G. OSBORNE n1RECTOR C>F ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY 400 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST SANTA ANA, ~ALIFORNIA Apr i 1 1 , 197 5 TE LE PHONE: 8H·2300 AREA CODE 714 MAIL ING ADORE 55: P. O. BOX 4048 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 FILE The Honoraple Board of Supervisors County of Orange Administration Building Santa Ana, California SUBJECT: Upper Newport Bay --Proposed watershed planning (All Districts) SYNOPSIS: The State Water Resources Control Board will hold a hearing on ·April 3,° 1975 to· receive reaction to·a proposal to identify parts. of Ventura, Los Angeles, Riverside·and San B~rnardino Counties, and all of Orange as a P.L. 92-500 Section Planning Area. SCAG may be designated as the Planning Agency. SCAG~ if named, could contract with local agenci.es for .part.s of the planning. Two types of local agencies appear suitable for contracting with SCAG for Upper Newport Bay Watershed Pl.anning. County position for April 3 hearing is requested. , Gent 1 emen:. By letter dated December 17, 1974 (copy enclosed) your board's attention was called to the possibility of obtaining a grant for a water quality control study . of Upper Newport Bay Watershed under Section 208 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended in .1972 (P.L.92-500). On that date your board extended an invitation for briefing by the staff of the State Water Resources Control Board. The-briefing was conducted on January 29, 1975; board interest was ex- pressed ~nd your writer instructed to keep the board knowledgeable on events. Notice has been received of a hearing by the St.ate Water Resources Control Board to begin 1:30 PM on April 3, 1975 in Los Angeles to receive statements and argu- ments on the State Board proposal to identify the following as a Section 208 waste treatment management planning area: · All of Orange County and those portions of Ventura, Los Angeles, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties lying within the Santa Clara, Los Angeles and Santa Ana Rivers basins planning areas, and that portion of Riverside County lying northwest of the Santa Margarita River sub-basin and southerly of the Santa Ana River Basin Planning Area. Upon designation as a planning area under Section 208 and approval by EPA, a grant could be obtained for planning along the 1 ines outlined in the December 17, 1974 The Honorable Board of Supervisors Page 2 Jetter to your board. In addition to identification of the boundaries of the planning area, Section 208 of the federal act requires the designation of a "single representative organization, including elected officials from local governments or their designees, capable of developing effective area-wide waste treatment management plans· for such area.H While not a part of the State Board announcement of the hear"ing, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is being considered for the organi- zation to be identified in compliance with the above requirement. SCAG has, in fact, previously applied to the State Board for sµch designation but no direet action has been taken up to this time. SCAG, if designated, does not plan to perform the planning directly but hopes for its accomplishment by local units of government by agreement with SCAG. Your board's previous interest in 208 planning has been focused on the Upper Newport Bay and its watershed, constituting 20% of Orange County"s land area and including rapidly ~xpanding cities. In the December 17, 1974 letter, emphasis was placed on the general purpose governments· (cities and the county) with their wide powers as logical·candidates for designation as the pl~nning agency. A joint powers agency formed by agreement between the county and the six cities lying entirely or partially within the watershed woulq possess all the legal capability required and could contract with SCAG, if SCAG becomes the officially designated planning agency. ' In Orange County, the county and cities have·played a minor role in treatment and disposal of waste water. In the northwesterly half of the county, the several County Sanitation Districts dominate the field.· In the southeasterly half, several California Water Districts formed by large land holding interests to permit urban- ization of their lands are dominating the waste water scene. It is being proposed by the Irvine Ranch Water District (a California Water District) that a legal entity including water and sewering agencies be formed to contract with SCAG for the Upper Newport Bay watershed planning, if SCAG is designated by the Stat~ Board. Possible me~bers suggested are: Irvine Ranch Water District County Sanitation Distri~t No. 5 County of Orange Orange County Flood Control District Orange County Water District State of California (Dept. of Fish & Game) Applications for grants by a designated planning organization must contain, among other items: "A statement by the applicant that prov1s1ons have been, or will be made for an Areawide Planning Advisory Committee which must The Honorable Board of Supervisors Page 3 include representatives of the state and public and may in- clude representatives of the U.S. Departments of Agriculture, Army, and the Interior and such other federal and local agencies as may be appropriate in the opinion of EPA, the State and the applicant agency." (Sect. 34.1051-2(a) of lnterim·Regulations). Under the proposed joint powers arran·gement between the county and watershed cities, the.sewering and water districts and Department of Fish and Game woald be repre- ser:'ted on t·he Advisory Committee·. In the proposal advanced by Irvine Ranch Water District, the watershed cities would be Advisory Committee ~embers. Fol lawing designation of· the planning organization and approval of the planning ·grant, the completed plan must be submitted within .two years to EPA with the · certified approval' of the State Water Resources Control Board •. Of particular interest on the Upper Newport Bay watershed are certain plan requirements as ·fol lows: 11 (c) The i dent i fi cation of requ·i red urban storm water runoff control system. · (d) The establishment of construction of priorities for treatment ·works for the fi-ve year period following the years of plan approval and a proposed schedule of completion of major treat- ment works over the 20-year period following submission of the pl~n. (e) The establishment of a regulatory program to: (1) Provide that waste treatment management shall be oh an areawide basis and provide identification and evaluation of and.control or treatment-for all point and non-point sources of pollution, including inplace or accumulated pollution sources, as shall be required under guidelines publish~d by the Administrator. (2) Regulate the location, modification, and construction of ~ny facilities within such area which may result in any discharge in such area including, as appropriate, regu- lation of any future increase in waste loads and sources; and .•• (f) The identification of those agencies necessary to (1) construct, operate, and maintain all facilities required by the plan, and (2) otherwise carry out the plan; (g) A process to (1) identify, if appropriate, agriculturally and silvicu1tura11y related non-point sources of pollution, includ- ing runoff from manure disposal areas, and from land used for -------- The Honorable Board· of Supervisors ~ Page. 4 livestock and· crop production, and (2) set forth pro- cedures and methods (including land use requirements) to control to the extent feasible such sources: (i) A process to (1) identify construction activity related sources of pollution, and (2) set forth procedures and methods (including land use requirements) to control to the extent feasible such sources; · (k) A process to control the disposition ·of all residual waste generated ~n such area or imported in~o such area which could affect either surface or groundwater.quality; (1) A process to control the disposal of pollutants on land or in subsurface excavations within such area to protect gr.ound and surface water quality; (m). The identification of all major ·alternative measures, in- cluding enforcement activities, financing,"·land use and other deve]opment controls and regulatory.actions, admin- istrative and management authorities and pract·iCes necessary to carry out each of the alternatives, and selection of the recommended system; · (n) The period of time necessary·to carry out the plan and major alternatives within such time, and ~conomic, social and en- vironmental impacts of carrying out the plan and major alternatives within such time; (p} Certification and description of public participation, in the planning process and adoption of the plan, in accordance with Part 105 o.f·this Chapter;. and (q} ·Recommendations by governing bodies of local governments having responsibility for, or which would be directly affect- ed by, implementation of the plan and having jurisdiction in the planning area as to State certification and EPA approval · of the p 1 an • Concurrently with the submission of the plan to EPA, the State Water Resources Control Board designates one or more waste treatment management agencies for the designated area. The waste treatment management agency must have individually in its component members or in ~ggregate adequate authority for the following: "(A) to carry out appropriate portions of an areawide waste treat- ·ment management plan developed under subsection (b) of this section; (B) to manage effectively waste treatment works and related facilities serving such area in conformance with any plan required by sub- section (b) of this section; The Honorable Board of Supervisors Page 5 "(C) directly or by contract, to design and construct new works, and to operate and maintain new and existing works as re- quired by any plan developed pursuant to subsection (b) of this section; (D) to accept and utilize grants, or other funds from any source, for waste treatment man~gement purposes; (E) to raise revenues, including the assessment of waste treatment charges; (F} to incur s~ort-arid long-term indebtedness; (G) to a$sure in implementation of an areawide waste treatment management plan that each participating community·pays its proportionate share of treatment costs; (H) to refuse to receive any wastes from any municipality or sub- divi~ion thereof, which does not comply wi.th any provisions of an approved plan under this section applicable to.such area; and (I) .to accept ·for tr~atment industrial wastes.11 After EPA approval of the plan and the waste treatment management agency, all grants for construction of publicly owned treatment works under section 201 of P.L. 92-500 must be made to the waste treatment management agency and in conformity with the plan. In addition, no permit will ·be issued under s'ection 401 of P.L. 92-500 for any point source discharge which is in conflict with the plan. RECOMMENDATION: Determine position of the County for the April 3, 1975 State Water Resources Control Board hearing~ HGO:mn cy to: Cities of Irvine, Costa Mesa, Santa Ana, Tustin, Newport Beach and Orange Irvine Ranch Water District ,,et>Unty Sanitation District No. 5 Orange County Water District Sta~e of California, Dept. of Fish & Game Respectfully iubmitted, /~ H. G. Osborne, Director l\U;l...;L. .J/ U/ /. day of Agenda It-am No. \ ""\ .. JOINT EXERCISE OF Pm·:ERS l\GRLEMENT CREATING NEWPORT-IRVINE WASTE-MANJ\GEME!JT PLAIJiH!~G AGENCY (NIWA) THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into-as of the -------, 1975, by and between tre IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT,. and one or more of the following entities, to-wit: (a) County of Orange; (b) County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County; and (c) Orang~ County Water District. r· R E C I T A L S : A. The hereinabove named parties include within their existing boundaries territory including or related to the San Diego Creek Watershed or Newport B?Y or both. B. Irvine Ranch Water District is undertaking ~he formulation of regional plans for faciiities for the collection, treatment, disbosal and reclamation of wastewater from within the hereinabove described area which in part is tributary" to Newport Bay, as well ·as other areas which partly are within the boundaries of the Orange County Water District, all of which are entities being situated in the County of Orange. C. The·parties to this Agree~ent hereto possess the power and authorization to conduct planning and other studies into water quality and other matters in the San Diego Creek Watershed area inclusive o~ the power and authorization to accomplish -1- 3/11/7' 3/13/7 ! 3./2 3/7 ~ •. i ~reawidc waste treatment management planning as an ontioing process to the.extent and ih the manner described in Section 208 o~ the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (the Act) either . directly or in conjunction with another entity or entities. D. The caiifornia Regional Water Quality Control Board -Santa Ana Region has requested that the State Water ~esources Control Board of the State of California pursuant to the authority delegated to it by· the Governor of the State of California designate the San Diego Cre~k-Newport Bay Area as an area which as a result of urban-industrial concentrations or other factors has substantial water quality problems thereby. necessitating the establishment of an areawide waste treatment management planning process as provided for in Section 20.8 of the Act and regulations. promulgat~d pursuant .to the Act. E. An areawide waste treatment management planning process and resulting plan for t~e San Diego Cieek-N~wport Bay Arca may .be compatible with ascertaining the existence of and solution to any existent or future water quality and other matters that now or in the future may be existent and such an effort can be achieved most effectiv~ly through the cooperative action of the parties to this Agreement, operating through an entity established by this joint exercise of.pow~rs agreement either directly or in conjunction with another entity or entities. F. Each of the parties is authorized to contract with each of the other parti~s to this Agreement for the joint exercise of the common powers set forth herein pursuant to the authorization set forth in Article I, Chapter 5, Division ·7, Title 1 of the Government Code. -2- G. The parties to this Agreement and the entity hereby created is intended to be and is comprised to be re- prescntative of local governmental agencies in the San Diego Creek Watershed-Newport Bay Area as contemplated by Section 208 of the Act and 40 CFR 126.11. H. The governing body of the entity hereby cstabli:;hcd except as to the Director of the Department of Fish and Game or his designee shall be comprised of persons holding.elective offices on the governing body of the Member Agency whom they represent on the governing body of the entity established by this Agreement, which governing boqy shall be reflective of the local govern~ental agencies in the hereinabove described area. I. The entity established by this Agree~ent shall have a planning ~recess her~in·provided· for under way at the earliest possible date which in the.event it requests and is so designated under Section 208 of the Act ~hall in no event be later than one year after its designation pursuant to Section 208 of the Act eit~er directly or in conjunction with another entity or entities. J. The entity established by this Agreement if 1t requests and is so de~ignated shall complete the initial area wide waste treatment management plan contemplated by Section 208 . of the Act at the earliest possible date and in no event later than two years after corrunencement of the ·planning· process. K. The entity established by this Agreement shall have . . a broad comprehensive planning capability relative to accomplishing the purpose herein set forth as set forth in Section 208 of the Act and as described in ~O CFR 126.11. -2-a- II COVENAN'l1 S In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, the parties hereto qgrce as follows: III PURPOSE AND POWERS 1. Agency Crea~ed. There is hereby created a public . entity to be known as the ''Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency (NIWA)". The Agency is formed by this Agreement pursuant to the provisions of Article I, Chapter 5, Division 7, Title I of the Government Code of the State of California. The Agency shali he a public entity separate from the parties hereto. 2. Purpose of the Agreement: Common Powers to b~ Exercised. Each member. has the common power to conduct planning and other studies in~o wate~ quality and other matters .. in the Sa~ Diego Creek Watershed area inclusive of the power and. autho~ization to accomplish an areawide waste treatment man~gement plan ~~n an on going continuous basis to the extent and as provided for in Section 208 of tne Federal Water Pollution Control Act and regulations promulgated pursuant thereto either directly or in conjunction with another entity or entities. The purpose of this Agreement is to jointly. ex~rcise the foregoing common power in the manner hereinafter set forth. 3. Powers. The Agency shall have the power in its own name to do any of the following: (a) To exercise jointly the co~~on powers of lts- members to_ conduct planning and other studies into -3- water quality and other matters in the San Diego Creek Watershed area including the accomplishment on an on ongoing basis as provided for in Section 208 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and regulations promulgated pursuant thereto of an areawide waste treatment management planning process either directly or in conjunction with another entity or entities; (b) To make and enter into contracts; (c) To contract for the services of engineers, attorneys, planners, financial consultants, and separate and apart therefrom to employ such other persons, as it deems ne·cessary; (d) To acquire, construct; ~anage, maintain and operate any buildings, works, or ·improvements; ' (e) To acquire, hold and dispose of property; (f) To incur debts, liabilities or obligations subject to limitations herein set forth; (g) To sue and be sued in its own name; (h) To apply for an appropriate grant or ·grants. under any federal, state or local programs for assistance in developing any of its programs including but not limited to an area wide waste management planning process to the extent and as described in ·the Act and regulations pro~ulgated pursuant to the Act and any other applicable local,state or federal statutory or regulatory provisions or any combination of the foregoing; _4.:. .. .. . (b) 11 .l\.gcncy" i:teans the Newport-Irvine Haste- .Management Planning ·.t\gcncy (l\: i Wl\) to~r:rncd pursuant to this Agreement. (c) 11 Bbard" or "Board of Directors" means the (d) governing body of the ~gcncy. 11 Member" or ·n Party" means c.J.ch of the .p;lrtiQs \·.rhich beco_me a signatory to th.is Agreement, accepting the rights and.~bligation~ of the Agency hereunder, .including any public en; i ty .exccutin'J u:l addendum of the original :!gree~·:tcnt as heri11aftcr provided. (e) "Particirnting ;·,1c1 ')er" means a member that has or will acquire rights c:ind assume obligations in com 'Ct;.ion with a particular project. (f-) "Participath1g Director" n~eans the elected director or director appointed in li6u of election, represent i.ng a participci ting member which per~;on shal'l hold an elective office on the govcrnin<J body of such particul~r pa~ticipating mc~ber. rhe f orcgoinq shall not pcrto.in to the Director of the DcpurtmL'nt of Fish ~ind G;unc or his de~-;ic_:n(~C. -5- (<J) . ""F:i.:~<~<1 l Yl~ar" meons July l~il:. to .-i1Hl i.nclt~din<J !:he followi11g .June 30th. (h) "Facility" or "Facilities" rnccms any building, \·,'orks, or· irnprOVCi'.1cnt acquired or constructc~cl by ,~(Jcncy. (i) "Project" 1;:1·!ans the ·L1cili ties con:-; LructQcl by (j} "General Bud9ct" means the approved budget ap- plicable to the expenses of admin{stiation of the Agency. . . IV. ORGANIZATION 5. Membership. rl'he meml~ers of _the Agency shall be each public entity which has executed or herc~fter ·executes this Agrcoment; or any addenda, amendment or supple1aent thereto, w~thin the period of time specified in Section 7 of this A~reement a~d which has not, pursuant to the provisions hereof, ·withdia~n therefrom. ' 6. Names. The names, particular ca~acities, and addresses of the members at any time shall be shown on Exhibit "B", attach :·'1 hereto, as ~~~nended or supplemented from time to time. 7. Designatio!1 of Directors. Within thirty (30) days after the execution of this Agreer. .mt, each member including the Director ·of the Department of Fish and Game shall designate and appoint one person to act as its director on the Board~ Each member shall also appoint one alternate director whose name shall be on file· with the Board and who may assume all rights and duties of the absent director representing the appointing member. -5-a-· .. Each director and alternate shall hoJ.d office from t:hc fi.c;t : rnccting of the Board after his appointrnr:nt. until hi.s !>UCC()!.;~;or is selected. Directors and alternates ~>hall serve .:it the · plca.'sure of the appointing member and may be removed at any tj rnc, with or without cause, in the sole dis~rction of said ap~ointing member. Except as to ·the Director· of the Department of Fi[.Jh and Game or his designee, each director or alternate shall be a member of the governing board of the appointing members duly elected or appoint~d in lieu of election ·to sue~ elective public office. A director may receive such compensation fro~ the Agency for his services as may from time to time be .est~blished by the board.· A direct~r may be reimbursed for expens~s ~ncurred by such director in the conduct of the busine~s•of the Agency. Any suGh appointm~nt of such persons shall evidence and be conclusive thdt such positions are compatible and the offic0s of Director and Al- . ternate Director. are intended and in fact establi~:hed on. such b~1sis. In the event that ono of the her0.i.nabovc named entities has not executed.this Agreement and so appointed a Director and Alterna~e Director within forty-five (45) consecutiv~ days following written notice given in the manner hereinafter provided of the execution of this Agreement by any two of the hereinabove designated entities, such non action shall be deemed an election not to participate herein at this time~ Subsequent participation herein may be accomplished in .accordance with Section ~6 of this Agr~emcnt. -6-. . . 8. Principal Off.ice. The principal office of the l\gcncy shall be es~ablished by the board. The board is hereby _granted . full power and authority to change said ~rincipal office from one location to another in the County of Orange. Any change shall be noted by the secretary under this section but shall not be considered an amendment to this Agreement. 9. Meetings. The board shall meet at the principal office of the.Agency or at such other place as .may be designated by the board. The time and place of regular meetings of the board shall be determined by resol~tion adopted by the board, a copy of such resolution shall be furnisl-ied to each party hereto. Any meeting of a project committee shall be deemed to be a meeting of the Agency ~ shall be open to all directors. Regular, adjourned and specia.l meetings shall be called and held in the manner as provided in Chapter 9, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (commencing at Section 54950) . 10. Quo_~uni. A rnajori ty of the directors sha·ll con- stitute a quorum for the purposes of the transa·ctipn of business relating to the Agency. A majority· of the pirectors, but not less than two (2), shall constitute a quorµrn for the purposes of the transaction of business of the Agency on·matters relating to each project in which not all of the parties are participating. 11.. Powers and Lirni tations Thereon. All of the powers -7- and authority of the Agency shall be exercised by the board, sub- ject, however, to the reserve right of the members as herein set forth. Unless otherwise provided her~in, each director or partici- patinq director shall be entitled to one vote. and a vote bf the majority of the Board qualified to vote may adopt any motion, resolution, ordinance, or order and take any other action they deem appropriate to carry forward· the objectives of the Agency or of a project committee. 12. Minutes. The secretary of t~e Agency shall cause to be kept minutes of regular, adjourned regular and special meetings of the board, and shall cause a copy of the members hereto. 13. · Rules. The board may adopt from· time to time such. rules and regulations for the conduct of its affairs as may be ~ required. ~ 14. Vote or Assent of Members. The vote, assent, or approval of members in any matter requiring such vote, ass~nt, or approval hereunder shall be evidenced by a cert{f ied copy of the iesolution of the governing board of such member filed with the Agency. 15. Officer$. There shall besclected from the member- ship of· the board, a chairman and a vice chairman. shall appoint a secretary who may be a director. The board The treasurer of the Irvine Ranch Water District shall be the treasurer of the Agency, to be the depositary and have custody of all money of the Agency from whatever source. The auditor or officer having similar responsibilities of the Irvine Ranch Water District shall be the auditor of the Agency and shall draw all -8- wo.rrants Clnd pay dcrnl1nds llgainst the l\gcncy approved by the boo.rd. In additiofl, the boo.rd shall have the power to o.ppoint such addi- tional officers as it deems necessary. The treasurer and auditor hereby designated may be changed by the consent of all directors. ':'he chairman, vice chairman, and secretary shall hold office for a period of one year commencing July 1st .of each ·and every fiscal year; provided, however, the first chair~an, vice chairman and secretary appointed shall hold office from the dat~ of appointment to June 30th of the ensuing iiscal year. Any officer, ernploy~e or agent of the board may also be an officer, employee or agent of any of the members. The app~intment by the board of such a person shall be evidence that the two P.Ositions are compatible. The public officer or officers or persons who have charge of, handle, or have any access to any property of the Agency shall be b6nded and the amount of their bond shall be de~ignated in the applicable budget and thus fixed. All of the privileges and inunurii ties from liability, exemption from laws'· ordinances and rules, all pension, relief, disability, workmen's compensation and other benefits which apply to the activity of officers, agents, or employees of any of the members when performing their respective functions shall apply to them to the same degree and extent while engaged in the performance . of any of the functions and other duties under this Agreement. None of the officers, agents, or employees appointed by the board shall be deemed, by reason of their employment by the board, to be employed by any _of the members or, ~y reason of their employment by the board, to be subject to any of the requirements of such members. -9- v. J>J,7\Ni'n NG 16 • · ?_~l~~~-!2-~!.1_9-__ .£.~.L~-~~Y· In keeping with the purpose of th is .l\grccrncnt, the mcm:Ucrs hereby authorize the bou.rd in its discretion to rcqu,Qst clcsigna t ion of the S;1n Diego CrL.::r~k--Ncwport ·Day area l1 [.; an a_rea having water quality problems as def.incd _in Section 208 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and t~at the Agency be designated as the areawide waste treatment management planning agency for such areas either directly or in conjunction w.ith another entity or entities. VI. BUDGETS ~ND P.l\YMENTS 17. General Budget .. Within q1irty (30).consccutive ctllcndar days after the· first meeting of t~e board, a general budget shall be· • adopted for the balance of the fiscal year and the ensuiriq fiscal year. The initial budget and each succeeding·budget shall include the follo·.ving: (a) the general administrativ~ expenses of the Agency to be incurred during t~e period cover~d by the budget; nnd (b) the allocation ambng thS members of the ~mounts i· ~cessary to cover the general budget expenditures. The expenditures required in the initial budget (from forination to June 30, 1976) sh~ll be shared equally. If after the initial budge~, the board provid~ ; an alJocation to the members on ~ome basis other than equal amou~ts, the general budget must ~c approved by the unanimous consent of all of thL directors. After the first full fiscal year, at or prior to each June meeting of the board, -a· general budget ~;h~ll be adopted for the ensuing fiscal year. -10-.. 18. Pr.oject nudge ts. In addition to the general ·budget, ·the board may·budgct at any time for the study, implementation or construction of any spccif ic project proposed to be constructed by the Agency. Eac~ project budget shall include the following: (a) the administrat{ve expenses allocated to the project during planning and construction; (b) the cost of studies and planning for the project; (c) the cost of the enginee:r:ing and constructio.n of the project; (d) the allocation among the participating members, the total project costs; (e) an estimate of annual mainteDance and operating expenses; and (f) a formula for.allocating annual maintenance and operating expens~s. ' After the board approves a project budget, it shall be sub- mitted to each member who has expressed a desire to participate and is to be obligated for the payment of any amount thereunder and the Agency shall not incur any expense for the project ·until the project budget h~s·been approved by the governing body· of each· of the proposed participating members. In the event a project budget is not approved, the cost of preparing the budget shall be divided among the proposed participating members in accordance with the proposed allocation of the total project costs. 19. Maintenance and Operation Budgets. For each project maintained and operated by the Agency, a maintenance and operation ......., budget shall be prepared and approved at or prior to ·each June meeting of the board for the ensuing fiscal year. Said budget -11-. . shail .inclu<lc the following: (a) the expenses of maintilining th'c prpjcct; (b) the expenses of operating the project; (c) an estimate of income from operation$, if any; (d) the allocation of maintcn~ncc and o0cration expenses among the participating members in accordance with the formula set forth in t~e approved project bud~et. A maintenance and operat~ng budget must bci approved by two-thirds (2/3) of the directors or by two-thirds (2/3) of the participating directors if the budget affects less than the entire membership. Copies of each operating budget shall be mail~d to each .participating member within thirty (30) days of its adoption. In regard to payment of. ·.xpenses of the l\9ency, i.t is ~ agreed as follows: (a) all operational costs and maintenance costs directly related to use of the facilities, including neces- sary improvements, repairs, adjustments, replacements and incidental ·accounting and administrative costs in connection therewith shall be paid by each member. using the facilities in pr~portion to' their use; and (b) the maintenance costs not directly related to use of the facilities, including necessary improvements, repairs, adjust- ments, replacements and extraordinary or standby maintenance, and incidental accounting and administrative costs in connection therewith, shall be paid by the participating members in proportion to their respective percentage share of th~ costs of said facilities as herein provided. Any change of the foregoing may be made by the unanimous consent of all of the participating.members. -12- 20. !·:ffc~=-t;. __ of Fililurc of .l\_12_~E~:wa~_f _ _pud~ct. If, after ~ one hundred. twenty (120) consecu-tivc calendar days from the first submission of a· general bud~et,thc budget fails to attain the req11ircd vote, the consenting directors of members, in the case of the general bu<l~et, or the conscntin0 members, in the case of a project budyet, may treat the.refusal of the repre~entative director or member to approve the budget as a request"for a withdrawal from t1.ie Agency, in the case of· failure to : ,pprove a general budget, or from the project, but not from.the Agency, in the case of failure to approve a project budget, by such member and the remaining members may thereafter, upon giving the non-consenting member thirty (30) consecutive days prior written notice, proceed with adoption of a revised budget and the non-consenting member shall not be obligated for future debts of the Agency or of the project, as the case may be, nor shall it receive any benefits therefrom. The forego~ng is subject to the provisions of Section 35 hereof. 21. Expenditures for tne App:t 0v·ed Budget. All expendi- tures.·within the designations arid limitatio~s· of appr0ved general~ project or maintenance and operation budgets shall be made on the authorizatiori of a majority of the directors for general budget expenditures or of a majority of the directors of the participat- ing members for othe~ expenditures. · No cxpenditur~s in excess of those budgeted shall be made without the unanimous consent and approval of all of the directors representing the member affected by the budget under consideration. 22. Payment of l\mounts Due. Amounts required to be paid -13- by any member shall be due and payable !arty-five (45) days -~ after receipt of billing therefor from the board. 23. Rcimburscmenf of Funds. G~ant funds received by the Agency from any federal, state or local agency to pay for budgeted expenditures for which the Agency has received all or a portion of said funds from its membe~s shall be proportionally paid to said members to reimburse the members for the funds advanced to the Agency for the construction of the facili~ies for which grant money has been received .. VII. BOND FINANCING 24. Revenu~ Bonds. The board shall have the power al·;d authority to issu~ revenue bonds for the purposes now or hereinafter provided· for ~n this Agreement as s~t forth in subparagraph 3(j) "-"" hereof;. provided, such subsequent powers properly constitute the joint exercise of a common power as required by law. Any such revenue bonds shall be issued in accordance with the procedure and requirements set forth in Ar~icle 2, Title 1, Division 7· of the Government Code of the State of California (commencing at Section 6540) and to the ~xtent applicable·, the Revenue Bond Law ·of 1941. Any election or referendum provided for in Section 54307.1 of the Government Code shall be held separately within each entity which is participating in ~he project to be constructed with the proceeds of the revenue bonds proposed to be issued. VIII. PROJECT CONSTRUCTION 25. Acquisition and Construction of Projects. No project -14- shall be acquired or constructed by the-board without the unanimous consent of every member, or if it i~ a project of less than all of the members, the unilnimous consent of all of the participating members. Approval of a project budget by all of thci participating members shall constitute consent for the acquisition and construe- tion of the project. 26. Project Members. If it is determined that a proposed project of less than all of the members, the pa~tictpating directors for each project shall constitute a subcommittee of the board ref erred to as the " Project Committee:. All actions by a project committee shall be deemed actions of the Agency and shall be taken in the ::.-iame of the Agency, ho.wever, only· the participating members of a project shall have rights and obliga- tions in said project as herein provided. IX. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF FACILITIES 27. Maintenance and Operation of Facilities. The board, or the project corrunittee, as the case may be·, shall determine prior to the acqu~sition or construction of any project, whether or not the Agency shall maintain and/or operate such facilities. If the Agency is to maintain and/or operate such facilities, it shall do so in an efficient and economical manner, and in a manner not detrimental to the other members. It is the intent of the· parties that any project may be maintained and operated in the name of the Agency although, as herein provided, a majority of the participating directors shall make all determinations of the Agency· in connection therewith. -15- If it is <lctcrmin.cd that one or more of the members r;hall maintain '-"' and/or operate sai<.1 facilities, said members shc:ill by written agreement consent thereto prior to the acquisition or construction thereof. x. ACCOUNTING nND AUDITS 28. Accounting Procedures. Full books and accounts shall be maintained for the Agency in accordance with practices estab- lished by, or consistent with, those utilized by· the Controller of the State of California for like ~ublic cntiiies. In particu- lar, the Agency's controller fand treasurer shall comply strictly with requirements of the statute governing joint powers agencies, Chapter S,, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code commencing at Section 6500. 29. Audit. The records and accounts of the Agency shall be audited_ annually by an independent cert~f~ed public accountant and copies pf such other reports shall qe'filed with the County Auditor, th~ State Controller and each participating member within· six (6) months of the end of the fiscal year under examination. XI • . PROPERTY RIGHTS 30. Project Facilities. All facilities constructed or acquired by the Agency shall be held in the name of the Agency for the benefit of the memqership of the Agency in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Capacity rights in respect to · project facilities shall be held for the benefit of the participating members in proportion to each member's agreed percentage of capacity rights in such project facility unless otherwise agreed to in -16-. . writing by sai~ participatirig members. It is the intent of .the foregoing proyision that the l\gency shall not acquire any.unallocated· capacity ·rights in any facility for disposal or use, except for the bcnef it of the participating members in proportion to their original percentage of capacity rights in said facility. Capacity rights may not be reallocated, sold; leased or assigned without the written consent of all participating members in a project. 31. Distribution of Assets and Termination of Agency. To the extent that any f~nds (or property in lieu 6f funds) received from any member are used for the acquisition or construction of facilities, the same shall be allocated annually on the books of the Agency to the .credit of said contribut.ing member. Upon ter- mination or dissoluti9n of the Agency herein c~eated, the facilities, and any funds, in possession of the Agency at such time shall be· ._,, distributed in kind or sold, and the proceeds thereof distributed ~. to the members at the time of termination'as their interests appear on the books of the Agency. 32. Liabili~ies. Any liability incurred by the Agency during the course of its existence shall be discharged fro~ payments hereby agreed to be made to the Agency by each of the par~ies hereto in proportion to their contribution or approved participation in facilities of the Agency for which the liabi~ity is attributable. Except as hereinabove provided,. the debts, liabilities, and obli- gations of the Agency shall be the debts, liabilities or obligations of the Agency alone and not of the parties to this Agreement. -17-. . XII. FORMl\'1:,ION, 'l'ERM __ , _'l'ERMINl\'l'IO~-' w1:~!!_D~Mv~-~ 33. Term. The Agency shall continue until this Agreement is rescinded or terminated as herein provided. 34. Rescission or Termination. This Agreement may be rescinded and the Agency terminated by written consent of all members. 35. Withdrawal. Any member may withdraw frpm the ~gen~y at any time upon giving each of the members one.htlndrcd and twenty (129) days written notice prior to the end of a fiscal.year; pro- viqed, however, in the event the withdrawing member has any rights in any facility or obligations to the Agency, said member cannot sell, lease or transfer said rights or be relieved of its obligations~ except its obligation to pay its share of operation and maintenance costs directly related to the use of the facilities, without the execution of a written agreement executed by it and all members affected by such withdrawal. The Agency may no"t; sell,.· lease, trans- fer, or use any rights of a membei who has withdrawn without first cbtaining the written· consent of the withdrilwn member. Upon termina- tion, a withdrawn member will be treated like all other members in regard to the provisions of Section.31 hereof. 36. Admission of New Members. It is recognized that public entities, oth~r tha~ the original members, hereinabove enumerated may wish to participate in the Agency. Additional public entities may become members of the Agency upon such terms and con- ditions as provided by the board and the unanimous consent of each existing member of the Agency, other·than those hereinabove enumerat~d -18- ·~ as cv i<lcnccd by the cxccu ti on' of a writ ten 11ddcndum to thi"s l\<J rccment, signed by all of the members inc.lud.ing ·the additional· incmber. 37. Amendments. .rrhis Agreement may be umcndcd only by the unanimous vote of all members. 38. Notice. Any notice or jnstrurnent required to be given or delivered by depositing the same in any United StQtes Post Office, registered or certified, postage prepaid, addressed to the addresses of the members as shown on Exhibit "B", shall be deemed to have been recieved by the party to whom the same is addressed at the expiration of seventy-two (72) hours after deposit of the same in the United States Post Office for trans- mission by registered or certified mail as aforesaid. 39. Date of Formation. The Agency shall exist at such time as this Agreement has been executed by the Irvine Ranch Water ..._.,, District anq any one or more of the entities enumerated herein·. 40. Arbitration. Any controversy 6r claim b~tween any two or more parties to this Agreement, or .between any ·such party or parties and the Agency, tn respect to the .Agency's operations,. or to any claims, disputes, demands, differences, controversies, or misunderstandings arising under, out of, or in ielation to this contract, or any breach thereof, shall be submitted to and deter- mined by arbitration. To.the ~xtent not inconsistent herewith, the rules of the American Arbitration Association shall p.pply. The party desiring to initiate arbitration shall give notice of its intention to arbitrate to every other.party to this Agreement and the Agency. Such notice· shall designate .. :.s "respondents" such -19- other pi:irtics us the initiating p.:irty intends to have bound by any U.Wilrd m.:ide therein. Any party not so dcsignc:itcd but which ·desires to join· in the arbitration may, within ten days of service upon it of such notice, file a response indicating its irilcntion to join in and to· be bound by the results of the arbitra- tion, and further designating any other parties it wishes to ·name as a respondent. Within twenty (20} days of the service of the initial demand for arbitration, the American Arbitration Associati~n, hereinafter referred to as "AAA" shall submit si'multaneously to the initiating party and to all parties named as respondents or filing a response therein, an identical list of name:; of persons chosen from the AAA National Panel of Arbitrators.which persons shall be,· to the extent possible, men first in the field 9f waste water disposal and reclamation as well as public law. Each party t~ the dispute ~ shall have seven days from the mailing date in which to cross of£ any names to which he objects, number th~ ~emaining names indicat~ ing the order of .his preference, and return the list to the AAA. If a party does not return the llst within the time specified, all persons named therein shall be deemed ~cceptable. From among the persons who have. been ~pproved on both lists, in accordanc~ with the designated order of mutual pre.ference, the AAA shall invite the acceptance of an arbitrator to serve. If th~ parties fail to agree 'upon one of the persons named, or if an· acceptable arbitrator is unable to act, or if for any other reason the ·appointment cannot be made from the submitted list, the AAA shall have the power to make the appointment of the arbitrator from other members of the -20-. . p;t11c.1. w.Llhoul: th~ ~;ul..1rni!;~:>ion of any .-idc.litional li~;t. The zirh i.T.r.-a Lor ~;hall <lcb~rrni ne the r i.CJhLs of the p.-n:t. .i.t~s in accurdancc with the law, <:1nd the award ~>hull be subject to review ;ls to Lhc urbitrator' s application of the law by any com:t havin<J ju r is di ct ion th c r co f , \·J h ct her or not · u n y rn is ta kc o £ l zi w ~ h 0 11 ; ){) p <~a r upon the face of the Zl\·mrd. As to all questions of f ZJ.cts, howc ver, the determination of the arbitrator shall be binding upon all parties and shall be final. ~ny party shall. be ~ntltlc~ to written findin~s of fact <ind conclusions of LM as to all issues determined by the award. Subject to the above limitations, the award shall ~c binding upon-all parties te the arbitration and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered in an~ court having ju~is- diction thereof. The arbitrator may, in ·his d1scretion, as part of the arbitratio~ award impose upon any one pariy or allocate among • two or more of the parties, the liability for the arbitration fees and expenses. Such allocable fees may include the initial admin- istration fees, fees for second and s~bsequent hearings, postpone- met;t fees I fees fQ.C Second and Subsequent hearings I postpOnCffiCnt . fees, and overtime fees. Alloc~ble expenses IL1ay include the expc_nses of producing witnesses, the cost of stenographic records, the cost 6f ~ny transcripts, travel expenses of the a~bitrator and Tribunal Administrator, the expenses of any witnesses, the costs of any proofs produced at the direct request of the arbitrator, and any other expenses relating directly to the arbitration. In the event of the failure of the arbitrator to provide for the allocation of such fees -21- ;· . . and expenses, the arbitration fees shall be divided equally between the parties and the expenses shall be borne by the party iricurring them. 41. Severance. If any section, subsection, se,ntence, clause or phrase of this Agreement, or the application thereof, to any of the members for any other person or circumstances is for any reason held ~nvalid, the validity.of the remainder of the agreement, or the application of such provision to the other members, or to any other persons or circumstances·, shall not be . . affected thereby. Each of the members hereby declares that it would have entered into this Agreement, pnd each section, subsec- tion, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fa~t that one or more sections, subections, sentences, clauses, or .phrases, or the application thereof,. to any member or any other person or circumstances be held invalid. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the· parties hereto have set their hands and seals by their respective office~s thereunto duly author- ized the day and year first hereinabove written. (signatures continued on page 23) IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT By~~-- By~~ -22-. . . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF OHl\Nt ~E COUNTY C11a1rman Board of Su-pcrvisors of Orange ~aunty, Ex Officio Governing Body of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange Co~nty W~ E. St. John, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Ex Of ficip Clerk of·County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County ORI~NGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT President Sec~etary comtTY OF ORANGE Chairman Board of Supervisors, County of Orange W. E~ St. John, Clerk of the Board of Superv·i sors, County of Orahge -23- MEETING DATE Marc h 26 , 1975 TIME 5:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1 .2 .3,5 ,6 ,7 & 11 DISTRICT 1 (DIEDRICH) •••• BATTIN······+---- (GARTHE) ······EVANS······· ------ RIMA········+ ---- (LANGLEY)···· ·SALTARELLI·· ------ DISTRICT 2 {i:~ING) •• ·····CHAPUT······~ ___ _ . ONS). ·.····CALLAHAN·... v ___ _ DIEDRICH)· ···CLARK· • • • • • • f ___ _ EVANS)······· GARTHE • • • • • • _____ _ GRAHAM) ·····YOUNG ·•••• ~ THOM)· ·······KAYWOOD····· i/ == ==== FOX)········ ·MAC KAIN···· -1_ ___ _ PERRY· • • • • • • ../ l SVALSTA~) ····SCOTT·······~==== JACKMAN) ····TEMPLE······ J DUNNE). ······WINN··· ••••• v == == ROOT) • • • • • • • ·WOOD· • • • • • • • _{ ____ _ DISTRICT 3 (MAC KAIN). • • • ·FOX· • • • • • • • • _{__ ___ _ AMO· · • • • • · · · / !NUIJENS) •• •• ·ARBISO····· • ~ == == COLLINS) ..••• BYRNE .... •·• ./ HOMRIGHAUSEN)cox ....•.••• -./----- CULVER.·····;----- (MEYER) •.....• DAVIS • • • • • • --T ---- (EVANS) •••••• GARTHE .•• • • • ~ ---- (THOM) •••••••• KAYWOOD·~~·· I == === lBLACKMAN) •••• MC KNEW J P/-. • v NEVIL) •••••.• GRAHAM •••••• ~ ---- ; 'OD) ········ROOT········~ ---- borEDR I CH) • • • ·SCHMIT· • • • • • -Y ---- LACAYO) • • • • • ·SONJ U • • • • • • • -Y----- STANTON) • • • ·SVALSTAD • • • ·----:? ---- COEN) • • • • • • ··WI EDER·· • • • • 0 == == DISTRICT 5 ~ RYCKOFF) ••••• MC INNIS •••• _./_ --_,,_· _ DIEDRICH) •••• RILEY ••••••• _,; ____ _ ROGERS •••.•• -'-___ _ DISTRICT 6 RIMA .. •• •••• _L -- (DIEDRICH) ····BATT! N • • • • · • ~ ___ _ (MC INNIS)···· ·STORE ······· _____ _ DISTRICT 7 ,/ LANGLEY •.••• SALTARELLI •• __ ---- ANTHONY) • • • • J3 URTON • •.••• _v ____ _ DIEDRICH)··· ·CLARK······._./ ____ _ (MC INNIS)···· ·DOS"f'At. • • •• • ._/ ____ _ JOINT BOARDS CDUNNE) .• ·····WINN •••.••. ( AMO · •••••.• NUIJENS)·····ARBISO ••.•. 1 DI EDR lCH) ····BATTIN· ...• ANTHONY) ····BURTON····· COLLllS) ·····BYRNE •••••. !LYONS ······ ·CALLAHAN ••. EWING······ ·CHAPUT •.•.. DIEDRICH).··· CLARK ..••.. HOMRIGHAUSEN)cox ••••...• CUL VER· .••. (MEYER)·· · · · · ·DAVI s •.••.• M€=+rm 1 s ) . . . .-.oos-T1tt.· • • • • COEN)········ DUKE··· .••• GARTHE) • · · • · • EVANS .••••• MAC K(i.I N) ••.. Fox .••••.•• EVANS).·····. GARTHE ••... COEN).······· GIBBS •.•... . GL:PelOJ~. • • (NEVIL).······ GRAHAM ••.• (TEMPLE) ····JACKMAN ••. 1 THOM)· • • • • · · · KAYWOOD .•• FOX)·········MAC KAIN .• RYCKOFF). ····MC INNIS .. (BLACKMAN). · · • MC KNEW · · · (GRAHAM) • · • • · YOUNG • • • • · PERRY· · · · •• (DIEDRICH).··· RILEY···· •. ~-..... ROGERS · • .•• (WOOD). · · • · • • • ROOT • • · • • • (LANGLEY).···· SALTARELLI . !DIEDRICH).··· SCHMIT •••. SVALST[\D). • • • SCOTT • • • •• LACAYO) • • • • • SONJU • • ..• MC INN Is).· · • STORE •..•• (STANTON).· · · • SVALSTAD .. (JACKMAN) · · · TEMPLE .•.. (coEN) ••...•.. W-IEDE ~··· .(ROOT)· ....... wobD ••..•. OTHERS HARPER '· SYLVESTER LEWIS CLARKE TAYLOR BROWN (GARTHE) • • .. 00EVANS ·...... ./ fr;;_ ____ , GLOCKNER····~ === == ,,, , ... (T~MPLE)·~·~ ~ • • · · -r -------~ ft l.-o JJ-,J NISSON EWING HOHENER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVENS DTS TRICT 11 . ~rr-l\Y-">rf"' ----- l J COEN • • • • • • • 0 DUKE • • • • • • • • ------ COEN • • • • • • • ·GIBBS • • •• • • • _!_ ---- DI EDRl CH) •••• SCHMIT·····._:!__ ---- '· DISTRICT 8 · MITCHELL····------ (JOHNSON) • • • • ·HOLM • • • • • • • • __ ---- (DIEDRICH)·· ··RILEY·······---- -- ~~6/w7~5-------------~--.~~- -- ----' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING ~arch 26, 1975 -5:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting held March 12, 1975, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date, in the Districts' offices. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation, the roll was called, and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each ~istrict's Board. DISTRICT NO. 1 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 2 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 3 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT no. 5 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 6 Directors present: Directors absent: ROLL CALL Robert Battin (Chairman), Vernon Evans, and Donald Saltarelli Kerm Rima Dale Chaput (Chairman), Michael Callahan, Ralph Clark, John Garthe, Robin Young, Miriam Kaywood, Leonard MacKain, Bob Perry, George Scott, Joe Temple, Donald Winn, and Frances Wood None Donald Fox (Chairman), Lowell Amo, Gilbert Arbiso, Jr., Edward Byrne, Phillip Cox, Norman Culver, Jesse Davis, John Garthe, Miriam Kaywood, Thomas ~cKnew, Beth Graham, Robert Root, Laurence Schmit, Sonia Sonju, and Bernie Svalstad Harriett Wieder Don ~cinnis (Chairman), Thomas Riley, and Howard Rogers None Robert Battin (Chairman pro tern) and John Store Kerrn Rima (Chairman) #1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 3/26/75 DISTRICT NO. 7 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 11 Directors present: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Donald Saltarelli (Chairman), John Burton, Ralph Clark, Don Mcinnis, Vernon Evans, and Joe Temple Francis Glockner Henry Duke (Chairman), Norma Gibbs, and Laurence Schmit Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary, Ray Lewis, William Clarke, John Thomas, Bruce Taylor, and Rita Brown Director Robert Nevil, Director Jess Perez, C. Arthur.Nisson, General Counsel, Walt Howard, Harvey Hunt, Milo Keith, Donald.Martinson, .Alex Bruce, and Dr. Frank Goddard * * * * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT () Appointment of Chairman pro tern Chairman Rima. DISTRICTS 1, 2 ,'3 & 7 Excerpts re Board Appointments received and filed Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Director Battin be appointed Chairman pro tern in the absence of Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the minute excerpts from the Cities of Tustin, Yorba Linda, Brea, Irvine, La Habra, and Orange he received and ordered filed; be seated as members of the and that the following representatives Boards: City District Tustin 1,7 Yorba Linda 2 Brea 2 3 Irvine 7 La Habra 2 Orange 2 7 Active Donald J. Saltarelli Dale T. Chaput Leonard MacKain Donald Fox John H. Burton Robin Young Beth Graham Joe Temple James Jackman -2- Alternate James G. Sharp Carolyn Peirce Ewing Donald Fox Leonard r~acKain Arthur W. Anthony Beth Graham Robert Nevil '"Tess Perez Joe Temple .& --- ,.. ' #1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 3/26/75 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Winn read from a Report of the report received frorn the California Joint Chairman Association of Sanitation Agencies summarizing the status of the Collective Bargaining Act for Public Employment (SB 275) recently introduced in the State Legislature. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Genera 1 t·:anage r The General Manager reported that the State Water Resources Control Board has been conducting hearings on construction grant priorities and that $61 million has been allocated to our Districts for 1975-76 and $47.5 million for 1976-77. Mr. Harper announced that Lee M. Nelson who had served as General Manager of the Districts from 1952 to 1966 passed away earlier in the week. ALL DISTRICTS Staff report re grant for Treatment Plant Facilities Plan and EIS including the 1 MGD JPL pilot plant project The staff reviewed the implementation plan regarding the·$3.5 million grant for development of a Treatment Plant Facilities Plan and Environmental Impact Statement including the 1 f·:GD Jet Propulsion Laboratory's (JPL) Activated Carbon Treatment Pilot Plant. The Districts submitted a project report in March ~f 1974 outlining a plan to meet Federal and State requirements which projected a capital outlay of $275 million by 1983. The State guidelines require action by the State Water Rescurces Control Bonrd (SWRCB) within 120 days of submittal. However, to date, the SWRCB has not acted. During tne past year, preliminary results from development of the JPL process have indicated that it is technically feasible and would result in considerable capital and operational cost savings for secondary treatment to meet the new regulations, if the pilot plant project proves the process to be as cost effective on a large scale as the test scale studies have indicated. In order to complete the required elements of the ~3.5 million planning grant, it is necessary to proceed with the Facilities Plan, Environmental Assessment and JPL pilot work to develcp the conclusions from which the Districts will construct the facilities to meet State and Federal discharge requirements. The tirr.etable reviewed by the staff allows for proving the feasibility of the JPL process and cor;:pletion of the master plan facilities on a tight schedule. Following the staff's review, the Chair recognized Dr. Frank Goddard of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory Division of the California Institute of Technology, who reviewed JPL's and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (HASA's) endorsement and participation in the project, and Mr. Harvey Hunt of John Carollo Engineers, during which the Board entered into a lengthy discussion of the implemer.tation plan, the professional services required to carry out the program, and the· fees therefor. The Board also discussed the matter of possible alternatives for_acco~plishing the required professional services. Following further discussion, the following actions were taken: -3- i-& #1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 3/26/75 ALL DISTRICTS Approving nEree~ent with John Carollo Engineers for prepara- tion of Treatment Plant Facilities Plan Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the proposal submitted by John Carollo Engineers, dated March 14, 1975, for preparation of Treatment Plant Facilities Plan, be received, ordered filed, and accepted; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors adept Resolution No. 75-45, authorizing execution of an agree- ment, in form approved by the General Counsel, for said services, on a per diem fee basis, for a total amount not to exceed $100,000 for treatment plant facilities plan, and $50,000 for pilot and test work. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and ~ade a part of these minutes. Director Temple requested that his vote as the City of Orange's representative for District 2 in the affirmative, and on behalf of the City's representative on District 7 in the negative be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Approvin~ agreement with J. B. Gilbert and Associates for preparation of EIS re Treatment Plant :Facilities tilan Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the proposal submitted by J. B. Gilbert and Associates, dated March 18, 1975, for preparation of Environmer.tal Impact Statement re Treatment Plant Facili~ies Flan, be received, ordered filed, and accepted; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-46, authorizing execution of an agree- ment, in form approved by the General Counsel, for said services, on a per diem fee basis, for a total amour.t not to exceed $60,000. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Approving agree~ent with John Carollo Engl nee rs for engineering services re design of reactivated carbon wastewater treat- ment plant pilct project Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the proposal of John Carollo Engineers, dated ~arch 17, 1975, for engineering services re design of reactivated carbon wastewater treatment plant pilot project, be received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-47, authorizing execution of an agree- ment for said services, on a per diem fee basis, for a total amount not t~ exceed $255,000. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ... ALL DISTRICTS Approving agreement with Cal Tech for services re JPL reactivated carbcn wastewater treatment process be received, ordered #1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 3/26/75 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Th.at the proposal subrni tted by California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, dated March 19, 1975, for services in connection with the JPL reactivated carbon wastewater treatment project, filed, and accepted; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-48, authorizing execution of an agreement, in form approved by the General Counsel, for said services, on a per diem fee basis, for a total amount not to exceed $280,000. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and.made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Engaging Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. as Districts* Auditors Director Root, Chairman of the Special Selection Committee for Audit Services, reviewed the activities of the Committee which interviewed firms to conduct the 1974-75 fiscal year audit of the Districts. Following his presentation, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the proposal of· Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., dated February 28, 1975, to provide audit services for the 1974-75 fiscal year audit, on a per diem fee basis, for a maximum amount not to exceed $10,000.00, be received, ordered filed, and approved, as recommended by the Special Selection Committee for audit services; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the staff be authorized to negotiate with the firm of Peat, Marwick, i·atchell & Co. regarding the possibility of a three-year audit agreement, as recommended by the Special Selection Committee for Audit Services, and report back to the Boards. ALL DISTRICTS Supporting CR~QC3 nosition in opposing 11 20d 11 planning area·enco~passir.g ~ost of Southern California The General Manager reviewed a resolution adopted by the California Regional W~ter Quality Control Eoard, Santa Ana Region, opposing identifica- ticn of a proposed area-wide planning area, pursuant to provisions of Section 208 of the 1972 amendments to the Federa,l Water Pollution Control Act, which would enco~pass most of Southern California. A proposal has been put forth that w9uld include into one area-wide planning designation all of Orange County and those portions of Ventura, Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties lying within the Santa Clara, Los Angeles, and Santa Ana River Basins, and that portion of Riverside County lying northwest of the Santa Margarita River sub-basin and southerly of the Santa Ana River Basin Planning Area. -5- 1 #1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 3/26/75 It appears that the only area in Orange County that may require a joint plnnning effort is the San Diebo Creek/Newport Bay Watershed. Following a discussion by the Board of the proposal and the Regional Board's resolutions, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-50 supporting the position of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, in opposing the identification of a proposed "Section 208" planning area described as: All of Orange County and those portions of Ventura, Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties lying within the Santa Clara, Los Angeles, and Santa Ana Rivers Basin planning areas, and that portion of Riverside County lying northwest of the Santa Margarita River sub-basin and south of the Santa Ana River Basin Planning Area and further requesting identification of the area described as the San Diego Creek/Newport Bay Watershed for "Section 208" planning programs and designation of an appropriate agency in that area to accomplish the plan, and that the remainder of the Santa Ana Region be undesignated. Director Burton, representing the City of Irvine, was authorized by the Boards to advise the Secretary of his vote on said resolution for entry into the record follo~ing direction from his Council. DISTRICT 1 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: _ That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. ~he Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:03 p.m., March 26, 1975. DISTRICT 2 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Direct ors of County Sanitation District l~o. 2 be adjourned. '!'he Chairman then declared the IT.eeting so adjcurned at 8:03 p.m., r~arch 26, 1975. DISTRICT 3 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:03 p.m., March 26, 1975. -6- r i DISTRICT 6 Adjournment #1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 3/26/75 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:03 p.m., March 26, 1975. DISTRICT 7 Receive, file, and accept proposal of Goode & Goode for appraisal services re right of way for Contract No. 7-6-7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the proposal submitted by Goode & Goode, Real Estate Appraisers, dated March 20, 1975, for appraisal services in connection with acquisition of right of way for Contract No. 7-6-7 Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 11 and a Portion of Reach 12, from Irvine Boulevard to Fairhaven, be received, ordered filed, and accepted; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be authorized to direct the appraisers to proceed with said work, on a per diem fee basis, for an amount not to exceed $7,500, in accordance with the rates stipulated in said proposal, as follows: Appraiser -$50 per hour Assistant -$25 per hour DISTRICT 7 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:04 p.m., March 26, 1975. DISTRICT 11 Receive and file comments re draft Uniform Connection and Use Ordinance, and refer to staff and General Counsel Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the comments of Kerr Glass Manufacturing Corporation dated February 13, 1975, in connection with the Districts' tentative draft of revised Uniform ordered filed, and Connection and Use Ordinance, be received, referred to staff and General Counsel. DISTRICT 11 Receive, file, and reject amended claim of Kelly Timothy Kellas re damage or injury involving Districts' vehicle Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the amended claim dated February 27, 1975, of Kelly Timothy Kellas filed by Charles A. Price, Attorney for Claimant, for alleged damage or injury incurred in an accident involving a District-owned vehicle, be received, ordered filed, and rejected, as recommended by the General Counsel. -7- #1,2,3,5,6, 1 & 11 3/26/75 DISTRICT 11 Approving License to Occupy Right of Way with Jack R. Fenton and Wayne R. Peterson Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-37-11, approving License to Occupy Right of Way with Jack R. Fenton and Wayne R. Peterson, a Partnership, and authorizing District No. 1 to execute said license, in form approved by the General Counsel. Certified copy of this resolution_ is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 11 Receive and file staff progress report on Treatment Plant Construction Projects and ordered filed. DISTRICT 11 Take under advisement tentative draft of revised Uniform Connection and Use Ordinance and authorizing informal hearings Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff progress report dated March 6, 1975, on Treatment Plant Construction Projects, be received Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the tentative draft of revised Uniform Connection and Use Ordinance, dated March, 1975, be received, ordered filed, and taken under advisement; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the staff be authorized to circulate the proposed ordinance and to schedule and conduct informal hearings on said ordiDance. DISTRICT 11 Certification of the General Manager received and ordered filed Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the certification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment, be received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 11 Approval of Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund check registers Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the District's Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund accounts payable check registers be approved for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay: Joint Operatlng Capital Outlay Revolving $ 71,583.59 1,438,986.62 $1,510,570.21 in accordance with the claims listed on pages "I-1" through "I-4", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -8- DISTRICT 11 #1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 3/26/75 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Adoption of annexation policy and fee schedule That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-49-11 establishing fees and procedures concerning annexations of territory to the District. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 11 Approving plans and specifications for Contract No. ll-4R Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-40-11, approving plans and specifications to Remodel Newland-Hamilton Pumping Station Facilities, Contract No. ll-4R, and authorizing advertising for bids. Certified copy of this resolution ~s attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 11 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:05 p.m., March 26, 1975. DISTRICT 5 Approving Joint Powers Waste Management Planning Agreement re San Diego Creek/Newport Bay Watershed Chairman Mcinnis and the General Manager reported on meetings in which they had participated with regard to development of a joint powers waste management planning agency, pursuant to Section 208 of the 1972 amendment to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act relative to the San D~ego Creek/Upper Newport Bay Watershed. Possible participants in the joint powers agreement would be District No. 5, Irvine Ranch Water District, the County of Orange, and the Orange County Water District. Following a general discussion concerning the proposed joint powers arrangement, during which the General Counsel commented on suggested changes to the draft agreement, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-51-5, approving and authorizing execution of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement creating Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency. -9- #1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 3/26/75 DISTRICT 5 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:13 p.m., March 26, 1975. -10- rds of Directors, ion Districts Nos. 1, 7, and 11 WARRANT NO. ,...J243 252lt4 25245 25246 25247 25248 25249 '25250 ·25251 -25252 ·25253 25254 25255 25256 25257 25258 25259 25260 25261 25262 25263 25264 25265 25266 25267 ·268 ~269 25270 25271 25272 25273 25274 25275 25276 25277 25278 : 25279 25280 : 25281 25282 25283 25284 25285 25286 25287 25288 25289 25290 25291 25292 :293 ~294 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Alex Fish Company, Ecological Research $ All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings, Couplings & Belts Alpine Aromatics, Inc., Odor Control Aljac Supply Co., Pipe Supplies American Backflow Co., Valve Parts American Soil Company, Lateral Repair Amoco Reinforced Plastics Co., Freight City of Anaheim, Power The Anchor Packing Co., Gaskets AMSA, Conference Registration Bancroft-Whitney Co., Government Codes Banning Battery Company, Batteries Barnes & Delaney, Conveyor Repair Bearing Specialty Company, Bearings Bell Pipe & Supply Company, Controls & Switches Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair Don Bogart, Employee Mileage Broadlicks Art Supply, Drafting Supplies CS Company, Valves & Freight Cal's Cameras, Photo Supplies & Processing Coast Insurance Agency, Insurance Premium Coast Towing, Towing Compressor Service, Compressor Parts Consolidated Electrical Distbrs., Electrical Supplies Constructor's Supply Co., Hardware Costa Mesa County Water District, Water Crest Leasing, Vehicle Lease Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplies Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies N. A. D'Arcy Company, Freight C. R. Davis Supply Co., Hardware Deaver Manufacturing Co., Equipment Repair John M. Deck Co., Equipment Parts De Guelle & Sons Glass Co., Glass Department of General Services, Technical Manuals Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling Dodge Truck, Inc., Truck Parts Ida L. Duesberg, Employee Mileage Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies & Printing Ecco Equipment Corp., Equipment Rental Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring Enterprise Printing Company, Cover Stock Fischer & P-:>rter Company, Pump Parts & Strip Charts William Fox, Employee Mileage GAF Corporation, Copier Repair Gasket Manufacturing Co., Inc., Gaskets General Electric Supply, Electric Supplies General Installation Co., Water Heater Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine Contract 1-1-75 General Telephone Company of Calif. Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage AMOUNT 159.00 It23.59 1,060.00 178.61 251.77 675.00 lltl.40 56.64 71.02 100.00 45.82 156.62 193.33 448.24 ?30. 44 38.00 21.00 17.74 531.35 315.98 . 59. 00 35.00 72.95 1,252.72 193.79 6.oo 147.28 80.00 25.38 529.05 6.06 81.41 95.40 63.44 181.99 12.72 428.25 82.19 7.80 135.12 820.00 3,000.00 69.91 2,438.58 23.70 214.67 158.18 533.30 64.91 6,326.30 3,111.77 33.90 AGENDA ITEM # 30 L-1 DISTRICT 11 WARRANT NO. 25295 25296 25297 25298 25299 25300 25301 25302 25303 25304 25305 25306 25307 25308 25309 25310 25311 25312 25313 25314 25315 25316 25317 25318 25319 25320 25321 25322 25323 25324 25325 25326 25327 25328 25329 25330 25331 25332 25333 25334 25335 25336 25337 25338 25339 25340 25341 25342 25343 25344 25345 25346 25347 25348 25349 IN FAVOR OF Graybar Electric Co., Electric Supplies $ Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Parts Hadley's Printing, Printing George T. Hall Co. , Pump Parts Halsted & Hoggan, Pump Harbor Fire Protections, Inc., Fire Extinguisher Service Harrington Industrial Plastics, Pipe Supplies Harrisons & Crosfield, Freight Hasty Lawn & Garden, Mower L. Heitman Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Rental Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires Honeywell, Inc., Strip Charts Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies, Tools & Hardware City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Equipment Rental Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware Irvine Ranch Water District, Water Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supplies King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, Bushings & Pipe Supplies Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware & Tools LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Hardware & Tools L & N Uniforms Supply Co., Uniform Service The La.cal Company, Inc., Pump Packing Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Equipment Parts R. H. Landin Graphics, Printing Jim Lankford Company, Adapter Larsen-Hog,ue, Equipment Testing Judy Lee, Employee Mileage McKesson Chemical Co., JPL Chemicals McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Hardware Majestic Fasteners Company, Hardware Marden Susco, Tools Meter Master, Inc., Equipment Repair Charles Meria.m Company, Metering Supplies E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers Morrison Company, Pipe Supplies J. Mosher, Employee Mileage N B Products, Pipe Supplies National Auto Glass, Truck Parts National Lumber Supply, Building Materials Newark Electronics, Tools City of Newport Beach, Water c. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel Fees Oakite Products, Inc., Cleaner Orange Coast Hardwood, Building Materials Orange Valve & Fitting Co., Hardware Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies Pacific Engineers, Piping Pacific Pipe Tool Co., Ladders Pacific Pumping Company, Pump Parts Pacific Telephone Company Parkwood Western Distribution, Hardware M. c. Patten Corporation, Controls AMOUNT 342.80 102.22 24.91 69.82'-' 725.49 103.71 374.29 42.18 45.50 594. 00 . 429 .08 . 118.95 . 40.19 526.29 14.40 407.87 35.99 . 1.75 729.57 1,085.66 884.56 434.50 130.32 1,574.60 1179 .17 1.34 301.04 23. 32 - 178.55--' 28.26 818.06 79.15 39.23 42.87 72.12 156.76 186.45 106.93 28.62 969.79 77.33 30.63 234.94 672.08 2,079.90 139.92 112.02 96.68 316.67· 834.60 706.07 79.23 344.48 63.o'"f'i-' 140.01 AGENDA ITEM # 30 L-2 DISTRICT 11 WARRANT NO. 25350 25351 "2~~§~ 25354 25355 25356 25357 25358 ., 25359 -25360 '25361 i 25362 25363 25364 25366 25367 25368 25369 25370 25371 25372 25373 25374 25375 25376 )377 ~378 25379 25380 25381 25382 25383 25384 25385 25386 253 87 < 25388 . 25389 ~ 25390 < 25391 253 92 25393 25~07 25395 2539 6 25397 25398 25399 25400 25401 140 2 :>403 25404 IN FAVOR OF Postmaster, Postage $ Preston Weed Control, Weed Killer Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal Terry Ramey, Employee Mileage The Register, Subscription Renewal Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Aluminum Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts & Freight Ruff's Saw Service, Saw Sharpening SGA Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Sargent Welc h Scientific Co., Testin g Supplies Saylor's Art & Engin e ering Supplies, Draft ing Supplies Science Applications, Inc., Hazardous Waste Study Scientific Products, Lab Supplies Service Motor Parts, Engine Repair Sherwin Electric Service, Equipment Testing Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies John Sigler, Employee Mileage Signal-Flash Company, Barricade Rental Fred Sinasek, Employee Mileag e Skil Corporation, Equipment Parts Smart & Final Iris Co., Supplies Southern California Edison Company South Orange Supply, Piping Supplies Southern California Gas Company South e rn California Water Company Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water Speed E Auto Parts, Tr uck Parts Standard Oil Company of Calif., Gas o line & Oil Sterling Art & Engineering Supply, Draf ting Supplies Sun Electric Co rporation, Equipment Repair Sunn en Products Co., Equipment Parts T & H Equipme nt Co., Inc ., Equipment Parts Bruc e Taylor, Employee Mileage Technical Book Company, Technical Manual s Thomas on Compressor Corp., Compresso r Repair Mar go Thomson, Employee Milea ge Tustin Water Works, Water Union Oil Company of Calif., Gasoline United Auto Parts, Truck Parts Unit ed Parce l Service, Freight-Out Un ited Reprographics , Inc., Printing Un ited States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts ·Utilities Supply Company, Too ls & Fire Extinguishers Patrick Vail, Employee Mileage Valvate Ass o ciates, Pump Parts Wall Street Journal, Subsc r ipt i o n Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage Arluss Walters, Emp loye e Mileag e John R. Waples, R. s ., Odor Consultant Waukesha En gin e Servicenter, En g ine Parts Whitney's Sp eedome ter Se rvice, Truck Repair World Travel Bureau, Inc., JPL Air Fare Xerox Co mputer Se rvices, Data Processing AMOUNT 500.00 353.78 62.00 59 .10 42.00 1,196.42 2,013.59 69.68 41.50 61.48 40.76 12.50 1,000.00 242.55 242.34 357.50 838.38 7.20 26.00 9.00 36 .17 23.09 1,137.04 64.94 1,701.89 3.00 100.05 451.70 8 ,504.90 26.08 -74. 79 134.63 11 8 .83 46 .62 26.66 70.00 7.50 35.16 107.42 299 .4 0 ll~. 52 66 .62 1,666 .71 558 .57 25.86 140.89 37.96 27.30 47 .10 220 .80 93 1.51 7.63 368.73 2,233.41 AG ENDA ITEM 1130 L-3 DIS TRI CT 11 WARRANT NO. 25405 25406 25224 25225 25226 25227 25228 25229 25230 25231 25232 25233 25234 25235 25236 25237 25238 252 39 25240 25 24 1 25242 IN FAVOR OF Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Service Zodiac Paper Company, Reproduction Supplies TOTAL JOINT OPERATING CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF All Bearing Service, Inc., Tools J o hn Caro llo En gineers, En gineering Services Clark Equipment Co., Fork lift, A-0 7 6 County Sanitation Dist. 2 of L.A., Solids Study Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16 E.T.I. & Ko rdick, Retention Contract I-8-3 Forkert Engineering, Survey Pl-16 Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Mgmt. Pl-16 Industrial Indemnity Co., Contractor P2-20 Motorola, Inc., Communication Equipment Perkin Elmer Corp., Freight Porter Bo iler Service, Inc., Contractor PW-035 Pyramid Fence Co., Contractor PW-039 Southern Calif .. Te sting Lab, Testing Pl-16 Spectra-Physics, Lab Equipment Tatkin Company , Metering Equipment T estin g Engineers, Inc., Testing Pl-16 J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Safety Equipment Twining Laboratories, Testing Pl-16 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF AGENDA ITEM #30 L-4 $ AMOUNT 1,320.55 85 .-?2 $ 71,583.59 '• $ 141. 90 -20' 134 . 13 . 9,450.96 25,000.00 1,234,869.80 79,613.73 1, 841. 50 11,397.00 8,956.52 1,579.40 30.52 33,815.70 3,076.35 196.20 5,459.00 382.66 1,59 9.0C ·763. 20 679.05 $1, l~ 38' 986. 62 $1,510,570.21 DI STRICT 11