Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-03-12l COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P~ 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) March 6, 1975 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 WEDNESDAY I. MARCH 12, 1975, 7: 30 p IM I 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA T. E L E PH 0 N ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. Other tentative meetings: Executive Committee (With Special Selection Co~nittee for Audit Services) Adjourned Regular Meeting of All Districts 6:00 p.m., Ma~ch 12, 1975 7 : 3 0 · p • m • , March 2 6 , 19 7 5 MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County~ California JOINT BOARDS Reg·u'l'ar· Mee·ting March 1 2 , 1975 -7:30 ~.~. Post Office Box 8 127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountqin Valley, Ca lif., 92708 Tele phones : Area Code 71 4 540-291 0 962-2411 The foll owing i s a brief explanat i on of the more imp ortant non-rout.ine items which. appear on the enclosed agend a and which are · not ot h erwise self-e x planatory . Warrant list s are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immedi ately preceding the meet i n g but wi l l appear in the com - plete agenda available at the meet i ng . Joint Boards No. 6 -Report of the General .Manager~ . . In June,.1 974, the Distr icts awarded thei'r largest contract ever , $29 .8 mi llion , to Donovan Construction Company for the construction of the 46 mgd ~cti~ated slud~e secondary treatment process at our Plant No . 1 . The Districts ' Chief Engineer will make a photo slide presentation of the progress to date on this project and the trunk ~ewers being constructed. in the Districts . No . 8 -Ve rb al Report of th e Executive Committee and Action s on the Committee's recommendations. The Ch airman of. the Speciai Se l ection Committee .for Audit Services, Robert Root , has asked that his committee meet · with the .Executive Committee to discuss their recommendations f or the empl6yment ~f an auditor . Chairman Winn has cilled a meeting for 6 :00 p .m., Wedn esday , Marc h 1 2 t h , preceding the r egul ar Joint Board meet ing . No. 10 -Consent Calendar . The f ollowing items fall into this category in accordance with the definition established by the Boards : Joint Boards No . '10-a -Comments re : Pre liminary Draft, Uniform Connecti o n and Use Ordinance . The Districts have received a letter from the Kerr Gl ass Manufacturing Corporation relative t o a p~eliminary draft of the Uni form Connection a nd Use Ordinance . It is r ecommended t hat their comments be referred to the' staff and General Counsel . No. 10-c -Licen&e Agreement to Occupy District Right of Way'. At the request of the owners of the Pantry Liquor, a business located · on Brookhurst south of Hamilton, the staff has prepared a License Agreement for the use of the Districts' right of way wh i ch is appro ximate l y 30 x 100 feet. The owners of the business e s t ablishment propose to use the surface of the right o f way for additional parking and have agreed to pay $50 for the preparation of the agreement plus $125 per year. It is a 5-year agr eement with an option .for an additional five years with biennial r e nt adjtistments tied to the cost-of-living ind e x. The agreement contains provisions that in t he event it is neces- sary .for our Districts t o make any repairs or excava t ion in the area, the pavement replacement will be done at the expense of the lessee. It is rec ommended that the agreeme nt b e app roved ·as it will reduce the Districts' maintenance expens e of the right of way. District No. 2 No. 10-e -Chang e Order No. 1 to Contract No. 2-18, Ca r b on Canyon I nter cep t or Sewer . Dur i n g th e c ourse of const r uc t ion o f Co ntract No . 2 -18 on Mill e r St reet, the contractor encountered unknown ut i l i t ies in the v i c inity o f t he Aut o n e tics fac ility ·between La Pa l ma and Mira Loma . Th is cau sed d ela y s and ex t ra work dur i ng the mont h of November . I t i s the s t a f f 's r ecommenda t ion that · a c h ange ord e r t ota l ing $9 ,955 .0 3 a n d a n extens i on of t i me of 6 cale n dar day s b e granted t he c o ntrac t or. No . 10-f -· Doc ument Ma p s for District No. 2 . We h ave r e qu est ed a proposal fr om Cliffo rd A. Fo rkert, a Civil Enginee r, t o update and ve r i f y our recor ds pe rt aini ng to righ ts of wa y a n d th e va l i d ity of our easement docume n ts r e l at i ve to all co n s t r u ct i on t h at h as o c c u rred wi t hin Di str i ct No. 2 . I n c l uded in the ag enda materia l is Mr . Fo r ke r t 's pro - p osa.1. I t i s t h e . staf f 's r e c omme n dat i on that Mr. F ork e r t be e ngaged o n a per diem bas i s in acco r dan ce wi th hi s sc h edu le o f cha r ges f or a n a mo u nt not t o e xce ed $7,000 . Di s trict No . 7 No. 10-i -Ann exa tio n No . 4 6 -·Tract s Nos . 8 799 and 8827. We hav e rec e ived a n a ppli6ation for a nriex atio n of 63 a cres in th e n orthea st corrie r of Oran ge Park Acres and Ch apma n -2 - ... Avenue adjacent to the Mead propert y from Residential Housing Systems, Inc. This property is current ly being annexed to the City of Orange and will receive sewer service through that city . The developers propose to construct 83 single fa~ily units o n the property which is within the population densities anticipated for the property in the District 's Master Plan. It is the staff's recommendation that the resolution appearing in the agenda material initiating proceedings for the annexation be approved . No. 10-j -Approval of Plans and Specifications for Cbntrac t No. 7-6-7, Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer . The Districts' eng ineers have comp l eted the construction plans ·and specifications for the second segment of the Tustin- Orange Trunk Sewer. ·This facility will be constructed in the Sout hern Pacific Railway right of way from Irvine and Newport to Fa irhaven Avenue. The staff is in the process of acquiring right of way easements from the Railway Company . The design engin eer has estimated there will be a substantial savings and less inconvenience to the motoring pub lic during the const~uction period by aligning the sewer in this right of · way iDstead of an· alignment in pub lic streets (Ho l t and Esplanade). However , the District will have to acquire 2 .4 acres of permanent right of way. The .same right of .way is proposed to be acquired by the Count y Harbors , Beaches and Parks Department for mu lti-purposes·, such as bicycle trails,, etc. The 21"-24" VCP sewer will extend 9200 feet in length. The engineer's estimate of the construction co st is $480,425. District No . 11 No. 10-1 -Plans and Specifications for Remodeling of the Newland-Hamilt on Pump Station, Contract No. l .l-4 R . For several year s , we have budgeted f unds f or the re- modeling· of this pump station to make its appearance more com~ patible with the surrounding residential · area . The p ropos ed imp rovements have been approved by the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Bu ilding Department. The contract to be let will improve the adjacent Southern Counties Gas Company facilities as we ll as our own . The total cost o f . the contract will not exceed $20 ,000, with the Southern Counties Gas Company's share at $4 ,000. It is the staff 's recommendation that the project be adver tised for bidding purposes . All Districts No. 1 2 -Dr aft Dated March, 1975 , Revised Uniform Connection and Use Ordina n ce . Pursu ant to the Boards' inst ructions on February 19th, the enc l osed draft ordinance incorporates recorrµnend at ions of -3- the General Counsel regarding the enforcement provisions and other matters relative to procedures established by the ordinance. The purpose of the ordinance is to establish source-control limitations and provide for an equitable dis- tribution of the Districts' costs based on quality and .quant i ty paramet ers. We are proposing a series of publ ic meetings in accordance with the following schedule: · Date ·Thursday, 3/20/75 Monday, 3/24/75 Tuesday, 3/25/75 Wednesday, 3/26/75 Thursday, 3/27/75 Thursday , 3/27/75 Monday, 3/31/75 Monday, 3/31/75 Tuesday, 4/1/75 Wednesday, 4/2/75 District No. 2 Time 1: 30 p .. m. 1:30 p .. m. 1:30 p.m. 1:30 p.m. 1:30 p.m. 7:30 p.m. 1:30 p.m. 7:30 p.m. 1:30 p.m. 1:30 p.m. Organization Chambers of Comme rce Conservation Groups Public Agencies Class I Users Class II Users General Public Class I Users General Pub lic Manufacturing Assns. General Public No. 38 -Public Hearing re: Annexation No . 8 . ·On February 19th, the Board esiablished 8:30 p .m., March 12th, as the time of a public he~ring for the annexation of an inhabited tract which was annexed to the City of Orange several ·years ago but not to Sanitation District No. 2. The tract is now occupied and annexation to the District must be conducted as an inhabited annexation. On February 20th, material was mailed to all District No . 2 Dtrectors concerning procedures for annexation of this City of Orange tract. No. 39 -St~ff Report re: Reach 3, Santa Ana River Interceptor f rom .Grove Street in Anaheim to the County Boundary. In October, during discussions relative to the siz ing of the Santa Ana River Interceptor for·Reqch 3 through the Santa Ana Canyon, the staff was directed by the Board to contact those agencies concerned with sewer services in that area. Inc luded with the agenda for the District No. 2 Directors is a re- port on the staff's activities to date. Fred A. Har.per Gener a l Manager _ ... ~ ..... -4-.. F:L: ·'"··············· II. BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Count y S11 nit11ti o n D istricts of Orange Coun ty, Ca l ifo rn ia JOINT ·BOARDS MEETIN G DATE MARCH 12, 1975 -7 :30 P .M.· (1 ) Pledge of All egiance and I n vocat i on (2) Ro ll Ca ll -~~ 'w-~\\ (3) Appqintment of Chair men pro tern, i f neces s ary f'l\\S ._ C3a) Post Off ice Bo x 8 1 27 10844 Ell is Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 T e le phooes: Am Code 71" 5.(0 -2910 9 62-2.( 11 AGENDA ADJOURt•MENTS POSTED .~ COMP & Mll.EAGE ... k-:'.': ... FILES SET. UP ....... / ...... :. RESOLUTI ONS crnTI FIED.t/ . L[TIEi:S \'lfllTTE N ..... '. ........ . MINUTES WRITIEN ..... v.:".'.' •• MINU TES ~ILED .... : ... J....<.: ••• LETTER ·······-····· ln:MS ON SUPPLEMEN TAL AGENDA 'IC .•.. TKtR •... Consider ation of motion to r e ceiv e a nd file minu t e ex ce~pt fr om t he City of F ountain Va lley regardi ng election of may o r and appointmen t o f a l t~rn a t es to serve on the Districts ' Board s as fo l low~: (*Mayor ) "-'.-................... .. FILE ........•...•••••• LETTER ···-······- A/C ····!KLR -- LETTE R ............. , A/C •••• TKLR •••• ·----·······---··· ... (4) ® @]) @ ~ Di strict 2 3 EACH DIS TRIC T Active George B. S.c ott Bernie Svalstad* , Al tern ate Bernie S valst a d * Rogert Stan t o n Conside ration of mo tions approvi n g mi nut es of t he follo wing mee tings , as ma iled : Di strict 1 Febru ary 19, 197 5 r e g u lar District 2 Februa r y 19 , 1 975 re gu lar Di strict 3 February 19, 1 9 75 r egul a r ' Di strict 5 February 1 9 , 1 975 regular Di s tri ct 6 Februa ry 19 ' 1975 reg ular District 7 February 19, 1 ~75 regul ar 'J!i s tri.Q_t /.I.~ Feb-ruar_y 19-s--1 9 75 regulqry ALL DI STRICT S Rep o r t o f the Joint Ch a irman . A Li DISTRICTS Report o f t he General Ma nage r ALL DI STRICTS Report of t he Gener a l Counsel ALL DIST RICTS Verbal r e port of the Ex e cutive Co mm i t tee .. ' (9) FILE .••••...........•• •· LETIER ............ .. A/C .••• TKLR .••• .1)..... Q~~ -····-••••••O•••HO••O (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of re comm~~dat ion of Special Sele~on Committee for Audi V Servi res r e engagemen\; of · a_ udit ~ to conduct the 1J t 4-75 fisc a l" year audit: (a) Report of;t~e Special Selection Commit ee for Audit Services ( ) Cons i ~~ation of motio . to receiv , file and · '\ acce ~t proposal of ~...,.......----'...,,_~~.,,,..._-·......,,.-=-=,..,,-~~..,,..;.,..~~ ""-.t~ovide audit s ervices't-'0-l?-""the 197 -75 fiscal year,for an amount not to exceed$~~.,..--~~~ ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed upon the consent calendar .are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested t o-be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff me mber, or member of the pub lic in attendance, there wil l be no separate discussi on of these items . All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving al l moti ons, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All i tems removed from the consent cal endar shall be considered in the regular order of business . Members of the public ·who wish t o remove an item from the consent calendar shall , upon recognition b y the chair, state their name, address and desi gnate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar . * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any i tems are to be del~ted from the cons ent calendar . C. ~ e Consideration of action ~o approv~ all agenda items appear ing Roll Call Vote Qr Cast unanimous Ballot on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same . FI LE LETIER ······-·-- A/C ••.• TKLR •••• FILE -·····-··-·-G'--~ A/C .... TKLR •••• ALL DI3'f'RIC~ ,, ";>.., ~.s , w ~'1 _ (a) Consideration of motion to receive ~nd file commen t s of Kerr Glass Manufacturing Co rporation , dated F ebruary 1 3, 19 75, in connect i o n with the Districts ' tentative draft of revised Uniform Connection and Use Ordinance and refer to staff and General Counsel (b) Consideration of motion to receive , file and r eject amended claim of Kelly Timothy Kel~as f iled by Charl e s A . Price, Attorney for Claimant, for alleged damage or ·injury incurred in an accident involving a District-· owned vehicle, as recommended by the General Counse l Consideration of Resolution No . 75 -37, approvi ng License to Occupy Right of Way with .Jack R. Fenton and Wayne R. Peterson, A Pa rtnership, and authorizing District No. 1 to execute said li cense, in form .approved -by General Counsel: See page "A" (d) Consideration pf motion to receive and file staff progress report on Treatment P l ant Construction Projects. See page "B" (CONS E NT CALENDAR continued on page 3) -2 - (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) FILE .••...•....••••••• LEITER ·······-···- A/C •..• TK LR •••• DISTRICT 2 ~ Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1, to the plans and specifications for Carbon Canyon · .Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-18, authorizing an addition of $9,955.03 for extra work due to undisclosed utilities and granting an extension of time of 6 calendar days for completion of said work, to the contract with ~--r.(j·:··· / < r) LEITE R::\~ ••.. ¥ S. S. Zarubica. See page "C" Considera~ion of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of Clifford A. Forkert, Civil Engineer, dated March ~. 1975, for pr~paration of right of way document maps and records, on a per diem fee basis, for a maximum amount not to exceed $7,00Q.OO FllE A/C ..•. TK LR ••.• FI LE ·······-·····- LEITER ············- A/C .... TKLR •••• LEITER ··········- ~ _:;~A.~-. .----:- ~ -~~S,0/" FI LE ············~--·· LEITER ···-·····-~~ µ,-{<.J /C •... TKLR ·- :g._~e ~--. ... ~: .... - IL..<.'. ......... .. LEIT ER ............ .. A/C .... TKLR .... ---···---- (11) (g) See page "D" Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress reports on construction of th·e Yorba Linda Pump Station, . Contract No. 2-15; the Carbon Canyon -Palm Drive Inter- ceptor-Sewer, Reach 2, from Carbon Canyon Channel to Kraemer Boulevard, Contract No. 2-17-2; and. the Carbon Canyon Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-18. See pages "E" "F" , and "G" DISTRICT 3 (h) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress reports on construction of the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18; the Imperial Relief Interceptor, Reaches 22 & 23, Contract No. 3-19; and the Knott Inter- c~ptor, Reaches 5 & 6, Contract No. 3-20-1. See page~ "H" "I" , and "J" DISTRICT 7 (i) Consideration of Standard Resoltition No. 75-38-7, authorizing initiation of p~oceedings to annex approxi- mately 62.64 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the northeast corner of Orange Park Acres and Chapman Avenue (Proposed Annexation No. 46 Tracts Nos. 8799 and 8827 •to County Sanitation District No. 7) (j ) Consideration of Standard Resoluti on No. 75-39-7, approving plans and specifications for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 11 and a Portion of Reach 12; Contract No . 7-6-7, and authorizing .advertising for ' ·bids . Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress report on construction of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 10, Contract No. 7-6-.6. See page "K" DISTRICT 11 (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-40-11, approving plans and specifications to Remodel Newland- Hamil ton Pumping Station Facilities, Contract No. ll-4R, and authorizing advertising for bids ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any ALL DISTRIC'rs Considera tion of motion to receive, file and take under advise- ment tentative draft of revised Uniform Connection and Use Ordinance, dated March, 1975, and authorizing the staff to circulate the proposed ordinance and schedule informal hearings (Copy enclosed) -3- .. • FIL E '. ..•....•......••• LETTER ·······-··-· A/C .•.• TKLR -·· -··-·-~··· .... ·-········- FILE (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideratio n o.f motion t o re ce ive and file certification ·of the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recoinmends authorization f or payment ( 14.) ALL DISTRICTS (14) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint 110tt CALL VOTE .• -· Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund accounts payab l e check registers for signature of the Chairman su,,,_,:J:~TsA~~GENDA of District No. 1, and authorizing payment of claims e listed on page "I" ALL DISTRICTS Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, · (15 ) Consideration of motio·n authorizing the Districts' staff to proceed with any additional process development work on the JPL activated carbon process in an amount not to exceed $100 , 000, pursuant to the conditions· of t he State and Federal Step 1 Grant authorization to proceed with mMSON SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA the construction and operation of a 1 MGD reactivated carbon wastewater treatment process facility. (In July, 1974, the Boards declared their intent to match funds with the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the National Aeronautics Space·Administration in an amount not to exceed $100,000 for additional process development.) LETTER ·····-····-· A /C •.•. Tl<LR •••• DISTRICTS 2 ,3 ,7 & 11 Considerat ion of a nnexation policy and fee schedule. (See enclosure) ~ 15 ~1~ -Z..1 15-'/3 -3 .... TS -</./-17 (17) QI8~~IQ~g 1 & 7 · 9omlide1 atiem Of me1;1el"l f!:fjfH'e vi;l'lg B'l:lBf!!!l"IB!! f1:tl"1El: l1'f!:l"!'f!:l"11;!!, if f!:l"IY• See B'l:lf3f3lel!lel"l'al ageHae a'1;aefimel"l~ (18) BIS'i'RIS'P 1 (19) (20) (21) Eiel"l!!ieie?"a1;iel'l ef llletiel"l a1313l"e'lil"lg HS!l"l!'&l"l+iB j if al"ly. See Bttf!f!lemel"l1;e:l e:geHae e:1;te:efime!'l1; DISTRICT 1 Oth_::yln:ls :rn;ss ~~omniunicatio_ns~·e rne nt al agenda ;t-e ms, if any ~ ; DI STRIC T 1 S: 3 o Con s ideration of moti o n to adjourn to ·'(-:-3-0-p.m., Wedn esday, March 26, 1 975 ~ · . .s S DIB'i'RIO'PS J & 11 9eueie!er a'bien ef Pne'Eien a~131 e u iug; ett!9J!>@li2'C :@and ;;a11 ants , if &RY eee ett1313le!l!eH1;i;tl &gel"lda e:+i+ie:eh"1e11t N\ \ '::>( 2.2) DISTRIC T 3 (22) Consideration of motion approving warrants . ntMSON SUPPLE MENTAL AGENDA See .page "II" (23) :P IS TRICT 3 · · . \Oth er )1:1-S~R.~m:Cithir,1s-..Q..:c-s1J.pp leriie ntal t-t ,ems , if a ny agen da ( 24) DISTRICT 3 S ;-3,o Consideration of mo tion to adj o urn to ~D ~.m., Wednesda y, March 26, 1 9 75 g : S-(o (f5) DIS'PRIO'Ps s & e Ge~aiael!'&tie l"l ef ffiOtioR a~~PoviRg sws~@Rse fwRd waPPaRt~, See e 'l:lf'l'leme n1;al e:t;euaa e:eeaefimene (26) DIS'PR IO 'P 5 ( 27) (2 8) GeueieieI e:'eien ef me'6ieA B:f!l~Fe; itt~ \:!:r 1 e.!1181!, if e:P!y. See Bttp15lcmental egeride: aet.achmeut D~STRICT ~ . · . o her bus l-n.e~-eommui11c-a.t.!Qn§_or--sa pp I em!ffita l agenda i terns, if a nY-. DISTR IC T 5 .5: ~o Consideration of motion to a djourn to ~p.m., We dnesday, March 26 , 19 7 5 v • o .S {p -4- ~ • • • t""' E.29) (30) (31) DIS':PHIGtE' e GeHeideratioR ef met1QR apppg\•1Rg HQPP&Rt&, if 8:PIY. See ~ttr>r>lemental a~eHeia aeeaehmeut DISTRICT 6 s-·· ~u Consideration of motion to adjourn to -1+3Q-p.m., Wednesday, March 26, 1975 ~~ 5 '1 .~/_s (32) DISTRICT 7 {32) Co n side ration of motion appro ving warrants. ITTMS ON s II TII" SUPPlEMEt{TAL AGENDA ee pag e -------=--- { 33) · DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (34) .DISTRICT 7 S'-Z:.O Consideration of motion to adjourn to~p.m., Wednesday, March . 26, 1 97 5 ~·-S1 (35) DIS~HIG~ 11 Co11side1 atio11 of 111otion appr o u ing 11&11 a111'e, if an:y . Bee Bl:tf'f'lemel"l1;e:l a~el'lee: aM;aeh1nel'li:i \_{36) ~TR ~ -----------· ~h'erbUsinesS'an~rcatio.ns ol:-.s.u.pp.lem~genda · items, if any . . .( 37) DISTRICT,,.....l~ . . ~ Consideration f motion 0-adJOUr~n~ay, .__.,r.arch 26, 1975 mE .................. 0 DISTRICT 2 (A) Public hearing (to begin at 8:30 p.m .) re ,proposed . Annexat ion No. 8 -Tract No. 4980 to Coun~y Sanitation District No. 2: 6 LEITER ............ .. .. A/C .... TK LR .... -~ ~ Open hearing . ~ Sununary of Lo9al Agency Formation ·commission's . and District No . 2's action re proposed anne xati on {3) Written protests and withdrawals of same, if any (4) Oral ·protests, if any · FILE ................. . (5) Determination ot sufficiency o~ pr otests , if ~ny (6) Close hearing -§!'R '?.4~ __ ._.,-'II A/C .... TKLR •••• (B) Conside ration of Resolution No. 75-.!fiis-2, ordering ....................... _Roll Cell Vote or Cast Unan imous Ballot annexation of approximately 7,979 acres to the District in the vicinity of Ma llard Stree t and Collins Avenue (Proposed Annexation No . 8 -·Tract No. 4980 to Co unty Sanitation District No. 2) fc;;)l DISTRICT 2 ~ Staff r eport re Sant a Ana River Interceptor from La Palma Avenue to Orange Co unty Line, Contract No. 2-14-3. (See enclos·ure) ~1/$(40) DISTRICT 2 ITEMS ON ( 4 O ) SUl'PLEMEN TA L AGENDA Cons ide rati on o f motion approv ing wa rrants. See page "I I" ( 1) DISTBI~ . ~ ot·h e r bu s in e-~d comm unications or supplemental agenda items, if any (42) DISTRICT 2 ..6''.30 Considerati on of motion to adjourn to ~-p.m., Wednesday, March 26, 1975 Cf·. D'1 -5- ---i RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS March 12, 1975 -7:30 p.m. '· RESOLUTION NO. 75-37. AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF LICENSE TO OCCUPY RIGHT OF WAY WITH JACK R. FENTON AND WAYNE R. PETERSON, A PARTNERSHIP A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF · COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF LICENSE TO OCCUPY RIGHT OF WAY WITH JACK R. FENTON AND WAYNE R. PETERSON, A PARTNERSHIP . * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boardsof Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, Californi~, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain License to Occupy Right of Way, dated · , is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That County Sanitation District No. 1, as agent for itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, is hereby authorized and directed· to enter int~ said agreement granting Jack R. Fenton and Wayne R. Peterson, a Partnership, right of way in the vicinity of Brookhurst Street, Hamilton Avenue and the Santa Ana River, for cqnstruct~on and mainten- ance of an asphalt parking lot 30.6 feet wide and 101.0 feet long; and, Section 3. That· payment of an initial lump-sum fee in the amo.unt of $50.00 plus $100 per annum payable yearly in ·advance for use of said.right of way, is hereby authorized; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said License to Occupy Right of Way, ·in form approved by the Districts' General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 12, 1975. AGENDA ITEM #lO(c) -A-ALL DISTRICTS PROGRESS REPORT TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS P2-20 -POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT PLANT NO. 2 -($158,294) Districts taking over job at Contractor's request. CO.UNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALI FOHN IA P. 0. BOX 8127 108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9;>/0A (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 Lighting fixtures installed. Transformer set in place. Two of ·the three motor control centers are installed. Contract approximately 95 percent complete to date. Pl-16 -46 MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT AT 'RECLM-1ATION PLANT NO. 1 -($ 29, 876, 000) Major foundation work completed. Structural work continues in all areas. Aeration basin walk 70 percent complete. Placement of aerator top deck ~o begin this month. Blower building basement slab completed with walls and lower deck presently under way. Machinery dimension problems caused some delay in this area. Secondary clarifier slab on grade work continues and is estimated to be completed this month. Digester No. 9 -lower walls po,ured. No. 10 -lower walls to follow·. Basement level and tunnels of digester control building in place. Garfield Avenue block wall and Ward Street improvements complete. PW-035 -ADDITIONAL BOILER FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2 -($39,047) Boiler in place. Work certified complete. PW-039 -CHAI.N LINK SECURITY FENCE AT EAST ENTRANCE, RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 - ($3,418.17) All work essentially complete. AGENDA ITEM #lO(d) B-1 ALL DISTlUCTS :'-" Progress Report Treatment Plant Projects Page Two TREATMENI' PLANT WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During February DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During February Total· Work Under Design Total Work Out to Bid COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 $30,0-76,760 9,926,818 1,278,970 $21,222,237 9,571,030 528,220 ·10,568,340 ·S51, 257 (714) 962-2411 $30,076,760 $21,222,237 10 ,568' 340 551,257 TOTAL AMOUNI' 0NDER CONTRACT, DESIGN, AWAITING AWARD AND OUT TO BID $62,418,594 March 6, ·1975 AGENDA ITEM #lO(d) B-2 ALL DISTRICTS cou:~TY S.:\:H TA Tl o:.; J) I !;r1: J CTS or-cw,\: :GE cou::TY P. o. Box 8127 -lOo-14 Elli:; AVC'llUC Fountain Valley, California ~2708 CllA~GE OIU>ER C.O. NO.-1 co•nr~C.TOR: _...;.s;;..;•;...._s~. _ZAR_UB_ICA ___________ _ DATE ---=-~~b-r~ch~6-,~1~9~7~5-----~ JOB: CARBON CANYON INfERCEF'I'OR SEVER,. LA PALMA AVBruE TO CRClffiIER AVENUE, COITTRACT NO. 2-18 Amount of this ·change Order (ADD) (l'H:iMtH~T) $ 9,955.03 In accordance with contract provisions, the following·changcs in the contract an<l/or contract work arc hereby a1:1thorizcc.l anc.l as cor:1pcnsation therefor, the following. additions to or deductions from tl1c contract price arc hereby approvc<l. Reference: Inspection reports of November 6, 7, 13, 14, 18 & 19, 1974 and Contractor's invoice dated January 20, 1975. ADD: For delays and extra work on the . above dates caused.by unknown utilities Extension of Time The contractor is hereby granted a time extension for the above extra work of TOTAL TIME EXTENSION Summary of Contract Time Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Ext~nsion·This Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time · Revised Completion Date TOTAL ADD 9,~55.03 9,955.03 6 Calendar Days 6 Calendar Days .June 27, 1974 240 Calendar Davs February 22, 1975 6 Calendar ,Days a.Calendar Days 246 Calendar Days. February 28, 1975 Original Contract Price $ 1,472,160.42 Prcv. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (ADD) cmmm~1) $ . 9,955.03 Amended Contract Price $ 1,482,115.45 .Hoard authorization date: March iz, 1975 Approved: COUNTY SANITATIO~J DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By------------~----~--.,..~...-~ Consulting Engineer By--------~----------~~~-:.-::-= AGENDA ITEM #lO(e) Contractor -C- By --------------------~------------Chief Engineer DISTRICT 2 CLIFFORD A. FORKERT CIVIL ENGINEER 22311 BROOKHURST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92646 (714) 963-6793 March 4,· 1975 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Reference: Proposed preparation of Document Maps for District No. 2 Attention: Mr. Ray Lewis Dear Sir: The following is a general outline of our proposed procedure whfch we have developed after conversations with you and · Mr. Herbert Kyzer of your organization. 1. 2. 3. AGENDA ITEM #lO(f) An index. to the maps will be prepared showing the entire 7 districts and will be based on Zone VI of the Lambert projection system as derived frcm the Standard Wall Maps of Orange County. The maps will be prepared on linen.or mylar, depending on your preference, however it should be noted that linen is becoming increasingly difficult to acquire and since most public agencies have come to accept mylar for mapping it maybe more feasible to accept the mylar for this purpose. We intenc to make the maps on 28 inch x 41 inch material of your choice, this will allow a one inch boi::der on three sides and ample room on the bottom for any Title Block which you may desire. The actual mapping grid will be 25 inches or 15,000 feet and 38.33 inches or 23,000 feet. It would be preferable to orient North to the left on the map, since the great majority of your trunks arc in a North-South direction. This would greatly reduce the number of maps required. The above figures are based on a scale of 1 inch equals 600 feet, which would greatly facilitate the preparation of the maps, since most of the line work can be traced directly from the Orange County Wall Maps. D-1 DISTRICT 2 • .. ·CLIFFORD A. FOR KE RT CIVIL ENGINEER 22311 BROOKHURST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92646 (714) 963-6793 4. We would search the records of Orange County for the pertinent documents; however we would require the year in which you interid to begin. According to our conversation with the Recorder's Office the documents are listed by the Grantee for each year, due to this systeffi it may be preferable to search the.entire 7 districts ~tone time. It is our understanding that we will acquire the recording references only and that your organization will actually order the documents since there would not be a charge to you. 5. We would index each document and prepare a master listing, in addition we would prepare a card file listing each document by number, Granter, recording ·reference, date and other pertinent data. A dupli~ate would be made of each card and filed on another system of your choice. It should be noted most Counties are going to an Instrument No. and date for all future recordings and this may be your preference for the duplicate filing card. In reference to Item 4 if all documents are acquired at one time the indexing could. be completed prior to mapping the other districts. . 6. Each document would then be plotted on the map ·and the document reference number shown. 7. The documents wo9ld be then filed in folders of perhaps 50 to 75 documents depending on the length of the·documents. 8. Since the County Wall Maps do not show lots, it would be helpful in plotting the documents if assessor's maps were available, perhaps these are in your old work order files. We believe the above procedures would make all easements readily available, and the ·system would be as simple as possible to follow for even your newest personnel and the maps of this size when reduced to half size would make a completely legible office work sheets. · We understand that this contract would be on a cost of materials and labor basis per the inclosed rate sheet. AGENDA ITEM #lO(f) D-2 DISTRICT 2 CLIFFORD A. FORKERT CIVIL ENGINEER 22311 BROOKHURST . HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92646 (714) 963-6793 The estimated cost of this project is not to exceed Seven Thousand dollars ($7,000.00) f~r District 2, however due to the unknown number of documents involved, researching all documents at one time and preparing only one index map, this figure could not be considered as concrete until·further information is available. We appreciate the opportunity to submit .this proposal. We hope that we can be of service to you on this project. Cordially, ~~ Forkert, civil engineer • ,, AGENDA ITEM #lO(f). D-3 .DISTRICT 2 ... . ·' ·. Clifford A. Forkert Civil Engineer 22311 Brookhurst St. Huntington Beach, CA (714) %3-6793 Suite I ll2t.>4u ITEM I -FIELD: ST ANDA RD RATE'S SCHEDULE OF CHARGES CIVIL ENGINEERING & SURVEYING Effective August 1, iq74 (1) 40 hours per week, 8 hours per day, operating from Headquarters: a. Field Inspector . 'Plus mileage. b. Furnishing Field Supervisor c. Furnishing Two Ma~ Survey Party d. Furnishing Three Man Survey Party . e. Furnishing Four Man Survey Party . Travel time after 8-hour work day is to be charged at the above rates -e.g. straight time. (2) Atn'HORIZED OVERTIME: ·a. ·time worke<l in exces~ of 8 hours per day, (excluding travel time) and for work per- formed on Saturday (maximum 11 hours), multiply above rates by 1.3. b. For work performed on Sunday (maximum 11 hours), multiply above rates by l. u. (3) PER DIEM: a. When job location requires men to work away from Headquarters -Board and Room furnished: fdd $13.00 per day, ~er man. RATE HOUR DAY. . $18.45 $147.60 • $20.75 $166.00 • $41. 25 $330.00 • $60.00 $480.00 .. $74.00 $592.00 (4) SPECIAL SURVEYING EQUIPMENT -Addition to crew rates: 1. 2. AGENDA ITEM #lO(f) Electronic Measuring Equipment -Long Range: Electronic Measuring Equipme11t -Short Range: D-4 Plua $11.00hr. Plus $3:00 hr. DISTRICT 2 ---------------------· -· . . ' Clifford· A. Forkert Civil Engineer 22311 Brookhurst St. Suite I Huntington Beach, CA 92646 (71'•) 963-6793 SCHEDt.n.E OF CHARGES {STANDARD2 ITEM II -OFFICE TIME: (1) a. Drafting b. Calculating c. Design • -Au~ust lz 1974 RATE HOUR ·DAY • $17.50 • $18.00 . $19.50 d. Supervisor .. $20.00 (2) e. Legal Description Writing f. Title Examination g. Lookup and Delivery h. Document Typing i. Professional Consultation At.TrHORIZED OVERTIME: a. Time worked in excess of 8 hours per day and for work performed' on Saturday (maximum . . ·11 hours), multiply above rates by 1.3. b. · For work performed on Sunday (maximum 11 hours), multiply above rates by 1.6. ,, . . (3) PER DIEM: a. When joQ location requir.es men to work away from Headquarters -Board and Room furnished Add $15.00 per day, per man. ITEM III PROFESSIONAL SERVICES a. Registered Civil Engineer Plus mileage from Headquarters. b. Registered Civil Engineer - 8 hours per day basis, away from Headquarters, Board and Room required AGENDA ITEM #lO(f)· D-5 • $20.00 • $20.00 $ 8.50 $ 8.50 $29.00 . $24.00 • $212.00 DISTRICT 2 .. . . Clifford A. forkert Civil En~ineer SCHEDULE OF CHARGES (STANDARD) -August 1. 1974 ITEM III -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (cont'd): ITEM IV c. Registered Civil Engineer - Consulting COMPtrrER TIME: a. I.B.M. Computer b. Keypunch Operator GENERAL CONDITIONS: 22311 nrookhurst St. Huntin~ton R~ach, CA (714) %3-b793 RATE HOUR DAY $29.00 $40.00 $ 8.20 Suite 92u4b (1) Headquarters, as referred to herein, is our Huntington Beach office. (2) The 8'.chedule of charges for surve/ parties, as shown above under Item 11) c, d and e, includes transpo~tation, (4-wheel drive excluded), within a radius of 25 miles of Headquarters; survey instruments; equipment and insurance as required to perform various types of land surveying, excepting jobs requiring special fnstruments and equipment, or of an unusual natures, such as: a. b. Triangulation surveys requiring first and second order work. Surveys requiring electronic distance:measuring equipment. . . " c. Precise level surveys • d. Hydrographic surveys requiring off-shore equipment. e. Work in remote areas not practically_ accessible by automobile transportation or where the· establishment of a camp site is required. (3) Jobs that require survey parties of two or more men where the job location is· beyond a radius of 25 miles from Headquarter~, a charge of $0.15 per mile will be made for each mile over 50 miles of travel each day, unless otheNise noted. . . ·--·----·--·-·--· AGENDA ITEM #lO(f) D-6 DISTRICT 2 ' • ·-··-·----··-·--- Clifford A. Forkert Civil Engineer 22311 Brookhurst St. Huntington Beach, CA (714) %3-6793 SCHEDULE OF CHARGES (STANDARD) -August 1, 1974 GENERAL CONDITIONS (cont'd): (3) (Cont'd) Jobs requiring one man operation, such as Chief of Parties, Field Inspectors, Field Supervisors or Registered Civil EnKineers, where the job location requires the employee to work from a field office or field Head- quarters,. and transportation is required, a~harge of $0.15 per mile or a minimum of $12.00 per day for each vehicle will be made. (4) When 4-wheel drive equipment (jeep) is required, a ·charge of $14.00 per day will be made for each vehicle. (5) Material to be charged at cost, plus 20%. ·.• Suite I 9264& AGENDA ITEM #lO(f) D-7 DISTRICT 2 M E M 0 R A N D U M COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of.ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71<4) 540-2910 (71<4) 962-2411 March 6, 1975 TO: FROM: Fred A. Harper, General Manager Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer SUBJECT: Yorba Linda Pump Station, Contract No. 2-15 Installation of ·steel has been completed. placed for the floor .of the pump station. for pump station walls are under way. REL:BEW:TR:ss AGENDA ITEM #lO(g) -E- Concrete has been Erection of forms DISTRICT 2 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: M E M 0 R A N D U M March 6", 197 5 Fred A. Harper, General Manager Ray E. L~wis, Chief Engineer . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS c,, ORANGE couNrv. CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2-411 Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer, Reach 2, Carbon Canyon Channel to Kraemer Boulevard, Contract No. 2-17-2 1,500' of VCP has been installed on Palm Drive. The contractor estimates completing 100' per day. Backfill operations are in progress. Paving will follow later this month. Construction is moving well and should remain on schedule. REL:BEW:TR:ss AGENDA ITEM #lO(g) F-1 DISTRICT 2 tj H C/l t-3 ::::0 H 0 t-3 f\) .· ~ C'cm; !el,:· :e •• •• lo be Cons (ll"uci~d ( > '°41...Alt .q ~ . . {' ar bdl'? {;;/1!:f0/'J -/J /n'1 Or1°ye /rJ /ercc;>lor S'cvf//?r' t<>l"ich 2 . . ('r.Jr,/,.t:tc/ ih, Z-17-2 ( a: Q % '° ::,, 0 ~ 0 IX) )( 0 ~ ~ Q ~ -~ ~ ..J ~ ct' Q tu lJ ~ .... "'> -"> MO~SE AV 1 mi le ".,C 39" pi;oe Ctt11lrt?cl t7wL7rdcd: tJ~c: I / 1 74 Cos I: .1' 53~ 4t:,2 I I , I 5credvled' ..;;,. t'om_pll':t1,1n. '-'1,v 2~1 75 .( MEMORANDUM March 6, 1.975 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager. FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 1084" ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71 ") 5"0-2910 (71 "l 962-2" 11 SUBJECT: Carbon Canyon Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-18 . Installation of RCP on Miller and Crowther has been completed. All backfill and paving has been installed. Approximately 2,000' of RCP has been installed on La Palms. Backfill operations are in progress. The contractor estimates completing pipe installation by the last of March. Grove Street has been paved and is considered completed. La Palma from Grove Street to Miller has been closed to through traffic. Local traffic is allowed to flow up to Grove Street and Fountain Way. All efforts have been made to . . alleviate hampering business ~raffic. REL:BEW:TR:ss AGENDA ITEM #lO(g) G-1 DISTRICT 2 :i> 0 trl z t:1 :t> H i-3 trl ~ ~ ~ 0 ,,...... ....__, 0 I I\.) ti H Cll 8 ::D H (') 8 I\.) ( . COMPLETE ••••••• TO gE CONSTRUCTED CARBON CANYON INTERCEPTOR SEWER LA PALMA AVENUE TO CROWTHER AVENUE CONTRACT NO. 2-18 ( 1. 3 MI LES OF 66 11 & 39" Pl PE CONTRACT AWARDED JUNE 27, 1974 COST: $1,472,160 SCHEDULED roR COMPLETION FEBRUARY, 197 ( MEMORANDUM March 6, 1975 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager· FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer SUBJECT: Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18 .COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS o~ ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 IOU-4 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71-4) 5-40-2910 (71-4) 962-2-411 Installation of RCP for the siphon at Edwards Street will begin upon opening of one lane of north hound traffic on Goldenwest. Paving has been installed on Goldenwest from Main Street to the jacking pit at Westminster Avenue. Boring operations are in progress. Tunnel operations have progressed 80'. 70' of liner plate has been installed. Tunnel ·operations have been hampered du~ to numerous broken sewers. The Contractor estimates completing tunnel heading north by the end of this we~k. Pipe installation is scheduled to begin by the middle of March. South bound traffic on Goldenwest is limited to one lane. East bound traffic on Westminster Avenue is limited to one lane. Welding of the PVC liner plate in the installed pipe is completed. REL:BEW:TR:ss AGENDA ITEM #lO(h) H-1 DISTRICT 3 ·~~ .] 'lS N0.11M J 0 ~ >-~ 'l.SN~~~I'-z t-'l~ ~NOW_] til ZlLZ L '.:)Qd 'JS ~ng N~~=i. ~ z O· ~ IL J ~ 0 () 'l.S NO;~=i c __, ~ c_ 3 'J,S c;J-4\fCl\I -=. ;1 ~ f2 ~ n.. lU g u ~ \.) l-~ z ~ t- 'lS N~0109 t-\jl ...-\LJZ ~ .-() IL(J Y. OL ~ -c0 <() ~ I 3,0 ~ ~ I • t> • <( • ~ • t-• z 0 u AGENDA ITEM #lO(h) H-2 "DISTRICT 3 MEMORANDUM March 6, 1975 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 SUBJECT: Imperial Relief Interceptor, Reaches 22 & 23, Contract No. 3-19 550 L.F. of VCP remains to be installed. All other VCP has been installed. Dewatering operations are in progress east of Harbor. Paving installation has been completed. The siphon under the Orange Co~nty Flood Control box is complete. Installation of VCP pipe under Harbor Boulevard will begin after approval from the Department of Transportation. The. contractor estimates completing all work by the middle of April. The contractor has and is presently handling construction operations in an extremely professional manner which h~s been a great asset to the 'District. As per State standards, east bound traffic is limited to one lane from -7 A.M. to 2 P • .M. After 2 P.M. east bound traffic is returned to two lanes of traffic. REL:BEW:TR:ss AGENDA ITEM #lO(h) I-1 DISTRICT 3 )> 0 l:zj z 0 )> H 8 l:zj 3 =;t:: I-' 0 !:J' H I I\.) 0 H Ul 8 :::0 H (') 8 lJJ _J\LAHASRA ll.BLvo1t II fl lltAHASRA llsLvo II t;fl Q ~ .J :r tJ c:c llJ co LAMBE.RT -zttBEGIN // , PROJECT COMPLETE t- 41) 0 :r <( 0 ••••••• TO BE CONSTRUCTED ( ... "' ..;. IMPERIAL SANOELWOOD AV~ 7r IMPERIAL RELIEF INTERCEPTOR REACHES 22 & 23 CONTRACT NO. 3-19 ( 1- 4,/) ~ND L ~ROJECT uJ 1- 2 uJ ~ a. 1.lf MILES OF 2lf 11 , 21", & 18 11 PIPE CONTRACT AWARDED: OCTOBER 7, 1974 COST: $778,372 SCHEDULED FOR COMPLETION APRIL, 1975 ( M E M 0 R A N D U M March 6, 1975 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2-411 SUBJECT: Knott Interceptor, Reaches S and 6, Contract No. 3-20-1 Dewatering operations ·are in progress in the middle of Goldenwest. Bypass laterals are being installed.. A start pit on Golcenwest just north of Westminster Avenue has been excavated and shored. The shield has been set in the trench. An 8" VCP bypass sewer on Goldenwest has been installed. Installation of RCP is scheduled to begin the middle of March. Traffic is hampered on Goldenwest· from Westminster Avenue to Garden Grove Boulevard due to construction and storage of materials; All efforts have been made to alleviate traffic problems REL:BEW:TR:ss AGENDA ITEM #lO(h) J-1 DISTRICT 3 0 :J' r y I I\) t:1 H C/.l t-3 ::0 H () t-3 w -t GOLOEN WE'ST )> ~ o:> fTl -t (/) -t )> 111 r- \I) x ~ .. Comp le le •I I e I e 8 J; /;11 Con:rlr-t.1cktl ( CD ,- < 0 !<'no-I-I ln-lerceplor Reaches 5 t f, r- )> > "O (/) 0 z )> , < Conl~acl A/4 3-2()-f ( ', "" WESTERN ------------ u-a -4 (\ 0 x: X> ~ > 'Q ~ )> n z. ::c )> z z Pl r ~ RR ( TO: FROM: M E M 0 R A N D U M March 6, 1975 Ered A. Harper, General Manager Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 108-44 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (71-4) 962-2411 SUBJECT: Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 10, Contract No. 7-6-6 The contractor began working in the intersection of Red Hill and Mitchell on February 25, 1975. Installation of the temporary bypass system was completed on March 3, !975, diverting the flow out of the Contract No. 7-2, 21" VCP into the Contract No. 7-2R, 36" sewer. Traffic is restricted to one lane each way at the intersection. A temporary chain link fence is installed around the excavation during non working hours. REL:BEW:TR:ss ' . AGENDA ITEM #lO(k) K-1 DISTRICT 7 .l> ·< . f2l ·Z : c: . fTl RED H l LL. AVENUE ( ---Con?j'le.fe eee.e•• lb '7e conslrv~fed (./) CJ> ~ 2 X> < '-)> c z )> z ... • Tusfin -OrctnC/e TYvnk: Se::'wer .,,. K)each 10 Con .f ra .c .f J../t:J, '/ ... ~ -.~ ( (J') -j "}) Ill fT• -; '75 ( II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California DISTRICTS 2 & 3 JOINT BOARDS SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS MARCH 12, 1975 -7:30 P.M. Post Off ice Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714' 54'0-2910 962-24' 11 AGENDA (3a) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from the City of Fountain Valley regarding election of mayor and appointment of alternates to serve on th~ Districts' Boards as follows: (*Mayor) District 2 3 ALL DISTRI.CTS Active George B. Scott Bernie Svalstad* Alternate Bernie Svalstad* Rogert Stanton · (14) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving J o int Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund ·accounts payable check registers . for signature of the Chairma n of District No. 1, and authorizing payment of claims listed on I?age · "I" (15) Consideration of motion authorizing the Districts' staff to proceed with any additional process development work on ' the JPL activated carbon process in an amo unt not to exceed $100,000, pursuant · to the conditions of the State and Federal Step 1 G~ant authorization to proceed with the construction and operation of a 1 MGD reactivated carbon wastewat er treatment process facility. (In July, 1974, the ~cards declared their intent to match funds with the Jet· Propulsion Laboratory and the Na tional· Aeronautics Space Administration in an amount not to exceed $100 ,000 for additional process development .) DISTRICT 3 (22) Consideration of motion approving warrants . See page "II" DISTRICT 7 (32) Consideration of motion approving warrants. See I?age "III"· DISTRICT 2 (40) Consideration of motion appr.oving warrants. See page "II" -2- WARRANT NO. -243 ~244 25245 25246 25247 25248 25249 25250 25251 25252 25253 25254 25255 ·~ . 25256 25257 25258 25259 25260 25261 25262 25263 25264 25265 25266 25267 -268 ~269 25270 25271 25272 25273 ·25274 25275 ·25276 25277 25278 25279 .25280 25281 25282· 25283 25284 25285 25286 25287 25288 25289 25290 25291 25292 -293 ~294 .JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Alex Fi'sh Company, Ec9logical Research $ All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings, Couplings & Belts Alpine Aromatics,. Inc., Odor Control Aljac Supply Co., Pipe Supplies American ~ckflow Co., Valve Parts American Soil Company, Lateral Repair Amoco Reinforced Plastics Co.,.Freight City of Anaheim, Power The Anchor Packing Co., Gaskets .AMSA, Conference Registration Bancroft-Whitney Co., Government Codes Banning Battery Company, Batteries Barnes & Delaney, Conveyor Repair Bearing Specialty Company, Bearings Bell Pipe & Supply Company, Controls & Switches Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair Don Bogart, Employee Mileage Broadlicks Art Supply, Drafting Supplies CS Company, Valves & Freight Cal's Cameras, Photo Supplies & Processing Coast Insurance Agency, Insurance Premium .. Coast Towing, Towing Compressor Service, Compressor Parts Consolidated Electrical Distbrs., Electrical ·supplies Constructor's Supply Co., Hardware . Costa Mesa County Water District, Water Crest Leasing, Vehicle Lease . Culligan Deionized Water Service, !4b Supplies Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., ·Lab Supplies N. A. D'Arcy Company, Freight C. R. Davis Supply Co., Hardware Deaver Manufacturing Co., Equipment Repair John M. Deck Co., Equipment Parts · De Guelle & Sons Glass Co., Glass Department of General Services, Technical Manuals Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling Dodge Truck, Inc., Truck Parts Ida L. Duesberg, Employee Mileage Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies & Pr~nting Ecco Equipment Corp., Equipment Rental· Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring Enterprise Printing Company, Cover Stock Fischer & Porter Company, Pump Parts & Strip Charts William Fox, Employee Mileage GAF Corporation, Copier Repair Gasket Manufacturing Co., Inc., Gaskets General Electric Supply, Electric Supplies General Installation Co., Water Heater Georgia.Pacific Corp., Chlorine Contract 1-1-75 General Telephone Company of Calif. Cindy Gete·r, Employee Mileage I-1 AMOUNT 159.00 423.59 1,060.00 178.61 251.77 675.00 141.40 56.64 71.02 100.00 45.82 156.62 ·193.33 448.24 230.44 38.00 21.00 17.74 531.35 315.98 59.00 35.00 72.95 1,252.72 193.79 6.oo 147.28 80.00- 25.38 .529.05 6.06 81.41 95.40 63.44 181.99 12.72 ·428.25 82.19 7.80 135.12 820~00 3,000.00 . 69.91 2,438.58 23.70 214.67 158.18 533.30 64.91 6,326.30 3,111.77 33.90 WARRANT NO. 25295 25296 25297 25298 25299 25300 25301 25302 25303 25304 25305 25306 25307 25308 25309 -. I 25310 25311 . 25312 25313 25314 25315 25316 25317 25318 25319 25320 25321 25322 25323 25324 25325 25326 25327 25328 25329 .25330 25331 25332 25333 25334 ·25335 25336. 25337 25338 25339 25340 25341 25342 253113 25344 25345 25346 ·25347 25348 25349 IN FAVOR OF . . Graybar Electric Co., Electric Supplies $ Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Parts Hadley's ~rinting, Printing · George T. Hall Co., Pump Parts Halsted & Hoggan, Pump Harbor Fire Protections, Inc., Fire Extinguisher Service Harrington Industrial Plastics, Pipe Supplies Harrisons & Crosfield, Freight Hasty Lawn & Ga.rden, ·Mower L. Heitman Equipment Co., Inc.; Equipment Rental Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires ·Honeywell, Inc., Strip Charts Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies, Tools & Hardware City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Bea.en Equipment Rental, Equipment Rental Inland Nut & Bolt·Company, Hardware Irvine Ranch Water District, Water Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supplies King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, Bushings & Pipe Supplies Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware & Tools LBWS, Inc., -Welding Supplies, Hardware & Tools L & N Uniforms Supply Co., Uniform.Service· The La.cal Company, Inc., Pump Packing Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Equipment Parts·· R. H. Landin Graphics, Printing Jim Lankford Company, Adapter Larsen-Hogue, Equipment Testing Judy Lee, Employee Mileage McKesson Chemical Co., JPL Chemical~ McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Hardware Majestic Fasteners Company, Hardware Marden Susco, Tools Meter Master, Inc., Equipment Repair Charles Meriam Company, Metering Supplies E. B. Moritz Foundry., Manhole Rings & Covers Morrison Company, Pipe Supplies J. Mosher, Employee Mileage N B Products, .Pipe Supplies National Auto Glass, Truck Parts National Lumber Supply, Building Materials Newark Electronics, Tools City of Newport Beach, Water c. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel Fees Oakite Products, Inc., Cleaner Orange Coast Hardwood, Building Materials Orange Valve & Fitting Co., Hardware Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies Pacific Engineers, Piping Pacific Pipe Tool Co., Ladders Pacific Pumping Company, Pump Parts Pacific Telephone Company Parkwood Western Distribution, Hardware M. C. Patten Corporation, Controls · I-2 AMOUNT 342.80 102.22 24.9~ 69.8~- 725.49 103.71 37It.29 42.18 45.50 594.oo 429.08 118.95 40.19 526. 29 . 14.40 407.87 35.99 1.75 729.57 1,085.66 884.56 434.50 130.32 1,574.60 479.17 1.34 301.04 .23.3r 178. 5.9-" 28.26 818.06 79.15 39.23 42.87 72.12 156.76 186.45 106.93 28.62 "969. 79 77.33 30.63 234.·94 672.08 2,079.90 . 139-92 112.02 96.68 316.67 834.60 706.07 79.23 344.4~ 63.0,- 140.01 WARRANT NO. 25350 25351 >352 ~353 25354 25355 25356 25357 25358 25359 25360 25361 25362 25363 25364 25366 -25367 25368 25369 25370 25371 25372 25373 25374 25375 25376 >377 ~378 25379 25380 25381 25382 ·25383 25384 ·25385 25386' 25387 25388 25389 25390 25391 25392 25393 25~07 25395 25396 25397 25398 25399 25400 25401 )402 ~403 25404 IN FAVOR OF Postmaster, Postage Preston We~d Control, Weed Killer Rainbow· Disposal Company, Trash Disposal Terry Ramey," Employee Mileage . $ The Register, Subscription Renewal Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Aluminum Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts & Freight Ruff's Saw Service, Saw Sharpening SGA Scientific, Inc.; Lab Supplies Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Testing Supplies Saylor's Art & Engineering Supplies, Drafting Supplies Science Applications, Inc., Hazardous Waste Study Scientific Products, Lab Supplies Service Motor Parts, Engine Repair. Sherwin Electric Service, Equipment Testing Sherwin Williams'co., Paint Supplies John Sigler, Employee Mileage Signal-Flash Company, Barricade Rental Fred Sinasek, Employee Mileage Skil Corporation, Equipment Parts Smart & Final Iris Co., Supplies Southern California Edison Company South Orange Supply, Piping Supplies Southern California Gas Company Southern California Water Company Sparkletts Drinking Water c·orp., Bo-ctled Water Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts . Standard Oil Company of Calif.~ Gasoline & Oil Sterling Art & Engineering Supply, ~rafting Supplies Sun Electric Corporation, Equipment Repair Sunnen Products Co., Equipment Parts T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Parts Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage Technical Book Company, Technic~l Manuals Thomason Compressor ·Corp., Compressor Repair Margo Thomson, Employee Mileage Tustin Water Works, Water Union Oil Company of Calif., Gasoline United Auto Parts, Truck Parts United Parcel Service, Freight-Out United Reprographics, Inc., Printing . United States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts Utilities Supply Company, Tools & Fire Extinguishers Patrick Vail, Employee Mileage Valvate Associates, Pump Parts Wall Street Journal, Subscription Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage John R. Waples, R. s., Odor Consultant Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine ~arts Whitney's Speedometer Service, Truck Repair World Travel Bureau, Inc., JPL Air Far~ Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing I-3 AMOUNT 500.00 353.78 62.00 59.10 42.00 1,196.42 2,013.59 . 69.68 41.50 61.48 40.76 12.50 1,000.00 242.55 .242. 34 357.50 838.38 7.20 26.00 9.00 36.17 23.09 1,137.04 64.94 .1,701.89 3.00 100.05 451.70 8,504.90- 26.08 . 74. 79 134.63 118.83 46.62 26.66 70.00 7.50 35.16 107.42 299.40 14.52 66;62 1,666.71 558.57 25.86 140.89 37.96 27.30 47.10 220.80 931.51 7.63 368.73 2,233.41 WARRANT NO. 25405 25406 25224 25225 25226 25227 25228 25229 25230. 25231 25232 25233 ,_. 25234 25235 25236 25237 25238 25239 25240 25241 25242 IN FAVOR OF Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Service Zodiac Paper Company, Reproduction Supplies TOTAL JOINT OPERATING CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING Fmm WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF All Bearing Service, Inc., .Tools John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services Clar~ Equipment Co., Forklift, A-076 County Sanitation Dist. 2 of L.A., Solids Study Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16 · E.T.I. & Kordick, Retention Contract I-8-3 Forkert Engineering, Survey Pl-1.6 Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Mgmt. Pl-16 Industrial Indemnity Co., Contractor P2-20 Motorola, Inc., Communication Equipment Perkin Elmer Corp., Freight Porter Boiler Service, Inc., Contractor PW-035 Pyramid Fence Co., Contractor PW-039 · Southern Calif. Testing Lab, Testing Pl-16 Spectra-Physics, Lab Equipment Tatkin Company, Mete~ing Equipment Testing Engineers, Inc., Testing Pl-16 J. G. Tucker & Son, .Inc., Safety Equipment Twining Laboratories, Testing Pl-16 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF I-4 $ $ $ AMOUNT 1,320.55 85.52 ~ 71, 583_. 59 141. 90 20,134.13 9,450.96 25,000.00 1,234,869.80 79,613.73 1,841.50 11,397.00 8,956.52 1,579.40 30.52 33,815.70 3;076.35 196.20 5,459~00 382.66 1:,599.0~ 763.2~ 679.05 ·$1,438, 986. 62 $1,510,570.21 DISTRICT NO. 2 Vb.rlRANT NO. ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 25207 25208 25209 25210 25211 25212 25213 25214 25·215 25216 2r"l7 ~ 25218 25219 25407A 25220 Cou~ty of Orange, Compaction Testing 2-lt-2 & 2-18 Mark Dakovich, Inc., Contractor 2-17-2 J. Putnam Henck, Contractor 2-15 Kasler Corporation & L.H. Woods & Sons, Contractor 2-14~2 Lowry a.nd Associates, Engineering Services 2-14-2 2-14-3 6 8 '. ' 2-1 -1, 2-17-2, & 2-1 SAWPA, Grant Payment 2-14-2 S. S. Zarubica, Contractor 2-18. DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 3~18, 3-20-1, 3-21-1, & 3-21-2 County. of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-18 & 3-19 · Mike Prlich & Sons, Contractor 3-19 South.ern California Testing Laboratory, Soils Testing 3-19 Sully-Miller Contracting.Company, Contractor 3-20-1 A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Saliba, Contractor 3-18 A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Sa:liba, Contractor 3-18 City of Westminster, Facility Relocation 3-18 II AMOUNT $ 266.10 "140' 797. 80 28,389.48 178,021.00 28,602.55 83,800.00 256,573.63 $ 716,450.56 10,494.50 340.08 52,748.oo 261.72 30,240.00 198,930.50 32,000.00 7,250.00 $ 332,264.80 WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 25221 Don Koll Company, Refund Invoice Overpayment FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 25222 Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 7:...6-7 25223 McGuire Construction, Inc., Contractor 7-6-6 III $ AMOLv 37.11 $ 37-:Ll $ 2,256.00 3,375.00 $ 5,631.00 ~ -Age~~a I.tern No. 3 ~ S T A . F F R E P 0 R T March 5, 1975 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS . of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVE NU E FOUNTAIN VALLEY , CALIFORNIA 9 2 708 (714) 5-40-2910 (714) 962-241 I THE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR, REACHES III AND IV -CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3 Pursuant to the instructions of the Board of Directors ·of County Sanitation District No. 2, the staff did contact the affected cities and county agencies regarding the design and alignment of that portion of the Santa Ana River Interceptor from the intersection of La Palma and Grove Streets to the Orange County boundary, to serve the upper basin area as well as those portions within Orange County either presently within or outside of the ~anitation District's boundaries. The staff did present before the Ci~y Councils of Yorba Linda and Placentia, as well as meet with the staff of the Orange County Planning Department and appea~ before the Planning Commission, to present the concept as indicated in the Project Report for this project. As a result of the interfacing between the Sanitation District's staff and those affected agencies, the following is a summary of the results and actions of said respective affected agencies: 1. A report was presented to the City of Anaheim and on November .26, 1974, the City Council did adopt Resolution No. 74-R-598, .which stipulated that the proposed Santa Ana Regional Interceptor may interfere with the air quality" standards, but found it was necessary to solve the critical water quality problem. Attached is a copy of said. resolution (Exhibit A)". 2. On October 15, 1974, the general manager and chief engineer appeared before a special study session of the City Council of the City of Yorba Linda wherein the design concepts of the interceptor were presented . As of this.date, the Sanitation District has not received any formal action taken by the City of Yorba Linda regarding this matter. 3. Staff reports and the consulting engineer's preliminary design report were submitted to the Yorba Linda County Water District one of the sewering agencies in the drainage area, which they have reviewed and concur with the design triteria ai established in the staff report on Sept.ember 26th (Exhibit B). ·4. On November 6, 1974, the chief engineer and consulting engineer appeared before the City Council bf the City of Pl.acentia at a special study session preceding their regular Council meeting, wherein the design concepts were presented. On February 18, 1975, the city engineer presented a staff report to the City Council which recommended the capacities and the design criteria as established,which recommendation was sustained by the City Council.· (Exhibit C). 5. On November 4, 1974, the general manager and chief engineer appeared before the Planning Commission of the County of Orange wherein the design concepts, as well as the alignments and impacts associated with this project were presented to the ·commission. In subsequent meetings with the staff of the Planning Department, the Planning Commission has recommended the adoption of a resolution of the Board of Supervisors to be considered at their regu~ar Board Meeting of March 11th. A copy of Mr. Osborne's letter to the Board of Supervisors is attached herewith (Exhibit D) 6. On March ' 3rd, the Distr.ict received a -de.Clara ti on from Mr.· ·Paul DeFalco ;· Regional Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, which stated that an Environmental Impact Statement, sometimes required by the Environmental Protection Agency for funded projects, is not required. (Exhibit E) 7. The District's consulting engineer and chief engineer have met with the two major private property owners and have discussed the align- ment of the interceptor through their property. Both property owners have reviewed the proposed alignments and do concur with those alignments presently.developed. (Exhibits F, G and H). The staff and consulting engineer are in agreement that the design criteria as established and set forth in the memorandum of September 19, 1974 regarding the capacities and the design criteria for this project, should be considered and · acted upon by the Board as soon as possible. The staff is desirous of presenting to the State and Environmental Protection Agency the project plans, ·specifications and accompanying design criteria on or before· April 1st of this year, in order that approvals can be obtained before tJ;i.~. end of this fiscal year (June 30, 1975). The recommendatlons as cont~ine'd in .said staff report of September 19, 1974 have been reviewed in great detail and it is the opinion of the undersigned that they should be approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of District No. 2. Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority did, on March 5, 1975, receive a letter from the State Water Resources Control Board giving concept approval of the project from La Palma and Grove Streets through the County boundary and through Prado Dam to the northerly terminus of Projects 4B and 4C, which concept approval was predicated upon the Project Report submitted March 1, 1974. REL:hje CITY OF ANAllEl\t, CALIFORNIA Office 0£ City Clerk December 27, 1974 "":.. Fred A. Harper, G·eneral Manager County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr.· Harper:':• .. . FILED In tne Office of the S c cr<?ta'ry Coun"'ty Sanitation District No ··-- JAM 8 1975 Forwarded for your records is a certified copy of Reso- lution No. 74R-587, duly passed and adopted by the Anaheim City Council at their regular meeting held November 26, 1974, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING THAT THE PRpPOSED SANTA .ANA.REGIONAL INTERCEPTOR MAY INTERFERE WITH AIR QUALITY STAND ARDS, BUT IS NECES- SARY. TO SOLVE A CRITICAL WATER QUAL.ITY PROBLEM AND RECOG- NIZING THAT LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION RESTRICTIONS MAY BE NECESSARY TO MEET AIR QUALITY s1ANDARDS. st Enclosure cc: Public Works Director City Engineer Very .truly yours, CITY OF ANAHEIM -. ·0:.:..--, ..... "-~.??. ,)_~....,_,, ;-:~·:.,..0 ALONA Me HOUGARD, CITY CLERK P. 0. Box 3222, Anaheim, California 92803 EXHIBIT A -Page 1 of 3 a . __i RESOLUTION NO. 74R-SB7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED SANTA AHA REGIONAL INTERCEPTOR MAY INTERFLRE WITH 1-.IR QUALITY STANDARDS, BUT IS NECESSARY TO SOLVE A CRITICAL WATER QUALITY PROOLEl1 AHD JIBCOGlH Z- ING THAT LAND USE 1\ND TR.l\NSPORTATIOU RESTnIC- TIONS MAY BE NECESSARY TO MEET AIR QUALITY STANDARDS. WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, in cooperation with the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, is constructing the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor7 and · WiIEREhS, it is the intent of this Interceptor ·to prevent a degrading of the groundwater supply of Orange County1 and WHEREAS, it is necessary as a result of the construc- tion of this Interceptor for the City Council of the City of Ana~eim to make a finding that this project may interfere witP. the att~inment or maintenance of air quality standards, but . the project is needed to solve a cri.tical water g m1li ty probler.!7 and the City Conncil does recogniz·e that land use and transport<·- tion restrictions may have to be ir.1plementec1 to meet air quality standards1 and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of lrnaheirn find ~: it in the best interests of the City to make said finding • .. .,NQF, TH~REFOIU:, BE IT RES~LVEf? by the City Cow1cil of : . ,:·t~e ::c.tty;. 'o~: .i\naheim that the City Council recognizes that th~ (~ ~; ,<constrUctio:i::of the Santa Jl..na Regional Interceptor may interfe::rc· l'-~.. with the at'tttinrnent and maintenance . of air quality s tandnrcis, ·· b~t ~he ·p:r:oject is neE:ded, to sol vo n critical water qunli t:.' problem, -and that 1f t is recognized that lnnd u:::c and tr;:mr;µcrt;~~· tion restrictiqns may have to be implemented to meet 01ir auc.li t-, ... ,~tandards. ·: · -- THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is a9proved and si~n~d by :r:·;:.: this 26th day of November, 197.\.. ATTES'l': l ( r ... crN CLERK oFTHE ~ITY or Am1.HEIH EXHIBIT A -Page 2 of 3 FAL1 jh .. .... '; STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEill ) I, ALONA M. HOU GARD, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 74 R-587 w~s passed and adopted at a regular me e ting of the City Council held on the 26th day of ilov e lilber, 1974 1 by the following vote of the members thereof ; AYES; COUNCIL ~ERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Tho m NOES; COUNCIL MEMBERS : ifane ABSENT: . COUNCIL ME?-IB ERS: Uone · Ju~D I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim approved and signed said Re solution No. 74R-5 5 7 on t he 26th day of t;ovember-. 1974. IN WITNESS WHERE OF, I have hereunto set QY hand and affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 26 t h day of November, 1974. CITY CLERK OF THE CirY OF ANAHEill (SEAL) .... .' I • ITT~Yt/~~@<;;i;.~i v. .. , 'lJ ... ff·•~-,,·~:.:::. '.:.r~~:\:~== ."" , -~;: .\,; .. :;;: .:··. ~~_.=~ .... · .. .; ·,.; THE FO RE GOING INSTRUMENT IS A FULL TRU E AN D ~~:l ~~~:T~~:;:.~~~~--;i~ l~;~s ALONA M. HOUGARD, CITY CLEllX OF THE C'T Y •. :·. ,: ::.:;.;:; A o JS; :/ ' I_ ' ' • .~ "'' BY c{;a:...cR.._~-------•···~ ..................... .. Ofi..:•J ·. :: t.::..:" . EXHIBIT A -Pa g e 3 of 3 YORBA LINDA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AREA° COD E 714 PHONE 52ll 722& '41>22 PLUMOSA DRIVE MAIL.ING ADDRESS DRAWER F YORBA LINDA, CALIFORNIA 9266 G . September 18, 1914 OFFICERS R. 0. HASTINGS PACSIOt:NT RALPH C. S HOOK GENERAL MA N A G£R FRED CLODT VIC£ PRES I O E NT JEAN E . MATHEW S 5ECRl:T ARY GORDON PETER SON AUD_ITOH Orange County Sanitation District No. 2 P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Ca l ifo rnia 9270 8 DIRECTORS R . D. H A S T IN GS M E RWIN WAG N F.H FRED CLOQT M . R OY K NA UFT . .J R H O W A R D LIN DOW .Attention: Mr . Fre d A. Harp er, G.ene.ral Ma nag er Re: Capa~ity of Sant a An a Riv e r Int e rc e ptor Gentlemen: T~e Board of Directors of the Yorba Linda County Water District has reviewe d the O.C.S.D. No . 2 ·staff _ report dated Sept'ember 2 6, 1 9 7 4 . The Board re-c o mmends t h at you adopt the d esig n c rite ria at the 0.6 5 depth capacity with th e 3 9 11 -5 1" l i ne s i ze s as outlin ed i n the repor t .· This lin e i s b a dly need e d n ot only . to prov i de r e l i ef . o f exi s ting p ro bl ems b u t a s a t ool t o i mprov e the poor water qua l ity of the upp er por t i on ·of th~ l ower San ta Ana Riv e r Gr o u n d Wat er Basin . T h e Yo r ba Linda County Water Di strict would apprec i ate whatever ·you can do to exped i te t h e comp l etion of t hi s ve r y importa n t l ine . RC S: jm Ve ry truly yours , Ra l p h C. S h oo k Ge n era l Ma n ager ·- by -'. J ean E. Mathew s S ecr e tary EXHIBIT B TIN hop~ Are The City Mey or Councll~n ROBERT B. LYONS City Administrator EDWIN T. POWELL MICHAEL J . CALLAHAN L. JACK GOMEZ ROBERT P. LANGER GEORGE ·F. DeJESUS 401 East Chapman Avenue -Placentia, California 92670 ·Mr. Ray Lewis Chief Engineer February 24, 1975 Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF CAPACITY AND DESIGN CONCEPT REACH III -SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER Dear Ray: Pursuant to the request via Don Martinson of .Lowry & Associates the City Council acted.February -18, 1975, to approve in concept the E-0 Projection of Population Growth for sewer .....,, capacity requirements .and the proposed sewer design criteria as advanced in your memo to Fred Harper dated September 19, 1974. It was our staff opinion, concurred by the City Council, that the criteria for sewer capacity and sewer design as proposed by the District is realistic and in con.formance with good practice. truly,· ' 7~-_.~~ Ben Minamide, P. E. City Engineer BM/cs cc:· Director , Community Development Engineering Division EXHIBIT C -Page 1 of 10 -. M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE: FEBRUARY 11 , 1975 SUBJECT: SANTA /\NA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER -REQUEST BY ORANGE COU NTY SANITATION DISTRICT TO APPROVE CAPACITY AND DESI GN CONCEPT FOR: CITY COUNCIL MEETING -FEBRUARY 18, 1975 ENGINEER'S REPORT NO. 75-23 ABSTRACT: The Orange County Sanitation District is preparing to embark on the Phase II I reach of the subject sewer which will provi_de sewer capacity for a.) the S anta Ana Canyon area in Orange County and b .) the Upper Wate rsh ed , in Riverside and San· Bern."'lrdino Counties·. They requ es t the City Council 's approval of 1.) concept determining s e wer capacity requirements and 2.) sewer d e sign c rite ria. DISCUSSION: Because of upper watershed d e velopment in Rivers ide and San Bernardino Counties and resultant urbanization, wastewater has been discharged into .the Santa Ana River o r permitted· to percolate into groundwater basin s unde rlying the valle y lands . As a result Qf possible damage to the area 's water resources through highly mineralized wa stes , a joint powers planning agency wa s fo rmed ~mong: San Be rnardino Valley Minicipal Water Djstrict. Western Municipa l Water Di stri.ct . Chino Basin Mu nicipal Wa ter Di strict . Orange County Water District. The joint powers agency is called the Santa,Ana Watershe d Planning Agency . One of the highe s t priority projects for this Planning Agen cy was for the e xport of hig hly mineralized water produced· in the Upper Watershe d to the ocean by pipeline via the existing and propose d facilities of the Co unty San itation Districts of Orange County . l\t the same t ime, it wa s fe lt that the most cost P.ffect ive <1pp roach to s ewering the Santa Ana Ca nyo n a r ea of Orange County would be for the Sanitation Di s trict to provide ove r sizing to the same line . ·P RO.JE<;:T CAPACITY: I n .1 detailed project report to the Santa Ana Wat erGh ed Authority dated F e brua ry , 1974, Lowry & Associates point out that the capacity to be provided f or the Santa Ana Canyo n Orange Cou nty area ct•uld vary widely . dcpr:nding on the amount of urban growth that i ~ p r ojected. Six _al t nrnati ve population projections were studied . Configuration A -This projection ass\l!l\e S Santa Ana Ca nyon would develop in accordance wi t h existing general plans and land use pol icies now practiced by the affected Cities and the County. Configuration B -This projection was based on twice the density of Configuration A. FEB 1 1 1975 . '~~ND~ ITEM No;,_-4-t::::.:r=·== EXHIBIT C -Page 2 of 10 l Engineer 's RepoI lo. 75-23 Febr ~a ry 1 1, 1975 Santa Ana River Interc eptor Sewer-Re quest by Orange Co u n ty Sanitatio n District to .O.pprove ·Capacity and Des ign Concept Configuration C -Thi s projection was based on one-hal f (~) the d e nsi ty of Configuration B. Configuration D -Thi s p r oj e cti on u s es the same development d e n si ty a s A, but at an accel a ted rate . Configura tio n E -This assumes all land p r esent l y classi fied as "open spac e -con se rvatio n " in ex i sting l and use plans wou ld rema i n in t hat catagor y and no t undergo a ~y future urban d e vel o pment . E-0 Proj e ction -This projec tion i s based on a l o w fe r t i l i ty r a t e that woul d r e pro duce e xisting population l e ve ls and no in-mi gr ati on t o the State of Cal ifornia. However , the p r ojection does provide for ant icipated sh ifts o f pop u lation within the State. The pro j ections are mad e by app l y ing growth rate factors t o the 1970 census d ata . Cl e an ;o;ate r Gr ant Progr am s r equire u se of t his proj e ction f or g r ant applic a t ions . The Sanitatio n District feels that t he E-0 Pro jection is t h e most v i a ble altern ative a nd i t will r esult in substantially the same s i ze p r oject as Configuration E . OF.S IGN CRITERI A: Pipe flow and s izing must be based on sound e ng ineering p r acti c e . The standard d esign c r i t e ria o f t h e County Sanitatio n Dist r ict a re: P i pe Roug hness Co effic i e nt Design De pth of F low F l o w Ra te· Velocity Manhole S pac ing Mannings " n=O .13 0 .6 t o 0 .7 Dia meter 100 ga]-/c apita _per cl a y . p l u s Comme r c ial /I nd ustrial f l ow ·2.0 ft/sec . min." 1000 ft. max i mum Of mos t c oncern i s the c ri teria of de s lgn fo r dept h of flow in a pipe . By d es i g ning for a pipe r u nn ing say O. 6 (or 6 0'lfl; of pipe diamete r you would n a t u ral ly have l ess c apacity than in d esigning fo r a g i v en p i pe running f ul l. Ge n e r a l practi c e is to desi g n pip e s t wenty-four inches ( :!4 " l o r l ess t o run ha lf f u ll a nd larger pipes t o r un a maximum of 0 .7 (or 70%) o f pipe d i a meter. It i s staffs fee ling t hat no sewer should be de s i g ned to run full . A ma rgi n f or peak f l ows and oxygen aeration wi t h in the pipe shou ld b e prov i ded.. I n addi tion , t hi s will p r ovide a "margin of sa fe ty " in the e vent t he E-0 popul at i o n is e xceed e d . STAF F CO NCLUSIO N: Staff f eel s tha t the cr i teri a prop osed b y t he Sanit a t i on Distr i c t on both Project.Capacity and Desi gn Criteria f or the Santa Ana Canyon Ar ea hav e been we ll thought out and reasonably conclud ed . We concur with the c o s t e ffe ctive a ppr oach of p rovid i ng ·capacity f o r t he Santa Ana Can yon joint ly wi th sewer i ng t he Uppe r Wa t e r s h ed i n Riverside and San Berna rdino Co unti es . A copy o f Ch ief Engin e e r , Ray Lewi s ' me mo t o Ge neral Manager , F red Ha r per of the Sanitati on District , d a ted Se ptember 19 , 1 974, is attached a nd we have a s k ed Do n Mart i n s on o f Lowr y and Assoc i a tes , Consul tant Project Eng i neers , to be p resent atthe Februa ry 18 , 1 97 5 , Ci t y Co unc il Meeti ng to ans wer any par ticular q u e stions . RECOMMENDATI ON: That 'th e Ci ty Co u nci l approve i n c oncept by minute o rder both t h e c apac i t i e s and design c r i t e r i a as pro posed by t he Distric t f or Rea c h I II , Santa An a Rive r Interceptor sewe r. EXH I BIT C -Page 3 of 10 .. i j I ."[ Engineer's Report No '5-23 February 11, 1975 Santa Ana River Intercaptor Sewer-Request by Orange County County sanitation District to .Approve Capaoity and Design Concept ~v.'{~~ Community Development BM/TFN/cs Attached: Memo of September 19, 1974-Letter to City Engineer from Donald Martinson, Lowry & Associates cc: Ray Lewis,.Orange County Sanitation District Don Martinson,·Lowry & Associates EXHIBIT C -Page 4 of 10 a .. · 121 Gaj/ U},H/.if!.glon Avenue, San/a ".Ana , Cah/omia 92701 (714) 5 41-5301 February 4, 1975 Mr. Ben Minamide City Engineer CITY OF PLACENTIA 401 East Chapman Placentia, California COMM. DEV. r ,... 15 .. . , ,.,~.- 1. • ' • ::! I '.J I I . -ENGINEERING Subject: Capacities and Design Criteria for Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer Dear Mr. Minamide: In accordance with our conversation yesterday; transmitted herewith is the Memorandum from Ray Lewis, Chief En g ineer of the County Sanitation District, in regard to the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer. Th e Memorandum spells out in detail our proposal for th e capacities and de- sign criteria for the next reach o~ the sewer proj e ct. Also enclosed is a copy of our Project Report .which was submitte d to the State Water Resources Control Board as a ;equirement for ob taining a Federal and State grant for the project. Section X of the Re port deals with a portion of the project in Orange County. Th e reac hes shown on Figures IV-A and IV-B in Section X of the Report corres pond t o the reach numbers as shown in Ray Lewis's memo •. Wh~t i~ n~~Qed .a~_J:l:ti~-1?..Q.int in t~m~_i.~ _;?,n a~tJ._'2.I!.. . .!?y __ t;_4~ City Council of ~~~cent1a._ appXQY~~g_:;~_g_~l!~r C!J_c_q_l}~.ept th ~.Q_a_c;;i..t_;i.~s _?_D._~ __ d_es i_&!l crite~~~ as proposed in the Project Report ~ng a s f urthe r e xp l a ined by the ~eino of Ray Lewis. The City of Anaheim has already taken· action in improving this concept, and the Sanitation District will be sending a copy of their action directly to you. After you have had a chance to review this material, I would b e g lad to meet with you to further explain it to you if you so desire . Very truly yours, LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES t~~i'/'4~~4///l-- DONALD ·7. ~T-INSON DJM:rtk EXHIBIT C Page 5 of 10 Enclosures 10963 SAN DIEGO M ISSION ROAD, SAN O I EG~, CALIFO RNIA 9 2 10 8 .. • NEMO TO: FRED A. HARPER 9-19-74 FROM: SUBJECT: RAY LEWIS, Chief Engineer Capaciti e s and De s ign Criteria .for Santa Ana River Interceptor La Palma and Grove Streets to Orange County Boundary In the design of the· Santa Ana River Interceptor, Job No. 2-14-3, from the intersection of La. Palma and Grove Streets to the Orange County .boundary, it is my opinion that there are two major areas .for consideration: 1. The capacities which are to be provided for the underdeveloped area in the Santa Ana Canyon 2. The design criteria to be .used in establishing the physical size of the in~erceptor . 1be former, I feel, is a policy decision which must be established by the Board, but the later should be based on sound engineering practices. DESIGN CAPACITIES On March 1st of this year, a project repqrt was submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and the Environmental Protection Ag~ncy wherein the staff had presented certain capacities which we felt were consisten~ with the guidelines established by the· State and EPA, but which also incorporated the general concensus of the affected planning agencies. Basically, this interceptor sewer has been • designed to accommodate two distinctive flows: 1. Flows from the upper basin which are 30 MGD from sources that are presently degrading grotmdwate! supplied of Orange County and are a part of the Basin Pl~n under consideration by the State and Environmental Protection Agency. These flows are from the following sources: A. Existing industrial dischargers (Includes Sunkist Lemon Products, Culligan, Norton Air Force Base, ~o. California Edison) B. Agricultural Waste C. Extracted Grotmdwater D. Temporary Municipal Wastes and Municipal Brines TOTAL 5 MGD 9 MGD 11 MGD S MGD 30 MGD 2. Projected Flows from the Santa Ana Car.yon are a within Or a n ge C o ~nty. Th .is accumulated total has been estimated at 5 MGD and is based upon the E-0 population projections tor this drainage are a. EXHIBIT C -Page 6 of 10 .. .......... E~o population projections have been developed by. the State -an~ Environmental Protec~ion Agency and are des.igneq as a ·series E f~rtility with a "0" net migration to California, beginning July 1, 1971. The E-0 fertility rate has been established by the Department of Finance for each County in the .State. Orange County's Series E fertility is approximately 2 1/2 percent annual growth~ This must be compared to a 6 to 8 percent annual growth which the Districts have sustained in the past two decades. The E-0 growth population projections an.d design capacities associated. therewith are compared below with the capacity requirements as proj,ected in the District No. 2, 1972 Master Plan and the present zoning in the area. CAPACITY REQUIREMENTS (MGD) REACH E-0 1972 MASTER PLAN PRESENT LAJ\TD USE ZONING -'74 2 5 36 25 3 3 26 16 4· 2 19 14 5 2 13 ' 8 6 0 2 1 7 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 The various reaches as indicated above are shown on the attached maps which were included with the afo!ementioned project report. DESIGN CRITERIA Utilizing the design capacities as established by the E-0 population projections as described above, the staff has presented to the State and Environmental Protection Agency a design which, I feel, reflects sound engineering practices for this interceptor which will extend from Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley eventually to the City of San Bernardino, a distance of approximately 65 miles. I feel it is essential that the design criteria reflect a safe operational mode for this sewer. To design and ope.rate any sewer to flow full is contrary to sound engineering practices. Any sewer must be able to "breathe" for ventilation purposes. Air is normally drawn down into the sanitary sewer.'by the flow of sewage and a lso the exchange of the air due to the rise and fall of the sewage. Manholes are vented F.XIIIBJT c -Pal!e 7 of 10 to allow this process •. The principal reasons for ventilation are best described in the-ASCE Manual of· Pr~ctices No . 37 which has been extracted and included herein : 1. -io remove ror satisfactory dis~osa1 any odorous air which may tend in some p laces to cs.cape from the sewer. 2. To maintain as.ewer atmosphere which is not excessively depicted in oxygen. In most sewers natural ventilation will keep oxygen above 90% of no r mal; but in some very long sewers with little natural venti latio n . or in places whc;re the free flow o f air is obstructed, lhe concen t ration may drop to less than half of no rmal. Depletion of oxygen in the atmosphere reduces surface aeration of the sewage str eam and may cause sulfide production. 3. To dry out walls of structures and reduce corrosion where sulfide.is present in . t he sewage. This can he effective for protection of manholes, junction chambers. etc:, b ut it is doubtful if any substantial' length of sewer can be dried cffect;vcly . 4. To reduce explosive atmospheres. Normally all flammable gases and liquids are excluded by ordinances and the presence of the&e materials is an abnormal o~ acciden t al occurrence in sewers. This is not predictable and is not comm o n enough to warrant forced ventilat io n of all the sewers but is an incidental advantage of. ven- tilation where it is required for other reasons. The de s ign as presented to the State and EPA is designed to accommodate the E-0 flow with the sewer to flow at 0. 65 ·depth bf the internal. ·diameter of the pipe. With this depth, a sewer will operate at a ?elf-cleaning velocity and provide adequate ventilation for the operation thereof. endeniab l y, the sewer can be operated at a greater depth to accormnodate flows in excess of the E-0 populati~n pr ojections . The capacities which are prov.ided at subsequent fl ow depth · are tabulated below: ALTERNATE DEPTH CAPACITIES, MGD REACH E-0 CAP. 0.65 DEPTIJ CAP. 0 .75 DEPTH CAP . ·o;85 DEPTH CAP . 2 35 35 .4() 52 3 33 '. 33 38 43 4 32 32 38 43 s 32 32 37 42 6 30 30 37 42 7 30 30 37 42 8 30 30 34 39 EXHIBIT C -Pag e 8 of 10 .. . .. It must be kept in mind that in the design of any sew e r system, after the flows and criterias have been established, the selection of the pipe size-is ~redicatcd upon the commercial sizes manufactured by the various pipe companies. for comparison, there is only a six inch differential (39" v e rsus 33") in pipe size to accommodate the E-0 population capacities and the present land use zone capa~ities if the same· design criteria was appli ed to each respective capacity. Sewer pipe is manufactured in 3" increments in sizes greater than 18". Assuming that the design criteria was to provide for a pipe flowing ·full to acconunodate the E-0 population (which would be contrary to sound engine ering practices as indicated above) and the District had to _provid e for relie f capacities at some future time in the event that E-0 pop~lation projections were exceeded o r additional flows were necessary to accommodate discharges from the upper basin, the District would be subject to a relief capacity cost of approximately $~ million as compared to the $863,000 oversizing cost as shown on the cost s unnn ary below: COST SUMMARY Estimated Cost of Design Project (39"-51") Estimated Cost of Grant Eligible Project (36"-.45") Oversizing Cost Sanitation District's share of Design Proj e ct. Total Sanitation District's Cost Cost of Project to Carry Total District Capacity (24"-36") $7,26 6 ,00 0 6,403,0 00 863,000 448,00 0 1,311,000 4,562,000 The staff and design e.ng ineer will have available additional map s a nd exhibits to more fully explain th e de tails of the design a s r e comm e nd e d b y th e sta ff to the State and Environmental Protection Agenc y . EXHIBIT C -Pa ge 9 of. 10 ~=~p~~ -.~ r :·. :-~-. ::-:: 1 __ ,, J ,,, ~~ .. .. ·.::.. ...... .} ___ ,( : ; . --;: ... ' . -I •; .' .. -1 ... .. -~~. . ,. .. . ---., ... --~--?.7' . ' : ---------------------------------- EXHIBIT c - .. ·":". J flQURE 2 L OWRY a ASSOC I ATES ............... -""" .,,,.~. • L EGENO EXISTING TRUNK FACILITIES ---PR OPOSED TRUNK FA CILITIES DISTRICT BOUNDARY . --FACILIT IES UNOER CON STRUCTIC ~. I . · -t SERVICE AR E A REACH m: SANTA ~A WATER SH ED PROJEC.T AUTHORIT Y . I ; I . ~ -- PROJECT REPQ;H -SMHA ANA REGION AL 1 NTE~'-'Pr:: ~ GROV E STRE E T TO OR .1N GE COUN TY UN€ SERVICE A_REA ,.,.. ....... _ REACH liI SANTA ANA REG IONAL JNTE RCEP'T OR L!>""y • A 550CI A1'[S I P:C_e RU~~-~~~~··--· -·--- ---. •. .-- ' Page 10 of 10 MAR 1 J 1975 '· C>F ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY 400 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST SANTA AHA, CALIFORNIA TE LE PHONE: 834·2300 AREA CODE 714 MAll.IN(i, AODRC5S : P. 0. BOX 4048 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 H. G. OSBORNE DIRECTOR FILE . Board ot Supervisors Administration Building 515 N. Sycamore Santa Ana, California 92701 · SUBJECT: Santa Ana Regional Interceptor, Grove Street. to Orange County Line; Air Quality Resolution (3rd and 4th Supervisorial Districts) SYNOPSIS: Gentlemen: As part of federal grant requirements, the Sanitation Districts of Orange County has requested that a finding be made by your Honorable Board concerning the air quality im plications of the Santa Ana Regional Interce ptor. The EMA and the .Planning Commission have reviewed t his project and proposed the attached resolution which indic ate s 1at the project may interfere with the attainment or mainten a 2 of ai r quality standards, but the project is needed to solve a critical water quality problem, and that it is recognized that land use and transportation restrictions may have to be implemented to meet air quality standards. One of the necessary prerequisites to federal approval of grant funds for the Santa Ana · Regional Interceptor, Grove Street to Orange County Line (Reach III) is a resolution from the County of Orange concerning the air quality i mp lications of this project. The Board of Supervisors has been asked by the project sponsor_, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, to make one of the following findings:· 1. That the air quality implications of the project have been reviewe d and that the growth associated with the proj ect will not prevent the attainment or maintenance of air quality standards, or 2. That the project may interfere with the attainment or maintenance of air quality standards, but the project is needed to solve a critical vrnter quality problem, and that it is recogniz ed that land use and transportation restrictions may have to be implemente_d to meet air· quality standards. E.XHIBIT D -Page 1 of 3 Page 2 .~ .. . . The Santa Ana Regional Interceptor, (SARI) has two basic functions. First, the Regional \.later Quality Boa .rd has established a nondegradation policy for dissolved minerals in the upper Santa Ana River watershed . Studies show that the only effective method for achieving this is the removal of salts (brines) from the upper basin. Thus, an interceptor with a capacity of 30 MGD, is proposed to transport brines to thP. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County facilities in Fountain Valley, for treatment and ocean disposal. An additional 5 MGD in capacity is pro- posed for the Santa Ana Canyon Area (Reach III of the SARI) to handle domestic waste~ there. The 35 -MGD capacity Santa Ana Regional Interceptor will join the lower reaches (Reaches I and II) of the interceptor, portions of which al- ready have been built under the state grants for clean water program. The in.ter- ~eptor parallels the Santa Ana River. Due to the fact that this project is designed to provide for additional development in Santa Ana Canyon, an area of high air pollution problems already, it must be conclud~d that the project may interfere with the attainment and maiRtenance of air quality standards. According to the County Air Pollution Control District, there are certain inadequacies in th_e material submitted to the County by the applicant which hinder an effective evaluation of the actual air quality impacts. However even if more detailed information was submitted, it is extremely improbable that :the conclusions reached would be any different from that expressed above. On March 3, 1975 the Planning Commission approved and recommended to your Honorable Board for adoption the attached resolution. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Reso 1 uti on . Respectfully Submitted, H. G. Osborne, Director HGO:JLA:cc Attachment . EXHIBIT D -Page 2 of 3 .. " PROPOSED RESOLUTION .. . Whereas the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County has proposed a project designated the 11 Santa Ana Regional Interceptor, Reach III, and Whereas this project provides for the beneficial removal of saline waters from the .Santa Ana River Watershed and domestic wastes from the Santa Ana Canyon Area, and Whereas this project will provide for additional growth in the Santa Ana Canyon area to the extent that such growth may interfer~ wtih the attainment and · maintenance of air quality standards, Therefore be it resolved that the Orange County Board of Supervisors recognizes that the project may interfere with the attainment or maintenance of air quality standards, but the project is needed to solve a critical 111ater quality problem, and that it is recognized that ·land use and transportation restrictions may have to be implemented to meet .air· quality standards. EXHIBIT ·D -Page 3 of 3 , UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL Pl\OTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 100 C/-LIFORNIA STRl:.ET SAN FRANCISCO. CALIFORNIA 94111 FEB 2 7 1975 To All Interested Agencies and Public Groups Gentlemen: In accordance vJith the procedures for the preparation of environmentcl impcct state:nents, an environmental review has been performed on the pro- posed Agency ac tion below: Official Proj ect Name: · Purpose of Project: Applicant: Location: Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reaches III .& IV To provide air economic;ol disposcl m2fr::Jd for high-salinity waste::: that ',vould ct r~2n :ise d egrade the ground 'Na ter of th2 U.pper S-:::-i ta. Ana Basin Santa ·A na Watershed Project Authority ; In northeastern Orange County starti:;g a t tl:'..2 Grove Street-La Pill.ma Avenue intersection and heading up the Santa Ana Canyon to the San Bernardino County li ne , continuing through the County north of the Sc.nta .2.~c. River for approxl·ma .. elv LI QflQ fp.,,; .. to tho Pi·r.=,··-ir<o J ---~ .l -I -•--'-t. -..-.o..._'. .._i ~-_......, County line, and continuir:ig in Ri'-'£rsice County through the :P r a do Dam to t ermin ate . ap;:-!·o;d- ma t e ly 2, 000 feet no:::th of th8 dam. ·Estimated Federal Financial Share: $5, 822 , 738 (F ebruary 197 11) . . Estimuted State cmd Loccl Financial Share: $1, 94 0, 912 (February 197 () EXHIBIT E -Page 1 of 4 , -2- After performing an environmental review of the project, this Agency has decided that an ·environmental impact statement is not required . An ·environmental impact appraisal, which summari zes the review and the reasons ·why a statement is not required, is on file at t he above office c:i.nd is available for the public scrutiny upon request. Sinc;erely, )· . . "/ . ···1· .. . . ' . i / . ' .t ·' • ... ~ ,,-, I . ' ' • ' '",/ ',/I ~ I ',_,( ;J..-( _{....._, . .'/ ·' . -....·-·. ~ ··/ P 1 De Falco, Jr. ; · yegional Administrator ; / \. EXHIBIT E -Page 2 of 4 .. .'r , California Distribution List 1. State Water Resources Control Board Division o~ Water Quality Control 1416 Ninth Stree t S_acramento CA 95814 2 . Office of Int~rgovernmental · Management State Clearinghou se 1400 Tenth Stree t, Room 108 Sacramento CA 95814 3. Environmenta l Protection Agency, Washington DC 20460 Office of Fed eral Ac tiv ities Office of Public Affa irs Office of Wa t er Programs , Planning & Inter agency Program Division Office of Congressional Affairs Office of Congressional & Inte rgovernmental Relations, Region IX 4. . Southern California Association of Go vernments .1111 West Sixth Street, #40 1 Los Angeles CA 90017 5. State of California Air Reso.urces i3oard Attention: Bill Lockett 6. 7 . 8. 1709 -11th Street Sacramento C."Di. 95814 Orange County Sanitation Di~trict Attentio n: Fred Harpe r P .0 . Box 8127 Fountciin ·Valley CA 92708 Santa Ana Watershed Project Autho rity Attention: Robe rt rvioore 7150 Brockton Ave nue Riverside CA 92505 Howard And e rso n 4465 Nin t h Stree t R i verside CA 92501 . EXHIBI T E -Page 3 of 4 ' -2- 9. Environmental Improvement Agenc y Attention: James DeAguilera County of San Bernardino 316 l111ountain View San Bernardino CA 92415 10. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region 6833 Indiana Avenue, Suite 1 Riverside CA 92506 ' EXHIBIT E -Page 4 of 4 ..... 7 ERNEST A. BRYANT, Ill MANAGER February 25, 1975 Mr. Ray E. Lewis RANCHO SANTA ANA 238!50 ESPERANZA ROAD ANAHEIM. CALIFORNIA Q2S06 Chief Engineer .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO ·. 2 P. O. Box 8127 · Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Alignment of Santa Ana Interce ptor Sewer through Rancho Santa Ana Dear Mr. Lewis: We h a ve revi.ewed the alignment for the subj ec.t project as shown on the maps prepared by Lowry and Asso'ciates. We agree with the alignment shown in g~neral on the attached map and more specifically shown in green on the 1 11 = 200 feet topo strip map. ' We have no objection to the commencement of the final design of the project along this alignment. We understand that the right-of-way acquisition will be discussed at a later date. Very truly yours,. · ERJ.~EST A. BRYANT, III Manager, Rancho Santa Ana EAB:md EXHIBIT F .. T E L E r H 0 N E :538·2351 PRESl!:>F.NT ·R. D . LF.WIS 154 NORTH GLASSELL STREET P. o. Box 6 VIC!!:-P;"IESICENTS F.. E. PANKEY H. E. B,\LM~P. Oron.t;J e, Colifol"nio 92666 February 11, 1975 GECR~ARY -MANAGC:R WILLIAM a. WEST ,. County Sanitation District #2 of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Gentlemen-: We have reviewed the proposed alignment of the Santa Ana River Interc e~te r Se~er, spe cifically the Alignment "A" as recorrunend ed by Lowry and Associates in their project report dated February 19, 1974. We are in general agr eeraent as to the Alignment 11 A 11 as recom.'11 e nded, ·subj ec t to an additional revie\•; of the final plans when prepared. As we have suggested, th ~r e are a· few specific requests which we wil l like to include before the specif ications for the contract are written. • Very truly yours, (--. /. ;··--:·~~<>/ -........ \ A ( .. ·; ., L ~iJ:-... D. c~HANSON -- Secretary-Manager EXHIBIT G O I RF.CTOH4 R . O. LEWI::> E. E. Pl\N:<EY • H. E . BALMER F.. T . WATSON H . NITTA . . ,. SAVI DEVELOPMENT CO., INC. P . 0. BOX 27 154 NOfffH GLASSELL srnEET ORANGE. CALIFORNIA D26G6 PHONE 538. 633G · · February 11, 1975 County Sanitation District #2 of Orange Cou~ty Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: 11~· - We have reviewed the proposed alignment of the Santa Ana River Intercepter Sewer, specifically the Alignment "A 11 as recornm·ended by 'Lowry and Associates in the,i.r project report dated February 19, 1974. We are in general agreem~nt as to the Alignment "A" as recor:u-nended, subject to ·an additional revie\·1 of the final pl~ns when prepared. As we have suggested, there are a few s~eclfi c requests which we will like· to include before the specifications for the contract are written . Very truly yours, EXHIBIT H .. .... . .-~· March 12, 1975 CO.UNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ·or ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA · P. 0 . BOX 8127 108-4-4 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71-4) 5-40-2910 (714) 962-2-411 TO:· MEMBERS OF ·THE SPECIAL SELECTION COMMITTEE FOR LEGAL COUNSEL' Norma Gibbs, Chairpers6n ....- Ph1111p Cox /.-- Jess Perez 0- Don Saltarelli L-- John Store i.-- Bernie Svalstad v Frances Wopd .._. Attached is a compilation of the selections made by six of the seven Committee members. Chairperson Gibbs has requested that the C9mmittee meet immediately follow- ing the adjournment of the Joint Boards this evening ~o determine those candidates which the Committee members wish to interview. · FAH:hje Enclosure cc: Joint Chairman Winn Fred A. Harper General Manag~r i : March 12 ,· 1975 · COMPOSITE OF SELECTIONS MADE BY SPECIAL COMMITTEE FOR LEGAL COUNSEL Name Stewart, Woodruff & Frazee 1055 North Main St., Suite 1020 ·Santa Ana, CA 92701 · Robert F. Waldron · ·2020 North Broadway Suite 102 Santa Ana, CA 92706 Alexander Bowie 610· N~wport Center Drive Suite 500 . · ·:Newport Beach, CA . 92660 · ·· Davis and Killian 4600 Campus Drive Suite .500 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Patterson, Pqst & Smith 1200 North Main St. Suite 900 Santa Ana, CA . 92701 Martin E. Whelan, Jr., ·rnc . 7915 S. Painter Avenue P. o. Box 4159 Wbittier, CA 90607 > . John C. Woolley, Inc •. . 1·2550 Brookhurst. St. Garden ~rove,_ CA 92640 George G. Logan 1151 Dove Drive Suite 220 Newport -Bea~h, CA ·92660 . ··Ebben and Brown 615 S. Flower Street • Suite 1201 · · Los Ang e les, CA 90017 ". 2/?..7/75 Votes ·Received · 6 .6 4 4 4 .4 1 : 3 . 2 3/11/75 Votes Received 6 6 3 4 . 6 6 2 2 / cJ.C S. D . E/OD t:JF ?Rc>P5RTY W EST EL£VATl()/V s {! c;.c. P R.'O P.ER T'I i;r --· -----· ~1 j : ; I 'I I r f I t , I 1 • I 1 · · ! ... ' . • • 1 . l ... ~ • l , • I --.._....._\"'"'!-__ _ Agenda Item No. /6 March 6, 1975 COUNTY SANITATION D!STRICTS at ORANGE CoUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8 ?27 IQll.4.4 EU.IS A VENUE FOUNTAIN VAU.EY, CALI FORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (7l4) 962-24 11 STAFF REPORT RE: REVISION OF ANNEXATION POLICIES AND FEES FOR DISTRICTS 2, 3, 7, and 11. On January 8, 1975, the Boards referred this matter back to the s taff for further explanation. Districts 2 & 7 Presently, in Districts 2 and 7, the a nnexa t ion fees are identical, $526. They are based on the 1 965 and 1968 con- struction estimates for sewer facili ties to serve annexable territories. Beginning in ·1970, the two District Boards autho- rized an annual escalation to reflect EPA sewer construc tion cost index increases for the Los Ang eles area, or a minimum annual increase of $10 p er a cre. District 3 District No. 3 currently has an annexation fee of $1016, which is the net worth per acre plus $150 . With the excep tion of the U. S. Naval Weapons St ation near S eal Beac h , the Distr ict has ~nly about 5 acres left to annex. District 11 District No. 11 adopted an annexation policy in 196 3, which was based on a n estimate of trunk sewer facil i ties to serve annexab le property at that time. The annexation fee ha s remained at a constant figure, $66 per quarter acre, which is equivalent to $264 per a cre . Th e net worth acreage fee at this time would b e $407 . District 5 On Febru a ry 18th, the District 5 Board h eld an adjourned meeting and a t that time reaffirmed its position to maintai n its annexati on fee of ~1017/acre , which is based on the net worth per acre of the Distric t. It is the staff 's recommendation that the Boards adopt a uniform annexation policy re l ative to annexation f e es effective July 1, 1975, which is to be computed annually at th e be g inning of each fiscal year (July 1), based on the net wo rth of the Di s - trict divided by the acreage within the District . ·suMMARY OF DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION POLICY Annexation Policy Resolution: Effective Date: Provision for Processing Fee: Basis of Annexation Fee: Current Annexation Fee: Provision for Escalating Annexation Fee Next Date Annexation Fee Escalates: Remarks: 3-12-67 All fees w/ $325 minimum Based on 1965 Estimate of Sewer Facilities to serve annexable territory. Date paid governs fee $526/acre Beginning 1-1 -7 0 escalated annual ly to refl~ct EPA Sewer Construct i on Cost Ind ex for L.A. Area or minimum of $10/acre (October Index Us e d). 1-1-76 Net worth acreage fee would be '$752 : ., ... SUMMARY OF DISTRICT NO. 3 ANNEX ATION POL°ICY Annexation Policy Resolution: Effective Date: Provision for Processing Fee: ·Basis of Annexation Fee: Current Annexation Fee: Prov·isiori for Escalating Annexation Fee: N~xt Date Annexation Fee · Escalates: Remarks: 72-6-3 .. 1-1-72 · All fees w/ $325 minimum Net worth per acre of Dis t r i c t plus $150. Da t e of Bo~rd appro val governs fee $1016/acre Beginning 1-1-7 3 escalated ann ually based on n et wo rt h o f Dis t ri c t preceding j une 30 t h ·pius $1 50 1-1-76 Net worth a crea ge fee wou ld be $866 if $1 50 fee is omit ted. Recommend eli mi n a tion o f $150 fe e SUMMARY OF DISTRICT NO. 7 ANNEXATION POLICY Annexation Policy Resolution: 68-88-7 Effective Date: 10-9-68 Provision for Processing Fee: · All fees w/ $325 minimum ·Basis of Annexation Fee: Based on 1968 Estimate of Trunk Sewer Facilities to serve annexable territory. Date paid governs fee Current Annexation Fee: $526/acre Provision for Escalating Beginnirtg 1-1-70 escalated annually Annexation Fee: to reflect EPA Sewer Construction Cost Index ·for L . .A. Area or minimum· of $10/acre (October Index Used) Next Date Annexation Fee Escalates: 1-1-76 Remarks: Net worth acreage fee would be $690 " .. SUMMARY OF DISTRICT NO. 11 ANNEXATION POLICY Annexation Policy Resolution: Effective Date: Provision for Processing Fee: Basis of Annexation Fee: Current Annexation Fee: Provision for Escalating Annexation Fee: Next Date Annexation Fee Escalates: Remarks: 10-1-63 None Based on 1964 Estimate of Trunk Sewer Facilities to serve annexable territory $66 per 1/4 acre .w/ $75 minimum. (Equivalent to $264/acre). None Net worth acreage fee wbuld be $~07. Under current policy, have agr~e ment with City of Huntington Beach to collect· fees -..... "' DRAFT 3/6/75 RESOLUTION NO. ESTABLISHING ANNEXATION POLICY A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD PF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO._ OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING FEES AND PROCEDURES CON- CERNING ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT * • • * * * • * * * * WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to establish certain requirements for territory seeking annexa€ion to this Dis trict . . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT. RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the proponents of any application for annexa- tion of any territ.ory to the District shall, as a condition to securing app·roval of the Board of Directors of the District to such annexation, comply with the following: Requirements: (a) Payment of all costs incurred in processin.g the annexation. (b) From the· period beginning ,·and ------- ending -------' payment to the District of the sum of per acre of territory so annexed. Beginning ~-------- and annually thereafter , the sum to be paid per acre for the eDsuing 12 months will be the net worth per acre of the District on the preceding June 30th . The date of approval by the Board of D~rectors of the annexation shall govern the amount of the fee per acre hereinabove established. (c) That the annexed territory be subject to the .terms . and conditions of all ordinances pertaining to fees for connection to the District's facilities, and use of.said facilities. (d) The annexed territory shall be annexed into an appropriate sewering agency, such as a city, for the purpose of maintaining and operating the local sewer system including pumping stations and force mains. (e) The territory, upon annexation, shall be subject to all ad valorem taxes required for the retirement of the existing and future bonds of the District. (f) Any area within the terr itory annexed shall be concurrently withdrawn from any Special District which has levied ad valorem taxes or other charges for the same services within the ter ritory to be annexed that County Sanitation Distric t No . will provide following annexation , to avo i d an overlappiqg taxing entity. Section 2. That the procedures for annexations of territory to the District shall be as set forth on Sc~edule ''A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution , and the District's staff is hereby directed to give to the proponents of any proposed· annexation a copy Df Schedule "A" outlining the procedures to be followe d. Section 3. That the staff be directed to transmit to the Local Agency Formation Commission a certified copy of this resolution. Section 4 . That the provisions of this resolution shall ap~ly to any annexation of territory to the District initiated on or after Section 5 . That all other resolutions or motions i n co nflic t herewith are hereby repe a l e d and made of ·no further effect . -2 - SUMMARY OF LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION'S AND DISTRICT NO. 2'S ACTIONS RE PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 8 -TRACT NO. 4980 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOo 2 PURPOSE OF ANNEXATION The purpose of this annexation is to provide public sanitary sewer service for approximately 8 acres of territory proposed to be annexed in the vicinity of Mallard Street and Collins Avenue in the City of Orange. PURPOSE OF HEARING Because the territory proposed to be annexed is presently inhabited, it is necessary to hold this public hearing to determine if there is a majority protest against annexation. This is a result of the developer of the territory failing to annex the area to the District prior to development when said property was annexed to the City of Orange. If less than 25% of the number of landowners within territory owning not more than 25% of the assessed valuation of land therein, and less than 25% of the voting power of voters entitled to vote as a result of residing in or owning property within the territory, protest, then following the hearing, the Board may order annexation of the territory. If more than 25% but less than 50% of the number of landowners within the territory, or more than 25% but less than 50% of the voting power protest, then an election must be held. If more than 50% of the assessed valuation or more than 50% of the voting power protest, than the annexation must be abandoned. ASSESSED VALUATION AND VOTING POWER: Assessed valuation of the territory has been determined to be $394,070. Number of voters in the territory has been determined to be 58. IF ANNEXATION FAILS: In the event annexation fails, the Board of Directors on October 10, 1973, declared their intent to levy a sewer service charge in the amount of $10 or more per residential unit per month. TO DATE, THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS HAVE TAKEN PLACE: On October 10, 1973, the Board of Directors took the following actions: Adopted Resolution Noo 73-170-2, declaring a special exception for Tract No. 4980 and waived District connection fees therefor; and, Denied request of the City of Orange for waiver of annexation fees on Tract No. 4980; and, Adopted Resolution No. 73-149-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex the territory and setting fees therefor at one-half the established amount, pursuant to the declaration of a special exception for said annexation; and, Declared intent to levy a sewer service charge in the amount of $10 per unit per month if annexation is not completed. On April 24, 1974, the Local Agency Formation Commission adopted Resolution No. 74-39, declaring its findings regarding the proposed annexation, approving said annexation, and directing County Sanitation District No. 2 to proceed with the annexation. (Proceedings have been held in abeyance pending final corrections to the map and legal description by the proponent.) -2- On February 19, 1975, the Board of Directors adopted Resolution No. 75-20-2, fixing March 12, 1975, at 8:30 p.m. as the date and time of hearing on proposed Annexation No. 8 -Tract No. 4980, and establishing procedures for filing of written protest. Notice of the hearing has been continuously posted on the Districts' bu 11 et in boa rd s i nee February 20, 19 75. On February 20, documents were mailed to owners of record within the territory proposed to be annexed, affected cities and special districts, District No. 2 Directors, and other interested parties, containing the following information: Letter of explanation Brochure explaining the District's function Official Notice of Public Hearing Maps indicating the area to be annexed Copy of resolution fixing the hearing Legal notice of the hearing was published in the Santa Ana Register on February 26 and March 5, 1975. To date, ----written protests have been filed with the Secretary. -3- ~TATE OF .CALIFORNIA THE RF.SOURCES AGENCY Agenda Item No. 3 9 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY CONTROL 1100M 1015, RESOURCES BUILDING ~ NINTH STIZEET • SACRAMENTO 9'81.4 ..._.,.. . MAR 5 1975 Mr. Robert E. .Moore Manager Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority 7150 Brockton Avenue Riverside, CA· 92506 ·Dear Mr. MJore: ED:t<IDND G. BROWN JR. t fN'o/Jk£fill!Jc~nrnor Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reaches III and IV, Project No. 74-0951 2 F. Y. 1973-74 2 Concept Approval This office has reviewed the project report and the supplemental information for the subject project. The Division of Water Quality with the concurrence of the Environmental Protection Agency hereby approves the concept of constructing Reaches III and IV of the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) through Prado Dam as shown on Figure IX-1 of the project report and described in this letter. ELIGIBLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The foll.owing _items will be eligible for grant participation: Reaches III and IV of the ·SARI for a peak fl~w of 30 MGD flowing full. The eligibility of the interceptor oversizing will be determined by a ratio of eligible peak flow, flowing full over the Design peak flow flowing full, or size to accommodate 30 MGD, whichever is greater. The eligible project cost for the above facilities is estimated at $7,763,650. CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT APPRoVAL: This concept approval is contingent on the following: 1. Receipt of the complete final plans and specifications by the date specified below. If the plans and specification are not submitted by this date, concept approval may be withdrawn. 2. A revised sewer use ordinance which imposes a graduated limitation on the minimum concentration of dissolved solids which may be dis- charged to the SiLtU. J • Mr. Robert E •. Moore Project No. 74-0951 - 2 - 3. Resolution of the financing plan problems as stated in the November 19, 1974," letter from Mr. Gillette to Mr. Warren. 4. A revision of Ordinance 74-1 providing a reimbursement for lateral construction. The formulation should provide for equitability to all users regardless of their distance from the SARI. 5. All four water districts must agree to and sign the Joint Powers Agreement concerning the formation of the project authority prior to certification. AUTHORIZATION AND INSTRUCTIONS TO PREPARE FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS: Concept approval includes approval of design criteria provided in the project report and is your authorization to proceed with the preparation of final plans and specifications. Upon completion of final plans and. specifications, the following· must be submitted. to this.office for review: 1. Two signed sets· of the final plans and specifications. 2. Two copies of complete Operat~on & Maint~nance Manuci.l in draft form. 3. Outline of Proposed Instructional Program in conformance with State guidelines. , 4. Upd.ated project cost estimate which includes a breakdown of all engineering costs, (i.e., project report, plans and specifications, inspection, soil testing, etc.), 0 & M Manual, Revenue Program, and other costs. The plans, specifications,. and Operation & Maintenance Manual must· be submitted by April 1, 1975. Upon receipt and approval, the State will certify the eligible project to the EPA for a Federal Grant. ADDITIONAL INFORJ.'1ATION ~'ID DOCUMENTS NEEDED PRIOR TO CERTIFICATION: The following additional information and document5 must also be submitted and approved prior to project certificatio~: 1. The documents and requested information contained in the enclosed Clean Water Grant application packet. If the application and supporting documents cannot be returned within 60 days of receipt, please contact this office. Mr. Robert E. Moore Project No. 74-0~51 CONDITIONS OF CERTIFICATION: -3- In addition to any standard provisions, the State and EPA will place the following special conditions on the project certification or any grants that ~ght be awarded 'on this project: 1. The Grantee shall operate its treatment works as a coordinated · ~egional facility providing service on a fair and equitable basis and in accordance with guidelines and regulations of the State Board. 2. A contract to provide for operation and maintenance of the upper basin portion of. the SARI and th~ groundwater extractions must be agreed to, signed, ·and submitted. Tliis concept approval includes only that project described above and does not include any associated projects which may have been referred to in the project report and does not guarantee grant funding on any subsequent project which may be necessary to assure that the approved project is functional. The need for and the sizing of SARI reaches !Va, IVb, and IVc can only be determined after a comprehensive·planning study has determined what salt loads must be removed from each area and commitments have been developed to achieve this removal. Should you have any questions, please contact Robert Gillette, the evaluator. assigned· to your project at (916) 322-4940. Sincerely, frrt1~ f' ~ Larry F. Walker ~ Division Chief M~ager -~lean Water Grant Program cc: CRW.QCB, Santa Ana River Region EPA, Region IX Attention: Russ Beckwith James M. Montgomery Engineers 555 East Walnut Street Pasadena, CA 91101 Attention: Dr. Frank Grant Lowery and Associates 121 East Washington Avenue Santa Ana, CA Attention:. Don Martinson 3/12/75 Joint Chairman Winn: Please announce that the Washington meeting that you and Mr. Harper were scheduled to attend next week has been rescheduled to the middle of April. i .' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) February 21, 1975 Senator John Tunney Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Attention: Ms. Jane Frank Dear Ms • Frank: We have been advised by Lee C. White, general counsel for the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) that Senators Stevenson and Muskie will be meeting some- time during the week of March 3rd to discuss a possible amendment to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (PL 92-500), which would permit the use of local ad valorem taxes as one of several sources of revenue for user charge systems. We are bringing this matter to your attention because without this amendment, our agency will be forced to develop a system of charges for over 400,000 separate connections serving a population of l~ million in more than 24 incorporated cities. The billing system required to effectively collect these charges would significantly add to our Districts' operating costs by as much as 25%, or $700,000 a year additional burden on our users without any improvement in service or water quality. The Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, serving a population exceeding 3~ million, also face this tremendous task of establishing a special charge system. There must be many other agencies throughout California in the same boat. Local public agencies in California, particularly our agency, can demonstrate their ability to finance activities and distribute costs equitably among the users, and thereby maintain an efficient, cost-effective program of wastewater quality control. I, TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 Our Boards of Directors adopted enclosed Resolution No. 74-125 in September, 1974, requesting amendment to the Federal Act to allow the use of ad valorem taxes as a source of revenue for user charge systems. , . ~ . . I Senator John Tunney February 21, 1975 Page Two COUNTY SANITATION. DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 We believe this matter is significant and should be brought to the attention of Senator Tunney. We request that our views from California be made known to Senator Muskie, Chairman of the Subcommittee on Environmental Pollution. Don Winn, Chairman Joint Boards of Directors DW:j Enclosure cc: Rep. Del Clawson 23rd District Rep. Andrew J. Hinshaw 39th District Rep. Jerry M. Patterson 34th District Rep. Charles E. Wiggins 25th District Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago Lee C. White ~ '// \ ·J' 3/12/75 Joint Chairman Winn: Please announce that the Washington meeting that you and Mr. Harper were scheduled to attend next week has been rescheduled to the middle or April. ~MEETING DATE March 12 , 1975 TIME 7 :30 p .m. DISTRICTS l ,2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ,7 , & 11 DISTRICT 1 DIEDRICH ····BATTIN ······~ ---- GARTHE) ······EVANS·······~ ---- R I MA· • • • • • • • v ---- (LANGLEY).···· SALTARELLI··~ ---- DISTRICT 2 (Fl;JJNG) •••.••• CHAPUT······~ ---- . ~NS) ••• ·••· CALLAHAN····~ ___ _ DIEDRICH)···· CLARK·······~ ___ _ EVANS)······· GARTHE • • • • • • ~ ___ _ NEVI l-). · · · · ··GRAHAM· • • • • · ~ ___ _ TH OM) •• • • • • • • KAYWOOD· • • · • ~ __ __ FOX) ••• •••·• ·MAC KAIN • • • • ~ ___ _ PERRY· • • • • • • v" ___ _ !SVA LS TAD) ····SCOTT· • • • • • · ~ ___ _ PEREZ).······ TEMPLE······~ ___ _ DUNNE)······ ·WINN········~ ___ _ ROOT)······· ·WOOD········~ ___ _ DISTRICT 3 CMACKAIN) •.••• FOX·········~ ---- AMO · • • • • • • • • __.£._ ___ _ !NUIJENS) ·····ARB ISO•·····~ ___ _ BLAC KM AN) ···MC KNEW • • • ~ ___ _ COLLI NS) · • • • ·BYRNE· • • • • • • ~ ___ _ HOMRI GHAUSEN) COX·· • · • • · • · ~ ___ _ CULVER······~ ___ _ ~MEYER) ·······DAVIS·······~ ___ _ EVANS) • • • • • • ·GARTHE • · • • • • --___ _ THOM) ········K AYWOOD·····~ IXOUNG) ·······NEVIL······· ---==== ==== 1· 1D) ········ROOT ········ ...- b-rE DRI CH) ····S CHMIT······ a----- LACAYO) • • • • • ·SONJU • • • • · • • ~ ---- STANTON) •• 00 SVALSTAD.... ~ ---- (COEN) .... ••• ·WIEDER·· .... ~==== DISTRICT 5 /,· (RYCKOFF) ••••• MC INNIS •.•• ~ ---- (DIEDRICH) •••. RI LEY.. . • • • • .,,,,, ---- ROGERS •••••• ~ ___ _ DISTRICT 6 RIMA········~ ___ _ (DIEDRICH.) ····BATT! N • • • · • • ~ ___ _ (MC INNIS)·· • • ·STORE • • • • • • • ......, ___ _ DISTRICT 7 . LANGL~Y ••••• SALTARELLI •• ~ ---- PRYOR) •••••• .BURTON •••••• ~ __ -- DIEDRICH.)··· ·CLARK·······~ ___ _ (MC INNIS)···· ·DOSTAL······ ~ __ -- (GARTHE) ······E VANS······· ____ _ GLOCKNER···· 0... __ -- (PF:REZ) ·······JAC KM AN·····~ ___ _ Di"S'TRICT 11 -"""° ~ ~COEN •• • • • • • 0 DUKE • • • • • • • • ~ ---- COEN ........ GIBBS .... ··-~ ---- DIEDRICH) •• • -SCHMIT······~ ---- ISTRI CT 8 . 3/1 2 /75 JOINT BOARDS (DUNNE) • • • • • • WINN··· • • • •• ~ AMO······ ... ~ -- NUIJENS) • • • • ARBISO· • • • • • ~ __ DI EDRI CHi • • • BATT! N • • • · • • _L_ __ BLACKM)AN • • • MC KNEW . • • • • ~ __ PRYOR ······BURTON······~ COLLI~S) ····BYRNE······· ,,,,,, ==== L~O~S) • • • • • • CALLAHAN· • • • ~ __ E I G • • j · · · CHAPUT • • • • • • ~ __ DIEDRICH • · ·)CLAR K· • • • • • • ____£_ __ HOMRIGHAUSEN COX········· '-"""' CULVER······ V -- MEYER) • · • • • • DAVIS· • • • • · • V -- MC INNIS).··· DOSTAL ······ ~J5i/ COEN) • • • • · • · DUKE· • • • • • • • 0... __ GARTHE) y · · · EVA NS· • • • • • • ~ __ MAC KAIN • • • · FOX· • .. • • • • · • ~ __ EVANS)······ GARTHE······ • ..,, COEN) .... • .. GIBBS .. • .... ~ -- (NEVIL) •••••. lPEREl) •••••• THOM) ••.•••• FOX) ....... . RYCKOfF) ..•• (YOUNG) •..••. ----GLOCKNER·. · • (L.. __ GRAHAM ••.••• ~ __ JACK MAN ••••• ~ __ KAYWOOD .••.• ~ __ · MAC KAIN • • • • V' __ MC INNIS .. .. v NEV I L. • . • . • • V""' ·-- PERRY.. • • • • • V" -- (DIEDRICH) ••• RILEY ................. -- (WOOD) .•.•••• (LANGLEY) ••.• ! DIEDRICH) ••• SVALST (4.D) ••• LACAYO) .•••• MC INNIS) •••• STAN TON) ••• !PEREZ) •••••• COEN) ••.•••• ROOT) ••.••• ·, OTHERS , . RIMA •••••..• V"' == ROGERS •••••• ~ __ ROOT. . . . . . . . ......- SALTARELLI.. V -- SCHMIT •••••• ·~ SCOTT •.••••• ~a...-­ SONJU ••••••• ~-­ STORE ••..•.. ~ -- SVALSTAD •... ~ -- TEMPLE ••...• __iL:. -- WI EDER •••.•. /-- WObD •.•••.•• ~ -- HAR PER SYLVESTER LEWIS CLARKE TAYL OR BROWN NISSON EWING HOH ENER HOWARD HUNT KE ITH KENNEY LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVENS -- MEET I NG DATE March 12, 1975 DISTRICT 1 TIME 7 :3 0 p m DISTRICTS 1 ,2,3,5,6 ,7 & n JOINT BOARDS DIEDRICH ····BATTIN······ V ___ _ GARTHE) ······EVANS······· ---1.:::::::::: ---- RIMA·····... V ___ _ (LANGLEY) • • • • ·SAL TAR ELLI • • ~ ---- DISTRICT 2 ~i:WI NG) ••• •••• CHAPUT······~ ___ _ QNS). ······CALLAHAN····~ ___ _ DIEDRICH)···· CLARK·······~ ___ _ EVANS)······· GARTHE • • • • • • -1.L ___ _ NEVI~)······· GRAHAM······~--__ THOM)········ KAYWOOD·····~ ___ _ FOX) •• •••••• ·MAC KAIN • • • · ~--__ PERRY·······~ !SVALSTAD) ····SCOTT······· v----- PEREZ)······· TEMPLE······~====== DUNNE)· • • • ···WINN··· • • • • • ./ ROOT) ••• ·····WOOD········ .i/7 ==== == DISTRICT 3 (MAC KAIN). • • • ·FOX· • • • • • • • • ~--__ AMO · · · • • · · · .. -1,,,L_ ! NU I JENS) • • • • ·A RB I S 0 • • · • · · v ---- BLACKMAN) ···MC KNEW • • • _L ---- COLLI NS) • • · • ·BYRNE· • • • • • • ~ ---- HOMRl GHAUSEN) COX········· ~ == == CULVER······ lMEYER) ·······DAVIS·······~====== EVANS) ·······GARTHE·· ····~ TH OM) • • • • • · • ·KAYWOOD • • · • • v ---- YO UNG) • • • • • ··NEVIL·· • · • • • ~ ---- 1 -'OD) ········ROOT········ _L ---- 'M'EDRI CH) ····SCHMIT······ 0........----- LACAYO) • • • • • ·SONJU • • • • · • • ~ ---- STANTON) • • • ·SVALSTAD • • · • JJ:!!L ---- COEN) • • • • • • ··WI EDER·· • • • • ~ ==== == DISTRICT 5 RYCKOFF •••.• MC INNIS • • • • ~ ___ ,_: _ DIEDRICH) •••. RILEY....... ___ _ ROGERS • • • . • • (]../ ___ _ DISTRICT 6 RIMA········ v ___ _ (DIEDRICH)··· ·BATTIN······~ ___ _ (MC INNIS)···· ·STORE·······~--___ _ DISTRICT 7 LANGL[:Y ••.•• SALTARELLI •• V __ _ PRYOR) •.••••. BURTON •••••• --v7' ___ _ DIEDRICK) • • • ·CLARK • • • • • • • V (MC INNIS)···· ·DO STAL······ :;:;::-== ~ (GARTHE) ······EVANS······· · GLOCKNER · • · • CL-: ---- (PEREZ) • · • · • · ·JACKMAN • • • • • /7" == == Dl"STRICT 11 lCOEN • • • • • • • ·DUKE • • • • • • • • ~-- CO E N • •• • • · • .GIBBS • • • • • •• _JL_ __ -- DIEDRICH) • • • .SCHMIT • • • • • • ---0...L----- DISTRICT 8 \ / M\TCHELL •• ·~ _ -(~OHNSOtD • • • • ·HO ~M • • • • ·/_ :-""""~ (o)~t cH) ••• ·RIL EY.~ •••. ·-- - 3/1 2 /75 (DUNNE) • · • • • • WINN·· • • • ••• ~ __ AMO· · · · · · . • . V' NUI JENS) • • • • ARBI SO· • •• . . V -- DI EDRl CH)··· BATTIN······ -V--- BLACKMAN)··· MC KNEW _ • · • • ~ -- PRYOR) • • • • • • BURTON· · • • · • 1/ -- COLLI ~s) • _. · · BYRNE· • · • • • • v == LYONS • • • • • • CALLAHAN· • · • ~ EWING • • • • • • CHAPUT· · • .•• _iL_ -- DIEDRICH)··· CLARK······· v -- HOMRI GHAUSEN) COX········· ~ -- CULVER······ \/"" R4v4 MEYER) • · • • • · DAVIS· • • · · · • ---V '7 ' f " MC IN.NIS). • • • DOSTAL······ v 'l}_-!J J:5 COEN) ••. • • • • DUKE· • • • • · · • OJ GARTHE) · • • • • EVANS· • • • • • • ~ -- MAC KAIN). • • · FOX· • · • • • · · • ~ -- EVANS) • • • • • • GARTHE · • · •• • -V -- COEN) .. ·•••• GIBBS··· .... ---V--- GLOCKNER· ••• CV--- (NEVIL) ••.••. GRAHAM ••••.• \_.../ == Ip EREl) •••••• JACKMAN. • . . • v THOM) ••..••• KAYWOOD ..••• t.,/". == FOX) •.•..••• MAC KAIN • • • • v RYCKOfF) •••• MC INNIS ..•• v -- YOUNG) • . • • • • NEVIL. • . • . • • v -- PERRY ••••.•• __iL__ -- ( D I ED R I CH ) • • • R I LEY • . . • . • • ___i_L_ -- RI MA •...•.•• -V--- (wooD) ••..••• (LANGLEY) .•.• ! DIEDRICH) ••• SV ALSTfl,D) •.• LACAYO) .•••• MC INNIS) •••• STANTON) ••• 1 PEREZ) •••••• COEN) ••.•••• ROOT) ••..•• -. OTHERS ROGERS . • • • • • ---;:;---- ~~~~ ARELL i:: =?' == SCHMIT ••.••• -c;J4!.J SCOTT ••••••• -~ -- SONJ U • • • • • • • 7.(/)..,/ -- STORE. • • • • • • c-/ -- SVALSTAD •. ._. ~ -- TEMPLE.. . • • • i.----- WI EDER...... L/ -- WObD . . . • • • • • _LL._ == HARPER '· SYLVESTER LEWIS CLA RK E TAYLOR BROWN NISSON EWING HOHENER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVENS -. March 1 2 , 1975 3b) Supv. Battin ann o u nced tha t he h ad a n ew membe r on hi s staff who had previously served on the Board and some of the committees here -- Joseph Hyde . Sai d he will be Batti n 's liaison with some of the city representatives. (5) Report of the Joint Chairman Wi n n advised t hat he and Mr. Harper had b een authorized at the last meeting to go to Washington in connection with PL 92 -500 and the 1972 Amendments to the Water Pol l ution Contro l Act, but this has been postponed to the middle of Apri l . Will meet wi th AMSA and at a seminar of the Water Poll ution Control Federation. Al so reported that a letter was sent to Senator Tunney and various ot h er representati ves regarding permitt ing use of ad valorem taxes as one of the sources for tax revenue. (6) Report of the Genera l Manage r Mr. Harper reported further on the l etter to Senator Tunney. Said it appeared that this was the ·only amendment of three that EPA chose to approach Congress with this year . Said one week ago Senator Stevenson and Muskie got t ogether and the people in attendance did not have the proper answers to give Senator Muskie as reasons why the ad valorem ta x is or can be a proper revenue source fo r agencies such as ourselves . Sai d we have to go back and do a good job on appealing now. Senator 's concern is that after Federal money is spent, whether the agency will have sufficient funds on an annual basis to maintain the facilities properly and be able to repay them when the time comes. Our agency can demonstrate that over the years we have had long range plans and have made our commitments to maintain the property . Regarding the grant funds being released ($9 billion from EPA) there is a push by Governor Brown 's office to get some of these projects going. SWRCB i s starting to push out the projects . They have $1 .6 billion for construction of water polluti on control facilities. These funds will be allocated by September of 1977 . That means the project has to be designed ang environmental assessment done . Our Districts submitted a project report to State one year ago this month. Anticipated the construction would take 8 years to do the work. High point as far as cash flow is about the mi ddle of the period ($51 million during one month). We have received the grant offer on JPL process -- $3~ million to perfect this system to prove or disprove it aid prepare a facilities plan. Have to come up with a 25 year master plan . In addition, we are going to have to prepare another environmental impact statement that should have been done by EPA but they don 't have the staff so they are entering into an agreement for us to do it . They will pay for 87~% of it. Wi l l rave to be done within next 18 months. If we wait 18 months to come to some of the decisions, there will not be enough time to get plans and specs done to get in on $1 .6 billion in grants . Suggested that Boards meet sometime later thi s month, at which time we will outline the program step by step which we feel we would l ike to do. On supplemental agenda this meeting have asked for authorization to proceed with some of .the work that is being required in the development area that i s not refundable. Said another significant factor is that if it appears that an agency finds that they are hung up because of the Coastal Commission, Fish & Game ,Ai r Quality Board , etc. that puts a hold on the project ·· without giving an answer, we have been told that if we get in touch with Tom Quinn's office at State Board, they will go direct l y t o agency and find out what th e probl em is. Ray Lewi s then gave s lide present at ion on Pl-16 project and other construction projects in the Districts. (7) Report of the General Counsel Nisson reported re law s uit on P2-2 0 , that t hrou gh the e ff orts of Ray Le wis and cooperation of contractor and bonding company, have avoided a lawsuit. Di stric t will be fini shing the job. Bonding company will come up with $20,00 0 to fini sh the job. Probably will be ready to accept by April. Said a lot of credit goes to Ray Le wis and the staff on this. Advised he spent considerab l e amount of time on wastewater ordinance . Revised ordinance sent out to Directors. Ther e is a provision for ad valorem taxes to t ake care of o rdinanc e service. If law passes, will have to take care of that in the future. Are working through CASA group to get amendment to San itation Districts Act whereby ordinances will carry some bite in them. Now $100 fin e and 30 d ays in jail. Now is the time to get that amended and push for legislation so will be effective when amended. Reported that AFSCME are seeking a vote to see if they can represent the emp l oyees. We told them we had a contract and i t was up in November and would t h en consider th~J.lJ-right to vote . (Contract Bar Doctrine Labor Law) Have sued for~~of Mandate. Nisson advised that in accordance with Board's previous a u thorization, have ~mployed Musick , Peeler & Garrett to represent the Districts , particularly by Larry A. Cu rtis in Los Angeles. The ir rates are $50 -70 per hour. Larry Curtis is $60/hour,wh o is the one who will· be doing the work. Hearingva.s set for March 18th and Curtis suggested that we require them to include the OCEA as a necessary party and Nisson concurred . Hearing now set for 2nd or 7th of Ap ril wit h probability it will be extended beyond that time . Our position is that the legi slature is working on new l egislation which will probably be con trolli ng in this area ao any delay will not be any disadvantage to the Districts. Shoul d we los e when it is finally heard , a n y appeal we might take will stay the matter u ntil November wh ich is when our c urrent agreement expires . Worked on other routine matters of business. (9) Report of Special Selection Co mmitt ee for Aud it Serv ices Root asked for a two-week continuance of this item. Will report at adjourned meeting. Regarding adjourned joint meetin g, Winn suggested the Boards meet on March 26 but said he understood there was a confl ict with Inter- governmental Coordinating Council at 7 :30 . Moved the time to 5 :30 on th e 26th. -2 - (10) Items de l eted from CONSENT CALENDAR (c) Kaywood questioned amount of payment for agreement and whether this was precendent setting . Was advised the correct amount is $1 25 and Nisson stated that it is our property and we have the right to lease it . Didn 't believe this was precendent setting . Advised that lease provides for paving of right of way and if we have to tear it up, it is at no cost to the Districts. Users are subject to 90 -day notice. Otherwise we would get no revenue and wou1d have a maintenance problem. Ray Lewis exp l ained method o~. arriving at lease amount . Svalstad commented that he figured it should be a little higher . He figured $3 per sq . ft. plus $800 per year but with paving would come pretty close to that. Item lO(c) was then moved, seconded and carried. (e) Kaywood questioned the change order and asked how we can avoid these kinds of surprises .and who is responsible for the records. REL explained that Miller Street was deeded to city and somewhere along the way the records were lost. We run across this frequently with abandoned lines or lost records, etc. County has grown so rapidl y and utilities records not up to date. Nisson added that legislature and the recent Governor just passed a law which provides that in the event of such an unknown utility wh i ch arises during construction, the public agency is liable effective Jan~ary 1st of 7th of this year. Scott questioned what was done to cost almost $10,000 . Ray explained and Scott indicated he understood why then. Item lO(e) was then moved , seconded and carried~ (1 2) Uniform Connection and Use Ordinance FAH advised that one of the things that we are talking to the industrial community about on this ordinance is the charges that will be established by the Boards by resolution on an annual basis. Reviewed what numbers are going to be. For M & O, will be charging $45 per MG, $5 per thousand pounds of BOD, and $10 on suspended solids. Large water dischargers will have to evaluate whether it is less expensive for them to put in equipment a.nd recycle their water · as much as they can. For every ton of BOD will be charged $10 and for suspended solids $20 per ton. For one paper company service this past year cost them $43,000. If they continue to operate as in the past, that price will go to $1 55,000. Root asked if they were going to be negotiating .directly with staff or does the .city enter into this. Was answered that· they will operate directly through our Industrial Waste -Department. $65 per MG on an average for 0 & M but could go up as high as $305 . Numbers could vary from $100 to $452. Root added that this was very vital as far as industry was concerned . FAH advi~ed that we have been working very closely with LA County and City and hope to be in line with them . Nisson added that one other feature of thie wastewater ordinanc e which differs from existing one is that .in the existing one we had a provision that we would not amend the ordinance 'until we notified -3- (38) everyone who had a permit . That is going to be eliminated . Is unnecessary and an unreal burden to notify everybody who had a permit. This proposed ordinance provides that anyone who is interested and registers to receive notice, will get one. Cities will be n otified . PUBLIC HEARING re Annexation No. 8 to District No . 2 Opened public hearing at ~:37 p.m . JWS read summary of actions No written nor oral comments. Closed hearing at 8 :43 p .m. Resolution ordering annexation was moved, seconded and carried. (15) Other Business: Norma Gibbs called a meeting of the Special Selection Committee for Legal Counsel after the Board meeting that night . (16) Annexation policy and fee schedul e JWS advised that the Boards had asked the staff to summarize and send out additional information on annexation policy and fee schedule . Districts 1 and 6 not included because they do not have any annexable territory . Explained each District's annexation policy and fees . Advised that the staff has submitted summaries of each District's present policy including what the net worth acreage fee would be . Also included draft resolution that each Board could consider adopting . To develop a uniform policy would assist in administration of staff . Net equity acreage basis seems to be a fair me thod of charging the area that annexes. Would pay into fixed assets already in the ground. FAH added that if we are going to have uniform policy, would have different fees but would be calculated the same way. It was then moved to adopt resolution by Districts 2 & 7 . Seconded for 2 & 7. Moved and seconded for District 3. Chaput stated that the net worth is not near what the facilities have cost the District for residences . Not a high enough figure . Have discussed this before. Not sure new Directors know what they are voting on. Net worth is what we pay times number of years and hav e had a lot of inflati on . Mr . Harper said that as far as densities are concerned, particularly in Districts 2,3,5 & 7, are p icked up with connection charge of some $200 per unit . Another point is that net worth figure we are using includes grant monies that will be given to us by State and Federal government . May not offset all inflation but does push up the number. Very difficult figure to kee p upgrading . We aren 't set up to periodically update every year Took a verbal vote by district . Resolution passed in Distric ts 2 , 3 and 7. -4- (39) Santa Ana River Interceptor, 2-14-3 Ray Lewis gave report on 2 -14 -3 . Said it was the staff's recommendati o n that they be instructed to have plans and specs completed and forwarded to the Stat e for their review and subsequent grant funding . It was moved, seconded and carried t o do so . Chaput then ask ed if this was for plans and specs wi t h the s i ze of pipe c o ming l a ter. REL said recommendation is for design concept . Full pipe sizing (?) Chaput complained that they never got to discuss this. Scott added that he would like to discuss this further too if Dale thinks they should. MacKain stated that it had been discussed . FAH asked REL if having the engineer proceed with the design , could the matter of the pipe size b e deferred t o the me eting on the 26th . Ray answered yes, was possible. Nisson advised that there must b e a motion for reconsideration because thi s was already approved . Wo uld have to recons ider t o change their action . No one moved t6 reconsider . -5- • ... COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE C_OUNTY, CALIFORNIA This March 12, 1975, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' office at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California, being the time and place for the regular joint meeting of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange· County, California, and there not being a quorum of said Board present, the me etin g of District No. 11 was there upon adjourned by the Sec·retary to March 26, ·1975 , at 5:30 p .rn . STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) ss. , . COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify ·that the above and foregoing .to be full, true and correct ~6py of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 12thday of March, 1 975 . IN WITN ESS WHEREOF, I day of Marc h, 1 975 . I""< -... _____ _ r- this 1 2th COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE CO~TY 2 CALIFORNIA DISTRICT NO. 1 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 2 Directors present: Directors absent: DIS'~l.1RICT NO. 3 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 5 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 6 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 7 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 11 Directors present: Directors absent: MINUTES OF THl~REGULAR MEETING March 12, 1975 -7:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California ROLL CALL Robert Battin (Chairman), Vernon Evans, Kerm Rima, and Donald Saltarelli None Dale Chaput (Chairman), Michael Callahan, Ralph Clark, John Garthe, Beth Graham, Miriam Kaywood, Leonard MacKain, Bob Perry, George Scott, Joe Temple, Donald Winn, and Frances Wood None Donald Fox (Chairman), Lowell Amo, Gilbert Arbiso, Jr., Thomas McKnew, Edward Byrne, Phillip Cox, Norman Culver, Jesse Davis, John Garthe, Miriam Kaywood, Robert Nevil, Robert Root, Sonia Sonju, Bernie Svalstad, and Harriett Wieder Laurence Schmit Don Mcinnis (Chairman) and Thomas Riley Howard Rogers Kerm Rima (Chairman),. Robert Battin, and John Store None Donald Saltarelli (Chairman), John Burton, Ralph Clark, Milan Dostal, Vernon Evans, and James Jackman Francis Glockner Norma Gibbs Henry Duke (Chairman) and Laurence Schmit 3/12/75 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary, Ray Lewis, William Clarke, John Thomas, Bruce Taylor, and Rita Brown '-" Director Carolyn Ewing, C. Arthur Nissen, General Counsel, Conrad Hohener, Harvey Hunt, Milo Keith, Gail Lynch, Donald Martinson, Donald Stevens, and Bill Hartge A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held at 7:30 p.m. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invoca- tion, the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7. DISTRICT 11 Adjournment for lack of quorum * * * * * * * * * * There not being a quorum present at the time and place for the regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. to March 26, 11, the Secretary thereupon adjourned.said Board 1975, at 5:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 2 ·& 3 Excerpt re Board appointments rece~_ved and f'iled Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the minute excerpt from the City of Fountain Valley be received and ordered filed, and that the following representatives be seated as members of the Boards: DISTRICT 1 District 2 3 Approval of minutes Active George B. Scott Bernie Svalstad Alternate Bernie Svalstad Roger Stanton Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held February 19, 1975, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held February 19, 1975, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held February 19, 1975, be approved as mailed. -2- 3/12/75 DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held February 19, 1975, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held February 19, 1975, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held February 19, 1975, be approved as mailed. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 & 7 Report of the Joint Chairman The Joint Chairman announced that the March meeting of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agency members with Congressional representa- tives in Washington, D.C. regarding proposed amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act had been rescheduled for mid-April. He and the General Manager will attend on behalf of the Districts as previously authorized by the Boards. Chairman Winn also reported that he was sending a letter to Senator Tunney urging his support of proposed amendments to the 1972 Federal Water Pollution Control Act allowing use of local ad valorem taxes as one of several sources of revenue for user charge systems and would enclose a copy of the resolution adopted by the Boards in this regard. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 & 7 Report of the General Manager The General Manager reported further on proposed amendments to the Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (PL 92-500). Of the 25 items originally considered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for recommendation to Congress, which had subsequently been narrowed to three, it now appears as if the ad valorem tax matter is the only one that EPA will support this year, and even that item is receiving considerable opposition. Mr. Harper observed that with the recent Supreme Court-ordered release of $9 billion in wastewater construction grant funds previously impounded by Presidential Order, there was now a push by the Governor's office to get clean water projects in California off dead center. The State now has $1.6 billion for construction of water pollution control facilities in California which must be allocated by September, 1977. Our Districts submitted a Project Report to meet new requirements in March, 1974, which the State Water Resources Control Board has not yet acted on, setting forth a plan to meet the new regulations at an estimated cost of $275 million during the next eight years. The State did, however, approve a $3.5 million grant for development of a treatment plant facilities plan and environmental impact statement -3- 3/12/75 including the 1 MGD Jet Propulsion Laboratory reactivated carbon wastewater treatment pilot plant. The Districts are under extremely tight time constraints in order to complete necessary planning and design work in time to assure receipt of grant fund '-" commitments by the deadline. The General Manager therefore recommended that the Boards hold an adjourned meeting later in March, at which time the entire program could be outlined for consideration by the Directors. The Districts' Chief Engineer then gave a slide presentation on the progress of the 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facility at Reclamation Plant No. 1, presently under construction. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 & 7 Report of the General Counsel The General Counsel reported the Districts had removed Mel Gorham Electric Company, contractor for Power Reliability Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-20, project. The bonding the job wh~ch will be because of their inability to complete the company will assume the cost of finishing completed by Districts' staff. Mr. Nisson commented on the proposed new Uniform Industrial Waste Ordinance and noted that his suggested changes have been incorporated into the draft which was mailed to Directors. The General Counsel reported that the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees is suing the Districts for a Write of Mandate in connection with their request for recognition as the representative of Districts' employees. In accordance with standing Board authorization, the Counsel has engaged the firm of Musick, Peeler & Garrett to represent the Districts in the suit which will be heard the first week in April. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 & 7 Report of Special Selection Committee for Audit Services The Joint Chairman reported that the Special Selection Committee for Audit Services will present a recommendation for the Boards' consideration at the adjourned meeting to be held later in March. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 & 7 Receive and file comments re draft Uniform Connection and Use Ordinance, and refer to staff and General Counsel Use Ordinance, be received, and General Counsel. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the comments of Kerr Glass Manufacturing Corporation dated February 13, 1975, in connection with the Districts' tentative draft of revised Uniform Connection and ordered filed, and referred to staff -4- DISTRICTS 1 2,3,5,6 & 7 Receive, fife, and reject amended claim of Kelly Timothy Kellas re damage or injury involving Districts' vehicle 3/12/75 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the amended claim dated February 27, 1975, of Kelly Timothy Kellas filed by Charles A. Price, Attorney for Claimant, for alleged damage or injury incurred in an accident involving a District-owned vehicle, be received, ordered filed, and rejected, as recommended by the General Counsel. Receive and file staff progress report on Treatment Plant Construction projects and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 & 7 Approving License to Occupy Right of Way with Jack R. Fenton and Wayne R. Peterson Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff progress report dated March 6, 1975, on Treatment Plant Construction Projects, be received Following a brief discussion regarding the proposed License to Occupy Right of Way with Jack R. Fenton, et al., and the fee therefor, during which the General Counsel advised that in his opinion the proposed action would not be precedent setting, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-37, approving License to Occupy Right of Way with Jack R. Fenton and Wayne R. Peterson, a Partnership, and authorizing District No. 1 to execute said license, in form approved by the General Counsel. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minuteso DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 & 7 Take under advisement tentative draft of revised Uniform Connection and Use Ordinance and authorizing informal hearings The General Manager reviewed the draft revised Uniform Connection and Use Ordinance dated March, 1975, and outlined anticipated unit costs to industry under the proposed ordinance. State and Federal regulations require recovery of all Districts' costs which will be incorporated into a revenue program. Anticipated costs to industrial dischargers, which are based upon three parameters-- flow, suspended solids, and biological oxygen demand (BOD), may increase substantially for certain firms, in which case each discharger will have to analyze his mode of operation to determine the economics of recycling wastewater within the facility rather than discharging it to the Districts' system. Mr. Harper advised that our Districts have been working closely with Los Angeles County Sanitation District and the City of Los Angeles toward the goal of assuring that no substantial cost differentials will accrue to industries in the two counties as a result of their respective regulations. -5- 3/12/75 The General Counsel reported that it should be noted that the provision for notifying all permittees of any proposed change to the ordinance has been omitted. He felt that this requirement was an unnecessary burden.on the District, and the new ordinance ~ requires that any persons who wish to receive notification to so request in writing to the respective District. Following a brief discussion, it was then moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the tentative draft of revised Uniform Connection and Use Ordinance, dated March, 1975, be received, ordered filed, and taken under advisement; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the staff be authorized to circulate the proposed ordinance and to schedule and conduct informal hearings on said ordinance. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 & 7 Certification of the General Manager re bills received and ordered filed Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the certification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment, be received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 & 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving That the District's Joint Operating ~ Fund check registers and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund accounts payable check registers be approved for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay: Joint Operating Capital Outlay Revolving $ 71,583.59 1,438,986.62 $1,510,570.21 in accordance with the claims listed on pages "I-1" through "I-4", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Director Dostal requested that his abstention from voting on Warrant No. 25254 be made a matter of record. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 & 7 Following a brief staff report, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: Authorizing staff to proceed with additional JPL process development work That the Districts' staff be authorized to proceed with any additional process development work on the JPL reactivated carbon process in an amount not to exceed $100,000, pursuant to the conditions of the State and Federal Step 1 Grant authorization to proceed with construc- tion and operation of a 1 MGD reactivated carbon wastewater treatment process facility. -6- DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 7 Consideration of annexation policy and fee schedule policy and fee schedules, taken: DISTRICT 2 3/12/75 Following a staff review of the current annexation policies of the several Districts, the respective Boards entered into a brief discussion concerning the proposed changes in whereupon the following actions were Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Adoption of annexation policy and fee schedule That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-42-2 establishing fees and procedures concerning annexations of territory to the District. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Adoption of annexation policy and fee schedule That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-43-3 establishing . fees and procedures concerning annexations of territory to the District. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Adoption of annexation policy and fee schedule That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-44-7 establishing fees and procedures concerning annexations of territory to the District. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Public hearing re proposed Annexation No. 8 -Tract No. 4980 hearing open at 8:30 p.m. The Chairman stated that this was the time and place fixed for a public hearing for proposed Annexation No. 8 (Tract No. 4980) to County Sanitation District No. 2 and declared the The Secretary reviewed the proceedings to date concerning the proposed annexation as follows: PURPOSE OF ANNEXATION The purpose of the annexation is to provide public sanitary sewer service for approximately 8 acres of territory proposed to be annexed in the vicinity of Mallard St~eet and Collins Avenue in the City of Orange. PURPOSE OF HEARING Because the territory proposed to be annexed is presently inhabited, it is necessary to hold this public hearing to determine if there is a majority protest against annexation. This is a result of the developer of the territory failing to annex the area to the District prior to development when said property was annexed to the City of Orange. -7- 3/12/75 If less than 25% of the number of landowners within territory owning not more than 25% of the assessed valuation of land therein, and less than 25% of the voting power of voters entitled to vote as a result of residing in or owning property within the territory, protest, then following the hearing, the Board may order annexation of the territory. If more than 25% but less than 50% of the number of landowners within the territory, or more than 25% but less than 50% of the voting power protest, then an election must be held. If more than 50% of the assessed valuation or more than 50% of the voting power protest, then the annexation must be abandoned. ASSESSED VALUATION AND VOTING POWER: Assessed valuation of the territory has been determined to be $394,070. Number of voters in the territory has been determined to be 5-8. IF ANNEXATION FAILS: In the event annexation fails, the Board of Directors on October 10, 1973, declared their intent to levy a sewer service charge in the amount of $10 or more per residential unit per month. TO DATE, THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS HAVE TAKEN PLACE: On October 10, 1973, the Board of Directors took the following actions: Adopted Resolution No. 73-170-2, declaring a special exception for Tract No. 4980 and waived District connection fees therefor; Denied request of the City of Orange for waiver of annexation fees on Tract No. 4980; Adopted Resolution No. 73-149-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex the territory and setting fees therefor at one-half the established amount, pursuant to the declaration of a special exception for said annexation; Declared intent to levy a sewer service charge in the amount of $10 per unit per month if annexation is not completed. -8- 3/12/75 On April 24, 1974, the Local Agency Formation Commission adopted Resolution No. 74-39, declaring its findings regarding the proposed annexation, approving said annexation, and directing County Sanitation District No. 2 to proceed with the annexation. (Proceedings have been held in abeyance pendine final corrections to the map and legal description by the proponent.) On February 19, 1975, the Board of Directors adopted Resolution No. 75-20-2, fixing March 12, 1975, at 8:30 p.m. as the date and time of hearing on proposed Annexation No. 8 -Tract No. 4980, and establishing procedures for filing of written protest. Notice of the hearing has been continuously posted on the Districts' bulletin board since February 20, 1975. On February 20, documents were mailed to owners of record within the territory proposed to be annexed, affected cities and special districts, District No. 2 Directors, and other interested parties, containing the following information: A letter of explanation; A brochure explaining the District's function; An official notice of the public hearing, including maps indicating the area to be annexed and a copy of the resolution fixing the hearing Legal notice of the hearing was published in the Santa Ana Register on February 26 and March 5, 1975. To date, no written protests have been filed with the Secretary. The Chairman then asked if anyone in the audience wished to be heard or file an oral protest concerning the proposed annexation. There being no oral comments or protests, the Chai·rman then declared the public hearing closed at 8:43 p.m. DISTRICT 2 Following the public hearing, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: Ordering annexation of territory to the District (Annexation No. 8) That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-41-2, ordering annexation of approximately 7.979 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Mallard Street and Collins Avenue (Annexation No. 8 -Tract No. 4980 to County Sanitation District No. 2). Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: DISTRICT 1 Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors be adjourned to 5:30 p.m., Wednesday, March 26, 1975. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m~, March 12, 1975. -9- 3/12/75 DISTRICT 3 Receive and file staff EE.Ogress reports re Contracts Nos. 3-18, 3-18, and 3-20-1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff progress reports dated March 6, 1975, on construction of the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18; the Imperial Relief Interceptor, Reaches 22 & 23, Contract No. 3-19; and the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 & 6, Contract No. 3-20-1, be received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of warrants That the District's Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund warrant book be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $322,264.80, in accordance with the warrants listed on Page "II", attached hereto and made a part of these minuteso DISTRICT 3 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to 5:30 p.m., Wednesday, March 26, 1975. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:56 p.m., March 12, 1975. DISTRICT 5 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 5:30 p.m., Wednesday, March 26, 1975. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:56 p.m., March 12, 1975. DISTRICT 6 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to 5:30 p.m., Wednesday, March 26, 1975. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:57 p.m., March 12, 1975. DISTRICT 7 Authorizing initiation of proceedings re Annexation No. 46 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 75-38-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 62.64 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the northeast corner of Orange Park Acres and Chapman Avenue (Proposed Annexation No. 46 -Tracts Nos. 8799 and 8827 to County Sanitation District No. 7). Certified copy of this resolution is attac~ed hereto and made a part of these minutes. -10- DISTRICT 7 Approving plans and specifications for Contract No. 7-6-7 for Tustin-Orange Trunk Contract No. 7-6-7, and copy of this resolution minuteso DISTRICT 7 Receive and file staff progress report re Contract No. 7-6-6 3/12/75 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 75-39-7, approving plans and specifications Sewer, Reach 11 and a Portion of Reach 12, authorizing advertising for bids. Certified is attached hereto and made a part of these Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff progress report dated March 6, 1975, on construction of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 10, Contract No. 7-6-6, be received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of warrants That the District's Operating Fund and Facilities Revolving Fund warrant books be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay: Operating Fund Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund $ 37.11 5,631.00 $5,668.11 in accordance with the warrants listed on Page "III", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 5:30 p.m., Wednesday, March 26, 1975. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:57 p.m., March 12, 1975. DISTRICT 2 Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 2-18 Following a brief discussion regarding the problem of undisclosed utilities encountered in construction projects, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Carbon Canyon Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-18, authorizing an addition of $9,955.03 for extra work due to undisclosed utilities and granting an extension of time of 6 calendar days for completion of said work, to the contract with s. S. Zarubica, be approved. Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -11- 3/12/75 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Accepting proposal of Clifford A. Forkert for preparation of rieht of way documents That the proposal submitted by Clifford A. Forkert, Civil Engineer, dated March 4, 1975, for preparation of right of way document maps and records be received, ordered filed, and accepted; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be authorized to direct the engineer to prepare said documents, on a per diem fee basis, for a maximum amount not to exceed $7,000.00, in accordance with the following schedule of fees: RATE Hour Day (1) 40 hours per week, 8 hours per day, operating from Headquarters: a. Field Inspector. . . . . . . Plus mileage. b. Furnishing Field Superviscr. . . . . c. Furnishing Two-Man Survey Party. . . . d. Furnishing Three-Man Survey Party. e. Furnishing Four-Man Survey Party Travel time after 8-hour work day is to be charged at the above rates - e.g., straight time. (2) AUTHORIZED OVERTIME: . a. Time worked in excess of 8 hours per day (excluding travel time) and for work performed on Saturday (maximum 11 hours), multiply above rates by 1. 3. . .$18.45 . .$20.75 . .$41.25 . .$60.00 . .$74.00 b. For work performed on Sunday (maximum 11 hours), multiply above rates by 1.6. (3) PER DIEM: a. When job location requires men to work away from Headquarters -Board and room furnished: Add $13.00 per day, per man. $147.60 $166.00 $330.00 $480.00 $592 .. 00 (4) SPECIAL SURVEYING EQUIPMENT -Addition to crew rates: 1. Electronic Measuring Equipment -Long Range: Plus $11 hr'-' 2. Electronic Measuring Equipment -Short Range: Plus $3 hr. -12- DISTRICT 2 Receive and file staff progress reports re Contracts Nos. 2-15, 2-17-2, and 2-18 3/12/75 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff progress reports dated March 6, 1975, on construction of the Yorba Linda Pump Station, Contract No. 2-15; the Carbon Canyon -Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer, Reach 2, from Carbon Canyon Channel to Kraemer Boulevard, Contract No. 2-17-2; and the Carbon Canyon Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-18, be received and ordered. filed. DISTRICT 2 Approving Design Criteria and Capacity for Reach III of the Santa Ana River Interceptor The Chief Engineer briefly reviewed the staff report on the Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reach III, Contract No. 2-14-3, and summarized the design criteria and capacities previously recommended for said project based upon an E-0 population forecast with the sewer to flow at 0.65 depth of internal pipe diameter. Mr. Lewis recommended that the Board consider authorizing engineers to proceed with design of said project in accordance with the recommendation in order that plans and specifications may be filed with the State and Federal agencies pursuant to grant funding stipulations. Following a brief discussion by the Board, it was then moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff be authorized to direct the engineers to proceed with design of Reach III of the Santa Ana River Interceptor in accordance with the staff's recommended design criteria and capacities dated September 26, 1974. The Board then entered into a general discussion regarding the possibility of reconsidering the capacity of the interceptor, whereupon the General Counsel advised that any motion for reconsideration must come from a Director that voted in favor of the original action. Thereafter, no further motions were forthcoming from the floor. · DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of warrants That the District's Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund wrarant book be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $716,450.56, in accordance with the warrants listed on Page "II", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation Dj~r;r t No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting adjourned at 9:07 p.m., March 12, 19750 ./kN tJl-·y of Directors, ~Sa~i ion Districts Nos. 1, , 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 -13- • WARRANT NO. ~243 25244 25245 25246 25247 25248 25249 25250 25251 25252 . 25253 25254 25255 25256 25257 25258 25259 25260 25261 25262 25263 25264 25265 25266 ~5267 ~268 25269 25270 25271 25272 25273 25274 25275 25276 ' 25277 25278 25279 25280 25281 25282 25283 25284 25285 25286 25287 25288 25289 25290 25291 25292 -293 ~294 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Alex Fish Company, Ecological Research $ All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings, Couplings & Belts Alpine Aromatics, Inc., Odor Control Aljac Supply Co., Pipe Supplies American Backflow Co., Valve Parts American Soil Company, Lateral Repair Amoco Reinforced Plastics Co., Freight City of Anaheim, Power The Anchor Packing Co., Gaskets AMSA, Conference Registra~ion Bancroft-Whitney Co., Government Codes Banning Battery Company, Batteries Barnes & Delaney, Conveyor Repair Bearing Specialty Company, Bearings Bell Pipe & Supply Company, Controls & Switches Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair Don Bogart, Employee Mileage Broadlicks Art Supply, Drafting Supplies CS Company, Valves & Freight Cal's Cameras, Photo Supplies & Processing Coast Insurance Agency, Insurance Premium Coast Towing, Towing Compressor Service, Compressor Parts Consolidated Electrical Distbrs., Electrical Supplies Constructor's Supply Co., Hardware Costa Mesa County Water District, Water Crest Leasing, Vehicle Lease Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplies Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies N. A. D'Arcy Company, Freight c. R. Davis Supply Co., Hardware Deaver Manufacturing Co., Equipment Repair John M. Deck Co., Equipment Parts De Guelle & Sons Glass Co., Glass Department of General Services, Technical Manuals Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling Dodge Truck, Inc., Truck Parts Ida L. Duesberg, Employee Mileage Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies & Printing Ecco Equipment Corp., Equipment Rental Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring Enterprise Printing Company, Cover Stock Fischer & Porter Company, Pump Parts & Strip Charts William Fox, Employee Mileage GAF Corporation, Copier Repair Gasket Manufacturing Co., Inc., Gaskets General Electric Supply, Electric Supplies General Installation Co., Water Heater Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine Contract 1-1-75 General Teiephone Company of Calif. Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage AMOUNT 159.00 423.59 1,060.00 178.61 251.77 675.00 141.40 56.64 71.02 100.00 45.82 156.62 193.33 ~48.24 230.44 38.00 21.00 17.74 531.35 315.98 59.00 35.00 72.95 1,252.72 193.79 6.oo 147.28 80.00 25.38 529.05 6.06 81.41 95.40 63.44 181.99 12.72 428.25 82.19 7.80 135.12 820.00 3,000.00 69.91 2,438.58 23.70 214.67 158.18 533.30 64.91 6,326.30 3,111.77 33.90 AGENDA ITEM # 30 L-1 DISTRICT'l'l WARRANT NO. 25295 25296 25297 25298 25299 25300 25301 25302 25303 25304 25305 25306 25307 25308 25309 25310 25311 25312 25313 25314 25315 25316 25317 25318 25319 25320 25321 25322 25323 25324 25325 25326 25327 25328 25329 25330 25331 25332 25333 25334 25335 25336 25337 25338 25339 25340 2531.t 1 25342 25343 25344 25345 25346 25347 25348 25349 IN FAVOR OF Graybar Electric Co., ·Electric Supplies $ Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Parts Hadley's Printing, Printing George T. Hall Co., Pump Parts Halsted & Hoggan, Pump Harbor Fire Protections, Inc., Fire Extinguisher Service Harrington Industrial Plastics, Pipe Supplies Harrisons & Crosfield, Freight Hasty Lawn & Garden, Mower L. Heitman Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Rental Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires Honeywell, Inc., Strip Charts Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies, Tools & Hardware City of Huntington Beach, Water . Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Equipment Rental Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware Irvine Ranch Water District, Water Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supplies King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, Bushings & Pipe Supplies Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware & Tools LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Hardware & Tools L & N Uniforms Supply Co., Uniform Service The La.cal Company, Inc., Pump Packing Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Equipment Parts R. H. Landin Graphics, Printing Jim Lankford Company, Adapter Larsen-Hogue, Equipment Testing Judy Lee, Employee Mileage McKesson Chemical Co., JPL Chemicals McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Hardware Majestic Fasteners Company, Hardware Marden Susco, Tools Meter Master, Inc., Equipment Repair Charles Meriam Company, Metering Supplies E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers Morrison Company, Pipe Supplies J. Mosher, Employee Mileage N B Products, Pipe Supplies National Auto Glass, Truck Parts National Lumber Supply, Building Materials Newark Electronics, Tools City of Newport Beach, Water c. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel Fees Oakite Products, Inc., Cleaner Orange Coast Hardwood, Building Materials Orange Valve & Fitting Co., Hardware Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies Pacific Engineers, Piping Pacific Pipe Tool Co., Ladders Pacific Pumping Company, Pump Parts Pacific Telephone Company Parlcwood Western Distribution, Hardware M. C. Patten Corporation, Controls AMOUNT 342.80 102.22 24.9! 69.8~. 725.49 103.71 371.t.29 42.18 45.50 594.oo 429.08 118.95 40.19 526. 29 14 .. 40 407.87 35.99 1.75 729.57 1,085.66 884.56 434.50 130.32 1,574.60 479.17 1.34 301.04 23.3? 178.5~ 28.26 818.06 79.15 . 39. 23 42.87 72.12 156.76 186.45 106.93 28.62 969.79 77.33 30.63 234.94 672.08 2,079.90 139.92 112.02 96.68 316.67 834.60 706.07 79.23 344.48 - 63.0~ 140.01 AGENDA ITEM # 30 L-2 DISTRICT 11 WARRANT NO. 25350 25351 >352 ~353 25354 25355 25356 25357 25358 25359 . 25360 25361 . 25362 ' 25363 25364 25366 25367 25368 25369 25370 25371 25372 25373 25374 25375 25376 )377 ~378 25379 25380 25381 25382 25383 25384 25385 25386 . 25387 -25388 . 25389 25390 25391 25392 25393 25~07 25395 25396 25397 25398 25399 25400 25401 -c;402 ~403 25lto4 IN FAVOR OF Postmaster, Postage Preston Weed Control, Weed Killer Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal Terry Ramey, Employee Mileage The Register, Subscription Renewal Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Aluminum Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts & Freight Ruff's Saw Service, Saw Sharpening SGA Scienti.fic, Inc., Lab Supplies Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Testing Supplies Saylor's Art & Engineering Supplies, Drafting Supplies Science Applications, Inc., Hazardous Waste Study Scientific Products, Lab Supplies Service Motor Parts, Engine Repair Sherwin Electric Service, Equipment Testing Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies John Sigler, Employee Mileage Signal-Flash Company, Barricade Rental Fred Sinasek, Employee Mileage Skil Corporation, Equipment Parts Smart & Final Iris Co., Supplies Southern California Edison Company South Orange Supply, Piping Supplies Southern California Gas Company Southern California Water Company Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Oil Company of Calif., Gasoline & Oil Sterling Art & Engineering Supply, Drafting Supplies Sun Electric Corporation, Equipment Repair Sunnen Products Co., Equipment Parts T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Parts Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage Technical Book Company, Technical Manuals Thomason Compressor Corp., Compressor Repair Margo Thomson, Employee Mileage Tustin Water Works, Water Union Oil Company of Calif., Gasoline United Auto Parts, Truck Parts United Parcel Service, Freight-Out United Reprographics, Inc., Printing United States Equipment,·Inc., Compressor Parts Utilities Supply Company, Tools & Fire Extinguishers Patrick Vail, Employee Mileage Valvate Associates, Pump Parts Wall Street Journal, Subscription Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage John R. Waples, R. ·S., Odor Consultant Waukesha Engine Servicenter, E~gine Parts Whitney's Speedometer Service, 'l'ruck Repair World Travel.Bureau, Inc., JPL Air Fare Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing AMOUNT $ 500.00 353.78 62.00 59.10 42.00 1, 196. Lf 2 2,013.59 69.68 41.50 61. !i8 40.76 12.50 1,000.00 242.55 242.34 357.50 838.38 7.20 26.00 9.00 36.17 23.09 1,137.04 64.94 1,701.89 3.00 100.05 451.70 8,504.90 26.08 74.79 134.63 118.83 46.62 26.66 70.00 7.50 35.16 107.42 299.40 14.52 66.62 1,666.71 558.57 25.86 140.89 37.96 27.30 47.10 220.80 931.51 7.63 368.73 2, 233 .!i1 AGENDA rrEM # 30 L-3 DISTRICT 11 WARRANT NO. 25405 25406 25224 25225 25226 25227 25228 25229 25230 25231 25232 25233 25234 25235 25236 25237 25238 25239 25240 252Lt1 25242 IN FAVOR OF Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Service Zodiac Paper Company, Reproduction Supplies TOTAL JOINT OPERATING CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF All Bearing Service, Inc., Tools John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services Clark Equipment Co., Forklift, A-076 County Sanitation Dist. 2 of L.A., Solids Study Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16 E.T.I. & Kordick, Retention Contract I-8-3 Forkert Engineering, Survey Pl-16 Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Mgmt. Pl-16 Industrial Indemnity Co., Contractor P2-20 Motorola, Inc., Communication Equipment Perkin Elmer Corp., Freight Porter Boiler Service, Inc., Contractor PW-035 Pyramid Fence Co., Contractor PW-039 Southern Calif. Testing Lab, Testing Pl-16 Spectra-Physics, Lab Equipment Tatkin Company, Metering Equipment · · Testing Engineers, Inc., Testing Pl-16 J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Safety Equipment Twining Laboratories, Testing Pl-16 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF AGENDA ITEM 1130 L-4 $ $ AMOUNT 1,320.55 85.52 '-"" 71,583.59 $ 141.90 20,134.13 9,450.96 25,000.00 1,234,869.80 79,613.73 1, 81~ 1. 50 11,397.00 8,956.52 1, 579. 40 30.52 33,815.70 3;076. 35 196.20 5,459.00 382.66 l,~~§:g~ 679.05 $1,438,986.62 $1,510,570.21 DISTRICT 11 DISTIUCT NO. 2 W~~NT NO. ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 25207 25208 25209 25210 25211 .. 25212 25213 25214 25215 25216 2r::0 17 ~ 25218 25219 25407A 25220 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 2-17-2 & 2-18 Mark Dakovich, Inc., Contractor 2-17-2 J. Putnam Benck, Contractor 2-15 Kasler Corporation & L.H. Woods & Sons, Contractor 2-14-2 Lowry and Associates, Engineering s~rvices 2-14-2, 2-14-3, 2-16-1, 2-17-2, & 2-18 SAWPA, Grant Payment 2-14-2 S. S. Zarubica, Contractor 2-18 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 3-18, 3-20-1, 3-21-1, & 3-21-2 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-18 & 3-19 Mike Prlich & Sons, Contractor 3-19 Southern California Testing Laboratory, Soils Testing 3-19 Sully-Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 3-20-1 A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Saliba, Contractor 3-18 A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Saliba, Contractor 3-18 City of Westminster, Facility Relocation 3-18 II $ AMOUNT 266.10 140,797.80 28,389.48 178,021.00 28,602.55 83,800.00 256,573.63 $ 716,450.56 $ 10,494.50 340.08 52,748.oo 261.72 30,240.00 198,930.50 32,000.00 7,250.00 $ 332,264.80 WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 25221 Don Koll Company, Refund Invoice Overpayment FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF AMO~· 37.11 $ 37.11 25'222 Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 7-6-7. $ 25223 McGuire Construction, Inc., Contractor 7-6-6 2,256.00 3,375.00 $ 5,631. 00 III EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE HEGULAR JOIN.T MEE'rING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUN'rY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, AND 7 OF ORANGE COl.JN:L1Y, CAL:LJl"-iRi'iIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors· of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7 of Orange County·, California, was held at the hour of 7: 30 · p .m., March 12 , 19 75 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, Califo~nia. The Cha.innan of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each Distrist's Board. * * * * * * * * * ·DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the ·Board of Directors of County Sanitation Dist~ict No. 1 be adjourned to 5:30 p.m., March 26, 1975. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m., March 12, 1975. DISTRICT 3 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: · That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to 5:30 p.m., March 26, 1975. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:56 p.m., March 12, 1975. ',, DISTRICT 5 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 5:30 p.m., March 26, .1975. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourne.d at 8:56 p.m., March 12, 1975. DISTRICT 6 Adjournment ,, Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to 5:30 p.m., March 26, 1975. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:57 p.m., March 12:· 1975. DISTRICT 7 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 5:30 p.m., March 26, 1975. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:57 p.m., March 12, 1975. DISTRICT 2. Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 5:30 p.m., March 26, 1975. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:07 p.m., March 12, 1975. . . . • STATE OF CALIFORNIAl SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitati on Districts Nos . l, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 12th day of March 19 75 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,·I have hereunto set my hand this 12th day of March, 19 75. ) S-107 l:io cir o s oi .i..i:Lrec: •J on;· itation Districta No a . 6 , and 7