HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-03-12l
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P~ 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
March 6, 1975
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11
WEDNESDAY I. MARCH 12, 1975, 7: 30 p IM I
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
T. E L E PH 0 N ES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange
County, California, will be held at the above hour and date.
Other tentative meetings:
Executive Committee (With
Special Selection Co~nittee
for Audit Services)
Adjourned Regular Meeting
of All Districts
6:00 p.m., Ma~ch 12, 1975
7 : 3 0 · p • m • , March 2 6 , 19 7 5
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County~ California
JOINT BOARDS
Reg·u'l'ar· Mee·ting
March 1 2 , 1975 -7:30 ~.~.
Post Office Box 8 127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountqin Valley, Ca lif., 92708
Tele phones :
Area Code 71 4
540-291 0
962-2411
The foll owing i s a brief explanat i on of the more
imp ortant non-rout.ine items which. appear on the enclosed
agend a and which are · not ot h erwise self-e x planatory . Warrant
list s are not attached to the agenda since they are made up
immedi ately preceding the meet i n g but wi l l appear in the com -
plete agenda available at the meet i ng .
Joint Boards
No. 6 -Report of the General .Manager~
. .
In June,.1 974, the Distr icts awarded thei'r largest
contract ever , $29 .8 mi llion , to Donovan Construction Company
for the construction of the 46 mgd ~cti~ated slud~e secondary
treatment process at our Plant No . 1 . The Districts ' Chief
Engineer will make a photo slide presentation of the progress
to date on this project and the trunk ~ewers being constructed.
in the Districts .
No . 8 -Ve rb al Report of th e Executive Committee and
Action s on the Committee's recommendations.
The Ch airman of. the Speciai Se l ection Committee .for
Audit Services, Robert Root , has asked that his committee meet ·
with the .Executive Committee to discuss their recommendations
f or the empl6yment ~f an auditor . Chairman Winn has cilled a
meeting for 6 :00 p .m., Wedn esday , Marc h 1 2 t h , preceding the
r egul ar Joint Board meet ing .
No. 10 -Consent Calendar .
The f ollowing items fall into this category in accordance
with the definition established by the Boards :
Joint Boards
No . '10-a -Comments re : Pre liminary Draft, Uniform
Connecti o n and Use Ordinance .
The Districts have received a letter from the Kerr Gl ass
Manufacturing Corporation relative t o a p~eliminary draft of the
Uni form Connection a nd Use Ordinance . It is r ecommended t hat
their comments be referred to the' staff and General Counsel .
No. 10-c -Licen&e Agreement to Occupy District
Right of Way'.
At the request of the owners of the Pantry Liquor, a
business located · on Brookhurst south of Hamilton, the staff
has prepared a License Agreement for the use of the Districts'
right of way wh i ch is appro ximate l y 30 x 100 feet. The owners
of the business e s t ablishment propose to use the surface of
the right o f way for additional parking and have agreed to pay
$50 for the preparation of the agreement plus $125 per year. It
is a 5-year agr eement with an option .for an additional five years
with biennial r e nt adjtistments tied to the cost-of-living ind e x.
The agreement contains provisions that in t he event it is neces-
sary .for our Districts t o make any repairs or excava t ion in the
area, the pavement replacement will be done at the expense of
the lessee. It is rec ommended that the agreeme nt b e app roved
·as it will reduce the Districts' maintenance expens e of the
right of way.
District No. 2
No. 10-e -Chang e Order No. 1 to Contract No. 2-18,
Ca r b on Canyon I nter cep t or Sewer .
Dur i n g th e c ourse of const r uc t ion o f Co ntract No . 2 -18
on Mill e r St reet, the contractor encountered unknown ut i l i t ies
in the v i c inity o f t he Aut o n e tics fac ility ·between La Pa l ma and
Mira Loma . Th is cau sed d ela y s and ex t ra work dur i ng the mont h
of November . I t i s the s t a f f 's r ecommenda t ion that · a c h ange
ord e r t ota l ing $9 ,955 .0 3 a n d a n extens i on of t i me of 6 cale n dar
day s b e granted t he c o ntrac t or.
No . 10-f -· Doc ument Ma p s for District No. 2 .
We h ave r e qu est ed a proposal fr om Cliffo rd A. Fo rkert,
a Civil Enginee r, t o update and ve r i f y our recor ds pe rt aini ng
to righ ts of wa y a n d th e va l i d ity of our easement docume n ts
r e l at i ve to all co n s t r u ct i on t h at h as o c c u rred wi t hin Di str i ct
No. 2 . I n c l uded in the ag enda materia l is Mr . Fo r ke r t 's pro -
p osa.1. I t i s t h e . staf f 's r e c omme n dat i on that Mr. F ork e r t be
e ngaged o n a per diem bas i s in acco r dan ce wi th hi s sc h edu le o f
cha r ges f or a n a mo u nt not t o e xce ed $7,000 .
Di s trict No . 7
No. 10-i -Ann exa tio n No . 4 6 -·Tract s Nos . 8 799 and
8827.
We hav e rec e ived a n a ppli6ation for a nriex atio n of 63
a cres in th e n orthea st corrie r of Oran ge Park Acres and Ch apma n
-2 -
...
Avenue adjacent to the Mead propert y from Residential Housing
Systems, Inc. This property is current ly being annexed to the
City of Orange and will receive sewer service through that city .
The developers propose to construct 83 single fa~ily units o n
the property which is within the population densities anticipated
for the property in the District 's Master Plan. It is the staff's
recommendation that the resolution appearing in the agenda
material initiating proceedings for the annexation be approved .
No. 10-j -Approval of Plans and Specifications for
Cbntrac t No. 7-6-7, Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer .
The Districts' eng ineers have comp l eted the construction
plans ·and specifications for the second segment of the Tustin-
Orange Trunk Sewer. ·This facility will be constructed in the
Sout hern Pacific Railway right of way from Irvine and Newport
to Fa irhaven Avenue. The staff is in the process of acquiring
right of way easements from the Railway Company . The design
engin eer has estimated there will be a substantial savings and
less inconvenience to the motoring pub lic during the const~uction
period by aligning the sewer in this right of · way iDstead of an·
alignment in pub lic streets (Ho l t and Esplanade). However , the
District will have to acquire 2 .4 acres of permanent right of
way. The .same right of .way is proposed to be acquired by the
Count y Harbors , Beaches and Parks Department for mu lti-purposes·,
such as bicycle trails,, etc. The 21"-24" VCP sewer will extend
9200 feet in length. The engineer's estimate of the construction
co st is $480,425.
District No . 11
No. 10-1 -Plans and Specifications for Remodeling of
the Newland-Hamilt on Pump Station, Contract No. l .l-4 R .
For several year s , we have budgeted f unds f or the re-
modeling· of this pump station to make its appearance more com~
patible with the surrounding residential · area . The p ropos ed
imp rovements have been approved by the Huntington Beach Planning
Commission and Bu ilding Department. The contract to be let will
improve the adjacent Southern Counties Gas Company facilities
as we ll as our own . The total cost o f . the contract will not
exceed $20 ,000, with the Southern Counties Gas Company's share
at $4 ,000. It is the staff 's recommendation that the project
be adver tised for bidding purposes .
All Districts
No. 1 2 -Dr aft Dated March, 1975 , Revised Uniform
Connection and Use Ordina n ce .
Pursu ant to the Boards' inst ructions on February 19th,
the enc l osed draft ordinance incorporates recorrµnend at ions of
-3-
the General Counsel regarding the enforcement provisions and
other matters relative to procedures established by the
ordinance. The purpose of the ordinance is to establish
source-control limitations and provide for an equitable dis-
tribution of the Districts' costs based on quality and .quant i ty
paramet ers. We are proposing a series of publ ic meetings in
accordance with the following schedule: ·
Date
·Thursday, 3/20/75
Monday, 3/24/75
Tuesday, 3/25/75
Wednesday, 3/26/75
Thursday, 3/27/75
Thursday , 3/27/75
Monday, 3/31/75
Monday, 3/31/75
Tuesday, 4/1/75
Wednesday, 4/2/75
District No. 2
Time
1: 30 p .. m.
1:30 p .. m.
1:30 p.m.
1:30 p.m.
1:30 p.m.
7:30 p.m.
1:30 p.m.
7:30 p.m.
1:30 p.m.
1:30 p.m.
Organization
Chambers of Comme rce
Conservation Groups
Public Agencies
Class I Users
Class II Users
General Public
Class I Users
General Pub lic
Manufacturing Assns.
General Public
No. 38 -Public Hearing re: Annexation No . 8 .
·On February 19th, the Board esiablished 8:30 p .m.,
March 12th, as the time of a public he~ring for the annexation
of an inhabited tract which was annexed to the City of Orange
several ·years ago but not to Sanitation District No. 2. The
tract is now occupied and annexation to the District must be
conducted as an inhabited annexation. On February 20th, material
was mailed to all District No . 2 Dtrectors concerning procedures
for annexation of this City of Orange tract.
No. 39 -St~ff Report re: Reach 3, Santa Ana River
Interceptor f rom .Grove Street in Anaheim to the County Boundary.
In October, during discussions relative to the siz ing
of the Santa Ana River Interceptor for·Reqch 3 through the Santa
Ana Canyon, the staff was directed by the Board to contact those
agencies concerned with sewer services in that area. Inc luded
with the agenda for the District No. 2 Directors is a re-
port on the staff's activities to date.
Fred A. Har.per
Gener a l Manager
_ ... ~ .....
-4-..
F:L: ·'"···············
II.
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
Count y S11 nit11ti o n D istricts
of Orange Coun ty, Ca l ifo rn ia
JOINT ·BOARDS
MEETIN G DATE
MARCH 12, 1975 -7 :30 P .M.·
(1 ) Pledge of All egiance and I n vocat i on
(2) Ro ll Ca ll -~~ 'w-~\\
(3) Appqintment of Chair men pro tern, i f neces s ary
f'l\\S ._ C3a)
Post Off ice Bo x 8 1 27
10844 Ell is Avenue
Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708
T e le phooes:
Am Code 71"
5.(0 -2910
9 62-2.( 11
AGENDA
ADJOURt•MENTS POSTED .~
COMP & Mll.EAGE ... k-:'.': ...
FILES SET. UP ....... / ...... :.
RESOLUTI ONS crnTI FIED.t/
. L[TIEi:S \'lfllTTE N ..... '. ........ .
MINUTES WRITIEN ..... v.:".'.' ••
MINU TES ~ILED .... : ... J....<.: •••
LETTER ·······-····· ln:MS ON
SUPPLEMEN TAL AGENDA
'IC .•.. TKtR •...
Consider ation of motion to r e ceiv e a nd file minu t e
ex ce~pt fr om t he City of F ountain Va lley regardi ng
election of may o r and appointmen t o f a l t~rn a t es to
serve on the Districts ' Board s as fo l low~: (*Mayor )
"-'.-................... ..
FILE ........•...••••••
LETTER ···-······-
A/C ····!KLR --
LETTE R ............. ,
A/C •••• TKLR ••••
·----·······---··· ...
(4)
®
@])
@
~
Di strict
2
3
EACH DIS TRIC T
Active
George B. S.c ott
Bernie Svalstad* ,
Al tern ate
Bernie S valst a d *
Rogert Stan t o n
Conside ration of mo tions approvi n g mi nut es of t he
follo wing mee tings , as ma iled :
Di strict 1 Febru ary 19, 197 5 r e g u lar
District 2 Februa r y 19 , 1 975 re gu lar
Di strict 3 February 19, 1 9 75 r egul a r '
Di strict 5 February 1 9 , 1 975 regular
Di s tri ct 6 Februa ry 19 ' 1975 reg ular
District 7 February 19, 1 ~75 regul ar
'J!i s tri.Q_t /.I.~ Feb-ruar_y 19-s--1 9 75 regulqry
ALL DI STRICT S
Rep o r t o f the Joint Ch a irman
.
A Li DISTRICTS
Report o f t he General Ma nage r
ALL DI STRICTS
Report of t he Gener a l Counsel
ALL DIST RICTS
Verbal r e port of the Ex e cutive Co mm i t tee
.. '
(9)
FILE .••••...........•• •·
LETIER ............ ..
A/C .••• TKLR .••• .1)..... Q~~
-····-••••••O•••HO••O
(10)
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of re comm~~dat ion of Special Sele~on
Committee for Audi V Servi res r e engagemen\; of · a_ udit ~
to conduct the 1J t 4-75 fisc a l" year audit:
(a) Report of;t~e Special Selection Commit ee
for Audit Services
( ) Cons i ~~ation of motio . to receiv , file and ·
'\ acce ~t proposal of ~...,.......----'...,,_~~.,,,..._-·......,,.-=-=,..,,-~~..,,..;.,..~~ ""-.t~ovide audit s ervices't-'0-l?-""the 197 -75 fiscal
year,for an amount not to exceed$~~.,..--~~~
ALL DISTRICTS
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters placed upon the consent calendar .are considered
as not requiring discussion or further explanation and
unless any particular item is requested t o-be removed from
the consent calendar by a Director, staff me mber, or member
of the pub lic in attendance, there wil l be no separate
discussi on of these items . All items on the consent calendar
will be enacted by one action approving al l moti ons, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the
consent calendar. All i tems removed from the consent cal endar
shall be considered in the regular order of business .
Members of the public ·who wish t o remove an item from the
consent calendar shall , upon recognition b y the chair, state
their name, address and desi gnate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar .
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any i tems are to be del~ted from
the cons ent calendar . C. ~ e
Consideration of action ~o approv~ all agenda items appear ing Roll Call Vote Qr Cast
unanimous Ballot on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same .
FI LE
LETIER ······-·--
A/C ••.• TKLR ••••
FILE -·····-··-·-G'--~
A/C .... TKLR ••••
ALL DI3'f'RIC~ ,, ";>.., ~.s , w ~'1 _
(a) Consideration of motion to receive ~nd file commen t s
of Kerr Glass Manufacturing Co rporation , dated
F ebruary 1 3, 19 75, in connect i o n with the Districts '
tentative draft of revised Uniform Connection and Use
Ordinance and refer to staff and General Counsel
(b) Consideration of motion to receive , file and r eject
amended claim of Kelly Timothy Kel~as f iled by Charl e s A .
Price, Attorney for Claimant, for alleged damage or
·injury incurred in an accident involving a District-·
owned vehicle, as recommended by the General Counse l
Consideration of Resolution No . 75 -37, approvi ng License
to Occupy Right of Way with .Jack R. Fenton and Wayne R.
Peterson, A Pa rtnership, and authorizing District No. 1
to execute said li cense, in form .approved -by General
Counsel: See page "A"
(d) Consideration pf motion to receive and file staff
progress report on Treatment P l ant Construction
Projects. See page "B"
(CONS E NT CALENDAR continued on page 3)
-2 -
(10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
FILE .••...•....•••••••
LEITER ·······-···-
A/C •..• TK LR ••••
DISTRICT 2
~ Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1,
to the plans and specifications for Carbon Canyon ·
.Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-18, authorizing an
addition of $9,955.03 for extra work due to undisclosed
utilities and granting an extension of time of 6 calendar
days for completion of said work, to the contract with
~--r.(j·:··· / < r) LEITE R::\~ ••.. ¥
S. S. Zarubica. See page "C"
Considera~ion of motion to receive, file and accept
proposal of Clifford A. Forkert, Civil Engineer, dated
March ~. 1975, for pr~paration of right of way
document maps and records, on a per diem fee basis,
for a maximum amount not to exceed $7,00Q.OO
FllE
A/C ..•. TK LR ••.•
FI LE ·······-·····-
LEITER ············-
A/C .... TKLR ••••
LEITER ··········-
~ _:;~A.~-. .----:-
~ -~~S,0/"
FI LE ············~--··
LEITER ···-·····-~~ µ,-{<.J
/C •... TKLR ·-
:g._~e ~--.
... ~: .... -
IL..<.'. ......... ..
LEIT ER ............ ..
A/C .... TKLR ....
---···----
(11)
(g)
See page "D"
Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress
reports on construction of th·e Yorba Linda Pump Station, .
Contract No. 2-15; the Carbon Canyon -Palm Drive Inter-
ceptor-Sewer, Reach 2, from Carbon Canyon Channel to
Kraemer Boulevard, Contract No. 2-17-2; and. the Carbon
Canyon Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-18. See pages
"E" "F" , and "G"
DISTRICT 3
(h) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress
reports on construction of the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4,
Contract No. 3-18; the Imperial Relief Interceptor,
Reaches 22 & 23, Contract No. 3-19; and the Knott Inter-
c~ptor, Reaches 5 & 6, Contract No. 3-20-1. See page~
"H" "I" , and "J"
DISTRICT 7
(i) Consideration of Standard Resoltition No. 75-38-7,
authorizing initiation of p~oceedings to annex approxi-
mately 62.64 acres of territory to the District in the
vicinity of the northeast corner of Orange Park Acres
and Chapman Avenue (Proposed Annexation No. 46 Tracts
Nos. 8799 and 8827 •to County Sanitation District No. 7)
(j ) Consideration of Standard Resoluti on No. 75-39-7,
approving plans and specifications for Tustin-Orange
Trunk Sewer, Reach 11 and a Portion of Reach 12;
Contract No . 7-6-7, and authorizing .advertising for
' ·bids .
Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress
report on construction of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer,
Reach 10, Contract No. 7-6-.6. See page "K"
DISTRICT 11
(1) Consideration of Resolution No. 75-40-11,
approving plans and specifications to Remodel Newland-
Hamil ton Pumping Station Facilities, Contract No. ll-4R,
and authorizing advertising for bids
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
ALL DISTRIC'rs
Considera tion of motion to receive, file and take under advise-
ment tentative draft of revised Uniform Connection and Use
Ordinance, dated March, 1975, and authorizing the staff to
circulate the proposed ordinance and schedule informal hearings
(Copy enclosed)
-3-
.. •
FIL E '. ..•....•......•••
LETTER ·······-··-·
A/C .•.• TKLR -··
-··-·-~··· .... ·-········-
FILE
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideratio n o.f motion t o re ce ive and file certification
·of the General Manager that he has checked all bills
appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and
that he recoinmends authorization f or payment
( 14.) ALL DISTRICTS
(14) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint
110tt CALL VOTE .• -· Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund accounts
payab l e check registers for signature of the Chairman
su,,,_,:J:~TsA~~GENDA of District No. 1, and authorizing payment of claims e listed on page "I"
ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda
items, ·
(15 ) Consideration of motio·n authorizing the Districts' staff
to proceed with any additional process development work
on the JPL activated carbon process in an amount not to
exceed $100 , 000, pursuant to the conditions· of t he State
and Federal Step 1 Grant authorization to proceed with
mMSON
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA
the construction and operation of a 1 MGD reactivated
carbon wastewater treatment process facility. (In July,
1974, the Boards declared their intent to match funds with
the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the National Aeronautics
Space·Administration in an amount not to exceed $100,000
for additional process development.)
LETTER ·····-····-·
A /C •.•. Tl<LR ••••
DISTRICTS 2 ,3 ,7 & 11
Considerat ion of a nnexation policy and fee schedule.
(See enclosure) ~ 15 ~1~ -Z..1 15-'/3 -3 .... TS -</./-17
(17) QI8~~IQ~g 1 & 7
· 9omlide1 atiem Of me1;1el"l f!:fjfH'e vi;l'lg B'l:lBf!!!l"IB!! f1:tl"1El: l1'f!:l"!'f!:l"11;!!,
if f!:l"IY• See B'l:lf3f3lel!lel"l'al ageHae a'1;aefimel"l~
(18) BIS'i'RIS'P 1
(19)
(20)
(21)
Eiel"l!!ieie?"a1;iel'l ef llletiel"l a1313l"e'lil"lg HS!l"l!'&l"l+iB j if al"ly.
See Bttf!f!lemel"l1;e:l e:geHae e:1;te:efime!'l1;
DISTRICT 1
Oth_::yln:ls :rn;ss ~~omniunicatio_ns~·e rne nt al agenda
;t-e ms, if any ~
;
DI STRIC T 1 S: 3 o
Con s ideration of moti o n to adjourn to ·'(-:-3-0-p.m., Wedn esday,
March 26, 1 975 ~ · . .s S
DIB'i'RIO'PS J & 11
9eueie!er a'bien ef Pne'Eien a~131 e u iug; ett!9J!>@li2'C :@and ;;a11 ants ,
if &RY eee ett1313le!l!eH1;i;tl &gel"lda e:+i+ie:eh"1e11t
N\ \ '::>( 2.2) DISTRIC T 3
(22) Consideration of motion approving warrants .
ntMSON
SUPPLE MENTAL AGENDA
See .page "II"
(23) :P IS TRICT 3 · · .
\Oth er )1:1-S~R.~m:Cithir,1s-..Q..:c-s1J.pp leriie ntal
t-t ,ems , if a ny
agen da
( 24) DISTRICT 3 S ;-3,o
Consideration of mo tion to adj o urn to ~D ~.m., Wednesda y,
March 26, 1 9 75 g : S-(o
(f5) DIS'PRIO'Ps s & e
Ge~aiael!'&tie l"l ef ffiOtioR a~~PoviRg sws~@Rse fwRd waPPaRt~,
See e 'l:lf'l'leme n1;al e:t;euaa e:eeaefimene
(26) DIS'PR IO 'P 5
( 27)
(2 8)
GeueieieI e:'eien ef me'6ieA B:f!l~Fe; itt~ \:!:r 1 e.!1181!, if e:P!y.
See Bttp15lcmental egeride: aet.achmeut
D~STRICT ~ . ·
. o her bus l-n.e~-eommui11c-a.t.!Qn§_or--sa pp I em!ffita l agenda
i terns, if a nY-.
DISTR IC T 5 .5: ~o
Consideration of motion to a djourn to ~p.m., We dnesday,
March 26 , 19 7 5 v • o .S {p
-4-
~ • • • t""'
E.29)
(30)
(31)
DIS':PHIGtE' e
GeHeideratioR ef met1QR apppg\•1Rg HQPP&Rt&, if 8:PIY.
See ~ttr>r>lemental a~eHeia aeeaehmeut
DISTRICT 6 s-·· ~u
Consideration of motion to adjourn to -1+3Q-p.m., Wednesday,
March 26, 1975 ~~ 5 '1
.~/_s (32) DISTRICT 7
{32) Co n side ration of motion appro ving warrants.
ITTMS ON s II TII"
SUPPlEMEt{TAL AGENDA ee pag e -------=---
{ 33) · DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(34) .DISTRICT 7 S'-Z:.O
Consideration of motion to adjourn to~p.m., Wednesday,
March . 26, 1 97 5 ~·-S1
(35) DIS~HIG~ 11
Co11side1 atio11 of 111otion appr o u ing 11&11 a111'e, if an:y .
Bee Bl:tf'f'lemel"l1;e:l a~el'lee: aM;aeh1nel'li:i
\_{36) ~TR ~ -----------· ~h'erbUsinesS'an~rcatio.ns ol:-.s.u.pp.lem~genda
· items, if any . .
.( 37) DISTRICT,,.....l~ . . ~
Consideration f motion 0-adJOUr~n~ay,
.__.,r.arch 26, 1975
mE .................. 0 DISTRICT 2
(A) Public hearing (to begin at 8:30 p.m .) re ,proposed .
Annexat ion No. 8 -Tract No. 4980 to Coun~y Sanitation
District No. 2: 6
LEITER ............ ..
..
A/C .... TK LR ....
-~ ~ Open hearing .
~ Sununary of Lo9al Agency Formation ·commission's
. and District No . 2's action re proposed anne xati on
{3) Written protests and withdrawals of same, if any
(4) Oral ·protests, if any ·
FILE ................. . (5) Determination ot sufficiency o~ pr otests , if ~ny
(6) Close hearing -§!'R '?.4~ __ ._.,-'II
A/C .... TKLR •••• (B) Conside ration of Resolution No. 75-.!fiis-2, ordering
....................... _Roll Cell Vote or Cast
Unan imous Ballot
annexation of approximately 7,979 acres to the District
in the vicinity of Ma llard Stree t and Collins Avenue
(Proposed Annexation No . 8 -·Tract No. 4980 to Co unty
Sanitation District No. 2)
fc;;)l DISTRICT 2 ~ Staff r eport re Sant a Ana River Interceptor from La Palma Avenue
to Orange Co unty Line, Contract No. 2-14-3. (See enclos·ure)
~1/$(40) DISTRICT 2
ITEMS ON ( 4 O )
SUl'PLEMEN TA L AGENDA
Cons ide rati on o f motion approv ing wa rrants.
See page "I I"
( 1) DISTBI~ . ~
ot·h e r bu s in e-~d comm unications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(42) DISTRICT 2 ..6''.30
Considerati on of motion to adjourn to ~-p.m., Wednesday,
March 26, 1975 Cf·. D'1
-5-
---i
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
March 12, 1975 -7:30 p.m.
'·
RESOLUTION NO. 75-37.
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF LICENSE TO OCCUPY
RIGHT OF WAY WITH JACK R. FENTON AND
WAYNE R. PETERSON, A PARTNERSHIP
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF ·
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF LICENSE TO OCCUPY
RIGHT OF WAY WITH JACK R. FENTON AND WAYNE
R. PETERSON, A PARTNERSHIP .
* * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boardsof Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, Californi~,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain License to Occupy Right of Way,
dated · , is hereby approved; and,
Section 2. That County Sanitation District No. 1, as agent for
itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of
Orange County, California, is hereby authorized and directed· to enter
int~ said agreement granting Jack R. Fenton and Wayne R. Peterson, a
Partnership, right of way in the vicinity of Brookhurst Street,
Hamilton Avenue and the Santa Ana River, for cqnstruct~on and mainten-
ance of an asphalt parking lot 30.6 feet wide and 101.0 feet long; and,
Section 3. That· payment of an initial lump-sum fee in the amo.unt
of $50.00 plus $100 per annum payable yearly in ·advance for use of
said.right of way, is hereby authorized; and,
Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1
are hereby authorized and directed to execute said License to Occupy
Right of Way, ·in form approved by the Districts' General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 12, 1975.
AGENDA ITEM #lO(c) -A-ALL DISTRICTS
PROGRESS REPORT
TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS
P2-20 -POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT PLANT NO. 2 -($158,294)
Districts taking over job at Contractor's request.
CO.UNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALI FOHN IA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9;>/0A
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
Lighting fixtures installed. Transformer set in place.
Two of ·the three motor control centers are installed.
Contract approximately 95 percent complete to date.
Pl-16 -46 MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT AT 'RECLM-1ATION PLANT NO. 1 -($ 29, 876, 000)
Major foundation work completed. Structural work continues in all areas.
Aeration basin walk 70 percent complete. Placement of aerator top deck
~o begin this month.
Blower building basement slab completed with walls and lower deck
presently under way. Machinery dimension problems caused some delay
in this area.
Secondary clarifier slab on grade work continues and is estimated to be
completed this month.
Digester No. 9 -lower walls po,ured. No. 10 -lower walls to follow·.
Basement level and tunnels of digester control building in place.
Garfield Avenue block wall and Ward Street improvements complete.
PW-035 -ADDITIONAL BOILER FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2 -($39,047)
Boiler in place.
Work certified complete.
PW-039 -CHAI.N LINK SECURITY FENCE AT EAST ENTRANCE, RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 -
($3,418.17)
All work essentially complete.
AGENDA ITEM #lO(d) B-1 ALL DISTlUCTS
:'-"
Progress Report
Treatment Plant Projects
Page Two
TREATMENI' PLANT WORK
Total Value Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Total Work During February
DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK
Total Value Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Total Work During February
Total· Work Under Design
Total Work Out to Bid
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
$30,0-76,760
9,926,818
1,278,970
$21,222,237
9,571,030
528,220
·10,568,340
·S51, 257
(714) 962-2411
$30,076,760
$21,222,237
10 ,568' 340
551,257
TOTAL AMOUNI' 0NDER CONTRACT, DESIGN, AWAITING AWARD
AND OUT TO BID $62,418,594
March 6, ·1975
AGENDA ITEM #lO(d) B-2 ALL DISTRICTS
cou:~TY S.:\:H TA Tl o:.; J) I !;r1: J CTS or-cw,\: :GE cou::TY
P. o. Box 8127 -lOo-14 Elli:; AVC'llUC
Fountain Valley, California ~2708
CllA~GE OIU>ER
C.O. NO.-1
co•nr~C.TOR: _...;.s;;..;•;...._s~. _ZAR_UB_ICA ___________ _ DATE ---=-~~b-r~ch~6-,~1~9~7~5-----~
JOB: CARBON CANYON INfERCEF'I'OR SEVER,. LA PALMA AVBruE TO CRClffiIER AVENUE, COITTRACT NO. 2-18
Amount of this ·change Order (ADD) (l'H:iMtH~T) $ 9,955.03
In accordance with contract provisions, the following·changcs in the
contract an<l/or contract work arc hereby a1:1thorizcc.l anc.l as cor:1pcnsation
therefor, the following. additions to or deductions from tl1c contract price arc
hereby approvc<l.
Reference: Inspection reports of November
6, 7, 13, 14, 18 & 19, 1974 and
Contractor's invoice dated
January 20, 1975.
ADD:
For delays and extra work on the .
above dates caused.by unknown utilities
Extension of Time
The contractor is hereby granted a
time extension for the above extra
work of
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION
Summary of Contract Time
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Ext~nsion·This Change Order
Total Time Extension
Revised Contract Time ·
Revised Completion Date
TOTAL ADD
9,~55.03
9,955.03
6 Calendar Days
6 Calendar Days
.June 27, 1974
240 Calendar Davs
February 22, 1975
6 Calendar ,Days
a.Calendar Days
246 Calendar Days.
February 28, 1975
Original Contract Price $ 1,472,160.42
Prcv. Auth. Changes $ 0.00
This Change (ADD) cmmm~1) $ . 9,955.03
Amended Contract Price $ 1,482,115.45
.Hoard authorization date: March iz, 1975 Approved:
COUNTY SANITATIO~J DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By------------~----~--.,..~...-~ Consulting Engineer
By--------~----------~~~-:.-::-= AGENDA ITEM #lO(e) Contractor -C-
By
--------------------~------------Chief Engineer
DISTRICT 2
CLIFFORD A. FORKERT
CIVIL ENGINEER
22311 BROOKHURST
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92646
(714) 963-6793
March 4,· 1975
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Reference: Proposed preparation of Document Maps for District
No. 2
Attention: Mr. Ray Lewis
Dear Sir:
The following is a general outline of our proposed procedure
whfch we have developed after conversations with you and ·
Mr. Herbert Kyzer of your organization.
1.
2.
3.
AGENDA ITEM #lO(f)
An index. to the maps will be prepared showing the
entire 7 districts and will be based on Zone VI of
the Lambert projection system as derived frcm the
Standard Wall Maps of Orange County.
The maps will be prepared on linen.or mylar, depending
on your preference, however it should be noted that
linen is becoming increasingly difficult to acquire
and since most public agencies have come to accept
mylar for mapping it maybe more feasible to accept the
mylar for this purpose.
We intenc to make the maps on 28 inch x 41 inch
material of your choice, this will allow a one inch
boi::der on three sides and ample room on the bottom
for any Title Block which you may desire. The actual
mapping grid will be 25 inches or 15,000 feet and
38.33 inches or 23,000 feet. It would be preferable
to orient North to the left on the map, since the
great majority of your trunks arc in a North-South
direction. This would greatly reduce the number of
maps required. The above figures are based on a scale
of 1 inch equals 600 feet, which would greatly facilitate
the preparation of the maps, since most of the line work
can be traced directly from the Orange County Wall Maps.
D-1 DISTRICT 2
• ..
·CLIFFORD A. FOR KE RT
CIVIL ENGINEER
22311 BROOKHURST
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92646
(714) 963-6793
4. We would search the records of Orange County for
the pertinent documents; however we would require
the year in which you interid to begin. According
to our conversation with the Recorder's Office the
documents are listed by the Grantee for each year,
due to this systeffi it may be preferable to search
the.entire 7 districts ~tone time. It is our
understanding that we will acquire the recording
references only and that your organization will
actually order the documents since there would not
be a charge to you.
5. We would index each document and prepare a master
listing, in addition we would prepare a card file
listing each document by number, Granter, recording
·reference, date and other pertinent data. A
dupli~ate would be made of each card and filed on
another system of your choice. It should be noted
most Counties are going to an Instrument No. and
date for all future recordings and this may be your
preference for the duplicate filing card. In
reference to Item 4 if all documents are acquired at
one time the indexing could. be completed prior to
mapping the other districts.
. 6. Each document would then be plotted on the map ·and
the document reference number shown.
7. The documents wo9ld be then filed in folders of
perhaps 50 to 75 documents depending on the length
of the·documents.
8. Since the County Wall Maps do not show lots, it
would be helpful in plotting the documents if
assessor's maps were available, perhaps these are
in your old work order files.
We believe the above procedures would make all easements
readily available, and the ·system would be as simple as possible
to follow for even your newest personnel and the maps of
this size when reduced to half size would make a completely
legible office work sheets. ·
We understand that this contract would be on a cost of materials
and labor basis per the inclosed rate sheet.
AGENDA ITEM #lO(f) D-2 DISTRICT 2
CLIFFORD A. FORKERT
CIVIL ENGINEER
22311 BROOKHURST
. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92646
(714) 963-6793
The estimated cost of this project is not to exceed Seven
Thousand dollars ($7,000.00) f~r District 2, however due to
the unknown number of documents involved, researching all
documents at one time and preparing only one index map,
this figure could not be considered as concrete until·further
information is available.
We appreciate the opportunity to submit .this proposal. We
hope that we can be of service to you on this project.
Cordially,
~~ Forkert, civil engineer
•
,,
AGENDA ITEM #lO(f). D-3 .DISTRICT 2
... .
·'
·.
Clifford A. Forkert
Civil Engineer 22311 Brookhurst St.
Huntington Beach, CA
(714) %3-6793
Suite I
ll2t.>4u
ITEM I -FIELD:
ST ANDA RD RATE'S
SCHEDULE OF CHARGES
CIVIL ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
Effective August 1, iq74
(1) 40 hours per week, 8 hours per day,
operating from Headquarters:
a. Field Inspector .
'Plus mileage.
b. Furnishing Field Supervisor
c. Furnishing Two Ma~ Survey Party
d. Furnishing Three Man Survey Party .
e. Furnishing Four Man Survey Party .
Travel time after 8-hour work day is to be
charged at the above rates -e.g. straight time.
(2) Atn'HORIZED OVERTIME:
·a. ·time worke<l in exces~ of 8 hours per day,
(excluding travel time) and for work per-
formed on Saturday (maximum 11 hours),
multiply above rates by 1.3.
b. For work performed on Sunday (maximum 11
hours), multiply above rates by l. u.
(3) PER DIEM:
a. When job location requires men to work away
from Headquarters -Board and Room furnished:
fdd $13.00 per day, ~er man.
RATE
HOUR DAY.
. $18.45 $147.60
• $20.75 $166.00
• $41. 25 $330.00
• $60.00 $480.00
.. $74.00 $592.00
(4) SPECIAL SURVEYING EQUIPMENT -Addition to crew rates:
1.
2.
AGENDA ITEM #lO(f)
Electronic Measuring Equipment -Long Range:
Electronic Measuring Equipme11t -Short Range:
D-4
Plua $11.00hr.
Plus $3:00 hr.
DISTRICT 2
---------------------· -·
. .
'
Clifford· A. Forkert
Civil Engineer 22311 Brookhurst St. Suite I
Huntington Beach, CA 92646
(71'•) 963-6793
SCHEDt.n.E OF CHARGES {STANDARD2
ITEM II -OFFICE TIME:
(1) a. Drafting
b. Calculating
c. Design •
-Au~ust lz 1974
RATE
HOUR ·DAY
• $17.50
• $18.00
. $19.50
d. Supervisor .. $20.00
(2)
e. Legal Description Writing
f. Title Examination
g. Lookup and Delivery
h. Document Typing
i. Professional Consultation
At.TrHORIZED OVERTIME:
a. Time worked in excess of 8 hours per day
and for work performed' on Saturday (maximum . . ·11 hours), multiply above rates by 1.3.
b. · For work performed on Sunday (maximum 11
hours), multiply above rates by 1.6. ,, . .
(3) PER DIEM:
a. When joQ location requir.es men to work away
from Headquarters -Board and Room furnished
Add $15.00 per day, per man.
ITEM III PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
a. Registered Civil Engineer
Plus mileage from Headquarters.
b. Registered Civil Engineer - 8 hours
per day basis, away from Headquarters,
Board and Room required
AGENDA ITEM #lO(f)· D-5
• $20.00
• $20.00
$ 8.50
$ 8.50
$29.00
. $24.00
• $212.00
DISTRICT 2 ..
. .
Clifford A. forkert
Civil En~ineer
SCHEDULE OF CHARGES (STANDARD) -August 1. 1974
ITEM III -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (cont'd):
ITEM IV
c. Registered Civil Engineer -
Consulting
COMPtrrER TIME:
a. I.B.M. Computer
b. Keypunch Operator
GENERAL CONDITIONS:
22311 nrookhurst St.
Huntin~ton R~ach, CA
(714) %3-b793
RATE
HOUR DAY
$29.00
$40.00
$ 8.20
Suite
92u4b
(1) Headquarters, as referred to herein, is our Huntington Beach office.
(2) The 8'.chedule of charges for surve/ parties, as shown above
under Item 11) c, d and e, includes transpo~tation, (4-wheel
drive excluded), within a radius of 25 miles of Headquarters;
survey instruments; equipment and insurance as required to
perform various types of land surveying, excepting jobs
requiring special fnstruments and equipment, or of an unusual
natures, such as:
a.
b.
Triangulation surveys requiring first and second
order work.
Surveys requiring electronic distance:measuring
equipment. . .
" c. Precise level surveys •
d. Hydrographic surveys requiring off-shore equipment.
e. Work in remote areas not practically_ accessible by
automobile transportation or where the· establishment
of a camp site is required.
(3) Jobs that require survey parties of two or more men where
the job location is· beyond a radius of 25 miles from
Headquarter~, a charge of $0.15 per mile will be made
for each mile over 50 miles of travel each day, unless
otheNise noted.
. . ·--·----·--·-·--·
AGENDA ITEM #lO(f) D-6 DISTRICT 2
'
•
·-··-·----··-·---
Clifford A. Forkert
Civil Engineer 22311 Brookhurst St.
Huntington Beach, CA
(714) %3-6793
SCHEDULE OF CHARGES (STANDARD) -August 1, 1974
GENERAL CONDITIONS (cont'd):
(3) (Cont'd)
Jobs requiring one man operation, such as Chief of Parties,
Field Inspectors, Field Supervisors or Registered
Civil EnKineers, where the job location requires the
employee to work from a field office or field Head-
quarters,. and transportation is required, a~harge of
$0.15 per mile or a minimum of $12.00 per day for each
vehicle will be made.
(4) When 4-wheel drive equipment (jeep) is required, a ·charge
of $14.00 per day will be made for each vehicle.
(5) Material to be charged at cost, plus 20%.
·.•
Suite I
9264&
AGENDA ITEM #lO(f) D-7 DISTRICT 2
M E M 0 R A N D U M
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of.ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71<4) 540-2910
(71<4) 962-2411
March 6, 1975
TO:
FROM:
Fred A. Harper, General Manager
Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
SUBJECT: Yorba Linda Pump Station, Contract No. 2-15
Installation of ·steel has been completed.
placed for the floor .of the pump station.
for pump station walls are under way.
REL:BEW:TR:ss
AGENDA ITEM #lO(g) -E-
Concrete has been
Erection of forms
DISTRICT 2
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
M E M 0 R A N D U M
March 6", 197 5
Fred A. Harper, General Manager
Ray E. L~wis, Chief Engineer
. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
c,, ORANGE couNrv. CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2-411
Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer, Reach 2,
Carbon Canyon Channel to Kraemer Boulevard, Contract
No. 2-17-2
1,500' of VCP has been installed on Palm Drive. The contractor
estimates completing 100' per day. Backfill operations are in
progress. Paving will follow later this month. Construction is
moving well and should remain on schedule.
REL:BEW:TR:ss
AGENDA ITEM #lO(g) F-1 DISTRICT 2
tj
H
C/l
t-3
::::0
H
0
t-3
f\)
.·
~ C'cm; !el,:·
:e •• •• lo be Cons (ll"uci~d
(
>
'°41...Alt
.q
~
. .
{' ar bdl'? {;;/1!:f0/'J -/J /n'1 Or1°ye
/rJ /ercc;>lor S'cvf//?r'
t<>l"ich 2 .
. ('r.Jr,/,.t:tc/ ih, Z-17-2
(
a:
Q
%
'° ::,,
0 ~
0
IX)
)(
0
~
~
Q
~
-~
~
..J
~
ct'
Q
tu
lJ
~ ....
"'> -">
MO~SE AV
1 mi le ".,C 39" pi;oe
Ctt11lrt?cl t7wL7rdcd: tJ~c: I /
1
74
Cos I: .1' 53~ 4t:,2
I I , I 5credvled' ..;;,. t'om_pll':t1,1n. '-'1,v 2~1 75
.(
MEMORANDUM
March 6, 1.975
TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager.
FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
1084" ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71 ") 5"0-2910
(71 "l 962-2" 11
SUBJECT: Carbon Canyon Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-18
.
Installation of RCP on Miller and Crowther has been completed. All backfill
and paving has been installed.
Approximately 2,000' of RCP has been installed on La Palms. Backfill operations
are in progress. The contractor estimates completing pipe installation by
the last of March.
Grove Street has been paved and is considered completed. La Palma from Grove
Street to Miller has been closed to through traffic. Local traffic is allowed
to flow up to Grove Street and Fountain Way. All efforts have been made to .
. alleviate hampering business ~raffic.
REL:BEW:TR:ss
AGENDA ITEM #lO(g) G-1 DISTRICT 2
:i>
0
trl z
t:1
:t>
H
i-3
trl
~
~
~
0 ,,......
....__,
0
I
I\.)
ti
H
Cll
8
::D
H
(')
8
I\.)
(
. COMPLETE
••••••• TO gE CONSTRUCTED
CARBON CANYON INTERCEPTOR SEWER
LA PALMA AVENUE TO CROWTHER AVENUE
CONTRACT NO. 2-18
(
1. 3 MI LES OF 66 11 & 39" Pl PE
CONTRACT AWARDED JUNE 27, 1974
COST: $1,472,160 SCHEDULED roR COMPLETION FEBRUARY, 197
(
MEMORANDUM
March 6, 1975
TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager·
FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
SUBJECT: Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18
.COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
o~ ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
IOU-4 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71-4) 5-40-2910
(71-4) 962-2-411
Installation of RCP for the siphon at Edwards Street will begin upon opening
of one lane of north hound traffic on Goldenwest.
Paving has been installed on Goldenwest from Main Street to the jacking pit
at Westminster Avenue. Boring operations are in progress. Tunnel operations
have progressed 80'. 70' of liner plate has been installed. Tunnel
·operations have been hampered du~ to numerous broken sewers.
The Contractor estimates completing tunnel heading north by the end of this
we~k. Pipe installation is scheduled to begin by the middle of March.
South bound traffic on Goldenwest is limited to one lane. East bound traffic
on Westminster Avenue is limited to one lane.
Welding of the PVC liner plate in the installed pipe is completed.
REL:BEW:TR:ss
AGENDA ITEM #lO(h) H-1 DISTRICT 3
·~~ .]
'lS N0.11M J 0 ~ >-~ 'l.SN~~~I'-z t-'l~ ~NOW_] til ZlLZ L
'.:)Qd
'JS ~ng N~~=i. ~ z O· ~ IL
J ~ 0 ()
'l.S NO;~=i c __,
~ c_
3 'J,S c;J-4\fCl\I -=.
;1
~
f2 ~ n..
lU g u
~ \.) l-~ z ~
t-
'lS N~0109
t-\jl ...-\LJZ ~ .-()
IL(J Y. OL ~ -c0
<() ~
I 3,0 ~
~ I • t> • <( • ~ • t-• z
0 u
AGENDA ITEM #lO(h) H-2 "DISTRICT 3
MEMORANDUM
March 6, 1975
TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager
FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
SUBJECT: Imperial Relief Interceptor, Reaches 22 & 23, Contract No. 3-19
550 L.F. of VCP remains to be installed. All other VCP has been installed.
Dewatering operations are in progress east of Harbor. Paving installation
has been completed.
The siphon under the Orange Co~nty Flood Control box is complete.
Installation of VCP pipe under Harbor Boulevard will begin after approval
from the Department of Transportation.
The. contractor estimates completing all work by the middle of April. The
contractor has and is presently handling construction operations in an
extremely professional manner which h~s been a great asset to the 'District.
As per State standards, east bound traffic is limited to one lane from
-7 A.M. to 2 P • .M. After 2 P.M. east bound traffic is returned to two lanes
of traffic.
REL:BEW:TR:ss
AGENDA ITEM #lO(h) I-1 DISTRICT 3
)>
0
l:zj z
0
)>
H
8
l:zj
3
=;t::
I-'
0
!:J'
H
I
I\.)
0
H
Ul
8
:::0
H
(')
8
lJJ
_J\LAHASRA ll.BLvo1t II fl lltAHASRA llsLvo II t;fl
Q
~
.J
:r
tJ c:c
llJ co
LAMBE.RT
-zttBEGIN
// , PROJECT
COMPLETE
t-
41)
0
:r
<(
0
••••••• TO BE CONSTRUCTED
(
...
"'
..;.
IMPERIAL
SANOELWOOD AV~
7r
IMPERIAL RELIEF INTERCEPTOR
REACHES 22 & 23
CONTRACT NO. 3-19
(
1-
4,/)
~ND L ~ROJECT
uJ
1-
2
uJ
~ a.
1.lf MILES OF 2lf 11 , 21", & 18 11 PIPE
CONTRACT AWARDED: OCTOBER 7, 1974
COST: $778,372
SCHEDULED FOR COMPLETION APRIL, 1975
(
M E M 0 R A N D U M
March 6, 1975
TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager
FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2-411
SUBJECT: Knott Interceptor, Reaches S and 6, Contract No. 3-20-1
Dewatering operations ·are in progress in the middle of Goldenwest. Bypass
laterals are being installed.. A start pit on Golcenwest just north of
Westminster Avenue has been excavated and shored. The shield has been set
in the trench.
An 8" VCP bypass sewer on Goldenwest has been installed. Installation of
RCP is scheduled to begin the middle of March.
Traffic is hampered on Goldenwest· from Westminster Avenue to Garden Grove
Boulevard due to construction and storage of materials; All efforts have
been made to alleviate traffic problems
REL:BEW:TR:ss
AGENDA ITEM #lO(h) J-1 DISTRICT 3
0 :J' r
y
I
I\)
t:1
H
C/.l
t-3
::0
H
()
t-3
w
-t
GOLOEN WE'ST
)>
~
o:>
fTl
-t (/)
-t
)> 111 r-
\I)
x
~ ..
Comp le le
•I I e I e 8 J; /;11 Con:rlr-t.1cktl
(
CD ,-
<
0
!<'no-I-I ln-lerceplor
Reaches 5 t f,
r-
)>
>
"O
(/)
0 z
)> ,
<
Conl~acl A/4 3-2()-f
(
', ""
WESTERN
------------
u-a
-4
(\ 0 x: X> ~ > 'Q
~
)> n z. ::c
)>
z z
Pl r
~
RR
(
TO:
FROM:
M E M 0 R A N D U M
March 6, 1975
Ered A. Harper, General Manager
Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
108-44 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(71-4) 962-2411
SUBJECT: Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 10, Contract No. 7-6-6
The contractor began working in the intersection of Red Hill and
Mitchell on February 25, 1975. Installation of the temporary
bypass system was completed on March 3, !975, diverting the flow
out of the Contract No. 7-2, 21" VCP into the Contract No. 7-2R,
36" sewer.
Traffic is restricted to one lane each way at the intersection.
A temporary chain link fence is installed around the excavation
during non working hours.
REL:BEW:TR:ss
' .
AGENDA ITEM #lO(k) K-1 DISTRICT 7
.l> ·< . f2l
·Z : c:
. fTl
RED H l LL. AVENUE
(
---Con?j'le.fe eee.e•• lb '7e conslrv~fed
(./) CJ> ~
2 X>
< '-)> c z )>
z
...
•
Tusfin -OrctnC/e TYvnk: Se::'wer .,,.
K)each 10
Con .f ra .c .f J../t:J, '/ ... ~ -.~
(
(J')
-j
"})
Ill
fT• -;
'75
(
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
DISTRICTS 2 & 3
JOINT BOARDS
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS
MARCH 12, 1975 -7:30 P.M.
Post Off ice Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 714'
54'0-2910
962-24' 11
AGENDA
(3a) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute
excerpt from the City of Fountain Valley regarding
election of mayor and appointment of alternates to
serve on th~ Districts' Boards as follows: (*Mayor)
District
2
3
ALL DISTRI.CTS
Active
George B. Scott
Bernie Svalstad*
Alternate
Bernie Svalstad*
Rogert Stanton ·
(14) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving J o int
Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund ·accounts
payable check registers . for signature of the Chairma n
of District No. 1, and authorizing payment of claims
listed on I?age · "I"
(15) Consideration of motion authorizing the Districts' staff
to proceed with any additional process development work
on ' the JPL activated carbon process in an amo unt not to
exceed $100,000, pursuant · to the conditions of the State
and Federal Step 1 G~ant authorization to proceed with
the construction and operation of a 1 MGD reactivated
carbon wastewat er treatment process facility. (In July,
1974, the ~cards declared their intent to match funds with
the Jet· Propulsion Laboratory and the Na tional· Aeronautics
Space Administration in an amount not to exceed $100 ,000
for additional process development .)
DISTRICT 3
(22) Consideration of motion approving warrants .
See page "II"
DISTRICT 7
(32) Consideration of motion approving warrants.
See I?age "III"·
DISTRICT 2
(40) Consideration of motion appr.oving warrants.
See page "II"
-2-
WARRANT NO.
-243 ~244
25245
25246
25247
25248
25249
25250
25251
25252
25253
25254
25255
·~ . 25256
25257
25258
25259
25260
25261
25262
25263
25264
25265
25266
25267 -268 ~269
25270
25271
25272
25273
·25274
25275
·25276
25277
25278
25279
.25280
25281
25282·
25283
25284
25285
25286
25287
25288
25289
25290
25291
25292
-293 ~294
.JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Alex Fi'sh Company, Ec9logical Research $
All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings, Couplings & Belts
Alpine Aromatics,. Inc., Odor Control
Aljac Supply Co., Pipe Supplies
American ~ckflow Co., Valve Parts
American Soil Company, Lateral Repair
Amoco Reinforced Plastics Co.,.Freight
City of Anaheim, Power
The Anchor Packing Co., Gaskets
.AMSA, Conference Registration
Bancroft-Whitney Co., Government Codes
Banning Battery Company, Batteries
Barnes & Delaney, Conveyor Repair
Bearing Specialty Company, Bearings
Bell Pipe & Supply Company, Controls & Switches
Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair
Don Bogart, Employee Mileage
Broadlicks Art Supply, Drafting Supplies
CS Company, Valves & Freight
Cal's Cameras, Photo Supplies & Processing
Coast Insurance Agency, Insurance Premium ..
Coast Towing, Towing
Compressor Service, Compressor Parts
Consolidated Electrical Distbrs., Electrical ·supplies
Constructor's Supply Co., Hardware .
Costa Mesa County Water District, Water
Crest Leasing, Vehicle Lease .
Culligan Deionized Water Service, !4b Supplies
Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage
Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., ·Lab Supplies
N. A. D'Arcy Company, Freight
C. R. Davis Supply Co., Hardware
Deaver Manufacturing Co., Equipment Repair
John M. Deck Co., Equipment Parts ·
De Guelle & Sons Glass Co., Glass
Department of General Services, Technical Manuals
Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling
Dodge Truck, Inc., Truck Parts
Ida L. Duesberg, Employee Mileage
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies & Pr~nting
Ecco Equipment Corp., Equipment Rental·
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring
Enterprise Printing Company, Cover Stock
Fischer & Porter Company, Pump Parts & Strip Charts
William Fox, Employee Mileage
GAF Corporation, Copier Repair
Gasket Manufacturing Co., Inc., Gaskets
General Electric Supply, Electric Supplies
General Installation Co., Water Heater
Georgia.Pacific Corp., Chlorine Contract 1-1-75
General Telephone Company of Calif.
Cindy Gete·r, Employee Mileage
I-1
AMOUNT
159.00
423.59
1,060.00
178.61
251.77
675.00
141.40
56.64
71.02
100.00
45.82
156.62
·193.33
448.24
230.44
38.00
21.00
17.74
531.35
315.98
59.00
35.00
72.95
1,252.72
193.79 6.oo
147.28
80.00-
25.38
.529.05
6.06
81.41
95.40
63.44
181.99
12.72
·428.25
82.19
7.80
135.12
820~00
3,000.00
. 69.91
2,438.58
23.70
214.67
158.18
533.30
64.91
6,326.30
3,111.77
33.90
WARRANT NO.
25295
25296
25297
25298
25299
25300
25301
25302
25303
25304
25305
25306
25307
25308
25309
-. I 25310
25311 . 25312
25313
25314
25315
25316
25317
25318
25319
25320
25321
25322
25323
25324
25325
25326
25327
25328
25329
.25330
25331
25332
25333
25334
·25335
25336.
25337
25338
25339
25340
25341
25342
253113
25344
25345
25346
·25347
25348
25349
IN FAVOR OF
. .
Graybar Electric Co., Electric Supplies $
Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Parts
Hadley's ~rinting, Printing ·
George T. Hall Co., Pump Parts
Halsted & Hoggan, Pump
Harbor Fire Protections, Inc., Fire Extinguisher Service
Harrington Industrial Plastics, Pipe Supplies
Harrisons & Crosfield, Freight
Hasty Lawn & Ga.rden, ·Mower
L. Heitman Equipment Co., Inc.; Equipment Rental
Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease
Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires
·Honeywell, Inc., Strip Charts
Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies, Tools & Hardware
City of Huntington Beach, Water
Huntington Bea.en Equipment Rental, Equipment Rental
Inland Nut & Bolt·Company, Hardware
Irvine Ranch Water District, Water
Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supplies
King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, Bushings & Pipe Supplies
Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies
Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware & Tools
LBWS, Inc., -Welding Supplies, Hardware & Tools
L & N Uniforms Supply Co., Uniform.Service·
The La.cal Company, Inc., Pump Packing
Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Equipment Parts··
R. H. Landin Graphics, Printing
Jim Lankford Company, Adapter
Larsen-Hogue, Equipment Testing
Judy Lee, Employee Mileage
McKesson Chemical Co., JPL Chemical~
McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Hardware
Majestic Fasteners Company, Hardware
Marden Susco, Tools
Meter Master, Inc., Equipment Repair
Charles Meriam Company, Metering Supplies
E. B. Moritz Foundry., Manhole Rings & Covers
Morrison Company, Pipe Supplies
J. Mosher, Employee Mileage
N B Products, .Pipe Supplies
National Auto Glass, Truck Parts
National Lumber Supply, Building Materials
Newark Electronics, Tools
City of Newport Beach, Water c. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel Fees
Oakite Products, Inc., Cleaner
Orange Coast Hardwood, Building Materials
Orange Valve & Fitting Co., Hardware
Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies
Pacific Engineers, Piping
Pacific Pipe Tool Co., Ladders
Pacific Pumping Company, Pump Parts
Pacific Telephone Company
Parkwood Western Distribution, Hardware
M. C. Patten Corporation, Controls ·
I-2
AMOUNT
342.80
102.22
24.9~
69.8~-
725.49
103.71
37It.29
42.18
45.50
594.oo
429.08
118.95
40.19
526. 29
. 14.40
407.87
35.99
1.75
729.57
1,085.66
884.56
434.50
130.32
1,574.60
479.17
1.34
301.04
.23.3r
178. 5.9-"
28.26
818.06
79.15
39.23
42.87
72.12
156.76
186.45
106.93
28.62
"969. 79
77.33
30.63
234.·94
672.08
2,079.90
. 139-92
112.02
96.68
316.67
834.60
706.07
79.23
344.4~ 63.0,-
140.01
WARRANT NO.
25350
25351
>352
~353
25354
25355
25356
25357
25358
25359
25360
25361
25362
25363
25364
25366
-25367
25368
25369
25370
25371
25372
25373
25374
25375
25376
>377 ~378
25379
25380
25381
25382
·25383
25384
·25385
25386'
25387
25388
25389
25390
25391
25392
25393
25~07
25395
25396
25397
25398
25399
25400
25401
)402
~403
25404
IN FAVOR OF
Postmaster, Postage
Preston We~d Control, Weed Killer
Rainbow· Disposal Company, Trash Disposal
Terry Ramey," Employee Mileage
. $
The Register, Subscription Renewal
Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Aluminum
Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts & Freight
Ruff's Saw Service, Saw Sharpening
SGA Scientific, Inc.; Lab Supplies
Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing
Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Testing Supplies
Saylor's Art & Engineering Supplies, Drafting Supplies
Science Applications, Inc., Hazardous Waste Study
Scientific Products, Lab Supplies
Service Motor Parts, Engine Repair.
Sherwin Electric Service, Equipment Testing
Sherwin Williams'co., Paint Supplies
John Sigler, Employee Mileage
Signal-Flash Company, Barricade Rental
Fred Sinasek, Employee Mileage
Skil Corporation, Equipment Parts
Smart & Final Iris Co., Supplies
Southern California Edison Company
South Orange Supply, Piping Supplies
Southern California Gas Company
Southern California Water Company
Sparkletts Drinking Water c·orp., Bo-ctled Water
Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts .
Standard Oil Company of Calif.~ Gasoline & Oil
Sterling Art & Engineering Supply, ~rafting Supplies
Sun Electric Corporation, Equipment Repair
Sunnen Products Co., Equipment Parts
T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Parts
Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage
Technical Book Company, Technic~l Manuals
Thomason Compressor ·Corp., Compressor Repair
Margo Thomson, Employee Mileage
Tustin Water Works, Water
Union Oil Company of Calif., Gasoline
United Auto Parts, Truck Parts
United Parcel Service, Freight-Out
United Reprographics, Inc., Printing .
United States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts
Utilities Supply Company, Tools & Fire Extinguishers
Patrick Vail, Employee Mileage
Valvate Associates, Pump Parts
Wall Street Journal, Subscription
Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage
Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage
John R. Waples, R. s., Odor Consultant
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine ~arts
Whitney's Speedometer Service, Truck Repair
World Travel Bureau, Inc., JPL Air Far~
Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing
I-3
AMOUNT
500.00
353.78
62.00
59.10
42.00
1,196.42
2,013.59 .
69.68
41.50
61.48
40.76
12.50
1,000.00
242.55
.242. 34
357.50
838.38
7.20
26.00
9.00
36.17
23.09
1,137.04
64.94
.1,701.89
3.00
100.05
451.70
8,504.90-
26.08
. 74. 79
134.63
118.83
46.62
26.66
70.00
7.50
35.16
107.42
299.40
14.52
66;62
1,666.71
558.57
25.86
140.89
37.96
27.30
47.10
220.80
931.51
7.63
368.73
2,233.41
WARRANT NO.
25405
25406
25224
25225
25226
25227
25228
25229
25230.
25231
25232
25233
,_. 25234
25235
25236
25237
25238
25239
25240
25241
25242
IN FAVOR OF
Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Service
Zodiac Paper Company, Reproduction Supplies
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING Fmm WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
All Bearing Service, Inc., .Tools
John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services
Clar~ Equipment Co., Forklift, A-076
County Sanitation Dist. 2 of L.A., Solids Study
Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16 ·
E.T.I. & Kordick, Retention Contract I-8-3
Forkert Engineering, Survey Pl-1.6
Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Mgmt. Pl-16
Industrial Indemnity Co., Contractor P2-20
Motorola, Inc., Communication Equipment
Perkin Elmer Corp., Freight
Porter Boiler Service, Inc., Contractor PW-035
Pyramid Fence Co., Contractor PW-039 ·
Southern Calif. Testing Lab, Testing Pl-16
Spectra-Physics, Lab Equipment
Tatkin Company, Mete~ing Equipment
Testing Engineers, Inc., Testing Pl-16
J. G. Tucker & Son, .Inc., Safety Equipment
Twining Laboratories, Testing Pl-16
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF
I-4
$
$
$
AMOUNT
1,320.55
85.52
~ 71, 583_. 59
141. 90
20,134.13
9,450.96
25,000.00
1,234,869.80
79,613.73
1,841.50
11,397.00
8,956.52
1,579.40
30.52
33,815.70
3;076.35
196.20
5,459~00
382.66
1:,599.0~
763.2~
679.05
·$1,438, 986. 62
$1,510,570.21
DISTRICT NO. 2
Vb.rlRANT NO.
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
25207
25208
25209
25210
25211
25212
25213
25214
25·215
25216
2r"l7
~
25218
25219
25407A
25220
Cou~ty of Orange, Compaction Testing 2-lt-2 & 2-18
Mark Dakovich, Inc., Contractor 2-17-2
J. Putnam Henck, Contractor 2-15
Kasler Corporation & L.H. Woods & Sons, Contractor 2-14~2
Lowry a.nd Associates, Engineering Services 2-14-2 2-14-3
6 8 '. ' 2-1 -1, 2-17-2, & 2-1
SAWPA, Grant Payment 2-14-2
S. S. Zarubica, Contractor 2-18.
DISTRICT NO. 3
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 3~18,
3-20-1, 3-21-1, & 3-21-2
County. of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-18 & 3-19 ·
Mike Prlich & Sons, Contractor 3-19
South.ern California Testing Laboratory, Soils Testing
3-19
Sully-Miller Contracting.Company, Contractor 3-20-1
A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Saliba, Contractor 3-18
A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Sa:liba, Contractor 3-18
City of Westminster, Facility Relocation 3-18
II
AMOUNT
$ 266.10
"140' 797. 80
28,389.48
178,021.00
28,602.55
83,800.00
256,573.63
$ 716,450.56
10,494.50
340.08
52,748.oo
261.72
30,240.00
198,930.50
32,000.00
7,250.00
$ 332,264.80
WARRANT NO.
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
25221 Don Koll Company, Refund Invoice Overpayment
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
25222 Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 7:...6-7
25223 McGuire Construction, Inc., Contractor 7-6-6
III
$
AMOLv
37.11
$ 37-:Ll
$ 2,256.00
3,375.00
$ 5,631.00
~ -Age~~a I.tern No. 3 ~
S T A . F F R E P 0 R T
March 5, 1975
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
. of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVE NU E
FOUNTAIN VALLEY , CALIFORNIA 9 2 708
(714) 5-40-2910
(714) 962-241 I
THE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR, REACHES III AND IV -CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3
Pursuant to the instructions of the Board of Directors ·of County Sanitation
District No. 2, the staff did contact the affected cities and county agencies
regarding the design and alignment of that portion of the Santa Ana River
Interceptor from the intersection of La Palma and Grove Streets to the Orange
County boundary, to serve the upper basin area as well as those portions
within Orange County either presently within or outside of the ~anitation
District's boundaries. The staff did present before the Ci~y Councils of
Yorba Linda and Placentia, as well as meet with the staff of the Orange County
Planning Department and appea~ before the Planning Commission, to present
the concept as indicated in the Project Report for this project.
As a result of the interfacing between the Sanitation District's staff and
those affected agencies, the following is a summary of the results and actions
of said respective affected agencies:
1. A report was presented to the City of Anaheim and on November .26,
1974, the City Council did adopt Resolution No. 74-R-598, .which
stipulated that the proposed Santa Ana Regional Interceptor may
interfere with the air quality" standards, but found it was
necessary to solve the critical water quality problem. Attached
is a copy of said. resolution (Exhibit A)".
2. On October 15, 1974, the general manager and chief engineer
appeared before a special study session of the City Council of
the City of Yorba Linda wherein the design concepts of the
interceptor were presented . As of this.date, the Sanitation
District has not received any formal action taken by the City of
Yorba Linda regarding this matter.
3. Staff reports and the consulting engineer's preliminary design
report were submitted to the Yorba Linda County Water District
one of the sewering agencies in the drainage area, which they
have reviewed and concur with the design triteria ai established
in the staff report on Sept.ember 26th (Exhibit B).
·4. On November 6, 1974, the chief engineer and consulting engineer
appeared before the City Council bf the City of Pl.acentia at a
special study session preceding their regular Council meeting,
wherein the design concepts were presented. On February 18, 1975,
the city engineer presented a staff report to the City Council
which recommended the capacities and the design criteria as
established,which recommendation was sustained by the City Council.·
(Exhibit C).
5. On November 4, 1974, the general manager and chief engineer appeared
before the Planning Commission of the County of Orange wherein the
design concepts, as well as the alignments and impacts associated
with this project were presented to the ·commission. In subsequent
meetings with the staff of the Planning Department, the Planning
Commission has recommended the adoption of a resolution of the
Board of Supervisors to be considered at their regu~ar Board Meeting
of March 11th. A copy of Mr. Osborne's letter to the Board of
Supervisors is attached herewith (Exhibit D)
6. On March ' 3rd, the Distr.ict received a -de.Clara ti on from Mr.· ·Paul DeFalco ;·
Regional Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, which
stated that an Environmental Impact Statement, sometimes required
by the Environmental Protection Agency for funded projects, is not
required. (Exhibit E)
7. The District's consulting engineer and chief engineer have met with
the two major private property owners and have discussed the align-
ment of the interceptor through their property. Both property owners
have reviewed the proposed alignments and do concur with those
alignments presently.developed. (Exhibits F, G and H).
The staff and consulting engineer are in agreement that the design criteria as
established and set forth in the memorandum of September 19, 1974 regarding the
capacities and the design criteria for this project, should be considered and ·
acted upon by the Board as soon as possible. The staff is desirous of
presenting to the State and Environmental Protection Agency the project plans,
·specifications and accompanying design criteria on or before· April 1st of this
year, in order that approvals can be obtained before tJ;i.~. end of this fiscal
year (June 30, 1975). The recommendatlons as cont~ine'd in .said staff report of
September 19, 1974 have been reviewed in great detail and it is the opinion of
the undersigned that they should be approved and adopted by the Board of
Directors of District No. 2.
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority did, on March 5, 1975, receive a letter
from the State Water Resources Control Board giving concept approval of the
project from La Palma and Grove Streets through the County boundary and through
Prado Dam to the northerly terminus of Projects 4B and 4C, which concept approval
was predicated upon the Project Report submitted March 1, 1974.
REL:hje
CITY OF ANAllEl\t, CALIFORNIA
Office 0£ City Clerk
December 27, 1974
"":..
Fred A. Harper, G·eneral Manager
County Sanitation Districts
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Dear Mr.· Harper:':• ..
. FILED
In tne Office of the S c cr<?ta'ry
Coun"'ty Sanitation District
No ··--
JAM 8 1975
Forwarded for your records is a certified copy of Reso-
lution No. 74R-587, duly passed and adopted by the Anaheim
City Council at their regular meeting held November 26,
1974, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
FINDING THAT THE PRpPOSED SANTA .ANA.REGIONAL INTERCEPTOR
MAY INTERFERE WITH AIR QUALITY STAND ARDS, BUT IS NECES-
SARY. TO SOLVE A CRITICAL WATER QUAL.ITY PROBLEM AND RECOG-
NIZING THAT LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION RESTRICTIONS MAY
BE NECESSARY TO MEET AIR QUALITY s1ANDARDS.
st
Enclosure
cc: Public Works Director
City Engineer
Very .truly yours,
CITY OF ANAHEIM
-. ·0:.:..--, ..... "-~.??. ,)_~....,_,, ;-:~·:.,..0
ALONA Me HOUGARD, CITY CLERK
P. 0. Box 3222, Anaheim, California 92803
EXHIBIT A -Page 1 of 3
a
. __i
RESOLUTION NO. 74R-SB7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED SANTA AHA
REGIONAL INTERCEPTOR MAY INTERFLRE WITH 1-.IR
QUALITY STANDARDS, BUT IS NECESSARY TO SOLVE
A CRITICAL WATER QUALITY PROOLEl1 AHD JIBCOGlH Z-
ING THAT LAND USE 1\ND TR.l\NSPORTATIOU RESTnIC-
TIONS MAY BE NECESSARY TO MEET AIR QUALITY
STANDARDS.
WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange
County, in cooperation with the Santa Ana Watershed Project
Authority, is constructing the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor7
and ·
WiIEREhS, it is the intent of this Interceptor ·to
prevent a degrading of the groundwater supply of Orange County1
and
WHEREAS, it is necessary as a result of the construc-
tion of this Interceptor for the City Council of the City of
Ana~eim to make a finding that this project may interfere witP.
the att~inment or maintenance of air quality standards, but
. the project is needed to solve a cri.tical water g m1li ty probler.!7
and the City Conncil does recogniz·e that land use and transport<·-
tion restrictions may have to be ir.1plementec1 to meet air quality
standards1 and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of lrnaheirn find ~:
it in the best interests of the City to make said finding •
.. .,NQF, TH~REFOIU:, BE IT RES~LVEf? by the City Cow1cil of
: . ,:·t~e ::c.tty;. 'o~: .i\naheim that the City Council recognizes that th~ (~ ~; ,<constrUctio:i::of the Santa Jl..na Regional Interceptor may interfe::rc·
l'-~.. with the at'tttinrnent and maintenance . of air quality s tandnrcis,
·· b~t ~he ·p:r:oject is neE:ded, to sol vo n critical water qunli t:.'
problem, -and that 1f t is recognized that lnnd u:::c and tr;:mr;µcrt;~~·
tion restrictiqns may have to be implemented to meet 01ir auc.li t-,
... ,~tandards. ·: · --
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is a9proved and si~n~d by :r:·;:.:
this 26th day of November, 197.\..
ATTES'l':
l ( r ...
crN CLERK oFTHE ~ITY or Am1.HEIH
EXHIBIT A -Page 2 of 3
FAL1 jh ..
....
';
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEill )
I, ALONA M. HOU GARD, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 74 R-587 w~s passed
and adopted at a regular me e ting of the City Council held on the
26th day of ilov e lilber, 1974 1 by the following vote of the members
thereof ;
AYES; COUNCIL ~ERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas
and Tho m
NOES; COUNCIL MEMBERS : ifane
ABSENT: . COUNCIL ME?-IB ERS: Uone
· Ju~D I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim
approved and signed said Re solution No. 74R-5 5 7 on t he 26th day of
t;ovember-. 1974.
IN WITNESS WHERE OF, I have hereunto set QY hand and affixed
the seal of the City of Anaheim this 26 t h day of November, 1974.
CITY CLERK OF THE CirY OF ANAHEill
(SEAL)
.... .'
I •
ITT~Yt/~~@<;;i;.~i
v. .. , 'lJ ...
ff·•~-,,·~:.:::. '.:.r~~:\:~== ."" , -~;:
.\,; .. :;;: .:··. ~~_.=~ .... · .. .; ·,.;
THE FO RE GOING INSTRUMENT IS A FULL TRU E AN D
~~:l ~~~:T~~:;:.~~~~--;i~ l~;~s
ALONA M. HOUGARD, CITY CLEllX OF THE C'T Y •. :·. ,: ::.:;.;:;
A o JS; :/ ' I_ ' ' • .~ "''
BY c{;a:...cR.._~-------•···~ ..................... ..
Ofi..:•J ·. :: t.::..:"
. EXHIBIT A -Pa g e 3 of 3
YORBA LINDA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
AREA° COD E 714 PHONE 52ll 722& '41>22 PLUMOSA DRIVE
MAIL.ING ADDRESS
DRAWER F YORBA LINDA, CALIFORNIA 9266 G
. September 18, 1914
OFFICERS
R. 0. HASTINGS
PACSIOt:NT
RALPH C. S HOOK
GENERAL MA N A G£R
FRED CLODT
VIC£ PRES I O E NT
JEAN E . MATHEW S
5ECRl:T ARY
GORDON PETER SON
AUD_ITOH
Orange County Sanitation District No. 2
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, Ca l ifo rnia 9270 8
DIRECTORS
R . D. H A S T IN GS M E RWIN WAG N F.H
FRED CLOQT M . R OY K NA UFT . .J R
H O W A R D LIN DOW
.Attention: Mr . Fre d A. Harp er, G.ene.ral Ma nag er
Re: Capa~ity of Sant a An a Riv e r Int e rc e ptor
Gentlemen:
T~e Board of Directors of the Yorba Linda County Water
District has reviewe d the O.C.S.D. No . 2 ·staff _ report
dated Sept'ember 2 6, 1 9 7 4 . The Board re-c o mmends t h at
you adopt the d esig n c rite ria at the 0.6 5 depth capacity
with th e 3 9 11 -5 1" l i ne s i ze s as outlin ed i n the repor t .·
This lin e i s b a dly need e d n ot only . to prov i de r e l i ef
. o f exi s ting p ro bl ems b u t a s a t ool t o i mprov e the poor
water qua l ity of the upp er por t i on ·of th~ l ower San ta
Ana Riv e r Gr o u n d Wat er Basin . T h e Yo r ba Linda County
Water Di strict would apprec i ate whatever ·you can do to
exped i te t h e comp l etion of t hi s ve r y importa n t l ine .
RC S: jm
Ve ry truly yours ,
Ra l p h C. S h oo k
Ge n era l Ma n ager
·-
by -'.
J ean E. Mathew s
S ecr e tary
EXHIBIT B
TIN hop~ Are The City
Mey or Councll~n
ROBERT B. LYONS
City Administrator
EDWIN T. POWELL
MICHAEL J . CALLAHAN
L. JACK GOMEZ
ROBERT P. LANGER
GEORGE ·F. DeJESUS
401 East Chapman Avenue -Placentia, California 92670
·Mr. Ray Lewis
Chief Engineer
February 24, 1975
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF CAPACITY AND DESIGN CONCEPT
REACH III -SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER
Dear Ray:
Pursuant to the request via Don Martinson of .Lowry & Associates
the City Council acted.February -18, 1975, to approve in
concept the E-0 Projection of Population Growth for sewer
.....,, capacity requirements .and the proposed sewer design criteria
as advanced in your memo to Fred Harper dated September 19,
1974. It was our staff opinion, concurred by the City Council,
that the criteria for sewer capacity and sewer design as
proposed by the District is realistic and in con.formance with
good practice.
truly,·
' 7~-_.~~
Ben Minamide, P. E.
City Engineer
BM/cs
cc:· Director , Community Development
Engineering Division
EXHIBIT C -Page 1 of 10
-.
M E M 0 R A N D U M
TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -ENGINEERING DIVISION
DATE: FEBRUARY 11 , 1975
SUBJECT: SANTA /\NA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER -REQUEST BY
ORANGE COU NTY SANITATION DISTRICT TO APPROVE
CAPACITY AND DESI GN CONCEPT
FOR: CITY COUNCIL MEETING -FEBRUARY 18, 1975
ENGINEER'S REPORT NO. 75-23
ABSTRACT:
The Orange County Sanitation District is preparing to embark on the Phase
II I reach of the subject sewer which will provi_de sewer capacity for a.)
the S anta Ana Canyon area in Orange County and b .) the Upper Wate rsh ed ,
in Riverside and San· Bern."'lrdino Counties·. They requ es t the City Council 's
approval of 1.) concept determining s e wer capacity requirements and 2.)
sewer d e sign c rite ria.
DISCUSSION:
Because of upper watershed d e velopment in Rivers ide and San Bernardino
Counties and resultant urbanization, wastewater has been discharged into
.the Santa Ana River o r permitted· to percolate into groundwater basin s
unde rlying the valle y lands .
As a result Qf possible damage to the area 's water resources through highly
mineralized wa stes , a joint powers planning agency wa s fo rmed ~mong:
San Be rnardino Valley Minicipal Water Djstrict.
Western Municipa l Water Di stri.ct .
Chino Basin Mu nicipal Wa ter Di strict .
Orange County Water District.
The joint powers agency is called the Santa,Ana Watershe d Planning
Agency .
One of the highe s t priority projects for this Planning Agen cy was for
the e xport of hig hly mineralized water produced· in the Upper Watershe d to
the ocean by pipeline via the existing and propose d facilities of the
Co unty San itation Districts of Orange County . l\t the same t ime, it wa s
fe lt that the most cost P.ffect ive <1pp roach to s ewering the Santa Ana
Ca nyo n a r ea of Orange County would be for the Sanitation Di s trict to
provide ove r sizing to the same line .
·P RO.JE<;:T CAPACITY:
I n .1 detailed project report to the Santa Ana Wat erGh ed Authority dated
F e brua ry , 1974, Lowry & Associates point out that the capacity to be
provided f or the Santa Ana Canyo n Orange Cou nty area ct•uld vary widely
. dcpr:nding on the amount of urban growth that i ~ p r ojected. Six
_al t nrnati ve population projections were studied .
Configuration A -This projection ass\l!l\e S Santa Ana Ca nyon would
develop in accordance wi t h existing general plans and land use
pol icies now practiced by the affected Cities and the County.
Configuration B -This projection was based on twice the density of
Configuration A.
FEB 1 1 1975
. '~~ND~ ITEM No;,_-4-t::::.:r=·==
EXHIBIT C -Page 2 of 10
l
Engineer 's RepoI lo. 75-23
Febr ~a ry 1 1, 1975
Santa Ana River Interc eptor Sewer-Re quest by Orange Co u n ty Sanitatio n
District to .O.pprove ·Capacity and Des ign Concept
Configuration C -Thi s projection was based on one-hal f (~) the
d e nsi ty of Configuration B.
Configuration D -Thi s p r oj e cti on u s es the same development d e n si ty
a s A, but at an accel a ted rate .
Configura tio n E -This assumes all land p r esent l y classi fied as
"open spac e -con se rvatio n " in ex i sting l and use plans wou ld rema i n
in t hat catagor y and no t undergo a ~y future urban d e vel o pment .
E-0 Proj e ction -This projec tion i s based on a l o w fe r t i l i ty r a t e
that woul d r e pro duce e xisting population l e ve ls and no in-mi gr ati on
t o the State of Cal ifornia. However , the p r ojection does provide for
ant icipated sh ifts o f pop u lation within the State. The pro j ections
are mad e by app l y ing growth rate factors t o the 1970 census d ata .
Cl e an ;o;ate r Gr ant Progr am s r equire u se of t his proj e ction f or g r ant
applic a t ions .
The Sanitatio n District feels that t he E-0 Pro jection is t h e most v i a ble
altern ative a nd i t will r esult in substantially the same s i ze p r oject
as Configuration E .
OF.S IGN CRITERI A:
Pipe flow and s izing must be based on sound e ng ineering p r acti c e . The
standard d esign c r i t e ria o f t h e County Sanitatio n Dist r ict a re:
P i pe Roug hness Co effic i e nt
Design De pth of F low
F l o w Ra te·
Velocity
Manhole S pac ing
Mannings " n=O .13
0 .6 t o 0 .7 Dia meter
100 ga]-/c apita _per cl a y .
p l u s Comme r c ial /I nd ustrial
f l ow
·2.0 ft/sec . min."
1000 ft. max i mum
Of mos t c oncern i s the c ri teria of de s lgn fo r dept h of flow in a pipe .
By d es i g ning for a pipe r u nn ing say O. 6 (or 6 0'lfl; of pipe diamete r you
would n a t u ral ly have l ess c apacity than in d esigning fo r a g i v en p i pe
running f ul l. Ge n e r a l practi c e is to desi g n pip e s t wenty-four inches ( :!4 " l
o r l ess t o run ha lf f u ll a nd larger pipes t o r un a maximum of 0 .7 (or 70%)
o f pipe d i a meter. It i s staffs fee ling t hat no sewer should be de s i g ned
to run full . A ma rgi n f or peak f l ows and oxygen aeration wi t h in the pipe
shou ld b e prov i ded.. I n addi tion , t hi s will p r ovide a "margin of sa fe ty "
in the e vent t he E-0 popul at i o n is e xceed e d .
STAF F CO NCLUSIO N:
Staff f eel s tha t the cr i teri a prop osed b y t he Sanit a t i on Distr i c t on
both Project.Capacity and Desi gn Criteria f or the Santa Ana Canyon Ar ea
hav e been we ll thought out and reasonably conclud ed . We concur with the
c o s t e ffe ctive a ppr oach of p rovid i ng ·capacity f o r t he Santa Ana Can yon
joint ly wi th sewer i ng t he Uppe r Wa t e r s h ed i n Riverside and San Berna rdino
Co unti es .
A copy o f Ch ief Engin e e r , Ray Lewi s ' me mo t o Ge neral Manager , F red Ha r per
of the Sanitati on District , d a ted Se ptember 19 , 1 974, is attached a nd we
have a s k ed Do n Mart i n s on o f Lowr y and Assoc i a tes , Consul tant Project
Eng i neers , to be p resent atthe Februa ry 18 , 1 97 5 , Ci t y Co unc il Meeti ng
to ans wer any par ticular q u e stions .
RECOMMENDATI ON:
That 'th e Ci ty Co u nci l approve i n c oncept by minute o rder both t h e c apac i t i e s and
design c r i t e r i a as pro posed by t he Distric t f or Rea c h I II , Santa An a
Rive r Interceptor sewe r.
EXH I BIT C -Page 3 of 10
.. i
j
I
."[
Engineer's Report No '5-23
February 11, 1975
Santa Ana River Intercaptor Sewer-Request by Orange County County sanitation
District to .Approve Capaoity and Design Concept
~v.'{~~
Community Development
BM/TFN/cs
Attached: Memo of September 19, 1974-Letter to City Engineer from Donald
Martinson, Lowry & Associates
cc: Ray Lewis,.Orange County Sanitation District
Don Martinson,·Lowry & Associates
EXHIBIT C -Page 4 of 10
a
..
· 121 Gaj/ U},H/.if!.glon Avenue, San/a ".Ana , Cah/omia 92701 (714) 5 41-5301
February 4, 1975
Mr. Ben Minamide
City Engineer
CITY OF PLACENTIA
401 East Chapman
Placentia, California
COMM. DEV.
r ,... 15 .. . , ,.,~.-
1. • ' • ::! I '.J I I .
-ENGINEERING
Subject: Capacities and Design Criteria for Santa Ana
River Interceptor Sewer
Dear Mr. Minamide:
In accordance with our conversation yesterday; transmitted herewith is
the Memorandum from Ray Lewis, Chief En g ineer of the County Sanitation
District, in regard to the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer. Th e
Memorandum spells out in detail our proposal for th e capacities and de-
sign criteria for the next reach o~ the sewer proj e ct.
Also enclosed is a copy of our Project Report .which was submitte d to
the State Water Resources Control Board as a ;equirement for ob taining
a Federal and State grant for the project. Section X of the Re port deals
with a portion of the project in Orange County. Th e reac hes shown on
Figures IV-A and IV-B in Section X of the Report corres pond t o the reach
numbers as shown in Ray Lewis's memo •.
Wh~t i~ n~~Qed .a~_J:l:ti~-1?..Q.int in t~m~_i.~ _;?,n a~tJ._'2.I!.. . .!?y __ t;_4~ City Council
of ~~~cent1a._ appXQY~~g_:;~_g_~l!~r C!J_c_q_l}~.ept th ~.Q_a_c;;i..t_;i.~s _?_D._~ __ d_es i_&!l
crite~~~ as proposed in the Project Report ~ng a s f urthe r e xp l a ined
by the ~eino of Ray Lewis.
The City of Anaheim has already taken· action in improving this concept,
and the Sanitation District will be sending a copy of their action
directly to you.
After you have had a chance to review this material, I would b e g lad
to meet with you to further explain it to you if you so desire .
Very truly yours,
LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES
t~~i'/'4~~4///l--
DONALD ·7. ~T-INSON
DJM:rtk
EXHIBIT C Page 5 of 10
Enclosures
10963 SAN DIEGO M ISSION ROAD, SAN O I EG~, CALIFO RNIA 9 2 10 8 ..
•
NEMO TO: FRED A. HARPER 9-19-74
FROM:
SUBJECT:
RAY LEWIS, Chief Engineer
Capaciti e s and De s ign Criteria .for Santa Ana River Interceptor
La Palma and Grove Streets to Orange County Boundary
In the design of the· Santa Ana River Interceptor, Job No. 2-14-3, from the
intersection of La. Palma and Grove Streets to the Orange County .boundary, it is
my opinion that there are two major areas .for consideration:
1. The capacities which are to be provided for the underdeveloped
area in the Santa Ana Canyon
2. The design criteria to be .used in establishing the physical
size of the in~erceptor .
1be former, I feel, is a policy decision which must be established by the Board,
but the later should be based on sound engineering practices.
DESIGN CAPACITIES
On March 1st of this year, a project repqrt was submitted to the State Water
Resources Control Board and the Environmental Protection Ag~ncy wherein the staff
had presented certain capacities which we felt were consisten~ with the guidelines
established by the· State and EPA, but which also incorporated the general concensus
of the affected planning agencies. Basically, this interceptor sewer has been •
designed to accommodate two distinctive flows:
1. Flows from the upper basin which are 30 MGD from sources that are
presently degrading grotmdwate! supplied of Orange County and are a
part of the Basin Pl~n under consideration by the State and
Environmental Protection Agency. These flows are from the following
sources:
A. Existing industrial dischargers
(Includes Sunkist Lemon Products, Culligan,
Norton Air Force Base, ~o. California Edison)
B. Agricultural Waste
C. Extracted Grotmdwater
D. Temporary Municipal Wastes and Municipal Brines
TOTAL
5 MGD
9 MGD
11 MGD
S MGD
30 MGD
2. Projected Flows from the Santa Ana Car.yon are a within Or a n ge C o ~nty.
Th .is accumulated total has been estimated at 5 MGD and is based
upon the E-0 population projections tor this drainage are a.
EXHIBIT C -Page 6 of 10 ..
..........
E~o population projections have been developed by. the State -an~ Environmental Protec~ion Agency and are des.igneq as a
·series E f~rtility with a "0" net migration to California,
beginning July 1, 1971. The E-0 fertility rate has been
established by the Department of Finance for each County in
the .State. Orange County's Series E fertility is approximately
2 1/2 percent annual growth~ This must be compared to a
6 to 8 percent annual growth which the Districts have sustained
in the past two decades.
The E-0 growth population projections an.d design capacities associated.
therewith are compared below with the capacity requirements as proj,ected in
the District No. 2, 1972 Master Plan and the present zoning in the area.
CAPACITY REQUIREMENTS
(MGD)
REACH E-0 1972 MASTER PLAN PRESENT LAJ\TD USE ZONING -'74
2 5 36 25
3 3 26 16
4· 2 19 14
5 2 13 ' 8
6 0 2 1
7 0 0 0
8 0 0 0
The various reaches as indicated above are shown on the attached maps which were
included with the afo!ementioned project report.
DESIGN CRITERIA
Utilizing the design capacities as established by the E-0 population projections
as described above, the staff has presented to the State and Environmental Protection
Agency a design which, I feel, reflects sound engineering practices for this
interceptor which will extend from Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley eventually to the
City of San Bernardino, a distance of approximately 65 miles. I feel it is
essential that the design criteria reflect a safe operational mode for this sewer.
To design and ope.rate any sewer to flow full is contrary to sound engineering
practices. Any sewer must be able to "breathe" for ventilation purposes. Air is
normally drawn down into the sanitary sewer.'by the flow of sewage and a lso the
exchange of the air due to the rise and fall of the sewage. Manholes are vented
F.XIIIBJT c -Pal!e 7 of 10
to allow this process •. The principal reasons for ventilation are best described in
the-ASCE Manual of· Pr~ctices No . 37 which has been extracted and included herein :
1. -io remove ror satisfactory dis~osa1 any odorous air which may tend in some
p laces to cs.cape from the sewer.
2. To maintain as.ewer atmosphere which is not excessively depicted in oxygen.
In most sewers natural ventilation will keep oxygen above 90% of no r mal; but in
some very long sewers with little natural venti latio n . or in places whc;re the free
flow o f air is obstructed, lhe concen t ration may drop to less than half of no rmal.
Depletion of oxygen in the atmosphere reduces surface aeration of the sewage
str eam and may cause sulfide production.
3. To dry out walls of structures and reduce corrosion where sulfide.is present in
. t he sewage. This can he effective for protection of manholes, junction chambers. etc:,
b ut it is doubtful if any substantial' length of sewer can be dried cffect;vcly .
4. To reduce explosive atmospheres. Normally all flammable gases and liquids
are excluded by ordinances and the presence of the&e materials is an abnormal o~
acciden t al occurrence in sewers. This is not predictable and is not comm o n enough
to warrant forced ventilat io n of all the sewers but is an incidental advantage of. ven-
tilation where it is required for other reasons.
The de s ign as presented to the State and EPA is designed to accommodate the
E-0 flow with the sewer to flow at 0. 65 ·depth bf the internal. ·diameter of the pipe.
With this depth, a sewer will operate at a ?elf-cleaning velocity and provide
adequate ventilation for the operation thereof. endeniab l y, the sewer can be
operated at a greater depth to accormnodate flows in excess of the E-0 populati~n
pr ojections . The capacities which are prov.ided at subsequent fl ow depth · are
tabulated below:
ALTERNATE DEPTH CAPACITIES, MGD
REACH E-0 CAP. 0.65 DEPTIJ CAP. 0 .75 DEPTH CAP . ·o;85 DEPTH CAP .
2 35 35 .4() 52
3 33 '. 33 38 43
4 32 32 38 43
s 32 32 37 42
6 30 30 37 42
7 30 30 37 42
8 30 30 34 39
EXHIBIT C -Pag e 8 of 10
..
. ..
It must be kept in mind that in the design of any sew e r system, after the
flows and criterias have been established, the selection of the pipe size-is
~redicatcd upon the commercial sizes manufactured by the various pipe companies.
for comparison, there is only a six inch differential (39" v e rsus 33") in pipe
size to accommodate the E-0 population capacities and the present land use zone
capa~ities if the same· design criteria was appli ed to each respective capacity.
Sewer pipe is manufactured in 3" increments in sizes greater than 18".
Assuming that the design criteria was to provide for a pipe flowing ·full to
acconunodate the E-0 population (which would be contrary to sound engine ering
practices as indicated above) and the District had to _provid e for relie f capacities
at some future time in the event that E-0 pop~lation projections were exceeded o r
additional flows were necessary to accommodate discharges from the upper basin,
the District would be subject to a relief capacity cost of approximately $~ million
as compared to the $863,000 oversizing cost as shown on the cost s unnn ary below:
COST SUMMARY
Estimated Cost of Design Project (39"-51")
Estimated Cost of Grant Eligible Project (36"-.45")
Oversizing Cost
Sanitation District's share of Design Proj e ct.
Total Sanitation District's Cost
Cost of Project to Carry Total District
Capacity (24"-36")
$7,26 6 ,00 0
6,403,0 00
863,000
448,00 0
1,311,000
4,562,000
The staff and design e.ng ineer will have available additional map s a nd
exhibits to more fully explain th e de tails of the design a s r e comm e nd e d b y th e
sta ff to the State and Environmental Protection Agenc y .
EXHIBIT C -Pa ge 9 of. 10
~=~p~~
-.~ r :·. :-~-. ::-::
1 __
,,
J ,,,
~~ ..
.. ·.::.. ...... .} ___ ,(
: ; . --;: ... ' .
-I •; .' .. -1 ... .. -~~.
. ,. .. . ---., ... --~--?.7' . ' :
----------------------------------
EXHIBIT c -
.. ·":". J
flQURE 2
L OWRY a ASSOC I ATES ............... -""" .,,,.~.
•
L EGENO
EXISTING TRUNK FACILITIES ---PR OPOSED TRUNK FA CILITIES
DISTRICT BOUNDARY . --FACILIT IES UNOER CON STRUCTIC ~.
I . · -t SERVICE AR E A REACH m:
SANTA ~A WATER SH ED PROJEC.T AUTHORIT Y
.
I
; I . ~
--
PROJECT REPQ;H -SMHA ANA REGION AL 1 NTE~'-'Pr:: ~
GROV E STRE E T TO OR .1N GE COUN TY UN€
SERVICE A_REA
,.,.. ....... _
REACH liI
SANTA ANA REG IONAL JNTE RCEP'T OR
L!>""y • A 550CI A1'[S I P:C_e RU~~-~~~~··--· -·---
---. •. .--
' Page 10 of 10
MAR 1 J 1975 '·
C>F
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
AGENCY
400 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST
SANTA AHA, CALIFORNIA
TE LE PHONE: 834·2300
AREA CODE 714
MAll.IN(i, AODRC5S :
P. 0. BOX 4048
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702
H. G. OSBORNE
DIRECTOR FILE
. Board ot Supervisors
Administration Building
515 N. Sycamore
Santa Ana, California 92701 ·
SUBJECT: Santa Ana Regional Interceptor, Grove Street. to Orange County
Line; Air Quality Resolution (3rd and 4th Supervisorial Districts)
SYNOPSIS:
Gentlemen:
As part of federal grant requirements, the Sanitation Districts
of Orange County has requested that a finding be made by your
Honorable Board concerning the air quality im plications of the
Santa Ana Regional Interce ptor. The EMA and the .Planning
Commission have reviewed t his project and proposed the attached
resolution which indic ate s 1at the project may interfere with
the attainment or mainten a 2 of ai r quality standards, but the
project is needed to solve a critical water quality problem, and
that it is recognized that land use and transportation restrictions
may have to be implemented to meet air quality standards.
One of the necessary prerequisites to federal approval of grant funds for the Santa
Ana · Regional Interceptor, Grove Street to Orange County Line (Reach III) is a
resolution from the County of Orange concerning the air quality i mp lications of this
project. The Board of Supervisors has been asked by the project sponsor_, the County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County, to make one of the following findings:·
1. That the air quality implications of the project
have been reviewe d and that the growth associated
with the proj ect will not prevent the attainment
or maintenance of air quality standards, or
2. That the project may interfere with the attainment
or maintenance of air quality standards, but the
project is needed to solve a critical vrnter quality
problem, and that it is recogniz ed that land use
and transportation restrictions may have to be
implemente_d to meet air· quality standards.
E.XHIBIT D -Page 1 of 3
Page 2
.~ ..
. .
The Santa Ana Regional Interceptor, (SARI) has two basic functions. First, the
Regional \.later Quality Boa .rd has established a nondegradation policy for dissolved
minerals in the upper Santa Ana River watershed . Studies show that the only
effective method for achieving this is the removal of salts (brines) from the upper
basin. Thus, an interceptor with a capacity of 30 MGD, is proposed to transport
brines to thP. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County facilities in Fountain
Valley, for treatment and ocean disposal. An additional 5 MGD in capacity is pro-
posed for the Santa Ana Canyon Area (Reach III of the SARI) to handle domestic
waste~ there. The 35 -MGD capacity Santa Ana Regional Interceptor will join
the lower reaches (Reaches I and II) of the interceptor, portions of which al-
ready have been built under the state grants for clean water program. The in.ter-
~eptor parallels the Santa Ana River.
Due to the fact that this project is designed to provide for additional development
in Santa Ana Canyon, an area of high air pollution problems already, it must be
conclud~d that the project may interfere with the attainment and maiRtenance of
air quality standards. According to the County Air Pollution Control District,
there are certain inadequacies in th_e material submitted to the County by the
applicant which hinder an effective evaluation of the actual air quality impacts.
However even if more detailed information was submitted, it is extremely improbable
that :the conclusions reached would be any different from that expressed above.
On March 3, 1975 the Planning Commission approved and recommended to your
Honorable Board for adoption the attached resolution.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Reso 1 uti on .
Respectfully Submitted,
H. G. Osborne, Director
HGO:JLA:cc
Attachment .
EXHIBIT D -Page 2 of 3
..
"
PROPOSED RESOLUTION
.. .
Whereas the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County has proposed a project
designated the 11 Santa Ana Regional Interceptor, Reach III, and
Whereas this project provides for the beneficial removal of saline waters from
the .Santa Ana River Watershed and domestic wastes from the Santa Ana Canyon
Area, and
Whereas this project will provide for additional growth in the Santa Ana Canyon area
to the extent that such growth may interfer~ wtih the attainment and ·
maintenance of air quality standards,
Therefore be it resolved that the Orange County Board of Supervisors recognizes
that the project may interfere with the attainment or maintenance of air
quality standards, but the project is needed to solve a critical 111ater
quality problem, and that it is recognized that ·land use and transportation
restrictions may have to be implemented to meet .air· quality standards.
EXHIBIT ·D -Page 3 of 3
,
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL Pl\OTECTION AGENCY
REGION IX
100 C/-LIFORNIA STRl:.ET
SAN FRANCISCO. CALIFORNIA 94111
FEB 2 7 1975
To All Interested Agencies and Public Groups
Gentlemen:
In accordance vJith the procedures for the preparation of environmentcl
impcct state:nents, an environmental review has been performed on the pro-
posed Agency ac tion below:
Official Proj ect Name:
· Purpose of Project:
Applicant:
Location:
Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reaches III .& IV
To provide air economic;ol disposcl m2fr::Jd
for high-salinity waste::: that ',vould ct r~2n :ise
d egrade the ground 'Na ter of th2 U.pper S-:::-i ta.
Ana Basin
Santa ·A na Watershed Project Authority
;
In northeastern Orange County starti:;g a t tl:'..2
Grove Street-La Pill.ma Avenue intersection
and heading up the Santa Ana Canyon to
the San Bernardino County li ne , continuing
through the County north of the Sc.nta .2.~c. River
for approxl·ma .. elv LI QflQ fp.,,; .. to tho Pi·r.=,··-ir<o J ---~ .l -I -•--'-t. -..-.o..._'. .._i ~-_......,
County line, and continuir:ig in Ri'-'£rsice County
through the :P r a do Dam to t ermin ate . ap;:-!·o;d-
ma t e ly 2, 000 feet no:::th of th8 dam.
·Estimated Federal Financial Share: $5, 822 , 738 (F ebruary 197 11) . .
Estimuted State cmd Loccl Financial Share: $1, 94 0, 912 (February 197 ()
EXHIBIT E -Page 1 of 4
,
-2-
After performing an environmental review of the project, this Agency
has decided that an ·environmental impact statement is not required .
An ·environmental impact appraisal, which summari zes the review and
the reasons ·why a statement is not required, is on file at t he above office c:i.nd
is available for the public scrutiny upon request.
Sinc;erely,
)· .
. "/ . ···1· .. . . ' . i / .
' .t ·' • ... ~ ,,-, I
. ' ' • ' '",/ ',/I ~ I ',_,( ;J..-( _{....._, . .'/ ·'
. -....·-·. ~ ··/
P 1 De Falco, Jr. ; ·
yegional Administrator ;
/
\.
EXHIBIT E -Page 2 of 4
.. .'r
,
California Distribution List
1. State Water Resources Control Board
Division o~ Water Quality Control
1416 Ninth Stree t
S_acramento CA 95814
2 . Office of Int~rgovernmental · Management
State Clearinghou se
1400 Tenth Stree t, Room 108
Sacramento CA 95814
3. Environmenta l Protection Agency, Washington DC 20460
Office of Fed eral Ac tiv ities
Office of Public Affa irs
Office of Wa t er Programs , Planning & Inter agency
Program Division
Office of Congressional Affairs
Office of Congressional & Inte rgovernmental
Relations, Region IX
4. . Southern California Association of Go vernments
.1111 West Sixth Street, #40 1
Los Angeles CA 90017
5. State of California Air Reso.urces i3oard
Attention: Bill Lockett
6.
7 .
8.
1709 -11th Street
Sacramento C."Di. 95814
Orange County Sanitation Di~trict
Attentio n: Fred Harpe r
P .0 . Box 8127
Fountciin ·Valley CA 92708
Santa Ana Watershed Project Autho rity
Attention: Robe rt rvioore
7150 Brockton Ave nue
Riverside CA 92505
Howard And e rso n
4465 Nin t h Stree t
R i verside CA 92501 .
EXHIBI T E -Page 3 of 4
'
-2-
9. Environmental Improvement Agenc y
Attention: James DeAguilera
County of San Bernardino
316 l111ountain View
San Bernardino CA 92415
10. California Regional Water Quality
Control Board, Santa Ana Region
6833 Indiana Avenue, Suite 1
Riverside CA 92506
'
EXHIBIT E -Page 4 of 4
..... 7
ERNEST A. BRYANT, Ill
MANAGER
February 25, 1975
Mr. Ray E. Lewis
RANCHO SANTA ANA
238!50 ESPERANZA ROAD
ANAHEIM. CALIFORNIA Q2S06
Chief Engineer ..
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO ·. 2
P. O. Box 8127 ·
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject: Alignment of Santa Ana Interce ptor
Sewer through Rancho Santa Ana
Dear Mr. Lewis:
We h a ve revi.ewed the alignment for the subj ec.t project as
shown on the maps prepared by Lowry and Asso'ciates. We
agree with the alignment shown in g~neral on the attached
map and more specifically shown in green on the 1 11 = 200
feet topo strip map.
' We have no objection to the commencement of the final
design of the project along this alignment.
We understand that the right-of-way acquisition will be
discussed at a later date.
Very truly yours,. ·
ERJ.~EST A. BRYANT, III
Manager, Rancho Santa Ana
EAB:md
EXHIBIT F ..
T E L E r H 0 N E :538·2351
PRESl!:>F.NT ·R. D . LF.WIS 154 NORTH GLASSELL STREET
P. o. Box 6 VIC!!:-P;"IESICENTS
F.. E. PANKEY
H. E. B,\LM~P. Oron.t;J e, Colifol"nio 92666
February 11, 1975 GECR~ARY -MANAGC:R
WILLIAM a. WEST
,.
County Sanitation District #2
of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Gentlemen-:
We have reviewed the proposed alignment of the Santa
Ana River Interc e~te r Se~er, spe cifically the Alignment
"A" as recorrunend ed by Lowry and Associates in their
project report dated February 19, 1974.
We are in general agr eeraent as to the Alignment 11 A 11 as
recom.'11 e nded, ·subj ec t to an additional revie\•; of the
final plans when prepared.
As we have suggested, th ~r e are a· few specific requests
which we wil l like to include before the specif ications
for the contract are written. •
Very truly yours,
(--. /.
;··--:·~~<>/
-........ \ A ( .. ·; ., L ~iJ:-...
D. c~HANSON --
Secretary-Manager
EXHIBIT G
O I RF.CTOH4
R . O. LEWI::>
E. E. Pl\N:<EY •
H. E . BALMER
F.. T . WATSON
H . NITTA
. .
,.
SAVI DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.
P . 0. BOX 27
154 NOfffH GLASSELL srnEET
ORANGE. CALIFORNIA D26G6
PHONE 538. 633G · ·
February 11, 1975
County Sanitation District #2 of Orange Cou~ty
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Gentlemen:
11~· -
We have reviewed the proposed alignment of the Santa Ana
River Intercepter Sewer, specifically the Alignment "A 11
as recornm·ended by 'Lowry and Associates in the,i.r project
report dated February 19, 1974.
We are in general agreem~nt as to the Alignment "A"
as recor:u-nended, subject to ·an additional revie\·1 of the
final pl~ns when prepared.
As we have suggested, there are a few s~eclfi c requests
which we will like· to include before the specifications
for the contract are written .
Very truly yours,
EXHIBIT H
.. .... . .-~·
March 12, 1975
CO.UNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
·or ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
· P. 0 . BOX 8127
108-4-4 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71-4) 5-40-2910
(714) 962-2-411
TO:· MEMBERS OF ·THE SPECIAL SELECTION COMMITTEE FOR
LEGAL COUNSEL'
Norma Gibbs, Chairpers6n ....-
Ph1111p Cox /.--
Jess Perez 0-
Don Saltarelli L--
John Store i.--
Bernie Svalstad v
Frances Wopd .._.
Attached is a compilation of the selections made by
six of the seven Committee members. Chairperson Gibbs
has requested that the C9mmittee meet immediately follow-
ing the adjournment of the Joint Boards this evening ~o
determine those candidates which the Committee members
wish to interview. ·
FAH:hje
Enclosure
cc: Joint Chairman Winn
Fred A. Harper
General Manag~r
i :
March 12 ,· 1975
· COMPOSITE OF SELECTIONS MADE BY SPECIAL COMMITTEE FOR
LEGAL COUNSEL
Name
Stewart, Woodruff & Frazee
1055 North Main St., Suite 1020
·Santa Ana, CA 92701 ·
Robert F. Waldron
· ·2020 North Broadway
Suite 102
Santa Ana, CA 92706
Alexander Bowie
610· N~wport Center Drive
Suite 500 .
· ·:Newport Beach, CA . 92660 · ··
Davis and Killian
4600 Campus Drive
Suite .500
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Patterson, Pqst & Smith
1200 North Main St.
Suite 900
Santa Ana, CA . 92701
Martin E. Whelan, Jr., ·rnc .
7915 S. Painter Avenue
P. o. Box 4159
Wbittier, CA 90607 >
. John C. Woolley, Inc •.
. 1·2550 Brookhurst. St.
Garden ~rove,_ CA 92640
George G. Logan
1151 Dove Drive
Suite 220
Newport -Bea~h, CA ·92660 .
··Ebben and Brown
615 S. Flower Street • Suite 1201 · ·
Los Ang e les, CA 90017
".
2/?..7/75 Votes ·Received ·
6
.6
4
4
4
.4
1 :
3
. 2
3/11/75
Votes Received
6
6
3
4 .
6
6
2
2
/
cJ.C S. D .
E/OD t:JF ?Rc>P5RTY
W EST EL£VATl()/V
s {! c;.c.
P R.'O P.ER T'I
i;r --· -----· ~1 j : ; I 'I I r f I t , I 1 • I 1 · · ! ...
' . • • 1 .
l ...
~ • l
, • I --.._....._\"'"'!-__ _
Agenda Item No. /6
March 6, 1975
COUNTY SANITATION D!STRICTS
at ORANGE CoUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8 ?27
IQll.4.4 EU.IS A VENUE
FOUNTAIN VAU.EY, CALI FORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(7l4) 962-24 11
STAFF REPORT RE: REVISION OF ANNEXATION POLICIES AND FEES
FOR DISTRICTS 2, 3, 7, and 11.
On January 8, 1975, the Boards referred this matter
back to the s taff for further explanation.
Districts 2 & 7
Presently, in Districts 2 and 7, the a nnexa t ion fees
are identical, $526. They are based on the 1 965 and 1968 con-
struction estimates for sewer facili ties to serve annexable
territories. Beginning in ·1970, the two District Boards autho-
rized an annual escalation to reflect EPA sewer construc tion
cost index increases for the Los Ang eles area, or a minimum
annual increase of $10 p er a cre.
District 3
District No. 3 currently has an annexation fee of $1016,
which is the net worth per acre plus $150 . With the excep tion
of the U. S. Naval Weapons St ation near S eal Beac h , the Distr ict
has ~nly about 5 acres left to annex.
District 11
District No. 11 adopted an annexation policy in 196 3,
which was based on a n estimate of trunk sewer facil i ties to
serve annexab le property at that time. The annexation fee ha s
remained at a constant figure, $66 per quarter acre, which is
equivalent to $264 per a cre . Th e net worth acreage fee at this
time would b e $407 .
District 5
On Febru a ry 18th, the District 5 Board h eld an adjourned
meeting and a t that time reaffirmed its position to maintai n its
annexati on fee of ~1017/acre , which is based on the net worth
per acre of the Distric t.
It is the staff 's recommendation that the Boards adopt a
uniform annexation policy re l ative to annexation f e es effective
July 1, 1975, which is to be computed annually at th e be g inning
of each fiscal year (July 1), based on the net wo rth of the Di s -
trict divided by the acreage within the District .
·suMMARY OF DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION POLICY
Annexation Policy Resolution:
Effective Date:
Provision for Processing Fee:
Basis of Annexation Fee:
Current Annexation Fee:
Provision for Escalating
Annexation Fee
Next Date Annexation Fee
Escalates:
Remarks:
3-12-67
All fees w/ $325 minimum
Based on 1965 Estimate of Sewer
Facilities to serve annexable
territory. Date paid governs fee
$526/acre
Beginning 1-1 -7 0 escalated annual ly
to refl~ct EPA Sewer Construct i on
Cost Ind ex for L.A. Area or minimum
of $10/acre (October Index Us e d).
1-1-76
Net worth acreage fee would be '$752
: ., ...
SUMMARY OF DISTRICT NO. 3 ANNEX ATION POL°ICY
Annexation Policy Resolution:
Effective Date:
Provision for Processing Fee:
·Basis of Annexation Fee:
Current Annexation Fee:
Prov·isiori for Escalating
Annexation Fee:
N~xt Date Annexation Fee ·
Escalates:
Remarks:
72-6-3
..
1-1-72
· All fees w/ $325 minimum
Net worth per acre of Dis t r i c t
plus $150. Da t e of Bo~rd appro val
governs fee
$1016/acre
Beginning 1-1-7 3 escalated ann ually
based on n et wo rt h o f Dis t ri c t
preceding j une 30 t h ·pius $1 50
1-1-76
Net worth a crea ge fee wou ld be
$866 if $1 50 fee is omit ted.
Recommend eli mi n a tion o f $150 fe e
SUMMARY OF DISTRICT NO. 7 ANNEXATION POLICY
Annexation Policy Resolution: 68-88-7
Effective Date: 10-9-68
Provision for Processing Fee: · All fees w/ $325 minimum
·Basis of Annexation Fee: Based on 1968 Estimate of Trunk
Sewer Facilities to serve annexable
territory. Date paid governs fee
Current Annexation Fee: $526/acre
Provision for Escalating Beginnirtg 1-1-70 escalated annually
Annexation Fee: to reflect EPA Sewer Construction
Cost Index ·for L . .A. Area or minimum·
of $10/acre (October Index Used)
Next Date Annexation Fee
Escalates: 1-1-76
Remarks: Net worth acreage fee would be $690
" ..
SUMMARY OF DISTRICT NO. 11 ANNEXATION POLICY
Annexation Policy Resolution:
Effective Date:
Provision for Processing Fee:
Basis of Annexation Fee:
Current Annexation Fee:
Provision for Escalating
Annexation Fee:
Next Date Annexation Fee
Escalates:
Remarks:
10-1-63
None
Based on 1964 Estimate of Trunk
Sewer Facilities to serve annexable
territory
$66 per 1/4 acre .w/ $75 minimum.
(Equivalent to $264/acre).
None
Net worth acreage fee wbuld be $~07.
Under current policy, have agr~e ment
with City of Huntington Beach to
collect· fees
-..... "' DRAFT 3/6/75
RESOLUTION NO.
ESTABLISHING ANNEXATION POLICY
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD PF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO._ OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING FEES AND PROCEDURES CON-
CERNING ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT
* • • * * * • * * * *
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to establish certain
requirements for territory seeking annexa€ion to this Dis trict .
. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT. RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the proponents of any application for annexa-
tion of any territ.ory to the District shall, as a condition to
securing app·roval of the Board of Directors of the District to such
annexation, comply with the following:
Requirements:
(a) Payment of all costs incurred in processin.g the
annexation.
(b) From the· period beginning ,·and -------
ending -------' payment to the District of the sum of
per acre of territory so annexed. Beginning ~--------
and annually thereafter , the sum to be paid per acre for the eDsuing
12 months will be the net worth per acre of the District on
the preceding June 30th . The date of approval by the Board of
D~rectors of the annexation shall govern the amount of the fee per
acre hereinabove established.
(c) That the annexed territory be subject to the .terms
. and conditions of all ordinances pertaining to fees for connection
to the District's facilities, and use of.said facilities.
(d) The annexed territory shall be annexed into an
appropriate sewering agency, such as a city, for the purpose of
maintaining and operating the local sewer system including pumping
stations and force mains.
(e) The territory, upon annexation, shall be subject to
all ad valorem taxes required for the retirement of the existing and
future bonds of the District.
(f) Any area within the terr itory annexed shall be
concurrently withdrawn from any Special District which has levied
ad valorem taxes or other charges for the same services within the
ter ritory to be annexed that County Sanitation Distric t No .
will provide following annexation , to avo i d an overlappiqg taxing
entity.
Section 2. That the procedures for annexations of territory to
the District shall be as set forth on Sc~edule ''A" attached hereto
and made a part of this resolution , and the District's staff is hereby
directed to give to the proponents of any proposed· annexation a copy
Df Schedule "A" outlining the procedures to be followe d.
Section 3. That the staff be directed to transmit to the Local
Agency Formation Commission a certified copy of this resolution.
Section 4 . That the provisions of this resolution shall ap~ly
to any annexation of territory to the District initiated on or after
Section 5 . That all other resolutions or motions i n co nflic t
herewith are hereby repe a l e d and made of ·no further effect .
-2 -
SUMMARY OF LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION'S AND
DISTRICT NO. 2'S ACTIONS RE PROPOSED ANNEXATION
NO. 8 -TRACT NO. 4980 TO COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT NOo 2
PURPOSE OF ANNEXATION
The purpose of this annexation is to provide public sanitary sewer service
for approximately 8 acres of territory proposed to be annexed in the vicinity
of Mallard Street and Collins Avenue in the City of Orange.
PURPOSE OF HEARING
Because the territory proposed to be annexed is presently inhabited, it
is necessary to hold this public hearing to determine if there is a majority
protest against annexation. This is a result of the developer of the territory
failing to annex the area to the District prior to development when said
property was annexed to the City of Orange.
If less than 25% of the number of landowners within
territory owning not more than 25% of the assessed valuation
of land therein, and less than 25% of the voting power of
voters entitled to vote as a result of residing in or owning
property within the territory, protest, then following the
hearing, the Board may order annexation of the territory.
If more than 25% but less than 50% of the number of
landowners within the territory, or more than 25% but less
than 50% of the voting power protest, then an election must
be held.
If more than 50% of the assessed valuation or more than
50% of the voting power protest, than the annexation must be
abandoned.
ASSESSED VALUATION AND VOTING POWER:
Assessed valuation of the territory has been determined to be $394,070.
Number of voters in the territory has been determined to be 58.
IF ANNEXATION FAILS:
In the event annexation fails, the Board of Directors on October 10, 1973,
declared their intent to levy a sewer service charge in the amount of $10 or
more per residential unit per month.
TO DATE, THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS HAVE TAKEN PLACE:
On October 10, 1973, the Board of Directors took the following actions:
Adopted Resolution Noo 73-170-2, declaring a special exception
for Tract No. 4980 and waived District connection fees therefor; and,
Denied request of the City of Orange for waiver of annexation
fees on Tract No. 4980; and,
Adopted Resolution No. 73-149-2, authorizing initiation of
proceedings to annex the territory and setting fees therefor at
one-half the established amount, pursuant to the declaration of a
special exception for said annexation; and,
Declared intent to levy a sewer service charge in the amount
of $10 per unit per month if annexation is not completed.
On April 24, 1974, the Local Agency Formation Commission adopted Resolution
No. 74-39, declaring its findings regarding the proposed annexation, approving
said annexation, and directing County Sanitation District No. 2 to proceed
with the annexation. (Proceedings have been held in abeyance pending final
corrections to the map and legal description by the proponent.)
-2-
On February 19, 1975, the Board of Directors adopted Resolution No. 75-20-2,
fixing March 12, 1975, at 8:30 p.m. as the date and time of hearing on proposed
Annexation No. 8 -Tract No. 4980, and establishing procedures for filing of
written protest.
Notice of the hearing has been continuously posted on the Districts'
bu 11 et in boa rd s i nee February 20, 19 75.
On February 20, documents were mailed to owners of record within the
territory proposed to be annexed, affected cities and special districts,
District No. 2 Directors, and other interested parties, containing the
following information:
Letter of explanation
Brochure explaining the District's function
Official Notice of Public Hearing
Maps indicating the area to be annexed
Copy of resolution fixing the hearing
Legal notice of the hearing was published in the Santa Ana Register on
February 26 and March 5, 1975.
To date, ----written protests have been filed with the Secretary.
-3-
~TATE OF .CALIFORNIA THE RF.SOURCES AGENCY
Agenda Item No. 3 9
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY CONTROL
1100M 1015, RESOURCES BUILDING
~ NINTH STIZEET • SACRAMENTO 9'81.4 ..._.,.. .
MAR 5 1975
Mr. Robert E. .Moore
Manager
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority
7150 Brockton Avenue
Riverside, CA· 92506
·Dear Mr. MJore:
ED:t<IDND G. BROWN JR. t fN'o/Jk£fill!Jc~nrnor
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, Santa Ana River Interceptor,
Reaches III and IV, Project No. 74-0951 2 F. Y. 1973-74 2 Concept Approval
This office has reviewed the project report and the supplemental information
for the subject project. The Division of Water Quality with the concurrence
of the Environmental Protection Agency hereby approves the concept of
constructing Reaches III and IV of the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI)
through Prado Dam as shown on Figure IX-1 of the project report and described
in this letter.
ELIGIBLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The foll.owing _items will be eligible for grant participation:
Reaches III and IV of the ·SARI for a peak fl~w of 30 MGD flowing full.
The eligibility of the interceptor oversizing will be determined by a
ratio of eligible peak flow, flowing full over the Design peak flow
flowing full, or size to accommodate 30 MGD, whichever is greater.
The eligible project cost for the above facilities is estimated at $7,763,650.
CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT APPRoVAL:
This concept approval is contingent on the following:
1. Receipt of the complete final plans and specifications by the date
specified below. If the plans and specification are not submitted
by this date, concept approval may be withdrawn.
2. A revised sewer use ordinance which imposes a graduated limitation
on the minimum concentration of dissolved solids which may be dis-
charged to the SiLtU.
J •
Mr. Robert E •. Moore
Project No. 74-0951
- 2 -
3. Resolution of the financing plan problems as stated in the
November 19, 1974," letter from Mr. Gillette to Mr. Warren.
4. A revision of Ordinance 74-1 providing a reimbursement for lateral
construction. The formulation should provide for equitability to
all users regardless of their distance from the SARI.
5. All four water districts must agree to and sign the Joint Powers
Agreement concerning the formation of the project authority prior
to certification.
AUTHORIZATION AND INSTRUCTIONS TO PREPARE FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS:
Concept approval includes approval of design criteria provided in the
project report and is your authorization to proceed with the preparation
of final plans and specifications.
Upon completion of final plans and. specifications, the following· must be
submitted. to this.office for review:
1. Two signed sets· of the final plans and specifications.
2. Two copies of complete Operat~on & Maint~nance Manuci.l in draft form.
3. Outline of Proposed Instructional Program in conformance with State
guidelines. ,
4. Upd.ated project cost estimate which includes a breakdown of all
engineering costs, (i.e., project report, plans and specifications,
inspection, soil testing, etc.), 0 & M Manual, Revenue Program, and
other costs.
The plans, specifications,. and Operation & Maintenance Manual must· be
submitted by April 1, 1975. Upon receipt and approval, the State will
certify the eligible project to the EPA for a Federal Grant.
ADDITIONAL INFORJ.'1ATION ~'ID DOCUMENTS NEEDED PRIOR TO CERTIFICATION:
The following additional information and document5 must also be submitted
and approved prior to project certificatio~:
1. The documents and requested information contained in the enclosed
Clean Water Grant application packet. If the application and
supporting documents cannot be returned within 60 days of receipt,
please contact this office.
Mr. Robert E. Moore
Project No. 74-0~51
CONDITIONS OF CERTIFICATION:
-3-
In addition to any standard provisions, the State and EPA will place
the following special conditions on the project certification or any
grants that ~ght be awarded 'on this project:
1. The Grantee shall operate its treatment works as a coordinated ·
~egional facility providing service on a fair and equitable basis
and in accordance with guidelines and regulations of the State Board.
2. A contract to provide for operation and maintenance of the upper
basin portion of. the SARI and th~ groundwater extractions must be
agreed to, signed, ·and submitted.
Tliis concept approval includes only that project described above and does
not include any associated projects which may have been referred to in
the project report and does not guarantee grant funding on any subsequent
project which may be necessary to assure that the approved project is
functional. The need for and the sizing of SARI reaches !Va, IVb, and IVc
can only be determined after a comprehensive·planning study has determined
what salt loads must be removed from each area and commitments have been
developed to achieve this removal.
Should you have any questions, please contact Robert Gillette, the evaluator.
assigned· to your project at (916) 322-4940.
Sincerely,
frrt1~
f' ~ Larry F. Walker ~ Division Chief
M~ager -~lean Water Grant Program
cc: CRW.QCB, Santa Ana River Region
EPA, Region IX
Attention: Russ Beckwith
James M. Montgomery Engineers
555 East Walnut Street
Pasadena, CA 91101
Attention: Dr. Frank Grant
Lowery and Associates
121 East Washington Avenue
Santa Ana, CA
Attention:. Don Martinson
3/12/75
Joint Chairman Winn:
Please announce that the Washington meeting that you and
Mr. Harper were scheduled to attend next week has been
rescheduled to the middle of April.
i .'
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
February 21, 1975
Senator John Tunney
Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Attention: Ms. Jane Frank
Dear Ms • Frank:
We have been advised by Lee C. White, general counsel for
the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA)
that Senators Stevenson and Muskie will be meeting some-
time during the week of March 3rd to discuss a possible
amendment to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act
(PL 92-500), which would permit the use of local ad valorem
taxes as one of several sources of revenue for user charge
systems. We are bringing this matter to your attention
because without this amendment, our agency will be forced
to develop a system of charges for over 400,000 separate
connections serving a population of l~ million in more
than 24 incorporated cities. The billing system required
to effectively collect these charges would significantly
add to our Districts' operating costs by as much as 25%,
or $700,000 a year additional burden on our users without
any improvement in service or water quality. The Los
Angeles County Sanitation Districts, serving a population
exceeding 3~ million, also face this tremendous task of
establishing a special charge system. There must be many
other agencies throughout California in the same boat.
Local public agencies in California, particularly our
agency, can demonstrate their ability to finance activities
and distribute costs equitably among the users, and thereby
maintain an efficient, cost-effective program of wastewater
quality control.
I,
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
Our Boards of Directors adopted enclosed Resolution No. 74-125
in September, 1974, requesting amendment to the Federal Act to
allow the use of ad valorem taxes as a source of revenue for
user charge systems.
, . ~ . . I
Senator John Tunney
February 21, 1975
Page Two
COUNTY SANITATION. DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
We believe this matter is significant and should be brought
to the attention of Senator Tunney. We request that our
views from California be made known to Senator Muskie,
Chairman of the Subcommittee on Environmental Pollution.
Don Winn, Chairman
Joint Boards of Directors
DW:j
Enclosure
cc: Rep. Del Clawson
23rd District
Rep. Andrew J. Hinshaw
39th District
Rep. Jerry M. Patterson
34th District
Rep. Charles E. Wiggins
25th District
Los Angeles County Sanitation
Districts
Metropolitan Sanitary District
of Greater Chicago
Lee C. White ~
'//
\
·J'
3/12/75
Joint Chairman Winn:
Please announce that the Washington meeting that you and
Mr. Harper were scheduled to attend next week has been
rescheduled to the middle or April.
~MEETING DATE March 12 , 1975 TIME 7 :30 p .m. DISTRICTS l ,2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ,7 , & 11
DISTRICT 1
DIEDRICH ····BATTIN ······~ ----
GARTHE) ······EVANS·······~ ----
R I MA· • • • • • • • v ----
(LANGLEY).···· SALTARELLI··~ ----
DISTRICT 2
(Fl;JJNG) •••.••• CHAPUT······~ ----
. ~NS) ••• ·••· CALLAHAN····~ ___ _
DIEDRICH)···· CLARK·······~ ___ _
EVANS)······· GARTHE • • • • • • ~ ___ _
NEVI l-). · · · · ··GRAHAM· • • • • · ~ ___ _
TH OM) •• • • • • • • KAYWOOD· • • · • ~ __ __
FOX) ••• •••·• ·MAC KAIN • • • • ~ ___ _
PERRY· • • • • • • v" ___ _
!SVA LS TAD) ····SCOTT· • • • • • · ~ ___ _
PEREZ).······ TEMPLE······~ ___ _
DUNNE)······ ·WINN········~ ___ _
ROOT)······· ·WOOD········~ ___ _
DISTRICT 3
CMACKAIN) •.••• FOX·········~ ----
AMO · • • • • • • • • __.£._ ___ _
!NUIJENS) ·····ARB ISO•·····~ ___ _
BLAC KM AN) ···MC KNEW • • • ~ ___ _
COLLI NS) · • • • ·BYRNE· • • • • • • ~ ___ _
HOMRI GHAUSEN) COX·· • · • • · • · ~ ___ _
CULVER······~ ___ _
~MEYER) ·······DAVIS·······~ ___ _
EVANS) • • • • • • ·GARTHE • · • • • • --___ _
THOM) ········K AYWOOD·····~
IXOUNG) ·······NEVIL······· ---==== ====
1· 1D) ········ROOT ········ ...-
b-rE DRI CH) ····S CHMIT······ a-----
LACAYO) • • • • • ·SONJU • • • • · • • ~ ----
STANTON) •• 00 SVALSTAD.... ~ ----
(COEN) .... ••• ·WIEDER·· .... ~====
DISTRICT 5 /,·
(RYCKOFF) ••••• MC INNIS •.•• ~ ----
(DIEDRICH) •••. RI LEY.. . • • • • .,,,,, ----
ROGERS •••••• ~ ___ _
DISTRICT 6
RIMA········~ ___ _
(DIEDRICH.) ····BATT! N • • • · • • ~ ___ _
(MC INNIS)·· • • ·STORE • • • • • • • ......, ___ _
DISTRICT 7
. LANGL~Y ••••• SALTARELLI •• ~ ----
PRYOR) •••••• .BURTON •••••• ~ __ --
DIEDRICH.)··· ·CLARK·······~ ___ _
(MC INNIS)···· ·DOSTAL······ ~ __ --
(GARTHE) ······E VANS······· ____ _
GLOCKNER···· 0... __ --
(PF:REZ) ·······JAC KM AN·····~ ___ _
Di"S'TRICT 11 -"""° ~
~COEN •• • • • • • 0 DUKE • • • • • • • • ~ ----
COEN ........ GIBBS .... ··-~ ----
DIEDRICH) •• • -SCHMIT······~ ----
ISTRI CT 8 .
3/1 2 /75
JOINT BOARDS
(DUNNE) • • • • • • WINN··· • • • •• ~
AMO······ ... ~ --
NUIJENS) • • • • ARBISO· • • • • • ~ __
DI EDRI CHi • • • BATT! N • • • · • • _L_ __
BLACKM)AN • • • MC KNEW . • • • • ~ __
PRYOR ······BURTON······~ COLLI~S) ····BYRNE······· ,,,,,, ====
L~O~S) • • • • • • CALLAHAN· • • • ~ __
E I G • • j · · · CHAPUT • • • • • • ~ __
DIEDRICH • · ·)CLAR K· • • • • • • ____£_ __
HOMRIGHAUSEN COX········· '-"""'
CULVER······ V --
MEYER) • · • • • • DAVIS· • • • • · • V --
MC INNIS).··· DOSTAL ······ ~J5i/
COEN) • • • • · • · DUKE· • • • • • • • 0... __
GARTHE) y · · · EVA NS· • • • • • • ~ __
MAC KAIN • • • · FOX· • .. • • • • · • ~ __
EVANS)······ GARTHE······ • ..,,
COEN) .... • .. GIBBS .. • .... ~ --
(NEVIL) •••••.
lPEREl) ••••••
THOM) ••.••••
FOX) ....... .
RYCKOfF) ..••
(YOUNG) •..••.
----GLOCKNER·. · • (L.. __
GRAHAM ••.••• ~ __
JACK MAN ••••• ~ __
KAYWOOD .••.• ~ __ ·
MAC KAIN • • • • V' __
MC INNIS .. .. v
NEV I L. • . • . • • V""' ·--
PERRY.. • • • • • V" --
(DIEDRICH) ••• RILEY ................. --
(WOOD) .•.••••
(LANGLEY) ••.•
!
DIEDRICH) •••
SVALST (4.D) •••
LACAYO) .••••
MC INNIS) ••••
STAN TON) •••
!PEREZ) ••••••
COEN) ••.••••
ROOT) ••.••• ·,
OTHERS
, .
RIMA •••••..• V"' ==
ROGERS •••••• ~ __
ROOT. . . . . . . . ......-
SALTARELLI.. V --
SCHMIT •••••• ·~
SCOTT •.••••• ~a...-
SONJU ••••••• ~-
STORE ••..•.. ~ --
SVALSTAD •... ~ --
TEMPLE ••...• __iL:. --
WI EDER •••.•. /--
WObD •.•••.•• ~ --
HAR PER
SYLVESTER
LEWIS
CLARKE
TAYL OR
BROWN
NISSON
EWING
HOH ENER
HOWARD
HUNT
KE ITH
KENNEY
LYNCH
MADDOX
MARTINSON
PIERSALL
STEVENS --
MEET I NG DATE March 12, 1975
DISTRICT 1
TIME 7 :3 0 p m DISTRICTS 1 ,2,3,5,6 ,7 & n
JOINT BOARDS
DIEDRICH ····BATTIN······ V ___ _
GARTHE) ······EVANS······· ---1.:::::::::: ----
RIMA·····... V ___ _
(LANGLEY) • • • • ·SAL TAR ELLI • • ~ ----
DISTRICT 2
~i:WI NG) ••• •••• CHAPUT······~ ___ _
QNS). ······CALLAHAN····~ ___ _
DIEDRICH)···· CLARK·······~ ___ _
EVANS)······· GARTHE • • • • • • -1.L ___ _
NEVI~)······· GRAHAM······~--__
THOM)········ KAYWOOD·····~ ___ _
FOX) •• •••••• ·MAC KAIN • • • · ~--__
PERRY·······~
!SVALSTAD) ····SCOTT······· v-----
PEREZ)······· TEMPLE······~======
DUNNE)· • • • ···WINN··· • • • • • ./
ROOT) ••• ·····WOOD········ .i/7 ==== ==
DISTRICT 3
(MAC KAIN). • • • ·FOX· • • • • • • • • ~--__
AMO · · · • • · · · .. -1,,,L_
! NU I JENS) • • • • ·A RB I S 0 • • · • · · v ----
BLACKMAN) ···MC KNEW • • • _L ----
COLLI NS) • • · • ·BYRNE· • • • • • • ~ ----
HOMRl GHAUSEN) COX········· ~ == ==
CULVER······
lMEYER) ·······DAVIS·······~======
EVANS) ·······GARTHE·· ····~
TH OM) • • • • • · • ·KAYWOOD • • · • • v ----
YO UNG) • • • • • ··NEVIL·· • · • • • ~ ----
1 -'OD) ········ROOT········ _L ----
'M'EDRI CH) ····SCHMIT······ 0........-----
LACAYO) • • • • • ·SONJU • • • • · • • ~ ----
STANTON) • • • ·SVALSTAD • • · • JJ:!!L ----
COEN) • • • • • • ··WI EDER·· • • • • ~ ==== ==
DISTRICT 5
RYCKOFF •••.• MC INNIS • • • • ~ ___ ,_: _
DIEDRICH) •••. RILEY....... ___ _
ROGERS • • • . • • (]../ ___ _
DISTRICT 6
RIMA········ v ___ _
(DIEDRICH)··· ·BATTIN······~ ___ _
(MC INNIS)···· ·STORE·······~--___ _
DISTRICT 7
LANGL[:Y ••.•• SALTARELLI •• V __ _
PRYOR) •.••••. BURTON •••••• --v7' ___ _
DIEDRICK) • • • ·CLARK • • • • • • • V
(MC INNIS)···· ·DO STAL······ :;:;::-== ~
(GARTHE) ······EVANS······· ·
GLOCKNER · • · • CL-: ----
(PEREZ) • · • · • · ·JACKMAN • • • • • /7" == ==
Dl"STRICT 11
lCOEN • • • • • • • ·DUKE • • • • • • • • ~--
CO E N • •• • • · • .GIBBS • • • • • •• _JL_ __ --
DIEDRICH) • • • .SCHMIT • • • • • • ---0...L-----
DISTRICT 8
\ / M\TCHELL •• ·~ _ -(~OHNSOtD • • • • ·HO ~M • • • • ·/_ :-""""~ (o)~t cH) ••• ·RIL EY.~ •••. ·-- -
3/1 2 /75
(DUNNE) • · • • • • WINN·· • • • ••• ~ __
AMO· · · · · · . • . V'
NUI JENS) • • • • ARBI SO· • •• . . V --
DI EDRl CH)··· BATTIN······ -V---
BLACKMAN)··· MC KNEW _ • · • • ~ --
PRYOR) • • • • • • BURTON· · • • · • 1/ --
COLLI ~s) • _. · · BYRNE· • · • • • • v ==
LYONS • • • • • • CALLAHAN· • · • ~
EWING • • • • • • CHAPUT· · • .•• _iL_ --
DIEDRICH)··· CLARK······· v --
HOMRI GHAUSEN) COX········· ~ --
CULVER······ \/"" R4v4
MEYER) • · • • • · DAVIS· • • · · · • ---V '7 ' f "
MC IN.NIS). • • • DOSTAL······ v 'l}_-!J J:5
COEN) ••. • • • • DUKE· • • • • · · • OJ
GARTHE) · • • • • EVANS· • • • • • • ~ --
MAC KAIN). • • · FOX· • · • • • · · • ~ --
EVANS) • • • • • • GARTHE · • · •• • -V --
COEN) .. ·•••• GIBBS··· .... ---V---
GLOCKNER· ••• CV---
(NEVIL) ••.••. GRAHAM ••••.• \_.../ ==
Ip EREl) •••••• JACKMAN. • . . • v
THOM) ••..••• KAYWOOD ..••• t.,/". ==
FOX) •.•..••• MAC KAIN • • • • v
RYCKOfF) •••• MC INNIS ..•• v --
YOUNG) • . • • • • NEVIL. • . • . • • v --
PERRY ••••.•• __iL__ --
( D I ED R I CH ) • • • R I LEY • . . • . • • ___i_L_ --
RI MA •...•.•• -V---
(wooD) ••..•••
(LANGLEY) .•.•
!
DIEDRICH) •••
SV ALSTfl,D) •.•
LACAYO) .••••
MC INNIS) ••••
STANTON) •••
1
PEREZ) ••••••
COEN) ••.••••
ROOT) ••..•• -.
OTHERS
ROGERS . • • • • • ---;:;----
~~~~ ARELL i:: =?' ==
SCHMIT ••.••• -c;J4!.J
SCOTT ••••••• -~ --
SONJ U • • • • • • • 7.(/)..,/ --
STORE. • • • • • • c-/ --
SVALSTAD •. ._. ~ --
TEMPLE.. . • • • i.-----
WI EDER...... L/ --
WObD . . . • • • • • _LL._ ==
HARPER
'· SYLVESTER
LEWIS
CLA RK E
TAYLOR
BROWN
NISSON
EWING
HOHENER
HOWARD
HUNT
KEITH
KENNEY
LYNCH
MADDOX
MARTINSON
PIERSALL
STEVENS -.
March 1 2 , 1975
3b) Supv. Battin ann o u nced tha t he h ad a n ew membe r on hi s staff who
had previously served on the Board and some of the committees here --
Joseph Hyde . Sai d he will be Batti n 's liaison with some of the
city representatives.
(5) Report of the Joint Chairman
Wi n n advised t hat he and Mr. Harper had b een authorized at the last
meeting to go to Washington in connection with PL 92 -500 and the 1972
Amendments to the Water Pol l ution Contro l Act, but this has been
postponed to the middle of Apri l . Will meet wi th AMSA and at a
seminar of the Water Poll ution Control Federation.
Al so reported that a letter was sent to Senator Tunney and various
ot h er representati ves regarding permitt ing use of ad valorem taxes
as one of the sources for tax revenue.
(6) Report of the Genera l Manage r
Mr. Harper reported further on the l etter to Senator Tunney. Said it
appeared that this was the ·only amendment of three that EPA chose to
approach Congress with this year . Said one week ago Senator Stevenson
and Muskie got t ogether and the people in attendance did not have the
proper answers to give Senator Muskie as reasons why the ad valorem
ta x is or can be a proper revenue source fo r agencies such as ourselves .
Sai d we have to go back and do a good job on appealing now. Senator 's
concern is that after Federal money is spent, whether the agency will
have sufficient funds on an annual basis to maintain the facilities
properly and be able to repay them when the time comes. Our agency
can demonstrate that over the years we have had long range plans and
have made our commitments to maintain the property .
Regarding the grant funds being released ($9 billion from EPA) there
is a push by Governor Brown 's office to get some of these projects
going. SWRCB i s starting to push out the projects . They have $1 .6
billion for construction of water polluti on control facilities.
These funds will be allocated by September of 1977 . That means the
project has to be designed ang environmental assessment done . Our
Districts submitted a project report to State one year ago this month.
Anticipated the construction would take 8 years to do the work. High
point as far as cash flow is about the mi ddle of the period ($51 million
during one month). We have received the grant offer on JPL process --
$3~ million to perfect this system to prove or disprove it aid prepare
a facilities plan. Have to come up with a 25 year master plan . In
addition, we are going to have to prepare another environmental impact
statement that should have been done by EPA but they don 't have the
staff so they are entering into an agreement for us to do it . They
will pay for 87~% of it. Wi l l rave to be done within next 18 months.
If we wait 18 months to come to some of the decisions, there will not
be enough time to get plans and specs done to get in on $1 .6 billion
in grants . Suggested that Boards meet sometime later thi s month, at
which time we will outline the program step by step which we feel we
would l ike to do. On supplemental agenda this meeting have asked
for authorization to proceed with some of .the work that is being
required in the development area that i s not refundable. Said
another significant factor is that if it appears that an agency
finds that they are hung up because of the Coastal Commission,
Fish & Game ,Ai r Quality Board , etc. that puts a hold on the project
·· without giving an answer, we have been told that if we get in touch
with Tom Quinn's office at State Board, they will go direct l y t o
agency and find out what th e probl em is.
Ray Lewi s then gave s lide present at ion on Pl-16 project and other
construction projects in the Districts.
(7) Report of the General Counsel
Nisson reported re law s uit on P2-2 0 , that t hrou gh the e ff orts of Ray
Le wis and cooperation of contractor and bonding company, have avoided
a lawsuit. Di stric t will be fini shing the job. Bonding company will
come up with $20,00 0 to fini sh the job. Probably will be ready to
accept by April. Said a lot of credit goes to Ray Le wis and the staff
on this.
Advised he spent considerab l e amount of time on wastewater ordinance .
Revised ordinance sent out to Directors. Ther e is a provision for
ad valorem taxes to t ake care of o rdinanc e service. If law passes,
will have to take care of that in the future. Are working through
CASA group to get amendment to San itation Districts Act whereby
ordinances will carry some bite in them. Now $100 fin e and 30 d ays
in jail. Now is the time to get that amended and push for legislation
so will be effective when amended.
Reported that AFSCME are seeking a vote to see if they can represent
the emp l oyees. We told them we had a contract and i t was up in
November and would t h en consider th~J.lJ-right to vote . (Contract Bar
Doctrine Labor Law) Have sued for~~of Mandate. Nisson advised
that in accordance with Board's previous a u thorization, have ~mployed
Musick , Peeler & Garrett to represent the Districts , particularly by
Larry A. Cu rtis in Los Angeles. The ir rates are $50 -70 per hour.
Larry Curtis is $60/hour,wh o is the one who will· be doing the work.
Hearingva.s set for March 18th and Curtis suggested that we require
them to include the OCEA as a necessary party and Nisson concurred .
Hearing now set for 2nd or 7th of Ap ril wit h probability it will be
extended beyond that time . Our position is that the legi slature is
working on new l egislation which will probably be con trolli ng in this
area ao any delay will not be any disadvantage to the Districts.
Shoul d we los e when it is finally heard , a n y appeal we might take will
stay the matter u ntil November wh ich is when our c urrent agreement
expires .
Worked on other routine matters of business.
(9) Report of Special Selection Co mmitt ee for Aud it Serv ices
Root asked for a two-week continuance of this item. Will report
at adjourned meeting.
Regarding adjourned joint meetin g, Winn suggested the Boards meet
on March 26 but said he understood there was a confl ict with Inter-
governmental Coordinating Council at 7 :30 . Moved the time to 5 :30
on th e 26th.
-2 -
(10) Items de l eted from CONSENT CALENDAR
(c) Kaywood questioned amount of payment for agreement and
whether this was precendent setting . Was advised the
correct amount is $1 25 and Nisson stated that it is our
property and we have the right to lease it . Didn 't believe
this was precendent setting . Advised that lease provides
for paving of right of way and if we have to tear it up, it
is at no cost to the Districts. Users are subject to 90 -day
notice. Otherwise we would get no revenue and wou1d have
a maintenance problem. Ray Lewis exp l ained method o~. arriving
at lease amount . Svalstad commented that he figured it should
be a little higher . He figured $3 per sq . ft. plus $800 per
year but with paving would come pretty close to that.
Item lO(c) was then moved, seconded and carried.
(e) Kaywood questioned the change order and asked how we can
avoid these kinds of surprises .and who is responsible for
the records. REL explained that Miller Street was deeded to
city and somewhere along the way the records were lost. We
run across this frequently with abandoned lines or lost records,
etc. County has grown so rapidl y and utilities records not up
to date.
Nisson added that legislature and the recent Governor just
passed a law which provides that in the event of such an unknown
utility wh i ch arises during construction, the public agency is
liable effective Jan~ary 1st of 7th of this year.
Scott questioned what was done to cost almost $10,000 . Ray
explained and Scott indicated he understood why then.
Item lO(e) was then moved , seconded and carried~
(1 2) Uniform Connection and Use Ordinance
FAH advised that one of the things that we are talking to the industrial
community about on this ordinance is the charges that will be
established by the Boards by resolution on an annual basis. Reviewed
what numbers are going to be. For M & O, will be charging $45 per MG,
$5 per thousand pounds of BOD, and $10 on suspended solids. Large
water dischargers will have to evaluate whether it is less expensive
for them to put in equipment a.nd recycle their water · as much as they
can. For every ton of BOD will be charged $10 and for suspended solids
$20 per ton. For one paper company service this past year cost them
$43,000. If they continue to operate as in the past, that price will
go to $1 55,000.
Root asked if they were going to be negotiating .directly with staff or
does the .city enter into this. Was answered that· they will operate
directly through our Industrial Waste -Department. $65 per MG on an
average for 0 & M but could go up as high as $305 . Numbers could vary
from $100 to $452. Root added that this was very vital as far as
industry was concerned . FAH advi~ed that we have been working very
closely with LA County and City and hope to be in line with them .
Nisson added that one other feature of thie wastewater ordinanc e
which differs from existing one is that .in the existing one we had a
provision that we would not amend the ordinance 'until we notified
-3-
(38)
everyone who had a permit . That is going to be eliminated . Is
unnecessary and an unreal burden to notify everybody who had a
permit. This proposed ordinance provides that anyone who is
interested and registers to receive notice, will get one. Cities
will be n otified .
PUBLIC HEARING re Annexation No. 8 to District No . 2
Opened public hearing at ~:37 p.m .
JWS read summary of actions
No written nor oral comments.
Closed hearing at 8 :43 p .m.
Resolution ordering annexation was moved, seconded and carried.
(15) Other Business:
Norma Gibbs called a meeting of the Special Selection Committee for
Legal Counsel after the Board meeting that night .
(16) Annexation policy and fee schedul e
JWS advised that the Boards had asked the staff to summarize and
send out additional information on annexation policy and fee schedule .
Districts 1 and 6 not included because they do not have any annexable
territory . Explained each District's annexation policy and fees .
Advised that the staff has submitted summaries of each District's
present policy including what the net worth acreage fee would be .
Also included draft resolution that each Board could consider adopting .
To develop a uniform policy would assist in administration of staff .
Net equity acreage basis seems to be a fair me thod of charging the
area that annexes. Would pay into fixed assets already in the ground.
FAH added that if we are going to have uniform policy, would have
different fees but would be calculated the same way.
It was then moved to adopt resolution by Districts 2 & 7 . Seconded
for 2 & 7.
Moved and seconded for District 3.
Chaput stated that the net worth is not near what the facilities
have cost the District for residences . Not a high enough figure .
Have discussed this before. Not sure new Directors know what they
are voting on. Net worth is what we pay times number of years and
hav e had a lot of inflati on . Mr . Harper said that as far as densities
are concerned, particularly in Districts 2,3,5 & 7, are p icked up with
connection charge of some $200 per unit . Another point is that net
worth figure we are using includes grant monies that will be given to
us by State and Federal government . May not offset all inflation but
does push up the number. Very difficult figure to kee p upgrading .
We aren 't set up to periodically update every year
Took a verbal vote by district . Resolution passed in Distric ts 2 , 3
and 7.
-4-
(39) Santa Ana River Interceptor, 2-14-3
Ray Lewis gave report on 2 -14 -3 . Said it was the staff's recommendati o n
that they be instructed to have plans and specs completed and forwarded
to the Stat e for their review and subsequent grant funding .
It was moved, seconded and carried t o do so .
Chaput then ask ed if this was for plans and specs wi t h the s i ze of
pipe c o ming l a ter. REL said recommendation is for design concept .
Full pipe sizing (?) Chaput complained that they never got to discuss
this. Scott added that he would like to discuss this further too if
Dale thinks they should. MacKain stated that it had been discussed .
FAH asked REL if having the engineer proceed with the design , could
the matter of the pipe size b e deferred t o the me eting on the 26th .
Ray answered yes, was possible.
Nisson advised that there must b e a motion for reconsideration because
thi s was already approved . Wo uld have to recons ider t o change their
action . No one moved t6 reconsider .
-5-
•
...
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11
EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT
MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND
11, OF ORANGE C_OUNTY, CALIFORNIA
This March 12, 1975, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts'
office at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California, being
the time and place for the regular joint meeting of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange·
County, California, and there not being a quorum of said Board
present, the me etin g of District No. 11 was there upon adjourned
by the Sec·retary to March 26, ·1975 , at 5:30 p .rn .
STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) ss. , .
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of
Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify ·that the
above and foregoing .to be full, true and correct ~6py of minute
entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 12thday of
March, 1 975 .
IN WITN ESS WHEREOF, I
day of Marc h, 1 975 .
I""< -... _____ _
r-
this 1 2th
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11
OF ORANGE CO~TY 2 CALIFORNIA
DISTRICT NO. 1
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 2
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DIS'~l.1RICT NO. 3
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 5
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 6
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 7
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 11
Directors present:
Directors absent:
MINUTES OF THl~REGULAR MEETING
March 12, 1975 -7:30 p.m.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
ROLL CALL
Robert Battin (Chairman), Vernon
Evans, Kerm Rima, and Donald
Saltarelli
None
Dale Chaput (Chairman), Michael
Callahan, Ralph Clark, John Garthe,
Beth Graham, Miriam Kaywood, Leonard
MacKain, Bob Perry, George Scott, Joe
Temple, Donald Winn, and Frances Wood
None
Donald Fox (Chairman), Lowell Amo,
Gilbert Arbiso, Jr., Thomas McKnew,
Edward Byrne, Phillip Cox, Norman
Culver, Jesse Davis, John Garthe,
Miriam Kaywood, Robert Nevil, Robert
Root, Sonia Sonju, Bernie Svalstad,
and Harriett Wieder
Laurence Schmit
Don Mcinnis (Chairman) and Thomas
Riley
Howard Rogers
Kerm Rima (Chairman),. Robert Battin,
and John Store
None
Donald Saltarelli (Chairman), John
Burton, Ralph Clark, Milan Dostal,
Vernon Evans, and James Jackman
Francis Glockner
Norma Gibbs
Henry Duke (Chairman) and Laurence
Schmit
3/12/75
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
Fred A. Harper, General Manager,
J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary,
Ray Lewis, William Clarke, John
Thomas, Bruce Taylor, and Rita Brown '-"
Director Carolyn Ewing, C. Arthur
Nissen, General Counsel, Conrad
Hohener, Harvey Hunt, Milo Keith,
Gail Lynch, Donald Martinson,
Donald Stevens, and Bill Hartge
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
was held at 7:30 p.m. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invoca-
tion, the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present
for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7.
DISTRICT 11
Adjournment for
lack of quorum
* * * * * * * * * *
There not being a quorum present
at the time and place for the
regular meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation
District No.
to March 26,
11, the Secretary thereupon adjourned.said Board
1975, at 5:30 p.m.
DISTRICTS 2 ·& 3
Excerpt re Board
appointments rece~_ved
and f'iled
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the minute excerpt from the
City of Fountain Valley be received
and ordered filed, and that the
following representatives be seated as members of the Boards:
DISTRICT 1
District
2
3
Approval of minutes
Active
George B. Scott
Bernie Svalstad
Alternate
Bernie Svalstad
Roger Stanton
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the minutes of the adjourned
regular meeting held February 19, 1975, be approved as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the adjourned
regular meeting held February 19, 1975, be approved as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the adjourned
regular meeting held February 19, 1975, be approved as mailed.
-2-
3/12/75
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the adjourned
regular meeting held February 19, 1975, be approved as mailed.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the adjourned
regular meeting held February 19, 1975, be approved as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the adjourned
regular meeting held February 19, 1975, be approved as mailed.
DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 & 7
Report of the
Joint Chairman
The Joint Chairman announced that
the March meeting of the Association
of Metropolitan Sewerage Agency
members with Congressional representa-
tives in Washington, D.C. regarding proposed amendments to the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act had been rescheduled for
mid-April. He and the General Manager will attend on behalf of
the Districts as previously authorized by the Boards.
Chairman Winn also reported that he was sending a letter to
Senator Tunney urging his support of proposed amendments to the
1972 Federal Water Pollution Control Act allowing use of local
ad valorem taxes as one of several sources of revenue for user
charge systems and would enclose a copy of the resolution adopted
by the Boards in this regard.
DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 & 7
Report of the
General Manager
The General Manager reported further
on proposed amendments to the Water
Pollution Control Act of 1972
(PL 92-500). Of the 25 items originally
considered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for
recommendation to Congress, which had subsequently been narrowed
to three, it now appears as if the ad valorem tax matter is the
only one that EPA will support this year, and even that item is
receiving considerable opposition.
Mr. Harper observed that with the recent Supreme Court-ordered
release of $9 billion in wastewater construction grant funds
previously impounded by Presidential Order, there was now a push
by the Governor's office to get clean water projects in California
off dead center. The State now has $1.6 billion for construction
of water pollution control facilities in California which must
be allocated by September, 1977. Our Districts submitted a Project
Report to meet new requirements in March, 1974, which the State
Water Resources Control Board has not yet acted on, setting forth
a plan to meet the new regulations at an estimated cost of $275
million during the next eight years. The State did, however,
approve a $3.5 million grant for development of a treatment
plant facilities plan and environmental impact statement
-3-
3/12/75
including the 1 MGD Jet Propulsion Laboratory reactivated carbon
wastewater treatment pilot plant. The Districts are under
extremely tight time constraints in order to complete necessary
planning and design work in time to assure receipt of grant fund '-"
commitments by the deadline. The General Manager therefore
recommended that the Boards hold an adjourned meeting later in
March, at which time the entire program could be outlined for
consideration by the Directors.
The Districts' Chief Engineer then gave a slide presentation on
the progress of the 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facility at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, presently under construction.
DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 & 7
Report of the
General Counsel
The General Counsel reported the
Districts had removed Mel Gorham
Electric Company, contractor for
Power Reliability Project at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-20,
project. The bonding
the job wh~ch will be
because of their inability to complete the
company will assume the cost of finishing
completed by Districts' staff.
Mr. Nisson commented on the proposed new Uniform Industrial
Waste Ordinance and noted that his suggested changes have been
incorporated into the draft which was mailed to Directors.
The General Counsel reported that the American Federation of
State, County, and Municipal Employees is suing the Districts
for a Write of Mandate in connection with their request for
recognition as the representative of Districts' employees.
In accordance with standing Board authorization, the Counsel
has engaged the firm of Musick, Peeler & Garrett to represent
the Districts in the suit which will be heard the first week
in April.
DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 & 7
Report of Special Selection
Committee for Audit Services
The Joint Chairman reported that
the Special Selection Committee for
Audit Services will present a
recommendation for the Boards'
consideration at the adjourned meeting to be held later in March.
DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 & 7
Receive and file comments
re draft Uniform Connection
and Use Ordinance, and
refer to staff and General
Counsel
Use Ordinance, be received,
and General Counsel.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the comments of Kerr Glass
Manufacturing Corporation dated
February 13, 1975, in connection
with the Districts' tentative draft
of revised Uniform Connection and
ordered filed, and referred to staff
-4-
DISTRICTS 1 2,3,5,6 & 7
Receive, fife, and reject
amended claim of Kelly Timothy
Kellas re damage or injury
involving Districts' vehicle
3/12/75
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the amended claim dated February 27,
1975, of Kelly Timothy Kellas filed by
Charles A. Price, Attorney for Claimant,
for alleged damage or injury incurred
in an accident involving a District-owned vehicle, be received,
ordered filed, and rejected, as recommended by the General Counsel.
Receive and file staff
progress report on Treatment
Plant Construction projects
and ordered filed.
DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 & 7
Approving License to Occupy
Right of Way with Jack R.
Fenton and Wayne R. Peterson
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff progress report dated
March 6, 1975, on Treatment Plant
Construction Projects, be received
Following a brief discussion regarding
the proposed License to Occupy Right
of Way with Jack R. Fenton, et al.,
and the fee therefor, during which the
General Counsel advised that in his
opinion the proposed action would not be precedent setting, it
was moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 75-37, approving
License to Occupy Right of Way with Jack R. Fenton and Wayne R.
Peterson, a Partnership, and authorizing District No. 1 to execute
said license, in form approved by the General Counsel. Certified
copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of
these minuteso
DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 & 7
Take under advisement
tentative draft of revised
Uniform Connection and Use
Ordinance and authorizing
informal hearings
The General Manager reviewed the
draft revised Uniform Connection and
Use Ordinance dated March, 1975, and
outlined anticipated unit costs to
industry under the proposed ordinance.
State and Federal regulations require
recovery of all Districts' costs which
will be incorporated into a revenue program. Anticipated costs
to industrial dischargers, which are based upon three parameters--
flow, suspended solids, and biological oxygen demand (BOD), may
increase substantially for certain firms, in which case each
discharger will have to analyze his mode of operation to determine
the economics of recycling wastewater within the facility rather
than discharging it to the Districts' system. Mr. Harper advised
that our Districts have been working closely with Los Angeles
County Sanitation District and the City of Los Angeles toward
the goal of assuring that no substantial cost differentials will
accrue to industries in the two counties as a result of their
respective regulations.
-5-
3/12/75
The General Counsel reported that it should be noted that the
provision for notifying all permittees of any proposed change to
the ordinance has been omitted. He felt that this requirement was
an unnecessary burden.on the District, and the new ordinance ~
requires that any persons who wish to receive notification to so
request in writing to the respective District.
Following a brief discussion, it was then moved, seconded, and
duly carried:
That the tentative draft of revised Uniform Connection and Use
Ordinance, dated March, 1975, be received, ordered filed, and
taken under advisement; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the staff be authorized to circulate the
proposed ordinance and to schedule and conduct informal hearings
on said ordinance.
DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 & 7
Certification of the
General Manager re bills
received and ordered filed
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the certification of the General
Manager that he has checked all bills
appearing on the agenda, found them
to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment,
be received and ordered filed.
DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 & 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of Joint Operating
and Capital Outlay Revolving That the District's Joint Operating ~
Fund check registers and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund
accounts payable check registers be
approved for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and that
the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay:
Joint Operating
Capital Outlay Revolving
$ 71,583.59
1,438,986.62
$1,510,570.21
in accordance with the claims listed on pages "I-1" through
"I-4", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
Director Dostal requested that his abstention from voting on
Warrant No. 25254 be made a matter of record.
DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 & 7 Following a brief staff report, it was
moved, seconded, and duly carried: Authorizing staff to proceed
with additional JPL process
development work That the Districts' staff be authorized
to proceed with any additional process
development work on the JPL reactivated carbon process in an amount
not to exceed $100,000, pursuant to the conditions of the State
and Federal Step 1 Grant authorization to proceed with construc-
tion and operation of a 1 MGD reactivated carbon wastewater
treatment process facility.
-6-
DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 7
Consideration of
annexation policy and
fee schedule
policy and fee schedules,
taken:
DISTRICT 2
3/12/75
Following a staff review of the
current annexation policies of the
several Districts, the respective
Boards entered into a brief discussion
concerning the proposed changes in
whereupon the following actions were
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Adoption of annexation
policy and fee schedule That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 75-42-2 establishing
fees and procedures concerning annexations of territory
to the District. Certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Adoption of annexation
policy and fee schedule That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 75-43-3 establishing
. fees and procedures concerning annexations of territory to
the District. Certified copy of this resolution is attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Adoption of annexation
policy and fee schedule That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 75-44-7 establishing
fees and procedures concerning annexations of territory to
the District. Certified copy of this resolution is attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2
Public hearing re
proposed Annexation
No. 8 -Tract No. 4980
hearing open at 8:30 p.m.
The Chairman stated that this was
the time and place fixed for a public
hearing for proposed Annexation No. 8
(Tract No. 4980) to County Sanitation
District No. 2 and declared the
The Secretary reviewed the proceedings to date concerning the
proposed annexation as follows:
PURPOSE OF ANNEXATION
The purpose of the annexation is to provide public sanitary
sewer service for approximately 8 acres of territory proposed
to be annexed in the vicinity of Mallard St~eet and Collins
Avenue in the City of Orange.
PURPOSE OF HEARING
Because the territory proposed to be annexed is presently
inhabited, it is necessary to hold this public hearing to
determine if there is a majority protest against annexation.
This is a result of the developer of the territory failing to
annex the area to the District prior to development when said
property was annexed to the City of Orange.
-7-
3/12/75
If less than 25% of the number of landowners
within territory owning not more than 25% of
the assessed valuation of land therein, and
less than 25% of the voting power of voters
entitled to vote as a result of residing in
or owning property within the territory,
protest, then following the hearing, the Board
may order annexation of the territory.
If more than 25% but less than 50% of the number
of landowners within the territory, or more
than 25% but less than 50% of the voting power
protest, then an election must be held.
If more than 50% of the assessed valuation
or more than 50% of the voting power protest,
then the annexation must be abandoned.
ASSESSED VALUATION AND VOTING POWER:
Assessed valuation of the territory has been determined to be
$394,070.
Number of voters in the territory has been determined to be 5-8.
IF ANNEXATION FAILS:
In the event annexation fails, the Board of Directors on
October 10, 1973, declared their intent to levy a sewer service
charge in the amount of $10 or more per residential unit per
month.
TO DATE, THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS HAVE TAKEN PLACE:
On October 10, 1973, the Board of Directors took the following
actions:
Adopted Resolution No. 73-170-2, declaring a special
exception for Tract No. 4980 and waived District
connection fees therefor;
Denied request of the City of Orange for waiver of
annexation fees on Tract No. 4980;
Adopted Resolution No. 73-149-2, authorizing initiation
of proceedings to annex the territory and setting fees
therefor at one-half the established amount, pursuant
to the declaration of a special exception for said
annexation;
Declared intent to levy a sewer service charge in the
amount of $10 per unit per month if annexation is not
completed.
-8-
3/12/75
On April 24, 1974, the Local Agency Formation Commission adopted
Resolution No. 74-39, declaring its findings regarding the proposed
annexation, approving said annexation, and directing County
Sanitation District No. 2 to proceed with the annexation.
(Proceedings have been held in abeyance pendine final corrections
to the map and legal description by the proponent.)
On February 19, 1975, the Board of Directors adopted Resolution
No. 75-20-2, fixing March 12, 1975, at 8:30 p.m. as the date and
time of hearing on proposed Annexation No. 8 -Tract No. 4980,
and establishing procedures for filing of written protest.
Notice of the hearing has been continuously posted on the
Districts' bulletin board since February 20, 1975.
On February 20, documents were mailed to owners of record within
the territory proposed to be annexed, affected cities and
special districts, District No. 2 Directors, and other interested
parties, containing the following information:
A letter of explanation;
A brochure explaining the District's function;
An official notice of the public hearing, including
maps indicating the area to be annexed and a copy
of the resolution fixing the hearing
Legal notice of the hearing was published in the Santa Ana
Register on February 26 and March 5, 1975.
To date, no written protests have been filed with the Secretary.
The Chairman then asked if anyone in the audience wished to be
heard or file an oral protest concerning the proposed
annexation.
There being no oral comments or protests, the Chai·rman then
declared the public hearing closed at 8:43 p.m.
DISTRICT 2 Following the public hearing, it was
moved, seconded, and duly carried: Ordering annexation of
territory to the District
(Annexation No. 8) That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 75-41-2, ordering
annexation of approximately 7.979 acres of territory to the
District in the vicinity of Mallard Street and Collins Avenue
(Annexation No. 8 -Tract No. 4980 to County Sanitation District
No. 2). Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto
and made a part of these minutes.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried: DISTRICT 1
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors be adjourned to 5:30 p.m., Wednesday, March 26, 1975.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m~,
March 12, 1975.
-9-
3/12/75
DISTRICT 3
Receive and file staff
EE.Ogress reports re
Contracts Nos. 3-18,
3-18, and 3-20-1
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff progress reports
dated March 6, 1975, on construction
of the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4,
Contract No. 3-18; the Imperial
Relief Interceptor, Reaches 22 & 23, Contract No. 3-19; and the
Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 & 6, Contract No. 3-20-1, be received
and ordered filed.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of warrants
That the District's Accumulated
Capital Outlay Fund warrant book be approved for signature of
the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and
directed to pay $322,264.80, in accordance with the warrants
listed on Page "II", attached hereto and made a part of these
minuteso
DISTRICT 3
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to
5:30 p.m., Wednesday, March 26, 1975. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 8:56 p.m., March 12, 1975.
DISTRICT 5
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to
5:30 p.m., Wednesday, March 26, 1975. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 8:56 p.m., March 12, 1975.
DISTRICT 6
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to
5:30 p.m., Wednesday, March 26, 1975. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 8:57 p.m., March 12, 1975.
DISTRICT 7
Authorizing initiation of
proceedings re Annexation
No. 46
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Standard Resolution No. 75-38-7,
authorizing initiation of proceedings
to annex approximately 62.64 acres of territory to the District
in the vicinity of the northeast corner of Orange Park Acres
and Chapman Avenue (Proposed Annexation No. 46 -Tracts Nos. 8799
and 8827 to County Sanitation District No. 7). Certified copy
of this resolution is attac~ed hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
-10-
DISTRICT 7
Approving plans and
specifications for
Contract No. 7-6-7
for Tustin-Orange Trunk
Contract No. 7-6-7, and
copy of this resolution
minuteso
DISTRICT 7
Receive and file staff
progress report re
Contract No. 7-6-6
3/12/75
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Standard Resolution No. 75-39-7,
approving plans and specifications
Sewer, Reach 11 and a Portion of Reach 12,
authorizing advertising for bids. Certified
is attached hereto and made a part of these
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff progress report
dated March 6, 1975, on construction
of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer,
Reach 10, Contract No. 7-6-6, be received and ordered filed.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of warrants
That the District's Operating Fund
and Facilities Revolving Fund warrant books be approved for
signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be
authorized and directed to pay:
Operating Fund
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund
$ 37.11
5,631.00
$5,668.11
in accordance with the warrants listed on Page "III", attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned
to 5:30 p.m., Wednesday, March 26, 1975. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:57 p.m., March 12,
1975.
DISTRICT 2
Approving Change Order
No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Contract
No. 2-18
Following a brief discussion regarding
the problem of undisclosed utilities
encountered in construction projects,
it was moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Carbon Canyon Interceptor Sewer, Contract
No. 2-18, authorizing an addition of $9,955.03 for extra work due
to undisclosed utilities and granting an extension of time of 6
calendar days for completion of said work, to the contract with
s. S. Zarubica, be approved. Copy of this change order is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
-11-
3/12/75
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Accepting proposal of
Clifford A. Forkert for
preparation of rieht of
way documents
That the proposal submitted by
Clifford A. Forkert, Civil Engineer,
dated March 4, 1975, for preparation
of right of way document maps and
records be received, ordered filed, and accepted; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be authorized to direct
the engineer to prepare said documents, on a per diem fee basis,
for a maximum amount not to exceed $7,000.00, in accordance with
the following schedule of fees:
RATE
Hour Day
(1) 40 hours per week, 8 hours per
day, operating from Headquarters:
a. Field Inspector. . . . . . .
Plus mileage.
b. Furnishing Field Superviscr.
. .
. .
c. Furnishing Two-Man Survey Party.
.
.
.
d. Furnishing Three-Man Survey Party.
e. Furnishing Four-Man Survey Party
Travel time after 8-hour work day is
to be charged at the above rates -
e.g., straight time.
(2) AUTHORIZED OVERTIME:
.
a. Time worked in excess of 8 hours
per day (excluding travel time) and
for work performed on Saturday
(maximum 11 hours), multiply above
rates by 1. 3.
. .$18.45
. .$20.75
. .$41.25
. .$60.00
. .$74.00
b. For work performed on Sunday (maximum
11 hours), multiply above rates by 1.6.
(3) PER DIEM:
a. When job location requires men to work
away from Headquarters -Board and room
furnished:
Add $13.00 per day, per man.
$147.60
$166.00
$330.00
$480.00
$592 .. 00
(4) SPECIAL SURVEYING EQUIPMENT -Addition to crew rates:
1. Electronic Measuring Equipment -Long Range: Plus $11 hr'-'
2. Electronic Measuring Equipment -Short Range: Plus $3 hr.
-12-
DISTRICT 2
Receive and file staff
progress reports re
Contracts Nos. 2-15,
2-17-2, and 2-18
3/12/75
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff progress reports dated
March 6, 1975, on construction of the
Yorba Linda Pump Station, Contract
No. 2-15; the Carbon Canyon -Palm
Drive Interceptor Sewer, Reach 2, from Carbon Canyon Channel to
Kraemer Boulevard, Contract No. 2-17-2; and the Carbon Canyon
Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-18, be received and ordered.
filed.
DISTRICT 2
Approving Design Criteria
and Capacity for Reach III
of the Santa Ana River
Interceptor
The Chief Engineer briefly reviewed
the staff report on the Santa Ana
River Interceptor, Reach III, Contract
No. 2-14-3, and summarized the design
criteria and capacities previously
recommended for said project based
upon an E-0 population forecast with the sewer to flow at 0.65
depth of internal pipe diameter. Mr. Lewis recommended that the
Board consider authorizing engineers to proceed with design of
said project in accordance with the recommendation in order that
plans and specifications may be filed with the State and Federal
agencies pursuant to grant funding stipulations.
Following a brief discussion by the Board, it was then moved,
seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff be authorized to direct the engineers to proceed
with design of Reach III of the Santa Ana River Interceptor in
accordance with the staff's recommended design criteria and
capacities dated September 26, 1974.
The Board then entered into a general discussion regarding the
possibility of reconsidering the capacity of the interceptor,
whereupon the General Counsel advised that any motion for
reconsideration must come from a Director that voted in favor
of the original action. Thereafter, no further motions were
forthcoming from the floor. ·
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of warrants
That the District's Accumulated
Capital Outlay Fund wrarant book be approved for signature of
the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and
directed to pay $716,450.56, in accordance with the warrants
listed on Page "II", attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICT 2
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation Dj~r;r t No. 2 be adjourned. The
Chairman then declared the meeting adjourned at 9:07 p.m.,
March 12, 19750
./kN tJl-·y of Directors, ~Sa~i ion Districts Nos. 1,
, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11
-13-
•
WARRANT NO.
~243
25244
25245
25246
25247
25248
25249
25250
25251
25252
. 25253
25254
25255
25256
25257
25258
25259
25260
25261
25262
25263
25264
25265
25266
~5267
~268
25269
25270
25271
25272
25273
25274
25275
25276
' 25277
25278
25279
25280
25281
25282
25283
25284
25285
25286
25287
25288
25289
25290
25291
25292
-293 ~294
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Alex Fish Company, Ecological Research $
All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings, Couplings & Belts
Alpine Aromatics, Inc., Odor Control
Aljac Supply Co., Pipe Supplies
American Backflow Co., Valve Parts
American Soil Company, Lateral Repair
Amoco Reinforced Plastics Co., Freight
City of Anaheim, Power
The Anchor Packing Co., Gaskets
AMSA, Conference Registra~ion
Bancroft-Whitney Co., Government Codes
Banning Battery Company, Batteries
Barnes & Delaney, Conveyor Repair
Bearing Specialty Company, Bearings
Bell Pipe & Supply Company, Controls & Switches
Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair
Don Bogart, Employee Mileage
Broadlicks Art Supply, Drafting Supplies
CS Company, Valves & Freight
Cal's Cameras, Photo Supplies & Processing
Coast Insurance Agency, Insurance Premium
Coast Towing, Towing
Compressor Service, Compressor Parts
Consolidated Electrical Distbrs., Electrical Supplies
Constructor's Supply Co., Hardware
Costa Mesa County Water District, Water
Crest Leasing, Vehicle Lease
Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplies
Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage
Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies
N. A. D'Arcy Company, Freight
c. R. Davis Supply Co., Hardware
Deaver Manufacturing Co., Equipment Repair
John M. Deck Co., Equipment Parts
De Guelle & Sons Glass Co., Glass
Department of General Services, Technical Manuals
Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling
Dodge Truck, Inc., Truck Parts
Ida L. Duesberg, Employee Mileage
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies & Printing
Ecco Equipment Corp., Equipment Rental
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring
Enterprise Printing Company, Cover Stock
Fischer & Porter Company, Pump Parts & Strip Charts
William Fox, Employee Mileage
GAF Corporation, Copier Repair
Gasket Manufacturing Co., Inc., Gaskets
General Electric Supply, Electric Supplies
General Installation Co., Water Heater
Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine Contract 1-1-75
General Teiephone Company of Calif.
Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage
AMOUNT
159.00
423.59
1,060.00
178.61
251.77
675.00
141.40
56.64
71.02
100.00
45.82
156.62
193.33
~48.24
230.44
38.00
21.00
17.74
531.35
315.98
59.00
35.00
72.95
1,252.72
193.79 6.oo
147.28
80.00
25.38
529.05
6.06
81.41
95.40
63.44
181.99
12.72
428.25
82.19
7.80
135.12
820.00
3,000.00
69.91
2,438.58
23.70
214.67
158.18
533.30
64.91
6,326.30
3,111.77
33.90
AGENDA ITEM # 30 L-1 DISTRICT'l'l
WARRANT NO.
25295
25296
25297
25298
25299
25300
25301
25302
25303
25304
25305
25306
25307
25308
25309
25310
25311
25312
25313
25314
25315
25316
25317
25318
25319
25320
25321
25322
25323
25324
25325
25326
25327
25328
25329
25330
25331
25332
25333
25334
25335
25336
25337
25338
25339
25340
2531.t 1
25342
25343
25344
25345
25346
25347
25348
25349
IN FAVOR OF
Graybar Electric Co., ·Electric Supplies $
Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Parts
Hadley's Printing, Printing
George T. Hall Co., Pump Parts
Halsted & Hoggan, Pump
Harbor Fire Protections, Inc., Fire Extinguisher Service
Harrington Industrial Plastics, Pipe Supplies
Harrisons & Crosfield, Freight
Hasty Lawn & Garden, Mower
L. Heitman Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Rental
Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease
Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires
Honeywell, Inc., Strip Charts
Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies, Tools & Hardware
City of Huntington Beach, Water .
Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Equipment Rental
Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware
Irvine Ranch Water District, Water
Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supplies
King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, Bushings & Pipe Supplies
Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies
Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware & Tools
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Hardware & Tools
L & N Uniforms Supply Co., Uniform Service
The La.cal Company, Inc., Pump Packing
Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Equipment Parts
R. H. Landin Graphics, Printing
Jim Lankford Company, Adapter
Larsen-Hogue, Equipment Testing
Judy Lee, Employee Mileage
McKesson Chemical Co., JPL Chemicals
McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Hardware
Majestic Fasteners Company, Hardware
Marden Susco, Tools
Meter Master, Inc., Equipment Repair
Charles Meriam Company, Metering Supplies
E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers
Morrison Company, Pipe Supplies
J. Mosher, Employee Mileage
N B Products, Pipe Supplies
National Auto Glass, Truck Parts
National Lumber Supply, Building Materials
Newark Electronics, Tools
City of Newport Beach, Water c. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel Fees
Oakite Products, Inc., Cleaner
Orange Coast Hardwood, Building Materials
Orange Valve & Fitting Co., Hardware
Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies
Pacific Engineers, Piping
Pacific Pipe Tool Co., Ladders
Pacific Pumping Company, Pump Parts
Pacific Telephone Company
Parlcwood Western Distribution, Hardware
M. C. Patten Corporation, Controls
AMOUNT
342.80
102.22
24.9!
69.8~.
725.49
103.71
371.t.29
42.18
45.50
594.oo
429.08
118.95
40.19
526. 29
14 .. 40
407.87
35.99
1.75
729.57
1,085.66
884.56
434.50
130.32
1,574.60
479.17
1.34
301.04
23.3?
178.5~
28.26
818.06
79.15
. 39. 23
42.87
72.12
156.76
186.45
106.93
28.62
969.79
77.33
30.63
234.94
672.08
2,079.90
139.92
112.02
96.68
316.67
834.60
706.07
79.23
344.48 -
63.0~
140.01
AGENDA ITEM # 30 L-2 DISTRICT 11
WARRANT NO.
25350
25351
>352
~353
25354
25355
25356
25357
25358
25359 . 25360
25361
. 25362
' 25363
25364
25366
25367
25368
25369
25370
25371
25372
25373
25374
25375
25376
)377
~378
25379
25380
25381
25382
25383
25384
25385
25386
. 25387
-25388
. 25389
25390
25391
25392
25393
25~07
25395
25396
25397
25398
25399
25400
25401
-c;402
~403
25lto4
IN FAVOR OF
Postmaster, Postage
Preston Weed Control, Weed Killer
Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal
Terry Ramey, Employee Mileage
The Register, Subscription Renewal
Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Aluminum
Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts & Freight
Ruff's Saw Service, Saw Sharpening
SGA Scienti.fic, Inc., Lab Supplies
Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing
Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Testing Supplies
Saylor's Art & Engineering Supplies, Drafting Supplies
Science Applications, Inc., Hazardous Waste Study
Scientific Products, Lab Supplies
Service Motor Parts, Engine Repair
Sherwin Electric Service, Equipment Testing
Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies
John Sigler, Employee Mileage
Signal-Flash Company, Barricade Rental
Fred Sinasek, Employee Mileage
Skil Corporation, Equipment Parts
Smart & Final Iris Co., Supplies
Southern California Edison Company
South Orange Supply, Piping Supplies
Southern California Gas Company
Southern California Water Company
Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water
Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Standard Oil Company of Calif., Gasoline & Oil
Sterling Art & Engineering Supply, Drafting Supplies
Sun Electric Corporation, Equipment Repair
Sunnen Products Co., Equipment Parts
T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Parts
Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage
Technical Book Company, Technical Manuals
Thomason Compressor Corp., Compressor Repair
Margo Thomson, Employee Mileage
Tustin Water Works, Water
Union Oil Company of Calif., Gasoline
United Auto Parts, Truck Parts
United Parcel Service, Freight-Out
United Reprographics, Inc., Printing
United States Equipment,·Inc., Compressor Parts
Utilities Supply Company, Tools & Fire Extinguishers
Patrick Vail, Employee Mileage
Valvate Associates, Pump Parts
Wall Street Journal, Subscription
Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage
Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage
John R. Waples, R. ·S., Odor Consultant
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, E~gine Parts
Whitney's Speedometer Service, 'l'ruck Repair
World Travel.Bureau, Inc., JPL Air Fare
Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing
AMOUNT
$ 500.00
353.78
62.00
59.10
42.00
1, 196. Lf 2
2,013.59
69.68
41.50
61. !i8
40.76
12.50
1,000.00
242.55
242.34
357.50
838.38
7.20
26.00
9.00
36.17
23.09
1,137.04
64.94
1,701.89
3.00
100.05
451.70
8,504.90
26.08
74.79
134.63
118.83
46.62
26.66
70.00
7.50
35.16
107.42
299.40
14.52
66.62
1,666.71
558.57
25.86
140.89
37.96
27.30
47.10
220.80
931.51
7.63
368.73
2, 233 .!i1
AGENDA rrEM # 30 L-3 DISTRICT 11
WARRANT NO.
25405
25406
25224
25225
25226
25227
25228
25229
25230
25231
25232
25233
25234
25235
25236
25237
25238
25239
25240
252Lt1
25242
IN FAVOR OF
Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Service
Zodiac Paper Company, Reproduction Supplies
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
All Bearing Service, Inc., Tools
John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services
Clark Equipment Co., Forklift, A-076
County Sanitation Dist. 2 of L.A., Solids Study
Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16
E.T.I. & Kordick, Retention Contract I-8-3
Forkert Engineering, Survey Pl-16
Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Mgmt. Pl-16
Industrial Indemnity Co., Contractor P2-20
Motorola, Inc., Communication Equipment
Perkin Elmer Corp., Freight
Porter Boiler Service, Inc., Contractor PW-035
Pyramid Fence Co., Contractor PW-039
Southern Calif. Testing Lab, Testing Pl-16
Spectra-Physics, Lab Equipment
Tatkin Company, Metering Equipment · ·
Testing Engineers, Inc., Testing Pl-16
J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Safety Equipment
Twining Laboratories, Testing Pl-16
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF
AGENDA ITEM 1130 L-4
$
$
AMOUNT
1,320.55
85.52
'-"" 71,583.59
$ 141.90
20,134.13
9,450.96
25,000.00
1,234,869.80
79,613.73
1, 81~ 1. 50
11,397.00
8,956.52
1, 579. 40
30.52
33,815.70
3;076. 35
196.20
5,459.00
382.66
l,~~§:g~
679.05
$1,438,986.62
$1,510,570.21
DISTRICT 11
DISTIUCT NO. 2
W~~NT NO.
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
25207
25208
25209
25210
25211
..
25212
25213
25214
25215
25216
2r::0 17
~
25218
25219
25407A
25220
County of Orange, Compaction Testing 2-17-2 & 2-18
Mark Dakovich, Inc., Contractor 2-17-2
J. Putnam Benck, Contractor 2-15
Kasler Corporation & L.H. Woods & Sons, Contractor 2-14-2
Lowry and Associates, Engineering s~rvices 2-14-2, 2-14-3,
2-16-1, 2-17-2, & 2-18
SAWPA, Grant Payment 2-14-2
S. S. Zarubica, Contractor 2-18
DISTRICT NO. 3
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 3-18,
3-20-1, 3-21-1, & 3-21-2
County of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-18 & 3-19
Mike Prlich & Sons, Contractor 3-19
Southern California Testing Laboratory, Soils Testing
3-19
Sully-Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 3-20-1
A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Saliba, Contractor 3-18
A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Saliba, Contractor 3-18
City of Westminster, Facility Relocation 3-18
II
$
AMOUNT
266.10
140,797.80
28,389.48
178,021.00
28,602.55
83,800.00
256,573.63
$ 716,450.56
$ 10,494.50
340.08
52,748.oo
261.72
30,240.00
198,930.50
32,000.00
7,250.00
$ 332,264.80
WARRANT NO.
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
25221 Don Koll Company, Refund Invoice Overpayment
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
AMO~·
37.11
$ 37.11
25'222 Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 7-6-7. $
25223 McGuire Construction, Inc., Contractor 7-6-6
2,256.00
3,375.00
$ 5,631. 00
III
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE HEGULAR
JOIN.T MEE'rING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUN'rY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, AND 7
OF ORANGE COl.JN:L1Y, CAL:LJl"-iRi'iIA
A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors· of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7 of Orange
County·, California, was held at the hour of 7: 30 · p .m.,
March 12 , 19 75 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain
Valley, Califo~nia.
The Cha.innan of the Joint Administrative Organization called
the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum
present for each Distrist's Board.
* * * * * * * * *
·DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the ·Board of
Directors of County Sanitation Dist~ict No. 1 be adjourned to
5:30 p.m., March 26, 1975. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m., March 12, 1975.
DISTRICT 3
Adjournment
Moved, seconded and duly carried: ·
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to
5:30 p.m., March 26, 1975. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 8:56 p.m., March 12, 1975.
',,
DISTRICT 5
Adjournment
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to
5:30 p.m., March 26, .1975. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourne.d at 8:56 p.m., March 12, 1975.
DISTRICT 6
Adjournment
,,
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to
5:30 p.m., March 26, 1975. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 8:57 p.m., March 12:· 1975.
DISTRICT 7
Adjournment
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to
5:30 p.m., March 26, 1975. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 8:57 p.m., March 12, 1975.
DISTRICT 2.
Adjournment
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to
5:30 p.m., March 26, 1975. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:07 p.m., March 12, 1975.
. . .
•
STATE OF CALIFORNIAl
SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE
I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the
Boards of Directors of County Sanitati on Districts Nos .
l, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7, of Orange County, California,
do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full,
true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of
said Boards of Directors on the 12th day of March
19 75
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,·I have hereunto set my hand this
12th day of March, 19 75. )
S-107
l:io cir o s oi .i..i:Lrec: •J on;·
itation Districta No a .
6 , and 7