The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1975-02-18COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX Bl 27. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) January 16, 1975 DISTRICT NO. 5 DIRECTORS AND ALTERNATES: TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 Chairman Mcinnis has asked that you be advised of his intention to call an adjourned meeting of County Sanitation District No. 5 at the following time: SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 1975, AT 12:00 P.M. NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL The purpose of the meeting will be to consider the District's annexation policy. An official notice of the meeting will be sent to you approximately one week preceding the meeting date. JWS:rb cc: Chairman Don Mcinnis Director Howard Rogers Supv. Thomas Riley Alternate Paul Rycoff Alternate Ralph Diedrich COUNTY. SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX Bl 27, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) January 21, 1975 NOTICE OF MEETING CHANGE DISTRICT NO. 5 DIRECTORS AND ALTERNATES: Chairman Mcinnis has asked that you be advised of a change in TELE PH ON ES: AREA CODE 714 540-29.10 962-2411 the date and time of the proposed February 15th meeting of County .. Sanitation District No. 5 to the following: TUESDAY EVENING, FEBRUARY 18, 1975, AT 7:30 P.M. NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL The purpose of the meeting will be to consider the Disirict's annexation policy. An official notice of the meeting will be sent to you preceding the meeting date. JWS:rb cc: Chairman Don Mcinnis Director Howard Rogers Supv. Thomas Riley Alternate Paul Rycoff Alternate Ralph Diedrich COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) February 13, 1975· NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING DIST RI CT NO I 5 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 1975, 7:30 P.M. NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL 3300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD NEWPO.RT BEACH, CAL I FORNI A TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-29.10 962-2411 Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of February 13, 1975, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 will meet in an adjourned reg~lar meeting at the above hour a~d date. JWS/cf II MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Di stricb of Orange County, ~alifornia DISTRICT NO. 5 Adjourned Regular · Meeting February 18, 1975 -7:30 p.m. Newport Beach City Hall Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fount~in ·valley, Calif., 92708 Teleprcnes: Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 The purpose of this adjourned meeting is to consider three related items) all of which pertain to the District's ability to fund needed Master Plan facilities. In November, the Board authorized the District's staff to study the necessity of constructing the pro~osed Back Bay Drive Trunk Sewer. This action was occasioned by the receipt of th.e enclosed letter dated October 25th from The Irvine Company, reque~ting an .implementation schedule for design and con- struction of this facility that woulq be compatible with proposed development. · The Distric t 's s taff h as had two meeting s with r e p re sen- tative s of The Irvine Co mpany during whic h ali gnmen t s were discuss ed , as we ll as p o ss i b le mean s o f financ i ng the proj e ct . The Dis tri ct 's fu n d i ng c apabi lity f o r ·capit al i mpr oveme nts within the Dis t r ict i s l a rg e l y d epend e nt on re c eipt o f con- n e ction fees. Cash -f l ow projections h a v e anticipa t e d an annual · c o nnecti o n f ee revenu e o f $12 5 ,000. For th e fir st 6 mon t h s o f th i s fi scal y e ar, we h a v e r e c e iv e d o nly $1 5 ,0 0 0, or 12 %, of tha t b udg et e d f igur e ($125,000). Enc l osed with the agenda materia l is a c opy o f the Distri c t's current cas h -f low p rojections .fo r t h e n e xt f ive year s . The ca 9h p r o j e ctio n s a re n ow be i ng revise d and t h e s t a f f 's updated ve r s i on.will be ava il ab l e at t h e meet ing , as we ll as a re- vis e d s ched ul e o f ·Di strict 's c onst ru ct i o n pro j ects b ased on the l ates t p r i oritie s . I f t hi s fa c i l ity a nd other needed wor k s a r e to b e c o n- stru cted in the near future , th e Boar d mus t c o n s i der several fi nancing alternates , s u ch as , r a i s i ng t h e tax rates , a s u c c essfu l b o n d issu e , or seek f u nd in g from a n o u ts i de s our ce s uch as The I rvine Company , wi t h pay -b a c k provis i ons. Th e staff wil l be prepared to d is c uss t hese a nd ot her a l t ernate met h ods o f fu nding at t he meeting . Fred A. Ha rpe r Ge ner a l Manage r BOARDS OF Dl~Ecrons County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California DISTRICT No. 5 Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 9?i08 Telephones: Area Code 7 1 4 540-2910 962-2411 ====='========================================================================·---~ -II AGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 18~ 1975 -7:30 P.M. NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL (1) Roll Call ·(2) Appointment of Chairman pro tern, if necessary (3) Staff report and further consideration of request of Irvine Company re District's Master Plan facilities and the Back Bay vicinity. See page "A" (4) .Discussion re funding of District·'s Master Plan faciliti es. (Copy of 1974-75 fiscal year budget enclosed.) (5) Discussion re District's annexation policy •. See following pages: Page "B II Page II c II Current Annexation Policy Resolution Summary of 'all Districts' policies and draft Uniform Policy Resolution (6) Other business and communications, if any (7) Conside r ation of mot ion t o adjourn· October 25, 1974 Mr. Fred Harper Orange County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Proposed Back Bay Drive TDlllk Dear Mr. ~arper: 550 Newport Center D,rive Newport Beach, California 92663 (714) 644-3011 FILED Jn ttie Office of the Secretary County Sanitation District No :- NOV 131974 It has been brought to our attention by Don Simpson of Simpson-Steppat that the two 18" diameter s~ctions of the Jamboree trunk sewer (Figure 1) are · rapidly approaching capacity (approximately 4.3 mgd). On reaching capacity in these lines it would seen necessary to construct the proposed Back Bay Drive backbone sewer facilities C-1 and C-2 identified in OCSD No. 5 Master Plan Revision, December 1971. No doubt, the District is aware of this sit- uation and prepared to initiate the appropriate action. However, The Irvine Company is concerned that you may not be fully infonned as to potential in- creases in sewage generation resulting from proposed projects .. The following information is intended to provide the District the basis for an estimate of the generatio~ of additional sewage into the_ Jamboree trunk line within the next five years from proposed Irvine Company developments. · This information represents _current Company plans; however, it does not represent firm corrnnitments by the Company as we are subject to jurisdictional approvals and other elements beyond our control Fiscal Year 1974/75 1975/76 1976/77 1977 /78 1978/79 AGENDA ITEM #3 Overall Absorption Rate Estimate Residential Units Residential Units Multi-family Single Fam.Detchd Single Fam.Attchd Apartments .Corrnnercial 55 60 so 40 160 45 85 130 300 180 115 A-1 150 300 150 80,000 s.f. 90,000 s.f. + 377' hotel rrns 205,000 s.f. 75,000 s.f. 55,000 s.f. + 10 gr acres DISTRICT 5 Orange County Sanitation Districts Page 2 October 25, 1974 It appears that capacity may be reached within the next five year period. However, an accurate determination of excess capacity presently available in the Jamboree line is necessary in order to determine precisely when the Back Bay Drive sewer will be needed. Your cooperation in investigating this matter is requested. We would appre- ciate being advised of the District's implementation schedule for design and construction of the Back Bay Drive sewer th~t is compatible with pro- posed development phasing. It is also suggested that this facility be added to the District's budgeting program as appropriate. If we can be of assistance, please call. Sincerely, William J. Soto Manager -Engineering Planning DMH/r®S:lab AGENDA ITEM #3 A-2 DISTRICT 5 RESOLUTION NO. 70-128-5 ESTABLISHING ANNEXATION POLICY A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING FEES AND PROCEDURES CONCERNING ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT * * * *"* * * * * WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to establish certain requirements for territory seeking a.Dnexation to this District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the proponents of any applicatfon for annexation of any territory to the District shall, as a condition ·to securing approval of _the Board of Directors of the District to such annexation, comply with the following: Requirements: (a) Payment of all.costs ·incurred in processing the annexation. {b) For th~ period beginning September 1, 1970 and ending June 30, 1971, payment to the District of the sum of $310 per acre of territory so annexed. Beginning July 1, 1971, and annually thereafter, the sum to be paid per acre for the ensuing 12 months will be recomputed on the basis of the net worth of the· capital assets of the District per acre.on that date. The date of approval by the Board of Directors of the annexation shall govern the amount of the fee per acre as hereinabove established. (c) That the annexed territory be subject to the terms and conditions of all ordinances pertaining to fees for connection to the District's facilities. (d) Any area within the territo~y _annexed phtll be co_ncurrently wi thdravrn from any Special District which has levied ad valorem ta.xes taxes for sewerage service within the territory to be annexed, to avoid an overlapping taxing entity. (e) The local sewerage system serving the annexation area shall be installed and connected to the District's system without cxpcnsp to the District. AGENDA ITEM #5 B-1 DISTRICT 5 (f) The territory~ upon annexation~ shall be subject to all ad valorem taxes required for the retirement of the existing and future bonds of the Pistrict. Section 2. The amount of annexation fees payable an~ as .· established in Section l(b) hereof may be decreased by the Board of '-" Directors by resolution upon a determination that circumstances· of a particular annexation are such that such decrease is appropriate and in the public interest. Section 3. That the procedures for annexations .of territory to the District shall be as set forth on Schedule "A" attached .hereto and made a part. of this resolution~ and the District's staff is hereby .directed to give to the proponents of any proposed annexation a copy of Schedule 11 A11 outlining the procedures to be followed. Section 4. That the starf be directed to transmit to the Local Agency Formation Commission a certified copy. of .this resolution. Section 5. That the provisions of this reso~ution shall apply to any annexation of territory to the District initiated on or after ~ September l~ 1970. Section 6. That all other resolutions or motions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed and made of no further effect. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting on September 10; . 1970. AGENDA ITEM #5 B-2 DISTRICT 5 ;I> a tI] z t::1 ;I> H t-3 ~ :::s: :it: \J1 () I 1--' t:J H Cf.) t-3 !:d H () t-3 \J1 ( AN!IEXATIO~ l>J:;TP.ICT PO!..IC'I RES. None . 69-17-2 72-6-3 5 70-128-5 6 II one ( SUMMAftf OP DISTRICTS' ANM!UTIOll POLICIU UPECTIVE PROVISION POR llASIS OP ANHEXA-CtJRflEHT ANNEXATION PROVISION POR ESCALATING DATE PROCESSINO PEE TIO~ PEE PEE ANNEXATION PEE 3-12-67 1-1-72 9-1-70 All reea w/ '325 M1n1mUlll All reea v/ $325 M1n1mum All reea v/ $)25 M1n1mu!ll llosed on 1965 ~~timate or Sewer Fac111ties to nerve Rnnexnble territory. Date pn1J governs ree $it28/aCl'I ll~t worth per ocre or t873/acre 01ntr1ct plus $150. Date or Do:1rd approval gc.'lerns ree Het worth per acre or tl.017/aore D~strlct. Date or . Board appro~al governs ree Beg1nn1ng 1-1-70 e1c1lated annually to rerlect EPA Sewer Con:1truc:tion Cost Index for L.A. Area.or minimu~ or tlO/acre (October Index Uaed) Beginning 1-1-7] escalated annuallr based on net worth or D1atrlct pre- ceding June JOth plua Sl50 Begtnnlng 7-1-71 escalated annuallJ based on not worth or Diatrlct on that date NEXT DAT! ANNEUTIOM PU ESCALATES 1-1-75 1-1-75 1-1-n Olf ESCALATION DATS PEI VILL INCREA.S& ( TO: (ESTIMATED} ___ J)ISTRicr llEMARXSI t5211.t U,01' U,150! l 2 , ' Net worth aoreage tee.would be t86Z lt tl50 re1 la oa1tted Net worth acreage r .. would be tl,011 6 No annexable terrltOl'J ra-::ee-:1 -~----------------------------------------------------------~--· -----~-~~--------------------~ 10-9-68 All ree11 w/ $325 M1n1.l!lum Based on 19G6 Est1mate $~28/acre or Trunk Sewer Fac111t1ea to serve anncxable territory. Date paid 11 64-136-11 lO·l-OJ · None r-.::-:----.~~T:"------~:------------&overn~.ree~ B~ncd on 196~ Estimate or Trunk Sewer Fao1li- $66 per 1/- acre w/$75 1111nimum, (Equivalent to S2611/acre) •Acreage teea 1nd1cated allow tor oapacltJ rl&hta aale credit t1e a to serve anne11able territory Beginning 1-1-70 e1c1lated annuallJ to rerlect EPA Sewer Conatructlon Coat Index tnr L.A. Area or •lnl•WI ot SlO/acr1 (October Ind•& Uaed) None 1-1-15 '52-! ft.ulna 1$26- ' 11 Net worth acr••&• t•• would ba t681 Net worth acreage tee would be t•07 Under CW'rent pollc1. have agree .. nt with CltJ ot ~untlngton Beach to oollect teea, DRAFT 2/13/7·5 RESOLUTION NO. ESTABLISHING ANNEXATION POLICY A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY · SANITATION DISTRICT NO._ OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING FEES AND PROCEDURES CON-· CERNING ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to estab.lish certain requirements for territory seeking annexation to this District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the proponents of any application for annexa- tion of any territory to the District shall, as a condition to securing approval of th~ Board of Directors of the District to such annexation, comply with the following: Requirements: (a) Payment of all cost~ incurred in processing the annexation. (b) From the period beginning and ~~~----~~--~- ending ~~--~~---------' payment to the District of the sum of ______ per acre of territory so annexed. Beginning and annually thereafter, the sum to be paid per acre for the ensuing 12 months will be the net worth per acre of the District on the preceding June 30th. The date of approval by the Board of Directors of the annexation shall govern the amount of the fee per acre hereinabove established. (c) That the annexed territory be subject to the terms and conditions of all ordinances pertaining to fees for connection to the District's facilities, and use of said facilities. (d) The annexed territory shall be annexed into an appropriate sewering agency, such as a city, for the purpose of maintaining and operating the local sewer system including pumping stations and force mains. (e) The territory, upon annexation, shall be subject to all ad valorem taxes required for the retirement of the exis~ing and future bonds of the District. AGENDA CTEM #5 C-2 DISTRICT 5 (f) Any area within the territory annexed shall be concurrently withdrawn from any Special District which has levied ad valorem taxes or other charges for the same services within the territory to be .annexed that County Sanitation District No.·~-- will provide following annexation, to avoid an overlapping taxing entity. Section 2. That the procedures for annexations of territory to the District shall be as set forth on Schedule "A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution, and the District's staff is hereby directed to give to the proponents of any proposed annexation a copy of Schedule "A" outlining the procedures to be followed. Section 3. That the staff be directed to transmit to the Local Agency Formation Commission a certified copy of this resolution. Section 4. That the provisions of this resolution shall apply to any annexation of territory to the District initiated on or after Section 5. That all other resolutions or motions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed and made of no further effect. AGENDA ITEM #5 C-3 DISTRICT 5 EXHIBIT "A" PROCEDURES AND FEES FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO DISTRICT NO. Procedure: 1. All requests for annexation MUST be in writing and directed to the Board of. Directors of County Sanitation District No. of Orange County signed by each property owner. 2. Such written request must contain the following: (a) The true and correct and complete legal description and map of the ~erritory for which annexation is ·requested. TAX BILL DESCRIPTIONS AND ASSESSMENT NUMBERS ARE NOT ADEQUATE. The legal description must be typed and submitted on 8-1/2" x 13" paper. The description shall contain within t~e territory described, reference to the existing Sanitation District boundary. The map shall be drawn on 8-1/2" x 13" vellum, cloth or mylar for reproduction. The exterior bound~ries of the territory shall be dimensioned with the bearings of each line noted. The map scale shall be .1 11 = 600' or larger. If the ·area cannot be completely drawn on the 8-1/2" x 13" sheet, the -map shall be drawn on reproducible media not to exceed 13" in height. The north arrow and point of beginning of ·the legal description shall be noted on.the map .. The area of the territory for.which annexation is ·"-' requested shall be noted in both the legal description and on the map submitted. Calculation for the deter- mination of the area shall be submitted or certified by a licensed land surveyor OT register.ed civil engineer. For assistance in meeting these· requirements, direct all inquiries·to the Engineering Department of the County Sanitation Districts. (b). The names, addresses and telephone numbers of every owner within said territory and a designation of the portion or the interest owneq by each person. Upon request by the District, a title report shall be submitted to verify ownership. (c) The assessed value of each separate parcel of land within the territory having a separate assessment, as shown on the last preceding equalized assessment roll of Orange County. (d) The total number of voters, if any, residing in the territory proposed for annexation. AGENDA ITEM #5 EXHIBIT "A-1" to Resolution No. C-4 DISTRICT .2. (e) A statement requesting the District to annex said territory. 3. Fees to be paid, when and how: (a) When written request is filed, it must be accompanied by payment to County Sanitation District No. of Orange County in the sum of $400.00* to cover District processing costs. Should these pro~essing costs exceed. the $400.00* fee, applicants will be requested to deposit the amount of such excess with the District.· (b) There is an $85.00* minimum processing fee·r~quired by the State Board of Equalization and a $10.00* minimum processing fee required by the Local Agency Formation Commission. Upon request, these fees ·and other fees determined to be required by other agencies shall be deposited with County Sanitation District No .. __ for submission to said agencies before the annexation may proceed. _(c) Annexation acreage fee of $ * per acre for each acre to be annexed. This fee is refundable if the annexation fails. The fee is subject to annual escalation on January 1st. 4. It is the policy of the District not to accept for annexation any irregularly shaped territory which consists of subdivisions or proposed subdivisions where isolated parcels of property o~ lots are excluded from or are not included within the territory to be annexed. 5. It m~y be necessary for the proponents to submit an environmental ·impact report in accordance with .the established procedures. All costs of said report will be borne by the proponents. 6. It is essential to allow a minimum of 90·days: from the time formal petition is signed and fees are paid. Positively no use of District sewer lines will be allowed until after date of ~ approval of the prop6sed annexation bj the Board of Dir~ctors. *NOTE: 1. All fees are subject to change. The fee schedule in effect at the time of actual payment of any fee shall apply. 2. The per acreage annexation fee is subject to increase January 1st each year. AGENDA ITEM ff.5 'EXHIBIT "A-2" to Resolution No. C-5 :vi sed 2/1 4 /75 COUNTY SANITATION DI STRI CT NO. 5 REVISED SCHEDULE OF DIS T RICT CONSTRUCTION PROJEC TS Project Rep l ace ·Pwn ps & Sw itchgear at "A" Street Pump S t ation Rep l a ce Pw ips & Switchgear at 14th Street P ump St atio n Rep l a ce Pw:1p s & Sw itchgear at Lido Pump Station Insta ll Valve in Force Main ne ar Lido Pump Stat.i o n *Re pl a ce Pu: ps & Swi tch gear at Rocky Point Pu mp Stati o n *Rep l ace P w:i p s & Swi t chgear at Bitter Point Pump Statio n Re pl a c e Po r tion of Bayside Drive Swer Ba ck Bay Dr i ve Sewe r East Side Bac k Bay Dr ive S ew er Wes t Side Ne w S an t a 1\na Ri v e r Cros s ing Bay Br idge ~ump ·s t a tion Additions Miscc llan e 9 u s P rojects *Pa rtial l y fun d e d by District No . 6 Total 10,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 13,000 1 2 ,0 00 40,000 600,000 227,000 225 ,000 150,000 250,000 1,567 ,000 19 74-75 10,000 10,000 10 J 000 20,000 13,000 12,000 40,000 50,000 165,0 00 19 75-76 400,000 90,000 150,000 50 ·,000 690, o·oo 197 6 -77 19 77 -78 200,000 227,000 1 35 ,000 50,000 50 ,0 00 385,000 277,0 0 0 NOTE: Ext e nsi on of Bays ide Drive Sewer not include d in above. This pro ject to b e funded by Irv in e Company and reimb ursed from connection fees. Reimbursement does n o t conun ence unti 1 line is extended to the c,ity' b o undary. 1978-79 50 ,0 00 50 ,0 00 I I . I I ! . I I Description REVENUE Tax-Rev.enue (at s t ab l e tax r ate of $.259 3) Other Revenue Federal & State Part i cipation Connection Fees Sal e of Capacity Rights Miscellaneous Ca r ry-over from Prev i ous Fiscal Year TOTAL FUN DS AVAI LABLE EXPENDITU RES Distri ct Constructio n Share <Jf Joint Work s Construction Bond Retirement & Interes t Shar e of Joint Op erat ing Dist r ict Operating & Ot her Expend i tures · TOTAL EX PE NDITURES Carry-over Balance to Fol l owing Fisca l Yea r Fun ds Necessary to Meet Conunitments Prio r to Receipt of Tax Apport ionmen t s Fu nd Balance or (D e ficit) One cent on tax rate wi l l raise ( COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 STATEMENT OF PROJEC'.fED CASH FLOW FI SCAL YEARS 1974-75 THROUGH 1978-79 1974-75 1975 -76 $ 8~1 ,000 $ 925,000 777 ,000 808 ,000 30 ,000 65,000 8 ,000 6 ,000 .150 . 000 • 106 ,000 1,9 10,000 2,136 ,000 $3,756,000 $4 ,046,000 $ 165,000 $ 690,000 875 ,000 1,459,000 30 ,000 29 ,000 200,000 231 ,000 350,000 356,000 $1 ,620,000 $2,765 ,000 $2,136,000 $1 ,281 ,000 1,382,000 1,646,000 $ 75 4,000 $ (365,000) $ 33,982 $ 35,680 Rev . 2-1 8-75 1976-77 1977-7 8 1978 -79 $ 972,000 $1 ,020,000 $1 ,07 1,000 1,735,000 1,583,000 2,168 ,000 102 ,000 141,000 88 ,000 108,000 273 ,000 77 ,Q OO 72,000 67 ,000 1,281,000 875,000 882 ,000 $4 ,16 7 ,000 $3,799,00b $4 ,549,000 $ 385,000 $ 277,00 0 $ 50 ,000 2,208,000 1 ,860 ,000 1,867 ,000 28,000 28,000 27 ,000 336.,000 379,000 392 ,000 335,000 373,000 416,000 $3,292,000 $2 ,917,000 $2 ,752,000 - $ 875,000 $ 882,000 $1,797 ,000 1;458,000 1,37fi ,OOO 2 , 117 ' 000 $ (5 8 3 ,000) $ ( 494 ,000) $ (320,000) $ 37,464 $ 39,338 $ 41, 30 5 \ February 14, 1975 Mr. Don Mcinnis, Oiainnan of the Board Orange Cotmty Sanitation District #5 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: OCSD #5 Annexation Fees Dear Mr. Mcinnis: lH: IRVINE COMPANY 550 Newport Center Drive Newport Beach, California 92663 (714) 644-3011 It is our understanding that the Board of OCSD #5 is considering ra1s1ng the aIUlexation fees for Sanitation District 5 from $1,017/acre to approx- inlately $1,150/acre. We would like to suggest that the District re-evaluate its current method of establishing annexation fees in order to maintain equity between land currently within the District and potentially aIUlex- able land. 1be currently proposed annexation fee of $1,150/acre is more than twice as much as other local sanitary districts, including OCSD's 2, 7, 11 and the Irvine Ranch Water District. At the tinle the District originally estab- lished an annexation fee policy in 1970, the fee was only $310/acre. Even considering additional facilities and the effects of inflation, we question the increase in annexation fees from $310/acre to $1,150/acre in only five years. If an tmdeveloped area with an average market value of $20,000/acre (assessed at $5,000/acre) had annexed to the District in 1970 at $310/acre, remained and paid taxes at the District's average rate, to date the District would have received total revenues including the annexation fee of less than $400/acre from this land. By comparison, as we noted above, annexation to the District is now proposed to cost $1,150/acre. Apparently, the District's annexation fee is based on the net worth per acre of the entire District. Although we agree with the concept of a "buy-in" cost and understand the objectives of generating additional funds for construction of facilities, equity should be maintained. Orange County Sanitation District #5 Page 2 February 14, 1975 Since the District's connection charges are prestunably used to finance trunk sewers, it does not seem appropriate to include these facilities in the annex- ation fee calculation. Otherwise, the annexed area is, in essence, paying double for tnmk sewers on a proportional basis through annexation fees and through assessment of connection charges. Further, since the net worth of the District includes facilities of no benefit to the annexing lands and which may have already been paid for, additional inequities are created by the present method of establishing annexation fees. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, or~r~r- Williarn J. Soto Manager -Engineering Planning CC: Mr. Fred Harper, Orange County Sanitation Districts [pJm:@EDVE(t] FEB 181975 County Sanitation Districts of Orange Ceunty February 14, 1975 Mr-. Don Mcinnis, Chainnan of the Board Orange County Sanitation District #5 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Back Bay Drive Tnmk Sewer Dear Mr. Mcinnis: lH~ IRVINE COMPANY 550 Newport Center Drive Newport Beach, California 92663 (714) 644-3011 In the interest of cooperation with the District, The Irvine Company has ex- pressed concern regarding the need and scheduling of the subject facility. It is our understanding that this matter will be discussed at the scheduled Board meeting on February 18. 'Ille Back Bay Drive tnmk sewer has been included in the District's 1975/76 Capital Improvement Program and will replace an interim facility (Big Canyon pump station/Jamboree force main). Based on information the Company received from District staff, this interim facility has more than outlived its useful life and must be replaced by constructing the ultimate master plan facility (Back Bay Drive trunk). The fact that a major trunk is operating at rnaximurn capacity and is dependent on 24 hour pumping to maintain pace with existing inflow is certainly justification for concern. The Company has provided District staff with TIC development projections for areas tributary to the Bay Bay trunk sewer. In addition, we have submitted projected connection charges from Irvine Company developments within OCSD #5 as an aid in forecasting District income. It should be noted that the major- ity of the additional development is not from new projects, but a buildout of existing or approved projects. We urge the Board to take action to insure timely construction of the Back Bay Drive trunk. We are aware of the District's funding difficulties. How- ever, this capital project is a District responsibility and whatever steps are necessary to enable the District to finance design and construction of this master plan facility should be undertaken. Considering the above condi- tions and in view of economic circumstances The Irvine Company does not con- sider it appropriate to loan or advance funds to the District to provide fin- ancing of this public master plan facility as has been suggested infonnally by staff. However, we do offer our full cooperation in establishing the align- ment, rights-of-way needs, design parameters and implementation for this project. --,- Orange County Sanitation District #5 Page 2 Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, if~Jµr William J. Soto Manager -Engineering Planning MDS:lab cc: Mr. Fred Harper, Orange County Sanitation Districts February 14, 1975 1m~cm:nv~~ FEB 181975 County Sanitation Dist.Ku of O_rang~ Ceunty MEETING DATE Feb. 18 ~ 1 975 TI;"1 E 7 :30 p .m . DISTRICTS _...::.5 ______ _ DISTRICT 1 (DIEDRICH) •••• BATTIN· •.••• ------ (GARTHE) ······EVANS······· ------ RI MA········ ------ (LANGLE.Y) •••• ·SALTARELLI·· ------ DISTRICT 2 (~ ) NG) ••. · • • ·CHAPUT· · • • · • -·----- ( CT'ONS) .•• ····CALLAHAN···· -- ___ _ ! DIEDRICH)···· CLARK······· ----__ EVANS)·· · • • • • GARTHE • • • • • · --___ _ NEVI tJ · · · · · · ·GRAHAM· · • · · · --___ _ TH OM) • • • • • • • • KAYWOOD· • • • • __ __ __ FOX) • • • • · • • • ·MAC KAIN • · • • _____ _ PERRY· • • • · • • _____ _ !STANTON)·····SCOTT·······--___ _ PEREZ) • • • • • • ·TEMPLE· • • • • • _____ _ DUNNE)······ ·WINN········ _____ _ (ROOT)······· ·WOOD········ _____ _ DISTRICT 3 (MAC KAIN). • • • ·FOX· • • • · · · · • _____ _ AMO········· _____ _ MC KNEW) • • · • ·BLACKMAN·· · · _____ _ !NU I JENS)···· ·ARBI SO······ _____ _ COLLINS)···· ·BYRNE······· _____ _ HOMRI GHAUSEN) COX·· • • • • · • • _____ _ CULVER······ !MEYER) ·······DAVIS·······====== EVANS) ·······GARTHE·· ••• · TH OM) • • • • • • • ·KAYWOOD • • • • • ------ IV I') UNG) ••••.• ·NEVIL ••••••• ------ ~D) ········ROOT ········ ------ DIEDRICH) • ···SCHMIT···· · • ------ LACAYO) • • • • • ·SONJ U • • • · • • • ------ SCOTT) • • • • • · ·SVALSTAD • • · • ------ (COEN)······· ·WIEDER······== == == DISTRICT 5 . (RYCKOFF) ••••• MC INNIS •••• ___:{__ ---- (DIEDRICH) •••• RI LEY ••••••• + --__ ROGERS •••••• _____ _ DISTRICT 6 RIMA········ ------ (DI EDRI Ct-f) • • • ·BATTIN······ _____ _ (MC INNIS)···· ·STORE ······· _____ _ DISTRICT 7 LANGL(:Y ••••• SALTARELLI • • ------ PRYOR) ••••••. BURTON ••••• • ____ -- DI EDR I Cl-{) • • • ·CLARK • • • • • • • __ ---- (MC INNIS)···· ·DOSTAL······--___ _ (GARTHE) ······EVANS······· ____ -- GLOCKNER····--___ _ (. qEz) · • • • • • ·JACKMAN • • · • · _____ _ DISTRICT 11 ~COEN) • • · • • • • ·DUKE • • • • • • • • - - - COEN) ········GIBBS • • • • · • • ------ DIEDRICH) •• • .SCHMIT • • • · • • ------ DI STRl CT 8 MITCHELL ;···--___ _ (JOHNSON) • • • • ·HOLM • • • • • • • • ------ (DIEDRICH) ····RILEY·······------ 2-19-75 -- JOINT BOARDS (DUNNE) • • · • • • WINN· • · · · · · · ___ _ AMO· · · · · ..•. NUIJENS) • • • • ARBISO· •••• · ---- DIEDRI~H) • • • BATTIN······==== MC KNf;.W). · • • • BLACKMAN···· ___ _ PRYOR)······ BURTON······ COLLI~S) ····BYRNE·······==== LYONS • • • • • • CALLAHAN· • • · ___ _ EWING ······CHAPUT······ DIEDRICH) • • • CLARK······· ---- HOMRI GHAUSEN) COX· • • · • · • · · ---- CULVER······ ---- !MEYER) • · · • · • DAVIS· • • · • · • ---- MC IN.NI s). • • • DOSTAL· • · • • • == == COEN) • • • · · · • DUKE· • • • • · · • GARTHE) • • • · · EVANS· • • • • • • ---- MAC KAIN). · • • FOX· · .. • • · • • • ---- (EVANS) • • · • • · GARTHE • • · • · • ---- (COEN)·· .. ·•· GIBBS·· .. ·•• --------GLOCKNER·· · • (NEVIL) •••.•. GRAHAM ••.•.• ---- !PERE?) •••••• JACKMAN ..••. ==== THOM) • • . . • • • KAYWOOD •.•.• ___ _ FOX) . • . • • • • • MAC KAIN .••• RYCKOfF) •••• MC INNIS ..•• ---- (YOUNG) •••.•. NEVIL .....•• ---- PERRY •••.••. ---- (DIEDRICH) ... RILEY ....••• ---- (WOOD) ••••.•. (LANGLEY) •... I DIEDRIC~) ••• STANTON) •••• LACAYO) ••••• MC INNIS) •••• SCOTT) .••••• !PEREZ) •.•••• COEN) ....... ROOT) •..••• ·• OTHERS RIMA ........ ---- ROGERS ...... ---- ROOT ..•...•. ---- SALTARELLI •. ---- SCHMIT .•..•. · ---- SCOTT ....... ---- SONJU ....•.• ---- STORE ...... I ---- SVALSTAD .... ---- TEMPLE ...... ---- WI EDER •.•••• ---- WOOD •....... ---- HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS CLARKE TAYLOR BROWN NISS ON EWING HOHENER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY LY NCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVENS COUNTY SANITATION DIS'l1RI CT NO. 5 fUNU"l.1 E3 OF ADJOURNED REGULAH EEETING p.m. 10~44 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Pursus.nt to a-~.·.-::.~.:.:·:.:-:-_::·::'.~; o~ th·:; :'<:1~l2.1' ::· ~~;~:Lr.g :le11.:. :\:jbruar:.· -~, 1975, the Board ot Lirectors of Co~nty Sanitati.cr.. District No. 5 o:' Orange County, Cali1'ornia, met in an adjourned regular rr:eeting at the above hour.and date, at the Newport Beach City Hall. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:30.p.m. The roll was called, and the Secretary reported a quorum present. DIRECTORS PRESENT: DIRECTORS ABSENT: STAFF MEIVT.BERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Don Mcinnis (Chairman), Thomas Riley, and Howard Rogers None Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary, and Ray Lewis Mike Swan and Dane Styles * * * * * * * * * * * Consideration of alternative means of financing Master Plan facilities The s~~ff reviewed the existing facilities serving the Back Bay drainage area of Newport Beach, and the proposed Master Plan Back Bay Drive sewer and Additions .to the Bay Bridge Pump Station. The revised cash flow estimates reflect current economic trends of reduced revenue and increased cost~ which project a significant deficit in the future unless additional funding is forthcorring. The Board then discussed alternative means of financing the Mas~er Plan facilities. During the discussions, the Chair recognized representatives of the Irvine Company which had inquired regarding the financing of the Back Bay Drive Trunk Sewer, East Side. It was then moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the letter from the Irvine Company dated February 14, 1975, regarding the Back Bay Drive Sewer be received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the staff be authorized to enter into discussi(!)ns with the Irvine Company to explore viable alternatives of funding District's Master Plan facilities, principally the Back Bay Drive Sewer, East .Side; and, FURTHER MOVED: That representatives of Irvine Company attending the meeting be requested to thoroughly advise the Irvine Company and its Chief Executive Officer of the District's funding requirement~; . i. ! .. #5 2/18/75 Ee af f .:_ t':::i r.r-~ Dis tr:Lc t ';;:; · anncxG.t;lon policy awl a c: -i ~) t 5. ·= n c f r c: s ·.J l t :_ '": ~-0 r1. therefor Fol:owing a staff review of the District's current annexation.policy and the relation:~hip tc". the poli·.~lr-3 of the several Districts of the Joint Administrative Organization,_ the Board entered into a general-·d-iscussion of said policy and its fu~damental concepts. It wa~ then movep, seconded, and duly carried: That the letter from the Irvine Compc.ny dated February 14, 1975, r~garding the District's annexation policy be received and fi~ed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby reaffirm its policy and adopt Resolution No. 15-15-5, establishing annexation policy. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. · Adj ournr::e nt Moved, seconded, and-duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors-of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned at 8:20 p.m. The Chairman then adjourned the Board to February 19, 1975, at 7:30 p.m. ATTEST: Chairman of the Board of Directors, County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California Secretary of the Board of Directors, County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California -2-