Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-10-16COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) Gentlemen: October 10, 1974 NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 & 11 WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 1974, 7:30 P.M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 The next meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 11 of Orange County,. California, will be held at the above hour and date. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 --'-'-------------------------,-----·------- P. 0. BOX Bl 27, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) OCTOBER 3, 1974 OCTOBER MEETING DATE REMINDER OCTOBER 16, 1974 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS, l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 & 11 JOINT CHAIRMAN WINN HAS ASKED THAT YOU BE REMINDED THAT THE DISTRICTS WILL HOLD THEIR OCTOBER JOINT BOARD MEETING ON WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16TH, RATHER THAN OCTOBER 9TH. AGENDA MATERIAL WILL BE MAILED ON THURSDAY, OCTOBER 10TH, PRECEDING THE MEETING DATE. MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County San itation Dist ricts of Orange· Count y, California JOINT ·eoA RDS Regular Meeting October 16, 1974 -7:30 p.m. Post OHice Box 8127 10844 El I is A ve nue Fountain Valley, Cal if., 9 270 8 Te lephones: Area Code 7 1 4 540-2910 962-2411 The followin g is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not o t herwise self-explanatory . Warrant lists are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediate l y preceding the meeting, but will appear in the Supplemental Agenda available at the meeting. Jo i nt Boards Nos. 8 and 9 -Report of the Executive Committee and Actions on t h e Committee 's Recommendations. The Committ ee met on October 2nd and a written report of the meeting together wi th the recommendations to the Joint Boards is in- cluded with the agenda material. No . 10 -Consent Calendar. The foll ow ing item s fall into this category in ac cordance with the definition established by the Boards : No. 10-a -Change Order No. 4 ~o the Plans and Specifications for J ob No . P2-2 2 . This change order authorizes an extension of contract time of 61 calendar d~ys for delays experienced by the contractor on the delive r y of equipment . It is recommended that the change order be appr oved as the contractor 's request for the time extension is justified and will not affect the contract price. No. 10-b -Acceptance of J ob No . P2 -21 as Complete. Res o luti on No . 7 4 -1 28 accepts Di g est e rs "N" and "O" at Plant No. 2 as complet e and a uthorizes e xecution and recordation of a Notice o f Completion, and approves a Final Closeout Agreement with the contractor . We h ave been pleased with the performance o f the contrac tor , Hemisphere Constructors, of Bellflower. No. 10-c -Purchase of Three Electric Carts. The Districts advertised for the purchase of three electric carts; while we solicited quotations from three firms, only one bid was received ($5,855.17). In the current budget, we budgeted $5,724 for carts for our Operations Department. The staff recommends that a Purchase Order in the amount of $5,855.17 be issued to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company. No. 10-d -Interdepartmental Transfer of Personnel. We are requesting that one Mechanic II position be moved from the Mechanical Division to the Maintenance Division. ·Approval of this -request will enable us to provide the needed number .of personnel re- quired in the Maintenance Division without adding any additional positions or personnel. District No. 2 No. 10-f -Proposal of Lowry and Associates for-Design Services for the Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reach 3. In accordance with the instructions given the staff by the Board on October 2, an engineering design proposal has been received from Lowry and Associates. It is the staff's recommendation that the proposal be accepted, with the provision that the General Manager be authorized to limit the engineers' scope of work to that portion of Reach ·3 from the terminus of Contract No. 2-14-2 in La Palma Avenue to Imperial Highway. It is recommended that t h e design of the remaining portion of Reach 3 from Imperial Highway to the Co u nty boundary be de- ferred until receipt of project conceptual approval from the State Water Resources Control Board and the Environmental Protection Agen~y. No. 10-g -Change Orders Nos. 3 and 4 to Contrac t No. 2-1 4 -2. Included with the agenda material are two change orders to Con- tract No. 2-14-2 for additional work required by the contractor on the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Katella to La Palma Avenues. It is recommended that the additional costs and time extension therefor be approved as described in the change orders. No. 10-h -Pipeline License Agreement for Contract No. 2-17. The staff has worked out an agreement with the Santa Fe Railway Company for right of way in connection with .con struc t ion of the Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer. The Company has agreeq to a License Agreement for a one-time cost to the Districts of $150. The staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 74-132-2. ... District No. 2 No. 10-i -Proposed Annexation No. 11 -District No. 2 . ·· ... -.·· . -~ . The staff has reviewed the request for annexation of Tract No. 8713 which is located in the City of Anaheim. A tentative map for the construction of 10 homes on half-acre and larger lots has been approved by the Anaheim City Council. The proposed densities are consistent with the District's Master Plan of Sewers; therefore, it is recommended that the Board authorize initiation of proceedings to annex the area to the District. District No. 3 No. 10-1 -Award of Contract· No. 3-20-1. The standard resolution appearing in the agenda awards the .con- tract for construction of the Knott Interceptor Sewer, Reaches 5 and 6, to Sully-Miller Contracting Company in the amount of $4,602,992. Six bids were received and it is the staff's recommendation that the contract be awarded to the low bidder. No. 10-m -Claim Against the District. "The District has received another legal document in conjunction with a claim which has been filed against the District and the City of Westminster. The action in the ·agenda refers the matter to our General Counsel and the District_s' liability" insurance carrier for appropriate action. District No. 7 Nos. 10-p-q-r -Annexations to the District. The three actions appearing on the agenda are standard resolutions authorizing the initiation of proceedings to annex territory to the District. Proposed Annexation No. 42 encompasses 23-plus acres on which single-family residences will be constructed. The development densities are in conformance with the District's Master P~an of Sewers. Proposed annexations Nos. 43 and 44 are for two single-family residences; one encompasses three-quarters 9f an acre, while the other is one acre. The proposed densities anticipated for these properties conform to the District's Master Plan.· It is therefore recommended that the three standard resolutions initiating annexation proceedings be approved. District No. 11 No. 10-s -Proposed Annexation No. 18 to the District. Pursuant to the Board's instructions, the staff has reviewed the request of Standar.d Oil Company of California for annexation of approximately 44 acres of territory in the vicinity of Ellis Avenue -3- - extended, easter ly of Edwards Street. This area should logical l y be served by District No . 11 and t he City of Huntington Beach . Dur i ng t he course of reviewing this r equest fo r annexation , it was apparent that the annexation fees adopted in 1964 do not re f lect the true curr ent costs for p r o v iding service to the area ; therefore , i t is r ecommended that the Board direct the staff to evaluate the present annexation policy and fee schedules and approve Reso l ution No . 74 -138-11 a uthor izing in i tiation of proceedings to annex the proposed Bo l sa Lease annexation subject to fees which will be determined following receipt of the staff eva l uation report. Jo i nt Boards No. 12 - Approval of Ass i gnment of Agreements . Th e Chino Basin Municipal Water District has requested assignment o f t heir agreements with District No . 2 and t he Joint Boards for waste - water interceptor capacity and wastewater treatment and disposal c apacities to the Santa Ana Watershed Pro je ct Authority (SAWPA). SAWPA i s a joint powers authority whose members are, the Chino Basin Municipal Water District , the Orange County Water District, Western Mun icipal Water District and the San Bernardino Municipal Water District . This agency has been established to construct the Upper Basin wastewater collection facilities and is recognized by the State. Water Resources Control Board and the Env ironmental Protection Agency as the contract- i ng agent for the Upper Basin . It is therefore recommended that the assignment agreement be approved in form acceptable to the General Counsel. No . 13 -Report of the General Counsel re: Additional Land Acquisition· at Treatment Plant No . 2 (Eight -acre Parcel and Three - Acre Parcel). . The General Counsel will d i scuss certain lega l ram i fications con- cerning the actions taken by the Board and staff to date. No . 14 -Amend i ng Rules and Regulations re: Conditions of Employm ent . Our Payroll Department has experienced considerable difficulty computing the overtime premium pay in accordance with the Federal Guidelin es , i .e ., time -and -a -half for eligible employees for work performed in excess o f 40 hours ac tually worked per week . Our attempt to follow the precis e provisions of the Federal law has result ed in considerable extra cost f or account ing personnel and has led to con- fusion and dissatisfaction among our employees . Th ereYore , I am recommending that the overtime provisions be changed , effective October 1st , to provide that all eligible employees be paid time -and -a -half for all work performed over and a bove their regular work schedules, including hol idays, whether or not they worked 40 hours in that week . We bel i eve the additional expense to the Districts wil l be negligible, in that the extra payroll accountin g time will be eliminated . -4- ' ' I t ! I i t · I I ~ ...... No. 17 -Consideration of Action re: Bids on Job No. J-6-1. On September 5th, we opened bids for the construction of two ocean outfall engine-driven booster pumps. The engineer's estimate was $1,390,000 million and only one bid was received ($1,678,700). The .staff has been evaluating this bid and as of now, we are not in a position to recommend award of the contract. An agenda item will appear on the Supplemen~al Agenda recommending a course of action at the meeting. District No. 3 No. 41 -Review of the District's Master Plan of Interceptor Sewers. The District's engineer will report on the construction progress to date and give an over-all review of the future construction re- quired to complete the District's Master Plan and its relationship to the needs of the various communities in the west and north ·portions of the District. No. 42 -Report on Requests for Modification of the District's Master Plan. Earlier this year, the District received requests from the Cities of Cypress and Buena Park, requesting that additional interceptor sewers be constructed to serve their communities. The District's staff and engineers have reviewed the requests and will report their recom- mendations to the Board. No. 43 -Request for Proposal for Engineering Services. It is the staff's recommendation that we begin the design of the facilities desc~ibed in the District's Master Plan to provide the sewage capacities necessary to serve the needs of the westerly portion of the District, which encompasses Los Alamitos, La Palma, and portions of Cypress. -5- Fred A. Harper General Manager STATE CAPITOL SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 9:5814' T~• (911ll 44~28~ COMMITTSIES 9UalN-a ANO ~OJ'l'.SSIONS HZALTH AND WELFARE PuaL.JC E:MPl..CYMENT AND Dl11T1'1CT 01'1"1Clt JAMES E. WHETMORE llAHK OF AMERICA BUILDING &UITlt 312 TH1'n'Y·FIFTH SENATORIAl. DISTRICT ORANG£ AND 1..0S ANGEL.£5 COUNTIES RETIREMENT T--P09'TATION ..m..ECT C:O...M~S 0 SOUTH HA,.80" BOULKVARO ~_..HEIM, CALIFORNIA 9280:5 'TIU.,tpftONl!1 (71.Cl 891.114'0 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE CHAIRMAN SENATE COMM1TTEE ON PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT AND RETIREMENT September 26, 1974 !-1r. Donald Winn, Chairman Joint Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 ·Dear Hr. Winn: .5M41.1. BUSINESS ENTl[llPRtaES CHJ.UHt&N AND YOUTH 5'.IBCOMM ITTll:IUI NUT1'1TION AND HUM"N NltEDS INYEST...wT OP' ~UBI.IC FUNDa ~nn' COtOUTTKES EDUCATIONAL GOALS AND EVAWATION SmslilU: SAl"ETY aOAIU>a AN.D COMlollS510N9 CALIFORNIA COlolMISSION ON ACINO AMEfllCAN REVOLUTION atCl!NTENNIAL COMMISSION 'D11' CALtl"ORNIA ~J.A EKlt"CENCY COUNCIL My Administrative Assistant, Bob Eichenberg, has told me how impressed he was with the dinner meeting and tour of your Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach facilities. I have it from a number of friends who ·are members of your Board of Directors that we have one the most efficient, w~ll-run set of sanitation facilities in the country. I am sorry that I was not able to be there to see the presentation. One factor that Bob mentioned is the pride that all the people showed who were associated with the operation of the facilities. An administration that can engender such pride and norale has done much to insure the continued· effective operation of a very complex system at the least cost to the ta~q>ayers. You, your Board of Directors, the administrators, and the individual workers are to be congratulated for your excellent performance. I realize that the future poses problems with' regard to population growth and the more restrictive standards of the EPA.. I know you will be able to overcome these challenges, and I will be happy.to heln wherever I can. Again, thank you for the hospitality shown my representative. Cor~~~y yours, _L. ---- //~ (_. lt_1 · L~ .. ~--C JJLIBS E. HHETr:oRE Senator, 35th District JT.-V/kr ~13 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN THE SEPTEMBER 25TH DINNER MEETING AND TOUR OF THE SANITATION DISTRICTS' FACILITIES WAS VERY SUCCESSFUL, 92 ELECTED OFFICIALS AND CITY ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PEOPLE ATTENDED. MANY STATE LEGISLATORS WERE INVITED; HOWEVER) THE GOVERNOR CALLED A SPECIAL SESSION OF THE LEGISLATURE IN SACRAMENTO THAT DATE) SO THEY WERE UNABLE TO ATTEND. A LETTER FROM SENATOR WHETMORE WAS INCLUDED IN YOUR AGENDA MAILING) WHICH COMPLIMENTED US ON OUR FACILITIES AND THE ENTHUSIASM OF OUR EMPLOYEES. Ar THE PRESENT TIME) WE ARE NOT PLANNING AN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING FOR THIS MONTH. II FILE ................ - LETIER ············- A/C .... TKlR •••• ••••••••••••••h•ooouo._ -H•-•OOOH-0 0 .... 0- BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitat ion Distric:ts of Orange County , Cal ifo rnia Post OHice Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Foun t a in Va ll ey, Calif., 927 08 Telephones: ·JOINT BOARDS Area Code 71 4 540 -2910 962-2411 AG EM DA ADJOU RNMENTS POSTED .~ COMP & MILEAGE ..... ~ .. FILES SET UP •..... t:::: .......... . RESOLUTIONS CERTIFIED _. ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING LETIEl\S WRITIEN ... .c ..... .. MINUTES WRITIEN ..... \:.: .. _ OC TOB ER 16, 197 4 -7:30 P.M. MINUTES HLED ..... w, ..... - (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessar y ~{i::> -..ctt.1~ ( 4) EACH DISTRICT 'l.• ~·"""" ( ru~~g;·) o'\~ Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 District 2 District 3 (District 5 District 6 District 7 (District 8 District 11 September 11 , 1974 re gular and October 9, 1 974 regular September 11, 1 974 regular, Octobe,r 2, 1974 adjourned and c..i~~,.._. October 9, 1974 regular September 11, 1974 regular and October 9, 1974 regular September 11 , 1974 regular and October 9, 19 7 4 regular September 11, 1974 regular and October 9 , 1974 regular September 11, 1974 regular and October 9, 1974 regular July 10, 1974 re gular and October 9, 1974 regular September 11, 1 974 re g ular and October 9, 1974 regular FILE .................. @ ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman lf·-.... ··----·- A .... TKLR _ / ( {:.. '\ --·-··---\~ ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager ALL DISTR I CTS Report of the General Counsel J (8) M\~ (9) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the me i>.~---····-··-· Executive Committee: W•1·••Q LETIER ·········-· (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and reject A/c .... TKl.R •• the proposal of Golden West Fertilizer Company, dated ···-··---··--h \s September 10, 1974, regarding disposition of Districts' -----·--centrifuge sludge· See page 11 A11 !~···-········· lETIE ··-·--· Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to obtain proposals for providing a security monitoring system for Districts' offices, laboratory, warehouse and shops FILE •. Y .. :.~. " Consideration of Resolution No. 74-127, delegating autho- rity to the General Manager to approve change orders to contracts for unforeseen or unanticipated conditions encountered in connection with contracts for construction of sewerage facilities, in an amount ---LmER ···-·=ilf C II V t C no a o e or ast ~~~~:::~~nanimous Balle~ FILE ···-··-········· lEmll --···- A/C •.•. TXll -· (d) M~ not to exceed $25, 000. See page 11 B11 ( •• ~ ~-41) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report on Analysis of Southern California Edison Company's Electrical Energy Charges, dated September 26, 1974 (10) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on th e consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Roll Call vote or cast Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing unanimous Ballot on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. ALL DISTRICTS (a) A/C -.TKLR .•.• ... ---··-··-··----- Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4, to the plans and specifications for Digesters 11 N11 and 11 0 11 at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-21, granting an extension of time of 6'1 calendar days to the contract with Hemisphere Constructors. See page "C 11 (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 3 ) -2- (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS FILE ~-r········-c b ) l , _ _::;, 71,,, ~ ~ •••• .:. ••.• l-::'!"-i:::- A/C •••• TKLR ..•• ~~ .. ;.. (,,,,_ ~ L \.,.. ___ ( ___ ....,.. ___ _ FllE .• -.L .. _. •• ( C ) LmER ········-·· .. >JC __ TKLR •••• \. --- FILE ·-·-·····-·· L!nER ···········-· A/C ••• .TKLR •••• (d) f ILE ···-··-······-· LETTER ••••••••..•. ( e) A/C .... TICLR •••• I Consideration of Resolution No. 74-128, accepting Digesters "N" and "O" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-21, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "D" Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase of Three (3) 4-Wheel Electric Cars, Specification No. A-072, to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company in the amount of $5,855.17. See page "E" Consideration of Resolution No. 74-129, providing for change of Mechanic !I's position ($811-$1001) to Maintenance Mechanic II classification ($790-$975), and transferring said position from the Mechanical Division to the Plant Maintenance Division. See page "F" Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress report on Treatment Plant Construction Projects. See page "G" -· --.... D"""'!STRICT 2 ( f) \__ FILE -~---~--/ -t,,L \/ LETI'ER ...b.--·- A/C .••. TKLl •••• ( g) FILE-·-·-· Lm'ER--·· A/C .... na.R ···• FILE •.•. :;:: •...•••••• LETTER ••••• ~ •.•••.•• ~ AJ..C~ 7il'kl:~, ··~ < ~,:>-'.·~~-:_:;;· ' -·-··- ( h) . (i) FILE ······-··-- 1.mER~~::'JI A/C ._TICLR - Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal submitted by Lowry & Associates, dated October 10, 1974, for design of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reach 3, authorizing design of said interceptor from La Palma Avenue to Imperial; and authorizing the General Manager to direct the engineer to proceed with design from Imperial to the Orange County line upon receipt of concept approval from SWRCB and EPA, for a net total lump sum fee of $408,500. See page "H" Consideration of motion approving the following Change Orders to the plans and specifications for the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-2, and authorizing changes to the contract with Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc. A Joint Venture, as follows: Change Order No. 3 -Addition of $4, 488. 75 for u,nanticipated work re utilities location and time extension therefor of 4 calendar days. See page "I" Change Order No. 4 -Addition of $20,500.00 for additional jacked casing pipe and riprap due to Flood Control District activities and time extension therefor of 10 calendar days. See page "J" Consideration of Resolution No. 74-132~2, authorizing execution of Pipe Line License Agreement with the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for right of way in connection with construct-ton of the Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer, Contract No:~~1, See pae;e "K" .J -/ '7-;;l ( ? ) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 74-133-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 7 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Mohler Drive (Proposed Annexation No. 11 -Tract No. 8713 to County Sanitation District No. 2) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- ~ (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) DISTRICT 2 (Continued) FILE •.. --·-- LETTER ·······-···- A/C •• -TKlR ·-· Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress report on construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-2. See page "L" DISTRICT 3 FILE ···-··-······- LETTER ···-········· (k) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to we .. -TKLR -· ---·-(1) FILE 1 •••••••••••••••••• LETTER -~·l'.:f.~~~ we _.TKLR •••. (m) FILE ••••••..•..•....•. @i.t' ~ .. ±-:::::: .. A/C _TKl.R .... (n) i, FILE ¥-:·-··-· -------~-\~'.!\·-:"·,j,,. ~TTER .~··---~-' :;vc-: .. TKLR - the plans and specifications for the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 & 6, Contract No. 3-20-1 Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 74-134-3 to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 & 6, Contract No. 3-20-1 to Sully-Miller Contracting Company, in the amount of $4,602,992.00 See page "M" Consideration of motion to receive and file Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis With Relief From Filing Security for Costs, Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, and Affidavits of Plaintiffs John Inks, John Sherrod and Steve Dale Johnson; and Notice and Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis With Relief From Filing Security for Costs, Case No. 214450, in connection with construction of the Bolsa Relief Trunk Sewer (Reach 10) and Bolsa Avenue Storm Drain, Contract No. 3-17-1; and refer to General Counsel and liability insurance carrier for appropriate action Consideration of Resolution No. 74-139-3, authorizing execution of an agreement for acquisition from the State of California of approximately 1,200 sq. ft. of property located in the vicinity of Westminster Avenue and the /\~~I'll-. ~ -t,r~p •' ~. \: San Diego Freeway, in connection with construction of Westside Interceptor Facilities, Westminster Avenue Inter- ceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-14 (Revised), for the amount of $100.00. See page "N" f ILE ·--···-·····- lET'TfR ·······-···- WC __ .na.R - ------··-......................... ( o) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress report on construction of the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18. See page "O" DISTRICT 7 : FU.E !::~·I!·::·"···· ( p) ------~~ 1.mn~.L~ .. E . ..V wr::. .... neut .. " - . FILE .~::.p·c:e­ -&.Emlt~.~-~-:~.~ A/C ••.• TKLR -- (q) we .... TKLR ··- -~~--: ---·-;..; Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 74-135-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 23.48 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Skyline Drive and Plantero Drive (Proposed Annexation No. 42 -Tract No. 8640 to County Sanitation District No. 7) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 74-136-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 3/4 acre of territory to the District in the vicinity of Cowan Heights Drive (Proposed Annexation No. 43 -Guzman Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 74-137-7 authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 1 acre of territory to the District in the vicinity of Cowan Heights Drive and Sirrine Drive (Proposed Annexation No. 44 -Ursino Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4 ) DISTRICT 11 F1LE ···········-··-· ( s) ( 1) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff LETIER .. ·-·······-report, dated October 10, 1974, re Annexation No. 18 - A/c ..•. TKLR ·-· Bolsa Lease Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 11. See page "P" FI LE ·-····----~ • f~. P1-~TTER ············- A/C .•.. TKLR -· \. (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 74 -138-11, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 44 .19 acres of territory in the vicinity of Ellis Avenue extended westerly of Edwards Street (Proposed Annexation No. 1 8 -Bo l sa Lease Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 1 1), said annexation to be subject to payment of fees established by the Board following a review of the District's annexation policy . FILE··---See page "Q" LETIE~ _/. (..3) ~~dcp ~ .v--- Consideration of motion directing the staff to evaluate the District's existing annexation policy and fee schedule and report back to the Board (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any (12) (a) DISTRICTS 1,3,5,6,7 & 11 @ )50.:(l.) >JC .•.. TKLR .••. ~ ~\- Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Chino Basin Municipal Water District, dated February 13, 1974, requesting assignment of agreement for Wastewater Interceptor Capacity and Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Capacity. See page "R" (b) DISTRICTS 1, 3 ,5 , 6, 7 & 11 Fii f\f\ l> LmER -··········"Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot A/C ._.TKLlt •. :: Consideration of Resolution No. 74 -13b, approving assignment by .District No. 2 of Chino Basin Municipal Water District Waste Water Interceptor Capacity Agreement to the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, in form approved by the General Counsel . See page "S" ---····-·-· -----~ (c) ALL DISTRICTS FILE ···········-····· LmER ···-··-····· IY\ ~_5 A/C •.•• TKLR ·-· .Roll Call Vote or Cast ---·--Unani mous Ba llot FILE ···-·-···· • Consideration of Reso l ution No . 74-131, approving assignment of Chino Basin Municipal Water District Treatment and Disposal Agreement to the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, in form approved by the General Counsel. See page "T " UTTER •....•.•...•• ,......, 8'. 19 -q:a-D l~~ ~ ALL DISTRICTS C: A ~ ~r~~Q.) Report of General Counsel re a cquisition of property immediately adjacent to Treatment Plant No. 2 A/C ._TKLR •••• (14) ALL DISTR I CTS FILE ······1forrcan v~ ~ 6.st UTTER ·-·-{lflMlimous Ballot A/C •••• TKlR •••• Consideration of Resolution No. 74 -140, amending rules and regulations relative to conditions of employment, Resolution No. 70-3, as amended, regarding overtime definition. See page "U" (15) ALL DISTRICTS .Consideration of motion to receive and file certification of the General Manager that he has checke d all bills appearing on the agenda , found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment !OLL CP._L vorr .. ......Jl.6) ALL DISTRICTS (16) Consideration of roll call vot e motion approving Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant books for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1 , and authorizing payment of claims listed on page "I" ITEMS ON SUPPU:MENTAL AGENDA -5- (17) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items ~) Consideration of request to substitute engine and bl.ower ~ assembly subcontractor re 46 MGD Activated Sludge ITEMS ON SUl'PlEMENTAL AGENDA Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-16: (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file the FILED ... ~ •.•....... following: LffiER~.1 (a) A/C ·--TKLR -·· Letter from Donovan Construction Company, Contractor for Job No. Pl-16, dated September 18, 1974, re listed subcontractor, Delaval, Engine and FILE t> .• Y. ...... -.•.•• f V\.\ LETTER ·······-····· ) A/C ••.• TKLR •••• FILE:> .•. ~---····· LETTER -·--···- A/C -.• TKLR ••.• FILE -(t~::.·~ LffiER .-··-·--- A/C .... TKLR •••• ( 2) (b) (c) Compressor Division. See page "IV" Letter from Delaval, Engine and Compressor Division, dated September 26, 1974, acknowledgin g that they are unable to enter into a subcontract with Donovan Construction Company for supplying engine and blower assembly for said contract. See page "V" Staff Memorandum, dated October 15, 1974, recommending approval of the request for delisting of Delaval as a subcontractor for said contract and assigning the responsibility to Donovan Construction Company. See page "VI" Consideration of motion approving the request o f Donovan Construction Company for substitution o f anothe r person(s) or firm(s), including Donovan Construction Company, for the engine and blowe r assembly work for 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-16, ,in accordanc e with Section 4107.5 of the Government Code, with the understanding that there is no change in the specifi- cation or contract requirements. r-~ ( (17-B)) Consideration of bids for Additional Pumping Facilities ~ at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-1: ITEMS ON SUPPt.Etft~T ~LAG.WO .A. :!: .. ~~~~--:~PA b (1) -·-···-·--( 2) A/C •••• TKLR .••• Consideration of motion to receive and file staff memorandum, dated October 15, 1974, re evaluation of said bids. See page "VII" Consideration of Resolution No. 74-141, to receive and file bid tabulation, rejecting all bids for Additional Pumping Facilities at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-1, and directing that said work be accom- plished by force account, pursuant to Section 4755 of the Health and Safety Code; and authorizing the staff to negotiate for purchase of proprietary equipment. ("Section 4755 ..... If all bids are rejected, the district board on a resolution adopted by a four-fifth s vote may declare that the work can b e performe d mor e e conomically by day labor, or the materials or s uppli es furnished at a lowe r pric e in the open market and may have the work done in a manne r stated in the resolution in order to take advantage of this lower cost" ..... ) See pages "VIII" and "IX" -6- (18) DID~HIO~B 1 & 7 Oon~ideratioa of motioa appPoviRg sl::lsperrne fl:lHd warraHto, if m1y. See snpplemental agenda attaefimcfi~ ( 19) DISTRICT 1 (20) ( 21) mMS OH ( 22) SUP PLEMENTA L AG /4 s Con~ideratiofi of motioa approviag warraato, if aHy. See su~~lcmcatal agcHaa attaehment DISTRICT~~ _ O~her bl!P~ness ~~ or supplemental agenda it ~f any DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn q: I~ DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving warrants. See page "II" DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items: .~~~DA Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 74-142-2, approving ~·~ · plans and specifications for Carbon Ca nyon -Palm Drive ct-:=.~ .... Interceptor Sewer, Reach 2 , from Carbon Canyon Channel to ~········· Kraemer Bou l evard, Contract No . 2-17 -2; and authorizin g -··ftt-r ···::.-=-=--·~ advertising for: bids on November 21, 1974 :E~~·:c~24 )(_ ~; ~~ ~~ Consideration of motion to adjourn C(. I~ lli"& Q~I ~ ) SUPPLEMENTAL AGifA5 DISTRICT motion approving suspense fund warrants . ITEMS ON ( 26) DISTRIO 5:::/ suPPLEMENTAL AGENDA Conside ti on of motion approving suspense fund warrants . See page "II" (21\J DISTRIITT ~·------ . °"-=Gther bus :trfess and-C ommunications or supplemental agenda (28) (30) (31) (32) ITEMS ON SUPPLEMENTAL AGENOA IV\\ S. (33) (34) items, if any DISTRICT 5 ' I Consideration of motion to adjourn <?", o--u c.( vv---:=:rN.. lfJ ,g Ct n ~) DIS':PRIC':P 6 Co11side!ation of motiem ariprovin~ warrant~, if a~31. See s ttpplernental a~efie1a attaefiHlcRt DISTRICT 6 Othe !/'ou~nd communfCa:Mon_s_o.r supplemental agenda ite s, ir-~~Y~ ~ DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn q: l'1 DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approvi ng warrants . See page "III" DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda i t ·ems, if any DISTRICT 7 Cons ideration of motion to·.adjourn ~·. \i 35) DISTRICT ~ Other ifusiness a~n~S--S-I!_S_Upplemental agenda ~~terns, if any -7- ~lb (38 ) IT EM S ON ( 38) SUPP LEMENTAL AGE~DA (39 ) DIS9?HIC'!PS 3 i. lJ 6eHsi 6:erat;ieH e f metieR af)f)PeviRS s w.s f)e Rse f1:1Ra uaFFB:Hto , if any . See sw.pplemontal a g enaa attaefiment DI STRICT 11 consideration of motion approving warrants. "III" ons or suppleme ntal a genda (40 ) DI STRI CT 1 1 Co nsi d e r ation o f motion to a d journ C): /1 C- ('(41',) DI STRI CT 3 ~ En g ineer 's status re p ort re Ma st er Pl a n facilit i es ::,;-~~ DI S TRI CT 3 Ne ·--TKl.R ..... Report of en gin e ers o n r equ ests o f the Ci ty o f Bu ena Park ....... (4 4 ) a n d t h e City o f Cyp r ess r e q u estin g modificat i on of District's Master P l an of Trunk Sew e r s DIS TRI CT 3 Co n s i de r ation of mo t i on aut hori zing the General Manager to r equ est a proposal f rom Bo y l e En gine erin g Co r por at i on for des i g n of the Westminster Re lief Inter ceptor, Reaches 25 t hro u gh 29 DISTRICT 3 l"TEMS O N ( 44) SU Pl'l.U.'>!:NTA L AGENDA N\ \5 Consideration of motion approving warrants. See page "II" ( 45) . DISTRTCT 3 (45) ITEMS O N SUPP LEMENTA L AGEN DA FILE ·-·-·-·-·-\ s Lem ~ .. k-::::::.. \{\'e A/C -.• TKLR - (46) Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items : Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Cross-Complaint for Declaratory Relief, Case No. 214450, Jonn Inks , et al. vs. State of California, et al., and McGuire Construction, Inc. vs. State of California, et al., relative to construction of the Bolsa Relief Trunk Sewer (Reach 10) and Bolsa Avenue Storm Drain, Contract No. 3-17-1; and refer to General Couns e l and liability insurance carrier for appropriate action DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~:31 -8- . ' II ~-.. BOARDS OF DHlECTORS I County Sanitation Districts . II Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS OCTOBER 16, 1974 -7:30 P.M. ALL DISTRICTS Area Code 7 14 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA (16) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant books for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing payment of claims listed on page ''I" (17-A) Consideration of request to substitute engine and blower assembly subcontractor re 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment .at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-16: (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file the follo wing: (a) Letter from Donovan Construction Company, Contractor for Job No. Pl-16, dated September 18, 1974, r e listed subcontractor, Delaval, Engine and Compressor Division. See page "IV" (b) Letter from Delaval, Engine and Compressor Division, dated September 26, 1974, acknowledging that they are unable to enter into a subcontract with Donovan Construction Company for supplying engine and blower assembly for said job. See page "V" (d) Staff Memorandum, dat~d October 15, 1974, recommending approva l of the request for delisting of Delaval as a subcontractor for said contract and assigning the responsibility to Donovan Construction Company . See page "VI" (2) Consideration of motion approving the request of Donovan Construction Company for substitution of another person(s) or firm(s), including Donovan Construction Company , for the engine and blower assembly work f o r 46 MGD .Activated Sludge Treatment at Reclamation Plant . No. 1, Job No. Pl-16, in accordance with Section 410].5 of the Government Code, with the un ders t anding that th ere i s no chan g e in the specifi- cation or contract requirements. ALL DI ST RI CTS (C o ntin ued) (17-B) Consideration of bids for Additional Pump i ng Fac i l i ties at Oc ean Outfall Pum p ing St a tion, J ob No. J-6-1: (1) (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff mem o randum, dated October 15, 1974, re evaluation o f said bid s. Se e page "VII" Con s id e r a ti on o f Re solution No . 7~-141, to receive and fil e bid tabul a t i o n, r ejec ting a ll bids f o r Addi tional Pumping Facilities at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station , Job No. J -6-1, and dire cting that said work be acc om- plished by force account , pursuant to Section 4755 of the Healt h and Saf e ty Co de; a n d authorizing the st a ff to negotiate for purchase of proprietary ~quipment . ("-Section 4755 ..... If a l l bids are rejected, the district bo a rd o n a resolution adopted by a four -fifths vote may declare that the work can be performed mo re econ omically b y day l abor, or the ma t erials or supplie s furni s hed at a lowe r price in the open market and may have the work do n e in a manner stated in the reso l u tion in order t o t a k e a d v a n tage of this lower cost" ..... ) See pages "VIII" and "IX" DI STRICT 2 (2 2) Consideration of motion app r oving warrants . See page "II" (23 ) Consideratio n of St andard Resolution No. 74-1 42-2,-approving p l ans and specificat i ons for Carbon Canyon -Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer, Reach 2, from Carbon Canyon Channel t o Kraemer Boulevard , Contract No. 2-1 7 -2; and authorizin g advertis i n g f or bid s on November 21, 1974 DISTRICT S 5 & 6 (25) Considerati on of mo tion approving suspense fund warrants . See page "II" DISTRICT 5 (26) Con s iderati on of motion approving warrants . See pag e "II" DISTRICT 7 (32) Con s idera t ion o f mo t ion ap p r o v~ng wa rrants . See page "III" DISTRI CT 11 (38) Con sidera t i on o f mo tion appr oving warrant s . See p a ge "I II" DISTRI CT 3 (44) Con s i deratio n o f mot i on a ppro ving warrants. Se e p age "II" (45) Conside r a tion o f mo tion to r e c e ive and file Summons and Cross -Co mp l a int fo r Decla ra tory Re lief, Ca s e No . 2144 50 , John Inks , et al . vs . Stat e of Cal iforni a , et al ., and McGuir e Co nst r u ction, Inc. v s . State of Califor n i a , e t a l ., rel a ti ve to const r uc t ion of th e Bol sa Re lief Tr unk Sewer (R ea c h 1 0) and Bo l sa Av enue Storm Dr ain , Con t ract No . 3-17-1 ; and refer to Ge ne r a l Couns e l and li ab il i t y ins u r anc e carri e r f or appropriate act i on · -2 - WARP\.4~ NT NO. 23962 239-53 23964 ?~":1bt:; sr~ ~./')8 23967 23958 23969 2397J 23971 23972 23973 23974 23975 23976 23977 23978 23979 23980 23981 23982 23983 23984. 23985 23986 23987 23988 23989 21990 -.,...(99.1 cj992 23993 23994 23995 23996 23997 23998 23999 2l.!OOO 24001 24002 2~00-3· 24~04 24005 24006 24007 24008 24009 24010 24011 24012 24013 24014 24015 ·;:)16 ~017 24018 2~019 24020 21-J ·021 24J22 2l1023 24024 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Abbey Rents, Equipment Rental $ Air California, Air Fare Air C~nditioning Supply Co., Freight All Bearing Service, Inc., C~uplin~s, Equipment Parts Allied Power Sweeping, Paving Maintenance A:rierican Compressor Co~pany, 8ompress,::ir Repair American Lock and Supply, Inc., Hardware Anaheim Sewer Construction, Lateral Repair City of Anaheim, Power Anaheim Truck and Transfer Co., Freight Analytical Measurements, Test Equipment The Anchor Packing Company, Gaskets Baker Equipment Rentals, Equipment Rental Bank of America, Bond and Coupon Collection Banning Battery Company, Batteries Barnes & Delaney, Coupling and Belting Beckn~ri Instru~ents, Inc., Test Equipment Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair Bender Machine, Inc., Pump Repair Bennett Pump Company, Pumps Bessen and Associates, Pump Parts M.0.11-14-73 & 6-12-74 Bishop Graphics, Drafting Supplies · Blower Paper Company, Paper Supplies Bomar Magneto Servic, Inc., Magneto Repair Bris~ol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams Broadlick Art Supply, Drafting Supplies Burners and Controls, Inc., Controls CS Company, Valyes and Freight . Cal's Cameras, Photo Supplies and Processing California Collator Sales, Binding Supplies John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Serv. -I.W. Ordinance Champion Trophies, Facilities Tour Supplies Chemtech Industries, Inc., Jan~torial Supplies Coast Insurance Agency, Liability Insurance Premium William N. Clarke, WPCF Conference Expense College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials Commercial & C.B. Communications, Comnmnication Equip. Compressor Service Co., Compressor Parts Connell Chevrolet, Truck Repair Consolidated Electric Distr., Electric Supplies Constructors Supply Company, Hardware and Tools Control Specialists, Inc., Compressor Parts Copeland Motors, Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts County of Orang~, Tax Roll Extract Piogram Crane Packing CJmpany, Seals Crest Leasing Corp., Vehicle Lease Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplies Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies Clarence S. Curnrnings, Employee Mileage Daniels Tire Service, Truck Tires DeGuelle & Sons Glass Company, Furniture Repair Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling Dow Chemical Company, Chemicals The Drawing ~oard, Inc., Office.Supplies Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies. Enchanter~ Inc., ocean Monitoring En·,.ineers · Sales~Service Co. . Inc., Pump Parts 0 . Enterprise Printing Co., Printing FMC Croporati0n. Shaker Parts Foss Company, Foam System Hilliam Fox, -E:~:ployce Mileage Fischer and Porter Co., Metering Supplies & Chlor. Parts I-1 AMOUNT 166.oo 52.50 24.61 220.99 37J.5J 140.00 296.95 145.C>O 89.84 ·97.74 41.82 26.08 95.0C> 188.65 345 .14 1,600.97 171.72 28.00 488.40 l; 302·.so 13,314.02 43.75 333.53 196.58 91.00 70.08 30.03 l", 757 .17 676.31 538.28 2,223.14 25.44 364.64 2,549.00 84.85 133.66 38.16 847.78 177.14 1,655.05 2,078.96 353.15 21.67 3B4.65 588.10 136.16 147.28 40.00 2,273.68 72.18 319. 46 40.36 240.00 1, 688. 4 3 22. L18 343 .06 3,000.00 122.96 110.29 211~. 74 48.76 36.90 6,272.01 iARRANT NO. 24025 24026 24027 24028 24029 24030 24031 24032 24033 24034 24035 24036 24037 24038 24039 24040 24041 24042 24043 24044 24045 24c:>46 24047 24048 24049 24050 24051 24052 24053 24054 24055 24056 24057 24058 24059 24060 24061 24062 24063 24064 24065 24066 24067 24068 24069 24070 24071 24072 24073 24074 24075 24076 24077 24078 24079 24080 24081 24082 24083 24084 24085 24086 24087 24088 IN FAVOR OF Foxboro ·company, Controls $ France Products, C0mpress~r Repair Freeway Machine and Welding, Machining City of Fullerton, Water Garden Grove Lumber & Cement, Building Materials General Electric, Electric Supplies General Telephone c.:impany of Calif. Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine, Contract 1-1-73 Gilsabind Comapny, Seal Coating Golden State Machinery Co., Inc., Equipment Parts Goldenwest Fertilizer Co., Grit Removal Graybar Electric Co., Inc., Electric Supplies Hardware Systems, La.b Supplies Harman Pump Co., Freight Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting & COD Expenses Harrington Industrial Plastics, Piping Supplies Haul Away Containers, Trash Disposal Hendricks GMC Trucks, Inc., Truck Parts Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease Hi-Fi Banner Co., Signs Hoffmann's Nason Paint Store, Truck Paint Honeywell, Inc., Metering Supplies Howard Supply Co., Pipe, Pipe Supplies & Valves City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Beach Equipment Rentals, Equipment Rental Hydro Clean, Inc., Hydro Blasting Inland Nut and Bolt Co., Hardware & Freight._ Irvine Ranch Water District, Water Keen-Kut Abrasive Company, Tools Keenan Pipe and Supply Co., Pipe Supplies King Bearing, Inc., Bearings & Seals Kirst Pump and Machine Works, Pump Kleen-Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware L & N Uniform, Uniform Service LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Hardware & Tools Lakewood Pipe Service, Inc., Pipe Supplies Larry's Building Materials, Inc., Building Materials Lavender Fastener Company, Hardware Judy Lee, Employee Mileage Lewco Electric Co., Equipment Parts R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., Paving Materials McCoy Ford Tractor, Tractor Parts John McCullough, Employee Mileage McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Bushings & Hardware Majestic Fasteners Co., Hardware Mar Vac Electronics, Tools Master Blueprint & Supply Co., Drafting Supplies Metal Finis:t..ers F·::mnda ti on, Technical Manual Milo Equipment Co., Towing Charges Moore Products Co., Controls _ Morgan Equip~ent Company, Equipment Parts .Morrison Corr:pany, Valve Jean Mosher, Employee Mileage Motorola, Inc., Cornmunica tion Supplies Nakase Brothers, Landscape Supplies National Chemsearch, Cleaners National· Lumber and Supply, Inc., Bldg. Mat'ls & Hardware Neptune Microfloc, Inc., JPL Test Material City :Jf !Je~·rport Beac:1, ~·Ia ter Newport Skyways, Charter Service Re: Ecological Survey C. Arthur Nisson, Gen'l. Counsel Retainer & Qtrly Fees Oakite Products, Inc., Cleaner Occidental C~llege, Ecology Trawl I-2 AMOUNT 1,057.45 L812.98 '242.74 5.41 315.62 642.2R 3,885.~ 9, 341. 57 8,797.50 59.23 3,426.00 204.71 189. 48 6.91 335.57 301.33 280.00 159.02 567.62 88.53 172.36 209.60 2,929.64 9.10 234.24 1,898.31 l,5e9.91 3.50 263.30 2,478.61 330.7~ 808. 7"-if . 659.4q 313.05 2,987.27 1,054.05 243.06 53.93 131.99 41. 70 36.04 68.90 263.26 26.10 285.34 569.73 42.40 239.37 5.25 66.oo 31.48 388.52 986.44 19.80 136. 4 3 1,657.54 830. 7~ 248.\9b 403.14 . 5.00 48.oo i,006.2s '123.60 400.00 WARRANT· NO. 24089 2lt090 24091 24092 24093 0 4094 '-"095 24096 24097 24098 24099 24100 24101 24102 24103 24104 24105 24106 24107 24108 24109 24110 24111 24112 24113 24114 24115 24116 24117 24118 '?4119 ~120 24121 24122 24123 24124 24125 24126 24127 24128 24129 24130 24131 24132 24133 24134 24135 24136 24137 2ll 138 24139 24140 24141 24142 24143 ~4144 ~4145. 24146 24147 24148 24149 24158 24151 24152 24153 IN FAVOR OF Orange County Stamp Co., Drafting Supplies Osterbauer Con:press:ir Service~ Tools Pacific Coast Glass Co., Vehicle Repair Pacific Telephone M. C. Patten and Co., Inc., Gauges Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Co., EDP Review M.O. 4-10-74· J. N. Pena Janitorial Ser.vice, Right-of-Way Maintenance Perkin Elmer, Lab Supplies Tom Pesich, Employee Mileage Poly Fabrics, Sheeting Postmaster, Postage Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal Bernard T. Redican, .Employee Mileage The Register, Employment Ad The Republic Supply Co., Valves Republic Engines, Equipment Parts Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Metal Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts Routh Transportation, Oil Removal Ruff's Saw Service, Equipment Repair SGA Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies San Bar Tropical Fish, Ecology Supplies Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Santa Ana Book Store, Inc., Drafting Supplies City of Santa Ana, Right-of-Way Maintenance Sargent Welch Scientific, Lab Supplies Scientific Products, Lab Supplies City of Seal Beach, Water Security Industrial Supply, Pipe Supplies The Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies John Sigler, Employee Mileage Fred Sinasek, .Employee Mileage Singer Business Machines, Maintenance Agreement Smart and Final Iris ·co., Bags So-Cal Sign Company, Signs South Orange Supply, Pipe Supplies Southern California Edison Co. Southern California Gas Co. Southern California Water Co. Southwest Flexible Co., Hose Sout~west Processors, Inc., Oil Removal Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp. Bottled Water Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Concrete Material, Concrete Standard Oil Co., of Calif., Gasoline, Oil & Diesel Fuel Starow Steel, Steel . Sterling Art & Engineering, Drafting Supplies Sunnen Products Co., Equipment Parts Sweetland Cmnpany, Pump Parts J. Wayne Sylvester, WPCF Conference Expense T.B.S. Contracting, Inc.J Paving Repair Taylor-Dunn, Equipment Parts Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage. Taylor Bus Service, Facilities Tour Transportation Tektonix, Inc., Equipment Repair John D. Thomas, WPCF Conference Expense C. o. Thompson Petroleum Co., Kerosene Three M B.P.S.I., Reproduction Repairs Tiernan's Office Equipment, Adder Repairs Tony's Lock & Safe Service, Tools u. s. Equipment Co., Inc., Compressor Parts Union Oil C~., of Calif., Gasoline United Auto Parts, Truck Parts United Parcel Service, Freight Out Utilities Supply Co., Tools I-3 AMOUNT 64.68 29.88 137.51 458.04 628.47 2,344.oo 25J.0J 70.06 9.9J 276.41 500.00 60.00 93.06 220.20 1,796.02 8.24 475.37 711.32 1,866.29 32.99 376.05 119.57 84.95 7.95 30.00 226.86 39.64 34.88 . 342.33 2,103.56 39.00 35.58 55.00 24.27 501.90 . 365.02 58,293.80 570.21 3.00 1,469.19 1, 124. 30 115.33 120.72 271.87 2,72J.89 305.15 8. 34 I 13 • 04 ·26 .80 95.42 3,862.57 117.37 85.35 210.00 72.12 121.77 227.18 52.12 17.50 28.02· 116.97 5,-. ~,. ( • \,.J\ .. ) 281. 78 45.92 579.38 fARRANT NO. --···--··-·- 24154 24155 24156 24157 24158 24159 24160 24161 24162 24163 24164 24165 24166 24167 24168 24169 24170 24171 24172 24173 24174 24175 24176 24177 24178 24179 24180 24181 24182 24183 24184 24185 24186 24187 24188 24189 2LJ190 21.J 191 24192 24193 24194 IN FAVOR OF ·Valvate Associates, Valves $ Van Waters and Rogers, Odor Control Chemicals Jann Waples R.S., Odor Consultant Water Pollution Control Federation, Workshop Registration M.O. 9-11-74 . ; AMOUNT 652.06 1,725.75 224.10 45.00· 36.87 750. ,". 51.~ Waukesha Engj_ne Servicenter, Inc., Enr;ine Parts White, Fine and Ambrogne, Professional Services Russell Wold, Employee Mileage World Travel Bureau, Inc., Air Fare, JPL Grant M.O. 6-12-74 & WPCF Conference M.O. 9-11-74 Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Services & Supplies George YardleF Associates, Filter Zodiac Paper, Reproduction Supplies TOTAL JOINT OPERATING CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services Cheesrnan's Bench Rack Co., Shop Equipment Leroy Crandall & Associates, Consultant Pl-16 Daily Pilot, Bid Notice A-072 & E-072 Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16 E.T.I. & Kordick, Contractor I-8-3 Electronic Business Machines, Calculator Ficker Architects, Architect Service J-13 Hemisphere Constructors, Contractor P2-21 Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Mgmt. Pl-16 H0ward Supply Co., Hose Hydro Products, Water Sampler LBWS, Inc., Cabinets & Generator McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Milling Machine Manning Enviromental Corp., Flowmeter Masterson Scaffold Co., Scaffold Rental M. O. 6-12-74 · Orange County Equipment Co., Tools Pacific Engineers, Contractor I-4-R Perkin Elmer Corp., Lab Equipment Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Equipment Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Equipment The Shirley Co., Consultant Services J-6-1 Southern Calif. Testing Labs, Soil Testing Pl-16 Stewart Warner Alemite Sales, Wheel Balancer Testing Engineers, Inc., Testing Pl-16 Utilities Supply Co., Tools Victor Comptometer Corp., Calculator Weldex Enterprises, Sphere Inspection M. O. 6-12-74 Richard Cra:ner, Inc., Paint Material .M. O. 6-12-74 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF I-4 604.58 46.74 1,198.41 47.53 143.85 $ 196,575.86 $ 10,878.21 289.36 2,000.00 20.35 684,588.78 12,900.00 296.70 12,311.50 5,128.38 11-739.0'"' -324. 7'-' 2., 095 .42 9J6.67 377.00 1,733.35 3,686.00 644.75 10,288.78 3,932.60 3,419.88 380.52 1,500.0J 324.oo 1,395.22 i,o44.oo 330.85 2,cq6.30 1,118.00 Q 6,.. 2,305. b $ 778' 116 .. J6 $ 974,691.92 ~ WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 24195 24196 24197 2.-.,-98 24199 24200 24201 ?111~02 a..-203 24204 24205 24206 24207· ...,,, 24208 24209 County of Orange, Compaction Test 2-14-2 $ Kasler Corporation & L.H. Woods & Sons, Contractor 2-14-2 Lowry a.nd Associates, Engineering Service 2-17, 42.58 476,658.75 Construction Survey 2-14-2 Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Testing 2-14-2 & 2-18 DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Beard Development Company, Refund Overpayment County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County Interdistrict Sewer Use ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 8,180.18 3,718.00 $ 488,599.51 $ $ 7,123.14 179.00 7:,302.14 Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engr. Serv. 3-20~2 & 3-20-3 Construction Survey 3-18 $ County of Orange; Compaction Test 3-18 16~637.50 354.45 87.70 2,756.00 479,173.00 The Register, Bid Notice 3-20-1 Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Testing 3-18 A.G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N.M. Saliba, Contractor 3-18 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Fred Gallegos; Refund Permit Overpayment Woodford & Bernard and Pacific Telephone~ Refund Permit Overpayment DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF City of Newport Beach, Connection Fee Administration DISTRICTS NOS 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS Hewes-Schock, Contractor 5-14-R4 II $ 499,008.65 250.00 1,710.00 $ 1,960.00 $ 508,270.79 $ 140.25 $ DISTRICT NO. 7 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 24210 Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engr. Serv. 7-6-6 & 7-6-7 DISTRICT NO. 11. · ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 24211 F. B. Cook Corporation, Contractor ll-10-2R III AMOUNT $ 11,510.10 $ 3,265.93 # ' WESTERN DIVISION-MAIN OFFICE 1234 EAST NORMANDY PLACE POST OFFICE BOX 10119 • SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92711 TELEPHONE (714) 543-0171 September 18, 1974 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Ray E. Lewis Chief Engineer CERTIFIED MAIL Reference: 46 MGD Activated Sludge Plant at Reclamation Plant No. 1 Job Pl-16 Fountain Valley, California Subject: Listed Subcontractor -Delaval Gentlemen: During the prebidding period for the project, this office was in contact with a sales representative of Delaval Turbine, Inc. regarding the project. In the course of discussions, Delaval stated they would only bid to Donovan Construction Company on the basis that they be named ("listed") if they were the successful bidder for their section of work. This listing procedure was a 1 so required by Addendum No. 2, _Page 2, Paragraph #9. In addition, the.description of on site field labor that is described in this specification section supports the requirement for 11 listing 11 as Addendum No. 2 required. Since Delaval's proposal was conditioned ·on their being listed (if successful), Donovan Construction Company accepted their bid with that understanding. At the time of bid, Donovan Construction Company named Delaval as the successful subcontract bidder. Subsequent to Donovan Construction Company being awarded the contract by the County Sanitation Districts, a subcontract was prepared and offered to Delaval. Hcwever, we have now been notified by Delaval that they cannot enter into a subcontract for this work since they do not have a California contractor's license. In addition, they now take the position that their bid was for the furnishing of equipment only. (If this were the case, there would not have been a requirement for "listing" Delaval at the time of bid.) Therefore, in accordance with the provisions of ~he California State Code, Section 4107.5 (Subparagraph l; "When the subcontractor listed in the bid after having had a reasonable opportunity to do so fails or refuses to execute a written contract, when such written contract, based upon the general terms, conditions, plans and specifications for the project involved or the terms of such subcontractor 1 s written bid, is presented to him by the prime contractor" and Subparagraph 6; -AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER - AGENDA ITEM #17-A(l)(a) IV-1 ALL DISTRICTS Mr. Ray E. Lewis -2-September 18, 1974 "When the listed subcontractor is not licensed pursuant to the Contractors License Law") and pertinent State Contractor's License Law Regulations, Donovan Construction Company hereby requests pennission for the substitution of another person(s) or firm(s), including Donovan Construction Company, for the listed work as specified in Specification Section 63-2 of the contract documents. Since time is of the essence and with the current uncertainty of manufacturing and delivery schedules for equipment, we respectfully request that the proceedings relating hereto be conducted as soon as possible. Very truly yours, DONOVAN CPNSTR. UC.T ION CO~PAN_; /~----·_..,, . ..-c-/ ·-~Cc // 4/ L ona 1 d • Kuehnert.. · · ' Administrative Assistant cc: Delaval -Oakland and Los Angeles Mr. John McCormick ~. , .. AGENDA ITEM #17-A(l)(a) IV-2 ALL DISTRICTS .. : '• ·." September 26, 1974 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P. O·. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California Attention: Mr. R. E. Lewis Subject: Gentlemen; Chief Engineer Donovan Construction Company Job #7401 46 MGD Activated Sludge Plant at Reclamation Plant #1 Fountain Valley, California Job #Pl-16 ENGINE ANO COMPRESSOR DIVISION 550 85TH AVENUE P.O. BOX 2161 OAKLAND. CA 94621 PHONE 415 638-0130 Donovan Construction Company wrote to you on September 18, 1974 requesting that you approve the subsitution of another-person (s) or finn (s) including Donovan Construction Company for the listed work as specified in Section 63-2 of your contract documents. We would like to confirm that we agree that we are unable to accept the sub contract agreement (#7401-57) as presented by Donovan Construc- tion Company because of its non confonnance with our proposal . . We submitted our quotation for the equipment described in Section 63-2 of your specifications, to nine different competing contractors. It was clearly our intent in this quotation to furnish equipment o·nly and to be designated as the "prime supplier". While we recognized that the contract Addendum #2 Page 2 indicated that the prime supplier may qualify as a sub contractor we did not feel that the scope of war~ proposed by our bid would qualify us as a sub contractor. We were most anxious to avoid the necessity of re-bidding the engine and blower equipment after the award of your contract, therefore, we specifically asked that we be named as the "prime supplier". Our ignorance regarding the lack of contractual allowance for the 11 listing 11 of a prime supplier not withstanding, we never requested that we be listed as a sub contractor, or that we would not bid unless we were so listed. Accordingly our pricing to each of the contractors was based on an "equipment only 11 purchase order. OELAVAL TURBINE INC. AGENDA ITEM #17-A(l)(b) V-1 ALL DISTRICTS Mr. R. E. Lewis County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California September 26, 1974 Page 2 We are not presently a licensed contractor in the state of California and we do not intend to pursue such a license since our business does not require such licensing. We made an effort to negotiate the basic differences (taxes and sub contractor responsibilities) between our bid intent and Donovan's interpretation, but have been unsuccessful. Our final offer agreed to allow Donovan to purchase the blower equipment direct (pending the counties approval) from Dresser Industries, Inc. This would provide for the elimination of our mark-up on that equipment and would reduce the total tax exposure on the job. This agreement coupled with an additional discount on the engine and accessories placed the job in a favorable position relative to our. original bid price. However, we were then made aware of the fact that further interpretation problems existed. We did not include any installation of the engine and blower in our bid (the only except- ion being 63-2 Page 63-4 -Installation of the motor and blower controls and instrumentation) however, Donovan interpreted the bid price to include all installation. This is totally outside the scope of work intented by our bid and we have been unable to reach a mutually acceptable agreement on these matters with Donovan. We feel that we have done all possible to reach an agreement and regret that we will be unable to participate in this contract. Hopefully, a satisfactory agreement can be made with an alternate supplier to enable you to satisfy your requirements. We greatly appreciate the .opportunity offered to us in this project and hope tnat our inability to reach an agreement with Donovan will not adversely affect the outcome of this project or our future relationship with your offices. Very truly yours, DELAVAL TURBINE, INC. Engine and Compressor Division ?1::.:::--- cc: Donovan Construction Company AGENDA ITEM #17-A(l)(b) V-2 ALL DISTRICTS H E H 0 R A N D U M October 15, 1974 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844' ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71.t) 54'0·2910 (71.t) 962·2"4 l l SUBJECT: Subcontractor Listing on Job No. Pl-16 -46 MGD Activated Sludge Plant Additions at Reclamation Plant No. 1 At the time Donovan Construction Company, the contractor for the $30 million, 46-MGD Activated Sludge Plant Addition at Reclamation Plant No. 1, submitted their proposal, they listed Delaval Turbine, Inc. as a subcontractor to perform the work as required for the engine and blower assembly for this contract. Delaval Turbine, Inc. has subsequently refused to enter into a subcontract with Donovan Construction Company inasmuch as they are desirous of being a prime supplier and not a sub- contractor .. In accordance with Section 4100·et seq of the Government Code, if the prime contractor does not list a subcontractor, it is presumed that he is capable of performing the work himself and also, if a listed subcontractor refuses to enter into a subcontract with the prime contractor, then the prime contr~ctor has the preogative of ~ssuming the work or making a substitution therefor. It ts recommended that the Board of Directors allow the delisting of Delaval Turbine, Inc. from this contract and that the responsib)lity at this time be assigned to Donovan Construction Company according to the requirements of the Government Code.· Please refer to the two attached letters from the affected parties. REL:hje AGENDA ITEM #17-A(l)(c) -VI-ALL DISTRICTS M E M 0 R A N 0 U M October 15, 1974 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer . COUNTY SANITATION DIS!RICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71.t) 540-2910 (71.t) 962-2411 SUBJECT: Additional Pumping Facilities for Ocean Outfall Booster Station at Plant No. 2 -Job No. J-6-1 Evaluation of Construction Bid Received on September 5, 1974 Bid·s were received on September 5th for the installation of two engine driven pumping facilities at the Districts' ocean outfall booster station at Plant No. 2. Only one bid was received, from Bovee & Crail Construction Company, in the total lump sum amount of $1,678,700. In September, 1972, the staff submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and the Environmental Protection Agency, Project Report No. 2 for the 1972-73 Joint Works Improvements and Additions. This Project Report included the installation of two gas driven pumps at the Foster Outfall Booster Station. The estimated cost as presented in the Report was $775,000. As of this date, the State has not elected to place this particular project on a fundable priority but because of the necessity of providing for these needed pumping facilities, the staff, with previous authorization from the Board, has proceeded with the preparation of the plans and specifications and solicitation of the bids for these pumping units. The staff had recommended a budge~ary amount of $900,000. for the 1974-75 fiscal year for these pumps and e~gines. At the time the engineer submitted the plans and specifications for this project, the Engineer's Estimate was $1,390,0,00. In light of the sole bid received for this project, the staff requested the assistance of The Shirley Company, a mechanical engineering construction company, to evaluate the bid submitted by Bovee & Crail. It is evident that the principal part of this contract is the ~quipment purchase which John Carollo Engineers had estimated at an amount of $616,000, wherein the bid from Bovee & Crail and the evaluation from The Shirley Company reveal an equipment purchase in excess of $1,000,000. IM this period of spiraling escalation, it is most difficult to anticipate equipment purchases at this time. Most equipment' manufacturers will quote to a contractor with a base price plus a 1-1/2 to 2 percent per month escalation clause, or quote on a lump sum which projects the escalation to the date of delivery and normally includes the monthly escalation as previously stated. The staff and consulting engineers have reviewed the scope of the project since the receipt of the bids and have determined that the plans and specifications cannot be revised and still meet the requirements necessary for this facility. It is doubtful that rejection of the single bid received by Bovee & Crail Construction Company and readvertisement will result in any savings. AGENDA ITEM #17-B(l) VII-1 ALL DISTRICTS Fred A. Harper October 15, 1974 · Page Two It is essential that the Districts proceed as rapidly as possible to complete this needed facility. The Board has two apparent alternatives for consideration: 1. Accept the bid as submitted by Bovee & Crail in the total amount of $1,678,700. 2. Reject the bid as received and allow the Districts' forces to proceed on a "force account" basis to perform the work. To proceed with the "force account'.' basis, the staff must have the authority to negotiate for the major items of equipment where competitive equipment is not available. In those areas where competition is available, the staff would proceed· with a competitive bid procedure. On a "force account" basis, it must be realized that the staff would have to assume the systems responsibility to insure that the components are compatible with the final design. This effort in itself is estimated to be one man-year of engineering time. After the procurement of all the necessary mechanical equipment, the Districts would then either solicit proposals for an installation contract or perform the work w·ith its own forces. It is my recommendation that the Board of Directors reject the bid of Bovee & Crail Construction Company and that the General Manager be given the authority to negotiate those essential equipment purchases necessary for this project and that other work as required be performed by either Districts• personnel or competitive bids·be received therefor. Please refer to the attached letters from The Shirley Company and John Carollo Engineers. REL: hje AGENDA ITEM #17-B(l) VII-2 ALL DISTRICTS J.OHN CAROLLO ' ' PHOENIX ARIZONA JOHN A. CAROLLO, P.E. < 1906-1971 > H. HARVEY HUNT, P.E. HOWARD M. WAY, P.E. ROBERT G. WILLIAMS, P.E. DONALD R. PREISLER, P.E. GAIL P. LYNCH, P.E. WALNUT CREEK CALIFORNIA Mr. Fred A. Harper, General .Manager ENGINEERS SANTA ANA CALIFORNIA WALNUT CREEK PLAZA, SUITE 750 1990 NORTH CALIFORNIA BLVD WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94596 AREA CODE: (415> 932·1710 Septanber 16, 1974 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 · Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Additional Pranpin3' Facilities at Ocean Outfall Pranping Station, Job No. J-6-1 We have reviewed the bid received on Septanber 5, 1974 for construction of the subject job. One bid was received in the airount of $1,678,700 fran Bovee & Crail Construction CCinpany, Param::>nt, cali- fornia. Their bid was presented in proper fonn with required bid bond. The engineers estimate for construction was $1,390,000. The above bid exceeds the engineers estimate by about 21 percent. We have obtained a breakdcMn of the contractor's bid and canpared it to the en- gineers estimate (see attached) ~ In general, all items ccmpared very closely except the furnishing and installation of the engine and pump- ing equipnent. There was a large discrepancy on this itan. The engineers estimate included $904,604, while the contractor used $1,211,400 for this item. The large difference is apparently at- tributable to escalation of equipnent prices fran current levels to anti- cipated pricing at time of delivery, (about one year after order) . Our estimate fran the suppliers for furnishinJ equipnent·at the time we pre- pared our estimate was about $500,000. We evaluated and presented to you various alternatives for re- design of the job us:Lm electric driven equipnent on Septenber 12, 1974, and it was mutually decide:l that the most econanical approach was to stay with the gas engines as designed. AGENDA ITEM #17-B(l) VII-3 ALL DISTRICTS ,,; ... •. Mr. Fred A. Harper Septanber 16, 1974 Page 2 Your suggestion that the Districts purchase the equipnent . directly arrl have it installed would be a satisfactory methcrl ot pro- ceedin:J wi~ the work. We feel that the project is needed am recannerrl that Dis- tricts proceed with the work as soon as possible in the methcxl which is deaned by yoo to be rrost econanical. JOHN CAROLID EN:;INEERS WH:j AGENDA ITEM #17-B(l) VII-4 ALL DISTRICTS • .. . CDUNIY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE OOUNI'Y OONI'RACT CX\ST cnMPARISON JOB NO. J-6-1 Q)NI'RACI'OR JCE BRFAKrG\7N ESTIMATE General Civil W:>rk $ 67,800 $ 48,719 Pipirxj 255,000 235,100 *Equipnent Purchase 1,090,400 616,367 *Equipnent Installation 100,000 288,237 Misc. Mechanical 22,000 55,808 Misc. Steel & Al.um. 28,000 33,786 Electrical 75,000 100,000 Pain~ 9,500 11,983 Pond 10,000 included arove *Spare Parts 21,000 included above $1,678,700 $1,390,000 * Major difference is in equipnent purchase price. Totals for purchase an::1 installation of pump arrl engine package is as follows: $1,211,400 $ 904,604 AGENDA ITEM #17-B(l) VII-5 ALL DISTRICTS -' 4.. THE SHIRLEY COMPANY CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Ray Lewis Chief Engineer October 3, 1974 Subject: Additional Pumping Facilities for Ocean Outfall Booster Station Job No. J-6-1 Evaluation of Construction Bids .Gentlemen: In response to your letter of September 26, 1974, enclosed please find our evaluation of·' the subject project. We have included all of original work sheets plus any written quo- tations which we have been able to obtain from major suppli- ers and or subcontractors. A comparison of our estimate to that of the low (sole) bid- der and John Carollo Engineers is as followes: ITEM BOVEE CRAIL JCE TSC General Civil Work 67,800 48,719 31,880 Piping 255,000 235,100 229,430 Equipment Purchase 1,090,400 616,367 1,136,870 Equipment Installation 100,000 288,237 62,530 Misc. Mechanical 22,000 55,808 42,880 Misc. Steel and Alum. 28,000 33,786 50,700 Electrical 75,000 100,000 55,600 Painting 9,500 11,983 9,970 Bond 10,000 in above in above Spare Parts 21,000 in above 22,870 Total 1,678,100 1,390,000 1,642,730 Z32•1 VENTURA BOULEVARD / SUITE 310 / WOODLAND HILLS / CALIFORNIA / 91384 / TELEPHONE {213) 884·7220 AGENDA ITEM #17-B(l) VII-6 ALL DISTRICTS • .• r Page 2 October 3, 1974 We would point out the following items which should be taken into effect in your evaluation and your intrepation of our estimate: 1).It is a physical impossibility that this project could be completed within the 420 calender days allocated by the spec-. ifications. This fact is based on White Superiors quoted shippment date of 56 ·weeks after receipt of order and time for Engineers approval. We believe the earliest completion date that could be anticipated to be 510 calender days. This could force bidders to include 18,000.00 liquidating damages intheir bid. We have included an allowance of 18,000.00 under our c9ntingency and profit item. 2).0ur piping prices could be somewhat high as we used the current TRADE BOOK·prices less 10%. Discounts normally range between 20% and 50% depending on the material involved how- ever we feel a conservative view should be taken due to the fact that we have been experiencing widely fluctuating prices and find that a discount quoted today is of no value tomorrow. 3).Due to the limited time we have spent on evaluation we. have estimated the cost of may of the smaller items and feel we could be somewhat high or· low in certain areas. 4).The quotation received on the· standby emergency generator set was firm if an order was placed prior to October 26, 1974. After this escalation at a rate 1% per month would apply. , . 5).There is some confusion in the list of equipment and materials supplied by the engine manufacture White Superior. After ~everal conversations with their local representative the confusion still remains. As a result we may have dup- licated some costs. 6).The area in which the largest savings to the districts could be realized, we believe, is that of equipment purcha- sing. The districts could purchase the equipment direct from the manufacture at their base (todays) price with an understanding that final determination of price would be made at the time of shippment. White Superior's base bid which included most of the major prices of equipment was $712,000 with a bid price to the contractors o~ $987,000. This escalation of 275,000.00 representates 38% of the base bid or 2.375% per month using their 16 month shippment period. AGENDA ITEM 17-B(l) VII-7 ALL DISTRICTS .~ Page 3 October 3, 1974 It is not only our opinion but several other manufactures that a 1% per month. _escalation should be adequate. 1% per month of White Superiors base bid escalated for 16 ~onths amounts to $114,000.00 or a savings to the districts of $161,000.00. 7).0bviously the districts understood their needs and based on this 1 certain equipment was spelled out in the specifica- tions. The result however was to limit competition to only one manf acturer thus reducing the chance for a truly compet- itive bid on thier part. CONCLUSION It is our opinion that the bid received on September 5, 1974 from Bovee-Crail for the subject project were as competive as could be expected. While it is true that if we were to have competed against Bovee-Crail at the bid opening we may have been the low bidder there would hot have been a marked difference. Based on all of the above it is our opinion that the lowest possibl~ cost the Districts could anticipate spending through a complete rework of this project is as followes: THE SHIRLEY COMPANY ESTIMATE LESS: Liquidated Damages Pre purchase by the Districts of major equipment. Price in effect at time of shippment TOTAL $1,642,730.00 (18,000.00) '(161,000.00) $1,463,730.00 We sincerly trust you will be able to understand our standard work sheets and method of pricing. Should you have any additional questions please do no~ hesitate to contact us. we wish to thank you for considering our company to make this evaluation and hope you will include oµr firm name on your bid list for future work. V~ry truly yours .. E SJII~~J SoMP~Y ~ }_~ f~:i\~h'r/{,/,(./( "if 11/ mn .I:'. S irley '1ii President AGENDA ITEM #17-B(l) VII-8 ALL DISTRICTS RESOLUTION NO. 74-141 .REJECTING ALL BIDS FOR ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUr.IPING STATION, JOB NO. J-6-1, AND DIRECTING COMPLETION OF WORK BY l:t,ORCE ACCOUNT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, REJECTING ALL BIDS FOR ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION, JOB NO. J-6-1, AND DIRECTING THE WORK BE COMPLETED BY FORCE ACCOUNT * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, do hereby determine that: WHEREAS, the Districts have published Notice Inviting B.ids for Additional Pumping Facilities at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-1, in accordance with the provisions _of Section 4755 of the State Health and Safety Code, and on September 5, 1974, publicly opened and· read all bids submitted; and, WHEREAS, the sole bid received has been evaluated by the Districts' engineers and staff, and the .apparent low bid exceeds the engineers' estimate by approximately twenty-one percent (21%); and, WHEREAS, the Chief Engineer has this day submitted a written recommendation that all bids be rejected and work be completed under the Districts' force account, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: Section 1. That the bid tabulation and recommendation of the Chief Engineer be received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That all biµs received for said work be hereby rejected and that all bid bonds be .returned to the bidders; and, Section 3. That the Boards of Directors do hereby declare that said work can pe performed more economically by utilization of day labor, or the materials or supplies furnished at a lower price in the open market; and, Section 4. That the Districts' staff is hereby directed to proceed with and complete Additional Pumping Facilities at Ocean AGENDA ITEM #17-B(2) VIII-1 ALL DISTRICTS Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-1, by force account; and, Section 5. That the Districts' staff be authorized to negotiate for purchase of proprietary equipment for said job, all other materials to be acquired in accordance with the established ~ purchasing procedures. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held October 16, 1974~ AGENDA ITEM #17-B(2) VIII-2 ALL DISTRICTS Engineer's Estimate $1,390,000 BID T A B U L A T I 0 N SHEET Date September 5, 1974 -11 :00 A.M. Contract For: Additional Pumping Facilities at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station -Contract No. J-6-1 CONTRACTOR l. Bovee & Crail Construction Company 15200 Downey Avenue Paramount, California 90723 2·. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. AGENDA ITEM #17-b(2) IX TOTAL BID $1,678,700,00 ALL DISTRICTS ---·-·' RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING· DOCUMENTS . October 16, 1974 -·7:30 p.m. GOLDEN WEST FERTILIZER COMPANY 80 I I Irvine Boulevard Santa Ana, Calif. 92705 Phone (714) 832-1860 Septe~ber 10, 1974 Mr. Fred Harper Orange County Sanitation District Fountain Valley, California .·PROPOSED RECLAEATIOlT BY GOLDE~J WEST FE~TILIZSB co~~ANY OF •. CE!JTRI?UGED S=:WAGE SLUDGE WITH NO HORE THAN EIGHTY FEBCE:~T ( 80%) . . MQISTtTRE CONTENT Dear Fred: Golden West Fertilizer Company would like to amend their current contract concerning the reclamation of sewage from plants #1 and #2 in the following ways. Due to expansi?n of the total.operat~?n,Ait will. be ne?essary to extend the contract for a period of __ ,, years beyond its present duration. This extensio~ is due to costs incurred vs profits obtained from.this operation in order for. it to be economically justified. Golden West Fertilizer· Company has ew.barked on construction of a sludge drying machine which, if it operates to engineering specifications, can revolutionize the sludge reclamation industry. This project will cost Go~den West Fertilizer Company a minimum of $70,000.0~ over the next 6 months. . · . . Due to the increase in the number of cubic yards.of sewage sludge that Golden West Fertilizer Comp3...'Yl.Y will be required to ~reat, Golden West Fertilizer Company needs the following conditions met. Material being taken from pl2..nt #1 will be transported from the premises to Golden West Fertilizer Company facilities at Irvine at a cost to the county of ;;;2.00 per cubic yard. Materials at plnnt //2 will be handled in the following manner. Orange Cotmty Salli t;J.tion District will grade and pack an area of approxirr.ately 5.3 ~cres adjacent to the current centrifuge site. Odor control spray lines will be installed by Orange Cou.""1.ty Sanitation District around the perimeter of the 5.3 acreso Cr~ge Cou."lty Sanitation District will provide needed methane sludge gas for the heating of the experinental drying m9chine. Only th~ m~tha..'Yl~ gas now being flared will be necessc::ry for this experin:en ting. (continued) AGENDA ITEM #9(a) A-1 ALL DISTRICTS I· , Mr. Fred Harper Ora~~e County Sanitation District Septenber 10, 1974 -paee 2 The material which Golden West Fertilizer Co~pany will be· receiving at plant #2 must not exceed eighty percent {80;;) in moisture content, nor shall it be found to be unsuitable as a plant-growing medium. If either of these problems occurs, Golden West Fertilizer Company is not required to accept said material. Orange County Sanitation District will also pay Golden West Fertilizer Co~pany at a rate of Jl.00 per cubic yard of centrifuged sludge with a minir.iuo daily guarantee of ~~80. 00 :if tl:ler• is l1t1•6 tho:n-lBO oubio yar d!5 of ~h~~o-pr~'OR= aiXly gj ven-tt~y. Golden West Fertilizer Co~p~~y aclrnowledges that there will be an approximate minimum of 200 cubic yards per day of centrifuged sludge produced and a maximum of 300 cubic yards per day, and that thi's will continue on a seven-day-per-week basis. excluding six holidays per year. Golden West Fertilizer Company will use one Caterpillar loader with a four cubic yard loading bucket. Also to·be installed by Golden west Fertilizer Company will be a screening operation for loading of material into bulk trucks and also for bagging purposes. The screening operation will take up an area of approxirr.ately 20 1 . X 60 1 • A packaging facility will also be installed approximately in January, 1975 and will also be housed in an area.approximately 20 1 X 60 1 • There will be a foreman on the facility during all working hours, along with approximately 2 -7 employees, the latter being for a bagging .crew while bagging is done. T~e sewage sludge will be delivered to the five-acre processing site by Orange County Sanitation District and placed on an area over ·Nhich. coarse shavings will have been spread so that no seepage from the sludge will go into the soil. Golden West Fertilizer Company will then mix the sludge with the shavings at a rate of approximately 1-1 for both materials and will stockpile it normally within a short time to insure minimal odor nroblems. These comuost piles will ·be turned on an average of once a week until the material is dried and composted enough to meet all current laws concernine; the handling of such materials. It will then be removed ·from the processing facility by either Golden West Fertilizer Company transport units or by other wholesale establishments. Sincerely, 1 /) t --(J {'t»(11. Gordon P. Cooper Operations Manager Golden West Fertilizer Company AGENDA ITEM #9(a) A-2 ALL DISTRICTS RESOLUTION NO. 74-127 DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO APPROVE CHANGE ORDERS TO GENERAL MANAGER A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO THE GENERAL MANAGER TO APPROVE CERTAIN CHANGE ORDERS IN CONTRACTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SEWERAGE FACILITIES FOR THE DISTRICT(S) NOT TO EXCEED $25,000 * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the General Manager be and he is hereby authorized to approve, execute, and deliver change orders for unforeseen or unanticipated conditions in connection with contracts for the construction of sewerage facilities for a District or Districts, _providing that no one change. order shall increase the ~ contract price more than $25,000.00; and, " Section 2. That this authority shall apply to all existing contracts for the construction of sewerage facilities and all such contracts entered into in the future until this resolution is amended or repealed; and, Section 3. That nothing contained in this resolution shall be construed to authorize the General Ma·nager to execute a final closeout agreement with the contractor in any such contract or to finally accept the work constructed under such a contract. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held October 16, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #9(c) -B-ALL DISTRICTS . -- cou:ay ~~ . .\:~n-,·.1: ~·:. n1~;Ti:1l:T~.~ ()J .. \>!';\::~;1. cou::TY l'. o. }:ox Sl27 -l0~:.1.i Elli!; ~\\"("llllC Fount~in Vall.cy, Californja ~}270B CllA~~GE Ol~DER c. o. ;\o. J~<TRACTOit: Hemisphere Constructors DATE __ O__.c.__t_o_b_e_r_9_ 1 _l ~--· J!3: Digestcrs "N" & "0" at Plant No. 2, Job No. PZ-21 Amount of this Ch:ingc Order (<Jx:c!) (NX}JNX::q $ 0. 00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the'-"' bntract antl/or contract ,,·ork arc hereby nuthorizc,l an<l as co1:ipcnsation hcrcfor, t:1c following additions to or dc<luctions from the.: contract price arc ercbr approved. • .. Extension of Contract Time The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of time for delayed delivery of equipment TOTAL TIME EXTENSION · Summary of Contract Time Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original· Completion Date Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date ----- .· 61 Calendar Davs 61 Calendar Davs January 25, 1S73"-' 300 Calendar Days Noyernber 21, 1973 313 Calsndar Days 613 Calendar Days September 30, 1974 Original Contr~ct Price $ 1 ' 0 6 8 ' 4 1 ~·. 0 0 -- $ _~_.!_~ 61. 98 Prev. Auth. Changes This Ch~nge t\'~XX) U'{~mX~l{) $ ______ 0_._00~-- A~cn<lcd Co~tr~ct Price s 1 ' 0 7 7 ' 3 7 4 • 9'8 BNll'<l authorization <l{!te: CX:tobcr 16, 1974 .Approved: cnu;,;TY S.'\;\IT;\'f IO~J nr ~.>TRI CT:-~ \.°'·r 0 r 0.. n z e County , Cl, 1 if or n i :~ By -rc·r,...----~-,·---,--.. \..,, l J. '. ~· l J. l I:·:: ; , · AGENDA T._TE_M_#_lQ_(_a) -C-ALL DISTRICTS RESOLUTION NO. 74-128 , ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-21 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-21 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and.11,of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contrac·tor, Hemisphere Constructors, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for DIGESTERS "N" & "O" AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-21, on the 25th of September, 1974; and, Section 2. That by letter, John Carollo Engineers, Districts' engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as. having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the Districts has con- curred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That Digesters "N" & "O" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-21, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 25th of January, 1973; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Hemisphere ·Constructors, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Digesters "N" & "O" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-21, is hereby approved; and, Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held October 16, 1974. AGENDA ITEM # 10 (b) -D-ALL DISTRICTS BID T A B U L A T I 0 N SHEET October 1, 1974 Date=--~----------------~ 11:00 a.m. Contract For: BIDDER THREE (3) 4-WHEEL ELECTRIC CARS SPECIFICATION NO. A-072 ·l. Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company 2114 W. Ball Road Anaheim, ·CA 92804 2. Dutch Stark Company 18217 Arminta Street Reseda, CA 91335 3. Westinghouse.Electric Corporation i6701 Redlands Blvd. Redlands, CA 92373 TOTAL BID $5,855.17 No "Bid No Bid It is recommended that award be made to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company in the amount of $5,855.17. AGENDA ITEM #lO(c) W. N. Clarke Superintendent -E-ALL DISTRICTS RESOLUTION NO. 74-129 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 71-3 3 AS AMENDED (POSITIONS AND SALARIES) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF. DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING POSITIONS AND SALARIES RESOLUTION NO. 71-3, AS AMENDED * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Resolution No. 71-3, as amended, is ~ereby further amended by the addition of Exhibit "A" dated October, 1974; and, Section 2. That Exhibit "A" dated September, 1974, is hereby rescinded; and, Section 3. That any other resolutions or motions or portions thereof that conflict herewith are hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and, Section 4. That this resolution shall become effective October 1, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #lO(d) F-1 ALL DISTRICTS ~ I f\) :r::-- t-t t-t t:1 H (/) 1-3 :::0 I~ I EXECUTIVE COHHITTEE I I DIR OF FINANCE ' SEC TO BOARDS 32 I (28) AUMIH' FINAlil.E. Ull"I - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY .SUHHARY · ORCAlll ZAT I 0.'IAL CHART OCTOBER, 197lt BOARDS or . .. DIRECTORS 259 {217) GENERAL MNAGER 191 _(ll::>OJ . ~!,~. QPEB ~ LABORATORY DEPT~ 18 I ttfi> ' I llD I. ~ •r.,ADl'U TATS _.._ ____..__ _,_____, SENIOR SENIOR PROC & , ACCOUNTANT ACCOUNTANT PROP CHIEF SR FACL SUPV · OPER ENG I NEER .r.2 (33) 23 (21) 41 (32) COLL HECH FACL FAC I LIT! ES FACILITIES SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR I I roqc.E STRUC-DIGES-GROUNDS SEWERS PUHP. ACCT TURES TERS $TAT!ON SHOP & FIXED HOB I LE EQUIP EQUIP ( FACILITIES SUPERVISOR INSTRU- HENTS ELECT CHl·Ef OPERATOR TRHT PLANT OP En .( I BACT LAB . LABORATORY SUPERVISOR I I CHEM INDUST WASTE LAB LAB I CHIEF ENC I NEER I MARINE SPECIAL C011111TTE£S IN CH I EF OF INOUST ' PERHIT ECOLOCY PE RH IT ' CONN - EXHIBIT "A" I CEN'L COUNSEL H I (28) ~-~~RING DEPT SENIOR ENGINEER PLANT CONSTR MPS' RAFTING ( SENIOR ENG I NEER DIST CONS TR I RES0t;i((£~ w.1,A(.~~l Iii [NC 114Ll R l'ES '1Cl1T ([NJ[lt . '-""" PROGRESS REPORT TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS COUNTY SANITATION D1~Tl\ICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALI! u1m1A P.O. BOX 812;" 10844 ELLIS AVrNI r FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFOM.NtA 92/0d (7141 540-291 a (714) 962-2<411 I-8-3 -INFLUENT METERING AND DIVERSION STRUCTURE -($1,503,679) INFLUENT CHANNEL: Complete to existing Plant No. 1 influent. INFLUENT PIPI!\G: Euclid, Sunflower,, and Newhope-Placentia Trunks flowing through Diversion Structure and down to Plant No. 2. METERING AND DIVERSIO~ STRUCTURE: Complete. Contract approximately 97 percent complete to date. P2-20 -POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT P-LANT NO. 2 -($158,294) No work completed this month. Contract approximately 58 percent complete to date. P2-21 -DIGESTERS "N" AND "0" AT PLANT NO. 2·-($1,076,514) DIGESTERS "N" AND "0": Complete. DIGESTER CO~TROL BUILDING: Complete. TUNNELS: Complete. DI GE STER GAS C0~1PRESSORS: Complete . . . ·. STOR\f \\'ATER Pt.NP STATION: Complete. Contract 100 percent complete. Pl-16 -46 ~!GD ACTI\':\TFD srr;~r,~ P! .. \~;~ .-\T RECL\~·~:\TIO~: PUST ~o. 1 -($29,876,000) Work on this project continues as planned. The 18 " VCP plant drain line has been completed. Contractor is presently working on the 42" RCP bypass line. Concrete ~ork has begun on the aeration basin, the blo~er and power buildings concurrently. Pile driving continues and is approxim~tely thirty percent complete. .. AGENDA ITEM #lO(e) G-1 ALL DISTRICTS • .. Progress Report Treatment Plant Projects Page Two TREAntEXT PLA~T \\'ORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total ~ork During September Total Work Awaiting Award DISTRICT TRUNK LI~'E \\'ORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During September Total \\'ork ·Under Design Total Work Awaiting Award $32,714,307 4,663,553 778,681 1,678,700 $10,880,193 6,098,608 848 ,450 17,442,695 4,602,992 TOTAL AMOUNT UNDER CONTRL\CT, DESIGN A."JD AWAITING AWARD October 10, 1974 .... AGENDA ITEM #lO(e) G-2 CouNTY SANITATioN D;srR1crs of ORANGE COUNTY. C,;u;:c2ri1A P.O. BOX 8127 IOB-44' ELLIS AVEr·-.uE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9270:1 (71-6) S..0-2910 ~ (71-6) 962-24 I I $32,714,307 1,678,700 $10,880,193 17,442,695 4,602,992 .. $67,318,887 ALL DISTRICTS : homn Frssociotes 121 GaJ/ WaJ~1°nglon Avenue, San/a Ana, Caf,/ornia 92701 (714} 541-5301 October 10, 1974 Board of Directors County Sanitation.District No. 2 of Orange County, California P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer Dear Mr. Lewis: In accordance with your request, we are pleased to submit this proposal for providing engineering services for the final plan~ and specifications for the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Grove Street to the Orange County Line (2-14-3). This reach will complete the project as originally out- lined in our studies initiated in 1969, subsequent Master Plan study of 1971, and project reports and environmental impact reports prepared for the various reaches of the project. On October 31, 1973, the Board authorized us to conduct preliminary en- gineering and alignment studies for this project. The results of that were used in the preparation of a project report and an environmental impact report for possible Federal and State grant funding for the Upper Basin capacity in this project. Also included in that authorization was the detailed mapping of the recommended route of the project. This work is now well under way. In order to meet the critical timing needs for this project, it is now proposed to commence the preparation of the final plans and specifications. Three ·possible contract reaches are proposed at this time. The first con- tract would extend from Grove Street to Imperial Highway. This reach is urgently needed by the District to provide relief capacity to the,District's existing trunk sewer system. The upper two contract reaches are needed to meet future capacity commitments for the District and capacity for' the Upper Basin. It is understood that the final sizing of the project will depend on the future input from the cities within the tributary area and the final de- cisions by the Board. Also, the timing of the contract reaches will be dependent on grant considerations and the relationship with the Upper Basin Agency. It is proposed to work closely with the District staff in regard tu the timing and sequence of events in carrying out the proposed design work. AGENDA ITEM #lO(f) 10963 SAN DIEGO MISSION ROAD. SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92108 (714) 281-5567 H-1 DISTRICT 2 Mr. Ray E. Lewis October 10, 1974 Page 2 The project will include a river crossing at Imperial Highway to tie into the the existing south Santa Ana River trunk, and also a metering and quality monitoring station at the County line. Costs are to be shared with the Upper Basin in proportion to project capacity. . . We will perform the following professional engineering services for the project in accordance with the following: 1) Hold conferences with District staf~, other interested agencies, and private property owners who may be involved in the projects. 2) Make arrangements for and coordination of field surveys, soils investigations, and related work. 3) Assist in obtaining permits from the affected governmental agencies. 4) Prepare construction plans and specifications. 5) Prepare estimates of quantities and cost estimates. 6) Deliver the original plans and specifications to the District for reproduction by the District. 7) Prepare legal descriptions and maps for right of way acquisition as required. 8) Work with appraiser and attorney in right of way matters. ~) Assist the District in securing and tabulating bids, analyzing bid results, and awarding contracts. 10) Check shop and working drawings as may be submitted by the Oontractors. 11) Furnish consultation and advice to the District during construction. 12) Make final inspections and prepare reports of the completed projects. 13) Prepare as-built drawings of the completed work and file the origi- nal drawings with the District. AGENDA ITEM #lO(f) H-2 DISTRICT 2 Mr. Ray E. Lewis October 10, 1974 Page 3 The estimated costs of the contract and the proposed design fees are shown below. In our proposal for the preliminary engineering phase, it was noted that the cost of our preliminary engineering work, not including aerial mapping and surveying, would be deducted from the final design fees. The appropriate deductions for this work already accomplished and the net fee for each contr~ct are also shown. Estimated Design Net San Dist.#2 Upper Basin Contract Project Cost Fee Deductible Fee Share Share Grove St. to Imperial Fwy(Reaches 2,3,4) Imperial Fwy to Bry- ant Ranch (Reach 5) Bryant Ranch to County Line (Reaches 6,7,8) TOTALS $3,808,000 4,551,000 2,288,000 $10,647,000 $151,200 $5,100" $146,100 $31,800 $114,300 180,700 6,100 174,600 10,900 163,700 90,800 3,000 87,800--0 87,800 $422,700 $14,200 $408,500 $42,700 $365,800 Field surveys will be required for construction staking. In addition, soils investigations will be needed along the route of the project. We propose that all field surveys be performed on a per diem basis at the following hourly rates: 2-man survey party $41. 25/hr 3-man survey party $60.00/hr Survey Supervisor $20.75/hr These rates are subject to revision after August 1, 1975, under the terms and conditions of the operating engineer's surveyors contract. Soil inves- tigation costs will be billed at our actual cost upon prior approval by District staff. Payment is to be monthly as invoiced. AGENDA ITEM #lO(f) H-3 DISTRICT 2 I I I !· Mr. Ray E. Lewis October 10, 1974 Page 4 We propose that all other outside services required and approved by the District, such as plant inspection for quality control of materials used on project construction, will be paid directly by the District upon pre- sentation of a statement of such outside services with the Engineer's certification. It is proposed that payment of design fees be monthly on a percentage- completed basis up to 95% at time of delivery of plans and specifications, and 100% payment when the work is completed and accepted by the District. After authorization to proceed is given," the work can be accomplished in accordance with the construction schedule as outlined in the project re- port and as previously discussed with the Board. Very truly yours, Lowry and Associates Donald·J. Martinson DJM:skc AGENDA ITEM #lO(f) H-4 DISTRICT 2 cuu;,ry :.;:\~HT,\THl:: J)J:~ri:H:r:. ll!: d;.,\·:~;i cD:;:;ri' P • 0 • Box 3 1 2 7 -· 1 o ., . i ·: E 11 j !; . \ v r: 11 u c Fount 3 i 11 V ~i. ll c )' ; Ci 1 i r" r 11 i a ~J 2 7 0 8 CJLl\~:GE OIU>i:l{ . . .. ·. .) Kas ler Corporation &· L. fl. Woods .(h rr .. AC1 Q;,: -.L~Q.~Inc. I /\ Joint Venture C. 0. !\O. 3 ~---~~~~~~~~ DATE October 3, 197.t OB:· Santa An:i R i vc·r Interceptor Sewer from Kate Ila AvC'nuc to La Palm:t Avenue, Contract No. 2-l·l -~ Arilount of thi5 Change Order (ADD) (Nl."Oll~~ s 4,488.75 ...._,. In accordance with contract provisions, the following chang.cs in the bn tract and/ or contract Hork a re here i>y ·au th or i z c<l an<l as coupensa t ion here for, t:-1c following a<l<li tions to or c.1cJuctioHs from the.; co11tract price arc ;ere by approvcJ. Reference~ Contractor's letter to District dated September 6, 1974 and District's letter to contractor dated September 10, 1974 ADD: For additional work involved to support the 16" high pressure .oil line between Stations 497+30 and .503+30 shown at elevation 168: and found to be at elevation 174: and 2 feet closer to the center line of the sewer than shown on the plans and therefore projecting· into the trench prism. ·~- Extension of Contract Time ~The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of time due to the above work TOTAL ADD ·TOTAL TIME EXTENSION Summary of Contract Time Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension This Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date .· Original Contract Price Prcv. Au th. Changes $4,488.75 $4 ,488 .. 75 4 Calendar Days 4 Calendar Days ·November 29, 1973 380 Calendar Days December 14, 1974 4 Calendar Days · 35 Calendar Days 415 Calendar Days January 18, 1975 $ 3,545,635.33 $ o.oo This Chanr,c (ADD) (~l~~X~1~ $ 4,488.75 ---,--·-- J\r.1Cnd eel Hoare!. authorization date: October 16, 1974 liy ----- AGENDA ITEM #lO(g) -I- Contract Price s 3,SS0,124.08 ··-----------. ---------------·-·-- Approvell: COU:\'l Y S:H~ITATio;.: DISTRICTS of Orange Cou~1ty, California By DISTRICT 2 cou;;ry S:\:HT,\T Io:~ -J>I STi: J CTS OF O!' . .,\::GE cou::TY P. o. Box· 8127 -lOo-14 Elli:; .;\v~nue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHA~GE Olll>ER Kasler Cor~orition 6 L~ H. Woods J: \Tr ..A CT 0 rt : _.i.&'--11.js~o..un~s ... _T,uD.i.C-..,._,Q,A_.io.&.110....,jun..a.t----.V.e.u.D.1.1!11.1...lTuP..__ ______ _ C.O. NO. 4 DATE ---O-c~t-o_b_e_r~3--1_9_7_4 ___ __ JB: Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer from Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-2 ·Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (~K~t). $ 20,500.00 . In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the.._.,, ontract anc.l/or contract work arc hereby n.uthorizcc.l and as cor.tpensation hcrcfor, t~e following additions to or deductions from t11c contract price are ercby approved. ADD: For an additional 50 ft.± of 32" minimum diameter jacked casing pipe for the 18" VCP sewer at Station 643+31.. Work necessary due to additional fill placed in the area by the Flood Control District after award of contract. Work to be accomplished for the lump sum price of $7,500.00 For additionaJ rip-rap and grouting of this rip-rap from Station 643+30± to Station 643+60 and from Station 647+60 to Station 648+00. Work necessary due to additional rip-rap placed in this area for grouting of thi~ rip-rap by the Flood Control District after award of contract. Work to be accomplished for th~ lump sum price of $13,000.00 Extension of Contract ·Time Add TOTAL .ADD. $ 7,500.00 i3,000.00 $20 ,soo. oc~ The Contractor is hereby gTanted an extension of time due to the above work 10 Calendar Days .Summary of Contract Time Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension This Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date TOTAL TIME EXTENSION Original Contract.Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Channe (ADD) (/J!IDU~T.g Amended Contract Price $ $ $ $ 10 Calendar Days November 29, 1973 380 Calendar Days December 14, 1974 10 Calendar Days 45 Calendar Days 425 Calendar Days January 28, 1975 3,545,635.33 4,488.75 20,500.00 ~ ., 3,570,624.08 l>oard authoriz'1tion date: October 16, 1974 Approved: By------------~----~--~------~ Consulting Engineer By---------------------~-:--~~~ Contractor AGENDA ITEM #lO(g) -J- COU?\TY SJ\NITATimJ DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By --------------------~c~;1_1_c-~r·,__L_·1_1_0_1_n_c_c ~ 1 DISTRICT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 74-132-2 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF PIPE LINE LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY FOR RIGHT OF WAY RE CONTRACT 2-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRI9T NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING.EXECUTION OF A PIPE LINE LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY FOR RIGHT OF WAY IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THE PALM DRIVE INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-17 * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Pipe Line License Agreement, dated August 28, 1974, wherein The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway ~ompany grants to County Sanitation District No. 2 the right to construct the Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-17, through the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company right of way in the vicinity of Crowther Avenue and Carbon Canyon Channel, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment in the amount of $150.00 for use of said right of way is hereby authorized; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held October 16, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #lO(h) -K-DISTRICT 2 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM October 10, 1974 Fred A. Harper, General Manag.er Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No. 2-14-2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108-'-' ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71-') S-'0-2910 ~ (71-') 962-2" 11 Pipe installation has been completed up to the .south side of the Riverside Freeway. Tunnel work under Taft Road and the Southern Pacific Railroad has been completed-. Backfilling operations has been completed up to the south side of Lincoln Avenue. The levy on the east side of the Santa Ana River has been restored to the original shape prior to construction A field meetirig was held last week with Orange County Road Department pertaining to open cut of Lincoln Avenue. Permission was g:-anted to open cut Lincoln October 7, 1974. It was necessary to close Lincoln Bridge to all through traffic during trenching operations in order to provide maximum safety to the public and the contractor. Five 8' joints of RCP have been placed across Lincoln Avenue. Excavation of jacking pit on Grove Street has been completed and nine joints of pipe have been installed under the Riverside Freeway. Excavation of jacking pit on Riverdale Avenue has been completed and 50' of liner plate has been pushed under the AT&SF Railroad. Pipe ins.tallation is expected to begin next week on Grove Street. The contractor estimates completion of this project by the first of November 1974. REL:BEW:TR:ss • AGENDA ITEM #lO(j) L-1 DISTRICT 2 .r ( ( . ( -.. --·--CDMPL\:1f eoooe Toe~ CON51Ruc1ro B I D . Engineer's Estimate: $4,435,305 (9-11-74) $4,735,905 (10-7-74) TABULATION S.H EE T Date October 8, 1974 ~ 11 :00 A.M • Contract For: Knott Interceptor,. Reaches 5 and 6 1. Contract No. 3-20-1 CONTRACTOR Sully-Miller Contracting Co. Long Beach A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Co. ·North Hollywood, California J. F. Shea Co. Walnut 4. John A. Artukov i ch Sons, Inc. 5. 6. 8. 9. 10. Paramount Kordick & Rados Huntington Beach H. M. Byars Construction Co. Reno, Nevada AGENDA ITEM #10(1) TOTAL BID $4,602,992,00 $4,706,572.00 $4,772,710.00 $4,864,570.00 $5,249,220.00 $5 '326 ,~577. 00 -M-DISTRICT 3 RESOLUTION NO. 74-139-3 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY FROM STATE OF CALIFORNIA RE CONTRACT NO. 3-14 (REVISED) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR FACILITIES, WESTMINSTER AVENUE INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3.-14 (REVISED) * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement, dated --------- for acquisition from the State of California of approximately 1,200 sq. ft. of property located in the vicinity of Westminster Avenue and the San Diego Freeway, in connection with construction· of Westside Interceptor Facilities, Westminster Avenue Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-14 (Revised), is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That said property is more particularly delineated on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and·, Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized and directed to execute said agreement with the State of California for acquisition of the property for the amount of $100.00. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held October 16, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #lO(n) -N-DISTRICT 3 H E M 0 R A N D U M October 10, 1974 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer SUBJECT: Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No, 3-18 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (71"') 962-2411 ~ Pipe installation has been completed along Main Street up to Goldenwest. not ·be installed this week due to a parade on Saturday, October 12, 1974. parade will be routed along Goldenwest. Pipe wi 11 .The Backfill and compaction have been completed along Main Street up to Goldenwest. The 8-inch water line along the west side of Hoover has been installed and backfilled up to Hazard. The 8-inch water line is scheduled to be tested this week. The 8-inch VCP sewer along the north side of Main Street has been installed and backfilled up to Locust, and is in service. Manholes on Bolsa, west of Beach Boulevard, have been raised up to meet the proper grade of the asphalt paving and concrete collars have been placed. Curbs and gutters are complete along the east side of Hoover. The manhole on Main Street at the corner of Goldenwest is installed and will be backfilled this week. Minor adjustments have been made to the protective steel shield used in the contractor's open trench. The width has been altered from 12-feet wide to 11-feet wide in order to accommodate the smaller diameter pipe to be used on Goldenwest. Pipe installation is scheduled to resume next week. and will begin on Westminster Avenue. The contractor has f i 1 ed .a c 1 aim for add it i ona 1 compensation for changed cond it i ens·. These changed conditions are related to 8-inch and 12-inch abandoned gas mains, abnormal depth of existing pavement on Bolsa Avenue, westerly of Beach Boulevard, modification of traffic island on Bolsa Avenue between Wi·lson and Harper Streets and interference of gas mains which it is claimed are not correctly shown on the plans. The staff is evaluating the contractor's request for extra work,which work appears to be eligible changes of approximately $30,000. REL: hj e AGENDA ITEM #lO(o) 0-1 DISTRICT 3 0 I ('\.) t1 H C/l t-3 ::0 . H • 0 t-3 w CONT~ACT ~ ~-1!> ~ kN01'T lNi~Cf"PTO~ •·~·· ••111 • ;... .. ,_ COM t::;)lf.='1~ 0 0 0 0 Q io B~ CONST~()cj~ · JWe"STMlN6T~.~ · M~~lA\.· ' .. PA2~ ... ' ·' . ';-·' ' \ .. ,,· _,,,.,'"I '. .,, .. ' ' ,1 I' .. •' ·.1 ' ( COUNTY OF O~AN6e' \ . .. . . -.·. ~ ~TT INl~~~iOrl ~ MIL.E'S oF ~~11 Pl~ CONTt<ACT AWA~~DI ~-1-97?1 · COST: $ ~ '?>~'1 1 -. I~ SCHfDUL.eao'Fo~ COMPL~TlON: 9 -,_ ,~ I H E M 0 R A N D U M October 10, 1974 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108'°''°' ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71"') 5"'0-2910 (71"') 962-2411 ~ SUBJECT: Annexation No. 18 -Balsa Lease Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 11 This request for annexation covers a parcel approximately 44.2 acres in size, located adjacent to the boundaries of Sanitation District No.--11, lying westerly of Edwards Street, approximately at the westerly extension of Ellis Avenue. The Standard Oil Company of California has requested annexatiqn to Sanitation District No. 11, wherein current oil brine disposal practices can be eliminated ~ by discharging into the Sanitation District's facilities. With the annexation of these properties, Standard Oil could cease operation of their ocean outfall wherein their present discharge has received considerable notice by the City of Huntington Beach, the County and State Health Departments, as well as the Regional Water Quality Control Board because of the discoloration associated with the discharge. Although not detrimental to the marine environment or the public use of the affected beach areas, the discharge is aesthetically displeasing and attempts have been made to eliminate this discharge. The overall District's Master Plan has included this area for capacities and it is, therefore, recommended that it would be in the best interests of the tax- payers of Orange County, as well as the people of District No. 11 to annex this area to the District, but that annexation fees should be reviewed prior to establishment of the cost of annexation to the District. REL:hje AGENDA ITEM #lO(s)(l) -P-DISTRICT 11 1. I RESOLUTION NO. 74-138-11 AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS - ANNEXATION NO. 18 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 18-BOLSA LEASE ANNEXATION) * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: That an application for annexation of territory to itself be made to the Local Agency Formation Commission as follows: Section 1. That this proposal is made pursuant to Division 1 · (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California; and, Section 2. That this application is for the purpose of annexing approximately 44.19·acres in the vicinity of Ellis Avenue extended ~ westerly of Edwards Street ·to provide sanitary sewer service to said territory as requested by Sta.ndard Oil Company of Ca~ifornia, owner of said property; and, Section 3. That the territory to be annexed is u~inhabited; and, Section 4. That the designation assigned to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 18 -Bolsa Lease Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 11", the boundari·es of which are more particularly described and delineated on Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 5. That annexation of said property shall be subject to payment of fees established by the Board of Directors following a review of the District's annexation policy; an~, Section 6. That request is hereby made that such proceedings as required by law be taken to complete this annexation. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular ~eeting held October 16, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #10(s)(2)--Q-DISTRICT 11 FIL!::D In the Offi~~ cf ~he Secrf'tary County Sanitation Distr1c-No .. ~ OCT 2 .1S74 February 13, 1974 CHINO BASIN~ MUNICIPAL Sy .. Vv /.'• T t= R DISTRICT J. ANDREW SCHLANGE GENERAL MANAGER TELEPHONE (714) 987-1712 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Attention: Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager Re: Assignment of Certain Agreements Between County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and Chino Basin Municipal Water District to the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority. Gentlemen: On behalf of the Board of Directors of Chino Basin Municipal Water District, I have been authorized to request that your Boards of Directors consent to the assignment of the above- mentioned capacity, treatment and disposal agreements to the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority. As soon as you have taken action on this matter, please advise this district accordingly. Enclosed are draft copies of the Assignment Agreements for your approval. As soon as we have your consent, we shall proceed with execution of the documents. Very truly yours, .P'-/I -) ' ,. ~A/t-£_ .. ~ /Jl~,,,.J,n:,~~~-t~_/ Carl B. Masingale, C~rman Board of Directors-/ CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT /em Enclosure 8555 ARCHIBALD AVENUE. POST OFFICE BOX 697 • CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91730 ----------------~-----.,-.---------------------------------------,_,_ _____________________ __..__.._....___...- --------------~---............ -------------- CARL B. MASINGALE RAY W. FERGUSON Pre&ident V ice-Preaident AGENDA ITEM #12(a) -------------~--------------------------------------------------- ERNEST L. KEECHLER Secretar'JI -fl- JACK F. COMSTOCK Director DICK W. PEHL Director DISTRICTS 1,3,5,6,7 & 11 RESOLUTION NO. 74-130 'APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF CBMWD INTERCEPTOR CAPACITY AGREEMENT TO SAWPA A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ASSIGNMENT BY DISTRICT NO. 2 OF CHINO BASIN WASTE WATER INTERCEPTOR CAPACITY AGREEMENT TO SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJ~CT AUTHORITY * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Chino Basin Municipal Water District has requested assignment of the Waste Water Interceptor Capacity Agreement with County Sanitation District No. 2, dated April 12, 1972, to the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, which said Authority was formed for the purpose of undertaking projects for water quality control and protection, and pollution abatement in the· Santa Ana River Watershed; and, WHEREAS, the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11,dated March 10, 1971; as amended, provides that each Sanitation District, which is a party thereto, must approve ~he use of joint treatment and disposal facilities or any part thereof for the disposal of sewage and/or industrial wastes origi~ating outside the territorial limits of said Districts; and, WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 2, by Resolution No. "14-126-2, has approved assignment of the Water Waste Interceptor Capacity Agreement, subject to approval of Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11. NOW THEREFORE,the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain agreement dated for assignment to Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority of the Waste Water Interceptor Capacity Agreement between Chino Basin Municipal Water District and County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, dated April 12, 1972, is hereby approved; and, AGENDA ITEM #12(b) S-1 DISTRICTS 1,3,5,6,7 & 11 Section 2. That the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6,7 and 11, of Orange County, California, hereby approve the execution of said agreement by County Sanitation District No. 2, and authorize endorsement thereof by their respective Chairman and Secretary. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held October.16, 1974. -.. .. # AGENDA ITEM #12(b) S-2 DISTRICTS 1,3,5,6,7 & 11 .._,,. RESOLUTION NO. 74-131 APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF CBMWD TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL AGREE~IBNT TO SAWPA A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF CHINO BASIN WASTE WATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL AGREEMENT TO SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County have heretofore entered into a Waste Water . Treatment and Disposal Agreement dated April 12, 1972, with Chino Basin Municipal Water District to permit treatment. and disposal of waste water from said Water District by means of ·the joint facilities of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11; and, WHEREAS, the Chino Basin Municipal Water District has requested assignment of said agreement to the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, which said Authority was formed for the purpose of undertaking projects for water quality control and protection, and pollution abatement in the Santa Ana River Watershed. NOW THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain agreement dated , ----------------------- in form approved by the General Counsel, for assignment to Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority of the Waste Water Treatment and Disposal Agreement between Chino Basin Municipal Water District and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, dated April 12, 1972, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That the respective Chairmen and Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 are hereby authorized to execute said Agreement on behalf of their respective Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held October 16, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #12(c) -T-ALL DISTRICTS RESOLUTION NO. 74-140 AMENDING RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATIVE TO CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT RESOLUTION NO. 70-3 2 AS AMENDED A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATIVE TO CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT RESOLUTION NO. 70-3, AS AMENDED, RE DEFINITION OF OVERTIME * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Section 4 of Resolution No. 70-3, as ·amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows: and, "Section 4. If, in the judgment of the General Manager, or his designee, work beyond the prescribed workday and/or work week, or work on a paid holiday or on a regularly scheduled day off, as prescribed herein, is requi!'ed of an employee, such work will be considered overtime service and will be compensated for as provided in Section 16 of the Districts' most current positions and salaries resolution. Section 2. That any other resolutions or motions or portions thereof that conflict.herewith are hereby repealed and made of no further effect. AGENDA ITEM #1!~ -U-ALL DISTRICTS MEETING DATE Oc t o ber 1 6 . 1974 TIME 7:30 p .m. DISTRICTS 1 ,2 ,3 ,5,6 ,7 ,8 & 1 1 DISTRICT 1 C\(<:.) 13(0.l ~GARTH~) ••••• PATTERSON •••• ~___:::__±____ CLARK) •••••• BATTIN ••••••• ~±-.__±___ RIMA •••••• ••• _9::::::-~ _-3::__ (LANGLEY) •••• SALTARELLI ••• ___1::::... ~ ...±..._ DISTRICT 2 E.WI NGl • • • • · ·CHAPUT •••••• ~ _+_ --= L lS • • • • • ·CALLAHAN· • • • · __L.. _+_ ~ BA ER • • • • • ·CLARK • • • • • • · ~ ~ ~ PATTE~SON) • ·GARTHE •• •• • • · V _t__ _:t__ NEVI~) •••••• GRAHAM······· .......J:::::.: _T_---= THOM) •• • • • ·KAYWOOD. •• • • · v ..::t__ _-r_ FOX) ••• ·.··MAC KAIN .. •••• V--+ -------PERRY •••••••. ~.±___---= !STANTON) SCOTT········~---=--= PEREZ · • ••• TEMPLE •• • • • • • __L_ -+ DUNN~~ •• • ••• WINN • •• • • • • • ~ -+ ...:t..._ ROOT) ••••••. WQOD ••• • •• • • ~ _-r _ _±__ DISTRICT 3 ! MAC KAIN_). ···FOX···· • • • • • • ~ _+ _ _±_ NUIJENS)····ARBISO ······· ~ _+ __ +_ CLARK)······BATTIN······· ~ _T_ .±__ MC KNEW).··· ·BLACKMAN·····~ i_ --=. COLLINs) •••• BYRNE········~ _:±__ .:±__ CULVER······· ~ ..±...__. _+_ (MEYER) • • • • • ·DAVIS···· • • • • V-....::t__ _:t__ EDWARDS · • • • • • ~ ...±____ -(PATT~RSON) •. GARTHE·······~ _+_ T (THOM)·······KAYWOOD······ \/""" _+_ .±...___ ........ cox . . . . . . . . . ~ t -+ !yr· ·NG).···· ·NEVIL·· .. •••· ,_,..--+----::::: W ~D) • • • • • • ·ROOT· • • • • • • • • ~ --+-~ LACAYo) ••••• soNJU········ Q_. ()...... a..... SCOTT) • • • • • • SVA LS Tld) • • • • • V------ COEN) .. •••• ·WIEDER······· ~ ~ -t DISTR1 CT 5 JOINT BOARDS (DUNNE) • • • • • • WINN • • • • • • • • _lL_ NUIJENS) • • • • ARB ISO · • • · · ·• v - CLARK) • • • • • • BAKER • • • • • • · 0--== CLARK) • • • • • • BATTIN • • • • • • V' MC KNl;W) • • • • • BLACKMAN • • • • __L._ -- PRYOR) • • • • • • BURTON • • • • • • ~ -- COLL 1 Is) · · · . BYRNE ••••••• _L_ == L VONS • • • • • • CALLAHAN • • • • v-- EWING .• • • • • • CHAP UT • • • • • ·--;:::::--- BAKER • • • • • • CLARK .········ Cv -- CULVER • • • • • • --V --~MEYER) DAVIS · • • • • • · 1,......-: -- MC IN.NIS). • •• DOSTAL ••••. ·~~ COEN) ••••••. DUKE ••••••.•. ___i.::::.::_ ~3 "1 1 lD EDWARDS •••• ·~ -- (MAC KAIN)···· FOX··.-••.••• ·~ -- (PATTERSON) • • GARTHE • • .••. ~ -- (COEN) ·······GIBBS •• ·• • • ·--1::::::... == GLOC KNER .•• ·--1..L. ~NEVIL) •••••• GRAHAM ••••• ·~ -- PEREf:) • • • • • • JACKMA'N • • • • • ~ -- THOM) ••••••• KAYWOOD •••• ·---1:::::::::: == . . ....... cox . . . . . . . . ~ l F 0 X J • • • • • • • • MAC KA I N • • • • • ,,.---- RY CK Of F) •••• ~€ IPH4 HJ. I • I -- YOUNG) ••.••• NEVIL ••••..•. ~ -- GARTHE) ••••• PATTERSON •. ·~ -- p E RR Y • • • · • • · --1::::::::... --. · RIMA· •• • •• •. ~ -- R96EuRS 0 I I -------- . (wooD) ••••••• ROOT •••••••• ::= -- !LANGLEY) • • • . SAL TAR ELLI • .---1:::::::_ -- STANTON) • •• • SCOTT · •••• • .---1L. -- LACAYO) ••••• SONJU •••.••• a_, -- MC INN.Is)·· • • STORE • • • · • · .---- SCOTT) • • • ••• S.V ALSTAD • • • · ,_.. -- ~PERE~) • • • • • · TEMPLE • • · • • • i.< -- COEN • • ••••• WI EDER ••. •. '--k::: - ROOT • • •• · •• WOOD • • · • • • · • v---------- (BAKER) • • • • • ·CLARK ··· • · · · · --9.L_ ----fY'..e rvv--' (RYCKOfF) ····MC INNIS • • • • • ~ ----~ * * * * * * * * * ROGERS ••.••.. ~ ----OTHERS DISTRICT 6 RIMA·········~ _Q::_ ___2:::_ (CLARK) •• • • • -BATTIN· ~"t"; ~ _-r_ 2-- (MC INNIS).·· .STORE········~ _;-_ _:t_ DISTRICT 7 l LANGL~Y) •••• SALTARELLI ••• ~ ~ __±.___ PRYOR • • • • • 0 B URTON· • • • • •• ~ ...:t_ _;-_ BAKER ••• ... CLARK········ CL.. ~ ~--(C -J- MC INNIS) •••• DOSTAL·· •• ••• ~ _:t.__ ~..,r; ri.n"' GLOCKNER····· V----...:t__ ...±__ (PEREZ) •••••• ~A~·····-~---=-~ (GARTHE) ••••• PATTERSON •••• ~--=-_±.__ Dl RICT 11 (COEN) ·······DUKE·········~~~ (CLAR K)···· ··BAKER········ 0....-~ ~ (COEN) ·······GIBBS········~ _:t__ __.±.__ DISTRICT 8 MITCHELL· • • • • _k:::: ---1 (BAKER) • • • • • ·CLARK · • • • • • • • ~ --__ "j\.O~\.u.:vv-' (JOHNSON) ····HOLM ·········~ ---0 1 0/1 6/74 HARPER SYLVESTER LEWI S CLAR KE TAYLO R BROWN NISSON EWING HOH EN ER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVENS ACTION TAKEN BY J OINT BOARDS RE AGENDA ITEM NO . 13 CONCERNING ACQUISI TI ON OF PROPERTY IM ME DI ATE LY ADJACENT T0 1 TREATMENT PLANT NO . 2 : 13(a) ~e"8iW. appraisal rep ort dated August 13, 1 974, on the 8-acre parcel of property located adjacent to the northerly Treatment Plant No . 2 property line (Covington a nd Ayres parce l ) prepared by Everett S . Schmid , Real Es tat e Appraiser ; and ,~ ytJMlttf/~ authorized the staff to negotiate with t he prope r ty owner for purchase of t he 7 .168-acre parcel (Covington parcel). ~ ~1 ei .,~ fi~,~~ ~~i ~ .. L---µ . JP) LJ "" ~~....,..: -~-'I-_ -~ ~ ~t.~ ~ ,,..~T, .. ~.:fk 1/r:;:;;;:~t ·~ ~' ,.,..__._n ,,...J J'L-:Ve::::LJ ~ ,,.._u e.,.l.P ~ • ...l..J-tl-( 13 (b) ~ Aµproved appraisal rep ort dated J u ly 29 , 19 7 4 , on the 3-acre parcel located adjacent to the south- westerly corner of Treatment Plant No . 2 , prepared by Everett S . Sch mid , Real Estate Appraiser ; and J <i=t Pv1r.f7~.ry, {.,(,.,-~U)J authori zed the staff to negotiate with the property owner for acquisiti on of said parce l (Rinker parcel). ·~ ACTION TAKEN BY JOINT BOARDS RE AGENDA ITEM NO. 13 CONCERNING ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2: 13(a) Approved appraisal report dated August 13, 1974, on the 8-acre parcel of property located adjacent to the northerly Treatment Plant No. 2 property line (Covington and Ayres parcel) prepared by Everett S. Schmid, Real Estate Appraiser; and authorized the staff to negotiate with the property owner for purchase of the 7.168-acre parcel (Covington parcel). 13(b) Approved appraisal report dated July 29, 1974, on the 3-acre parcel located adjacent to the south- westerly corner of Treatment Plant No. 2, prepared by Everett S. Schmid, Real Estate Appraiser; and authorized the staff to negotiate with the property owner for acquisition of said parcel (Rinker parcel). October 1 6 , 1974 Joint Mtg . Report of the Joint Chairman Regarding the Sept. 25th Open House, the Joint Chairman reported a total of 92 elected officials and city administrative staff attended. There were a number of State legis l atures to attend but the Governer called a special meeting that day so were unable to attend . Men tioned letter received from Senator Whetmore. Winn said cong ratulati ons should go to staff. Report of the General Manager FAH reported on meetings in Denve r. Said at one of the lunche ons had Assistant Administrator of EPA for Water and Hazardous Materials . They are doing some thinking and administration is looking for some ways to cut some of their programs. Looking at water pollution program to see where they can cut what they have already agreed to. One thing that came out of survey was that original ly cost was to be $1 8 bi l l i on . Afte r two years based on federal law, survey is now up to $340 billion. Puts the whole thing out of site . Have had some hearings before Senate and House Committees involved with water pollu- tion control matters. EPA is considering rec omm ending to t he administration that they propose l egislation for a "b uy out" program , which would mean they would spend maybe $1 1 0 mil l ion for next 10 years and then say it is up to local communities. Local communit i es are strapped to even provide the kind of service expected . Mentioned another area EPA has some difficulty on is requirements. Said we commented and objected to 85% BOD & chlorination requirement and now find that because of chlorination requirement, have driven price of chlorine out of sight. Local communities having a terr i ble time even getting the material. We have not had to comply with numbers that many of the entities have already been complying with. Said another problem is their excess capacity--amount of capacity in a treatment plant that is going to be constructed--whether for 10 or 20 years growth . This is being administrated in an inconsistent manner. Different rules but spending same money . Another problem area is user charge situati on where General Accounting Office has ruled out ad valorem taxes as means of getting revenue . We would spend $1/2 million per District on another kind of collection program . Admini stration is going t o Congress and ask that that be changed immediately and will have some leg islation also they will be proposing in the new Congress having to do with discharges to marine environment. Said they couldn't agree among themselves in group appointed by Russell Train . They made an EPA option paper--gave recomm endat ion of three or four things . Regarding secondary treatment requir ement for ocean dischargers, in five or ten years from now, when federal money is all spent , they may decide that we have to do it so we oppose that concept . Mr . Harper said that in AMSA meeting we proposed that a new le gislative committe e be set up representing the major entities throughout the United States. Said they went for this idea and listed representative s that would be in this group . The purpose of the group will be to bring together the le gis lators who are represented and d iscuss the individual problems. This will be the beginning of getting something done. Said the key to any changes in the Wa ter Pollution Control Act is in the Senat e , n ot on the House side . Is a chance that Senator Muskie may move out of the position of handling the subcommittee that handles the environmental problem . He is chairman of another committ ee and has to get out of one of them. FAH said we will be working with SWRCB to come up with new numb ers as to what the true costs are . Report of the General Cou n sel Nisson said he spent time reading extensive discuss~on of l ast mon t h 's me etin g . Have done some work on contracts and said most of wha t he h ad to say would come up und er item #1 3 . Golden West Fertilizer Kaywood asked if we reject this proposal, what kind of better offer do we get? FAH said that we had no better offer at the present time . Said it was his understanding that the current contractor will then request to terminate the agreement with us. We have use of his equipment for a period of 90 days. Kaywood then asked if there was any other means? FAH said we will have to i nvest igate. Security Monitoring System Question was asked if we have had any problems that have promulgated this? Was answered , yes, we have had two problems in the last 8 months . Winn asked Director Temple if he would assist the staff in obtaining these proposals as his job is buying this type of equipment . Said he would. (9c) Change Orders under $25,000 Byrne asked if resolution included the total paragraph as found in the Executive Committee report which is more than in the agenda--that all items that are not a necessity will come before us and we will receive monthly reports. REL answered .that resolution stipulates any unforeseen work but will bring to you. Was asked what time period was--could they need $25,000 one day and another $25,000 another day? Ray answered not in any one instance. Action has to be taken at that particular time. Usually is 4-5 weeks before being able to bring them back to the Board . This is limitation placed on Dept . of Transportation. This $25,000 is if they don't anticipate it. Byrne then asked if we could have resolution include the entire paragraph--staff report that covers the handling of non-emergency items plus progress reports on emergency items? Nissan stated that we wouldn't want it part of this resolution but could make it a motion in addition to resolution. Root asked when you do approve something, does this eventually get back to the Board for at least recognition by the Board. FAH said they are placed in a monthly progress report to District so Directors could see. Kaywood then asked what would happen in the event there would be som e kind of emergency where it would exceed $25,000. Nissan said we would call a special Board meeting or staff would act and hope the Board would ratify it. Mr . Harper added that what we have done in the past on these situations was generally to cal l the Chairman and discuss seriousness of it and consequences. Scott said he wanted a point of information. Since we have been operating without this policy in the past, have we had that many problems? Winn advised that the $25,000 amount is the standard amount that the Dept. of Transportation uses. Ray described some recent p ~oblems that we have had where we have had to almost shut job down and have had to authorize contractor to operate on a force account basis or enter into another agreement for method of payment and hope that Board would ratify our actions. Said our construction program is at an all-time high so situations occur more often. Scott then asked if the Board had ever not ratified what was asked for and REL said not to his knowledge. Temple asked what was wrong with hoping and praying the Board would ratify actions? Doesn 't that make you think a little more? Said he thought that process being used such as contacting the Chairman of the District keeps Directors involved. Store questioned what would happen in the absence of the General Manager. Assumed that same process would be employed as for more than $25,000. Called for the question. MacKain said he agreed with what is being asked for here but should be in the form of a percentage. -2 - / (13a) I (13b) Ray answered that he had contemplated $25.,000 or 1% of contract , but for a $60,000 contract, would be more than 1% of contract. Cost on $60,000 contract is the same as $5,000,000 project. Oniy reason for $25,000 is that it is standard in other Standard Specifications . Nisson added that the nature of change orders are unforeseen or unanticipated conditions. These type of change o r ders can't lend themselves to a percentage of the contract . Are usually under $25 ,0 00 and said that was why he thought that a "fixed figure is most desirable rather than percentage. Arbiso commented that he thought the motion is practical. Only right and proper that the General Manager be held responsible for all . actions. Said none of us a r e technically know ledgable to question. CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. Roll Call vote. Did not pass. Winn asked whether the General Manager should suggest a lower amount if Directors desired. Duke stated that staff has been doing this and if we as a Board feel staff has overwritten the contract, we will have to accept the liability. Winn asked Duke if he would vote against it in any amount and Duke answered, yes . Nevil suggested that in Section 1 that the words "without Board approval" might be added. Said he didn't know if that would make it acceptable or not. Winn then advised that the General Manager had asked that this item be withdrawn. Nissen added that the Directors should consider that by not establishing any procedure that they authorized the staff that there is no limit at this time . If you set forth $25,000 that they must come to the Board for, then you have reduced your liability. Winn then stated that unless there were some objections from Directors, this item will be considered tabled . Acquisition of 8 -acre parcel of property The Chair entertained a mbtion on the 7~ acre parcel known as th e Covington Parcel to accept appraisal as submitted and authorize staff to negotiate to acquire property. It was so moved and seconded. Motion carried. No votes to be recorded: Nevil, Chaput, Temple, Perez, and ~. '(v..e ~ Acquisition of 3-acre parcel It was then moved and seconded to accept appraisal and authoriz e negotiation to acquire 3-acre parcel. Roll Call vote. Motion carried . Chaput requested that his no vote be recorded. Dostal abstained . Winn sai d that the Counsel advised that it would be in the best int e rest of the District to coordinate with the Ci t y of Huntington Beach after the property was acquired . Substitute subcontractor for Pl-16 is s on reported subcontractor cannot enter the proposed agreement and subcontractor not licensed in California . Motions carried. Rejection of bids re J -6-l REL reported that one bid was received for $1~600,000+. Said in the evaluation of the engineer 's proposal, felt that perhaps th e rejecting of this bid and with the authority for the staff and Genera l Manager to ne g otiat e and other items could be contracted on a bid -3- basis, felt that amount on bid could substantially be reduced . Don't know what reduced amount wou l d be at this time . (23) DIST . 2 -Other business Chaput stated that he thought we should look back into District 2's annexation costs in conjunct i on with Reach 3 of the Santa Ana River Interceptor. Winn asked if we didn 't have an annual review and FAH answered that we have an annual escalation but not an annual review. Thought that request is a good one as : we haven 't looked at the whole picture for a long time . Winn then asked if staff would like to have some of the Directors get together with them. Mr . Harper said they would get some numbers ~ogether first . It was moved and seconded to direct staff to look into this. (41) Report re Master Plan facilities Conrad Hohener referred to map and schedule in folders. Currently have $10,135,000 under construction. Reviewed various Master Plan facilities and costs. In the l ast three or four months price of pipe has increased over 70%. Pipe constitutes about 40% of contract cost . 10% is other costs and 50% for labor. Remainder of construction comes up to $26,738,000. Average family spends $50 for Sanitation Districts services. Root asked if we anticipate any rebudgeting. FAH said we will budget the work depending on financial capacity of the Dis t rict. ~) Requests of Cypress & Buena Park REL reported that in November of last year we rece i ved letters from Buena Park and Cypress requesting additional lines to accommodate deve l opment in their cities. Buena Park wanted sewer in La Palma Ave. and Crescent Ave. This is a sewer that the City needed for their own facilities. The staff feels that the District developed a Master Plan and a certain criteria of the area that we wou l d serve. Do not fe e l that the request from Buena Park falls within criteria established by Board so would not recommend that that sewer be constructed by Sanitation District and incorporated within our system. Request from Cypress is for sewer in Katella Ave . extending up easterly past Walker Street to serve a proposed industrial development in that area. Fee l we should incorporate that in our system. Feel it does fit within our criteria. Can go both ways on alignment. New alignment would move trunk sewer 1/4 mile closer to area they need to serve. Will not change the operation of our system . Cost is about the same. Will be more pavement replacement one way and need acquisition of right of way the other way . Recommendation is deny request from Buena Park and adopt alignment suggested to accommodate City of Cypress. -4-