HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-10-16COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
Gentlemen:
October 10, 1974
NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 & 11
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 1974, 7:30 P.M.
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
The next meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 11 of Orange County,.
California, will be held at the above hour and date.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
--'-'-------------------------,-----·-------
P. 0. BOX Bl 27, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
OCTOBER 3, 1974
OCTOBER MEETING DATE REMINDER
OCTOBER 16, 1974
TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS, l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 & 11
JOINT CHAIRMAN WINN HAS ASKED THAT YOU BE REMINDED THAT THE
DISTRICTS WILL HOLD THEIR OCTOBER JOINT BOARD MEETING ON
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16TH, RATHER THAN OCTOBER 9TH. AGENDA
MATERIAL WILL BE MAILED ON THURSDAY, OCTOBER 10TH, PRECEDING
THE MEETING DATE.
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County San itation Dist ricts
of Orange· Count y, California
JOINT ·eoA RDS
Regular Meeting
October 16, 1974 -7:30 p.m.
Post OHice Box 8127
10844 El I is A ve nue
Fountain Valley, Cal if., 9 270 8
Te lephones:
Area Code 7 1 4
540-2910
962-2411
The followin g is a brief explanation of the more important,
non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which
are not o t herwise self-explanatory . Warrant lists are not attached
to the agenda since they are made up immediate l y preceding the
meeting, but will appear in the Supplemental Agenda available at
the meeting.
Jo i nt Boards
Nos. 8 and 9 -Report of the Executive Committee and Actions on
t h e Committee 's Recommendations.
The Committ ee met on October 2nd and a written report of the
meeting together wi th the recommendations to the Joint Boards is in-
cluded with the agenda material.
No . 10 -Consent Calendar.
The foll ow ing item s fall into this category in ac cordance with
the definition established by the Boards :
No. 10-a -Change Order No. 4 ~o the Plans and Specifications
for J ob No . P2-2 2 .
This change order authorizes an extension of contract time of
61 calendar d~ys for delays experienced by the contractor on the
delive r y of equipment . It is recommended that the change order be
appr oved as the contractor 's request for the time extension is justified
and will not affect the contract price.
No. 10-b -Acceptance of J ob No . P2 -21 as Complete.
Res o luti on No . 7 4 -1 28 accepts Di g est e rs "N" and "O" at Plant
No. 2 as complet e and a uthorizes e xecution and recordation of a
Notice o f Completion, and approves a Final Closeout Agreement with
the contractor . We h ave been pleased with the performance o f the
contrac tor , Hemisphere Constructors, of Bellflower.
No. 10-c -Purchase of Three Electric Carts.
The Districts advertised for the purchase of three electric
carts; while we solicited quotations from three firms, only one bid
was received ($5,855.17). In the current budget, we budgeted $5,724
for carts for our Operations Department. The staff recommends that
a Purchase Order in the amount of $5,855.17 be issued to Taylor-Dunn
Manufacturing Company.
No. 10-d -Interdepartmental Transfer of Personnel.
We are requesting that one Mechanic II position be moved from
the Mechanical Division to the Maintenance Division. ·Approval of this
-request will enable us to provide the needed number .of personnel re-
quired in the Maintenance Division without adding any additional
positions or personnel.
District No. 2
No. 10-f -Proposal of Lowry and Associates for-Design Services
for the Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reach 3.
In accordance with the instructions given the staff by the Board
on October 2, an engineering design proposal has been received from
Lowry and Associates. It is the staff's recommendation that the
proposal be accepted, with the provision that the General Manager be
authorized to limit the engineers' scope of work to that portion of
Reach ·3 from the terminus of Contract No. 2-14-2 in La Palma Avenue
to Imperial Highway. It is recommended that t h e design of the remaining
portion of Reach 3 from Imperial Highway to the Co u nty boundary be de-
ferred until receipt of project conceptual approval from the State Water
Resources Control Board and the Environmental Protection Agen~y.
No. 10-g -Change Orders Nos. 3 and 4 to Contrac t No. 2-1 4 -2.
Included with the agenda material are two change orders to Con-
tract No. 2-14-2 for additional work required by the contractor on the
Santa Ana River Interceptor from Katella to La Palma Avenues. It is
recommended that the additional costs and time extension therefor be
approved as described in the change orders.
No. 10-h -Pipeline License Agreement for Contract No. 2-17.
The staff has worked out an agreement with the Santa Fe Railway
Company for right of way in connection with .con struc t ion of the Palm
Drive Interceptor Sewer. The Company has agreeq to a License Agreement
for a one-time cost to the Districts of $150. The staff recommends
approval of Resolution No. 74-132-2.
...
District No. 2
No. 10-i -Proposed Annexation No. 11 -District No. 2
. ·· ... -.·· . -~ .
The staff has reviewed the request for annexation of Tract
No. 8713 which is located in the City of Anaheim. A tentative map
for the construction of 10 homes on half-acre and larger lots has
been approved by the Anaheim City Council. The proposed densities
are consistent with the District's Master Plan of Sewers; therefore,
it is recommended that the Board authorize initiation of proceedings
to annex the area to the District.
District No. 3
No. 10-1 -Award of Contract· No. 3-20-1.
The standard resolution appearing in the agenda awards the .con-
tract for construction of the Knott Interceptor Sewer, Reaches 5 and
6, to Sully-Miller Contracting Company in the amount of $4,602,992.
Six bids were received and it is the staff's recommendation that the
contract be awarded to the low bidder.
No. 10-m -Claim Against the District.
"The District has received another legal document in conjunction
with a claim which has been filed against the District and the City
of Westminster. The action in the ·agenda refers the matter to our
General Counsel and the District_s' liability" insurance carrier for
appropriate action.
District No. 7
Nos. 10-p-q-r -Annexations to the District.
The three actions appearing on the agenda are standard resolutions
authorizing the initiation of proceedings to annex territory to the
District. Proposed Annexation No. 42 encompasses 23-plus acres on
which single-family residences will be constructed. The development
densities are in conformance with the District's Master P~an of Sewers.
Proposed annexations Nos. 43 and 44 are for two single-family
residences; one encompasses three-quarters 9f an acre, while the other
is one acre. The proposed densities anticipated for these properties
conform to the District's Master Plan.· It is therefore recommended
that the three standard resolutions initiating annexation proceedings
be approved.
District No. 11
No. 10-s -Proposed Annexation No. 18 to the District.
Pursuant to the Board's instructions, the staff has reviewed the
request of Standar.d Oil Company of California for annexation of
approximately 44 acres of territory in the vicinity of Ellis Avenue
-3-
-
extended, easter ly of Edwards Street. This area should logical l y be
served by District No . 11 and t he City of Huntington Beach . Dur i ng
t he course of reviewing this r equest fo r annexation , it was apparent
that the annexation fees adopted in 1964 do not re f lect the true
curr ent costs for p r o v iding service to the area ; therefore , i t is
r ecommended that the Board direct the staff to evaluate the present
annexation policy and fee schedules and approve Reso l ution No . 74 -138-11
a uthor izing in i tiation of proceedings to annex the proposed Bo l sa Lease
annexation subject to fees which will be determined following receipt
of the staff eva l uation report.
Jo i nt Boards
No. 12 - Approval of Ass i gnment of Agreements .
Th e Chino Basin Municipal Water District has requested assignment
o f t heir agreements with District No . 2 and t he Joint Boards for waste -
water interceptor capacity and wastewater treatment and disposal
c apacities to the Santa Ana Watershed Pro je ct Authority (SAWPA). SAWPA
i s a joint powers authority whose members are, the Chino Basin Municipal
Water District , the Orange County Water District, Western Mun icipal
Water District and the San Bernardino Municipal Water District . This
agency has been established to construct the Upper Basin wastewater
collection facilities and is recognized by the State. Water Resources
Control Board and the Env ironmental Protection Agency as the contract-
i ng agent for the Upper Basin . It is therefore recommended that the
assignment agreement be approved in form acceptable to the General
Counsel.
No . 13 -Report of the General Counsel re: Additional Land
Acquisition· at Treatment Plant No . 2 (Eight -acre Parcel and Three -
Acre Parcel).
.
The General Counsel will d i scuss certain lega l ram i fications con-
cerning the actions taken by the Board and staff to date.
No . 14 -Amend i ng Rules and Regulations re: Conditions of
Employm ent .
Our Payroll Department has experienced considerable difficulty
computing the overtime premium pay in accordance with the Federal
Guidelin es , i .e ., time -and -a -half for eligible employees for work
performed in excess o f 40 hours ac tually worked per week . Our attempt
to follow the precis e provisions of the Federal law has result ed in
considerable extra cost f or account ing personnel and has led to con-
fusion and dissatisfaction among our employees . Th ereYore , I am
recommending that the overtime provisions be changed , effective October
1st , to provide that all eligible employees be paid time -and -a -half
for all work performed over and a bove their regular work schedules,
including hol idays, whether or not they worked 40 hours in that week .
We bel i eve the additional expense to the Districts wil l be negligible,
in that the extra payroll accountin g time will be eliminated .
-4-
' ' I
t
!
I
i
t · I
I
~ ......
No. 17 -Consideration of Action re: Bids on Job No. J-6-1.
On September 5th, we opened bids for the construction of two
ocean outfall engine-driven booster pumps. The engineer's estimate
was $1,390,000 million and only one bid was received ($1,678,700).
The .staff has been evaluating this bid and as of now, we are not in
a position to recommend award of the contract. An agenda item will
appear on the Supplemen~al Agenda recommending a course of action
at the meeting.
District No. 3
No. 41 -Review of the District's Master Plan of Interceptor
Sewers.
The District's engineer will report on the construction progress
to date and give an over-all review of the future construction re-
quired to complete the District's Master Plan and its relationship
to the needs of the various communities in the west and north ·portions
of the District.
No. 42 -Report on Requests for Modification of the District's
Master Plan.
Earlier this year, the District received requests from the Cities
of Cypress and Buena Park, requesting that additional interceptor
sewers be constructed to serve their communities. The District's staff
and engineers have reviewed the requests and will report their recom-
mendations to the Board.
No. 43 -Request for Proposal for Engineering Services.
It is the staff's recommendation that we begin the design of the
facilities desc~ibed in the District's Master Plan to provide the
sewage capacities necessary to serve the needs of the westerly portion
of the District, which encompasses Los Alamitos, La Palma, and portions
of Cypress.
-5-
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
STATE CAPITOL
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 9:5814'
T~• (911ll 44~28~
COMMITTSIES
9UalN-a ANO ~OJ'l'.SSIONS
HZALTH AND WELFARE
PuaL.JC E:MPl..CYMENT AND
Dl11T1'1CT 01'1"1Clt JAMES E. WHETMORE
llAHK OF AMERICA BUILDING
&UITlt 312
TH1'n'Y·FIFTH SENATORIAl. DISTRICT
ORANG£ AND 1..0S ANGEL.£5 COUNTIES
RETIREMENT
T--P09'TATION
..m..ECT C:O...M~S 0 SOUTH HA,.80" BOULKVARO
~_..HEIM, CALIFORNIA 9280:5
'TIU.,tpftONl!1 (71.Cl 891.114'0
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE
CHAIRMAN
SENATE COMM1TTEE ON
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT AND RETIREMENT
September 26, 1974
!-1r. Donald Winn, Chairman
Joint Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
·Dear Hr. Winn:
.5M41.1. BUSINESS ENTl[llPRtaES
CHJ.UHt&N AND YOUTH
5'.IBCOMM ITTll:IUI
NUT1'1TION AND HUM"N NltEDS
INYEST...wT OP' ~UBI.IC FUNDa
~nn' COtOUTTKES
EDUCATIONAL GOALS AND
EVAWATION
SmslilU: SAl"ETY
aOAIU>a AN.D COMlollS510N9
CALIFORNIA COlolMISSION ON ACINO
AMEfllCAN REVOLUTION
atCl!NTENNIAL COMMISSION
'D11' CALtl"ORNIA
~J.A EKlt"CENCY COUNCIL
My Administrative Assistant, Bob Eichenberg, has told me
how impressed he was with the dinner meeting and tour of
your Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach facilities. I
have it from a number of friends who ·are members of your
Board of Directors that we have one the most efficient,
w~ll-run set of sanitation facilities in the country. I
am sorry that I was not able to be there to see the
presentation.
One factor that Bob mentioned is the pride that all the
people showed who were associated with the operation of the
facilities. An administration that can engender such pride
and norale has done much to insure the continued· effective
operation of a very complex system at the least cost to the
ta~q>ayers.
You, your Board of Directors, the administrators, and the
individual workers are to be congratulated for your excellent
performance. I realize that the future poses problems with'
regard to population growth and the more restrictive
standards of the EPA.. I know you will be able to overcome
these challenges, and I will be happy.to heln wherever I
can. Again, thank you for the hospitality shown my
representative.
Cor~~~y yours, _L. ----
//~ (_. lt_1 · L~ .. ~--C
JJLIBS E. HHETr:oRE
Senator, 35th District
JT.-V/kr
~13
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
THE SEPTEMBER 25TH DINNER MEETING AND TOUR OF THE SANITATION
DISTRICTS' FACILITIES WAS VERY SUCCESSFUL, 92 ELECTED OFFICIALS
AND CITY ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PEOPLE ATTENDED. MANY STATE
LEGISLATORS WERE INVITED; HOWEVER) THE GOVERNOR CALLED A SPECIAL
SESSION OF THE LEGISLATURE IN SACRAMENTO THAT DATE) SO THEY WERE
UNABLE TO ATTEND. A LETTER FROM SENATOR WHETMORE WAS INCLUDED IN
YOUR AGENDA MAILING) WHICH COMPLIMENTED US ON OUR FACILITIES AND
THE ENTHUSIASM OF OUR EMPLOYEES.
Ar THE PRESENT TIME) WE ARE NOT PLANNING AN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
MEETING FOR THIS MONTH.
II
FILE ................ -
LETIER ············-
A/C .... TKlR ••••
••••••••••••••h•ooouo._
-H•-•OOOH-0 0 .... 0-
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitat ion Distric:ts
of Orange County , Cal ifo rnia
Post OHice Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Foun t a in Va ll ey, Calif., 927 08
Telephones:
·JOINT BOARDS Area Code 71 4
540 -2910
962-2411
AG EM DA
ADJOU RNMENTS POSTED .~
COMP & MILEAGE ..... ~ ..
FILES SET UP •..... t:::: .......... .
RESOLUTIONS CERTIFIED _.
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
LETIEl\S WRITIEN ... .c ..... ..
MINUTES WRITIEN ..... \:.: .. _ OC TOB ER 16, 197 4 -7:30 P.M.
MINUTES HLED ..... w, ..... -
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll Call
(3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessar y ~{i::> -..ctt.1~
( 4) EACH DISTRICT
'l.• ~·""""
( ru~~g;·)
o'\~
Consideration of motions approving minutes of the
following meetings, as mailed:
District 1
District 2
District 3
(District 5
District 6
District 7
(District 8
District 11
September 11 , 1974 re gular and
October 9, 1 974 regular
September 11, 1 974 regular,
Octobe,r 2, 1974 adjourned and c..i~~,.._.
October 9, 1974 regular
September 11, 1974 regular and
October 9, 1974 regular
September 11 , 1974 regular and
October 9, 19 7 4 regular
September 11, 1974 regular and
October 9 , 1974 regular
September 11, 1974 regular and
October 9, 1974 regular
July 10, 1974 re gular and
October 9, 1974 regular
September 11, 1 974 re g ular and
October 9, 1974 regular
FILE .................. @ ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Joint Chairman
lf·-.... ··----·-
A .... TKLR _ / ( {:.. '\ --·-··---\~ ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the General Manager
ALL DISTR I CTS
Report of the General Counsel
J
(8)
M\~
(9)
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of
motion to receive and file the Committee's written report
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of action on items recommended by the
me i>.~---····-··-· Executive Committee: W•1·••Q
LETIER ·········-· (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and reject
A/c .... TKl.R •• the proposal of Golden West Fertilizer Company, dated
···-··---··--h \s September 10, 1974, regarding disposition of Districts'
-----·--centrifuge sludge· See page 11 A11
!~···-·········
lETIE ··-·--· Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to
obtain proposals for providing a security monitoring
system for Districts' offices, laboratory, warehouse
and shops
FILE •. Y .. :.~. " Consideration of Resolution No. 74-127, delegating autho-
rity to the General Manager to approve change orders to
contracts for unforeseen or unanticipated conditions
encountered in connection with contracts for
construction of sewerage facilities, in an amount
---LmER ···-·=ilf C II V t C no a o e or ast ~~~~:::~~nanimous Balle~
FILE ···-··-·········
lEmll --···-
A/C •.•. TXll -·
(d)
M~
not to exceed $25, 000. See page 11 B11
( •• ~ ~-41)
Consideration of motion to receive and file staff
report on Analysis of Southern California Edison
Company's Electrical Energy Charges, dated
September 26, 1974
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered
as not requiring discussion or further explanation and
unless any particular item is requested to be removed from
the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member
of the public in attendance, there will be no separate
discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar
will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on th e
consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar
shall be considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the
consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from
the consent calendar.
Roll Call vote or cast Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing
unanimous Ballot on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same.
ALL DISTRICTS
(a)
A/C -.TKLR .•.•
... ---··-··-··-----
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4,
to the plans and specifications for Digesters 11 N11 and
11 0 11 at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-21, granting an extension
of time of 6'1 calendar days to the contract with
Hemisphere Constructors. See page "C 11
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 3 )
-2-
(10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
ALL DISTRICTS
FILE ~-r········-c b ) l , _ _::;, 71,,, ~
~ •••• .:. ••.• l-::'!"-i:::-
A/C •••• TKLR ..••
~~ .. ;..
(,,,,_ ~ L \.,.. ___ (
___ ....,.. ___ _
FllE .• -.L .. _. •• ( C )
LmER ········-·· ..
>JC __ TKLR ••••
\. ---
FILE ·-·-·····-··
L!nER ···········-·
A/C ••• .TKLR ••••
(d)
f ILE ···-··-······-·
LETTER ••••••••..•. ( e)
A/C .... TICLR ••••
I
Consideration of Resolution No. 74-128, accepting
Digesters "N" and "O" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-21,
as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of
Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement.
See page "D"
Consideration of motion to receive and file bid
tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase
of Three (3) 4-Wheel Electric Cars, Specification
No. A-072, to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company in
the amount of $5,855.17. See page "E"
Consideration of Resolution No. 74-129, providing for
change of Mechanic !I's position ($811-$1001) to
Maintenance Mechanic II classification ($790-$975),
and transferring said position from the Mechanical
Division to the Plant Maintenance Division. See
page "F"
Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress
report on Treatment Plant Construction Projects. See
page "G"
-· --.... D"""'!STRICT 2
( f)
\__ FILE -~---~--/ -t,,L \/
LETI'ER ...b.--·-
A/C .••. TKLl ••••
( g)
FILE-·-·-·
Lm'ER--··
A/C .... na.R ···•
FILE •.•. :;:: •...••••••
LETTER ••••• ~ •.•••.••
~ AJ..C~ 7il'kl:~, ··~
< ~,:>-'.·~~-:_:;;·
' -·-··-
( h)
. (i)
FILE ······-··--
1.mER~~::'JI
A/C ._TICLR -
Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal
submitted by Lowry & Associates, dated October 10, 1974,
for design of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reach 3,
authorizing design of said interceptor from La Palma
Avenue to Imperial; and authorizing the General Manager
to direct the engineer to proceed with design from Imperial
to the Orange County line upon receipt of concept approval
from SWRCB and EPA, for a net total lump sum fee of
$408,500. See page "H"
Consideration of motion approving the following Change
Orders to the plans and specifications for the Santa
Ana River Interceptor from Katella Avenue to La Palma
Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-2, and authorizing changes
to the contract with Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods &
Sons, Inc. A Joint Venture, as follows:
Change Order No. 3 -Addition of $4, 488. 75 for u,nanticipated
work re utilities location and
time extension therefor of 4 calendar
days. See page "I"
Change Order No. 4 -Addition of $20,500.00 for
additional jacked casing pipe and
riprap due to Flood Control District
activities and time extension
therefor of 10 calendar days.
See page "J"
Consideration of Resolution No. 74-132~2, authorizing
execution of Pipe Line License Agreement with the Atchison,
Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for right of way in
connection with construct-ton of the Palm Drive Interceptor
Sewer, Contract No:~~1, See pae;e "K"
.J -/ '7-;;l ( ? )
Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 74-133-2,
authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately
7 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of
Mohler Drive (Proposed Annexation No. 11 -Tract No. 8713
to County Sanitation District No. 2)
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
~
(10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
DISTRICT 2 (Continued)
FILE •.. --·--
LETTER ·······-···-
A/C •• -TKlR ·-·
Consideration of motion to receive and file staff
progress report on construction of the Santa Ana River
Interceptor from Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue,
Contract No. 2-14-2. See page "L"
DISTRICT 3
FILE ···-··-······-
LETTER ···-·········
(k) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to
we .. -TKLR -·
---·-(1)
FILE 1 ••••••••••••••••••
LETTER -~·l'.:f.~~~
we _.TKLR •••.
(m)
FILE ••••••..•..•....•.
@i.t' ~ .. ±-:::::: ..
A/C _TKl.R ....
(n)
i, FILE ¥-:·-··-·
-------~-\~'.!\·-:"·,j,,.
~TTER .~··---~-'
:;vc-: .. TKLR -
the plans and specifications for the Knott Interceptor,
Reaches 5 & 6, Contract No. 3-20-1
Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 74-134-3
to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation
and awarding contract for the Knott Interceptor,
Reaches 5 & 6, Contract No. 3-20-1 to Sully-Miller
Contracting Company, in the amount of $4,602,992.00
See page "M"
Consideration of motion to receive and file Application
to Proceed in Forma Pauperis With Relief From Filing
Security for Costs, Points and Authorities in Support
Thereof, and Affidavits of Plaintiffs John Inks, John
Sherrod and Steve Dale Johnson; and Notice and Motion
to Proceed in Forma Pauperis With Relief From Filing
Security for Costs, Case No. 214450, in connection with
construction of the Bolsa Relief Trunk Sewer (Reach 10)
and Bolsa Avenue Storm Drain, Contract No. 3-17-1; and
refer to General Counsel and liability insurance carrier
for appropriate action
Consideration of Resolution No. 74-139-3, authorizing
execution of an agreement for acquisition from the State
of California of approximately 1,200 sq. ft. of property
located in the vicinity of Westminster Avenue and the
/\~~I'll-. ~ -t,r~p •'
~. \:
San Diego Freeway, in connection with construction of
Westside Interceptor Facilities, Westminster Avenue Inter-
ceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-14 (Revised), for the amount
of $100.00. See page "N"
f ILE ·--···-·····-
lET'TfR ·······-···-
WC __ .na.R -
------··-.........................
( o) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress
report on construction of the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4,
Contract No. 3-18. See page "O"
DISTRICT 7
: FU.E !::~·I!·::·"···· ( p) ------~~ 1.mn~.L~ .. E . ..V
wr::. .... neut .. "
-
. FILE .~::.p·c:e
-&.Emlt~.~-~-:~.~
A/C ••.• TKLR --
(q)
we .... TKLR ··-
-~~--: ---·-;..;
Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 74-135-7,
authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately
23.48 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity
of Skyline Drive and Plantero Drive (Proposed Annexation
No. 42 -Tract No. 8640 to County Sanitation District No. 7)
Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 74-136-7,
authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately
3/4 acre of territory to the District in the vicinity of
Cowan Heights Drive (Proposed Annexation No. 43 -Guzman
Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7)
Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 74-137-7
authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately
1 acre of territory to the District in the vicinity of
Cowan Heights Drive and Sirrine Drive (Proposed Annexation
No. 44 -Ursino Annexation to County Sanitation District
No. 7)
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5)
-4-
(10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4 )
DISTRICT 11
F1LE ···········-··-· ( s) ( 1) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff
LETIER .. ·-·······-report, dated October 10, 1974, re Annexation No. 18 -
A/c ..•. TKLR ·-· Bolsa Lease Annexation to County Sanitation District
No. 11. See page "P"
FI LE ·-····----~ • f~. P1-~TTER ············-
A/C .•.. TKLR -·
\.
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 74 -138-11, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 44 .19
acres of territory in the vicinity of Ellis Avenue
extended westerly of Edwards Street (Proposed
Annexation No. 1 8 -Bo l sa Lease Annexation to County
Sanitation District No. 1 1), said annexation to be
subject to payment of fees established by the Board
following a review of the District's annexation policy .
FILE··---See page "Q"
LETIE~ _/. (..3) ~~dcp ~ .v---
Consideration of motion directing the staff to
evaluate the District's existing annexation policy
and fee schedule and report back to the Board
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
(12) (a) DISTRICTS 1,3,5,6,7 & 11
@ )50.:(l.)
>JC .•.. TKLR .••. ~
~\-
Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from
Chino Basin Municipal Water District, dated February 13,
1974, requesting assignment of agreement for Wastewater
Interceptor Capacity and Wastewater Treatment and Disposal
Capacity. See page "R"
(b) DISTRICTS 1, 3 ,5 , 6, 7 & 11
Fii f\f\ l>
LmER -··········"Roll Call Vote or Cast
Unanimous Ballot
A/C ._.TKLlt •. ::
Consideration of Resolution No. 74 -13b, approving
assignment by .District No. 2 of Chino Basin Municipal
Water District Waste Water Interceptor Capacity
Agreement to the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority,
in form approved by the General Counsel . See page "S" ---····-·-·
-----~
(c) ALL DISTRICTS
FILE ···········-·····
LmER ···-··-····· IY\ ~_5
A/C •.•• TKLR ·-· .Roll Call Vote or Cast
---·--Unani mous Ba llot
FILE ···-·-···· •
Consideration of Reso l ution No . 74-131, approving
assignment of Chino Basin Municipal Water District
Treatment and Disposal Agreement to the Santa Ana
Watershed Project Authority, in form approved by the
General Counsel. See page "T "
UTTER •....•.•...••
,......, 8'. 19 -q:a-D l~~ ~
ALL DISTRICTS C: A ~ ~r~~Q.)
Report of General Counsel re a cquisition of property immediately
adjacent to Treatment Plant No. 2 A/C ._TKLR ••••
(14) ALL DISTR I CTS
FILE ······1forrcan v~ ~ 6.st
UTTER ·-·-{lflMlimous Ballot
A/C •••• TKlR ••••
Consideration of Resolution No. 74 -140, amending rules and
regulations relative to conditions of employment, Resolution
No. 70-3, as amended, regarding overtime definition. See
page "U"
(15) ALL DISTRICTS
.Consideration of motion to receive and file certification of
the General Manager that he has checke d all bills appearing
on the agenda , found them to be in order, and that he
recommends authorization for payment
!OLL CP._L vorr .. ......Jl.6) ALL DISTRICTS
(16) Consideration of roll call vot e motion approving Joint
Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant
books for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1 ,
and authorizing payment of claims listed on page "I"
ITEMS ON
SUPPU:MENTAL AGENDA
-5-
(17) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items
~) Consideration of request to substitute engine and bl.ower ~ assembly subcontractor re 46 MGD Activated Sludge
ITEMS ON
SUl'PlEMENTAL AGENDA
Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-16:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file the
FILED ... ~ •.•....... following:
LffiER~.1
(a) A/C ·--TKLR -·· Letter from Donovan Construction Company,
Contractor for Job No. Pl-16, dated September 18,
1974, re listed subcontractor, Delaval, Engine and
FILE t> .• Y. ...... -.•.•• f V\.\
LETTER ·······-····· )
A/C ••.• TKLR ••••
FILE:> .•. ~---·····
LETTER -·--···-
A/C -.• TKLR ••.•
FILE -(t~::.·~
LffiER .-··-·---
A/C .... TKLR ••••
( 2)
(b)
(c)
Compressor Division. See page "IV"
Letter from Delaval, Engine and Compressor
Division, dated September 26, 1974, acknowledgin g
that they are unable to enter into a subcontract
with Donovan Construction Company for supplying
engine and blower assembly for said contract.
See page "V"
Staff Memorandum, dated October 15, 1974,
recommending approval of the request for delisting
of Delaval as a subcontractor for said contract
and assigning the responsibility to Donovan
Construction Company. See page "VI"
Consideration of motion approving the request o f
Donovan Construction Company for substitution o f
anothe r person(s) or firm(s), including Donovan
Construction Company, for the engine and blowe r
assembly work for 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment
at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-16, ,in accordanc e
with Section 4107.5 of the Government Code, with the
understanding that there is no change in the specifi-
cation or contract requirements.
r-~
( (17-B)) Consideration of bids for Additional Pumping Facilities ~ at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-1:
ITEMS ON
SUPPt.Etft~T ~LAG.WO .A.
:!: .. ~~~~--:~PA b
(1)
-·-···-·--( 2)
A/C •••• TKLR .•••
Consideration of motion to receive and file staff
memorandum, dated October 15, 1974, re evaluation of
said bids. See page "VII"
Consideration of Resolution No. 74-141, to receive and
file bid tabulation, rejecting all bids for Additional
Pumping Facilities at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station,
Job No. J-6-1, and directing that said work be accom-
plished by force account, pursuant to Section 4755 of
the Health and Safety Code; and authorizing the staff
to negotiate for purchase of proprietary equipment.
("Section 4755 ..... If all bids are rejected, the
district board on a resolution adopted by a four-fifth s
vote may declare that the work can b e performe d mor e
e conomically by day labor, or the materials or s uppli es
furnished at a lowe r pric e in the open market and may
have the work done in a manne r stated in the resolution
in order to take advantage of this lower cost" ..... )
See pages "VIII" and "IX"
-6-
(18) DID~HIO~B 1 & 7
Oon~ideratioa of motioa appPoviRg sl::lsperrne fl:lHd warraHto,
if m1y. See snpplemental agenda attaefimcfi~
( 19) DISTRICT 1
(20)
( 21)
mMS OH ( 22)
SUP PLEMENTA L AG /4 s
Con~ideratiofi of motioa approviag warraato, if aHy.
See su~~lcmcatal agcHaa attaehment
DISTRICT~~ _
O~her bl!P~ness ~~ or supplemental agenda
it ~f any
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn q: I~
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion approving warrants.
See page "II"
DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items:
.~~~DA Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 74-142-2, approving
~·~ · plans and specifications for Carbon Ca nyon -Palm Drive
ct-:=.~ .... Interceptor Sewer, Reach 2 , from Carbon Canyon Channel to
~········· Kraemer Bou l evard, Contract No . 2-17 -2; and authorizin g
-··ftt-r ···::.-=-=--·~ advertising for: bids on November 21, 1974 :E~~·:c~24 )(_ ~; ~~
~~ Consideration of motion to adjourn C(. I~
lli"& Q~I ~ )
SUPPLEMENTAL AGifA5 DISTRICT
motion approving suspense fund warrants .
ITEMS ON ( 26) DISTRIO 5:::/
suPPLEMENTAL AGENDA Conside ti on of motion approving suspense fund warrants .
See page "II"
(21\J DISTRIITT ~·------
. °"-=Gther bus :trfess and-C ommunications or supplemental agenda
(28)
(30)
(31)
(32)
ITEMS ON
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENOA
IV\\ S.
(33)
(34)
items, if any
DISTRICT 5 ' I Consideration of motion to adjourn <?", o--u c.( vv---:=:rN.. lfJ ,g Ct n ~)
DIS':PRIC':P 6
Co11side!ation of motiem ariprovin~ warrant~, if a~31.
See s ttpplernental a~efie1a attaefiHlcRt
DISTRICT 6 Othe !/'ou~nd communfCa:Mon_s_o.r supplemental agenda
ite s, ir-~~Y~ ~
DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn q: l'1
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion approvi ng warrants .
See page "III"
DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
i t ·ems, if any
DISTRICT 7
Cons ideration of motion to·.adjourn ~·. \i
35) DISTRICT ~
Other ifusiness a~n~S--S-I!_S_Upplemental agenda ~~terns, if any
-7-
~lb (38 )
IT EM S ON ( 38)
SUPP LEMENTAL AGE~DA
(39 )
DIS9?HIC'!PS 3 i. lJ
6eHsi 6:erat;ieH e f metieR af)f)PeviRS s w.s f)e Rse f1:1Ra uaFFB:Hto ,
if any . See sw.pplemontal a g enaa attaefiment
DI STRICT 11
consideration of motion approving warrants.
"III"
ons or suppleme ntal a genda
(40 ) DI STRI CT 1 1
Co nsi d e r ation o f motion to a d journ C): /1
C-
('(41',) DI STRI CT 3 ~ En g ineer 's status re p ort re Ma st er Pl a n facilit i es
::,;-~~ DI S TRI CT 3
Ne ·--TKl.R ..... Report of en gin e ers o n r equ ests o f the Ci ty o f Bu ena Park
.......
(4 4 )
a n d t h e City o f Cyp r ess r e q u estin g modificat i on of District's
Master P l an of Trunk Sew e r s
DIS TRI CT 3
Co n s i de r ation of mo t i on aut hori zing the General Manager to
r equ est a proposal f rom Bo y l e En gine erin g Co r por at i on for
des i g n of the Westminster Re lief Inter ceptor, Reaches 25
t hro u gh 29
DISTRICT 3
l"TEMS O N ( 44)
SU Pl'l.U.'>!:NTA L AGENDA N\ \5 Consideration of motion approving warrants.
See page "II"
( 45) . DISTRTCT 3
(45)
ITEMS O N
SUPP LEMENTA L AGEN DA
FILE ·-·-·-·-·-\ s Lem ~ .. k-::::::.. \{\'e
A/C -.• TKLR -
(46)
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items :
Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and
Cross-Complaint for Declaratory Relief, Case No. 214450,
Jonn Inks , et al. vs. State of California, et al., and
McGuire Construction, Inc. vs. State of California, et al.,
relative to construction of the Bolsa Relief Trunk Sewer
(Reach 10) and Bolsa Avenue Storm Drain, Contract No. 3-17-1;
and refer to General Couns e l and liability insurance carrier
for appropriate action
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn ~:31
-8-
. ' II ~-.. BOARDS OF DHlECTORS
I County Sanitation Districts .
II
Post Office Box 8127
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
JOINT BOARDS
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS
OCTOBER 16, 1974 -7:30 P.M.
ALL DISTRICTS
Area Code 7 14
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
(16) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint
Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant
books for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1,
and authorizing payment of claims listed on page ''I"
(17-A) Consideration of request to substitute engine and blower
assembly subcontractor re 46 MGD Activated Sludge
Treatment .at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-16:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file the
follo wing:
(a) Letter from Donovan Construction Company,
Contractor for Job No. Pl-16, dated September 18,
1974, r e listed subcontractor, Delaval, Engine and
Compressor Division. See page "IV"
(b) Letter from Delaval, Engine and Compressor
Division, dated September 26, 1974, acknowledging
that they are unable to enter into a subcontract
with Donovan Construction Company for supplying
engine and blower assembly for said job.
See page "V"
(d) Staff Memorandum, dat~d October 15, 1974,
recommending approva l of the request for delisting
of Delaval as a subcontractor for said contract
and assigning the responsibility to Donovan
Construction Company . See page "VI"
(2) Consideration of motion approving the request of
Donovan Construction Company for substitution of
another person(s) or firm(s), including Donovan
Construction Company , for the engine and blower
assembly work f o r 46 MGD .Activated Sludge Treatment
at Reclamation Plant . No. 1, Job No. Pl-16, in accordance
with Section 410].5 of the Government Code, with the
un ders t anding that th ere i s no chan g e in the specifi-
cation or contract requirements.
ALL DI ST RI CTS (C o ntin ued)
(17-B) Consideration of bids for Additional Pump i ng Fac i l i ties
at Oc ean Outfall Pum p ing St a tion, J ob No. J-6-1:
(1)
(2)
Consideration of motion to receive and file staff
mem o randum, dated October 15, 1974, re evaluation o f
said bid s. Se e page "VII"
Con s id e r a ti on o f Re solution No . 7~-141, to receive and
fil e bid tabul a t i o n, r ejec ting a ll bids f o r Addi tional
Pumping Facilities at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station ,
Job No. J -6-1, and dire cting that said work be acc om-
plished by force account , pursuant to Section 4755 of
the Healt h and Saf e ty Co de; a n d authorizing the st a ff
to negotiate for purchase of proprietary ~quipment .
("-Section 4755 ..... If a l l bids are rejected, the
district bo a rd o n a resolution adopted by a four -fifths
vote may declare that the work can be performed mo re
econ omically b y day l abor, or the ma t erials or supplie s
furni s hed at a lowe r price in the open market and may
have the work do n e in a manner stated in the reso l u tion
in order t o t a k e a d v a n tage of this lower cost" ..... )
See pages "VIII" and "IX"
DI STRICT 2
(2 2) Consideration of motion app r oving warrants .
See page "II"
(23 ) Consideratio n of St andard Resolution No. 74-1 42-2,-approving
p l ans and specificat i ons for Carbon Canyon -Palm Drive
Interceptor Sewer, Reach 2, from Carbon Canyon Channel t o
Kraemer Boulevard , Contract No. 2-1 7 -2; and authorizin g
advertis i n g f or bid s on November 21, 1974
DISTRICT S 5 & 6
(25) Considerati on of mo tion approving suspense fund warrants .
See page "II"
DISTRICT 5
(26) Con s iderati on of motion approving warrants .
See pag e "II"
DISTRICT 7
(32) Con s idera t ion o f mo t ion ap p r o v~ng wa rrants .
See page "III"
DISTRI CT 11
(38) Con sidera t i on o f mo tion appr oving warrant s .
See p a ge "I II"
DISTRI CT 3
(44) Con s i deratio n o f mot i on a ppro ving warrants.
Se e p age "II"
(45) Conside r a tion o f mo tion to r e c e ive and file Summons and
Cross -Co mp l a int fo r Decla ra tory Re lief, Ca s e No . 2144 50 ,
John Inks , et al . vs . Stat e of Cal iforni a , et al ., and
McGuir e Co nst r u ction, Inc. v s . State of Califor n i a , e t a l .,
rel a ti ve to const r uc t ion of th e Bol sa Re lief Tr unk Sewer
(R ea c h 1 0) and Bo l sa Av enue Storm Dr ain , Con t ract No . 3-17-1 ;
and refer to Ge ne r a l Couns e l and li ab il i t y ins u r anc e carri e r
f or appropriate act i on ·
-2 -
WARP\.4~ NT NO.
23962
239-53
23964
?~":1bt:; sr~ ~./')8
23967
23958
23969
2397J
23971
23972
23973
23974
23975
23976
23977
23978
23979
23980
23981
23982
23983
23984.
23985
23986
23987
23988
23989
21990
-.,...(99.1
cj992
23993
23994
23995
23996
23997
23998
23999
2l.!OOO
24001
24002
2~00-3·
24~04
24005
24006
24007
24008
24009
24010
24011
24012
24013
24014
24015
·;:)16
~017
24018
2~019
24020
21-J ·021
24J22
2l1023
24024
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Abbey Rents, Equipment Rental $
Air California, Air Fare
Air C~nditioning Supply Co., Freight
All Bearing Service, Inc., C~uplin~s, Equipment Parts
Allied Power Sweeping, Paving Maintenance
A:rierican Compressor Co~pany, 8ompress,::ir Repair
American Lock and Supply, Inc., Hardware
Anaheim Sewer Construction, Lateral Repair
City of Anaheim, Power
Anaheim Truck and Transfer Co., Freight
Analytical Measurements, Test Equipment
The Anchor Packing Company, Gaskets
Baker Equipment Rentals, Equipment Rental
Bank of America, Bond and Coupon Collection
Banning Battery Company, Batteries
Barnes & Delaney, Coupling and Belting
Beckn~ri Instru~ents, Inc., Test Equipment
Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair
Bender Machine, Inc., Pump Repair
Bennett Pump Company, Pumps
Bessen and Associates, Pump Parts M.0.11-14-73 & 6-12-74
Bishop Graphics, Drafting Supplies ·
Blower Paper Company, Paper Supplies
Bomar Magneto Servic, Inc., Magneto Repair
Bris~ol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams
Broadlick Art Supply, Drafting Supplies
Burners and Controls, Inc., Controls
CS Company, Valyes and Freight .
Cal's Cameras, Photo Supplies and Processing
California Collator Sales, Binding Supplies
John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Serv. -I.W. Ordinance
Champion Trophies, Facilities Tour Supplies
Chemtech Industries, Inc., Jan~torial Supplies
Coast Insurance Agency, Liability Insurance Premium
William N. Clarke, WPCF Conference Expense
College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials
Commercial & C.B. Communications, Comnmnication Equip.
Compressor Service Co., Compressor Parts
Connell Chevrolet, Truck Repair
Consolidated Electric Distr., Electric Supplies
Constructors Supply Company, Hardware and Tools
Control Specialists, Inc., Compressor Parts
Copeland Motors, Inc., Truck Parts
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
County of Orang~, Tax Roll Extract Piogram
Crane Packing CJmpany, Seals
Crest Leasing Corp., Vehicle Lease
Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplies
Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies
Clarence S. Curnrnings, Employee Mileage
Daniels Tire Service, Truck Tires
DeGuelle & Sons Glass Company, Furniture Repair
Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling
Dow Chemical Company, Chemicals
The Drawing ~oard, Inc., Office.Supplies
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies.
Enchanter~ Inc., ocean Monitoring
En·,.ineers · Sales~Service Co. . Inc., Pump Parts 0 .
Enterprise Printing Co., Printing
FMC Croporati0n. Shaker Parts
Foss Company, Foam System
Hilliam Fox, -E:~:ployce Mileage
Fischer and Porter Co., Metering Supplies & Chlor. Parts
I-1
AMOUNT
166.oo
52.50
24.61
220.99
37J.5J
140.00
296.95
145.C>O
89.84
·97.74
41.82
26.08
95.0C>
188.65
345 .14
1,600.97
171.72
28.00
488.40 l; 302·.so
13,314.02
43.75
333.53
196.58
91.00
70.08
30.03
l", 757 .17
676.31
538.28
2,223.14
25.44
364.64
2,549.00
84.85
133.66
38.16
847.78
177.14
1,655.05
2,078.96
353.15
21.67
3B4.65
588.10
136.16
147.28
40.00
2,273.68
72.18
319. 46
40.36
240.00
1, 688. 4 3
22. L18
343 .06
3,000.00
122.96
110.29
211~. 74
48.76
36.90
6,272.01
iARRANT NO.
24025
24026
24027
24028
24029
24030
24031
24032
24033
24034
24035
24036
24037
24038
24039
24040
24041
24042
24043
24044
24045
24c:>46
24047
24048
24049
24050
24051
24052
24053
24054
24055
24056
24057
24058
24059
24060
24061
24062
24063
24064
24065
24066
24067
24068
24069
24070
24071
24072
24073
24074
24075
24076
24077
24078
24079
24080
24081
24082
24083
24084
24085
24086
24087
24088
IN FAVOR OF
Foxboro ·company, Controls $
France Products, C0mpress~r Repair
Freeway Machine and Welding, Machining
City of Fullerton, Water
Garden Grove Lumber & Cement, Building Materials
General Electric, Electric Supplies
General Telephone c.:impany of Calif.
Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine, Contract 1-1-73
Gilsabind Comapny, Seal Coating
Golden State Machinery Co., Inc., Equipment Parts
Goldenwest Fertilizer Co., Grit Removal
Graybar Electric Co., Inc., Electric Supplies
Hardware Systems, La.b Supplies
Harman Pump Co., Freight
Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting & COD Expenses
Harrington Industrial Plastics, Piping Supplies
Haul Away Containers, Trash Disposal
Hendricks GMC Trucks, Inc., Truck Parts
Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease
Hi-Fi Banner Co., Signs
Hoffmann's Nason Paint Store, Truck Paint
Honeywell, Inc., Metering Supplies
Howard Supply Co., Pipe, Pipe Supplies & Valves
City of Huntington Beach, Water
Huntington Beach Equipment Rentals, Equipment Rental
Hydro Clean, Inc., Hydro Blasting
Inland Nut and Bolt Co., Hardware & Freight._
Irvine Ranch Water District, Water
Keen-Kut Abrasive Company, Tools
Keenan Pipe and Supply Co., Pipe Supplies
King Bearing, Inc., Bearings & Seals
Kirst Pump and Machine Works, Pump
Kleen-Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies
Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware
L & N Uniform, Uniform Service
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Hardware & Tools
Lakewood Pipe Service, Inc., Pipe Supplies
Larry's Building Materials, Inc., Building Materials
Lavender Fastener Company, Hardware
Judy Lee, Employee Mileage
Lewco Electric Co., Equipment Parts
R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., Paving Materials
McCoy Ford Tractor, Tractor Parts
John McCullough, Employee Mileage
McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Bushings & Hardware
Majestic Fasteners Co., Hardware
Mar Vac Electronics, Tools
Master Blueprint & Supply Co., Drafting Supplies
Metal Finis:t..ers F·::mnda ti on, Technical Manual
Milo Equipment Co., Towing Charges
Moore Products Co., Controls _
Morgan Equip~ent Company, Equipment Parts
.Morrison Corr:pany, Valve
Jean Mosher, Employee Mileage
Motorola, Inc., Cornmunica tion Supplies
Nakase Brothers, Landscape Supplies
National Chemsearch, Cleaners
National· Lumber and Supply, Inc., Bldg. Mat'ls & Hardware
Neptune Microfloc, Inc., JPL Test Material
City :Jf !Je~·rport Beac:1, ~·Ia ter
Newport Skyways, Charter Service Re: Ecological Survey
C. Arthur Nisson, Gen'l. Counsel Retainer & Qtrly Fees
Oakite Products, Inc., Cleaner
Occidental C~llege, Ecology Trawl
I-2
AMOUNT
1,057.45
L812.98
'242.74
5.41
315.62
642.2R
3,885.~
9, 341. 57
8,797.50
59.23
3,426.00
204.71
189. 48
6.91
335.57
301.33
280.00
159.02
567.62
88.53
172.36
209.60
2,929.64
9.10
234.24
1,898.31
l,5e9.91
3.50
263.30
2,478.61
330.7~
808. 7"-if
. 659.4q
313.05
2,987.27
1,054.05
243.06
53.93
131.99
41. 70
36.04
68.90
263.26
26.10
285.34
569.73
42.40
239.37
5.25
66.oo
31.48
388.52
986.44
19.80
136. 4 3
1,657.54
830. 7~
248.\9b
403.14
. 5.00
48.oo
i,006.2s
'123.60
400.00
WARRANT· NO.
24089
2lt090
24091
24092
24093
0 4094
'-"095 24096
24097
24098
24099
24100
24101
24102
24103
24104
24105
24106
24107
24108
24109
24110
24111
24112
24113
24114
24115
24116
24117
24118
'?4119
~120
24121
24122
24123
24124
24125
24126
24127
24128
24129
24130
24131
24132
24133
24134
24135
24136
24137
2ll 138
24139
24140
24141
24142
24143
~4144
~4145.
24146
24147
24148
24149
24158
24151
24152
24153
IN FAVOR OF
Orange County Stamp Co., Drafting Supplies
Osterbauer Con:press:ir Service~ Tools
Pacific Coast Glass Co., Vehicle Repair
Pacific Telephone
M. C. Patten and Co., Inc., Gauges
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Co., EDP Review M.O. 4-10-74·
J. N. Pena Janitorial Ser.vice, Right-of-Way Maintenance
Perkin Elmer, Lab Supplies
Tom Pesich, Employee Mileage
Poly Fabrics, Sheeting
Postmaster, Postage
Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal
Bernard T. Redican, .Employee Mileage
The Register, Employment Ad
The Republic Supply Co., Valves
Republic Engines, Equipment Parts
Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Metal
Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts
Routh Transportation, Oil Removal
Ruff's Saw Service, Equipment Repair
SGA Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies
San Bar Tropical Fish, Ecology Supplies
Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing
Santa Ana Book Store, Inc., Drafting Supplies
City of Santa Ana, Right-of-Way Maintenance
Sargent Welch Scientific, Lab Supplies
Scientific Products, Lab Supplies
City of Seal Beach, Water
Security Industrial Supply, Pipe Supplies
The Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies
John Sigler, Employee Mileage
Fred Sinasek, .Employee Mileage
Singer Business Machines, Maintenance Agreement
Smart and Final Iris ·co., Bags
So-Cal Sign Company, Signs
South Orange Supply, Pipe Supplies
Southern California Edison Co.
Southern California Gas Co.
Southern California Water Co.
Southwest Flexible Co., Hose
Sout~west Processors, Inc., Oil Removal
Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp. Bottled Water
Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Standard Concrete Material, Concrete
Standard Oil Co., of Calif., Gasoline, Oil & Diesel Fuel
Starow Steel, Steel .
Sterling Art & Engineering, Drafting Supplies
Sunnen Products Co., Equipment Parts
Sweetland Cmnpany, Pump Parts
J. Wayne Sylvester, WPCF Conference Expense
T.B.S. Contracting, Inc.J Paving Repair
Taylor-Dunn, Equipment Parts
Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage.
Taylor Bus Service, Facilities Tour Transportation
Tektonix, Inc., Equipment Repair
John D. Thomas, WPCF Conference Expense
C. o. Thompson Petroleum Co., Kerosene
Three M B.P.S.I., Reproduction Repairs
Tiernan's Office Equipment, Adder Repairs
Tony's Lock & Safe Service, Tools u. s. Equipment Co., Inc., Compressor Parts
Union Oil C~., of Calif., Gasoline
United Auto Parts, Truck Parts
United Parcel Service, Freight Out
Utilities Supply Co., Tools
I-3
AMOUNT
64.68
29.88
137.51
458.04
628.47
2,344.oo
25J.0J
70.06
9.9J
276.41
500.00
60.00
93.06
220.20
1,796.02
8.24
475.37
711.32
1,866.29
32.99
376.05
119.57
84.95
7.95
30.00
226.86
39.64
34.88
. 342.33
2,103.56
39.00
35.58
55.00
24.27
501.90
. 365.02
58,293.80
570.21
3.00
1,469.19
1, 124. 30
115.33
120.72
271.87
2,72J.89
305.15
8. 34
I 13 • 04
·26 .80
95.42
3,862.57
117.37
85.35
210.00
72.12
121.77
227.18
52.12
17.50
28.02·
116.97
5,-. ~,.
( • \,.J\ .. )
281. 78
45.92
579.38
fARRANT NO.
--···--··-·-
24154
24155
24156
24157
24158
24159
24160
24161
24162
24163
24164
24165
24166
24167
24168
24169
24170
24171
24172
24173
24174
24175
24176
24177
24178
24179
24180
24181
24182
24183
24184
24185
24186
24187
24188
24189
2LJ190
21.J 191
24192
24193
24194
IN FAVOR OF
·Valvate Associates, Valves $
Van Waters and Rogers, Odor Control Chemicals
Jann Waples R.S., Odor Consultant
Water Pollution Control Federation, Workshop
Registration M.O. 9-11-74
. ;
AMOUNT
652.06
1,725.75
224.10
45.00·
36.87
750. ,".
51.~
Waukesha Engj_ne Servicenter, Inc., Enr;ine Parts
White, Fine and Ambrogne, Professional Services
Russell Wold, Employee Mileage
World Travel Bureau, Inc., Air Fare, JPL Grant M.O. 6-12-74
& WPCF Conference M.O. 9-11-74
Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage
Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Services & Supplies
George YardleF Associates, Filter
Zodiac Paper, Reproduction Supplies
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services
Cheesrnan's Bench Rack Co., Shop Equipment
Leroy Crandall & Associates, Consultant Pl-16
Daily Pilot, Bid Notice A-072 & E-072
Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16
E.T.I. & Kordick, Contractor I-8-3
Electronic Business Machines, Calculator
Ficker Architects, Architect Service J-13
Hemisphere Constructors, Contractor P2-21
Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Mgmt. Pl-16
H0ward Supply Co., Hose
Hydro Products, Water Sampler
LBWS, Inc., Cabinets & Generator
McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Milling Machine
Manning Enviromental Corp., Flowmeter
Masterson Scaffold Co., Scaffold Rental M. O. 6-12-74 ·
Orange County Equipment Co., Tools
Pacific Engineers, Contractor I-4-R
Perkin Elmer Corp., Lab Equipment
Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Equipment
Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Equipment
The Shirley Co., Consultant Services J-6-1
Southern Calif. Testing Labs, Soil Testing Pl-16
Stewart Warner Alemite Sales, Wheel Balancer
Testing Engineers, Inc., Testing Pl-16
Utilities Supply Co., Tools
Victor Comptometer Corp., Calculator
Weldex Enterprises, Sphere Inspection M. O. 6-12-74
Richard Cra:ner, Inc., Paint Material .M. O. 6-12-74
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF
I-4
604.58
46.74
1,198.41
47.53
143.85
$ 196,575.86
$ 10,878.21
289.36
2,000.00
20.35
684,588.78
12,900.00
296.70
12,311.50
5,128.38
11-739.0'"'
-324. 7'-'
2., 095 .42
9J6.67
377.00
1,733.35
3,686.00
644.75
10,288.78
3,932.60
3,419.88
380.52
1,500.0J
324.oo
1,395.22
i,o44.oo
330.85
2,cq6.30
1,118.00
Q 6,.. 2,305. b
$ 778' 116 .. J6
$ 974,691.92
~
WARRANT NO.
DISTRICT NO. 2
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
24195
24196
24197
2.-.,-98
24199
24200
24201
?111~02
a..-203
24204
24205
24206
24207·
...,,,
24208
24209
County of Orange, Compaction Test 2-14-2 $
Kasler Corporation & L.H. Woods & Sons, Contractor 2-14-2
Lowry a.nd Associates, Engineering Service 2-17,
42.58
476,658.75
Construction Survey 2-14-2
Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Testing 2-14-2 & 2-18
DISTRICT NO. 3
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Beard Development Company, Refund Overpayment
County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County
Interdistrict Sewer Use
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
8,180.18
3,718.00
$ 488,599.51
$
$
7,123.14
179.00
7:,302.14
Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engr. Serv. 3-20~2 & 3-20-3
Construction Survey 3-18 $
County of Orange; Compaction Test 3-18
16~637.50
354.45
87.70
2,756.00
479,173.00
The Register, Bid Notice 3-20-1
Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Testing 3-18
A.G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N.M. Saliba, Contractor 3-18
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Fred Gallegos; Refund Permit Overpayment
Woodford & Bernard and Pacific Telephone~ Refund Permit
Overpayment
DISTRICT NO. 5
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
City of Newport Beach, Connection Fee Administration
DISTRICTS NOS 5 & 6
SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS
Hewes-Schock, Contractor 5-14-R4
II
$ 499,008.65
250.00
1,710.00
$ 1,960.00
$ 508,270.79
$ 140.25
$
DISTRICT NO. 7
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
24210 Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engr. Serv. 7-6-6 & 7-6-7
DISTRICT NO. 11. ·
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
24211 F. B. Cook Corporation, Contractor ll-10-2R
III
AMOUNT
$ 11,510.10
$ 3,265.93
#
'
WESTERN DIVISION-MAIN OFFICE
1234 EAST NORMANDY PLACE
POST OFFICE BOX 10119 • SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92711
TELEPHONE (714) 543-0171
September 18, 1974
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County, California
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention: Mr. Ray E. Lewis
Chief Engineer
CERTIFIED MAIL
Reference: 46 MGD Activated Sludge Plant at Reclamation Plant No. 1
Job Pl-16
Fountain Valley, California
Subject: Listed Subcontractor -Delaval
Gentlemen:
During the prebidding period for the project, this office was in contact with
a sales representative of Delaval Turbine, Inc. regarding the project. In
the course of discussions, Delaval stated they would only bid to Donovan
Construction Company on the basis that they be named ("listed") if
they were the successful bidder for their section of work. This listing
procedure was a 1 so required by Addendum No. 2, _Page 2, Paragraph #9. In
addition, the.description of on site field labor that is described in this
specification section supports the requirement for 11 listing 11 as Addendum
No. 2 required.
Since Delaval's proposal was conditioned ·on their being listed (if successful),
Donovan Construction Company accepted their bid with that understanding. At
the time of bid, Donovan Construction Company named Delaval as the successful
subcontract bidder. Subsequent to Donovan Construction Company being awarded
the contract by the County Sanitation Districts, a subcontract was prepared and
offered to Delaval. Hcwever, we have now been notified by Delaval that they
cannot enter into a subcontract for this work since they do not have a California
contractor's license. In addition, they now take the position that their bid
was for the furnishing of equipment only. (If this were the case, there would not
have been a requirement for "listing" Delaval at the time of bid.)
Therefore, in accordance with the provisions of ~he California State Code, Section
4107.5 (Subparagraph l; "When the subcontractor listed in the bid after having
had a reasonable opportunity to do so fails or refuses to execute a written
contract, when such written contract, based upon the general terms, conditions,
plans and specifications for the project involved or the terms of such subcontractor 1 s
written bid, is presented to him by the prime contractor" and Subparagraph 6;
-AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER -
AGENDA ITEM #17-A(l)(a) IV-1 ALL DISTRICTS
Mr. Ray E. Lewis -2-September 18, 1974
"When the listed subcontractor is not licensed pursuant to the Contractors
License Law") and pertinent State Contractor's License Law Regulations, Donovan
Construction Company hereby requests pennission for the substitution of another
person(s) or firm(s), including Donovan Construction Company, for the listed
work as specified in Specification Section 63-2 of the contract documents.
Since time is of the essence and with the current uncertainty of manufacturing
and delivery schedules for equipment, we respectfully request that the
proceedings relating hereto be conducted as soon as possible.
Very truly yours,
DONOVAN CPNSTR. UC.T ION CO~PAN_; /~----·_..,, .
..-c-/ ·-~Cc // 4/ L ona 1 d • Kuehnert.. · · '
Administrative Assistant
cc: Delaval -Oakland and Los Angeles
Mr. John McCormick
~. , ..
AGENDA ITEM #17-A(l)(a) IV-2 ALL DISTRICTS
.. : '• ·."
September 26, 1974
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County, California
P. O·. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California
Attention: Mr. R. E. Lewis
Subject:
Gentlemen;
Chief Engineer
Donovan Construction Company Job #7401
46 MGD Activated Sludge
Plant at Reclamation Plant #1
Fountain Valley, California
Job #Pl-16
ENGINE ANO
COMPRESSOR DIVISION
550 85TH AVENUE
P.O. BOX 2161
OAKLAND. CA 94621
PHONE 415 638-0130
Donovan Construction Company wrote to you on September 18, 1974
requesting that you approve the subsitution of another-person (s)
or finn (s) including Donovan Construction Company for the listed
work as specified in Section 63-2 of your contract documents.
We would like to confirm that we agree that we are unable to accept
the sub contract agreement (#7401-57) as presented by Donovan Construc-
tion Company because of its non confonnance with our proposal .
. We submitted our quotation for the equipment described in Section 63-2
of your specifications, to nine different competing contractors. It
was clearly our intent in this quotation to furnish equipment o·nly and
to be designated as the "prime supplier". While we recognized that
the contract Addendum #2 Page 2 indicated that the prime supplier may
qualify as a sub contractor we did not feel that the scope of war~
proposed by our bid would qualify us as a sub contractor. We were
most anxious to avoid the necessity of re-bidding the engine and blower
equipment after the award of your contract, therefore, we specifically
asked that we be named as the "prime supplier". Our ignorance regarding
the lack of contractual allowance for the 11 listing 11 of a prime supplier
not withstanding, we never requested that we be listed as a sub contractor,
or that we would not bid unless we were so listed. Accordingly our pricing
to each of the contractors was based on an "equipment only 11 purchase order.
OELAVAL TURBINE INC.
AGENDA ITEM #17-A(l)(b) V-1 ALL DISTRICTS
Mr. R. E. Lewis
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County, California
September 26, 1974
Page 2
We are not presently a licensed contractor in the state of California
and we do not intend to pursue such a license since our business does
not require such licensing.
We made an effort to negotiate the basic differences (taxes and sub
contractor responsibilities) between our bid intent and Donovan's
interpretation, but have been unsuccessful. Our final offer agreed
to allow Donovan to purchase the blower equipment direct (pending
the counties approval) from Dresser Industries, Inc. This would
provide for the elimination of our mark-up on that equipment and
would reduce the total tax exposure on the job. This agreement
coupled with an additional discount on the engine and accessories
placed the job in a favorable position relative to our. original
bid price. However, we were then made aware of the fact that
further interpretation problems existed. We did not include any
installation of the engine and blower in our bid (the only except-
ion being 63-2 Page 63-4 -Installation of the motor and blower
controls and instrumentation) however, Donovan interpreted the bid
price to include all installation. This is totally outside the scope
of work intented by our bid and we have been unable to reach a mutually
acceptable agreement on these matters with Donovan.
We feel that we have done all possible to reach an agreement and regret
that we will be unable to participate in this contract. Hopefully, a
satisfactory agreement can be made with an alternate supplier to enable
you to satisfy your requirements.
We greatly appreciate the .opportunity offered to us in this project and
hope tnat our inability to reach an agreement with Donovan will not
adversely affect the outcome of this project or our future relationship
with your offices.
Very truly yours,
DELAVAL TURBINE, INC.
Engine and Compressor Division
?1::.:::---
cc: Donovan Construction Company
AGENDA ITEM #17-A(l)(b) V-2 ALL DISTRICTS
H E H 0 R A N D U M
October 15, 1974
TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager
FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
10844' ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71.t) 54'0·2910
(71.t) 962·2"4 l l
SUBJECT: Subcontractor Listing on Job No. Pl-16 -46 MGD Activated
Sludge Plant Additions at Reclamation Plant No. 1
At the time Donovan Construction Company, the contractor for the
$30 million, 46-MGD Activated Sludge Plant Addition at Reclamation
Plant No. 1, submitted their proposal, they listed Delaval Turbine, Inc.
as a subcontractor to perform the work as required for the engine and
blower assembly for this contract. Delaval Turbine, Inc. has subsequently
refused to enter into a subcontract with Donovan Construction Company
inasmuch as they are desirous of being a prime supplier and not a sub-
contractor .. In accordance with Section 4100·et seq of the Government
Code, if the prime contractor does not list a subcontractor, it is
presumed that he is capable of performing the work himself and also, if
a listed subcontractor refuses to enter into a subcontract with the
prime contractor, then the prime contr~ctor has the preogative of ~ssuming
the work or making a substitution therefor.
It ts recommended that the Board of Directors allow the delisting of
Delaval Turbine, Inc. from this contract and that the responsib)lity at
this time be assigned to Donovan Construction Company according to the
requirements of the Government Code.· Please refer to the two attached
letters from the affected parties.
REL:hje
AGENDA ITEM #17-A(l)(c) -VI-ALL DISTRICTS
M E M 0 R A N 0 U M
October 15, 1974
TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager
FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
. COUNTY SANITATION DIS!RICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71.t) 540-2910
(71.t) 962-2411
SUBJECT: Additional Pumping Facilities for Ocean Outfall Booster Station at
Plant No. 2 -Job No. J-6-1
Evaluation of Construction Bid Received on September 5, 1974
Bid·s were received on September 5th for the installation of two engine driven
pumping facilities at the Districts' ocean outfall booster station at Plant
No. 2. Only one bid was received, from Bovee & Crail Construction Company, in
the total lump sum amount of $1,678,700.
In September, 1972, the staff submitted to the State Water Resources Control
Board and the Environmental Protection Agency, Project Report No. 2 for the
1972-73 Joint Works Improvements and Additions. This Project Report included
the installation of two gas driven pumps at the Foster Outfall Booster Station.
The estimated cost as presented in the Report was $775,000. As of this date,
the State has not elected to place this particular project on a fundable priority
but because of the necessity of providing for these needed pumping facilities,
the staff, with previous authorization from the Board, has proceeded with the
preparation of the plans and specifications and solicitation of the bids for these
pumping units. The staff had recommended a budge~ary amount of $900,000. for the
1974-75 fiscal year for these pumps and e~gines. At the time the engineer
submitted the plans and specifications for this project, the Engineer's Estimate
was $1,390,0,00.
In light of the sole bid received for this project, the staff requested the
assistance of The Shirley Company, a mechanical engineering construction company,
to evaluate the bid submitted by Bovee & Crail. It is evident that the principal
part of this contract is the ~quipment purchase which John Carollo Engineers had
estimated at an amount of $616,000, wherein the bid from Bovee & Crail and the
evaluation from The Shirley Company reveal an equipment purchase in excess of
$1,000,000.
IM this period of spiraling escalation, it is most difficult to anticipate
equipment purchases at this time. Most equipment' manufacturers will quote to a
contractor with a base price plus a 1-1/2 to 2 percent per month escalation
clause, or quote on a lump sum which projects the escalation to the date of
delivery and normally includes the monthly escalation as previously stated. The
staff and consulting engineers have reviewed the scope of the project since the
receipt of the bids and have determined that the plans and specifications cannot
be revised and still meet the requirements necessary for this facility. It is
doubtful that rejection of the single bid received by Bovee & Crail Construction
Company and readvertisement will result in any savings.
AGENDA ITEM #17-B(l) VII-1 ALL DISTRICTS
Fred A. Harper
October 15, 1974 ·
Page Two
It is essential that the Districts proceed as rapidly as possible to complete this
needed facility. The Board has two apparent alternatives for consideration:
1. Accept the bid as submitted by Bovee & Crail in the total amount of
$1,678,700.
2. Reject the bid as received and allow the Districts' forces to proceed
on a "force account" basis to perform the work.
To proceed with the "force account'.' basis, the staff must have the authority to
negotiate for the major items of equipment where competitive equipment is not
available. In those areas where competition is available, the staff would proceed·
with a competitive bid procedure. On a "force account" basis, it must be realized
that the staff would have to assume the systems responsibility to insure that the
components are compatible with the final design. This effort in itself is
estimated to be one man-year of engineering time. After the procurement of all
the necessary mechanical equipment, the Districts would then either solicit
proposals for an installation contract or perform the work w·ith its own forces.
It is my recommendation that the Board of Directors reject the bid of Bovee &
Crail Construction Company and that the General Manager be given the authority
to negotiate those essential equipment purchases necessary for this project and
that other work as required be performed by either Districts• personnel or
competitive bids·be received therefor. Please refer to the attached letters
from The Shirley Company and John Carollo Engineers.
REL: hje
AGENDA ITEM #17-B(l) VII-2 ALL DISTRICTS
J.OHN CAROLLO
' '
PHOENIX
ARIZONA
JOHN A. CAROLLO, P.E. < 1906-1971 >
H. HARVEY HUNT, P.E.
HOWARD M. WAY, P.E.
ROBERT G. WILLIAMS, P.E.
DONALD R. PREISLER, P.E.
GAIL P. LYNCH, P.E.
WALNUT CREEK
CALIFORNIA
Mr. Fred A. Harper, General .Manager
ENGINEERS
SANTA ANA
CALIFORNIA
WALNUT CREEK PLAZA, SUITE 750
1990 NORTH CALIFORNIA BLVD
WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94596
AREA CODE: (415> 932·1710
Septanber 16, 1974
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Post Office Box 8127 ·
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject: Additional Pranpin3' Facilities at Ocean
Outfall Pranping Station, Job No. J-6-1
We have reviewed the bid received on Septanber 5, 1974 for
construction of the subject job. One bid was received in the airount
of $1,678,700 fran Bovee & Crail Construction CCinpany, Param::>nt, cali-
fornia. Their bid was presented in proper fonn with required bid bond.
The engineers estimate for construction was $1,390,000. The
above bid exceeds the engineers estimate by about 21 percent. We have
obtained a breakdcMn of the contractor's bid and canpared it to the en-
gineers estimate (see attached) ~ In general, all items ccmpared very
closely except the furnishing and installation of the engine and pump-
ing equipnent. There was a large discrepancy on this itan.
The engineers estimate included $904,604, while the contractor
used $1,211,400 for this item. The large difference is apparently at-
tributable to escalation of equipnent prices fran current levels to anti-
cipated pricing at time of delivery, (about one year after order) . Our
estimate fran the suppliers for furnishinJ equipnent·at the time we pre-
pared our estimate was about $500,000.
We evaluated and presented to you various alternatives for re-
design of the job us:Lm electric driven equipnent on Septenber 12, 1974,
and it was mutually decide:l that the most econanical approach was to stay
with the gas engines as designed.
AGENDA ITEM #17-B(l) VII-3 ALL DISTRICTS
,,;
... •.
Mr. Fred A. Harper
Septanber 16, 1974
Page 2
Your suggestion that the Districts purchase the equipnent .
directly arrl have it installed would be a satisfactory methcrl ot pro-
ceedin:J wi~ the work.
We feel that the project is needed am recannerrl that Dis-
tricts proceed with the work as soon as possible in the methcxl which is
deaned by yoo to be rrost econanical.
JOHN CAROLID EN:;INEERS
WH:j
AGENDA ITEM #17-B(l) VII-4 ALL DISTRICTS
•
.. .
CDUNIY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE OOUNI'Y
OONI'RACT CX\ST cnMPARISON
JOB NO. J-6-1
Q)NI'RACI'OR JCE
BRFAKrG\7N ESTIMATE
General Civil W:>rk $ 67,800 $ 48,719
Pipirxj 255,000 235,100
*Equipnent Purchase 1,090,400 616,367
*Equipnent Installation 100,000 288,237
Misc. Mechanical 22,000 55,808
Misc. Steel & Al.um. 28,000 33,786
Electrical 75,000 100,000
Pain~ 9,500 11,983
Pond 10,000 included arove
*Spare Parts 21,000 included above
$1,678,700 $1,390,000
* Major difference is in equipnent purchase price. Totals for purchase
an::1 installation of pump arrl engine package is as follows:
$1,211,400 $ 904,604
AGENDA ITEM #17-B(l) VII-5 ALL DISTRICTS
-' 4..
THE SHIRLEY COMPANY
CONSTRUCTION
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention: Mr. Ray Lewis
Chief Engineer
October 3, 1974
Subject: Additional Pumping Facilities for Ocean
Outfall Booster Station
Job No. J-6-1
Evaluation of Construction Bids
.Gentlemen:
In response to your letter of September 26, 1974, enclosed
please find our evaluation of·' the subject project. We have
included all of original work sheets plus any written quo-
tations which we have been able to obtain from major suppli-
ers and or subcontractors.
A comparison of our estimate to that of the low (sole) bid-
der and John Carollo Engineers is as followes:
ITEM BOVEE
CRAIL JCE TSC
General Civil Work 67,800 48,719 31,880
Piping 255,000 235,100 229,430
Equipment Purchase 1,090,400 616,367 1,136,870
Equipment Installation 100,000 288,237 62,530
Misc. Mechanical 22,000 55,808 42,880
Misc. Steel and Alum. 28,000 33,786 50,700
Electrical 75,000 100,000 55,600
Painting 9,500 11,983 9,970
Bond 10,000 in above in above
Spare Parts 21,000 in above 22,870
Total 1,678,100 1,390,000 1,642,730
Z32•1 VENTURA BOULEVARD / SUITE 310 / WOODLAND HILLS / CALIFORNIA / 91384 / TELEPHONE {213) 884·7220
AGENDA ITEM #17-B(l) VII-6 ALL DISTRICTS
• .•
r
Page 2
October 3, 1974
We would point out the following items which should be taken
into effect in your evaluation and your intrepation of our
estimate:
1).It is a physical impossibility that this project could be
completed within the 420 calender days allocated by the spec-.
ifications. This fact is based on White Superiors quoted
shippment date of 56 ·weeks after receipt of order and time
for Engineers approval. We believe the earliest completion
date that could be anticipated to be 510 calender days.
This could force bidders to include 18,000.00 liquidating
damages intheir bid. We have included an allowance of
18,000.00 under our c9ntingency and profit item.
2).0ur piping prices could be somewhat high as we used the
current TRADE BOOK·prices less 10%. Discounts normally range
between 20% and 50% depending on the material involved how-
ever we feel a conservative view should be taken due to the
fact that we have been experiencing widely fluctuating prices
and find that a discount quoted today is of no value tomorrow.
3).Due to the limited time we have spent on evaluation we.
have estimated the cost of may of the smaller items and feel
we could be somewhat high or· low in certain areas.
4).The quotation received on the· standby emergency generator
set was firm if an order was placed prior to October 26, 1974.
After this escalation at a rate 1% per month would apply.
, .
5).There is some confusion in the list of equipment and
materials supplied by the engine manufacture White Superior.
After ~everal conversations with their local representative
the confusion still remains. As a result we may have dup-
licated some costs.
6).The area in which the largest savings to the districts
could be realized, we believe, is that of equipment purcha-
sing. The districts could purchase the equipment direct
from the manufacture at their base (todays) price with an
understanding that final determination of price would be made
at the time of shippment. White Superior's base bid which
included most of the major prices of equipment was $712,000
with a bid price to the contractors o~ $987,000. This
escalation of 275,000.00 representates 38% of the base bid
or 2.375% per month using their 16 month shippment period.
AGENDA ITEM 17-B(l) VII-7 ALL DISTRICTS
.~
Page 3
October 3, 1974
It is not only our opinion but several other manufactures
that a 1% per month. _escalation should be adequate. 1% per
month of White Superiors base bid escalated for 16 ~onths
amounts to $114,000.00 or a savings to the districts of
$161,000.00.
7).0bviously the districts understood their needs and based
on this 1 certain equipment was spelled out in the specifica-
tions. The result however was to limit competition to only
one manf acturer thus reducing the chance for a truly compet-
itive bid on thier part.
CONCLUSION
It is our opinion that the bid received on September 5, 1974
from Bovee-Crail for the subject project were as competive
as could be expected. While it is true that if we were to
have competed against Bovee-Crail at the bid opening we may
have been the low bidder there would hot have been a marked
difference.
Based on all of the above it is our opinion that the lowest
possibl~ cost the Districts could anticipate spending
through a complete rework of this project is as followes:
THE SHIRLEY COMPANY ESTIMATE
LESS: Liquidated Damages
Pre purchase by the Districts of
major equipment. Price in effect
at time of shippment
TOTAL
$1,642,730.00
(18,000.00)
'(161,000.00)
$1,463,730.00
We sincerly trust you will be able to understand our standard
work sheets and method of pricing. Should you have any additional
questions please do no~ hesitate to contact us.
we wish to thank you for considering our company to make this
evaluation and hope you will include oµr firm name on your
bid list for future work.
V~ry truly yours
.. E SJII~~J SoMP~Y ~
}_~ f~:i\~h'r/{,/,(./( "if 11/ mn .I:'. S irley '1ii
President
AGENDA ITEM #17-B(l) VII-8 ALL DISTRICTS
RESOLUTION NO. 74-141
.REJECTING ALL BIDS FOR ADDITIONAL PUMPING
FACILITIES AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUr.IPING STATION,
JOB NO. J-6-1, AND DIRECTING COMPLETION OF
WORK BY l:t,ORCE ACCOUNT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
REJECTING ALL BIDS FOR ADDITIONAL PUMPING
FACILITIES AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION,
JOB NO. J-6-1, AND DIRECTING THE WORK BE
COMPLETED BY FORCE ACCOUNT
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, do hereby
determine that:
WHEREAS, the Districts have published Notice Inviting B.ids for
Additional Pumping Facilities at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job
No. J-6-1, in accordance with the provisions _of Section 4755 of the
State Health and Safety Code, and on September 5, 1974, publicly
opened and· read all bids submitted; and,
WHEREAS, the sole bid received has been evaluated by the
Districts' engineers and staff, and the .apparent low bid exceeds
the engineers' estimate by approximately twenty-one percent (21%);
and,
WHEREAS, the Chief Engineer has this day submitted a written
recommendation that all bids be rejected and work be completed under
the Districts' force account,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
Section 1. That the bid tabulation and recommendation of the
Chief Engineer be received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That all biµs received for said work be hereby
rejected and that all bid bonds be .returned to the bidders; and,
Section 3. That the Boards of Directors do hereby declare that
said work can pe performed more economically by utilization of day
labor, or the materials or supplies furnished at a lower price in
the open market; and,
Section 4. That the Districts' staff is hereby directed to
proceed with and complete Additional Pumping Facilities at Ocean
AGENDA ITEM #17-B(2) VIII-1 ALL DISTRICTS
Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-1, by force account; and,
Section 5. That the Districts' staff be authorized to
negotiate for purchase of proprietary equipment for said job, all
other materials to be acquired in accordance with the established
~ purchasing procedures.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held
October 16, 1974~
AGENDA ITEM #17-B(2) VIII-2 ALL DISTRICTS
Engineer's Estimate $1,390,000
BID T A B U L A T I 0 N
SHEET
Date September 5, 1974 -11 :00 A.M.
Contract For: Additional Pumping Facilities at Ocean
Outfall Pumping Station -Contract No. J-6-1
CONTRACTOR
l. Bovee & Crail Construction Company
15200 Downey Avenue
Paramount, California 90723
2·.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
AGENDA ITEM #17-b(2) IX
TOTAL BID
$1,678,700,00
ALL DISTRICTS
---·-·'
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING· DOCUMENTS .
October 16, 1974 -·7:30 p.m.
GOLDEN WEST FERTILIZER COMPANY
80 I I Irvine Boulevard Santa Ana, Calif. 92705
Phone (714) 832-1860
Septe~ber 10, 1974
Mr. Fred Harper
Orange County Sanitation District
Fountain Valley, California
.·PROPOSED RECLAEATIOlT BY GOLDE~J WEST FE~TILIZSB co~~ANY OF
•. CE!JTRI?UGED S=:WAGE SLUDGE WITH NO HORE THAN EIGHTY FEBCE:~T ( 80%) .
. MQISTtTRE CONTENT
Dear Fred:
Golden West Fertilizer Company would like to amend their current
contract concerning the reclamation of sewage from plants #1 and
#2 in the following ways.
Due to expansi?n of the total.operat~?n,Ait will. be ne?essary to
extend the contract for a period of __ ,, years beyond its present
duration. This extensio~ is due to costs incurred vs profits
obtained from.this operation in order for. it to be economically
justified. Golden West Fertilizer· Company has ew.barked on
construction of a sludge drying machine which, if it operates to
engineering specifications, can revolutionize the sludge reclamation
industry. This project will cost Go~den West Fertilizer Company
a minimum of $70,000.0~ over the next 6 months. . ·
. .
Due to the increase in the number of cubic yards.of sewage sludge
that Golden West Fertilizer Comp3...'Yl.Y will be required to ~reat,
Golden West Fertilizer Company needs the following conditions met.
Material being taken from pl2..nt #1 will be transported from the
premises to Golden West Fertilizer Company facilities at Irvine
at a cost to the county of ;;;2.00 per cubic yard.
Materials at plnnt //2 will be handled in the following manner.
Orange Cotmty Salli t;J.tion District will grade and pack an area of
approxirr.ately 5.3 ~cres adjacent to the current centrifuge site.
Odor control spray lines will be installed by Orange Cou.""1.ty
Sanitation District around the perimeter of the 5.3 acreso
Cr~ge Cou."lty Sanitation District will provide needed methane
sludge gas for the heating of the experinental drying m9chine.
Only th~ m~tha..'Yl~ gas now being flared will be necessc::ry for this
experin:en ting.
(continued)
AGENDA ITEM #9(a) A-1 ALL DISTRICTS
I· ,
Mr. Fred Harper
Ora~~e County Sanitation District
Septenber 10, 1974
-paee 2
The material which Golden West Fertilizer Co~pany will be· receiving
at plant #2 must not exceed eighty percent {80;;) in moisture
content, nor shall it be found to be unsuitable as a plant-growing
medium. If either of these problems occurs, Golden West Fertilizer
Company is not required to accept said material.
Orange County Sanitation District will also pay Golden West
Fertilizer Co~pany at a rate of Jl.00 per cubic yard of centrifuged
sludge with a minir.iuo daily guarantee of ~~80. 00 :if tl:ler• is l1t1•6
tho:n-lBO oubio yar d!5 of ~h~~o-pr~'OR= aiXly gj ven-tt~y. Golden
West Fertilizer Co~p~~y aclrnowledges that there will be an
approximate minimum of 200 cubic yards per day of centrifuged
sludge produced and a maximum of 300 cubic yards per day, and that
thi's will continue on a seven-day-per-week basis. excluding six
holidays per year.
Golden West Fertilizer Company will use one Caterpillar loader with
a four cubic yard loading bucket. Also to·be installed by Golden
west Fertilizer Company will be a screening operation for loading
of material into bulk trucks and also for bagging purposes. The
screening operation will take up an area of approxirr.ately 20 1 . X 60 1 •
A packaging facility will also be installed approximately in
January, 1975 and will also be housed in an area.approximately
20 1 X 60 1 • There will be a foreman on the facility during all
working hours, along with approximately 2 -7 employees, the latter
being for a bagging .crew while bagging is done.
T~e sewage sludge will be delivered to the five-acre processing
site by Orange County Sanitation District and placed on an area
over ·Nhich. coarse shavings will have been spread so that no seepage
from the sludge will go into the soil. Golden West Fertilizer
Company will then mix the sludge with the shavings at a rate of
approximately 1-1 for both materials and will stockpile it normally
within a short time to insure minimal odor nroblems. These comuost
piles will ·be turned on an average of once a week until the material
is dried and composted enough to meet all current laws concernine;
the handling of such materials. It will then be removed ·from the
processing facility by either Golden West Fertilizer Company
transport units or by other wholesale establishments.
Sincerely,
1
/)
t --(J {'t»(11.
Gordon P. Cooper
Operations Manager
Golden West Fertilizer Company
AGENDA ITEM #9(a) A-2 ALL DISTRICTS
RESOLUTION NO. 74-127
DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO APPROVE
CHANGE ORDERS TO GENERAL MANAGER
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO THE GENERAL MANAGER
TO APPROVE CERTAIN CHANGE ORDERS IN CONTRACTS
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SEWERAGE FACILITIES
FOR THE DISTRICT(S) NOT TO EXCEED $25,000
* * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the General Manager be and he is hereby
authorized to approve, execute, and deliver change orders for
unforeseen or unanticipated conditions in connection with contracts
for the construction of sewerage facilities for a District or
Districts, _providing that no one change. order shall increase the
~ contract price more than $25,000.00; and,
"
Section 2. That this authority shall apply to all existing
contracts for the construction of sewerage facilities and all such
contracts entered into in the future until this resolution is
amended or repealed; and,
Section 3. That nothing contained in this resolution shall
be construed to authorize the General Ma·nager to execute a final
closeout agreement with the contractor in any such contract or to
finally accept the work constructed under such a contract.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held
October 16, 1974.
AGENDA ITEM #9(c) -B-ALL DISTRICTS
. --
cou:ay ~~ . .\:~n-,·.1: ~·:. n1~;Ti:1l:T~.~ ()J .. \>!';\::~;1. cou::TY
l'. o. }:ox Sl27 -l0~:.1.i Elli!; ~\\"("llllC
Fount~in Vall.cy, Californja ~}270B
CllA~~GE Ol~DER c. o. ;\o.
J~<TRACTOit: Hemisphere Constructors DATE __ O__.c.__t_o_b_e_r_9_
1
_l ~--·
J!3: Digestcrs "N" & "0" at Plant No. 2, Job No. PZ-21
Amount of this Ch:ingc Order (<Jx:c!) (NX}JNX::q $ 0. 00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the'-"'
bntract antl/or contract ,,·ork arc hereby nuthorizc,l an<l as co1:ipcnsation
hcrcfor, t:1c following additions to or dc<luctions from the.: contract price arc
ercbr approved. • ..
Extension of Contract Time
The Contractor is hereby granted
an extension of time for delayed
delivery of equipment
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION
· Summary of Contract Time
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original· Completion Date
Total Time Extension
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
-----
.·
61 Calendar Davs
61 Calendar Davs
January 25, 1S73"-'
300 Calendar Days
Noyernber 21, 1973
313 Calsndar Days
613 Calendar Days
September 30, 1974
Original Contr~ct Price $ 1 ' 0 6 8 ' 4 1 ~·. 0 0 --
$ _~_.!_~ 61. 98 Prev. Auth. Changes
This Ch~nge t\'~XX) U'{~mX~l{) $ ______ 0_._00~--
A~cn<lcd Co~tr~ct Price s 1 ' 0 7 7 ' 3 7 4 • 9'8
BNll'<l authorization <l{!te: CX:tobcr 16, 1974 .Approved:
cnu;,;TY S.'\;\IT;\'f IO~J nr ~.>TRI CT:-~ \.°'·r
0 r 0.. n z e County , Cl, 1 if or n i :~
By
-rc·r,...----~-,·---,--..
\..,, l J. '. ~· l J. l I:·:: ; , ·
AGENDA T._TE_M_#_lQ_(_a) -C-ALL DISTRICTS
RESOLUTION NO. 74-128
, ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-21 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-21 AS COMPLETE AND
APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and.11,of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contrac·tor, Hemisphere Constructors, has
completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the
contract for DIGESTERS "N" & "O" AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-21, on
the 25th of September, 1974; and,
Section 2. That by letter, John Carollo Engineers, Districts'
engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as. having been
completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the Districts has con-
curred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation
is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That Digesters "N" & "O" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-21,
is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the
contract therefor, dated the 25th of January, 1973; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby
authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Hemisphere
·Constructors, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance
of Digesters "N" & "O" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-21, is hereby
approved; and,
Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of
Directors of District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to
execute said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held
October 16, 1974.
AGENDA ITEM # 10 (b) -D-ALL DISTRICTS
BID T A B U L A T I 0 N
SHEET
October 1, 1974 Date=--~----------------~ 11:00 a.m.
Contract For:
BIDDER
THREE (3) 4-WHEEL ELECTRIC CARS
SPECIFICATION NO. A-072
·l. Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company
2114 W. Ball Road
Anaheim, ·CA 92804
2. Dutch Stark Company
18217 Arminta Street
Reseda, CA 91335
3. Westinghouse.Electric Corporation
i6701 Redlands Blvd.
Redlands, CA 92373
TOTAL BID
$5,855.17
No "Bid
No Bid
It is recommended that award be made to Taylor-Dunn
Manufacturing Company in the amount of $5,855.17.
AGENDA ITEM #lO(c)
W. N. Clarke
Superintendent
-E-ALL DISTRICTS
RESOLUTION NO. 74-129
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 71-3 3 AS AMENDED
(POSITIONS AND SALARIES)
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF.
DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING POSITIONS
AND SALARIES RESOLUTION NO. 71-3, AS
AMENDED
* * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Resolution No. 71-3, as amended, is ~ereby
further amended by the addition of Exhibit "A" dated October, 1974;
and,
Section 2. That Exhibit "A" dated September, 1974, is hereby
rescinded; and,
Section 3. That any other resolutions or motions or portions
thereof that conflict herewith are hereby repealed and made of no
further effect; and,
Section 4. That this resolution shall become effective
October 1, 1974.
AGENDA ITEM #lO(d) F-1 ALL DISTRICTS
~
I
f\)
:r::--
t-t t-t
t:1
H
(/)
1-3
:::0
I~
I
EXECUTIVE
COHHITTEE
I
I
DIR OF FINANCE
' SEC TO BOARDS
32 I (28)
AUMIH' FINAlil.E. Ull"I -
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
.SUHHARY · ORCAlll ZAT I 0.'IAL CHART
OCTOBER, 197lt
BOARDS
or .
.. DIRECTORS
259 {217)
GENERAL
MNAGER
191 _(ll::>OJ . ~!,~. QPEB ~ LABORATORY DEPT~
18 I ttfi>
' I llD I. ~ •r.,ADl'U TATS _.._ ____..__ _,_____,
SENIOR SENIOR PROC & ,
ACCOUNTANT ACCOUNTANT PROP CHIEF
SR FACL
SUPV
· OPER
ENG I NEER
.r.2 (33) 23 (21) 41 (32)
COLL HECH FACL
FAC I LIT! ES FACILITIES
SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR
I I
roqc.E STRUC-DIGES-GROUNDS SEWERS PUHP. ACCT TURES TERS $TAT!ON
SHOP & FIXED HOB I LE
EQUIP EQUIP
(
FACILITIES
SUPERVISOR
INSTRU-
HENTS ELECT
CHl·Ef
OPERATOR
TRHT
PLANT
OP En
.(
I
BACT
LAB
.
LABORATORY
SUPERVISOR
I I
CHEM INDUST
WASTE LAB LAB
I
CHIEF
ENC I NEER
I
MARINE
SPECIAL
C011111TTE£S
IN
CH I EF OF
INOUST '
PERHIT
ECOLOCY
PE RH IT
' CONN
-
EXHIBIT "A"
I CEN'L
COUNSEL
H I (28)
~-~~RING DEPT
SENIOR
ENGINEER
PLANT
CONSTR
MPS'
RAFTING
(
SENIOR
ENG I NEER
DIST
CONS TR
I
RES0t;i((£~
w.1,A(.~~l Iii
[NC 114Ll R
l'ES
'1Cl1T
([NJ[lt
. '-"""
PROGRESS REPORT
TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS
COUNTY SANITATION D1~Tl\ICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALI! u1m1A
P.O. BOX 812;"
10844 ELLIS AVrNI r
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFOM.NtA 92/0d
(7141 540-291 a
(714) 962-2<411
I-8-3 -INFLUENT METERING AND DIVERSION STRUCTURE -($1,503,679)
INFLUENT CHANNEL: Complete to existing Plant No. 1 influent.
INFLUENT PIPI!\G: Euclid, Sunflower,, and Newhope-Placentia Trunks flowing
through Diversion Structure and down to Plant No. 2.
METERING AND DIVERSIO~ STRUCTURE: Complete.
Contract approximately 97 percent complete to date.
P2-20 -POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT P-LANT NO. 2 -($158,294)
No work completed this month.
Contract approximately 58 percent complete to date.
P2-21 -DIGESTERS "N" AND "0" AT PLANT NO. 2·-($1,076,514)
DIGESTERS "N" AND "0": Complete.
DIGESTER CO~TROL BUILDING: Complete.
TUNNELS: Complete.
DI GE STER GAS C0~1PRESSORS: Complete .
. . ·.
STOR\f \\'ATER Pt.NP STATION: Complete.
Contract 100 percent complete.
Pl-16 -46 ~!GD ACTI\':\TFD srr;~r,~ P! .. \~;~ .-\T RECL\~·~:\TIO~: PUST ~o. 1 -($29,876,000)
Work on this project continues as planned. The 18 " VCP plant drain line
has been completed. Contractor is presently working on the 42" RCP bypass
line. Concrete ~ork has begun on the aeration basin, the blo~er and power
buildings concurrently. Pile driving continues and is approxim~tely thirty
percent complete.
..
AGENDA ITEM #lO(e) G-1 ALL DISTRICTS
•
..
Progress Report
Treatment Plant Projects
Page Two
TREAntEXT PLA~T \\'ORK
Total Value Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Total ~ork During September
Total Work Awaiting Award
DISTRICT TRUNK LI~'E \\'ORK
Total Value Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Total Work During September
Total \\'ork ·Under Design
Total Work Awaiting Award
$32,714,307
4,663,553
778,681
1,678,700
$10,880,193
6,098,608
848 ,450
17,442,695
4,602,992
TOTAL AMOUNT UNDER CONTRL\CT, DESIGN A."JD
AWAITING AWARD
October 10, 1974
....
AGENDA ITEM #lO(e) G-2
CouNTY SANITATioN D;srR1crs
of ORANGE COUNTY. C,;u;:c2ri1A
P.O. BOX 8127
IOB-44' ELLIS AVEr·-.uE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9270:1
(71-6) S..0-2910 ~
(71-6) 962-24 I I
$32,714,307
1,678,700
$10,880,193
17,442,695
4,602,992
..
$67,318,887
ALL DISTRICTS
:
homn
Frssociotes
121 GaJ/ WaJ~1°nglon Avenue, San/a Ana, Caf,/ornia 92701 (714} 541-5301
October 10, 1974
Board of Directors
County Sanitation.District No. 2 of Orange County, California
P. 0. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention: Mr. Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
Dear Mr. Lewis:
In accordance with your request, we are pleased to submit this proposal
for providing engineering services for the final plan~ and specifications
for the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Grove Street to the Orange County
Line (2-14-3). This reach will complete the project as originally out-
lined in our studies initiated in 1969, subsequent Master Plan study of
1971, and project reports and environmental impact reports prepared for
the various reaches of the project.
On October 31, 1973, the Board authorized us to conduct preliminary en-
gineering and alignment studies for this project. The results of that
were used in the preparation of a project report and an environmental
impact report for possible Federal and State grant funding for the Upper
Basin capacity in this project. Also included in that authorization was
the detailed mapping of the recommended route of the project. This work
is now well under way.
In order to meet the critical timing needs for this project, it is now
proposed to commence the preparation of the final plans and specifications.
Three ·possible contract reaches are proposed at this time. The first con-
tract would extend from Grove Street to Imperial Highway. This reach is
urgently needed by the District to provide relief capacity to the,District's
existing trunk sewer system. The upper two contract reaches are needed to
meet future capacity commitments for the District and capacity for' the
Upper Basin.
It is understood that the final sizing of the project will depend on the
future input from the cities within the tributary area and the final de-
cisions by the Board. Also, the timing of the contract reaches will be
dependent on grant considerations and the relationship with the Upper
Basin Agency. It is proposed to work closely with the District staff in
regard tu the timing and sequence of events in carrying out the proposed
design work.
AGENDA ITEM #lO(f)
10963 SAN DIEGO MISSION ROAD. SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92108
(714) 281-5567
H-1 DISTRICT 2
Mr. Ray E. Lewis
October 10, 1974
Page 2
The project will include a river crossing at Imperial Highway to tie into
the the existing south Santa Ana River trunk, and also a metering and
quality monitoring station at the County line. Costs are to be shared
with the Upper Basin in proportion to project capacity.
. .
We will perform the following professional engineering services for the
project in accordance with the following:
1) Hold conferences with District staf~, other interested agencies,
and private property owners who may be involved in the projects.
2) Make arrangements for and coordination of field surveys, soils
investigations, and related work.
3) Assist in obtaining permits from the affected governmental
agencies.
4) Prepare construction plans and specifications.
5) Prepare estimates of quantities and cost estimates.
6) Deliver the original plans and specifications to the District
for reproduction by the District.
7) Prepare legal descriptions and maps for right of way acquisition
as required.
8) Work with appraiser and attorney in right of way matters.
~) Assist the District in securing and tabulating bids, analyzing
bid results, and awarding contracts.
10) Check shop and working drawings as may be submitted by the
Oontractors.
11) Furnish consultation and advice to the District during construction.
12) Make final inspections and prepare reports of the completed projects.
13) Prepare as-built drawings of the completed work and file the origi-
nal drawings with the District.
AGENDA ITEM #lO(f) H-2 DISTRICT 2
Mr. Ray E. Lewis
October 10, 1974
Page 3
The estimated costs of the contract and the proposed design fees are
shown below. In our proposal for the preliminary engineering phase, it
was noted that the cost of our preliminary engineering work, not including
aerial mapping and surveying, would be deducted from the final design fees.
The appropriate deductions for this work already accomplished and the net
fee for each contr~ct are also shown.
Estimated Design Net San Dist.#2 Upper Basin
Contract Project Cost Fee Deductible Fee Share Share
Grove St.
to Imperial
Fwy(Reaches
2,3,4)
Imperial
Fwy to Bry-
ant Ranch
(Reach 5)
Bryant
Ranch to
County
Line
(Reaches
6,7,8)
TOTALS
$3,808,000
4,551,000
2,288,000
$10,647,000
$151,200 $5,100" $146,100 $31,800 $114,300
180,700 6,100 174,600 10,900 163,700
90,800 3,000 87,800--0 87,800
$422,700 $14,200 $408,500 $42,700 $365,800
Field surveys will be required for construction staking. In addition, soils
investigations will be needed along the route of the project. We propose
that all field surveys be performed on a per diem basis at the following
hourly rates:
2-man survey party $41. 25/hr
3-man survey party $60.00/hr
Survey Supervisor $20.75/hr
These rates are subject to revision after August 1, 1975, under the terms
and conditions of the operating engineer's surveyors contract. Soil inves-
tigation costs will be billed at our actual cost upon prior approval by
District staff. Payment is to be monthly as invoiced.
AGENDA ITEM #lO(f) H-3 DISTRICT 2
I
I
I
!·
Mr. Ray E. Lewis
October 10, 1974
Page 4
We propose that all other outside services required and approved by the
District, such as plant inspection for quality control of materials used
on project construction, will be paid directly by the District upon pre-
sentation of a statement of such outside services with the Engineer's
certification.
It is proposed that payment of design fees be monthly on a percentage-
completed basis up to 95% at time of delivery of plans and specifications,
and 100% payment when the work is completed and accepted by the District.
After authorization to proceed is given," the work can be accomplished in
accordance with the construction schedule as outlined in the project re-
port and as previously discussed with the Board.
Very truly yours,
Lowry and Associates
Donald·J. Martinson
DJM:skc
AGENDA ITEM #lO(f) H-4 DISTRICT 2
cuu;,ry :.;:\~HT,\THl:: J)J:~ri:H:r:. ll!: d;.,\·:~;i cD:;:;ri'
P • 0 • Box 3 1 2 7 -· 1 o ., . i ·: E 11 j !; . \ v r: 11 u c
Fount 3 i 11 V ~i. ll c )' ; Ci 1 i r" r 11 i a ~J 2 7 0 8
CJLl\~:GE OIU>i:l{
. . .. ·. .) Kas ler Corporation &· L. fl. Woods
.(h rr .. AC1 Q;,: -.L~Q.~Inc. I /\ Joint Venture
C. 0. !\O. 3
~---~~~~~~~~ DATE October 3, 197.t
OB:· Santa An:i R i vc·r Interceptor Sewer from Kate Ila AvC'nuc to La Palm:t Avenue, Contract No. 2-l·l -~
Arilount of thi5 Change Order (ADD) (Nl."Oll~~ s 4,488.75
...._,. In accordance with contract provisions, the following chang.cs in the
bn tract and/ or contract Hork a re here i>y ·au th or i z c<l an<l as coupensa t ion
here for, t:-1c following a<l<li tions to or c.1cJuctioHs from the.; co11tract price arc
;ere by approvcJ.
Reference~ Contractor's letter to District
dated September 6, 1974 and
District's letter to contractor
dated September 10, 1974
ADD:
For additional work involved to support the 16"
high pressure .oil line between Stations 497+30
and .503+30 shown at elevation 168: and found to
be at elevation 174: and 2 feet closer to the
center line of the sewer than shown on the plans
and therefore projecting· into the trench prism.
·~-
Extension of Contract Time
~The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of
time due to the above work
TOTAL ADD
·TOTAL TIME EXTENSION
Summary of Contract Time
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension This Change Order
Total Time Extension
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
.·
Original Contract Price
Prcv. Au th. Changes
$4,488.75
$4 ,488 .. 75
4 Calendar Days
4 Calendar Days
·November 29, 1973
380 Calendar Days
December 14, 1974
4 Calendar Days
· 35 Calendar Days
415 Calendar Days
January 18, 1975
$ 3,545,635.33
$ o.oo
This Chanr,c (ADD) (~l~~X~1~ $ 4,488.75 ---,--·--
J\r.1Cnd eel
Hoare!. authorization date: October 16, 1974
liy -----
AGENDA ITEM #lO(g) -I-
Contract Price s 3,SS0,124.08
··-----------. ---------------·-·--
Approvell:
COU:\'l Y S:H~ITATio;.: DISTRICTS of
Orange Cou~1ty, California
By
DISTRICT 2
cou;;ry S:\:HT,\T Io:~ -J>I STi: J CTS OF O!' . .,\::GE cou::TY
P. o. Box· 8127 -lOo-14 Elli:; .;\v~nue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHA~GE Olll>ER
Kasler Cor~orition 6 L~ H. Woods
J: \Tr ..A CT 0 rt : _.i.&'--11.js~o..un~s ... _T,uD.i.C-..,._,Q,A_.io.&.110....,jun..a.t----.V.e.u.D.1.1!11.1...lTuP..__ ______ _
C.O. NO. 4 DATE ---O-c~t-o_b_e_r~3--1_9_7_4 ___ __
JB: Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer from Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-2
·Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (~K~t). $ 20,500.00 .
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the.._.,,
ontract anc.l/or contract work arc hereby n.uthorizcc.l and as cor.tpensation
hcrcfor, t~e following additions to or deductions from t11c contract price are
ercby approved.
ADD:
For an additional 50 ft.± of 32" minimum diameter
jacked casing pipe for the 18" VCP sewer at Station
643+31.. Work necessary due to additional fill placed
in the area by the Flood Control District after award
of contract. Work to be accomplished for the lump
sum price of $7,500.00
For additionaJ rip-rap and grouting of this rip-rap
from Station 643+30± to Station 643+60 and from
Station 647+60 to Station 648+00. Work necessary due
to additional rip-rap placed in this area for grouting
of thi~ rip-rap by the Flood Control District after
award of contract. Work to be accomplished for th~
lump sum price of $13,000.00
Extension of Contract ·Time
Add
TOTAL .ADD.
$ 7,500.00
i3,000.00
$20 ,soo. oc~
The Contractor is hereby gTanted an extension of
time due to the above work 10 Calendar Days
.Summary of Contract Time
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension This Change Order
Total Time Extension
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION
Original Contract.Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Channe (ADD) (/J!IDU~T.g
Amended Contract Price
$
$
$
$
10 Calendar Days
November 29, 1973
380 Calendar Days
December 14, 1974
10 Calendar Days
45 Calendar Days
425 Calendar Days
January 28, 1975
3,545,635.33
4,488.75
20,500.00
~ .,
3,570,624.08
l>oard authoriz'1tion date: October 16, 1974 Approved:
By------------~----~--~------~ Consulting Engineer
By---------------------~-:--~~~ Contractor
AGENDA ITEM #lO(g) -J-
COU?\TY SJ\NITATimJ DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By
--------------------~c~;1_1_c-~r·,__L_·1_1_0_1_n_c_c
~ 1
DISTRICT 2
RESOLUTION NO. 74-132-2
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF PIPE LINE LICENSE
AGREEMENT WITH THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE
RAILWAY COMPANY FOR RIGHT OF WAY RE CONTRACT 2-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRI9T NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING.EXECUTION OF A PIPE LINE
LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND
SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY FOR RIGHT OF WAY IN
CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THE PALM DRIVE
INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-17
* * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Pipe Line License Agreement, dated
August 28, 1974, wherein The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway
~ompany grants to County Sanitation District No. 2 the right to
construct the Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-17, through
the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company right of way in the
vicinity of Crowther Avenue and Carbon Canyon Channel, is hereby
approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That payment in the amount of $150.00 for use of
said right of way is hereby authorized; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District
are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf
of the District, in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held
October 16, 1974.
AGENDA ITEM #lO(h) -K-DISTRICT 2
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
October 10, 1974
Fred A. Harper, General Manag.er
Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No. 2-14-2
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108-'-' ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71-') S-'0-2910 ~
(71-') 962-2" 11
Pipe installation has been completed up to the .south side of the Riverside
Freeway. Tunnel work under Taft Road and the Southern Pacific Railroad has
been completed-. Backfilling operations has been completed up to the south
side of Lincoln Avenue. The levy on the east side of the Santa Ana River
has been restored to the original shape prior to construction
A field meetirig was held last week with Orange County Road Department pertaining
to open cut of Lincoln Avenue. Permission was g:-anted to open cut Lincoln
October 7, 1974. It was necessary to close Lincoln Bridge to all through
traffic during trenching operations in order to provide maximum safety to
the public and the contractor. Five 8' joints of RCP have been placed across
Lincoln Avenue.
Excavation of jacking pit on Grove Street has been completed and nine joints of
pipe have been installed under the Riverside Freeway.
Excavation of jacking pit on Riverdale Avenue has been completed and 50' of
liner plate has been pushed under the AT&SF Railroad.
Pipe ins.tallation is expected to begin next week on Grove Street. The
contractor estimates completion of this project by the first of November 1974.
REL:BEW:TR:ss
•
AGENDA ITEM #lO(j) L-1 DISTRICT 2
.r
( ( . (
-.. --·--CDMPL\:1f
eoooe Toe~ CON51Ruc1ro
B I D
.
Engineer's Estimate: $4,435,305 (9-11-74)
$4,735,905 (10-7-74)
TABULATION
S.H EE T
Date October 8, 1974 ~ 11 :00 A.M •
Contract For: Knott Interceptor,. Reaches 5 and 6
1.
Contract No. 3-20-1
CONTRACTOR
Sully-Miller Contracting Co.
Long Beach
A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. and
N. M. Saliba Co.
·North Hollywood, California
J. F. Shea Co.
Walnut
4. John A. Artukov i ch Sons, Inc.
5.
6.
8.
9.
10.
Paramount
Kordick & Rados
Huntington Beach
H. M. Byars Construction Co.
Reno, Nevada
AGENDA ITEM #10(1)
TOTAL BID
$4,602,992,00
$4,706,572.00
$4,772,710.00
$4,864,570.00
$5,249,220.00
$5 '326 ,~577. 00
-M-DISTRICT 3
RESOLUTION NO. 74-139-3
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FOR
ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY FROM STATE OF
CALIFORNIA RE CONTRACT NO. 3-14 (REVISED)
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF AGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY
FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN CONNECTION
WITH CONSTRUCTION OF WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR
FACILITIES, WESTMINSTER AVENUE INTERCEPTOR
SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3.-14 (REVISED)
* * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain agreement, dated ---------
for acquisition from the State of California of approximately
1,200 sq. ft. of property located in the vicinity of Westminster
Avenue and the San Diego Freeway, in connection with construction·
of Westside Interceptor Facilities, Westminster Avenue Interceptor
Sewer, Contract No. 3-14 (Revised), is hereby approved; and,
Section 2. That said property is more particularly delineated
on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and by reference made a part of this
resolution; and·,
Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized and directed
to execute said agreement with the State of California for acquisition
of the property for the amount of $100.00.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held
October 16, 1974.
AGENDA ITEM #lO(n) -N-DISTRICT 3
H E M 0 R A N D U M
October 10, 1974
TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager
FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
SUBJECT: Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No, 3-18
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(71"') 962-2411 ~
Pipe installation has been completed along Main Street up to Goldenwest.
not ·be installed this week due to a parade on Saturday, October 12, 1974.
parade will be routed along Goldenwest.
Pipe wi 11
.The
Backfill and compaction have been completed along Main Street up to Goldenwest.
The 8-inch water line along the west side of Hoover has been installed and
backfilled up to Hazard. The 8-inch water line is scheduled to be tested this
week.
The 8-inch VCP sewer along the north side of Main Street has been installed and
backfilled up to Locust, and is in service. Manholes on Bolsa, west of Beach
Boulevard, have been raised up to meet the proper grade of the asphalt paving and
concrete collars have been placed. Curbs and gutters are complete along the east
side of Hoover.
The manhole on Main Street at the corner of Goldenwest is installed and will be
backfilled this week. Minor adjustments have been made to the protective steel
shield used in the contractor's open trench. The width has been altered from
12-feet wide to 11-feet wide in order to accommodate the smaller diameter pipe to
be used on Goldenwest.
Pipe installation is scheduled to resume next week. and will begin on Westminster
Avenue.
The contractor has f i 1 ed .a c 1 aim for add it i ona 1 compensation for changed cond it i ens·.
These changed conditions are related to 8-inch and 12-inch abandoned gas mains,
abnormal depth of existing pavement on Bolsa Avenue, westerly of Beach Boulevard,
modification of traffic island on Bolsa Avenue between Wi·lson and Harper Streets
and interference of gas mains which it is claimed are not correctly shown on the
plans. The staff is evaluating the contractor's request for extra work,which work
appears to be eligible changes of approximately $30,000.
REL: hj e
AGENDA ITEM #lO(o) 0-1 DISTRICT 3
0
I
('\.)
t1
H
C/l
t-3 ::0 .
H •
0
t-3
w
CONT~ACT ~ ~-1!> ~ kN01'T lNi~Cf"PTO~
•·~·· ••111 • ;... .. ,_ COM t::;)lf.='1~
0 0 0 0 Q io B~ CONST~()cj~
· JWe"STMlN6T~.~
· M~~lA\.· '
.. PA2~ ...
' ·' .
';-·' ' \ ..
,,· _,,,.,'"I
'. .,, ..
' ' ,1 I' ..
•' ·.1 '
(
COUNTY
OF O~AN6e'
\
. .. . . -.·. ~ ~TT INl~~~iOrl
~ MIL.E'S oF ~~11 Pl~
CONTt<ACT AWA~~DI ~-1-97?1
· COST: $ ~ '?>~'1 1 -. I~ SCHfDUL.eao'Fo~ COMPL~TlON: 9 -,_ ,~
I
H E M 0 R A N D U M
October 10, 1974
TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager
FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108'°''°' ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71"') 5"'0-2910
(71"') 962-2411 ~
SUBJECT: Annexation No. 18 -Balsa Lease Annexation to County Sanitation
District No. 11
This request for annexation covers a parcel approximately 44.2 acres in size,
located adjacent to the boundaries of Sanitation District No.--11, lying westerly
of Edwards Street, approximately at the westerly extension of Ellis Avenue.
The Standard Oil Company of California has requested annexatiqn to Sanitation
District No. 11, wherein current oil brine disposal practices can be eliminated ~
by discharging into the Sanitation District's facilities. With the annexation
of these properties, Standard Oil could cease operation of their ocean outfall
wherein their present discharge has received considerable notice by the City of
Huntington Beach, the County and State Health Departments, as well as the
Regional Water Quality Control Board because of the discoloration associated with
the discharge. Although not detrimental to the marine environment or the public
use of the affected beach areas, the discharge is aesthetically displeasing and
attempts have been made to eliminate this discharge.
The overall District's Master Plan has included this area for capacities and it
is, therefore, recommended that it would be in the best interests of the tax-
payers of Orange County, as well as the people of District No. 11 to annex this
area to the District, but that annexation fees should be reviewed prior to
establishment of the cost of annexation to the District.
REL:hje
AGENDA ITEM #lO(s)(l) -P-DISTRICT 11
1.
I
RESOLUTION NO. 74-138-11
AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS -
ANNEXATION NO. 18
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
THE INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX
TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION
NO. 18-BOLSA LEASE ANNEXATION)
* * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
That an application for annexation of territory to itself be
made to the Local Agency Formation Commission as follows:
Section 1. That this proposal is made pursuant to Division 1 ·
(District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government
Code of the State of California; and,
Section 2. That this application is for the purpose of annexing
approximately 44.19·acres in the vicinity of Ellis Avenue extended
~ westerly of Edwards Street ·to provide sanitary sewer service to
said territory as requested by Sta.ndard Oil Company of Ca~ifornia,
owner of said property; and,
Section 3. That the territory to be annexed is u~inhabited;
and,
Section 4. That the designation assigned to the territory
proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 18 -Bolsa Lease Annexation
to County Sanitation District No. 11", the boundari·es of which are
more particularly described and delineated on Exhibit "A" and
Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by reference made a part of this
resolution; and,
Section 5. That annexation of said property shall be subject
to payment of fees established by the Board of Directors following
a review of the District's annexation policy; an~,
Section 6. That request is hereby made that such proceedings as
required by law be taken to complete this annexation.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular ~eeting held
October 16, 1974.
AGENDA ITEM #10(s)(2)--Q-DISTRICT 11
FIL!::D
In the Offi~~ cf ~he Secrf'tary
County Sanitation Distr1c-No .. ~
OCT 2 .1S74
February 13, 1974
CHINO BASIN~
MUNICIPAL
Sy .. Vv /.'• T t= R
DISTRICT
J. ANDREW SCHLANGE
GENERAL MANAGER
TELEPHONE (714) 987-1712
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Attention: Mr. Fred A. Harper
General Manager
Re: Assignment of Certain Agreements Between County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County and Chino
Basin Municipal Water District to the Santa Ana
Watershed Project Authority.
Gentlemen:
On behalf of the Board of Directors of Chino Basin Municipal
Water District, I have been authorized to request that your
Boards of Directors consent to the assignment of the above-
mentioned capacity, treatment and disposal agreements to the
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority. As soon as you have
taken action on this matter, please advise this district
accordingly.
Enclosed are draft copies of the Assignment Agreements for
your approval. As soon as we have your consent, we shall
proceed with execution of the documents.
Very truly yours,
.P'-/I -) ' ,.
~A/t-£_ .. ~ /Jl~,,,.J,n:,~~~-t~_/
Carl B. Masingale, C~rman
Board of Directors-/
CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
/em
Enclosure
8555 ARCHIBALD AVENUE. POST OFFICE BOX 697 • CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91730
----------------~-----.,-.---------------------------------------,_,_ _____________________ __..__.._....___...-
--------------~---............ --------------
CARL B. MASINGALE RAY W. FERGUSON
Pre&ident V ice-Preaident
AGENDA ITEM #12(a)
-------------~---------------------------------------------------
ERNEST L. KEECHLER
Secretar'JI
-fl-
JACK F. COMSTOCK
Director
DICK W. PEHL
Director
DISTRICTS 1,3,5,6,7 & 11
RESOLUTION NO. 74-130
'APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF CBMWD INTERCEPTOR
CAPACITY AGREEMENT TO SAWPA
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 3, 5,
6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING ASSIGNMENT BY DISTRICT NO. 2 OF
CHINO BASIN WASTE WATER INTERCEPTOR CAPACITY
AGREEMENT TO SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJ~CT
AUTHORITY
* * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, the Chino Basin Municipal Water District has requested
assignment of the Waste Water Interceptor Capacity Agreement with
County Sanitation District No. 2, dated April 12, 1972, to the Santa
Ana Watershed Project Authority, which said Authority was formed for
the purpose of undertaking projects for water quality control and
protection, and pollution abatement in the· Santa Ana River Watershed;
and,
WHEREAS, the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction
Agreement between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7 and 11,dated March 10, 1971; as amended, provides that each
Sanitation District, which is a party thereto, must approve ~he
use of joint treatment and disposal facilities or any part thereof
for the disposal of sewage and/or industrial wastes origi~ating
outside the territorial limits of said Districts; and,
WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 2, by Resolution No.
"14-126-2, has approved assignment of the Water Waste Interceptor
Capacity Agreement, subject to approval of Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5,
6, 7 and 11.
NOW THEREFORE,the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER:
Section 1. That certain agreement dated
for assignment to Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority of the
Waste Water Interceptor Capacity Agreement between Chino Basin
Municipal Water District and County Sanitation District No. 2 of
Orange County, dated April 12, 1972, is hereby approved; and,
AGENDA ITEM #12(b) S-1 DISTRICTS 1,3,5,6,7 & 11
Section 2. That the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6,7 and 11, of Orange County, California,
hereby approve the execution of said agreement by County Sanitation
District No. 2, and authorize endorsement thereof by their respective
Chairman and Secretary.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held
October.16, 1974.
-.. .. #
AGENDA ITEM #12(b) S-2 DISTRICTS 1,3,5,6,7 & 11
.._,,.
RESOLUTION NO. 74-131
APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF CBMWD TREATMENT AND
DISPOSAL AGREE~IBNT TO SAWPA
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF CHINO BASIN WASTE
WATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL AGREEMENT TO
SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY
* * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and
11 of Orange County have heretofore entered into a Waste Water
.
Treatment and Disposal Agreement dated April 12, 1972, with Chino
Basin Municipal Water District to permit treatment. and disposal of
waste water from said Water District by means of ·the joint facilities
of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11; and,
WHEREAS, the Chino Basin Municipal Water District has requested
assignment of said agreement to the Santa Ana Watershed Project
Authority, which said Authority was formed for the purpose of
undertaking projects for water quality control and protection,
and pollution abatement in the Santa Ana River Watershed.
NOW THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That certain agreement dated , -----------------------
in form approved by the General Counsel, for assignment to Santa Ana
Watershed Project Authority of the Waste Water Treatment and Disposal
Agreement between Chino Basin Municipal Water District and County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County,
dated April 12, 1972, is hereby approved; and,
Section 2. That the respective Chairmen and Secretary of the
Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7 and 11 are hereby authorized to execute said Agreement on
behalf of their respective Districts.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held
October 16, 1974.
AGENDA ITEM #12(c) -T-ALL DISTRICTS
RESOLUTION NO. 74-140
AMENDING RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATIVE
TO CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT RESOLUTION
NO. 70-3 2 AS AMENDED
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF
DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RULES AND
REGULATIONS RELATIVE TO CONDITIONS OF
EMPLOYMENT RESOLUTION NO. 70-3, AS
AMENDED, RE DEFINITION OF OVERTIME
* * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Section 4 of Resolution No. 70-3, as
·amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows:
and,
"Section 4. If, in the judgment of the General
Manager, or his designee, work beyond the prescribed
workday and/or work week, or work on a paid holiday
or on a regularly scheduled day off, as prescribed
herein, is requi!'ed of an employee, such work will
be considered overtime service and will be compensated
for as provided in Section 16 of the Districts' most
current positions and salaries resolution.
Section 2. That any other resolutions or motions or portions
thereof that conflict.herewith are hereby repealed and made of
no further effect.
AGENDA ITEM #1!~ -U-ALL DISTRICTS
MEETING DATE Oc t o ber 1 6 . 1974 TIME 7:30 p .m. DISTRICTS 1 ,2 ,3 ,5,6 ,7 ,8 & 1 1
DISTRICT 1 C\(<:.) 13(0.l
~GARTH~) ••••• PATTERSON •••• ~___:::__±____
CLARK) •••••• BATTIN ••••••• ~±-.__±___
RIMA •••••• ••• _9::::::-~ _-3::__
(LANGLEY) •••• SALTARELLI ••• ___1::::... ~ ...±..._
DISTRICT 2
E.WI NGl • • • • · ·CHAPUT •••••• ~ _+_ --=
L lS • • • • • ·CALLAHAN· • • • · __L.. _+_ ~
BA ER • • • • • ·CLARK • • • • • • · ~ ~ ~ PATTE~SON) • ·GARTHE •• •• • • · V _t__ _:t__
NEVI~) •••••• GRAHAM······· .......J:::::.: _T_---=
THOM) •• • • • ·KAYWOOD. •• • • · v ..::t__ _-r_
FOX) ••• ·.··MAC KAIN .. •••• V--+ -------PERRY •••••••. ~.±___---=
!STANTON) SCOTT········~---=--=
PEREZ · • ••• TEMPLE •• • • • • • __L_ -+ DUNN~~ •• • ••• WINN • •• • • • • • ~ -+ ...:t..._
ROOT) ••••••. WQOD ••• • •• • • ~ _-r _ _±__
DISTRICT 3
!
MAC KAIN_). ···FOX···· • • • • • • ~ _+ _ _±_
NUIJENS)····ARBISO ······· ~ _+ __ +_
CLARK)······BATTIN······· ~ _T_ .±__
MC KNEW).··· ·BLACKMAN·····~ i_ --=.
COLLINs) •••• BYRNE········~ _:±__ .:±__
CULVER······· ~ ..±...__. _+_
(MEYER) • • • • • ·DAVIS···· • • • • V-....::t__ _:t__
EDWARDS · • • • • • ~ ...±____ -(PATT~RSON) •. GARTHE·······~ _+_ T
(THOM)·······KAYWOOD······ \/""" _+_ .±...___ ........ cox . . . . . . . . . ~ t -+
!yr· ·NG).···· ·NEVIL·· .. •••· ,_,..--+----::::: W ~D) • • • • • • ·ROOT· • • • • • • • • ~ --+-~
LACAYo) ••••• soNJU········ Q_. ()...... a.....
SCOTT) • • • • • • SVA LS Tld) • • • • • V------
COEN) .. •••• ·WIEDER······· ~ ~ -t
DISTR1 CT 5
JOINT BOARDS
(DUNNE) • • • • • • WINN • • • • • • • • _lL_
NUIJENS) • • • • ARB ISO · • • · · ·• v -
CLARK) • • • • • • BAKER • • • • • • · 0--==
CLARK) • • • • • • BATTIN • • • • • • V'
MC KNl;W) • • • • • BLACKMAN • • • • __L._ --
PRYOR) • • • • • • BURTON • • • • • • ~ --
COLL 1 Is) · · · . BYRNE ••••••• _L_ ==
L VONS • • • • • • CALLAHAN • • • • v--
EWING .• • • • • • CHAP UT • • • • • ·--;:::::---
BAKER • • • • • • CLARK .········ Cv --
CULVER • • • • • • --V --~MEYER) DAVIS · • • • • • · 1,......-: --
MC IN.NIS). • •• DOSTAL ••••. ·~~
COEN) ••••••. DUKE ••••••.•. ___i.::::.::_ ~3 "1 1 lD
EDWARDS •••• ·~ --
(MAC KAIN)···· FOX··.-••.••• ·~ --
(PATTERSON) • • GARTHE • • .••. ~ --
(COEN) ·······GIBBS •• ·• • • ·--1::::::... ==
GLOC KNER .•• ·--1..L.
~NEVIL) •••••• GRAHAM ••••• ·~ --
PEREf:) • • • • • • JACKMA'N • • • • • ~ --
THOM) ••••••• KAYWOOD •••• ·---1:::::::::: ==
. . ....... cox . . . . . . . . ~
l F 0 X J • • • • • • • • MAC KA I N • • • • • ,,.----
RY CK Of F) •••• ~€ IPH4 HJ. I • I --
YOUNG) ••.••• NEVIL ••••..•. ~ --
GARTHE) ••••• PATTERSON •. ·~ --
p E RR Y • • • · • • · --1::::::::... --.
· RIMA· •• • •• •. ~ --
R96EuRS 0 I I --------
. (wooD) ••••••• ROOT •••••••• ::= --
!LANGLEY) • • • . SAL TAR ELLI • .---1:::::::_ --
STANTON) • •• • SCOTT · •••• • .---1L. --
LACAYO) ••••• SONJU •••.••• a_, --
MC INN.Is)·· • • STORE • • • · • · .----
SCOTT) • • • ••• S.V ALSTAD • • • · ,_.. --
~PERE~) • • • • • · TEMPLE • • · • • • i.< --
COEN • • ••••• WI EDER ••. •. '--k::: -
ROOT • • •• · •• WOOD • • · • • • · • v----------
(BAKER) • • • • • ·CLARK ··· • · · · · --9.L_ ----fY'..e rvv--' (RYCKOfF) ····MC INNIS • • • • • ~ ----~ * * * * * * * * *
ROGERS ••.••.. ~ ----OTHERS
DISTRICT 6
RIMA·········~ _Q::_ ___2:::_
(CLARK) •• • • • -BATTIN· ~"t"; ~ _-r_ 2--
(MC INNIS).·· .STORE········~ _;-_ _:t_
DISTRICT 7
l LANGL~Y) •••• SALTARELLI ••• ~ ~ __±.___
PRYOR • • • • • 0 B URTON· • • • • •• ~ ...:t_ _;-_
BAKER ••• ... CLARK········ CL.. ~ ~--(C -J-
MC INNIS) •••• DOSTAL·· •• ••• ~ _:t.__ ~..,r; ri.n"'
GLOCKNER····· V----...:t__ ...±__
(PEREZ) •••••• ~A~·····-~---=-~
(GARTHE) ••••• PATTERSON •••• ~--=-_±.__
Dl RICT 11
(COEN) ·······DUKE·········~~~
(CLAR K)···· ··BAKER········ 0....-~ ~
(COEN) ·······GIBBS········~ _:t__ __.±.__
DISTRICT 8
MITCHELL· • • • • _k:::: ---1 (BAKER) • • • • • ·CLARK · • • • • • • • ~ --__ "j\.O~\.u.:vv-'
(JOHNSON) ····HOLM ·········~ ---0
1 0/1 6/74
HARPER
SYLVESTER
LEWI S
CLAR KE
TAYLO R
BROWN
NISSON
EWING
HOH EN ER
HOWARD
HUNT
KEITH
KENNEY
LYNCH
MADDOX
MARTINSON
PIERSALL
STEVENS
ACTION TAKEN BY J OINT BOARDS RE AGENDA ITEM NO . 13 CONCERNING
ACQUISI TI ON OF PROPERTY IM ME DI ATE LY ADJACENT T0 1 TREATMENT
PLANT NO . 2 :
13(a) ~e"8iW. appraisal rep ort dated August 13, 1 974,
on the 8-acre parcel of property located adjacent
to the northerly Treatment Plant No . 2 property
line (Covington a nd Ayres parce l ) prepared by
Everett S . Schmid , Real Es tat e Appraiser ; and ,~ ytJMlttf/~
authorized the staff to negotiate with t he
prope r ty owner for purchase of t he 7 .168-acre
parcel (Covington parcel).
~ ~1 ei .,~ fi~,~~ ~~i ~ .. L---µ . JP) LJ
"" ~~....,..: -~-'I-_ -~ ~ ~t.~ ~ ,,..~T, .. ~.:fk 1/r:;:;;;:~t ·~ ~' ,.,..__._n ,,...J J'L-:Ve::::LJ ~ ,,.._u e.,.l.P ~ • ...l..J-tl-( 13 (b) ~ Aµproved appraisal rep ort dated J u ly 29 , 19 7 4 , on
the 3-acre parcel located adjacent to the south-
westerly corner of Treatment Plant No . 2 , prepared
by Everett S . Sch mid , Real Estate Appraiser ; and J <i=t Pv1r.f7~.ry, {.,(,.,-~U)J
authori zed the staff to negotiate with the property
owner for acquisiti on of said parce l (Rinker parcel).
·~
ACTION TAKEN BY JOINT BOARDS RE AGENDA ITEM NO. 13 CONCERNING
ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO TREATMENT
PLANT NO. 2:
13(a) Approved appraisal report dated August 13, 1974,
on the 8-acre parcel of property located adjacent
to the northerly Treatment Plant No. 2 property
line (Covington and Ayres parcel) prepared by
Everett S. Schmid, Real Estate Appraiser; and
authorized the staff to negotiate with the
property owner for purchase of the 7.168-acre
parcel (Covington parcel).
13(b) Approved appraisal report dated July 29, 1974, on
the 3-acre parcel located adjacent to the south-
westerly corner of Treatment Plant No. 2, prepared
by Everett S. Schmid, Real Estate Appraiser; and
authorized the staff to negotiate with the property
owner for acquisition of said parcel (Rinker parcel).
October 1 6 , 1974 Joint Mtg .
Report of the Joint Chairman
Regarding the Sept. 25th Open House, the Joint Chairman reported a
total of 92 elected officials and city administrative staff attended.
There were a number of State legis l atures to attend but the Governer
called a special meeting that day so were unable to attend . Men tioned
letter received from Senator Whetmore. Winn said cong ratulati ons
should go to staff.
Report of the General Manager
FAH reported on meetings in Denve r. Said at one of the lunche ons had
Assistant Administrator of EPA for Water and Hazardous Materials .
They are doing some thinking and administration is looking for some
ways to cut some of their programs. Looking at water pollution
program to see where they can cut what they have already agreed to.
One thing that came out of survey was that original ly cost was to be
$1 8 bi l l i on . Afte r two years based on federal law, survey is now up
to $340 billion. Puts the whole thing out of site . Have had some
hearings before Senate and House Committees involved with water pollu-
tion control matters. EPA is considering rec omm ending to t he
administration that they propose l egislation for a "b uy out" program ,
which would mean they would spend maybe $1 1 0 mil l ion for next 10 years
and then say it is up to local communities. Local communit i es are
strapped to even provide the kind of service expected . Mentioned
another area EPA has some difficulty on is requirements. Said we
commented and objected to 85% BOD & chlorination requirement and now
find that because of chlorination requirement, have driven price of
chlorine out of sight. Local communities having a terr i ble time even
getting the material. We have not had to comply with numbers that
many of the entities have already been complying with. Said another
problem is their excess capacity--amount of capacity in a treatment
plant that is going to be constructed--whether for 10 or 20 years growth .
This is being administrated in an inconsistent manner. Different rules
but spending same money . Another problem area is user charge situati on
where General Accounting Office has ruled out ad valorem taxes as
means of getting revenue . We would spend $1/2 million per District
on another kind of collection program . Admini stration is going t o
Congress and ask that that be changed immediately and will have some
leg islation also they will be proposing in the new Congress having to
do with discharges to marine environment. Said they couldn't agree
among themselves in group appointed by Russell Train . They made an
EPA option paper--gave recomm endat ion of three or four things .
Regarding secondary treatment requir ement for ocean dischargers, in
five or ten years from now, when federal money is all spent , they
may decide that we have to do it so we oppose that concept .
Mr . Harper said that in AMSA meeting we proposed that a new le gislative
committe e be set up representing the major entities throughout the
United States. Said they went for this idea and listed representative s
that would be in this group . The purpose of the group will be to
bring together the le gis lators who are represented and d iscuss the
individual problems. This will be the beginning of getting something
done. Said the key to any changes in the Wa ter Pollution Control Act
is in the Senat e , n ot on the House side . Is a chance that Senator
Muskie may move out of the position of handling the subcommittee that
handles the environmental problem . He is chairman of another committ ee
and has to get out of one of them. FAH said we will be working with
SWRCB to come up with new numb ers as to what the true costs are .
Report of the General Cou n sel
Nisson said he spent time reading extensive discuss~on of l ast mon t h 's
me etin g . Have done some work on contracts and said most of wha t he
h ad to say would come up und er item #1 3 .
Golden West Fertilizer
Kaywood asked if we reject this proposal, what kind of better offer
do we get? FAH said that we had no better offer at the present time .
Said it was his understanding that the current contractor will then
request to terminate the agreement with us. We have use of his
equipment for a period of 90 days. Kaywood then asked if there was
any other means? FAH said we will have to i nvest igate.
Security Monitoring System
Question was asked if we have had any problems that have promulgated
this? Was answered , yes, we have had two problems in the last 8 months .
Winn asked Director Temple if he would assist the staff in obtaining
these proposals as his job is buying this type of equipment . Said
he would.
(9c) Change Orders under $25,000
Byrne asked if resolution included the total paragraph as found in
the Executive Committee report which is more than in the agenda--that
all items that are not a necessity will come before us and we will
receive monthly reports. REL answered .that resolution stipulates any
unforeseen work but will bring to you. Was asked what time period
was--could they need $25,000 one day and another $25,000 another day?
Ray answered not in any one instance. Action has to be taken at
that particular time. Usually is 4-5 weeks before being able to
bring them back to the Board . This is limitation placed on Dept . of
Transportation. This $25,000 is if they don't anticipate it.
Byrne then asked if we could have resolution include the entire
paragraph--staff report that covers the handling of non-emergency
items plus progress reports on emergency items? Nissan stated that
we wouldn't want it part of this resolution but could make it a
motion in addition to resolution.
Root asked when you do approve something, does this eventually get
back to the Board for at least recognition by the Board. FAH said
they are placed in a monthly progress report to District so Directors
could see.
Kaywood then asked what would happen in the event there would be som e
kind of emergency where it would exceed $25,000. Nissan said we
would call a special Board meeting or staff would act and hope the
Board would ratify it. Mr . Harper added that what we have done in
the past on these situations was generally to cal l the Chairman and
discuss seriousness of it and consequences.
Scott said he wanted a point of information. Since we have been
operating without this policy in the past, have we had that many
problems? Winn advised that the $25,000 amount is the standard amount
that the Dept. of Transportation uses. Ray described some recent
p ~oblems that we have had where we have had to almost shut job down
and have had to authorize contractor to operate on a force account
basis or enter into another agreement for method of payment and hope
that Board would ratify our actions. Said our construction program
is at an all-time high so situations occur more often. Scott then
asked if the Board had ever not ratified what was asked for and REL
said not to his knowledge.
Temple asked what was wrong with hoping and praying the Board would
ratify actions? Doesn 't that make you think a little more? Said
he thought that process being used such as contacting the Chairman
of the District keeps Directors involved.
Store questioned what would happen in the absence of the General
Manager. Assumed that same process would be employed as for more
than $25,000.
Called for the question.
MacKain said he agreed with what is being asked for here but should
be in the form of a percentage.
-2 -
/
(13a)
I
(13b)
Ray answered that he had contemplated $25.,000 or 1% of contract , but
for a $60,000 contract, would be more than 1% of contract. Cost on
$60,000 contract is the same as $5,000,000 project. Oniy reason for
$25,000 is that it is standard in other Standard Specifications .
Nisson added that the nature of change orders are unforeseen or
unanticipated conditions. These type of change o r ders can't lend
themselves to a percentage of the contract . Are usually under $25 ,0 00
and said that was why he thought that a "fixed figure is most desirable
rather than percentage.
Arbiso commented that he thought the motion is practical. Only right
and proper that the General Manager be held responsible for all .
actions. Said none of us a r e technically know ledgable to question.
CALLED FOR THE QUESTION.
Roll Call vote. Did not pass.
Winn asked whether the General Manager should suggest a lower amount
if Directors desired.
Duke stated that staff has been doing this and if we as a Board feel
staff has overwritten the contract, we will have to accept the
liability. Winn asked Duke if he would vote against it in any amount
and Duke answered, yes .
Nevil suggested that in Section 1 that the words "without Board approval"
might be added. Said he didn't know if that would make it acceptable
or not.
Winn then advised that the General Manager had asked that this item
be withdrawn.
Nissen added that the Directors should consider that by not establishing
any procedure that they authorized the staff that there is no limit
at this time . If you set forth $25,000 that they must come to the
Board for, then you have reduced your liability.
Winn then stated that unless there were some objections from Directors,
this item will be considered tabled .
Acquisition of 8 -acre parcel of property
The Chair entertained a mbtion on the 7~ acre parcel known as th e
Covington Parcel to accept appraisal as submitted and authorize staff
to negotiate to acquire property. It was so moved and seconded.
Motion carried. No votes to be recorded: Nevil, Chaput, Temple,
Perez, and ~. '(v..e ~
Acquisition of 3-acre parcel
It was then moved and seconded to accept appraisal and authoriz e
negotiation to acquire 3-acre parcel. Roll Call vote. Motion
carried . Chaput requested that his no vote be recorded. Dostal abstained .
Winn sai d that the Counsel advised that it would be in the best
int e rest of the District to coordinate with the Ci t y of Huntington
Beach after the property was acquired .
Substitute subcontractor for Pl-16
is s on reported subcontractor cannot enter the proposed agreement
and subcontractor not licensed in California . Motions carried.
Rejection of bids re J -6-l
REL reported that one bid was received for $1~600,000+. Said in
the evaluation of the engineer 's proposal, felt that perhaps th e
rejecting of this bid and with the authority for the staff and Genera l
Manager to ne g otiat e and other items could be contracted on a bid
-3-
basis, felt that amount on bid could substantially be reduced .
Don't know what reduced amount wou l d be at this time .
(23) DIST . 2 -Other business
Chaput stated that he thought we should look back into District 2's
annexation costs in conjunct i on with Reach 3 of the Santa Ana River
Interceptor.
Winn asked if we didn 't have an annual review and FAH answered that
we have an annual escalation but not an annual review. Thought that
request is a good one as : we haven 't looked at the whole picture for
a long time . Winn then asked if staff would like to have some of
the Directors get together with them. Mr . Harper said they would get
some numbers ~ogether first .
It was moved and seconded to direct staff to look into this.
(41) Report re Master Plan facilities
Conrad Hohener referred to map and schedule in folders. Currently
have $10,135,000 under construction. Reviewed various Master Plan
facilities and costs. In the l ast three or four months price of pipe
has increased over 70%. Pipe constitutes about 40% of contract cost .
10% is other costs and 50% for labor. Remainder of construction
comes up to $26,738,000. Average family spends $50 for Sanitation
Districts services.
Root asked if we anticipate any rebudgeting. FAH said we will budget
the work depending on financial capacity of the Dis t rict.
~) Requests of Cypress & Buena Park
REL reported that in November of last year we rece i ved letters from
Buena Park and Cypress requesting additional lines to accommodate
deve l opment in their cities. Buena Park wanted sewer in La Palma Ave.
and Crescent Ave. This is a sewer that the City needed for their own
facilities. The staff feels that the District developed a Master Plan
and a certain criteria of the area that we wou l d serve. Do not fe e l
that the request from Buena Park falls within criteria established
by Board so would not recommend that that sewer be constructed by
Sanitation District and incorporated within our system.
Request from Cypress is for sewer in Katella Ave . extending up
easterly past Walker Street to serve a proposed industrial development
in that area. Fee l we should incorporate that in our system. Feel
it does fit within our criteria. Can go both ways on alignment. New
alignment would move trunk sewer 1/4 mile closer to area they need
to serve. Will not change the operation of our system . Cost is about
the same. Will be more pavement replacement one way and need
acquisition of right of way the other way .
Recommendation is deny request from Buena Park and adopt alignment
suggested to accommodate City of Cypress.
-4-