The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1974-10-0211 COUNTY SANIT ATION" .. DlSTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNrfY,.:cJ\.l1FORNIA TELE PH ON ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 ------··---·--------.... ·-······------~-. -------------- P. 0. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) Gentlemen: September 26, 1974 NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING DISTRICT NO. 2 WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 2, 1974, 7:30 P.M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting held September 11, 1974, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 will meet in an adjourned regular meeting at th.e above hour and date. JWS:rb MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Colifomia DISTRICT NO. _2 _ Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Teleprcnes: Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 ~===#========================================================================= II Adjourned Regular Meeting October 2, 1974 -7:30 p.m. No. 3 -Review of the District's Master Plan of Inter- ceptor Sewers. The staff will report on the construction program to date and give an over-all review of the future construction required to complete the District's Master Plan and its relationship to the needs of the various communities in the upper portion of the District .. . • No. 4 -Capacities and Design Ciiteria for the Santa Ana River Interceptor -La Palma and Grove Streets, Anaheim, to the Orange County Boundary. Included with the agenda material is a staff report relative to the sizing of the Santa Ana River Interceptor to the County boundary. ~'<··· No.··&-: Request of ~naheim Hills, Inc., for Anneiation of 63 Acres of Territory to the District. The staff report included in the agenda material recommends the approval of the Anaheim Hills Inc., annexation request subject to specific conditions, as it conforms to the densities anticipated in the District's Master Plan of Trunk Sewers. No. 8 ·-Approval of Assignment of Agreements. The Chino Basin Municipal Water District has requested assign- ment of their agreements with District No. 2 and the Joint Boards for wastewater interceptor capacity and wastewater treatment and dis- posal capacities to the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA). SAWPA is a joint powers authority whose member~ are, the Chino Basin Municipal Water District, the Orange County Water District, Western Municipal Watet District and the San Bernardino Municipal Water Dis- trict. This agency has been established to construct the Upper Basin wastewater collection and disposal facilities and is recognized by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Environmental Protection I / Agency as the contracting agent for the Upper Basin. It is therefore recommended that the assignment agreement be approved i n form acceptable to the General Counsel. Fred A. Harper General Manager I AGENDA ITEM NO, 6(A) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT S S T A F F R E P 0 R T September 26, 1974 o f ORANGE C OUNTY, C ALIFOR N IA P. 0 . BOX 8127 10 844 ELLI S AVEN U E FOU NTAIN V ALLE Y, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71 4) 540-29 10 (7 14 ) 962-24 1 1 Subject: Proposed Annexation to Sanitation District No. 2 (Designated as Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 2) Th~ staff has reviewed the request by Anaheim Hills, Inc. and Texaco Ventures, Inc. for the annexation of 63 acres adjacent to Anaheim Hills Annexation No. l as shown in four separate parcels on the map attached herewith. The proposed development is consistent with the land use maps included in the Interim Master Plan Report of Trunk Sewer Facilities for Sanitation District No. 2. The capacities have been provided for in the proposed development and it is hereby recommended that the annexation be approved and included in the conditions that were i mposed on Anaheim Hills Annexation No. l (Ref. Resolution No. 72-46-2). These.conditions are as fol lows: ... Section 5. That said annexations (Anaheim Hills Annexations Nos. 1 and 2) shall be subject to the following: (2) That the maximum flow acceptable from the area proposed to be annexed shall not exceed 350,000 gallons per day to be· discharged during dail y low flow periods as determined by the Districts' engineers until such time as facilities are constructed to relieve the system; and, (3) That temporary facilities required to serve the area proposed to be a nn exed sha l 1 be installed and maintained at no cost t o the Di s trict; and, Section 6. That the Ci t y of An a heim be urged to explore the f easibility of requiring installation of low volume plumbing fixtures in the area proposed to be a nnexed. REL:hje .~. i r · ') anat1Eim hills, inc • .&-...:... ·--~~~ A Subsidiary of Grant Corporation July 29 I 1974 FILED Board of Directors In the Office of the Secrntary County Sanitation District No 1... Orange County Sanitation District Number 2 10844 Ellis Avenue AUG 1 4 1974 Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 r--.....~ .. ·~,_ By' l: .... c---, ~'-• .... ~...)....- Attention: Mr. Fred Harper General Manager Sl:Jbject: Request for Annexation into Sanitation District Number 2 Gentlemen: _,, . ,, - Anaheim Hills Incorporated and Texaco Ventures, Incorporated, respectfully request the annexation of 630 03 acres, as described in the attached map and legal description into Sanitation District Number 2.. Also enclosed is a check in the amount of $32 5. 00 to cover the filing fee. We understand that the present fee for annexation into Sanitation District Number 2 is $428.00 per acre for a total of $26,977 .OOo We further understand that the fee charged by the State Board of Equa Ii zation for this action is $180. 00 for the first parcel, plus $30. 00 for each additional parcel for a total of $270. 00 for the four parcels includedo These fees will be paid at the time requested by the respective agencies. At the time of Anaheim Hills first request for annexation (Annexation Noo 1) into Sanitation District Number 2, the then existing Agricultural Preserve prevented extending the boundaries to some areas which would otherwise have been included. However, since the expiration of the Agricultural Preserve Agreement, we are now preparing more specific plans to complete the development. in these areas. Figure 1, attached hereto, shows the present bounda_ries of Sanitation District Number 2 and the four parcels requested to be annexedo You wi II note that the boundaries of parcels 2, 3, and 4 are also the boundaries for future open space or park use. Parcel 1, as shown, is a small island bordered by the boundaries of Sanitation District Number 2 and the Southern California Edison Company Easement. 380 ANAHEIM HILLS ROAD. ANAHEiM, CALIFORNIA 92806, PHONE (714) 998-2000 Page Two . Orange County Sanitation District Number 2 Mr. Fred Harper July 29, 1974 Since the filing for Anaheim Hills Annexation Number 1, more detailed planning of development has defined a reduction i.n the total number of living units to be constructed. This decreases the demand for capacity in the District's sewer system as compared with the estimates presented for Annexation No 0 1 . Table 1 shows the tabulation of living units, by area 6 as originally submitted, representing a total of 1, 137 single-family units (S-.F.U .) and 1,982 multiple-family units (M. F. U.) . Table 2 presents the distribution of living units as presently contemplated. Single-family units have been increased to 1 ;490, whereas multiple-family units have been decreased to 1, 163. These totals includeq 57 S.F.U. and 213 MoF.U. within the proposed annexation. A comparison of these two tables indicates a small decrease in proposed residential sewage after the addition of those parcels in the requested annexation. Please note here that there has been no change in either commercial or recreational use from that proposed under Annexation Number 1. We are aware that the District has expressed concern over the_ capacity of the Olive Sub-Trunk Sewer, which at present is the only downstream outlet from the Anaheim Hills development. It was evident that ultimate development of the initially annexed area would considerably over-tax this sewer. ·Consequently, at the time of our submittal for Annexation Number 111 we supplied information concerning the yearly incremental development expected within the annexed area through January 1978. This was to aid your office in evaluating the effect of Annnexation Number 1 on the Olive Sub-Trunk Sewer until such time as the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer was constructed. Since that time, we find that the yearly unit-completion estimates were high. Table 3 shows a comparison between the present estimate for units to be occupied by January 1975 versus our previous estimate. We are submitting data to this date only, since we have been recently informed by your office that completivn of the Interceptor Sewer is expected before the end of the 1974 ca lender year. · We are also transmitting 0 for your review, a copy of the Environmental Impact Report for the Anaheim Hills Development. This report, adopted by the City of Anaheim in the latter part of 1972, was written on the entire Noh I Ranch. The report is in conformance with all state and local legislation guidelines and Page Three ,.... Orange County Sanitation District Number 2 Mr. Fred Harper July 29, 1974 procedures.. As such, it is a valid representation of the environmental considerations for the overal I project and so covers any action requiring an Environmental Impact Report. This procedure is presently being used by the City of Anaheim in actions involving the Local Agency Formation Commission concerning the annexation of areas of Anaheim H ii Is into the City of Anaheim. Your assistance in this matter is greatly appreciated and if .you should need any additional information, please feel free to contact our engineer Mr. Don Seitz (714-· 774-5740) or myself. EB: hjp Enclosures J. N. 2145 Very truly yours, ANAHEIM HILLS, INC. Erik Berg Vice President -·-1 ·---· LEGEf'll PARK OR OPEN SPACE PROPOSED ANAHEIM HILLS ANNEXATION NO 2 DEVELOPE MENT ARE A (SEE TABLES) BOUNDARY OF ANArlE 1M HILL S ANNEXATIONS I AND 2 . BOU NDARY OF SANITAT ION DI STR ICT NO. 2 PRIOR TO ANAHEIM HILLS ANNEXATIONS F IGUR E ANAHE IM HILLS ANNEXAT ION NUMBER 2 MEETING DATE Oc tobe r 2 , 1 974 TIME 7 :30 p .m . DISTRICTS 2 ---...,------- DISTRICT 1 (hi0 (~b) ~}JOINT BOARDS . . . (GARTH~).· •••• PATTERSON···· ------(DUNNE) · • • • • • WINN • • • · .•• ". (CLARK) •••••• BATTIN.······ - ---NUIJE~S) ····ARB ISO···· ... --- . RIMA.········ ------CLARK ······BAKER • • • • • • · --- (LANGLEY) •••• SALTARELLJ ••• -----CLARK ·······BATTIN •••••• --- D f'l--j · MC KNf;.W) • • • • • BLACKMAN • • • • ---- ISTR ICT 2 ~ .7 PRYOR) ...... BURTON ...... -.--- f"'lNGi ······CHAPUT .••••• _v _ __ __ COLLI1S) .... BYRNE·······~== L_J NS •••••• CALLAHAN ••••• _v ______ LYONS • • • • • • CALLAHAN • • • • ___ _ BAKER •••••• CLARK ••••••• _./ ______ EWING ······CHAPUT······--__ PATTE~SON) •• GARTHE.. • • • ./ ____ ___,.:_BAKER • • • • • • CLARK .········--__ NEVIL.) •..••• GRAHAM·'/.? ••. -r __ CULVER ...... ___ _ THOM) •••••• KAYWOOD...... ./ --. {MEYER) . DAVIS • • • • • • ·--· __ . FOX) ••••••• ~·, ••. ~ -----MC INNIS) .. ~· DOSTAL ...... ___ _ PERRY •.•••••• ----;:;-----COEN) • · • • • • • DUKE •••.••.•• ___ _ !STANTON) SCOTT •••••.•• ----r------EDWARDS • • • • ·--__ PEREZ) .•••• TEMPLE ••••••. --r ------\MAC KAIN)·· • • FOX • • •·• •·• · • ·--__ DUNNg) •••••• WINN •••••••• -/------(PATTERSON) • • GARTHE • • · • • ·-·-__ · _ ROOT) ••••••• wooo .••••••• -.,/------(coEN) ••••••• GIBBS ••••••• __ -- ~~--~~-~-~----=--=-.::-..::-_-_-:..-==---GLOCKNER •••• DISTRICT 3 ! MAC KAIN_).··· FOX·········· ------ NU I JENS) • • • ·ARB IS 0 • • • • • • • ------ CLARK)····· ·BATTIN······· ------ MC KNEW).··· ·BLACKMAN····· ----__ COLLINS)··· ·BYRNE········ ----__ CULVER··· .. ·• ----__ (MEYER)····· ·DAVIS········ ----__ EDWARDS· • • • · · _____ _ PATT~RSON) • ·GARTHE • • • • • • · _____ _ THOM) • • • • • • ·KAYWOOD· • • • • • COX) • · · · • · · ·LONG· · · • · · · · · ,. ING)····· ·NEVIL········ ------ WoO D) • • • • • • ·ROOT • • • • • • • • • ------ LACAYO) • • • • • SONJU • • • • • • • • ------ SCOTT) •••••• sVALSTAD • • • • ·==== ==== ==== COEN)······ ·WI EDER······· _____ _ DISTRICT 5 (RYCKOfF) ····MC INNIS • • • • • ------ (BAKER)····· ·CLAR K········ ------ ROGERS· • • • • • • ----__ DISTRICT 6 RIMA········· ------ (CLARK) •• ···.BATTIN ··· • • •. ----__ (MC INNIS) •••• STORE ·.· •• • •. --___ _ DISTRICT 7 l LANGL~Y) •••• SALTARELLI· •• ------ PRYOR • ··.·.BURTON·· •• • •• ------ BAKER •••••• CLARK· ••••••• ------ MC INNIS) •••• DOSTAL·······------ GLOCKNER ••••. ------ (PERE Z) •••••• JACKMAN •••••• ------ (G"RTHE) ••••• PATTERSON.· •. ------ DfSTRlCT 11 !COEN) • • ·····DUK E · • • • • • • • • ------ CLAR l<) ······BAKER ········ ------ COEN)······ ·GIBBS ········ _____ _ DISTRICT 8 MITCHELL·····------ (BAK ER) ······CLARK ········ ----- (JOHNSON) ····HOLM········· ------ 9/11/74 NEVIL) •••••• GRAHAM •••••• ---- PEREi) • • • • • • JACKMAN ••••• ---- THO!) ••••••• KAYWOOD ••••• ---- COX ...••... LONG ••...... ---- FOX .•••.••• MAC KAIN •..•• ---- RYCKOfF) • ••• MC INNIS •••.• ---- (YOUNG) .•. • •• NE VIL .•• ., ••• ---- (GARTHE) ••••• PATTERSON ••• ---- PERRY ••••••. ----. RI MA ••..•.•• ---- ROGERS •••••• ---- WOOD) • • • • • •• ROOT •••••..• ---- LANGLEY) • • • • SALTARELLI • .--- STANTON) • • • • SCOTT •••.••• ---- LACAYO) • •• •• SONJU ••••••• ---- MC I NNI s) •• •• STORE ••••••• ---- SCOTT) •• • •• • SVALSTAD .• · .---- { PEREl) • • • • • • TEMPLE • • • • • .---- COEN • · •. • •• WI EDE R •••••• --- ROOT • · •..•• WOOD .••••••• ---- OTHERS * * * * * * * * * HARPER SYLVESTE R LEWI S CLARKE TAYLO R BROWN NISSON EWING HOH EN ER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVEN S --v - ..... .-... iW' ~ MEETING DATE October 2, 1974 TIME 7:3 0 p.m. DISTRICTS --------2 DISTRICT 1 (GARTHE). · •••• PATTERSON •••• ___ _ (CLARK) •••••• BATTIN ••••••• - - - RIMA......... __ _ (LANGLEY) •••• SALTARELLI ••• ---_ DISTRICT 2 E' -Gl ······CHAPUT ······· ~ ---- L.: NS •••••• CALLAHAN· • • • • ~ ---- BAKER •••••• CLARK • • • • • • • _.i.::::::::_ --PATTE~SON) •• GARTHE • • • • • • • ~ ---- NEVIL.) •••••• GRAHAM······· / --- THOt'\) •••••• KAYWOOD· • • • • • ~ ___ _ FOX) ....... MAC l<AIN-• • .. • \,.....----__ PERRY ••• ~ • • • • 0..- 1 STANT1N) SCOTT........ / ---- PERE:l;· .•••• TEMPLE· • • • • • • \/ ___ _ DUNNE •••••• WINN • • • • • • • • \..--___ _ ROOT) ••••••• WOOD • • • • • • • • __;::::::_ ___ _ DISTRICT 3 !MAC KA IN)· • • ·FOX· • • • • • • • • • ------ NU I JENS) • • • ·ARB I SO • • • • • • • ----- CLARK)····· ·BATTIN······· ------ MC KNEW).·· -'·BLACKMAN····· ------ COLLI NS) • • • ·BYRNE· • • • • • • • ----- CULVER······· ----- (MEYER) •• • • • • DAVIS· • • • • • • • ----__ EDWARDS······ --___ _ PATTERSON)·· GARTHE • • • • • • · --___ _ THOM) • • • • • • ·KAYWOOD· • • • • • --___ _ er'') ..... · · ·LONG· · • · • · · · · Y -N~) •••••• NEVIL········------ WOOD)····•·· ROOT ········· ------ LACAYO)· • • • • SONJU • • • • • • • • ------ SCOTT)····· 0 SVALSTAD· • • • • ------ COEN) ••••••• WIEDER·······======== DISTRICT 5 (RYCKOfF) ····MC INNIS • • • • • ----- (BAKER)····· ·CLARK········ ----__ ROGERS· • • • • • • --___ _ DISTRICT 6 JOINT BOARDS (DUNNE) ······WINN • • • • • • • • NUIJE~S) ····ARB ISO • • • • •·• --- CLARK • • • • • • BAKER • • • • • • • --- CLARK ·······BATTIN·····.--- MC KN~W) • • • • • BLACKMAN • • • • ---- PRYOR) • • • • • • BURTON • • • • • • -.--- COLLI JS) • • • • BYRNE • • • • • • • == == LYONS • • • • • • CALLAHAN • • • • EWING .• • • • • • CHAPUT • • • • • • ---- . BAKER • • • • • • CLARK • • • • • •· • ---- CULVER • • • • • .---- !MEYER) DAVIS • • • • • • .---- MC IN.NIS) •• ·~.DOSTAL ••••• ·== == COEN) ••••••• DUKE ••••••.•• EDWARDS ••••• ---- (MAC KAIN) •••• FOX ••• · ••.•••• ---- (PATTERSON) •• GARTHE • • •••. ---- (COEN) ••••••• GIBBS • • • • • • .-· --- GLOCKNER •••. ---- NEVIL) •••••• GRAHAM •••••• ---- PEREZ) • • •••• JACKMAN • •••• ---- THO~) ••••••• KAYWOOD ••••• ---- COX .•.••... LONG ••...•.. ---- FOX •••••••• MAC KAIN ••••• ---- RYCKOfF) •••• MC INNIS ••••• ---- (YOUNG) •••••• NEV.J L ••••.••. ---- (GARTHE) ••••• PATTERSON ••. ---- PERRY ••••••• ----. RIMA·······.---- ROGERS •••••• ---- WOOD) •• • • ••• ROOT •••••••• ---- LANGLEY) •• •• SALTARELLI •• ---- STANTON) • • • • SCOTT •• • • • •• ---- LACAYO) • • • •• SONJU ••••••• ---- MC INN.IS)·· • • STORE • • • • • •• ---- SCOTT) •• • ••• SVALSTAD • • •• ---- !PEREi) • • • • • ·• TEMPLE • • • • •. ---- COEN • •••••• WI EDER •.•••• --- ROOT •• • • ••• WOOD •••••.•• --- * * * * * * * * * OTHERS Rlr.1A • ••.••.•• ______ -. (CLARK)··· •• -BATTIN ••••••. ____ ~ t •,.. (MC INNIS) •••• STORE •••••••• ____ ---~ ~111 v \_;., HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS CLARKE TAYLOR BROWN DISTRICT 7 !LANGL~Y) •••• SALTARELLI ••• ------ PRYOR ••• ·.-BURTON ••••••• ------ BAKER •••••• CLARK •••••••• ------·· MC INNIS) •••• DOSTAL·.· ••• ·------ GLOCKNER ••••• ------ ( PFREZ) •••••• JACKMAN •••••• ------ ( · :fHE) ••••• PATTERSON •••• --___ _ DISTRICT 11 !COEN)·······DUKE········· CLARtd • • • • • ·BAKER· • • • • • • • --1---~-' COEN)······ ·GIBBS ········--+-----~-· DISTRICT 8 MITCHELL·····------ (BAKER) • • • • • ·CLARK· • • • • • • • ----- (joHNSON) ····HOLM· • • • • • • • • ------ Q /ll /7lJ . -..___./ ' ~ /:" "~·;(L ~,' \ '-I\ \ ' J NISSON EWING HOH EN ER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVENS BOA RDS OF DmECTO n S County Sanitation Districts Post Offi ce Box 8127 10844 Ell is Ave n ue Fountain Valley, C a l if ., 9 2708 Telephones: of Orange County, California II (1 ) ( 2) fllE ···············"( 3 ) t ETTER ···-··- A /C .... TKL R -{ !v) .. ~::: .. ~.-7< "'"••••••h••••••n•.-•••- FILE -:·········-···~ ( R ) ~~-~/-' A/C •... TKLR •••• '--..·-··-···-···- 1--··--(6) FILE ···········-"- LETTER ·····-·- A /C .... TKLR - ·--~~:£ .. ~-- DISTRICT No. 2 ADJOUR NED REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 2 ~ 1974 -7:30 P.M. Ro ll Call Appo intment of Chai rman pro t ern , 1f ne ce ssar y Review of Mast e r Pl an o f t runk s e wers Area Code 7 I 4 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA ADJOURN MENTS PO STED .. :" COMP & MILEAGE ..... !<'.". ... . FILES SET UP .... ~ ............ . RESOLUTIONS CERTIF IED .. :--- LffiERS WRITT EN ...... .<.:'." ..•. MINUTES WRITIEN ..... !-::7: ••• MINUTES HLED ......•• <-::-•••• - Disc u ssion and act i on on s t a ff r eport re design of Santa Ana River I nter ceptor, Re a ch 3 (From La Pa l ma Av enue to Orange Co u n t y l i n e ) See e nc l osure Co n sidera tion of mo t ion authorizing the Ge n e ra l Manager to request a proposal f rom Low r y and Assoc i ates for design of Santa Ana River I nter ceptor , Reach 3 Req u est of Anaheim Hi ll s for annexation of approximate l y 63 ac r es of terr itory to the Dist r ict: )fa-,(" Cons i deration of motion to r eceive and fi l e staf f r epor t re Anaheim Hills ann exation r equest. See enc l osure FILE ···········-_)Jr~C onsiderati on of Standard Reso l ution No . 74 -125-2, ~.!)::~~ 'a uthor~zin g i n itiation of proceeding s to annex Ale .... rm_ · a p p r ox i mate l y 63 . ac r es o f te rri tory to the District ~-5.-~--~~ w( ipthin thdeAAnaheiti:i Hi Nlls , 1 r 0 nc. deve l o p ment area ~ r opose nnexa ion ro . -Anaheim Hills Annexation ~----~~ LETTER •••. -)::! ) A/C .... TKLR ··- .l_~ . .f. ... ~---- I ... --............... ..... FILE ·······--(_~_) LETTER ·······-··- No . 2 to Di s trict No . 2) Consideration of motion to r e ceive and f ile letter from Cr iterion De v elopme nt , I nc . requesting annexat ion o f a pp r oximately 7 acres in the vicini t y o f Moh ler Drive , and r efe r to staff f o r st u dy and r ecomm endation . See p age nA" A/C ····!KLR .!?. ·llo h'~ Consideration of motion to recei ve and file letter fr om Chino Ba s in Mu n icipal Wa t er District, dat ed Feb r uar y 1 3 , 1 974, r e quest ing as s i g nm ent of a g r eem e nts for Wastewa ter I ntercepto r Capac i ty and Wastewa t er Tre atment and Disposal -..-. ..::: .... :.-~ ... -Capacity. See page "B" -········,;·iLE···::::.~:........... pf) LETTE R ··-·-·-- A/C •••. TKLR - Consideration of Reso l ut i on No. 74 -12 6-2 , approvi n g ·asaignme n t o f Wastew~te r Interce ptor Ca pa ci t y Ag reeme nt , in form appr oved b y t he General Counsel, sub je c t t o concurrence o f District s Nos . 1, 3 , 5 , 6, 7 and 11. FILE .••••••.••..•••••• (9.-y LETTER .•.....•..•.•• / A/C ••.. TKLR •••• !---yal (11) See pag e 11 c u Con s ideration of motion approving warrant s .t o be reimbur s ed by the Jo i nt Ope r a ting Fund. See supp l ementa l a g enda Othe r bus iness and commun i c atio ns or s·up pleme ntal a genda i terns , if any Co n s ideration o f mo tion t o a djourn 1 ;D~ CRITERION DEVELOPMENT, INC. REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT & INVESTMENTS 17722 IRVINE BLVD., SUITE 4 TUSTIN, CALIF"ORNIA 92680 ('7141 8:12·3410 Fred Harper General Manager Orange County Sanitation District Number 2 RE: Tract 8713 (Anaheim} Gentlemen: CDHTlllACTCA'8 LICl:N8E •29149& We hereby request annexation of tract No. 8713(Anaheim)° to Orange County Sanitation District No. 2. Said tract is in the City of Anaheim. The tenative ma p has been off~cially approve d b y the Anahei m City Council. We are currently ma king arra ngements with the city to extend the the city sewer main t o our property . Enclose d are two copies of: 1) Legal description 2) Boundary map .3) Land owners petition 4) Tentative map No. 8713 The proj e ct will b e ten hom e s on 1/2 acr e and larg e r lots. FLF /f Enclosure s AGENDA ITEM #7 v~~/~· Frank L. F ehse -A-DISTRICT 2 February 13, 1974 CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL \ • , I --- , ~' /• ... ~ DISTRICT J. ANDREW SCHLANGE GENERAL MANAGER TELEPHONE (714) 987-1712 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Attention: Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager Re: Assignment of Certain Agreements Between County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and Chino Basin Municipal Water District to the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority. Gentlemen: On behalf of the Board of Directors of Chino Basin Municipal Water District, r have been authorized to req~est that your Boards of Directors con~ent to the assignment of the above- mentioned capacity, treatment and disposal agreements to the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority. As soon as you have taken action on this matter, please advise this district accordingly. Enclosed are draft copies of the Assignment Agreements for· your approval. As soon as we have your consent, we shall proceed with execution of the documents. Very truly yours, ~~-'<[ /::,:;· /):"-~ •-"1•; :.' {~·- / Carl B. Masingale, Chairman Board of Directors __ ,., CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT /em Enclosure 8!5!5!5 ARCHIBALD AVENUE . POST OFFICE BOX 697 • CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91730 -----------------------------------------------------------------------r_._--------------------------.._..---------~-------~----------...._ ___________ ..._.._._. __ ........... ____________ ~-------------._._ __ _.... ____________ _ CARL B. MASINGALE Pruide1lt AGENDA ITEM #8(a) RAY W. FERGUSON Vice-Pruident ERNEST L. KEECHLER Secretar11 -B- JACK F. COMSTOCK Director DICK W. PEHL l>irutor ·DISTRICT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 74-126-2 APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF CBMWD INTERCEPTOR CAPACITY AGREEI·iliUT TO SAWPA A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR ASSIGNMENT OF CHINO BASIN WASTEWATER INTERCEPTOR CAPACITY AGREEMENT TO SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County has heretofore entered into a Wastewater Interceptor Capacity Agreement dated April 12, 1972, with Chino Basin Municipal Water District to permit said Water District to dispose of wastewater through the facilities of County Sanitation District No. 2 into the joint treatment and disposal facilities of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11; and, WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County have heretofore approved said agreement with Chino Basin Municipal Water District; and, WHEREAS, the Chino Basin Municipal Water District has requested assignment of said agreement to the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, which said Authority was formed for the purpose of undertaking projects for water quality control and protection, and pollution abatement in the Santa Ana River Watershed. NOW THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 of Orange County, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain agreement dated ------~------------~ for assignment to Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority of the Wastewater Interceptor Capacity Agreement between Chino Basin Municipal Water District and County Sanitation District No. 2 of ·orange County, ·dated April 12, 1972, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That said assignment is subject to the concurrence of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California; and, AGENDA ITEM #8(b) C-1 -DISTRICT 2 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authoirzed to execute said assignment in form approved by the General Counsel. AGENDA ITEM #8(b) C-2 DISTRICT 2 II BOARDS OF DmEC TORS Coun t y Sani tatio n D i!tricts Post Office Box 8 f27 of Oran ge Co unty, Californ ia 10 844 EIHs Ave nue Fou ntain Vall ey,· Calif., 9270 8 Telephones: DIST RI CT No. 2 Area Code 71 4 540-2910 9 62-241 J AGENDA SUPPLEME NTAL AGE NDA ITEMS OCTOBER 2, 1974 -7:30 P.M. (9) Consideration of motion authorizing p~yment fo r guests and participating staff member dinners ~n connection with the open house and plant inspection tour on September 25. (District· No . 2 will be reimbursed by the Joint Operating Fund): WARRANT NO . 23597 IN FAVOR OF Ka l b's Catering Service AMOUNT $732 .73 ·: .. EXCEI\PTS FROM THE r-IINUTES OP TIIE I\EUULAH JOINT MEETING OF THE BOAiillS OF DIFillCTOHS OF COUNTY SANITATIOI~ DISTRICTS N6S. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, OF ORANGE COGN7Y, CALi~0hiiIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of T:30 p.m., September 11 , 19 7 4 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, Califo~pia. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and -the Secretary reported a quorum pres~nt for each District's Board. * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 2 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this. meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., October 2, 1974. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:10 p.m., September 11·, .1974 STATE OF CALIFORNIAl SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 11th day of September 1974 , 11th S-107 IN WITNESS WHEREOF', I have day of September, 1974. this o i 0 .L r e; c :..., 1 ~' l ·• , a tirn1 Dis tric t,3 !\u.::. , 7, and 11