HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-07-10July 3, 1974
NOTICE TO DISTRICT NO. 3 DIRECTORS
SUBJECT: Agenda Item No. 26
Regular Meeting of July 10, 1974
COUNTY SANITAl J DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
P. 0 . BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FO U N TAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92 708
(714) 540-2910
(714 ) 962-2411
Because of the size of the Final Environmental Impact
Report for the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 through 8,
regarding subject agenda item, it is being mailed
herewith under separate cover.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
July 3, 1974
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, AND 11
Gentlemen:
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 11 of Orange
County, California, will be held:
WEDNESDAY EVEN I NG,~ ·JULY· 10; "1974
AT 7:30 P.M.
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
sf)retary
Tentative adjournment prior to next regular meeting:
Executive Committee -July 30, 1974, 5:30 p.m.
SPECIAL NOTICE TO THE DIRECTORS:
As previously reported, the contractor for the 50 MGD
Activated Sludge Treatment Facility at Plant 1 will host a
6:30 p.m. DINNER for the Directors immediately preceding the
July 10th Joint Board meeting, for the purpose of describing
the firm's construction schedule and the methods they will em-
ploy in constructing the project. Dinner will be served in the
second floor section of the Districts' Administration Building.
We are inviting all Directors to be present at a ground-
breaking/picture-taking session for the news media scheduled
for 6:00 p.m. at the construction site, which can be reached
through the Plant No. 1 main entrance. The contractor has advised
that he will have some large, earth-moving equipment in operation
at that time.
.... ~.. -...
MANAGER'·S AGENDA REPORT
· County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS .
REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday, July.10 , 1974
7:30 p.m.
Post Office Box. B 127
10844 Ell i s Avenue
Fountain Volley , Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Areo Code 71 4
540-2910
962-2411
GARFIELD ENTRANCE TO PLANT NO. 1 CLOSED. With the beginning
of the construction of the new treatment facilities, the Plant 1
rear entrance by way of Garfield has been closed.
The following is a brief explanation of the mo re imp or tant,
non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which
are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are not attached
to the· agenda since they are made up immediatel y preceding the meeting,
but will appear in the supplemental agenda available at the meeting.
There was no meeting of the . Executive Committee dur.ing t he month of
June.
Joint Boards
Nos. 6 and 7 -Electi on of Joint Chairman and Vice Joint
Chairman.
Nominations for the positions of Joint Chairman and Vice Joint
Chairman were made at the regular June meeting. These two office rs
will be elected and seated on July 10th. The nominees for Joint
Chairman are: Directors George Scott and Donald Winn . The nominees
.for Vice Joint Chairman are: Directors Henry Duke and Norma Gibbs .
No. 12 -Consent Calendar.
The following agenda items fall into this category in accordance
with the definition established by the Boards:
No. 12-a -Approvin Plans and S ecifications for Job No . J~6-l
(Additional Pumping Fa cilities a t Oc ean Outfall Pum ping Stat i on .
John Carollo Engineers has completed t h e plans a n d specifications
for the installation of twollOO hp sludge gas -dr iven p u mp ing un its t o
be added to the Foster Outfall Booster Station. These pumps wil l be
capable of pumping 70 mgd each . The engineer's estimate is $1 ,3 90,000.
No. 12-b -Change Order No .. 2, Job No. J-13.
The change order appearing in the agenda authorizes the addition
of $20,520.54 to the contract with J. Ray Construction Compa ny f or
Shops and Warehouse Buildin g at Plant No . 1. This c hange order was
occasioned by the need to modify the plans t o meet t he specific
requirements of the City's Building and Fire Codes, and to provide
additional security to the warehouse storage area. The additional
con struct ion costs will qualify for 83% State and Federal grant
participation.
No. 12-c -In-Process Pipe Inspection Services for 1974-75
Fiscal Year.
The staff is recommending the acceptance ·of the proposal of
Testing Engineers, Inc., for in-pr6cess pipe testing for the
coming fiscal year. Included in the agenda material is a Memorandum
from the Districts' Chief Engineer, describing the manner in which
the selection of the testing firm was made.
No. 12-d -Change Order No. 1, Job No. Pl-16 (Activated
Sludge Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1).
This change order incorporates the current Federal minimum
wage rates into the contract with Donovan Construction Company of
Minnesota, as required by the State and Federal grant provisions.
This is a no-cost change order.
No. 12-e -Amending the Districts' Guidelines Implementing
the California Environmental Qua lity Act of 1970.
Resolution No. 74-91, which appears in the agenda mat erial,
amends the Districts' Environmental Guidelines to conform with
recent changes in State regulations. Approval 'of the resolution
is recommended by the Genera l Counsel.
No. 12-f -Stop Notice Against Mel Gorham Construction
Company.
The action appearing in the agenda acknowledges .receipt of
a Stop Notice submitted by Fischer and Porter Company against the
Districts' contractor for the Power Reliability Project at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2 -20.
No. 12-g -Change Order No. 3, Job No. P2-21.
This change order to the plans and specifications for
Digesters "N" and "O" at Plant No. 2 authorizes additional work
totaling $860.36, and grants an extension of time of 117 calendar
days as described in the change order. The staff recommends
approval.
No. 12-h -Authorization for Incre ase in Salary for Assistant
En g in eer .
One of our Engineering Department staff members, Don Bogart,
has r e c ent ly r e c eived notification that ·he has . successfully passed
the State examination for r eg istration in Mechanical Engineer ing .
As a recognition of this accomp li shment , we are recommending that
Mr. Bogart be granted a one -half step increase in salary . Similar
actions hav e b een take n by the Boards in the past.
-2 -
No. 12-i -Claim Against the Districts.
A claim against the Districts has been filed for .alleged
injuries received in an accident. The action appearing on the
agenda, which includes authorizing filing a late claim and deny-
ing said claim, is recommended by the General Co unsel.
District No . 2
No. 12-k -Authorizing Advertising for Bids for the Con -
_struction of the Yorba Linda Pump Station.
The District's engineers, Lowry and Associqtes, have completed
the plans and specifications for the Yorba Linda P~mp Station to
be constructed on State College property at the intersection of
Associated Road and Yorba Linda Boulevard in.the City .of Fullerton.
The engineer's estimate is $532,000, ·and the ,contractor will need
one year to construct the facility. We recommend that bids for
this project be received on September 4th.
No. 12-1 & m -Closeout of -Contract No . 2-14-1 -Santa Ana
River Interceptor .from Plant No . 1 to Katella Avenue.
Change Order No. 14 authorizes a deduction of $14,970, to
reflect the final adjustment of engineer's quantitiea, while Change
Order No. 15 grants an 18 -day extension of time due to inclement
weather. The final contract price is $7,819,756.72. It is the
staff's recommendation that the Board adopt Resolution No. 74-93-2,
accepting the job as complete and authorizing recordation of a
Notice of Completion.
No. 12-n -Change Order No. 1, Contract No. 2 -14 -2, Santa Ana
River Interceptor from Kate lla Avenue to La Palma Avenue.
This change order authorizes the contractor to use an alternate
construction method rather than jacking variou s diameters of casings
in areas designated on the plans. The staff recommends approval
of the change order at no additional cost or construction time
allowance.
District No. 3
No. 12-p -Chan g e Order No. 3, Contract No . 3-1 8, Knott
Interceptor, Contract No . 3-18, Reach 4.
This change order authorizes an extension of contract time
totaling 39 cal8ndar days for loss of time due to a strike of the
pipe suppliers' truck drivers.
-3-
No. 12-q -Agreement with the City of Stanton.
The City of Stanton has requested that the District incorporate
construction of a storm drain and street improvements (estimated
costs, $236,000) into the contract for the Knott Interceptor, Reaches
5 and 6, Contract No. 3-20-1 (estimated cost, $4,026,000) which is
currently under design. The agreement provides for reimbursement
to the District for the costs of the additional work. It is the
staff's recommendation that the agreement be approved in form
acceptable to the General Counsel.
District No. 5
No. 12-s -Change Order No. 1 to Contract No. 5-14R-3 (Manhole
Replacement and Repair).
It is recommended that this change order, waiving the District's
standard fire insurance requirements, be approved. This require-
ment was inadvertently included in the specifications for this
manhole repair contract.
District No. 11
No. 12-t -Claims by General Telephone Company .
The District has received three claims from the General
Telephone Company in connection with construction of the Slater
Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension, Contract No. 11-12. The General
Counsel recommends the action appearing on the agenda denying the
claims. The District's staff has forwarded the claims to the ·
.contractor for disposition.
No. 12-u & v -Closeout of Contract No. 11-12.
Construction of the Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension is
complete and the staff recommends approval of Change Order No . 3
which is a final adjustment of engineer's quantities, adding
$5,015 to the original contract price. Previous authorized changes
total $5,666.88, making the final contract pr ic e $429,682.38. Con-
sent Item (v) declares the contract complete and authorizes recorda-
tion of a Notice of Completion, as well as approving a Final Closeout
Agreement with the contractor.
All Districts
No. 14 -Conflict of Interest Guidelines.
Pursuant to the Board's instructions on June 26, included in
the agenda material are two versions of the Districts' guideline
resolutions, as well as a Memorandum from the General Counsel , for
the Directors' consideration. Resolution No . ·74 -52 includes the
Disclosure Provision (see Page V-6, agenda supporting documents).
'
-4-
•
No. 15 -Status Report on JPL Process.
As previously reported, t he staff has filed a Step I g rant
application with the State Water Resources Control Board to con-
struct a one-mgd activated carbon pyrolysis process unit which
will operate in a continuous mode to develop future construction
design criteria and cost -effective information concerning this new
process. Two actions appear on the agenda for Board considerat i on.
One , that authorization be approved in an .amount not to exceed
$1 0 ,000 ($7 ,500 will be for staff time and $2,500 will be required
for consultation with personnel from JPL), to continue operating the
trailer-mounted pilot unit through the month of August at which
t i me we expect approval of the Step I grant application. The other
action is a commitment from the Boards declaring intent to match
funds with JPL and NASA in an amount not to exceed $100,000 for
additiona l process development work which would be performed on the
trailer-mounted pilot unit. The State Board staff has indicated that
they will not fund any of the work performed on the.pilot unit as
this has the connotation of research work . Grant funds can only be
used for procedures ·leading to construction of treatment facilities.
We believe it is necessary that additional work be performed
on the pilot unit in conjunction with the Step I grant authorization
to develop design criteria required to construct the 1 mgd con -
tinuous flow faci l ity . It is the staff 's recommendation that the
Boards declare their intent to provide matching funds not to ex -
ceed $100,000 contingent upon receipt of the State and Federal
grant authorization to build and operate the 1 .mgd continuous flow
faci l ity. Included in the agenda supporting documents is a Memoran-
dum from the Districts' Chief Engineer, explaining in fuller detail
the current status of the JPL process. ·
District No. 3
No. 26 -Final Environmental Impact Report f.or Knott Inter-
ceptor , Reaches 5-8, Contract No . 3-20 .
The actions appearing on the agenda formally approve ~he
Environmental Impact Report for the above -named segment of the
proposed Knott Interceptor Sewer . Copies of the final report are
i ncluded. The staff recommends approval.
District No. 7
No. 37 -Final Environmental Impact Report for the Tustin-
Orange Trunk Sewer, Reaches 10 -18, Contract No . 7-6-5 .~
The actions appearing on the agenda formally approve the
Environme ntal Impact Report for the above -named segment of the
propos ed Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewe r. Copies of the final report
are included with the agenda material .
-5-
No. 38 -Engineering Design Proposal for Reaches 10, 11, and
a Portion of Reach 12 of the Tustin -Orange Trunk Sewer.
Enclosed is a proposal from Boyle Engineering Corporation to
provide engineering design services for the Tustin-Orange Trunk ·
Sewer from Redhill and Mitchel l to Fairhaven and Esplanade. The
preliminary engineer's estimate for construction is $1,214 ,000.
We anticipate the work will be let as two contracts. The engineer's
design fee for both contracts is $57,847 ($63,855 minus $6,008
credited for the completed preliminary engineering studies). The
design cost is well below the reconunended ASCE fee for comparable
projects; therefore, the staff reconunends acceptance of the pro-
posal.
District No . 11
No. 45 -Bolsa Chica State Beach Annexation (Annexation No. 17).
The standard resolution appearing in the agenda orders annexa-
tion of 3.55 acres to the District in the viciniti of Warner Avenue
and Pacific Coast Highway. The Board declared its intent to annex
this property on March 13, 1 974.
No. 46 -Agreement to Provide Sewer Service for the Bolsa
Chica State Beach.
The staff has been meeting with representatives of the State
Department of Parks and Recreation relative to the preparation of
an agreement to provide for the acceptance of up to 172,800 gallons
of sewage per day from the Bolsa Chica State Park which will be
in the District once the pending Annexation No. 17 is completed.
Basically, the State has agreed to pay the sum of $60,480 (which
includes $990 for Annexation No. 17) for the capacity rights. In
addition, the District will collect user fees, currently $85 per
million gallons of sewage discharged . It is recommended that
Resolution No . 74-97-11 be approved, authorizing execution of an
agreement with the State Department of Parks and Recreation , in
form acceptable to the General Counsel .
-6-
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
~-.
Report of the Joint Chairman
No. 7 -Election of Vice Joint Chairman, utilizing the same
Canvassing Committee.
No. 9 -Report of the Joint Chairman. Call meeting of the
Executive Committee for 5:30 p.m., Tuesday, July 30th.
Invite 2 of the following Directors to attend and parti-
cipate in the discussions: Directors Callahan, Graham,
Kaywood, MacKain.
No. 18 -Other Business.
Call the Boards into executive session to discuss a
personnel matter. Ask that the General Manager, General
Counsel, Chief Engineer, and Director of Finance remain
in the room.
Chairman Porter
July 10, 1974
Item No. 6 -Election of Joint Chairman. Appoint a Canvassing
Committee of the General Counsel and two Directors,
to poll the ballots.
f
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation D istricts Post Office Box 8 127
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis A ven u e
Founta i n Volley, Calif., 9 2708
Tel ephone s:
II
(1 )
(2)
( 3 )
( 4 )
F1LE ···-·-·········
t en~R
A/C c .... ~-~~-~-·Jiil Is
·······-················-
·-················-··-
JOINT BOARDS
MEETING DATE
JULY 10, 1974 -7:30 P.M.
Pl edge o f Allegiance and I nvocat i on
Ro ll Ca ll
Area Code 71 4
540-2910
962-24 1 1
AGENDA
AD JOUR~llf.EN TS ...... .":::: ..... -
CO:;;p .•, t.i lL E.t\GE .... J.-:'.-:'.':° ...
nLES S£T ur .................... ..
P.[Sau;;;::i ::s c:rn :r:rn.,,.......-
LEnrns VIR ITTEN ............. .
1.\INUTES VHll TTEN .... ~ .. .
MI NU TES FI LED ......... .'::::: ••
Appo i ntment of Cha i rmen p r o tern, i f necessary 11.3 _Q~
DISTRICT 2
Considerat ion of mot i o n to r eceive and file minute
exc e rptsfr om the City o f Pl acentia r egarding elect i on
of mayo r a nd appoint me n t of aiter nat e , and seating
new membe r s of the Boar ds (*Mayor)
DIST. NO. ACTIVE ALTERNATE
~~ A<_4 c~, 2 Michae l J. Ca l lahan Robert B . Ly ons*
3 ~~ ~~"""" ~v~ ~ ~i(~·.E
"F ILE .•..•.•..•...• {-5) DI STRI CT 8 .... ·1-;...,u_ ~ .............. An n ual election of Chairman '-fl'IN'<."""
A/c •••. TKLR (6) Annual e l ect i on of J o i nt Cha i rman . t.U ~ pages "A" and "B" ______ ................ .
---·-···-c1 )
(8 )
Fi l £:_.,. ........... .
lETIE R ···-··-···-
A/C .... TKLR ••••
~~:~::~::~.::~::~
FILE •.•....••••.••• 5
LETTER ........... _ ( ,,,....
A/C .... TKLR • ·( 1 1 )
·--· .. ················•• /
An n ual e l ec tion of Vice Joint Ch a irman"'l'.Y~
EACH DI ST RI CT
Conside rati on o f mot i o ns a pp r ovi ng min utes o f the
fo llow i ng meet i ngs , as mail ed:
Ml s Dist ri ct 1 June 1 2, 1974 r egular and
June 26 , 1974 a djourned
lhls Dist rict 2 J u n e 12 , 1974 regular and
June 26 , 1 974 adjo u r n ed
1•\I ':> Di strict 3 Jun e 1 2 , 1974 r egu l ar and
June 26 , 197 4 adjourned
11t1.5 Dist rict 5 June 12, 1974 r egular an d
June 26 , 1 974 adjourn e d
f'!I /) Di s trict 6 June 1 2 , 1 974 regular and cJ:rll
June 26 , 1 974 a djourned -a.At~ • ·
NI/ ') Di s t r ic t 7 J u ne 1 2 , 1 9 7'4 r egul ar and
J une 26 , 1 974 a djourned
,..,, .s Di strict 8 Ap r il 10 , 1 974 regular
"'!/') District 11 June 1 2, 1974 r egu l a r and
June 26 , 1 97 4 adjourned
ALL DI STRI CTS
Report o f the J o int Chairman
ALL DI STRI CTS
Re p ort of t he Ge n eral Manager
AL L DISTRI CTS
Repo r t of t h e General Co u nsel
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Roll Call Vote or Cast
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered
as not requiring discussion or further explanation and
unless any particular item is requested to be removed from
the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member
of the public in attendance, there will be no separate
discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar
will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions inc luded on the
consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar
shall be considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the
consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state
their name, address and designate by letter the i tem to be
removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from
the consent calendar.
Una ni mous Ballot Consideration of action to approve all agenda i terns appearing
on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same.
FILE ..........•..•.••• -....._
~--············
A /C •..• TKLR .•••
~~R .. ~.
FILE .....•••........••
LETIER •....••.•••.••
A/C .••. TKLR ••••
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 74-90, approving plans
and spec ifications for Additional Pumping Facilities
at Ocean Outfall Pump ing Station, Job No. J-6 -1; and
authorizing the General Manager to establish the bid
date upon receipt of approval from State and
Federal agencies. See page "C"
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 ,
to the plans and spec ifications for the Shops and
Warehouse Building at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-13,
authorizing an addition of $20,520.54 and g r ant ing an
extension of time of 2 42 calendar days to the contract
with J. Ray Construction Company. See page "D"
FI LE •...... ~... ( C) Consideration of motion accepting proposal of Testing
Engineers, Inc., dated June 20, 197 4 , for conducting
in-process pipe testing for the 1974 -75 fiscal year i n
accordance with the rates stipulated in said proposal .
!\.ETIE R •. S?..'?..~
A/C ••.• TKLR ·-·
FI LE ....•..•.......•••
LETIER ·······-·····
A/C .•.. TKLR ..••
-··························
FILE ................. .
LETIER ·······-···-
A/C ·8·-·
.............. ~---·······-
(d)
(e )
See page "E"
Cons ideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1,
to the plans and specifications for Activated Sludge
Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl -1 6 ,
incorporating F ederal Minimum Wage Rates into the
contract with Donovan Construction Company of Minnesota.
See page "F 11
Consid e ration of Resolution No. 74-91, ad opting
Amendment No. 2 to the Districts' Guidelines Impleme nting
the California Environme ntal Quality Act of 1970, as
amended , to conform with recent chan ge s in State r e g ula-
tions, as recommended by the General Couns e l . Se e
page "G"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 3 )
-2 -
(12) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
FILE "? •. ~ ........... ( f ) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop
Notice submitted by Fischer & Porter Company
against Mel Gorham Construction Company, Contractor
for Power Reliability Project ·at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-20, in the amount of $10,153.50
LETTER ........... ••
A/C •••. TKLR ... .
......,__ ............... .
FILE ................. ..
LETTER .••.•.•..•.•••
A/C •••• TKLR ••••
FILE ·······-···-·-
LETTER ·······-···-
A/C •••• TKLR ••••
..._·-·-········-··-
.......... ._ .. -... .......
FILE ···············-
LETTER ... ~
A/C •••• TKLR ··-
·--··-·-····---
....... --·----···· .....
(g) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3,
to the plans and specifications for Digesters "N" & "O"
at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-21, authorizing an addition
of $860.36 and granting an extension of time of 117
calendar days to the contract with Hemisphere Constructors.
See page "H"
(h) Consideration of motion granting a one-half step
increase to Districts' Assistant Engineer, Donald
Bogart, from Range 53C, Step 3.5 ($1222) to Step 4
($1254)
(i) Consideration of motion to receive and file claim of
Theresa Rosales filed by John Covas, dated June 24, 1974,
in the amount of $10,200.00, for alleged injuries
incurred in an accident involving a District-owned
vehicle, authorizing filing of late claim, and denying
said claim, as recommended by the General Counsel
(j) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff
progress report on Treatment Plant Construction
projects. See page "I"
FILE .B::~.'f... DISTRICT 2
meR ···--···
~C •••• TKLR ••••
fl r~ ,;""'.'' -l-J,~ ...... ~
Ml .. •a-.u ... .-..... ._.
FllE --
LETTER ............ ...
A/C •••. TKLR ··-
···-··-·········-~
·--·---·-·---
f1LE ....•.•.•.••..•••. v-
(k) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 74-92-2,
approving plans and specifications for Yorba Linda Pump
Station, Contract No. 2-15, and authorizing
advertising for bids on September 4, 1974
(1) Consideration of motion approving the following Change
Orders to the plans and specifications for the Santa Ana
River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to
Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, and authorizing
changes to the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting
Company as follows:
Change Order No. 14 -Deduction of $14,970.00
See page "J"
Change Order No. 15 -Time extension of 18 calendar
days. See page "K"
tmER ............ ~ (m) Consideration of Resolution No. 74-93-2, accepting the
Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1
to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, as complete;
authorizing execution of Notice of Completion; and
.., ' ~ •••• TKLR ••••
i..!:'.:.:±. ___ y
··LE ·······---
~nER---···-···-
A/C •••• TKLR ....
____ ....... ......
(n)
approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "L"
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1,
to the plans and specifications for the Santa Ana River
Interceptor from Katella Avenue to LaPalma Avenue,
Contract No. 2-14-2, authorizing a change in method of
construction, at no cost to the District, in the contract
with Kasler Corporation and L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc., a
Joint Venture. See page "M"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
(12) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
DISTRICT 2 (continued)
(o) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress
report on the construction of the Santa Ana River Inter-
ceptor from Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract
No. 2-14-2. See page "N"
DISTRICT 3
FILE .... .._ ... """"""'"" ( p )
lEnER ...... ,,. .. ,en
A/C •••• TKLR ""
' ....
(q)
:. __ FILE .•• ~ •••••
LEnER ........ :.: .....
A/C •. _TKLR ••••
--~ -·---••• --:(:?; /
----------..... ,. ....
(r)
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3,
to the plans and specifications for the Knott Interceptor,
Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18 granting an extension of
39 calendar days to the contract with A. G. Tutor Co.,
Inc. & N. M. Saliba Co., a Joint Venture. See page "O"
Consideration of Resolution No. 74-99-3, approving and
authorizing execution of agreement with the City of Stanton,
in form approved by General Counsel, to incorporate con-
struction of City storm drain and street improvements into
the contract for the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 & 6,
Contract No. 3-20-1, and providing for reimbursement of
City's share of cost to the District. See page "P"
Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress
report on construction of the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4,
Contract No. 3-18. See page "Q"
DISTRICT 5
FIL! ...............•••
lEnER ............•.
~ A/C .... TKLR ••••
----------·-·········
-----··--........
( s) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1,
to the plans and specifications for Manhole Replacement
and Repair, Contract No. 5-14R-3, authorizing waiver of
fire insurance requirements in the contract with Rewes-
Schock, a Joint Venture. See page "R"
DISTRICT 11
(t)
FILE -··-··-·--
~~-·:;-··i.{ •.
A/C •••. TKLR ••••
----·--··--......._ ____ .....,...
FILE ................. .
l.EmR ·-···········
A/C .... TKLR -··
·----·-···-·-··---
FILE .••••••..•...•..•.
lETrER ······--·~:_
>.JC ••.. TKL~ ·-· _____ : ______ , __ ...J_'
......._. .......... _._ .. ...
(u)
-~;/
(v)
Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny the
following claims submitted by General Telephone Company
in connection with construction of the Slater Avenue
Trunk Sewer Extension, Contract No. 11-12, as recommended
by the General Counsel:
Dated June 7, 1974 in the amount of $ 435.43
Dated June 10, 1974 in the amount of
Dated June 21, 1974 in the amount of
2,200.00
3,271.48
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3,
to the plans and specifications for Slater Avenue Trunk
Sewer Extension, Contract No. 11-12, au~horizing an
addition of $5,015.00 to the contract with Kordick & Son,
Inc. See page "S"
Consideration of Resolution No. 74-95-11, accepting Slater
Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension, Contract No. 11-12, as
complete; authorizing execution of Notice of Completion;
and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "T"
FILE ••••••• _ • .(lJ) ALL DISTRICTS
LETrER ............... -Consideration of i terns deleted from consent calendar, if any
A/C •••• TKLR •• ,. \~ ( ~) \
···-----············~
-----···-··--~
-4-
(14) EACH DISTRICT
FfLE (a)
LETIER ·--"'"" lYj \ <;
Consideration of motion to receive and file General
Counsel's memorandum of June 27, 1974, re Conflicts of
:~~~~
Interest. See page "U"
Report of General Counsel re Conflict·s of Interest
Further consideration by each District of Guidelines for
Implementation of the Governmental Conflicts of Interest
Act. For copies of Districts' existing Guidelines'
resolutions stayed by the Boards on April 10, 1974 :
Districts 1, 2, 3 & 11 See page "V"
Districts 5, ~ & 7 See page "W"
(15) ~ISTRICTS ~ Staff report on grant funding for JPL Process
PILE •.•• ____... ey. .. ::Rt~~
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing extension of participa-
tion with .J e t Propulsion Labora tory of Cal Tech in .their .M L. experimental pilot project for reactivated carbon wastewater
t'tf:::;> treatment process, for an amount not to exceed $10,000 A/C •••. TKLR ••••
--·-··••000400--
*"-·-··-··--
(16)
' ( c) > Consideration of motion declaring intent to match funds
with JPL and NASA in an amount not to exceed $100,000 for
any additional process development work to be p e rfor med on
the JPL trailer mounted pilot unit, conting ent up on receipt
of state and federal grant authorization (Step l Grant) to
proceed with the construction and operation of a l MGD
reactivated carbon wastewater treatment process facility
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file certification of
the General Mana g er that he has checked all bills a p pea ring
on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he
recommends authoriza tion for payment
(17) ALL DISTRICTS
(17) Con siderat ion of r o ll call vote motion approving J oint
ROLL CALL VOTE .. /l~j ~ Operating and Capital Outlay Revolv ing Fund warrant
L I books for s i gnature of the Ch a irman of Di s t rict No . l,
ITEMS Or• f l 1ms li t d "I" SUPPLEMEHTAl AGEN DA and authorizing payment o c a s e on page
flLE ···-·-·'"="~;;ALL DI STRICTS £ ~ } ..,.. fl·."/ o -~ ·. _s-v
LETTER ............. ~ Oth e r bus ine ss and cormnunications or supplemental a g end a
A/C .... TKLR .... ite~s' if any
-.. 7 -;vi lS> ·-t~ ............ . (18) Con sid e r a tion of motion r a tifying action of Gen e r al
Manager in i s suing p u r chase orde r t o W. J. Foster
Con s tructi on Comp any i n the am ount of $2 ,8 50.00 for
emerge n cy con st ruc tion of Plant No. 2 dige ster over flow
treatment beds
ITEMS ON
SU Pi'L EMENTAl AGE'NOA
<->E.:s .
(19 ) QIS~RIC~S 1 & 7
Oon:!iaerat;ieR e f mot;ieR a 1919 rev1Rg e'tle19eRe e f 'tlfi8: warrant-a ,
if aRY• See e'tlf9J9lem c nt;a l a ~enaa at t achment
(20) DIS ~R I G~ l
Ge n sie c ratiofi of mo t;ion a 1919 reviRg warre:Hte, i f aRy.
See supplemenb~l a g enda a t;t;aefimeA t
(21) DISTRI CT 1
\ ~ther u s ines
"--1.t...em s , i f a n y
(2 2) DISTRI CT 1
comzmrfiica:~_~or ~ement a l a ge n d a
Cons i de r a ti on o f motio n t o adjourn J -._5:?
(2 3 ) DI STRIC T 2
mMs o ~ I"\)<;. ( 23) Cons i der at ion of motion approvin g warrants .
SUJlr E NT.Al ~-Dl See page "II"
r. ···~-~~·: "( 2 4) '!STRICT 2
LETIER f"......... Other busines s and c ommunications or s upple me ntal agend a
A/C A K\R ···· items , i f an y -\31--··... (2 4) Cons ideration of mo t ion to r e c e ive and file Stop No t ice
' Xs~f.r· / s u bm itted by F . B. Co o k Corp or at i on against Su lly-Mill er SUP~'iJi~rAl. AGENDA IV\ S Cont r act i ng , Co n trac t or fo r t he Santa Ana River Interce p t or
from Re clamation Plant No . 1 t o Kat e lla Av e nue, Con t ra c t
~~ ~""~ o . 2-14-1 , in the a mount o f $29,16 5 .10
( 2 5') -I-S-T ICT 2
Con s i de r a tion of motion to a djourn J!>'. 5 ~
-5-
(26) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of actions required by the District's Guidelines
Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,
as amended, re proposed Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5-8,
~\\S Contract No. 3-20: (Final EIR mailed with agenda material)
FI LE ~.~.~€·a·) Consideration of motion to receive and file comments
Lme11 .............. received from the following agencies pursuant to the
AJc .... TKLR .... Draft Environmental Impact Report for said facility
---·-(Copies included in EIR):
City of La Habra, dated April 15, 1974
City of Fullerton, dated April 19, 1974
City of Stanton, dated April 19, 1974
City of Garden Grove, dated April 23, 1974
City of Huntington Beach, dated April 26, 1974
Orange County Planning Department, dated May 1, 1974
City of Stanton, dated May 30, 197 4
City of Fountain Valley, dated June 11, 1974
City of La Habra, dated June 13, 1974
City of Brea, dated June 14, 1974
City of Stanton, dated June 20, 197 4
City of Stanton, dated June 25, 1974
City of Cypress, dated June 27, 1974
City of Huntington Beach, dated June 28, 1974
City OY We~tminste~, d~ted June 27; 197 4
LETIER ·····•••·•·•••
A/C •.. .1KLR ·••• ( b ) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve
Final Environmental Impact Report for Knott Interceptor,
Reaches 5-8, Contract No. 3-20 ---·--
(27) DI8TRIGT£ 3 & 11
Consideration of motion approving suspense fund waPrants,
·if any. Bee--8-ti~emen-tal ageHda attachffieRt-
(28) DISTRICT 3
m~c~ (28) Consideration of motion approving warrant s .
suPrttMWJAl AGcNDA ft\.} s See page "II "
(29) DISTRIC~...-~ ~
~ther busines-& ~nd commu -i.~at-~ons or supplemental agenda
items, if any ~
(30) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn :ii". 59
(31) DISTRICT 5
ITEMSON (31) Consideration of motion approving warran ts.
s u ?PLEM ENTAL AGENt>A IV\ ls See page "II"
(32) DISTRICT 5
Qthe_:: business
i17ems, if any
nd commtlril:-c-atiQill5-0~upplemental agenda
(33)
( 3 lf)
DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn Cl :S>-C
DIS'3?RIC'3? 6
Consideration of motion approving uarrants, if any.
See stt~~lemental agei'i6a attachment
(35) DISTRICT 6
(36)
Gther bus~rress and c
items, if any
unicatio s or sup -lemental agenda
DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn 9 :s-a
-6-
(37) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of actions required by the District's Guidelines
Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,
as amended, re proposed Tustin-Orange Tr.unk Sewer, Reaches 10-18,
Contract No. 7-6-5 : (Final EIR mailed with agenda material )
rtLE --~~-~.::::. ~ Consideration of motion to receive and file comments
LETTE R.............. ( received from the following agencies pursuant to the
AJc .... TKLR •• ../It ~ Draft Environmental Impact Report for said facility
---··••••HO. __ ... _
LETTER ............ ..
(Copies included in EIR)
Orange County Road Department, dated April 11, 1974
City of Tustin, dated April 11, 1974
Southern Pacific Transportation Co., dated April 16, 1974
Orange County Road Department, dated April 24, 1974
Orange County Flood Control District, dated April 29, 1974
City of Orange, dated June 20, 1974
Orange County Planning Department, dated June 26, 1974
City of Tustin, dated June 26, 1974
A/C •••• TKLR •••• (b) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Final
1
-············· lS Environmental Impact Report for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, __ ........ /Vl Reaches 10-18, Contract No. 7-6-5
(38)
FILE .••.. v.:'.':.M. I <;,. ~~,f!::.~
A/C .... TKLR •••.
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal
submitted by Boyl e Engineering Corporation, dated July 3, 1974,
for engineering services in connection with preparation of plans
and specifications for Tusti~~orange Trunk Sewer, Reaches 10,
11 and a portion of Reach 12, for a fee of $63,855.00, less
preliminary engineering fees of $6,008.00 , for a net total
design fee not to exceed $57,847.00. See page "X"
(39) DISTRICT 7 -.
(39) Consideration of motion approving warrants.
"EMS ON I s "III" SUP~cNTA L AGEND Jl\ll s ee page
(40) DISTRICT 7
\Other buffi~ co~Ri-ca:t--3..~:c.-s-upplemental agenda
items , if any
(41) DISTRICT 7 ~/
Consideration of motion to adjourn 9.-~;r-
(42) DISTRICT 8
ROLL CALL VOTE' Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the 1974-75
·~-;--\ Operating Fund Budget in the amount of $1,991.00. See
'v' S page "Y"
(43)
(44)
(45)
Roll Call Vote or Cast
~~Ballot
~E RS) ........... f'l1 j s
A/( LR •.••
J:..,:'.V.ht.~ . ~-----,~..:. c
~:,! '-"'-;"'_t.:( 4 6 )
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Unanimous Ballot
~~/ . (FllE / .......... " ........ \..._.; a--
I.ETIER -~:rn Is
A/C ...• TKlR -
... ~<21.~
···-······-··---
n.a~uni.ca-t·ron8-or-5u.pp.J. emen t al agenda
DISTRICT 8
Consideration of motion to adjour n f~oS""""
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of Resolution No ... 74-96-11, ordering
annexation of approximately 3,55 acres to the District in the
vicinity of Warner Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway Alternate
(Annexation No. 17 -Bolsa Chica State Beach Annexation t o
County Sanitation District No. 11) See page "Z"
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of Resolution No. 74-97-11, approving an d
authorizing execution of agreement with State Department of
Parks and Recreation, in form approved by General Counsel, for
disposal of sewage originating within the Bolsa Chica State
Beach and providing for payment thereof to the District. See
PEtge "AA"
-7-
..
(47) DISTRICT 11
MS ON (47) Consideration of motion approving warrant s .
ITT 1/ "III" suPPlEMENTAL AGENDA tY1t $ See page
(48) DISTRICT _lJ
(49)
OtUJ,er busine~ and /c-ommtl£~G-a~~ons or supplemental agenda
items, if any
DISTRICT 11
Considerati o n of motion to adj o urn 1 : () S:--
-8-
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8 12 7
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones :
ALL DISTRICTS
JOINT BOARDS
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS
JULY 10; 1974 -7:30 P.M.
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
(17) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint
Operating a·nd Cap i ta l Outlay Revolv ing Fund warrant
bo oks for signature of the Chairman of District No . 1,
and authorizing payment of claims lis ted on page "I"
(18) Consideration of motion ratifying action of Genera l
Manager in issuing purchase order to W. J . Foster
Construction Company in the amount. o f $2, 850 . 00 f or
emergency const ructi on o f Plant No . 2 digester overflow
treatment beds
DISTRICT 2
(2 3) Consideration o f motion approving warrants .
See page "I I "
(24) Consideration of mot i o n to r ece ive and file Stop Not i ce
submitted by F. B. Cook Corporat ion · against Sully -Miller
Contracting , Contractor for the Santa Ana River Interceptor
fro m Rec l amation Plant No . 1 to Ka te l la Avenue, Con tract
No . 2 -1 4 -1 , in the amount of $29 ,165 .10
bISTRICT 3
(28) Consideration of motion app roving warrants .
See page "II"
DISTRICT 5
(31) Consideration of motion approving warrant~.
See page "II"
DISTRI CT 7
(39) Consideration of motion approving warrants .
See page "III"
DISTRICT 11
(47) Consideration of motion approving warrants .
See page "III"
WARRANT NO.
23256
23257
23258
23259
23260
I 23261
23262
23263
232 64
232 65
23266
232 67
23268
23269
23270
23271
23272
23273
23274
23275
23276
23277
23278
2327 9
23280
2328 1
23282
23283
23284
23285
23286
23287
23288
23289
23290
23291
23292
23293
23294
23295
23296
23297
23298
23299
23300
23301
. 23302
23303
23304
23305
23306
2 3307
23308
23309
2 3 3 1 0
2 3 311
23312
23313
23314
23315
23316
23317
23318
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
I N FAVOR OF
Ai r California; Air Fare, Pl-16 Grant Meeting
Airpo r t Service, Inc., Orientation Bus Charter
Alex Fish Company, Ecological Research Supplies
All Bearing Service, Bushings & Hose
Allied Bolt & Supply, Hardware
Almquist Tool & Equipment, Too ls
American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts
City of Anaheim, Power
Anaheim Sewer Construction, Late ral Repair
The Anc hor Packing Co., Pump Packing
Apco Supply, Filters
Associated Concrete Products,Inc., Man ho le Rings
Atomic Absorption News l etter, Technical Journal
Banning Battery Company, Batteries
Baxter & Cicero, In c ., Ecological Research Supplies
Bearing Specialty Company, Bearings
Beckman Inst ruments, Lab Supplies
Bell Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supp lies
Bende r Machine, Inc., Compressor Repair
Bishop Graphics, Printing
The Black & De cker Mfg. Company, Too l Repair
Do n Bogart, Employee Mileage
Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Ma g net os
Bristol Park Medical Group, I nc ., Pre-empl oyment Exams
Broadlick Art Supply, Drafting Suppli e s & Frame s
C & R Reconditioning Co., Compr es s p r & Pump Repair
Cal's Came r as, Photo Supplie s, Proc essing & Repairs
Cal State S eal Company, Gasket s
$
AMOUN T
4 8 .70
80 .00
53 .00
370.~~
90 .
270.58
1,899 .28
62.89
125.00
357.83
14.92
114.48
7.50
364.01
40.28
276.66
20.99
256.16
l_,14 9.35
82 .28
39.60
39.00
1,138 .33
26.00
124.90
1,105 .00
1 62 .83
118.96
1 88 ~s California Auto Collisio n, Inc ., Truck Re p air
State of California Board of Equalization, 1973-74
J ohn Carollo Eng inee rs, Eng ineering Service, NPDES
Case Power & Equipment , Manual
Certanium Alloys & Re search, Welding Suppli e s
Certif ied Laboratories, Lubricants
Brian Chuchua 's, Truck Parts
Sale s Tax 42 4~
Permit 84 .13
1 1 .87
145 .48
1 62 .69
77 .42
Clark Dye Hardware, Too ls
Clark Equipment Company, Equipme nt Rental
Coast Insurance Agency, Liability I nsurance Pre mium
College Lumber Co ., I nc ., Bl dg . Matls. & Hardware
Consolidated Electric Co ., Electric Supplies
Consolidated Electric Distributors, Electric Supplies
Constructors Supply Co ., Hardware & Tools
Control Specialists, Inc., Regulator & Engine Part s
Costa Me sa Auto Parts, Inc ., Truck Parts
Costa Mesa County Wate r District, Water
Mr. Crane, Crane Rental
County of Orange, Printing
Crest Leasin g , Vehicle Le ase
Clarence S . Cummin g s, Employee Mi l eage
Curtin Matheson Scie ntif ic, Inc.; Lab Supplies
C. R. Davis Supp ly Company, Hose
Richard S . Dawson Company, Pump Parts
De Gu e lle & Sons Glass Company, Tru ck Repair
De l Ch e mical Corp o rati on , Cl ean er
Department of General Services, Safety Ma nuals
Diamond Core Drilling Compa ny, Co r e Dr ill ing
Diana Distributors , Cl eane r
Diese l Contro l Co r p ., Filte r s
Dominguez Marine & Industrial Supply Co ., Pipe Supplies
Dow Chem ica l Compa ny, Chemicals (MO 1 -10-73 )
Ida L . Du esber g , Emp l oyee .M ileage
Wilbur R. Eads , Employee Mil eage
Eastman, Inc ., Off ice Suppl ies
I-1
9 4.88
593.60
31,97 3 .00
14 3 . 2 1
~33 .87
4 69 .46
li87 . 0 9
122 .54
408.07 6 .oo
121.54
8 .o o
14 7 .28
48.30
326 .7 1
1 65 .3 6
1 23 .82
76 .48
37 ...,6
5
280 .00
2 12 .4 5
2 45 .75
357 .11
1,65 3.32
23 .94
8 .40
88 .33 .
WARRAN'r NO.
23319
23320
23321
23322
23323
1324
~325
' 23326
23327
23328
23329
23330
23331
23332
23333
23334
23335
23336
23337
23338
23339
2331.Jo
233LJ1
233LJ2
23343
23344
23345
23346
23347
23348
~ 1349
~350
23351
23352
23353
23354
23355
23356
23357
23358
23359
23360
23361
23362
23363
23364
23365
23366
23367
23368
23369
23370
23371
23372
23373
-i374
¥3375 23376 .
23377
23378
23379
23380
23381
23382
23383
23384
IN FAVOR OF
Electric Supplies Distributing, Electric Supplies
Enchanter, Inc., Oceanographic Service (MO 2-13-74)
Enterprise Printing Company, Spec. Supplies & Printing
FMC Corporation, Vibrator Parts
Fibre Glass Evercoat Co., Inc. Fiberglass Supplies
Finishers' Management, Technical Journal
Fischbeck Plumbing, Lateral Repair
Fischer &.Porter Company, Metering Equip.& Supplies
City of Fountain Valley, Water
William Fox, Employee Mileage
France Products Division, Pump Parts
Edward R. Francis, CWPCA Conference Expense (MO 6-13-73)
Frederick Pump & Engineering, Pump Parts
Freeway Machine and Welding, Machining
Larry Fricker Company, Inc., Weed Killer
Garden Grove Lumber & Cement, Building Materials
General Electric Supply Co., Electric Supplies
General Telephone Company
Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine Contract 1-1-73
Goldenwest Fertilizer Co., Grit Removal
Hach Chemical Company, Inc., Chemicals & Lab Supplies
Hardware Systems Company, Lab & Ecological Research Supplies
Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting & COD Expenses
Harrington Industrial Plastics, Pipe Supplies
Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal
Hertz Car Leasing Division, Leased Vehicles
Hewlett Packard, Training Seminar
Howard Supply Company, Pipe Suppli~s
Hundley Company, Inc., Controls
City of Huntington Beach, Water & Technical Manual
Huntington Beach Equipment Rentals, Equipment Rental
Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware
International Business Machines, Mtce. Agrm. & Office Sup.
International Harvester Co., Truck Parts
Irvine Ranch Water District, Water
Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supplies
King Bearing, Inc., Bushings & Bearings s. P. Kinney Engineers, Inc., Strainer Parts
Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tools and Tool Repair
L & N Uniform Supply Company, Uniform Service
The La.cal Company, Inc., Pump Packing
R. H. Landin Graphics, Printing
Lavender Fastener Company, Hardware
Lawless Detroit Diesel, Equipment Parts
Judy Lee, Employee Mileage
Mc Coy Ford Tractor, Equipment Parts
John Mc Cullough, Employee Mileage
Mc Graw-Hill Publications Co., Technical Journal
Mc Master-Carr Supply Company, Hardware
Majestic Fasteners Company, Hardware ·
Mar Vac Electronics, Electronic Supplies & Tools
Master Blueprint & Supply Co., SOP Printing
Mine Safety Appliances Company, Test Equipment
Mobil Oil Corporation, Grease
National Lumber & Supply, Buildlng Materials
City of Newport Beach, Water
Newport Supply Company, Hose
C. Arthur Nissan, Gen 1 l. Counsel Retainer & Qrtly. Chgs.
Nolex Corporation, Reproduction Supplies
Oranco Supply Company, Pipe Supplies
City of Orange, Water
Orange County Chemical Company, Chemicals
Orange County Water District, Water Replenishment
Orange County Wholesale Electric, Electric Supplies
Overhead Door Company of Orange County, Inc., Door Repair
I-2
AMOUNT
188.50
3,000.00
231.93
251.57
84.77
5.00
85.00
3,261.42
40.00
27.90
271.10
145. 42
55.57
222.60
1.05
190.01
188.65
765. 01.
4,061.71
2,904.oo
263.63
141.93
208.11
14.25
70.00
567.62
150.00
1,193.15
496.69
49.13
25.20
260.53
9LJ7. 26
5.11
2.30
505.99
78.21
102.14
35.74
576.42
2,476.80
292.93
91.J.55
170.19
89. 57
67.35
153.29
102.12
7.50
117.08
137.31
44.56
63.23
78.40
53.05
66.13
315.21
55.65
2,587.50
570.17
1,310.52
9.82
76.00
102.50
94. 26
131.06.
WARRANT NO. . .
23385
23386
23387
23388
23389
23390
23391
' 23392
23393
23394
23395
23396
23397
23398
23399
23400
23401
23402
23403
23404
23405
23lto6
231-to7
23408
23409
23410
23411
23412
23413
23414
23415
23416
23417
23418
23419
23420
23421
23422
23423
23424
23425
23426
23427
23428
23429
23430
231~31
231-t 32
23433
23434
23435
23436
23437
23438
23439
231~40
23441
23LJ1.J2
23L143
23444
23445
23446
231~47
IN FAVOR OF
Pacific Pumping Company, Freight
Pacific Telephone
M. C. Patten & Co., Inc., Gauges & Hardware
Petrolane, Propane
Postmaster
R & S Sales Company, Blower
Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal
Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts
Rodale Press, Inc., Technical Journal
Roseburrough Tool, Inc., Hardware
Routh Transportation, Oil Removal & Disposal
Ruff's Saw Service, Tools
Ryan Herco, Pipe & Pipe Supplies
S & J Chevrolet, Truck Parts
Santa Ana Blue Print Company, Printing
Santa Ana Book Store, Inc., Technical Manual
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Rewind & Repairs
Santa Anita Blueprint, Inc., Printing
Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies
Sashco, Inc., Door Repair
Scientific Products, Lab Supplies
Scott Refrigeration Service, Inc., Equipment Repair
City of Seal Beach, Water
Richard J. Shaffer, Whse. & Purch. Consultant (MO 2-13-74)
Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Supplies
John Sigler, Employee Mileage
Fred Sinasek, Employee Mileage
South Orange Supply, Pipe Supplies
Southern California Edison
Southern California Gas Company
Southern California Water Co., Water
Southwest Flexible Co., Machine Tools
Southwest Processors, Inc., Oil Disposal
Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water
Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Standard Oil Company of California, Oil & Gasoline
Starow Steel, Steel
State Compensation Insurance Fund, Workmans Comp.Ins.Prem.
Supreme Steam, Carpet Cleaning
Surveyors Service Company, Survey Supplies
Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage
Taylor-Dunn, Equipment Parts
Tiernan's Office Equipment, Machine Repair
Treck Photographic, Inc., Photo Equipment
J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Hardware & Blower Parts
Tustin Water Works, Water
U. S. Divers Company, Equipment Repair
U. s. Equipment, Compressor Parts
Union Oil Company, Gasoline
United Auto Parts, Truck Parts
United Reprographics, Inc., Printing
United States Government Printing· Office, Fed'l. Regist~r
Utilities Supply Company, Tools
Valvate Associates, Pump Parts
Wallace & Tiernan, Gaskets
John R. Waples, R.S., Odor Consultant
Guy L. Warden & Sons, Pump Parts
West Coast Industries, Freight
Western Salt Company, Salt
Westinghouse Electric Corp., Electric Supplies
White, J?ine & Ambrogne, Dr., Prof. Serv. (MO ·5-8-74)
Wilson Engine & Equipment Co., Gaskets
World Travel Bureau, Inc., Air Fare, (MO 6-12-74)
I-3
, • > •
AMOUNT
36.74
462 .ln
530.32
12.89
lt28. 80 412 .. r-,
40~~
2,474.76
6.oo
33.13
211.32
129.68
357.93
37.97
291.95
19.08
309.17
40.07
193-97
351.39
122.17
109.08
8.80
400.00
684.93
9.90
33. '"(8
177.45
40,539.69
543. 16 3.cc;
1, 0 34 ·'---,,_ ___ _
293. 0'1
61.65
455.31
2,191.09
932.73
14,ooo.oo
600.00
2.57
37.62
71.83
22.50
78.21
388.57
82.20
30.22
989.51
74.53
607.06
696.22
45.00
23.91
1,038.70
45.56
218., ')
38~
7 .4.2
50.35
121.25
1,500.00
128.90
193.27
WARRANT NO. . .
23448
23449
23450
23451
23452
23453
23454
23455
23456
23457
23458
23459
23460
23461
23462
23463
23464
23465
IN FAVOR OF
Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage
Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Service
George Yardley Associates, Filter
Zodiac Paper Company, Reproduction Supplies
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
AMOUNT
46.50
1,009.77
95.40
242.12
$ 155,504.08
Bruning Division, Drafting Equipment $ 110.44
11,111.20
4,345.98
270,000.00
38,700.00
127.15
John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Service
Brian Chuchua's, New Vehicle (MO 2-13-74) _
Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16
E.T.I. & Kordick, Contractor I-8-3
Electroni.c Business Machines, Office Equipment
Hemisphere Constructors, Contractor P2-21
Howard Supply Co., Tools
Huntington Beach Equipment Rentals, Tools
C. J. Madigan Truck Co., Relocate Equipment
J. Ray Construction Company, Contractor J-13
State of Calif. Board of Equalization, 1973-74 Sales Tax
Sully Miller Contracting Co., Release Retention PW-033
Twining Laboratories, Testing P2-21
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF
I-4
54,281.01
361.25
159.00
359.95
17,186.46
431.10
1,552.20
351.00
$ 399,076.74
$ 554,580.82
DISTRICT NO. 2
ACCID"1ULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF'
23466
23467
23468
23469
23470
23471
234.72
23473
23475
23476
23477
23478
23479
23480
23481
County of Orange, dompaction Tests 2-14-2
K.E.C. Company, Refund Overpayment Plans & Specs 2-18
Kasler Corporation & L.H. Woods & Sons, Contractor 2-14-2
Lowry and Associates, Construction Survey 2-14-1
C. Arthur Nissan, Litigation re Easement 2-14-1
Everett S. Schmid, Easement Appraisal 2-14~1
Sully Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 2-14-1
Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Testing 2-14-2
DISTRICT NO. 3
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF'
Boyle Engineering, Engineering re Fa.cility Relocation
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering· Service 3-18
3-20-1, 3-20-2, 3-20-3
County of Orange, Compaction Tests 3-18
The Register, Bid Notice 3-19
Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Testing 3-18
A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Saliba, Contractor 3-18
DISTRICT NO. 5
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
City of Newport Beach, Connection Fee Administration
Rewes-Schock, Contractor 5-14R-3
II
$
$
$
$
~
~
$
AMOUNT
53.75
20.00
398,337.30
7,010 ' 788~
930.00
10,526.82
3~016.00
420,682.26
880.00
30,630.25
108.57
74 ')
468~
370~895.40
402~176.42
403~056.42
1,313.75
3,314.65
$ 4,628.40
. ,. . ..
WARRANT NO.
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
23482
23483
23484
i-1L85
Galy Properties, Refund Plan Check Fee Balance $ 490.50
65.61
129.83
5,134.40
10.00
112.39
150.00
~86
23487
23488
23489
23490
23491
23492
Hollenbeck Developement, Refund Plan Check Fee Balance
Home Construction, Refund Plan Check Fee Balance
Irvine Industrial Complex, Refund Plan Check Fee Balance
Local Agency Formation Commissicn, Annexation Processing Fee
Smith Developement, Refund Plan Check Fee Balance
Valley Consultants, Refund Plan Check Fee Balance
FIXED OBLIGATION FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
City of Anaheim, Distribution of 73-74 Oil Royalties
City of Fullerton, Distribution of 73-74 Oil Royalties
City of Orange, Distribution of 73-74 Oil Royalties
City of Santa Ana, Distribution of 73-74 Oil Royalties
DISTRICT NO. 11
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Kordick and Son., Inc., Contractor 11-12
Twining Laboratories, Pipe Testing 11-12
III
$ 6,092.73
$
989.98
$ 7,082.71
$ 8,221.20
23.25
RESOLUTIONS .AND SUPPORTING. DOCUMENTS
July 10, 1974 -7:30 p.m.
AGENDA ITEM #6
CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY
CITY HALL 10200 SLATER AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
FROM THE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
RESUME
GEORGE B. SCOTT
QUALIFICATIONS: SANITATION DISTRICT 3 -2 years
DISTRICT 2 -1 year
CHAffiMAN, WATER PRICING COMMITTEE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY CITY EXPERIENCE:
PARKS & RECREATION.COMMISSION -6 ~ears
CITY COUNCIL -· 5 years
MAYOR -2 years
ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENTAL PARTICIPATION:
LEAGUE OF CITIES DELEGATE -5 years
CRIMINAL JUSTICE COUNCIL -4 years
CHAIRMAN, LEAGUE HANDICAPPED COMMITTEE
CHAIRMAN, LEAGUE BYLAWS COMMITTEE
F.V. DELEGATE TO I.C.C.
CHAIRMAN, HUMAN SER VICES COMMITTEE
MEMBER, LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE
I feel the Sanitatl.on District is a very economically and efficiently
operated organization and, if elected your Chairman, I will make
every effort to see its high standards are maintained and improved
wherever humanly possible. Supplemental agenda items will be
kept at a minimum, because one should have a chance to read the
material before it is voted upon. Executive Sessions will strictly
follow its governing policies.
-A-ALL DISTRicrrs
City of Villa Parl~
Orie Center• J 7855 Santiago Boulel1ard •Villa Park. California 92667 • (714) 998-1500
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
FOR JOINT CHAIRMAN
Submitted by
DONALD WINN
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Board Member of District No. 2 since May, 1970
Recently elected Chairman of District No. 2
Residence: Villa Park, 10 years; California, 23 years
Education: Graduate, Mechanical Engineering, University of
Texas
Occupation: Winn Equipment Company -Distributor of construction
equipment
Serving as a Director on the Orange County Sanitation Districts
for the past four years has given me an insight into the many problems
facing the Districts now and in the future. Because of the complexity
of the Districts' affairs, I feel that these years, plus my engineering
background and the experience gained in dealing with the construction
industry, will be helpful.
During the 7 years I have served on the Villa Park City Council,
the last 3 years as Mayor and Mayor Pro Tern, I have strived for sound
decisions that fairly reflect the thinking of my constituents. If
elected your Joint Chairman, I would maintain an open-minded attitude
on District business and take a neutral stand on controversial matters,
thereby inviting full discussion by all Board members. I would serve
all Districts fairly and represent, equally, our needs to the various
State and Federal governmental agencies.
I would be pleased to serve as Joint Chairman, and ask for your
support in the coming election.
Don Winn
7-10-74
AGENDA ITEM #6 -B-ALL DrsrrRICTS
RESOLUTION NO. 74-90
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR JOB NO. J-6-1
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5,·6,
7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL PUMPING
FACILITIES AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION,
JOB NO. J-6-1
* * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications, and contract
documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by John
Carollo Engineers, Districts' Engineers, for construction of ADDITIONAL
PUMPING FACILITIES AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION, JOB NO. J-6-1,
are hereby approved and adopted; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be directed to file a Notice of
Determination in accordance with the Guidelines Implementing the
California Environmental Quality Act of ~970, as amended; and,
Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to
advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the
Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and,
Section 4. That upon receipt of approval from the State Water
Resources·Control Board, the General Manager be authorized to establish
the date and time until ~hich bids will be received and publicly opened
and read; and,
Section 5. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts'
Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of
Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting peld July 10, 1974.
AGENDA ITEM #12(a) -C-ALL DISTRICTS
cou;rrY SA: J I"L\ TI o:~ DI STI~ I CTS OF OP~\~:GE COU~ffY
P. O. Box 8127 -108-l,l Ellis ,\venue
Fountain Valley, California 92103
CllA:~GE OIU>ER
C ~ 0. KO. 2
J. Ray Construction Company DATE ---Ju-ly_3_,_1_9_7 4----
JOB: Sh!)ps and Warehouse Building, Plant No. 1 -Job No. J-13
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (~'DUJ:il\.'\X) $ 20,520.54
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in th~
contract and/or contract ,.,.ork are hcrebv authorized and as compensation
therefor, the following additions to or· dc<luctions ·from the contract price are
hereby approvc<.l. ., ..
Reference:· Contractor's letters dated .July 9, 1973;
ADD:
July 23, 1973; August 7, 1973; September 12,
1973; December 11, 1973; December 24; 1973;
December 27, 1973; January 28, 1974;. April 4,
1974; April 8, 1974; April 10, 1974; and
April 30, 1974 • .
Districts' letters dated July 11, 1973;
August 10, 1973; September 4, 1973; September
18, 1973; December 19, 1973; December 28,
1973; December 31, 1973; April 22, 1974;
April 23, 1974; and June 27, 1974.
ITEM DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE
/\.
B.
c.
D.
E •.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.
~arehouse Building -Replace existing Door 12 with fire
assembly. (Building Code Requirements)
Warehouse Building -Add Door 19 in east side of
warehouse. (Building Code Requirements)
Shops "B" -Reverse door swings at Doors 13 and 15.
(Building Code Requirements)
Warehouse Building ·-Replace existing Door 11 with
fire assembly. (Building Code Requirements)
Storage -Revise wainscot at oil storage partition •.
(Building Code Requirements)
Storage Area -Provide chain link fencing. (Security)
Entrance -Add steel fencing at brick wall. (Inadequate
visibility)
Warehouse and Entrance -Cutting and removing of existing
masonry for the above. (Building Cod~ Requirements)
Warehouse and Storage -.Painting for the above changes.
(Building .Code Requirements)
Revised concrete. mix design, painting specifications, roof
specifications, added aluminum ladders, fan ducting,
changed plumbing lines, revised wall framing and
changed flashing at roof. (Facilitate construction &
add necessary features)
Install fire hydrant. (Fire Department Requirements)
Install sheet metal shroud on paint spray booth. (Fire
Department Requirements)
Install sprinkler system in paint spray booth. (Fire
Department Requirements)
Extend paving' and fencing at west end of vehicle maintenance
building. (Provide add1tional working area)
TOTAL ADD
AGENDA ITEM #12(b) D-1
•
$
.
503.70
607.20
667.00
1,431. 75
784.30
3,737.50
1,777.90
3,593.75
8SLOO
1,025.84
1,811.25
856.75
770.50
2,102.10
$20,520.54
ALL DISTRICTS
"""'
CUU.iHY 0A:UTJ\TIO:~ UlSTIUCTS 01• Ul{J\I\ut LUUr'1 l
P. o.· Box 8127 -108-l4 Ellis ,\venue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE 1 OlWER
C. 0. NO. · 2
:oNTRACTOR: J. Ray Construction Company ... ---------------------DATE July 3, 1974
JOB: Shops and Warehouse Building, Plant No. 1 -Job ·No. J-13
t_.cnsion of Contract Time
The Contractor is hereby granted an extension
of time to complete the above changes, allow
for delivery time required for cranes, and
for inclement weather
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION
Sununary of Contract Time
Original Contract Date.
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Total Time Extension
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion D~te
Original Contract Price
Prev. Au th. Changes
242 Calendar Days
242 Calendar Days
May 19, 1973
180 Calendar Days
November 15, 1973
242 Calendar Days
422.Calendar Days
July 15, 1974
$ 1,119,712.00
$ (57,723.00)
This Change (ADD) f m~~\(~;r~ $ 20,520.54
Aracnclcd
DOc1 -1 authorization <late: July 10, 1974
~
By
----~-----------~C-o_n_s_u~l-t~i-n-g·--cE~.1-1g-1~1-1_e_c_r
lly
--------------------------,--..~~----Contractor
AGENDA ITEM #12(b) D-2
Contract Price s 1,082,509.54
Approved:
COU~TY SANITATimJ DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
ALL DISTRICTS
Testing Engineers, Incorporated
Hr. Ray E. Lewis
Chief Engineer
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, Calif. 92708
Subject: In-Plant Inspection for
Fiscal Year, 1974-1975.
Dear Mr. Lewis:
June.20, 1974
Testing Engineers is very interested in providing the necessary
in-plant inspection service for the S2ni·tation Districts for the
fiscal year 1974-1975. With our experience in working with you
the past year and our personnel, we feel that we are well quali-
fied to perform this service for you.
Testing Engineers would supply a qualified inspector at each of
the pipe plants on a full time basis or as needed. Mr. Louis
Perley, Supervisor of Pipe, would also spend some time at each
·plant supervising the operations, as well as working with_ your
staff. A daily log would be kept en each size, class and num-
ber of pipe produced, and a weekly report would be issued to you
covering this information.
We presently have on our staff six inspectors, with pipe inspec-
tion experience besides Mr. Louis Perley. Mr. Perley has had
twenty-five years experience, three of the inspectors have more
than twenty years, two have ten to fifteen years experience, and
one has about five years.
A copy of the final report that would be sent to you is enclosed.
This is the same as we have been using for you this past year.
Testing Engineers agrees to furnish a qual-ified inspector for .
thirteen dollars ($13.0~) per hour. The standard terms and con-
d i t i on s as sh m·m on P a 9 e 3 of t he c n c 1 o se d fee sch e du 1 e w i 1 1
apply. Supervision by Mr. Perley at $13.00 per hour, not to
exceed t\·tenty hours per week. Bused on a one hundred and sixty-
ei ght (168) hour month, one man at each of two plants, plus su-
pervision, the monthly figure should be ~pproxirnately $5'~94.00
per month. This wi 11 increase or decrease directly to the hours
worked.
11008 South Norwalk Blvd . Santa Fe Sprin_gs. Ca 906 70 • 213-941-3291 • Oakland. Santa Clara. San Diego
AGENDA ITEM #12(c) E-1 ALL DISTRICTS
Mr. Ray E. Lewi' s -2-June 20, 1974
The aoove rates include the following:
(1) One inspector per manufacturing plant.
(2) All initial reports.
(3) A forty (40) hour straight time week.
(4) No over-time, unless approved by the Sanitation Districts
pri·or to work.
(5) Rates for over-time wil1 be $17.25 per hour for work in ex-
cess of eight hours in one day and Saturdays. Also, $21.25
per hour will be charged for work performed .on Sundays or
Ho! i days.
(6) This sched~le of fees will be effective from July 1, 1974
to June 30, 1975.
We appreciate the County Sanitation Districts consideration of
Testing Engineers and the opportunity of submitting this pro-
posal. We hope that \ale can continue the relationshi·p that.has
been established this past year. If there are any questions,
please give me a call.
Encl: copy of final re ort
1 fee schedule LA TEI 7)
JHD:ks
#682
AGENDA ITEM #J.2(c) E-2 ALL DISTRICTS
M E M 0 R A N D U M
Jul~ 2, 1974
TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager
FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
'· O. BOX 1127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92709
(714) S-40-2910
(714) 962-2411
SUBJECT: In-Plant Pipe Inspection Services for the Construction of Sewer Pipe
Fiscal Year 1974-75
The Sanitation Districts have, for several years, employed the services of
outside testing laboratories for the purpose of providing in-plant pipe
inspection for all District trunk sewer faci 1i tics and for those, as required,
for treatment facility projects. The retention of outside consulting services
is, in my opinion, in the best interest of the Districts because of fluctuations
in services required and inequities which would be created if qualified personnel
were incorporated in the Districts' permanent ·staff.
During the past fiscal year, the combined Districts' have expended $47,887.00
for in-plant pipe line inspection. The services have been performed by Testing
Engineers, Inc. of Santa Fe Springs.
I have solicited proposals from five qualified .testing laboratories and received
proposals from two firms interested in providing the necessary services for the
1974-75 fiscal year. These propcsals, as subcittcd, were predicated· upon the
services required for the proposed schedule of work for this fiscal year (see
copy attached). It is estimated, based on prior services provided, that the
in-plant pipe inspection services for the ensuing year will be approximately
$66,000.00 for all projects required for the combined Distric~s and the Joint
Works.
In careful review of the two proposals submitted and the qualifications thereof,
it is my rccor.imendation that the Sanitation Districts e~ploy Testing Engineers, Inc.
to perform all in-plant pipe inspection as required at the fee schedule as
stipulated in their proposal. The testing services provided by this· firm du=ing
the past fiscal year have been very satisfactory and the charge for qualified
inspectors is $2.00 per hour less than the rate quoted in the other proposal.
CONTRACT NO.
3-18
3-20-1
3-20-2
3-20-3
2-14-2
2-14-3
2-18
AGENDA ITEM #12(c)
PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF ~ORK
IN-PLA.\'T PIPE INSPECTION
1974-75 FISCAL YEAR
PIPE SIZE
63"
96"
66"
72"
72"
78"
63"
48"
51"
66"
60"
51"
39"
E-3
LINEAR FEET
2,400
3,000
18,400
8,250
8,000
3,000
3,000
6,000
1,000
2,670
1,320
2,430
600
ALL DISTRJ.C'I1S
CUUi~-l )' ~i\:~ I T1\T Io:~ JH !>Tl: l l:T!j 01· {}}:.1\:;L.J~ LUIJ;, ! _l
P. 0, Box 3127 -10;).l·l Elli:; ,\v(·11uc
Fount a in Va 11 c y, Ca 1 if or n i a ~} Z 7 0 8
c. 0. :.:o.
:o:\Tl~CTOil:Donov~n Construction Co. of Minnesota ----------~--------DJ\ TE July 10, 1974
101~:46 MGD Activated Sludge Plant at Reclamation Plant No. 1 -Job No. Pl-16
Arilount of this Ch:inl!c Or<lcr (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 0.00
~ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the
:ontr3ct ~rntl/or contract ,.;ark arc hereby authori:.cc.l :in<l as .c01:ipcnsation
th c r c r 0 r , t ;lC f 0110 wing a cl di ti 0 n s t 0 0 r d c <l u c ti 0 n s fr 0 m th C' c 0 n tract pr i cc arc
llcrcb)· approvctl. :· .
Incorporation of Federal Wage Requirements
#AQ-1094 dated March 22, 1974 per Parf. B
Approval Letter dated June 13, 1974 from
the State Water Resources Control Board.
..
Original Contract Price $ 29,876,000.00
Hoard authorization date:
July 10, 1974
By--------------~~------~-------C on s ult 1ng Engineer
By------------------------~-:----:-----C on tract or
AGENDA ITEM #12(d)
Prev. Auth. Changes $ ____ 0_. _00 __
This Change (ADD)(DEDUCT) $ 0.00
----~~-----~--
A~cndcd Contract Price s 29,876,000.00
-F-
ApprovcJ:
COU:\TY SANITATIO:J DISTRICTS of
Orange County, ·California
By ____________________ _,_ __ _,_-.-~--~
.Clu el Ln g l lle c
ALL DIS'TRICTS
RESOLUTION NO. 74-91
ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO GUIDELINES
IMPLEMENTING THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT OF 1970, AS AMENDED
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE DISTRICTS'
GUIDELINES IMPLEMENTING THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT OF 1970, AS AMENDED
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, on the 14th day of March, 1973, pursuant to Resolution
No. 73-26, the Boards did adopt.Guidelines Implementing the California
Environmental Quality Act, which Guidelines were based upon State
Environmental Guidelines promulgated by the Secretary of Resources;
and,
WHEREAS, on March 22, 1974, the State Environmental Guidelines .._,,
were amended to implement an amendment made to the California Environ-
mental Quality Act of 1970, effective March 4, 1974; and,
WHEREAS, Public Resources Code Section 21082 requires that
local environmental procedures shall be consistent with State
Environmental Guidelines.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY DETERMINED AND ORDERED:
That Amendment.No. 2 to the Guidelines Implementing the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Amended, is hereby
adopted by these Boards as an amendment to the environmental guidelines
of these Districts.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1974.
AGENDA ITEM #12(e) -G-ALL DISTRICTS
~UUn l I J.'\.l l 1 i\ l l U~" JJ l ~> i I~ J l. I~ lll' UJ:;\;,l1L LUU.~! J
P. O •. Box 8127 -1013·l•l Elli~ ,\venue
Fountain Valley, California ~J2708
CIIA:--1GE OIU>i:R
. c. 0. :-:o. 3
:o:\TP~CTOil: Hemisphere Constructors. Inc. ~--~--~~~----~~ D/\TE July 3, 1974
roll: Digestcrs "N" and "0" at Plant No. 2 -Job No. P2-21
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (Xi.Olxt'iax) $ 860.36
, In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the
:onrtact an<l/or contract \·:ark arc hereby authorized anc.l as cor:1pcnsation
:hcircfor, the following additions to or dcc.luctions from tl1c contract price arc
icrc by a pprovc<l. • ..
.
Reference: Contractor's letters dated December"~6, 1973;
Add:
March 22, 1974 and May 3, 1974.
Districts' letters dated December 31, 1973;
January 23, 1974 and May 1, 1974.
Revise vent in compressor building ADD
Install paving by Pflanz Headworks ADD
TOTAL ADD
~
Extension of Contract Time
The Contractor is hereby granted an extension
of time for delayed delivery of equipment
TOTAL TIME EXi:ENSION
Summary of Contract Time
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Total Time Extension
· Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
.. -· .....
:
Original Contract Price
Prev. Au th. Changes
$254.06
606.30
$860.36
117 Calendar Days
117 Calendar Days
January 25, 1973
300 Calendar Days
·November 21, 1973
252 Calendar Days
552 Calendar Days
July 31, 1974
$ 1,068,413.00
$ 8,101.62
This Change (ADD) [DWN~) $ 860.36
Amended Contract Price s 1,077,374.98
Hoard authorization date:. July 10, 1974
By ______________ -r-----.~----~---
C ons ul ting Eng i1"iCC'r
By----------------------,~~----~~ Contractor
AGENDA ITEM #1£igj_ -H-
Approved:
COU!\TY SJ\NITATIO?~ DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California ~
By ____________________ _....__,--.---.--~
.Ch1cT Enr.1nc:c
ALL DISTRICTS
'
PROGRESS REPORT
TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O.BOX8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
I-8-3 -INFLUENT METERING AND DIVERSION STRUCTURE -($1,503,679.00)
INFLUENT CHA.~NEL: Complete
INFLUENT PIPING: Euclid and Sunflower Trunk bypasses in service. Completed
junction structures on Newhope-Placentia and District No. 1 trunk lines.
Interplant Influent Interceptor, Ellis Force Main, Newhope-Placentia, and
Sunflower Trunks have been connected to structure.
METERING A.~D DIVERSION STRUCTIJRE: Gates to be installed this month.
Electrical wiring continuing.
Contract approximately 91 percent complete to date:.
J-13 -SHOPS AND WAREHOUSE FACILITIES -($1,061,989)'
SHOP A: Building essentially completed. Correcting punch list items.
SHOP B: Compiling punch list. Equipment in this building to be tested.
WAREHOUSE: Change order work to comply with buil~ing code requirements to be
completed this month.
SITE: Paving, curbs, gutters and fence compl.ete. Irrigation system installed.
Contract approximately 99 percent complete to date.
Pl-16 -46 MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 -($29,876,000)
PILING: Contractor submitted piling shop drawings. . PIPING: Contractor submitting· piping shop drawings and V.C.P. is on site.
EARTHWORK: Preliminary earthwork complete. Road from Garfield removed.
First month of contract.
P2-20 -POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT PLANT NO. 2 -($158,294)
No further onsite work is expected until sufficient equipment has been
delivered to complete peripheral lighting and control installations.
Unit substation delivery not expected before July.
Contract approximately 58 percent complete to date.
AGENDA ITEM #12(j) I-1 ALL DISTRICTS
Progress Report
Treatment Plant Projects
Page Two
P2-21 -DIGESTERS "N" AND "0" AT PLANT NO. 2 -($1,076,514)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
1084.C ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71.C) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
DIGESTERS "N" AND "O": Digesters have been fille_d with water for testing.
DIGESTER CONTROL BUILDING: Installing piping, electrical and instrumentation.
Steam and hot water pipes being insulated.
TUNNELS: Painting of piping complete.
DIGESTER GAS COMPRESSORS: Compressors in service and room has been painted.
STORM WATER PUMP STATION: Structurally complete. ·Having difficulty with pump
delivery.
Contract approximately 98 percent complete to date •
.._..,TREATMENT PLANT WORK
Total Value Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Total Work During June
Total Work Under Design
DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK
Total Value Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Total Work During June
Total Work Under Design
$33,676,476
3,425,335
110,167
800,000
$23,447,279
17,647,324
873,451
19,809,040
TOTAL A.~IOUNT UNDER CONTRACT & DESIGN
July 3, 1974
AGENDA ITEM #12(j) I-2
$33,676,476
800,000
$23,447,279
19,809,040.
$77,732,795
ALL DISTR!CTS
~VUH 1 l vJ\d 1 l /\ l l v.1 111.> l h J \, l J \Jj" \JI .J\o\\.JI. ~VV•' I I
P. o. Box 8127 -10o·l 1l Elli!,; AvC'nuc
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CJIA~GE OIU>~R
c.o. :\0. 14
:o:~TRACTOR: Sully-Miller Contracting Company DATE ___ J_u_l_y_3-.~1-9-74 ______ __
JOB:Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Ave., Contract No. 2-14-1
Amount of this Change Order ~Xln) (DEDUCT) $ 14,970.00
In accord an cc with contract p r·o vis ions , th c f o 11 owing cha n g cs in the
:'O 1) tract an <l Io r contra c t work arc h c r c by author i : c c.l an c.l as co 1:-t pc n sat ion '-""
:hcrcfor, the following additions to or deductions from thq contract price arc
tcrcby approvc<l. • ..
ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES
"Add:
Change Est'd Quant.
Item No. Unit From To
49 L.F.
Deduct:
40 V.F.
41 V.F.
44 V.F.
47 Each . 51 Each
54
. 254
101
15
1
6
59
222.6
89.5
13.2
0
5
Difference·
S @ $16.00/L.F.
Total Add:
31.4 @ $250.00/V.F.
11.5 @ $280.00}V.F.
1.8 @ $300.00/V.F.
1 @ $3,000.00/Each
1 @ $440.00/Each
Total Deduct:
TOTAL DEDUCT
.·
$ 80.00
$7,850.00
3-, 220. 00
540.00
3,000.00
440.00
Original Contract Price
Prcv. Auth. Changes
$ ·80.00
15,050.00
$14,970.00
$ 6,274,608.40
$ 1,560,118.32
This Change 0\'ffJ) (DEDUCT) $ ------14,970.00
~mended Contra~t Price '-" s 7,819,756.72
Board authorization date:. July 10, 1974 ApprovcJ:
COUt\TY SJ\NITATIO!~ DISTRICTS of
0 rang c County , .Ca 1 i for n i a •
By------------~----~----....----~~ Consulting Engineer
By--------------------..,.-:-~~=-=-::~ Contractor
By ____________________ ~,__,--r--__ ~
.ClncT Enr,1ncc
AGENDA ITEM #12(1) ·-J-
w V VI' ' I '-1 J \ • t ' I I\ l l \.J •' JI J. "J l I ' J \ • J ~ \ 11 V i .J \. t U J • ~ V v a 1 & &
P. O. Box 8127 · -100·l'l Elli~ ,\vC'nuc
Fountain Valley, Ca.lifornia 92708
CllA:-JGE OlU>i: R
c. 0. :w. 15
DATE -J.;;..;;u ..... 1_y_3-.-l 9_7_4_
.
:·o:~·t11AC:t 0 R: _s_u_l_I .... r_-~_·11_· l_l_e_r_Co_n_t_r_a_· c_t_i n....lg""--C_o_m __ p_a n_..y'------
JOB:Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Ave., Contract No. 2-14.-1
Amount of this Change Order (AD\X) ~Mmx:t~ $ 0.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the
::'0~3ct an<l/or contract work arc hereby authori:c<l ant! as c01:tpcnsation
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from t11c contract price arc
ncrcby approved. • ..
Extension of Contract Time
The Contractor is hereby granted an
extension of time due to inclement
we·ather
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION
Summary of Contract Time
..
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Or.iginal Completion Date
Total Extension of Contract Time
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
..
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
18 Calendar Days
18 Calendar Days
September 21, 1972
630 Calendar Days
June 12, 1974 ·
18 Calendar Days
648 C~lendar Days
June. 30, 1974
$6,274,608.40
$1,545,148.32
This Change (\~) ~~mm:i) $
------~~--~---
0.00
Board authorization date: July 10, 1974
By---------------------~-------r-r---------Cons ult 1 ng Engineer
By ____________________ __,~-:----~~
Contractor
AGENDA ITEM #12(1)
Amended Contract Price s1,s19,7s6.12
.-K-
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATim~ DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California ~
By--------------------------~ .ClucT tnr, 1ncc
DISTRICT 2
RESOLUTION NO. 74-93-2
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-14-1 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO.
2-14-1 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL
CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Sully-Miller Contracting Company,
has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the
contract for the SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR FROM RECLAMATION PLANT
NO. 1 TO KATELLA AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-1, on the 30th of June,
1974; and,
Section 2. That by letter, Lowry & Associates, District's
engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been
completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred
in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby
received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation
Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, is hereby accepted
as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor,
dated the 21st day of September, 1972; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized
and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Sully-Miller
Contracting Company setting forth the terms and conditions for
acceptance of said Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant
No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, -is hereby approved; and,~
Section 7, That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of
Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement
on behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a reGular meeting held July 10, 1974.
AGENDA ITEM #12(m) -L-DISTRICT 2
w V V i\ ! l v J \ d .1 l J \ 1 l \.) , 'I J J .1 ") j I , J \ , J ..) \ I l" \J i • .J \ • t ~ Jl • \..., V U • \ ' 1.
P. O. Box 8127 -l08-l 1l Elli!.i .\vc-nuc
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CIIJ\~GE OlWER
Kasler Corporation &
:O~\TRACTOR: L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc., A Joint Venture
c.o. :\0. 1
--..:.---------~~----~ DATE · July 3. 1974
rOB:~Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer from Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-2
Amount of this Change Order ~!Vn) ~1Nxtn:OO) $ 0.00
, ~ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the
:ontract an<l/or contract work arc hereby nuthorizc<l anc.l as cor:1pensation
:hercfor, the following additions to or dc<luctions from the contract price arc
iercby approvc<l.
The Contractor shall be allowed as an· alternate method
to construct pilot tunnels, place a concrete pad with
rails.-in the tunnel and then j~ck the reinforced concrete
sewer pipe along the concrete pad. This method is in
lieu of jacking various diameter casings in the areas
designated on t-Oe plans then jacking the reinforced
concrete pipe into the casings. All jacked pipe shall
be p er i p h er a 11 y gr o u t e d • A 11 work w i 11 b e a cc om p 1 i s·h e d
with the sanction of any other agency involved. Payment
will be made on the basis of the jacked casing uni~ price
plus the jacked pipe unit price as stated in the Contract
and at no additional cost to the District. This Change ln
Method.does not apply to the tunnel under the Riverside
Freeway or the casing under the Southern Pacific Railroad
track.?_~-----· ____ ·-. _____ . __
~ext ens ion·s -of time wi 11 be granted for the change in
the method of construction as described in this Change
Order.
Original Contract Price $3,545,635.33
Prev. Auth. Changes $ _________ o_._o_o~~
This Change Q\\~) (DJIDUtxlq $
----------~--~~
o.oo
Amended Contract Price $3,545,635.33
Hoard authorization date:. July 10, 1974 Approved:
By ______________ ~---y--.---~-----~
Consulting Engineer
By--------------------~~-:-~-:--~ Contractor
AGENDA ITEM #12(n) . -M-
COU!\TY SJ\NITATim~ DISTRICTS of
Orange County, -California ~
By _________________________ __..--~.--~
.chic-I Eng in cc
DISTRICT 2
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
.......... P.O. BOX 8127
1084'4' ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
2-14-1
MEMORANDUM
July 3, 1974
Fred A. Harper, General Manager
Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contracts Nos. 2-14-1 & 2-14-2
(714) 5-40-2910
(71-') 962-2-411
Work on this project complete and final inspection to be scheduled for early next
week. ~
2-14-2
Work continues for the most part on schedule. The Contractor did not start work
on Grove Street due to the pending strike. No work will be done at· this location "-11
until it can be accomplished without any shutdowns or delays. The 78" pipe is
complete through the encasement across the river to the south portal of the tunnel
under the Riverside Freeway. Currently work is being done in the vicinity of
Ball Road. Work at the tunnel under the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks north
of Katella is held up due to a shortage of tunnel liner plate.
REL: BEW: ss
..
AGENDA ITEM #12(0) N-1 DISTRICT 2
:x::.
0 ( ( t:i::J z
t:J ::r>
H
1-3
t:i::J
~
::;t:
I-'
(\.)
...........
0 ...._
CON1t<.AC1 ~ '2-14-1 ~ S~NTA ANA RlVfR lNi~CC'PTO~·
----...... _ CDMPlJ:\f
00000 -roe~ CON51Rucrro
~UUn l I 0.:\.4ll1\' 1 u ... JJ 1 :> j t~ j \. J ::> u1· lJ!'..i\ • .i. .. 1J: \..UU., I I
P. O. Box 3127 -lOd·l•l Ell i!.j ,\vc·nuc
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CJIA>:GE OlU>ER c.o·. :\o. 3
---~~~~~----~--~ DATE July 3. 1974
A. G. Tutor Co., Inc.
:o:\Tl~CTOR: and N. M. Saliba Company, a Joint Venture
JOll: Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18
Amount of this Change Order µ!MX) (OOM~) $ o.oo
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in th~
c:'ou tract an<l/ or contract work a re here by author i z c<l and as co::tpcnsa t ion
therefor, the following· additions to or de<luctions from the contract price arc
hereby approve<.!. • ..
Reference: Contractor's letter to District
dated June 27, 1974
Extension of Contract Time
The Contractor is hereby granted an
extensi-0n of time for lost ·time due
to a strike of the pipe company
truck drivers
Summary of Contract Time
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Previous Time Extension
Total Time Extension
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION
.·
39 Calendar Days
39 Calendar Days
June 1, 1973
360 Calendar Days
May 27, 1974
89 Calendar Days
128 Calendar Days
488 Calendar Days
October 2, 1974
Original Contract Price $ 4 J 334 '412. 00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 -------
This Change ~~~~~ nu::num~ $ ___ o_.o_o_· .....,;-
Amended Contra~t Piice s 4,334,412.00
Hoard authorization date: July 10, 1974 Approvc<l:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By------------~--·---..-.-----~---~~ Consulting Engineer
By--------------------~-:-~~~ Contractor
By_·-------------------------------~ .ClncJ Ln~ inct.
AGENDA ITEM #12(0) ·-O-DISTRICT ~
RESOLUTION NO. 74-94-3
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH
CITY OF STANTON TO INCORPORATE CITY STORM
DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS INTO CONTRACT
FOR KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 5 & 6 2
CONTRACT NO. 3-20-1
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF STANTON TO
INCORPORATE CONSTRUCTION OF CITY STORM DRAIN
AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS INTO CONTRACT FOR
KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 5 & 6, CONTRACT
NO. 3-20-1
* * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3
of Orange County, California,
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the City of Stanton has requested that County Sanitation
District No. 3 enter into an agreement for the joint construction
of sewer and storm drain facilities and street improvements in Knott
Avenue from the southerly city limits to the northerly city limits; and
WHEREAS, it appears that substantial cost savings can be
·realized by the joint construction of proposed sewer facilities of
County Sanitation District No. 3 and proposed storm drain facilities
and street improvements of the City of Stanton; and,
WHEREAS, the City has offered to reimburse County Sanitation
District No. 3 for the City's proportionate share of all costs of the
joint construction project;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY DETERMINED AND ORDERED:
Section 1. That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 3 does hereby approve that certain agreement, dated
July 10, 1974, between County Sanitation District No. 3 and the City
of Stanton to incorporate the City's proposed storm drain facilities
and street ~mprovements in Knott Avenue from the southerly city limits
to the northerly city limits of the City of Stanton into the District's
proposed Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 & 6, Contract No. 3-20-1, and
providing for reimbursement of City's cost to the District; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are
hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement, in form
approved by the General Counsel, on behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1974.
AGENDA ITEM #12(q) -P-DISTRICT 3
f
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
M E M 0 R A N D U M
July 3, 1974
Fred A. Harper, General Manager
Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
Knott Interceptor, Contract No. 3-18
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108'4.tf ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71'4) 540-2910
(71.tf) 962-2'4 I l ~
Work has proceeded to 1600 feet north of Bolsa on Hoover. Also
completed is the section from the north end of the pipe laid under
Contract 3-18-1 through the tunnel at Hazard. Grouting within
the tunnel at Hazard is now taking place.
The Laborers and Carpenters are due to go on strike this week.
This will probably shut the job done.
REL:BEW:ss
AGENDA ITEM #12(r) Q-1 DISTRICT 3
() ()
}':)o o
J> "11 ~ z -t ~ -<
60LD~N
CC"CU~wooo
ST.
ST.
wVUH' I ~J\., l l J\ l 1 u.~ JJ l :, 1 1~ J l. J :J Ul' U!'.J\ .• lJJ: LUU., J I
P. O. Box 8127 -lOi.->·l 1l Elli~ ,\vC'nuc
Fountain Valley, California ~2708
CIIA:lGE OIWER c. 0. :.:o. 1
DATE -J-u~l-y---3-.~1-9_7_4--~-:o:,TRACTOR: Rewes-Schock, JV, A Joint Venture
roll: Mmhole Replacement and Repair, Contract No. 5-14R-3
Amount of this ChJ.ngc Order ~19 ~JJ>mIK}: $.0.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the'-"'
:'oi:itrac t anu/ or contract \·:ork arc hereby authori z c<l an<l as co1:ipcnsa t ion
;hcrcfor, the following· additions to or dc<luctions from tl1c contract price arc
lcrcbr approved. • ..
Change in standard specifications provisions -
fire insurance not applicable to ·this _project. $0.00
.·
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
$24,079.ZQ
$ 0.00
This Change ~ ~tn~ $ 0. 00 .._ __,
---------·~~-~wrJ'-·
Amended Contract Price 524,079.29 ----
Hoard authorization date: July 10, 1974 Approved:
COU!,iTY SANITATimJ Ill STRIC:'S of
Orange County, California "
By ____________ -,:~---~---,.--~~~ Consulting Engineer
By---------------------,-r-=-~~~ Contractor
By
----------------------.-c-h~1-c_T...._L~r-1r,_1_11
AGENDA ITEM #12(s) .-R-DISTRICT 5
,....""'_ ..... ".,.,.& ... ,,.£'-J•• .,£., ............ ._J '"' ,,, ... , •• "' •• '4'-'-•ll••
P. O. Box 8127 -lOo·l'l Elli~ ,\venue
Fountain Valley, California ~2708
CJIA~GE OlW~R
C. 0. i\O.
Kordick and Soni Inc. --=---------DATE July 3, 1974
JOll: Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension, Contract No. 11-12
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) CfiL'i}{ID!{) $5,015.00
. In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the
:bnYract a.nu/or contract l·:ork arc hereby authorized an<l as co1:ipcnsation
:hcrcfor, the following a<lditions to or deductions from the. contract price arc
lCrcby approvc<l. • ..
. Add:
Item No.
6
7
Adjustment of Quantities
Change Est'd Quant.
Unit From To
V.F.
V. R.
10
80
23
100
Board uuthorization date:. July 10, 1974
By------------------------~----r--------Cons ult 1ng Engineer
By-----------------------,~-:-~~~ Contractor
AGENDA ITEM #12(u)
13 @ $1 7 5 . 0 0 /V .. p •
20 @ $137.00/V.F.
TOTAL ADD
:
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
$2,275.00
2,740.00
$5,015.00
$419,000.SO
$ S,666.88
This Chanec (ADD) C'DOO{~) $ 5, 015. O O
Amended Contr~ct Price s 429,682.38
I -S-
Approved:
COUI\TY Si\NITATimJ DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By _________________________ ..,_~~---~-
,C ln cT. Lnr,1ncc
DISTRH~rr 11
RESOLUTION NO. 74-95-11
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 11-12 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO.
11-12 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL
CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of
Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Kordick and Son, Inc., has
completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract
for SLATER AVENUE TRUNK SEWER EXTENSION, CONTRACT NO. 11-12, on the
30th of June, 1974; and,
Section 2. That by letter, Keith & Associates, District's
engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been
completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred
in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby
received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension, Contract
No. 11-12, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the
terms of the contract therefor, dated the 24th day of January, 1974;
and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized
and directed to execute~a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Kordick and
Son, Inc. setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of
said Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension, Contract No. 11-12, is
hereby approved; and,
Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of
Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement
on behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1974.
AGENDA ITEM #12(v) -T-DISTRICT 11
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
M E M 0 R A N D U M
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
C. Arthur Nisson,
General Counsel
June 27, 1974
Conflict of Interests
The Act under which a local district, such as a
County Sanitation District, may enact guidelines to implement
the Governmental Conflict of Interests Act has been declared
constitutional by the California Supreme Court. This Act has
also been repealed as of January 7, 1975 by the adoption of
Proposition 9, an initiative known as the "Political Reform
Act of 1974".
The Districts are subject to the existing Governmental
Conflict of Interests Ac.t, hereinafter called "GCIA", until
January 7, 1975. Under this Act the Districts may adopt guide-
lines. By adopting guidelines any "public official" who is
sued for a violation of the GCIA will be exerr.pt from the civil
penalties described in Government Code §3751 and §3753 if the
official attempts in good faith to comply with the guidelines
if adopted.
The civil penalties from which the public official
may become exempt are:
§3751:
"(c) If it is determined that a violation of
Section 3625 has occurred, and if the public
official who committed the violation realized
an economic benefit as a result of the action or
decision, the court may impose a penalty against
the public official of up to three times the value
of the benefit.
"(d) If it is determined that an interest which
should have been disclosed in the report required by
Section 3700 was omitted, the court may impose a
penalty of up to three times the value of the
omitted interest."
§3753:
"A violation of any provision of this division
shall be groundsfor forfeiture of office as
AGENDA ITEM #14(a) U-1 ALL DISTRICTS
provided in Section 1700 of the Government
Code and for disqualification from holding
public off ice as provided in Section 1021 of
the Government Code."
If guidelines are adopted, the Act does not require
that public officials of local agencies, such as County Sanita-
tions Districts, need file a disclosure of interests; however,
such disclosure may be made a requirement of local guidelines.
If no disclosure is required under local guidelines, there can
be no mistake in failing to list an interest for which the
penalty set forth in §375l(d) is provided.
In considering this matter, an analysis of the risks
as "public officials" of a County Sanitation District should be
made:
1. A County Sanitation District is not primarily
a governing body and does not concern itself primarily with
legislation. The only ordinances and resolutions adopted
have to do with the regulation and use of sewerage facilities.
2. During the period when these guidelines can
be effective {July 10, 1974 to January 7, 1975) little, if any,
"legislation" of the type a County Sanitation District can en-
act is contemplated.
3. Any public official of a County Sanitation
District can easily spot any potential or actµal conflict
of interest arid disclosure of such interest at a meeting or
relative to the matter pending is not difficult. In other
words, "conflict of interest" is not difficult to recognize
_by any individual acting in good faith.
4. The elections affecting public officials of
a County Sanitation District are conducted by other govern-
mental agencies whose disclosure requirements are set forth
in the Act and are different from those of a County Sanitation
District.
In summary, actual exposure seems remote during the
next 4 1/2 months. ·The public right to know about a candidate's
financial interests will in no way be reduced or hampered if
no County-Sanitation District guidelines or disclosure require-
ments are adopted.
The GCIA defines the term "public official" as
follows: "any elective or appointive officer of· any public
agency". Under previously adopted guidelines, which have been
suspended, a determination was made and these officials were
listed, however, the definition of a public officer as construed
-2-
AGENDA ITEM #14(a) U-2 ALL DISTRICTS
by the courts leaves some doubt as to whether or not the
prior listing in our resolutions did not go beyond the intent
~-of the Act.
In the case of Coulter vs Pool (1921) 187·C 181,
the Court said a public officer, as distinguished from a
public employee, is that "a public duty is delegated and en-
trusted to him as agent, the performan~e of which is an exercise
of a part of the governmental functions of the particular political
unit of which he, as agent, is acting." Characteristics of
a public official are a fixed tenure of position, exaction of
a public oath of office, an official bond (sometimes), liability
to be called to account as a public offender for misfeasance or
nonfeasance of office.
The case of Spreckles vs Graham (1924)· 194 C 516
stated that there were two elements universally regarded as.
essential to the definition of what a public official was.
First, a tenure of office which is.not transient, occasional
or incidental. The office is an entity for which incumbents
succeed each other and the off ice does not cease to exist
with the termination of incumbency. Second, the delegation
of some portion of the chosen functions of government.
After January 7, 1975 under the Political Reform
Act of 1974, the Districts will be required to adopt and
promulgate a conflict of interests code, however, i~ provides
that no conflict of interests code shall be effective until
it has been approved by the code reviewing board. In this
case, that would be the Board of Supervisors. Each agency shall
submit a proposed conflict of interests.code by the deadline
established for the agency by the Supervisors. The deadline
for any agency in existence on April 1, 1975 shall not be
earlier than April 1, 1976. It, therefore, appears that
although it will be an actionable offense for any public
official to participate in making or in any way attempt to
use his official position to influence a governmental decision
in which he knows or has reason to know he has a financial
interest, there will be no special conflict of interest code
for the Sanitation Districts until some time after April 1,
1976.
"Public official 11
, as defined in the Political
Reform Act of 1974 is as follows Government Code §8204.
"Agency official 11 means any member, officer, employee or
consultant of any state agency who as a part of his official
responsibilities participates in any administrative action
in any other than purely clerical, secretarial or ministerial
capacity.
In view of the foregoing, my recommendations are:
-3-
AGENDA ITEM #14(a) U-3 ALL DISTRIC 1I1S
(1) That you do not adopt any guidelines during
the interim 4 1/2 month period.
(2) That you adopt the guidelines proposed without
the inclusion of the "disclosure" requirements. ·
CAN:ac
AGENDA ITEM #14(a)
Respectfully submitted,
L~~~
c. Arthur Nissen,
General Counsel
-4-
ALL DISTRICTS
' .
(PASJED BY DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3 & 11 ONLY)
RESOLUTION NO. 74-52
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COU!JTY S:\iJ ri,\ri'ION Dl.:'.THICTS i·WS. 1, 2, 3,
AND 11 OF OHi\UGE COUN11 Y ADOP':lING GUIDELINES
FOR THE Il:IPLEf·lEr,:TATION OF THE GOVERNMENTAL
CONFLIC?S OF INTEREST ACT
* * * * * * * * * * *
BE IT RESOLVED by the Boards of Directors of the County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 11 of Orange County,
California:
SECTION 1. PURPOSE AND EFFECT
Pursuant to Section 3626 of the Government Code (all section
references herein are to the Government Code unless otherwise
specified), the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 11 of Orange County, California hereby
adopt the following guidelines for their public officials in
determining whether they have an economic interest or interests
which are in substantial conflict with their official duties and
powers und~r Subdivision (a) of Section 3625 and in determining
whether they have an economic interest in matters for purposes of
Subdivision (b) of Section 3625.
Nothing contained in this resolution is intended to modify or
abridge the provisions of the Governmental Conflicts of In~erest Act
(Section 3600 et seq.'), Sectionsl090-1097; or any other provisions
of law pertaining to conflicts of interest. This resolution shall
be interpreted in a manner consistent therewith. Nothing contained
herein shall be deemed adopted pursuant to or in implementation of
Section 3603 or Section 3704.
SECTION 2. DESIGNATION OF OFFICIALS
The "public officials," "officials," and "elective and
appointive officers" subject to the provisions of Section 3625 are:
AGENDA ITEM #14(c) V-1 EACH DISTLICT
1. Board of Directors
2. General Mana~er
3. Chief Engineer
4. Secretary
5. County Auditor acting as ex officio Auditor of
the Districts
6. Director of Finance of the J.A.O.
7. General Counsel
SECTION 3. SUBSTANTIAL CONFLICT
Ao An official shall not be deemded to have an economic
interest in substantial conflict with the proper exercise of an
official's duties within the meaning of Government Code Section
3625(a) if he has only a "remote economic in.terest" and if the fact
of such interest is disclosed to the body or Board of the District
and noted ·in its official records, and the official in no way
attempts to influence any other public official of the District
with respect to any matter concerning such remote economic interest.
As used in this section, the term "remote economic interest"
means:
1. TQat of a non-salaried member or officer of a non-profit
corporation;
2. That of a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee or
holder of any position of management in any business entity contracting
with the District if such business entity has ten or more other
employees and if the officer was an employee or agent of said entity
for at least three years prior to his initially accepting his office.
For purposes of this subsection, time of employment with the business
entity by the officer shall be counted in computing such three-year
period even though such entity has been converted from one form of
business organization to a different form of business organization
within three years of the initial taking of office by such officer.
Time of employment in such case shall be counted only if, after the
transfer or change in organization, the real or ultimate ownership
for the contracting party is the same or substantially similar to
AGENDA ITEM #14(c) V-2 EACH DIS'I'RICT
that which existed before such transfer or change in organization.
For the purposes of this subsection, stockholders, bondholders,
partners, or other persons holding an ·interest in the business
entity are regarded as having the "real or ultimate ownership" of
such entity.
3. That of a parent in the earnings of his minor child for
personal services;
4. That of a landlord or tenant of a business entity contracting
with the District;
5. That of an attorney of a business entity contracting with
the District;
6. That of a supplier of goods or services to the District
when such goods or services have been supplied to the District by
such officer for at least five years prior to his election or
appointment to office;
7. That of a person subject to the provisions of Government
Code Section 1090 in any contract or agreement entered into pursuant
to the provisions of the California Land Conservation Act of 1965;
8. That of an officer, director, or employee of a bank, bank
holding company, or savings and loan association with which the
-District has the relationship of borrower or deposit~r, debtor or
creditor;
9. That of a shareholder of a corporation contracting with the
District if less than 3% of the shares of such corporation are owned
by such officer and total annual income to the officer from dividends,
including the value of stock dividends from the corporation, does
not exceed 5% of ttie officer's total annual income, and any other
payments mad~ to him by the corporation do not exceed 5% of his total
annual income.
B. An economic interest in substantial conflict with the
proper exercise of an official's duties within the meaning of
Section 3625(a) shall not be deemed to exist unless the_ official
would be required to disqualify himself under Section 3625(b) on a
continuous and regular basis from activities and actions which
AGENDA ITEM #14(c) V-3 EACH DISTRICT
constitute a major and significant portion of his official dutie3
and thereby impair his ability to function effectively arid fulfill
duties of his office.
SECTION 4. MATERIAL ECONOMIC EFFECT
An action or decision shall not be deemed to have a material
effect on an economic interest unless the official has reason to
believe that, by reason of the action or decision, an investment,
or interest in real property may increase or decrease in value,
other than negligibly, or a business entity from which the official
derives income or in which he holds a position of employment or
management will gain or lose monetarily, other than negligihly. A
change of less than 1% shall be deemed negligible.
SECTION 5. MINISTERIAL AND CLERICAL DUTIES
Section 3625(b) shall apply only to actions which involve
discretion or judgment. It does not apply to actions which are
solely ministerial or clerical.
SECTIO~ 6. PARTICIPATION
A. The t~rms "participate" and "attempt .to influence" as
used in Section 3625(b) shall be deemed to include but not be limited
to participation in deliberations or debate, or voting on the issue,
and the following actions when related to the merits.of the issue
to be decided on or acted upon:
1. Preparation of oral or written reports.
2. Rendition of oral or written advice.
3. Testimony before a public agency.
4. Discussion with any officials authorized to
decide or assist other public officials to
decide the matter.
5. Submission of letters or other documents to
any official authorized to decide or assist
other public officials to decide the matter.
6. Issuance or denial of an official approval.
AGENDA ITEM #14(c) V-4 EACH DISTRICT
B. Nothin~ contained herein or in Section 3625 shall abrid~e
the right of any citizen, whether or not a public official, .to
submit information or express views on the same basis as any other
private citizen, provided such is done in public and the ·person
indicates he is acting in a private capacity.
C. An official directly involved in a matter, .whether as a
party, or applicant, or otherwise may, in his private capacity,
provide whatever information is necessary and perform any other
steps which are required of other citizens in the same situation,
individually or by counsel. He may not, _however, discuss the matter
privately with officials who must decide the matter.
SECTION 7. NECESSITY
A. An official shall not be subjept to Section 3625(b) with
respect to any matter which cannot be legally acted upon or decided
without his participation.
B. Section 3625(b) shall not apply where:
1. A statutory quorum cannot be achieved by
continuance or within legally mandated time
limits;
2. More than a simple majority vote is required
to take a proposed action, and the number of
officials entitled to vote is less than the
number required; or
3. The official is, by law, the sole officer who
can perform the action or make the decision.
C. In cases where subsections (b) (1) or (b) (2) apply, all
otherwise qualified officials shall be entitled to participate.
D. In all cases involving exemptions hereunder, the officials
shall comply with Section 3625(d).
SECTION 8. DISQUALIFICATION
An official who refrains from acting in accordance with
Section 3625(b) should publicly announce such abstension but need
not declare the nature of the interest whic~ disqualifies such
official.
AGENDA ITEM #14(c) V-5 EACH DISTRICT
SECTION 9. INTERPRETATION
Any official who ts unsure of his duties under Section 3625
should secure a written opinion from counsel. When said opinion is
complied with in the good faith belief that it is consistent with
those provisions, said action shall be deemed in compliance with
these guidelines, and such official shall be exempt from the civil
penalties in Section 3751 and the sanctions in Section 3753.
SECTION 10. DISCLOSURE
Each of the public officials named in Section 2 above shall,
during the month of April in each year and within thirty (30) days
after ceasing to hold public office, file verified statements
containing the information described in Government Code Section 3700(b)
with the Clerk of the County of Orange. It is the intent of this
section to make the provisions of Chapter 4 of Division 4.5 of Title 1
of the Government Code applicable to the public officials of this
District.
SECTION 11. LIMITATIONS ON ACTIONS
No action shall be brought pursuant to Section 3751 of the
Government Code
A. To restrain the execution of or to set aside as
void any decision, contract, order, permit,
resolution or other official action unless-the
complaint or petition has been filed and served
on the Secretary of the District within thirty (30)
days following the decision, contract, order, permit,_
' resolution or other official action;
B. To enjoin an official from violating or to compel
an official to comply with the provision of
Division 4.5 of Title 1 of the Government Code or
of this resolution, unless the complaint or petition
has been filed and served within 180 days after the
violation of Section 3625 of the Government Code
occurred.
AGENDA ITEM #14(c) V-6 EACH DISTRICT
SECTION 12. SEVERABILITY
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of
this resolution is for any reason held by a court of competent
Jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the.
validity of the remaining portions of this resolution. The Board
of Directors hereby declares that it would have passed this resolution
and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof,
irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections,subsections,
sentences, clause or phrase be declared invalid.
SECTION 13, EFFECTIVE DATE
This resolution shall take effect upon its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 13, 1974.
AGENDA ITEM #14(c) V-7 EACH DISTRICT
~ t'A~~t.U tH lJl.~'l'li.lt.;'1':.::i ~, 0 & ( UNLY}
RESOLUTION NO. 74-53
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITA'J'ION DISTRICTS NOS. 5, 6, AND
7 OP o;\:LGS cuu:,i'IY J\CIJPTING GUIDELINES f'OR
THE H1PLEViErrrATION OF THE GOVERNME1~TAL
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST ACT
• * • * * * * * * *
BE IT RESOLVED by the Boards of Directors of the County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 5, 6, and 7 of Orange County, California:
SECTION 1. PURPOSE AND EFFECT
Pursuant to Section 3626 of the Government Code (all section
references herein are to the Government· Code unless otherwise
specified), the Boards of Directors of the County San~tation . .
Districts Nos. 5, 6, and 7 of Orange County, California hereby
adopt the following guidelines for their public officials in deter-
mining whether they have an economic interest or interests which
are in substantial conflict with their official duties and powers
under Subdivision (a) of Section 3625 and in determining whether
they have an economic interest in matters for purposes of
Subdivision (b) of Section 3625.
Nothing contained in this resolution is intended to modify or
abridge the provisions of the Governmental Conflicts of Interest Act
(Section 3600 et seq.), Sectionsl090-1097; or any other provisions
of law pertaining to conflicts of interest. This resolution shall
be interpreted in a manner consistent therewith. Nothing contained
herein shall be deemed adopted pursuant to or in implementation of
Section 3603 or Section 3704.
SECTION 2. DESIGNATION OF OFFICIALS
The "public officials," "officials," and "elective and
appointive officers" subject to the provisions· of Section 3625 are:
AGENDA ITEM #14(c) ·w-1 EACH DISTRICT
1. Board of Directors
2. General Manager
3. Chief Engineer
4. Secretary
5. County Auditor acting as ex officio Auditor of
the Districts
6. Director of Finance of the J.A.O.
7. General Counsel
SECTION 3. SUBSTANTIAL CONFLICT
A. An official shall not be deemded to have an economic
interest in substantial conflict with the proper exercise of an
official's duties within the meaning of Government Code Section
3625(a) if he has only a "remote economic interest" and if the fact
of such interest is disclosed to the body or Board of the District
and noted in its official records,. and the official in no way
attempts to influence any other public official of the District
with respect to any matter concerning such remote economic interest.
As used in this section, the term "remote economic interest"
means:
1. That of a non-salaried member or officer of a non-profit
corporation;
2. That of a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee or
holder of any position of management in any business entity contracting
with the District if such business entity has ten or more other
employees and if the officer was an employee or agent of said entity
for at least three years prior to his initially accepting his office.
For purposes of this subsection, time of employment with the business
entity by the officer shall be counted in computing such three-year
period even though such entity has been converted from one form of
business organization to a different form of business organization
within three years of the initial taking of office by such officer.
Time of employment in such case shall be counted only if, after the
transfer or change in orcnnization, the real. or ultimate ownership
for the contracting party is t~e same or substantially similar to
AGENDA ITEM #14(c) W-2 EACH DISTRICT
that which existed before such transfer or chanGe in organization.
For the purposes of this. subsection, stockholders, bondholders,
partners, or other persons holding an ~nterest in the business
entity are regarded as having the "real or ultimate ownership" of
such entity.
3. That of a parent in the earnings of his minor child for
personal services;
4. That of a landlord or tenant of a business ·entity contracting .
with the District;
5. That of an attorney of a business entity contracting with
the District;
6. That of a supplier of goods or services to the District
when.such goods or services have been supplied to the District by
such officer for at least five years prior to his election or
appointment to office;
1. That of a person subject to the provisions of Government
Code Section 1090 in any contract or agreement.entered into pursuant
to the provisions of the California Land Conservation Act of 1965;
8. That of an officer, director, or employee of a bank, bank
holding company, or savings and loan association with which the
District has the relationship of borrower or depositor, debtor or
creditor;
9. That of a shareholder of a corporation contracting with the
District if less than 3% of the shares of such corporation are owned
by such officer and total annual income to the officer from dividends,
including the value of stock dividends from the corporation, does
not exceed 5% of the officer's total annual income, and any other
payments made to him by the corporation do not exceed 5% of his total
annual income.
B. An economic interest in substantial conflict with the
proper exercise of an official's duties within the meaning of
Section 3625(a) shall not be deemed to exist unless the official
would be required to disqualify himself under Section 3625(b) on a
continuous and regular basis from activities and actions which
AGENDA ITEM #14(c) W-3 EACH DISTRICT
constitute a major and significant portion of his official duties
and thereby impair his ability to function effectively and fulfill
duties of his office.
SECTION 4. MATERIAL ECONOMIC EFFECT
An action or decision shall not be deemed to have a material
effect on an economic interest· un~ess the official has reason to
believe that, by reason of the action or decision, an investment,
or interest in real property may increase or decrease in value,
other than negligibly, or a business entity from which the official
derives income or in which he holds a position of employment or
management will gain or lose monetarily,· other than negligibly. A
change of less than 1% shall be deemed negligible.
SECTION 5. MINISTERIAL AND CLERICAL DUTIES
Section 3625(b) shall apply only to actions which involve
discretion or judgment. It does not apply to actions which are
solely ministerial or clerical.
SECTION 6. PARTICIPATION
A. The terms "participate" and "attempt to influence" as
used in Section 3625(b) shall be deemed to include but not be limited
to participation in deliberations or debate, or voting on the issue,
and the following actions when related to the merits of the issue
to be decided on or acted upon:
1. Preparation of oral or written reports.
2. Rendition of oral or written advice.
3. Testimony befo1·e a public agency.
4. Discussion with any officials authorized to
decide or assist other public officials to
decide the matter.
5. Submission of letters or other documents-to
any official authorized to ·aecide or.assist
other public officials to decide the matter.
6. Issuance or denial of an official approval.
AGENDA ITEM #14(c) W-4 EACH DISTRICT
B. Nothine contained herein or in Section 3625 shall abriclLe
the right of any citizen, whether or not a public official, to
submit information or express views on the same basis as any other
private citizen, provided such is done in public and the person
indicates he is acting in a private capacity.
C. An official directly involved in a matter, .whether as a
party, or applicant, or otherwise may, in his private capacity,
provide whatever information is necessary and perform any other
steps which are required of other citiz~ns in the same situation,
individually or by counsel. He may not, however, discuss the matter
privately with officials who must decide the matter.
SECTION 7. NECESSITY
A. An official shall not be subject to Section 3625(b) with
respect to any matter which cannot be legally acted upon or decided
without his participation.
B. Section 3625(b) shall not apply where:
1. A statutory quorum cannot be achieved by
continuance or within legally mandated time
limits;
2. More than a simple majority vote is required
to take a proposed action, and the number of
officials entitled to vote is less than the
number required; or
3. The official is, by law, the sole officer who
can perform the action or make the decision.
C. In cases where subsections (b) (1) or (b) (2) apply, all
otherwise qualified officials shall be entitled to participate.
D. In all cases involving exemptions hereunder, the officials
shall comply with Section 3625(d).
SECTION 8. DISQUALIFICATION
An official who refrains from acting in accordance with
Section 3625(b) should publicly announce such abstension but need
not declare the nature of the interest which disqualifies such
official.
AGENDA ITEM #14(c) W-5 EACH DisrrRICT
SECTION 9. . INTERPRETJ\'I1ION
Any official who is unsure of his duties under Section 3625
should secure a written opinion from counsel. When said opinion i3
complied with in the good faith belief that it is consistent with
those provision~, said action shall be deemed in compliance with
these guidelines, and such official shall be exempt from the civil
penalties ih Section 3751 and the sanctions in Section 3753.
SECTION 10. LIMITATIONS ON ACTIONS
No action shall be brought pursuant to Section 3751 of the
Government Code
A. To restrain the execution of or to set aside as
void any decision, contract, order, permit,
resolution or other official action unless the
complaint or petition has been filed and served
on.the Secretary of the District within thirty (30)
days following the decision, contract, order, permit,
resolution or other official action;
B. To enjoin an official from violating or to compel
an official to co~ply with the provision of
Division 4.5 .of Title 1 of the Government Code or
of this resolution, unless the complaint or petition
has be~n filed and served within 180 days after the
violation of Section 3625 of the Government·code
occurred.
SECTION 11. SEVERABILITY
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of
this resolution is for any reason held by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this resolution. The Board of
Directors hereby declares that it would have passed this resolution
and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof,
irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections,
sentences, clause or phrase be declared invalid.
SECTION 12. EFFECTIVE DATE
This resolution shall take effect upon its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOP'I1ED at a rq;ulnr meet inc; held March 13, 1974.
AGENDJ\ ITEM #14(c) W-6 EACH DISTRICT
BDLJ/e EnaineerinCJ Corporation
.: 1.7 ...... '';_•: ·: l ~ lJ.'t ...... ,,,
p 0 £ ... 1 :-
r .. '.. . ·-. ·---. -----.
Board of Di rectors
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY
Attention Mr. Fred A. Harper, General /.Aanager
Post Office Box 1728
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer
Reaches 10, 11, and Portion of Reach 12
71.: 5.: 7 . .:.: .•
July 3, 1974
Pursuant to Nv-.• Harper's request 1 we are pleased to· submit our proposal for furnishing pro-
fessional engineering services for the preparation of final plans and specifications for subject
project as set forth in the preliminary engineering report dated February 1974.
The Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer is part of the original master plan of trunk sewer facilities
adopted in June of 1969. It will serve the central portion of the district north of the Santa
Ana Freeway. Running northerly from the recently completed Red Hi 11 and Sunflower Inter-
ceptor system, the new trunk will relieve the district's existing North Trunk and subtrunks
which presently serve this area and are currently flowing at or near peak capacity. Reach
10 begins at the intersection of Red Hill and Mitchell Avenues in the city of Tustin, runs
westerly in Mitchel I Avenue to Newport Avenue, northerly in Newport to Irvine Boulevard,
with Reach 11 continuing in the Southern Pacific Transportation Company's abandoned right-
of-way to Seventeenth Street. This portion of Reach 12 extends northerly in Esplanade Street
from Seventeenth Street to Fairhaven Avenue where the project tenninates. Total length of
the project is approximately 3-1/2 miles.
The total estimated cost, including construction, engineering, design surveying, construc-
tion staking, construction inspection, in-plant inspection, lega I, administration, easement
acquisition, and incidental costs, is $1,214,000. The preliminary engineering report for
this facility has been reviewed by the cities of Tustin and Orange and the County of Orange.
It is proposed that construction of the project be accomplished under two contracts ---Reach
10 being one contract and Reach 11 and portion of Reach 12 the second contract.
We will provide the following professional engineering services for the final plans and speci-
fications and construction phases of the proposed project, based on two individual contracts
as outlined above.
AGENDA ITEM #38 X-1 DISTRICT 7
County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County -2-July 3, 1974
1. Niake arrangements for and coordinate field surveys, gather benchmark data, existing
surveys, etc. If pavement coring is required for final design, make arrangements for
outside services. ·
2. Research underground utilities records. Includes both field and office contacts with
public and municipal utility companies.
3. As required to avoid conflicts between proposed project work and existing utilities,
make arrangements for exploratory holes to expose existing utilities for position and
elevation. Obtain excavation permits. Solicit proposals from contractors if district
forces ore not available for exploratory work. Contact city and county inspection
deportments. /.iiark and survey exposed utilities.
4. Prepare engineering data for regulatory permit applications that may be required by
the city of Tustin, Orange County Road Department, Southern Pac.ific Transportation
Company, the Orange County Flood Control District, and the State Division of
Highways.
5. Prepare detailed plans and specifications.
6. Review preliminary and final plans and specifications with the city of Tustin, Orange
County Road Department, Harbors, Beaches and Parks District, and the State Division
of Highways. Receive traffic control, detour, and pavement replacement requirements.
7. Process final plans and specifications through State Division of Highways.
8. Process final plans and specifications through Southern Pacific Transportation Company.
9. Process final plans through utility companies.
10. Process storm channel undercrossings through Orange County Flood Control District.
11. Prepare estimates of quantities and costs.
12. Deliver original tracings of plans and reproducible plates of the specifications for the
district's use in preparing the necessary number of copies for record purposes and dis-
tribution to prospective bidders, etc.
AGENDA ITEM #38 X-2 DISTRICT 7
County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County -3-July 3, 1974
13. Prepare legal descriptions and plats for right-of-way acquisitions as required for
facility location and construction.
14. Assist the district in securing bids, in the tabulation and analysis of bid results,
and in letting of the contract.
15. Attend pre-award conferences with contractor, district staff, ciiy of Tustin,
Orange County Road Department, and the State Division of Highways.
16. Check shop and working drawings as may be submitted by the contractor.
17. Review laboratory reports on material tests and inspection and correlate such
reports with the intention of the plans and specifications.
18. Furnish consultation and advice to the district or its agent during construction.
19. Observe initial operation of the project, witnessing performance tests as required
by the specifications, and reporting same to the district.
20. Make a final inspection and report of the completed project with a representative
of the district or its agent.
21. Prepare record drawings when construction work has been completed and accepted
by the district. This shall mean the original tracings of the plans will be modi-
fied if necessary because of deviations from the original work. Since the district
will carry out inspection of the project, modifications to the original tracings
will be based upon information supplied to the engineer by the district. The
original tracings, after modification, will become district property.
Our total fee for the proposed project, including the preliminary engineering phase and
the design and construction phases, is $63, 855. In accordance with our agreement for ·
preliminary engineering study fees, we will credit $6,008 toward the total fee, leaving
a remaining fee of $57,847. For district accounting purposes, we suggest the fee be
divided as follows: $35,287 for Reach 10, and $22,560 for Reach 11 and a portion of
Reach 12. It is also suggested that payment be monthly on a percentage-complete basis
up to 90 percent at time of delivery of plans and specifications, with 100 percent pay-
ment when the work is completed and accepted by the district. Field surveys will be
required in order to prepare the plans and specifications. These surveys will include
taking topography and culture within the project limits. We propose that all field
AGENDA ITEM #38 X-3 DISTRICT 7
~·
County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County -4-July 3, 1974
surveys necessary for design be performed on a per diem basis at the following hourly
rates: (1) three-man survey party -$60/hour, (2) two-man survey party -$48/hour,
and (3) licensed surveyor -$22/hour. Payment is to be monthly as invoiced. If con-
struction staking is requested, these rates will remain in effect until June 30, 1975,
at which time they would be subject to revision.
We propose that all outside services required and approved by the district, such as
pavement coring, plant inspection for quality control, and materials used on the proj-
ect construction, be paid directly by the district upon presentation of a statement for
such outside services with the engineer's certification.
lfwe are authorized to proceed with this work at the July 10~ 1974, board meeting,
we can have· plans and specifications ready for advedising bids in December 1974 on
Reach 10 and in February 1975 on Reach 11 and portion of Reach 12.
BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION
Omo~_)(/_ 1r
Conrad Ho hen er, Jr. , PE
Principal Civil Engineer
B-C07-123-50
AGENDA ITEM #38 X-4 DISTRICT 7
COUNTY SANITATION DI~TRICT NO._JL
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
FUND
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE
)!rectors Fees
~ontractual Services -Share
of Joint Operating
Professional Services
~rinting & Publication
rrave 1 & Meeting -Directors'
Mileage
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
~ess: Cash Carry-Over & Revenue
='unds Available July l
Budgeted Requirements 73/74
Actual Expenditures 73/74
Allowance for Accruals,
Other Income & Transfers
~ash Carry-Over
[nterest & Misc. Receipts
TOTAL CASH & REVENUE
\MOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
AGENDA.
----~-~--·-
ITEM #42 &
1974/75 FISCAL YEAR
19 7 4 / 7 5 EST I MATED ASSESSED VAL UA Tl 0 N $ 1 !~ 3 , 3 6 5 , 2 2 7
1974/75 EST. A. V. ADJUSTED FOR '..>~ DEL I NQ. $ 13(', 1)6,966
1974/75 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A. V. $Ho T:n Rat P
ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $1{o T:::x R:.ite
APPROVED APPROVED EST I MATED RECOMMENDED
BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL BU.OGF ...
EXPENDIT~RES ~
1q7217~ 1q7~174 1973/7 1974/75
600 600 200 600
600 600 600 600
1,600 1,100 465
500 350 350
100 100 . 26 100
826·
3,400 2,750 2,115
~
2,750
826
1,924
67
3,282 2,627 1,991 1,991
118 123 124
------
3,400 2,750 2,115
-0--0--0-
··-
"""
.
-Y-DISTRICT t-
RESOLUTION NO. 74-96-11
ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT
(ANNEXATION NO. 17 -BOLSA CHICA STATE BEACH
ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11)
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO
THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 17 -BOLSA CHICA
STATE BEACH ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT NO. 11)
* * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to County
Sanitation District No. 11 for annexation of territory to the District
by means of a petition filed by the property owner; and,
Section 2. That pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization
Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California,
application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation
Commissicn for annexation of said territory to County Sanitation
District No. 11 by means of Resolution No. 74-42-11, filed with said
Commission by the District; and,
Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission to
the territory proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 17 -Bolsa
Chica State Beach Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 11",
the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit '!A" and
shown on Exhibit "B" ·attached hereto and by reference made a part of
this resolution; and,
Section 4. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is
uninhabited; and,
Section 5. That the reason for annexing said territory is to
obtain and provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and,
Section 6. That annexation of said territory is subject to
payment of annexation fees in the amount of $990.00; and,
AGENDA ITEM #45 Z-1 DISTRICT 11
Section 7. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local
Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District
Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code,
Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described
hereinabove, be and it is hereby ordered annexed to Qounty Sanitation
District No. 11 without notice or hearing and without election,
subject to the provision of Section 6.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1974.
AGENDA ITEM #45 Z-2 DISTRICT 11
RESOLUTION NO. 74-97-11
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH
STATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
FOR DISPOSAL OF SEWAGE ORIGINATING WITHIN
BOLSA CHICA STATE BEACH
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF AGREEMENT WITH STATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS
AND RECREATION FOR DISPOSAL OF SEWAGE
ORIGINATING WITHIN THE BOLSA CHICA STATE
BEACH AND PROVIDING FOR PAYMENT THEREOF
* * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11
of Orange County, California,
DOES ~EREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain agreement, dated
between County Sanitation District No. 11 and the ·State of California,
acting through the Department of Parks and Recreation, for disposal of
sewage originating within the Bolsa Chica State Beach, and providing
for payment of capacity rights and annual maintenance and operating
costs, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District
are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement, in form
approved by the General Counsel, on behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1974.
AGENDA ITEM #46 -AA-DISTRICT 11
TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,8 & 11
DISTRICT 1
1/ (GARTHE) ••••• PATTERSON •••• ·-.-----
(CLARK) •••••• BATTIN ••••• ···-~.-. ----
RI MA ••••••• ··._ ... _ --
(LANGLEY) •••• SALTARELLI.···-··-----
DISTRICT 2
' D' '''NEl •••••• w INN • • • • • • • • • ------L....,,NS ••••• ·CALLAHAN • • • • • -' -----
EWING •••• ··CHAPUT·······-· -----
BAKER ······CLARK········_, -----
PATTERSON)· ~GARTHE • • • • •• ·-··-----
NEVIL-) •• ····GRAHAM······· ------
THO(vl) • • • • • • ·KAYWOOD • • • • • • -· .-----
FOX) • • • • • • • ·MAC KAIN· • • • • • ~ ----
PERRY • • • • • • • • -j-----~STANTON) ····SCOTT········-·-.-----
PERE ) ······TEMPLE·······-~ --·---
ROOTY ••••••.• wooD ••••••••• -~· _ ----
DISTRICT 3 '\ ... ,
!MAC KAIN.) ••• -Fe*;-••••••••• -·-· --
NUIJENS) ····ARB ISO.······-~ .. -----
CLARK)····· ·BATTIN···· • • • -~-----
COLLI NS)··· ·BYRNE········-"-----
CULVER.······ _v_ ----
(MEYER)······ DAVIS· • • • • • • • _/_ ----ii EDWARDS······ ------
PATTERSON) • • GARTHE • • • • • • • _,,,_.· ----
THO(vl) • • • • • • • KAYWOOD· • • • • • -···-----
COX) • • • • • • • ·LONG· • • • • • • • • ~ ----
B LACK(v1AN) ···Me KNEW • • • • • • -J-.· ----
y 'NG)······ NEVIL········-"-__ --~D) •••••• ·ROOT· • • • • • • • • _../ ____ _
~LACAYO)···· ·SONJU· • • • • • • • ~ __ --
SCOTT)····· ·SVALSTAD· • • • • _. ____ _
COEN)······· WI EDER·······_/ ____ _
DISTRICT 5
(RYCKOFFL ••• MC INNIS ••••• _I_ ----
(BAKER) •••••• CLARK •••••••• -.;'-----
ROGERS ••••.•• _,,_ ----
DISTRICT 6
PORTER ••••••• ------
(CLARK) •••••• BATTIN....... ----
(MC INNIS) ••• STORE •••••••• ------
DISTRICT 7
(LANGL~Y)· ···SALTARELLI··· ----
(PRYOR •••••• BURTON.... • • • ----
(BAKER •• ) ••• CLARK........ ----
(MC INNIS.•·· DOSTAL·······, __ ----
(PEREZ) •••••• JACKMAN...... . ----
(GARTHE) ••••• PATTERSON.... · ----
PORTER. • • • • • • ----
DI~RICT 11
~COEN) ••••• • • DUKE. • • • • • • • • "' ----
CLARl<) ••• • •• BAKER •••••• • • ------
COEN) ••••••• GIBBS •.•••••• --------
DISTRICT 8
./ MITCHELL.. •• •• ----
(BAKER) •• •••• CLARK········~ ----
(JOHNSON) ••• • HOLM • • • • • • • • _l• ----
7/10/74
JOINT BOARDS
· PORTER· • • • • • _:.·_ --
NU I JENS) ARBISO· • • • • ._v __ _
CLARK~· • • • • • ·BAKER~ • • • • • • -~.---
CLARK •······BATTIN······-·---
PRYOR ·······BURTON······_'. __ _
COLLI!S) ·····BYRNE······._ .. __ _
L VONS • • • • • • ·CALLAHAN· • • • ~. -. __
EWING • • • • • • ·CHAPUT· • • • • • -"·-' __
BAKER • • • • • • ·CLARK······._ ..... · __ . _
CULVER······ ·1 ~MEYER)·······DAVIS····~··--:--===
MC IN.NI s). · · · ·DOSTAL· • •' • • • _·. __ _
COEN)· • • • • • • ·DUKE· • • • • • • ·-·· _. __
EDWARDS····· ·
MAC KAIN).··· ·f~· • • • • • • .-... ---
PATTERSON).·.· GARTHE· • • • • ·---:--===
NEVI[_).····· ·GRAHAM······ .. ·
COEN)······· ·GIBBS······· ·
PEREZ)······ ·JACKMAN····.-.. ---
THOr) • ·······KAYWOOD····.-.. ---
(COX ·········LONG········~===
! F 0 X • • • • • • • • • MAC KA I N • • • • ··
RYCKOFF) • • • • ·MC INNIS • • • .-.. ---
BLACKMAN)··· ·MG-KNEW-.····.-"---
-YO. UNG) • • • • • • ·NEVIL· • • • • • ·-L---
: GARTHE) ······PATTERSON··.-.,---
. PERRY· • • • • • .-~---
RI MA·······.-,---
ROGERS· • • • • .-_, ---
(WOOD) • • • • • • • ·ROOT· • • • • • • .-.---
(LANGLEY)····· SALTARELLI·· / ===
STANTON) • • • • ·SCOTT· • • • • • •
LACAYO)······ SONJU • • • • • • ·-r --
MC I N31 S ). • • • ·STORE· • • • • • • 11. ===
SCOTT ·······SVALSTAD···· v
PEREl • • • • • • ·TEMPLE· • • • • ·-.;---
COEN)······· ·WI EDER·····.-/---
) ~--DUNNE •••••••WINN••••••• •_v __ _
ROOT) • • • • • • • ·WOOD· • • • • • • • _/_ --
* * * * * * * * *
OTHERS
J
HARPER
SYLVESTER v
LEWIS
·~·
CLARKE I/
TAYLOR :,./
BROWN ---:;;:;-
NISSON --:T
EWING ..,/
HOHENER ... --HOWARD
HUNT I,,./
KEITH __.J!_
KENNEY -"-LYNCH ·_,,./
MADDOX v --MARTINSON ...... --PIERSALL
STEVENS ... --
7/10/74 JOINT MEETING
(6) Election of Joint Chairman
Mcinnis and Saltarelli appointed to canvassing committee. Voted
by District.
asked
Baker/whether· it was legal ror some representatives on more than one
District to vote more than once. Nisson answered that was the way
it has always been and yes, it is legal.
Winn elected Joint Chairman
(7) Election of Vice Joint Chairman
Director Wood asked that the candidates say a few words about themselves
since there was ·nothing in the agenda on them. Duke said that he
believed that the Vice Chairman should be a strong support for the
Joint Chairman and be able to take over in his absence and to assist
him. Director Graham spoke for Norma Gibbs. Said she had been on our
Board as a representative from Seal Beach from 1960-63 and again
in 1970 when elected '..;te Huntington Beach City Council. Was recently
honored when she received Professor-of-the-Year award at Cal State,
Long Beach.
Voted by District. Norma Gibbs elected.
(9) Report of the Joint Chairman
Called a meeting of the Executive Committee for July 30th at 5:30 p.m.
and invited Directors Kaywood and Graham to .attend. Kaywo od said she
had a City council meeting that day so didn't know if it wo uld be over
in time to attend.
10) Report of General Manager
invited
Mr. Harper xai~xxkax the Chairman and Vice Chairman t o a noon meeting
on July 30th to meet with the State Water Resources Control Board.
~entioned that Russell Train was at Mayors ~ Conference in San Diego
and he is very much aware of secondary treatment. Read a portion of
a newspaper article from San Diego giving Mr. Train's comments regarding
secondary treatment. Said another interesting article was sent to
him from a newspaper in Bangar, Maine. This is where Senator Muskie,
the author of the Water Pollution Control Bill, is fr om. Th ey are
also asking Muskie to change the bill. Said the main reason for the
SWRCB' s ·· coming here was to look at the JPL process and discuss the
secondary treatment problem and try to get the±r support in Washington.
FAH then reported that CASA is having their annual conference in San
Diego on August 22nd & 23rd. Said any Directors that wish to attend
were certainly welcome, and he would send out registration material
and information. Advised that they hoped to have representatives
from EPA in San Francisco and also some State people there.
) Report of the General Counsel
Nisson said that not much had happened since the last meeting two
weeks ago. Said that there was one item -that had been on the back
burner for a couple months. Advised that under our connection
ordinance regarding permit fees, we have a provision that if they
don't pay, there is a delinquency charge as provided by the statute.
10% added to the bill plus 1/2% per month. Have approximately 10-20
delinquencies. Range from $5 to $500 . Will bundle them all up and
go into small claims court . Many customers that are delinquent will
pay original bill but will not pay penalty. Losing proposition.
but ordinance doesn't give us any leeway. ·
(12b)
(14b)
(14c)
p. 2
or Temple
Director Jackman/moved to removed item 12(b) from the Consent Calendar.
Balance of Consent Calendar moved & seconded .
Questioned the reason for the change order which indicated it was to
bring the warehousing into conformance with the building codes and
fire codes of the City of Fountain Valley. Questioned this sizable
a change. Asked if this shouldn't be picked up by architect. Also
asked if there had been any recent changes in building code.
Ray Lewis advised that this was part of the 1971-72 grant program.
Were seven projects under that particular grant. Let the various
contracts at various times. We were in conformity with 1969 Uniform
Fire & Building Codes. Said we got hit with new UBC and OSHA require-
ments between the time we went out to contract and the bid.
Mentioned some of the new requirments which we have now complied with.
Director then restated his question that there have been changes in
the building code and was answered, yes. Moved item 12(b), seconded
and carried.
Svalstad commented that normally ·you don't go out to bid until you
get plans and specs approved. Asked what period of time there was
between bidding and actually starting construction? REL answered
between 6-8 months .
Saltarelli stated that there was a 242 calendar day extension of time
and asked if that was reason for this $20,000. REL answered, no it
was not.
Conflicts of Interest
Nisson advised that he wrote a rather lengthy memo on this which
was in the agenda package. Said his conclusion or recommendation
would be that since they have very little exposure in the four months
left of this Act, would be better not adopting guidelines at this
time. Or if they do decide to adopt guidelines, recommended they d o
not adopt disclosure portion.
Patterson said he understood that Proposition 9 repeals this. Asked
if this applies to us. Nissan said yes, effective January 9, 1975.
Guidelines cannot be approved by Board of Supervisors or other
agencies until January 1, 1976.
Moved Nisson's recommendation to take no action. Seconded and carried
for all Districts.
(15) JPL Process
Reported that three months ago Board authorized us to proceed with
experimental work and the funds have now been expended forihe work
done so far. We had the Chief of the SWRCB grant team d own here and
he was impressed with the project and asked us to submit to the State
a preliminary report for them to consider. Were going to get a
college professor to look at report and figured within 30 days fr om
time we got report in, we would get an answer on project for 1 MGD
facility. We may not receive the full amount asked for ($3.5 million)
but does appear from woF.k done so far that this is going t o be a
worthwhile program. Are two actions qn agenda--One to authorize
expenditure of another $10,000~ $7500 of which would be staff time
and $2500 Board consulting work with JPL people. Other item is a
commitment of an expenditure of $100,000 .to finish up work we wo u ld
need to do on trailer model to get information to design 1 MGD
facility. That would be only on the .basis that we receive the
go ahead from State people. Will rave people here on the 30th. Questi on
was asked if we shouldn't wait until after that meeting to see what
kind of a reaction we get. Mr. Harper said that he thought what
we were attempting to do was to demonstrate to EPA and State that
we were willing to go ahead with program that they would not fund
to prove it is an important program. This .is a declaration of intent.
Was asked what amount was estimated. FAH advised NASA and JPL said
they would match whatever the Districts would come up with. Said
our staff and JPL people got together and figured it wouldn't run
over $200,000. JPL has spent some $260,000 on this project so far.
Moved items 15(b) & (c).
. '
(18)
(24)
(37a)
Called Executive Session to consider personnel matter.
8:40 -8:56 p.m.
DIST. 2 Other business
p. j
Nisson stated that he needed a motion authorizing payment on a
judgment for a piece of right of way we went to trial on last month.
$12,248.83 and includes $801.33 worth of interest, so we can cut
off interest. It was then moved to authorize payment and have
Nisson sign warrant.
Tustin-Orange EIR
Jackman stated that this was before them before and at that time had
stated that it was preliminary and would go into detail later. Wondered
if they weren't going to do that now. He was advised that it was
explained in detail at last month's meeting but he was absent then.
Said he had a question regarding Handy Creek. REL stated that they
were presently trying to coordinate our activities with Flood Control.
This project is a small sewer 18-21". Not a real deep sewer. Said
construction in the area would be relatively short. Long-term effects
would not be visible. Will be coordinated with whatever Flood Control
comes up with as part of cooperative planning study by the County.