Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-07-10July 3, 1974 NOTICE TO DISTRICT NO. 3 DIRECTORS SUBJECT: Agenda Item No. 26 Regular Meeting of July 10, 1974 COUNTY SANITAl J DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P. 0 . BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FO U N TAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92 708 (714) 540-2910 (714 ) 962-2411 Because of the size of the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 through 8, regarding subject agenda item, it is being mailed herewith under separate cover. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) July 3, 1974 TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, AND 11 Gentlemen: The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held: WEDNESDAY EVEN I NG,~ ·JULY· 10; "1974 AT 7:30 P.M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA sf)retary Tentative adjournment prior to next regular meeting: Executive Committee -July 30, 1974, 5:30 p.m. SPECIAL NOTICE TO THE DIRECTORS: As previously reported, the contractor for the 50 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facility at Plant 1 will host a 6:30 p.m. DINNER for the Directors immediately preceding the July 10th Joint Board meeting, for the purpose of describing the firm's construction schedule and the methods they will em- ploy in constructing the project. Dinner will be served in the second floor section of the Districts' Administration Building. We are inviting all Directors to be present at a ground- breaking/picture-taking session for the news media scheduled for 6:00 p.m. at the construction site, which can be reached through the Plant No. 1 main entrance. The contractor has advised that he will have some large, earth-moving equipment in operation at that time. .... ~.. -... MANAGER'·S AGENDA REPORT · County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS . REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, July.10 , 1974 7:30 p.m. Post Office Box. B 127 10844 Ell i s Avenue Fountain Volley , Calif., 92708 Telephones: Areo Code 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 GARFIELD ENTRANCE TO PLANT NO. 1 CLOSED. With the beginning of the construction of the new treatment facilities, the Plant 1 rear entrance by way of Garfield has been closed. The following is a brief explanation of the mo re imp or tant, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are not attached to the· agenda since they are made up immediatel y preceding the meeting, but will appear in the supplemental agenda available at the meeting. There was no meeting of the . Executive Committee dur.ing t he month of June. Joint Boards Nos. 6 and 7 -Electi on of Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. Nominations for the positions of Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman were made at the regular June meeting. These two office rs will be elected and seated on July 10th. The nominees for Joint Chairman are: Directors George Scott and Donald Winn . The nominees .for Vice Joint Chairman are: Directors Henry Duke and Norma Gibbs . No. 12 -Consent Calendar. The following agenda items fall into this category in accordance with the definition established by the Boards: No. 12-a -Approvin Plans and S ecifications for Job No . J~6-l (Additional Pumping Fa cilities a t Oc ean Outfall Pum ping Stat i on . John Carollo Engineers has completed t h e plans a n d specifications for the installation of twollOO hp sludge gas -dr iven p u mp ing un its t o be added to the Foster Outfall Booster Station. These pumps wil l be capable of pumping 70 mgd each . The engineer's estimate is $1 ,3 90,000. No. 12-b -Change Order No .. 2, Job No. J-13. The change order appearing in the agenda authorizes the addition of $20,520.54 to the contract with J. Ray Construction Compa ny f or Shops and Warehouse Buildin g at Plant No . 1. This c hange order was occasioned by the need to modify the plans t o meet t he specific requirements of the City's Building and Fire Codes, and to provide additional security to the warehouse storage area. The additional con struct ion costs will qualify for 83% State and Federal grant participation. No. 12-c -In-Process Pipe Inspection Services for 1974-75 Fiscal Year. The staff is recommending the acceptance ·of the proposal of Testing Engineers, Inc., for in-pr6cess pipe testing for the coming fiscal year. Included in the agenda material is a Memorandum from the Districts' Chief Engineer, describing the manner in which the selection of the testing firm was made. No. 12-d -Change Order No. 1, Job No. Pl-16 (Activated Sludge Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1). This change order incorporates the current Federal minimum wage rates into the contract with Donovan Construction Company of Minnesota, as required by the State and Federal grant provisions. This is a no-cost change order. No. 12-e -Amending the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Qua lity Act of 1970. Resolution No. 74-91, which appears in the agenda mat erial, amends the Districts' Environmental Guidelines to conform with recent changes in State regulations. Approval 'of the resolution is recommended by the Genera l Counsel. No. 12-f -Stop Notice Against Mel Gorham Construction Company. The action appearing in the agenda acknowledges .receipt of a Stop Notice submitted by Fischer and Porter Company against the Districts' contractor for the Power Reliability Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2 -20. No. 12-g -Change Order No. 3, Job No. P2-21. This change order to the plans and specifications for Digesters "N" and "O" at Plant No. 2 authorizes additional work totaling $860.36, and grants an extension of time of 117 calendar days as described in the change order. The staff recommends approval. No. 12-h -Authorization for Incre ase in Salary for Assistant En g in eer . One of our Engineering Department staff members, Don Bogart, has r e c ent ly r e c eived notification that ·he has . successfully passed the State examination for r eg istration in Mechanical Engineer ing . As a recognition of this accomp li shment , we are recommending that Mr. Bogart be granted a one -half step increase in salary . Similar actions hav e b een take n by the Boards in the past. -2 - No. 12-i -Claim Against the Districts. A claim against the Districts has been filed for .alleged injuries received in an accident. The action appearing on the agenda, which includes authorizing filing a late claim and deny- ing said claim, is recommended by the General Co unsel. District No . 2 No. 12-k -Authorizing Advertising for Bids for the Con - _struction of the Yorba Linda Pump Station. The District's engineers, Lowry and Associqtes, have completed the plans and specifications for the Yorba Linda P~mp Station to be constructed on State College property at the intersection of Associated Road and Yorba Linda Boulevard in.the City .of Fullerton. The engineer's estimate is $532,000, ·and the ,contractor will need one year to construct the facility. We recommend that bids for this project be received on September 4th. No. 12-1 & m -Closeout of -Contract No . 2-14-1 -Santa Ana River Interceptor .from Plant No . 1 to Katella Avenue. Change Order No. 14 authorizes a deduction of $14,970, to reflect the final adjustment of engineer's quantitiea, while Change Order No. 15 grants an 18 -day extension of time due to inclement weather. The final contract price is $7,819,756.72. It is the staff's recommendation that the Board adopt Resolution No. 74-93-2, accepting the job as complete and authorizing recordation of a Notice of Completion. No. 12-n -Change Order No. 1, Contract No. 2 -14 -2, Santa Ana River Interceptor from Kate lla Avenue to La Palma Avenue. This change order authorizes the contractor to use an alternate construction method rather than jacking variou s diameters of casings in areas designated on the plans. The staff recommends approval of the change order at no additional cost or construction time allowance. District No. 3 No. 12-p -Chan g e Order No. 3, Contract No . 3-1 8, Knott Interceptor, Contract No . 3-18, Reach 4. This change order authorizes an extension of contract time totaling 39 cal8ndar days for loss of time due to a strike of the pipe suppliers' truck drivers. -3- No. 12-q -Agreement with the City of Stanton. The City of Stanton has requested that the District incorporate construction of a storm drain and street improvements (estimated costs, $236,000) into the contract for the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 and 6, Contract No. 3-20-1 (estimated cost, $4,026,000) which is currently under design. The agreement provides for reimbursement to the District for the costs of the additional work. It is the staff's recommendation that the agreement be approved in form acceptable to the General Counsel. District No. 5 No. 12-s -Change Order No. 1 to Contract No. 5-14R-3 (Manhole Replacement and Repair). It is recommended that this change order, waiving the District's standard fire insurance requirements, be approved. This require- ment was inadvertently included in the specifications for this manhole repair contract. District No. 11 No. 12-t -Claims by General Telephone Company . The District has received three claims from the General Telephone Company in connection with construction of the Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension, Contract No. 11-12. The General Counsel recommends the action appearing on the agenda denying the claims. The District's staff has forwarded the claims to the · .contractor for disposition. No. 12-u & v -Closeout of Contract No. 11-12. Construction of the Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension is complete and the staff recommends approval of Change Order No . 3 which is a final adjustment of engineer's quantities, adding $5,015 to the original contract price. Previous authorized changes total $5,666.88, making the final contract pr ic e $429,682.38. Con- sent Item (v) declares the contract complete and authorizes recorda- tion of a Notice of Completion, as well as approving a Final Closeout Agreement with the contractor. All Districts No. 14 -Conflict of Interest Guidelines. Pursuant to the Board's instructions on June 26, included in the agenda material are two versions of the Districts' guideline resolutions, as well as a Memorandum from the General Counsel , for the Directors' consideration. Resolution No . ·74 -52 includes the Disclosure Provision (see Page V-6, agenda supporting documents). ' -4- • No. 15 -Status Report on JPL Process. As previously reported, t he staff has filed a Step I g rant application with the State Water Resources Control Board to con- struct a one-mgd activated carbon pyrolysis process unit which will operate in a continuous mode to develop future construction design criteria and cost -effective information concerning this new process. Two actions appear on the agenda for Board considerat i on. One , that authorization be approved in an .amount not to exceed $1 0 ,000 ($7 ,500 will be for staff time and $2,500 will be required for consultation with personnel from JPL), to continue operating the trailer-mounted pilot unit through the month of August at which t i me we expect approval of the Step I grant application. The other action is a commitment from the Boards declaring intent to match funds with JPL and NASA in an amount not to exceed $100,000 for additiona l process development work which would be performed on the trailer-mounted pilot unit. The State Board staff has indicated that they will not fund any of the work performed on the.pilot unit as this has the connotation of research work . Grant funds can only be used for procedures ·leading to construction of treatment facilities. We believe it is necessary that additional work be performed on the pilot unit in conjunction with the Step I grant authorization to develop design criteria required to construct the 1 mgd con - tinuous flow faci l ity . It is the staff 's recommendation that the Boards declare their intent to provide matching funds not to ex - ceed $100,000 contingent upon receipt of the State and Federal grant authorization to build and operate the 1 .mgd continuous flow faci l ity. Included in the agenda supporting documents is a Memoran- dum from the Districts' Chief Engineer, explaining in fuller detail the current status of the JPL process. · District No. 3 No. 26 -Final Environmental Impact Report f.or Knott Inter- ceptor , Reaches 5-8, Contract No . 3-20 . The actions appearing on the agenda formally approve ~he Environmental Impact Report for the above -named segment of the proposed Knott Interceptor Sewer . Copies of the final report are i ncluded. The staff recommends approval. District No. 7 No. 37 -Final Environmental Impact Report for the Tustin- Orange Trunk Sewer, Reaches 10 -18, Contract No . 7-6-5 .~ The actions appearing on the agenda formally approve the Environme ntal Impact Report for the above -named segment of the propos ed Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewe r. Copies of the final report are included with the agenda material . -5- No. 38 -Engineering Design Proposal for Reaches 10, 11, and a Portion of Reach 12 of the Tustin -Orange Trunk Sewer. Enclosed is a proposal from Boyle Engineering Corporation to provide engineering design services for the Tustin-Orange Trunk · Sewer from Redhill and Mitchel l to Fairhaven and Esplanade. The preliminary engineer's estimate for construction is $1,214 ,000. We anticipate the work will be let as two contracts. The engineer's design fee for both contracts is $57,847 ($63,855 minus $6,008 credited for the completed preliminary engineering studies). The design cost is well below the reconunended ASCE fee for comparable projects; therefore, the staff reconunends acceptance of the pro- posal. District No . 11 No. 45 -Bolsa Chica State Beach Annexation (Annexation No. 17). The standard resolution appearing in the agenda orders annexa- tion of 3.55 acres to the District in the viciniti of Warner Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway. The Board declared its intent to annex this property on March 13, 1 974. No. 46 -Agreement to Provide Sewer Service for the Bolsa Chica State Beach. The staff has been meeting with representatives of the State Department of Parks and Recreation relative to the preparation of an agreement to provide for the acceptance of up to 172,800 gallons of sewage per day from the Bolsa Chica State Park which will be in the District once the pending Annexation No. 17 is completed. Basically, the State has agreed to pay the sum of $60,480 (which includes $990 for Annexation No. 17) for the capacity rights. In addition, the District will collect user fees, currently $85 per million gallons of sewage discharged . It is recommended that Resolution No . 74-97-11 be approved, authorizing execution of an agreement with the State Department of Parks and Recreation , in form acceptable to the General Counsel . -6- Fred A. Harper General Manager ~-. Report of the Joint Chairman No. 7 -Election of Vice Joint Chairman, utilizing the same Canvassing Committee. No. 9 -Report of the Joint Chairman. Call meeting of the Executive Committee for 5:30 p.m., Tuesday, July 30th. Invite 2 of the following Directors to attend and parti- cipate in the discussions: Directors Callahan, Graham, Kaywood, MacKain. No. 18 -Other Business. Call the Boards into executive session to discuss a personnel matter. Ask that the General Manager, General Counsel, Chief Engineer, and Director of Finance remain in the room. Chairman Porter July 10, 1974 Item No. 6 -Election of Joint Chairman. Appoint a Canvassing Committee of the General Counsel and two Directors, to poll the ballots. f BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation D istricts Post Office Box 8 127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis A ven u e Founta i n Volley, Calif., 9 2708 Tel ephone s: II (1 ) (2) ( 3 ) ( 4 ) F1LE ···-·-········· t en~R A/C c .... ~-~~-~-·Jiil Is ·······-················- ·-················-··- JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE JULY 10, 1974 -7:30 P.M. Pl edge o f Allegiance and I nvocat i on Ro ll Ca ll Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962-24 1 1 AGENDA AD JOUR~llf.EN TS ...... .":::: ..... - CO:;;p .•, t.i lL E.t\GE .... J.-:'.-:'.':° ... nLES S£T ur .................... .. P.[Sau;;;::i ::s c:rn :r:rn.,,.......- LEnrns VIR ITTEN ............. . 1.\INUTES VHll TTEN .... ~ .. . MI NU TES FI LED ......... .'::::: •• Appo i ntment of Cha i rmen p r o tern, i f necessary 11.3 _Q~ DISTRICT 2 Considerat ion of mot i o n to r eceive and file minute exc e rptsfr om the City o f Pl acentia r egarding elect i on of mayo r a nd appoint me n t of aiter nat e , and seating new membe r s of the Boar ds (*Mayor) DIST. NO. ACTIVE ALTERNATE ~~ A<_4 c~, 2 Michae l J. Ca l lahan Robert B . Ly ons* 3 ~~ ~~"""" ~v~ ~ ~i(~·.E "F ILE .•..•.•..•...• {-5) DI STRI CT 8 .... ·1-;...,u_ ~ .............. An n ual election of Chairman '-fl'IN'<.""" A/c •••. TKLR (6) Annual e l ect i on of J o i nt Cha i rman . t.U ~ pages "A" and "B" ______ ................ . ---·-···-c1 ) (8 ) Fi l £:_.,. ........... . lETIE R ···-··-···- A/C .... TKLR •••• ~~:~::~::~.::~::~ FILE •.•....••••.••• 5 LETTER ........... _ ( ,,,.... A/C .... TKLR • ·( 1 1 ) ·--· .. ················•• / An n ual e l ec tion of Vice Joint Ch a irman"'l'.Y~ EACH DI ST RI CT Conside rati on o f mot i o ns a pp r ovi ng min utes o f the fo llow i ng meet i ngs , as mail ed: Ml s Dist ri ct 1 June 1 2, 1974 r egular and June 26 , 1974 a djourned lhls Dist rict 2 J u n e 12 , 1974 regular and June 26 , 1 974 adjo u r n ed 1•\I ':> Di strict 3 Jun e 1 2 , 1974 r egu l ar and June 26 , 197 4 adjourned 11t1.5 Dist rict 5 June 12, 1974 r egular an d June 26 , 1 974 adjourn e d f'!I /) Di s trict 6 June 1 2 , 1 974 regular and cJ:rll June 26 , 1 974 a djourned -a.At~ • · NI/ ') Di s t r ic t 7 J u ne 1 2 , 1 9 7'4 r egul ar and J une 26 , 1 974 a djourned ,..,, .s Di strict 8 Ap r il 10 , 1 974 regular "'!/') District 11 June 1 2, 1974 r egu l a r and June 26 , 1 97 4 adjourned ALL DI STRI CTS Report o f the J o int Chairman ALL DI STRI CTS Re p ort of t he Ge n eral Manager AL L DISTRI CTS Repo r t of t h e General Co u nsel (12) ALL DISTRICTS Roll Call Vote or Cast CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions inc luded on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the i tem to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Una ni mous Ballot Consideration of action to approve all agenda i terns appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. FILE ..........•..•.••• -....._ ~--············ A /C •..• TKLR .••• ~~R .. ~. FILE .....•••........•• LETIER •....••.•••.•• A/C .••. TKLR •••• ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 74-90, approving plans and spec ifications for Additional Pumping Facilities at Ocean Outfall Pump ing Station, Job No. J-6 -1; and authorizing the General Manager to establish the bid date upon receipt of approval from State and Federal agencies. See page "C" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 , to the plans and spec ifications for the Shops and Warehouse Building at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-13, authorizing an addition of $20,520.54 and g r ant ing an extension of time of 2 42 calendar days to the contract with J. Ray Construction Company. See page "D" FI LE •...... ~... ( C) Consideration of motion accepting proposal of Testing Engineers, Inc., dated June 20, 197 4 , for conducting in-process pipe testing for the 1974 -75 fiscal year i n accordance with the rates stipulated in said proposal . !\.ETIE R •. S?..'?..~ A/C ••.• TKLR ·-· FI LE ....•..•.......••• LETIER ·······-····· A/C .•.. TKLR ..•• -·························· FILE ................. . LETIER ·······-···- A/C ·8·-· .............. ~---·······- (d) (e ) See page "E" Cons ideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1, to the plans and specifications for Activated Sludge Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl -1 6 , incorporating F ederal Minimum Wage Rates into the contract with Donovan Construction Company of Minnesota. See page "F 11 Consid e ration of Resolution No. 74-91, ad opting Amendment No. 2 to the Districts' Guidelines Impleme nting the California Environme ntal Quality Act of 1970, as amended , to conform with recent chan ge s in State r e g ula- tions, as recommended by the General Couns e l . Se e page "G" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 3 ) -2 - (12) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) FILE "? •. ~ ........... ( f ) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Fischer & Porter Company against Mel Gorham Construction Company, Contractor for Power Reliability Project ·at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-20, in the amount of $10,153.50 LETTER ........... •• A/C •••. TKLR ... . ......,__ ............... . FILE ................. .. LETTER .••.•.•..•.••• A/C •••• TKLR •••• FILE ·······-···-·- LETTER ·······-···- A/C •••• TKLR •••• ..._·-·-········-··- .......... ._ .. -... ....... FILE ···············- LETTER ... ~ A/C •••• TKLR ··- ·--··-·-····--- ....... --·----···· ..... (g) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3, to the plans and specifications for Digesters "N" & "O" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-21, authorizing an addition of $860.36 and granting an extension of time of 117 calendar days to the contract with Hemisphere Constructors. See page "H" (h) Consideration of motion granting a one-half step increase to Districts' Assistant Engineer, Donald Bogart, from Range 53C, Step 3.5 ($1222) to Step 4 ($1254) (i) Consideration of motion to receive and file claim of Theresa Rosales filed by John Covas, dated June 24, 1974, in the amount of $10,200.00, for alleged injuries incurred in an accident involving a District-owned vehicle, authorizing filing of late claim, and denying said claim, as recommended by the General Counsel (j) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress report on Treatment Plant Construction projects. See page "I" FILE .B::~.'f... DISTRICT 2 meR ···--··· ~C •••• TKLR •••• fl r~ ,;""'.'' -l-J,~ ...... ~ Ml .. •a-.u ... .-..... ._. FllE -- LETTER ............ ... A/C •••. TKLR ··- ···-··-·········-~ ·--·---·-·--- f1LE ....•.•.•.••..•••. v- (k) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 74-92-2, approving plans and specifications for Yorba Linda Pump Station, Contract No. 2-15, and authorizing advertising for bids on September 4, 1974 (1) Consideration of motion approving the following Change Orders to the plans and specifications for the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, and authorizing changes to the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting Company as follows: Change Order No. 14 -Deduction of $14,970.00 See page "J" Change Order No. 15 -Time extension of 18 calendar days. See page "K" tmER ............ ~ (m) Consideration of Resolution No. 74-93-2, accepting the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, as complete; authorizing execution of Notice of Completion; and .., ' ~ •••• TKLR •••• i..!:'.:.:±. ___ y ··LE ·······--- ~nER---···-···- A/C •••• TKLR .... ____ ....... ...... (n) approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "L" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1, to the plans and specifications for the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Katella Avenue to LaPalma Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-2, authorizing a change in method of construction, at no cost to the District, in the contract with Kasler Corporation and L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc., a Joint Venture. See page "M" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (12) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) DISTRICT 2 (continued) (o) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress report on the construction of the Santa Ana River Inter- ceptor from Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-2. See page "N" DISTRICT 3 FILE .... .._ ... """"""'"" ( p ) lEnER ...... ,,. .. ,en A/C •••• TKLR "" ' .... (q) :. __ FILE .•• ~ ••••• LEnER ........ :.: ..... A/C •. _TKLR •••• --~ -·---••• --:(:?; / ----------..... ,. .... (r) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3, to the plans and specifications for the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18 granting an extension of 39 calendar days to the contract with A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Co., a Joint Venture. See page "O" Consideration of Resolution No. 74-99-3, approving and authorizing execution of agreement with the City of Stanton, in form approved by General Counsel, to incorporate con- struction of City storm drain and street improvements into the contract for the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 & 6, Contract No. 3-20-1, and providing for reimbursement of City's share of cost to the District. See page "P" Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress report on construction of the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18. See page "Q" DISTRICT 5 FIL! ...............••• lEnER ............•. ~ A/C .... TKLR •••• ----------·-········· -----··--........ ( s) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1, to the plans and specifications for Manhole Replacement and Repair, Contract No. 5-14R-3, authorizing waiver of fire insurance requirements in the contract with Rewes- Schock, a Joint Venture. See page "R" DISTRICT 11 (t) FILE -··-··-·-- ~~-·:;-··i.{ •. A/C •••. TKLR •••• ----·--··--......._ ____ .....,... FILE ................. . l.EmR ·-··········· A/C .... TKLR -·· ·----·-···-·-··--- FILE .••••••..•...•..•. lETrER ······--·~:_ >.JC ••.. TKL~ ·-· _____ : ______ , __ ...J_' ......._. .......... _._ .. ... (u) -~;/ (v) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny the following claims submitted by General Telephone Company in connection with construction of the Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension, Contract No. 11-12, as recommended by the General Counsel: Dated June 7, 1974 in the amount of $ 435.43 Dated June 10, 1974 in the amount of Dated June 21, 1974 in the amount of 2,200.00 3,271.48 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3, to the plans and specifications for Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension, Contract No. 11-12, au~horizing an addition of $5,015.00 to the contract with Kordick & Son, Inc. See page "S" Consideration of Resolution No. 74-95-11, accepting Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension, Contract No. 11-12, as complete; authorizing execution of Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "T" FILE ••••••• _ • .(lJ) ALL DISTRICTS LETrER ............... -Consideration of i terns deleted from consent calendar, if any A/C •••• TKLR •• ,. \~ ( ~) \ ···-----············~ -----···-··--~ -4- (14) EACH DISTRICT FfLE (a) LETIER ·--"'"" lYj \ <; Consideration of motion to receive and file General Counsel's memorandum of June 27, 1974, re Conflicts of :~~~~ Interest. See page "U" Report of General Counsel re Conflict·s of Interest Further consideration by each District of Guidelines for Implementation of the Governmental Conflicts of Interest Act. For copies of Districts' existing Guidelines' resolutions stayed by the Boards on April 10, 1974 : Districts 1, 2, 3 & 11 See page "V" Districts 5, ~ & 7 See page "W" (15) ~ISTRICTS ~ Staff report on grant funding for JPL Process PILE •.•• ____... ey. .. ::Rt~~ (b) Consideration of motion authorizing extension of participa- tion with .J e t Propulsion Labora tory of Cal Tech in .their .M L. experimental pilot project for reactivated carbon wastewater t'tf:::;> treatment process, for an amount not to exceed $10,000 A/C •••. TKLR •••• --·-··••000400-- *"-·-··-··-- (16) ' ( c) > Consideration of motion declaring intent to match funds with JPL and NASA in an amount not to exceed $100,000 for any additional process development work to be p e rfor med on the JPL trailer mounted pilot unit, conting ent up on receipt of state and federal grant authorization (Step l Grant) to proceed with the construction and operation of a l MGD reactivated carbon wastewater treatment process facility ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file certification of the General Mana g er that he has checked all bills a p pea ring on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authoriza tion for payment (17) ALL DISTRICTS (17) Con siderat ion of r o ll call vote motion approving J oint ROLL CALL VOTE .. /l~j ~ Operating and Capital Outlay Revolv ing Fund warrant L I books for s i gnature of the Ch a irman of Di s t rict No . l, ITEMS Or• f l 1ms li t d "I" SUPPLEMEHTAl AGEN DA and authorizing payment o c a s e on page flLE ···-·-·'"="~;;ALL DI STRICTS £ ~ } ..,.. fl·."/ o -~ ·. _s-v LETTER ............. ~ Oth e r bus ine ss and cormnunications or supplemental a g end a A/C .... TKLR .... ite~s' if any -.. 7 -;vi lS> ·-t~ ............ . (18) Con sid e r a tion of motion r a tifying action of Gen e r al Manager in i s suing p u r chase orde r t o W. J. Foster Con s tructi on Comp any i n the am ount of $2 ,8 50.00 for emerge n cy con st ruc tion of Plant No. 2 dige ster over flow treatment beds ITEMS ON SU Pi'L EMENTAl AGE'NOA <->E.:s . (19 ) QIS~RIC~S 1 & 7 Oon:!iaerat;ieR e f mot;ieR a 1919 rev1Rg e'tle19eRe e f 'tlfi8: warrant-a , if aRY• See e'tlf9J9lem c nt;a l a ~enaa at t achment (20) DIS ~R I G~ l Ge n sie c ratiofi of mo t;ion a 1919 reviRg warre:Hte, i f aRy. See supplemenb~l a g enda a t;t;aefimeA t (21) DISTRI CT 1 \ ~ther u s ines "--1.t...em s , i f a n y (2 2) DISTRI CT 1 comzmrfiica:~_~or ~ement a l a ge n d a Cons i de r a ti on o f motio n t o adjourn J -._5:? (2 3 ) DI STRIC T 2 mMs o ~ I"\)<;. ( 23) Cons i der at ion of motion approvin g warrants . SUJlr E NT.Al ~-Dl See page "II" r. ···~-~~·: "( 2 4) '!STRICT 2 LETIER f"......... Other busines s and c ommunications or s upple me ntal agend a A/C A K\R ···· items , i f an y -\31--··... (2 4) Cons ideration of mo t ion to r e c e ive and file Stop No t ice ' Xs~f.r· / s u bm itted by F . B. Co o k Corp or at i on against Su lly-Mill er SUP~'iJi~rAl. AGENDA IV\ S Cont r act i ng , Co n trac t or fo r t he Santa Ana River Interce p t or from Re clamation Plant No . 1 t o Kat e lla Av e nue, Con t ra c t ~~ ~""~ o . 2-14-1 , in the a mount o f $29,16 5 .10 ( 2 5') -I-S-T ICT 2 Con s i de r a tion of motion to a djourn J!>'. 5 ~ -5- (26) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of actions required by the District's Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, re proposed Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5-8, ~\\S Contract No. 3-20: (Final EIR mailed with agenda material) FI LE ~.~.~€·a·) Consideration of motion to receive and file comments Lme11 .............. received from the following agencies pursuant to the AJc .... TKLR .... Draft Environmental Impact Report for said facility ---·-(Copies included in EIR): City of La Habra, dated April 15, 1974 City of Fullerton, dated April 19, 1974 City of Stanton, dated April 19, 1974 City of Garden Grove, dated April 23, 1974 City of Huntington Beach, dated April 26, 1974 Orange County Planning Department, dated May 1, 1974 City of Stanton, dated May 30, 197 4 City of Fountain Valley, dated June 11, 1974 City of La Habra, dated June 13, 1974 City of Brea, dated June 14, 1974 City of Stanton, dated June 20, 197 4 City of Stanton, dated June 25, 1974 City of Cypress, dated June 27, 1974 City of Huntington Beach, dated June 28, 1974 City OY We~tminste~, d~ted June 27; 197 4 LETIER ·····•••·•·••• A/C •.. .1KLR ·••• ( b ) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Final Environmental Impact Report for Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5-8, Contract No. 3-20 ---·-- (27) DI8TRIGT£ 3 & 11 Consideration of motion approving suspense fund waPrants, ·if any. Bee--8-ti~emen-tal ageHda attachffieRt- (28) DISTRICT 3 m~c~ (28) Consideration of motion approving warrant s . suPrttMWJAl AGcNDA ft\.} s See page "II " (29) DISTRIC~...-~ ~ ~ther busines-& ~nd commu -i.~at-~ons or supplemental agenda items, if any ~ (30) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn :ii". 59 (31) DISTRICT 5 ITEMSON (31) Consideration of motion approving warran ts. s u ?PLEM ENTAL AGENt>A IV\ ls See page "II" (32) DISTRICT 5 Qthe_:: business i17ems, if any nd commtlril:-c-atiQill5-0~upplemental agenda (33) ( 3 lf) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn Cl :S>-C DIS'3?RIC'3? 6 Consideration of motion approving uarrants, if any. See stt~~lemental agei'i6a attachment (35) DISTRICT 6 (36) Gther bus~rress and c items, if any unicatio s or sup -lemental agenda DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn 9 :s-a -6- (37) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of actions required by the District's Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, re proposed Tustin-Orange Tr.unk Sewer, Reaches 10-18, Contract No. 7-6-5 : (Final EIR mailed with agenda material ) rtLE --~~-~.::::. ~ Consideration of motion to receive and file comments LETTE R.............. ( received from the following agencies pursuant to the AJc .... TKLR •• ../It ~ Draft Environmental Impact Report for said facility ---··••••HO. __ ... _ LETTER ............ .. (Copies included in EIR) Orange County Road Department, dated April 11, 1974 City of Tustin, dated April 11, 1974 Southern Pacific Transportation Co., dated April 16, 1974 Orange County Road Department, dated April 24, 1974 Orange County Flood Control District, dated April 29, 1974 City of Orange, dated June 20, 1974 Orange County Planning Department, dated June 26, 1974 City of Tustin, dated June 26, 1974 A/C •••• TKLR •••• (b) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Final 1 -············· lS Environmental Impact Report for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, __ ........ /Vl Reaches 10-18, Contract No. 7-6-5 (38) FILE .••.. v.:'.':.M. I <;,. ~~,f!::.~ A/C .... TKLR •••. DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal submitted by Boyl e Engineering Corporation, dated July 3, 1974, for engineering services in connection with preparation of plans and specifications for Tusti~~orange Trunk Sewer, Reaches 10, 11 and a portion of Reach 12, for a fee of $63,855.00, less preliminary engineering fees of $6,008.00 , for a net total design fee not to exceed $57,847.00. See page "X" (39) DISTRICT 7 -. (39) Consideration of motion approving warrants. "EMS ON I s "III" SUP~cNTA L AGEND Jl\ll s ee page (40) DISTRICT 7 \Other buffi~ co~Ri-ca:t--3..~:c.-s-upplemental agenda items , if any (41) DISTRICT 7 ~/ Consideration of motion to adjourn 9.-~;r- (42) DISTRICT 8 ROLL CALL VOTE' Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the 1974-75 ·~-;--\ Operating Fund Budget in the amount of $1,991.00. See 'v' S page "Y" (43) (44) (45) Roll Call Vote or Cast ~~Ballot ~E RS) ........... f'l1 j s A/( LR •.•• J:..,:'.V.ht.~ . ~-----,~..:. c ~:,! '-"'-;"'_t.:( 4 6 ) Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot ~~/ . (FllE / .......... " ........ \..._.; a-- I.ETIER -~:rn Is A/C ...• TKlR - ... ~<21.~ ···-······-··--- n.a~uni.ca-t·ron8-or-5u.pp.J. emen t al agenda DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion to adjour n f~oS"""" DISTRICT 11 Consideration of Resolution No ... 74-96-11, ordering annexation of approximately 3,55 acres to the District in the vicinity of Warner Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway Alternate (Annexation No. 17 -Bolsa Chica State Beach Annexation t o County Sanitation District No. 11) See page "Z" DISTRICT 11 Consideration of Resolution No. 74-97-11, approving an d authorizing execution of agreement with State Department of Parks and Recreation, in form approved by General Counsel, for disposal of sewage originating within the Bolsa Chica State Beach and providing for payment thereof to the District. See PEtge "AA" -7- .. (47) DISTRICT 11 MS ON (47) Consideration of motion approving warrant s . ITT 1/ "III" suPPlEMENTAL AGENDA tY1t $ See page (48) DISTRICT _lJ (49) OtUJ,er busine~ and /c-ommtl£~G-a~~ons or supplemental agenda items, if any DISTRICT 11 Considerati o n of motion to adj o urn 1 : () S:-- -8- II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8 12 7 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones : ALL DISTRICTS JOINT BOARDS SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS JULY 10; 1974 -7:30 P.M. Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA (17) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating a·nd Cap i ta l Outlay Revolv ing Fund warrant bo oks for signature of the Chairman of District No . 1, and authorizing payment of claims lis ted on page "I" (18) Consideration of motion ratifying action of Genera l Manager in issuing purchase order to W. J . Foster Construction Company in the amount. o f $2, 850 . 00 f or emergency const ructi on o f Plant No . 2 digester overflow treatment beds DISTRICT 2 (2 3) Consideration o f motion approving warrants . See page "I I " (24) Consideration of mot i o n to r ece ive and file Stop Not i ce submitted by F. B. Cook Corporat ion · against Sully -Miller Contracting , Contractor for the Santa Ana River Interceptor fro m Rec l amation Plant No . 1 to Ka te l la Avenue, Con tract No . 2 -1 4 -1 , in the amount of $29 ,165 .10 bISTRICT 3 (28) Consideration of motion app roving warrants . See page "II" DISTRICT 5 (31) Consideration of motion approving warrant~. See page "II" DISTRI CT 7 (39) Consideration of motion approving warrants . See page "III" DISTRICT 11 (47) Consideration of motion approving warrants . See page "III" WARRANT NO. 23256 23257 23258 23259 23260 I 23261 23262 23263 232 64 232 65 23266 232 67 23268 23269 23270 23271 23272 23273 23274 23275 23276 23277 23278 2327 9 23280 2328 1 23282 23283 23284 23285 23286 23287 23288 23289 23290 23291 23292 23293 23294 23295 23296 23297 23298 23299 23300 23301 . 23302 23303 23304 23305 23306 2 3307 23308 23309 2 3 3 1 0 2 3 311 23312 23313 23314 23315 23316 23317 23318 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS I N FAVOR OF Ai r California; Air Fare, Pl-16 Grant Meeting Airpo r t Service, Inc., Orientation Bus Charter Alex Fish Company, Ecological Research Supplies All Bearing Service, Bushings & Hose Allied Bolt & Supply, Hardware Almquist Tool & Equipment, Too ls American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts City of Anaheim, Power Anaheim Sewer Construction, Late ral Repair The Anc hor Packing Co., Pump Packing Apco Supply, Filters Associated Concrete Products,Inc., Man ho le Rings Atomic Absorption News l etter, Technical Journal Banning Battery Company, Batteries Baxter & Cicero, In c ., Ecological Research Supplies Bearing Specialty Company, Bearings Beckman Inst ruments, Lab Supplies Bell Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supp lies Bende r Machine, Inc., Compressor Repair Bishop Graphics, Printing The Black & De cker Mfg. Company, Too l Repair Do n Bogart, Employee Mileage Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Ma g net os Bristol Park Medical Group, I nc ., Pre-empl oyment Exams Broadlick Art Supply, Drafting Suppli e s & Frame s C & R Reconditioning Co., Compr es s p r & Pump Repair Cal's Came r as, Photo Supplie s, Proc essing & Repairs Cal State S eal Company, Gasket s $ AMOUN T 4 8 .70 80 .00 53 .00 370.~~ 90 . 270.58 1,899 .28 62.89 125.00 357.83 14.92 114.48 7.50 364.01 40.28 276.66 20.99 256.16 l_,14 9.35 82 .28 39.60 39.00 1,138 .33 26.00 124.90 1,105 .00 1 62 .83 118.96 1 88 ~s California Auto Collisio n, Inc ., Truck Re p air State of California Board of Equalization, 1973-74 J ohn Carollo Eng inee rs, Eng ineering Service, NPDES Case Power & Equipment , Manual Certanium Alloys & Re search, Welding Suppli e s Certif ied Laboratories, Lubricants Brian Chuchua 's, Truck Parts Sale s Tax 42 4~ Permit 84 .13 1 1 .87 145 .48 1 62 .69 77 .42 Clark Dye Hardware, Too ls Clark Equipment Company, Equipme nt Rental Coast Insurance Agency, Liability I nsurance Pre mium College Lumber Co ., I nc ., Bl dg . Matls. & Hardware Consolidated Electric Co ., Electric Supplies Consolidated Electric Distributors, Electric Supplies Constructors Supply Co ., Hardware & Tools Control Specialists, Inc., Regulator & Engine Part s Costa Me sa Auto Parts, Inc ., Truck Parts Costa Mesa County Wate r District, Water Mr. Crane, Crane Rental County of Orange, Printing Crest Leasin g , Vehicle Le ase Clarence S . Cummin g s, Employee Mi l eage Curtin Matheson Scie ntif ic, Inc.; Lab Supplies C. R. Davis Supp ly Company, Hose Richard S . Dawson Company, Pump Parts De Gu e lle & Sons Glass Company, Tru ck Repair De l Ch e mical Corp o rati on , Cl ean er Department of General Services, Safety Ma nuals Diamond Core Drilling Compa ny, Co r e Dr ill ing Diana Distributors , Cl eane r Diese l Contro l Co r p ., Filte r s Dominguez Marine & Industrial Supply Co ., Pipe Supplies Dow Chem ica l Compa ny, Chemicals (MO 1 -10-73 ) Ida L . Du esber g , Emp l oyee .M ileage Wilbur R. Eads , Employee Mil eage Eastman, Inc ., Off ice Suppl ies I-1 9 4.88 593.60 31,97 3 .00 14 3 . 2 1 ~33 .87 4 69 .46 li87 . 0 9 122 .54 408.07 6 .oo 121.54 8 .o o 14 7 .28 48.30 326 .7 1 1 65 .3 6 1 23 .82 76 .48 37 ...,6 5 280 .00 2 12 .4 5 2 45 .75 357 .11 1,65 3.32 23 .94 8 .40 88 .33 . WARRAN'r NO. 23319 23320 23321 23322 23323 1324 ~325 ' 23326 23327 23328 23329 23330 23331 23332 23333 23334 23335 23336 23337 23338 23339 2331.Jo 233LJ1 233LJ2 23343 23344 23345 23346 23347 23348 ~ 1349 ~350 23351 23352 23353 23354 23355 23356 23357 23358 23359 23360 23361 23362 23363 23364 23365 23366 23367 23368 23369 23370 23371 23372 23373 -i374 ¥3375 23376 . 23377 23378 23379 23380 23381 23382 23383 23384 IN FAVOR OF Electric Supplies Distributing, Electric Supplies Enchanter, Inc., Oceanographic Service (MO 2-13-74) Enterprise Printing Company, Spec. Supplies & Printing FMC Corporation, Vibrator Parts Fibre Glass Evercoat Co., Inc. Fiberglass Supplies Finishers' Management, Technical Journal Fischbeck Plumbing, Lateral Repair Fischer &.Porter Company, Metering Equip.& Supplies City of Fountain Valley, Water William Fox, Employee Mileage France Products Division, Pump Parts Edward R. Francis, CWPCA Conference Expense (MO 6-13-73) Frederick Pump & Engineering, Pump Parts Freeway Machine and Welding, Machining Larry Fricker Company, Inc., Weed Killer Garden Grove Lumber & Cement, Building Materials General Electric Supply Co., Electric Supplies General Telephone Company Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine Contract 1-1-73 Goldenwest Fertilizer Co., Grit Removal Hach Chemical Company, Inc., Chemicals & Lab Supplies Hardware Systems Company, Lab & Ecological Research Supplies Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting & COD Expenses Harrington Industrial Plastics, Pipe Supplies Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal Hertz Car Leasing Division, Leased Vehicles Hewlett Packard, Training Seminar Howard Supply Company, Pipe Suppli~s Hundley Company, Inc., Controls City of Huntington Beach, Water & Technical Manual Huntington Beach Equipment Rentals, Equipment Rental Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware International Business Machines, Mtce. Agrm. & Office Sup. International Harvester Co., Truck Parts Irvine Ranch Water District, Water Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supplies King Bearing, Inc., Bushings & Bearings s. P. Kinney Engineers, Inc., Strainer Parts Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tools and Tool Repair L & N Uniform Supply Company, Uniform Service The La.cal Company, Inc., Pump Packing R. H. Landin Graphics, Printing Lavender Fastener Company, Hardware Lawless Detroit Diesel, Equipment Parts Judy Lee, Employee Mileage Mc Coy Ford Tractor, Equipment Parts John Mc Cullough, Employee Mileage Mc Graw-Hill Publications Co., Technical Journal Mc Master-Carr Supply Company, Hardware Majestic Fasteners Company, Hardware · Mar Vac Electronics, Electronic Supplies & Tools Master Blueprint & Supply Co., SOP Printing Mine Safety Appliances Company, Test Equipment Mobil Oil Corporation, Grease National Lumber & Supply, Buildlng Materials City of Newport Beach, Water Newport Supply Company, Hose C. Arthur Nissan, Gen 1 l. Counsel Retainer & Qrtly. Chgs. Nolex Corporation, Reproduction Supplies Oranco Supply Company, Pipe Supplies City of Orange, Water Orange County Chemical Company, Chemicals Orange County Water District, Water Replenishment Orange County Wholesale Electric, Electric Supplies Overhead Door Company of Orange County, Inc., Door Repair I-2 AMOUNT 188.50 3,000.00 231.93 251.57 84.77 5.00 85.00 3,261.42 40.00 27.90 271.10 145. 42 55.57 222.60 1.05 190.01 188.65 765. 01. 4,061.71 2,904.oo 263.63 141.93 208.11 14.25 70.00 567.62 150.00 1,193.15 496.69 49.13 25.20 260.53 9LJ7. 26 5.11 2.30 505.99 78.21 102.14 35.74 576.42 2,476.80 292.93 91.J.55 170.19 89. 57 67.35 153.29 102.12 7.50 117.08 137.31 44.56 63.23 78.40 53.05 66.13 315.21 55.65 2,587.50 570.17 1,310.52 9.82 76.00 102.50 94. 26 131.06. WARRANT NO. . . 23385 23386 23387 23388 23389 23390 23391 ' 23392 23393 23394 23395 23396 23397 23398 23399 23400 23401 23402 23403 23404 23405 23lto6 231-to7 23408 23409 23410 23411 23412 23413 23414 23415 23416 23417 23418 23419 23420 23421 23422 23423 23424 23425 23426 23427 23428 23429 23430 231~31 231-t 32 23433 23434 23435 23436 23437 23438 23439 231~40 23441 23LJ1.J2 23L143 23444 23445 23446 231~47 IN FAVOR OF Pacific Pumping Company, Freight Pacific Telephone M. C. Patten & Co., Inc., Gauges & Hardware Petrolane, Propane Postmaster R & S Sales Company, Blower Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts Rodale Press, Inc., Technical Journal Roseburrough Tool, Inc., Hardware Routh Transportation, Oil Removal & Disposal Ruff's Saw Service, Tools Ryan Herco, Pipe & Pipe Supplies S & J Chevrolet, Truck Parts Santa Ana Blue Print Company, Printing Santa Ana Book Store, Inc., Technical Manual Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Rewind & Repairs Santa Anita Blueprint, Inc., Printing Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies Sashco, Inc., Door Repair Scientific Products, Lab Supplies Scott Refrigeration Service, Inc., Equipment Repair City of Seal Beach, Water Richard J. Shaffer, Whse. & Purch. Consultant (MO 2-13-74) Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Supplies John Sigler, Employee Mileage Fred Sinasek, Employee Mileage South Orange Supply, Pipe Supplies Southern California Edison Southern California Gas Company Southern California Water Co., Water Southwest Flexible Co., Machine Tools Southwest Processors, Inc., Oil Disposal Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Oil Company of California, Oil & Gasoline Starow Steel, Steel State Compensation Insurance Fund, Workmans Comp.Ins.Prem. Supreme Steam, Carpet Cleaning Surveyors Service Company, Survey Supplies Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage Taylor-Dunn, Equipment Parts Tiernan's Office Equipment, Machine Repair Treck Photographic, Inc., Photo Equipment J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Hardware & Blower Parts Tustin Water Works, Water U. S. Divers Company, Equipment Repair U. s. Equipment, Compressor Parts Union Oil Company, Gasoline United Auto Parts, Truck Parts United Reprographics, Inc., Printing United States Government Printing· Office, Fed'l. Regist~r Utilities Supply Company, Tools Valvate Associates, Pump Parts Wallace & Tiernan, Gaskets John R. Waples, R.S., Odor Consultant Guy L. Warden & Sons, Pump Parts West Coast Industries, Freight Western Salt Company, Salt Westinghouse Electric Corp., Electric Supplies White, J?ine & Ambrogne, Dr., Prof. Serv. (MO ·5-8-74) Wilson Engine & Equipment Co., Gaskets World Travel Bureau, Inc., Air Fare, (MO 6-12-74) I-3 , • > • AMOUNT 36.74 462 .ln 530.32 12.89 lt28. 80 412 .. r-, 40~~ 2,474.76 6.oo 33.13 211.32 129.68 357.93 37.97 291.95 19.08 309.17 40.07 193-97 351.39 122.17 109.08 8.80 400.00 684.93 9.90 33. '"(8 177.45 40,539.69 543. 16 3.cc; 1, 0 34 ·'---,,_ ___ _ 293. 0'1 61.65 455.31 2,191.09 932.73 14,ooo.oo 600.00 2.57 37.62 71.83 22.50 78.21 388.57 82.20 30.22 989.51 74.53 607.06 696.22 45.00 23.91 1,038.70 45.56 218., ') 38~ 7 .4.2 50.35 121.25 1,500.00 128.90 193.27 WARRANT NO. . . 23448 23449 23450 23451 23452 23453 23454 23455 23456 23457 23458 23459 23460 23461 23462 23463 23464 23465 IN FAVOR OF Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Service George Yardley Associates, Filter Zodiac Paper Company, Reproduction Supplies TOTAL JOINT OPERATING CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS AMOUNT 46.50 1,009.77 95.40 242.12 $ 155,504.08 Bruning Division, Drafting Equipment $ 110.44 11,111.20 4,345.98 270,000.00 38,700.00 127.15 John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Service Brian Chuchua's, New Vehicle (MO 2-13-74) _ Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16 E.T.I. & Kordick, Contractor I-8-3 Electroni.c Business Machines, Office Equipment Hemisphere Constructors, Contractor P2-21 Howard Supply Co., Tools Huntington Beach Equipment Rentals, Tools C. J. Madigan Truck Co., Relocate Equipment J. Ray Construction Company, Contractor J-13 State of Calif. Board of Equalization, 1973-74 Sales Tax Sully Miller Contracting Co., Release Retention PW-033 Twining Laboratories, Testing P2-21 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF I-4 54,281.01 361.25 159.00 359.95 17,186.46 431.10 1,552.20 351.00 $ 399,076.74 $ 554,580.82 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCID"1ULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF' 23466 23467 23468 23469 23470 23471 234.72 23473 23475 23476 23477 23478 23479 23480 23481 County of Orange, dompaction Tests 2-14-2 K.E.C. Company, Refund Overpayment Plans & Specs 2-18 Kasler Corporation & L.H. Woods & Sons, Contractor 2-14-2 Lowry and Associates, Construction Survey 2-14-1 C. Arthur Nissan, Litigation re Easement 2-14-1 Everett S. Schmid, Easement Appraisal 2-14~1 Sully Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 2-14-1 Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Testing 2-14-2 DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF' Boyle Engineering, Engineering re Fa.cility Relocation ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering· Service 3-18 3-20-1, 3-20-2, 3-20-3 County of Orange, Compaction Tests 3-18 The Register, Bid Notice 3-19 Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Testing 3-18 A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Saliba, Contractor 3-18 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF City of Newport Beach, Connection Fee Administration Rewes-Schock, Contractor 5-14R-3 II $ $ $ $ ~ ~ $ AMOUNT 53.75 20.00 398,337.30 7,010 ' 788~ 930.00 10,526.82 3~016.00 420,682.26 880.00 30,630.25 108.57 74 ') 468~ 370~895.40 402~176.42 403~056.42 1,313.75 3,314.65 $ 4,628.40 . ,. . .. WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 23482 23483 23484 i-1L85 Galy Properties, Refund Plan Check Fee Balance $ 490.50 65.61 129.83 5,134.40 10.00 112.39 150.00 ~86 23487 23488 23489 23490 23491 23492 Hollenbeck Developement, Refund Plan Check Fee Balance Home Construction, Refund Plan Check Fee Balance Irvine Industrial Complex, Refund Plan Check Fee Balance Local Agency Formation Commissicn, Annexation Processing Fee Smith Developement, Refund Plan Check Fee Balance Valley Consultants, Refund Plan Check Fee Balance FIXED OBLIGATION FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF City of Anaheim, Distribution of 73-74 Oil Royalties City of Fullerton, Distribution of 73-74 Oil Royalties City of Orange, Distribution of 73-74 Oil Royalties City of Santa Ana, Distribution of 73-74 Oil Royalties DISTRICT NO. 11 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Kordick and Son., Inc., Contractor 11-12 Twining Laboratories, Pipe Testing 11-12 III $ 6,092.73 $ 989.98 $ 7,082.71 $ 8,221.20 23.25 RESOLUTIONS .AND SUPPORTING. DOCUMENTS July 10, 1974 -7:30 p.m. AGENDA ITEM #6 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY CITY HALL 10200 SLATER AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 FROM THE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR RESUME GEORGE B. SCOTT QUALIFICATIONS: SANITATION DISTRICT 3 -2 years DISTRICT 2 -1 year CHAffiMAN, WATER PRICING COMMITTEE FOUNTAIN VALLEY CITY EXPERIENCE: PARKS & RECREATION.COMMISSION -6 ~ears CITY COUNCIL -· 5 years MAYOR -2 years ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENTAL PARTICIPATION: LEAGUE OF CITIES DELEGATE -5 years CRIMINAL JUSTICE COUNCIL -4 years CHAIRMAN, LEAGUE HANDICAPPED COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN, LEAGUE BYLAWS COMMITTEE F.V. DELEGATE TO I.C.C. CHAIRMAN, HUMAN SER VICES COMMITTEE MEMBER, LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE I feel the Sanitatl.on District is a very economically and efficiently operated organization and, if elected your Chairman, I will make every effort to see its high standards are maintained and improved wherever humanly possible. Supplemental agenda items will be kept at a minimum, because one should have a chance to read the material before it is voted upon. Executive Sessions will strictly follow its governing policies. -A-ALL DISTRicrrs City of Villa Parl~ Orie Center• J 7855 Santiago Boulel1ard •Villa Park. California 92667 • (714) 998-1500 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS FOR JOINT CHAIRMAN Submitted by DONALD WINN * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Board Member of District No. 2 since May, 1970 Recently elected Chairman of District No. 2 Residence: Villa Park, 10 years; California, 23 years Education: Graduate, Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas Occupation: Winn Equipment Company -Distributor of construction equipment Serving as a Director on the Orange County Sanitation Districts for the past four years has given me an insight into the many problems facing the Districts now and in the future. Because of the complexity of the Districts' affairs, I feel that these years, plus my engineering background and the experience gained in dealing with the construction industry, will be helpful. During the 7 years I have served on the Villa Park City Council, the last 3 years as Mayor and Mayor Pro Tern, I have strived for sound decisions that fairly reflect the thinking of my constituents. If elected your Joint Chairman, I would maintain an open-minded attitude on District business and take a neutral stand on controversial matters, thereby inviting full discussion by all Board members. I would serve all Districts fairly and represent, equally, our needs to the various State and Federal governmental agencies. I would be pleased to serve as Joint Chairman, and ask for your support in the coming election. Don Winn 7-10-74 AGENDA ITEM #6 -B-ALL DrsrrRICTS RESOLUTION NO. 74-90 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NO. J-6-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5,·6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION, JOB NO. J-6-1 * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications, and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by John Carollo Engineers, Districts' Engineers, for construction of ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION, JOB NO. J-6-1, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be directed to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with the Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of ~970, as amended; and, Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 4. That upon receipt of approval from the State Water Resources·Control Board, the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time until ~hich bids will be received and publicly opened and read; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting peld July 10, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #12(a) -C-ALL DISTRICTS cou;rrY SA: J I"L\ TI o:~ DI STI~ I CTS OF OP~\~:GE COU~ffY P. O. Box 8127 -108-l,l Ellis ,\venue Fountain Valley, California 92103 CllA:~GE OIU>ER C ~ 0. KO. 2 J. Ray Construction Company DATE ---Ju-ly_3_,_1_9_7 4---- JOB: Sh!)ps and Warehouse Building, Plant No. 1 -Job No. J-13 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (~'DUJ:il\.'\X) $ 20,520.54 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in th~ contract and/or contract ,.,.ork are hcrebv authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or· dc<luctions ·from the contract price are hereby approvc<.l. ., .. Reference:· Contractor's letters dated .July 9, 1973; ADD: July 23, 1973; August 7, 1973; September 12, 1973; December 11, 1973; December 24; 1973; December 27, 1973; January 28, 1974;. April 4, 1974; April 8, 1974; April 10, 1974; and April 30, 1974 • . Districts' letters dated July 11, 1973; August 10, 1973; September 4, 1973; September 18, 1973; December 19, 1973; December 28, 1973; December 31, 1973; April 22, 1974; April 23, 1974; and June 27, 1974. ITEM DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE /\. B. c. D. E •. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. M. N. ~arehouse Building -Replace existing Door 12 with fire assembly. (Building Code Requirements) Warehouse Building -Add Door 19 in east side of warehouse. (Building Code Requirements) Shops "B" -Reverse door swings at Doors 13 and 15. (Building Code Requirements) Warehouse Building ·-Replace existing Door 11 with fire assembly. (Building Code Requirements) Storage -Revise wainscot at oil storage partition •. (Building Code Requirements) Storage Area -Provide chain link fencing. (Security) Entrance -Add steel fencing at brick wall. (Inadequate visibility) Warehouse and Entrance -Cutting and removing of existing masonry for the above. (Building Cod~ Requirements) Warehouse and Storage -.Painting for the above changes. (Building .Code Requirements) Revised concrete. mix design, painting specifications, roof specifications, added aluminum ladders, fan ducting, changed plumbing lines, revised wall framing and changed flashing at roof. (Facilitate construction & add necessary features) Install fire hydrant. (Fire Department Requirements) Install sheet metal shroud on paint spray booth. (Fire Department Requirements) Install sprinkler system in paint spray booth. (Fire Department Requirements) Extend paving' and fencing at west end of vehicle maintenance building. (Provide add1tional working area) TOTAL ADD AGENDA ITEM #12(b) D-1 • $ . 503.70 607.20 667.00 1,431. 75 784.30 3,737.50 1,777.90 3,593.75 8SLOO 1,025.84 1,811.25 856.75 770.50 2,102.10 $20,520.54 ALL DISTRICTS """' CUU.iHY 0A:UTJ\TIO:~ UlSTIUCTS 01• Ul{J\I\ut LUUr'1 l P. o.· Box 8127 -108-l4 Ellis ,\venue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE 1 OlWER C. 0. NO. · 2 :oNTRACTOR: J. Ray Construction Company ... ---------------------DATE July 3, 1974 JOB: Shops and Warehouse Building, Plant No. 1 -Job ·No. J-13 t_.cnsion of Contract Time The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of time to complete the above changes, allow for delivery time required for cranes, and for inclement weather TOTAL TIME EXTENSION Sununary of Contract Time Original Contract Date. Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion D~te Original Contract Price Prev. Au th. Changes 242 Calendar Days 242 Calendar Days May 19, 1973 180 Calendar Days November 15, 1973 242 Calendar Days 422.Calendar Days July 15, 1974 $ 1,119,712.00 $ (57,723.00) This Change (ADD) f m~~\(~;r~ $ 20,520.54 Aracnclcd DOc1 -1 authorization <late: July 10, 1974 ~ By ----~-----------~C-o_n_s_u~l-t~i-n-g·--cE~.1-1g-1~1-1_e_c_r lly --------------------------,--..~~----Contractor AGENDA ITEM #12(b) D-2 Contract Price s 1,082,509.54 Approved: COU~TY SANITATimJ DISTRICTS of Orange County, California ALL DISTRICTS Testing Engineers, Incorporated Hr. Ray E. Lewis Chief Engineer County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Calif. 92708 Subject: In-Plant Inspection for Fiscal Year, 1974-1975. Dear Mr. Lewis: June.20, 1974 Testing Engineers is very interested in providing the necessary in-plant inspection service for the S2ni·tation Districts for the fiscal year 1974-1975. With our experience in working with you the past year and our personnel, we feel that we are well quali- fied to perform this service for you. Testing Engineers would supply a qualified inspector at each of the pipe plants on a full time basis or as needed. Mr. Louis Perley, Supervisor of Pipe, would also spend some time at each ·plant supervising the operations, as well as working with_ your staff. A daily log would be kept en each size, class and num- ber of pipe produced, and a weekly report would be issued to you covering this information. We presently have on our staff six inspectors, with pipe inspec- tion experience besides Mr. Louis Perley. Mr. Perley has had twenty-five years experience, three of the inspectors have more than twenty years, two have ten to fifteen years experience, and one has about five years. A copy of the final report that would be sent to you is enclosed. This is the same as we have been using for you this past year. Testing Engineers agrees to furnish a qual-ified inspector for . thirteen dollars ($13.0~) per hour. The standard terms and con- d i t i on s as sh m·m on P a 9 e 3 of t he c n c 1 o se d fee sch e du 1 e w i 1 1 apply. Supervision by Mr. Perley at $13.00 per hour, not to exceed t\·tenty hours per week. Bused on a one hundred and sixty- ei ght (168) hour month, one man at each of two plants, plus su- pervision, the monthly figure should be ~pproxirnately $5'~94.00 per month. This wi 11 increase or decrease directly to the hours worked. 11008 South Norwalk Blvd . Santa Fe Sprin_gs. Ca 906 70 • 213-941-3291 • Oakland. Santa Clara. San Diego AGENDA ITEM #12(c) E-1 ALL DISTRICTS Mr. Ray E. Lewi' s -2-June 20, 1974 The aoove rates include the following: (1) One inspector per manufacturing plant. (2) All initial reports. (3) A forty (40) hour straight time week. (4) No over-time, unless approved by the Sanitation Districts pri·or to work. (5) Rates for over-time wil1 be $17.25 per hour for work in ex- cess of eight hours in one day and Saturdays. Also, $21.25 per hour will be charged for work performed .on Sundays or Ho! i days. (6) This sched~le of fees will be effective from July 1, 1974 to June 30, 1975. We appreciate the County Sanitation Districts consideration of Testing Engineers and the opportunity of submitting this pro- posal. We hope that \ale can continue the relationshi·p that.has been established this past year. If there are any questions, please give me a call. Encl: copy of final re ort 1 fee schedule LA TEI 7) JHD:ks #682 AGENDA ITEM #J.2(c) E-2 ALL DISTRICTS M E M 0 R A N D U M Jul~ 2, 1974 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA '· O. BOX 1127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92709 (714) S-40-2910 (714) 962-2411 SUBJECT: In-Plant Pipe Inspection Services for the Construction of Sewer Pipe Fiscal Year 1974-75 The Sanitation Districts have, for several years, employed the services of outside testing laboratories for the purpose of providing in-plant pipe inspection for all District trunk sewer faci 1i tics and for those, as required, for treatment facility projects. The retention of outside consulting services is, in my opinion, in the best interest of the Districts because of fluctuations in services required and inequities which would be created if qualified personnel were incorporated in the Districts' permanent ·staff. During the past fiscal year, the combined Districts' have expended $47,887.00 for in-plant pipe line inspection. The services have been performed by Testing Engineers, Inc. of Santa Fe Springs. I have solicited proposals from five qualified .testing laboratories and received proposals from two firms interested in providing the necessary services for the 1974-75 fiscal year. These propcsals, as subcittcd, were predicated· upon the services required for the proposed schedule of work for this fiscal year (see copy attached). It is estimated, based on prior services provided, that the in-plant pipe inspection services for the ensuing year will be approximately $66,000.00 for all projects required for the combined Distric~s and the Joint Works. In careful review of the two proposals submitted and the qualifications thereof, it is my rccor.imendation that the Sanitation Districts e~ploy Testing Engineers, Inc. to perform all in-plant pipe inspection as required at the fee schedule as stipulated in their proposal. The testing services provided by this· firm du=ing the past fiscal year have been very satisfactory and the charge for qualified inspectors is $2.00 per hour less than the rate quoted in the other proposal. CONTRACT NO. 3-18 3-20-1 3-20-2 3-20-3 2-14-2 2-14-3 2-18 AGENDA ITEM #12(c) PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF ~ORK IN-PLA.\'T PIPE INSPECTION 1974-75 FISCAL YEAR PIPE SIZE 63" 96" 66" 72" 72" 78" 63" 48" 51" 66" 60" 51" 39" E-3 LINEAR FEET 2,400 3,000 18,400 8,250 8,000 3,000 3,000 6,000 1,000 2,670 1,320 2,430 600 ALL DISTRJ.C'I1S CUUi~-l )' ~i\:~ I T1\T Io:~ JH !>Tl: l l:T!j 01· {}}:.1\:;L.J~ LUIJ;, ! _l P. 0, Box 3127 -10;).l·l Elli:; ,\v(·11uc Fount a in Va 11 c y, Ca 1 if or n i a ~} Z 7 0 8 c. 0. :.:o. :o:\Tl~CTOil:Donov~n Construction Co. of Minnesota ----------~--------DJ\ TE July 10, 1974 101~:46 MGD Activated Sludge Plant at Reclamation Plant No. 1 -Job No. Pl-16 Arilount of this Ch:inl!c Or<lcr (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 0.00 ~ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the :ontr3ct ~rntl/or contract ,.;ark arc hereby authori:.cc.l :in<l as .c01:ipcnsation th c r c r 0 r , t ;lC f 0110 wing a cl di ti 0 n s t 0 0 r d c <l u c ti 0 n s fr 0 m th C' c 0 n tract pr i cc arc llcrcb)· approvctl. :· . Incorporation of Federal Wage Requirements #AQ-1094 dated March 22, 1974 per Parf. B Approval Letter dated June 13, 1974 from the State Water Resources Control Board. .. Original Contract Price $ 29,876,000.00 Hoard authorization date: July 10, 1974 By--------------~~------~-------C on s ult 1ng Engineer By------------------------~-:----:-----C on tract or AGENDA ITEM #12(d) Prev. Auth. Changes $ ____ 0_. _00 __ This Change (ADD)(DEDUCT) $ 0.00 ----~~-----~-- A~cndcd Contract Price s 29,876,000.00 -F- ApprovcJ: COU:\TY SANITATIO:J DISTRICTS of Orange County, ·California By ____________________ _,_ __ _,_-.-~--~ .Clu el Ln g l lle c ALL DIS'TRICTS RESOLUTION NO. 74-91 ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO GUIDELINES IMPLEMENTING THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT OF 1970, AS AMENDED A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE DISTRICTS' GUIDELINES IMPLEMENTING THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT OF 1970, AS AMENDED * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, on the 14th day of March, 1973, pursuant to Resolution No. 73-26, the Boards did adopt.Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act, which Guidelines were based upon State Environmental Guidelines promulgated by the Secretary of Resources; and, WHEREAS, on March 22, 1974, the State Environmental Guidelines .._,, were amended to implement an amendment made to the California Environ- mental Quality Act of 1970, effective March 4, 1974; and, WHEREAS, Public Resources Code Section 21082 requires that local environmental procedures shall be consistent with State Environmental Guidelines. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY DETERMINED AND ORDERED: That Amendment.No. 2 to the Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Amended, is hereby adopted by these Boards as an amendment to the environmental guidelines of these Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #12(e) -G-ALL DISTRICTS ~UUn l I J.'\.l l 1 i\ l l U~" JJ l ~> i I~ J l. I~ lll' UJ:;\;,l1L LUU.~! J P. O •. Box 8127 -1013·l•l Elli~ ,\venue Fountain Valley, California ~J2708 CIIA:--1GE OIU>i:R . c. 0. :-:o. 3 :o:\TP~CTOil: Hemisphere Constructors. Inc. ~--~--~~~----~~ D/\TE July 3, 1974 roll: Digestcrs "N" and "0" at Plant No. 2 -Job No. P2-21 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (Xi.Olxt'iax) $ 860.36 , In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the :onrtact an<l/or contract \·:ark arc hereby authorized anc.l as cor:1pcnsation :hcircfor, the following additions to or dcc.luctions from tl1c contract price arc icrc by a pprovc<l. • .. . Reference: Contractor's letters dated December"~6, 1973; Add: March 22, 1974 and May 3, 1974. Districts' letters dated December 31, 1973; January 23, 1974 and May 1, 1974. Revise vent in compressor building ADD Install paving by Pflanz Headworks ADD TOTAL ADD ~ Extension of Contract Time The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of time for delayed delivery of equipment TOTAL TIME EXi:ENSION Summary of Contract Time Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Total Time Extension · Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date .. -· ..... : Original Contract Price Prev. Au th. Changes $254.06 606.30 $860.36 117 Calendar Days 117 Calendar Days January 25, 1973 300 Calendar Days ·November 21, 1973 252 Calendar Days 552 Calendar Days July 31, 1974 $ 1,068,413.00 $ 8,101.62 This Change (ADD) [DWN~) $ 860.36 Amended Contract Price s 1,077,374.98 Hoard authorization date:. July 10, 1974 By ______________ -r-----.~----~--- C ons ul ting Eng i1"iCC'r By----------------------,~~----~~ Contractor AGENDA ITEM #1£igj_ -H- Approved: COU!\TY SJ\NITATIO?~ DISTRICTS of Orange County, California ~ By ____________________ _....__,--.---.--~ .Ch1cT Enr.1nc:c ALL DISTRICTS ' PROGRESS REPORT TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE . FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 I-8-3 -INFLUENT METERING AND DIVERSION STRUCTURE -($1,503,679.00) INFLUENT CHA.~NEL: Complete INFLUENT PIPING: Euclid and Sunflower Trunk bypasses in service. Completed junction structures on Newhope-Placentia and District No. 1 trunk lines. Interplant Influent Interceptor, Ellis Force Main, Newhope-Placentia, and Sunflower Trunks have been connected to structure. METERING A.~D DIVERSION STRUCTIJRE: Gates to be installed this month. Electrical wiring continuing. Contract approximately 91 percent complete to date:. J-13 -SHOPS AND WAREHOUSE FACILITIES -($1,061,989)' SHOP A: Building essentially completed. Correcting punch list items. SHOP B: Compiling punch list. Equipment in this building to be tested. WAREHOUSE: Change order work to comply with buil~ing code requirements to be completed this month. SITE: Paving, curbs, gutters and fence compl.ete. Irrigation system installed. Contract approximately 99 percent complete to date. Pl-16 -46 MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 -($29,876,000) PILING: Contractor submitted piling shop drawings. . PIPING: Contractor submitting· piping shop drawings and V.C.P. is on site. EARTHWORK: Preliminary earthwork complete. Road from Garfield removed. First month of contract. P2-20 -POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT PLANT NO. 2 -($158,294) No further onsite work is expected until sufficient equipment has been delivered to complete peripheral lighting and control installations. Unit substation delivery not expected before July. Contract approximately 58 percent complete to date. AGENDA ITEM #12(j) I-1 ALL DISTRICTS Progress Report Treatment Plant Projects Page Two P2-21 -DIGESTERS "N" AND "0" AT PLANT NO. 2 -($1,076,514) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 1084.C ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71.C) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 DIGESTERS "N" AND "O": Digesters have been fille_d with water for testing. DIGESTER CONTROL BUILDING: Installing piping, electrical and instrumentation. Steam and hot water pipes being insulated. TUNNELS: Painting of piping complete. DIGESTER GAS COMPRESSORS: Compressors in service and room has been painted. STORM WATER PUMP STATION: Structurally complete. ·Having difficulty with pump delivery. Contract approximately 98 percent complete to date • .._..,TREATMENT PLANT WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During June Total Work Under Design DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During June Total Work Under Design $33,676,476 3,425,335 110,167 800,000 $23,447,279 17,647,324 873,451 19,809,040 TOTAL A.~IOUNT UNDER CONTRACT & DESIGN July 3, 1974 AGENDA ITEM #12(j) I-2 $33,676,476 800,000 $23,447,279 19,809,040. $77,732,795 ALL DISTR!CTS ~VUH 1 l vJ\d 1 l /\ l l v.1 111.> l h J \, l J \Jj" \JI .J\o\\.JI. ~VV•' I I P. o. Box 8127 -10o·l 1l Elli!,; AvC'nuc Fountain Valley, California 92708 CJIA~GE OIU>~R c.o. :\0. 14 :o:~TRACTOR: Sully-Miller Contracting Company DATE ___ J_u_l_y_3-.~1-9-74 ______ __ JOB:Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Ave., Contract No. 2-14-1 Amount of this Change Order ~Xln) (DEDUCT) $ 14,970.00 In accord an cc with contract p r·o vis ions , th c f o 11 owing cha n g cs in the :'O 1) tract an <l Io r contra c t work arc h c r c by author i : c c.l an c.l as co 1:-t pc n sat ion '-"" :hcrcfor, the following additions to or deductions from thq contract price arc tcrcby approvc<l. • .. ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES "Add: Change Est'd Quant. Item No. Unit From To 49 L.F. Deduct: 40 V.F. 41 V.F. 44 V.F. 47 Each . 51 Each 54 . 254 101 15 1 6 59 222.6 89.5 13.2 0 5 Difference· S @ $16.00/L.F. Total Add: 31.4 @ $250.00/V.F. 11.5 @ $280.00}V.F. 1.8 @ $300.00/V.F. 1 @ $3,000.00/Each 1 @ $440.00/Each Total Deduct: TOTAL DEDUCT .· $ 80.00 $7,850.00 3-, 220. 00 540.00 3,000.00 440.00 Original Contract Price Prcv. Auth. Changes $ ·80.00 15,050.00 $14,970.00 $ 6,274,608.40 $ 1,560,118.32 This Change 0\'ffJ) (DEDUCT) $ ------14,970.00 ~mended Contra~t Price '-" s 7,819,756.72 Board authorization date:. July 10, 1974 ApprovcJ: COUt\TY SJ\NITATIO!~ DISTRICTS of 0 rang c County , .Ca 1 i for n i a • By------------~----~----....----~~ Consulting Engineer By--------------------..,.-:-~~=-=-::~ Contractor By ____________________ ~,__,--r--__ ~ .ClncT Enr,1ncc AGENDA ITEM #12(1) ·-J- w V VI' ' I '-1 J \ • t ' I I\ l l \.J •' JI J. "J l I ' J \ • J ~ \ 11 V i .J \. t U J • ~ V v a 1 & & P. O. Box 8127 · -100·l'l Elli~ ,\vC'nuc Fountain Valley, Ca.lifornia 92708 CllA:-JGE OlU>i: R c. 0. :w. 15 DATE -J.;;..;;u ..... 1_y_3-.-l 9_7_4_ . :·o:~·t11AC:t 0 R: _s_u_l_I .... r_-~_·11_· l_l_e_r_Co_n_t_r_a_· c_t_i n....lg""--C_o_m __ p_a n_..y'------ JOB:Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Ave., Contract No. 2-14.-1 Amount of this Change Order (AD\X) ~Mmx:t~ $ 0.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the ::'0~3ct an<l/or contract work arc hereby authori:c<l ant! as c01:tpcnsation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from t11c contract price arc ncrcby approved. • .. Extension of Contract Time The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of time due to inclement we·ather TOTAL TIME EXTENSION Summary of Contract Time .. Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Or.iginal Completion Date Total Extension of Contract Time Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date .. Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes 18 Calendar Days 18 Calendar Days September 21, 1972 630 Calendar Days June 12, 1974 · 18 Calendar Days 648 C~lendar Days June. 30, 1974 $6,274,608.40 $1,545,148.32 This Change (\~) ~~mm:i) $ ------~~--~--- 0.00 Board authorization date: July 10, 1974 By---------------------~-------r-r---------Cons ult 1 ng Engineer By ____________________ __,~-:----~~ Contractor AGENDA ITEM #12(1) Amended Contract Price s1,s19,7s6.12 .-K- Approved: COUNTY SANITATim~ DISTRICTS of Orange County, California ~ By--------------------------~ .ClucT tnr, 1ncc DISTRICT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 74-93-2 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-14-1 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-14-1 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Sully-Miller Contracting Company, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for the SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR FROM RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 TO KATELLA AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-1, on the 30th of June, 1974; and, Section 2. That by letter, Lowry & Associates, District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 21st day of September, 1972; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Sully-Miller Contracting Company setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of said Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, -is hereby approved; and,~ Section 7, That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a reGular meeting held July 10, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #12(m) -L-DISTRICT 2 w V V i\ ! l v J \ d .1 l J \ 1 l \.) , 'I J J .1 ") j I , J \ , J ..) \ I l" \J i • .J \ • t ~ Jl • \..., V U • \ ' 1. P. O. Box 8127 -l08-l 1l Elli!.i .\vc-nuc Fountain Valley, California 92708 CIIJ\~GE OlWER Kasler Corporation & :O~\TRACTOR: L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc., A Joint Venture c.o. :\0. 1 --..:.---------~~----~ DATE · July 3. 1974 rOB:~Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer from Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-2 Amount of this Change Order ~!Vn) ~1Nxtn:OO) $ 0.00 , ~ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the :ontract an<l/or contract work arc hereby nuthorizc<l anc.l as cor:1pensation :hercfor, the following additions to or dc<luctions from the contract price arc iercby approvc<l. The Contractor shall be allowed as an· alternate method to construct pilot tunnels, place a concrete pad with rails.-in the tunnel and then j~ck the reinforced concrete sewer pipe along the concrete pad. This method is in lieu of jacking various diameter casings in the areas designated on t-Oe plans then jacking the reinforced concrete pipe into the casings. All jacked pipe shall be p er i p h er a 11 y gr o u t e d • A 11 work w i 11 b e a cc om p 1 i s·h e d with the sanction of any other agency involved. Payment will be made on the basis of the jacked casing uni~ price plus the jacked pipe unit price as stated in the Contract and at no additional cost to the District. This Change ln Method.does not apply to the tunnel under the Riverside Freeway or the casing under the Southern Pacific Railroad track.?_~-----· ____ ·-. _____ . __ ~ext ens ion·s -of time wi 11 be granted for the change in the method of construction as described in this Change Order. Original Contract Price $3,545,635.33 Prev. Auth. Changes $ _________ o_._o_o~~ This Change Q\\~) (DJIDUtxlq $ ----------~--~~ o.oo Amended Contract Price $3,545,635.33 Hoard authorization date:. July 10, 1974 Approved: By ______________ ~---y--.---~-----~ Consulting Engineer By--------------------~~-:-~-:--~ Contractor AGENDA ITEM #12(n) . -M- COU!\TY SJ\NITATim~ DISTRICTS of Orange County, -California ~ By _________________________ __..--~.--~ .chic-I Eng in cc DISTRICT 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA .......... P.O. BOX 8127 1084'4' ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: 2-14-1 MEMORANDUM July 3, 1974 Fred A. Harper, General Manager Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contracts Nos. 2-14-1 & 2-14-2 (714) 5-40-2910 (71-') 962-2-411 Work on this project complete and final inspection to be scheduled for early next week. ~ 2-14-2 Work continues for the most part on schedule. The Contractor did not start work on Grove Street due to the pending strike. No work will be done at· this location "-11 until it can be accomplished without any shutdowns or delays. The 78" pipe is complete through the encasement across the river to the south portal of the tunnel under the Riverside Freeway. Currently work is being done in the vicinity of Ball Road. Work at the tunnel under the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks north of Katella is held up due to a shortage of tunnel liner plate. REL: BEW: ss .. AGENDA ITEM #12(0) N-1 DISTRICT 2 :x::. 0 ( ( t:i::J z t:J ::r> H 1-3 t:i::J ~ ::;t: I-' (\.) ........... 0 ...._ CON1t<.AC1 ~ '2-14-1 ~ S~NTA ANA RlVfR lNi~CC'PTO~· ----...... _ CDMPlJ:\f 00000 -roe~ CON51Rucrro ~UUn l I 0.:\.4ll1\' 1 u ... JJ 1 :> j t~ j \. J ::> u1· lJ!'..i\ • .i. .. 1J: \..UU., I I P. O. Box 3127 -lOd·l•l Ell i!.j ,\vc·nuc Fountain Valley, California 92708 CJIA>:GE OlU>ER c.o·. :\o. 3 ---~~~~~----~--~ DATE July 3. 1974 A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. :o:\Tl~CTOR: and N. M. Saliba Company, a Joint Venture JOll: Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18 Amount of this Change Order µ!MX) (OOM~) $ o.oo In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in th~ c:'ou tract an<l/ or contract work a re here by author i z c<l and as co::tpcnsa t ion therefor, the following· additions to or de<luctions from the contract price arc hereby approve<.!. • .. Reference: Contractor's letter to District dated June 27, 1974 Extension of Contract Time The Contractor is hereby granted an extensi-0n of time for lost ·time due to a strike of the pipe company truck drivers Summary of Contract Time Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Previous Time Extension Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date TOTAL TIME EXTENSION .· 39 Calendar Days 39 Calendar Days June 1, 1973 360 Calendar Days May 27, 1974 89 Calendar Days 128 Calendar Days 488 Calendar Days October 2, 1974 Original Contract Price $ 4 J 334 '412. 00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 ------- This Change ~~~~~ nu::num~ $ ___ o_.o_o_· .....,;- Amended Contra~t Piice s 4,334,412.00 Hoard authorization date: July 10, 1974 Approvc<l: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By------------~--·---..-.-----~---~~ Consulting Engineer By--------------------~-:-~~~ Contractor By_·-------------------------------~ .ClncJ Ln~ inct. AGENDA ITEM #12(0) ·-O-DISTRICT ~ RESOLUTION NO. 74-94-3 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF STANTON TO INCORPORATE CITY STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS INTO CONTRACT FOR KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 5 & 6 2 CONTRACT NO. 3-20-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF STANTON TO INCORPORATE CONSTRUCTION OF CITY STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS INTO CONTRACT FOR KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 5 & 6, CONTRACT NO. 3-20-1 * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the City of Stanton has requested that County Sanitation District No. 3 enter into an agreement for the joint construction of sewer and storm drain facilities and street improvements in Knott Avenue from the southerly city limits to the northerly city limits; and WHEREAS, it appears that substantial cost savings can be ·realized by the joint construction of proposed sewer facilities of County Sanitation District No. 3 and proposed storm drain facilities and street improvements of the City of Stanton; and, WHEREAS, the City has offered to reimburse County Sanitation District No. 3 for the City's proportionate share of all costs of the joint construction project; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY DETERMINED AND ORDERED: Section 1. That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 does hereby approve that certain agreement, dated July 10, 1974, between County Sanitation District No. 3 and the City of Stanton to incorporate the City's proposed storm drain facilities and street ~mprovements in Knott Avenue from the southerly city limits to the northerly city limits of the City of Stanton into the District's proposed Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 & 6, Contract No. 3-20-1, and providing for reimbursement of City's cost to the District; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement, in form approved by the General Counsel, on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #12(q) -P-DISTRICT 3 f TO: FROM: SUBJECT: M E M 0 R A N D U M July 3, 1974 Fred A. Harper, General Manager Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer Knott Interceptor, Contract No. 3-18 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108'4.tf ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71'4) 540-2910 (71.tf) 962-2'4 I l ~ Work has proceeded to 1600 feet north of Bolsa on Hoover. Also completed is the section from the north end of the pipe laid under Contract 3-18-1 through the tunnel at Hazard. Grouting within the tunnel at Hazard is now taking place. The Laborers and Carpenters are due to go on strike this week. This will probably shut the job done. REL:BEW:ss AGENDA ITEM #12(r) Q-1 DISTRICT 3 () () }':)o o J> "11 ~ z -t ~ -< 60LD~N CC"CU~wooo ST. ST. wVUH' I ~J\., l l J\ l 1 u.~ JJ l :, 1 1~ J l. J :J Ul' U!'.J\ .• lJJ: LUU., J I P. O. Box 8127 -lOi.->·l 1l Elli~ ,\vC'nuc Fountain Valley, California ~2708 CIIA:lGE OIWER c. 0. :.:o. 1 DATE -J-u~l-y---3-.~1-9_7_4--~-:o:,TRACTOR: Rewes-Schock, JV, A Joint Venture roll: Mmhole Replacement and Repair, Contract No. 5-14R-3 Amount of this ChJ.ngc Order ~19 ~JJ>mIK}: $.0.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the'-"' :'oi:itrac t anu/ or contract \·:ork arc hereby authori z c<l an<l as co1:ipcnsa t ion ;hcrcfor, the following· additions to or dc<luctions from tl1c contract price arc lcrcbr approved. • .. Change in standard specifications provisions - fire insurance not applicable to ·this _project. $0.00 .· Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes $24,079.ZQ $ 0.00 This Change ~ ~tn~ $ 0. 00 .._ __, ---------·~~-~wrJ'-· Amended Contract Price 524,079.29 ---- Hoard authorization date: July 10, 1974 Approved: COU!,iTY SANITATimJ Ill STRIC:'S of Orange County, California " By ____________ -,:~---~---,.--~~~ Consulting Engineer By---------------------,-r-=-~~~ Contractor By ----------------------.-c-h~1-c_T...._L~r-1r,_1_11 AGENDA ITEM #12(s) .-R-DISTRICT 5 ,....""'_ ..... ".,.,.& ... ,,.£'-J•• .,£., ............ ._J '"' ,,, ... , •• "' •• '4'-'-•ll•• P. O. Box 8127 -lOo·l'l Elli~ ,\venue Fountain Valley, California ~2708 CJIA~GE OlW~R C. 0. i\O. Kordick and Soni Inc. --=---------DATE July 3, 1974 JOll: Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension, Contract No. 11-12 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) CfiL'i}{ID!{) $5,015.00 . In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the :bnYract a.nu/or contract l·:ork arc hereby authorized an<l as co1:ipcnsation :hcrcfor, the following a<lditions to or deductions from the. contract price arc lCrcby approvc<l. • .. . Add: Item No. 6 7 Adjustment of Quantities Change Est'd Quant. Unit From To V.F. V. R. 10 80 23 100 Board uuthorization date:. July 10, 1974 By------------------------~----r--------Cons ult 1ng Engineer By-----------------------,~-:-~~~ Contractor AGENDA ITEM #12(u) 13 @ $1 7 5 . 0 0 /V .. p • 20 @ $137.00/V.F. TOTAL ADD : Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes $2,275.00 2,740.00 $5,015.00 $419,000.SO $ S,666.88 This Chanec (ADD) C'DOO{~) $ 5, 015. O O Amended Contr~ct Price s 429,682.38 I -S- Approved: COUI\TY Si\NITATimJ DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By _________________________ ..,_~~---~- ,C ln cT. Lnr,1ncc DISTRH~rr 11 RESOLUTION NO. 74-95-11 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 11-12 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 11-12 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Kordick and Son, Inc., has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for SLATER AVENUE TRUNK SEWER EXTENSION, CONTRACT NO. 11-12, on the 30th of June, 1974; and, Section 2. That by letter, Keith & Associates, District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension, Contract No. 11-12, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 24th day of January, 1974; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute~a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Kordick and Son, Inc. setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of said Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension, Contract No. 11-12, is hereby approved; and, Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #12(v) -T-DISTRICT 11 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: M E M 0 R A N D U M County Sanitation Districts of Orange County C. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel June 27, 1974 Conflict of Interests The Act under which a local district, such as a County Sanitation District, may enact guidelines to implement the Governmental Conflict of Interests Act has been declared constitutional by the California Supreme Court. This Act has also been repealed as of January 7, 1975 by the adoption of Proposition 9, an initiative known as the "Political Reform Act of 1974". The Districts are subject to the existing Governmental Conflict of Interests Ac.t, hereinafter called "GCIA", until January 7, 1975. Under this Act the Districts may adopt guide- lines. By adopting guidelines any "public official" who is sued for a violation of the GCIA will be exerr.pt from the civil penalties described in Government Code §3751 and §3753 if the official attempts in good faith to comply with the guidelines if adopted. The civil penalties from which the public official may become exempt are: §3751: "(c) If it is determined that a violation of Section 3625 has occurred, and if the public official who committed the violation realized an economic benefit as a result of the action or decision, the court may impose a penalty against the public official of up to three times the value of the benefit. "(d) If it is determined that an interest which should have been disclosed in the report required by Section 3700 was omitted, the court may impose a penalty of up to three times the value of the omitted interest." §3753: "A violation of any provision of this division shall be groundsfor forfeiture of office as AGENDA ITEM #14(a) U-1 ALL DISTRICTS provided in Section 1700 of the Government Code and for disqualification from holding public off ice as provided in Section 1021 of the Government Code." If guidelines are adopted, the Act does not require that public officials of local agencies, such as County Sanita- tions Districts, need file a disclosure of interests; however, such disclosure may be made a requirement of local guidelines. If no disclosure is required under local guidelines, there can be no mistake in failing to list an interest for which the penalty set forth in §375l(d) is provided. In considering this matter, an analysis of the risks as "public officials" of a County Sanitation District should be made: 1. A County Sanitation District is not primarily a governing body and does not concern itself primarily with legislation. The only ordinances and resolutions adopted have to do with the regulation and use of sewerage facilities. 2. During the period when these guidelines can be effective {July 10, 1974 to January 7, 1975) little, if any, "legislation" of the type a County Sanitation District can en- act is contemplated. 3. Any public official of a County Sanitation District can easily spot any potential or actµal conflict of interest arid disclosure of such interest at a meeting or relative to the matter pending is not difficult. In other words, "conflict of interest" is not difficult to recognize _by any individual acting in good faith. 4. The elections affecting public officials of a County Sanitation District are conducted by other govern- mental agencies whose disclosure requirements are set forth in the Act and are different from those of a County Sanitation District. In summary, actual exposure seems remote during the next 4 1/2 months. ·The public right to know about a candidate's financial interests will in no way be reduced or hampered if no County-Sanitation District guidelines or disclosure require- ments are adopted. The GCIA defines the term "public official" as follows: "any elective or appointive officer of· any public agency". Under previously adopted guidelines, which have been suspended, a determination was made and these officials were listed, however, the definition of a public officer as construed -2- AGENDA ITEM #14(a) U-2 ALL DISTRICTS by the courts leaves some doubt as to whether or not the prior listing in our resolutions did not go beyond the intent ~-of the Act. In the case of Coulter vs Pool (1921) 187·C 181, the Court said a public officer, as distinguished from a public employee, is that "a public duty is delegated and en- trusted to him as agent, the performan~e of which is an exercise of a part of the governmental functions of the particular political unit of which he, as agent, is acting." Characteristics of a public official are a fixed tenure of position, exaction of a public oath of office, an official bond (sometimes), liability to be called to account as a public offender for misfeasance or nonfeasance of office. The case of Spreckles vs Graham (1924)· 194 C 516 stated that there were two elements universally regarded as. essential to the definition of what a public official was. First, a tenure of office which is.not transient, occasional or incidental. The office is an entity for which incumbents succeed each other and the off ice does not cease to exist with the termination of incumbency. Second, the delegation of some portion of the chosen functions of government. After January 7, 1975 under the Political Reform Act of 1974, the Districts will be required to adopt and promulgate a conflict of interests code, however, i~ provides that no conflict of interests code shall be effective until it has been approved by the code reviewing board. In this case, that would be the Board of Supervisors. Each agency shall submit a proposed conflict of interests.code by the deadline established for the agency by the Supervisors. The deadline for any agency in existence on April 1, 1975 shall not be earlier than April 1, 1976. It, therefore, appears that although it will be an actionable offense for any public official to participate in making or in any way attempt to use his official position to influence a governmental decision in which he knows or has reason to know he has a financial interest, there will be no special conflict of interest code for the Sanitation Districts until some time after April 1, 1976. "Public official 11 , as defined in the Political Reform Act of 1974 is as follows Government Code §8204. "Agency official 11 means any member, officer, employee or consultant of any state agency who as a part of his official responsibilities participates in any administrative action in any other than purely clerical, secretarial or ministerial capacity. In view of the foregoing, my recommendations are: -3- AGENDA ITEM #14(a) U-3 ALL DISTRIC 1I1S (1) That you do not adopt any guidelines during the interim 4 1/2 month period. (2) That you adopt the guidelines proposed without the inclusion of the "disclosure" requirements. · CAN:ac AGENDA ITEM #14(a) Respectfully submitted, L~~~ c. Arthur Nissen, General Counsel -4- ALL DISTRICTS ' . (PASJED BY DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3 & 11 ONLY) RESOLUTION NO. 74-52 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COU!JTY S:\iJ ri,\ri'ION Dl.:'.THICTS i·WS. 1, 2, 3, AND 11 OF OHi\UGE COUN11 Y ADOP':lING GUIDELINES FOR THE Il:IPLEf·lEr,:TATION OF THE GOVERNMENTAL CONFLIC?S OF INTEREST ACT * * * * * * * * * * * BE IT RESOLVED by the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 11 of Orange County, California: SECTION 1. PURPOSE AND EFFECT Pursuant to Section 3626 of the Government Code (all section references herein are to the Government Code unless otherwise specified), the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 11 of Orange County, California hereby adopt the following guidelines for their public officials in determining whether they have an economic interest or interests which are in substantial conflict with their official duties and powers und~r Subdivision (a) of Section 3625 and in determining whether they have an economic interest in matters for purposes of Subdivision (b) of Section 3625. Nothing contained in this resolution is intended to modify or abridge the provisions of the Governmental Conflicts of In~erest Act (Section 3600 et seq.'), Sectionsl090-1097; or any other provisions of law pertaining to conflicts of interest. This resolution shall be interpreted in a manner consistent therewith. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed adopted pursuant to or in implementation of Section 3603 or Section 3704. SECTION 2. DESIGNATION OF OFFICIALS The "public officials," "officials," and "elective and appointive officers" subject to the provisions of Section 3625 are: AGENDA ITEM #14(c) V-1 EACH DISTLICT 1. Board of Directors 2. General Mana~er 3. Chief Engineer 4. Secretary 5. County Auditor acting as ex officio Auditor of the Districts 6. Director of Finance of the J.A.O. 7. General Counsel SECTION 3. SUBSTANTIAL CONFLICT Ao An official shall not be deemded to have an economic interest in substantial conflict with the proper exercise of an official's duties within the meaning of Government Code Section 3625(a) if he has only a "remote economic in.terest" and if the fact of such interest is disclosed to the body or Board of the District and noted ·in its official records, and the official in no way attempts to influence any other public official of the District with respect to any matter concerning such remote economic interest. As used in this section, the term "remote economic interest" means: 1. TQat of a non-salaried member or officer of a non-profit corporation; 2. That of a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee or holder of any position of management in any business entity contracting with the District if such business entity has ten or more other employees and if the officer was an employee or agent of said entity for at least three years prior to his initially accepting his office. For purposes of this subsection, time of employment with the business entity by the officer shall be counted in computing such three-year period even though such entity has been converted from one form of business organization to a different form of business organization within three years of the initial taking of office by such officer. Time of employment in such case shall be counted only if, after the transfer or change in organization, the real or ultimate ownership for the contracting party is the same or substantially similar to AGENDA ITEM #14(c) V-2 EACH DIS'I'RICT that which existed before such transfer or change in organization. For the purposes of this subsection, stockholders, bondholders, partners, or other persons holding an ·interest in the business entity are regarded as having the "real or ultimate ownership" of such entity. 3. That of a parent in the earnings of his minor child for personal services; 4. That of a landlord or tenant of a business entity contracting with the District; 5. That of an attorney of a business entity contracting with the District; 6. That of a supplier of goods or services to the District when such goods or services have been supplied to the District by such officer for at least five years prior to his election or appointment to office; 7. That of a person subject to the provisions of Government Code Section 1090 in any contract or agreement entered into pursuant to the provisions of the California Land Conservation Act of 1965; 8. That of an officer, director, or employee of a bank, bank holding company, or savings and loan association with which the -District has the relationship of borrower or deposit~r, debtor or creditor; 9. That of a shareholder of a corporation contracting with the District if less than 3% of the shares of such corporation are owned by such officer and total annual income to the officer from dividends, including the value of stock dividends from the corporation, does not exceed 5% of ttie officer's total annual income, and any other payments mad~ to him by the corporation do not exceed 5% of his total annual income. B. An economic interest in substantial conflict with the proper exercise of an official's duties within the meaning of Section 3625(a) shall not be deemed to exist unless the_ official would be required to disqualify himself under Section 3625(b) on a continuous and regular basis from activities and actions which AGENDA ITEM #14(c) V-3 EACH DISTRICT constitute a major and significant portion of his official dutie3 and thereby impair his ability to function effectively arid fulfill duties of his office. SECTION 4. MATERIAL ECONOMIC EFFECT An action or decision shall not be deemed to have a material effect on an economic interest unless the official has reason to believe that, by reason of the action or decision, an investment, or interest in real property may increase or decrease in value, other than negligibly, or a business entity from which the official derives income or in which he holds a position of employment or management will gain or lose monetarily, other than negligihly. A change of less than 1% shall be deemed negligible. SECTION 5. MINISTERIAL AND CLERICAL DUTIES Section 3625(b) shall apply only to actions which involve discretion or judgment. It does not apply to actions which are solely ministerial or clerical. SECTIO~ 6. PARTICIPATION A. The t~rms "participate" and "attempt .to influence" as used in Section 3625(b) shall be deemed to include but not be limited to participation in deliberations or debate, or voting on the issue, and the following actions when related to the merits.of the issue to be decided on or acted upon: 1. Preparation of oral or written reports. 2. Rendition of oral or written advice. 3. Testimony before a public agency. 4. Discussion with any officials authorized to decide or assist other public officials to decide the matter. 5. Submission of letters or other documents to any official authorized to decide or assist other public officials to decide the matter. 6. Issuance or denial of an official approval. AGENDA ITEM #14(c) V-4 EACH DISTRICT B. Nothin~ contained herein or in Section 3625 shall abrid~e the right of any citizen, whether or not a public official, .to submit information or express views on the same basis as any other private citizen, provided such is done in public and the ·person indicates he is acting in a private capacity. C. An official directly involved in a matter, .whether as a party, or applicant, or otherwise may, in his private capacity, provide whatever information is necessary and perform any other steps which are required of other citizens in the same situation, individually or by counsel. He may not, _however, discuss the matter privately with officials who must decide the matter. SECTION 7. NECESSITY A. An official shall not be subjept to Section 3625(b) with respect to any matter which cannot be legally acted upon or decided without his participation. B. Section 3625(b) shall not apply where: 1. A statutory quorum cannot be achieved by continuance or within legally mandated time limits; 2. More than a simple majority vote is required to take a proposed action, and the number of officials entitled to vote is less than the number required; or 3. The official is, by law, the sole officer who can perform the action or make the decision. C. In cases where subsections (b) (1) or (b) (2) apply, all otherwise qualified officials shall be entitled to participate. D. In all cases involving exemptions hereunder, the officials shall comply with Section 3625(d). SECTION 8. DISQUALIFICATION An official who refrains from acting in accordance with Section 3625(b) should publicly announce such abstension but need not declare the nature of the interest whic~ disqualifies such official. AGENDA ITEM #14(c) V-5 EACH DISTRICT SECTION 9. INTERPRETATION Any official who ts unsure of his duties under Section 3625 should secure a written opinion from counsel. When said opinion is complied with in the good faith belief that it is consistent with those provisions, said action shall be deemed in compliance with these guidelines, and such official shall be exempt from the civil penalties in Section 3751 and the sanctions in Section 3753. SECTION 10. DISCLOSURE Each of the public officials named in Section 2 above shall, during the month of April in each year and within thirty (30) days after ceasing to hold public office, file verified statements containing the information described in Government Code Section 3700(b) with the Clerk of the County of Orange. It is the intent of this section to make the provisions of Chapter 4 of Division 4.5 of Title 1 of the Government Code applicable to the public officials of this District. SECTION 11. LIMITATIONS ON ACTIONS No action shall be brought pursuant to Section 3751 of the Government Code A. To restrain the execution of or to set aside as void any decision, contract, order, permit, resolution or other official action unless-the complaint or petition has been filed and served on the Secretary of the District within thirty (30) days following the decision, contract, order, permit,_ ' resolution or other official action; B. To enjoin an official from violating or to compel an official to comply with the provision of Division 4.5 of Title 1 of the Government Code or of this resolution, unless the complaint or petition has been filed and served within 180 days after the violation of Section 3625 of the Government Code occurred. AGENDA ITEM #14(c) V-6 EACH DISTRICT SECTION 12. SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution is for any reason held by a court of competent Jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the. validity of the remaining portions of this resolution. The Board of Directors hereby declares that it would have passed this resolution and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections,subsections, sentences, clause or phrase be declared invalid. SECTION 13, EFFECTIVE DATE This resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 13, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #14(c) V-7 EACH DISTRICT ~ t'A~~t.U tH lJl.~'l'li.lt.;'1':.::i ~, 0 & ( UNLY} RESOLUTION NO. 74-53 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITA'J'ION DISTRICTS NOS. 5, 6, AND 7 OP o;\:LGS cuu:,i'IY J\CIJPTING GUIDELINES f'OR THE H1PLEViErrrATION OF THE GOVERNME1~TAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST ACT • * • * * * * * * * BE IT RESOLVED by the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5, 6, and 7 of Orange County, California: SECTION 1. PURPOSE AND EFFECT Pursuant to Section 3626 of the Government Code (all section references herein are to the Government· Code unless otherwise specified), the Boards of Directors of the County San~tation . . Districts Nos. 5, 6, and 7 of Orange County, California hereby adopt the following guidelines for their public officials in deter- mining whether they have an economic interest or interests which are in substantial conflict with their official duties and powers under Subdivision (a) of Section 3625 and in determining whether they have an economic interest in matters for purposes of Subdivision (b) of Section 3625. Nothing contained in this resolution is intended to modify or abridge the provisions of the Governmental Conflicts of Interest Act (Section 3600 et seq.), Sectionsl090-1097; or any other provisions of law pertaining to conflicts of interest. This resolution shall be interpreted in a manner consistent therewith. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed adopted pursuant to or in implementation of Section 3603 or Section 3704. SECTION 2. DESIGNATION OF OFFICIALS The "public officials," "officials," and "elective and appointive officers" subject to the provisions· of Section 3625 are: AGENDA ITEM #14(c) ·w-1 EACH DISTRICT 1. Board of Directors 2. General Manager 3. Chief Engineer 4. Secretary 5. County Auditor acting as ex officio Auditor of the Districts 6. Director of Finance of the J.A.O. 7. General Counsel SECTION 3. SUBSTANTIAL CONFLICT A. An official shall not be deemded to have an economic interest in substantial conflict with the proper exercise of an official's duties within the meaning of Government Code Section 3625(a) if he has only a "remote economic interest" and if the fact of such interest is disclosed to the body or Board of the District and noted in its official records,. and the official in no way attempts to influence any other public official of the District with respect to any matter concerning such remote economic interest. As used in this section, the term "remote economic interest" means: 1. That of a non-salaried member or officer of a non-profit corporation; 2. That of a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee or holder of any position of management in any business entity contracting with the District if such business entity has ten or more other employees and if the officer was an employee or agent of said entity for at least three years prior to his initially accepting his office. For purposes of this subsection, time of employment with the business entity by the officer shall be counted in computing such three-year period even though such entity has been converted from one form of business organization to a different form of business organization within three years of the initial taking of office by such officer. Time of employment in such case shall be counted only if, after the transfer or change in orcnnization, the real. or ultimate ownership for the contracting party is t~e same or substantially similar to AGENDA ITEM #14(c) W-2 EACH DISTRICT that which existed before such transfer or chanGe in organization. For the purposes of this. subsection, stockholders, bondholders, partners, or other persons holding an ~nterest in the business entity are regarded as having the "real or ultimate ownership" of such entity. 3. That of a parent in the earnings of his minor child for personal services; 4. That of a landlord or tenant of a business ·entity contracting . with the District; 5. That of an attorney of a business entity contracting with the District; 6. That of a supplier of goods or services to the District when.such goods or services have been supplied to the District by such officer for at least five years prior to his election or appointment to office; 1. That of a person subject to the provisions of Government Code Section 1090 in any contract or agreement.entered into pursuant to the provisions of the California Land Conservation Act of 1965; 8. That of an officer, director, or employee of a bank, bank holding company, or savings and loan association with which the District has the relationship of borrower or depositor, debtor or creditor; 9. That of a shareholder of a corporation contracting with the District if less than 3% of the shares of such corporation are owned by such officer and total annual income to the officer from dividends, including the value of stock dividends from the corporation, does not exceed 5% of the officer's total annual income, and any other payments made to him by the corporation do not exceed 5% of his total annual income. B. An economic interest in substantial conflict with the proper exercise of an official's duties within the meaning of Section 3625(a) shall not be deemed to exist unless the official would be required to disqualify himself under Section 3625(b) on a continuous and regular basis from activities and actions which AGENDA ITEM #14(c) W-3 EACH DISTRICT constitute a major and significant portion of his official duties and thereby impair his ability to function effectively and fulfill duties of his office. SECTION 4. MATERIAL ECONOMIC EFFECT An action or decision shall not be deemed to have a material effect on an economic interest· un~ess the official has reason to believe that, by reason of the action or decision, an investment, or interest in real property may increase or decrease in value, other than negligibly, or a business entity from which the official derives income or in which he holds a position of employment or management will gain or lose monetarily,· other than negligibly. A change of less than 1% shall be deemed negligible. SECTION 5. MINISTERIAL AND CLERICAL DUTIES Section 3625(b) shall apply only to actions which involve discretion or judgment. It does not apply to actions which are solely ministerial or clerical. SECTION 6. PARTICIPATION A. The terms "participate" and "attempt to influence" as used in Section 3625(b) shall be deemed to include but not be limited to participation in deliberations or debate, or voting on the issue, and the following actions when related to the merits of the issue to be decided on or acted upon: 1. Preparation of oral or written reports. 2. Rendition of oral or written advice. 3. Testimony befo1·e a public agency. 4. Discussion with any officials authorized to decide or assist other public officials to decide the matter. 5. Submission of letters or other documents-to any official authorized to ·aecide or.assist other public officials to decide the matter. 6. Issuance or denial of an official approval. AGENDA ITEM #14(c) W-4 EACH DISTRICT B. Nothine contained herein or in Section 3625 shall abriclLe the right of any citizen, whether or not a public official, to submit information or express views on the same basis as any other private citizen, provided such is done in public and the person indicates he is acting in a private capacity. C. An official directly involved in a matter, .whether as a party, or applicant, or otherwise may, in his private capacity, provide whatever information is necessary and perform any other steps which are required of other citiz~ns in the same situation, individually or by counsel. He may not, however, discuss the matter privately with officials who must decide the matter. SECTION 7. NECESSITY A. An official shall not be subject to Section 3625(b) with respect to any matter which cannot be legally acted upon or decided without his participation. B. Section 3625(b) shall not apply where: 1. A statutory quorum cannot be achieved by continuance or within legally mandated time limits; 2. More than a simple majority vote is required to take a proposed action, and the number of officials entitled to vote is less than the number required; or 3. The official is, by law, the sole officer who can perform the action or make the decision. C. In cases where subsections (b) (1) or (b) (2) apply, all otherwise qualified officials shall be entitled to participate. D. In all cases involving exemptions hereunder, the officials shall comply with Section 3625(d). SECTION 8. DISQUALIFICATION An official who refrains from acting in accordance with Section 3625(b) should publicly announce such abstension but need not declare the nature of the interest which disqualifies such official. AGENDA ITEM #14(c) W-5 EACH DisrrRICT SECTION 9. . INTERPRETJ\'I1ION Any official who is unsure of his duties under Section 3625 should secure a written opinion from counsel. When said opinion i3 complied with in the good faith belief that it is consistent with those provision~, said action shall be deemed in compliance with these guidelines, and such official shall be exempt from the civil penalties ih Section 3751 and the sanctions in Section 3753. SECTION 10. LIMITATIONS ON ACTIONS No action shall be brought pursuant to Section 3751 of the Government Code A. To restrain the execution of or to set aside as void any decision, contract, order, permit, resolution or other official action unless the complaint or petition has been filed and served on.the Secretary of the District within thirty (30) days following the decision, contract, order, permit, resolution or other official action; B. To enjoin an official from violating or to compel an official to co~ply with the provision of Division 4.5 .of Title 1 of the Government Code or of this resolution, unless the complaint or petition has be~n filed and served within 180 days after the violation of Section 3625 of the Government·code occurred. SECTION 11. SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution. The Board of Directors hereby declares that it would have passed this resolution and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clause or phrase be declared invalid. SECTION 12. EFFECTIVE DATE This resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOP'I1ED at a rq;ulnr meet inc; held March 13, 1974. AGENDJ\ ITEM #14(c) W-6 EACH DISTRICT BDLJ/e EnaineerinCJ Corporation .: 1.7 ...... '';_•: ·: l ~ lJ.'t ...... ,,, p 0 £ ... 1 :- r .. '.. . ·-. ·---. -----. Board of Di rectors COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY Attention Mr. Fred A. Harper, General /.Aanager Post Office Box 1728 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer Reaches 10, 11, and Portion of Reach 12 71.: 5.: 7 . .:.: .• July 3, 1974 Pursuant to Nv-.• Harper's request 1 we are pleased to· submit our proposal for furnishing pro- fessional engineering services for the preparation of final plans and specifications for subject project as set forth in the preliminary engineering report dated February 1974. The Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer is part of the original master plan of trunk sewer facilities adopted in June of 1969. It will serve the central portion of the district north of the Santa Ana Freeway. Running northerly from the recently completed Red Hi 11 and Sunflower Inter- ceptor system, the new trunk will relieve the district's existing North Trunk and subtrunks which presently serve this area and are currently flowing at or near peak capacity. Reach 10 begins at the intersection of Red Hill and Mitchell Avenues in the city of Tustin, runs westerly in Mitchel I Avenue to Newport Avenue, northerly in Newport to Irvine Boulevard, with Reach 11 continuing in the Southern Pacific Transportation Company's abandoned right- of-way to Seventeenth Street. This portion of Reach 12 extends northerly in Esplanade Street from Seventeenth Street to Fairhaven Avenue where the project tenninates. Total length of the project is approximately 3-1/2 miles. The total estimated cost, including construction, engineering, design surveying, construc- tion staking, construction inspection, in-plant inspection, lega I, administration, easement acquisition, and incidental costs, is $1,214,000. The preliminary engineering report for this facility has been reviewed by the cities of Tustin and Orange and the County of Orange. It is proposed that construction of the project be accomplished under two contracts ---Reach 10 being one contract and Reach 11 and portion of Reach 12 the second contract. We will provide the following professional engineering services for the final plans and speci- fications and construction phases of the proposed project, based on two individual contracts as outlined above. AGENDA ITEM #38 X-1 DISTRICT 7 County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County -2-July 3, 1974 1. Niake arrangements for and coordinate field surveys, gather benchmark data, existing surveys, etc. If pavement coring is required for final design, make arrangements for outside services. · 2. Research underground utilities records. Includes both field and office contacts with public and municipal utility companies. 3. As required to avoid conflicts between proposed project work and existing utilities, make arrangements for exploratory holes to expose existing utilities for position and elevation. Obtain excavation permits. Solicit proposals from contractors if district forces ore not available for exploratory work. Contact city and county inspection deportments. /.iiark and survey exposed utilities. 4. Prepare engineering data for regulatory permit applications that may be required by the city of Tustin, Orange County Road Department, Southern Pac.ific Transportation Company, the Orange County Flood Control District, and the State Division of Highways. 5. Prepare detailed plans and specifications. 6. Review preliminary and final plans and specifications with the city of Tustin, Orange County Road Department, Harbors, Beaches and Parks District, and the State Division of Highways. Receive traffic control, detour, and pavement replacement requirements. 7. Process final plans and specifications through State Division of Highways. 8. Process final plans and specifications through Southern Pacific Transportation Company. 9. Process final plans through utility companies. 10. Process storm channel undercrossings through Orange County Flood Control District. 11. Prepare estimates of quantities and costs. 12. Deliver original tracings of plans and reproducible plates of the specifications for the district's use in preparing the necessary number of copies for record purposes and dis- tribution to prospective bidders, etc. AGENDA ITEM #38 X-2 DISTRICT 7 County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County -3-July 3, 1974 13. Prepare legal descriptions and plats for right-of-way acquisitions as required for facility location and construction. 14. Assist the district in securing bids, in the tabulation and analysis of bid results, and in letting of the contract. 15. Attend pre-award conferences with contractor, district staff, ciiy of Tustin, Orange County Road Department, and the State Division of Highways. 16. Check shop and working drawings as may be submitted by the contractor. 17. Review laboratory reports on material tests and inspection and correlate such reports with the intention of the plans and specifications. 18. Furnish consultation and advice to the district or its agent during construction. 19. Observe initial operation of the project, witnessing performance tests as required by the specifications, and reporting same to the district. 20. Make a final inspection and report of the completed project with a representative of the district or its agent. 21. Prepare record drawings when construction work has been completed and accepted by the district. This shall mean the original tracings of the plans will be modi- fied if necessary because of deviations from the original work. Since the district will carry out inspection of the project, modifications to the original tracings will be based upon information supplied to the engineer by the district. The original tracings, after modification, will become district property. Our total fee for the proposed project, including the preliminary engineering phase and the design and construction phases, is $63, 855. In accordance with our agreement for · preliminary engineering study fees, we will credit $6,008 toward the total fee, leaving a remaining fee of $57,847. For district accounting purposes, we suggest the fee be divided as follows: $35,287 for Reach 10, and $22,560 for Reach 11 and a portion of Reach 12. It is also suggested that payment be monthly on a percentage-complete basis up to 90 percent at time of delivery of plans and specifications, with 100 percent pay- ment when the work is completed and accepted by the district. Field surveys will be required in order to prepare the plans and specifications. These surveys will include taking topography and culture within the project limits. We propose that all field AGENDA ITEM #38 X-3 DISTRICT 7 ~· County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County -4-July 3, 1974 surveys necessary for design be performed on a per diem basis at the following hourly rates: (1) three-man survey party -$60/hour, (2) two-man survey party -$48/hour, and (3) licensed surveyor -$22/hour. Payment is to be monthly as invoiced. If con- struction staking is requested, these rates will remain in effect until June 30, 1975, at which time they would be subject to revision. We propose that all outside services required and approved by the district, such as pavement coring, plant inspection for quality control, and materials used on the proj- ect construction, be paid directly by the district upon presentation of a statement for such outside services with the engineer's certification. lfwe are authorized to proceed with this work at the July 10~ 1974, board meeting, we can have· plans and specifications ready for advedising bids in December 1974 on Reach 10 and in February 1975 on Reach 11 and portion of Reach 12. BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION Omo~_)(/_ 1r Conrad Ho hen er, Jr. , PE Principal Civil Engineer B-C07-123-50 AGENDA ITEM #38 X-4 DISTRICT 7 COUNTY SANITATION DI~TRICT NO._JL BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS FUND DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE )!rectors Fees ~ontractual Services -Share of Joint Operating Professional Services ~rinting & Publication rrave 1 & Meeting -Directors' Mileage TOTAL REQUIREMENTS ~ess: Cash Carry-Over & Revenue ='unds Available July l Budgeted Requirements 73/74 Actual Expenditures 73/74 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income & Transfers ~ash Carry-Over [nterest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH & REVENUE \MOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES AGENDA. ----~-~--·- ITEM #42 & 1974/75 FISCAL YEAR 19 7 4 / 7 5 EST I MATED ASSESSED VAL UA Tl 0 N $ 1 !~ 3 , 3 6 5 , 2 2 7 1974/75 EST. A. V. ADJUSTED FOR '..>~ DEL I NQ. $ 13(', 1)6,966 1974/75 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A. V. $Ho T:n Rat P ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $1{o T:::x R:.ite APPROVED APPROVED EST I MATED RECOMMENDED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL BU.OGF ... EXPENDIT~RES ~ 1q7217~ 1q7~174 1973/7 1974/75 600 600 200 600 600 600 600 600 1,600 1,100 465 500 350 350 100 100 . 26 100 826· 3,400 2,750 2,115 ~ 2,750 826 1,924 67 3,282 2,627 1,991 1,991 118 123 124 ------ 3,400 2,750 2,115 -0--0--0- ··- """ . -Y-DISTRICT t- RESOLUTION NO. 74-96-11 ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 17 -BOLSA CHICA STATE BEACH ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 17 -BOLSA CHICA STATE BEACH ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11) * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to County Sanitation District No. 11 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a petition filed by the property owner; and, Section 2. That pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commissicn for annexation of said territory to County Sanitation District No. 11 by means of Resolution No. 74-42-11, filed with said Commission by the District; and, Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 17 -Bolsa Chica State Beach Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 11", the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit '!A" and shown on Exhibit "B" ·attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 4. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and, Section 5. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and, Section 6. That annexation of said territory is subject to payment of annexation fees in the amount of $990.00; and, AGENDA ITEM #45 Z-1 DISTRICT 11 Section 7. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described hereinabove, be and it is hereby ordered annexed to Qounty Sanitation District No. 11 without notice or hearing and without election, subject to the provision of Section 6. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #45 Z-2 DISTRICT 11 RESOLUTION NO. 74-97-11 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH STATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION FOR DISPOSAL OF SEWAGE ORIGINATING WITHIN BOLSA CHICA STATE BEACH A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH STATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION FOR DISPOSAL OF SEWAGE ORIGINATING WITHIN THE BOLSA CHICA STATE BEACH AND PROVIDING FOR PAYMENT THEREOF * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, DOES ~EREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement, dated between County Sanitation District No. 11 and the ·State of California, acting through the Department of Parks and Recreation, for disposal of sewage originating within the Bolsa Chica State Beach, and providing for payment of capacity rights and annual maintenance and operating costs, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement, in form approved by the General Counsel, on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #46 -AA-DISTRICT 11 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,8 & 11 DISTRICT 1 1/ (GARTHE) ••••• PATTERSON •••• ·-.----- (CLARK) •••••• BATTIN ••••• ···-~.-. ---- RI MA ••••••• ··._ ... _ -- (LANGLEY) •••• SALTARELLI.···-··----- DISTRICT 2 ' D' '''NEl •••••• w INN • • • • • • • • • ------L....,,NS ••••• ·CALLAHAN • • • • • -' ----- EWING •••• ··CHAPUT·······-· ----- BAKER ······CLARK········_, ----- PATTERSON)· ~GARTHE • • • • •• ·-··----- NEVIL-) •• ····GRAHAM······· ------ THO(vl) • • • • • • ·KAYWOOD • • • • • • -· .----- FOX) • • • • • • • ·MAC KAIN· • • • • • ~ ---- PERRY • • • • • • • • -j-----~STANTON) ····SCOTT········-·-.----- PERE ) ······TEMPLE·······-~ --·--- ROOTY ••••••.• wooD ••••••••• -~· _ ---- DISTRICT 3 '\ ... , !MAC KAIN.) ••• -Fe*;-••••••••• -·-· -- NUIJENS) ····ARB ISO.······-~ .. ----- CLARK)····· ·BATTIN···· • • • -~----- COLLI NS)··· ·BYRNE········-"----- CULVER.······ _v_ ---- (MEYER)······ DAVIS· • • • • • • • _/_ ----ii EDWARDS······ ------ PATTERSON) • • GARTHE • • • • • • • _,,,_.· ---- THO(vl) • • • • • • • KAYWOOD· • • • • • -···----- COX) • • • • • • • ·LONG· • • • • • • • • ~ ---- B LACK(v1AN) ···Me KNEW • • • • • • -J-.· ---- y 'NG)······ NEVIL········-"-__ --~D) •••••• ·ROOT· • • • • • • • • _../ ____ _ ~LACAYO)···· ·SONJU· • • • • • • • ~ __ -- SCOTT)····· ·SVALSTAD· • • • • _. ____ _ COEN)······· WI EDER·······_/ ____ _ DISTRICT 5 (RYCKOFFL ••• MC INNIS ••••• _I_ ---- (BAKER) •••••• CLARK •••••••• -.;'----- ROGERS ••••.•• _,,_ ---- DISTRICT 6 PORTER ••••••• ------ (CLARK) •••••• BATTIN....... ---- (MC INNIS) ••• STORE •••••••• ------ DISTRICT 7 (LANGL~Y)· ···SALTARELLI··· ---- (PRYOR •••••• BURTON.... • • • ---- (BAKER •• ) ••• CLARK........ ---- (MC INNIS.•·· DOSTAL·······, __ ---- (PEREZ) •••••• JACKMAN...... . ---- (GARTHE) ••••• PATTERSON.... · ---- PORTER. • • • • • • ---- DI~RICT 11 ~COEN) ••••• • • DUKE. • • • • • • • • "' ---- CLARl<) ••• • •• BAKER •••••• • • ------ COEN) ••••••• GIBBS •.•••••• -------- DISTRICT 8 ./ MITCHELL.. •• •• ---- (BAKER) •• •••• CLARK········~ ---- (JOHNSON) ••• • HOLM • • • • • • • • _l• ---- 7/10/74 JOINT BOARDS · PORTER· • • • • • _:.·_ -- NU I JENS) ARBISO· • • • • ._v __ _ CLARK~· • • • • • ·BAKER~ • • • • • • -~.--- CLARK •······BATTIN······-·--- PRYOR ·······BURTON······_'. __ _ COLLI!S) ·····BYRNE······._ .. __ _ L VONS • • • • • • ·CALLAHAN· • • • ~. -. __ EWING • • • • • • ·CHAPUT· • • • • • -"·-' __ BAKER • • • • • • ·CLARK······._ ..... · __ . _ CULVER······ ·1 ~MEYER)·······DAVIS····~··--:--=== MC IN.NI s). · · · ·DOSTAL· • •' • • • _·. __ _ COEN)· • • • • • • ·DUKE· • • • • • • ·-·· _. __ EDWARDS····· · MAC KAIN).··· ·f~· • • • • • • .-... --- PATTERSON).·.· GARTHE· • • • • ·---:--=== NEVI[_).····· ·GRAHAM······ .. · COEN)······· ·GIBBS······· · PEREZ)······ ·JACKMAN····.-.. --- THOr) • ·······KAYWOOD····.-.. --- (COX ·········LONG········~=== ! F 0 X • • • • • • • • • MAC KA I N • • • • ·· RYCKOFF) • • • • ·MC INNIS • • • .-.. --- BLACKMAN)··· ·MG-KNEW-.····.-"--- -YO. UNG) • • • • • • ·NEVIL· • • • • • ·-L--- : GARTHE) ······PATTERSON··.-.,--- . PERRY· • • • • • .-~--- RI MA·······.-,--- ROGERS· • • • • .-_, --- (WOOD) • • • • • • • ·ROOT· • • • • • • .-.--- (LANGLEY)····· SALTARELLI·· / === STANTON) • • • • ·SCOTT· • • • • • • LACAYO)······ SONJU • • • • • • ·-r -- MC I N31 S ). • • • ·STORE· • • • • • • 11. === SCOTT ·······SVALSTAD···· v PEREl • • • • • • ·TEMPLE· • • • • ·-.;--- COEN)······· ·WI EDER·····.-/--- ) ~--DUNNE •••••••WINN••••••• •_v __ _ ROOT) • • • • • • • ·WOOD· • • • • • • • _/_ -- * * * * * * * * * OTHERS J HARPER SYLVESTER v LEWIS ·~· CLARKE I/ TAYLOR :,./ BROWN ---:;;:;- NISSON --:T EWING ..,/ HOHENER ... --HOWARD HUNT I,,./ KEITH __.J!_ KENNEY -"-LYNCH ·_,,./ MADDOX v --MARTINSON ...... --PIERSALL STEVENS ... -- 7/10/74 JOINT MEETING (6) Election of Joint Chairman Mcinnis and Saltarelli appointed to canvassing committee. Voted by District. asked Baker/whether· it was legal ror some representatives on more than one District to vote more than once. Nisson answered that was the way it has always been and yes, it is legal. Winn elected Joint Chairman (7) Election of Vice Joint Chairman Director Wood asked that the candidates say a few words about themselves since there was ·nothing in the agenda on them. Duke said that he believed that the Vice Chairman should be a strong support for the Joint Chairman and be able to take over in his absence and to assist him. Director Graham spoke for Norma Gibbs. Said she had been on our Board as a representative from Seal Beach from 1960-63 and again in 1970 when elected '..;te Huntington Beach City Council. Was recently honored when she received Professor-of-the-Year award at Cal State, Long Beach. Voted by District. Norma Gibbs elected. (9) Report of the Joint Chairman Called a meeting of the Executive Committee for July 30th at 5:30 p.m. and invited Directors Kaywood and Graham to .attend. Kaywo od said she had a City council meeting that day so didn't know if it wo uld be over in time to attend. 10) Report of General Manager invited Mr. Harper xai~xxkax the Chairman and Vice Chairman t o a noon meeting on July 30th to meet with the State Water Resources Control Board. ~entioned that Russell Train was at Mayors ~ Conference in San Diego and he is very much aware of secondary treatment. Read a portion of a newspaper article from San Diego giving Mr. Train's comments regarding secondary treatment. Said another interesting article was sent to him from a newspaper in Bangar, Maine. This is where Senator Muskie, the author of the Water Pollution Control Bill, is fr om. Th ey are also asking Muskie to change the bill. Said the main reason for the SWRCB' s ·· coming here was to look at the JPL process and discuss the secondary treatment problem and try to get the±r support in Washington. FAH then reported that CASA is having their annual conference in San Diego on August 22nd & 23rd. Said any Directors that wish to attend were certainly welcome, and he would send out registration material and information. Advised that they hoped to have representatives from EPA in San Francisco and also some State people there. ) Report of the General Counsel Nisson said that not much had happened since the last meeting two weeks ago. Said that there was one item -that had been on the back burner for a couple months. Advised that under our connection ordinance regarding permit fees, we have a provision that if they don't pay, there is a delinquency charge as provided by the statute. 10% added to the bill plus 1/2% per month. Have approximately 10-20 delinquencies. Range from $5 to $500 . Will bundle them all up and go into small claims court . Many customers that are delinquent will pay original bill but will not pay penalty. Losing proposition. but ordinance doesn't give us any leeway. · (12b) (14b) (14c) p. 2 or Temple Director Jackman/moved to removed item 12(b) from the Consent Calendar. Balance of Consent Calendar moved & seconded . Questioned the reason for the change order which indicated it was to bring the warehousing into conformance with the building codes and fire codes of the City of Fountain Valley. Questioned this sizable a change. Asked if this shouldn't be picked up by architect. Also asked if there had been any recent changes in building code. Ray Lewis advised that this was part of the 1971-72 grant program. Were seven projects under that particular grant. Let the various contracts at various times. We were in conformity with 1969 Uniform Fire & Building Codes. Said we got hit with new UBC and OSHA require- ments between the time we went out to contract and the bid. Mentioned some of the new requirments which we have now complied with. Director then restated his question that there have been changes in the building code and was answered, yes. Moved item 12(b), seconded and carried. Svalstad commented that normally ·you don't go out to bid until you get plans and specs approved. Asked what period of time there was between bidding and actually starting construction? REL answered between 6-8 months . Saltarelli stated that there was a 242 calendar day extension of time and asked if that was reason for this $20,000. REL answered, no it was not. Conflicts of Interest Nisson advised that he wrote a rather lengthy memo on this which was in the agenda package. Said his conclusion or recommendation would be that since they have very little exposure in the four months left of this Act, would be better not adopting guidelines at this time. Or if they do decide to adopt guidelines, recommended they d o not adopt disclosure portion. Patterson said he understood that Proposition 9 repeals this. Asked if this applies to us. Nissan said yes, effective January 9, 1975. Guidelines cannot be approved by Board of Supervisors or other agencies until January 1, 1976. Moved Nisson's recommendation to take no action. Seconded and carried for all Districts. (15) JPL Process Reported that three months ago Board authorized us to proceed with experimental work and the funds have now been expended forihe work done so far. We had the Chief of the SWRCB grant team d own here and he was impressed with the project and asked us to submit to the State a preliminary report for them to consider. Were going to get a college professor to look at report and figured within 30 days fr om time we got report in, we would get an answer on project for 1 MGD facility. We may not receive the full amount asked for ($3.5 million) but does appear from woF.k done so far that this is going t o be a worthwhile program. Are two actions qn agenda--One to authorize expenditure of another $10,000~ $7500 of which would be staff time and $2500 Board consulting work with JPL people. Other item is a commitment of an expenditure of $100,000 .to finish up work we wo u ld need to do on trailer model to get information to design 1 MGD facility. That would be only on the .basis that we receive the go ahead from State people. Will rave people here on the 30th. Questi on was asked if we shouldn't wait until after that meeting to see what kind of a reaction we get. Mr. Harper said that he thought what we were attempting to do was to demonstrate to EPA and State that we were willing to go ahead with program that they would not fund to prove it is an important program. This .is a declaration of intent. Was asked what amount was estimated. FAH advised NASA and JPL said they would match whatever the Districts would come up with. Said our staff and JPL people got together and figured it wouldn't run over $200,000. JPL has spent some $260,000 on this project so far. Moved items 15(b) & (c). . ' (18) (24) (37a) Called Executive Session to consider personnel matter. 8:40 -8:56 p.m. DIST. 2 Other business p. j Nisson stated that he needed a motion authorizing payment on a judgment for a piece of right of way we went to trial on last month. $12,248.83 and includes $801.33 worth of interest, so we can cut off interest. It was then moved to authorize payment and have Nisson sign warrant. Tustin-Orange EIR Jackman stated that this was before them before and at that time had stated that it was preliminary and would go into detail later. Wondered if they weren't going to do that now. He was advised that it was explained in detail at last month's meeting but he was absent then. Said he had a question regarding Handy Creek. REL stated that they were presently trying to coordinate our activities with Flood Control. This project is a small sewer 18-21". Not a real deep sewer. Said construction in the area would be relatively short. Long-term effects would not be visible. Will be coordinated with whatever Flood Control comes up with as part of cooperative planning study by the County.