HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-05-08l
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
May 2, 1974
TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11
Gentlemen:
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange
County, California, will be held:
WEDNESDAY EVENING, MAY 8, 1974
AT 7:30 P.M.
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
Tentative adjournments prior to next regular meeting:
Executive Committee -5:30 p.m., May 28, 1974
Orientation for new Directcrs -5:30 p.m., May 30, 1974
MANAG ER~S AG EN DA REP ORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, Cal i fornia
JOINT BO A RDS
REGULAR MEETING
Wedn·e sday , May 8·; ·197 4
· T:3o· ·p·.m .
Post O ffice Box 8127
10844 Ellis Ave n ue
Fou n ta in Volley, Cal if., 9270 8
Tele phones:
Area Code 71 4
5 '4 0-2 910
962-2 4 11
For the new Directors who may not be familiar with our
procedures, the General Manager submits an agenda report prior
to each meeting, together with a formal agenda, to provide back-
ground information nec essary f o r the principal items of business
to be taken up. Please bring this material with yo u to the meeting.
Thi s report is for the next Joint meeting of the Boards of
Di rectors of Districts Nos . 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, which will
be held on Wednesday, May 8th, at 7:30 p .m., in the Districts'
office at the above address. At each of these Joint meetings, the
Boards take up items relating to joint operations of all the Dis -
t r icts and the individual Boards also take action on current business
of their resp ective Districts. The Board of District No . 8 meets
quarterly in July, October: J a nuary, and April .
**************
The following is a brief explanation of the more important,
non-routine it e ms which appear o n the enc losed agenda and which are
not otherwise self-explanator y. Warrant lists are no t attached to
the agenda since they are made up immedi a tely preceding the meeting,
but will appear in the supplemental agenda available at the meeting.
Joint Boards
No . 3 -Seating of New Direc tor s :-
Our office is currently being advised of recent elections
of new mayors, appo int ments of alte rnates to the mayors, and other
new Directors . A list of Directors and alternates compil ed from
inform ation r ece ived to date will be available at the meeting.
Nos . 4 through 10 -Annual Election of Districts' Chairmen:
In accordance with the Districts ' standa rd pr ocedures , a
Cha i rman for eac h Distri ct Board is elected annually at the May
meeting . The Joint Ch a irman and Vice Joint Chairman are elected
in July, following nominations at the June meeting .·
The Cha irmen for the past year were as follows:
District No. Director Representing
1 Jerry Patterson City o f Santa Ana
2 Robert Nevil City of La Habra
3 Donald Fox City of Brea
5 Don Mcinnis City of Newport Beach
6 Ellis Porter Costa Mesa Sani tary District
7 Don Smith City of Orange
Don Saltarelli
Chm . Pro Tern since
March 13th City of Tustin
11 Henry Duke City of Huntington Beach
For the information of the new Directors , the Districts'
re gulations provide that each Chairman automatically becomes a
member of the Executive Committee which ord i narily meets monthly at
the call of the Joint Chairman . This Committee, which is the on ly
standing committee of the Directors, also includes the Joint Chairman ,
Vic e Joint Chairman , and a representative of the County Board of
Supervisors . Its function is to study and make recommendations to
the Joint Boards concerning Joint Districts ' matters , such as : budgets ,
salaries, personnel, policies, etc .
No. 1 3 -Report of the Joint Chairman .
An orientation program is being planned for new Directors
t o assist them in learning about the Districts and how they function .
We have selected 5 :3 0 p .m., Thursday , May 30th , as a tent a tive time
and date to tour the treatment plants and hold a session o n the make -
up of the Boards as well as a discussion of the long -range plans and
objectives of the Districts .
No . 16 -Report of the Executive Committee and Actions Thereon .
The Committee met on the evening of April 23rd; however , in
the absence of a quorum, the Committee was unable to officially
take up any matters on its agenda . A report of the meeting , inc l uding
a consensu s of the Committee membe rs present , is included for all
activ e Directors.
No. 20 -Staff Report o n Proposed National Pollutant Dischar ge
Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Regulations .
As previously reported , the staff has h ad several meetings with
representatives of EPA and the Regional Water Quality Control Board ,
conc erning the requirements which have been pr oposed by them to be
-2-
included in the Districts' NPDES Permit. Because of the complexity
of 'the pro posed requir ements , they have agreed to recomm end a con-
tinuance of the May 3rd he ar ing to June 7th. This will provide
ample time for t he J o int Boards to consider the new requir ements.
On Wednesday, we will report on the May 3rd hearing discussions and
staff recommendations for changes to the proposed requirements which
may be more meaningful to the Districts.
No . 22 -Report of the General Counsel re : Sani tary Districts '
Represent ation o n the Boards of the Sanitation Districts.
The attorney for the Garden Grove San i tar y District has sub-
mitt ed an opinion to o ur Districts concerning the p rovisions o f
Section 4730 o f the Ca lifornia Health and Safety Code insofar as th ey
pertain to sanitary distr ict representati on on the Sanitation District
Boards . The written opinion has been forwarded to the San i tation
Distric ts' General Counsel for a re port. Mr . Nisson has been in touch
with the Garden Grove Sanitary District atto r ney and will be report-
ing t o the Boards on this matter Wednesday ev ening .
No . 23 -Open House and Plant Inspect i on Tour f or Public
Officials.
Several years ago, the Boards of Dire ctors hosted a very
successful open house and plant inspection tour for elected publ ic
officials throughout the County. This proved to be very beneficial
in di sseminating the Districts ' program to provide modern wastewater
treatment and dispos a l facilities . The action appearing on the
agenda authorizes the staff t o make arrangements for another open
house and plant inspection tour to be held We d nesday , September
25th for all e l ected officials and key staff members of the Dis -
tric ts ' member agencies .
No. 24 -Change Order No . 6 to Job No . I -8 -3.
This Change Order authorizes an add ition of $1 8 ,000 to the
bontract with E .T .I . & Kordick , a joint venture , for Influent
Metering and Di version Structure at Reclamation Plant No. 1 . · This
addition covers the installation of a rolling gate with appurten-
ances , and 1 2 ,000 square feet of paving . It is the staff 's r ecom -
mendation that this Change Order be approve d.
No . 25 -Financial Report for the Nine -Mo nth Period Ended
March 31.
Included with the age nd a materia l is a financial report
prepared by the Districts ' Director of Finance for the first nine
months of this fiscal year. It appears that a11 · Funds will operate
we ll within the ir bud g et a l locations; however , the r eport contains
recommend ations for budget transfers between certain accounts in
the Joint Op e rating Fund to cover anticipated cost ove.r-runs for
the fourth quarter of 1 973 -74 , and transfers of unappropriated re -
serves in Districts N os~ 7 and 11.
-3-
District No. 11
No. 40 -Authorizing Execution of a Quitclaim Deed.
. The action appearing on the agenda quitclaims a portion of
the Di strict 's easement over Ed i son property which is no longer
needed due to the relocation of the Newland Avenue F or ce Ma in.
It is the staff 's rec ommendation that Resolution No . 74-71-11 be
approved.
No. 41 -Change Order No. 1 to Cont ract No. 11-12.
Th e act ion appearing on the agenda under this item authorizes
an addition of $745 .31 to the contract with Kordick and Son, Inc .,
for utility relocation in connection with the Slater Avenue Trunk
Sewer Extension. The staff recommends that the Change Order be
approved .
District No . 3
No. 47 -Approval of Pl ans and Specifi cations for Imperial
Relief Interceptor Sewer, Reaches 22 and 23, Contract No . 3 -1 9 .
The Distri ct 's engineers have completed the Plans and Speci -
fications for Contract No . 3 -1 9 . The resolution appearing in the
agenda approves the Plans and Specifications and authorizes adver-
tising for b ids upon receipt of permits from the State Division of
Hi ghways. The sewer will be installed in Imperial Highway. The
engineer's estimate is $590 ,000.
No. 48 -Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Kn ott
Intercept or , Reaches 5 throug h 8.
The action appearing on the agenda authorizes the filing of
a Notice of Comple tion of the draft Environmental Impact Report for
the proposed c o nstruction of the Knott I nterc eptor . The tot al costs
for Reaches 5 through 8 of the Knott Interceptor are expected to be
about $1 0 million . The r oute of the interceptor runs in Golden
West Street, Knott Avenue, and Artesia Street . The project wi ll
extend from Westminster Avenue and Golden West in the City of
Westminster, to Artesia and Knott Avenues in the City of Buena Park .
In gen eral , the pipe size wil l be 66 " inside diameter and capable
of handling 70 million gal lons of wastewater per day . Upon filing
the Notic e of Completion of t he draft report, copies of the report
will be forwarded to the affected public agenci es for the ir comments .
District No . 2
No . 53 -Approvin g Plans and Speci fications for Carbon Canyon
Interc e ptor Sewer , Contract No . 2-1 8 .
The Plans and Specificat i ons have been completed for Contract
No . 2-1 8 , and· i t is recommended that standard Resol uti on No . 74-73-2
be approved, which authorizes advertising for bids on June 4th. The
-4-
engineer's estimate for this project is $1,404,000. This contract
is one of three which, when completed, will divert sewage flows
from the overloaded State College Boulevard system.
No. 54 -Change Order No. 13 to ·contract No. 2-14-1.
The Change Order appearing in the supporting agenda material
authorizes the addition of $11,544 to the cpntract as provided by
the specifications for additional rock bedding. It is the staff's
recommendation that the Change Order be approved.
No. 55 -Staff Report on Public Hearings Conducted by the
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA), on Reach 3 of the
Santa Ana River Interceptor.
Two public hearings are scheduled on May 7th for the purpose
of discussing the merits and alternatives relating to the final _
phases of constr~ction of the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor. The
staff has sent notice~ of the hearings to the Directors during the
past several weeks. We plan to report on the results of the public
hearing on Wednesday.
District No. 7
Nos. 61 and 62 -Closeout of Contract No. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2,
7-3B-l and 7-3E-l.
The Change Orders to the Plans and Specifications appearing
in Agenda Item No. 61 authorize payment for additional work and
adjustment of engineer 's quantities as well .as an extension of time
of 16 calendar days. The detailed Change Orders are included in
the supporting agenda material. It is recommended that they be
approved. Item No. 62 approves the Final Closeout Agreement and
authorizes recording of the Notice of Completion . The total cost
of this project is $27,732.88.
No. 63 -Draft Environmental Impact Report for Tustin-Orange
Trunk Sewer, Reaches 10 through 18.
The Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer will serve the central po~tion
of the District north of the Santa Ana Freeway. The proposed trunk
sewer will relieve the District's existing North Trunk and subtrunks
which presently serve this area and are currently flowing at or near
peak capacity. The total length of the proposed Tustin-Orange Trunk
i s 48,470 feet or 9.2 miles. The sewers will vary i n size from
27 inches to 18 inches. The estimated total project cost is $2 ,314,000 .
Upon authorization of Notice of Completion of the Draft Environmental
Impact Report, all affected agencies wil l receive copies of the re-
port and will be asked to comment prior to June 26th. It is recom-
mended that the action app e aring in the agenda be approved .
-5-
No . 64 -Pr oposed Annexation No . 40 -Tract No . 8266 to
Dis t rict No . 7 .
Th e p r operty owners of 4.38 ac r es in the v i cinity of Sant i ago
Bo ul evard and Walnut Avenue have requested annexation to the District .
This property lies within the City of Orange and the densities of the
pr oposed development wi ll b e consistent with the Distri ct 's Master
Pl a n. Therefo r e , i t is recommended that the initiation of annexation
p r oceedin gs be authorized .
No . 66 -Staff Report on Discussions with City of Orange
Pe r sonnel Regarding Sewer Service for a Proposed Restaurant in
Co u nty Territory at the Intersection of Chapman Avenue and Crawford
Ca n yon Road .
At the April meeting of the Board , the staff was directed to
hold discussions with representatives of the City of Orange regarding
the request fo r sewer service for property l ocated in an unincorporated
area immediately adjacent to a City of Orange sewer . We will be re -
porting on the results of the discussions and possible alternative
solutions .
-6-
Fred A. Harper
Gen e ral Ma n ager
JOINT CHAIRMAN
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
CALL MEETING
AT 5:30 P,M,
A () :;J 9 -1-"-LU '>l-1>!.
OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR l -HE-Si3-A-Y) l1A¥-28-TH)
INVITE DIRECTORS SVALSI 8D AND .,S..g~JU OR DIRECTORS ==
KAYWOOD AND BYRNE TO ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSIONS,
ANNOUNCE THAT AN ORIENTATION PROGRAM IS BEING PLANNED FOR NEW
DIRECTORS TO ASSIST THEM IN LEARNING ABOUT THE DISTRICTS AND
HOW THEY FUNCTION, WE HAVE SELECTED 5:30 P.M,) THURSDAY) MAY 30)
AS A TENTATIVE TIME AND DATE TO TOUR THE TREAT MENT PLANTS AND
HOLD A SESSION ON THE MAKEUP OF THE BOARDS AS WELL AS A DI S-
CUSSION OF THE LONG-RANGE PLANS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE DISTRICTS,
5/8/74
Joint Chairman Porter:
Re: Agenda Item No. 3
The City of La Habra advised today by telephone of a change in
Directorship as indicated below and advised that the Directors
would be hand delivering the Minute Excerpt tonight.
DISTRICT ACTIVE ALTERNATE
2 Beth Graham Robert Nevil*
3 Robert Nevil* Rehe!t Young
(*Mayor)
( ( (
MONITORING PROGRAM COST FOR NPDES PERMIT Agenda Item No. d-o
Monitoring
Divisions Revised Proe;ram Present Pro~ram** ..
District's
Staff Laboratory Equip. Boat Laboratory Boat
Recommendation Hours ~1000 Days Hours ~
Influent 413 1~770 1,770
Effluent 1,190 1,990 8 1,800
Beach 1,570 3,650 l 1,570
Nears ho re 1,040 1,040 104 520 104
Water Column 512 512 3 24 .40 l
Sediments 6,012 10,120 10 12 4
Surf ace slick 200 200 1 4
Gill netting
Line fishing 360 360 4
Trawling 1,844 1,844 1 4 350 4
Kelp photos 16 16 1 1* 32 2*
TOTALS 13,215 21,502 25 153 3,316 110
Consultant fees
for Trawls and
Dives -------$22,000
TOTAL COST $176,ooo $242,000 $91,000
*Airplane cost figured as boat day
**No additional equipment or facilities required
, ,
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127
ol Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
II
(1)
(2)
(3)
ff\\::>
~llf ~v~··.•••.
lETIER --·--··-
A/C •..• TKLR •..•
-·••O•UOoo.o -o o_..o...., .... _
(4)
(5)
(6)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
MEETING DATE ADJOU RNME:NTS POSTC:O .. :;-
COM P & MI LEAGE ... ~ ... .
FILES SET UP ..... /. ..... . MAY ·g; 1974 ·-7 :·30 -p .-MI
RESOLUTI ON S C E RT I FIED ~
LETTER S wri:nrn .... ~ ..
MINU TES \VR iTT EN .... ~
MINUTES HLED ..... ~ .•••
Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
Roll Call
DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11
Consideration of motion to receive and file minute
excerpts from the following cities regarding elections
of mayors and appointments of alternates, and seating
Re~\~~~bers of _E
3
he Boards ~~~ ~1,~~
OI)....; ~"-'---' ~~'-.. ~~~
CITY DIST. NO. -ACTIVE ALTERNATE
Anaheim
Huntington
Beach
2 & 3
3
11
11
3
Miriam Kaywood W. J. Thom*
Alvin M. Coen*~Harriett M. Wieder
Alvin M. Coen~ Norma B. Gibbs
Henry H. Duke Alvin M. Coen* Ph~llip H. Cox~ Charles L. Long Los Alamitos
DISTRICT 1
Annual election of Chairman of the Board -<::::1~
DISTRICT 2
Annual election of Chairman of the Board -w ~
DISTRICT 3
Annual election of Chairman of the Board -'-:...\ '1-
DISTRICT 5 -D.L'.~· & -t. ~ ! ".t'---u
Annual election of Chairman of the Board
DISTRICT 6
Annual election of Chairman of the Board -~ ~
DISTRICT 7
Annual election of Chairman of the Board -~n5JS-, tlu.;...
DISTRICT 11
Annual election of Chairman of the Board -~ v-h~ ...
Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary
EACH DISTRICT
Consideration of motions approving minutes of the
following meetings, as mailed:
District 1 April 10, 1974 regular
District 2 April 10, 1974 regular
District 3 April
District 5 April
District 6 " April
District 7 April
District 11 April
10,
10,
10,
10,
10,
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
regular
regular
regular
regular
regular
' < . ' ~.\.) k, 0-C ·> '!-~-)\_..._.. )'o:;."l..t'" ~Q -
§
~ b '
@
(16)
N\\'J
(17)
v ~\<7
FILE ··············•·-
lffiER S .. _:::.~
A/C ••.. TKLR -
(18)
FILE ···-··-··-·····
LETTER ~ •.... :.. \ s
A/C ._.TKLR •••• __ ....l_
'---····-·-
(19)
FILE ········-·-·· ~ ~
LETIER ·······-···-
A/C .-.TKLR ....
t,,.. '· ... .;. . .,._ .. ,.,. .............. .
____ ................ M#
FILE --~--
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Joint Chairman
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the General Manager
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the General Counsel
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Executive Committee and consideration
of motion to receive and file the Committee's written
rep ort
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion accepting proposal of Lee C. White
to assist the Districts and other consenting West Coast
sewerage agencies in securing an environmentally sound
and fiscally responsible Federal "secondary treatment"
definition which is consistent with the State-adopted
California Ocean Plan, on a cost-sharing basis with said
consenting agencies for a maximum fee not to exceed
$6,000 plus Districts' proportionate share of actual
incidental expenses
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion authorizing execution of a
Memorandum of Understanding with the Jet Propulsion
Laboratory (JPL) of the California Institute of Technology
in support of an Environmental Protection Agency construction
grant for the JPL activated carbon wastewater treatment
process .
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of the followin g items in connection with
utilization of digester sludge gas :
(a) Consideration of motion authorizing and directing
the staff to prepare plans and specifications for
Replacement of Interplant Gas Line, Job No. I-4R,
and authorizing advertising for bids
._____. ( b )
LETTER ···-··-··-· Consideration of motion authorizing and directing
A/c--:::TKl: '""\
(\ v' ./ --·-··-~ ........
FILE ···-··-······-
LETIER ............. .
A/C ••.. TKLR ••••
---
FILE ................. .
LETIER ·······-···-
A/C .... TKLR -·
(c)
(d)
the staff to prepare plans and specifications for
Installation of Gas Metering Equipment, Job No. I-4-3,
and authorizing advertising for bids
Consideration of motion authorizing and directing
the staff to further investigate the feasibility of
improving the quality of digester gas and report
back to the Boards the cost effectiveness of removing
moisture and carbon dioxide content from the digester
gas
Consideration of motion authorizing and directing
the staff to negotiate with General Crude Oil Company,
Southern California Edison Company and others, for the
sale of any excess digester gas, to be conditioned
upon availability of said excess gas, and incorporating
an escalation clause to reflect increased demand and
an adjustment in the rates to reflec t improvements in
quality of the gas suppl i ed
-2-
... ·~_8
LETIER ···-·········
A/C •... TKLR ...•
-----·-r21) '--,,-·-
FILE ···············-N\ \ s,
LETIER ·······-·····
A/C .•.. TKLR .•••
=----~-:-~·.:=-~
FILE ••..•...........••
LETIER ·······-·····
A/C .... TKLR .•.•
-······-··'-2.3)
~-·---~~>M\s
FILE ···········-··-· ./
u:nER ---···-·
A/C _TKl.R .•••
---·--,.·······-·-_ .. ____ .......... . (24)
FILE ······-··········
I.ETIER •••.•• , s
A/C .... TKLR ·-
FILE ·····-····-·-( 2 5 )
LETIER ··-···-·-1 S,
A/C ••.. TKLR ·-·N\ I
~-···· ... ··-·-
(26)
fV\ I>
(27)
ALL DISTRICTS
Staff report on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) Permit regulations proposed by EPA and the
Regional Water Quality Control Board
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of Resolution No.
No. 70-3, as amended, to change
period for industrial accidents
legislative actions. See page
ALL DISTRICTS
74-70 amending Resolution
the disability payment
to comply with recent
"A"
Report of General Counsel regarding sanitary districts
representation on the Boards of the County Sanitation
Districts
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to make
arrangements for an open house and plant inspection tour
of the Districts' facilities, to be held Seiptember 25, 197 4
for elected officials and key staff members of the
Districts' member agencies
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6
to the plans and specifications for Influent Metering
and Diversion Structure at Reclamation Plant No. 1,
Job No. I-8-3, authorizing an addition of $18,000.00
to the contract with E.T.!. & Kordick, A Joint Venture
See page "B"
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file financial
report of Director of Finance for nine-month period ending
March 31, 1974; and authorizing budget transfers, as
recommended by the Director of Finance
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress
report on Treatment Plant Construction Projects. See
page "C"
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file certification
of the General Manager that he has checked a ll bills
appearing on the agenda, found them to be in o rder , and
that he recommends authorization for payment
(28) ALL DISTRICTS
(28) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint
Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant books
ROLLCALL VOT!.----for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and
authorizing payment of claims listed on page "I"
(29) ALL DISTRICTS
FI LE ................. . Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any :e~--~~~~--~:: ((2;;))consideration of Resolution No. 74-76, authorizing filing
-·---~application for Federal and State grants for publicly-owned ___ 1\1\\ c wastewater treatment works and providing certain assurances
i.---IV\ ) See page "IV"
E ••• --····· L~ER<)-·1
··-~29b) Consideration of Resolut lon No. 74-77, endorsing the Clean
AJC __ .TKLR •••• Water Bond Act of 197 4 (Proposition 2) See page "V"
-----··-~ s.
--~O)\ ~~S 1 & 7 ~ ~ra~~0-t·fon'a~ovin . uspens~ fun.._d-warrants,
~ if any. See supplemental agentla ·attachment
-3-
fl
(31) DI£TRIGT 1
(32)
(33)
GefiB iaeratioR of mot ioR S:f:lf:'JFOViRg warrafit o 5 if al'ly,'
Bee BUf'f)lemel'ltal ageRaa attaehHleRt
DISTRIC ~~ ~
Oth/P /busines ~communications or supplemental agenda
i ems, if any
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn ~·. '-/ 1
( 3 11 ) DI~TRIGT §
Go11sideration of metieR a13proving warraRto, if B:Ry.
See oupplomontal agenda attaehmcHt
(·35) DISTRIC .'P--~ ~)l er . bu~ii:_i~nd~n-:L.cations or supplemental agenda
--~ .. terns, if any
(36) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn g-. 1-J
(37) DISr:l?HIGr:I? e
Geasidoration ef JB0ti0R apprqving uarranto, if aAy.
£00 oupplemental ageHaa attaehme~~
(38) DISTRICT 6
\, Oth ~!Vb~ce·mmur!.!cations or supplemental
~ms, if any
(39) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn F. <(?
agenda
..._ LETIER .:: ........ -( 4 Q )
A/C •... TKlR -
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of Resolution No. 74-71-11, authorizing
execution of a Quitclaim Deed to Southern California
Edison Company for a portion of District's easement which
is no longer needed due to the relocation of Newland Avenue
.-------·!\\I~ ........_,, ...... ___ _
Force Main. See page "D"
FllE ···-·············
LETTER ___ ....... { 41) . DISTRICT 11
A/C .... TKLR ....
--··--·-y \ ~
-···-·-··-....... , ..
FILE .......... -.. ,..,·.
LETTER ...... ~ •• ,A 2 )
AJC ·-ffiR ""
-------!{\I ~ ___ , ....... _
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1
to th e plans and specifications for Slater Avenue Trunk
Sewer Extension, Contract No. 11-12, authorizing an addition
of $7.-'45.31 to the contract with Kordick & Son, Inc. See
page "E"
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress
report on construction of the Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer
Extension, Contract No. 11-12. See page "F"
(43) DISTRICTS 3 & 11
\
(43) Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants.
1\-J\ 'S See page "II"
(44) DISTRICT 11
.(44) Consideration of motion approving warrants. /\I\ \1S See page "III"
(45) ISTRICT ~
0t 1:.9',.......5usine s ~commun l-~.a~r-supplemental agenda
:t-t-ems, if any
(46) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn g : J.9
-4-
(47)
t'llE ............... ,u••
LETIER ······iflt5
A/~-3~7 ___ ._ ....
(48)
FILE ·--·i_-·f l) ~-------
A/C __ .'00.R ••••
(49)
r\\S
DISTRI CT 3
Consideration of Resolution No . 74-72-3, approving
plans and spec ifications for Imperial Relief Intercepto~
~' Reaches 22 & 23, Contract No. 3-19, and authorizing
the General Manager to establish the bid date upon receipt
of necessary permits from .the State Division of Hig hway s
See page "'G"
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to receive and file Draft Environ-
mental Impact Report for the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5
through 8; directing the filing of Notic e of Completion in
accordance with the Local Guidelines Implementing the
Califor•nia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended;
and establishing June 26, 1974, as the final date for which
all comments must be received on said Environmental Impact
Repor t
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress
report on construction of the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4,
Contract No. 3-1 8. See page "H"
(50) DISTRICT 3
N\ \s< so) Consideration of motion approving warrants.
See page "II"
(51
(52 )
1'·-·-·-··-t5 3 )
LETTER ····-······~ ~c .... tKL~ ~~ \s
-------
DISTRICT=3 ,.......----..._ _
Ot~--1>usines ~d __g,0mm unicat-i-o s or supplemental agenda
:-t-e ms, if any
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn . ~.__s-D
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of Resolution No. 74-73-2, approving
plans and specifications for Carbon Canyon Intercept or
Sewer, Contract No. 2-18, and authorizing advertising for
bids on June 4, 1 974. See page "I"
~ DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 3, FILE ............... _.
LETTER --··--
A/C _,.TKlR ·-
FILE ..... ~
LETTER ............ ..
A/C .... TKLR ... .
to the plans and specifications for the Santa Ana River
Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue,
Contract No. 2-14-1, authorizing an addition of $11,544.00
to the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting Company.
Se e page "J"
DISTRICT 2
Staff report on public hearing conducted by Santa Ana Watershed
Project Authority (SAWPA) on the Santa Ana River Interceptor,
. Reach 3, from La Palma Avenue to the Orange County Line
,._
----.( ... ,'fittj ) DISTRICT 2
FILE ................. .
::e~--~~~··:tif\ l S
-~--
~ ~/
FILE ................ ..
\..EtreR .............. /\/\ / '--
A/C _:n«.R ••. ! ' I ../ ___ . ...,,....
Consideration of motion authorizing payment to Orange
County Flood Control District in the amount of $844.48
for inspection services for the period November, 1973
through January, 1974, in connection with construction of
the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Plant No. 1 to Katella
Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress
report on the construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor
from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contra ct
No. 2-14-1, and the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Katella
Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No. 2-14 ~2. Se e
page "K"
-5-
(60)
FI LE .......... J§l)
LETTER -·····-·····
A/C --.TKl.R ••••
----··l\ri\ s
----.ol .U \
FILE .................. < 62 )
LETTER ···---··-..,.,. '--
A/C __ ,TKLR :--M t '-J
[ r &L V "l
·--
®
FI LE -·-·-·-··-~R .-.. -···-· ri\ \ S
A/C .... TKLR ....
-------·-
Fii.£ ·······-····· .... ( 64)
lETTER .•..•• ':::..--
;;; •••. TKLR ••• \ S ____ _._..
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion approving warrant s .
See page "II"
DISTRICT 2
usirle's and commtlr\ieat ons or supplemental agenda
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn o/:03
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion approving the following Change
Orders to the plans and specifications for Diversion
Structures, Contract No. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-3E-l, and
authorizing changes to the contract with Halopoff & Sons,
Inc. as follows:
Change Order No. 1 -Addition of $1,063.88 See page "L"
Change Order No. 2 -Adjustment of Engineer's quantities
and addition of $690.60 See page "M"
Change Order No. 3 -Time extension of 16 calendar days
See page "N"
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No. 74-74-7, accepting Diversion
Structures, Contract No. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-3E-l,
as complete; authorizing execution of Notice of Completion
upon receipt of letters of compliance from agencies issuing
permits in connection with said contract; and approvin Q,,-,,...,,._<I?
Final Closeout Agreement. See page "O" A..°'72-,
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to receive and file Draft Environ-
mental Impact Report for the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer,
Reaches 10 through 18; directing the filing of N.o..ti.~e--.Q f
Completion in accordance with the Local Guidelines Imp le-
~ -menting the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as
amended; and establishing June 26, 1974, as the final dat e
for which all comments must be received on said Environmental
Impact Report
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 74-75-7 , authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 4.38 acres
of territory to the District in the vicinity of Santiago
Boulevard and Walnut Avenue (Proposed Annexation No. 4 0 -
Tract No. 8266 to County Sanitation District No . 7)
(65 ) DISTRICT 7 .
FILE -····-········•
LETTE R --·-··-
A/C -m.lt \s
Consideration of motion to receive and fil e letter from
James A. and Dorothy G. Moulton requesting anne x ation o f
approximately one acre of territory in the vicinity of
Cowan Heights Drive between Briar Lane and Ran g eview Drive ,
and r e fer to staff for study and recommend a tion . See
pag e "P"
~ (66) DISTRICT 7
LEn ER ············-
A/C _ .. TKLR -··
(a) Staff report on discussion with City o f Orange re g arding
request of Restaurant Adventures, Inc. for sewer service
for a proposed restaurant at the intersection o f
Chapman Avenue and Crawford Canyon Roa d
(b) Consideration of action s
-6-
•
(67) DISTRICT 7
l'ILE .•.... .,,.~ \
. 2"' c.... LETTER ············ ,;/
AfC _ •• TKLR ·-·
Consideration of motion to receive and file claim of
Southern California Gas Company, dated April 24, 1974,
in the amount of $1,740.13~e alleged damages incurred
by construction of the Coll ge Avenue Force Main, and
-·-·-··-·-·-refer to General Counsel for recommendation
-··-·-·-··-4-~ c:~ q 7
(68) DISTRICT 7
\
(68) Consideration of motion approving warrant s .
~'\ ~ See page "III"
(69 ) ~l).!"CT~ ~er bUSirte.s s-~unications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(70) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn t/~;J 5"
' -7-
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
May 8, 1974 -7:30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 74-70
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 70-3, AS AMENDED
(HULES AND HEGULArrIONS RELNI1IVE 'I10
CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT)
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF
DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RULES AND
REGULATIONS RELATIVE TO CONDITIONS OF
EMPLOYMENT, RESOLUTION NO. 70-3, AS AMENDED
* * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Section 16 of Resolution No. 70-3, as amended,
is hereby further amended to read as follows:
"Section 16. Whenever an employee is compelled by
direction of his physician to be absent from duty
on account of injury arising out of and in the
course of his employment, he shall receive full
compensation during the first three (3) calendar
days of such absence. Thereafter, during such
absence he may elect to apply pro-rated accrued
sick leave to such absence and to receive
compensation therefor in an amount equal to the
difference between the compensation to which
he is entitled under the Workmen's Compensation
Act and his regular pay, not to exceed the amount
of his earned sick leave. An employee may also
elect to use any earned vacation time and
equivalent time off for overtime in like manner
after his sick leave is exhausted."
Section 2. That any other resolution or motion or portions
thereof that conflict herewith are hereby repealed and made of no
further effect; and,
Section 3. That this resolution become effective April 1, 1974.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 8, 1974.
AGENDA ITEM #21 -A-ALL DISTRICTS
cou;~JY S.:\:U T,\ TI o:\ DI STJ: I CTS OF OP.J\~:GE cou:~TY
·. P. O. Box 8127 -108-14 Ellis Avenue
fountain Valley, California 92708
Cl IANGE ORDI:R
C.O. NO. 6
;o:~TRACTOR: E.T. I. & Ko rd ick, A Jo int Ven tu re ---------------------DATE May 2 , 197 4
Influent Metering and Diversion Structure
roB: ________ _.:a~t_.R~e_c_1_a~m~a~t~1~·o~n-...P~l~a~n~t-N~T~o •• -=-l __ -~J~o-b--.N_o~·--=I~--8~--3=----------------------------
Amount of this Change .Order. (ADD) ttU~NW~Yi $ ____ 1 __ s .ii..' o __ o __ o ......... o..;..o_
In accordance with contract prov.isions, the following changes in the~
:ontract· and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as cor.tpensation
:hcrefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are
lereby approve~. . . -:·.
Reference: Contractor correspondence dated.
January 14 ·, 1974. Districts ·.
ADD:
correspondence dated.November S, 1973~
Contract Dra~ing No.· G-SA
Rolling gate installed complete with
track, guides, painting for lump sum
price of
Paving 4" AC on 8" AB
12,000 square-feet
I
NO TIME EXTENSION
.·
. .. . .. .... . ......... .
Original Contract Price
Pr~v. Auth. Changes
10,000.00
8,000.~
$ 1,290,000.00
$ 195,679.00
This Change (ADD) (~1() $ 18,000.0r .,_,,_
Hoard authorization date: May s, 1974
By---------------------·--~-------Cons ult 1ng bng1neer
By ______________________ ,~~----:---
C on tractor
AGENDA rrEM // 2 l!
Amended Contract Price <: 1,503,679.00
""
:-B-.
Approved:
COUNTY SJ\NITATIOH DISTRICTS of
Orange County, ·California
By
----------------------c~h-1-e~-r--E_n_g_1_n_e_(
ALL DISTHICTS
PROGRESS REPORT
TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
I-8-3 -INFLUENT METERING AND DIVERSION STRUCTURE -($1,503,679.00)
INFLUENT CHANNEL: . Complete.
INFLUENT PIPING: Euclid and Sunflower Trunk bypasses in service. Completed
junction structures on Newhope-Placentia and District No. 1 trunk lines.
Interplant Influent Interceptor, Ellis Force Main, Newhope-Placentia, and
Sunflower Trunks have been connected to structure.
METERING AND DIVERSION STRUCTURE: Underground structure complete. Installing
equipment and completing meter installation. Installing electrical trays
and wiring. Hanging lights. Power service to structure complete. Completed
control building---finishing walls.
Contract approximately 85 percent complete to date.
J-13 -SHOPS AND WAREHOUSE FACILITIES -($1,061,989)
SHOP A: Installing plumbing and electrical fixtures. Installing mechanical
equipment. Painting. Bridge crane installed.
SHOP B: Installing plumbing and electrical fixtures. Installing mechanical
equipment. Painting. Erecting dust collection system. Wood block floor.
complete. Bridge cranes installed.
WAREHOUSE: Installing heating, plumbing and electrical fixtures. Painting.
SITE: Paving, curbs, gut~ers and fence complete. Grading frontage.
Contract approximately 93 percent .complete to date.
P2-20 -POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT PLANT NO. 2 -($158,294)
No further onsite work is expected until sufficient equipment has been
delivered to complete peripheral lighting and control installations. .
Unit substation delivery not expected before July.
Contract approximately 58 percent complete to date.
AGENDJ\ ITEM #26 C-1 ALL DISTRICTS
Progress Report
Treatment Plant Projects
Page Two
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
108.C"' ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71'4) 5"0-2910
(71 "') 962-241 1
P2-21 -DIGESTERS "N" AND "0" AT PLANT NO. 2 -($1,076,514)
DIGESTERS "N" AND "0": Installing piping and equipment on digesters.
DIGESTER CONTROL BUILDING: Installing piping, electrical switchgear and
sludge recirculation pumps and heat exchangers.
TUNNELS: Installing piping.
DIGESTER GAS CmtPRESSORS: Completing piping. Electrification to be installed
on temporary basis until Job No. ~2-20 is complete.
STOru.t WATER PUMP STATION: Structurally complete. _Having difficulty with
. -·.'" pwnp deli very.
PAVING: Paving underway.
Contract approximately 86 percent complete to date.
TREATMENT PLANT WORK
Total Value Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Total Work During April
Total Work Bid in April
Total Work Under Design
DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK
Total Value Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Total Work During April
Total Work Under Design
$ 3,800,476
3,240,390
246,379
29,879,000
800,000
$21,975' 119
15,977,723
1,071,640
21,281,200
TOTAL Ai\10UNT UNDER CONTRACT & DESIGN
May 2, 1974
AGENDA ITEM #26 C-2
$ 3,800,476
29,879,000
800,000
$21, 975J119
21,281,200
$77,735,795
ALL DISTRICTS
RESOLUTION NO. 74-71-11
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF QUITCLAIM DEED
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF QUITCLAIM DEED TO SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY RE RELOCATION
OF NEWLAND AVENUE FORCE MAIN
* * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Quitclaim Deed for a portion of
existing District easement, dated May 8, 1974, from County Sanitation
District No. 11 to Southern California Edison Company, be approved;
and,
Section 2. That the real property to be quitclaimed as
provided for in that certain agreement dated December 9, 1971, by
and between County Sanitation District No. 11 and Southern California
Edison Company is more particularly described and shown on Exhibit "A"
and Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman of the District be authorized
and directed to execute said Quitclaim Deed, quitclaiming the
District's interest in the certain real property hereinabove described.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 8, 1974.
AGENDA ITEM #40 -D-· DISTRICT 11
cou:nY SA:HTATio:.; DISTl~ICTS OF OP..1\::GE cou::r.Y
P. o. Box 8127 -lO<l·l·l Ellis ,\venue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE OlWf:.R
C.O. NO. 1
CONTRACTOR: Kordick and Son, Inc. DATE --~M-a-y--2-,--1-9-7-4-------
JOB: Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension, Contract No. 11-12
$ 745.31 Amount of this Change Order.{ADD) ~ -----
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in th~
contract ~nd/or contract work are l1ercby authorized and as compensation
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the cont~act price are
hereby approved. ! .. . . . .
Relocate conflicti~g ~til~ty at
Station 43+34
NO TIME EXTENSION
\.
' .
..
.·
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Change (ADD) (Dfil)!J~
Amended Contract Price
$ 419,000.50
$ 0.00
$ 745.31
""' $ 419,745.81
Hoard authorization date: May 8, 1974 Approved:
COUNTY SJ\NITATIO!~ DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By------------~----~-----..----~-Cons ul ting Engineer
By ____________________ __,~-.---~-
Con tractor
;., f --------------------~c~1~1~1-e:?f __ c_n_g~1~n~c
AGENDA ITEM #Lti -E-DISTRICT·ll
M E M 0 R A N D U M
May 2, 1974
TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager
FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
SUBJECT: Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension
Contract No. 11-12
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108-44' ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714') 540-2910
(714') 962-2'411
To date, all pipe has been placed. Presently, the junction
structures at Nichols and Slater and Gothard and Slater Streets
are under construction.
Base course paving completed with the exception of a small area
between the junction structures. Final paving, ·the completion of
the junction structures and one manhole remain on the contract.
All work estimated tq be completed by May l?th.
REL:BEW:ss
AGENDA ITEM #42 -F-DISTRICT 11
_____ ! ~ I W 1 ___ v_t _A _R N_E_R ___ I LJ ~ I LJ LJ I AVE N uE I l __ I l_
~ ,.
DD I . ._ DD 011
~ ~~ ~ ODD_ u_
~ ~ D ___ I -
.
0::
0 DI
er.:
<t
:r: .._
0
(!)
:r.: u
<!
w
CJ
I
ol
z
<l:
....I
wl
zl
TALBERT m
iJ
______ A_v_E N~ ,--i Ir=
(
-N-
J.15 MILES OF 42''PIPE
CONTRACT AWARDED I· 9-74
COST #4J9,000
SC~EDULED FOR COMPLE.TlON
lo-18·14
CONTRACT 11-12 SLATER AVENUE TRUNK SEWER EXTENSION
---COMPLETE
teeeeeeTO BE CONSTRUCTED
RESOLUTION NO. 74-72-3
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR CONTRACT NO. 3-19
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IMPERIAL
RELIEF INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACHES 22 &
23, CONTRACT NO. 3-19
* * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of Cou~ty Sanitation District No. 3
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and
contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by
Boyle Engineering Corporation, District's engineers, for construction
of the IMPERIAL RELIEF INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACHES 22 & 23, CONTRACT
NO. 3-19, are hereby approved and adopted; ar.d,
Section 2. That the General Manager be authorized to estaqlish
the bid date upon receipt of necessary permits from the State Division
of Highways; and,
Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to
advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the
Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's
Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of
Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting ·held May 8, 1974.
AGENDA ITEM #47 -G-DISTRICT 3 .
M E M 0 R A N D U M
May 2, 1974
TO: Fred A. Harper, General Mariager
FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
SUBJECT: Knott Interceptor, Contract No. 3-18
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108'44' ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714') 5'40-2910
(714') 962-2411
Work to date extends to 300 feet east of Hoover and Balsa Avenues.
Contractor placing 500 feet of 96'' RCP a week. Base course
paving completed to 800 feet west. of Beach Boulevard. All. curb, gutter
and base course paving on Balsa Avenue east of Beac.h Boulevard
completed.
Contractor presently completing internal pipe work at Newland and
Bolsa to facilitate the activation of our Balsa Avenue Relief
Sewer early this month.
REL :BEW: SS
AGENDA ITEM #49 -H-DISTRIC'r 3
J
( (
---, I
---· COM l~Lf1f
• O e e e lo B~ CDNST~Oc.T~D
(
----...A~\/c. _____ I _I
.-L ________ _,
COUNiY
OF
ORAN6;-
RESOLUTION NO. 74-73-2
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
CONTRACT NO. 2-18
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CARBON
CANYON INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT
NO. 2-18
* * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and
contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors
by Lowry & Associates, District's engineers, for construction of
the CARBON CANYON INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO.· 2-18, are hereby
approved and adopted; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to
advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the
Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and,
Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m.,
June 4, 1974, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and
read; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's
Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of
Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 8, 1974.
AGENDA rrrEM #53 -I-DISTRICT 2
cou;ny SA:HTATIO:~ lJISTi:ICTS OF Qp_,\::GE cou:;ry
P. O. Box 3127 -10<l-l4 Ellis ,\venue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE OIU>ER
C.O. NO. 13
CONTRACTOR: Sullv-Mi Iler Contracting Company ----------~------~-DATE May 2, 1974
JOB: Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Ave., Contract ~0 1 2-1~-l
~ount of this Change Or~er. (ADD) (~~n'Ul!l) $ 11,544.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in th~
c.ontract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as cor:ipensation
therefor, the following additions to or dc<luciions from the cont~act price are
hereby approved. . ..•..
. ' .
As provided in Section 115 of the Specifications·
and Addendum No. 3, the first additional "foot of
rock is at a unit price of $7.50/C.Y. and the
next foot at $9.00/C.Y.
962 Cubic Yards @ $7.50 =
481 Cubic Yards @ $9.00 =
I
. "
$7,215.00
. 4,329.00
:
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
$ 6,274,608.40
$ 1,548,574.32
This Change (ADD)(~~~~ $ 11,544.eO --------~--~
Hoard authorization date:
May 8, 1974
By----------------------~--r--------Co nsu l t 1 ng Engineer
By----------------------,..--~~~~ Contractor
AGENDA rrEM #54
Amended Contract Price $ 7,834,726.72
... J-
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATIO!J DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By ______________________ C~h-1-e~-f__,E~n-g1n;
MEMORANDUM
May 2, 1974
TO: Fred A. Harper, General. Manager
FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
SUBJEct: Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contracts Nos. 2-14-1 & 2-14~2
2-14-1
Surface restoration completed. Remaining work involves plastic pipe .liner
welding and testing. Estimated completion date is May 31, 1974.
Pipe laying operations progressing very well. Completed work includes two
sections of pipe: a section from Katella Avenue north for 2400 feet and a
section from 1800 feet south to 1600 feet north of Glassell Avenue. Contractor
has placed one-fourth of the total pipe footage. ·
Tunnel work at Glassel! Avenue continues as contractor removes and rejacks
previously misplaced pipe. The Riverside Freeway tunnel crossing is presently
underway and if run on a 24 hour schedule will be completed within 30 days.
REL:BEW:ss
AGENDA ITEM #57 -K-DISTRICT 2
/
Lru ::-N 0
•
1 ··~·iiiliiiiil CoMPLf1f
eeeee 1"0 e~ CON51RIJCTe=-D
. . , cou;ay SA:UTAT Io:~ lJI STl: I CTS OF OP"'\::GE c.ou:;ry
P. O. Box ·3121 -10a~4 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE OlWER
C.O. NO. ·1
CO!~TRACTOR: Halopoff & Sons, Inc. DATE ---~-ta_y __ z-,--1-9-74----~-
JOB: Diversion ·Facilities, Contract 7-3A-1, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-1, 7--3E-l
. Amount of this Change Order. (ADD) (llXNN~I) $ 1,063.88
...., In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the.
contract and/or contract work are 11ereby authorized and as co~pensation
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the cont~act price are
hereby approved. ~·.
' ..
Reference: .. Contractor's invoice dated
April 26 ,-197~.
·ADD:
ADD:
For removal and disposal of abandoned
concrete lined and coated water line
between Station 38+75 and 39+25 on
Newport Boulevard
Correct original"contract amount to
correspond with contractor's ·
.·extensions of unit prices
TOTAL ADD:
,·
*This figure will not be incl~ded under Chang~
. Order No. 1 on the Progress Payment.
. .. .. . .... .. .. .. ~--
.·
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
$909.88
154.00*"
$1,063.88
$ 25,978.40
$ 0 00
This Change (ADD) ~-cnt) $ 1, 063. 8~
Board a\!thorization date:
May 8, 1974
By ________ ~--~~--~---~--~~~ Consulting Engineer
By--------------------~~~-::--=~ Contractor
AG ENDA rrEM # 61
Amended Contract Price s 27,042.28
:-L-
Approved:
COU~TY SANITATIO!J DISTRICTS of
Orange County,· California
By--------------------~rr----"!'"~---~ Clnel Eng inE;
DISTRIC'l' 7
cou;ny SA:HT1\TIO:.~ DISTI:ICTS or OP"'\::GE cou::ry
P. O. Box 3127 -108-14 Ellis ,\venue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CJIA~GE OllDER
C.O. NO. 2
CONTRACTOR: Halopoff & Sons, Inc. DATE --.....M~a-y---2-,-1~9~7~4~----~
JOB: Diversion Facilities, Contract 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-.3E-1
Amount of this Change Order. (ADD) (DEUUOlX) $ 690. 60
.._,. In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the
contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as co~pensation
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are
hereby approved. . .. . . .
ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES
ADD:
Item ·Change Est'd Quantities
No. Unit From To Difference
1 L.F. 386 387
2 L.F. 258 260
3 L.F. . 82 ·s3
11· Each l s
L.-UCT: .
9 L.F. 154 . . 128
10 Each 1 0
12 C.Y. 10 0
-.. ... .. .-~--....
~
Hoard authorization date:
May 8, 1974
By------------~~--"'T"'!"--~~~~~ Consulting Engineer
By--------------------~~~-::-:-=-::-C on tractor
AGENDA rrEM #61
1 @ 21. 00/L. F. . 21.00
2 @ 2.1. 30/L. F. 42.60
1 @ 2~.00/L.F. 23.00
4 @ 375. OO/Each . 1,500.00
·• Total Add: . 1,586.60
26 @ 8.50/L.F. 221.00
,. 1 @ 325.00/Each. 325.00
10 @ 35.00/C.Y. 350.00
Total Deduct: 896.00
TOTAL ADD: 690.60
Original Contract Price $ 25,978.40
Prev. Au th. Changes $ 1,063.88
This Change (ADD) (DIDU.~i) $ 690.60
Amended Contract Price $ 27,732.88
.-M-
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, ·california
By----------------~--~r----:-~~ # Chie·t EngiTiC
DISTRICT 2
cou;ny SA:UTATIO:~ DISTl~IC:TS OF O?.A::GE cou::TY
P. o. Box 3127 -10a~4 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CJIA:iGE OlWER
C. 0. :\O. 3
:ONTRACTOR: Halopoff & Sons, Inc. DATE --~Ma---y--2-,-1-9~7~4-----------
JOB:Diversion Facilities, Contract 7-3A-1, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-3E-l
~ount of this Change Order. ~'O.~ ~ $ 0.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in th.e '-"'
:ontract and/or contract work are 11ereby authorized and as cocpensation
~herefor, the following additions to or deductions from the cont~act price are
iereby approved. • ..
...
Extension of Contract Time
The·contractor is hereby granted an
.. ext.ension of time due to delay py
the Orange County Road Department in issuing.an excavation permit.
Work performed under Change Order
No. 1
15 Calendar Days
1 Calendar Days
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION 16 Calendar Days
Summary of Contract Time
Original Contract Date
O~iginal Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Total Time Extension
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
-~.-. ..... -
:Board authorization date:
..
.·
....
Original Contract Price
Prev. Au th. Changes
February 28, 1974
45 Calendar Day~
April 14, 1974
16 Calendar Days
61 Calendar Days
April 30, 1974
$ 25z978.40
$ 1,764.48
This Change ~X}jJJ~ XIlLDlJ~ $ 0.00 "-"'
Amended Contract Price $ 27,732.88
Approved:
May 8, 1974 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS cf
Orange County, California
By----------------------~-----.-----Cons ult ing Engineer
By _____________________ __,~~~~~
Lon tractor
By------------------~----,.,------~ Clue-£ Eng inc(
AGENDA I'J1EM //61 • -N·-
RESOLUTION NO. 74-74-7
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2,
7-38-1, 7-3E-l·AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ACCEPTING
CONTRACT NO. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l,
7-3E-l AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL
CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Halopoff & Sons, Inc., has
completed construction in accordance with the terms of the contract
for DIVERSION STRUCTURES, CONTRACT NO. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-3E-l,
on the 30th of April, 1974; and,
Section 2. That by letter, Boyle Engineering Corporation,
District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as
having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has con-
curred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation
is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That the Diversion Structures, Contract No. 7-3A-l,
7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-3E-l, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance
with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 28th of February,
1974; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized
and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Halopoff &
Sons, Inc. setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of
said Diversion Structures, Contract No. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-3E-l,
is hereby approved; and,
Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of
Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement
on behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 8, 1974.
AGENDA ITEM #62 -0-DISTRICT 7
Board of Directors
~an1tat1on District No. 7
Orange County
Santa Ana, California
1082 St. rtegis Place
banta ruia, Cal11ornia 92705
April 10, 1974
·it is hereby requested that the property described as Lot 33 of
Tract No. 3021, in the county of Orange, State of California,
as per map recorded in book 92, pages 5 through 9 inclusive o.f
l·liscellc..neous l·~aps, in the office of the county recorder of
Orange County be annexed to Orange County Sanitation District
No. 7. A map of this property is enclosed •. I understand District
7 will complete the legal description. An existing boundary of
the sanitation distric~ is adjacent to the southerly property
line of' this lot. Refer to the Lilje blad-\'iessinger annexation,
April 1969.
The area of this lot was calculated from the dimensions recorded
on the tract map as filed with the county and reproduced herein.
Tne irregular shape of the lot was divided into three oblique
triangles, 1, 2, and 3; plus a sector of a circle~ 4. All cal-
culations use basic trigonometry, and are presented in the order
performed. The results are as follows:
Area 1 12,078 Square feet
2 14,857 1t "
3 13,032 " " 4 222 ti It
Total -40,199 II JI
:: 0.923 acres
Owners of the sole p~cperty for which a!lnexation is requested:
Ja.nes A. & Dorothv G. :i1·ioulton, joint ten;:.:...!lts
1032 ~t. Hegis Pl~ce
.:>·1nt•3. ~ins., Gal1I'"'ornie.. 927J5
Talephone: 544-3685
~ copy of the Joint Tenancy Grant Deed is enclosed.
Assessed value or the property involved: ~4250 according to the
current tax bill (July 1, 1973-June 30, 1974). Assessors parcel
/1503-302-0 1+.
No vot9rs now reside upon the ?roperty ~ro~osed for a!~1ex~tion.
~::..-iclos~d is ;..:. cl10c:·: i:i t~~ 9.n:>u.:1.t o:' -)325.JJ to cov9r ·:!istrict
p~ocassi~~ cos~~.
).
Dorothy G. Moulton
~nclosures:
1) ~-~~p
2) Ce:.lculation ol area ( 4 S!l~ete)
:; ) vOP.., v--a -... J.Jeed
4) C.i:1ecl: 1or ·lf· 325. 00·
AGENDA ITEM #65 -P-DISTRICT 7
...
Agenda
H. G. OSBORNE
CHIEF ENGINEER
ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
400 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST
BANTA ANA, CALIF"ORNIA
.;2-//-/-/
MAILING ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE: 834-2300
AREA CODE 714
April 29, 1974
Orange County Sanitation District No. 2
P. o. Box 127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
INVOICE
P. 0. BOX 1078
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702
F"ILE No. EOl. 30
Costs incurred by the flood control district for inspection per
the terms of District Permit No._ 15171, dated March 21, 1972,
for the months of November, 1973 through January, 1974.
MAINTENANCE DIVISION:
G. Evans 6 7 hrs. @ 7. ll $476.37
Overhead @ 60.9% 290.ll
Equipment rental 78 hrs. @ 1.00 78.00
TOTAL COST $844.48
Please make your check payable to Orange County Flood Control
District.
Approved for payment
Engineer
II
eo Anos OF o ::;t::crons
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange Cou nty, Californ ia
JOINT BOARDS
SUPPLEMEN TAL AGENDA ITE MS
MAY 8, 197 4 -7:30 P.M.
ALL DISTRICTS
Post Office Box S 127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 9 2 708
T elephones:
Area Code 7 1 4
540-2910
962-24 11
AGENDA
(2 8) Consi deration of roll call vote motion approving Joint
Op e r at i ng and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund wa rrant books
for signature 9 f the Chairma n of District No . 1, a nd
authorizing payment of cla ims l isted on page "I"
(2 9a ) Consideration of Resolution No. 74-76 , authorizing filin g
.; applicat i on for Fe deral and State grants for publicly -ow n e d
wastewater treatment work s a nd providing c ertain assurances
S ee page "IV"
(29b) Co n side r ation of Resolution No . 74-77 , endorsing t he Clean
Wa ter Bond Act o f 1974 (Propos·i t ion 2) See page "V"
DISTRIC TS 3 & 11
(4 3 ) Consideration of motion approvirig suspense fund warrants .
See .page "II "
DISTRICT 11
(44) Consideration of motion approving warrant s .
See page "I II"·· ·
DI STRICT 3
(5 0) Consideration of motion approvin g warrants .
See page "II "
DIST RICT 2
"(58) Consi de ration of motion approving warrants.
See page II II II
DISTRICT 7
(68) Con s ide r a tion o f motion a pprov i n g w a rran~s .
See p age II I II "
WARRANT NO.
2 280 5
2 2806
22 8 07
228 08
22809
22810
22811
22812
22813
22814
22815
22816
22817
22818
22819
22820
22821
22822
22823
22824
22825
22 8 26
22827
22 82 8
22829
2 2830
2283 1·
2283 2
22833
2 283L~
22835
22 836
22 83 7
22838
22839
228 40
2 28 L~1
228 42
2 284 3
2 28 44
228 4.5
228 46
228 47
22848
2 2849
22850
22851
22852
22853
22854
22855
22856
228 57
22858
22859
2286 0
22861
22862
22863
22864
22865
22866
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Air Conditioning Supply Co., Freight
All Bea ring S e r vi ce , Inc., Be arings & Pipe Supplies
Americ a n Kl e aner Mf g . Co., Inc., Valve
American Pneumatic Tool Co., Machine Equipment
American So ciety for Testing & Materials, Technical
Manuals
City of Anaheim, Power
Anaheim Truc k & Tra n s fer, Freight
The Anchor Packing Co., Gaskets
Apco Suppl y , Hardwa re
Aquatic Ce nter, Sa f e t y Supplies
Associated Concrete Products, Inc., Manhole Sections
Azusa Western, Concre te
Bank of Ame rica, Bo nd & Coupon Collection
Banning Ba ttery Co., Batteri e s
Beckman Instruments, Inc., Cable
Bell Pipe & Supply Co., Pump & Valves
Bend e r Mac hine, Inc ., Engine Re p air
Blower-Pape r Co., Janito rial & Maintenance Supplies
AMOU NT
33.50
872 . 39
11.82
l, 168 J'~
35. 75
28.7 3
6.6 4
9.26
6 .15
10.00
57.24
293.25
138.45
261.83
80.14
44 3 .93
732.66
Bomar Magn eto Service, Inc., Engine Parts & Magneto Repair
Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employm~nt Exams
Broadlick Art Supply, Certificate Framing
197-58
389 .~.4
39.00
32.70
28.22 Bruning Divi s ion, Dr a f t ing Sup plie s
C & R Re c on d itioning Co., En g ine Re pair & Pump Parts
CWPCA, Ann u a l Co n fere n c e Expe n se
Cal's Ca meras , Ph oto Suppli es
Cal Sta t e Sea l Co., Fla n ge Gaske t s
Califo rni a Co lla t o r Sa l es , ·Binding Supplies
Le onard Ca rne y, CWPCA Confe r e n ce Expense
695.00
208 .00
37.08
78.1 3
56 .16
John Ca r o llo En g inee r s , En g inee ring Service s (MO 4-10 -74)
Chica g o Pneuma tic Too l Co., Co mpres sor Pa r t s
79 .7 f)
5, 0 21.
L~05 .05
32.86
271.60
34.98
1,269 .28
575. l L~
22.36
255.68
Willia m N. Clarke, CWP CA Con fere n ce Expense
College Lu mbe r Co ., Inc., Bu ild ing Ma te rial s & Hardware
Con c r e t e Ti e, Building Ma terial s
Co n so lidated El ec tric Distr., Electric Supplies
F. B •. Coo k Co r p ., Bu lkhea d Remo va l
Copel a nd Moto r s , Inc., Truck Pa rt s
Costa Mesa Auto Parts , Inc., Tru c k Parts
Co s ta Mesa Co un ty Water Di stri c t .
Mr . Cra n e , Cran e Renta l
Cres t Leasi ng, Leased Ve hicle -4 Month s
Crow n Control s , Inc ., El e ctric Ca ble
Curtin Mat h eson Sc i entific, Inc., La b Supplies
Deaver Manufac turin g Co ., Truc k Repa ir
J ohn M. Deck , Equipme n t Pa r ts
Di amon d Core Drill i ng Co ., Con cre t e Saw ing
Duc ommu n Me t a l s & Su pp l y Co ., Stee l
Dunn-Edwa r ds Co r p ., Pa i nt Supp lies
Eastman , I nc ., Office Su pplies
En chanter , I n c ., Ocean ographic Se rvic es (MO 2 -13-7 4)
Enginee r s Sa l es Se rvice Co., Inc ., Pump Part s
En s i g n Products Co ., Fre i ght
Enterprise Pri nt i n g , Pri nt i ng Supp lies & Print ing
Fischer & Port er Co ., Meterin g Equipment & Training
Clifford A. Forkert, Construction Survey PW -033
City of Fountain Vall ey , Water
Wil liam H. Fox, Employee Mil eage & CWPCA Co n fe r ence
Freeway Machin e & Welding Shop , Mac h ining
Larry Fricke r Co ., Inc ., Weed Kil l e r
Gar-Wood L .A. Truclc Equ i p ., Inc., Truck Equi p me n t
Garde n Grove Lumber & Ceme n t, Bu i lding Ma te ria l
Ga s k et Manufact uring Co ., Gaskets
Genera l Elect r ic Suppl y Co ., El e ctri c Supp lies
I-1
6.oo
407 .69
586 . 34
16 5.33
8 69 .52
10 5 .00
51.4.2
4 5 .00
175 .1 5
22 .00
6 20 .87
3 ,200 .00
1 38 .86
17.1 5
11 3 .88
1 ,1 25.92
826 .0
40 .CJD
Expense 66 .85
1,033 .50
11 0 .25
83 .21
172 .99
68 .58
1,050 .72
WARRANT NO.
22867
22868
22869
22870
22871
...,872
~873
22874
22875
22876
22877
22878
22879
22880
22881
22882
22883
22884
22885
22886
22887
22888
22889
22890
22891
22892
22893
22894
22895
1"''°)896
-.t897
22898
22899
22900
22901
22902
22903
22904
22905
22906
22907
22908
22909
22910
22911
22912
22913
22914
22915
22916
22917
22918
22919
~~920
'-"921
22922
22923
22921.~
22925
22926
22927
22928
22929
IN FAVOR OF .AMOUNT
General Telephone $ 2,738.65
Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine Contract 1-1-73 4,014.64
Golden West Fertilizer Co., Grit Removal 1,128.00
Graybar Electric Co., Electric Supplies & Hardware 157.07
Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Repair 23.69
Hach Chemical Co., Inc., Chemicals 123.94
Halsted & Hoggan, Inc., Pump Parts 158.47
Allan Hancock Foundation, Technical Manuals 41.74
Fred A. Harper, Various Mtg., COD & Conference Expenses 270.17
Harrisons & Crosfield, Inc., Chemical Coagulants 689.0J
Heathkit Electronic Center, Communication Equipment 105.95
L. Heitman Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Rental 1,453.50
Hercules, Inc., Chemical Coagulants 315.88
Hertz Car Leasing Division, Leased Vehicles 572.96
Hewlett Packard Co., Equipment Repair 67.50
James E. Hoagland Co. & Hoagland Engineering Co., Equip.
Rental & Piping 1,416.69
Honeywell, Inc., Telemetering Supplies 221.03
House of Trophies, Director's Plaque 25.21
Howard Supply Co., Pipe Supplies, Boiler Parts & Valves 3,833.36
Hundley Company, Inc., Electronic Equipment & Controls 369.57
City of Huntington Beach, Water 23.59
Huntington Beach Equipment Rentals, Equipment. Rental 574.63
Huntington Laboratories, Inc., Lab Supplies 32.25
Industrial Asphalt, Asphalt 10.29
Ingersol-Rand, Compressor Parts 281.53
Inland Nut & Bolt Co., Hardware 520.86
International Harvester Co., Truck Parts 33.55
Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies & Fittings 284.91
Kilsby Tubesupply Co., Steel 63.32
Kleen Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies 360e67
Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware & Tools 415.94
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Equip. Parts & Hardware 1,510.46
L & N Uniform, Uniform Services -2 Months !~, 405.48
Lacal Company, Inc., Lubricant 24.68
Lance Engine Services, Inc., EquipmGnt Parts . 705.78
Kris Lindstrom, Employee Mileage & CWPCA Conference Expense 102.08
R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., Paving Materials 68.90
McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Hardware 6C> .91
Marine Biological Consultants, Inc., Ocean Research &
Monitoring (MO 11-14-73) 4 .. 904.37
Missimers, Inc., Hardware 239. 22
Moore Products Co., Compressor Parts 44.17
Morrison Co., Check Valves 67 5. 36
National Chemsearch, Solvent & Cleaner 1,086.75
National Fire Protection Association, Manuals 3.93
National Lumber & Supply, Inc., Building Materials 99.19
Nates Saw & Lawnmower Shop, Saw Sharpening 14.70
City of Newport Beach, Water ~88.92
C. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel Retainer eo~.00
OFCCO Construction Co., Inc., Boiler Repair 248.21
Office Equipment Co., Equipment Repair 18.oo
Orange County Stamp Co., Rubber Stamps . 21. ·76
Osterbauer Compressor Service, Compressor Parts 102.75
Pacific Telephone 462.41
Norman Parsons, Employee Mileage 15.75
M. C. Patten & Co., Inc., Control Repair & Steam Traps 309.63
Jose Pena, Weed Removal 308.0J
Philadelphia Gear Corp., Pump Gear E-067 (MO 5·-2-73) 7 ~ 372 ~ 30
Postmaster 500cOC>
Lee Potter Comp~ny, Inc., Maintenance Supplies 195.78
Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage 38.lC>
Rapid Color, Inc., Printing 249.74
Red's Frame & Wheel, 'rruck Repair 25 .13
The Republic Supply Co. of Calif., Hardware 76.60
I-2
WAHRJ\N'r NO.
22930
22931
22932
2.2933
22934
22935
22936
22937.
22938
22939
22940
22941
22942
22943
22944
22945
22946
22947
22948
22949
22950
22951
22952
22953
22954
22955
22956
22957
. 22958
22959
22960
22961
22962
22963
22961+
22965
22966
22967
22968
22969
22970
22971
22972
IN FAVOR OF
Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Parts & Freight $
Royal Plumbin~ & Heating Co., Lateral Repair
San Jose Hyatt House, CWPCA Conference Expense
Santa Ana Blueprint Co., Printing
Santa Ana Engraving Co., Printing Supplies
Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Chemicals
Scientific Products, Lab Supplies
Scott Refrigeration Service, Inc., Air Cond. System Repair
City of Seal Beach, Water
Richard J. Shaffer, Warehouse & Purchasing Study
Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies
Signal Flash Co., Barricade Rental
Fred Sinasek, Employee Mileage
Singer Business Machines, Maintenance Agreement
South Orange Supply, Piping Supplies
Southern Calif. Edison
Southern Calif. Gas Co.
Southern Calif. Water Co.
Sparkletts Drinking Water Co., Bottled Water
Speed-E Auto Parts, Trudk Parts
Standard Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline
Sully Miller Contracting Co., Backfill Material
Surveyors Service Co., Survey Supplies
J. Wayne Sylvester, CASA Meeting Expense
Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage & Supplies Reimbursement
Taylor-Dunn, Equipment Parts .
Technical Book Co., Technical Manual
Techni-Tool, Inc., Tools
John Thomas, CWPC.A Conference Expense
Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Steel
U. S. Equipment Co., Inc., Compressor Parts
Union Oil Co. of Califo, Gasoline & Services
United Auto Parts, Truck Parts
United Reprographics, Inc., Printing
Utility Body Co., Truck Parts
Valve & Primer Corp., Valves
John R. Waples R.S., Odor Consultant
Warren & Bailey Co., Inc., Fittings
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc., Engine Parts
West Print, Printing
Wilson Engine & Equipment Co., Engine Parts
Russell Wold, Employee Mileage
Xe1~x Corp., Reproduction Services
/\MOIDJT
1,116.22
48.00
252.11
89.37
7 .95
54 J"
54.~·
110.16
20.29
400.00
1,987.33
334.3~
47.58
32.75
68.50
35,7J.i5.37
1,290.17
3.00
90.72
284.51
3,645.68
44.77
28.78
33.51
176.15
119.79
19.61
120.81
46.60
3,281.08
~(6. r--..
6.~
369.85
50.35
84.57
186.56
218.20
73.56
47.26
58.60
232.72
123.48
1, 04 5 .1i9
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING $ 122,540.52
I-3
WARRANT NO.
22973
22974
22975
976
~977
22978
22979
22980
22981
22982
22983
22984
22985
22986
22987
22988
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING F'ITTID WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Almquist Tool & Equipment Co., Tools $
Tommy Ayres Chevrolet, New Trucks (MO 2-13-74)
AMOUNT
621.27
5, 704 .92
26,176.68 John Carollo Engrs., Engineering -Plant Construction
Constructors Supply Co., Tools
Decorating Trends Int 1 1., Window Blinds
E.T.I. & Kordick, Contractor I-8-3
E.T.I. & Kordick, Retention Release Contractor P2-ll-l
Hemisphere Constructors, Contractor P2-21
Joe Kay Design & Construction Co., Retention Release
Contractor PW-034
LBWS, Inc., Welding Machine
Motorola, Inc., Communication Equipment
J. Ray Construction Co., Contractor J-13
SSP Truck Equipment, Inc., Truck Bodies
Twining Laboratories, Compaction Tests J-13
United Reprographics, Inc., Plans & Specs Pl-16
Ziebarth & Ziebarth & Alper, Retention Release J-4-1
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF
I-4
337.33
200.56
54,900.00
63,302.40
53,420.65
685.20
813.38
1,460.55
138,058.57
1,802.00
200.00
3,137.60
37,413.35
$ 388,234.46
$ 510,774.98
DIS'rRICT NO. 2
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
22989
22990
City of Anaheim, Facility Relocation 2-14-2 $
AMOUNT
1,731.89
871.82
161.25
1,758.or
470,202.3'-"
22991
22992
22993
22994
22995
22996
22997
22998
22999
23000
23001
23002
23003
23004
Clean Water Corisulta.nts, Engineering Service Ana.helm
Forebay Project Phase II
County of Orange, Compaction Testing 2-14-1 and 2-14-2
Epimenia Diaz and Miguel Gomez, Easement 2-14-1
Kasler Corporation & L.H. Woods & Sons, Contractor 2-14-2
Lowry and Associates, Engineering Service 2-14-3 & 2-15,
Construction Survey 2-14-1 & 2-14-2 .
Orange County Flood Control District, Inspection 2-14-1
Safeco Title Insurance, Easement 2-14-1
Sully.Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 2-14-1
Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Inspection 2-14-2
DISTRICT NO. 3
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
C. Arthur Nissan, Legal Services Amercoat Suit
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Service 3-19, 3-20-1,
3-20-2, 3-20-3, Construction Survey 3-18, Design
Survey 3-20-1, 3-20-2
Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Inspection 3-18
A.G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N.M. Saliba, Contractor 3-18
DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11
SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
J. F. Shea. Company, Inc., Contractor 3-17
County of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-17
II
$
$
14,619.75
844.48
15.00
74,7.58.53
1,785.00
566,748.02
300.00
45,647.~
2,080.00
428,068.80
475,796.30
476,096.30
318,972.64
69.71
$ 319,042.35
nr:~TfUCT NO. 7
FACILITIES ImVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOH OF
23005
23006
23007
23008
23009
23010
23011
Boyle EngineerinB, Preliminary Engineering 7-6-5
Halopoff and Sons, Inc., Contractor 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2,
'l-3B-l, 7-3E-l
DISTRICT NO. 11
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
County of Orange, Compaction Testing 11-12
Huntington Capital Corporation, Refund Annexation Fees
Kordick and Son, Inc., Contractor 11-12
Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Inspection 11-12
Twining Laboratories, Compaction Testing 11-12
III
$
$
Af.l()lJlf J'
lQ0.59
2,'l72. 00
73,650.81
312.00
8L~4. 50
RESOLUTION NO. 74-76
AUTHORIZING FILING APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL
AND STATE GRANTS FOR PUBLICLY-OWNED
WASTEWATER TREATMENT WORKS AND PROVIDING
CERTAIN ASSURANCES
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING FILING APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL
AND STATE GRANTS FOR PUBLICLY-OWNED WASTEWATER
TREATMENT WORKS AND PROVIDING CERTAIN ASSURANCES
* * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the General Manager is hereby authorized and
directed to sign and file, for and on behalf of Cou~ty Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
an Application for Federal Assistance under the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) and any
agreements or other documents necessary to secure and receive a
grant under said act and a state grant under the Clean Water Bond
Law of 1970, as amended (Chapter 13, Division 7 of Water Code) for
construction of wastewater treatment works; and,
Section 2. That County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, hereby agree and further do
authorize the aforementioned representative to certify that if grants
for their project are made pursuant to the aforementioned federal and
state statutes, they will (1) pay the remaining cost of the approved
project; (2) provide proper and efficient operation and maintenance
of the approved project after completion of construction thereof;
(3) comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352)
and regulations issued pursuant thereto, and hereby state that the
Title VI assurance of compliance forms attached to the Application for
'-"
Federal Assistance pertain to this project; and (4) comply with require-
ments of Executive Order 11246 pertaining to equal employment
opportunity in federally-assisted construction contracts.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 8, 1974.
AGENDA ITEM #29a -IV-ALL DISTRICTS
. . . ' .
RESOLUTION NO. 74-77
ENDORSING THE CLEAN WATER BOND ACT OF 1974
(PROPOSITION 2)
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
ENDORSING THE CLEAN WATER BOND ACT OF 1974
(PROPOSITION 2)
* * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, the State Water Resources Control Board and the
Federal Environmental Protection Agency, pursuant to legislation,
have recently enacted regulations for wastewater quality control,
which said regulations require construction of expanded treatment
and disposal facilities and which construction may be beyond the
ability of local communities to fund without State and Federal
financial assistance; and,
WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and
11 of Orange County, California, have heretofore submitted to the
State Water Resources Control Board a project report for improved
treatment setting forth a detailed plan for conformance with the
State and Federal regulations, which said plan projects a capital
expenditure of approximately $275 million during the next ten years; and,
WHEREAS, the Clean Water Bond Act of 1974, Proposition 2, has
been placed on the ballot for the June 4th Primary Election to provide
funds to be combined with Federal construction grant financing and
local participation for construction of facilities to meet State and
Federal requirements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, do hereby
endorse the Clean Water Bond Act of 1974, Proposition 2, which will
make available $250 million in State construction grant funds to
local communities to assist in the financing of capital facilities
necessary to complete .State and Federal mandated wastewater quality
programs.
PASSED AND ADOTPED at a regular meeting held May 8, 1974.
AGENDA ITEM #29b -V-ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11
of Orange County, California
Hay 1, 1974
AGENDA ITEM NO. !2_
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
Subject: Summary Financial Report for Nine-Months Ended March 31, 1974
Transmitted herewith is the regular quarterly sunvr~ry financial report for the nine months ended March 31, 1974,
pursuant to the Boards' policy directive of June 14, 1972.
The statements su~marize the fiscal activities of the joint operations and the individual Districts fer the first
.three quarters of the 1973-74 fiscal year and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The
corrbined 1973-74 budgets for all Districts is approximately $72 million, of which 83% is for capital expenditures
for facilities improvements and additions. The average percents of budgeted revenue and expense categories of
the several Districts are as follows:
Budgeted Revenue
Tax Revenue
Federal & State Construction Grants
Connection Fees
Other Revenues
Carry-over from Accumld ated
Construction Reserves
Average
Percent of
Total Budget
22%.
8
5
10
Budgeted Expenditures
District Facilities Expansion
and Reserves
Joint Works Expansion and
Reserves
Debt Service
Share of Joint Operations
District Operations, Maintenance,
and Other
Average
Percent of
Tota 1 Budqe t
53%
30
5
4
8
100%
Included in each District's statement is a summary of the above major income and expense categories and an
itemization of their trunk sewer construction projects and respective share of the joint works expansion.
Separate staff reports on individual construction projects are included each month with the agenda material for
the Joint Board meeting.
Expenditures of all 34 funds of the several Districts will be maintained well within their respective 1973-74
budget allocations. Hcwever, because of developments which could not be anticipated when budgets were approved,
it appears as if expenses in certain categories within a few funds will exceed their budget appropriation and,
therefore, the following budget transfers, which are more fully described later in this report, are recommended:
JOINT OPERATING FUND
From the Account To the Account
Prior Year's Expense
Employees• Benefits
Gasoline, Oil, and
Fue 1
Rents and Leases
Ut 111 t I es
Other Expenses
Amount
$29,500
$ 2,000
3,000
3,000
20,000
1, 500
lli~229..
District No.
7
11
DISTRICT OPERATING FUNDS
From the Account To the Account Amount.
Unappropriated Connection
Reserve Administration $ 6 1 000
Unappropriated
Reserve i!.ii_OOO ----
Line Htce. and
Re pal rs $ 7,000
Pump Station
Mtce. and
Repairs 71000
$14,coo
Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. The statements are presented on an accrual
basis and, therefore, inter-district transactions for fiscal •73-711 which were accrued in 1972-73 are not
reflected in the year-to-date balances. If you have any questions concerning the material, I will be pleased
to discuss them with you at your convenience.
CASH AND INVESTMENTS
Earned interest of approximately $2,328,000 from our continuing program of investing reserve funds (primarily
capital funds accumulated for construction of required sewerage facilities) has accrued during the first nine
months of fiscal 1973-74. This is double the interest earnings for the sarre period last year, primarily because
of increased construction funds accumulated and a substantial increase In Interest rate·s over the past year; and
represents an equivalent reduction on the average District's tax rate of approximately 08¢. As of December 31st,
98.5% of the Districts' cash funds were invested in short-term government securities or time deposits as shown
below. The balance of cash on hand was earning interest in conmingled investments with the County Treasurer's
Off ice.
~ Percent
Cash on Hand $ 625,921 1.5%
Investments in Gov't Securities 40,167,104 98.5%
Total (Al 1 Districts) $40,793£025 .!QQ.L
JOINT OPERATING FUND
This fund accounts for operation, maintenanc~, and administrative activities relative to the Districts' jointly-
owned treatment and disposal facilities.
Salaries and Wages -Because of unfilled positions, payroll expenditures for salaries and wages
wil 1 be maintained well below the anticipated budget level and will enable absorption of salary
adjustments for all employees authorized effective December 1, 1973.
Employees' Benefits -Expenditures for authorized .employee benefits will be maintained within the
budget allocation with the exception of Workmen's Compensation Insurance. Because of recent
legislative changes which became effective April 1, 1974, State Compensation Insurance premium rates
have increased 6%. It is therefore necessary to request a transfer of budget funds from the Prior
Year's Expense Account to the State Compensation Insurance Account in the amount of $2,000.
Gasoline, Oil, and Fuel -As the Directors are aware, significant fuel cost increases are being
realized. The Districts' unit cost of fuel has jumped 51%, and it is therefore necessary to request
a transfer of budget funds from the Prior Year's Expense Account to the Gasoline, Oil, and Fuel Account
in the amount of $3,000 for the remainder of this year. The Districts' cooperative purchasing arrang~
ment for gasoline and diesel fuel with the County of Orange has been superseded by Federal petroleum
allocation and price regulations. Under the regulations, sanitation services receive priority alloca-
tions. The recently-completed contract to increase our gasoline storage capacity now allows us to
receive full tank-truck deliveries.
Insurance -Amount reflects the net expense after chargebacks to individual Districts for their
respective share of the insurance overhead related to job costing.
Chlorine and Odor Control Chemicals -Primarily for odor control at treatment plant sites.
Chemical Coagulants -The staff has been able to temporarily change the mode of operation which has
precluded the necessity of expending funds and yet enable the Districts to meet the current enforced
discharge regulations.
Professional Services -Selection of a vendor and implementation of recommendations contained in
EDP study adopted by the Boards is presently under way. Purchasing and warehousing study is
anticipated to be completed during the fourth quarter of the fiscal period.
Rents and Leases -Equipment -Because of unexpected major equipment repairs, the rental of large
cranes necessary for removing and replacing the equipment has exceeded the budget allocation for
the year, and a transfer of budget funds is recommended in the amount of $3,000 from the Prior
Year's Expense al location to the Rents and Leases Account.
Research and Monitoring -Annual share of participation in Southern California Coastal Water
Research Project has been paid, and expense to date includes estimated allocations for the
first three quarters of 1973-74.
-2-
Utilities -The major item in the Utilities Expense Account Is for purchased electrical power.
The Districts have experienced a 54% increase in electrical costs over the same period for the
last fiscal year. Approximately 12% of this is a result of rising demand as flows increase and
new facilities are placed into service. The balance is a result of utility rate increases. It
is therefore necessary to request a budget transfer in the amount of $20,000 from the Prior Year's
Expense Account to the Ut i 1 it i es Account.
Other Expenses -Because of considerable increases experienced in our freight-in expenses, it is
necessary to request a budget transfer of this account from the Prior Year's Expense Account in the
amount of $1,500.
Prior Year's Expense -This account represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account
account balance from the previous year. It is anticipated to be maintained well below the budget
allocation and, therefore, the above budget transfers are reconvnended. to be made from this account.
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND
This fund accounts for the costs of expanding and improving the Districts' presently-°"'ned treatment and disposal
facilities and represents an average of 30% of each individual District's budget requirements for 1973-74.
During the first nine months, $3.4 million was expended on joint works treatment and disposal facilities
expansion. The Districts have completed several major construction contracts and several minor projects .• On
April 17th, a low bict of $29.6 million was received for the 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at
Treatment Plant No. 1. The bid is presently under review by State and Federal agencies and will be considered
by the Joint Boards at their regular June meeting. The share of joint works expansion costs are refle~ted in
the financial statements of the respective Districts.
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS -The statements reflect the accounting transactions for the seven Districts and include
each respective District 1 s share of the Joint Operating Fund and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund.
Taxes -Approximately 52% of the 1973-74 secured tax levy of $15.3 million has been allocated
through March, 1974.
Federal and State Construction Grants -Summarized below is the amount of Federal and State
Construction Grant funds received during the period. Presently, State and Federal agencies will
fund 87-1/2% of 11 approved11 treatment plant projects.
1970-71 Joint Work~ Projects -$1,875,800 representing 20% of grant
1972-73 Joint Works Projects -$2, 156,500 representing 45% of grant
Connection Fees -Districts Nos. 5 and 7 have had connection charges for several years. Connection
fees became effective in Districts Nos. 2 and 3 on October 1, 1973. Collections through December are
reflected under this account in the respective Districts• financial statements.· Sixteen of the
nineteen cities in Districts 2 and 3 have remitted fees collected during the first three quarters.
Our Industrial and Permit Division is contacting the staffs of the remaining cities regarding the
status of connection fees_collected within their respective cities.
Other Revenue -Except as footnoted, consists primarily of interest income, various fees, and sale
of capacity rights.
District Construction -Represents expenditures on Districts' Master Plan construction program of
trunk sewers. The average 1973-74 budget for this item is 53% for the seven Districts. However, this
average is influenced by the major programs of Districts 2 and 3. Itemization of each project is
included on the lower portion of each financial statement. The total expenditures for the seven
Districts during the first three quarters is $8,846,000.
Share of Joint Works Construction -Represents Districts 1 share of joint treatment and disposal
facilities expansion. Discussed above under Capital Outlay Revolving Fund.
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense -Payment of principal and interest on outstanding general obliga-
tion bonds of the respective Districts. Annual expense for al 1 Districts is approximately $2.3 million.
Share of Joint Operating -Represents Districts' share of operating and maintaining jointly-owned
treatment and disposal facilities, and administrative activities. Costs are distributed based upon
each District's respective gallonage flow (see Joint ·Operating Fund statement for details).
District Operating and Other Expenditures -Consists primarily of individual Districts' general
operating expenses and operation, maintenance, and repair of the respective Districts' collection
systems. We have experienced an unanticipated 15% increase in the number of connection permits
-3-
Issued in District No. 7, and it is therefore necessary to request a budget transfer of $6,000 from
the Unappropriated Reserve Account to the Connection Administration Account. Because of necessary
additional maintenance and repairs to the Slater Avenue trunk lines and pump station, a budget
transfer is recommended in District No. 11 from the Unappropriated Reserve Account to the Line
Maintenance and Repair Account, and the Pump Station Maintenance and Repair Account in the amount
of $7,000, respectively.
J. Wayne Sylvester
Director of Finance
-4-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
SUMMA.RY JOINT OPERATING BUDGET REVIEW
Nine Months Ended 3-31-74
REMAINnm BUDGET
1973-74 YEAR TO DA'J.'E BUDG:ST
SALARIES, fvAGES & BENEFITS
Salaries & Wages
Employee Benefits
Sub-total Pavroll
Less:· Chargebacks to Dists & CORF
Net Joint Operating Payroll
MATERIALS, SUPPLIES & SERVICES
Gasoline~l & Fuel
Insurance
Office Expense
Operating Exp2nse
Chlorine & Odor Control Chemicals
Chemical Coagulants
Other Operating Supplies
Contractual Services
~rofessional Services
Printing & Publications
Rents & Leases--Equipment
Repairs & Maintenance
n~search & iilo_.nitoring
~·avel, Heeting & Training
u·cilities
Other Expenses
Prior Years Expense~
Total Material & Supplies
TO'J.1 .A.L JOINT OPEHATING EXPENSE
Less: Revenues
NET JOINT OPER/~TING EXPENSE
2,217,201
·364,330
2,581,531
790,000
1,791, '531
25,000
27,000
16 ,_ooo
75,000
118,ooo
74,800
38,000
46,ooo
28,000
12,000
177,000
194,ooo
12,5'.)0
342,500
4, 750
40,000
1,220,550
3,012,081
200,0JO
2,812,.081
FLO\'! IN
MILLION GALS
GALLONAGE CHARGES
1
2
3 c::
~
6
7
11
4,996
12,854
13,476
2,380
2,537
2,851
3.032
MG
42.126 MG
1,513,002 704,199
239.912 a24.418. 1,752,914 28,617
679,068 110.932
1,073.846 717,685
19,959 5,041
25, 030. 1,970
9, 585 6,415
39,160 35,84:)
118' 00·'.)
40,688 34,,112
10,951 27,049
33,334 12,666
13,159 4,8.41
12,283 (283)
120,870 56,130
70,537 123,463
10,280 2,220
254,639 87,861
4,942 . (192)
6z837 . 33z 16~
672,254 548,296
1,746~10'.) 1, 265, 981-
174,634 25, ~66
1,571,466 1~240.z615
GALLONAGE
CHARGE
186,374
479,517
502,707
88,767
94,653
106,331
1J3.JJ7
l. ~ZJ., !H56
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
March 31, 1974
BUDGET REVIEW
Remaining 1973-74
Budget Year to Date Budget
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
Taxes .
Federal and State Construction Grants
Connection Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditure~
Ending Fund Balances, March 31st
1,119,617
569,300
199,763
500,000
3,119,053
97,038
334,422
171,418
FACILITIES EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION Ill PROGRESS:
Sunflower Interceptor Litigation
Share of Joint Works Expansion
COMPLETED PROPERT1', PD.4.VT & EQUIPMEHT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative
...,acilities
~quity in Joint Treatment Facilities
Total Property Plant & Equipment
Balance
6-30-73
. 433,889
21,657
4,238,544
11, 593
16,078
5,'065,632
9,787,393
2,737,771
669,220
298,699
206,928
3,912,618
26
331,508
89,819
186,374
25,638 .·
633, 365
3,279,253
1973-74
Additions
26
331,508
450,397
270,601
.(7,165)
499,·974
2,787,545
7,219
148,048
145,780
Balance
3-31-71+
26
765,397
21,657
J~, 238, 544
11, 593
16,078
5,065,632._
331,534 lO,Jl8,92~-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
March 31, 1974
BUDGET REVIEW
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Connection Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditure~
Ending Fund Balances, March 31st
1973-74
Budget
4,871,762
1,787,700
975,000
5,666,283
17,697,250
5,783,726
5@9,507
862,817
. 1, 210' 295
FACILITIES EXPANSION
CONSTRUC'I'ION IN PROGRESS:
Santa Ana River Interceptor Reach 1
Santa Ana River Interceptor Reach 2
Other Projects -Design Stage ·
Share of Joint Works Expansion
CQ/.fPLETED PROPERTY. PLANT & EQUIPl·fENT:
Land and Property RiBhts
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
DiGposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative
,aclli ties
Yquity in Joint Treatment Facilities
Total Property Plant & Equipment
Balance
6-30-73
3,734,203
127,858
41,155
3,903,216
1,361,854
212,246
12, 243·, 082
·1, 186
33,i72
28,616
J.S,899 1 584
33.682,956
Remaining
Year to Date Budget
12,911,530
2,883,275
937,532
u20., 401
22 04:i912
19,457,650
5,029,843
1,041,412
536,334
479,517
73240~ .·
7,160,515
12 :i 29:Z: :i 135
1973-74
Additions
4,629,348
246,846
153,649
5,029,843
1,041,412
1,988,487
850,168
654,599
3' 261, :371.
12, 6"67,'4-07
4,742,314
53,173
383,300
1,136,886
Balance
3-31-:Z:4
8,363,551
374,704
194,804
. 8;933,059
2,403,266
212,246
12,243,082
l_, 186
33,172
28,616
1 c:s ' 8 qq t -~ 8 4
6 '071, 255 . 39 ~ 7~)1 .. ~11
COUNTY SArlITATION DISTRICT NO. 3
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FirJANCIAL REPORT
March 31, 19'""(4
BUDGET REVIEW
Remaining 1973-74
Budget Year to· Date Budget
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
Taxes
Fed.eral and State Construction Gr.ants
Connection Fees
O:ther Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reser~es
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, March 31st
6,245,041
1,941,'700
1,800,000
1,603,387
i5,028,ooo
5,436,422
827,184
899,051
792,658
FACILITIES EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
.Share of Knott Interceptor Rchs·. 1 & 2
Knott Interceptor Reach 3
Knqtt Interceptor Reach 4
Balsa Relief Trunk . .
Seal Beacn Blvd. Pump Station Pump
Other Projects -Design Stage
Share of Joint Works Expansion
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PL1NT & EQUIPf·~~NT:
Land and ~roperty Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative
1l'acilities
~quity in Joint Treatment Facilities
Total Property Plant & Equipment
Balance
6-30-73
. 2;472,474
1,184,994
139,211
161;274
6,880
3,964,833
1,479,085
236,105
17,750,732
15,036
.28,4i9
27,092
·17' 268, 248
40,760,sso
12,917,828
3,690,363
1,018,236
290,555
969,873
18,886,855
3,328,883
1,131,195
746,640
502,707
123,188
5,832,613
13,054,242
1973-74
Additions
60,548
2,159,035
883,619
14,287
119,254
92,140
3,328,883
1,131,195.
4,460,078
2,554,678
923, 464 .
,1, 509 ;445
. 633, 514
li,699,117
4,305,227
80,544
.396,344
669,470
Balance
3-31-74
2,533,022·
3,344,029
1,022,830
175,561
126~134
92,140
7,293,716
2,610,280
236,105
17,750,732
15,036
28,419
27,002
17, 268, 2I~8
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
March 31, 1974
BUDGET REVIEW
Remaining 1973-74
Budget Year to Date B.udget
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Connection Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditure~
Ending Fund Balances, March 31st
82~,327 36 , 200
250,000
91,814
541,897
1,384,021
30,040
148,122
587, 537
FACILITIES EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Share of Coast Highway Force Main
Bayside Dr. Trunk Sewer Relocation
Other Projects
Share of Joint Works Expansion
COMPLETED PROPERTYJ PI1ANT & EQUIPME!JT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative
,acilities
Y'quity in Joint Treatment Facilities
Total Pl'operty Plant & Equipment
Balance
6-30-73
698,878
5,528
676
705; 082.
280,276
6,231
2,178~148
7,347
7,1:15
8,946
312721210
_Q_._4651 355
1,225,770
494,244
192,949
52,600
90,400
2.055,963
82,418
214,654
27,384
88,767
1151110.·
528,733
l.~27,230
1973-74
Additions
68,386
14,000
32
82,418
214,654
331,083
175,251
197,400
.l,414~
459,'479
1,169,367
2,656
59,355
472,027
Balance
3-13-74
767,264
19,528
708
787,500
494,93~
6,231
2,178,148
7,347
7,115
8,946
3.272,,210 -
. ..._.,.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
March 31, 1974
BUDGET REVIEW
Remaining 1973-74
Budget Year to· Date Budp:et
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Connection Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Op~rating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, March 31st
519,396
348,700
122,801
251,000
1,553,082
37,079
169,852
. 236, 125
FACILITIES EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
·Share of Coast Highway Force Main
Other Projects
Share of Joint Works ExpanRion
COlefPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative
r.;iacilities
.._,quity in Joint Treatment Facilities
Total Property Plant & Equipment
Balance
6-30-73
94,392
2~983
97,375
265,005
562
524,213
'2,653
7,394
. 23,74~ _.3_,093,91
4.2014.!861
1,422,681
310,233
182,435
118,408
2.,033,,757
14,885
203,751
33,839
94,653
26,347
373,475
1.660,282
1973-74
Addttions
7,747
7,138
14,885
203,751
2181636
209, 163.
166,265
4,393
236;115
1,349,331
3,240
. 75,199
209,778
Balance
3-31-74
102,139
10,121
112,260
468,756
562
524,213
2,653
7,394
23,743
3, 093,916 .
_lL_233' 497
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
March 31, 1974
BUDGET REVIEW
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Gr.ants
Connection Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, March 31st
1973-74
Budget
1,826,211
462,600
230,000
281,020
1,962,114
2,180,693
598,035
193,625
624,246
FACILITIES EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
West Relief Trunk
. Sunflower Interceptor Litigation
Oth~r Projects
Share of Joint Works Expansion
COMPLETED PROPl!.1RTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative
"7acilities
~quity in Joint Treatment Facilities
Total ·Property Plant & Equipment
Balance
6-30-73
521,239
2;056
523,295
351,693
217,751
15,403,613
· 10 ,782
8,082
4,l0:>,994
20,621,210
Remaining
Year to· Date Budget
3,091,874
1,054,380
242,113
254,971
309,266
4,952,604
36,177
270,142
399,712
106,331
271,140
i,083,502
3,869,102
1973-74
Additions
18, 308
61
17,808
36,177
270' 14.2
771,831
220' 487"
(24~97ll (28,246
. ' 1,925,937
1,910,551
198,323
87,294
353,106
Balance
3-31-74
539' 547. 61 .
19,864
559,472
621,835
217,751
15,403,613
lU, 7 C1t:!.
8,082
4,105,994.
306' 319 20 2 927 2 L~'.?C)
COUNTY SA~lITATION DISTRICT NO. i1
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
March 31, 1974
BUDGET REVIEW
Remaining 1973-74
Budget Year to Date Budget
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Connection Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances.
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, March 31st
·'
~.
l,091,4:J.-3
421,800
317 ,.112
1,245,000
2,447,000
100,255
204, 192.
167,350
·FACILITIES EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:·
Shar~ of Knott Interceptor Rchs 1 &.2
Slater Avenue Trunk
Other Projects
Share of Joint Works Expansion
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative
'facilities
~quity in Joint Treatment Facilities
Total Property Plant & Equipment
Balance
6-30-73
392·, 502
314
392,816·
319,802
16,936
2,885,831
3,053
17,116
~,733,675
7,369,229
2,963,503
625, 579.
220,159
219,165
.4,028' 406
354,186
247,305
89,863
113,118
99,385
3,124.549
1973-74
Additions
9,612
340,905
3,669
354,186
247,305
601,491
465,834
201,641
97,947
890,814
2,199,695
10,392
'91,074
67,965
Balance
3-:51-74
402,114
341,219
3,969
747,002
567,107
16,936
2,885,831
3,053
17,116
3,733,675
7,970,720
MEETING DATE __ M_a y_S_,_19_7_4 __
DISTRICT 1
TIME 7:30 p .m. DISTRICTS 1 ,2 ,3 ,5,6 ,7 & 11
(G AR THt:) .•.• ·.P ATTE RSON':'.. ./ __ --
(CLA RK ) ••••••• BATT l N •••..• ---lL ----
RI MA .••.•.•. ~ ----
(LA NGLEY) ••••• SA LT ARELLI •• -L ----
DISTRICT 2
(I\' IL) ••••• GR AHA M •••••• -4,.L. __ _
IE NG) ••••••• CH APUT •.••• • -1L. ----
) •••••• CLA RK . • • • • • • ~ ---
CAL LA HAN ) ••• -t:VONS ••••• _.J.::::::::: --__
· PATTER SON ) .•• GAR THE...... V --__
FOX) ••••••••• MAC KAIN ••• • ~ --__ . _
PE RRY· ••••• • l/" ---
ISTANT ON ) ••••• SCOTT ••••••• ---'=:::::::.--__
THO M) •••••. KA YWO OD • • -1::::::.... ___ _
PEREZ) ••••••• TE Ml?.L E. • ••• • ~ ___ _
· DUNN~)...... I N_N._.' •••• •• ~ ____ .
ROOT) •••••••• WOOD •••••••• ~ ___ _
DISTRICT 3
(MAC KAI N) ••• FOX.;······· ~ --__
(NUIJEl S ) ••••• ARB ISO •••••• ~ ___ _
1
CLARK ••••••• BATTI N.· ••• ·~ ___ _
SALES ••••••• BL ACK MAN •••• --1...:::::::
COLLI NS) ••••• BY RN E. • • • • • • ~== ==
(MEYERJ. •••••• DAVIS ••••••• o-___ _
EDWAR DS ••••• ~ ___ _
(PATTE RSON ) ••• GAR THE. • ••• • 1~ ____ ·_
(WIE DER) •••••• COEN ••••••• -k:::.. ___ _
{LO NG ••••••• COX •• ; • • • • • cµ ___ _
(L '"AY O) •••• .-.soNJ U· ••••.• 0-> ----
( CULVER······ i..---___ _
,YOUN G) ••.•• NEVI L • · • •. ,_.-
(TH OM ) •••••• KAYWOOD .••• -;::::::::-----
(SCOTT ) ••••••• S VAL ST AD.... t..,.../ ----
(ROOT) ........ WOO D ........ ~ ----
~ ----
DISTRICT 5
~CROUL~ ••••••• MC INNIS •••• 1/ --__
BAKER ••••••• CLARK ••••••• --4-=-___ _
·······------
DISTRICT 6
PORTER •••••• ~ ___ _
(CLAR K) ••••••• BATTI N •••••• ~ ___ _
( Mc I N N I s ) • • • • swr e "E. . . . . . . _f::::::::"__ ----
DIST RICT 7
(L ANGLEY) ••••• ALTARE LL C :. ~-----
(P RY OR)....... I . ~ :-:-: ••• ~ ----
( ) •••••• CLARK ••• •• .• .....LL. ----
(GARTHE) •••••• PATTEP.S ON •.• ~ ----
POR TER •••••• ~ ----
(M C I NN I S ) •••• ROGERS .·····~ ----
(p · :z) · · · · ·JACKMAN • • ~----
DI STR l CT 11
(coEN) .•••••• DUKE .••••••• ~ ----
(CLARK) ••••••• BAKER •..• • •. ~ ----
(GIBBS) L . · .~~ · • · · · · ·~ ----
DI STRICT 8
(J OHN SON)
MIT CHELL ••• ·------
CL ARK ·······------
HO LM •••••••• -------
JOINT BO ARDS
CALLA H.t\N ) .••• t.YONS .•••• __rL_ __
NUIJE lS J ••••• ARB ISO •••••• ~ __
CLA RK ••••••• BAK E R .•••••• _.!:::::::... __
. CLAR K •••••.• BA TTI N •••••• _::::::=.._ __
SALE S ••••••• BLAC KM AN •••• ~
PRYOR) ••••••• BURTO N •••••• -;:::::---
(COLL I NS) ••••• BY RN E ••••••• !/""' --
(EWING) ••••••• CHAPUT •••••• --:=:-----
1
) ...... CLARK . • • • • • • ,__..---
MEYER) ••••••• DAV IS ••••••• ~===
COEN) •••••• DUKE •••••••• ~
EDWARD S .. • • • 1.....------
(MAC KAIN) •••• FOX ••••••••• ~ --
(PATTER SO N) ••• GARTHE •••••• -V---
{w I EDER OR COE N ••••••• -V --
. GI BBS) e)~\?s ••••••• --:::::::----
(LONG ) ••••••• CO X •••••••• a.--. -
(PEREZ) ••••••• JACKMAN ••• ··~==· .......
l LAC~Yo) ••••• ·.so NJU······· 0--===
FOX) ••••••••• MAC KA I N. • • • ,,.,...-
CROUL) ••••••• MC I NN IS •••• ---V---
YO UNG ) ••••• NEVIL ••••••• ---1:::::::::.. --
GARTHE) •••••• PATTER S ON ••• _i.::::::__ --
. PERRY ••••••• ~ --
. PORTER •••••• t...-----
RI MA • • • • • • • • --0:::----
(MC INNIS) •••• RO GER S •••••• ---:;----
(LANGLEY) ••••• SA LTARELLI •• ---V---
(S T AN TON ) ••.•• SCO TT....... v --
(TH OM . .J ..... KA YWOOD • • ~ --
1
.N EY IL J ••.. GRAHAM • • • • • v-" --
MC INNI S J. .... s:(-9-RE ••••••• --=---
S COTTl ••••••• SVA LSTAD •••• -V --
~PE R EZ •••.••• TE MPL E ••.••• ---:-=:::---
DUNN E •••••••• WI NN •••••••• --:;:::;---
ROOT) •••••••• WOO D •••••••• i........-====
CULV ER······ ,__ __
OTHERS
HA RPE R
SYLVE STER
. LEWIS
DU NN
CL ARKE
TA YLOR
BROWN
NI SSON
EWIN G
HOH EN ER
HOWARD
HU NT
KE IT H
KENNEY
LYNCH
MADDOX
MAR TI NSON
P I ERSALL
S TEVENS
MEETING DATE Ma y 8 , 1974 TIME 7:30 p.m . DISTRICT~ 1,2,3,5,6 ,7 & 11
DISTRICT 1 ~ 2=__/ 11
---JOINT BOARDS . --·-
(G AR TH{:) •••••• P ATTE RSON ••• -""-----
(CLARK) ••••••• BATTIN •••••• -"' -----
RI MA ........ ~ ----
(LANGLEY) ••••• SA LTARELLI •• ....L_ ----
DISTRICT 2
(N IL) ••••• GRAHAM •••••• -"-___ _
E1vfNG) ••••••• CHAPUT •••••• _..;_ ----
) .•••••• CLARK ••••••• _f_ ----
CALLAH AN ) ••• l=¥8itS-.•..• _,;_ ----
PATTERSON) ••• GARTHE •••••• _L ___ _
·Fox) •...•.••• MAC KAIN •••• _v_ ---
PERRY ••••••• _/ __ ·--
!
STANTON) ••••• SCOTT .••••.• _./ ____ _
JHO M) •••••. KAYWOOD .• J
PEREZ) ••••••• TE MP LE. • • • • • / == == DUNN~) ••••••• WI NN. • • • • • • • /
ROOT) •••••.•• WOOD ••••••.• ~ ___ _
DISTRICT 3
(MAC KAIN) •••• FO X.········ __::!_;_ ___ _
( NUI JElS) ••••• ARB I SO •••••• _-t ____ _
ltLARK ••••••.• BATTIN •••••. _I ___ _
SALES ••••••• BLACKMAN •• • •
COLLINS) ••••• BYRNE ••••••• v == ==
MEYER) ••••••• DAVIS ••••••• ~ ___ _
EDWARDS..... /
(PATTERSO N) ••• GARTHE •••••• / == ==
(WIE DER) •••••• COEN • • • • • • • /
(LONG ••••••• COX •••••••• --.-== ==
(L "''AYO)···· ···SONJU · · · • · • • ~ ----CULVER ······_,, ___ . __ _
(YO UNG) ..... NEVIL . .. .. . ~
(TH OM ) •••••• KAYWOOD ••• -;-----
(s COTT) ••••••• SVA LSTAD •••• -./-----
(ROOT) •••••••• WOOD ........ / == ==
DISTRICT 5
(CROUL) ••••••• MC INNIS •••• _v _____ ,
(BAKER) ••••••• CLARK ••••••• _/ ____ _
·······------
DISTRICT 6
/ PORTER •••••• _____ _
(cLARK) •.••••• BATT I N •••••• _.1 ____ _
(MC I NN I S) •••• ST ORE ••••••• _____ _
DIST RICT 7
(LA NG LE Y) ••••• SA LTARE LLI .• _I _ ----
(P RYOR) ••••••• BU RffiN .••••• _v _ ----
( ) •••••• CLARK •.•.• •• ------
lGARTHE) ••••.• PATTERSO N •• ,_1 _ ----
/ PO RTER ••••• ·------
(MC INNI S ) .••• ROGERS .··.··------
(p · '~Z) · · · · ·JACKMAN • • _/_ ----
DI STR 1 CT 11
CcoEN). . •.••• DUKE ••..•••• -./-----
(CL ARK) ••••.•• BAK ER .••• ···--· ----
(GI BBS ) • • • • · • Ca;ZJ · · · · · · ·-,/-----
DISTRICT 8
(JOHN SON )
MITCHE LL ••• ·------
CLARK ·······------
HOLM ........ -------·
!CALL AHAN ) •••• U 'eN& ..... _.; __ _
NUIJEIS) ••••• ARB IS O •••••• _v __ _
CLARK ••••••• BAKER .•••••• ____:::._ __
CLAR K ....... BATTI N...... /
.(SALES ••••••• BLACKMAN.... ./ ==
(PRYOR ....... ~M T 61 J...... v
(COLLINS) ••••• BYRNE ••••••• ~ --
(EWING) ••••••• CHAPUT...... v
~ ) •••••• CLARK ••••••• -./---. -
MEYER) ••••••• DAVIS ••••••• --C---
COEN) •••••• DUKE •••••••• --:7 --
EDWARDS ••••• -Y --
~MAC KAI N) •••• FOX ••••••••• -/---
PATTERSON) ••• GARTHE •••••• v ==
W-iE DER aQR COEN ••••••• ./
. GIBBS)~ --~ .......... -vr---
(LONG ) ••••••• COX ••••.••• ~ --
(PEREZ) ••••••• JAC KMAN ••••• -;;---.......
FOX) ••••••••• MA C KAIN •••• / ILAC8YO) ••••• ·SONJU··· • ·•• '~ ~
CROUL) •.••••• MC INNIS •••• --V --
YO UNG ) ••••• NEVIL ••••••• -./---
GARTHE) •••••• PATTE RSON ••• ~ --
PERRY ••••••• ~ --
. PORTER •••••• ~ --
RIMA •••••••• ~ --
(MC INNIS) •••• ROG ERS •••••• _L --
(LA NG LEY) ••••• SALTARE LLI • • / --
(S TAN TON) •••• ,SCOTT ••••••• ~ --
(THOM . ) KAYWOOD -/---
(NEVIL . J .•.•• GRAHAM • ·-./---
(Mc I NNIS~::: :sTORE •. ::::: c,._ --
(scOTT) ••••••• S'IALSTAD ••.• -v---
lPEREZ ) ••••••• TEMPLE •••••• ~ --
DUNN{:).. •••••• WINN •••••••• --;---
ROOT) •••••••• WOOD •••••••• v ~
CUL VER ····· ._L_ __
OTHERS
HA RPER
SYLVESTER
. LEW I S
DU NN
CLA RKE
TAYLOR
BROWN
NISSO N
EWIN G
HOHENER
HOWARD
HUNT
KEITH
KENNEY
LY NCH
MADDOX
MARTINSON
P I ER S AL L
STEVEN S
May 8, 1974 MEETING DATE -------TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11
DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS :'',' ~~~o..::n \ D To._ Qr:' ti ':-:'.; ./ ) Al )~~1 •••.•••• -,.'\T,E.,...,C,"r.-T. ------CALLAHAN •••• LYOf~S ••••• 4l.:_ __
CLARK) ••••••• BATTIN •••••• ..t__ ---NUI JE!S) ••.••• ARB I SO •••••• __L_ __
RIMA ••.••••• ..&__ ----CLARK ••••••• BAKER ••••••• _,,, __ _
(LANGLEY) ••••• SALTARELLI •• _.,,_ ----CLARK ••••••• BATTIN •••••• _v __ _
DISTRICT 2 SALES ••••••• BLACKMAN •••• _y_
PRYOR ••••••• BURT0t~...... v
( ~· IL) ••••• GRAHAM •••••• _L __ __ ~COLLI ~S) • • • • • BYRNE ••••••• --4-==
!
EWfNG) ••••••• CHAPUT •••••• _v_ __ __ ~EWING ) •••••• CHAPUT •••••• ~ __
) •••••• CLARK ••••••• ~ ----E ) •••••• CLAVRK ••••••• _L -· -
CALLA A. N) 1 uo, .. .a 1/ M YER • • • • • ••DA IS• • • • • • • /)... H • • ·~vc43 • • ••• ~ ----OEN) K ---PATTERSON) •• • GARTHE. • • • • • _L_ ---C •••••• ~gW~RD...... ~ --
FOX) ••••••••• MAC KAIN •••• _v-_ ----~AC KAIN) FOX S ••••• - -PERRY ••• {r."'::. ___:::::_ __ __ . ·. ) • • • • •••••••• _.:!._ -
!
STANTON) ••••• SCOTT ••••••• _L_ __ __ A--T-TERSDN • •• GARTHE •••••• ___:!.__ __
JHOM) •••••. KAYWOOD .• _L ____ . ·/ WIEDER ~R COEN ••••••• -"'·-__
PEREZ~-· ••••• TEMPLE •••••• _./ _____ ·· ... ~. GIBf~-·y· X .•••••• ·--
DUNN} WI NN ./ ·-·-:-l:;QNG·-••••••• CO •••••••• _6'-· _
• • • • • • • • ••••••• -2..;.. ----· JACK AN ROOT •••••••• WOOD •••••••• _v-_· ----PEREZ • • • • • • • M ••••• _<i_" --
DISTRICT 3
(MAC KAIN) •••• FOX.· • • • • • • • ___:!.__ ____ ·
(NUIJE~S) ••••• ARB I SQ...... ..,
!CLARK ••••••• BATTIN •••••• •· == __
SALES ••••••• BLACKMAN. • • • '.
COLLI NS) ••••• BYRNE. • • • • • • . ·~· == ==
MEYER) ••••••• DAVIS ••••••• ~ ___ _
EDWARDS. • • • • ./
(PATTERSON) ••• GARTHE •••••• ,/ == ==
(WIEDER) •••••• COEN • • •• • • • "
(LONG ••••••• COX •••••••• -.. '.-----
(L • ~AYO)··· • • ·• SONJ U ••• !' •. • • i == == ~ CULVER· .;It;~.~ ___ _
(YOUNG) ••••• NEVIL . • • • • • /
~THOM . ) •••••• KAYWOOD ••• -./-----
SCOTT) ••••••• S VALS TAD.... / == ==
ROOT) •••••••• WOOD •••••••• _./ ____ _
DISTRICT 5
(CROUL) ••••••• MC INNIS •••• _.,,_ ----
(BAKER) ••••••• CLARK ••••••• -"-___ _
·······------
DISTRICT 6
. PORTER •.•••• _.t ____ _
(CLARK) ••••.•• BAiTIN •••••• _v _____ _
(Mc INN Is) •••• s+ORE ••••.•• -"''-' ----
DISTRICT 7
(LANGLEY) iJ .,,. •• SALTARELLI •• + ----~PRYOR) • .x,f>P. •• BURTOrt: .•.•. • ••• ------~ ..... ·~~~~~·.:,~~·:1.1.----S-----~.I •••••• ,-A1 ,r.;f'-Su.~.W; __ ----
PORTEr~ •••••• _../_ ----
(MC INNIS) •••• ROGERS •••. ··-'*'-. ----
(p i:z) ·····JACKMAN • ._L_ ----.._,.
DISTRICT 11
~COEN).-•• -•••• DUKE.· •••••• ____:!:._ ----
CLARI<) ••••••• BAKER •••• ··-~ ----
GIBBS) • • • • • 'OE~i • • · • • · .~ ----
DISTRICT 8
(JOHNSON)
MITCHELL ••• ·------
CLARK ••• ····------
HOLM •••••••• -------
FOXJ ••••••••• MAC KAIN •••• ~ !LAC~ YO) •. • • • • ·SO NJ U • • • • • • • t:.~.... ==
CROUL) ••••••• MC INNIS •••• -.. _.---
YOUNG ) ••••• NEVIL ••••••• -~,---
GARTHE) •••••• PATTERSON ••• -,,---
PERRY ••••••• -"---
. PORTER •••••• -lf-.. --
RI MA • • • • • • • • ---Z::: --
(MC INNIS) •••• ROGERS •••••• ---;---
(LANGLEY) ••••• SALTARELLI •• v, ==
(STANTON) ••••• SCOTT ••••••• "
( THOM . ) ••••• KAYWOOD •• -v.-... --
NEV IL J j .... GRAHAM ••••• -,.----
MC I N N I S , ••••• STORE ••••••• ~ --
SCOTT~ •••••• ·.sVALSTAD •••• -, .. --.-
PEREZ ••••••• TEMPLE •••••• -~----
DUNNt: •••••••• WINN •••••••• -.t-. --
ROOT) •••••••• WOOD •••••••• -,---
OTHERS
--l . ~--------
/f,.-JI
CULVER·····. 7 --
HARPER
SYLVESTER .
. LEWIS
DUNN
CLARKE
TAYLOR
BROWN
NISSON
EWING
HOHENER
HOWARD
HUNT
KEITH
KENNEY
LYNCH
MADDOX
MARTINSON
PIERSALL
S}EV~NS
v
.1
--.......
.' I 1. . ~/
-~ . . I ,_
. JIJ,d~b:,.l v
5/8/74 JOINT MEETING
(4) Jerr y Patterson nominated . No further nominations . Nominations
closed. Patterson elected Chairman of District No . 1
(5) Donald Winn nominated . No further nomi nations. Nom i nations closed .
Winn elected Chairman of District No. 2
(6) Donald Fox nominated . No further nominations . Nominations closed .
Fox elected Chairman of District No. 3
(7) Mcinnis requested that annual election for District 5 be held off
until June . It was so moved , seconded and carried .
(8) Ellis Porter nominated. No further nominations . Nominations closed.
El l is Porter elected Chairman of District No . 6
(9) Donald Saltarelli nominated. No further nominat ions. Nominations
closed. Saltarelli elected Chairman of District No . 7
(10) Henry Duke nominated. No further nominations. Nom inations closed .
Duke elected Chairman of District No . 11
(13) Report of the Joint Chairman
Called a meeting of the Executive Committee for May 28th and invited
Directors Svalstad and Sonju to attend . Mcinnis advised t h at
District 5 would not be able to attend as their council meeting
is that night . Duke questioned whether Tuesday night was a bad
n i ght since there wasn 't a quorum last month. Porter suggested that
possibly Wednesday night would be better. Voted by hand and three
voted for Wednesday . Changed meeting date to the 29th of May .
Porter then announced that there would be an orientation program
for new Directors _at 5:30 p.m . on May 30th . Would tour the treatment
plants and discuss long-range plans and objectives. N~MX~XK~~~~
(14) Report of the General Manager
Mr . Harper referred to report included in Directors' folders prepared
by SCCWRP. This is a continuing program that has been going on for
about 4 y,ears and our Districts are financial participants. Have a
representative on the Commission. Feel the work be ing conducted is
very significant. Study marine environment . Program extends from
Mexican border to Santa Barbara County l ine . Funding this at the
rate of about $1/2 million per year with all agencies together .
Previous l y submitted a report for first three years ' work with
significant findings. Are cont i nuing to l ook into reported problems
concerning discharge i nto marine waters . Information and evaluation
will be very significant over the years .
(
FAH referred to Supplemental Agenda item No . 29b. Reso lution endorsing
the Clean Water Bond Act of 1974 (Pr oposition 2). Said the resolution
<
dec l ared that the Boards of Directors of OCSD are in favor of passage
of the bi l l . With the Directors' permiss i on after adoption of this
reso l ution, woul d release their names and cities or agencies represented
as in favor of this bond issue which will help the local communities
) to finance the construction programs necessary to meet the objectives
~ of the Federal Act .
Clark asked where the money was coming from and FAH answered that the
State would have to sell bonds .
Regarding JPL activated carbon process that has been under development
here , reported that we had representatives from Washington, D.C., EPA
and NASA , SWRCB, Region IX of EPA in San Francisco, and many other
dignitaries here. Mr. Harper briefly outlined process . Said after
the briefing in the morning, the technical peop l e from EPA and State
met with JPL and our staff technicians and discussed how this p rogram
could be expanded. What we are suggest i ng to EPA and State is that
we convert the primary clarif iers at Plant 2 so we can u se a phy sical -
chemical process which we have developed for one of our clarifiers
wh i ch will remove a greater amount of solids. We are also suggesting
that $3~ million be allowed for further development of this process
on a larger scale. Pilot plant handles 10,000 gallons a day and
JPL feels it needs to be scaled-up to at least 1,000,000 a day or more .
The approach of JPL is to spend another year developing pilot plant
techniques and then possibly a twp -year expanded program. EPA
representative felt that with what he saw at the pilot plant, it would
be better if they would just move into an expanded program rather
than spend one year on the pilot program . One advantage is that we
utilize sludge as part of the purification process and end up with
just an ash and the ash reduces it down to 10% of what the solids
would be otherwise . State has asked that we submit an amendment to
the Project Report that we qsubmitted several months ago requesting
that we be permitted toa g·o to design of modification of sedimentation
basins at Plant 2 and request Step II grant for further development
of JPL process.
(i5) Report of the General Counsel
Mr. Nissan reported on letter received from Counsel for the Garden
Grove Sanitary District, Ron Tiday, who requested that we consider
interpreting the Act regarding Directors of sanitary districts in
such a manner that the Garden Grove Sanitary District and other
sanitary districts could have an alternate to their member. Said he
couldn't quarrel with the idea but statute just doesn't allow an
\ •Jr alternate delegate for a sanitary district. Wrote Mr. Tiday that if
-/ ·' they felt tk~t strongly about it, perhaps Directors would support
.!~p1 legislation to get Act amended so sanitary districts could have alternates
~ .t\ to their delegates. Niss on said he was in Sacramento in 1955 and \.}~ recalled there was a discussion concerning this at that time and the
~ prevailing thought was that they did not want to have alternate members
for the sanitary districts and that was why they were specifically left
out . LA County was the dominate force for that amendment and they
don't have any sanitary districts in that county .
With regard to discussion several months ago re Conflicts of Interest
legislation and the resolution passed by certain Districts that unless
State legislators were required to report as well as councilmen and
supervisors, they felt it was bad legislation, Senator Whetmore said
State legislators are subject to Act if it ever gets past Supreme
~Court .
Also reported that Federal Fair Labor Standards Act amendment was
effective May 1st and will affect Districts . Will be paying time
and one -haif for overtime and will not be allowed compensatory time
off in lieu of money . Will be getting some information probably by
next meeting. Just how far or how many employees this affects, can't
answer yet.
Finally finished the District 3 suit vs . Amercoat. Lost it, as
anticipated. Started in 1958. Second trial.
Peter Kiewit suit laid to rest finally .
For the first time in 10 years, are going to trial for District 2
right of way. Set for June 3rd . 12 separate owners to deal with.
Settled all but 2 or 3 .
Reported that several weeks ago received a call from a lady from the
Association of University Women regarding Proposition 2 and said he
gave her information which he hoped would be adopted tonight.
Question was then asked concerning property in District 2 suit and
where it was located . Nissan answered it is along the west bank of
the Santa Ana River immediately s·outh of Warmer Avenue. Our offer is
$6,300 and their demand is $16,300.
-2-
Nevil questi o ned Nisson's statement that t he P e ter Kiewi t suit was
finally put to bed . Asked what the disposi tion of tha t suit was.
Nisson answered that it was terminated for a ll time. $1 00 ,000 --
$40,000 from Districts and $60,000 from Eng i n eers or insurance company .
Nevi l then asked Nisson to expla i n what the original suit was for the
t benefit of the new Directors. Said suit was for extra work cau sed -~l .... -lr .... \i·' by improper specifications for construction of t he l arge o ut fall and
I ) y"· ,, their demand was $650, 000. Sai d he thought it was a good se ttle ment ~ 1' ·vJ.;' on behalf of the Districts . Spe n t close to $75, 000 in defense costs
0 >. (Y etc .
(20)~NPDES Permit
Mr. Harper stated that as a result of the 1 972 Amendments to Fede r al
Act, EPA has been required to issue to all dischargers t hroughout the
U.S. a permit which is known as a NPDES permit. These permitsmust be
issued by the end of thi6' year . In California the EPA has made
arrangements with the SWRCB to issue these permits since they are the
regulatory agency closest to the dischargers. I n our par t icul ar case
we built our outfall out five mi les and becau se the federal government
does recognize the three -mile limit, they are in the ac t as we l l as
the State .agency. Only two situations like this .--Ou n agency and Ci ty
of LA . Nisson added that Alex Bowie had sai d that he was going to
have another one . Mr . Harper advised that we just receive p rop o sed
conditions for permit a day or two before last mon t h 's Board meet ing
and were not able to report on ramifications of regul ations. Hearing
date was May 3rd and requested that hearing be continued to J une 7th
which is the next meet ing of th e Regional Water Qual i ty Control Board .
The Districts ' staff is meeting with repres entatives of EPA and Re gional
Board, State Fish a nd Game and County Health Departments attempting
to come to some agreement on why they are putting certain requi rements
on us at this time .a nd what the ramifications are . Int roduced Kri s
Lindst rom, Environmental Specialist , to report on situation to d ate .
Kris reported that this permit, being the f i rst o f it s k ind, is taking
into account the recently adopted EPA regulations and California Oc ean
Plan regulations and encompasses quite a broad range of removal of
certain pollutants which r e quire certa i n de grees of t reat me nt. Rat her
complex. 4 3 page permit . Have had f o ur in -hous e staff meetings t o
revie w ramifications. Met with E PA twice . Has significant imp ac t on
taxpayers of Orange County through l imitat i ons spec i f i ed in this permit.
I ndust r ial pre -tre a tment require d and plac es the b u rden on Dis tric ts
to bring a l l industrial trunk sewer s into compliance . Eff l uent l i mita-
tions . re bio -chem ic a l o xygen d e mand as well as heav y metals and
other metals . Reporting req uire me nts are q u i te ext ensi ve and even go
back to t he Districts having industries report any inplant changes and
wit h some 5000 industries, ramifi cations overwhelm ~o ur present capaci t y .
Much concern over monitor~ng and reporting sys tem specified which would
in vo l ve considerable cost and far e xt e nds our present p r ogram and get s
into realm of ocean r esearch which Districts are supporting through SCCWRP .
Aren't even ways to me asure some of these pollu tants yet . Hav e pr epared
comments on technical points to show to Re g i ona l Board for the ir staff
to take into consideration . Ha v e had quite a good report f r om var i o u s
agencies in reso lving some of the conflicts that h ave come u p wi th r egard
to mo n i toring such as who i s to do what, who pays fo r i t and where the
money comes from. Distri cts are h aving to absorb costs and co sts are
e~orbitant. Other age n c ies wou ld have similar re quirements and have
expressed co n cern over monitoring require ments not b e i ng standardized .
Much of this i nformation spec ified would n ot really be meaning f ul . If
further treatment required ,would not show any corre lation to some o f
the bacteria limitations . Presently , we are meeting all of the chlorina-
tion stan da rd s along 14 mil es of b eac h . Some of the limi tations imposed
seem rather arbitrary and may require continuous chlorination and may
cost 1/2 more per year ., EPA requires chlorinatio n and State requires
no chlorine . Presently me ets standards and have had no reported b asic
health problems. Ag e n cies h ave not come forth with any rationale .
-3-
Duke questioned comments regarding rationale and asked if we had taken
a positive approach and made suggestions of what standard s should be.
We are always asking EPA and federal agencies to prove it to u s . Maybe
we should start tak i ngapositive approach and give them our recommenda-
tions for al l Districts and all agencies . Maybe they are looking for
someone to do this . Kris advised that this is what we have been doing
with the technical information we have been providing them . Have been
pointing out to them that if we meet their requirements , 20% of samp l es
would be in violation . We are trying to come up with meaningful program
and trying to find out the effects and what can be done . Porter added
that staff has taken a positive attitute in providing them with th is
basic research and cost figures. The staff is on top of this.
Saltarelli added that he wanted to compliment the staff on the way they
have conducted this the last couple years . Think it is about time that
staff convey message of Directors that we will not be put into a
position to do ~something that is rid i culous .such as wanting us to
reduce the arsenic level below that which i s fo und i n normal drinking
water . Can 't spend taxpayers money for something that is that ridiculous.
Let them know that we will cooperate but will have to draw the line .
Culver then asked Mr. Harper regarding Clean Water Bond Act of 197 4 ,
what is ratio of Federal govennment to State? Federal government 75%,
State 12~% and Local government 12~%.
FAH advised that we are attempting to have another meeting with EPA
and Seate representatives sometime this next week to further negotiate
on these requirements . Said that not only are we faced with expenditure
but any expenditures that we make reduces our ability to build . This
permit is for the next three years. Rather than take the requirements
we have now, they are beefing them up and will require additional
expenditures . Faced with SB 90 which means we can not raise our
taxes. This takes money away from our construction program , and the
construction program is really the thing that is going to improve our
treatment . For monitoring have been spending $97 ,000 per year plus
our investment in the SCCWRP program . Program they suggested )would
cost $447 ,000 . Through negotiations and discussions, program now is
down to $242 ,000, which is still about $150,000 more than we are paying
right now. The program the stafffaould recommend would give us type of
information meaningful to State and EPA and to us .in that it wo uld
support some of our positions concerning EPA requirements . Would cost
$176,000 . This program would give good information to have. We do now
meet shellfish standards which are the most restrictive standards . They
are considering some offshore bacteria sampling spots where th is may
put us in a situation from a statistical standpoint that we could be
in violation and would cause us to chlorinate , and this is in violation
of California Ocean Plan. Chlorine is in short supply to begin with .
Said these are some of the things we will be pointing out to these
people from regulatory agencies. Question was asked if these program
costs were annual or for three years . Mr . Harper answered they were
annual figures for cost of Sanitation Districts to do this . It was
then asked how much per hour is the lab time and was answered $8 .00 /hr .
Mcinnis then asked if this had b een covered with the Orange County
Chamber of Commerce and what their reaction was? FAH reported that
h e had met with a Sanitation Task Force from the Chamber of Commerce
today and discussed this with them. Main concern is XNat our agency
reaching back into our system and insisting that the various industries
connected to our s~stem go to pre-treatment of waste in accordance
with some g uidelines being establis h ed b y EPA. Also being faced with
charging users for capital cost recovery . Must find out how much of
the treatment facilities are b ein g used by certain businesses and
then collect a certain amount annually over a 30 year period , of which
we will send h a l f back to the Treasurer in Washington, D .C . Some of
the feeling is that this is a lright for a small community of 10,000
people but not in a complex situation such as ours . Mechanics of
collecting fees very complex. This is something that has to be changed .
Culver asked if we still had our lobbyist i n Washington and was answered ,
yes. Are concerned if this is a State mandated program , they may have
to pay for it since we can't raise our taxes .
-4 -
Mr. Harper then stated that with the Dire ctor s permission , the staff
would like to cont i nue to hold meet i ngs with State people and EPA
and attempt to get a program somewhere in the neighborhood of $1 76 ,000 ,
and to get some of the r equ irements changed so we don 't have to
chlori nate . He further mentioned that we just opened bids on a
46 MGD Activated Sludge Plant and h ope to award at next meeting if
it meets approval of State. This will tak e care of 1 /3 of our flow .
Culver then asked wh at happens if this bond act is not passed?
Mr. Harper answered we will then receive 75% funding from EPA and
our agency wou ld have to come up with 25%. Now we have to come u p
with 1 2~%.
The Chair then entertained a mot i on to authorize t he staff to cont i n u e
discussions. It was so moved , seconded and carried.
Directors ' attitude: No a rbitrary requ i rements without scientific backi ng .
Must be meaningful or won't go along with them. Want to know why regarding
requirements .
(22) GC Report re sanitary districts' representation
[
Perry asked in order to e l imi nate the waste of taxpayers ' money to
(!,...~ have the statute changed , is i t poss ib le for the Boards of Directors
~ + to take action by motion to allow sanitary districts to have alternate
(~ directors? Nissan stated that his opini on was that they cannot .
Cannot do i t except by change of statute . No other way .
(29a) Filing app li cation f or Federal & State g r ants
Mr. Harper reported that the State Board was attempting to move some
of these programs ahead and we had been axkR~ requested to subm it an
application for g r ants f or 1 974 -75 year . Cu l ver asked if t his i sn 't
a matter of policy? FAH advi sed that we are r equested each time we
s u bmit an application for a federal g r ant that Board a uthorize the
General Manage r to sign necesarry papers , etc . Motion was carried.
(29b) Clean Water Bond Act of 1974
It was requested that befor e we get involved in this, wo uld l i ke t o
hear arguments against it . FAH said argument for is that it reduces
in half the l oca l agency 's participation and wil l help by $250 mi l lion .
There is a need in Cali f ornia of $6 bill i o n to meet Stat e and Federal
requ i rements . California receives about 10 % of the money allocated
by EPA and thi s c orning year will be $4 billion available nationwide .
Sai d he d idn 't know of any argument against it other than the bonds
will have to b e sold and paid for over a long period of t i me which
will cost about double the figure toJ;Ry bac k . Don't th i nk we will get
State out of the picture . They will still continue to administer the
program here in Cal i fornia. EPA feels that State does have a good
program. Our concern is that we wish things would move along a lot
faster and not so much paperwork. Are concerned tNat regarding
$28 million for Improved Treatment at Plant No . 2 , that they are
considering m~xiNg on the 16th moving this money into the next fiscal
year wh i ch means we will be losing out on $28 million .because EPA
will take approximate l y a year to submit report on project. Impoundment
of one -ha lf the money at federal level has created some problems .
Arbiso moved the resolution.
planning and good foresi ght.
items 29a & 29b .
(54) Change Order to 2-14-1
Sai d i t was a matter o f l ong-range
Chair cast a unanimous ballot f or
Mr . Harper was asked to Rx~iai briefly exp lain. He explained history
behind change of pipe size , etc.
(55) Public Hearing on Reach 3 of S .A. River Interceptor
Mr . Harper reported that two hearings were held on May 7th on proposal
to extend S .A. River Interceptor . Project originally started at Plant 1.
Next segment of this project will take pipe from La Palma to County line
and then upper agencies will construct a col l ection system wh i ch is
-5-
-J" ~;r actually four interceptors that extend up in the Corona area, A ,)~ ~Riverside, San Bernardino , Chino and Ontario . Purpose is to bring .,r ~ brines accumulated in upper basin to our system for treatment at
~ Plant 2. Already constructed interplant line and now finishing
construction of the diversion structures so we can be selective as
to what flows come into Plant 1 . Hearing was on Reaches 3 & 4 --San
Bernardino and Riverside area . Were about 30-40 people at 2:00 meet i ng ,
and testimony was taken relative to merits or demerits of the project.
Questioned what would go into the line and t he affect on marine
environment . Capacity for upstream agencies will be 30 MGD. We re
approximately 20 people in attendance at the evening hearing .
Discussion centered around questions as to how the capacity would be
~ used in the upper basin . Some 20 Tons of salt in upper basin. Much
\..-of it comes from agricultural runoff and dairy wastes. There is a ,y concentrated study of whole river basin as far as water management \J .~ program. This is one of about eight things t hat are being p roposed
~\ 1 • to alleviate situation. Don 't feel improvement of water quality can
~, t(\,~"" move ahead until after this.
(~~~
;o/
..._,,
Clark asked what activity was on the other side? FA H said if this
program is accepted by state and federal people, they will go into
des i gn about the same time we will . They have done exactly the same
preliminary work as we have and their construction program is
supposedly synchronized with when we reach the County Line . They
will have one of their major reaches finished . They will have
considerable costs .
Chaput asked what the schedule was as fgr as when we will be asked
to make a decision? FAH stated that once we get the go ahead from
the State, will come to Board for final decision on pipe size through
canyon. They have 120 days in which to review this report so
probably will be about four months from now. FAH asked Jack Kenney
when they expect State will give go ahead on this . Said they expected
about August .
(57) Kaywood questioned whose expense and whose mistake it was re ???
Was answered contractor 's expense.
(58) Questionedwhat tk~ warrant H22993 to Kasler Corp . for $470 ,2 02.3 0 ~was
for and asked for clarification. FAH advised that this was the contractor
working on 2 -14 -2 and the warrant was his progress payment on this job.
(63) EIR for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer -Director stated that he was curious
as to procedure with E I R's. Asked if they would consider this in detail
at some other meeting and was answered yes -they wo uld .
(66) Request of Restaurant Adventures , Inc.
FAH reported that as directec by Board at last meeting, he discussed
with Director of Public Works of City of Orange what the alternatives
were for connection of this property . 1Sent standard agreement which
City uses to connect to City when outside District to proponent.
Two alternatives: (1) to connect to this l i ne in Chapman Avenue and
(2) to construct a line some 900 ft. from the property t o the south
to connect to CPawford Canyon Subtrunk Sewer. Construction requ ired
would be an 8" line from 900 "ft., beginning at 8 ft . deep to some
20 ft . deep and would be extremely rocky . Would be expensive con-
struction . In the District 's Master Plan for the area in which t he
property is located , the subtrunk sewer which we propose to have
extended in Chapman Avenue should serve this property . City has
constructed a line which meets sizing and capacity requirements of
District 7 and the intent is for us to purchase the line at some
time . Clark asked whose intent it is to buy this. FAH answered it
was the staff 's intent but didn't have any time frame on intent to
purchase. Would look at amount of money that is in City 's Sanitation
Di strict fund--some $120,000 in fund. Construction costs are some
$46 ,000. In addition would be some administ rative and engineering and
inspection costs. Said he had a discussion with Mr. Jackman regarding
this.
-6-
Jackman said that he had briefly discussed this with his staff and
City has no objection. Would like their standard agreement if
developer wants to hook up to the sewer .
Porter asked how many people woul d be involved in this establishment .
Was answered about 200 at the most . Nissan added that there was an
assessment district there also.
Mr . Harper further reported that one other thing that he was directed
to discusss was the possiblity of acquiring the line from the C:ity .
Asked Mr. Fonley regarding this and the recommendation of their staff
is not to sell the l ine. Nissan added that they didn't want to sell
until they get rest of people to annex to City.
Porter said he didn 't see any objection in letting the people hook
into this line and Mr . Harper said we have no objection.
Jackman stated that annexation is feasible as property is contiguous
to border of City. Sal tarell i said he supported City 's position.
Jackman added that the standard agreement states that developer would
not oppose annexation if it becomes a possibility and it would become
a possibility immediately because City is completing annexations
right up to that area .
Mr. Perrin of Restaurant Adventures then commented that standard form
of agreement says that we N~Ni~ desire to annex to the City and we
would basically do so, and this is not fundamentally our desire to do
so . De sire to remain under the control of the County and not, at this
time , to make any commitments to go into any city. Don 't have any
feeling against Orange but would definitely like to stay with County .
Going back down the other way to hook into sewer in Crawford Canyon
would be more expensive but that would be the way we would attempt to
go if it is possible to get all the other services along with that .
Said if District was talking some $46 ,ooo+, he was not completely in
a position to discuss figur es but would think that possib ly they
could make some arrangements with the Sanitation Districts that might
be condusive to get them to move along the line of acquisition at
this ~time .
Porter then asked Chairman Saltarelli if he had any further comment
and Saltarelli stated that h e u nderst ood that Mr . Perrin was asking
the Sanitation Districts to buy the line so he can avoid annexation
to City of Orange and Orange is not ready to sell the line at this
time. Don 't have any choice . Arrangeme nts have to be made wi th City
of Orange.
Nissan stated that we can acqu ire line even if they don 't want to
sell but not iN a friendly way to go . Saltarelli asked if it benefits
the District to do this at this time . Nisson said it benefits the
people in the District rather than City of Orange and that is why we
can take it away from Orange .
Perrin added that they could run sewer back down Crawford Canyon Road
but is somewhat an additional expense . Rather than spend funds on
sewer line with rather minimum usage , might be more beneficial to
work out a financial agreement with Sanitation Districts that would
make it to their benefit to legally acquire the line.
Porter stated that h e was not prepared to make a decision tonight
and wa nt e d some more input .
Saltare lli added that it i s a simp l e problem . If developer refuses
to connec t to City of Orange, o nly other option is to build line and
connect down to the othe::line . Would be a snap d ecision as to wh et h e r
we want to buy that trunk line through condemnation proceedings .
On the other hand , the developer n eeds a sewer connection . He can
connect to our line or he can connect to Orange 's line .
-7-
•
Clark said if there is a poss i bility the n maybe Mr. Harper should
approach the City Council formally with a request to buy this line .
There is no way to determine this evening i f they are interested
in selling . If they don 't want to sell , then have to say, do we
want it bad enough to condemn .
Saltarelli then moved that the staff be authorized to contact Jthe
City of Orange as to their desire to sell the trunk line and br i ng
that information back to the Board at the next meeting .
Porter asked if h e wanted to include in that motion conferring wit h
Mr. Perrin as we ll and Saltarell i answered , certainly . The motion
was seconded and carried.
-8-
COUNTY SANITATION .
DI STR ICTS NOS . 1, 2, 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , AND 11
DISTRICT NO . 1
Direc tors present :
Direct ors absent:
DISTRICT NO . 2
Directors prese nt:
Direct o r s absent :
DI STR I CT NO . 3
Directors present :
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO . 5
Directors present :
Direct ors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 6
Directors present :
Directors absent:
DISTRI CT NO. 7
Directors present:
Dire ctors absent :
DISTRICT NO . 1 1
Directors prese nt:
Dire ctors absent :
MINUTES . OF THE REGULAR MEETING
May 8 , 1 9 74 -7 :3 0 p .rn .
10844 Ellis Avenue .
Fount a in Valley , California
ROLL CALL
Jerry Patterson (Chairman), Robert
Battin , and Donald Saltarelli
Kerm Ri ma
Dona ld Winn (Chairman), Michael
Callah an , Dale Chaput , Ralph Clark,
John Ga r the, Beth Graham , Miriam
Kayw ood , Leonard Ma cKain , Bob Perry ,
George Scott, Joe Temple , and
Fra nc es Wood
None
Donald Fox (Chairman), Gi lb ert
Arbi so , Jr., Robert Battin , Thomas
Blackman , Edward By rne, Alvin Coen ,
No r ma n Culver , Roland Edwards ,
John Garthe , Robert Nevil , Miriam
Kaywood , Bernie Svalstad , and
France s Wood ·
Edward Byrne , Phillip Cox , and Sonia
Sonju
Don Mcinnis (Ch airman) and Ralph
Cl ark
None
Ellis Porter (C hairma n), Robert
Battin, and Don Mcinn is
Non e
Donald Sa lt arelli (Chairman),
Gabrielle Pryor , Ra lph Clark ,
J erry Patterson , Ellis Porter ,
Howard Rogers , and James J ackman
Non e
Henry Duk e (Ch a irma n), David Baker ,
and Norma Gibbs
Non e
5/8/74
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
Fred A. Harper, General Manager,
J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary,
William Clarke, Bruce Witcher,
Kris Lindstrom, John Thomas, and
Rita Brown
Director Carolyn Ewing, C. Arthur
Nissen, General Counsel, Harvey
Hunt, Milo Keith, James Maddox,
Jack Kenney, Ted Finster, Will
Lindsay, and David Perrin
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California,
was held at 7:30 p.m. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invoca-
tion, the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for
each District's Board.
* * * * * * * * * *
DISTRICTS 2; 3 1 & 11
Excerpts re Board
Appointments received
and filed
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the minute excerpts from the
Cities of Anaheim, Huntington Beach,
and Los Alamitos be received and
ordered filed; and that.the following representatives be seated
as members of the Boards:
CITY ACTIVE ALTERNATE DISTRICT(S)
Anaheim Miriam Kaywood w. J. Thom 2 & 3
Huntington Harriett M. Wieder Alvin M. Coen 3
Beach Norma B. Gibbs Alvin M. Coen 11
Henry H. Duke Alvin M. Coen 11
Los Alamitos Charles L. Long Phillip H. Cox 3
DISTRICT 1 This being the annual meeting at
Annual Election of which elections are to be held for
Chairman of the Board Chairman of each of the Boards of
Directors, the Secretary declared
the nominations in order for the office of Chairman of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1.
It was then moved and seconded: That Director Jerry M. Patterson
be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There
being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary
cast the unanimous ballot for Director Patterson as Chairman.
DISTRICT 2 This being the annual meeting at
Annual Election of which elections are to be held for
Chairman of the Board Chairman of each of the Boards of
Directors, the Secretary declared
the nominations in order for the office of Chairman of the Board
of Directors of County San~tation District No. 2.
It was then moved and seconded: That Director Donald Winn be
nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There ~
being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary
cast the unanimous ballot for Director Winn as Chairman .
. -2-
DISTRICT 3
Annual Election of
Chairman of the Board
the nominations
of Directors of
5/8/74
This being the annual meeting at
which elections are to be held for
Chairman of each of the Board0 of
Directors, the Secretary declared
in order for the office of Chairman of the Board
County Sanitation District No. 3.
It was then moved and seconded: That Director Donald L. Fox
be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There
being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary
cast the unanimous ballot for Director Fox as Chairman.
DISTRICT 5
Deferring Annual
Election of Chairman
of the Board
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Annual Election of Chairman
of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 5 be
deferred until the regular meeting of the Board on June 12, 1974.
DISTRICT 6
Annual Election of
Chairman of the Board
the nominations
of Directors of
This being the annual meeting at
which elections are to be held for
Chairman of each of the Boards of
Directors, the Secretary declared
in order for the office of Chairman of the Board
County Sanitation District No. 6.
It was then moved and seconded: That Director Ellis N. Porter
be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There
being no other nominations, the vote was poll'ed and the Secretary
cast the unanimous ballot for Director Porter as Chairman.
DISTRICT 7
Annual Election of
Chairman of the Board
the nominations
of Directors of
This being the annual meeting at
which elections are to be held for
Chairman of each of the Boards of
Directors, the Secretary declared
in order for the office of Chairman of the Board
County Sanitation District No. 7.
It was then moved and seconded: That Director Donald J.
Saltarelli be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman.
There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the
Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Saltarelli as
Chairman.
DISTRICT 11
Annual Election of
Chairman of the Board
the nominations
of Directors of
This being the annual meeting at
which elections are to be held for
Chairman of each of the Boards of
Directors, the Secretary declared
in order for the office of Chairman of the· Board
County Sanitation District No. 11.
It was then moved and seconded: That Director Henry H. Duke
be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There
being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the
Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Duke as Chairman.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular
meeting held April 10, 1974, be approved as ~ailed.
DISTRicrr 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular
meetinG held April 10, 1974, be approved as mailed .
. -3-
5/8/74
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular
meeting held April 10, 1974, be approved as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular
meeting held April 10, 1974, be approved as mailed.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular
meeting held April 10, 1974, be approved as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular
meeting held April 10, 1974, be approved as mailed.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular
meeting held April 10, 1974, be approved as mailed.
.'-".
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the
Joint Chairman
Following introduction of new Directors,
Chairman Porter announced that an
orientation program and plant tour
for Directors would be conducted on
May 30th at 5:30 p.m. and urged all Board members to attend.
The Chairman then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for
5:30 p.m., Wednesday, May 29, 1974, and invited Directors Sonia
Sonju and Bernie Svalstad to attend and participate in the
discussions.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the
General Manager
The General Manager briefly reviewed
a current report which had been.
provided each Director on the Southern
California Coastal Water Research
Project. The project is a joint effort of the County Sanitation
Districts of Orange and Los Angeles Counties, the Cities of San
Diego and Los Angeles, and the County of Ventura, to develop regional
scientific information on the coastal waters extending from Point
Conception to the Mexican border. Funding of the study is presently
$1/2 million per year to which the Districts contribute approximately
15%. .
Mr. Harper referred Directors to an item on the Supplemental Agenda
regarding consideration of a resolution endorsing the Clean
Water Bond Act of 1974 (Proposition 2) which is on the June 4th
ballot. He briefly reviewed the intent of the Proposition which
is to provide bond funds to assist local communities in financing
construction of wastewater quality control facilities to meet
the objectives of the 1972 Amendments to the Water Pollution
Control Act and advised Directors that if they chose to adopt the
proposed resolution, their names and the municipalities which they
represent would be released as favoring the Proposition.
The General Manager reported that the staff had conducted a briefing
on the JPL carbon process experimental project. In attendance
at the meeting were representatives from the Environmental
Protection Agency, State Water Resources Control Board, the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Jet
-4-
5/8/74
Propulsion Laboratory. The reactivated carbon process· appears
to offer a technological breakthrough in wastewater treatment.
The Districts' staff and JPL personnel have jointly proposed
that EPA and the State Board provide a $3.5 million Step I grant
to scale-up the existing pilot plant from 10,000 gallons per day
to 1,000,000 gallons per day in order that full-scale design
criteria and cost effectiveness may be determined.. Unde~ the
proposed program~ this evaluation would take approximately three
years. However, following the briefing and demonstration of the
pilot plant, EPA representatives, while being quite enthusiastic
about the process, expressed a desire to expedite the scale-up
work. The State has requested that our Project Report submitted
on March 1st be amended to request authorization for further
development of the JPL process.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the
General Counsel
The General Counsel reported that,
pursuant to the resolution adopted
by the Boards of Districts Nos, 2,
3, and·7 expressing concern that
State legislators be subject to the same requirements as local
elected officials under the recently adopted "Conflicts of
Interest" legislation, Senator James Whetmore had forwarded a
communication advising that State officials are covered by the
Act. The State Supreme Court is presently reviewing the
constitutionality of said Act.
With regard to pending ~awsuits, Mr. Nissan reported that in
the case of District No. 3 vs. Amercoat, the court had ruled
in favor of the defendants. In the case of Peter Kiewit Sons' Co.
the suit had been settled as previously authorized by the Boards.
He then briefly reviewed for the benefit of new Directors, the
history of the litigation on Ocean Outfall No. 2, Job No. J-10,
brought against the Districts by the contractor.
The General Counsel reported that the recent Amendments to the
Federal Fair Labor Standards Act will require payment of time
and one-half for overtime and eliminate compensatory time off
in lieu of cash remuneration for overtime services. The full.
impact of the Amendments to the Act has not, as yet, been
interpreted and Directors will be advised when further information
becomes available.
Mr. Nissan also reported on pending litigation regarding rights
of way for trunk sewer construction in District No. 2.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file
written report of
Executive Committee
ALL DISTRICTS
Accepting proposal of
Lee C. White to assist
Districts in securing
responsible "secondary
treatment" de fini ti on
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the written report of the
Executive Committee dated May 2, 1974,
be received and ordered filed.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the proposal submitted by Lee
C. White dated April 5, 1974, to
assist the Districts and other
consenting West Coast sewerage
agencies in securing an environmentally
sound and fiscally responsible Federal "secondary treatment"
definition which is consistent with the State-adopted California
Ocean Plan, on a cost-sharing basis with said consenting agencies
for a reaximum fee not to exceed $6,000 plus Districts' propor-
tionate share of actual incidental expenses.
-5-
5/8/74
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing execution of
Memorandum of Understanding
re EPA construction grant
for JPL wastewater treatment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the General Mana~er be authorized
to execute a Memorandum of Understanding
with the Jet Propulsion Laboratory
(JPL) of the California Institute of process
mental Protection
carbon wastewater
Technology in support of an Environ-
Agency construction grant for the JPL reactivate~
treatment process.
ALL DISTRICTS
Directing staff to prepare
plans and specifications
for Replacement of Interplant
Gas Line, Job No. I-4R
and that the General Manager
for said work.
ALL DISTRICTS
·Directing staff to prepare
plans and specifications
for Installation of Gas
Metering Equipment 2 Job
No. I-4-3
authorized to advertise for
ALL DISTRICTS
Directing staff to investigate
feasibility of imnroving the
quality of digester gas
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff be authorized and
directed to prepare plans and
specifications for Replacement of
Interplant Gas Line, Job No. I-4R,
be authorized to advertise for bids
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff be authorized and
directed to prepare plans and
specifications for Installation of
Gas Metering Equipment, Job No. I-4-3,
and that the General Manager be
bids for said work.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff be authorized and
directed to further investigate the
feasibility of improving the quality
of digester gas and report back to the Boards the cost effective-~
ness of removing moisture and carbon dioxide content from the
digester gas.
ALL DISTRICTS
Directing staff to
negotiate for sale of
surplus digester gas
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff be authorized and
directed to negotiate with General
Crude Oil Company, Southern California
Edison Company, and others, for the sale of any excess digester gas,
to be conditioned upon availability of said excess gas, and
incorporating an escalation clause to reflect increased demand
and an adjustment in the rates to reflect improvements in quality
of the gas supplied.
ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel reported that
Report of General Counsel a communication had been received
re Alternate Directors from the attorney for the Garden
for Sanitary Districts Grove Sanitary District inquiring
as to the interpretation of the
provisions of the Health and Safety Code for alternate Directors
for Sanitary District representatives on a Sanitation District
Board of Directors. Mr. Nissan briefly reviewed the history of
the legislation in this regard and advised Directors that, in his
opinion, the present law does not allow for alternate Sanitary
District Directors on the Board of a Sanitation District. In ~/
response to a question regarding the possibility of the Districts'
Joint Boards of Directors adopting a motion to allow Sanitary
Districts to have alternate Directors, the General Counsel advised
that this could only be acco~plished by a change of the state
law.
. -6-
5/8/74
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that
Authorizing staff to under the provisions of the 1972
continue discus~ions Amendments to the Federal Water·
with EPA and l~~QCB Pollution Control Act, a National
re proposed NPDES permit Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit must be issued
to all dischargers to navigable waters. In the State of California,
~ the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has relegated issuance
of these permits to the State Water Resources Control Board.
However, Orange County is in a rather unique situation because
our ocean outfall extends past the three-mile state limit.
Therefore, EPA, jointly with the California Regional Water
Quality Control Board, will conduct hearings on the Districts'
permit application. Our staff has previously reported to the
Boards on stipulations contained in the proposed permit which
appear to go beyond the intent of the Act. Because of our concern
and the complexities of the proposed new permit regulations, the
hearing on the permit was deferred from May 3rd to June 7th. Our
staff has been meeting with representatives of EPA, the Regional
and State Boards, State Fish and Game Commission, and State
and County Health Departments in an attempt to modify those
provisions of the permit regulations which cannot be justified.
The General Manager then introduced Kris Lindstrom, the Districts'
Environmental Specialist, who summarized the provisions of the
permit and reviewed our staff's efforts with the regulatory
agencies in this regard. ·
The Board then entered into a general discussion concerning the
proposed regulations to be ·imposed under the NPDES permit. It
was the consensus of the Directors that the staff should convey
to the regulatory agencies that the Boards will support regulations
which are fiscally sound and meet realistic environmental goals
but would vigorously oppose unfounded and fiscally irresponsible
regulations. The Boards also expressed their concern that
regulations be uniformly applied to all wastewater dischargers
throughout the state.
Following further discussion concerning the impact of the proposed
regulations on the Districts' operations and funding requirements,
it ·was moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff be authorized to continue to meet with federal and
state representatives regarding proposed NPDES permit requirements
to obtain rational permit regulations; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the staff be directed to convey the position
of the Districts' Boards of Directors regarding said regulations.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Changing disability payment
period for industrial accidents That the Boards of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 74-40, amending
Resolution No. 70-3, as amended, to change the disability payment
period for industrial accidents to comply with recent legislative
actions. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto
and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing staff to
arrance open house and
plant inspection tour
Moved, seconded; and duly carried:
That the staff be authorized to
make arrangements for an open house
and plant inspection tour of the
Districts' facilities, to be held September 25, 1974, for elected
officials and key staff members of the Districts' member agencies.
-7-
5/8/74
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving Change Order
No. 6 to plans and
specifications for
Job No. I-8-3
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 6 to the plans
and specifications for Influent
Metering and Diversion Structure at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No.
I-8-3,
E.T.I.
Change
authorizing an addition of $18,ooo.oo to the contract with
& Kordick, a Joint Venture, be approved. Copy of this
Order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file Financial
Report of Director of
Finance
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the quarterly Financial Report
of the Director of Finance for the
nine-month period ending March 31,
1974, be received, ordered filed, and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That budget transfers as recommended by the
Director of Finance be authorized.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file staff
progress report on Treatment
Plant Construction Projects
received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Certification of the General
Manager received and ordered
filed
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff progress report
dated May 2, 1974, on Treatment
Plant Construction Projects be
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the certification of the General
Manager that he has checked all bills
appearing on the agenda, found them
to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment
be received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried
by roll call vote: Approval of Joint Operating
and Capital Outlay Revolving
Fund warrant books That the Districts' Joint Operating
and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund
warrant books be approved for signature of the Chairman of
District No. 1, and that the County Auditor be authorized and
directed to pay:
Joint Operating
Capital Outlay Revolving
$122,540.52
388,234.46
$510,774.98
in accordance with the warrants listed on pages "I-1" through
"I-4", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing filing
application for Federal
and State grants
Following a brief report by the
General Manager, it was moved, seconded,
and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 74-76, authorizing filing application for Federal
and State grants for publicly-owned wastewater treatment works ~
and providing certain assurances. Certified copy of this
resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes .
. -8-
ALL DISTRICTS
Endorsing Clean Water
Bond Act of 1974
facilities, it was moved,
5/8/74
Following a general discussion regarding
the proposed Clean Water Bond Act of
1974 as it relates to State and Federal
construction funding of sewerage
seconded, and duly carried:·
That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 74-77, endorsing
the Clean Water Bond Act of 1974 (Proposition 2). Certified
copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes.
DISTRICT 1
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:47 p.m.,
May 8, 1974.
DISTRICT 5
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The
Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:47 p.m.,
May 8, 1974.
DISTRICT 6
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:47 p.m.,
May 8, 1974.
DISTRICT 11
Authorizing execution of
Quitclaim Deed to Southern
California Edison Company
re Newland Avenue Force Main
relocation
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 74-71-11> authorizing
execution of Quitclaim Deed to
Southern California Edison Company
for a portion of District's easement
which is no longer needed due to the relocation of Newland Avenue
Force Main. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto
and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 11
Approving Change Order
No. 1 to plans and
specifications for
Contract No. 11-12
Moved, seconded, and. duly carried:
That Change Order No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Slater
Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension,
Contract No. 11-12, authorizing an
addition of $745.31 to the contract with Kordick & Son, Inc., be
approved. Copy of this Change Order is attached hereto and made
a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 11
Receive and file
staff progress report
re Contract No. 11-12
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff progress report dated
May 2, 1974, on construction of the
Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension,
Contract No. 11-12, be received and ordered filed.
-9-
5/8/74
DISTRICT 11
Receive and file
staff progress report
re Contract No. 11-12
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff progress report dated
May 2, 1974, on construction of the
Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension,
Contract No. 11-12, be received and ordered filed.
DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of Suspense
Fund warrants That the Districts' Suspense Fund
warrant book be approved for
signature of the Chairman of District No. 3, and that the
County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $319,042.35,
in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II", attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of warrants
That the District's Accumulated
Capital Outlay Fund warrant book be approved for signature of the
Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed
to pay $77,679.90, in accordance with the warrants listed on
page "III", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 11
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned.
The Chairman then declared.the meeting so adjourned at 8:49 p.m.,
May 8, 19 74.
DISTRICT 3
Approving plans and
soecifications for
Contract No. 3-19
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of· Directors adopt
Resolution No. 74-72-3, approving
plans and specifications for Imperial
Relief Interceptor, Reaches 22 & 23, Contract No. 3-19, and
authorizing the General Manager to establish the bid date upon
receipt of necessary permits from the State Division of Highways.
Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 3
Receive and file Draft
Environmental Impact
Report for Knott Interceptor,
REaches 5 through 8
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Draft Environmental Impact
Report for the Knott Interceptor,
Reaches 5 through 8, dated May, 1974,
be received and ordered filed; and
that the staff be directed to file a Notice of Completion in
accordance with the Local Guidelines Implementing the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That June 26, 1974, be established as the date
for which all comments must be received on said Environmental
Impact Report.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Receive and file
staff progress report That the staff progress report "-"'
re Contract No. 3-18 dated May 2, 1974, on construction
of the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4,
Contract No. 3-18, be received and ordered filed.
-10-
5/8/74
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of warrants
That the District's Operating Fund
and Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund warrant books be approved for
signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized
and directed to pay:
Operating Fund $ 300.00
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 475,,796.30
$476,096.30
in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II", attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 3
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The
Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:50 p.m.,
May 8, 1974.
DISTRICT 2
Approving plans and
specifications for
Contract No. 2-18
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 74-73-2, approving
plans and specifications for
Carbon Canyon Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-18, and that the
General Manager be authorized to advertise for bids on June 4,
1974. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and
made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2
Approving Change Order
No. 13 to plans and
specifications for
Contract No. 2-14-1
Following a brief staff report on the
sizing of the Santa Ana River Inter-
ceptor, it w~s moved, seconded, and
duly carried:
That Change Order No. 13 to the.plans
and specifications for the Santa Ana River Interceptor from
Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1,
authorizing an addition of $11,544.00 to the contract with
Sully-Miller Contracting Company, be approved. Copy of this
Change Order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2
Report on Public Hearing
re Santa Ana River
Interceptor, Reach 3
The.General Manager reported on
hearings conducted May 7~h by the
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority
(SAWPA) on the remaining reach of
the Santa Ana River Interceptor,
from La Palma Avenue to the Orange County line. Mr. Harper then
briefly reviewed the history of the Interceptor which will be
constructed by the District to accommodate increasing flows
within District No. 2 and provides a 30 mgd capacity to remove
salt brines from the upper basin which are presently contaminating
the underground water supply. This project is an integral part
of the State's master plan for improving the water quality in the
Santa Ana River Basin.
During the discussion which followed, the Directors were advised
of the anticipated schedule for processing the grant applications
for remaining reaches of the Interceptor. Approval by the State
Water Resources Control Board is expected during the month of
August, following which the matter will be further considered by
the Board of Directors of District No. 2.
-11-
~/8/74
DISTRICT 2
Authorizing payment to
Oranee County Flood Control
District re Contract No.
2-14-1
January, 1974, in connection
River Interceptor from Plant
No. 2-14-1, be authorized.
DISTRICT 2
Receive and file staff
progress report re
Contracts Nos. 2-14-1
and 2-14-2
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That payment to Orange County Flood
Control District in the amount of
$844.48 for inspection services for
the period November, 1973, through
with construction of the Santa Ana
No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract
Following a brief discussion, it was
moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff progress report dated
May 2, 1974, on construction of the
Santa Ana River Interceptor from
Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1,
and the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Katella Avenue to La
Palma Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-2, be received and ordered filed.
DISTRICT 2
Approval of warrants
Following a brief discussion, it
was moved, seconded, and duly
carried:
That the District's Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund warrant book
be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County
Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $566,748.02, in
accordance with the warrants listed on page "II", attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board cf
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The '--'
Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:03 p.m.,
May 8, 1974.
DISTRICT 7
Approving Change Orders
Nos. 1, 2, and 3 re
Contract No. 7-3A-l,
7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-3E-l
7-3E-l, authorizing changes
Inc., be approved:
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the following Change Orders
to the plans and specifications for
Diversion Structures, Contract
No. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, and
to the contract with Halopoff & Sons,
Change Order No. 1 -Addition of $1,064.88
Change Order No. 2 -Adjustment of Engineer's quantities
and addition of $690.60
Change Order No. 3 -Time extension of 16 calendar days
Copies of these Change Orders are attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Accepting Contract
No. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, That the Board of Directors adopt '-11
7-3B-l, 7-3E-l as Resolution No. 74-74-7, accepting
complete Di version Structures, Contract no.
7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-3E-l as
complete; authorizing execution of Notice of Completion upon
receipt of letters of compliance from agencies issuing permits
in connection with said contract; and approving Final Closeout
Agreement. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto
and made a part of these minutes.
-12-
DISTRICT 7
Receive and file Draft
EnvironmentRl Im.£.Q:_ct Report
for Tustin-Orange Trunk
Sewer, Reaches 10 through 18
5/8/74
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Draft Environmental Impact
Report for the Tustin-Orange Trunk
Sewer, Reaches 10 through 18,-be
received and ordered filed; and
that the staff be directed to file a Notice of Completion in
accordance with the Local Guidelines Implementing the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That June 26, 1974, be established as the final
date for which all comments must be received on said Environmental
Impact Report.
DISTRICT 7
Authorizing initiation of
proceedings re Annexation
No. 4o
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 74-75-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex
approximately 4.38 acres of territory to the District in the
vicinity of Santiago Boulevard and Walnut Avenue (Proposed
Annexation No. 40 -Tract No. 8266 to County Sanitation District
No. 7). Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and
made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7
Receive and file letter
from James A. and Dorothy G.
Moulton re annexation of
territory
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the letter from James A. and
Dorothy G. Moulton dated April 10,
1974, requesting annexation of
approximately one acre of territory
in the vicinity of Cowan Heights Drive between Briar Lane and
Rangeview Drive, be received, ordered filed, and referred to
staff for study and recommendation. ·
DISTRICT 7
Further consideration of
request of Restaurant
Adventures, Inc., and
directing staff to contact
City of Orange re acquisition
of sewer in Chapman Avenue
The General Manager reported on
discussions with the City of Orange
staff regarding alternative means
by which property in an unincorporated
area of District 7 at the intersection
of Chapman Avenue and Crawford Canyon
Road could be served. One alternative
is to connect to the City line in
Chapman Avenue. A second alternative would be for the developer
to construct a line to connect to the Crawford Canyon Sub-trunk
Sewer approximately 900 feet away. Following a general discussion
by Directors of the alternatives available for serving the property
in question, during which Mr. David Perrin of Restaurant
Adventures, Inc. addressed the Board with regard to the position
of his firm on this matter, it was moved, seconded, and duly
carried:
That the staff be directed to formally inquire of the Orange
City Council if it is the City's desire to sell its interest in
the Chapman Avenue Sewer located east of Solano Avenue.
DISTRICT 7
Receive and file claim
of Southern California Gas
Company re College Avenue
Force Main
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the claim of Southern California
Gas Company dated April 24, 1974,
in the amount of $2,126.10 re
alleged damages incurred by construc-
tion of the College Avenue Force Main, be received, ordered filed,
and referred to General Counsel for recommendation.
-13-
5/8/74
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of warrants
That the District's Facilities
Revolving Fund warrant book be approved for signature of the
Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed
to pay $29,297.09, in accordance with the warrants listed on
page "III", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The
Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:25 p.m.,
May 8, 1974.
-14-
ards o Directors of
ation Districts Nos. 1,
7, and 11
WARRANT NO.
22805
22806
22807
~808 ~809
·22810
22811
t 22812
. 22813
22814
22815
22816
22817
22818
22819
22820
22821
22822
22823
22824
22825
22826
22827
22828
22829
22830
22831
!832
~833
22834
22835
22836
22837
22838
22839
22840
22841
22842
22843
22844
22845
22846
22847
22848
-22849
; 22850
22851
22852
22853
22854
22855
22856
'"'~857
~858
22859
22860
22861
22862
22863
22864
22865
22866
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Air Conditioning Supply Co., Freight
All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings & Pipe Supplies
American Kleaner Mfg. Co., Inc., Valve
American Pneumatic Tool Co., Machine Equipment
American Society for Testing & Materials, Technical
Manuals
City of Anaheim, Power
Anaheim Truck & Transfer, Freight
The Anchor Packing Co., Gaskets
Apco Supply, Hardware
Aquatic Center, Safety Supplies
Associated Concrete Products, Inc., Manhole Sections
Azusa Western, Concrete
Bank of America, Bond & Coupon Collection
Banning Battery Co., Batteries
Beckman Instruments, Inc., Cable
Bell Pipe & Supply Co., Pump & Valves
Bender Machine, Inc., Engine Repair
Blower Paper Co., Janitorial & Maintenance Supplies
$
AMOUNT
33.50
872.39
11.82
1,168.81
35. 75
28.73
6.64
9.26
6.15
10.00
57.24
293.25
138.45
261.83
80.14
443.93
732.66
Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Engine Parts & Magneto Repair
Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams
Broadlick Art Supply, Certificate Framing
197.58
389.44
39.00
32.70
28.22 Bruning Division, Drafting Supplies
C & R Reconditioning Co., Engine Repair & Pump Parts
CWPCA, Annual Conference Expense
Cal's Cameras, Photo Supplies
Cal State Seal Co., Flange Gaskets
California Collator Sales, Binding Supplies
Leonard Carney, CWPCA Conference Expense
695.0:l
208.0J
37.08
78.13
56 .16
John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services (MO 4-10-74)
Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co., Compressor Parts
79.70
5,021.51
405 .05
32.86
271.60
34.98
1,269.28
575 .14
22.36
255.68
William N. Clarke, CWPCA Conference Expense
College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials & Hardware
Concrete Tie, Building Materials
Consolidated Electric Distr., Electric Supplies
F. B •. Cook Corp., Bulkhead Removal
Copeland Motors, Inc., Truck Parts
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
Costa Mesa County Water District
Mr. Crane, Crane Rental
Crest Leasing, Leased Vehicle - 4 Months
Crown Controls, Inc., Electric Cable
Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies
Deaver Manufacturing Co., Truck Repair
John M. Deck, Equipment Parts
Diamond Core Drilling Co., Concrete Sawing
Ducommun Metals & Supply Co., Steel
Dunn-Edwards Corp., Paint Supplies
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies
Enchanter, Inc., Oceanographic Services (MO 2-13-74)
Engineers Sales Service Co., Inc., Pump Parts
Ensign Products Co., Freight
Enterprise Printing, Printing Supplies & Printing
Fischer & Porter Co., Metering Equipment & Training
Clifford A. Forkert, Construction Survey PW-033
City of Fountain Valley, \'later
William H. Fox, Employee Mileaee & CWPCA Conference
Freeway Machine & Welding Shop, Machining
Larry Fricker Co., Inc., Weed Killer
Gar-Wood L.A. Truck Equip., Inc., Truck Equipment
Garden Grove Lumber & Cement, Building Material ·
Gasket Manufacturing Co., Gaskets
General Electric Supply Co., Electric Supplies
I-1
6.oo
407.69
586.34
165.33
869.52
105.00
51.42
45.00
175.15
22.0J
620.87
3,20~.oo
138.86
17.15
113.88
1,125.92
826.05
40.00
Expense 66.85
1,033.50
110.25
83.21
172.99
68.58
1,050.72
WARRANT NO.
22867
22868
22869
22870
22871
22872
22873
22874
22875
22876
22877
22878
22879
22880
22881
22882
22883
22884
22885
22886
22887
22888
22889
22890
22891
22892
22893
22894
22895
22896
22897
22898
22899
22900
22901
22902
22903
22904
22905
22906
22907
22908
22909
22910
22911
22912
22913
22914
22915
22916
22917
22918
22919
22920
22921
22922
22923
2292L~
22925
22926
22927
22928
22929
IN FAVOR OF
General Telephone
Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine Contract 1-1-73
Golden West Fertilizer Co., Grit Removal
Graybar Electric Co., Electric Supplies & Hardware
Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Repair
Hach Chemical Co., Inc., Chemicals
Halsted & HoGgan, Inc., Pump Parts
Allan Hancock Foundation, Technical Manuals
Fred A. Harper, Various Mtg., COD & Conference Expenses
Harrisons & Crosfield, Inc., Chemical Coagulants
Heathkit Electronic Center, Communication Equipment
L. Heitman Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Rental
Hercules, Inc., Chemical Coagulants
Hertz Car Leasing Division, Leased Vehicles
Hewlett Packard Co., Equipment Repair
James E. Hoagland Co. & Hoagland Engineering Co., Equip.
Rental & Piping
Honeywell, Inc., Telemetering Supplies
House of Trophies, Director's Plaque
Howard Supply Co., Pipe Supplies, Boiler Parts & Valves
Hundley Company, Inc., Electronic Equipment & Controls
City of Huntington Beach, Water
Huntington Beach Equipment Rentals, Equipmen~ Rental
Huntington Laboratories, Inc., Lab Supplies
Industrial Asphalt, Asphalt
Ingersol-Rand, Compressor Parts
Inland Nut & Bolt Co., Hardware
International Harvester Co., Truck Parts
Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies & Fittings
Kilsby Tubesupply Co., Steel
Kleen Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies
Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware & Tools
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Equip. Parts & Hardware
L & N Uniform, Uniform Services - 2 Months
Lacal Company, Inc., Lubricant
Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Equipment Parts
AMOUNT
2,738.65
4,014.64
1,128.00
157.07
23.69 123 .r·.
l~O.~
t+l.74
270.17
689 .OC>-
105 .95.
1, 453. 50•
315.88
572.96
67.50
1,416.69
221.03
25.21
3,833.36
369.57
23.59
574.63
32.25
10.29
281.53
520.86
33.55
284 .91
63.32
360.~7
415.~
1,510.46
4,405.40
24.68
Kris Lindstrom, Employee Mileage & CWPCA Conference Expense·
R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., Paving Materials
McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Hardware
705.78
102.08
68.90
60.91
Marine Biological Consultants, Inc., Ocean Research &
Monitoring (MO 11-14-73)
Missimers, Inc., Hardware
Moore Products Co., Compressor Parts
Morrison Co., Check Valves
National Chemsearch, Solvent & Cleaner
National Fire Protection Association, Manuals
National Lumber & Supply, Inc., Building Materials
Nates Saw & Lawnmower Shop, Saw Sharpening
City of Newport Beach, Water
C. Arthur Nissen, General Counsel Retainer
OFCCO Construction Co., Inc., Boiler Repair
Office Equipment Co., Equipment Repair
Orange County Stamp Co., Rubber Stamps
Osterbauer Compressor Service, Compressor Parts
Pacific Telephone
Norman Parsons, Employee Mileage
M. c. Patten & Co., Inc., Control Repair & Steam Traps
Jose Pena, Weed Removal
Philadelphia Gear Corp., Pump Gear E-067 (MO 5-2-73)
Postmaster
Lee Potter Comp:;iny, Inc., Maintenance Supplies
Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage
Rapid Color, Inc., Printing
Red's Frame & ln1eel, Truck Repair
The Republic Supply Co. of Calif., Hardware
I-2
4,904.37
239.22
44.17
675.36
1,086.75
3.93.
99 .19·
14. 70·
388. 92!
80~.oo
248.21
18.oo
-21. 76
102.75
462.41
15.7'3
309~ 30J .0::)
7,372.30
500.08
195. 78
38.10
249. r-(4
25.13
76.60
WARRANT NO.
22930
22931
22932
22933
22934
'2935 ~2936
> 22937
. 22938
' 22939
t 22940
' 22941
22942
22943
22944
22945
22946
22947
22948
22949
22950
22951
22952
22953
22954
22955
22956
22957
. 22958
22959
~960
¥2961
22962
22963
22964
22965
22966
22967
22968
22969
22970
22971
22972
IN FAVOR OF
Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Parts & Freight $
Royal Plumbing & Heating Co., Lateral Repair
San Jose Hyatt House, CWPC.A Conference Expense
Santa Ana Blueprint Co., Printing
Santa Ana Engraving Co., Printing Supplies
Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Chemicals
Scientific Products, Lab Supplies
Scott Refrigeration Service, Inc., Air Cond. System Repair
City of Seal Beach, Water
Richard J. Shaffer, Warehouse & Purchasing Study
Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies
Signal Flash Co., Barricade Rental
Fred Sinasek, Employee Mileage
Singer Business Machines, Maintenance .Agreement
South Orange Supply, Piping Supplies
Southern Calif. Edison
Southern Calif. Gas Co.
Southern Calif. Water Co.
Sparkletts Drinking Water Co., Bottled Water
Speed-E .Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Standard Oil co·. of· Calif., ·Gasoline
Sully Miller Contracting Co., Backfill Material
Surveyors Service Co., Survey Supplies
J. Wayne Sylvester, CASA Meeting Expense
Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage & Supplies Reimbursement
Taylor-Dunn, Equipment Parts
Technical Book Co., Technical Manual
Techni-Tool, Inc., Tools
John Thomas, CWPC.A Conference Expense
Triangle Steel & Supply Co~, Steel
U. S. Equipment Co., Inc., Compressor Parts
Union Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline & Services
United Auto Parts, Truck Parts
United Reprographics, Inc., Printing
Utility Body Co., Truck Parts
Valve & Primer Corp., Valves
John R. Waples R.S., Odor Consultant
Warren & Bailey Co., Inc., Fittings
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc., Engine Parts
West Print, Printing
Wilson Engine & Equipment Co., Engine Parts
Russell Wold, Employee Mileage
Xerox Corp., Reproduction Services
AMOUNT
1,116.22
48.oo
252.11
89.37
7.95
54.48
54.16
110.16
20.29
400.00
1,987.33
334.3~
47.58
32.75
68.50
35,745.37
1,290.17
3.00
90.72
284.51
3,645.68
44.77
28.78
33.51
176.15
119.79
19.61
120.81
46.60
3,281.08
76.22
6.07
369.85
50.35
84.57
. 186 .56
218.20
73.56
47.26
58.60
232.72
123.48
1,045.49
TOT.AL JOINT OPERATING $ 122,540.52
I-3
WARRANT NO.
22973
22974
229~(5
22976
22977
22978
22979
2 2980
22981
22982
22983
22984
22985
22986
22987
22988
CAPI TAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Almquist Tool & Equ ipment Co ., Too l s
Tommy Ayres Ch e vro l et , New Trucks (MO 2 -1 3 -74 )
J ohn Ca r o llo Engrs ., En g inee ring -Pl ant Construction
Co nst r uctors Suppl y Co ., Tools
De corating Trends I nt 1 l., Window Blinds
E .T .I . & Ko rdi ck, Contractor I -8 -3
E.T.I . & Kordick, Retention Release Contracto r P2 -ll-l
Hemi sphe r e Constructors, Co ntra ctor P2 -21
Joe Kay Des i gn & Const ructio n Co ., Retention Release
Contractor PW-J34
LBWS , Inc ., Welding Ma ch ine
Motorola, Inc., Co mmunication Equi pment
J. Ray Construction Co ., Contracto r J-13
SSP Truck Equipment, I nc ., Truck Bodies
Twining Laboratories, Compaction Tests J-13
United Repro g raphics, Inc ., Plans & Spec s Pl -16
Ziebarth & Zi ebarth & Alper, Re tention Release J -4 -1
TOTAL CAPITA L OUTLAY REVO LVING
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF
I-4
AMOUNT
$ 621 .27
5,704.92
26 ,176 .68
337 .,
20 0 ._.,
54' 900 .oo .
63 ,302 .40 ·.
53,42J .65 ·
6 8 5 .2 0;
813 .38
1,460 .55
1 38,058 .57
1,802 .00
200.00
3,137.60
37,J.n3 .35
$ 388, 234 . J.~6
$ 510,774.98
DISTRICT NO . 2
ACC UMULATED CAP ITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
WA RR ANT NO . I N FAVOR OF
22989
22990
City of Anaheim, Facility Re location 2-14-2 $
AMOUNT
1 ,731 .89
871.8 2
161 .2 5
1,758 .00
470,202 .30
2?091
C...._;92
22 993
22994
~2995
~2996
229 9 7
22998
22999
2 JO
23001
23002
..
23003
2 3004
Clean Water Consultant s , Eng ineering Service Anaheim
Forebay Project Phas e II
County of Orange , Compaction Testing 2-14-1 and 2-14-2
Epimenia Diaz and Mig uel Gomez , Easement 2-14-1
Kasler Corporation & L .H. Woods & Sons, Contractor 2-1 4-2
Lowry and Associates, Engineering Se rvi ce 2-14-3 & 2-1 5 ,
Construct ion Survey 2-14-1 & 2-14-2
Orange County Flood. Con trol District, Inspecti on 2-14-1
Safeco Ti tle Insurance, Easement 2 -14-1
Sully Miller Cont racting Company , Co ntractor 2 -14-1
Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Inspection 2-14-2
DISTRICT NO . 3
OPERATING FU ND WARRANTS
I N FAVO R OF
C. Arthur Ni ssan, Legal Serv ic es Amercoa.t Suit
AC CUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
I N FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Service 3 -19 , 3-20 -1,
3-20 -2 , 3-20 -3 , Co n struct i on Survey 3-18, Design
Survey 3 -20 -1, 3-20 -2
Te st ing Enginee r s , Inc ., P ipe Inspection 3 -18
A.G. Tu t o r Co., Inc . & N.M. Salib a, Contractor 3-18
DIS TR ICTS NOS . 3 & 11
SUSPE NSE FUND WARRANTS
I N FAVO R OF
J . F. Shea Company, I nc ., Contractor 3 -1 7
County of Orange , Compact ion Testing 3-17
II
$
$
1 4 ,619 .7 5
844 .48
1 5.00
74,758 .53
1,785 .00
566,748 .02
300 .00
$ 45,647 .50
2 ,080 .00
428,068 .80
$ 475,796.30
$ 476,096 .30
$ 318,972 .64
69 .71
$ 319,0 42 .35
DISTRic rr NO . 7
FA CILITIES HEVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
WA RRANT NO . IN FAVOR OF
23005
23006
23007
23008
23009
23010
23011
Boyle Engineering, P reliminary Engineering 7 -6 -5
Ha.lopoff and Sons , Inc., Contractor 7 -3A -l , 7 -3A -2 ,
7 -3B -l , 7 -3E -l
DISTRICT NO . 11
ACC UMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
County of Orange, Compaction Tes ting 11-12
Huntington Cap ital Corporation , Refund Annexation Fees
Kordick and Son , Inc ., Contractor 11 -12
Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Inspec tion 11 -12
Twining Laboratories, Compaction Testing 11 -12
III
$
AMOUNT
4 ,337 .50
24,959 .59
$ 29,297 .c.v
$ 100 .59
2,772 .00
73,650 .8 1
312 .00
844 .50
$ 77,679 .90