Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-05-08l COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) May 2, 1974 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 Gentlemen: TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held: WEDNESDAY EVENING, MAY 8, 1974 AT 7:30 P.M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA Tentative adjournments prior to next regular meeting: Executive Committee -5:30 p.m., May 28, 1974 Orientation for new Directcrs -5:30 p.m., May 30, 1974 MANAG ER~S AG EN DA REP ORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Cal i fornia JOINT BO A RDS REGULAR MEETING Wedn·e sday , May 8·; ·197 4 · T:3o· ·p·.m . Post O ffice Box 8127 10844 Ellis Ave n ue Fou n ta in Volley, Cal if., 9270 8 Tele phones: Area Code 71 4 5 '4 0-2 910 962-2 4 11 For the new Directors who may not be familiar with our procedures, the General Manager submits an agenda report prior to each meeting, together with a formal agenda, to provide back- ground information nec essary f o r the principal items of business to be taken up. Please bring this material with yo u to the meeting. Thi s report is for the next Joint meeting of the Boards of Di rectors of Districts Nos . 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, which will be held on Wednesday, May 8th, at 7:30 p .m., in the Districts' office at the above address. At each of these Joint meetings, the Boards take up items relating to joint operations of all the Dis - t r icts and the individual Boards also take action on current business of their resp ective Districts. The Board of District No . 8 meets quarterly in July, October: J a nuary, and April . ************** The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine it e ms which appear o n the enc losed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanator y. Warrant lists are no t attached to the agenda since they are made up immedi a tely preceding the meeting, but will appear in the supplemental agenda available at the meeting. Joint Boards No . 3 -Seating of New Direc tor s :- Our office is currently being advised of recent elections of new mayors, appo int ments of alte rnates to the mayors, and other new Directors . A list of Directors and alternates compil ed from inform ation r ece ived to date will be available at the meeting. Nos . 4 through 10 -Annual Election of Districts' Chairmen: In accordance with the Districts ' standa rd pr ocedures , a Cha i rman for eac h Distri ct Board is elected annually at the May meeting . The Joint Ch a irman and Vice Joint Chairman are elected in July, following nominations at the June meeting .· The Cha irmen for the past year were as follows: District No. Director Representing 1 Jerry Patterson City o f Santa Ana 2 Robert Nevil City of La Habra 3 Donald Fox City of Brea 5 Don Mcinnis City of Newport Beach 6 Ellis Porter Costa Mesa Sani tary District 7 Don Smith City of Orange Don Saltarelli Chm . Pro Tern since March 13th City of Tustin 11 Henry Duke City of Huntington Beach For the information of the new Directors , the Districts' re gulations provide that each Chairman automatically becomes a member of the Executive Committee which ord i narily meets monthly at the call of the Joint Chairman . This Committee, which is the on ly standing committee of the Directors, also includes the Joint Chairman , Vic e Joint Chairman , and a representative of the County Board of Supervisors . Its function is to study and make recommendations to the Joint Boards concerning Joint Districts ' matters , such as : budgets , salaries, personnel, policies, etc . No. 1 3 -Report of the Joint Chairman . An orientation program is being planned for new Directors t o assist them in learning about the Districts and how they function . We have selected 5 :3 0 p .m., Thursday , May 30th , as a tent a tive time and date to tour the treatment plants and hold a session o n the make - up of the Boards as well as a discussion of the long -range plans and objectives of the Districts . No . 16 -Report of the Executive Committee and Actions Thereon . The Committee met on the evening of April 23rd; however , in the absence of a quorum, the Committee was unable to officially take up any matters on its agenda . A report of the meeting , inc l uding a consensu s of the Committee membe rs present , is included for all activ e Directors. No. 20 -Staff Report o n Proposed National Pollutant Dischar ge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Regulations . As previously reported , the staff has h ad several meetings with representatives of EPA and the Regional Water Quality Control Board , conc erning the requirements which have been pr oposed by them to be -2- included in the Districts' NPDES Permit. Because of the complexity of 'the pro posed requir ements , they have agreed to recomm end a con- tinuance of the May 3rd he ar ing to June 7th. This will provide ample time for t he J o int Boards to consider the new requir ements. On Wednesday, we will report on the May 3rd hearing discussions and staff recommendations for changes to the proposed requirements which may be more meaningful to the Districts. No . 22 -Report of the General Counsel re : Sani tary Districts ' Represent ation o n the Boards of the Sanitation Districts. The attorney for the Garden Grove San i tar y District has sub- mitt ed an opinion to o ur Districts concerning the p rovisions o f Section 4730 o f the Ca lifornia Health and Safety Code insofar as th ey pertain to sanitary distr ict representati on on the Sanitation District Boards . The written opinion has been forwarded to the San i tation Distric ts' General Counsel for a re port. Mr . Nisson has been in touch with the Garden Grove Sanitary District atto r ney and will be report- ing t o the Boards on this matter Wednesday ev ening . No . 23 -Open House and Plant Inspect i on Tour f or Public Officials. Several years ago, the Boards of Dire ctors hosted a very successful open house and plant inspection tour for elected publ ic officials throughout the County. This proved to be very beneficial in di sseminating the Districts ' program to provide modern wastewater treatment and dispos a l facilities . The action appearing on the agenda authorizes the staff t o make arrangements for another open house and plant inspection tour to be held We d nesday , September 25th for all e l ected officials and key staff members of the Dis - tric ts ' member agencies . No. 24 -Change Order No . 6 to Job No . I -8 -3. This Change Order authorizes an add ition of $1 8 ,000 to the bontract with E .T .I . & Kordick , a joint venture , for Influent Metering and Di version Structure at Reclamation Plant No. 1 . · This addition covers the installation of a rolling gate with appurten- ances , and 1 2 ,000 square feet of paving . It is the staff 's r ecom - mendation that this Change Order be approve d. No . 25 -Financial Report for the Nine -Mo nth Period Ended March 31. Included with the age nd a materia l is a financial report prepared by the Districts ' Director of Finance for the first nine months of this fiscal year. It appears that a11 · Funds will operate we ll within the ir bud g et a l locations; however , the r eport contains recommend ations for budget transfers between certain accounts in the Joint Op e rating Fund to cover anticipated cost ove.r-runs for the fourth quarter of 1 973 -74 , and transfers of unappropriated re - serves in Districts N os~ 7 and 11. -3- District No. 11 No. 40 -Authorizing Execution of a Quitclaim Deed. . The action appearing on the agenda quitclaims a portion of the Di strict 's easement over Ed i son property which is no longer needed due to the relocation of the Newland Avenue F or ce Ma in. It is the staff 's rec ommendation that Resolution No . 74-71-11 be approved. No. 41 -Change Order No. 1 to Cont ract No. 11-12. Th e act ion appearing on the agenda under this item authorizes an addition of $745 .31 to the contract with Kordick and Son, Inc ., for utility relocation in connection with the Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension. The staff recommends that the Change Order be approved . District No . 3 No. 47 -Approval of Pl ans and Specifi cations for Imperial Relief Interceptor Sewer, Reaches 22 and 23, Contract No . 3 -1 9 . The Distri ct 's engineers have completed the Plans and Speci - fications for Contract No . 3 -1 9 . The resolution appearing in the agenda approves the Plans and Specifications and authorizes adver- tising for b ids upon receipt of permits from the State Division of Hi ghways. The sewer will be installed in Imperial Highway. The engineer's estimate is $590 ,000. No. 48 -Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Kn ott Intercept or , Reaches 5 throug h 8. The action appearing on the agenda authorizes the filing of a Notice of Comple tion of the draft Environmental Impact Report for the proposed c o nstruction of the Knott I nterc eptor . The tot al costs for Reaches 5 through 8 of the Knott Interceptor are expected to be about $1 0 million . The r oute of the interceptor runs in Golden West Street, Knott Avenue, and Artesia Street . The project wi ll extend from Westminster Avenue and Golden West in the City of Westminster, to Artesia and Knott Avenues in the City of Buena Park . In gen eral , the pipe size wil l be 66 " inside diameter and capable of handling 70 million gal lons of wastewater per day . Upon filing the Notic e of Completion of t he draft report, copies of the report will be forwarded to the affected public agenci es for the ir comments . District No . 2 No . 53 -Approvin g Plans and Speci fications for Carbon Canyon Interc e ptor Sewer , Contract No . 2-1 8 . The Plans and Specificat i ons have been completed for Contract No . 2-1 8 , and· i t is recommended that standard Resol uti on No . 74-73-2 be approved, which authorizes advertising for bids on June 4th. The -4- engineer's estimate for this project is $1,404,000. This contract is one of three which, when completed, will divert sewage flows from the overloaded State College Boulevard system. No. 54 -Change Order No. 13 to ·contract No. 2-14-1. The Change Order appearing in the supporting agenda material authorizes the addition of $11,544 to the cpntract as provided by the specifications for additional rock bedding. It is the staff's recommendation that the Change Order be approved. No. 55 -Staff Report on Public Hearings Conducted by the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA), on Reach 3 of the Santa Ana River Interceptor. Two public hearings are scheduled on May 7th for the purpose of discussing the merits and alternatives relating to the final _ phases of constr~ction of the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor. The staff has sent notice~ of the hearings to the Directors during the past several weeks. We plan to report on the results of the public hearing on Wednesday. District No. 7 Nos. 61 and 62 -Closeout of Contract No. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l and 7-3E-l. The Change Orders to the Plans and Specifications appearing in Agenda Item No. 61 authorize payment for additional work and adjustment of engineer 's quantities as well .as an extension of time of 16 calendar days. The detailed Change Orders are included in the supporting agenda material. It is recommended that they be approved. Item No. 62 approves the Final Closeout Agreement and authorizes recording of the Notice of Completion . The total cost of this project is $27,732.88. No. 63 -Draft Environmental Impact Report for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reaches 10 through 18. The Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer will serve the central po~tion of the District north of the Santa Ana Freeway. The proposed trunk sewer will relieve the District's existing North Trunk and subtrunks which presently serve this area and are currently flowing at or near peak capacity. The total length of the proposed Tustin-Orange Trunk i s 48,470 feet or 9.2 miles. The sewers will vary i n size from 27 inches to 18 inches. The estimated total project cost is $2 ,314,000 . Upon authorization of Notice of Completion of the Draft Environmental Impact Report, all affected agencies wil l receive copies of the re- port and will be asked to comment prior to June 26th. It is recom- mended that the action app e aring in the agenda be approved . -5- No . 64 -Pr oposed Annexation No . 40 -Tract No . 8266 to Dis t rict No . 7 . Th e p r operty owners of 4.38 ac r es in the v i cinity of Sant i ago Bo ul evard and Walnut Avenue have requested annexation to the District . This property lies within the City of Orange and the densities of the pr oposed development wi ll b e consistent with the Distri ct 's Master Pl a n. Therefo r e , i t is recommended that the initiation of annexation p r oceedin gs be authorized . No . 66 -Staff Report on Discussions with City of Orange Pe r sonnel Regarding Sewer Service for a Proposed Restaurant in Co u nty Territory at the Intersection of Chapman Avenue and Crawford Ca n yon Road . At the April meeting of the Board , the staff was directed to hold discussions with representatives of the City of Orange regarding the request fo r sewer service for property l ocated in an unincorporated area immediately adjacent to a City of Orange sewer . We will be re - porting on the results of the discussions and possible alternative solutions . -6- Fred A. Harper Gen e ral Ma n ager JOINT CHAIRMAN REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN CALL MEETING AT 5:30 P,M, A () :;J 9 -1-"-LU '>l-1>!. OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR l -HE-Si3-A-Y) l1A¥-28-TH) INVITE DIRECTORS SVALSI 8D AND .,S..g~JU OR DIRECTORS == KAYWOOD AND BYRNE TO ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSIONS, ANNOUNCE THAT AN ORIENTATION PROGRAM IS BEING PLANNED FOR NEW DIRECTORS TO ASSIST THEM IN LEARNING ABOUT THE DISTRICTS AND HOW THEY FUNCTION, WE HAVE SELECTED 5:30 P.M,) THURSDAY) MAY 30) AS A TENTATIVE TIME AND DATE TO TOUR THE TREAT MENT PLANTS AND HOLD A SESSION ON THE MAKEUP OF THE BOARDS AS WELL AS A DI S- CUSSION OF THE LONG-RANGE PLANS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE DISTRICTS, 5/8/74 Joint Chairman Porter: Re: Agenda Item No. 3 The City of La Habra advised today by telephone of a change in Directorship as indicated below and advised that the Directors would be hand delivering the Minute Excerpt tonight. DISTRICT ACTIVE ALTERNATE 2 Beth Graham Robert Nevil* 3 Robert Nevil* Rehe!t Young (*Mayor) ( ( ( MONITORING PROGRAM COST FOR NPDES PERMIT Agenda Item No. d-o Monitoring Divisions Revised Proe;ram Present Pro~ram** .. District's Staff Laboratory Equip. Boat Laboratory Boat Recommendation Hours ~1000 Days Hours ~ Influent 413 1~770 1,770 Effluent 1,190 1,990 8 1,800 Beach 1,570 3,650 l 1,570 Nears ho re 1,040 1,040 104 520 104 Water Column 512 512 3 24 .40 l Sediments 6,012 10,120 10 12 4 Surf ace slick 200 200 1 4 Gill netting Line fishing 360 360 4 Trawling 1,844 1,844 1 4 350 4 Kelp photos 16 16 1 1* 32 2* TOTALS 13,215 21,502 25 153 3,316 110 Consultant fees for Trawls and Dives -------$22,000 TOTAL COST $176,ooo $242,000 $91,000 *Airplane cost figured as boat day **No additional equipment or facilities required , , BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 ol Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: II (1) (2) (3) ff\\::> ~llf ~v~··.•••.­ lETIER --·--··- A/C •..• TKLR •..• -·••O•UOoo.o -o o_..o...., .... _ (4) (5) (6) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE ADJOU RNME:NTS POSTC:O .. :;- COM P & MI LEAGE ... ~ ... . FILES SET UP ..... /. ..... . MAY ·g; 1974 ·-7 :·30 -p .-MI RESOLUTI ON S C E RT I FIED ~ LETTER S wri:nrn .... ~ .. MINU TES \VR iTT EN .... ~ MINUTES HLED ..... ~ .••• Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation Roll Call DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11 Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following cities regarding elections of mayors and appointments of alternates, and seating Re~\~~~bers of _E 3 he Boards ~~~ ~1,~~ OI)....; ~"-'---' ~~'-.. ~~~ CITY DIST. NO. -ACTIVE ALTERNATE Anaheim Huntington Beach 2 & 3 3 11 11 3 Miriam Kaywood W. J. Thom* Alvin M. Coen*~Harriett M. Wieder Alvin M. Coen~ Norma B. Gibbs Henry H. Duke Alvin M. Coen* Ph~llip H. Cox~ Charles L. Long Los Alamitos DISTRICT 1 Annual election of Chairman of the Board -<::::1~ DISTRICT 2 Annual election of Chairman of the Board -w ~ DISTRICT 3 Annual election of Chairman of the Board -'-:...\ '1- DISTRICT 5 -D.L'.~· & -t. ~ ! ".t'---u Annual election of Chairman of the Board DISTRICT 6 Annual election of Chairman of the Board -~ ~ DISTRICT 7 Annual election of Chairman of the Board -~n5JS-, tlu.;... DISTRICT 11 Annual election of Chairman of the Board -~ v-h~ ... Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 April 10, 1974 regular District 2 April 10, 1974 regular District 3 April District 5 April District 6 " April District 7 April District 11 April 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 1974 1974 1974 1974 1974 regular regular regular regular regular ' < . ' ~.\.) k, 0-C ·> '!-~-)\_..._.. )'o:;."l..t'" ~Q - § ~ b ' @ (16) N\\'J (17) v ~\<7 FILE ··············•·- lffiER S .. _:::.~ A/C ••.. TKLR - (18) FILE ···-··-··-····· LETTER ~ •.... :.. \ s A/C ._.TKLR •••• __ ....l_ '---····-·- (19) FILE ········-·-·· ~ ~ LETIER ·······-···- A/C .-.TKLR .... t,,.. '· ... .;. . .,._ .. ,.,. .............. . ____ ................ M# FILE --~-- ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Counsel ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written rep ort ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion accepting proposal of Lee C. White to assist the Districts and other consenting West Coast sewerage agencies in securing an environmentally sound and fiscally responsible Federal "secondary treatment" definition which is consistent with the State-adopted California Ocean Plan, on a cost-sharing basis with said consenting agencies for a maximum fee not to exceed $6,000 plus Districts' proportionate share of actual incidental expenses ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing execution of a Memorandum of Understanding with the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) of the California Institute of Technology in support of an Environmental Protection Agency construction grant for the JPL activated carbon wastewater treatment process . ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the followin g items in connection with utilization of digester sludge gas : (a) Consideration of motion authorizing and directing the staff to prepare plans and specifications for Replacement of Interplant Gas Line, Job No. I-4R, and authorizing advertising for bids ._____. ( b ) LETTER ···-··-··-· Consideration of motion authorizing and directing A/c--:::TKl: '""\ (\ v' ./ --·-··-~ ........ FILE ···-··-······- LETIER ............. . A/C ••.. TKLR •••• --- FILE ................. . LETIER ·······-···- A/C .... TKLR -· (c) (d) the staff to prepare plans and specifications for Installation of Gas Metering Equipment, Job No. I-4-3, and authorizing advertising for bids Consideration of motion authorizing and directing the staff to further investigate the feasibility of improving the quality of digester gas and report back to the Boards the cost effectiveness of removing moisture and carbon dioxide content from the digester gas Consideration of motion authorizing and directing the staff to negotiate with General Crude Oil Company, Southern California Edison Company and others, for the sale of any excess digester gas, to be conditioned upon availability of said excess gas, and incorporating an escalation clause to reflect increased demand and an adjustment in the rates to reflec t improvements in quality of the gas suppl i ed -2- ... ·~_8 LETIER ···-········· A/C •... TKLR ...• -----·-r21) '--,,-·- FILE ···············-N\ \ s, LETIER ·······-····· A/C .•.. TKLR .••• =----~-:-~·.:=-~ FILE ••..•...........•• LETIER ·······-····· A/C .... TKLR .•.• -······-··'-2.3) ~-·---~~>M\s FILE ···········-··-· ./ u:nER ---···-· A/C _TKl.R .••• ---·--,.·······-·-_ .. ____ .......... . (24) FILE ······-·········· I.ETIER •••.•• , s A/C .... TKLR ·- FILE ·····-····-·-( 2 5 ) LETIER ··-···-·-1 S, A/C ••.. TKLR ·-·N\ I ~-···· ... ··-·- (26) fV\ I> (27) ALL DISTRICTS Staff report on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit regulations proposed by EPA and the Regional Water Quality Control Board ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. No. 70-3, as amended, to change period for industrial accidents legislative actions. See page ALL DISTRICTS 74-70 amending Resolution the disability payment to comply with recent "A" Report of General Counsel regarding sanitary districts representation on the Boards of the County Sanitation Districts ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to make arrangements for an open house and plant inspection tour of the Districts' facilities, to be held Seiptember 25, 197 4 for elected officials and key staff members of the Districts' member agencies ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Influent Metering and Diversion Structure at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. I-8-3, authorizing an addition of $18,000.00 to the contract with E.T.!. & Kordick, A Joint Venture See page "B" ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file financial report of Director of Finance for nine-month period ending March 31, 1974; and authorizing budget transfers, as recommended by the Director of Finance ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress report on Treatment Plant Construction Projects. See page "C" ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file certification of the General Manager that he has checked a ll bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in o rder , and that he recommends authorization for payment (28) ALL DISTRICTS (28) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant books ROLLCALL VOT!.----for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing payment of claims listed on page "I" (29) ALL DISTRICTS FI LE ................. . Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any :e~--~~~~--~:: ((2;;))consideration of Resolution No. 74-76, authorizing filing -·---~application for Federal and State grants for publicly-owned ___ 1\1\\ c wastewater treatment works and providing certain assurances i.---IV\ ) See page "IV" E ••• --····· L~ER<)-·1 ··-~29b) Consideration of Resolut lon No. 74-77, endorsing the Clean AJC __ .TKLR •••• Water Bond Act of 197 4 (Proposition 2) See page "V" -----··-~ s. --~O)\ ~~S 1 & 7 ~ ~ra~~0-t·fon'a~ovin . uspens~ fun.._d-warrants, ~ if any. See supplemental agentla ·attachment -3- fl (31) DI£TRIGT 1 (32) (33) GefiB iaeratioR of mot ioR S:f:lf:'JFOViRg warrafit o 5 if al'ly,' Bee BUf'f)lemel'ltal ageRaa attaehHleRt DISTRIC ~~ ~ Oth/P /busines ~communications or supplemental agenda i ems, if any DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~·. '-/ 1 ( 3 11 ) DI~TRIGT § Go11sideration of metieR a13proving warraRto, if B:Ry. See oupplomontal agenda attaehmcHt (·35) DISTRIC .'P--~ ~)l er . bu~ii:_i~nd~n-:L.cations or supplemental agenda --~ .. terns, if any (36) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn g-. 1-J (37) DISr:l?HIGr:I? e Geasidoration ef JB0ti0R apprqving uarranto, if aAy. £00 oupplemental ageHaa attaehme~~ (38) DISTRICT 6 \, Oth ~!Vb~ce·mmur!.!cations or supplemental ~ms, if any (39) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn F. <(? agenda ..._ LETIER .:: ........ -( 4 Q ) A/C •... TKlR - DISTRICT 11 Consideration of Resolution No. 74-71-11, authorizing execution of a Quitclaim Deed to Southern California Edison Company for a portion of District's easement which is no longer needed due to the relocation of Newland Avenue .-------·!\\I~ ........_,, ...... ___ _ Force Main. See page "D" FllE ···-············· LETTER ___ ....... { 41) . DISTRICT 11 A/C .... TKLR .... --··--·-y \ ~ -···-·-··-....... , .. FILE .......... -.. ,..,·. LETTER ...... ~ •• ,A 2 ) AJC ·-ffiR "" -------!{\I ~ ___ , ....... _ Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to th e plans and specifications for Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension, Contract No. 11-12, authorizing an addition of $7.-'45.31 to the contract with Kordick & Son, Inc. See page "E" DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress report on construction of the Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension, Contract No. 11-12. See page "F" (43) DISTRICTS 3 & 11 \ (43) Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants. 1\-J\ 'S See page "II" (44) DISTRICT 11 .(44) Consideration of motion approving warrants. /\I\ \1S See page "III" (45) ISTRICT ~ 0t 1:.9',.......5usine s ~commun l-~.a~r-supplemental agenda :t-t-ems, if any (46) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn g : J.9 -4- (47) t'llE ............... ,u•• LETIER ······iflt5 A/~-3~7 ___ ._ .... (48) FILE ·--·i_-·f l) ~------- A/C __ .'00.R •••• (49) r\\S DISTRI CT 3 Consideration of Resolution No . 74-72-3, approving plans and spec ifications for Imperial Relief Intercepto~ ~' Reaches 22 & 23, Contract No. 3-19, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the bid date upon receipt of necessary permits from .the State Division of Hig hway s See page "'G" DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to receive and file Draft Environ- mental Impact Report for the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 through 8; directing the filing of Notic e of Completion in accordance with the Local Guidelines Implementing the Califor•nia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and establishing June 26, 1974, as the final date for which all comments must be received on said Environmental Impact Repor t DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress report on construction of the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-1 8. See page "H" (50) DISTRICT 3 N\ \s< so) Consideration of motion approving warrants. See page "II" (51 (52 ) 1'·-·-·-··-t5 3 ) LETTER ····-······~ ~c .... tKL~ ~~ \s ------- DISTRICT=3 ,.......----..._ _ Ot~--1>usines ~d __g,0mm unicat-i-o s or supplemental agenda :-t-e ms, if any DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn . ~.__s-D DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolution No. 74-73-2, approving plans and specifications for Carbon Canyon Intercept or Sewer, Contract No. 2-18, and authorizing advertising for bids on June 4, 1 974. See page "I" ~ DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 3, FILE ............... _. LETTER --··-- A/C _,.TKlR ·- FILE ..... ~ LETTER ............ .. A/C .... TKLR ... . to the plans and specifications for the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, authorizing an addition of $11,544.00 to the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting Company. Se e page "J" DISTRICT 2 Staff report on public hearing conducted by Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) on the Santa Ana River Interceptor, . Reach 3, from La Palma Avenue to the Orange County Line ,._ ----.( ... ,'fittj ) DISTRICT 2 FILE ................. . ::e~--~~~··:tif\ l S -~-- ~ ~/ FILE ................ .. \..EtreR .............. /\/\ / '-- A/C _:n«.R ••. ! ' I ../ ___ . ...,,.... Consideration of motion authorizing payment to Orange County Flood Control District in the amount of $844.48 for inspection services for the period November, 1973 through January, 1974, in connection with construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1 DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress report on the construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contra ct No. 2-14-1, and the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No. 2-14 ~2. Se e page "K" -5- (60) FI LE .......... J§l) LETTER -·····-····· A/C --.TKl.R •••• ----··l\ri\ s ----.ol .U \ FILE .................. < 62 ) LETTER ···---··-..,.,. '-- A/C __ ,TKLR :--M t '-J [ r &L V "l ·-- ® FI LE -·-·-·-··-~R .-.. -···-· ri\ \ S A/C .... TKLR .... -------·- Fii.£ ·······-····· .... ( 64) lETTER .•..•• ':::..-- ;;; •••. TKLR ••• \ S ____ _._.. DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving warrant s . See page "II" DISTRICT 2 usirle's and commtlr\ieat ons or supplemental agenda DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn o/:03 DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving the following Change Orders to the plans and specifications for Diversion Structures, Contract No. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-3E-l, and authorizing changes to the contract with Halopoff & Sons, Inc. as follows: Change Order No. 1 -Addition of $1,063.88 See page "L" Change Order No. 2 -Adjustment of Engineer's quantities and addition of $690.60 See page "M" Change Order No. 3 -Time extension of 16 calendar days See page "N" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 74-74-7, accepting Diversion Structures, Contract No. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-3E-l, as complete; authorizing execution of Notice of Completion upon receipt of letters of compliance from agencies issuing permits in connection with said contract; and approvin Q,,-,,...,,._<I? Final Closeout Agreement. See page "O" A..°'72-, DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file Draft Environ- mental Impact Report for the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reaches 10 through 18; directing the filing of N.o..ti.~e--.Q f Completion in accordance with the Local Guidelines Imp le- ~ -menting the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and establishing June 26, 1974, as the final dat e for which all comments must be received on said Environmental Impact Report DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 74-75-7 , authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 4.38 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Santiago Boulevard and Walnut Avenue (Proposed Annexation No. 4 0 - Tract No. 8266 to County Sanitation District No . 7) (65 ) DISTRICT 7 . FILE -····-········• LETTE R --·-··- A/C -m.lt \s Consideration of motion to receive and fil e letter from James A. and Dorothy G. Moulton requesting anne x ation o f approximately one acre of territory in the vicinity of Cowan Heights Drive between Briar Lane and Ran g eview Drive , and r e fer to staff for study and recommend a tion . See pag e "P" ~ (66) DISTRICT 7 LEn ER ············- A/C _ .. TKLR -·· (a) Staff report on discussion with City o f Orange re g arding request of Restaurant Adventures, Inc. for sewer service for a proposed restaurant at the intersection o f Chapman Avenue and Crawford Canyon Roa d (b) Consideration of action s -6- • (67) DISTRICT 7 l'ILE .•.... .,,.~ \ . 2"' c.... LETTER ············ ,;/ AfC _ •• TKLR ·-· Consideration of motion to receive and file claim of Southern California Gas Company, dated April 24, 1974, in the amount of $1,740.13~e alleged damages incurred by construction of the Coll ge Avenue Force Main, and -·-·-··-·-·-refer to General Counsel for recommendation -··-·-·-··-4-~ c:~ q 7 (68) DISTRICT 7 \ (68) Consideration of motion approving warrant s . ~'\ ~ See page "III" (69 ) ~l).!"CT~ ~er bUSirte.s s-~unications or supplemental agenda items, if any (70) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn t/~;J 5" ' -7- RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS May 8, 1974 -7:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 74-70 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 70-3, AS AMENDED (HULES AND HEGULArrIONS RELNI1IVE 'I10 CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATIVE TO CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT, RESOLUTION NO. 70-3, AS AMENDED * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Section 16 of Resolution No. 70-3, as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows: "Section 16. Whenever an employee is compelled by direction of his physician to be absent from duty on account of injury arising out of and in the course of his employment, he shall receive full compensation during the first three (3) calendar days of such absence. Thereafter, during such absence he may elect to apply pro-rated accrued sick leave to such absence and to receive compensation therefor in an amount equal to the difference between the compensation to which he is entitled under the Workmen's Compensation Act and his regular pay, not to exceed the amount of his earned sick leave. An employee may also elect to use any earned vacation time and equivalent time off for overtime in like manner after his sick leave is exhausted." Section 2. That any other resolution or motion or portions thereof that conflict herewith are hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and, Section 3. That this resolution become effective April 1, 1974. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 8, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #21 -A-ALL DISTRICTS cou;~JY S.:\:U T,\ TI o:\ DI STJ: I CTS OF OP.J\~:GE cou:~TY ·. P. O. Box 8127 -108-14 Ellis Avenue fountain Valley, California 92708 Cl IANGE ORDI:R C.O. NO. 6 ;o:~TRACTOR: E.T. I. & Ko rd ick, A Jo int Ven tu re ---------------------DATE May 2 , 197 4 Influent Metering and Diversion Structure roB: ________ _.:a~t_.R~e_c_1_a~m~a~t~1~·o~n-...P~l~a~n~t-N~T~o •• -=-l __ -~J~o-b--.N_o~·--=I~--8~--3=---------------------------- Amount of this Change .Order. (ADD) ttU~NW~Yi $ ____ 1 __ s .ii..' o __ o __ o ......... o..;..o_ In accordance with contract prov.isions, the following changes in the~ :ontract· and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as cor.tpensation :hcrefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are lereby approve~. . . -:·. Reference: Contractor correspondence dated. January 14 ·, 1974. Districts ·. ADD: correspondence dated.November S, 1973~ Contract Dra~ing No.· G-SA Rolling gate installed complete with track, guides, painting for lump sum price of Paving 4" AC on 8" AB 12,000 square-feet I NO TIME EXTENSION .· . .. . .. .... . ......... . Original Contract Price Pr~v. Auth. Changes 10,000.00 8,000.~ $ 1,290,000.00 $ 195,679.00 This Change (ADD) (~1() $ 18,000.0r .,_,,_ Hoard authorization date: May s, 1974 By---------------------·--~-------Cons ult 1ng bng1neer By ______________________ ,~~----:--- C on tractor AGENDA rrEM // 2 l! Amended Contract Price <: 1,503,679.00 "" :-B-. Approved: COUNTY SJ\NITATIOH DISTRICTS of Orange County, ·California By ----------------------c~h-1-e~-r--E_n_g_1_n_e_( ALL DISTHICTS PROGRESS REPORT TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 I-8-3 -INFLUENT METERING AND DIVERSION STRUCTURE -($1,503,679.00) INFLUENT CHANNEL: . Complete. INFLUENT PIPING: Euclid and Sunflower Trunk bypasses in service. Completed junction structures on Newhope-Placentia and District No. 1 trunk lines. Interplant Influent Interceptor, Ellis Force Main, Newhope-Placentia, and Sunflower Trunks have been connected to structure. METERING AND DIVERSION STRUCTURE: Underground structure complete. Installing equipment and completing meter installation. Installing electrical trays and wiring. Hanging lights. Power service to structure complete. Completed control building---finishing walls. Contract approximately 85 percent complete to date. J-13 -SHOPS AND WAREHOUSE FACILITIES -($1,061,989) SHOP A: Installing plumbing and electrical fixtures. Installing mechanical equipment. Painting. Bridge crane installed. SHOP B: Installing plumbing and electrical fixtures. Installing mechanical equipment. Painting. Erecting dust collection system. Wood block floor. complete. Bridge cranes installed. WAREHOUSE: Installing heating, plumbing and electrical fixtures. Painting. SITE: Paving, curbs, gut~ers and fence complete. Grading frontage. Contract approximately 93 percent .complete to date. P2-20 -POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT PLANT NO. 2 -($158,294) No further onsite work is expected until sufficient equipment has been delivered to complete peripheral lighting and control installations. . Unit substation delivery not expected before July. Contract approximately 58 percent complete to date. AGENDJ\ ITEM #26 C-1 ALL DISTRICTS Progress Report Treatment Plant Projects Page Two COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 108.C"' ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71'4) 5"0-2910 (71 "') 962-241 1 P2-21 -DIGESTERS "N" AND "0" AT PLANT NO. 2 -($1,076,514) DIGESTERS "N" AND "0": Installing piping and equipment on digesters. DIGESTER CONTROL BUILDING: Installing piping, electrical switchgear and sludge recirculation pumps and heat exchangers. TUNNELS: Installing piping. DIGESTER GAS CmtPRESSORS: Completing piping. Electrification to be installed on temporary basis until Job No. ~2-20 is complete. STOru.t WATER PUMP STATION: Structurally complete. _Having difficulty with . -·.'" pwnp deli very. PAVING: Paving underway. Contract approximately 86 percent complete to date. TREATMENT PLANT WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During April Total Work Bid in April Total Work Under Design DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During April Total Work Under Design $ 3,800,476 3,240,390 246,379 29,879,000 800,000 $21,975' 119 15,977,723 1,071,640 21,281,200 TOTAL Ai\10UNT UNDER CONTRACT & DESIGN May 2, 1974 AGENDA ITEM #26 C-2 $ 3,800,476 29,879,000 800,000 $21, 975J119 21,281,200 $77,735,795 ALL DISTRICTS RESOLUTION NO. 74-71-11 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF QUITCLAIM DEED A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF QUITCLAIM DEED TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY RE RELOCATION OF NEWLAND AVENUE FORCE MAIN * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Quitclaim Deed for a portion of existing District easement, dated May 8, 1974, from County Sanitation District No. 11 to Southern California Edison Company, be approved; and, Section 2. That the real property to be quitclaimed as provided for in that certain agreement dated December 9, 1971, by and between County Sanitation District No. 11 and Southern California Edison Company is more particularly described and shown on Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That the Chairman of the District be authorized and directed to execute said Quitclaim Deed, quitclaiming the District's interest in the certain real property hereinabove described. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 8, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #40 -D-· DISTRICT 11 cou:nY SA:HTATio:.; DISTl~ICTS OF OP..1\::GE cou::r.Y P. o. Box 8127 -lO<l·l·l Ellis ,\venue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE OlWf:.R C.O. NO. 1 CONTRACTOR: Kordick and Son, Inc. DATE --~M-a-y--2-,--1-9-7-4------- JOB: Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension, Contract No. 11-12 $ 745.31 Amount of this Change Order.{ADD) ~ ----- In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in th~ contract ~nd/or contract work are l1ercby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the cont~act price are hereby approved. ! .. . . . . Relocate conflicti~g ~til~ty at Station 43+34 NO TIME EXTENSION \. ' . .. .· Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD) (Dfil)!J~ Amended Contract Price $ 419,000.50 $ 0.00 $ 745.31 ""' $ 419,745.81 Hoard authorization date: May 8, 1974 Approved: COUNTY SJ\NITATIO!~ DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By------------~----~-----..----~-Cons ul ting Engineer By ____________________ __,~-.---~- Con tractor ;., f --------------------~c~1~1~1-e:?f __ c_n_g~1~n~c AGENDA ITEM #Lti -E-DISTRICT·ll M E M 0 R A N D U M May 2, 1974 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer SUBJECT: Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension Contract No. 11-12 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108-44' ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714') 540-2910 (714') 962-2'411 To date, all pipe has been placed. Presently, the junction structures at Nichols and Slater and Gothard and Slater Streets are under construction. Base course paving completed with the exception of a small area between the junction structures. Final paving, ·the completion of the junction structures and one manhole remain on the contract. All work estimated tq be completed by May l?th. REL:BEW:ss AGENDA ITEM #42 -F-DISTRICT 11 _____ ! ~ I W 1 ___ v_t _A _R N_E_R ___ I LJ ~ I LJ LJ I AVE N uE I l __ I l_ ~ ,. DD I . ._ DD 011 ~ ~~ ~ ODD_ u_ ~ ~ D ___ I - . 0:: 0 DI er.: <t :r: .._ 0 (!) :r.: u <! w CJ I ol z <l: ....I wl zl TALBERT m iJ ______ A_v_E N~ ,--i Ir= ( -N- J.15 MILES OF 42''PIPE CONTRACT AWARDED I· 9-74 COST #4J9,000 SC~EDULED FOR COMPLE.TlON lo-18·14 CONTRACT 11-12 SLATER AVENUE TRUNK SEWER EXTENSION ---COMPLETE teeeeeeTO BE CONSTRUCTED RESOLUTION NO. 74-72-3 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 3-19 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IMPERIAL RELIEF INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACHES 22 & 23, CONTRACT NO. 3-19 * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of Cou~ty Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering Corporation, District's engineers, for construction of the IMPERIAL RELIEF INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACHES 22 & 23, CONTRACT NO. 3-19, are hereby approved and adopted; ar.d, Section 2. That the General Manager be authorized to estaqlish the bid date upon receipt of necessary permits from the State Division of Highways; and, Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting ·held May 8, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #47 -G-DISTRICT 3 . M E M 0 R A N D U M May 2, 1974 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Mariager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer SUBJECT: Knott Interceptor, Contract No. 3-18 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108'44' ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714') 5'40-2910 (714') 962-2411 Work to date extends to 300 feet east of Hoover and Balsa Avenues. Contractor placing 500 feet of 96'' RCP a week. Base course paving completed to 800 feet west. of Beach Boulevard. All. curb, gutter and base course paving on Balsa Avenue east of Beac.h Boulevard completed. Contractor presently completing internal pipe work at Newland and Bolsa to facilitate the activation of our Balsa Avenue Relief Sewer early this month. REL :BEW: SS AGENDA ITEM #49 -H-DISTRIC'r 3 J ( ( ---, I ---· COM l~Lf1f • O e e e lo B~ CDNST~Oc.T~D ( ----...A~\/c. _____ I _I .-L ________ _, COUNiY OF ORAN6;- RESOLUTION NO. 74-73-2 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 2-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CARBON CANYON INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-18 * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Lowry & Associates, District's engineers, for construction of the CARBON CANYON INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO.· 2-18, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m., June 4, 1974, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 8, 1974. AGENDA rrrEM #53 -I-DISTRICT 2 cou;ny SA:HTATIO:~ lJISTi:ICTS OF Qp_,\::GE cou:;ry P. O. Box 3127 -10<l-l4 Ellis ,\venue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE OIU>ER C.O. NO. 13 CONTRACTOR: Sullv-Mi Iler Contracting Company ----------~------~-DATE May 2, 1974 JOB: Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Ave., Contract ~0 1 2-1~-l ~ount of this Change Or~er. (ADD) (~~n'Ul!l) $ 11,544.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in th~ c.ontract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as cor:ipensation therefor, the following additions to or dc<luciions from the cont~act price are hereby approved. . ..•.. . ' . As provided in Section 115 of the Specifications· and Addendum No. 3, the first additional "foot of rock is at a unit price of $7.50/C.Y. and the next foot at $9.00/C.Y. 962 Cubic Yards @ $7.50 = 481 Cubic Yards @ $9.00 = I . " $7,215.00 . 4,329.00 : Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes $ 6,274,608.40 $ 1,548,574.32 This Change (ADD)(~~~~ $ 11,544.eO --------~--~ Hoard authorization date: May 8, 1974 By----------------------~--r--------Co nsu l t 1 ng Engineer By----------------------,..--~~~~ Contractor AGENDA rrEM #54 Amended Contract Price $ 7,834,726.72 ... J- Approved: COUNTY SANITATIO!J DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By ______________________ C~h-1-e~-f__,E~n-g1n; MEMORANDUM May 2, 1974 TO: Fred A. Harper, General. Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 SUBJEct: Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contracts Nos. 2-14-1 & 2-14~2 2-14-1 Surface restoration completed. Remaining work involves plastic pipe .liner welding and testing. Estimated completion date is May 31, 1974. Pipe laying operations progressing very well. Completed work includes two sections of pipe: a section from Katella Avenue north for 2400 feet and a section from 1800 feet south to 1600 feet north of Glassell Avenue. Contractor has placed one-fourth of the total pipe footage. · Tunnel work at Glassel! Avenue continues as contractor removes and rejacks previously misplaced pipe. The Riverside Freeway tunnel crossing is presently underway and if run on a 24 hour schedule will be completed within 30 days. REL:BEW:ss AGENDA ITEM #57 -K-DISTRICT 2 / Lru ::-N 0 • 1 ··~·iiiliiiiil CoMPLf1f eeeee 1"0 e~ CON51RIJCTe=-D . . , cou;ay SA:UTAT Io:~ lJI STl: I CTS OF OP"'\::GE c.ou:;ry P. O. Box ·3121 -10a~4 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE OlWER C.O. NO. ·1 CO!~TRACTOR: Halopoff & Sons, Inc. DATE ---~-ta_y __ z-,--1-9-74----~- JOB: Diversion ·Facilities, Contract 7-3A-1, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-1, 7--3E-l . Amount of this Change Order. (ADD) (llXNN~I) $ 1,063.88 ...., In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the. contract and/or contract work are 11ereby authorized and as co~pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the cont~act price are hereby approved. ~·. ' .. Reference: .. Contractor's invoice dated April 26 ,-197~. ·ADD: ADD: For removal and disposal of abandoned concrete lined and coated water line between Station 38+75 and 39+25 on Newport Boulevard Correct original"contract amount to correspond with contractor's · .·extensions of unit prices TOTAL ADD: ,· *This figure will not be incl~ded under Chang~ . Order No. 1 on the Progress Payment. . .. .. . .... .. .. .. ~-- .· Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes $909.88 154.00*" $1,063.88 $ 25,978.40 $ 0 00 This Change (ADD) ~-cnt) $ 1, 063. 8~ Board a\!thorization date: May 8, 1974 By ________ ~--~~--~---~--~~~ Consulting Engineer By--------------------~~~-::--=~ Contractor AG ENDA rrEM # 61 Amended Contract Price s 27,042.28 :-L- Approved: COU~TY SANITATIO!J DISTRICTS of Orange County,· California By--------------------~rr----"!'"~---~ Clnel Eng inE; DISTRIC'l' 7 cou;ny SA:HT1\TIO:.~ DISTI:ICTS or OP"'\::GE cou::ry P. O. Box 3127 -108-14 Ellis ,\venue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CJIA~GE OllDER C.O. NO. 2 CONTRACTOR: Halopoff & Sons, Inc. DATE --.....M~a-y---2-,-1~9~7~4~----~ JOB: Diversion Facilities, Contract 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-.3E-1 Amount of this Change Order. (ADD) (DEUUOlX) $ 690. 60 .._,. In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as co~pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. . .. . . . ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES ADD: Item ·Change Est'd Quantities No. Unit From To Difference 1 L.F. 386 387 2 L.F. 258 260 3 L.F. . 82 ·s3 11· Each l s L.-UCT: . 9 L.F. 154 . . 128 10 Each 1 0 12 C.Y. 10 0 -.. ... .. .-~--.... ~ Hoard authorization date: May 8, 1974 By------------~~--"'T"'!"--~~~~~ Consulting Engineer By--------------------~~~-::-:-=-::-C on tractor AGENDA rrEM #61 1 @ 21. 00/L. F. . 21.00 2 @ 2.1. 30/L. F. 42.60 1 @ 2~.00/L.F. 23.00 4 @ 375. OO/Each . 1,500.00 ·• Total Add: . 1,586.60 26 @ 8.50/L.F. 221.00 ,. 1 @ 325.00/Each. 325.00 10 @ 35.00/C.Y. 350.00 Total Deduct: 896.00 TOTAL ADD: 690.60 Original Contract Price $ 25,978.40 Prev. Au th. Changes $ 1,063.88 This Change (ADD) (DIDU.~i) $ 690.60 Amended Contract Price $ 27,732.88 .-M- Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, ·california By----------------~--~r----:-~~ # Chie·t EngiTiC DISTRICT 2 cou;ny SA:UTATIO:~ DISTl~IC:TS OF O?.A::GE cou::TY P. o. Box 3127 -10a~4 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CJIA:iGE OlWER C. 0. :\O. 3 :ONTRACTOR: Halopoff & Sons, Inc. DATE --~Ma---y--2-,-1-9~7~4----------- JOB:Diversion Facilities, Contract 7-3A-1, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-3E-l ~ount of this Change Order. ~'O.~ ~ $ 0.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in th.e '-"' :ontract and/or contract work are 11ereby authorized and as cocpensation ~herefor, the following additions to or deductions from the cont~act price are iereby approved. • .. ... Extension of Contract Time The·contractor is hereby granted an .. ext.ension of time due to delay py the Orange County Road Department in issuing.an excavation permit. Work performed under Change Order No. 1 15 Calendar Days 1 Calendar Days TOTAL TIME EXTENSION 16 Calendar Days Summary of Contract Time Original Contract Date O~iginal Contract Time Original Completion Date Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date -~.-. ..... - :Board authorization date: .. .· .... Original Contract Price Prev. Au th. Changes February 28, 1974 45 Calendar Day~ April 14, 1974 16 Calendar Days 61 Calendar Days April 30, 1974 $ 25z978.40 $ 1,764.48 This Change ~X}jJJ~ XIlLDlJ~ $ 0.00 "-"' Amended Contract Price $ 27,732.88 Approved: May 8, 1974 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS cf Orange County, California By----------------------~-----.-----Cons ult ing Engineer By _____________________ __,~~~~~ Lon tractor By------------------~----,.,------~ Clue-£ Eng inc( AGENDA I'J1EM //61 • -N·- RESOLUTION NO. 74-74-7 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-38-1, 7-3E-l·AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-3E-l AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Halopoff & Sons, Inc., has completed construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for DIVERSION STRUCTURES, CONTRACT NO. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-3E-l, on the 30th of April, 1974; and, Section 2. That by letter, Boyle Engineering Corporation, District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has con- curred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the Diversion Structures, Contract No. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-3E-l, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 28th of February, 1974; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Halopoff & Sons, Inc. setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of said Diversion Structures, Contract No. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-3E-l, is hereby approved; and, Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 8, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #62 -0-DISTRICT 7 Board of Directors ~an1tat1on District No. 7 Orange County Santa Ana, California 1082 St. rtegis Place banta ruia, Cal11ornia 92705 April 10, 1974 ·it is hereby requested that the property described as Lot 33 of Tract No. 3021, in the county of Orange, State of California, as per map recorded in book 92, pages 5 through 9 inclusive o.f l·liscellc..neous l·~aps, in the office of the county recorder of Orange County be annexed to Orange County Sanitation District No. 7. A map of this property is enclosed •. I understand District 7 will complete the legal description. An existing boundary of the sanitation distric~ is adjacent to the southerly property line of' this lot. Refer to the Lilje blad-\'iessinger annexation, April 1969. The area of this lot was calculated from the dimensions recorded on the tract map as filed with the county and reproduced herein. Tne irregular shape of the lot was divided into three oblique triangles, 1, 2, and 3; plus a sector of a circle~ 4. All cal- culations use basic trigonometry, and are presented in the order performed. The results are as follows: Area 1 12,078 Square feet 2 14,857 1t " 3 13,032 " " 4 222 ti It Total -40,199 II JI :: 0.923 acres Owners of the sole p~cperty for which a!lnexation is requested: Ja.nes A. & Dorothv G. :i1·ioulton, joint ten;:.:...!lts 1032 ~t. Hegis Pl~ce .:>·1nt•3. ~ins., Gal1I'"'ornie.. 927J5 Talephone: 544-3685 ~ copy of the Joint Tenancy Grant Deed is enclosed. Assessed value or the property involved: ~4250 according to the current tax bill (July 1, 1973-June 30, 1974). Assessors parcel /1503-302-0 1+. No vot9rs now reside upon the ?roperty ~ro~osed for a!~1ex~tion. ~::..-iclos~d is ;..:. cl10c:·: i:i t~~ 9.n:>u.:1.t o:' -)325.JJ to cov9r ·:!istrict p~ocassi~~ cos~~. ). Dorothy G. Moulton ~nclosures: 1) ~-~~p 2) Ce:.lculation ol area ( 4 S!l~ete) :; ) vOP.., v--a -... J.Jeed 4) C.i:1ecl: 1or ·lf· 325. 00· AGENDA ITEM #65 -P-DISTRICT 7 ... Agenda H. G. OSBORNE CHIEF ENGINEER ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 400 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST BANTA ANA, CALIF"ORNIA .;2-//-/-/ MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: 834-2300 AREA CODE 714 April 29, 1974 Orange County Sanitation District No. 2 P. o. Box 127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 INVOICE P. 0. BOX 1078 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 F"ILE No. EOl. 30 Costs incurred by the flood control district for inspection per the terms of District Permit No._ 15171, dated March 21, 1972, for the months of November, 1973 through January, 1974. MAINTENANCE DIVISION: G. Evans 6 7 hrs. @ 7. ll $476.37 Overhead @ 60.9% 290.ll Equipment rental 78 hrs. @ 1.00 78.00 TOTAL COST $844.48 Please make your check payable to Orange County Flood Control District. Approved for payment Engineer II eo Anos OF o ::;t::crons County Sanitation Districts of Orange Cou nty, Californ ia JOINT BOARDS SUPPLEMEN TAL AGENDA ITE MS MAY 8, 197 4 -7:30 P.M. ALL DISTRICTS Post Office Box S 127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 9 2 708 T elephones: Area Code 7 1 4 540-2910 962-24 11 AGENDA (2 8) Consi deration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Op e r at i ng and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund wa rrant books for signature 9 f the Chairma n of District No . 1, a nd authorizing payment of cla ims l isted on page "I" (2 9a ) Consideration of Resolution No. 74-76 , authorizing filin g .; applicat i on for Fe deral and State grants for publicly -ow n e d wastewater treatment work s a nd providing c ertain assurances S ee page "IV" (29b) Co n side r ation of Resolution No . 74-77 , endorsing t he Clean Wa ter Bond Act o f 1974 (Propos·i t ion 2) See page "V" DISTRIC TS 3 & 11 (4 3 ) Consideration of motion approvirig suspense fund warrants . See .page "II " DISTRICT 11 (44) Consideration of motion approving warrant s . See page "I II"·· · DI STRICT 3 (5 0) Consideration of motion approvin g warrants . See page "II " DIST RICT 2 "(58) Consi de ration of motion approving warrants. See page II II II DISTRICT 7 (68) Con s ide r a tion o f motion a pprov i n g w a rran~s . See p age II I II " WARRANT NO. 2 280 5 2 2806 22 8 07 228 08 22809 22810 22811 22812 22813 22814 22815 22816 22817 22818 22819 22820 22821 22822 22823 22824 22825 22 8 26 22827 22 82 8 22829 2 2830 2283 1· 2283 2 22833 2 283L~ 22835 22 836 22 83 7 22838 22839 228 40 2 28 L~1 228 42 2 284 3 2 28 44 228 4.5 228 46 228 47 22848 2 2849 22850 22851 22852 22853 22854 22855 22856 228 57 22858 22859 2286 0 22861 22862 22863 22864 22865 22866 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Air Conditioning Supply Co., Freight All Bea ring S e r vi ce , Inc., Be arings & Pipe Supplies Americ a n Kl e aner Mf g . Co., Inc., Valve American Pneumatic Tool Co., Machine Equipment American So ciety for Testing & Materials, Technical Manuals City of Anaheim, Power Anaheim Truc k & Tra n s fer, Freight The Anchor Packing Co., Gaskets Apco Suppl y , Hardwa re Aquatic Ce nter, Sa f e t y Supplies Associated Concrete Products, Inc., Manhole Sections Azusa Western, Concre te Bank of Ame rica, Bo nd & Coupon Collection Banning Ba ttery Co., Batteri e s Beckman Instruments, Inc., Cable Bell Pipe & Supply Co., Pump & Valves Bend e r Mac hine, Inc ., Engine Re p air Blower-Pape r Co., Janito rial & Maintenance Supplies AMOU NT 33.50 872 . 39 11.82 l, 168 J'~ 35. 75 28.7 3 6.6 4 9.26 6 .15 10.00 57.24 293.25 138.45 261.83 80.14 44 3 .93 732.66 Bomar Magn eto Service, Inc., Engine Parts & Magneto Repair Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employm~nt Exams Broadlick Art Supply, Certificate Framing 197-58 389 .~.4 39.00 32.70 28.22 Bruning Divi s ion, Dr a f t ing Sup plie s C & R Re c on d itioning Co., En g ine Re pair & Pump Parts CWPCA, Ann u a l Co n fere n c e Expe n se Cal's Ca meras , Ph oto Suppli es Cal Sta t e Sea l Co., Fla n ge Gaske t s Califo rni a Co lla t o r Sa l es , ·Binding Supplies Le onard Ca rne y, CWPCA Confe r e n ce Expense 695.00 208 .00 37.08 78.1 3 56 .16 John Ca r o llo En g inee r s , En g inee ring Service s (MO 4-10 -74) Chica g o Pneuma tic Too l Co., Co mpres sor Pa r t s 79 .7 f) 5, 0 21. L~05 .05 32.86 271.60 34.98 1,269 .28 575. l L~ 22.36 255.68 Willia m N. Clarke, CWP CA Con fere n ce Expense College Lu mbe r Co ., Inc., Bu ild ing Ma te rial s & Hardware Con c r e t e Ti e, Building Ma terial s Co n so lidated El ec tric Distr., Electric Supplies F. B •. Coo k Co r p ., Bu lkhea d Remo va l Copel a nd Moto r s , Inc., Truck Pa rt s Costa Mesa Auto Parts , Inc., Tru c k Parts Co s ta Mesa Co un ty Water Di stri c t . Mr . Cra n e , Cran e Renta l Cres t Leasi ng, Leased Ve hicle -4 Month s Crow n Control s , Inc ., El e ctric Ca ble Curtin Mat h eson Sc i entific, Inc., La b Supplies Deaver Manufac turin g Co ., Truc k Repa ir J ohn M. Deck , Equipme n t Pa r ts Di amon d Core Drill i ng Co ., Con cre t e Saw ing Duc ommu n Me t a l s & Su pp l y Co ., Stee l Dunn-Edwa r ds Co r p ., Pa i nt Supp lies Eastman , I nc ., Office Su pplies En chanter , I n c ., Ocean ographic Se rvic es (MO 2 -13-7 4) Enginee r s Sa l es Se rvice Co., Inc ., Pump Part s En s i g n Products Co ., Fre i ght Enterprise Pri nt i n g , Pri nt i ng Supp lies & Print ing Fischer & Port er Co ., Meterin g Equipment & Training Clifford A. Forkert, Construction Survey PW -033 City of Fountain Vall ey , Water Wil liam H. Fox, Employee Mil eage & CWPCA Co n fe r ence Freeway Machin e & Welding Shop , Mac h ining Larry Fricke r Co ., Inc ., Weed Kil l e r Gar-Wood L .A. Truclc Equ i p ., Inc., Truck Equi p me n t Garde n Grove Lumber & Ceme n t, Bu i lding Ma te ria l Ga s k et Manufact uring Co ., Gaskets Genera l Elect r ic Suppl y Co ., El e ctri c Supp lies I-1 6.oo 407 .69 586 . 34 16 5.33 8 69 .52 10 5 .00 51.4.2 4 5 .00 175 .1 5 22 .00 6 20 .87 3 ,200 .00 1 38 .86 17.1 5 11 3 .88 1 ,1 25.92 826 .0 40 .CJD Expense 66 .85 1,033 .50 11 0 .25 83 .21 172 .99 68 .58 1,050 .72 WARRANT NO. 22867 22868 22869 22870 22871 ...,872 ~873 22874 22875 22876 22877 22878 22879 22880 22881 22882 22883 22884 22885 22886 22887 22888 22889 22890 22891 22892 22893 22894 22895 1"''°)896 -.t897 22898 22899 22900 22901 22902 22903 22904 22905 22906 22907 22908 22909 22910 22911 22912 22913 22914 22915 22916 22917 22918 22919 ~~920 '-"921 22922 22923 22921.~ 22925 22926 22927 22928 22929 IN FAVOR OF .AMOUNT General Telephone $ 2,738.65 Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine Contract 1-1-73 4,014.64 Golden West Fertilizer Co., Grit Removal 1,128.00 Graybar Electric Co., Electric Supplies & Hardware 157.07 Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Repair 23.69 Hach Chemical Co., Inc., Chemicals 123.94 Halsted & Hoggan, Inc., Pump Parts 158.47 Allan Hancock Foundation, Technical Manuals 41.74 Fred A. Harper, Various Mtg., COD & Conference Expenses 270.17 Harrisons & Crosfield, Inc., Chemical Coagulants 689.0J Heathkit Electronic Center, Communication Equipment 105.95 L. Heitman Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Rental 1,453.50 Hercules, Inc., Chemical Coagulants 315.88 Hertz Car Leasing Division, Leased Vehicles 572.96 Hewlett Packard Co., Equipment Repair 67.50 James E. Hoagland Co. & Hoagland Engineering Co., Equip. Rental & Piping 1,416.69 Honeywell, Inc., Telemetering Supplies 221.03 House of Trophies, Director's Plaque 25.21 Howard Supply Co., Pipe Supplies, Boiler Parts & Valves 3,833.36 Hundley Company, Inc., Electronic Equipment & Controls 369.57 City of Huntington Beach, Water 23.59 Huntington Beach Equipment Rentals, Equipment. Rental 574.63 Huntington Laboratories, Inc., Lab Supplies 32.25 Industrial Asphalt, Asphalt 10.29 Ingersol-Rand, Compressor Parts 281.53 Inland Nut & Bolt Co., Hardware 520.86 International Harvester Co., Truck Parts 33.55 Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies & Fittings 284.91 Kilsby Tubesupply Co., Steel 63.32 Kleen Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies 360e67 Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware & Tools 415.94 LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Equip. Parts & Hardware 1,510.46 L & N Uniform, Uniform Services -2 Months !~, 405.48 Lacal Company, Inc., Lubricant 24.68 Lance Engine Services, Inc., EquipmGnt Parts . 705.78 Kris Lindstrom, Employee Mileage & CWPCA Conference Expense 102.08 R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., Paving Materials 68.90 McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Hardware 6C> .91 Marine Biological Consultants, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring (MO 11-14-73) 4 .. 904.37 Missimers, Inc., Hardware 239. 22 Moore Products Co., Compressor Parts 44.17 Morrison Co., Check Valves 67 5. 36 National Chemsearch, Solvent & Cleaner 1,086.75 National Fire Protection Association, Manuals 3.93 National Lumber & Supply, Inc., Building Materials 99.19 Nates Saw & Lawnmower Shop, Saw Sharpening 14.70 City of Newport Beach, Water ~88.92 C. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel Retainer eo~.00 OFCCO Construction Co., Inc., Boiler Repair 248.21 Office Equipment Co., Equipment Repair 18.oo Orange County Stamp Co., Rubber Stamps . 21. ·76 Osterbauer Compressor Service, Compressor Parts 102.75 Pacific Telephone 462.41 Norman Parsons, Employee Mileage 15.75 M. C. Patten & Co., Inc., Control Repair & Steam Traps 309.63 Jose Pena, Weed Removal 308.0J Philadelphia Gear Corp., Pump Gear E-067 (MO 5·-2-73) 7 ~ 372 ~ 30 Postmaster 500cOC> Lee Potter Comp~ny, Inc., Maintenance Supplies 195.78 Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage 38.lC> Rapid Color, Inc., Printing 249.74 Red's Frame & Wheel, 'rruck Repair 25 .13 The Republic Supply Co. of Calif., Hardware 76.60 I-2 WAHRJ\N'r NO. 22930 22931 22932 2.2933 22934 22935 22936 22937. 22938 22939 22940 22941 22942 22943 22944 22945 22946 22947 22948 22949 22950 22951 22952 22953 22954 22955 22956 22957 . 22958 22959 22960 22961 22962 22963 22961+ 22965 22966 22967 22968 22969 22970 22971 22972 IN FAVOR OF Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Parts & Freight $ Royal Plumbin~ & Heating Co., Lateral Repair San Jose Hyatt House, CWPCA Conference Expense Santa Ana Blueprint Co., Printing Santa Ana Engraving Co., Printing Supplies Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Chemicals Scientific Products, Lab Supplies Scott Refrigeration Service, Inc., Air Cond. System Repair City of Seal Beach, Water Richard J. Shaffer, Warehouse & Purchasing Study Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies Signal Flash Co., Barricade Rental Fred Sinasek, Employee Mileage Singer Business Machines, Maintenance Agreement South Orange Supply, Piping Supplies Southern Calif. Edison Southern Calif. Gas Co. Southern Calif. Water Co. Sparkletts Drinking Water Co., Bottled Water Speed-E Auto Parts, Trudk Parts Standard Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline Sully Miller Contracting Co., Backfill Material Surveyors Service Co., Survey Supplies J. Wayne Sylvester, CASA Meeting Expense Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage & Supplies Reimbursement Taylor-Dunn, Equipment Parts . Technical Book Co., Technical Manual Techni-Tool, Inc., Tools John Thomas, CWPC.A Conference Expense Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Steel U. S. Equipment Co., Inc., Compressor Parts Union Oil Co. of Califo, Gasoline & Services United Auto Parts, Truck Parts United Reprographics, Inc., Printing Utility Body Co., Truck Parts Valve & Primer Corp., Valves John R. Waples R.S., Odor Consultant Warren & Bailey Co., Inc., Fittings Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc., Engine Parts West Print, Printing Wilson Engine & Equipment Co., Engine Parts Russell Wold, Employee Mileage Xe1~x Corp., Reproduction Services /\MOIDJT 1,116.22 48.00 252.11 89.37 7 .95 54 J" 54.~· 110.16 20.29 400.00 1,987.33 334.3~ 47.58 32.75 68.50 35,7J.i5.37 1,290.17 3.00 90.72 284.51 3,645.68 44.77 28.78 33.51 176.15 119.79 19.61 120.81 46.60 3,281.08 ~(6. r--.. 6.~ 369.85 50.35 84.57 186.56 218.20 73.56 47.26 58.60 232.72 123.48 1, 04 5 .1i9 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING $ 122,540.52 I-3 WARRANT NO. 22973 22974 22975 976 ~977 22978 22979 22980 22981 22982 22983 22984 22985 22986 22987 22988 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING F'ITTID WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Almquist Tool & Equipment Co., Tools $ Tommy Ayres Chevrolet, New Trucks (MO 2-13-74) AMOUNT 621.27 5, 704 .92 26,176.68 John Carollo Engrs., Engineering -Plant Construction Constructors Supply Co., Tools Decorating Trends Int 1 1., Window Blinds E.T.I. & Kordick, Contractor I-8-3 E.T.I. & Kordick, Retention Release Contractor P2-ll-l Hemisphere Constructors, Contractor P2-21 Joe Kay Design & Construction Co., Retention Release Contractor PW-034 LBWS, Inc., Welding Machine Motorola, Inc., Communication Equipment J. Ray Construction Co., Contractor J-13 SSP Truck Equipment, Inc., Truck Bodies Twining Laboratories, Compaction Tests J-13 United Reprographics, Inc., Plans & Specs Pl-16 Ziebarth & Ziebarth & Alper, Retention Release J-4-1 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF I-4 337.33 200.56 54,900.00 63,302.40 53,420.65 685.20 813.38 1,460.55 138,058.57 1,802.00 200.00 3,137.60 37,413.35 $ 388,234.46 $ 510,774.98 DIS'rRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 22989 22990 City of Anaheim, Facility Relocation 2-14-2 $ AMOUNT 1,731.89 871.82 161.25 1,758.or 470,202.3'-" 22991 22992 22993 22994 22995 22996 22997 22998 22999 23000 23001 23002 23003 23004 Clean Water Corisulta.nts, Engineering Service Ana.helm Forebay Project Phase II County of Orange, Compaction Testing 2-14-1 and 2-14-2 Epimenia Diaz and Miguel Gomez, Easement 2-14-1 Kasler Corporation & L.H. Woods & Sons, Contractor 2-14-2 Lowry and Associates, Engineering Service 2-14-3 & 2-15, Construction Survey 2-14-1 & 2-14-2 . Orange County Flood Control District, Inspection 2-14-1 Safeco Title Insurance, Easement 2-14-1 Sully.Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 2-14-1 Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Inspection 2-14-2 DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF C. Arthur Nissan, Legal Services Amercoat Suit ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering Service 3-19, 3-20-1, 3-20-2, 3-20-3, Construction Survey 3-18, Design Survey 3-20-1, 3-20-2 Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Inspection 3-18 A.G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N.M. Saliba, Contractor 3-18 DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF J. F. Shea. Company, Inc., Contractor 3-17 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-17 II $ $ 14,619.75 844.48 15.00 74,7.58.53 1,785.00 566,748.02 300.00 45,647.~ 2,080.00 428,068.80 475,796.30 476,096.30 318,972.64 69.71 $ 319,042.35 nr:~TfUCT NO. 7 FACILITIES ImVOLVING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOH OF 23005 23006 23007 23008 23009 23010 23011 Boyle EngineerinB, Preliminary Engineering 7-6-5 Halopoff and Sons, Inc., Contractor 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 'l-3B-l, 7-3E-l DISTRICT NO. 11 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF County of Orange, Compaction Testing 11-12 Huntington Capital Corporation, Refund Annexation Fees Kordick and Son, Inc., Contractor 11-12 Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Inspection 11-12 Twining Laboratories, Compaction Testing 11-12 III $ $ Af.l()lJlf J' lQ0.59 2,'l72. 00 73,650.81 312.00 8L~4. 50 RESOLUTION NO. 74-76 AUTHORIZING FILING APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS FOR PUBLICLY-OWNED WASTEWATER TREATMENT WORKS AND PROVIDING CERTAIN ASSURANCES A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING FILING APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS FOR PUBLICLY-OWNED WASTEWATER TREATMENT WORKS AND PROVIDING CERTAIN ASSURANCES * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to sign and file, for and on behalf of Cou~ty Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, an Application for Federal Assistance under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) and any agreements or other documents necessary to secure and receive a grant under said act and a state grant under the Clean Water Bond Law of 1970, as amended (Chapter 13, Division 7 of Water Code) for construction of wastewater treatment works; and, Section 2. That County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, hereby agree and further do authorize the aforementioned representative to certify that if grants for their project are made pursuant to the aforementioned federal and state statutes, they will (1) pay the remaining cost of the approved project; (2) provide proper and efficient operation and maintenance of the approved project after completion of construction thereof; (3) comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) and regulations issued pursuant thereto, and hereby state that the Title VI assurance of compliance forms attached to the Application for '-" Federal Assistance pertain to this project; and (4) comply with require- ments of Executive Order 11246 pertaining to equal employment opportunity in federally-assisted construction contracts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 8, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #29a -IV-ALL DISTRICTS . . . ' . RESOLUTION NO. 74-77 ENDORSING THE CLEAN WATER BOND ACT OF 1974 (PROPOSITION 2) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ENDORSING THE CLEAN WATER BOND ACT OF 1974 (PROPOSITION 2) * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the State Water Resources Control Board and the Federal Environmental Protection Agency, pursuant to legislation, have recently enacted regulations for wastewater quality control, which said regulations require construction of expanded treatment and disposal facilities and which construction may be beyond the ability of local communities to fund without State and Federal financial assistance; and, WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, have heretofore submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board a project report for improved treatment setting forth a detailed plan for conformance with the State and Federal regulations, which said plan projects a capital expenditure of approximately $275 million during the next ten years; and, WHEREAS, the Clean Water Bond Act of 1974, Proposition 2, has been placed on the ballot for the June 4th Primary Election to provide funds to be combined with Federal construction grant financing and local participation for construction of facilities to meet State and Federal requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, do hereby endorse the Clean Water Bond Act of 1974, Proposition 2, which will make available $250 million in State construction grant funds to local communities to assist in the financing of capital facilities necessary to complete .State and Federal mandated wastewater quality programs. PASSED AND ADOTPED at a regular meeting held May 8, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #29b -V-ALL DISTRICTS Joint Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California Hay 1, 1974 AGENDA ITEM NO. !2_ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 Subject: Summary Financial Report for Nine-Months Ended March 31, 1974 Transmitted herewith is the regular quarterly sunvr~ry financial report for the nine months ended March 31, 1974, pursuant to the Boards' policy directive of June 14, 1972. The statements su~marize the fiscal activities of the joint operations and the individual Districts fer the first .three quarters of the 1973-74 fiscal year and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The corrbined 1973-74 budgets for all Districts is approximately $72 million, of which 83% is for capital expenditures for facilities improvements and additions. The average percents of budgeted revenue and expense categories of the several Districts are as follows: Budgeted Revenue Tax Revenue Federal & State Construction Grants Connection Fees Other Revenues Carry-over from Accumld ated Construction Reserves Average Percent of Total Budget 22%. 8 5 10 Budgeted Expenditures District Facilities Expansion and Reserves Joint Works Expansion and Reserves Debt Service Share of Joint Operations District Operations, Maintenance, and Other Average Percent of Tota 1 Budqe t 53% 30 5 4 8 100% Included in each District's statement is a summary of the above major income and expense categories and an itemization of their trunk sewer construction projects and respective share of the joint works expansion. Separate staff reports on individual construction projects are included each month with the agenda material for the Joint Board meeting. Expenditures of all 34 funds of the several Districts will be maintained well within their respective 1973-74 budget allocations. Hcwever, because of developments which could not be anticipated when budgets were approved, it appears as if expenses in certain categories within a few funds will exceed their budget appropriation and, therefore, the following budget transfers, which are more fully described later in this report, are recommended: JOINT OPERATING FUND From the Account To the Account Prior Year's Expense Employees• Benefits Gasoline, Oil, and Fue 1 Rents and Leases Ut 111 t I es Other Expenses Amount $29,500 $ 2,000 3,000 3,000 20,000 1, 500 lli~229.. District No. 7 11 DISTRICT OPERATING FUNDS From the Account To the Account Amount. Unappropriated Connection Reserve Administration $ 6 1 000 Unappropriated Reserve i!.ii_OOO ---- Line Htce. and Re pal rs $ 7,000 Pump Station Mtce. and Repairs 71000 $14,coo Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. The statements are presented on an accrual basis and, therefore, inter-district transactions for fiscal •73-711 which were accrued in 1972-73 are not reflected in the year-to-date balances. If you have any questions concerning the material, I will be pleased to discuss them with you at your convenience. CASH AND INVESTMENTS Earned interest of approximately $2,328,000 from our continuing program of investing reserve funds (primarily capital funds accumulated for construction of required sewerage facilities) has accrued during the first nine months of fiscal 1973-74. This is double the interest earnings for the sarre period last year, primarily because of increased construction funds accumulated and a substantial increase In Interest rate·s over the past year; and represents an equivalent reduction on the average District's tax rate of approximately 08¢. As of December 31st, 98.5% of the Districts' cash funds were invested in short-term government securities or time deposits as shown below. The balance of cash on hand was earning interest in conmingled investments with the County Treasurer's Off ice. ~ Percent Cash on Hand $ 625,921 1.5% Investments in Gov't Securities 40,167,104 98.5% Total (Al 1 Districts) $40,793£025 .!QQ.L JOINT OPERATING FUND This fund accounts for operation, maintenanc~, and administrative activities relative to the Districts' jointly- owned treatment and disposal facilities. Salaries and Wages -Because of unfilled positions, payroll expenditures for salaries and wages wil 1 be maintained well below the anticipated budget level and will enable absorption of salary adjustments for all employees authorized effective December 1, 1973. Employees' Benefits -Expenditures for authorized .employee benefits will be maintained within the budget allocation with the exception of Workmen's Compensation Insurance. Because of recent legislative changes which became effective April 1, 1974, State Compensation Insurance premium rates have increased 6%. It is therefore necessary to request a transfer of budget funds from the Prior Year's Expense Account to the State Compensation Insurance Account in the amount of $2,000. Gasoline, Oil, and Fuel -As the Directors are aware, significant fuel cost increases are being realized. The Districts' unit cost of fuel has jumped 51%, and it is therefore necessary to request a transfer of budget funds from the Prior Year's Expense Account to the Gasoline, Oil, and Fuel Account in the amount of $3,000 for the remainder of this year. The Districts' cooperative purchasing arrang~­ ment for gasoline and diesel fuel with the County of Orange has been superseded by Federal petroleum allocation and price regulations. Under the regulations, sanitation services receive priority alloca- tions. The recently-completed contract to increase our gasoline storage capacity now allows us to receive full tank-truck deliveries. Insurance -Amount reflects the net expense after chargebacks to individual Districts for their respective share of the insurance overhead related to job costing. Chlorine and Odor Control Chemicals -Primarily for odor control at treatment plant sites. Chemical Coagulants -The staff has been able to temporarily change the mode of operation which has precluded the necessity of expending funds and yet enable the Districts to meet the current enforced discharge regulations. Professional Services -Selection of a vendor and implementation of recommendations contained in EDP study adopted by the Boards is presently under way. Purchasing and warehousing study is anticipated to be completed during the fourth quarter of the fiscal period. Rents and Leases -Equipment -Because of unexpected major equipment repairs, the rental of large cranes necessary for removing and replacing the equipment has exceeded the budget allocation for the year, and a transfer of budget funds is recommended in the amount of $3,000 from the Prior Year's Expense al location to the Rents and Leases Account. Research and Monitoring -Annual share of participation in Southern California Coastal Water Research Project has been paid, and expense to date includes estimated allocations for the first three quarters of 1973-74. -2- Utilities -The major item in the Utilities Expense Account Is for purchased electrical power. The Districts have experienced a 54% increase in electrical costs over the same period for the last fiscal year. Approximately 12% of this is a result of rising demand as flows increase and new facilities are placed into service. The balance is a result of utility rate increases. It is therefore necessary to request a budget transfer in the amount of $20,000 from the Prior Year's Expense Account to the Ut i 1 it i es Account. Other Expenses -Because of considerable increases experienced in our freight-in expenses, it is necessary to request a budget transfer of this account from the Prior Year's Expense Account in the amount of $1,500. Prior Year's Expense -This account represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account account balance from the previous year. It is anticipated to be maintained well below the budget allocation and, therefore, the above budget transfers are reconvnended. to be made from this account. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND This fund accounts for the costs of expanding and improving the Districts' presently-°"'ned treatment and disposal facilities and represents an average of 30% of each individual District's budget requirements for 1973-74. During the first nine months, $3.4 million was expended on joint works treatment and disposal facilities expansion. The Districts have completed several major construction contracts and several minor projects .• On April 17th, a low bict of $29.6 million was received for the 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 1. The bid is presently under review by State and Federal agencies and will be considered by the Joint Boards at their regular June meeting. The share of joint works expansion costs are refle~ted in the financial statements of the respective Districts. INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS -The statements reflect the accounting transactions for the seven Districts and include each respective District 1 s share of the Joint Operating Fund and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. Taxes -Approximately 52% of the 1973-74 secured tax levy of $15.3 million has been allocated through March, 1974. Federal and State Construction Grants -Summarized below is the amount of Federal and State Construction Grant funds received during the period. Presently, State and Federal agencies will fund 87-1/2% of 11 approved11 treatment plant projects. 1970-71 Joint Work~ Projects -$1,875,800 representing 20% of grant 1972-73 Joint Works Projects -$2, 156,500 representing 45% of grant Connection Fees -Districts Nos. 5 and 7 have had connection charges for several years. Connection fees became effective in Districts Nos. 2 and 3 on October 1, 1973. Collections through December are reflected under this account in the respective Districts• financial statements.· Sixteen of the nineteen cities in Districts 2 and 3 have remitted fees collected during the first three quarters. Our Industrial and Permit Division is contacting the staffs of the remaining cities regarding the status of connection fees_collected within their respective cities. Other Revenue -Except as footnoted, consists primarily of interest income, various fees, and sale of capacity rights. District Construction -Represents expenditures on Districts' Master Plan construction program of trunk sewers. The average 1973-74 budget for this item is 53% for the seven Districts. However, this average is influenced by the major programs of Districts 2 and 3. Itemization of each project is included on the lower portion of each financial statement. The total expenditures for the seven Districts during the first three quarters is $8,846,000. Share of Joint Works Construction -Represents Districts 1 share of joint treatment and disposal facilities expansion. Discussed above under Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. Bond Retirement and Interest Expense -Payment of principal and interest on outstanding general obliga- tion bonds of the respective Districts. Annual expense for al 1 Districts is approximately $2.3 million. Share of Joint Operating -Represents Districts' share of operating and maintaining jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities, and administrative activities. Costs are distributed based upon each District's respective gallonage flow (see Joint ·Operating Fund statement for details). District Operating and Other Expenditures -Consists primarily of individual Districts' general operating expenses and operation, maintenance, and repair of the respective Districts' collection systems. We have experienced an unanticipated 15% increase in the number of connection permits -3- Issued in District No. 7, and it is therefore necessary to request a budget transfer of $6,000 from the Unappropriated Reserve Account to the Connection Administration Account. Because of necessary additional maintenance and repairs to the Slater Avenue trunk lines and pump station, a budget transfer is recommended in District No. 11 from the Unappropriated Reserve Account to the Line Maintenance and Repair Account, and the Pump Station Maintenance and Repair Account in the amount of $7,000, respectively. J. Wayne Sylvester Director of Finance -4- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SUMMA.RY JOINT OPERATING BUDGET REVIEW Nine Months Ended 3-31-74 REMAINnm BUDGET 1973-74 YEAR TO DA'J.'E BUDG:ST SALARIES, fvAGES & BENEFITS Salaries & Wages Employee Benefits Sub-total Pavroll Less:· Chargebacks to Dists & CORF Net Joint Operating Payroll MATERIALS, SUPPLIES & SERVICES Gasoline~l & Fuel Insurance Office Expense Operating Exp2nse Chlorine & Odor Control Chemicals Chemical Coagulants Other Operating Supplies Contractual Services ~rofessional Services Printing & Publications Rents & Leases--Equipment Repairs & Maintenance n~search & iilo_.nitoring ~·avel, Heeting & Training u·cilities Other Expenses Prior Years Expense~ Total Material & Supplies TO'J.1 .A.L JOINT OPEHATING EXPENSE Less: Revenues NET JOINT OPER/~TING EXPENSE 2,217,201 ·364,330 2,581,531 790,000 1,791, '531 25,000 27,000 16 ,_ooo 75,000 118,ooo 74,800 38,000 46,ooo 28,000 12,000 177,000 194,ooo 12,5'.)0 342,500 4, 750 40,000 1,220,550 3,012,081 200,0JO 2,812,.081 FLO\'! IN MILLION GALS GALLONAGE CHARGES 1 2 3 c:: ~ 6 7 11 4,996 12,854 13,476 2,380 2,537 2,851 3.032 MG 42.126 MG 1,513,002 704,199 239.912 a24.418. 1,752,914 28,617 679,068 110.932 1,073.846 717,685 19,959 5,041 25, 030. 1,970 9, 585 6,415 39,160 35,84:) 118' 00·'.) 40,688 34,,112 10,951 27,049 33,334 12,666 13,159 4,8.41 12,283 (283) 120,870 56,130 70,537 123,463 10,280 2,220 254,639 87,861 4,942 . (192) 6z837 . 33z 16~ 672,254 548,296 1,746~10'.) 1, 265, 981- 174,634 25, ~66 1,571,466 1~240.z615 GALLONAGE CHARGE 186,374 479,517 502,707 88,767 94,653 106,331 1J3.JJ7 l. ~ZJ., !H56 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1974 BUDGET REVIEW Remaining 1973-74 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes . Federal and State Construction Grants Connection Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditure~ Ending Fund Balances, March 31st 1,119,617 569,300 199,763 500,000 3,119,053 97,038 334,422 171,418 FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION Ill PROGRESS: Sunflower Interceptor Litigation Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROPERT1', PD.4.VT & EQUIPMEHT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative ...,acilities ~quity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-73 . 433,889 21,657 4,238,544 11, 593 16,078 5,'065,632 9,787,393 2,737,771 669,220 298,699 206,928 3,912,618 26 331,508 89,819 186,374 25,638 .· 633, 365 3,279,253 1973-74 Additions 26 331,508 450,397 270,601 .(7,165) 499,·974 2,787,545 7,219 148,048 145,780 Balance 3-31-71+ 26 765,397 21,657 J~, 238, 544 11, 593 16,078 5,065,632._ 331,534 lO,Jl8,92~- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1974 BUDGET REVIEW Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Connection Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditure~ Ending Fund Balances, March 31st 1973-74 Budget 4,871,762 1,787,700 975,000 5,666,283 17,697,250 5,783,726 5@9,507 862,817 . 1, 210' 295 FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUC'I'ION IN PROGRESS: Santa Ana River Interceptor Reach 1 Santa Ana River Interceptor Reach 2 Other Projects -Design Stage · Share of Joint Works Expansion CQ/.fPLETED PROPERTY. PLANT & EQUIPl·fENT: Land and Property RiBhts Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities DiGposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative ,aclli ties Yquity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-73 3,734,203 127,858 41,155 3,903,216 1,361,854 212,246 12, 243·, 082 ·1, 186 33,i72 28,616 J.S,899 1 584 33.682,956 Remaining Year to Date Budget 12,911,530 2,883,275 937,532 u20., 401 22 04:i912 19,457,650 5,029,843 1,041,412 536,334 479,517 73240~ .· 7,160,515 12 :i 29:Z: :i 135 1973-74 Additions 4,629,348 246,846 153,649 5,029,843 1,041,412 1,988,487 850,168 654,599 3' 261, :371. 12, 6"67,'4-07 4,742,314 53,173 383,300 1,136,886 Balance 3-31-:Z:4 8,363,551 374,704 194,804 . 8;933,059 2,403,266 212,246 12,243,082 l_, 186 33,172 28,616 1 c:s ' 8 qq t -~ 8 4 6 '071, 255 . 39 ~ 7~)1 .. ~11 COUNTY SArlITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FirJANCIAL REPORT March 31, 19'""(4 BUDGET REVIEW Remaining 1973-74 Budget Year to· Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Fed.eral and State Construction Gr.ants Connection Fees O:ther Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reser~es Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, March 31st 6,245,041 1,941,'700 1,800,000 1,603,387 i5,028,ooo 5,436,422 827,184 899,051 792,658 FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: .Share of Knott Interceptor Rchs·. 1 & 2 Knott Interceptor Reach 3 Knqtt Interceptor Reach 4 Balsa Relief Trunk . . Seal Beacn Blvd. Pump Station Pump Other Projects -Design Stage Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROPERTY, PL1NT & EQUIPf·~~NT: Land and ~roperty Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative 1l'acilities ~quity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-73 . 2;472,474 1,184,994 139,211 161;274 6,880 3,964,833 1,479,085 236,105 17,750,732 15,036 .28,4i9 27,092 ·17' 268, 248 40,760,sso 12,917,828 3,690,363 1,018,236 290,555 969,873 18,886,855 3,328,883 1,131,195 746,640 502,707 123,188 5,832,613 13,054,242 1973-74 Additions 60,548 2,159,035 883,619 14,287 119,254 92,140 3,328,883 1,131,195. 4,460,078 2,554,678 923, 464 . ,1, 509 ;445 . 633, 514 li,699,117 4,305,227 80,544 .396,344 669,470 Balance 3-31-74 2,533,022· 3,344,029 1,022,830 175,561 126~134 92,140 7,293,716 2,610,280 236,105 17,750,732 15,036 28,419 27,002 17, 268, 2I~8 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1974 BUDGET REVIEW Remaining 1973-74 Budget Year to Date B.udget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Connection Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditure~ Ending Fund Balances, March 31st 82~,327 36 , 200 250,000 91,814 541,897 1,384,021 30,040 148,122 587, 537 FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Share of Coast Highway Force Main Bayside Dr. Trunk Sewer Relocation Other Projects Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROPERTYJ PI1ANT & EQUIPME!JT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative ,acilities Y'quity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Pl'operty Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-73 698,878 5,528 676 705; 082. 280,276 6,231 2,178~148 7,347 7,1:15 8,946 312721210 _Q_._4651 355 1,225,770 494,244 192,949 52,600 90,400 2.055,963 82,418 214,654 27,384 88,767 1151110.· 528,733 l.~27,230 1973-74 Additions 68,386 14,000 32 82,418 214,654 331,083 175,251 197,400 .l,414~ 459,'479 1,169,367 2,656 59,355 472,027 Balance 3-13-74 767,264 19,528 708 787,500 494,93~ 6,231 2,178,148 7,347 7,115 8,946 3.272,,210 - . ..._.,. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1974 BUDGET REVIEW Remaining 1973-74 Budget Year to· Date Budp:et Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Connection Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Op~rating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, March 31st 519,396 348,700 122,801 251,000 1,553,082 37,079 169,852 . 236, 125 FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: ·Share of Coast Highway Force Main Other Projects Share of Joint Works ExpanRion COlefPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative r.;iacilities .._,quity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-73 94,392 2~983 97,375 265,005 562 524,213 '2,653 7,394 . 23,74~ _.3_,093,91 4.2014.!861 1,422,681 310,233 182,435 118,408 2.,033,,757 14,885 203,751 33,839 94,653 26,347 373,475 1.660,282 1973-74 Addttions 7,747 7,138 14,885 203,751 2181636 209, 163. 166,265 4,393 236;115 1,349,331 3,240 . 75,199 209,778 Balance 3-31-74 102,139 10,121 112,260 468,756 562 524,213 2,653 7,394 23,743 3, 093,916 . _lL_233' 497 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1974 BUDGET REVIEW Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Gr.ants Connection Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, March 31st 1973-74 Budget 1,826,211 462,600 230,000 281,020 1,962,114 2,180,693 598,035 193,625 624,246 FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: West Relief Trunk . Sunflower Interceptor Litigation Oth~r Projects Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROPl!.1RTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative "7acilities ~quity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total ·Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-73 521,239 2;056 523,295 351,693 217,751 15,403,613 · 10 ,782 8,082 4,l0:>,994 20,621,210 Remaining Year to· Date Budget 3,091,874 1,054,380 242,113 254,971 309,266 4,952,604 36,177 270,142 399,712 106,331 271,140 i,083,502 3,869,102 1973-74 Additions 18, 308 61 17,808 36,177 270' 14.2 771,831 220' 487" (24~97ll (28,246 . ' 1,925,937 1,910,551 198,323 87,294 353,106 Balance 3-31-74 539' 547. 61 . 19,864 559,472 621,835 217,751 15,403,613 lU, 7 C1t:!. 8,082 4,105,994. 306' 319 20 2 927 2 L~'.?C) COUNTY SA~lITATION DISTRICT NO. i1 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1974 BUDGET REVIEW Remaining 1973-74 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Connection Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances. EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, March 31st ·' ~. l,091,4:J.-3 421,800 317 ,.112 1,245,000 2,447,000 100,255 204, 192. 167,350 ·FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:· Shar~ of Knott Interceptor Rchs 1 &.2 Slater Avenue Trunk Other Projects Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative 'facilities ~quity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-73 392·, 502 314 392,816· 319,802 16,936 2,885,831 3,053 17,116 ~,733,675 7,369,229 2,963,503 625, 579. 220,159 219,165 .4,028' 406 354,186 247,305 89,863 113,118 99,385 3,124.549 1973-74 Additions 9,612 340,905 3,669 354,186 247,305 601,491 465,834 201,641 97,947 890,814 2,199,695 10,392 '91,074 67,965 Balance 3-:51-74 402,114 341,219 3,969 747,002 567,107 16,936 2,885,831 3,053 17,116 3,733,675 7,970,720 MEETING DATE __ M_a y_S_,_19_7_4 __ DISTRICT 1 TIME 7:30 p .m. DISTRICTS 1 ,2 ,3 ,5,6 ,7 & 11 (G AR THt:) .•.• ·.P ATTE RSON':'.. ./ __ -- (CLA RK ) ••••••• BATT l N •••..• ---lL ---- RI MA .••.•.•. ~ ---- (LA NGLEY) ••••• SA LT ARELLI •• -L ---- DISTRICT 2 (I\' IL) ••••• GR AHA M •••••• -4,.L. __ _ IE NG) ••••••• CH APUT •.••• • -1L. ---- ) •••••• CLA RK . • • • • • • ~ --- CAL LA HAN ) ••• -t:VONS ••••• _.J.::::::::: --__ · PATTER SON ) .•• GAR THE...... V --__ FOX) ••••••••• MAC KAIN ••• • ~ --__ . _ PE RRY· ••••• • l/" --- ISTANT ON ) ••••• SCOTT ••••••• ---'=:::::::.--__ THO M) •••••. KA YWO OD • • -1::::::.... ___ _ PEREZ) ••••••• TE Ml?.L E. • ••• • ~ ___ _ · DUNN~)...... I N_N._.' •••• •• ~ ____ . ROOT) •••••••• WOOD •••••••• ~ ___ _ DISTRICT 3 (MAC KAI N) ••• FOX.;······· ~ --__ (NUIJEl S ) ••••• ARB ISO •••••• ~ ___ _ 1 CLARK ••••••• BATTI N.· ••• ·~ ___ _ SALES ••••••• BL ACK MAN •••• --1...::::::: COLLI NS) ••••• BY RN E. • • • • • • ~== == (MEYERJ. •••••• DAVIS ••••••• o-___ _ EDWAR DS ••••• ~ ___ _ (PATTE RSON ) ••• GAR THE. • ••• • 1~ ____ ·_ (WIE DER) •••••• COEN ••••••• -k:::.. ___ _ {LO NG ••••••• COX •• ; • • • • • cµ ___ _ (L '"AY O) •••• .-.soNJ U· ••••.• 0-> ---- ( CULVER······ i..---___ _ ,YOUN G) ••.•• NEVI L • · • •. ,_.- (TH OM ) •••••• KAYWOOD .••• -;::::::::----- (SCOTT ) ••••••• S VAL ST AD.... t..,.../ ---- (ROOT) ........ WOO D ........ ~ ---- ~ ---- DISTRICT 5 ~CROUL~ ••••••• MC INNIS •••• 1/ --__ BAKER ••••••• CLARK ••••••• --4-=-___ _ ·······------ DISTRICT 6 PORTER •••••• ~ ___ _ (CLAR K) ••••••• BATTI N •••••• ~ ___ _ ( Mc I N N I s ) • • • • swr e "E. . . . . . . _f::::::::"__ ---- DIST RICT 7 (L ANGLEY) ••••• ALTARE LL C :. ~----- (P RY OR)....... I . ~ :-:-: ••• ~ ---- ( ) •••••• CLARK ••• •• .• .....LL. ---- (GARTHE) •••••• PATTEP.S ON •.• ~ ---- POR TER •••••• ~ ---- (M C I NN I S ) •••• ROGERS .·····~ ---- (p · :z) · · · · ·JACKMAN • • ~---- DI STR l CT 11 (coEN) .•••••• DUKE .••••••• ~ ---- (CLARK) ••••••• BAKER •..• • •. ~ ---- (GIBBS) L . · .~~ · • · · · · ·~ ---- DI STRICT 8 (J OHN SON) MIT CHELL ••• ·------ CL ARK ·······------ HO LM •••••••• ------- JOINT BO ARDS CALLA H.t\N ) .••• t.YONS .•••• __rL_ __ NUIJE lS J ••••• ARB ISO •••••• ~ __ CLA RK ••••••• BAK E R .•••••• _.!:::::::... __ . CLAR K •••••.• BA TTI N •••••• _::::::=.._ __ SALE S ••••••• BLAC KM AN •••• ~ PRYOR) ••••••• BURTO N •••••• -;:::::--- (COLL I NS) ••••• BY RN E ••••••• !/""' -- (EWING) ••••••• CHAPUT •••••• --:=:----- 1 ) ...... CLARK . • • • • • • ,__..--- MEYER) ••••••• DAV IS ••••••• ~=== COEN) •••••• DUKE •••••••• ~ EDWARD S .. • • • 1.....------ (MAC KAIN) •••• FOX ••••••••• ~ -- (PATTER SO N) ••• GARTHE •••••• -V--- {w I EDER OR COE N ••••••• -V -- . GI BBS) e)~\?s ••••••• --:::::::---- (LONG ) ••••••• CO X •••••••• a.--. - (PEREZ) ••••••• JACKMAN ••• ··~==· ....... l LAC~Yo) ••••• ·.so NJU······· 0--=== FOX) ••••••••• MAC KA I N. • • • ,,.,...- CROUL) ••••••• MC I NN IS •••• ---V--- YO UNG ) ••••• NEVIL ••••••• ---1:::::::::.. -- GARTHE) •••••• PATTER S ON ••• _i.::::::__ -- . PERRY ••••••• ~ -- . PORTER •••••• t...----- RI MA • • • • • • • • --0:::---- (MC INNIS) •••• RO GER S •••••• ---:;---- (LANGLEY) ••••• SA LTARELLI •• ---V--- (S T AN TON ) ••.•• SCO TT....... v -- (TH OM . .J ..... KA YWOOD • • ~ -- 1 .N EY IL J ••.. GRAHAM • • • • • v-" -- MC INNI S J. .... s:(-9-RE ••••••• --=--- S COTTl ••••••• SVA LSTAD •••• -V -- ~PE R EZ •••.••• TE MPL E ••.••• ---:-=:::--- DUNN E •••••••• WI NN •••••••• --:;:::;--- ROOT) •••••••• WOO D •••••••• i........-==== CULV ER······ ,__ __ OTHERS HA RPE R SYLVE STER . LEWIS DU NN CL ARKE TA YLOR BROWN NI SSON EWIN G HOH EN ER HOWARD HU NT KE IT H KENNEY LYNCH MADDOX MAR TI NSON P I ERSALL S TEVENS MEETING DATE Ma y 8 , 1974 TIME 7:30 p.m . DISTRICT~ 1,2,3,5,6 ,7 & 11 DISTRICT 1 ~ 2=__/ 11 ---JOINT BOARDS . --·- (G AR TH{:) •••••• P ATTE RSON ••• -""----- (CLARK) ••••••• BATTIN •••••• -"' ----- RI MA ........ ~ ---- (LANGLEY) ••••• SA LTARELLI •• ....L_ ---- DISTRICT 2 (N IL) ••••• GRAHAM •••••• -"-___ _ E1vfNG) ••••••• CHAPUT •••••• _..;_ ---- ) .•••••• CLARK ••••••• _f_ ---- CALLAH AN ) ••• l=¥8itS-.•..• _,;_ ---- PATTERSON) ••• GARTHE •••••• _L ___ _ ·Fox) •...•.••• MAC KAIN •••• _v_ --- PERRY ••••••• _/ __ ·-- ! STANTON) ••••• SCOTT .••••.• _./ ____ _ JHO M) •••••. KAYWOOD .• J PEREZ) ••••••• TE MP LE. • • • • • / == == DUNN~) ••••••• WI NN. • • • • • • • / ROOT) •••••.•• WOOD ••••••.• ~ ___ _ DISTRICT 3 (MAC KAIN) •••• FO X.········ __::!_;_ ___ _ ( NUI JElS) ••••• ARB I SO •••••• _-t ____ _ ltLARK ••••••.• BATTIN •••••. _I ___ _ SALES ••••••• BLACKMAN •• • • COLLINS) ••••• BYRNE ••••••• v == == MEYER) ••••••• DAVIS ••••••• ~ ___ _ EDWARDS..... / (PATTERSO N) ••• GARTHE •••••• / == == (WIE DER) •••••• COEN • • • • • • • / (LONG ••••••• COX •••••••• --.-== == (L "''AYO)···· ···SONJU · · · • · • • ~ ----CULVER ······_,, ___ . __ _ (YO UNG) ..... NEVIL . .. .. . ~ (TH OM ) •••••• KAYWOOD ••• -;----- (s COTT) ••••••• SVA LSTAD •••• -./----- (ROOT) •••••••• WOOD ........ / == == DISTRICT 5 (CROUL) ••••••• MC INNIS •••• _v _____ , (BAKER) ••••••• CLARK ••••••• _/ ____ _ ·······------ DISTRICT 6 / PORTER •••••• _____ _ (cLARK) •.••••• BATT I N •••••• _.1 ____ _ (MC I NN I S) •••• ST ORE ••••••• _____ _ DIST RICT 7 (LA NG LE Y) ••••• SA LTARE LLI .• _I _ ---- (P RYOR) ••••••• BU RffiN .••••• _v _ ---- ( ) •••••• CLARK •.•.• •• ------ lGARTHE) ••••.• PATTERSO N •• ,_1 _ ---- / PO RTER ••••• ·------ (MC INNI S ) .••• ROGERS .··.··------ (p · '~Z) · · · · ·JACKMAN • • _/_ ---- DI STR 1 CT 11 CcoEN). . •.••• DUKE ••..•••• -./----- (CL ARK) ••••.•• BAK ER .••• ···--· ---- (GI BBS ) • • • • · • Ca;ZJ · · · · · · ·-,/----- DISTRICT 8 (JOHN SON ) MITCHE LL ••• ·------ CLARK ·······------ HOLM ........ -------· !CALL AHAN ) •••• U 'eN& ..... _.; __ _ NUIJEIS) ••••• ARB IS O •••••• _v __ _ CLARK ••••••• BAKER .•••••• ____:::._ __ CLAR K ....... BATTI N...... / .(SALES ••••••• BLACKMAN.... ./ == (PRYOR ....... ~M T 61 J...... v (COLLINS) ••••• BYRNE ••••••• ~ -- (EWING) ••••••• CHAPUT...... v ~ ) •••••• CLARK ••••••• -./---. - MEYER) ••••••• DAVIS ••••••• --C--- COEN) •••••• DUKE •••••••• --:7 -- EDWARDS ••••• -Y -- ~MAC KAI N) •••• FOX ••••••••• -/--- PATTERSON) ••• GARTHE •••••• v == W-iE DER aQR COEN ••••••• ./ . GIBBS)~ --~ .......... -vr--- (LONG ) ••••••• COX ••••.••• ~ -- (PEREZ) ••••••• JAC KMAN ••••• -;;---....... FOX) ••••••••• MA C KAIN •••• / ILAC8YO) ••••• ·SONJU··· • ·•• '~ ~ CROUL) •.••••• MC INNIS •••• --V -- YO UNG ) ••••• NEVIL ••••••• -./--- GARTHE) •••••• PATTE RSON ••• ~ -- PERRY ••••••• ~ -- . PORTER •••••• ~ -- RIMA •••••••• ~ -- (MC INNIS) •••• ROG ERS •••••• _L -- (LA NG LEY) ••••• SALTARE LLI • • / -- (S TAN TON) •••• ,SCOTT ••••••• ~ -- (THOM . ) KAYWOOD -/--- (NEVIL . J .•.•• GRAHAM • ·-./--- (Mc I NNIS~::: :sTORE •. ::::: c,._ -- (scOTT) ••••••• S'IALSTAD ••.• -v--- lPEREZ ) ••••••• TEMPLE •••••• ~ -- DUNN{:).. •••••• WINN •••••••• --;--- ROOT) •••••••• WOOD •••••••• v ~ CUL VER ····· ._L_ __ OTHERS HA RPER SYLVESTER . LEW I S DU NN CLA RKE TAYLOR BROWN NISSO N EWIN G HOHENER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY LY NCH MADDOX MARTINSON P I ER S AL L STEVEN S May 8, 1974 MEETING DATE -------TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS :'',' ~~~o..::n \ D To._ Qr:' ti ':-:'.; ./ ) Al )~~1 •••.•••• -,.'\T,E.,...,C,"r.-T. ------CALLAHAN •••• LYOf~S ••••• 4l.:_ __ CLARK) ••••••• BATTIN •••••• ..t__ ---NUI JE!S) ••.••• ARB I SO •••••• __L_ __ RIMA ••.••••• ..&__ ----CLARK ••••••• BAKER ••••••• _,,, __ _ (LANGLEY) ••••• SALTARELLI •• _.,,_ ----CLARK ••••••• BATTIN •••••• _v __ _ DISTRICT 2 SALES ••••••• BLACKMAN •••• _y_ PRYOR ••••••• BURT0t~...... v ( ~· IL) ••••• GRAHAM •••••• _L __ __ ~COLLI ~S) • • • • • BYRNE ••••••• --4-== ! EWfNG) ••••••• CHAPUT •••••• _v_ __ __ ~EWING ) •••••• CHAPUT •••••• ~ __ ) •••••• CLARK ••••••• ~ ----E ) •••••• CLAVRK ••••••• _L -· - CALLA A. N) 1 uo, .. .a 1/ M YER • • • • • ••DA IS• • • • • • • /)... H • • ·~vc43 • • ••• ~ ----OEN) K ---PATTERSON) •• • GARTHE. • • • • • _L_ ---C •••••• ~gW~RD...... ~ -- FOX) ••••••••• MAC KAIN •••• _v-_ ----~AC KAIN) FOX S ••••• - -PERRY ••• {r."'::. ___:::::_ __ __ . ·. ) • • • • •••••••• _.:!._ - ! STANTON) ••••• SCOTT ••••••• _L_ __ __ A--T-TERSDN • •• GARTHE •••••• ___:!.__ __ JHOM) •••••. KAYWOOD .• _L ____ . ·/ WIEDER ~R COEN ••••••• -"'·-__ PEREZ~-· ••••• TEMPLE •••••• _./ _____ ·· ... ~. GIBf~-·y· X .•••••• ·-- DUNN} WI NN ./ ·-·-:-l:;QNG·-••••••• CO •••••••• _6'-· _ • • • • • • • • ••••••• -2..;.. ----· JACK AN ROOT •••••••• WOOD •••••••• _v-_· ----PEREZ • • • • • • • M ••••• _<i_" -- DISTRICT 3 (MAC KAIN) •••• FOX.· • • • • • • • ___:!.__ ____ · (NUIJE~S) ••••• ARB I SQ...... .., !CLARK ••••••• BATTIN •••••• •· == __ SALES ••••••• BLACKMAN. • • • '. COLLI NS) ••••• BYRNE. • • • • • • . ·~· == == MEYER) ••••••• DAVIS ••••••• ~ ___ _ EDWARDS. • • • • ./ (PATTERSON) ••• GARTHE •••••• ,/ == == (WIEDER) •••••• COEN • • •• • • • " (LONG ••••••• COX •••••••• -.. '.----- (L • ~AYO)··· • • ·• SONJ U ••• !' •. • • i == == ~ CULVER· .;It;~.~ ___ _ (YOUNG) ••••• NEVIL . • • • • • / ~THOM . ) •••••• KAYWOOD ••• -./----- SCOTT) ••••••• S VALS TAD.... / == == ROOT) •••••••• WOOD •••••••• _./ ____ _ DISTRICT 5 (CROUL) ••••••• MC INNIS •••• _.,,_ ---- (BAKER) ••••••• CLARK ••••••• -"-___ _ ·······------ DISTRICT 6 . PORTER •.•••• _.t ____ _ (CLARK) ••••.•• BAiTIN •••••• _v _____ _ (Mc INN Is) •••• s+ORE ••••.•• -"''-' ---- DISTRICT 7 (LANGLEY) iJ .,,. •• SALTARELLI •• + ----~PRYOR) • .x,f>P. •• BURTOrt: .•.•. • ••• ------~ ..... ·~~~~~·.:,~~·:1.1.----S-----~.I •••••• ,-A1 ,r.;f'-Su.~.W; __ ---- PORTEr~ •••••• _../_ ---- (MC INNIS) •••• ROGERS •••. ··-'*'-. ---- (p i:z) ·····JACKMAN • ._L_ ----.._,. DISTRICT 11 ~COEN).-•• -•••• DUKE.· •••••• ____:!:._ ---- CLARI<) ••••••• BAKER •••• ··-~ ---- GIBBS) • • • • • 'OE~i • • · • • · .~ ---- DISTRICT 8 (JOHNSON) MITCHELL ••• ·------ CLARK ••• ····------ HOLM •••••••• ------- FOXJ ••••••••• MAC KAIN •••• ~ !LAC~ YO) •. • • • • ·SO NJ U • • • • • • • t:.~.... == CROUL) ••••••• MC INNIS •••• -.. _.--- YOUNG ) ••••• NEVIL ••••••• -~,--- GARTHE) •••••• PATTERSON ••• -,,--- PERRY ••••••• -"--- . PORTER •••••• -lf-.. -- RI MA • • • • • • • • ---Z::: -- (MC INNIS) •••• ROGERS •••••• ---;--- (LANGLEY) ••••• SALTARELLI •• v, == (STANTON) ••••• SCOTT ••••••• " ( THOM . ) ••••• KAYWOOD •• -v.-... -- NEV IL J j .... GRAHAM ••••• -,.---- MC I N N I S , ••••• STORE ••••••• ~ -- SCOTT~ •••••• ·.sVALSTAD •••• -, .. --.- PEREZ ••••••• TEMPLE •••••• -~---- DUNNt: •••••••• WINN •••••••• -.t-. -- ROOT) •••••••• WOOD •••••••• -,--- OTHERS --l . ~-------- /f,.-JI CULVER·····. 7 -- HARPER SYLVESTER . . LEWIS DUNN CLARKE TAYLOR BROWN NISSON EWING HOHENER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL S}EV~NS v .1 --....... .' I 1. . ~/ -~ . . I ,_ . JIJ,d~b:,.l v 5/8/74 JOINT MEETING (4) Jerr y Patterson nominated . No further nominations . Nominations closed. Patterson elected Chairman of District No . 1 (5) Donald Winn nominated . No further nomi nations. Nom i nations closed . Winn elected Chairman of District No. 2 (6) Donald Fox nominated . No further nominations . Nominations closed . Fox elected Chairman of District No. 3 (7) Mcinnis requested that annual election for District 5 be held off until June . It was so moved , seconded and carried . (8) Ellis Porter nominated. No further nominations . Nominations closed. El l is Porter elected Chairman of District No . 6 (9) Donald Saltarelli nominated. No further nominat ions. Nominations closed. Saltarelli elected Chairman of District No . 7 (10) Henry Duke nominated. No further nominations. Nom inations closed . Duke elected Chairman of District No . 11 (13) Report of the Joint Chairman Called a meeting of the Executive Committee for May 28th and invited Directors Svalstad and Sonju to attend . Mcinnis advised t h at District 5 would not be able to attend as their council meeting is that night . Duke questioned whether Tuesday night was a bad n i ght since there wasn 't a quorum last month. Porter suggested that possibly Wednesday night would be better. Voted by hand and three voted for Wednesday . Changed meeting date to the 29th of May . Porter then announced that there would be an orientation program for new Directors _at 5:30 p.m . on May 30th . Would tour the treatment plants and discuss long-range plans and objectives. N~MX~XK~~~~ (14) Report of the General Manager Mr . Harper referred to report included in Directors' folders prepared by SCCWRP. This is a continuing program that has been going on for about 4 y,ears and our Districts are financial participants. Have a representative on the Commission. Feel the work be ing conducted is very significant. Study marine environment . Program extends from Mexican border to Santa Barbara County l ine . Funding this at the rate of about $1/2 million per year with all agencies together . Previous l y submitted a report for first three years ' work with significant findings. Are cont i nuing to l ook into reported problems concerning discharge i nto marine waters . Information and evaluation will be very significant over the years . ( FAH referred to Supplemental Agenda item No . 29b. Reso lution endorsing the Clean Water Bond Act of 1974 (Pr oposition 2). Said the resolution < dec l ared that the Boards of Directors of OCSD are in favor of passage of the bi l l . With the Directors' permiss i on after adoption of this reso l ution, woul d release their names and cities or agencies represented as in favor of this bond issue which will help the local communities ) to finance the construction programs necessary to meet the objectives ~ of the Federal Act . Clark asked where the money was coming from and FAH answered that the State would have to sell bonds . Regarding JPL activated carbon process that has been under development here , reported that we had representatives from Washington, D.C., EPA and NASA , SWRCB, Region IX of EPA in San Francisco, and many other dignitaries here. Mr. Harper briefly outlined process . Said after the briefing in the morning, the technical peop l e from EPA and State met with JPL and our staff technicians and discussed how this p rogram could be expanded. What we are suggest i ng to EPA and State is that we convert the primary clarif iers at Plant 2 so we can u se a phy sical - chemical process which we have developed for one of our clarifiers wh i ch will remove a greater amount of solids. We are also suggesting that $3~ million be allowed for further development of this process on a larger scale. Pilot plant handles 10,000 gallons a day and JPL feels it needs to be scaled-up to at least 1,000,000 a day or more . The approach of JPL is to spend another year developing pilot plant techniques and then possibly a twp -year expanded program. EPA representative felt that with what he saw at the pilot plant, it would be better if they would just move into an expanded program rather than spend one year on the pilot program . One advantage is that we utilize sludge as part of the purification process and end up with just an ash and the ash reduces it down to 10% of what the solids would be otherwise . State has asked that we submit an amendment to the Project Report that we qsubmitted several months ago requesting that we be permitted toa g·o to design of modification of sedimentation basins at Plant 2 and request Step II grant for further development of JPL process. (i5) Report of the General Counsel Mr. Nissan reported on letter received from Counsel for the Garden Grove Sanitary District, Ron Tiday, who requested that we consider interpreting the Act regarding Directors of sanitary districts in such a manner that the Garden Grove Sanitary District and other sanitary districts could have an alternate to their member. Said he couldn't quarrel with the idea but statute just doesn't allow an \ •Jr alternate delegate for a sanitary district. Wrote Mr. Tiday that if -/ ·' they felt tk~t strongly about it, perhaps Directors would support .!~p1 legislation to get Act amended so sanitary districts could have alternates ~ .t\ to their delegates. Niss on said he was in Sacramento in 1955 and \.}~ recalled there was a discussion concerning this at that time and the ~ prevailing thought was that they did not want to have alternate members for the sanitary districts and that was why they were specifically left out . LA County was the dominate force for that amendment and they don't have any sanitary districts in that county . With regard to discussion several months ago re Conflicts of Interest legislation and the resolution passed by certain Districts that unless State legislators were required to report as well as councilmen and supervisors, they felt it was bad legislation, Senator Whetmore said State legislators are subject to Act if it ever gets past Supreme ~Court . Also reported that Federal Fair Labor Standards Act amendment was effective May 1st and will affect Districts . Will be paying time and one -haif for overtime and will not be allowed compensatory time off in lieu of money . Will be getting some information probably by next meeting. Just how far or how many employees this affects, can't answer yet. Finally finished the District 3 suit vs . Amercoat. Lost it, as anticipated. Started in 1958. Second trial. Peter Kiewit suit laid to rest finally . For the first time in 10 years, are going to trial for District 2 right of way. Set for June 3rd . 12 separate owners to deal with. Settled all but 2 or 3 . Reported that several weeks ago received a call from a lady from the Association of University Women regarding Proposition 2 and said he gave her information which he hoped would be adopted tonight. Question was then asked concerning property in District 2 suit and where it was located . Nissan answered it is along the west bank of the Santa Ana River immediately s·outh of Warmer Avenue. Our offer is $6,300 and their demand is $16,300. -2- Nevil questi o ned Nisson's statement that t he P e ter Kiewi t suit was finally put to bed . Asked what the disposi tion of tha t suit was. Nisson answered that it was terminated for a ll time. $1 00 ,000 -- $40,000 from Districts and $60,000 from Eng i n eers or insurance company . Nevi l then asked Nisson to expla i n what the original suit was for the t benefit of the new Directors. Said suit was for extra work cau sed -~l .... -lr .... \i·' by improper specifications for construction of t he l arge o ut fall and I ) y"· ,, their demand was $650, 000. Sai d he thought it was a good se ttle ment ~ 1' ·vJ.;' on behalf of the Districts . Spe n t close to $75, 000 in defense costs 0 >. (Y etc . (20)~NPDES Permit Mr. Harper stated that as a result of the 1 972 Amendments to Fede r al Act, EPA has been required to issue to all dischargers t hroughout the U.S. a permit which is known as a NPDES permit. These permitsmust be issued by the end of thi6' year . In California the EPA has made arrangements with the SWRCB to issue these permits since they are the regulatory agency closest to the dischargers. I n our par t icul ar case we built our outfall out five mi les and becau se the federal government does recognize the three -mile limit, they are in the ac t as we l l as the State .agency. Only two situations like this .--Ou n agency and Ci ty of LA . Nisson added that Alex Bowie had sai d that he was going to have another one . Mr . Harper advised that we just receive p rop o sed conditions for permit a day or two before last mon t h 's Board meet ing and were not able to report on ramifications of regul ations. Hearing date was May 3rd and requested that hearing be continued to J une 7th which is the next meet ing of th e Regional Water Qual i ty Control Board . The Districts ' staff is meeting with repres entatives of EPA and Re gional Board, State Fish a nd Game and County Health Departments attempting to come to some agreement on why they are putting certain requi rements on us at this time .a nd what the ramifications are . Int roduced Kri s Lindst rom, Environmental Specialist , to report on situation to d ate . Kris reported that this permit, being the f i rst o f it s k ind, is taking into account the recently adopted EPA regulations and California Oc ean Plan regulations and encompasses quite a broad range of removal of certain pollutants which r e quire certa i n de grees of t reat me nt. Rat her complex. 4 3 page permit . Have had f o ur in -hous e staff meetings t o revie w ramifications. Met with E PA twice . Has significant imp ac t on taxpayers of Orange County through l imitat i ons spec i f i ed in this permit. I ndust r ial pre -tre a tment require d and plac es the b u rden on Dis tric ts to bring a l l industrial trunk sewer s into compliance . Eff l uent l i mita- tions . re bio -chem ic a l o xygen d e mand as well as heav y metals and other metals . Reporting req uire me nts are q u i te ext ensi ve and even go back to t he Districts having industries report any inplant changes and wit h some 5000 industries, ramifi cations overwhelm ~o ur present capaci t y . Much concern over monitor~ng and reporting sys tem specified which would in vo l ve considerable cost and far e xt e nds our present p r ogram and get s into realm of ocean r esearch which Districts are supporting through SCCWRP . Aren't even ways to me asure some of these pollu tants yet . Hav e pr epared comments on technical points to show to Re g i ona l Board for the ir staff to take into consideration . Ha v e had quite a good report f r om var i o u s agencies in reso lving some of the conflicts that h ave come u p wi th r egard to mo n i toring such as who i s to do what, who pays fo r i t and where the money comes from. Distri cts are h aving to absorb costs and co sts are e~orbitant. Other age n c ies wou ld have similar re quirements and have expressed co n cern over monitoring require ments not b e i ng standardized . Much of this i nformation spec ified would n ot really be meaning f ul . If further treatment required ,would not show any corre lation to some o f the bacteria limitations . Presently , we are meeting all of the chlorina- tion stan da rd s along 14 mil es of b eac h . Some of the limi tations imposed seem rather arbitrary and may require continuous chlorination and may cost 1/2 more per year ., EPA requires chlorinatio n and State requires no chlorine . Presently me ets standards and have had no reported b asic health problems. Ag e n cies h ave not come forth with any rationale . -3- Duke questioned comments regarding rationale and asked if we had taken a positive approach and made suggestions of what standard s should be. We are always asking EPA and federal agencies to prove it to u s . Maybe we should start tak i ngapositive approach and give them our recommenda- tions for al l Districts and all agencies . Maybe they are looking for someone to do this . Kris advised that this is what we have been doing with the technical information we have been providing them . Have been pointing out to them that if we meet their requirements , 20% of samp l es would be in violation . We are trying to come up with meaningful program and trying to find out the effects and what can be done . Porter added that staff has taken a positive attitute in providing them with th is basic research and cost figures. The staff is on top of this. Saltarelli added that he wanted to compliment the staff on the way they have conducted this the last couple years . Think it is about time that staff convey message of Directors that we will not be put into a position to do ~something that is rid i culous .such as wanting us to reduce the arsenic level below that which i s fo und i n normal drinking water . Can 't spend taxpayers money for something that is that ridiculous. Let them know that we will cooperate but will have to draw the line . Culver then asked Mr. Harper regarding Clean Water Bond Act of 197 4 , what is ratio of Federal govennment to State? Federal government 75%, State 12~% and Local government 12~%. FAH advised that we are attempting to have another meeting with EPA and Seate representatives sometime this next week to further negotiate on these requirements . Said that not only are we faced with expenditure but any expenditures that we make reduces our ability to build . This permit is for the next three years. Rather than take the requirements we have now, they are beefing them up and will require additional expenditures . Faced with SB 90 which means we can not raise our taxes. This takes money away from our construction program , and the construction program is really the thing that is going to improve our treatment . For monitoring have been spending $97 ,000 per year plus our investment in the SCCWRP program . Program they suggested )would cost $447 ,000 . Through negotiations and discussions, program now is down to $242 ,000, which is still about $150,000 more than we are paying right now. The program the stafffaould recommend would give us type of information meaningful to State and EPA and to us .in that it wo uld support some of our positions concerning EPA requirements . Would cost $176,000 . This program would give good information to have. We do now meet shellfish standards which are the most restrictive standards . They are considering some offshore bacteria sampling spots where th is may put us in a situation from a statistical standpoint that we could be in violation and would cause us to chlorinate , and this is in violation of California Ocean Plan. Chlorine is in short supply to begin with . Said these are some of the things we will be pointing out to these people from regulatory agencies. Question was asked if these program costs were annual or for three years . Mr . Harper answered they were annual figures for cost of Sanitation Districts to do this . It was then asked how much per hour is the lab time and was answered $8 .00 /hr . Mcinnis then asked if this had b een covered with the Orange County Chamber of Commerce and what their reaction was? FAH reported that h e had met with a Sanitation Task Force from the Chamber of Commerce today and discussed this with them. Main concern is XNat our agency reaching back into our system and insisting that the various industries connected to our s~stem go to pre-treatment of waste in accordance with some g uidelines being establis h ed b y EPA. Also being faced with charging users for capital cost recovery . Must find out how much of the treatment facilities are b ein g used by certain businesses and then collect a certain amount annually over a 30 year period , of which we will send h a l f back to the Treasurer in Washington, D .C . Some of the feeling is that this is a lright for a small community of 10,000 people but not in a complex situation such as ours . Mechanics of collecting fees very complex. This is something that has to be changed . Culver asked if we still had our lobbyist i n Washington and was answered , yes. Are concerned if this is a State mandated program , they may have to pay for it since we can't raise our taxes . -4 - Mr. Harper then stated that with the Dire ctor s permission , the staff would like to cont i nue to hold meet i ngs with State people and EPA and attempt to get a program somewhere in the neighborhood of $1 76 ,000 , and to get some of the r equ irements changed so we don 't have to chlori nate . He further mentioned that we just opened bids on a 46 MGD Activated Sludge Plant and h ope to award at next meeting if it meets approval of State. This will tak e care of 1 /3 of our flow . Culver then asked wh at happens if this bond act is not passed? Mr. Harper answered we will then receive 75% funding from EPA and our agency wou ld have to come up with 25%. Now we have to come u p with 1 2~%. The Chair then entertained a mot i on to authorize t he staff to cont i n u e discussions. It was so moved , seconded and carried. Directors ' attitude: No a rbitrary requ i rements without scientific backi ng . Must be meaningful or won't go along with them. Want to know why regarding requirements . (22) GC Report re sanitary districts' representation [ Perry asked in order to e l imi nate the waste of taxpayers ' money to (!,...~ have the statute changed , is i t poss ib le for the Boards of Directors ~ + to take action by motion to allow sanitary districts to have alternate (~ directors? Nissan stated that his opini on was that they cannot . Cannot do i t except by change of statute . No other way . (29a) Filing app li cation f or Federal & State g r ants Mr. Harper reported that the State Board was attempting to move some of these programs ahead and we had been axkR~ requested to subm it an application for g r ants f or 1 974 -75 year . Cu l ver asked if t his i sn 't a matter of policy? FAH advi sed that we are r equested each time we s u bmit an application for a federal g r ant that Board a uthorize the General Manage r to sign necesarry papers , etc . Motion was carried. (29b) Clean Water Bond Act of 1974 It was requested that befor e we get involved in this, wo uld l i ke t o hear arguments against it . FAH said argument for is that it reduces in half the l oca l agency 's participation and wil l help by $250 mi l lion . There is a need in Cali f ornia of $6 bill i o n to meet Stat e and Federal requ i rements . California receives about 10 % of the money allocated by EPA and thi s c orning year will be $4 billion available nationwide . Sai d he d idn 't know of any argument against it other than the bonds will have to b e sold and paid for over a long period of t i me which will cost about double the figure toJ;Ry bac k . Don't th i nk we will get State out of the picture . They will still continue to administer the program here in Cal i fornia. EPA feels that State does have a good program. Our concern is that we wish things would move along a lot faster and not so much paperwork. Are concerned tNat regarding $28 million for Improved Treatment at Plant No . 2 , that they are considering m~xiNg on the 16th moving this money into the next fiscal year wh i ch means we will be losing out on $28 million .because EPA will take approximate l y a year to submit report on project. Impoundment of one -ha lf the money at federal level has created some problems . Arbiso moved the resolution. planning and good foresi ght. items 29a & 29b . (54) Change Order to 2-14-1 Sai d i t was a matter o f l ong-range Chair cast a unanimous ballot f or Mr . Harper was asked to Rx~iai briefly exp lain. He explained history behind change of pipe size , etc. (55) Public Hearing on Reach 3 of S .A. River Interceptor Mr . Harper reported that two hearings were held on May 7th on proposal to extend S .A. River Interceptor . Project originally started at Plant 1. Next segment of this project will take pipe from La Palma to County line and then upper agencies will construct a col l ection system wh i ch is -5- -J" ~;r actually four interceptors that extend up in the Corona area, A ,)~ ~Riverside, San Bernardino , Chino and Ontario . Purpose is to bring .,r ~ brines accumulated in upper basin to our system for treatment at ~ Plant 2. Already constructed interplant line and now finishing construction of the diversion structures so we can be selective as to what flows come into Plant 1 . Hearing was on Reaches 3 & 4 --San Bernardino and Riverside area . Were about 30-40 people at 2:00 meet i ng , and testimony was taken relative to merits or demerits of the project. Questioned what would go into the line and t he affect on marine environment . Capacity for upstream agencies will be 30 MGD. We re approximately 20 people in attendance at the evening hearing . Discussion centered around questions as to how the capacity would be ~ used in the upper basin . Some 20 Tons of salt in upper basin. Much \..-of it comes from agricultural runoff and dairy wastes. There is a ,y concentrated study of whole river basin as far as water management \J .~ program. This is one of about eight things t hat are being p roposed ~\ 1 • to alleviate situation. Don 't feel improvement of water quality can ~, t(\,~"" move ahead until after this. (~~~ ;o/ ..._,, Clark asked what activity was on the other side? FA H said if this program is accepted by state and federal people, they will go into des i gn about the same time we will . They have done exactly the same preliminary work as we have and their construction program is supposedly synchronized with when we reach the County Line . They will have one of their major reaches finished . They will have considerable costs . Chaput asked what the schedule was as fgr as when we will be asked to make a decision? FAH stated that once we get the go ahead from the State, will come to Board for final decision on pipe size through canyon. They have 120 days in which to review this report so probably will be about four months from now. FAH asked Jack Kenney when they expect State will give go ahead on this . Said they expected about August . (57) Kaywood questioned whose expense and whose mistake it was re ??? Was answered contractor 's expense. (58) Questionedwhat tk~ warrant H22993 to Kasler Corp . for $470 ,2 02.3 0 ~was for and asked for clarification. FAH advised that this was the contractor working on 2 -14 -2 and the warrant was his progress payment on this job. (63) EIR for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer -Director stated that he was curious as to procedure with E I R's. Asked if they would consider this in detail at some other meeting and was answered yes -they wo uld . (66) Request of Restaurant Adventures , Inc. FAH reported that as directec by Board at last meeting, he discussed with Director of Public Works of City of Orange what the alternatives were for connection of this property . 1Sent standard agreement which City uses to connect to City when outside District to proponent. Two alternatives: (1) to connect to this l i ne in Chapman Avenue and (2) to construct a line some 900 ft. from the property t o the south to connect to CPawford Canyon Subtrunk Sewer. Construction requ ired would be an 8" line from 900 "ft., beginning at 8 ft . deep to some 20 ft . deep and would be extremely rocky . Would be expensive con- struction . In the District 's Master Plan for the area in which t he property is located , the subtrunk sewer which we propose to have extended in Chapman Avenue should serve this property . City has constructed a line which meets sizing and capacity requirements of District 7 and the intent is for us to purchase the line at some time . Clark asked whose intent it is to buy this. FAH answered it was the staff 's intent but didn't have any time frame on intent to purchase. Would look at amount of money that is in City 's Sanitation Di strict fund--some $120,000 in fund. Construction costs are some $46 ,000. In addition would be some administ rative and engineering and inspection costs. Said he had a discussion with Mr. Jackman regarding this. -6- Jackman said that he had briefly discussed this with his staff and City has no objection. Would like their standard agreement if developer wants to hook up to the sewer . Porter asked how many people woul d be involved in this establishment . Was answered about 200 at the most . Nissan added that there was an assessment district there also. Mr . Harper further reported that one other thing that he was directed to discusss was the possiblity of acquiring the line from the C:ity . Asked Mr. Fonley regarding this and the recommendation of their staff is not to sell the l ine. Nissan added that they didn't want to sell until they get rest of people to annex to City. Porter said he didn 't see any objection in letting the people hook into this line and Mr . Harper said we have no objection. Jackman stated that annexation is feasible as property is contiguous to border of City. Sal tarell i said he supported City 's position. Jackman added that the standard agreement states that developer would not oppose annexation if it becomes a possibility and it would become a possibility immediately because City is completing annexations right up to that area . Mr. Perrin of Restaurant Adventures then commented that standard form of agreement says that we N~Ni~ desire to annex to the City and we would basically do so, and this is not fundamentally our desire to do so . De sire to remain under the control of the County and not, at this time , to make any commitments to go into any city. Don 't have any feeling against Orange but would definitely like to stay with County . Going back down the other way to hook into sewer in Crawford Canyon would be more expensive but that would be the way we would attempt to go if it is possible to get all the other services along with that . Said if District was talking some $46 ,ooo+, he was not completely in a position to discuss figur es but would think that possib ly they could make some arrangements with the Sanitation Districts that might be condusive to get them to move along the line of acquisition at this ~time . Porter then asked Chairman Saltarelli if he had any further comment and Saltarelli stated that h e u nderst ood that Mr . Perrin was asking the Sanitation Districts to buy the line so he can avoid annexation to City of Orange and Orange is not ready to sell the line at this time. Don 't have any choice . Arrangeme nts have to be made wi th City of Orange. Nissan stated that we can acqu ire line even if they don 't want to sell but not iN a friendly way to go . Saltarelli asked if it benefits the District to do this at this time . Nisson said it benefits the people in the District rather than City of Orange and that is why we can take it away from Orange . Perrin added that they could run sewer back down Crawford Canyon Road but is somewhat an additional expense . Rather than spend funds on sewer line with rather minimum usage , might be more beneficial to work out a financial agreement with Sanitation Districts that would make it to their benefit to legally acquire the line. Porter stated that h e was not prepared to make a decision tonight and wa nt e d some more input . Saltare lli added that it i s a simp l e problem . If developer refuses to connec t to City of Orange, o nly other option is to build line and connect down to the othe::line . Would be a snap d ecision as to wh et h e r we want to buy that trunk line through condemnation proceedings . On the other hand , the developer n eeds a sewer connection . He can connect to our line or he can connect to Orange 's line . -7- • Clark said if there is a poss i bility the n maybe Mr. Harper should approach the City Council formally with a request to buy this line . There is no way to determine this evening i f they are interested in selling . If they don 't want to sell , then have to say, do we want it bad enough to condemn . Saltarelli then moved that the staff be authorized to contact Jthe City of Orange as to their desire to sell the trunk line and br i ng that information back to the Board at the next meeting . Porter asked if h e wanted to include in that motion conferring wit h Mr. Perrin as we ll and Saltarell i answered , certainly . The motion was seconded and carried. -8- COUNTY SANITATION . DI STR ICTS NOS . 1, 2, 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , AND 11 DISTRICT NO . 1 Direc tors present : Direct ors absent: DISTRICT NO . 2 Directors prese nt: Direct o r s absent : DI STR I CT NO . 3 Directors present : Directors absent: DISTRICT NO . 5 Directors present : Direct ors absent: DISTRICT NO. 6 Directors present : Directors absent: DISTRI CT NO. 7 Directors present: Dire ctors absent : DISTRICT NO . 1 1 Directors prese nt: Dire ctors absent : MINUTES . OF THE REGULAR MEETING May 8 , 1 9 74 -7 :3 0 p .rn . 10844 Ellis Avenue . Fount a in Valley , California ROLL CALL Jerry Patterson (Chairman), Robert Battin , and Donald Saltarelli Kerm Ri ma Dona ld Winn (Chairman), Michael Callah an , Dale Chaput , Ralph Clark, John Ga r the, Beth Graham , Miriam Kayw ood , Leonard Ma cKain , Bob Perry , George Scott, Joe Temple , and Fra nc es Wood None Donald Fox (Chairman), Gi lb ert Arbi so , Jr., Robert Battin , Thomas Blackman , Edward By rne, Alvin Coen , No r ma n Culver , Roland Edwards , John Garthe , Robert Nevil , Miriam Kaywood , Bernie Svalstad , and France s Wood · Edward Byrne , Phillip Cox , and Sonia Sonju Don Mcinnis (Ch airman) and Ralph Cl ark None Ellis Porter (C hairma n), Robert Battin, and Don Mcinn is Non e Donald Sa lt arelli (Chairman), Gabrielle Pryor , Ra lph Clark , J erry Patterson , Ellis Porter , Howard Rogers , and James J ackman Non e Henry Duk e (Ch a irma n), David Baker , and Norma Gibbs Non e 5/8/74 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary, William Clarke, Bruce Witcher, Kris Lindstrom, John Thomas, and Rita Brown Director Carolyn Ewing, C. Arthur Nissen, General Counsel, Harvey Hunt, Milo Keith, James Maddox, Jack Kenney, Ted Finster, Will Lindsay, and David Perrin A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, was held at 7:30 p.m. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invoca- tion, the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District's Board. * * * * * * * * * * DISTRICTS 2; 3 1 & 11 Excerpts re Board Appointments received and filed Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the minute excerpts from the Cities of Anaheim, Huntington Beach, and Los Alamitos be received and ordered filed; and that.the following representatives be seated as members of the Boards: CITY ACTIVE ALTERNATE DISTRICT(S) Anaheim Miriam Kaywood w. J. Thom 2 & 3 Huntington Harriett M. Wieder Alvin M. Coen 3 Beach Norma B. Gibbs Alvin M. Coen 11 Henry H. Duke Alvin M. Coen 11 Los Alamitos Charles L. Long Phillip H. Cox 3 DISTRICT 1 This being the annual meeting at Annual Election of which elections are to be held for Chairman of the Board Chairman of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared the nominations in order for the office of Chairman of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1. It was then moved and seconded: That Director Jerry M. Patterson be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Patterson as Chairman. DISTRICT 2 This being the annual meeting at Annual Election of which elections are to be held for Chairman of the Board Chairman of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared the nominations in order for the office of Chairman of the Board of Directors of County San~tation District No. 2. It was then moved and seconded: That Director Donald Winn be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There ~ being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Winn as Chairman . . -2- DISTRICT 3 Annual Election of Chairman of the Board the nominations of Directors of 5/8/74 This being the annual meeting at which elections are to be held for Chairman of each of the Board0 of Directors, the Secretary declared in order for the office of Chairman of the Board County Sanitation District No. 3. It was then moved and seconded: That Director Donald L. Fox be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Fox as Chairman. DISTRICT 5 Deferring Annual Election of Chairman of the Board Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Annual Election of Chairman of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be deferred until the regular meeting of the Board on June 12, 1974. DISTRICT 6 Annual Election of Chairman of the Board the nominations of Directors of This being the annual meeting at which elections are to be held for Chairman of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared in order for the office of Chairman of the Board County Sanitation District No. 6. It was then moved and seconded: That Director Ellis N. Porter be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was poll'ed and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Porter as Chairman. DISTRICT 7 Annual Election of Chairman of the Board the nominations of Directors of This being the annual meeting at which elections are to be held for Chairman of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared in order for the office of Chairman of the Board County Sanitation District No. 7. It was then moved and seconded: That Director Donald J. Saltarelli be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Saltarelli as Chairman. DISTRICT 11 Annual Election of Chairman of the Board the nominations of Directors of This being the annual meeting at which elections are to be held for Chairman of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared in order for the office of Chairman of the· Board County Sanitation District No. 11. It was then moved and seconded: That Director Henry H. Duke be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Duke as Chairman. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held April 10, 1974, be approved as ~ailed. DISTRicrr 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meetinG held April 10, 1974, be approved as mailed . . -3- 5/8/74 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held April 10, 1974, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held April 10, 1974, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held April 10, 1974, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held April 10, 1974, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held April 10, 1974, be approved as mailed. .'-". ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman Following introduction of new Directors, Chairman Porter announced that an orientation program and plant tour for Directors would be conducted on May 30th at 5:30 p.m. and urged all Board members to attend. The Chairman then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for 5:30 p.m., Wednesday, May 29, 1974, and invited Directors Sonia Sonju and Bernie Svalstad to attend and participate in the discussions. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager The General Manager briefly reviewed a current report which had been. provided each Director on the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. The project is a joint effort of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange and Los Angeles Counties, the Cities of San Diego and Los Angeles, and the County of Ventura, to develop regional scientific information on the coastal waters extending from Point Conception to the Mexican border. Funding of the study is presently $1/2 million per year to which the Districts contribute approximately 15%. . Mr. Harper referred Directors to an item on the Supplemental Agenda regarding consideration of a resolution endorsing the Clean Water Bond Act of 1974 (Proposition 2) which is on the June 4th ballot. He briefly reviewed the intent of the Proposition which is to provide bond funds to assist local communities in financing construction of wastewater quality control facilities to meet the objectives of the 1972 Amendments to the Water Pollution Control Act and advised Directors that if they chose to adopt the proposed resolution, their names and the municipalities which they represent would be released as favoring the Proposition. The General Manager reported that the staff had conducted a briefing on the JPL carbon process experimental project. In attendance at the meeting were representatives from the Environmental Protection Agency, State Water Resources Control Board, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Jet -4- 5/8/74 Propulsion Laboratory. The reactivated carbon process· appears to offer a technological breakthrough in wastewater treatment. The Districts' staff and JPL personnel have jointly proposed that EPA and the State Board provide a $3.5 million Step I grant to scale-up the existing pilot plant from 10,000 gallons per day to 1,000,000 gallons per day in order that full-scale design criteria and cost effectiveness may be determined.. Unde~ the proposed program~ this evaluation would take approximately three years. However, following the briefing and demonstration of the pilot plant, EPA representatives, while being quite enthusiastic about the process, expressed a desire to expedite the scale-up work. The State has requested that our Project Report submitted on March 1st be amended to request authorization for further development of the JPL process. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Counsel The General Counsel reported that, pursuant to the resolution adopted by the Boards of Districts Nos, 2, 3, and·7 expressing concern that State legislators be subject to the same requirements as local elected officials under the recently adopted "Conflicts of Interest" legislation, Senator James Whetmore had forwarded a communication advising that State officials are covered by the Act. The State Supreme Court is presently reviewing the constitutionality of said Act. With regard to pending ~awsuits, Mr. Nissan reported that in the case of District No. 3 vs. Amercoat, the court had ruled in favor of the defendants. In the case of Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. the suit had been settled as previously authorized by the Boards. He then briefly reviewed for the benefit of new Directors, the history of the litigation on Ocean Outfall No. 2, Job No. J-10, brought against the Districts by the contractor. The General Counsel reported that the recent Amendments to the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act will require payment of time and one-half for overtime and eliminate compensatory time off in lieu of cash remuneration for overtime services. The full. impact of the Amendments to the Act has not, as yet, been interpreted and Directors will be advised when further information becomes available. Mr. Nissan also reported on pending litigation regarding rights of way for trunk sewer construction in District No. 2. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file written report of Executive Committee ALL DISTRICTS Accepting proposal of Lee C. White to assist Districts in securing responsible "secondary treatment" de fini ti on Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the written report of the Executive Committee dated May 2, 1974, be received and ordered filed. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the proposal submitted by Lee C. White dated April 5, 1974, to assist the Districts and other consenting West Coast sewerage agencies in securing an environmentally sound and fiscally responsible Federal "secondary treatment" definition which is consistent with the State-adopted California Ocean Plan, on a cost-sharing basis with said consenting agencies for a reaximum fee not to exceed $6,000 plus Districts' propor- tionate share of actual incidental expenses. -5- 5/8/74 ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing execution of Memorandum of Understanding re EPA construction grant for JPL wastewater treatment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the General Mana~er be authorized to execute a Memorandum of Understanding with the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) of the California Institute of process mental Protection carbon wastewater Technology in support of an Environ- Agency construction grant for the JPL reactivate~ treatment process. ALL DISTRICTS Directing staff to prepare plans and specifications for Replacement of Interplant Gas Line, Job No. I-4R and that the General Manager for said work. ALL DISTRICTS ·Directing staff to prepare plans and specifications for Installation of Gas Metering Equipment 2 Job No. I-4-3 authorized to advertise for ALL DISTRICTS Directing staff to investigate feasibility of imnroving the quality of digester gas Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff be authorized and directed to prepare plans and specifications for Replacement of Interplant Gas Line, Job No. I-4R, be authorized to advertise for bids Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff be authorized and directed to prepare plans and specifications for Installation of Gas Metering Equipment, Job No. I-4-3, and that the General Manager be bids for said work. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff be authorized and directed to further investigate the feasibility of improving the quality of digester gas and report back to the Boards the cost effective-~ ness of removing moisture and carbon dioxide content from the digester gas. ALL DISTRICTS Directing staff to negotiate for sale of surplus digester gas Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff be authorized and directed to negotiate with General Crude Oil Company, Southern California Edison Company, and others, for the sale of any excess digester gas, to be conditioned upon availability of said excess gas, and incorporating an escalation clause to reflect increased demand and an adjustment in the rates to reflect improvements in quality of the gas supplied. ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel reported that Report of General Counsel a communication had been received re Alternate Directors from the attorney for the Garden for Sanitary Districts Grove Sanitary District inquiring as to the interpretation of the provisions of the Health and Safety Code for alternate Directors for Sanitary District representatives on a Sanitation District Board of Directors. Mr. Nissan briefly reviewed the history of the legislation in this regard and advised Directors that, in his opinion, the present law does not allow for alternate Sanitary District Directors on the Board of a Sanitation District. In ~/ response to a question regarding the possibility of the Districts' Joint Boards of Directors adopting a motion to allow Sanitary Districts to have alternate Directors, the General Counsel advised that this could only be acco~plished by a change of the state law. . -6- 5/8/74 ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that Authorizing staff to under the provisions of the 1972 continue discus~ions Amendments to the Federal Water· with EPA and l~~QCB Pollution Control Act, a National re proposed NPDES permit Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit must be issued to all dischargers to navigable waters. In the State of California, ~ the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has relegated issuance of these permits to the State Water Resources Control Board. However, Orange County is in a rather unique situation because our ocean outfall extends past the three-mile state limit. Therefore, EPA, jointly with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, will conduct hearings on the Districts' permit application. Our staff has previously reported to the Boards on stipulations contained in the proposed permit which appear to go beyond the intent of the Act. Because of our concern and the complexities of the proposed new permit regulations, the hearing on the permit was deferred from May 3rd to June 7th. Our staff has been meeting with representatives of EPA, the Regional and State Boards, State Fish and Game Commission, and State and County Health Departments in an attempt to modify those provisions of the permit regulations which cannot be justified. The General Manager then introduced Kris Lindstrom, the Districts' Environmental Specialist, who summarized the provisions of the permit and reviewed our staff's efforts with the regulatory agencies in this regard. · The Board then entered into a general discussion concerning the proposed regulations to be ·imposed under the NPDES permit. It was the consensus of the Directors that the staff should convey to the regulatory agencies that the Boards will support regulations which are fiscally sound and meet realistic environmental goals but would vigorously oppose unfounded and fiscally irresponsible regulations. The Boards also expressed their concern that regulations be uniformly applied to all wastewater dischargers throughout the state. Following further discussion concerning the impact of the proposed regulations on the Districts' operations and funding requirements, it ·was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff be authorized to continue to meet with federal and state representatives regarding proposed NPDES permit requirements to obtain rational permit regulations; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the staff be directed to convey the position of the Districts' Boards of Directors regarding said regulations. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Changing disability payment period for industrial accidents That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 74-40, amending Resolution No. 70-3, as amended, to change the disability payment period for industrial accidents to comply with recent legislative actions. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to arrance open house and plant inspection tour Moved, seconded; and duly carried: That the staff be authorized to make arrangements for an open house and plant inspection tour of the Districts' facilities, to be held September 25, 1974, for elected officials and key staff members of the Districts' member agencies. -7- 5/8/74 ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 6 to plans and specifications for Job No. I-8-3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Influent Metering and Diversion Structure at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. I-8-3, E.T.I. Change authorizing an addition of $18,ooo.oo to the contract with & Kordick, a Joint Venture, be approved. Copy of this Order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file Financial Report of Director of Finance Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the quarterly Financial Report of the Director of Finance for the nine-month period ending March 31, 1974, be received, ordered filed, and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That budget transfers as recommended by the Director of Finance be authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file staff progress report on Treatment Plant Construction Projects received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Certification of the General Manager received and ordered filed Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff progress report dated May 2, 1974, on Treatment Plant Construction Projects be Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the certification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment be received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried by roll call vote: Approval of Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant books That the Districts' Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant books be approved for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay: Joint Operating Capital Outlay Revolving $122,540.52 388,234.46 $510,774.98 in accordance with the warrants listed on pages "I-1" through "I-4", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing filing application for Federal and State grants Following a brief report by the General Manager, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 74-76, authorizing filing application for Federal and State grants for publicly-owned wastewater treatment works ~ and providing certain assurances. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes . . -8- ALL DISTRICTS Endorsing Clean Water Bond Act of 1974 facilities, it was moved, 5/8/74 Following a general discussion regarding the proposed Clean Water Bond Act of 1974 as it relates to State and Federal construction funding of sewerage seconded, and duly carried:· That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 74-77, endorsing the Clean Water Bond Act of 1974 (Proposition 2). Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:47 p.m., May 8, 1974. DISTRICT 5 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:47 p.m., May 8, 1974. DISTRICT 6 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:47 p.m., May 8, 1974. DISTRICT 11 Authorizing execution of Quitclaim Deed to Southern California Edison Company re Newland Avenue Force Main relocation Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 74-71-11> authorizing execution of Quitclaim Deed to Southern California Edison Company for a portion of District's easement which is no longer needed due to the relocation of Newland Avenue Force Main. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 11 Approving Change Order No. 1 to plans and specifications for Contract No. 11-12 Moved, seconded, and. duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension, Contract No. 11-12, authorizing an addition of $745.31 to the contract with Kordick & Son, Inc., be approved. Copy of this Change Order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 11 Receive and file staff progress report re Contract No. 11-12 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff progress report dated May 2, 1974, on construction of the Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension, Contract No. 11-12, be received and ordered filed. -9- 5/8/74 DISTRICT 11 Receive and file staff progress report re Contract No. 11-12 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff progress report dated May 2, 1974, on construction of the Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension, Contract No. 11-12, be received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of Suspense Fund warrants That the Districts' Suspense Fund warrant book be approved for signature of the Chairman of District No. 3, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $319,042.35, in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of warrants That the District's Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund warrant book be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $77,679.90, in accordance with the warrants listed on page "III", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 11 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared.the meeting so adjourned at 8:49 p.m., May 8, 19 74. DISTRICT 3 Approving plans and soecifications for Contract No. 3-19 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of· Directors adopt Resolution No. 74-72-3, approving plans and specifications for Imperial Relief Interceptor, Reaches 22 & 23, Contract No. 3-19, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the bid date upon receipt of necessary permits from the State Division of Highways. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Receive and file Draft Environmental Impact Report for Knott Interceptor, REaches 5 through 8 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 through 8, dated May, 1974, be received and ordered filed; and that the staff be directed to file a Notice of Completion in accordance with the Local Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, FURTHER MOVED: That June 26, 1974, be established as the date for which all comments must be received on said Environmental Impact Report. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Receive and file staff progress report That the staff progress report "-"' re Contract No. 3-18 dated May 2, 1974, on construction of the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18, be received and ordered filed. -10- 5/8/74 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of warrants That the District's Operating Fund and Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund warrant books be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay: Operating Fund $ 300.00 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 475,,796.30 $476,096.30 in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:50 p.m., May 8, 1974. DISTRICT 2 Approving plans and specifications for Contract No. 2-18 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 74-73-2, approving plans and specifications for Carbon Canyon Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-18, and that the General Manager be authorized to advertise for bids on June 4, 1974. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Approving Change Order No. 13 to plans and specifications for Contract No. 2-14-1 Following a brief staff report on the sizing of the Santa Ana River Inter- ceptor, it w~s moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 13 to the.plans and specifications for the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, authorizing an addition of $11,544.00 to the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting Company, be approved. Copy of this Change Order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Report on Public Hearing re Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reach 3 The.General Manager reported on hearings conducted May 7~h by the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) on the remaining reach of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, from La Palma Avenue to the Orange County line. Mr. Harper then briefly reviewed the history of the Interceptor which will be constructed by the District to accommodate increasing flows within District No. 2 and provides a 30 mgd capacity to remove salt brines from the upper basin which are presently contaminating the underground water supply. This project is an integral part of the State's master plan for improving the water quality in the Santa Ana River Basin. During the discussion which followed, the Directors were advised of the anticipated schedule for processing the grant applications for remaining reaches of the Interceptor. Approval by the State Water Resources Control Board is expected during the month of August, following which the matter will be further considered by the Board of Directors of District No. 2. -11- ~/8/74 DISTRICT 2 Authorizing payment to Oranee County Flood Control District re Contract No. 2-14-1 January, 1974, in connection River Interceptor from Plant No. 2-14-1, be authorized. DISTRICT 2 Receive and file staff progress report re Contracts Nos. 2-14-1 and 2-14-2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That payment to Orange County Flood Control District in the amount of $844.48 for inspection services for the period November, 1973, through with construction of the Santa Ana No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract Following a brief discussion, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff progress report dated May 2, 1974, on construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, and the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-2, be received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 2 Approval of warrants Following a brief discussion, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the District's Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund warrant book be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $566,748.02, in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board cf Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The '--' Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:03 p.m., May 8, 1974. DISTRICT 7 Approving Change Orders Nos. 1, 2, and 3 re Contract No. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-3E-l 7-3E-l, authorizing changes Inc., be approved: Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the following Change Orders to the plans and specifications for Diversion Structures, Contract No. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, and to the contract with Halopoff & Sons, Change Order No. 1 -Addition of $1,064.88 Change Order No. 2 -Adjustment of Engineer's quantities and addition of $690.60 Change Order No. 3 -Time extension of 16 calendar days Copies of these Change Orders are attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Accepting Contract No. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, That the Board of Directors adopt '-11 7-3B-l, 7-3E-l as Resolution No. 74-74-7, accepting complete Di version Structures, Contract no. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-3E-l as complete; authorizing execution of Notice of Completion upon receipt of letters of compliance from agencies issuing permits in connection with said contract; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -12- DISTRICT 7 Receive and file Draft EnvironmentRl Im.£.Q:_ct Report for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reaches 10 through 18 5/8/74 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reaches 10 through 18,-be received and ordered filed; and that the staff be directed to file a Notice of Completion in accordance with the Local Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, FURTHER MOVED: That June 26, 1974, be established as the final date for which all comments must be received on said Environmental Impact Report. DISTRICT 7 Authorizing initiation of proceedings re Annexation No. 4o Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 74-75-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 4.38 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Santiago Boulevard and Walnut Avenue (Proposed Annexation No. 40 -Tract No. 8266 to County Sanitation District No. 7). Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Receive and file letter from James A. and Dorothy G. Moulton re annexation of territory Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the letter from James A. and Dorothy G. Moulton dated April 10, 1974, requesting annexation of approximately one acre of territory in the vicinity of Cowan Heights Drive between Briar Lane and Rangeview Drive, be received, ordered filed, and referred to staff for study and recommendation. · DISTRICT 7 Further consideration of request of Restaurant Adventures, Inc., and directing staff to contact City of Orange re acquisition of sewer in Chapman Avenue The General Manager reported on discussions with the City of Orange staff regarding alternative means by which property in an unincorporated area of District 7 at the intersection of Chapman Avenue and Crawford Canyon Road could be served. One alternative is to connect to the City line in Chapman Avenue. A second alternative would be for the developer to construct a line to connect to the Crawford Canyon Sub-trunk Sewer approximately 900 feet away. Following a general discussion by Directors of the alternatives available for serving the property in question, during which Mr. David Perrin of Restaurant Adventures, Inc. addressed the Board with regard to the position of his firm on this matter, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff be directed to formally inquire of the Orange City Council if it is the City's desire to sell its interest in the Chapman Avenue Sewer located east of Solano Avenue. DISTRICT 7 Receive and file claim of Southern California Gas Company re College Avenue Force Main Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the claim of Southern California Gas Company dated April 24, 1974, in the amount of $2,126.10 re alleged damages incurred by construc- tion of the College Avenue Force Main, be received, ordered filed, and referred to General Counsel for recommendation. -13- 5/8/74 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of warrants That the District's Facilities Revolving Fund warrant book be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $29,297.09, in accordance with the warrants listed on page "III", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:25 p.m., May 8, 1974. -14- ards o Directors of ation Districts Nos. 1, 7, and 11 WARRANT NO. 22805 22806 22807 ~808 ~809 ·22810 22811 t 22812 . 22813 22814 22815 22816 22817 22818 22819 22820 22821 22822 22823 22824 22825 22826 22827 22828 22829 22830 22831 !832 ~833 22834 22835 22836 22837 22838 22839 22840 22841 22842 22843 22844 22845 22846 22847 22848 -22849 ; 22850 22851 22852 22853 22854 22855 22856 '"'~857 ~858 22859 22860 22861 22862 22863 22864 22865 22866 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Air Conditioning Supply Co., Freight All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings & Pipe Supplies American Kleaner Mfg. Co., Inc., Valve American Pneumatic Tool Co., Machine Equipment American Society for Testing & Materials, Technical Manuals City of Anaheim, Power Anaheim Truck & Transfer, Freight The Anchor Packing Co., Gaskets Apco Supply, Hardware Aquatic Center, Safety Supplies Associated Concrete Products, Inc., Manhole Sections Azusa Western, Concrete Bank of America, Bond & Coupon Collection Banning Battery Co., Batteries Beckman Instruments, Inc., Cable Bell Pipe & Supply Co., Pump & Valves Bender Machine, Inc., Engine Repair Blower Paper Co., Janitorial & Maintenance Supplies $ AMOUNT 33.50 872.39 11.82 1,168.81 35. 75 28.73 6.64 9.26 6.15 10.00 57.24 293.25 138.45 261.83 80.14 443.93 732.66 Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Engine Parts & Magneto Repair Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams Broadlick Art Supply, Certificate Framing 197.58 389.44 39.00 32.70 28.22 Bruning Division, Drafting Supplies C & R Reconditioning Co., Engine Repair & Pump Parts CWPCA, Annual Conference Expense Cal's Cameras, Photo Supplies Cal State Seal Co., Flange Gaskets California Collator Sales, Binding Supplies Leonard Carney, CWPCA Conference Expense 695.0:l 208.0J 37.08 78.13 56 .16 John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services (MO 4-10-74) Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co., Compressor Parts 79.70 5,021.51 405 .05 32.86 271.60 34.98 1,269.28 575 .14 22.36 255.68 William N. Clarke, CWPCA Conference Expense College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials & Hardware Concrete Tie, Building Materials Consolidated Electric Distr., Electric Supplies F. B •. Cook Corp., Bulkhead Removal Copeland Motors, Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa County Water District Mr. Crane, Crane Rental Crest Leasing, Leased Vehicle - 4 Months Crown Controls, Inc., Electric Cable Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies Deaver Manufacturing Co., Truck Repair John M. Deck, Equipment Parts Diamond Core Drilling Co., Concrete Sawing Ducommun Metals & Supply Co., Steel Dunn-Edwards Corp., Paint Supplies Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Enchanter, Inc., Oceanographic Services (MO 2-13-74) Engineers Sales Service Co., Inc., Pump Parts Ensign Products Co., Freight Enterprise Printing, Printing Supplies & Printing Fischer & Porter Co., Metering Equipment & Training Clifford A. Forkert, Construction Survey PW-033 City of Fountain Valley, \'later William H. Fox, Employee Mileaee & CWPCA Conference Freeway Machine & Welding Shop, Machining Larry Fricker Co., Inc., Weed Killer Gar-Wood L.A. Truck Equip., Inc., Truck Equipment Garden Grove Lumber & Cement, Building Material · Gasket Manufacturing Co., Gaskets General Electric Supply Co., Electric Supplies I-1 6.oo 407.69 586.34 165.33 869.52 105.00 51.42 45.00 175.15 22.0J 620.87 3,20~.oo 138.86 17.15 113.88 1,125.92 826.05 40.00 Expense 66.85 1,033.50 110.25 83.21 172.99 68.58 1,050.72 WARRANT NO. 22867 22868 22869 22870 22871 22872 22873 22874 22875 22876 22877 22878 22879 22880 22881 22882 22883 22884 22885 22886 22887 22888 22889 22890 22891 22892 22893 22894 22895 22896 22897 22898 22899 22900 22901 22902 22903 22904 22905 22906 22907 22908 22909 22910 22911 22912 22913 22914 22915 22916 22917 22918 22919 22920 22921 22922 22923 2292L~ 22925 22926 22927 22928 22929 IN FAVOR OF General Telephone Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine Contract 1-1-73 Golden West Fertilizer Co., Grit Removal Graybar Electric Co., Electric Supplies & Hardware Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Repair Hach Chemical Co., Inc., Chemicals Halsted & HoGgan, Inc., Pump Parts Allan Hancock Foundation, Technical Manuals Fred A. Harper, Various Mtg., COD & Conference Expenses Harrisons & Crosfield, Inc., Chemical Coagulants Heathkit Electronic Center, Communication Equipment L. Heitman Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Rental Hercules, Inc., Chemical Coagulants Hertz Car Leasing Division, Leased Vehicles Hewlett Packard Co., Equipment Repair James E. Hoagland Co. & Hoagland Engineering Co., Equip. Rental & Piping Honeywell, Inc., Telemetering Supplies House of Trophies, Director's Plaque Howard Supply Co., Pipe Supplies, Boiler Parts & Valves Hundley Company, Inc., Electronic Equipment & Controls City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Beach Equipment Rentals, Equipmen~ Rental Huntington Laboratories, Inc., Lab Supplies Industrial Asphalt, Asphalt Ingersol-Rand, Compressor Parts Inland Nut & Bolt Co., Hardware International Harvester Co., Truck Parts Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies & Fittings Kilsby Tubesupply Co., Steel Kleen Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware & Tools LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Equip. Parts & Hardware L & N Uniform, Uniform Services - 2 Months Lacal Company, Inc., Lubricant Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Equipment Parts AMOUNT 2,738.65 4,014.64 1,128.00 157.07 23.69 123 .r·. l~O.~ t+l.74 270.17 689 .OC>- 105 .95. 1, 453. 50• 315.88 572.96 67.50 1,416.69 221.03 25.21 3,833.36 369.57 23.59 574.63 32.25 10.29 281.53 520.86 33.55 284 .91 63.32 360.~7 415.~ 1,510.46 4,405.40 24.68 Kris Lindstrom, Employee Mileage & CWPCA Conference Expense· R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., Paving Materials McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Hardware 705.78 102.08 68.90 60.91 Marine Biological Consultants, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring (MO 11-14-73) Missimers, Inc., Hardware Moore Products Co., Compressor Parts Morrison Co., Check Valves National Chemsearch, Solvent & Cleaner National Fire Protection Association, Manuals National Lumber & Supply, Inc., Building Materials Nates Saw & Lawnmower Shop, Saw Sharpening City of Newport Beach, Water C. Arthur Nissen, General Counsel Retainer OFCCO Construction Co., Inc., Boiler Repair Office Equipment Co., Equipment Repair Orange County Stamp Co., Rubber Stamps Osterbauer Compressor Service, Compressor Parts Pacific Telephone Norman Parsons, Employee Mileage M. c. Patten & Co., Inc., Control Repair & Steam Traps Jose Pena, Weed Removal Philadelphia Gear Corp., Pump Gear E-067 (MO 5-2-73) Postmaster Lee Potter Comp:;iny, Inc., Maintenance Supplies Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage Rapid Color, Inc., Printing Red's Frame & ln1eel, Truck Repair The Republic Supply Co. of Calif., Hardware I-2 4,904.37 239.22 44.17 675.36 1,086.75 3.93. 99 .19· 14. 70· 388. 92! 80~.oo 248.21 18.oo -21. 76 102.75 462.41 15.7'3 309~ 30J .0::) 7,372.30 500.08 195. 78 38.10 249. r-(4 25.13 76.60 WARRANT NO. 22930 22931 22932 22933 22934 '2935 ~2936 > 22937 . 22938 ' 22939 t 22940 ' 22941 22942 22943 22944 22945 22946 22947 22948 22949 22950 22951 22952 22953 22954 22955 22956 22957 . 22958 22959 ~960 ¥2961 22962 22963 22964 22965 22966 22967 22968 22969 22970 22971 22972 IN FAVOR OF Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Parts & Freight $ Royal Plumbing & Heating Co., Lateral Repair San Jose Hyatt House, CWPC.A Conference Expense Santa Ana Blueprint Co., Printing Santa Ana Engraving Co., Printing Supplies Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Chemicals Scientific Products, Lab Supplies Scott Refrigeration Service, Inc., Air Cond. System Repair City of Seal Beach, Water Richard J. Shaffer, Warehouse & Purchasing Study Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies Signal Flash Co., Barricade Rental Fred Sinasek, Employee Mileage Singer Business Machines, Maintenance .Agreement South Orange Supply, Piping Supplies Southern Calif. Edison Southern Calif. Gas Co. Southern Calif. Water Co. Sparkletts Drinking Water Co., Bottled Water Speed-E .Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Oil co·. of· Calif., ·Gasoline Sully Miller Contracting Co., Backfill Material Surveyors Service Co., Survey Supplies J. Wayne Sylvester, CASA Meeting Expense Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage & Supplies Reimbursement Taylor-Dunn, Equipment Parts Technical Book Co., Technical Manual Techni-Tool, Inc., Tools John Thomas, CWPC.A Conference Expense Triangle Steel & Supply Co~, Steel U. S. Equipment Co., Inc., Compressor Parts Union Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline & Services United Auto Parts, Truck Parts United Reprographics, Inc., Printing Utility Body Co., Truck Parts Valve & Primer Corp., Valves John R. Waples R.S., Odor Consultant Warren & Bailey Co., Inc., Fittings Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc., Engine Parts West Print, Printing Wilson Engine & Equipment Co., Engine Parts Russell Wold, Employee Mileage Xerox Corp., Reproduction Services AMOUNT 1,116.22 48.oo 252.11 89.37 7.95 54.48 54.16 110.16 20.29 400.00 1,987.33 334.3~ 47.58 32.75 68.50 35,745.37 1,290.17 3.00 90.72 284.51 3,645.68 44.77 28.78 33.51 176.15 119.79 19.61 120.81 46.60 3,281.08 76.22 6.07 369.85 50.35 84.57 . 186 .56 218.20 73.56 47.26 58.60 232.72 123.48 1,045.49 TOT.AL JOINT OPERATING $ 122,540.52 I-3 WARRANT NO. 22973 22974 229~(5 22976 22977 22978 22979 2 2980 22981 22982 22983 22984 22985 22986 22987 22988 CAPI TAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Almquist Tool & Equ ipment Co ., Too l s Tommy Ayres Ch e vro l et , New Trucks (MO 2 -1 3 -74 ) J ohn Ca r o llo Engrs ., En g inee ring -Pl ant Construction Co nst r uctors Suppl y Co ., Tools De corating Trends I nt 1 l., Window Blinds E .T .I . & Ko rdi ck, Contractor I -8 -3 E.T.I . & Kordick, Retention Release Contracto r P2 -ll-l Hemi sphe r e Constructors, Co ntra ctor P2 -21 Joe Kay Des i gn & Const ructio n Co ., Retention Release Contractor PW-J34 LBWS , Inc ., Welding Ma ch ine Motorola, Inc., Co mmunication Equi pment J. Ray Construction Co ., Contracto r J-13 SSP Truck Equipment, I nc ., Truck Bodies Twining Laboratories, Compaction Tests J-13 United Repro g raphics, Inc ., Plans & Spec s Pl -16 Ziebarth & Zi ebarth & Alper, Re tention Release J -4 -1 TOTAL CAPITA L OUTLAY REVO LVING TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF I-4 AMOUNT $ 621 .27 5,704.92 26 ,176 .68 337 ., 20 0 ._., 54' 900 .oo . 63 ,302 .40 ·. 53,42J .65 · 6 8 5 .2 0; 813 .38 1,460 .55 1 38,058 .57 1,802 .00 200.00 3,137.60 37,J.n3 .35 $ 388, 234 . J.~6 $ 510,774.98 DISTRICT NO . 2 ACC UMULATED CAP ITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WA RR ANT NO . I N FAVOR OF 22989 22990 City of Anaheim, Facility Re location 2-14-2 $ AMOUNT 1 ,731 .89 871.8 2 161 .2 5 1,758 .00 470,202 .30 2?091 C...._;92 22 993 22994 ~2995 ~2996 229 9 7 22998 22999 2 JO 23001 23002 .. 23003 2 3004 Clean Water Consultant s , Eng ineering Service Anaheim Forebay Project Phas e II County of Orange , Compaction Testing 2-14-1 and 2-14-2 Epimenia Diaz and Mig uel Gomez , Easement 2-14-1 Kasler Corporation & L .H. Woods & Sons, Contractor 2-1 4-2 Lowry and Associates, Engineering Se rvi ce 2-14-3 & 2-1 5 , Construct ion Survey 2-14-1 & 2-14-2 Orange County Flood. Con trol District, Inspecti on 2-14-1 Safeco Ti tle Insurance, Easement 2 -14-1 Sully Miller Cont racting Company , Co ntractor 2 -14-1 Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Inspection 2-14-2 DISTRICT NO . 3 OPERATING FU ND WARRANTS I N FAVO R OF C. Arthur Ni ssan, Legal Serv ic es Amercoa.t Suit AC CUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS I N FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering Service 3 -19 , 3-20 -1, 3-20 -2 , 3-20 -3 , Co n struct i on Survey 3-18, Design Survey 3 -20 -1, 3-20 -2 Te st ing Enginee r s , Inc ., P ipe Inspection 3 -18 A.G. Tu t o r Co., Inc . & N.M. Salib a, Contractor 3-18 DIS TR ICTS NOS . 3 & 11 SUSPE NSE FUND WARRANTS I N FAVO R OF J . F. Shea Company, I nc ., Contractor 3 -1 7 County of Orange , Compact ion Testing 3-17 II $ $ 1 4 ,619 .7 5 844 .48 1 5.00 74,758 .53 1,785 .00 566,748 .02 300 .00 $ 45,647 .50 2 ,080 .00 428,068 .80 $ 475,796.30 $ 476,096 .30 $ 318,972 .64 69 .71 $ 319,0 42 .35 DISTRic rr NO . 7 FA CILITIES HEVOLVING FUND WARRANTS WA RRANT NO . IN FAVOR OF 23005 23006 23007 23008 23009 23010 23011 Boyle Engineering, P reliminary Engineering 7 -6 -5 Ha.lopoff and Sons , Inc., Contractor 7 -3A -l , 7 -3A -2 , 7 -3B -l , 7 -3E -l DISTRICT NO . 11 ACC UMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF County of Orange, Compaction Tes ting 11-12 Huntington Cap ital Corporation , Refund Annexation Fees Kordick and Son , Inc ., Contractor 11 -12 Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Inspec tion 11 -12 Twining Laboratories, Compaction Testing 11 -12 III $ AMOUNT 4 ,337 .50 24,959 .59 $ 29,297 .c.v $ 100 .59 2,772 .00 73,650 .8 1 312 .00 844 .50 $ 77,679 .90