Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-03-13COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX Bl 27. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 927-08 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) March 7, 19_7 4 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 Gentlemen.: TELEPHONES: AR EA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directo~s of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, wii'l be held: WEDNESDAY EVENING, MARCH 13, 1974 AT 7!30 P.M. 10844 ELLI~ AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ·~/'"+~~-J!t:L- s e c .t--e tar y t7 Tentative adjournmentsprior to next regular meeting: Exec u t iv c Co rmn 1 t t E~ e - 5 : 3 0 p • m • , !\1 arch 1 9 , 19 7 4 ' District No. 2 -(Date in March to be determined by Board) MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS. REGULAR MEETING March 1 3 , 1 974 -7:30 p.m. Post Offic e Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 The following is a brief explanation of the more import ant n on-routine items which app ear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanator y . Warrant lists a re not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but will app ear in the supplemental agenda available a t the meeting . Joint Boards · Nos. 10 and 11 -Report and Recommend ations o f the Execut ive Committe e . The Committee met on February 26th with Directors Hyde and Root as g uests. A report of the deliberations and recommenda- tions was mailed to all active Directors ·on March 4th . No . l O(a) -Repor t of the ·spec i al Comm i ttee· on Feasibil ity of Electronic Data Processing System . Th e special comm itt ee met with the Executive Comm i ttee to review the final re port o f the consultant, Peat , Marwick , Mi tche ll ·and Company . The summary of the final report wa s included in the mailing of the Executive Committee report . · Represe.ntatives of the c oniult ant will make a pr~s~ntation to the Joint Boards o n March 1 3th . No . 12 -Report ·of the General Counsel on "Conflict of Int erest" Lesig lation . Pursuant to the instructions of the Joint Boards , t he General Counsel met with the Ex e cutive Committee t o discuss pro - posed guid elines to comp l y with the recently-enacted "c onflict of interest " legislation . He advised that th6 Attorney 's Comm itt ee of the California Association of Sanitation ·Agenc i es (CASA) was meeting on March 8t h to draw uniform gu idelines to comply with th e l aw . The Committee directed M-r . Ni sson to research the matter furth er and report to the Joint Boards March 1 3th . No. 13 -Amendme nts to the Districts' Uniform Guidelines . Implementin r-; the Ca lifornia. Envirorunental Act of 1970. The Ge neral Counsel has submitted to the staff, Amendments to the Districts' Gu idelines to comply with the recently-adopted changes in the Caiifornia Envitonm~nta~ Act. The a~tion appearing on the agenda approves the required .changes to the 'Districts' Guide- lines. No. 14 -Appearance before Joint Senate and House Committ ee o~ Science and Astro nautics in Wash ingt on, D~C. As a result of the highly . successful pilot work being con- ducted by Cal Tech Jet Propulsion Laboratory personnel at Plant No. 1, officials.of NASA h~ve aske~ that we send a statf member to appear before the Joint ·Senate ·and Hous~ Committee ,.on science ·and Astronautics, ·to encourage further financial support for the con-. tinuation and expansion of the researc h efforts on JPL'~ reactivated carbon improved wastewater treatment process. .(The JPL project is · currently financed by a NASA $60,000 research grant,. Our staff has been wo~king very closely with the JPL pilot ~ ·· plant technicians and we believe the process results point to a ·possible b r eakt h ro ugh in wastewater treatment. We therefore re- quest the opportunity to pr.esent our comments to the NASA Coinmittee. :No. 15 -EPA Interpretation of User Cha~g~s. The Di s tricts '· Dir ector· of Finance, who is currently . serving on a special committee of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) on user charge s and industrial cost re- covery, has advised that EPA staff personnel are ruling out the use of ad valorem taxes ·a s revenue to comply with the intent of Federal legis l at i on . The AMS A spe cial comm it tee is .requesting that the r.J.ajor agencies who do utili ze ad valorem tax as ·a means · o·f collecting their r evenue adopt ·re so lutio ns requesting EPA to r~·qonsider their interpretation of . t;he 1972 Federal Water Pol- lution Control Act A"11en dments to· allow apy revenue pro du cing system that accomp l ishes a n equi tab l~ distrib ution o f · costs b etwee n in- dustri al and domestic classes of user s. It is .recommended that the propos ed re so lut ion be ado~ted. No . 16 -Draft En.vironmental I mpact Report f or Improved Trea t ment at Plant iJ o. 2 . On Ma r ch 4th , a ll a ctive Directors were mailed copies of the Environr.J.enta l Impact Report for fisca l year 1 9 7 3 -74 and 1 974-7 5 pr ojec ts at Pl ant No . 2 . 'l'he Districts ' cons ul tant , Richar d Te rry and As s ociates/Environmental Scienc e and Servic es , has completed his e nvironmental assess~e nt of the p roposed se conda ry trea t r.J.ent f acili t ies and discuss es .th e envirorunenta l f actors requ ired b y the State and Federa l r csu l at o ~y acenc ie s · a nd the Ca lifornia Environ - ment al Qua lity Act of 1970 . If th e D~rectors f i nd that the draft r eport is in order , the Manage r should be authorized to fi le a Notic e of Comp l e tion ~it h th0 Secretary o f the Resources Acency or . a Notic e of Int e nt with the S ta t e Cl e a rihghouse . Afte r the no tic e -2- ·.- has been authorized, the District will send copies of the draft report for review and comment to all public agencies having .juris- diction over the proposed projects and to all municipalities within the Districts. The staff will review the report at the Board meeting prior to consideration of action filing the Notice of Com- pletion. No. 17 -Consent Calendar. The following agenda items fall into this category in accordance with the definition established by the Boards: (a) ·and (b) -CloS'eout of Job No. Pl-9-1,' Additional Secondary Treatment at Plant No. 1. This project involves the constructio~ of .an additional secondary treatment trickling filter (5 mgd) and im- provements to the Plant No. 1 water supply system. The original construction contract' was $786,300. To date, the Board has authorized two Change Orders for additional work not provided for in the plans and specifications totaling $28,943.j9, A ~ubstantial amount of the con- tract involved revamping existing facilities and required plan modifications in the field to accomplish the work.· The Change Orders o n this job are less than 5% of the contract price. R~solution No. 74-4 0 accepts the job as complete and authorizes r~cordation of a Notice of Completion of Work. (c) Change Order No. ·2 to ·Job ·No·.· J-4-1 tinc·r ·e·a:s·ed ·Water Reuse Facilitie·s· ·at Plant· ·No.· 2). During the course of cohstruction, it has become . necessary to direct the contractor to perform addi~ tional work which was qot cont~mplated in the plans and specifications. The Change Order appearing in the agenda authorizes an additional ~3 ,l 94 and 159 days time to accomplish the work. We hope to fina l ize this project in time for the April Board meeting. (d) Assig nm ent of Funds on Power Reliability Projec t at Plant No. 2 , J o b No . P2 -20 . The Contractor, Mel Gorham Electric , has experienced some financial difficulty in completing this project and it h a s become h e c es sary for his bonding company to assure that the Districts ' work will be completed as contracted; th e refore , the aµthorization to assign the funds due Mel Gorham Electric to the bonding company i s in order. -3- District No. 7 No. 36 Authorizing the Staff to Prepare Plans and Specifications for Repair of the Gisl·er· Trunk. Following the diversion of substantial flows from the Gisler Trunk to the newly-constructed Sunflower Interceptor system, our crews have discovered heavy infiltration of ground- water flows into the Gisler Trunk at one location. The staff recommends that plans and specifications for the repair work be prepared by District personnel for bidding purposes. The engineer's estimated ·project cost is $30 1 000. No. 37 -Annexation No . 35 -Fowler Annexation. The District's propo~ed annexation of 15 acres in the vicinity of Santiago Boulevard, Ryals Lane, and Avenida Palamar in the City of Orange has cleared the Local Agency Formation Com- mission. The standard Resolution appearing in the agenda orders the annexation in accordance with t he terms the District Board . established .. when the proceedings were initiated. The proponents have paid annexation fees totaling $6 ,4 94 . The property will be developed in accordance with the ~ensities propos~d in the Dis- trict's Master Plan. rt is recommended that standard Resolution No. 74-41~7 be approved. Di strict No . 11 \ No. 41 -Annexation No~ 17 -Bolsa Chica State Beach. Pursuant to the Board's direction, the staff has re- viewed the proposed annexation of 3 .. 55 acres of Bolsa Chica State Beach to the District .. It is our rec ommendation that the Board autnorize initiation of proceedings for· annexation. District No . 2 No. 46 Cont·ract· No. 2-14-1, Change Order No. 12 to Santa Ana: Rive·r · Tn't'erc·e p tor .. '. During the course of construction of the Santa Ana ~iver Interceptor, we received .notification from the Flood Control District that the rip-rap protection of the Orange Subtrunk has been washed a wa y fr om t h e crossing of the Santa An a River .. The District's cont ractor wa s directed to replace the rip-rap in order to protect the sewer from a wash-out because of winter rains. The amount of the Change Order is $7 ,995 .06. No. 47 -Claim Against the Dtstridt re: Contract No. 2-14-1. The District has receiv ed a property damage claim in the amount of $50 0 ,000 relative to the construction of Contract No. 2 -14~1. It i s the Ge n e r a l Counsel 's rec o mmendation that the cla i m be d en i e d a nd r efe rred t o the Di s trict 's contractor . -4- No. 49 -Annexation No. 9. The District's staff has reviewed a request on behalf of Grove rark Co n struction, Inc., to annex 7. 251 acres .(proposed Tra~t No. 83 9 9) to the District in the vicinity of Collins Avenue and Prospect in the City of Orange. The proponents expect to construct a 72-unit townhouse complex and a City of Orange sewer is accessible to the development. The proposed density is con- sistent with the surrounding properties and is compatible with the District's Master Plan in this particular case. It is there- fore recommended that the Boards authorize initiating proceedings for the annexation. · No. 53 -Adjourned Meeting. Chairman Ne vil has sugge_sted that the Board meet some-· time during the month of March to consider the Project Report and Environmental Impact Statement prepared for Reach 3 of the Santa Ana River Interceptor. The date and time of the adjourned. meeting wil~ be determined at the Joint Board meeting. · District No. 3 No. 54 -Ap p roving Alignment of the Knott Interceptor. We h a v e r e c e i ved communi ca ~i ons fr om the Cities o f We s tmin s ter a nd Bu e n a Park, a d v i s i ng tha t t h e i r Ci t y Counc ils have c onc urred wrt h the. proposed a lig nm e nt o f the Knott Inter- ceptor c on struct io n throug h their cities. The action appearing on the a genda i s t o re c e ive a nd fi~e t h ese l e tters o f c onc urrence. Nos. 55 a n d 56 -Com p letion o f Co nstruct ion of Contract No. 3-17 (K not t Intercept o r Se wer ). This $5.8 millio n pro ject i s n o w c ompl e t e . The p r o j e ct, which b e g a n in J u n e , 1 9 7 2 at the i n t e r section o f Broo khur st a nd Ellis i n Fo unta in Val l ey , invo lved the ins tallat io n o f a 9 6-inc h · ins ide di ame t e r concre t e pipe ·5 mil es to Ne wla nd a nd Bol s a in the ~est m i nster a r ea . C h~n ~e Order No . 3 , tot a l i n g $38 ,627 .3 3, re p res e nt s s everal it ems of wo rk whi c h a r e princ i pally r e l a t e d to a dditi on a l b edding r ock ma t e ria l, st r ee t wor k required in· lie u o f r i ghts of way a c qu i sition a nd c h anged co n d i t i o n s . Th e Change Orders fo r add it i o na l roc k a nd work require d t o tal $56 ,573 wh i ch is less than 1 % o f the ~r i g in a l co ntra ct pr i c e . Change Order No. 4 a d justs t h e eng i nee r's q u an tit ies t o the ac t ual amounts of material s installed in acco r dan ce wi th the p lans and spec i fications , and ·c h ange Or d er No . 5 g rant s a time e xt ens i on of 1 04 days to t h e contractor·. Reso lut i on No . 74-44 -3 accepts the contract as comp l ete and aut h o r izes the ex ec u t i o n of a Closeout Agreement a nd r e corda tio n o f a Notice of Comp l et i on of Work . · -5- No. 57 -Cl a im for Dama ges r e : Contract No . 3-18 . The Districts have received a damage claim totaling $100,000 re: Construction of Contract No. 3-18.' It is the General Counsel's recommendation that the claim be denied and referred to the contractor. No. 58 -Draft Environmental Impact Report on Contract No. 3-19. The motion appearing on the agenda ratifies the action of the staff in filing a Notice of Completion on the draft Environmental Impact Report for Contract eo. 3-19. It was necessary t6 file the Notice of Complet~on of the report to meet the time constraints relative to the filing of comments by the public agencies involved. Cont~act No. 3-19 will provide a 21-inch interceptor sewer in Imperial Highway beginning at Beach Boulevard in La Habra extending easterly 2 3/4 miles through the Cities of La Habra and Fullerton to 1300 feet east of Palm Street- in the City of Brea. .Total estimated project cost is $589 ,000 . We hope to award a construction contract · in June and complete construction by January, 1975. · FAH:j -6- Fred A. Harper General Manager Joint Chairman March 13, 19 74 Call on Director Don Smith, to introdu ce the new Directors from the City of Orange . ... Adopt a Resolution of Appre ciation for the s e r vic es of retiring Director Edward Just and Director Don Smith. Announce that the Water Pricing Committee meeting originally scheduled for 5:00 p.m., March 20th, has been cancelled . Call meeting o f the Executive Committee for 5:30 p .m. K~ Wednesday, Ma rch 20th. Invite Directors ~L~in (Br ea ), Temple rO range ) and Winn (Villa Park). March 13, 1974 TO: Joint Chairman Finnell RE: Agenda Item No. 4 -Seating new members of the Boards We have received excerpts from the following agencies regarding elections of mayors and appointments of alternates: AGENCY Brea DIST. 2 3 MAYOR *Leonard MacKain Leonard MacKain * Serving as Active Director ALTERNATE Donald Fox *Donald Fox •I -' BOA kt DS OF D mECTO ;?S Coun t y 'Sanita tion D ist ri cts Post Office Box 8 1 27 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Ca lif., 92708 Telephones: II (1) (2) ( 3) F LE ··-·············· LmrR ...... _ .... ( 4) A/C .-Tl<\.~ ~· (5) lETT£R --~- :~T~~ ~ ILF •... (~ l ER ·-~ A/C _ .• TKlR •.• -------- -"'-····--·--, JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE MARCH 13) 1974 7:30 P.M . Pled ge of Allegi ance and Invocation Ro ll Call Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AG ENDA ~DJDURflMllHS PflSTE D.V l.iOMP & "IL ,GE .... ~ .. . FILlS ~:T UP .. .v,'.'. ........... ; iE' • ".1:> vEl<flFIED.v ,_ffi[l\,} l/i{ TT ~ ..... ~• MINUTE~ ' T .!It V.: .. ~ MINUl E~ " LED .V:. ... - Co ns ideration of motion t o receive and file minute excerpts from the various ~ities regarding ~lections of mayors and appointments of alternates , and seating new members of the Boar ds ~, <\..-r . 'Q.. (~) ~"'-.+"!) EA Cti DISTRJ:C'l: Consideration of motion approving minut e s of the ·followi ng meetings, as mailed: M{/ Dist r ict 1 February 1 3 , 1 974 regular. (V1(5 District 2 February 1 3 ,.1974 regular f'Vl /5 District 3 February 13, 197~ r eguiar f'llf~ District 5 February 13, 19"( 4 re g ular Mls District 6 February 13, 197 l! r egular Febru ary 1 3, 197~ r egul ar , and F'ebru ary 26 , 1 974 adj o ur·n ed Ml~ District 7 M\? District 11 February 13, 19'( 4 regul ar ALL DIS TRICTS Report of t he Joint ALL DISTR I CTS Re port of the Gen e ral Mana g e r ALL DISTRICTS Report of tfi'e Gen e ral Coun se l (9) ~\'? (10) FILE --- LETTER -·--·- A/C _.TKLR •••• ---.... LETTER~ A/C • .:.. TKl.R r ) ~-k· \ 11 f\\~ •I-~ lETTER ···-:-0 A/C ,_TKLR -- ~~ ---(13) F!!!..-·········· - lmER ·:·-········ \\(\ l ~ A/C _TKLR ·-·I I \ l ALL DISTRIC TS Report of the Ex ecu tive Comm i ttee and consideration of motion t o r·eceive and file Comm i ttee 's wr itt en report AL L DI STRICTS Consid e r ation of action on items re commended by th e Executive Committee: (a) Report of Special Committee o n Feas~bility of Electronic Data Processing System ~ Report of Committee ~ Report of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., Consultant (3) (4) Cons idera tion of motion to r ece ive and file Report to th e Co u nty Sanitation Districts of Or ange Co unt y on a Data Pr ocess ing Feasibil i ty St udy and I mp lementation Plan, dated Feb ruary , 1974, submitted by Peat, Marwick , Mi tc he ll ~ Co~ Consid e ration of motion approving rec omm endations of Peat, Marwick , Mitch~ll & Co. and the Special· Committ ee on Feasibility of Electronic Da ta Pr ocessing System, and .authorizing impl em e n tation of said recommendations, as c oncurr ed in by the Executive Committee .. AL L DISTRICTS Cons i deration of motion authorizing the s ~aff to r equest proposal(s) for c onsult i ng services in connection with imp l ementation of Data Pr ocess ing Plan ALL DISTRICTS Report of Ge n eral Cou)lQ._el re "Conf;l.ict of Interest " legislation ~c..ra.U ~ ~-1 if-. 6.J. C\~1 ~.11) ~ ~-7£j _ 5 ~ ( '5,c.,<-7) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion approvin g amendmentg to the Districts ' Uniform Gu idelines Implementing the California Environme nt a l .Quality Act of 1970 , as amended , to conform with recent cha n ges · in State regulations , as r e commended by the Gene r a l \~r-/~L-_sel (ffi~ DISTRICTS lmER ---l' A/C -TKLR ··-N\ ) (15) Consideration of motion authorizing t he General Ma nage r to desi gnate one staff member to appear before the Joint Senate and House Committee on Science and Astronautics in \vash ington , D. C . , on or abo1.l.t March 21 , 197 4, to pre se nt the local. sewering agencies ' viewpoints on rea ct ivated carbon improved wastewater treatment process , as requested by Dr . Fletcher of NASA ; and authorizing reimbursement of trave l, meals , lodging and in c i dental expenses incurred ALL DISTRICTS Con s id eration o f Res olution No. 74-39 , requesting interpretation of the F e d e ral Water Pollution Contro l Act Amendments of 1 972 , a n d th e rul es and r eg ul atio ns :Lmplem enting said act , to allow any reve nue producing system (includin g a d valorem taxes) that accomp li s h es an equit a ble di s tribution of co s ts am ong ~sers to meet t h e r eq uiremen t s of the act , and a llow indus t r ial co s t r e cove ry from a ll industries wi th in th e applicant 's jur i sd ic tion ; a nd direc t in g co p ies of s ai d r esolution be forwarded to Orange Count y 's con gress i b n a l delegat i o n , members of the House a nd Senat e Public Work s Committees , a nd the Environme n ta l Pro tection . Age ncy . See page 11 A" -2 - ( 16) ·ALL DISTRICTS Environmental Impact Report for Improved Treatment at Fll.E ............ ,..... Plant No .. 2 ~ ...... Zr;:~ >Jc _TKLR _ ,. ( ~J. Staff review of draft Environmental Impact Report ~~PJ 'f (b) Consideratiori of motion to receive and file draft Environmental Impact Report for Improved Treatment Fll.E ----------·----· lmER --··· .. a.o A/C -1111 .... JtM v-- (c) at Plant No. 2, dated March, 1974, prepared by Richard Terry & Associates/En~ironmental Science & Services, with the assistance of the Districts' staff; directing the Jiling of Notice of Completion and Notice of Intent in accordance with the Local Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and establishing April 25, 1974, as the date for which all comments must be received on said Environmental Impact Report Consideration of motion fixing April 3, 1974, as the date for an infor~al public hearing on the draft Environmental Impact Report for Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, and authorizing the staff to conduct said hearing at the Districts' administrative offices (17) ALL DISTRICTS fiU: ................. . I.ETTER ............. . A/C -.TKLR ... . CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to ·be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent c&lendar. All items removed from the consent ·calendar shall be considered separately in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar sha~l, upon rec0gnition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar~ * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of riction to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3, to the plans and specifications for Additional Secondary Treatment at Reclamation Plant 1No. 1, Job No. Pl-9--1, authorizing an addition of $10,542.62 and granting an extension of time of 137 calendar days to the contract with James E. Hoagland & Hoagland Engineering, a Joint Venture. See page "B" (b) tandard Resolution No. 74-40, accepting Additional Secondary · ent at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-9-1, as comp~ nd authorizing execution of a Notice of_ Completion (CONSENT CALENDAR continuetl on page 4) -3- (17) (CON SEN T CALENDAR continued· from page 3) (c) fll! -·-··-···-·-·-· Con sid e ration of motion appro ving Ch a n g e Order No . 2, to the plans 2nd spccificat!ona f0r Increased ~dter Reuse Fa ciJitie s at Plant No. 2, Job No . J-4 -1 1 authorizing an addition of $3 ,194 .00 and gran ting $'JER ---··- A/C _TKLR ... -----an extension of time of 15 9 calendar days to .the contract with F . T . Ziebarth and Ziebart & Al per , a Joint Venture . See page "C" (d) FILE .......... '·"· ··- ~--_'.'.:~~ Consid eration of motion to receive, file and approve Assignme nt, dated ~;,;;..\ 'l1i./ , f r om Me l Gorham Electric Compan y , Contractor for P~wer Reliability Project at Plant No . 2 , Job ~o . P2 -20, to Indust~ia l Indemnity Company, bonding company fo~ ~aid project , of remaining funds due contractor on said job A/C _TKlll. - (18) ALL DIS TR ICTS FILE ··--··-··-·· (19) M~~ (20) Considerat ion of items deleted from consent calendar : Consideration of Resolut i on No .. 74 -40 , accepting Additional Secondary Tr.eatment a t Recl2.mation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-9 -1, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of comp l etion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement . See page ' "IV" ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to convene in executive session r e· ·personnel matters ~-. !$5 ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to r econvene in regular session 9:0 7 (21) ALL DISTRICTS (22 ) (2 3 ) Consideration of action on it ems cons i dered in e xec utive session ~ ~ .. Cit... 1'1 -.5 '-f t~N ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress rep ort on Treatment Plant Construction Projects . See · page "D" ALL DISTRICTS Consideratio n of motion to r eceive and file certification of the Gen eral Mana g er that he has checke d al l bills appearing on the agenda , found the m to be in order, and ·that he recommends authorization-for payment (24 ) ALL DISTRICTS (24) Consideration of r o ll cal l vote motion a pproving RDU cAU vore__.....,. Joint Oper a ting and Capital Outla y Revo l ving· Fund warrant books for si g n a ture of the Chairman of r;A )> District No . 1, and authcri z j _ng p a ym en t of cliam s I"\ lis t ed on pa.g e 11 I " --< if any and c_o~cations or supplement a l ag enda (26) DISTRIC TS 1 l 7 Cons iJe.!. atio11 of mot iort t:tpproving· :3U:3pe n :3e fu nd warrants> If any . See .:oupplementa l a g enda e.tte:ehment \2?) DISTRICT 1 (28 ) ( 29). Con:3iderat ion of mot i on approvi nz; i,mrrant o , if any . 8ee supplcmentel a g enda attachmen t ISTR I C'l' 1 ther bu si~ss a nd ~uni cat i ons i ms , if a n '\ ·. "'---. ,. o r supplemental agenda DISTRIC'11 1 () .. l 0 Con sid e r atio n o f motio n to ad journ 7 _}J_ ( 30) DI STRICT 5· ~~ (3 0) Consideration of mot i o n approv ing wa rrants . See page "II " (.31 ~ ~' _.ite s, if ~ic at i ons -~ s.upplemental agenda (32) DI STR I CT 5 ~\~ Considerati on of motion to adj ourn ~·.1 ° ( 33) DISTRT GT 6 (34) Co118idera:tion of motion a p proving uarrants 3 if any. £8~ supple fficntal agenda attaehffient busi ness a~~mmu nic ~r supp lemental a g enda items, if any (35) 'DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn °I : \D .fl l.E -·-······Y.3 6 ) -=~~~:~·o.-. Ml? DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion authorizing and directing the staff to pre pare plans and specifications f or Repairs to Gis l er Trunk (Infiltration Redu·ction)_, Contract No . 7-1-R ,_ _:. ..... (37) FILE \ C.......· A4-~\ol. TKL R: - I . DISTR IC T 7 Co nsideration o~ Standard Resolution No . 74 -41-7, o rdering annexa tio n of approximate l y 15 ac res to the District in -the vi~inity of Santiago Boulevard , Ryals La ne and Aven i da Palama r i n the City of Or a nge (Proposed Annexati o n No. 35 - Tract No . 8 235 to County Sani tat i on Distiict No . 7 ) .,( · .. ( 38) DI STRICT 7 (38) Consideration of motion approving warrants . See page "III " . ( 39) DISTRICT 7 (40) (41) Other business and communications or supplemental agenda it ems , -if any ~ y 1 Lf "~ (~) . DI STR I CT 7 Conside ration of mot;_oq. to adjourn q._ \'V' ... DI STRICT 11 . Conside r a tion of St a ndard Res o lution No . 74 -4 2 -11 aut h orizing i nitia t ion of pro c ee ain gs to a nnex a p pr o xima tely 3 .55 acres of territ o r y t o the Di str ict in t he v i cini ty of War n e r Av e nue and P a cific Coast Hi ghway Al terna te (Pr op osed Ann e x at ion No . 17 -Bals a Chic a S t a te Beach Annex a tion to Co unty Sanitation District No. 11) (4 2 ) DISTRIC TS 3 & 11 (Vl.\7 (42) Consider atio n of mo ti on appro vin g suspense fund \'\'\\) wa rrants . See page "II " (4 3 ) DIST EI CT 11 {\I\';; ( 4 3) Cons i der~tion of mot i on approving warrants . See page "III " (44) D STR IC T 11~ · .. O er bu s in e s~ c ommun~s or sup p l e me n tal age n da . it e , if any -5- ... (46) 1;.... -··-····· :r _____ .. __ (47) - (4 8) . Fllf ·--·-··- LETTER --- . A/_C -~LR .iJI\ I l ~.DLi' < • l I I ~ ~}~ (49) f'. -.·-l Ve... A/C ~~Kl;-M \5 ( 50·) r.E ·······- lETTER ...... ,wM-/\n \ s .A/C _.TKlR -f H ~ DISTRICT 11 Consid ~I'at .ion of mot i on to adjo~rn q~ fJ DISTRICT 2 Consid e rati o n of motion approving Change Order No . 12, t o the plans and s pecifications for Santa Ana River · Int erc e ptor f r om Re c l am ati o n Plant No . 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No . 2-1 4-1 , author izing an addition of $7,9 95.06 to the cont ract with Sully -Mill er Contracting Company . See page "E" DISTRICT 2 Consideration o f motion to receive and file Cla i m for Pers onal Injuries submitted by Henry Stone and Jerry But ler i n the amount of $500,000 in connection with construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptoi from Recla~ation P l ant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-1 4-1, and rejecting said claim on the basis that it is an i mproperly prepared claim and is defective as· to form in that ther e is no entity entitled "Sanitation District of Orange County", as recommended by the General Counsel · DISTRI CT 2 Consi deration of Standard Reso lu tion No. 74 -43 -2, a~thorizing accept ance of Grant of-Easement from Orange County Water District fo r a permanent easement i n connection wi th construction of the Santa Ana Rive r Int erceptor from Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contrac t ~o. 2 -14-2~ at no cost to th e Di strict · DI STRICT 2 ~~ Consideration of Standard Resolution No . 74 -~2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to anne x approximately 7 .251 acres o f territory to the District in the vicinity of Prospect Av enue and Coilins Avenue in th e Ci ty of Orange (Proposed Annexation ·No . ·9 -Tract No. 8399 to C~unty Sanitation Dis trict No. 2) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to r eceive and file staff pr ogres s r eport o n constructi6n of the · Santa Ana Riv~r Interceptor f~om Reclamation Plant No . 1 to Katella Av~nue , Contract No. 2-1 4-1 , and the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue , Contract No . 2-14 -2. See page "F" (51) DISTRICT 2 (51 ) Conside r ation of mot i on approv i rig warrants . See page "II" ~--..J--·D~STRICT 2 IJ..A\ c:;v-:. Other bu s ines s and communications o r supplem ental agenda ~ items , if any r 1\1.\~ 0..1·''· '"'L... _,, -r-~· (53) r.tE ········· tfTT~ .. ( 5 4) A/C _ntlR DI STRICT 2 Consideration of mo tion to adjo.urn tc:i J4a-rctr ~ 3 (Date to be det e rmined by Board) q ~11 DI STRICT 3 Con s i de r a tio n of m o t ~on to receive and fil e minute ex cer p t from t he Cit y of Bu e n a Park, da t e d Fe br uary 19, 1974, a n d letter from the Ci t y of We stminster , d a t e d Feb ru a ry 2 7 , 1974, approving ali g nment of the Knott Interceptor , Reaches 5 , 6 , 7 and 8, Contra ct No. 3-2 ( -6- File --- UYrf'tl ------- A/C _JKLR -··- (57) ---(58) -·---- ETIER _____ { 59) A/C __ .TKLR -l ' .----M 7 ·-- DI S'l'H I CT .3 (a) Con s id e ratio n of motion ap provi ng Ch a n g e Order No. 3, (b) (c) -to the pla~s a~j ~~ccifi cat i on s for the Knott Int erceptor , a Portion of Hea ch 1 and Reaches 2 & 3, Contra ct No. 3-17, authorizing an addition of $38,627.33 to the contract with . J. F . Shea Company. See page "G" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4~ to the plans and specifications for the Knott Interc eptor, a Portion of Reach J. and Reaches 2 & 3, Contract No. 3-17, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities to the cont~act with J. F. Shea · Company. See page "H" · Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5, to the plans and specifications for the Knott Iriterceptor, a Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 & 3, Contract No . 3 -17, grariting an extension of time of 104 calendar days to the contract with J. F. Shea Company. See pa.ge "I 11 DISTRICT 3 Consideration of Resolution No . 74-44-3, accepting the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 & 3, Contract No. 3 -1 7, as complete; authorizing execution of a .Notice of Co.i:np ..Le . .t.i.OJ:l upon _rec_eipt of letters of compliance from agencies issuing permit.$ in · connection-wi.th -said contract ; and approving ~inal Closeout Agreement . See page 11 J" DISTRICT 3 Considera tion of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Kenneth C. Young, dated February 25, 197 4 , ~n the amount of $100,000 in connection with construction of the · Knott I.ntercept or , Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18, as recommended by the General Counsel DISTRICT 3 -Consid eration of motion to receiv:e and file draft Environmental · I mpac t Report for Imp erial Relief Interceptor Sewer, Reaches 22 and 23 (mailed to Chairman and Directors of affected cities with February agenda ma terial); and ratifying action of staff in fili ng of Notice of Completion in accordance with the Local Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 , as amended; and e~tablishing March 20 , 1974~ as the date for which all comments must be rec eived on said Enviro lli~ental Impact Report DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff p ro gress report on c o nstruction o f the Knott Interceptor , Reach 4, Con.tract No . 3-18. See page 11 K" ( 60) DISTRIC'l1 3 (60) Conside r at ion of motion approving warrants. See page "IIn (( 61)\ DISTRICT 3 ~ Other business and communicatio'ns or supp lementa l agenda it ems , if any f~ ,....,_ ~ _,; (62) DISTRIC T 3 Considera tion of motion to adjourn 9 :.;i l ~- -7-· RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS March 13, 1974 -7:30 P.M. -~ RESOLUTION NO. 74-39 REQUESTING INTERPRETATION OF FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CON'l'ROL AC'r AMENDMENTS OF 19 7 2 TO ALLOH AD VALOHEM '"l1AXES IN REVENUE SYSTEMS AND INDUS 1rRIAL COS'"l1 RECOVERY FROM ALL INDUS':rRIES WITHIN AN AGENCY'S JURISDICTION A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 1, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING INTERPRETATION OF THE FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT AMENDMENTS OF 1972, AND THE RULES AND REGULATIONS IMPLEMENTING SAID ACT, TO ALLOW ANY REVENUE PRODUCING SYSTEM (INCLUDING AD VALOREM TAXES) THAT ACCOMPLISHES AN EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION OF COSTS AMONG USERS TO ~IBET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACT, AND INDUSTRIAL COST RECOVERY FROM :ALL INDUSTRIES WITHIN THE APPLICANT'S JURISDICTION * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, Section 204 of the Federal Water Pol!ution Control Act Amendments of 1972 provides, in part, as follows: and, " ... (b)(1) Notwithsta~ding any other provision of this title, the Administrator shall not approve any grant for any treatment works under section 201(g)(l) after March 1, 19?3, unless he shall first have dete·rmined that the applicant (A) has adopted or wiZl adopt' a system of charges to assure that ~ach recipient of waste treatment services within the applicant's jurisdiction, as determined by the Administrator,·will pay its proportionate share of the costs of operation and maintenance (including replacement) of any waste treatment services provided by the appl~cant: (B) has made provisio~ for the payment to such applicant by the industrial users of the treatment works, of that portion of the_ cost of construction of such treatment works (as determined by the Administrator) which is allocable to the treatment of such industrial wastes to the extent attributable to the Federal share of the cost of construction ... " WHEREAS, the rul~s and regulations of the Environmental Protection Agency implementing the Act provide that ad valorem taxes may not be used as a source of revenue to meet said user charge provision of the Act; and, WHEREAS, it has been further interpreted that the industrial cost recovery provision of the Act requires that the portion of the cost of construction of treatment works allocable to industrial wa0tes AGENDA ITEM #15 A-1 ALL DISTRICTS be recovered only from those industries served by the individual project rather than from all industries within the applicant's jurisdiction; and, WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, presently serving a population of 1,500,000 in more than twenty-four communities, have·heretofore demonstrated their ability to finance their activities and distribute costs of said activities equitably among their users, resulting in an efficient and cost-effective program of wastewater quality control in Orange County; and·, WHEREAS, said pr1ogram of wastewater q.uali ty control has heretofore been, for the most part, supported for capital improvements and expansion and operation and maintenance. of sewerage facilities by ad valorem taxes; and, WHEREAS, implementation of a direct user charge by th_e County Sanitation Districts of Orange County would involve a system of charges for over 400,000 ~onnections, would not be cost effective, and would significantly add to the Districts' operating costs by· as much as 25%, thus placing an additional burden on all users; and, WHEREAS, recovery of costs from industry. attributable to the portion of the construction of treatment works allocable to industrial wastes from those individual industries. tributary to a specifically · t~nded project, would result in ari inequitable distribution of said costs among users and, further," result in an unfair economic advantage or disadvantage among certain industrial dischargers; and, WHEREAS, these Joint. Boards of Directors have heretofore declare.d their intent to adopt a revenue probram for :t:inancing of Districts' activities which envisions use of ad valorem tax as a component of said revenue program and which said revenue program will demonstrate the Districts' ability to f~nd operation and maintenance of facilities; demonstrate the Districts' ability to finance the ~ replacement and expansicn of facilities as needed; demonstrate that the industrial community will pay its proportionate share of Districts' AGENDA ITEM #15 A-2 ALL DISTRICTS costs and will adopt ;nctustrial waste discharge rules and regulat~ons which co~ply with applicable state and federal regulations; and demon- strate that Districts' costs are equitably distributed among users; and~ WHEREAS, the Districts propose to accomplish the above in accordance with the Water Pollution Control Act's stated objective of minimizing procedures and paperwork and interagency decisions and procedures and the best· utilization of available manpower and funds. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE: That the Joint County Sanitation Districts of Orange County hereby request that interpretation of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act amendments of 1972, and the rules and regulations implementing said Act, allow any revenue-producing system (including . . ad valorem taxes) that accomplishes an equitable distribution of costs to the users of an applicant's system; and, Allow allocation of industrial cost recovery for industry's proportionate share of the cost· of construction of treatment works among all industries within an applicant's Jurisdiction; and, · That the above be deemed as meeting the require-· rnents of said Act for eligibility for federal construction grant f\l.nding of applicant's project. · AGENDA ITEM #15 A-3 ALL DISTRICTS cou;ny SA:nT,\THr~ DISTI~IC.TS or: 0!'..;\~:r.r: cou::tY P • 0 • Box 3 1 2 7 - 1 0 d · l · l E 11 i s , \ v (•nu c Fountain Valley, California 92708 CIIA:~GE 01U>~R c. 0. :\0. 3 . James E. Hoagland Co. and Hoagland ~~~~~~~~~~-co:rrr"ACTOR: EnQ ine er ing Co. , A .Joint Ven tu re DATE ~!arch 13, 197 ~ JOB: Additional Secondary Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-9-1 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (Ill!!ICil\'X) $ __ 1 o__,, __ s_4_2 _. 6_2_ •· In accordance with contract provisions, the followin~ changes in the--- contract and/or contract work arc hereby authorized and as cor.lpensation therefor, the following additions· to or 1 tlc<luctions from the contract price are hereby approvcJ.. • .. Reference: Contractor's Correspondence Dated June 1, 1973 (May 30, 1973 & April 4, 1973"), August 9, 1973 & February 28, 1974. ·"RECAP" of February 28, 1974, Change items 3A through 3Y inclusive . . , . Districts Correspondence July 17~ 1973, July 24, 1973, August 15, 1973, September 7, 1973 and December 17, 1973 , . Drawings A-7 <Rev. 2), A-14, A-12, A-1, A-10 Add: In$tall n~w flexible screenings conveyor rollers • Install additional plant water system connection and revise pipi~g Repla~e lever op~raied valve with gear operated unit Modify existing plant water pump to allow installation in new pump .station Provide additional paving and con-:.rete ·slabs at incinerators, chlorinators, trtckling filters, and hydraulic gate operation p~mps Rework incinerator cpntrols Remove unsuitable foundation material under the provision of Proposal Item A as directed by the engineer . . Provide and install steel pipe adaption.at distribution.structure Install new Type 316 stainless steel bolts in disc water screen Relocate sluice gate at plant.water pump station Furnish and install·health department approved air gap at the Fountain Valley City Water service Install baffle in screenings hopper •• ADD ADD ·ADD ADD ADD ADD ADD ADD ADD ADD ADD ADD 2,288.00 484.~ .312 .. 74 879.59. 1,317.33 9&.70 127.50 l,°IS4.95 276.00 1,086.:' ~ 1,161.86 139.84 AGENDA ITEM #17(a) B-1 ALL DISTRICTS COUNTY SA:HTATIO!~ DISTRICTS .Of ORAt~GE comn.Y P. O. Box 31Z7 -108~4-Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CllANGE OIU>ER James E. Hoagland Co. nnd Hn~~land · CO~T~CTOI~=~E~n~z~~n~e_e_r_i~n~~~c~o~,~1~I~o~i-n~t~'~·c~n~t~;~1r~o~~~ C. 0. NO. 3 DATE --~-ta_r_c_h--1-3-, -l -l l-~-.+-- JOB: Additional Secondary Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-9-1 A-.. ,: • (Continued) Modify trickling filter backwash slide gate to conform to existing conditio~ Modify hydraulic system at incinerator.rams Modify existing conveyor system to accept new ram tables ADD ADD ADD. 163.59 SSS.OD 497.06 TOTAL ADD $ 1 0 ,.s 4 2 ·• 6 2 . Extension of Contract Time As a reiult of the above additional work and due to operational requirements, the Contractor is hereby granted an extension of contract time of 137 calendar davs • TOTAL EXTENSIO.N OF CONTRACT TIME 137 calendar davs . "-"' Summary of Contract Time Original Contract Date Original Contract Completion Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this Change Order Total Extension of Contract Time Revised Contract Completion Time Revised.Contract Completion Date l>o--~d authorization date: ., March 13, 1974 By ------~~------c~o-n_s_u_l~t~i-1-1g--.E-·n_g_i_1-~e~e-r By --------------~-----------------~-Contractor AGENDA ITEM #17(a) Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes October 26, 1972 300 calendar days August 22, 1973 137 calendar days 197 ~alendar days 497 calendar days March 7, 1974 $ 28,943.39 This Change (ADD) (D~"'"Of) $ 10, 542. 62 Amended Contract Price s 825,786.01 B-2 Approved: ·COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By ______ ~-------~--~~--~-:----~-Clu et Lnr,1nc:.:.! ... ALL DISTRIC1 1S l.UU&\l l ~,\:H !'Ar IO>~ lJISTl~lCTS OF O!'"\::GE cou:ffY P. o. Box 8127 -10'1-l·l Ellis. ,\v~nue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE OIU>ER F. T. Ziebarth and Ziebarth & Alper ;\ .Tni.nt Vent11re C. 0. i\O. 2 :o:rrrJ\CTOR: DATE --~--.f-a_r_c_h __ l~~~-J-9_7_4----~ IOB: Increased Water Reuse Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No .. I-4-1 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (~1}ml~i) $ -------3,194.00 • In accordance with contract provisions, ·the following changes in the~ :ontract antl/or contract h'ork arc hereby authorized and as conpensation :hcrcfor, the following additions ·to or deductions from the ~ontract price are lercby approvc<l. • .. . . Reference: Contractor's Correspondence Dated. March 4, 1974 · Add: Change material of screen assembly bolts to stainless.steel Furnish new 600 amp circuit breaker for G.E. motor control center Revise motor mount.on new line bottom screw feeder to fit existing hopper Install new ~upports at shaker screens and modify mounting beams to ~rovide clearance for new screenings conveyor. Provide·new incinerator flame control system for existing incinerators in accordance with·applicable safety·regulations Construct masonry closures at openings in Plant Water Pump Station·building to provide greater weather tightness ADD · ADQ ADD ADD ADD ADD TOTAL ADD Extension of Contract Time: Due to operational requirements and in order to perform the above additional work the contractor is hereby granted an· extension of contract time of TOTAL TIME EXTENSION C-1 109.00 1,o:n.00 129.00 175.00 _1, 60 0. 00 150,00 $ 3,194.00 159 calendar days 159 calendar davs COU!ffY SA:JIT,\TIO:~ DISTI~ICTS OF OR.M\GE cou~:TY P.O. Box 3127 -108~4 Ellis.Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER c.o. KO. 2 F. T. ~iebatth and ZiPh~rth ~ ~lper CO:~T RAC TO I\: _...,.\_.._ro_j n~t-\.._r n_..r..._, • ...... « 1.._1 ri...ic.__ _________ _ DATE .\brc h I.) ' : :) ' ::t JOB: Increased Water Reuse Facilities at Plant Na 2, Toh No T-4 -1 Summary of Contract Time: Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension This Change Order Total rime Extension October-26, 1972 300 calendar days August 22, 1973 159 calendar days. 21~ calendar days 519 calendar days March 29, 1974 Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date .· • ~ - Ho ··d authori za ti on date: ...,,,., March 13, 1974 By ----------------..C-o_n_s_u~l-t_i_n_g __ E_n_g_1_n_c_c_r By ------------------------------~----Contractor AGENDA ITEM #17(c) Original Contract Price $ 611,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes ·$ 13,643.47 This Change (ADD) (~~~N~4) $ -------3,194.00 Amended.Contract Price s 627,837.47 C-2 Approved: COU~TY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By --~--------------------,c-1-11~c-f~·~[~:1-10-1~·n-c-c~,r L• ALL DISTRIC'l'S. • PROGRESS REPORT TREATMENT PLA~'T PROJECTS P2-11-l -HEADWORKS "C" EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2 -($1, 261, 693) NEW MAIN SEWAGE PUMPS: Operational. NEW BAR SCREENS: Operational. NEW GRIT CHAMBERS: . Operational. NEW GRIT WASHER: Operational. NEW METER VAULT: Operational. FOUL AIR SCRUBBER: Operational. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFOR'~IA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVE!':L'£ FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFOR!\.:A 9::'.~03 (714) 54')-2910 (71""1 962-241 I REHABILITATION OF HEADWORKS "B": Deteriorated concrete has been removed and surface gunited. PVC lining is being installed. Contract approximately 98 percent' complete to date. I-8-3 -INFLUENT METERING ~\ID DIVERSION STRUCTURE ($1, 485, 679) INFLUENT CHANNEL: Complete. INFLUENT PIPING: Euclid and Sunflower Trunk bypasses in service. Completed junction· structur~s on .Newhope-Placentia and District No. 1 trunk lines. Interplant Influent Intercepror, Ellis Force Main, Newhope-Placentia, and Sunflower Trunks have been connect~d to structure. METERING AND DIVERSION STRUCTURE: Underground structure complete. Backfilling area. Installing equipment. Erected wall panels for control building. Installing meters. Contract approximately 79 percent complete to date. P2-20 -POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT PLAi"IT NO. 2 -(158,294) No further onsite work is expected until sufficient equipment has been delivered to complete peripheral lighting and control installations. Contract approximately 58 percent complete to date. AGEIJDA ITEM #22 D-1 ALL DisrrRICTS Progress Report Treatment Plant Projects Page Two COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS A\~·.:,!.: FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CAL1;::;·~~;1A 9~:'~~ (7: .q ~ .11.: i; ~ (71Jl 96:-2.tl I Pl-9-1 -ADDITIONAL SECONDARY TREATMENT AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 -($814, 943) DIGESTER GAS COMPRESSOR: Operational. NEW INCINERATOR, CONVEYOR AND RAMS: Operational. PLANT WATER PUMP STATION: Operational. TRICKLING FILTER: Operational. CITY WELL WATER PUMP STATION: · Operational. NEW WELL: Operable. Contract work complete. P2-21 -DIGESTERS ''N" AND "0" AT PLANT NO. 2 ..:. ($1,076,514) ....,. DIGESTERS "N" AND "0": Installing piping and equipment on digesters. Filling digesters in.preparation for testing. DIGESTER CONTROL BUILDING: Installing p~ping, electrical switchgear and sludge recirculation pumps and heat exchangers. TUNNELS: Installing piping. DIGESTER GAS COMPRESSORS: Completing installation. STORM WATER PUMP STATION: Structurally complete. Waiting for pumps. PAVING: Rough grading for paving. Contract approximately 79 percent complete to date. J-13 -SHOPS AND WAREHOUSE FACILITIES -($1,061,989) SHOP A: Installing plumbing and electrical. Installed bridge cranes. Installing mechanical equipment.· SHOP B: Installing plumbing and electrical. Installed-bridge cranes. Installing mechanical equipment. Texturing walls. WAREHOUSE: Installing heating. Installing plumbing and electrical. SITE: Rough grading. Curbs and gutters completed. Paving scheduled shortly. Contract approximately 69 percent complete to date. AGENDA ITEM #22 D-2 ALL DISTRICTS ' Progress Report Treat~~nt Plant Projects Page Three COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENI_:: FOUNTAIN VALlEY, CALIFORNIA 927'-" (714) 540-29 i 0 (714) 961-241 1 J-4-1 -· INCREASED WATER REUSE FACILITIES AT PLANT t\O. 2 -($624, 643) CITY WATER PmtP STATION: Operational. CHLORINE WATER PUMP STATION: Operational. PLANT WATER PUMP STATION: Completing electrical and mechanical work •. Ready to test. CHECK VALVES AT ROTHROCK PUMP STATION: Operationa1. SHAKER SCREENINGS CONVEYOR AND HOPPER: Operational. INCINERATOR CONTROL SYSTEM: Installing new flame control system. Contract approximately 99 percent complete. TREATMENT P LA!'IT-.·WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During February Total Work Out for Bid Total Work Under Design DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK To·tal Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During February Total Work Under Design March 7; 1974 AGENDA ITEM #22 $ 6,514,650 5,509,267 . 357,742 26,250,000 800,000 $21, 975' 119 14,058,250 744' 135 21,281,200 TOTJ\L AMOUNT UNDER CONI'RACT & DESIGN D-3 $ 6,514,650 26, 250 ,_ooo 800,000 $21,975,119 21,281,200 $76,820,969 ALL DISTRICTS '-" l..UUn l I .:>.:\.• l 11\ l 1 u.-. JJ l .:> 11 ... J \. l;, \.11· v;·_,\ •• u1~ ~uv.,,' P • 0 • Bo x 8 1 2_7 -1 0 0 -1 • l L 11 i :; , \ v e u u c Fount~ in Va 11 c y , Ca 1 i for n i a ~l 2 7 0 8 CllA~GE OIWER c. o. ;.;o. 12 ~---------~~---~--~-o: t fl V\ CT O~: SULLY-MILLER CO~TRACTINr, CO:-~Pl\:\Y DATE March 13, 1974 OB •• Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation .Plant ~o. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No 2-14-1 Amount of this Ch:ingc Order (Al.JD) (NlOm£~ $ ___ 7 ....... .....,9 9.......,5_..... ___ 0 ___ 6 t . . ~ In accordance with c?ntract pr?visions,_thc following change~ in the ontract an<l/or contract worK arc hercny authorized antl as conpcnsat1on hcrcfor, the following a<lditions to or dc<luctions frora t11c contract price arc ercby approvcu. • .. Upon notification of the Dist~ict by the Orange County ~load Control District, it was found that the rip-rap P.rotection of the Orange Subtrunk had been washed away from its. crossing of the· Santa Ana River. The contractor was directed to replace this rip-rap in order to protect this seweF from wash out. .· ADD TOTAL ADD .. Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes $ 1, g g 5. o·~- 7, 995. 06 $ 6,274,608.40 -------- $ 1,540,579~26 ------------------- This Change (ADD)(NXmNEI) $ 7,995.06 ------------------- Board authorization date: March 13, 1974 By __________ .-..----------~---r~....---~ Consulting Engineer By ____________________ __,,~~~~~ Contractor AGENDA ITEM #46 Amended Contra~t Price 7, 823, 182. 72 ..!E- · App:rovctl: COU!~'tY SANITATION nI STRICTS of Oz:~nge County, California By_·-----------------------------------.---Cluc1 tn~~ in cc DISTRICT 2 .. --~------ M E M 0 R A N D U r.t March 7, 1974 TO: Fred A. Harper, General M~nager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVE!'.\JE FOUNT.<\IN VALi f:Y Cl\.L!''_"·l!A 9~.' (714) 54J-2910 '--" (714) 962-24 I l SUBJECT: Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contracts Nos. 2-14-1 & 2-14-2 2-14-1 Completed work on this project extends from Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue with the exception of 1,000 feet of pipe south of Harbor Boulevard. A short delay in ·construction was encountered when the owner of Tally-Ho Stables refused to clear the right-of-way. The problem was worked out without serious consequence. The remaining pipe to be laid on.this contract will be completed by ~arch 15th, including the open cutting ·of Warner Avenue. 2-14-2 Preparation for pipe delivery and construction .has begun 2,000 feet north of Lincoln Avenue. Excavation for pire iaying will·begin March 11th. Construction of the pilot tunnel under Glassel Avenue is ne~rly complete. Excavation for the tunnel crossing at the Riverside Freeway is now underway. Due to the construction of an industrial complex on Grove Street between La Palma and the Riverside Freeway after this project was designed and its very close proximity to the construction area, the contractor proposed that the section of trunk sewer from just south of·the freeway to La Palma be realigned to the west to avoid this area. The land to the west of this industrial area is vacant and for sale. A developer made an offer for this land and had a plot plan showing the location of future streets. One of these streets would have acconunodated the sewer very wel,1 and the developer was willing to let the Contractor construct the sewer in this area in exchange for constructing the street which would ultimately be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. The offer the developer made to the owner of.the property was turned down. If the developers offer had been accepted, and the sewer relocated to this area,·there would have been a considerable savings to the District in that the Contractor's construction costs would have been reduced and part of this saving would have been passed on to the District. As it stands now, the Grove Street alignment will be used. REL:BEW:ss AGENDA ITEM #50 -F-DISTRICT 2 ()t. z t-z ·., <1 ti _. t CL l 1 l @ • •I ' • • 1 .. '· 1 1? c 8 ..... .F. Lf6EN O -.. _ .. L;N O Or= -·""'"""' 0 PIZOJ1.'l'.:-T -~~C~O~N~1~~~A~C~T~~~~~-~14~-~1~~~5~A~N~T~A~A~N=A~K=N=f=R~!N=1=E=~=~=f=F=T=O=&~~~·m~m u m u m ~•~~~ ~ 5AN1A AN~~l ~f~ l ~~RCfP~R M lL ~soi= 84''f l P~: 8 1p.z ----coupLi=1 r=-CoNTtZAC1 AWD.'Z.Of:O : 0)-~-/'Z 1v.1 1. 1. COST:$C:01 "Z74 1<&>0 & ••••• TO Be=-CON5T~UC1e:D <OCHe'"OJ L.e'"O 1=oR CDM Pl.fTION : <D-Vi?-74 . ...:.. I L f6e'"N D CoM Pt..!: if ••••• 1'0 e~ CONS1~uc:Tro cuu:rrY S:\~: TT.\T 1 :·:: !l 1 STi: I crs r~F o~:.\~:.~r: cou:;ry P • U • to x ~:>l :: 7 - l U ,") · t • i L 11 i s . \ \. (• 11 u c Fount'ain \'all<.!y, Caliior11ia·~2708 . c. 0. :-:o. 3 :o;~'fl.~.ACTOi~: J. F .. Sn ea Comp 3 ny, Inc . DATE ___,,~~1~-r-c~h~b~.-,--1-9~7-4~--~ JOB: Knott Interceptor, A Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 & 3, Contract ~o. 3-17 Amount of this Ch:ingc Order (ADD) (NXNMEY) . $ 38, 6 ~ 7. 3 3 ~ In accordance .with contr:ict provisions, the following changes in the :ontract r?.nd/or contract ,;ork arc hereby authoriz.c<l and as conpcnsation ~hcrcfor, the following additions to or dclluctions fror.i the c.ontract price are nercby apprpvcJ. :· . . Add: The Contractor was directed.to place one additional foot of rock from Stations ·1"87+20 to. 190+29 and ·two additional feet of rock from Station 190+29 to 192+65 and from 238+37 to 240+10 64 6 c. y. @ $ 7. 5 0 ·34 9 C. Y·. @ $ 9. Q 0 .· $4,845.00 3,141.00 Additional work required· in lieu of acquisition of right-of-way, street improvements south side of Ellis Avenue, retaining wall and other related work Removal. and replacement· of·traffic signals and appurtenant work installed after award of contract Additional paving required in the Cities of Huntington Beach, Westmi~ster and Fountain Valley resulting from changed contract conditions and Utility adjustments ·Modifications required for the cqnnection of Contracts Nos. 3-18 and 3-17-1 at the north terminus of the project Removal of bulkhead installed on Contract.No. I-8, Interplant Inf lue~t. Interceptor AGENDA ITEM #55(a) G-1 ADD : 7,986.00 ADD 3,428.00 "ADD 2 '8·37. 6 9 ADD . 12,796.99 ADD 3,809.35 ADD· 1,840.00 DISTRICT 3 cou:~TY ~;\:;r~.\TI:::~ in~;·~::1c1·~~ or o:~~\\.;i. crn::TY P. O. Lox ~)1~7 -10:~-l·l Lllis .• \\'Pn11e Fountaill \'alley, Calituntla ~~.:i~00 c.o. ;.:o. 3 CO•~Tr-v\CTO~; J. F. Shea Comp~ny, Inc. DATE· -----------March 6, 197J JOB: Knott Interceptor, A Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 & 3,·contract No. 3-17 • Add: (Continued) Utility adjustments, raised manholes to grade, Kater · valves, cover replacement, existing manhole ring and cover on Miller-Holder Trunk Hoard authorization date: March 13, 1974 • By --------------~c-o_n_s_u_l~t-1-1-1g--E~~r-1b-,1-n_e_c_r By ________________________ ~~------ C on tractor · AGENDA ITEM #55(a) ADD TOTAL ADD • Original Contract Price PreV. Auth. Changes 5,929.30 $ 38,627.33 $ 5,755,480.00 $ ______ 7~,_2_2_8_.3_7 ____ _ This Change (ADD) (XJ.'00\tOlX) $ __ 3_8 ..;....' 6_2_7_._3_3 __ Amen<led Contract Price s 5,801,335.70 G-2 Approved: COUNTY S:\NITATION DISTRICTS of ~ Orange County, California DISTRICT 3 '--VU n .& I v.: \. t l 1 I\ 1 l \. J... J J .l :> 1 I~ J l. J ~ l I 1 • U ! '.J \. , \JI: ~ U U,, l I . p • 0 • I~ 0 x 3 1 : 7 - 1 (J 0 . ; I l I : 1 1 i ~ '\ v (' I l iJ c Fount~ in Va 11 c y , C .:i l i f o rri i a ~J 2 7 0 8 c. 0. 1\0. 4 :o:\TfL'\CTOil: J. F. SHEA CO., INC. DATE -..... f."P""fa_r__,ch-6--.~19~7""""'4.---- roll: Knotc Interceptor, A Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 & 3, Contract No. 3-17 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) ~~J:OU~r.9 $ 10,718.00 . . In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the :on'?'fact an<l/or contract h'ork arc hcrchy authorized and as conpcnsation :hcrefor, the following additions to or deductions from tl1c contract pric~ arc iercby approved. . .. ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES ADD: ... Item Change Est'd Quantities No. Unit From To 6 L.F. 670 761 11 L.F. 188 334. 21 V.F. 156 217. 22 V.F. 32 67 32 C.Y. 50 86 .DEDUCt: 2 L.F. 10,510 10,502 . ..._, 8 L.F. 306 298 30 Each 3 0 ,. Hoard authorization date: March 13, 1974 3y----------------..----r------..---------C ons u It 1 ng Engineer 3y ______________________ ~----~--- C on tractor AGENnA ITEM #55(b) Diff~rence 91 @ 30.00/L . .F. . 2, 730.00 146 @ 20.00/L.F. 2,920.00 " 61 @ 80.00/V.F. 4,880.00 ·--· ~5 @ 100.00/V.F. 3,soo.oo: 36 @ 40.00/~.Y. 1,440.00 Total Adq: 15,470.00 8 @ 194.00/L.F. 1,552.00 ·8 @ 25.00/L~F. .. 200.00 3· @.1000.00/Each 3,000.00 Total Deduct: 4,752.00 TOfAL ADD: 10,718.00 Original Contract Price $ 5, 755,480.00 Prev. Auth. Chan~cs $ 45, 855. 70 ------ 10, 718. 00 This Change (ADD) ~'IUiil'Ot!l~ $ ~----~~~----~ Amended Contract Price s 5,812,053. 70 ·-H- Approved: COUNTY SANITATIOl~ DISTRICTS of Or?,:ngc County, California By---------------------....-.----------~ ·Clnc1 LJ1C1 lnccr· ~' DISTRICT 3 cou:;TY S:\~lIT,\T Io:~ DI STI~ I Cf$ or· O!~\::r.r CPY~:J_Y .. P. O. Box Sl::7 -ltJ,.;.;.J Elli:_; .\vc-nuc fountain Valley, California ~J:708 CllA:\GE Ol:l>l.R c. 0. :.:o. 5 :o:~rr"ACTorr: J. F. SHEA co. , INC. ------~~~~~--~-DATE March 6. 1'-174.._ __ _ 'OB: Knott Interceptor, A Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 & 3. Contract ~o. 3-17 Amount of this Change Order (~~ c~~ro S_....o ...... __ o __ o ____ _ •In accordance with contr~ct provisions, the following changes in the~ .ontract anc.l/or contr-act \·:ork arc hereby authori:o<l and as cor.ipcnsation hercfor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price arc :erc~y approved. • .. Extension of Contract Time The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of time due to inclement weather The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of time for work accomplished in Change Orders 1, 2 & 3 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION -·-. ----'" .... _ -·-·· -.:--__ ...,,. Summary of Contract Time Uriginal Contract Date · Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Total Extension of Contract Time Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date Original .. Contract 65 Calendar Days 39 Calendar Days 104 Calendar Days June 30, 19i2 510 Calendar Days November 22, 1973 104 Calepdar Days ·614 Calendar Days . March 6 , 19 7 4 Price $ S,755,480.00 Prev. Au th. _Changes $ 56,573.70 Hoard authorization date: March 13, 1974 By __________________ __,"r:::-:'.~~~ Contractor AGENDA ITEM #~S(c) This Change (Xl01J:j~ $ 0.00 Amended Con.tract Pr ice . $ s,.s12,os3. 10 -I- Approved: COUNTY SJ\!\ITATIO!J DISTRICTS of Orange.County, California . ,. ""' - RESOLUTION NO. 74-44-3 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-17 AS COMPLE~E -·A RESOLUTIO~ OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SMJITATION DIS11 RICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-17 AS CONPLE~E AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT • * ·* * * * * • * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange· county, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, J. F. Shea Company, Inc., has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract ·for KNOTT INTERCEPTOR,.A PORTION OF REACH 1 AND REACHES 2 & 3, CONTRACT NO. 3-17, on the 6th of March, 1974; and, Section 2. That by letter, Boyle ~ngineering Corporation, :. District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance· with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief· Engineer of the Districts has concurred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That Knott Interce.ptor:, a Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 & 3, Contract No. 3-17, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 30th of June, 1972; and, Section 5. That the. Chairman of the Dis·trict is hereby authorized and directed to execute a .Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with J. F. Shea Company, Inc. setting forth the terms and conditions· for acceptance of said Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 & 3, Contract No. 3-17, is hereby approved; and~ Section 7. That the Chairmari and Secretary of the Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said ~gree~ent on behalf of the District. PASSED Arm ADOFT:m L1t a reculnr meet in[;-held M.::i.rch 13, · 1974. AGENDA ITEM 1156 -J-DISTRICT 3 • ME M 0 R A'N DU M March 7, 1974 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer SUBJECT: Knott Interceptor, Contract No. 3-18 COUNTY SANlTATIO~~ D:sT~ .. ~. ~ of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVH~l'E FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 921•) (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2.C l 1 The 96" RCP. in Bolsa Avenue between Beach Boulevard and N·ewland Street has been completed. Construction is presently west of Beach Boulev~rd and is progressing at a rate of .80 feet per day. Bol sa Avenue east of Beach is n~:,.w open to traffic in both ·directions. Backfilling and compaction is nearly complete. Base course paving can be expected by March 15th. Paving over the first 1500 feet of the project will be postponed to coordinate with Southern California Gas Company construction. Bruce Taylor is presently working on the project to minimize the adverse effects on the public. REL:BEW:ss AGENDA rrEM #59 -K-DISTRICT 3 '·-·~~_;r::·!·~ ·~ ~L1l .wf.?i.Ml .NSif'.' •tii ltL_J lJLJ LJLJ 1 ~IJ A'lf . IL _....4 1 .. . · -1 ... r ]GJ D~ ~hri F 1 1 ~~;: "'" 0 PL,,n . 1 ~ 3 . -·----sri ~~ ~_t_J Flfi ltr; Ho "•< st. ·~~~~~¥JU I W~TM I N5ifR ·1 m1 ~w!Jl L ;_m," ~ 0 0 0 3 tll g (5 a Wf5 1M\N Sif-Z. -I l, ~ ~ j :,~~ 0 I ~J o ,-: ... ,.) 2 OJ a ~ ! .-: J: HA'Z .¥!0 l I /j;y ~'. l ~~ tC>A ,, i 1·1···~_,,......... .... ... ... . . I .....___ _ __. ..__ 111111 '~~~WN1jj1 I ,;J.1 11~~ .. .. .. ' .. ., . . . , _ .·. , .. ~: ··~ . 11 COUN 1'Y Dli :;r~·. -..-1" ~ 1·1s \N~i tvq ~"Sje'K . I of{N6f ·: ~ . IQ M1. MU • ..,,A L· .·1 . '!1· · P Ar2 K .· ...... -;/l.J f1 . . . VI I . Ui .,.:. .. :-j I ,... Ill fj) • -.. . ._: l[l l z til ~ I '1'I z t ,t _ ~ --~ I ~~~ ~ ~ ~ .--i-~_.....~~~~~~..;....~~~~--~.---~~~~ f;J;~w··~ MJ·: u z A LL : ~ ~~ ·~ 0 <f <l t ~ 3 :r: ~1 L.5A b.._ _ · . ..i:;--_-------_---,. . L~u.>u uu 1 _J LJ _uL_ ~~.a aacrr.' 0 -•"· r-. """= -~ -ti"&- -, , ~ A.vc-, --~ FTw~~1Y;1 g -\ ~rn 1 J \ <! fl 10 RCIN6C iJ fl> I n CONTl<'.ACT.,, '3-le>"" kNOi T INT e-R Ct'PiO ~ · 1 ' i . ., I J Lf6LN O _ . 'l COM !0 l f1f e e e e • To Bf CONSTr<:Uc.TfO 11•u11 11 11 •110 1111 11111111111 111u 11111 111u111•1111u11 ~ k'NOTT ( N \r:RCC'"Pi O~ 3 M!Lf'5 o F 0 ~" PIF'f' CON T lZ /~Ci AWAr<.D.}:-D1 G -1-97? CO-ST; ~ ~ ~"?'!, -i I~ SCHfOULf0 1F Ot<. CO M PLfil O N: C,-f-7~ ~· '-. MILLER . NISSON 8 KOGLER C LAR I'( M I L LE R ATTORN E:Y S AT LAW 201 4 NOR 7 H BROADWA\· TELEPHON E C . A RTH U R N I SSON NE LSON K OCLC:R AREA CODE 71 4 S A NTA ANA . CA LI FORNIA 9 2706 H . \..AWS O N M E A D March 11; 1974 TO THE DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 / 7, 8 and 11 5 42-6771 Enclosed please find an Analysis of Governmental Conflicts of Interest Act as it applies to County Sanitation Districts and proposed ·Guidelines for your consideration . . ' My recommendation is to adopt the proposed Guide- lines and thereby avail yourselves of the immunity to certain civil penalties should any one of you be sued under the Act. In my analysis I have Xed out tw9 paragraph s on page 2 because I revised Sections 3 and 4 in the Guidelines enclosed. The effect of the decision of the Superior Court of Nevada County is discussed in the · analysis. It d oes not change my recommendation regarding the adoption of the Guidelines enclosed. Respectfully submitted, ed~-).di~ C. Arthur Nisson, General Couns e l ... _-.. __ CAN:ac ··--... __ _ Enclosures I '2- ANALYSIS OF GOVERNMENTAL CONFLICTS OF INTI:REST ACT AS IT APPLIES TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Basically there are two parts to this Act. The first part of the Act (Chapter 3) defines actions which are prohibited to public officials. It permits local agencies, such as county sanitation districts, to adopt guidelines not in conflict or less restrictive than is set forth in the Act itself. As a benefit for the adoption of local agency guide- lines·, a· local agency public official is exempt from the civil penalties.as provid~d in Chapter 5 of the Act (Government Code §3751 and §3753) when he or she makes a good-faith attempt ~o comply with said local guidelines. The civil penalties provided in Chapter 5 are: (a) The District Attorney or any citizen, or group of citizens, may bring an action to. enjoin violations and compel compliance, i.e. suit in equity for an injunction; (b) If the Court determines that the public official ~iolated the Act (i.e~ participated in an. act p~ohibited to him or her by reason of a material economic interest therein) and realized an economic benefit as a result of the action or decision, the Court may impose a penalty against the public official up to three times the value of the benefit realized; (c) A violation shall be grounds for forfeiture of office and disqualification from holding public office. There is one additional civil penalty.that is applicable if the district adopts guidelines re~uiring statements disclosing financ~al interests etc. by its designated public officials. That additional penalty is one up to three times the value of the o~itted interest which should have been dis- closed. The guidelines drafted 2/21/74 and submitted to the Exe cu-Ci ve Corruni ttee 'comply with the provisions of § 36 26 and, if ~dopted and complied with in good faith, would provide· . immunity from the above-described civil penalties. There is one civil penalty which is not avoided by the adoption of local guidelines. That is the award of reasopable attorney f~es and court costs to the prevailing party or parties whether or not there has been a final judgment in the matter. Section 3 "S.ubstantial Conflict" Section 4 Economic Effect" c~n be expand more precisely spell J ,st what qualifies as s should be noted to provide equal application official, e.g. a $900 interest official with a $200,000 asset, it becomes 'ficant to a public official less asset. believed that the Act itself make a determination of 3 and 4. -2- Section 3700 defines "Economic Inte:r;est" ~s being a situation where one's personal action or decision will have a· "material economic effept 11 upo~ any of four categories: (1) An investment of more than $1,000 in a business entity, excluding deposits.in banks or savings and loans, credit u~ion shares, cash surrender value of life insurance and bonds, unless they are convertible. (2) An interest of more than $1,000 in real property, excluding a horn~ or property used primarily for personal or recreational purposes. "(3) Any source of income, loans or gifts ·ciggregating $250.in value within l2 months. (4) Any business entity in which the public official .. is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee er holds any position of management. The interests enumerated include "°indirect" interests· defined as ownership by: (1) The official)s spouse, dependent· children or agent; (2) A business.entity in which the official, his spouse, dependent children or agent, possess more than 50%.of own~rship; or (3) A trust in which the public official, his spouse or dependent children have a present or future interest worth more than $1,000. A further exception to· "economic interest" is where action or decision of the public official affects an -3- econonic interest of the official as a member of the public or significant seg~ent of the public or as a member of an industry, profession or occupation to no greater extent than any other such ne~er Gf the public segment of the public or an industry, profession or occupation. The second main feature of the Act is Chapter 4 and deals ~ith disclosure statements. Public 6fficials of local aqencies, such as the County Sanitation District, are NOT required to file disclosure statements. A local agency may adopt guidelines requiring the filing of disclosure statements disclosing economi~ interests as defined in Government Code §3700 (see·above for detail) together with any additiqnal informa- tion required by local guidelines. The statements would have to be filed each year in April with the County Clerk and within 30 days after leaving office. It would be my opinion that if adopted they should also be filed in.the office of the Secretary ~ of the District. If local guidelines regarding the Conflicts of Interest Act do not require the =iling of a disclosure statement, there is no possible way to fail to-include an eccinomic interest inadvertently or otherwise. It is noted that an additional civil penalty is possible where disclosure statements are required and an economic interest is omitted. There is some uncertainty as to whether a person filing a disclosure statement must enum.erate each source of income aggregating $250 in value within 12 months when he is -4- a professional man, e.g. insurance broker, accountant, doctor, engin~er, etc. This provision of the Act has been amended by SB 1340 (which has been signed by the Governor) to provide that sources of income of more than $250 can b€ stated generally by naming the business entity rather than specific sources, i.e. customers, clients or patients. This Act, however, will not become effective until January 1, 1975~ It does contain a statement.as follows: ·~The Legislature finds and de·clares that the amendments effective by thi's Act are declaratory of . the legislative intent in enacting "The Governmental Conflict of Interests Act". It should be noted that this specific portion of the. Act has been ruled unconstitutional invasion of the right of ·" privacy by the Superior Court in Nevada County~ Although this is not the decision· of a· court of record and its decision will be appealed, it is persuasive and indicative. In view of· the Act's uncer~ainty, the new legislation and the court decisi6n, I am of the opinion a statement naming the business entity from which more than $250 of income -was received would suffice if disclosure statements are to be made a part of local guide- lines. . ~· THE QUESTIONS THE DIRECTORS OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS HAVE BEFORE THEM ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Whether or not to adopt any local guidelines regarding conflicts of interest. 2. If local guidelines are to be adopted, the -5- following additional determinations must be made: (a) Who are "public officials" insofar as the County Sanitation District is concerned; (b) What additional requirements should be included, i.e. in excess of State law; (c) Should disclosure statements be required as a part of the local guidelines; (d) What additional information should be included (i.e. beyond that required in the State law) in the lo~al guidelines relating to disclosure state- men ts .. c. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California -6- H.i::SOl:...UTim~ :~o • • \ RE.SOLC:'IC~~ O.? 'l'i!B ~301\RD OF DI P.EC'.!:'OTIS OZ 1I'lL: COL~~;·:iy s;.~HT.:\'I' IO:~ DIS'I' .. ~ICT :·IO. OF' OR:'\:-:c.: ccc:TY ~"\.D<):'TilIG Ct;ID:··~Lr::!:S FOR T:iE I::? L:::>~E:-, T ;l,:· Io~~ OF T rn~ {~0\71~ P.~·!~ t~l.~T ELL co:::a·LIC'.r O? H~TE!lliS'IS ACT BE IT P.!:SOL'n::D by the Bo~rd of Directors of the County Sanitation District. iio. _of Orange Cour:ity, Californi:l: SECTION 1. PCP.POSE l\ND EFFECT Pur3uant to Section 3626 of the Governr:.~mt Cotle (all. Section references herein are to the G6vernnent Code unless othe~Nise specified) , the Board of Di+ectors of the County Sanitation District No. of Orar:ige County, Cali.fornia --- hereby adopts the follo~ing guid9lines for its public officials in determining wh2ther they have. ·an econowic int.crest or interests which are in substantial conflict with thoir official duties and powers under Subdivision (a) of Section 3625 ~nd in Jeter- mining whether they have an econo:nic interest. in ;natters for purposes of Subdivision (o) of Section 3625. Nothing contained in this resolution is intended to modify or abridge the provi3io~s of the Gov~rnrncntal Conflict of Interests Act (Sectio!1 3600 et seq.), Sections 1090-1097; or any other provisions of law pert~i~ing to conflicts of inter~st. This resolu~ion shall be interpreted in a·rnanner consistent thcrewi th. ~~othing co.r:·~ai!1ed. herein shall be deemed adopted pursuant to or in imple~entation of Section 3603 or Section 3704. SEC·TIOi·I 2. D:SSIGtil\.'I'IQl,; OF OFFICIALS The "rH1blic official3," ''o.::ficials," and :'3lcct.iv~ and appointive o-ffic·?.rs'' subj<-~ct to the t-)rOV:!.~~!.~J_:.:; r::f Section 3fi25 .'"lre: 1. Board of Directors 2. General .Manager 3 • Chief Er..gincer 4. Secretary 5. County Auditor acting as ex officio Auditor ...,,., of the District 6. Director of ~inance of the J.A.O. SECTION 3. SUBSTANTIAL CONFLICT A. An official shall not be deemed to have an economic interest in substantial conflict with the proper exercise of an official's duties within the meaning of Government Code Section 3625(a) if he has only a "remote economic interest" and if the fact of such interest is disclosed t·o the body or Board of the . District and noted in its official records, and the~official in no way attempts to influence any oth~r public official.of the District with respect to any matter_ concerning such remote eco7 nomic interest. As used in this section, the term "remote economic interest" means: 1. That of a non-salaried member or officer of· a nqn- profit corp~ration; 2. That of a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee or holder ?f any position of management in any business entity contracting with the District if such business entity has ten or more other employees and if the officer was an employee or agent of said entity for at least three years prior to his initially accepting his office. For purposes of this subsection, time of employment with the business entity by the officer shall be counted in computing such three-year period even though such entity has been con"verted from one form of business organization to a differ·ent form ~-f business organiza- tion within thr0e years of the initial taking of office by such -2- officer. Time of employment in such case shall be counted only if, after the transfer or change in organization, the real or ultimate o:-mership for the contracting party is the same or sub- stantially similar to that which existed before such transfer or change in organization. For the purposes of this subsection, stockholders~ bondholders, partners, or other persons holding an . . interest in the business entity are regarded as having the "real or ultimate ownership" of such entity. 3. That of a parent in the earnings of his minor child for personal services; 4. That of a landlord or tenant of a business entity contracting with the District; 5. That of an attorney of a business entity con- tracting with th~ District; 6. That of a supplier of goods or services to the District when such goods or services have been supplied to • the District by such officer for at least five years prior to his "'-""' . election or appointment to office; 7. That of a person s~bject ~o the provisions of Government Code Section 1090 in any contract or agreement entered into pursuant to the provisions of the California Land Conservation Act of 1965; 8. That of a~ ?fficer, director, or employee of a bank, bank holding company, or savings and loan association with which the Districi has the relationship of borrower or depositor, debtor or creditor; 9. That of a shareholder of a corporation con- tr acting with the District if less t.han 3 1 ~ of the shares of such corporation are owned by such officer and total annual income to the officer from dividends, including the value of stock qividends from the corporation, does not exceed 5% of the officer's total annual income, and any other payments made to him by the -3- corporation do not exceed 5% of his ~otal annual income. B. An economic interest in substantial conflict with the proper exercise of an official's duties within the meaning of Section 3625(a) shall not be deemed to exist unless the official would be required .to disqualify himself under Section 3625(b) on a continuous and regular basis from activities and actions which constitute a :major and~significant portio·n of his official duties and the~eby impair his ability to function effectively and fulfill duties of his office. SECTION 4. MATERIAL ECONO.MIC EFFECT An action or decision shall not be deemed to have a material effect on .an economic interest unless the official has reason to believe that, by reason of the action or decision, an investment, or int~rest in real property may increase or decrease in value, other than negligibly, or a business entity from which the official derives income or in which he holds a position of employment or management will gain or lose monetarily, other than negligibly. A change of less than 1% shall be deemed negligible. SECTION 5. MINISTERIAL AND CLERICAL DUTIES Section 3625(b) shall apply only ~o actions which involve discretion or judgment. It does not apply to actions which are solely ministerial or cl~rical. SECTION 6. PARTICIPATION A. The terms "participate" and "attempt to influence'' as used in Section 362S(b) shall be deemd to include but not -4- L>.e limi te<l to partici?ation in deliberations or deb a tc, or voting on the issue, and the following ~ction:; wh~n related to the ~erits of th2 issue to be decided on or acted upon: 1. Preparation of oral or ~ritten reports. 2. Pendition o~ orQl or written aJvic~. 3. Testi~ony before ·a public agency. 4. Discussio~s with any officials authorized to decide o~ assist other public official~ to deciGe the matter. 5. Submissio:i of letters or othar d.ocu .. "TIGnts to any official authorized to decide or assist other ?Ublic officials to decide.the natter. 6. Issuance or denial of an of~icial ap2roval. B. Nothing contained herein or in S~ction 3625 shall abridge the right of ~my citizen, ·whether or not a public official, to si.lbmi t information· or e:{pres.s views on the sa:ne basis as any other private citizen, provided such is done ih public and the per3on indicates he is acting in a private ca?acity. C. An official directly involved in a matter, whether as a party, or applicant, or otherwise may, in his private ca9acit;y, .d h . I"' • • ~ -l provi e w. atever J..n=or:natJ..on is nec.~ssu.ry anc.. ?Cr.torm any ot~1er steps which are required of other citiz0ns in the sa~e situation, individually or by cour.s.el. He :may not, ho~-l-2Ver, discuss the matter privatel7 with .officials who must decide the natter. SEC?IO:J 7. NECESSITY A •. An official shall not be su~j~ct to Section 3623 (b) with respect to any Ga~ter which cannot ba legally acted upon or decided without his particip~tion. B. Section 3625 (b) shall not apply ·where: 1. l'\ statutory quoru:n cannot b~ ac:1ieved by contin1..lance or ~·Ti ~~in legnlly mandatC!d tim2 lir.1i ts; -5- 2. r-:o!"e. t~1,~n a .si.mr>lc majority vote L~ rc<"!uircc.I. to t.:lke a pro~osad action, and the number of offici~ls entitled to vote is less than the nu~h~r required; or 3. Tha official is, by law, the sole officar who can perfor~ the a9tion or rna~e the decision. C. In cases · .. ::iere subsections (b) (1) or (b) (2) ap71ly, all othqrwise qu3.lified officials shall be entitled to participate. D. In all cases involving e>:cm?tions hereunder, the officials shall conply with Section 3625(d). SECTION 8. DISQUALIFICATION An official wh.o refrains from acting in accordance with Section 3625(b) should publicly announce such abstension but need.not declare the nature of the interest whi~h disqualifies such o£fic'ial. 5"2.:CTim~ 9. r:·nERPP.ETl•.TION Any official '·"·ho is unsu::e of his duties i.!nder Section 3625 should sGcure a written opinion fro~ counsel. When said opinion is complied with in th~ good faith belief that it is · consistent with those prqvisions, said action shall be deemed in compliance with th-2se guidelines, and such official shall be c:xer.ipt · from the civil penalties in Section 3751 and the '-. . . sanc·1..ions in s·ection 3753. SECTIO~ 10. LIMITATIONS ON ACTIONS No action shall be brought pursuant to Section 3751 of the Government Code A. To restrai~ the execution of or to set aside as void any decision, contract, order, p~r~it, resolutio:.1 or other official \lction unless the on th2 Secretary of th-2 Distri~t ~vi chin thirt:/ (]O) re~~olut~o:'. or other of E.ici.:il ?\cl:io~; .iJ. To 2~join a~ offici~l -6- an o~ficial to comply with the pro?ision of Division 4. 5 of Ti tlc 1 of th:~ Govcr~ncnt Code or of this re~olution, U:1less .th~ c-:>:r.plaint or petition has been filed. and scr..red uithin 180 days after the violation of St:.!ction 36~5 of. the Govern~ent Code occurr~d. SECTIO~; 11. SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phras~ of th~s resolution is for any reason held.by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect th~ validity of the re~aini~g portions of this resolution. The Board of Directors hereby declares that it would have passed this resolution and each s2ction, subsection, sentence·, .clause and phrase. thereoi, irrespective· of the fact that any one or more sectio~s, subsections, sentences, claus12 or phrase be declared invalid. SECTimJ 12. I:~TECTIVE DAT:S · This resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED .AT A REGULAR .MEETING HELD -7- .- II -- BOARD S O F D IR ECTO RS Count y Sanita t ion Di str icts of Orange County, California ALL DI STRICTS JOINT BOA RDS SUPPLE M E i ~T A L AGE rmA ITE MS MA R CH ~l 3 J 197 4 -7:3 0 P.M. Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ell i s . A v en ue Fou n tain Va lley,· Ca l if., 92708 Te lepho nes: Area Code 7 1 4 5 4 0.-2 910 962-2 411 AGENDA (1 8) Consideration of Re s olution No . 1 4-40 , accepting Add i tional Secondary Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1 , Job No . Pl-9-1 , as compl~te ; authorizing ex ecut i on of a Notice of Comp l et i on ; and approving Final Clo s eou t Agre em ent . See.page "IV " (24 ) Co ns i deration of ro ll call vot e motion app r ovi ng . Jo i nt Operating and Capital Ou tlay Revolving Fund warran t books for s i gnature of the Chairman of Di strict No . 1 , and authorizing payment ·or c l aims listed o n page "I " DIST RICT 5 ( 30) . Consideration of motion approvi ng warrants . See page "II" DISTRICT 7 (38 ) Conside r ation of mot i on approving warrants . See page II III II DI STRICTS 3 & 1 1 (42) Consideration of mot i on · approving suspense fund war r ants . See page ".II " DI STR I CT 11 (4 3) Consideration of motion approvi ng warrants . See page "III " DI STRICT 2 (51) Consideration of mot i on approving warrants . See page u II " DISTRICT 3 (60) Consideration of motion approving warrants . See pa g e II II" WARRANT NO. . 22339 22340 223,n . 223 it2 . 22343 22344 22345 22346 22347 22348 22349 22350 22351 22352 22353 22354 22355 22356 22357 22358 22359 22360 22361 22362 22363 22364 22365 22366 22367 22368 22369 22370 22371 22372 22373 22374 22375 22376 22377. 22378 22379 22380 22381 22382 22383 22384 22385 22386 22387 22388 22389 22390 22391 22392 22393 22394 22395 22396 22397 22398 . 22399 22400 t ~-JOINT 10PEFL;;TING .FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Abaco Packa g ing C8rp., Containers $ Advanced Electronics, Batteries Air Conditioning Supply Co., Freight Al's Tree Service, Trees Topped· All Bearing Service, Inc., Belts Allied Supply Co., Valves American Chain & Gear Co., Pump Parts .American Compressor Co., Compressor Parts American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Technical Manuals American Lock & Supply, Inc., Hardware City of Anaheim, Power Anchor Packing Co., Pump Packing Apco Supply, Electric Supplies Appliance Refinishing Co., Refinish Equipment Arrow Glass & Mirror Co.~ Office Partitions Barksdale Controls Division, Controls Barnes Delaney, Engine Parts · Bearing Specialty Co., Pump Parts Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair Benner Sheet Metal, Inc., Fabricating Blower Paper Co., Janitorial Supplies Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams Broadlick Art Supply, Drafting Supplies C & R Reconditioning Co., Engine· Repair Cal-Glass for Research, Inc., Lab Supplies California Auto Collision, Inc., Truck Repair California Collator Sales, Binding Supplies Certified Laboratories, Solvents College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials Commercial & C.B. Communications, Co mmunication Equipment Consolidated Elect. Distr., Electric Supplies & Conduit · ( MO 1-9 -7 4 ) Consolidated Reproductions, Printing Constructors Supply Co., Tools & Hardware Control Specialists, Inc., Regulator Copeland Mot ors, Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa County'Wate~ District, Water Mr. Crane, Crane Rental Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage Curtin Matheson Sc ientific, Lab Supplies D & C Concrete Pumping Service, Concrete Pumping C. R. Davis Supply Co.·, Fire Hose John M. Deck, Engine & Equipment Parts Deckert Surgical Co., First Aid Supplies Marvin E. Derfler Co., Pu mp Parts Diamond C8re Drilling Co., Core Drilling 'Don's Schwinn Cyclery, Bicycles Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies & Printing Elect Air Tool Co., Incinerator Parts Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Mon itoring (MO 12-14-66) Engineers Sales Service, Inc., Pump Parts Ensign Products Company, Lu b ricant · Enterpri se Printing Co ., Printing Supplies Envirotech Corp., Pump Parts · Envirotech -Sparling, Me ter Repair Fi scher & Porter Co., Regulator & Chlorine Parts ·Fo ss Com p any, Foam City of Fountain Va lley, Wa ter Reimbursement Fee Willi am H. Fox, Emp l oyee Milea g e Fra nce Pro ducts, Compressor & Parts Fre dson, Eq uipment Parts ~re~way Machine & We ld ing , Machining· Garden Grove Lum be r & Cement Co., Building Materials I-1 AMOUNT 33.71 50.40 18.96 1,995 \ ] 82 :""r",J 489 .3·8 119. 59 186.46 52.5'.J 42.79 . 20.70 88.2J 47.41 116~00 1,080.00 593.18 1,596.00 201.23 81.95 152.25 248.32 26.00 28 .58 655.00 19.61 207.94 . 75.63 i64.45 446 ~1 111 ~ 2,667 .• 66 21.14 260.91 458.96 16.43 . 6 • 0'.) 1,283:51 52.26 41.94 .45.00 905.68 40.19 56 .57 114.71 374 .m) 174.28 640.46 109.10 l,8ono00 173 .46 278.6 8 70.08 16L~. 0 8 106 '-l) 2,066.92 42. 0() . 693.31 27 ._3".) 71 3 .55 19.99 335.6 5 86 9.42 WARRANT NO. 22401 22402 22403 22404 22405 ""~4C>6' ~407 22408 22409 22410 22411 22412 22413 22414 22415 22416 22417 22418 22419 22420 22421 22422 22423 22424 22425 22426 22427 22428 22429 22430 ')'2431 ~432 22433 22434 22435 22436 22437 22438 22439 22440 22441 .. 22442 22443 22444 22445 22446 22447 22448 22449 22450 22451 22452 22453 22454 22455 '-'2456 ~~457 22458 22459 22460 22461 22462 22463 22464 22465 IN FAVOR OF General Electric Co., Electric Supplies $ General Electric Supply Co., Electric Supplies General Telephone Co. Georgia Pacific, Building Materials Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlor·ine (Contract 1-1-73) Golden West Fertilizer· co., Grit Removal Graybar Electric Co., Electric Supplies Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Parts & Repair Halsted & Hoggan, Inc., Pump Parts Harbor Fire Protection, Fire Extinguisher Service Hardware Systems Co., Lab Supplies ·Hardy & Harper, Inc., Paving Charles G. Hardy, Inc., Hardware Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal Hersey Products, Inc., Valves Honeywell, Inc., Controls, Strip Charts & Meter Repair Howard Supply Co., Pipe Supplies {M0.1-9~74) City of Huntington Beach, Water Inland Nut & Bolt Co., Hardware Inte·rna·tional Business Machines, Maintenance Agreement Jensen Instrument Co., Controls Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies & Fittings King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, Belts & Boiler Parts Kleen Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware Koppl Company, Piping LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tools· & Hardware L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Service The Lacal Company, Inc., Cleaner Lewco Electric Company, Pump Repair & Truck Parts A;·· J. Lynch Campany, Trawl Containers R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., Paving Materials John McCullough, Employee Mileage M B Industrial Supply, Hardware Metropolitan Supply Co., Gauges E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers B. Jean Mosher, Employee Mileage Nashua Corp., Reproduction Supplies National Lumber & Supply, Inc., Building Materials Nelson-Dunn, Inc., Engine Parts · City of Newport Beach, Water C. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel Retainer Occidental College, Ecological Boat Charter City· of Orange, Water Orange County Boiler & Industrial Repair, Freight Orange County Chemical Co., Chemicals · Orange County Stamp Co., Office Supplies Orange County Wholesale Electric, Switches Pacific Telephone Co. Ron Parker, Employee Mileage Norman Parsons, Employee Mileage Polaris Battery Co., Batteries Porter Boiler Service; Inc., Boiler Parts Postmaster, Postage Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileag~ Quikspray, Inc., Pump Radio Products Sales, Inc., Meter Supplies Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal Red Valve Company, Inc., Freight The Register, Annual Subscription Gordon E. Reid Drafting, Drafting Services Republic Supply Co. of Calif., Hardware Robbins & f·Iyers, Inc., Pump Parts SGA Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing & Drafting Supplies I-2 AMOUNT 141.77 791.11 1, 2·J7. 05 822.53 4,496.73 ~,2~8.0J 293 .68 202.J3 489.83 29.93 186.07 285.0J 144.08 140.0J 52.03 458.99 6,517.27 17.03 1,444.85 12.82 277.25 1,124.58 159.41 281.53 97.72 511.43 371.57 l,722.10 47.39 71.1() 146 .1~8 448.29 110.16 7.88 289~28 2,018.69 21.75 118.31 ·61.04 36.60 399.99 80::>.oo 375.0:> 29.19 16.45 75.29 .7.46 84.53 462.41 15.60 6.3::> 322.01 32.61 500.00 49.14 1,197.0:> 23.0:> 40.0:) 14~75 33. O'J. 136 .0') 38.12 113.93 82.TJ 185.35 WARRANT NO. 22466 22467 22468 22469 22470 22471 22472 22473 22474 22475 22476 22477 22478 22479 22480 22481 22482 22483 22484 22485 22486 22487 22488 22489 22490 22491 22492 22493 22494 22~95 22496 22497 22498 22499 22500 22501 22502 22503 22504 22505 22506 .. 22507 22508 22509 22510 22511 22512 22513 IN FAVOR OF . Santa Ana Electric Motors, Elect. Motor & Motor Rewind $ Santa Ana Electronics Co., Electronic Supplies Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies City of Seal Beach, Water Security Industrial Supply Co., Flanges Shaw Pum? & Supply, Inc., Pump & Pump Parts Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies A. H. Shipkey, Inc., Truck Tires John Sigler, Employee Hileage Fred Sinasek, Employee Mileage Smith Optical Service, Safety.Glasses ·so. Cal Sign Co., Sign South Orange Supply, Pump Parts Southern California Edison Company Southern California Gas Company Southern California Water Company Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water Speed-E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Stanco Mfg. & Sales, Inc., Truck Repair Standard Concrete Material, Inc., Concrete Standard Oil Company, Gasoline & 011 Stang Hydronics, Inc., Pump & Pump Parts T & H -Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Rent"al Bruce Taylor, Project Report Expenses & Employee Mileage Taylor-Dunn, Equipment Parts . 39 Stake & Building Supplies, Survey Supplies Triangle Steel & Supply Co·., Steel · J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Hardware The Tustin News, Bid Notice -Truck Bodies U. S. Equipment Co., Inc., Compressor Parts Un.ion Oil Co., Ga so line United Au.to Parts, Truck Parts United Reprographics, Inc., Printing & Drafting Supplies Utilities Supply Co., Tools Vaniman Camera, Photo Processing John R. Waples R.S., Odor Consultant Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc., Engine Parts & Gaskets West Coast Industries, Building Materials Western Corp., Electric Supplies Western Salt Co., Salt Western Wholesale Co., Equipment Parts Wilson Ford Sales, Truck Parts Russell Wold, Employee Mileage Wood's GMC, Inc., Manual & Truck Repair Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage Xerox Corp., Office Supplies & Reproduction Service Zodiac Paper Co., Prlnting Supplies Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting & COD Expenses AMOUNT 572.82 17 .59 lT:>.48 8.88 387.67 373 r rr '=. 1,094.~ 72.16 35.70 37.38 32.71 41.48 107.19 28,463.52 1,487.06 3.21 41.16 323". 37 123.18 911.70 2,525.14 1,807.05 247.50 106.25 41.00 34.34 286.35 56.26 8.96 810.67 124.0 Si 358~ 1,230.76 93.72 . 69 .96 218.10 260.38 84.52 309.60 96.20 211.49 .13.67 40.14 357.19 . 31. 50 1,215.20 10.1. 71 160.35 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING $ 101,691.51 I-3 WARRANT NO. 22514 22515 22516 "~517 ~518 22519 22520 22521 22522 22523 22524 22525 22526 22527 22528 22529 22530 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF B & J Construction Co., Contractor PW-032 $ Bassett Office Furniture, Office Equipment James G. Biddle Co., Test Equipment John Carollo Engrs., Engineering -Plant Construction Ducommun Metals & Supply Co., Tools E.T.I. & Kordicl{, Contractor P2-ll-l & I-8-3 Ficker Architects, Architectural Services J-13 City of Fountain Valley, Plan Check Fee J-13 Grillias, Pirc, Rosier, Alves~ Architectural Engr. Pl-16 Hemisphere Constructors, Contractor P2-21 James E. Hoagland co-. & Hoagland Engr. ·co., Contr. Pl-9-1 Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. & Monteleone & McCrory, J-10 Suit Set.tlement ( i-IO 12-12-73) J. Ray Construction Co., Contractor J-13 Richard Terry & Associates, E.I.R. 73-74 Project Report Twining Laboratories, Testing P2-21, I-~-3 & J-13 United Reprographics, Inc., Plans & Specs Pl-16 F. T. Ziebarth & Ziebarth & Alper, Contractor J-4-1 AMOUNT 3,089.50 328.44 39Q.ll 55, L~7l. l8 159 .60 101, 96::). Q:) 2,929.50 385 .OQ i, 298. 75 54,105.31 18,Jl2.62 40,000.00 180,538.13 2,65C) .0) 121.Q:) 11,323.20 2, 555. 2·:) TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING $ 475,317.54 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF $ 577,009.05 I-4 DISTRICT NO. 2 WARRANT NO. ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF . 22531 22532 22533 22534 22535 22536 22537 22538 22539 22540 22541 ·22542 22543 22544 22545 John Carollo Engineers, Los Alisos Feasibility Study $ Clean Water Consultants, Phase II Anaheim Forebay Kasler Corporation & L.H. Woods & Sons, Contractor 2-14-2 Lowry and Associates, Engineering Service 2-14-3, and Construction Survey 2-14-1 and 2-14-2 . Sully Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 2-14-1 Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Inspection 2-14-1 DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF State of California, Annexation Process~ng Fee 3D & 3E ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF. $ Boyle Engi~eering, Engineering Se+vice 3-17 & 3-19, Construction Survey 3-17 & 3-18, Design Survey 3-19 $ Jenkins Construction Company, Contractor 3-12-1 Testing Engfneers, Inc., Pipe Inspection 3-18 A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Saliba Co~, Contractor 3-18 Twining Laboratories, Concrete· Testing 3-18 DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS . IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering Service 3-17 J. F. Shea Co., Inc., Contracto.r 3-17 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF City of Newport Beach, Connection Fee Collection II $ $ $· $ $ &\10UNT 1,031. 23 . 18' 951. 28 4,387.50 15,838.75 354,693. ~ 1,118.00 445.00 21,055.75 11,256.80 1,482.00 151,209.90 14.75 185,019. ~ 185,464.20 ·11, 465 ~ 00 119,933.33 131,398.33 304.30 .. . " ...... DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 22546 22547 22548 22549 22550 22551 22552 22553 22554 22555 22556 ....,,.,, 22557 Boyle Engineering, Engineering Service State of California, Annexation 36 Processing Fee State of California, Annexation 35 Processing Fee FIXED OBLIGATION FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF City of Anaheim, Annual JOS Payment City of Buena Park, Annual JOS Payment City of Fullerton, Annual JOS Payment Garden Grove Sanitary District, Annual JOS Payment City of ta Habra, Annual JOS· Payment City of Orange, Annual JOS Payment City of Placentia, Annual JOS Payment City of Santa Ana, Annual JOS Payment DISTRIC'l' NO. 11 -ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Kordick & Son, Inc., Contractor 11-12 III AMOUNT 25.50 70.00 70.00 $ 165.50 $ 1,561.80 96.70 1,561.80 241.80 386.90 1,474.70 241.80 4,434.50 ' $ 10,000.00 $ l0,165.50 86,959.35 RESOLUTION NO. 74-40 ACCEPTING JOB NO. Pl-9-1 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. Pl-9-1 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 ,. 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, James E. Hoagland Co. and Hoagland Engineering Co., A Joint Venture; has completed the construe- tion in accordance with the terms of the contract -for ADDITIONAL SECONDARY TREATMENT AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. Pl-9-1, on the 7th of ~arch, 1974; and, Section 2. That by letter, John Carollo Engineers, Districts' engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Se~tion 3. That the Chief Engineer of the Districts has ~ concurred in said engineer's recommendation, which said r~commendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That Additional Secondary Treatment at Reclamation ~lant No. 1, Job No. Pl-9-1, is.hereby .accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contr~ct therefor, dated the 26th of October, 1972; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with James E. Hoagland Co. and.Hoagland Engineering Co., A Joint Venture, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Additional Secondary Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-9-1, is hereby approved; and, Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 13, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #18 -IV-ALL DISTRICTS . MEtTING DATE Marc h l 3 , 1 9 74 TIME . 7:30 p .m. DISTRICTS 1 ,2 ,3 ,5,6,7 &: 1 1 DISTRICT l .(GARTHE) •••.. PATTERSON •• S/\, _L_ _+ __ _ . (CLARK ) ••.• BATTIN •.••• C-.o . ~ _+ __ _ . . RI MA ...•.. ("'\SI? __:L_ -+ -- (LANGLEY) •.•• SALTARELLI .1\J~ _/_ ----- DISTRICT 2 ($~'"=YENS ) •••• NEVIL •••.• ~~.W. _.; __ .+ __ _ !E:~NG) •••••• CHAPUT .•••• ~I ~. _.; -----__ ) •••• CLA RK ••... ~ • _.1 __ -+-__ _ LANGER) ••••• FINNELL. .• f~A~ _/ __ +_· _. _ FOX) •••••.•• MAC KA HJ ••• ~~e~ _./ ___ -__ _ PATTERSON) •• GARTHE •••• ~!}. _.; __ +-· __ _ · ·scorr r:v .1 -+-· · · ...... ········------. PERRY ••••• G.6.~Q _I ___ -__ (\4/00D) •• ROOT •••••• fV<. _I _ -~-__ (PE REZJ •••••• TEMPLE •••• [)!( .. _/_ .::..___ __ (DUTTON) ••••• STEPHENSON f\~JA. __!!:;:__ ___ _ (DUNNE) •••••• WINN •••••• }Jf . _:!_ _+ __ _ DISTRICT 3 MAC KAI~ ••• FOX •••••••• ·"---_ ..... __ _ ~ ) · g(({A ti . CLARK ) •••• BATT! N •••• (}. •• _v ___ + __ _ (SALES) •••••• BLACKMAN •• ~~. __::!_ ~ __ (MEYERS) ••••• DAVIS ••••• ~f.D _1_..,_-4-__ _ EDY.I AR DS ••• ~ • _1 ___ -__ !PATTERSON) •• GAR TH.E ••.• ,s .. _./ __ + __ . _ MATNEY) ••••• GREEN ••••• Ht>.. _1 ~ _+_· __ BROWN) •••••• HYDE ••••• .k~.t\L _; __ + __ ·_. (NU I JENS) . MAR SHOTT · ·~~ _.;_ --· ----·. PERRY •••••• C:>;i>_; ___ ---· (FRANl<I EWI CH) 6~ ••• C.{f . I ~ · 1v· 'D < .. RO OT •••••• f.u.L. -" --+--- fii:r(LI NDENJ •• SCOTT •••• .f\ I • . == DUTT ON ) ••••• S TEPHEN SO N ~fll . v . ROBERTJc) •••• STEVENS ... h~µ. -/-~---k41 eb,\ ----. --. • •••• BYRNE •• _/ _ _.:!::__ __ DISTRICT 5 ·(\ (CROUL) •••••• MC INNIS •• t-!f;. __!.___!_ ___:\ -- (BAKER) •••••• C-hARJ< , • ·~~. + _-1-_ --· KYMLA •••••••• ----=--- DISTRICT 5 PORTER ••• fft,\~D. _.; ___ -_· - <CLAR K ) •••• BATTIN •••• ~ •• _/ __ .i.._. _J_ lMC IN N I S ) ••• STORE ••••• N.~. _.;_ ---/ __ DISTRICT 7 JM qv6~~ -· -. I (PERE Z)····· ·JACKMAt~ • .6.ffr.. _j/_(_+_ -- ( ) ····CLARK · · · • .~. • ;_L.!.f. -..\..--- (GA RTHE ) ·····PAT TERSON .s.A. • _{jl ..±_ -- PO RTE R •.• fif\~0. _Ll -----(BURTOf~) .... ~ ... l.~'i . ~ \ ~:;--­ (Mer·} NN I S ), •. ~·. · .t:.l f;>. -.;------ (L J'.1 foLE Y: ~ ••• .::.i 1\L 1 ARE~LI 1U.'~. --\" _ _) --- P-ffi8JD-1 1 ~~ ., ~{ ~· / . (M ATNEY) ..... DUK E · ••.• ,l,f?. ---_-4 __ _ (CL AR I< ) •••• BAKER · • · • · U · ~ ___ ____::-__ -- (MA.TN E Y) ..... G I BBS ·····.!+~.-----~ -- DJ STRICT 8 MITCH ELL····· ------- ( ) ••.••. CLAR I< · ••••• ----· _____ _ HOLM·········-· -------· JOINT BOARDS !L ANGE R) •••••• FINNELL ••••. __:!__ __ CLARK ) ••••• BAKER •••• _···+--· CLA RK ) ..... BATTIN .... ~. __ ) ./ -SALES ••••••• BLACK MAN •••• ___ _ (EWING) ••••••• CHAPUT.::::: ~ ==== ( ) ..... CLARK .. ; .... ./ . (MEYERS) ..... DAVIS ....... -./--. - (MATNEY) •••••• DUKE .••••••• -./--- . EDY.IARDS ••••• -,;--- MAC KAIN) ••• ".Fox ••••••••• -/--- PATTERSON) ••• GARTHE •••••• -.1 ---.- MATNEY} •••••• GIBBS .•••••• -./--- MATNEY) •••••• GREEN ••••••• -/--- BROWN) ••••••• HYDE •••••••• I === . ) ....... SCOTT .. .-. . . . / FOX) ••••••••• MAC KAIN •••• -/.--- MC I N N IS) .... kYMLA •••.••• ~ ./ === NU I JENS) MAR SHOTT. • • • .! . !CROUL) ••••••• MC INNIS •••• -/--- STEVENS) •••• ·.NEVIL ••••••• ;--- GARTHE) •••••• PATTERSON ••• -/--- p ERRY ••••••• -./--- . · · PORTER •••••• -.;---- (BURTON) ••••• : ~R ••••• -/--- RIMA •••••••• -./.--- ~FRANKI~WJCH). CTACA'r'O ••••• I ·== .M~J '( .. ·.~e arns ..... . WOO D J ••• ROOT •••••••• ~ --. LANGLEY) SALTARELLI •• -1---- !HOLLI NDEN) ••• SCOTT ••••••• -.1--- PEREZ)~ .••••• TEMPLE •••••• ~ -- DUTTO N ~~ ••• ~ • ~TE;'~ ~NS~N. • If-==== !ROB ERT~ J ~ •••.• ;, TE Vt NS .••.• _:{_ __ MC INN~SJ •• , .STORE ••••••• I . • , ••••• BYRNE . · .• -. -..1--- DUNNE).". ••••• vfl NN ......... -,-. --. PE REZ ) I I I I I I ,JACKMAN. I. I -r -- OTH tRS HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS DU NN CLA RK E TAYL OR BROWN NIS S ON BLISS BOETTNER CA RL.SON FIM STER GA LL OWA Y HOH EN ER HO WARD HUNT KEITH KE NNE Y LYN CH MADDOX MARTIN SON P I EF(S ALL STEVE NS .--·-- -;--r .;· _,; -- MEETING DATE Ma rch l 3 , 1 9 7 4 TIME 7 :]0 p .m. DISTRICTS 1 ,2 ,3 ,5,6 ,7 & 11 DIST RICT 1 @. JOIN°T BOAR DS (GA RTHE ) •.••. PA TT ERSON.~~. ,/ .±._ -- ( CLA R K ) •••. BA TT I N •••• Y,, • V-.±__ -- RI MA ••••• 't~Q V -r __ (LANGL EY) •••• SA LT ARE LLI :J'IJS. ~----- DI STRIC T 2 1 '> (s -·--:vENS) •••• NEVI L .•••• !;"~.~.±:__ -- IE:)..{NG) •••••• CHAPU T •••• ~H-. _L !L.:::: -- ) •••• CLARK ••••• ~~. --lL. ...:!:___ __ L ANG ER) •••• ". FI NN ELL.·· ~~ '5-+----· FO X) •••••••• MAC-l<A IN •• '1.t"'-~ __ PATTERSON) .. GARTHE ••.• ~~. _i,.L .±___:__ __ •••••• SCOT T ••••• FY'. _lL -4::--__ PERRY •••• -~~~.o L/" ~ __ <woon) •• ROOT •••••• F'-! ~ .J::._ __ (PEREZJ •••••• TE MPL E .••• Off~ ~ .±..__ __ (DUTT ON) ••••• STEPHENSON '!ii! 4..1 ~ __ (DUNNE) •••••• WINN; ••••• Yf. ~ ±_ _._ DIST RIC T 3 . r~ , (MAC KA I ~ ) • • • F 0 X • • • • • • • '5f.l A. ....J.L __-::_ · __ (CLARK ) •••• BAT TI N •••• ~. -tfi-_±__ __ (SALES )\ ..... BL ACKMAN .. ? . --=· __ .(MEYERS J ••••• DAV I S •••.• 'P ?. -=:;::;z--.:.±:::_ __ Em'/ ARDS •• /~C_<.9 _L __:: __ (PATTERS·ON) •• GAR THE .••• ~L ~ +:- ~MATNEY) ••••• GRE EN •• · ••• tl v ...±::__ == ·) ko c:. I . / BRm'/N •••••• HY DE ••.•••••• -1L.._ ...t_ __ . (NU I JENS) MARSHO TT · .~+r~ -i.G-"---== --. PERRY ••.•• G~J-P - (FRA NK I EWI CH) ~O ..• ~i~ \./ ..±___ ==· ( ~·· "'D ) •• ROOT •••••• f!t; ~ ....±._ __ (H'O"'lLIND EN) •• SCOTT ••••• fY . ~-+­ (DUTTO N) ••••• STEPHENSON ·.A~J 7 a_,, == (ROB E R T~) •••• STEVE NS ••• ~:~·, ---:t-_. _ ( · J. .... BYRNE • • ~ _±__ __ DIST RIC T s· t z (CR OUL ) •••••• MC INNI S .• N . ~ ~ -- (BAKER) •••••• GL AR f< .'. ,<;-o(), ~_±_ -- KYMLA ••••• l'I .. ~ _ _:::::: -- DISTRICT 6 • ?... • .. PORTER ••• ,q'~'~ ~ ~ -·- (CLARK ) •••. BATT I N •••• ~({~_±::._ -- (MC I NN I S) ••• STOR E ••••• )'\.. --~ -- DI STRIC T 7 -~'t.Qr.--· U i, ~ ~PEREZ)····· ·J ACKMAt~ · ·°!;'-· --t?" +---. ~ ) • .. ·CLA RK · .. ••• .. -· ----- (GART HE) ·····PATTERSON ·~~· s:;::~ --· PORTER •.•• 0~~ c/ ~~ -· (B URTON ) .••.. ~t'Of{ •.• 1.~11. ~ ~-­ (MC IN NIS) •.• ~ •••• ~~. ~___:::-__ (LJI fl.JG LEY) .••. SALTARE LLI J"'i~. --____.::::::--·- ff ts"f RI CT J.l ~ I C~ATN~~~-. ·DUKE ······ · ~ .±.__ -- (CU\RK ) ••. ·BAKER ···· .V,,. • /27" :=-__ (MA T NEY) •..•• GI BBs ••.•• t: · -+--- DI STRICT 8 --·---- MITCH El_L· • • • • ------( ) •••••• CL /\R I< .••••. ______ _ HOL M········· -------· !LAN GER) •••••• FI NN ELL ••••• ~ __ · CLARK ) ••••• BAKER ••••••• ~ CLA RK ) ••••• BATTIN •••••• I./ __ . SA LE S) ••••••• BLACK~AN •••• ~ __ (EWI NG) ....... CHAPUT.::::: L/ -- ( ) ••••• CLA RK • • . • • . • t/ -- (MEYERS) ••••• DAVIS ••••••• ---c;-=== (MATNEY) •••••. DUKE •••••••• \./"' __ ED WAR DS ••••• -1.L_ __ · MAC KA I N) •••• FO X: •••••••• --1L_ __ PATTERS ON) ••• GARTHE •••••• ~ MATNEY) •••••• GIBBS ••••••• L../' -- MATNEY) •••••• GREEN ••••••• -::;::---. ~ L7'" -BRm~N ••••••• HYDE •••••••• ___ _ _ ••••••• SC 0 TT. • • • • • • vr · Fo x) ••••••••• MAC KA I N •••• l.7' -- MC I NN I S) •••• KYM L A. • .. • • • • L/'" ==-~ NUI JE NS) MARSHO TT •••• L-/" 1 CROUL) ••••••• MC I NNIS . • • • ~ -- STE VENS) •••• : NEVI L ••••••• L---"' == GARTHE) •••••• PA TTER SON ••• t.--/ . PERRY ••••••• ~ -- PO RTER •••••• -i..---- (BURTON) •••••• ~ •••• ·...Jc::::__ == RIMA •••••••• ~ .~FRANKi EWJ CH).~ •••.• -V--- MC INNIS)~ •• :~R.& .•••• ·==·== WOOD J •• ".ROO T. • • • • • • • ~ · LA NGLEY) SALTARELLI . ·--LL-=== (HOLLI NDEN) ••• SS~TT .•••••• · l/"" __ (PE R EZ )~ •••••• TchPLE •••••• _iL_ __ DUTT ONJ ~ •••• ,S TE PHE NSON •• ~ __ ROBERTS J "< •••• STEVE NS. : .•• .._.......... __ MC I NN I SJ ••• ,STORE ••••••• t.,./'" J BYRNE · ----.- . ....... ··~ -- DU NNE) ••••••• WINN ••••••• ·_LL __ ._ p ER EZ) I I I I I I I J~C KMAN I I I I . z:::7 -- OTHER S HARPER SY°LVESTER LE WIS DU NN CL ARKE TAYLOR B R0\1N NI SSON BLI SS BOETT NER CARL SO N F I NSTER GALL OWA Y HOHENER HO WAR D HUNT KE I TH KE NNEY L YNCH MA DDOX M.A.RT !NSON PIE RSA LL STEVEN S •• 3/1 3/74 JO I NT MEET I NG ( 4) C!1d..i.rman Finnel l welcomed new 1.Jlrec-cors r·"..'Om Orang;e , Brea and l :::v!ne. (6) Report of Joint Chairman Fin nell announced that Water Pric ing Committee meeting scheduled for March 20th at 5:00 p .m. had been cancelled . He then cal led a meet i ng of the Executive Committee for 5 :30 p.m ., Wed~es d ay ,, March 29t~, ~nd !n7!ted Directors MaoKain,·T~mplc & W.i.nt1 t o at tend. ' He also mentioned that two gent l emen who had given l ong years of ser vice were leaving the Board and enter t ained a motion fo r a r esolution of appreciation for Di rectors Just and Smith . It was so mo ved, s econded and carried . The motion was amended to include D ir ect~rs Kowalsk i , Roberts , Qu i g l ey and all other retiring Di r e ctors . (7) Repo r t of General Manager Mr . Harp er reported that the Musk i e Subcommittee on Air a n d Wate r wi ll be meeting in Honolulu next Monday for the purpose o f looking a t secondary treatment requirements in Hawaii. At the same time, wi ll b e considering amending the Act in this a r ea to include some of the othe r deep ocean dischargers . Sai d he talked to Lindsley Pa r sons , o u r Commissioner on SCCWRP and at his insistence , their Pr oject Di rector is going to go to the hearing on Monday and make some type of a presentation concerning discharges along the California coast . Said th i ngs seem to be moving and hopefully, will be hearing something in the rlext few weeks . Senator Stevens from Alaska has submitted an amen d ment to the Act g iving EPA Adminis~rator some f l exibility in aet e rmi ning degree of t reatment necessary . Said he had some bad news regarding the project rep ort for Improved Treatment at Plant No . 2 ($270 mill ion over next 10 years). Said Mr. Hu nt and he had visited Regio n a l Administrator of EPA on the 28th a n d took along report and EIS and discussed with them some of the f inancing problems, not just for ourselves but for whole state . Showe<i--them report and they said they would have to do an EIS which we a l so submitted . They said if they took our report and just put a cover on i t , i t would take six months a n d if they wr~te it , would t ake at least a year . We wi l l just have to wait . Sta:f is working on some type of a phasing program to go back to them ~~thin the next few weeks with a pro j ect not more than $20 millivn that will be going in the right direction but not getting too far ahead with BOD require ments. Otherwise wou l d be sitt ing here for a year . We complied with their rul es and then they said they have to do EIS . FAH also advised that Regional· Wa t er Qua l ity Control Board has give n us a tentative requirement for us to get our regional permi t and fo llow pretty much what the EPA and State r equirements a r e f or di scharge . Do have some problems , particularly with the amount of monitoring in ocean. Getting too much into the research area . Will b e a hearing on that on May 3rd . Hope to work with their s t aff and get someplace . Clark then asked , in view of what is happening in San Francisco the last couple days , do we see any possibility of anything lQke that happening in Orange County? Is it something we s hould start gearing for? Mr . Harp e r advised that he had gotten a call from Los Ange l es County Sanitation Districts . They have same u n ion as San Franc i sco . Didn 't believe this could happen and were concerned about it . With the setup we have now, we have a group of supervisors with which we feel we · could operate the facilities for a reasonable period of t i me . We do have a two-year agreement with employees with a provision for "no strikes", but feel we have enough supervisors to operate faciliti i:;;s. Root asked if EPA h a d any authority in that area a nd FAH answered they do b u t don 't know wh at t hey can do about i t. .(8) Repo rt of General Co unsel Nisson r epo rt ed that during the past month he sp ent some time ne got iating with the bonding company o f the contractor with which we a re having some t r ouble . Bonding c ompany stepped i n with enough rr.c::cy to complete coritract ci.uu meet commitments. Spent some time on Guide lines. Also new ones which will be in agenda ·n ext month . Don 't have anything pending so wil l h ave i t before next meeting . In District 3 have co llected co nnection charges from Green Valley No. 2 . Took a little nego t iati on and peaceful persuasion. Paid at 6:00 o 'cloc k the last day . Attended CASA conference wit h attorneys last F riday . Discussed guidelines and new legis l at i on whic h will requir e further revision of environmental guidelines . t8a) Smith introduced new Directors Joe Temple and Jim Jackman from Orange , and said a few words about enjoying having been here for the past six years. (10) EDP Committee Rep o rt Director Stevens reported that the Committee had completed their study and thanked Dir e ctors Root, Mcinnis and staf f for their work. Said they included rep o rt in minutes of Executive Committee. Didn 't send report directly because of postage cost . Summary covers it quite thoroughly . Then he introduced Jerry Peck a nd Ken Hanna . Added that regarding i tem 11 of agenda, th e Committee is 1 00% for adoption of that it e m . Ken Hanna the n gave his report. Sm ith asked for de finition of plant mo d e ls , and was answered it is try ing to identify points within operation .which would have an affec t on u l timate discharge . Basically , a matter of trying to evaluate impac t on that discharge . Re gard ing a ll fees, it was asked i f they were pretty much the same? Mr. Hanna advised that qu it e a few were outlined in r eport . Tried to identify them but not evaluate them. Does warrant further investigation . Was then asked if it would be bene ficial to have our cwn computer right about in the middle of the period? Savings wi ~h mini -computer in house was about $1 0 ,000 . $10 0,0 00 difference between inho use and outside . Finnell asked if they were advocating Batch(??) Said no , 'is ava i labl e but not advo cating anyone . Clark then stated that in view o f the fact that this was screened and recommended by the Executive Co mmit t ee , he moved items 3 & 4 and item No . 11 . Mo tion seconded and carried . ( 12) GC report re 'Conflict of Interests" Said h~ mailed package regarding this to Directors on Monday . Recommended that Directors adopt gui de lines sent out and said he wo uld answer any questions he cou ld. Directors would avail themselves of e videnc e of c ivil penalties in case anyo n e brings suit against the Districts b ased on Conflict of Interests Ac t . Robe r ts as k ed if there had been much talk ab 'Jt Nevada County throwing this out? Nisson said he didn!t wan t to predic t h ow this was goin g to come out . Said that those in favor of the Act state that by r eason of enactment of new bill, thfs will take e ff ect January 1, 197 5 . $250 gets just a stateme nt fr om your job. Just a d ec l arat i on of the intent of the o riginal Act . Attempted to patch up the existing Ac t by the new one . I n s tead o f a n eme r ge ncy Act , will take effect Janua ry 1st . Don 't think decision, even if approved, will throw Act out . -2- Finne l l r e fer red to page 2 , Sec t ion 2 , of t h e r e s o lut i on re ga r~i ng list o f p eop le d e s i g nate d as o ff icial s. Ex ec. Committe e recommending t h at it be b r o k e n d o1-1tn s e p a rat e l y for e a c h title o f JWS . Ky ml a a sked r ega r d i n g the Count y Auditor, i s t h e r P. Any t hjne i ~ th ~ body of law t n a ~ set us u p that we could a ppl y this to . Nissan answ e r ed t hat t he Act specifically names h im e x o ffici o audit o r for t h e Di stri c t. Hy d e t h en as ked h o w we enfo rc e i t sin c e he i s ex of fici o . Niss en s ai d n o t to confus e t he s e guid e line s with other guideline s that h e was not rec omm e ndin g as to declaration of fina n cial h oldin g s . Councilme n and s u pe r v i sor s wi l l have t o d o that in their o wn l o c a l e nt ity . See no p u r po s e i n t h at h e re . Smith as k e6 wh e n t h is should be filed? Nissen answered that if they accept Gene r a l Co u ns el's recommendat i o n, the y would not file discl o sure s ta t e me nt f or t he Di stri c t b ut fo r t h eir city in Ap ril. Duke then a s ked if t here was any particular reas o n why the General Counsel was l e ft o ff? Finnell said the r e was no s pe c ific reas on and thought we sh oul d a d d him. Is u p to Direc t ors. Can add or delete list . · Perry then st a ted t hat if they ad o pt this, r e commended t h at the General Coun sel be added as No . 7 o n the list. Motion was seconded and carried by voice vote . Winn as k ed what hap pen s if we don't adopt this? and Nissan replied nothing, the law is a State law. Don't have to adopt guidelines but "if you. don't and s o meone sues you and wins, wo uld b e subject to certain penalties described in letter. If court determines you hav e acted contrary to A ct~ penalties ma y be imp o sed up to three times the va l u~ of benefit received by the Act and you would forfeit your office. Winn then mo ved to take attorney 's recommendation and adopt resoluti9n, as a mended. Patterson commente d regarding the disclosure statement required of . officials wh o are fu ll time e mploy ee s such as tho se desi g nated in items 2 thr o ugh 7, s aid i n his city they h ave taken action to require disclosure ·not only of public officials, but also ful l time employees . in key personnel positions . Nissen replied that State l aw does not require it o f District officials. If yuu do add, will have to mak e it ·ror a l l pub li c offi c i als of Dist ~ictg . If you do that, is an additional penalty that might come into effect a nd that is if you requ ire discl o sure and fail to disclose an interest and you should fall into a lawsuit, could be fined three times the interest made. Patterson added that he thought that the l aw has probably got problems with this. Seems that top key personnel are subject to any discretion the same as elected ofr'icial s. Thoug ht that public disclosure o f this nature is very impor t ant and said he would like to so move that Nos . 2 thr o ugh 7 unde r Section 3600 be added to 3700 and, therefo r e , file public d is closure statements. F innell questioned that he was :eliminating No. 1 and Patterson answe~ed. yes. Finnell added that not all Directors servi ng here were council men or supervisors . Hyde stated that he only had to reveal what was within his city, not county, but here wo uld have to reveal county-wi de . Finnell then said he would like to get the amended motion cleared up. Patterson added t h at this should be referred to staff and report back at next meeting . Patterson then said he moved said disclosure including all p ub lic officials , Nos . 1 -7. portio n be added to resolutio n Motion seconded. Burton stated he just received information that night so would no t vote until he checked with his city attorney. -3- Smith the n asked, wh at if someone did not f ile in their city and th~ Distric t ass um e d that they had, does t hat affect District? Finnell answered that dis c l o sure wou l d be di f ferent anyway; would be coUnty- wide her e . Clar k callea ~or the ques~ion. Ro l l Call vote . Mcinnis indicated that the question wa s for t ot al Districts' business, so didn't feel decision could be made by i n dividual Districts . Nissan stated :that it has the 'effect of covering all Districts but has t o be d e cided by each District. Motion carried in Districts 1, 2, 3 & 11. Failed in Districts 5 , 6 & 7. (Amended motion) Chair e ntertained a ~oti o n on ~ai~ mo tion then (r esolution & guiJeli1,e&). It was so moved, seconded and carried . (Dists . 5,6 & 7) Baker the n asked, where are we?? and Nissan reiterated that the Directors in Districts 5, 6 & 7 do not·have to file disclosure statements for the Sanitation Districts and the other four Districts do. Nissen added t hat this should apply to mayors and alternates , wheth~r mayors serv e or not . Patterson then said his question first of al l , was what have we done wi th the staff? Nissan answered that the same disclosure wou l d be i n effect. Can't disclude any area. Finnell added wi ll have to do i t within confines of joint Districts. (13a) REL Report re JPL Study Ray Lewis reported that the JPL process was one whereby s l udge is converted into activated carbon and reintroduced into sewage stream for clarification. Packet in Directors ' folders shows some of the pict~res taken here at Plant 1 . Also are pictures taken at four levels of clarification and process and are tables of results on var i ous levels of process to us. Recent resul ts indicate that we can perhaps meet our requirements at a substant i a l reduction of anticipated costs. Original ly required $275 mi llion for expansion at Pla~t 2 . If this process works as it appears~ wi l l reduce that substantially but don 't know how much at this t i me . This project has been funded by NASA. Said he would like to recommend to Boar d that financial assistance be authorized to further improve p i lot p lant that we have and we will be able to prepare an applicati on for a d e monstrat i on grant for proof of this on a p l ant -size sca l e . Referred to item 14 where Dr. Fletcher has asked staff to appear to pres~nt our case as far as regul ati6ns are concerned and advance tecb~olo~y that can be used and what can be offered as far as meet i ng the0e requirements. Also contemplating the first part of Apri l an institute to review th i s process wi th State people and Wash i ngton people, etc. Hope to say we can meet requirements a t a reduced cost ·and much sooner than anticipated . Much l ower overall ope r ating cost . Staff is requesting that the Boards allow $1 0,000 to secure the help of the JPL personnel for addi t ional supplies and a l so to utilize our lab personnel for a three to four week p r ogram here to accumulate more data in order that a project report o r draft report to s 11bmit for a demonstration grant could be made. NASA has come up with a little more money to extend the i r p i lot work here and we wou l d like to participate from a staff level . It was so moved and seconded. Hyde ~tated he thought it was a · good idea but just wante d to know what the f i nal product was and its use . Ray answered they have a two step clarifier. He briefly exp l ained process and said there was a 20 -25% ash problem to be disposed of. Was asked how they got r id of ash and he answered by -disposal. Hyde then asked how much of a grant we were expecting and Ray answered perhaps one ha l f mil l ion o r more . Motion carried. -4- ·c 16iJ EIR for Improved Treatment at Plant 2 REL advised that project report referred t o was fo r $275 million to take care of effluent discharge req u iremen ts _to the year 198 5 and EIR was part of project report submitted. Commended Kris Lindstrom for many l ong h o u rs work~ng with co~s ulta nt . Feel that fina l repor t is a good report and has been prepare d in ac cordance with g uide lines of SWRCB. Answers questions of short t e rm and long term effects. Major con c ern was quality of effluent. Need t o proc eed with our public hearing so final report can be submit.ted . Clark then moved items b & c. Mot ion seconded and carried. Chaput then st ated , regarding Santa Ana River Intercept or, have been told that it is going to have 30 MGD capacity and EIR said 35 MGD. Why the difference? Ray explained that the 30 MGD is the Upper Basin capacity. That is capacity at County boundary . At intersection of La Palma and Grove Street wh ere Reach 3 ties into line will have 5 MGD additional capacity for growth re quired by District 2 . 5 MGD goes in increments from County boundary . Chaput then said he did not see report that was prepared at the same time as EIR . FAH replied that they were recommending that District 2 have an adjourned meeting sometime next month and will send re por ts to Directors then . (39) DI ST. 7 Other Business Sal tarelli stated that since District 7 voted against the resolution concerning "Conflict of Interests" legislation, he would like to move that the staff be directed to prepare a resolution to send to the State Assembly and State Senate indicating that we oppose their excluding themselve~ from this "Conflict of Interests" Act . Mo t io n. was seconded . Clark asked Nissan for his comments on this motion and Nissan said he had no comment. Saltarelli reiterated that what he was saying wa s that t hey should amend this bill to include themse l ves within the parame t ers of this l egislation . Thought all Directors should do resolution in their own cities . Called for the que stion . Voi~e vote . Motion carried . (52) DIST . 2 Other business Nevil stated we srould have an opinion from the legal counsel regarding opinions on annexations with reference to supreme court decision that affected LAFC . Would like to have report of the Counsel by the next meeting as to how that would affect the Sanitation Districts. (???) Ni sson said he will prepare an opinion. Also , it was mov e d & seconded that District 2 be added i n support of the resolution that Distr ic t 7 is proposing . Motion carried . (61) DIST . 3 Other bus~ness Moved & seconded to add Di s trict 3 to resolution to State Assembly & State · Senate . Motion carried . Hyde stated he wanted it recorded that he voted no on that motion. It was then me ntione d that a fter the l as t Board meeting , fo und that there were some people there that weren 't ab l e t o speak a t public hearing in Dist . 3 because of the l e n gth of the meeting and they had left by the time the item came up . Had -stated in notice that public hearing was ·.to b e at 8 : 00 and suggested that i n the f ut ur e should hold it at time stated to ma ke it mor e convenient fo r t hes e people . Finne ll said if the re h a d b ee n a numb e~ o f people there , would have moved it up, but was a goo d po int and would do so f r om now on . • __.-<-> Perry then asked Finnell about ap point i ng Committ ee discussed in exec. session & he said he would appoint next month . -5- .f:~XCF.RPTS FROM rrHF '·ifNU'TE~:. 1.JF THE P~GULAR J OIN'.1.' MEETING OF THE , · '')S 01'' DJ ; .1~CTORS OF COUNTY SANrl'JU.'JJlN DISTI\ICTS Vi l_. -2, j, 5, -.6; 7 and 11, OF uRANu.8 GU ti 1 '. . ') c: \LJ..~\-ihNl.H. A regular joint iueeting of the Boards of Di.rectors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, Ca.liforn1a., was held at the hour of 7: 30 p .m., March 13 _., 19 7 4 , 10844 Ell.:_ s Avenue, Fountain Valley, Califor:nia. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and-the Secretary reported a quorum pres~nt for each District's Board. * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of. Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 5:30 p.m., April 3, 1974. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:17_p.m.~ March 13, 1974 . • STATE OF CALIFORNIA~ SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE .. I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange C6unty, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true a.nd correct copy of_ minute entri.es on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 13th day of March· 19 74 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereun~//, set my hand this 14th day of March, 197 ~. S-107 Bocrds of Dirc:ctol's tion Districts No3. 7, and 11 EXCERPTS FROM rrHE MINU11 ES OF rrIIE HEGULAR JOIN'l1 MEE'l1ING OF THE BOAHDS OF' DifillC~rORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DIS'l'IUCTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, OF ORANGE COU~TY, CALIFGRNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of OrDnge County, California, was held at the hour of 7~30 p.m., March 13 , 19 74 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, Califo1:nia. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and-the Secretary reported a quorum pres~nt for each District's Board. * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 2 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of. Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 5:30 p.m., April 3, 1974. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:17_p.m.~ March 13, 1974. STATE OF CALIFORNIA~ SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J. WAYNE SYLVES'I1ER_, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange C6unty, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true a.nd correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 13th day of March· 19 74 14th S-107 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have day of March, 19 7 4. ' this COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5 2 6 2 7 2 AND 11 DISTRICT NO. 1 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 2 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 3 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 5 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 6 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 7 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 11 Directors present: MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING March 13, 1974 -7:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California ROLL CALL Jerry Patterson (Chairman), Robert Battin, Kerm Rima, and Donald Saltarelli None Robert Nevil (Chairman), Dale Chaput, Ralph Clark, Robert Finnell, Leonard MacKain, John Garthe, George Scott., Bob Perry, Robert Root, Joe Temple, and Donald Winn Mark Stephenson Donald Fox (Chairman), Robert Battin, Thomas Blackman, Jesse Davis, Roland Edwards, John Garthe, Jack Green, Joseph Hyde, Frank Marshott, Bob Perry, Alice Frankiewich, Robert Root, George Scott, Charles Stevens, Jr., and Edward Byrne Mark Stephenson Don Mcinnis (Chairman), Ralph Clark, and Carl Kymla None Ellis Porter (Chairman), Robert Battin, and John Store None Donald Saltarelli (Chairman pro tern) John Burton, Ralph Clark, James Jackman, Don Mcinnis, Jerry Patterson, and Ellis Porter None Henry Duke (Chairman), David Baker, and Norma Gibbs 3/13/74 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary, Ray Lewis, William Clarke, Doug Preble, Kris Lindstrom, and Rita Brown Ce Arthur Nissen, General Counsel, Carolyn Ewing, Tom Kowalski, Don Smith, Conrad Hohener, Walt Howard, \_,/ Harvey Hunt, Donald Martinson, Ken Hanna, Jerry Peck, Sam Peterson, and Robert Webber A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7; and 11 of Orange County, California, was held at 7:30 p.m. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation, the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District's Board. * * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Appointment of Chairman pro tern That Director Saltarelli be appointed· Chairman pro tern, the office of Chairman having been vacated by retiring Director Don Smith. DISTRICTS Excerpts re Board appointments received and filed Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Minute Excerpts from the Cities of Brea and Orange be received and ordered filed; and that the following representatives be seated as members of the Boards: CITY ACTIVE ALTERNATE DIST. NO. Brea Leonard MacKain Donald Fox 2 Orange Joe H. Temple James A. Jackman Jess F. Perez " 2 7 DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held February 13, 1974, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held February 13, 1974, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held February 13, 1974, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held February 13, 1974, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held February 13, 1974, be approved as mailed. -2- 3/13/74 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held February 13, 1974, and the adjourned regular meeting held February 26, 1974, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held February 13, 1974, be approved as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman Temple and Winn to attend ALL DISTRICTS Expressing appreciation for the services of retiring Directors Joint.Chairman Finnell called a meeting of the Executive Committee for 5:30 p.m., Wednesday, March 29, 1974, and invited Directors MacKain, and participate in the discussions. Following the report of the Joint Chairman, it was moved, seconded, and carried by unanimous acclamation: That the Boards of Directors adopt the following Resolutions expressing their appreciation for the services of retiring Directors: Director Resolution No. Edward Just 74-45 Don Smith 74-47 Henry Roberts, Jr. 74-49 E. Ray Quigley 74-50 Cor Vanderwaal 74-51 Certified copies of these resolutions are attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager Mr. Harper reported that the Senate Subcommittee on Air and Water, chaired by Senator Muskie, was scheduled to meet in Hawaii next week for the purpose of reviewing secondary treatment requirements in that. State. At the same time, they will be considering amendments to the Act which would allow the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the flexibility of determining the degree of treatment required of deep ocean discharges. Commissioner Pa·rsons, the Districts' representative on the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority, has advised that the Authority's Project Director will present testimony at the hearing concerning their findings on the effect of discharges along the Southern California coast. The General Manager reported that the Project Report and Environmental Impact Statement for Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 had been submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and the Environmental Protection Agency. The Regional EPA Administrator's office has advised that because of the scope of the work, EPA would also have to prepare an Environmental Impact Report which will take from six months to a year. -3- 3/13/74 Our staff is presently developing a staging of project phases in order that we may proceed in an orderly manner with facilities for improved treatment, yet not commit the Districts to unnecessary expenditures, pending final determination of discharge requirements by the regulatory agencies. Mr. Harper also advised that the Regional Water Quality Control Board had submitted tentative requirements for the Districts in connection with issuance of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit required under the 1972 Act. Of primary concern to our staff under the proposed regulations are the excessive monitoring requirements. A hearing on the permit is scheduled for May 3rd. In response to a question from Directors regarding recent sanitation employees' strikes in other areas of the State, the General Manager advised the Boards that we currently have a two-year wage and benefits agreement with the Employees' Association. However, in the event the Districts would experience a walkout or strike by operational employees, our facilities could be operated by supervisory personnel for a reasonable period of time and thereby avoid pollution of our beaches. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Counsel The General Counsel reported that during the past month he had spent considerable time on arranging for the bonding company on Job No. P2-20, Power Reliability as the contractor Project at Plant No. 2, to take over the job had encountered financial difficulties. Mr. Nissen reported that the developer for Green Valley Number Two (Holstein Industries) had paid previously disputed connection fees to District No. 3, therefore eliminating the need for a lawsuit. The Counsel attended a meeting of the Attorneys Committee of the California Association of Sanitation Agencies to discuss necessary changes in Districts' guidelines, and new guidelines, required as a result of recent legislation. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file written report of Executive Committee Following a brief report by Vice Joint Chairman Porter, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the written report of the Executive Committee dated March 4, 1974, be received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive 2 file, and approve report of Special Committee on Feasibility of Electronic Data Processing System Director Stevens, Chairman of the Special Committee on Feasibility of Electronic Data Processing System, reported that the consultant engaged by the Boards to conduct an EDP Feasibility study had completed their report, a summary of which had been furnished each Director with the February Executive Committee minutes. Mr. Stevens expressed his appreciation to Committeemen Root and Mcinnis for their work and advised Directors that the consultant's report had been reviewed with the Executive Committee, and that the Executive Committee concurs with the Special Committee that the recommendati~s contained in the study be implemented. Director Stevens then introduced Messrs. Jerry Peck and Ken Hanna of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. who reviewed their report and recommendations for the members of the Boards. -4- 3/13/74 The Board then entered into a brief discussion of the report and recommendations, after which it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Report to the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County on a Data Processing Feasibility Study and Implementation Plan, dated February, 1974, submitted by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., be received, ordered filed, and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That implementation of the recommendations contained in said plan be authorized, as recommended by the Special Committee on Feasibility of Electronic Data Processing System and the Executive Committee; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be authorized to request a consulting proposal to assist the staff in implementation of the data processing plan. ALL DISTRICTS Adopting guidelines for the implementation of the Governmental Conflicts of Interest Act Mr. Nissen briefly reviewed his written analysis of the Governmental Conflicts of Interest Act as it applies to the County Sanitation Districts and his memorandum and recommendations of March 11, 1974, which he had previously mailed to Directors. The General Counsel recommended that the Boards adopt the proposed guidelines forwarded with his memorandum to avail themselves of the immunities of certain civil penalties should any Director be sued under the Act. Mr. Nissen pointed out that in addition to the members of the Boards of Directors, the proposed guidelines applied to the General Manager, Chief Engineer, Secretary of the Boards and Director of Finance of the Joint Administrative Organization, and the County Auditor acting as ex-officio auditor of the Districts. The Boards then entered into a lengthy discussion concerning the Governmental Conflicts of Interest Act, the disclosure provision of the Act and the propriety of adopting guidelines. During the discussion, the General Counsel answered numerous questions posed by the Directors, after which the following actions were taken: ALL DISTRICTS Adding General Counsel to list of officials subject to guidelines guidelines. DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3 2 & 11 Adopting guidelines for implementation of Governmental Conflicts of Interest Act Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the General Counsel be added to the list of officials designated under Section 2 of the proposed Following a motion and a second to approve the General Counsel's recommenda- tion to adopt the proposed guidelines, as amended, a substitute motion was then offered and seconded to adopt Resolution No. 74-52, adopting guide- lines for the implementation of the Governmental Conflicts of Interest Act, as further amended by the addition of a disclosure provision as follows: "Each of the public officials named in Section 2 above shall, during the month of April in each year and within thirty (30) days after ceasing to hold public office, file verified statements con- taining the information described in Government Code Section 3700(b) with the Clerk of the County of Orange. It is the intent of this section to make the pro- visj ons of Chapter 11 of Di vision 4. 5 of Title 1 of the Government Code applicable to public officials of this District." -5- 3/13/74 Following a roll call vote, the General Counsel advised that the resolution, as amended, had been adopted by the Boards of Directors of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 11; and had failed to pass in Districts Nos. 5, 6, and 7. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 5, 6, & 7 Adopting guidelines for implementation of Governmental Conflicts of Interest Act The Chair then called for a vote on the original motion to adopt conflicts of interest guidelines, as recommended by the General Counsel, excluding a disclosure provision, whereupon it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors of Districts Nos. 5, 6, and 7 adopt Resolution No. 74-53, adopting guidelines for the implementation of the Governmental Conflicts of Interest Act. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Director Burton stated that he had not had an opportunity to review the Counsel's recommendation and, therefore, abstained from voting. ALL DISTRICTS Approving amendments to Districts' Uniform Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Districts' Uniform Guidelines Implementing the California Environ- mental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, be further amended to conform with recent changes in State regulations, as recommended by the General Counsel; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager and General Counsel be authorized to file an approved copy of said amended guidelines with the Secretary of the District. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing participation with JPL on reactivated carbon wastewater treatment process experimentation The Chief Engineer reported that preliminary results from the experimental reactivated carbon improved wastewater treatment process being conducted at the Districts' facilities by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) of Cal Tech appears very promising. The research to date indicates that a substantial reduction in· capital and operating costs may be realized by the Districts if the process proves successful on a plant-scale basis. To this point, the JPL work has been funded by NASA, and Mr. Lewis recommended that the Boards consider authorizing financial participation by the Districts to extend the pilot project to enable preparation of an application for a demonstration grant for a plant-scale experimental program. Following a brief discussion, it was then moved, seconded, and duly carried: That participation with Jet Propulsion Laboratory of Cal Tech in their experimental pilot project for reactivated carbon improved wastewater treatment process be authorized in an amount not to exceed $10,000. -6- 3/13/74 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Authorizing staff member's appearance before Joint That the General M~nager be authorized Senate and House Committee to designate one staff member to appear in Washington 1 D.C. before the Joint Senate and House Committee on Science and.Astronautics in Washington, D.C., when scheduled, to present the local sewering ~ agencies' viewpoints on reactivated carbon improved wastewater treatment process, as requested by Dr. Fletcher of NASA; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging, and incidental expenses incurred in connection with ~aid appearance is hereby authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Requesting change of interpretation of the FWPCA Amendments of 1972 re ad valorem taxes and industrial cost recovery Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 74-39, requesting interpretation of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, and the rules and regulations implementing said act, to allow any revenue producing system (including ad valorem taxes) that accomplishes an equitable distribution of costs among users as deemed to meet the require- ments of the act, and allow industrial cost recovery from all industries within the applicant's jurisdiction; and directing copies of said resolution be forwarded to Orange County's congressional delegation, members of the House and Senate Public Works Committees, and the Environmental Protection Agency. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file Draft Environmental Impact Report for Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 Following a brief review of the Environmental Impact Report for Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 by the Chief Engineer, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Draft Environmental Impact Report for Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, dated March, 1974, prepared by Richard Terry & Associates/Environmental Science & Services, with the assistance of the Districts' staff, be received and ordered filed; and that the staff be directed to file a Notice of Completion and Notice of Intent in accordance with the Local Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and that April 25, 1974, be established as the date for which all comments must be received on said Environmental Impact Report. Following comments on capacity provided in the Districts' system for the upper Santa Ana River Basin, it was reported that District No. 2 was scheduled to have an adjourned meeting to review the Santa Ana River Interceptor Project. ALL DISTRICTS Fixing public hearing date for consideration of Draft EIR for Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 Plant No. 2 on April 3, to conduct said hearing Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That April 3, 1974, be fixed as the date for an informal public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for Improved Treatment at 1974, and that the staff be authorized at the Districts' administrative offices. -7- 3/13/74 ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 3 to plans and specifications for Job No. Pl-9-1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Additional Secondary Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-9-1, authorizing an addition of $10,542.62 and granting an extension of time of 137 calendar days to the contract with James E. Hoagland & Hoagland Engineering, a Joint Venture, be approved. Copy of this Change Order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 2 to plans and specifications for Job No. J-4-1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Increased Water Reuse Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-4-1, authorizing an addition of $3,194.00 and granting an extension of time of 159 calendar days to the contract with F. T. Ziebarth and Ziebarth & Alper, a Joint Venture, be approved. Copy of this Change Order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approving assignment of funds re Job No. P2-20 That the Assignment dated March 5, 1974, from Mel Gorham Electric Company, Contractor for Power Reliability Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-20, to Industrial Indemnity Company, bonding company for said project, of remaining funds due contractor on said job, be received, ordered filed, and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Accepting Job No. Pl-9-1 as complete Following removal from the consent calendar at the request of the staff,'-"" it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 74-40, accepting Additional Secondary Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-9-1, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Convene in executive session ALL DISTRICTS Reconvene in regular session ALL DISTRICTS Amending Positions and Salaries Resolution on items considered in executive cowJnittee At 8:55 p.m., the Boards convened in executive session to consider personnel matters. At 9:07 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 74-54, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 71-3, as amended, approving salary adjustment for the position of General Manager. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -8- ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file staff progress report on Treatment Plant Construction Projects and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Certification of the General Manager received and ordered filed 3/13/74 Moved, seconded,-and duly carried: That the staff progress report dated March 7, 1974, on Treatment Plant Construction Projects be received Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the certification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment, be received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried by roll call vote: Approval of Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant books That the Districts' Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant books be approved for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay: Joint Operating Capital Outlay Revolving $101,691.51 475,317.54 $577,009.05 in accordance with the warrants listed on pages "I-1" through "I-4", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:10 p.m., March 13, 1974. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of warrants That the District's Operating Fund warrant book be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $304.30, in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:10 p.m., March 13, 1974. DISTRICT 6 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:10 p.m., March 13, 1974. -9- 3/13/74 DISTRICT 7 Directing staff to prepare plans and specifications for Contract No. 7-1-R Contract No. 7-1-R. DISTRICT 7 Ordering annexation of territory to the District (Annexation No. 35) Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff be authorized and directed to prepare plans and specifications for Repairs to Gisler Trunk (Infiltration Reduction), Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 74-41-7, ordering annexation of approximately 15 acres to the District in the vicinity of Santiago Boulevard, Ryals Lane and Avenida Palamar in the City of Orange (Proposed Annexation No. 35 -Tract No. 8235 to County Sanitation District No. 7). Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of warrants That the District's Operating Fund warrant book be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay: Operating Fund Fixed Obligation Fund $ 165.50 10,000.00 $10,165.50 in accordance with the warrants listed on page "III", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 2 3 3) & 7 Adopting resolution concerning Governmental Conflicts of Interest Act for transmittal to State Assembly and Senate Following comments by the Chairman of District No. 7 regarding exclusion by the legislature of State Assemblymen and Senators from the provisions of the Governmental Conflicts of Interest Act, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors of Districts Nos. 2, 3, and 7 adopt Resolution No. 74-55, in form prepared by the General Counsel, objecting to the exclusion of State legislators from the pro- visions of the Governmental Conflicts of Interest Act; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said resolution be forwarded to the Presiding Officer of the State Senate and the Speaker of the Assembly. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Director Hyde requested that his vote in opposition to the resolution be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 7 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. '-"' The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:12 p.m., March 13, 1974. -10- DISTRICT 11 Authorizing initiation of proceedings re Annexation No. 17 3/13/74 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 74-42-11, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 3.55 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Warner Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway Alternate (Annexation No. 17 -Balsa Chica State Beach Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 11.) Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of Suspense Fund warrants That the Districts' Suspense Fund warrant book be approved for signature of the Chairman of District No. 3, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $304.30, in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of warrants That the District's Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund warrant book be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authdrized and directed to pay $86,959.35, in accordance with the warrants listed on page "III", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 11 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:13 p.m., March 13, 1974. DISTRICT 2 Approving Change Order No. 12 to plans and specifications for Contract No. 2-14-1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 12 to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, authorizing an addition of $7,995.06 to the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting Company, be approved. Copy of this Change Order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Receive, file, and reject claim for personal injuries re Contract No. 2-14-1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the claim for Personal Injuries submitted by Henry Stone and Jerry Butler in the amount of $500,000, in connection with construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, be received and ordered filed, and that said claim be rejected on the basis that it is an improperly prepared claim and is defective as to form in that there is no entity entitled "Sanitation District of Orange County", as recommended by the General Counsel. -11- 3/13/74 DISTRICT 2 Accepting Grant of Easement from Orange County Water District re Contract No. 2-14-2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 74-43-2, authorizing acceptance of Grant of Easement from Orange County Water District for a permanent easement in connection with construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Katella Avenue to La Palma~ Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-2, at no cost to the District. Certified- copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Authorizing initiation of annexation proceedings re Annexation No. 9 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 74-46-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 8.251 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Prospect Avenue and Collins Avenue in the City of Orange (Annexation No. 9 -Tract No. 8399 to County Sanitation District No. 2). Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Receive and file staff progress report re Contracts Nos. 2-14-1 and 2-14-2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff progress report dated March 7, 1974, on construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, and the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-2, be received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of warrants That the District's Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund warrant book be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $396,020.03, in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Requesting legal opinion re EIR's relative to annexations Chairman Nevil requested that the General Counsel submit a legal opinion at the next regular meeting of the Board regarding the pos~ible requirement of submitting Environmental , Impact Reports in connection with annexations to the District. DISTRICT 2 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to April 3, 1974, at 5:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:17 p.m., March 13, 1974. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Receive and file minute excerpt and letter from That the minute excerpt from the ~ cities of Buena Park and City of Buena Park dated February 19, Westminster re Contract 3-20 1974, and the letter from the City of Westminster dated February 27, 1974, approving alignment of the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5, 6, 7 and 8, Contract No. 3-20, be received and ordered filed. -12- DISTRICT 3 Approving Change Order No. 3 to plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-17 3/13/74 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 & 3, Contract No. 3-17, authorizing an addition of $38,627.33 to the contract with J. ·F. Shea Company, be approved. Copy of this Change Order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Approving Change Order No. 4 to plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-17 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 & 3, Contract No. 3-17, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities to the contract with J. F. Shea Company, be approved. Copy of this Change Order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Approving Change Order No. 5 to plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-17 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: ·That Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 & 3, Contract No. 3-17, granting an extension of time of 104 calendar days to the contract with J. F. Shea Company, be approved. Copy of this Change Order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Accepting Contract No. 3-17 as complete That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 74-44-3, accepting the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 & 3, Contract No. 3-17, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion upon receipt of letters of compliance from agencies issuing permits in connection with said contract; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Receive, file, and deny claim for personal injuries re Contract No. 3-18 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the claim for personal injuries submitted by Kenneth C. Young dated February 25, 1974, in the amount of $100,000 in connection with construction of the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18, be received, ordered filed, and denied, as recommended by the General Counsel. DISTRICT 3 Receive and file draft Environmental Impact Report Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft Environmental Impact Report for Imperial Relief Interceptor Sewer, Reaches 22 and 23, be received and ordered filed; and that the action of the staff in filing of Notice of Completion in accordance with the Local Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, be ratified; and, FURTHER MOVED: That March 20, 1974, be established as the date for which all comments must be received on said Environmental Impact Report. -13- 3/13/74 DISTRICT 3 Receive and file staff progress report re Contract No. 3-18 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff progress report dated March 7, 1974, on construction of the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18, be received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of warrants That the District's Operating Fund and Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund warrant books be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay: Operating Fund Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund $ 445.00 1851019.20 $1851464.10 in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Adjournment seconded, and duly carried: Following a brief discussion regarding agenda procedures in connection with public hearings, it was moved, That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:22 p.m., March 13, 1974. -14- WARRANT NO. 22339 22340 ·?2341 ~~342 c2343 22344 . 22345 . 22346 22347 ' 22348 22349 22350 22351 22352 22353 22354 22355 22356 22357 22358 22359 22360 22361 22362 22363 22364 22365 22366 ~367 ~2368 22369 22370 22371 22372 22373 22374 22375 22376 22377 22378 22379 ' 22380 22381 22382 • 22383 22384 22385 22386 22387 22388 22389 22390 ?391 ~392 22393 22394 22395 22396 22397 22398 22399 22400 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARilANTS IN FAVOR OF Abaco Packaging Corp., Containers Advanced Electronics, Batteries Air Conditioning Supply Co., Freight Al's Tree Service, Trees Topped All Bearing Service, Inc., Belts Allied Supply Co., Valves American Chain & Gear Co., Pum~ Parts American Compressor Co., Compressor Parts American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Technical Manuals American Lock & Supply, Inc., Hardware City of Anaheim, Power Anchor Packing Co., Pump Packing Apco Supply, Electric Supplies Appliance Refinishing Co., Refinish Equipment Arrow Glass & Mirror Co., Office Partitions Barksdale Controls Division, Controls Barnes Delaney, Engine Parts Bearing Specialty Co., Pump Parts Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair Benner Sheet Metal, Inc., Fabricating Blower Paper Co., Janitorial Supplies Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams Broadlick Art Supply, Drafting Supplies C & R Reconditioning Co., Engine Repair Cal-Glass for Research, Inc., Lab Supplies California Auto Collision, Inc., Truck Repair California Collator Sales, Binding Supplies Certified Laboratories, Solvents College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials Commercial & C.B. Communications, Co~muni~ation Equipment Consolidated Elect. Distr., Electric Supplies & Conduit (MO 1-9-74) Consolidated Reproductions, Printing Constructors Supply Co., Tools & Hardware Control Specialists, Inc., Regulator Copeland Motors, Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa County"Water District, Wat~r Mr. Crane, Crane Rental Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage Curtin Matheson Scientific, Lab Supplies D & C Concrete Pumping Service, Concrete Pumping c. R. Davis Supply Co., Fire Hose John M. Deck, Engine & Equipment Parts Deckert Surgical Co., First Aid Supplies Marvin E. Derfler Co., Pump Parts Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling Don's Schwinn Cyclery, Bicycles Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies & Printing Elect Air Tool Co., Incinerator Parts Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Hesearch & Monitoring (MO 12-14-66) Engineers Sales Service, Inc., Pump Parts Ensign Products Company, Lubricant Enterprise Printing Co., Printing Supplies Envirotech Corp., Pump Parts Envirotech -Sparling, Meter Repair Fischer & Porter Co., Regulator & Chlorine Parts Foss Company, Foam City of Fountain Valley, Water Reimbursement Fee William H. Fox, Employee Mileage France Products, Compressor & Parts Fredson, Equirnnent Parts Preewoy Hacl1:.!_nc &:, Helding, Machining Garden Grove Lumber & Cement Co., Building Materials I-1 AMOUNT 33.71 50 . 40 18.96 1,995.00 82.40 489.30 119. 59 186.46 52.50 42.79 20.70 88.20 47.41 116.00 1,088.0Q 593.18 1,596.00 201.23 81.95 152.25 248.32 26.00 28.58 655.00 19.61 207.94 75.63 164.45 446.39 111.55 2,667.66 21.14 260.91 458.96 16.43 6.o·o 1,283.51 52.26 in.,94 45.00 905.68 40.19 56 .57 114.71 374.00 174.28 640.46 109. l·Q l,8~YLOO 173.46 278.60 70.08 164.88 106.29 2,066.92 42.QO 693.31 27.30 713.55 19.99 335.6) 869.42 WARRANT NO. 22401 22402 22403 22404 22405 22406 22407 22408 22409 22410 22411 22412 22413 22414 22415 22416 22417 22418 22419 22420 22!~21 22422 22423 22424 22425 22426 22427 22428 22429 22430 22431 22432 22433 22434 22435 22436 22437 22438 22439 22440 22441 22442 22443 22444 22445 22446 22447 22448 22449 22450 22451 22452 22453 22454 22455 22456 22457 22458 22459 22460 22461 22462 22463 22Ll6ll 22465 IN FAVOR OF General Electric Co., Electric Supplies General Electric Supply Co., Electric Supplies General Telephone Co. Georgia Pacific, Building Materials Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine {Contract 1-1-73) Golden West Fertilizer Co., Grit Removal Graybar Electric Co., Electric Supplies Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Parts & Repair Halsted & Hoggan, Inc., Pump Parts Harbor Fire Protection, Fire Extinguisher Service Hardware Systems Co., Lab Supplies Hardy & Harper, Inc., Paving Charles G. Hardy, Inc., Hardware Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal Hersey Products, Inc., Valves Honeywell, Inc., Controls, Strip Charts & Meter Repair Howard Supply Co., Pipe Supplies (MO 1-9:..74) City of Huntington Beach, Water Inland Nut & Bolt Co.,. Hardware International Business Machines, Maintenance Agreement Jensen Instrument Co., Controls Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies & Fittings King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, Belts & Boiler Parts Kleen Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware. Koppl Company, Piping LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tools & Hardware L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Service The Lacal Company, Inc., Cleaner Lewco Electric Company, Pump Repair & Truck Parts A. J. Lynch Company, Trawl Containers R. W. McClellan & Sons~ Inc., Paving Materials John McCullough, Employee Mileage M B Industrial Supply, Hardware Metropolitan Supply Co., Gauges E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers B. Jean Mosher, Employee Mileage Nashua Corp., Reproduction Supplies National Lumber & Supply, Inc., Building Materials Nelson-Dunn, Inc., Engine Parts City of Newport Beach, Water c. Arthur Nissen, General Counsel Retainer Occidental College, Ecological Boat Charter City of Orange, Water Orange County Boiler & Industrial Repair, Freight Orange County Chemical Co., Chemicals Orange County Stamp Co., Office Supplies Orange County Wholesale Electric, Switches Pacific Telephone Co. Ron Parker, Employee Mileage Norman Parsons, Employee Mileage Polaris Battery Co., Batteries Porter Boiler Service, Inc., Boiler Parts Postmaster, Postage Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage Quikspray, Inc., Pump Radio Products Sales, Inc., Meter Supplies Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal Red Valve Company, Inc., Freight The Register, Annual Subscription Gordon E. Reid Drafting, Drafting Services Republic Supply Co. of Calif., Hardware Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Parts SGA Scientific, Inc., Lab Suppliea Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing & Drafting Supplies I-2 AMOUNT 141.77 791.11 1, 2·J7. J5 822.53 4,496.73 2,208~ 293.0~ 202.J3 489.83• 29 .93· 186.07 285.0J 4 144.08 140.0::> 52.03 458.99 6,517.27 17.03 1,444.85 12.82 277.25 1,124.58 159. 41 281.53 97.72 511.43 371.57 1,722.10 47.39 71.10 146 'l 448~ 110.16 7.88 289.28 2,018.69 21. 75 118.31 61.04 36.6C> 399.99 800.00 375.0J 29.19 16 .45; 75.29. 7.46 84. 53• 462.41 15.6C> 6.30 322.01 32.61 500.00 49.14 1, 197 •,..I 23.~ 4J.OJ 14. 75 33.0::> 136.0J 38.12 113.93 82.7J 185.35 WARRANT NO. 22466 22467 22468 22469 ~2470 ~471 22472 22473 22474 -22475 22476 .. 22477 22478 22479 22480 22481 22482 22483 22484 22li85 22486 22Li87 22488 22489 22490 22491 22492 22493 22494 ?2495 ~496 ~2l197 22498 22499 22500 22501 22502 22503 22504 22505 22506 22507 22508 22509 ' 22510 . 22511 22512 • 22513 IN FAVOR OF Santa Ana· Electric Motors, Elect. Motor & Motor Rewind $ Santa Ana Electronics Co., Electronic Supplies Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies City of Seal Beach, Water Security Industrial Supply Co., Flanges Shaw Pump & Supply, Inc., Pump & Pump Parts Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies A. H. Shipkey, Inc., Truck Tires John Sigler, Employee Mileage Fred Sinasek, Employee Mileage Smith Optical Service, Safety Glasses So. Cal Sign Co., Sign South Orange Supply, Pump Parts Southern California Edison Company Southern California Gas Company Southern California Water Company Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water Speed-E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Stanco Mfg. & Sales, Inc., Truck Repair Standard Concrete Material, Inc., Concrete Standard Oil Company, Gasoline & Oil Stang Hydronics, Inc., Pump & Pump Parts T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Rental Bruce Taylor, Project Report Expenses & Employee Mileage Taylor-Dunn, Equipment Parts 39 Stake & Building Supplies, Survey Supplies Triangle Stee~ & Supply Co., Steel J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Hardware The Tustin News, Bid Notice -Truck Bodies U. S. Equipment Co., Inc., Compressor Parts Union Oil Co., Gasoline United ·Auto Parts, Truck Parte United Reprographics, Inc., Printing & Drafting Supplies Utilities Supply Co., Tools Vaniman Camera, Photo Processing John R. Waples R.S., Odor Consultant Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc., Engine Parts & Gaskets West Coast Industries, Building Materials Western Corp., Electric Supplies Western Salt Co., Salt Western Wholesale Co., Equipment Parts Wilson Ford Sales, Truck Parts Russell Wold, Employee Mileage Wood's GMC, Inc., Manual & Truck Repair Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage Xerox Corp., Office Supplies & Reproduction Service Zodiac Paper Coo, Printing Supplies Fred Ae Harper, Various Meeting & COD Expenses AMOUNT 572.82 17. 59 . 170.48 8.80 3~7.67 373.55 1,094.31 72.16 35.70 37.38 32.71 41.48 1:)7.19 28,463.52 1,487.06 3.21 41.16 323.37 123.18 911.70 2,525.14 1,807.05 247.50 106.25 41.00 34.34 286.35 56.26 8.96 810.67 124.98 3 c::A 6".' _.l'-J • Lo,,_ 1,230.76 93.72 69.96 . 218.10 260.38 84.52 309.60 96.20 211.49 13.67 40.14 357.19 31.50 1,215.20 101.71 160.35 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING $ 101,691.51 I-3 WARRANT NO. 22514 22515 22516 22517 22518 22519 22520 22521 22522 22523 22524 22525 22526 22527 22528 22529 22530 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF B & J Construction Co., Contractor PW-032 $ Bassett Office Furniture, Office Equipment James G. Biddle Co., Test Equipment John Carollo Engrs., Engineering -Plant Construction Ducommun Metals & Supply Co., Tools E.T.I. & Kordick, Contractor P2-ll-l & I-8-3 Ficker Architects, Architectural Services J-13 City of Fountain Valley, Plan Check Fee J-13 Grillias, Pirc, Rosier, Alves, Architectural Engr. Pl-16 Hemisphere Constructors, Contractor P2-21 James E. Hoagland Co. & H0agland Engr. Co., Contr. Pl-9-1 Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. & Monteleone & McCrory, J-10 Suit Settlement (I.IO 12-12-73) J. Ray Construction Co., Contractor J-13 Richard Terry & Associates, E.I.R. 73-74 Project Report Twining Laboratories, Testing P2-21, I-8-3 & J-13 United Reprographics, Inc., Plans & Specs Pl-16 F. T. Ziebarth & Ziebarth & Alper, Contractor J-4-1 AMOUNT 3,089.50 328.44 390.11. 55, l~71.~ 159 .b~J 101,968.0C) 2, 929. 50 ~ 385 .OC> • 1,298.75. 54,105.31;, 18,Jl2.62 40' 0()0 . ()() 180,538.13 2,65Q.J.J 121.00 11,323.20 2,555.20 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING $ 475,317.54 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF $ 577,009.05 • I-4 DISTRICT NO. 2 WARRANT NO. ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 22531 22532 22533 22534 2~5 22536 22537 22538 22539 22540 22541 2".-42 22543 ?254L~ John Carollo En~ineers, Los Alisos Feasibility Study $ 1,031.23 18,951.2B 4,387.50 15,838.75 Clean Water Con~ultants, Phase II Anaheim Forebay Kasler Corporation & L.H. Woods & Sons, Contractor 2-14-2 Lowry and Associates, Engineering Service 2-14-3, and Construction Survey 2-14-1 and 2-14-2 Sully Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 2-14-1 Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Inspection 2-14-1 DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF State of California, Annexation Processing Fee 3D & 3E ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 354,693.27 1,118.00 $ 396,020.03 $ 445.00 Boyle Engineering, Engineering Service 3-17 & 3-19, Construction Survey 3-17 & 3-18, Design Survey 3-19 $ Jenkins Construction Company, Contractor 3-12-1 Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Inspection 3-18 21_,055.75 11,256.80 l_,482.00 151,209.90 14.75 A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Saliba Co., Contractor 3-18 Twining Laboratories, Concrete Testing 3-18 DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering Service 3-17 J. F. Shea Co., Inc., Contractor 3-17 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF City of Newport Beach, Connection Fee Collection II $ 185,019.20 $ 185,464.20 $ 11,465.00 119,933.33 $ 131,398.33 304.30 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 225l~6 22547 22548 22549 22550 22551 22552 22553 22554 22555 22556 22557 Boyle Engineering, Engineering Service State of California, Annexation 36 Processing Fee State of California, Annexation 35 Processing Fee FIXED OBLIGATION FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF City of Anaheim, Annual JOS Payment City of Buena Park, Annual JOS Payment City of Fullerton, Annual JOS Payment Garden Grove Sanitary District, Annual JOS Payment City of La Habra, Annual JOS Payment City of Orange, Annual JOS Payment City of Placentia, Annual JOS Payment City of Santa Ana, Annual JOS Payment DISTRICT NO. 11 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Kordick & Son, Inc., Contractor 11-12 III $ AMOUNT 25.50 70.00 70.00 $ 165. "-" 1,561.80 96.70 1,561.80 241.80 386.90 1,474.70 241.80 4,434.50 $ 10,000.00 $ l0,165.50 $ ~ 86,959.35