HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-03-13COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX Bl 27. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 927-08
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
March 7, 19_7 4
TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11
Gentlemen.:
TELEPHONES:
AR EA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directo~s of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange
County, California, wii'l be held:
WEDNESDAY EVENING, MARCH 13, 1974
AT 7!30 P.M.
10844 ELLI~ AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
·~/'"+~~-J!t:L-
s e c .t--e tar y t7
Tentative adjournmentsprior to next regular meeting:
Exec u t iv c Co rmn 1 t t E~ e - 5 : 3 0 p • m • , !\1 arch 1 9 , 19 7 4
'
District No. 2 -(Date in March to be determined by Board)
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS.
REGULAR MEETING
March 1 3 , 1 974 -7:30 p.m.
Post Offic e Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 71 4
540-2910
962-2411
The following is a brief explanation of the more
import ant n on-routine items which app ear on the enclosed agenda
and which are not otherwise self-explanator y . Warrant lists a re
not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediately
preceding the meeting but will app ear in the supplemental agenda
available a t the meeting .
Joint Boards ·
Nos. 10 and 11 -Report and Recommend ations o f the
Execut ive Committe e .
The Committee met on February 26th with Directors Hyde
and Root as g uests. A report of the deliberations and recommenda-
tions was mailed to all active Directors ·on March 4th .
No . l O(a) -Repor t of the ·spec i al Comm i ttee· on Feasibil ity
of Electronic Data Processing System .
Th e special comm itt ee met with the Executive Comm i ttee to
review the final re port o f the consultant, Peat , Marwick , Mi tche ll
·and Company . The summary of the final report wa s included in the
mailing of the Executive Committee report . · Represe.ntatives of the
c oniult ant will make a pr~s~ntation to the Joint Boards o n March
1 3th .
No . 12 -Report ·of the General Counsel on "Conflict of
Int erest" Lesig lation .
Pursuant to the instructions of the Joint Boards , t he
General Counsel met with the Ex e cutive Committee t o discuss pro -
posed guid elines to comp l y with the recently-enacted "c onflict of
interest " legislation . He advised that th6 Attorney 's Comm itt ee
of the California Association of Sanitation ·Agenc i es (CASA) was
meeting on March 8t h to draw uniform gu idelines to comply with
th e l aw . The Committee directed M-r . Ni sson to research the matter
furth er and report to the Joint Boards March 1 3th .
No. 13 -Amendme nts to the Districts' Uniform Guidelines .
Implementin r-; the Ca lifornia. Envirorunental Act of 1970.
The Ge neral Counsel has submitted to the staff, Amendments
to the Districts' Gu idelines to comply with the recently-adopted
changes in the Caiifornia Envitonm~nta~ Act. The a~tion appearing
on the agenda approves the required .changes to the 'Districts' Guide-
lines.
No. 14 -Appearance before Joint Senate and House Committ ee
o~ Science and Astro nautics in Wash ingt on, D~C.
As a result of the highly . successful pilot work being con-
ducted by Cal Tech Jet Propulsion Laboratory personnel at Plant No.
1, officials.of NASA h~ve aske~ that we send a statf member to
appear before the Joint ·Senate ·and Hous~ Committee ,.on science ·and
Astronautics, ·to encourage further financial support for the con-.
tinuation and expansion of the researc h efforts on JPL'~ reactivated
carbon improved wastewater treatment process. .(The JPL project is ·
currently financed by a NASA $60,000 research grant,.
Our staff has been wo~king very closely with the JPL pilot
~ ·· plant technicians and we believe the process results point to a
·possible b r eakt h ro ugh in wastewater treatment. We therefore re-
quest the opportunity to pr.esent our comments to the NASA Coinmittee.
:No. 15 -EPA Interpretation of User Cha~g~s.
The Di s tricts '· Dir ector· of Finance, who is currently .
serving on a special committee of the Association of Metropolitan
Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) on user charge s and industrial cost re-
covery, has advised that EPA staff personnel are ruling out the
use of ad valorem taxes ·a s revenue to comply with the intent of
Federal legis l at i on . The AMS A spe cial comm it tee is .requesting
that the r.J.ajor agencies who do utili ze ad valorem tax as ·a means
· o·f collecting their r evenue adopt ·re so lutio ns requesting EPA to
r~·qonsider their interpretation of . t;he 1972 Federal Water Pol-
lution Control Act A"11en dments to· allow apy revenue pro du cing system
that accomp l ishes a n equi tab l~ distrib ution o f · costs b etwee n in-
dustri al and domestic classes of user s. It is .recommended that
the propos ed re so lut ion be ado~ted.
No . 16 -Draft En.vironmental I mpact Report f or Improved
Trea t ment at Plant iJ o. 2 .
On Ma r ch 4th , a ll a ctive Directors were mailed copies of
the Environr.J.enta l Impact Report for fisca l year 1 9 7 3 -74 and 1 974-7 5
pr ojec ts at Pl ant No . 2 . 'l'he Districts ' cons ul tant , Richar d Te rry
and As s ociates/Environmental Scienc e and Servic es , has completed
his e nvironmental assess~e nt of the p roposed se conda ry trea t r.J.ent
f acili t ies and discuss es .th e envirorunenta l f actors requ ired b y the
State and Federa l r csu l at o ~y acenc ie s · a nd the Ca lifornia Environ -
ment al Qua lity Act of 1970 . If th e D~rectors f i nd that the draft
r eport is in order , the Manage r should be authorized to fi le a
Notic e of Comp l e tion ~it h th0 Secretary o f the Resources Acency or
. a Notic e of Int e nt with the S ta t e Cl e a rihghouse . Afte r the no tic e
-2-
·.-
has been authorized, the District will send copies of the draft
report for review and comment to all public agencies having .juris-
diction over the proposed projects and to all municipalities within
the Districts. The staff will review the report at the Board
meeting prior to consideration of action filing the Notice of Com-
pletion.
No. 17 -Consent Calendar.
The following agenda items fall into this category in
accordance with the definition established by the Boards:
(a) ·and (b) -CloS'eout of Job No. Pl-9-1,' Additional
Secondary Treatment at Plant No. 1.
This project involves the constructio~ of .an additional
secondary treatment trickling filter (5 mgd) and im-
provements to the Plant No. 1 water supply system. The
original construction contract' was $786,300. To date,
the Board has authorized two Change Orders for additional
work not provided for in the plans and specifications
totaling $28,943.j9, A ~ubstantial amount of the con-
tract involved revamping existing facilities and required
plan modifications in the field to accomplish the work.·
The Change Orders o n this job are less than 5% of the
contract price. R~solution No. 74-4 0 accepts the job
as complete and authorizes r~cordation of a Notice of
Completion of Work.
(c) Change Order No. ·2 to ·Job ·No·.· J-4-1 tinc·r ·e·a:s·ed
·Water Reuse Facilitie·s· ·at Plant· ·No.· 2).
During the course of cohstruction, it has become .
necessary to direct the contractor to perform addi~
tional work which was qot cont~mplated in the plans
and specifications. The Change Order appearing in
the agenda authorizes an additional ~3 ,l 94 and 159
days time to accomplish the work. We hope to fina l ize
this project in time for the April Board meeting.
(d) Assig nm ent of Funds on Power Reliability Projec t
at Plant No. 2 , J o b No . P2 -20 .
The Contractor, Mel Gorham Electric , has experienced
some financial difficulty in completing this project
and it h a s become h e c es sary for his bonding company
to assure that the Districts ' work will be completed
as contracted; th e refore , the aµthorization to assign
the funds due Mel Gorham Electric to the bonding
company i s in order.
-3-
District No. 7
No. 36 Authorizing the Staff to Prepare Plans and
Specifications for Repair of the Gisl·er· Trunk.
Following the diversion of substantial flows from the
Gisler Trunk to the newly-constructed Sunflower Interceptor
system, our crews have discovered heavy infiltration of ground-
water flows into the Gisler Trunk at one location. The staff
recommends that plans and specifications for the repair work be
prepared by District personnel for bidding purposes. The engineer's
estimated ·project cost is $30 1 000.
No. 37 -Annexation No . 35 -Fowler Annexation.
The District's propo~ed annexation of 15 acres in the
vicinity of Santiago Boulevard, Ryals Lane, and Avenida Palamar
in the City of Orange has cleared the Local Agency Formation Com-
mission. The standard Resolution appearing in the agenda orders
the annexation in accordance with t he terms the District Board .
established .. when the proceedings were initiated. The proponents
have paid annexation fees totaling $6 ,4 94 . The property will be
developed in accordance with the ~ensities propos~d in the Dis-
trict's Master Plan. rt is recommended that standard Resolution
No. 74-41~7 be approved.
Di strict No . 11
\
No. 41 -Annexation No~ 17 -Bolsa Chica State Beach.
Pursuant to the Board's direction, the staff has re-
viewed the proposed annexation of 3 .. 55 acres of Bolsa Chica State
Beach to the District .. It is our rec ommendation that the Board
autnorize initiation of proceedings for· annexation.
District No . 2
No. 46 Cont·ract· No. 2-14-1, Change Order No. 12 to
Santa Ana: Rive·r · Tn't'erc·e p tor .. '.
During the course of construction of the Santa Ana ~iver
Interceptor, we received .notification from the Flood Control
District that the rip-rap protection of the Orange Subtrunk has
been washed a wa y fr om t h e crossing of the Santa An a River .. The
District's cont ractor wa s directed to replace the rip-rap in
order to protect the sewer from a wash-out because of winter rains.
The amount of the Change Order is $7 ,995 .06.
No. 47 -Claim Against the Dtstridt re: Contract No.
2-14-1.
The District has receiv ed a property damage claim in the
amount of $50 0 ,000 relative to the construction of Contract No.
2 -14~1. It i s the Ge n e r a l Counsel 's rec o mmendation that the
cla i m be d en i e d a nd r efe rred t o the Di s trict 's contractor .
-4-
No. 49 -Annexation No. 9.
The District's staff has reviewed a request on behalf
of Grove rark Co n struction, Inc., to annex 7. 251 acres .(proposed
Tra~t No. 83 9 9) to the District in the vicinity of Collins Avenue
and Prospect in the City of Orange. The proponents expect to
construct a 72-unit townhouse complex and a City of Orange sewer
is accessible to the development. The proposed density is con-
sistent with the surrounding properties and is compatible with
the District's Master Plan in this particular case. It is there-
fore recommended that the Boards authorize initiating proceedings
for the annexation. ·
No. 53 -Adjourned Meeting.
Chairman Ne vil has sugge_sted that the Board meet some-·
time during the month of March to consider the Project Report
and Environmental Impact Statement prepared for Reach 3 of the
Santa Ana River Interceptor. The date and time of the adjourned.
meeting wil~ be determined at the Joint Board meeting.
· District No. 3
No. 54 -Ap p roving Alignment of the Knott Interceptor.
We h a v e r e c e i ved communi ca ~i ons fr om the Cities o f
We s tmin s ter a nd Bu e n a Park, a d v i s i ng tha t t h e i r Ci t y Counc ils
have c onc urred wrt h the. proposed a lig nm e nt o f the Knott Inter-
ceptor c on struct io n throug h their cities. The action appearing
on the a genda i s t o re c e ive a nd fi~e t h ese l e tters o f c onc urrence.
Nos. 55 a n d 56 -Com p letion o f Co nstruct ion of Contract
No. 3-17 (K not t Intercept o r Se wer ).
This $5.8 millio n pro ject i s n o w c ompl e t e . The p r o j e ct,
which b e g a n in J u n e , 1 9 7 2 at the i n t e r section o f Broo khur st a nd
Ellis i n Fo unta in Val l ey , invo lved the ins tallat io n o f a 9 6-inc h ·
ins ide di ame t e r concre t e pipe ·5 mil es to Ne wla nd a nd Bol s a in
the ~est m i nster a r ea . C h~n ~e Order No . 3 , tot a l i n g $38 ,627 .3 3,
re p res e nt s s everal it ems of wo rk whi c h a r e princ i pally r e l a t e d
to a dditi on a l b edding r ock ma t e ria l, st r ee t wor k required in·
lie u o f r i ghts of way a c qu i sition a nd c h anged co n d i t i o n s . Th e
Change Orders fo r add it i o na l roc k a nd work require d t o tal
$56 ,573 wh i ch is less than 1 % o f the ~r i g in a l co ntra ct pr i c e .
Change Order No. 4 a d justs t h e eng i nee r's q u an tit ies
t o the ac t ual amounts of material s installed in acco r dan ce wi th
the p lans and spec i fications , and ·c h ange Or d er No . 5 g rant s a
time e xt ens i on of 1 04 days to t h e contractor·. Reso lut i on No .
74-44 -3 accepts the contract as comp l ete and aut h o r izes the
ex ec u t i o n of a Closeout Agreement a nd r e corda tio n o f a Notice
of Comp l et i on of Work . ·
-5-
No. 57 -Cl a im for Dama ges r e : Contract No . 3-18 .
The Districts have received a damage claim totaling
$100,000 re: Construction of Contract No. 3-18.' It is the
General Counsel's recommendation that the claim be denied and
referred to the contractor.
No. 58 -Draft Environmental Impact Report on Contract
No. 3-19.
The motion appearing on the agenda ratifies the action
of the staff in filing a Notice of Completion on the draft
Environmental Impact Report for Contract eo. 3-19. It was
necessary t6 file the Notice of Complet~on of the report to meet
the time constraints relative to the filing of comments by the
public agencies involved. Cont~act No. 3-19 will provide a
21-inch interceptor sewer in Imperial Highway beginning at Beach
Boulevard in La Habra extending easterly 2 3/4 miles through the
Cities of La Habra and Fullerton to 1300 feet east of Palm Street-
in the City of Brea. .Total estimated project cost is $589 ,000 .
We hope to award a construction contract · in June and complete
construction by January, 1975. ·
FAH:j
-6-
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
Joint Chairman
March 13, 19 74
Call on Director Don Smith, to introdu ce the new
Directors from the City of Orange .
...
Adopt a Resolution of Appre ciation for the s e r vic es
of retiring Director Edward Just and Director Don Smith.
Announce that the Water Pricing Committee meeting
originally scheduled for 5:00 p.m., March 20th, has been cancelled .
Call meeting o f the Executive Committee for 5:30 p .m.
K~
Wednesday, Ma rch 20th. Invite Directors ~L~in (Br ea ), Temple
rO range ) and Winn (Villa Park).
March 13, 1974
TO: Joint Chairman Finnell
RE: Agenda Item No. 4 -Seating new members of the Boards
We have received excerpts from the following agencies regarding
elections of mayors and appointments of alternates:
AGENCY
Brea
DIST.
2
3
MAYOR
*Leonard MacKain
Leonard MacKain
* Serving as Active Director
ALTERNATE
Donald Fox
*Donald Fox
•I -'
BOA kt DS OF D mECTO ;?S
Coun t y 'Sanita tion D ist ri cts Post Office Box 8 1 27
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Ca lif., 92708
Telephones:
II
(1)
(2)
( 3)
F LE ··-··············
LmrR ...... _ .... ( 4)
A/C .-Tl<\.~ ~·
(5)
lETT£R --~-
:~T~~
~
ILF •... (~
l ER ·-~
A/C _ .• TKlR •.•
--------
-"'-····--·--,
JOINT BOARDS
MEETING DATE
MARCH 13) 1974 7:30 P.M .
Pled ge of Allegi ance and Invocation
Ro ll Call
Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AG ENDA
~DJDURflMllHS PflSTE D.V
l.iOMP & "IL ,GE .... ~ .. .
FILlS ~:T UP .. .v,'.'. ........... ;
iE' • ".1:> vEl<flFIED.v
,_ffi[l\,} l/i{ TT ~ ..... ~•
MINUTE~ ' T .!It V.: .. ~
MINUl E~ " LED .V:. ... -
Co ns ideration of motion t o receive and file minute
excerpts from the various ~ities regarding ~lections
of mayors and appointments of alternates , and
seating new members of the Boar ds ~, <\..-r . 'Q..
(~) ~"'-.+"!)
EA Cti DISTRJ:C'l:
Consideration of motion approving minut e s of the
·followi ng meetings, as mailed:
M{/ Dist r ict 1 February 1 3 , 1 974 regular.
(V1(5 District 2 February 1 3 ,.1974 regular
f'Vl /5 District 3 February 13, 197~ r eguiar
f'llf~ District 5 February 13, 19"( 4 re g ular
Mls District 6 February 13, 197 l! r egular
Febru ary 1 3, 197~ r egul ar , and
F'ebru ary 26 , 1 974 adj o ur·n ed Ml~ District 7
M\? District 11 February 13, 19'( 4 regul ar
ALL DIS TRICTS
Report of t he Joint
ALL DISTR I CTS
Re port of the Gen e ral Mana g e r
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of tfi'e Gen e ral Coun se l
(9)
~\'?
(10)
FILE ---
LETTER -·--·-
A/C _.TKLR ••••
---....
LETTER~
A/C • .:.. TKl.R r ) ~-k· \ 11
f\\~
•I-~
lETTER ···-:-0
A/C ,_TKLR --
~~
---(13)
F!!!..-·········· -
lmER ·:·-········ \\(\ l ~
A/C _TKLR ·-·I I \ l
ALL DISTRIC TS
Report of the Ex ecu tive Comm i ttee and consideration of
motion t o r·eceive and file Comm i ttee 's wr itt en report
AL L DI STRICTS
Consid e r ation of action on items re commended by th e
Executive Committee:
(a) Report of Special Committee o n Feas~bility of
Electronic Data Processing System
~ Report of Committee
~ Report of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.,
Consultant
(3)
(4)
Cons idera tion of motion to r ece ive and file
Report to th e Co u nty Sanitation Districts
of Or ange Co unt y on a Data Pr ocess ing
Feasibil i ty St udy and I mp lementation Plan,
dated Feb ruary , 1974, submitted by
Peat, Marwick , Mi tc he ll ~ Co~
Consid e ration of motion approving rec omm endations
of Peat, Marwick , Mitch~ll & Co. and the Special·
Committ ee on Feasibility of Electronic Da ta
Pr ocessing System, and .authorizing impl em e n tation
of said recommendations, as c oncurr ed in by the
Executive Committee ..
AL L DISTRICTS
Cons i deration of motion authorizing the s ~aff to r equest
proposal(s) for c onsult i ng services in connection with
imp l ementation of Data Pr ocess ing Plan
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of Ge n eral Cou)lQ._el re "Conf;l.ict of Interest "
legislation ~c..ra.U ~ ~-1 if-. 6.J. C\~1 ~.11)
~ ~-7£j _ 5 ~ ( '5,c.,<-7)
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion approvin g amendmentg to the Districts '
Uniform Gu idelines Implementing the California Environme nt a l
.Quality Act of 1970 , as amended , to conform with recent
cha n ges · in State regulations , as r e commended by the Gene r a l
\~r-/~L-_sel (ffi~ DISTRICTS
lmER ---l'
A/C -TKLR ··-N\ )
(15)
Consideration of motion authorizing t he General Ma nage r to
desi gnate one staff member to appear before the Joint Senate
and House Committee on Science and Astronautics in \vash ington ,
D. C . , on or abo1.l.t March 21 , 197 4, to pre se nt the local. sewering
agencies ' viewpoints on rea ct ivated carbon improved wastewater
treatment process , as requested by Dr . Fletcher of NASA ; and
authorizing reimbursement of trave l, meals , lodging and
in c i dental expenses incurred
ALL DISTRICTS
Con s id eration o f Res olution No. 74-39 , requesting interpretation
of the F e d e ral Water Pollution Contro l Act Amendments of 1 972 ,
a n d th e rul es and r eg ul atio ns :Lmplem enting said act , to allow
any reve nue producing system (includin g a d valorem taxes) that
accomp li s h es an equit a ble di s tribution of co s ts am ong ~sers to
meet t h e r eq uiremen t s of the act , and a llow indus t r ial co s t
r e cove ry from a ll industries wi th in th e applicant 's jur i sd ic tion ;
a nd direc t in g co p ies of s ai d r esolution be forwarded to Orange
Count y 's con gress i b n a l delegat i o n , members of the House a nd
Senat e Public Work s Committees , a nd the Environme n ta l Pro tection
. Age ncy . See page 11 A"
-2 -
( 16) ·ALL DISTRICTS
Environmental Impact Report for Improved Treatment at
Fll.E ............ ,..... Plant No .. 2 ~ ...... Zr;:~
>Jc _TKLR _ ,. ( ~J. Staff review of draft Environmental Impact Report
~~PJ 'f (b) Consideratiori of motion to receive and file draft
Environmental Impact Report for Improved Treatment
Fll.E ----------·----·
lmER --··· .. a.o
A/C -1111 ....
JtM v--
(c)
at Plant No. 2, dated March, 1974, prepared by
Richard Terry & Associates/En~ironmental Science &
Services, with the assistance of the Districts' staff;
directing the Jiling of Notice of Completion and
Notice of Intent in accordance with the Local Guidelines
Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act
of 1970, as amended; and establishing April 25, 1974,
as the date for which all comments must be received
on said Environmental Impact Report
Consideration of motion fixing April 3, 1974, as the
date for an infor~al public hearing on the draft
Environmental Impact Report for Improved Treatment
at Plant No. 2, and authorizing the staff to conduct
said hearing at the Districts' administrative offices
(17) ALL DISTRICTS
fiU: ................. .
I.ETTER ............. .
A/C -.TKLR ... .
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered
as not requiring discussion or further explanation and
unless any particular item is requested to ·be removed from
the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member
of the public in attendance, there will be no separate
discussion of these items. All items on the consent
calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions,
and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on
the consent c&lendar. All items removed from the consent
·calendar shall be considered separately in the regular order
of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the
consent calendar sha~l, upon rec0gnition by the chair, state
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar~
* * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from
the consent calendar.
Consideration of riction to approve all agenda items
appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed
from same.
(a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3,
to the plans and specifications for Additional Secondary
Treatment at Reclamation Plant 1No. 1, Job No. Pl-9--1,
authorizing an addition of $10,542.62 and granting an
extension of time of 137 calendar days to the contract
with James E. Hoagland & Hoagland Engineering, a Joint
Venture. See page "B"
(b) tandard Resolution No. 74-40, accepting
Additional Secondary · ent at Reclamation Plant
No. 1, Job No. Pl-9-1, as comp~ nd authorizing
execution of a Notice of_ Completion
(CONSENT CALENDAR continuetl on page 4)
-3-
(17) (CON SEN T CALENDAR continued· from page 3)
(c)
fll! -·-··-···-·-·-·
Con sid e ration of motion appro ving Ch a n g e Order No . 2,
to the plans 2nd spccificat!ona f0r Increased ~dter
Reuse Fa ciJitie s at Plant No. 2, Job No . J-4 -1 1 authorizing an addition of $3 ,194 .00 and gran ting
$'JER ---··-
A/C _TKLR ... -----an extension of time of 15 9 calendar days to .the
contract with F . T . Ziebarth and Ziebart & Al per , a
Joint Venture . See page "C"
(d)
FILE .......... '·"· ··-
~--_'.'.:~~
Consid eration of motion to receive, file and approve
Assignme nt, dated ~;,;;..\ 'l1i./ , f r om Me l Gorham Electric
Compan y , Contractor for P~wer Reliability Project at
Plant No . 2 , Job ~o . P2 -20, to Indust~ia l Indemnity
Company, bonding company fo~ ~aid project , of remaining
funds due contractor on said job
A/C _TKlll. -
(18) ALL DIS TR ICTS
FILE ··--··-··-··
(19)
M~~
(20)
Considerat ion of items deleted from consent calendar :
Consideration of Resolut i on No .. 74 -40 , accepting
Additional Secondary Tr.eatment a t Recl2.mation Plant
No. 1, Job No. Pl-9 -1, as complete; authorizing
execution of a Notice of comp l etion; and approving
Final Closeout Agreement . See page ' "IV"
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to convene in executive session r e·
·personnel matters ~-. !$5
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to r econvene in regular session 9:0 7
(21) ALL DISTRICTS
(22 )
(2 3 )
Consideration of action on it ems cons i dered in e xec utive
session ~ ~ .. Cit... 1'1 -.5 '-f t~N
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress
rep ort on Treatment Plant Construction Projects . See ·
page "D"
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideratio n of motion to r eceive and file certification
of the Gen eral Mana g er that he has checke d al l bills
appearing on the agenda , found the m to be in order, and
·that he recommends authorization-for payment
(24 ) ALL DISTRICTS
(24) Consideration of r o ll cal l vote motion a pproving
RDU cAU vore__.....,. Joint Oper a ting and Capital Outla y Revo l ving· Fund
warrant books for si g n a ture of the Chairman of
r;A )> District No . 1, and authcri z j _ng p a ym en t of cliam s
I"\ lis t ed on pa.g e 11 I "
--< if any
and c_o~cations or supplement a l ag enda
(26) DISTRIC TS 1 l 7
Cons iJe.!. atio11 of mot iort t:tpproving· :3U:3pe n :3e fu nd warrants>
If any . See .:oupplementa l a g enda e.tte:ehment
\2?) DISTRICT 1
(28 )
( 29).
Con:3iderat ion of mot i on approvi nz; i,mrrant o , if any . 8ee
supplcmentel a g enda attachmen t
ISTR I C'l' 1
ther bu si~ss a nd ~uni cat i ons
i ms , if a n '\ ·. "'---. ,.
o r supplemental agenda
DISTRIC'11 1 () .. l 0 Con sid e r atio n o f motio n to ad journ 7
_}J_
( 30) DI STRICT 5·
~~ (3 0) Consideration of mot i o n approv ing wa rrants .
See page "II "
(.31 ~
~' _.ite s, if
~ic at i ons -~ s.upplemental agenda
(32) DI STR I CT 5
~\~ Considerati on of motion to adj ourn ~·.1 °
( 33) DISTRT GT 6
(34)
Co118idera:tion of motion a p proving uarrants 3 if any. £8~
supple fficntal agenda attaehffient
busi ness a~~mmu nic ~r supp lemental a g enda
items, if any
(35) 'DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn °I : \D
.fl l.E -·-······Y.3 6 ) -=~~~:~·o.-. Ml?
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion authorizing and directing the staff
to pre pare plans and specifications f or Repairs to Gis l er
Trunk (Infiltration Redu·ction)_, Contract No . 7-1-R
,_ _:. ..... (37)
FILE \ C.......· A4-~\ol.
TKL R: -
I .
DISTR IC T 7
Co nsideration o~ Standard Resolution No . 74 -41-7, o rdering
annexa tio n of approximate l y 15 ac res to the District in -the
vi~inity of Santiago Boulevard , Ryals La ne and Aven i da
Palama r i n the City of Or a nge (Proposed Annexati o n No. 35 -
Tract No . 8 235 to County Sani tat i on Distiict No . 7 )
.,( · .. ( 38) DI STRICT 7
(38) Consideration of motion approving warrants .
See page "III "
. ( 39) DISTRICT 7
(40)
(41)
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
it ems , -if any ~ y 1 Lf "~ (~) .
DI STR I CT 7
Conside ration of mot;_oq. to adjourn q._ \'V' ...
DI STRICT 11 .
Conside r a tion of St a ndard Res o lution No . 74 -4 2 -11 aut h orizing
i nitia t ion of pro c ee ain gs to a nnex a p pr o xima tely 3 .55 acres
of territ o r y t o the Di str ict in t he v i cini ty of War n e r Av e nue
and P a cific Coast Hi ghway Al terna te (Pr op osed Ann e x at ion
No . 17 -Bals a Chic a S t a te Beach Annex a tion to Co unty
Sanitation District No. 11)
(4 2 ) DISTRIC TS 3 & 11
(Vl.\7 (42) Consider atio n of mo ti on appro vin g suspense fund
\'\'\\) wa rrants . See page "II "
(4 3 ) DIST EI CT 11
{\I\';; ( 4 3) Cons i der~tion of mot i on approving warrants .
See page "III "
(44) D STR IC T 11~ · ..
O er bu s in e s~ c ommun~s or sup p l e me n tal age n da .
it e , if any
-5-
...
(46)
1;.... -··-····· :r _____ .. __
(47)
-
(4 8)
. Fllf ·--·-··-
LETTER ---
. A/_C -~LR .iJI\ I l ~.DLi' < • l I I ~
~}~
(49)
f'. -.·-l Ve...
A/C ~~Kl;-M \5
( 50·)
r.E ·······-
lETTER ...... ,wM-/\n \ s
.A/C _.TKlR -f H ~
DISTRICT 11 Consid ~I'at .ion of mot i on to adjo~rn q~ fJ
DISTRICT 2
Consid e rati o n of motion approving Change Order No . 12,
t o the plans and s pecifications for Santa Ana River ·
Int erc e ptor f r om Re c l am ati o n Plant No . 1 to Katella
Avenue, Contract No . 2-1 4-1 , author izing an addition of
$7,9 95.06 to the cont ract with Sully -Mill er Contracting
Company . See page "E"
DISTRICT 2
Consideration o f motion to receive and file Cla i m for
Pers onal Injuries submitted by Henry Stone and Jerry But ler
i n the amount of $500,000 in connection with construction
of the Santa Ana River Interceptoi from Recla~ation P l ant
No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-1 4-1, and rejecting
said claim on the basis that it is an i mproperly prepared
claim and is defective as· to form in that ther e is no
entity entitled "Sanitation District of Orange County",
as recommended by the General Counsel ·
DISTRI CT 2
Consi deration of Standard Reso lu tion No. 74 -43 -2, a~thorizing
accept ance of Grant of-Easement from Orange County Water
District fo r a permanent easement i n connection wi th construction
of the Santa Ana Rive r Int erceptor from Katella Avenue to
La Palma Avenue, Contrac t ~o. 2 -14-2~ at no cost to th e
Di strict ·
DI STRICT 2 ~~
Consideration of Standard Resolution No . 74 -~2, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to anne x approximately 7 .251 acres
o f territory to the District in the vicinity of Prospect Av enue
and Coilins Avenue in th e Ci ty of Orange (Proposed Annexation
·No . ·9 -Tract No. 8399 to C~unty Sanitation Dis trict No. 2)
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to r eceive and file staff pr ogres s
r eport o n constructi6n of the · Santa Ana Riv~r Interceptor
f~om Reclamation Plant No . 1 to Katella Av~nue , Contract
No. 2-1 4-1 , and the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Katella
Avenue to La Palma Avenue , Contract No . 2-14 -2. See
page "F"
(51) DISTRICT 2
(51 ) Conside r ation of mot i on approv i rig warrants .
See page "II"
~--..J--·D~STRICT 2
IJ..A\ c:;v-:. Other bu s ines s and communications o r supplem ental agenda
~ items , if any r 1\1.\~ 0..1·''· '"'L... _,, -r-~·
(53)
r.tE ·········
tfTT~ .. ( 5 4)
A/C _ntlR
DI STRICT 2
Consideration of mo tion to adjo.urn tc:i J4a-rctr ~ 3
(Date to be det e rmined by Board) q ~11
DI STRICT 3
Con s i de r a tio n of m o t ~on to receive and fil e minute ex cer p t
from t he Cit y of Bu e n a Park, da t e d Fe br uary 19, 1974, a n d
letter from the Ci t y of We stminster , d a t e d Feb ru a ry 2 7 , 1974,
approving ali g nment of the Knott Interceptor , Reaches 5 , 6 ,
7 and 8, Contra ct No. 3-2 (
-6-
File ---
UYrf'tl -------
A/C _JKLR -··-
(57)
---(58)
-·----
ETIER
_____ { 59)
A/C __ .TKLR -l ' .----M 7 ·--
DI S'l'H I CT .3
(a) Con s id e ratio n of motion ap provi ng Ch a n g e Order No. 3,
(b)
(c)
-to the pla~s a~j ~~ccifi cat i on s for the Knott
Int erceptor , a Portion of Hea ch 1 and Reaches 2 & 3,
Contra ct No. 3-17, authorizing an addition of $38,627.33
to the contract with . J. F . Shea Company. See
page "G"
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4~
to the plans and specifications for the Knott
Interc eptor, a Portion of Reach J. and Reaches 2 & 3,
Contract No. 3-17, authorizing an adjustment of
engineer's quantities to the cont~act with J. F. Shea ·
Company. See page "H" ·
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5,
to the plans and specifications for the Knott
Iriterceptor, a Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 & 3,
Contract No . 3 -17, grariting an extension of time of
104 calendar days to the contract with J. F. Shea
Company. See pa.ge "I 11
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of Resolution No . 74-44-3, accepting the
Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 & 3,
Contract No. 3 -1 7, as complete; authorizing execution of a
.Notice of Co.i:np ..Le . .t.i.OJ:l upon _rec_eipt of letters of compliance
from agencies issuing permit.$ in · connection-wi.th -said contract ;
and approving ~inal Closeout Agreement . See page 11 J"
DISTRICT 3
Considera tion of motion to receive, file and deny claim of
Kenneth C. Young, dated February 25, 197 4 , ~n the amount of
$100,000 in connection with construction of the · Knott
I.ntercept or , Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18, as recommended by
the General Counsel
DISTRICT 3
-Consid eration of motion to receiv:e and file draft Environmental ·
I mpac t Report for Imp erial Relief Interceptor Sewer, Reaches 22
and 23 (mailed to Chairman and Directors of affected cities
with February agenda ma terial); and ratifying action of staff
in fili ng of Notice of Completion in accordance with the Local
Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality
Act of 1970 , as amended; and e~tablishing March 20 , 1974~ as
the date for which all comments must be rec eived on said
Enviro lli~ental Impact Report
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to receive and file staff p ro gress
report on c o nstruction o f the Knott Interceptor , Reach 4,
Con.tract No . 3-18. See page 11 K"
( 60) DISTRIC'l1 3
(60) Conside r at ion of motion approving warrants.
See page "IIn
(( 61)\ DISTRICT 3 ~ Other business and communicatio'ns or supp lementa l agenda
it ems , if any f~ ,....,_ ~ _,;
(62) DISTRIC T 3
Considera tion of motion to adjourn 9 :.;i l
~-
-7-·
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
March 13, 1974 -7:30 P.M.
-~
RESOLUTION NO. 74-39
REQUESTING INTERPRETATION OF FEDERAL WATER
POLLUTION CON'l'ROL AC'r AMENDMENTS OF 19 7 2
TO ALLOH AD VALOHEM '"l1AXES IN REVENUE SYSTEMS
AND INDUS 1rRIAL COS'"l1 RECOVERY FROM ALL
INDUS':rRIES WITHIN AN AGENCY'S JURISDICTION
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2, 3,
5, 6, 1, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
REQUESTING INTERPRETATION OF THE FEDERAL WATER
POLLUTION CONTROL ACT AMENDMENTS OF 1972, AND
THE RULES AND REGULATIONS IMPLEMENTING SAID
ACT, TO ALLOW ANY REVENUE PRODUCING SYSTEM
(INCLUDING AD VALOREM TAXES) THAT ACCOMPLISHES
AN EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION OF COSTS AMONG USERS
TO ~IBET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACT, AND
INDUSTRIAL COST RECOVERY FROM :ALL INDUSTRIES
WITHIN THE APPLICANT'S JURISDICTION
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, Section 204 of the Federal Water Pol!ution Control
Act Amendments of 1972 provides, in part, as follows:
and,
" ... (b)(1) Notwithsta~ding any other provision
of this title, the Administrator shall not approve
any grant for any treatment works under section
201(g)(l) after March 1, 19?3, unless he shall
first have dete·rmined that the applicant (A) has
adopted or wiZl adopt' a system of charges to
assure that ~ach recipient of waste treatment
services within the applicant's jurisdiction,
as determined by the Administrator,·will pay its
proportionate share of the costs of operation
and maintenance (including replacement) of any
waste treatment services provided by the appl~cant:
(B) has made provisio~ for the payment to such
applicant by the industrial users of the treatment
works, of that portion of the_ cost of construction
of such treatment works (as determined by the
Administrator) which is allocable to the treatment
of such industrial wastes to the extent attributable
to the Federal share of the cost of construction ... "
WHEREAS, the rul~s and regulations of the Environmental Protection
Agency implementing the Act provide that ad valorem taxes may not
be used as a source of revenue to meet said user charge provision of
the Act; and,
WHEREAS, it has been further interpreted that the industrial
cost recovery provision of the Act requires that the portion of the
cost of construction of treatment works allocable to industrial wa0tes
AGENDA ITEM #15 A-1 ALL DISTRICTS
be recovered only from those industries served by the individual
project rather than from all industries within the applicant's
jurisdiction; and,
WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
California, presently serving a population of 1,500,000 in more than
twenty-four communities, have·heretofore demonstrated their ability to
finance their activities and distribute costs of said activities
equitably among their users, resulting in an efficient and cost-effective
program of wastewater quality control in Orange County; and·,
WHEREAS, said pr1ogram of wastewater q.uali ty control has heretofore
been, for the most part, supported for capital improvements and
expansion and operation and maintenance. of sewerage facilities by ad
valorem taxes; and,
WHEREAS, implementation of a direct user charge by th_e County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County would involve a system of
charges for over 400,000 ~onnections, would not be cost effective,
and would significantly add to the Districts' operating costs by· as
much as 25%, thus placing an additional burden on all users; and,
WHEREAS, recovery of costs from industry. attributable to the
portion of the construction of treatment works allocable to industrial
wastes from those individual industries. tributary to a specifically ·
t~nded project, would result in ari inequitable distribution of said
costs among users and, further," result in an unfair economic advantage
or disadvantage among certain industrial dischargers; and,
WHEREAS, these Joint. Boards of Directors have heretofore declare.d
their intent to adopt a revenue probram for :t:inancing of
Districts' activities which envisions use of ad valorem tax as a
component of said revenue program and which said revenue program will
demonstrate the Districts' ability to f~nd operation and maintenance
of facilities; demonstrate the Districts' ability to finance the ~
replacement and expansicn of facilities as needed; demonstrate that
the industrial community will pay its proportionate share of Districts'
AGENDA ITEM #15 A-2 ALL DISTRICTS
costs and will adopt ;nctustrial waste discharge rules and regulat~ons
which co~ply with applicable state and federal regulations; and demon-
strate that Districts' costs are equitably distributed among users; and~
WHEREAS, the Districts propose to accomplish the above in
accordance with the Water Pollution Control Act's stated objective
of minimizing procedures and paperwork and interagency decisions and
procedures and the best· utilization of available manpower and funds.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE:
That the Joint County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
hereby request that interpretation of the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act amendments of 1972, and the rules and regulations
implementing said Act, allow any revenue-producing system (including
. .
ad valorem taxes) that accomplishes an equitable distribution of costs
to the users of an applicant's system; and,
Allow allocation of industrial cost recovery for industry's
proportionate share of the cost· of construction of treatment works
among all industries within an applicant's Jurisdiction; and, ·
That the above be deemed as meeting the require-·
rnents of said Act for eligibility for federal construction grant
f\l.nding of applicant's project. ·
AGENDA ITEM #15 A-3 ALL DISTRICTS
cou;ny SA:nT,\THr~ DISTI~IC.TS or: 0!'..;\~:r.r: cou::tY
P • 0 • Box 3 1 2 7 - 1 0 d · l · l E 11 i s , \ v (•nu c
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CIIA:~GE 01U>~R
c. 0. :\0. 3 . James E. Hoagland Co. and Hoagland
~~~~~~~~~~-co:rrr"ACTOR: EnQ ine er ing Co. , A .Joint Ven tu re DATE ~!arch 13, 197 ~
JOB: Additional Secondary Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-9-1
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (Ill!!ICil\'X) $ __ 1 o__,, __ s_4_2 _. 6_2_
•· In accordance with contract provisions, the followin~ changes in the---
contract and/or contract work arc hereby authorized and as cor.lpensation
therefor, the following additions· to or
1
tlc<luctions from the contract price are
hereby approvcJ.. • ..
Reference: Contractor's Correspondence Dated June 1, 1973
(May 30, 1973 & April 4, 1973"), August 9, 1973 &
February 28, 1974.
·"RECAP" of February 28, 1974,
Change items 3A through 3Y inclusive .
. , .
Districts Correspondence July 17~ 1973, July 24, 1973,
August 15, 1973, September 7, 1973 and December 17, 1973 , .
Drawings A-7 <Rev. 2), A-14, A-12, A-1, A-10
Add:
In$tall n~w flexible screenings conveyor rollers
•
Install additional plant water system connection
and revise pipi~g
Repla~e lever op~raied valve with gear operated
unit
Modify existing plant water pump to allow
installation in new pump .station
Provide additional paving and con-:.rete ·slabs
at incinerators, chlorinators, trtckling filters,
and hydraulic gate operation p~mps
Rework incinerator cpntrols
Remove unsuitable foundation material under
the provision of Proposal Item A as directed
by the engineer
. .
Provide and install steel pipe adaption.at
distribution.structure
Install new Type 316 stainless steel bolts in
disc water screen
Relocate sluice gate at plant.water pump station
Furnish and install·health department approved
air gap at the Fountain Valley City Water service
Install baffle in screenings hopper
••
ADD
ADD
·ADD
ADD
ADD
ADD
ADD
ADD
ADD
ADD
ADD
ADD
2,288.00
484.~
.312 .. 74
879.59.
1,317.33
9&.70
127.50
l,°IS4.95
276.00
1,086.:'
~
1,161.86
139.84
AGENDA ITEM #17(a) B-1 ALL DISTRICTS
COUNTY SA:HTATIO!~ DISTRICTS .Of ORAt~GE comn.Y
P. O. Box 31Z7 -108~4-Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CllANGE OIU>ER
James E. Hoagland Co. nnd Hn~~land ·
CO~T~CTOI~=~E~n~z~~n~e_e_r_i~n~~~c~o~,~1~I~o~i-n~t~'~·c~n~t~;~1r~o~~~
C. 0. NO. 3 DATE --~-ta_r_c_h--1-3-, -l -l l-~-.+--
JOB: Additional Secondary Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-9-1
A-.. ,: • (Continued)
Modify trickling filter backwash slide gate to
conform to existing conditio~
Modify hydraulic system at incinerator.rams
Modify existing conveyor system to accept new
ram tables
ADD
ADD
ADD.
163.59
SSS.OD
497.06
TOTAL ADD $ 1 0 ,.s 4 2 ·• 6 2 .
Extension of Contract Time
As a reiult of the above additional work and
due to operational requirements, the Contractor
is hereby granted an extension of contract
time of 137 calendar davs
• TOTAL EXTENSIO.N OF CONTRACT TIME 137 calendar davs
. "-"'
Summary of Contract Time
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Completion Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension this Change Order
Total Extension of Contract Time
Revised Contract Completion Time
Revised.Contract Completion Date
l>o--~d authorization date:
., March 13, 1974
By
------~~------c~o-n_s_u_l~t~i-1-1g--.E-·n_g_i_1-~e~e-r
By
--------------~-----------------~-Contractor
AGENDA ITEM #17(a)
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
October 26, 1972
300 calendar days
August 22, 1973
137 calendar days
197 ~alendar days
497 calendar days
March 7, 1974
$ 28,943.39
This Change (ADD) (D~"'"Of) $ 10, 542. 62
Amended Contract Price s 825,786.01
B-2
Approved:
·COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By ______ ~-------~--~~--~-:----~-Clu et Lnr,1nc:.:.! ...
ALL DISTRIC1 1S
l.UU&\l l ~,\:H !'Ar IO>~ lJISTl~lCTS OF O!'"\::GE cou:ffY
P. o. Box 8127 -10'1-l·l Ellis. ,\v~nue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE OIU>ER
F. T. Ziebarth and Ziebarth & Alper
;\ .Tni.nt Vent11re
C. 0. i\O. 2
:o:rrrJ\CTOR: DATE --~--.f-a_r_c_h __ l~~~-J-9_7_4----~
IOB: Increased Water Reuse Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No .. I-4-1
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (~1}ml~i) $ -------3,194.00
• In accordance with contract provisions, ·the following changes in the~
:ontract antl/or contract h'ork arc hereby authorized and as conpensation
:hcrcfor, the following additions ·to or deductions from the ~ontract price are
lercby approvc<l. • ..
. .
Reference: Contractor's Correspondence Dated.
March 4, 1974 ·
Add:
Change material of screen assembly bolts
to stainless.steel
Furnish new 600 amp circuit breaker for
G.E. motor control center
Revise motor mount.on new line bottom screw
feeder to fit existing hopper
Install new ~upports at shaker screens and
modify mounting beams to ~rovide clearance
for new screenings conveyor.
Provide·new incinerator flame control system
for existing incinerators in accordance
with·applicable safety·regulations
Construct masonry closures at openings in
Plant Water Pump Station·building to
provide greater weather tightness
ADD
· ADQ
ADD
ADD
ADD
ADD
TOTAL ADD
Extension of Contract Time:
Due to operational requirements and in
order to perform the above additional
work the contractor is hereby granted
an· extension of contract time of
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION
C-1
109.00
1,o:n.00
129.00
175.00
_1, 60 0. 00
150,00
$ 3,194.00
159 calendar days
159 calendar davs
COU!ffY SA:JIT,\TIO:~ DISTI~ICTS OF OR.M\GE cou~:TY
P.O. Box 3127 -108~4 Ellis.Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE ORDER c.o. KO. 2 F. T. ~iebatth and ZiPh~rth ~ ~lper CO:~T RAC TO I\: _...,.\_.._ro_j n~t-\.._r n_..r..._, • ...... « 1.._1 ri...ic.__ _________ _ DATE .\brc h I.) ' : :) ' ::t
JOB: Increased Water Reuse Facilities at Plant Na 2, Toh No T-4 -1
Summary of Contract Time:
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension This Change Order
Total rime Extension
October-26, 1972
300 calendar days
August 22, 1973
159 calendar days.
21~ calendar days
519 calendar days
March 29, 1974
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
.·
•
~ -
Ho ··d authori za ti on date:
...,,,., March 13, 1974
By
----------------..C-o_n_s_u~l-t_i_n_g __ E_n_g_1_n_c_c_r
By
------------------------------~----Contractor
AGENDA ITEM #17(c)
Original Contract Price $ 611,000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes ·$ 13,643.47
This Change (ADD) (~~~N~4) $ -------3,194.00
Amended.Contract Price s 627,837.47
C-2
Approved:
COU~TY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By
--~--------------------,c-1-11~c-f~·~[~:1-10-1~·n-c-c~,r
L•
ALL DISTRIC'l'S.
•
PROGRESS REPORT
TREATMENT PLA~'T PROJECTS
P2-11-l -HEADWORKS "C" EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2 -($1, 261, 693)
NEW MAIN SEWAGE PUMPS: Operational.
NEW BAR SCREENS: Operational.
NEW GRIT CHAMBERS: . Operational.
NEW GRIT WASHER: Operational.
NEW METER VAULT: Operational.
FOUL AIR SCRUBBER: Operational.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFOR'~IA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVE!':L'£
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFOR!\.:A 9::'.~03
(714) 54')-2910
(71""1 962-241 I
REHABILITATION OF HEADWORKS "B": Deteriorated concrete has been removed and surface
gunited. PVC lining is being installed.
Contract approximately 98 percent' complete to date.
I-8-3 -INFLUENT METERING ~\ID DIVERSION STRUCTURE ($1, 485, 679)
INFLUENT CHANNEL: Complete.
INFLUENT PIPING: Euclid and Sunflower Trunk bypasses in service. Completed junction·
structur~s on .Newhope-Placentia and District No. 1 trunk lines. Interplant Influent
Intercepror, Ellis Force Main, Newhope-Placentia, and Sunflower Trunks have been
connect~d to structure.
METERING AND DIVERSION STRUCTURE: Underground structure complete. Backfilling area.
Installing equipment. Erected wall panels for control building. Installing meters.
Contract approximately 79 percent complete to date.
P2-20 -POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT PLAi"IT NO. 2 -(158,294)
No further onsite work is expected until sufficient equipment has been delivered to
complete peripheral lighting and control installations.
Contract approximately 58 percent complete to date.
AGEIJDA ITEM #22 D-1 ALL DisrrRICTS
Progress Report
Treatment Plant Projects
Page Two
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS A\~·.:,!.:
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CAL1;::;·~~;1A 9~:'~~
(7: .q ~ .11.: i; ~
(71Jl 96:-2.tl I
Pl-9-1 -ADDITIONAL SECONDARY TREATMENT AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 -($814, 943)
DIGESTER GAS COMPRESSOR: Operational.
NEW INCINERATOR, CONVEYOR AND RAMS: Operational.
PLANT WATER PUMP STATION: Operational.
TRICKLING FILTER: Operational.
CITY WELL WATER PUMP STATION: · Operational.
NEW WELL: Operable.
Contract work complete.
P2-21 -DIGESTERS ''N" AND "0" AT PLANT NO. 2 ..:. ($1,076,514)
....,. DIGESTERS "N" AND "0": Installing piping and equipment on digesters. Filling
digesters in.preparation for testing.
DIGESTER CONTROL BUILDING: Installing p~ping, electrical switchgear and sludge
recirculation pumps and heat exchangers.
TUNNELS: Installing piping.
DIGESTER GAS COMPRESSORS: Completing installation.
STORM WATER PUMP STATION: Structurally complete. Waiting for pumps.
PAVING: Rough grading for paving.
Contract approximately 79 percent complete to date.
J-13 -SHOPS AND WAREHOUSE FACILITIES -($1,061,989)
SHOP A: Installing plumbing and electrical. Installed bridge cranes. Installing
mechanical equipment.·
SHOP B: Installing plumbing and electrical. Installed-bridge cranes. Installing
mechanical equipment. Texturing walls.
WAREHOUSE: Installing heating. Installing plumbing and electrical.
SITE: Rough grading. Curbs and gutters completed. Paving scheduled shortly.
Contract approximately 69 percent complete to date.
AGENDA ITEM #22 D-2 ALL DISTRICTS
'
Progress Report
Treat~~nt Plant Projects
Page Three
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENI_::
FOUNTAIN VALlEY, CALIFORNIA 927'-"
(714) 540-29 i 0
(714) 961-241 1
J-4-1 -· INCREASED WATER REUSE FACILITIES AT PLANT t\O. 2 -($624, 643)
CITY WATER PmtP STATION: Operational.
CHLORINE WATER PUMP STATION: Operational.
PLANT WATER PUMP STATION: Completing electrical and mechanical work •. Ready to test.
CHECK VALVES AT ROTHROCK PUMP STATION: Operationa1.
SHAKER SCREENINGS CONVEYOR AND HOPPER: Operational.
INCINERATOR CONTROL SYSTEM: Installing new flame control system.
Contract approximately 99 percent complete.
TREATMENT P LA!'IT-.·WORK
Total Value Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Total Work During February
Total Work Out for Bid
Total Work Under Design
DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK
To·tal Value Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Total Work During February
Total Work Under Design
March 7; 1974
AGENDA ITEM #22
$ 6,514,650
5,509,267
. 357,742
26,250,000
800,000
$21, 975' 119
14,058,250
744' 135
21,281,200
TOTJ\L AMOUNT UNDER CONI'RACT & DESIGN
D-3
$ 6,514,650
26, 250 ,_ooo
800,000
$21,975,119
21,281,200
$76,820,969
ALL DISTRICTS
'-"
l..UUn l I .:>.:\.• l 11\ l 1 u.-. JJ l .:> 11 ... J \. l;, \.11· v;·_,\ •• u1~ ~uv.,,'
P • 0 • Bo x 8 1 2_7 -1 0 0 -1 • l L 11 i :; , \ v e u u c
Fount~ in Va 11 c y , Ca 1 i for n i a ~l 2 7 0 8
CllA~GE OIWER c. o. ;.;o. 12
~---------~~---~--~-o: t fl V\ CT O~: SULLY-MILLER CO~TRACTINr, CO:-~Pl\:\Y DATE March 13, 1974
OB •• Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation .Plant ~o. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No 2-14-1
Amount of this Ch:ingc Order (Al.JD) (NlOm£~ $ ___ 7 ....... .....,9 9.......,5_..... ___ 0 ___ 6
t . .
~ In accordance with c?ntract pr?visions,_thc following change~ in the
ontract an<l/or contract worK arc hercny authorized antl as conpcnsat1on
hcrcfor, the following a<lditions to or dc<luctions frora t11c contract price arc
ercby approvcu. • ..
Upon notification of the Dist~ict by the Orange
County ~load Control District, it was found that
the rip-rap P.rotection of the Orange Subtrunk had
been washed away from its. crossing of the· Santa
Ana River. The contractor was directed to
replace this rip-rap in order to protect this
seweF from wash out.
.·
ADD
TOTAL ADD
..
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
$
1, g g 5. o·~-
7, 995. 06
$ 6,274,608.40 --------
$ 1,540,579~26 -------------------
This Change (ADD)(NXmNEI) $ 7,995.06 -------------------
Board authorization date:
March 13, 1974
By __________ .-..----------~---r~....---~ Consulting Engineer
By ____________________ __,,~~~~~
Contractor
AGENDA ITEM #46
Amended Contra~t Price 7, 823, 182. 72
..!E-
· App:rovctl:
COU!~'tY SANITATION nI STRICTS of
Oz:~nge County, California
By_·-----------------------------------.---Cluc1 tn~~ in cc
DISTRICT 2
.. --~------
M E M 0 R A N D U r.t
March 7, 1974
TO: Fred A. Harper, General M~nager
FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVE!'.\JE
FOUNT.<\IN VALi f:Y Cl\.L!''_"·l!A 9~.'
(714) 54J-2910 '--"
(714) 962-24 I l
SUBJECT: Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contracts Nos. 2-14-1 & 2-14-2
2-14-1
Completed work on this project extends from Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue with
the exception of 1,000 feet of pipe south of Harbor Boulevard.
A short delay in ·construction was encountered when the owner of Tally-Ho Stables
refused to clear the right-of-way. The problem was worked out without serious
consequence.
The remaining pipe to be laid on.this contract will be completed by ~arch 15th,
including the open cutting ·of Warner Avenue.
2-14-2
Preparation for pipe delivery and construction .has begun 2,000 feet north of
Lincoln Avenue. Excavation for pire iaying will·begin March 11th. Construction
of the pilot tunnel under Glassel Avenue is ne~rly complete. Excavation for the
tunnel crossing at the Riverside Freeway is now underway.
Due to the construction of an industrial complex on Grove Street between La Palma
and the Riverside Freeway after this project was designed and its very close
proximity to the construction area, the contractor proposed that the section of
trunk sewer from just south of·the freeway to La Palma be realigned to the west
to avoid this area. The land to the west of this industrial area is vacant and
for sale. A developer made an offer for this land and had a plot plan showing
the location of future streets. One of these streets would have acconunodated
the sewer very wel,1 and the developer was willing to let the Contractor construct
the sewer in this area in exchange for constructing the street which would
ultimately be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. The offer the developer made
to the owner of.the property was turned down. If the developers offer had been
accepted, and the sewer relocated to this area,·there would have been a considerable
savings to the District in that the Contractor's construction costs would have
been reduced and part of this saving would have been passed on to the District.
As it stands now, the Grove Street alignment will be used.
REL:BEW:ss
AGENDA ITEM #50 -F-DISTRICT 2
()t.
z
t-z ·.,
<1 ti _. t
CL l 1 l
@
• •I
' • • 1 ..
'·
1 1? c 8 ..... .F.
Lf6EN O
-.. _ .. L;N O Or=
-·""'"""' 0 PIZOJ1.'l'.:-T
-~~C~O~N~1~~~A~C~T~~~~~-~14~-~1~~~5~A~N~T~A~A~N=A~K=N=f=R~!N=1=E=~=~=f=F=T=O=&~~~·m~m u m u m ~•~~~ ~ 5AN1A AN~~l ~f~ l ~~RCfP~R
M lL ~soi= 84''f l P~: 8 1p.z
----coupLi=1 r=-CoNTtZAC1 AWD.'Z.Of:O : 0)-~-/'Z
1v.1 1. 1. COST:$C:01 "Z74 1<&>0 & ••••• TO Be=-CON5T~UC1e:D <OCHe'"OJ L.e'"O 1=oR CDM Pl.fTION : <D-Vi?-74
. ...:..
I
L f6e'"N D
CoM Pt..!: if
••••• 1'0 e~ CONS1~uc:Tro
cuu:rrY S:\~: TT.\T 1 :·:: !l 1 STi: I crs r~F o~:.\~:.~r: cou:;ry
P • U • to x ~:>l :: 7 - l U ,") · t • i L 11 i s . \ \. (• 11 u c
Fount'ain \'all<.!y, Caliior11ia·~2708
. c. 0. :-:o. 3
:o;~'fl.~.ACTOi~: J. F .. Sn ea Comp 3 ny, Inc . DATE ___,,~~1~-r-c~h~b~.-,--1-9~7-4~--~
JOB: Knott Interceptor, A Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 & 3, Contract ~o. 3-17
Amount of this Ch:ingc Order (ADD) (NXNMEY) . $ 38, 6 ~ 7. 3 3
~ In accordance .with contr:ict provisions, the following changes in the
:ontract r?.nd/or contract ,;ork arc hereby authoriz.c<l and as conpcnsation
~hcrcfor, the following additions to or dclluctions fror.i the c.ontract price are
nercby apprpvcJ. :· .
. Add:
The Contractor was directed.to place
one additional foot of rock from
Stations ·1"87+20 to. 190+29 and ·two
additional feet of rock from Station
190+29 to 192+65 and from 238+37 to
240+10
64 6 c. y. @ $ 7. 5 0
·34 9 C. Y·. @ $ 9. Q 0
.·
$4,845.00
3,141.00
Additional work required· in lieu of
acquisition of right-of-way, street
improvements south side of Ellis
Avenue, retaining wall and other
related work
Removal. and replacement· of·traffic
signals and appurtenant work installed
after award of contract
Additional paving required in the
Cities of Huntington Beach, Westmi~ster
and Fountain Valley resulting from
changed contract conditions and
Utility adjustments
·Modifications required for the cqnnection
of Contracts Nos. 3-18 and 3-17-1 at
the north terminus of the project
Removal of bulkhead installed on
Contract.No. I-8, Interplant
Inf lue~t. Interceptor
AGENDA ITEM #55(a) G-1
ADD : 7,986.00
ADD 3,428.00
"ADD 2 '8·37. 6 9
ADD . 12,796.99
ADD 3,809.35
ADD· 1,840.00
DISTRICT 3
cou:~TY ~;\:;r~.\TI:::~ in~;·~::1c1·~~ or o:~~\\.;i. crn::TY
P. O. Lox ~)1~7 -10:~-l·l Lllis .• \\'Pn11e
Fountaill \'alley, Calituntla ~~.:i~00
c.o. ;.:o. 3
CO•~Tr-v\CTO~; J. F. Shea Comp~ny, Inc. DATE· -----------March 6, 197J
JOB: Knott Interceptor, A Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 & 3,·contract No. 3-17
• Add: (Continued)
Utility adjustments, raised
manholes to grade, Kater ·
valves, cover replacement,
existing manhole ring and
cover on Miller-Holder Trunk
Hoard authorization date:
March 13, 1974 •
By
--------------~c-o_n_s_u_l~t-1-1-1g--E~~r-1b-,1-n_e_c_r
By ________________________ ~~------
C on tractor
· AGENDA ITEM #55(a)
ADD
TOTAL ADD
•
Original Contract Price
PreV. Auth. Changes
5,929.30
$ 38,627.33
$ 5,755,480.00
$ ______ 7~,_2_2_8_.3_7 ____ _
This Change (ADD) (XJ.'00\tOlX) $ __ 3_8 ..;....' 6_2_7_._3_3 __
Amen<led Contract Price s 5,801,335.70
G-2
Approved:
COUNTY S:\NITATION DISTRICTS of ~
Orange County, California
DISTRICT 3
'--VU n .& I v.: \. t l 1 I\ 1 l \. J... J J .l :> 1 I~ J l. J ~ l I 1 • U ! '.J \. , \JI: ~ U U,, l I .
p • 0 • I~ 0 x 3 1 : 7 - 1 (J 0 . ; I l I : 1 1 i ~ '\ v (' I l iJ c
Fount~ in Va 11 c y , C .:i l i f o rri i a ~J 2 7 0 8
c. 0. 1\0. 4
:o:\TfL'\CTOil: J. F. SHEA CO., INC. DATE -..... f."P""fa_r__,ch-6--.~19~7""""'4.----
roll: Knotc Interceptor, A Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 & 3, Contract No. 3-17
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) ~~J:OU~r.9 $ 10,718.00 . . In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the
:on'?'fact an<l/or contract h'ork arc hcrchy authorized and as conpcnsation
:hcrefor, the following additions to or deductions from tl1c contract pric~ arc
iercby approved. . ..
ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES
ADD: ...
Item Change Est'd Quantities
No. Unit From To
6 L.F. 670 761
11 L.F. 188 334.
21 V.F. 156 217.
22 V.F. 32 67
32 C.Y. 50 86
.DEDUCt:
2 L.F. 10,510 10,502
. ..._,
8 L.F. 306 298
30 Each 3 0
,.
Hoard authorization date:
March 13, 1974
3y----------------..----r------..---------C ons u It 1 ng Engineer
3y ______________________ ~----~---
C on tractor
AGENnA ITEM #55(b)
Diff~rence
91 @ 30.00/L . .F. . 2, 730.00
146 @ 20.00/L.F. 2,920.00
" 61 @ 80.00/V.F. 4,880.00 ·--·
~5 @ 100.00/V.F. 3,soo.oo:
36 @ 40.00/~.Y. 1,440.00
Total Adq: 15,470.00
8 @ 194.00/L.F. 1,552.00
·8 @ 25.00/L~F. .. 200.00
3· @.1000.00/Each 3,000.00
Total Deduct: 4,752.00
TOfAL ADD: 10,718.00
Original Contract Price $ 5, 755,480.00
Prev. Auth. Chan~cs $ 45, 855. 70 ------
10, 718. 00 This Change (ADD) ~'IUiil'Ot!l~ $
~----~~~----~
Amended Contract Price s 5,812,053. 70
·-H-
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATIOl~ DISTRICTS of
Or?,:ngc County, California
By---------------------....-.----------~ ·Clnc1 LJ1C1 lnccr· ~'
DISTRICT 3
cou:;TY S:\~lIT,\T Io:~ DI STI~ I Cf$ or· O!~\::r.r CPY~:J_Y
.. P. O. Box Sl::7 -ltJ,.;.;.J Elli:_; .\vc-nuc
fountain Valley, California ~J:708
CllA:\GE Ol:l>l.R c. 0. :.:o. 5
:o:~rr"ACTorr: J. F. SHEA co. , INC. ------~~~~~--~-DATE March 6. 1'-174.._ __ _
'OB: Knott Interceptor, A Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 & 3. Contract ~o. 3-17
Amount of this Change Order (~~ c~~ro S_....o ...... __ o __ o ____ _
•In accordance with contr~ct provisions, the following changes in the~
.ontract anc.l/or contr-act \·:ork arc hereby authori:o<l and as cor.ipcnsation
hercfor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price arc
:erc~y approved. • ..
Extension of Contract Time
The Contractor is hereby granted an
extension of time due to inclement
weather
The Contractor is hereby granted an
extension of time for work accomplished
in Change Orders 1, 2 & 3
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION
-·-. ----'" .... _ -·-·· -.:--__ ...,,.
Summary of Contract Time
Uriginal Contract Date ·
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Total Extension of Contract Time
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
Original
..
Contract
65 Calendar Days
39 Calendar Days
104 Calendar Days
June 30, 19i2
510 Calendar Days
November 22, 1973
104 Calepdar Days
·614 Calendar Days
. March 6 , 19 7 4
Price $ S,755,480.00
Prev. Au th. _Changes $ 56,573.70
Hoard authorization date:
March 13, 1974
By __________________ __,"r:::-:'.~~~
Contractor
AGENDA ITEM #~S(c)
This Change (Xl01J:j~ $ 0.00
Amended Con.tract Pr ice . $ s,.s12,os3. 10
-I-
Approved:
COUNTY SJ\!\ITATIO!J DISTRICTS of
Orange.County, California . ,.
""' -
RESOLUTION NO. 74-44-3
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-17 AS COMPLE~E
-·A RESOLUTIO~ OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SMJITATION DIS11 RICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT
NO. 3-17 AS CONPLE~E AND APPROVING FINAL
CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
• * ·* * * * * • *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3,
of Orange· county, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, J. F. Shea Company, Inc.,
has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the
contract ·for KNOTT INTERCEPTOR,.A PORTION OF REACH 1 AND REACHES
2 & 3, CONTRACT NO. 3-17, on the 6th of March, 1974; and,
Section 2. That by letter, Boyle ~ngineering Corporation,
:.
District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as
having been completed in accordance· with the terms of the contract;
and,
Section 3. That the Chief· Engineer of the Districts has
concurred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation
is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That Knott Interce.ptor:, a Portion of Reach 1 and
Reaches 2 & 3, Contract No. 3-17, is hereby accepted as completed
in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 30th
of June, 1972; and,
Section 5. That the. Chairman of the Dis·trict is hereby authorized
and directed to execute a .Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with J. F. Shea
Company, Inc. setting forth the terms and conditions· for acceptance
of said Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 & 3,
Contract No. 3-17, is hereby approved; and~
Section 7. That the Chairmari and Secretary of the Board of
Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said ~gree~ent
on behalf of the District.
PASSED Arm ADOFT:m L1t a reculnr meet in[;-held M.::i.rch 13, · 1974.
AGENDA ITEM 1156 -J-DISTRICT 3
•
ME M 0 R A'N DU M
March 7, 1974
TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager
FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
SUBJECT: Knott Interceptor, Contract No. 3-18
COUNTY SANlTATIO~~ D:sT~ .. ~. ~
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVH~l'E
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 921•)
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2.C l 1
The 96" RCP. in Bolsa Avenue between Beach Boulevard and N·ewland
Street has been completed. Construction is presently west of
Beach Boulev~rd and is progressing at a rate of .80 feet per day.
Bol sa Avenue east of Beach is n~:,.w open to traffic in both
·directions. Backfilling and compaction is nearly complete. Base
course paving can be expected by March 15th. Paving over the
first 1500 feet of the project will be postponed to coordinate
with Southern California Gas Company construction.
Bruce Taylor is presently working on the project to minimize the
adverse effects on the public.
REL:BEW:ss
AGENDA rrEM #59 -K-DISTRICT 3
'·-·~~_;r::·!·~ ·~
~L1l .wf.?i.Ml .NSif'.' •tii ltL_J lJLJ LJLJ 1 ~IJ A'lf . IL
_....4 1 .. . · -1 ... r ]GJ D~ ~hri F 1 1 ~~;: "'" 0 PL,,n . 1 ~ 3 . -·----sri ~~ ~_t_J Flfi ltr;
Ho "•< st. ·~~~~~¥JU I
W~TM I N5ifR ·1 m1 ~w!Jl L ;_m,"
~
0
0
0
3
tll g
(5
a
Wf5 1M\N Sif-Z. -I l, ~ ~ j :,~~
0 I ~J o ,-: ... ,.) 2 OJ a ~ ! .-: J: HA'Z .¥!0 l I /j;y ~'. l ~~ tC>A ,, i 1·1···~_,,......... .... ... ... . . I .....___ _ __. ..__
111111 '~~~WN1jj1 I ,;J.1 11~~ .. .. .. ' .. ., . . .
, _ .·. , .. ~: ··~ . 11 COUN 1'Y Dli :;r~·. -..-1" ~ 1·1s \N~i tvq ~"Sje'K . I of{N6f
·: ~ . IQ M1. MU • ..,,A L·
.·1 . '!1· · P Ar2 K
.· ...... -;/l.J f1 . . . VI I . Ui .,.:. ..
:-j I ,... Ill fj) •
-.. . ._: l[l l z til ~ I '1'I z t ,t _ ~ --~ I ~~~ ~ ~ ~
.--i-~_.....~~~~~~..;....~~~~--~.---~~~~
f;J;~w··~ MJ·: u z A LL : ~ ~~ ·~ 0
<f <l t ~ 3 :r: ~1 L.5A b.._ _ · . ..i:;--_-------_---,. . L~u.>u uu 1 _J LJ _uL_ ~~.a aacrr.' 0 -•"· r-. """= -~ -ti"&-
-, , ~ A.vc-, --~ FTw~~1Y;1 g -\ ~rn 1 J \
<! fl 10 RCIN6C iJ fl> I n
CONTl<'.ACT.,, '3-le>"" kNOi T INT e-R Ct'PiO ~ · 1 ' i . ., I J Lf6LN O _
. 'l
COM !0 l f1f
e e e e • To Bf CONSTr<:Uc.TfO
11•u11 11 11 •110 1111 11111111111 111u 11111 111u111•1111u11 ~ k'NOTT ( N \r:RCC'"Pi O~
3 M!Lf'5 o F 0 ~" PIF'f'
CON T lZ /~Ci AWAr<.D.}:-D1 G -1-97?
CO-ST; ~ ~ ~"?'!, -i I~
SCHfOULf0 1F Ot<. CO M PLfil O N: C,-f-7~
~·
'-.
MILLER . NISSON 8 KOGLER
C LAR I'( M I L LE R ATTORN E:Y S AT LAW
201 4 NOR 7 H BROADWA\·
TELEPHON E
C . A RTH U R N I SSON
NE LSON K OCLC:R
AREA CODE 71 4
S A NTA ANA . CA LI FORNIA 9 2706
H . \..AWS O N M E A D
March 11; 1974
TO THE DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 / 7,
8 and 11
5 42-6771
Enclosed please find an Analysis of Governmental
Conflicts of Interest Act as it applies to County Sanitation
Districts and proposed ·Guidelines for your consideration .
. ' My recommendation is to adopt the proposed Guide-
lines and thereby avail yourselves of the immunity to certain
civil penalties should any one of you be sued under the Act.
In my analysis I have Xed out tw9 paragraph s
on page 2 because I revised Sections 3 and 4 in the Guidelines
enclosed.
The effect of the decision of the Superior Court
of Nevada County is discussed in the · analysis. It d oes not
change my recommendation regarding the adoption of the
Guidelines enclosed.
Respectfully submitted,
ed~-).di~
C. Arthur Nisson,
General Couns e l
... _-.. __ CAN:ac
··--... __ _
Enclosures
I '2-
ANALYSIS OF GOVERNMENTAL CONFLICTS
OF INTI:REST ACT AS IT APPLIES TO COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS
Basically there are two parts to this Act. The
first part of the Act (Chapter 3) defines actions which are
prohibited to public officials. It permits local agencies,
such as county sanitation districts, to adopt guidelines not
in conflict or less restrictive than is set forth in the Act
itself.
As a benefit for the adoption of local agency guide-
lines·, a· local agency public official is exempt from the civil
penalties.as provid~d in Chapter 5 of the Act (Government Code
§3751 and §3753) when he or she makes a good-faith attempt ~o
comply with said local guidelines.
The civil penalties provided in Chapter 5 are:
(a) The District Attorney or any citizen, or group
of citizens, may bring an action to. enjoin violations and compel
compliance, i.e. suit in equity for an injunction;
(b) If the Court determines that the public official
~iolated the Act (i.e~ participated in an. act p~ohibited to
him or her by reason of a material economic interest therein)
and realized an economic benefit as a result of the action or
decision, the Court may impose a penalty against the public
official up to three times the value of the benefit realized;
(c) A violation shall be grounds for forfeiture of
office and disqualification from holding public office.
There is one additional civil penalty.that is
applicable if the district adopts guidelines re~uiring statements
disclosing financ~al interests etc. by its designated public
officials. That additional penalty is one up to three times
the value of the o~itted interest which should have been dis-
closed.
The guidelines drafted 2/21/74 and submitted to
the Exe cu-Ci ve Corruni ttee 'comply with the provisions of § 36 26
and, if ~dopted and complied with in good faith, would provide· .
immunity from the above-described civil penalties.
There is one civil penalty which is not avoided
by the adoption of local guidelines. That is the award of
reasopable attorney f~es and court costs to the prevailing
party or parties whether or not there has been a final judgment
in the matter.
Section 3 "S.ubstantial Conflict"
Section 4 Economic Effect" c~n be expand more
precisely spell J ,st what qualifies as s
should be noted to
provide equal application official, e.g. a
$900 interest official with a
$200,000 asset, it becomes 'ficant to a public
official less asset.
believed that the Act itself
make a determination of
3 and 4.
-2-
Section 3700 defines "Economic Inte:r;est" ~s being
a situation where one's personal action or decision will have
a· "material economic effept 11 upo~ any of four categories:
(1) An investment of more than $1,000 in a business
entity, excluding deposits.in banks or savings and loans,
credit u~ion shares, cash surrender value of life insurance
and bonds, unless they are convertible.
(2) An interest of more than $1,000 in real
property, excluding a horn~ or property used primarily for
personal or recreational purposes.
"(3) Any source of income, loans or gifts ·ciggregating
$250.in value within l2 months.
(4) Any business entity in which the public official
..
is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee er holds
any position of management.
The interests enumerated include "°indirect" interests·
defined as ownership by:
(1) The official)s spouse, dependent· children or
agent;
(2) A business.entity in which the official, his
spouse, dependent children or agent, possess more than 50%.of
own~rship; or
(3) A trust in which the public official, his
spouse or dependent children have a present or future interest
worth more than $1,000.
A further exception to· "economic interest" is
where action or decision of the public official affects an
-3-
econonic interest of the official as a member of the public
or significant seg~ent of the public or as a member of an
industry, profession or occupation to no greater extent than
any other such ne~er Gf the public segment of the public or an
industry, profession or occupation.
The second main feature of the Act is Chapter 4 and
deals ~ith disclosure statements. Public 6fficials of local
aqencies, such as the County Sanitation District, are NOT
required to file disclosure statements. A local agency may
adopt guidelines requiring the filing of disclosure statements
disclosing economi~ interests as defined in Government Code
§3700 (see·above for detail) together with any additiqnal informa-
tion required by local guidelines. The statements would have
to be filed each year in April with the County Clerk and within
30 days after leaving office. It would be my opinion that if
adopted they should also be filed in.the office of the Secretary
~ of the District.
If local guidelines regarding the Conflicts of Interest
Act do not require the =iling of a disclosure statement, there
is no possible way to fail to-include an eccinomic interest
inadvertently or otherwise. It is noted that an additional
civil penalty is possible where disclosure statements are
required and an economic interest is omitted.
There is some uncertainty as to whether a person
filing a disclosure statement must enum.erate each source of
income aggregating $250 in value within 12 months when he is
-4-
a professional man, e.g. insurance broker, accountant, doctor,
engin~er, etc. This provision of the Act has been amended by
SB 1340 (which has been signed by the Governor) to provide
that sources of income of more than $250 can b€ stated generally
by naming the business entity rather than specific sources, i.e.
customers, clients or patients. This Act, however, will not
become effective until January 1, 1975~ It does contain a
statement.as follows: ·~The Legislature finds and de·clares
that the amendments effective by thi's Act are declaratory of .
the legislative intent in enacting "The Governmental Conflict
of Interests Act".
It should be noted that this specific portion of the.
Act has been ruled unconstitutional invasion of the right of
·"
privacy by the Superior Court in Nevada County~ Although this
is not the decision· of a· court of record and its decision will
be appealed, it is persuasive and indicative. In view of· the
Act's uncer~ainty, the new legislation and the court decisi6n,
I am of the opinion a statement naming the business entity
from which more than $250 of income -was received would suffice
if disclosure statements are to be made a part of local guide-
lines. .
~·
THE QUESTIONS THE DIRECTORS OF THE COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS HAVE BEFORE THEM ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Whether or not to adopt any local guidelines
regarding conflicts of interest.
2. If local guidelines are to be adopted, the
-5-
following additional determinations must be made:
(a) Who are "public officials" insofar as
the County Sanitation District is concerned;
(b) What additional requirements should be
included, i.e. in excess of State law;
(c) Should disclosure statements be required
as a part of the local guidelines;
(d) What additional information should be
included (i.e. beyond that required in the State law)
in the lo~al guidelines relating to disclosure state-
men ts ..
c. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County, California
-6-
H.i::SOl:...UTim~ :~o •
• \ RE.SOLC:'IC~~ O.? 'l'i!B ~301\RD OF DI P.EC'.!:'OTIS
OZ 1I'lL: COL~~;·:iy s;.~HT.:\'I' IO:~ DIS'I' .. ~ICT :·IO.
OF' OR:'\:-:c.: ccc:TY ~"\.D<):'TilIG Ct;ID:··~Lr::!:S FOR
T:iE I::? L:::>~E:-, T ;l,:· Io~~ OF T rn~ {~0\71~ P.~·!~ t~l.~T ELL
co:::a·LIC'.r O? H~TE!lliS'IS ACT
BE IT P.!:SOL'n::D by the Bo~rd of Directors of the
County Sanitation District. iio. _of Orange Cour:ity, Californi:l:
SECTION 1. PCP.POSE l\ND EFFECT
Pur3uant to Section 3626 of the Governr:.~mt Cotle (all.
Section references herein are to the G6vernnent Code unless
othe~Nise specified) , the Board of Di+ectors of the County
Sanitation District No. of Orar:ige County, Cali.fornia ---
hereby adopts the follo~ing guid9lines for its public officials
in determining wh2ther they have. ·an econowic int.crest or interests
which are in substantial conflict with thoir official duties
and powers under Subdivision (a) of Section 3625 ~nd in Jeter-
mining whether they have an econo:nic interest. in ;natters for
purposes of Subdivision (o) of Section 3625.
Nothing contained in this resolution is intended to
modify or abridge the provi3io~s of the Gov~rnrncntal Conflict
of Interests Act (Sectio!1 3600 et seq.), Sections 1090-1097; or
any other provisions of law pert~i~ing to conflicts of inter~st.
This resolu~ion shall be interpreted in a·rnanner consistent
thcrewi th. ~~othing co.r:·~ai!1ed. herein shall be deemed adopted
pursuant to or in imple~entation of Section 3603 or Section
3704.
SEC·TIOi·I 2. D:SSIGtil\.'I'IQl,; OF OFFICIALS
The "rH1blic official3," ''o.::ficials," and :'3lcct.iv~ and
appointive o-ffic·?.rs'' subj<-~ct to the t-)rOV:!.~~!.~J_:.:; r::f Section 3fi25 .'"lre:
1. Board of Directors
2. General .Manager
3 • Chief Er..gincer
4. Secretary
5. County Auditor acting as ex officio Auditor
...,,., of the District
6. Director of ~inance of the J.A.O.
SECTION 3. SUBSTANTIAL CONFLICT
A. An official shall not be deemed to have an economic
interest in substantial conflict with the proper exercise of an
official's duties within the meaning of Government Code Section
3625(a) if he has only a "remote economic interest" and if the
fact of such interest is disclosed t·o the body or Board of the .
District and noted in its official records, and the~official in
no way attempts to influence any oth~r public official.of the
District with respect to any matter_ concerning such remote eco7
nomic interest.
As used in this section, the term "remote economic
interest" means:
1. That of a non-salaried member or officer of· a nqn-
profit corp~ration;
2. That of a director, officer, partner,
trustee, employee or holder ?f any position of management in
any business entity contracting with the District if such business
entity has ten or more other employees and if the officer was
an employee or agent of said entity for at least three years
prior to his initially accepting his office. For purposes of
this subsection, time of employment with the business entity by
the officer shall be counted in computing such three-year period
even though such entity has been con"verted from one form of
business organization to a differ·ent form ~-f business organiza-
tion within thr0e years of the initial taking of office by such
-2-
officer. Time of employment in such case shall be counted only
if, after the transfer or change in organization, the real or
ultimate o:-mership for the contracting party is the same or sub-
stantially similar to that which existed before such transfer or
change in organization. For the purposes of this subsection,
stockholders~ bondholders, partners, or other persons holding an
. .
interest in the business entity are regarded as having the "real
or ultimate ownership" of such entity.
3. That of a parent in the earnings of his minor
child for personal services;
4. That of a landlord or tenant of a business
entity contracting with the District;
5. That of an attorney of a business entity con-
tracting with th~ District;
6. That of a supplier of goods or services to
the District when such goods or services have been supplied to •
the District by such officer for at least five years prior to his
"'-""' . election or appointment to office;
7. That of a person s~bject ~o the provisions
of Government Code Section 1090 in any contract or agreement
entered into pursuant to the provisions of the California Land
Conservation Act of 1965;
8. That of a~ ?fficer, director, or employee
of a bank, bank holding company, or savings and loan association
with which the Districi has the relationship of borrower or
depositor, debtor or creditor;
9. That of a shareholder of a corporation con-
tr acting with the District if less t.han 3 1 ~ of the shares of such
corporation are owned by such officer and total annual income
to the officer from dividends, including the value of stock
qividends from the corporation, does not exceed 5% of the officer's
total annual income, and any other payments made to him by the
-3-
corporation do not exceed 5% of his ~otal annual income.
B. An economic interest in substantial conflict with
the proper exercise of an official's duties within the meaning
of Section 3625(a) shall not be deemed to exist unless the official
would be required .to disqualify himself under Section 3625(b) on
a continuous and regular basis from activities and actions which
constitute a :major and~significant portio·n of his official duties
and the~eby impair his ability to function effectively and fulfill
duties of his office.
SECTION 4. MATERIAL ECONO.MIC EFFECT
An action or decision shall not be deemed to have a
material effect on .an economic interest unless the official has
reason to believe that, by reason of the action or decision, an
investment, or int~rest in real property may increase or decrease
in value, other than negligibly, or a business entity from which
the official derives income or in which he holds a position of
employment or management will gain or lose monetarily, other than
negligibly. A change of less than 1% shall be deemed negligible.
SECTION 5. MINISTERIAL AND CLERICAL DUTIES
Section 3625(b) shall apply only ~o actions which
involve discretion or judgment. It does not apply to actions
which are solely ministerial or cl~rical.
SECTION 6. PARTICIPATION
A. The terms "participate" and "attempt to influence''
as used in Section 362S(b) shall be deemd to include but not
-4-
L>.e limi te<l to partici?ation in deliberations or deb a tc, or
voting on the issue, and the following ~ction:; wh~n related to
the ~erits of th2 issue to be decided on or acted upon:
1. Preparation of oral or ~ritten reports.
2. Pendition o~ orQl or written aJvic~.
3. Testi~ony before ·a public agency.
4. Discussio~s with any officials authorized
to decide o~ assist other public official~
to deciGe the matter.
5. Submissio:i of letters or othar d.ocu .. "TIGnts to
any official authorized to decide or assist
other ?Ublic officials to decide.the natter.
6. Issuance or denial of an of~icial ap2roval.
B. Nothing contained herein or in S~ction 3625 shall
abridge the right of ~my citizen, ·whether or not a public official,
to si.lbmi t information· or e:{pres.s views on the sa:ne basis as any
other private citizen, provided such is done ih public and the
per3on indicates he is acting in a private ca?acity.
C. An official directly involved in a matter, whether
as a party, or applicant, or otherwise may, in his private ca9acit;y,
.d h . I"' • • ~ -l provi e w. atever J..n=or:natJ..on is nec.~ssu.ry anc.. ?Cr.torm any ot~1er
steps which are required of other citiz0ns in the sa~e situation,
individually or by cour.s.el. He :may not, ho~-l-2Ver, discuss the
matter privatel7 with .officials who must decide the natter.
SEC?IO:J 7. NECESSITY
A •. An official shall not be su~j~ct to Section 3623 (b)
with respect to any Ga~ter which cannot ba legally acted upon or
decided without his particip~tion.
B. Section 3625 (b) shall not apply ·where:
1. l'\ statutory quoru:n cannot b~ ac:1ieved by contin1..lance
or ~·Ti ~~in legnlly mandatC!d tim2 lir.1i ts;
-5-
2. r-:o!"e. t~1,~n a .si.mr>lc majority vote L~ rc<"!uircc.I. to t.:lke
a pro~osad action, and the number of offici~ls
entitled to vote is less than the nu~h~r required; or
3. Tha official is, by law, the sole officar who can
perfor~ the a9tion or rna~e the decision.
C. In cases · .. ::iere subsections (b) (1) or (b) (2) ap71ly, all
othqrwise qu3.lified officials shall be entitled to participate.
D. In all cases involving e>:cm?tions hereunder, the
officials shall conply with Section 3625(d).
SECTION 8. DISQUALIFICATION
An official wh.o refrains from acting in accordance
with Section 3625(b) should publicly announce such abstension
but need.not declare the nature of the interest whi~h disqualifies
such o£fic'ial.
5"2.:CTim~ 9. r:·nERPP.ETl•.TION
Any official '·"·ho is unsu::e of his duties i.!nder Section
3625 should sGcure a written opinion fro~ counsel. When said
opinion is complied with in th~ good faith belief that it is ·
consistent with those prqvisions, said action shall be deemed in
compliance with th-2se guidelines, and such official shall be c:xer.ipt ·
from the civil penalties in Section 3751 and the '-. . . sanc·1..ions in
s·ection 3753.
SECTIO~ 10. LIMITATIONS ON ACTIONS
No action shall be brought pursuant to Section 3751
of the Government Code
A. To restrai~ the execution of or to set aside as
void any decision, contract, order, p~r~it,
resolutio:.1 or other official \lction unless the
on th2 Secretary of th-2 Distri~t ~vi chin thirt:/ (]O)
re~~olut~o:'. or other of E.ici.:il ?\cl:io~;
.iJ. To 2~join a~ offici~l
-6-
an o~ficial to comply with the pro?ision of
Division 4. 5 of Ti tlc 1 of th:~ Govcr~ncnt Code
or of this re~olution, U:1less .th~ c-:>:r.plaint or
petition has been filed. and scr..red uithin 180
days after the violation of St:.!ction 36~5 of. the
Govern~ent Code occurr~d.
SECTIO~; 11. SEVERABILITY
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phras~
of th~s resolution is for any reason held.by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect th~
validity of the re~aini~g portions of this resolution. The
Board of Directors hereby declares that it would have passed
this resolution and each s2ction, subsection, sentence·, .clause
and phrase. thereoi, irrespective· of the fact that any one or
more sectio~s, subsections, sentences, claus12 or phrase be
declared invalid.
SECTimJ 12. I:~TECTIVE DAT:S ·
This resolution shall take effect upon its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED .AT A REGULAR .MEETING HELD
-7-
.-
II
--
BOARD S O F D IR ECTO RS
Count y Sanita t ion Di str icts
of Orange County, California
ALL DI STRICTS
JOINT BOA RDS
SUPPLE M E i ~T A L AGE rmA ITE MS
MA R CH ~l 3 J 197 4 -7:3 0 P.M.
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ell i s . A v en ue
Fou n tain Va lley,· Ca l if., 92708
Te lepho nes:
Area Code 7 1 4
5 4 0.-2 910
962-2 411
AGENDA
(1 8) Consideration of Re s olution No . 1 4-40 , accepting
Add i tional Secondary Treatment at Reclamation Plant
No. 1 , Job No . Pl-9-1 , as compl~te ; authorizing
ex ecut i on of a Notice of Comp l et i on ; and approving
Final Clo s eou t Agre em ent . See.page "IV "
(24 ) Co ns i deration of ro ll call vot e motion app r ovi ng .
Jo i nt Operating and Capital Ou tlay Revolving Fund
warran t books for s i gnature of the Chairman of
Di strict No . 1 , and authorizing payment ·or c l aims
listed o n page "I "
DIST RICT 5
( 30) . Consideration of motion approvi ng warrants .
See page "II"
DISTRICT 7
(38 ) Conside r ation of mot i on approving warrants .
See page II III II
DI STRICTS 3 & 1 1
(42) Consideration of mot i on · approving suspense fund
war r ants . See page ".II "
DI STR I CT 11
(4 3) Consideration of motion approvi ng warrants .
See page "III "
DI STRICT 2
(51) Consideration of mot i on approving warrants .
See page u II "
DISTRICT 3
(60) Consideration of motion approving warrants .
See pa g e II II"
WARRANT NO.
. 22339
22340
223,n
. 223 it2
. 22343
22344
22345
22346
22347
22348
22349
22350
22351
22352
22353
22354
22355
22356
22357
22358
22359
22360
22361
22362
22363
22364
22365
22366
22367
22368
22369
22370
22371
22372
22373
22374
22375
22376
22377.
22378
22379
22380
22381
22382
22383
22384
22385
22386
22387
22388
22389
22390
22391
22392
22393
22394
22395
22396
22397
22398 .
22399
22400
t ~-JOINT 10PEFL;;TING .FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Abaco Packa g ing C8rp., Containers $
Advanced Electronics, Batteries
Air Conditioning Supply Co., Freight
Al's Tree Service, Trees Topped·
All Bearing Service, Inc., Belts
Allied Supply Co., Valves
American Chain & Gear Co., Pump Parts
.American Compressor Co., Compressor Parts
American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Technical Manuals
American Lock & Supply, Inc., Hardware
City of Anaheim, Power
Anchor Packing Co., Pump Packing
Apco Supply, Electric Supplies
Appliance Refinishing Co., Refinish Equipment
Arrow Glass & Mirror Co.~ Office Partitions
Barksdale Controls Division, Controls
Barnes Delaney, Engine Parts ·
Bearing Specialty Co., Pump Parts
Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair
Benner Sheet Metal, Inc., Fabricating
Blower Paper Co., Janitorial Supplies
Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams
Broadlick Art Supply, Drafting Supplies
C & R Reconditioning Co., Engine· Repair
Cal-Glass for Research, Inc., Lab Supplies
California Auto Collision, Inc., Truck Repair
California Collator Sales, Binding Supplies
Certified Laboratories, Solvents
College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials
Commercial & C.B. Communications, Co mmunication Equipment
Consolidated Elect. Distr., Electric Supplies & Conduit
· ( MO 1-9 -7 4 )
Consolidated Reproductions, Printing
Constructors Supply Co., Tools & Hardware
Control Specialists, Inc., Regulator
Copeland Mot ors, Inc., Truck Parts
Costa Mesa County'Wate~ District, Water
Mr. Crane, Crane Rental
Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage
Curtin Matheson Sc ientific, Lab Supplies
D & C Concrete Pumping Service, Concrete Pumping
C. R. Davis Supply Co.·, Fire Hose
John M. Deck, Engine & Equipment Parts
Deckert Surgical Co., First Aid Supplies
Marvin E. Derfler Co., Pu mp Parts
Diamond C8re Drilling Co., Core Drilling
'Don's Schwinn Cyclery, Bicycles
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies & Printing
Elect Air Tool Co., Incinerator Parts
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Mon itoring (MO 12-14-66)
Engineers Sales Service, Inc., Pump Parts
Ensign Products Company, Lu b ricant ·
Enterpri se Printing Co ., Printing Supplies
Envirotech Corp., Pump Parts ·
Envirotech -Sparling, Me ter Repair
Fi scher & Porter Co., Regulator & Chlorine Parts
·Fo ss Com p any, Foam
City of Fountain Va lley, Wa ter Reimbursement Fee
Willi am H. Fox, Emp l oyee Milea g e
Fra nce Pro ducts, Compressor & Parts
Fre dson, Eq uipment Parts
~re~way Machine & We ld ing , Machining·
Garden Grove Lum be r & Cement Co., Building Materials
I-1
AMOUNT
33.71
50.40
18.96
1,995 \ ]
82 :""r",J
489 .3·8
119. 59
186.46
52.5'.J
42.79 .
20.70
88.2J
47.41
116~00
1,080.00
593.18
1,596.00
201.23
81.95
152.25
248.32
26.00
28 .58
655.00
19.61
207.94
. 75.63
i64.45
446 ~1
111 ~
2,667 .• 66
21.14
260.91
458.96
16.43
. 6 • 0'.)
1,283:51
52.26
41.94
.45.00
905.68
40.19
56 .57
114.71
374 .m)
174.28
640.46
109.10
l,8ono00
173 .46
278.6 8
70.08
16L~. 0 8
106 '-l)
2,066.92
42. 0() .
693.31
27 ._3".)
71 3 .55
19.99
335.6 5
86 9.42
WARRANT NO.
22401
22402
22403
22404
22405
""~4C>6'
~407
22408
22409
22410
22411
22412
22413
22414
22415
22416
22417
22418
22419
22420
22421
22422
22423
22424
22425
22426
22427
22428
22429
22430
')'2431
~432
22433
22434
22435
22436
22437
22438
22439
22440
22441 ..
22442
22443
22444
22445
22446
22447
22448
22449
22450
22451
22452
22453
22454
22455
'-'2456
~~457
22458
22459
22460
22461
22462
22463
22464
22465
IN FAVOR OF
General Electric Co., Electric Supplies $
General Electric Supply Co., Electric Supplies
General Telephone Co.
Georgia Pacific, Building Materials
Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlor·ine (Contract 1-1-73)
Golden West Fertilizer· co., Grit Removal
Graybar Electric Co., Electric Supplies
Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Parts & Repair
Halsted & Hoggan, Inc., Pump Parts
Harbor Fire Protection, Fire Extinguisher Service
Hardware Systems Co., Lab Supplies
·Hardy & Harper, Inc., Paving
Charles G. Hardy, Inc., Hardware
Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal
Hersey Products, Inc., Valves
Honeywell, Inc., Controls, Strip Charts & Meter Repair
Howard Supply Co., Pipe Supplies {M0.1-9~74)
City of Huntington Beach, Water
Inland Nut & Bolt Co., Hardware
Inte·rna·tional Business Machines, Maintenance Agreement
Jensen Instrument Co., Controls
Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies & Fittings
King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, Belts & Boiler Parts
Kleen Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies
Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware
Koppl Company, Piping
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tools· & Hardware
L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Service
The Lacal Company, Inc., Cleaner
Lewco Electric Company, Pump Repair & Truck Parts
A;·· J. Lynch Campany, Trawl Containers
R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., Paving Materials
John McCullough, Employee Mileage
M B Industrial Supply, Hardware
Metropolitan Supply Co., Gauges
E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers
B. Jean Mosher, Employee Mileage
Nashua Corp., Reproduction Supplies
National Lumber & Supply, Inc., Building Materials
Nelson-Dunn, Inc., Engine Parts ·
City of Newport Beach, Water
C. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel Retainer
Occidental College, Ecological Boat Charter
City· of Orange, Water
Orange County Boiler & Industrial Repair, Freight
Orange County Chemical Co., Chemicals ·
Orange County Stamp Co., Office Supplies
Orange County Wholesale Electric, Switches
Pacific Telephone Co.
Ron Parker, Employee Mileage
Norman Parsons, Employee Mileage
Polaris Battery Co., Batteries
Porter Boiler Service; Inc., Boiler Parts
Postmaster, Postage
Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileag~
Quikspray, Inc., Pump
Radio Products Sales, Inc., Meter Supplies
Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal
Red Valve Company, Inc., Freight
The Register, Annual Subscription
Gordon E. Reid Drafting, Drafting Services
Republic Supply Co. of Calif., Hardware
Robbins & f·Iyers, Inc., Pump Parts
SGA Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies
Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing & Drafting Supplies
I-2
AMOUNT
141.77
791.11
1, 2·J7. 05
822.53
4,496.73
~,2~8.0J
293 .68
202.J3
489.83
29.93
186.07
285.0J
144.08
140.0J
52.03
458.99
6,517.27
17.03
1,444.85
12.82
277.25
1,124.58
159.41
281.53
97.72
511.43
371.57
l,722.10
47.39
71.1()
146 .1~8
448.29
110.16
7.88
289~28
2,018.69
21.75
118.31
·61.04
36.60
399.99
80::>.oo
375.0:>
29.19
16.45
75.29
.7.46
84.53
462.41
15.60
6.3::>
322.01
32.61
500.00
49.14
1,197.0:>
23.0:>
40.0:)
14~75
33. O'J.
136 .0')
38.12
113.93
82.TJ
185.35
WARRANT NO.
22466
22467
22468
22469
22470
22471
22472
22473
22474
22475
22476
22477
22478
22479
22480
22481
22482
22483
22484
22485
22486
22487
22488
22489
22490
22491
22492
22493
22494
22~95
22496
22497
22498
22499
22500
22501
22502
22503
22504
22505 22506 ..
22507
22508
22509
22510
22511
22512
22513
IN FAVOR OF
. Santa Ana Electric Motors, Elect. Motor & Motor Rewind $
Santa Ana Electronics Co., Electronic Supplies
Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies
City of Seal Beach, Water
Security Industrial Supply Co., Flanges
Shaw Pum? & Supply, Inc., Pump & Pump Parts
Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies
A. H. Shipkey, Inc., Truck Tires
John Sigler, Employee Hileage
Fred Sinasek, Employee Mileage
Smith Optical Service, Safety.Glasses
·so. Cal Sign Co., Sign
South Orange Supply, Pump Parts
Southern California Edison Company
Southern California Gas Company
Southern California Water Company
Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water
Speed-E Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Stanco Mfg. & Sales, Inc., Truck Repair
Standard Concrete Material, Inc., Concrete
Standard Oil Company, Gasoline & 011
Stang Hydronics, Inc., Pump & Pump Parts
T & H -Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Rent"al
Bruce Taylor, Project Report Expenses & Employee Mileage
Taylor-Dunn, Equipment Parts .
39 Stake & Building Supplies, Survey Supplies
Triangle Steel & Supply Co·., Steel ·
J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Hardware
The Tustin News, Bid Notice -Truck Bodies
U. S. Equipment Co., Inc., Compressor Parts
Un.ion Oil Co., Ga so line
United Au.to Parts, Truck Parts
United Reprographics, Inc., Printing & Drafting Supplies
Utilities Supply Co., Tools
Vaniman Camera, Photo Processing
John R. Waples R.S., Odor Consultant
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc., Engine Parts & Gaskets
West Coast Industries, Building Materials
Western Corp., Electric Supplies
Western Salt Co., Salt
Western Wholesale Co., Equipment Parts
Wilson Ford Sales, Truck Parts
Russell Wold, Employee Mileage
Wood's GMC, Inc., Manual & Truck Repair
Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage
Xerox Corp., Office Supplies & Reproduction Service
Zodiac Paper Co., Prlnting Supplies
Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting & COD Expenses
AMOUNT
572.82
17 .59
lT:>.48
8.88
387.67
373 r rr '=.
1,094.~
72.16
35.70
37.38
32.71
41.48
107.19
28,463.52
1,487.06
3.21
41.16
323". 37
123.18
911.70
2,525.14
1,807.05
247.50
106.25
41.00
34.34
286.35
56.26
8.96
810.67
124.0 Si
358~
1,230.76
93.72
. 69 .96
218.10
260.38
84.52
309.60
96.20
211.49
.13.67
40.14
357.19 . 31. 50
1,215.20
10.1. 71
160.35
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING $ 101,691.51
I-3
WARRANT NO.
22514
22515
22516
"~517
~518
22519
22520
22521
22522
22523
22524
22525
22526
22527
22528
22529
22530
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
B & J Construction Co., Contractor PW-032 $
Bassett Office Furniture, Office Equipment
James G. Biddle Co., Test Equipment
John Carollo Engrs., Engineering -Plant Construction
Ducommun Metals & Supply Co., Tools
E.T.I. & Kordicl{, Contractor P2-ll-l & I-8-3
Ficker Architects, Architectural Services J-13
City of Fountain Valley, Plan Check Fee J-13
Grillias, Pirc, Rosier, Alves~ Architectural Engr. Pl-16
Hemisphere Constructors, Contractor P2-21
James E. Hoagland co-. & Hoagland Engr. ·co., Contr. Pl-9-1
Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. & Monteleone & McCrory, J-10 Suit
Set.tlement ( i-IO 12-12-73)
J. Ray Construction Co., Contractor J-13
Richard Terry & Associates, E.I.R. 73-74 Project Report
Twining Laboratories, Testing P2-21, I-~-3 & J-13
United Reprographics, Inc., Plans & Specs Pl-16
F. T. Ziebarth & Ziebarth & Alper, Contractor J-4-1
AMOUNT
3,089.50
328.44
39Q.ll
55, L~7l. l8
159 .60
101, 96::). Q:)
2,929.50
385 .OQ
i, 298. 75
54,105.31
18,Jl2.62
40,000.00
180,538.13
2,65C) .0)
121.Q:)
11,323.20
2, 555. 2·:)
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING $ 475,317.54
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF $ 577,009.05
I-4
DISTRICT NO. 2
WARRANT NO.
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
. 22531
22532
22533
22534
22535
22536
22537
22538
22539
22540
22541
·22542
22543
22544
22545
John Carollo Engineers, Los Alisos Feasibility Study $
Clean Water Consultants, Phase II Anaheim Forebay
Kasler Corporation & L.H. Woods & Sons, Contractor 2-14-2
Lowry and Associates, Engineering Service 2-14-3, and
Construction Survey 2-14-1 and 2-14-2 .
Sully Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 2-14-1
Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Inspection 2-14-1
DISTRICT NO. 3
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
State of California, Annexation Process~ng Fee 3D & 3E
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF.
$
Boyle Engi~eering, Engineering Se+vice 3-17 & 3-19,
Construction Survey 3-17 & 3-18, Design Survey 3-19 $
Jenkins Construction Company, Contractor 3-12-1
Testing Engfneers, Inc., Pipe Inspection 3-18
A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Saliba Co~, Contractor 3-18
Twining Laboratories, Concrete· Testing 3-18
DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11
SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS
. IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Service 3-17
J. F. Shea Co., Inc., Contracto.r 3-17
DISTRICT NO. 5
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
City of Newport Beach, Connection Fee Collection
II
$
$
$·
$
$
&\10UNT
1,031. 23 .
18' 951. 28
4,387.50
15,838.75
354,693. ~
1,118.00
445.00
21,055.75
11,256.80
1,482.00
151,209.90
14.75
185,019. ~
185,464.20
·11, 465 ~ 00
119,933.33
131,398.33
304.30
.. . " ......
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
22546
22547
22548
22549
22550
22551
22552
22553
22554
22555
22556
....,,.,,
22557
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Service
State of California, Annexation 36 Processing Fee
State of California, Annexation 35 Processing Fee
FIXED OBLIGATION FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
City of Anaheim, Annual JOS Payment
City of Buena Park, Annual JOS Payment
City of Fullerton, Annual JOS Payment
Garden Grove Sanitary District, Annual JOS Payment
City of ta Habra, Annual JOS· Payment
City of Orange, Annual JOS Payment
City of Placentia, Annual JOS Payment
City of Santa Ana, Annual JOS Payment
DISTRIC'l' NO. 11
-ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Kordick & Son, Inc., Contractor 11-12
III
AMOUNT
25.50
70.00
70.00
$ 165.50
$ 1,561.80
96.70
1,561.80
241.80
386.90
1,474.70
241.80
4,434.50
' $ 10,000.00
$ l0,165.50
86,959.35
RESOLUTION NO. 74-40
ACCEPTING JOB NO. Pl-9-1 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. Pl-9-1
AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT
AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3 ,. 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, James E. Hoagland Co. and
Hoagland Engineering Co., A Joint Venture; has completed the construe-
tion in accordance with the terms of the contract -for ADDITIONAL
SECONDARY TREATMENT AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. Pl-9-1, on
the 7th of ~arch, 1974; and,
Section 2. That by letter, John Carollo Engineers, Districts'
engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been
completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and,
Se~tion 3. That the Chief Engineer of the Districts has
~
concurred in said engineer's recommendation, which said r~commendation
is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That Additional Secondary Treatment at Reclamation
~lant No. 1, Job No. Pl-9-1, is.hereby .accepted as completed in
accordance with the terms of the contr~ct therefor, dated the 26th of
October, 1972; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby
authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with James E.
Hoagland Co. and.Hoagland Engineering Co., A Joint Venture, setting
forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Additional Secondary
Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-9-1, is hereby
approved; and,
Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of
Directors of District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to
execute said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 13, 1974.
AGENDA ITEM #18 -IV-ALL DISTRICTS
. MEtTING DATE Marc h l 3 , 1 9 74 TIME . 7:30 p .m. DISTRICTS 1 ,2 ,3 ,5,6,7 &: 1 1
DISTRICT l
.(GARTHE) •••.. PATTERSON •• S/\, _L_ _+ __ _
. (CLARK ) ••.• BATTIN •.••• C-.o . ~ _+ __ _
. . RI MA ...•.. ("'\SI? __:L_ -+ --
(LANGLEY) •.•• SALTARELLI .1\J~ _/_ -----
DISTRICT 2
($~'"=YENS ) •••• NEVIL •••.• ~~.W. _.; __ .+ __ _
!E:~NG) •••••• CHAPUT .•••• ~I ~. _.; -----__
) •••• CLA RK ••... ~ • _.1 __ -+-__ _
LANGER) ••••• FINNELL. .• f~A~ _/ __ +_· _. _
FOX) •••••.•• MAC KA HJ ••• ~~e~ _./ ___ -__ _
PATTERSON) •• GARTHE •••• ~!}. _.; __ +-· __ _ · ·scorr r:v .1 -+-· · · ...... ········------. PERRY ••••• G.6.~Q _I ___ -__
(\4/00D) •• ROOT •••••• fV<. _I _ -~-__
(PE REZJ •••••• TEMPLE •••• [)!( .. _/_ .::..___ __
(DUTTON) ••••• STEPHENSON f\~JA. __!!:;:__ ___ _
(DUNNE) •••••• WINN •••••• }Jf . _:!_ _+ __ _
DISTRICT 3
MAC KAI~ ••• FOX •••••••• ·"---_ ..... __ _ ~ ) · g(({A ti .
CLARK ) •••• BATT! N •••• (}. •• _v ___ + __ _
(SALES) •••••• BLACKMAN •• ~~. __::!_ ~ __
(MEYERS) ••••• DAVIS ••••• ~f.D _1_..,_-4-__ _
EDY.I AR DS ••• ~ • _1 ___ -__
!PATTERSON) •• GAR TH.E ••.• ,s .. _./ __ + __ . _
MATNEY) ••••• GREEN ••••• Ht>.. _1 ~ _+_· __
BROWN) •••••• HYDE ••••• .k~.t\L _; __ + __ ·_.
(NU I JENS) . MAR SHOTT · ·~~ _.;_ --· ----·.
PERRY •••••• C:>;i>_; ___ ---·
(FRANl<I EWI CH) 6~ ••• C.{f . I ~ · 1v· 'D < .. RO OT •••••• f.u.L. -" --+---
fii:r(LI NDENJ •• SCOTT •••• .f\ I • . ==
DUTT ON ) ••••• S TEPHEN SO N ~fll . v .
ROBERTJc) •••• STEVENS ... h~µ. -/-~---k41 eb,\ ----. --. • •••• BYRNE •• _/ _ _.:!::__ __
DISTRICT 5 ·(\
(CROUL) •••••• MC INNIS •• t-!f;. __!.___!_ ___:\ --
(BAKER) •••••• C-hARJ< , • ·~~. + _-1-_ --·
KYMLA •••••••• ----=---
DISTRICT 5
PORTER ••• fft,\~D. _.; ___ -_· -
<CLAR K ) •••• BATTIN •••• ~ •• _/ __ .i.._. _J_
lMC IN N I S ) ••• STORE ••••• N.~. _.;_ ---/ __
DISTRICT 7 JM qv6~~ -· -. I
(PERE Z)····· ·JACKMAt~ • .6.ffr.. _j/_(_+_ --
( ) ····CLARK · · · • .~. • ;_L.!.f. -..\..---
(GA RTHE ) ·····PAT TERSON .s.A. • _{jl ..±_ --
PO RTE R •.• fif\~0. _Ll -----(BURTOf~) .... ~ ... l.~'i . ~ \ ~:;--
(Mer·} NN I S ), •. ~·. · .t:.l f;>. -.;------
(L J'.1 foLE Y: ~ ••• .::.i 1\L 1 ARE~LI 1U.'~. --\" _ _) ---
P-ffi8JD-1 1 ~~ ., ~{ ~· / .
(M ATNEY) ..... DUK E · ••.• ,l,f?. ---_-4 __ _
(CL AR I< ) •••• BAKER · • · • · U · ~ ___ ____::-__ --
(MA.TN E Y) ..... G I BBS ·····.!+~.-----~ --
DJ STRICT 8
MITCH ELL····· -------
( ) ••.••. CLAR I< · ••••• ----· _____ _
HOLM·········-· -------·
JOINT BOARDS
!L ANGE R) •••••• FINNELL ••••. __:!__ __
CLARK ) ••••• BAKER •••• _···+--·
CLA RK ) ..... BATTIN .... ~. __
) ./ -SALES ••••••• BLACK MAN •••• ___ _
(EWING) ••••••• CHAPUT.::::: ~ ====
( ) ..... CLARK .. ; .... ./ .
(MEYERS) ..... DAVIS ....... -./--. -
(MATNEY) •••••• DUKE .••••••• -./---
. EDY.IARDS ••••• -,;---
MAC KAIN) ••• ".Fox ••••••••• -/---
PATTERSON) ••• GARTHE •••••• -.1 ---.-
MATNEY} •••••• GIBBS .•••••• -./---
MATNEY) •••••• GREEN ••••••• -/---
BROWN) ••••••• HYDE •••••••• I ===
. ) ....... SCOTT .. .-. . . . /
FOX) ••••••••• MAC KAIN •••• -/.---
MC I N N IS) .... kYMLA •••.••• ~ ./ ===
NU I JENS) MAR SHOTT. • • • .! .
!CROUL) ••••••• MC INNIS •••• -/---
STEVENS) •••• ·.NEVIL ••••••• ;---
GARTHE) •••••• PATTERSON ••• -/---
p ERRY ••••••• -./---
. · · PORTER •••••• -.;----
(BURTON) ••••• : ~R ••••• -/---
RIMA •••••••• -./.---
~FRANKI~WJCH). CTACA'r'O ••••• I ·==
.M~J '( .. ·.~e arns ..... .
WOO D J ••• ROOT •••••••• ~ --.
LANGLEY) SALTARELLI •• -1----
!HOLLI NDEN) ••• SCOTT ••••••• -.1---
PEREZ)~ .••••• TEMPLE •••••• ~ --
DUTTO N ~~ ••• ~ • ~TE;'~ ~NS~N. • If-====
!ROB ERT~ J ~ •••.• ;, TE Vt NS .••.• _:{_ __
MC INN~SJ •• , .STORE ••••••• I
. • , ••••• BYRNE . · .• -. -..1---
DUNNE).". ••••• vfl NN ......... -,-. --.
PE REZ ) I I I I I I ,JACKMAN. I. I -r --
OTH tRS
HARPER
SYLVESTER
LEWIS
DU NN
CLA RK E
TAYL OR
BROWN
NIS S ON
BLISS
BOETTNER
CA RL.SON
FIM STER
GA LL OWA Y
HOH EN ER
HO WARD
HUNT
KEITH
KE NNE Y
LYN CH
MADDOX
MARTIN SON
P I EF(S ALL
STEVE NS
.--·--
-;--r .;·
_,; --
MEETING DATE Ma rch l 3 , 1 9 7 4 TIME 7 :]0 p .m. DISTRICTS 1 ,2 ,3 ,5,6 ,7 & 11
DIST RICT 1 @. JOIN°T BOAR DS
(GA RTHE ) •.••. PA TT ERSON.~~. ,/ .±._ --
( CLA R K ) •••. BA TT I N •••• Y,, • V-.±__ --
RI MA ••••• 't~Q V -r __
(LANGL EY) •••• SA LT ARE LLI :J'IJS. ~-----
DI STRIC T 2 1 '>
(s -·--:vENS) •••• NEVI L .•••• !;"~.~.±:__ --
IE:)..{NG) •••••• CHAPU T •••• ~H-. _L !L.:::: --
) •••• CLARK ••••• ~~. --lL. ...:!:___ __
L ANG ER) •••• ". FI NN ELL.·· ~~ '5-+----·
FO X) •••••••• MAC-l<A IN •• '1.t"'-~ __
PATTERSON) .. GARTHE ••.• ~~. _i,.L .±___:__ __
•••••• SCOT T ••••• FY'. _lL -4::--__
PERRY •••• -~~~.o L/" ~ __
<woon) •• ROOT •••••• F'-! ~ .J::._ __
(PEREZJ •••••• TE MPL E .••• Off~ ~ .±..__ __
(DUTT ON) ••••• STEPHENSON '!ii! 4..1 ~ __
(DUNNE) •••••• WINN; ••••• Yf. ~ ±_ _._
DIST RIC T 3 . r~ ,
(MAC KA I ~ ) • • • F 0 X • • • • • • • '5f.l A. ....J.L __-::_ · __
(CLARK ) •••• BAT TI N •••• ~. -tfi-_±__ __
(SALES )\ ..... BL ACKMAN .. ? . --=· __
.(MEYERS J ••••• DAV I S •••.• 'P ?. -=:;::;z--.:.±:::_ __
Em'/ ARDS •• /~C_<.9 _L __:: __
(PATTERS·ON) •• GAR THE .••• ~L ~ +:-
~MATNEY) ••••• GRE EN •• · ••• tl v ...±::__ ==
·) ko c:. I . / BRm'/N •••••• HY DE ••.•••••• -1L.._ ...t_ __ .
(NU I JENS) MARSHO TT · .~+r~ -i.G-"---== --.
PERRY ••.•• G~J-P -
(FRA NK I EWI CH) ~O ..• ~i~ \./ ..±___ ==·
( ~·· "'D ) •• ROOT •••••• f!t; ~ ....±._ __
(H'O"'lLIND EN) •• SCOTT ••••• fY . ~-+
(DUTTO N) ••••• STEPHENSON ·.A~J 7 a_,, == (ROB E R T~) •••• STEVE NS ••• ~:~·, ---:t-_. _
( · J. .... BYRNE • • ~ _±__ __
DIST RIC T s·
t z
(CR OUL ) •••••• MC INNI S .• N . ~ ~ --
(BAKER) •••••• GL AR f< .'. ,<;-o(), ~_±_ --
KYMLA ••••• l'I .. ~ _ _:::::: --
DISTRICT 6 • ?... •
.. PORTER ••• ,q'~'~ ~ ~ -·-
(CLARK ) •••. BATT I N •••• ~({~_±::._ --
(MC I NN I S) ••• STOR E ••••• )'\.. --~ --
DI STRIC T 7 -~'t.Qr.--· U i, ~
~PEREZ)····· ·J ACKMAt~ · ·°!;'-· --t?" +---. ~ ) • .. ·CLA RK · .. ••• .. -· -----
(GART HE) ·····PATTERSON ·~~· s:;::~ --·
PORTER •.•• 0~~ c/ ~~ -·
(B URTON ) .••.. ~t'Of{ •.• 1.~11. ~ ~-
(MC IN NIS) •.• ~ •••• ~~. ~___:::-__
(LJI fl.JG LEY) .••. SALTARE LLI J"'i~. --____.::::::--·-
ff ts"f RI CT J.l ~ I
C~ATN~~~-. ·DUKE ······ · ~ .±.__ --
(CU\RK ) ••. ·BAKER ···· .V,,. • /27" :=-__
(MA T NEY) •..•• GI BBs ••.•• t: · -+---
DI STRICT 8 --·----
MITCH El_L· • • • • ------( ) •••••• CL /\R I< .••••. ______ _
HOL M········· -------·
!LAN GER) •••••• FI NN ELL ••••• ~ __ ·
CLARK ) ••••• BAKER ••••••• ~
CLA RK ) ••••• BATTIN •••••• I./ __ .
SA LE S) ••••••• BLACK~AN •••• ~ __
(EWI NG) ....... CHAPUT.::::: L/ --
( ) ••••• CLA RK • • . • • . • t/ --
(MEYERS) ••••• DAVIS ••••••• ---c;-===
(MATNEY) •••••. DUKE •••••••• \./"' __
ED WAR DS ••••• -1.L_ __ ·
MAC KA I N) •••• FO X: •••••••• --1L_ __
PATTERS ON) ••• GARTHE •••••• ~
MATNEY) •••••• GIBBS ••••••• L../' --
MATNEY) •••••• GREEN ••••••• -::;::---.
~ L7'" -BRm~N ••••••• HYDE •••••••• ___ _
_ ••••••• SC 0 TT. • • • • • • vr ·
Fo x) ••••••••• MAC KA I N •••• l.7' --
MC I NN I S) •••• KYM L A. • .. • • • • L/'" ==-~
NUI JE NS) MARSHO TT •••• L-/"
1
CROUL) ••••••• MC I NNIS . • • • ~ --
STE VENS) •••• : NEVI L ••••••• L---"' ==
GARTHE) •••••• PA TTER SON ••• t.--/ .
PERRY ••••••• ~ --
PO RTER •••••• -i..----
(BURTON) •••••• ~ •••• ·...Jc::::__ ==
RIMA •••••••• ~ .~FRANKi EWJ CH).~ •••.• -V---
MC INNIS)~ •• :~R.& .•••• ·==·==
WOOD J •• ".ROO T. • • • • • • • ~
· LA NGLEY) SALTARELLI . ·--LL-===
(HOLLI NDEN) ••• SS~TT .•••••• · l/"" __ (PE R EZ )~ •••••• TchPLE •••••• _iL_ __
DUTT ONJ ~ •••• ,S TE PHE NSON •• ~ __
ROBERTS J "< •••• STEVE NS. : .•• .._.......... __
MC I NN I SJ ••• ,STORE ••••••• t.,./'" J BYRNE · ----.-
. ....... ··~ --
DU NNE) ••••••• WINN ••••••• ·_LL __ ._
p ER EZ) I I I I I I I J~C KMAN I I I I . z:::7 --
OTHER S
HARPER
SY°LVESTER
LE WIS
DU NN
CL ARKE
TAYLOR
B R0\1N
NI SSON
BLI SS
BOETT NER
CARL SO N
F I NSTER
GALL OWA Y
HOHENER
HO WAR D
HUNT
KE I TH
KE NNEY
L YNCH
MA DDOX
M.A.RT !NSON
PIE RSA LL
STEVEN S
••
3/1 3/74 JO I NT MEET I NG
( 4) C!1d..i.rman Finnel l welcomed new 1.Jlrec-cors r·"..'Om Orang;e , Brea and l :::v!ne.
(6) Report of Joint Chairman
Fin nell announced that Water Pric ing Committee meeting scheduled for
March 20th at 5:00 p .m. had been cancelled .
He then cal led a meet i ng of the Executive Committee for 5 :30 p.m .,
Wed~es d ay ,, March 29t~, ~nd !n7!ted Directors MaoKain,·T~mplc & W.i.nt1
t o at tend. '
He also mentioned that two gent l emen who had given l ong years of
ser vice were leaving the Board and enter t ained a motion fo r a
r esolution of appreciation for Di rectors Just and Smith . It was so
mo ved, s econded and carried . The motion was amended to include
D ir ect~rs Kowalsk i , Roberts , Qu i g l ey and all other retiring Di r e ctors .
(7) Repo r t of General Manager
Mr . Harp er reported that the Musk i e Subcommittee on Air a n d Wate r
wi ll be meeting in Honolulu next Monday for the purpose o f looking
a t secondary treatment requirements in Hawaii. At the same time, wi ll
b e considering amending the Act in this a r ea to include some of the
othe r deep ocean dischargers . Sai d he talked to Lindsley Pa r sons ,
o u r Commissioner on SCCWRP and at his insistence , their Pr oject Di rector
is going to go to the hearing on Monday and make some type of a
presentation concerning discharges along the California coast . Said
th i ngs seem to be moving and hopefully, will be hearing something in
the rlext few weeks . Senator Stevens from Alaska has submitted an
amen d ment to the Act g iving EPA Adminis~rator some f l exibility in
aet e rmi ning degree of t reatment necessary .
Said he had some bad news regarding the project rep ort for Improved
Treatment at Plant No . 2 ($270 mill ion over next 10 years). Said
Mr. Hu nt and he had visited Regio n a l Administrator of EPA on the 28th
a n d took along report and EIS and discussed with them some of the
f inancing problems, not just for ourselves but for whole state .
Showe<i--them report and they said they would have to do an EIS which
we a l so submitted . They said if they took our report and just put
a cover on i t , i t would take six months a n d if they wr~te it , would
t ake at least a year . We wi l l just have to wait . Sta:f is working
on some type of a phasing program to go back to them ~~thin the
next few weeks with a pro j ect not more than $20 millivn that will be
going in the right direction but not getting too far ahead with
BOD require ments. Otherwise wou l d be sitt ing here for a year . We
complied with their rul es and then they said they have to do EIS .
FAH also advised that Regional· Wa t er Qua l ity Control Board has give n
us a tentative requirement for us to get our regional permi t and
fo llow pretty much what the EPA and State r equirements a r e f or
di scharge . Do have some problems , particularly with the amount of
monitoring in ocean. Getting too much into the research area . Will
b e a hearing on that on May 3rd . Hope to work with their s t aff and
get someplace .
Clark then asked , in view of what is happening in San Francisco the
last couple days , do we see any possibility of anything lQke that
happening in Orange County? Is it something we s hould start gearing for?
Mr . Harp e r advised that he had gotten a call from Los Ange l es County
Sanitation Districts . They have same u n ion as San Franc i sco . Didn 't
believe this could happen and were concerned about it . With the setup
we have now, we have a group of supervisors with which we feel we ·
could operate the facilities for a reasonable period of t i me . We
do have a two-year agreement with employees with a provision for
"no strikes", but feel we have enough supervisors to operate faciliti i:;;s.
Root asked if EPA h a d any authority in that area a nd FAH answered they
do b u t don 't know wh at t hey can do about i t.
.(8) Repo rt of General Co unsel
Nisson r epo rt ed that during the past month he sp ent some time
ne got iating with the bonding company o f the contractor with which
we a re having some t r ouble . Bonding c ompany stepped i n with enough
rr.c::cy to complete coritract ci.uu meet commitments.
Spent some time on Guide lines. Also new ones which will be in agenda
·n ext month . Don 't have anything pending so wil l h ave i t before next
meeting .
In District 3 have co llected co nnection charges from Green Valley No. 2 .
Took a little nego t iati on and peaceful persuasion. Paid at 6:00 o 'cloc k
the last day .
Attended CASA conference wit h attorneys last F riday . Discussed
guidelines and new legis l at i on whic h will requir e further revision
of environmental guidelines .
t8a) Smith introduced new Directors Joe Temple and Jim Jackman from Orange ,
and said a few words about enjoying having been here for the past
six years.
(10) EDP Committee Rep o rt
Director Stevens reported that the Committee had completed their
study and thanked Dir e ctors Root, Mcinnis and staf f for their work.
Said they included rep o rt in minutes of Executive Committee. Didn 't
send report directly because of postage cost . Summary covers it
quite thoroughly . Then he introduced Jerry Peck a nd Ken Hanna .
Added that regarding i tem 11 of agenda, th e Committee is 1 00%
for adoption of that it e m .
Ken Hanna the n gave his report.
Sm ith asked for de finition of plant mo d e ls , and was answered it is
try ing to identify points within operation .which would have an
affec t on u l timate discharge . Basically , a matter of trying to
evaluate impac t on that discharge .
Re gard ing a ll fees, it was asked i f they were pretty much the same?
Mr. Hanna advised that qu it e a few were outlined in r eport . Tried
to identify them but not evaluate them. Does warrant further
investigation .
Was then asked if it would be bene ficial to have our cwn computer
right about in the middle of the period? Savings wi ~h mini -computer
in house was about $1 0 ,000 . $10 0,0 00 difference between inho use and
outside .
Finnell asked if they were advocating Batch(??) Said no , 'is ava i labl e
but not advo cating anyone .
Clark then stated that in view o f the fact that this was screened
and recommended by the Executive Co mmit t ee , he moved items 3 & 4 and
item No . 11 . Mo tion seconded and carried .
( 12) GC report re 'Conflict of Interests"
Said h~ mailed package regarding this to Directors on Monday .
Recommended that Directors adopt gui de lines sent out and said he
wo uld answer any questions he cou ld. Directors would avail themselves
of e videnc e of c ivil penalties in case anyo n e brings suit against the
Districts b ased on Conflict of Interests Ac t .
Robe r ts as k ed if there had been much talk ab 'Jt Nevada County
throwing this out? Nisson said he didn!t wan t to predic t h ow this
was goin g to come out . Said that those in favor of the Act state
that by r eason of enactment of new bill, thfs will take e ff ect
January 1, 197 5 . $250 gets just a stateme nt fr om your job. Just
a d ec l arat i on of the intent of the o riginal Act . Attempted to patch
up the existing Ac t by the new one . I n s tead o f a n eme r ge ncy Act ,
will take effect Janua ry 1st . Don 't think decision, even if approved,
will throw Act out .
-2-
Finne l l r e fer red to page 2 , Sec t ion 2 , of t h e r e s o lut i on re ga r~i ng
list o f p eop le d e s i g nate d as o ff icial s. Ex ec. Committe e recommending
t h at it be b r o k e n d o1-1tn s e p a rat e l y for e a c h title o f JWS .
Ky ml a a sked r ega r d i n g the Count y Auditor, i s t h e r P. Any t hjne i ~ th ~
body of law t n a ~ set us u p that we could a ppl y this to . Nissan
answ e r ed t hat t he Act specifically names h im e x o ffici o audit o r
for t h e Di stri c t. Hy d e t h en as ked h o w we enfo rc e i t sin c e he i s
ex of fici o . Niss en s ai d n o t to confus e t he s e guid e line s with
other guideline s that h e was not rec omm e ndin g as to declaration of
fina n cial h oldin g s . Councilme n and s u pe r v i sor s wi l l have t o d o that
in their o wn l o c a l e nt ity . See no p u r po s e i n t h at h e re .
Smith as k e6 wh e n t h is should be filed? Nissen answered that if they
accept Gene r a l Co u ns el's recommendat i o n, the y would not file discl o sure
s ta t e me nt f or t he Di stri c t b ut fo r t h eir city in Ap ril.
Duke then a s ked if t here was any particular reas o n why the General
Counsel was l e ft o ff? Finnell said the r e was no s pe c ific reas on
and thought we sh oul d a d d him. Is u p to Direc t ors. Can add or
delete list . ·
Perry then st a ted t hat if they ad o pt this, r e commended t h at the
General Coun sel be added as No . 7 o n the list. Motion was seconded
and carried by voice vote .
Winn as k ed what hap pen s if we don't adopt this? and Nissan replied
nothing, the law is a State law. Don't have to adopt guidelines but
"if you. don't and s o meone sues you and wins, wo uld b e subject to
certain penalties described in letter. If court determines you hav e
acted contrary to A ct~ penalties ma y be imp o sed up to three times the
va l u~ of benefit received by the Act and you would forfeit your office.
Winn then mo ved to take attorney 's recommendation and adopt
resoluti9n, as a mended.
Patterson commente d regarding the disclosure statement required of
. officials wh o are fu ll time e mploy ee s such as tho se desi g nated in
items 2 thr o ugh 7, s aid i n his city they h ave taken action to require
disclosure ·not only of public officials, but also ful l time employees .
in key personnel positions .
Nissen replied that State l aw does not require it o f District officials.
If yuu do add, will have to mak e it ·ror a l l pub li c offi c i als of
Dist ~ictg . If you do that, is an additional penalty that might come
into effect a nd that is if you requ ire discl o sure and fail to disclose
an interest and you should fall into a lawsuit, could be fined three
times the interest made.
Patterson added that he thought that the l aw has probably got
problems with this. Seems that top key personnel are subject to
any discretion the same as elected ofr'icial s. Thoug ht that public
disclosure o f this nature is very impor t ant and said he would like
to so move that Nos . 2 thr o ugh 7 unde r Section 3600 be added to
3700 and, therefo r e , file public d is closure statements. F innell
questioned that he was :eliminating No. 1 and Patterson answe~ed. yes.
Finnell added that not all Directors servi ng here were council men or
supervisors .
Hyde stated that he only had to reveal what was within his city, not
county, but here wo uld have to reveal county-wi de .
Finnell then said he would like to get the amended motion cleared up.
Patterson added t h at this should be referred to staff and report back
at next meeting .
Patterson then said he moved said disclosure
including all p ub lic officials , Nos . 1 -7.
portio n be added to resolutio n
Motion seconded.
Burton stated he just received information that night so would no t vote
until he checked with his city attorney.
-3-
Smith the n asked, wh at if someone did not f ile in their city and th~
Distric t ass um e d that they had, does t hat affect District? Finnell
answered that dis c l o sure wou l d be di f ferent anyway; would be coUnty-
wide her e .
Clar k callea ~or the ques~ion. Ro l l Call vote . Mcinnis indicated that
the question wa s for t ot al Districts' business, so didn't feel decision
could be made by i n dividual Districts . Nissan stated :that it has the
'effect of covering all Districts but has t o be d e cided by each District.
Motion carried in Districts 1, 2, 3 & 11. Failed in Districts 5 , 6 & 7.
(Amended motion)
Chair e ntertained a ~oti o n on ~ai~ mo tion then (r esolution & guiJeli1,e&).
It was so moved, seconded and carried . (Dists . 5,6 & 7)
Baker the n asked, where are we?? and Nissan reiterated that the
Directors in Districts 5, 6 & 7 do not·have to file disclosure
statements for the Sanitation Districts and the other four Districts
do. Nissen added t hat this should apply to mayors and alternates ,
wheth~r mayors serv e or not .
Patterson then said his question first of al l , was what have we done
wi th the staff? Nissan answered that the same disclosure wou l d be
i n effect. Can't disclude any area. Finnell added wi ll have to do
i t within confines of joint Districts.
(13a) REL Report re JPL Study
Ray Lewis reported that the JPL process was one whereby s l udge is
converted into activated carbon and reintroduced into sewage stream
for clarification. Packet in Directors ' folders shows some of the
pict~res taken here at Plant 1 . Also are pictures taken at four
levels of clarification and process and are tables of results on
var i ous levels of process to us. Recent resul ts indicate that we
can perhaps meet our requirements at a substant i a l reduction of
anticipated costs. Original ly required $275 mi llion for expansion
at Pla~t 2 . If this process works as it appears~ wi l l reduce that
substantially but don 't know how much at this t i me . This project
has been funded by NASA. Said he would like to recommend to Boar d
that financial assistance be authorized to further improve p i lot
p lant that we have and we will be able to prepare an applicati on for
a d e monstrat i on grant for proof of this on a p l ant -size sca l e .
Referred to item 14 where Dr. Fletcher has asked staff to appear to
pres~nt our case as far as regul ati6ns are concerned and advance
tecb~olo~y that can be used and what can be offered as far as meet i ng
the0e requirements. Also contemplating the first part of Apri l an
institute to review th i s process wi th State people and Wash i ngton
people, etc. Hope to say we can meet requirements a t a reduced cost
·and much sooner than anticipated . Much l ower overall ope r ating
cost . Staff is requesting that the Boards allow $1 0,000 to secure
the help of the JPL personnel for addi t ional supplies and a l so to
utilize our lab personnel for a three to four week p r ogram here to
accumulate more data in order that a project report o r draft report
to s 11bmit for a demonstration grant could be made. NASA has come up
with a little more money to extend the i r p i lot work here and we wou l d
like to participate from a staff level . It was so moved and seconded.
Hyde ~tated he thought it was a · good idea but just wante d to know
what the f i nal product was and its use . Ray answered they have a
two step clarifier. He briefly exp l ained process and said there was
a 20 -25% ash problem to be disposed of. Was asked how they got r id
of ash and he answered by -disposal. Hyde then asked how much of a
grant we were expecting and Ray answered perhaps one ha l f mil l ion o r
more .
Motion carried.
-4-
·c 16iJ EIR for Improved Treatment at Plant 2
REL advised that project report referred t o was fo r $275 million to
take care of effluent discharge req u iremen ts _to the year 198 5 and
EIR was part of project report submitted. Commended Kris Lindstrom
for many l ong h o u rs work~ng with co~s ulta nt . Feel that fina l repor t
is a good report and has been prepare d in ac cordance with g uide lines
of SWRCB. Answers questions of short t e rm and long term effects.
Major con c ern was quality of effluent. Need t o proc eed with our
public hearing so final report can be submit.ted .
Clark then moved items b & c. Mot ion seconded and carried.
Chaput then st ated , regarding Santa Ana River Intercept or, have
been told that it is going to have 30 MGD capacity and EIR said
35 MGD. Why the difference? Ray explained that the 30 MGD is
the Upper Basin capacity. That is capacity at County boundary .
At intersection of La Palma and Grove Street wh ere Reach 3
ties into line will have 5 MGD additional capacity for growth
re quired by District 2 . 5 MGD goes in increments from County
boundary .
Chaput then said he did not see report that was prepared at the
same time as EIR . FAH replied that they were recommending that
District 2 have an adjourned meeting sometime next month and will
send re por ts to Directors then .
(39) DI ST. 7 Other Business
Sal tarelli stated that since District 7 voted against the resolution
concerning "Conflict of Interests" legislation, he would like to
move that the staff be directed to prepare a resolution to send to
the State Assembly and State Senate indicating that we oppose their
excluding themselve~ from this "Conflict of Interests" Act . Mo t io n.
was seconded .
Clark asked Nissan for his comments on this motion and Nissan said
he had no comment.
Saltarelli reiterated that what he was saying wa s that t hey should
amend this bill to include themse l ves within the parame t ers of this
l egislation . Thought all Directors should do resolution in their
own cities .
Called for the que stion . Voi~e vote . Motion carried .
(52) DIST . 2 Other business
Nevil stated we srould have an opinion from the legal counsel regarding
opinions on annexations with reference to supreme court decision that
affected LAFC . Would like to have report of the Counsel by the next
meeting as to how that would affect the Sanitation Districts. (???)
Ni sson said he will prepare an opinion.
Also , it was mov e d & seconded that District 2 be added i n support
of the resolution that Distr ic t 7 is proposing . Motion carried .
(61) DIST . 3 Other bus~ness
Moved & seconded to add Di s trict 3 to resolution to State Assembly &
State · Senate . Motion carried . Hyde stated he wanted it recorded that
he voted no on that motion.
It was then me ntione d that a fter the l as t Board meeting , fo und that
there were some people there that weren 't ab l e t o speak a t public
hearing in Dist . 3 because of the l e n gth of the meeting and they had
left by the time the item came up . Had -stated in notice that public
hearing was ·.to b e at 8 : 00 and suggested that i n the f ut ur e should
hold it at time stated to ma ke it mor e convenient fo r t hes e people .
Finne ll said if the re h a d b ee n a numb e~ o f people there , would have
moved it up, but was a goo d po int and would do so f r om now on .
• __.-<->
Perry then asked Finnell about ap point i ng Committ ee discussed in exec.
session & he said he would appoint next month .
-5-
.f:~XCF.RPTS FROM rrHF '·ifNU'TE~:. 1.JF THE P~GULAR
J OIN'.1.' MEETING OF THE , · '')S 01'' DJ ; .1~CTORS OF COUNTY
SANrl'JU.'JJlN DISTI\ICTS Vi l_. -2, j, 5, -.6; 7 and 11,
OF uRANu.8 GU ti 1 '. . ') c: \LJ..~\-ihNl.H.
A regular joint iueeting of the Boards of Di.rectors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange
County, Ca.liforn1a., was held at the hour of 7: 30 p .m.,
March 13 _., 19 7 4 , 10844 Ell.:_ s Avenue, Fountain
Valley, Califor:nia.
The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called
the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
The roll was called and-the Secretary reported a quorum
pres~nt for each District's Board.
* * * * * * * * *
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of.
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to
5:30 p.m., April 3, 1974. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:17_p.m.~ March 13, 1974 .
•
STATE OF CALIFORNIA~
SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE ..
I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the
Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange C6unty, California,
do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full,
true a.nd correct copy of_ minute entri.es on meeting of
said Boards of Directors on the 13th day of March·
19 74
. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereun~//, set my hand this
14th day of March, 197 ~.
S-107
Bocrds of Dirc:ctol's
tion Districts No3.
7, and 11
EXCERPTS FROM rrHE MINU11 ES OF rrIIE HEGULAR
JOIN'l1 MEE'l1ING OF THE BOAHDS OF' DifillC~rORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DIS'l'IUCTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11,
OF ORANGE COU~TY, CALIFGRNIA
A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of OrDnge
County, California, was held at the hour of 7~30 p.m.,
March 13 , 19 74 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain
Valley, Califo1:nia.
The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called
the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
The roll was called and-the Secretary reported a quorum
pres~nt for each District's Board.
* * * * * * * * *
DISTRICT 2
Adjournment
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of.
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to
5:30 p.m., April 3, 1974. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:17_p.m.~ March 13, 1974.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA~
SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE
I, J. WAYNE SYLVES'I1ER_, Secretary of each of the
Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange C6unty, California,
do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full,
true a.nd correct copy of minute entries on meeting of
said Boards of Directors on the 13th day of March·
19 74
14th
S-107
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have
day of March, 19 7 4.
'
this
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5 2 6 2 7 2 AND 11
DISTRICT NO. 1
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 2
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 3
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 5
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 6
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 7
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 11
Directors present:
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
March 13, 1974 -7:30 p.m.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
ROLL CALL
Jerry Patterson (Chairman), Robert
Battin, Kerm Rima, and Donald
Saltarelli
None
Robert Nevil (Chairman), Dale Chaput,
Ralph Clark, Robert Finnell, Leonard
MacKain, John Garthe, George Scott.,
Bob Perry, Robert Root, Joe Temple,
and Donald Winn
Mark Stephenson
Donald Fox (Chairman), Robert Battin,
Thomas Blackman, Jesse Davis, Roland
Edwards, John Garthe, Jack Green,
Joseph Hyde, Frank Marshott, Bob
Perry, Alice Frankiewich, Robert Root,
George Scott, Charles Stevens, Jr.,
and Edward Byrne
Mark Stephenson
Don Mcinnis (Chairman), Ralph Clark,
and Carl Kymla
None
Ellis Porter (Chairman), Robert
Battin, and John Store
None
Donald Saltarelli (Chairman pro tern)
John Burton, Ralph Clark, James
Jackman, Don Mcinnis, Jerry Patterson,
and Ellis Porter
None
Henry Duke (Chairman), David Baker,
and Norma Gibbs
3/13/74
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
Fred A. Harper, General Manager,
J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary,
Ray Lewis, William Clarke, Doug
Preble, Kris Lindstrom, and Rita Brown
Ce Arthur Nissen, General Counsel,
Carolyn Ewing, Tom Kowalski, Don
Smith, Conrad Hohener, Walt Howard, \_,/
Harvey Hunt, Donald Martinson, Ken
Hanna, Jerry Peck, Sam Peterson, and
Robert Webber
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7; and 11 of Orange County, California,
was held at 7:30 p.m. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and
invocation, the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum
present for each District's Board.
* * * * * * * * * *
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Appointment of
Chairman pro tern That Director Saltarelli be appointed·
Chairman pro tern, the office of
Chairman having been vacated by retiring Director Don Smith.
DISTRICTS
Excerpts re Board
appointments received
and filed
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Minute Excerpts from the
Cities of Brea and Orange be
received and ordered filed; and
that the following representatives be seated as members of the
Boards:
CITY ACTIVE ALTERNATE DIST. NO.
Brea Leonard MacKain Donald Fox 2
Orange Joe H. Temple
James A. Jackman
Jess F. Perez
"
2
7
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular
meeting held February 13, 1974, be approved as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular
meeting held February 13, 1974, be approved as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular
meeting held February 13, 1974, be approved as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular
meeting held February 13, 1974, be approved as mailed.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular
meeting held February 13, 1974, be approved as mailed.
-2-
3/13/74
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular
meeting held February 13, 1974, and the adjourned regular meeting
held February 26, 1974, be approved as mailed.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular
meeting held February 13, 1974, be approved as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the
Joint Chairman
Temple and Winn to attend
ALL DISTRICTS
Expressing appreciation
for the services of
retiring Directors
Joint.Chairman Finnell called a
meeting of the Executive Committee
for 5:30 p.m., Wednesday, March 29,
1974, and invited Directors MacKain,
and participate in the discussions.
Following the report of the Joint
Chairman, it was moved, seconded, and
carried by unanimous acclamation:
That the Boards of Directors adopt
the following Resolutions expressing their appreciation for the
services of retiring Directors:
Director Resolution No.
Edward Just 74-45
Don Smith 74-47
Henry Roberts, Jr. 74-49
E. Ray Quigley 74-50
Cor Vanderwaal 74-51
Certified copies of these resolutions are attached hereto
and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the
General Manager
Mr. Harper reported that the Senate
Subcommittee on Air and Water, chaired
by Senator Muskie, was scheduled to
meet in Hawaii next week for the
purpose of reviewing secondary treatment requirements in that.
State. At the same time, they will be considering amendments
to the Act which would allow the Administrator of the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) the flexibility of determining the
degree of treatment required of deep ocean discharges.
Commissioner Pa·rsons, the Districts' representative on the
Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority,
has advised that the Authority's Project Director will present
testimony at the hearing concerning their findings on the effect
of discharges along the Southern California coast.
The General Manager reported that the Project Report and
Environmental Impact Statement for Improved Treatment at Plant
No. 2 had been submitted to the State Water Resources Control
Board and the Environmental Protection Agency. The Regional
EPA Administrator's office has advised that because of the scope
of the work, EPA would also have to prepare an Environmental
Impact Report which will take from six months to a year.
-3-
3/13/74
Our staff is presently developing a staging of project phases
in order that we may proceed in an orderly manner with
facilities for improved treatment, yet not commit the Districts
to unnecessary expenditures, pending final determination of
discharge requirements by the regulatory agencies. Mr. Harper
also advised that the Regional Water Quality Control Board had
submitted tentative requirements for the Districts in connection
with issuance of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System permit required under the 1972 Act. Of primary concern
to our staff under the proposed regulations are the excessive
monitoring requirements. A hearing on the permit is scheduled
for May 3rd.
In response to a question from Directors regarding recent
sanitation employees' strikes in other areas of the State,
the General Manager advised the Boards that we currently have
a two-year wage and benefits agreement with the Employees'
Association. However, in the event the Districts would experience
a walkout or strike by operational employees, our facilities could
be operated by supervisory personnel for a reasonable period of
time and thereby avoid pollution of our beaches.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the
General Counsel
The General Counsel reported that
during the past month he had spent
considerable time on arranging for
the bonding company on Job No. P2-20,
Power Reliability
as the contractor
Project at Plant No. 2, to take over the job
had encountered financial difficulties.
Mr. Nissen reported that the developer for Green Valley Number
Two (Holstein Industries) had paid previously disputed connection
fees to District No. 3, therefore eliminating the need for a
lawsuit.
The Counsel attended a meeting of the Attorneys Committee of
the California Association of Sanitation Agencies to discuss
necessary changes in Districts' guidelines, and new guidelines,
required as a result of recent legislation.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file
written report of
Executive Committee
Following a brief report by Vice Joint
Chairman Porter, it was moved, seconded,
and duly carried:
That the written report of the
Executive Committee dated March 4, 1974, be received and ordered
filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive 2 file, and approve
report of Special Committee
on Feasibility of Electronic
Data Processing System
Director Stevens, Chairman of the
Special Committee on Feasibility of
Electronic Data Processing System,
reported that the consultant engaged
by the Boards to conduct an EDP
Feasibility study had completed their
report, a summary of which had been furnished each Director with
the February Executive Committee minutes. Mr. Stevens expressed
his appreciation to Committeemen Root and Mcinnis for their work
and advised Directors that the consultant's report had been
reviewed with the Executive Committee, and that the Executive
Committee concurs with the Special Committee that the recommendati~s
contained in the study be implemented. Director Stevens then
introduced Messrs. Jerry Peck and Ken Hanna of Peat, Marwick,
Mitchell & Co. who reviewed their report and recommendations for
the members of the Boards.
-4-
3/13/74
The Board then entered into a brief discussion of the report
and recommendations, after which it was moved, seconded, and
duly carried:
That the Report to the County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County on a Data Processing Feasibility Study and Implementation
Plan, dated February, 1974, submitted by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell &
Co., be received, ordered filed, and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That implementation of the recommendations
contained in said plan be authorized, as recommended by the
Special Committee on Feasibility of Electronic Data Processing
System and the Executive Committee; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be authorized to request
a consulting proposal to assist the staff in implementation of
the data processing plan.
ALL DISTRICTS
Adopting guidelines for the
implementation of the
Governmental Conflicts of
Interest Act
Mr. Nissen briefly reviewed his written
analysis of the Governmental Conflicts
of Interest Act as it applies to the
County Sanitation Districts and his
memorandum and recommendations of
March 11, 1974, which he had
previously mailed to Directors. The General Counsel recommended
that the Boards adopt the proposed guidelines forwarded with his
memorandum to avail themselves of the immunities of certain civil
penalties should any Director be sued under the Act. Mr. Nissen
pointed out that in addition to the members of the Boards of
Directors, the proposed guidelines applied to the General Manager,
Chief Engineer, Secretary of the Boards and Director of Finance
of the Joint Administrative Organization, and the County Auditor
acting as ex-officio auditor of the Districts. The Boards then
entered into a lengthy discussion concerning the Governmental
Conflicts of Interest Act, the disclosure provision of the Act
and the propriety of adopting guidelines. During the discussion,
the General Counsel answered numerous questions posed by the
Directors, after which the following actions were taken:
ALL DISTRICTS
Adding General Counsel
to list of officials
subject to guidelines
guidelines.
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3 2 & 11
Adopting guidelines for
implementation of
Governmental Conflicts
of Interest Act
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the General Counsel be added
to the list of officials designated
under Section 2 of the proposed
Following a motion and a second to
approve the General Counsel's recommenda-
tion to adopt the proposed guidelines,
as amended, a substitute motion was
then offered and seconded to adopt
Resolution No. 74-52, adopting guide-
lines for the implementation of the Governmental Conflicts
of Interest Act, as further amended by the addition of a
disclosure provision as follows:
"Each of the public officials named in
Section 2 above shall, during the month
of April in each year and within thirty
(30) days after ceasing to hold public
office, file verified statements con-
taining the information described in
Government Code Section 3700(b) with the
Clerk of the County of Orange. It is the
intent of this section to make the pro-
visj ons of Chapter 11 of Di vision 4. 5 of
Title 1 of the Government Code applicable
to public officials of this District."
-5-
3/13/74
Following a roll call vote, the General Counsel advised
that the resolution, as amended, had been adopted by the
Boards of Directors of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 11; and
had failed to pass in Districts Nos. 5, 6, and 7.
Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and
made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICTS 5, 6, & 7
Adopting guidelines
for implementation
of Governmental
Conflicts of Interest
Act
The Chair then called for a vote
on the original motion to adopt
conflicts of interest guidelines,
as recommended by the General
Counsel, excluding a disclosure
provision, whereupon it was moved,
seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors of Districts Nos. 5, 6, and
7 adopt Resolution No. 74-53, adopting guidelines for
the implementation of the Governmental Conflicts of
Interest Act. Certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
Director Burton stated that he had not had an opportunity
to review the Counsel's recommendation and, therefore,
abstained from voting.
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving amendments to
Districts' Uniform Guidelines
Implementing the California
Environmental Quality Act
of 1970
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Districts' Uniform Guidelines
Implementing the California Environ-
mental Quality Act of 1970, as amended,
be further amended to conform with
recent changes in State regulations,
as recommended by the General Counsel; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager and General Counsel
be authorized to file an approved copy of said amended guidelines
with the Secretary of the District.
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing participation
with JPL on reactivated
carbon wastewater treatment
process experimentation
The Chief Engineer reported that
preliminary results from the
experimental reactivated carbon
improved wastewater treatment process
being conducted at the Districts'
facilities by the Jet Propulsion
Laboratory (JPL) of Cal Tech appears very promising. The
research to date indicates that a substantial reduction in·
capital and operating costs may be realized by the Districts if
the process proves successful on a plant-scale basis. To this
point, the JPL work has been funded by NASA, and Mr. Lewis
recommended that the Boards consider authorizing financial
participation by the Districts to extend the pilot project
to enable preparation of an application for a demonstration
grant for a plant-scale experimental program. Following a brief
discussion, it was then moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That participation with Jet Propulsion Laboratory of Cal Tech
in their experimental pilot project for reactivated carbon
improved wastewater treatment process be authorized in an
amount not to exceed $10,000.
-6-
3/13/74
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Authorizing staff member's
appearance before Joint That the General M~nager be authorized
Senate and House Committee to designate one staff member to appear
in Washington 1 D.C. before the Joint Senate and House
Committee on Science and.Astronautics
in Washington, D.C., when scheduled, to present the local sewering
~ agencies' viewpoints on reactivated carbon improved wastewater
treatment process, as requested by Dr. Fletcher of NASA; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging,
and incidental expenses incurred in connection with ~aid
appearance is hereby authorized.
ALL DISTRICTS
Requesting change of
interpretation of the FWPCA
Amendments of 1972 re ad
valorem taxes and industrial
cost recovery
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 74-39, requesting
interpretation of the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendments
of 1972, and the rules and regulations
implementing said act, to allow any revenue producing system
(including ad valorem taxes) that accomplishes an equitable
distribution of costs among users as deemed to meet the require-
ments of the act, and allow industrial cost recovery from all
industries within the applicant's jurisdiction; and directing
copies of said resolution be forwarded to Orange County's
congressional delegation, members of the House and Senate Public
Works Committees, and the Environmental Protection Agency.
Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made
a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file Draft
Environmental Impact
Report for Improved Treatment
at Plant No. 2
Following a brief review of the
Environmental Impact Report for
Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 by
the Chief Engineer, it was moved,
seconded, and duly carried:
That the Draft Environmental Impact Report for Improved Treatment
at Plant No. 2, dated March, 1974, prepared by Richard Terry &
Associates/Environmental Science & Services, with the assistance
of the Districts' staff, be received and ordered filed; and
that the staff be directed to file a Notice of Completion and
Notice of Intent in accordance with the Local Guidelines
Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,
as amended; and that April 25, 1974, be established as the date
for which all comments must be received on said Environmental
Impact Report.
Following comments on capacity provided in the Districts' system
for the upper Santa Ana River Basin, it was reported that
District No. 2 was scheduled to have an adjourned meeting to
review the Santa Ana River Interceptor Project.
ALL DISTRICTS
Fixing public hearing
date for consideration
of Draft EIR for Improved
Treatment at Plant No. 2
Plant No. 2 on April 3,
to conduct said hearing
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That April 3, 1974, be fixed as the
date for an informal public hearing
on the Draft Environmental Impact
Report for Improved Treatment at
1974, and that the staff be authorized
at the Districts' administrative offices.
-7-
3/13/74
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving Change Order
No. 3 to plans and
specifications for
Job No. Pl-9-1
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 3 to the plans
and specifications for Additional
Secondary Treatment at Reclamation
Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-9-1,
authorizing an addition of $10,542.62 and granting an extension
of time of 137 calendar days to the contract with James E.
Hoagland & Hoagland Engineering, a Joint Venture, be approved.
Copy of this Change Order is attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving Change Order
No. 2 to plans and
specifications for
Job No. J-4-1
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 2 to the plans
and specifications for Increased Water
Reuse Facilities at Plant No. 2,
Job No. J-4-1, authorizing an addition
of $3,194.00 and granting an extension of time of 159 calendar
days to the contract with F. T. Ziebarth and Ziebarth & Alper,
a Joint Venture, be approved. Copy of this Change Order is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approving assignment of
funds re Job No. P2-20 That the Assignment dated March 5,
1974, from Mel Gorham Electric
Company, Contractor for Power Reliability Project at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-20, to Industrial Indemnity Company, bonding
company for said project, of remaining funds due contractor
on said job, be received, ordered filed, and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS
Accepting Job No.
Pl-9-1 as complete
Following removal from the consent
calendar at the request of the staff,'-""
it was moved, seconded, and duly
carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 74-40,
accepting Additional Secondary Treatment at Reclamation Plant
No. 1, Job No. Pl-9-1, as complete; authorizing execution of
a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement.
Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made
a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Convene in executive
session
ALL DISTRICTS
Reconvene in regular
session
ALL DISTRICTS
Amending Positions and
Salaries Resolution on
items considered in
executive cowJnittee
At 8:55 p.m., the Boards convened in
executive session to consider
personnel matters.
At 9:07 p.m., the Boards reconvened
in regular session.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 74-54, amending
Positions and Salaries Resolution
No. 71-3, as amended, approving
salary adjustment for the position of General Manager.
Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made
a part of these minutes.
-8-
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file staff
progress report on Treatment
Plant Construction Projects
and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Certification of the
General Manager received
and ordered filed
3/13/74
Moved, seconded,-and duly carried:
That the staff progress report dated
March 7, 1974, on Treatment Plant
Construction Projects be received
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the certification of the General
Manager that he has checked all bills
appearing on the agenda, found them
to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment,
be received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried by
roll call vote: Approval of Joint Operating
and Capital Outlay Revolving
Fund warrant books That the Districts' Joint Operating
and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund
warrant books be approved for signature of the Chairman of
District No. 1, and that the County Auditor be authorized and
directed to pay:
Joint Operating
Capital Outlay Revolving
$101,691.51
475,317.54
$577,009.05
in accordance with the warrants listed on pages "I-1" through
"I-4", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:10 p.m.,
March 13, 1974.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of warrants
That the District's Operating Fund
warrant book be approved for signature of the Chairman, and
that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay
$304.30, in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II",
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
9:10 p.m., March 13, 1974.
DISTRICT 6
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
9:10 p.m., March 13, 1974.
-9-
3/13/74
DISTRICT 7
Directing staff to
prepare plans and
specifications for
Contract No. 7-1-R
Contract No. 7-1-R.
DISTRICT 7
Ordering annexation of
territory to the District
(Annexation No. 35)
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff be authorized and
directed to prepare plans and
specifications for Repairs to
Gisler Trunk (Infiltration Reduction),
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Standard Resolution No. 74-41-7,
ordering annexation of approximately
15 acres to the District in the vicinity of Santiago Boulevard,
Ryals Lane and Avenida Palamar in the City of Orange (Proposed
Annexation No. 35 -Tract No. 8235 to County Sanitation
District No. 7). Certified copy of this resolution is attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of warrants
That the District's Operating Fund
warrant book be approved for signature of the Chairman,
and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay:
Operating Fund
Fixed Obligation Fund
$ 165.50
10,000.00
$10,165.50
in accordance with the warrants listed on page "III", attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICTS 2 3 3) & 7
Adopting resolution
concerning Governmental
Conflicts of Interest
Act for transmittal to
State Assembly and Senate
Following comments by the Chairman
of District No. 7 regarding exclusion
by the legislature of State Assemblymen
and Senators from the provisions of
the Governmental Conflicts of
Interest Act, it was moved, seconded,
and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors of Districts Nos. 2, 3, and 7 adopt
Resolution No. 74-55, in form prepared by the General Counsel,
objecting to the exclusion of State legislators from the pro-
visions of the Governmental Conflicts of Interest Act; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said resolution be forwarded to the
Presiding Officer of the State Senate and the Speaker of the
Assembly. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto
and made a part of these minutes.
Director Hyde requested that his vote in opposition to the
resolution be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 7
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. '-"'
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:12 p.m.,
March 13, 1974.
-10-
DISTRICT 11
Authorizing initiation
of proceedings
re Annexation No. 17
3/13/74
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Standard Resolution No. 74-42-11,
authorizing initiation of proceedings
to annex approximately 3.55 acres of territory to the District
in the vicinity of Warner Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway
Alternate (Annexation No. 17 -Balsa Chica State Beach
Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 11.) Certified
copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes.
DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of Suspense
Fund warrants That the Districts' Suspense Fund
warrant book be approved for signature
of the Chairman of District No. 3, and that the County Auditor
be authorized and directed to pay $304.30, in accordance with
the warrants listed on page "II", attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of warrants
That the District's Accumulated
Capital Outlay Fund warrant book be approved for signature
of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authdrized
and directed to pay $86,959.35, in accordance with the warrants
listed on page "III", attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICT 11
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:13 p.m.,
March 13, 1974.
DISTRICT 2
Approving Change Order
No. 12 to plans and
specifications for
Contract No. 2-14-1
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 12 to the plans
and specifications for Santa Ana
River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant
No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract
No. 2-14-1, authorizing an addition of $7,995.06 to the contract
with Sully-Miller Contracting Company, be approved. Copy of this
Change Order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2
Receive, file, and
reject claim for personal
injuries re Contract
No. 2-14-1
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the claim for Personal Injuries
submitted by Henry Stone and Jerry
Butler in the amount of $500,000,
in connection with construction of
the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to
Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, be received and ordered
filed, and that said claim be rejected on the basis that it is
an improperly prepared claim and is defective as to form in that
there is no entity entitled "Sanitation District of Orange County",
as recommended by the General Counsel.
-11-
3/13/74
DISTRICT 2
Accepting Grant of Easement
from Orange County Water
District re Contract
No. 2-14-2
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Standard Resolution No. 74-43-2,
authorizing acceptance of Grant of
Easement from Orange County Water
District for a permanent easement in connection with construction
of the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Katella Avenue to La Palma~
Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-2, at no cost to the District. Certified-
copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes.
DISTRICT 2
Authorizing initiation of
annexation proceedings
re Annexation No. 9
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Standard Resolution No. 74-46-2,
authorizing initiation of proceedings
to annex approximately 8.251 acres of territory to the District
in the vicinity of Prospect Avenue and Collins Avenue in the City
of Orange (Annexation No. 9 -Tract No. 8399 to County Sanitation
District No. 2). Certified copy of this resolution is attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2
Receive and file staff
progress report re
Contracts Nos. 2-14-1 and
2-14-2
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff progress report dated
March 7, 1974, on construction of the
Santa Ana River Interceptor from
Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella
Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, and the Santa Ana River Interceptor
from Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-2, be
received and ordered filed.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of warrants
That the District's Accumulated
Capital Outlay Fund warrant book be approved for signature of
the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and
directed to pay $396,020.03, in accordance with the warrants
listed on page "II", attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICT 2
Requesting legal opinion
re EIR's relative to
annexations
Chairman Nevil requested that the
General Counsel submit a legal
opinion at the next regular meeting
of the Board regarding the pos~ible
requirement of submitting Environmental ,
Impact Reports in connection with annexations to the District.
DISTRICT 2
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to
April 3, 1974, at 5:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 9:17 p.m., March 13, 1974.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Receive and file minute
excerpt and letter from That the minute excerpt from the ~
cities of Buena Park and City of Buena Park dated February 19,
Westminster re Contract 3-20 1974, and the letter from the City of
Westminster dated February 27, 1974,
approving alignment of the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5, 6,
7 and 8, Contract No. 3-20, be received and ordered filed.
-12-
DISTRICT 3
Approving Change Order
No. 3 to plans and
specifications for
Contract No. 3-17
3/13/74
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 3 to the plans
and specifications for the Knott
Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1
and Reaches 2 & 3, Contract No. 3-17,
authorizing an addition of $38,627.33 to the contract with J. ·F.
Shea Company, be approved. Copy of this Change Order is attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 3
Approving Change Order
No. 4 to plans and
specifications for
Contract No. 3-17
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 4 to the plans
and specifications for the Knott
Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1 and
Reaches 2 & 3, Contract No. 3-17,
authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities to the contract
with J. F. Shea Company, be approved. Copy of this
Change Order is attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICT 3
Approving Change Order
No. 5 to plans and
specifications for
Contract No. 3-17
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
·That Change Order No. 5 to the plans
and specifications for the Knott
Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1 and
Reaches 2 & 3, Contract No. 3-17,
granting an extension of time of 104 calendar days to the contract
with J. F. Shea Company, be approved. Copy of this Change Order
is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Accepting Contract
No. 3-17 as complete That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 74-44-3, accepting the
Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 & 3,
Contract No. 3-17, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice
of Completion upon receipt of letters of compliance from agencies
issuing permits in connection with said contract; and approving
Final Closeout Agreement. Certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 3
Receive, file, and
deny claim for personal
injuries re Contract
No. 3-18
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the claim for personal injuries
submitted by Kenneth C. Young dated
February 25, 1974, in the amount of
$100,000 in connection with construction
of the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18, be received,
ordered filed, and denied, as recommended by the General Counsel.
DISTRICT 3
Receive and file draft
Environmental Impact
Report
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft Environmental Impact
Report for Imperial Relief Interceptor
Sewer, Reaches 22 and 23, be received
and ordered filed; and that the action of the staff in filing
of Notice of Completion in accordance with the Local Guidelines
Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,
as amended, be ratified; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That March 20, 1974, be established as the date
for which all comments must be received on said Environmental
Impact Report.
-13-
3/13/74
DISTRICT 3
Receive and file
staff progress report
re Contract No. 3-18
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff progress report dated
March 7, 1974, on construction of the
Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract
No. 3-18, be received and ordered filed.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of warrants
That the District's Operating Fund
and Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund warrant books be approved
for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor
be authorized and directed to pay:
Operating Fund
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund
$ 445.00
1851019.20
$1851464.10
in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II", attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 3
Adjournment
seconded, and duly carried:
Following a brief discussion regarding
agenda procedures in connection with
public hearings, it was moved,
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:22 p.m., March 13, 1974.
-14-
WARRANT NO.
22339
22340
·?2341
~~342
c2343
22344
. 22345
. 22346
22347
' 22348
22349
22350
22351
22352
22353
22354
22355
22356
22357
22358
22359
22360
22361
22362
22363
22364
22365
22366
~367
~2368
22369
22370
22371
22372
22373
22374
22375
22376
22377
22378
22379
' 22380
22381
22382
• 22383
22384
22385
22386
22387
22388
22389
22390
?391
~392
22393
22394
22395
22396
22397
22398
22399
22400
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARilANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Abaco Packaging Corp., Containers
Advanced Electronics, Batteries
Air Conditioning Supply Co., Freight
Al's Tree Service, Trees Topped
All Bearing Service, Inc., Belts
Allied Supply Co., Valves
American Chain & Gear Co., Pum~ Parts
American Compressor Co., Compressor Parts
American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Technical Manuals
American Lock & Supply, Inc., Hardware
City of Anaheim, Power
Anchor Packing Co., Pump Packing
Apco Supply, Electric Supplies
Appliance Refinishing Co., Refinish Equipment
Arrow Glass & Mirror Co., Office Partitions
Barksdale Controls Division, Controls
Barnes Delaney, Engine Parts
Bearing Specialty Co., Pump Parts
Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair
Benner Sheet Metal, Inc., Fabricating
Blower Paper Co., Janitorial Supplies
Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams
Broadlick Art Supply, Drafting Supplies
C & R Reconditioning Co., Engine Repair
Cal-Glass for Research, Inc., Lab Supplies
California Auto Collision, Inc., Truck Repair
California Collator Sales, Binding Supplies
Certified Laboratories, Solvents
College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials
Commercial & C.B. Communications, Co~muni~ation Equipment
Consolidated Elect. Distr., Electric Supplies & Conduit
(MO 1-9-74)
Consolidated Reproductions, Printing
Constructors Supply Co., Tools & Hardware
Control Specialists, Inc., Regulator
Copeland Motors, Inc., Truck Parts
Costa Mesa County"Water District, Wat~r
Mr. Crane, Crane Rental
Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage
Curtin Matheson Scientific, Lab Supplies
D & C Concrete Pumping Service, Concrete Pumping
c. R. Davis Supply Co., Fire Hose
John M. Deck, Engine & Equipment Parts
Deckert Surgical Co., First Aid Supplies
Marvin E. Derfler Co., Pump Parts
Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling
Don's Schwinn Cyclery, Bicycles
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies & Printing
Elect Air Tool Co., Incinerator Parts
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Hesearch & Monitoring (MO 12-14-66)
Engineers Sales Service, Inc., Pump Parts
Ensign Products Company, Lubricant
Enterprise Printing Co., Printing Supplies
Envirotech Corp., Pump Parts
Envirotech -Sparling, Meter Repair
Fischer & Porter Co., Regulator & Chlorine Parts
Foss Company, Foam
City of Fountain Valley, Water Reimbursement Fee
William H. Fox, Employee Mileage
France Products, Compressor & Parts
Fredson, Equirnnent Parts
Preewoy Hacl1:.!_nc &:, Helding, Machining
Garden Grove Lumber & Cement Co., Building Materials
I-1
AMOUNT
33.71
50 . 40
18.96
1,995.00
82.40
489.30
119. 59
186.46
52.50
42.79
20.70
88.20
47.41
116.00
1,088.0Q
593.18
1,596.00
201.23
81.95
152.25
248.32
26.00
28.58
655.00
19.61
207.94
75.63
164.45
446.39
111.55
2,667.66
21.14
260.91
458.96
16.43
6.o·o
1,283.51
52.26
in.,94
45.00
905.68
40.19
56 .57
114.71
374.00
174.28
640.46
109. l·Q
l,8~YLOO
173.46
278.60
70.08
164.88
106.29
2,066.92
42.QO
693.31
27.30
713.55
19.99
335.6)
869.42
WARRANT NO.
22401
22402
22403
22404
22405
22406
22407
22408
22409
22410
22411
22412
22413
22414
22415
22416
22417
22418
22419
22420
22!~21
22422
22423
22424
22425
22426
22427
22428
22429
22430
22431
22432
22433
22434
22435
22436
22437
22438
22439
22440
22441
22442
22443
22444
22445
22446
22447
22448
22449
22450
22451
22452
22453
22454
22455
22456
22457
22458
22459
22460
22461
22462
22463
22Ll6ll
22465
IN FAVOR OF
General Electric Co., Electric Supplies
General Electric Supply Co., Electric Supplies
General Telephone Co.
Georgia Pacific, Building Materials
Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine {Contract 1-1-73)
Golden West Fertilizer Co., Grit Removal
Graybar Electric Co., Electric Supplies
Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Parts & Repair
Halsted & Hoggan, Inc., Pump Parts
Harbor Fire Protection, Fire Extinguisher Service
Hardware Systems Co., Lab Supplies
Hardy & Harper, Inc., Paving
Charles G. Hardy, Inc., Hardware
Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal
Hersey Products, Inc., Valves
Honeywell, Inc., Controls, Strip Charts & Meter Repair
Howard Supply Co., Pipe Supplies (MO 1-9:..74)
City of Huntington Beach, Water
Inland Nut & Bolt Co.,. Hardware
International Business Machines, Maintenance Agreement
Jensen Instrument Co., Controls
Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies & Fittings
King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, Belts & Boiler Parts
Kleen Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies
Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware.
Koppl Company, Piping
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tools & Hardware
L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Service
The Lacal Company, Inc., Cleaner
Lewco Electric Company, Pump Repair & Truck Parts
A. J. Lynch Company, Trawl Containers
R. W. McClellan & Sons~ Inc., Paving Materials
John McCullough, Employee Mileage
M B Industrial Supply, Hardware
Metropolitan Supply Co., Gauges
E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers
B. Jean Mosher, Employee Mileage
Nashua Corp., Reproduction Supplies
National Lumber & Supply, Inc., Building Materials
Nelson-Dunn, Inc., Engine Parts
City of Newport Beach, Water c. Arthur Nissen, General Counsel Retainer
Occidental College, Ecological Boat Charter
City of Orange, Water
Orange County Boiler & Industrial Repair, Freight
Orange County Chemical Co., Chemicals
Orange County Stamp Co., Office Supplies
Orange County Wholesale Electric, Switches
Pacific Telephone Co.
Ron Parker, Employee Mileage
Norman Parsons, Employee Mileage
Polaris Battery Co., Batteries
Porter Boiler Service, Inc., Boiler Parts
Postmaster, Postage
Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage
Quikspray, Inc., Pump
Radio Products Sales, Inc., Meter Supplies
Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal
Red Valve Company, Inc., Freight
The Register, Annual Subscription
Gordon E. Reid Drafting, Drafting Services
Republic Supply Co. of Calif., Hardware
Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Parts
SGA Scientific, Inc., Lab Suppliea
Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing & Drafting Supplies
I-2
AMOUNT
141.77
791.11
1, 2·J7. J5
822.53
4,496.73
2,208~
293.0~
202.J3
489.83•
29 .93·
186.07
285.0J 4
144.08
140.0::>
52.03
458.99
6,517.27
17.03
1,444.85
12.82
277.25
1,124.58
159. 41
281.53
97.72
511.43
371.57
1,722.10
47.39
71.10 146 'l
448~
110.16
7.88
289.28
2,018.69
21. 75
118.31
61.04
36.6C>
399.99
800.00
375.0J
29.19
16 .45;
75.29.
7.46
84. 53•
462.41
15.6C>
6.30
322.01
32.61
500.00
49.14
1, 197 •,..I
23.~
4J.OJ
14. 75
33.0::>
136.0J
38.12
113.93
82.7J
185.35
WARRANT NO.
22466
22467
22468
22469
~2470
~471
22472
22473
22474
-22475
22476
.. 22477
22478
22479
22480
22481
22482
22483
22484
22li85
22486
22Li87
22488
22489
22490
22491
22492
22493
22494
?2495
~496 ~2l197
22498
22499
22500
22501
22502
22503
22504
22505
22506
22507
22508
22509
' 22510
. 22511
22512
• 22513
IN FAVOR OF
Santa Ana· Electric Motors, Elect. Motor & Motor Rewind $
Santa Ana Electronics Co., Electronic Supplies
Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies
City of Seal Beach, Water
Security Industrial Supply Co., Flanges
Shaw Pump & Supply, Inc., Pump & Pump Parts
Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies
A. H. Shipkey, Inc., Truck Tires
John Sigler, Employee Mileage
Fred Sinasek, Employee Mileage
Smith Optical Service, Safety Glasses
So. Cal Sign Co., Sign
South Orange Supply, Pump Parts
Southern California Edison Company
Southern California Gas Company
Southern California Water Company
Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water
Speed-E Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Stanco Mfg. & Sales, Inc., Truck Repair
Standard Concrete Material, Inc., Concrete
Standard Oil Company, Gasoline & Oil
Stang Hydronics, Inc., Pump & Pump Parts
T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Rental
Bruce Taylor, Project Report Expenses & Employee Mileage
Taylor-Dunn, Equipment Parts
39 Stake & Building Supplies, Survey Supplies
Triangle Stee~ & Supply Co., Steel
J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Hardware
The Tustin News, Bid Notice -Truck Bodies
U. S. Equipment Co., Inc., Compressor Parts
Union Oil Co., Gasoline
United ·Auto Parts, Truck Parte
United Reprographics, Inc., Printing & Drafting Supplies
Utilities Supply Co., Tools
Vaniman Camera, Photo Processing
John R. Waples R.S., Odor Consultant
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc., Engine Parts & Gaskets
West Coast Industries, Building Materials
Western Corp., Electric Supplies
Western Salt Co., Salt
Western Wholesale Co., Equipment Parts
Wilson Ford Sales, Truck Parts
Russell Wold, Employee Mileage
Wood's GMC, Inc., Manual & Truck Repair
Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage
Xerox Corp., Office Supplies & Reproduction Service
Zodiac Paper Coo, Printing Supplies
Fred Ae Harper, Various Meeting & COD Expenses
AMOUNT
572.82
17. 59 .
170.48
8.80
3~7.67
373.55
1,094.31
72.16
35.70
37.38
32.71
41.48
1:)7.19
28,463.52
1,487.06
3.21
41.16
323.37
123.18
911.70
2,525.14
1,807.05
247.50
106.25
41.00
34.34
286.35
56.26
8.96
810.67
124.98
3 c::A 6".' _.l'-J • Lo,,_
1,230.76
93.72
69.96
. 218.10
260.38
84.52
309.60
96.20
211.49
13.67
40.14
357.19
31.50
1,215.20
101.71
160.35
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING $ 101,691.51
I-3
WARRANT NO.
22514
22515
22516
22517
22518
22519
22520
22521
22522
22523
22524
22525
22526
22527
22528
22529
22530
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
B & J Construction Co., Contractor PW-032 $
Bassett Office Furniture, Office Equipment
James G. Biddle Co., Test Equipment
John Carollo Engrs., Engineering -Plant Construction
Ducommun Metals & Supply Co., Tools
E.T.I. & Kordick, Contractor P2-ll-l & I-8-3
Ficker Architects, Architectural Services J-13
City of Fountain Valley, Plan Check Fee J-13
Grillias, Pirc, Rosier, Alves, Architectural Engr. Pl-16
Hemisphere Constructors, Contractor P2-21
James E. Hoagland Co. & H0agland Engr. Co., Contr. Pl-9-1
Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. & Monteleone & McCrory, J-10 Suit
Settlement (I.IO 12-12-73)
J. Ray Construction Co., Contractor J-13
Richard Terry & Associates, E.I.R. 73-74 Project Report
Twining Laboratories, Testing P2-21, I-8-3 & J-13
United Reprographics, Inc., Plans & Specs Pl-16
F. T. Ziebarth & Ziebarth & Alper, Contractor J-4-1
AMOUNT
3,089.50
328.44
390.11.
55, l~71.~
159 .b~J
101,968.0C)
2, 929. 50 ~
385 .OC> •
1,298.75.
54,105.31;,
18,Jl2.62
40' 0()0 . ()()
180,538.13
2,65Q.J.J
121.00
11,323.20
2,555.20
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING $ 475,317.54
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF $ 577,009.05
•
I-4
DISTRICT NO. 2
WARRANT NO.
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
22531
22532
22533
22534
2~5
22536
22537
22538
22539
22540
22541
2".-42
22543
?254L~
John Carollo En~ineers, Los Alisos Feasibility Study $ 1,031.23
18,951.2B
4,387.50
15,838.75
Clean Water Con~ultants, Phase II Anaheim Forebay
Kasler Corporation & L.H. Woods & Sons, Contractor 2-14-2
Lowry and Associates, Engineering Service 2-14-3, and
Construction Survey 2-14-1 and 2-14-2
Sully Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 2-14-1
Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Inspection 2-14-1
DISTRICT NO. 3
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
State of California, Annexation Processing Fee 3D & 3E
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
354,693.27
1,118.00
$ 396,020.03
$ 445.00
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Service 3-17 & 3-19,
Construction Survey 3-17 & 3-18, Design Survey 3-19 $
Jenkins Construction Company, Contractor 3-12-1
Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Inspection 3-18
21_,055.75
11,256.80
l_,482.00
151,209.90
14.75
A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Saliba Co., Contractor 3-18
Twining Laboratories, Concrete Testing 3-18
DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11
SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Service 3-17
J. F. Shea Co., Inc., Contractor 3-17
DISTRICT NO. 5
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
City of Newport Beach, Connection Fee Collection
II
$ 185,019.20
$ 185,464.20
$ 11,465.00
119,933.33
$ 131,398.33
304.30
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
225l~6
22547
22548
22549
22550
22551
22552
22553
22554
22555
22556
22557
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Service
State of California, Annexation 36 Processing Fee
State of California, Annexation 35 Processing Fee
FIXED OBLIGATION FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
City of Anaheim, Annual JOS Payment
City of Buena Park, Annual JOS Payment
City of Fullerton, Annual JOS Payment
Garden Grove Sanitary District, Annual JOS Payment
City of La Habra, Annual JOS Payment
City of Orange, Annual JOS Payment
City of Placentia, Annual JOS Payment
City of Santa Ana, Annual JOS Payment
DISTRICT NO. 11
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Kordick & Son, Inc., Contractor 11-12
III
$
AMOUNT
25.50
70.00
70.00
$ 165. "-"
1,561.80
96.70
1,561.80
241.80
386.90
1,474.70
241.80
4,434.50
$ 10,000.00
$ l0,165.50
$
~
86,959.35