Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1974-02-13
. ' MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Dis tricts of Orange County, California JOINT BOAR.OS REGULAR MEET ING Februar y 1 3,·1974 -7 :30 p .m. Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 The foll owing is a brief exp l anation of the more important non-routi ne items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise se lf-explanatory . Warrant lis ts are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but will appear in the supplemental agenda available at the meeting. Joint Boards No. 6 -Report of the General Manager . The staff and engineers will make a verbal progress report on the preparation 0 1f the Pr oject Report for Improved Treatment at Plant No . 2 to meet State and Federal requirements . This re - port, which was authorized by the State Water Resoµrces Contro l Board, must be submitt ed to them prior to March 1st to be eligible for design and construction grant fund~ for the current 1973 -74 fiscal year. The Project Report anticipates a long -term ·con - struction schedule of appro ximate l y 10 years and r eq1 lires many millions of dqllars . Nos. 8 and 9 -Rep ort and Recommendations of the Executive Committee. The Committee met on January 29th; a report of the del ibera- tions and recommendations is enclosed for all active Di rectors . No. 10 -Conse nt Calendar . (a) and (b) -Awarding Purchase of Rep lac ement Vehicle s. Public bids were received for budget ed replacement vehicles on February 7th. It is recommended that the Boards au t ho - rize purchase of these vehicles from the lowes t bidders . ----~-----....... . ...-,-, ---~-_....,.._ ·--·--·--· ~--.-,.,.....--·---·------.--------· • (c) Printing of Plans and Specifi c ations for 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Project at Plant No . 1. In January, the Boards approved t h e advertising for bids for this Activated Sludge Treatment Project upon receipt of State and Federal approval . We have been advised by the State that they are certifying the project and that Federal approval ·Will be forthcoming. Since this is a detailed project involving some 100 design sheets , we have solicited bids from several re- producing firms to prepare the plans and specifications for the bidders on this $25 million plus construction job. The action appearing on the agenda ratifies my action in authorizing United Reprographics, Inc., to reproduce the neces~ary plans and specifications. Any b i dder taking out plans will be charged $75 for same and any residua l costs to the Districts will be re - imbursab l e on a percentage basis through the project grant (approximately 83%). (d) Operation Transition Work Experience Program . For the past two years, the Boards have approved the use of the Treatment Plant sites for an Environmental Protection Agency -sponsored training program adminis - tered by Orange Coast College, to provide on -site work experience for people studying to enter the water pollution control field . The actual administration and classroom instruction are conducted by the college staff and the Districts merely make a\yailable our plant facil i- ties fo r on-the -job experience at no cost to the Districts . The program has been advantageous since the t~ainees spend 20 hours per week working productively with o ,:.r crews, and it has proven a valuable source of recruitmeDt to fill many of our personne l needs. It is recommended that the college 's request to extend the program another year be authorized. · (e ) Resolution No. 74 -19 . Pursuant to action taken by the Boards in December, the . r esolution appearing in the agenda declares the Boards ' int ent to appr ove an Amendment to the contract with the Public Employees ' Retirement System, providing for one- hal f continuance of retired survivors ' allowance effective J ul y, 1974 . -2- .~ -· ------ (f) AivISA Committee on User Charges and Industrial Cost Recovery. As a result of our Districts' participation in the Association of Metropolitan S~werage Agencies (AMSA) _St . Louis meeting on State and Federal requirements for user charges and industrial cost recovery , Wayne Sylvester has been asked to serve on a special com -· mi ttee to meet with EPA officials t o pers u ade them to promulgate more reasonable and workab l e rules to imp l ement user charges and industrial cost .re - covery . EPA personnel have indicated that they are desirous of assistance from this c omm ittee ; therefore, we request authorization for our Director of Finance to participate in the meetings. (g) Authorizing Attendance at Meetings in Washington, D.C. The Association of Metropo l itan Sewe r age Agencies (AMSA) and the Water Pollution Control Federation (WPCF) are holding concurrent meetings on legisla- tive matters in Washington , D.C ., on March 25 and 26 . I t is requested that I be authorized to attend. This will a l so provide an opportunity to hold f urther discussions with EPA officials and our legislative representatives concerning amendment of EPA 's def i ni - t i on of secondary t r eatment for ocean dischargers . Nos . 1 2 and 13 -·Report of the General Counsel . The General Counsel wi l l make recommendations to the Boards c01 ·~erning amendments to the Districts' uniform guidelines imple- mc~ting the California Environmental Act of .1970 and the effect o f new l egi s l ation regarding "confl ict of interest ". No. 14 -Report of Special Committee on Reclaimed Water Pr icing Policy . The Committee held discussions with the staff on January 1 6 and February 4. A written report from the Committee, including re comrriendat i ons to the Jo i nt Boards , is enclosed with the agenda ma ter i a l. . Nos . 15 and 16 -Awarding Contracts for Jobs Nos . PW -035 and PW-036. '-- The standard resolutions appearing on the agenda award contracts for Additional Boiler Facilities at Plant No . 2 and for Repair of Two Gas Spheres at P l a n t s Nos. 1 and 2. Bids wi ll -3- ' -.. --:-I r be taken on these two projects February 11th and recommendations for award will appear on the supplemental agenda on Wednesday. Nos. 17 through 19 -Resources Management Center Program. In October, the Boards authorized major modification and renovation of the former Operations offices at Plant No. 1 in the amount of $33,000 to provide a location for the Resources Manage- ment Center. The contractor has now completed his phase of t5e renovation which totals $30,800. It is the staff's request tliat the Phase I authorization be increased by $6,500 to provide for needed District force account work, furniture, drapes, and engin- eering inspection costs chargeable to the project. The actions appearing on the agenda increase the Phase I authorization, grant an extension of time, and authorize execution of a Notice of Completion. The staff is extremely pleased with the construction results. We now have a very functional work area for our Resources Management personnel. No. 20 -Engineering Design Proposal. Pursuant to the instructions of the Executive Committee, the staff has requested a proposal from John Carollo Engineers for ·design of two sludge gas engine-driven pump units for the existing Foster Booster Station. The proposal offers to provide the necessary engineering services for a lump sum fee of $49,100. The staff has reviewed the proposal and it compares favorably, from the Districts' standpoint, with the ASCE design fee curve. The staff recommends that the proposal be accepted. No. 21 -Financial Report for the First Half of the 1973-74 Fiscal Year. Enclosed with the agenda material is the report of the Director of Finance for the 6-month period ended December 31st. We are pleased to note that despite increasing costs of labor and materials, the Districts have provided treatment and disposal services to the community at substantially last year's cost per million gallons treated (12/72 $37.03/mg, 12/73 $37.17/mg). The staff will be prepared to answer any questions the Directors may have concerning the repo~t. No. 22 through 24 -Personnel Matters. The Boards will convene in executive session to discuss personnel matters. -4- No. 25 -Resolution N6. 74-24. The resolution appearing in the agenda declares the Districts' intent to adopt a revenue program and rules and regulations pertaining to industrial .waste discharges which will comply with the requirements placed on our Distr i cts by State and Federal agencies. The implementation schedu l es atta ched to the re solution are necessary to r eceive fu t ure ·con-\ struction grant commitments. District No . 11 No. 41 -Proposed Annexation of 3,55 Acres of Balsa Chica State Park. The District has received a request for annexation of a portio n of the Balsa Chica State Park . The action appearing on the agenda re fers the matter tq the staff for study and recommendat i on to the Board. District No . 7 No . 46 -Awarding Contrac t fo r Diversion Structur es .· Bids for this pr oject were taken on February 6th . Five bids were received, with the low bid being $25 ,978 (Engineer's estimate, $30 ,912). I t i s the staff's recommendation that the contract be awarded to Ha l opoff & Sons, Inc., the low bidder. No. 47 -Installation of House Laterals. During the design phase of the Diversion St ru ctures , a p~,Jperty owner requested that a bid item be included for the instal lation of several house l atera ls on one stretch of the project. The action appearing on the agenda authorizes the in- stallation of four house laterals upon receipt of $1 ,200 from the property owner , at ·no cost to the District. No. 48 ~ Approving Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement. In February, 1973, the Board declared its intent t o enter into a Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement with the Irvine Industrial Complex for the construction of the J am bore e Boulevard Subtrunk No . 2 sewer. The project is now complete and i t is the staff's re commendat i on that an agreement be approved to reimburse the Complex in the amount of $29,710 . No. 49 -Proposed An nexation No . 36 . The standard resolution appearing in the agenda orders annexation o f approximately one -half ac~e to the District in the vicinity of Cowan Heights Drive. The Board took action in Novembe r -5- declaring its intent to annex the procerty . All annexation fees have now been paid and the proceedings can be finalized . No . 50 -Proposed Annexation No . 38 . The standard resolution appearing in the agenda authorizes initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 11 acres (Tract No. 8149) to the District in the vicinity of Wendes Road between Santiago Creek and the Santiago Canyon Road . This property is within the City of Orange and pursuant to actions taken by the Boards of Districts Nos . 2 and 7 , this area will be detached from District No . 2 and annexed to District No . 7 . No . 51 -Progress Report on Proposed Annexation No. 39 - Irvine Industrial Annexation . Pursuant to the January 23rd instructions of the Board , the staff and District 's engineers have been investigating the feasibility of annexing approximately 446 acres northerly of the Marine Corps Air facility to the District . With the information gathered thus far, it appears that this property could be served by District No. 7 facilities wi thout jeopardi zing the capacity rights of. properties within the Di stric t. A written report and re commendation will be submitted by the staff at Wednesday 's meet i ng . No. 52 -Proposed Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer. The engineer 's prelimin ary report on construction of the proposed Tu stin-Orange Trunk Sewer is enclosed with the agenda material. This i s the last major construction in the District's Master Plan of sewers. It ls recommended that the report be received , and that the staf 1> be directed to request comments from the various entities t~rough which the facilities will be constructed . The projectea construction cost for the Tustin- Orange Trunk Sewer totals $2,662 ,000 . The engineers are recom- mending that the work be scheduled to meet operational dates of 1 975 and 1 976 . v District No . 2 No . 56 -Environmental Impact Assessments for Contracts Nos. 2 -15, 2 -16 , 2 -17 , and ~-1 . The District 's engineers have subm i tted Environmental Impact Reports on the proposed construction of the Yorba 'Linda Pumping Station and Force Ma in, the Kramer Boulevard Interceptor Sewer, the Pa l m Drive Interceptor Sewer , and the Carbon Canyon Interceptor Sewer . It is recommended that the reports be re - ceived, and that March 20 , 1 974 be established as the cut -off date for comments on the subject Environmental Impact -6- ,.. .. ,.. Reports. Copies of the repo r t have b een mailed t o t h e District Direct o rs whose entiti e s will be af fecte d by the c ons t ruc t ion , and to the Chairman o f the Distric t. I n a ddit i o n , copies o f the reports will be sent to the staffs o f the affected entities f or their comments . No . 57 -Santa Fe Railway Company Crossing Agreement . The reso l ution appearing on the agenda a pproves and authorizes execution of an agreeme nt with the r ailroad for a crossing in the vicinity of Riverda le and Orang e -Olive Road) for the construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No. 2 -14 -2 . The cost will not excee d $15 0 . No . 58 -Update Report on Progress of Santa Ana River I ntercepto r, Reach No. 3 . The staff will report on the progress made to date on the project repor~ for the final reach of the Sa nta Ana River Interceptor within the County. We will be reporting to the Board on the capacities to be provided the Dist rict and the costs that we anticipate . The Santa Ana Wate r shed Pro j ect Authority will submit the required Project Report to the State by March 1 . No . 59 -Grant of Easement from Southe rn California Edison Company . The action appearing on the agenda is a standard resolu- t i on authorizing acceptanc~ of a permanent eas e ment from th e Ed i son Company in connection with the construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor , Contract No . 2-14 -2 , at no cost to the District . Nos. 60 and 6 1 -Purchase of Rights of Way and Temporary Working Areas . The actions appearing on the agenda authorize the purchase of permanent rights of way and temporary working areas in con- ne ct i on wit h t he construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor , Co n tract No. 2 -14-1 . These settlements have be e n negotiated by the General Co u nsel and it is recommended that they be approved . No . 62 -Proposed Annexation of Approximately 7 Acres to the District . The District has received a request for annexa tion of a small area to t he District in the vic i nity of Prospect and Co llins . I t is recommended that the letter be received and referred to the s t aff for stu dy and recommendation to the Board . -7- District No. 3 Nos . 67 and 68 -Pro·posed Annexation No . 3E (Inhabited). The Board will consider annexation of approximately 50 acres to the District in the v icinity of the U. S. Naval Ammu - nition Depot. The proposed annexation area is inhabited , there - fo r e a public hearing is required . All property owners have been advised by l etter concerning the hearing on the proposed annexation, and as of this writing, we have received only two phone calls and no written protests . The Directors will recal l that the required annexation fees have previously been paid by the original developer of the property. No. 70 -Proposal of Boyle Engineering fo r Engineering Services for the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 , 6 , 7, and 8. In accordance wit h the instructions of the Board , t he staff has requested the proposal of Boyle Eng i neering Corporation for engineering services to prepare plans and spec i fications for the Knott Interceptor Sewer . The construction cost for the four reaches of the sewer, escalated to reflect the estimated costs at the time of construction, is approximately $10,000,000. It i s the staff 's recommendation that the proposal of Boyle Engineer - ing Corporation be accepted for engineer ing services in the amount of $250 ,945 . No . 71 -Land Acquisition Re l ative to Construct i on of the Knott Interceptor , Contract No . 3-17 . The resolution appear ing on the agenda accepts a Grant Deed for property purchased in fee relative to the Y ~ott Inter- ceptor Sewer Construction . S6me time ago, the Boar~ authorized purchase of this property for $30,000, as recommended by the General Counsel . No. 72 -Claim of Allstate Insurance Company. The Allstate Insurance Company has filed a claim in the amount of $1 39 .1 0 for damages in connection with construction of the Knott Interceptor Sewer , Contract No . 3-17 . The General Counse l recommends that the claim be denied . No. 7 3 0 -Acceptance of Contract No. 3 -1 2-1. The contract for Additions to the Seal Beach Boulevard Pum ping Station, Contract No . 3 -1 2 -1, is now complete. It is recomm ended that the Board authorize execution of a Notice of Completion. Fred A. Ha rper General Manager -8- . . '.I i I I I, II 'I l.1 II BO ARD S O F D !~.~C T 0:1 S County Sa nitation Dis!ricts of Or ~~ge County, Cel:forr.i a ME ET ING DATE ~E BRUARY 13, 1974 -7:3 0 P.M. (1) Pledge of All egia ~ce a~d Invo c atio n ( 2) Rol l Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if ne ce ssary Post Office Bex 8127 10344 E!!i s A v er.;.;e Fc un~a:n Vc H0:1 , C::!:f., o:;:::• T;?:eph c..:-.. Areo Code 71 4 54 0-29 : 0 962-24 l i AGENDA ADJ OURNMENTS POSTED . ..:.:---' CO MP & MlLEAG E ..... ic.:::::: FI LES SET UP ........ ~: ..... .. RESOLUTI ON S GERTI Fl ED .!<"' LETIERS \'/R ITIEN ..... ~ MIN UTES WRITI EN ..... <:-:::::.:" MINUTES HLED ........ ~- FILED .~---DISTRICT 3 LETTER _______ ....... ( 3 a ) A/C _ •• TKLR ... . Consideration o f notion to rece i ve and file minute e xcerpt fro~ the d ity of La Palma appointing Jake J . ~estra a s su bstitute altern~te to ~ttend February 13, 1974 meet i ng (4) EACH DISTR I CT @ Considerati on of motion s approv ing mi nu tes of the followin g meetings , as mailed : II\\ s. Di strict 1 January 9 , 197 Ll regular A\\~ District 2 Ja··u ary 9 , 1974 r egular /, \ ~ District 3 January 9 , 1974 regular 1\\ )s. District 5 January 9, 1974 regular }l\\'S District 6 January 9, 1974 regular MlS Di strict 7 JP. ·1uary 9, 1 974 r egul a r J'::.r. ua r y 23, 197 4 adjourned M \.s District 11 January 9 , 19 74 r egu::i.a r ALL DISTRICTS Report of t he Joint Cha irman fllf ........ § r ::: ' .J ~-L· : :-.:: .. ~-=: ::-.3 lETIER ............. ._ " ) A/C .... TKLR ,,., Report; ofthe Gen eral Manager . -=:=~@ ALL DISTRICT S 'Report of the General Counsel .. CE) M)S ( 9) ALL D 2:~::=. r .::~s . Report of t'.lc Exe c 1.:tive Comr::itt e e a:.d. cor:s ider c.ti c :, o f motior. to r e ceive 2.r.d fil e Comm ittee 's Hritt en r er:•c r t ALL DIST RICTS Cons"i:d.2ra-tion of acti on on item.:; rec orrJ:'le nded b y Exec u tive Cc ~~i ttee : the ~-~(a/ LETTER .Rt V.' Consideration of mo tion to accept proposal o f Enchant er , Inc., dated J anuary 24, 1974, for oceanographi c services, and authorizing General Manager to engage said firm at the new rates effective M~rch l, 1974 A/C _TKLR •••. (b) F I LE ···········~ lmER ~.t.. ....... . A/C _TKLR ... . @--~(.c) lffiE ~.l;'.:2-~ A/C __ TKLR M•• i #n//' Consideration of motion amending authorization of October 10, 1973 for engineering services of John Carollo Engineers i~ connection with preparati on of Project Report for Improved Treatment Fac ilitie9 at Plant No . 2, and authorizing an increase of the maximum engineering fees from $65 ,00 0 to $85 ,000 Consideration of motion autho ri zing the Genera l Manager to engage Richard J. Shaffer, Consultant , to conduct a study and make rec omme ndatio ns on purchasir:g and warehousing policies and procedures , fo r a maximum fee not to exceed $2 ,200 .00, as requested by the staff (10) ALL DISTRICTS CONSEN.T CALE NDA R All matters placed upon .the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanaticn and unless any part icular item is requested to be removed frcm the consent calendar by a Director , staff member, or member of the public0 in a tte'ndance , there will be n o separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motion$, and casting a unanimo us ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed fr om the consent calendar shall be considered separately in the regular order of bus.ines s . Members of the pub lic ~ho wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall , upon recognition by the chair , state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot on the consent calendar not specifically remov ed from same . N\\~ FI LE ···-··-········· LETTE R ···-··-···- FI LE -·····-····· .. LmER ···-·-· .. . A/C _TKLR ... . ~.o. V:: .. Consideration of motion t o recei ve and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding purchase of One (1) 4-Wheel Drive "Jeep Universal 11 , Specification No. A-070 , to Brian Chuchua's 4-Wh eel Drive Center, in the amount o f $4,301 .21 See page "A" ~ Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation n and re commendation, and awarding purchase of Two (2 ) \M~,~ 3/4-Ton Cab & Chassis Trucks, Specification No . A-07 1, )YJI' · to To mmy Ay re s Chevrolet , in the amount of $5 , 7 04 . 92 See page "B" (CO NSENT CALENDAR continued on page 3) -2- (10) fllf IETTER ............. : A/C -•• TKLR ... . p17 / __ _ FILE .••••..•.......... lmE Rf}..~---l A/C _TI<LR .... ( c) (d) (e) ( COI ;SE NT CAL:C:.J ;D AR c o n t inued from oa12;:e 2) Co n sid e r a tio n o f motio n ratlfying ac t i o n of t he Gene r a l Manager in awarding printing of plans and specificat ions for 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No . Pl-16, to United Reprographics, Inc. in the amount of .$10,784.00 plus tax Consideration of motion authorizing one-year extensio~ for Operation Transition Work Experience Program conducted in cooperation with Orange Coast College and the Environmental Protection .Agency. See page "C" FILE ···-----;/ <~-~·-· Consideration of Resolution No. 74-19, declaring intent to approve an amendment to the contract between the Board of Administration of the Public Employees Retirement System and District No. 1, providing for one-half continuance of post retirement survivors' allowance effective Jul y 1, 1974. See page rir:)11 Nc-ffiR .... FILE -·---•..•• LETTER -·······. - A/C _TKLR ·-· FI LE ··-· • LETTER --· ..... A/C -TKlR ...• (f) (g) Consideration of motion auttorizing Director of Finance to attend and participate in meetings in connection with h is membership on the Assoc iatio n of Metro p olitan Sewerage Agenc ies' (AMSA) committee on user charges and industria l cost r ecover y ; and authorizing .reinbursenent for travel, lodging , meals and incidental expenses inc urred in connection with attendance at said meetings Consideration of motion authorizing General Manager to attend concurrent meetings of the Water Pollution . Control Federation--Legislative Sem inar, and the Association uf Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (A MSA). in Washington, D.C. on March 25th and 26th; and autho rizing reimbursement for travel, lodging, meals and incidental expenses incurred in c onnect ion wi th attendance at said meetlng ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items .deleted from consent calendar, if any ALL DISTRICTS Report of General Counsel re amendments to Districts' Uniform Guidelines I mplement ing the California Envir onmenta l Act of1 1970 :.~--~ ALL DISTRICTS A/C __ TI<tR __ Report of General ·Counsel legislation : re "Conflict of Inter est " ----···-·c14) ALL DISTRICTS Report of Specia l Cammi ttee on Reclaimed Water Pricing Polic::: FI LE !> •.• ~-(a) LETTER f._~l\ M \ s A/C _ .. TKLR .... Consideration of motion to receive and file written report of Reclaimed Water Pricing Policy Committee, dated February 6, 1974. (Mailed with agenda material) ~ Consideration of action on Special Committee's ~ recorrunenda tions (1 5 ) ALL DI STR I CTS / (15) Consider~ti o n o ~ Standard Resolut i on No. 74 -20, t o FiLEn __ il. ... :...... receive ;nd fil~ bid tabulation and rec ommendation and ~_TKL~1t···~~\~ a warding c o ntract f or Additiona l Boiler Facilities at ~. 1,1 ~ Pl ant No. 2j Job No. PW-035, t o Po r ter Boi l er Service ,· I nc ., i n the amount of $37 , 57 3. 00 . See page "IV" .a.-~-.. ~-···· -3-J J..LL DISTF.IC 'I S C on~~ of ~Landard Resol ut ion No . 74 -~i, ~o rec u i v~ and file bi d ta~~ .d recc~ffie~dation , a~d a ward i ns c ont r act for Re pa ir o f T•·:o Ga s .... ::--'.,.::::-'"'"' A t Plants :tfc.s . 1 & 2, Job No . PW-036 (Bid Dat e February 11, 1 9 7 -~ . leme ntal ageu.da) § v ·· (1 6a) Consideration of Resolution No .. 74 -36, dir ecting the wo r k be completed by Districts' force account for Repair pf Tw o Gas Spheres at Plants Nos. 1 and 2 , ETIER ............. . A/C --:~_[\ \ ~ FILE .\'.'.'!. .... )~ (1 7 ) tmER .... ··-····· A/C _nlR .... \!;; __ [f\ (18) HU: ·--··-··-- 1.Frn!R ···-··--- A/C _mR ~ \S (19) FI LE ....... """"'"( (-4 ;:;;..... !' J l~ER ····-·-1f) ~ A/C -.TKLR -· Ue0i.- (21) (22) (23) Job No . PW-036. See page "V ". ALL DISTRICTS Considerat ion of mot ion amending autho rization o f October 10,. 1973 approving impleme ntation of Ph ase I of Resources Management Prog ram, and autho rizi ng an increase in maximum amount fro m $33 ,000 to $39 ,5 00 ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 1 to the plans and specifications for Resources Ma nag ement Center at Reclamation Pl ant No . 1, Job No. PW-032, g ranting an 1 extension of time of 1 8 ca l endar day s to the contra c t wi th B & J Co nstruc t i on Corr.pany . S ee page "E" ALL DISTRICT S Consideration of Standard Res o lution No. 74-22, accepting Resources Management Center at Reclamat ion Piant No . 1, Job No. PW-0 32, as complet e and authorizing execution of a No tice of Complet i o n AL L DI STR ICTS Consideration of mo tion accepti n g proposal of John Caro llo Engineers, dated F ebr uary, 1974 for design of two sludg e gas engine-dr.i ven pump units in the. existing Foster Boos ter · Station, for a lump ~um fee of $49 , 1 00 .. See page "F" ALL DISTRICTS Consideration o f motion to receive and file financial report of Di r ector .o f Finance f o r six-month period e nding December 31, 1 9 73 (Mailed with agenda material) ALL DISTRI CTS Consideration of moti 0 1~ to convene in executive session re personnel ma t ters ~:17 ALL DIS TRICTS Considerati on of mo tion to reconvene in .regular session 9:d ~ (24) ALL DISTRICTS Action o n items considered in executive session: ::e~--~~~ (a) Considerati on of Resolution No. 7 4-23, amending Positions A/C _mR -mb ~~~r ~~~~~!~ ~i~~~~;~: ~~~l ~~~~~l (~~p~.3 i ~~-;~~:~; ~0~:; r Wednesday meeting fold e rs) ~_;::::::___ ' ( b ) tmER- A/C _:00.R -~r'IJ;2 ---·--· II f ........... _.,.,. Consideration of motion to receive and file General · Counsel's o pini on·, dated Jan uary 22, 1974, re legality of paying ove rt ime to District perso nnel in lieu of time off; and consideration of mot ion authorizing payment o f 96 hours ($602 .2 5) accumulated compensatory time to Russell D. Wo l d , Districts' Construction Inspector, because of severe fina ncial hardship resulting from extensi ve f am ily medical expenses. See page "G" &,... ~~;:y~~ ·~ Considerati on of action on other personnel ma tters ~ ~ discussed in executive session -4- (25) ALL D :!:S-:=-~rcr:::-s l.E -··-·---£ ~~A {j Considerati on of 2eso l ut !o n Ko . 74-2 4 , decJR~i n~ intPnt tn ad op t r evenue prograrr. re financi~s of Di stricts ' activicies and ind~stri al waste d!s c harge , and r ules and r egula~io~~ wh ich will comply wi th r equ irement s placed upon the District s by applicable State and Federal re gulat i ons , and adopting A/C _TKL Rf lt (26) (27) (28) implem~ntati o n scheau.ies therefor. See page "H" ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of mot io n to receive and file staff progre~s report on Treatment Plant Const ruction Projects. See Page "I" ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file certification of the General Manager that he has checked al l bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in o r d er, and that he recommends authorization for payment ALL DI ST RI CTS (28) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operat i ng and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant RDLLCALCVOTEu\ .. -u·-books for signature of the Cha i rman of District No . 1, _ !~0 a nd authorizing payment of c l a i ms listed on page "I" flLE D-L.@ A~L DISTRICTS LETTER _____ (2 9) Co n sid era t ion . of motion to rece i ve and file Stop Notice we __ nc:LR -· submi tted by The Foxboro Company against Mel Gorham n.~t~ Electric Company, Contractor for Power Reliability Project /·I~ a t Pl ant No . 2 , Job No . P2 -20 , in the amount of $7 ,800.19 (30) DISTRICTS l & 7 Oon3idcratien_ of F?.otion approving S '.xsp~ns.-fund warrants, if an;y. See ~uppleme11ta:l e:gen:dB: a:ttachr!'ien t ( 31) DIST£FGT , Co11~iderB:tion of aotion approving warra.nt~, if any See 1 supplemental agenda attaohra.ent (32) DIS ICT 1 Othe business anCi~mnunications or~plemental agenda 1 terns'" if any (33) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adj ourn q ·3 J (34) DI8'PRIGT8 5 & 6 Gon3ideration of aotion approving suspense fund warranti , if any . 8ee ouppleaental B:genda attachment DI ST!'I CT 5 (35) 0\ \ s Cons i deration of motion approving wa r rants . See pag e "II " DIS ICT 5 (36) Othe business and'communicat i ons~ supplemental agenda . i terns , if any ""'--~ (37) DISTRICT 5 · t dJ 01 .· _;J I Consideration of mot ion o a ourn J (38) DI8'±1RIG'P 6 Oonaideration of r.wtion approving warrB:nt::!, if any . Bee ( 3 9 ). . . ouppleaental agenda attacfim:ent_ DIS'gRICT 6 Oth~r business and ~unications i tems , if any -5- eme ntal ~en da (40) DISTEIC7 6 t.Em:R -······. AJC _TKLR .. 'l';J Considera tion of motion i:o adj )Ur ~1 q :3; n:rS'fRIC'.l l l Consideration o f motion to receive and file let t er from State Depart~ent of Parks and Rec r eation , dated Jar.uar y 28 , 1974, requ esting annexation of 3 .55 acres of Bols a Chica State Beach, and refer to staff for st u dy o.nd rec oDJil er:C:.at:l.on . See page "J" DISTRICTS 3 & 11 (42) Consideration of motion a pp roving s uspense fund warrant s. ,M..\S. See page "II" ~---- DISTRICT 11 (43) M ~s (44) (45) Consideration of motion approving warrant s. See page "III" DISTRI T 11 Other ar:d c o~n icatiori.s ~upp l er.i e nt al age nd a items, if any D.ISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn q., 33 . (46) FILE ·--·-··-··-· DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Standard Resoluti~n No . 74 -25 -7, to receive and file bid tabulation and recomme ndation, and awarding contract for Diversion Structures, Contract ~o. 7 -3A -l, 7 -3A -2 , 7 -3B -l, 7 -3E-l, to Halopoff & Sons , Inc ., in the ~~--s: ~ . A/C _m.R -··l'r1 Is fllE ·····~··(..~ LETTER _.L. .... ~(48) iE§ '/ A/C _.TlCl.R - ~~IS FI LE -··-··-CEJ) ~-~· A/C __ TKLR -·· \ ----ft\ s (50) FILE ······-··-··- Cimi:R -~-~~.S:r A/C _TKLR .... -··-····· !V\ \ .s amount of $25,978.40 ·See page · 11 K" DISTRICT 7 Conaideratiori of ~otion authorizing installation of four house laterals in connectiori Kith construction of Di v ersion Structures , Contract No . 7-3A-l, 7 -3A-2, 7 -3B -l, 7 -3E -l, as requested by Robert W. Ross, upon receipt of $1 ,2 00 .0 0 from Mr. Ross for payment of said l aterals DISTRICT 7 Cons ideration of Resc:~tion No. 74-26-7, appro~ing Master Plan Reimbursement AgreemeHt with Irvine Industrial Complex for construction of Jamboree Boulevard Subtrunk No . 2, Reach 54, Contract No . 7 -2D-7. See page "L" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Standard Resolution No . 74 -27 -7 , ordering annexation of approximately 1/2 acre to the District in the vicinity of 10221 Cowan Rights Drive (Proposed Annexation No. 36 -Fowler Annexation to County Sanitation District No . 7) DISTRICT 7 . Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 74-28-7, authorizing 'initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 11 .134 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Wendes Road between Santiago Creek and a line northerly of Santiago Canyon Road (Proposed Annexation No . 38 -Tract No . 8149 to County Sanitation District No . 7) Fite ·-··-"q, DISTRICT 7 LETTER~~ Progress report on re quest of Irvine Industrial Complex for annexation of approximate l y 446 acres of territory to the District (Proposed Annexation No . 39 -Irvine Industrial Annexation) -6- -. ; (52) _ ....... r~ .......... , ..... ·~· DIS'i'P.I CT 7 Consirl.2ration of motion to receive and file En g ineer 's prelimina r y repo rt on con stru c ti 0 n of T ~s t i n -OraG ~e T r~nl : Sewer , Reac hes 10 throu g h 1 8 , a nd d irec ting sta ff -to request ('.omments fr '):': the respecti·;c: .:ities i r: ;,;r.ic h the facilitie s will be constructed on the proposed alignment and report back to the Board (Rep o rts mailed with agenda material) DISTRICT 7 ( c;-' .... j) m\~ (54) (55) (56) FILED~~ ~-l ~ A/C .••• TIClR FA ~~--i.--- ( 57) ~.PL ...... . @)-~---··ff\\S A/C _.TI<lR .... FI LE ·--···~" .. Consideration of motion approving warrants . See page 1:-;-7T!! business and coffiznunicatior.s or~upplem~tal agenda items, if any I \ DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn 1-;..t . d.. & -!/. 3'"fl> 9:'4/ DISTRICT 2 Consideratic n o f motion to receive and file Dr a ft E n vir o n~e~tal Impact Reports; directing the filing_of Notice of Com p letio_n. in accordance with the Local Guidelines I mplementing the California En v iro nne n tal Qu2.lit y Act o f 19 70 , as amend ed; anc establishing March 20, 1974, a s the date for which all cc!P.rnents must be -received on subject Environmental Impact Reports for the following projects: (a) Yorba Linda Pump Station and Force Main , Contract No. 2-15 (b) Kraemer Boulevard Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-16 (c) Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-17 (d) Carbon Canyon Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-18 · DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolution No . 74-29-2~ approving and authorizing execution of agreement with The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway C0mpany for crossing under the Atchison , Topeka and Santa Fe right of way in the vicinity of Riverdale and Orange -Ol ive Road, in connection with construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor From Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-2, and authorizing payment of $150 fee. See page "M" DISTRICT 2 --·--·-···· .·Verbal progress report on Reach 3 of the Santa Ana River ·Interceptor (59) DISTRICT 2 ....--Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 74-30-2, authorizing ~·~··A~/~ a:cceptance of Grant of Ease:ne nt frorr: Sou thern Calif o :::-':--.5.~ ~ -~~,.·:~·-/l\lS --~~~:~~u~~~~~n~f f~~e c. S~~~~2 ~~~t R~~:;i.:~~~e;~e~~~~e~~~~n K~~~i1a ..i ~..6V'-_ --~ Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No . 2-14-2, at no cost to -----~ the .District -7- ( . ' (6S) I:I ~':"?Ic ·:-2 f'IU . ../ l iftTER ···-!fl 'd AJC _.TKLR •••• "\\Oh.I II. .. u~:-::....:Pa ...J,pe ~ - (61) t ll.E ____ ;::::._ 3 > ~('~~ Qu ·@ (62) fllf (63) f l lf ···--·-··- LETTER _,....... l' A/C •.•. TKLR •• {It ')- ___ .. __ Con .sici era cicr. ot.' ?.-:;~olc.ticn 1~o . 74 -31 -2 , a u t~orizint; ;::._~_,.._e.,..."_'":~r._~:::-t1 .l"' ,":....-;-:,v-t-O f' ~L:::ic::,...~.c...,+-f.,...,r'.r-'\ ;.-r-~V"\c.-"..-, I c-~,-i i: yr -··hct--~ ·"--" ....,._ ----..... '-"--·-"' -_...,c ... ._ ... ..; ................ -.......... \..1 ... u-···"""' ~"""'""' ...,c..;.,.,..l..(a....v "'c"" a V'1""'""1 ..... V'""F-Y"t i-'""'n,_,l_ ... ~ l"'"''Y'l Yl "-, .. r_,,....L..;.,,. t -. L. -~i · r ·o -• .-. .... j::eL ... ._:.. ____ c_, ... c. .. v 0 1 1-'-0 ~E-i.,J _e-J..c.t,_,e 0 C 0 .1S1.,I1..<.Cvl n of the Sa :-t2. t-.na Rive r .:r.t E:r c eoto r Fron Pl::..n t Lo . 1 to y;_..__,,_ ''·""nu -'"'"' ·' ··o .. -_,, l· and "'u ···,ri·z i·nr::r .:. • .::::.. · .. -:; - -Cl . ., I '-' ...,.. ' ._, U .&. J. w ... .....,,. v tw1 l.'l • '--J... '"': -' c;.. V ! J v 0 exec~tion o f a Tem pc rary ~orkin g Li cense Ag reene nt i n connection Kit h said c o ntract , fo r a total amount of $18,212.00 , as rec o~..m ended by the General Counse l. See page 11 N'' DISTRICT 2 Conside~ation of Resolution No . 74 -32 -2 , authorizing acceptance of Grant of Easement from George and Lisa Saito , for a permanent grant of property relative to construction of the Santa Aria River Interc ep tor From Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No . 2 -14-1; and authorizing execution of a Temporary Working License Ag reement in connection with said con.tract, for a total .amo u nt of $3,589 .00 . as recommended by the General Counsel. See page 11 0 11 DISTRICT 2 Con side!'ati on c=: r:otion t o receive ar:d :'ile letter :'r0:::i. . Jennings -Ha lderman -Hood , da ted Janu ary 31, 1974 , on behalf o f . Gr ove Park Const ruction, Inc. req u esting annexation of 7,251 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of -Prospect a~d Collins, and ~efer to staf f t o r study and recommendation. See page "P" DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to receive a nd file staff progress report on c onst r uct ion of .the Santa Ana River I n terce ptor From Reclama t i on Plant No . 1 to Katella Avenue , Cont r act No. 2-14 -1, and the S~nta Ana River Interceptor From Katella Avenue to La ·Palma Avenue, Contra·c t No . 2-14 -2. See II Q II page DISTRICT 2 (64) rt\ t~ Consideration o f motion app r ov ing warrants . See page "II" ~ DISTRICT 2 ~ Other business and cm~unications or supplemental agenda items, if any (66) FI LE --® LETTER - A/C -TKlR •••• DISTRICT 2 Consideration of mot ion to adj our.n /i> ; 0 f DISTRICT 3 Public hearing re Proposed Annexation No. 3E -Bolsa Chica Road Annexati o n (Inhabited) to County Sanitation District No . 3 (a) Open hearing (b) Summary of Local Agency Formation Commission 's and District No. 3 's actions re proposed annexation (c) Wr it ten protests and withdrawals of same if any (d) Oral protests, if any ' (e) Determination of s u fficiency of protests, if any (f) Close hearing (68) DISTRICT 3 "'LE Consideration of Resolution No. 7 4-33-3, orderi ng annexation ~-···-;·~-V-:-\r ' of approximately 53 . 6 a~res to the Disttict in the vic i nity ~K ··t----~~' .a of the U.S. Naval Amrnuni tion Depot at Bolsa Chica Road and Ale -TJ<l.R ···· . Westminster Avenue (Proposed Annexation No . 3E -Bolsa Chica Road Annexation (Inhabited) to County Sanitation District No. 3) -8- I I I ' I I ! I l I J I • ~3 . ~~~ ~ ~. t:1 i .~~.~ ~ ~.~ ~~~-:i ~ ~~b~ -.!),~ ~~~~ 1'7 '7 </ a..o ~~.J (69 ) • fill' ;.E1Tiat ---- A/C _ '00.l -I\~ l:), ~~.,..~-~t~.l ~~s lll) . L-' DI ST EI C':::' 3 Consid eratio n of mor.1 nn to re (:e i '''=' ~nn file \0 i:-i:-e r !'r0!:1 t he City of Cy press , dated February 1, 1974 , a nd minute excerp t frorr. City of Stanton , d ate d January 30 , 1 974 , approving alignment of the Knott Int erceptor , Reaches 5 , 6 , 7 and 8 , Contract No . 3-20 . ~ DISTRICT 3 ~ Consideration of mot ion accepting proposal of Bo yl e Enginee ri ng Corp oration , dated February 6 , i974, for e ng i neering serv ices in connecti on with preparation of plans a nd specifica t i o ns for the Knott Interceptor, Re aches . 5 , 6 , 7 and 8 , Contract No . 3-20 , for a fee of $274 ,660 . less credit for preliminary engineering fees of $23,715 . for a net total fee not to exceed $250 ,945. See page "R" (71) DISTRICT 3 onsideration of Resolution · No . 74-3 4-3, authorizing , / acceptanc e of Gran t Deed fr om Dorothy T . Peck Flynn, et al ., \\n ~~-·-for a permaner.t grant of p !"o perty relative to c o nst ru c tion 1'1v ~R_,.>------M. f the Knott Interceptor , a Pert ion of Reach 1 and Reac h es 2 we _na.R -and 3 , Contract No. 3-17 , for a total amount of $ 30 , 0 00 ., as ~ v--" recomrr.ended by the General Counse l. See page "S " ----- DIST RI CT 3 Consideration of mot i on to rece ive , file and deny c laim of Al lst ate , dated J anuary 31, 1974 , in the amount of $1 39 .10 , in co nnection with construc t ion of th e Knott Interceptor , a Porti on of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 and 3 , Contra ct No . 3-1 7 , as recommended by the General Counsel . DISTRICT 3 (72a) I· LE -----·------ LETTER ·--··--··- A/C _Tl(LR ·-rf1 \ ') (74 ) FI LE ' ........... ~ ... .. LETTER ·-·-----.. ··~1 l t; A/C _TKLR •••• (75) (75) r~1.l~ e (77) Consid e ration of motion approving Change Order No . 1 , t o the plans and specifi cations for Additions to Seal . Be ach Boulevard Pump Station , Contract No . 3-12 -1 , author i zing an extension of 38 ca l endar days to the contract witt Jenkins Construction Company . See page "VI" DI STRICT 3 Consideration of Standard Reso luti on No . 74 -35 -3 , acc ept ing Additions to Seal Beach Boul evard Pump Station, Cor.tract No . 3-12-1, as complete and authori zing execution of a Not i ce of Comple tion . · DISTRI CT 3 Consideration o f motion to receive and file staf f progress reports on cons truc tion of the Knott Intercep~or , a Port i on of Reach 1 a nd Reaches 2 and 3 , Contract No . J-17 ; and the Knott Interceptor , Reach 4, Contract No . -J -18 . See pages "T" and nu 11 DISTRICT 3 Co n sider ation of motion approving warrants. See page ."II " DISTRICT 3 Ot he r business and communi ca ti o n s , i f a ny DISTRICT 3 Conside ration of mot ion to adjourn \D~~o -9- t • . ~ RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS February 13, 1974 -7:30 p.m . 9· BID T A B U L A T I 0 N SHEET Date February 7, 1974 Contract For: ONE (1) 4-WEEEL DRIVE "JEEP UNIVERSAL" SPECIFICATIO:i NO.· A-070 CONTRACTOR 1. Brian Chuchua's 4-Wheel Drive Center Placentia TOTAL BID $4,301.21 Specifications for the above were mailed to .7 firms. It is recommended that award be made to Brian Chuchua's 4-Wheel Drive Center, Placentia, in the amount of $4,301.21. /Jv/12~ ·W. N. Clarke Maintenance Superintendent AGENDA ITEM #lO(a) -A-ALL bISTr:.IrTs B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N SHEET Date February 7, 1974 Contract For: 1. 2. TWO (2) 3/4-TON CAB & CHASSIS TRUCKS SPECIFICATION NO. A-071 CONTRACTOR Tommy Ayres Chevrolet Laguna Beach McCoy Ford Anaheim TOTAL BID $5,704.92 6,995.40 Specifications fo~ the above were mailed to 12 firms: It is recommended that award be made to Tommy Ayres Chevrolet, Laguna Beach, in the amount of $5,704.92, as the lowest bid. 1))118!~4 W. N. Clarke Maintenance Superintendent AGENDA I'rEM #lO(b) -B-./\LL DISTf:IC'T.') •. •. Mr. Fred ~arper Ora~ge Coc.nty Sa~~tation District 108~~~ Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA. 92708 . Dear Mr. Harper: 2701 l"AIR\/IEW ROAD COSTA MESA CALIFORNIA 92626 January 22, 1974 It appears that the Orange Coast.college progran for the training of entry-level wastewater treat."Tlent plant operators will conti~l.ue along the lines we have pursued for the pa:st two years. It is earne?tly requested that the previous arrangements for on-site training in your faciiities be continued under the same agreements we made in fi;,e past. The instructions our students received from your personnel and the use of your pi.ant personnel made a iliajor contribution to the success of triis progran. · The basic act o.f attempting to meet an employer's needs at the plant in acdition to the chal- lenge of practical e~periences, is invaluable in an occupational- ly oriented progr~"Tl. Thank· you for your personal cooperation in this effort. In the event that you find it agreeable to continue· the on-site training opportuni t:. es. for our· students, I am enclosing a copy of a letter regarair .. ~ Work'Tian 's Compensation coverage for students placed on work exp~rience. SRP:gg •·· .. -·· -~ AG Er.JDJ\ ITEM 1110 ( d ) . -2~~- Samuel R. Peterson, Associate Dean Director of Federal Projects SERVING THE COMMUNITY SINCE 19'7 -C- RESOLUTION NO. 74-19 DECLARifJG HPI1F.i-IT TO APPEOVE AMENDMENT TO COf-/n:~1\Crl1 hirrl1 PUBLIC EHPLl)YEES' RE'11 I~~~~· '.E i,,: C .;3 Y ~·~ 'f~.f A RESOLUTION OF THE BOAHDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6., 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DECLAEING INTENT TO APPROVE AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT BETWEEN BOARD OF . ADMnnsrrF::'\TI.ON OF PUBLIC EMFLCYEES' H.ETIREf·IBN'l.1 SYSTEM AND COUNTY SPJHTATION DISTRICT NO. 1 * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Public Employees' Retirement Law permits the participation of public agencies and their employees in the Public Employees' Retirement System by the execution of a contract, and ' sets forth the procedure by. which said public agencies may elect to subject themselves and their employees to amendments to said law; and, WHEREAS, one of the steps in the procedure to amend this contract is the adopti~n by the legislative body of the public agency .of a resolution giving notice of its intention to approve an amendment to said contract, which resolution shall contain· a summary of the changes propo~ed in said contract; and, WHEREAS, the following is a summary of the proposed change: "Provides, upon the death of a miscellaneous member who has retired for service or disability, for the continuation of a post-retirement survivor allowance to certain survivors." NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: Section 1. That the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, hereby give notice of their intention to approve an amendment to the. I contract between County Sanitation District·No. 1 and the Board of Administration of the Public Emplcyees' Retirement System, a copy of said amendment being e.ttached hereto marked Exhibit "A" and by this reference me.de a part hereof; and, Section 2. That the Cha.1rrr:an a.nd Secretary of District. No. 1 are h~reby authorized and directed to exec·ute said amendrr.ent. :PASSED AND ADOPi1ED at a regular rnectint; held February 13, 1974. 80 f-.t .. JDJ\ crrr-:M. 111 0 ( e) -D-ALL DI.'31'F'.IC'1'S ._.'-"~•"• • , ... , •• , 11\I I\'•' 1'1"'''"''•1,J \•& \1;._;\.t\.11. \.~\.JUt•I I p • u • J: u .\ : ; l : ./ -l. !) ') l · l I. 1 l i :_; . \ v (' ll 1 l <.: F 0 u u l ; l .i ·n \'' L 11 c }' ' cl l j r 0 n l i :1 -~I 2 7 0 ~; c. 0. :.:o. l DATE ----------~7 <' hru ;1 c: ~, _ _j_~'--__.·'--1~ ~ . r ~ · C' • · ~ T ·r "r r r n · : r n' · ..... ' \ Y ~-~~------------ ·on: R.LSOtJrlTS :!.\::.\l~l:''.:·:>:T Cf:\TI:R ..\T I~FCL\~.1:\TI()~; PL:\\T ~o. 1, .Jon KO. Ph'-03~ Ar..ount of this Ch:in~c Order U.X.Xl) C·~:t~~t':t.Mir) $ 0.00 In :i cc c r-d ;1 n cc \,;it h cc n ~ r :1 c t prov i ~ ion!;·, th c f o 11 oh' in r, ch :1 n g cs in. t ~! c on l!mf""a c t ~: :1,: I o r co n t :· ~ c t '; o r k a r c · h c r c i) y ~ u t: 10 r i : c J :1 n <l :i s con pc n s a t .i on here for, t;1c followin~; ad<li tions to or deductions from the contract price arc: .crcbr appr~ve<l. . .. Extension of Contr~ct Ti~c Due to delays· in deliverv of the specified Materials, the contract time is hereby extended TOTAL TIME EXTENSION Sumrnarv of.Contract Time Original ·Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Conpletion ~ate Days Extended this Change Order Total Extension of Contract Time Revised Contract Time Revised ~ompletion Date Origin~l .· Contr3ct 18 Calendar Davs 18 Calendar Days November 29, 1973 45 Calendar Days J:a·nuary 13,. 1974 · 18 Calendar Days 18._ Calendar Days 63 Calendar Days January 31, 1974 •. Price $ 30,SGS.011 Prcv. Auth. CJnngcs I $ o.oo This Change C~N) c1cc:r:tw:n:~ $ 0.00 Ancn~lcd Co11 tract Price s 30,895.00 .. .· ·. . .· ----------------------------------------------- Hoar<l .:rnthorizaUon lbte: fcbru:lry 13, 197-l ly --- AG Erm.L\ rrn::M I! 18 -E- Approved: cou:\TY S/\?:IT.\TIQ?J }}J~)Tl~Ic:~·:-: -(" l~ ' Oranr,c Coun::y, California Hy_· -~----------~<""! ........ -. ·---.--· ... -..--· ·---· . L ii u: I ; ; : . . 1 : it ... · r· :i Pl-IOE~IX P..RIZ.CNA WA !... 'J 1 _1 T C ;:=? ::-: E': t< ( -A. LI ;;: 0 ~ ~-.. ; A ::.~LIFOR~··' A .JOMN A. CAROLLO, PE il906-19711 H. HARVEY HUNT, P.E. HOWARD M. WAY, PE. ROBERT G. WILLIAMS, PE. \4.'A.L.NU"; CREEK PLAlA, SUITE 7~0 1990 NORTH· CALIFORNIA BLVD WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94596 AREA CODE: •41~1 932-1710 DONALD R. PREISLER. P.E. GAIL.. P. LYNCH. P.E. Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6; 7, and 11 of Orange Co'llll:ty 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley~ California· 92708 Attention.: Mr. Fred A. Harper, General M~ager February 5, 1974 Subject: fee Proposal -Design of Outfall Booster Pumps and Engines Gentlemen: · \. I In accordance \vith 1t1r. Harper's request, we are pleased to submit our proposal for :furnishing engineering se·rvices for the preparation of plans and spe..:ifications for installation of the new outfall booster pum.ps and engines in the Foster Ocean Outfall B-ooster Pump Station. The estimated construction ~· cost of this work is $800, 000.. The extent of the work for which Plans and Specifications will .be pre- pared. is as follows: 1. Two new booster pumps with 70 to 90 MGD capacity (exact size depending on engine capacity availabl~). 2. Two digester gas -natural gas engines with right angle drives. 3. Cooling syst_e:n for the two engines .. 4. Piping and structural modifications to th.e structure and build- ing as necessary for installation of.the two engines and pumps. So Natural gas and digester supply piping. 6. ·Plant water, city water, and hot water piping. 7. Electrical system to allow pump operation during power outage. 8. Acoustical control on engines. F-1 , Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 2 February 5, 1974 9. Investigate hydraulics at Foster Pu.."TI.p Station (field test work to be performed by County Sanitation.Districts of Orange County staff). 10. Perform structural analysis at existing pump station. We will perform the following enginee.ring ~ervices for the project: 1. Hold detailed conferences with Districts' staff to review and discuss the project. 2. Prepare preliminary engineering studies and design for review and approval. 3. Prepare final design contract drawing, in pencil, on mylar. 4. Prepare contract special provisions, list proposals, and other docu- ments to be included \.vi th the Districts 1 standard general provisions .and specifications. · ~-Deliver the original plans and reproducible plates of the specifica- tions for reproduction by the Districts· • . 6. Prepare a final cost esti.Inate. 7. Assist the Districts in securing bids, tabulation and analysis of bid results and furnish recommendations on· award. 8. Review shop drawings as may be submitted by the contractors for compliance with design concept. · 9~ Perform final inspection and submit final rep.ort on ~he completed project •. 10. Prepare as-built drawings of the completed works and file the ori- ginal dra'\vings vii.th the Districts: Modifications to the original trac- ings will be based upon information supplied to the Engineer by the resident engineer and resident staff employed by Districts to furnish construction inspection. We propose to provide the· services in Items I through 10 for the lump sum of 549, 100; this lump su.'TI recognizes that t..1-ie prelirn.inary engin- eering for this pl'.'oject has already been accomplished by our firm, in co- operation ·with your staff, ciuri::g preparation o:f "the Project Report for ?lant No. 2. #?O F·-2 Bo~r·ds of Directors Cour.:ty sa~..it.::1.r::.on D:~s'!::.'."'":C'tS of O:ra.~ge Cc·.:..-i.ty Page 3 ~""ebruary 5, 1974 ·. We suggest that payment be monthly on a percentage completion basis up to 90 percent at time-of delivery oi plans and specifications, VJith an additional 5 percent due upon receipt of bids and with 100 percent pay- ment when i::he work is complete and accepted by the Districts. In the event the Districts require additional assistance in preparat:i.on of reports., supplements, documents, attending meetings, etc., in obtaining State and Federal Grants on the proj-ect we would be pleased to furnish ·any services they request on an hourly basis in accordance \vith the attached fee schedule. This ""°uld be in addition to the lump sum fee and accomplished only after and under direction of the Districts 1 ·staff. If we are authorized to proceed :with this work at the February 13th board meeting, we can _have plans and specifications completed by July 31, 1974. . We tha..nk you for the opportunity of presenting this proposal. Very truly yours, HHH:sm Enclosure AGEiJDJ\ ITEM #20 F-3 ALL Dt::--;1'RH"L~ •, JOH~ CA~OLLO E~GIXEERS FEE SCHEDULE Title -Rate Per Hour Partner $33.65 ·Head Engineer 31.85 Pr~ject Engineer 26.50 -~ Senior Engineer 23.90 Engineer 22.80 Associate Engineer 21.00 Assistant Engineer 19·. 40 Junior Engineer 17.65 Senior Draftsman 14.65 Draftsman 13.80 Junior Draftsman 12.50 .• Clerical 10.65 Typist 8.65 F-4 CLARK MILLC:l'I C. ARTHUR NISSON NCL.SCN KOGLER M. LAWSON MEAO TO: FROM: RE: MILLER. NISSON t!3 KOGLER ATTOR N E:YS AT LAW . 2014 NOR;"H SROADW~Y SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706 January 22, 1974 Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts· Nos . 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 and 11 c. Arthur Nis~on, General Counsel Question of paying overtime in cash in lieu of time off for non-supervisory and management personnel TELEPHONE: AREA CODE 714 • !S4&::•6771 At the regular meeting January 9·, 1974, a questio~ arose as to whether or not the Directors could authorize pay- ing a non-supervisory employee in cash rather than compensatory time off. The question specifically rai~ed was whether or not such authorization would be in fact a gift of public funds. Section 16 of Resolution No~ 71-64 is applicable in the situation and it specificaily provides that payment for overtime will be made at .the sa~e rate at which the employee was employed during the month the overtime service was performed but shall not exceed 24 hcurs per month for any employee unless specifically authorized b1 ·the Boards of Directors. If the Boards of Directors authorize the payment in cash rather than time off, it is a perfectly valid action. and there would be no gift of public funds :L·n _that the resolution provided this possi- bility at the discretion of the Boards of ·Directors. CAN :ac AGENDA ITEM #24(b) ' Respectfully submitted, /'2' /~ ) < '--tea__ 1.:.-~~ . C. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel -G-ALL DISTRICT.S A JO.II/? RS.-·-I.l.7TICIJ er ~:E EOAE0S OF DIHECTORS OF coc~~y .s.~~H'IA~ICN I" :~2TRICTS i!OS. 1, ·2' 3, 5, 6, 7, L:: .:l. O~ C)~ ·,~z cor:~l:''i, CALI~C:?i!Ill., DECLhF.L~G ::·:Ti'.:!,T'l1 ':10 l--· .. ·P~' EEVELL;E PROGRAM RE F:l:.t~rc:::G 07 DI.Sr:'~~IC~ ... :' AC:1:!:VIT:IES AUD. nmu:.::~RIAL h;'S':'Z I)ISCL'._F·:E RULS.:3 A~"JD REGULATIONS WHICH COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS PLACED UPON THE .DISTRICTS BY APPLICABLE. STATE AND FEDERAL ~GULATIONS, AND ADOPTING IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES THEP~FOR * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, pursuant.to the .Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 and the California Clean Water Bond Law of 1970, The Federal Envircnmental Protection Agency ana the State Water Resources Control Board have adopted regulations in connection with grants ·for construction of treatment works which require the recipients of constructiori grants to adopt a system of charges to assure t·hat each recipient of waste treatment services will .pay its proportionate share of the 9ost of operation and maintenance (including replacement) of any waste treatment services, and provide . for the payment by industrial users of the treatment works of that portion of the ·cost of construction of such treatment works which is allocable to the treatment of such industrial waste to the extent attributable to the Federal share of the cost of construction; and further, that grant recipients adopt a program 6f source control of pollutants; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the Districts' application for construction grant funding for work outlined in Project Report No. 1 for 1972-73 Joint Works Improvereents and Additions,.the State Water Resources Control Board has requested that these Districts submit a resolution declaring their intent to adopt a revenue program and a program of source control of pollutants which will comply with the aforementioned laws an~ regulations adopted pursuant thereto; and, AGENDA ITEM #25 H-1 ALL DI2.TRICT3 WH.EREAS, i.t i~ now and has been the policy of the Bonrds of Directors of these Districts to comply with all valid laws, tloth State . ~nd Federal, with respect to the treatment and disposal of waste water generated within the Districts; and, WHEREAS, this policy has been successfully carried out in· the past, resulting in maximum benefit to the users of the Pacific Ocean adjacent to Orange Ccunty as .well as to the taxpayers of the Districts. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: Section 1.-That the Boards of Directors of these Districts hereby declare their intent to adopt a revenue program which will demons.trate the Districts'· ability to finance their activities and distribute the ~osts of said activities.i~ accordance with afo~e mentioned laws and regulations adopted pursuant thereto; and furth~r, to adopt a program of source control of pollutants regulating sewer construction and use, and establishing industrial waste discharge rules and regulations which will comply with requirements placed upon the Districts by applicable State and Federal regulations·; and, . Section 2. That it is the intent of these Districts to implement~ the programs hereinabove set forth in accordance with the implementation schedules as set forth in Exhibit "A" and E~hibit "B" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That this declaration is subject to assurance of· Federal and State fir.ancial assistance for construction of facilities necessary .to comply with the Federal anti Stat~ discharge req~irements. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular.meeting held February 13, 1974. ALL f'T~TRICTS EXHIBIT "A II to Resolution No. ;4-24 CCU~:TY S.'0;ITA7IC:\ DISTRICTS OF OR.A.~:CE COUNTY ·January, 1974 February April June September-& October November December January, 1975 March April May June July through October November .January, 1976 through June July AGENDA ITEM #25 Complete drart cf conceptual program Adopt implementation schedule Review with state and federal agencies Complete final conceptual program Review with community leaders Complete first draft of revenue.program Review with state and federal agencies Review with community leaders Final draft of revenue program Review with state and federal agencies Review with community leaders · Set public hearings on proposed revenue program Hold pub!'ic. hearings on proposed revc.nue program Adopt revenue·program Review with local agencies and business community Implement revenue program H-3 .. 1974 January February/April July EXEIBIT "B" to he~olution No. 74-24 COUNTY S:~.NITATION DISTRICTS OF Oit~~GE COUNTY SOURCE cotnROL PROG~·1 D:PLE,1E~TATI0:'~ SCHEDULE Complete draft of proposed ordinance Review with the State and Federal Agencies Complete final conceptual progTam September and October Review with community leaders December · 1975 Janua~y March. April/June July/September November 1976 January/Jlllle July Review with State and Federal Agencies Review with community leaders Final" draft of ordinance presented to Districts' Board of Directors Board to establish public hearings on ordinance Public hearings on ordinanc~ Finalize ordinance for adoption by Districts' Joint Boards of Directors · Adopt ordinance H-4 Review with local agencies, businesses and industrial community and detail e.xp'lanation of adopted ordinance Effective date of ordinance PROGRESS REPORT TREATMENT PL~~! PROJECTS P2-11-1 -HEAD\':ORKS "C" EXPANSION AT PL\~T NO. 2 -($1,261,693) NEW MAIN SEWAGE PUMPS: Operational. NEW BAR SCREE~S: Operational. NEW GRIT C~\1BERS: Operational. NEW GRIT WASHER: Operational. NEW METER VAULT: Operational. FOUL AIR SCRUBBER: Operational. CouNTY SANITATION D:sTR!CTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 I 0844 ELLIS AVEMJE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CAUF:~RN!A ?~7C3 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962'."2411 REHABILITATION OF.HEADWORKS "B": Deteriorated concrete has been removed and ._.., .. surface is being prepared to receive gunite. Contract approximately 96 percent c·omplete to date. I-8-3 -INFLUENT METERING AND DIVERSION STRUCTURE -($1,485,679) ·INFLUENT CHANNEL: Completed. . ' INFLUENT PIPING: Euclid and Sunflowe: Trunk bypasses in service. Completed Junction structures on Newhope-Place11tia and .District No. 1 trunk lines. Interplant Influent Interceptor, Ellis Force Main, ·Newhope-Plac·entia, and Sunflower Trunks have been connected to structure. METERING AND DIVERSION STRUCTIJRE: Underground structure complete. Installing sluice gates. Laying utility piping. Backfilling area. Installing equipment. Forming and pouring precast wall panels for control building. Contract approximately 73 percent complete to date. P2-20 -PO~~R RELIABILITY PROJECT AT PL\~'T NO. 2 -($158,294) No further onsite work is expected until sufficient equipment has been delivered to complete peripheral lighting and control installations. Contract approximately 58 percent complete to ·date. AGENDA ITEM /126 I-1 ALL DISTRICT3 •. CouNTY SANITAT1m~ D!STRICTS Progress .Report . Treatment Plant Projects Page Two of ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFOl~~IA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENL'E '--"' FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 927C8 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 Pl-9-1 -ADDITIO~AL SECO~TARY TREATMHrr AT RECLA.\lA.TION PLANT NO. 1 -($814,943) DIGESTER GAS COMPRESSOR: Operational. NEW INCINERATOR, CO:..'VEYOR ~\1) RAMS: Conveyor and one new hydraulic ram table operative. New flame. saiety and burner control system for both incinerator.s operable. Second ram table being constructed. PLA!'ff WATER Pt.NP STATION: Operational on new pump •. TRICKLING FILTER: Complete. CITY WELL WATER PUMP STATION:-Complete except for water meter.· NEW WELL: Operable. Contract approximately 99 percent complete to date. P2-21 -DIGESTERS "N" AND·"O" AT PLANT NO. 2 -($1,076,514) DIGESTERS "N'' .i\.~D '10": Installing piping and equipment on digesters. Ready to be filled. DIGESTER CONTROL BUILDING: Structur~lly complete. Installing piping, electrical and mechanical equipment. TUNNELS: Complete. Installing pipinp.- DIGESTER GAS COMPRESSORS: Completing installation. STORM W..\TER PUMP STATION: Completing construction of force main. PAVING: Paving scheduled to follow force main and catch basin completion •. Contract approximately 74 percent complete to date. J-13 -SHOPS A.~TI WAREHOUSE FACILITIES -($1,061,989) SHOP A: Installing plumbing and electrical. Drywalling. Installing bridge crane. Installing ·door and window frames. SHOP B: Roof complete. Installing rough plumbing and electrical. Installing bridge '-"" cranes. Installing door and window frames. WAREHOUSE: Installing door and window frames. Installing plumbing and electrical. AGENDA ITEM k26 I-2 ALL DIS'T'RTCT~ ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Progress Report Treatnent Plant Projects Page Three . J -13 -· SHOPS A~TI WAREHOUSE F AC IL ITI ES (Continued) SITE: Rough graded. Ducts and underground piping installed. Contract approximately 52 percent cooplete to date. · J-4-1 -INCREASED WATER REUSE FACILITIES AT PLANT KO. 2 -($624,643) CITY WATER PUMP STATION: Operational. of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFOt1NIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108'4 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLt.Y, C.AL1r..;~N1A 9~703 (714) 540-29 la (714) 962-24 11 CHLORINE WATER PUMP STATION: Operable and providing plant water for Plant No. z. PLANT WATER PUMP STATION: Completing el~ctrical and mechanical work. CHECK VALVES AT ROTHROCK PUMP STATION: Operational. SHAKER SCREENINGS CONVEYOR AND HOPPER: Erecting new screenings conveyor •. Contract approximately 99 percent complete to date. PW-032 -RESOURCES ~Li\NAGE~!Em CENTER AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 -($30 ,895) Complete. TREATMENr PLANT WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During January Total Work Under Design DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During January Total Work Under Design $ 6,514,650 5,151·,521 230,419 26,500,000 $22, 113 I 053 15,047,701 434,744 780,000 TOTAL AMOUNT UNDER CONfRACT & DESIGN AGENDA ITEM #26 I-3 \ $ 6,514,650 26,500,000 $22, 113, 053 780,000 $55,907,703 .. Copy of letter to JWS RRL Or1g. & enclosures to _ STATE OF CAllFORNIA-'-R::SOUQC~S AGENCY RONALD REAGAN. Go"·"rnor ~ :EPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION P.O. BOX 2390 SACRAMENTO 95811 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: January 28, 1974 The State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation requests annex- ation of 3.55 .acres of Bolsa Chica State Beach to the County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County. Subject parcel is the only portion of the state beach that is situated outside the limits of District 11. Annex- ation of this parcel will enable this Department to negotiate a sewer agree- ment with the District to serve Bolsa Chica State Beach. · Enclosed, please find a reproducible plat and.the legal description of the area for which annexation is requested. It is my understanding that a processing fee is not require~. Fee title to this 3.55 acres of land, except the mineral interest reserved· unto the defendants, was acquiref on June 21, 1971 through a Final Order of Condemnation against Bolsa-Pa1·ific Corporation, et al. Subject document wa~ recorded in Book 9685, Page 825 official records of the county recorder of Orange County. · Should additional information be req~ired or should you wish to have someone present at your board meeting, please contact me at (916) 445-4330. Since funds for the sewer project revert July 1, it is imperative that. action be taken as soon as possible to permit State sufficient time to negotiate the sewer agreement with the District. AGENDA IT?-:M #41 \ Sin~e~ely, . . . / -O{Jt;.~,J,l~/b'~c'?~ William M. Kuramoto Land Agent -J-DISTRICT 11 B I D Eng i.nc.r/t' ~ [ !, ti r:::..,te $ 30, ·11 Z. T A B U L A T I 0 !1 SHEET Date F c.b.wa::u 5, 7 9 7.J 11 : 0 0 A. 11.I. Contract For: . VJ..ve/t-~..i.on. Fa.c.JLlUc~ Cont/ta.ct 7-3A-1, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-1, 7-3E-1 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID . 1. Hai.opo66 & So;i6, Inc.. Ana.he.bn, CciU6oJtnia. $25,978.40 2. · J & S Pa.v.ln.g Co., Inc.. $37,464,00. Palm SpJU.n.9~, Ca.U6oJtnA.a. 3. Meek<.~, I ne.. .. -· $40,916.16 TUv eJTAJ..de, Ca.U 6 OJr.n.<.a. "'-""' 4. Sa.val.a. Con6btuc.:Uon Co. 1 1 nc.. Co~.ta. Mua., ~a.U6oJtnla. $48, n 1.00 s. Sebek CoJtpcr~on .IJtvJ..ne, Ca.U6oJm,la, $48,711.00 6. 7. 8. 9. ~ 10. 11. AG Erm A IT i~~r·~! --K-1 DISTRICT 7 BDLJ/e Enaineer:na Ccrparc;;tion 412 So;..th 1..vr1:1 Stre,,t P 0. Box 1 lS SJnta Ana. C.1:. •:.-,,,a ~~? 7 :2 -Board of Directors COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ~ANGE COUNTY Attention Mr. Fred A. Harper Post Office .Box 8127 -Fountain Valley, CA 92708 -Diversion Facilities Contracts Nos. 7-3A-1, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-1, and 7-3E-1 714 I 54 7-4.J 71. February 6, 197 4 Fivo bids were received for construction of this project. They varied from a low bid of $26, 132.40 to a ·high bid of $48,711.00. The low bid was submitted by Halopotf cind Sons, Inc., of Anaheim, California. The engineer's estimate was $30,912.00. Halopoff and Sons was incorporated in 1973. · Inquiries were mqde regarding perfonnance on contracts with the city of Burbank, the city of Riverside, and the Turner Company in Newport Beach which were compieted since formation of the flnn. Favorable reports were received from a 11 agencies as to qua Ii ty and execution of contracts. Mr. John Ha lopoff, President of the firm, has worked as superintendent on underground construc- tion for a large construction firm prior to fonnation of Ha lopoff and Sons, Inc. A pre-awmd meeting was held February 5, 1974, to discuss project requirements. Those . attending were Mr. John Ha lopoff, Mr. Ray E. Lewis and Mr. Bruce Witcher from the Sanitation District, and myself. Mr. Halopoff stated that he fully understood the intent of the plans and specifications, was .satisfied with their bid, and wished to proceed with the project. . . We recommend that the Board of Directors give consideration to awarding Contracts Nos. 7-3A-1, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-1, and 7-3E-1 to Halopoff and Sons, Inc. BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION ~-)""I. :, t1 A /;;f~-//1 . ,...,.,~. / i. (1 (/t /i. '-( .. l '" · • I .. t / -C< ~"'-/ / Conrad Hohener, Jr., PE . -' Principe.I Civil Engineer Ray • Lewis Chief Engineer County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County AG Ei'JDA ITEM # 4 h Date / K-2 DISTRICT 7 RESOLUTION Nb. 74-26-7 APPROVING MASTER PLAN REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A SEWERAGE FACILITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (MASTER PLAN) WI'I1H IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: S~ction 1. That construction of the Jamboree Boulevard Subtrunk No. 2, Reach 54, Contract No. 7-2D-7, has been completed; and, Section 2. That the Chief Engineer of the District has recommended acceptance of said wo~k as 'having been completed in accordance with District requirements, which said recommendation is hereby rec ei ¥ed and ordered filed;· and, Section 3. That the certain Sewerage Facility Reimbursement Agreement (Master Plan), between County Sanitation District.No. 7 and Irvine Industrial Complex, providing.for reimbursement by the District for said faciliti~s, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 4. That reimbursement in the total amount of $29,710.00, as detailed on the attached.Exhibit "A" is hereby authorized to be made from the Facilities Revolving Fund of the District in accordance with the terms and conditions outlined in said agreement; and, Section 5. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the· District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District, in form approved by th~ General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular, meeting held February 13, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #48 -L-DISTRICT 7 RESOLUTION NO. 74-29-2 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY RE CON~RAC7 NO. 2-14-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SA!H':1ATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH ~HE ATCHISON; TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILHAY COMPANY IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER INTER- CEPTOR FROM KATELLA AVENUE TO LA PALMA AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-2 * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange Cqunty, California ; DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement datea January 21, 1974, wherein The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company·grants to County Sanitation District No. 2 the right to construct the Santa Ana River Interceptor From Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-2, through The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company right nf way in the vicinity of Riverdale-and Orange-Olive Road, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment in the amount of $150.00 for use of said right of way, is hereby autnorized;· and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute. s~id agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 13, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #57 -M-DISTRICT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 74-31-2 ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM KENNETH ISAMU KUBOTA, i\.IJD AUrri{L:HI:=HJG EX1:currroN OP 'IEf.IPOHAF~Y WORKING LICELSE J\GREEMENT HE CONTRAC11 NO. 2-14-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTIKG GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM KENNETH ISAMU KUBOTA, AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF TEMPORARY WORKING LICENSE AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR FROM PLANT ~O. 1 TO KATELLA AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-1 * * * * * * * * * * * * rrhe Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.· 2, of Orange County, California, . . DOES HEREBY RESOLVE,· DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated ---------' wherein property for sanitary sewer purposes, Parcel 4-P, is granted. to Couhty Sanitation bistrict No. 2, is hereby accepted from Kenneth Isa~u Kubota; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said Grant of Easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" ~nd "B", attac.hed hereto and made a part of this. resolution; and, Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is g~anted in connection with construction of Santa Ana River Interceptor from Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, in the vicinity of Santa Ana River at ·Slater Avenue, extended; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California; and, Section 5. That the certain Tempdrary Working License Agreement dated , with Kenneth Isamu Kubota, relative to right of way in connection with construction of Santa Ana River Interceptor ~rorn Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, for temporary use of real property, Parcel 4-T, as described in said acreement, l :·:> hPreby approved; and, N-1 DISTHTCT 11·') '-...I ·Section 6. That the Chairman.and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 7. That payment in the amount of $8., 156. 00 for said Grant of Easement, in the amount of $9,600.00 for removal and restoration of improvemerits, and in the amount of $456.00 for $aid Temporary Working License· Agreement, is hereby authorized. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 13~ 1974. AGENDA ITEM #60 N-2 DISTRICT 2 I I I i I t . I RESOLUTION NO. 74-32-2 ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM GEORGE AND LISA SAITO, AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF TEMPORARY WORKING LICENSE AGREEMENT RE CONTRACT NO. 2-14-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO; 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT GEORGE AND LISA SA1TO, AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF TEMPORARY WORKING LICENSE AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR FROM PLANT NO. 1 TO KATELLA AVENUE, CON'IRACT NO. 2-14-1 * * * * * * * * * * * * ~he Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California,· DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated ~~~~~~~~ , wherein property for sanitary sewer purposes, · Parcel· 2-P, is granted to County Sanitation District No. 2, is hereby accepted from George and tisa Saito; and, S~ction 2. That the real property over which said Grant of Easement is granted is_ more particularly described and sh,own on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of thi$ resolution; and, Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is granted in connect1oo with construction of Santa Ana River I~terceptor From Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, in the vicinity of Santa Ana River at Slater Avenue, ext~nded;. and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, · California; and, Section 5. That the certain ~emporary Working License Agreement~ dated , with George and Lisa Saito, relative to iight. of way in connection with construction of Santa Ana River Interceptor Prom Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, for temporary use of real property, Parcel 2-T, as described in said agreement, is hereby apprcved; and, AG ENDA I'r!.~~~1 I! 61 0-1 DISTTIH':T r~ Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized ar.d directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 7. That payment in the amount or $3~400.00 for said Grant of Easement, and in the amount of $189.00 for said Temporary Working License Agreement, is hereby authorized. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 13, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #61 0-2 DISTRIC~:7-. REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEERS JENNINGS· H.A.LD.ER~LA.N • HOOD A CORPORATION 2001 EAST FOURTH STREET, SUITE ~00, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92705 (714) 83.j-3611 31 JANUARY 1974 BOARD OF DIRECTORS~ COUNTY OF 0RANGt SANITATION DISTRICT No. 2 10844 ELLIS AVENUE fOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 JOB NO. 1636 -EXHIBITS WE HEREBY REQUEST THE ATTACHED AREA BE ANNEXED TO SANITATION DISTRICT No. 2 IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. WE SUBMIT THE; ATTACHED EXHIBITS, INFORMATION AND FEES AND REQUEST YOUR EARLIEST .CON- . SIDERATION FOR THE ANNEXATION. TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTERS RESIDING IN THIS TERRITORY PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION PER VOTER INFORMATION IS ZERO .(0). WE UNDERSTAND ESTATE BUILDERS INTERNATIONAL IS TO PAY TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY $325.00. WE ~LSO UNDERSTAND·THAT PROCESSING FEES DETERMINED TO BE REQUIRED BY OTHER AGENCIES SHALL BE DEPOSITED WITH COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No. 2 FOR SUBMISSION TO SAID AGENCIES EE~ORE THE ANNEXATION WILL PROCEED. WE ALSO UNDERSTAND YOU WILL PREPARE THE FORMAL PE~ITION FOR ANNEXATION AND WILL MAIL IT TO THE APPLICANT FOR SIGNATURE WITH INSTRUCTIONS ~ND A STATEMENT OF THE ADDITIONAL FEES. .. WHEN FORMAL PETITION FOR ANNEXATION ·1s RETURNED TO you, A CASHIER'S CHECK EQUAL TO THE FEE OF $393.00 PER ACRE FOR EACH ACRE ANNEXED WILL BE ENCLOSED. (THIS AMOUNT TO BE REFUNDED IF THE ANNEXATION FAILS.) MJG/sL ENC. cc: [STATE BUILDERS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATES: JE:-i:-<t:-<t;:t ENO. Co., Los Anl{ele:• • JES:"l'IG:t-MCDER\IOTT & HE13'> E:"llG. Co., San Jost>• JE"'SISG:i-BARTLET1' & A:1:10CIATES, Vt>nturn AG ENDA I'IEM # 6 2 -P-DISTRICT 2 M E M 0 R A N D U M February 6, 1974 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer COUNTY SANITATION OiSTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVE~t.•i= FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALtFcru~1A 92703 (714) 540-29' v (714) 962-241 I SUBJECT: Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract Nos. 2-14-1 & 2-14-2 2-14-1 Work to date has been completed in the area of Katella Avenue, leaving only one 3,000-foot section of pipe to be piaced south of Harbor Boulevard. Contractor estimates co~pleting the placement of pipe in early March. Open cutting through Warner Avenue will take place approximately the end of February. Two lanes of traffic will be maintained during this phase of the construction. 2-14-2 A preconstruction meeting was held which resolved most preliminary construction matt~rs. The steel shortage has affected pipe delivery and has made an exact construction date and location ·commitment impossible. Excavation for the pipe jacking pit at .Glass ell Street ha·s begun and wi 11 continue until completed later this month. Contractor will try to begin pipe laying operations by March 11, 1974. REL:BEW:ss AGENDA ITF.M #63 -Q-DISTRICT 2 -()\ z t-z lf <-1 (f ;.:--'. \'1 ll. ll I "~ © 0 '-!.' <I (. 7 ~ <1 (! ~ ~ . ~~~ -.l~ &" ~1> ~~~, # ~'4t ..... ~l>-,L~ ~~ '>-.... ~.t. ·.• 6'>-¢.V-\ c,+'><l G;)>~ cP"..sF ~ .~<\~~~~O· ·-·'1- I LE6C:ND · # . . , . • .r ..; coN1~cT<CflZ-l4-t~ SANTA ANA Rt\Je~ lNie-~ePToR ...... _ ........... "' ............. -..... I==( sAN1A ANA ~Ncatc? 1Wte1'.Cmote .. .. .. r.· --CtJ1nr 1~lt: . ---.To be. L''O./J .'5 /;"h'C-/eel Ml~~SoF84 ''PI~: B ~z. · Co~T~A~i AWA~Orot 9-~-7Z · ~T: C:,,2.74,U.OR , ,. 'iS01e'CU e"O FO~ CC>MPl.M'ION1 ~ -.• Z· 74 ,, . t.-. r .:r: ~:,i. ;'i .• :n.·· ~ ' -~-.t, .... 'l~t"'}.4~ : ... '\\:f~'.i~--k~~~~·'' ...... •Q".:l'cy 't-"~l f' , ... ~ .· .. ' . .. . .. .. ... "'"""""""'"""'"""""'"'"""" == Sii.NiA ANA tz.\Vr;:R tN1~CE'P'TO~ 4 M t\.1?5 or-78 "p [p~ CONi!<.AC1 "\::f "Z-14-'2 ~ S ~NT~ A N ~ RIVfR \Nifr<C~PTO ~ C ON'T ~A c; ·~WAr<o~o : 11-14.,3 ------~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~===~-----c o~;. ~3,~4s,~3 s SCHrotx ro FO~ COM P l.M l ON: DEC."1~14 ---~ornp !ele ----~ b~ con;;-!ruc.fet! ,. • -~ /?OLJ/e Enaineertna Cofpor~ti::in .J.1; S:wrh l;·,-;n St-.~··r P. 0 Box 17.:; ·Board of Directors COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY Attention Mr.· Fred A. Harper, General Manager Post Office Box 1728 Fountain Valley, California 92708 . .. Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5, 6, 7, and 8 Contract No. 3-20 February 6, 197 4 Pursuant to Mr. Harper's request, we are pleased to submit our proposal for furnishing pro- fessional engineering services for the preparation of final plans and specifications for subj~ct proiect as set forth in the preliminary engineering report dated October 1973. . . This interceptor is part of the original mcster'plcn of trunk sewer facilities adopted in June ·of 1968 and is c continuation of the Knott Interceptor Sewer which begins at the intersection of Ellis Avenue and Brookhurst Street in the city of Fountain Val fey end ·runs generally in a northerly direction through the district 1 term incting ct Artesia Avenue and Rostratc Street in the city of Buena Park. The Knott Interceptor is the ·backbone interceptor sewer in the master plan. Upon completion, it will relieve the MPler-Holder trunk which, at present, functions as the.main interceptor sewer.and, for the most part, is currently flowing at or near peak capacity. · Reach 5 of the Knott Interceptor begins j·1st north of Westminster Avenue on Golden West Avenue in the city of Westminster, extends northerly in Golden West, crossing under the Garden Grove Freeway, and terminates in Knott Street at Lampson Avenue in the city of Garden Grove. Reach 6 begins at this location end runs northerly-in Knott to Kate JI a Avenue in the city of Stanton. Reach 7 beg iris ct the intersecticn of Knott and Kate Ila, proceeds northerly in Knott through the city of Anaheim, and terminates at Orcngethorpe Avenue in the city of Buena Park. Reach 8 continues in Knott to Artesia Avenue, t~en easterly in Artesia under the Santa Ana Freeway to Rostrata Avenue. Tote I length of the four reaches is approximately 8-1/3 miles. In addition, two subtrunks, each 1/2 mile in length, on Bal I Road and Crescent Avenue are included in the project. The total estimated cost, including construction, engineering, design surveying, construc- tion staking, construction inspection, in-plant inspection,· legal, administration, and incidental costs, is $10, 136,000. The preliminary engineering report for this facility has been reviewed by the cities of Westminster, Garden ·Grove, Stanton, Cypress, Anaheim, AGENDA I'rEM #70 R-1 DISTRICT 3 ' County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County -2-February 6, 1974 and Buena Patk. To date, alignment approval·has been given by the city councils of Stanton, Cypress, and Buena Park, with approval from the remaining three councils expected shortly. . . It is currently proposed that construction of the interceptor be accomplished under two contracts-Reaches 5 and 6 being combined for one contract, and Reaches 7 end 8 for the second contract. However, if, during the design perio_d, it appea~ advantageous to the district to split the project into three separate contracts because of material supply prob- lems, lead time for manufactured pipe, etc., this will be done. In that case / a part of , Reach 7 wil I become the second contract with the remaining portion of 7 and Reach 8 comprising the third contract. · . · We will provide the following professional engineering services for the final plans and · specifications a·nd construction phases of the proposed project. l. Make arrangements for and coordinate fie Id surveys, gather benchmark data, existing · surveys, etc. If pavement coring is required for final design, make arrangements for outside services. 2. Research underground utilities records. Includes both field and office contacts with public and municipal utility compani·es. 3. As required to avoid conflicts between proposed project work and existing utilities, make arrangements for exploratory holes to expos_e existing uti I ities for position and ·elevation. Obtain excavation pemiits. Solicit proposals from contracto~ if district forces are not available for explorat6ry work. Contact city and state inspection departments. Mork and survey exposed uti I ities. 4. .Prepare engineering data for r-egulatory permit applications that may be required by the cities of Westminster, Garden Grove, Cypress, Stanton, Anaheim, and Buena Park, the Orange County Flood Control District, and the .State Division of Highways·. 5. Make a general foundation investigation, and report. Secure district's staff approval of soi Is engineer. 6. Prepare detai fed plans and specifications. 7. Review preliminary and final plans and specifkations with cities of Westminster, Garden Grove, Cypress, Stanton, Anaheim, and Buena Park, and the State Division of Highways. Receive traffic control, detour, and pavement replacement requirements. '-"' R-2 DISTRICT ~ . ; County Sanitation Distrh:t No. 3 of Orange County -3-February 6, 197 4 8. Process final plons end specifications through State Division of Highways. 9. Process railway undercrossings through Southern Pacific Railroad Company. 10. Process final plans through utility companies. 11. ~rocess storm channel undercrossings through Orange County Flood Control District. 12. Prepare estimates of quantities and costs. 13. Deliver original tracings of pla.ns and reproducible plates of the specifications for the district's use in_ preparing the necessary number of copies for record purposes and ~is tribution to prospective bidders, etc. 14 •. Prepare legal descriptions .. and plats for' right-of-way ·acquisitia"ns as required ~or foci I ity lo cation and construction. 15. Assist the district staff in the preparation of environmental impact reports as required by local and stat_e ordinances. 16. Assist the district in securing bids, in the tabulation and analysis of bid results, and in letting of the contract. 17. Attend pre-award conferences with contractor, district staff; cities of Westminster, Garden Grove, Cypress, Stanton, Anaheim, and Buena Park, and the State Division of Highways. · 18. Check shop and working drawings C?S may be submitted·by the contractor. 19. Review laboratory reports on material tests and inspection and correlate such reports with the intention of the pl~ns and specifications.· 20. Furnish consultat!on and advice to the di.strict or its agent during construction. 21. Observe initial operation of the project, witnessing ·performance tests as required by the specifications, and reporting same to the district. 22. Make a final inspection and report of the completed project with a representative of the district or its agent. 23. Prepare record drawings when construction work has been completed and accepted by the district. This shall mean the original tracings of the plans will be modified if necessary because of deviations from the original work. Since the district wi II carry R-3 DISTRICT '") - ' County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County February 6, 197 4 out inspection of the project, modifications to the original tracings will be based upon information supplied to the er:gineer by the district. The original tracings, after modific.ation, wil I become district property. Our total fee for the proposed project, including the preliminary engineering phase arid the design and construction phases, is $27 4, 660. In cccdrdance with our agreement for preliminary engineering study fees, we will credit $23,715 towards the total fee, leaving a remaining fee pf $250,945. ·For district accounting purposes, we suggest the fee be divided as follows: S 100, 620 for Reaches 5 and 6 contract, and S 150, 325 for Reaches 7 --and 8 contract. It is also suggested that payment be monthly Of} a percen~age-complete basis up to 90 percent at time of de livery of plans and specifications/ with 100 percent payment when the work is completed and accepted by the district. Fie Id surveys wi 11 be required in or_der to prepare the plans and specifications. These surveys will include taking topography and culture within the project 1.imits. We propose that all field surveys necessary for design be performed "on a per diem basis at the fo I lowing hourly rates: (1} three-man sur-Vey party -$60/hour, (2) two-m.an. survey party -$48/hour, and (3) licensed surveyor - $22/hour. Payment is to be monthly as invoiced. If construction staking is requested, • . these rate.swill remain in effect u·ntil June 30, 1975, ct wnich time·they wo.uld be subject to revision. Should the district ·request work beyond the scope of this proposal, we suggest the per diem method of compensation. Our current fee schedule is on file with the district. - We propose that all .outside services required and approved by the district, soch cs pavement . · coring, plant inspection for quality con'"rol, and mcteria.ls used on the project construction, be paid directly by the district upon pre~ntation of a statement for such outside services with the engineer's certification. If we are authorized to proceed with this work at the February 13; 1974, board meeting, w~ can have plans and specifications ready for advertising of bids in July l974 on Reaches 5 and 6, and in November 197 4 on Reaches 7 and 8. BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION /-; I /'l / ; ·a ( //,VV!l t (~ .yl / ' ~. t · .. 'Y ;/' / ,_); ..... -'1.' / l L (. (_ v I ~ ILl I:.,( '-I /'/" , I Conrad Hohener, Jr., PE / Principal Civil Engineer AGEHDA ITr.r.: #7 0 R-4 DrsrrRICT 3 ' .. . RESOLUTION ·NO. 74-34-3 AUTHORI:ING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED FROM DOROTHY T. PECK FLYNN 2 ET AL. RE CONTRACT 3-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED FROM DOROTHY T. P~CK FLYNN, ET AL. IN CO!\~JECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF TH~ KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACT NO. 3-17 * * * * *' * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain Grant Deed dated December 10, 1973, wherein property for sanitary sewer purposes is granted to County Sanitation District No. 3, is hereby accepted from" Dorothy T. Peck Flynn, et .al.; and, Sectipn 2. That the real property over which said Grant De~d is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B''~ attached hereto· and made a part of this resolution·; and, Section 3. That. said Grant Deed is granted in connection with construction of the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 and 3, Contr~ct No. 3-17, in the vicinity of Newland Avenue, south of the San Diego rreeway;. ~nd, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be authorized and directed to record said Grant Deed in the Official Records of Orange·county, California; and, Section 5. That payment in the amount of $30,000.00 for said Grant Deed is hereby authorized. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 13, 1974. AGENDA ITEM #71 -S-DISTRICT 3 •. MtMORANDUM February 6, .1974 TO: Fred A. H.ctrper,. General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer SUBJECT: .Knott Interceptor, Contract No; 3-17 COUNTY SANITATI01~ DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFO~NIA 927'-"' (714} 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 All 96" pipe laY,ing for this project is completed. Remaining work on the main line consists of completing the junction structure at Newland and Balsa, plastic liner inspection and final clean up. This work, to be ·completed within three weeks, will leave the 96'' sewer ready for service. Construction of the 18" VCP in ~IcFadden Avenue continues without problem. Traffic flow is unrestricted in both directions~· One third of the total 18" VCP footage is now complete with the remaining estimated to be placed by February 15, 1974. Cross gutter and curbing at Newland and Heil Streets have been constructed for the City of Huntington Beach. Numerous problems with drainage in· the area warranted the extra work. Final paving was placed on Talbert, Magnolia, Slater and Newland Streets, completing all paving over the 96" line. McFadden is to be paved after . February 15, 1974. REL:BEW:ss -T-DISTRICT.--~ ' .. . I I .. .. I ....... ------·---·· -----· ·-· -. .,•m·1:wm~m·s•-----,@~--. -Jin ___ _ HUN11N6'TON e>t=-U:.H . -Ef a z J Camf'le /~ · /,, E!/!~ I 8r~<Jf /;u/'5/ rt{ 0 . MA6NOLIA FOUNT~lW 'JALL~ t7 -~ Wf'SiMIN5i~ . ~ ~ .. tLJ :_) 7 CO UN'TY OF' ~ O RA N61.9' ... -t r---I I I . I I . L :> z lL L----~ IL ~ Y. L f 6END i ·~ I ' r : ! ' I I i. c . • I MEMORANDUM February 6, ·1974 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer SUBJECr: Knott Interceptor, Contract No .. ·3-18 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 . 10344 ELLIS AVF~~UE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORl'ilA 92703 (7l 4) 540-29 l 0 (7 t 4) 962-241 I .Work on this project has extended along Balsa Avenue to Monroe Street, 1,400 feet east of Beach Boulevard. Construction problems have caused. some delay, but an increased construction rate can be expected this month. The pipe heading has been moved back to the original work area, 200 feet west of Newland, so as to reduce the inconvenience to business traffic easterly of Beach Boulevard. The remaining 900 feet of 96" RCP between Beach Boulevard and Newland Street is estimated to be placed and compacted by the end of this month. Compaction requirements have been ··et from Beach Boulevard to Van Buren Street. Curb and gutter work has commenced and will continue moving easterly. The first course paving will immediately follow and can be expected during the week of February 11, 197_4. REL:BEW:ss AG EHD {\ :rrrr-.~~I r 7 4 -U-DISTRICT 3 . t- \j) --, I ...... . . '-·· . 0 8 ·3 tit "1 p v W~T ~ IN '5T~i< '"'~ -"11 '>kl Al. P A~l( ~ ~ Ill I COUN i Y OF ORAN G~ t z ~ r LI'. ll ~~ ~ z ~ ··' 3 ~ t i z ~ ' , ' I '. . ~ f 1" ~' .. 51 I .. ... I .., tU ! I .LJ L:2_;.·'_;: -:'"3 -1 r--==j ...,t111111u11 1u 11n11 11u11•f1u u1u11n111t.111111tu ~ K'~TT 1 N i\:'~Crf1'1 0 ~ MI Lf'S o F ')~;. 11 ?I Fe-: 3 C ONT t:2 AC T AWAr2..0 ·~0 I 'c --I · 1 -~ Cr. c.r . ,, . ..: . ., . . . . V ..,,j ·~~; ... ·..,1J"-.... , • '5CHE-O ~JL f 0 FOR. CO MP~r:r-T I O N : .:1 · t .. ;4 f 'T ' ·Agenda Item No 2 4 (a) RESOLUTION NO. 74-23 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 71-3, AS AMENDED A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 71-3, AS AMENDED * * * * * * *'* * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3', 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER: Section 1. That Section 2, Subsection A, of Resolution No. 71-3, as amended, is hereby further amended by the deletion therefrom of the following position of ·employment: Effective 12/1/73" . Effective 12/i/74 Position Classification Range No. Salary Range No. Salary Utility Man -Operations 43B $591/735 44 $608/755 Section 2. That Section 2, Subsection A of Resolution No. 71-3, as amended, is hereby further amended by the addition thereto o~ the following position classification to the Joint Administrative Organization, a salary for which is hereby e.stablished as follows:· Effective 12/1/73 ·Eff~cti ve 12/1/74 Position Classification Range No. . · Salary Range No. Salar;y. Operator Trainee 43B -$591/735 44 $608/755 Section 3. That in addition to the salaries set forth in Section 2 and Section 3 of· Resolution No. 73-179, effective January 1974, the additional amount of forty dollars ($40.00) per calendar month shall be added to each step rate for the following position classifications: Shift Supervisor Plant Operator IV Plant Operator III Plant Operator II Plant Operator·I Operator Trainee Apprentice II/Operations 1, Section 4. That effective March 1, 1974, Section 17 of Resolution No. 71-3, as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows: "Section 17. Personnel designated as shift employees as provided in Section 3 of Resolution.No. 70-3, as amended, who are required· to work on shifts other than the regular daytime shifts shall receive shift differential pay as follows: 4:00 p.m. to Midnight Shift The flat sum of $3.50 for each shift of seven or more hours worked after 4:00 p.m. and before midnight; or, The flat sum of $1.75 for each shift of four or more hours, but less than seven hours, worked after 4:00 p.m. and before midnight. Midnight to 8:00 a.m. Shift The flat sum of $4.00 for each shift of seven or more· hours worked after midnight and before·8:00 a.m.; or, The flat sum of $2.00 for each shift of four or more· hours, but · 1ess than seven hours, work.ed after midnight and before 8:00 a.m~ Said sums shall be in addition to the employee's regular salary and shall be paid quarterly. Said compensation·is separate and apart from overtime pay provided herein and any employee not designated as entitled to shift differential pay shall receive compensation for overtime as. provided herein.'' Section 5. That effective January.l, 1973, the following paragraph be added to Section 16 of Resolution No. 71-3, as amended:· "Not withstanding the above, overtime payment for Operations Division employees shall not be subject to the hereinabove established twenty-four (24) hours per month limitation." Section 6. That any other.resolutions or motions or portions hereof that conflict herewith are hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and, Section 7. That except as otherwise set forth above, this resolution shall become effective January 1, 1974. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 13, 1974. II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Californi1 DISTRICT 3 ·JOINT BOARDS SUPPLEMENTA.L AGENDA . ITEMS FEBRUARY 13J 1974 -7:30 P.M. Post Ottice Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA (3a) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt fr om ~he City of La Palma appointing Jake J. Westra as·substitute alternate to attend February 13, 1974 meeting ALL DISTRICTS (15) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 74-20, to receive and file bid · tabulation and ·recommendation and awarding contract for Additional Boiler Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-035, to Porter Boiler Service, Inc.,. in the amount of $37, 573. 00 . See page "IV" (16a )-.. Consideration of Resolution No. 7 4-36, d:irecting the work be complet e d by Districts' force account for Repair of Two Gas Spheres at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Job No . PW-036. See page · "V" (28) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolv ing Fund warrant books for signature o f the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing payment of claims listed on page "I" (29) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by The Foxboro Company against Mel Gorham Electric Company, Contractor for Pow e r Reliability Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-20, in the amount of $7,800.19 DISTRICT 5 (35) Consideration of motion approving warrants. See page "II" DISTRICTS 3 & 11 (42) Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrant s . See p ag e "II" DISTRICT 1 1 (43) Co n s i d eration of motion app~o vin g warrants. Se e page "I I I " DI STRI CT 7 (53) Consid e rati o n of mo tion appro ving warrants. Se e ·page "III" DISTRICT 2 (64) Consideration of motion approving warrants. See page "II" DISTRICT 3 (72a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1, to the plans a nd s p ec ifications f o r Additions to Seal Beach Boulevard Pump Station, Contract No. 3-12-1, authorizing an ext e nsion of 38 c a lendar days to the contract with Jenkins Construction Company . See page "VI" (75) Consideration of motion approving warrants. See page "II" -2- WARRANT NO. 22099 2210() 221()1 22102 103 ~104 22105 22106 22107 22108 22109 22110 22111 22112 22113 22114 22115 22116 22117 22118 22119 22120 22121 22122 22123 22124 22125 22126 22127. ~128 22129 22130 22131 22132 22133 22134 22135 22136 22137 22138 22139 22140 22141 22142 22143 22144 22145 22146 22147 22148 22149 22150 ~151 ~152 22153 22154 22155 22156 22157 22158 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Air Conditioning Supply Co., Filters $ Alex Fish Company, Ecological Research All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings, Belts & Fittings Allied Supply Company, Valves American Compressor Co., Compressor Parts American Lock & Supply, Inc., Hardware Ameren Corrosion Control, Cleaners & Protective Coatings· Amoco Reinforced Plastics Co., Piping City of Anaheim, Power . The Anchor Packing Co., Gaskets Apco Supply, Controls Applied Science Laboratories, Inc., Lab Supplies Associated Concrete Products, Concrete Vaults -_ Assoc·. of Metro. Sewerage Agencies, Conf. Registration Fees Bailey Meter Co., Filters Bank of America, Bond & Coupon Collection Barnes Delaney, Conveyor Belt Repair Barney's Hole Digging Service, Inc.,-Equipment Rental Beckman Instruments, Inc., Lab Supplies Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator R~pair Bender Machine, Inc., Compressor Repair Black & Decker Mfg. Co., Equipment. Parts Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Magneto Repair Bristol Park Medical Group, P~e-employment Exams Broadlick Art Supply, Drafting Supplies Building News, Inc., Technical Manuals C & R Reconditioning Co., Engine & Compressor Repair Cal State Seal Co., Seals Calif. Assoc. of Sanitation Agencies, Membership & Conf. Registration Fees State of California, Public Employees Retirement System, Actuarial Study . John Carollo Engineers, Printing for SWRCB Submittal College Lumber Company, Inc., Building Materials Consolidated Electrical Distr., Electrical Supplies Constructors Supply Co., Tools & Hardware · Copeland Motors, Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa Datsun, Truck Parts County of Orange, Printing · Cramer Electronics, Inc., Electronic Supplies Mr. Crane, Crane Rental Crane Packing Co., Dewatering Supplies Crest Leasing, Leased Vehicles · Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplies Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies Daily Pilot, Bid Notice P-020 C. R. Davis Supply Co., Hoses & Pump Parts (MO 9-12-73) DeGuelle & Sons Glass Co., Glass Del Chemical Corp., Maintenance Supplies Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling & Concrete Sawing Diesel Control, Engine Repair Dollinger Corp., Compressor Parts Ducommun Metals & Supply Co., Aluminum Wilber R. Eads, Emplo~ree Mileage. Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring (MO 12-14-66) Enterprise Printing Co., Printing Erawan Garden Hotel, CASA Workshop Expense Fischer & Porter Co., Telemetering Supplies, Pump Parts & Flowmeter (MO 7~11-73) · William Fox, Employee Mileage France Products Division, Compressor·Repair I-1 AMOUNT 116.55 52.5() 817.02 296 .52 . 144.91 29.86 . 1,434.17 613.28 47.09 58.80 7.14 99.83 659 .14 65.00 134.64 18.43 190.20 320.25 488.2() 19 .oo 328.40 21.53 524. 75 51.50 30.07 142.32 565.00 116.05 1,520.00 .25.00 147.00 180.72 4,608.;58 457.69 15.71 31.45 9.50 37.42 2,294.13 182.17 144.50 40.00 48.18 146.72 7.71 3,912.30 11.26 38.89 281.25 57 .go 1,707.45 80.85 8~70 681.66 2,715.oJ 84.17 206.94 3, 525.05 22.5() 200.00 iARRANT NO. 221~9 22100 22161 22162 22163 22164 22165 22166 22167 22168 22169 22170 22171 22172 22173 22174 22175 22176 ,·-22177 22178 22179 22180 22181 22182 22183 22184 22185 22186 22187 22188. 22189 22190 22191 22192 22193 22194 22195 22196 22197 22198 22199 22200 22201 22202 22203 22204 22205 22206 22207 22208 22209 22210 22211 22212 22213 22214 22215 22216 22217 22218 22219 2222~ 22221 IN FAVOR OF Freeway Machine & Welding Shop, Machining City of Fullerton, Water GAF Corporation, Repair Printer Garden Grove Lumber & Cement, Building Materials General Electric Co., Electric Supplies General Electric Supply Co., Electric Supp11es General Telephone Co. Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine (Contract 1-1-73) Goes Lithographing Co., Office Supplies Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Parts Halsted & Hoggan, Inc., Pump Parts Hanson, Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester, Audit Services Hansons Water Works Supply Co., Coupling Hardware Systems Co., Lab Supplies Charl·es G. Hardy, Inc., Hardware Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting & COD Expenses Harrington Industrial Plastics, Pipe Supplies & Freight Haul Away Containers, Trash Disposal Curtis Hayes, Employee Mileage Hersey Products, Inc., Pump Parts Hertz Car Leasing Division, Leased Vehicles Hilton Inn, AMSA Workshop Expense Honeywell, Inc., ·Telemetering Supplies & Controls Howard Supply Co., Pipe Supplies, Valves, Tools & Hardware City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Beach Art Gallery, ·certificate Frame Hydro Products, ·Ecological Research Inland Nut & Bolt Co., Hardware Int'l. Assoc. of Plumbing & Mechanical Officials, Technical Manuals · Int'l. Biophysics Corp., Ecological. Research Int' 1. Business Machines, Mtce. Agrmt. & Office· Supplies Int'l. Harvester Co., Truck Parts Jet Print, Printing Jones Chemicals, Inc., Ecological Research Edward E. Just, CASA Workshop Expense Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies Keith & Associates, Survey Services Kll)g Bearing, Inc., Bearings, V-Belts & Seals Kirst Pump & Machine Works,. Pump Parts Kleen Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tools, Hdwe. & Equip. Repair. L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Services Lewis Bros. Battery, Batteries Los Angeles Type Founders, Inc., Printing Supplies A. J. Lynch & Company, Hardware Mc Calla Bros. Pump & Drilling, Pump Parts (MO 11-14-73) R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., Tractor Parts Mc Coy Ford Tractor, Tractor Parts John Mc Cullough, Employee Mileage Me Master-Carr Supply Co., Freight Marine Biological Consultants, Marine Ecology Services Charles Meriam Company, Instrumentation Metropolitan Supply Co., Gauges Moore Products Co., Controls Morgan Equipment Co., Truck & Equipment Parts E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Covers National Chemsearch, Cleaners National Lumber & Supply Co., Hardware & Tools Nationwide Papers, Paper City of Newport Beach, Water Newport Skyways, Inc., Charter Flight for Aerial Photos C. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel Retainer & CASA Workshop AMOUNT 471.o:J 5. 31' 24.50 396.97 138.35 54.P~ 3,115.~. 2,840.04 8 ,....~ .b..,., 29.90 374 .85 371.25 45.°15 137.55 78.34 159 .28 116.44 125.00 i8.oo .86.31 . 562 .25 109.48 233.71 3,579.96 18.78 12.34 150 .67 276.67 23.94 125 "0 36~1 51.67 . ·54 .60 74.84 . 5.20 783.17 328.00 333.22 1,264.80 292.57 359 .29 1,522.48 1,701.63 136.24 41.90 36. 54 19,950.00 367.70 10. 57 126.96 16.9J 161.66 109.28 51.41 48--92 24'-"34 297.10 829.25 47.C>l 57 .44 14.27 36.25 Expense . 1, 025. 00 I-2 WARRANT NO. 22222 22223 22224 22225 22226 ~2227 ~228 22229 22230 22231 22232 22233 22234 22235 22236 22237 22238 22239 22240 22241 22242 22243 22244 22245 22246 22247 22248 22249 22250 ?2251 ·2~2 ~ ,_; 22253 22254 22255 22256 22257 22258 22259 22260 22261 22262 . 22263 22264 22265 22266 22267 22268 22269 22270 22271 22272 22273 22274 22275 22276 ~277 ~278 22279 2228:) 22281 22282 .22283 22284 IN FAVOR OF Oakite Products, Inc., Cleaner Oda Nursery, Inc., Gardening Supplies Pacific Coast Glass, Truck Repair Pacific Supply Co., Roofing Supplies Pacific Telephone Co. Ron Parker, Employee Mileage Parkwood Western Distr. Center, Building Materials Peat, Marwick< Mitchell & Co., Data Processing Study (MO 9 -12-7 3 J Polaris Battery Co., ~atteries Poly Form, Paint Postmaster, Postage The Lee Potter Company, Inc., Freight Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage Quality Building Supply, Building Materials Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal The Rayline Co., Journal·Binding The Register, Employment Ad Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Parts Jack H. Ross, Employee Mileage San Bar, Inc., Ecological Resea~ch Supplies Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Rewind & Repair Santa Ana Electronics Co., Electronic Parts $ AMOUNT 106.26 18.06 288.52 39.25 462.41 14.85 QS.55 5,979.89 91.77 467.03 400.-00 8.20· 42.66 52.08 40~00 549.78 91.76 1,820.60 33.06 71.87 82.94 701.21 Santa·Ana River Basin Section, CWPCA Conf. Registration Fees Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies 9.27 114.00 427.39 141.75 514.12 Scientific Products; Lab Supplies Sherwin ·williams Co., Paint Supplies A. H. Shipkey, Inc., Truck Tires John Sigler, Employee Mileage Signal Flash Co., Inc., Barricade Rental Fred Sinasek, Employee Mileage Singer Business Machines, Maintenance Agreement Smith Bros. Co., Fabricating So. Cal Forming, Inc., Pump Repair South Orange Supply, Piping Supplies Southern Calif. Edison Co. Southern Calif. Gas Co. Southern Calif. Water Co. Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water Speed-E Auto Parts, Truck Parts . Staggs Worm Farm, Ecological Research Supplies Standard Concrete Material, Inc., Concrete -Standard Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline, Oil & Diesel Fuel State Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies Sully Miller Contracting Co., Paving Surveyors Service Co., Survey Supplies & Equip. Repair J. Wayne Sylvester, AMSA Workshop Expense T & H Equipment Inc., Truck Parts Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage . 39 Stake & Building Supplies Co., Survey Supplies Title Insurance & Trust, Title Information Union Oil Co., Gasoline Union Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline United Auto Parts, Truck Parts United Reprographics, Inc., Printing Utilities Supply Co., Tools VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies Valvate Associates, Valve Parts & Dewatering Supplies Vaniman Camera, Photo Processing & Supplies John Waples.R.S., Odor Consultant Warren & Bailey Co., Inc., Hardware . 281.20 17.25 174.oo 47.10 32.75 67~20 21.00 43.04 38,241.55 1,334.50 . 3.00 47~88 565.13 18.9J 159 .25 1,413.21 339.15 625.0G 290.09 . 12.65 132.50 35.82 19.11 386.88 148.55 1,021.02 915.11 84.26 231.J.+9 105. 78 799 .. 39 . 119.82 208.80 26J·.·71 Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc., Engine Parts & Freight (Resos. 73-40,41,83) 18,922.07 Wholesale Electric Co., Electric Supplies 12.6:) I-3 WARRANT NO. 22285 22286 22287 22288 22289 22290 22291 22292 22293 22294 22295 22296 22297 22298 22299 22300 22301 2230.2 22303 22304 22305 22306 22307 22308 IN FAVOR OF Wilmington Instrument Co., Inc., Controls Russell Wold, Employee Mileage World Travel Bureau, Inc., Various Mtg. Travel Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage John M. Wright, Employee Mileaee Xerox Corp., Reproduction Service Everett H. York Co., Filters TOTAL JOINT OPERATING CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF $ Expenses $ B & J Construction Co., Contractor PW-035 $ John Carollo Engrs., Engineering -Plant Construction Daily Pilot, Bid Notices A-070 & A-071 E.T.I. & Kordick, Contractor P2-ll-l & I-8-3 Freedom Newspapers, Bid Notices PW-035 & PW-036 General Radio Company, Test Equipment Hemisphere Constructors, Contractor P2-21 Hinde Engineering Co., Water Recorder James E. Hoagland Co. & Hoagland Engr. Co., Contr. Pl-9-1 Howard Supply Co., Lockers Ronald L: Kolpack, Consultant J-10 Litigatio~ Motorola, Inc., Communication Equipment J. Ray Construction Co., Contractor J-13 Rutan & Tucker, Special Counsel J-10 Litigation Southern Calif. Edison Co., Facilities Relocation I-8-3 Richard Terry & Associates, E.I.R. 73-74 Project F. T. Ziebarth & Ziebarth & Alper, Contractor ~-4-1 AMOUNT 93.33 85.38 831.01 28.74 10.50 933.h6 100~ 156,819.63 27,805.50 36,101.67 8.85 50,980.00 131.86 . 403. 76 53,420.65 2,074.46 3,090.11 876.65 450.00 1,749.30 105,136.91 . 4,910.71 ·1,698.71 2,500~ 6,110.00 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING $ 297,449.14 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF $ 454,~68.77 I-4 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 22309 .22310 22311 22312 22~3 22314 22315 22316 22317 22317A 22317B 22317c 22318 22319 22320 22321 22322 Brownyard Structural Steel, Temporary Easement 2-14-1 County of Orange, Compaction Tests 2-14-1 Kasler Corporation & L.H. Woods & Sons, Contractor 2-14-2 Lowry and Associates, Engineering Service 2-15, 2-16, 2-17 and 2-18, Alignment Studies 2-14-3 · City of Orange, Facility Relocation 2-14-1 James D. Ray, Hazel M. Ray, H. J. Lorenz, Walter W. Charamza, and Thelma. M. Charamza, Grant of Easement and ·Temporary Working Agreement 2-14-1 . Safeco Title Insurance, Title Report 2-14-1 Sully Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 2-14-1 ·Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Testing 2-14-1 The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company Right-of-way 2-14-2 Kenneth Isamu Kubota, Right-of-way 2-14-1 George & Lisa Saito, Right-of-way 2-14-1 · DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Orange County Freedom Newspapers, Public Notice Annexation 3-E ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS TN FAVOR OF $ $ Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Service 3-19, 3-12-1, Preliminary Engineering 3-20, Construction Survey 3-17, 3-18, Design Survey 3-19 $ Jenkin Construction Company, Contractor·3-12-l .~esting Engineers, Inc., Pipe Testing A. G. Tutor Co., Inc & N. M. Saliba Co~, Contractor 3-18 AMOUNT. 2,500.00 133 .. 58 7,312.50 15,855.60 3,130.91 5,925.00 15.00 124,737.00 4,720.00 150.00 . 18, 212. 00 3,585.00 186,276.65 208.69 7,393.75 41,396'113 3,887.00 173,619.00 $ 226,295.88 22323 22324 22?'?5 DISTRICTS NOS 3 & 11 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF County of Orange, Compaction Tests 3-17 J. F. Shea. Co., Inc., Contractor 3-17 Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Testing II-1 $ $ 119.75 86,934.oo 377.00 87,430.75 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 22326 22327 City of Newport Bea.ch, Connection Fee Collection Rewes Engineering Company, Manhole Repair II-2 AMOUNT· 314.88 2,480.00 $ 2, 794. 88. ~ DISTRICT NO. 7. OPEHATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 22328 22329 22330 22331 22332 22333 Boyle Engineering, Los Alisos Feasibility Study FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Preliminary Engineering 7-6-5, Engineering Service 7-2D-7. $ $ Orange County Freedom Newspapers, Bid Notice 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-3E-l DISTRICT NO. 11 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF $ $ Orange County Freedom Newspapers, Bid Notice 11-12 . $. Keith & Associates, Engineering Service 11-12, ll-10-2R, Construction Survey 11-12 Kordick & Son, Inc., Contractor 11-12 AMOUNT l, 200. 00 ' 4,557.50 91.45 4z648.95 5,848.95 82.18 15,393.10 22772.00 $ 18z247.28 III B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N SHEET Engineer's Estir.ute sso,ouo.oo· Date Februarv 11, 1974 -11: 00 A.M. Contract For:. .Additional Boiler Facilities at Plant No. 2 Job No. PW-0~5 l. 2. 3. 4. 5. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11 .. CONTRACTOR Porter Boiler Service, Inc. Long Beach, Cal.ifornia Hydro-Mechanical Cor.ipany Hawthorne, California Triad Piping & Construction Company Gardena, Ca.lifornia Big Valley Plumbing & Supplies, Inc~ Long Beach, California Brandel ~echanical Downey, California Bovee & Crail Construction Company .Paramount, California Los Angeles Air Conditioning, Inc~ Los Angeles, California J. Putnam Henck, A Corp. & Henck Pro, A Joint Venture San Bernardir.o. California -IV- TOTAL BID $37,573.00 • 39, 9·00~ 00 43~746.00 44,494·. 00 .. 44,850. 00 41,114.00 .• 48 J 271. 00 49,667.00 ALL DISTHIC'TS v • • ... RESOLUTION NO. 74-36 DIRECTING COMPLETION OF GAS SPHERE REPAIR WORK BY DIS'l'RICT.S' FORCE ACCOUNT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUN'l'Y SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE REPAIR OF TWO GAS SPHERES AT PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2, JOB NO. PW-036, TO BE COMPLETED BY DISTRICTS' FORCE ACCOUNT * * * * * * * * * * ·The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, do hereby determine that: WHEREAS, the Districts have published Notice Inviting Bids for REPAIR OF TWO GAS SPHERES ·AT.PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2; JOB NO. PW-036, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4755 of the State . Health and Safety Code, calling for bids on February 11, 1974, to be publicly opened and read; and, WHEREAS, no bids were received for said work; and, WHEREAS, the Chief Engineer has this day submitted a written recomm~ndation that said work be completed by Districts' force account. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: Section 1. That the recommendation of the Chief ~ngineer be .received and ordered filed; anQ, Section 2. That the Districts' s~aff is hereby directed to proceed with and complete Repair of Two Gas Spheres at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. PW-036, by Districts' force account. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 13, 1974. AGENDA rrEM #163. -V-ALL DISTRICTS l', o. !:ox ~n:."i -111,,.j.i LlJi~; ,\vr·nuc Fountai11 Valley, C:!liiorni~ ~J:708 JO j~: .ADD IT IO~S TO SEAL BE\O I EOULE\'Aiill PU\ ~r STAT I ON, CO~ffHACT NO. 3-12-1 ... .~ . $ 0. 00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the :: ~ ~ t :r J. ct an tl I :> r contra c. t ,,; or k ~11" c h c r l: h y nut ho r i :. c <l an cl :is co r:-1 pens~ t ion ~ :: h c r c for , t :-i c f o 1 J. ow in r: a <l d it ion s to or d c <l u ct ion s from th c contra c t .p !" i c c are :1ercby approvc<l. . .. Extension of Contract Time Due to delays in delivery of the specifi~d materials, the contract time is hereby.extended TOTAL TIME EXTENSION Summary of Contract Time Original Contract Date Original Contract Time · Original Completion Date Days Extended this Change Order Total Extension of Contra~t Time Revised Contract Time Re~ised to~pletion Date .· 38 Calendar Days 38 Calendar Days June 28, 1973 180 Calendar Days December 24, 1973 38 Calendar Days . 38 Ca~endar Days. 218 Calendar Days January 31, 1974 "-" Original Contract Price $ 112,568.00 Board authorization date£ February 13, 1974 By ____________ --:-----:-----,.,_..__.~~ Consulting Engineer B)' •. -·-----------~~---~~ Contractor AGENDA ·ITEM #72a •. Prcv. Auth. Changes $ 0. 00 . ---------------- This Change ~"IDUQ ~ $ 0. UO Ancnded Contract Price s 112,508.00 ·-VI- · Approved: COU!\T.Y SJ\NIT/\Tim~ DISTRICTS· of Orange County, California By_·---------------------------~-----C] 11 c-f L n [! i n cc ; DISTRICT 3 COUNTY SAN ITATION DISTRICTS . Cit ORANGE couNrv. C ftuFoR NIA P. 0. BO X 8 1 '27 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOU NTAIN VALLEY , CA LlfC:R N I "'-0 270 E February 6 , 1974 REPO RT OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON RECLAI MED WATER PRICING POLICIES (714) 540-29 10 (71 4) 962-24 I I The purpo s e of this report i s to present rec ommen dati ons concerning the sale of reclaimed· water for the future. Conclusion:3: The Committee be lieves that it would be in the best interest of the Districts to delegate the ~aie o~ reclaimed waste water to th e Orange County Water District rather than enter into separate agreeme~ts with each entity or individual, for the following reasons~ (1) To fully exploit the reuse potential, it will be necessary to construct a distribution system. (2) The Water District, by ut ilizing its Water Factory 21 capab i lities , could tailor the ·water quality t o meet the needs of its customers and eliminate the possibility of .being in competition with us for water reuse projects. (3) There would be greater public acceptance of reclaimed water from a water purveyor. (4) It eliminates further capital expenditures by the Sanitation Dist~icts to ·me.et the necessary regulatory agency requirements and allows the Districts to benefit ·financially from the reuse of waste wat~r. · (5) Minimizes the liability of the Sanitation Districts because they are not in the role of a water purveyor. (6) The Orang e County Water Di s trict is in the water busines s while the Sanitation Dist rict s are in the water pollution control business. Reco~x s ~da~:c ~s : 'I'he follo wing are the recommendations of the special committee t o the Joint Boar Q.s : (1) That the Joint Boards authorize the Committee to enter into negotiations with the Orange County Water District for the purpose of developing an agreement whereby the Sanitation Districts would supply up to 50 mgd of secondary treated water from its facilities at Plant No. 1 fo~ reclamation purposes and that the Wate r District, acting as the water pur- veyor, would ~ctively seek to contract with various entities and individuals for the sale of .the reclaimed water. The revenues to be sha~ed by both entities. (2) In addition to the above recommendat~on, immediate action should be taken by the Boards to promote the efforts of the Orange County Flood Control District and the City of Co;:;ta Mesa. The Committee recommends the following interim actions: ·(a) Authorize the ·staff to inform the Orange County Flood Control District that ~ pursuant to their request for up to .10,000 gallons per' day of e ffluent ·for their two- year pilot irriga tion program for landscaping .a section of the Santa Ana River levee, that the Districts supply the necess.ary raw secondary effluent free of charge and that all regulatory agency use permits be acquired by the Flood Control District. If the piiot program is successful, the .Flood Control District will be able to ~ontract with the Orange County Wate~ District for future ne~ds. (b) Encourage the City of Costa Mesa to proceed with its project to utili~e secondary treated waste water for golf course irrigation, and that the Distr~cts offer to supply secon- dary treated effluent in accordance with their request, at no charge, to July 1, 1976. Subsequent to July, 1976, the City can contract , with the Orange County Water District for its future water requirements . .., -.::.- _The Sanitation Districts have participated in· severa1. continuing water reuse programs. For eight years, our Districts provided primary treated water for irrigation in the Talbert Valley. This program was discontinued when the area was subdivided for residential development. We have continued to use treated wastewater for the landscaping on both Treatment Plant grounds with obvious success. · In 1962, the Districts invested $2 million in secondary treatment facilities at Plant No. 1 and adopted the policy to offer this processed water, without charge, to any public agency that would make use of it. The Orange County Water Di~trict accepted that offer and established a pilot facility on our property. For several ye~rs, the Water District conducted a research program toward the eventual establishment of a permanent water reclamation facility adjacent to our Plant No. 1 site. In ·1972, the Boards ~ntered into an agreement with the Orange County Water District ta provide 15 mgd of secondary treated water at no' charge un.til July, 1976, for use in the Water District's tertiary plant known as Water Factory 21. On or before July 1, 1976, the net value of the secondary treated .was~e water is to be evaluated and the agreement modified accordingly. Possibilities for Reuse of Secondary Treated Water. The staff has made a cursory study of the possible appli- cation of reclaimed water withiti a five-mile area of Plant No. 1. Their survey indicates that 32 mgd, including the 15 mgd req~ire ments of the Orange County Water Dist~ict for underground re~ charge, could be utilized ·for park, golf course, greenbelt and freeway landscaping projects. In addition to the current contractual arrangements with the Orange County Water District, we have ·received two requests f<5r information concerning the suitability of using effluent from our Treatment Plant No. 1. (1) The Orange ·County Flood Control District is considering the irrigation of the entire sec tion of the County's proposed .greenbelt along the Santa Ana River below the San Diego Fre eway ; the .require - ment ranges from 1.0 to 1.5 mgd for the main green- belt corridor. ' (2) The City of Costa Mesa has requested that it be permitted to take approximately 700 acre-feet per year of secondary treated effluent for a golf course. -3- For many y e ar s , t~e Distr i c ts ' Dir e c to rs and staff t :lve r eeogn i z ed tr:c.t t l1 ::·:1 c :..s a c cr.t :..:-:~i!"":.§; an-: g r o wing need for additi o nal sources of .useable , water in Orange County, and further reco g nize that one of the sources is the reuse of re- claimed water fr om sewage, most of which, at the present time, is being wasted to the ocean. However, there are water qu a lity problems and r e g ulatory ag_ency limitations \·rh ich presently pre- clude the wholesale use of secondar y trea t ed waste water as a replaceme nt for potab le water supplies. One of the major deterr e nts to water recl amat ion in Orange County is the high salt · content of the incoming waste water, the majority of which is the result o f the i~po r ta tion of Colorado River Water. The high sal~nity of our influent ma k es it impossible to meet th~ U. S. Public Health r ecomm endations without the construction and maintenance of expensive demineralization equipment. The pending importation of Northern California water presents a brighter picture for reclamation in the future because it is · relatively -low in salts. · The ~se of reclaimed water from sewage places a tremendous amount of respon s ibilit y o n the regulator y agencies, particularly the County and State Health Departments~ therefore, they have · cons~stently required extensive monitoring reports and have always recommended to the Regiona l Water Qual ity Control Board stringent requ ir ement s to protect the public h eal th~ These re- quir emen ts ~nd the associated continuous oonitoring of th~ quality of the effluent is very expensive and, in many cases, discourages the use of reclaimed · water because the applicant can purchase potable water for less cost than the ultimate cost of the reclaimed water even though it may be . "free". · D!·st~icts' Capability to Supply Secondary Treated Water. Currently the Districts have the capability of providing secondary treatment to 20 mgd at Treatment Plant .No. 1. This capability will be increased to 50 mgd at Plant No. 1 by the construction of an activated sludge treatment facility which should be completed in three years. These new facilities . will produce crystal clear ~ater, but will not reduce its high saline . content. In an effort to reduce the salinity of the incoming flows, the Districts have constructed a diversion structure to enable our operating personnel to be selective as .to which flows are treated at our Founta in Valley facilit y by diverting the high salirye flows to Plant No. 2 for treatment and disposal to the ocean. -4- -. Ex isting Te rtia ry Tre a t ment Facilities Own e d by Ot h e rs. The Orang e Co unty Wa t er Di s trict , wh o se primary r espo nsibility is to man ag e the underg r o und water su pp ly, is c omp l e ting the con- structio n of th e ir Wa t e r F a c tory 21, which i s a dj acent to our Dis t rict s ' Treatm.ent Plant No. 1. Th i s $22 million dollar f a c i lity , whic h inc l udes a d e salinizat i on c a pabil ity f or sea water, can provide tertiary treatment to at least 15 mgd of secondary treated water. Discussion. The Committe e held discussions with the staff on January 16th and February -4th. ·The · foliowing alternative approaches to the ·sale of reclaimed w~ter were .discussed: (1) Price any water utilized b y any entity or individual at a percentage of the going price for . potable water available to the applicant. (2) A ·Sliding pr~ce scale depending on the salinity of the water, again tied to the fluctuating price of available pot a ble water .. (3) Contract with the Orange County Water District with the role of our District to be that of a whole- saler to the Water District and with their r o le being the water purveyor wh ich would include the possible constructio n of a distributio n sys tem utilizing their adjacent -tertiary treatment capabilities with our Districts sharing equally in a1:ry revenues derived. Respectfully submitted, SPECIAL CO MMITTEE ON WATER PRICING 91 ~;; -I 'q~ · ---~-/.J..t.-t:<~;~_/l1.1/_~_, __ _ / " George Scott Ch a irman J o hn Store Don a ld Fox Ro b ert.Root Donald Saltarelli -5 - • • 't ,.. ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT f1Af'JTJ.. ANA, CALIF"ORNIA P, 0, BOX 1078 •;. G. OSBORNE CHIEF ENGINf:ER Tt:L.EPMO .. E: 834-2300 .lrlE.l CODE" 71C St.UTA ANA, CALIF"OR,..IA 92702 Di;C 12 1573 Mr. Fred Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts ot Orange County. Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Sir: rn.r: No. EOl .21 The· county Board of Supervisors has authorized the planning of a pilot program for landscaping a section of the Santa·Ana River levee.to determine the suit- ability of using effluent from your Plant No. 1 for irrigation of the entire section of the proposed greenbelt below the San Diego Freeway. The pilot study is expected to require less than 10,000 gallons per day of effluent. If the plant effluent is found to be satisfactory, the full ·project requirement will be in the range of 1.0 to 1.5 million gallons per day for the main greenbelt corridor encompassing the levees and longitudinally, adjacent areas. The proposed pilot study should be of general benefit in the evaluation of second- ary effluent as a source of water for irrigation. In view of this, we ask that you consider supplying raw secondary effluent free of charge, on demand in the required amounts, for a two-year pilot irrigation study. For pJrposes of planning the greenbelt development, information is needed on availability and price at your Plant No. ·1 of the· following.: 1. Raw wastewater (secondary effluent) 2. Chlorinated secondary effluent 3. Filtered and chlorinated secondary effluent 4. Laboratory tests expected to be requireq by regulatory agencies: a. Biochemical oxygen demand b. Specific conductance · c. Coliform bacteria d. Chlorine residuai Considering longer range implications, maximum use of reclaimed water appears to be in the public interest, Since it seems likely that you will have several :public agencies interested in utilizing effluent for irrigation, it would appear to be in the best interests of all concerned if the Sanitation Districts provide for distri- bution of effluent meeting requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board, so that a multiplicity of public treatment and monitoring facilities will not be required for its use. Your careful consideration of this request will be appreciated. Very truly yours, H. G. Osborne, Chief Engineer C. R. Engineer JR/RRE:am . cc: CRWQCB,SAR r .. CALIF'CRNIA 92E<~6 . P. 0. BOX 1200 FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER November 16, 1973 Mr. Fred A. Harper General ~!ahager County Sanitation Districts Pc 0. Box 812 7 · · · ~ountain·· Valley, California 92.?:08 .. Dear Fred: ... · In accordance with previous -discuisions and in follow up of my letter to you of February 9, 1973, we are now in a· position'to make a firm request for us~ of secondary treated effluent fro.m your Plant No .. 1 ope:ration. · .. ~ . In review, ··our Consultant, James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc., has prepared several. reports since 1971, showing the feasibility for using the secondary treated .e.ffluent as an irrigation water: source for the golf course. ·an July 20, 1973, the. City re.ceived the approval of. the Cal"ifornia Regional Water Control Board. Sitice that time additional effluent testini has taken place to confirm your ~bility to meet the · required quality standards. We are satisfied:that.the us~ ·of the reclaimed water would be beneficial to the City in .addition to conserving the existing domestic water supply of·the area.·. It is requested that the City be permitted to take .app·roximately 700 acre-feet per year. of reclaimed secondary treated water for reuse. I understand your next ·Board Meet~ng~ at which this mattei could be cotisidered, would be November 21: 1973. ·we would want a determination made as to the conditions and obligations of the parties .to an agreement for taking this effluent water. · If there are any questions or comments, please call at your convenience. FS:gae cc : City Cou n c i 1 DuWaync LjJkc Very tru~y jours, () !// . ,, .\' .· / I .., /! '. • -_1 · 61 ·1 ~I ,· , ~ .... /:. '_! ~..,,. j· ! .' . ;-/ ...... / 1~b .. 8on .. s. ADi\L TY ~1.c-\NAGER --~ ·.:, ----. --"P"""'\ ~ .. · -~--' ,t§ ;.-i .. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL VVATER RESEARCH PROJECT ' '--l 1100 GLENDON AVENUE LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90024 • (213) 478-0808 10 January 1974 \~L~T THE COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT ACC0~·1PLISHED I IN 1973 AFTER THE TH~EE-YEAR REPORT WAS ISSUED IN APRIL I Administrative and· Organizational. A new director took charge on July 1 and reorganized the staff into divisions. Engineers were added. The head~ quarters building ·was remodeled into effective laboratories. A research plan for the next fiscal year was drawn up and approved by the Consulting Board and Sponsors. Each scientific task was firmly outlined and budgeted. A new publications policy was established; 2 Progress Reports, 8 Technical Memoranda, and 10 scientific papers have been released. II Biological Findings Virtually all of the great backlog of biological data has been put on computer cards, programs have been written (and debugged) and analyzed for site groups. Patterns have emerged which correlate with the amount of organic material available and with areas of anaerobic conditions • . A synoptic survey of a substantial length of coast was made;. it furnished some new results (fish populations in un- polluted areas are often highest where dissolved oxygen is well below the state accepted standard) and confirmed some suspicions (the apparent changes in animal populations are as much a function of the sampling equipment used as of pollution). Monitoring equipment must be standardized. Furthermore, we have contributed significantly to reducing the errors in identification of fish between the various agencies of southern California--another factor which misled past investigators. We are l~arning about fish conununity structure with a view to greatly simplify monitoring pro- cedures. We believe we can see· some effects of DDT on the biota but ~e cannot correlate their reaction to excess metals, which suggests that metals may be a less serious problem than is generally believed. · -2- III Chemical Findings · Municipal wastewater is still the dominant source of DDT and PCB into the Bight although its volume has been greatly reduced in the last few years. Surface runoff and industrial discharges of DDT are only 10% of the municipal output. The output of DDT and PCB from the Point Loma plant is less than 0.001 mg/l which meets the new state requirements. The San Diego contribution of DDT and PCB to the Bight repre- sents only about 3% of the total input. The copper input, especially from anti-fouling paints wa_s found to be sub- stantial. The aerial fallout. of DDT~~v")dslJij:fle lowest on the . . (\. . coast but Ensenada, Mexico, was the highest. We have new techniques for measuring chlorinated hydrocarbons in seawater at the parts per trlllion level which means we can better trace the effects of this· c;ompound. We have improved the: techniques for using mussels as rapid-response test animals to monitor changes. in coastal waters. A mathematical model of the processes responsible for d~spersion of trace metals from a submarine outfall has been developed. IV Engineering '-"" Currents off various outfalls have been measured and analyzed with a view to reducing the amount of chlorine required. Automatic baited movie cameras have repeatedly photographed species of fish around outfalls not previously known to exist there. relevision equipment is in use to examine the bottom and the sea life. Models of the desorption of metals in oxygenated sediments have been made. Techniques are being developed that give promise of greatly reducing the cost of moni taring. . NOTE: Commissioner Lindsley Parsons is submitting this information to the Directors regarding the statµs of this project. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127. F O UNTAI N VALLEY. C A LIFORN I A 9270 8 10844 ELLI S A V ENUE (EUCL ID OFF·RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEW AY) F ebrua r y 7 , 1974 TO: .SPEC I AL COMM ITTEE ON FE ASIBILITY OF ELE CTRON I C DATA PROCESS I NG SYSTE M Ch arl e s St e v en s , Jr ., Ch a irman Don Mc i nnis Ro bert Root The meet ing o f the abov e comm i tt ee t o r ev iew t he finding s of t he c o nsulta nt has been confirm ed for 5 :30 p .m., We d n esd·c.y , F e bruar y 13th i mmediate l y preced i n g.the r egular J oin t Mee t i n g . A lig ht d i nn~r will be serve d . J WS :rb cc: Ro b e rt F . F i nne l l ne Sy lv e st e r Di rector of F inance TELEPH O NE S : AREA C ODE 714 540 -2 9 10 962-2411 -~ ,_ '- ~-. ., SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL V\/1\TER RESEARCH PROJECT 1100 GLENDON AVENUE LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90024 • (213) 478-0808 10 January 1974 WHAT THE COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT ACC0~·1PLISHED IN 1973 AFTER THE THREE-YEAR REPORT WAS ISSUED IN APRIL I Administrative and Organizational A new director· took charge on July 1 and reorganized the staff into divisions.· Engineers were ~dded. The head- quarters building was remodeled into effective laboratories. A research plan for the next fiscal year was drawn up and approved by the Consulting Board and Sponsors. Each scientific task was firmly· outlined and budgeted. A new publications.policy was established; 2 Progress Reports, 8 Technical Memoranda, and 10 scientific papers have been released~ II Biological Findings Virtually all of the great backlog of biological data has ·been put on computer cards, programs have been written (and debugged) and analyzed for .site groups. Patterns have emerged which correl~te with the amount of organic material available and with areas of anaerobic conditi9ns. A synoptic survey of a substantial length of coast was made; .it furnished some new results (fish populations in un- · polluted areas are often highest where dissolved oxygen is well below the stat~ accepted standard) and confirmed some suspicions (the apparent changes in animal populations are as much a function.of the sampling equipment used as of pollution). Monitoring equipment must be standardized. Furthermore, we have contributed significantly to reducing the errors in identification of fish between the various agencies of southern California--another factor which misled past investigators .. We are learning about fish community structure with a view to greatly simplify monitoring pro- cedures. We believe we can see some effects of DDT on the biota but we cannot correlate their reaction to excess metals, which suggests that metals may be a less serious problem than is generaily believed. -· -2- III Chemical Findings Municipal waste~ater is still the dominant source of DDT and PCB into the Bight although its volwne has been greatly reduced in the last few years. Surface runoff and industrial discharges of DDT are only 10% of the municipal output. The output of DDT and PCB from the Point Loma plant is less than 0.001 mg/l which meets the new state requirements. The San Diego contribution of DDT and.PCB to the Bight repre- sents only about 3% of the total input. The copper input, especially from anti-fouling paints wa_s fou.'1d to be sub- stantiai. The aerial fallout o.f DDT~.fcis~he lowest onw the coast but Ensenada, :Mexico, was the highest. We have new techniques for measuring chlorinated hydrocarbons in seawater at the pa·rts per trillion level which means we can better trace the effects of this compound. We have improved the techniques for using mussels as rapid-response test animals to monitor changes in coastal waters. A mathematical model of the processes responsible for dispersion of trace metals from a submarine outfall.has been developed. IV Engineering Currents off various outfalls have been measured and analyzed ~ · with a view to reducing the amount of chlorine required. Automatic baited movie cameras have repeatedly photographed species of fish around outfalls no~previously known to exist there. Television equipment is in use to examine the bottom and the sea life. Models of the desorption of· metals in oxygenated sediments have been made. Techniques are being developed that give promise of greatly reducing the cost of monitoring a NOTE: Commissioner Lindsley Parsons is submitting this information to the Directors r~garding the status of this project. .. Agenda ltem No.. .5 \ REGULAR JOINT MEETING FEBRUARY 13, 1974 COUNTY SANITATION D IST RICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FO UNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFO RNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, DISTRICT NO. 7 RE:· PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 39 The staff has been investigating the feasi bility of annexing approximately 446 acres to the District north of the Marine Corps Air Facility. This property is within the City of Tustin and ·currently in the Irvine Ranch Water District (I RWD) Improvement District No. 2. It is anticipated that the property wil l be de- veloped as follows: . 260 acres industrial 10 acres commercial 176 acres low to medium density residential .Pursuant to the instructions of the Board to determine the capacities ~vailable in the sewer system, a water height recorder was placed in the Browning Subtrunk Sewer north of the Navy Way . Pumping Station to record the present discharge from the area· within the District tributary to Browning Avenue .· The sewer .is running approximately 60% ·full. A check of the sewer connection permit s issued for this area indicates approximately 80% of the properties have been issued permits; however, it is not known how many of the properties are actually hooked up because the property owners were given the opportunity to secure permits pr"ior to the increase in connection fee schedules without being required to actually connect to the sewer. ·There are approxi- mately 30 undeveloped acres north of the Santa Ana Freeway.and east of Browning, wh i ch is outside the .District but has been Master Planned for sewer service through the Browning Subtrunk. As previously discussed, 6 ~gd capacity has ~een provided in the Red Hill se~er system for the Marine Corps Air Facility property, anticipating that sometime in the future, this mi litary base will be deactivated and the property developed for industrial purposes. I The staff and engineers have investigated the feasibility of sewering the 446 acres plus the area in the District now served by the Browning Subtrunk and Navy Way Pu mpin g Station b y means of a gravity sewer which would extend along a Flood Control .,. channel which crosses the Marine Corps Air Facility to Red Hill and Barranca. Because of the extremely flat grades and the depth of the District's Red Hill Trunk Sewer, a gravity se~er is not feasible, both from an engineering and cost .standpoint; there- fore, it appears that if ·District No. 7 is to serve the proposed area, a permanent pumping station ~nd force main should be con- structed to discharge directly into one of the District's Red Hill Trunks near the intersection of Red Hill and Moulton Parkway. Your staff has held discussions with management personnel of the Irvine Ranch Water District to determine the feasibility of detaching the existing residential area which covers 176 acres. We were advised that the Irvine Ranch Water District has sold a substantial number of bonds for the construction .of a trunk sewer and pumping station to serve this area and currently these properties are paying $0.53 per $100 a~sessed valuation on land only to ·pa~ off the bonds. In addition, each dwelling unit is charged $3.00 per month. It was suggested by IRWD that since the residential area . is within the City of Tustin, that to avoid confusion concerning who maintains the local collection system, the IRWD enter into an agreement ~ith District No. 7 which would provide that the local collector system be maintained by District No. T personnel on a cost plus 15% basis. '(NOTE: District No. 7 maintains the ·local . collection system within the City of Tustin through contractual arrangements ·with the 7th Sewer Maintenance District which is governed by the County Board of Supervisors). In view of the f.oregoing facts, the staff recommends that the proposed annexation be authorized subject to the proponent accepting one of the following alternatives: Alternate No. l _ (446 · Acre Annexation) (a) That the proponents pay the District's established annexation fee of $428 per acre for the entire 446 acres, including the 176 acres of residential area presently being served by the IRWC , and, (b) Detach the 446 acres from the IRWD, Impr6vement District No. 2, and seek relief of IRWD s e we r bond . obligations. That proponent construct a permanent pumping station and force main to dischar g e the flow from the entire acreag e into District No. 7's Red Hill Trunk syst e m in a ccordanc e ·with our District's require- ments and int e rc e pt th e pre sent flows going to the IRWD from the developed residential area, and, ( c) Annex the 44 6 acres to the. 7 0th' _Sewer Maintenance District. :...2- Alternate No. 2 (270 Acre Annexation) (a) Annex the undeveloped 270 acres, which are zoned industrial and commercial, to District No. 7 and pay the District's established annexation fee of $428 per acre for the 270 acres, and, (b) Detach the 270 acres from the Irvine Ranch Water District, Improvement District No. 2, and, ( c) That the proponents construct. a permanent pumping station and force main in accordance· with District No. 7's requirements to serve the needs of the undeveloped 270 acres of property for dis- charge directly into ·the Red Hill Sewer system, and, (d) Annex the 270 acres to the 70th Sewer Main- tenance District to pay for the operation and maintenance of the collector facilities and pumping station and fore~ main, and, (e). District No. 7 enter into a contractual arrange- ment with the IRWD to operate and maintain the local sewer collector system within the 176 acre residential area so that service is being provided by the same ~ntity within the City of Tustin. Fred A. Harper General Manager January 17, 1974 Board of Directors County Sanitation District #7 of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Attn: Mr. Fred A. Harpe~ General Manager Re: Irvine Industrial Complex -Tustin· Gentlemen: Industrial ~ Complex t="lL=:D l:i •.h~ r;c·1~-. .-f -.,~ s~"'. .. -·~"3r/ Count'/ S:1r:1~:?<:ion L..o . .::.:r:ct No 7 . \. i --: ; .. -,·-i \..' '.' L.-v . The Irvine Industrial Complex respect)vely requjsts the Board of Directors consider the annexation of approximately 446 acres into Sanitation District #7. The total subject area is now in Irvine Ranch Water District·-Improvement District #2 and will necessitate detachment in conjunction with the annexation proceedings. · The following is a list of the land uses with related net acreage and average flow for each use: 2. 3. Industrial 260 Acres @ 3880 G.P.D./acre Commercial -10 acres @ 3230 G.P.D./acre Low to medium density residential - 176 acres @ 1990 G.P.D./acre TOTAL FLOW · = - 1 , oo a , 8·o o G • P • o • 32,300 G.P.D. 350 2240 G.P.D. 1 , 391 , 340 G ·• P . D. It is vitally important to the Complex to have the subject area in Sanrtation District #7 in that the existing sewering agency, IRWD, is unable to take industrial waste. Maps indicating the location of the project is attached· for your reference. Very truly yours, • ~~/.I'~ HI lHAEL J. fABB I TT Manager of Engineering cc R. ~toyer, IRWD Williamson & Schmid 2122 Campus Drive I Box 4404 •Irvine. California 92664 • (714) 833-1010 Br an Ave Mitchell Ave · atnut Ave Santa Ana Marine Corp Air Station : lIIIIIII1J1 .Z:.,DU.17~1'9~ . • Ci:JHH.E'A!!.t:I_,·,_ • ISS.\1 ~.J'l~r~ I : I LOCATION .MAP IRVINE .. > c 5 INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX .Owen Mena rd & Associates Report of the Jo i nt Chairman February 13, 1 974 Ca ll meeting o f the Executive Committee f o r 5 :30 p .m . Tuesday, February 26 , 1974 . Invite Direct o rs Qu igley and Winn, or Director ~nd CiiV r~ c/,)/ r ~ (.,, ? ~Pt!? I . / · tc /)__--/7 . /( 1,9-" (. c_ . r-~~I . At 8:00 p.m ., if the Boards are in regular session , move to Agenda Item No. 67 and ask if there is anyone p resent who is here for the public hearing. If there a re none , or only a few, announce that this item wil l be taken up in its regular sequence. 11 . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 El,..LIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) Joint Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts NOSo 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California "B'e bruary 7, .197 4 Subject: Summary Financial.Report for Six-Months Ended December 31,.1973 . . TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 Transmitted herewith is the regular quarterly financial report for the six months ended December 31, 1973, prepared pursuant to the. Boards' policy directive of June 14, 1972. The statements summarize the fiscal .activities of the joint operations and the individuai Districts for the first half of the 1973-74 fiscal year, and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The combined 1973-74 budget for all Districts is approximately $72 million,_ of which 83% is for capital expenditures for facilities improvements and · extensionso · Of the balance, approximately 5% is for debt service, 8% for District operations and maintenance, and 4% for the r~spective District's share of joint operationso Incl~ded in each District's statement is a sum:r:1ary of the major income and expense categories and an itemization of their trunk sewer construction projects and respective share of the joint works expansion. Separate staff reports on indiyidual construction projects are included each month with the agenda material for the Joint Board meeti:ig. Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. The statements are presented on an accrual basis and, therefore, inter-district transact~ons for fiscal '73-74 which were accrued in.1972-73 are not reflected in the year-to-date balanceso If you have ·any questions concerning the material, I would be pleased to discuss them with you at your co11.venience o · CASH AND INVESTMENTS Earned interest of approximately $1,470,000· from our continuing program of investing reserve funds (primariJ,.y capital funds accumulated for construction of required sewerage facilities) has accrued during the first six months of fiscal 1973-740 This is more than double the interest earnings for the same period last year, primarily because of increased construction funds accumulated for our required expansion·program and a substantial increase in interest ·rates over the past year. As of December 31st, 96% of the Districts' cash funds were invested in short-term government securities-as shown below. The cash on hand includes $1.17 million returned from investments to provide funds for Districts Nos. 2, 3, and 11 1958 bond redemp- tions due January 1, 19740 The balance of cash on hand was earning interest in comingled i.nvestments with the County Treasurer 1 s Office o Cash on Hand Investments in Gov't Securities Total (All Districts) Amount $ 1,727,218 41,273,925 $43,001,143 Percent JOINT OPERATING FUND This fund accounts for the operation, maintenance, and administrative activities relative to the Districts' jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities. Salaries & Wages and Benefits -Bec~use of unfilled positions, payroll expenditures will be maintained well below the anticipated budget levelo Gasoline, Oilf and Fuel -As the Directors are aware, significant fuel cost increases are being rea izedo Because of the price increases, it is anticipated that a budget transfer will be necessary before the end of the accounting year. The Districts' cooperative purchasing arrangement for gasoline and diesel fuel with the County of Orange has been superseded by the Federal petroleum allocation and price regulations. Under the regulations, sanitation services receive priority allocationso The Bo·ard has awarded a contract to increase our storage capacity, which allows us to receive full tanker deliveries. · Insurance -Amount reflects net expense after charge backs to in.di victual Districts for their respective share of the insurance overhead related to job costing. Chlorine and Odor Control Chemicals -Primarily for odor control at treatment plant siteso 0 Chemical CoEfulants -The staff has been able to temporarily change the mode of operation w ch has precluded the necessity of expending these funds and yet enable the Districts to meet the current enforced discharge reg~ations. Professional Services -EDP study and ~ecommendation anticipated at March Board meetingo Boards will consider proposal for purchasing and warehousing study at February Joint meetingo Research and Monitoring -Annual share of participation in Southern California Coastal· Water R~search ProJect has been paid, and expense to date includes estimated first- half allocations of said payment. Utilities -Major item in the utilities expense account is for purchased electrical power. Districts have experienced an 80% increase in electrical costs over the same period for last fiscal yearo Approximately 20% of this is a result of increased demand as fl·ows increase and new facilities are placed into service o It is our understanding that the PUC has recently approved further utility rate increaseso It is anticipated that a budget transfer will be necessary for this account prior to the close of the fiscal period. Prior Year's Expense -This account represents adjustments to an operating or non- operating account balance of a prior year. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND This fund accounts for the costs of expanding and improving the Districts' presently-owned treatment and disposal facilities and represents an average of .30% of each individual District's budget requirements for 1973-740 During the first six· months $2.3 million was. expended on joint works treatment and disposal facilities expansion. Districts are nearing completion on several major construction contracts and several minor projects. During this period, design was completed on the $29 million 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, and it is anticipated that bids will be received during the last quarter of the fiscal year. The share of joint works expansion costs are reflected in the financial statements of the respective Districts. INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS -The statements reflect the accounting transactions for the seven Districts and include each respective District's share of the Joint Operating Fund and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fundo Truces -Approximately 47% of the 1973-74 secured true levy of $15.3 million has been allocated through December, 1973. Federal and State Construction Grants -Summarized·below is the amount of Federal and State Construction Grant funas received during the period. Presently, State and Federal agencies will fund 87-1/2% of "approve~" treatment plant projects. 1970-71 Joint Works Projects -$1,875,800 representing 20% of grant 1972-72 Joint Works Projects -$2,156,500 representing 45% of grant I " Connection Fees -Districts Nos. 5 and 7 have had connection charges for several years. Connection fees became effective in Districts Nos. 2 and 3 on October 1, 1973. Collections through December are reflected under this account in the respective Districts' financial statements. Twelve of the nineteen cities in Districts 2 and 3 have remitted fees collected during the first quarter of the agreement. Our Industrial and Permit Division is contacting the staffs of the remaining cities regarding the status of connection fees collected within their respective cities. Other Revenue -Except as footrroted, consists .primarily· of interest income, various fees, and sale of capacity rights. District Construction -Represents expenditures on Districts' Master Plan construction program of trunk sewers. The average 1973-74 budget for this item is 53% for the seven Districts. However, this average is influ~nced by the major programs of District~ 2 and 3. Itemization of each project is included on the lower portion of each finan- cial statement. Share of· Joint Works Construction -Represents Districts' share of joint treatment and disposal f'acilities expansion. Discussed above under Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. Bond Retirement and Interest Expense -Payment of principal and interest on outstanding general obligation bonds 0£ the respective Districts. .Annual expense for all Districts is approximately $2.3 million. · Share of Joint Operating -Represents Districts' share of operating and maintaining Jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities, and administrative activit~es. Costs are distributed based upon each District's respective gallonage flow (see Joint Operating Fund statement ·for details). District Operat1ng and Other Expenditures -Consists primarily of individual Districts' general operating expenses and operation~ maintenance, and repair of the respective Districts' collection systems. As commented on under the Joint Operating Fund, we are experiencing increased costs in the Districts' utilities accounts and anticipate that budget transfers may be necessary later in the year. Further info.rmation will be available at the time of preparation of the third quarter report. JWS:lk J. Wayne 3ylvester Director of Finance COUNTY S/\N I TAT"I ON DISTRICTS OF onAMGE COUfffY SUVii·~ARY JOii!T OPER.ATifJG EUDEET REVIEW SIX l ~OTJTHS EEDED 12/31/73 S.4LAR.TES,, Ti·~1GFS & BENEFITS Salaries & Wages Employee Benefits Sub-total Payroll _ Less: Chargebacks to Dists & CORF Net Joint Operating Payroll MATERil.LS, SUPPLIES & SERVICES Gasoline, Oil ·& Fuel Insurance Offi·ce Expense Operating Expense Chlorine & Odor Control Chemicals Chemical.Coagulants . Other Operating Supplies Contractual Services Professional Services Printing & Publications Rents & Le2ses--Equipment Repairs & Maintenance Research & N~nitoring ~ravel, Meeting & Train~ng Other Expenses Prior .Years Expenses BUDGET lq73-74 2,217,201 . 364, 330 c,:Jol,:J51 790,000 1,791,531 25,000 27,000 ·16;000 75,<JOO 118,ooo 74;800 38,000 46,ooo 18,ooo 12,000 177,000 194,ooo 12,500 342,500 4,750 40,900 Total Material & Supplies TOTAL JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE Lesn: Revenues .1,220,55~ NET JOINT.OPERATING EXPENSE . GALLOilAGE CH/J.RGES 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 FLOW IN MILLION GALS 3, 352 MG ·8,609 9' 040. 1,601 1,697 1,922 ? 020 3,012,081 200,000 2,812_~081 'YEAR TO DATE 977,740 155.820 1, 133, :-.iuU 449,848 683,712 12,667 25,431 6,050. 30,226 26,998 8,428 16,114 8,520 7,715 63,321 49,963 . 7' 225 161;480 2,203 6,682 433,023 l,ll~,735 69,bo7 1.047,128 GALLONAGE CHP.RGE 124,286 319,208 335,188 59,362 62,922 71,264 74,898 -, -I , '7 1 ,-, C _+,l ·,·~-~ REMAINING J3UDG:ST 1,239,461 208,510 1, 4i+'l, 971 340,152 1,107,819 12,333 1,569 w 9' 950 .. 44,774 118,ooo 47,802 29,572 29,886 9,480 4,285 113,679 144,037 5,275 181,020 2,547 . 33, 318 787,52~ 1,895,346 130,393 l,764,g~3 . COUNTY SArll TAT I ON DISTRICT NO. i SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT De c>~~mbe r 31, l '.:f( ~ BUDGET REVIEW Remaining 1973-74 Budget Year to Date Bud.~et Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st· REVEllLES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Connection Fees Other Reverlues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reser~es Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures .... Ending Fund Balances, December 31, · 1973 1,119,617 569;300 199,763 500,000 3,119,053 97,038 334,422 171,418 FACILITIES EXPANSION ·. ·. CONSTRUCTION IN PFOGRESS: 3unr·lo\·:er ·Interceptor Lit iga ti on S.ha re of Joint ~"ork...; Expansion COHPLETED PPOFEFTYl PLAllT & EQUIE~!2l!T: Land a~d Property Righ~s Collection Lines and Pu::1p Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal F2cilities General Plant and Adainistrative Facilities ~quity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipnent .· Balance 6-30-73 433,889 433,8G9 . 21,657 4,238,544 i1' ~~·93 16,073 ;.;::, (16-C:-, cc ...... ) _,._,'-' _,;,.)_)._ 9 7p,r-7( -=<O~ ' ! -_, , ~ , -::J -~· 2,737,771 539 344 29s;s99 123,760 3,699,574 13 223,628 83,252 124,286 18,235 449,414 3,250,160 1973-74 Additions . 13 223,628 223,641 :~80,273 270,cCl . 4~9' 987 2,89),42:) 13,786 210,136 ·1c:..:_3 ., <'·3 _, '..L,:) Balance i2:.:.31-73 .· 13. b~·T, jl'T · 11,:::93 a 707. --=-(~·1~ . ~.. / ~ _,., ---~ - .• COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINAflCIAL REPORT December 31, 1973 BUDGET REVIEW .. '-' Remaining 1973-74 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVE,~lUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Connection Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances. EXPENDITURES: Discrict Construction & Reserves Joint Works Constructiori & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses ~is~rict Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund B~:ances, December 31, 1973 4,871,762 1,787,700 975,000 5,666_,.283 17,697,250 5,783,726 589,507 862, 817, 1,210,295 :FACILITIES EXFANSIOU CONSTRUCTION IN PF.OGRESS:·· 1 ,' Santa .[A.na .::· i ver Interceptor, r=\eacl-, Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reh 2 Design Stage of Other Projects Design Share of Joint Works Expansion COftPLETED PRQ_PERTY, PDANT & FOUIP.'.!EilT: Land and Froper-cy fl.2-gl~t s Collection Lines and Pur.1p Staticns Treatment F&cilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment ?acilities Total Property Plant & Equipm~nt Balance· 6-30-73 3, 734·, 203 127,858 :41~155 3,903,216: 1,361,854 5,265,070 212,246 12,243,082 . 1, 186 33,172 28,616 l?,299,584 33,622,956 12,911,530 2, 345' 205_ 937,532 136,719 1,731,289 18,062,27i::; 3,934,989 D 702,680 142,082 319,20.8 36,926 :221352885 122226232Q 1973-74 Additions 3,829,762 5,007 100,220 3,934,989 702,680 4,637,669 4' 637 _~ 669 2,526,557 850,168 838:281 3' 93'-~' 994 13,762,261 5,081,046 447,425 ·543,609 l,173,3b9 ·. Balance 12-~l-7~ 7 i:;:6~ 06.~ '_, ~' :;1 j 132,865 141._, 375 7,838,205 2,064,534 9,902,739 212,246 12,243~022 1,1 1=?6 . 33,172. 28,616 15' 899' :-::.s'-' COUNTY SAllITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINArlCIAL REPORT December 31, 1973 BUDGET REVIEW Remaining 1973-74 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Connection Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning aalances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, December 31, 1973 6,245,041 1,941,700 1,800,000 1, 603., 387 15,b28,ooo 5' 436' 422· 827,184 899,051 792,658 ·FACILITIES EXPANSION CONST.RUCTION IN PF.OGRESS:· ;:; na re o I' !\no -c t .L n t e r c e p tor , R c l-: s i & 2 Kpott !nterceptor, F\eaci; 3 Knott Int2rc2ptor, ?.eacr-_ 4 Bolsa ?2li2f Trunk Knott Interceptor Crossing Other Frojects · Sha.re of Joint ~·:orks Expansion Cm.:.'PLETED PPO?EFi.'TY. Pf.ANT & FCUIP:'-El.1T: Land and Proper~y Ri~hts Collection Lines and Fump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal F2cilities General Flant and Administrative Facilities ~quity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance· 6-30-73 2,472,474 1,123,828 ).39,211 161,274· 61,166 6,880 3,964,833 1,479,085 236,105 17,750,732 : 15 ,p36 28,419 27,092 17,2f.R,?48 4o, 769, ~:.o 12,917,828 2,984,422 1,018,236- 22, 708 553,630 17_,496,824 2,488,320 763,285 180,957 335,188 59,489 3:827,£32.._ ... 13,669_.,~ 1973-74 Additions 32,225 ·1,974,626 357,501 12,973 34 . 110' 961 2, 488' 320 .. 763,285 3,251,605 3,260,619 0-:-3 4r:,4- .-I '-' \., .1,777,292 l.!'049, 7r:_7 12,539,680 4,673,137 646,227 .563, 893 73S,lo9 Balance 12.!.~l-73 2,;04.,699 3 09~ }: .:'t ' \.,' .,.. _..,4- 496,712 174·~ 247 C.1,200 lJ_ 7' .84l 6,453,153 2,242,370 236,105 17,750,73~ 15,030. 28,419 27,092 17 :°"',~ q '"'l..L.q ' ~. -• c .. 44 .• 0 21, 1 .· :_: COUNTY SArl I TAT I ON DISTRICT NO I 5 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINMlCIAL REPORT Decemb2r 31, 1973 BUDGET REVIEW Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and Sta~e Construction Grants Connection Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures .. Ending Fund Balances, December 31, 1973 · 1973-74 Budget 825,327 368,200 250,000 91,814 541,897 1,384,021 :ao,o4o 148,122 587,537 FACILITIES EXPANSION COllBTRUCTION IN PF.OGRESS: Share of Coast i:frry .r'orce r.:ain, Pro,j Bayside Dr. Trunk Sewer Relocation Other Projects Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROP!-'RTY, PLANT & EQUIP.'·!ENT: Land and ~r:)pcr-cy i-\ic;hi: s Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal F~ciliti2s General Plant and Administrative Facilities 5-19 Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-73 698,878 j.528 "'676 705,082 280~276 985,358 6,231 2,178,148 .·7' 347 7,~15 8,946 3;272,210 6,465,3i;5 Year to Date 1.s225,770 399,855 192,949 43,.194 £;3 84~ 1,920 .. 611 86,523 144,895 24,935 59,362 94; 231·· 409,946 1,510,665 1973-74 Additions 72, 491 ·· 14,ooo 32 86,523 J.44,895 231,418 148,327 379,745 .. ~ Remaini'ng Budget 425,472 175,2'.:)l 206,806 32' 9;-r1 .· .· 4/r:; j_,;7· 4 _, _./' 1,239,126 5,105 88,760 403 "'06 -· ' :) Balance 12-31-73· 771 ~6g ':) -19,528 708 .. 791;605 4-25,171 1,216,776 6,231 fl ~00{~· }17~: c.' -le;_ ''I ... · 7,347 7,115 8' 9 1+6. 3' 272, 210 '-' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 SUMMA.RY QUARTERLY FI NAMC I AL REPORT December 31, 1973 BUDGET REVIEW Remaining 1973-74 Budge~ Year to Date Bud(!'.et Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVEllUE8: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Connection Fees · Other Revenues Total Revenue· & Beginning Balances EXPENDI':IURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirenent and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, December 31; 1973 519,396 348,700 122,801 251,000 1,553,082 37,079 169,852 236,125 FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION Ill PP.OGRESS: Share of Coast Hwy Force ~,Iain, Proj 5-19 Other Projects Share of Joint Works Expansion CQ/.PLETED PRO~Eh.TY, PI.ANT & FQUIP,\,'ENT: Land and Froper~y Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal F2cilities General Fl2nt and Administrative Facilities ~quity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-73 94,392 2,983 97_,375 . 265.,005· 362,380 562 524,213 .2,653 7,j94 23_,743 3,093,916 4,014,861 1,422,681 247,318 182,435 83,737 l,_936' 171 l0,780 137,682 30,912 62,922 21, 393. 263,689 1,672,482 1973-74 Additions 3;642· 7,138 l0,780 137,682 148, 462 148,462 272 0'(8. . -' -166,265 39,0_64 . 240, 220 1,415,400 6,167 106,930 214,732 Balance 12~3J~73 98, 034· 10,121 108,155 402,687 510,842 562 524,213 2,6,3 7,394 23,743 3,093,916 ____ ___.._ 4,163,323 COUNTY SAflITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FHIM!C IAL REPORT .Cece:r~ber 31, l~/T3 BUDGET REVISW Remaining 1973-74 Budget Year to· Date Bud~:et Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Connection Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reser~es Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditure~ Ending Fund Balances, December 31, 1973· 1,826,211 462,600 230,000 281~020 1,962,114 2,180,693 598,035 193,625 624,246 FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: W~st Relief ~runk, ?reject 7-5-lR Sunflower Interceptor Litigation Other Pro.j ects Share of Joint Works Expansion COi\fPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & FOUIP!.fEilT: Land and .Propert;y ~\iz:;ht s Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Fa~ilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-73 52.1, 239 -2,056 523,295 35~,693 874,988 217,751 15,403,613 lo ,.-.Q.? , (1u ..... 8,082 4,105_,994 20,621,210 23l,337 242,113 l ~c 6ll7 _,._., ' 20~.122 4,562.,093 32,692 182,497 304, 274 72.,264 i4c, 514 .· 737,241 3,82~,852 1973-74 Additions i:,308 30 14,354 32,692 182,497 215,189 9l+4 ~ 874 220. 487" 91.3_;3 . 72 ~.898 1,929;422 1,998,196 293,761 122 .. 361 477;732 Ba:)..ance 12-~}.-71 -..-,9 ... ,,,..... ~~ ':: _;: ( 30 16,410 ::_;:_35·, 987 534,190 1,090,177 217,751 15,403,tl3 10,732 r. 08,-. 0' ( 4_.10_ .en~ . COUNTY SArlITATION DISTRICT NO. i1 SUMMARY QUARTERLY F HlAMC I AL REPORT December 31, 1973 BUDGET REVIEW Remaining 1973-74 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st· REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Connection Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, December 31, 1973 1,091,413 421,800 317., 112 1,245,000 2, 447' 003· 100,255 204,192 167,350 ·FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PF.OGRESS:· Share of Knott Ln~erceptor, Re~ 1 -& 2 Design· .stage of Slater Ave., ~Tunk & Wet Well Eehabilitation Share of Joint Works Expansion CO/.fPLETED PPOFERTY, PLANT & EQUIE'.fE?lT: Land and ?roper~y hights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities ~quity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipnent Balance· 6-30-73 392,502 314 392,816 319,802 712,618 16,936 2,885,831 3,'Q53 17,116 3,733,675 7~369.-229 526' 938. 220,159 139,643 _3,850,243 5,961 167,373 31,082 74,898 66,761 346,075 3,504,168 1973-74 Additions 5,115 846 5,961 167,373 173,334 173,334 ~~:64' 475 201,641. 177,469 1,2:39,039 2,279,630 69,173 129,294 100,589 Balance· .....1..2;: ~1-73 397., 61.7 1,160 398., 777 487,175 88.5,952 16,936 2,885,831 17~116 3~733,675 7 ~ -=42' :.~63 2/13 AGENDA MAILING MAIL EIR 's TO: DISTRICT 2 (Chairman Nevil to get all copies) Yorba Linda Bump Station & Face Main (Fullerton -Root) Kraemer Blvd . Interceptor (Placentia -Finn e ll) Palm Drive Interceptor (Placentia -Finn el l ) (Anaheim -Stephenson ) Carbon Canyon Interceptor (Anaheim -Stephenson ) DISTRICT 3 (Chairman Fox) Imperial Relief Interceptor (La Habra -Nevil ) (Fullerton -Root ) (Brea -Fox) ~1 ~~~~~ ~-~ ~- ~~ .... ~~ Q~-~~ ~~~ ¥~~~ ~~~ C OUNTY S ANITATION D ISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.o. aox a121 108 44 ELLI S AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 549-791 0 (714) 962-:£411 Feb ruary 5, 1974 M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: Ray E. Lewis FROM : J. Wayne Sylvester We need the followi ng documents by noon Wednesday in order to complete the agenda on schedule for mailing on Thursday: ALL DISTRICTS ALL DISTRICTS ~L DI STR I CTS ALL DISTRICTS DISTRICT 7 DISTRICT 7 z t. DISTRICT 7 DI STRICT 2 2 3 .-1. DISTRICT 3 DISTRICT 3 DI STR I CT 3 -~ge Order No . 1 to Resources Management Center, Pw -032 -~imum cost figure for i mplementing Resources Management Center recommendations ~3 (, s&<:> -Eng i neer:s proposal re additional pumping capacity at ocean outfal l booster stations -t...&t'aff progress·· report on Treatment Plant Construction -~o re Ma ster Plan Reimbursement Agreement on Contract 7-2D-7 -'Jr_7-1imi nary· engineering report re Tustin-Orange Sewer -efid Tab and ~mmendation for Diversion Structures , 7-3A -l, 7-3A -2, 7 -3B-1 & 7 -3E -l - -~ironmenta7 °Impact Reports fo r Contracts 2 -15 , 2 -16~ 2-17 & 2-18 -L.£-t'aff progress reports on 2-14-1 and 2-14-2 . -Env i ronmental Impact Reports for Imperial Re l ief ~ri t erceptor , Contract 3 -19 -vFroposal from Boyle Enginee~ing r e Knott Interceptor , Reaches 5 -8 , Contract 3 -20 -~ters from Sypress and Stanton re approving rout i ng o f Knott Interceptor, Contr act 3 -20 -~aff pr ogress reports on 3-17 and 3-18 MEET ifl G DATE -1.'.~b . 1 3 , 1974 T!ME 7 :..30 p .m DIST R ICTS 1,2,3,5 ,6 ,7 & 1 1 DIST R;cr .. 1 /if. •J 'l\iJ'P Jriqi"-~-'l\f< ·s g.-i.~o/-> yv"'l) II V1 I -··· \LJ -·-----. / (G ART-~·~) ..•.. F'ATT€RSl?I'./ .••• _:!_ _j_ ~-· ~ U'.f\~G ~::R ) ....•• FIN NELL: •• .,. ___ _ . ( CU\i..!< ) ..•. :B,'\.r,· rn ..... ~. ~ _j_. ±__ rJ..... :::u~..Rl( ) •...• EAl<E:R ....... / . RI MA ••.•..••• --T-~ _r;._ ) C Ui.R K) ) ••••• B~\ TT HJ. •••.• __ _J :== (WELS H ..•.... SA LT tRE LLI .•. --_j_ ~ \SA L5:S .•••.•• Bi..AC !<r~A N •••• _:!_ __ DIST RIC T 2 (EWIN G) ....... CH AP UT.::::: ./ ==:· ( ) J (~~~:::;;::::~~~~~~~:::::: ==~= _ __i__'fi-~-'-?~i~~~~i::::::~~~i!~~:::::-~-· --. F8xS ' ..... 1(b\./ LS Ki ..... -;-_j_ ~ 1<0 ~/A L SKI ) •••. FOX: .•••••.• -.1--P~TTE ~S ONi ::G A;,9 HE .. ::::: ==.;= _i_ + ~~i~~~}c N ) ... ~~~~~E.; .... ==~= === SCOTT ...... ~~~~v:::::::: ==:= ,j .J-~~~fj~))::.::::~~ii~N:::::::_/_ -_-_-- m~m;~::: :m~~~~~6~::: ==;= -~-,. ~ ~g~j:~:::::: :~g~r~~~i::: :==~= ===· (DUNNE) • : : : : : WINN •••••• : :~~,t_L_----,;-+-. MC INN Is) .... ~x~~~OTT: : : :==~= ==·= DISTRICT 3 ~CROUL) ••••••• MC INNIS .... -/--- STEVEN$) •••• ~N EVIL ••••••• ---::--== ·(KOWALS KJ) ••• FO X .......... -.)-_'{_...'....._ GARTHE) •••••• PATTERSON ••• ,/ (CLARK ) •••• BATTIN ••••••• _.; __ _i_ ±__ PERRY •••••••. -~--- (SALES) •••••• BLACKMAN ••••• _.1 _ _L --=. PORTER •••••• -a;--- .(HINES) •••••• DAVIS •••••••• _/ _ __j_ __:::: (BURTON) •••••• QUIGLEY ••••• -C::--- . EDWARDS •••••• -"-_j_ __ -RI MA •••••••• --;::--- ~PATTERSON) •• GARTHE •• ').'·;,,·. ./ _'/_ .±__ !FRANKIEWJCH) .ROBERTS •••••. .; ·== MATNEY) ••••• GREEN.; •• w-.. --r _'f_ .:::.__ MC INNIS)~ ••• ROGERS...... ./ BROWN) •••••• HYDE •••• ,. ~ ••• _J __ . _'{_ ---::=-· RE I NHARDT J.;. ROOT •••••••• --;--- . MARSHOTT ••••• _v_. __::J_ _+_ · SALTARELLI-. .-v--- . PE RR Y •••••••• ~ __L .±.__. HOLLINDEN) ••• SCOTT........ ./ == (FPA.NKI EW I CH) ROBERTS •••••• _../ _ _Jj[_ ___:::. . PEREZ) 1 •••••. SMITH. • • • • • • ../ !f NHARDT) •• ROOT ••••••••• ../ 'I -DUTTONJ~··.···STEPH~NSON •• I == HOLL I ND EN) •• SCOTT........ ./ ---Y + . ROBE~TS J ~ •••• STEVENS ••••• __!':__ __ DUTTO N) ••••• STEPHENSON.~.~.~ j:__ f{£ INN~SJ •••• STORE ••••••• _./ __ _ R~BE RT$) .•.• STEVENS •••••• 7-_j_ _..ft::__ f r~ ....... WESTRA · . • ./ · /""'c.. J ••••• WESTRA ••• __ -:f---=. . DUNNE) ....... WINN........ ./ === DISTRICT 5 . r"\ . (CROUL) •••• •.Mc INNIS ••••• _.;_ LJL·\_+_ L ~t-~ (BAKER) ...... CLARK ...... _./_ µ, 1±._ KYMLA •••••••• _..;_ Q-)..±_ OTHERS DIST.RI.CT 6 ~ . . · PORTER } •••••• ~~£__ r '(~lWJ (-l...... (CLARK ) •••• E-A.T-T...-I~N .~~~:'. ___;{__ ~ _+_ j ~ ~ q· ~ (MC INNIS) ••• S TORE •••••••• _L_ -.-L ...±.._ I .f ( ,) . DISTRICT 7 . vi ,, . ! PEREZ)···· • ·SM ! TH··· • • • • • --...,-1-_-+_ ) • • • • CL ~.RK • • • • • • • • -· -1 -~ _-\-_ j GAR T HE)· ····PATT ERSON ···· ~ --:f--...::::.__ PO RTE R······· --__f&._ ~ (BURTO N) .•... QU I GLEY •..••. '/ ~ .±:__ (MC I NNIS) ••• ROGERS •••.••• -1--T _.+_ (V .S rl) •••••• SA LTARE LLI···--~--=-. DI STRIC T il (M ATNEY) ••• · • DUKE · • ~ • • • • _L _L .±_ (1_. ~CLA R K ) ••• ·B1-\KER ·. • • · • · • ~ _j_ _::___ ,MAT NEY ) •...• GI BBS · • . • • • · • --· _::£__ ~ DI STRIC T 8 MITCHELL· • • · · ------( ) ..••.. CLARK · ••..• __ ---- HOLM· • • • • • • • • ------· 2/13 /ll! HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS DUNN CLARKE TAYL OR BRO WN NISSON BLISS BOETT NER CA RLSON FINSTER ~Y HOHE NER HOWARD HU NT KE ITH KENNEY LY NCH MADDO X MA RTI NSON P I ERSA LL S TE:VEN S v --· .-JL_ / ~ v. ~ -:r -r MEETING DATE Feb . 1 3 , 1 974 TIME 7 :30 p .m . DISTRICTS l ,2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ,7 & l l DISTRICT 1 ~'1 ~,,.\.u .. ) ·(GARTHE) ••••• PATTERSON •••• ~ _+ __ -+_ ( CL ARK ) .... B .~TT IN •••... -. ~ _±___ _+_ · R I MA • • • • • • • • • a_.,. a... _g__ (~/ELSH ••••••• SALTARELLI ••• ~ ...:r__ __:::_ DISTRICT 2 (r -vENS) •••• NEVIL •••••••• ~..±..,___;..±___ (E?r! NG) .••••• CHP.PUT ••••••• ~ _-+_ --=.... \ ) •••• CLARK. • • • • • • • V---..I.._ _-T_ ~LANGER) ••••• FINNELL •••••• ~ _t _ ..±__ FOX) •••••••• KOWALSKI. •••• ~ _+_ -=. PATTERSON) •• GARTHE ••• -•••• ~ _+_ ..±__ SCOTT) •••••• JUST ••••••••• ~ _+ _ __=. PERRY •••••••• ~ _+_ .:t__ (RE I NH[\RDT) •• ROOT ••••••••• _u:::::. _r__ --= (PEREZ) •••••• SMITH •••••••• ~ _±._:_ ~ (DUTTON) ••••• STEPHENSON... ~ _:t__ ..:L_ (DUNNE) •••••• WINN ••••••••• ·---l.L. _±__ _+_ DISTRICT 3 CLARK ) •••• BATTIN ••••••• ~ ...±.__ ...±.__ -!KOWAL.SKI) ••• FOX ••. •••••••• ,,,.-...:L_ ..±__ SALES) •••••• BLACKMAN ••••• ~ _.,._ --=. HIN ES) •••••• DAV IS •••••••• _u::::::_ ..±....:__ ___:::. EDWARDS • • • • • • _.u:.:. -1.__;_ __ - i PATTERSON) •• GARTH E ••••••• ~ ...::t___ ..±...__ . MATNEY) ••••• GREEN . • • • • • • • ,/' _±__ ..:L__ BROWN) •••••• HYDE ••••••••• ~ _±_____ __.:::.. MARSHOTT. • • • • V--.::L__ _±__ · · PERRY . • • • • • • • ~. _±.___ _±__. (FP~NKIEWICH)ROBERTS •••••• ~---=.----=.. !f NHARDT) •• ROOT ••••••••• ~ + . - HOLLI. NPEN) •• SCOTT. • • • • • • • V---_±___ .±___ DUTTON) ••••• STEPHENSON · ••• ~ _±__ _±_ ROBERT~) •••• STEVENS •••••• ~ ~ ~ iyQN'E. J ••••• WESTRA • • • t_..,-_±___ --=.. DISTRICT 5 CROUL •••••• MC INNIS ••••• --V --= --~ ~ . ~ + BAKER •••••• CLARK •••••• --__±__ _+_ KYMLA •••••••• ~--= ~ DISTRICT 6 PORTER. • • • • • • a_.. ~ ~ (CLARK ) •••• BATTIN ••• ~. \/ _+_ ...±_ (MC INNIS) ••• STORE •••••••• ~ _-t _ _±__ DISTRICT 7 (PEREZ) • • • • • ·SMI TH· • • • • • • .' ~ _+ _ _±___ ( ) .. ··CLAR K ··· ...... ~ ± _±_ (GARTHE)·····PATTERSON····--1..::::::::'. _+ _ _:C__ PORTER ••••••• ~~~ ( ) . Q., ()_, C.V BURTON ••••• QUIGLEY •••••• ------ (MC INNIS) ••• ROGERS ••••••• ~ ~ _±..__ (~ .SH) •••••• SALTARELLI ••• \c _±_~ DISTRICT 11 (MATNEY) ••••• ouKE·········~--= _±___ (CLARK . ) ••• ·BAKER · • • • • • • • ~ _:t:__ _±_ . (MATNEY) ••••• GIBBS········~ _t__ _.±___ DISTRICT 8 . MITCHELL····· ------ ( ) •••••• CLARK • ••••• --__ -- HOLM ········· ------ 2/13/74 JOINT BOAR DS (LANGER ) •••••• FINNELL ••••• --1L... __ fc1 r:.o K ·) D/\VCD , ...... (cLARK ) : : : : :sA:rr!·N::::: :~. ~· (SALES) •••••• _.BLACKMAN •••• ~ __ !EWING) ••••••• CH APUT.::::::_.::::::::... ==== ) • • • • • C LA R K • • • • • • • ---L::::::... HINES) ••••••• DAVIS ••••••• ~ -- MATNEY) •••••• DU KE •••••••. ~ ==== EDWARDS ••••• 1....-- KOWALS KJ) •••• FOX ••••••••• -k::::::._ === PATTERSON) ••• GARTHE •••••• V . MATNEY) •••••• GI BBS .••••• ·.....!L.. -- MATNEY ) • • • • • • G R E EN • • • • • • • -i.:::::::._ -- BR OW N) ••••••• HYDE •••••••• ~==== SCOTT) ••••••• JUST ••••••• ·~ __ FOX)~ •••••••• KOWALSKI •••• ~ MC INNIS) •••• KYM LA ••••••• --1::::::::::. ==== . · MARSHOTT •• .,.~ __ lCROUL) ••••••• MC INNIS ••• ·~ __ STEVE NS) ••••• NEVIL •••••• ·~- GARTHE) •••••• PATTERSON •• ·~ __ PERRY •••••• ·~ __ · PORTER •••••• cu (BURTON) •••••• QUIGLEY ••••• ~ -- . RIMA ••••••• ·~ -- lFRANKIEWJCH) .ROBERTS ••••• _i.:::::::::_.=== MC INNIS)'< ••• ROGERS •••••• v- REINHARDT1 ••• ROOT •••••••• ~==== · · . SALTARELLI.·~ __ HOLLINDEN) ••• SCOTT ••••••• ~ PEREZ)~ •••••• SM ITH .•••••• ~ ==== DUTTON1'< ••••• STEPHENSON •• __..::::,. ROBERTS1'< •••• STEVENS ••••• ~ ==== MC I NN~S1 ••• ,STORE ••••••• ~ ~Y~IJl:.. ••••••• WESTRA .• ·-lL.... === DUNNE) ••••••• WINN ••••••• ·~ __ OTHERS HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS DUNN CLARKE TAYLOR BROWN NISSON BLISS BOETTNER CARLSON FINSTER GALLOWAY HOH EN ER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVENS FEBRUAR Y 1 3 , _197 4 JOINT MEE TING (5) Report of the Joint Chairman Finnell called a meeting of the Executive Committee for 5:30, 2/26/74 and invited Directors Root and Hyde. Also announced that Chairman of the EDP Committee had asked that the members of his committee b e at the Executive Committee also. · (6) Report of the General Manager FAH reported on Project Report at Plant No. 2 regarding work that has to be done to meet state and federal requirements. Said Directors will be shocked by some of the numbers. Regarding grant priorities, for 1972-73 year we were on priority list for 46 MGD facility. Had been given authority by EPA to open bids 9n April 17th. Engineer's estimate -$25 million. In addition to that, for this fiscal year we are submitting a Project Report March 1st for first phase of the Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 which will also meet state and federal requirements. Said this report is what we will be talking about tonight. In reviewing federal requirements, we expanded the report to cover everything we will be doing or need for the next 10 years. For the 1974-75 fiscal year our Districts are in the Priority "D" where it will be fundable for a Step I grant for $100,000 for planning. Planning is in the area of sludge disposal. We will also get a Step II grant which is for the design phase for secondary treatment or the second increment at Plant 2 -$2.7 million for design work. Also for design of odor control facilities and outfall pumping facilities - $700,000 for this . These are two areas we are going to talk to State about . For 1974-75 we are in Categories "G" & "H" for about $30 million. Not fundable at this time. OCSD will receive about $335 million. Harvey Hunt then gave a report on this. Phase I -Plant No. I secondary treatment. Phase II -Plant No. 2 . Said this project report being prepared to be in by March 1st will cover the next phase at Plant No. 2 but also covers five-year expenditure and 10-year plan. Said they thought it necessary for Directors to know total requirements for next 10 years. Proceeded with report according tc State guidelines . 31 State alternates or different ways to meet requirenents. Six general categories, three of which were ocean disposal using i.resent outfall. One of these was to meet secondary treatment require~ent, to meet State ocean plan, and to meet State ocean plan with waiver on grease. Also discharge to land, discharge to river, and reuse of water. Ruled out last three alternates. 10 alternates were looked at in detail, which fell into the category of treatment and disposal to the ocean. Advised that they put together some charts regarding expenditure of monies and what is achieved with expenditure of moni~s. Reviewed charts with Directors. Said that these figures were considerably higher t han estimate of two years ago or $105 or 123 million because of (a) sludge handing (b) now escalating these costs over 10-year construction period instead of 3~year period (c) regulations are more restrictive than they were two years ago . and (d) since building the facilities is spread out over 10 years, cost to treat the flow that . is going to arrive between now and then is about $275.9 million. This is what would be required if we had to meet what the federal government now calls "secondary treatment" with the entire flow, as well as meet the State Ocean Plan. A large amount of this may be coming from state and federal government in the form of grants. Referred to charts again. Hyde commented with regard to the Districts selling 150 MGD or something like-that. FAH advised that it was 30 MGD. Hyde then said they had ~\sold about half the interest and had to be a good deal of the cost of ~ the treatment, etc. Asked what our total capacity is? Harvey Hunt ' ~~' answered that our present flow is 155 MGD and existing capacity is 160 MGD ~ "1w ithout standby. Hyde then asked if agency that we sold 30 MGD to has )\ to increase their flow, would we have to sell them more? FAH said we are not ~ommitted to take more. , Hyde then stated that he was just trying to find out if we should continue to sell capacity to someone without annexing to the District. Mr. Harper advised that in D:~tri~t 7 thay just den::~ t~c Lo s Al i sos Water District even though it looked very favorable on paper to the District. Referred to line throu gh Santa Ana Canyon and said this would carry 30 million ga llons of sa line water. Comm itment Districts have made upstream is strictly for 30 MG D capacity. Harvey Hunt said that contract provides for upstream users to pay for increased treatment. Root then asked if there was any thought being given to by-product ~ developme nt. Sludge for fuel, fertilizers,etc. Harvey answered that Lu -..,.s ludge is now being sold for fert i lizer, large ly industries. Districts ~~\ ..u""'have experiments und e r way . Ray Lewis is wo r king wit h County Road ~~~ Department on alternate fuel source. Ray said it looked very promising \;' right now. Finnell mentioned that the Distr ic ts had been considered for an experimental site. Harvey Hunt added that our gas will support majority of power at plants. Perry asked what percent of costs will have to come from our Districts, besides upper Districts share and federal funding? Mr. Harper answered that for 30 MGD of primary treatment, that capacity is based on fixed figures with escalation. In that area, wh ich will be subject to federal funding, we will have to pay whatever these figures will be. Buy at S MGD secondary increments. Will share with us in grant program. Will pay operating cost plus 10%. Districts don't anticipate any problems. Finnell then remarked that while report must address EPA and California standards, the cover letter can certainly be used as an expression of the most rational approach. FAH said he thought that this report was done at the request of the State and EPA and thought that because of the magnitude of the numbers, they will look at this for some time and see if this is really what they want . Root added that our costs would be magnified many times for agencies up the coast and for others not as we ll off as we are. Would be 3 or 4 times the cost for LA County. Advised Directors that JWS was now working on actual cash flow and wo uld be incorporated in a report later. Finnell asked to see maintenance costs. Question ~ was asked if Carollo's reports could be condensed intc small reports. Harper said we hope to take first couple chapters which are summary chapters and incorporate graphs in a summary report. Finnell then referred to Item No. 67 -District 3 public hearing re Bolsa Chica Annexation. Asked if there were any people in audience specifically there for public hearing. Then announced that that item would be taken up in regular sequence. (7) Report of the General Counsel Nisson reported that he attended the CASA Workshop Conference in Indian Wells, January 25th. Had a good work session. Had 12 attorneys from throughout the State. Spent considerable amount of time working on "conflict of interest" legislation and amendment that is being worked· on now, and picked up some information on amendments to guidelines for _EPA which he said he would talk about later. Reported on another matter that had come to his attention. Had a request from East Bay Municipal Water District for some assistance on a law suit they were involved in~-College District vs. East Bay.?? District had some water rights and City entered into redevelopment and had to abandon certain streets and when abandoned, did not reserve water rights. Peralta Junior College built a line where water rights were. Dispute is who is to pay for this $278,000. So far the school district has prevailed and East Bay MUD has had to move at their own expense. Said this represents a rather serious inroad upon special districts regarding rights of way in the streets. Nisson stated that he would like to know if .our Districts would be willing to lend some support. Said he thought it might be worthwhile to joint with other '· -2- people who are writing briefs, such as LA County, and share some of the expense. (Not over $1000) If Directors want to take action on this: would be iP order h~c:::i,i 1s e :i.t is an iss u e w':' i:rti~h ~ fai:e . Saltarelli asked if this happened because of an error of .omission? Nisson answered no. Mr. Harper recommended that the Board concur in the recommendation of the General Counsel for an amount not to exceed $10 0 0. It was then so moved and seconded and ·the motion carried. Baker then asked what roll the Special Districts Association was play ing in this request. Nissen answered _ they were writing a special brief. Kymla also advised D.irectors that they should probably be aware that East Bay MUD was asking other agencies for assistance in another lawsuit regarding taking water from northern California. Attorney General has intervened and is asking other water districts to assist them in that suit. Hyde asked what this ·$1000 was for. Nisson answered for sharing the cost of the preparation of the brief with LACSD. Would b e coming in as a friend of the court with a joint brief. Kymla then asked what efforts we were making with regard to introducing legislation? Nissen said this just came up within the last couple weeks so couldn't answer that. Nisson added that it was a matter of timing. This issue is now and legislation would be in the future. Kymla also asked if City entered into redevelopment knowing that lines were there and was answered yes. Roberts stated that in an in-government suit, it would be the citizen who would pay for it. Said he would prefer to see the suggestion implemented into the motion to direct our efforts to request clarifica- tion of State law. Nisson answered that· when court decision is made, will be cleared up. Legislation is problematical thing. Patterson said if utility is using city street and city abandoned that right of way, why should city have to buy another ri g ht of wa y ? Nissen advised that if the use of a district such as our is considered a governmental function as opposed to proprietary func ~ion, rules have been that would be valid for environmental decisi1n. Is important from Districts' standpoint that we maintain these righ ~s. Called for the question on motion to authorize expenditure of $1000 to share cost of joint brief. Roll call vote was taken and motion carried . (10) -CONSENT CALENDAR Chaput moved to removed items lO(a) and lO(b) from consent calendar. (lOa) Item was moved and seconded. Chaput then asked why we only get one or two bids when we buy a vehicle? Bill Clarke answered that we mailed specifications to 7 firms. Is a very · special v e hicl e for beach run required by State. Has to run down through wat e r line and only d e aler that would bid j eep with fiber g lass body was Bri a n Chuchua. Had option to buy body and inst a ll ourselves. Reported that on trucks (lOb) sent to 1 2 firms. Prob l e m was with trade -ins . Had two trucks to trade in. Can't unde r s tand wh y they don't bid. WNC said they conta cte d e v e r y body b y t e l e phon e before sending out bids and they indicated they wo uld try to bid. Chaput asked if the body was like a dune buggy a nd Bill answered no, it was just like a jeep body only made of fiber g l ass . -3- •. Store stated that we should try to get as many b i ds as we could and looked as if staff certainly tried to do their best. Should perhaps take people off the l is t if th=y don'~ give us a bid. Smlth disa gr eed with that and said in Orange they sometimes didn't get the local bid and end up with only one bid. Hyde asked if part of the spec was that a trade -in was required and was answered yes. Bill Clarke said we could cons ider not trading in vehicles or having an annual auction. Winn moved approval of items lO(a) and lO(b). Motion seconded and carried. Smith commented that they have an auction in Orange and it works out better. (12) Report re Guidelines Nissen reported that on December 7th guidelines were made. for a copy but haven't received them yet. February 7th was Said that last time Directors authorized General Manager to guidelines subject to Nisson's approval. Would probably do Nissen gets to see guidelines. (13) Report re "conflict of interest" legislation Wrote deadline. approve that after Regarding "Conflict of Interest" l egislation , Nisson reported that if Directors, as a Distric t agency, decide t o adopt guidel i nes and attempt to comply with this, thought the y would be i mmune from civil penalties and sanctions which would dep rive them of public office, but since Directors are not elected to this office, don't know how this would work. Pending amendm ent s are due in April and rather than suggest to study and adopt _ guidelines, suggested that Directors wait until amendment comes out and maybe will understand it a little better. Said he spent t wo hours working on this a t CASA Conference and came up with very little consensus of opinion. Finnell stated that he thought it might be a good idea to discuss this at next Executive Committee meeting and report back to Joint Boards next month. Hyde then asked if Nisson was aware that they have already removed the emergency clause of this legislat ion. Nisson said the last thing he heard was that as a d octor or lawyer, they would not have to name each client or patient . Jerry Patterson said that perhaps we shoul d move ahead as there may be no amendment this year . Secondly, may want to include certain staff people in .this. Roberts asked if it were true or not, that Directors of the District are required specifically to file a separate declaration and to whom .do they file? Niss.on said first with their own city and he thought with the . Districts also. It was then moved and second ed t o r efer t hi s to th e Executive Committee and General Counsel for study and report bac k to the Joint Boards. Motion carried . Smith further advised that this form had to b e fil e d with the Registrar of Voters. Roberts also asked if after revi ew , would the Executive Committee answer his question. He was answered , yes. •. 'r (14b) Reclaimed Water Pricing Policy Committee Scott referred to No. 1 on 1st page of report. Sajd re a son for recommendations on back page was that they were asking for power to develop an agreement with Sanitation Districts and Water District. One of the things they are going to ask for is a committee of two people from Water District and Sanitation District to review and approve all contracts. Regarding City of Costa Mesa, they are ready to go with their design and is Committee's recommendation that the same benefit be extended to City of Costa Mesa through July 1, 1976 because it is in conjunction with agreement we already have. Hyde said he moved all but the two-man committee. Scott advised that the recommendation was just to let them negotiate this agreement and the two-man committee would be part of the negotiation. Then would come back to the Board. Hyde said he didn't think we could delegate .that authority. Finnell then reiterated that specified action was to engage in negotiations with Flood Control for Costa Mesa to be free until 1976. It was moved and seconded to approve recommendation. Motion carried. EXECUTIVE SESSION: 8:47 -9:23 p.m. -J (24a) Motion includes typo change in Section 5 -197 4 ~ ~ (24b) Moved & seconded. (24c) Hyde moved to increase department heads'salaries 8% ?? Kymla then made a substitute motion to approve General Manager's recommendation for three department heads for an increase of 11%. Called for ~he question. Roll call vote. Motion carried. (29) ALL DISTRICTS -Other business f;- Hyde stated that they hadn't considered the General Manager's salary yet and asked when they did t~at? Finnell answe~ed whenever ~he Directors desired. Said last year he got an increase the same time as the department heads. Finnell asked if Directors needed ari . executive session. It was moved and seconded to increase his salary 11%. Gibbs stated this would be more appropriate in an executive session. Hyde then moved to convene in executive session (9:30 p.m.) Mclnnis withdrew his second to the motion increasing salary 11%, and it was moved and seconded to refer this to the Executive Committee for review and recommendation. Called for the question. Motion carried. Stephenson said should be considered with same retroactive date as others. Finnell s tated that that would be up to Directors when this comes back to Board. •. .. ~ ': . .. " -5- (41) Annexation request from State Dept. of Parks & Recreation -DIST. 11 · Question was asked regarding when a recommendation would be on ~his request and was answered, at the next Joint Board Meeting. (51) Report on Irvine Industrial Annexation -No. 39-DIST. 7 Mr. Harper reported that the staff actually recomm ends two different alternate approaches to this and the Directors may wish to review this, possibly at an adjourned meeting immediately preceding the Executive Committee meeting on the 26th. Said this annexation has some far reaching effects. Chairman Smith suggested that the y hold an adjourned meeting prior to the Executive Committee meeting. (55) It was moved and seconded to adjourn to 4:30 p.m., February 26th. (58) DIST. 2 -Report on Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reach 3 Mr. Harper referred to the aerial photograph on the wall. Said . this ·project will cost $7.3 million, the District's share of wh i ch will be approximately $1.3 million. Originally, District 2 had projected $2.2 million for this project because of ·concern of Air Quality Board and EPA over the size of the sewer that would be constructed through this area. Have held discussions with State Board and have come up with pipe size that would allow 30 MGD--beginning at lower end with 25 MGD and .upper end 11 MGD. Not as much as originally anticipated but felt it would be adequate for the long haul. Particularly, if water reclamation plant is built later where Santa Ana River crosses Riverside Freeway. Will be a saving to the District from the amount budgeted of $900,000. Will have to change the agreement we have with Upper Basin right now. What we are relying on is surplus capacities in the line. Will have to be restricted to 30 MGD. District 2 will have anything ·over and above that. Upper Basin's portion of this project will be $6.4 million. Originally anticipated $5.3 million. Their portion has increased and savings to District is about $900,000. Smith asked if this will meet the Master Plan. Mr. Harper answered that it would as the zoning is being changed and the densities are being reduced in the County portion. Don Martinson added that it would meet down-graded zoning requiremements of County but would not meet 1971 Master Plan Report. Does meet requirements of current land use plan. Root asked if there was any pumping required along there and was answered that it was all gravity sewer. , Finnell then questioned what would happen if Anaheim was successful in its annexations in the Canyon and their density projections are followed rather than the County Plan? Don Martinson advised that there are five different development organizations in the Canyon. Amount of sewage varies very widely. If you go to extreme development, are short about 15 MGD capacity. This line meets requirements for moderate development of Canyon. Pipe size varies from 39 inches at County line to 51 inches at lower end as it joins Reach 2. Was 60 inch line before. Will take care of growth the way it has been planne ~by County.~....4-. !{/< , 10-<-L "?'t Q -~ ,,. e::u ..... ., ~ ~ 4vC<..u__ ~ . Finnell then asked f£D there (;'as any w ~hat Yorba Linda & Anahei ?~ could present to the Distri d t their particular views along this line ~ d"t(, Said what he was really concerned about is that he didn't want to ~ pay for interceptor and then two years from now "X" gets land instead ~ of "Y" and then they have to put another line up the Canyon. . ~~~ Stephenson advised that Anaheim would be very willing. ~'\· Chaput said this was rather a ridiculous position. Thought we ~ <{ probably have excess capacity. Their general plan is established / ~ ~ t the East. & I / . i:."' 1 -.. ~ Cs/) i.. ~ cJf V.-e ' (tJ:. e.. c &-...<... lM.._' (J v "{ ,Jt,r C" &... c,..< c c .,, y ' "--1~(.,,...Yh/•·~""-( /'Jr.,,•p ... fr'-" ' " ~ QAJ_L• ""' 9"'"'"~ ~/' ..... l ·-~ " ~I GvvJJJ ~~ k Lt~ D----u - ~ ~~ "" Clark then asked if Don Martinson's recommendation took into consideration the agricultural reserve in that area. He answered yes, they included this area as "op en space and agricultural reserve."· ClarK ~hen asked if he was aware that Anaheim Hills had a petition that would come up next week to get out of this reserve and open for development. Mr. Martinson just answered that the agricultural reserve area had been taken into account. ~ v Root asked if they hadn't made quite a thing about buying extra , capacity in that line up t o San Bernardino? Is that what we are \i'"' reflecting here or is . this a change? FAH said this is a change , S because State and EPA does not go along with that. Finnell commented that thi s doesn't reflect as much excess capacity as talked about before. Are paying for certain capacity for normal planning and normal land use projected for Canyon area, and are buying excess capacity based on the pipe flowing full rather than the District's normal designed capacity. That is how you come up with 25 MGD capacity. Smith asked if this will affect annexations in the future and how much is in District now? Was answered yes it wouid and that District's boundary was at Weir Canyon Road. Don Martinson said 15 MGD was provided from boundary on out. Smith then asked what EPA's reason was--did they want to stop growth? Finnell said they wanted to restrict air pollution in the basin. Ray Lewis then reported that he had discussions in Sacramento with State and EPA people regard i ng reclamation project. Are three things that haven't been resolve·d at thi s time. Plan is proposed to handle immediate n eeds and future needs. Have proposed reclamation plant but is not a very favorable project because there are other projects with mor~ priority. Would have to be a separation of two wastes--brines ·from upper districts and ",wastes from District 2 that would be r ec laimed at reclamation plant. To minimize the air pollution in this area, _they felt that if we extend beyond 1 983 growth projection in the Canyon area, that EPA may write an EIA on this project that would delay it one or one ~nd a half years. Is a necessity for parallel system to separate lines for this capacity and p rovid e for the growth under the modif.ie_d · d~velopm e nt plan for the basin area and at such time that the reclamation plant becomes a r ea lity, then it will be necessary to separate the two wastes. Finnell asked if cities have agreed to that · modi J.ied pl~n?r Don Martin~on said cities in County are now performing a j0 i nt study. Studying how this Santa Ana Canyon area should be developed. Five different configurations under study. Have decided yet. Just .said this sounds good but had debated and talked a lot about 30 MGD. Need iomethirig a lot stronger tha n what we are getting now. Finnell stated that if there is some excess capacity, are not wasting a lot of money but if converse is true, will be a di scussion area. Three entities involved--Yorba Linda, Anaheim and County. Said that if he heard from three cities that 19 MGD excess capacity would be sufficient throu gh 1983, would be prepared to vote for them. Nevil said that critical question is prognosis for parallel line. Asked ~t what futur e point in time would they estimate. Ray Lewis said he couldn't gu ess right now. · Don Martinson added th at cities ' f unded study was a two-year s tudy and g oal is to eva luate costs of a ll gove rnmental services and all configurations. Mr. Harper asked at the high density plan, when would this sewer have to b e replaced? Don Martinson answered that it would be a long range thing. Would take up to year 2000 even under extreme conditions. 0 I!--{, «c,,, l (?U;J :7 ~ C 1 JC Q-__ v_JJ-f'L~" ~ zr.,_f ~r I . . . Chaput asked what the excess capacity was under the present plan and if our report was going to indicate how this is going to be u s ed and will other questions be answered in this EIS report? WR~ ~n sw ere~ yes . Mr. Harper said will have capacity to serve that area based on modified plan of County with sewer flowing full. EIR will state that p ipe is being designed for 30 MGD plus very restrictive amount (S MGD ) for District 2. Smith asked if it was possible in the future to have holding tanks and was answered yes, would be put in plan. Nevil then asked what action was required of them tonight and if they should have a special meeting of the District? Mr. Harper said yes he felt they should have a meeting of District 2 after the report had been prepared. Will be sometime in March. (65) DIST. 2 -Other business FAH advised that there was going to be a trip that is being sponsored by District 2 and Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority on Friday at 9:00 a.m. to tour Prado Dam at which point the SAWPA group will be giving a resolution to the Board of Supervisors thanking them for the line under the dam. Advised the Pirectors that anyone wishing to go, should contact him. (67) (a) Chair declared public hearing open. (b) JWS gave summary of actions (c) No written protests ·filed to date (d) Chairman asked if · there was anyone in the audience wishing to protest? (e) Chairman declared public hearing closed there being no oral prbtests. (70) Boyle Engineering proposal re Knott Interceptor, Contract 3-20 Roberts said Cypress had a question regarding percent of engineering to total value of project. Think a letter to city councils or mayors would be appropriate. Engineering cost of 23% or something like that is significant percentage and would like ~ letter of explanation. Ray Lewis stated that percentage of fees is 3.1 % of total estimated construction cost for Reaches 5 through 8. $10 million figure. Roberts said the original letter was difficult to understand then because it appeared to be a significant percentage. Hyde then asked if we didn't go for bid on the engineering services for a job of $10 millio~? Roberts said he wanted to address himself to the question as a professional engineer. Said the only alternative is to select another engineer without discussion of the fee. We select the engineer based upon qualifications, not based upon fee. If we are picking him based upon fee, is not an e thical eng ineer. · Finnell stated he didn't want to g et embroiled in this dicussion as he had very definite views. Mr. Harper advised that we got involved two or three y ears a g o with soil ~ngine~rs and got into qu~te a mess attempting to ge t bids. Regarding this proposal, the preliminary eng ineering work was done by Boyle and there was a credit to their propo s al. -8- -~ Hyde then asked how many years Boyle had been with District 3.· Was answered since 1958. Hyde remarked that no other engineering f!=~ h~d be Gn a ble to get any of the work ur fees ~ince ~nen. No~ ethical. A good case of anti-trust. Maybe could save some money. Roberts stated that he shared Hyde's concern but thought time to evaluate the engineer is before project, not now. Directors get information much too late regarding evaluation of engineer. Finnell then stated that in the few years that he had been on the Board have never heard staff say we should continue to work with this engineering firm. If Directors desire to have review of services of Boyle, it is their selection. Does not have to be on any special project. Should meet once a year and review methods being used. As Directors have never reviewed engineering services, except JCE, think it is our position as Directors to do so. Hyde agreed with Finnell. Scott said if staff recommends Bo yle or whoever, it is okay with him. (76) DIST. 3 -Other business Hyde moved that a report be prepared on the engineering fir~ for Directors' review .and consideration. Green said he agreed. (Seconded the motion??) Same problem with consulting engineers. Couldn't back up report but charge a lot. Problem primarily with fees and once a year review might be a good deal. Called for the question. Motion carried. Roberts then suggested that a description of the process of selecting -.a professional engineering firm be included in report. ·Re Annexatio~ 3E, Edwards said at last meeting he believed ~it sounded like Midway City Sanitary District was to blame for this. Said problem began in 1972 and read letter received from Districts regarding this. Reviewed what had happened to date regarding annexation. Stressed it wasn't ·their fault entirely. Niss o n said reason for delay was not any public agency but was developer. He m ~de his arrangements and then dawdled along th~ way. Didn't me an to give the implication that it was Midway City's fault. ( -~- , I ! COUNTY SANITAT ION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 31 5, 6 1 7 1 AND 11 DISTRICT NO. 1 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 2 Directorq present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 3 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 5 Directors present : Directors absent: DISTRIC T NO . 6 Directors present : Direct o rs absent : DISTRICT NO. 7 Directors present: Directors absent : DISTRICT NO. 11 Directors pre se nt: Directors absent : MINUTES OF THE REGU LAR ME ETING February 13, 1974 -7:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis A¥enue Fountain Valley, California ROLL CALL Jerry Patterson (Chairman), Robert Battin, and Donald Saltarelli Kerm Rima Robert Ne~il (Chairman), Dale Ch~pui, Ralph Cl~rk,· Robert Finnell, Thoma s Kowalski, John Garthe, Edward Just , Bob Perry, Robert Root, Don Smith, Mark Stephenson, and Donald Winn· None Donald Fox (Chairman), Robert Battin, Thomas Blackman , Jesse Davis , Roland Edwards, Joh n Gart he , Jack Green , -Joseph Hyde , Frank Ma rsh ott , Bob Perry, Henry Roberts, Jr., Ro bert Root, George Scott,. Mark Stephenson, Charles Stevens, Jr ., and Jake Westra None Don Mcinnis (Chairman), David Baker , and Carl Kymla None ·Robert Bat~in (Chairman pro tern), and John Store Ellis Porter (Chairman) Don Smith (Ch a irman ), Ralph Clark, Jerry Patterson, Howard Rogers , and Donal d Saltarelli Ellis Porter and E. Ra y Quigley He nry Duke (C hairma n), David Baker , a nd Norma Gibbs Non e 2/13/74 STAFF MEMBERS P~SENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary, Ray Lewis, Ted Dunn, William Clarke, and Rita Brown · Mayor Carolyn Ewing, C. Arthur Nissen, General Counsel, Conrad Hohener, Harvey Hunt, Milo Keith, and Robert Webber A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation · Dis.tricts· Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, was held at 7:30 p.m. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation, the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District's Board. DISTRICT 6 Appointment of Chairman pro tern * * * * * * * * * * * * Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Director Battin be appointed Chairman pro tern in the absence of Chairman Porter. DISTRICT 3 Excerpt re Board appointment received and filed · Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Minute Excerpt from the City of La Palma regarding appoint- ment of Jake J. Westra as substitute alternate to attend the February 13, 1974, meeting be received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular me~ting held January 9, 1974, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 2 Moyed, seconded, an~ duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held January 9, 1974, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded,-and duly carried: Approval of minutes That th~ minutes ot the regular meeting held January 9~ 1974, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held January 9, 1974,· be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held January 9, 1974, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held January 9, 1974, and adjourned regular meeting held January 23, 1974, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held January 9, 1974, be approved as mailed. -2- 2/13/74 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Finnell called a Report of the fueeting. of the Executive Commit~~e Joint Chairman for 5:30 p.m., Tuesday, February 26, 1974, and invited Directors Robert Root, Joseph Hyde, and members of the Special Committee on Feasibility of Electronic Data Processing to attend and participate in the discussions. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager The General Manager reported on the current construction grant eligibility of several planned joint works projects. Two major projects are the $27 million Activated Sludge Treatment Fac~lity at Reclamation Plant No. i for which the Districts have been authorized to open bids on April 17th; and Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 for which the project report will be submitted on March 1st ·to the State Water Resources Control Board. The Plant No. 2 report has been expanded to encompass all treatment works improvements and expansions for the next ten years, during which it is estimated that the. tota~ cost will be $275.9 million. Mr. Harvey Hunt of John Carollo Engineers, Districts' consulting treatment plant engineers, then reviewed the construction progr~~ necessary to meet secondary treatment requirements promulgated by the Environmental· Protection Agency,. as outlined in the project report. The program will also meet the State Water Resources Control Board's Ocean Plan for California. Current increased cost projections reflect the addition of sludge handling facilities, increased regulatory restrictions, and the inflationary impact on construction costc of_ extending the constructlon program over a ten-year period. Board members then asked questions regarding the report, during which the propriety of the Districts selling capacity in the tr~atment system to other agencies, and the utilization of. treatment process by-products such as digester gas as an energy source was also discussed. · ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing General Counsel to file brief in connection with special districts' The General Counsel reported that East Bay Municipal.Water District (Oakland) had requested assistance from sewerage districts in connection with a lawsuit brought against East Bay by a junior college district. .The suit challenges special districts'. rights of way authority wherein.East Bay i's be·ing forced by the courts to pay for relocation of their facility by the junior college in rights of way re East Bay MUD vs. Peralta Junior College District a previously abandoned city right of way which had been turned over to a redevelopment agency. The General Counsel recGmmended that he be given authority to file a brief jointly with Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts as a "friend of the court" in connection with said lawsuit. During the discussion that followed, several Directors expressed the view that clarifying legislation should be considered. The General Counsel agreed; however, he pointed out that in this par- ticular case, time was of the essence. Following further discussion, it was then moved, seconded, and carried by roll call vote: That the General Counsel, at his discretion, be authorized to participate in the filing of a brief with the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts in support of East Bay Municipal Utility District in connection with the lawsuit brought by Peralta Junior College againit East Bay, for the ·purpose of clarifying special districts' rights of way authority; and, FURTHER MOVED: That expenditures in connection with filing ~f said brief be authorized in an amount ncit to exceed $1,00D.OO. -3- 2/13/74 ALL DISTRICTS ~oved, seconded, and duly carri~d: Receive and file written report of Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive Committee dated February 7, 1974, be received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Accepting proposal of Enchanter, Inc. re oceanographic services That the proposal submitted by Enchanter, Inc. dated January 24, 1974, for oceanographic services be received, ordered filed, a~d accepted; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be authorized to engage said firm at the new-rates effective March 1, 1974, as follows: .Monthly rate ..........•.•.........•. $3,000.00/rno. Per diem services in excess of 150 hours per month ........•.. ~. 150.00/day Construction diving or diving requiring more than three air tanks per day ...•.......•...... 200.00/day ALL DISTRICTS Moved,·seconded, and duly carried: Amending authorization for engineering services re Project Report for. Improved Treatment Facilities at Plant No. 2 That authorization of October 10, 1973, for engineering services of John Carollo Engineers in connection with preparation of Project Report for ·Improved Treatment Facilities at Plant No. 2 be amended to atithorize an increase in the maximum engineering fees from $65,000 to $85,000. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, ~econded, and duly carried: Authorizing engage~ent of Richard J. Shaffer, Consultant, to conduct study on purchasing and warehousing policies That Richard J. Shaffer, Consultant, be engaged to conduct a study and make recommendations on purchasing for a _maximum fee not to and warehousing policies and pr6cedures, exceed $2,200.00~ as follows: Task Completed Review and document exi·sting warehousing and purchasing policies and procedures and anticipate future needs for purchasing and warehousing activities Consider viable alternatives and submit written recommendation re best alternative system Document recommendations including procedures, policies, forms; flow charts, job descriptions, and staffing Cost of study and recommendation Ass is t District's' staff in implementing recom~endations (at per diem rate of $100) Total Maximum Cost -4- Fee Due Upon Completion of Task $ 400.00 400.00 400.00 $1,200.00 1,000.00 Max. $2,200.00 ALL DISTRICTS Ratifying action of General Manager in awarding printing of plans and specifications re Job No. Pl-16 · 2/13/74 ~oved, seconded, and duly carried: That the action of the General Manager in awarding printing of plans and specifications for 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Reclama- tion Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-16, to the low bidder, United Repro- graphics, Inc., in the amount of $10,784.00, plus tax, be ratified. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing one-year extension for Operation Transition Work Experience Program Environmental Protection ALL DISTRICTS Declaring intent to approve amendment to Public E~ployees' Retirement System re one-half continuance of post retirement survivors' allowance Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That a one-year extension for Operation Transition Work Experience Program conducted in cooperation with Orange.Coast College and the Agency, be approved. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boa~ds of Directors adopt Resolution No. 74-19, declaring intent to approve an amendment to the contract between the Board of Administration of the Public Employees Retirement ·system and Distr~ct No. 1, providing for one-half continuance of post retirement survivors' allowanee effective July 1, 1974. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Authorizing Director of Finance to participate on ·That the Director of Finance be · authorized to attend and participate in meetings in connection with his membership on the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies' cornmi ttee on user charges and . industrial cost recovery; and, · ·AMSA Cornmittee re user charges and industrial cost recovery FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement .for travel, lodging, meals, and incidental expenses incurred in connection with attendance at said meetings is hereby authorized. ALL -DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried: ·That the General Manager be .author~zed to attend concurrent meetings of the Water Pollution Control Federation-- Le gis lati ve Seminar, and the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) in Washington, D.C. on March 25th and 26~h; and, Authorizing General Manager to attend WPCF and AMSA meetings in Washington, D.C. FUR~HER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, lodging, meals, and incidental expenses incurred in connection with attendance at said meetings is hereby authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Award of purchase Specifications A-070 and A-071 Following a request for removal from the consent calendar of the items regarding award of purchase for Speci,fications Nos. A-070 and A-071, the Districts' Maintenance Superintendent reviewed the specifications and bids in connection with One (1) 4-Wheel Drive "Jeep Universal", Specification A-070, and Two (2) 3/4 Ton Cab & Chassis Trucks, Specification A-071. Following a brief discussion by the Boards, the following actions were taken: -5- 2/13/74 ALL DISTRICTS Awarding purchase of .One 4-Wheel Drive "Jeep Uni versa.l", Specification No. A-070 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the bid tabulation and recommenda- tion for purchase of One (1) 4-Wheel Drive "Jeep Universal", Specification No. A-070, be received and ordered filed, and that the General Manager be authorized to issue a purchase order to Brian Chuchua's 4-Wheel Drive Center, in the amount of $4,301.21. ALL DISTRICTS Awarding purchase of Two 3/4-Ton Cab & Chassis Trucks, Specifi- cation No. A-071 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the bid tabulation and recommenda- tion for purchase of Two (2) 3/4-Ton Cab & Chassis Trucks, Specification No. A-071, be received and ordered filed, and that the a purchase order to of $5,704.92. General Manager be authorized.to issue Tommy Ayres Chevrolet in the amou.nt ALL DISTRICTS Report of General Counsel re amendments to Districts' Uniform Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Act of 1970 The General Counsel reported that the State had adopted amendments to the California Environmental Act of 1970. ·The State, however, failed to notify special districts of the amendments which ~ill require revisions to the Districts' Uniform Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Act of 1970·, effective February 15, 1974. Mr. Nissen reported that he and the General Manager were authorized to.approve the guidelines when originally adopted by the Board,. subject to the Directors' ratification," and stated that the same procedure could be followed for the ame.!J.dments. ALL DISTRICTS Report of General Counsel re "Conflict of Interest" legislation and referring to Executive Committee Mr. Nissan reported that he had attended the Attorneys Co.mmittee meeting at the California As~ociation of Sanitation Agencies Workshop (CASA) in January during which there was considerable discussion by the. Committee on the rec.ently enacted "conflict of interest" legi·slation. . Presently, there are pending amendments to the legislation which . would substantially clarify the language of the original bill. The Counsel then discussed in general terms the impact of the legislation on the Districts' Directors and suggested that the Boards defer action until the amendments are acted upon by the legislature. The Board then entered into a lengthy discussion concerning the legislation and its relationship to the Districts' Directors and the respective public entities which they represent. It was then moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the matter be referred to the Executive Committee and that the General Counsel be. directed to submit a report to the Committee for study and report back to the joint Boards at the regular March meeting. ALL DISTRICTS Receive, file, and anprove report and recowE.endations of Reclaimed Water Pricing Policy Comrr.i ttee Director Scott, Chairman of the Speqial Committee on Reclaimed Water Pricing Policy reviewed the. Committee's report and recommenda- tions as follows: (1) That the Joint Boards authorize the Committee to enter into negotiations with the Orange County Water District for -6- ,,,,,. ... -~ ..... 2/13/74 the purpose of developing an agreement whereby the Sanitation Districts would supply up to 50 mgd of secondary treated water from its facilities at Plant No. 1 for reclamation purposes and that the Water District, acting as the water purveyor, would actively seek to contract with various entities and individuals for the sale of the reclaimed water. The revenues to be shared by both entities. (2) In addition to the above recomr.iendation, immediate action should be taken by the Bqards ~o promote the efforts of the Orange County Flood Control District and the City of Costa Mesa. The Committee recommends the following interim actions: (a) Authorize the staff to inform the Orange County Flood Control District that pursuant to their request for up to 10,000 gallons per day of effluent for their two-year pilot irrigation program for landscaping a section of the Santa Ana River levee, that the Districts supply the necessary raw seconda~y effluent free of charge and that all regulatory agency use permits be acquired by the Flood Control District. ·If the pilot program is successful, the Flood Control District will be able to contract with the Orange County Water District for future needs. (b) Encourage the City of Costa Mesa to proceed with its project to utilize secondary treated waste water for golf course irrigation, and that the Districts offer to supply secondary treated effluent in accordance with . their request, at no charge, to July 1, 1976. Subsequent to July, 1976, the City can contract with the Orange County Water District for its future water requirements. Following a brief discussion, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: · That the written report of the Reclaimed.Water Pricing Policy Committee dated February 6, 1974, be received and ordered filed, and that the Committee recommendations be approved .. l\LL DISTRICTS Moved, ·seconded, and duly carried: Awarding contract for Additional Boiler Facilities That the Boards of Directors adopt at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-035 Standard ·Resolution No. 74-20, to . receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Additional Boiler Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-035, to Porter Boiler Service, Inc. in the amount of $37,573.00. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Rejecting bids for Repair of Two Gas Spheres at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. PW-036, and ordering work done by Districts' forces Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 74-36, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation for Repair of Two Gas Spheres at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. PW-036, rejecting all bids, and directing that said work be accomplished by utilization of Districts' forces. Certified copy of this · resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -7- 2/13/74 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Amending authorization re Phase I of Resources That authorization of October 10, Management Pro[)rc:.i.m 1973, approving implementation of Phase I of Resources Management Program be amended; and that the maximum amount authorized be increased from $33,000 to $39,500. ALL DISTRIC7S Approving Change Order No. 1 to plans and specifi- cat·ions for Job ~;o. PW-032 . Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. ·1 to the plans and specifications for Resources Management Center at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-032, granting an extension of time of 18 calendar days to the contract with B & J Construction Company, be approved. Copy of this Change Order is attached hereto and made a part of these mi·nutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Accepting Job No. PW-032 as complete That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 74-22, accepting Resources Management Center at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-032, as complete, and authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Accepting proposal of John Carollo Engineers ~ re design of gas engine- dri ven pump units at Foster Booster Station, Job J-6-1 Job No. J-6~1, be received, Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the proposal submitted by John Carollo Engineers, dated February 5, 1974, for design of two sludge gas engine-driven pump units in the existing Foster Booster Station, ordered filed, and accepted; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be authorized to direct the engineers to proceed with said work for a lump sum fee of $49,100; and, · · FURTHER MOVED: In the ·event the Districts require additional assistance in preparation of reports, supplements, documents, attending meetings, etc., in obtaining State.and Federal Grants on the project, the General Manager is hereby authorized to engage the engineers for ·said services ·on an hourly basis in -accordance with the follo~ing fee schedule: · Title Partner Head Engineer Project Engineer Senior Engineer Engineer Associate Engineer Assistant Engineer Junior Engineer Senior Draftsman Draftsman Junior Draftsman Clerical Typist -8- Rate-Per Hour $33.65 31.85 26.50 23. 90 22.80 2J.. 00 19.40 17.65 14.65 13.80 12.50 10.65 8.65 - ALL DISTRICTS Receive an& file ~financial report of Director of Finance 2/13/74 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the financial report of the Director of Finance for the six-month period ending December 31, 1973, be received, ordered filed, and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Convene in executive session ALL DISTRICTS Reconvene in regular session ALL DISTRICTS Amending Positions and At 8:47 p.m., the Boards convened in executive session to consider personnel matters. At 9:23 p.m., the Boards reconvened iri regular session. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Salaries Resolution That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 74-23, as corrected, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 71-3, as amended, adjusting salaries for Operations Division employees. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing payment of accumulated compensatory time to Districts' employee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the General Counsel's opinion, dated January 22, 1974, regarding legality of paying overtime to District personnel in lieu 9f time off be received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That payment of 96 hours ($606.25) accumulated compensatory time to Russell D. Wold, Districts' Construction Inspector, because of severe financial hardship resulting from extensive family medical expenses, be authorized. ALL DISTRICTS. Amending Positions and Salaries Resolution Following a motion to approve a salary adjustment of eight and one- quarter percent for ·three Department Heads, a substitute motion was offered to approve a salary adjustment of eleven percent for said Department Heads. The substitute motion was then seconded and, carried by roll call vote: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 74-37, ·amending Positions and· Salaries Resolution No.· 71-3, as amended~ approving salary adjustments for three D~partment Heads. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. · ALL DISTRICTS ~oved, seconded, and duly carried: Declaring intent to adopt revenue program and industrial waste discharge requirements That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 74-24, declaring intent to adopt revenue program re financing of Districts' activities and industrial waste discharge rules and regulations which will comply with requirements placed upon the Districts by applicable State and Federal regulations, and adopting implementation schedules therefor. Certified copy of this resolution is ·attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -9- 2/13/74 ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file staff progre~s report on Treatment Plant Construction Projects ALL DISTRICTS Certific2tion of the Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff progress report dated February 6, 1974, on Treatment Plant Construction Projects be received and ordered filed. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: General f·:anat:;er received That the certification of the General and ordered filed Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment, be received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Approval of Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant books Moved, seconded, and duly carried by roll call vote: That the Districts' Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant books be approved for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and th.at the County Audi tor be authorized and directed to pay: Joint Operating Capital Outlay Revolving $156,819.63 297,449.14 $454,268.77 in accordance with the warrants listed on pages "I-1" through· "I-4", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DIST.RICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Receive and file Stop ~ Notice from Foxboro That the Stop Notice submitted by Company re Job· No. P2-20 the Foxboro Company against Mel . Gorham Electric Company, Con.tractor for Power Reliability Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-20,·in the amount of $7,800.19, be received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Review of General Manager's compensation referred to Executive Conunittee Following a discussion regarding a review of the compensation of the Generai Manager, it was then moved, seconded~ and duly carried: That the review of the compensation of the·General Manager be. referred to the Executive Committee for study and reconunendation. DISTRICT 1 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:31 p.m., February 13, 1974. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of warrants That the District's Operating Fund warrant book be approved for signature of the Chairman, and ~ that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $2,794.88 in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II-2", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -10- 2/13/74 DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Adjournment That this meet~ng of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjou~ned~ The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:31 p.m., February 13, 1974. DISTRICT 6 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:31 p.m., February 13, 1974. DISTRICT 11 Receive and file letter from State Parks and Recreation·Department requesting annexation of portion of Balsa Chica State Beach recommendation at the DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the letter from State Department of Parks and Recreation dated January 1974, requesting annexation of 3.55 acres of Bolsa Chica State Beach,. be received, .ordered filed, and referred -to staff for study and regular March meeting of the Board. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of Suspense Fund warrants That the Districts' Suspense Fund warrant book be approved for signature of the Chairman of District No~ 3, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $87,430.75, in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II-1", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of warrants That the District's Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund warrant book be.approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $18,247.28, in accordance with the warrants listed on page "III", attached here-to and made. a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 11 Adjournment .Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:33 p.m~, February 13, 1974. DISTRICT 7 Awarding contract for Diversion Structures, Contract No. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-3E-l Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 74-25-7, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Diversion Structures, Contract No. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-3E-l, to Halopoff & Sons, Inc., in the amount of $25,978.40. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That installation of four house 28, Authorizing jnstallation of four house laterals re Contract No. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-3E-l laterals in connection with construction· of Diversion Structures, Contract No. 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-3E-l, as requested by Robert W. Ross be authorized, upon receipt of $1,200.00 from Mr. Ross for payment of said laterals. -11- 2/13/74 DISTRICT 7 Approving Master·Plan Reimbursement Agreement re Contract No. 7-2D-7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 74-26-7, approving Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement with Irvine Industrial Complex for construction of Jamboree Boulevard Subtrunk No. 2, Reach 54, Contract No. 7-2D-7. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Ordering .annexation of territory to the District (Annexation No. 3b) Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 74-27-7, ordering annexation of approximately 1/2 acre of territory to the District in the vicinity of 10221 Cowan Heights Drive (Annexation No. 36 -Fowler Annexation to County Sanitation District No." 7). Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Authorizing initiation of annexation proceedings re Annexation No. 38 Moved, seconded, ~nd duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 74-28-7, - authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 11.134 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Wendes Road between Santiago Creek and a line northeriy of Santiago Canyon Road (Annexation No. 38 -Tract No. 8149 to County Sanitation District No. 7).. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these rr~nutes. - DISTRICT 7 Progress report re Proposed Annexat~i_o~n~~~~ No. 39 -Irvine Industrial Complex The General Manager called to the Board's attention a report which had ·~ been included in the Directors' agenda meeting folders on the request of Irvine Industrial Complex for annexation of approximately 446 . acres of territory to the District (Proposed Annexation No. 39 - Irvine Industrial Annexation). Mr. Harper pointed out that the report contained two alternate recommendations and suggested that the Board may wish to consider the alternatives at an adjourned· meeting later in the month. DISTRICT 7 Rece1 ve and file Engineer's preliminary report re Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer Moved, s~conded, and duly carried: That the Engineer's preliminary report on construction of Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reaches 10 through 18, be received and ordered filed; and, That the staff be directed to· forward copies of said report to cities through which the facility will be constructed and to request comments on the proposed alignment and report back to the Board. DISTRICT 7 Moved, secbnded, and duly carried: Approval of warrants T~at the District's Operating Fund and Facilities Revolving Fund warrant books be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be .authorized and directed to pay: Operating Fund Facilities Revolving Fund $1,200.00 4,648.95 5,848.95 in accordance with the warrants listed on page ''III", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -12- DISTRICT 7 Adjournment 2/13/74 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to February 26, 1974, at 4:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:41 p.m., February 13, 1974. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Receive and file Draft Environmental Impact Reports That the Draft Environmental Impact Reports be received and ordered filed; and that the staff be directed to file a Notice of Completion in accordance with the Local Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and that March 20, 1974, be established as· the date for which all comments must be received on said Environmental Impact Reports for the following proj.ects: DISTRICT 2 (a) Yorba Lifl:da ·Pump Station and Force Mai.n, Contract No. 2-15 · (b) Kraemer Boulevard Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-16 (c) Palm Drive Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-17 (d) Carbon Canyon Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-18 Status Report on Reach 3 of Santa Ana River The General Manager briefly reviewed the planned Reach 3 of the Santa Ana River Interceptor which will take the project from La Palma Avenue to the Orange County line. This final Interceptor section of the interceptor will cost. approximately $7.3 million, of which $1.3 million will·be District No. 2's share. The project as now proposed reflects the most recent thinking of the Environmental Protection Agency and the State Water Resources Control Board. The Board then entered into a lengthy discussion regarding capacities provided in Reach 3 for District No. 2, and the type of development which·could occur in the future in the Santa Ana Canyon area. The District's consulting engineer advised the Board that the facility has been designed to handle development as presently planned by the County of Orange and includes capacities for District No. 2 and the tributary area presently outside the District's boundary. He also reported to the Board that a joint study of governmental services required in the Canyon area is being conducted by the County and affected cities. The Directors were advised that following completion of the project report and draft Environmental Impact Statement for the final reach of the interceptor, the matter would be considered further by the Board following input from the County and cities. -13- 2/13/74 DISTRICT 2 Approving and authorizing agreement with The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for rie_~ht of way re Contract No. 2-14-2 ~oved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 74-29-2, approving and authorizing execution of agreement with The Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway Company for crossing under railway's right of way in the vicinity of Riverdale and Orange-Oli· Road, in connection with construction of the Santa Ana River ~ Interceptor from Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-2, and authorizing payment of $150 fee. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of. these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Accepting Grant of Easement from Southern California Edison Company re Contract No. 2-14-2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 74-30-2, authorizing acceptance of Grant of Easement from Southern California Edison Company for a permanent easement in connection with construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-2, at no cost to the District. Certified copy of·this resolution is attached hereto and made a· part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Accepting Grant of Easement from Kenneth Isarnu K~bota, et al., re Contract No. 2-14-1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 74-31-2, authorizing acceptance of Grant of Easement from Kenneth Isarnu Kubota, et al . .", for a permanent grant of property relative to construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1; and· authorizin~ execution of a Temporary Working License Agreement in connection with said contr·act, for a total amount of $18, 212. 00, as recommended by the General Counsel. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Accepting Grant of Easement from George and Lisa Saito re Contract No. 2-14-1 .That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 74-32-2, authorizing acceptance of Grant of Easement from George and Lisa Saito, for a permanent grant of property ralative to construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1; .and authorizing execution of a Temporary Working License Agreement in connection with said contract, for a total amount of $3,589.00, as recommended by the General Counsel. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Receive and file letter from Jennings -Halderman -That the letter from Jennings - Hood re annexation of territory Halderman.-Hood dated January 31, 1974, on behalf of Grove Park Construction, Inc. requesting annexation of 7.251 acres of territory to the District in the 'vicinity of Prospect and Collins, be received, ordered filed, and referred to staff for study and recommendation. -14- DISTRICT 2 Receive and file staff progress report re Contracts Nos. 2-14-1 and 2-14-2 2/13/74 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff progress report dated February 6, 1974, on construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, and the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-2, be received an~ ordered filed. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, qnd duly carried: Approval of warrants That the District's Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund warrant book be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $186,276.6-5, in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II-1", attached hereto and made a part· of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Report on tour of Santa Ana River Interceptor Facilities Authority, would be Directors to attend DISTRICT 2 Adjournment The General Manager advised the Directors that a tour of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, jointly sponsored by District No. 2 and the Santa Ana Watershed Planning conducted on Friday, February 15, and urg.ed if possible. • Moved, seconded, and duly carrie'd: That this meeting of the Board of. Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:04 p.m., February 13, 1974. DISTRICT 3 Public hearing re proposed Annexation No. 3E County Sanitation District The Chairman stated that this was the time and place fixed .for a public hearing on proposed · Annexation N6. 3E -Bolsa Ch~ca Road Annexation (Inhabited) to No. 3 and declared the ~earing open. The Secretary then reviewed the proceedings to date concerning the proposed annexation as follows: PURPOSE OF ANNEXATION The purpose of this annexation is to provide public sanitary sewer service for approximately 54 acres of territory proposed to be annexed in the vicinity of the U. S. Naval Ammunition Depot at Bolsa Chica Road and Westminster Avenue. PURPOSE OF HEARING Because the territory proposed to be annexed is presently inhabited, it is necessary to hold this public hearing to determine if there is a majority protest against annexation. This is a result of the developer of the territory failing to annex the area to the District prior to development. If less than 25% of the number·of landowners within territory owning not more than 25% of the assessed valuation of land therein, and less than 25% of the voting powe~ of voters entitled to vote as a result of residing in or owning property within the territory, protest, then following the hearing, the Board may order annexation of the territory. If more than 25% but less than 50% of the number of landowners within the terr·i tory, or more than 25% but less than 50% of the voting power protest, then an election must be held. -15- 2/13/74 If m6re than 50% of the assessed valuation or more than 50% of the voting power protest, then the annexation must be abandoned. ASSESSED VALUATION AND VOTING POWER: Assessed valuation of the territory has been determined to be $2,683,500. Number of voters in the territory has been det°ermined to be 357. IF ANNEXATION FAILS: In the event annexation fails, the Board of Directors on ~anuary 9, 1974, declared their intent to levy a sewer service charge in the amount ·of $10 or more per residential unit per month, to be escalated annually to reflect the increase in sewer construction cost for the Los Angeles metropolitan area as published by the Environmental Protection Agency. TO DATE, THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS HAVE Tii.KEN PLACE: On August 9, 1972, the Board of Directors approved in principle annexation of the·territory subject to payment of the prescribed fees. · · On September 12, 1973, the Board of Directors adopted Resolut·ion No. 73~136-3, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex the territory. On October 31, 1973, the Local Agency Formation Commission adopted Resolution No. 73-176, declaring its findings regarding the proposed annexation, approving said annexation, and directing County Sanitation District No. 3 to proceed with the annexation. On···January 9, 1974, ·the Board of Directors adopted Resolution No. 74-17-3, fixing the time, date and place of hearing, ''-"" providing for notice thereof, and establishing procequres for filing of· written protests. Notice of the hearing has been continuously posted on the District's bulletin board since January 11, 1974. Legal Notice of the hearing was published in the Santa Ana Register on January 21 and '28, 1974. On January 31, 1974, documents were mailed to owners of record within the territory proposed to be annexed, affected cities and ~pecial districts, District No. 3 Directors, and other interested parties, containing the following information: Letter of explanation Brochure explaining the District's function Official Notice of Public Hearing Maps indicating the area to be annexed Copy of Resolution fixing the hearing To date, no written protests have been filed with the Secretary. The Chairman then asked if anyone in the audience wished to be heard or file an oral protest coricerning the proposed annexation~ There being no oral comments or ·protests, the Chairman then declared the public hearing closed. -16- DISTRIC'r 3 Orderins annexati.on of territory to the District TAnnexation No. 38 -Bolsa Chica Road Annexation - Ihhabi tecl) 2/13/74 Following the public hearing, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 74-33-3, ordering annexation of approximately 53.6 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the U. S. Naval Ammunition Depot at Balsa Chica Road and Westminster Avenue (Annexation No. 3E -Balsa Chica F.oad Annexation (Inhabited) to County Sanitation District No. 3. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. · Following ordering of Annexation No. 3E, Director Edwards reviewed the actions of the Midway City Sanitary District concerning said annexation. DISTRICT 3 Receive and file letter from City of Cypress and minute excerpt from City of Stanton re Contract No. 3-20 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the letter from the City of Cypress .dated February 1, 1974, and minute excerpt from City of Stanton, dated January 30, 1974, approving alignment of the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5, 6, 7 and ordered filed. 8,· Contract No. 3-20, be received and DISTRICT 3 Discussion re review of consulting. engineer's services Following a request for a letter concerning the engineering design fees for the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5, 6, 7 and 8, Contract No. 3-20, the District's Chief· Engineer reviewed for the Directors the established fee. The Board thP.n entered into a lengthy discussion concerning the propriety of requesting bids for engineering services on the District's construction projects, during which several Directors expressed the view that it should be a matter of policy to annually review consulting engineers' performance. It was then moved, seconded, and duly. carried: That the staff be direc.ted to prepare a summary report on consulting design engineers' fees for the past five years. for submittal to the Directors. DISTRICT 3 Accepting proposal of Boyle Engineerin~ Corporation re Knott Interceptor, Contract No. 3-20 Moved, s.econded, and duly carried: That the proposal submitted by Boyle Engineering Corporatiqn dated F~bruary 6, 1974, for engineering services in connection with preparation of plans and specifications for the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5, 6, 7 and 8, Contr~ct No. 3-20, be received, ordered filed, and accepted; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be authorized to direct the engineers to proceed with s~id work for a fee of $250,945.00; and, FURTHER MOVED: That payment for additional engineering services and work such as field surveying for plan preparation and .construction staking is hereby authorized to be made at the following rates: Three-man survey party Two-man survey party Licensed surveyor -17- $60/hour 48/hour 22/hour 2/13/74 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Accepting Grant Deed from.Dorothy T. That the Board of Directors adopt Peck Flynn, et al. re Resolution No. 74-34-3, authorizing Contract No. 3-17 acceptance of Grant Deed from Dorothy T. Peck Flynn, et al., for a permanent grant of property relative to construction of the Knott Interceptor, a portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 and 3, Contract No. 3-17, for a total amount of $30,000.00, as ~ recommended by the General Counsel. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part·of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Receive, file, and deny claim of Allstate re Contract No. 3-17 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the claim dated January 31, 1974, in the amount of $139.10, in connection . with construction of the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 and 3, Contract No. 3-17, be received, ordered filed,. and denied, as recommended by the General Counsel. DISTRICT 3 Approving Change Order No. 1 to plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-12-1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Additions to Seal Beach Boulevard Pump Station, Contract No .. 3-12-1, authorizing an extension of 38 calendar days to the contract with Jenkins Construction Company, be approved. Copy of this Change Order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Accepting Contract No. 3-12-1 as complete That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 74-35-3, accepting Additio~s to Seal Beach Boulevard Pump Stationi Contract No. 3-12-1, as complete, and authorizing execution of· a Notice of Completion. Certified copy of this resolutfon is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Receive and file staff progress reports re Contracts Nos. 3-17 and 3-1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff progress reports dated February 6, 1974, on construction of the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 and 3, Contract No. 3-17; and the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contra~t No. 3-18, be received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of warrants That the District's Operating Fund and Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund warrant books be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay: Operating Fund $ 208.69 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 226,295.88 $226,504.57 in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II-1", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -18- -- DISTRICT 3 Adjournment 2/13/7~ ~oved, seconded, and duly carried: That this rreeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:30 p.m., February 13, 1974. -19- WARRANT NO. 22099 22100 221~n ?2102 ~2103 ~21:)4 22105 22106 22107 . 22108 22109 22110 . 22111 22112 22113 22114 22115 22116 22117 22118 22119 22120 22121 22122 22123 22124 22125 22126 ~2127 ~2128 22129 22130 22131 22132 22133 22134 22135 22136 . 22137 t 22138 22139 22140 22141 22142 22143 22144 22145 22146 22147 22148 22149 22150 '2151 ~2152 22153 22154 22155 22156 22157 22158 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Air Conditioning Supply Co., Filters $ Alex Fish Company, Ecological Research All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings, Belts & Fittings Allied Supply Company, Valves American Compressor Co., Compressor Parts American Lock & Supply, Inc., Hardware Ameron Corrosion Control, Cleaners & Protective Coatings Amoco Reinforced Plastics Co., Piping City of Anaheim, Power The Anchor Packing Co., Gaskets Apco Supply, Controls Applied Science Laboratories, Inc., Lab Supplies Associated Concrete Products, Concrete Vaults Assoc. of Metro. Sewerage Agencies, Conf. Registration Fees Bailey Meter Co., Filters Bank of America, Bond & Coupon Collection Barnes Delaney, Conveyor Belt Repair Barney's Hole Digging Service, Inc., Equipment Rental Beckman Instruments, Inc., Lab Supplies Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair Bender Machine, Inc., ·compressor Repair Black & Decker Mfg. Co., Equipment Parts Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Magneto Repair Bristol Park Medical Group, Pre-employment Exams Broadlick Art Supply, Draft~ng Supplies Building News, Inc ... , Technical Manuals C & R Reconditioning Co., Engine & Compressor Repair Cal State Seal Co., Seals Calif. Assoc. of Sanitation Agencies, Membership & Conf. Registration Fees State of California, Public Employees Retirement System, .Actuarial Study John Carollo Engineers, Printing for SWRCB Submittal College Lumber Company, Inc.,· Building Materials Consolidated Electrical Distr.j Electrical Supplies Constructors Supply Co., Tools & Hardware Copeland Motors, Inc., ·Truck Parts Costa Mesa Datsun, Truck Parts County of Orange, Printing Cramer Electronics, Inc., Electronic Supplies Mr. Crane, Crane Rental ~ Crane Packing Co., Dewatering Supplies Crest Leasing, Leased Vehicles Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplies Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies Daily Pilot, Bid Notice P-020 C. R. Davis Supply Co., Hoses & Pump Parts (M0.9-12-73) DeGuelle & Sons Glass Co., Glass Del Chemical Corp., Maintenance Supplies Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling & Concrete Sawing Diesel Control, Engine Repair '. Dollinger Corp., Compressor Parts Ducommun Metals & Supply Co.'· Aluminum Wilber R. Eads, Employee Mileage Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring (MO 12-14-66) Enterprise Printing Co., Printing Erawan Garden Hotel, CASA Workshop Expense Fischer & Porter Co., Telemetering Supplies, Pump Parts & Flowmeter (i~ 7-11-73) William Fox, Ei;1ployec f-Iileage France Products Division, Compressor Repair I-1 AMOUNT 116.55 52.50 817.02 296. 52 144.91 29.86 1,434.17 613.28 47.:)9 58.80 7.14· 99.83 659 .14 65 .. 0:) 134.64 18.43 190.20 320.25 488.20 19.00 328.40 21.53 524.75 51.50 30.07 142.32 565.00 116.05 1,520.0.J 25.00 147~00 180.72 4 ,608. 58 457.69 15.71 "31~45 9 .50 37.42 2,294.13 182 .17 144.50 40.00 48.18 146.72 7.71 3,912.30 11.26 38.89 28i.25 57.90 1,707.45 8:).85 8.70 681.66 2,715.0:) 81Ll7 206.94 3 ~0r.:.: o~ , _.1'-:J. _., 22.5:> 200.00 WARRANT NO. 221~9 22100 22161 22162 22163 22164 22165 22166 22167 22168 22169 22170 22171 22172 22173 22174 22175 22176 22177 22178 22179 . 22180 22181 22182 22183 22184 22185 22186 22187 22188. 22189 22190 22191 22192 22193 22194 22195 22196 22197 22198 22199 22200 22201 22202 22203 22204 22205 22206 22207 22208 22209 22210 22211 22212 22213 22214 22215 22216 22217 22218 22219 2222) 22221 IN FAVOR OF Freeway Machine & Welding Shop, Machining $ City of Fullerton, Water GAF Corporation, Repair Printer Garden Grove Lumber & Cement, Building Materials General Electric Co., Electric Supplies General Electric Supply Co., Electric Supplies General Telenhone Co. Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine (Contract 1-1-73) Goes Lithographing Co., Office Supplies Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Pa~ts Halsted & Hoggan, Inc., Pump Parts Hanson, Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester, Audit Services Hansons Water Works Supply Co., Coupling Hardware Systems Co., Lab Supplies Charles G. Hardy, Inc., Hardware Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting & COD Expenses Harrington Industrial Plastics, Pipe Supplies & Freight Haul Away Containers, Trash Disposal Curtis Hayes, Employee Mileage Hersey Products, Inc., Pump Parts Hertz Car Leasing Division, Leased Vehicles Hilton Inn, AMSA Workshop Expense Honeywell, Inc., Telemetering Supplies & Controls Howard Supply Co., Pipe Supplies, Valves, Tools & Hardware City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Beach Art Gallery, ·Certificate Frame Hydro Products, .Ecological Re search Inland Nut & Bolt Co., Hardware Int'l. Assoc. of Plumbing & Mechanical Officials, Technical Manuals . Int'l. Biophysics Corp., Ecological. Research Int' 1. Business Machines, Mtce . .Agrmt. & Office· Supplies Int'l. Harvester Co., Truck Parts Jet Print, Printing Jones Chemicals, Inc., Ecological Research Edward E. Just, CASA Workshop Expense Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies Keith & Associates, Survey Services Ki~g Bearing, Inc., Bearings, V-Belts & Seals Kirst Pump & Machine Works,. Pump Parts Kleen Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tools, Hdwe. & Equip. Repair. L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Services Lewis Bros. Battery, Batteries Los Angeles Type Founders, Inc., Printing Supplies A. J. Lynch & Company, Hardware Mc Calla Bros. Pump & Drilling, Pump Parts (MO 11-14-73) R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., Tractor Parts Mc Coy Ford Tractor, Tractor Parts John Mc Cullough, Employee Mileage Mc Master-Carr Supply Co., Freight Marine Biological Consultants, Marine Ecology Services Charles Meriam Company, Instrumentation Metropolitan Supply Co., Gauges Moore Products Co., Controls Morgan Equipment Co., Truck & Eq~ipment Parts E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Covers National Chemsearch, Cleaners Ifational Lt~mber & Supply Co., Hardware & Tools Nationwide Papers, Paper City of Newport Beach, Water Newport Skyways, Inc., Charter Flight for Aerial Photos C. Arthur His son, General Counsel Ret.ainer & CASA Workshop Expense I-2 AMOUNT 471.0~ 5.31· 24.50 396.97 138.35 k4 ,,...._,. -" . 3,115~ . 2,840 .. 04 8.65 29.98 374.85 371.25 45.15 137-55 78.34 159 .28 116.44 125.00 18.oo .86.31 56.2.25 109.48 233.71 3,579.96 18.78 12.34 150 .67 276.67 23.94 125 .r"' 36.~ 51.67 54.60 74.84 ·5.20 783.17 328.00 333.22 1, 264 ~80 .... 292. 57 359.29 1, 522 .48' 1,701.63 136.24 41.90;; 36. 54 19,95~.oo 367. TJ 10.57 126.96 16.9J 161.66 109.28 51.41 48.00 241+.~· 297.10 829. 25 47.01 57.44 IL~. 27 36.25 . 1,025.00 WARRANT NO. 22222 22223 22224 22225 22226 22227 ~228 ~229 22230 22231 ·22232 22233 22234 I 22235 22236 22237 22238 22239 22240 22241 22242 22243 22244 22245 22246 22247 22248 22249 22250 22251. :252 ~253 22254 22255 22256 22257 22258 22259 22260 2~261 22262 22263 ' 22264 22265 22266 J 22267 22268 22269 22270 22271 22272 22273 22274 22275 22276 "'-277 ~278 22279 2228:) 22281 22282 22283 22284 IN FAVOR OF Oakite Products, Inc., Cleaner Oda Nursery, Inc., Gardening Supplies Pacific Coast Glass, Truck Repair Pacific Supply Co., Roofing Supplies Pacific Telephone Co. Ron Parker, Employee Mileage Parkwood Western Distr. Center, Building Materials Peat, Maruiclc{ Mitchell & Co., Data Processing Study (MO 9 -12-7 3 J Polaris Battery Co., Batteries Poly Form, Paint · Postmaster, Postage The Lee Potter Company, Inc., Freight Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage Quali~y Building Supply, Building Materials Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal The Rayline Co., Journal Binding The.Register, Employment Ad Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Parts Jack H. Ross, Employee Mileage San Bar, Inc., Ecological Research Supplies Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Rewind & Repair Santa Ana Electronics Co., Electronic Parts AMOUNT 106.26 18 .06· 288.52 39.25 462.41 14.85 5,979.89 91.77 467.03 400.00 8.20 42.66 52.08 40.00 549.78 91.16 1,820.60 33.06 ·71.87 82.94 701.21 Santa-Ana River Basin Section; CWPCA Conf. Registration Fees Sargent. Welch Scientific Co., .Lab Supplies 9.27 114.00 '~27. 39 141. 75 514.12 281.20 Scientific Prod~cts, Lab Supplies Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies A. H. Shipkey, Inc., Truck Tires John Sigler, Employee Mileage Signal Flash Co., Inc., Barricade Rental Fred Sinasek, Employee Mileage Singer Business Machines, Maintenance Agreement Smith Bros. Co., Fabricating So. Cal Forming, Inc., Pump Repair South Orange Supply, Piping Supplies Southern Calif. Edison Co. Southern Calif. Gas Co. Southern Calif. Water Co. Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bo·ttled Water Speed-E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Staggs Worm Farm, Eco.logical Research Supplies Standard Concrete Material,. Inc., Concrete Standard Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline, Oil & Diesel Fuel State Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies Sully Miller Contracting Co., Paving Surveyors Service Co., Survey Supplies & Equip. Repair J. Wayne Sylvester, AMSA Workshop Expense T & H Equipment ~c., Truck Parts Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage 39 Stake & Building Supplies Co., Survey Supplies Title Insurance & Trust, Title Information Union Oil Co., Gasoline Union Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline United Auto Parts, Truck Parts United Reprographics, Inc., Printing Utilities Supply Co., Tools VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies Val vate Associates, Valve Parts & .De·watering Supplies Vaniman Camera, Photo Processing & Supplies John Waples R.S., Odor Consultant Warren & Bailey Co.~ Inc., Hardware 17.25 174.oo 47.10 32.75 . 67 .20 21.00 43.04 38, 241.·55 1,334.50 . 3.00 47.88 565.13 18.90 l59.25 . 1,413.21 339 .15 625.0J 29~.09 12.65 132.50 35.82 19.11 386.00 148.55 1,021.02 915.11 84.26 231.49 105.78 799.39 119 .e2 208.80 260.71 Waulrnsha Engine Servicenter, Inc., Engine Parts & Freight (Resos. 73-l~J,2+1,83) . 18,922.:q Wholesale Electric Co., Electric Supplies 12.60 I-3 ·WARR.ANT NO. 22285 22286 22287 22288 22289 22290 22291 22292 22293 22294 22295 22296 22297 22298 22299 22300 22301 22302 22303 22304 22305 22306 22307 22308 IN FAVOR OF . Wilmington Instrument Co., Inc., Controls Russell Wold, Employee Mileage World Travel Bureau, Inc., Various Mtg. Travel Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage John M. Wright, Employee Mileae;e Xerox Corp., Reproduction Service Everett H. York Co., Filters TOTAL JOINT OPERATING CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Expenses AMOUNT $ 93.33 85.38 831.01 28.74 10.58 933 Jt) 100~ $ 156,819.63 B & J Construction Co., Contractor PW-035 $ 27,805.50 36, 101• .67 8.85 50,980.00 131.86 . 403.76 53,420.65 2,074.46 .3,090.11 876.65 450.00 l,749.30 John Carollo Engrs., Engineering -Plant Construction Daily Pilot, Bid Notices A-070 & A-071 E.T.I. & Kordick, Contractor P2-ll-l & I-8-3· Freedom Newspapers, Bid Notices PW-035 & PW-036 General Radio Company, Test Equipment Hemisphere Constructors, Contractor P2-2I Hinde Engineering Co., Water Recorder James E. Hoagland Co. & Hoagland Engr. Co., Contr. P~-9-1 Howard Supply Co., Lockers · Ronald L. Kolpack, Consultant J-10 Litigation Motorola, Inc., Communication Equipment J. Ray Construction Co., Contractor J-13 Rutan & Tucker, Special Counsel J-10 Litigation Southern Calif. Edison Co., Facilities Relocation I-8-3 Richard Terry & Associates, E.I.R. 73-74 Project F. T. Ziebarth & Ziebarth & Alper, Contractor ~-4-1 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF I-ll 105,136.91 4,910.71 . 1,698.7 1. 2, 500.~ 6,110.00 . $ 29J.? 449 .14 $ 454, 268 .• 77 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 22309 22310 22311 22312 22~3 22314 22315 22.316 22317 22.317A 22317B 22317C Brownyard Structural Steel, Temporary Easement 2-14-1 County of Orange, Compaction Tests 2-14-1 Kasler Corporation & L.H. Woods & Sons, Contractor 2-14-2 Lowry and Associates, Engineering Service 2-15, 2-16, 2-17 and 2-18, Alignment Studies 2-14-3 · City of Orange, Fa.cility Relocation 2-14-1 $ James D. Ray, Hazel M. Ray, H. J. Lorenz, Walter W. Charamza, and Thelma. M. Charamza, Grant of Easement and ·Temporary Working Agreement 2-14-1 . . Safeco Title Insurance, Title Report 2-14-1 Sully Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 2-14-1 Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Testing 2-14-1 The Atchison, Topeka & Santa. Fe Railway Company Right-of-way 2-14-2 Kenneth Isamu Kubota, Right-of-way 2-14-1 George & Lisa Saito, Right-of-way 2-14-1 · AMOUNT. 2,500.00 133.58 7,312.50 15,855.66 3,130.91 5,925.00 15.00 124,737.00 . 4,720.00 150.00 . 18,212.00 3,585.00 $ 186,276.65 22318 22319 22320 22321 2~322 22323 22324 22~?5 DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Orange County Freedom Newspapers, Public Notice Annexation 3-E ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF $ Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Service 3-19, 3-12-1, Preliminary Engineering 3-20, Construction Survey 3-17, 3-18, Design Survey 3-19 $ Jenkin Construction Company, Contractor 3-12-1 Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe T~sting · A. G. Tutor Co., Inc & N. M. Saliba. Co~, Contractor 3-18 DISTRICTS NOS 3 & 11 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF County of Orange, Compaction Tests 3-17 J. F. Shea Co., Inc., Contractor 3-17 Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Testing II-1 $ $ $ 208.69 7,393.75 41, 396 .. 13 3,887.00 173,619.00 226,295.88 119.75 86,934.oo 377.00 87,430.75 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 22326 22327 City of Newport Bea.ch, Connection Fee Collection Hewes Engineering Company, Manhole Repair II-2 AMOUNT $ 314.88 2~480.00 ~ 2,7q4.8R ~ , DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 22328 22329 22.330 22331 22332 22333 Boyle Engineering, Los Alisos Feasibility Study FACILITIES REVOLVING FuND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Preliminary Engineering 7-6-5, · Engineering Service 7-2D-7 $ $ Orange County Freedom Newspapers, ~id Notice 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, 7-3E-l DISTRICT NO. 11 ACCIB~ULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF $ $ Orange County Freedom Newspapers, Bid Notice 11-12 $ Keith & Associates, Engineering Service 11-12, ll-10-2R, Construction Survey 11-12 Kordick & Son, Inc., C~ntractor 11-12 AMOUNT 1,200.00 4,557.50 91.45 42648.95 5,848.95 82.18 15,393.10 2,772.00 $ 18,247.28 III EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT I·1EE'l'IrJG OF THE BOARDS OF DIJ\ECTO~S OF COUNTY SANITATIOIJ DISTRICTS NGS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, OF OR.ANG~ COl.ii~-iY, 0ALJ:J1 \-J!\i~lfi A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Director·s of County Sani ta ti on Districts Nos. 1, 2,. 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California., was held at the hour of 7:3o·p.m., February 13 , l9 7 4 , 1084l~ Ellis Avenue, Fountain · Valley, Califor_nia. The Chainnan of the Joint Administrative Org9.Ilization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District's Board. * * * * * * * * * ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing payment of accumulated compensatory time to Districts' employee Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Counsel's opinion, dated January.22, 1974, regarding· legality of paying overtime to District personnel in lieu of time off, be redeived and ordered filed; and, · · FURTHER MOVED: That paym~nt of 96 hours ($602.25) accumulated compensatory time to Russell D. Wold, Districts·' Construction Inspector, because of severe financial hardship resulting from e~tensive .family medical expenses, be authorized. ·' • STATE OF CALIFORNIA~ SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11; of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 13th day of February 19 74 ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have here l~th da.y of February, 197 4. S-107 '· hand this f the ~oerds of D1rectors· Sanitation Districts Noa. 5, 6,, 7, and .11 CLARK MILLER C. ARTHUR NISSON NELSON KOGLER H. LAWSON M EAO TO: FROM: RE: MILLER. NISSON S KOGLER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2014 NORTH BROADWAY SANTA .4.NA, CALlFOR.N lA 0270G January 22, 1974 Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, . 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 11 C. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel Question of paying overtime in cash in lieu of time off for non-supervisory and management personnel TELEPHONE AREA CODE 714 542-6771 FIL=D In the Office ':)f ~h ~ S·?cretary Countv San1Litir:>n D strict No (\" At the regular meeting January 9, 1974, a question arose as to w~ether or not the Directors could authorize pay- ing a non-supervisory employee in cash rather than compensatory time off. The question specifically· raised was whether or not such authorization would be in fact a gift of public funds. Section 16 of Resolution No. 71-64 is applicable in the situation and it specifically provides that payment for overtime will be made at the same rate at which the employee was employed during the month the overtime service was performed but shall not exceed 24 hours per month for any employee unless specifically authorized by the Boards of Directors. If the Boards of Directors authorize the payment in cash rather than time off, it is a perfectly valid action and there would be no gift of public funds in that the resolution provided this possi- bility at the discretion of the Boards of Directors. · CAN :ac Respectfully submitted, C. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel EXCE RP TS FR OM THE MI NUTES OF TllE RE GU LAH JOIN T ME E TING OF T FJE 1301\ l\DS OF J)IJ~J~CTOR S OF c o u wr Y 81\NITATIO N DI STRI CTS NOS . 1, 2, 3 , 5 , 6, 7 a nd 11, OF ORANGE COU NTY , CALI ~0RN IA A regular joint meeting of the Bo ar ds of Directors o f County Sanitation Di s tricts No s . 1, 2 , · 3, 5, 6, 7, a nd 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7 :30 p .m., February 13 : , 19 74 , 10844 Ellis Avenue , Fountain Valley, Califo:c,n ia. The Cha:irman of the Joint. Adminis trative Organization called the meeting to ord er at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum pres~nt for eac h District 's Boar d. * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 7 Adjournment Moved, sec o nded and duly carried : That this meeting of the Board of Direct0rs of County Sanitation District No . 7 be adjourned to 4:30 p.m., February 2 6 , 197 4 . The Ch a irma n t he n d e cla r ed the meeting s o a dj o urne d at 9:41 p .m., February 1 3 , 1 9 7 4 .·. STA. TE OF CALIFO Ri\f IAl SS . COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J . WAYNE SYLVES'l'E R, Secre tary of each of the Bo a r ds o f Di rec t ors of Count y Sani tation Di s t ri cts Nos . 1, 2 , 3, 5 , 6 , 7 > and 1 1 , of Orange .Cou n ty , Cal if orni a , do he r eby cer t i fy t hat the above · and foreg oing t o b e fu ll, true and correct copy o f minut e entries on meet ing of s a id Boards of Di rectors on th e 1 3 th day o f Februa r y 1974 J 1 4t h IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have he r e un to s/;!;y hand thi s day of Fe b r u ary , 197 4 . ~ o f ,J::,ouf;-t.y S :L ta ti on Di s tricts No.::3 . ~2 , "!§,· 5 , 6, 7 , and 1 1 . S-107 ..