Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1973-10-10
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County San itation Dist rict s of Orange County, California JOINT B.OARD S REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, October 10; 1973 7 :30 p .m. Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Voll ey, Ca lif., 92708 Tel ephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 The following is a brief explanation o f .the more important· non-routine items which appear on t he enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory . Warrant lists are not attache d t o the agenda since they a r e made up imm ediate ly pre- ceding the meeting but will appear i n the .supplemental agenda availab l e at the meeting . · The staff was directed to prepare a report for the Directors · which would give background information concerning the con- struction of the new Ocean o utfa~l by Peter Kiewit Sons ' Company, Inc. Enc losed for the active Direct6ri is a separate report which describes the project , its construction, and numerous. design considerations. Joint Boards Nos. 9 and 10 -Repo rt of the Execut ive Committee and Actions on the Committee 1 s Recommendations·. The Committee met on the evening of Septembe r 25th with Director Kowalski as guest. A written r eport of the meeting, together with recommendations to the Joint Boards , ·is included with this mailing . No . 11 -October 29 Pub l ic Hearing, Regional Zone Conservation Commission Guidelines for Cons truction Permits . We have· been advised that the South Coast Regional Zone Con - servation Commission will hold a publi'C hearing October 29, on proposed guidelines for coastal constructi on permits which not only involve restrictionson land development but also ocean discharge controls. Representatives of the State wate r Resources Control Board have confirmed that the .Commission 1 s proposed guide - lines for ocean discharges exceed those to be established by the Regional Water Quality Control Board and that State and Federal grant monies will not be available for construction of facilities to met?t requirements that exceed those established by the Regional Board . The staf f wi ll re p ort in detail the effect the p r oposed guidelin es wi l l have on o u r Distr icts . I t i s r ecommended that the Distr icts oppose discharge r equ irements that are not con - sistent with the State Wate r Resources Control Board Ocean Plan . No . 1 2 -Design Work fo r Job No . Pl-16 46 MGD Ac t ivated Sl ud e Pl ant • During a r e c ent review of the plans and specifications ·fo r secondary t r eatment faci lit i es for Pl ant No . 1, State and Federal c onstruction g r ant personnel requested .tha t provisions be made fo r Pl ant No . 1 f l ood protection f r om rising wate r s at the southerl y and westerl y perimeters of the Districts' prope r ty . Therefore, we have asked John Carollo Engineers for a design p r oposal to accomplish this . It is the staff 's recommendation that the engineers be authorized to proceed with said work on a pe r diem basis , for an amount not to exceed $10 ,000 . No . 1 3 -Pe r sonnel Matters . · The staff h as begun personne l meet -and -confer sessions wi t h r ep r esentatives of the Orange County Emp l oyees ' Association . We wou l d l ike t o discuss the e mp l oyee s ' r e qu est~·and receive di r ection from the Boards . No . 14 -Consent Calendar . The following agenda items .fall. into this category in accordance with the definition. es tablished by the Boa rds : (a) Stop Notice , Job No . P2 -20 . We have r ece i v e d a stop payment noti.ce from a suppl ie r against the .contractor on Job No . P2 -20 . It is customary that these notices be officially acknow- l edged . (b a nd c) :-Award of Publ.icly...,Bid Equipment . The actions app e aring on .the agenda approve purchase of six electric carts and seven compact -type pickup trucks . We are recorrmending the purchase of this equipment. f rom other than the apparent ·low bidders for reasons explained on the bid tabul ations . (d) Claim of Walter w. Rob inson . The Di s trict s have rec e ived a c l aim from an employee of the contractor on Job No . r -8 -3, which the General Counsel recomm ends that the Boards den{. -2- / District No . 2 / / / I No. 24 -Proposed Annexation of Tract No. 4982. For several years, the District's staff has been corres- ponding with ·the Public Works Department of the City of Orange, attempting to annex an area which was developed as a subdivision in 1963 and annexed to the City of Orange at that time. Through an oversight, the property was never annexed to District No. 2, and now the area consists of 36 separate lo ts with individual owners. The City has submitted a check for $325 to cover the District's processing fees and have asked that the Board waive the annexation fees for this area. The ·1973-74 annexation fees are $3,224 .57 plus any connection charges due under Ordinance No. 203. There are basically three alternatives available to leg.ally 'provide sewe r service for this area: (1) Petition by .the property owners in the area • . -The local sewe ring agency (City of Orange) could . initiate and · circulate a petition requiring signatures of all owners in the area proposing annexation to the District. Upo n receipt of such petition, the annexation could proc eed without the necessity of a public hearing or an election . · The petitioners and/or the City could be responsibl e for the annexation fees and any connection charges due the District. The ·petition could stipulate that the annexation f ees be paid as ad valorem taxes on properties within the proposed annexation area. The taxes could be spread over a five -year period . (2) Proceed with I nhabited Annexation Procedures . The District could proceed with an inhabited annexation which would require a District Boa rd public hearing and if less than 25% of the residents objected to the annexation, it could proceeQ through the Local Agency Formation Commission if the annexation fe es were paid. In the event the protests exceeded 25%, an e lection of the registered voters within the ·proposed annexation area must be h e ld. ( 3) Contract with the City of Orange to Serv·e Areas Outside the District . If annexation to District No. 2 is not desirable or possibl e at this time, the District, with the approval of the other Sani~ation Districts, could contract with the local sewering agency (City of Orange), to provide sewer service on a monthly charg e fee basis . Presently this method -3 - is being used in Di st r ict No. 3 for an area which is curr ently being annexed to the District but at the same time, receiving sewer services . Tract No . 4980 in Orange contains approximately 70 dwelling uni ts . It is suggested that a monthly sewer service charge of $10 per dwelling per mont~ be established . We have asked the Districts' Genera l Counsel to be prepared to advise the Board as to whether or not it would be possible under the existing District regulat i ons to waive annexation fees ·as proposed in the City l s letter dated October 1 . The area has been receiving District sewe r service without payment of any kind for ten years. No . 25 -EPA Grant Approval for Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Contract No . 2 -14-2 . We are p l eased to advise that , after several months ' delay , the ·District has received approval to proceed with the advertising for the construction of the Santa Ana River Int erceptor Sewer from Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue . Bids will be received on November 7th and we contemplate award of the contract at the November Joint Boa rd meeting . Districts Nos . 2 and ·3 No . 26 -Agre ements for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges . The· it e ms appearing on the agenda will f inali ze the agree- ments with the various entities for the collection of sewer connection charges in Districts Nos . 2 and 3 ~ The staff has received complete cooperation from the numerous city personnel involved in arranging these a g re e me nts . District No. 3 No. 31 -Temporary Right of Way,Knott Interceptor, Contract No . 3 -17 . The resolution appear ing in the agenda authorizes the execution of a rental· agreement for temporary c onstruction right of way through a propos ed housing development which will get under way the first part of next year . The developers have agreed to the us e of their property at no cost until December 31 st of this year . However, if our contractor has ·not completed his work prior to January 1, 1974, the District must pay $2 ~000 per month for use of the temporary right of way required beyond -4 - .· December 31st. The tempo rary right of way was provided for in the original plans and specifications, therefore, the District will not have any recourse to the contractor in the event he has n ot completed his work in this area by December 31st. No . 33, A, B, and C, and Item 3~· -Completion of Contract No . 3 -17-1. This contract with McGuire Construction Company for the installation of the Bolsa Re lief line in conjunction with a ·storm drain relief line with the City of Westminster has been satisfactorily completed .and the contractor has c omp lied with the terms and. conditions of the contr~,ct . The staff recommends approval of a small change order authorizing the reduction in the amount of $352.50 and a change order for reducing the engineer's quantities in the amount of $2 ,672. Also included in the agenda material is a change order which ·recommends the granting of a time extension· of 76 calendar days for the reason shovm in the change order . Item No . 34 is .the customary resolution accepting the job as complete and authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion of Work . Noo 35 -Preliminary Report on Construction of Remaining Reaches of Knott Interceptor Sewer •. The District's design engineers have complet ed a preliminary engineering report which is included in .the agenda material . It is recommended that the Board receive this r eport for the com - pletion of the Knott Interc·eptor Trunk Sewer ·System and direct t .he staff, along with the consul ting engineer, to confer with the staffs of the respective cities which are affected by the final portions of the Knott Interceptor System and report back to the Board on the alternate altgnments contained in the re po rt_. In order to meet the needs of the· District and the schedule as set forth by the engineers, the staff will report back .next month with a recommendation for the alignments for ~he balance of the Knott Interceptor Sewer System. After consideration and adoption of the final alignments, the General Manager will then .request concurr ence of this a lignment by the various ci.ty councils of the cities affected. District No. 5 No. 41 -Authorizing Reimbursement Agreement with The Irvine Company for Oversizing the Ba ys ide Drive Trunk Sewer . Pursuant to the action taken by the District Board in December, 1971, a Reimbursement Agreeme nt with The Irvine -5- Company in the amount of $1 09,688 .55 has been prepared for the Board 's consideration. The Reimbursement Ag reement is for oversizing the Bays ide Dr ive Trunk Sewer in the Promontory Po int a r ea . The agr eement provides that no funds be paid The Irvine Company until after completion of the Bays ide Drive Relief Sewer to accommodate t he South Coast Area Deve l opment Plan . No• 42 -Write -Off of a Portion of Bays ide Drive Trunk Sewer . The action appearing on the agenda formally a ba n dons t hat segment of the Bayside Drive Trunk Sewe r which was relocated by The Irvine Company to accommodate thei r Promontory Point development. It is r ecommended . that the value of $16,459 .5 8 be removed from the District's Books of Acc ount . District No . 7 No . 50 -Proposal of Boyl e Engineering f or Pr e liminary Des i gn of the Tustin -Orange Trunk . At t he las t mee ting of the ~oa rds, the Districts' Ch i ef Engineer reviewed the schedule of the remaining 1969 Ma ster Pl an sewer construction proj ect s . We have asked t he District 's engineer to submit ·a proposa l for the preliminary engineering for the next · phase of construction, ~hich is the Tustin -Orange Trunk, Reaches 1 0 thr ough 18 .. · This preliminary engineering work includes t he analysis ot the an.ticipated ultimate flows from the triputary areas , analysis of alternate r oute s, coordiriation of .other utilities , permit requirements, and collection of informat i on and data necessary for the preparation of an Environmental Impact S t a~e ment·. The District 1 s engine er proposes to p r ovide the p relimi- nary design services for a lump sum fee of $17 ,350, and said fee shall be considered a part of the f inal design fee , to be deducted therefrom upon implementat}on of final design except for the expenditures in connection .with the Envi r onmenta l Impact Report work in the amouDt of $4 ,ooo . The total estimated project cost is $1,253,000 . It is the staff's r e commendation that the proposal of Bo yle Engineeri ng Corporation be accepted . District No . 11 No . 57 -Write -Off of a Portion of the Ne wl and Avenue Force Ma i n (Banning Trunk Sewer). . Recently, the Edison Company completed the relocat~on of a portion of the New land Avenue Force Main t h r ough their )r operty to accomm odate the installation of some oil storage tanks at -6- their generating station. The action appearing on the agenda formally abandons that segment of the .force main and reduces the value of the District 's assets by $1 3 ,776 . No. 58 -Environmental Impact Assessment Actions re; Proposed Slate r Avenue Sewer Pump Statio.n Repair, Contract No. ll-l0 -2R . The effect of the actions appearing-on the agenda is t o r eceive and file the Environmental Impact Assessment prepared by the staff and the adoption of a resol ution making a negative declaration as to the effect on the environment of the proposed pump station repair. No . 59 -Rnvironmental Impact Assessment re : Proposed Sanitary Sewer in Slater Avenue ·fr bm Ne wland Avenue to Gothard Street, Cont ract No . 11 -12 . The recomm ended actions app~aring on ·the agenda are in accordance with the Dis trict's local guide lines implementing the Ca lifornia Environmental Quality Act of 1970 p rior t o con-. struction of the Slater Av enue Sewer , Contract No . 11-12 . Resolution No. 73-165 -11 appro~es the plans and specifications for this project and authorizes advertising for bids . -7 - Fred A. Harper General Manage r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DIS~RIC TS FIVE-MILE OCEAN OUTFALL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10 844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 October 5, 1973 The Sanitation Districts' Ocean Outfall No. ~ is actually the fourth outfall to be constructed since 1912 _adjacent to the mouth of the Santa Ana River. The f~rst ocean out~all was a 24-inch pipe constructed in 1912 as a joint venture between the city of Santa Ana a...nd the Southern California Sugar Company. In 1924, the Cities of Anaheim and Santa Ana, plagued by the problems of inland disposal of v.rastewate~, constructed a 42-inch diameter submarine outfall extending some 1500 feet into the ocean. These two cities were later joined by the communities of Fullerton, Placentia, Orange, Buena Park, Garden Grove and La. Habra to form the predece-ssor agency to the Sanitation Districts, the Joint Outfall Sewer, which owned and·operated this second outfall until 1954. , · In April of 1954, the County Sanitation Districts con- structed a 7000-foot long 78-inch outfall.· This. facility, which was thought to be adequate, at that time, until the 1980 1 s,. served the public well and its use preserved the valuable recreationai beaches to the north and south of the Santa Ana River mouth. When i-t. became obvious in the e2.rly 1960 1 s that in less ·than ten years more outfall capacity would be needed, the new Ocean Outfall No. 2 beca11e part of the long-range plan of the seven County Sanitation Districts. In 1962 the Districts established a -reserve fund which \Wuld accu.i11ulate approximately $1 million p·er year for its c_onstruction when ne.eded. This tied in with the over-all Districts' policy of building all joint treatment and disposal facilities on a pay-as-you-go basis. Accordingly, this $ll,OOO,OOO:fl1cility was completely funded without recourse to a bond issue or an increase in the ad valorem tax rateso One major assistance in funding the facility was the commitment in 1968 by the Federal Water Quality Control. Administration (now the Environmental Protection Age:pcy) for a grant of 33% of the construction cost. · · Design studies were conunenced in Fall 1962 and consu~ed a period of eighteen months during which comprehensive data of every known facet of ocean currents, temperatures, sality and other factors were collected and a.nalyz·ed. This project was constructed in t\vo contracts. The -land section which comprised a 30-foot high 336-inch diameter surge tower at Plant No. 2 and 1,500 feet of 120 inch inside diameter reinforced concrete pipe to a new junction box on t5e beach. It was constructed by the Vinnell Corporation in 1966 for $1,118,000. The marine section which the design engineers estimated would cost $15 million was bid on October 1968. There were five bids and they ranged from.$8.9 million to $18.1 million. The successful bidder was Peter Kiewit Sons 1 Company, Richmond,. California. BID TABULATION For: OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 -MARINE SECTION JOB NO. J-10 Date: October 9, 1968 -7:30 p.m. Engineer's Estimate: $15,150,000 Bid Opening BIDDER 1. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. P. O. Box 1512 Richmond, California 94802 2. Healy Ryan Constructors 1400 West 7th Street Long Beach, California 3. Hood-Willamette/Morrison- Knudsen Company, Inc. P. · o. Box 4368 Whittier, _California 90607 4. Western Outfall Constructors 1485 Bayshore Boulevard San Francisco, Calif. 94124 5. Winston-Wattson 301 Clifton Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota 6. J. H. Pomeroy & Co., Inc. 755 Sansome Street San Francisco, California 94111 TOTAL BID $ 8,948,ooo 11,779,000 14,014,ooo 18,095,000 The bid of the apparent low bidder was irregular in that a $50,000 Certified Check was not contained ~n the bid envelope when it was opened. Included in this report is a copy of the Districts' General Counsel's legal opinion on the propriety of opening and accepting the low bid, as well as copies of $everal newspaper accounts of the controversy. ... To: The Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nb13-; ~' ~2-t-s;~·-s-; 6, 7 and 11 Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Re: Bid Opening for Ocean Outfall No. 2 -Job No. J-10 The propriety of opening and reading and the possibility of accepting the bid of Peter Kiewit Son's Co. for·the subject job has been considered, and the -following statement of facts is set forth for the record: The subject bid was received prior to 7:30 p.m. on Octo- . · .. ber 9, 1968. The following irregularities were noted: The bid was .. not enclosed and sealed into the envelope supplied by the District bearing the title o~.the work and the name of the bidder. The bid did contain the information required and was in a sealed envelope. This is an irregularity as noted in GP-2, Section 1 of the Specifi- cations. Additionally, the $50,000-certified or Cashier's check was not contained withi"n the bid envelope when it was subsequently opened at the meeting of October 9. Upon motion duly made and ~ar- ried, the Directors authorized the reading of the bid and the waiv- ing of the irregularities therein for the purpose of reading said bid, and directed tha·t a legal opinion b.e .. obtained as to whether or not the bid could be considered and accepted if it turned out to be the lowest and best bid. Subsequently and in about thirty minutes after the bid was opened arid read, the bidder delivered a $50,006- certified check made payable to County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County. The check had been certified on October 2, 1968, and was drawn on the Omaha National Bank, Omaha, Nebraska, by the bidder. The bid appears to be the low bid among all those received and is regular in all other aspects, and the bid~.,bond accompanying said bid covers the full 10% penalty as specified in the Specifica- tions and is sufficient to comply with this even if the $50,000-chcck was not included. It should be pointed out that this is likewjse true of th~ bid bond of the second low bidder whose bid did comply -1- :: with all specified requirements. The following additional items are considered in this problem.: (1) The District is not obligated to award any bid on the proposed job and may reject all bids if it so desires. (2) The specifications clearly reserve the right to wa~ve any or all irregularities. In the case of Cameron v. City of Escondido, 138 CA(2) 311, the City of Escondido advertised for bids for sewer construction under an Improvement Act of 1911 proceeding. The proposal for bids required that they should be ·accompanied by a certified check pay- able to the city or bond in the amount of 10% of the aggregate proposa·1. At the time the bids were opened, the low bid was found to be accompanied by a personal check in the sum of 10% rather.than a certified check. The day following the opening, the low bidder presented the city with a certified check in the proper amount • • Subsequently the city waived the irregularity and awarded the con- tract to the low bidder •. The lawsuit was brought by.the second low bidder to compel the c~·ty to rescind its action and award the con- tract to him. The court found as follows: (1) That the city was not requi~ed to award the cont+act to any bidder; in other w6rds, it co~ld reject a~l bids. (2) That the city in its advertisement for bids had reserved the.right to•waive any inf~rmality in the bids received." The city cons~dered this along with the rule of law that anyone may waive the advantage of .a law intended solely for his benefit. The court held that the defect-in the· bid was not a juris- dictional defect or invalidity about which the second low bidder could complain where the contract had·been let and the requ~red performance bonds had been supplied by the contractor. It should be noted that the defect in the b~d of Peter Kiewit Son's Co. was more a technicality and ovcrs5ghl than some- thing that had to do with the ·substance.of the bid. The bid bond -2- is merely a bond which will provide a penalty of 10% of the bid price in the event the contractor refus.es to enter into the contract it has bid upon. In the subject ~ase there was a 10%.bid bond in the full amount, and the principal defect was the failure to include the $50,000-certified check as required by the Specifications for the .~roject. The apparent purpose of th~ $50,000-certified check require- ment as a part of.the bid proposal was to insure that financially substantial contractors would be principally concerned with the job. ·It is my opinion that if the Bo~rd desires to waive the two irregularities noted ahoy~, it may legally do so and proceed to award the contract to Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. Re~pectfully submitted c?~~i~·· can hw c. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel .. .. -3- . ~, ..... , ' ............ ~ '• .-. :.•T ,.•·• ,._ ,~..., .,._. ..-r-,.. ........ • ~-_,..,. ---=·~•."'r·.~-.•,. ·-··v·•-.....-..1 t:.-. ·--· ' •• r . . . A12 The REGISTER Frid tty (e) October 11, 1 ~6B ' @y !!!A_n,..mnm l"REE!\JAN ' A chPck for $.i0,000 Ieit in a! and a hunt followed for H. Then Reghter Sf;iff Writer j motel room hy a. bidd('r on t~P the rPprescntati\'e said it n:iust : oce;rn outfall proJflCl to M built have been left in the motel FOUNTAIN VALLEY -A. at the mouth ot the SC1nt.a Ana room. inormally prosaic county sanita-1 River may cost the distr:icts After the othPr hids were tion districts joint board meet-' $2.0 26.000. · rean for $10,974.000: $11,779,000; ing developed Wednesday ni~ht ~hen hids ~ere c.alled on the $14,014.000; . ~16.2.10,000 and hlto a cliff-hanc<er situation with' pro1ect, one stipulatwn wa~ that $18,095,000, ·the hoard moved to . . ~ 0 • • • ; as part of the JO per cent surety hear the KiC'wit bid. more than .,.2 m1lhon at stake. I hond each bidder wa' tn €'nclose. A h lf h ft · -· · · t R: 16 p.m., a a . our a er I a certified check for $~0,000. • the birl-opening began, a Kiewit. This is unu~rnal, district secre-represcntati\·e rared in with the l tary Fred H<!rpcr s<1id, hut with· check. It \ms found to have 1 an engineer's e.stimate of he.en drawn on the Kiewil's $15,J.>O,OOO for the project, the m~in offices bank in Omaha,. districts wantr.d to· insure only; Neb., on Oct. 2. responsihle hidrlf'l'S responded., The board then instructed Tension bl'.'g;rn Wedn~srlay: Nisson to determine if the Kiew- when the second of six bids was it hid could he accepted because opened by board attorney C. i under ce~tain rnnditions bid ir- Arthnr .Nisson Jr. I\isson found reg1ilarities may he waired. th~ ~8,9~::i,r.oo hid from P~tcr. This brought protest.c:; from a l K1ew1t & . Sons Co .• of. Rich- 1 representative of Healy, Ryan! 'mond, Cahf., 11naccompam:d br Constructors of Long Beach; a $50,000 c-her~. He said ~l: whose $10,974.IJOO, bid was more; should be ~et as~de unread. . ·than s2 millinn higher th;rn~ . ~-represc-ntati\·e o( the f11~m Kiewit'~, but hcid remembered· ms1sted the check was there,; to enclose their rheck. 1 The board in.:>tr1.1cted Nisson to come up with an opinion to be prcsent('d at a .~pecial rneet-1 ing to be callrcl \\ithin the next 10 days to decide who is ''the lo.west qualified rcsponsihle bid-1 der." . · . . · '. LOS ANGELES TIMES 10/11/68 ·'·n~-~~"'!"" .. ,.."".·...;·.-~ .. ~-... _·· ..... _.,..._~·· . ·-·~ ...... --... -~-~ · Slipup on Outfall · : Bid Could Cost ~Districts ~2 Million FOtINTAIX Y.\LLEY-A $.)0,000 ' ~ oversight r.ould cost the Orange , . County Sa nit.a ti on Districts S2 mil· ; lion. The money, a performance bond, is represented in a. bid of $S,:H8,000 for a 27,400-foot ocean outfall submitted , by Peter Kiewit Sons Co. of Rich· mond. Their bid '\\·as $2 million le~3 than the second-low offe1· of Healy-Ryan Constructor.~, Inc., of Long Beach which normally would entitle the . Hichmond firm to the contract. But \rheu ::-<1nitation officials be· · gan opening the ~ix bids submitted on the massi\·e 120-inch line Wed· · ne::day, they noted that Kiewit's envelope did not contain a $.j0,000 · ~urety casl1ier's rh~ck as required in : the bidding instruction~. Directors ordered the birl he ~~ct · a5ide without reacting. .After the ·remaining four bids were read-all 'in propet· legal form ~rnd ranging to a hi ~h of $18.0D.J.OOO bv J. II. : Pome-ro\', Inc .. of San Francisc~ . the direwctors called on the district~' ·general 111am3er, Itrcd Harper, to read Kiewit'~. CasMer's ~heck Found After it was read a representative · of Kiewit told the director~ he now had the cashier's C'h('ck which had been found in a motel l'oom. . The check \\'~'{~ submitted for , con~ideration. ~ }~ichard ~mith, prc:-ident of the ~econcl low bidder. Jfraly-Hyan, : ~tron~dy objPcteJ to con.~ideration of . the Kicwjt bid, pointing out that the .. bidder had not fl.Illy complied with · bidding instrlll t ic•n.;; ne.~lecti11g to include the ca~i1icr'::; chf'ck. Sanitatic·n DiAricl ofiirial C. .\r- thm· l\i...7~011 \\'dS nrdc1·rd to make a ~tudy of the b!J.:; and inform director:; wh~n he. v:a~ rc<Id\· tn make a repoi'l. At that tinw ;: :'jJl'ciaJ mf'etin~ of dirrciol'". nf thP di~trict~ ,,.ill l:P tallrd fp1· a\\·anlin~ of a contract. ~ .. The distrkts liopc to dear up t.he . ..... ·-----"'."-............... ~ ...... , BID · · q Continued from First Page-~ bidding muddle. within 10 ', days. I -The outfall, when com· 1 pleted, \Vill attach to an \ already constructed $1.2 1 million land outfall ex-1 tending ·from treatment ; plant No. 2 at Brookhur~t . St. and Pacific Coast High-.~ way . The new outfall will, in·~ ~eneral, parallel tht> old · 78. inch diameter S.000-' foot-long outfall and diff u-: ~er which juts out into the , ocean from Pacific Coa~t Highway near the mouth of the Santa .Ana River in · Huntington Beach. The old outfall will be ; put on· an emergency J standby basis: . . ......... · ·~·,,·· ......... __ ..... ·-··~ SANTA ANA REGISTER 10/15/68 ....... l.A_, ........ ~.~,. A~is~£jid Chedc Starts Biddi~g ConiroverSy i F 0 UN TA IN VALLEY -1· Ryan, however, had remem- 1 . Whether or not a check lying bered to enclose their check. forgotten in a motel room last: When the Kiawit check was week will cost Orange County i found not to be in the envelope, . Sanitation Districts more than i a representative said, "It must $2 million will be determined at I be there." A hunt followed, a:nd a special meeting of the joint i eventually· t h e representative boards of directors at 7:30 p.m. 1 . said it must have been left in Wednesday at the districts' of-. the n.10tel room. fices at 10844 Ellis Avenue. A half-hour after the bid open- At that time, the successful I ing began, ·and ip an electric bidder will be announced on the 1 atmosphere, a Kiewit man multi-million dollar ocean out-I raced in with the check, drawn fall project to be built· at thei on a bank in Omaha, Neb., and mouth of the Santa Ana River. , dated Oct. 2. When bids were opened last 1 The joint boards instructed week on the job, which engi-j' N~sse~ to determine if the Kie- neers estimated would cost. wit bid could be accepted after $15 500 000 it was found one bid-i all, because under certain con- der' P~ter' Kiewit and Sons Co ; ditions bid irregularities may ' ' .,, b . d of Richmond, Calif., had neg-1 e w.a1ve . lected to enclose a cerlified: This brought strong protests . check for $50,000. The check· from the Long Beach firm . . was required to be enclosed i The boards . t~Jd Nissen .to . with the bid as part qf the 10 i d~·aw up an opm1on on the b1d- per cent surety bond. : dmg controversy to be present. Boards' attorney C. Arlhur 1 ed at the special meeting. Nissen Jr. said the bid should! .4 be set aside unread, and ·after' . the other five received were opened and read, the boards in- . structed him to read the Kiewit . bid. . It w a s for $8,848,000 - · $2,026,0-00 less than that of Hea-. ly Ryan ~ons.tructors of Long 1·, Beach, which m turn was 10\ver : than the other four. Healy . . ~ ~ SANTA ANA REGISTER 10/17/68 L~~l·buv:,f all Bid OK Means Big Saving. FOUNTAIN VALLEY -Tax-Kiewit was opened it was found·· payers apparently were saved 1 not to contain a certified check more . than S2 million . Wednes-; for s50 ,OOO required in the speci- day night when a special meet-. . ing of the joint boards of the f1cations as part of the 10 pe~ county sanitation districts voted cent perf~rmance bond. unanimously to accept a bid I A Kiewit representative said from Peter Kiewit Sons Co., it must have been left in . the Richmond, Calif., to construct: motel room, and a half hour the huge ocean outfall sewer at. after bid opening began, a the mouth of the Santa Ana . Kiewit man produced the check. River. i It was drawn on a bank in · The· boards acted on an opin-, Omaha, Neb., and dated Oct. 2. ion by their attorney, C. Az:thur When t'he boards ordered the Nissen, Jr. Kiewit bid read, it was for Still possible, however,. is a· 53,848,000 -$2,026,000 less than la\\'suit against the districts· by! the second low bid from Healy, the second lowest bidder, Hea-Ryan,. which was accompanied ly, Ryan Construdors, of Long by a certified check for SS0,000. Beach. Even if unsr ·cessfu1,: Nissen then was instruded to this could delay the project; determine if the Kiewit bld . from six weeks to ·s:x months,: could be accepted bi:_\cause un- depending on the type suit filed, der certain condition~ bid itreg .. Nissen said. : ularities could be waived. C o n t r o v e r s y arose last: · When Healy, Ryian represent. Wednesday during the opening l atives protested, Nissen was c)f bids on the project. 1 told to draw up an opinion on When the bid submitted by; the bidding controversy. ' * -* I -. * -:_. • ....,_ ........ > * .. • .,~, _j ··: LOS ANGELES TIMES 10/18/68 ,.........:--'·\• c···...-~j •.;'I'" .... ~ ···-~-,._ ........ ,.~ ............ ~.... .·~·~· ... .c-•--,...,~--.,,.·;v:·-·· .. ~·· \ . . ::~ . · .. ---~~· ..... ·~·~ Contract Awarded for ·outfaU ·; De~pite ·Biddin9 lrreg.ularlty HUNTINGTON BEACH-A con-The check and bid bond were ' tract has been awarded to build a required to proteCt: the districts · massive 5-mile-long ocean outfall against default on the contract. : near the mouth of the Santa Ana Nisson told directors that the River her~ despite the company's specifications sent to bidders "clear- failure to comply with bidding in-ly reserve the right to waive any structions. and all irregularities.11 'rhe action will save the Orange "It is my opinion that if the boards : County Sanitation Districts more des.ire to waive the two irregulari~ than $2 million-the diff ercnce be-ties they may legally do so and . tween the bid by Peter Kiewit and a\vard the contract to Peter Kiewit · Sons Co. of Hichmond and the next and Sons." lowest bidder. Attorney James Baldwin, speaking Directors acted '\Vednesday night for second low bidder Healy-R,,·an of after hearing the opinion of attorney Long Beach. protested that approval Arthur ~isson Jr. Federal approval of the Kiewit bid would be preieren- of the bidder's work program ~till is tial treatment-treatment not ac- required. -corded other bidders. He did not Nissan had been asked by direc-challenge ·the action from a legal· tors to oetermine if thC'V could standpoint, however. · approrn the bid of Kiewit at · Fr 1 ~d Harper, general manager of . SS,!J48,000 even though Kiewit had the ")anitation Districts, said the . failed to include a $50,000 cashier's next step '\Vill be to meet With . check required as a performance fed(;1 ,.l representatives of the Water bond. Poll:..:tion Control Association Oct. ;. The check ,-.·as handed to Nissan 28 in Fountain Valley. . ·by a Kiewit representative 30 mi-Purpose of the meeting at Sanita-t nutes after the .bid opening Oct. rl. P.lea~e 'rurn to Page 9, Col •. f ·; ... ~ ...... -....... -•• · .,. ..: . ._ __ •,,,.. .. fl. . , __ < •• _ .. -..... •• ~ •• ·..-1. ,J .•. ; ... , .••• ,._ -~--·· ·-........ _ ..... -· .... ~ 4,, ............. ~-··~ I . l CONTRACT CGntinued from 1''irst Pag-·e tion Districts' headquar- ~ers is to get federal approval of certain Kiewit t r a i.n i n g j o b s on the project, Harper said. "If this approval is giv- en,'' Harper said, 11 v.-e can start construction around· Dec. 1. We have applied for a federal grant of $:3 million, one-third of the p r o j e c t cost, a n d thi.:; sho.uld be forthcomin;. But we can start work before receiving this mu-- riey." Harper said the districts have enough money in reserves to pay for the outfall, second hrtie3t in the Pacific Coast. The 120-inch diameter reinforced concrete outfall will extend into the ocean, closely paralleling the old · 8,000-foot-long, 78-inch di· ameter line. 'fhis line wili be placed on an emergen- cy standby basis ·wheu the · new outfall is completed early -in 1971. Harper said the 27,400- foot-long outfall i3 neces- sary to meet the increased s e w a g e flows for t h e 1 :b~pming county. '. .. A3 The REGISTER Thursday (m) October 31, 1968 · 0 ... ~ Q~. ;;.a, -, .. • ~ ""''·:a··. ~. ij f . •l · 1 ;.... , ~. ' ~\lJJ~U~~ - I ~ r.I C!'\ r'J •~1 l~U ©HlU~ r ~ .FOUNTAIN VALLEY .-A, after the bid-opening began, ~ grant of $3,374,530 to County ! representative brought in the , Sanitation District No. 1 by the l chcc"k. Federal Water Pollution Control; Controversy •arose whethel Administration, a:n agency of! the bid was valid, wilh strona the Department or Interior, was! protest coming from the secoll( an.nounced Wednesday by Rep.: lowest bidder, Healy, Ryan CoTh Richard T. Hanna, D·Anahcim. ! structors of Long Beach, whos~ The grant represents 33 per i bid of $10,974,00-0 was accompa' cent of the estimated $10i226,000: nied by a certified check. required for the huge ocean ; At a special meeting a week ouUall project 1o be built at the 11.ater, Boards Attorney Art.hut mouth of the Santa Ana River. 'J. Nissen Jr., gave an opinion Sanitation District No. 1 ap--·that the districts are not obli· ·plied for the grant as agent for: gated to award any bid on the districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11. : proposed job and may reject all Districts General Manager \ bids if they desire and that the Fred Harper said Wednesday specifications. clearly reserve the estimted $10.226,0-00 cost is the right to waive any and all based on the reduced construe· regularities. tion bid on the project .and · A. lawsuit by Healy, Ryan, includes engineering and inci· against the districts still is pos. dental cost,s. sible. Even if unsuccessful, it Construction is. scheduled to could delay the project from sL~ start after the first of the year,· weeks to six months, depending he said. on the type suit filed, Nissen The remaining 67 per cent said. ·i will be borne by the taxpayers ·-----------· · 1 in the districts concerned in proportion to the districts' own· ership in the outfall, he said. Original engineers' esti.'nate for the project was $15,150,000. When bids were opened at a combined board's meeting Oct. 9 the low bid .of $3,948,000, sulJ.. mitted by Peter Kiewit and Sons Co., of Richmond, Calif., was I not accompanied by a certified check for $50,000 as required in the specifications as part of the 10 per cent performance bond. l ·A Kiewit representative said I the ch~ck had been left i_n a I , motel room and a half ~ur 1 This major ·facility which was completed in July, 1971, is an essential part of the joint treatment works designed to meet the ever-increasing environmental quality standards established by State and Federal regulatory agencies. Current requirements include that bacteriological standards for shell- fish harvest be maintained for 14 miles of coastline from Seal Beach to Corona del Mar. In addition to serving the needs of the current population within the metropolitan area of Orange County, this facility will enable the Sanitation Districts to enter into cooperative agreements with ·several other public entities to eliminate three outfalls presently discharging to the ocean or marine estuaries. This facility also provides a means whereby highly mineralized water from upper Santa Ana River Basin dischargers can be transported· through a closed system for disposal in the ocean thereby protecting the ground water supply of Orange County. ·' PERTINENT DATA Diameter: 120-inch Reinfo~ced.con~rete pipe Material: Length: Total project cost: Capacity: Present peak discharge: Design Engineers: Contractor: Piving inspection: 29,400 feet (~ncluding lan·d secti'on between , the surge tbwer and beach) ~/. $11~000,000 (al~o incl~ding land section constructed earlier under separate contract) 500,000,000 gallons per day ' 190,000,000 gal~~ns per day John Carollo Engineers, Lafayette, California. Peter Kiet·li t Sons' Company, Richmond, California Parker Diving Service, San Pedro, California , CHARACTERISTICS OF SITE The best location for the land section of' the outfali was south- east of and parallel to the 78-inch. Outfall No. ·1. The land section of Outfall No. 2 tenninates in a junction box on the beach. The marine section. starts.at this existing junction box. Final aligmnent chosen for the marine section is one which avoids existing jetties at the mouth of the Santa Ana River while diverging at a slight angle from Outfall No. 1. This aligryment also avoids several ~ -rock reefs which exist about 1,,500 f,'eet offshore and southeast of the existing.outfall. , For the S·i te survey, . the bas·eline for horizontal control exte.nded frorh Newport Pier to the existing junction box at the end of the land section of the outfall. All surve~t coordinates were · determined on the California Lambert Zone 6 grid system.· Horizontal distances were measured with a tellurometer, Vertical control was based'on United States Coast and Geodetic Survey and Orange County precise level berichm~rks. Water level elevations were detennined by means of vertical triangulation and confirmed by simultaneous ~ater level readings on a tide staff at the Newport· Pier. Preliminary submarine topography covered an area of 5~000- foot radius, centered.on the proposed diffuser location. Fathometer profiles were run on ranges about 500 to 750 i'eet apart, with exact locations being detennined at intervals of about 500 feet. Water depths were taken with a Raytheon DE 119B fathometer, while '·1ater level elevations were taken from the tide staff at Newport Pier. A preliminary topographic map was prepared to the scale of one ·inch -equals 500 feet. · ~~· The topographic survey shov1ed the ocean bottom to be very . flat and with few irregularities offshore of elevation minus 33 feet, mean. sea level. Offshore of elevation minus 33 · mean sea level to about elevation minus 225 feet mean sea level the ocean bottom had a seaward· slope of.about 0.5 percent. Inshore of elevation minus 33 feet mean sea level t'he ocean bottom had a seaward slope of about 4.o percent. The bottom profile is affected by annual variations in this reach. The preliminary soils investigation was.made by taking . samples at 15 random locations wj+.hin the area where the diffuser might be located. On the final S)ils investigation, with few exceptions, srunples were taken at in~ervals of 500 feet along the alignment offshore of Station 14+00. Methods used for determining soil conditions were: (1) samples of disturbed and undistrubed materials between ·the bottom surface and four feet below the bottom were·analyzed, (2) surface jar samples were observed and analyzed, (3) jetting into bottom soils to determine hardness, (4) probing the bottom with a metal rod and (5) visual observation. Bo·ctom samples were taken by divers. Disburbed and undistrubed samples were taken by.divers using a coring device. Subsurface samples inshore of Station 39+00 were tak~n in depths to' about 30 feet by means of a rot~ry drill mounted on a small barge which could be jacked up on legs to form a stationary drilling platfonn.· Principal bearing soils along the outfall alignment were found to vary between a sandy silt and a silty sand. In some places these soils are covered by a thin layer (one to six inch) of unconsolidated fluffy material. Thin lenses of clay and layers of conglomerate of varying thicknesses were also found. The conglomerate may m~ke necessary e~cavation more difficult, but may also prevent excessive erosion .. Several lenses of cemented sedimentary material which extend above the surrounding ocean floor, were found southeast of the outfall alignment between Station 16+00 to 21+00, but the alignment chosen avoids them. · ~ The soils investigation led to the conclusion that the. general conditlon of the soils along the chosen alignment is favorable for construction of the outfall. Supporting characteristi1 of the sandy silts and silty sands are excellent. OCEANOLOGY . In order to provide physical data, an intensive program of oceanographic work was performed in the vicinity of the proposed diffuser for one year, from August, 1966 to August, 1967. This :followed about ten years of comprehensive oceanographic work _perfonned·by various agencies which provided baqkground data for · design of the proposed outfall. Temperature ·and salinity measurements led to typical density profiles representative for each month for the outfall diffuser area. Currents were found .to be dire·cted southeast about 45 percent of the time, northwest about 20 percent·of the time, and in all other directions about 35 percent of the time. Average current velocity was found to be o.44 knot at the surface,, and 0.26 knot at 100 feet of depth. BEHAVIOR OF WASTEWATER FIELD . Non-pathogenic colif'onn bacteria are commonly used as an indication of the possible presence of pathogenic bacteria. The coliform bacteria disappearance rate was studied, the para.meter used being T90 , the time. in which a cpncentration of c~lifonn , bacteria is reduced by 90 percent. The TQO was found to be less tnan. seven hours 90 percent of the time for sunsurface test work (up to 40 feet deep), and less thari 3.5 hours 90 percent of the time for surface test work. Current patterns were drawn for each of the. 24-hour runs . for whidh data was available. A study was made as to the probability that the wastewater field would reach the shore from different distances offsho~e on those few days i;·rhen it could possibly surface. Since a determination was made early in the design to maintain a submerged wastewater-field as much of the time as 1vas economically f ?asible, studies were made as to height of rise all.d surfacing of t.1.1e wastewater field. When vrastewater is discharged into the oc;ear1 et.t depths of about 185 feet, as contemplated in this design, and is mixed with the denser l.ayers of ocean-bottom water, the mixture. rises until it meets water having a density equ::i.l to that of the mixture. It was found that :for the average daily peak 1-1/2 hour flows expected in the year 2020, the ocean water density differential between the discharge depth and the surface is great enough through- out the year to hold the wastewater.field below a depth of 50 feet, except possibly for a few days in winter. The studies indicate that it would be possible for the wq.stewater field to come near or to· the surface for a pa.rt of each of thE?se days. During the first few years cf operation of the outfall,· however, at average flows and average ocean conditions, the wastewater field would probably be submerged below the 50-foot depth throughout the year. OUTFALL SIZE, LENGTH A~ID DIFFUSER LOCATION ,. In order to determine the most economical size :for the.proposed outfall, tota.l cost studies were ma.de-., Pour sizes, 96-, 108-, 120~, and 132-inch diameter, were included in the study. It was assumed that the proposed outfall would be put .into service upon its compl.etion, estimated to be by the end of 1970, and that its useful life would be 50 years. - . Power.costs for pumping were balanced against construction costs. Power costs decrease with increasing outfall diameters, whereas outfall construction costs increase with increasing diameters. ~he study indicated that by the accwnulated annual cost method a 120-inch outfall showed the· lowest. total cost, whereas by the present worth method a 108-inch size had the lowest total cost. An outfall o:f 120-inch diamete.r: was chosen because it provides greater capacity thatn the 108-inch size at approximately the same total cost. "The outfall originates at surge tower No. 2 near the outfall booster pump station and projects seaward for 21 400 feet from the exist1ng junction box on the beach in a.nearly straight alignment to the diffuser. It is located so as to avoid Outfall No. 1 the existing flood control channel jetty, submarine reefs, and the Newport Canyon. The decision on length of' outf'all was based on. consideration '-" of the fol~owing factors: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Obtaining enough depth at the point of discharge to .effectively utilize the thennal stratification to produce a submerged wastewater f'ield most of the year; Making travel .. time of the wastewater field from the point of discharge to the shore as large as possible; Staying within the allowable total head available for the system; Obtaining a location where a diffuser of suitable. length could be fitted to the bottom topography;· ·Staying within a 200-foot depth.limit with the diffuser .to avoid construction difficulties and increased diver costs for both construction and subsequent maintenance and inspection of the diffu~er. . Final outfall and diffuser, as designed~ will discharge treated effluent at a centroid distance of about 23,tsOO feet, and a minimum distance of 21,000 feet from shore. Depth of water at point of discharge varies from 173 to 197 feet. DIFFUSER DESIGN The main purpose of a diffuser.is to nisperse the effluent over as wide an area as possible, so as to obtain high dilution \'{ith the receiving waters. A detailed and comprehensive hydraulic ·analysis was maJe on the d~ffuser 1·1ith th;e aid of an IBM 360-lt-4 computer. · .. Basic criteria incorporate.d into the design of the dif'fuser are as follows: · 1. Hydraulic capacity 480 million gallons per day; 2. Minimum low flow -70 million eallons per day; 3. Rise of the diluted wastewater field in the ocean coiumn along diffuser to uniform depth below ocean sur:face; 4. Min:Unum flushing velocity of· two feet per second ~n the diffuser when the end gate is opened. Following a detailed study of three basic·configurations for the outfall diffuser(Y-shaped, L-shaped and straight line), an L-shape was chosen as p·roviding the he st in:\. tial dilution under topographic limitations. The diffuser section starts 2_,100 feet from shore, and consists of an L-shape configuration having two straight legs with an intervening curved section and wilJ be 6,ooo feet long. The location of that section of diffusEr parallel to ~hare (offshore leg of L) was selected so as to give EJ slight · up-slope in the bottom profile toward the outer end, providing improved dif'fuser hyc.lraulics. In additio~, the difference in elevation from one end of'the diffuse·r to th~ other end is limited to 25 feet (166 to 191 feet of water above centerline of ports at mean sea level) in order to provide satisfactory diffuser hydraulics. ~ . Pipe diameters and lengths were chosen so as to produce· a reasonably unifonn velocity profile along the diffuser. Port (discharge openings in side walls of pipe) diameters ·were varied so as to produce a nearly unifonn port discharge along the length of' the diffuser over a wide range of flows and friction ccefficientso Ports were spaced at 24-foot centers along each sjde of the diffuser and ranged. from 2.96 to 4.13 inches in d::..9.meter, with a total of 500 ports. in all (excluding three special p0rts in the end gate· structure). · OUTFALL HYDRAULICS · Hydraulic design of the proposed outfall is based upon an ultimate l-1/2 hour yearly peak flow of 480 million gallons per day. The average daily flow and the average daily 1-1/2 hour peak flow for this ultimate condition were assumed to be 290 and 390 million gallons per day, respectively. The outfall will handle a peak flow of 475 million gallons per day at an asswned "worst" condition, including fouled pipe walls:, represented by Manning's n = 0.0.3 at mean sea level. Capacity of the outfall at a Manning's.n of 0.013 and high tide is 545 million gallons per day. OUTFALL STABILITY · Design of the outfall for stability is based upon provision of .protection from the following (1) erosion and wave-induced . water forces, (2) earthquake forces, (3) thrust forces acting on pipe sections and s.tructur~s, and (4) soils foundation failure. Lateral forces acting upon the outfall itself from its point of emergence from the ocean bottom consist of drag forces and inertial forces created by velocities induced by waves approaching the pipe ~t an angle. The "design v·:aven used is that developed by the consultants from data recorded for an actual storm which occu_rred Septer:iber 15 -25, .1939, which is conside;red the 30-to 50-year stormo The design wave is 28 feet hi-h at the point of breaking breaking denth is 3 feet of \·:ater. Inshore of the breaking depth, the outfall is buried deep . enough for foundation protection ·if erosion should occur resulting in the ocean bottom profile receding to bel'm1 its lowest historical level. In addition to deep burial, the pipe and ballast is con- tained between two continuous walls of steel sheet piles from the shore out to a point where the water is 27 feet deep. Offshore of the breaking depth, sufficient ballast is provided to protect against lateral displacement by storm-caused bottom wave forces and earthquake forces. A study by the .consultants indicates thu.t ·~:12 outfall KilJ. recist .. l=:tcral movement from forc8s resulting from an earthquake of an intensity of 0.1 gravity, with factor of safety between 2 and 3. . . Ballast rock throughout the .entire outfall length ~·1as sized so as .to pennit no move~c~t of 60 pc~cent of a given grad~atic~ at any particular depth as a result of velocities caused by the design wave. A well-graded rock was used to create an. interlocking effect which reduces the amount of movement of individual rock and produces a dense protective material. DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION METHODS 1 r. DESCRIPTI.ON OF CONSTRUCTION METHODS The jobsite for Ocean Outfall No. 2 -Marine Section, was located on the coast of Orange County, California, immediately west of the point of outlet of the Santa Ana River into the Pacific Oce·an. In addition, a pipe storage, lo·ading ?-nd wharf facility was constructed and maintained at the then undeveloped portion of Pier "J" in Long Beach~ The original site area at Pier "Jn. comprised 4.1 acres but due to delays in the placing of pipe, the contractor found it necessary to lease an additional 4.7 acres from the Port of Long Beach to accommodate the seven-hundred and thirty plus pipe which accwnulated. Jobsite prepara,tion was a. task of con·si.dera.ble complexity which the contractor undertook oefore beginning actual construction on the outfall. Following receipt of the last required pennit on January 20, 1969, the Huntington Beach site was gra,ded and shaped to confonn with the requiren\ents f'or construction of haul roads, fences, office trailers, shop trailer, change house, pipe rollways, trestle tracks extens~.on, and track transfer · ·table. Once graded, the area was overlain with an a.pproxirr~·ate· one-foot mixture of road base material and broken asphaltic concrete. A haul road was constructed of ten feet by two feet corrugated steel matting to form a twenty-foot ·~·ride· road\·my. Following location of trailers and installation of temporary fencing, Southern California Edison provided a 225 KVA electrical service. The installed electrical power GOnnection was used to drive equipment which was used for de0atering, air-~atar jetting, p'ipe piling, and sheet piling and trestle construction operations. The Pier "J". Long Beach facility. was construcJ·.ed betNeen the. middle of November, 1969, and the middle of March_, 1970. The facilities constructed were a temporary dolphin ty~e wharf of pipe piling; a stiff leg crane driven by a natural gas burning steam winch which was origj_nally used in the I·rorthwest for logging operations; H-bear;i pipe rollway; and a portable gravel, loading conyeyor. Both the egress and flap~ate structures were also formed and constructed at the Pier '. J" site. · The trestle track over-run, tr~msfer table, and trestle were constructed following se~ting and partially drivlnf:.: of the permanent sheet piling to Station 5+50. The 210 foot tr a.ck over-run behind the transfer table \·ras provided for loading the rock cart, assembly of the Manitowac 3900 crane on the rail carrlage, and assembly of the pipe gantry. The purpose of the transfer table was to provide a passing track. The trestle which eventually extended to Station 20+17 ('bent 68) consisted of an open steel structure supported by sixteen- inch round, three--€i§~ths inch gauge p1pe piling, '·11th t\·1enty-three feet between the two rows of pipe pilih&. Pipe piling was 1 driven to 50 ton bearing with the tips of piling extending. 30 feet below inver~ of the 120-inch outfall des~gn grade at the pile caps, and 20 feet below at intermediate piles and batter piles. Assembly of the trestle was performed from a work platform.- template which was suspended underneath the trestle from rollers on the pile caps, and extending out beyond the end of the trestle in similar fashion to a Bailey bridge launching nose. Each pipe pile was placed in the template slot by the crane and driven to.grade using an air actuated hammer and high pressure air-water jet. The heavy walled jet had clam bucket teeth welded on the end which were used to break up ~nd punch through the various discontinuous l~yers of indurated material encountered •. . Construction of the trestle was accomplished between April 14 and June 18, 1969, with a large portion being done on a two shift basis. Since the trestle had been designed for use on do~ble pipe line systems common to the coastal power generation plants, the pile' caps had to be substantially modified for the single pipe line. In addition, each pip~ pile· had to be fabricated by welding several pieces of pipe piling together to obtain the proper length, which at the end of trestle, e;:ceeded ninety feet. · -. . . Once the trestle was completed, the temporary Z-32 sheet piling~ wall was driven outside the walers between Station 4+25 and Station 14+00. The sheet piling was driven.with a vibratory hammer while jetting with the air-water jet until the precut~length sheet pile extended fmm· the top of the· trestle to a point five feet below plan invert of the outfall. The electI·i·c vibratory hanuner was then modified with an extension "pogo stick" to preclude wave splash· from entering and foulj,.ng the electric motors while alternate pairs of temporary sheet piling were driven down to a pl.us five feet mean sea level to allow.waves to splash through the wall in a manner that forces on the wall.during times .of large swells and seas could be minimized. A dock of seven pipe.piles, changeable hei.ght landing, gang plank, and change house, were constructed one-hundred and t·wenty feet inshore of the End of the trestle so not to interfere with the removal of the last four bents (120 feet) of the trestle. Removal of that portion of the trestle was necessary to allow the pipe placing barge Davy Crockett to move in ·close enough to the last· pipe placed from the trestle. · The temporary sheet piling was removed with the electric vibratory hammer following placement of the last·pipe from the trestle. The contractor was allowed to substitute Z-32 sheet piling. ~ previously used at San Onofre in place of the specified Z-27 sheet piling for the f~rst nine-hundred feet of the fifteen hundred and fifty feet of permanent sheet piling wall. The bc:.lance of the wall was. constructed of Z-27 V-50 used sheet piling. The t~o walls , at twenty-one feet on center were driven in similar p.roc_~_dure ·to the temporary sheet pi~ingJ except that a large box shaped H-beam ·framed template was constructed ~nd placed on the sand along centerline. to maintain the piline; pl.urnb and :ln desired location. The precut lengths of sheet.piling (twenty-five to twen~y-seven feet in length) were driven eleven to twelve feet below invert of outfall plan grade with the electric vibratory harnmer "pogo stick" arrangement. Some dredging was necessary between the temporary sheet piling walls before the permenent piling could be driven to grade because tops did not extend above tne natural san~ line. Considerable problems were.encountered in driving the pennanent sheet piling. · John W. Stang Corporation provided and ·supervised the · installation of fifty-six s?nd screened dewatering> and three piezometer wells between the junctfon box and Station 2+00+ (along the inside of the east permanent sheet piling wall):- These wel~s were jetted to within ~hree feet of the tips - of the permanent sheet piling and spaced at 3.5 feet. These wells did not prove to be.sufficient.to lower the water table to ·a point beneath the invert of the outfall and sixteen additional dewatering and .three piezometer wells were jetted into position during the first week in September before the first pipe could ·be placed. Laying of the first eight pipe> coating of the metal surfaces inside the junction box were all accomplished while the dewatering system was in operation. Excavation for the pipe trench from the trestle was done by a 12 inch hydraulic rotary head dre.dge mounted on a .twelve roller carriage .suspended beneath the pile caps from an H-beam rail system· (Sta. 3+00 to Stat.ion· 20+17). Additional excavation along this reach ·was accomplish ;d by the trestle crane clam bucket, par~icularly outside the·~restle pipe pil~s beyond the end of the .pennanent sheet piling wall where the ocean bottom material would not slough off into the bottom of the trench at a slope as steep as design minimum of four.to one. : The first eighty-four ·pi;e· (Station o+oo to Station 2o+i6) were placed. from the trestle by the forty ton gantry 1-.rhich had seventy-five ton lifting cap·aci ty. '11he pipe which ·was manufactured by Ameron at their plant in South Gate was hauled to the Huntington Beach site by the giant .Aueron front and rear steered pipe trucks. All eighty-four pipe for the trestle section were hauled to the beach site where they were rolled cff onto the sand for storage. Once needed> the pipe was rolled by a large crawler tractor \·1hich had the blade modified with two hard rubber rollers attached to the face of the blade to prevent damage to the pipe> as the pipe 1·ms pushed across the sand and up the rrunp to a position at the trestle that the arch shaped gantry could straddle the pipe. The forty ton hydraulically propelled. gantry which previously had been used 1 to transport sheet and pipe piling, rolled along the twenty- three foot on center trestle tracks with the pipe suspended between the wheel frames on slings in. a similar system to the two arch-shaped carriers used in the ·lwnber industry. Three, rather than two slings on the gantry·allowed positioning the pipe under a pi.le cap by switching supporting slings across the pipe cap. P~pe placing operations on the trestle were.broken down into two separate reaches, that portion in which the pipe was placed in.the dewatered trench (Station.o+oo to Station 1+92) and that portion placed jn the wet.condition (Station 1+92·to Station 20+16). · · . . : After the chloroprene gaskets had been placed on the pipe and both beil and spigot covered with melted _·animal fat cooking shortening to ease making of joint, the pipe was··lowered into the dewatered trench by the gantr-¥. The joining operation was controlled by a pile drivennan sitting .on top of the pipe giving hand signals to the gantry operator. Alignment:. and grade of the· pipe v. ·=re controlled by a surveyor '. with his transit-level clamped to the top .. of the pile cap·. A ~ thin cable cxtendinr; from the center of a pipe trench ·jack stand, positioned dia.gonally in the bell of the pipe with a moveable prepositioned grade indicator attached to the cable was first plumbed with the .aid of the transit cross hairs and· then sited for grade. The gantry operator lifted or lowered the pipe at the surveyor's instruction to ~ttain proper grade. Allowance was provided for approxLmately one and one-half inch settlement of the pipe into the gravel bedding after the_ pipe was released from the gantry. That portion of the outfall ~ipe placement between Station 1+92 and Station 20+16 differed from the preceding procedure only in that the joining of·the pipe was·controlled by a diver on the bottom who, in most cases, felt the pipe together., because visibility most of the time approached zero, due to the surging of the water between the sheet piling walls. The closing of· the joint was attained by an inhaul winch suspended underneath the trestle on a frame pulling a cable attached around the girth of the placed pipe. These pipe placed in the dew~tered trench were pulled together~ using a chain hoist attached between timbers at the end of each pipe and junction box. Gravel bedding was washed under the first eight pipe with a high pressure fire hose after the gravel had been dwnped into the trench by a frontloader tractor. Those.pipe placed between Station 1+92 and Station 20+17 had the gravel bedding washed under the pipe by a diver using a 11 T 11 shaped nozzle on the end of a high pressure fire hose. 'I1he purpose of the "T" shaped nozzle was to counteract thrust. A large rail wheel cart with two cemicircular sho..pcd trucl: hydraulic drnnp beds previously fabricated from railroad tank cars mounted.on the frame_, \'18.S u.sed to trru1sport the gravel bedding to the desired loca~ion on the trestle·: I The ballast stone was placed from-the trestle by a skip box suspended underneatti the gant·ry. The skip box was dumped by lifting one end of the box· and.allowing the stone to fall a maximum of two feet onto and around·the pipe . . Amount of stone was controlled through the use of lead lines as had previously been used to control grade on the pipe trench and amount of bedding gravel around the pipe. Sand was backfilled over the stone from Station 0+00 to Station 3+50, followed by flooding with water to attain ninety 7 five percent of maximum compaction. Between Station 3+50 and Station 20+17, the ocean by natural processes, covered· the· stone with sand. From Station 20+17 to Station 274+00 all construction on · the outfall was achieved from floating plant. Excavation of the trench from Statio"n 20+17 to Station. 70+50 was accomplished with a crane mounted on a 2000 ton barge, using both. a. four yard and a six yard clam bucket. The barge (Jab B) had two three dru.111 deck winches that were used ·for the ~choring system. Excavated material was side cast approximately one-hundred feet in the di~ection of prevaili~g littoral current flow. Control for the excavation was attained through various methods. Alignment 1·m~ provided by a vertical fan Spectra- Physics LT-3 lase·r stationed on the trestle. Horizontal control for excavation of the trench· was P.rovided by the following systems: {l) Horizontal fan Spectra-Physics LT-2 Laser and Honey1:1ell automatic plotting s1·1eeping l~ea.d profiler; ( 2) Lead line with either tide gauge or horizonta.l laser for· datum; (3) Depth lines on the. clam bucket closing line \·J.;_th tide gauge or horizontal laser . reading. Plot plan was de·.rised by the contractor which superimposed predetermined angles which corresponded to stations along the outfall calculated from a.two million candle-power Blitzer flasher unit situated on the Ne1·1port Pier to the vertical fan laser on the trestle, angles from the end of. the Huntington Beach Pier to the vertical fan laser and angles from the nearby Southern California .Edison Generating Plant East stack to the vertical fan laser on thetrestla Station could be located within a six-foot range by measuring the angles with· a sextant and comparing the observed angle to the plot plan. · The contractor modified a 440-foot long World War II vintage Liberty ship, the Davy Crockett, into a·pipe laying barge at their West Coast headquarters in Richmond, Cal:iibrnia. The interior \·ms completely gutted, all superstructures removed, and the complete upper deck cut off: On this remaining hull, the contractor placed a thlck steel deckj_ng, pipe roll ways, a one-hundred -~hirty ton · 1ifting capacity American 305 crane. Three t\w-drum anchor winches were installed on deck for the anchor cable systems. These one and three-quarter inch anchor cables (used in Palm Springs tram cables) extended from·fore, aft and t'he.four quarters on the barge to c:r.-ovm buoys f;rom which a cable and forty feet of anchor· chain extended to a four ton anchor on the Qcean bottom. A small spar buoy a.nd cable were attached directly.to the anchor such that the anchor could be pulled loose and dragged a.cross the bottom. by a tug. Movement of the Davy Crockett was achieved by pulling in on the anchor cables with the anchor winches after the anchors had been moved and allowed to set their flukes. All pipe offshore of pipe No. 84 (Sta.. 20+16) including the egress and flapgate structures were placed. by the Horse between March 26, 1970 t_o January 21, 1971. T:Le Horse is a-large forty- five ton, hydraulically operated, tubular framed, four legged (40 feet on center) apparatus from which 'the· pipe was suspended on a traveling carriage by two two-inch cable slings. All control of the Horse was manipulated from a hydraulic console on the . Davy Crockett 1 s deck with six inch hydraulic hose· bundle extending between the two. The Horse and p±pe·were lowered over the side of the barge by the crane on a twelve part blbck. Once in the water, mpvement of the Horse was directed by the diver who·was either in a hard hat diving suit or in the atmospheric press~re bell which was"attached to.the Horse at Station 103+20. The diver gave instructions over his 1ntercom line to his tender. on the · "'-"' surface. The tender in turn instructed the crane opera.tor, hydraulic console operator,· and air winch opeiators (used to control inshore and offshore position of Horse; spin about lifting cable) on move- ments to be taken, · After the carriage· had been fully retracted to the offshore end of the Horse, the Horse was lowered over the pipeline with the forty fee~ (longitudinal) by thirty-five feet (transverse) on centers pads (feet} straddling about half of the preceding placed pipe. A white 1ine was p~eviously painted around the pipe at the desired forward pad location to assist ~he ~iver in landing the horse in proper orientation to be within the longitudinal travel limits of the· pipe carriage. . Once the Horse wa.s landed in posi tio1~, the Contractor ·diver began to maneuver the pipe for joining with the preceding pipe. With the bell end of the pipe carried high offshore, the pipe are joined ' in a downward rotating manner. Large _forty-two ton hydraulic jacks .in each of the Horse 1 s ·1eds allowed the Horse to position the pipe .at varying vertical angles and heights (within range of ten foot.stroke jacks). This adjustable feature of the Horse legs allo-v.red for compensating for differential settlement on the leg pads, setting on an irregular bottom in the trench area, and distributing load among the legs as required. The carriage from 1vhich the pipe was suspended on cable slings could be moved both longitudinally and laterally. ._,, The joints are closed by a twenty-four ton hydraulic ram from the Horse frame pulling on the carriage. A large beam located on the offshore end of the carriage fitted against the upper bell face of the p~pc, thus forcing the p:Lpe together~ A!1 inhaul cable was at first used (Station 20+17 to Station 111+12) to stabilize the ........ ; .. t' I Horse by preventing sliding across the bottom when the hydraulic ram pulled the pipe together. After much dif,'ficulty with breaking of the cables and jerking of ·the pipe in making joint, the contractor satisfactorily placed short H-beam cleats on the offshore Horse leg pads to replace the inhaul cable. · · Gap measurements and joint pressure tests ·were taken before the pelican hooks holding the pipe slings were released. These tests and measurements ·were attained (3.fter loosening but before the removal of the slings, so that pipe joints could still be removed or adjusted if necessary without a lengthy delay. . The Horse was lifted back to the deck of the barge as soon as the joint was found acceptable and the slings released. The two slings were pulled out from underneath opposite sides of the pipe to prevent rotation of the pipe .. -· · Pipe vms stored aboard th~ pipe laying barge, Davy Crockett, on the forward and aft rollways. Rollways consisted of two H-bemn rails topped \·Ti th an iron bark board. Pipe ~ms transported from · Pier "J" -Long Beach by tug and barge. The forward and aft roll~ ways could store eight and nine one-hun.dred and t\venty-inch pipe respectively at one time. Pipe was rolled down the rollways toward the center of the barge by a .deck winch and cable. At the end of' the rollway, an inclined beam with hydraulically operated jacks allowed the pipe to roll up over a set of hard rubber rollers in.a way that the pipe could be powered into the cradling roller. The rollers allowed the pipe to be turned to a desired position in rotation. On the rollers, the pipe was in place for the Horse to straddle, the slings from the carriage to suspend the pipe, and the joint test hose attached to· the monel tube. · Ba.sic modification had to be taken on the Horse in various rt~aches. Between Station 20+16 and Station 72+00, the Horse '·1as ec ~uipped with a large wishbone shp.ped tremie pipe which was used tu place gravel bedding on either side of the pipe. The tremie pipe pi voted about a point on the Horse to allow the ·gravel to be placed along the full length of the pipe in a long sweeping arc. An extensiop of the tremie pipe extended above the water surf ace to a.cone into which the gravel bedding was dumped. A horseshoe shaped 36 inch-in-diameter atmospheric pressure diving bell was attached to the inshore end· of the pipe carriage of the Horse at Station 103+20. This bell was used for the balance of the length of the outfall construction. The b~ll pennitted the use of the contractor 1 s and in$pectot's divers £or an entire shift as well as eliminating most of the diver physical problems associated with deep water diving. The legs on the Horse were shortened to accommodate the one-hundred eight inch, ninety inch, and seventy- two inch pipe. Special blocking and framing modifications to the carriagewere necessary for placing the three reducers, egress structure, and flapgate structure. The egress structure 1·ms placed on the bottan in thirty-five feet of water, the Hotse placed over, sling connections made to the Horse and the barge"with Horse and str~:icture suspended under water was to\·.red to the placement position. , ·. Rather than going through this elaborate system on the flapgate structure, the cont;ractor reinforced the carriage (weak point) with cable slings to the frame while lifti~g the flapgate structure. The reinforcing slings were cut loose once the struct4re was submerged and under the influence of buoyancy. Aside from,these special preparations, the structures were placed ju~t as any section of pipe. Gravel bedding from Station 20+17 to Station 72+00 was placed under ··the pipe by the previously described wis.hbone tremie assembly that had been mounted on the.Horse. The gravel bedding was transported from Pier "J" -Long Beach to the laying barge by a 2,000 ton barge which was loaded by conveyor from bottom dump grq.vel trucks. The barges were tied off to buoys along the outfall.until needed. A tug which remained on site at all times, moved the gravel barge to the port side of the la.y~ng barge when needed. A four cubic yard front loader was then transferred to the gravel barge to fill the seventeen cubic yard gravel hopper as needed. Having filled the gravel hopper, .the large crane on the Davy Crockett swung the hopper around to the other side of the placing barge a11d allowed the gravel to flow into the cone at the top of the tremie. ·Discharge was controlled by a pnewnatica.lly controlled gate on the hopper. As the gravel flowed down the tremie pipe, a diver positioned on the bottom washed the gravel bedding under the pipe with a high pressure 11 T 11 · noz zled water jet in similar. means to that previously emloyed along the trestle. After considerable experL~entation, the contractor succeeded in perfecting a jet that could be placed at.the ends of the wishbone tremie pipe that \·lould wash the gravel under the pipe. This development greatly reduced the amount of the. diver's work. While the pipe was suspended from the slings of the Horse, grade and alignment could be adjusted. Alignrnent was checked. from a thin calbe clamped to the bell of a pipe while being pulled vertically taunt. Distance was then measured from the vertical fan laser to the cabJ.e to detennine deviation from design. alignment. Grade was determined at the same time by observing the location of the horizontal fan laser intersection on a predetermined elevation grade board on the cable·. Grade was specified to Station 70+00, or the point beyond Station 70+00 or to the point that the pipe completely emerged from the ocean bottom. The pipeline grade ·as placed was slightly lower than plan, therefore the trench was excavated to Station 70+50 .. .. with a gravel bedding transition extending to Station 72+00. ,,,,,_, Through the transition section, the gravel bedding beneath the pipe varied from one foot to only several inches. The contractor used several common methods of plccing the reauired ballast stone to Station 111+12. Most of the stone was pl~ced by the Barge Jan B (previously used for drcd~ing). Barges lo~ded with stcne w~r8 tied to the. port side (east side) of the Jan B where the stone \·.ras picked up with the crane clam. bucket .. to \f , be dropped over center line into the water. The stone went through several feet of water before striking a ·1arge steel pla.te deflector 1·1hich h·ad been suspended in the water behind the Jan B by chains attached to H-bearn.s extending out from the stern. This thirty-six feet long by eleven. feet wide steel plate with three foot high outside steel plate walls along the outside edg~ was usually suspended ten· to fifteen feet above the pipe at an inclined angle of 45 degrees or less a.way from the barge Jan B. As the stone rolled down the inclined pla.te, it struck a three foot high ·wedge shaped. splitter that 1·ms welded to ·the deflector. The rock section was controlled by lead lining at given offset di.stances-from the center line laser (vertical fan) while using the horizontal laser a.s a horizontal .datum. Toes of the stone extended from twenty-one feet to in excess· of twenty-six feet from center line. The contractor constructed a special ~iece .of equipment. · to complete the rockirig for th~ final 15,000 feet of the project. Ballast stone from Station 111+12 to Station 273+96 with only a few exceptions was placed by a 60 feet long 6y 43 feet high by 58 feet wide tubular steel fra~ed sled. The sled was controlled from a hydraulic console aboard the batge Davy Crockett with a hydraulic bW1d1e extending to a quick-disconnect coupling on a round buoy. 'J:lhe hydraulic bundle .continued on to the sled f'rom the buoy. Purpose of the quick-disconnect coupling \·ms to allow the. sled to remain on the bottom ·while the pipe placing barge moved forw~rd to place pipe. 'The tremie pipe which was attached onto the barge by a universal type hinge could be retrac;ted and extended by a cable pulley system from the deck of the barge~ The tremie pipe was stabbed lnto a funnel shaped basket at the too of the sled wj_ th the aid of a diver or TV camera before stone ~ould be fed down the tremie pipe.into a hopper on the S'led. 'Iiwo chutes, one to each side of the pipe, carried stone dnwn to the side of the pipe where the stope was struck off by adjustable height screed. An automatic Honeywell signaling device transmitt?d rtone height within the hopper on ~he sled to the deck console. The s~ed was propelled along the .pipeline.by two crawler tracks on the rear of the sled which were moved by thirty-three-inch stroke positive displacement hydraulic rams engaging cogs. on exterior face of the tracks. Though massive in size, the buoyancy provided by the hollow tub~lar f rrune made the sled relatively light in the water, particularly at the forward end which was supported by two skidso Wooden board facing on steel H-bearyi guides running the length of the sled frame on each side of the pipe, directed the sled along the pipeline. The guides and screeds were adjusted for each change of pipe. size ·and for each change in stone section. ·The flapgate structure was placed on January 21_, 1971,. and the placing of the ballast stone was completed in ~arch. The project was declared operationally complete· and the Districts began using the new· outfall on April 1st of this year. The trestle ,,ms dis- mantled and all construction materials were removed from the Beach site during the early summer. The contract was officially declared complete on July 22, 1971. · BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California ALL DISTRICTS . JOINT BOARDS SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS OCTOBER 10, 1973 -. 7:30 P.M. Post Ottice Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AG£HDA (18) Consideration of roll call vote motion approying Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving warrant books for signature of th~ Chairman of District No. 1, anci a1:lthorizing payment of claims listed on page "I" DISTRICT 2 ( 28) Consideration of mot ion ap.proving warrants. See page "II" DISTRICTS 2 & 7 (29) Consideration of request from City of Orange to serve Tract No. 8149 in District No. 2 through facilities located w·i thin District No. 7. · See page "IV" DISTRICTS 3 & 11 (37) Consideration of mot i on approving suspense fund warrants . See page "II" DISTRICT 3 (38) Consideration of motion approving warrants. See page "II" DISTRICTS 5 & 6 (43) Consideration of motion ~pproving suspense fund warrants.· See page "II" DISTRICT 5 (44) Consideration of motion approving warrants . See page "'II" DISTRICT 7 (52) Considerati o n of motion approving warrants: See page "III" (53) (a) Consideration of standard Resolution No. 73-167-7, ordering annexation of app~oximately 6.8 acres to the District in the vicinity of Santiago Canyon Road and Orange Park Boulevard (Proposed Anne~ation No . 31 - Salem Lutheran Church Annexation to County Sanitation District No . 7) (b) Consid er~tio n of standard Resolution No . 73-168-7, ordering annexation of approximate ly 1/2 acre t o the Di strict in the vi cinity of Clearview Lane and Cowan Hei g hts Drive (Proposed Annexation No. 33 -He r n a nde z Annexation to County Sanitation District No . 7) WARRANT NO. 21242 21243 21244 -.. 245 ~246 21247 21248 ·2'1249 . 21250 2l251 21252 21253 21254 ~21255 21256· 21257 21258 21259 21260 21261 21262 21'263 21264 21265 21266 21267 21268 21269 r.i270 -...-2:1 21272 21273 ... 21274 21275 21276 21277 21278 21279 21280 21281 21282 21283 21284 21285 21286 21287 21288 21289 2129'.) 21291 21292 21293 21294 Pl295 ~296 21297 21298 21299 213'.)'.) 21?.C>l 213'.)'2 213'.)3 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF All Bearing Service, Inc., Bushings, Seals & Bearings American Lock & Supply, Inc., Hardware City of Anaheim, Power Analytical Research Laboratories, Sample Analysis Artemis Distributors, Cleaner Bearing Specialty Company, Bearings John G. Bell Company, Valves Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair Bird-X, Inc., Ultrasonic Reoeller Blower Paper Company, Operating Supplies Don Bogart, Employee Mileage Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Magneto Repair Brenne~-Fiedler & Assoc., Inc., Comp~essor Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams Bruning Division, Drafting Equipment $ Business & Institutional Furniture Co., Office Equipment Cal Glass for Research, Inc., Ecological ~esearch Supplies Cal State Seal Company, Seals California Auto Collision, Inc4, Truck Repair California Collator Sales, Office Supplies T. V. Carter Co., Equipment Repair Brian Chuchua's, Truck Parts . Coast Insurance Agency, Liability Insurance Premiums College Lumber Company, Inc., Building Materials Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electrical Supplies Constructors Supply Company, Hardware Paul Cooper, Grit Removal (3 Months Net) Copeland Motors, Inc., Truck· Parts County of Orange, Printing Mr. Crane, Crane Rental R. J. Currie, Employee Mileage Crest Leasing Corp., Leased Vehicles Daily Pilot, Bid Notice E-070 & E-071 Datacraft, Inc., Equipment Rental C. R. Davis Supply Co., Equipment P~rts De Guelle & Sons Glass Co., Glass Del Monte/Mark Thomas Hyatt Hous~, CASA Conferenc Expense Department of Governmental Services,. Highway Specs Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling Dominguez Marine & Industrial Supply Co., Valves Don's Lawnmower. Shop, Equipment Parts Dutch Stark Company, Equipment Parts Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies & Forms Electronic Business Machines, Office Equipment Eliffs Art Shop, M9P Supplies Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring (MO 12~14-66) Engine & Compressor Supply Co., Sales Tax Envirotech Corp., ·Pump Parts FMC Corporation, Shaker & Conveyor Parts Fibre Glass Evercoat Co., Inc., Maintenance Supplies AMOUNT 332.75 206.49 26.34 127.0'.) 211.16 230.67 1,112.95 78. '.)0. l~a.96 43.88 38 .10 523.10 436.82 50.00 95.12 102.00 520.46 149.23 81.80 17.81 90.00 4.70 13,811.00 100.69 · 115. 52 259. 73 2,872.04 94.98 26.50 685 .88 l~). 5'.) 147.28 8.85 35.00 205.19 25 .. 93 5.JO 6.06 129.75 829.95 23.69 64.12 869.'.)8 83.'J5 181.26 2,355.'.)') 6.25 158.32 l,OD3.64 127.88 Robert Finnell, Secondary Treatment Meeting Exp .• (MO 4-11-73) Fischer & Borter Company, Telemetering Supplies 25.00 582.10 2·J4. 34 46.50 5.94 22'"{ .90 2,122.81 6,689.88 Fisher Controls Company, Compressor Parts France Products, Gaskets City of Fullerton, Water . Garden Gro7e Lumber & Cement Co., Building Materials General Telephone Company Georgia Pacific, Chlorine (Cont.· 1-1-73) Golden State Freight Service, Freight M. E. Gray Company, Engine Parts G: ... aybar Electric Company, Inc., Electric Supplies Halopoff & Sons, Inc., Raise Manhole I-1 6.15 155.79 l~J4.J8 125.'.)0 WARRANT NO. 213:::>4 ·213:::>5 21306 21J07 21308 3'.J9 ~31J 21311 21312· 21313 21314 21315 21316 21317 21318 '121319 2132'.) 21321 21322. 21323 21324 21325 21326 21327 21328 21329 2133J 21331 21332 21333 r-?34 .) ~35 21336 21337. 21338 21339 . 213l~-J 21341 21342 21343 21344 21345 21346 21347 21348 213L+9 21350 21351 21352 21353 23154 21355 21356 21357 21358 "'1 ?C::9 ~./ ~360 21361 21~62 21363 21364 21365 21366 21 ':1.67 21368 IN FAVOR OF Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting & COD Expenses Haul Away Containers, Trash Disposal Hertz Car Leasing Corp., Leased Vehicle Hewlett Packard, Equipment Repair Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies Hundley Company, Inc., Controls Pam Huffman, Employee Mileage City of Huntington Beach, Water Inland Nut & Bolt Co., Hardware International Business Machines, Office Supplies International Harvester Co., Truck Parts Jensen Instrument Co., Controls Kahl Scientific Instrument Corp., Equipment Repair Kelly Pipe Company, Pipe Supplies Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supplies King Bearing, Inc., Seals, Bearings, & V-Belts Kleen-Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware · LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tool Repair & Equip. Parts L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Rental Larsen-Hogue, Electrical Starter Parts Lawless Detroit Diesel, Equipment Parts Judy Lee, Employee Mileage Lewis Bros. Battery, Batteries $ ·AMOUNT 193.81 150.00 795 .66 53.08 1,546.47 242.75 19.20 8.88 592. 35 38.16 20.23 485.21 241.15 1;625.02 1,335.88 265. '.)2 397.89 107.23 606.00 2,151.:::>7 1,114.78 14.71 27.30 52.89 Kris Lindstrom, Secondary Treatment Meeting Exp. (M0·4-ll-73) Los Angeles Chemical Co., Chemicals 53.15 784.40 R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., Paving Materials John M. McCullough, Employee Mileage Larry W. McLemore, Employee Mileage Mc Master-Carr, Hardware . Majestic Fasteners Company, Hardware John B. Moore Corp., Solvent Morgan Equipmerit Co., Truck Parts J. Mosher, Employee Mileage Nale~ Chemical Co., Clean~rs Nates Saw & Lawnmower Shdp, Saw Repair National Lumber & Supply Inc., Building Materi·als Newark Electroincs, Electric Supplies City of Newport Beach, Water Newport Supply Co., Hardware c. Arthur Nissan, Gen'l. Counsel Retainer & Qtrly. Chgs. Noland Paper Company, Reproduction Paper Occidental College, Marine Ecology Trawl Orange County Radiotelephone, P~ge Rental Osterbauer Compressor Service, Compressor Parts Orange County Hater Works, Water Pacific Scientific Co., Transmitter Pacific Telephone Co. Ron Parker, Employee Mileage Pneumatic Machinery Co., Compressor Parts Postmaster, Postage. The Lee Potter Company, Inc., Maintenance Supplies Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Steel The Riley Co., Electric Supplies Jack H. Ross, Employee Mileage Rowland Signs, Signs S & J Chevrolet, Truck Parts . Sand Dollar BtJ.siness Forms, Printing . Santa A~a Blue Print Co., Printing Santa Ana Book Store, Inc., Manuals Sa~ta Ana Electric Motors, Motor Rewind Scientific Prod'..-:cts, Lab ·Supplies City of Seal Beach, Water I-2 116.6:::> 82.74 33.06 78 .3:::> ·8.87 26.61 200.11 19 .8·::> 368.22 18 .:JO 135.66 22.89 14.54 65. 77 1,508.50 219.71 375.'.)) 24.77 71.37 23.98 419.25 462.42 9.90 34.97 4C)'.). O::> 145.58 47.22 4:::>.00 1,067.28 316.28 53.82 2J.'.)0 31.60 131.68 51.77 51.63 4J5 .85 158.20 21~614 WARR.ANT NO. 21369 . 21370 21371 21372 21373 '""' 374 .c375 21376 21377 21378 21379 2138J 21381 21382 21383 2.J-384 21385 21386 21387 21388 21389 21390 21391 21392 21393 21394 21395 21396 21397 21398 '"'"'399 w.t400 214.01 21402 21403 21404 21485 21406 21407 21408 21409 21410 21411 IN F.AVOR OF Seal Black, Inc., Paving Materials $ Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies John Sigler, Employee Mileage Signal Flash Company, Inc., Barricade Rental South Orange Sup~ly, Hardware Southern California Edison Southern California Gas Company Southern California Water Co. South-:J11est Processors, 011 Disposal & Removal Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water Speed-E .Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Concrete Materials, Concrete Standard Oil Co., Gasoline State Compensation Insurance Fund, Workmans Comp. Premium Sully Miller Contracting Co., Paving Materials Surveyors Service~Co., Survey Equipment. T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Parts Tiernan's Office Equipment, Adder Repair Title Insurance & Trust Co., Title Report Tony's Building Materials, Inc., Building Materials Transport Clearings, Freight Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Steel Tubesales, Tubing J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Fan Union Oil Company, Gasoline Union Oil Company, Gasoline United .Auto Parts, Truck Parts Utilities Supply Co., Tools & Hardware VWR Scientific, Equipment Repair & Lab Supplies Vaniman Camera, Photo Supplies & Processing· Garland A. Walsh, Tools · Ward & Harrington, Building Materials Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc., Engine Parts Robert A~ Webber, Employee·Mileage Western Salt Company, Salt · Western Fastener Company, ·Hard.ware Russ Wold, Employee Mileage World Travel Bureau, Inc., Various Mtg. Travel Expenses Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage James Wybenga, Employe.e Mileage Xerox Corp., Reproduction Services Zep Manufacturing Co., Janitorial Supplies Zodiac Paper Co., Reproduction Supplies .AMOUNT 28.36 428.35 62.22 15.75 48.30 32,123.50 690.83 3.21 1,130.36 80.55 242.13 160.82 237.59 18,325.02 165 .69 72.61 24.80 19.50 75.00 174.90 61.61 387.57 363 .82 302.10 1,257.64 72.77 429.38 1,406.92 271.66 89.84 33.54 348.91 1,188.43 36.9:> 97.12 449.24 22.20 1,575.99 53.46 23. TO 848.:>o 61.59 116.39 TOT.AL JOINT OPERATING $ 123,231.12 I-3 WARRANT NO. 21412 21413 21414 415 M416 21417 ,' 2i!H8 21419 21420 21421 2i422 21423 21424 . '· 211+25 ·211-i26 21427 21428 21429 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Bruning Division, Drarting Equipment $ John Carollo Engineers, Engineering-Plant Constr. Constructors Supply Co., Machine Equipment & Tools Daily Pilot,.Bid Notices A-068 & A-069 Carlos L. Doyle, Operations Consultant Pl-16 E.T.I. & Kordick, Contractors I-8-3 & P2-ll-l Fischer & Porter Co., Flow Meter Grillias, Pirc, Rosier & Alves,. Arch. Serv. Pl-16 Lloyd D. Hedenland, Operations Consultant Pl-16 Hemispher.e Constructors, Contractor P2-21 James E. Hoagland Co. & Hoagland Engr. Co., Contr. Pl-9-1 LBWS, Inc., Welding Tools J. Ray Construction Company, Contractor J-13 Rutan & Tucker, .Special Counsel -J-1~ Litigation J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Fan Twining Laboratories, Testing J-13, P2-21 & I-8-3 United Reprographics, Inc., Printing F. T. Ziebarth & Ziebarth & Alper, Contractor J-4-1 AMOUNT 500.08 66,357.79 6 ~~ ~9 ~..-' . ..-' 8.JJ 4~C>.00 89,495.5~ 218~39 4,013.74 312.0~ 77,513.94 86,lc->:>.OO 181.79 66,905.3:) 1,236.73 . 819. 38 352.80 243.57 24,44:>.JJ TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING .$ 419' 754 .60 TOTAL JOINT OPERARING & CORF $ 542,985.72 I-4 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO: IN FAVOR OF 21430 21431 21432 21''~3 21.._,4 21435 21436 21437 21438 21439 21440· 21441 21442 21443 21444 21445 County of Orange, Compaction Test 2-14-1 Lowry and Associates, Engineering Design and Survey 2-15, Construction Survey 2-14-1 San Diego Pipeline Co., Permanent Easement 2-14-2 Sully Miller Contracting Co., Contractor 2-14-1 Twining Laboratories, Pipe Testing 2-14-1 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering 3-17-1, Preliminary Engineering 3-20, 3-21, & Construction Survey 3-17, 3-17-1, 3-18 County of Orange, Compaction Test 3-·17-=1, Excavation Permit 3-18 McGuire Construction, Contractor 3-17-1 A. G~ Tutor Co., Inc & N. M. Saliba Co., Contractor 3-18 Twining Laboratories, Pipe Tes.ting 3-17-1 DISTRICTS NOS 3 & 11 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF County of -Orange, Compaction Test 3-17 City·of Fountain Valley, Street Striping 3-17 J. F. Shea Co., Inc., Contractor 3-17 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF City of Newport Beach, Connection Fee Collection DISTRICTS NOS 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Shuirman Simpson, Engineering and Construction Survey 5-19 A. G. Tutor Co., Inc & N. M. Saliba Co., Contractor 5-19 -II- $ $ AMOUNT 127.81 34,066.90 3,500.00 677,895.00 13.90 715,603:61 14,905.25 234.39 17,608.55 6,507.00 41.70 $ 39,296.89 $ 119.03 730.59 347,210.00 $ 348,059.62 4,913.50 50,092.41 55,005.91 WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 21446 21447 State of California, Annexation Processing Fee, Annexation No. 31 State of California, Annexation Processing Fee, Annexation Noo 33 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 21448 Bo-Mar Construction Compan~, Contractor 7-5-lR -III- $ $ AMOUNT 70.00 70.00 140.00 45,666.12 $ 45,806.12 cDty of incorporated 1888 orange civic center· 300 east chapman avenue· orange,. califomia 92666 post office box 449 department of public works engineering division (714) 532-0444 August 27, 1973 County Sanitation District County of Orange · P ."o. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 . Attention: Mr. Ray Lewis Chief Engineer Regarding: Tract #8149 Dear Mr. Lewis: It has been brought to our attention by Mr. Bruce Witcher of your office that Tract #8149, which is presently developing within .the City of Orange, is'proposed to be sewered by extending the just completed Santiago Canyon Road Sewer into the Tract. A problem is created according to Mr. Witcher because the Santiago Canyon Road Sewer is in District #7 and Tract #8149 is in District #2. We were, frankly, unaware of the difference in the two ju~isdictions until it was called to our attention, however when we submitted our plans to your office for review, we showed this area· draining into the District #7 . li'1e. Since physical terrain dictates for the most part how the land is sewered, I don't believe that the area south of the Santiago Creek can be sewered from District #2 lines. -A gravity flow system would be difficult if not impossible and a force main system may be required. At the time we submitted our plans for your review .of the Santiago Canyon Road Sewer, we recognized this problem and showed the area in question to be directed toward our new District #2 sewer. AGENDA ITEM #29 IV-1 r·• ··~ In .. ho r·····'.~;~ ','":,· ·;~:,.:. ".:",-, .... r'"'·tary . C~u~~·:·· .·· ... · · ;~ ·,:..-;~;:.:t Ne~··°/. · ··----- \. £..;...·~r.-.. ·~ ..... -.• · ... · ... _.·_· .. ~ DISTRICTS 2 & 7 Mr. Ray Lewis Page 2 August 27, 1973 We received no adverse connnents from your office and assumed that our Sewer Hydrology Study was acceptable. If this land cannot be sewered as proposed it could only be serviced by constructing a new line along the north side of the Santiago Creek begin- ning at our existing sewer located at Sycamore and Serrano Avenue, a distance of approximately 2 miles. In light of problems in crossing the creek, I would suggest that this area be deannexed from District #2 and included into District #7. It appears that this should have been done when the Districts were originally establish- ed. If this is unfeasible, I would appreciate further meeting with you to discuss the problem since the tract was approved_ and is being constructed with the intent of sewering into our Santiago Canyon Road Sewer. We look forward to meeting with you at .an early date to resolve this issue. ·zou s vera ru y' rt~'( j I ~M~.-J ~ryj . J_~o nson Ci t1 J ng.1 eer GDJ:rh AGENDA ITEM #29 IV-2 DISTRICTS 2 & 7 -· ···- RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS October lO, 1973 -7:30 p.m. ·. t Copy: JWS for agenda Attention: Mr. Ray Lewis JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS PHOENIX ARIZONA WALNUT CREEK CALIFORNIA SANTA ANA CALIFORNIA JOHN A. CAROLLO, P.E. < 1906-1971 > H. HARVEY HUNT, P.E. HOWARD M. WAY, P.E. ROBERT G. WILLIAMS, P.E. WALNUT CREEK PLAZA, SUITE 750 1990 NORTH CALIFORNIA BLVD. WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94596 AREA CODE: <415> 932-1710 DONALD R. PREISLER, P.E. GAIL P. LYNCH, P.E. September.26, 1973 Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange· County P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: 46-MGD Activated Sludge Plant at Reclamation Plant No. 1 - P 1-16 This letter is our proposal to perform certain engineering work requested by the Districts that" is beyoncl the scope of our original Contract for the subject project. This additional work would be performed in accordance vnth the proVisions of our Con- tract and consists of the following: · Design of landscaping, irrigation system, block wall along Garfield Avenue, Ward Street improvements, and earth berm. along Ward Street. The additional fee for this work will not exceed $IO, 000. Very truly yours, HHH:kp AGENDA ITEM #12 -A-.. ALL DISTRICTS B I D TABULATION S H E E T Date October 3, 1973 11:00 a.m. Contract For: Six (6) 4-Wheel Electric Carts Specification No. A-068 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Dutch Stark Company $9_,615.80 18217 Anninta Street Reseda_, California 2. _ Tayl'or-Dunn $9_,678.00 * Anaheim 3. Westinghouse Corporation $9_,819.10 Redlands * It is recommended that the award be made to Taylor-Dunn, the second low bidder, in the amount of $9,678.00, for the reasons set forth below. Unit bid by low bidder does not meet specifications in the following areas: Specification Bid 1. Horsepower 3.5 2 2. Drive Chain in oil bath Direct 3. Wheel base 55-inch 63-inch wn~· W. N. Clarke Maintenance Superintendent AGENDA ITEM #14(b) .-B-ALL DISTRrcrrs BID TABULATION SHEET Date October 3, 1973 11:00 a.m. Contract For: Seven (7) Compact Type Pick-up Tru·cks Specification No. A-069 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Cone Chevrolet $16,977.50 600 w. Commonwealth Fullerton, California 2. Costa Mesa Datsun $17' 847. 50 * Costa Mesa, California 3. Peck Ford No Bid Whittier, California 4. Anaheim Dodge No Bid • Anaheim, California 5 •. McCoy Ford No Bid Anaheim, California * It is recommended that the award be made· to Costa Mesa Datsun, the second low b~dder, in the amount of $17,847.50 for the reason set forth below. Units bid by the low 'bidder do not meet the specifications in that the transmission specified by Cone Chevrolet is not satisfactory to the Districts. There were 22 proposals mailed out and the five listed above were the only bidders. W?1·~ W. N. Clarke Maintenance Superintendent AGENDA ITEM #14(c) -C-ALL DIS 1rRIC 1rs PROGRESS REPORT TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (71-4) 962-2411 P2-11-1 -HEADWORKS "C" EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2 -($1,261,693) NEW MAIN SEWAGE PU~1PS: Both uni ts operational. NEW BAR SCREENS: New bar screens and drives are operational. NEW GRIT CHAMBERS: In service. Repair work is required on concrete. Grit auger has been removed for remedial work. NEW METER VAULT: In service. FOUL· AIR SCRUBBER: Operational. Gener~l contractor has been given a list of items ~equired to complete the work at Headworks "C". ~REHABILITATION OF IIEADWORKS "B": Not scheduled to start until all new facets of Headworks "C" are operational. Contract approximately 95 percent. complete to date. 1-8-3 -iNFLUENT METERING AND DIVERSION STRUCTURE -($1,485,679) INFLUENf CHANNEL: 95% constructed. No connection can be made until main s~~ucturc is completed. INFLUENT PIPING: Sunflower, Santa Ana, Euclid and Interplant Trunks extended to structure. Euclid and Sun~lower Trunk bypasses in service. No conne~tions can be made until structure is completed. METERING AND DIVERSION STRUCTURE: . Forming and pouring roof decks. Installing sluice gates and meter tapers. Laying utility piping. Contract approximately 59 percent complete to date. P2-20 -POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT PLANT NO. 2 -($158,294) No further work is expected until al~.equipment has been df livercd • ._,,Contract approximately 14 percent complete to date. AGENDA ITEM #16 D-1 ALL DISTRICTS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 Progress Report Treatment Plant Projects .Page Two Pl-9-1 -ADDITIONAL SECONDARY TREATI·IENT AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 - (~814,943) ~ DIGESTER GAS CO~lPRESSOR: Delivered and installed. NEW INCINERATOR, CONVEYOR AND JW.'fS: Incinerator complete. Conveyor and one new hydraulic ram table installed~ Completing new flame safety and burner control system for both incinerators. PLANT WATER PUMP STATION: Structure complete with disc water screen installed. Tunnel piping and service to headworks complete. TRICKLING FILTER: Distributor being installed. CITY WELL WATER PUMP STATION: Tanks, pipi~g and pumps complete. tontrol components required to make Station operational on City water. NEW WELL: Well pump installed and tested. Contract approximately 89 percent complete to date. P2-21 -DIGESTERS '.'N'.' AND '.'O'.' AT .PLANT NO. 2 -($1,076,514) DIGESTElS "N" AND "O": Digesters essentially structurally complete. DIGESTER CONTROL BUILDING: aeck. Forming and pouring base, lower walls and. . . TUNNELS: Completing forming and pouring of concrete walls and decks. DIGESTER GAS cmIPRESSORS: Equipment delivered. STORM WATER PUMP STATION: Structure complete. No mechanical work done as yet. Contract approximately 51 percent complete to date. J-13 -SHOPS AND WAREHOUSE FACILITIES -($1,061,989) '-"SHOP A: Forming and pouring precast walls on shop slab. AGENDA ITEM #16 ·D-2 ALL DISTRICTS Progress Report Treatment Plant Projects ..Page Three J-13 -SHOPS AND WAREHOUSE FACILITIES (Continued) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 SHOP B: Erected prccast walls~ Erecting st~cl roof framing. WAREHOUSE: Forming and pouring precast walls on warehouse slab. SITE: Rough graded. Ducts and utility plping installed. Contract approximately 23 percent complete to date. J-4-1 -INCREASED WATER REUSE FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2 -($624,643) CITY WATER PUMP STATION: Structurally and· mechanically complete. Del1n1ng of control panel is required to make system operational. CHLORINE NATER PUMP STATION: Structurally and.mechanically complete. "-"Will be rna<le operational using temporary controls. Need control panel for final completion. PLANT WATER PUMP STATION: Slab, masonry walls, roof and ducting for ·electrical room and chlorination area constructed. Motor control centers installed in electrical room to provide power for chlorine water facility. Wet well under construction. CHECK V4•.LVES AT ROTHROCK PUMP STATION: Operational. SHAKER SC~EENINGS CONVEYOR AND IIOPPER: Installing architectural paµels. Wa1t1ng for dcl1n1ng of new screw feeder. Contract approxim~tely 73 percent complete to date. TREATMENT PLANT WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During September Total Work Under Design DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During September Total Work Under Design $ 6,483,755 ·4' 07 9' 3 5 2 360,500 26,500,000 $18,148,418' 11,777,101 1,051,900 S,675,000 TOTAL ·AMOUNT UNDER CONTRACT & DESIGN October 4, 1973 AGENDA ITEM #16 D-3 $ 6,483,755 26,500,000 18,148,418 S,675,000 $56,807,173 ALL DISTRICTS .-·- incorporated 1888 orange civic center· 300 east chapman avenue. orange, califomia 92666 post office box 449 department of public works engineering division (71.4) 532--0444 October 1, 1973 - Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District No. 2 P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Annexation of Tract 4980 to Sanitation District (City Annexation No. 208) Dear Sirs: On behalf of the property owners within the ~ubject area the City of .Orange requests that the Orange County Sanitation District No. 2 annex the territory known as Tract Number 4980 (City Annexation No. 208) into the District. The subject property was developed as a subdivision in 1963 and annexed to the city at that time. However, through an oversight the property was never annexed to the Sanitation District. The area no~ consists of 36 separate lots with individual owners. We therefore request that the Board of· Directors grant the waiving of the annexation fees for thi~ a~ea. This would grea~ly simplify the annexation procedure and would nllow the process to proceed in the ·most expeditious manner. Enclosed is a plat map showing the area to be annexed and a check for $325.00 to cover the proce~sing costs of this request. Thank you for ·your consideration of this matter • . 021t!y~~ ~hn V. Fonley '-;;;;:' Director of Public ~ks JVF:WWR: rh cc: JVF GDJ WWR Engr. File AGENDA ITEM #24(a) ·-E-DISTRICT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 73-149-2 AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS ANNEXATION NO. 8 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO, 8 -TRACT NO. 4980 TO COUNTY I SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2) * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation Distriqt No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: That an application for annexation of territory to itself be made to the Local Agency Formation Commission as follows: Section 1. That this proposal is made pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California; and, Section 2. That this appli~ation is for the purpose of annexing approximately 8.205 acres in the vicinity of Mallard Street and Collins Avenue as requested by the City of Orange; and, Section 3. That the territory.to be annexed is inhabited; and, Section 4. That the designation assigned to the territory· proposed to be annexed is Annexation No. 8 -Tract No. 4980 to County Sanitation District No. 2, the boundaries of which are more particularly described and delineated on Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 5. That provisions for all fees required to be paid as a condition of the annexation must be satisfied prior to completion of annexation proceedings; and, Section 6. That request is hereby made that such proceedings as required by law be taken to complet~ this annexation. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1973. AGENDA ITEM #24(d) -F-DISTRicrr 2 , -· . Orig. REL/ ": Copy of letter, FAH, JWS UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 100 CALIFORNIA STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111 County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County Attn: Fred Harper, General Man~ger 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley CA 92708 Gentlemen: Re: c: 06 0761· 010 SEP 211973_ This Agency is pleased to offer the County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County a grant of $1,469,210 to help in the construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer from Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue. This grant offer is based upon your application as certified to this off ice by the California State Water Resources Control Board. If you wish to accept this grant offer, the original and one copy of the enclosed Grant Agreement should be signed and returned to this office as soon as possible. One copy of your transmittal letter should be sent directly to.the California State Water Resources Contiol B6ard. The plans and specifications have been approved by the California State Water R~sources Control Board and are hereby approved by this Agency. The California State Water Resources Control Board will be mc;:i.iling a Description of Procedures which contains supplemental information and special approval condi- tions. Advertisement of this project shall be delayed until the Description of Procedures is received to insure your meeti~g all Federal requirements. · Prior to advertising, you must first contact the Civil Rights and Urban Affairs Office, Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, to determine if a pre-bid conference will be required. Do not award any contra9ts unless you have the approval of this Agency. AGENDA ITEM #25 G-1 DISTRICT 2 -: If you have any questions, pl.ease contact us. Enclosures Federal Register 3c Grant ~greement ~I Sincerely, • ~ /,~<-P4!7fr~ Paul~Falco, Jr. ~egional Administrator cc: California State Water Resources Control Board Lowry & Associates .~ \ ... "" . . . . . . ·. ~: . ~; u. AGENDA ITEM #25 G-2 DISTRICT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 73-152-2 APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES WITH CITY OF GARDEN GROVE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES WITH THE CITY OF · GARDEN GROVE * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of Cou~ty Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated October 1, 1973~ by and between County Sanitation District No. 2 and the CITY OF GARDEN GROVE for collection of connection charges, as provided in . Sewer Connection Ordinance No. 203, as amended, is hereby approved · and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman. and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1973. AGENDA ITEM #26(a) -H-DISTRICTS 2 & 3 .• ..... ---1- ·RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING ST .l\~r!JARD AGREEMEW[' FOR COLLEG'l'IC~~ OF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES WITH CITY OF A RESOLurrroN OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATIO~ DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY, 'CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND. AU11HOHIZING EXECUTION OF STANDARD AGREEiIBNT FOR COLLECTION OF SEWER . CONNECTION CHARGES WITH THE CITY OF . ---------- * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.]_, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated __ ~----~~~~~'· by and between County Sanitation District No._Land the CITY OF ---------for collection _of connection charges, as provided in S.ewer Connection Ordinance No. 303, as amended, is hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Chaj.rman and Secretary of tl1e Dist1"ict are hereby authorized and directed to execute s·aid ag.1..·~ement. PASSED AND ADOPTED ~t a regular meeting held October 10, 1973. AGENDA ITEM #26(b)&(d) -I-DISTRicrr 3 RESOLUTION NO. ------- APPROVING SUPPLEMENT TO STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES WITH OITY OF A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, . CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SUPPLEMENT TO STANDARD AGREEMEN'I1 FOR COLLECTION OF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES WITH THE CITY OF INCORPORATING ~u-H_O_L_D_H_A_R_r-~L-E_S_'_S~"-P_R_O_V--IS_I_O_N_s_m_1H-E-REIN * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No._3_ of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Supplement dated August 8, 1973, to that certain Standard Agreement for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges by and between County Sanitation District No._3~and the CITY OF for collection of Sewer --------------- Connection Charges, as provided iri Sewer ·Connection Ordinance No. 303 , as amended, is hereby approved and ~ccepted; and, Section 2. That the Ch~~rman·arid Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said· agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a r·egular meeting held October 10, 1973 . . . AGENDA ITEM #26(b)&(d) -J-DISTRICT 3 RESOLUTION NO. 73-154-3 APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES WITH STANTON COUNTY WATER· DISTRICT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES WITH THE STANTON COUNTY WATER DISTRICT * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated October 10, 1973, by and between County Sanitation District No. 3·and the STANTON COUNTY WATER DISTRICT for collection of cbnnection charges, as provided in Sewer Connection Ordinance No. 303, ·as amended, is hereby approved and adopted; .and, . Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby approved and directed to execute said agreement. · PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1973. AGENDA ITEM #26(c) -K~ DISTRICT 3 RESOLUTION NO. 73-155-3 APPROVING SUPPLEMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF SEWER CONNEC'l1ION CHARGES WITH STANTON COUNTY WATER DISTRICT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SUPPLEMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES WITH THE STANTON COUNTY WATER DISTRICT INCORPORATING " HOLD HARMLESS" PROVISIONS THEREIN * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Supplement dated October 10, 1973, to that certain Agreement for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges by and. between County Sanitation District No. 3 and the STANTON COUNTY WATER DISTRICT for collection of Sewer Connection Charges, as provided in Sewer Connection Ordinan9e No. 303, as. amended, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1973. AGENDA ITEM #26(c) -L..:.. DISTRICT 3 M E M 0 R A N D U M Oc~obe.r 4, 197 3 TO: F~ed A. Harper, General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.0:---80X 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (7i4) 962-2411 SUBJE-CT: Santa Ana River Interceptor -Contract No. 2-14-1 Work ha·s been completed from Harbor Boulevard to Fairview and from 17th Street to 900 feet south of Katella Avenue. Contractor is currently working on the heading from Fairview to 17th Street which must be completed by October 15th in order to meet the Flood Control District!s permit requirements. TJ1e portion from ~ 900 feet south of Katclla to Katella is now scheduled to be the last portion on the job. The work at 5th Street will be complete, including paving, by October 5th and the street will be back in service at that time. The Southern Pacific has removed their tracks north of 5th Street to enable the contractor to lay pipe without tunneling. Th~ Orange County Flood Contrcrl District's contractor, who is doing the lining of the west bank at the river north of the San Diego Freeway, may cause some interference when work is started at Plant No. 1 for the last 10,000 feet 9£ the job which is schedul~d to commence October 15t11.· This may cause some delay in constructing that portion of this contract north of the San Diego Freeway. The bicycle trail which was built by the Orange District has been completed and Sully-1.filler is in the landscaping required by their contract. ·that most of the landscaping will be completed 1973. REL:BEW:ss AGENDA ITEM #27. -M- County Flood Control currently engaged It is expected prior to December 1, DISTRICT 2 '• J I z \ ~ ' ! I . I . r-~ ~'.__~~~~~~1s~~~.c~.F.~~~~~-~f Lf0ENO l~r.o"R .C .P. CON1 ~6-C T <::1 IZ-14 -1 <:;, 5Ai\J TA A NA R l\/fR ! N1C-~C f FTOR ......................................................... ~ 5 AN iA ANA l'<.t V~I< I NiC-RCfP i OR ---~-~· ~-=~~ .. '.'.'.'.'.·~.r:·-~~=~=~-'.'.:-~™:::::'::™--:::::-::.:·"'='=' ====™==.:,....;_-_™""™_'"_™-:"".WWW_""'_"'"'_""_'n __ ... __ ..._.__ M\LC'"S oF 84" FIP..:·: 611,.z ---CO MPL :=1t ----:o B f' CONSi2 UClfO Co N "f ~AC 1 AWAROC'"O : 0 -e:,--n cosr: i$ Co,'274/t>oB SCHfQJ t..eo \:::O h: CDMP LC'T !ON : <D-!'2-74 RESOLUTION NO. 73-158-3 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF TEMPORARY RENTAL AGREEMENT WITH S & S CONSTRUCTION COMPANY RE CONTRACT 3-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF RENTAL AGREEMENT (TEMPORARY) WITH S & S CONSTRUCTION COMPANY RE CONTRACT NO. 3-17 * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain· Rental Agreement (Temporary), dated , is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, is hereby authorized and directed to enter into said agreement with S & S Construction Company relative to right of way in connectio~ with construction of Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1, and Reaches 2 and 3, Contract No. 3-17, for temporary rental of real property as described in said agreement; an.d, Section 3. That payment for said right of way in the amount of $2,000.00 per month, commencing with the month of January, 197L~ in the event use of said right of way ·is necessary beyond December 31,. 1973, is hereby authorized; and, Secbion 4. That the Chairman and Secretary be authorized and directed to execute said Temporary Rental Agreement, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1973. AGENDA ITEM #31 -N-DISTRICT 3 cou;rn· S.:\:HTt\TIO:~ JlISTJ:IC:TS OF OP.J\::GE cou::rt' P.O. Box 3127 -10:.)-l 1 l Elli~ ,\venue Fountain Valley, California ~2708 CIIANGE O!Wl.R ~·fcGu ire Cons trnct inn CnTT!nanv . . c.o. DATE October 10, 1073 JOH:Bolsa Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 10, Contract No. 3-17-1 Fr Dolsa: Ave. Storm Drai Amount of this Change Order Q;IDiA) (DEDUCT) $ 352.50 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the co~ract and/or contract Hork arc hereby authorized and as conpensation therefor, the following additions to or de<luctions.from the contract price arc hereby approvc<l. . .... REFERENCE: Contract Proposal, Schedule of Prices The contractor was directed.to place one (1) additional foot of rock bedding under the 33" VCP due to poor ground conditi.ons.from Station 6+50 to Station 8+25~ 33 C.Y. @ $7.SO'for $247.50 ADJ) $247.50 ' The contractor's request to install plastic pipe in lieu of 16 gauge welded steel pipe for the temporary siphon inside the 33" VCP is her~by granted. Item 38 of the contract wil 1 be p'aid in full, however ·the District will realize a savin~s for this change of matqrials. DEDUCT TOTAL DEDUCT : Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes $600.00· $352.50 $ 382,414.00 $ o.oo This Change r~tsl}) (DEDiJCT) $ 352.50 ----~~~--~-- • l3oard authorization date: October 10, 1973 lly __________________ ~--,-------~-------Cons u It ing Engineer By ______________________ -:T"~----:--- Con tractor AGENDA ITEM #33(a) Amended Contract Price $ 382,061.50 Approved: COUNTY SJ\NITATIO!J DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By --~~--~~---~~~--.c-1~11_c_·~f _,....,E-n-~-1-n_c_c " . -0-DISTRICT 3 \.AHJ1" l l ~i\.l 111\1 l lJ:, 1J 1 ~)Ji~ l t. J :-:> lll· U!-'.1\:·;l1 I: l:UU:, ! ) P. O. Box 8127 -l08-l 1l Elli~ ,\venue Fountain Valley, California ~2708 CIIA~GE OlW~R· c. o. ;\o. 2 CO:·tf P..ACTOR: ~kGuire Construction Car.many --~~~~~~~~~-DATE October 10, 1973 JOB:Bolsa .Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 10, Contract No. 3-171-fJ Bolsa~ Ave. Storm Draj Amourit of this Change Order. (?;\'IJ'ii) (DEDUCT) $ 2,672.00 In a.ccordanco w'ith contract provisions, the following changes in the co~ract an<l/or contract Hork arc hereby authorized an<l as cor:1pcns<tt.ion th c r cf or , t :1 c £ o 11 ~wing a <l <l i ti on s to or tl c <l u ct ions from th c contract . pr i c e are hereby approved. .. .. Adjustment of Engineer's Quantit'ies Item No. Unit From To Difference Unit Price 1 · L. F. i,700 2,691 5 Each 2 o· 6 Each· 2 0 7 C.Y. 10 0 13 L.F. 2,030 2,013 ' Hoard authorization date: October 10, 1973 By----------------~-----------------Cons u It i ng Engineer By-------------------------~~~--C on tractor AGENDA ITEM #33(b) 9 $ 2 2 ·. 10 17 54.00 126. s.o 167 .• 00 34.10 .7 4. 00 TOTAL DEDUCT $ 486.00 253.00: 334.00 341.00 1,258.00 $ 2,672.00 Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes #1 $ 382,414.00 $ 352.50. ----- This Change (:IDJD) (DEDUCT) $ 2, 672. 00 Amended Contract Price $ 379,389.50 :..p_ Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By ----~--~~----~~---c-h_1_c_l~t~·n-r-.1~n-c-c DISTRICT 3 cou;~TY S:\: l I"L\T Io:~ J) I :,TJ: I er s OF 0!'.,\: :s E cou::rx' P. O. Box 3127 -100-l·l Ellis i\vC"uuc Fountain Valley, California <J2708 CJIANGE OIWE!~ C. 0. NO. 3 CO:\'fRACTOR.: ~kGuire Construction Company DATE 0-c-t o_h_e_r_l_0_,_1_0_7_3 __ _ JOll:Bolsa Relief Trunk Sewer, Rea~l1 10, Contract No. 3-17-1 & Bols~ Ave~. Storm Dra Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 0. 00 · In accordance with contract provisions, the following chang~s in the c~tract anJ/or contract work arc hereby authorized an<l as c01:-tpcnsation therefor, the following additions to or <lc<luctions from the contract_pricc arc hereby approve<.!. · .... The Contractor is hereby granted an extensiorr of ti~e due to inclement weather The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of time due to late pipe deliveries sm.tMARY OF CONTRACT re.rn: priginal Contract Date · Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Revis~d Contract Time Revised Completion Date TOTAL TIME EXTENSION January 18, 1973 180 Calendar Days July 16, 1973 256 Calendar Days September·30, .. 1973 : Original Contract Price 35 calendar days 41 calendar days 76 calendar days·-- $ 382,414.00 Prev. Auth. Changcslf's 1&2$ --------3,024.50 This Change (ADD) (DDDUCT) $ o.oo ----~--~~--- Amended Contract Price $ 379,389.50 Board authorization date: Approved: October IO, 1973 By ---------------c~o-n_s_u~l-t_i_n_g __ E-·1·1-g-1~1-1c---c-r By------------------------~-------C on tractor AGENDA ITEM #33(c) . -Q- COUKTY SJ\NITATIOH DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By ----------------~~--.C~l~11~c--£~-__...,.E-n-~~1-n_c_c (. ~ DISTRICT 3 MEMORANDUM October .4, 1973 TO: Fred A. Harper,· General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer· COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 SUBJECT: · Knott Interceptor ~ewer -Contract No. 3-17 To date, work has progressed to Edinger Avenue, north of the San Diego Freeway. Work at this point was stopped for several days due to a strike at Hydro Conduit Corporation, which curtailed pipe shipments. Work resumed on October 1, 1973 and the Contractor has most of the mitered pipe installed on the north side of Edinger at Newland. When this section is completed, backfilled, compacted and paved, traffic will be diverted from the south side to the north side arid this section will be tied to the already completed portion south of Edinger. · Work continues on clean-up south of the San Diego Freeway. Currently the Contractor is carrying out restoration of the intersection of Newland and Hi el with the construction of cros·s gutters and underdrains. The first course of pavement has been placed to the no:·th of Heil and the closure with the tunnel under the San Diego Freeway has been complet~d and is being backfilled. The Contractor is also working on the crossing of the Flood Contiol Channel north of McFadden Avenue. This work is scheduled for completion by October 15, 1973. Upon completion of this portion of the project, work will commence on the construction of the 18-inch VCP sewer westerly on McFadden. REL:hjm ' AGENDA ITEM #36. .-R-DISTRICT 3 I . l HlJN1 lN6iON Bf~Crl e{ . ' ! I "-~~~~~""""""..--~~~.-.-~~~~~~~~--.r-- FOUNT~l 'N \/A~Le'Y .. ··1 • ----··· f /lv-·•,.. ;· ... ...,· ··' ... __. .:.,//I'',;...• \., I , .... ... -1-I ----/(} .:~,.' Lfoe=-ND . I,.'. I I . 1. I I I ; ' i I . I I I ! .. ·' ... . " I .· : I .. , ... j· . . ' ' . M E M 0 R A N D U M October ·4, 1973 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Ma1rager· FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (7 I 4) 540-29 I 0 (71'4) 962-2411 SUBJECT: Knott Interceptor, Reac~ 4 -Con~ract No. 3-18 Contractor has submitted most of his shop drawings which have been processed. S & S Construction Company has granted the District the construction easer.1ent paral'lel to Balsa Avenue . and this easement has been cleared and is being used for pipe storage. Excavation was started at the heading at l3olsa Avehuc and Newland on September 24th witl1 some difficulty encountered due to a combination of depth, poor ground, and utilities. The contractor to date has laid approximately 100 feet of pipe, most.of which is in the curve. It is expected that this curve will take at least another week to complete, after which time construction is estimated to proceed at a. greater construction rate. The tJnnel pit at Beach Boulevard is complete and t~e tunneling has b·~en started. The tunneling subcontractor is currently working 24 hours a day in order to stay ahead of the poor soil conditions. The Division of Highways is requiring that th.e tunnel be peripherally grouted every 24 hours. It is expected that it will take at least 30 working ~ays to complete the tunnel. The pipe supplier, Ilydro-Conduit Corporation, went out on strike the last week in September. _This had 1 i ttle effect on the production of this contract since more than enough pipe had been stockpiled on the job previously. REL:BEW:ss AGENDA ITEM #36 -S-. DISTRICT 3 11 '"'-'-'"-'------· -_J L . _A\/E'". ~ <l 0 0 0 ~ 'I:{ 8 (5 ,...... fJ. C O UNiY OF O RAN 6 f ( .. . ;, ... ., . RESOLUTION NO. 73-160-5 APPROVING MASTER PLAN REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A SEWERAGE FACILITY REIMBURSEMENrr AGREEMENT WITH IRVINE COMPANY FOR OVERSIZING OF BAYSIDE DRIVE TRUNK SEWER AT PROMONTORY POINT * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That this Board of Directors has heretofore on December 28, 1971,, declared its intent to enter into a reimbursement agreement with the Irvine Company for oversizing of the Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer at Promontory Point; and,,. Section 2. That by Resolution No. 73-121-5 this Board of Directors has accepted said ·oversizing and relocation of the Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer at Promontory Point as complete in accordance with District requirements; and, Section 3. That the certain Sewerage Facility Reimbursement AgreeNent dated October 10, 1973,, between County Sanitation District No. 5 and the Irvine Company,,_ providing for reimbursement by the District for oversizing of said facility, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 4. That reimbursement in the total amount of $109,688.55 as detailed on the attached "Exhibit A" is hereby authorized to be made from the ·Facilities Revolving Fund of the District in accordance with the terms and conditions outlined in said agreement; and, Section 5. That reimbursement shal-1 commence in the fiscal year following completion of the entire new Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer from Bay Bridge Pump1ng Station to the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and the existin~ boundary of the City of Newport Beach; and, Section 6. That said ·reimbursement agreement shall be non- interest bearing;_ and, Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District in form acceptable to the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10,, 1973. AGENDA ITEM #41 -T-DISTRICT 5 RESOLUTION NO. 73-161-5 ABANDONING PORTION OF BAYSIDE DRIVE TRUNK SEWER A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FORMALLY ABANDONING A PORTION OF THE BAYSIDE DRIVE TRUNK SEWER AND ORDERING THE VALUE THEREOF REMOVED FROM THE DISTRICT'S BOOKS OF ACCOUNT· * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the District entered into an agreement dated October 1, 1970, with Irvine Company for the relocation of a portion of the Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer; and, WHEREAS, a portion of said trunk described on Schedule nAn of subject agreement is now inactive pecause of the relocation of said portion and is of no further use to the District; and, WHEREAS, the precent value of said portion carried on the books of account of the District is $16,459.58, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AND ORDERED THAT:. Section 1. That portion of the Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer described as "Existing Sanitation District Trunk to be Abandoned" on Schedule nA" of that certain agreemeD:t for relocation of the Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer dated October 1, 1970, be and is hereby formally abandoned and declared of no further service to the District; and,- Section 2. Th~ value of said portion of th~ Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer in the amount of $16,459.58, and accumulated depreciation and amortization, be ordered removed from the Books of Account of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular ~eeting held October 10, 1973. AGENDA ITEM #42 -U-DISTRICT 5 MEMORANDUM October S, 1973 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer SUBJECT: Master Plan Trunk Sewers -District No. 7 -COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. o:-1Jox 8121 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71.4) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 As reported at the September 12th Board Meeting, it is my opinion that the District should proceed with the necessary preliminary engineering to establish the finai alignments of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer in District No. 7, commencing at the intersection of Mitchell and Red Hill and terminating in the Orange Park Acres area. Recent stream gaging of the sewers in the Tustin and North Tustin area reveals that the sewers are running at near capacity ~ at this time. Certain diversion sewers which will be constructed during January 1974 and as authorized by the Board on September 12th, will provide greater flexibility in the System thereby averting a surcharge condition in certain reaches of the trunk and subtrunk sewer system in the northerly portions of District No. 7. Pursuant to the direction of the Board of Directors, Boyle Engineering has submitted a proposal to perform ~he necessary preliminary engineering services for the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer System,· Reaches 10-18 for a lump sum fee of $17,350. Tho services requested are as stipulated in the Boyle Engineering letter of October 2nd. Because of the various alternate routes which must be investigated and correlated with the needs of the cities. and unincorporated areas to be served, along wlth the data and information required for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement, it is necessary that this preliminary work be authorized in order that the District may proceed with its construction schedule as set forth in the Master Plan of Trunk Sewers and as required to meet the demands of the District. It should also be noted that of the lump sum fee of $17,350, all with the-exception of $4,000 is applicable to the final design fee for the preparation of plans and ·specifications for this project and shall be deducted at the time the Board of Directors instruct the solicitation of a proposal to complete this System. REL:hjm AGENDA rrEM #50 · V-1 DISTRICT 7 BDLJ/e 1=-naineerino Corporation 412 South l ;-on SrrcC't P.O. Box 178 Sc1f1ta Ana. Cc?lifomia 92 702 Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE CQUNTY Post" Office Box· 8127 Fountai~ Valley, California 92708 Attention Mr. Ray E. Lewis Chief Engineer consu1t1nq C?nq1neers / architects 714 / 547-4471 October 21 1973 Pursl!ant to 'Mr. Lewis's request, we are pleased to submit our proposal for furnishing pro- fessional engineering services for preliminary engineering studies and design primarily to determine the precise routing of i·he Tustin-Orange Trunk, Reaches 10 through 18. As reported to the di rectors at the September board meeting, the existing North Trunk is rapidly approaching peak capacity. It is expected that this condition will occur within the next 18 months, af· which time the north central section of the district wi fl be defi- cient in trunk capacity. The· Tustin-Orange Trunk has been planned to eliminate this pending deficiency and to provide enough capacity for ful I land use with its drainage area .._, os outlined in the district's "Master Plan Trunk Sewer Facilities -May 1969.11 The total estimated project cost, including construction, engineering, surveying, inspection, ad- ministrative1 legal, and miscellaneous costs, is $2,662,000. We will perform the following professional engineering services for the preliminary engi- neering phase of the Tustin-Orange Trunk. 1. Check for latest rand use within the Tustin-Orange drainage area and update land- use plat:') as required. Consult with the cities of Tustin and Orange, the county, and maior landowners. 2. Revise master-plan flow calculations as required to conform to latest land-use plans. 3. Gather right-of-way maps and easement documents for roadways, railroad crossings, above-and below-ground utilities, etc. Contact cities of Tustin and Orange, Si·ate Division of Highways, Orange County Flood Control District, Orange County Road Department, and Southern Pacific Transportation Companies. ·· AGENDA I'l1EM #50. V-2 DISTRICT 7 Mr. Fred A. Harper -2-. October 2, 1973 4. Prepare preliminary engineering studies, investigate alternative alignments for the trunk (alignments to be consistent with drainage area hydraulic commitments), and refine alignments. These studies wil I be submitted to staff and other agencies re- quired for approva I. · 5. Revise master-plan alignment where feasible and economically advantageous. 6. Prepare preliminary layout sketches, outlines, specifications and reports, where applicable, and specific engineering recommendations. 7. Hold m~etings with City Managers, Directors of Public Works of cities of Tustin and Orange, and county staff. Give briefing on proposed project. 8. Prepare alignment map for presentation to cities of Tustin and Orange and Orange County Road Department for their concun-ence in alignment as required in Health and Safety Code (Section 4759). 9. Prepare individual drainage-area m~ps for each city relative to service area of trunk in that city. Present with alignment map. 10. Update master-plan schedules of estimated expenditures, final cost analysis, etc. 11. Prepare·necessary information and letters for transmittal to local agencies for their concurrence in alignment. 12.· ! !old final conferences with cities of Tustin and Orange and Orange County Road De~rfment on routing, expectant problems, maps, etc. Coordinate with their pro- posed projects. 13. Submit necessary infonnation to district staff and lend assistance in the preparation of environmental impact reports where necessary. 14. Confer with distrid staff and board of directors where required for implementation of proposed project. AGENDA ITEM #50 V-3 DISTRICT 7. Mr. Fred A. Harper -3-October 2, 1973 We propose to provide the services in items l through 14 for a lump-sum fee of $17,350. We suggest that payment be monthly on a percentage-complete basis as mutually agreed upon by Mr. Ray E. Lewis / Chief Engineer of the district, and Mr. Conrod Hqhener1 Jr •1 Project Manager for the proposed work. Upon notice from the district to proceed with the ·final design of these systems, the preliminary eng!neering-study fees wi II be credited toward the final design fee-with the exception of environme~tal impact study expendi-. tures. The EIR work is a separate activity and is not used in the preparation of final plans and specifications for construction of the foci Ii ties. The deduction for EIR work would be $4,000. If we ore authorized to proceed at the October 10, 1973, board meeting, we anticipate completing al I of the work by the February 1973 board meeting. · BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION {&JULd)~u~~ ~. Conrad Hohener, Jr., PE Principal Civil Engineer Id AGENDA I'.l1EM #50 V-4. DISTRICT 7 RESOLUTION NO. 73-163-11 ABANDONING PORTION OF NEWLAND AVENUE FORCE MAIN A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FORMALLY ABANDONING A PORTION OF THE NEWLAND AVENUE FORCE MAIN (BANNING TRUNK SEWER) AND ORDERING THE VALUE THEREOF REMOVED FROM THE DISTRICT'S BOOKS OF ACCOUNT * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the District entered into an agreement dated December 9, 1971, with Southern California Edison Company for the relocation of a portion of the Newland Avenue Force Main (Banning Trunk Sewer); and, WHEREAS, a portion of said trunk described on Exhibit "A" of ~ubject agreement is now inactive because of the relocation of said portion and is of no further use to the District; and, WHEREAS, the present value of said portion carried on the books of account of the District is $13,776.oo, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AND ORDERED THAT: Section 1. That portion of the Newland Avenue Force Main (Banning Trunk Sewer) descr.ibed as "Existing .VCP Sewer t'o be Abandoned or Removed" on Exhibit "A" of that certain agreement for relocation of the Newland Avenue Force Main dated December 9, 1971, be and is hereby formally abandoned and declared of no further service to the District; and, Section 2. The value of said portion of the Newland Avenue Force Main (Banning Trunk Sewer) in the amount of $13,776.00, and accumulated depreciation and amortization, be orde~ed removed from the Books of Account of the District. ·PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1973. AGENDA ITEM #57 -W-DISTRICT 11 Name of Project: Location: Project to be Undertaken by: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT October·5, 1973 COUNTY SANITATJON DISTRICTS of ORANG.~ COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.0.80X8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VAL~~:, CALIFORNIA 92708 (7 i 4) 540-29 l 0 (714) 962-24l ! Proposed Slater Avenue Sewer Pump Station Wet Well Repair Slater Avenue between Golden West Street and Gothard Street -City of Huntington Beach County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California The District's staff, having undertaken and completed an initial study of this project in accordance with Section 2 8 of_ the bis tr i ct ' s. guide 1 ine s e ·n tit 1 e d "Lo ca 1 Guide 1 i ne s Implementing the California ~nvironmental Qualtty Act of 1970, as Amended,'' for the purpose of ascertaining whether the proposed project might have a ·~ignificant effect on the en- vironment, has reached the following conclusions: FAH:RAW:ch ~ Attachment The project could not. have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, a negative de- claration should be prepared. ' Fred A. Harper General Manager AGENDA ITEM #58(a) X-1 DISTRICT 11 GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT.ASSESSMENT FOR PROPOSED REPAIR OF SLATER AVENUE SEWER PUMP STATION WET WELL .. : Pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, the staff has evaluated the environmental significance of the proposed repair of the Slater Avenue Pump Station. In the determination of whether the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, the staff con- sidered both primary and secondary consequences. The staff's recommendations and conclusions are herein enclosed for the Board's consideration. SCOPE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Since the construction of the Slater Avenue Pump Station in 1966, excessive attack of hydrogen sulphide gases has caused severe deterioration to the exposed concrete with1n the Station wet well and manhole shaft. Although this condition has not endangered the structural integrity of the wet well, it appears prudent ·at ..,_, this time to prevent further concr.,ete deterioration, thus extending the life of the Station. · The project consists of sand blasting the exposed concrete within the wet well and manhole shaft anp applying a plastic coating over a new 3/4" mortar base. The existing manhole grade rings will also be replaced w~th plastic coated grade rings. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY CONSEQUENCES CONSIDERED 1. All the·.proposed work will be performed within the existing Pump Station and will not have any effect on the.surrounding environment. No landscaping or aesthetic deterioration will result from this project. 2. The proposed project will have no effect on rare or endangered species.of animal or plant nor the habitat of such species. 3. The proposed project does not violate or breech any published national, state or local standards AGENDA ITEM #58(a) X-2 DISTRICT 11 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR PROPOSED REPAIR OF SLATER AVENUE SEWER PUMP STATION WET WELL relating to solid waste or litter control. .. ~ 4. The proposed project will not have any direct detrimental effect on the air or water quality or the ambient noise levels of the adjacent areas. 5. Th~ proposed project will not cause any sub- stantial flood erosion, siltation nor will it create any major geological hazard. 6. The proposed project will in no way provide a vehicle to stimulate g~owth within the surround- ing area. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS It is the opinion of the staff that the considered repair of the aforementioned Pump Station will not impose a significant impact on the environment and will not serve·as·a· vehicle for stimulating growth. It is recommended that the Board direct the Secretary to proceed in the preparation of a negative declaration in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. AGENDA ITEM #58(a) . X-3 DISTRICT 11 RESOLUTION NO. 73-164-11 MAKING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE THEREOF A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, MAKING A NEGATIVE DECLARAT~ON AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE THEREOF RE PROPOSED SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION WET WELL REPAIR * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. l~ of Orange County, California, does hereby resolve that, WHEREAS, the project concerning which this determination is made is described as Additions to the Slater Avenue Pump Station Wet Well Repair; and, WHEREAS, an initial study of the environmental effects of said project has been undertaken and completed and the ·results thereof have been reviewed by this Board; NOW THEREFORE, ·IT IS HEREBY FOUND, DECLARED AND ORDERED as follows: Section 1. That said project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. Section 2. That the Secretary be and is hereby authorized and instructed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Office of the County Clerk ot Orange County and at the office 6f County Sanitation District No. 11 to be available for public inspection. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1973. AGENDA ITEM #58(b) . -Y-DISTRICT 11 RESOLUTION NO. 73-165-11 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWER AND APPURTENANCES IN SLATER AVENUE FROM NEWLAND AVENUE TO GOTHARD STREET, CONTRACT NO. 11-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWER AND APPURTENANCES IN SLATER AVENUE FROM NEWLAND-AVENUE TO GOTHARD STREET, CONTRACT NO. 11-12 * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Environmental Impact Repprts have been prepared and approved in accordance with the,provisions of the District's Local Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 2. That said project is hereby approved, and the detailed plans, specifications anq contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Keith and Associates,· District's engineers, for construction of Sanitary Sewer and Appurtenances in Slater Avenue from Newland Avenue to Gothard Str'eet, Contract No. 11-12, are hereby approved and adopted; ~nd, Section 3. That the Secretary b~ directed to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with the District's Local Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1~70, as amended; and, Section 4. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for .said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 5. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be received and publicly opened; and, Section 6. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1973. AGENDA ITEM #59(c) -Z-DISTRICT 11 ...;.-. RESOLUTION NO. 73-166-11 AUTHORIZING .EXECUTION OF GRANT OF EASEMENT TO CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF GRANT OF EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH RE NEWLAND-HAMILTON PUMP STATION * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated October 10, 1973, grants to the City of Huntington Beach, a permanent easement for street improvements adjacent to the Oistrict's Newland-Hamilton Pump Station; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exh~bits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is granted at no cost to the City of Huntington Beach; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to execute said Grant of Easement in form acceptable to the General Coun~el. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1973. ITEM #60 -----AA-DISTRICT 11 ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA Agenda Item No · \ \ - RONALD REAGAN, Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL ZONE CONSERVATION COMMISSION SOUTH COAST REGIONAL COMMISSION 666 E. OCEAN BOULEVARD, SUITE 3107 P.O. BOX 1450 LONG BEACH, CALIFO~NIA 90801 (213) "36-4201 (71.4) 8-'6-0648 213/432-6803 714/846-0306 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Pursuant to order of the California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission, notice of public hearing is hereby given. Said public hearing is for the enclosed Proposed Interim Guidelines and Proce- dural Guidelines • . Said public hearing will be held at: Long Beach Harbor Administration Building Board Room, Sixth Floor 925 Harbor.Plaza Drive Long Beach on October 29, 1973 at 3 p.m. The h~aring will adjourn for dinner and reconvene at 8 p.m. At this time and place all persons either favoring or opposing all proposed guidelines will be heard. Any written correspondence regard- ing· the proposed guidelines should be direc.ted to this office prior to the hearing date. All interested individuals who wish additional information may contact David Homsy, Chief Planner, 213/432-6803 or 714/846-0306, at this office. Also enclosed for information only is a copy of the co·astal Zone Plan Schedule. Public hearing will not be held on this schedule. ~~~.·~ M. J. arpen· -r Executi.ve Di ector September 25, 1973 MJC:eb Enclosures. Exc.erpt from South Coast Regional Conunission' s Proposed Interim Guidelines ·13. Biologically harm.ful discharges to fresh or saline waters will not be permitted. Highest state-of-the-art provisions will be applied to the removal and disposition of solid and liquid waste. Regional Water Quality Control Board standards shall serve as minimum requirements for all development. No development will be approved on· or in the waters of the perm~t area unless effective measures are taken to prevent siltation -or other harmful dis- charges of the development from entering waters of the permit area. However, in those cases where developments are discharging effluents into coastal waters, including bays, estuaries and la- goons the following additional criteria shall apply: (a) Treatment must not produce a discharge with a temperature greater than five (5) degrees above or below the ambient temperature. (b) There be a minimum 9~ dissolved oxygen demand reduction. ( c) That the maximum conc.entration of .NH 3 be 2 MG/liter. (d) The minimum residual oxygen be 2 MG/liter. (e) NH3 and 02 sensors be installed and monitor ~ater discharge at all times to assume conditions (c) and (d) are met. 14. Developments should· not unnecessarily encroach upon the beach or water areas adjacent to the shoreline. . 15. No permanent alteration of the curvature of the coastline by land excavation and removal should be perm:l.tted except in harbors and ports presently developed for commercial or industrial and ex- cepting emergency alterations for public saf'ety. 16. Properties possessing especially high potential for public rec- reation should not be developed to other uses unless and until the Regional Coastal Plan has been developed and all federal, state and public agencies or other interested parties should be (3) EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, . OF ORAIJGE COUNTY, CALIF0RNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., October 10 , 19 73 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quo~um present f?r each District's Board. * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 2 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjour~ed to 5:30 p.m., October 17, 1973. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:27 p.m. "STATE OF CALIFORNIAl SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 10th day of October 1973 ' 11th S-107 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have day of October, 1973. ~y hand this ~ie Boards of Directors an.itation-Districts Nos. §, _ 7, _ and 11 OCTOBER 10, 1 9 '(3 f'!J.E ETING ·-.. #6 -Report of Joint Chairmart Finnell announced that the Chairmen of Districts 2 and 7 had :ffquested · that agenda item~ Nos. 24 (Distr~ct 2) and 29 (Districts 2 & 7) be held until the end of the meeting .because they may require considerable discussion. He then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for October 30th and invited Directors Edwards and Garthe to attend. Briefly reported on meeting in Washington, D.C. September 30th -October 2nd and then referred the report to· Mr. Harper to explain the meetings. further. #7 -Report of the General Manag~r Mr. Harper reported that they met with top people such as John Quarles. Were very sympathetic to our situation and are well aware of ramifications as far as money is concerned. Were top legal people there. Only way they say they can make a change is by a change in the Act. Since meeting was with the staff people in the Senate Public Works Committee, included Chief Counsel and people that actually wrote the Bill. Also attended by .~; representatives from Alaska, Hawaii, Guam, State of Washington and Orange ~}.I'" o/. -. County. Were very reluctant to amend Bill because when a bill goe s · 1t i '~fl\i>' through Congress to be amended, e verybody can start tacking on thin g s. ~>. \f\)7~· Are afraid there will be s o much added on it that it will not be able ~ l to pass~ Met with heads of national conservation g roups also. Were ·t very interested in what we had to tell them. Also were conc e rned about \ amending the Bill .. Reported tha t at another meeting receive d information from a man in Senator Muskie's office. Said Sen a tor Muskie was going to ask the National Study Commission to look at definitions of EP A for secondary treatment and best practicable waste treatment t e chnolo g y, and have them report back in the spring--not only from t e chnical asp~ct but from social and environmental aspect. We are only age ncy that submitted to EPA our appToach or what we have as the best practicab l e waste treatment technolo gy for oc ~a n discharg e. Said at this stage, if nothing else, we have established that secondary treatme nt a s defined by EPA is going to be the best .practicable waste treatment technolo g y required in 1983 for deep ocea~ dischar g ers. At least we have bro u ght that to their attention. Hyde asked why Lo s An g ele s County wa s n't showing any interest? FAH commented that the State of Washing ton asked that que s tion too. Don't have an answer why they don't. They say we ·have thre e strong members on Hou s e Public Works Comrnitte e --Anders on, Clausen & Johnson. In City of LA have to go through s o ma ny committees to get anything done. After Mr. Adams me t with ···LA Bo a rd, they immediately pas s ed a r e solution that they were ~oin g to s e c ondary treat~ent as kind of a bluff. Everybody a g rees with us but w2 haven't had much help to get in and do something about it. Mr. Harper then called the Directors' attention to the report on the bidding on the ocean outfall that wa s mailed to the m and advised that the r e was a mo vi e avai l a ble on the co n stru ction of the out fa ll if any o f the Directo r s were inte r e s te d. Va n de rw aa l mo v e d th at the movi e b e s hown a t th e e nd o f the meetin g a n d t h e mot i on ca rried . #8 -Re port of the Gene r a l Coun se l Report e d t hat it was-fairly rout ine month. Ha <;l a numb e r of calls on effe ct of c onne ct i on c h a r ge o r d ina n ces in Dis tricts 2 a nd 3 , Said h e h a d h e ld pre tt y f irm to t h e p os itio n tha t th e ordina nc e say s th a t i f the building p ermit i s n ot issue d b y Oc tob e r 1 st , e ven t hough i t was is s ued on th e 2nd a n d t h e y have h a d i t in the r e a couple mo nths , they sti-1-1 h a v e to pay the f ee . Al s o wo rked on ma tter s ·conc ernin g ri g ht of way acqui s ition. #11 -Re South Coast Regional Zone Conservation Commission FAH reported on Nntice of P11hli~ Hearing of Coast al r ,....n servation Commission for South. Coast Regional Area. and reviewed excerpt from their guidelines on back of notice in Directors' folders. -said they are proposing s~ecific limitations that Boards h~v~ discussed in t h e past. ·FAH explained what their guidelines meant to us in the .way of dollars. Said they are making the.se restrictions for coas.t-al waters, including bays, estuaries. and lagoons, but for open ocean we do not have any information. Further reviewed their requirement s and how we could meet .them. _Said we do not have any scientific information that says this is necessary. Re oxygen requirment, two different ways to do it. One is biological nitrofication (?),which over and above secondary treatment, will add $100 million to our costs. and if we go to air stripping, which is a lime treat ment to raise the pH, are talking about $130 million over and above secondary treatment. Our operating cost right now for secondary treatment are going to be doubled ($3.6 million) and for air stripping would be $6.9 million. Staff is recommending actions listed on agenda. Finnell then stated that he thought Directors would be interested in hearing more about position of State Board re reimbursement on their grants. Mr. Harper reported that the way we found out about these guidelines was from a telephone call from a representative of the SWRCB. Said he asked them their position and if they were going to oppose them, and they said, not directly but were going to write a letter saying that any capital expenditures required here that were over and over the State Board's requirements, would not receive state or local funding.. Would be the responsibility of the taxpayer. Finnell advised that Senator Randolph had proposed an a mendment to allow California to be able to be reimbursed for pas t grants. Kymla asked if FAH needed more authority to submit application and was answered no, that he already had it. EXECUTIVE SESSION (#13) 7:58 -8:42 p.m. ' #19 -ALL DISTRICTS Other business I / Finnell proposed motion regarding· authority to apply for \. reimbursement for projects .in 1960 (??) Motion · carried. additional Also mentioned CASA meeting at the Newporter Inn on November 2 & 3 (\ and told .Directors to contact _¥AH if they were interested in attending. fij,\Jt #24 & #29 -Deferred until end of meeting · ~ #38 DISTRICT 3 warrants Just requested that payment to J. F. Shay be held up until they took care of problems. Finnell advised the mayor of Fountain Valley had already talked to them before the meeting regarding thii and it was agreed to hold payment. #39 -DIST.RICT 3 Other business Vanderwaal asked if it would benefit the Districts if each individual city would pass a resolution supporting the Districts' objections discussed previously on the Coastal Zone Conservation Commission's Guidelines. It was then moved and seconded that information be sent to all cities regarding the Coastal Zone Commission's requirements so that they could notify the Commission of their objections before the October 29th hearing in Long Beach. It was also requested that this information be sent to the mayors of the cities rather than t h e city councils, as they may not meet before the hearing date. · -2- #39 -Continued Vanderwaal also had a question regarding bill that was just signed r e Sta.ce OSHA requi1·ments. Wonciered if it had any aft·ec-r; on u s immed1a17e.ly_? Finnell answered that it probably did, but the staff hadn't, had time to analyze the bill yet. #53 -Annexations Nos. 31 & 33 Mr. Harper just advised that thes e were an~exations that had been approved by and Boards and n.ow approved by LAFC and are back to Boards for final approval. Yr\ #24 -Annexation No. 8 -Tract 4980 (Dist. 2) v/; FAH retfjted thatthe tax bill now shows that this is in 7A. This was an · : oversi as this area is not a part of District No. 2 but is receiving \,/ ~:· sewer ervice from District 2. Have been working with City of Orange .W \~ since 1969 to try to get area annexed into District 2. Had a meeting ~ \ with City of Orange, and Chairmen Smith and Nevil and discussed this. ~ Nevil then reported. on meeting. Said memo from coun~ indicates that we have a lot of latitude whether we want to char~e the connection fees or not according to ordinance or waive .them. Also do we want to charge the annexation fee which is $3,000. or do we want to split it or waive it~ There are problems in the annexation because it is inhabited and there would have to be an election by the people unless ·we could secure 100% consent. If they did not annex, District could install a · fee. Said he personally felt that connection fee would not be in order and should waive it. Regarding the annexation fee of $3,000, City of Orange would probably pay that themselves rather than explain to residences. Said Public Works Director indicated he thought it would be more fair. Nevil said he thought it would be fair to waive half the fee and split the other half. . ··. It was then moved & seconded to receive & file the letter from the ';Y ~ t,//City of Orange. (Item 24(a) Motion carried. -~ / ...:?Nevil further moved that. in Tract 4980 the connection fees be waived. \\~~ ,}Jl~-Smith seconded the motion. Winn asked what the basis was for that as ~ ~4'\>I" they have been [etting a free ride. Nevil stated that the recently ~.~¥"./" adopted ordinance has a provision that anyone in the District has to \LY// October 1st but they are not :n District so could legally charge them the fee .. Is going to be difficult to explain this to people who have had sewer service for t~~A last 10 years and now throw and $250 fee and annexation fee on the~ and they have to vote to do it. Finnell commented that this basically follows philosophy that we aren't out to get houses that areie:t there. Nevil stated that we should be, trying to rectify and clear up this oversite. The least bad publicity with these people the better. ""?Kowalski then called for the question on the motion to waive the connection charges. Motion carried. · It was then moved and seconded that the annexation fee be paid by the City of Orange. Smith said that there is a feeling in Orange that it is not all the City's fault, and that City is going to have to try to get this goirig as fast as they could. The question was asked, who de-annexed and Nisson answered the property owner did. Smith stated that their tax bill shows District 7A because they were paying on bonded indeb tedness that District had or still has. Can't order t he City of Orange to pay it. Wi nn then moved that if we are going to waive connection fee, sho u ld waive the annexation fee also. Nisson advised that we would have to pass a special resolution authorizing this property to be annexed without annexation fee. Finnell then suggested that the fee be split 50/50. Smith said he thought that it would only be proper for Orange to pay .half. Nisson also stated that the motion should be conditioned on if it is annexed. It was then stated that the motion on the floor now is to waive a ll. vw~ann7xation fees. Th~-que~tion was _ calle~ for oi; this substitute . ~/ mot.um and · a roll ca.i...L VO"(;e. was "(;aKen. 1v1otion railea. · .· ··· .. Nevil then moved to pass a resolution waiving half the annexation fees conditioned upon annexation of property. Motion was seconded. Finnell said we can't make motion state who will pay but how much to be paid. Chaput questioned why we should waive everything after t.tey haven't been paying for the last 10 years. Doesn't seem very resp.misible of District. Finnell.then answered that it was a mutual mistake o& the part of Orange and the Sanitation Districts. Nevil further adIDi sed that if those residences absg~utely refuse to annex, there will ha v~ t c be proceedings to approve election and then it is going to cost -us money to service this area. Orange is going to have to charge fee and se~ve them. Would really be a problem for the District. Nisson then referred to his memo on this subject in which he suggest~d that they should probably pass, in addition to this, an intention uo levy a charge against the City of Orange for servicing this area wbt:ii:ch is located outside the District. Then Orange will tell property Ol(il)lers they will be charging them so much per month to cover ··this service. ~fi1fFinnell called for the question, and the motion passed. t<V Nevil also moved that the Board of Dist~ict 2 declare its intent to ~Jl"1. levy a charge on the City. of Orange if they are not annexed. Motion ~y was seconded and carried. #29 -Serving Tract · 8149 in District 2 through facilities in Dist. "l Mr. Harper reviewed map in Directors' folders and background of area in question. Tract is in City of Orange and not in District 7, City of Orange has built a line which will eventually become a Master Plan sewer in District 7 when this area is annexed to District. Is no sewer service in District 2 at this time in that area. Engineers for Districts 2 & 7, REL & FAH looked at area.' Appears that this area will probably be served by Dist. 7 from a logical standpoint. Also are some other areas that would logically drain that way also. One possibility is District 2 contracting wi~h District 7 to serve this area and another possibility would be to have this area withdrawn from Dist. 2 and annexed to Dist. 7. Are certain considerations regarding this. Nevil stated that he had questioned the intent to de-~nnex just the one tract on a piecemeal basis. Would seem that this is a logical way to go but might be ways to annex the entire area. Mr. Harper said from a staff point of view our problem is that there are houses that people are living in. Under different ownerships and it may be difficult to annex all at one time. As area develops may be able to get job done. Nevil commented that it didn't appear too much of an advantage to work on a contractual basis. Smith then stated that the area eventually, from an engineering standpoint, just about had to go into District 7, or would have to cross Santiago Creek. School District property is just to the , west of that area and plans to develop soon, and they are also not in Dist. Said he thought it would be fine if the staff thought each lot should be annexed separately but should look at the full District property. Would be logical to de-annex from District 7 first. Finnell asked Nisson is there was any major stumbling block to de-annex and he answered no. Nisson then asked what the difference in tax rate was and JWS answered that it was 4¢ higher. Nisson stated that it would be better to annex all at once. A lot of expense to do it piecemeal. t -4- Nevil asked if procedure required a resolution from the Board to consent to de-annexation and then annexing to District 7. Nissen answered that if thA staff Ax~~Psses their inter.t, the ~t~ff woul~ have to work up proper steps. Would have a problem with annexat~on or connection fee. Should consider .waiving annexation fee. Should do something before there are too many property owners. Nevil then asked how they ·could get it on the table right now and moved that District 2 consent to de-annexation of this particular section or any part of it. Motion was seconded. Kowalski asked to delineate area in question and was answered that it is the area shown on map in Directors' folders. Motion was then restated and indicated that area on map was from Santiago Creek -south to our boundary line, or any portion thereof! DISTRICT 2 motion carried to consent to de-annex. DISTRICT 7 then moved to .annex this portion. Motion was seconded and carried. #30 -DISTRICT 2 adjournment . · .. Nevil called a special meeting as Orange County Water District would like action by District 2 to indicate whether they are ready to go ahead on project report on water reclamation plant at Riverside Freeway. Have to have project report in to State by March 1st. Called meeting for October 17th and it was suggested that it be at 5:30 p.m. Motion was seconded and carried. -5- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, AND 11· DISTRICT NO. 1 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 2 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 3 Directors present: Directors absent: ·DISTRICT NO. 5 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 6 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 7 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 8 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 11 Directors present: Directors absent: MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING October 10, 1973 -7:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California ROLL CALL Jerry Patterson (Chairman), Robert Battin, Kerm Rima, and Donald Saltarelli None Robert Nevil (Chairman), Dale Chaput, Ralph Clark, Norman Culver, Robert Finnell, Thomas Kowalski, John Garthe, Edward Just, Louis Reinhardt, Don Smith, Mark Steph~nson, and Donald Winn None Donald Fox (Chairman), Robert Battj_n, Thomas Blackman, Norman Culver, Jesse Davis, Roland Edwards, John Ga~the, Jack Green, Joseph Hyde, Frank Marshott, Henry Roberts, Jr., Louis Reinhardt, George Scott, Mark Stephenson, Charles Stevens, Jr., and Cor Vanderwaal -None Don Mcinnis. (Chairman), David Baker, and Carl Kymla None Ellis Porter (Chairman), Robert Battin, and Don Mcinnis None Don Smith (Chairman), Ralph Clark, Jerry Patterson, Ellis Porter, Don Mcinnj_s, and Donald Saltarelli E. Ray Quigley Carl Johnson, J~e (Chairman) and Ralph Clark Clay Mitchell Henry Duke (Chairman), David Baker, and Norma Gibbs None 10/10/73 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary, Ray Lewis,· Ted Dunn~ William Clarke, Bob Webber, Doug Preple, Rita Brown, and Carol Fontenot C. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel, Conrad Hohener, Harvey Hunt, Walt Howard, Milo Keith, and.Sat Tamaribuch'-" . A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation . Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 11 of Orange County, California, was held at 7:30 p.m., October 10, 1973. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation, the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District's Board. DISTRICTS 1, 7, & 8 Ex~erpts re ~oard Appointments received ·and filed * ~ * * * * * * * Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Minute Excerpts from the City of Tustin regarding appointment of Ralph Welsh as Alternate Director to the Boards of Directors of Districts Nos. 1 & 7; and from South Laguna Sanitary District ·regarding appointment of Roy W. Holm as Active Director and Carl Johnson, Jr. as Alternate Director of District No. 8, be receiveq and ordered filed. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded, .and duly carried: AEeroval of minutes That the minutes .of the regular meeting held September 12, 1973, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: AEproval of minutes That the minutes of th~ regular meeting held September 12, 1973,-be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, ard duly carried: Ap2roval of minutes That ~he minutes of the.regular meeting held September 12, 1973, be· approved· as mailed. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held.September 12, 1973, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 6 Mov·ed, seconded, and duly carried: AJ2proval of minutes That the minµtes of the regular meeting held September 12, 1973, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: A2;eroval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held September 12, 1973, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 8 Moved, seconded, and du:.y carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held August 8, 1973, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 11 Approval of minutes Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the minutes of the regular meeting held September 12, 1973, be ·approved as mailed. -2- ,...,, 10/10/73 ALL DISTRICTS Following a brief report of the Report of the Joint Chairman regarding the meeting Joint Chairman with officials of the Environmental Protection Agency in Washington, D.C. concerning the definition of best practicable waste treatment technology, Mr. Finnell called a meeting of the Executive Committee for 5:30 p.m., Tuesday, October 30, 1973, and invited Directors Edwards and Garthe to attend and participate in the discussions. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager The General Manager reported on the meeting held with'key officials of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and staff me~bers of the Senate Public Works Committee regarding the· definition of best practicable waste treatment technology for ocean dischargers presently being· formul~ted by EPA. Also in attendanc.e were representatives from Alaska, Hawaii, Guam and the State of Washington. District representatives also ~1et with leaders of several national conservation groups while in Washington, D.C. Orange County is the only agency that has. submitted technical data to support a District-suggested modification of· their proposed definition that will protect the marine environment with a reasonable expenditure of public funds and commitment of resources. EPA officials have acknowledged the considerable economic impact of their proposed definition of secondary treatment and have stated that the only way to change it is to a'inend the Water Pollution Control Act. However, they are reluctant to propose an amendment because by the time it proceeds through the legislative process, it might bear little resemblance to the original intent. In a meeting with a representative of Senator Muskie's office, we were advised that the Senat6r in~ends to ask the National Study Commission to review the definitions develop-ed by the Environmental Protection Agency for secondary treatment and best practicable waste treatment tecnnology and report back to the Senate Public Works Committee in the spring. It is difficult to determine at this time what influence, if any, this report will have on EPA's definitions. It ·appears at this time, howeve~, that secondary.treatment, as defined by EPA, is going to be the best practicable waste treatment technology r.equired in 1983 for deep ocean dischargers. · Mr. Harper then briefly commented on the Ocean Outfall No. 2 report which had been prepared and mailed to the Directors pursuant to their request at the. regular September meeting. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Counsel construction in the several I The General Counsel reported that most of his work during the month consisted of matters concerning rights. of way for trunk sewers under Districts. Mr. Nissan also reported that several inquiries had been received regarding the effective date of connection fees under recently adopted ordinances in Districts 2 an~ 3, and neiterated the language of the ordinances state that fees are due upon "issuance" of the building permit. He has advised those who have inquired that there is no provision for waiving the fees. -3- ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file written report of Executive Corrunittee Following a brief report by Vice Joint Chairman Porter, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the written report of the Executive Corruni ttee dated October 5, 1·973, be received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Declaring invalid the reimbursement provision of engineers' proposal re 1972 Master Plan Report Master Plan Report, is no Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That, because of changed conditions, the reimbursement provision of the '-" engineers' proposal approved February 3, 1972, for preparation of the 1972 longer valid; and, FURTHER MOVED: No credit is therefore due the Districts for fees paid John Carollo Engineers for the preparation of said-1972 Master Plan Report. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing 9eneral Manager to file request for general .maintenance permit for Treatment Plant No. 2 Treatment Plant No. 2, as ALL DISTRICTS Accepting proposal of John Carollo Engineers re Project Report fo~ advanced treatment expansion at ·Plant No. 2 .Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the General ·Manager be authorized to file with the South Coast Regional Zone Conservation Commission, a request for a general maintenance permit for recommended by the General Counsel. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the proposal submitted by John Carollo Engineers dated September .20, 1973, for engineering services in connection with preparation of a Project Report for advanced treatment expansion at Plant No. 2, as required by the State Water Resources Control Board in connection· with grant approval for 1973-74 fiscal year projects, be received, ordered filed, and accepted; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Generfi.l Manager be authorized to direct the engineers to proceed with said services on. a per diem fee basis for a·mzximum amount.not to ~xce~~ $65,000.00. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to solicit proposals for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report re treatment expansion at Plant No. 2 from the following firms: Moved, ~econded, and duly carried: That the staff be authorized to solicit. proposals for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the 1973-74 ·Project Report for advanced treatment expansion at Pl~nt No. 2 Environmental Impact Profiles Ultrasystems, Inc. URS Research Company Richard B. Terry & Asso~iates ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approving Resources Management Program That the staff report 01 proposed Resources Management Pr)gram dated September 21, 1973, be received, ordered filed, and approved; and,"-' FURTHER MOVED: That the staff be authorized to proceed with implementation of Phase I of said Resources Management Program, for a total amount not to exceed $33,000.00. -4- ALL DISTRICTS Report of staff on proposed South Coast Regional Zone Conservation Commission ocean discharge requirements 10/10/73 The General Manager reported that the South Coast Regional Zone Conservation Commission had announced a public hearing of their proposed guidelines for ocean discharge requirements. Mr. Harper commented on the proposed guidelines and advised the Boards the Districts' consulting engineers had estimated that facilities necessary to meet the requirements would cost an additional $100 to $130 million in capital investment, over and above the secondary treatment requirements, and double operating expenses. The entire cost would have to be borne by Orange County taxpayers as State and Federal construction grant assistance would not be available. · ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing members of the Boards and staff to appear ·before the South Coast Regional Zone Conservation Commission in opposition to Following a brief discussion re the position ·or the State Water Resources Control ·Board on the Coastal Commission's proposeq regulations, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: proposed discharge requirements That members of the· Boards and staff be.authorized to appear before the Coastal Zone Commission in opposition to the Commission's proposed unreasonable discharge requirements. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing General Manager to engage services of experts re testimony before the South Coast Regional Zone Conservation Commission Moved, seconded, and duly carried: " . . Tha~ subject to approval of the Joint Chairman, the General Manager be q.uthorized to engage the service.s of experts from the scientific community in connection with perparation of information and testimony before the South Coast Regional Zcne Conservation Commission with regard to their proposed discharge restrictions which exceed State Water Resources Control Board requirements; and, FURTHER MOVED: That payment for fees and incidental expenses incurred therewith be authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Directing staff to send information to cities re Coastal Zone Conservation ·commission's proposed guidelines Conservation Commission's ALL DISTRICTS · Approving enlargement .of scope of engineers' proposal re design of 46 MGD of secondary tr~atment facilities at Plant No. 1 ·Following a brief discussion, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff .be directed to forward information to the mayor of each city outlining the Districts' concern over the impact of the Coastal Zone proposed guidelines. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the letter from John Carollo Engineers dated September 26, 1973, regarding enlargement of the scope of their proposal for design of 46 MGD of secondary treatment facilities at Plant No. 1, to include design of extra work not contemplated at the time of original.design approval, be received, ordered filed, and approved; and, FURHTER MOVED: That the General· Manager be authorized to direct John Carollo Engineers to proceed with said work on a per diem· fee basis for an additional amount not to exceed $10,000.00. -5- 10/10/73 ALL DISTRICTS Convene in executive session ALL DISTRICTS Reconvene in regular session ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file Stop Notice from Electric Supplies Distributing Company re Job No. P2-20 At 7:58 p.m., the Boards convened in executive session to consider personnel matters. At 8:40 p.m., ·the Boards reconvened in regular session. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Stop Not~ce submitted by Electric Supplies Distributing Company against Mel Gorham Electric Company, Contractor for Power Reliability Project at Plant No. received and 2, Job No. P2-20, in the amount of $5,153.49, be ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Awarding purchase of Six 4-Wheel Electric Carts, Specification No. A-068 Moved, s~conded, and duly carried: That the· bid tabulation and recommenda- tion for purchase of Six (6) 4-wheel Electric Carts, Specification No .. A-068, be received and ordered filed, and that the General Manager be authorized to issue a purchase ·order to Taylor-Dunn in the amount of $9,678.00. ALL DISTRICTS Awarding purchase of Seven Compact-Type Pickup Trucks, Specification No. A-069 and ordered filed, and issue a purchase order $17,847.50. ALL DISTRICTS Receive, file, and deny claim of Walter W. Robinson re Job No. r-8-3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the bid tabuiation and recommendation for purchase of Seven (7) Compact-Type Pickup Trucks, Spe~ification No. A-069, be received that the General Manager be authorized to to Costa Mesa Datsun in the amoun~ of Moved, seconded, and duly carried: ~hat the claim dated September 18, 1973, in .the amount of $300,000.00, submitted by Walter W. Robinson, in connection with construction of Influent Metering and Diversion Structure at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. I-8-3, be received, ordered filed, and denied, as recommended by the General Counsel. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file staff progress report on Treatment Plant Construction Projects .and· ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Certification of the General Manager received and ordered filed Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff progress report dated October ~' 1973, on Treatment Plant Constru6tion Projects, be r~ceived Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the certification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them .to be in order, be received and and that he recommends authorization for payment, ordered filed. -6- ALL DISTRICTS 10/10/73 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by roll ca~l vote: Approval of Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant books That the Districts' Joint Dp~rating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant books be approved for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay:· Joint ·Operating Capital Outlay Revolving $123,231.12 419,754.60 $542,985.72 in accordance with the warrants listed on pages "I-1" through "I-4", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Adopting reaolution authorizing filing for .reimbursable federal construction grants ·The General Manager repo~ted that as a result of considerable urging from Congressmen; including the California delegation, the Senate had adopted a resolution requesting eligibility for states not previously deemed eligible because of a legal opinion of Environmental Protection Agency attorneys, for reimbursable construction grant funds for projects constructed from 1966 through 1971. As a result of the resolution, EPA.has changed their ruling, and the Districts may now be eligible for up to $3.8 million in reimbursable gr~nt funds. Following a brief discussion, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors adopt .Re~olution No. 73-169, authorizing application for reimbursable grant funds pursuant to.the provisions of the 197~ Amendments to ·the Water Quality Control Act. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of 'these minutes. DISTRICT 1 ~oved> seconded, and duly carried: Adc.i ournmen t That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourn~d at 8:45 p.m., October 10, 1973. DISTRICT 2 Receive ·and file construction grant approval from EPA re Contract No. 2-14-2 Moved, ieconded, and duly carried: That the letter from the Environmental Protection Agency dated September 21, 1973, approving construction grant to the Chino Basin Municipal Water District for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer from Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-2, be received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 2 & 3 Approving and authorizing execution of Agreement for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges with the Garden Grove Sanitary District Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the respective Boa~ds of Directors adopt Resolutions Nos. :3-152-2 and 73-153-3, approving and authorizing execution of Agreement for Collection of Sewe~ Connection Charges with the Garden Grove Sanitary District. Certified copy of these resolutions are attached hereto and made a part of these minutes . . -7- 10/10/73 DISTRICT 3 Approving and authorizing execution of Standard Agreement, and Supplement, for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges, with the City of Buena Park Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolutions Nos. 73-150-3 and 73-151-3, approving and authorizing execution of Standard Agreement for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges, and Supplement thereto, with the City of Buena Park. Certified copy of these resolutions are attacl ~ hereto and made a part of these minutes. '-"" DISTRICT 3 Approving and authorizing Execution of Agreement, and Supplement, for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges with the Stanton County Water District Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolutions Nos. 73-154-3 and 73-155-3, approving and authorizing execution of Agreement for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges, and Supplement thereto, with the Stanton County Water District. Certified 'copy of these resolutions are attached hereto and made a. part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Approving and authorizing execution of Standard Agree- ment, and.Supplement, for Collection of Sewer Connection Charge with City of Westminster Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolutions Nos. 73-156-3 and 73-157-3, approving and authorizing execution of Standard Agree~ent for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges, and .Supplement thereto, with the City of Westminster. Certified copy of these·resolutions are attached heret9 and made a part of these minutes. · DISTRICT 2 Receive and file staff progress report re Contract No. 2-14-1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff progress report dated October 4, 1973, on construction bf the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, be received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of warrants That the District's Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund warrant book be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and . directed to pay $715,603.61, in ~ccordance with the warrants listed on-page "II", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. · DISTRICT 3 Approving Rental Agreement with S & S Construction Company re Contract No. 3-17 Moved, seconded, and du~y carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 73-158-3, approving Rental Agreement (~emporary) with S & S Construction in connection with construction of the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 & 3, Contract No. 3-17. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Receive, file, and deny claim re Contract No. 3-17 That the claim dated September 11, 1973, in the amount of $700.94, in connection with the construction of the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 & 3, Contract No. 3-17, be recei ve.d, ordered filed, and denied, a·s recommended by the General Counsel. -8- . 10/10/73 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to plans and That Change Order No. 1 to the _plans specifications for and specificati9ns for the Bolsa Relief Contract No. 3-17-1 Trunk Sewer, Reach 10, and Balsa Avenue Storm Drain, Contract No. 3-17-1, authorizing a deduction of $352. 50 from the -contract with McGuire Construction, be approved. Copy of this Change Order is attached ..._.,. hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Approving Change Order No. 2 to plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-17-1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change order No. 2 to the plans and specifications· for the Balsa Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 10, and Balsa Avenue Storm Drain, Contract No. 3-17-1, authorizing a deduction oT $2,672.00 from the contract with McGuire Construction Company, be approved. Copy of this Change Order is attached hereto and ~ade a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Approving Change Order No. 3 to plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-17-1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: ~h~t Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for the Balsa Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 10, and Balsa Avenue Storm Drain, Contract No. 3-17-1, granting a time extension of 76 calendar days to the contract with McGuire Construction Company, be approved. Copy of this Change Order is· attached hereto '3.nd made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carri~d: Accepting Contract I No. 3-17-1 as complete That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 73-159-3, accepting Balsa Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 10, and Balsa Avenue Storm Drain, Contract No. 3-17-1, as complete, artd authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion upon receipt of approval from the City of Westminster. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of t~ese· minutes . DISTRICT 3 Receive and file Engineer's report re construction of remaining reaches of the ·Knott Interceptor . Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Engineer's preliminary report on constru.ction· of remaining reaches of the Knott Interceptor be received and ordered filed; and, That the staff be directed to forward copies of said report to cities through which the interceptor will be constructed, and to request comments on the· proposed alignments for report -back to the Board. DISTRICT 3 Receive and file staff progress repdrts re Contracts Nos. 3-17 and 3-18 Moved,. seconded, and duly carried: That the staff progress reports dated October 4, 1973, on construc- tion of the Knott Interceptor, a Contract No. No. 3-18, be Portion pf Reach 1 and Reaches 2 & 3, 3-17; and the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract received and ordered filed. -9- 10/10/73 DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Approval of Suspense Fund warrants working in the City, it was Following an expression of concern from Directors representing the City of Fountain Valley over the performance of a District contractor p·repently moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Districts' Suspense Fund warrant book be approved for signature of the Chairman of District No. 3, and ·that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $348,059.62, in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II"; attached hereto and made·a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of warrants That the District's Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund warrant book be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $39,296.89, in accordance with the warrants l~sted on page "I.I", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes . . DISTRICT 3 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation .District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:50 p.m., DISTRICT 5 Approving and authorizing execution of Reimbur~ement Agreement with the Irvine Company for oversizing of Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 73-160-5, approving and authorizing execution of Reimbursement Agreement with the Irvine Company for oversizing of Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer at Promontory Point. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moyed, seconded, and duly carried: Abandoning portion of Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer. That ~he Board of Directors;adopt Resolution No. 73-161-5, formally abandoning a portion of the Bayside· Drive Trunk Sewer and ordering the value thereof removed from the District's books of account. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. · DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, s~conded, and duly carried: Approval of Suspense Fund Warrants That the Districts' Suspense Fund warrant book be approved for signature of the Chairman of District No4 5, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay 55,005.91, in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of warrants That the District's Ope: ·a ting Fund warrant book be approved for signature of the Chain~n of District No. 5, and that the County Auditor be authorized and '-" directed to pay $1,563.86, in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II", attached hereto and made.a part of these minutes. -:10- . 10/10/73 DISTRICT 5 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so -adjourned at 8:51 p.m., October 10, 1973. DISTRICT 6 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this.meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6·be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:51 p.m., October 10, 1973. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Accepting proposal of Boyle Engineering re Tustin-Orange Trunk .Reaches 10 through hr That the proposal submitted by Boyle Engineering dated October 2, 1973, Orange Trunk, Reaches 10 and accepted; and, for engineering services in connection with pr~liminary design of the Tustin- through 18, be received, ordered filed, FURTHER MOVED: That the Gen.eral Manager be authorized to direct the engineers to proceed with said work for a lump sum fee of $17,350.00. Said fee shall be considered a part of the final design fee and is to be deducted therefrom upon imple- mentation of final design, with the exception of expenditures in connection with Environmental Impact Report work in the · amount of $4,000.00. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Accepting Grant of That the Board of Directors'adopt Resolution No. 73-162-7, authorizing acceptance of Grant of Easement from Schneider & Roy, for a_ permanent Easement from Schneider & Roy re extension of an Assessment District No. 1 sewer easement in connection with the extension of an Assessment District No. 1 sewer, at no cost to the District. Certified copy of this resolution is· attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of warrants That the District 1 s Operating Fund and Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund warrant books be approved for signature of the Chairman and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay: Operating Fund Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund $ 140.00 45,666.12 $45,806.12 in accordance with the warrants listed on page "III", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Ordering annexation of territory to the District (Annexation No. 31) Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the.Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 73-167-7, ordering annexation of approximately 6.8 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Santiago Canyon Road and Orange Park Boulevard (Proposed Annexation No. 31 - Salem Lutheran Church Annexation to County Sanitation District· · No. 7). Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -11- 10/10/73 DISTRICT 7 Ordering annexation of territory to the District (Annexation No. 33) Moved, .seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 73-168-7, ordering annexation of approximately 1/2 acre of territory to the District in the vicinity of Clearview Lane and Cowan Heights Drive (Proposed Anneiation No. 33 -Hernandez Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Certified copy ~ of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 8 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 8 be adjourned. The· Chairman then declared the meeting so. adjourned at 8:53 p.m., October 10, 1973. DISTRICT 11 Abandoning portion of Newland Avenue Force Main (Banning Trunk Sewer) Moved, s·econded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adop~ Resolution No. 73-163-11, formally abandoning a portion of the Newland Avenue Force Main (Banning Trunk Sewer) and ordering the value thereof removed from the District's books of account. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 11 Making negative declaration re environmental impact of Slater Avenue Sewer Pump Station Wet Well Repair Wet Well Repair will not environment, be received " Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Thai· the Environmental Impact Assessment prepared by the staff concluding that the proposed Slater Avenue Sewer Pump Station· have a significant effect upon the and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board.of Directors adopt Resolution No. 73-164-11, making a negati~e declaration and providing for notice thereof, relative to the effect on the environment of the proposed Slater Avenue Sewer Eump Station Wet Well Repair. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. · DISTRICT 11 Moved) seconded, and duly.carried: ·Receive and file comments from agencies re Draft That the comments received from the following agencies pursuant to the Draft Environmental Impact Report for proposed Sanitary Sewer and Environmental Impact Report on Contract No. 11-12 Ap~urtenarices in Slater Avenue from Newland Avenue to G6thard Street, Contract ·No. 11-12, be received and ordered filed: California Regional Water Quality Control Board O~ange County Flood Control District Department of Fish and Game Department of Public Health Air Resources Board State Water Resources Control Board -12- DISTRICT 11 Receive, file, and approve Environmental Impact Report re Contract No. 11-12 10/10/73 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the r'inal Environmental Impact Report for Sanitary Sewer ~n~ Appurtenances in Slater Avenue from Newland Avenue to Gothard Street, Contract No. 11-12, be received, ordered filed, and approved. DISTRICT 11 Approving plans and -specifications for Contract No. 11-12 Moved, ~econded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 73-165-11, approving plans and specifications for Sanitary Sewer and Appurtenances in Slater Avenue from Newland Avenue to Gothard Street, Contract No. 11-12; authorizing advertising for bids; and authorizing filing Notice of Determination in accordance with Local Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. _DISTRICT 11 Authorizing execution of Grant of Easement to the City of Huntington Beach Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 73-166-11, authorizing execution of Grant of Easement to the City of Huntington Beach for street improvements adjacent to the Newland-Hamilton Pump Station~ Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 11 AdJournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeiin~ so adjourned at 8:54 p.m., October 10, 1973. DISTRICT 2 Actions on proposed Annexation No. 8 - Tract No. 4980 The General Manager and General Counsel reviewed for the Board the ~ircumstances surrounding the request from the City of Orange-to annex approximately ~.205 acres to the District in the vicinity of Mallard· Street and Collins Avenue (Proposed Annexation No. 8 -Tract No. 4980). The territory, through an apparent oversight, was not annexed to ~he District at the time it was annexed to the City of Orange and has, therefore,·not been taxed for sewer~ge service provided by District No. 2. Chairman Nevil reported th0t he and the District staff had met with Councilman Smith of Orange and members of their staff to attempt to resolve the matter. After ihe report of Chairman Nevil, the Board entered into a lengthy discussion concerning the propriety of fees to be charges and the alternate solutions available to the Board, dur~ng which the following actions were taken: Moved, seconded, and du:i.y carried: Receive and file request for annexation of Tract No. 4980 That the letter from the City of Orange dated October 1, 1973, requesting annexation of Tract.No. 4980 to the District, and requesting waiver of annexation fees, be received and ordered filed. -13- 10/10/73 Waiving connection fees for Tract Moved, seconded, and duly carried: No. 4980 That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No~ 73-170-2, decla~ing special exception for Tract No. 4980 and waiving connection fees therefor. Certified copy of this Resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Denying request to waive annexation fees for Tract No. 4980 Following a motion and a second to requir~ payment of full annexation fees on proposed annexation of Tract No. 4980, a substitute motion was made and seconded that the request from the City of Orange for waiver of annexation fees be approved. The question was then called for on the substitute motion, and following a roll call vote, the General Counsel announced that the motion had failed to pass. Approving initiation of proceedings to annex Tract No. 4980 and establishing annexation fees therefor Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No·. 73-149-2, authorizing. initiation of proceedings to annex ·approximately 8.205 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Mallard Street and Collins Avenue (Proposed Annexation No. 8 -Tract No. 4980 to County Sanitation District No. 2) and setting annexation fees therefor in the amount of $196.50 per acre, pursuant to the declaration of a special exception fur said annexation. Declaring intent to levy a sewer service charge if Tract No. 4980 is not annexed Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby declares its intent to levy·a sewer service charge in the amount of $10 per unit per month if proposed Annexation No. 8 -Tract No. 4980 to County Sanitation District No. 2 js not completed. DISTRICTS 2 & 7 The· General Manager reviewed for the Directors the letter received from .the City.of Orange dated August 27, . 1973~ requesting sewerage service for· an area in District No. 2 through the facilities of District No. 7. The territory in question is in Declaring intent to adjust District boundaries relative to sewerage service the Santiago Creek. vicinity, and because of the drainage of the area, it appears that the property can most logically be served by District No. 7. The City has requested the respective Districts to consider de-annexing the territory from District No. 2 and· annexing it to District No. 7. The Board then entered into a general discussion of the alternative methods of resolving the matter, during which the Districts' General Counsel reviewed the legal considerations. After the discussion, the following actions ~ere taken: I DISTRICT 2 Declaring intent to ·de-annex territory in the vicinity of Santi.ago Creek Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the.Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 hereby declares its intent to de-annex the territory in the vicinity of S~n~iago Creek, whic~ can most logically be served by District No. 7, provided, however, that said territory is annexed by District No. 7. -14- DISTRICT 7 Declaring intent to annex territory in the vicinity of Santiago Creek 10/10/73 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 hereby declares its intent to annex territory presently within District No. 2, which can most logically be served by District No. 7, provided, however, that said territory be de-annexed from District No. 2; and, DISTRICT 2 FURTHER MOVED: That District No. 7 hereby declares its intent to waive annexation acreage fees for said territory but that connection fees shall be due and payable prior to init~ation of annexation proceedings. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation.Distr~ct No. 2 be adjourned to October 17., 1973, at 5:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:27 p.m., October 10, 1973. DISTRIC 1I1 7 Adjournment Moyed,_ seconded, and. duly carried: That this meeting of the Bo~rd of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. ·The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:27 p.m., October 10, 1973. WARRANT NO. 21242 21243 21244 "1 245 . ,_,246 21247 21248 21249 21250 21251 21252 21253 21254 21255 21256· 21257 21258 21259 21260 21261 21262 21263 21264 21265 21266 21267 21268 21269 ?1270 ~271 21272 21273 21274 21275 21276 21277 21278 212r-(9 21280 21281 21282 21283. 21284 21285 21286 21287 21288 21289 21290 ' 21291 21292 21293 21294 ?1295 ~296 ci297 21298 21299 213J:) 213~)1 2130'2 213C)3 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF All Bearing Service, Inc., Bushings, Seals & Bearings American Lock & Supply, Inc., Hardware City of Anaheim, Power Analytical Research Laboratories, Sample Analysis Artemis Distributors, Cleaner Bearing Specialty Company, Bearings John G. Bell Company, Valves Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair Bird-X, Inc., Ultrasonic Reoeller Blower Paper Company, Operating Supplies Don Bogart, Employee Mileage Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Magneto Repair Brenne~-Fiedler & Assoc., Inc., Comp~essor Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams Bruning Division, Drafting Equipmen~ $ Business & Institutional Furniture Co., Office Equipment Cal Glass for Research, Inc., Ecological Research Supplies Cal State Seal Company, Seals · California Auto Collision, Inc~, Truck Repair California Collator Sales, Office Supplies T. V. Carter Co., Equipment Repair Brian Chuchua's, Truck Parts Coast Insurance Agency, Liability Insurance Premiums College Lumber Company, Inc., Building Materials Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electrfcal Supplies Constructors Supply Company, Hardware Paul Cooper, Grit R~moval (3 Months Net) Copeland Motors, Inc., Truck· Parts County of Orange, Printing Mr. Crane, Crane Rental R. J. Currie, Employee Mileage Crest Leasing Corp., Leased Vehicles Daily Pilot, Bid Notice E-070 & E-071 Datacraft, Inc., Equipment Rental C. R. Davis Supply Co., Equipment P~rts De Guelle & Sons Glass Co.,. Glass Del Monte/Mark Thomas Hyatt Hous~, CASA Conferenc Expense Department of Governmental Services;. Highway Specs Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling Dominguez Marine & Industrial Supply Co., Valves Don's Lawnmower. Shop, Equipment Parts Dutch Stark Company, Equipment Parts Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies & Forms Electronic Business Machines, Office Equipment Eliffs Art Shop, M~p Supplies . . · Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring (MO 12-14-66) Engine & Compressor Supply Co., Sales Tax Envirotech Corp.J Pump Parts FMC Corporation, Shaker & Conveyor Parts Fibre Glass Evercoat Co., Inc., Maintenance Supplies AMOUNT 332.75 2J6.49 26.34 127.00 211.16 230.67 1,112.95 78.0C) lJJ.96 43.88 38 .10 523.lJ 436.82 50 .OJ 95.12 102.00 520.46 149.23 81.80 17.81 90.QO 4.70 13,811.00 100.69 ·115.52 259.73 ,2,872.04 94.98 26.50 685 .88 10.50 147.28 8.85 35.00 205.19 25.93 5.00 6.06 129.75 829.95 23.69 64.12 869.J8 83. J5 "181.26 Robert Finnell, Secondary Treatment Meeting Exp .• {MO 4-11-73) Fischer'& Porter Company, Telemetering Supplies 2, 355. ~Y) 6.25 158.32 l,003.6L~ 127.88 25. JO 582 .10 2Jl+. 31+ 46.SJ 5. 911 227.90 2,122.81 6,689.88 . 6 .15 Fisher Controls Company, Compressor Parts France Products, Gaskets City of Fullerton, Water . Garden Gro7e Lumber & Cement Co., Building Materials General Telephone Company Georgia Pacific, Chlorine (Cont. l~l-73) Golden State Freieht Service, Freight M. E. Gray Company, Engine Parts a·~··aybar Electric Company, Inc., Electr1c Supplies Halopoff & Sons, Inc., Raise Manhole I-1 .15~.7~ 1.~ '.)}~ • '.).~~ 125.J0 WARRANT NO. --------- 21304 213::>5 21306 21307 21308 21309 2131::> 21311 ·21312 21313 21314 21315 21316 21317 21318 •. 21319 2132::>· 21321 21322 21323 21324 21325 213"26 21327 21328 21329 21330 21331 21332 21333 21334 21335 21336 21337 21338 21339 21340 21341 21342 2131+3 21344 21345 21346 213"47. 21348 21349 2135::> 21351 21352 21353 2'Jl i:::4 _) _,, 21355 2l?t::;6 ...)..,, 21357 21358 21·~i:::9 ..J../ 2136::> 21361 21?,62 21~6~ 21~64 ?1")6~ ·-.._) _,, 21?66 21?67 21368 IN FAVOR OF Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting & COD Expenses Haul Away Containers, Trash Disposal Hertz Car·'Leasing Corp., Leased Vehicle Hewlett Packard, Equipment Repair Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies Hundley Company, Inc., Controls Pam Huffman, Employee Mileage City of Huntington Beach, Water Inland Nut & Bolt Co., Hardware International Business Machines, Office Supplies International Harvester Co., Truck Parts Jensen Instrument Co., Controls Kahl Scientific Instrument Corp., Equipment Repair Keily ~ipe Company, Pipe Supplies . Keenan Pipe & Supply .Company, Pipe Supplies King Bearing, Inc., Seals, Bearings; & V-Belts Kleen-Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tool Repair & Equip. Parts L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Rental - Larsen-Hogue, Electrical Starter Parts Lawless Detroit Diesel, Equipment Parts Judy Lee, Employee Mileage $ . AMOUNT 193 .81· 150.C>O 795 .66 53.08 1,546.47 242.,..,- 19.~. 8.88 t:::92 -.k ...., • j_,,1 38.16 20.23 485.21 241.15 1,625.02 1,335.88 265. ::>2 397 .89 1::>7.23 606.00 ·2, 151. 07 Lewis Bros. Battery, Batteries Kris Lindstrom, Secondary Treatment Meeting Exp. (MO 4-11-73) Los Angeles Chemical Co., Chemicals "t 1,114.78 14.71 27.30 52.89 53 .15 784.40 ·116 .60 R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc.~ Paving Materials John M. McCullough, Employee Mileage Larry W. McLemore, Employee ~ile·age Mc Master-Carr, Hardware Majestic Fasteners Company, Hardware John B. Moore Corp., Solvent Morgan Equipment Co., Truck Parts J. Mosher, Employee Mileage · Nalco Chemical Co., Cleaners Nates Saw & Lawnmower Shop, Saw Repair National Lumber & Supply Inc.,·Building Materials Newark Electroincs, Electric su·pplies City of Newport Beach, Water Newport Supply Co., Hardware c. Arthur Nissan, Gen'l. Counsel Retainer & Qtrly. Chgs. Noland Paper Com9any, Reproduction Paper Occidental College, Marine Ecology Trawl Orange County R~diotelephone, Page Rental Osterbauer Compressor Service, Compressor Parts Orange County Water Works; Water Pacific Scientific Co., Transmitter, Pacific Teleohone Co. · Ron Parker, ~mployee Mileage Pneumatic Machinery Co., Compressor Parts Postmaster, Postage The Lee Potter Company, Inc., Maintenance Supplies Douglas 1E. Preble, Employee Mileage Rainbow Disoosal Co., Trash Disposal Reynolds AJ.t1minum Supply Co., Steel The Riley Co., El2ctric Supplies Jack H. Ross, Employee Mileage Rowland Signs, Signs S & J Chevrolet, Truck Parts . Scmd Dollar Dnslr:ess Forms, Printing Santa A~a Blue Print Co., Printing Santa Ana Book Store, Inc., Manuals· . Sar ta Anc~ -:.:J ~-etric Motors, M:Jtor Rewind Scientific Prod~:.cts, Lab Supplies City of Seal Beach, Wate~ I-2 82.74 33.06 78.30 8.P 7 26.~ 200.11 19.80 368.22 18.::>0 135.66 22.89 14.54 65.77 1,508".58 219.71 375. JJ 24.77 71.37 23.98 419.25 462.42 9.9::> 34.97 . 4'JJ.JJ . 145.58 47.22 ' 4::>.'J') 1,067.28 316.'.?8 r-.3~ _,, . 2::>.:J 31.Go l ""'l ,....P. j .O"J . 51. 77 i:::1 (·-)? . _,, .. ....) Li '"'r::: 8)k t J _,,. _,, 158.2::> 21~611 WARRANT NO. 21369 21370 21371 21372 21373 ' ,..., 374 ~375 . 21376 21377 21378 21379 2138J 21381 21382 21383 21384 21385 21386 21387 21388 21389 21390 21391 21392 21393 21394 21395 21396 21397 21398 I'), 399 ~4JJ 21401 214')2 21403 214.J4 21485· 21406 214~Y"( 21408 214J9 214lc:> 21411 IN FAVOR OF Seal Black~ Inc., Paving Materials $ Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies John Sigler, Employee Mileage Signal Flash Company, Inc., Barricade Rental South Orange Supply, Hardware Southern Cal~fornia Edison Southern California Gas Company Southern California Water Co. South~est Processors, 011 Disposal & Removal Sparkletts Drinl{ing Water Corp., Bottled Water Speed-E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard .Concrete Materials, Concrete Standard Oil Co., Gasoline · State Compensation Insurance Fund, Workmans Comp. Premium Sully Miller Contracting Co., Paving Materials Surveyors Service.Co., Survey Equipment T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment.Parts Tiernan's .Office Equipment, Adder Repair Title Insurance & Trust Co., Title Report Tony's Building Materials, Inc.,·Building Materials Transport Clearings, Freight Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Steel Tubesales, Tubing J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Fan -Union Oil Company, Gasoline Union Oil Company, Gasoline United Auto Parts, Truck Parts ·utilities Supply Co., Tools & Hardware VWR Scientific, Equipment Repair & Lab Supplies Vaniman Camera, Photo Supplies & Processing Garland A. Walsh, Tools Ward & Harrington, Building Materials Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc., Engine Parts Robert A. Webber, Employee Mileage Western Salt Company, Salt Western Fastener Company, Hardware Russ-Wold, Employee Mileage World Travel Bureau, Inc., Various Mtg .. Travel Expenses Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage James Wybenga, Employee Mileage Xerox Corp., Reproduction Services Zep Manufacturing Co., Janitorial Supplies Zodiac Paper Co., Reprodu~ti9n Supplies AMOUNT 28.36 428.35 62.22 15. 75 48.3J 32,123.5:) 69:).83 3.21 1, lJ:). 36 80.55 242.13 160.82 237.59 18,325.82 165.69 72.61 24.80 19. 50 75.oa · 174.90 61.61 387.57 363 .82 302.l'J 1,257.64 72.77 ·429. 38 1,406.92 271.66 89.84 33.54 348.91 ' 1, 188. 43 36.9:) 97.12 449.24 22.2::> 1,575.99 53.46 23.70 848.::>8 61.59 ·116. 39 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING $ 123,231.12 I-3 WARRANT NO. 21412 21413 21414 21415 21416 21417 21418· 21419. 2142J 21421 21422 21423 21424 21425 21426 21427 21428 . 21429 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Bruning Division, Drafting Equipment $ John Carollo Engineers, Engineering-Plant Constr. Constructors Supply Co., Machine Equipment & Tools Daily Pilot, Bid Notices A-068 & A-069 · Carlos L. Doyle, Operations Consultant Pl-16 E.T.I. & Kordick, Contractors I-8-3 & P2-ll-l Fischer & Porter Co., Flow Meter Grillias, Pirc, Rosier & Alves, Arch. Serv. Pl-16 Lloyd D. Hedenland, Operations Consultant Pl-16 Hemisphere Constructors, Contractor P2-21 James E. Hoagland Co. & Hoagland Engr. Co., Contr. Pl-9-1 LBWS, Inc., Welding Tools J. Ray Construction Company, Contractor J-13 Rutan & Tucker, Special Counse-1 -J-1~ Litigation J. G. ~ucker & Son, Inc., Fan ·Twining Laboratories, Testing J-13, ·P2-21 & I-8-3 United Reprographics, Inc., Printing F. T. Ziebarth & Ziebarth & Alper, Contractor J-4-1 AMOUNT 500.08 66,357.79 6 ~~ ~9 ~../ . ....; 8 .'." - 40J.~ . 89, 495.5J . 218.39 4,013.74 312.00 77,513.94 86,lOJ.00 181.79 66,905.30 1,236.73 819.38 352.80 . 243. 57 24,440.00 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING $ 419,754.60 TOTAL JOINT OPERARING & CORF $ 542,985.72 I-4 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 21430 21431 .21432 211 1 ')'3 ~l~ 21435 21436 21437 21438 21439 21440 21441 21442 d.443 21444 21445 County of Orange, Compaction Test 2-14-1 Lowry and Associates, Engineering Design and Survey 2-15, Construction Survey 2-14-1 San Diego Pipeline Co., Permanent Easement 2-14-2 Sully Miller Contracting Co., Contractor 2-14-1 Twining Laboratories, Pipe Testing 2-14-1 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering 3-17-1, Preliminary Engineering 3-20, 3-21, & ·Construction Survey 3~17, 3-17-1, 3-18 County of .Orange, Compaction Test 3-.17-1, Excavation Permit 3-18 · McGuire Construction, Contractor 3-17-1 A. G. Tutor Co., Inc & N. M. Saliba Co., Contractor 3-18 Twining Laboratories, Pipe Testing 3-17-1 DISTRICTS NOS 3 & 11 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF County of Orange, Compaction Test.3-17 City of Fountain Valley, Street Striping 3-17 J. F. Shea Co., Inc., Contractor 3-17 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF City of Newport Beach, Connection Fee Collection DISTRICTS NOS 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Shuirman Simpson, Engineering and Constr~ction Survey 5-19 A. G. Tutor Co., Inc & N. M. Saliba Co., Contractor 5-19 -II- AMOUNT '$. 127.81 34,066.90 3,500.00 677,895.00 13.90 $ 715,603.61 $ 14,905.25 234.39 17,608.55 6,507.00 41. 70 $ 39,296.89 $ 119.03 730.59 34-7,210.00 $ 348,059.62' $ $ 4,913.50 50, og2. LJ.1 WARRANT NO. DIWrRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 21446 State of California, Annexation Processing Fee, Annexation No. 31 21447 State of California, Annexation Processing Fee, · Annexation Noo 33 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 21448 Bo-Mar Construction Company, Contractor 7-5-lR -III- $ $ AMOUNT. 70.00 70.0° '--'' . 140.00 45,666.12 $ 45,806.12