HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973-09-12COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID .OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
September 6, 1973
\
TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11
Gentlemen:
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange
County, California, will be held:
WEDNESDAY EVENING, SEPTEMBER·12; 1973
AT 7: 30 p IM I .
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
Tentative adjournment prior to next regular meeting:
Executive Committee -5:30 p.m., September 25, 1973
---------·---------
MANA GER 'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
Post Office Box B 127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain V a ll ey, Calif., 92708
Tel ephones:
of Orange County, Califo.rnia
JOINT BOARDS
REGULAR MEETING
Wed nesday , September 12, 1973
7 :30 p .m.
Area Code 71 4
540-2910
962-24 11
The following is a brief explanation of the more
important non -ro utin e items which appear on the enc l osed
agenda and which are not o therwise se lf-explanatory. Warrant
lists a r e not attached to the agenda sinc e they are made up
imm ediately preceding the meeting but will appear in the
supplemental agenda available at the meetin g . The Execut ive
Committee did not meet dur ing the month of August. ·
Di st rict No. 7
No. 4 -El e cti on of Chairman .
Chairman Clifton Mil l er has ac c epted a prominent pos ition
with the Universi·ty of Houston , Texas , and has submitted hi s
r esignat i on to the Tustin City . Cow1cil effec tive August 31st .
Therefore , it will be neces~ary for t h e Board t o e l ect a new
Chairman .
J o in t Boa r ds
No . ·9 Consent Calendar .
The fo llowing agenda items fall into thi s category in
accordance with the definition established by the Boards :
. (a ) Att end an c e a t National Mee tin g of Wat e r
Po llution Contro l Federation in Cl eve l and .
It i s r ecommended that t he General Manager
b e .authoriz e d to send on e staff member· to
t he annual me eting of this organization
which represents al l aspects of the waste
treatment and water poll ution control fi e l ds
in this country and several foreign countries .
We h ave been active in thi s organi zation and
their conferences and exhibits have p r oved
to be ext r emely valuable to the Di s tric ts .
(b) Authorizing Payment to Southern Ca l ifornia
Edison Company for Engineering Design .
The design engineers for the 46 mgd activated
sludge plant have been in contact with the
Edison Co mpany concerning the power require -
ments necessary to operate the planned secondary
treatment facility at Plant No . 1 . They have
been advised by the Edison Company that to
meet the construction schedule of th~ Dist ricts,
it will be necessary for the company to begin
engineering design in connection with the instal-
lation of a 66 KV to a 12 KV substation on the Districts '
property immediately . The company requires that the
Districts agree to cover their engineering costs up to
a maximum of $3,500 in the event the project is sub -
sequently abandoned .
( c) and ( d) Awarding Purchase Orders for Advertised
Work and Materials, Specification Nos .
P-002 and E-069 .
(e)
(f)
It is recommended that Purchase Orders f or requir e d
mate r ials described in the agenda for Specification
Nos . P ~002 and E-069 be awarded to the named lowest
responsible bidder?.
Rebuild No . 1 Engj_ne at Plant No . 1, Specification
No . PW -031.
On September 5th, the Districts opened competitive
bids to r e build this engine . The b ids were co n -
siderably higher than the staff estimates the work
can be accomplished for . Attached to the agenda
supporting material is the staff's memorandum
r ecommending that all bids be rej e cted and that
the work .be pe r formed using District force s. This
appears to be in the best interest of the Districts
because of a possible saving o f over $6 ,ooo .
Authori zing the General Manager to Advertise fo r
Acquisition of Three Rep l acement Ex pansion J oints .
It is recomme nded that the action appearing on the
cons e nt calendar (f) be authorized to acquire t hre e
replac e me nt piping expansion joints for the Plant
No . 1 Headworks, in an amount not to exceed $3,300
plus tax and freight .
-2 -
No . 11 -Report on Litigation, Job No . J-10 .
On February 14, 1973, the Boards authorized employment
of Garvin F . Shallenberger, of Rutan. and Tucker, to represent
the Districts concerning litigation resulting from the con -
struction of Ocean Outfall No . 2 by Peter Kiewit Sons ' Company .
Mr . Shallenberger will report on the case developments to
date and answer questions from the Board members .
No . 13 -Requesting Proposal fo~ Project Report for
75 mgd Advanced Treatment .
The Districts have just received notification from the
State ·water Resources Control Board to proceed with the prepara-
tion of a Project Report for the fisca l year 1 973-74 Clean Wa t er
Construction Grants. Our agency has a project to expand Plant
. No . 2 facilities, including provisions for 75 mgd advanced
waste treatment . Before any proposed construction of treatment
faciliti es can be considered for State and Fede ral grant
assistance, a detailed Project Report must be filed with the
.state . This report does not involve the design of the project,
but rather the evaluation of various treatment methods and a
se l ection of the processes to be utilized . The letter, whic h
is enclosed in the agenda material . specifies that if this
project is to r e main on the 1973-74 priority list and receive
cons~deration for funding, the Project Report .with all support -
ing documents must be submitted by. March 1, 1 974 . Since muc h of
the information which is required for the Project Report is being
compiled by the Districts' ·treatment plant engineers in a Master
Pl an Report, i t is the staff 's recommendation that a proposal be
·solicited from them to prepare the Project Report for review and
recommendation by the Exec utive Committee at the Octobe r Joint
Board meeting .
No .. 15 -Communication from Orange County Water Manage -
ment Agency .
We have received a communication from the Orange County
Water Management Agency suggesting that the Sanitation
District s consider possible memb ership in the agency . It
is recommended that the matter be referred to the Executive
Committee for study and r ecomm e ndation .
No . 16 -Report of Special Committee on Feasibility of
El ectronic Data Pr ocessing .
The Committee will report its r ecomme ndation on the
selection of a qualified firm to conduct a study o f the needs
of the Districts concerning the es tablis hment of an electronic
data processing system . As reported earlier, the Comnittee
has met on several occasions and is currently revi ewin g pro-
posals from six firms . Chairman Stevens wi ll present the
Committee's recommendation to the· JoiDt Boa r ds on Septembe r
12th .
-3-
Dist ricts Nos . 2 and 3
No . 25 -Approving Standard Agreements for Collection
of Sewer Connection Charges, and Staff Progress
Report .
I ncluded with the agenda material is a progress report
conce r ning the number of cities which have approved standard
a g r eements for collection· of the newly -adopted District sewer
connection charges . The staff desires directio·n from the
Boards as to what alternative steps can be taken in the event
any of the remaini ng unsigned cities choose not to enter into
the agreements providing for the collection of the Districts '.
c onnection charges .
Di str ict No . 3
No . 26 -Resolutions Authorizing Annexation Proceedings
t o Annex Approximately 155 Acres to the District .
On August 9 , 1 972, the Board approved, in principle, the
annexation of this territory to the District and established
a n annexation fee of $97,561 .17 . The two resolutions appear -
ing in the agenda authorize the initiation of annexation
proc ee dings for the property . It is the staff 's recommenaa-
tion that the resolutions be approved .
District No . 5
Nos . 32 and 33 -Closeout of Contract No . 5 -19 .
Th ese a~enda items will close ·out Contract No . 5 -19,
Sewer Trunk 'Bu -Unit 8, Pacific Coast Highway i;:orce Main .
(32 -a) Change Order No . 5 .
Five items constitute Change Order No . 5 in
the amount of $47,751 . The major item , $23 ,741 ,
is for pre mium time requir e d by the Contractor
to p e rform the work during . the evening hours .which
was not originally specifi ed in the En croachment
Permit issued by the Division of Highways . Thi s
change was required by the City of Newport Beach
and the Division of Highways to better accommodate
the tra ffic on the Pacific · Coast Highway . Also
required was additiona l struc tura l asphaltic
concrete paving, because the Division o f High ways
was unable to schedule their channelization con-
tract to proceed immediat ely after t he completion
of the District 's Fo rce Main· faci l i ty as planned .
Added costs of approximately $15,000 resul ted
from utility interferences which were not
de l ineated on the contract plans . Uti.li ty records
were not definitive at the time of the preparation
of the plans. A 12 11 high-pressure gas main inter-
fered with portions of the gravity sewer on the
south side of the 11 Arches 11 and had to be .relocated
requiring the installation of additional manholes
to avoid conflicts. In addition, the valve vault
at the Rocky Point Pump Station had to be relocated
and modified to avoid utility conflicts.
$7,478 was for additional work to remove concrete
debris located near the abutment of the 11Arches 11
overcrossing . This debris was the foundation and
remains of an old ab~ndoned glass factory .
An extra jacking pit was required for the instal-
lation of the reinforced plastic mortar lining
in the existing VCP gravity sewer in the Coast
Highway. This additional pit was required
becaus e there was a change j_n grade in the
existing gravity sewer, adding $1 ,423 to the
contract.
(32-b) Change Order No . 6 •.
This is a regular Change Order adjust"ing the
final date of acceptance of .the contract and
it allows time extensions due to changed con -
ditions and inclement weather .
It is r ec ommended that Change Orders Nos. 5 ·and 6 be
approved, and that Res olution No . 73-137 -5 accepting the
contract as complete be adopted .
District No . 2
Nos. 44 and 45 -Communications from City of Anaheim and
City of Placentia .
The communication fro m the City of Anaheim approves the
District's Environmental Imp act Statement regarding the Santa
Ana River Inte rc e ptor from Katella to La Pa lma Avenues. The
communic at ion from the City of Placentia approves the route
selections for District No . 2 Master Pl an sewer fac ilities
to be located within the City of Plac e ntia.
-5-
No. 4 6 -Approving Agreement with Southern Pacific
Trans portation Company .
The resolution appear ing in the agenda authorizes
execution of an agreement with the Southern Pacific Transpor -
tation Company to acquire an easement to cross Southern
Pacific 's right of way in conjunction with the installation
of a 63 11 sewer line on Contract No . 2-1 4 -2 . The easement is
be ing granted to t he District at no cost .
No. 47 ·-Autho r izing Executi on of Agreement with the
City of F ountain Va lley re ~ Construction of Slater-Se g erstrom
Bri dge .
Previously, the Boa rd adopted Resolution No . 73-36 -2,
authorizing execution of an agreement with the City of Fountai n
V~lley to accommodate construction of t he Slat e r -Segerstrom
Brid ge over the District '.s Santa Ana Ri ver Interceptor , at no
cost to the District . Subsequently, it was determined that
significant changes would be requir ed in the constr uction and ·
laying of the pipe to support the addit i onal over -b urden .
Thi s additional work will be done by the Contractor for a l ump
·sum of $25 ,000, which is reflected in Chan ge Order No . 1 0 . The
City of F ountain Valley has agreed to pay $22,000 of t he total
Change Order if the District wi ll obligate itself in the amount
of $3 ,000 .
It is r ecommended that execution of a new agreement be
authori·zed, providing for a limited financial participation
by the' District in an amount not to exceed $3 ,000 .
No . 48 -Change Orde.rs Nos . 8, 9, and 1 0 , Contract No .
2 -14-1.
(48 -a) Change Order No . 8 .
Included in this Change Order is the additional
cost of $18,684 for the removal and the relocation
of the City of Orange water main and additional
support for the Metropolitan Water District water
main which were in conflict with the installation
of the interceptor sewer . The exact locations and
appurtenant supporting structures were not dete r -
mined until exposed dur ing construction . Also in-
cluded is the removal and disposal of debris,
which was discovered during the excavation , of
old dump site material . This material was un -
suitable for backfill and interfered with
construction.
-6 -
Included in Change Order No. 8 is a deduction
in the amount of $7 ,250 which r eflects the
savi ngs because of contractural changes
benefiting the Contractor 's operation but not
affecting the final installation of the trunk
sewer . The Cont ractor was reliev ed of the
respon s ibility of tunneling under the Southern
Pacific Rai lroad crossing and the tunneling
underneath a reinforced concrete box storm drain
because of changes in requirements of the
affected agencies . The net Change Order adds
$11 ,434 to the contract .
(48 -b) Change Order No . 9 .
This Change Order is for the p l acement and
compacti on of 1,005 cubi c yards of additional
stabilization base rock material. wh ich is
specified as a stipulated price item in the
proposal . The placement of this material was
requir ed because of uns~able material found in
the trench excavati on . The Change Order adds
$7,537 to the contract.
(48 -c) Change Order No . 10 .
This Change Order adds $25 ,000 to the contract
for the necessary structural changes in the pipe
bedding to accommodate t he prop osed s·l a ter -
Segerstrom bridge crossing of the Santa Ana
River as previously r eport ed for Agenda Item
No . 4 7 .
No . 49 -Gr ant of Easement f r om San Diego Pipeline
Company..
The ac tion appearing on the agenda authorizes the
acceptanc e of a Grant of Easement from the San Di ego Pipe l ine
Company for right of way to construct a segme nt of Contract
No . 2 -14-2 at a cost of $3,500 . It is the staff 's recommenda-
tion t hat the action be approved .
No . 50 -Request from the City of Orange to Serve Tract
No . 8149 through Facilities Locat e d wi t h in Dis trict No . 7 .
The Public Works Department of the City of Orange has
requested appr oval to serve a proposed subdivision which li es
within Di strict No . 2 through facilities which are in District
No. 7 . It is recommended that the Dis trict's staff meet with
-7 -
personnel from the Or ange Public Works Department to discus s
what sewer facilities can accommodate this development. Tract
No . 8 149 is in a drainage area which is tributary to the
District Nq . 2 Ol ive Subtrunk Sewe r .
District No . 7
Nos . 55 and 56 -Communications r e : Contract No . 7 -5 -l R •
. We have received two communications regard i ng unpaid
obligations of the contractor for the Westside Relief Trunk,
Contract No . 7 -5 -lR .· The actions appearing on the agenda
r eceive and file the communicati9ns .• _
Nos . 57 and 58 -Cl oseout of Cont ract No . 7 -5 -lR.
These agenda items are necessary to close out Contract
No . 7-5 -l R. The following is an exp l anat i on of the three
Change Orders . It i s recommended that a Cl oseout Ag r eement
with the contractor be authorized with re gard to Change Orde r s
Nos. 4 and 5 :
(57 -a) Change Ord er No . 3.
This Change Or der is a r egular Change Order which
reflec ts the final quantit i es of work performed
by the Contractor and adjusts the final contract .
Change Order No . 3 adds $2 ,463 to the contract .
(57 -b) Change Ord e r No . 4 .
Because of the difficulty encountered by the
Contractor in achieving the necessary compaction
r equirements , it is the staff 's recommendation
that the Contractor be re l ~eved of any settlement
associated with the trench compaction a n d that a
sum of $12,500 be deducted f r om the f i nal contract
price . The material in which the sewer was being
placed was a saturated clay material and to achieve
a relative compaction of 90 percent became quite
difficu l t . The relative compaction of the un -
disturb ed soil outside the trench area was less
than the requirements and it is felt that the
District , in assuming the Contractor 's liability,
will not sustain a cost greate r t han the deducted
amount . This recomm endation is also to mitigate
the disturbanc e and inconvenience t o thos e affected
by the construction in the Cities of Santa Ana and
Tustin . Also included in this Change Orde r is an
-8-
agreed assessed liquidated damage in the
amount of $6 ,ooo . The net effect of Change
Order No •. 4 is to reduce the contract price
by $18,500.
(57 -c) Change Order No. 5.
This is a re gular Change Orde r adjusting the
final date of acceptance of the contract and
it allows time extensions due to changed con-
ditions and inclement weather .
No . 59 -Report on Scheduling of Remaining Master Plan
Sewers .
The staff wi l l report on the work remaining to be com -
pleted under the Dist rict's Master Plan and recommend a time
schedule to complete the work during the next several years .
No . 60 -Accepting Proposal of Boyle Enginee ring re :
Diversion FaciTi ies .
The District 's staff has reviewed possible revisions to
the sewer system in the norther·n portio.n of the District which
could defe r major construction by optimizing use of the Dis -
trict 1 s existing collection system. Currently, sewer flows
could be rerouted at four locations to reli eve overloaded
conditions in portion s of the District. It is r ecommended
t hat the proposal of Boyle ·Engineering to design the diversion
f acilities be accepted.
Fred A. Harper
· General Manager
-9 -
West Coast scene
California's
outfalls
Californi~ has 1000 miles of coast
stretching from the sun-drenched, sandy
beaches of the south to the timbered,
precipitous sca·cliITs of the north. The
co:lst is one of the state's greatest
resources, but its value is often under-
mined by conflicts in its multiple use.;.
The problem is particularly acute in
southern California where more than
half of the slate's 20 million persons
reside. The coast and its ·adjacent waters
arc used for myriad forms of recreation,
ho11sing and other construction, offshore
oil exploitation, commercial and sriort
fishing, sewage disposal, and military
installations. In 19G9, in an unpr12cc-
dcnte<l mov.e, five local agencies com-
bined their resources to sponsor a study
into one of the most sensitive issue~ of
the area-water quality and coastal
marine ecology. The first phase of the
study, which lasted three years, pre-
sented some data and evaluations that
should cause sohf'r reflP.ction on the p3rt
of environmentalists and others con-
cerned ,...,ith water quality.
The study known as the Southt'rn
California Coastal Water Research Pro-.
jcct (SCCWRP; rhymes with slurp) re-
cl?ived support from the major county
(shire) sanitation districts .:md from the
two major cities, Los Angeles nnd San
Diego, in the region. The local agencies
set up a SCC\\'RP commission and a
scientific cons11lti·:1g board that oversJw
the rese>Jl'Ch and coordin;ltcd the study.
Th<~ sdcntific contin~cnt includf'd marine
biologists, chemists, geologists Jnd
physicists who conducted the nrcessary
research and called upon numerous col-
leagues when the occasio;i aros<:. Pro-
fessor John D: Isaacs (Scripps Ir.stitution
of Oceanography) chaired the co!lsulting
board. They were charged wi:h explor-
ing the physical, chemical ar.d hiolo!!iral
processes and phenomena in th<' w.ltrrs
off the coast known as thf' ~outhcrn
-ornia Ili6ht ;rnd to re-Litt' th<'~C'
ll!lfflng:; to water quality man;1gemrnt
~ystcrns and to specify furthN re~carch
requirements.
Wh~1t is pC'rh:-ip~ the mo~t int rip1in~
result of thr thn'C'·yc.1r s~udy SC'e111s to
lh~ 1·.1t hC'r self·l'Vid,,nt. T11t~ ~1;111.\;ird~ of
wal<•r qu;ility <ll'l' primarily Sl'! for in-
land fr<'shw;1trr hodil'"· The SCC\\"HP
findings c-mph<isiS(' and 1·rcmphasisc the
facl that "the waters of the sea-par-
:;,uJ.it Iv those of a deep, diverse, and
:Jthcr ·strongly circul.1ting region like
:!le Southern California JJight-possess
i n'o,;Jicnc:; of quite a ciitforent order
1 ::i.rn the frc::-hw..itcrs of the continent.
ihc .:)Cd h.1s alw.iy.; been a sink for the
:t>~1ching of the land, and the resultant
:Nwatt'r is a solution so inimical to
:errestrial and ·freshwater microscopic
.ind m:icroscopic life that few forms can
~ ~ff ccl a transition." Furthermore they
SJ\' tha~ cnvi:onmcntal prac~iccs de-
·,·c·JQpCd far freshwater environments
:i:lve Ji:tle direct applicability to marine
I . ~ituations. .
· • Thr creatures of the sea come in a
I
I'. \\idc variety of forms and functions
J!lowinr. them to tolerate greater en-
'. \·iro11mcntal extremes than. are possibl?
1 '.:or frcslnvater and terrestrial commum-
1 '. :ies. For example. the SCCWRP pcrson-
i nel started monitoring the Orange
licounty sc\vagc outfall 1·5 years bciorc I j the authorities switched from an outfall
I 1 :crminating one mile off shore to one
11 :erminating five miles o~shore. They
: . fuund that the fauna rapidly recovers
I, I from cnvir?nm?ntal ~tress w:1cn sc\vage .~ disch.:irge is discontinued. F urthcrmorc
!I tl!ev reoortcd that the concentration of n trd~(: ~etals in the sediments rapicly
11 d~crca~ed du~ to (:xch;in~c anrJ mixini;!
i• with 1.he w:J!er c0lumn. Thus tl:<'y claim !!~ ~hat most d1angc~ J.rc reversible.
~ T}ie ~ewa~'! discharge :-rem<> to affect
a relativelv small area. \Vithin that area t! the fauna. art~ partic.u brly robust. The
U density of creatures is greatest near
~' the ot;tf alls, <JS r.1ight be expected .. Most
' of t)1e sewag~ contains nutrients that
encourage growth. "Natural" nutrients
~ usu1tllv sint.: to the bottom of the sea
J and ;re only avai!ahlc when the cur-
1 rent$ wen r-l1ern up from their depths.
~ !n the confirwd dom"in of a lake, these ~ additional nutrients ,,..,·oul<l encourage n enough a]g'JC growth to choke off the ~ Jakc"s vi<?bility. Th·~ total flow of waste-~ w:i~cr into Sol.lthcrn California wat{'rS
is 2fJOO tir.ics le~<; than ~he flow of the
CJ<e;.11 currc·1~s that o.;v•ccp tl1rough the
Bi~ht frorn th<.: :"\orth Pacific Ocean.
JnGcp~n<l~Pt ol the <:nvironmcHtal stress
du~ to the discharge. the marine cmn-
rnunitv in Southern C;ilifornia is sub-
jecrcd~ co:1tinuously •o natura1 changes
in atmospheric and oceanographic con-
ditions.
Alt hou ~h the SCC\<\'l\P report com-
r.1 c11·~ c; t~c :;~1nitat.ion district<> for their
cor~petcnt prnctic1~s. there arc several
di~turbing findings. A few species of
bottom-dwelling fish <'xperience fin-
eroc;ion dis,:;cse in rather high propor-
tions. The investir,ators were not' able
to corrclat1~ I his disease with <my of
the substances llley 111onitored. These
include DDT, l'CB~ ;111J I race metals.
The group strongly reco111111cmlcd strict
('CJntrols or dtlori11atrd hydrocarbons,
such ;:!<; l>UT a11d PCB, due to their '
poh'nt ial h.izard.
New Scientist 12 July 1973
h cores of 1rn<listurt>c<l SC'dirnents taken
l! f nmt the S<Jnta Barbara basin showeu an
1
1, . a•.toundin~ incr<'a.;c of lca1l and mercu'!'
in the marine cnviro1111u~nt. l\l~rctffy m
1 i the sediments has doubled s111ce t~e
. ,· turn of t ltf~ century :ind l~Jd has in-
, c.reas<~d by a factor o_f 10 1.n the p;1~t
few· de...:ac.ks. OcC'~tn i:11culat1on models
indicate that these hvo metals rntcr the
ocean from the nl.mosphen~. Thus the
mercury levels are proh;1hly due tr>
worldwide human activities rather thau
to local sources. The lead is attributed
·to leaded petrol u~ed in automobiles. ·
The report recommended stricter con-
trols on floatablc material such as oil
and pbstics. :'\ot only arc Lhrsc materials
aesthcticaly unpleasing but they can
'Carry harmful microorg;1nisms, such ns
sewage bacteria, to the ~urfacc where
they can disperse to bPaches and shell-
fish beds. The tloaiaulcs dcfc;it the wl:olc
purpose of hav!ng a subme>rged outfall.
One curious -and as yet uncxp laincd
result cmer~r.d from the study. Dotlom
dwelling fish near the outfalls havr: less
trace clements in their flesh than more
disl.Jnt fish. In some cases the levels
arc lower than for fish living in areas
remote from man. It is possibic :hat
the abundancP-of nutrients c3use the
fish to grow rapidly and that the trJcc
metals arc diluted by the n~w tissue.
When it is explained this result m...1y be
'One of the most significant findings of
the study. ·
Gerald Wick
-· .
r II
BOARDS OF DIRECTO RS
County Sani ta tion Distr icts
of Orange Co unt y, Ca liforn ia
JOI N T BOARDS
MEETING DATE
SEPTE MB ER 12, 1973 -7:30 P.M.
(1) Pled ge of Allegi ance and Invo c ation
(2) Ro ll Ca ll
(3) Appoint men t of Chairmen pro t e rn, if ne cess ary
FILE ..•.•••••••.•••••••
LEmR ·······-···t l.j)
we .... TKlR ·-· DI S TRICT 7 •
Election of Chai r man ~ ..... ~:_.j:JN
(5) EA CH DISTR I CT
Post Offic e Box 8127
10844 Ell is Ave nue
Fou n tain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones: ·
Are a Code 71 4
540-29 10
962-241 l
AGENDA
AD JO URN MENTS •..• ::::: ... "-
COMP & MILEAGE ••• t.c.::-
FILES SET UP ....... ~ ..... ..
RE SO LUTIONS CERTIFIEDV
LElTER S WRI TTEN ............. .
MINUTES WRITIEN ............ .
MINUTES FILED ........•.••••• m
Con s i d e rat ion o f mo tions approvin g ~inu t es of the
f o ll ow i ng meet ings , as ma i l ed :
ML> District 1 Au g u st 8 ,. 1 9 73 r egular
Ml > Dist r i c t 2 Au g u s t s · ' 1_9 7 3 r egular
N\\..> Di s trict 3 August 8 , 1 9 7 3 re g ul ar
M.\ ~ Di s t rict 5 Au gus t 8, 1 9 73 r egul ar
M\~ Di s tric t 6 Au gust 8 , 1 9 73 r egular
h\ \s Di s t r i c t 7 Au g u st 8 , ·1 9 73 r egu l ar
fi\ is EYJ::s tri c t 11 Au g u st 8 , 1 9 73 r egul a r
@ ALL DI S 'r RT CTS
Re port of t h e J o int Ch ai r ma.n
(i§J ALL DI STRICTS
Re p o rt of the Ge nera l Ma n ager
,
@ r
ALL DI STRI CTS
Re port o f t he Ge ne r a l Co u n se l
I
(9) ALL DISTRICTS
CONSEN'r CALENDAR
All matters placed upon the consent calendar
are considered as not requiring discussion or
further explanation and unless any particular
item is requested to be removed from the consent
calendar by a Director, staff member, or member
of the public in attendance, there will be no
separate discussion of these items. All items
on the consent calendar will be enacted by· one
action approving all motions, and casting a
unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the
consent calendar. All items removed from the
consent calendar shall be considered separately
in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an
item from the consent calendar shall, upon
recognition by the chair, state their name,·
address and designate by letter the item to
be removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be
deleted from the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda
items appearing on the consent calendar not
specifically removed from same.
(a)
FlLE __ .......
. LETT!ll -·-·····
A/C _'Ml ....
(b)
FILE ................. .
Ir) <t I
L!TT!R ~-···~ ..
A/C .... TKLR ••••
··-
F :LE ···-·--J . .2.)
LEnER ........... -
A/C _00.R ....
~. 0)
(d)
FILE ............... _
LE1TER ... -....•.•••
NC-MR ....
O.o.
Consideration of motion authorizing the
General Manager to designate one staff member
to attend the Water Pollution Control
Federation Conference in Cleveland, Ohio,
September 30 -October 5, 1973; and
authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals,
lodging, and incidental expenses incurred
Consideration of motion authorizing pajment
to Southern California Edison Company for
engineering design in connection with installation
of 66kv to a 12kv substation to serve
46 MGD Activated Sluage Plant at Reclamation
Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-16, in an amount
not to exceed $3,500.00
Consideration of motion to receive and file
bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding
Printing of General Provisions and Standard
Specifications, Specification No. P-002, to
R. H. Landin Graphics in tne amount of
$5,255.48. See page "A"
Consideration of motion to receive and file
bid tabulation and recommenQation and awarding
purchase of Bar Screen Chain, Specification
No. E-069, to Power Products c·ompany (agent
for Moline Corp.) in the amount of $7,460.00
See page "B"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 3)
-2-
'·
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
fl ~·······_(~)
LETTE;J .. t/
Consideration of Resolution No . 73-130,
to receive and file bid tabulation, rejecting
all bids to Rebuild No. 1 Engine at Plant No. 1,
Specificat ion No. PW-031 , and directing that A/C -TKLR ....
I
FllE ---.LO .. .
l.ETI!R ---.... .
A/C -TICllt -·
_Qfw. . .,/
said work be accomplished by utilization of
Districts' forces, pursuant to legal opinion of
the General Counsel. See pages 11 C" and "D"
Consideration of motion authorizing the General
Manager to advertise and award purchase to the
lowest .responsible bidder for Three (3) Replacement
Expansion Joints a t Plant No . 1 Headworks,
Specification No. E-070, in an amount not to
exceed $3 ,300.00 plus tax and freight
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to convene in executive session to
consider matters re litigation on Ocean Outfall No. 2,
Job No . J-10 ~·-o '-(
(1 2) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to reconvene in regular sessio.n t ~-t-i.f
,N\\S ( i3) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
request a proposal from John Ca rollo Engineers for preparation
of a project r eport for 75 MGD advanced treat ment expansion
\FILE ...J../ --LETTER '~S\...
A!C::.ma -at Plant No. 2, as requi~ed by the State Water Respurces
Control Board i n connection with grant approval fo~ 1973-74
fiscal year projects, to be submitt~d to the Executive
Committee for study and recommendation to the Joint Boards .
See page "E "
(1 4)
t\f\~~
ALL DISTRICTS
Consid eration of motion to receive and file the f6llowing
letters received in response to communication of the Joint
Chairma n regarding the Districts ' position on proposed
legislation to gi ve cities discretion re underground utility
FILE -·-M .. .;.·-·rights of way:
LmlR ··-···-
A/C _TIClR -· Senator Dennis E. Carpenter
Assemblyman Kenneth Cory
City of Irvine
City of Yorba Linda
Letter Dated:
August 18, 1973
August 10, 1973
August 8, 1973
August 8, 19'(3
See pages "F" , "arr , "H" , and _"_I_" __
~\~~~5~LL DISTRICTS ~·-Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from
LETTER -orange County Water Management Agency, dated July 22, 1973,
AIC -TKLR ~nd refer to Exe cu t i ve Committee for study and re c:ommen dation. ~~See page 11 Jr1
~1·--ALL DIS 'rRICTS . · Fl~-Repo r t-and r ecomme ndation of Special Cammi ttee on Feasibility
( LrnE),.l::::::.. of Electronic Data Proc essing System, and consideration of
)J~.TKLR _ action on Committee's recommendation
-3-
• .
. ( 17)
JI\\~
(20)
ALL DISTRICTS
Con sideration of motion to receive and fil e staff progress
report on Treatment Plant Construction Projects. See
page "K"
ALL DISTRICTS
Considerat ion of motion to rece ive and file certification
of the General Manager that he has checked all bills
appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and
that he recommends authorization for payment
ALL DISTRICTS
Con sideration .of roll call vote motion approving Joint
Oper at ing and Capital Outlay Revolving warrant books for
si gnat ure of the Chairma n of District No. 1, and authorizing
payment of claims listed on supplemental agenda attachment
L ISTRICTS b:i.sine.ss~ cornrnunicati~ or supp~~tal agenda
m , if any ·
M \.> (21 ) DISTRICTS 1 & 7
m~oN Consid e rat ion of motion approving suspense fund warrants,
~UPPtEMEN TAL AGENDA if any. See supplemental agenda attachment
( 2 2) DI STR;[.G.!;P--l.-
--€-~e-i!-me-t-i-.efl-a'f>t)-P-ev-i-B-g-wa-~P..a:r-i4Ys-,-i~f-arci'Y-.
S-e~]?±em-e-B-t-a..J:,.-a-ge-BB...a-a-t-t-ae-ft.m.@-H-t
(23) ~-RICT 1 · ~e r b~_sines~d communic a tions ~ supplement~agenda
it ems , if any
(24)
(2 5 )
DISTRIC1I' 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn i ~~q
DIS'rRICTS 2 ·& 3
Consideration ~f items regarding Standard Agreements with
cities for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges :
(a) Con sideration of t he following resolutions approving
and authorizing execution of Standard Agreements for
Collec tion of Sewer Co nnection Charges with cities : G ::;::;:::: See page "L"
A/C ~.TKLR --City
---"--
An aheim
----Orange
Villa Park
District 2
No. 7 3-1L12-2
No. 7 3-131-2
No . 73-132-2
Di strict 3
No . 73-14 3 -3
( b)
FILE --··-··--·· (@R~ .. L:
C onside~ation of the following resolutions approving
Supp l em e nt to Standard Agreements for Collection of
Sewer Connection Charges with cities, incorporating
"hold harmless" provisions as recomme nded by the
A/C -TKLR -·
Genera1 Counsel, See page 11 M1 1
Distric t 2
Anaheim No . 73-144-2
Or a n ge No . 7 3-1 33-2
Dis trict 3.
No. 73-14 5-3
Villa Park No. 7 3-l 3 Ll-2 Q Status Re port r e . Standard Agreeme nt s for Collection
FILE·····-·········-· of Sew e r Conne ct i on Ch a r ges with cities . See
~p age "N11
·
A/C _.TKLR .... C'\ • •
-.f'<. :f.,..._ c. ,uJ;;tlt. ·~
itr::!?~s ~~. ~~1,
....:4_
. '
(26)
. \0 N\ '
DIST RICT 3
Resolut ions aut h ori zing ini t iation of proceedings to annex
app roximately 155 acr es of territory to the District in
the vi cin ity of the U. S . Naval Ammunition Depot at Bolsa
Chic a Road and Wes tmi nster Av e nue , as follows:
(a) Consideration of Standar d Reso lution No . 7 3-135-3
FILE --~-......... authorizing ini tat ion of proc ee dings to annex
a.mE "V a.pproximat e ly 10 3 . 8 a cres of territory to the
···-··-····· Dist rj:ct in t h e vici n ity of the U. S . Naval
>Jc -TICLR ·-Ammunition De pot at Bo l sa Chica Road and Westminster
~~~-Avenue (Proposed Annexat i on No . 3D -Uninhabited -
~~~~Bo l sa Chic a Road Annexat i on to Coun ty Sanitation
District No. 3)
(b) Con s ideration of Reso lution No . 7 3-1 36-3
F1Lf ··---·--authorizing init i ation of prorieedings to anne x
approximately 53 .6 acres of territory to t h e
Dis tric t in the vicinity of the U. S . Naval
Am mun i tion Depot at Bolsa Chica Road and Westminster
--...._l t\ c.,
~R.J ········-·-
A/C _ma ... ,
(27)
Avenue (Proposed Annexation No . 3E -Inhabited -
Bolsa Chica Road Annexation to County Sanitation
District No. 3) See page 11 0 11
DISTRICT 3
Conside rat i on of motion to ·receiv e a nd file staff p r ogress
r eports on construction of the Knott Interceptor , Contrac t
No . 3-17; the Bolsa Reli e f Trunk Sewer and Bolsa Ave n u e
Storm Drain, Contract No . 3-17-1; and t he Knott Interceptor ,
Reach 4, Contract No . 3-18 . See pages "P", "Q " ,,and
11 R 11
~\\S (2 8 ) DISTRICTS 3 & 11
ITEM S oN Con sideration of motion approving s usp e n se fund wa rrants ,
su PP tEM EN T~L AG ENDA if any . See supplemental agenda i tern at tachrne n t
DI STRICT 3
Consideration of motion approving warrant s, if any .
agenda ite m attachment suPmJJ;~;A~~GEMDA See supplemental
\f.!te )~--~·-···( 30 ) DISTRICT 3
~ ·-·---····· Other bus iness and corrununications or supp l emental agenda
Al'SJID>~~fe~t~~~GENDA items, if any -~-P \ ..... ~-~ • " -...u 1 ~U.. ~ i\e.sc . r'/3>-lc./7-3
---~~~~ ~~~. Re..)> ... .-?3 -1'4 &-3 _..-_._(31) DIST RICT 3 ~-
Con s i d e ration of motion to adj o ur '? ·. 5 3
(32) DISTRICT 5
(a )
FILE ···-·············
LETTER ····-······-
A/C -TXLR -·
(b)
FILE ·--·--·
LETTER ----
A/C -TICLR -
Consideration of ~otion approving Change Order No . 5 ,
to the plans and speci fic ations for Sewer Trunk 11 B 11
-
Unit 8 -Pac i fic Coast Hi ghway Force Main, Contract
No. 5-19, author iz ing an addition of $47,7 51 .00 to
th e contract with A. G. Tutdr Co., Inc . & N. M. Saliba
Co ., a Joint Venture. See page 11 S 11
Co n siderati on of motion approvin~ Chan ge Ord e r No . 6,
to the plans and s pecifications for Sewer Trw1k 11 B11
-
Unit 8 -Pacific Coas t Hi g hw a y Force Main , Co n tra ct
No . 5-1 9 , g r a nt i ng an ext e nsion of time of 4 2 cale ndar
days to the contract with .A. G. Tutor Co ., Inc . &
N. M. Saliba Co., a Joint Ve nture . See pa g e 11 T 11
-5-
. .
(33) DISTRICT 5
FILE-=.;·~;-····· Consideration of Reso lut ion ·No . 73 -1 37-5 accepting
~ER ----·-·-··-Sewer Trunk 11 B" -Unit 8 -Pacific Coast Highway Force
A/C --·TKLR -Main, Contract No . 5-19, as complete ; authorizing .i.==-~&....;._e x ecu t ion of a Notice of Compl etion; and approving
~ · Final Closeout Agreement . See page "U"
/\'\\> (34) DISTRICTS 5 & 6
·· ITWS ON C . d t . f t . . f d t SUPPLEME NTAL AGEN M onsi era ion o mo ion approving suspense un warran s ,
if any . See supplemental agenda atta.chment
f'vil > ( 35 ) DISTRICT 5 .
ITEMS o N Consideration of motion approving warrants, i f any .
SUPP u:tAfNTAL AGENo~ee supp le mental agenda attachment
(36)
(37)
E-38)
(39)
( 40)
(ln)
(4 2)
(43)
DI RICT 5
Otn busin e ss an~ommunications or ~plementa l agenda
it ems , if any '
DISTRICT 5
Consideration of mot ion to ad j ourn g':.S...:S-
DI8TFHGT 6
·-Bon side rat.i o B o :f' mB-t74-~·f>"FB..:v::l..-R§-Wa~aH..t..s...,-i-f-a-~:y..
&ee-&l::l.fr]9-:kem e-1Te-a"3:-a-ge-a6: a at ta e hme B t-
DISTRICT 6 .
l)tfier bi:siness ~communic ations or ~lemental agenda
i t'e1ns , if a ny
DISTRICT 6
Con sideration of motion to adjourn ~:ss
DISTRICT B :
-Gens i de r at i Gn o f Hl&~!*'B.:v4.-i::rg-:wfrP-PaftB--s,--:L-f--a-rty .
· 8 e c sup }3'±effie-i'i-t-ad-a-g-enda at t ae-&me-fl-t.
DISTRICT 11
her busin e ss an~mmunicat i ons or~~plemental a ge nd a
it ms, if any
DISTRICT 1 1
.Conside ration of motion to adjourn
(44) DIS TRICT 2 PILI!~----Con s ideration of motion to receive and fi le Minute E xcerpt
LETTD -·-f rom the City of Anah eim , dated Au g u st 1 7, 1973 , approving
A/C -TKLR .... Di strict 's Envir o nmen ta l Imp a ct Statement re Santa Ana
____ River Inte rcept or Sewer, From Kate lla Avenue to La Palma
----·Av e nue , Con tract No. 2 -14-·2. S ee page "V"
( 45,.) DISTHICT 2
FILE t::> .•...• '.··-··-··-· Conside ration of mo tion to receive and fil e communic at ion
LETTER --··-···· and re s olution from the City of P l acentia , dat e d Au g us t 23, 1 97 3,
AIC __ mR ··-regarding appro v a l of route sele ctions for Di str ict 's Maste r Plan
_·--··---.S ewer F a cilities loc a t ed wi t hi n the City of Placent i a . Se e
p age "W" ----
(46) DI STRI CT 2 .
FILE • ...'1L Con s ide r ation of Resolution No . 7 3-138-2 a u tho r i zing
I
< i v -execution of agreement with Souther n Pac i f ic Trans p ortat }.on
1\1; J =-Co mp a ny f o r cross j_n g un der So u t h e rn Pacific r i ght o f way .
14/C-TKLR -south of Ba ll Road, j_n conn ection with constr uc tion of the
---Santa An a Rive r I n terceptor , From Kat ell a Av enu e to La Pa l ma
--·~··-·· Av enue , Con tract No . 2-14-2 . See p age "Xtt
-6-
~ DISTRICT 2 (~0< cSi. ~~ ~ ) k ~ ~-~ Consideration of Re~o lution No . 73 -139 -2 , authorizing •w:~·--· executi on of agreement wit h the City of Fountain Valley
\J!!!_ER ···-··-····· to accommodate construction of the Slater-Segerstrom
we __ .TKLR .... Bridge over the District 1 s S a nt a Ana River Interceptor , 'f .
----Contract No . 2-1 4-1, at a cost not to exceed $-3 , 000 to V,s-o-u
--~-the District, ·in form approved by the General Counsel; fV\,(S and rescinding Resolution No . 73-36-2 . See p age "Y"
·(48) DISTRICT 2
(a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 8 , l5 flLE N\ to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River
111 LETm -Interceptor from Rec l amation Plant No . 1 to Katell a
we __ TKLI -Avenue, Contract No . 2-14-1, authori zj_ng an add iti on
of $11 ,4 34.oo to the contract with Su lly-Miller
Contracting Company . See page "Z"
(b)
FI LE -----··-·-·
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 9 ,
to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River
Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No . 1 to Katella
Avenue , Contract No . 2-14 -1 , authorizing an addition
of $7 ,537 .50 to t he contract with Sully-Miller
Contracting Company . See page "AA "
LETTER --
A/C _na.R . --
(c)
FI LE.--
LETTER-
A/C _TKlR -
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 10 ,
to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River
Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No . 1 to Katella
Avenue , Contract No . 2-14 -1 , authorizing an addition
of $25 ,000 .00 to the contract with Sully -Miller
Contracting Company . See page 11 BB 11
MIC.. (4.9) DISTRICT 2
/'I / . ,_....-Considerat ion of Standard Resolution No . 73 -1 40 -2 ,
\_®-·--authori zing acceptance of Grant of Easement f rom San Di eg o
l!TTER 1--···-Pipeline Company for a permanent easement in connection
.A7e~h~R -with construction of th~ Santa Ana Ri v e r Interceptor from
'~ Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No . 2-14 -2 ,
.pa ~0 ,.c.• .. /t 'i.-v and authorizing payment in the amount of $3 ,SOO for said
easement
c5o) DISTRICT 2
fi~ Consideration of motion to receive and file let te r from
LmER-..---the City o f Orange, dated August 27 , 1973 , requesting that
AJc .... TKLR _ 'l1ract No . 8149 in District No . 2 b e served through .facilities
l ocated within Distri ct No . 7 , and refer to staff for study
and recommendation. See page "CC"
(51) DISTRICT 2
Con siderati on of motion to receive and file staff progress
report on construction of the Santa An~ River In terceptor
from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue , Contract
No . 2 -1 4-1 . See page "DD "
W°\\S (52) DISTRICT 2
' .-ITEM S oN Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any .
SUPl'tEMENTAL Ac-~e supplemental agenda attachment
(53 )
(54) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjo ur n
-7-
t1..t:\\S Fi&5.?._L .. ,!6STR~~T 7t · f t · t · d f · 1 Stop Notice 1n · onsi era ion o mo ion o receive an i e
LETTER ·········--· .. submitted by J. B . Crosby Co ., Inc. against Bomar Construction
we .... TKLR -company, Contractor for West Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 9 ,
----~20 & 22 , Cont ract No . 7-5-lR, in the amount of $1 ,500 .00
----··--(5 6 )
N\ > ,,L! ---l!TT!R _
Afc -YKLI -
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from the
City of Santa Ana , dated August 20, 1973, regardirig unpaid
obligations to the City of Bomar Construction Company ,
Contractor for West Relief Trunk Sewer , Reaches 19, 20 & 22 ,
Contract No. 7-5 -lR . See page "EE"
(57) DISTRICT 7
FILE ('a) C O d N 3 Consideration of motion approving hange r e r o . ,
lfTTl!R -----to the plans and specifications for the West Relief M.\S wc-m.a-Trunk Sewer, Reaches 19, 20 & 22, Contract No. 7 -5 -lR, l'' a ut horizing an addition of $2,463 .00 to the contract
with Bomar Construction Company . See page 11 FF 11
FILE ( 0)
LEmR--
A/C ___ TKLR -
flLE --(-cl
LETIER-
A/C _llWl -
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4,
to the plans and specifications for the West Re lief
Trunk Sewer , Reaches 19 , 20 & 22, Contract No . 7-5-lR ,
a u thorizing a deduction of $18 ,500 .00 to the contract
with Boma r Construction Company . See page "GG "
Consideration of motion app roving Change Order No . 5,
to th e plans and speci fic ations for the West Relief
Trunk Sewer, Reaches 19, 20 & 22, Contract No . 7-5-lR,
granting a time exte nsion of 144 calendar days to t he
contract with Bomar Construction Company . See page "Hi-I"
(5 8) DISTRICT 7 . Ml c_ FILE ···-·-······-· Consideration of Resolution No . 7 3 -1 41 -7, .accepting West
.J ~~ .. :~!. .. Relief Trunk Sewer, Reac hes 19, 20 & 22 , Contract No . 7-5-lR,
A{c TKLR as complete·, and authorizing execution of a Notice of Comp letion
j 'r;__;;. c~ .... upon receipt of l etters of permit compliance . from the Ci t:i.e s
·1'.'(¥ c-i, ,,.~ of Santa Ana and rrustin ; and approving Final Clos e out Agreement . c::;C t' See page 11 II 11
C:2~ DISTRICT 7 we~.,.<: Verbal staff report on scheduling of remaining Master Plan
£,_c,\.J v,)L, facilities . See page "JJ"
~~~~TRICT 7 ~-{\'g -~Consid e ra t ion of motion to receive, file and accept proposal
~ of Boyle Engineerin g Corporat i on , dated September 6 , 1973, ~~o r engineering services ·in connection with preparat ion of
A/C-TKLR-plans and specifications for Diversion _ Facilities , Contracts
Nos. 7-3A-l, 7-3A -2, 7-3B-l, and 7 -3E-l , for a l ump sum f e e
of $2 ,645 .00. Se e page "KK"
}\\\S, (61) DISTRICT 7
ITE MS ON ~ • d t · f t • . t ' f SUPPL EMENTAL AGENo onsi era ion o mo -ion approving warran s, i · any .
ee supplemental age nda attachment
(62) DIS . ICT 7
?the b:isiness an~unicatio~ supplement~ agenda
it ems , if any . . ·
(63) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to ad journ q : D~
-8 -.
MAN AGER 'S AGENDA REPORT
Cou nty Sanitation Dis tri~ts
Pos t Office Box 8 1 2 7
10844 Ell is Avenue
Foun t ain Vo ll ey, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
of Orang e County, California
REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday , September 12, 197 3
7 :30 p.m .
Area Code 7 l 4
540-29 10
962-241 1
The following is a brief explanation of the more
importa nt non -routine it e ms which appear on the enclosed
agenda and which are not otherwise self -explanatory. Wa rrant
li sts are not attached to the agenda since they are made up
i mmediately preceding the meetin g but will appear in the
supplemental agenda available at the meeting . The Execut ive
Cormni ttee did not meet du r ing the month of August .
District No . 7 .
No. 4 -Election of Cha i rman .
Chairman Clift·c:m Miller h as accepted a prominent position
with the University of Houston, Texas, e.nd has subm itted his
resignation to the Tustin City Council e ffective August 31st .
Therefore , it wi ll be necessary for t~e Board to elect a new
Chairman .
Joint Boards
No . 9 Consent Calendar .
. The following age nda items fall into this category in
accordance with the definition .es tablished by the Boards :
(a) Attendance at National Meeting of Water
Pollution Control Federation in Cleveland .
It is reconnnend ed that the General Manager
be authorized to send one staff member to
the annual meeting of this organization
which repre sents all aspects of the waste
treatment and water pollution control fie l ds
in this country and several fore i gn coun tries .
We have been active in this organization and
their conf e rences and exhib its have proved
to be extremely valuab le to the Dist ricts.
(b ). Authorizing Payment to Southern California
Edison Company for Engineering Design .
The design engineers for the 46 mgd activated
sludge plant have been in contact with the
Edison Company concerning the power ~equire
ments necessary to operate the p lanned secondary
treatment facility at Plant No. 1. They have
been advis e d by the Edison Company that to
meet the construction schedule of th~ Districts,
it will be necessary for the company to begin
engineering design in connection with t h e instal-
lation of a 66 KV to a 12 KV substation on the Dist ricts '
property immediately . The company requires that the
District s agree to cover their e ngineering costs up to
a maximum of $3 ,500 in the event th.e pro ject is sub -
sequently abandoned .
( c) and ( d) Awarding Purchase Orders fo r Advertised
Wor k and Ma t e rials, Specif ication Nos .
P -002 and E-069 .
(e)
(f)
It is rec o mm e nd e d that Purchas e Orders for r equi r ed
mat erials described in the agenda for Spec ification
Nos . P ~002 ~nd E -069 be award ed to the named lowest
responsible bidders .
Re build No . 1 Engine ~t P lant No . 1, Specification
No. PW-031 .
On September 5th, the Districts opened compe titiv e
bids to rebuild this e n g ine . The b ids were con -
s iderably higher t han the staff esti mates the work
can be accomplished for . Attac hed to the agenda
supporting ma t e rial i s the staff's memorandum
recommending tha t all bids be rej ec t ed and that
the work .b e p erfo rme d using District forces . This
appears to b e in the best i nt erest of the District s
b e caus e of a possible saving of over $6 ,ooo .
Authorizing the Gene r al Manager to Advertise for
Ac q uisi t ion of Three Replacement Expansion J oints .
It is r e commend ed that th e ac tion appearing on the
consent cale nd ar (f) be authorized to acquire three
r e placement piping expan sion joints for t he P l a n t
No . 1 Headworks , in an amount not to e xc eed $3 ,300
plus tax and freight . ~
·-2 -
No. 11 -Report on Litigation, Job No . J-1 0 .
On Februar y 14, 1973, the Boards authori zed emp l oyment
of Garvin F . Shallenberger, of Rutan and Tucker, to represent
the Districts concerning litigation resul ting from the con -
struction of Ocean Outfall No . 2 by Peter Kiewit Sons ' Company .
Mr . Shall enberger will report on the case developments to
date and answer questions from t he Boa r d members .
No . 1 3 -Requesting Proposal fo~ Project Report for
75 mgd Advanced Treatment .
The Districts have just received not i fication from the
State Water Resources Control Board to proceed with the prepara-
t ion of a Pr oject Report for the fiscal year 1973-74 Clean Water
Construction Grants . Our agency has a project to expand Pl ant
No . 2 faci l ities, including provisions for 75 mgd advanced
waste treatment. Before any proposed construction of treatment
facilities can be considered for State and Federal grant ·
assistance , a detailed Project Report must be filed with the
State . This report does not involve the design of the project,
·but r ather the evaluation of various t r eatment methods and a
se l ection of the processes to b.e utilized . The letter, which
is enclosed in the agenda material specifies that if this
project is to remain on the 1973-74 priority list and receive
cons~deration for funding, the Project -Report.with a l l support -
ing documents must be submitted by. March 1, 1 974 . Since much of
the information which is required for the Project Report is being
compiled by the Districts' ·treatment p l ant engineers in a Master
Pl an Report, it is the staff's recommendation that a proposal be
·solicited from them to prepare the Project Report for review and
recommendation by the Executive Committee at the October Joint
Board meeting .
No . 15 -Communication from Orange County Water Manage -
ment Agency.
We have r eceived a commun i cation f r om the Orange County
Water Management Agency suggestin·g that the Sanitation
Districts consider possible membership in the agency . It
is recommended that the .matter be referred to the Executive
Committee for study and recommendation .
No . 16 -Report of Special Committee on Feasibility of
Electron ic Data Processing .
The Committee will report its recommendation on the
se l ection of a qualified firm to conduct a study of the needs
of the Districts concerning the establishment of an electronic
data processing system. As reported earlier, the Comnittee
has met on several occasions and is cur r ently reviewi :~g pro -
posal s from six firms . Chairman Stevens will present the
Committee 's recommendation to the· Joint Boards on September
12th.
-3 -
Districts Nos . 2 and 3
No. 25 -Approving Standard Agreements for Collection
of Sewer Connection Charges, and Staff Progress
Report .
Included with the agenda material is a progress report
concerning the number of cities which have approved standard
agreeme nts for collection of the newly -adopted District sewer
connection charges . The staff desires direction from the
Boards as· to what alternative steps can be taken in the event
any of the remaining unsigned cities choose not to enter into
the agreements providing for the collection of the Districts '
connection charges .
District No. 3
No . 26 -Resolut.i.ons Authorizing Annexation Proceedings
to Annex Approximately 155 Acres to the District .
On August 9, 1 972, the Board approved, in principle, the
a n nexation of this territory to the District and established
. an annexation fee of $97 ,561 .17 . The two resolutions appear-
ing in the agenda authorize t he initiation of annexation
proc eedings for the proper~y . It i s the staff 's recommenda-
tion that the resolution s be approved .
District No. 5
N6s . 32 and 33 -Closeout of Co ntract No . 5 -19 .
These agenda items wil l c l ose out Contract No . 5 -19,
S e we r Trunk 11 B11 -Unit 8, Pac ific Coast Highway Force Main .
(32 -a) Change Order No . 5 .
Five items cons titute Change Order No . 5 in
the amount of $47 ,751 . The major item, $23,741,
is for premium time r e quir ed by the Contractor
to perform the work du r ing the evening hours which
was not originally specified in the Enc roachment
Fe rmi t issued by the Di v ision of Highways . · This
change was required by the City of Newport Beach
and the Division of Highways to better accommodate
the traffic on the Pacific Coast Highway . Also
required was additional structural asphaltic
concre t e paving, because the Divi s ion of Highways
was unable to schedule the ir channelization con -
tract to proceed immediately after the completion
of the District 's Force Main facility as planned .
-4 -
Added costs of approximately $15,000 resulted
from uti lity interferences whic h were not
delineated on the contract plans . Ut i-li ty records
were not definitive at the time of the preparation
of the plans. A 12 11 high-pressure gas main inter-
fered with portions of the gravity sewer on the
south side of the 11 Arches 11 and had to be .relocated
requiring the installation of additional manholes
to avoid conflicts . In addition , the valve vault
at the Rocky Point · Pump Station had to be relocate d
and modified to avoid utility conflic ts_.
$7 ,478 was for additional wor k to remove concrete
debris l ocated near the abutmen t of t he 11 Arches 11
ove r crossing . This debris was the foundation and
remains of an old abandoned glass f actory.
An extra jacking pit was required for the instal-
l ation of the reinforc ed plastic mortar lining
in the existing VCP grayity sewer in the Coast
Highway. Thi s additional pit was required
because there was a change in grade in the
existing gravity sewer, adding $1 ,423 to the
contract.
(3 2 -b) Change Order No . 6 ..
This is a regular Change Order adjust"ing the
final date of acceptance of .the cont ract and
it allows time extensions due to changed con -
ditions and inclement weather .
I t is r ecommended that Change Orders Nos . 5 ·and 6 be
approved, and that Resoluti on No . 73 -137 -5 accepting. the
contract as complete be adopted .
District No . 2
Nos . 4LJ. and 45 -Communications from Ci ty of Anaheim and
City of Placentia .
The communication from the City of Anaheim approves t he
District 's Environmenta l Impact Statement regarding the Santa
Ana River Interceptor from Kate lla to La Palma Avenues . The
communication from the City of Pl acentia approves the route
selections for District No . 2 Master Pl an sewer facilities
to be located within the City of Pla centia .
-5 -
No . 46 -Approving Agreement with Southern Pac ific
Transportation Company .
The res olution appear ing in the agenda authorizes
execution of an agreement with the Southern Pacific Transpor -
tation Company to acquire an easeme nt to cross Southern
Pacific 's right of way in conjunction with the installation
of a 63" sewer line on Contract No . 2 -14-2 . The easement is
being granted to the District at no cost .
No. 47 ·-Authorizing Execution of Agreement with the
City _of .F ountain Va lley re : Construction of Slat er-Segers trom
Brid ge .
Previously , the Board adopted Resolution No . 73 -36-2,
authorizing execution of an agreement with the City of Fountain
Va lley to accommodate construction of the Slater-Segerstrom
Bridge o ver the Di s trict '.s Santa Ana Rive r Interceptor , at no
cost to the District . Subsequently, it was determined that
significant changes would be requi r ed in the construction and
laying of the pipe to support the additional over-burden .
This additional work wi ll be done by the Contractor for a lump
·sum of $25,000 , which is refl ec ted in Change Order No . 1 0 . The
City of Fo untain Va lley has agreed to pay $22 ,000 of the total
Change Order if the District will obligate itself in the amount
of $3 ,000 .
It is r ecommended that execution of a.new agreement be
authori-zed, providing for a limited · financial p articipation
by the.District in an amount not to exceed $3 ,000 .
No . 48 -Change Orde·rs Nos . 8 , 9, a nd 1 0, Contract No .
2-14-1 .
(48 -a) Change Or der No . 8 .
I ncluded in this Change Order is t h e additional
cost of $18,684 for the removal and the relocation
of the City of Orange water main and a d ditional
support for the Metropolitan Water District water
main which were in conflict with the installation
of the interceptor sewer . The exact locations and
appurtenant supporting structures were not deter -
mined unti l exposed during construction . Also in-
c luded i s the removal and disposa l of debris,
which was discovered during the excavation , of
old dump sit e mat e rial. This material was un-
suitable for backfil l and interfered with
construction .
-6 -
Included in Change Order No . 8 is a deduction
in the amount of $7,250 which reflects the
savings because of contractural changes
benefiting the Contractor 's operation but not
affecting the final installation of the trunk
sewer . The Contractor was relieved of the
responsibility of tunneling under the Southern
Pacific Rai lroad crossing and the tunneling
underneath a reinforced concrete box ·storm drain
because of changes in requirements of the
affected agencies. The net Change Order adds
$11 ,434 to the contract.
(48 -b) Change Order No . 9 .
This Change Orde r is for the placement and
compaction of 1,005 cubi c yards of additional
stabilization base rock material. which is
specified as a stipulated price item in the
proposal. The placement of this material was
required becaus e of unstable material found in
the trench excavation. ·The Ch ange Order adds
$7 ,537 to the contract .
(48-c) Change Order No . 10 .
This Change Order adds $25,000 to the contract
for the n e cessary structural changes in the pipe
bedding to accommodate the proposed S1ater-
Segerstrom bridge crossin g of the Santa Ana
River as previously reported for Agenda Item
No . 47 .
No. 49 -Grant of Easement from San Diego Pipeline
Company-.
The action appearing on the agenda authorizes the
acc e ptanc e of a Grant of Easement from the San Diego Pip e lin e
Company for ri ght of way to construct a segment of Contract
No . 2 -14-2 at a cost of $3,500 . It is the s taff 's recommend a -
tion that the action be approved .
No. 50 -Request from the City of Orange to Serve Tract
No . 8149 through Facilities Locat ed wit hin District No . 7 .
The Public Works Department of the City of Oran ge has
request e d approval to serve a propos ed subdivision which lies
within District No. 2 through facilities which are in District
No . 7 . It is recommended that the District's staff meet with
-7 -
. -
personnel from the Orange Pub l ic Works Department to discuss
what sewer facilities can accommodate this deve l opment . Tract
No . 8149 is in a drainage area which i s tributary to the
District NQ . 2 Olive Subtrunk Sewer .
District No . 7
Nos . 55 and 56 -Communications re: Contract No . 7 -5-lR •
. We have received two communications regarding unpaid
obligations of the contractor for the Westside Re l ief Trunk,
Contract No . 7 -5-lR~ The actions appearing on the agenda
r eceive and file the communica tiqns ...
Nos. 57 and 58 -Closeout of Contract No. 7 -5 -lR.
These agenda items are necessary to close out Contract
No . 7-5-lR. The following is an explanation of the three
Change Orders . It is recommended that a Closeout Agreement
with the contra9tor be authorized with regard to Change Orders
Nos. 4 and 5:
(57-a) Change Order No . 3 .
This Change Order is a regular Change Order which
reflects the fina l quantities of work performed
by the Contractor and adjusts the fina l contract .
Change Order No . 3 adds $2 ,463 to the contract .
(57 -b) Change Order No . 4 .
Because of the difficul ty encountered by the
Contractor in achieving the necessary compaction
r equirements, it is the staff's recommendation
that the Contractor be relieved of any settlement
associated with the trench compaction and that a
sum of $12,500 be deducted from the final contract
p r ice . The material in which the sewer was being
placed was a saturated clay material and to achieve
a relative compaction of 90 percent became quite
difficult . The relative compaction of the un -
disturbed soil outside the trench area was less
than the requirements and it is felt that the
District, in assuming the Contractor 's liability,
will not sustain a cost greater than the deducted
amount . This recommendation is also to mitigate
the distur bance and inconvenience to those affected
by the construction in the Cities of Santa Ana and
Tustin . Also included in this Change Order is an
-8-
agreed assessed liqui dated damage in the
amount of $6,ooo . The net effect of Change
Order No . 4 is to r educe the contract price
by $18,500 .
(57 -c ) Change Order No . 5 .
This is a regular Change Order adjusting the
final date of acceptance of the contract and
it allows time extensions due to changed con-
ditions and inclement weather .
No . 59 -Report on Scheduling of Remaining Master Plan
Sewers .
The staff will report on the work r emaining to be com -
pleted under the District's Master Plan and recommend a time
schedule to complete the work during the next several years .
No . 60 -Accepting Proposal of Boyle Engineering re:
Diversion Faci i ies .
The District 's staff has reviewed possible revisions to
the sewer system in the norther·n portio.n of the District which
could defer major construction by optimizing use of the Dis -
trict 1 s existing collection system . currently, s e wer flows
could be rerouted at four locations to relieve overloaded
conditions in portions of the District . It is recommended
that the proposal of Boyle ·Engineering to design the diversion
facilities be accepted .
-9-
Fred A . Harper
General Manager
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
P. 0. BOX Bl 27, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID.OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
September 6, 1973
\
TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11
Gentlemen:
TELE PH ON ES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
Th~ next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange
County, California, will be held:. ·
WEDNESDAY EVENING, SEPTEMBER 12, ·1973
AT 7 : 30 p I M .•
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
Tentative adjournment prior to next regular meeting:
Executive Committee -5:30 p.m., September 25, 1973
West Coast scene
California's
outfalls
Californi.:l has 1000 miles of coast
stretching from the sun-drenched, sandy
beaches of the south to the timb~red,
precipitous sea-cliffs of the north. T.he
coast is one of the state's greatest
resources, but its value is often under·
mined by conflicts in its multiple uses.
The ·problem is particularly acute in
southern California where more than
half of the state's 20 million persons
reside. The coast and its adjacent waters
arc used for myriJd forms of recreation,
housing and other ronstr4ction, offshore
oil exploitation, commercial and srort
fishing, sewage disposal, and military
installations. Jn 1969, in an unprcce--
dcntc<l move, five local agencies com-
bined their resources to sponsor a study
into one of the most sensitive issue$ of
the area-water quality and coastal
marine ecology. The first phase of the
study, which lasted three years, pre·
sented some data and evaluations that
shrrnld cause sober reflection on the pJrt
of environmentalists and o~hers con·
cerned with \\tater quality.
The study known as the Southern
California Coastal Water Research Pro-
ject (SCC\VP.P; rhymes with slurp) re-
ccivl!d support from the major county
(shire) sanitation districts' and from the
two major cities,' Los Angeles and San
Diego, in the region. The local agencies
set up a SCCWRP commission and a
scientific consulting board that oversaw
the research and coordinated the study.
The .scientific contingent includrd marine
bi<Jlogists, chemists," geologists nnd
physicists who conducted the nrccssary
research and called upon numerous col·
leagues when the occasion arosi:-. Pro-
fessor John D. Isaacs (Scripps Ir.stitution
of Oceanography) chaired the consulting
board. They were char~cd with ex;->lor-
ing the physical, chemical and hiologiral
processes and phenomena in th{" \\'.ltcrs
,,ff the coast known as thf' ~0L1th<'rn
ifornia Bight and to rC'l:lll' th<'~C'
~din,:rs to watC'r qu~dity man;1f!t'mrnt
systems and to specify further rc~e;irch
rcqn ire men ts.
\Vh~1t is pcrh:ips th<' most int ri~uin~
result of thC' thn.'<'-yr,11' s~udy SC't'lll:-> to
lh~ rat hC'r' st•lf-C'vid••nt. The st;m,lllnl~ of
w;ilc-1• qu<tlity an~ primarily St.'! for in·
land frc·shw;1trr hndit''· The SCC\\'HP
findings emphasise and rccmphasisc the
fact that "the waters of the sea-par·
:nil.it ly those' of a deep, dinr.;e, and
:J!hcr strongly circul..1ting region like
::ie Southern C<!lifornia Bight-possess
i n..";:licnc:; of quite a ctitrcrent. order
1 :'.t.rn the frcshw..iters of the continent.
iiic :>CJ h.1S a!;-.-.1:;..; been 3 sink for the
:i.>JChing of the land, and the resultant
:e;1water is a solution so inimical to
:ern~strial and -frc~hwatcr microscopic
rnd niJcrosropic life that few forms can
~fleet a trans•tion." Furlh~rmore they
SJ\' tha~ environmental prac~ices de·
\·~·lope!d far frc:-hwaier environments
:i:iv~ Ji:tlc direct applicability to marine
I .5ituations. .
I, ; ThC' · creatures of the sea come m a
I'. 1\·idc variety of forms and functions
Jl!owinr. them to tolerate· .greater _cn-
l \'iro11ml'ntal extremes than are possible
! ~:or fr{'5h\vatcr and terrestrial communi-1. ~ie5. For example. the SCCWRP person·
1 ncl started monitoring the Orange
County sev·•Jgc outfall l · 5 years before I !he authorities S\1,·itched from an outfall
! :errninating one mile offshore to one
11 '.c&minating five miles offshore. They
~' fuuncl that the fauna rapidly recovers
'f I from environmental stress v:hen sewage
1i discharge is ciiscontinucd. Furthermore i' u~ev renorted that ~he concentration of ~ trac12 ~etals in the sediments rapidly H· t!1~crcJ~cd du<_• :o ~xch:ingc and mixing
'' ,,·ith ~he \\'3'.Pf i:olurnn. Thus tl:cy claim
111
l: !hat most c:h.-inges arc rc-.c:-silJlc.
l TPe 'ewag'! discharge seem<>. to affect
.t relativelv small are<1. \Vithin that area
Jl the fauna· are particularly robust. The
dcnsitv of creatures is greatest near
the ot;tfalls, as r.1ight be expected. !\fost
of t11c sewagP-contains nutrients that
encourage growth. "Natural" nutrients
usuallv sinl.: to lhi:! bottom of the sea
nnd ;re onlv available when the cur·
rents wc:J tl1em up from their depths. n !n the confim~d domRin Of a lake, these
~ additi<mal nutrients would encouras.;c
1,
1 enough algae gro\vth to choke off the
IJke's vi<:?bility. Th·~ total flow cf waslc-
w:ttcr into Southern C.-ilifornia watrrs
is 21JOO tir:1cs lc~c; than the flow of the
on'~•ll currc·1~s that s•vecp 111fou,!.!h the
Diet ht from th~ 0."ort h Pacific Ocean. In~cp'.!nd'?r.t ot tho. £;nvironmcutal s~ress
du~ to the discharge. the ma1·ine com-
rnunitv in Southern C;ilifornia is sub· jeered~ co:itinuously to natural changes
in atmospheric and oceanographic con-
ditions.
A !thou ~h the SCC\\'RP report com-
r;1Cll'~' t~c sanitation districts for their
cw!1pet~nt pr;irtices, there arc several
di~turbin:.; findings. A few srccies of
bottom-dwclli11g fish experience fin·
erosion disc~1sP. in rather high propor·
tions. The invcsti~ators were not· Jble
to correlate this disease with any of
the substances they 1nonitorl.'<l. These
indudc DDT, PCB:=; and trace metals.
The group stron!!IY rf'comrne11dcd strict
<'Ont.rob of clilori11at<'<I hydrocarbons,
such &!S Uiff and PCB, due to their
pcJtent ial h.izard.
New Scientist 12 July 1973
Lores of undisturoc<l S<'dirne11ts taken
frtJm the S;rnta Barb;ira ha-;in showed an
a'.tfJundin~ incrr.~1-;c of lf';icl anti mercury
in the marine cnviro11111l'nl. ~l~rcury. in
the sf!diincnts has <loublcd since t~c
. ,-turn of th1~ cl·11tury :ind l<?d has in-
c.rcasc·d hy a facto:· o.r 10 •.n the p;1~t
few· dc...:atlcs. Ocean •.">?Tulal1oa models
indicate that these two metals enter the
ocean from the nt.mosphcn~. Thu~ the
mercury levels are prob;1hly due to
worldwide human activities rather thai!
to local soun:es. The lead is attributed
to leaded petrol u;;cd in automobiles. ·
The report recommended stricter con·
truls on floatablc matcri,tl such as oil
and plastics. :\ot only arc these matcri<?ls
aesthcticaly unpleasing but. they can
carry .harmfu! microori~1nisms, such as
se,.,·agc bacteria, to 1 he ~urfacc where
they can <lispcrsc to beaches and shell-
fish beds. The tloalablcs defeat the wl:o1e
purpose of having a subrtH'r.~cd out :"all.
One curious rn1d as yet unexplained
rcsu lt emcr~~d fro111 the study. nottom
dwelling fish near the outfalls hJvc less
trace clements i11 their flesh than mnrc
dist<:mt fish. 1 n some cases the k'vt.:15
arc lower than for fish living in areas
remote from man. It is pos~iblc that
the abundanrn of nutrients <::iusc the
fish to gro\'<' rapidly and that the tr~ce
metals arc diluted by the ni:w tissue.
When it is explained this rrsu lt m..iy be
one of the most sir,nificant findings of
the study. ·
Gerald lVick
! I . iSOARDS Of DIRECTO RS
County Sanitation Districts Post Of!ice Box S 127
II
of Orange County, Californi.-J
ALL DISTRICTS
JOINT BOARDS
·SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS
SEPTEMBER 12, 1973 -7:30 P.M.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 71 4
540-29 l 0
962-2411
AGENDA
(19) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving
Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving warrant
books for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1,
and authorizing payment o.f claims listed on page "I"
DISTRICTS 1 & 7
(21) Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants.
See page "III"
DISTRICTS 3 & 11
(28) Consideration of motion approving suspense fund wa r rants.
See page "II"
DISTRICT 3
(29) Consideration of motion approving warrants.
See page "II"
(30) (a) Considera tion of Resolution No . 73-1 47-3, approving
and authorizing execution of St and ar d .Ag re eme nt fo r
Collection of Sewer Connection Ch a r ge s with the
City of Seal Beach. See page "L"
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 73-14 8-3, app r oving
Supplement to · standard Agre e me nt for Colle c t ion of
Sewer Connection Charg es wit h t he City of Seal Beach ,
incorporating "hold harmless" provisi ons as
recommende d by the General Co uns el. S ee pag e "M'1
(c) DISTRIC TS 2 & 3 -Consideration of mot ion to receive
.and fil e lett e r from Gard e n Gr o v e Sani t ary Di s trict ,
dated Se pt e mber 11, 1973, de claring their i ntent t o
enter into agreeme n t s with t he r e sp ect i ve Di stri c t s
to colJ.ec t connectio n fees wi t hin t he City of Ga rden
Grove . Se e page "IV"
(34) Conside ration of motion approving s u s p e n se f u n d wa r r ants.
See pag e "II"
DIS TRI Q'.I' 5
(35) Con s i de r a tion o f motion a p proving wa rrant s.
,, S ee p age __ "I~_" __
DI STRICT 2
(52) Co n s i de r a ti on of motion approving wa r r a n ts.
S e_e p age 11 ._I _I_" __
D IJ}~rR~_C'l~
(61 ) Cons i derat i on o f mo t ion a ppr oving war~ants~
SE!e page .. ___ _'.,2_II_" _____ _
W~ANT NO.
21038
21039
2104:>
21041
21:)42
21043
21044
21045
21046
21047
21048
21049
2105:>
21051
21052
21053
21054
21055
21056
21D57
21058
21059
2106()
21061
21J62
21063
21064
21065
21066
21067
21068
21069
21070
. 21071
21072
21073
21074
21239
21075
21076
21077
21078
21079
21080
21081
21882
21083
21084
~085
)86
21087
21088
21D89
2109()
21:>91
21-:)92
21:)93
21:>94
21:)95
21:>96
21Q9't
21:>98
21C>99
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
AAA Fremont Bag & Salvage, Sand Bags $
Alex Fish C6., Ecological Research Supplies
All Bearing Service, Inc., Compressor Parts
American Compressor, Compressor Parts
City of Anaheim, Power
The Anchor Packing Company, Pump Packing
Armstrong Environmental Industries, Hardware
Bank of America., Bond & Coupon Collection
Beckman Instruments, Inc., Electronic Parts
Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams
Business & Institutional Furniture Co., Shelving
Cals Cameras, Inc., Photo Supplies
Cal State Seal Company, Gaskets
California Auto Collision, Inc., Truck Repair
John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services
College Lumber Company, Inc., Building Materials
Commercial & C.B. Communications, Communications Equipment
Consolidated Electrical Distr., Electrical Supplies
Constructors Supply Company, Tools & Hardware
Control Specialists, Inc., Regulator & Parts
Costa Mesa County Water District, Water
County of Orange, Maps
Mr. Crane, Crane Rental
Crest Leasing Corp., Leased Vehicles
Cylcone Excelsweld Company, Engine Repair .
Daily Pilot, Employment Ad & Bid Notice P-002
Decker Instrument Supply Co.,. Controls
DeGuelle & Sons Glass Co., Glass
Nick DiBenedetto, Employee Mileage
Ducommun Metals & Supply Co., Steel
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies &.Equipment
Ecomatics, Pump Parts .
Electronic Business Machines, Office Supplies
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring (MO 12~14-66)
Engine & Compressor Supply Co., Parts
Ensign Products Company, Lube Oil
Enterprise Printing Co., Printing
Robert F. Finnell, Sec. Treatment Meeting (MO 6-13-73)
Fischer & Porter Company, Chlorinator Parts
Fisher Controls Company, Regulator Parts
Foss Company, Fo~m System .
France Products Division, Engine Parts
Fredson, Equipment Parts
Larry Fricker Company, Inc., Weed Killer
Gar Wood-Los Angeles Truck Equip., Inc., Seal$.
Garden Grove Lumber & Cement, Building Materials
General Telephone Company
Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine & Odor Control
Graybar Electric Company, Electric Supplies
Hardware Systems Co., Lab Supplies
Harlows Clocks, Time Repair
Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting & COD Expenses
Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc., Pipe Supplies
Hertz Car Leasing Division, Leased Vehicles
Hewlett Packard, Lab Supplies . ·
Honeywell, Inc., Metering Supplies & Strip Charts
Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies
City of Huntington Beach, Water
Huntington Beach Equipment Rentals, ~quipment Rental
Imperial First Aid Supply Co., First Aid Supplies
Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware ·
Int'l. Business Machines Corp., Office Supplies
Johnston Pump Company, Pump Repair (MQ 6-13-73)
I-1
AMOUNT
139.20
106.0J
235.68
762.67
15.0J
23.37
175.76
538.51
34.89
50.JJ
81.47
61.14
92.61
491.62
636.1:>
193.18
97.20
1,029.71
297. lC)
208.19
6.0J
44.34
1,448.4:)
147. 28
224.75
30.37
84.81
8.71
lOJ. IL~
171.47
294.50
48.97
31.8:)
2,400.JJ
6.25
244.81
17.81
77.0J
623.38
886.4:>
21.20
127.2J
8.99
lll.3C)
16.18
544.84
2,203.53
5,351.92
31.8Q
242.85
47.99
159.88
158. 5J
433.48
41.34
387.65
1,337.24
3l+.65
357. 75
16.)6
24.93
38.16
7,211.92
WARRANT NO.
~100
_101
21102
21103
21104
21105
21106
21107"
21108
21109
21110
21111
21112
21113
21114
21115
21116
21117
21118
21119
21120
21121
21122
21123
21124
21125
21126
21127
21128
21129
21130
21131
21132
21133
21134
21135
21136
21137
21138
21139
2114J
2111n
21142
21143
21144
21145
21146
21147
211lt8
21149
21150
~151
2.Ll52
21153
21154
21155
21156
21157
21158
21159
21160
21161
21162
21163
21164
·IN FAVOR OF
Kahl Scientific Instrument Corp., Ihstr.mentation ·$
Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supplies
King Bearing, Inc.~ Seals
Kleen Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies
Knox Industrial· Supplies, Hardware
Kontes,of California, Lab Supplies
Kressilk Products, Inc., Conveyor Parts
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Hardware & Tools
L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Service
The Lacal Company, Inc., Cleaner
Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Equipment Parts
Judy Lee, Employee Mileage
Lewis Bros. Battery, Batteries
R. W. McClellan & Sons, Paving Materials
John McCullough, Employee Mileage
Larry McLemore, Employee Mileage
Marine Biological Consul tan ts, Inc.·, Marine Ecology Study
Marshall Industries, Instruments
Metermaster, Inc., Metering Supplies
Morrison Company, Valves
Nakase Brothers, Gardening Supplies
National Chemsearch, Solvents & Cleaners
National Lumber & Supply Co., Building Materials
Nelson-Dunn Inc., Pump Parts
City of Newport Beach, Water
Newport Financial Corp., Hardware
C. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel Retainer
Noland Paper Company, Reproduction Paper
Oakite Products, Inc., Cleane~
The Ohmart Corp., Electrical Supplies.
Orange Coast Hardwood & Lumber, Hardware
Orange County Chemical Co., Chemicals
Orange County Radiotelephone, Page Unit Rental
Orange County Stamp Co., Qffice Supplies & Rubber Stamp
Oreo Electronics, Electro·nic Supplies
Pacific Telephone
Ron Parker, Employee Mileage
Norman I. Parsons, Employee Mileage
M. C. Patten Co., Pipe. Supplies
Pictorial Sciences, Inc., Aerial Photos
W. A. Plummer Mfg. Co., Operating Supplies
Porter Boiler Service, Inc., Boiler Parts
Postmaster, Postage
Douglas E. Prebl~, Employee Mil~age
Th~ Pryor Giggey Co., Freight
Pyramid Fence Company, Fenqing
Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal
The Register, Employment Ad
Richey ElectronicsJ Inc~, Telemetering Supplies
Robbins & Myers, Freight
Robertshaw Controls Company, Controls & Freight
Jack H. Ross, Employee Mileage
San Bar, Ecological Research Supplies
Santa Ana Blueprint Co., Printing
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motors & Motor :>arts
Santa Ana Electronics Company, Telemetering SupplieG
Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Lab Supplies
Scientific Products, Lab Suppli~s
S. F. Serrantino, Employee Mileage
The Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Supplies
A. H. Shipkey, Inc., Truclc Tires .
Singer Business Machines, Postage Meter Rental
Smith Optical Service, Safety Glasses
Snyder Manufacturing Co., Maintenance Supplies
So. Cal Forming, Inc., Pump ~epair
I-2
.AMOUNT
583 .85
1,532.67
47.70
179.44
115.60
. 4.45
1,230.84
914.21
1,709.68
22.64
200.70
26.34
129 .11
153.70
78.96
67.50
2,391.9:)
. 21.2()
36.54
10.34
55.81
473.29
86.49
313.41
366 .15
7.95
8:>:>.:>0
905.31
107.27
116.26
72.50
23.32
24.77
17.72
20.08
462 .67
8.25
4.95
128.09
95.40
13.27
11.97
50·:>. 00
54.18
29.20
767.63
40.00
22.34
s~ 6~ ../ . _,;
8.18
595. 63
113.52
57.22
30.11
258.16
24.55
156.52
58.82
33.30
405. L~2
39 .29
60.42
6l~. 89
3·y. 33
37 .10
WARRANT NO.
~165
-_166
21167
21168
21169
21170
21i71
21172
21173
21174
21175
21176
21177
21178
21179
21180
21181
21182
21183
21184
21185
21186
21187
21188
21189
2119:)
21191
21192
21193
21194
21195
21196
21197
21198
21199
21200
21201
21202
212:)3
21204
21205
21206
~07
~.L208
21209
IN FAVOR OF
Sou th Orange Supply,. Piping Supplies · $
Southern Calif. Coastal Water Research Project Authority,
73·74 Deposit per agreement
Southern Calif .. Edison
Southern Calif. Gas Co.
Southern Calif. Water Co.
Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water
Speed-E Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Stanco Mfg. Company, Equipment Parts
Standard Oil Company, Gasoline & Diesel Fuel
Stang Hydronics, Inc.,. Pump Parts
Sully Miller Contracting Company, Paving Materials
T & H Equipment.Company, Inc., Equipment Parts
Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage ·
Tell Steel, Inc., Steel
Tool & Hoist Division, Engine Parts
Triangle Steel & Supply, Steel
J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Blower
Harry L. Twining, Employee Mileage
Twining Laboratories, Concrete Test Supplies
Union Oil Co., Gasoline
United Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Utilities Supply Co., Tools
Van Waters & Rogers, Flocculation Study Supp. (M06-14-72)
John Waples R.S., Odor Consultant
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts
Western Fastener Company, Hardware & Pump Parts
World Travel Bureau, Inc., Various Mtg. Travel Expenses
Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage
Xerox Corp., Reproduction Service
George Yardley Assoc., Electric Supplies
Zodiac Paper Co., Reproduction Supplies
AMOUNT
188.72
73,350.:)0
28,723.08
1,301.31
. 3.20
100.08
382.04
37.31
481.56
707.23
308.50
53.89
37.62
832.8a
488.J.3
17.94
254.40
4.05
6:).0C)
1,128.46
685.65
136.90
2,073.28
264.GO
4:)9. 05
628 .12
324.54
57.18
963.26
58.82
60.04
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING $ 162,258.87
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING'FUND WARRANTS
· IN FAVOR OF
John Carollo Engineers, Engineering-Plant Constr.
Daily Pilot, Bid Notices E-:)69 & PW-031
E.T.I & Kordick, Contractor I-8~3
Engine & Compressor Supply Co., Test Equipment
Ficker Architects, Architect J-13
Mel Gorham Electric Co., Contractor P2-20
Hemisphere Constructors, Contractor P2-21
James E. Hoagland Co. & Hoagland Engr. Co., Contr. Pl-9-1
Franklin Miller, Inc., Pipeline Delumper
68,705.77
22.56
25,800.00
328.02
2,929. 50
7,123.23
107,173.24
61,332.:):)
5,966.22
38,231.61
1,683.10
239.60
572.93
24,440.0:)
J. Ray Construction Co., Contractor J-13
Rutan & Tucker, J-10 Trial Counsel ·
Twining Laboratories, Testing J-13, I-8-3 & P2-21
Wilmington Instrument Co., Instruments
F. T. Ziebarth & Ziebarth & Alper, Contractor J-4-1
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF
I-3
$ 344,547.88
$ 506,806.75
DISTRICT NO. 2
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
~ WP.. ANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
21210
21211
21212
21213
21214
21215
21216
21217
21218
21219
21220
21221
21222
21223
21224
21225
21226
21227
Chino Basin MWD, Construction Grant Transfer
County of Orange,· Compaction Test 2-14-1
Lowry and Associates, Engineering Service 2-15,
2-17, 2-18 & Construction Survey 2-14-1
Sully Miller Contracting Co., Contractor 2-14-1
Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Testing 2-14-1
DISTRICT NO. 3
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
The Register, Legal Notice Ordinance 304
2-16,
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Service 3-19, 3-20
. & Construction Survey 3-17, 3-17-1, 3-18
County of Orange, Compaction Test 3-17-1
McGuire Construction, Contractor 3-17-1
Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe ·Testing 3-18
Twining Laboratories, Concrete Testing 3-17-1
DISTRICTS NO. 3 & 11
SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Construction Survey 3-17
County of Orange, Compaction Test 3-17
Osborne Laboratories, Pipe Testing 3-17
J. F. Shea Co., Inc., Contractor 3-17
Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Testing 3-17
DISTRICT NO. 5
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
C~ty of Newport Beach, Connection Fee Collection
FACILITIES REVOINING FUND WARRANTS
The Irvine Co~pany, Bayside Drive R/A
II-1
$
$
AMOUNT
455,700.00
187.(!8
21,875.78
838,798.65
3,152.00
1,319,713.71
25.06
5,993.50
17.01
24,509.95
988.00
90.00
31,598.46
$ 31,623.52
216.00
128.61
450.00
314,856.00
l,4o4.oo
317,054.61
297.50
165,480.39
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 ·
~ SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF .
21228 A. G. Tutor Co., Inc & N. M. Saliba Co., Contr 5-19
II-2
AMOUNT
56,574.oo
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
21229
21230
21231
21232
21233
21234
21235
21236
21237
21238
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services .
Ervin Engineering, Refund Plan Check Fee Balance
. Vista Park Homes #4 et.al., Refund Plan Check Fee Balance
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Bo-Mar Construction, Contractor 7-5-lR
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Service 7-5-lR and
Construction Survey 7-2D-7
County of Orange, Compaction Test 7-5-lR
Thomas A. O'Sullivan and Ellis W. Stanley, Reinbursement
Agreement
Twining Laboratories, Compaction Test 7-5-lR
Westclock Development, Refund Permit Fees
DISTRICTS NOS. 1 & 7
SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Amack Deposition Service, Legal Services 7-6-1 Suit
-III-
$
$
$
AMOUNT
25.50
i.9.02
85.00
129.52
3,585.60
3,610.50
361.91
543.56
60.00
800.00
$ 8,961.57
$ 9,091.09
$ 29.56
'f.
·tr~~.::a~~3~-~¥~L.SJf 1T • JEFFERSON 4-3943 e GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA 9264.C
P. 0. 130X 1437
September 11, 1973
Orange County Sanitation District
10841 Ellis
Fountain Valley, California
Attention: Fred Harper
Dear Fred:
Re: Collection·of Sewer
Connection Fees
Confirming telephone conversation between y6u and Richard
Rafanovic of the.City of. Garden Grove, and the under8i~ned,
the Garden Grove Sanitary District is planning to collect
the County Sanitation District Sewer Connection Fee for
those portions of Districts No. 2 ·&· 3 that lie within the
city limits of Garden Grove only.·
It is our understanding that a contract covering this service
will be entered into between the Sanitation Districts and
our District, similar to the contracts you have with the
cities. Please send copies of the contracts for signature
by our officials. ·
Your cooperation in this ~~tter is appreciated.
WMB/rg
CC: City of Garden Grove
Attn: Mr. Rafanovic
Very truly yours,
U//!?Q?/~tf'
Walter M. Bressel,
Secretary
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ROOCRT H. MAIN. PRl'.SIDENT; VIALTl:R M. DRESSEL, St:CRf:TARY; Res;~ Pr'•ttE)Rf-~61X>N, ;r~..eR; NORMAN E. CULVER; ROUERT PEHRY
l,.lil. ~!rlJX>~l f~ '.:..;:•,:::: .:!.
\
-IV-
Chairman Finnell
Report of the Joint Chairman
Call meeting of the Executive Committe_e ____ for 5:30 p.m.,
--·--.... ----------
Tu~s4_september 25th. Invite Directo~li,nd
~or Directors Edwards and Garthe.
Entertain a motion to select an Alternate to Commissioner
Parsons on the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project.
(to replace Clifton Miller). It has been the habit of the
Alternate Commissioners to attend these meetings that are called,
and there is a $50 compensation provided. The Commission meets
once every two or three months.
. .
Report on meeting in Washington, D.C., October 1st, with EPA
Assistant Administrator John Quarles and Deputy Assistant Adminis-
trator Robert Sansom re: Best practicable waste treatment
technology and secondary treatment requirements for ocean dis-
chargers. Representatives will attend from Hawaii, Alaska,
Washington, and California. Our Districts will present.a
suggested definition·for "best practicable waste treatment
technology" based on the experimental work we have done at both of
our treatment facilities.
MEETING DATE Sept . 12 , 1 9 73 TIME 7:30 p .m. DI STR ICTS 1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ,7 & 11
DI STRICT 1
(G ARTHE) ..••.• ·f'AfTERSON• • · ~ ----
(C ASPERS) •.••. BATT IN.?[\-;>~------
DI STRI CT 2
RIMA .. ······~ .--SALTARELLI··~ ----
IT
..... ~vE~S ) · · · • · NE VIL······• _k::::::.. __ ---
b-IN GJ. ······CHAP UT······ ~ ___ _
CASPERS).···· CLARK······· ~ ___ _
CUL VER · .. • .. ~ ___ _
LANGE R) •••••• FI NNEL L..... ~ ___ _
Fox) ••••••••• KOWALSK I · ••• ~ ----
PATTE~SO N). • • GARTHE· · • • • • ~ ___ _
SCOTT).· ..•. • JUST· ... ~· .. ~ ___ _
REINH('.RDT). ··ROOT········ ~ ___ _
PEREZ)· • · • • • • SMITH· · · • • · • ,_.....--___ _
DUTTON).····· STEPHEN S ON ·· ~ ___ _
DUNNE).······ WIN N········ ~ ___ _
DISTRICT 3
lKOWALSl<J) ...• FOX......... ~ ----
CASPE ~S ) ..••• BATTIN ..•••• ~ ----
SALES) •..•••• B LACKM AN •..• ~ ----
CULVER •••••• ~ ----
(HINES) ....... DAV!S....... v' ----
ED WARDS . . • • • ,__...---. --~PATTE R$ON ) •.. GARTHE •••••• ~ ----
MATNEY) .•.••. GREEN .•.•.•• ~ ----
BR OWN ) .•..••• HYDE ...••••• ~ ___ --.
MARSHOTT. • • . ,.------· ~FRAN K I EWIC H). RO BER TS .•••. ~ ----
REINHARDT) ..• ROOT ..•.•••• ~ __ --. _
HOLLI NJ)EN) ••. SCOTT ..•.•.. ~ ___ _
~DUTTO N) ..•... STEPHENSON • _1::::::: ___ _
ROB ERTS) ••••• STEVENS ..••• ~ ___ _
BYRNE) ...•••• VANDERWAA L. ~--__
DISTRICT 5
(C RO UL) ...•.•• MC INNI S.... V-__ ·--
(BAKER) •...•.• CA SPERS ••••• ~ ___ _
JOI NT BOARDS
!LANGER) •••••
CASPERS) ••••
CASPE(<S) • • • •
SA LES) • • • • • •
FINNELL· • • • _.w:::::-_ --
BAKE R······ ~ --
BATTIN····· ~ --
BLAC KMA N··· ~ --
CASPE RS ···· o_., ~
(EWING) ••..•• CHAPUT"···· -1.::::::::. --
(CASPERS)···· CLARI<······ ~ --
CULVER····· ~ --
(HINES)······. DAVI S ·····~~
(MATNEY) ••.•• DUKE······· ...-----
KOWALSKI)· • • PA TTE R~ON) • •
MATNEY·····
MATN EY •·•••
BROWN)······
S COTT) • · • • • •
FOX) · • • · • · • •
MC lf~NIS) • · •
_ (CROUL) •.•..•
(S TEVEN S ) ••••
(C-AR TllE~ •.•••
EDWARDS····~___,.:.....
FOX········ ,,.........----
GARTHE· • • • • ~ --
GIBBS······~ __
GREEN······ v-__
HYPE······· ~ --
JUST····~·· ~ __
KOWALS I< I • • • -4.-==. __
KYMLA· ••• • • ~ __
MARSHOTT ••• _k::::::" __
MC I N N I S ., . .· ---k:::::: __
NEVIL...... , ___ _
Pf\TTERSON •• ___ _
PORTER .•• • • ---1L __
(BURTON) ••••• QUI GLEY· •• ·• ~ __
RI MA · • • • · • • .....--~F RANK i EWf CH) .ROBERTS •• •• ~ ==
J4G HHU Sf ••• RBGERS . ·• · • ___ _
RE INHA RDT) •• ROOT ... •.•· ~ _
SA LT AREL LI.~--
HOLL I tmEN). • SCO TT· · • • • • ~ __
PER EZ ) ••.••• SM IT H.····· ~ __
DUTT ON). • • . • STEPHENSON· ~ __
ROBERTS) • . • • STEV ENS· • • · ~ __
MC INjIS) ••• STO RE .. •••• \_-__
BYRNE •••••• VANDERWAA L. _k.:::::: __
(DUNNE ••••••• WINN ••....• V---__
KYMLA. . • • . • • ~ ----OTH ERS
DISTRICT 6
r ) POR TER · • • • • •
>CASPERS .•••. BATTIN .•••••
l MC IN NI S ) •.•• STO RE .•••••.
DI STRIC T 7
~---
~----. , ___ ----
; .. . ··SALTARELLI··~ ----1CASPER ~). ····CLAR I«······ ~......----__ --
.GART HEJ · · • • • • ·PPtT TERSGrq . • • -~ ----
PO RTER· · • • • · ~ ----
:BURTON)."····· QUIGLEY····· ~ ----
,MC IN NIS).··· RO G§RS·: ~~ , __ ----
.PERl=:Z ). ······SM! I H ~· · · · · ,,,....-----
DI STRICT 11
M.A TN EY) . ·: .... DU l<E ••••.••• _k:::: -----
:cA S PERs ) .•.• ·BAK ER · ....•. ~ ----
.MATNEY)··'·.,. ·G I BBS ······· ~ ----
9/1 2/73
HARPE R
SYLV ESTER
LE WIS
DUNN
CL ARKE
TAYL OR
BROWN .
NI SSON
BLISS
BOETTNER
CARLSON
FIN S TER
GALLO~/A Y
HOH.EN ER
HOWA RD
HUNT
KEITH
KEN NE Y
LYN CH
MADDOX
'MARTI NSO t~
PIE RSA LL
STEV ENS
-
MEETING DATE Sept. ~2, 1973 TIME 7:.30 p.m. D1stRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11
DISTRICT I
J (GARTHE) ••.••• P.A.TTeRSDtJ• .-. ------
(CASPERS) ••••• BATTIN· • • • • • --j-----. -
RIMA •••••••• ---y-.--
SALTARELLI·· -----
DISTRICT 2
s...--VENS · · • • • NEVIL······• ___:!__ --· --E~G) ••• • ••.• CHAPUT •••••• ~ ___ _
CASPERS) ••••. CLARK •• ••••• ~ ___ _
CULVER··.··. _____ _
LANGER) •••••• FINNELL •• ••• _L_ ___ _
FOX) •• ••••• •• KOWALSKI···. _.I ____ _
PATTERSON).·· GARTHE· • • • • • ~ ___ _
SCOTT)· • • • • • • JU ST· • • • ~ • • • _L_ __ __
RE I NHt\RDT) • • • ROOT· • • • • • • • _.:!.___ ___ _
PEREZ).······ SMITH······· _t__ ___ _
DUTTON).····· STEPHENSON·· _I ____ _
DUNNE).······ WINN········ _./ ____ _
DISTRICT 3
~KOWALSKI) •••• FOX ••••••••• _.J__ ---
CASPEBS) ••••• BATTIN .•.•.• _v ____ _
SALES) ••••••• BLACKMAN •••• -+ ----
CULVER •••••• ------
(HINES) ••••••• DAV1 S ••••••• _.1_ ----
EDWARDS ••••• -"---.--~PATTERSON) ••• GARTHE •••••• -~-.. ----
MATNEY) •••••• GREEN ••.•••• _v ____ _
BROWN) •••.••• HYDE •••••••• ~-----.
. . MARS HOTT. \j . .t.· ____ --·
FRANKIEHICH). ROBERTS .•• ~. ~ ___ _
RE I NHARDT) ••• ROOT ••••• ~ • • _.,·__ __ --. _
HOLLINPEN) ••• SCOTT ••••••. -~-___ _
DUTTON)~ ••••• STEPHENSON • •'
) -./-----ROBERTS ••••• STEVENS ••••• -T ___ _
BYRNE) ••••••. VANDERWAAL •• _____ _
DISTRICT 5
{CROUL). • •.••• MC INNIS •••• _./ ___ ·--
(BAKER) •...•.• CASPERS..... ~ ~-~-
KYMLA. • . • • • • v
DISTRICT 6
PORTER· • • • • • _v_ ----
(CASPERS) ••••• BATT IM ••• ·• •• _./_ ----
(MC INNIS) •••• STORE ••••••• -"'-----
JOINT BOARDS
CASPERS) •••• BAKER······ !LANGER)····· FINNELL···· ,,_,_ -
CASPE~s) •••• BATTIN·····~-
SALES) • • • • • • BLACKMAN· • • ~ --
CASPERS···· ----
(EWING)······ CHAPUT····· -""---.
(CASPERS)···· CLARK······ -"'---
CULVER····· _x_ --
(HINES) •••••• DAVIS······ --7---
( MAT N E Y ) • • • • • DU KE • • • • • • •
KOWALSKI)· • •
PATTERSON)· •
MATNEY)·····
MATNEY)·· • • •
BROWN) ••••••
SCOTT) ••• •••
FOX) • • • • • • • •
MC INNIS) •••
(CROUL) ••••••
. (STEVENS) ••••
(G.ARTHE) ••• • •
EDWARDS···· ~ ==::
FOX· • • • • • • • ~· ----GARTHE • • • • · _v--_ --
GI BBS······ _./ __ _
GREEN······ _L __
HYDE······· _v_ --
JUST······· _./_. __
KOWALSKI··· _v __ _
KYMLA. • • • • • _.,._ __
MARSHOTT. • • _\<, __ _
MC INNIS •• ~ -""-__
NEVIL •••••• _/ __ _
PATTERSON •• ____£__ __
PORTER .•••• _ ... /_. __
(BURTON). • • • • QUIGLEY •• ; • ___!!::__ __
RI MA. • . • • • • ~
~F~~~KI _.~WJCH) ___ ROBERT_S •. ••• ~, ==
MC tNNIS) .•• ROG-ffiS ,,4. __ •. _._~ __
REINHARDT) •• ROOT ••••• •• _J_· __
SALTARELLI. -",., __ _
HOLLI ('JDEN) •• SCOTT •• •••• -~.-__
PEREZ)... • • • SMITH ••• •• • _. __ _
DUTTON) ••••• STEPHENSON. _·.· __ _
ROBERTS). • • . STEVENS •• • • _ .. __ _
MC IN~ Is) ••• STORE •••• •• -~··-__
. {BYRNE •••••• VANDER~1AAL. _, __ _
(DUNNE ••••••• WINN ••••• •• . . __
OTHERS
/J f wax\_'<"''
01 {
1
· ·--. .{ .,· l (~-· / 1 -• :./~-.
, I (, ·.'
../
--y-
-:r -v:-
DISTRICT 7
( L -' ... I/~ (-l ' ~., ,
HARPER
SYLVESTER
LEWIS
DUNN
CLARKE
TAYLOR
BRONN /
7
p ~
. . ··SALTARELLI·· -~-----~CASPERS).···· CLARK······· ~-. ----~G/-\fffHE). • • • • • ~. • • _r/_ ----. ./
. PORTER· • • • • • -------' ) L" /A/ >BURTON • .. • • • QUIG E ,. • • • • -r ----
>MC I.NNIS). I •• R6GERS· ••••• ~ ----
.PEPr:zJ ••••... SMITH· •••.•• _____ _
DISTRICT 11 Q
~MATNEY)· ·: • • • ·DUKE· • • • • • • • -~.£ ----
;cASPERS) · • · • • BAKEP. ···:..It:·· -7-----~MATNEY)· ·f· ·.··GIBBS·· .• W. · ---------
DISTRICT 8
~JOHNSON).···· .
CLARK).······ CASPERS·~···
MITCHELL ••.
9/12/73
..-~, \., ,,
• ,~, i ·~· ... ez
--~f Tlc --•
NISSON
BLISS
BOETTNER
CARLSON
FINSTER
GALLOWAY
HOHENER
HOWARD
HUNT
KEITH
KENNEY
LYNCH
MADDOX
"MARTINSON
PIERSALL
STEVENS
l/
~
~
--.,,. .....
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
September 12, 1973 -7:30 p.m.
_ _;
...
BID T A B U L A T I. 0 N
SHEET
Date August ~l, 197~
ll:GO a.rn.
Contract For:
Printing of General. _P,r.ovisions. a.nd Standard S.f:E.C ifications
Specification No. P-002
l~
CONTRACTOR
R. H. Landin Graphics
Orange
2. Di-Line Corporation
Orange
3. White Sands Enterprises, Inc.
Santa. Ana
4. Impect Graphics
Garden Grove
5.
TOTAL BID
$ 5, 255. 48
5,552.28
6,042.00
8,829.01
It is my recommendation that the a.ward for Printing of
General Provisions and Standard Specif~ ations ·be m·ads to the .
·low bidder, R. H. Landin Graphic.s, e total amount ·of $5,255 .. 48
Agenda Item #9(c) -A-All Districts
BID TABULATION
SHEET
Date September 5, 1973
J.J.:OO a.m.
~ Contract For:
l.
2.
3 •.
4.
Bar Screen Chain
Specification No. E-069
CONTRACTOR
Power Products Co. (Moline Corp.·}
6237 Maywood Avenue
Huntington Park, Calif. 90255
.Barnes & Delaney
3330 E. 29th Street
. Long Beach, Calif. 90806
All Bearing Service, Inc.
264 No. Manchester Ave.
Anaheim, Calif. 92801
L. A. Rubber Co.
2915 E. Washington Blvd.
Los Angeles, Calif. 90023
Linear Industries. Ltd.
2620 So. Hill Street
TOTAL BID
$ 7,460.00
$ 9,497.60
$ 9,,595· 54
No bid
No bid
Los Angeles. Calif. 90007 -----_.:: __ __:~~~-=--~~=---~~..!.-----------~----------
It is my recommendation· that t.he award for the Bar Screen
Chain be made to the low bidder, Power Products Company (agent
for Moline Company), in the.total amount of $7,460.
Agenda Item #9(d) -B-
1 //}-/ /.J// / "'i~ . ~ l ~'"!/'_.,,<_
William N. Clarke
Ma~ntenance Superintendent
All Districts
B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N
SHEET
~ Contract For:
1.
Rebuild No. 1 Engine at Plant No. 1
. Specification No. PW-031
CONTRACTOR
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc.
17803 So. Santa Fe Avenue
Compton, Calif. 90221
Sep_tember 6, 1973
Date September 5, 1973
11:00 a.m.
TOTAL BID
$12,319.00
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.o:·aox 8121
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN. VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(7~4). 540-:!910
. (714) 962-2411
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Ray E. Lewis, Chief Ez1:gineer
William N. Clarke, Maintenance.Superintendent
Districts' Bid -PW-031 -Rebuild No. 1 Engine
at Plant No. 1
Bids were received on September 5, 1973· The low bid was
$12,319.00, to which we must add 8% for inspection and s·upervision,
making a total of $13,304.52 .
. As reported to you in my memorandum of August 31, the Districts'
forces can perform this job for $7,150. ·rt is therefore recommended
that authorization be obtained to proceed with the job, as specified,
using Districts' forces and that all other bid~ be rejected.
~ I concur in the above
'
Agenda Item #9(e) -C-All Districts
RESOLUTION NO. 73-130
REJECTING ALL BIDS TO REBUILD NO. 1 ENGINE
AT PLANT NO. 1 AND DIRECTING COMPLETION OF
WORK BY DISTRICTS' FORCE ACCOUNT LABOR
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
REJECTING ALL BIDS ON SPECIFICATION NO. PW-031,
AND DIREC 1rING THE WORK BE COMPLETED BY DISTRICTS'
FORCE ACCOUNT
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby
determine that:
WHEREAS, the Districts have published Notice Inviting Bids to
REBUILD NO. 1 ENGINE AT PLANT NO. 1, SPECIFICATION NO. PW-031, in
accordance with the provisions of Section 4755 of the State Health
and Safety Code, and on September 5, 1973, publicly opened and read
all bids submitted; and,
WHEREAS, said bids have been evaluated by the Districts' staff,
and the apparent low bid exceeds the staff's estimate by approximately
seventy-two percent (72%); and,
WHEREAS, the Maintenance Superintendent has· this day submitted
a written recommendation that all b~ds be rejected and work be
completed under the Districts' force a~count,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
Section 1. That the bid tabulation and recommendation of the
Maintenance Superintendent be received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That all bids received for said work be hereby
rejected and that all bid bonds ·be returned to the bidders; and,
.
Section 3~ That the Boards of Directors do hereby declare
that said work can be performed more economically by utilization of
Districts' forces; and,
Section 11. That the Districts' staff is hereby diJ·ected to
proceed with and complete Rebuilding No. 1 Engine at Plant No. 1,
Specification No. PW-031, by Districts' force account.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1973.
Agenda Item #9(e) -D-· All Districts
Copies ·to: Chm. Pinnc 11
H. Hunt
Ray Lewis w/enc. ·
STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY
STATE WAfrR RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
r·''ISION OF WATER QUALITY CONTROL
t\9l9'M 1015, RESOURCES WILDING
1416 NINTH STREET • SACRAMENTO 9.5814
"AUGUST 31, 1973
MR. fRED'A. HARPER, GENERAL MANAGER
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
P • 0 • Box 81 27 ·
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
DEAR Mn. HARPER:
RONALD REAGAN, Governor
SUBJECT: F.Y. 1973-74 CLEAN WATER GRANT PROJECT -EXPAND PLANT #2 •IEADWORKS PRIMARY
F'ACILITIES AtJD PROVIDE 75 MGD ADVANCED TREATMENT
ON JULY 11, 1973, THE STATE WATER RESOURCCS CONTROL Bo~RD ADOPTED CRITERIA F'OR
RANKING PROPOSED f.Y. 1973-74 SEWERAGE PROJECTS AND A CLEAN WATER GRANT PRIORITY
LIST DEVELOPED PURSUANT TO THAT CRITERIA~ ON AUGUST 16, 1973, THE STATE BOARD
ADOPTED AMEllDMENTS TO THC CLEAH \./ATER GRANT PROGRAM REGULATIONS, \./HICH ARE TO m:
APPLJGABLE TO F.Y. 1973-74 PROJECTS. A COPY OF THESE REGULATIONS IS ENCLOSED.
ON THE ADOPTED PRIORITY LJST 1 YOUR AGENCY HAS A PROJECT IN PRIORITY CLASS D.
SUCH A RAMKltlG \./ILL ALLOW CONSIDCRATION OF" THIS PROJECT fOR f"U!WIHG IN F.Y. 1973-
74. W1TH THIS LETTER YOU ARE HEREOY AUTHORIZCD TO PROCEED WITH PREPARATION or A .
PROJECT REPORT. It~ ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIOH 2115 Of THE Af.lENDEO GRANT REGULATIONS,
YOU HAVE BEEN ASSIGNED A PROJECT REPORT DUE PATE or MARCH 1, 1974 roR THE
ABOVE PROJECT.
IF TKIS PROJECT IS TO REMAIN ON THE F.Y. 1973-74 PRIORITY'LIST AND RECEIVE CONSI-
DERATION FOR FUNDING, YOU MUST SUOMIT YOUR PROJECT REPORT, WITH ALL SUPPORTING ..
OO~UNENTS 1 BY THIS DATE. HOWEVER, ff" THIS DATE PLACES AN ADVERSE TIME CON5TRAINT
UPON you, YOU MAY REQUEST A LATER "DUE DATE. CONVERSELY, IF WORK ON YOUR PROJECT
REPORT HAS PROGRESSCD TO THE STAGE WHERE YOU COULD SUBtJ.IT YOUR REPORT CARLI ER, YOU
MAY REQUEST AN EARLIER DUE DATE. ANY SUCH REQUESTS SHOULD DE SUBMl~TED DY
OCTOBER 1, 1973.· IN NO CASE WILL AN ASSIGNED PROJECT REPORT DUE DATE FALL DEFOnE
NOVEMBER 1, 1973, OR SUDSCQ.UtNT TO MAHCH 1, 1974.
APPLICANTS ARC APPRISED or SECTION 2121 Of THE GRANT REGULATIONS WHICH REQUIRES
PROJECT REVIEW /\tlD CONCEPT APPROVAL TO {3£ ror.THCOl·11tJG WITHIN 120 DAYS CF PROJECT
REPORT DUC Dl\TE. To r.:r.:ET THI$ SCH!-:DULC, IT \·/ILL OE CRITJCAL THAT PROJ:::CT r.::PORTS
ARE co:,1PLETE AIJD COMPf\EH!::tlS I VE. I NFORMAT I Ot~ f\CQUESTED IN THC Pi10JECT f~CPORT
GUIDELll~CS ~~U~T OE INCLUDCD 1\t·~D SUCMITTED IN THE PROJt.CT REPORT. Rt:QUCSTS TO
THE APPLICMlT FOR ADDITIOf~AL INFOR:~/\TIOH NOT INITIALLY Pf:OVIDED \·!ILL U~~tlF:CES5! ... RILY
DELAY THC: r.cv1r.w Pf\OCCSS AIW l·~/\Y RESULT It~ fAILUf\~ TO HECEIVE CONCEPT APPHV/,\l
WIHlltl THE 120-DAY PCRIOD. Fr~OJCCTS MOT APPl~OVCD IH THE 120-DAY PCRIOD \/ILL OE
CARRIED OVEH TO A FUTURC FISCAL YEAR.
IN V 1£\-/ OF RECENT CH/\flGE:5 IN THE FEDERAL AIW STATE GRANT PROG:1AM$ ANC IN AM EFF011T
TO HCLP MUtllCIPALITIES THROUGH TllE Gl\M~T Pf\OCEss, THE GnANT TEAM !J"aAFr HOPES TO
\.'ORK VCRY CLo:;cLY \-/ITH /\LL Gl~Ain APPLICANTS O.N THIS YEAR'S PROJECTS. \-!E INTEND TO
..
Agenda Item #13 E-1 All Districts
FRED A. HARPER, GENERAL MANAGER -2-AUGUST 31, 1973
MEET PERIODICALLY WITH EACH APPLICANT AS THE PROJECT REPORTS ARE BEING PREPARED.
THE PURPOSE or THESE ~~ETINGS WILL BE TO MAKE EACH APPLICANT FULLY AWARE or
rcoERAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS AND TO HELP THE APPLICANT AVOID PITFALLS THAT
COMMONL y PLAGUE GRANT PROJECTS. THE r I RST s·TE p THAT MUST BE TAKEN BY EACH
APPL I CANT Is THE COM PL ET I ON AMO SUBMITTAL OF THE ENCLOSED "KEY ACT I or~ QUESTIONNAIRE. ti
THIS QUESTIONNAIRE SHOULD BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE SO THAT
OUR STAFf CAN EVALUATE THE DATA AND BE PREPARED TO ASSIST YOU IN OVERCOMING PRESENT
OR POTENTIAL PROBLEMS.
IT IS SUGGESTED THAT YOUR AGENCY INITIATE THESE STAFF LEVEL MEETINGS BY CONTACTING
THE GRANT TEAM EVALUATOR ASSIGNED TO YOUR P~OJECT. WE WILL IN TURN CONTACT THE
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTtCTION AGENCY AND TH~ REGIONAL BOARD. AN INITIAL MEETING SHOULD
OE SCHEDULED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE WITH SUBSEQUENT MEETINGS BEING SCHEDULED AT KEY
POINTS IN THE PROJECT REPORT FORMULATION.
ASSIGNMENT or EVALUATORS TO SPECIFIC PROJECTS HAS NOT BEEN MADE AT THIS TIME.
Howcvrn, GEN,ERAL AREAS WITHIN THE STATE HAVE BEEN ASSlGNED TO ONE OF TWO E.VALUATION
TEAMS. REGIONS 2, 5A, 58, 5C, AND 8 ARE IN EVALUATION TEAM A -TEAM LEADER,
MR. GARY t·lORRIS. REGIONS 1, 3, 4,.50, 6, 7, AND 9 ARE IN EVALUATION TEAM B -
TEAM LEADER, MR. DONALD HODGE. CONTACT WITH THE APPROPRIATE TEAM LEADER MAY BE
MADE REGARDING MEETlNGS ON YOUR PROJECTS.
REVISED PROJECT REPORT GUIDELINES WILL BE PROVIDED IN EARLY SEPTEMBER. THESE
GUIDELINES WILL BE SIMILAR IN CONTENT TO THOSE or PREVIOUS YEARS EXCEPT THAT
GREATER DETAIL Of THE SPEClflC INFORMATION REQUIRED WILL BE PRESENTED IN A
SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT GUIDELINE FORMAT. GREATER EMPHASIS WILL BE GIVEN TO THC
DEVELOPMEtJT AND EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE PROJECTS AND TO THE FORMULATION OF
THE RE COM MEN DE D PROJECT. THE MAJOR NEW RE QUI R EME N·ts ADDED TO THE GU I DEL INES
~ILL BE· THE INFILTRATION/INFLOW ANALYSIS AND COST-EFFECTIVE ANALYSIS PURSUANT TO
THE 1972 AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT. . .
·FURTHER QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION R~GARDING THIS NOTICE MAY BE OBTAINED BY CON-
TACTING EITHER AFOREMENTIONED EVALUATION TEAM LEADER AT (916) 322-2640.
SINCEnELY 1
~1 2' Wedd
LARRY F /\•/f\LKER ·~__,
ASSISTANT DIVISION CHIEF
MANACCR -CLEAN WATER GRANT PROGRAM
ENCLOSURE:
Agenda Item #13 E-2 All Districts
SACRAMENTO AOORESS
STATE CAPITOL 95014
TELEPHONE: (9H5) 445·5031
DISTRICT AOORESS
3912 CAMl'US DRIVE
VPORT BEA.CH, C" 92660
~ ( 714) ~57-3200
DENNIS E. CARPENTER
THIRTY· FOURTH SEN ... TORIA.L DISTRICT
ORANGE COUNTY
CALIFORNIA LEG! SLATURE
A~gust 18, 1973
Mr. Robert F. Finnell
County Sanitation Districts
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain ·valley, California 92708
Bob,
COMMITTEES
SENATE SUllCOMMITTES: ON CIVIL
OISOROER, CHAIR.,,N
ELECTIONS ANO REAl'PORTIONMl!:NT
FINANCE
INSURANCE ANO FIN"NC:IAL
INSTITUTIONS
NATURAL RESOURCES ANO
WILOl..IFI!:
JOINT COMMITTEES
MASTER Pl.AN FO!'l HIC>iE"<
EOUC:ATION
REVISION OF THE El..ECTIONS COOK
COMMISSION OP' THE CAl..IFORNIAS
I am in receipt of your correspondence .dated July 23 relating
to. the City of Westminster's Resolution No. 14 76 relating to
the adoption of City discretionary control of routes selected
for rights of way in public s~reets.
This is to briefly acknowledge your correspondence and thank
you for the comments you have made relating to this.subject.
You may be assured that as legislation of this type is brought
to my attention, either on Committee or on.the Floor, I will
certainly" give the matter a very careful study before casting
my vote.
Thark you for your time and interest in keeping me informed
on these matters.
DEC:.Bet
Agenda Item #14
DENNIS E. CARPENTER
Senator, 34th District
:-F-All Districts
.--; . ?J/ .
/)./)/).AA_ ' ()/,,/,. DISTRICT OFFICE r ll.. /" r. 8100 GARDEN GROVE BLVD .•
GARDEN GROVE, CALIF. 92641
TEL1 AREA CODE 714
638-7401
.j ,.
:
SACRAMENTO ADDRESS ~s£emhI t!
STATE CAPITOL
COMMITIEES
Education
Efficiency and Cost Control
Elections end
ReopPortionment
Revenue and Taxation
~~ 9.SOl4 QJaHfu.mict IQcsi.sln±ure
.. --~
"\
1
(
. I
1
I
<
i
I
' !
TELa AREA CODE 916
.US-7446 ' .. ~.-...... ,. . . ~ :-? ~:~~--.-:-·.·· .. ~---~~---:--__-........ _ -·· --"::.'.
~~·:.~:.:·i~·,. KENNETH CORY
./ • • ,. • . ASSEMBLYM>\N, SIXTY-NINTH DISTRICT
DEMOCRATIC CAUCUS CHAIRMAN
~
August 10, 1973
Mr. Robert Hinnell
County Sanitation Districts
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Dear Mr. Hinnell:
Thank you for your letter in opposition to a
proposed resolution of the .. city of Westminster relating
to local legislative approval of planned facilities
owned by another .governmental entity.
I am cognizant of the issues involved and feel
that we really need a coordinating planning body.
However, previous legislation to establish the right
of one governmental agency to approve the facilities
planning of another has heretofore been unsuccessful,
and I do not believe such .legislation ·could successfully
be enacted at thjs time.
I ·appreciatr receiving your views. zrel
KENNETH CORY
KC:Mr
~ -... -..... ~-.!"II;--• ------: ·· T-·-r . ..f :t 111 ... ,...._.........,,....-.. .,-_,-.. -: ~ .... ·~
Agenda Item #°14 -G-· All Distrrcts ··
'·
CITY OF IRVINE
POST OFFICE BOX OZ
IRVINE. CALIFORNIA 92664
TELEPHONE (7t4) 833-3840
~ugust 8, 1973
County Sanitation Districts,of
Orange County
P. 0. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Gentlemen:
In response to the communication dated July 23, 1973 from the
Chairman of the Joint Administrative Agency of the County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County, please be advised that
the Irvine City Council upon consideration of Westminster
Resolution No. 1476 determined that it would take no action
at this time other than to receive and file.
Thank you for informing us of your position in this matter.
Sincerely,
~;p~?~
City Clerk
cjf
Agenda Item #1Li -H-All Districts
CITY OF YORBA LINDA • Telephone 524-5000
Post Office Box A • 4845 Main Street • Yorba Linda, California 92686
. Robert J. Finnell, Chairman
Joint Administrative Agency
Orange County Sanitation District
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92808
Dear Mr. Finnell:
August 8, 1973
The Yorba Linda City Council, at its regular meeting of
August 6, 1973, consi.dered your communication of July 23, 1973
requesting that the City Council withhold support of the
position of the City of Westminster regarding routes selected
by special districts for rights-of-way in public streets.
The Yorba Linda City Council, at its regular meeting of
June 18, 1973, adopted Resolution No. 544, a copy of which is
enclosed, concurring with Westminster's resolution. A copy
of Yorba Linda's resolution was sent to the legislative repre-
sentative from our area as well as to the Orange County League
.of Cities.
Thank you for advising us of the Sanitation District's feelings
on this matter.
dj :lm
Enclosure
* * * E\iRTHPlACE OF RICHAPD NIXON -37th PRESIDENT OF TtfE UNITED STATES * * *
·-Jrgenda Item #14 · I-1 All Districts
RESOLUrIO:l IW. 544
A RESOLUTIO~ OF THE CITY cou~:crL OF THE CITY OF
YORBA LHJD~\, REQUESTn:c STATE LEGISL\TIO~ TO CLARIFY
PROVISimrs OF LN·l RELATING TO. THE USE OF. CITY STREETS
··:
WHEREAS, the location of. public utilities and other facilities within street
rights-of-way require a permit fror.a th~ City prior to installation, ?.n.d
WHEREAS, a ·recent court decision found th,1.t the issuance of such perm.its·
was a "ministerial" act not subject to discretion on the part of the legislative
body,. and
WHEREAS, a neighboring Orange County City recently did not concur ~1ith the
location of a proposed Orange County Sanitation District lin2 and expressed the
opinion that an alternate location would be more suitable from an environ.~~ntal
standpoint; ho~ever, due to the above-referenced court decision, said City
could not legally voice its objections.
NOW_, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Ci~y Council of the City of Yorba
' Linda as follows:
.I
SECTimT 1. That the State legislative representatives of Orange County
be requested to introduce and sponsor legislation to enable cities to have a
greater voice in the specific location of underground facilities within street
rights-of-way.
SECTimr 2. That such legislation provide that unilateral decisions by
special purpose units of governm2nts shall require concurrence of the legislative
body of the appropriate unit of local governnent, or in the alternative permt
a determination. by a court of competent jurisdiction.
SECTION 3. That the City Clerk is.hereby instructed to send copies of
this Resolution to the Oranee County representatives in th~ State Legislature
and the Orange County League of Cities. .
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council· of the City of Yorba Linda
at a regular me~ting held on the 18th da~ of June, 1973.
/s/ Carolyn Peirce Ewing
CAROLYN PEIRCE BHNG
Mayor of the City of Yorba Linda
ATTEST:
/sf Ar~hur C. Simonian
ARTHUR C. SIHmrIAll
City Clerk of the City of Yorba Linda
STATE OF CALIFOP~HA) SS
·com~TY OF OIWIGE ) .
I, ART.HU~ C. SIHONIA1.'I, City Clerk of th2 City oE Yorba Lind.2, Califo.r:J.iil,
DO HE7..EBY CEP..TI~Y that the f o:!:'e6::>ing l?.~.sohition W::!.3 ac~opted at a ~~ gular
meetil!g of the City ~oc..:ncil of th~ City of Yorl>:i Linda held on th2
~ 18th cby of Jun2, 1973, a~J U.'.1:1 carried by the follm:in:; -r-all c~ll
vot2, to t;Jit:
AYES:
~WES:
ADS~::!.':
Agenda Item #14
COUlTCIUl.Si: Ci~~put, Ha<.:h :i~fo, Hec~aa, and E~rir.g
com:cIU:2:J: ::on~
cou:·lCIL~·i:::!: C?.~; tr~
I-2
I .ct I Ar:..t.b..'..:::. __ c4--~ ..... · _._·i ,.........__,..., .... ~, ...... : __ ..,_~-------
Ci.ty C.Lcr!' of tl1~ City of Yoi:'b:-! Lirld.:i
All D'istrict~~
Orange County
COMMISSIO.N:
..,,,,.; CARL J. KYr..1LA
Chairman
WILLIAM F. HURST
Vice Chairman
HENRY T. SEGERSTROM
Secretary
County Sanitation Districts
P.O. Box 8127 .
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Gentlemen:
Water rJJ a n a g e rn e n t
1629 WEST SEVENTEEl'JTH STREET
SANTA ANA. CALIFOnNIA. onoR
Agency
In the latter part of April of this year the Joint Powers Agreement (the Agreement) creating the
Orange County Water Management Agency (OCWMA) was executed by the Irvine Ranch Water
District, Moulton-Niguel Water District and the Orange County Water District. The general purposes
of the Agency are to develop, provide, protect, improve and preserve the quality and quantity
of the available water supplies to the area from all sources including subsurface supplies, imported
water and reclaimed wastewater. The purposes of the Agency also include the preparation and
accomplishment on a continuing basis of a Waste Management Planning Program. Implicit in these
objectives is the desire to afford all interested entities the opportunity to join with the present
Members of the Agency in pursuing these and related goals with a united, coordinated and mu tally
beneficial effort. It was realized from the outset that the extent of desired involvement in a given
instance may vary among the various Members of the Agency. For this reason, the Agreement was
prepared in a manner which would permit a Member to be involved in the general affairs of the
Agency but not in the benefits and attendant financial obligations of a particular project.
Paragraph four on page number five of the Agreement creating the Agency, a copy of which is
enclosed herein, was included to implement the desire for broad local representation by those
interested entities which are empowered by their particular enabling legislation to participate in
the Agency. If such should be the case, we request that your deci~ion in this regard be communi-
cated to us. In order to avoid a duplication of effort in obtaining the requisite approval of the present
Members of the Agency, we would appreciate hearing from you in this regard prior to October 25,
1973. At that time it is contemplated the existing Members of the Agency will be asked to approve
the in· lusion of those entities which have expressed their desire to become Members of the Agency.
As the Agreement reflects, the common powers of the Members of the Agency involve not only
activities undertaken by those involved in domestic and agricultural water production and supply but ·
activities involving water pollution, control and reclamation. An initial review of various· enabling
acts has indicated that some disparities exist relative to the requirement that a proposed Member
possess the required common powers. It appears that, provided the election or alternative procedure
provided for in the California Water District Law has been accomplished, there is no problem in
regard to entities existing under the California Water District Law. This is also true as to a Com-
munity Services District. As to a Municipal Water District, a County Sanitation District, a County
Waterworks District and a County Water District, it does not appear that there is a problem. Similarly,
no such problem exists in regard to a City becoming a Member of the Agency. However, in the
absence of an election under Section No. 22171 of the Water Code a definitive answer is not pos-
sible as to the adequacy of the powers that may be exercised by an Irrigation District. In regard to
Soil Conservation Districts, and the Orange County Flood Control District, it does not appear that
the enabling legislation applicable in these instances is sufficient. to permit such entities to become
a Member of the Agency under the Agreement in its present form. Similarly, this is true of a Sanitary
District formed under the Sanitary District Act of 1923. The l 972 amendment to Section No. 6512
of the Health and Safety Code is of limited assistance in this regard.
Agenda Item #15 J-1 All Districts
County Sanitation Districts
July 27' 1973
Page Two
While several of the e.nabling acts considered appear to create some difficulty in regard to this matter,
it would seem desirable in the event any such ·entities desire to become a Member of the Agency to
consider amending the Agreement so as to permit such to occur. In the event that it is desirable to
pursue any such amendment to the Agreement it would be necessary prior to the inclusion of any
such entities as Members of the Agency to insure that the proposed amendment does not interfere
with any possible future financing that the Agency might wish to undertake at a later date.
Please feel free to contact the undersigned and other Commissioners in regard to the Agency; further
we will be available to meet with your staff as well as your Board of Directors at your request.
Respectfully submitted,
ORANGE COUNTY WATER MANAyEMENT AGENCY
CJK:slh ·
Enclosure
Agenda Item #15. J-2 All Districts
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
PROGRESS REPORT
TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS
P2-11-l -HEADWORKS "C" EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2 -($1,261,693)
P.O. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA n708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
NEW MAIN SEWAGE PUMPS: One under operational test. Bearing being replaced in
other.
NEW BAR SCREENS: New bar screens and drives are operational and have been in
use since April.
NEW GRIT CHAMBERS: In service. Repair work is required prior to acceptance.
NEW METER VAULT: In service. Painting only remaining work.
FOUL AIR SCRUBBER: Operational testing underway to determine best mode of
operation and to provide data for secondary treatment design.
REHABILITATION OF HEADWORKS "B": Not scheduled to start until all new facets
of Headworks "C" are operational.
Contract approximately 91 percent complete to date.
I-8-3 -INFLUENT METERING AND DIVERSION STRUCTURE -($1,485,679)'
~€NT CHANNEL: Concrete channel 95 percent complete and backfilled. No ·
conne . .:tion can be made until main structure is completed.
INFLUENT PIPING: Sunflower, Santa Ana, Euclid and Interplant Trunks extended
to structure. Euclid and Sunflower Trunk bypasses in service. No connections
can be made until structure is in service •.
METERING AND DIVERSION STRUCTIJRE: Forming and·pouring PVC lined concrete
removable walls. Installing sluice gates.
Contract approximately 56 percent complete to date.
P2-20 -POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT PLANT NO. 2 -($158,294)
No site work is expected until all equipment has been delivered.
Contract approximately 14 percent complete to date.
Agenda Item #17 K-1 All Districts
Progress Report
Treatment Plant Projects
·Page Two
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
Pl-9-1 -ADDITIONAL SECONDARY TREATMENT AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 -($814,943)
DIGESTER GAS CO~WRESSOR: Delivered, however, base not complete and corrections
are required mechanically.
NEW INCINERATOR, CONVEYOR AND RAMS: Brick~ incinerator complete. Conveyor
and one new hydraulic ram table installed.
PLANT WATER PUMP STATION: Concrete structure compl'ete. Tunnel piping and
service to headworks installed. Disc water screen being installed.
TRICKLING FILTER: Distributor is being corrected.
CITY WELL WATER PUMP STATION: Installed hydropneumatic and air break tanks.
Piping and pumps complete. Control components required to make Station
operational on City water.
NEW WELL: Well pump installed. Making piping and electrical connections.
Contract approximately 78 percent complete to date.
·P2-21 -DIGESTERS "N" AND "0" AT PLANT NO. 2 -($1,076,514)
DIGESTERS "N" AND "0": Digesters essentially structurally complete.
DIGESTER CONTROL BUILDING: Beginning construction on foundation and lower
walls.
TUNNELS: Forming and pouring concrete walls.
DIGESTER GAS CO?vWRESSORS: Equipment not yet delivered.
STORM WATER PUMP STATION: Structure essentially complete.
Contract approximately· 43 percent complete to date.
J-13 -SHOPS AND WAREHOUSE FACILITIES -($1,061,989)
~ Deep sewer mains which pass under project area co.mplete. Rough. grading complete.
Structural layout complete.
Rough electrical and plumbing being installed.
Agenda Item #17 · K-2 All Districts
Progress Report
Treatment Plant Projects
Page Three
J-13 -·SHOPS AND WAREHOUSE FACILITIES (Continued)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
Structural excavation and footing construction underway. Forming and pouring
tilt up panels.
Contract approximately 16 percent complete to date.
J-4-1 -INCREASED WATER REUSE FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2 -($624,643)
CITY WATER PUMP STATION: Structures complete. Waiting for equipment to make
system operational.
CHLORINE WATER PUMP STATION: Structure complete. Pumps have been installed.
Installing water screen. Electrical gear corrections required to make station
operational.
PLANT WATER PUMP STATION: Slab, masonry walis, roof and ducting for electrical
room and chlorination area constructed. No mechanical work can be done until
chlorine water ptimp. ·station operational. ·Motor control centers installed in
electrical room to provide power for chlorine water facility~
~·VALVES AT ROTHROCK PUMP STATION: ·Operational.
SHA:CER SCREENINGS CONVEYOR AND HOPPER: Area paved. Hopper relocated and new
live bottom hopper installed and drive reworked.
Contract approximately 69 percent complete .to date.
TREATMENT PLANT WORK
Total Value· Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Total Work During July
Total Work Under Design
DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK
Total Amount Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Total Work During July
Total Work Under Design
$ 6,483,755
3,718,852
. 281,049
26,500,000
$19,444,773
10,725,201
1,286,277
5 ,67·5' 000
TOTAL AMOUNT UNDER CONTRACT .& DESIGN
September 6, 1973
Ae;enda Item 1117 K-3
$ 6,483,755
26,500,000
.H ,444, 773
5,675,000
$58,103,528
All Districts
RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVING STANDARD AGREEMENT FCP. COLLECTICN ·oF
SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES WI1B CITY OF ·
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION. DISTRICT NO._?_, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF SEWER
CONNECTION CHARGE.S WITH THE CITY OF ---------
* * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.1_,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain agreement dated , ---------
by and between County Sanitation District No._?_and the CITY OF
---------for collection of connection charges, ~s provided
1n Sewer Connection Ordinance No. 203, as amended, is hereby approved
and adopted; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of t:1e District
are hereby authorized and directed to execute said at:;£'eement ..
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular ~eeting held September 12, 1973.
Agenda Item #25 (a) -L-Districts 2 & 3
RESOLUTION NO. -------
APPROVING SUPPLEMENT TO STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR
COLLECTION OF SEWEH CONNECTION CHARGES WITH
CITY 0F1 --------------------
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF SUPPLEMENT TO srrANDARD AGREEMENT FOR .. COLLECTION
OF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES WITH THE CITY OF
INCORPORATING
-n=H~OL~D~H~A.,...,,R~M-=L,...,,,E.,,....,,S~S~"r--=P-=R...,,.O~V.....,.I"""""s"'"""r_o__,N ...... S--,--rfi~IE..,,,..R.E IN
* * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors o.f County Sanitation .. District No. 2 --
of Orange County, California,
·.
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the Supplement dated August 8, 1973, to
that certain Standard Agreement £or Colledtion of Sewer Connection
Charges by and between County Sanitation District No. 2 and the ·
CITY OF f.or collection of Sewer ---------------
Connection Charges, as provided in Sewer Connection Ordinance
No. 203 , as amended, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and ·secretary of the District
are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1973.
Agenda Item #25(b) -M-Districts 2 & 3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
September 6, 1973
. TO:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Fred Harper, General Manager
STATUS REPORT-COLLECTION OF CONNECTION
CHARGES PURSUANT TO ORDINANCES 203 & 303
(714; 540-2910
(714) 962-~411
On June 20 of this year, letters from the Chairmen of
District 2 and 3 were sent to the city councils within
those two Districts. The basis of this correspondence
was to request the cities' cooperation in.collecting
connection charges for both residential and commercial
developments pursuant to Ordinances 203 and 303, which
were adopted earlier this Spring.
As of this date, agreements for collection of sewer
connection charges have been approved by the following
city councils: Anaheim, Brea, Buena Park, Cypress,
Fountain Valley, Fullerton, Huntington.Beach, La Habra,
La Pa'lma, Los Alamitos, Orange, Placentia, Santa Ana,
·v111a Park, and Yorba Linda.
The following cities have yet to approve collection
of connection charges:
SEAL BEACH-The city council of Seal· Beach has yet to
take action on the proposed agreement, however, it is
scheduled .to be an agenda i tern at their next regular
meeting on September 10th. ·
GARDEN GROVE-Within the last month, we have received
verbal requests from the Garden Grove Sanitary District
indicating their desire to act as the collection agent
for the City of Garden Grove as well as all properties
located within their jurisdiction. Difficulties lie,
·however, in the non-contiguous boundaries of the Garden
Grove Sanitary District. Currently that Sanitary District
acts as the sewering agency for the majority of the City
of Garden Grove, as well as small portions of Anaheim,
Orange, Santa Ana, Stanton, Westminster, and uninc·or-
porated areas.
.Agenda Item #25(c) N-1 Distrlcts 2 & 3
page two
Status Report-Collection of Connection
Charges Pursuant to Ordinances 203 & 303
September 6, 1973
COUNTY SANITATION. DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
WESTMINSTER AND STANTON-In light of discussions between
the Sanitary District and the cities of Westmins~er and
Stanton, both cities somewhat question which agency would
.be better equipped to collect the fees. The matter is
further complicated in the fact that the City of West-
minster also receives sewer services not only from the
Garden Grove Sanitary· District, but from the Midway City
Sanitary District as well.
At their regular meeting on September 5, 1973, the Boarq
of Directors of the Midway City Sanitary District expressed
their feeling that the intent of Ordinance No. 303 was
that collection charges· were to be collected through the
City Building Departments; and, they further expressed
their intent not to participate in the collection of
charges. · ·
Should the City of Westminster elect not to collect the
required fees through their Building Department, charges
would have to be collected at the County Sanitation
Districts' office for property within the City of
Westminster sewered by the Midway City Sanitary District.
As of .. this date, the City of Stanton has yet to declare
.its intent in collecting charges through their Building
Department. The City of Stanton is sewered by both the
Carden Grove Sanitary District as well as the Stanton
County Water District. Should the Stanton City Council
elect not to participate, an agreement with the Stanton
County Water District would have to.be consummated or
dev.elopers within that portio'n of· Stanton sewered by
.Stanton County Water District, would be required to pay
the connection fees at the County Sanitation Districts'
office.
RAW: ch
Agenda Item #25(c) N-2
Robert A. Webber
Chief of Industrial
and Permit Division.
Districts 2 & 3
RESOLUTION NO. 73-136-3
AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS RE
ANNEXATION NO. 3E -INHABITED -BOLSA.CHICA
ROAD ANNEXATION
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE INITIATION
OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT
(PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 3E -INHABITED -BOLSA
CHICA ROAD ANNEXATION)
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
That an application for annexation of territory to itself be·
made to the Local Agency Formation Commission as follows:
Sectj_on 1. That this proposal is made pursuant to Di vision 1
(District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code
of the State of California; and,
Section 2. That this application is for the purpose of annexing
approximately 53.6 acres in the vicinity of the U. S. Naval Ammunition
Depot at Bolsa Chica Road and Westminster Avenue, which said annexation
is hereby requested by this Board of Directors; and,
Section 3. That the territory to be annexed is inhabited; and,
Section 4. That the designation assigned to the territory
proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 3E -Inhabited -Bolsa Chica
Road Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 3", the boundaries
of which are more particularly described and delineated on Exhibit "A"
and Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by reference made a part of this
resolution; and,
Section 5. That provisions for all fees required to be paid as
a condition of the annexation must be satisfied prior to completion of
annexation proceedings; and,
Section 6. That request is hereby made that such proceedings
as required by law be taken to complete t~is annexation.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1973.
Agenda Item #26(b) -0-District 3
MEMORANDUM
September S, 1973
TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager ,
FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
SUBJECT: Knott Interceptor Sewer -Contract No. 3-17
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
1084.C ELLIS AVE!'IUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(71.C) 962-2411
To date, work has progressed to approximately 2QO-feet north of Heil Avenue
on Newland Street. Work at the intersection of Heil and Newland continues
with the construction of several manholes and the tie-ins of local sewers.
The reach of 96" RCP south of Heil was particui"arly difficult due to the
requirement to bypass local· sewage while relocating the City of Huntington
Beach's 12" and 15" VCP sewers to a location parallel to this project.
Work on this relocation was accomplished by pumping during the day while
construction was being done and diverting the sewage back into the newly
completed line at night so that noise would not be a.problem~
All work in the tunnel under the San Diego Freeway is complete. Pipe was
pushed into the tunnel on rails, and the periferal area between the pipe and
the tumel was filled with grout.
The water lines on Bushard and Ellis were tested and Ellis, Bushard and Talbert
were paved up to the Flood Control Channel on Talbert.
The pipeline from Brookhurst and Ellis to Warner and Newland will be ready to
accept sewage as soon as the manhole structure south of Warner has been
completed. When this work has been done and the bulkhead at Brookhurst and
Ellis has been removed, sewage will be diverted into the new line.
REL:BEW:hjm
Agenda Item #27 . -P-District 3
' I
I
I·
I
I .
I·
I
l.
FOUNiAlN
\JALl,;C"Y
J Cpm gle /e
ft E//;'.;;
. ;
I
'
:rt:·~.<: 1;u/' t1 I
<l .
t.
~ .
..,.;:::i::::r:P . HUN11NG TCN
e~ACH
·.
MA6N OLIA
FOUNT~lN \'ALL~
--Carnp/:;/e
. · ..
---lo be C<JJ7 :Jifr,:/cled
t
I .
I
51R . -T
·.
lf6fN D
i.
[ i
'· I I
i
I
I
I
I
l
' I ··1
l
I .
. !
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
September·. 5, 1973
Fred A. Harper, General Manager
Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
COUNTY S°ANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. o~ ·aox 8121
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71"4) 5"40-29i0
(714) 962-2411
Bolsa Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 10, Contract No. 3-17-1 and
Bolsa Avenue Storm Drain
Work continues in the intersection of Bolsa and Magnolia, however, all
work is confined to the east side of Magnolia. The west side has been
backfilled, compacted and the first course of permanent pavement has
been placed. Currently the Contractor is realigning the sewers belong-
ing to the Midway City Sanitary District so that the concrete box storm
drain can be continued through this area.
Since all of Bolsa between Magnolia and Newland is to be paved by the
Cotmty Road Department soon.after this project is completed, the
Contractor has been instructed to place only a leveling course over
his trench.. Manholes are to ce raised to grade when the County finishes
their work.
Traffic will continue to use the west side of Magnolia for several more
days •. All work on this project is expected to be completed by
·September 15, 1973.
_REL: BEW:hjm
Agenda Item #27 -Q-District 3
MEMORANDUM
· September ·s, 1973
TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager
FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
.. ~
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
. 108-44 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71'4) 540-2910
(714) 962-2-411
SUBJECT: Knott Interceptor, Reach 4 -Contract No. 3-18
The Contractor continues to submit shop drawings and pipe layout diagrams
for approval. The start of construction is scheduled for September 17,
1973 at Newland and Bolsa, and the tunnel bore pit wil~ be started on
September 10, 1973. Traffic on Bolsa at .Beach Boulevard is one way west
and permission has been granted, when construction is commenced, to close
Bolsa from Newland Avenue to Beach Boulevard to all through traffic. The
Contractor has started dewatering f~·om Newland to Beach and a 100-foot
construction easement on the south side of ·Bolsa has been obtained.
Currently, Hydro-Conduit, the pipe supplier, is anticipating a strike at
its Irwindale facility. This could hold up the start of the main heading
but should have no effect on the construction schedule for the tunnel
at Beach Boulevard.
REL:BEW:hjm
Agenda Item #27 -R-District 3
' I 0: -\ •
.. ---{., :o·Mj:; / e l e. 1
---To be con :S/ryc !~cl .
....-
~
0
0
0 > Ill
~ 0
W~Tlvt lN 5Tt"~
MC-MOl<lAI.. ..
PA~K .
..
COUNiY
OF
ORAN6f
.r
• t . t . ··!
•' )
{
' . '
LUUi~lY ~"\:~1TJ\TICJ:1 JJl~d·i~JCT!) 01: OJ'.,\.':(iJ: CCJlJ:,lY
P • 0 • I~ o x 3 l Z 7 -lf);) -1 · i I : 1 l i !; , \ v e n u e
· F o u n t ~' i n Va t 1 e y , C a 1 i f o r n i a ~J 2 7 0 8
.CIIA~CE OIWEI{
C.O. !~O. s
~~~~~~~~~~~~ co:\'rRACTOI~: A.G. TllTOll co. I r, N.~f. SALIBA r.o, JOTNT VT:NfURE DATE Septc'mbcr 12, 1973
JOB:..:.scwcr Trunk "R" -Unit 8, Pacific Coast Hichwa)' Force Noin -Contract No. 5-19
Amount of this Ch~ngc o.r<lcr (ADD) (~x}k~kf{l(Rx $ __ 4.;....;.7 ....... 7.i-::5..::.1 ........ O__,O~-
~ In accorclanc~ with contract provisions, the following changes in the
contr:-ict and/or ccntract Hork arc hereby authorized and as c01:1pcnsation
therefor, the folJoHing additions to or deductions from the; contract price arc
hereby approvcJ. · . . ... . ·
References: · !n~pection Reports from March 22, 1973 to July 20, 1973
ADD:
For extra paving, sandblasting, a<ldltional traffic striping,
and barricading as requested by the Division of Highways and
the City of Ne\·:port Beach to better accommodate traffic flow
during the extended period of the contract. Contractor was
also required by d~rective of the Division of Highways that ~
all ~ork performed could not be started·before 7:00 P.M. and
had to be completed by 7:00 A.M.
For utility interference not delineated on plans and existing
force main t.ie-ins which were misaligned causing increased
labor and materials to accompljsh neces~ary interconn~ctlon.
For removal of.floor of old Newport Beach Glass.Factory,
concrete headwall and other interference at the "Arches" to
acco~modatc the gravity sewer.
Extra jacking pit required for tcchite sleeve lining in
existing gravity sewer .. Change in grade would not allow
insertion without a<ldltional jacking pit.
For additional T-lock manholes and rerouting of gravity
sewer to _avoLd utility interference at the "Arches."
Revise valve vault at Rocky Point ~ump Station and
encase 24 11 'VC pipe ~nder Flood Control Channel. .
ADD
ADD
ADD
.. ADD
TOTAL ADD
Original Contract Price
Prev. Au th. Changes
This Chan!!c (ADD )>,~XN~kiXXRJ
Amended Contract Price
Boa rd authorization <late.: Approved:
$
$
$
$
23, 741. 00
8,313.00 .
7;~78.00
1,423.00
6, 796. 00 ..
$47,751.00
678,500.00
64,082 • .SS
47,751.00
790,333.55
September 12, 1973 COlH-~TY SANITATimJ DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By~--~-----------~------~---------C on s ult 1 ng Engi.nccr
By----------------------------~---CoH tractor
Agenda Item #32(a) ..:.s-
By
--~~~~~~~--~~--c~l-11-c-,·-r....._.,t~n-r-,1-1-1-c·
District 5
cou:;ry S1\:1 rT,\T ro:~ u r ~>Tl: rcrs or: oi>.,\::cE cou::ry
P, o. l~ox 3127 -J.();q,i Elli~ ,\v<.'nuc
1: o u n ta in Va f 1 c y , Ca 1 i f o r n i a ~J 2 7 0 g
CllJ\~GE OIWER
C. 0. ;\Q. G
COi~TRACTOR: A.G. TUTOR CO.· fr. N.M. SJ\LH~A CO •. JOINT VENTURE DATE _S_c_p-t«-:n--1l.-)c_r_l_2_,_1_9_7_3 __ _
JOll: Sewer Trunk "R" -Unit 8, Pa·cific Coast llil!hw~y Force Main -Contr:ict No. 5-19
Amount of this Change Order. (ADD) (DEDUCT) s ___ o;;;;...::•:...;;.0.-..0 __
...,,,,, In accortlanc~ with contract provisions, the following changes in the
contra c t and I or cc n t r a c t "'or k arc he r c by author i z c d an <l a s co i:-i pc n sat ion
therefor, the folJowing ad<litions to or c.lc<luctions from the contract price are
hereby approvc<l. ~·. ·
EXTENSION or·coNTRACT TIME
The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of time due
to inclc1ncnt weather 12 calendar days
The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of time for
delay caused by the Gas Company's relocation of their 12"
HP gas main 30 talcndar days·
. -. .
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time ·
Original Completion Date
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date.
Hoard authorization date:
September 12, 1973
By _________ _,------~----
Coilsul.ting Eng1_necr
lly ________________________ ~~-----
C OJ l tractor
Agenda Item #32(b)
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION 42 calendar days
• August 24, 1972
330 calendar d4ys
July 20, 1973
372 calendar days
August 31, 1973.
.·
Original Contract Price $ 678,500.00
.Prev. Auth. Changes 1 2 3 4 $ 111, 833. SS , ' ' and 5
This Change (ADD) (DDDUCT) $ o.oo
Amended Contract Price $ 790,333.55
-T-
.Approved:
COUNTY SJ\NITATimJ DISTRICTS of
Oran~e County, California
By
--~--~~~~-----~---l~;1-1~1-c~-f-· -1-~1-1r,-,~i-n_c_c
District 5
RESOLUTION NO. 73-137-5
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 5-19 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT
NO. 5-19 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL
CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, A. G. Tutor Co.·, Inc. &
N. M. Saliba.Co .. , a Joint Venture, has completed the construction
in accordance with the terms of the contract for SEWER TRUNK "B" -
UNIT 8 -PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY FORCE MAIN, CONTRACT NO. 5-19, on
the 31st of August, 1973; and,
. Section 2. That by letter, Shuirman-Simpson, District's
engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been
completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That. the Chief Engineer of the District has con-
curred in said engineer's recommendation, which said.recommendation
is hereby received· and ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That Sewer Trunk "B" -Unit 8 -Pacific Coast
Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-19, is hereby accepted as completed
in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 24th
day of August, 1972; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby
authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with A. G. Tutor
Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Co., a Joint Venture, setting forth theterms
and conditions for acceptance of said Sewer Trunk "B" ·-Unit 8 -Pacific
Coast Highway Force Main, Contract 5-19,·is hereby approved; and,
Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of
Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement
on behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held S~ptember 12, 1973.
Agenda Item #3~ -U-District 5
~
I -
EXCERPT
1
2 City Hall, Anaheim, California -COUNCIL 'MINUTES -August 7, 1973, 1:30 P.M.
3 The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
4
5
6
71
8
9
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COll1-!CILHEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley; Thom and Dutton
COUNCILMEN: None
CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch
ASSISTANT. CITY ATTORNEY: Alan R. Watts
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Daoust
DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Alona M. Farrens
CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox
PERSONNEL DIRECTOR: Garry McRae
FIRE CHIEF: James Riley
·ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles· Roberts
The following is an Excerpt of said meeting as recorded iri the book marked
10 "Records of the Council, City of Anaheim'', on Page 73-648.
11 "ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT -SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER
(Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue): The Environmental Impac·t Report
12 1
prepared by Orange· County Sanitation District N.o. 2 in connection with
the Santa Ana River i~terceptor sewer, together with 2 supplements to
13 same, was submitted and reviewed by the City Council together with
analysis from the E.I.R. Review Committee.
14
15
16
17
Councilman Thom moved that the E.I.R. and the supplements
as submitted for the Santa Ana River interceptor sewer(Katella Avenue.
to La Palma Ave.nue) be a~opted as the Environmental Impact Statement
of the Council. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.11
18 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
.COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
19 CITY OF ANAHEIM )
20. I, DENE M. DAOUST, City Clerk of the City of Anah~im, do hereby
certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the minute
21 entry on record in this office.
22
23
24
25
26
·2?
28
29
30
31
32
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official seal of the City of Anaheim· this 17th day of August, 1973.
(SEAL)
DENE M. DAOUST, CITY CLERK
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
Agen a Item #44 -V-District 2
I
. I
Orig. Jws/
Copy· REL
Ma)'or
The People A.re The City
Councilm~n
. ROBERT P. LANGER ROBERT F. FINNELL
City Adminlslrnlor
EDWIN T. POWELL
120 South Bradford Avenue -Placemia, California 92670 -Telephone (714) 528-1146
August 23, 1973
Mr. Ray Lewis, Chief Engineer
Orange County Sanitation District No. 2
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Dear Mr. Lewis:
L. 1ACK GOMEZ
MICHAEL J. CALLAHAN
ROBERT B. LYONS
At the regular meeting of August 21, 1973, the Placentia
City Council adopted Resolution' 73-R-165 approving the·
route selections for Orange County Sanitation District
No. 2 1 s Master Plan Sewer Facilities located withln the
City of Placentia. A copy of this resolution is enclosed
· for your records.
When the minutes of this meeting are approved, a copy will
be forwarded to you.
/sib
Enclosure
Agenda Item #45 W-1
Very truly yours,
~/h~-
Edmund M. Ponce
City Clerk
District 2
-
RESOLUTION NO. 73-R-165
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY O~ PLACENTIA APPROVING THE
ROUTE SELECTIONS FOR ORANGE COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 1 5 MASTER PLAN
SEWER FACILITIES LOCATED WITHIN THE
CITY OF PLACENTIA
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF· PLACENTIA HEREBY RESOLVES:
WHEREAS the Orange County Sanitation District No. 2 is prooosing
to construct various master planned sewer facilities wi~hin City of Placentia
streets and highways, and
WHEREAS the City of Placentia has reviewed the prooose·d routes of
the ·orange County Sanitation District No. 2 1 s Master Planned Facilities
within the City of Placentia.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City of Placentia, in
accordance with Section 4759. l(c) of the California Health and Safety Code
approves the Orange County Sanitation District No. 2 1 s Master Planned Sewer
facility routes located within the Ci~y of Placentia.
ADOPTED BY THE PLACENTIA CITY COUNCIL ON August 21 , 1973.
SIGNED AND APPROVED ON . August 2·1 , 1973.
I -~fw.Lj;\~~
ATTEST:
CERTIFICATE OF CLERK
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution h'as dulY-'adooted
by the Placentia City Council at its regular meet in~ on August 21 ,
1973, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Finnell, Langer
COUNCILMEN: Gomez, Callahan, Lyons,
COUNCILMEN: None
COUNCILMEN: None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 21st
___ day of August , 1973. ·
~~1~
APPROVED:
Agenda Item 114 5 W-2 District 2
RESOLUTION NO. 73-138-2
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH
SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY
RE CONTRACT NO. 2-14-2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF AN AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS-
PORTATION COMPANY IN CONNECTION WITH
CONSTRUCTION OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER INTER-
CEPTOR FROM KATELLA AVENUE TO LA PALMA AVENUE,
CONTRACT NO. 2-14-2
* * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain agreement dated September 12, 1973,
wherein Southern Pacific Tr>ansportation Company grants to County
Sanitation District No. 2 the right to construct the Santa Ana River
Interceptor, From Katella Avenue· to La Palma Avenue, Contract
No. 2-14-2, through Southern Pacific Transportation Company right
. of way in the vicinity of the Santa Ana River south of Ball Road, is
hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That use of said right ·or way is at no cost to
the District; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District
are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1973.
Agenda Item #46 -X-District 2
RESOLUTION NO. 73-139-2
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
WITH CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY RE
SLATER-SEGERSTROM BRIDGE IN CONNEC-
TION WITH CONTRACT NO. 2-14-1
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO·. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
WITH CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY TO ACCOMODATE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE SLATER-SEGERSTROM BRIDGE
OVER THE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACT
NO. 2-14-1
* * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of .County Sanitation District No. 2,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain agreement dated
~~~~~~~~-
be t~een County Sanitation bistrict No. 2 and the City of Fountain
Valley to accommodate construction of the Slater-Segerstrom Bridge
over the District's Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No. 2-14-1,
in a form approved by the General Counsel, is hereby approved and
accepted; and,
Section 2. That the cost to the District in connection with
sa~d bridge construction shall not exceed $3,000.00, payment of
which is hereby authorized; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District
are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1973.
Agenda Item #47 -Y-District 2
l. U U i ~ ! )' ~), '\: l J 11\ 1 I () : ) I ) l ~ ;. I i ~ I <: T :) 01: () ! '"' \ .' ~ t i I: U J lJ : , J ·r
l'. O. Box 8127 -10~3·l 1 l Elli!_; ,\veuue
. Fount a l n Va 11 c y , Ca 1 i for n i a ~J 2 7 0 8
CIIA:-~Gn Olrni:lt·
C. 0. NO. 8
CO:n'IU\CTOI~: Sully-Miller Contrncting Corr1p:rny DATE SC]ptcml~cr 12, 1973
Santa Ana River Interceptor from lkclamation Plant No. I
.JOB: to Katella Avenue, Contract' No. 2-14-1
Amount of this Change Ordct. (ADD) Q;U:mouo:x~ $ 11,434.00
--~~~--~~~
...._,. In accorc.lancc with contr~ct provisions, the following changes in the
contra c t and I or cont r a c t work are h c re by author i z c c.l an cl a s co I:l pc n sat ion
therefor, the follmving a.<lditions to or c.lc<luctions from the contract price arc
hereby approved. · .
Reference: ·Contractor's letters to the District dated May 30, 1973, June 5, 1973
Add:
and June 6, 1973. District's letters to Cont~actor date<l June 12, 1973
and agreement between the Contractor ahd Southern Pacific Railroad dated
March S, 1973 and the Contractor's letter_ dated September 5, 1973.
For removal and relocation of the City .of Orange Water Main at Station
340+28 ind the additional support for the Metropolitan Water District
Water Main at Stations 338+59 and 338+95.
ADD
For removal and disposal of that portion of the old dump site over the
trench prism from St~tions 140+00± ~o 152+00*.
ADD
' TOTAL ADD
Deduct:
The Contractor's request for a change in method of construction, i.e.
3, 150. oo·--
14,934.00
$18 '684. 00
_ open cutting as opposed to tunneling, at the Sot1thern Pacific Railroad
crossing, Stations 235+25 to 235+75 is ·hereby granted. Items 17 &· 18
;
of the c_ontract wi 11 be paid in full, however, the District wi 11 realize
a savin_gs for this method.
: DEDUCT
The Contractor's request for a change of method of construction, i.e.
beam supporting rather than tunneling under the RCB from Stations
390+50 to 390+74 is hereby granted. Items 3~A 3~ of the contract
shall be -paid in full, liowever, the District will realize a savings
for th is method. .
DEDUCT
TOTAL DEDUCT.
Original Contract Price
Prcv. Auth .. Changes
3,250.00
4,000.00
$ 7,250.00
$ _ ____.6'-",_2 7..._4.-..a•--..6...;...0 8 __ ._4_0 -
$ _ __.l_...,_._4 4_6'--1,,_6_47_._5_6 _
This Change (ADD)fOONMtXlxx $ ___ 1_1~1 4_34_._o_o_
Board authorization date·:
September 5, 1973
By ____ ~------r--_,,_..-~-..---Cons ult i ng Engineer
.ny __________ ---:...---;--~-;:--:"'~
Contractor
Agenda Item #48(a)
Amended Contract Price s 7,732~689.96
-Z-
~~~~~~~~-
.Approved:
COlH-ffY SJ\NITATIO!J DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By ____ ~--~~~----~~.,-..-_,.~~-----C ln c-f Eng inc
District 2
cou;rrY :,J\:lIT,\Tlo:-: J>ISTi:ICTS OF (W,\::c;E cou::TY
P • 0 • Bo x [} 1 2.7 - 1 C · \ · l 1 i E 11 i ~ , \ v (' 11 u c
Fountain Valley, California ~J2'l08
CJ IA>1GE OIWi:R
C. 0. ~\O. 9 -COi·aru\CTOR: Sul ly-~H l ler Contr~1c.tinrr, Comff.11.lY_ DATJ~ September 12, l 973 ___ _
Santa Ana River Interceptor from l~cclamation Plont No. 1
JOB: to Kate I la Avenue'; Contract No. 2-14-1
Amount· of this Change 0-rde~ (ADD) ~lUJ'lNX'X~ $ 7,537.50
---~~~--~~---
~ . In accor<lanc~ with contract provisi.ons, the following changes in the
contra c t an <l /or c, · n ti~ a c t , ... o r k arc h c r c by author i z c d and a s co r:1 pc n sat ion
therefor, the following a<l<litions to or deductions.from the contract price arc
hereby approved. . ..
Reference: Addendum No. 3 -Schedule of Prices -Section ·.us of
Specifications
ADD:
The Contractor was directed to place one (1) additional foot
of rock from Station 160+23 to Station 181+44· and six (6)
additional inches from Station 181+44 to Station 197+20 because
of poor ground conditions.
.. 1, 005 cubic yards @ .$7. SO
•
7 ~ 5·37. so
TOTAL ADD . 7' 537. so ...
'
.·
~~~~~=-=-=..=-=-~·=============================================================================
Hoard authorization date:
September 12, 1973
lly ____ ~---------------r--~--.,..~-----Cons ult i ng Engineer
ny ______________________ _,.....~.=----:~
Contractor
Agenda Item.#48(b)
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
$ 6.274.608.40
$__LA.SS ,081.'"'""'5;..M.6 __
This Change (ADD) (X}fx~}J~'(lX) $ ___ 7 ....... ,5_3_7_.s_o __
Amended Contract Price $ --2.i 7'10 '227. 46
:..AA-
Approved:
COUNTY SJ\NITATIO!J DISTRICTS of
Orange County, Califo.rnia
By __ ~~-----~--~~~~~-----M----~ C11ic1 Enr, 1nc
District 2
C 0 U; n Y SA: JI TAT 1 0 :.: l) I ST I~ J CT~; 0 F 0 P.i \:: C E C 0 U:; TY
J> • • 0 • Bo x 8 L-~ 7 -1 0 H .1 1 l E 11 i ~; , \ v en u c
· F u·u n ta in Val l_c y, Ca 1 i r or n i a ~> 2 7 O 8
CllJ\>!GE OIWi~ R
C. 0. ~\O. 10 DATE _.....;.-.... _______ _
OlffRACTOR: ~~S~11~J~Jry~-~~l-il-l~c~r_....C~o~n~tr~a~c~t~i~n~g~C~o~m~p~o1~1}~'~~~~~--September 12, 1973
Santa An~ River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1
OB: __ ~----~~t~o:.._..4.lK~o~t~e~ll~~ . .!-!,A~v~c~n~u~c~.-C~o~n~t~1:·~n~c~t~N~o~.-2~-~l~4~--~l..__~~~~~----~~~~~~~~----~---
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) ·>!'\fXRx);{JA<;'(x~ $ _--.:2=..::s:....i.,...;:;.o.;:;..;o o~·:..;:o~o __
~ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the
ontrac t and/ or contract lvork arc hereby au th or i z e<l an<l as co1:1pcnsa t ion
hcrcfor, the following a<l<litions to or dc<luctions from tbe contract price arc
crcby approve<l. ... . ·
Reference: .
Contractor's letter dated Scp~ember 6, 1973
ADD:
The Contractor has been directed to provide·260-feet of 2600-D
strength pipe and encasement concrete in order to provide ~uit
able support for the proposed Slater-Segerstrom Bridge crossing
of the Santa Ana River, to be built by the City of Fountain
Valley in conjunction with the Orange Count~ Road Department.
Work is being done at a lump sum figure of $25,000. ·
.·
ADD
TOTt;.L ADD
'
.·
Original Contract Pric-c
P.rcv. Auth. Changes
$ 25,000.00
$ . 2 5 , 0 0 0 , 0 O·
$ 6, 27 4 , __ 6~0;:..;:8~.--4...._.0 __ _
$ _L, 4 6 s, 61_9_._0_6 _____ _
This Change (ADD) 6..QJx~<J;{xKY. $ ____ 2s._...-'-oo,;....;.o __ ._oo __ _
Bo al' d author i z at ion cl at e :
September 12, 1973
i)' _________ _
Consulting Engineer
Hy-----------~---:--t.011 tractor
Agenda Item #48(c)
Amended Con.tract Pr ic c $ 7,76~_27_._~_.6 __ ~~
' -BB-
.Approved:
· COUI<TY SJ\NITATIO!~ DISTRICTS of
Orannc County, California • (>
By----------~-..---_._..----C hi c· f L n f~ in e e r
Distric_t 2
. ....,,
Lfro: ~ .
~\.. .j. :r. r ~ ,...,.. .
.. .t__ l ... -~ ·-~~ ···· ·: ··. · incorporated 1888
orange civic center· 300 east chapman avenue· orange, califomia 92666
post office box 449
department of public works
engineering division
(714) 532-0444
August 27, 1973
County Sanitation District
County of Orange
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention: Mr. Ray Lewis
Chief Engineer
Regarding: Tract #8149
Dear Mr. Lewis:
It has been brought to our attention by Mr. Bruce Witcher of your office
that Tract #8149, which is presently developing within the City of Orange,
is proposed to be sewered by extending the just completed Santiago Canyon
Road Sewer into the Tract.
A problem is created according to·Mr. Witcher because the Santiago Canyon
Road Sewer is in District #7 and Tract 0 #8149 is in DistriGt #2.
We were, frankly, unaware of the difference in the two jurisdictions until
,·it was called to our attention, however when we submitted our plans to
your office for review, we showed this area draining into thf District #7
line.
Since physical terrain dictates for the most part how the land is sewered,
I don't believe that the area south of the Santiago Creek can be sewered
.from District #2 lines.
A gravity flow system would be difficult if not impossible and a force
main system may be required.
At the time we submitted our plans for your review of the Santiago Canyon
Road Sewer, we recognized this problem an·d showed the area in question
to be directed toward our new District #2 sewer.
.Agenda Item 1150 C9-l District 2
Mr. Ray Lewis
Page 2
"'-"" August 27, 1973
We received no adverse connnents from your office and assumed that our
Sewer Hydrology Study was acceptable.
If this land cannot be sewered as proposed it could only be serviced by
constructing a new line along the north side of the Santiago C_reek begin:-
ning at our existing sewer located at Sycamore and Serrano Avenue, a
distance· of approximately 2 miles.
In light of prob.lems in crossing the creek, I would suggest that this area
be deannexed from District #2 and included into District #7. It appears
that this should have been done when the Districts were originally establish-
ed.
If this ip unfeasible, I would appreciate further meeting with you to discuss
the problem since the tract was approved and is being constructed with the
intent of sewering into our Santiago Canyon Road Sewer.
We look forward to meeting with you at an early date to resolve this issue.
8 ry · . 1011 nSOI
Cit ngf/eer
GDJ:rh .
' . ·~
Agenda Item #50·
..
CC-2 District 2
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Fred A. Harper, Gener.al Mana·ger
Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
Santa Ana River Interceptor,-from Reclamation Plant No. 1
to Katella Avenue -Contract No. 2-14-1
Work continues to progress on two headings. The north heading has now
progressed to approximately 1,000-feet south of the end of the project
at Katella. The Contractor still expects to reach Katella by the middle
of the month. The River crossing and the wo.rk under the Atchison Topeka
and Santa Fe Railroad bridge presented no problems. Restoration and
landscaping of the levee section is progressing satisfactorily. The
Distr~ct has coordinated some of.the landscaping with the County Green
Belt Coordinator so that it fits into the overall plan for the River.
On the south heading, work progressed satisfactorily until the Contractor
reached Fifth Street. At this crossing a considerable amount of debris,
rip-rap ~nd an old bridge abutment were encountered. In order to expedite
the removal of this debris and concrete, the City of Santa Ana gave the
Contractor permission to close.Fifth Street for two weeks. It is expected
that two weeks will b~ more than enough to complete this cros5ing.
The Southern Pacific Railroad has granted the Contractor permission to
open ·cut the railroad tracks north of Fifth Street rather than tunnel
under them. The Contractor will give approximately a weeks notice to
the Railroad Company and Southern Pacific will then remove the tracks.
Upon completion of the north heading, that crew will start another
heading between Fifth Street and Seventeenth Street. This is necessary
at this time due to the Flood Control District's requirement that work
in this section of the levee be completed prior to October 15. 1973.
Work is expected to commence at Plant No.' 1 on approximately October 1,
1973.
REL:BEW:hjm
Agenda Item #51· -DD-District 2
G\ z
·.
--C~m;l e le
---To be CtJ /1 :3 ft·1.1c,/ed •
• I
•.
CITY OF SAI\JT A ANA
DEPARTrv1ENT OF PUUUC \VORKS
20 CIVIC (ENTER PLAZA • SANTA ANA • CALIFORNIA 92701
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P. 0. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester, Director of Finance
Dear Sir:
August 20, 1973
SUBJECT: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NUMBER 7 MAIN TRUNK FUND; CONSTRUCTION
· OF WEST RELIEF TRUNK REACHES 19, 20 Al~D 22, CONTRACT ~IBER
7-5-lR; BO-MAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY; STOP NOTICE
Reference your contract with Bo-Mar Construction Company for subject project,
it is requested that you withhold $958.86 fr9m his progress payments.
Bo-Mar owes the City for emergency repairs of streets, water mains, water
servi~es; water meter rentals and water used, all in connection with your
West Relief Trunk sewer~ Invoices and a.mounts are as follows:
INVOICE NUMBER
PW 3189
PW 3211
PW 3240
RP 0839
WT 2466
WT 2498
WT 2535
WT 2543
WT 2547
WT-2571
WT 2604
WT 2628
INVOICE DATE .
January 18, 1973
February 9, 1973
March 21, 1973
December 29, 1972
December 29, 1972
January 8, 1973
February 9, 1973
February 9, 1973
February 20, 1973
March 8, 1973
April 9, 1973
April 30, 1973
Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated.
INVOICE AMOUNT.
$78.17
$54.24
$95-58
$:0.61
$:· 5. 00
~15.50
$15.50
$172.50
$112.64
$14.oo
$15.50
$349.62
If you have any questions, please call Art Newcomb at 834-4180.
· ~cerly yours,
· r,_/:( ~v /(/;t~
Ronald E. wo1;6:d
Director of Public Work~
cc: Finance Depar~ment (Accounts Receivable Supervisor)
Agenda Item 1156. -EE-District 7
cou;rry S,\:lITATICJ:~. l>I~;Ti:Jcrs OF O!·~,\~:(~E c:ou::TY
p, o. I~ox ~n27 -l0~).1 1 l Elli!.J ,\v('nuc
Fount a in Va 11 c y , Ca 1 i.f or n i a ~> 2 7 0 8
CI IJ\~~GE OIWER
C. 0. ~\O. '.')
CO:~TRACTOR: no-~Inr Construction Cornp:m._._ _______ _ DJ\TE ----""------· Sept cmb c :i:_.Ll...i_!. __ ~)_7..._3 __ _
JOB: \•.1cst Relief Trunk Sewer, Re~chcs 19, 20 and 22 -Contract No. 7-5-lR
Amount· of. this Change Order. (ADD) ~'tl~IDG.l".~ $ 2,463.00 ----------
~ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the
contra c t an <.l I or cont tact work arc h c r ch y author i z c <l an <l as c 01:1 pc n s at ion
therefor, the following adtlitions to or deductions.from the contract.price arc
hereby approved. . ..
ADD
Item No. Unit From To Dif fercnce
3 L.F. 7,324 7,331 7
11 L.F. 24 35 11
12 L.F. 24 35 11
13 · L. F. 124 143 19.
14: L.F. 124 143 19
DEDUCT
Item No. Unit From To Difference
. 1 , L.F. 2,692 . 2, 672 20
2 L.F. 3,690 3,671 19
4 L.F. 2,696 2,678 18
22 C.Y. 10 0 10
Unit Price
$22.00
85.00
50.00
90.00
50.00
Unit Price
$26.00
24.00
20.00
50.00
•
TOTAL· ADD
TOTAL DEDUCT
$ 154. 00
935.00.
550. 00 .
1, 710. 00 .
950.00
$ 4 ,.299. 00
$ s20·.oo
456.00
360.00
500.00
$ 1,836.00
TOTAL ADD TIIIS CHANGE ORDER $ 2·,463.00
Board authorization elate:"
September 12, 1973
•
By ________ ,;___..,,..__.---n----~
Consulting Engineer
By------------:;or---:-~~-:-:: Contractor
Agenda Item #57(a)
.Original Contract Price $ 4 72, 680. 00
Prev. Auth. Changcstts l&l $ 18.18
~~~~~--~~
Thfs Change (ADD)}001rnki'x:XR) $ 2,463.00
Amended Contract Price S475,161.18
.-FF-
----
Approved:
COUI\TY SJ\NITATIO?~ DISTRICTS of
. Orange County, California
By _______________ .._r:----.--
C hi cT l:np, 1nc,
District'7
cou;ay SA:lITATio:.: nu;TJ~JCfS OF O!~,\::CE cou::TY
P •. O. Box Bl27 -lu~>-H Elli!; ,\vc·nuc
F .o u n ta in V .a 11 c y , Ca 1 i f o r n i a ~) 2 7 0 8
CllJ\~GE OIWER
C .. 0. NO. 4
COi\rfl~ACTOR: J.}_Q_:-M~r Construction Compan..__ ________ _ DATE -------·--Sept ember 12 , 1~}73
JOB: West Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 19, 20 and 22 -Contract No. 7-5-IR
Amount· of this Change Order X)\'001~ (DEDUCT) $ 18 ,500. 00
"-"" In accor<l;1nce with contract provisions, the following changes. in the
contract an<l/or ci>ntract Hork arc hereby authorized and as c01:ipcnsation
therefor, the fol lowing ad<li tions to or deductions .from the contract pric.c arc
J10rcby approved. .. .. .
A. For ·consideration, the District sl1all assume all liability
for subsequent compaction and reconsolidation as ~eedcd in
those areas described below in \vhich the contractor was
relieved of his contractual obligations to.obtain the
required compaction:
Station 48+00 to 62+30 (At S.F.R.R. t.o ~lcFadden)
Station 106+41 to 113+60 (S.A. F\.vy to 1st Street)
Station 115+00 .to 123+35 (between 1st & 4th Sts.)
Station 124+80 to 140+80 (between 4th & Fruit Sts.)
Station 140+55 to 163+08 (Fruit St. & Tustin Ave.)
Station 0+23 to 9+43 (West on Fruit Street)
In all other areas where the compaction requirc~ents were
obtained by the contractor, the District shall also assume .
all future obligations f<?r c~mpaction and· reconso~idation
rcqtiirements as needed.
T~is change order .shall not be construed· to relieve the
contractor of his performance bond and guarantee require-
ments regarding the underground sewer system,_ a~purten?nces
and other contr~ctual obligations.
DEDUCT
B. As provided for in Paragraph 7-6 of the General Pro'visions,
the contractor is assessed liquidated damages in the
mutually a~rced upon amount of $6, 000.. :
DEDUCT
TOTAL DEDUCT
•
Original Contract Price
Prev. Au th. Changes 1 2 3 , '
$ 12,so·o.oo
6,000.00
$~ 472 ,680. 00
$ __ 2_._4_81..-;.._1_8 ---
This Change >(XxlxtH (DEDUCT) $--1.§_,_5_00_._oc_J __ _
•
Board authorization date:
September 12, 1973
By-------~---r~-~~·~~ Consulting Engineer
~y------------------------~c~o~n~t~r~a~c~t~o~x~~
Agenda Item #57(b)
Amended Contract Price $ 456 J 661.18
· -GG-
Approved:
COUNTY SJ\NITATIO!J DISTRICTS of
. Orange County, California
By ____ ~--~------~--_,..._.....__,.~r-------Clu c· f Enr,1nc
District 7
cou;ay SA:lf'L\TlO>; IJI~;Ti:rcrs OF Ol'.1\.':GE c:ou::TY
P • 0 • I~ ox 8 1 2-7 -ll.1 '"; · l · l I: 11 i ~ , \ v e 11 u c
Fountain v.~~11.ey, Califonlia ~2708
Clli\~~GE OIWER
C. 0. !\O. s
DATE --.:.--------co;\'f RACTOR: Bo-Mar Construction Company September 12, 1973
JOB: \'!est Relief Trunk Sewer, Rea'ches 19, 20 and 22 -Contract No. 7-5-lR
Amount of this Change o·r<lcr. (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 0.00
~ In accord.-1ncc with contract provisions, the following changes in the
cont r a c t an <.l I or c : n t r a c t h' o r k a r c h c r c by author i ;: c <l an <l 3 s co 1:t pc n s a t i o i1
therefor, the folJ.oHing additions to or deductions from tho contrac.t price are
hereby approved. · ...
The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of time·.
due to inclement weather
For the consideration mutually agreed upon in Change Order
No. 4, Paragraph .B, the Contractor is he!cby granted an
extension of time
60 calendar days
84 calendar days
TOTAL TIME" EXTENSION 144 calendar <lays
SUMMARY .OF CONTRACT"TIME:
Original Contract Date
Otiginal Contract Time.
Original Completion Date
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
Board authorization date:
September 12, 1973
By _______ -:---~-..--"\"T---~~
Consulting E1q~ inc er
By----------~r-~---=-:~ Co11tractor
Agenda Item. #57 ( c)
September 28, 1972
180 Calendar Days
March 26, 1973
324 calendar days
August 17, 1973
Original Contract Price
Prev. Au th. Chanecs 1 ,2 ,3
$ 472,680.00
$ (16, 01s. a2)
This Cha nee (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 0.00
Amcrtded Contract Price $ 456,661.18
·-HH-
Approved:
COUNTY SJ\NITATIO?~ DISTRICTS of
. Orange County, California
By----------~-...,...-,...r----:--: Clnc-f tn~! inc
District 7
RESOLUTION NO. 73-141-7
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-5-lR AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT .NO. 7, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT
NO. 7-5-lR AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL
CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the. c~:mtractor, Bo-Mar Construction Company,
has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the
contract for the WEST RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, REACHES 19, 20 & 22,
CONTRACT NO. 7-5-lR, on the 17th da~ of August, 1973; and,
Section 2. That by letter, Boyle Engineering Corporation,
District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as
having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contra·ct; · and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has con-
curred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation
is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That the West Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 19, 20 &
22, Contract No. 7-5-lR, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance
with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 28th day of
September, 1972; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby
authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Bo-Mar
Construction Company setting forth the terms and conditions for
acceptance of said West Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 19, 20 & 22,
Contract No. 7-5-lR, is hereby approved; and,
Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of
Dire~tors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement
on behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1973.
Agenda Item #58 -II-District 7
. ··.·· '
COUNTY SANITATION DiSTRIC'T NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY
( SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT'S TRUNK SEWER. CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
~
~
<D PROJECT TOTAL ESTIMATED
PROJECT COST ~ p,
p,
H DIVERSION FACILITIES rt $39,000
(!)
3 TJSTIN -ORANGE TRUNK
~ r::::ACHES 10, 11 8. PORTION 12
\.J1
$1,253,000
\.0
I y
y
I
TiJSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK
:=:::ACHES PORTION 12 ,13,14,
15, !6 B PORT:ON 17 $ 1,062,000
"1'"JSTl~J-ORANGE TRUNK
REACH 18
SOJTH IRVINE LIFT STATION .
$347,000
$ !66:000
SCUTH !RViNE SUBTRUNK $
~C::~C.H 23 180,000
~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
TOTAL $ 3, 047, 000
~OTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST INCLUDES
· CO\lSTRUCTI ON, ENGINEERING, SURVEYING ,
:~:SPECTiON, ADMINISTRATIVE, LEGAL AND
~.~iSCELLANEOUS COSTS.
!"
{REMAINING 1969 MASTER PLAN FACILITIES)
1973 1974
!i, l I I I I DESIGN. I CONSTRUCTION I I
1 -----........ ---~.__-1 -! I
I
: PRELIMINARY
:
! I
j i I
! 1 ·
'j
I I I. I i
I I :
I
I
,,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
i
· l I
i"
i
PRELIMINARY EN.GIN ERING1----._
I
I
I
I
j
I· i :
I !
t I
l :
i I I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
j
I
I
!
i
i
. j
!
'
i ! f
\
i.
, I.
11
l
i
. I
I
I
1
I.
l
l
I
I
I
CONSTRUC ION r
j.
'. --IDESIGN~ •
DESIG
:
I i I
I ' ' I
I
!
.
I
;
I
1975
CONSTRUCTION
. CCON!TRUCTIONI '
CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTION ,,,.
I i
! ••.
i
''
BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP
,
197 6
J A
? . I.
I\ I 11" I t,... ...-
..
®
EJDLJ/e Enc;ineerina Corporation
412 South Lycn Street
P.O. Box 178
Santa Ana. California 92702
Mr. Fred A. Harper, Gener~ I Manager
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
. OF ORANGE COUNTY
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention Mr. Ray E. Lewis
Chief Engineer
Diversion Facilities
consultlnq ,C?nqtneers / architects
714 I 54 7-44 71
September 6, 1973
In response to Mr. Lewis's request, we submit the following.proposal for engineering ser-
vices to prepare plans and specificatio.ns and to provide construction staking for certain-
diversion facilities in the nori-herly part of the district.
The diversion facilities consist of four separate projects. Three of these projects will re-
lieve the Foothi II-Newport subtrunk in Foothi II Boulevard between Newport Avenue and
Arroyo Avenue and the Lemon ·Heights trunk in Southeast Skyline Avenue between Arroyo
Avenue and Red Hi 11 Avenue. Both of these sections are flowing at capacity. It was an-
. ticipated these conditions would occur and, therefore, paralleling relief facilities were
included in the master plan. However, as reported to the board at their adjourned July
31 meei'ing, ~ignificant savings can be realized if local .collection facilities are uf'ilized
in conjunction with new diversion facilities on Foothill Boulevard. These diversion fa-
cilities consist of approximately 400 feet of 8-inch sewer in Newport Avenue south of
Foothi 11 Bou fevard and f·he rcmode I ing of two manholes, insta If at ion of approximately 270
feet of 8-inch sewer in Newport Avenue south of La Loma Drive with ~anhole remodeling,
and insta.llation of approximately 120 feet of 8-inch sewer in Newport Avenue south of
La Colina Drive with manhole remodeling. Total estimated consfTuction cost of·diversion.
facilities "is $25,000. The estimated construction cost of paralleling relief facilities is
$63,000; thus, a $38,000 ~aving using the diversion facilities plan.
The remaining diversion project wi 11 temporarily relieve the Norf·h Trunk. It is. proposed
to consf-ruct approximately 445 feet of8-inch sewer in Fairhaven Avenue southerly of
Hewes Avenue and diverf· flows through the subtrunk S}'stem to the Lemon Heights trunk,
which at the present f'ime has excess capaciiy for several years. This new 8-inch sewer
Agenda Item #60 · KK-1 District 7
... -,
·Mr. Fred A. Harper -2-Sept.ember 6, 1973
con also serve as a local sewer to presently undeveloped properties which front along it.
As connections are mode, the usua I connection charge and front-footage charges wi II be
levied, enabling the district to eventually regain most of the estimated $8,000 construc-
tion cost. Total estimated construction cost of all four facilities is, therefore, $33,000.
. .
Our fee for preparing plans and specifications for a II the diversion faci1 ities wi 11 be a
lump-sum amount of $2,645. We propose that the field surveys required for plans and
specifications, as well as construction staking and as-built conditions, be performed on
a per diem basis at $57 per hour for a three-man survey crew, $41 per hour for a two-
man survey crew, and $22 an hour for a I icensed surveyor.
We are ready to proceed with the work upon receiving authorization.
BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION
{1-yi/c-eLtrJd.../u,ru-~9 /
Conrad Hohener, Jr., PE
Principal Civil Engineer
sk
Agenda Item #60 KK-2 District 7
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11
DISTRICT NO. 1
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 2
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 3
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 5
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 6
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 7
Directors present:
Dire·ctors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 11
Directors present:
Direct9rs absent:
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
September 12, 1973 ~ 7:30 p.m.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
ROLL CALL ·
Directors Robert Battin (Chairman
pro tern)~ John Garthe, Kerm Rima,
and Donald Saltarelli
None
Directors Robert Nevil (Chairman),
Dale Chaput, Ralph Clark, Norman
Culver, Robert Finnell, Thomas
Ko~alski, John Garthe, Edward Just,
Robert Root, Don Smith, Mark
Stephenson, and Donald Winn
None
Directors Donald Fox (Chairman),
Robert Battin, Thomas Blackman,
Norman Culver, Jesse Davis, Roland
Edwards, John Garthe, Jack Green,
Joseph Hyde, Frank Marshott; Henry
Roberts, Jr., Robert Root, George
Scott, Mark Stephenson, Charles
Stevens; Jr., and Cor Vanderwaal
None
Director~ Don Mcinnis (Chairman)
and Carl Kymla
Director Ronald Caspers
Directors Ellis Porter (Chairman),
Robert Battin, and John Store
None
Directors Don Smith (Chairman),
Ralph Clark, John Garthc, Ellis
Porter, .Don Mcinnis, and
Donald Saltarelli
Director E. Ray Quigley
Dire~tors Henry Duke (Chairman)
and Norma Gibbs
Director David Baker
9/12/73
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
Fred A. Harper, General Manager,
J. Wayne Sylvester, Se9retary,
Ray Lewis, Ted Dunn, William Ciarke,
Robert Webber, Rita Brown, and
Carol Fontenot
C. Arthur Nisson, Con Bliss, Conrad
Hohener, Harvey Hunt, Milo Keith,
James Maddox, Donald Martinson,
Garvin Shallenberger, Jack Guiso,
and Bob Casey
A regular meeting of the Boardri of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
was held at 7:30 p.m. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation,
the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for
each District's Board.
DISTRICT 1
Appointment of
Chairman pro tern
Chairman Patterson.
ALL DISTRICTS
Adopting Resolution
of Commendation for
retiring Director
Clifton C. Miller
* * * * * * * * *
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Director Battin be appointed
Chairman pro tern in the absence of
Joint Chairman Finnell read a letter
from Clifton C. Miller announcing
his retirement from the Boards and
expressing appreciation for the
association enjoyed with Directors
of the Joint Sanitation Districts
during his many years on the Boards. It was then moved,
seconded, and duly carried:
That said letter, dated September 7 '· 1973, be received and
ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution
No. 73-146, commending Clifton C. Miller for his outstanding
contribution to public service as a Diredtor. Certified copy
of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 The office of Chairman having been
Election of Chairman vacated by the resignation of ·
. Clifton C. Miller, the Secretary
declared nominations in order for the office of Chairman of
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7.
It was then moved and seconded that Directors Don Smith and
Donald Saltarelli be nominated as candidates for the office
of Chairman. There being no further nominations, the vote
was polled by the General Counsel who announced that Director
Smith had been elected Chairman. ~
. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular
meeting held August 8, 1973, be approved as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular
meeting held August 8, 1973, be &pproved as mailed.
-2-
9/12/73
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular
meeting held August 8, 1973, be approved as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minut~s of the regular
meeting held August 8, 1973, be approved as mail~d.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular
meeting held August 8, 1973, be approved as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular
meeting held August 8, 1973, be approved as mailed.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of minutes
That the minutes of the regular
meeting held August 8, 1973, be approved as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Appointment of Alternate
Commissioner to SCCWRP
Joint Chairman Finnell announced
that with the resignation of
Clifton C. Miller, the Districts'
post of alternate representative to
the Commission of the Southern California Coastal Water Research
Project, was now vacant. Following a brief discussion, it was
moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Director Henry Duke.be appointed as Alternate Commissioner
to the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project.
ALL DISTRICTS
Cons1deration of
Commissioner to SCCWRP
Following a brief discussion
concerning the propriety of the
Districts' Commissioner to the
Southern California Coastal Water
Research Project being a Director of the Joint Boards, it was
moved that the Districts' post of 'commissioner to the South~rn
California Coastal Water Research Project be declared vacant.
The motion failed for lack of a second.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of' the
Joint Chairman
The Joint Chairman re~orted that on
October 1st he and the General Manager
were scheduled to meet with EPA officials
John Quarles, Assistant Administrator,
and Robert Sansom, Deputy Assistant Administrator, regarding the
definition of best practicable waste treatment technology for
ocean dischargers presently being formulated by the Environmental
Protection· Agency. The meeting is a follow-up of the July
conferences of governmental representatives on municipal
discharges to the Pacific Ocean held in San Francisco and Hawaii.
The Chairman reported that officials f~om Hawaii, Alaska,
Washington, and California will attend the Washington, D. C.
meeting. Our staff has conducted extensive testing and is
preparing a report to support the Districts' positi"n suggesting
a definition that will protect the marine environment with a
reasonable expenditure of public funds and commitment of resources.
Joint Chairman Finnell then called a meeting of the Executive
Committee for 5:30 p.m., Tuesday, September 25, 1973, and
invited Directors Blackman and Kowalski to attend and participate
in the discussions.
-3-
9/12/73
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager· reported further
Report of the on the test work on physical-chemical
General Manager treatment which has been conducted
by the staff. Results indicate that
the Districts can meet the proposed Environmental Protection
Agency standards with the exception of the oxygen depletion (BOD)
requirement. If it is not possible to obtain an exemption for ~
ocean water dischargers on the BOD requirement, the.Districts
will concentrate their efforts on obtaining a realistic definition
of best practicable treatment technology for deep ocean water
dischargers.
Mr. Harper reported on the activities of the Alternate Fuel Source
Committee, a joint study with the County Road Department and
other interested agencies. The Committee is finalizing requests
for proposals for a feasibility study utilizing solid wastes and
sewage sludge as a fuel source to generate electricity.
The Manager reported that a recent legal opinion by Environmental
Protection Agency attorneys would apparently eliminate the
Districts from eligibility for up to $3 million in reimbursable
grant funds for projects constructed from 1966 through 1971.
The 1972 Water Pollution Control Act Amendments allocated
$1.9 billion for reimbursement; but as a result of the EPA
ruling, apparently only those states having construction programs
involving state financial assfstance such as New York, Pennsylvania,
and Michigan will be eligible. Our staff has been working with
Congressional representatives and with the State Board and will
continue to strive for a more favorable ruling.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the
General Counsel
The General Counsel reported on his
communications with the Bank of
America regarding their efforts to
unilaterally increase fees for
processing payment of maturing in~erest and bond coupons on
several of the various Districts'· outstanding general oblig&tion
bonds. He has informed the bank that the Districts could not
legally agree to such an increase.
With regard to the consolidation of District No. ~ into
District No. 3 presently under proceedings, Mr. Nissan advised
that recent adoption of Assembly Bill 2008 will apparently
restrict the tax rate that may be levied by the consolidated
District for the territory which is now District No. 4. A
clarification of the legislation will be necessary because
District 4's tax rate is approximately six cents less that that
of District 3. The General Counsel advised that he would keep
the Boards apprised of developments regarding the effect of
AB 2008 on the consolidation.
Following a general discussion of the Boards and the Counsel
regarding the date for which connection fees become effective
under the recently adopted connection fee ordinancef; of
Districts Nos. 2 and 3, Mr. Nissen advised that the language
of the respective ordinances states that fees are due upon
"issuance" of the building permit and that it would cause
considerable confusion and difficulty to change the provision.
-4-
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing attendance at
Water Pollution Control
Federation Conference in
Cleveland
9/12/73
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the General Manager be authorized
to designate one staff member to
attend the Water .Pollution.Control
Federation Conference in Cleveland,
Ohio, Septem~er 30 -October 5, 1973; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging,
and incidental expenses incurred for attendance at said conference
is hereby authorized.
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing payment to
Southern California Edison
Company re Job No. Pl-16
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That payment to Southern California
Edison Company for engineering design
in connection with installation of
66kv to a 12kv substation to serve 46 MGD Activated Sludge Plant
at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-16, be authorized, in an
amount not· to exceed $3, 500. 00.
ALL DISTRICTS
Awarding Printing of General
Provisions and Standard
Specifications, Specification
No. P-002'
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the bid tabulation and recommenda-
tion for Printing of General Provisions
and Standard Specifications, Specifica-
tion No. P-002, be received and ordered
·filed, and that the General Manager be authorized to issue a
purchase order to R. H. Landin Graphics in the amount of $5,255.48.
ALL DISTRICTS
Awarding purchase of
Bar Screen Chain,
Specification No. E-Obg
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the bid tabulation and recommenda-
tion for Bar Screen Chain, Specification
No. E-069, be received and ordered
filed, and that the General Manager be authorized to issue a
purchase order to Power Products Cocipany, agent for Moline Corp.,
in the amount of $7,460.00.
ALL DISTRICTS
Rejecting bids to Rebuild
NQ. 1 Engine at Plant No. 1,
Specification No. PW-031,
and ordering work done by
Districts' forces
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 73-130, to receive and
file bid tabulation and recommendation
to Rebuild No. 1 Engine at Plant No. 1,
Specification No. PW-031, rejecting a11-
bids, and. directing that said work be accomplished by utilization
of Districts' forces. Certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Authorizing purchase of
Replacement Expansion Joints,
Specification No. E-070
That the General Manager be authorized
to advertise and award purchase to the
lowest responsible"bidder for Three (3)
Replacement Expansion
tion No. E-070, in an
and freight.
ALL DISTRICTS
Convene in
executive session
Joints at Plant No. 1 Headworks, Specifica-
amount not to exceed $3,300.00, plus tax
At 8:04 p.m. the Boards convened
in executive session to consider
matters re litigation on Ocean
Outfall No. 2, Job No. J-10 .
. -5-
9/12/73
ALL DISTRICTS
Reconvene in regular
session
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing General Manager
to request proposal from
John Carollo Engineers for
preparation of project report
for 75 MGD advanced treatment
expansion at Plant No. 2
At 8:24 p.m. the Boards reconvened
in regular session.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the General Manager be authorized
to request a proposal from John Carollr
Engineers for preparation of a project~
report· for 75 MGD advanced treatment
expansion at Plant N~. 2, as required
by the State Water Resources Control
Board in connection with grant approval for 1973-74 fiscal year
projects, to be submitted to the Executive Committee for study
and recommendation to the Joint Boards.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of Special Committee
and authorizing engagement
of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell
& .Co. to conduct study on
Feasibility of EDP System
Dire-0tor Stevens, Chairman of the
Special Committee on Feasibility of
Electronic Data Processing Systems
reviewed the activities of his Committee,
the Committee recommends that
consideration-of electronic data
processing for the Districts be
divided into two phases. Chairman Stevens outlined the scope
of Phase I which would consist of an objective study and
recommendation by an independent consultant on the Districts' EDP
requirements. Phase II, if appropriate, would then consist of
design and implementation of the consultant's recommendations.
The Committee further recommended that the firm of Peat, Marwick,
Mitchell & Co. be engaged by the Joint Boards of Directors to
conduct the Phase I study and make recommendations on electronic
data processing for the Districts.
Following a discussion of the intent of the consultant's study
and the various alternatives to which the consultant would address
himself, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried:
. That the report and recommendation of the Special Committee on
Feasibility of Electronic Data Processing System, dated September 12,
1973, be received, ordered filed, and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the firm of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.,
Certified Public Accountants, be engaged to conduct a study and
make recommendations on the feasibility of electronic data
processing for the Districts, on a per diem fee basis for a
maximum amount riot to ex.ceed $10,300; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That Committee members Charles Stevens, Jr.,
Don Mcinnis, and Robert Root be commended for an outstanding job.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file letters
re underground utility
rights of way
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the following letters received
in response to communication of the
Joint Chairman regarding the
Districts' position on proposed legislation to give cities
discretion re underground utility rights of wa~ be received
and ordered filed:
From
Senator Dennis E. Carpenter
Assemblyman Kenneth Cory
City of Irvine
City of Yorba Linda
-6-
Dated
August 18, 1973
August 10, 1973
August 8, 1973
.-August 8, 1973
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file letter
from Orange County Water
Management Agency
9/12/73
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the letter from Orange County
Water Management Agency dated July 22,
1973, be received, ordered filed,
and referred to the Executive Committee for study and recommendation.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file staff
progress report on
Treatment Plant
Construction Projects
ALL DISTRICTS
Certification of the
General Manager received
and ordered filed
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff progress report dated
September 6, 1973, on Treatment Plant
Construction Projects be received and
ordered filed.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the· certification of the General
Manager that he has checked all bills
appearing on the agenda, found them
to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for pay~ent,
be received and ordered filed.-
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried
by roll call vote:
. . .
Approval of Joint Operating
and Capital Outlay Revolving
Fund warrant books That the Districts' Joint Operating
and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund
warrant books be approved for signature of the Chairman of
District No. 1, and that the County Auditor be authorized and
directed to pay: ·
Joint Operating $162,258.87
344,547.88 Capital Outlay Revolving
$506,806.75
in accordance with the warrants listed on pages "I-1" through
"I-3", attached hereto and made .a PC3:rt of these·minutes.
DISTRICTS 1 & 7
Approval Gf Suspense
Fund· warrants
Moved; seconded, and duly carried:
That the Districts' Suspense Fund
warrant book ·be approved for
signature of the Chairman of District No. 3, and that the County
Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $29.56, in accordance with
the war,rants listed on Page "III", attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 1
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned.
The Chairman then· declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:49 p.m.,
September 12, 1973.
DISTRICTS 2 & 3 Moved, seconded, aqd duly carried:
.Approving and authorizing
execution of Standard That the Boards of Directors adopt the
·Agreements with cities following resolutions approving and
authorizing execution of Standard
~ Agreements for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges with the
respective cities.
City
Anaheim
Orange
Villa Park
District 2
No. 73-142-2
No. 73-131-2
No. 73-132-2
District 3
No. 73-143-3
Certified copy of these resolutions are attached hereto and
made a part of these minutes.
-7-
9/12/73
DISTRICTS 2 & 3
Approving Supplement to
Standard Agreements
with cities
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors adopt
the ·following resolutions approving
Supplement to Standard Agreements
for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges with cities,
incorporating nhold harmless" provisions, as recommended by
the General Counsel.
District 2 District 3
Anaheim
Orange
Villa Parl{
No. 73-144-2
No. 73-133-2
No. 73-134-2
No. 73-145-3
Certified copy of these resolutions are attached hereto and
made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICTS 2 & 3
Authorizing modification
of Standard Agreements
to allow for collection
of sewer connection charges
by other than cities
The General Manager reported that
agreements had been approved by all
cities within the Districts with the
exception of three.· The Districtn
have been advised that the matter will
appear on the next Westminster City
Council agenda with a staff
recommendation for approval. The cities of Garden Grove and
Stanton have advised that they would prefer the Garden Grove
Sanitary District and the Stanton County Water District· to
collect the fees, respectively, in those cities. Following a
brief discussion of the alternatives, it was moved, seconded,
and duly carried:
That the staff be authorized to modify the Standard Agreement
for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges, in form approved
by the General Counsel, to allow for collection of said fees
by the Garden Grove Sanitary District and the Stanton County
Water District.
DISTRICT 3
Authorizing initiation of
roceedin s to annex territory
to the District Proposed
annexation No. 3D -
Uninhabited -Balsa Chica
Road Annexation to
County Sanitation District
No. 3
Moved, ~econded, and duly carried:
That .the Board of Directors adopt
.Standard Resolution No. 73-135-3,
authorizing initiation of proceedings
to annex approximately. 103.8 acres
of territory to the District in the
vicinity of the U. S. Naval Ammunition
Depot at Bolsa Chica Road and
Westminster Avenue (Proposed
Annexation No. 3D -Uninhabited -Balsa Chica Road Annexation
to County Sanitation District No. 3.) Certified copy of this
resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 3
Authorizing initiation of
proceedin~s to annex territor
to the District Proposed .
Annexation No. 3E -Inhabited -
Bol~a Chica Road Annexation to
County Sanitation District
No. 3
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 73-136-3, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex
approximately 53.6 acres of territory
to the ~istrict in the vicinity of th~
U. S. Naval Ammunition Depot at Balsa
Chica and Westminster Avenue
(Proposed Annexation No. 3E -Inhabited -Bolsa Chica Road
Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 3). Certified copy
of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
-8-
DISTRICT 3
Receive and file staff
progress reports re 3-17,
3-17-1, and 3-18
9/12/73
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the ~taff pro~ress reports
dated September 5, 1973, on construction
of the Knott Interceptor, C6ntract
No. 3-17; the Bolsa Relief Trunk Sewer and Bolsa Avenue Storm
Drain, Contract No. 3-17-1; and the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4,
Contract No. 3-19, be received and ordered filed.
DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
.Approval of Suspense
Fund warrants That the Districts' Suspense Fund
warrant book be approved for
signature of the Chairman of District No. 3, and that the
County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $317,054.61,
in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II-1", attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of warrants
That the District's Operating Fund.
and Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund warrant books be approved
for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be
auth.orized and directed to pay:
Operating Fund $ 25.06
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 31,598.46
$31,623.52
in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II-1", attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 3
Approving and authorizing
execution of Standard
Agreement with ·City of
Seal Beach
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 73-147-3, approving
and authorizing execution of Standard
Agreement for Collection of Sewer
Connection Charges
of this resolution
minutes.
with the City of Seal Beach. Certified copy
is attached hereto and made a part of these
DISTRICT 3
Approving Supplement to
Standard Agreement with
City of Seal Beach
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 73-148-3, approving
Supplement to Standard Agreement for
Collection of Sewer Connection Charges with the City of Seal
Beach. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto
and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICTS 2 & 3
Receive and file letter
from Garden Grove Sanitary
District re connection fees
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the letter from Garden Grove
Sanitary District dated September 11,
1973, declaring their intent to enter
into agreements with the respective Districts to collect
connection fees within the City of Garden Grove, be received
and ordered filed.
DISTRICT 3
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The
Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:53 p.m.,
September 12, 1973.
-9-
9/12/73
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approving Change Order
No. 5 to plans and That Change Order No. 5 to the.plans
specifications for and specifications for Sewer Trunk
Contract No. 5-19 "B" -Unit 8 -Pacific Coast Highway
Force Main, Contract No. 5-19,
authorizing an addition of $47,751.00 to the contract with
A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Co., a Joint Venture,
be approved. Copy of this Change Order is attached hereto ~
and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5
Approving Change Order
No. 6 to plans and
specifications· for
Contract No. 5-19
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 6 to the plans
and specifications for Sewer Trunk
"B" -Unit 8 -Pacific Coast Highway
Force Main, Contract No. 5-19,
granting an extension of time of 42 calendar days to the contract
with A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Co., a Joint Venture,
be approved. Copy of this Chahge.Order is attached hereto and
made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Accepting Contract
No. 5-19 as complete That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 73-137-5, accepting
Sewer Trunk "B" -Unit 8 -Pacific Coast Highway Force Main,
Contract No. 5-19, as ~omplete, authorizing execution of a
Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement.
Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made
a part of these minutes.
DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of Suspense
Fund warrants That the Districts' Suspense Fund
warrant book be approved for
signature of the Chairman of District No. 5, and that the
County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $56,574.00,
in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II-2",
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of warrants
That the District's Operating Fund
and Facilities Revolving Fund warrant books be approved for
signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be
authorized and directed to pay:
Operating Fund $ 297.50
Facilities Revolving Fund 165,480.39
$165,777.89
in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II-1", attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
· DISTRICri1 5
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m.,
September 12, 1973.
-10-
DISTRICT 6
Adjournment
9/12/73
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m.,
September 12, 1973.
DISTRICT 11
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and.duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting
so adjourned at 8:55 p.m., September 12, 1973.
DISTRICT 2
Receive and file
communication from
City of Anaheim re
Contract No. 2-14-2
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Minute Excerpt from the
City of Anaheim dated August 17, 1973,
approving District's Environmental
Impact Statement re Santa Ana River
· Interceptor Sewer, from
Contract No. 2-14-2, be
Katella Averiue to La Palma Avenue,
received and ordered filed.
DISTRICT 2
Receive and file
communication from
City of Placentia re
Master Plan Sewer
Facilities
the City of Placentia, be
DISTRICT 2
Authorizing execution of
agreement with Southern
Pacific Transportation Company
re Contract No. 2-14-2
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the communication and resolution
from the City of Placentia dated
Atlgust 23, 1973, approving route
selections for District's Master
Plan Sewer Facilities located within
received and ordered filed.
Moved, seconded~ and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 73-138-2, authorizing
execution of agreement· with Southern
Pacific Transportation Company for
crossing under Southern Pacific right of way south of Ball Road,
in connection with construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor,
from Xatella Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No·. 2-14-2.
Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made
a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2
Authorizing execution of
agreement with City of
Fountain Valley re
Following a brief report by the
General Counsel, it was moved,
seconded, and duly carried:
Slater-Segerstrom Bridge That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 73-139-2, authorizing
execution of agreement in· form approved by General Counsel,
with City of Fountain Valley to accommodate construction of
the Slater~Segerstrom Bridge over the District's Santa Ana
River Interceptor, Contract No. 2-14-1, at a cost not to
exceed $4,500; and rescinding Resolution No. 73-36-2.
Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto an~
made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2
Approving Change Order No. 8
to plans and specifications
for Contract No. 2-14-1
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 8 to the plans
and specifications for Santa Ana River
Interceptor from Reclamation Plant
No .. l.to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, authorizing an
addition of $11,434.oo, be approved. Copy of this Change Order
is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
~11-
9/12/73
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 9
to plans and specifications That Change Order No. 9 to the plans
for Contract No. 2-14-1 and specifications for Santa Ana
River Interceptor from Reclamation
Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, authorizing
an addition of $7,537.50 to the contract with Sully-Miller
Contracting Company, be approved. Copy of this Change Order
is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ~
DISTRICT 2
Approving Change Order No. 10
to plans and specifications
for Contract No. 2-14-1
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 10 to the plans
and specifications for Santa Ana
River Interceptor from Reclamation
Plant No. 1
an addition
Contracting
is attached
to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, authorizing
of $25,000.00 to the contract with Sully-Miller
Company, be approved. Copy of this Change Order
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Accepting Grant of Easement
from San Diego Pipeline Compan~ That the Board of Directors adopt
re Contract No. 2-14-2 Re~oltltion No. 73-140-2, authorizing
acceptance of Grant of Easement from
San .Diego Pipeline Company for a permanent easement in connection
with construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Katella
-Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-2, and approving
payment in the amount of $3,500 for said Easement. Certified
copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made.a part of
these minutes.
DISTRICT 2
Receive and file lett~r
from City of Orange
re Tract 8149 sewering
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the letter from the City of
Orange dated August 27, 1973, requesting
that Tract No. 8149 in District No. 2
be served through facilities located within District No. 7, be
rec~ived, ordered filed, and referred to the staff for study
and recommendation.
DISTRICT 2
Receive and file staff
progress report re
Contract No. 2-14-1
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff progress report dated
September 5, 1973, on construction
of the·santa Ana River Intercepto~ .
from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1,
be received and ordered filed.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of warrants
That the District's Accumulated
Capital Outlay Fund warrant book be approved for signature of
the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and
directed to pay $1,319,713.71, in accordance with the warrants
listed on page "II-1", attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes.
DISTRICT 2
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of .the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:00 p.m.,
September 12, 1973.
-12-
DISTRICT 7
Receive and file Stop
Notice from J. B. Crosby
Co., Inc. re Contract
No. 7-5-lR
9/12/73
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Stop Notice submitted by
J.B. Crosby Co., Inc. against Bomar
Construction Company, Contractor
for West Relief Trunk Sewer,
Reaches 19,
be received
20 & 22, Contract No. 7-5-lR, in the amount of $1,500.00
and· ordered filed.
DISTRICT 7
Receive and file letter
from City of Santa Ana
re Contract No. 7-5-lR
Bomar Construction Company,
Sewer, Reaches 19, 20 & 22,
and ordered filed.
DISTRICT 7
Approving Change Order No. 3
to plans and specifications
for Contract No. 7-5-lR
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the letter dated August 20, 1973,
from the City of Santa Ana regarding
unpaid obligations owed the City by
Contractor for West Relief Trunk
Contract No. 7-5-lR, be received
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 3 to the plans
and specifications for West Relief
Trunk Sewer, Reaches 19, 20, & 22,
Contract No. 7-5-lR, authorizing an addition of $2,463.00 to
the contract with Bomar Construction Company, be approved.
Copy of this Change Order is attached hereto and made a part
of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7
Approving Change Order No. 4
to·plans and specifications
for Contract No. 7-5 lR
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 4 to the plans
and specifications for the West
Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 19, 20,
& 22, Contract No. 7-5-lR, authorizing a deduction of $18,500.00
to the contract with Bomar Construction Company, be approved.
Copy of this Change Order is attached hereto and made a part of
these min~tes.
DISTRICT 7
Approving Change Order No. 5
to plans and specifications
for Contract No. 7-5-lR
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 5 to the plans
and specifications for the West
Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 19, 20 &
22, Contract No. 7-5-lR, granting a time extension of 144 calendar
days to the contract with Bomar Construction Company, be
. approved. Copy of this Change Order is attached hereto and made
a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Accepting Contract
No. 7-5-lR as complete That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 73-141-7, accepting
West Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 19, 20 & 22, Contract No. 7-5-lR,
as complete and authorizing execution.of a Notice of Completion
upon receipt of letters of permit compliance from the Cities of
Santa Ana and Tustin; and approving final Closeout Agreement.
Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
-13-
9/12/73
DISTRICT 7
Report on scheduling of
remaining Master Plan
facilities
The Chief Engineer reviewed for the
Board the remaining facilities to
be constructed to complete the
District's. Master Plan of Trunk
Sewers. A recent study of flows
in certain facilities has indicated that the Districts can best
utilize the existing trunk and subtrunk sewers by construction
of diversion facilities at several locations. Mr. Lewis also
recommended that the District proceed with preliminary engineering"-'
to establish the alignments of the remaining Master Plan facilities
and obtain concurrence of the cities in which construction will
take place in order that design of the sewers can proceed on
schedule.
DISTRICT 7
Accepting proposal of
Boyle Engineering Corp.
re Diversion Facilities,
Contracts 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2,
7-3B-l, and 7-3E-l
After the report of the Chief
Engineer on remaining Master Plan
Trunk Sewers, the Board entered
into a brief discussion regarding
the proposed diversion facilities.
It. was then moved, seconded, and
duly carried:
That the proposal of Boyle Engineering Corporation, dated
September 6, 1973, for engineerin·g services in connection with
preparation of plans and specifications for Diversion Facilities,
Cont~acts No.s 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, and 7-3E-l, be accepted;
and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be authorized to direct
.the engineers to proceed with said work for a basic fee of
$2,645.00; and,
That payment for work such as field survey for design and
construction sta~ing is pereby authorized to be made in accordance
with the following per diem rates contained in the proposal:
3-Man Survey Crew $57.00 per hour
2-Man Survey Crew 41.00 per hour
Licensed Surveyor 22.00 per hour
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Approval of warrants
That the District's Operating Fund
and Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund warrant books be approved for
. signature of the Chairman of· District No. 7, and that the ·
County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay:
Operating Fund $ 129.52
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 8,961.57
$9 '091. 09
in accordance with the warrants listed on page "III", attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of ~
Directors be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting
so adjourned at 9:08 p.m., September 12, 1973.
-14-
WARRANT NO.
21038
21039
2104J
f"'>1J41
~J42
21043
. 21044
"21045
'21046
;21047
• 21048
21049
2105J
21051
21052
21053
21054
21055
21056
21J57
21058
21059
21060
21061
21J62
21063
21064
21065
21066
21067
21068
21069
21070
21071
21072
21073
21074
21239
21075
21076
21077
21078
21079
21080
21081
>21082
·2l·J83
21084
t21085
21086
21087
21088
21089
21090
;91
~092
21093
21094
21095
21096
21097
21098
21099
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
AAA Fremont Bag & Salvage, Sand Bags $
Alex Fish Co., Ecological Research Supplies
All Bearing Service, Inc., Compressor Parts
American Compre·s sor, Compressor Pa rt s
City of Anaheim, Power
The Anchor Packing Company, Pump Packing
Armstrong Environmental Industries, Hardware
Bank of America, Bond & Coupon Collection
Beckman Instruments, Inc., Electronic Parts
Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams
Business & Institutional Furniture Co., Shelving
Cals Cameras, Inc., Photo Supplies
Cal State Seal Company, Gaskets
California Auto Collision, Inc., Truck Repair
John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services
College Lumber Company, Inc., Building Materials
Commercial & C.B. Communications, Communications Equipment
Consolidated Electrical Distr., Electrical Supplies
Constructors Supply Company, Tools & Hardware
Control Specialists, Inc., Regulator & Parts
Costa Mesa County Water District, Water
County of Orange, Maps
Mr. Crane, Crane Rental
Crest Leasing Corp., Leased Vehicles
Cylcone Excelsweld Company, Engine Repair
Daily Pilot, Employment Ad & Bid Notice P-002
Decker Instrument Supply Co., Controls
DeGuelle & Sons Glass Co., Glass
Nick DiBenedetto, Employee Mileage
Ducommun Metals & Supply Co., Steel
Eastman, Inc., ·office Supplies & Equipment
Ecomatics, Pump Parts
Electronic Business Machi~es, Office Supplies
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring (MO 12-14-66)
Engine & Compressor Supply Co., Parts
Ensign Products Company, Lube Oil·
Enterprise Printing Co., Printing
Robert F. Finnell, Sec .. Treatment Meeting (MO 6-13-73)
Fischer & Porter Company, Chlorinator Parts
Fisher Controls Company, Regulator Parts
Foss Company, Foam System
France Products Division, Engine Parts
Fredson, Equipment Parts ·
Larry Fricker Company, Inc., Weed Killer
Gar Wood-Los Angeles Truck Equip., Inc., Seals
Garden Grove Lumber & Cement, Building Materials
General Telephone Company ..
Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine & Odor Control
Graybar Electric Company, Electric Supplies
Hardware Systems Co., Lab Supplies
Harlows Clocks, Time Repair
Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting & COD Expenses
Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc., Pipe Supplies
Hertz Car Leasing Division, Leased Vehicles
Hewlett Packard, Lab Supplies
Honeywell, Inc., Metering Supplies & Strip Charts
Howard Supply Com9any, Pipe Supplie~
City of Huntington Beach, Water
Huntington Beach EquiDment Rentals, Equipment Rental
Imperial First Aid Supply Co., First Aid Supplies
Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware
Int'l. Business Machines Corp., Office Supplies
Johnston Pump Compnny, Pump Repair (MO 6-13-73)
I-1
AMOUNT
139.2:)
106.0J
235.68
762.67
15.0J
23.37
175.76
538.51
34.89
50.JO
81.47
61.14
92.61
491.62
636.10
193.18
97.2C)
1,029. 71
297.10
208.19
6.JO
44.34
l,448.4J
147.28
224.75
38.37
84.81
8.71
100.14
171.47
294.50
48.97
31.80
2,400.JO
6.25
244.81
17.81
77.0:)
623.38
886. l~O
21.20
127.20
8.99
111.30
16.18
544.84
2,2:03.53
5,351.92
31.80
242.85
47.99
159.88
158. 5:)
433.48
41.34
387 .65
1,337.24
34.65
357. 75
16.06
24.9.3
38 .16
7,211.92
WARRANT NO.
21100
21101
21102
21103
21104
21105
21106
21107
21108-
21109
21110
21111
21112
21113
21114
211.15
21116
21117
21118
21119
21120
21121
21122
21123
·21124
21125
21126
21127
21128
21129
21130
21131
211.32
21133
21134
21135
21136
21137
21138
21139
2114:)
2111n
2111-1-2
21143
21144
21145
21146
21147
21148
21149
21150
21151
21152
21153
21154
21155
21156
21157
21158
21159
21160
21161
21162
21163
21164
IN FAVOR OF
Kahl Scientific Instrument Corp., Ihstrmentation $
Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supplies
King Bearing, Inc.~ Seals
Kleen Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies
Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware
Kontes~of California, Lab Supplies
Kressilk Products, Inc., Conveyor Parts
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Hardware & Tools
L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Service
The Lacal Company, Inc., Cleaner
Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Equipment Parts
Judy Lee, Employee Mileage
Lewis Bros. Battery, Batteries
R. W. McClellan & Sons, Paving Materials
John McCullough, Employee Mileage
Larry McLemore, Employee Mileage
Marine Biological Consultants, Inc., Marine Ecology Study
Marshall Industries, Instruments ·
Metermaster, Inc., Metering Supplies
Morrison Company, Valves
Nakase Brothers, Gardening Supplies
National Chemsearch, Solvents & Cleaners
National Lumber & Supply Co., Building Materials
Nelson-Dunn Inc., Pump Parts
City of Newport Beach, Water ·
Newport Financial Corp., Hardware
C. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel Retainer
Noland Paper Company, Reproduction Paper
Oakite Products, Inc., Cleaner
The Ohmart Corp., Electrical Supplies
Orange Coast Hardwe>od & Lumber, Hardware
Orange County Chemical Co., Chemicals
Orange County Radiotelephone, Page Unit Rental
Orange County Stamp Co., Office Supplies & Rubber Stamp
Oreo Electronics, Electronic Supplies
Pacific Telephone ·
Ron Parker, Employee Mileage
Norman I. Parsons, Employee Mileage
M. C. Patten Co., Pipe Supplies
Pictorial Sciences, Inc., Aerial Photos
W. A. Plummer Mfg. Co., Operating Supplies
Porter Boiler Service, Inc., Boiler Parts
Postmaster, Postage
Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage
The Pryor Giggey-Co., Freight ·
Pyramid Fence Company, Fencing
Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal
The Register, Employment Ad
Richey Electronics) Inc~, Telemetering Supplies
Robbins & Myers, Freight
Robertshaw Controls Company, Controls & Freight
Jack H. Ross, Employee Mileage
San Bar, Ecological Research Supplies
Santa Ana Blueprint Co., Printing
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motors & Motor Parts
Santa Ana Electronics Company, Telemetering Supplie1
Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Lab Supplies
Scientific Products, Lab Supplies
s. F. Serrantino, Employee Mileage .
The Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Supplies
A. H. Shipkey, Inc., Truck Tires
Singer Business Machines, Postage Meter Rental
Smith Optical Service, Safety 3lasses
Snyder Manufacturing Co., Maintenanca Supplies
So. Cal Forming, Inc., Pump Repair
I-2
AMOUNT
583 .85
1,532.67
47.70
179.44
115.60 4.' .
1, 230 -~
914.21
1, 7:)9 .68~
22. 64.
200. 70,
26. 34~
129 .11
153.70
78.96
67.50
2,391.9:)
21.20
36.54
10.34
55.81
473.29
86.49
313.41
366.15
7.95
800.:)0
905.31
107.27
116.26
72.5:)
23.32
24.77
17.72
20.:)8
462.67
8.25
4.95
128.09
95.40
13.27
11.97
50:).00
54.18
29.2:)
767.63
40.0J
22.34~
85 .65
8.18,
595 .63
113.52
57.22
30.11
258.16
24.c::c::
156.'~
58.82
33.3:)
405. L~2
39. 29
6J. '~2
61~. 89
37.33
3'7 .10
WARRANT NO.
21165
21166
21167
21168
1 .169
~170
21171
~ 21172
, 21173
. 21174
~ 21175
21176
21177
. 21178
.211,79
21180
21181
21182
21183
21184
21185
21i86
21187
21188
21189
2119:>
21191
21192
21193
21194
21195
21196
21197
21198
21199
2120()
21201
21202
:212:>3
2120Jf
,21205
21206
21207
212:>8
212:>9
IN FAVOR OF
South Orange Supply, Piping Supplies $
Southern Calif. Coastal Water Research Project Authority,
73·74 Deposit per agreement
Southern Calif. Edison
Southern Calif. Gas Co.
Southern Calif. Water Co.
Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., ~ottled Water
Speed-E Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Stanco Mfg.· Company, Equipment Parts
Standard Oil Company, Gasoline & Diesel F~el
Stang Hydronics, Inc., Pump Parts
Sully Miller Contracting Company, Paving Materials
T & H Equipment.Company, Inc., Equipment Parts
Bruce .Taylor, Employee Mileage
Tell Steel, Inc., Steel
Tool & Hoist Division, Engine Parts
Triangle Steel & Supply, Steel
J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Blower
Harry L. Twining, Employee Mileage _
Twining Laboratories, Concrete Test Supplies
Union Oil Co., Gasoline
United Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Utilities Supply Co., Tools
Van Waters & Rogers, Flocculation Stuoy Supp. (M06-14-72)
John Waples R.S., Odor Consultant
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts
Western Fastener Company, Hardware & Pump Parts
World Travel Bureau, Inc., Various Mtg. Travel Expenses
Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage
Xerox Corp., Reproduction Service
George Yardley Assoc., Electric Supplies
Zodiac Paper Co., Reproduction Supplies
AMOUNT
188.72
73,350.:>o
28,723.:)8
1,301.31
3.2:)
100.JS
382.04
37.31
481.56
707.23
308.50
53.89
37.62
832.8:)
488.J.3
17.94
254.40
4.:>5
6:).0:)
1,128.46
685.65
136 .9·:>
2,073.28
264.a:>
. 4:>9. J5
628.12
324.54
57.18
963.26
58.82
6:). QL~
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING $ 162,258.87
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
John Carollo Engineers, Engineering-Plant Constr.
Daily Pilot, Bid Notices E~o69 & PW-031
E.T.I & Kordick, Contractor I-8-3
Engine & Compressor Supply Co., Test Equipment
Ficker Architects, Architect J-13
Mel Gorham Electric Co., Contractor P2-2:>
Hemisphere Constructors, Contractor P2-21
James E. Hoagland Co. & Hoagland Engr. Co., Contr. Pl-9-1
Franklin Miller, ~nc., Pipeline Delumper
68,705.77
22.56
25J 800. ·JJ
328.02
2,929.50
7,123.23
107,173.24
61,332.:>a
5,966.22
38,231.61
1,683.10
239.60
572.93
24,440.0:>
J. Ray Construction Co., Contractor J-13
Rutan & Tucker, J-lQ Trial Counsel
Twining Laboratories, Testing J-13, I-8-3 & P2-21
Wilmington Instrument Co., Instruments
F. T. Ziebarth & Ziebarth & Alper, Contractor J-4-1
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF
I-3
$ 3L~4, 54 7 . 88
$ 506,806.75
DISTRICT NO. 2
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
21210
21211
21212
21213
21214
21215
2r216
21217
21218
21219
21220
21221
21222
21223
21224
21225
21226
21227
Chino Basin MWD, Construction Grant Transfer
County of Orange, Compaction Test 2-14-1
Lowry and Associates, Engineering Service 2-15,
2-17, 2-18 & Construction Survey 2-14-1
Sully Miller Contracting Co., Contractor 2-14-1
Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Testing 2~14-1
DISTRICT NO. 3
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
The Register, Legal Notice Ordinance 304
·2-16
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY'FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Service 3-19, 3-20
& Construction Survey 3-17, 3-17-1, 3-18
County of Orange, Compaction Test 3-17-1
McGuire Construction, Contractor 3-17-1 .
Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Testing ·3-18
Twining Laboratories, Concrete Testing 3~17-1
DISTRICTS NO. 3 & 11
SUSPENSE FUND· WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Construction Survey 3-17
County of Orange, Compaction Test 3-17
Osborne Laboratories, Pipe Testing 3-17
J. F. Shea Co~, Inc., Contractor 3-17
Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Testing 3~17
DISTRICT NO. 5
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
City of Newport Beach, Connection Fee Collection
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
The Irvine Company, Bayside Drive R/A
II-1
'
$
$
AMOUNT
455,700.00
187.~8
21,875.78
838,798.~
3,152.0
1,319,713.71~
25.06
. 5,.993.50
17.01
24,509.95
988.00
90.00
31,598.46
.,
$ 31,623.52
$
$
216.00
128.61
450.00
314,856.00.
1,404.00·
317 ,054.61.
'-" 297.50
165, 4.So. 39
165 '77'7. 89
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6
SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. . IN FAVOR OF
21228 A. G. Tutor Co., Inc & N. M. Saliba Co., Contr 5-19
+r-2
$
AMOUNT
56,574.oo
WARRANT NO.
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
21229
21230
21231
2J232.
21233
21234
21235
21236
21237
21238
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services
Ervin Engineering, Refund Plan Check Fee Balance
Vista Park Homes #4 et.al., Refund Plan Check Fee Balance
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Bo-Mar Construction, Contractor 7-5-lR
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Service.7-5-lR and
Construction Survey 7-2D-7 · ·
County of Orange, Compaction Test 7-5-lR
Thomas A. O'Sullivan and Ellis W. Stanley, Reinbursement
Agreement
Twining Laboratories, Compaction Test 7-5-lR
Westclock Development, Refund Permit Fees
DISTRICTS NOS. 1 & 7
. .
SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Amack Dep~sition Service, Legal Services 7-6-1 Suit
. -III-
AMOUNT
$ 25.50
19.02
85. r ..._
.........,.
$ 129.52.
•
3,585.60
3,610.50
361.91
543.56
60.00
800.00
$ 8,961.57
$ 9,091.09
29.56
SEPTEMB ER 12 , 1973
JOINT MEE TING
(#4) Election of District 7 Chai rman -Finne l l r ead .le t ter from Clifton
Miller re resignation . Then Don Smith and Do nald Saltare l li were
nominated for Chairman . The Dir~ctors voted and Do n Smi~~ was
e l ected.
(#6) Reoort of Joj _nt Cha5rma n
F i nne ll called a meet i ng of t h e Executive Commi t tee for Sept. 25
and i nvited Directors Blackman an d Kowal s ki to atte n d .
He then stated the Board needed to select an Alternate Commissione r
t o SCCWRP to replace Cl ifton Miller . A question was asked regarding
t hei r meetings and was answered they were h eld in Los Angeles dur i n g
the daytime . Jesse Davis was nomi n ated b u t d ecline d t he nomination
b e cause of hi s busy schedule. It was the n move d t h at Henry Duke be
n o minated and the motion was seconded ..
Hy de then stated that he thought it was t i me the Board re t urned to
p r oper protocol and that the d elegate to SCC WRP als o be nomi n a t ed
f r om this body . The question was called for and t he motion carried .
Hyde r epeated was he just sai d about a dele gate to SCC WRP and t h en
moved that the de l e gat e 's position be de c l a red vac ant . No s ec o nd
to the motion -motion died.
Finnell reiterat e d f or the new Directors that Li n d sley Pars ons
has b e en the dele g ate since the i nce ption of SCCWR P . Wh en h e did
not run for re -e l ection on Newport Beach Cit y Co u n cil, he lo st h i s
Di rectorship on the Board but it wa s t h e op i nion of the Dis t ric t s
that h e shoul d remain on as our repre sentati ve to S CCWRP .
Finne l l then reported on meeting i n Wa s h ingt on ,D .C ., Oc tober 1st
with EPA As sistant Administra t o r Joh n Qu arle s a n d De p u t y Ass i s tant
Admini strator Robert Sansome r e best p r a c t icab l e waste t reat ment
t e chno l ogy and seco ndary treat me n t r e qui reme n ts for ocean dis -
charge rs . This i s a follow-u p mee ting to the one he l d in San
Francisco in July . Representative s f rom Hawa ii, Alaska , Wa s h ingt on
& Califo rnia will attend . Said t h a t th e staff h ere h a s b e en
conducting some v e r y d e t a i_ed tests and the r es u l t s have bee n
g ive n to Harvey Hunt t o come u p wi th a de finiti on of be s t prac tic ab l e
wast e treat ment tech n o lo g y . Anythin g th at i sn 't s tarted by July 1 s t
_1 974 , rather th a n co ming under s e c ondary tre a t me nt , wi ll come in
under "best pra cticab l e treatme nt ". I t i s the con sens us o f op ini o n
o f ocean disc har g ers o n P ac i fi c Coast that i t p e rh a ps might be t he
way to come in mos t e c o n omica lly . I t i s h ope d that we -c an meet wi t h
Stit e Board once we ge t s u g gestions from JC E to review them . We may
not me et the Califo rni a s t acdar ds so we wi ll h a ve t6 meet t h e Ca l i f.
ocean requirem ents a nd o u r P lan h as already b een a pp r o ved by t h e
St a t e a s me et ing them . Ho p e to e n c ourage the p art i cipat i o n o f th e
SWRCB s o th a t we c o uld h ave a rep r es e n t a tive from th e State o f Ca l if .
Whil e attemp ting to c h a n ge the d e fini ti o n , we are go i n g o n with
proje c t a t Pla n t 1 . Are pro b a bly the onl y Dist r i ct in Califo r n i a
who h a v e a d e fini t e pla n and wh o h a v e r e c e i ved a l l th e necess a ry
ap pro v al s that can b e r e c e ived at this part ic u l ar time , a n d at t he
same t ime we are atte mptin g to ge t the de finiti on p u t i n a ma nne r
th a t wi ll achieve t h e _obj e ct i v es of a ll o f us in a more e conom i cal
wa y.
(#7) Re port of Ge n e r a l Mana ge r
Mr . Harp e r r e port e d fur t h e r on wh at F i nn e ll was j ust dis cuss ing .
Sai d co n cerning work t h a t has b ee n conduct e d h e r e on phy s i cal -ch e mi cal
tre atme n t , f o u nd t hat i t i n crease d c o st s of our c h emi c a l s of mayb e
$1 2 mi l l i on to a pproach sta n dards that h a v e b e en es t a b lis hed by SWRCB .
It do es n ot t a k e c a re of BOD r e moval . Thi s i s th e area that we wi ll
try t o do somet h i n g a bou t .
(#7) Reported on the Alternate Fuel Source Committee. Board authorized
th e staff to wo r k with County Roa d Department and sanitary land fill
disposal people to try to develop the recycling or reuse of the solid
wastes as a fuel source .. Commi'ttee has been war.King tor months and
next Friday will be fina l izing request for proposals form that will
be submitted this month or early next month to the County Supervisors .
Prop osal request ? will be for a feasibility s tudy of this area .
Quite a few agencies throughout the U.S. have a means for disposing
of or discarding wastes and as an ene rgy source .
Also reported that some time ago after Water Quality Bill was passed,
he had reported that our agency was in line for several million
dollars where we did not receive any federal grants. After that,
attorneys for EPA defined those eligible were those that were in
states that had s ome kind of participating program, and Ca lifornia
did not have participating program unt il last two or three years .
Have · been working with Congressman Hinshaw along with State Board
and they are attempting to get a change in that Bi ll so we may get
some $1. 9 billion. Right now New York, Pennsylvania, & Mich igan
are going to get most of the money. Have to app ly to EPA by Oct. 1st
if we want to get this.
(#8) Report o f General Counsel
Regarding Standard Agreements with cities in Districts 2 & 3 ,
Cities will be and are receiving a rush of building permit
applications to meet the Oc tober 1st deadline. One of the
questions th at is going t o come u p is if they have to apply before
October 1st or if the permit has to be issued. It was then
clarified that the date issued wi ll be date to go by , as it is
stated in the ordinance .
Also reported on problem l as t month with Bank o f America who buys
our bonds in mo s t of the Districts, except 1 & 7, In June they
star.ted communications with Treasurer indicating they wanted to
increase their fees . Treasurer didn't feel they would be able to
and contract was binding. Turned it over to Nisson and he did not
agree to change in fees . Had a binding written contract that was
entered into in 1 952 and was no pro visio n for escalation in their
fees. Is a constitutional provision that would prevent Districts
from doing it even if they wanted to. Said they indicated that
they would let it .rest for the moment.
Nisson stated he did a little work in District 7 ~~garding the
suit of Sully-Mi ller.
Al so advised that a new problem had surfaced r egarding conso lidation
of Districts 3 and 4 because of Assembly Bi ll 2 008 involving the
maximum tax rate that may be levied by the consolidated Di s trict.
District 3's is 47.3¢ and District 4 's is 41¢. Have been trying
to work this problem so that when a nd if the consolidation does
take plac e , Distric t 4 will be paying the same tax rate which was
the intent of th e a g reement and would have been done if this new
l egislation had not been passed .
Nevil then asked if it would be possible for the Boards of Districts 2
and 3 to take a ction to stipulate that any fil i n g for building
p e rmit s pri o r to Octob e r 1 s t would c o n s titute t h e building no t
subj ect t o t h e fee. Hate t o see the cities b e p ut in a pos i t ion of
b a d publi c r e l at i on s jus t b e c a u se they d o n 't pro c ess t h e p e rmit
fa s t e n ough . Th e n i t is city 's f a ul t th a t the s ubdivide r is out of
a lot of mon e y .
Smith ans we r e d th a t t h is wa s di s cuss ed quit e a bit a t Commi t t ee
l e v e l a nd i t was f e l t t h a t the r e h as t o be a b r eaking p o int somewh e r e .
Ne vil as k e d if th e Co mm i t tee 's discuss ion was f o r t h e i ss u a n ce or
the f i ling date a nd Smi th said i t wa s the i ss u a n c e o f th e pe r mit .
-2-
(#8) Just commented that their Building Department was receiving
applications from some without plans and specifications. Would
be defeating the purpose if changed date and would deluge staff
with ap~lications.
Fox said they don't issue permits until these things are all
approved. Said he went along with Nevil on his theory.
Nisson stated that · the language of the ordinance reads "issued"
Is hard to say that "applied for" means "issued".
Smith also stated that that was why they set the date up so far
so they would have time.
Vanderwaal said that all fees are paid on issuance of building
permit in his city.
Winn wanted to make a motion to find out about changing this date
but Finnell said that the wording was definite in ordinance and
procedure re issuing the permits was definitely set.
EXECUTIVE SESSION 8:04 -8:24
(#16) Report of EDP Committee
Stevens thanked committee .and JWS & FAH for all their work. Said
we had the best people in Orange County •.. (I agree) Read report.
It was the Committee's recommendation that the firm of Peat, Marwick
& Mitchell be engag~d by the Joint Boards of _Directors to conduct
study and make recommendation on feasiblity of electronic data
processing for the Districts. $10,300. maximum and 43 man days.
Batt.in asked whether the Committee could consider the possibility
of going in with the County and Stevens answered that it will
one of the considerations of this organization.
Ralph Clark stated that we could save $10,000 if we forget the
study and use the County's study, and use private enterprise to
handle this rather than governmental department. There are other
governmental entites that are going to plug into this and think
we are wasting money on this study.
Stevens answered that one of the biggest mistakes ls not enough
preparation before getting involved in the work. May save $10,000
now but ·until someone actually studies the needs for this particular .
District, may cost you $150,000 later. San Diego was a good example
of this.
Hyde asked just what items would be considered. Stevens said it
would be to study the needs of our accounting department--long range
plans; whether or not we need to get involved in EL'P now or two
years from now or when and what kind of service we should get
involved with; whether we should do anything; would take input
at this level and determine what should be done with it in order
to operate at most efficient level in 5 or 10 years.
It was then moved to approve the recommendations of the Committee.
Motion was seconded .
There was a little more discussion re going with the County and
Root pointed out that it wa~ a little premature to decide that yet.
Have to cross some of these bridges to even determine what the needs
are here. Said he thought this · organization should take advantage
of that information and that it may well be the implementation that
is required. We aren't even sure that we should have EDP here
and if we do, what we need. Think these considerations have to
be answered someplace along the line by somebody.
-3-
(#16) Stevens commented further that this was brought up by Committee
as a potential solution if we get down to whether we need a
system. Tried to get someone who is totA.lly obj~ctive.
(?) Said he would like to speak to the motion. Have been in
computers for some time. Certain things you don't do any other way .
Would be nice to! see one of the study groups come in and say you
shouldn't do something but usually doesn't happen.
Called for the question. Motion carried.
Porter moved that the Committee be commended for their work ..
Motion seconded. Applause.
(#25c) Standard Agreements
FAH reported that we have been very successful in getting
agreements signed by various cities. Those not signed are
Westminster, Garden Grove and Stanton. Have been advised by
Westminster that City will approve agreement. City of Garden
Grove would prefer that Garden Grove Sanitary District would
collect the fees rather than the City. FAR recommended that
the Board approve that. The City of Stanton would like the fees
to be collected by the Stanton County Water District rather than
the City and we would recommend that this be done . May be some
areas not covered by Stanton County Water District and then we
would have to collect ·those fees here. Feel that this would be
the best way to handle it.
It was then moved and seconded that Districts 2 & 3 be authorized
to modify their agreements so that Garden Grove Sanitary District
and Stanton County Water District may collect payment of fees .
Motion carried .
(#47) Agreement W/City of Fountain Valley re 2-14 -1
Nisson reported that it would cost an additional $25,000 ·in
construction . Total amount of extra strength pipe we have to
have is 261 feet and agreed that extra costs of this construction
will be equal to 1/18 of the total cost which is the figure of
$4 ,500. The costs may vary but the figure of 1/18 will be fixed .
(#59) Report on scheduling of Master Plan facilities
REL reported that staff was instructed to meet with consulting
engi neers and bring up to date all Master Plan construction.
Referred to map and pointed out various trunks that were overloaded
or were to be changed . Said recently the Districts' staff has
taken measurements of the sewer flows in the area and have found
that we can better handle the flows by a few short connections or
diversions . Will be able to eliminate one of the relief sewers
in Master Plan report. Said we should proceed at this time in
preliminary engineering for the trunk sewer and complete them
perhaps 9 months ahead of schedule . It would be the staff's
recommendation to proceed with preliminary engineering to establish
the a l ignments and get the concurrence of the cities involved so
we can proceed with the design of the sewers for the balance of
the Master Plan facilities.
(#60) REL reported further on sewer capacities and what could be done
by di version facilities. Sql tarelli asked if we :. were buying
enough time by putting in additional diversion facil!ties or would
we buy more time by putting in paralleling. Ray answered that the
only paralleling could be a small reach which he pointed out to
the Directors that would be eliminated here. Didn't feel that
Tustin 's relief would buy that much.
-4-
(#60) Ralph Clark asked if this plan was taking into consideration the
critical areas primarily or overall.
Ray answered that basically to be~in with plan to start the
preliminary engineering to complete the Master Plan sewers as
outlined in the ~eport . of 1969 . Have sufficient capacities up
to Mitchel.,1. and Red Hill. This is to continue with that system
up to the northerly part of District 7. Said they were recom-
mending that we start preliminary engineering ahead of time
schedule in Master Plan report because of the investigation that
should be done by engineers. Saltarelli then asked if it wo~ld be
necessary to put more capacity on Red Hill north of Mitchel l and
REL answered yes , a l l the way up .
-5-