Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973-09-12COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID .OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) September 6, 1973 \ TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 Gentlemen: TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, will be held: WEDNESDAY EVENING, SEPTEMBER·12; 1973 AT 7: 30 p IM I . 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA Tentative adjournment prior to next regular meeting: Executive Committee -5:30 p.m., September 25, 1973 ---------·--------- MANA GER 'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box B 127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain V a ll ey, Calif., 92708 Tel ephones: of Orange County, Califo.rnia JOINT BOARDS REGULAR MEETING Wed nesday , September 12, 1973 7 :30 p .m. Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962-24 11 The following is a brief explanation of the more important non -ro utin e items which appear on the enc l osed agenda and which are not o therwise se lf-explanatory. Warrant lists a r e not attached to the agenda sinc e they are made up imm ediately preceding the meeting but will appear in the supplemental agenda available at the meetin g . The Execut ive Committee did not meet dur ing the month of August. · Di st rict No. 7 No. 4 -El e cti on of Chairman . Chairman Clifton Mil l er has ac c epted a prominent pos ition with the Universi·ty of Houston , Texas , and has submitted hi s r esignat i on to the Tustin City . Cow1cil effec tive August 31st . Therefore , it will be neces~ary for t h e Board t o e l ect a new Chairman . J o in t Boa r ds No . ·9 Consent Calendar . The fo llowing agenda items fall into thi s category in accordance with the definition established by the Boards : . (a ) Att end an c e a t National Mee tin g of Wat e r Po llution Contro l Federation in Cl eve l and . It i s r ecommended that t he General Manager b e .authoriz e d to send on e staff member· to t he annual me eting of this organization which represents al l aspects of the waste treatment and water poll ution control fi e l ds in this country and several foreign countries . We h ave been active in thi s organi zation and their conferences and exhibits have p r oved to be ext r emely valuable to the Di s tric ts . (b) Authorizing Payment to Southern Ca l ifornia Edison Company for Engineering Design . The design engineers for the 46 mgd activated sludge plant have been in contact with the Edison Co mpany concerning the power require - ments necessary to operate the planned secondary treatment facility at Plant No . 1 . They have been advised by the Edison Company that to meet the construction schedule of th~ Dist ricts, it will be necessary for the company to begin engineering design in connection with the instal- lation of a 66 KV to a 12 KV substation on the Districts ' property immediately . The company requires that the Districts agree to cover their engineering costs up to a maximum of $3,500 in the event the project is sub - sequently abandoned . ( c) and ( d) Awarding Purchase Orders for Advertised Work and Materials, Specification Nos . P-002 and E-069 . (e) (f) It is recommended that Purchase Orders f or requir e d mate r ials described in the agenda for Specification Nos . P ~002 and E-069 be awarded to the named lowest responsible bidder?. Rebuild No . 1 Engj_ne at Plant No . 1, Specification No . PW -031. On September 5th, the Districts opened competitive bids to r e build this engine . The b ids were co n - siderably higher than the staff estimates the work can be accomplished for . Attached to the agenda supporting material is the staff's memorandum r ecommending that all bids be rej e cted and that the work .be pe r formed using District force s. This appears to be in the best interest of the Districts because of a possible saving o f over $6 ,ooo . Authori zing the General Manager to Advertise fo r Acquisition of Three Rep l acement Ex pansion J oints . It is recomme nded that the action appearing on the cons e nt calendar (f) be authorized to acquire t hre e replac e me nt piping expansion joints for the Plant No . 1 Headworks, in an amount not to exceed $3,300 plus tax and freight . -2 - No . 11 -Report on Litigation, Job No . J-10 . On February 14, 1973, the Boards authorized employment of Garvin F . Shallenberger, of Rutan. and Tucker, to represent the Districts concerning litigation resulting from the con - struction of Ocean Outfall No . 2 by Peter Kiewit Sons ' Company . Mr . Shallenberger will report on the case developments to date and answer questions from the Board members . No . 13 -Requesting Proposal fo~ Project Report for 75 mgd Advanced Treatment . The Districts have just received notification from the State ·water Resources Control Board to proceed with the prepara- tion of a Project Report for the fisca l year 1 973-74 Clean Wa t er Construction Grants. Our agency has a project to expand Plant . No . 2 facilities, including provisions for 75 mgd advanced waste treatment . Before any proposed construction of treatment faciliti es can be considered for State and Fede ral grant assistance, a detailed Project Report must be filed with the .state . This report does not involve the design of the project, but rather the evaluation of various treatment methods and a se l ection of the processes to be utilized . The letter, whic h is enclosed in the agenda material . specifies that if this project is to r e main on the 1973-74 priority list and receive cons~deration for funding, the Project Report .with all support - ing documents must be submitted by. March 1, 1 974 . Since muc h of the information which is required for the Project Report is being compiled by the Districts' ·treatment plant engineers in a Master Pl an Report, i t is the staff 's recommendation that a proposal be ·solicited from them to prepare the Project Report for review and recommendation by the Exec utive Committee at the Octobe r Joint Board meeting . No .. 15 -Communication from Orange County Water Manage - ment Agency . We have received a communication from the Orange County Water Management Agency suggesting that the Sanitation District s consider possible memb ership in the agency . It is recommended that the matter be referred to the Executive Committee for study and r ecomm e ndation . No . 16 -Report of Special Committee on Feasibility of El ectronic Data Pr ocessing . The Committee will report its r ecomme ndation on the selection of a qualified firm to conduct a study o f the needs of the Districts concerning the es tablis hment of an electronic data processing system . As reported earlier, the Comnittee has met on several occasions and is currently revi ewin g pro- posals from six firms . Chairman Stevens wi ll present the Committee's recommendation to the· JoiDt Boa r ds on Septembe r 12th . -3- Dist ricts Nos . 2 and 3 No . 25 -Approving Standard Agreements for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges, and Staff Progress Report . I ncluded with the agenda material is a progress report conce r ning the number of cities which have approved standard a g r eements for collection· of the newly -adopted District sewer connection charges . The staff desires directio·n from the Boards as to what alternative steps can be taken in the event any of the remaini ng unsigned cities choose not to enter into the agreements providing for the collection of the Districts '. c onnection charges . Di str ict No . 3 No . 26 -Resolutions Authorizing Annexation Proceedings t o Annex Approximately 155 Acres to the District . On August 9 , 1 972, the Board approved, in principle, the annexation of this territory to the District and established a n annexation fee of $97,561 .17 . The two resolutions appear - ing in the agenda authorize the initiation of annexation proc ee dings for the property . It is the staff 's recommenaa- tion that the resolutions be approved . District No . 5 Nos . 32 and 33 -Closeout of Contract No . 5 -19 . Th ese a~enda items will close ·out Contract No . 5 -19, Sewer Trunk 'Bu -Unit 8, Pacific Coast Highway i;:orce Main . (32 -a) Change Order No . 5 . Five items constitute Change Order No . 5 in the amount of $47,751 . The major item , $23 ,741 , is for pre mium time requir e d by the Contractor to p e rform the work during . the evening hours .which was not originally specifi ed in the En croachment Permit issued by the Division of Highways . Thi s change was required by the City of Newport Beach and the Division of Highways to better accommodate the tra ffic on the Pacific · Coast Highway . Also required was additiona l struc tura l asphaltic concrete paving, because the Division o f High ways was unable to schedule their channelization con- tract to proceed immediat ely after t he completion of the District 's Fo rce Main· faci l i ty as planned . Added costs of approximately $15,000 resul ted from utility interferences which were not de l ineated on the contract plans . Uti.li ty records were not definitive at the time of the preparation of the plans. A 12 11 high-pressure gas main inter- fered with portions of the gravity sewer on the south side of the 11 Arches 11 and had to be .relocated requiring the installation of additional manholes to avoid conflicts. In addition, the valve vault at the Rocky Point Pump Station had to be relocated and modified to avoid utility conflicts. $7,478 was for additional work to remove concrete debris located near the abutment of the 11Arches 11 overcrossing . This debris was the foundation and remains of an old ab~ndoned glass factory . An extra jacking pit was required for the instal- lation of the reinforced plastic mortar lining in the existing VCP gravity sewer in the Coast Highway. This additional pit was required becaus e there was a change j_n grade in the existing gravity sewer, adding $1 ,423 to the contract. (32-b) Change Order No . 6 •. This is a regular Change Order adjust"ing the final date of acceptance of .the contract and it allows time extensions due to changed con - ditions and inclement weather . It is r ec ommended that Change Orders Nos. 5 ·and 6 be approved, and that Res olution No . 73-137 -5 accepting the contract as complete be adopted . District No . 2 Nos. 44 and 45 -Communications from City of Anaheim and City of Placentia . The communication fro m the City of Anaheim approves the District's Environmental Imp act Statement regarding the Santa Ana River Inte rc e ptor from Katella to La Pa lma Avenues. The communic at ion from the City of Placentia approves the route selections for District No . 2 Master Pl an sewer fac ilities to be located within the City of Plac e ntia. -5- No. 4 6 -Approving Agreement with Southern Pacific Trans portation Company . The resolution appear ing in the agenda authorizes execution of an agreement with the Southern Pacific Transpor - tation Company to acquire an easement to cross Southern Pacific 's right of way in conjunction with the installation of a 63 11 sewer line on Contract No . 2-1 4 -2 . The easement is be ing granted to t he District at no cost . No. 47 ·-Autho r izing Executi on of Agreement with the City of F ountain Va lley re ~ Construction of Slater-Se g erstrom Bri dge . Previously, the Boa rd adopted Resolution No . 73-36 -2, authorizing execution of an agreement with the City of Fountai n V~lley to accommodate construction of t he Slat e r -Segerstrom Brid ge over the District '.s Santa Ana Ri ver Interceptor , at no cost to the District . Subsequently, it was determined that significant changes would be requir ed in the constr uction and · laying of the pipe to support the addit i onal over -b urden . Thi s additional work will be done by the Contractor for a l ump ·sum of $25 ,000, which is reflected in Chan ge Order No . 1 0 . The City of F ountain Valley has agreed to pay $22,000 of t he total Change Order if the District wi ll obligate itself in the amount of $3 ,000 . It is r ecommended that execution of a new agreement be authori·zed, providing for a limited financial participation by the' District in an amount not to exceed $3 ,000 . No . 48 -Change Orde.rs Nos . 8, 9, and 1 0 , Contract No . 2 -14-1. (48 -a) Change Order No . 8 . Included in this Change Order is the additional cost of $18,684 for the removal and the relocation of the City of Orange water main and additional support for the Metropolitan Water District water main which were in conflict with the installation of the interceptor sewer . The exact locations and appurtenant supporting structures were not dete r - mined until exposed dur ing construction . Also in- cluded is the removal and disposal of debris, which was discovered during the excavation , of old dump site material . This material was un - suitable for backfill and interfered with construction. -6 - Included in Change Order No. 8 is a deduction in the amount of $7 ,250 which r eflects the savi ngs because of contractural changes benefiting the Contractor 's operation but not affecting the final installation of the trunk sewer . The Cont ractor was reliev ed of the respon s ibility of tunneling under the Southern Pacific Rai lroad crossing and the tunneling underneath a reinforced concrete box storm drain because of changes in requirements of the affected agencies . The net Change Order adds $11 ,434 to the contract . (48 -b) Change Order No . 9 . This Change Order is for the p l acement and compacti on of 1,005 cubi c yards of additional stabilization base rock material. wh ich is specified as a stipulated price item in the proposal . The placement of this material was requir ed because of uns~able material found in the trench excavati on . The Change Order adds $7,537 to the contract. (48 -c) Change Order No . 10 . This Change Order adds $25 ,000 to the contract for the necessary structural changes in the pipe bedding to accommodate t he prop osed s·l a ter - Segerstrom bridge crossing of the Santa Ana River as previously r eport ed for Agenda Item No . 4 7 . No . 49 -Gr ant of Easement f r om San Diego Pipeline Company.. The ac tion appearing on the agenda authorizes the acceptanc e of a Grant of Easement from the San Di ego Pipe l ine Company for right of way to construct a segme nt of Contract No . 2 -14-2 at a cost of $3,500 . It is the staff 's recommenda- tion t hat the action be approved . No . 50 -Request from the City of Orange to Serve Tract No . 8149 through Facilities Locat e d wi t h in Dis trict No . 7 . The Public Works Department of the City of Orange has requested appr oval to serve a proposed subdivision which li es within Di strict No . 2 through facilities which are in District No. 7 . It is recommended that the Dis trict's staff meet with -7 - personnel from the Or ange Public Works Department to discus s what sewer facilities can accommodate this development. Tract No . 8 149 is in a drainage area which is tributary to the District Nq . 2 Ol ive Subtrunk Sewe r . District No . 7 Nos . 55 and 56 -Communications r e : Contract No . 7 -5 -l R • . We have received two communications regard i ng unpaid obligations of the contractor for the Westside Relief Trunk, Contract No . 7 -5 -lR .· The actions appearing on the agenda r eceive and file the communicati9ns .• _ Nos . 57 and 58 -Cl oseout of Cont ract No . 7 -5 -lR. These agenda items are necessary to close out Contract No . 7-5 -l R. The following is an exp l anat i on of the three Change Orders . It i s recommended that a Cl oseout Ag r eement with the contractor be authorized with re gard to Change Orde r s Nos. 4 and 5 : (57 -a) Change Ord er No . 3. This Change Or der is a r egular Change Order which reflec ts the final quantit i es of work performed by the Contractor and adjusts the final contract . Change Order No . 3 adds $2 ,463 to the contract . (57 -b) Change Ord e r No . 4 . Because of the difficulty encountered by the Contractor in achieving the necessary compaction r equirements , it is the staff 's recommendation that the Contractor be re l ~eved of any settlement associated with the trench compaction a n d that a sum of $12,500 be deducted f r om the f i nal contract price . The material in which the sewer was being placed was a saturated clay material and to achieve a relative compaction of 90 percent became quite difficu l t . The relative compaction of the un - disturb ed soil outside the trench area was less than the requirements and it is felt that the District , in assuming the Contractor 's liability, will not sustain a cost greate r t han the deducted amount . This recomm endation is also to mitigate the disturbanc e and inconvenience t o thos e affected by the construction in the Cities of Santa Ana and Tustin . Also included in this Change Orde r is an -8- agreed assessed liquidated damage in the amount of $6 ,ooo . The net effect of Change Order No •. 4 is to reduce the contract price by $18,500. (57 -c) Change Order No. 5. This is a re gular Change Orde r adjusting the final date of acceptance of the contract and it allows time extensions due to changed con- ditions and inclement weather . No . 59 -Report on Scheduling of Remaining Master Plan Sewers . The staff wi l l report on the work remaining to be com - pleted under the Dist rict's Master Plan and recommend a time schedule to complete the work during the next several years . No . 60 -Accepting Proposal of Boyle Enginee ring re : Diversion FaciTi ies . The District 's staff has reviewed possible revisions to the sewer system in the norther·n portio.n of the District which could defe r major construction by optimizing use of the Dis - trict 1 s existing collection system. Currently, sewer flows could be rerouted at four locations to reli eve overloaded conditions in portion s of the District. It is r ecommended t hat the proposal of Boyle ·Engineering to design the diversion f acilities be accepted. Fred A. Harper · General Manager -9 - West Coast scene California's outfalls Californi~ has 1000 miles of coast stretching from the sun-drenched, sandy beaches of the south to the timbered, precipitous sca·cliITs of the north. The co:lst is one of the state's greatest resources, but its value is often under- mined by conflicts in its multiple use.;. The problem is particularly acute in southern California where more than half of the slate's 20 million persons reside. The coast and its ·adjacent waters arc used for myriad forms of recreation, ho11sing and other construction, offshore oil exploitation, commercial and sriort fishing, sewage disposal, and military installations. In 19G9, in an unpr12cc- dcnte<l mov.e, five local agencies com- bined their resources to sponsor a study into one of the most sensitive issue~ of the area-water quality and coastal marine ecology. The first phase of the study, which lasted three years, pre- sented some data and evaluations that should cause sohf'r reflP.ction on the p3rt of environmentalists and others con- cerned ,...,ith water quality. The study known as the Southt'rn California Coastal Water Research Pro-. jcct (SCCWRP; rhymes with slurp) re- cl?ived support from the major county (shire) sanitation districts .:md from the two major cities, Los Angeles nnd San Diego, in the region. The local agencies set up a SCC\\'RP commission and a scientific cons11lti·:1g board that oversJw the rese>Jl'Ch and coordin;ltcd the study. Th<~ sdcntific contin~cnt includf'd marine biologists, chemists, geologists Jnd physicists who conducted the nrcessary research and called upon numerous col- leagues when the occasio;i aros<:. Pro- fessor John D: Isaacs (Scripps Ir.stitution of Oceanography) chaired the co!lsulting board. They were charged wi:h explor- ing the physical, chemical ar.d hiolo!!iral processes and phenomena in th<' w.ltrrs off the coast known as thf' ~outhcrn -ornia Ili6ht ;rnd to re-Litt' th<'~C' ll!lfflng:; to water quality man;1gemrnt ~ystcrns and to specify furthN re~carch requirements. Wh~1t is pC'rh:-ip~ the mo~t int rip1in~ result of thr thn'C'·yc.1r s~udy SC'e111s to lh~ 1·.1t hC'r self·l'Vid,,nt. T11t~ ~1;111.\;ird~ of wal<•r qu;ility <ll'l' primarily Sl'! for in- land fr<'shw;1trr hodil'"· The SCC\\"HP findings c-mph<isiS(' and 1·rcmphasisc the facl that "the waters of the sea-par- :;,uJ.it Iv those of a deep, diverse, and :Jthcr ·strongly circul.1ting region like :!le Southern California JJight-possess i n'o,;Jicnc:; of quite a ciitforent order 1 ::i.rn the frc::-hw..itcrs of the continent. ihc .:)Cd h.1s alw.iy.; been a sink for the :t>~1ching of the land, and the resultant :Nwatt'r is a solution so inimical to :errestrial and ·freshwater microscopic .ind m:icroscopic life that few forms can ~ ~ff ccl a transition." Furthermore they SJ\' tha~ cnvi:onmcntal prac~iccs de- ·,·c·JQpCd far freshwater environments :i:lve Ji:tle direct applicability to marine I . ~ituations. . · • Thr creatures of the sea come in a I I'. \\idc variety of forms and functions J!lowinr. them to tolerate greater en- '. \·iro11mcntal extremes than. are possibl? 1 '.:or frcslnvater and terrestrial commum- 1 '. :ies. For example. the SCCWRP pcrson- i nel started monitoring the Orange licounty sc\vagc outfall 1·5 years bciorc I j the authorities switched from an outfall I 1 :crminating one mile off shore to one 11 :erminating five miles o~shore. They : . fuund that the fauna rapidly recovers I, I from cnvir?nm?ntal ~tress w:1cn sc\vage .~ disch.:irge is discontinued. F urthcrmorc !I tl!ev reoortcd that the concentration of n trd~(: ~etals in the sediments rapicly 11 d~crca~ed du~ to (:xch;in~c anrJ mixini;! i• with 1.he w:J!er c0lumn. Thus tl:<'y claim !!~ ~hat most d1angc~ J.rc reversible. ~ T}ie ~ewa~'! discharge :-rem<> to affect a relativelv small area. \Vithin that area t! the fauna. art~ partic.u brly robust. The U density of creatures is greatest near ~' the ot;tf alls, <JS r.1ight be expected .. Most ' of t)1e sewag~ contains nutrients that encourage growth. "Natural" nutrients ~ usu1tllv sint.: to the bottom of the sea J and ;re only avai!ahlc when the cur- 1 rent$ wen r-l1ern up from their depths. ~ !n the confirwd dom"in of a lake, these ~ additional nutrients ,,..,·oul<l encourage n enough a]g'JC growth to choke off the ~ Jakc"s vi<?bility. Th·~ total flow of waste-~ w:i~cr into Sol.lthcrn California wat{'rS is 2fJOO tir.ics le~<; than ~he flow of the CJ<e;.11 currc·1~s that o.;v•ccp tl1rough the Bi~ht frorn th<.: :"\orth Pacific Ocean. JnGcp~n<l~Pt ol the <:nvironmcHtal stress du~ to the discharge. the marine cmn- rnunitv in Southern C;ilifornia is sub- jecrcd~ co:1tinuously •o natura1 changes in atmospheric and oceanographic con- ditions. Alt hou ~h the SCC\<\'l\P report com- r.1 c11·~ c; t~c :;~1nitat.ion district<> for their cor~petcnt prnctic1~s. there arc several di~turbing findings. A few species of bottom-dwelling fish <'xperience fin- eroc;ion dis,:;cse in rather high propor- tions. The investir,ators were not' able to corrclat1~ I his disease with <my of the substances llley 111onitored. These include DDT, l'CB~ ;111J I race metals. The group strongly reco111111cmlcd strict ('CJntrols or dtlori11atrd hydrocarbons, such ;:!<; l>UT a11d PCB, due to their ' poh'nt ial h.izard. New Scientist 12 July 1973 h cores of 1rn<listurt>c<l SC'dirnents taken l! f nmt the S<Jnta Barbara basin showeu an 1 1, . a•.toundin~ incr<'a.;c of lca1l and mercu'!' in the marine cnviro1111u~nt. l\l~rctffy m 1 i the sediments has doubled s111ce t~e . ,· turn of t ltf~ century :ind l~Jd has in- , c.reas<~d by a factor o_f 10 1.n the p;1~t few· de...:ac.ks. OcC'~tn i:11culat1on models indicate that these hvo metals rntcr the ocean from the nl.mosphen~. Thus the mercury levels are proh;1hly due tr> worldwide human activities rather thau to local sources. The lead is attributed ·to leaded petrol u~ed in automobiles. · The report recommended stricter con- trols on floatablc material such as oil and pbstics. :'\ot only arc Lhrsc materials aesthcticaly unpleasing but they can 'Carry harmful microorg;1nisms, such ns sewage bacteria, to the ~urfacc where they can disperse to bPaches and shell- fish beds. The tloaiaulcs dcfc;it the wl:olc purpose of hav!ng a subme>rged outfall. One curious -and as yet uncxp laincd result cmer~r.d from the study. Dotlom dwelling fish near the outfalls havr: less trace clements in their flesh than more disl.Jnt fish. In some cases the levels arc lower than for fish living in areas remote from man. It is possibic :hat the abundancP-of nutrients c3use the fish to grow rapidly and that the trJcc metals arc diluted by the n~w tissue. When it is explained this result m...1y be 'One of the most significant findings of the study. · Gerald Wick -· . r II BOARDS OF DIRECTO RS County Sani ta tion Distr icts of Orange Co unt y, Ca liforn ia JOI N T BOARDS MEETING DATE SEPTE MB ER 12, 1973 -7:30 P.M. (1) Pled ge of Allegi ance and Invo c ation (2) Ro ll Ca ll (3) Appoint men t of Chairmen pro t e rn, if ne cess ary FILE ..•.•••••••.••••••• LEmR ·······-···t l.j) we .... TKlR ·-· DI S TRICT 7 • Election of Chai r man ~ ..... ~:_.j:JN (5) EA CH DISTR I CT Post Offic e Box 8127 10844 Ell is Ave nue Fou n tain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: · Are a Code 71 4 540-29 10 962-241 l AGENDA AD JO URN MENTS •..• ::::: ... "- COMP & MILEAGE ••• t.c.::- FILES SET UP ....... ~ ..... .. RE SO LUTIONS CERTIFIEDV LElTER S WRI TTEN ............. . MINUTES WRITIEN ............ . MINUTES FILED ........•.••••• m Con s i d e rat ion o f mo tions approvin g ~inu t es of the f o ll ow i ng meet ings , as ma i l ed : ML> District 1 Au g u st 8 ,. 1 9 73 r egular Ml > Dist r i c t 2 Au g u s t s · ' 1_9 7 3 r egular N\\..> Di s trict 3 August 8 , 1 9 7 3 re g ul ar M.\ ~ Di s t rict 5 Au gus t 8, 1 9 73 r egul ar M\~ Di s tric t 6 Au gust 8 , 1 9 73 r egular h\ \s Di s t r i c t 7 Au g u st 8 , ·1 9 73 r egu l ar fi\ is EYJ::s tri c t 11 Au g u st 8 , 1 9 73 r egul a r @ ALL DI S 'r RT CTS Re port of t h e J o int Ch ai r ma.n (i§J ALL DI STRICTS Re p o rt of the Ge nera l Ma n ager , @ r ALL DI STRI CTS Re port o f t he Ge ne r a l Co u n se l I (9) ALL DISTRICTS CONSEN'r CALENDAR All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by· one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered separately in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name,· address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. (a) FlLE __ ....... . LETT!ll -·-····· A/C _'Ml .... (b) FILE ................. . Ir) <t I L!TT!R ~-···~ .. A/C .... TKLR •••• ··- F :LE ···-·--J . .2.) LEnER ........... - A/C _00.R .... ~. 0) (d) FILE ............... _ LE1TER ... -....•.••• NC-MR .... O.o. Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate one staff member to attend the Water Pollution Control Federation Conference in Cleveland, Ohio, September 30 -October 5, 1973; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging, and incidental expenses incurred Consideration of motion authorizing pajment to Southern California Edison Company for engineering design in connection with installation of 66kv to a 12kv substation to serve 46 MGD Activated Sluage Plant at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-16, in an amount not to exceed $3,500.00 Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding Printing of General Provisions and Standard Specifications, Specification No. P-002, to R. H. Landin Graphics in tne amount of $5,255.48. See page "A" Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommenQation and awarding purchase of Bar Screen Chain, Specification No. E-069, to Power Products c·ompany (agent for Moline Corp.) in the amount of $7,460.00 See page "B" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 3) -2- '· (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) fl ~·······_(~) LETTE;J .. t/ Consideration of Resolution No . 73-130, to receive and file bid tabulation, rejecting all bids to Rebuild No. 1 Engine at Plant No. 1, Specificat ion No. PW-031 , and directing that A/C -TKLR .... I FllE ---.LO .. . l.ETI!R ---.... . A/C -TICllt -· _Qfw. . .,/ said work be accomplished by utilization of Districts' forces, pursuant to legal opinion of the General Counsel. See pages 11 C" and "D" Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to advertise and award purchase to the lowest .responsible bidder for Three (3) Replacement Expansion Joints a t Plant No . 1 Headworks, Specification No. E-070, in an amount not to exceed $3 ,300.00 plus tax and freight (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to convene in executive session to consider matters re litigation on Ocean Outfall No. 2, Job No . J-10 ~·-o '-( (1 2) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to reconvene in regular sessio.n t ~-t-i.f ,N\\S ( i3) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to request a proposal from John Ca rollo Engineers for preparation of a project r eport for 75 MGD advanced treat ment expansion \FILE ...J../ --LETTER '~S\... A!C::.ma -at Plant No. 2, as requi~ed by the State Water Respurces Control Board i n connection with grant approval fo~ 1973-74 fiscal year projects, to be submitt~d to the Executive Committee for study and recommendation to the Joint Boards . See page "E " (1 4) t\f\~~ ALL DISTRICTS Consid eration of motion to receive and file the f6llowing letters received in response to communication of the Joint Chairma n regarding the Districts ' position on proposed legislation to gi ve cities discretion re underground utility FILE -·-M .. .;.·-·rights of way: LmlR ··-···- A/C _TIClR -· Senator Dennis E. Carpenter Assemblyman Kenneth Cory City of Irvine City of Yorba Linda Letter Dated: August 18, 1973 August 10, 1973 August 8, 1973 August 8, 19'(3 See pages "F" , "arr , "H" , and _"_I_" __ ~\~~~5~LL DISTRICTS ~·-Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from LETTER -orange County Water Management Agency, dated July 22, 1973, AIC -TKLR ~nd refer to Exe cu t i ve Committee for study and re c:ommen dation. ~~See page 11 Jr1 ~1·--ALL DIS 'rRICTS . · Fl~-Repo r t-and r ecomme ndation of Special Cammi ttee on Feasibility ( LrnE),.l::::::.. of Electronic Data Proc essing System, and consideration of )J~.TKLR _ action on Committee's recommendation -3- • . . ( 17) JI\\~ (20) ALL DISTRICTS Con sideration of motion to receive and fil e staff progress report on Treatment Plant Construction Projects. See page "K" ALL DISTRICTS Considerat ion of motion to rece ive and file certification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment ALL DISTRICTS Con sideration .of roll call vote motion approving Joint Oper at ing and Capital Outlay Revolving warrant books for si gnat ure of the Chairma n of District No. 1, and authorizing payment of claims listed on supplemental agenda attachment L ISTRICTS b:i.sine.ss~ cornrnunicati~ or supp~~tal agenda m , if any · M \.> (21 ) DISTRICTS 1 & 7 m~oN Consid e rat ion of motion approving suspense fund warrants, ~UPPtEMEN TAL AGENDA if any. See supplemental agenda attachment ( 2 2) DI STR;[.G.!;P--l.- --€-~e-i!-me-t-i-.efl-a'f>t)-P-ev-i-B-g-wa-~P..a:r-i4Ys-,-i~f-arci'Y-.­ S-e~]?±em-e-B-t-a..J:,.-a-ge-BB...a-a-t-t-ae-ft.m.@-H-t (23) ~-RICT 1 · ~e r b~_sines~d communic a tions ~ supplement~agenda it ems , if any (24) (2 5 ) DISTRIC1I' 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn i ~~q DIS'rRICTS 2 ·& 3 Consideration ~f items regarding Standard Agreements with cities for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges : (a) Con sideration of t he following resolutions approving and authorizing execution of Standard Agreements for Collec tion of Sewer Co nnection Charges with cities : G ::;::;:::: See page "L" A/C ~.TKLR --City ---"-- An aheim ----Orange Villa Park District 2 No. 7 3-1L12-2 No. 7 3-131-2 No . 73-132-2 Di strict 3 No . 73-14 3 -3 ( b) FILE --··-··--·· (@R~ .. L: C onside~ation of the following resolutions approving Supp l em e nt to Standard Agreements for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges with cities, incorporating "hold harmless" provisions as recomme nded by the A/C -TKLR -· Genera1 Counsel, See page 11 M1 1 Distric t 2 Anaheim No . 73-144-2 Or a n ge No . 7 3-1 33-2 Dis trict 3. No. 73-14 5-3 Villa Park No. 7 3-l 3 Ll-2 Q Status Re port r e . Standard Agreeme nt s for Collection FILE·····-·········-· of Sew e r Conne ct i on Ch a r ges with cities . See ~p age "N11 · A/C _.TKLR .... C'\ • • -.f'<. :f.,..._ c. ,uJ;;tlt. ·~ itr::!?~s ~~. ~~1, ....:4_ . ' (26) . \0 N\ ' DIST RICT 3 Resolut ions aut h ori zing ini t iation of proceedings to annex app roximately 155 acr es of territory to the District in the vi cin ity of the U. S . Naval Ammunition Depot at Bolsa Chic a Road and Wes tmi nster Av e nue , as follows: (a) Consideration of Standar d Reso lution No . 7 3-135-3 FILE --~-......... authorizing ini tat ion of proc ee dings to annex a.mE "V a.pproximat e ly 10 3 . 8 a cres of territory to the ···-··-····· Dist rj:ct in t h e vici n ity of the U. S . Naval >Jc -TICLR ·-Ammunition De pot at Bo l sa Chica Road and Westminster ~~~-Avenue (Proposed Annexat i on No . 3D -Uninhabited - ~~~~Bo l sa Chic a Road Annexat i on to Coun ty Sanitation District No. 3) (b) Con s ideration of Reso lution No . 7 3-1 36-3 F1Lf ··---·--authorizing init i ation of prorieedings to anne x approximately 53 .6 acres of territory to t h e Dis tric t in the vicinity of the U. S . Naval Am mun i tion Depot at Bolsa Chica Road and Westminster --...._l t\ c., ~R.J ········-·- A/C _ma ... , (27) Avenue (Proposed Annexation No . 3E -Inhabited - Bolsa Chica Road Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 3) See page 11 0 11 DISTRICT 3 Conside rat i on of motion to ·receiv e a nd file staff p r ogress r eports on construction of the Knott Interceptor , Contrac t No . 3-17; the Bolsa Reli e f Trunk Sewer and Bolsa Ave n u e Storm Drain, Contract No . 3-17-1; and t he Knott Interceptor , Reach 4, Contract No . 3-18 . See pages "P", "Q " ,,and 11 R 11 ~\\S (2 8 ) DISTRICTS 3 & 11 ITEM S oN Con sideration of motion approving s usp e n se fund wa rrants , su PP tEM EN T~L AG ENDA if any . See supplemental agenda i tern at tachrne n t DI STRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving warrant s, if any . agenda ite m attachment suPmJJ;~;A~~GEMDA See supplemental \f.!te )~--~·-···( 30 ) DISTRICT 3 ~ ·-·---····· Other bus iness and corrununications or supp l emental agenda Al'SJID>~~fe~t~~~GENDA items, if any -~-P \ ..... ~-~ • " -...u 1 ~U.. ~ i\e.sc . r'/3>-lc./7-3 ---~~~~ ~~~. Re..)> ... .-?3 -1'4 &-3 _..-_._(31) DIST RICT 3 ~- Con s i d e ration of motion to adj o ur '? ·. 5 3 (32) DISTRICT 5 (a ) FILE ···-············· LETTER ····-······- A/C -TXLR -· (b) FILE ·--·--· LETTER ---- A/C -TICLR - Consideration of ~otion approving Change Order No . 5 , to the plans and speci fic ations for Sewer Trunk 11 B 11 - Unit 8 -Pac i fic Coast Hi ghway Force Main, Contract No. 5-19, author iz ing an addition of $47,7 51 .00 to th e contract with A. G. Tutdr Co., Inc . & N. M. Saliba Co ., a Joint Venture. See page 11 S 11 Co n siderati on of motion approvin~ Chan ge Ord e r No . 6, to the plans and s pecifications for Sewer Trw1k 11 B11 - Unit 8 -Pacific Coas t Hi g hw a y Force Main , Co n tra ct No . 5-1 9 , g r a nt i ng an ext e nsion of time of 4 2 cale ndar days to the contract with .A. G. Tutor Co ., Inc . & N. M. Saliba Co., a Joint Ve nture . See pa g e 11 T 11 -5- . . (33) DISTRICT 5 FILE-=.;·~;-····· Consideration of Reso lut ion ·No . 73 -1 37-5 accepting ~ER ----·-·-··-Sewer Trunk 11 B" -Unit 8 -Pacific Coast Highway Force A/C --·TKLR -Main, Contract No . 5-19, as complete ; authorizing .i.==-~&....;._e x ecu t ion of a Notice of Compl etion; and approving ~ · Final Closeout Agreement . See page "U" /\'\\> (34) DISTRICTS 5 & 6 ·· ITWS ON C . d t . f t . . f d t SUPPLEME NTAL AGEN M onsi era ion o mo ion approving suspense un warran s , if any . See supplemental agenda atta.chment f'vil > ( 35 ) DISTRICT 5 . ITEMS o N Consideration of motion approving warrants, i f any . SUPP u:tAfNTAL AGENo~ee supp le mental agenda attachment (36) (37) E-38) (39) ( 40) (ln) (4 2) (43) DI RICT 5 Otn busin e ss an~ommunications or ~plementa l agenda it ems , if any ' DISTRICT 5 Consideration of mot ion to ad j ourn g':.S...:S- DI8TFHGT 6 ·-Bon side rat.i o B o :f' mB-t74-~·f>"FB..:v::l..-R§-Wa~aH..t..s...,-i-f-a-~:y.. &ee-&l::l.fr]9-:kem e-1Te-a"3:-a-ge-a6: a at ta e hme B t- DISTRICT 6 . l)tfier bi:siness ~communic ations or ~lemental agenda i t'e1ns , if a ny DISTRICT 6 Con sideration of motion to adjourn ~:ss DISTRICT B : -Gens i de r at i Gn o f Hl&~!*'B.:v4.-i::rg-:wfrP-PaftB--s,--:L-f--a-rty . · 8 e c sup }3'±effie-i'i-t-ad-a-g-enda at t ae-&me-fl-t. DISTRICT 11 her busin e ss an~mmunicat i ons or~~plemental a ge nd a it ms, if any DISTRICT 1 1 .Conside ration of motion to adjourn (44) DIS TRICT 2 PILI!~----Con s ideration of motion to receive and fi le Minute E xcerpt LETTD -·-f rom the City of Anah eim , dated Au g u st 1 7, 1973 , approving A/C -TKLR .... Di strict 's Envir o nmen ta l Imp a ct Statement re Santa Ana ____ River Inte rcept or Sewer, From Kate lla Avenue to La Palma ----·Av e nue , Con tract No. 2 -14-·2. S ee page "V" ( 45,.) DISTHICT 2 FILE t::> .•...• '.··-··-··-· Conside ration of mo tion to receive and fil e communic at ion LETTER --··-···· and re s olution from the City of P l acentia , dat e d Au g us t 23, 1 97 3, AIC __ mR ··-regarding appro v a l of route sele ctions for Di str ict 's Maste r Plan _·--··---.S ewer F a cilities loc a t ed wi t hi n the City of Placent i a . Se e p age "W" ---- (46) DI STRI CT 2 . FILE • ...'1L Con s ide r ation of Resolution No . 7 3-138-2 a u tho r i zing I < i v -execution of agreement with Souther n Pac i f ic Trans p ortat }.on 1\1; J =-Co mp a ny f o r cross j_n g un der So u t h e rn Pacific r i ght o f way . 14/C-TKLR -south of Ba ll Road, j_n conn ection with constr uc tion of the ---Santa An a Rive r I n terceptor , From Kat ell a Av enu e to La Pa l ma --·~··-·· Av enue , Con tract No . 2-14-2 . See p age "Xtt -6- ~ DISTRICT 2 (~0< cSi. ~~ ~ ) k ~ ~-~ Consideration of Re~o lution No . 73 -139 -2 , authorizing •w:~·--· executi on of agreement wit h the City of Fountain Valley \J!!!_ER ···-··-····· to accommodate construction of the Slater-Segerstrom we __ .TKLR .... Bridge over the District 1 s S a nt a Ana River Interceptor , 'f . ----Contract No . 2-1 4-1, at a cost not to exceed $-3 , 000 to V,s-o-u --~-the District, ·in form approved by the General Counsel; fV\,(S and rescinding Resolution No . 73-36-2 . See p age "Y" ·(48) DISTRICT 2 (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 8 , l5 flLE N\ to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River 111 LETm -Interceptor from Rec l amation Plant No . 1 to Katell a we __ TKLI -Avenue, Contract No . 2-14-1, authori zj_ng an add iti on of $11 ,4 34.oo to the contract with Su lly-Miller Contracting Company . See page "Z" (b) FI LE -----··-·-· Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 9 , to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No . 1 to Katella Avenue , Contract No . 2-14 -1 , authorizing an addition of $7 ,537 .50 to t he contract with Sully-Miller Contracting Company . See page "AA " LETTER -- A/C _na.R . -- (c) FI LE.-- LETTER- A/C _TKlR - Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 10 , to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No . 1 to Katella Avenue , Contract No . 2-14 -1 , authorizing an addition of $25 ,000 .00 to the contract with Sully -Miller Contracting Company . See page 11 BB 11 MIC.. (4.9) DISTRICT 2 /'I / . ,_....-Considerat ion of Standard Resolution No . 73 -1 40 -2 , \_®-·--authori zing acceptance of Grant of Easement f rom San Di eg o l!TTER 1--···-Pipeline Company for a permanent easement in connection .A7e~h~R -with construction of th~ Santa Ana Ri v e r Interceptor from '~ Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No . 2-14 -2 , .pa ~0 ,.c.• .. /t 'i.-v and authorizing payment in the amount of $3 ,SOO for said easement c5o) DISTRICT 2 fi~ Consideration of motion to receive and file let te r from LmER-..---the City o f Orange, dated August 27 , 1973 , requesting that AJc .... TKLR _ 'l1ract No . 8149 in District No . 2 b e served through .facilities l ocated within Distri ct No . 7 , and refer to staff for study and recommendation. See page "CC" (51) DISTRICT 2 Con siderati on of motion to receive and file staff progress report on construction of the Santa An~ River In terceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue , Contract No . 2 -1 4-1 . See page "DD " W°\\S (52) DISTRICT 2 ' .-ITEM S oN Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any . SUPl'tEMENTAL Ac-~e supplemental agenda attachment (53 ) (54) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjo ur n -7- t1..t:\\S Fi&5.?._L .. ,!6STR~~T 7t · f t · t · d f · 1 Stop Notice 1n · onsi era ion o mo ion o receive an i e LETTER ·········--· .. submitted by J. B . Crosby Co ., Inc. against Bomar Construction we .... TKLR -company, Contractor for West Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 9 , ----~20 & 22 , Cont ract No . 7-5-lR, in the amount of $1 ,500 .00 ----··--(5 6 ) N\ > ,,L! ---l!TT!R _ Afc -YKLI - DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from the City of Santa Ana , dated August 20, 1973, regardirig unpaid obligations to the City of Bomar Construction Company , Contractor for West Relief Trunk Sewer , Reaches 19, 20 & 22 , Contract No. 7-5 -lR . See page "EE" (57) DISTRICT 7 FILE ('a) C O d N 3 Consideration of motion approving hange r e r o . , lfTTl!R -----to the plans and specifications for the West Relief M.\S wc-m.a-Trunk Sewer, Reaches 19, 20 & 22, Contract No. 7 -5 -lR, l'' a ut horizing an addition of $2,463 .00 to the contract with Bomar Construction Company . See page 11 FF 11 FILE ( 0) LEmR-- A/C ___ TKLR - flLE --(-cl LETIER- A/C _llWl - Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4, to the plans and specifications for the West Re lief Trunk Sewer , Reaches 19 , 20 & 22, Contract No . 7-5-lR , a u thorizing a deduction of $18 ,500 .00 to the contract with Boma r Construction Company . See page "GG " Consideration of motion app roving Change Order No . 5, to th e plans and speci fic ations for the West Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 19, 20 & 22, Contract No . 7-5-lR, granting a time exte nsion of 144 calendar days to t he contract with Bomar Construction Company . See page "Hi-I" (5 8) DISTRICT 7 . Ml c_ FILE ···-·-······-· Consideration of Resolution No . 7 3 -1 41 -7, .accepting West .J ~~ .. :~!. .. Relief Trunk Sewer, Reac hes 19, 20 & 22 , Contract No . 7-5-lR, A{c TKLR as complete·, and authorizing execution of a Notice of Comp letion j 'r;__;;. c~ .... upon receipt of l etters of permit compliance . from the Ci t:i.e s ·1'.'(¥ c-i, ,,.~ of Santa Ana and rrustin ; and approving Final Clos e out Agreement . c::;C t' See page 11 II 11 C:2~ DISTRICT 7 we~.,.<: Verbal staff report on scheduling of remaining Master Plan £,_c,\.J v,)L, facilities . See page "JJ" ~~~~TRICT 7 ~-{\'g -~Consid e ra t ion of motion to receive, file and accept proposal ~ of Boyle Engineerin g Corporat i on , dated September 6 , 1973, ~~o r engineering services ·in connection with preparat ion of A/C-TKLR-plans and specifications for Diversion _ Facilities , Contracts Nos. 7-3A-l, 7-3A -2, 7-3B-l, and 7 -3E-l , for a l ump sum f e e of $2 ,645 .00. Se e page "KK" }\\\S, (61) DISTRICT 7 ITE MS ON ~ • d t · f t • . t ' f SUPPL EMENTAL AGENo onsi era ion o mo -ion approving warran s, i · any . ee supplemental age nda attachment (62) DIS . ICT 7 ?the b:isiness an~unicatio~ supplement~ agenda it ems , if any . . · (63) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to ad journ q : D~ -8 -. MAN AGER 'S AGENDA REPORT Cou nty Sanitation Dis tri~ts Pos t Office Box 8 1 2 7 10844 Ell is Avenue Foun t ain Vo ll ey, Calif., 92708 Telephones: of Orang e County, California REGULAR MEETING Wednesday , September 12, 197 3 7 :30 p.m . Area Code 7 l 4 540-29 10 962-241 1 The following is a brief explanation of the more importa nt non -routine it e ms which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self -explanatory. Wa rrant li sts are not attached to the agenda since they are made up i mmediately preceding the meetin g but will appear in the supplemental agenda available at the meeting . The Execut ive Cormni ttee did not meet du r ing the month of August . District No . 7 . No. 4 -Election of Cha i rman . Chairman Clift·c:m Miller h as accepted a prominent position with the University of Houston, Texas, e.nd has subm itted his resignation to the Tustin City Council e ffective August 31st . Therefore , it wi ll be necessary for t~e Board to elect a new Chairman . Joint Boards No . 9 Consent Calendar . . The following age nda items fall into this category in accordance with the definition .es tablished by the Boards : (a) Attendance at National Meeting of Water Pollution Control Federation in Cleveland . It is reconnnend ed that the General Manager be authorized to send one staff member to the annual meeting of this organization which repre sents all aspects of the waste treatment and water pollution control fie l ds in this country and several fore i gn coun tries . We have been active in this organization and their conf e rences and exhib its have proved to be extremely valuab le to the Dist ricts. (b ). Authorizing Payment to Southern California Edison Company for Engineering Design . The design engineers for the 46 mgd activated sludge plant have been in contact with the Edison Company concerning the power ~equire­ ments necessary to operate the p lanned secondary treatment facility at Plant No. 1. They have been advis e d by the Edison Company that to meet the construction schedule of th~ Districts, it will be necessary for the company to begin engineering design in connection with t h e instal- lation of a 66 KV to a 12 KV substation on the Dist ricts ' property immediately . The company requires that the District s agree to cover their e ngineering costs up to a maximum of $3 ,500 in the event th.e pro ject is sub - sequently abandoned . ( c) and ( d) Awarding Purchase Orders fo r Advertised Wor k and Ma t e rials, Specif ication Nos . P -002 and E-069 . (e) (f) It is rec o mm e nd e d that Purchas e Orders for r equi r ed mat erials described in the agenda for Spec ification Nos . P ~002 ~nd E -069 be award ed to the named lowest responsible bidders . Re build No . 1 Engine ~t P lant No . 1, Specification No. PW-031 . On September 5th, the Districts opened compe titiv e bids to rebuild this e n g ine . The b ids were con - s iderably higher t han the staff esti mates the work can be accomplished for . Attac hed to the agenda supporting ma t e rial i s the staff's memorandum recommending tha t all bids be rej ec t ed and that the work .b e p erfo rme d using District forces . This appears to b e in the best i nt erest of the District s b e caus e of a possible saving of over $6 ,ooo . Authorizing the Gene r al Manager to Advertise for Ac q uisi t ion of Three Replacement Expansion J oints . It is r e commend ed that th e ac tion appearing on the consent cale nd ar (f) be authorized to acquire three r e placement piping expan sion joints for t he P l a n t No . 1 Headworks , in an amount not to e xc eed $3 ,300 plus tax and freight . ~ ·-2 - No. 11 -Report on Litigation, Job No . J-1 0 . On Februar y 14, 1973, the Boards authori zed emp l oyment of Garvin F . Shallenberger, of Rutan and Tucker, to represent the Districts concerning litigation resul ting from the con - struction of Ocean Outfall No . 2 by Peter Kiewit Sons ' Company . Mr . Shall enberger will report on the case developments to date and answer questions from t he Boa r d members . No . 1 3 -Requesting Proposal fo~ Project Report for 75 mgd Advanced Treatment . The Districts have just received not i fication from the State Water Resources Control Board to proceed with the prepara- t ion of a Pr oject Report for the fiscal year 1973-74 Clean Water Construction Grants . Our agency has a project to expand Pl ant No . 2 faci l ities, including provisions for 75 mgd advanced waste treatment. Before any proposed construction of treatment facilities can be considered for State and Federal grant · assistance , a detailed Project Report must be filed with the State . This report does not involve the design of the project, ·but r ather the evaluation of various t r eatment methods and a se l ection of the processes to b.e utilized . The letter, which is enclosed in the agenda material specifies that if this project is to remain on the 1973-74 priority list and receive cons~deration for funding, the Project -Report.with a l l support - ing documents must be submitted by. March 1, 1 974 . Since much of the information which is required for the Project Report is being compiled by the Districts' ·treatment p l ant engineers in a Master Pl an Report, it is the staff's recommendation that a proposal be ·solicited from them to prepare the Project Report for review and recommendation by the Executive Committee at the October Joint Board meeting . No . 15 -Communication from Orange County Water Manage - ment Agency. We have r eceived a commun i cation f r om the Orange County Water Management Agency suggestin·g that the Sanitation Districts consider possible membership in the agency . It is recommended that the .matter be referred to the Executive Committee for study and recommendation . No . 16 -Report of Special Committee on Feasibility of Electron ic Data Processing . The Committee will report its recommendation on the se l ection of a qualified firm to conduct a study of the needs of the Districts concerning the establishment of an electronic data processing system. As reported earlier, the Comnittee has met on several occasions and is cur r ently reviewi :~g pro - posal s from six firms . Chairman Stevens will present the Committee 's recommendation to the· Joint Boards on September 12th. -3 - Districts Nos . 2 and 3 No. 25 -Approving Standard Agreements for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges, and Staff Progress Report . Included with the agenda material is a progress report concerning the number of cities which have approved standard agreeme nts for collection of the newly -adopted District sewer connection charges . The staff desires direction from the Boards as· to what alternative steps can be taken in the event any of the remaining unsigned cities choose not to enter into the agreements providing for the collection of the Districts ' connection charges . District No. 3 No . 26 -Resolut.i.ons Authorizing Annexation Proceedings to Annex Approximately 155 Acres to the District . On August 9, 1 972, the Board approved, in principle, the a n nexation of this territory to the District and established . an annexation fee of $97 ,561 .17 . The two resolutions appear- ing in the agenda authorize t he initiation of annexation proc eedings for the proper~y . It i s the staff 's recommenda- tion that the resolution s be approved . District No. 5 N6s . 32 and 33 -Closeout of Co ntract No . 5 -19 . These agenda items wil l c l ose out Contract No . 5 -19, S e we r Trunk 11 B11 -Unit 8, Pac ific Coast Highway Force Main . (32 -a) Change Order No . 5 . Five items cons titute Change Order No . 5 in the amount of $47 ,751 . The major item, $23,741, is for premium time r e quir ed by the Contractor to perform the work du r ing the evening hours which was not originally specified in the Enc roachment Fe rmi t issued by the Di v ision of Highways . · This change was required by the City of Newport Beach and the Division of Highways to better accommodate the traffic on the Pacific Coast Highway . Also required was additional structural asphaltic concre t e paving, because the Divi s ion of Highways was unable to schedule the ir channelization con - tract to proceed immediately after the completion of the District 's Force Main facility as planned . -4 - Added costs of approximately $15,000 resulted from uti lity interferences whic h were not delineated on the contract plans . Ut i-li ty records were not definitive at the time of the preparation of the plans. A 12 11 high-pressure gas main inter- fered with portions of the gravity sewer on the south side of the 11 Arches 11 and had to be .relocated requiring the installation of additional manholes to avoid conflicts . In addition , the valve vault at the Rocky Point · Pump Station had to be relocate d and modified to avoid utility conflic ts_. $7 ,478 was for additional wor k to remove concrete debris l ocated near the abutmen t of t he 11 Arches 11 ove r crossing . This debris was the foundation and remains of an old abandoned glass f actory. An extra jacking pit was required for the instal- l ation of the reinforc ed plastic mortar lining in the existing VCP grayity sewer in the Coast Highway. Thi s additional pit was required because there was a change in grade in the existing gravity sewer, adding $1 ,423 to the contract. (3 2 -b) Change Order No . 6 .. This is a regular Change Order adjust"ing the final date of acceptance of .the cont ract and it allows time extensions due to changed con - ditions and inclement weather . I t is r ecommended that Change Orders Nos . 5 ·and 6 be approved, and that Resoluti on No . 73 -137 -5 accepting. the contract as complete be adopted . District No . 2 Nos . 4LJ. and 45 -Communications from Ci ty of Anaheim and City of Placentia . The communication from the City of Anaheim approves t he District 's Environmenta l Impact Statement regarding the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Kate lla to La Palma Avenues . The communication from the City of Pl acentia approves the route selections for District No . 2 Master Pl an sewer facilities to be located within the City of Pla centia . -5 - No . 46 -Approving Agreement with Southern Pac ific Transportation Company . The res olution appear ing in the agenda authorizes execution of an agreement with the Southern Pacific Transpor - tation Company to acquire an easeme nt to cross Southern Pacific 's right of way in conjunction with the installation of a 63" sewer line on Contract No . 2 -14-2 . The easement is being granted to the District at no cost . No. 47 ·-Authorizing Execution of Agreement with the City _of .F ountain Va lley re : Construction of Slat er-Segers trom Brid ge . Previously , the Board adopted Resolution No . 73 -36-2, authorizing execution of an agreement with the City of Fountain Va lley to accommodate construction of the Slater-Segerstrom Bridge o ver the Di s trict '.s Santa Ana Rive r Interceptor , at no cost to the District . Subsequently, it was determined that significant changes would be requi r ed in the construction and laying of the pipe to support the additional over-burden . This additional work wi ll be done by the Contractor for a lump ·sum of $25,000 , which is refl ec ted in Change Order No . 1 0 . The City of Fo untain Va lley has agreed to pay $22 ,000 of the total Change Order if the District will obligate itself in the amount of $3 ,000 . It is r ecommended that execution of a.new agreement be authori-zed, providing for a limited · financial p articipation by the.District in an amount not to exceed $3 ,000 . No . 48 -Change Orde·rs Nos . 8 , 9, a nd 1 0, Contract No . 2-14-1 . (48 -a) Change Or der No . 8 . I ncluded in this Change Order is t h e additional cost of $18,684 for the removal and the relocation of the City of Orange water main and a d ditional support for the Metropolitan Water District water main which were in conflict with the installation of the interceptor sewer . The exact locations and appurtenant supporting structures were not deter - mined unti l exposed during construction . Also in- c luded i s the removal and disposa l of debris, which was discovered during the excavation , of old dump sit e mat e rial. This material was un- suitable for backfil l and interfered with construction . -6 - Included in Change Order No . 8 is a deduction in the amount of $7,250 which reflects the savings because of contractural changes benefiting the Contractor 's operation but not affecting the final installation of the trunk sewer . The Contractor was relieved of the responsibility of tunneling under the Southern Pacific Rai lroad crossing and the tunneling underneath a reinforced concrete box ·storm drain because of changes in requirements of the affected agencies. The net Change Order adds $11 ,434 to the contract. (48 -b) Change Order No . 9 . This Change Orde r is for the placement and compaction of 1,005 cubi c yards of additional stabilization base rock material. which is specified as a stipulated price item in the proposal. The placement of this material was required becaus e of unstable material found in the trench excavation. ·The Ch ange Order adds $7 ,537 to the contract . (48-c) Change Order No . 10 . This Change Order adds $25,000 to the contract for the n e cessary structural changes in the pipe bedding to accommodate the proposed S1ater- Segerstrom bridge crossin g of the Santa Ana River as previously reported for Agenda Item No . 47 . No. 49 -Grant of Easement from San Diego Pipeline Company-. The action appearing on the agenda authorizes the acc e ptanc e of a Grant of Easement from the San Diego Pip e lin e Company for ri ght of way to construct a segment of Contract No . 2 -14-2 at a cost of $3,500 . It is the s taff 's recommend a - tion that the action be approved . No. 50 -Request from the City of Orange to Serve Tract No . 8149 through Facilities Locat ed wit hin District No . 7 . The Public Works Department of the City of Oran ge has request e d approval to serve a propos ed subdivision which lies within District No. 2 through facilities which are in District No . 7 . It is recommended that the District's staff meet with -7 - . - personnel from the Orange Pub l ic Works Department to discuss what sewer facilities can accommodate this deve l opment . Tract No . 8149 is in a drainage area which i s tributary to the District NQ . 2 Olive Subtrunk Sewer . District No . 7 Nos . 55 and 56 -Communications re: Contract No . 7 -5-lR • . We have received two communications regarding unpaid obligations of the contractor for the Westside Re l ief Trunk, Contract No . 7 -5-lR~ The actions appearing on the agenda r eceive and file the communica tiqns ... Nos. 57 and 58 -Closeout of Contract No. 7 -5 -lR. These agenda items are necessary to close out Contract No . 7-5-lR. The following is an explanation of the three Change Orders . It is recommended that a Closeout Agreement with the contra9tor be authorized with regard to Change Orders Nos. 4 and 5: (57-a) Change Order No . 3 . This Change Order is a regular Change Order which reflects the fina l quantities of work performed by the Contractor and adjusts the fina l contract . Change Order No . 3 adds $2 ,463 to the contract . (57 -b) Change Order No . 4 . Because of the difficul ty encountered by the Contractor in achieving the necessary compaction r equirements, it is the staff's recommendation that the Contractor be relieved of any settlement associated with the trench compaction and that a sum of $12,500 be deducted from the final contract p r ice . The material in which the sewer was being placed was a saturated clay material and to achieve a relative compaction of 90 percent became quite difficult . The relative compaction of the un - disturbed soil outside the trench area was less than the requirements and it is felt that the District, in assuming the Contractor 's liability, will not sustain a cost greater than the deducted amount . This recommendation is also to mitigate the distur bance and inconvenience to those affected by the construction in the Cities of Santa Ana and Tustin . Also included in this Change Order is an -8- agreed assessed liqui dated damage in the amount of $6,ooo . The net effect of Change Order No . 4 is to r educe the contract price by $18,500 . (57 -c ) Change Order No . 5 . This is a regular Change Order adjusting the final date of acceptance of the contract and it allows time extensions due to changed con- ditions and inclement weather . No . 59 -Report on Scheduling of Remaining Master Plan Sewers . The staff will report on the work r emaining to be com - pleted under the District's Master Plan and recommend a time schedule to complete the work during the next several years . No . 60 -Accepting Proposal of Boyle Engineering re: Diversion Faci i ies . The District 's staff has reviewed possible revisions to the sewer system in the norther·n portio.n of the District which could defer major construction by optimizing use of the Dis - trict 1 s existing collection system . currently, s e wer flows could be rerouted at four locations to relieve overloaded conditions in portions of the District . It is recommended that the proposal of Boyle ·Engineering to design the diversion facilities be accepted . -9- Fred A . Harper General Manager COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. P. 0. BOX Bl 27, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID.OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) September 6, 1973 \ TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 Gentlemen: TELE PH ON ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 Th~ next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, will be held:. · WEDNESDAY EVENING, SEPTEMBER 12, ·1973 AT 7 : 30 p I M .• 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA Tentative adjournment prior to next regular meeting: Executive Committee -5:30 p.m., September 25, 1973 West Coast scene California's outfalls Californi.:l has 1000 miles of coast stretching from the sun-drenched, sandy beaches of the south to the timb~red, precipitous sea-cliffs of the north. T.he coast is one of the state's greatest resources, but its value is often under· mined by conflicts in its multiple uses. The ·problem is particularly acute in southern California where more than half of the state's 20 million persons reside. The coast and its adjacent waters arc used for myriJd forms of recreation, housing and other ronstr4ction, offshore oil exploitation, commercial and srort fishing, sewage disposal, and military installations. Jn 1969, in an unprcce-- dcntc<l move, five local agencies com- bined their resources to sponsor a study into one of the most sensitive issue$ of the area-water quality and coastal marine ecology. The first phase of the study, which lasted three years, pre· sented some data and evaluations that shrrnld cause sober reflection on the pJrt of environmentalists and o~hers con· cerned with \\tater quality. The study known as the Southern California Coastal Water Research Pro- ject (SCC\VP.P; rhymes with slurp) re- ccivl!d support from the major county (shire) sanitation districts' and from the two major cities,' Los Angeles and San Diego, in the region. The local agencies set up a SCCWRP commission and a scientific consulting board that oversaw the research and coordinated the study. The .scientific contingent includrd marine bi<Jlogists, chemists," geologists nnd physicists who conducted the nrccssary research and called upon numerous col· leagues when the occasion arosi:-. Pro- fessor John D. Isaacs (Scripps Ir.stitution of Oceanography) chaired the consulting board. They were char~cd with ex;->lor- ing the physical, chemical and hiologiral processes and phenomena in th{" \\'.ltcrs ,,ff the coast known as thf' ~0L1th<'rn ifornia Bight and to rC'l:lll' th<'~C' ~din,:rs to watC'r qu~dity man;1f!t'mrnt systems and to specify further rc~e;irch rcqn ire men ts. \Vh~1t is pcrh:ips th<' most int ri~uin~ result of thC' thn.'<'-yr,11' s~udy SC't'lll:-> to lh~ rat hC'r' st•lf-C'vid••nt. The st;m,lllnl~ of w;ilc-1• qu<tlity an~ primarily St.'! for in· land frc·shw;1trr hndit''· The SCC\\'HP findings emphasise and rccmphasisc the fact that "the waters of the sea-par· :nil.it ly those' of a deep, dinr.;e, and :J!hcr strongly circul..1ting region like ::ie Southern C<!lifornia Bight-possess i n..";:licnc:; of quite a ctitrcrent. order 1 :'.t.rn the frcshw..iters of the continent. iiic :>CJ h.1S a!;-.-.1:;..; been 3 sink for the :i.>JChing of the land, and the resultant :e;1water is a solution so inimical to :ern~strial and -frc~hwatcr microscopic rnd niJcrosropic life that few forms can ~fleet a trans•tion." Furlh~rmore they SJ\' tha~ environmental prac~ices de· \·~·lope!d far frc:-hwaier environments :i:iv~ Ji:tlc direct applicability to marine I .5ituations. . I, ; ThC' · creatures of the sea come m a I'. 1\·idc variety of forms and functions Jl!owinr. them to tolerate· .greater _cn- l \'iro11ml'ntal extremes than are possible ! ~:or fr{'5h\vatcr and terrestrial communi-1. ~ie5. For example. the SCCWRP person· 1 ncl started monitoring the Orange County sev·•Jgc outfall l · 5 years before I !he authorities S\1,·itched from an outfall ! :errninating one mile offshore to one 11 '.c&minating five miles offshore. They ~' fuuncl that the fauna rapidly recovers 'f I from environmental stress v:hen sewage 1i discharge is ciiscontinucd. Furthermore i' u~ev renorted that ~he concentration of ~ trac12 ~etals in the sediments rapidly H· t!1~crcJ~cd du<_• :o ~xch:ingc and mixing '' ,,·ith ~he \\'3'.Pf i:olurnn. Thus tl:cy claim 111 l: !hat most c:h.-inges arc rc-.c:-silJlc. l TPe 'ewag'! discharge seem<>. to affect .t relativelv small are<1. \Vithin that area Jl the fauna· are particularly robust. The dcnsitv of creatures is greatest near the ot;tfalls, as r.1ight be expected. !\fost of t11c sewagP-contains nutrients that encourage growth. "Natural" nutrients usuallv sinl.: to lhi:! bottom of the sea nnd ;re onlv available when the cur· rents wc:J tl1em up from their depths. n !n the confim~d domRin Of a lake, these ~ additi<mal nutrients would encouras.;c 1, 1 enough algae gro\vth to choke off the IJke's vi<:?bility. Th·~ total flow cf waslc- w:ttcr into Southern C.-ilifornia watrrs is 21JOO tir:1cs lc~c; than the flow of the on'~•ll currc·1~s that s•vecp 111fou,!.!h the Diet ht from th~ 0."ort h Pacific Ocean. In~cp'.!nd'?r.t ot tho. £;nvironmcutal s~ress du~ to the discharge. the ma1·ine com- rnunitv in Southern C;ilifornia is sub· jeered~ co:itinuously to natural changes in atmospheric and oceanographic con- ditions. A !thou ~h the SCC\\'RP report com- r;1Cll'~' t~c sanitation districts for their cw!1pet~nt pr;irtices, there arc several di~turbin:.; findings. A few srccies of bottom-dwclli11g fish experience fin· erosion disc~1sP. in rather high propor· tions. The invcsti~ators were not· Jble to correlate this disease with any of the substances they 1nonitorl.'<l. These indudc DDT, PCB:=; and trace metals. The group stron!!IY rf'comrne11dcd strict <'Ont.rob of clilori11at<'<I hydrocarbons, such &!S Uiff and PCB, due to their pcJtent ial h.izard. New Scientist 12 July 1973 Lores of undisturoc<l S<'dirne11ts taken frtJm the S;rnta Barb;ira ha-;in showed an a'.tfJundin~ incrr.~1-;c of lf';icl anti mercury in the marine cnviro11111l'nl. ~l~rcury. in the sf!diincnts has <loublcd since t~c . ,-turn of th1~ cl·11tury :ind l<?d has in- c.rcasc·d hy a facto:· o.r 10 •.n the p;1~t few· dc...:atlcs. Ocean •.">?Tulal1oa models indicate that these two metals enter the ocean from the nt.mosphcn~. Thu~ the mercury levels are prob;1hly due to worldwide human activities rather thai! to local soun:es. The lead is attributed to leaded petrol u;;cd in automobiles. · The report recommended stricter con· truls on floatablc matcri,tl such as oil and plastics. :\ot only arc these matcri<?ls aesthcticaly unpleasing but. they can carry .harmfu! microori~1nisms, such as se,.,·agc bacteria, to 1 he ~urfacc where they can <lispcrsc to beaches and shell- fish beds. The tloalablcs defeat the wl:o1e purpose of having a subrtH'r.~cd out :"all. One curious rn1d as yet unexplained rcsu lt emcr~~d fro111 the study. nottom dwelling fish near the outfalls hJvc less trace clements i11 their flesh than mnrc dist<:mt fish. 1 n some cases the k'vt.:15 arc lower than for fish living in areas remote from man. It is pos~iblc that the abundanrn of nutrients <::iusc the fish to gro\'<' rapidly and that the tr~ce metals arc diluted by the ni:w tissue. When it is explained this rrsu lt m..iy be one of the most sir,nificant findings of the study. · Gerald lVick ! I . iSOARDS Of DIRECTO RS County Sanitation Districts Post Of!ice Box S 127 II of Orange County, Californi.-J ALL DISTRICTS JOINT BOARDS ·SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS SEPTEMBER 12, 1973 -7:30 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 71 4 540-29 l 0 962-2411 AGENDA (19) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving warrant books for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing payment o.f claims listed on page "I" DISTRICTS 1 & 7 (21) Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants. See page "III" DISTRICTS 3 & 11 (28) Consideration of motion approving suspense fund wa r rants. See page "II" DISTRICT 3 (29) Consideration of motion approving warrants. See page "II" (30) (a) Considera tion of Resolution No . 73-1 47-3, approving and authorizing execution of St and ar d .Ag re eme nt fo r Collection of Sewer Connection Ch a r ge s with the City of Seal Beach. See page "L" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 73-14 8-3, app r oving Supplement to · standard Agre e me nt for Colle c t ion of Sewer Connection Charg es wit h t he City of Seal Beach , incorporating "hold harmless" provisi ons as recommende d by the General Co uns el. S ee pag e "M'1 (c) DISTRIC TS 2 & 3 -Consideration of mot ion to receive .and fil e lett e r from Gard e n Gr o v e Sani t ary Di s trict , dated Se pt e mber 11, 1973, de claring their i ntent t o enter into agreeme n t s with t he r e sp ect i ve Di stri c t s to colJ.ec t connectio n fees wi t hin t he City of Ga rden Grove . Se e page "IV" (34) Conside ration of motion approving s u s p e n se f u n d wa r r ants. See pag e "II" DIS TRI Q'.I' 5 (35) Con s i de r a tion o f motion a p proving wa rrant s. ,, S ee p age __ "I~_" __ DI STRICT 2 (52) Co n s i de r a ti on of motion approving wa r r a n ts. S e_e p age 11 ._I _I_" __ D IJ}~rR~_C'l~ (61 ) Cons i derat i on o f mo t ion a ppr oving war~ants~ SE!e page .. ___ _'.,2_II_" _____ _ W~ANT NO. 21038 21039 2104:> 21041 21:)42 21043 21044 21045 21046 21047 21048 21049 2105:> 21051 21052 21053 21054 21055 21056 21D57 21058 21059 2106() 21061 21J62 21063 21064 21065 21066 21067 21068 21069 21070 . 21071 21072 21073 21074 21239 21075 21076 21077 21078 21079 21080 21081 21882 21083 21084 ~085 )86 21087 21088 21D89 2109() 21:>91 21-:)92 21:)93 21:>94 21:)95 21:>96 21Q9't 21:>98 21C>99 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF AAA Fremont Bag & Salvage, Sand Bags $ Alex Fish C6., Ecological Research Supplies All Bearing Service, Inc., Compressor Parts American Compressor, Compressor Parts City of Anaheim, Power The Anchor Packing Company, Pump Packing Armstrong Environmental Industries, Hardware Bank of America., Bond & Coupon Collection Beckman Instruments, Inc., Electronic Parts Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams Business & Institutional Furniture Co., Shelving Cals Cameras, Inc., Photo Supplies Cal State Seal Company, Gaskets California Auto Collision, Inc., Truck Repair John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services College Lumber Company, Inc., Building Materials Commercial & C.B. Communications, Communications Equipment Consolidated Electrical Distr., Electrical Supplies Constructors Supply Company, Tools & Hardware Control Specialists, Inc., Regulator & Parts Costa Mesa County Water District, Water County of Orange, Maps Mr. Crane, Crane Rental Crest Leasing Corp., Leased Vehicles Cylcone Excelsweld Company, Engine Repair . Daily Pilot, Employment Ad & Bid Notice P-002 Decker Instrument Supply Co.,. Controls DeGuelle & Sons Glass Co., Glass Nick DiBenedetto, Employee Mileage Ducommun Metals & Supply Co., Steel Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies &.Equipment Ecomatics, Pump Parts . Electronic Business Machines, Office Supplies Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring (MO 12~14-66) Engine & Compressor Supply Co., Parts Ensign Products Company, Lube Oil Enterprise Printing Co., Printing Robert F. Finnell, Sec. Treatment Meeting (MO 6-13-73) Fischer & Porter Company, Chlorinator Parts Fisher Controls Company, Regulator Parts Foss Company, Fo~m System . France Products Division, Engine Parts Fredson, Equipment Parts Larry Fricker Company, Inc., Weed Killer Gar Wood-Los Angeles Truck Equip., Inc., Seal$. Garden Grove Lumber & Cement, Building Materials General Telephone Company Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine & Odor Control Graybar Electric Company, Electric Supplies Hardware Systems Co., Lab Supplies Harlows Clocks, Time Repair Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting & COD Expenses Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc., Pipe Supplies Hertz Car Leasing Division, Leased Vehicles Hewlett Packard, Lab Supplies . · Honeywell, Inc., Metering Supplies & Strip Charts Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Beach Equipment Rentals, ~quipment Rental Imperial First Aid Supply Co., First Aid Supplies Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware · Int'l. Business Machines Corp., Office Supplies Johnston Pump Company, Pump Repair (MQ 6-13-73) I-1 AMOUNT 139.20 106.0J 235.68 762.67 15.0J 23.37 175.76 538.51 34.89 50.JJ 81.47 61.14 92.61 491.62 636.1:> 193.18 97.20 1,029.71 297. lC) 208.19 6.0J 44.34 1,448.4:) 147. 28 224.75 30.37 84.81 8.71 lOJ. IL~ 171.47 294.50 48.97 31.8:) 2,400.JJ 6.25 244.81 17.81 77.0J 623.38 886.4:> 21.20 127.2J 8.99 lll.3C) 16.18 544.84 2,203.53 5,351.92 31.8Q 242.85 47.99 159.88 158. 5J 433.48 41.34 387.65 1,337.24 3l+.65 357. 75 16.)6 24.93 38.16 7,211.92 WARRANT NO. ~100 _101 21102 21103 21104 21105 21106 21107" 21108 21109 21110 21111 21112 21113 21114 21115 21116 21117 21118 21119 21120 21121 21122 21123 21124 21125 21126 21127 21128 21129 21130 21131 21132 21133 21134 21135 21136 21137 21138 21139 2114J 2111n 21142 21143 21144 21145 21146 21147 211lt8 21149 21150 ~151 2.Ll52 21153 21154 21155 21156 21157 21158 21159 21160 21161 21162 21163 21164 ·IN FAVOR OF Kahl Scientific Instrument Corp., Ihstr.mentation ·$ Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supplies King Bearing, Inc.~ Seals Kleen Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial· Supplies, Hardware Kontes,of California, Lab Supplies Kressilk Products, Inc., Conveyor Parts LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Hardware & Tools L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Service The Lacal Company, Inc., Cleaner Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Equipment Parts Judy Lee, Employee Mileage Lewis Bros. Battery, Batteries R. W. McClellan & Sons, Paving Materials John McCullough, Employee Mileage Larry McLemore, Employee Mileage Marine Biological Consul tan ts, Inc.·, Marine Ecology Study Marshall Industries, Instruments Metermaster, Inc., Metering Supplies Morrison Company, Valves Nakase Brothers, Gardening Supplies National Chemsearch, Solvents & Cleaners National Lumber & Supply Co., Building Materials Nelson-Dunn Inc., Pump Parts City of Newport Beach, Water Newport Financial Corp., Hardware C. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel Retainer Noland Paper Company, Reproduction Paper Oakite Products, Inc., Cleane~ The Ohmart Corp., Electrical Supplies. Orange Coast Hardwood & Lumber, Hardware Orange County Chemical Co., Chemicals Orange County Radiotelephone, Page Unit Rental Orange County Stamp Co., Qffice Supplies & Rubber Stamp Oreo Electronics, Electro·nic Supplies Pacific Telephone Ron Parker, Employee Mileage Norman I. Parsons, Employee Mileage M. C. Patten Co., Pipe. Supplies Pictorial Sciences, Inc., Aerial Photos W. A. Plummer Mfg. Co., Operating Supplies Porter Boiler Service, Inc., Boiler Parts Postmaster, Postage Douglas E. Prebl~, Employee Mil~age Th~ Pryor Giggey Co., Freight Pyramid Fence Company, Fenqing Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal The Register, Employment Ad Richey ElectronicsJ Inc~, Telemetering Supplies Robbins & Myers, Freight Robertshaw Controls Company, Controls & Freight Jack H. Ross, Employee Mileage San Bar, Ecological Research Supplies Santa Ana Blueprint Co., Printing Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motors & Motor :>arts Santa Ana Electronics Company, Telemetering SupplieG Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Lab Supplies Scientific Products, Lab Suppli~s S. F. Serrantino, Employee Mileage The Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Supplies A. H. Shipkey, Inc., Truclc Tires . Singer Business Machines, Postage Meter Rental Smith Optical Service, Safety Glasses Snyder Manufacturing Co., Maintenance Supplies So. Cal Forming, Inc., Pump ~epair I-2 .AMOUNT 583 .85 1,532.67 47.70 179.44 115.60 . 4.45 1,230.84 914.21 1,709.68 22.64 200.70 26.34 129 .11 153.70 78.96 67.50 2,391.9:) . 21.2() 36.54 10.34 55.81 473.29 86.49 313.41 366 .15 7.95 8:>:>.:>0 905.31 107.27 116.26 72.50 23.32 24.77 17.72 20.08 462 .67 8.25 4.95 128.09 95.40 13.27 11.97 50·:>. 00 54.18 29.20 767.63 40.00 22.34 s~ 6~ ../ . _,; 8.18 595. 63 113.52 57.22 30.11 258.16 24.55 156.52 58.82 33.30 405. L~2 39 .29 60.42 6l~. 89 3·y. 33 37 .10 WARRANT NO. ~165 -_166 21167 21168 21169 21170 21i71 21172 21173 21174 21175 21176 21177 21178 21179 21180 21181 21182 21183 21184 21185 21186 21187 21188 21189 2119:) 21191 21192 21193 21194 21195 21196 21197 21198 21199 21200 21201 21202 212:)3 21204 21205 21206 ~07 ~.L208 21209 IN FAVOR OF Sou th Orange Supply,. Piping Supplies · $ Southern Calif. Coastal Water Research Project Authority, 73·74 Deposit per agreement Southern Calif .. Edison Southern Calif. Gas Co. Southern Calif. Water Co. Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water Speed-E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Stanco Mfg. Company, Equipment Parts Standard Oil Company, Gasoline & Diesel Fuel Stang Hydronics, Inc.,. Pump Parts Sully Miller Contracting Company, Paving Materials T & H Equipment.Company, Inc., Equipment Parts Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage · Tell Steel, Inc., Steel Tool & Hoist Division, Engine Parts Triangle Steel & Supply, Steel J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Blower Harry L. Twining, Employee Mileage Twining Laboratories, Concrete Test Supplies Union Oil Co., Gasoline United Auto Parts, Truck Parts Utilities Supply Co., Tools Van Waters & Rogers, Flocculation Study Supp. (M06-14-72) John Waples R.S., Odor Consultant Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts Western Fastener Company, Hardware & Pump Parts World Travel Bureau, Inc., Various Mtg. Travel Expenses Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage Xerox Corp., Reproduction Service George Yardley Assoc., Electric Supplies Zodiac Paper Co., Reproduction Supplies AMOUNT 188.72 73,350.:)0 28,723.08 1,301.31 . 3.20 100.08 382.04 37.31 481.56 707.23 308.50 53.89 37.62 832.8a 488.J.3 17.94 254.40 4.05 6:).0C) 1,128.46 685.65 136.90 2,073.28 264.GO 4:)9. 05 628 .12 324.54 57.18 963.26 58.82 60.04 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING $ 162,258.87 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING'FUND WARRANTS · IN FAVOR OF John Carollo Engineers, Engineering-Plant Constr. Daily Pilot, Bid Notices E-:)69 & PW-031 E.T.I & Kordick, Contractor I-8~3 Engine & Compressor Supply Co., Test Equipment Ficker Architects, Architect J-13 Mel Gorham Electric Co., Contractor P2-20 Hemisphere Constructors, Contractor P2-21 James E. Hoagland Co. & Hoagland Engr. Co., Contr. Pl-9-1 Franklin Miller, Inc., Pipeline Delumper 68,705.77 22.56 25,800.00 328.02 2,929. 50 7,123.23 107,173.24 61,332.:):) 5,966.22 38,231.61 1,683.10 239.60 572.93 24,440.0:) J. Ray Construction Co., Contractor J-13 Rutan & Tucker, J-10 Trial Counsel · Twining Laboratories, Testing J-13, I-8-3 & P2-21 Wilmington Instrument Co., Instruments F. T. Ziebarth & Ziebarth & Alper, Contractor J-4-1 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF I-3 $ 344,547.88 $ 506,806.75 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS ~ WP.. ANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 21210 21211 21212 21213 21214 21215 21216 21217 21218 21219 21220 21221 21222 21223 21224 21225 21226 21227 Chino Basin MWD, Construction Grant Transfer County of Orange,· Compaction Test 2-14-1 Lowry and Associates, Engineering Service 2-15, 2-17, 2-18 & Construction Survey 2-14-1 Sully Miller Contracting Co., Contractor 2-14-1 Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Testing 2-14-1 DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF The Register, Legal Notice Ordinance 304 2-16, ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering Service 3-19, 3-20 . & Construction Survey 3-17, 3-17-1, 3-18 County of Orange, Compaction Test 3-17-1 McGuire Construction, Contractor 3-17-1 Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe ·Testing 3-18 Twining Laboratories, Concrete Testing 3-17-1 DISTRICTS NO. 3 & 11 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Construction Survey 3-17 County of Orange, Compaction Test 3-17 Osborne Laboratories, Pipe Testing 3-17 J. F. Shea Co., Inc., Contractor 3-17 Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Testing 3-17 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF C~ty of Newport Beach, Connection Fee Collection FACILITIES REVOINING FUND WARRANTS The Irvine Co~pany, Bayside Drive R/A II-1 $ $ AMOUNT 455,700.00 187.(!8 21,875.78 838,798.65 3,152.00 1,319,713.71 25.06 5,993.50 17.01 24,509.95 988.00 90.00 31,598.46 $ 31,623.52 216.00 128.61 450.00 314,856.00 l,4o4.oo 317,054.61 297.50 165,480.39 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 · ~ SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF . 21228 A. G. Tutor Co., Inc & N. M. Saliba Co., Contr 5-19 II-2 AMOUNT 56,574.oo DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 21229 21230 21231 21232 21233 21234 21235 21236 21237 21238 Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services . Ervin Engineering, Refund Plan Check Fee Balance . Vista Park Homes #4 et.al., Refund Plan Check Fee Balance ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Bo-Mar Construction, Contractor 7-5-lR Boyle Engineering, Engineering Service 7-5-lR and Construction Survey 7-2D-7 County of Orange, Compaction Test 7-5-lR Thomas A. O'Sullivan and Ellis W. Stanley, Reinbursement Agreement Twining Laboratories, Compaction Test 7-5-lR Westclock Development, Refund Permit Fees DISTRICTS NOS. 1 & 7 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Amack Deposition Service, Legal Services 7-6-1 Suit -III- $ $ $ AMOUNT 25.50 i.9.02 85.00 129.52 3,585.60 3,610.50 361.91 543.56 60.00 800.00 $ 8,961.57 $ 9,091.09 $ 29.56 'f. ·tr~~.::a~~3~-~¥~L.SJf 1T • JEFFERSON 4-3943 e GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA 9264.C P. 0. 130X 1437 September 11, 1973 Orange County Sanitation District 10841 Ellis Fountain Valley, California Attention: Fred Harper Dear Fred: Re: Collection·of Sewer Connection Fees Confirming telephone conversation between y6u and Richard Rafanovic of the.City of. Garden Grove, and the under8i~ned, the Garden Grove Sanitary District is planning to collect the County Sanitation District Sewer Connection Fee for those portions of Districts No. 2 ·&· 3 that lie within the city limits of Garden Grove only.· It is our understanding that a contract covering this service will be entered into between the Sanitation Districts and our District, similar to the contracts you have with the cities. Please send copies of the contracts for signature by our officials. · Your cooperation in this ~~tter is appreciated. WMB/rg CC: City of Garden Grove Attn: Mr. Rafanovic Very truly yours, U//!?Q?/~tf' Walter M. Bressel, Secretary BOARD OF DIRECTORS ROOCRT H. MAIN. PRl'.SIDENT; VIALTl:R M. DRESSEL, St:CRf:TARY; Res;~ Pr'•ttE)Rf-~61X>N, ;r~..eR; NORMAN E. CULVER; ROUERT PEHRY l,.lil. ~!rlJX>~l f~ '.:..;:•,:::: .:!. \ -IV- Chairman Finnell Report of the Joint Chairman Call meeting of the Executive Committe_e ____ for 5:30 p.m., --·--.... ---------- Tu~s4_september 25th. Invite Directo~li,nd ~or Directors Edwards and Garthe. Entertain a motion to select an Alternate to Commissioner Parsons on the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. (to replace Clifton Miller). It has been the habit of the Alternate Commissioners to attend these meetings that are called, and there is a $50 compensation provided. The Commission meets once every two or three months. . . Report on meeting in Washington, D.C., October 1st, with EPA Assistant Administrator John Quarles and Deputy Assistant Adminis- trator Robert Sansom re: Best practicable waste treatment technology and secondary treatment requirements for ocean dis- chargers. Representatives will attend from Hawaii, Alaska, Washington, and California. Our Districts will present.a suggested definition·for "best practicable waste treatment technology" based on the experimental work we have done at both of our treatment facilities. MEETING DATE Sept . 12 , 1 9 73 TIME 7:30 p .m. DI STR ICTS 1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ,7 & 11 DI STRICT 1 (G ARTHE) ..••.• ·f'AfTERSON• • · ~ ---- (C ASPERS) •.••. BATT IN.?[\-;>~------ DI STRI CT 2 RIMA .. ······~ .--SALTARELLI··~ ---- IT ..... ~vE~S ) · · · • · NE VIL······• _k::::::.. __ --- b-IN GJ. ······CHAP UT······ ~ ___ _ CASPERS).···· CLARK······· ~ ___ _ CUL VER · .. • .. ~ ___ _ LANGE R) •••••• FI NNEL L..... ~ ___ _ Fox) ••••••••• KOWALSK I · ••• ~ ---- PATTE~SO N). • • GARTHE· · • • • • ~ ___ _ SCOTT).· ..•. • JUST· ... ~· .. ~ ___ _ REINH('.RDT). ··ROOT········ ~ ___ _ PEREZ)· • · • • • • SMITH· · · • • · • ,_.....--___ _ DUTTON).····· STEPHEN S ON ·· ~ ___ _ DUNNE).······ WIN N········ ~ ___ _ DISTRICT 3 lKOWALSl<J) ...• FOX......... ~ ---- CASPE ~S ) ..••• BATTIN ..•••• ~ ---- SALES) •..•••• B LACKM AN •..• ~ ---- CULVER •••••• ~ ---- (HINES) ....... DAV!S....... v' ---- ED WARDS . . • • • ,__...---. --~PATTE R$ON ) •.. GARTHE •••••• ~ ---- MATNEY) .•.••. GREEN .•.•.•• ~ ---- BR OWN ) .•..••• HYDE ...••••• ~ ___ --. MARSHOTT. • • . ,.------· ~FRAN K I EWIC H). RO BER TS .•••. ~ ---- REINHARDT) ..• ROOT ..•.•••• ~ __ --. _ HOLLI NJ)EN) ••. SCOTT ..•.•.. ~ ___ _ ~DUTTO N) ..•... STEPHENSON • _1::::::: ___ _ ROB ERTS) ••••• STEVENS ..••• ~ ___ _ BYRNE) ...•••• VANDERWAA L. ~--__ DISTRICT 5 (C RO UL) ...•.•• MC INNI S.... V-__ ·-- (BAKER) •...•.• CA SPERS ••••• ~ ___ _ JOI NT BOARDS !LANGER) ••••• CASPERS) •••• CASPE(<S) • • • • SA LES) • • • • • • FINNELL· • • • _.w:::::-_ -- BAKE R······ ~ -- BATTIN····· ~ -- BLAC KMA N··· ~ -- CASPE RS ···· o_., ~ (EWING) ••..•• CHAPUT"···· -1.::::::::. -- (CASPERS)···· CLARI<······ ~ -- CULVER····· ~ -- (HINES)······. DAVI S ·····~~­ (MATNEY) ••.•• DUKE······· ...----- KOWALSKI)· • • PA TTE R~ON) • • MATNEY····· MATN EY •·••• BROWN)······ S COTT) • · • • • • FOX) · • • · • · • • MC lf~NIS) • · • _ (CROUL) •.•..• (S TEVEN S ) •••• (C-AR TllE~ •.••• EDWARDS····~___,.:..... FOX········ ,,.........---- GARTHE· • • • • ~ -- GIBBS······~ __ GREEN······ v-__ HYPE······· ~ -- JUST····~·· ~ __ KOWALS I< I • • • -4.-==. __ KYMLA· ••• • • ~ __ MARSHOTT ••• _k::::::" __ MC I N N I S ., . .· ---k:::::: __ NEVIL...... , ___ _ Pf\TTERSON •• ___ _ PORTER .•• • • ---1L __ (BURTON) ••••• QUI GLEY· •• ·• ~ __ RI MA · • • • · • • .....--~F RANK i EWf CH) .ROBERTS •• •• ~ == J4G HHU Sf ••• RBGERS . ·• · • ___ _ RE INHA RDT) •• ROOT ... •.•· ~ _ SA LT AREL LI.~-- HOLL I tmEN). • SCO TT· · • • • • ~ __ PER EZ ) ••.••• SM IT H.····· ~ __ DUTT ON). • • . • STEPHENSON· ~ __ ROBERTS) • . • • STEV ENS· • • · ~ __ MC INjIS) ••• STO RE .. •••• \_-__ BYRNE •••••• VANDERWAA L. _k.:::::: __ (DUNNE ••••••• WINN ••....• V---__ KYMLA. . • • . • • ~ ----OTH ERS DISTRICT 6 r ) POR TER · • • • • • >CASPERS .•••. BATTIN .••••• l MC IN NI S ) •.•• STO RE .•••••. DI STRIC T 7 ~---­ ~----. , ___ ---- ; .. . ··SALTARELLI··~ ----1CASPER ~). ····CLAR I«······ ~......----__ -- .GART HEJ · · • • • • ·PPtT TERSGrq . • • -~ ---- PO RTER· · • • • · ~ ---- :BURTON)."····· QUIGLEY····· ~ ---- ,MC IN NIS).··· RO G§RS·: ~~ , __ ---- .PERl=:Z ). ······SM! I H ~· · · · · ,,,....----- DI STRICT 11 M.A TN EY) . ·: .... DU l<E ••••.••• _k:::: ----- :cA S PERs ) .•.• ·BAK ER · ....•. ~ ---- .MATNEY)··'·.,. ·G I BBS ······· ~ ---- 9/1 2/73 HARPE R SYLV ESTER LE WIS DUNN CL ARKE TAYL OR BROWN . NI SSON BLISS BOETTNER CARLSON FIN S TER GALLO~/A Y HOH.EN ER HOWA RD HUNT KEITH KEN NE Y LYN CH MADDOX 'MARTI NSO t~ PIE RSA LL STEV ENS - MEETING DATE Sept. ~2, 1973 TIME 7:.30 p.m. D1stRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 DISTRICT I J (GARTHE) ••.••• P.A.TTeRSDtJ• .-. ------ (CASPERS) ••••• BATTIN· • • • • • --j-----. - RIMA •••••••• ---y-.-- SALTARELLI·· ----- DISTRICT 2 s...--VENS · · • • • NEVIL······• ___:!__ --· --E~G) ••• • ••.• CHAPUT •••••• ~ ___ _ CASPERS) ••••. CLARK •• ••••• ~ ___ _ CULVER··.··. _____ _ LANGER) •••••• FINNELL •• ••• _L_ ___ _ FOX) •• ••••• •• KOWALSKI···. _.I ____ _ PATTERSON).·· GARTHE· • • • • • ~ ___ _ SCOTT)· • • • • • • JU ST· • • • ~ • • • _L_ __ __ RE I NHt\RDT) • • • ROOT· • • • • • • • _.:!.___ ___ _ PEREZ).······ SMITH······· _t__ ___ _ DUTTON).····· STEPHENSON·· _I ____ _ DUNNE).······ WINN········ _./ ____ _ DISTRICT 3 ~KOWALSKI) •••• FOX ••••••••• _.J__ --- CASPEBS) ••••• BATTIN .•.•.• _v ____ _ SALES) ••••••• BLACKMAN •••• -+ ---- CULVER •••••• ------ (HINES) ••••••• DAV1 S ••••••• _.1_ ---- EDWARDS ••••• -"---.--~PATTERSON) ••• GARTHE •••••• -~-.. ---- MATNEY) •••••• GREEN ••.•••• _v ____ _ BROWN) •••.••• HYDE •••••••• ~-----. . . MARS HOTT. \j . .t.· ____ --· FRANKIEHICH). ROBERTS .•• ~. ~ ___ _ RE I NHARDT) ••• ROOT ••••• ~ • • _.,·__ __ --. _ HOLLINPEN) ••• SCOTT ••••••. -~-___ _ DUTTON)~ ••••• STEPHENSON • •' ) -./-----ROBERTS ••••• STEVENS ••••• -T ___ _ BYRNE) ••••••. VANDERWAAL •• _____ _ DISTRICT 5 {CROUL). • •.••• MC INNIS •••• _./ ___ ·-- (BAKER) •...•.• CASPERS..... ~ ~-~- KYMLA. • . • • • • v DISTRICT 6 PORTER· • • • • • _v_ ---- (CASPERS) ••••• BATT IM ••• ·• •• _./_ ---- (MC INNIS) •••• STORE ••••••• -"'----- JOINT BOARDS CASPERS) •••• BAKER······ !LANGER)····· FINNELL···· ,,_,_ - CASPE~s) •••• BATTIN·····~-­ SALES) • • • • • • BLACKMAN· • • ~ -- CASPERS···· ---- (EWING)······ CHAPUT····· -""---. (CASPERS)···· CLARK······ -"'--- CULVER····· _x_ -- (HINES) •••••• DAVIS······ --7--- ( MAT N E Y ) • • • • • DU KE • • • • • • • KOWALSKI)· • • PATTERSON)· • MATNEY)····· MATNEY)·· • • • BROWN) •••••• SCOTT) ••• ••• FOX) • • • • • • • • MC INNIS) ••• (CROUL) •••••• . (STEVENS) •••• (G.ARTHE) ••• • • EDWARDS···· ~ ==:: FOX· • • • • • • • ~· ----GARTHE • • • • · _v--_ -- GI BBS······ _./ __ _ GREEN······ _L __ HYDE······· _v_ -- JUST······· _./_. __ KOWALSKI··· _v __ _ KYMLA. • • • • • _.,._ __ MARSHOTT. • • _\<, __ _ MC INNIS •• ~ -""-__ NEVIL •••••• _/ __ _ PATTERSON •• ____£__ __ PORTER .•••• _ ... /_. __ (BURTON). • • • • QUIGLEY •• ; • ___!!::__ __ RI MA. • . • • • • ~ ~F~~~KI _.~WJCH) ___ ROBERT_S •. ••• ~, == MC tNNIS) .•• ROG-ffiS ,,4. __ •. _._~ __ REINHARDT) •• ROOT ••••• •• _J_· __ SALTARELLI. -",., __ _ HOLLI ('JDEN) •• SCOTT •• •••• -~.-__ PEREZ)... • • • SMITH ••• •• • _. __ _ DUTTON) ••••• STEPHENSON. _·.· __ _ ROBERTS). • • . STEVENS •• • • _ .. __ _ MC IN~ Is) ••• STORE •••• •• -~··-__ . {BYRNE •••••• VANDER~1AAL. _, __ _ (DUNNE ••••••• WINN ••••• •• . . __ OTHERS /J f wax\_'<"'' 01 { 1 · ·--. .{ .,· l (~-· / 1 -• :./~-. , I (, ·.' ../ --y- -:r -v:- DISTRICT 7 ( L -' ... I/~ (-l ' ~., , HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS DUNN CLARKE TAYLOR BRONN / 7 p ~ . . ··SALTARELLI·· -~-----~CASPERS).···· CLARK······· ~-. ----~G/-\fffHE). • • • • • ~. • • _r/_ ----. ./ . PORTER· • • • • • -------' ) L" /A/ >BURTON • .. • • • QUIG E ,. • • • • -r ---- >MC I.NNIS). I •• R6GERS· ••••• ~ ---- .PEPr:zJ ••••... SMITH· •••.•• _____ _ DISTRICT 11 Q ~MATNEY)· ·: • • • ·DUKE· • • • • • • • -~.£ ---- ;cASPERS) · • · • • BAKEP. ···:..It:·· -7-----~MATNEY)· ·f· ·.··GIBBS·· .• W. · --------- DISTRICT 8 ~JOHNSON).···· . CLARK).······ CASPERS·~··· MITCHELL ••. 9/12/73 ..-~, \., ,, • ,~, i ·~· ... ez --~f Tlc --• NISSON BLISS BOETTNER CARLSON FINSTER GALLOWAY HOHENER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY LYNCH MADDOX "MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVENS l/ ~ ~ --.,,. ..... RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS September 12, 1973 -7:30 p.m. _ _; ... BID T A B U L A T I. 0 N SHEET Date August ~l, 197~ ll:GO a.rn. Contract For: Printing of General. _P,r.ovisions. a.nd Standard S.f:E.C ifications Specification No. P-002 l~ CONTRACTOR R. H. Landin Graphics Orange 2. Di-Line Corporation Orange 3. White Sands Enterprises, Inc. Santa. Ana 4. Impect Graphics Garden Grove 5. TOTAL BID $ 5, 255. 48 5,552.28 6,042.00 8,829.01 It is my recommendation that the a.ward for Printing of General Provisions and Standard Specif~ ations ·be m·ads to the . ·low bidder, R. H. Landin Graphic.s, e total amount ·of $5,255 .. 48 Agenda Item #9(c) -A-All Districts BID TABULATION SHEET Date September 5, 1973 J.J.:OO a.m. ~ Contract For: l. 2. 3 •. 4. Bar Screen Chain Specification No. E-069 CONTRACTOR Power Products Co. (Moline Corp.·} 6237 Maywood Avenue Huntington Park, Calif. 90255 .Barnes & Delaney 3330 E. 29th Street . Long Beach, Calif. 90806 All Bearing Service, Inc. 264 No. Manchester Ave. Anaheim, Calif. 92801 L. A. Rubber Co. 2915 E. Washington Blvd. Los Angeles, Calif. 90023 Linear Industries. Ltd. 2620 So. Hill Street TOTAL BID $ 7,460.00 $ 9,497.60 $ 9,,595· 54 No bid No bid Los Angeles. Calif. 90007 -----_.:: __ __:~~~-=--~~=---~~..!.-----------~---------- It is my recommendation· that t.he award for the Bar Screen Chain be made to the low bidder, Power Products Company (agent for Moline Company), in the.total amount of $7,460. Agenda Item #9(d) -B- 1 //}-/ /.J// / "'i~ . ~ l ~'"!/'_.,,<_ William N. Clarke Ma~ntenance Superintendent All Districts B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N SHEET ~ Contract For: 1. Rebuild No. 1 Engine at Plant No. 1 . Specification No. PW-031 CONTRACTOR Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc. 17803 So. Santa Fe Avenue Compton, Calif. 90221 Sep_tember 6, 1973 Date September 5, 1973 11:00 a.m. TOTAL BID $12,319.00 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.o:·aox 8121 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN. VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (7~4). 540-:!910 . (714) 962-2411 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Ez1:gineer William N. Clarke, Maintenance.Superintendent Districts' Bid -PW-031 -Rebuild No. 1 Engine at Plant No. 1 Bids were received on September 5, 1973· The low bid was $12,319.00, to which we must add 8% for inspection and s·upervision, making a total of $13,304.52 . . As reported to you in my memorandum of August 31, the Districts' forces can perform this job for $7,150. ·rt is therefore recommended that authorization be obtained to proceed with the job, as specified, using Districts' forces and that all other bid~ be rejected. ~ I concur in the above ' Agenda Item #9(e) -C-All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 73-130 REJECTING ALL BIDS TO REBUILD NO. 1 ENGINE AT PLANT NO. 1 AND DIRECTING COMPLETION OF WORK BY DISTRICTS' FORCE ACCOUNT LABOR A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, REJECTING ALL BIDS ON SPECIFICATION NO. PW-031, AND DIREC 1rING THE WORK BE COMPLETED BY DISTRICTS' FORCE ACCOUNT * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby determine that: WHEREAS, the Districts have published Notice Inviting Bids to REBUILD NO. 1 ENGINE AT PLANT NO. 1, SPECIFICATION NO. PW-031, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4755 of the State Health and Safety Code, and on September 5, 1973, publicly opened and read all bids submitted; and, WHEREAS, said bids have been evaluated by the Districts' staff, and the apparent low bid exceeds the staff's estimate by approximately seventy-two percent (72%); and, WHEREAS, the Maintenance Superintendent has· this day submitted a written recommendation that all b~ds be rejected and work be completed under the Districts' force a~count, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: Section 1. That the bid tabulation and recommendation of the Maintenance Superintendent be received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That all bids received for said work be hereby rejected and that all bid bonds ·be returned to the bidders; and, . Section 3~ That the Boards of Directors do hereby declare that said work can be performed more economically by utilization of Districts' forces; and, Section 11. That the Districts' staff is hereby diJ·ected to proceed with and complete Rebuilding No. 1 Engine at Plant No. 1, Specification No. PW-031, by Districts' force account. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1973. Agenda Item #9(e) -D-· All Districts Copies ·to: Chm. Pinnc 11 H. Hunt Ray Lewis w/enc. · STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY STATE WAfrR RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD r·''ISION OF WATER QUALITY CONTROL t\9l9'M 1015, RESOURCES WILDING 1416 NINTH STREET • SACRAMENTO 9.5814 "AUGUST 31, 1973 MR. fRED'A. HARPER, GENERAL MANAGER ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT P • 0 • Box 81 27 · FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 DEAR Mn. HARPER: RONALD REAGAN, Governor SUBJECT: F.Y. 1973-74 CLEAN WATER GRANT PROJECT -EXPAND PLANT #2 •IEADWORKS PRIMARY F'ACILITIES AtJD PROVIDE 75 MGD ADVANCED TREATMENT ON JULY 11, 1973, THE STATE WATER RESOURCCS CONTROL Bo~RD ADOPTED CRITERIA F'OR RANKING PROPOSED f.Y. 1973-74 SEWERAGE PROJECTS AND A CLEAN WATER GRANT PRIORITY LIST DEVELOPED PURSUANT TO THAT CRITERIA~ ON AUGUST 16, 1973, THE STATE BOARD ADOPTED AMEllDMENTS TO THC CLEAH \./ATER GRANT PROGRAM REGULATIONS, \./HICH ARE TO m: APPLJGABLE TO F.Y. 1973-74 PROJECTS. A COPY OF THESE REGULATIONS IS ENCLOSED. ON THE ADOPTED PRIORITY LJST 1 YOUR AGENCY HAS A PROJECT IN PRIORITY CLASS D. SUCH A RAMKltlG \./ILL ALLOW CONSIDCRATION OF" THIS PROJECT fOR f"U!WIHG IN F.Y. 1973- 74. W1TH THIS LETTER YOU ARE HEREOY AUTHORIZCD TO PROCEED WITH PREPARATION or A . PROJECT REPORT. It~ ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIOH 2115 Of THE Af.lENDEO GRANT REGULATIONS, YOU HAVE BEEN ASSIGNED A PROJECT REPORT DUE PATE or MARCH 1, 1974 roR THE ABOVE PROJECT. IF TKIS PROJECT IS TO REMAIN ON THE F.Y. 1973-74 PRIORITY'LIST AND RECEIVE CONSI- DERATION FOR FUNDING, YOU MUST SUOMIT YOUR PROJECT REPORT, WITH ALL SUPPORTING .. OO~UNENTS 1 BY THIS DATE. HOWEVER, ff" THIS DATE PLACES AN ADVERSE TIME CON5TRAINT UPON you, YOU MAY REQUEST A LATER "DUE DATE. CONVERSELY, IF WORK ON YOUR PROJECT REPORT HAS PROGRESSCD TO THE STAGE WHERE YOU COULD SUBtJ.IT YOUR REPORT CARLI ER, YOU MAY REQUEST AN EARLIER DUE DATE. ANY SUCH REQUESTS SHOULD DE SUBMl~TED DY OCTOBER 1, 1973.· IN NO CASE WILL AN ASSIGNED PROJECT REPORT DUE DATE FALL DEFOnE NOVEMBER 1, 1973, OR SUDSCQ.UtNT TO MAHCH 1, 1974. APPLICANTS ARC APPRISED or SECTION 2121 Of THE GRANT REGULATIONS WHICH REQUIRES PROJECT REVIEW /\tlD CONCEPT APPROVAL TO {3£ ror.THCOl·11tJG WITHIN 120 DAYS CF PROJECT REPORT DUC Dl\TE. To r.:r.:ET THI$ SCH!-:DULC, IT \·/ILL OE CRITJCAL THAT PROJ:::CT r.::PORTS ARE co:,1PLETE AIJD COMPf\EH!::tlS I VE. I NFORMAT I Ot~ f\CQUESTED IN THC Pi10JECT f~CPORT GUIDELll~CS ~~U~T OE INCLUDCD 1\t·~D SUCMITTED IN THE PROJt.CT REPORT. Rt:QUCSTS TO THE APPLICMlT FOR ADDITIOf~AL INFOR:~/\TIOH NOT INITIALLY Pf:OVIDED \·!ILL U~~tlF:CES5! ... RILY DELAY THC: r.cv1r.w Pf\OCCSS AIW l·~/\Y RESULT It~ fAILUf\~ TO HECEIVE CONCEPT APPHV/,\l WIHlltl THE 120-DAY PCRIOD. Fr~OJCCTS MOT APPl~OVCD IH THE 120-DAY PCRIOD \/ILL OE CARRIED OVEH TO A FUTURC FISCAL YEAR. IN V 1£\-/ OF RECENT CH/\flGE:5 IN THE FEDERAL AIW STATE GRANT PROG:1AM$ ANC IN AM EFF011T TO HCLP MUtllCIPALITIES THROUGH TllE Gl\M~T Pf\OCEss, THE GnANT TEAM !J"aAFr HOPES TO \.'ORK VCRY CLo:;cLY \-/ITH /\LL Gl~Ain APPLICANTS O.N THIS YEAR'S PROJECTS. \-!E INTEND TO .. Agenda Item #13 E-1 All Districts FRED A. HARPER, GENERAL MANAGER -2-AUGUST 31, 1973 MEET PERIODICALLY WITH EACH APPLICANT AS THE PROJECT REPORTS ARE BEING PREPARED. THE PURPOSE or THESE ~~ETINGS WILL BE TO MAKE EACH APPLICANT FULLY AWARE or rcoERAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS AND TO HELP THE APPLICANT AVOID PITFALLS THAT COMMONL y PLAGUE GRANT PROJECTS. THE r I RST s·TE p THAT MUST BE TAKEN BY EACH APPL I CANT Is THE COM PL ET I ON AMO SUBMITTAL OF THE ENCLOSED "KEY ACT I or~ QUESTIONNAIRE. ti THIS QUESTIONNAIRE SHOULD BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE SO THAT OUR STAFf CAN EVALUATE THE DATA AND BE PREPARED TO ASSIST YOU IN OVERCOMING PRESENT OR POTENTIAL PROBLEMS. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT YOUR AGENCY INITIATE THESE STAFF LEVEL MEETINGS BY CONTACTING THE GRANT TEAM EVALUATOR ASSIGNED TO YOUR P~OJECT. WE WILL IN TURN CONTACT THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTtCTION AGENCY AND TH~ REGIONAL BOARD. AN INITIAL MEETING SHOULD OE SCHEDULED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE WITH SUBSEQUENT MEETINGS BEING SCHEDULED AT KEY POINTS IN THE PROJECT REPORT FORMULATION. ASSIGNMENT or EVALUATORS TO SPECIFIC PROJECTS HAS NOT BEEN MADE AT THIS TIME. Howcvrn, GEN,ERAL AREAS WITHIN THE STATE HAVE BEEN ASSlGNED TO ONE OF TWO E.VALUATION TEAMS. REGIONS 2, 5A, 58, 5C, AND 8 ARE IN EVALUATION TEAM A -TEAM LEADER, MR. GARY t·lORRIS. REGIONS 1, 3, 4,.50, 6, 7, AND 9 ARE IN EVALUATION TEAM B - TEAM LEADER, MR. DONALD HODGE. CONTACT WITH THE APPROPRIATE TEAM LEADER MAY BE MADE REGARDING MEETlNGS ON YOUR PROJECTS. REVISED PROJECT REPORT GUIDELINES WILL BE PROVIDED IN EARLY SEPTEMBER. THESE GUIDELINES WILL BE SIMILAR IN CONTENT TO THOSE or PREVIOUS YEARS EXCEPT THAT GREATER DETAIL Of THE SPEClflC INFORMATION REQUIRED WILL BE PRESENTED IN A SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT GUIDELINE FORMAT. GREATER EMPHASIS WILL BE GIVEN TO THC DEVELOPMEtJT AND EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE PROJECTS AND TO THE FORMULATION OF THE RE COM MEN DE D PROJECT. THE MAJOR NEW RE QUI R EME N·ts ADDED TO THE GU I DEL INES ~ILL BE· THE INFILTRATION/INFLOW ANALYSIS AND COST-EFFECTIVE ANALYSIS PURSUANT TO THE 1972 AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT. . . ·FURTHER QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION R~GARDING THIS NOTICE MAY BE OBTAINED BY CON- TACTING EITHER AFOREMENTIONED EVALUATION TEAM LEADER AT (916) 322-2640. SINCEnELY 1 ~1 2' Wedd LARRY F /\•/f\LKER ·~__, ASSISTANT DIVISION CHIEF MANACCR -CLEAN WATER GRANT PROGRAM ENCLOSURE: Agenda Item #13 E-2 All Districts SACRAMENTO AOORESS STATE CAPITOL 95014 TELEPHONE: (9H5) 445·5031 DISTRICT AOORESS 3912 CAMl'US DRIVE VPORT BEA.CH, C" 92660 ~ ( 714) ~57-3200 DENNIS E. CARPENTER THIRTY· FOURTH SEN ... TORIA.L DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA LEG! SLATURE A~gust 18, 1973 Mr. Robert F. Finnell County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127 Fountain ·valley, California 92708 Bob, COMMITTEES SENATE SUllCOMMITTES: ON CIVIL OISOROER, CHAIR.,,N ELECTIONS ANO REAl'PORTIONMl!:NT FINANCE INSURANCE ANO FIN"NC:IAL INSTITUTIONS NATURAL RESOURCES ANO WILOl..IFI!: JOINT COMMITTEES MASTER Pl.AN FO!'l HIC>iE"< EOUC:ATION REVISION OF THE El..ECTIONS COOK COMMISSION OP' THE CAl..IFORNIAS I am in receipt of your correspondence .dated July 23 relating to. the City of Westminster's Resolution No. 14 76 relating to the adoption of City discretionary control of routes selected for rights of way in public s~reets. This is to briefly acknowledge your correspondence and thank you for the comments you have made relating to this.subject. You may be assured that as legislation of this type is brought to my attention, either on Committee or on.the Floor, I will certainly" give the matter a very careful study before casting my vote. Thark you for your time and interest in keeping me informed on these matters. DEC:.Bet Agenda Item #14 DENNIS E. CARPENTER Senator, 34th District :-F-All Districts .--; . ?J/ . /)./)/).AA_ ' ()/,,/,. DISTRICT OFFICE r ll.. /" r. 8100 GARDEN GROVE BLVD .• GARDEN GROVE, CALIF. 92641 TEL1 AREA CODE 714 638-7401 .j ,. : SACRAMENTO ADDRESS ~s£emhI t! STATE CAPITOL COMMITIEES Education Efficiency and Cost Control Elections end ReopPortionment Revenue and Taxation ~~ 9.SOl4 QJaHfu.mict IQcsi.sln±ure .. --~ "\ 1 ( . I 1 I < i I ' ! TELa AREA CODE 916 .US-7446 ' .. ~.-...... ,. . . ~ :-? ~:~~--.-:-·.·· .. ~---~~---:--__-........ _ -·· --"::.'. ~~·:.~:.:·i~·,. KENNETH CORY ./ • • ,. • . ASSEMBLYM>\N, SIXTY-NINTH DISTRICT DEMOCRATIC CAUCUS CHAIRMAN ~ August 10, 1973 Mr. Robert Hinnell County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. Hinnell: Thank you for your letter in opposition to a proposed resolution of the .. city of Westminster relating to local legislative approval of planned facilities owned by another .governmental entity. I am cognizant of the issues involved and feel that we really need a coordinating planning body. However, previous legislation to establish the right of one governmental agency to approve the facilities planning of another has heretofore been unsuccessful, and I do not believe such .legislation ·could successfully be enacted at thjs time. I ·appreciatr receiving your views. zrel KENNETH CORY KC:Mr ~ -... -..... ~-.!"II;--• ------: ·· T-·-r . ..f :t 111 ... ,...._.........,,....-.. .,-_,-.. -: ~ .... ·~ Agenda Item #°14 -G-· All Distrrcts ·· '· CITY OF IRVINE POST OFFICE BOX OZ IRVINE. CALIFORNIA 92664 TELEPHONE (7t4) 833-3840 ~ugust 8, 1973 County Sanitation Districts,of Orange County P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Gentlemen: In response to the communication dated July 23, 1973 from the Chairman of the Joint Administrative Agency of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, please be advised that the Irvine City Council upon consideration of Westminster Resolution No. 1476 determined that it would take no action at this time other than to receive and file. Thank you for informing us of your position in this matter. Sincerely, ~;p~?~ City Clerk cjf Agenda Item #1Li -H-All Districts CITY OF YORBA LINDA • Telephone 524-5000 Post Office Box A • 4845 Main Street • Yorba Linda, California 92686 . Robert J. Finnell, Chairman Joint Administrative Agency Orange County Sanitation District P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92808 Dear Mr. Finnell: August 8, 1973 The Yorba Linda City Council, at its regular meeting of August 6, 1973, consi.dered your communication of July 23, 1973 requesting that the City Council withhold support of the position of the City of Westminster regarding routes selected by special districts for rights-of-way in public streets. The Yorba Linda City Council, at its regular meeting of June 18, 1973, adopted Resolution No. 544, a copy of which is enclosed, concurring with Westminster's resolution. A copy of Yorba Linda's resolution was sent to the legislative repre- sentative from our area as well as to the Orange County League .of Cities. Thank you for advising us of the Sanitation District's feelings on this matter. dj :lm Enclosure * * * E\iRTHPlACE OF RICHAPD NIXON -37th PRESIDENT OF TtfE UNITED STATES * * * ·-Jrgenda Item #14 · I-1 All Districts RESOLUrIO:l IW. 544 A RESOLUTIO~ OF THE CITY cou~:crL OF THE CITY OF YORBA LHJD~\, REQUESTn:c STATE LEGISL\TIO~ TO CLARIFY PROVISimrs OF LN·l RELATING TO. THE USE OF. CITY STREETS ··: WHEREAS, the location of. public utilities and other facilities within street rights-of-way require a permit fror.a th~ City prior to installation, ?.n.d WHEREAS, a ·recent court decision found th,1.t the issuance of such perm.its· was a "ministerial" act not subject to discretion on the part of the legislative body,. and WHEREAS, a neighboring Orange County City recently did not concur ~1ith the location of a proposed Orange County Sanitation District lin2 and expressed the opinion that an alternate location would be more suitable from an environ.~~ntal standpoint; ho~ever, due to the above-referenced court decision, said City could not legally voice its objections. NOW_, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Ci~y Council of the City of Yorba ' Linda as follows: .I SECTimT 1. That the State legislative representatives of Orange County be requested to introduce and sponsor legislation to enable cities to have a greater voice in the specific location of underground facilities within street rights-of-way. SECTimr 2. That such legislation provide that unilateral decisions by special purpose units of governm2nts shall require concurrence of the legislative body of the appropriate unit of local governnent, or in the alternative permt a determination. by a court of competent jurisdiction. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk is.hereby instructed to send copies of this Resolution to the Oranee County representatives in th~ State Legislature and the Orange County League of Cities. . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council· of the City of Yorba Linda at a regular me~ting held on the 18th da~ of June, 1973. /s/ Carolyn Peirce Ewing CAROLYN PEIRCE BHNG Mayor of the City of Yorba Linda ATTEST: /sf Ar~hur C. Simonian ARTHUR C. SIHmrIAll City Clerk of the City of Yorba Linda STATE OF CALIFOP~HA) SS ·com~TY OF OIWIGE ) . I, ART.HU~ C. SIHONIA1.'I, City Clerk of th2 City oE Yorba Lind.2, Califo.r:J.iil, DO HE7..EBY CEP..TI~Y that the f o:!:'e6::>ing l?.~.sohition W::!.3 ac~opted at a ~~ gular meetil!g of the City ~oc..:ncil of th~ City of Yorl>:i Linda held on th2 ~ 18th cby of Jun2, 1973, a~J U.'.1:1 carried by the follm:in:; -r-all c~ll vot2, to t;Jit: AYES: ~WES: ADS~::!.': Agenda Item #14 COUlTCIUl.Si: Ci~~put, Ha<.:h :i~fo, Hec~aa, and E~rir.g com:cIU:2:J: ::on~ cou:·lCIL~·i:::!: C?.~; tr~ I-2 I .ct I Ar:..t.b..'..:::. __ c4--~ ..... · _._·i ,.........__,..., .... ~, ...... : __ ..,_~------- Ci.ty C.Lcr!' of tl1~ City of Yoi:'b:-! Lirld.:i All D'istrict~~ Orange County COMMISSIO.N: ..,,,,.; CARL J. KYr..1LA Chairman WILLIAM F. HURST Vice Chairman HENRY T. SEGERSTROM Secretary County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127 . Fountain Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: Water rJJ a n a g e rn e n t 1629 WEST SEVENTEEl'JTH STREET SANTA ANA. CALIFOnNIA. onoR Agency In the latter part of April of this year the Joint Powers Agreement (the Agreement) creating the Orange County Water Management Agency (OCWMA) was executed by the Irvine Ranch Water District, Moulton-Niguel Water District and the Orange County Water District. The general purposes of the Agency are to develop, provide, protect, improve and preserve the quality and quantity of the available water supplies to the area from all sources including subsurface supplies, imported water and reclaimed wastewater. The purposes of the Agency also include the preparation and accomplishment on a continuing basis of a Waste Management Planning Program. Implicit in these objectives is the desire to afford all interested entities the opportunity to join with the present Members of the Agency in pursuing these and related goals with a united, coordinated and mu tally beneficial effort. It was realized from the outset that the extent of desired involvement in a given instance may vary among the various Members of the Agency. For this reason, the Agreement was prepared in a manner which would permit a Member to be involved in the general affairs of the Agency but not in the benefits and attendant financial obligations of a particular project. Paragraph four on page number five of the Agreement creating the Agency, a copy of which is enclosed herein, was included to implement the desire for broad local representation by those interested entities which are empowered by their particular enabling legislation to participate in the Agency. If such should be the case, we request that your deci~ion in this regard be communi- cated to us. In order to avoid a duplication of effort in obtaining the requisite approval of the present Members of the Agency, we would appreciate hearing from you in this regard prior to October 25, 1973. At that time it is contemplated the existing Members of the Agency will be asked to approve the in· lusion of those entities which have expressed their desire to become Members of the Agency. As the Agreement reflects, the common powers of the Members of the Agency involve not only activities undertaken by those involved in domestic and agricultural water production and supply but · activities involving water pollution, control and reclamation. An initial review of various· enabling acts has indicated that some disparities exist relative to the requirement that a proposed Member possess the required common powers. It appears that, provided the election or alternative procedure provided for in the California Water District Law has been accomplished, there is no problem in regard to entities existing under the California Water District Law. This is also true as to a Com- munity Services District. As to a Municipal Water District, a County Sanitation District, a County Waterworks District and a County Water District, it does not appear that there is a problem. Similarly, no such problem exists in regard to a City becoming a Member of the Agency. However, in the absence of an election under Section No. 22171 of the Water Code a definitive answer is not pos- sible as to the adequacy of the powers that may be exercised by an Irrigation District. In regard to Soil Conservation Districts, and the Orange County Flood Control District, it does not appear that the enabling legislation applicable in these instances is sufficient. to permit such entities to become a Member of the Agency under the Agreement in its present form. Similarly, this is true of a Sanitary District formed under the Sanitary District Act of 1923. The l 972 amendment to Section No. 6512 of the Health and Safety Code is of limited assistance in this regard. Agenda Item #15 J-1 All Districts County Sanitation Districts July 27' 1973 Page Two While several of the e.nabling acts considered appear to create some difficulty in regard to this matter, it would seem desirable in the event any such ·entities desire to become a Member of the Agency to consider amending the Agreement so as to permit such to occur. In the event that it is desirable to pursue any such amendment to the Agreement it would be necessary prior to the inclusion of any such entities as Members of the Agency to insure that the proposed amendment does not interfere with any possible future financing that the Agency might wish to undertake at a later date. Please feel free to contact the undersigned and other Commissioners in regard to the Agency; further we will be available to meet with your staff as well as your Board of Directors at your request. Respectfully submitted, ORANGE COUNTY WATER MANAyEMENT AGENCY CJK:slh · Enclosure Agenda Item #15. J-2 All Districts COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA PROGRESS REPORT TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS P2-11-l -HEADWORKS "C" EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2 -($1,261,693) P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA n708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 NEW MAIN SEWAGE PUMPS: One under operational test. Bearing being replaced in other. NEW BAR SCREENS: New bar screens and drives are operational and have been in use since April. NEW GRIT CHAMBERS: In service. Repair work is required prior to acceptance. NEW METER VAULT: In service. Painting only remaining work. FOUL AIR SCRUBBER: Operational testing underway to determine best mode of operation and to provide data for secondary treatment design. REHABILITATION OF HEADWORKS "B": Not scheduled to start until all new facets of Headworks "C" are operational. Contract approximately 91 percent complete to date. I-8-3 -INFLUENT METERING AND DIVERSION STRUCTURE -($1,485,679)' ~€NT CHANNEL: Concrete channel 95 percent complete and backfilled. No · conne . .:tion can be made until main structure is completed. INFLUENT PIPING: Sunflower, Santa Ana, Euclid and Interplant Trunks extended to structure. Euclid and Sunflower Trunk bypasses in service. No connections can be made until structure is in service •. METERING AND DIVERSION STRUCTIJRE: Forming and·pouring PVC lined concrete removable walls. Installing sluice gates. Contract approximately 56 percent complete to date. P2-20 -POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT PLANT NO. 2 -($158,294) No site work is expected until all equipment has been delivered. Contract approximately 14 percent complete to date. Agenda Item #17 K-1 All Districts Progress Report Treatment Plant Projects ·Page Two COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 Pl-9-1 -ADDITIONAL SECONDARY TREATMENT AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 -($814,943) DIGESTER GAS CO~WRESSOR: Delivered, however, base not complete and corrections are required mechanically. NEW INCINERATOR, CONVEYOR AND RAMS: Brick~ incinerator complete. Conveyor and one new hydraulic ram table installed. PLANT WATER PUMP STATION: Concrete structure compl'ete. Tunnel piping and service to headworks installed. Disc water screen being installed. TRICKLING FILTER: Distributor is being corrected. CITY WELL WATER PUMP STATION: Installed hydropneumatic and air break tanks. Piping and pumps complete. Control components required to make Station operational on City water. NEW WELL: Well pump installed. Making piping and electrical connections. Contract approximately 78 percent complete to date. ·P2-21 -DIGESTERS "N" AND "0" AT PLANT NO. 2 -($1,076,514) DIGESTERS "N" AND "0": Digesters essentially structurally complete. DIGESTER CONTROL BUILDING: Beginning construction on foundation and lower walls. TUNNELS: Forming and pouring concrete walls. DIGESTER GAS CO?vWRESSORS: Equipment not yet delivered. STORM WATER PUMP STATION: Structure essentially complete. Contract approximately· 43 percent complete to date. J-13 -SHOPS AND WAREHOUSE FACILITIES -($1,061,989) ~ Deep sewer mains which pass under project area co.mplete. Rough. grading complete. Structural layout complete. Rough electrical and plumbing being installed. Agenda Item #17 · K-2 All Districts Progress Report Treatment Plant Projects Page Three J-13 -·SHOPS AND WAREHOUSE FACILITIES (Continued) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 Structural excavation and footing construction underway. Forming and pouring tilt up panels. Contract approximately 16 percent complete to date. J-4-1 -INCREASED WATER REUSE FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2 -($624,643) CITY WATER PUMP STATION: Structures complete. Waiting for equipment to make system operational. CHLORINE WATER PUMP STATION: Structure complete. Pumps have been installed. Installing water screen. Electrical gear corrections required to make station operational. PLANT WATER PUMP STATION: Slab, masonry walis, roof and ducting for electrical room and chlorination area constructed. No mechanical work can be done until chlorine water ptimp. ·station operational. ·Motor control centers installed in electrical room to provide power for chlorine water facility~ ~·VALVES AT ROTHROCK PUMP STATION: ·Operational. SHA:CER SCREENINGS CONVEYOR AND HOPPER: Area paved. Hopper relocated and new live bottom hopper installed and drive reworked. Contract approximately 69 percent complete .to date. TREATMENT PLANT WORK Total Value· Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During July Total Work Under Design DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK Total Amount Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During July Total Work Under Design $ 6,483,755 3,718,852 . 281,049 26,500,000 $19,444,773 10,725,201 1,286,277 5 ,67·5' 000 TOTAL AMOUNT UNDER CONTRACT .& DESIGN September 6, 1973 Ae;enda Item 1117 K-3 $ 6,483,755 26,500,000 .H ,444, 773 5,675,000 $58,103,528 All Districts RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING STANDARD AGREEMENT FCP. COLLECTICN ·oF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES WI1B CITY OF · A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION. DISTRICT NO._?_, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGE.S WITH THE CITY OF --------- * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.1_, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated , --------- by and between County Sanitation District No._?_and the CITY OF ---------for collection of connection charges, ~s provided 1n Sewer Connection Ordinance No. 203, as amended, is hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of t:1e District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said at:;£'eement .. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular ~eeting held September 12, 1973. Agenda Item #25 (a) -L-Districts 2 & 3 RESOLUTION NO. ------- APPROVING SUPPLEMENT TO STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF SEWEH CONNECTION CHARGES WITH CITY 0F1 -------------------- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SUPPLEMENT TO srrANDARD AGREEMENT FOR .. COLLECTION OF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES WITH THE CITY OF INCORPORATING -n=H~OL~D~H~A.,...,,R~M-=L,...,,,E.,,....,,S~S~"r--=P-=R...,,.O~V.....,.I"""""s"'"""r_o__,N ...... S--,--rfi~IE..,,,..R.E IN * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors o.f County Sanitation .. District No. 2 -- of Orange County, California, ·. DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Supplement dated August 8, 1973, to that certain Standard Agreement £or Colledtion of Sewer Connection Charges by and between County Sanitation District No. 2 and the · CITY OF f.or collection of Sewer --------------- Connection Charges, as provided in Sewer Connection Ordinance No. 203 , as amended, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and ·secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1973. Agenda Item #25(b) -M-Districts 2 & 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 September 6, 1973 . TO: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Fred Harper, General Manager STATUS REPORT-COLLECTION OF CONNECTION CHARGES PURSUANT TO ORDINANCES 203 & 303 (714; 540-2910 (714) 962-~411 On June 20 of this year, letters from the Chairmen of District 2 and 3 were sent to the city councils within those two Districts. The basis of this correspondence was to request the cities' cooperation in.collecting connection charges for both residential and commercial developments pursuant to Ordinances 203 and 303, which were adopted earlier this Spring. As of this date, agreements for collection of sewer connection charges have been approved by the following city councils: Anaheim, Brea, Buena Park, Cypress, Fountain Valley, Fullerton, Huntington.Beach, La Habra, La Pa'lma, Los Alamitos, Orange, Placentia, Santa Ana, ·v111a Park, and Yorba Linda. The following cities have yet to approve collection of connection charges: SEAL BEACH-The city council of Seal· Beach has yet to take action on the proposed agreement, however, it is scheduled .to be an agenda i tern at their next regular meeting on September 10th. · GARDEN GROVE-Within the last month, we have received verbal requests from the Garden Grove Sanitary District indicating their desire to act as the collection agent for the City of Garden Grove as well as all properties located within their jurisdiction. Difficulties lie, ·however, in the non-contiguous boundaries of the Garden Grove Sanitary District. Currently that Sanitary District acts as the sewering agency for the majority of the City of Garden Grove, as well as small portions of Anaheim, Orange, Santa Ana, Stanton, Westminster, and uninc·or- porated areas. .Agenda Item #25(c) N-1 Distrlcts 2 & 3 page two Status Report-Collection of Connection Charges Pursuant to Ordinances 203 & 303 September 6, 1973 COUNTY SANITATION. DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 WESTMINSTER AND STANTON-In light of discussions between the Sanitary District and the cities of Westmins~er and Stanton, both cities somewhat question which agency would .be better equipped to collect the fees. The matter is further complicated in the fact that the City of West- minster also receives sewer services not only from the Garden Grove Sanitary· District, but from the Midway City Sanitary District as well. At their regular meeting on September 5, 1973, the Boarq of Directors of the Midway City Sanitary District expressed their feeling that the intent of Ordinance No. 303 was that collection charges· were to be collected through the City Building Departments; and, they further expressed their intent not to participate in the collection of charges. · · Should the City of Westminster elect not to collect the required fees through their Building Department, charges would have to be collected at the County Sanitation Districts' office for property within the City of Westminster sewered by the Midway City Sanitary District. As of .. this date, the City of Stanton has yet to declare .its intent in collecting charges through their Building Department. The City of Stanton is sewered by both the Carden Grove Sanitary District as well as the Stanton County Water District. Should the Stanton City Council elect not to participate, an agreement with the Stanton County Water District would have to.be consummated or dev.elopers within that portio'n of· Stanton sewered by .Stanton County Water District, would be required to pay the connection fees at the County Sanitation Districts' office. RAW: ch Agenda Item #25(c) N-2 Robert A. Webber Chief of Industrial and Permit Division. Districts 2 & 3 RESOLUTION NO. 73-136-3 AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS RE ANNEXATION NO. 3E -INHABITED -BOLSA.CHICA ROAD ANNEXATION A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 3E -INHABITED -BOLSA CHICA ROAD ANNEXATION) * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: That an application for annexation of territory to itself be· made to the Local Agency Formation Commission as follows: Sectj_on 1. That this proposal is made pursuant to Di vision 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California; and, Section 2. That this application is for the purpose of annexing approximately 53.6 acres in the vicinity of the U. S. Naval Ammunition Depot at Bolsa Chica Road and Westminster Avenue, which said annexation is hereby requested by this Board of Directors; and, Section 3. That the territory to be annexed is inhabited; and, Section 4. That the designation assigned to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 3E -Inhabited -Bolsa Chica Road Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 3", the boundaries of which are more particularly described and delineated on Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 5. That provisions for all fees required to be paid as a condition of the annexation must be satisfied prior to completion of annexation proceedings; and, Section 6. That request is hereby made that such proceedings as required by law be taken to complete t~is annexation. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1973. Agenda Item #26(b) -0-District 3 MEMORANDUM September S, 1973 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager , FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer SUBJECT: Knott Interceptor Sewer -Contract No. 3-17 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 1084.C ELLIS AVE!'IUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (71.C) 962-2411 To date, work has progressed to approximately 2QO-feet north of Heil Avenue on Newland Street. Work at the intersection of Heil and Newland continues with the construction of several manholes and the tie-ins of local sewers. The reach of 96" RCP south of Heil was particui"arly difficult due to the requirement to bypass local· sewage while relocating the City of Huntington Beach's 12" and 15" VCP sewers to a location parallel to this project. Work on this relocation was accomplished by pumping during the day while construction was being done and diverting the sewage back into the newly completed line at night so that noise would not be a.problem~ All work in the tunnel under the San Diego Freeway is complete. Pipe was pushed into the tunnel on rails, and the periferal area between the pipe and the tumel was filled with grout. The water lines on Bushard and Ellis were tested and Ellis, Bushard and Talbert were paved up to the Flood Control Channel on Talbert. The pipeline from Brookhurst and Ellis to Warner and Newland will be ready to accept sewage as soon as the manhole structure south of Warner has been completed. When this work has been done and the bulkhead at Brookhurst and Ellis has been removed, sewage will be diverted into the new line. REL:BEW:hjm Agenda Item #27 . -P-District 3 ' I I I· I I . I· I l. FOUNiAlN \JALl,;C"Y J Cpm gle /e ft E//;'.;; . ; I ' :rt:·~.<: 1;u/' t1 I <l . t. ~ . ..,.;:::i::::r:P . HUN11NG TCN e~ACH ·. MA6N OLIA FOUNT~lN \'ALL~ --Carnp/:;/e . · .. ---lo be C<JJ7 :Jifr,:/cled t I . I 51R . -T ·. lf6fN D i. [ i '· I I i I I I I l ' I ··1 l I . . ! TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM September·. 5, 1973 Fred A. Harper, General Manager Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer COUNTY S°ANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. o~ ·aox 8121 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71"4) 5"40-29i0 (714) 962-2411 Bolsa Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 10, Contract No. 3-17-1 and Bolsa Avenue Storm Drain Work continues in the intersection of Bolsa and Magnolia, however, all work is confined to the east side of Magnolia. The west side has been backfilled, compacted and the first course of permanent pavement has been placed. Currently the Contractor is realigning the sewers belong- ing to the Midway City Sanitary District so that the concrete box storm drain can be continued through this area. Since all of Bolsa between Magnolia and Newland is to be paved by the Cotmty Road Department soon.after this project is completed, the Contractor has been instructed to place only a leveling course over his trench.. Manholes are to ce raised to grade when the County finishes their work. Traffic will continue to use the west side of Magnolia for several more days •. All work on this project is expected to be completed by ·September 15, 1973. _REL: BEW:hjm Agenda Item #27 -Q-District 3 MEMORANDUM · September ·s, 1973 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer .. ~ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 . 108-44 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71'4) 540-2910 (714) 962-2-411 SUBJECT: Knott Interceptor, Reach 4 -Contract No. 3-18 The Contractor continues to submit shop drawings and pipe layout diagrams for approval. The start of construction is scheduled for September 17, 1973 at Newland and Bolsa, and the tunnel bore pit wil~ be started on September 10, 1973. Traffic on Bolsa at .Beach Boulevard is one way west and permission has been granted, when construction is commenced, to close Bolsa from Newland Avenue to Beach Boulevard to all through traffic. The Contractor has started dewatering f~·om Newland to Beach and a 100-foot construction easement on the south side of ·Bolsa has been obtained. Currently, Hydro-Conduit, the pipe supplier, is anticipating a strike at its Irwindale facility. This could hold up the start of the main heading but should have no effect on the construction schedule for the tunnel at Beach Boulevard. REL:BEW:hjm Agenda Item #27 -R-District 3 ' I 0: -\ • .. ---{., :o·Mj:; / e l e. 1 ---To be con :S/ryc !~cl . ....- ~ 0 0 0 > Ill ~ 0 W~Tlvt lN 5Tt"~ MC-MOl<lAI.. .. PA~K . .. COUNiY OF ORAN6f .r • t . t . ··! •' ) { ' . ' LUUi~lY ~"\:~1TJ\TICJ:1 JJl~d·i~JCT!) 01: OJ'.,\.':(iJ: CCJlJ:,lY P • 0 • I~ o x 3 l Z 7 -lf);) -1 · i I : 1 l i !; , \ v e n u e · F o u n t ~' i n Va t 1 e y , C a 1 i f o r n i a ~J 2 7 0 8 .CIIA~CE OIWEI{ C.O. !~O. s ~~~~~~~~~~~~ co:\'rRACTOI~: A.G. TllTOll co. I r, N.~f. SALIBA r.o, JOTNT VT:NfURE DATE Septc'mbcr 12, 1973 JOB:..:.scwcr Trunk "R" -Unit 8, Pacific Coast Hichwa)' Force Noin -Contract No. 5-19 Amount of this Ch~ngc o.r<lcr (ADD) (~x}k~kf{l(Rx $ __ 4.;....;.7 ....... 7.i-::5..::.1 ........ O__,O~- ~ In accorclanc~ with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr:-ict and/or ccntract Hork arc hereby authorized and as c01:1pcnsation therefor, the folJoHing additions to or deductions from the; contract price arc hereby approvcJ. · . . ... . · References: · !n~pection Reports from March 22, 1973 to July 20, 1973 ADD: For extra paving, sandblasting, a<ldltional traffic striping, and barricading as requested by the Division of Highways and the City of Ne\·:port Beach to better accommodate traffic flow during the extended period of the contract. Contractor was also required by d~rective of the Division of Highways that ~ all ~ork performed could not be started·before 7:00 P.M. and had to be completed by 7:00 A.M. For utility interference not delineated on plans and existing force main t.ie-ins which were misaligned causing increased labor and materials to accompljsh neces~ary interconn~ctlon. For removal of.floor of old Newport Beach Glass.Factory, concrete headwall and other interference at the "Arches" to acco~modatc the gravity sewer. Extra jacking pit required for tcchite sleeve lining in existing gravity sewer .. Change in grade would not allow insertion without a<ldltional jacking pit. For additional T-lock manholes and rerouting of gravity sewer to _avoLd utility interference at the "Arches." Revise valve vault at Rocky Point ~ump Station and encase 24 11 'VC pipe ~nder Flood Control Channel. . ADD ADD ADD .. ADD TOTAL ADD Original Contract Price Prev. Au th. Changes This Chan!!c (ADD )>,~XN~kiXXRJ Amended Contract Price Boa rd authorization <late.: Approved: $ $ $ $ 23, 741. 00 8,313.00 . 7;~78.00 1,423.00 6, 796. 00 .. $47,751.00 678,500.00 64,082 • .SS 47,751.00 790,333.55 September 12, 1973 COlH-~TY SANITATimJ DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By~--~-----------~------~---------C on s ult 1 ng Engi.nccr By----------------------------~---CoH tractor Agenda Item #32(a) ..:.s- By --~~~~~~~--~~--c~l-11-c-,·-r....._.,t~n-r-,1-1-1-c· District 5 cou:;ry S1\:1 rT,\T ro:~ u r ~>Tl: rcrs or: oi>.,\::cE cou::ry P, o. l~ox 3127 -J.();q,i Elli~ ,\v<.'nuc 1: o u n ta in Va f 1 c y , Ca 1 i f o r n i a ~J 2 7 0 g CllJ\~GE OIWER C. 0. ;\Q. G COi~TRACTOR: A.G. TUTOR CO.· fr. N.M. SJ\LH~A CO •. JOINT VENTURE DATE _S_c_p-t«-:n--1l.-)c_r_l_2_,_1_9_7_3 __ _ JOll: Sewer Trunk "R" -Unit 8, Pa·cific Coast llil!hw~y Force Main -Contr:ict No. 5-19 Amount of this Change Order. (ADD) (DEDUCT) s ___ o;;;;...::•:...;;.0.-..0 __ ...,,,,, In accortlanc~ with contract provisions, the following changes in the contra c t and I or cc n t r a c t "'or k arc he r c by author i z c d an <l a s co i:-i pc n sat ion therefor, the folJowing ad<litions to or c.lc<luctions from the contract price are hereby approvc<l. ~·. · EXTENSION or·coNTRACT TIME The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of time due to inclc1ncnt weather 12 calendar days The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of time for delay caused by the Gas Company's relocation of their 12" HP gas main 30 talcndar days· . -. . Original Contract Date Original Contract Time · Original Completion Date Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date. Hoard authorization date: September 12, 1973 By _________ _,------~---- Coilsul.ting Eng1_necr lly ________________________ ~~----- C OJ l tractor Agenda Item #32(b) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION 42 calendar days • August 24, 1972 330 calendar d4ys July 20, 1973 372 calendar days August 31, 1973. .· Original Contract Price $ 678,500.00 .Prev. Auth. Changes 1 2 3 4 $ 111, 833. SS , ' ' and 5 This Change (ADD) (DDDUCT) $ o.oo Amended Contract Price $ 790,333.55 -T- .Approved: COUNTY SJ\NITATimJ DISTRICTS of Oran~e County, California By --~--~~~~-----~---l~;1-1~1-c~-f-· -1-~1-1r,-,~i-n_c_c District 5 RESOLUTION NO. 73-137-5 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 5-19 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 5-19 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, A. G. Tutor Co.·, Inc. & N. M. Saliba.Co .. , a Joint Venture, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for SEWER TRUNK "B" - UNIT 8 -PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY FORCE MAIN, CONTRACT NO. 5-19, on the 31st of August, 1973; and, . Section 2. That by letter, Shuirman-Simpson, District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That. the Chief Engineer of the District has con- curred in said engineer's recommendation, which said.recommendation is hereby received· and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That Sewer Trunk "B" -Unit 8 -Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-19, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 24th day of August, 1972; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Co., a Joint Venture, setting forth theterms and conditions for acceptance of said Sewer Trunk "B" ·-Unit 8 -Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Contract 5-19,·is hereby approved; and, Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held S~ptember 12, 1973. Agenda Item #3~ -U-District 5 ~ I - EXCERPT 1 2 City Hall, Anaheim, California -COUNCIL 'MINUTES -August 7, 1973, 1:30 P.M. 3 The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. 4 5 6 71 8 9 PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COll1-!CILHEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley; Thom and Dutton COUNCILMEN: None CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch ASSISTANT. CITY ATTORNEY: Alan R. Watts CITY CLERK: Dene M. Daoust DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Alona M. Farrens CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox PERSONNEL DIRECTOR: Garry McRae FIRE CHIEF: James Riley ·ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles· Roberts The following is an Excerpt of said meeting as recorded iri the book marked 10 "Records of the Council, City of Anaheim'', on Page 73-648. 11 "ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT -SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER (Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue): The Environmental Impac·t Report 12 1 prepared by Orange· County Sanitation District N.o. 2 in connection with the Santa Ana River i~terceptor sewer, together with 2 supplements to 13 same, was submitted and reviewed by the City Council together with analysis from the E.I.R. Review Committee. 14 15 16 17 Councilman Thom moved that the E.I.R. and the supplements as submitted for the Santa Ana River interceptor sewer(Katella Avenue. to La Palma Ave.nue) be a~opted as the Environmental Impact Statement of the Council. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.11 18 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) .COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss 19 CITY OF ANAHEIM ) 20. I, DENE M. DAOUST, City Clerk of the City of Anah~im, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the minute 21 entry on record in this office. 22 23 24 25 26 ·2? 28 29 30 31 32 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim· this 17th day of August, 1973. (SEAL) DENE M. DAOUST, CITY CLERK CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA Agen a Item #44 -V-District 2 I . I Orig. Jws/ Copy· REL Ma)'or The People A.re The City Councilm~n . ROBERT P. LANGER ROBERT F. FINNELL City Adminlslrnlor EDWIN T. POWELL 120 South Bradford Avenue -Placemia, California 92670 -Telephone (714) 528-1146 August 23, 1973 Mr. Ray Lewis, Chief Engineer Orange County Sanitation District No. 2 P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. Lewis: L. 1ACK GOMEZ MICHAEL J. CALLAHAN ROBERT B. LYONS At the regular meeting of August 21, 1973, the Placentia City Council adopted Resolution' 73-R-165 approving the· route selections for Orange County Sanitation District No. 2 1 s Master Plan Sewer Facilities located withln the City of Placentia. A copy of this resolution is enclosed · for your records. When the minutes of this meeting are approved, a copy will be forwarded to you. /sib Enclosure Agenda Item #45 W-1 Very truly yours, ~/h~- Edmund M. Ponce City Clerk District 2 - RESOLUTION NO. 73-R-165 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY O~ PLACENTIA APPROVING THE ROUTE SELECTIONS FOR ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 1 5 MASTER PLAN SEWER FACILITIES LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF PLACENTIA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF· PLACENTIA HEREBY RESOLVES: WHEREAS the Orange County Sanitation District No. 2 is prooosing to construct various master planned sewer facilities wi~hin City of Placentia streets and highways, and WHEREAS the City of Placentia has reviewed the prooose·d routes of the ·orange County Sanitation District No. 2 1 s Master Planned Facilities within the City of Placentia. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City of Placentia, in accordance with Section 4759. l(c) of the California Health and Safety Code approves the Orange County Sanitation District No. 2 1 s Master Planned Sewer facility routes located within the Ci~y of Placentia. ADOPTED BY THE PLACENTIA CITY COUNCIL ON August 21 , 1973. SIGNED AND APPROVED ON . August 2·1 , 1973. I -~fw.Lj;\~~ ATTEST: CERTIFICATE OF CLERK I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution h'as dulY-'adooted by the Placentia City Council at its regular meet in~ on August 21 , 1973, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Finnell, Langer COUNCILMEN: Gomez, Callahan, Lyons, COUNCILMEN: None COUNCILMEN: None IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 21st ___ day of August , 1973. · ~~1~ APPROVED: Agenda Item 114 5 W-2 District 2 RESOLUTION NO. 73-138-2 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY RE CONTRACT NO. 2-14-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS- PORTATION COMPANY IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER INTER- CEPTOR FROM KATELLA AVENUE TO LA PALMA AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-2 * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated September 12, 1973, wherein Southern Pacific Tr>ansportation Company grants to County Sanitation District No. 2 the right to construct the Santa Ana River Interceptor, From Katella Avenue· to La Palma Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-2, through Southern Pacific Transportation Company right . of way in the vicinity of the Santa Ana River south of Ball Road, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That use of said right ·or way is at no cost to the District; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1973. Agenda Item #46 -X-District 2 RESOLUTION NO. 73-139-2 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY RE SLATER-SEGERSTROM BRIDGE IN CONNEC- TION WITH CONTRACT NO. 2-14-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO·. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY TO ACCOMODATE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SLATER-SEGERSTROM BRIDGE OVER THE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-1 * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of .County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated ~~~~~~~~- be t~een County Sanitation bistrict No. 2 and the City of Fountain Valley to accommodate construction of the Slater-Segerstrom Bridge over the District's Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No. 2-14-1, in a form approved by the General Counsel, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the cost to the District in connection with sa~d bridge construction shall not exceed $3,000.00, payment of which is hereby authorized; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1973. Agenda Item #47 -Y-District 2 l. U U i ~ ! )' ~), '\: l J 11\ 1 I () : ) I ) l ~ ;. I i ~ I <: T :) 01: () ! '"' \ .' ~ t i I: U J lJ : , J ·r l'. O. Box 8127 -10~3·l 1 l Elli!_; ,\veuue . Fount a l n Va 11 c y , Ca 1 i for n i a ~J 2 7 0 8 CIIA:-~Gn Olrni:lt· C. 0. NO. 8 CO:n'IU\CTOI~: Sully-Miller Contrncting Corr1p:rny DATE SC]ptcml~cr 12, 1973 Santa Ana River Interceptor from lkclamation Plant No. I .JOB: to Katella Avenue, Contract' No. 2-14-1 Amount of this Change Ordct. (ADD) Q;U:mouo:x~ $ 11,434.00 --~~~--~~~ ...._,. In accorc.lancc with contr~ct provisions, the following changes in the contra c t and I or cont r a c t work are h c re by author i z c c.l an cl a s co I:l pc n sat ion therefor, the follmving a.<lditions to or c.lc<luctions from the contract price arc hereby approved. · . Reference: ·Contractor's letters to the District dated May 30, 1973, June 5, 1973 Add: and June 6, 1973. District's letters to Cont~actor date<l June 12, 1973 and agreement between the Contractor ahd Southern Pacific Railroad dated March S, 1973 and the Contractor's letter_ dated September 5, 1973. For removal and relocation of the City .of Orange Water Main at Station 340+28 ind the additional support for the Metropolitan Water District Water Main at Stations 338+59 and 338+95. ADD For removal and disposal of that portion of the old dump site over the trench prism from St~tions 140+00± ~o 152+00*. ADD ' TOTAL ADD Deduct: The Contractor's request for a change in method of construction, i.e. 3, 150. oo·-- 14,934.00 $18 '684. 00 _ open cutting as opposed to tunneling, at the Sot1thern Pacific Railroad crossing, Stations 235+25 to 235+75 is ·hereby granted. Items 17 &· 18 ; of the c_ontract wi 11 be paid in full, however, the District wi 11 realize a savin_gs for this method. : DEDUCT The Contractor's request for a change of method of construction, i.e. beam supporting rather than tunneling under the RCB from Stations 390+50 to 390+74 is hereby granted. Items 3~A 3~ of the contract shall be -paid in full, liowever, the District will realize a savings for th is method. . DEDUCT TOTAL DEDUCT. Original Contract Price Prcv. Auth .. Changes 3,250.00 4,000.00 $ 7,250.00 $ _ ____.6'-",_2 7..._4.-..a•--..6...;...0 8 __ ._4_0 - $ _ __.l_...,_._4 4_6'--1,,_6_47_._5_6 _ This Change (ADD)fOONMtXlxx $ ___ 1_1~1 4_34_._o_o_ Board authorization date·: September 5, 1973 By ____ ~------r--_,,_..-~-..---Cons ult i ng Engineer .ny __________ ---:...---;--~-;:--:"'~ Contractor Agenda Item #48(a) Amended Contract Price s 7,732~689.96 -Z- ~~~~~~~~- .Approved: COlH-ffY SJ\NITATIO!J DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By ____ ~--~~~----~~.,-..-_,.~~-----C ln c-f Eng inc District 2 cou;rrY :,J\:lIT,\Tlo:-: J>ISTi:ICTS OF (W,\::c;E cou::TY P • 0 • Bo x [} 1 2.7 - 1 C · \ · l 1 i E 11 i ~ , \ v (' 11 u c Fountain Valley, California ~J2'l08 CJ IA>1GE OIWi:R C. 0. ~\O. 9 -COi·aru\CTOR: Sul ly-~H l ler Contr~1c.tinrr, Comff.11.lY_ DATJ~ September 12, l 973 ___ _ Santa Ana River Interceptor from l~cclamation Plont No. 1 JOB: to Kate I la Avenue'; Contract No. 2-14-1 Amount· of this Change 0-rde~ (ADD) ~lUJ'lNX'X~ $ 7,537.50 ---~~~--~~--- ~ . In accor<lanc~ with contract provisi.ons, the following changes in the contra c t an <l /or c, · n ti~ a c t , ... o r k arc h c r c by author i z c d and a s co r:1 pc n sat ion therefor, the following a<l<litions to or deductions.from the contract price arc hereby approved. . .. Reference: Addendum No. 3 -Schedule of Prices -Section ·.us of Specifications ADD: The Contractor was directed to place one (1) additional foot of rock from Station 160+23 to Station 181+44· and six (6) additional inches from Station 181+44 to Station 197+20 because of poor ground conditions. .. 1, 005 cubic yards @ .$7. SO • 7 ~ 5·37. so TOTAL ADD . 7' 537. so ... ' .· ~~~~~=-=-=..=-=-~·============================================================================= Hoard authorization date: September 12, 1973 lly ____ ~---------------r--~--.,..~-----Cons ult i ng Engineer ny ______________________ _,.....~.=----:~ Contractor Agenda Item.#48(b) Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes $ 6.274.608.40 $__LA.SS ,081.'"'""'5;..M.6 __ This Change (ADD) (X}fx~}J~'(lX) $ ___ 7 ....... ,5_3_7_.s_o __ Amended Contract Price $ --2.i 7'10 '227. 46 :..AA- Approved: COUNTY SJ\NITATIO!J DISTRICTS of Orange County, Califo.rnia By __ ~~-----~--~~~~~-----M----~ C11ic1 Enr, 1nc District 2 C 0 U; n Y SA: JI TAT 1 0 :.: l) I ST I~ J CT~; 0 F 0 P.i \:: C E C 0 U:; TY J> • • 0 • Bo x 8 L-~ 7 -1 0 H .1 1 l E 11 i ~; , \ v en u c · F u·u n ta in Val l_c y, Ca 1 i r or n i a ~> 2 7 O 8 CllJ\>!GE OIWi~ R C. 0. ~\O. 10 DATE _.....;.-.... _______ _ OlffRACTOR: ~~S~11~J~Jry~-~~l-il-l~c~r_....C~o~n~tr~a~c~t~i~n~g~C~o~m~p~o1~1}~'~~~~~--September 12, 1973 Santa An~ River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 OB: __ ~----~~t~o:.._..4.lK~o~t~e~ll~~ . .!-!,A~v~c~n~u~c~.-C~o~n~t~1:·~n~c~t~N~o~.-2~-~l~4~--~l..__~~~~~----~~~~~~~~----~--- Amount of this Change Order (ADD) ·>!'\fXRx);{JA<;'(x~ $ _--.:2=..::s:....i.,...;:;.o.;:;..;o o~·:..;:o~o __ ~ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the ontrac t and/ or contract lvork arc hereby au th or i z e<l an<l as co1:1pcnsa t ion hcrcfor, the following a<l<litions to or dc<luctions from tbe contract price arc crcby approve<l. ... . · Reference: . Contractor's letter dated Scp~ember 6, 1973 ADD: The Contractor has been directed to provide·260-feet of 2600-D strength pipe and encasement concrete in order to provide ~uit­ able support for the proposed Slater-Segerstrom Bridge crossing of the Santa Ana River, to be built by the City of Fountain Valley in conjunction with the Orange Count~ Road Department. Work is being done at a lump sum figure of $25,000. · .· ADD TOTt;.L ADD ' .· Original Contract Pric-c P.rcv. Auth. Changes $ 25,000.00 $ . 2 5 , 0 0 0 , 0 O· $ 6, 27 4 , __ 6~0;:..;:8~.--4...._.0 __ _ $ _L, 4 6 s, 61_9_._0_6 _____ _ This Change (ADD) 6..QJx~<J;{xKY. $ ____ 2s._...-'-oo,;....;.o __ ._oo __ _ Bo al' d author i z at ion cl at e : September 12, 1973 i)' _________ _ Consulting Engineer Hy-----------~---:--t.011 tractor Agenda Item #48(c) Amended Con.tract Pr ic c $ 7,76~_27_._~_.6 __ ~~ ' -BB- .Approved: · COUI<TY SJ\NITATIO!~ DISTRICTS of Orannc County, California • (> By----------~-..---_._..----C hi c· f L n f~ in e e r Distric_t 2 . ....,, Lfro: ~ . ~\.. .j. :r. r ~ ,...,.. . .. .t__ l ... -~ ·-~~ ···· ·: ··. · incorporated 1888 orange civic center· 300 east chapman avenue· orange, califomia 92666 post office box 449 department of public works engineering division (714) 532-0444 August 27, 1973 County Sanitation District County of Orange P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Ray Lewis Chief Engineer Regarding: Tract #8149 Dear Mr. Lewis: It has been brought to our attention by Mr. Bruce Witcher of your office that Tract #8149, which is presently developing within the City of Orange, is proposed to be sewered by extending the just completed Santiago Canyon Road Sewer into the Tract. A problem is created according to·Mr. Witcher because the Santiago Canyon Road Sewer is in District #7 and Tract 0 #8149 is in DistriGt #2. We were, frankly, unaware of the difference in the two jurisdictions until ,·it was called to our attention, however when we submitted our plans to your office for review, we showed this area draining into thf District #7 line. Since physical terrain dictates for the most part how the land is sewered, I don't believe that the area south of the Santiago Creek can be sewered .from District #2 lines. A gravity flow system would be difficult if not impossible and a force main system may be required. At the time we submitted our plans for your review of the Santiago Canyon Road Sewer, we recognized this problem an·d showed the area in question to be directed toward our new District #2 sewer. .Agenda Item 1150 C9-l District 2 Mr. Ray Lewis Page 2 "'-"" August 27, 1973 We received no adverse connnents from your office and assumed that our Sewer Hydrology Study was acceptable. If this land cannot be sewered as proposed it could only be serviced by constructing a new line along the north side of the Santiago C_reek begin:- ning at our existing sewer located at Sycamore and Serrano Avenue, a distance· of approximately 2 miles. In light of prob.lems in crossing the creek, I would suggest that this area be deannexed from District #2 and included into District #7. It appears that this should have been done when the Districts were originally establish- ed. If this ip unfeasible, I would appreciate further meeting with you to discuss the problem since the tract was approved and is being constructed with the intent of sewering into our Santiago Canyon Road Sewer. We look forward to meeting with you at an early date to resolve this issue. 8 ry · . 1011 nSOI Cit ngf/eer GDJ:rh . ' . ·~ Agenda Item #50· .. CC-2 District 2 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Fred A. Harper, Gener.al Mana·ger Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 Santa Ana River Interceptor,-from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue -Contract No. 2-14-1 Work continues to progress on two headings. The north heading has now progressed to approximately 1,000-feet south of the end of the project at Katella. The Contractor still expects to reach Katella by the middle of the month. The River crossing and the wo.rk under the Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad bridge presented no problems. Restoration and landscaping of the levee section is progressing satisfactorily. The Distr~ct has coordinated some of.the landscaping with the County Green Belt Coordinator so that it fits into the overall plan for the River. On the south heading, work progressed satisfactorily until the Contractor reached Fifth Street. At this crossing a considerable amount of debris, rip-rap ~nd an old bridge abutment were encountered. In order to expedite the removal of this debris and concrete, the City of Santa Ana gave the Contractor permission to close.Fifth Street for two weeks. It is expected that two weeks will b~ more than enough to complete this cros5ing. The Southern Pacific Railroad has granted the Contractor permission to open ·cut the railroad tracks north of Fifth Street rather than tunnel under them. The Contractor will give approximately a weeks notice to the Railroad Company and Southern Pacific will then remove the tracks. Upon completion of the north heading, that crew will start another heading between Fifth Street and Seventeenth Street. This is necessary at this time due to the Flood Control District's requirement that work in this section of the levee be completed prior to October 15. 1973. Work is expected to commence at Plant No.' 1 on approximately October 1, 1973. REL:BEW:hjm Agenda Item #51· -DD-District 2 G\ z ·. --C~m;l e le ---To be CtJ /1 :3 ft·1.1c,/ed • • I •. CITY OF SAI\JT A ANA DEPARTrv1ENT OF PUUUC \VORKS 20 CIVIC (ENTER PLAZA • SANTA ANA • CALIFORNIA 92701 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester, Director of Finance Dear Sir: August 20, 1973 SUBJECT: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NUMBER 7 MAIN TRUNK FUND; CONSTRUCTION · OF WEST RELIEF TRUNK REACHES 19, 20 Al~D 22, CONTRACT ~IBER 7-5-lR; BO-MAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY; STOP NOTICE Reference your contract with Bo-Mar Construction Company for subject project, it is requested that you withhold $958.86 fr9m his progress payments. Bo-Mar owes the City for emergency repairs of streets, water mains, water servi~es; water meter rentals and water used, all in connection with your West Relief Trunk sewer~ Invoices and a.mounts are as follows: INVOICE NUMBER PW 3189 PW 3211 PW 3240 RP 0839 WT 2466 WT 2498 WT 2535 WT 2543 WT 2547 WT-2571 WT 2604 WT 2628 INVOICE DATE . January 18, 1973 February 9, 1973 March 21, 1973 December 29, 1972 December 29, 1972 January 8, 1973 February 9, 1973 February 9, 1973 February 20, 1973 March 8, 1973 April 9, 1973 April 30, 1973 Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated. INVOICE AMOUNT. $78.17 $54.24 $95-58 $:0.61 $:· 5. 00 ~15.50 $15.50 $172.50 $112.64 $14.oo $15.50 $349.62 If you have any questions, please call Art Newcomb at 834-4180. · ~cerly yours, · r,_/:( ~v /(/;t~ Ronald E. wo1;6:d Director of Public Work~ cc: Finance Depar~ment (Accounts Receivable Supervisor) Agenda Item 1156. -EE-District 7 cou;rry S,\:lITATICJ:~. l>I~;Ti:Jcrs OF O!·~,\~:(~E c:ou::TY p, o. I~ox ~n27 -l0~).1 1 l Elli!.J ,\v('nuc Fount a in Va 11 c y , Ca 1 i.f or n i a ~> 2 7 0 8 CI IJ\~~GE OIWER C. 0. ~\O. '.') CO:~TRACTOR: no-~Inr Construction Cornp:m._._ _______ _ DJ\TE ----""------· Sept cmb c :i:_.Ll...i_!. __ ~)_7..._3 __ _ JOB: \•.1cst Relief Trunk Sewer, Re~chcs 19, 20 and 22 -Contract No. 7-5-lR Amount· of. this Change Order. (ADD) ~'tl~IDG.l".~ $ 2,463.00 ---------- ~ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contra c t an <.l I or cont tact work arc h c r ch y author i z c <l an <l as c 01:1 pc n s at ion therefor, the following adtlitions to or deductions.from the contract.price arc hereby approved. . .. ADD Item No. Unit From To Dif fercnce 3 L.F. 7,324 7,331 7 11 L.F. 24 35 11 12 L.F. 24 35 11 13 · L. F. 124 143 19. 14: L.F. 124 143 19 DEDUCT Item No. Unit From To Difference . 1 , L.F. 2,692 . 2, 672 20 2 L.F. 3,690 3,671 19 4 L.F. 2,696 2,678 18 22 C.Y. 10 0 10 Unit Price $22.00 85.00 50.00 90.00 50.00 Unit Price $26.00 24.00 20.00 50.00 • TOTAL· ADD TOTAL DEDUCT $ 154. 00 935.00. 550. 00 . 1, 710. 00 . 950.00 $ 4 ,.299. 00 $ s20·.oo 456.00 360.00 500.00 $ 1,836.00 TOTAL ADD TIIIS CHANGE ORDER $ 2·,463.00 Board authorization elate:" September 12, 1973 • By ________ ,;___..,,..__.---n----~ Consulting Engineer By------------:;or---:-~~-:-:: Contractor Agenda Item #57(a) .Original Contract Price $ 4 72, 680. 00 Prev. Auth. Changcstts l&l $ 18.18 ~~~~~--~~ Thfs Change (ADD)}001rnki'x:XR) $ 2,463.00 Amended Contract Price S475,161.18 .-FF- ---- Approved: COUI\TY SJ\NITATIO?~ DISTRICTS of . Orange County, California By _______________ .._r:----.-- C hi cT l:np, 1nc, District'7 cou;ay SA:lITATio:.: nu;TJ~JCfS OF O!~,\::CE cou::TY P •. O. Box Bl27 -lu~>-H Elli!; ,\vc·nuc F .o u n ta in V .a 11 c y , Ca 1 i f o r n i a ~) 2 7 0 8 CllJ\~GE OIWER C .. 0. NO. 4 COi\rfl~ACTOR: J.}_Q_:-M~r Construction Compan..__ ________ _ DATE -------·--Sept ember 12 , 1~}73 JOB: West Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 19, 20 and 22 -Contract No. 7-5-IR Amount· of this Change Order X)\'001~ (DEDUCT) $ 18 ,500. 00 "-"" In accor<l;1nce with contract provisions, the following changes. in the contract an<l/or ci>ntract Hork arc hereby authorized and as c01:ipcnsation therefor, the fol lowing ad<li tions to or deductions .from the contract pric.c arc J10rcby approved. .. .. . A. For ·consideration, the District sl1all assume all liability for subsequent compaction and reconsolidation as ~eedcd in those areas described below in \vhich the contractor was relieved of his contractual obligations to.obtain the required compaction: Station 48+00 to 62+30 (At S.F.R.R. t.o ~lcFadden) Station 106+41 to 113+60 (S.A. F\.vy to 1st Street) Station 115+00 .to 123+35 (between 1st & 4th Sts.) Station 124+80 to 140+80 (between 4th & Fruit Sts.) Station 140+55 to 163+08 (Fruit St. & Tustin Ave.) Station 0+23 to 9+43 (West on Fruit Street) In all other areas where the compaction requirc~ents were obtained by the contractor, the District shall also assume . all future obligations f<?r c~mpaction and· reconso~idation rcqtiirements as needed. T~is change order .shall not be construed· to relieve the contractor of his performance bond and guarantee require- ments regarding the underground sewer system,_ a~purten?nces and other contr~ctual obligations. DEDUCT B. As provided for in Paragraph 7-6 of the General Pro'visions, the contractor is assessed liquidated damages in the mutually a~rced upon amount of $6, 000.. : DEDUCT TOTAL DEDUCT • Original Contract Price Prev. Au th. Changes 1 2 3 , ' $ 12,so·o.oo 6,000.00 $~ 472 ,680. 00 $ __ 2_._4_81..-;.._1_8 --- This Change >(XxlxtH (DEDUCT) $--1.§_,_5_00_._oc_J __ _ • Board authorization date: September 12, 1973 By-------~---r~-~~·~~ Consulting Engineer ~y------------------------~c~o~n~t~r~a~c~t~o~x~~ Agenda Item #57(b) Amended Contract Price $ 456 J 661.18 · -GG- Approved: COUNTY SJ\NITATIO!J DISTRICTS of . Orange County, California By ____ ~--~------~--_,..._.....__,.~r-------Clu c· f Enr,1nc District 7 cou;ay SA:lf'L\TlO>; IJI~;Ti:rcrs OF Ol'.1\.':GE c:ou::TY P • 0 • I~ ox 8 1 2-7 -ll.1 '"; · l · l I: 11 i ~ , \ v e 11 u c Fountain v.~~11.ey, Califonlia ~2708 Clli\~~GE OIWER C. 0. !\O. s DATE --.:.--------co;\'f RACTOR: Bo-Mar Construction Company September 12, 1973 JOB: \'!est Relief Trunk Sewer, Rea'ches 19, 20 and 22 -Contract No. 7-5-lR Amount of this Change o·r<lcr. (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 0.00 ~ In accord.-1ncc with contract provisions, the following changes in the cont r a c t an <.l I or c : n t r a c t h' o r k a r c h c r c by author i ;: c <l an <l 3 s co 1:t pc n s a t i o i1 therefor, the folJ.oHing additions to or deductions from tho contrac.t price are hereby approved. · ... The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of time·. due to inclement weather For the consideration mutually agreed upon in Change Order No. 4, Paragraph .B, the Contractor is he!cby granted an extension of time 60 calendar days 84 calendar days TOTAL TIME" EXTENSION 144 calendar <lays SUMMARY .OF CONTRACT"TIME: Original Contract Date Otiginal Contract Time. Original Completion Date Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date Board authorization date: September 12, 1973 By _______ -:---~-..--"\"T---~~ Consulting E1q~ inc er By----------~r-~---=-:~ Co11tractor Agenda Item. #57 ( c) September 28, 1972 180 Calendar Days March 26, 1973 324 calendar days August 17, 1973 Original Contract Price Prev. Au th. Chanecs 1 ,2 ,3 $ 472,680.00 $ (16, 01s. a2) This Cha nee (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 0.00 Amcrtded Contract Price $ 456,661.18 ·-HH- Approved: COUNTY SJ\NITATIO?~ DISTRICTS of . Orange County, California By----------~-...,...-,...r----:--: Clnc-f tn~! inc District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 73-141-7 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-5-lR AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT .NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-5-lR AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the. c~:mtractor, Bo-Mar Construction Company, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for the WEST RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, REACHES 19, 20 & 22, CONTRACT NO. 7-5-lR, on the 17th da~ of August, 1973; and, Section 2. That by letter, Boyle Engineering Corporation, District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contra·ct; · and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has con- curred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the West Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 19, 20 & 22, Contract No. 7-5-lR, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 28th day of September, 1972; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Bo-Mar Construction Company setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of said West Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 19, 20 & 22, Contract No. 7-5-lR, is hereby approved; and, Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Dire~tors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1973. Agenda Item #58 -II-District 7 . ··.·· ' COUNTY SANITATION DiSTRIC'T NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY ( SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT'S TRUNK SEWER. CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ~ ~ <D PROJECT TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST ~ p, p, H DIVERSION FACILITIES rt $39,000 (!) 3 TJSTIN -ORANGE TRUNK ~ r::::ACHES 10, 11 8. PORTION 12 \.J1 $1,253,000 \.0 I y y I TiJSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK :=:::ACHES PORTION 12 ,13,14, 15, !6 B PORT:ON 17 $ 1,062,000 "1'"JSTl~J-ORANGE TRUNK REACH 18 SOJTH IRVINE LIFT STATION . $347,000 $ !66:000 SCUTH !RViNE SUBTRUNK $ ~C::~C.H 23 180,000 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~-- TOTAL $ 3, 047, 000 ~OTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST INCLUDES · CO\lSTRUCTI ON, ENGINEERING, SURVEYING , :~:SPECTiON, ADMINISTRATIVE, LEGAL AND ~.~iSCELLANEOUS COSTS. !" {REMAINING 1969 MASTER PLAN FACILITIES) 1973 1974 !i, l I I I I DESIGN. I CONSTRUCTION I I 1 -----........ ---~.__-1 -! I I : PRELIMINARY : ! I j i I ! 1 · 'j I I I. I i I I : I I ,, I I I I I I I I ! I i · l I i" i PRELIMINARY EN.GIN ERING1----._ I I I I j I· i : I ! t I l : i I I I i I I I I I j I I ! i i . j ! ' i ! f \ i. , I. 11 l i . I I I 1 I. l l I I I CONSTRUC ION r j. '. --IDESIGN~ • DESIG : I i I I ' ' I I ! . I ; I 1975 CONSTRUCTION . CCON!TRUCTIONI ' CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION ,,,. I i ! ••. i '' BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP , 197 6 J A ? . I. I\ I 11" I t,... ...- .. ® EJDLJ/e Enc;ineerina Corporation 412 South Lycn Street P.O. Box 178 Santa Ana. California 92702 Mr. Fred A. Harper, Gener~ I Manager COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 . OF ORANGE COUNTY Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention Mr. Ray E. Lewis Chief Engineer Diversion Facilities consultlnq ,C?nqtneers / architects 714 I 54 7-44 71 September 6, 1973 In response to Mr. Lewis's request, we submit the following.proposal for engineering ser- vices to prepare plans and specificatio.ns and to provide construction staking for certain- diversion facilities in the nori-herly part of the district. The diversion facilities consist of four separate projects. Three of these projects will re- lieve the Foothi II-Newport subtrunk in Foothi II Boulevard between Newport Avenue and Arroyo Avenue and the Lemon ·Heights trunk in Southeast Skyline Avenue between Arroyo Avenue and Red Hi 11 Avenue. Both of these sections are flowing at capacity. It was an- . ticipated these conditions would occur and, therefore, paralleling relief facilities were included in the master plan. However, as reported to the board at their adjourned July 31 meei'ing, ~ignificant savings can be realized if local .collection facilities are uf'ilized in conjunction with new diversion facilities on Foothill Boulevard. These diversion fa- cilities consist of approximately 400 feet of 8-inch sewer in Newport Avenue south of Foothi 11 Bou fevard and f·he rcmode I ing of two manholes, insta If at ion of approximately 270 feet of 8-inch sewer in Newport Avenue south of La Loma Drive with ~anhole remodeling, and insta.llation of approximately 120 feet of 8-inch sewer in Newport Avenue south of La Colina Drive with manhole remodeling. Total estimated consfTuction cost of·diversion. facilities "is $25,000. The estimated construction cost of paralleling relief facilities is $63,000; thus, a $38,000 ~aving using the diversion facilities plan. The remaining diversion project wi 11 temporarily relieve the Norf·h Trunk. It is. proposed to consf-ruct approximately 445 feet of8-inch sewer in Fairhaven Avenue southerly of Hewes Avenue and diverf· flows through the subtrunk S}'stem to the Lemon Heights trunk, which at the present f'ime has excess capaciiy for several years. This new 8-inch sewer Agenda Item #60 · KK-1 District 7 ... -, ·Mr. Fred A. Harper -2-Sept.ember 6, 1973 con also serve as a local sewer to presently undeveloped properties which front along it. As connections are mode, the usua I connection charge and front-footage charges wi II be levied, enabling the district to eventually regain most of the estimated $8,000 construc- tion cost. Total estimated construction cost of all four facilities is, therefore, $33,000. . . Our fee for preparing plans and specifications for a II the diversion faci1 ities wi 11 be a lump-sum amount of $2,645. We propose that the field surveys required for plans and specifications, as well as construction staking and as-built conditions, be performed on a per diem basis at $57 per hour for a three-man survey crew, $41 per hour for a two- man survey crew, and $22 an hour for a I icensed surveyor. We are ready to proceed with the work upon receiving authorization. BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION {1-yi/c-eLtrJd.../u,ru-~9 / Conrad Hohener, Jr., PE Principal Civil Engineer sk Agenda Item #60 KK-2 District 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 DISTRICT NO. 1 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 2 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 3 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 5 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 6 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 7 Directors present: Dire·ctors absent: DISTRICT NO. 11 Directors present: Direct9rs absent: MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING September 12, 1973 ~ 7:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California ROLL CALL · Directors Robert Battin (Chairman pro tern)~ John Garthe, Kerm Rima, and Donald Saltarelli None Directors Robert Nevil (Chairman), Dale Chaput, Ralph Clark, Norman Culver, Robert Finnell, Thomas Ko~alski, John Garthe, Edward Just, Robert Root, Don Smith, Mark Stephenson, and Donald Winn None Directors Donald Fox (Chairman), Robert Battin, Thomas Blackman, Norman Culver, Jesse Davis, Roland Edwards, John Garthe, Jack Green, Joseph Hyde, Frank Marshott; Henry Roberts, Jr., Robert Root, George Scott, Mark Stephenson, Charles Stevens; Jr., and Cor Vanderwaal None Director~ Don Mcinnis (Chairman) and Carl Kymla Director Ronald Caspers Directors Ellis Porter (Chairman), Robert Battin, and John Store None Directors Don Smith (Chairman), Ralph Clark, John Garthc, Ellis Porter, .Don Mcinnis, and Donald Saltarelli Director E. Ray Quigley Dire~tors Henry Duke (Chairman) and Norma Gibbs Director David Baker 9/12/73 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Se9retary, Ray Lewis, Ted Dunn, William Ciarke, Robert Webber, Rita Brown, and Carol Fontenot C. Arthur Nisson, Con Bliss, Conrad Hohener, Harvey Hunt, Milo Keith, James Maddox, Donald Martinson, Garvin Shallenberger, Jack Guiso, and Bob Casey A regular meeting of the Boardri of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at 7:30 p.m. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation, the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District's Board. DISTRICT 1 Appointment of Chairman pro tern Chairman Patterson. ALL DISTRICTS Adopting Resolution of Commendation for retiring Director Clifton C. Miller * * * * * * * * * Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Director Battin be appointed Chairman pro tern in the absence of Joint Chairman Finnell read a letter from Clifton C. Miller announcing his retirement from the Boards and expressing appreciation for the association enjoyed with Directors of the Joint Sanitation Districts during his many years on the Boards. It was then moved, seconded, and duly carried: That said letter, dated September 7 '· 1973, be received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 73-146, commending Clifton C. Miller for his outstanding contribution to public service as a Diredtor. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 The office of Chairman having been Election of Chairman vacated by the resignation of · . Clifton C. Miller, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the office of Chairman of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7. It was then moved and seconded that Directors Don Smith and Donald Saltarelli be nominated as candidates for the office of Chairman. There being no further nominations, the vote was polled by the General Counsel who announced that Director Smith had been elected Chairman. ~ . DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held August 8, 1973, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held August 8, 1973, be &pproved as mailed. -2- 9/12/73 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held August 8, 1973, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minut~s of the regular meeting held August 8, 1973, be approved as mail~d. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held August 8, 1973, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held August 8, 1973, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held August 8, 1973, be approved as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Appointment of Alternate Commissioner to SCCWRP Joint Chairman Finnell announced that with the resignation of Clifton C. Miller, the Districts' post of alternate representative to the Commission of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, was now vacant. Following a brief discussion, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Director Henry Duke.be appointed as Alternate Commissioner to the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. ALL DISTRICTS Cons1deration of Commissioner to SCCWRP Following a brief discussion concerning the propriety of the Districts' Commissioner to the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project being a Director of the Joint Boards, it was moved that the Districts' post of 'commissioner to the South~rn California Coastal Water Research Project be declared vacant. The motion failed for lack of a second. ALL DISTRICTS Report of' the Joint Chairman The Joint Chairman re~orted that on October 1st he and the General Manager were scheduled to meet with EPA officials John Quarles, Assistant Administrator, and Robert Sansom, Deputy Assistant Administrator, regarding the definition of best practicable waste treatment technology for ocean dischargers presently being formulated by the Environmental Protection· Agency. The meeting is a follow-up of the July conferences of governmental representatives on municipal discharges to the Pacific Ocean held in San Francisco and Hawaii. The Chairman reported that officials f~om Hawaii, Alaska, Washington, and California will attend the Washington, D. C. meeting. Our staff has conducted extensive testing and is preparing a report to support the Districts' positi"n suggesting a definition that will protect the marine environment with a reasonable expenditure of public funds and commitment of resources. Joint Chairman Finnell then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for 5:30 p.m., Tuesday, September 25, 1973, and invited Directors Blackman and Kowalski to attend and participate in the discussions. -3- 9/12/73 ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager· reported further Report of the on the test work on physical-chemical General Manager treatment which has been conducted by the staff. Results indicate that the Districts can meet the proposed Environmental Protection Agency standards with the exception of the oxygen depletion (BOD) requirement. If it is not possible to obtain an exemption for ~ ocean water dischargers on the BOD requirement, the.Districts will concentrate their efforts on obtaining a realistic definition of best practicable treatment technology for deep ocean water dischargers. Mr. Harper reported on the activities of the Alternate Fuel Source Committee, a joint study with the County Road Department and other interested agencies. The Committee is finalizing requests for proposals for a feasibility study utilizing solid wastes and sewage sludge as a fuel source to generate electricity. The Manager reported that a recent legal opinion by Environmental Protection Agency attorneys would apparently eliminate the Districts from eligibility for up to $3 million in reimbursable grant funds for projects constructed from 1966 through 1971. The 1972 Water Pollution Control Act Amendments allocated $1.9 billion for reimbursement; but as a result of the EPA ruling, apparently only those states having construction programs involving state financial assfstance such as New York, Pennsylvania, and Michigan will be eligible. Our staff has been working with Congressional representatives and with the State Board and will continue to strive for a more favorable ruling. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Counsel The General Counsel reported on his communications with the Bank of America regarding their efforts to unilaterally increase fees for processing payment of maturing in~erest and bond coupons on several of the various Districts'· outstanding general oblig&tion bonds. He has informed the bank that the Districts could not legally agree to such an increase. With regard to the consolidation of District No. ~ into District No. 3 presently under proceedings, Mr. Nissan advised that recent adoption of Assembly Bill 2008 will apparently restrict the tax rate that may be levied by the consolidated District for the territory which is now District No. 4. A clarification of the legislation will be necessary because District 4's tax rate is approximately six cents less that that of District 3. The General Counsel advised that he would keep the Boards apprised of developments regarding the effect of AB 2008 on the consolidation. Following a general discussion of the Boards and the Counsel regarding the date for which connection fees become effective under the recently adopted connection fee ordinancef; of Districts Nos. 2 and 3, Mr. Nissen advised that the language of the respective ordinances states that fees are due upon "issuance" of the building permit and that it would cause considerable confusion and difficulty to change the provision. -4- ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing attendance at Water Pollution Control Federation Conference in Cleveland 9/12/73 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the General Manager be authorized to designate one staff member to attend the Water .Pollution.Control Federation Conference in Cleveland, Ohio, Septem~er 30 -October 5, 1973; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging, and incidental expenses incurred for attendance at said conference is hereby authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing payment to Southern California Edison Company re Job No. Pl-16 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That payment to Southern California Edison Company for engineering design in connection with installation of 66kv to a 12kv substation to serve 46 MGD Activated Sludge Plant at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-16, be authorized, in an amount not· to exceed $3, 500. 00. ALL DISTRICTS Awarding Printing of General Provisions and Standard Specifications, Specification No. P-002' Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the bid tabulation and recommenda- tion for Printing of General Provisions and Standard Specifications, Specifica- tion No. P-002, be received and ordered ·filed, and that the General Manager be authorized to issue a purchase order to R. H. Landin Graphics in the amount of $5,255.48. ALL DISTRICTS Awarding purchase of Bar Screen Chain, Specification No. E-Obg Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the bid tabulation and recommenda- tion for Bar Screen Chain, Specification No. E-069, be received and ordered filed, and that the General Manager be authorized to issue a purchase order to Power Products Cocipany, agent for Moline Corp., in the amount of $7,460.00. ALL DISTRICTS Rejecting bids to Rebuild NQ. 1 Engine at Plant No. 1, Specification No. PW-031, and ordering work done by Districts' forces Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 73-130, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation to Rebuild No. 1 Engine at Plant No. 1, Specification No. PW-031, rejecting a11- bids, and. directing that said work be accomplished by utilization of Districts' forces. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Authorizing purchase of Replacement Expansion Joints, Specification No. E-070 That the General Manager be authorized to advertise and award purchase to the lowest responsible"bidder for Three (3) Replacement Expansion tion No. E-070, in an and freight. ALL DISTRICTS Convene in executive session Joints at Plant No. 1 Headworks, Specifica- amount not to exceed $3,300.00, plus tax At 8:04 p.m. the Boards convened in executive session to consider matters re litigation on Ocean Outfall No. 2, Job No. J-10 . . -5- 9/12/73 ALL DISTRICTS Reconvene in regular session ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing General Manager to request proposal from John Carollo Engineers for preparation of project report for 75 MGD advanced treatment expansion at Plant No. 2 At 8:24 p.m. the Boards reconvened in regular session. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the General Manager be authorized to request a proposal from John Carollr Engineers for preparation of a project~ report· for 75 MGD advanced treatment expansion at Plant N~. 2, as required by the State Water Resources Control Board in connection with grant approval for 1973-74 fiscal year projects, to be submitted to the Executive Committee for study and recommendation to the Joint Boards. ALL DISTRICTS Report of Special Committee and authorizing engagement of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & .Co. to conduct study on Feasibility of EDP System Dire-0tor Stevens, Chairman of the Special Committee on Feasibility of Electronic Data Processing Systems reviewed the activities of his Committee, the Committee recommends that consideration-of electronic data processing for the Districts be divided into two phases. Chairman Stevens outlined the scope of Phase I which would consist of an objective study and recommendation by an independent consultant on the Districts' EDP requirements. Phase II, if appropriate, would then consist of design and implementation of the consultant's recommendations. The Committee further recommended that the firm of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. be engaged by the Joint Boards of Directors to conduct the Phase I study and make recommendations on electronic data processing for the Districts. Following a discussion of the intent of the consultant's study and the various alternatives to which the consultant would address himself, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: . That the report and recommendation of the Special Committee on Feasibility of Electronic Data Processing System, dated September 12, 1973, be received, ordered filed, and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the firm of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., Certified Public Accountants, be engaged to conduct a study and make recommendations on the feasibility of electronic data processing for the Districts, on a per diem fee basis for a maximum amount riot to ex.ceed $10,300; and, FURTHER MOVED: That Committee members Charles Stevens, Jr., Don Mcinnis, and Robert Root be commended for an outstanding job. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file letters re underground utility rights of way Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the following letters received in response to communication of the Joint Chairman regarding the Districts' position on proposed legislation to give cities discretion re underground utility rights of wa~ be received and ordered filed: From Senator Dennis E. Carpenter Assemblyman Kenneth Cory City of Irvine City of Yorba Linda -6- Dated August 18, 1973 August 10, 1973 August 8, 1973 .-August 8, 1973 ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file letter from Orange County Water Management Agency 9/12/73 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the letter from Orange County Water Management Agency dated July 22, 1973, be received, ordered filed, and referred to the Executive Committee for study and recommendation. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file staff progress report on Treatment Plant Construction Projects ALL DISTRICTS Certification of the General Manager received and ordered filed Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff progress report dated September 6, 1973, on Treatment Plant Construction Projects be received and ordered filed. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the· certification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for pay~ent, be received and ordered filed.- ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded, and duly carried by roll call vote: . . . Approval of Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant books That the Districts' Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant books be approved for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay: · Joint Operating $162,258.87 344,547.88 Capital Outlay Revolving $506,806.75 in accordance with the warrants listed on pages "I-1" through "I-3", attached hereto and made .a PC3:rt of these·minutes. DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Approval Gf Suspense Fund· warrants Moved; seconded, and duly carried: That the Districts' Suspense Fund warrant book ·be approved for signature of the Chairman of District No. 3, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $29.56, in accordance with the war,rants listed on Page "III", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then· declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:49 p.m., September 12, 1973. DISTRICTS 2 & 3 Moved, seconded, aqd duly carried: .Approving and authorizing execution of Standard That the Boards of Directors adopt the ·Agreements with cities following resolutions approving and authorizing execution of Standard ~ Agreements for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges with the respective cities. City Anaheim Orange Villa Park District 2 No. 73-142-2 No. 73-131-2 No. 73-132-2 District 3 No. 73-143-3 Certified copy of these resolutions are attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -7- 9/12/73 DISTRICTS 2 & 3 Approving Supplement to Standard Agreements with cities Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors adopt the ·following resolutions approving Supplement to Standard Agreements for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges with cities, incorporating nhold harmless" provisions, as recommended by the General Counsel. District 2 District 3 Anaheim Orange Villa Parl{ No. 73-144-2 No. 73-133-2 No. 73-134-2 No. 73-145-3 Certified copy of these resolutions are attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 2 & 3 Authorizing modification of Standard Agreements to allow for collection of sewer connection charges by other than cities The General Manager reported that agreements had been approved by all cities within the Districts with the exception of three.· The Districtn have been advised that the matter will appear on the next Westminster City Council agenda with a staff recommendation for approval. The cities of Garden Grove and Stanton have advised that they would prefer the Garden Grove Sanitary District and the Stanton County Water District· to collect the fees, respectively, in those cities. Following a brief discussion of the alternatives, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff be authorized to modify the Standard Agreement for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges, in form approved by the General Counsel, to allow for collection of said fees by the Garden Grove Sanitary District and the Stanton County Water District. DISTRICT 3 Authorizing initiation of roceedin s to annex territory to the District Proposed annexation No. 3D - Uninhabited -Balsa Chica Road Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 3 Moved, ~econded, and duly carried: That .the Board of Directors adopt .Standard Resolution No. 73-135-3, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately. 103.8 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the U. S. Naval Ammunition Depot at Bolsa Chica Road and Westminster Avenue (Proposed Annexation No. 3D -Uninhabited -Balsa Chica Road Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 3.) Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Authorizing initiation of proceedin~s to annex territor to the District Proposed . Annexation No. 3E -Inhabited - Bol~a Chica Road Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 73-136-3, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 53.6 acres of territory to the ~istrict in the vicinity of th~ U. S. Naval Ammunition Depot at Balsa Chica and Westminster Avenue (Proposed Annexation No. 3E -Inhabited -Bolsa Chica Road Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 3). Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -8- DISTRICT 3 Receive and file staff progress reports re 3-17, 3-17-1, and 3-18 9/12/73 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the ~taff pro~ress reports dated September 5, 1973, on construction of the Knott Interceptor, C6ntract No. 3-17; the Bolsa Relief Trunk Sewer and Bolsa Avenue Storm Drain, Contract No. 3-17-1; and the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-19, be received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: .Approval of Suspense Fund warrants That the Districts' Suspense Fund warrant book be approved for signature of the Chairman of District No. 3, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $317,054.61, in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II-1", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of warrants That the District's Operating Fund. and Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund warrant books be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be auth.orized and directed to pay: Operating Fund $ 25.06 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 31,598.46 $31,623.52 in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II-1", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Approving and authorizing execution of Standard Agreement with ·City of Seal Beach Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 73-147-3, approving and authorizing execution of Standard Agreement for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges of this resolution minutes. with the City of Seal Beach. Certified copy is attached hereto and made a part of these DISTRICT 3 Approving Supplement to Standard Agreement with City of Seal Beach Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 73-148-3, approving Supplement to Standard Agreement for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges with the City of Seal Beach. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 2 & 3 Receive and file letter from Garden Grove Sanitary District re connection fees Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the letter from Garden Grove Sanitary District dated September 11, 1973, declaring their intent to enter into agreements with the respective Districts to collect connection fees within the City of Garden Grove, be received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 3 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:53 p.m., September 12, 1973. -9- 9/12/73 DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 5 to plans and That Change Order No. 5 to the.plans specifications for and specifications for Sewer Trunk Contract No. 5-19 "B" -Unit 8 -Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-19, authorizing an addition of $47,751.00 to the contract with A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Co., a Joint Venture, be approved. Copy of this Change Order is attached hereto ~ and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Approving Change Order No. 6 to plans and specifications· for Contract No. 5-19 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Sewer Trunk "B" -Unit 8 -Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-19, granting an extension of time of 42 calendar days to the contract with A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Co., a Joint Venture, be approved. Copy of this Chahge.Order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Accepting Contract No. 5-19 as complete That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 73-137-5, accepting Sewer Trunk "B" -Unit 8 -Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-19, as ~omplete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of Suspense Fund warrants That the Districts' Suspense Fund warrant book be approved for signature of the Chairman of District No. 5, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $56,574.00, in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II-2", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of warrants That the District's Operating Fund and Facilities Revolving Fund warrant books be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay: Operating Fund $ 297.50 Facilities Revolving Fund 165,480.39 $165,777.89 in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II-1", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. · DISTRICri1 5 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m., September 12, 1973. -10- DISTRICT 6 Adjournment 9/12/73 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m., September 12, 1973. DISTRICT 11 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and.duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m., September 12, 1973. DISTRICT 2 Receive and file communication from City of Anaheim re Contract No. 2-14-2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Minute Excerpt from the City of Anaheim dated August 17, 1973, approving District's Environmental Impact Statement re Santa Ana River · Interceptor Sewer, from Contract No. 2-14-2, be Katella Averiue to La Palma Avenue, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 2 Receive and file communication from City of Placentia re Master Plan Sewer Facilities the City of Placentia, be DISTRICT 2 Authorizing execution of agreement with Southern Pacific Transportation Company re Contract No. 2-14-2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the communication and resolution from the City of Placentia dated Atlgust 23, 1973, approving route selections for District's Master Plan Sewer Facilities located within received and ordered filed. Moved, seconded~ and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 73-138-2, authorizing execution of agreement· with Southern Pacific Transportation Company for crossing under Southern Pacific right of way south of Ball Road, in connection with construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, from Xatella Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No·. 2-14-2. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Authorizing execution of agreement with City of Fountain Valley re Following a brief report by the General Counsel, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: Slater-Segerstrom Bridge That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 73-139-2, authorizing execution of agreement in· form approved by General Counsel, with City of Fountain Valley to accommodate construction of the Slater~Segerstrom Bridge over the District's Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No. 2-14-1, at a cost not to exceed $4,500; and rescinding Resolution No. 73-36-2. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto an~ made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Approving Change Order No. 8 to plans and specifications for Contract No. 2-14-1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 8 to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No .. l.to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, authorizing an addition of $11,434.oo, be approved. Copy of this Change Order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ~11- 9/12/73 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 9 to plans and specifications That Change Order No. 9 to the plans for Contract No. 2-14-1 and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, authorizing an addition of $7,537.50 to the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting Company, be approved. Copy of this Change Order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ~ DISTRICT 2 Approving Change Order No. 10 to plans and specifications for Contract No. 2-14-1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 10 to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 an addition Contracting is attached to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, authorizing of $25,000.00 to the contract with Sully-Miller Company, be approved. Copy of this Change Order hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Accepting Grant of Easement from San Diego Pipeline Compan~ That the Board of Directors adopt re Contract No. 2-14-2 Re~oltltion No. 73-140-2, authorizing acceptance of Grant of Easement from San .Diego Pipeline Company for a permanent easement in connection with construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Katella -Avenue to La Palma Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-2, and approving payment in the amount of $3,500 for said Easement. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made.a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Receive and file lett~r from City of Orange re Tract 8149 sewering Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the letter from the City of Orange dated August 27, 1973, requesting that Tract No. 8149 in District No. 2 be served through facilities located within District No. 7, be rec~ived, ordered filed, and referred to the staff for study and recommendation. DISTRICT 2 Receive and file staff progress report re Contract No. 2-14-1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff progress report dated September 5, 1973, on construction of the·santa Ana River Intercepto~ . from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, be received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of warrants That the District's Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund warrant book be approved for signature of the Chairman, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay $1,319,713.71, in accordance with the warrants listed on page "II-1", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of .the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:00 p.m., September 12, 1973. -12- DISTRICT 7 Receive and file Stop Notice from J. B. Crosby Co., Inc. re Contract No. 7-5-lR 9/12/73 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Stop Notice submitted by J.B. Crosby Co., Inc. against Bomar Construction Company, Contractor for West Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 19, be received 20 & 22, Contract No. 7-5-lR, in the amount of $1,500.00 and· ordered filed. DISTRICT 7 Receive and file letter from City of Santa Ana re Contract No. 7-5-lR Bomar Construction Company, Sewer, Reaches 19, 20 & 22, and ordered filed. DISTRICT 7 Approving Change Order No. 3 to plans and specifications for Contract No. 7-5-lR Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the letter dated August 20, 1973, from the City of Santa Ana regarding unpaid obligations owed the City by Contractor for West Relief Trunk Contract No. 7-5-lR, be received Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for West Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 19, 20, & 22, Contract No. 7-5-lR, authorizing an addition of $2,463.00 to the contract with Bomar Construction Company, be approved. Copy of this Change Order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Approving Change Order No. 4 to·plans and specifications for Contract No. 7-5 lR Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for the West Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 19, 20, & 22, Contract No. 7-5-lR, authorizing a deduction of $18,500.00 to the contract with Bomar Construction Company, be approved. Copy of this Change Order is attached hereto and made a part of these min~tes. DISTRICT 7 Approving Change Order No. 5 to plans and specifications for Contract No. 7-5-lR Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for the West Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 19, 20 & 22, Contract No. 7-5-lR, granting a time extension of 144 calendar days to the contract with Bomar Construction Company, be . approved. Copy of this Change Order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Accepting Contract No. 7-5-lR as complete That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 73-141-7, accepting West Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 19, 20 & 22, Contract No. 7-5-lR, as complete and authorizing execution.of a Notice of Completion upon receipt of letters of permit compliance from the Cities of Santa Ana and Tustin; and approving final Closeout Agreement. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -13- 9/12/73 DISTRICT 7 Report on scheduling of remaining Master Plan facilities The Chief Engineer reviewed for the Board the remaining facilities to be constructed to complete the District's. Master Plan of Trunk Sewers. A recent study of flows in certain facilities has indicated that the Districts can best utilize the existing trunk and subtrunk sewers by construction of diversion facilities at several locations. Mr. Lewis also recommended that the District proceed with preliminary engineering"-' to establish the alignments of the remaining Master Plan facilities and obtain concurrence of the cities in which construction will take place in order that design of the sewers can proceed on schedule. DISTRICT 7 Accepting proposal of Boyle Engineering Corp. re Diversion Facilities, Contracts 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, and 7-3E-l After the report of the Chief Engineer on remaining Master Plan Trunk Sewers, the Board entered into a brief discussion regarding the proposed diversion facilities. It. was then moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the proposal of Boyle Engineering Corporation, dated September 6, 1973, for engineerin·g services in connection with preparation of plans and specifications for Diversion Facilities, Cont~acts No.s 7-3A-l, 7-3A-2, 7-3B-l, and 7-3E-l, be accepted; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be authorized to direct .the engineers to proceed with said work for a basic fee of $2,645.00; and, That payment for work such as field survey for design and construction sta~ing is pereby authorized to be made in accordance with the following per diem rates contained in the proposal: 3-Man Survey Crew $57.00 per hour 2-Man Survey Crew 41.00 per hour Licensed Surveyor 22.00 per hour DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of warrants That the District's Operating Fund and Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund warrant books be approved for . signature of the Chairman of· District No. 7, and that the · County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay: Operating Fund $ 129.52 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 8,961.57 $9 '091. 09 in accordance with the warrants listed on page "III", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of ~ Directors be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:08 p.m., September 12, 1973. -14- WARRANT NO. 21038 21039 2104J f"'>1J41 ~J42 21043 . 21044 "21045 '21046 ;21047 • 21048 21049 2105J 21051 21052 21053 21054 21055 21056 21J57 21058 21059 21060 21061 21J62 21063 21064 21065 21066 21067 21068 21069 21070 21071 21072 21073 21074 21239 21075 21076 21077 21078 21079 21080 21081 >21082 ·2l·J83 21084 t21085 21086 21087 21088 21089 21090 ;91 ~092 21093 21094 21095 21096 21097 21098 21099 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF AAA Fremont Bag & Salvage, Sand Bags $ Alex Fish Co., Ecological Research Supplies All Bearing Service, Inc., Compressor Parts American Compre·s sor, Compressor Pa rt s City of Anaheim, Power The Anchor Packing Company, Pump Packing Armstrong Environmental Industries, Hardware Bank of America, Bond & Coupon Collection Beckman Instruments, Inc., Electronic Parts Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams Business & Institutional Furniture Co., Shelving Cals Cameras, Inc., Photo Supplies Cal State Seal Company, Gaskets California Auto Collision, Inc., Truck Repair John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services College Lumber Company, Inc., Building Materials Commercial & C.B. Communications, Communications Equipment Consolidated Electrical Distr., Electrical Supplies Constructors Supply Company, Tools & Hardware Control Specialists, Inc., Regulator & Parts Costa Mesa County Water District, Water County of Orange, Maps Mr. Crane, Crane Rental Crest Leasing Corp., Leased Vehicles Cylcone Excelsweld Company, Engine Repair Daily Pilot, Employment Ad & Bid Notice P-002 Decker Instrument Supply Co., Controls DeGuelle & Sons Glass Co., Glass Nick DiBenedetto, Employee Mileage Ducommun Metals & Supply Co., Steel Eastman, Inc., ·office Supplies & Equipment Ecomatics, Pump Parts Electronic Business Machi~es, Office Supplies Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring (MO 12-14-66) Engine & Compressor Supply Co., Parts Ensign Products Company, Lube Oil· Enterprise Printing Co., Printing Robert F. Finnell, Sec .. Treatment Meeting (MO 6-13-73) Fischer & Porter Company, Chlorinator Parts Fisher Controls Company, Regulator Parts Foss Company, Foam System France Products Division, Engine Parts Fredson, Equipment Parts · Larry Fricker Company, Inc., Weed Killer Gar Wood-Los Angeles Truck Equip., Inc., Seals Garden Grove Lumber & Cement, Building Materials General Telephone Company .. Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine & Odor Control Graybar Electric Company, Electric Supplies Hardware Systems Co., Lab Supplies Harlows Clocks, Time Repair Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting & COD Expenses Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc., Pipe Supplies Hertz Car Leasing Division, Leased Vehicles Hewlett Packard, Lab Supplies Honeywell, Inc., Metering Supplies & Strip Charts Howard Supply Com9any, Pipe Supplie~ City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Beach EquiDment Rentals, Equipment Rental Imperial First Aid Supply Co., First Aid Supplies Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware Int'l. Business Machines Corp., Office Supplies Johnston Pump Compnny, Pump Repair (MO 6-13-73) I-1 AMOUNT 139.2:) 106.0J 235.68 762.67 15.0J 23.37 175.76 538.51 34.89 50.JO 81.47 61.14 92.61 491.62 636.10 193.18 97.2C) 1,029. 71 297.10 208.19 6.JO 44.34 l,448.4J 147.28 224.75 38.37 84.81 8.71 100.14 171.47 294.50 48.97 31.80 2,400.JO 6.25 244.81 17.81 77.0:) 623.38 886. l~O 21.20 127.20 8.99 111.30 16.18 544.84 2,2:03.53 5,351.92 31.80 242.85 47.99 159.88 158. 5:) 433.48 41.34 387 .65 1,337.24 34.65 357. 75 16.06 24.9.3 38 .16 7,211.92 WARRANT NO. 21100 21101 21102 21103 21104 21105 21106 21107 21108- 21109 21110 21111 21112 21113 21114 211.15 21116 21117 21118 21119 21120 21121 21122 21123 ·21124 21125 21126 21127 21128 21129 21130 21131 211.32 21133 21134 21135 21136 21137 21138 21139 2114:) 2111n 2111-1-2 21143 21144 21145 21146 21147 21148 21149 21150 21151 21152 21153 21154 21155 21156 21157 21158 21159 21160 21161 21162 21163 21164 IN FAVOR OF Kahl Scientific Instrument Corp., Ihstrmentation $ Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supplies King Bearing, Inc.~ Seals Kleen Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware Kontes~of California, Lab Supplies Kressilk Products, Inc., Conveyor Parts LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Hardware & Tools L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Service The Lacal Company, Inc., Cleaner Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Equipment Parts Judy Lee, Employee Mileage Lewis Bros. Battery, Batteries R. W. McClellan & Sons, Paving Materials John McCullough, Employee Mileage Larry McLemore, Employee Mileage Marine Biological Consultants, Inc., Marine Ecology Study Marshall Industries, Instruments · Metermaster, Inc., Metering Supplies Morrison Company, Valves Nakase Brothers, Gardening Supplies National Chemsearch, Solvents & Cleaners National Lumber & Supply Co., Building Materials Nelson-Dunn Inc., Pump Parts City of Newport Beach, Water · Newport Financial Corp., Hardware C. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel Retainer Noland Paper Company, Reproduction Paper Oakite Products, Inc., Cleaner The Ohmart Corp., Electrical Supplies Orange Coast Hardwe>od & Lumber, Hardware Orange County Chemical Co., Chemicals Orange County Radiotelephone, Page Unit Rental Orange County Stamp Co., Office Supplies & Rubber Stamp Oreo Electronics, Electronic Supplies Pacific Telephone · Ron Parker, Employee Mileage Norman I. Parsons, Employee Mileage M. C. Patten Co., Pipe Supplies Pictorial Sciences, Inc., Aerial Photos W. A. Plummer Mfg. Co., Operating Supplies Porter Boiler Service, Inc., Boiler Parts Postmaster, Postage Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage The Pryor Giggey-Co., Freight · Pyramid Fence Company, Fencing Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal The Register, Employment Ad Richey Electronics) Inc~, Telemetering Supplies Robbins & Myers, Freight Robertshaw Controls Company, Controls & Freight Jack H. Ross, Employee Mileage San Bar, Ecological Research Supplies Santa Ana Blueprint Co., Printing Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motors & Motor Parts Santa Ana Electronics Company, Telemetering Supplie1 Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Lab Supplies Scientific Products, Lab Supplies s. F. Serrantino, Employee Mileage . The Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Supplies A. H. Shipkey, Inc., Truck Tires Singer Business Machines, Postage Meter Rental Smith Optical Service, Safety 3lasses Snyder Manufacturing Co., Maintenanca Supplies So. Cal Forming, Inc., Pump Repair I-2 AMOUNT 583 .85 1,532.67 47.70 179.44 115.60 4.' . 1, 230 -~ 914.21 1, 7:)9 .68~ 22. 64. 200. 70, 26. 34~ 129 .11 153.70 78.96 67.50 2,391.9:) 21.20 36.54 10.34 55.81 473.29 86.49 313.41 366.15 7.95 800.:)0 905.31 107.27 116.26 72.5:) 23.32 24.77 17.72 20.:)8 462.67 8.25 4.95 128.09 95.40 13.27 11.97 50:).00 54.18 29.2:) 767.63 40.0J 22.34~ 85 .65 8.18, 595 .63 113.52 57.22 30.11 258.16 24.c::c:: 156.'~ 58.82 33.3:) 405. L~2 39. 29 6J. '~2 61~. 89 37.33 3'7 .10 WARRANT NO. 21165 21166 21167 21168 1 .169 ~170 21171 ~ 21172 , 21173 . 21174 ~ 21175 21176 21177 . 21178 .211,79 21180 21181 21182 21183 21184 21185 21i86 21187 21188 21189 2119:> 21191 21192 21193 21194 21195 21196 21197 21198 21199 2120() 21201 21202 :212:>3 2120Jf ,21205 21206 21207 212:>8 212:>9 IN FAVOR OF South Orange Supply, Piping Supplies $ Southern Calif. Coastal Water Research Project Authority, 73·74 Deposit per agreement Southern Calif. Edison Southern Calif. Gas Co. Southern Calif. Water Co. Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., ~ottled Water Speed-E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Stanco Mfg.· Company, Equipment Parts Standard Oil Company, Gasoline & Diesel F~el Stang Hydronics, Inc., Pump Parts Sully Miller Contracting Company, Paving Materials T & H Equipment.Company, Inc., Equipment Parts Bruce .Taylor, Employee Mileage Tell Steel, Inc., Steel Tool & Hoist Division, Engine Parts Triangle Steel & Supply, Steel J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Blower Harry L. Twining, Employee Mileage _ Twining Laboratories, Concrete Test Supplies Union Oil Co., Gasoline United Auto Parts, Truck Parts Utilities Supply Co., Tools Van Waters & Rogers, Flocculation Stuoy Supp. (M06-14-72) John Waples R.S., Odor Consultant Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts Western Fastener Company, Hardware & Pump Parts World Travel Bureau, Inc., Various Mtg. Travel Expenses Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage Xerox Corp., Reproduction Service George Yardley Assoc., Electric Supplies Zodiac Paper Co., Reproduction Supplies AMOUNT 188.72 73,350.:>o 28,723.:)8 1,301.31 3.2:) 100.JS 382.04 37.31 481.56 707.23 308.50 53.89 37.62 832.8:) 488.J.3 17.94 254.40 4.:>5 6:).0:) 1,128.46 685.65 136 .9·:> 2,073.28 264.a:> . 4:>9. J5 628.12 324.54 57.18 963.26 58.82 6:). QL~ TOTAL JOINT OPERATING $ 162,258.87 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF John Carollo Engineers, Engineering-Plant Constr. Daily Pilot, Bid Notices E~o69 & PW-031 E.T.I & Kordick, Contractor I-8-3 Engine & Compressor Supply Co., Test Equipment Ficker Architects, Architect J-13 Mel Gorham Electric Co., Contractor P2-2:> Hemisphere Constructors, Contractor P2-21 James E. Hoagland Co. & Hoagland Engr. Co., Contr. Pl-9-1 Franklin Miller, ~nc., Pipeline Delumper 68,705.77 22.56 25J 800. ·JJ 328.02 2,929.50 7,123.23 107,173.24 61,332.:>a 5,966.22 38,231.61 1,683.10 239.60 572.93 24,440.0:> J. Ray Construction Co., Contractor J-13 Rutan & Tucker, J-lQ Trial Counsel Twining Laboratories, Testing J-13, I-8-3 & P2-21 Wilmington Instrument Co., Instruments F. T. Ziebarth & Ziebarth & Alper, Contractor J-4-1 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF I-3 $ 3L~4, 54 7 . 88 $ 506,806.75 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 21210 21211 21212 21213 21214 21215 2r216 21217 21218 21219 21220 21221 21222 21223 21224 21225 21226 21227 Chino Basin MWD, Construction Grant Transfer County of Orange, Compaction Test 2-14-1 Lowry and Associates, Engineering Service 2-15, 2-17, 2-18 & Construction Survey 2-14-1 Sully Miller Contracting Co., Contractor 2-14-1 Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Testing 2~14-1 DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF The Register, Legal Notice Ordinance 304 ·2-16 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY'FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering Service 3-19, 3-20 & Construction Survey 3-17, 3-17-1, 3-18 County of Orange, Compaction Test 3-17-1 McGuire Construction, Contractor 3-17-1 . Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Testing ·3-18 Twining Laboratories, Concrete Testing 3~17-1 DISTRICTS NO. 3 & 11 SUSPENSE FUND· WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Construction Survey 3-17 County of Orange, Compaction Test 3-17 Osborne Laboratories, Pipe Testing 3-17 J. F. Shea Co~, Inc., Contractor 3-17 Testing Engineers, Inc., Pipe Testing 3~17 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF City of Newport Beach, Connection Fee Collection FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS The Irvine Company, Bayside Drive R/A II-1 ' $ $ AMOUNT 455,700.00 187.~8 21,875.78 838,798.~ 3,152.0 1,319,713.71~ 25.06 . 5,.993.50 17.01 24,509.95 988.00 90.00 31,598.46 ., $ 31,623.52 $ $ 216.00 128.61 450.00 314,856.00. 1,404.00· 317 ,054.61. '-" 297.50 165, 4.So. 39 165 '77'7. 89 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. . IN FAVOR OF 21228 A. G. Tutor Co., Inc & N. M. Saliba Co., Contr 5-19 +r-2 $ AMOUNT 56,574.oo WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 21229 21230 21231 2J232. 21233 21234 21235 21236 21237 21238 Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services Ervin Engineering, Refund Plan Check Fee Balance Vista Park Homes #4 et.al., Refund Plan Check Fee Balance ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Bo-Mar Construction, Contractor 7-5-lR Boyle Engineering, Engineering Service.7-5-lR and Construction Survey 7-2D-7 · · County of Orange, Compaction Test 7-5-lR Thomas A. O'Sullivan and Ellis W. Stanley, Reinbursement Agreement Twining Laboratories, Compaction Test 7-5-lR Westclock Development, Refund Permit Fees DISTRICTS NOS. 1 & 7 . . SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Amack Dep~sition Service, Legal Services 7-6-1 Suit . -III- AMOUNT $ 25.50 19.02 85. r ..._ .........,. $ 129.52. • 3,585.60 3,610.50 361.91 543.56 60.00 800.00 $ 8,961.57 $ 9,091.09 29.56 SEPTEMB ER 12 , 1973 JOINT MEE TING (#4) Election of District 7 Chai rman -Finne l l r ead .le t ter from Clifton Miller re resignation . Then Don Smith and Do nald Saltare l li were nominated for Chairman . The Dir~ctors voted and Do n Smi~~ was e l ected. (#6) Reoort of Joj _nt Cha5rma n F i nne ll called a meet i ng of t h e Executive Commi t tee for Sept. 25 and i nvited Directors Blackman an d Kowal s ki to atte n d . He then stated the Board needed to select an Alternate Commissione r t o SCCWRP to replace Cl ifton Miller . A question was asked regarding t hei r meetings and was answered they were h eld in Los Angeles dur i n g the daytime . Jesse Davis was nomi n ated b u t d ecline d t he nomination b e cause of hi s busy schedule. It was the n move d t h at Henry Duke be n o minated and the motion was seconded .. Hy de then stated that he thought it was t i me the Board re t urned to p r oper protocol and that the d elegate to SCC WRP als o be nomi n a t ed f r om this body . The question was called for and t he motion carried . Hyde r epeated was he just sai d about a dele gate to SCC WRP and t h en moved that the de l e gat e 's position be de c l a red vac ant . No s ec o nd to the motion -motion died. Finnell reiterat e d f or the new Directors that Li n d sley Pars ons has b e en the dele g ate since the i nce ption of SCCWR P . Wh en h e did not run for re -e l ection on Newport Beach Cit y Co u n cil, he lo st h i s Di rectorship on the Board but it wa s t h e op i nion of the Dis t ric t s that h e shoul d remain on as our repre sentati ve to S CCWRP . Finne l l then reported on meeting i n Wa s h ingt on ,D .C ., Oc tober 1st with EPA As sistant Administra t o r Joh n Qu arle s a n d De p u t y Ass i s tant Admini strator Robert Sansome r e best p r a c t icab l e waste t reat ment t e chno l ogy and seco ndary treat me n t r e qui reme n ts for ocean dis - charge rs . This i s a follow-u p mee ting to the one he l d in San Francisco in July . Representative s f rom Hawa ii, Alaska , Wa s h ingt on & Califo rnia will attend . Said t h a t th e staff h ere h a s b e en conducting some v e r y d e t a i_ed tests and the r es u l t s have bee n g ive n to Harvey Hunt t o come u p wi th a de finiti on of be s t prac tic ab l e wast e treat ment tech n o lo g y . Anythin g th at i sn 't s tarted by July 1 s t _1 974 , rather th a n co ming under s e c ondary tre a t me nt , wi ll come in under "best pra cticab l e treatme nt ". I t i s the con sens us o f op ini o n o f ocean disc har g ers o n P ac i fi c Coast that i t p e rh a ps might be t he way to come in mos t e c o n omica lly . I t i s h ope d that we -c an meet wi t h Stit e Board once we ge t s u g gestions from JC E to review them . We may not me et the Califo rni a s t acdar ds so we wi ll h a ve t6 meet t h e Ca l i f. ocean requirem ents a nd o u r P lan h as already b een a pp r o ved by t h e St a t e a s me et ing them . Ho p e to e n c ourage the p art i cipat i o n o f th e SWRCB s o th a t we c o uld h ave a rep r es e n t a tive from th e State o f Ca l if . Whil e attemp ting to c h a n ge the d e fini ti o n , we are go i n g o n with proje c t a t Pla n t 1 . Are pro b a bly the onl y Dist r i ct in Califo r n i a who h a v e a d e fini t e pla n and wh o h a v e r e c e i ved a l l th e necess a ry ap pro v al s that can b e r e c e ived at this part ic u l ar time , a n d at t he same t ime we are atte mptin g to ge t the de finiti on p u t i n a ma nne r th a t wi ll achieve t h e _obj e ct i v es of a ll o f us in a more e conom i cal wa y. (#7) Re port of Ge n e r a l Mana ge r Mr . Harp e r r e port e d fur t h e r on wh at F i nn e ll was j ust dis cuss ing . Sai d co n cerning work t h a t has b ee n conduct e d h e r e on phy s i cal -ch e mi cal tre atme n t , f o u nd t hat i t i n crease d c o st s of our c h emi c a l s of mayb e $1 2 mi l l i on to a pproach sta n dards that h a v e b e en es t a b lis hed by SWRCB . It do es n ot t a k e c a re of BOD r e moval . Thi s i s th e area that we wi ll try t o do somet h i n g a bou t . (#7) Reported on the Alternate Fuel Source Committee. Board authorized th e staff to wo r k with County Roa d Department and sanitary land fill disposal people to try to develop the recycling or reuse of the solid wastes as a fuel source .. Commi'ttee has been war.King tor months and next Friday will be fina l izing request for proposals form that will be submitted this month or early next month to the County Supervisors . Prop osal request ? will be for a feasibility s tudy of this area . Quite a few agencies throughout the U.S. have a means for disposing of or discarding wastes and as an ene rgy source . Also reported that some time ago after Water Quality Bill was passed, he had reported that our agency was in line for several million dollars where we did not receive any federal grants. After that, attorneys for EPA defined those eligible were those that were in states that had s ome kind of participating program, and Ca lifornia did not have participating program unt il last two or three years . Have · been working with Congressman Hinshaw along with State Board and they are attempting to get a change in that Bi ll so we may get some $1. 9 billion. Right now New York, Pennsylvania, & Mich igan are going to get most of the money. Have to app ly to EPA by Oct. 1st if we want to get this. (#8) Report o f General Counsel Regarding Standard Agreements with cities in Districts 2 & 3 , Cities will be and are receiving a rush of building permit applications to meet the Oc tober 1st deadline. One of the questions th at is going t o come u p is if they have to apply before October 1st or if the permit has to be issued. It was then clarified that the date issued wi ll be date to go by , as it is stated in the ordinance . Also reported on problem l as t month with Bank o f America who buys our bonds in mo s t of the Districts, except 1 & 7, In June they star.ted communications with Treasurer indicating they wanted to increase their fees . Treasurer didn't feel they would be able to and contract was binding. Turned it over to Nisson and he did not agree to change in fees . Had a binding written contract that was entered into in 1 952 and was no pro visio n for escalation in their fees. Is a constitutional provision that would prevent Districts from doing it even if they wanted to. Said they indicated that they would let it .rest for the moment. Nisson stated he did a little work in District 7 ~~garding the suit of Sully-Mi ller. Al so advised that a new problem had surfaced r egarding conso lidation of Districts 3 and 4 because of Assembly Bi ll 2 008 involving the maximum tax rate that may be levied by the consolidated Di s trict. District 3's is 47.3¢ and District 4 's is 41¢. Have been trying to work this problem so that when a nd if the consolidation does take plac e , Distric t 4 will be paying the same tax rate which was the intent of th e a g reement and would have been done if this new l egislation had not been passed . Nevil then asked if it would be possible for the Boards of Districts 2 and 3 to take a ction to stipulate that any fil i n g for building p e rmit s pri o r to Octob e r 1 s t would c o n s titute t h e building no t subj ect t o t h e fee. Hate t o see the cities b e p ut in a pos i t ion of b a d publi c r e l at i on s jus t b e c a u se they d o n 't pro c ess t h e p e rmit fa s t e n ough . Th e n i t is city 's f a ul t th a t the s ubdivide r is out of a lot of mon e y . Smith ans we r e d th a t t h is wa s di s cuss ed quit e a bit a t Commi t t ee l e v e l a nd i t was f e l t t h a t the r e h as t o be a b r eaking p o int somewh e r e . Ne vil as k e d if th e Co mm i t tee 's discuss ion was f o r t h e i ss u a n ce or the f i ling date a nd Smi th said i t wa s the i ss u a n c e o f th e pe r mit . -2- (#8) Just commented that their Building Department was receiving applications from some without plans and specifications. Would be defeating the purpose if changed date and would deluge staff with ap~lications. Fox said they don't issue permits until these things are all approved. Said he went along with Nevil on his theory. Nisson stated that · the language of the ordinance reads "issued" Is hard to say that "applied for" means "issued". Smith also stated that that was why they set the date up so far so they would have time. Vanderwaal said that all fees are paid on issuance of building permit in his city. Winn wanted to make a motion to find out about changing this date but Finnell said that the wording was definite in ordinance and procedure re issuing the permits was definitely set. EXECUTIVE SESSION 8:04 -8:24 (#16) Report of EDP Committee Stevens thanked committee .and JWS & FAH for all their work. Said we had the best people in Orange County •.. (I agree) Read report. It was the Committee's recommendation that the firm of Peat, Marwick & Mitchell be engag~d by the Joint Boards of _Directors to conduct study and make recommendation on feasiblity of electronic data processing for the Districts. $10,300. maximum and 43 man days. Batt.in asked whether the Committee could consider the possibility of going in with the County and Stevens answered that it will one of the considerations of this organization. Ralph Clark stated that we could save $10,000 if we forget the study and use the County's study, and use private enterprise to handle this rather than governmental department. There are other governmental entites that are going to plug into this and think we are wasting money on this study. Stevens answered that one of the biggest mistakes ls not enough preparation before getting involved in the work. May save $10,000 now but ·until someone actually studies the needs for this particular . District, may cost you $150,000 later. San Diego was a good example of this. Hyde asked just what items would be considered. Stevens said it would be to study the needs of our accounting department--long range plans; whether or not we need to get involved in EL'P now or two years from now or when and what kind of service we should get involved with; whether we should do anything; would take input at this level and determine what should be done with it in order to operate at most efficient level in 5 or 10 years. It was then moved to approve the recommendations of the Committee. Motion was seconded . There was a little more discussion re going with the County and Root pointed out that it wa~ a little premature to decide that yet. Have to cross some of these bridges to even determine what the needs are here. Said he thought this · organization should take advantage of that information and that it may well be the implementation that is required. We aren't even sure that we should have EDP here and if we do, what we need. Think these considerations have to be answered someplace along the line by somebody. -3- (#16) Stevens commented further that this was brought up by Committee as a potential solution if we get down to whether we need a system. Tried to get someone who is totA.lly obj~ctive. (?) Said he would like to speak to the motion. Have been in computers for some time. Certain things you don't do any other way . Would be nice to! see one of the study groups come in and say you shouldn't do something but usually doesn't happen. Called for the question. Motion carried. Porter moved that the Committee be commended for their work .. Motion seconded. Applause. (#25c) Standard Agreements FAH reported that we have been very successful in getting agreements signed by various cities. Those not signed are Westminster, Garden Grove and Stanton. Have been advised by Westminster that City will approve agreement. City of Garden Grove would prefer that Garden Grove Sanitary District would collect the fees rather than the City. FAR recommended that the Board approve that. The City of Stanton would like the fees to be collected by the Stanton County Water District rather than the City and we would recommend that this be done . May be some areas not covered by Stanton County Water District and then we would have to collect ·those fees here. Feel that this would be the best way to handle it. It was then moved and seconded that Districts 2 & 3 be authorized to modify their agreements so that Garden Grove Sanitary District and Stanton County Water District may collect payment of fees . Motion carried . (#47) Agreement W/City of Fountain Valley re 2-14 -1 Nisson reported that it would cost an additional $25,000 ·in construction . Total amount of extra strength pipe we have to have is 261 feet and agreed that extra costs of this construction will be equal to 1/18 of the total cost which is the figure of $4 ,500. The costs may vary but the figure of 1/18 will be fixed . (#59) Report on scheduling of Master Plan facilities REL reported that staff was instructed to meet with consulting engi neers and bring up to date all Master Plan construction. Referred to map and pointed out various trunks that were overloaded or were to be changed . Said recently the Districts' staff has taken measurements of the sewer flows in the area and have found that we can better handle the flows by a few short connections or diversions . Will be able to eliminate one of the relief sewers in Master Plan report. Said we should proceed at this time in preliminary engineering for the trunk sewer and complete them perhaps 9 months ahead of schedule . It would be the staff's recommendation to proceed with preliminary engineering to establish the a l ignments and get the concurrence of the cities involved so we can proceed with the design of the sewers for the balance of the Master Plan facilities. (#60) REL reported further on sewer capacities and what could be done by di version facilities. Sql tarelli asked if we :. were buying enough time by putting in additional diversion facil!ties or would we buy more time by putting in paralleling. Ray answered that the only paralleling could be a small reach which he pointed out to the Directors that would be eliminated here. Didn't feel that Tustin 's relief would buy that much. -4- (#60) Ralph Clark asked if this plan was taking into consideration the critical areas primarily or overall. Ray answered that basically to be~in with plan to start the preliminary engineering to complete the Master Plan sewers as outlined in the ~eport . of 1969 . Have sufficient capacities up to Mitchel.,1. and Red Hill. This is to continue with that system up to the northerly part of District 7. Said they were recom- mending that we start preliminary engineering ahead of time schedule in Master Plan report because of the investigation that should be done by engineers. Saltarelli then asked if it wo~ld be necessary to put more capacity on Red Hill north of Mitchel l and REL answered yes , a l l the way up . -5-