The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1973-02-14COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. a. sax 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) February 9, 1973 TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411. TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUN'J:Y SANITATION ___ D.ISTRICTS NOS. 1 ~_?-'--_3, 5, 6~:.....,r:--A_l_,JD_l_l _________ _ Gentlemen: The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanj_tatii::1n Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,, 5, 6, 7,, and 11, of Orange County, Ca.liforniaj \'Jill be be ld: WEDNESDAY EVENINGJ FEBRUARY 14, AT i':30 P,M, 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 1f\77 .l.;J/ :J Tentative adjournments prior to next regular meeting: Executive Committee-· 5:30 p.m., February 27 District No. 3 7:30 p.m., March 7 ME ET I ~.rG DA l E Fe b. 1 4 , 19 7 3 TI ME 7 :30 o .m. DiSTRICTS 1,2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ,7 & 11 DISTRICT 1 (HERRIN)····· (CASPERS) •••• (WELSH) .••.•• ACTIVE DIRECTORS GR ISET· • • • • ~ ___ _ BATTIN •.••• _ ~ ___ _ MILLER..... ~ --__ PORTER. • • • . __Q::_ ___ _ DISTRICT 2 (PEREZ). ······SMITH ······ (~~DAA )· ······CASTRO ····· CUL VER· • • • • !LAN GER) •• •• ··FINNELL···· KOWALSKI). ···FOX········ GR ISET)· ·····HERRIN ····· (HOLLIND ~N )· ··JU ST······· (ROB ERTS)····· NEVIL······ (CASPERS)····· CL.A.RK · • • • • • ~RE I NHA~DT) • • ·ROOT· • • • • • • DU TTO N) ••• • ··S TEPHENSON· DUN NE )······ ·WINN······· DISTRICT 3 ~---- _.i.:::::::::. ----~ ---- v------ _i.e::::::::::. ---- ~ ---- ~--- ~---- ~---- _JL __ -- ~---- ~---- CULVER ••••• ---1.L:-___ _ (CASPERS) •••• !HINES) ...... KOr~Al-S KI) .•• COEN) •••.••• (GR I S ET)····· (FRANKIE'(/ I CH). (NUIJEN S ) • • • • (MILLER) •• • • • (REINHARDT) •• (BLACK MAN ) ..•• r LL'"~E "" ' J. '" 11 / ••• (bOTTON .••••• (ROBERTS) ••••• (BYRNE) ••••.•• DISTR ICT 5 BATTIN ••••• ~ ___ _ DAVIS...... ~ ___ _ F 0 X • • • • • • • • ..,.----__ __ GREEN • • • • • • ~ ___ _ HERRIN ·····. V------- LA CAY 0 · · . · · ....£1::::_ --__ LEYHS · • •• • · ~ ___ _ LO NG .•• • • • • -LL-___ _ MC ~mIN NEY • _u:::::.. --__ ROOT .••.••• ~ --__ SA LES •••••• __w::::_ ___ _ 3 CC7T . . • . . . ~ ___ _ STEPHENSON . ~ ___ _ STEVENS .••• ~ ___ _ VANDERWAAL • .---___ _ (CRO UL) •••••.• MC INNIS ••• ~ ---- (BAKER) ••••••• GASPER'S • • • • ~ ---- KYMLA •••••• ~---- DISTRICT 6. ,,1,1..~~~ ,, (r<-L PORTER • • • • • (BA TT IN) • · • • • CP<SPE~S • • • • (M C IN NIS).·· STORE······ DISTRICT 7 C\·IE LSH) •••••• MILLER •.••. (CASPER S ) · · • • CLARK ······ (H ERRIN)····· GR I SET ····· PORTER ••... !FISCH BACl:J) ••• QUIGLEY •••• MC INNIS) ..•• ~S ••••• PEREZ) •••.•• SM I TH •••••• r, ... .XR ICT 11 1coEN) ....... GI BBS ~~ ... (CASPf:RS ) .• • • BAKER ~· • • • • (COEN) •.• • · • • DUKE • • • • • • · DIS TRICT 8 (JOHNSQN ). • • • • BOYD • • • • • • (CLARK) •.••••• CASPERS • • • • MI TC HELL • • • 12/1/72 ~--- ~ ------~ ------ v ___ _ ./ ----v ___ _ _Q:_ __ -- (l.----- 1/ <V"==== v----- JO I NT BO~. RDS ACTIVE DIRECTORS iLANGER) •• ····FINNELL·····~ -- CASPERS)···· ·BAKER······· \_-/ -- CASPERS) •••• ·BATTIN······~ -- ,..--CASPERS · · · · :-'L ~ -- ( WEDAA) • • • · • • ·CASTRO· · • • • • ~ -- (CASPERS) •• · ··CLARK·······~ -- CULVER ······ ~ -- (HINES)·· • • · · ·D AV IS·· • • • • • ---1.L -- (COEN) ••• ·•· ··DU K E········~ --KOWA ~SKI) ····FOX········· ~ -- COEN ········GIBBS·······~~- COEN ········GREEN······· ~ -- HERR IN)····· ·GRISET· · • • • · ~ -- GR ISET) •••••. HERRIN ······ -1L -- HOLLINDEN) ···JUS T ········ ~ -- MC INNIS)···· KYM LA· • • • • • • ~ __ FRANKIE't/ICH) ·LACAYO······ ~ __ NU I JE NS) • • • • ·LE W IS· • • • • • • -1:::::::... __ MILLER) •••• · ·LONG········ ~ __ CROUL) • • • • • • ·MC IN NIS ·· · • ----1...L" __ · MC WHI NNEY · • ~-~WE LSH) •••••. ·MI LLE R······ ~ __ ROBER TS)····· NE VIL······· ~ __ PO RTE R· • • • • • (FISHBACH)· ···QUIGLEY····· (Me-I-NN-IS-)-o-.-· ROGE~-S--· • • • • • REINHARD T)·· ·ROO T········ BLACKMAN) ••. ·SALES ······· PER EZ ·······SM ITH······· DUTTON) ..• ·· ·STEPH ENSON ·· ROB ERTS).··· ·STEVENS ····· .... ,... T t.IJl lTI"\\ ,.. ___ _ ~111.. !11\'!0/' '• 'v lV l\C' • • • • • • BYRNE )······ ·VA ND ER WAA L·· DUNNE )······· WINN········ * * * * * ~- ~-- __b:::::_ -- --1:::::::::.. -- ~ -- ~--1..----- ~ -- ~- ~-- (JOH NSO N) BOYD········ ---- OTHER S MITCH ELL ···· ---- HARPER SYLVESTE R LEWIS DUNN CLAR KE SIGLER NISSON TAYLO R BR OW N BOETTNER CARLSON FINSTE R GA LL OWAY HOH EN ER HOW ARD HUNT KE I TH LYNCH MADDO X MARTINSON MU RONEY PIER SA LL STEV ENS KEtJNEY ftcETII1G DATE Feb. 1#, 1973 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 DISTRICT 1 ACTIVE DIRECTORS (HERRIN)····· GRISET· • • • • ./ (CASPERS) •••• BATTIN..... -.,;----- (WELSH) •••••• MILLER..... ~ === == PORTER • • • • • ~ ___ _ DISTRICT 2 (PEREZ)·······SMITH······ (w~DAA)·······CASTRO····· · CULVER····· LANGER)······FINNELL···· KOWALS l< I) • • • ·FOX· • • • • • • • GRISET)······HERRIN····· HOLLIND~N)···JUST······· ROBERTS) • • • • ·NEV I·L • • • • • • CASPERS)· • • • ·CLARK· • • • • • lREINHARDT)···ROOT······· DUTTON)······STEPHENSON· DUNNE)·······WINN······· DISTRICT 3 )wh ,/ ---r-----------+---./_ -----,-----------_../ ____ _ ..; _./ ____ _ -./----- ~-----r-- CULVER. • • • • -+ ___ _ (CASPERS) •••• BATTIN ••••• _____ _ ~HINES) •• ) •••• DAVIS •••••• -~-___ _ KOWAL-SKI ••• FOX •••••••• _.; ____ _ COEN) ••••••• GREEN • • • • • • + ___ _ (GR I SET)·.··· HERRIN····._ .. __ ---- (FRANKIE't/ICH). LACAYO····· ~ ---- (NUIJENS) •• •• LEWIS······ (MILLER) ••• •• LONG······· ~ == == ~ ) MCWHINNEY. ~ ---- REINHARDT) •• ROOT ••••••• -T ___ _ (BLACKMAN •••• SALES •••••• -----r-___ _ .... I I"'t>EN) ~,.."....... " ~L..L.. 1~1 • • • u'"'V1 I•••••• --r----- ~ TTON .). • • • • STEPHENSON • --r-___ _ (ROBERTS • • • • • STEVENS ••••. ---7--___ _ BYRNE) ••••••• VANDERWAAL • _____ _ DISTRICT 5 CROUL) ••••••• MC INNIS • • • _!____ ---- BAKER) ••••••• ~ •••• + ---- KYMLA • • • • • • ----- DISTRICT 6 PORTER • • • • • V- (BATTIN) • • • • • .C1%8 FIRS-: • • • ---:T ---- (MC INNIS) • •• STORE······ ./ == == DISTRICT 7 WELSH • • • • • • MILLER • • • • • CASPERS) • • • • CLARK • • • • • • HERRIN) • • • • • GRISET • • • • • . PORTER ••••• ~FI SCHBACt1) ••• QUIGLEY •••• MC INNIS) •••• ROGERS-••••• _PEREZ) •••••• SM I TH •••••• / -r------r----- ~----y..,, -;r;--7-- ~TRICT 11 (coEN) ....... GIBBS ...... L --__ (CASP~RS) • • • • BAKER • • • • • • __:!__ ---- (COEN) • • •• • • • DUKE • • • • • • • __L_ --_..__ DISTRICT 8 (JOHNSQN ) ••• • • BOYD •• • • ~ . • (CLARK) ••••••• CASPERS • • • • MITCHELL • • • 12/1/72 JOINT BOARDS ACTIVE DIRECTORS ~LANGER) •••••• FJNNELL····· -4--- CASPERS)····· BAKER······· --;;--- CASPERS) • • • • ·BATTIN· • • • • • ----~ --. . CASPERS· • • • • (WEDAA) ·······CASTRO······ ~ -- (CASPERS)····· CLARK······· _L -- CULVER· • • • • • t/ ( ) -t/--- HINES ·······DAVIS······· ---- COEN) ••• ·····DUKE········ _./_ --KOWA~SKI) ····FOX········· _L -- COEN ········GIBBS······· / -./---- COEN ········GREEN······· HERRIN)····· ·GR I SET······ -./--- GR I SET)· • • • ··HERRIN···· • • ==..;= === HOLLI NDEN) ···JUST········ _./_ -- MC INN I SJ • • • • KYMLA • • • • • • • _.;_ -- FRANKI EW I CH) ·LACAYO······ ~ __ NUIJENS) •····LEWIS······· _./_. __ MILLER)···· ··LONG····· • • • -~-__ CROUL) • • • • • • ·MC INNIS· • • • -"-__ MCWHINNEY·· .! (WELSH)······ ·MILLER······ -./--- (ROBERTS)····· NEVIL··.···· • --; --:--. . . . . . ... PORTER· • • • • • FISHBACH)····QUIGLEY····· MC INNIS)····ROGERS······ RE 1 NHARDT) • • ·ROOT· • • • • • • • BLACKMAN)····SALES······· . HOLLINDEN)···SCOTT······· PEREZ)·······SMITH······· DUTTON)······STEPHENSON·· ROBERTS)·····STEVENS····· ~~·~C I NtH S) • • • ·STORE· • • • • • • BYRNEJ·······VANDERWAAL·· DUNNE)·······WINN········ * * * * * 0..,... --r-------w c, == ~- ~---r-- ---:7 ---v __ _ ~== (J_OHNSON) BOYD········-· --- OTHERS .. \ye.,, ~~~f (~\e'1 tJe:~ MITCHELL···· ---- HARPER .. SYLVESTER LEWIS . DUNN CLARKE SIGLER NISSON TAYLOR . BROWN BOETTNER CARLSON FINSTER GALLOWAY HOH EN ER HOWARD HUNT . KEITH LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON MU RONEY PIERSALL STEVENS KENNEY lv,(l)A-1 I II BOAnc s OF DI~ECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange Cou nty, California JOINT BOARDS P. 0 . Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain \/alley, Calif., 92708 Pre liminary AGENDA 2/9/73 Febr u ary 14, 1973 -7:30 p.m. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation ( 2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern , if necessary (4) EACH DI STRICT (5) (6) (7) (8) Consideration cf motions approvin g minutes of the following meetings, as mailed : District 1 January 10 , 1 973 regular Distric t 2 January 10 , 1973 regular and January 17, 1973 adjourned District 3 J anua:ry ] 0 ~ 197 3 rR3:ular District 5 January 10, 197 3 regular Di stri ct 6 Janu ary 10, 197 3 r egular District 7 January 10, 197 3 regular Di strict 11 January 10, 1 973 regu lar ALL'DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Gene r al Counsel ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Building Committee and consideration of motion to receiv e and file the Committee 's written report (9) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Building Committee: (a) Consideration of motion accepting Committee's recommendation that the matter regarding the new carpeting for the Administration-Engineering Building Additions, Job No. J-7-2, be resolved as follows: (b) (c) That the architect, the general contractor and/or the carpet supplier provide protective rloor pads, rubber caster replacements for the desk chairs, and a rotary-brush type conunercial vacuum cleaner to the Districts, at no cost Consideration of motion accepting proposal of Grillias, Alves, Pirc & Rosier, dated January 24, 1973, for consulting architectural services in connection with design of treatment facilitie~ in accordance with State and Federal regulations for construction grant eligibility, .on a per diem fee basis in an amount not to exceed $15,000 for the 1973 calendar year. See page "D" Consideration of motion commending the Districts' groundskeeping crew for their diligent efforts to improve and make pleasing, the aesthetic appearance of the treatment plant sites (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to convene in exP.cutive se~~1oP to consider personnel matters (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to reconvene in regular session (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of actions on items considered in executive session (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to ratify action of Executive Committee, engaging the law firm of Rutan & Tucker, Attorneys at Law, with Garvin F. Shallenberger to serve as Special Trial Counsel in connection with litigation regarding the construction of Ocean Outfall No. 2, Marine Section, Job No. J-10. See page "E" (14) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file report and recommendation of Joint Staff Management/Employee Committee on alternate group ~ealth insurance program, and authorizing the General Manager to execute a contract with Family Health Program, Inc. to provide an alternate group health plan for Districts' employees, at no additional cost to the Districts. See page "F" (15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file written report of Special Committee to Interview Engineering Firms for Design of Project No. 2 -2- (16) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive. and file staff progress report on Treatment Plant Construction Projects. See page "G" (17) ALL DISTRICTS Verbal status report by Commissioner Lindsley Parsons re Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) three-year final report (18) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion approving and authorizing issuance of a temporary discharge permit by District No. 2 to the Metropolitan Water District, to accept dewatering discharge in connection with the Water District's construction of the Tonner Tunnel, for a fee of $350.00 per million gallons~ See page "H" (19) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file financial report of Director of Finance for six-month period ending December 31, 1972 (20) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing two staff members to attend concurrent meetings of the Water Pollution Control Federation--Legislative Seminar, and the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies in Washington, D.C. on April 3rd and 4th, and authorizing reimbursement for travel, lodging, meals and incidental expenses incurred (21) ALL DISTRICTS Conside~ation of motion tn ~eceive and file letter from Citv of Huntington Beach, dated February 8, 1973, regarding ~ acquisition of property immediately adjacent to Plant No. 2, and refer to Executive Committee for study. See page "I" (22) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file certification ·or the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment (23) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving warrant books for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and author~zing payment of claims listed on page "A" ' (24) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications, if any (25) DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim, dated January 29, 1973, in the amount of $25,573.41, submitted by Sully-Miller· Contracting Company in connection with construction of the Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 1, Contract No. 7-6-1, as recommended by the General Counse:i. See page "J" (26) DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants, if any. See page "C" -3- (27) DISTRICT l Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "B" (28) DISTRICT l Other business and communications, if any (29) DISTRICT l Consideration of motion to adjourn (30) DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants, if any. See page "B" (31) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "C" (32) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications, if any (33) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (34) DISTRICT 11 {35) (36) Consideration of motion approving enlargement of the scope of Keith and Associates' proposal for design of Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension, Contract No. 11-12, authorized July 12, 1972, to include preparation of plans and specifications for Slater Avenue Pump Station Improvements; and authorizing the General Manager to direct Keith and Associates to proceed with said work in accordance with the terms of their proposal tlated February 2, 1973, on a per diem fee oasis tor an additional amount not to exceed $3,000. See page "K" DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Consideration of motion approving. suspense fund warrants, if any. See page "B II DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page tf c fl (37) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications, if any (38) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (39) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of 'motion to receive and file letters from A. J. Tutor Company, Inc. & N. M. Saliba Company, dated February 8, 197 3, and Louie Hall Boring Company,· Inc. , dated December 28, 1972, and approving contractor's request for substitution of boring subcontractor in connection with construction of Sewer Trunk "B" -Unit 8 -Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Coptract No. 5-19. See pages "L" and "M" (40) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2, to the plans and specifications for Sewer Trunk "B" -Unit 8 - Pacific Coast Highway Force Main Contract No. 5-19, · authorizing an addition of $8,49~.55 to the contract with A. J. Tutor Company, Inc. & N. M. 3aliba Company. See page "H 11 -4- (41) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress report on construction of' Sewer Trunk "B" -Unit 8 -Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-19. See page "O" {42) DISTRICT 5 Discussion re restoration of traffic control on Pacific Coast Highway in connection with construction of Sewer Trunk "B" - Unit 8 -Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-19 See page "P" (43) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "B" {44) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications, if any (45) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (46) DISTRICT 7 (47) (48) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Irvine Industrial Complex, dated January 12, 1973, in connection with construction of Master Planned Jamboree Road Subtrunk No. 2 (from Barranca Road approximately 1400 feet southerly) and consideration of the following actions: See page "Q" (a) Consideration of motion approving request of Irvine Industrial Complex to construct Jamboree Road Subtrunk No. 2, Reach 54, Contract No. 7-2D-7, and declaring intent to enter into standard Master Plant Reimbursement Agreement upon completion of s~id facility (b) Consideration of motion accepting proposar of Boyle Engineering, dated February 7, 1973, for engineering services in connection with preparation of plans and specifications for Jamboree Road Subtrunk No. 2, Reach 54, Contract No. 7-2D-7, for a lump sum fee of $2,200. See page "R" DISTRICT 7 C.onsideration of Resolution No. 73-13-7, approving and authorizing execution of a Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement with Irvine Industrial Complex providing for reimbursement by the District for Main Street Subtrunk East, ReaGhes 41 and 42, Contract No. 7-2C-l; Jam~oree Subtrunk No •. 1, Reach 47, Contract No. 7-2C-2; Von Karman Avenue Subtrunk, Contract No. 7-2C-3; McGaw Avenue Subtrunk, P6rtion of Reach 49, Contract No. 7-2D-4; Jamboree Road Subtrunk No. 2, Reach 52, Contract No. 7-2D-5; and Jamboree Road Subtrunk No. 2, Reach 53, Contract No. 7-2D-6, in the total amount of $329,708.80. See page "S" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Rutan & Tucker, Attorneys at Law, dated February 6, 1973, requesting quitclaim of a portion of sewer easement to Sterling Graydon, Jr.,and consideration of Resolution No. 73-14-7, authorizing execution of a Quitclaim Deed to Sterling Graydon, Jr. for portion of existing District easement relative to an offsite sewer in Assessment District No. SA. See pages "T" and "U" -5- (49) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress report on construction of West Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-5-lR. See page "V" (50) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "C" (51) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications, if any (52) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (53) DISTRICT 2 Further consideration of Ordinance No. 203. See page "W1' (54) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3, to the plans and specifications for the Santa Ana River Interceptor, From Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, · authorizing an addition of $3,118.50 to the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting Company. See page "X" (55) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to issue a change order to the plans and specifications for the Santa Ana River Interceptor, From Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, for the placement of riprap :ballast to protect the 24-inch Olive Subtrunk crossing of the Santa Ana River, in an amount not to exceed $11,000. See page _,__:y_.: __ (56) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress report on construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, From Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1. See page "Z" (57) DISTRICT 2 Engineer's verbal progress report in connection with design of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, From Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue (58) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "B" (59) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications, if any (60) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (61) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny the following claims submitted by General Telephone"Company in connection with construction of the Knott Interceptor, Contract No. 3-17, as recommended by the General Counsel: Date December 29, 1972 January 29, 1973 Jan11ary 29, 1973 Febru.ary 2, 1973 February 2, 1973 February 2, 1972 -6- Amount $ 421.02 900.00 (Estimated) 200.36 ~26.59 847.'"(4 1,850.67 (62) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1, to the plans and specifications for the Knott Interceptor, Contract No. 3-17, authorizing an addition of $3,168.00 to the contract with J. F. Shea Company, Inc. See page "AA" (63) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress report on construction of the Knott Interceptor, Contract No. 3-17. See page "BB" (64) DISTRICT 3 Further consideration of routing of Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18, through the City of Westminster, deferred from regular meeting of January 10, 1973. See page "CC" (65) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion deferring March 7th hearing re Ordinance No. 303 to 7:30 p.m., March 15th (66) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "B" (67) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications, if any (68) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn -7- BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. 0 •. Box 8127 10844 l:llis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 of Orange County, California II (1) (2) (3) ~Y ( 3a) ""flL~ i~ ............ . . LffiER ···-·-·-N\ \ ~ A/C ••.• TKLR - ·--··-······-......._ .... --.................. FILE---·-- 1.ElT~ ----- (4) f\t\ \S,, A/C -.TKlR. -·@ ---------· --.J@ FILE··-·-· ~~;~-=@ (8) M\~ JOINT BQA~Ros Final A G E N D A 2/14/73 ADJOURNMENrs POSTED..= COMP & MILEAGE ••• ~- FILES SET UP ................... .. RESOLUTIONS CERTIFIED ••• LffiERS WRITIEN~ ............. . MINUTES WRITTEN ........... - 'Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation MINUTES HLED ........... -- Roll Call Q<o-~ Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary~. . _ .. ALL DISTRICTS . t · Consideration of motion to receive and file minut·e excerpt from the Board of Supervisors showing. appointment of Director and alternatesto serve on the Districts' Boards as follows: Director District Supv. Ronald W. Caspers 1 EACH DISTRICT 2 3 5 6 7 8 11 Alternate Supv. Robert W. Battin Supv .. Ralph B. Clark Supv. Robert W. Battin Supv. David L. Baker , Supv. Robert W. Battin .Supv. Ralph B. Clark Supv. Ralph B. Clark Supv. David L. Baker Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 January District 2 J~nuary January District 3 January District 5 January District 6 January District 7 January o k-~~tria-t_11· ~ Jan'tta.ry ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman ALL DISTRICTS 10, 1973 regular 10, 1973 regular and 17, 1973 adjourned 10, 1973 regular 10, 1973 regular 10, 1973 regular 10, 1973 regular ~973~ul·~ Report of the General Manager ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Counsel ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Building Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report -(9) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Building Committee: (a) N\ \s FILE ··-----· LE11'ER --- }.le_ •• -TKLR - ........................... .~ (b) Consideration of motion accepting Committee's recommendation that the matter regarding the new carpeting for the Administration-Engineering Building Additions, Job No. J-7-2, be resolved as follows: That the architect, the general contractor and/or the carpet supplier provide protective floor pads, rubber caster replacements for the desk chairs, and a rotary-brush type commercial vacuum cleaner to the Districts, at no cost FllE ----/ ~~v Consideration of motion accepting proposal of Grillias, Alves, Pirc & Rosier, dated January 24, 1973, for consulting architectural services in connection with design of treatment facilities A/C -~~~~\5> '~ ..... Piii "'"" , LETTER Et?li::L. in accordance with State and Federal regulati.ons for construction grant eligibility, on a pftr diem fee basis in an amount not to exceed $15,000 for the 1973 calendar year. See page "D" A/C _.TKLR .... <. ( C ) - -~\s Consideration of motion conunending the Districts' groundskeeping crew for their diligent efforts to improve and make pleasing;the aesthetic appearance of the treatment plant sites I __.......... ........... . (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to convene in executive-session to consider personnel matters ~-.,~ (11) ALL DISTRICTS FILE . / Consideration of motion to reconvene in regular session '1" 30 lETTER-\'1~§ A/C --~TKLR !. 12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of actions on items considered in executive ~.:.~~,~,.~~ ... session -~. 73-15 (13) ALL DISTRICTS ~~ ,~ Consideration of motion to ratify action of Executive ~-~ Cammi ttee, engaging the law firm of Rutap & Tucker, Attorneys E~' ---~pr\ t, at Law, with Garvin F. Shallenberger to serve as ·special Mc ---1KLR-U~~~ Trial Counsel in connection with litigation regard.ing the ---,-·~fl{ tf~r construction of Ocean Outfall No. 2, Marine Section, J'ob ----·;$.!; No. J-10. See page "E" (15) ALL DISTRr'CTS Consideration of motion to receive and file report and .rec0mmendation of Joint Staff Management/Employee Committee 'on alternate group health insurance program) and authorizing the General Manager to execute a contract with Family Health Program, Inc. to provide an alternate group health plan for Districts' employees, at no additional cost to the Districts. See page "F" ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file written report of Special Committee to Interview Engineering Firms for Design of Project No. 2 -2- (1 6 ) ~\S ~~=:@ A ' .. TKLR .•• M \ C:::, -(18) 'F~j~ LffiER ···---s A/C ..•. TK LRM.. ~ (1 9 ) M \S ~ ALL DISTRICTS Co n siderat io n o f mot i on to r eceive and f ile sta ff progres s r qport on Tr eatmen t Pl ant Co n str uction Pr ojects . See p age "G" ALL DISTRICTS Ve r bal status r epor t b y Commiss i oner Lind s l ey Par s ons re Sout hern Ca l i f o r nia Coas t a l Water Research Pr o ject (S CCWRP) three-year fi n al r eport ALL DISTRICTS Co n s i d eration of motio n approv i ng and auth orizin g i ssuan c e of a temporary di s charge permit by District No . 2 to t he Metropolitan Water District , to accept dewatering discharge in connect i on with the Water Distr ict 's construction of t h e Tonne r Tunnel, for a fee of $350 .00 per million ga llons. See p age "H" ALL DISTRICTS Considerat io n of mot i o n to receive and file finan c i al r epor t of Director of Finance for six-month period ending De c emb e r 31 , 19 72 ( f ?n) J ALL DISTRICTS . · ·· ~ Cons i deration of motion authorizing two s t af f membe r s to {+\'""·~~ .. ~~:~::_) Fil£ ---attend concurrent meetings of the Wate r Pollution Contro l < ...... LETTER ·······-Wt\ '7:> Fede ration--Legislati ve Seminar , 2.nd the Association of AIC .... TK LR ·-· Metropolitan Sewerage Ag en ci es in Washington , D. C. on Apri l 3rd --·-~ 4th~a nd authorizing reimbursement for travel , l odging , meals ad incidental expenses ·i ncurred . ..,,,. t)N. JI ~-fl. ( l'll!~~2 1 ) AL L DISTRICTS -·. Consideration of motion to receive and file l e tte r f rom City of Huntington 5eQch , dated February 8 , 1973 , r egard i ng a c q u isit ion of prope r ty i mme diately ad jace nt to Plant No . 2, and refe r to Executive Committee for study . See page "I 11 (22 ) (2 3 ) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file cert ification of the General Manager that he has che cked all bill s appearing o n the agenda , found them to be in orde r, and that he r ecommends authorization for payment ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion app r oving J o i n t ROLL CALL vorE Op erating and Cap ital Out l ay Revolving warrant bo·oks fo r ..... ~-signatur e of the Chairman of District No . 1 , and authorizing p ayment of claims listed on page "A" · ,'(24))' ALL DISTRICTS ~ Other business and communicat i ons , if a n y DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Consid e r atio n of motion to receive , file and deny claim , dated January 29 , 1973 , in the amount of $25 ,573 .41, submitted by Sully-Mi ller Contracting Company in connection wi th construction of the Sunflower Interceptor , Reach 1 , Contract No. 7-6-1, as recomJDended by the General Counsel . See page "J " DI£TRIGTS 1 & 7 Gonaidcration of motion approving suspense fund wa ·rrant s , ifany . Seepage nc 11 -3- ·(27) (28) {2~) M.\.~ (30) N\\S (31) BIS'±'IHGT 1 ConsidePation of motien a:~pre,.:iHg wa:n·afi'6s, if e:ny. ~ee page "E" D~RICT l~ other business and comm~ications, if any DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn q~4".!5 DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants, if any. See page "B" DISr:PRIG'3? e <Goasideration of motion approving warrants, if aRy. Bee f}age "C" (32) . BL?TRICT 6 ~ ~ Ot~ busines6'-and communltra-t-ions, if any (33) DISTRICT 6 q:e;(> MlS Consideration of motion to adjourn (34) r.,- (35) .M\S (36) (37) (38) /Y\ /s (39) FILE -~\S (40) FILE_ ..... LETrER-\ A/C .... TKLR HOO ('{'\ s _........,._ ........ 1,. .. 1 ........ ... DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion approving enlargement of the scope of Keith and Associates' proposal for design of Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension, Contract No. 11-12, authorized July 12, 1972, to include preparation of plans and specifications for Slater Avenue Pump Station Improvements; and authorizing the General Manager to direct Keith and Associates to proceed with said work in accordance with the terms of ~heir proposal ua~~u ~eo~ua~y 2, 1973, on a per diem fee basis for an additional ~ount not to exceed $3,000. See page "K" DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants, if any. ~ee page "B" DIS'±'RIO'l? 11 Consideration of motion appPoving warFanta, if any. Sec page "C" DI~RICT 11 °"' . pth~ busine~ and comm~ication~f any DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn 9 '. ~p·· DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to receive and file letters from Afr.~ Tutor Company, Inc. & N. M. Saliba Company, dated ·February 8, 1973, and Louie Hall Boring Company, Inc., dated December 28, 1972, and approving contractor's request for substitution of boring subcontractor in connection with construction of Sewer Trunk "B" -Unit 8 -Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-19. See pages "L" and "M" DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No.· 2, to the plans and specifications for Sewer Trunk "B" -Unit 8 Pacific Coast Highway Force Main Contract No. 5-19, authorizing an addition of $8,49~.55 to the contract with A.G."Ht. Tut~r Company, Inc. & N. M. Saliba Company. Sec page -4- '• "(41) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress '\ \_s r·eport on construction of Sewer Trunk "B" -Unit 8 -Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-19. See page "O" ~) DISTRICT 5 ~"-~ Discussion re restoration of traffic control on Pacific Coast iER -·-rvrl $ H:Lghway in connection with construction of Sewer Trunk "B" -Ye __ 1Kui·~--Unit 8 -Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-19 ------· See page "P" I_.. ·(ij3) DIS~RIO~ 5 (44) (45) (46) A/C --'l'KLl .-. ' ~3 .•• ___........-...) Je.,. ' ,. - Coasi~eration of motion appFoving lTaFFants 3 if any. ~ee page "B" DIS.TRICT 5 ~ °"" Otft'et business a-n-0 commurti-Oations, if anY. DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn 9 ~.:s-i.i DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Irvine Industrial Complex, dated January 12, 1973, in connection with construction of Master Planned Jamboree Road Subtrunk No. 2 (from Barranca Road approximately 1400 feet southerly) and consideration of the following actions: See page 11 Q11 Consideration of motion approving request of Irvine Industrial Complex to construct Jamboree Road Subtrunk No. 2, Reach 54, Contract No. 7-2D-7, ?.!ld d~'=! l::i.ring intent 'tc enter into stands.r·d Maste~ Plant Reimbursement Agreement upon completion of said facility (b) Consideration of motion accepting proposal of ~-~Boyle Engineering, dated February 7, 1973, for ~~~engineering services in connectio~ with preparation AJc_na.1 _ of plans and specifications for Jamboree Road Subtrunk No. 2, Reach 54, Contract No. 7-2D-7, for (47) (48) ~y~~ (~I A-~~8 J.ETI'ER- A/C _.TKLR 1!9-/,S _.J (\ ~fa_ v, - a lump sum fee of $2,200. See page "R" WWWMU DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 73-13-7,·approving and authorizing execution of a Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement with Irvine Industrial Complex providing for reimbursement by the District for Main Street Subtrunk East, Reaches 41 and 42, Contract No. 7-2C-l; Ja~boree Suotrunk No~ 1, Reach 47, Contract No. 7-2C-2; Von Karman Avenue Subtrunk, Contract No. 7-2C-3; McGaw Avenue Subtrunk, Portion of Reach 49, Contract No. 7-2D-4; Jamboree Road Subtrunk ,·No.' 2, Reach 52, Contract No. 7-2D-5; and Jamboree Road Subtrunk No. 2, Reach 53, Contract No. 7-2D-6, in the total amount of $329,708.80. See page "S" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Rutan & Tucker, Attorneys at Law, dated February 6, 1973, requesting quitclaim of a portion of sewer easement to Sterling Graydon, Jr.,and consideration of Resolution No. 73-14-7, authorizing execution of a Quitclaim Deed to Sterling Graydon, Jr. for portion of existing District easement relative to an offsite sewer in Assessment District No. SA. See pages "T" and "U" -5- (49) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress N\\S report on construction of West Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract (50) J\J\ \ s (51) No. 7-5-lR. See page "V" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "C" PILE -----f52) DISTRICT 7 LETTER~ Consideration of motion to adjourn q:.s-~ AJc_na.a~ D~STRICT 2 Further consideration of Ordinance No. 203. See page "W" If~ 0DISTRICT 2 Ag~ Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3, to LmER _\ the plans and specifications for the Santa Ana River InterceptOr, A/C-TKtRl\l ~ From Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, . '.~\ · authorizing an addition of $3,118. 50 to the contract with , Sully-Miller Contracting Company. See page "X" (55) File -- I.ETTER -- A/C --TICl.R -\(_ . f'J\ ~ DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to issue a change order to the plans and specifications for the Santa Ana River Interceptor, From Plant No. 1 to·Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, for the placement of riprap ballast to protect the 24-inch Olive Subtrunk crossing of the Santa Ana River, in an amount not to exceed $11,000. See page "Y" (56) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress hA\::::> report on construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, :v\ From Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1. See page "Z" :;----~ DISTRICT 2 . . . AJc_tnR~ Engineer's verbal progress report in connection with design ---·-N \ c'? of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, From Katella Avenue to ~\\ La Palma Avenue (58) M\5 (59) -(60) PILE ~ ~~61) A/C -TICl.R - \,,,,!----\ s N\ - DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "B" DIST CT 2 ~ . Othe business and~mmunicat~tf any DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn \~·.a lo DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny the following claims submitted by General Telephone Company in connection with construction of the Knott Interceptor, Contract No. 3-17, as recommended by the General Counsel: Date December 29, 1972 January 29, 1973 January 29, 1973 February 2, 1973 February 2, 1973 February 2, 1972 -6- Amount $ 421.02 900.00 (Estimated) 200.36 426.59 847.74 1,850.67 (62) DISTRICT 3 ~u Consideration of motion approving Change Order No~ 1, to LETTER -the plans and specifications for the Knott Interceptor, we _ .. TKLN\\ s Contract No. 3-17, authorizing an addition of $3, 16 8. 00 -·-····-~-····· to the contract with J. F. Shea Company, Inc. See page "AA 11 DISTRICT 3 (63) {'\\ \ s Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress report on construction of the Knott Interceptor, Contract No. 3-17. See page ·"BB" PILB~. LEnER~ DISTRICT 3 we _tKLR .... Further consideration of routing of Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18, through the City of Westminster, deferred from regular meeting of January 10, 1973. See '... ·-·.. page 11 CC" FILE ---~~,/(_h5) DISTRICT 3 ~~\\S Consideration of motion deferring March 7th hearing re Ordinance No. 303 to 7:30 p.m., ~arch 15th (56) DISTRICT 3 \$ Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. (\\ See page "B" (67) DI~RICT 3 ~ Oth&r busines~nd co~catio~f any (68) DISTRICT 3 ['!\. \ S Consideration of motion to adjourn 10··' 2:. -7- MANAGER'S AGENDA REPOR T County Sa nitation Dis tricts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange Coun t y, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Cclif., 92708 Telephones: JO INT BOARDS Feb ruary 9 , 1973 REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, Feb ruary 1 4 , 1973 7 :30 p.m . Th e followi ng is a brief explanation of the more important non -r outine items which appear o n the enclosed agenda and VThich are not other111ise self -expl anatory . Warrant lists are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immedi ately preceding the meeting but wi ll appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting . Joint Boards Ar ea Code 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 t\los . o ana '-) -.K.t;?uttT 01' .bUlLOlM.r Guivi.IVI.l TTEE AND Ac;TIONS UN COMMITTEE 1 S RECO:tviMENDATIONS ·-The Committee met on January 30th . A written r eport of this meeting, together wi th the r e commend ations to the J oint Boards is enc l osed for the Directors on ly. No . 10 -EXECUTIVE SESSION -The Boards will convene in Executive Sess ion to consider personnel matters including the vacant pos i tion of Assistant General Manager and Ch i ef Engineer, and r ecommendations of the Special Committee on Compensation of Department Heads . No . 13 -EMPLOYMEN'I OF SPECIAL TRIAL CO H.'~SEL .:.. The motion appea"ring on the agenda ratifies the ac ~:..0n of the Executive Comm i ttee in ap pointing special t r ial counsel in connect i on with the Ocean Outfall No . 2 litigation . Three firms r ecom - mended by Mr . Ni ssan, the Districts ' General Counsel , were intervie1:red by Joint Chairman Finnell and_, on his recommenda- tion, the Comm ittee selected the firm of Rutan and Tucker , Santa An~, with the spec ifi c unde r standing that Nr . Ga rvin Shallenberger will be the special tri al counsel . No . 14 -CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATE HEALTH PROGRAM -Under the provisions of the Memorandum of Agreement with the Orange County Employees Association, approved by the Boards in January, it is stipulated that the Districts shall make available to the emp loyees, a prepaid health care medical plan (HMO) as an alternative choice to the existing group health insurance plan . The staff has prepared a separate report on this matter and it is included with the agenda material. No . 15 -REPORT OF SPECIAL COMMITI'EE TO INTERVIEW ENGINEERING FIRMS FOR DESIGN OF PROJECT NO . 2 . Due to the lack of State and Federal funding, this project will have to be postponed. A separate report on the special committee 's activities to date is enclosed . No . 1 6 -VERBAL S'l1ATUS REPORT RE : SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJ ECT (SCCWRP) -Lindsley Parsons, the Districts ' Commissioner on SCCWRP, will discuss the status of the study's three -year fina l report . No . 18 -AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF A TEM PORARY DISCHARGE PERMIT BY DISTRICT NO . 2 TO THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT (MWD).- '11he recommended motion appearing on the agenda would permit Di strict No . 2 to issue a temporary discharge permit to MWD to accept dewatering discharge from outside th e Districts in c0i1n.scti0n -with the MWD ' s construct:i.on of tJ.-n:: To:LJ.ner '.I'w1i1el . In accordance with the terms of the Joint Ownership, Op eration and Constructi on Agreement , this must be approved by all District s . No . 20 -AUTHORIZING ATTENDANCE AT MEET I NGS , APRIL 3 AND 4 I have tentative ly accepted an invitati on to partic i pate as a panel member in the Wate r Pollution Control Federation's Government Affairs Seminar to be held in Washington , D.C., on April 3rd . Concurrent ly, the Associa,tion of Me tropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) will conduct mee tings to determine their course of activities for this current year at the WPCF Seminar site . It is requested t hat the General Manager and one other staff member be authorized to attend the WPCF 's Government Affairs Seminar a nd the concurrent meeting of AMSA . Since our Districts are active in both organizations and these con - ferences have proved ·to be extremely valuabl e, the Boards may wish to.authoriz e the Joint Chairman or an alternate · to attend t hese meeting~ Districts 1 and 7 No . 25 -CLl\IM OF SULLY -MILLER CONTRACTING COMPAl'TY RE: SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR SEWER , CONTR~CT NO . 7 -6 -1 -We recei ved a $25 ,573 .41 claim from the contractor for Reach 1 of the Sunflowe r Int e rceptor, for additional work . This job was accepted as complete by the Board . on Ma y 10, 1972. The General Counse l recommends that the claim be denied. -2 - District No. 11 No . 34 -EXPANDING SCOPE OF ENGINEERING SERVICES, CONTRACT NO . 11-12 -On July 12, 1972, the Board accepted a proposal and employed the engineering firm of Keith and Assoc iates for engineering services in connec tion with the design of the Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Exten sion, Contract No . 11-12. The District 's connecting Slater Avenue Pump Station is badly in need of repair and mo d ification~ and we believe that a savings could be effected if the required recon - struction design is done at this time by the engineer . Therefore, it is recommended that the proposal from Keith and Associates (included i n the agenda material) be accepted, and that the firm be emp loyed to prepare a report and plans and specifications on the recomm ended method of r epairs', for a total fee not to exc eed $3000 , based upon the hourly r ates set forth in the p r oposal . District No. 5 No . 3~ -REQUEST FOR SUBSTITUTION OF SU BCONTRACTOR , CONTRACT NO . 5 -19 (SEWER TRUNK "B " -UNIT 8.-PACI FIC COAST HI GHWAY FORCE MAIN) -A. J . Tuto r Company, Inc ., and N. M. Saliba Company , Cont r actors fo r t he Pacific Coast Highway Force Main construct i on, have r equested the substitution of the boring suocontrac-cor . 'l'ne formal. request and attachments a r e included in the agenda material . It is the staff 's rec om - mendation that the requested substitution be approved . No . }-J.O -CHANGE ORD ER NO . 2 TO THE COAS'r HIGHWAY FO,R CE Mf\.IN ' CONTRACT NO . 5 -19 -The mo t ion appearing on the agenda appr oves additi onal costs to the project totaling $8 ,494 .55 . The Change Order (included with the agenda material), details seven specific additional i tems requirin g the extra work and c osts thereof . The staff recommends approval . No . 42 -RESTORATION OF ON -STR EET PARKING ALONG COAST HIGH\·7AY - Conceµtrated efforts are being made by the staff to e~pedite t he construction along the Coast Highway to minimize the in - convenience to the public and businesses. The Contractor has given full cooperation and his progress has exceeded all expectations . On -street parking has been restored on t he North side of the Highway and we are now ho l ding discussions with the State Di vision of Highways and the City of Newport Beach in, an effo r t to restore on-street parking on the Bay s i de· of the Highway (see enc l osed letter). The staff would l ike specific di r ection f r om the Board re ga rding possibl e traffic lane re -striping i n the completed construction area i f arrangements can be made with the State Division of Highways . -3- District No . 7 No. 4 6 -MASTER PLANNED JAMBOREE ROAD SUBTRUNK NO . 2 - The actions appearing on the agenda dec l are the intent of t he Dis trict to enter in t o a standard Master Pl an Reimbursement Agreement for t he construction of a segment of t he Distr ict's trunk sewe r Master Pl an. In addition , it accepts the proposal of Boyle Engineering to prepare the p l ans and specifications for the project . The project will be financed by the Irvine Industrial Complex which will then be reimburs ed from sewer connection receipts over a three -or -mo r e -year period for the constructi on costs invol ved . No . 47 -IV.IASTER PLAN REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WI TH IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX -Resoluti on No . 73 -13 -7 approves and authori zes the execut i on of a Reimbursement Agreement fo r the constructi on of several segments of the Distri ct 's trunk sewe r Master Pl an in the southeasterly port ion of the District knovm as the Irvine Industrial Complex area . The fina l costs have been reviewed by the Di strict's engineers and it i s recommended t hat the agreement be approved in a total amount of $329 ,708 .80 . No. 48 -QUIT CIAIM ING A PORTION OF DISTRI CT 'S EXISTING EA~~MENT -We have a r eques t on behalf of Mr . Sterling Graydon , Jr ., of 2081 Woodb ine Drive, Santa An a , that the Distri ct quit c l aim to him a portion of the sewe r easement on his property . Recent l y Mr. Graydon became a wa r e that a portion of his house and pati o encroac hed on the Di strict 's easement, t he r eby clouding t he title t o his property . The District 's staff has investigated the matter a n d r ecommen d s that that portion of the easemen t involving t he property own e r's impr ovements be quitc l aimed . The staff is con- tinuing to investigat e whether o r not the easement shou l d be quitclaimed gratuitou s l y . A r ecommendation concerning thi s will be ma d e at Wednesday 's meeting . District No . 2 No. 54 -CHANGE ORDER NO . 3 TO CONTRACT NO . 2 -14 -1 , SANTA ANA RIVE R INTERCEPTOR FROM PLANT NO . 1 TO KATELLA AVENUE -The cont ractor f o r this project , Sully-Mi ller Contracting Compa ny, Inc., encounte r ed inadequate sub -grade and was r equired t9 install addi t i onal rock bedding . The motion appearing on the agenda appr oves payment fo r the addit i ona l bedding in the amoun t of $3,ll8 .5o ·in accordance with the bid item appearin g in the contract. -4- District No. 3 No . 61 -CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES -CONTRACT NO . 3-17 -Gene r a l Telephone Company has filed a total of six c laims against t he District in connection with damage to the company 's facilities allegedly caused by the Contractor for the Knott Avenue Interceptor , Contract No . 3 -17 (J . F . Shea Company). Copies of these claims have been sent to the Contractor as it is his responsibility to resolve this type of damage claim. It is recomme nd ed that these claims be r ece ived, filed, and deni ed . No. 62 -CHANGE ORDER NO . 1 TO CONTRACT NO . 3-17 -The · Contractor, J. F . Shea Company , encountered inadequate sub - grad e (peat) on this project a n d was required to install additional rock bedding. The recommend ed motion appea ring on the agenda approves payment for the additional bedding in the amount of $3,168 .oo , in accordance with the specifi - castions and contract . No. 64 -FURTHER CONSID ERA TION OF ROUTING OF THE KNOTT AVENUE INTERCEPI'OR ( CONTRACT NO . 3-18) THROUGH THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER.- As of this date, the staff and District engineer have been unable to obtain an af f irmative committme nt from the Edis on Company obtaining an easement along their property_; therefore , the staff reque sts direc tion from the Boa rd with the possi - bility of further consi dering pre viously p roposed alt ernat e routes in an effort to expedite this proj e ct . These facilities are urgently ne e ded and if the matt e r of the routin g is not resolved soon, we will miss a very favo r able construction bidding period. No. 65 -DEFERMENT OF HEARING ON PROPOSED CONNECTION CHARGE ORDINANCE -It is t he staff 's recommendation that the scheduled hearing on the Dist rict's p r oposed connection charge ordinance be deferred f r om Ma r ch 7 to March 1 5 . This delay will give the District 's Municipal F inancing Consultant additional time to d eve lop r ecommendations to the Board concerning short-t e rm and long -term financial needs of the Dis trict . Fred A. Harper General Manager February 14, 1973 Report of the Joint ·chairman (A) Ca ll on Don Smith to report on his attendance at the Ca lifornia Association of Sanitation Agencies meeting in San Diego February 2nd and 3rd (B) Call on Jesse Davis to report on his attendance at an informal meeting of Federal and State officials at the International Hote l in Los Angeles on February 7th Call meeting of the Exe cutive Comm ittee for 5:30 p.m., Tuesday, February 27th. Invite Directors ~W~iEnn~~an~d:_5~~~~, or Directors ~and Nevi l. (D) How many Directors are going to participate in the League of Cities Le gislative se~ inar in Washington during the first week in March . The Districts will prepare a brief on activities concerning t h e EPA definition of secondary treatment for ocean dischar ge rs. .. ----. ------ Agenda Uem ··No:· 6 ~on .. ,.,.,. ~.,~ ... ~ ~ UNITED STATES ENVIRO~MENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ~1."'°'"~~V WASHINGTON. O.C .. 20460 DEC 2 71972 ·. ~· OFFICE OF' ENFORCEMENT AHO GENERAL courl5£L . . MEMORANDUM ·. """'". . .. ... . .. . : · ... : · .. · . . : TO· FROM : Assistant Administrator for Air and Water Programs : Assistant Administrator for Enforcement and General · ... Counsel · . . ·.. ..·: . ,. ·.SUBJECT : . Definition of "Secondary Treatment" --Ocean Outfalls ... . -- . . . . . . .. · . .· .. · .. ·: ~ .. . .. ·• . ... Question You have asked whether the definition of "secondary treatment" ·under section 304(d){1) may include primary treatment in the case. of o·cean outfalls, \·1here the municipality demonstrates that the (Jr·imar-y ti-€:u t.1at;;;t aff1 :.:::-:t d~~s r.~t h:r~ th~ e!'!'!i ronment. . • J : · · · · Answer 1•·' The term "secondary treatment" may not be defined under . §304{d){1) to include primary treatment for ocean outfalls --even where it is shown that a primary treated effluent will not harm the aquatic environment. / ~ . ·. Discussion Both the Act and its legislative history clearly show that the 1977 standardSof "best practicable" for industry and "secondary treatment" for municipalities were to be technology-based rather than based on water quality effects. Water quality comes into play . only through the provision that stricter standards than "best practicable11 or "secondary treatment" inay be imposed where necessary to meet water quality standards (§30l(b)(l)(C)). The Senate Report makes. this point clear: "The application of Phase l tectrnology to industrial point sources is based on the control ~i technologies for those sources and to publicly 1· owned sewage treatment works is based upon · ., (,.~·setondary· treatment. It is not based upon •. J ambient water quality considerations.11 c ~-' • ~" I • ~ ..... · .... • "' I '• .... ~ ,.. \ . . · .. : .. · .. · ··· ... . ·: . . . ·-.: ·: ·. ·~ .. · .... · .. : . ; •• 1..· ... ~ ..... . ·-: . . ~:. . · .. ·.'"' .. = .. : .. -~ .. .... ~: :. .. -· ·. ,·.,. ·~ ·..: " . ~ . Senate Report No. 92-414, 92nd Cong., 1st Sess. at p. 43. ',. · · In additi~n, §J04(d)(l) requires the Administrator to define "the degree of effluent reduction attainable through the applica- tion of secondary treatment." This language, like the language of §304(b)(l) (requiring the Administrator to dafine "the degree . of effluent reduction attainable through the application of the . best practicable control technology currently available"), is . basically tied to finding a level of technology rather than a level .of ambient harm. ._, . · John R. Quarles, J·r. Attachment · . . . , .. . · . . .. .. ·. ·. -· ; . . ..... . ... ;· . .. . .· . . . ... . .. • .. ;···· . ~ . .. . .. . ' ... "" ..... ·. ~. . ..... ·. ~rn;@~ll~~w . . FEB 081973. County Sanitation ·Distrk ~ of Orange County 4 • . ..... . . ··:~. -.•. , ; ...... .. :" ... .:~ . • .. ·: . ~-: - . ··•: ... ,, .. :.~~:~ -. --:· ··:· ·.-. ... COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COU NTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BO X 8 127. FOUNTAI N VAL L EY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUC L ID OF F-RAMP. S A N DIEGO FREEWAY) February 9 , 1 97 3 NOTIC E TO SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON DIRECT OR S ' FEES FOR CONCURRENT BOARD :MEETINGS Edward Just, Chairman Norman E . Cu lve r Clifton c. Mi ller TEL EPHONES : AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 I h ave been asked to advise you that there has been a c hange in meeting date from noon , Tuesday , February 13, to: Mor~day February 1 2 5 :00 p .m . in the Di s tricts ' office . I h a v e advised Mr . Nisson of the Committee 's January 25th discussions, and he will study the possibility of proposi~g permissive legislative action delegating Joint Administrat ive powe r s . FAH :j cc : Joint Chairman Finnell Co Art hur Ni sson ~~a21~ General Manager COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) February 9, 1973 Special Connnittee to Interview Engineering Firms for De.sign of. Project Report No. 2, Joint Works Improve-· ments for 1972-73 Fiscal Year Frank Sales Clifton Miller Henry Duke Robert Root Carl Kymla Gentlemen: I have submitted the enclosed memorandum to the Joint :Ooc.t.i.·ub et.::> a i·esult of the information received from the staff. In addition to the memorandum, I will submit to the Joint Boards' Executlve Committee a request fo:r clari- fication of the Special Committee's status. When our committee was appointed, its purpose was specifically to interview engineering firms for design of Project Nao 2. However, the Executive Committee and the Boards of Directors may intend to keep our committee intact for the purpose of considering and recommending engineering firms for a specific joint works project in the future. Enclosures cc: Joint Chairman Finnell Robert Nevil, Chairman Special Committee TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 i;g c;11la Item No. 15 .. February 9, 1973 MEMORANDUM TO: Joint Boards of Directors COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0 . BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 FROM: Robert Nevil, Chairman, Special Committee to Interview Engineering Firms for Design of Project No . 2 Our Committ ee has been informed, by the Districts' staff, that the Districts proposed Project No . 2 (Joint Works Improvements for 1972-73 fiscal year) will not receive State and Federal grant funds this year because of the low priority given this project by the State Water Resources Control Board . As Chairman of the Committee, I have instructed the staff to advise the twelve engineering firms who submitted proposals that the Districts will not proceed with Project No. 2 at this time. Enclosures Copy to: Frank Sales Clifton Miller Henry Duke Robert Root Carl Kymla Jan uary 1 7, 1973 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAI N VALLEY, CALIFORN I A 92708 (7 14) 540 -2910 (714) 962-24 1 I STAFF RE POR T TO SPEC I AL COMM ITTEE TO INTERVIEW ENGI NE ERING FI RMS FOR DESI GN OF PROJECT NO . 2 Robert Nevi l , Chairman Frank Sal e s Clifton Miller Henry Duke Robert Root Carl Kymla Special Comm ittee Chairman Nev il has asked that a status report be made to the Committee . Fo llow i ng the November 2 1st meeting of the Committee , t he Engineering Dep a rtment request e d proposa l s for engineering services from 13 consul ting firms . Twe l ve p r oposals have been r eceive d (see attached). At the time of the first meet ing of the Commi tt ee, it appeared that the selection of an en g ineering firm shoul d be a ccomplished within a 60 -9 0 d ay peri od; however , in the meantime the State Water Re s ources Contro l Boa rd has established rul es to s e t Gr a nt fund pri o riti e s and at the p r esent tirr.e it i s not known whethe r or not the Districts ' Pr oj e ct Report No . 2 will be appro ved for thi s fiscal year . It is our unders t and i ng that by February 1 st the Districts will know whethe r o r not this proj e c t will b e fund e d in 1 9 72 -73 . Once funding is ass ured, th e staff will proceed as di r ec t ed by the Committee and a Committee meeting date will be set by Chairman Ne vi l. FAH:j Enc l osures cc: J oint Chai rman Finnell Director J ohn Store ~a.~~ F r ed A. Harpe r q General Manager Engineering firms submitting proposals: VTN Consolidated, Inc. Kennedy Engineers, Inc. Engineering Science, Inc. Metcalf & Eddy Engineers, Inc. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 Lowry & Associates, Consulting Civil Engineers Boyle Engineering Brown & Caldwell, Consulting Engineers Koebig & Koebig, Inc. Pomeroy, Johnston & Bailey Toups Engineering, Inc. James M. ·Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. CDM, Inc., Environmental Engineers Gebb Engineering -Did not submit proposal Agenda !tern No. /9 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 812?, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92?08 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) TELEPHONES: AREA CODE ?14 540-2910 962-2411° February 2, 1973 Joint Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California Subject: Summary Financial Report for Six Months Ended December 31, 1972 Transmitted herewith, is the regular quarterly financial report for the six months ended December 31, 1972, prepared pursuant to the Boards' policy directive of June 14, 1972. · The statements summarize the fiscal activities of the joint cpcr~tic~s ~~d the individual Di8trictc for the first half 8f th8 1972-73 fiscal year, and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The most significant item of expenditure for the Districts is, of course, the outlay for capital facilities improvements and additions. Included in each District's statement is an itemization of their trunk sewer construction projects and respective share of the joint works expansion. Separate staff progress reports on the projects have been prepared and are included in the agenda material for the February 14th meeting. Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. If you have any questions concerning the material, I would be pleased to discuss them with you at your convenience. CASH AND INVESTMENTS Our continuing program of investing reserve funds (primarily capital funds ·accumulated for construction oT requifed sewerage facilities) has earned interest of $708;000 during the first six months of 1972-73. As of December 31., 1972, 96% of the Districts' cash funds were invested in short term government s~curities as shown below. The cash on hand includes $1.23 million returned from investments to provide funds for Districts 2, 3 and 11 1958 bond redemptions due Januar.y 1st. Cash on Hand Investments in Gov't Securitiei Total (All Districts) Amount $ 1,507,741 35,L156,294 $36,964,035 Percent 04% ~ 100% : ~OINT OPERATING FUND Insurance -Annual premium expense charged at time of payment. A budget transfer is not anticipated to be necessary. Chemical Coagulants -Sludge dewatering experimentation under way. Upon completion, materials purchased for operating dewatering facilities will be charged against this account. Research & Monitoring -Chemical precipitation experimentation at Clarifier "K" approved by Boards in October and is progressing satisfactorily. Expenditures for materials will be reflected in this account. Utilities -Power bill for sixth month ~stimated at $15,oorohas not been received and is not reflected in the statement. Break- downs in major mechanical equipment have increased the electrical power demand somewhat. As a result a budget transfer may be necessary later in the year. Prior Years Expense -This acdount represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account balance of a ~rior year. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND During the quarter $4.88 million was expended on joint works treatment and disposal facilities expansion, representing expenditures on fifteen major construction contracts and several minor projects. The share of the joint works expansion costs are reflected in the financial statements of the respective Districts. INDIVIDUAL !)!STRIC'!'S Taxes -47% of the 1972-73 tax levy has been apportioned as of December 31, 1972. Federal and State Grants -Su~narized below is the amount Federal and State construction grant funds received during the first six months. 1970-71 Joint Works Projects Other Joint Works Projects D~strict No. 3 Projects $4,505,300 representing 45% of grant 30,034 representing final payment 10,045 representing final payment O~her Revenue -Except as footnoted~ consists primarily of interest income and various fees. District Construction -Represents expendit~res on D~stricts master plan construction program of trunk sewers. Share ~f Joint Works Construction -Represents District's share of Joint treatment and disposal facilities expansiori. Bond Retirement & Interest Expense -Payment of principal and interest on outstanding general obligation bonds of respective Districts. -2- Share of Joint Operating -Represents Districts share of operating and maintaining jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities, and administrative activities, distributed based on gallonage flow. (See Joint Operating Fund Statement) District Operating and Other Expenses -Consists primarily of individual Districts general operating expenses and operation, maintenance and repalr of the respective District's collection system. JWS:ss Enclosures -3- 'i ACCOUNT TITLE ~·ector' s Fees, Memberships Gallonage Charge Line Mtce. & Repairs Station Mtce. & Repairs Manhole Repl. & Repair Connection Admin. Collect. Chg.-Conn. Fees Interdistrict.Sewer Use Bond & Coupon Collect. Tax Collection Share of JAO Expense Prof. Services-Legal Wof. Services-Engr. Printing -In House Printing Outside Printing & Notices Travel, Mtg. & Training Utilities Interest Expense Prior Years Expense TOTAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES Fiscal Year 72-73 as of 12-31-72 1972-73 LAST YEAR BUDGET TO DATE 5,400.00 1,100.00 250.00' 271,565.00 100,468.62 14,000.00 1,881.90 15,500.00 4,213.38 300.00 141. 02 600.00 7.26 1,000.00 50.00 250.00 100.00 . 11. 31 5 ,000. 00 . CURRENT YEAR TO DATE 1,400.00 119, 741.80 1,084.60 50.00 4,537.76 135.69 . 13.05 24.34 314,015.00 107,823.49 126,987.24 INCREASE (DECREASE) 300.00 19,273.18 (797. 30) 50~00 324.38 (5. 33) 5.79 13.03 lQ,:163. 75 • ~·.:4 UNEXPENDED BUDGET 4,000.00 250.00 151,823.20 12,915.40 (SO. 00) 10,962.24 164.31 SSG.95 .. · 1,000.00 50.00 250.00 75.66 5,000.00 187,027.76 'i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES Fiscal Year 72-73 as of 12-31-72 1972-73 LAST YEAR CURRENT INCREASE UNEXPENDED ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET TO DATE YEAR (DECREASE) BUDGET TO DATE r·-ector's Fees 12,600.00 4,150.00 4,750.00 600.00 7,850.00 ~ Memberships 900.00 900.00 Gallonage Charge 766,698.00 270,169.99 308,763.00 38,593.01 457,935.00 Line Mtce. & Repairs 40,000.00 18,843.46 17,714.22 (1,129.24) 22,28~.78 Station Mtce. & Repairs 8,500.00 2,521.83 3,600.17 1,078:34 4 .. g·99. 8.3 Manhole Repl. & Repair Connection Admin. 45,500.00 14' 151.12 13,689.15 ( 461. 97) 31,810.85 Collect. Chg.-Conn. Fees Interdistrict Sewer Use 2,000.00 2,000.00 Bond & Coupon Collect. I, 100. 00. 341. 39 253.86 (87. 53) 846.14 Tax Collection 1,600.00 29.27 57.98 28.71 1,542.02 .. .. Share of JAO Expense Prof. Services-Legal 2,500.00 2,500.00 ~of. Services-Engr. 7,500.00 3,639.32 500.00 (3,139.32) 7,000.00 Printing -In House Printing -Outside 150.00 45.65 (45.65) 150.00 Printing & Notices 350.00 350.00 Travel, Mtg. & Training 1,000.00 241.47 298.48 57.01 701.52 Utilities 3,000.00 1,297.80 1,360.62 62.82 1,639.38 Interest Expense Prior Years Expense 10,000.00 10,000.00 TOTAL 903,398.00 315, 431. 30 350,987.48 35;556.18 552,410.52 ACCOUNT TITLE Director's Fees ~ember ships ~ Gallonage Charge Line Mtce. & Repairs Station Mtce. & Repairs Manhole Repl. & Repair Connection Admin. Collect. Chg.-Conn. Fees Interdistrict Sewer Use Bond & Coupon Collect. Tax. Collection Share of JAO Expense Prof. Services-Legal Prof. Services-Engr. P1'f"nting -In House Printing -Outside Printing & Notices Travel, Mtg. & Training Utilities Interest Expense Prior Years Expense TOTAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES Fiscal Year 72-73 as of 12-31-72 1972-73 BUDGET 14,850.00 1,100.00 LAST YEAR TO DATE S,450.00 792,258.00 282,592.18 45,000.00 24,284.79 40,000.00 12,236.56 40,000.00 22,940.43 32,000.00 8,966.81 2,000.00 941.70 1,600.00 457.05 2,000.00 15.69 2,000.00 480.21 3,000.00 200.00 500.00 650.00. 218.38 25,000"00 8,581.32 .. 800.00 10' 000. 00 , 672.95 1,012,958.00 367,838.07 CURRENT YEAR TO DATE 4,500.00 326,059.70 10,357.44 10,646.83 11, 141.14 409.90 38.51 1,547.50 265.15 9,456.91 374,423.08 INCREASE (DECREASE) (950.00) 43,467.52 (13' 92·7. 35) (I,_ 589. 73) (22,940.43) 2,174.33 (941. 70) (47.lS) 22.82 (480.21) .· 1,547 .so . 46. 77 875.59 (672. 95) 6,585.01 UNEXPENDED BUDGET 10,350.00 1,100.00 466,198.30 34,642.56 29,353.17 40,000.00 20,858.86 2,000.00 1,190.10 1,961.49 2,000.00 1,452.50 200.00 500.00 .· 384.85 15,543.09 800.00 10,000.00 638,534.92 .. · ACCOUNT TITLE r·""ector's Fees \_,) Memberships Gallonage Charge Line Mtce. & Repairs Station Mtce. & Repairs Manhole Repl. & Repair Connection Admin. Collect. Chg.-Conn. Fees Interdistrict Sewer Use Bond & Coupon Collect. Tax Collection Share of JAO Expense Prof. Services-Legal ~f. Services-Engr. Printing -In House Printing -Outside Printing & Notices Travel, Mtg. & T1'aining Utilities Interest Expense Prior Years Expense TOTAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES Fiscal Year 72-73 as of 12-31-72 1972-73 BUDGET 3,300.00 250.00 120,089.00 20,000.00 66,000.00 19,000.00 6,500.00 9,500.00 100.00 700.00 2,500.00 250.00 250.00 200.00 26,000.00 2,400.00 2,500.00 279,539.00 LAST YEAR TO DATE 1, 100. 00 43,506.60 4,845.62 15,995.05 1,854.07 1,468.00 40.35 12.17 66.65 10,152.59 79' 041.10 CURRENT YEAR TO DATE 1,000.00 49,766.85 5,420.81 24,974.69 5,466.80 7,062.20 17.00 15.83 305.55 61.69 29.24 13, 101. 08 107' 221. 74 INCREASE (DECREASE) (100.00) 6,260.25 575.19 8,979.64 3,612.73 5,594.20 (23.35) 3.66 305.55 . 61. 69 I (37.41) 2,948.49 ?S::,180. 64 UNEXPENDED BUDGET 2,300.00 250.00 70,322.15 14,579·.19 411025.31 19,000.00 1,033.20 2,437.80 83.00 684 .1 i 2,194.45 250.00 188.31 170.76 12,898.92 2,400.00 2,500.00 172,317.26 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES Fiscal Year 72-73 as of 12-31-72 1972-73 LAST YEAR CURRENT INCREASE UNEXPENDED ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET TO DATE YEAR (DECREASE) BUDGET TO DATE r ·ector I s Fees \._) .·. 3,000.00 950.00 800.00 (150. 00) 2,200.00 Memberships 200.00 200.00 Gallonage Charge 145,327.00 51,199.57 55,086.38 3,886.81 90,240.62 Line Mtce. & Repairs 16,000.00 1,489.07 2,107.10 618.03 13,892 .. 90 Station Mtce. & Repairs 4,000.00 1,104.84 1,809.86 705.02 2,190.14 Manhole Repl. & Repair 7,000.00 7,000.06 Connection Admin. 6,000.00 1,559.68 2,280.29 720. 61 3,719.71 Collect. Chg.-Conn. Fees Interdistrict Sewer Use Bond & Coupon Collect. 100.00 46.85 44.75 (2 .10) 55.25 Tax Collection 450.00 3.30 5.85 2.55 444.15 .. ~ Share of JAO Expense Prof. Services-Legal ~f. Services-Engr. 1,000.00 1,000.00 Printing -In House 50.00 50.00 Printing -Outside Printing & Notices 150.00 150.00 Travel, Mtg. & Training 100.00 19.77 14. 72 . (5.05) 85.28 Utilities 2,500.00 838.38 1,144.55 306.17 1,355.45 Interest Expense Prior Years Expense 3,000.00 3,000.00 TOTAL 188,877.00 57,211.46 63,293.50 ·6,.082.04 125,583.50 ACCOUNT TITLE r. ·ector' s Fees \.,.I Memberships Gallonage Charge Line Mtce. & Repairs Station Mtce. & Repairs Manhole Repl. & Repair Connection Admin. Collect. Chg.-Conn. Fees Interdistrict Sewer Use Bond & Coupon Collect. Tax Collection Share of JAO Expense Prof. Services-Legal 1'PIS£. Services-Engr. Printing -In House Printing Outside Printing & Notices Travel, Mtg. & Training Utilities Interest Expense Prior Years Expense TOTAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES Fiscal Year 72-73 as of 12-31-72 1972-73 BUDGET 7,800.00 350.00 171, 667. 00 42,000.00 30,000.00 42,000.00 20,000.00 50.00 700.00 10,000.00 500.00 500.00 300.00 22,000.00 6,000.00 3,000. 00, LAST YEAR TO DATE 2,800.00 57,177.07 16,953.16 9,711.55 14,694.77 25.05 12.18 1,852.50 . 80. 29 7,081.64 CURRENT YEAR TO DATE 2,150.00 61,946.00 18,309.19 13,080.04 18,305.78 11.15 21.97 73.82 60.50 5,686.00 356,867.00 ll0,388.21 119,644.45 INCREASE (DECREASE) (650. 00) 4,768.93 1,356.03 3.,368 .49 3,611.01 (13. 90)' 9.79 (1,778.68) (19.79) (1,395.64) 9,256.24 UNEXPENDED BUDGET 5,650.00 350.00 109,721.00 23,690~81 16,919.96 23,694.22 20,000.00 38.85 678.03 9,926. ts 500.00 500.00 239.50 16,314.00 6,000.00 3,000.00 237.222.55 ' . '\, ACCOUNT TITLE Director's Fees 'WI Memberships Gallonage Charge Line Mtce. & Repairs Station Mtce. & Repairs Manhole Repl. & Repair Connection Admin. Collect. Chg.-Conn. Fees Interdistrict Sewer Use Bond·& Coupon Collect. Tax Collection Share of JAO Expense Prof. Services-Legal \.wbf. Service:.;-Engr. Printing -It~ House Printing Outside Printing & Notices Travel, Mtg. & Training Utilities Interest Expense Prior Years Expense TOTAL -.... COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES Fiscal Year 72-73 as of 12-31-72 1972-73 BUDGET 3,000.00 300.00 166,620.00 17,000.00 22,000.00 10,000.00 16,000.00 35,000.00 '/SU. 00 500.00 2,000.00 150.00 200.00 100.00 18,000.00 400.00 3,500.00 295,520.00 LAST YEAR TO DATE 1,000.00 57 ,077 .11 5,422.96 4,660.86 1,584.33 14,207.40 17.15 25.54 5,766.92· CURRENT YEAR TO DATE 1,000.00 68,633.12 .11,401.98 11,457.00 4,936.46 15, 372. 00· S9.66 26.78 ·6,672.53 76.50 4,981.00 89,838.7~ 124,540.53 INCREASE (DECREASE) 11,556.01 S,979.02 6,796.14 3,352.13. 1,164.60 42.51 1.24 905.61 4,904.50 34,701.76 UNEXPENDED BUDGET 2,000.00 300.00 97,986.88 S,S98.02 10,543.00 10,000.00 11,063.54 19,628.00 690.34 500.00 2,000.00 150.00 200.00 73.22 11,327.47 400.00 (1,481. 00) 170,979.47 ' -•. r l. Agenda item No /9 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TELEPHCN ES: AREA COOE 714 540-2910 962-2411 P. 0. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF·RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) February 2, 1973 Joint Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California Subject: Summary Financial Report for Six Months Ended December 31, 1972 Transmitted herewith, is the regular quarterly financial report for the six months ended December 31, 1972, prepared pursuant to the Boards' policy directive of June 14, 1972. · The statements summarize the fiscal activities of the joint 0peb:t.ti0ns afJ.d the individual Distrie;ts fo1: the fir>st hal.L of tiJ.t:~ 1972-73 fiscal year, and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The most significant item of expenditure for the Districts is, of course, the outlay for capital facilities improvements and additions. Included in each District's statement is an itemization of their trunk sewer construction projects and respective share of the joint works expansion. Separate staff progress reports on the projects have been prepared and are included in the agenda material for the February 14th meeting. Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. If you have any questions concerning the material, I would be pleased to discuss them with you at your convenience. CASH AND INVESTMENTS Our continuing program of investing reserve funds (primarily capital funds accumulated for construction of required sewerage facilities) has earned interest of $708,000 during the first six months of 1972-73. As of December 31,. 1972, 96% of the Districts' cash funds were invested in short term government securities as shown below. The cash on hand includes $1.23 million returned from investments to provide funds for Districts 2, 3 and 11 1958 bond redemptions due Januar~ 1st. Cash on Hand Investments in Gov't Securities Total (All Districts) Amount $ 1,507,741 35,456,294 $36,964,035 Percent 04% -2§_ ''JOINT OPERATING FUND Insurance -Annual premium expense charged at time of payment. A budget transfer is not anticipated to be necessary. Chemical Coagulants -Sludge dewatering experimentation under way. Upon completion, materials purchased for operating dewatering facilities will be charged against this account. Research & Monitoring -Chemical precipitation experimentation at Clarifier "K" approved by Boards in October and is progressing satisfactorily. Expenditures for materials will be reflected in t,his account. Utilities -Power bill for sixth month ~stimated at $15,00~has not been received and is not reflected in the statement. Break-- downs in major mechanical equipment have increased the electrical power demand somewhat. As a result a budget transfer may be necessary later in the year. Prior Years Expense -This account represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account balance of a.prior year. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND During the quarter $4.88 million was expended on joint works treatment and disposal facilities expansion, representing expenditures on fifteen major construction contracts and several minor projects. The share of the joint works expansion costs are reflected in the financial statements of the respective Districts. INDIVID'UAL DISTRICTS Taxes -47% of the 1972-73 tax levy has been apportioned as of December 31, 1972. Federal and State Grants -Summarized below is the amount Federal and State construction grant funds received during the first six months. 1970-71 Joint Works Projects Other Joint Works Projects District No. 3 Projects $4,505,300 representing 45% of grant 30,034 representing final payment 10,045 representing final payment Other Revenue -Except as footnoted, consists primarily of interest income and various fees. · District Construction -Represents expenditures on Districts master plan construction program of trunk sewers. Share of.Joint Works Construction -Represents District's share of Joint treatment and disposal facilities expansion. · Bond Retirement & Interest Expense -Payment of p·rincipal and interest on outstanding general obligation bonds of respective Districts. -2- '. '; Share of Joint Operating -Represents Districts share of operating and maintaining jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities, and administrative activities, distributed based on gallonage flow. (See Joint Operating Fund Statement) District Operating and Other Expenses -Consists primarily of individual Districts general operating expenses and operation, maintenance and repair of the respective District's collection system. JWS:ss Enclosures -3- . . . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SUMMARY JOINT OPERATING BUDGET REVIEW 6 MONTHS ENDED 12-31~72 SALARIES, WAGES & .BENEFITS Salaries & Wages · ~loyee Benefits '-"'sub-total Payroll Less: Chargebacks to Dists & CORF -Net Joint Operating Payroll MATERIALS, SUPPLIES & SERVICES Gasolirie, Oil & Fuel Insurance Of':fice Expense Operating Expense Chlorine & Odor Control Chemicals Chemical Coagulants Other Operating Supplies Contractual Se~vices Professional Services Printing & Publications Rents & Leases--Equipment Repairs & Maintenance Research & Monitoring Travel, Meeting & Training Utilities Other Expenses Prior Years Expenses ~Total Material & Supplies .. TOTAL JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE Less: Revenues NET JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE FLOW IN MILLION GALS GALLONAGE CHARGES 1 2 3 ~ 7 11 .. 3,207 MG 8,270 8,733 1,333 . 1,572 1,783 1 2 8~8 26,736 MG BUDGET 1972-73 . 2,011,806 ~16 2 918 2,328,724 7552000 1,573,724 25,000 25,5QO 16,ooo 75,000 118,b_OO 73,000 31,000 34,ooo 17-2500 3,000 155,000 198,500 10,000 219,500 4,500 15,000 1,020,500 2,594,224 160,000 2,434,224 YEAR TO DATE 876,567 1322181 1,011, 748 3 7 2~76 664,372 8,980 2~,659 ,712 16, 011 2,362 33,087 6,854 11,677 . 7' 19.4 245 77,328 80,718 6,291 102,741 847 12,204 394~910 1,059,282 69,285 - 989,997 GALLONAGE CHARGE 118,756 306,220 323,374 49,357 . 58, 206: 66 ,016 682068 989,997 REMAINING BUDGET 1,135,239 18l2Z3Z 2,i16 ,97~ 07 252 9092352 16,020· 1,841 11,288 58,989 115,-638. 39,913 24 ,146 22,323 10,306 2,755 77,672 117!'782 .. 3,709 116,759 3,653 ·2,796 625 2 290 1,534·,942 902715 1,444,227 ;~ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT December 31, 1972 BUDGET REVIEW Beginning Fund Balances, July lst ilwkNUES: Truces Federal and State Construction Grants Othe.r Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction Share of Joint Works Construction Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses Dis~rict Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, December 31st 1972-73 Budget 1,030,207 814,ooo 310,864 188~000 . 2,972,814 98,613 271,565 176,947 FACILITIES EXPANSION ~?TRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Contract 1-13 Warner Avenue Syphon Other District Projects Share of Joint Works Construction COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities . General Plant and Administrative, Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-72 3,457 3,457 878,287 . 881, 744 . 21,657 4,207,581 11,593 16,078 4,197,328 9,335,981 Year to Date . 1, 765,602 523,019 442,649 51,987 . 30,904 451,125 84,043 118,756 7,282 692;110 2,091,.~~7 1972-73 Additions 27,775 3,129 30,904 451,125 482,029 482,029 Remaining Budget 507,188 371,351 258,877 157,096 2,521,689. 14,570 152,809 169,665 Balance 12-31-72 27,775 6,586 34,361 1,329,412 1,363,773 . 21,657 4,207,581 11,593 16,078 4,197,328 9,818,010 .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT December 31, 1972 BUDGET REVIEW Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st imfENUES: Taxes .Federal and State Construction Grants Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction. Share of Joint Works Construction Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses 1972-73 Budget 4,364,442 2,556,000 1,,376, 078 10,465~000 . District Opera~ing & Other Expenditures 5,999,990 611,519 766,698 145,700 Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, December 31st FACILITIES EXPANSION C, .PTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: ~ Santa Ana River Interceptor Contracts Other Projects Share of Joint Works Construction COMPLETED PROPERTY~ PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative · Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance .• ~a-a ,__.6_-.-.,J0.._-_.,7..;;2_ 326,997 326~947 2275623 4 ,3,083,341 . 212,246 12,243,082 1,186 33,172 28,616 13, 172, 55l.J. 28,774,197 Remaining Year to Date Budget 10,536,319 2,211,004 2,153,438 1,389,173 1,166,827 874,214(1) 501,864 152010,710 356,904 1,415,710 154-, 090 --- 306,220 42,414 2·, 27!'.J ~ 338 12 rr35 ~e-,. 2 l ' 1-.. 1972-73 Additions 346,975 92929 ~56,904 12il52710 .1,772,614 1,772,614 10,108,096 4,584,280 457,429 460,478 103,286 Balance 12-31-72 673,972 92929 683,901 421722054 4,-855,955 212,246 12,243,082 1,186 33,172 28;616 13,172,554 30,546,811 (1) Including $228,697 on account of Chino Basin Capacity Rights in ~roject #2-ll and $378,184 on account of Anaheim Hills annexation payable in· installments beginning December, 1973 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT December 31, 1972 BUDGET REVIEW Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st MNUES: Truces Federal and State Construction Grants Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances . EXPENDITURES: District Construction Share of Joint Works Construction Bond Retirement and Interest Expens-e Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, December 31st 1972-73 Budget 5,661,421 2,927,000 898,000 11,289,000 6,804,647 857,000 792,258 317,600 FACILITIES EXPAMSION ... £,_,}TRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Share of Contract 3-17 Knott Interceptor Contract 3-17 (Reach 3) Knott Interceptor Other Projec-ts Share of Joint Works Construction COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines.and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-72 109,507 109,263 21,396 240,196 2,950,719 3,190,885 236,105 16,559,029 15,036 28,419 27,092 14,101,477 34,158,043 .. Year to Date 11,440,418 Remaining Budget 2,852,992 2,808,429 1,497,181 1,429,819 393.570(1) 504,.430 16,184,161 1,880,768 2,109,486(2) 196,353 323,374 48,522 4,558,503. 11,625,658 1972-73 Addi:tions 1,880,,768 9,408,232 4,695,161 660,647 468,884 269,078 Balance 12-31-72 1,542,494 462,143 116,297 2,I:~0,934 2, 109' 486 5 ,.060' 205 3,990,254 7,181,139 236,105 ·16,559,029 15,036 28,419 27,092 14,101,477 3,990,254 38,148,297 Including Annexation Fees .of $97,561 Including additional ~eparate equity purchase in I-8 of $594,500 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT December 31, 1972 BUDGET REVIEW Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st rr.,,,_zNUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction Share of Joint Works Construction Bond Retirement and Interest Expens_e Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures . Ending Fund Balances, December 31st 1972-73 Budget 707,040 511,000 304,250 837 ,ooo . 1,374,243 30,540 120,089 512,261 FACILITIES EXPANSION Cl""""CJTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: -~ Share of Contract 5-19 Coast Highway Force Main Other Projec-ts Share of Joint Works Construction COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines· and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities . Disposal Facilities General Plani and Administrative Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance ··:a-a _6_-_30_-_7_2_ 50,474 4,860 55,334 551,629 606,963 6,231 2,154,984 7,347 7,115 8,946 2,636,231 5,427,817 Remaining Year to Date Budget 1,267,018 373,374 278,016 ] 95., 955 285, 9·00 28"3, 050 25,187 49 357 176~021 819,515 1,294.848 1972-73 Add:i,tions 264,698 21,202 285,900 283,050 568,950 568,950 333,666 232,984 108,295 551,100 1,091,193 5,353 70 732 336~2z:i.o Balance 12-31-72 315,172 26,062 341,234 834,679 1,175,913 6,231 .. 2,154, 984 7,347 7,115 8,946 2,636,231 5,996,767 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT December 31, 1972 BUDGET REVIEW Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st JtiwkNUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction Share of Joint Works Construction Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, December 31st 1972-73 Budget 468,702 494,ooo 103,126 106,000 1,663,949 37,827 145,327 44,650 FACILITIES EXPANSION ~ /TRUCTION IN PROGRESS: ..... Share of Contract 5-19 Coast Highway Force Main Share of Joint Works Construction COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP~fENT: Land and P~operty Rights . Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance . ; 3.Jo...,_6_-..... 30_-_..7 ...... 2_ 2,994 532,731 535,725 562 526,802 2,653 7,394 23,743 2,545,921 3,642,800 Year to Date . 1,072, 295 235,153 268,492 29,804 1,605,744 15,702 273,815 31,289 58,266 8,215 387,227 1972-73 Addi.tions 15,702 273,815 289,517 I Remaining Budget 233,549 225,508 73,322 90,298 1, 390, 134· 6,538 87,121 36,435 Balance 12-31-72 825,242 562 526,802 2,653 . 7 ,394. 23,743 2,545,921 ... COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINAMCIP,L REPORT December 31, 1972 BUDGET REVIEW 1972-73 Remaining Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st MNUES: Truces Federal and State Construction Grants Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances . EXPENDITURES: District Construction Share of Joint Works Construction Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures . Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, December 31st 1,627,883 633,000 995,155 1,972,235 2,378,121 '584' !~47 171,667 310,425 FACILITIES EXPANSION Balance . : _.. _6.._-_3.:;..;;0.._-..... 7..-2_ ~ 7TRUCTION IN PROGRESS: ~ontract 7-5-lR West Relief Trunk 32,510 Contract 7..:6..:3 Sunflower/Redhill Reh. 3--5: .. 1,922,386 Contract 7-6-4 Redhill Interceptor 531,680 Other Projects 29,383 Share of Joint Works Construction COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines· and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilitfes General Plant and Administrative Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment 1,615,959 682,112 2,298,071 217,752 13,182,057 10,344 10,782 8,082 3,259,810 18,986,898 . 1, 976' 5 77 ( 1 ) 827,232 343,778 534,026 409,226 350,465 245,859 66,016 72,720 . 1,, 144,, 286 2,537,327 1972-73 Additions 285,677 i16,084 732 62733 409,.226 3502465 759,691 800,651 289,222 461,129 1,563,009 2,027,656 338,588 105,651 237,705 Balance 12-31-72 ·318,187 1,138,470 532,412 36,116 2,e25,185 1,032,577 3,057,762 217,752 . 13", 182, 057 10,344 10,782 8,082 3,259,810 759,691 19,746,589 (1) Adjusted to include unexpended 1970/71 Bond proceeds of $152,746 ... COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT DECEMBER 31, 1972 BUDGET REVIEW Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st Rw£NUES: .Truces Federal and State Construction Grants Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction Share of Joint Works Construction Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses .District Operating & Other Expenditures . Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, December 31st 1972-73 Budget 973,274 606,000 .129,650 1,312,000 2,136,032 103,535 166,620 130,700 FACILITIES EXPANSION Balance .--a _6_-....,30_-..... z_..2_ C~._jTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Share 9f Contract 3-17 Knott Interceptor Share of Joint Works Construction 1 T,3H4 · 647,016 COMPLETED PROPERTY2 PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Sta'tions Treatment Facilitiea Dlsposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative· Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment 6h4,4oo 16,936 2,696,831 3,053 17,116 3,092,008 6,490,424 Remaining Year to Date Budget 2,346,028 506,615 326,090 69, 314 3,248,047 227;485 422,801 32,717 68,068 55,942 807 ,(H3 2,441,034 1972-73 Additions 466,659 279,910 60,336 1,084,515 . 1, 713,231 70,808 98,552 74,758 Balance 12-31-72 :. 2~i ,~4-85 244, 869 422,801(1) 1,069,817 650,286 650,286 1,314 ,686 16,936 2,696' 831 3,053 1'7' 116 3,092.088 7,140,710 (1) Including additional separate equity purchase in I-8 of $94,500 \ \ J \ \ • <\ ....... , I \ ---"· ----., --· ---· '\ ' ~ , ,.. / ... · , /,, ( , ~~ -... J ' / / ' ,, .. , J' r . . r I y District 2 Boundary _ l~ r,· ·---.... i l , • I 4,, ' I ._. l ./"" / ,, I I / ,, I • • (.,_ I -' "' r-<- """' BM --~ L __ ::":::::; __ .. ~x J ~ !tr ~61 :i-.. ' • C'-:i~ ~ l.. • 00,..; ...., --,/ . -----C._\ _____ _ '•' : ·1 ,I . ' .·I ,J E s A N .- MILLER, NISSON ~ KOGLER CL:ARK MILLER TELEPHONE C. ARTHUR NISSON "'ELS:>!'' KOGLER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2014 NORTH BROAOWAY SANTA ANA, CAUFOR..NIA 92706 AREA CODE 714 H. LAWSON M EAO January 26, 1973 Mr. Fred Harper General Manager Orange County Sanitation Districts Post Off ice Box 8127 Fountain Valley~ California 92708 Re: Memorandum re County Grand Jury Duties and Powers Dear Mr. Harper: Generally speaking, the powers and duties of the Grand Jury are described in Chapter 3 of the California Penal Code, commencing with §914. Article 2 of Chapter 3 is entitled "Investigation of County and District Affairs". Pertinent provisions of Article 2 with reference to County Sanitation Districts are as follows: "§933.5 [Examination of books and records of special purpose assessing or taxing district wholly or partly within county] A grand jury may at any time examine the·books aaJ records of any special-purpose assessing or taxing district located wholly or partly in the county, and, in addition to any other investigatory powers granted by this chapter, may investigate and report upon the method or system of performing the duties of such district." This section appears to give the Grand Jury sufficient authority to investigate and report on County Sanitation Districts. With reference to the effect of such repo~t, Penal Code §933 appears to provide the answer .. It reads as follows: "933 [Grand jury's ·findings and reconunendations: Conunent by board of supervisors: Report of county officer: Filing] "On or before December 31 of each year, each grand jury impaneled during that calendar year shall submit to the presiding judge of the superior court a final report of its ·findings and recommendations that pertain to county government. .... '· .... . Mr. Fred Harper -2-~anuary 26, 1973 "No later than the 60th day after the discharge of said grand jury, the board of supervisors shall comment on the findings and recommendations of a grand jury that pertain to county government matters under the control of the board and every elective county officer shall ·report to the board of supervisors on the findings and recommendations pertaining to such county officer. All such comments and reports shall forthwith be submitted to the presiding judge of the superior court who impaneled the grand jury for the previous calendar year. A copy thereof shall be placed on file with the county clerk and shall remain on file in the off ice of the county clerk." It would appear that 933 does not require any action on the part of the Sanitation Districts in that the Districts are not under the jurisdiction of the board of supervisors. Likewise, there is no elective county officer who would have the duty to report on recommendations of the Grand Jury pertain- ing to County Sanitation Districts. If the Districts wish to respond to the report made by the 1972 Grand Jury pertaining to the conduct of the Districts' affairs, I think such a report should point out that although consolidation of the Districts into one District is legally permissible, there is no way to reduce the number of Directors to 5 or 10 in number.without new legislation. If such a report is made on behalf of the Sanitation Districts, it should be submitted to the Presiding Judge of the Su~erior Court and a copy placed on file with the County Clerk. I 1.o not regard this as a mandat9ry requirement •... . . -.. _ .. , If anyone is interested in any more detailed analysis of the California Grand Jury system, an article in Vol. 43 of the California Law Review at page 251 devotes 17 pages to tracing the historical origins and development of the Grand Jury in California. Emphasis is primarily on the judicial duties of the Grand Jury which are to investigate and bring to prosecution all crimes discovered or known about in the county. Perhaps a comment from the. conclusion of that article would be of benefit: "The California Grand Jury is endowed with broad powers as an inquisitorial and judicial body, but it is enjoined to exercise those powers with mature discretion. It is not to engage in 'fishing expeditions', that is, initiate investigations not specifically enjoined upon it ; / :it • ·:. : . .; ' . .. -~~ ·-.... ,• _:.-7·. ~- .• '.!' Mr. Fred Harper -3-January 26, 1973 without probable 9ause, nor is it .to attempt to act as a supervising administrative agency controlling the discretionary activities of public officers." Historical and Legal Aspects of the California Grand Jury System, 43 C.L.R. 251, 267 CAN:ac. Very truly yours, c. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel EXCERPTED FROM "SEA SECRETS" (AN EDUCATIONAL SERVICE OF THE INTERNATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC FOUNDATION) NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 1972 METAI~S IN MUD The existence of massive heavy metal deposits at Jeast 1,400 miles long and 300 miles wide on the South Pacific Ocean floor has been reported by Dr. James L. Bischoff of the Uni- versity of Southern California. The metals include iron, manganese, cop- per, zinc, and barium. They are com- bined in mud below the 12,000-foot depth in waters between the Galapagos Islands at the Equator on the no~th and Easter Island on the south. Evi- dence of heavy metal deposits in the South Pacific area was first discovered in 1966, but the vast extent of the metal-rich mud was not known until a recent expedition aboard the Soviet re- search vcssei Dmitry Mendeleev. The deposits arc on the flanks of the East Pacific Rise, a chain of undersea mountains which nms in a northeast- erly direction across the South Pacific and terminates in the Gulf of Califor- nia. Along this ocean floor ridge, new crust constantly is being forn .ed by molten material oozing up fr< '.n the interior of the earth. Prcsum tL! y, the metal deposit formation is associated with this process. Despite the vast area of the ~cposits, ·mining or extraction of them probably · will not be economically feasible be- . cause no one metal is present in suf- ficiently rich quantity in the mud, according to Bischoff. The heavy metal deposits will, .however. be of substan- tial· and continuing interest to geolo- gists and other scie•Hists because they are ~till in the process of formation and provide a valuable opportunity for study of the metal formation process., Scientists will have an opportunity to: trace the process in "slow motion," a~· ~ the deposits accumulate at the rate of about V.. inch per thousand years. Another area of interest is in the possible role that the deposits might have in the regulation of the chemical composition of seawater. It is thought that such inorganic processes might have some influence in maintaining delicate chS!mical balances that make the oceans a viable habitat for li'r:ing organisms. Soviet expedition chief, Dr. A. P. Lisitzin, invited Bischoff to plot the course between Callao, Peru, and Eas- ter Island, because of his experience in locating heavy metal deposits. Bischoff · did so and established close working relationships with the Russian scien-· tists in sampling and studying the samples taken from the ocean floor. r J v RESOLUT~ONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS FebrJary 14, 1973 -7:30 p.m. . I WARRANT NO. 19616 19617 19618 19619 . 1620 ~~621 19622 19623 19624 19625 19626 19627 19628 19629 19630 19631 19632 19633 19634 19635 19636 19637 19638 19639 19640 19641 19642 ..... r1,,.. 1\)--t..) ~644 19645 19646 19647 19648 19649 19650 19651 1'9652 19653 19654 19655 19656 19657 19658 19659 19660 19661 19662 19663 19664 19665 19666 19667 -1668 ~669 ]_9670 19671 19672 19673 19674 19675 19676 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF All Bearing Service, Inc., Bushings Allied Supply Company, Pipe Supplies American Compressor Co., Compressor Parts City of Anaheim, Power Apco Supply, Pipe Supplies & Motor Associated Concrete Products, Inc., Manhole Covers & Rings Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, 1973 Membership Barksdale Controls Division, Controls Bearing Specialty C0., Couplings & Bearings Bell Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies James Benzie, Employee Mileage Brinkmann Instruments, Inc., Lab Supplies Bristol Park Medical Group, Pre-employment Exams Broadlick Art Supply, Drafting Supplies Bruning Division, Drafting Supplies CPS Co., Photo Services C & R Reconditioning Co., Engine Repair Cal's Cameras, Photo Supplies California Association of Sanitation Agencies, 1973 Membership.& Conference Registration California Distributors, Tools Chemtech Industries, Inc., Janitorial Supplies Chicago Pneumatic, Compressor Parts Brian Chuchua's, Truck Parts Clayton Manufacturing Company, Chemicals Coast Winslow Filter Corp., Filters College Lumber Company, Inc., Building Materials Consolidated Electrical Distr., Electrical Supplies Con::> l,J:u(; l,o.c·t-; Supply Company, Tools Paul A. Cooper, Grit Removal Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts County of Orange, Maps Clarence s. Cummings, Employee Mileage Curtin Scientific Company, Lab Supplies Daniels Tire Service, Truck Tires Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling Diesel Control~Corp., Filters Dominguez Marine & Industrial, Pipe Supplies & Valves Dresser Manufacturing Division, Gaskets Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Ecomatics, Chlorniation Controls Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Rsch. & Monitoring (MO 12-14-66) Fibre Glass Evercoat Co., Test Materials Fischer &·Porter Co., Valves Fisher Controls Co., Compressor Parts The Flag Shop, Flags · William H. Fox, ~mployee Mileage The Foxboro Company, Tools City of Fullerton, Water Garden Grove Lumbe~ & Cement, Building Materials Gasket Manufacturing Co., Gaskets General Binding Corp., Specification Supplies General Electric Supply, Electrical Supplies General Telephone Company Georgia Pacific Co!~., Chlorine George T. Hall Company, Engine Parts Halstead & Hog~an, Inc., Pump Parts Harbor Fire Protection, Fire Suppression.Supplies Harrlngton Industrial Plastics, Inc., Plastic Pipe w.c. Hendrie & Company, Hardware Honeywell, Strip Charts Howard Suµply Company, Pipe ~~pplies, Valves & Gauges A-1 AMOUNT 40.05 263.80 678.75 15.00 245.91 188.55 1,300.00 926.17 160.05 374.07 24.42 20.28 12.50 41.29 135.73 22.38 90.00 22.89 1,550.00 83.48 63.00 995.02 5.57 38.85 209.33 256.07 530.16 174.22 768.00 438.35 12.00 52.26 481073 78.92 55.60 145.82 338011 77 .36 715.62 1,134.oo 2,400.00 106.34 186.06 82.39 67.20 36.90 26.61 4.87 188.90 156.47 36.12 861.92 2,046.oo 4,023.39 219.32 185.68 408.08 1,278.00 137.03 160.80 1,518.46 WARRANT NO. 19677 19678 19679 19680 19681 19682 . 1683 -' ~684 19685 19686 19687 19688 19689 19690 19691 19692 .19693 19694 19695 19696 19697 19698 19699 19700 ·19701 19702 19703 19704 19705 19706 19707 1708 ~709 19710 19711 19712 19713 19714 19715 19716 19717 19718 19719 19720 19721 19722 19723 ·19724 i9725 19726 19727 19728 19729 19730 19731 19732 "'q733 LJ734 ~9735 19736 19737 19738 19739 19740 IN FAVOR OF City of Huntington Beach, Water $ Huntington Valley Press, .t-:1orms . _ Industrial Water Conditioning, Laboratory Water Inland Nut & Bolt Co., Hardware International Harvester Co., Truck Parts Jet Print, Printing Johnston Pump Company, Pump Repair Kahl Scientific Instrument Corp., Instrumentation Keeler Advertising Specialties, Calendars Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Valves Kelly Pipe Company, Pipe Supplies Key Metals, Inc., Refund Scrap Sale Deposit King Bearing, Inc., Seals, Brgs., V-Belts & Bushings S.P. Kinney Engineers, Inc., Odor Control Equipment Kleen Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tools & Hardware L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Rental Judy Lee, Employee Mileage Lewis Brothers Battery, Truck Parts & Batteries Link Belt .Material Handling_ Division, Shaker Parts Mc Calla Brothers, Pump Parts R.W. Mc Clellan & Sons, Paving Materials John Mc Cullough, Employee Mileage Majestic Fasteners Co., Hardware Marine Biological Consultants, Ocean Ecology Research Marvin Supply Company, Rope Matheson Scientific, Lab Supplies Mesa Supply, Truck Parts : Mettler Instrument Corp., Equipment Repair Mitchell Manuals, Inc., Service Manual M,...,,.u, _,.,~ T_..,,.... Rose!l-rach <:!11-nn1 ~ r.-c:t • Vt:> ..t.. _....,~, ~;.,) -_. ......,.._ •• • ..._,\A~ l:"'...__.._,.....,, Mueller Company, Valve Parts Nate's Saw & Lawnmower Shop, Inc., Saw Sharpening National Lumber & Supply Co., Building Materials City of Newport. Beach, Water Newport Marine Supply Co., Hardware Newport Skywaya, Inc., Aerial.Photo..graphy c. Arthur Nissen, General Counsel Retainer Noland Paper Company, Inc., Paper Oakite Products, Inc., Cleaners Ohmart Corp., Metering Supplies City of Orange, Water Orange County Radiotelephone Pacific Telephone Co. Pall Trinity Micro Corp., Compressor Parts Ron Parker, Employee Mileage Norman Parsons, Employee Mileage Porter Boiler Service, Boiler Repair & Equip. Rental Postmaster, Postage Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage Red Valve Company, Inc., Freight & Valve Parts Relief Control Valve Mtce., Valve Repair Jack H. Ross, Employee Mileage Rucker Products, Incinerator Parts Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Supplies Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Rewind Santa Ana Electronics Co., Electrical Supplies Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Lab Supplies Seaboard Supply Company, Protective Coating City of Seal Beach, Water See Optics, Safety Glasses S.F. Serrantino, Employee Mileage The Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies A-2 AMOUNT 7.42 142.54 40.00 663.25 78.82 118.65 951.00 813.75 9.20 626.54 868.93 38.97 220.99 1, 585.00 . 129 .57 301081 768.73 1,645.83 25.98 254.68 588.69 181.86 57 .75 146.10 699.94 1,210.75 95.77 282.63 202.02 137.87 18.90 47.33 62.85 8.85 39.07 21.29 18.75 33.30 700.00 302.48 99.91 507.04 28.65 74.19 391.43 . 99068 7.20 7.80 1,137.76 500.00 41.10 . 389 .90 180.00 27.18 279.93 7o42 188.57 43.41 44010 64.19 26.99 61.16 44.34 421.00 WARRANT NO. 19741 19742 19743 19744 19745 19746 . 1747 ...;748 .,; 19749 19750 19751 19752 19753 19754 19755 19756 197·57 19758 19759 19760 19761 19762 19763 19764 19765 19766 19767 19768 19769 19770 19771 -1772 ~773 19774 19775 19776 19777 19778 ·19779 19780 19781 19782 19783 19784 19785 19786 .. r:1787 L )788 ~9789 19790 19791 19792 19793 19794 IN FAVOR OF A.H. Shipkey, Inc., Truck Tires $ John Sigler, Employee Mil0age & WPCF Conference Exp. South Orange Supply, Hardware & Pipe Supplies Southern California Edison Southern Cali~ornia Gas Co. Southern California Water Co. Southern Marine Supply, Hardware Sparkletts, Bottled Water Sparling, Electrical Supplies Speed-E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Oil Company, Coating, Gasoline & Oil John W. Stang Corp., Pump Sully Miller Contracting Co., Paving Materials Sun Electric Corp., Electrical Supplies Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage Tinker & Rasor, Equipment Rental Tustin Water Works, Water Harry L. Twining, Employee Mileage U.S. Equipment Co., Inc., Compressor Parts. Union Oil, Gas6line United Reprographics, Inc., Printing Utilities Supply Co., Tools VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies Vaniman Camera, Photo Supplies & Processing John Waples, Odor Consultant Warren &.Bailey Co., Hardware Water Pollution Control Federation, Conference Expense Waukesha Engine Se~vicenter, Inc., Engin.e Parts Robert A. Webber, Employee Mileage : Worthington Service Corp., Compressor Parts Donald Wright, Employee Mileage Xerox Corp., Reproduction Sc~~icc Fab.co, Administration -Engineering Building Draperies Fred A. Harper, Various Mtg. & COD Expenses J. Wayne Sylvester, CASA & WPCF Workshop Expense AMOUNT 476.25 41.95 635.66 26,233.93 . 3, 598. 73 3.65 20.70 60.29 35.28 424.60 2,580.69 339.70 331.23 14.02 32.46 81.90 12.11 9.30 176.30 .42.39 402.47 66.14 134.67 72.66 214.10 141.79 88.oo 370.11 49.26 190.41 71.22 875.60 2,090.61 161.06 31.70 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING $ 85,827.60 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Bassett Office Furniture Co., Office Equipment '$ 599.10 California Distributors, Tools . 286.28 Carollo & Keith, Engineering Service I-8-3 19,700.00 John Carollo Engineers, Engineering-Plant Constr. 51,051.72 E.T.I. & Kordick, Contractor I-8-3 & P2-ll-l 226,137.80 James E. Hoagland Co. & Hoagland Engineering Co., Contractor Pl-9-1 83,151.90 Jet Print, Technical Report · 70.88 LBWS, Inc., Machine Tools 475.60 County of Orange, Compaction Test I-8 64.75 Osborne l:.aboratories, Inc., Testing I-8-3 687.50 Reed Electric Sales & Supply, Heaters 638.85 Sirco Controls, Sampler Freight ,. 73.50 Taylor Dunn, Electric Carts A-063 (MO 12-13-J2) 9,032.63 Tinker & Rasor, Test Equipment 800.63 Three G's Concrete Construction Co., Tools 300.00 Twining Laboratories, Testing I-8-3 & Pl-9-1 591.30 United Reprographics, Inc., Plans & Specs J-13 1,102.50 Utilities Supply Co., Drill Press 298.63 F.T. Ziebarth and Ziebarth & Alper. Contractor J-4-1 --~-!~~,992000 TOTA~ CAPI~AL OUTLAY REVOLVING $ 439,055.57 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING. & CORF $ 521~,883.17 A-3 DISTRICT NO. 2 WARRANT NO. ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 19795 19796 19797 10798 .. ·99 _,)~ 19800 19801 19802 19803 19804 19805 19806 Lowry & Associates, Engineerir1.g Service 2-14-lA, 2-14-2, 2-15, 2-16, 2-17 & 2-18 County of Orange, Compaction Test 2-14-1. Osborne Laboratories, Pipe Testing 2-14-1 Everett S. Schmid, Right of Way Appraiser 2-14-1 Sully Miller Contracting Co., Contractor 2-14-1 DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engr. Service, Connection Fee Study & Waste Water Disposal Line Study County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, Inter-District Sewer Use ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engr. Serv. 3-12-1 & 3-17 DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Survey 3-17 County of Orange, Compaction Test 3-17 Osborne Laboratories, Pipe Testing 3-17 J. F. Shea Co., Inc., Contractor 3-17 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF .AMOUNT 40,840.50 159.49 912.50 1,470.00 240,755.85 $ 284,138.34 $ $ 598.25 1,049.05 1,647.30 8,775.75 10,423.05 1,533.25 255.74 . 1,175.00 . 309' 27 6. 00. $ 312,239.99 19807 19808 : 109 County of Orange, Compaction Test 5-19 $ 298.68 100.00 69,081.79 Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Pipe Testing 5-19 A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Co., Con tr. 5-·i9 ~ $ 69,480.47 (B) DISTRICT NO. 7 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 19810 Bo-Mar Construction Company, Contr. 7-5-lR 19811 Boyle Engineering, Survey 7-5-lR 19812 Esther Havens & Louis A. Havens, Right of Way 7-5-lR 19813 County of Orange, Compaction Test 7-5-lR. (C) AMOUNT $ 83,785.50 1,464.oo 609.00 675.53 $ 86,534.03 ,. . January 24, 1973 ...... Mr. Ray E. Lewis Deputy Chief Engineer County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Calif~rnia P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92 70 8 PROPOSAL FOR CONSULTING ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES. FOR DISTRICTS' PROPOSED 46 MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE . TREATMENT F AGILITIES Dear Mr. Lewis: We appreciate the opportunity to submit a proposal to provide the necessary consulting architectural services as requi!ed by the Districts to insure compliance with State and Federal regulations and to coordinate the activities of the design engineer to produce an aesthetically pleasing facility. Inasmuch as it is difficult to define accurately the scope of the service at this time, we agree ·with your recommendation that the compensation for services shall be on a time and material cost. We propose two methods of compensation for the above required architectural services on a time and material cost. One is two and one-half (2. 5) times the direct labor cost of each person working on_ the pr0ject, to be billed mpnthly. The second 'method is two and one-half (2. 5) times an hourly rate on a per diem ra.te schedule per classification, to be billed monthly. The schedule is attached. Other exp .. enses such as printing, etc., shall be at an actual invoice cost plus a 15% service charge, or as per agreed upon. I am enc.losing a brochure that includes information pertaining to our firm. We are most interested in being.of service to the County Sanitation District and are familiar with working under these conditions. Our firm has been Master Planners for t~e Jet Propulsion Laboratory.for the.past six· years on ':1-time and material compensation. I have been assigned as the Supervisil').g Architect for JPL.and have been a member of the JPL Maste_r Planning Board for the past six years. _Besides being commissioned to do numerous architectural and engineering projects for JPL, our firm has done the ~rchitectural design of the following projects 508 North rviain Street· Santa Ana, California 92701 ·Telephone (714).835-231.~ ·,~,l Chicago. Illinois . Honolulu, Hawa11 ,:·.)'-~ a::..:: .. 11 GRILLIAS • PIRC • ROSIER• ALVES 0 PLANNING• ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING ll ts:; _ _LJJ Agenda Item #9(b) D-1 All Districts Mr. Ray E. Lewis Deputy Chief Engineer January 24, 1973 Page Two at JPL that other engineering firms had been commissioned as the prime contractor, such as: The Spacecraft Assembly Facility, The Isotope Thermo-Electric Systems Application Laboratory, The Uninterrupted Power Plant and the JPL Arroyo-Seco Bridge. The arrangement proved very satisfactory. We worked well and closely with the various engineering firms that were commissioned for these projects. Because we are an architectural and engineering firm, we better understand the importance· of good coordination between architec't and engineer and client~ If you wish to contact some of our clients personally, the following names are supplied: Mr. Brian 0. Sparks Manager Facilities &: Fabrication Services Office Jet Propulsion Laboratory · 4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena, California 91103 (213) 354-6250 Mr. Joseph Smisek Director of Building Services County of Orange 628 North Sycamore Street Santa· Ana, Ca.lifornia 92701 (714) 834-3121 Mr. Anthony D. Lazzaro Vice President, Business Affairs University of Southern California University Park Los Angeles, California 90007 ·Mr. Cles Wiseman Senior Architect , I Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California 91770 (213) 572-1894 • 508 North Main Street· Santa Ana, California 92701 • Telephone (714) 835-2311 ~!e~~ Chicago, Illinois Honolulu, Hawaii .·,_,..J .... ·j GRILLIAS • PIRC • ROSIER• ALVES 0 PLANNING• ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING ~ Agenda Item #9(b) D-2 All Districts , Mr. Ray E. Lewis Deputy Chief Engineer January 24, 1973 Page Three Mr. Roddy Rhoades Project Engineer Kraft Foods . . 6950 Artesia Avenue Buena Park, California 90620 (714) 521-0640 We are most willing to discuss our proposal w~th you at your convenience. If there is any further information required, please contact us. Sincerely, GRILLIAS . PIRC . ROSIER . ALVES S. P. Grillias, AIA SPG:kms 508 North Main Street• Santa Ana, California 92701 • Telephone (714) 835-2311 Chicago, Illinois Honolulu, Ha'\vaii GRILLIAS • PIRC • ROSIER• ALVES 0 PLANNING • ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING Agenda Item #9(b) D-3 All Districts Mr. Ray E. Lewis Deputy Chief Engineer January 24, 1973 Page Four PER DIEM RATE SCHEDULE/CLASSIFICATION Classification Designer Jr. Designer Planner Project Architect J<;>b Captain Architectural Sr. Drafts man Architectural Jr. Drafts man Structural Engineer Sr. Structural Draftsman Jr. Structural Draftsman M~chanical Engineer Electrical Engineer . Mechanical Draftsman Electrical Draftsman Specification Writer Cost Estimate Hourly Rate $8. 75 5. 50 7. 75 8. 75 7. so 7.00 5.00 10.00 7.25 5.50 7 •. 75 . 7. 75 6.75 6. !jO 7. 00 6.00 Rate for Principal of ~irm is $30. 00 per houi;-. • 2. 5 x Hourly Rate $21. 88 13. 75 19.38 21. 88 18. 75 17. 50 12.50 25.00 18. 13 13. 75 19.38 19.38 16.88 16.25 17. 50 15. 00 50~ North Main Street • Santa Ana, California 92701 • Telephone (714) 835-231~ r~·~l Chicago, Illinois Honolulu, Ha·wah :·1 ~ ~11 GRILLIAS • PIRC • ROSIER• ALVES 0 PLANNING •ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING h !~J Agenda Item #9(b) D-4 All Districts A.W. RUTAN (1680•t9721 JAMES e. TuC•Cq, SA,(•IUIS•li>SOI MILP'OAO W. O.:.HL MIV'OAD W. DAHL.JR, tfr.PMA .. H.SNC:>EG#AllO THOMAS P, BUAKC: ':IOOER HOWELL J,NICHOLAS COUHfl:R :tr '-t .. s,. ~~~~;~~!'~.,c• . .IAMCS. R.MOOAC HCR1U:: .. t w. WAL" CR ROBERT L, RISLEY fOCIC £. TOCCA P'AITZ Ill. STRADLING MARAT .J, KCATON PAC:L niEOl:RIC: MARX HO .. CA L. McCOPNIC:K,JR. EDMUND R,CASCY HOWARD P'. HARllllSON J4MCS C. £RICKSON JOHN M. VINCCNT WILLIAM A. 81£:. RICH A AD A, CURNUTT LEONAlllD A, HAMPEL JOHN B, HURLBUT, JR. MICHAEL W. IMMELL THEOOORC I. WALLACE, JR, ••1t1 !••M (" C\f'"''~ COLLEEN M.CLAIRE AOloALO P. ARRU(GTON STUART T. "#ALORIP C. RICHARD LCMON llllC'fARO P, SIMS C:. CRAIG CARI.SO"' JOH.., J, MURPHY WILLIAM A. RAUTH m M, STEPHEN COONTZ PACNTICE A, FISH ROBERT C. BRAUN GERALD._., HALLIGAN OAVIO C. AOSENOAUM COWARD 0. STBESMA, JR. ALU: .IEF'F'REY GLASSER DAVID P. BERGLAND 01' COUNSCL W. K, LINDSAY CVCRETT A. MART RUTAN & TUCKER ATTORNEYS AT L,AW TH£ BANK OF CALI F'ORN IA BUILDING 401 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST POST OFFICE BOX 1976 SANTA ANA.CALIF"ORNIA 92~02 t714) 835·2200 January 16, 1973 ~-Robert Finnell, Chairman Sanitation Districts Post Off ice Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. Finnell: LOS ANG£L£S Of'f'tCE SUITE 1922 CITT NATIONAL BANK BUILDING soe SOUTH OLIVE STREET LOS ANG!:LES, CA!.lf"~RNIA 90C!4 TELEPHONE (213) 520·0482 LAGUNA HILLS OF'f'ICE 23521 PA.SEO DE './'ALENCIA, SUITC 300 LAGUNA HILLS. CA1.iFORNIA 92653 TELEPHONE (7141 835•2200 ANAHEIM OFFICE SUITE 812 BANK OF AMER'CA BUILDING 300 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92805 TELEPHONE (714) 835•2200 IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO Per our conversation the latter part of December, I am herewith submitting information to you concerning the hou=ly r~te thut would be involved for work by our firill iu connection with the breach of contract action involving· Peter Kewitt. We will undertake this matter on behalf of the Sani- tation Districts at the rate of $70.00 per hour for my time going down to a minimum of $30.00 and· $35.00 per hour for the researchers. It is specifically understood that I would handle the trial of this i:.atter myself and· will, of course, closely supervise the pr~~aration of the case, including any pretrial discovery such a~ depositions, etc. However, I can secure assistance from those under me in the Department in connection with matters such as depositions, preliminary hearings, research, etc. Thank you very much for calling me in connection with this case. Yours very truly, .......... GJ·'b :red ·---·--·:"' Agenda Item #13 -E-· All Districts ~ February 9, 1973 ~~ REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF JOINT STAFF MANAGEMENT/EMPLOYEE COMMITTEE ON ALTERNATE GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 A Joint Committee, representing the Orange County Employees Association membership and the Districts' management, was formed during the 1972 meet and confer sessions on salaries and fringe benefits to study the feasibility of providing the employees with a prepaid health care plan as an alternative choice to the existing group health insurance plan. The basic conceptual diff'erence between the two programs is a·s f'ollows: Health Insurance -This plan provides for reimbursement to the patient for medical and hospitalization expenses, after the costs have been incurred. Prepaid Heal th Plan -Commonly refe.rred to as an HMO plan (health maintenance organization) this approach emphasizes clinical services wherein the patient receives. his medical attention at • the organization's clinic or contract hospital. All services are essentially covered by the monthly premium. '-"' Early in the Conmuttee's study, it was determined that if an alternate health care plan were to be provided, it should be at least comparable to the Districts existin.g group insurance plan. Four health maintenance organizations were contacted by the Committee: Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.; Ross-Loos Medical Group; Family Health Program, Ir.c.; and California Medical Group, Inc. -We were informed Kaiser Foundati0n is not accepting new groups and has not written a new contract in this area since 1965. The Ross-Loos Medical Group was eliminated froill consideration because their closest hospital racility is Queen of Angels in Los Angeles. Specifications were prepared outlining the type of program which was deemed necessary to provide an adequate alternative health plan· :ror employees and their families. On January 16th~ formal proposals were received from Family Health Program, Inc. and California Medical Group, Inc. The committee met on several occasions with representatives o:r Family Health Program, Inc. and California Medica1·aroup, Inc. to discuss their, capabilities and fa_cilities, for providing an HMO. plan. The proposals have been evaluated and re.viewed with the representa- tives of the repsecti ve organizations. It is .the Committee's recommenda- tion that the plan submitted by Family Health Program, Inc. be approved as an alternate group medical program for Districts employees effective March 1, 1973. Committee members have visited the facilities of FHP in Fountain Valley and they appear adequate. There will be no additional cost to the Districts for ·providing this alternate Health plan; however it will give our employees a choice. r Agenda Item #14 -F-All Districts PROGRESS REPORrr TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 P2-ll-l -HEADWORKS "C" EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2 ($1,228,000) New main sewage pumps: Engines, pumps and major piping insta11·ed. Support piping, controls and electrification underway. New bar screens: Screens and drives· in place. Grouting, coat- ing and electrification underway. New grit chambers: Concrete construction and piping essentially complete. Installation of plastic lining, sluice gates, grit washings conveyors, and mechanical equipment underway. New meter vault: Concrete construction essentially complete. Installing large diameter meter pipi~g and foul air ducting. Foul air scrubber: Fiberglass tower piped and erected and mechanical equipment installed. Piping, electrification, ducting, and control instaJla.tion underway. Operational completion anticipated this month. · Rehabilitation of Headworks "B": Not scheduled to start until all new facets of Headworks 11 c 11 are operational. Contract approximately 84 ~ercent complete to date • • I-8-3 -INFLUENT METERING AND DIVERSION STRUCTURE ($1,374,878) Inl'luent channel: Concrete channel 80 percent complete. Influent piping: Sunflower, Santa Ana.River and Euclid Trunks extended to structure. Metering and diversion structure: Excavated for the structure to the ground w~ter table. Flood protection wall: Complete"ex~ept for opening at Well No. 1 and the Sahta Ana River Trunk. Contract approximately'25 percent complete to date, P2-20 -POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT PLANT NO. 2 ($158,294) \,,,,,' Contractor is submitting details of all proposed electrical equipment to be included for evaluation by.the Districts' engineers. P2-21 -DIGESTERS N & 0 AT PLANT NO. 2 ($1~068,413) Contractor just moved on to job site. Beginning excavation for digesters and control building. Agenda Item #16 G..;.l All Districts Progress Report Page Two February 7, 1973 Pl-9-1 -ADDITIONAL SECONDARY TREATMENT AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 ($786,300) Gas compressor: Proposed equipment being evaluated. New incinerator, conveyor and rams: Foundation for incinerator and power ducts installed. Evaluating equipment to be included. Plant Water Pump Station: Concrete s·tructure essentially com-· plete. Installing underground piping. Tunnel piping and service to headworks installed. Trickling Filter: Base, underground piping and s.tructural, effluent and influent structure constructed. Construction of slab underway. City Well Water Pump Station: Slabs, power ducts, curbs and underground piping constructed. New well: Well drilled to 560-foot depth. Casing and gravel installed to 530 feet. To be de~eloped as soon as possible. Contract approximately 21 percent complete to date. J-4-1 -INCREASED WATER REUSE FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2 ($611",0~0) City Water Pump Station: Base, walls, underground piping, water and drain connections, tunnel piping and power ducts completed. Roof framing, stucco and inside piping scheduled. Chlorine Water Pump Statio~: Underground piping, electrical relocations, drain and water connections and excavation complete. Beginning sheet piling for walls. Plant Water Pump Station: Slab and ducting for electrical room constructed. Check valves at Rothrock.Booster Station equipment ordered~ Contract approximately 10 percent complete to date. J-7-2 -ADMINISTRATION-ENGINEERING BUILDING ADDITION ($237,600) . ' . . Project complete except for heating!air conditioning system and minor items requirihg ~nstallation. Contract approximately 99 percent complete to date·~ J-13 -SHOPS AND WAREHOUSES (·$810, 000 Estimate) Plans available to bidders as of February·5, 1973. Bids to be received March 6, 1973. Agenda Item #16 G-2 All Districts • Progress Report · Page Three February 7, 1973 TREATMENT PLANT WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During January Total Work Out for Bid Total Work Under Design DISTRICT SEWER WORK Total Amount Under Contract Total·Work to Date Total Work During January Total Work Under Design ' . Agenda Item #16 G-3 $ 5,494,ooo 1,901,000 384,ooo 810,-000 23,000,000 $14,582,772 3;490,575 730,466 9,500,000 .. (Estimated) (Estimated) All Districts To: From: Subj~ct: M.E M 0 RAND UM February 9, 1973 Fred A. Harper, General Manager COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108..C..C ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71.C) 540-2910 (7t.C) 962-2411 Robert ·A. Webber, Chief of Industrial & Pennit Division Acceptance of Construction Dewatering by Metropolitan Water District from Areas Outside District By the attached letter dated January 26, 1973, the Metropolitan Water District has requested the Districts acceptance of con- struction dewatering associated with construction of a feeder line transmitting state project water to the Diemer Filtration ~lant in Yorba Linda. Although the Districts have accepted construction ground water, assuming adequate capacity in the trunk facilities, a portion of this construction project falls not only out of the District boundaries, but extends through·Orange County and into Los Angeles County as well. The attached map, indicating the extent of the construction project, shows approximately 7500 feet lying north- easterly of the District No. 2 boundary and extending an additional 8500 feet ·into the County of Los Angeles. Their request for acceptance by the Districts has been precipitated by discharge limitations imposed by the California ·Regional Water Quality Control Board limiting discharge to the national watercourse to 2000 micromhos. ·Previous geological exploration indicates conductivities may vary from 1600 to 4400 micromhos which would require N.W.D. to seek alternative methods of disposal other than the natural watercourse. . . We have evaluated the ·capacity in the District No. 2 facilities to accommodate their projected 150,00Q gallons per day and, finding sufficient capacity available, it is recommended their request for a temporary permit be granted ... · This permit would expire at the completion of the construction project., Although the District gallonage charge for construction dewater- ing has been established at· $250 per million gallons, the Districts, by contractual agreement with Waste Water Disposal Company, charge $350 per million gallons for waters originating out of the District. Consistent with the agreement, it is ~ecommended that Metropolitan Water District also be charged ~350 per million gallons. · RAW:hjm Agenda Item #18 H-1 All Districts .,,,, ... ~"~ ~The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California JAf1 2 6 1973 County Sanitation Districts of ·orange County Industrial and Permit Division 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Robert Webber Chief Industrial Waste Division Gentlemen: Re: Tonner Tunnel No. 2 w.o. 5-3849 Metropolitan has construction of its Tonner Tunnel No. 2 under contract. This tunnel is part of the Yorba Linda Feeder transmitting State project water to the Robert B. Diemer Filtration Plant located in the City of Yorba Linda. The tunnel will be constructed in the Chino Hills southeast of Diamond Bar in unincoroorated areas of Los Angeles Cuunty, Orange ~ouuty; and the City of Brea. Geologic exploration revealed that tunnel construction will pass through formations containing groundwater with elec- trical conductivities varying from 1600 to 4350 mi.cromhos. Water above 2000 micromhos is not acceptable to the Regional Water Quality Control Board for discharge into the natural watercourse. Therefore, a temporary permit is requested to discharge this ·water into your sewer system. Water so discharged will be free of oil and the turbid- ity will not exceed 50 J.T.U. Dissolved.sulfides are not expected in the groundwater, but will be controlled if present. · Arrangements have been made with the Yorba Linda County Water District to discharge this groundwater into their sewer system at Pacific Avenue. Since Yorba Linda discharges its · effluent into the Orange County sewer system, it was agreed that Metropolitan.would obtain the necessary permit and pay fees if applicable for public.agencies to the Sanitation Districts of Orange County. 1"111 Sum.ct Boulc\•ard, Los Angt•lcs, Calif. I Mailing Jddrcss: Box 54153, Los Angeles, Calif. 90054 /Telephone: (213} 626·4262 Agenda Item #18 H-2· All Districts The Melropolitan Water District of Soullwrn California County Sanitation Districts of Orange County -2- It is anticipated that the rate of flow of groundwater from the tunnel will increase as excavation progresses. This flow could average 100 gpm with higher maximum rates occurring during short periods of time. The groundwater with less than 2000 ~1icromhos of elec- trical conductivity will be automatically discharged into the natural watercourse. The groundwa:ter with greater than.2000 micromhos of electrical conductivity will be automatica'lly discharged into a 5-acre foot retention basin to permit con- trolled pumping into the sewer system. The agreement with Yorba Linda County Water District would permit the pumping of the 2000 plus micromhos water from the retention basin into the sewer system at continuous rates not exceeding 100 gpm. Any discharge in excess of 100 gpm would be coordinated between Yorba Linda County Water D:Lstrict and Metropolitan as to the time and rate of discharge. The present construction schedule indicates that c.lit;·chargc cf grv~ndwat..::r ·m&y :s La.ct. in May 19? 3 and continue until February 1975. Metropolitan ·would appreciate issuance of the tempo- rary permit to discharge groundwater from Tonner Tunnel No. 2 into your sewer system through the Yorba Linda sewer line at your earliest convenience. " If additional infonnation is needed, please call W. R. Stotz) telephone (213) 626-4282, extension 598. WRS/hp Agenda Item #18 Very truly yours, ., / .1'? .A-/ ,'-'1 .. '1.A."-t ··--) --1..~; .• \ ....... l/< ·. 'J-l.~ --c'.:~-<·· 'Y( Munson W. Dowd . Chief Engineer .· H-3 All Districts '..._/ . City of Huntington Beach ...... P.O. BOX 190 CALIF ORN IA 92648 QFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR February 8, 1973 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92707 Attention: J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary of the Boards of Directors Gentlemen: . The City of Huntington Beach has recently been contacted by representatives of the Sanitation Districts to consider the a .:i ..... .;,.""'k.;i .;+ .. .,. ,....r: ..... t! ..... ,..i.,..<'.".;¥1,... +i. ..... c~ 11 ,."""CS of proper+, .. ·1·mm"'1.; ~+,.., .. .,. ""\I .&.JU.V-'-... .L '-) V.&.. .l:" ~ ...... u.c...;;>..a..&A.C, ...... .!.~ ..., ""-'--~ '-} ~•4 ..._,..,...J..Q.-...,..&.J adjacent to Plant No. 2.· This was offered as a means of avoiding possible claims of nuisance against the District in the event the property is developed. It is currently zoned RA-Residential-Agricultural arid carries an undesignated clas- sification on the Master Plan of Land Use. This designation has been assigned the property because of its unique· location and size. The property owner has requested a zone change to Commercial. His applicati\:n has been denied by the Planning Commission and is presently pending before the City Council. The ·City Council has discussed this matter and if the property is a~quired by the Sanitation Districts the City is amenable to entering into a joint powers agreement for maintenance of such property. · · · If I can be of further assistance to you on this matter., please .feel free. to contact me at any time. ... :~· " . ' ... ··. , .. ·. ·•. "··DDR/gbs Very t~uly yours, ~,&.·~~ David D. Rowlands City Administrator Telepbone (714) 536-5201 Agenda Item #21 -I-All Districts Claim of SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY, vs. ) } l ] ) ) CLAIM FOR DAMAGES ORANGE COUNTY SANTITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE ) } ) COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. TO: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA · 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 1. The Claimant's name is SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING . ' COMPANY,_ ·whose address is 3000 East South Street, Long Beach, California 90805. 2. Claimant desires that notices be sen.t to Claimant in care of Rutan & Tucker, attention Richard A. Curnutt, 401 Chd.~ Center Drive West, Santa An~, C~lifcrnia 3. The date, place and other circumstances, _the occurrence of which gives rise to this claim#are as follows: Claimant entered into a written contract relating to the construction of th~ Sunflower Intefceptor, Reach. i·, Contract No. 7-6-1 from T~eatment Plant No. 1 to Bear Street. As part of that contract, Cl.aimant was required to do extra work as follows: (a} As a result of a broken water line and the resultant. flo'oding, Claima.nt was required to use ~abor, ' equipment, and materials to rectify, cure and alleviate this problem. {b) Claimant was required to "jump" the track of the Southern.Pacific Railroad ~d to later connect the two segments of pipe which resulted from the '!jump- ing" of the railroad track, all to Claimant's extra expense. Agenda Item #25 J-1· Districts l & 1 ... The dates when these damages and extra expenses were incurred were July through September 1971. On January 31, 1972, an'invoice was sent bx Claimant to the orange County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, relating to these extra expenses, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. No part of this invoice has been paid and the Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 refuses to pay it and it remains this date due and payable, together with interest thereon . . ' at the rate of seven percent per annum from January 31, 1972. 4. A general description of the damages incurred as now known are as follows: (a) ~25,573.41, as set out in the invoice dated January 31, 1972; {b) . Interest thereon at the rate of seven per- cent ·per annum from Jariuary 31, .1972; (c) At~orneys' fees incurredin the prosecution of this clai,m; • {d) General d~~ages, the nature and extent of which are not now known. 5. The name of the public employee c~using the damage insofar as known to ciaimant at the present ~ime is Bruce Witcher. ' 6. The amount claimed as of the time of the presenta- tic~ of this claim is: Agenda Item #25 (a) Invoice price of $25,573.41; (b} Interest, $1,790.90; (c) Attorneys' fees, $500.00; (d) Total amount claimed, $27,863.41. J-2 Districts 1 & 7 KEITH AND ASSOCIATES CONSUL TING CIVIL ENGINEERS Mr. Ray E. Lewis Deputy Chief Engineer County Sanitation District No. 11 P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Re: Slater Avenue Pump Station Dear Mr. Lewis: 1B2B SOUTH Q RANC> AVENUE SANTA. ANA, CALIFORNIA 92709 C7t4J !S4t•!530e February 2, 1973 Please refer to your letter of January 26, 1973. As discussed with you and your maintenance staff, many new materials and methods are available today for r~pair of the subject pump station. In order to investigate a reasonable·and economic solution for those repairs, it is our reconunendation that we work closely with the mainten~n~e staff :nc prepare a joint report on the reccl!'.mcndcd method of repairs. Upon approval by you, we would then prepare the final plans and specifications for the repair of 'the subject pump station. Since we cannot make an accurate estimate ·of time for this report, we would request that the pro:ect be completed at an hourly rate schedule at our normal· rates, with a maximum not to exceed $3000. If this meets with your appro\al a letter of confirmation will con- stitute .a contract, and we will proceed with the preliminary in- .vestiga~ion immediately. MKK:m HYCRAUL.ICS Agenda Item #34 Very truly .. yours, · Keith and Associates ~~}:::!.~ '· Milo K. Keith .. .. MUNICI.-'\L. SEFNICES K-1 District 11 --. -.------y--,;~:~1!·----~--------------·----·--· .. /1 • I"'!> ? KEITH AND ASSOCIATES CONSUL TING CIVIL ENGINEERS I S 2 S SOUTH G RAN 0 AVE NU£ SANTA ANA. CAL.IFORNIA 9270S 1714, 541·5306 AUGUST 1, 1972 SCHEDULE OF CURRENT HOURLY CHARGE RATES FOR SERVICES PERFORMED BY OUR COMPANY OFFICE PERSONNEL Principal Consultation ----------------------- Registered Civil Engineer -------------------- Design Engr., Survey Supervisor, $35.00 .Legal Documents -------------------~--~---- Junior Engr., Draftsman-----------------~---- Secretary Services --------------------------- FIELD PERSONNEL 28.00 24.00 18.00 9.00 per hr. per hr. per hr. per hr. per hr. Resident Civil Engineer ---------------------- 3-Man Survey Party -------------~---~--------- 2-Man Survey Party --------------------------- 1-Man Daily Inspection ----------------------- $24~00 per hr. 52.00 per hr. 22.00 per hr. 13.00 per hr. MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES .Stakes, Monuments, Prints, Misc. Material Cost plus 2 09o SUB-CONTRACTS Special engineering when r~quired of • electrical, mechanical, structural or architectural services will be bil~ed at cost plus 8%. Rates shown.abo~e are subject to revision for FIELD PERSONNEL on August 1, 1973 under terms and conditions of Operating Engineers Surveyors Contrac~. We look· forward to s~rving your engineering and survey needs and we thank you for your consideration oF o~r firm. KEITH AND-ASSOCIATES -•. :·:-; Aj0 ~ ~_/-__/,__ Milo K. Keith, President HVORAUL.ICS MUNICIPAL. SEr.!VICES Agenda Item #34 K-2 District 11 -------.---- GENERAL CONTRACTORS A.G. TUTOR CO., INC. AND f'!. M. SALIBA CO . . 13257 SATICOY STREET NORTH HOLLYWOOD. CALIFORNIA 91605 TELEPHONE: (213) 764-2500 February g, 1973 Board of Directors ·county Sanitation District of Orange County P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Bruce Witcher Ref: Pacific Coast Highway Fo~ce·Main Dear Bruce: We are hereby requesting the replacement of Louis E. Hall with Pioneer Jacking at the Hall Company's request as they stated they are now . unable to perform their work within our schedule. As we discussed,·! will set up the time limits per bore and the tolerarces with no monias to be paid until you have appr·oved said bores for payment. Yours very truly, A. G. Tutor Co. & N. M •. · Saliba Co. ~~~9! -:Zd-:J//11-,/1 ~" !ft .. Ronald N. Tutotr "" RNT:ec Managing Partner Agenda Item #39 -L-District 5 LOUIE HALL BORING CO., INc. PHONE 336-8772 '"'-' 1226 SO. VALINDA WEST COVINA, CALIF. .' Dece.28,1972 Orange County 10844 Ellis Ave. Fountain Valley, Calif. Atten; Mr. Bruce Witcher Dear Sir, Due &o an overload of work we are unable to do the bores for A.G. Tutor Co. Inc. and N.M. Saliba on the Pacific Coast Highway Force Main. We contacted ~ oontr~ctcr to meet ~itb ~.G. having our name removed as the sub-contractor at this time. Thank You. • Louie Hall Boring Co. Inc. ; •I • , ;.> ----· Agenda Item #39 . -M-District 5 \,,VlJ,, l I ~ .. '-' l ! .;\ l J 1_;,, ~J J :> 1 !~ i I..!.:> u;· l);'..:\..,lJl~ \..VU.1 l l P. O. Box 3127 -1Qd.l4 Ellis ~\venue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Cl IA~~GE O!UJER c. o. :;o. 2 ~~~~--~~~~~-:a :~TRACTOR: A, G. Tutor Co. & N. M. Saltba Co., DATE Februarv Jl~. 1~73 A Joint Venture rOB: Sewer Contract "B"-Unit 8, Pacific Coast Hir:hway Force Main,Contract 5-19 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (:D~UXT'AX) $ ___ 8_,_4""---94_...._5...._5 In accordance with contract-provisions, the following changes in the :or,.J:-act and/or contract l..-ork are herein· authG>rizc<l and as cor.lpcnsation :hcrcfor, the following additions to or' dc<luctions from the contract price are iercby approvc<l. .. .. REFERENCE: Contractor's .invoice dated January 12, 1973. Inspection reports A. The Districts' 30'1 VCP sewer at Station 36+79 was found to be located incorrectly on the plans and therefore w.:is broken by the contractor. Thfs caused the contractor, to lose approximately 5 hrs. time. Total qost of crew and equipment standby ·time is $1,013.25. · ADD 1,013.25 B. The contractor was directed to repair the 30" VCP broken at Station 36+79. This repair was accom-· plished in the earlYt morning hours of 12-16-72 for. ·a· tct~r cost of $98~.30. ~ ADD C. The District was direc_ted to place a. slur1.,y back- fill at Supericr Blvd. crossing under the storm drains at Stations 84+50, 90+00 and 93+75 for a total of 60 cubic yards at $13/cu.yd. for $780.00. ADD D. Due to the close proximity of the existing 27" FM at Station 21+00 with .this project, the contractor was directed to· backfill between these two force mains-with slurry ••. 4 cubic yards at $13/cu.yd. for $52.00. ADD E. Due to.the location of the existing 30" VCP sewer at Static~ 36+79, the contractor was directed to make field changes in. the 24'' FM which involved cutting and rewelding of pipe. Total cost for this work, $495.00. Agenda Item #40 N-1 ADD {Continued) District 5 984.30 780.00 52.00 495.00 .. cou;ffY S:;:; IT,\T Io~~ DI S7!~1 CTS or-OR:\~:GE cou:~TY P. 0 • · Box S 1 2 7 ..: l 0 8 .1 4 E 11 i s Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CIIA~~GE ORDER C.O. KO. 2 (Cont'ri.) ·o'.1'RACTOR DJ.\TE Febru~r...,. 14. 1?7? . ·' 1: A. G. Tutor Co. & N. M. Saliba Co., . .,,. ~ .! 2 _2 A Joint Venture !OB: Sewer Contract ''B"-Unit 8, Pacific Coast 11i~hway Force Main; Contract 5-19 F. The contractor was directed to concrete encase the 24" FM at Station 62+90-1-due to the bottom 9f the drainage ditch crossing the force main . being in very close proximity to the force ma~n. Sev€n (7) cu. yds. of Class A concrete at $25 per cu. yd. in place for $175.00. G. The .contractor was directed to remove and replace all the debris, mud, peat and organic matter between Stations 69+50 and 83+60 with imported sand backfill for protection of the force. main •.. 1500 cu. yds. at $3.33/cu.yd. for $4,995.00. ADD ADD TOTAL.ADD Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD) (1D"'t1>1~ Amended Contract Price Approved: 175.00 4,995.00 $ ___ 8_,_4..;;...9L_~ • __ 5_5 . . $ 678,500.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 8,494.55 s 716,994~55 Board authorization date: ~ruary 14, 1973 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of .Orange County, California By ~----~----------------~c~o-n_t_r_a_c~t-o_r __ By ------~----------~----~--~---Deputy.Chi et· Engine By ----------Engineer Agenda Item #40 N-2 District 5 .. TO: FROM: SUBJECT: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 lOS.C4 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71.C) 5.C0-29~0 MEMORANDUM February 7 , __ 1973 Fred A. Harper~ _General Manager Ray E. Lewis, Deputy Chief Engineer Pacific Coast Highway Forc.e. Main, Contract No. 5-19 (714) 962-2.Cl I Construction has proceeded to 400-feet northwest of the Arches and from 500-feet southeast of the Arches to across . from the Balboa Bay Club. Th~ connection at Bitter Point · Pump Station is scheduled for the evening of February 8th. A meeting is scheduled with the State Division of Highways to request modifications in consi:;ruction proceeding -co expedite crossing of Pacific Coast Highway at the Balboa. Bay Club. A request has also been made to the State to restore on-street parking as soon as possible. The north offramp at the Arches was. bored for about 12-feet and then open cut due to a sandstone out-cropping. Pacific Coast Highway was restriped from the Balboa Bay Club to the Arches prior to work in this area. Contractor is planning to commence work on the 24-inch· · VCP gravity sewer in the vicinity of old Newport Boulevard later this month. The road in the oil field was restored to a point where the Oil Company could shoot it with oil when the rains came and made a mess out of it. Contractor is currently waiting for it to dry out. REL:BEW:hjm Agenda Item #41 -0-District 5 • F~bruory 2, 1173 C.ali:forn1~ Divis.ion of Highw:1ys 120 Jouth ~9rlnb ~trc~t Los A:1gele;a, \.:!:!. i!'o rnla 92Jl2 Attention: Subject: Pac11"1c Coast Hlgi:,;ay Poree 1·ialn, L'roJect Ho. 5-19 Sncro:1cl1.:1nnt ?-:: r::ti t ;,\o. ·77'2-i~-77" . .603D Pui.;"".ai1&, tu ou.l· r,~cent t.el\!.:ll10r.n~ conve.rs3tion, this i£ t.o requcs t ti1e l'est..t'l.plof~ of J'.•Cif.!..c (!oiJst HJ.gh,foy 1'r~ja =1e .. ;~1ort .3ouJ.~v~n·cl 30i.l th~ l' .!.~' :;.\)..t." t·, 1e .. ,·..tr!.'O~.;e or t :·1e r~u toru t.L.J!l of the on-~ treiJ t ~wr~:lt1g on tl-10 .Goutherl.Y &lue of the I'~ci ~-,;_~ Coast Hlt;h :ay. T11e Dlstrlct ,..111 consid~r aclditloi1'1l l)bll- gat1om> of c~at to .. 'JCCOt!pllc;h t~11$ in add1tiotl to tlla req . ..l1re!:icnts :ls set :fort!'l in said r=ncroachment ~;01~1.tt. . . This rcqucnt 1s to aid the coma~ercl~l d~valonments in the are3 anti to restore th~ or1-ot-''tVi:t _,)lH"Klnf; to uccoul.:4o~t~te this dev.elop::\~nt. T:~c ~lutricli' s c~:mt.rt..\·~tor i~ :;roceeulrq r1lth the C;:an..;.truc ti on eihe~d of acl'leuulo 9nd ·:rill restore t.:~e perr.ionen t reLJur:fc:icliio ,,1 thl:i t:-te n~~xt f'o:-1 d :iya. Your pro::1pt response to this request ·,zill be greatly appreciated.· REL:hju ~c: Mr. Joee9h Devlin City of Newport Beach Agenda Item #42 Engineer -P-· District 5 '.~ > January 12, 1973 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Atten: Mr. Fred Harper, General Manager Re: Jamboree Boulevard Subtrunk Sewer Gentlemen: Industrial ~ Complex · I • The Irvine Industrial Complex respectfully requests permission to construct a portion of the Master Planned Sewer System located in Jamboree Boulevard from Barranca Road to approximately 1400 feet southerly. Since the line will be located within street right of way which will be fully improved and dedicated to the City of Irvine, an easement will not be required. The District's engineers will design, stake, inspect and prepare the necessary bid documents for the above project, and the Complex will award the contract, after the District's approval, to the lowest bidder. After construction is completed and the final costs have been tabu- lated, the Complex will request the District prep?re the usual reim- bursement agreement with the Complex for said improvements.· A map showing the construction limits ls enclosed •. · MJB:pw cc: Williamson & Schmid ... .-: .'enclosure ( 1) ., • ·.: •• ... ;: T • .' • . . . ' 2122 Campus Drive /Box 4404 •Irvine. California 92664 •(714) 833·1010 Agenda Item #46 -Q-District 7 ENGINEERS o ARCHITECTS 4 t 2 SOUTH LYON STREET SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHONE C714> 547-4471 February 7, 1973 Mr. Fred A. Harper / General Manager County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County P. 0 . Box 8127 fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention Mr. Ray E. Lewis, Deputy Chief Engineer . Jamboree Road Subtrunk No. 2, Reach 54 Contract No. 7-20-7 REPLY TO POST 9FFICE BOX 178 In response to your request, we submit the following proposal for engineerin~ services. to prepare plans and specifications and to provide construction staking for sub iect master plan foci lity. The proiect will begin approximately 1,080 feet north of Alton Avenue in Jamboree Boulevard and extend approximately 1,545 feet in Jamboree Boulevard to Barranca Road. Estimated construction cost is $42, 000. Design oi: the sub- trunk will conform to the district's standards. The Irvine Industrial (:>mp lex .will be the contracting agency and wi II let the contract to the lowr-:s! responsi- ble bidder through public bidding procedures. Specification format will conform to Irvine Industrial Complex standards. Our fee for preparing plans and specifications wi II be a lump sum amount of $2,200. Fief~ surveys will be required in order to prepare the plans and speci- fications. These surveys include taking topography and culture within the proiect limits. We· propose that all field ·surveys for design, construction staking, and as-built conditions,· be performed on a per·diem basis at $54 per hour for a three-man survey crew, $41 per hour for a twol-man survey crew, and $21 'per hour for a licensed surveyor. We are ready to proceed with the work upon receiving authorization • . BOYLE ENGINEERING · .. -.: ·-~ui)~~Jf), -· Conrad Hohener, Jr. C. E. 10951 'p R 0 F E S S I 0 N A L ENGINEERING A 1-.J I) A~CH ITECTU RAL SEf.cVICES Agenda Item #46(b)0 -R-District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 73-13-7 APPROVING MASTER PLAN REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A SEWERAGE FACILITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (MASTER PLAN) WITH IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That construction of the Main Street Subtrunk East, Reaches 41 and 42, Contract No. 7-2C-l; Jamboree Subtrunk No. 1, Reach 47, Contract No. 7-2C-2; Von Karman Avenue Subtrunk, Contract No. 7-2C-3; McGaw Avenue Subtrunk, Portion of Reach 49, Contract No. 7-2D-4; Jamboree Road Subtrunk No. 2, Reach 52, Contract No. 7-2D-5; and Jamboree Road Subtrunk No. 2, Reach 53, Contract No. 7-2D-6 has been completed. Section 2. 1rhat by letter, Boyle Engineering, District~~ engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with District requirements; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said engineers' recommendation, which said recommenda- tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the certain Sewerage Facility Reimbu~sement Agreement (Master Plan), between County Sanitation District No. 7 and IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, providing for reimbursement by the District for said facilities is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 5. That reimbursement in the total amount of $329,708.80 as detailed on the attached Exhibit A is hereby authorized to be made from the Facilities Revolving Fund of th~_District in accordance with the terms and conditions outlined in said agreement. Section 6. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Distrtct, in form acceptable to th~ General Counsel; and, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 14, 1973. Agenda Item #47 S-1 District 7 MEMORANDUM ___ .,.......,.. ________ _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUtnY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 1084-4 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 Date: February 7, 1973 TO:· Fred A. Harper, General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Deputy Chief Engineer SUBJECT: County Sanitation District No. 7 Reimbursement Agreement Irvine Industrial Complex, .eontracts 7-2C-l, 7-2C-2, 7-2D-4, 7-2D-5, 7-2D-6 and 7-2C-3 I have reviewed the final cost.submitted by the Irvine Industrial Complex regardlng the reimbursement of the aforementioned subtrunks . in Main Street, McGaw Avenue, Von Karman Avenue and Jamboree Boulevard. It is recommended that the reimbursement to the Complex be in the grand total amount.of $329,708.80 itemized as follows: ' Item I -Contract 7-2C-l Main Street Subtrunk Fast -Reaches 41 and 42 Cont~act .· Item 1. 21 11 VCP sewer main 2. 18" VCP It II ·3. 48 11 Manhole .. J.t.. Encasement concrete, delete. Total Construction Cost Total Engineering Cost GR.{\:ND TOTAL ITEM I Quantity 1600 lf 2718 lf 118 vf Unit Price $35 .·00 31.50 40.00 .$ 56,000.00 85,617.00 4,720.00 $146~337.00 -0-* $146,337.co Item I1 -Contract 7-2C-2 Jamboree Subtrunk No. 1 -Reach 47 Contract 7-2D-b Jamboree Suotrunl< No. 2 .Keacn 5J 1. 18" VCP sewer main 818 lf 28. 75 .. $ 23_,517 .50 2. 15" VCP '!. " 1428 lf 22.75 32,487.00 3. 48" Manhole 71 vf 65.00 4,615.00 4. 8 11 double barrel siphon It ls 7,600.00 T6tal Construction Cost $68,219.50 Total Engineering Cost -o--r.· GRAND TOTAL ITEM I .$68, 219. 50 Agenda Item #47 S-2 .District 7 ...._; February 7, 1973 To: Fred A. Harper, General Manager, From: Ray E. Lewis, Deputy Chief Engineer Subject: County Sanitation District No. 7 Reimbursement Agreement Irvine Industrial Complex, Contracts 7-2C-l, 7-2C-2, 7-2D-4, 7-2D-5, 7-2D-6 and 7-2C-3 Continued Item III -Contract 7-2D-4 McGaw Subtrunk-Portion of Reach 49 Contract 7-2D-5 Jamboree Subtrunk No. 2 -Reach 52 1. 21 11 VCP sewer main 2. 18" VCP " " 3. 48" Manhole Total Construction Cost Total Engineering Cost GRAND TOTAL ITEM III 1246 lf 1968 lf 113 vf 26.50 23.80 48.20 33,019.00 46,838.40 5,446.60 $85,304.00 -0- $85,304.00 ·Item IV -Contract 7-2C-3 Von Karman Avenue -Main Street to 1300 feet Northerly ·1. 10" VCP sewer ·main 2. 48" Manhole 3. Engineering Design 4. Construction Staking GRAND TOTAL·ITEM IV 1338 lf 20.00 3 ea 600.00 26,760.00 1,800.00 856.80 431.50 $29,8'-+8.jO GRAND TOTAL REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT •• ~ •• $329,708.80 * Engineering Cost not a part of Reimbursement 1-lgreement. Engineering Cost paid directly to Boyle Engineering. This letter and the itemized construction costs contained· herein should be made a part of the Reimbursement Agreement and marked as Exhibit "A" attached hereto. , , I I Agenda Item #47 S-3 District 7 • A .. RUTAN & TUCKER ATTORNEYS AT LAW A.W. RU'TAN (1880•1972) ,JAMES B. T:,,CICER, SA. (1888•1950) THE BANK or CALIFORNIA BUILDING 401 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST POST OF'FICE BOX 1976 OF COUNSIU, W. It. LINOSAT CVERETT A. HA1n \,__JJ'ORD W. DAHL .....SAMAN H. SM£0EGAAAO M. RODGER HOWELL JAMES e. TUCKE A GARVIN F. SHALLENBERGER JAMES A. MOORE llEADEAT W. WALKER ROBERT L. RISL.£Y HICK E.YOCCA FRITZ A. STRADLING PAUL F'RE0£RIC MARX HOMER L, McCORMICK, JR. COMUND A.CASEY .COWARD F'. HARRISON JAMCS E. ERICKSON VIit.LiAM A. BIEL RICHARD A. CURNUTT LEONARD A. HAMPEL. JOHN 8. HURLBUT, .JR. MICHAEL W. IMMEL.L WIL.UAM C. DEANS MILF'OAD W. DAl'IL,JA. TMEOOOllE I. WAI.LACE • ./fl • COLl.EEN M.CLAIA£ AOHALO P.AAAINGTON STUART T. WALDRIP C. RICHARD LCMOH RICHARD P. SIMS C. CRAIG CARLSON .JOHN .J. MURPHY WILLIAM A. RAUTH m M, STCPHEN COONTZ ROBERT C. BRAUN EDWARD 0. 5T8CSMA,JR. ALEC Jt''ACT GLASSCR DAVID P. BERGLAND THOMAS S. SALINGER ROBERT S. LEWIN PAUL C. LDIZEAUX, JR. KENNETH S. TUN£ STEPHEN G. POE SANTA ANA,CALIF'ORNIA 92702 '714) 835·2200 February 6, 1973 . ~ Orange County Sanitation District. Post Office Box 8127 LOS ANGELES O,.f'ICE SUITE 2930 SIS SOUTH F'L.OWEA STREET LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90071 TELEPHONE (2131 489•323i! LAGUNA HILLS Of'F'ICE 23521 PASCO 0£ VALENCIA. SUITE 300 LAGUNA HILLS. CALIFORNIA 92653 TELEPHONE (714) 835·2200 I~ REPLY PLEASE REF'ER TO .Fountain Valley, California 92708 .. -- Attention: Mr. Ray Lewis Assistant Engineer Re: Release of a portion of easement of Orange County Sanitation District at 12081 Woodbine Drive, Santa :Ana, California Gentlemen: Pursuant to my recent correspondence and conversations with Mr. Ray Lewis of the Orange County Sanitation District I am hereby requesting on behalf of Mr. Sterling Graydon, Jr., of 12081 Woodbine Drive, Santa Ana, California, that . the Orange County Sanitation Distric.t quitclaim to Mr. Graydon a portion of the sewer easement of his prop- erty at the above addres~. Until Mr. Graydon recently opened an escrow to sell this property he was unaware that a portion of his house_~nd patio slightly encroached upon your easement. This encroachment caused the sale to be lost and renders the title unmarketable. The portion which is requested to be quitclaimed to Mr. Graydo~ is depicted in yellow on the enclosed topographic survey of the property, a copy of which was previously supplied to Ml?.· Lewis on January 15, 1973, and which area is described in the enclosed legal de·scription. , . It was my understanding that• this portion of your easement would be denominated excess land and, because of th~ nature of its acquisition, would be gratuitqusly quit- claimed to Mr. Graydon • . · Agenda Item #48 T-1 District 7 ~· RUTAN & TL:CKER ATTORNEYS AT L.AW -. . . Orange County Sanitation District February 6, 1973 . P~ge Two Please advise me if you wish our off ice to prepare the quitclaim deed. Please send all notices to this office and advise me when this matter will appear on your ~genda. -... Thank you for·your help and cooperation in this ·matter. I look forward to heari~g from you. Yours very truly, RVo:J7~~ Encs. Paul c. Loizeaux, Jr. cc: Mr. Sterling Graydon ·. ·. ·. ·. .. . ., . . ' . . . . . . . ··:. : ... . .. . ' •' . . ., . . .. , Agenda Item #48 T-2 District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 73-14-7 .. AUTHORIZING EXECUTii)N ·oF QUITCL.AIM DEED A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF QUITCLAIM DEED * * I * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Quitclaim Deed for portions of existing District easement relative to sanitary sewers constructed under Assessment District No. 5 proceedings; dated from County Sanitation District No. 7 to Sterling Graydon, Jr., be approved; and, Section 2. That the real property to be quitclaimed is more particU;larly described on Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That the Chairman of the District be authorized and directed to execute said Quitclaim Deed, quitclaiming the District's interest in the certain real property hereinabove described. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regul~r meeting held February 14, 19·73. Agenda Item.#48 -U-District 7 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: -MEMORANDUM February 7, 1973 Fred A. Harper, General Manager COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALl:.EY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 Ray E. Lewis, Deputy Chief Engineer West Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-5-lR Contractor completed installation of the 15-inch VCP Sewer in Tustin Avenue and Fruit Street. It was decided that the Contractor would pave over the ~rench on Fruit ~treet with ·temporary pavement hoping that the ground wi.11 dry . out so that he can get compaction. All pipe has been installed on Edinger, however, here too the Contractor is having difficulty getting his compaction. The Contractor has been notified. that he will start no other worJ.· anywhere on the• project until all the compaction has passed on Edinger and the first course of permanent pav0 m.ent is placed. Weather has been only part of the problem with compaction. Con- tractor is not too responsive to public inconvenience being created by construction. Barring any more weather delays, Edinger should be complete in approximately ten da:~s. · REL:BEW:hjm Agenda Item #49 -V-District 7 •. ORDINANCE NO. 203 AN ORDINANCE _!\.MENDING UNIFORM cormECTION AND USE ORDINANCE NO. 202 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California: does ordR.tn· A.~ follows: ARTICLE 1 Ar~icle 2 of Ordinance No. 202 is hereby amended by adding thereto the following sections: (o) District Connection Charge. Is a connection charge imposed by District No. 2 as a charge for the use of District's sewerage facilities whether such connection is made directly to a District sewerage facility or to a sewer which ultimately discharges into a District sewerage facility. (P) District Sewerage Facility. Shall mean any property bel~nging to CoWlty Sanitation District No. 2 used in tne treatment, transportation, or disposal of sewage or industrial wastes • . (q) Domestic Sewage. Shall mean the liquid and water .. borne . wastes derived from the ordinary living processes, free from indus- . trial wastes, and of su~h character as to permit satisfactory disposal without special treatt'.ent, into the public sewer or by means of a private disposal system. (r) Sewera~e Facilities. Are any facilities used in the collection, transportation, treatment or disposal of sewage and industrial wastes. . (s) Family Dwell:tn~ Buildin~ •. Is.a building designed aJ1d used . . ' to house families and containing one or more ~w~lling units • .. (t) Dwelling Unit. Is one or more habitable rooms which are · occupied or which are intende?-or designed to be occupied by one family with facilities for living, sleeping, cooking and eating. (u) Building se·wer. Is the sewer draining a building and ex- . tending beyond the exterior walls thereof and which connects to a \ District sewerage facility or to a private or public sew~rage facility which ultimately discharges to a District sewerage facility. Agenda Item #53 W-1 District 2 {v) Other Terms. Any term not herein defined is defined as being the same as set forth in the International Conference of Building Officials. Uniform Building Code, 1970 Edition, Volume I. Article 2 . ~ (a) Section (a) of Article 6 of Ordinance No. 202-1s amended to read as follows: (a) District Connection Charges. Before any connection permit shall be issued the applicant shall pay to the District or its agent the charges specified herein. (1) Connection Charge for New Construction, Family Dwelling Buildings. For each new single family d~elling building constructed, the connection charge shall be $50 per dwelling unit. For each multiple . family dwelling building constructed, the connection charge shall be $125 per dwelling unit. (2)_ Connection Charge for New Construction, Other Than \ Famill Dwelling Buildin~. For all other uew construction, including but not limited to commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the connection charge for each . . building s~wer ~:hall be as follows: Diameter of Buildin5 Sewer Charge 6 inches or less $ 50 8 inche·s $1~0 .10 inches $200 ' 12 inches ·$300 .. (3) Connection Charge for Replacement Buildings. Agenda Item #53 For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be.calculated on the same basis as provided in Paragraphs (1) and (2) hereinabove. If such replacement construction· is commenced within two years after demolition or -2- W-2 District 2 destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shal~ be allowed, calculated on the basis of the current connection charge applicable for the new construction of the building demolished or destroyed. In no case shall such credit exceed the .connection charge. (4) Connection Charges for Additions to or Alterations of Existing Buildings. In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is Agenda Item #53 made to increase the occupancy of family dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than family dwelling buildings, the connection charge shall be $125 for each dwelling unit added or created and in the case of new construction other than family dwelling buildings which requires the ·~\, construction of a new building sewer, the connection cnarge for each new building sewer sna.Ll be as :t"ollows: Diameter of Building Sewer 6 inches or less 8 inches 10 inches 12 inches Charge $ 50 $100 $200. $300 When Char~e is to be Paid. Payment of' connection charges shall be required at the time of issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District,·excepting in the case of a ' building legally exempt from .the requirement of obtaining a building permit. The payment of the sewer connection charge for such buildings· will be required at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within the territorial limits of the District. -3- W-3 District 2 f~·· Schedule of Charges. A schedule of charges specified herein will be on file in the office of the Secretary of the District and in the Building Department Qf each city within the District. Biennial Review of Charges. At the end of two y~ars from the effective date of this ordinance, and every two.years thereafter, the Board of Directors shall reyiew the charges established by.this article and if in its judgment such charges require modifi- cation, an amendment to this ordinance will be adopted establishing such moqification. ARTICLE 3 Section (b) of Article 6 of Ordinance No. 202 is amended by adding ther~to Section (3) to read as follows: (3) When an excess capacity connection charge is payable by a user, as hereinabove provided, a credit equal to the connection charge paid by the user, if .any, shall be allowed against such excess capacity connection charge. ARTICLE 4 Except as herein amended, Ordinance No. 202 is ratified, re- affirmed·and is to become effective , as amended by --------- this.ordinance. The Chairman of the Board of Directors shali sign this Ordinance . . and the Secretary of the Districts sha~ attest thereto and certify I , to the passage of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be published once in the --------------------------' a daily newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and circulated in the \,,,I District, within fifteen (15) days after the date of passage of this Ordinance by said Boa.rd of Directors and said Ordinance shall take effect • ----------------------- Agenda Item #53" -4-W-4 District 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directorn of County Sani- tation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, at a regu~ar . meeting held on the day Of , 1972. ---------- ATTEST: Secretary, Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California \ J Chairman, Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California • ... Agenda Item #53 -5-W-5 . District 2 COU:ffY SA:HTATTO:~ DISTIUCTS OF ORA~~GE cou:;ry P. O. Box 8127 -108~4 Ellis Avenue Fountain v·a 11 c y, Ca 1 if orn i a 9 2 7 O 8 CHANGE ORDER C.O. h'.O. 3 CO~~TRACTOR: SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING cm.~PANY DATE Feo~r~ua .... r~:; ...... ~-..1...-+•4-,-...1-9-7...,.3--- Santa Ana.River Interceptor Sewer, From Reclamation Plant No. 1 to .JOB: Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1 Amount of this Change Order (ADD)~ $ 3,118.50 ------------ '..I In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are ·hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Addendum No. 3:, Schedule of Prices and Section 115 of Specifications. The Contractor was directed to place two (2) additional feet of rock bedding due to poor grou~d conditions from Stations 29o+69 to 291+69 and from 30o+25 to 303+64. 189 cu. 189 cu. yd. @$7.50/cu.yd. for $1,417.50 yd. @$9.00/cu.yd. for $1,701.00 --·~. Hoard authorization date: Mruary 14, 1973 By----------------------~~----=--C on tractor By ___ _ Engineer Agenda Item #54 ADD. $3, 118.50 · TOI'AL ADD $ 3, 118. 50 ========z==== . . Original Contract Price $ 6, 274 ,·608.40 Prev. Au th •. Changes 1, Add $ 1,401, 504 .14 ---------------- This Chan'ge (ADD) (OOOUC<r) $ 3, 118. 50 ---------------- Amended Contrac~ Price $ 7, 679, 231. o4 -X- Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange.County, California By ______________________ ,__ ________ _ Deputy Chief Enginee~ District 2 MEMORANDUM: February 9, 1973 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Deputy Chief Engineer COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 SUBJECT: Request for Authorization to Issue Change Order Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No. 2-14-1 On February 6th, District's personnel observed the under- mining of the Olive Subtrunk crossing of the Santa Ana River southerly of Katella Avenue. Attached with this memo is a sketch showing the conditions as observed. A similar cuudl i...lu11 uecu.rred '-m the Orange Subtrunk and remedial , repairs were made in the Fall of 1970 to avoid damage to ·the pipe by debris and waters in the Santa Ana River. The cost :for this remedial Nork on the Orange Subtrunk in 1970 was approximately $9,500. To eliminate the potential of' damage to the Oliv.e Subtrunk, I am hereby requesting the authority to issue a change ord~r to the Sully-Miller Contracting Company who can perform this emergency repair. A change order, if authorized, would be written on a time and material basis not to exce-ed a maximwn of" $11,000. Attached is a sketch showing the contemplated · emergency remedial work as required. · REL:hjm ,. Agenda Item #55 Y-1 District 2 rn ;>< -U\ -I -z (j\ () 0 z 0 --t COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA DtSi~\CT N~ "Z . . i~·-------------------------------~--=--O-L~l-V_~_,._5_U=B===T=W=N~1 ~ __ ___J Agenda Item #55 Y-2 District 2 \Tl ... \)_ ·- Agenda Item #55 Y-3 . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS I OF ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA District 2 MEMORANDUM February 7,.1973 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Deputy Chief Engineer COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108-44 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 SqBJECT: Santa Ana River Interceptor, Project No. 2-14-1 Work on this project has progressed from just north of Seventeenth Street to 4,ooo feet north along the Flood Control District's levee in the golf course. Due to inclement weather the Contractor is unable to maintain his schedule through the golf course. Has been shut down .for· six days because of rain. • A new schedule has been submitted. The 84-inch RCP will start north of Harbor and proceed northerly about March 1st. When the 84-inch is completed to Fairview, work will conunence at Plant No. 1 proceeding north to Harbor. This phase is . scheduled for August to December 1973 with the project being essentially completed by January 1, 1974. There are still prqblems with pipe deliveries due to delays in production. The pilot tunnel under Seventeenth Street is complete and the invert haB been poured. Lsndscaping oper- ations are progressing sat.i.sfac~orily. REL:BEW:hjm Agenda Item #56 Z-1 District 2 ~ I I\) 100 0+ 0 '5-M PlP(;' SCHe-OULf.'- SAN1A ANA ~l~ lN1e'RCef'l:>~ St.:lWC'-~ CONT@cl NQ ~-14-1 OA"Te': r=ee~u~~ ;1 1~1~ . OZAN6e"WOO A'J~. C\1APM~N A 'If- t;Uu;ay S.-\:CITATIO:~ DISTRICTS OF OPJ\~;GE cou:;ry P. O. Box 8127 -108~4 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORD~R NO. 1 ~o:-:rrRACTOR: J F sn· e· a Co r·nc ~ ---~·---~·--------~~~·~'--=~~·~~------------- c,o. DATE February 14, · 1973 rOB: Knott Interceptor~ A Portion of Reach 1, and Reaches 2 & 3, Contract No. 3-17 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (~ $ __ 3_,.......,1 ___ 68 ............... 0 ___ 0_ · In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the :onWact and/or contract work are hereby authorized.and as compensation :herefor, the following additions to or dc<luctio~s from the contract price are iereby ~pprovcd. . ... Reference: Contract Proposal, Schedule to Prices r-- The Contractor was directed to place two additional feet of rock bedding due to poor ground conditions from station 63+69 to· 65+85. · 192 C.Y. @ $7.50 for $1,440.00 192 _C.Y.@ $9.00 for ·$1,728.00 ADD -$3,168.00 ; TOTAL ADD Original Contract Price Prev ~-Au th. Changes $ --~3 __ , 1_6_8_. o_o_ .. $ 5,755,480.00 $ ~o- This Change (ADD)(HXMM~?) $ 3,168.00 Board authorization date: . Fe·~ary 14, 1973 By _____ _ Contractor By _______ _ Engineer Agenda Item #62 Amended Contt·act Price $ 5,758,648.oo -AA- Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange.County, California By ______ ~--------~---.-·--~...---~~ Deputy· .. Chief ·Enginee: ·. District 3 ·• MEMORANDUM February 7, 1973 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Deputy. Chie·f Engineer COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71.C) 540-2910 (71.C) 962-24 II SUBJECT: Knott Interceptor Sewer, Contract· No. 3-17 Work has progressed on Magnolia nearly to Slater. The intersection of Talber~ and Magnolia has been paved and is open in all four directions: Traffic on Magnolia is limited to two lanes, one in each direction, from just south of Talbe.rt to Slater. . The vent. line at Bushard and Ellis is complete and final paving of Ellis and Bushard should take place soon. ~ The Contractor is having difficulty getting his compaction on Magnolia due to the.amount of rain during the month of January and early February. Backfill may have to be removed and replaced to achieve required compaction. · There is still some complaining by the homeowners in Greenbrook. The Contractor has been making an effort to alleviate these by keeping his operation 100-feet·or more from the walls of the s~bdivision.· There has been little or no dust due to the weather a~~ the Contractor's watering during the drier periods. Work on the crossing of the Miller-Holder Trunk·is complete. The Knott Interceptor encroaches into the existing 72-inch ~iiller-Holder Sewer approximately two feet because of grade restrictions. Work. was done in two stages, preparation and the actual crossing itself. The preparation was started early in January with.the excavation and shoring of the pit .. A cradle was constructed under the existing 72-inch RCP sewer up to spring line •. The 72-inch was t~en cut down through the concrete to the PVC liner, which remained intact, and the con,cretie removed. After the concrete of the 72-inch pipe was shaped properly and expansion material placed, the PVC liner was cut, laid back and heat welded to the new 96-inch pipe. More PVC was heat welded to it and the section of 96-inch RCP was set in the opening on shims and the PVC liner welded to the PVC on the outside of this section of pipe. Then the 96-inch RCP was cradled in con- \_,/ crete. Work at the Oceanview Channel at Newland and Arnett is progressing. The manholes are set and part of the pit has been backfilled. The transitions are being formed. Excavation to be backfilled to two small pits, approximately 15'xl5' by February 15, 1973. Agenda Item #63 -BB-District 3 !J> (Jq Cl> ::s p, J» H ct Cl> s =II: 0\ w to to I I'\) t1 ..... rn ct' Ii ..... 0 ct' w 'Z~+oo ~'20±00 ZIO+CO 'Z~ I "Ota::) 140tCX> l"'ZO+oo J_IOit?O 5'0±00 ~ 10+oo 4o+co o+co J~' Jr I r· T T T T j{ ,~ I l .Jr f I T i { r .r· ~ i .... I I l. i ( ·-!-. -: . -.. I I I ' -i " IS"SEVI~ ON M~_FAOO:.N lNCUJOIN<::i 6.JACKt:-1~0 CACS\N6 -I.- .. llltllltlllllllllllllllllllllllHllllllllllllUlllllltllllllllllllltlltllllllllHllltllf sP~tAl.. cros5l1'tG oc~ 'I\~ CHAN~-(.. :1 llllllllllHlltllllltllllllllllll•IHMllltlllP, 'llltllHlft•lllUllltlNlllMCtl_....., ~ Mt;FAOC\,.~ ~ g, Newl.ANO /_ ~~et1\N6~& . r ~ N£WL~f\JO ) .CSO.ilJNNe-lA'.)~AL · ~f='l l. AV~ ;:k ------------------------------------·---.. . SOMPLe-ie:D AN, t 5 1 t~7~t;· '°' SCHC:OULf-tf ;a a a ~ f'AIZLlEST FOSS\6Ll:-Pr<.oDUCilON SCH~PU~~ NO ort-A'f''S OUt!' 10 Wl:'ATHC:~ O~ O"TH~~ ~IRCUM~1A~E'S • - - -.. PoCSSU~Le" <5CHe:OULC--INCLUOlNC::r O~LA'(S CA<>5~0 ey wi:AiHC:~ AND POOit ~lt.. CONDlTtONS KNOTT INTE'RCE-P\OR se-we~ ("...l)N1RACi ~-OATe: r-1!'"5~ At?:\' 7 1 1~73 " ·~ CouNn' SANITATION D1sTR1crs of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA .92708 (71-4) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 MEMORANDUM Date: February 7, 1973 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager FRO~: Ray E. Lewis, Deputy Chief Engineer SUBJECT: Alignment of Knott Interceptor; Reach 4, Contrac·t No. 3-18 Attached herewith is a memo from Mr. Conrad Hohener of Boyle Engineering regarding the establishment of the alignment for Reach 4 of the Knott Interceptor Trunk Sewer. In a recent conversation with Mr. Marty Carver, Right-of-way Manager for the Southern California Edison Company, he reiterated the comments stated in Mr. Hohener 1 s letter and felt that compen- sation to 1he Edison Company would definitely be a requirement of acquisition. The precedent has been established by the Orange 0oun~y ~Loou Control District in establishing tne right-oi-way for the Westmins·ter Channel through the Edison Company 1 s ~roperty··. · He stated that the evaluation of the Edison property is ~36,000 per acre. In recent meetings with representatives of the pipe industry in establishing construction schedules for Districts• contracts now under construction, it became apparent that this pro.ject should be advertised for bids as soon as possible. The Metropolitan Water District, Los Angeles County Flood Control District and the City of Los Angeles have proposed projects which will be in competition with the pipe requirements for this project. Some of the difficulties in scheduling the Santa Ana River Project and the present contract for the Knott Interceptor are due to pipe deliveries to the contractors. . . Although the staff c~siders the ·original alignment, as presented to the Board, as the most preferable al.ignment because of the elimination of sewer siphons, it mignt be in order to propose, for the Boards' consideration, an alignment which would avoid construction on Main ·street easterl~ of Chestnut Street and also avoid acquisiti~ri of right-of-way from Southern California Edison Company. I suggest an alignment proceeding northerly in Hoover Street from Bolsa Ave. to Hazard t I ' . . . -1-' .. Agenda Item #64 CC-1 District 3 • • February 7, 1973 To: Fred A. Harper, General Manager From: Ray E. Lewis, Deputy Chief Engineer Subject: Alignment of Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract Noo 3-18 Continued Avenue, thence westerly to Chestnut Street, thence northerly to Main Street and continuing westerly in Main Street to Golden West Street to the original alignment as proposed. Although this align- ment may not be completely satisfactory, I personally feel it is imperat.ive that the alignment be established in order that the design engineer can complete the plans and the project can be advertised. Continued delays not only increase the cost of the project, but, I am ~urc, will jeopardize tha progres3 during "-11 constructio~ because of pipe deliveries toihe contractor. -2- Agenda Item #64 CC-2 Ra'y-tE. Lewis Deputy Ch· · District 3 0 • . 'I , : I , r 't {[):g~, .. . 17' ,~/}_ '' , ... ~ . l{J'~; ENGINEERS e ARCHITECTS ENGINEERING " 412 SOUTH LYON STREET SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHONE C714> 547-4471 Fe~ruary 7, 1973 Mr. Fred A. Harper, Genera I Manager County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention Mr. Ray E. Lewis, Deputy Chief Engineer Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18 REPLY TO POST OFFICE BOX 178 ~ince the board of directors meeting of January 10, 1973, I have talked with 'two Edison Company officials several times regarding the status of the proposed PnsemP.nt across their property in the city of Westminster for the subiP.ct prn!P.ct. You will recall I reported to the directors that Mr. William Compton, Area Manager for Edison, had told me Edison would have a decision on the right-of- way request within a week. On January 17, I called Mr. Compton and was informed that a decision had not been reached because they were still waiting for their Substation Design Department to report on the matter. Mr. Compton asked that in the future we contact Mr. Marty Carver, Right-of-way Manager, since the final decision would be made by his office. After repeated calls and leaving my name with his secretary, I finally contacted Mr. Carver on January 23. He informed me that they sti 11 had not received comments from Substation Design. He stated that in his opinion, since this was a· permanent easement reques~, it was un.likely that a favorable decision would be reached in that the property already was greatly encumbered, especially with the new flood control channe I right-of-· way across the northerly end of the property. He cited various other reasons why Edison does not parHcularly like this kind ·of encroachment on their property. Mr. Carver asked me if the district expected to get the easement at no expense, providing it was approved by the various Edison departments, and I said yes·. I told him that I thought this was the circumstance under which Edison was PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING AN 0 ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES Agenda Item #64 CC-3 District 3 .... -------, . '. ,· Mr. Fred A. Harper Page 2 t ' .... ' ...... . . . . ~ February 7, 1973 approached by the city of Westminster. Mr. Carver then told me that under no circumstances does the Southern California Edison Company grant easements of this type without reimbursement. He said the Orange County Flood Control District had purchased the easement for realignment of Westminster channel. At this point I dropped the conversation, since I had no authority from the board or the staff to discuss possible easement charges, and asked Mr. Carver · to call me as soon as he had heard from Substation Design. Since this ·C~n versotion on January 23 with Mr. Carver, I have called him several .times. Each time he has been out and I have asked his secretary to have him call me back. As of th is date I have not heard from Mr. Carver. Last week we checked with the Flood Centro I District staff on the construction schedule for the Westminster channe I. They have received bids, are about to award the contract pending the clearing up of a few right-of-way problems, and expect to start construction within a month. In the design of Contract No. 3-18, we had worked out a cooperative construction schedule with the Flood Control District on the Route B ali£mment. On Hoover Street,, we hod proposed to insta!I savcrol secf'ions of pipe which would cross under the new. flood control construction. Considerable savings could be incurred since this would eliminate tunneling or tearing out the flood control works in the future to build the pipeline. With the sanitation district's schedule being. delayed as much as it has been, we may not be able to work out similar arrangements on the new alignment that is fi na lfy dee ided upon. BOYLE ENGINEERING ·' I · Q <Jo7zuJL,'V-r-/ivr._e,..J17~~ Co~rad Hohener, Jr. c. ·e. 10951 I~ B-C03-109-50 ' . ' ... . : . . .. . ' .. . . .. ' '. BOYLE ENGINEERING • I· /. .· '· ... .· Agenda Item #611 cc-LJ· District 3 FEBRUARY 14, 1973 MEETING #5 -Repor t of Joint Cha irman Chairman Finne ll mentioned the League of Cities Conference next month in Washington, D.C. and asked if any of the Di r ectors were plannin g to attend . Directors Grise t, Root, Fox, Nevi l and Just indicated t hey were . Don Smith reporte d on CASA l\1eeting in San Diego February 2nd & 3rd . Commended Y FJ\H and JVlS for the fine jobs done on their part of the program . Smith said he learned a lot about what is going on in Sacramento at the conf erence and was well worth the time involved . V Davis reported on his attendance at informa l meeting of officials at In ternational Hotel February 7th. Said it meeting and got a lot accomplished. Mentioned that FAH in this organization . Fede ral and State was a real good is high l y respe c ted Finnell also reported that as a resu l t of the CWPCA Calj_fornia Workshops , our General Ma n ager has been invited to participate in a workshop in Hawaii V the early part of March. Finnell then asked for the Directors ' approval for Mr. Harper to attend this workshop . Griset moved that he attend. The mocion was seconded and carried . Duke asked abou t what the tri p would cost and if the Districts wou l d be paying for the trip, and Finnell answered the Districts would pay the cost of the air far e and expenses . 06 -Report of the General Manage~ Mr . Harper reoorted regardin g the Work shoo in Los An~e l es. that thev ·were f~rtunete t 0 have outstandin g peop~~ fro~ Washington , D.C . on penel. Six-hour session . Are three major areas concerned for municipalities and for the Stat8 in implementing the regulations being put together by EPA. One thing that came out of meeting from Mr . Cahill was regarding definition of secondary treatment that EPA published l ast Friday (haven 't seen yet) includes 85% BOD removal; are talking about activated sludge . Mentioned letter in Directors ' folders from EPA and said the r eason this memorandum was prepared was because of the efforts of the Districts when Finnell and FA H went to Washington the early part of December . During discussion with Mr . Sansom gave him copies of th e statements of Con gressman Johnson out of Congressional Record with specific reference made to that which denies this is what the law meant. In disc ussion with EPA people last week they are in agreement with our position that 85 % BOD removal is not significant for ocean discharge . Say tl1eir hands are tied because of way Congress passed the law. One comment was that for ocean dischargers, th ey are going to put these requirements on the "back burner ." EPA is making a new "Needs" survey. Contacting dischargers through state and regional offices for updated numbers for construction of facilities to reach the lev el of tre atment of 85% BOD. We have been using $10 5 mil l ion for next five years . Now will probably have to add $20 million to that figure. Think we have a lot of support at State level and regional l evel of EPA and am sure we can pick up support from othe~ agencies on th e coast. Appear s that we are go ing to have to go back to PubJ_ic Works Committ ee in House and Senate and ge t something changed in this area . Once Needs Survey is complete d a nd EPA has the numbers, think we c an talk in pretty good terms . Will prepare some i~forrnation for thos e that are going to Wash ington next month and will g;Lve them the name and telephone number of attorney for AM~A (Le e White) who will help Directors in any way h e can . AMSA people have taken a po s i t ion on this and are in full agreement. p . 2 Griset asked 1v liat techn ology -b ased approach meant , and Mr . Harpe r answered that when spe akjng of secondarytreatment, they are taking literal interpreta- tion of what it stat es in the law and EPA administrators have def i ned what definition of seconda ry t reatment wil l be to everyone in U.S . First definition approached tertiary· treatment but was c hanged from that . Back to original concept of 85% BOD removal . The fact that we are asking for waiver of the 85% BOD remov al is becau s e of what was published by EPA and Federal Regis ter to allow exce ption on this . The Chairman of the State Board spoke at me eting in San Diego and said costs for Ocean Plan are going to be $400 -$7 00 million and if they go to 85% BOD removal , will go to over $1-l/2bil lion . #7 -Report of the General Counse l Regarding Norman Tremblay against Districts, court's decision a llows them to collect overtime accrue d from December 1, 1966 to October 1, 1 970 which is $2,974.30. The reason they allowed thi s recovery was because in 1 966 the Districts adopt ed two resolutions which said no compensation f or overtime in one se ction and then in another section it leads to uncerta-inty with regard to de ath. No compensation for overtime from October 1 963 until Dec ember 1966 . Al s o awarded a refund of $600 which had been withheld be cause o f di~ability paid. Wasn't any particular r esolution governing this . Repor ted on l egislat ion discussed in Attorneys Comm i ttee at CASA Meeting . About 1 5-20 attorney s represent ing agencies throughout the State. Regarding SB 889 (B ill to try to clean up the Environm e ntal Quality Act), are to put study on for 120 days. Some of the highlights of this legislature is that there are g uidelines that are suppose to be put out through Resourc es· Agency of the State . Due February 1st put not o ut yet. When we get tho se, will have guidelines with which to set up our rules and regulationR As ~n ~hP w~yR tn pr e p~r p Fnvi~onmPn~~l ~m ~R~t Rppn~t~. Ce~tain things ~.;e will uot have to p repare a repo1't on. Gen<=r a lly speaking , administerial acts will n ot require environme ntal imp act report s . One of th e definition s t hat we wil l be concerned with is "lead agency 11 -one havin g the princip le r espons ibility for carrying out and approving project which may have a s ignificant affect on the environment . If building a trunk sewer, wi ll prepare one single report for submission t o all cities or agencies invo lved. Regar ding SB 90 (Bi ll that limits the tax rate), th e Districts wi ll be limit e d to the tax rates i n effect for 1972-73 for the ir maximum . Are exce ptions to tha t and ways to get some relief. One feature which Districts will be lookin g forward to is reimbursement for mandated acts enacted after January 1, 1973. Language in Bill quite uncertain . Effective date for l egislation enacted in l ast legislature is Ma rch 7th. Some of the admini - strative interpretation wo uld indicate that they int end to try io avoid Stat e fundi ng of this typ e o f activity . Anticipate substantial problem. Chairman o f thi& comm ittee is Peggy McG illigott(?) and is on a special commi ttee to re solve uncertaint ie s of SB 90 . Wi ll try to get an amendment through to cle ar t hese up in our favor, or leave l anguage like ~t is so we could win in court if we have to . Will be an amendment passed by this le gislature affect ing SB 90 as it is now. One of the things to be aware of if any inc rea sed l eve l of service is required, ~e must submit claims for reimbursement to th e State within 45 days after the effective dat e . Staff will b e looking to see if there is any extra costs involved to the Districts by new l aws and must get them in .to the State . After the first year, claims wjll be fi led annually on October 31 st . Re Se c tion 208 of Water Pol lution Control Act, federal gove rnment-hasn 't prese nt ed it yet so Governer hasn 't had a ch a nce to present it . This area may not be select ed as an area having signific ant problems . If not selected, regional control o n pollution will be done at State level . Act ion on this shoul d b e after fede ral guide lines are out & acted on by Governer . ~ p . 3 Green stated regarding SB 889 that 6 0-da y p er i o d is n ow runn i ng for local gover.nment to come up with the ir own guide lines to b e consistent with state guideli nes by Apri l 4th . Guidelines h a ve b een out fo r almo st t wo weeks . Fin n ell q uestione d whe t her t h e 45-day limi tation t o s u bm i t c l a ims .to State migh t occur between Board me et ings a nd Ni sson answe r e d that it could . Finnell then s u ggested that Directors mi ght wa n t to c onsider g iving E xe c utive Committee authority to submit those claims o n b e h alf of the Districts so there wou ld be only a ma x imu m interva l of 14 days . Nis s en s u ggested that i t wo uld be j u st as we ll to give t h e authority to the General Manage r . Ky ml a move d that t h e Ge n e r a l Man ager b e gi v en a ut h ority t o submit c l aims to t he Stat e . Mo tion was se c o n ded and carrie d. #9(c ) -Miller stated th at he thou g ht the a p pearance of the Plant grounds h a d b een o ut s t anding . E XECUTIVE SESSION 8 :1 6 -9 :30 #1 2 -Items considered in exe c utive s es sion : F i n nell a n no u nced that a mot io n estab l ishing posit ion of Ch ief Engine er would be i n order . Mo tion wa s made a nd seconde d. Dire ctor Winn moved t h e fo llow i ng: (3-fo l d mo t ion he s a id) That the Gene r al Manager and Departme nt Heads b e furn i s h e d a l ea sed c a r in p l ace of the Company -owned vehicle , e q uivalen t to the t y pe of car !~~ni=~~! t0 ~ai~va & depart me1 1t heads wl thin the County of Orenge und e ~ Ma ster Co u nty Lease (S c hedul e o f cars ava ilable in FAH offic e); a nd That the following salaries b e estab lished for the Genera l Manage r and v arious Department Heads ret r oactive t o J anuary 1, 1 973 . General Manager $33 ,000/yr. Director of Finance Step 5 of Range 62C -$2 ,113/mo . Chief Engineer Step 5 o f Range 63A -2 ,17 2/mo . Director of Ope rat ions & La b oratories Step 5 o f Ra n ge 61 1 >919/mo . Maintenance Sup e rintende nt Step 5 o f Ra n ge 60B -1,867/mo . (and moved that t h e Commi t tee n ow be dis so l ved but ret r ac t e d t h a t part of the motion) Abo v e mot i o n was seconde d . It was then s t ated that t hi s motion s hou ld be s u b j e c t to a wr itten opinion fr om IRS that says t h at the s e in crease s cou ld be paid . Spe c ia l Commit tee i nd i cated that they were a·greeable to i n cluding t hat s tipu l at i o n in t h e ir motion and it was mo ve d and seconded to include i t . There was ·the n a cal l for the question, and the amende d mot i on was voted on and c ar r i ed . Wi nn then moved that this Spe'cial Comm i ttee be diss:olved . There was t h e n a motion to table that motion which fo llowed with some discussion . A po int of order was brough t u p that there shoul d be n o discussion on a motion to t a ble . Motion to table was voted on a nd carried . FAH expressed apprec i ation fo r increases on behal f of department h e a ds . Al so said that as he had expressed previ ously, be l ieved that if people in h i s position wanted t o make that type of mone y, s h ould get i nto p riva t e enterprise. Said he f e l t that the increase grant ed him was not warra n ted, l I p. 4 and would a ppreciate it if they would rec onsi d er that. Appreciate the automobile and think that would be just compensation. It was moved that the motion re gardi ng the Gene ral ·Manager 's salary be written the way it was originally worde d. #13 -Employing Rutan & Tucke r r e Spec i a l Trial Counsel. Two Directors asked that they be shown as oprosing motion--Seal Beach (?) and (?) #14 -Family Health Program Inc. Just asked if Family Health Prog r am faci l ities had been checked out wh ile in operation and JWS answered that yes they had been. #1 7 -SCCWRP Lindsle y Par sons reported that despite the fact that this st ~dy was one of the first s t udies of its kind ever undertaken , they anticipate that the first three -year phase will come to a successful conclusion and th at the final chapters and the chapters conc erning the conclusion and recom- mendation wi ll go to printers before the end ·of this mont h and sho uld be in our hands a r ound the 1 0th or 15th of March. Smith asked if Parson s could be i nvi ted to the next meeting t o report further and the Joint Chairman i~ited him to the Ma rch meeting . #1 9 -JWS financial report ~ne co~nen~ was made tnac ~nis repor~ was more interesting than t he report they were formerly receiving from the auditing firm . (Good job!!!) #20 -WPCF & AMSA Meetings Jus t asked F inn e ll if he was going to be able to go and said they should .._. authori ze an additional person to attend . Motion was made to amend the motion to inc lude Joi nt Chairman or Dir ect or he d e le g ates and one other Director to attend meetings . Motion seconded and carried . Finne ll stat e d that advisability of Directors attending should be dependent upon legislative status of secondary trea tment and wo ul d k eep Directors advise d . #24 -ALL DIST RICTS Other Business ~~i nn e ll called the meeting of the Executive Committee for the 27th and ~ invited Directors Winn and Nevil to attend . Motion was mad e again to dissolve Special Committee 6n Compensation of Depart ment Heads. Motion out of order because it was previously tabled . The re was a motion to take it off the table but wasn't seconded . i Question was asked with regard to when the Special Committee on Directors ' Fees for Concurrent Board Me etings was going to report and Just answered that committee met twi c e in las t month and would be prepared to make a report and recomm e ndation for March meeting. Culver mentioned that the Bill regarding this does not go into effect until Ma rch 7th. p. 5 #25 -Sully-M iller claim re 7-6-1 Vanderwaal quest ioned wh y we s hould hire Rutan & Tucker r e Special Trial Counse l and t h e n fight Rutan & Tucker re Sully-Miller claim . Nissen stated that there was no connect ion between thi s contract and that of Peter Kiewitt 's and he didn't see any conflict. Finnell also pointe d out that a ll of the attorneys that he talked to did , at one time or another, r epresent people in actions against the Di stri cts or the opposin g party in t he outfall suit a nd that h ad no baring on the on the case tha t we we re hiring the m for . #42 -Traffic control on Pacific Coas t Highway re 5 -19 Ray Lewis report ed that some of th e pro blems encountered h ave resulted because of some of the requirements imposed by encroachment permi t of Stat e Division of Highways. No parking on so uth side of highway unti l street improv ements are done . Because of inc onvenience to merchants, have approached Divis ion of Highways to be gin parking again but they said it will cost Districts about $5,500 to go a h e ad \·lith partial restriping . Lewis s a id in his op inion this was not an investment the District should go into at thi s time as contractor shou ld be out of the highway in a very short period of time . State is proceeding with their construction and should have it completed by June 1 st . Appro ached State in s h ar ing this cost and it is no t accept ab le to Divi si on of Highways. Mot ion was made t o accept re port, seconded and carried . #53 -Ordinance No . 2 0 3 8 mi~h requested continuance of this item until afte r District 3 's ~eeting to see what might be helpful to Distric t 2 r egarding connection fees . Asked when Dis trict 3 expected consultant's r eport . Culve r answ e red they were planning on considering it at a meeting on Mar ch 15th . It was moved and seconded to continue considerat i on of ordinance until after District 3 's meeting . Smith requested t hat a date be establis h ed . An amendment t o the motion was then made to c ontinue item to April meeting . Winn asked Smith if they could have a spe cial meet ing on this rathe r th an keep coming bac k to Join t Boards . Mr . Ha r per stated that they would be ab l e to furnish District 2 's Board with results of Di st ri ct 3 's report by next joint meeting . Suggested that at that time the Board c ould set a dat e fo r an adjourned meet ing . The motion was then restat e d to cont inue consid eration of t hi s ordinance to Ma rch 14 at which time a dat e will be set for further cons i de r ation of Or dinance 20 3. Motion was seconde d a nd carried . #5 7 -Santa Ana River Interceptor , From Katella Ave . to La Palma Ave . Don Martinson referred Director s to maps i n their fol ders re a lignment of 2-14-2. Original map followed westerly and northerly alignment. In mo r e detailed studies it b e came obvious that that was not a good alignment bec ause wester l y bank was ver'y unstable . Aft er st udyin g matter and upon recommendation by Flood Control District , r e~oute d 'to easterly side of the river. New a li gnment several thousand do l lars cheaper . Are fin alizin g plans for alignment a nd about ready to submit to Districts , City of Anaheim and other agencies invo l ved. Finn e ll asked if anyb ody had seen these plans and Martinson answered they have been working with Di stricts, OCWD , OCFCO , and City of Anaheim . Property owned principally by OCWD from Kate lla to · La Palma . Smith stated tha t this prop e rty i s also within City of Orange and aske d why the y didn 't include Or a n g e in th e ir consultations . Martinson s~id th e y would b e f iling plans with City of Orange also . .. p . 6 Finnell mentioned that they h ad a number of other trunks wh ose construction was tied with g etting to the Riverside Freeway , and Don Martins on stated . that the map showed Carbon Canyon Sewer com ing down to La Pa l ma and tie s into Santa Ana River Interc eptor. Smith asked if that made two river crossings at Santa Ana Rive r and Ma rti nson answered yes and it was still l e ss expensive. Smith asked if connections with interceptor coming fro m north and east changed configuration and if we had them i n Mas ter Plan . Don Martinson answerP.d t hat it was completely in accordanc e wi th goal of Master Plan progr am . Brings u s to a po int where we can connect these interceptor sewers to Santa Ana River Interceptor . Mo tion made to accept progress re port. Seconded and carried. #64 -Knott Interceptor , 3-18 Conrad Ho hener reported that he re ceived a call from Southern Califor11ia Edison Comp any and they informed him that Edison had den i ed the Districts request t o obtain easement across property . The princ ipa l reason being that property was heavily encumbered which would cau se th em prob lems in t h e new sub stat i on b eing built on their property. Un der no circumstances wou l d they approve easement even i f we Hould p urchase it . Mr . Hohener said as far as condemning the property , wou ld have to go t hrough Pub l ic Utilities Commissi o n and wo uld entai l a l ong proc ed ure . Sugge sted t hat District s go a long with Alternative 2 subjec t to being able to wo r k out construction s ch ed ul e with OCFCD where re -ali gning channel . If this could not b e wo rke d out, would consider Alternative 3, c ontingent with City of West minster approval ; and if this could not be wo rked out , would go to Alternative 4 . Re commend either 2 , 3 or 4, or a comb in at ion th ereof . Would probably take about a week to get a ll parties toge ther and g et tentative agreements, and then would immediately final ize the plan s wh ic h wou l d take a bout six weeks . McW hinney aske d if th e City of Westminster cou l d stop u s if we decide to go ahead and Nisson answe red that t h ey could not . Questions was asked since we are now back a lmos t to or i g inal plan, what ,,._.. is objection to Alternat ive 1. ~w . Hohener said that City Counci l denied Route B or Alternative 1 because of ro uting through several block s of r esidential area on easterly side of Main Street. At that time we o nly submitted Routes A, B , & C and h ave not seen thes e other alternatives . Have not discussed with City Council whether they wou l d go along with westerly s id e of Ma i n Street. Would pro bab ly go along with gree n r oute on map . McWhinne y stated he thought we shoul d r econs ider cheapes t route . Nisson restated that you don't have to have City's approval . Submit it to them and if they deny it, can try to wo rk with them or take actions necessary . Comment wa s made that we didn 't worry about Hunt;ington Be ach , so why worry about Westminster, and McWhinn ey added that since we have been wo rry ing about mo n ey, why not save her,e . Finnell announced that they were ready for a motiori to adopt Ro ute B. Th e motion was made and seconded . Culver re minded Directors that the reason Mr . Hohener had stayed awa y from Route B was because City of Westminster and citizens gave us so much opposition and if we run into a stone wall on this, wi ll delay it longer ;. Finne ll then stated that if they moved to go ahead on Route B , General Counsel would have to do the same thing as wit h Huntington Beach . p . 7 Scott commented that it was true that they will have problems with citiz ens but have had prob lems in Fountain Valley a lso. Voted on motion approving Route B and carried. Finnell stated t his was certainly no t an arbitrary decision by the Directors and had really attempted to work something out . The effort of the Directors was commendable . Ni sson recommended that in order not to delay work, that the General Counse l be authorized to institute a suit , if nec essary, to allow Di s trict to move ahead o n Route B. This was made into a motion , seconded and carried. I EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF D.IRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, OF ORP .. NGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., Feb~uary 14 , 19 73 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain ~ Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The· roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District's Board. ~ * * * * * * * * ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing alternate group health plan with Following a brief discussion, it was moved, seconded and duly ·carried: Family Health Program, Inc. That the report and recommendation of the Joint·staff Management/Employee Committee on alternate group health insurance program, be. received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be authorized to execute a contract with Family Health Program, Inc. to provide an alternate group health plan for Districts' employees. ·STA~E OF CALIFORNIA~ SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitat~on Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, · tru~ and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors ·on the 14th day of February ' 19 73 8th S-107 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have day of March, 1973. my hand this f ~t,!te--Roards of Directors nty , ai'l;.i-i?~~i-~fb Districts Nos. 3 r.;' tr --7 -and:" 11 ' <' . -' , -.-:;--/'. -- .. EX CERPTS F ROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOI NT MEET I NG OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATI ON DI STR I CT S NO S . 1, 2, 3, 5 , 6, 7 and 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY , CAL IFORNIA A regular joint meeting of t h e Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Di s tri c ts Nos. 1, 2 , 3, 5, 6 , 7, and 11, of Or ange County, California, was held at the hou r of 7 :30 p .m., February 1 4 , 19 73 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California . The Chairman of the Joint ·A dminis trative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p .m. · The roll was called a nd the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District 1 s Board . DISTRICT 3 Appro val of routing Knott Interce ptor Contrac t No . 3-1 8 for * * * * * * * * * Conrad Hohener of Boyle En gineeri ng , District's consult i ng engineer, repo r ted that Southern California Edison Company had denied the District's requ~st for an easement across their right of way i n connection with construction of the Knott Interc eptor, Reach 4, Contract No . 3-1 8 through the Ci ty of Westminst er. Mr. Hohene r then reviewed the several alternative routes for the project which have been considered. ~he Board then entered int o a lengthy discussion concerninK Route B which had o riginall y been recommended by the engineers , but recon sidered by the Board at the. request of the City of Westminster . Several Directors expr essed their co ncern ove r possib le further delays of the ur ge ntly needed fac ility and that inasmu ch as · attempts to work out a r ea li gnment of the interceptor thro ~g h the City of Westminster had proven unsuccessful, that Route B be adopted as the best and most economic a l alignment. Following further discussion, it was moved, seconded and duly carried that Route B for the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract - No. 3-18, be adopted ; and , FURTHER MOVED : That in the e v ent necessary permit~ required for the cons truction of said interceptor are not issued by the City of Westminster or other jurisdictional a ge nc i es, th e General Counsel be authorized to take necessary l egal action to allow the Distri ct to p roceed with con struction of the Knott Interceptor , Reach 4, Contract No . 3-18, in accordance with the adopted alignment. STA.t'E OF CALIFORNIAl SS . COUNTY OF ORANG E I, J. WAY NE SYLVES TE R, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos . 1 , 2 , 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California , · do h e r eby certify that the above a nd foregoing to be full, true and cqr rect copy of minute entries on meeting of said Bo ards of Directors on the 1 4th day of Februa ry 19 7 3 . , 14t h I N WITNE SS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this d~y· of Fe bruary, 1973 . Secre t ary of the Boards of Directors o f County Sanitation Districts Nos . 1, 21 3, 5 , 6, 7, and 11