The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1973-01-10COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX Bl 27, FOUNTAIN VALLE:Y, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) January 5, 1973 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SA1.JITATION DISTRICTS NO~. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, AND 11 Gentlemen: TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and ll, of Orange County, California, will be held: Wednesday evening, Janu~ry JO, 1973 at 7:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Tentative adjournments p~ior to next regular meeting: Special Co~mittee on Compensation of Depar·tment Heads Dlstrict No. 2 Executive Committee - 5:30 p.m., January 10 (Immediately preceding Joint Meet~ng) 7:30 p.m., January 17 5:30 p.m., January 30 MEETING DATE Ja~. 10. 1973 TIME 7:30 o.m. DiSTRICTS l,2,3>5,6,7,8 & 11 DISTRICT 1 ACTIVE DIRECTORS (HERRIN)····· GR I SET····· ~ ---- (CASPERS) •••• BATTIN ••••• ~ ___ _ (WELSH) •••••• MILLER ••••• ~ __ -- PORTER • • • • . ~ ___ _ DISTRICT 2 (PE~EZ)·······SMITH······ ( WEDAA) • • • • • • • CASTRO· • • • • · CULVER····· ~NGER)······FINNELL···· KOWALSKI)····FOX········ GRISET)······HERRIN····· HOLLI ND~N) • ··JUST· • • • • • • ROBERTS)·····NEVIL······ CASPERS)···· ·BAKER··· • • · REINHARDT)···ROOT:······ DUTTO~)······STEPHENSON· DUNNEJ·······WINN······· DISTRICT 3 CULVER ••••• ~CASPE~S) •••• BATTIN ••••• HINES •••••• DAV IS •••••• ~KOWAysKr) ••. FOX •••••••• COEN ••••••• GREEN •••••• rRISET) •• • • • HERRIN····· FRANK I EW I CH). LACAYO ••••• NUIJENS). • • • LEW IS • • • • • • MILLER) •• • • • LONG • • ••••• MC WH I NNEY • ~RE I NHAROT) • • ROOT ••••••• BLACKMAN). • • • SALES •••••• (. 'LLI N~EN ). • • SCOTT •••••• ~1'CJTTON • • • • • • STEPHENSON • ROBERTSl •••• STEVENS •••• BYRNE) ••••••• VANDERWAAL. DISTRICT 5 i../ ---- ~ ---- ~--- ~----cc-______ ~--- ~--- ~---- ~---- ~----~ ------~ ---- ~---- ~----CL------- (l:.,... ------ ~---- ~---- ~---- ~---- ~---- ~---- _..L. ---- ~---- ~---- ~---- ~---- ~---- JO I NT BOARDS ACTIVE DIRECTORS ~LANGER)······FINNELL····· ~ ~ CASPERS)····· BAKER······· ~ -- CASPERS)· • • • • B.'\TT ! N · • • = • = ~-·----· CASPERS····· a...._ --(~iEDAA) • • • • • ··CASTRO· • • • • • __!:::::::: -- (CASPERS)····· CLARK········ ~ -- CULVER······ ~ -- (HINES)······ ·DAVIS······· ~ -- (COEN)······· ·DUKE········ _.....-----(KOWA~SKI) ····FOX········· ~ --~1 CU~Nl · ·······GIBBS·······~~- COEN) • • • • • • • ·GREEN· • • • • • • __J:::::::. -- HERRIN)····· ·GRISET· • • • • • ~ -- GRISET) ······HERRIN······ ~ -- (HOLL I NDE~) • • ·,JUST· • • • • • • • ~ --~MC INN I S1 • • • ·KYM LA·· • • • • • .......L-=--- FRANKI EYH CH) ·LACAYO······ ~ -- NUIJENS) ·····LEWIS·······~ -- (MILLER) • • • • ··LONG· • • • • • • • ~ -- (CROUL) • • • • • • ·MC INNIS·· • • ~ __ MCWHINNEY·· ~- (WELSH)··· ····MILLER······ ~ __ (ROBERTS)·····NEVIL······· --=:::::: __ ' .;-: ·> • • • •• ----PORTER· • • • • • i---__ (FI SHBACH) ····QUIGLEY····· ~ __ (MC INNIS) • • • ·ROGERS· • • • • • ~ __ RE I NHARDT) • • ·ROOT· • • • • • • • . ~ BLACKMAN)····SALES······· -- ) ~-- HOLL I ~DEN .-• ·SCOTT· • • • • • • PEREZ )'·····SMITH······· ~==== DUTTON ). • • • • ·STEPHENSON· • ~ __ ROBERTS • • • • ·STEVENS· • • • • ~ __ MC INNIS)··· ·STORE······· ~-- BYRNE)······ • VANDERWAAL • • ~-- (DUNNE)······· WINN········ ~-- * * * * * ( ) (JOHNSON) CROUL ••••••• MC INNIS ••• ~ ----BOYD········ ---- MITCHELL···· ----(BAKER) ••••••• CPtSF ERS • • . • \./""" ----• KYMLA • • • • • • ~ - -OTHERS DISTRICT 6 PORTER • • • • • ~ ---- (BAKER)··· • • • C/48PE!RS · · · • ~ ---- (MC INNIS) ••• STORE······ ~---- DISTRICT 7 (WELSH) •••••• MILLER····· (CASPERS) • • • • CLARK • • • • • • (HERRIN) • • • • • GRISET • • • • • PORTER ••• • • ~FI SCHBACti ). • • QUIGLEY •••• MC INNIS) •••• ROGERS ••••• PEREZ) •••••• SMITH •••••• L.,,,,~RICT 11 (COEN) ••••••• GIBBS • • • • • • (CASP~RS) • • • • BAKER • • • • • • (COEN) • • • • • • • DUKE • • • • • • • DISTRICT 8 -~z:. ~f lt:\~l.J~'-' (JOHNSQN). • • • • BO'fb • • • • • • • (CLARK) ••••••• CASPERS • • • • MITCHELL • • • 12/1/72 ~---- ~---- ~---- ~----~---- ~--- ~---- ~-- ~---- ~--_...__ ~---- (,(_,,,, ---- ~ ---- HARPER BR8HN SYLVESTER LEWIS DUNN CLARKE SIGLER NISSON TAYLOR BROWN BOETTNER CARLSON FINSTER GALLOWAY HOH EN ER HOWARD HUNT KEITH LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON MURONEY PIERSALL STEVENS .KENNEY .. II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P. 0. Box 8127 10844 Ellis Ave nue Fountain Valley, Cal i F., 92708 JOINT BOARDS Preliminary A G E N D A 1/5/73 January 10, 1973 -7:30 p.m . (1) Pledge of Al l egiance and Invocation ( 2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chair men pro tern, if necessary (4) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from the Board of S upervisors show ing appointment of Director and alternate to serve on the Districts' Boards (5) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings , as mailed: District 1 District 2 District 3 District 5 District 6 District 7 District 8 District 11 (6) ALL DISTRICTS December 13~ 1972 regular December 13, 1972 regular, and December 20, 1972 adjourned (Copy in Directors' meeting folders) December 13, 1972 regular,and January 3, 1973 adjourned (Copy in Directors' meeting folders) December 13, 1972 regular December 13, 1972 regular December 13, 1972 regular, and January 3, 1973 adjourned (Copy in Directors' meeting folders) October 11, 1972 regular Dece mber 1 3 , 1972 regular Report of the Joint Chairman (7) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager (8) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Counsel (9) ALL DISTR I CTS Cons ideration of mot ion to convene in executive session re personnel matters (10) ALL DISTRICTS Considerati o n of motion to reconvene in regular s ession (11) ALL DISTRICTS Action on items considered in executive session: (a) Consideration of motion approving Memorandum of Agreement with Orange County Employees Association (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 73-1, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 71-3, as amended (Copy in Directors! meeting folders) (12) ALL DISTRICTS Report of Special Committee on Compensation of Department Heads (13) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report (14) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (a) Consideration of motion authorizing attendance of Board members at the Water Pollution Control Federation Workshop on 1972 Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments in Los Angeles on February 8, 1973· (b) Consideration of motion authorizing renewal of memberships in the California Association of Sanitation Agencies and the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies for the 1973 calendar year, and approving payment of annual dues of $1,400 and $1,300, respectively (c) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to purchase up to $15,000 of chemical . coagulants from major chemical manufacturers to be used in a sludge centrifuging test operation for high rate solids removal (d) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to execute a Memorandum of Understanding in connection with participation in a cooperative study of the feasibility of using solid wastes and sludge as an alternate fuel source (15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 73-11, approving and authorizing submission of preliminary technical report to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, as required by the State Water Resources Control Board's Water Quality Control Plan for the Ocean Waters of California. See page "D" -2- (16) ALL DISTRICTS * * * * * * * * * * * CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered separately in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. (a) Consideration of motion ratifying action of General Manager in issuing purchase order to Porter Boiler Service for emergency repairs to Treatment Plant No. 2 boiler, and authorizing payment for said repairs in an amount not to exceed $3,300 (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tab- ulation and award Sale of Scrap Metal, Specific~tion No. S-009, to the highest and best bidder. See page ''Efi (Copy in Directors' meeting folders) (c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 7, to the plans and specifications for Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8, authorizing an addition of $6,780.00 to the contract with Kordick & Rados, A Joint Venture. See page "F" (d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 8, to the plans and specifications for Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities and a total deduction of $61, 021. 97 to the contract with Kordick & Rados, A Joint Venture. See page "G" (e) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 9, to the plans and specifications for Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8, granting an extension of time of 78 calendar days to the contract with Kordick & Rados, A Joint Venture. See page "H" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on Page 4) -3- (16) CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 73-3, accepting Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving final closeout agreement. See page "I" (17) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any (17a) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5, to the plans and specifications for Administration-Engineering Building Addition, Job No. J-7-2, authorizing an addition of $5,749.56 and granting an extension of time of 74 calendar days, to the contract with B. H. Miller Construction Company. See page "J" (17b) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 73-2, accepting Administration-Engineering Building Addition, Job No. J-7-2, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving final closeout agreement. See page "K" (18) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file certification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills a~pearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment (19) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving warrant books for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing payment of claims listed on page "A" (20) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications, if any (21) DISTRICTS 3, 5 & 11 Consideration of motion directing the staff to evaluate condition of Districts' trunk sewer manholes and to prepare recommendation for contractual repairs where deemed necessary. See page· "L". (22) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of Resolution No. 73-4-1, authorizing execution of agreement with Hemisphere Constructors, Inc. regarding the effects of Proposition 20 on the construction of Digesters "N" and "O" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-21, as recommended by the General Counsel. See page "M" (23) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of Resolution No. 73-5-1, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Digesters "N" and "O" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-21, to Hemisphere Contructors, Inc. in the amount of $1, 068, 413. 00. See pages "N" and "O" (24) DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants, if any. See page "C" (25)· DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "B" -4- (26) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications, if any (27) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (28) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress report on construction of Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, From Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1. See page "P" (29) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any See page "B" (30) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications, if any (31) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., January 17, 1973 (32) DISTRICT 5 & 6 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress report on construction of Sewer Trunk "B" -Unit 8, Pacific Coast Highway Force Main,Contract No. 5-19. See page "Q" (33) DipTRICTS 5 & 6 Consideration of motion approv~ng suspense fund warrants, if any. See page "B" (34) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "B" (35) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications, if any (36) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (37) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "C" (38) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications, if any (39) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (40) DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion to receive and file annual report submitted by Hanson, Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester, Certified Public Accountants, for the year ending June 30, 1972, previously mailed to Directors by Auditors. (41) DISTRICT 8 Other business and communications, if any (42) DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to adjourn -5- (43) DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants, if any. See page "B" (44) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page f!C" (45) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications, if any (46) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (47) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress report on construction of West Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 19, 20 and 22, Contract No. 7-5-lR. See page "R" (48) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 73-6-7, authorizing acceptance of Grant of Easement from Irvine Industrial Complex, for permanent easement in connection with Gisler Red Hill Trunk, Schedule B, Contract No. 7-1, in exchange for quitclaiming a portion of easement relative to abandoned section of Old Army Air Base line, at no cost to the District. See page "S" (49) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 73-7-7, authorizing execution of Quitclaim Deed to Irvine Industrial Complex for portion of easement relative to abandoned section of Old Army Air Base trunk, in exchange for permanent easement in connection with Gisler Red Hill Trunk, Schedule B, Contract No. 7-1. See page "T" (50) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "C" (51) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications, if any (52) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (53) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of Resolution No. 73-8-3, authorizing acceptance of Corporation Grant Deed from W I R Developers, Inc. relative to right of way for Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-2, southerly of Bolsa on the easterly side of the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way, at no cost to the District, in exchange for quitclaiming a portion of easement relative to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-2. See page "U" (54) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of Resolution No. 73-9-3, authorizing execution of an agreement with WI R Developers, Inc., providing for paving of right of way received in fee, in exchange for quitclaiming a portion of easement relative to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-2, at no cost to the District. See page "V" (55) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of Resolution No. 73-10-3, authorizing execution of a Quitclaim Deed to W I R Developers, Inc. for portion of existing District easement relative to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-2. See page "W" -6- (56) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress report on construction of the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1, and Reaches 2 and 3, Contract No. 3-17. See page "XTI ( 57) DISTRICT 3 Further consideration of routing of Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18, through the City of Westminster, deferred from r~gular meeti~g cf D~cc~bcr 13, l972. ( 58) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal submitted by dated , for financial consulting services in connection with funding of District's Master Plan Trunk Sewer program. See page "Y 11 (Copy in Directors' meeting folders) ( 59) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "B" ( 60) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications, if any (61) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn -7- i ... II I ! BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 of Orange County, California II FILE --- FILE ---··-··-··- (1) (2) ( 3) (5) ~\~ l£nER ·······-··- A/C _.lKl.R -@/ ~' @; FILE ----(9) LETI'ER ····--- A/C •••• TKLR - -······-··-(10) --·· .. ···-··-·-... JOINT BOARDS Final A G E N D A 1/10/73 January 10, 1973 -7:30 p.m. ADJOURNMENTS POSTED/ COMP & MILEAGE ..••• ~" FILES SET UP ....... ~ ....... .. RESOLUTIONS CERTIFIED •• \("" Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation LETfERS WRITTEN ..... ;.::;/"M MINUTES WRITTEN .........•.• - Roll Call (~c 'l\.L&~'--v~--... ~·~ ~ u-\. 2) Appointment of ~airmen pro tern, if necessary MINUTES l-ILED .....• ~ EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 District 2 District 3 District 5 District 6 District 7 District 11 ALL DISTRICTS December 13, 1972 regular December 13, 1972 regular, and December 20, 1972 adjourr.ed (Copy in Directors' meeting folders) December 13, 1972 regular, and January 3, 1973 adjourned (Copy in Directors' meeting folders) December 13, 1972 regular December 13, 1972 regular December 13, 1972 regular, and January 3, 1973 adjourned (Copy in Directors' meeting folders) Oc~er 11~972 reg~r December 13, 19'72 regular Report of the Joint Chairman ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager ~.13,11.--c~j ~~cu,t,-s...~"' ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Counsel ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to convene in executive session re personnel matters ~ ·. 01 ALL DISTRrcrrs Con..., ide,.,,ation of motion to recor:Yene in regular Bession ~ «d..~ ~~---~~ A~~t~~~T~~CI~ems considered in executive session: A/C::. TKLR .... .N\ \ _s ---···············•4 I ......... ------ FILE-·-·-- LETTER -----1{;'_2 ),, A/C ____ TKLR ---~ _J ----······-··- ....------··-··-__.,,,.,. t 1it ;~ \r ~ (14) FILE --- LETTER ~-a A/C .••• TKlR - -·················- ·····················--- (a) Consideration of motion approving Memorandum of Agreement with Orange County Employees Association (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 70-3 and Resolution No. 73-1, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 71-3, as amended, and Conditions of Employment Resolution !Tr;\ ~o. ~0-3 .(Copy in ?irectors' meeti~g folders) ArZDI~~~~~ ~<-,<Si.. ~v.. ,,...._,~~ Report of Special Committee on Compensation of Department Heads ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (a) (b) Consideration of motion authorizing attendance of Board members at the Water Pollution Control Federation Workshop on 1972 Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments in Los Angeles on February 8, 1973· FILE --- LETTERlliL Consideration of motion authorizing renewal of memberships in the California Association of Sanitation Agencies and the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies for the 1973 calendar year, and approving payment of annual dues of $1,400 and $1,300, respectively A/C •••• TKLR -- (F1t.f\-~ ' . LETTER ···---- A/C •••• TKLR - ----·-·······----- (c) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to purchase up to $15,000 of chemical coagulants from major chemical manufacturers to be used in a sludge centrifuging test operation for high rate solids removal -····~~(d) LEnER .F..tll"L A/C •••. TKLR - Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to execute a Memorandum of Understanding in connection with participation in a cooperative study of the feasibility of using solid wastes and sludge as an alternate fuel source ................. ----··-- FILE 11 a \ • ~ :CI ,\/\ I.._., lETTER ~ A/C •••• TKLR - ALL DISTRICTS :&·~_.:,_Lj..l.;v _. Consideration of Resolution No. 73-11, approv'i\ig and authorizing submission of final technical report to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, as requireci by the State Water Resources Control Board's Water C .tali ty Control Plan for the Ocean Waters of California. See page "D" -2- (16) ALL DISTRICTS FILE ·-- LETTER -- A/C •••• TKLR - .£ .. ~.: ....... Y-:::.. ........................... _ .. _____ _ * * * * * * * * * * * CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or_ further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered separately in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * *· * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. <a) Consideration of motion ratifying action of General Manager in issuing purchase order to Porter Boiler Service for emergency repairs to Treatment Plant No. 2 boiler, and authorizing payment for said repairs in an amount.not to exceed $3,300 FILE ___ (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and award Sale of Scrap Metal, Specification No. S-009, for Ferrous Metal to Steverson Bros., and for Non-Ferrous Metal to LETTER _____. A/C .... TKlR - .t.Q, ........ ~ FILE ..... -... --( C) LETTER··- A/C •••• TKLR - ··------------------ ............................... ---- (d) FILE • LETTER.- A/C •••• TKLR - .............................. -..... (e) FILE--- LETTat --- A/C .... TKlR - ............................ -·--- --·-··--- Key Metals, Inc. See page "E" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 7, to the plans and specifications for Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8, authorizing an addition of $6,780.00 to the contract with Kordick & Rados, A Joint Venture. See page "F" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 8, to the plans and specifications for Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities and a total deduction of $61,021.97 to the contract with Kordick & Rados, A Joint Venture. See page "G" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 9, to the plans and specifications for Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8, granting an extension of time of 78 calendar days to the contract with Kordick & Rados, A Joint Venture. See page "H" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on Page 4) -3- ( 16) CONSENT CALENDAR ( Conti.nued) (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 73-3, accepting Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion upon receipt of letters of permit compliance from the Cities of Hunt1.o&ton_5e3cn H-- and Fountain Valley, and approving:final closeoutl ....................... -~agreement\ See page "I" (17) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any (17a) ALL DISTRICTS FILE ---· .. LElTER ... ---;7V\\ s A/C ••.• TKLR ·- (18) (19) FILE --- LETTER -(21) A/C •••. TKlR - ···-········--N\\CJ (22) FIL~. ·-V l(L!Tr!it~--~ \ 'Ale-:.'.TKLR -~ \ 'J ···-··-···---- (23) 'IL!_ 7 _?(ETTER~ A/C .... TKLR -,\J\ \ '\ ·····---···--··-·--- Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5(Revised) to the plans and specifications for Administration-Engineering Building Addition, Job No. J-7-2, authorizing an addition of $5,749.56 and granting an extension of time of 109 calendar days, to the contract with B. H. Miller Construction Company. See page "J" Consiae esolution No. 73-2, accepting Administration- Engineering Building b No. J-7-2, complete, authorizing execution of a nd approving final closeout agreement. "K" ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file certification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving warrant books for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing payment of claims listed. on page "A" · ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications, if any DISTRICTS 3, 5 & 11 Consideration of motion directing the staff to evaluate condition of Districts' trunk sewer manholes and to prepare recommendation for contractual repairs where deemed necessary DISTRICT l . Consideration of Resolution No. 73-4-1, authorizing execution of agreement with Hemisphere Constructors, Inc. regarding the effects of Proposition 20 (Coastal Zone Conservation Act) on the construction of Digesters "N" and "O" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-21, as recommended by the General Counsel. See page "M" DISTRICT 1 Consideration of Resolution No. 73-5-1, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Digesters "N" and "O" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-21, to Hemisphere Constructors, Inc. in the amount of $1,068,413.00 See pages "N'1 and no 11 (24) DISTRICTS 1 & q- -Consideration of motion a·pproving susp€-fl-&e---.f.'u11a---wa-P-rants) if any. See page ~G~- (25) DISTRICT l Cowsideration of motion approving warrants, if-ariy-. See pag' nB" -4- (26) (27) "· . ( 28) FILE~---~·-········- •emR ···-·-···- -.,,,,,,,,,t./C •••• TKLR --N\ \ ~ (29) I\\\~ (30) D!__STRIC~l Ot"tler buS'iness ~ comm~ations, if any DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn 3\35_ DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress report on construction of Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, From Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1. See page 11 P 11 DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any See page "B" DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications, if any -~-;-: DISTRICT 2 \ Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., January 17, iv\ -~ 1973 ~·.sl,., FILfJ.,~: '32) LETTER .. """"""' A/C •••. TKLR ...[\\ \ <) ···-·---··-···-··-··-c 3 3 ) ~\\~ (34) /\\ \, ~ DIS TRI CT 5 & 6 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress report on construction of Sewer Tru~k "B" -Unit 8, Pacific Coast Highway Force Main,Contract No. 5-19. See page 11 Q 11 DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants, if any. See page 11 B" DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page i: B 11 ( 35) "':QISTRiq1 5 ~her bliiiness an~ comrn~ations, if any (36) DISTRICT 5 ~\S Consideration of motion to adjourn g:38 ( 37 )-·DI-S-T-RTCT--6 Consideration of motion---a~ng-warrants-,-if any. S·ee page '1 C" (38~ DIS~ICT 6 ~"~ ~ ,~ Othe~~~siness~d communf'o-ations, if any (39) DISTRICT 6 Ml~ Consideration of motion to adjourn~:3~ \40) (41) DISTRICT 8 -~ ~~~ Consideration of~motion to receive and file annual report submitted by Hanson, Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester, Certified Public Accountants, for the year ending June 30, 1972, previously mailed to Directors by Auditors. DISTRICT 8 Other business and communications, if any (42) DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion to adjourn -5- (43) ff\\~ ( 44) M\~ (45) DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants, if any. See page "B" DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "C" EqSTRICT~l ~ . Otiier bliS'iness and\__communica~ons, if any ..._,, (46) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn cg,. 3 '1 FILEt> :e:::... ( 4 7) DISTRICT 7 LETIER -·---. Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress Ale .... TKLR -f\\\ S report on construction of West Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches ·-· 19, 20 and 22, Contract No. 7-5-lR. See page "R" ... / Ci~----Y-- LETTER _.- A/C •••• TKLR - ···-··-··-·--··--- ........................ - (48) (49) (50) MlS (51) ( 52) f'\\\S> DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 73-6-7, authorizing acceptance of"-.Diant of Easement from Irvine Industrial Complex, for perm~rieht ~~i~~ent in connection with Gisler Red Hill Trunk, Schedule B, Contract No. 7-1, in exchange for quitclaiming a portion of easement relative to abandoned section of Old Army Air Base line, at no cost to the District. See page "S" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution,No. 73-7-7, authorizing execution of Quitclaim Deed-to Irvine Industrial Complex for portion of easement relative to abandoned section of' Old Army Air Base trunk, in exchange for permanent easement in co~nection with Gisler Red Hill Trunk, Schedule B, Contract No. 7-1. See page "T" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion.approving warrants, if any. See page "C" DI'S_TRICT 7 ., otfi'(if busines-s__ and c-nicati~ if any DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn 8:39 (53) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of Resolution No. 73-8-3, authorizing fllE _ -acceptance of Corporation Grant Deed from W I R Developers, UTTER____.:. \ c Inc. re la ti ve to right of way for Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, :N\ ~ Contract No. 3-2, southerly of Bo ls a on the easterly side ~~~::'ri:: of the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way, at no cost -to the District, in exchange for quitclaiming a portion of easement relative to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-2. See page "U" ~. DISTRICT 3 fll! Consideration of Resolution. No. 73-9-3, authorizing ). 7 -:'·.' C u:TTER execution of an .agreeJiien..:L.witil ___ W_LJL_D_evalope.rs . .,_..-I-r1e-...., J · L A/C .•• :na.R -providing for paving of right of way received in fee, in ....... --exchange for quitclaiming a portion of easement re;l.ative ~ to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-2, at no (55) Fl\! -~ LETTER~ we ... :na.1 -IY) j ~ __ ................... ....-- .............................. - cost to the District. See page "vn DISTRICT 3 Consideration of Resolution No. 73-10-3, authorizing execution of a Quitclaim Deed to W I R Developers, Inc. for portion of existing District easement relative to the Mi:-er-Holder Trunk Sewer, rJntract No. 3-2. Se~ page "W" -6- ' ... lll!9d0) ! \,fTTER ·······-, A/C .. ·K•R ·-', \ \ '-) ... .- ·:flt£~' tETTE1l --- -.,,,.; A/C _ •• TK\.R - DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff progress report on construction of the Knott Inte~ceptor, a Portion of Reach 1, and Reaches 2 and 3, Contract No. 3-17. See page "X" DISTRICT 3 Further consideration of routing of Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18, through the City of Westminster, deferred from regular meeting of December 13, 1972. ==~·€ DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal Q.~ ·-submitted by Stone & Youngberg, Municipal Financing Consultants, (tiTIE!, ~·,.......-Inc., dated January 9, 1973, for financial consulting services ~ .. MR_ in connection with funding of District's Master Plan Trunk Sewer program, on a per diem fee basis for a total fee not ·····················-to exceed $4, 500. See page "Y" ................................... (59) {Y\ \ s ----~~- (61) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "B" --- DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn tJ 5° -7- Post Offic e Box 8127 MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Foun t ain' Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714 540-29 10 962-2411 January 5, 1 973 REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, J anuary 10, 1 973 7 :30 p.m . The following is a brief explanation of the more important non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory . Warrant lists are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but will appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting . Joint .Boards Nos . 9 and 12 -EXECUTIVE SESSION : The Boards will convene in Executive Session to consider personnel matters relative to rec ent 11meet -and -confer" discussions with representatives of the Employees ' Assoc i ati on . The Special Committee on Compensation for Department Heads has schedul ed a meeting for 5:30 p.m ., i mmediate l y preceding the Joint Board meeting . The Spec i al Committee may have a recommendation . Nos. 13 and 14 -REPORT OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND ACT I ONS ON COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATIONS : The Committee met on the evening of January 3 . A writt e n r eport of this meeting , together with the recommendat i ons to th e Joint Boar ds is enclosed for the Directors onl y . No . 16 -CONSENT CALENDAR : The following agenda items fall i n to this category in accorda nce wi th the definition established by the Boards: (a) Emergency Repairs to Plant No . 2 Boiler . A boiler which is used to heat the digesters at Pl ant No. 2 malfunctioned r equiring imm ediat e majo r r epairs . Th e motion appear- ing on the agenda rat ifies the General Manager 's action authorizing the emergency r epairs . , . (b) Sale of Scrap Metal . Bids are being received for the sale of approximately 122 tons of sal vaged scrap metal and non-ferrous metals . A bid tabulation and recommendat ion will be provided at Wednesday 's meeting . (c,d,e & f) Closeout of Job No . I -8 -Interplant I nfluent Interceptor . The actions ap pea r - ing on the agenda will close out this $6 .4 million project which has been successfully completed approximately 7 months ahead of schedule. Change Order No . 7 was requested by the Di stricts' Maintenance Department . A recent inspection of some existing aluminum slide gates revealed they were badly deteriorated . Therefore, the substitution of slide gates made of #316 stainless steel was recommended because the plans cal led for simi lar a l uminum gates . Change Order No . 8 is the customary final adjustment of the engineers' estimated quantities which, on this project deducts $61,021 .97 from the .contract price . Change Order No . 9 grants a total e xtens ion of time of 78 days to the contract . A copy of each change order is included with the agenda material . Resolution No . 73-3 accepts the project as compl e te and authorizes the filing of a Notic e of Completion and approves a Closeout Agreement to withhold funds from the contractor until the n ew s lide gates (Change Order No . 7) are installed . No . 17 -CLOSEOUT OF CONTRACT FOR ADMINISTRATION -ENGI NEER ING BUILDING ADD ITION, JOB NO . J-7-2 . (a) Included with the agenda material is Cha n ge Order No . 5 which details r ecent changes which were made during the course of the construction, totaling $5 ,749 .56 . -2 - (b) The construction contract for the Administration- Engineering Building Addition, Job No. J-7-2, has been essentially completed except for deficiencies which specifically involve the air conditioning and carpeting. We believe the air conditioning deficiencies can be corrected by the contractor. The staff's concern re- garding the carpeting has been discussed with the Districts' Building Committee; howeve r, an acceptable solution has not been presented by the contractor or the architect to date. It is the staff's suggestion that the contract be closed out on the condition that a Closeout Agreement be executed by the contractor withholding certain funds to cover the deficiencies. Discussions are being held with the contractor and the architect and a settlement may be proposed which is acceptable to the Building Committee. Districts Nos. 3, 5, and 11 No. 21 -DISTRICTS' TRUNK SEWER MANHOLES: Recent reports from the line-cleaning crews indicate that some manholes in Districts Nos. 3, 5, and 11 are in need of major repair. The deterioration is caused by the hydrogen sulfide attack on the concrete surfaces. It is the staff's recommendation that a s urv ey b e made by Districts ' fo rc es to estimate the manhole d e ficienci es and costs to repair same by contract . District No . 1 Nos. 22 and 23 -AWARD OF JOB NO . P2 -2 1, DIGESTERS 11 N11 AND 11 0 11 AT PLANT NO . 2: On advice of Counsel, the District did not award this contract at the last Joint meeting because of the unknown e ffects of the Coastal Zone Conservation Act (Proposition 20). A written agreement with the contractor, which protects the District in the event work is stopped by the Coastal Zone Commission, has b een concluded and it is now recomm e nded that the contract award be made . The actions appearing on the agenda are in accordance with the General Counsel's recommendations. All Districts Nos. 28, 3~ 47 and 5S -PROGRESS REPORTS ON INTERCEPTOR SEWER CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE DISTRICTS : I n an effort to keep the Directors informed of the progress of the various Di stricts ' construction projects, a brief report of each proj e ct is enclosed. District No . 8 No. 40 -ANNUAL AUDIT REPORT -The only item of business for the District for this quarter is the approval and acceptance of the annual audit report for the year ending June 30 , 1 972 , which has been prepared by Hanson, Pete r son, Cow l es, and Sylvester, Certified Public Accountants . -3 - District No . 7 Nos. 41 and 49 -TRADING SEWER EASE.MENTS: The actions appearing on the agenda authorize acceptance of a sewer easement from the Irvine Industrial Complex in exchange for the execution of a District Quitc laim Deed to the Complex for a portion of an easement for a sewer line which once served the Orange County Airport. It is recom- mended that these actions be approved . District No. 3 Nos. 53 through 55 -MILLER -HOLDER TRUNK SEWER EASEMENT ADJUST.MENT: Currently, District No . 3 has a 30-foot uti lity easement fo r the Mi l ler-Holder Trunk, Contract No . 3-2, southerly:of Bolsa on the easterly side of the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way in the City of Westminster . The property owner now desires to develop the property and has proposed that in exchange for the District quitclaiming a 10-foot portion of the easement, he will dedicate the re- mainin g 20 feet of the right of way to the District in fee and pave the right of way for the District at no cos t. Construction of the Knott Interceptor precludes t he need for futur e additional construction in this 30-foot right of way; therefo re, the 20-foot right of way is adequate and the paving wi ll insur e continued access with minimum maintenance . No. 57 -FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF ROUTING OF KNOTT INTERCEPI'OR THROUGH CITY OF WESTMINSTER: We expec t a progress report on the acquisition of the right of way from the City of Westminster by the time of the meeting on January 10. We understand that . the City's staff is in contact with the property owners relative to the alternate alignment which was proposed by Director McWhinney. No. 58 -PROPOSAL OF FINANCING CONSULTANT: The staff will have a proposal from a r esponsible financing consulting f irm for the Boa rd's con sideration as directed . -4- January 10, 1973 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN: Discussion of the 1972 County Grand Jury Report regarding Orange County Sanitation Districts, (excerpt in Directors' folders). Appoint a committee of past joint chairmen to make recommendations relative to the Directors' fee schedule based on the passage of Assembly Bill 2146. (Past Joint Chairmen, Clifton Miller, Ed Just, and Norman Culver). Telephone call to Paul G. Brovm, retired Assistant General Manager and Chief Engineer. (Wife's name, Frances). Call the Executiv_e_Co.rnpi;_---itt~or-!J2e 5:30 meeting of January 30th. Invite Directors:,___Rogers'an~vens or Directors Root and~ Stephenson to attend-and partic-:lpate in the discussion. ~-""'Q--~c...-,3 REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER: The calendar year started out well for us. So C. won in the Rose Bowl. We received $537,000, which is the initial payment for the Irvine Ranch Water District on capacity rights in the Districts' ocean outfall system. We "won one" at a State Board meeting on January 4th. (Report on the upcoming CASA meeting of February 2nd and 3rd in San Diego. Copies of tentative meeting are in the Directors' folders.) Progress reports on the District work with particular emphasis on some of the problems in District No. 3 pertaining to the contractor's construction at the Flood Control Channels. Comment on the retiring County Treasurer. Suggest a resolution of appreciation fr·om the Board to him. Credit should be given for his action in the early days of investing surplus funds. With his assistance, we set up our investment program. Ro..t)c~\-c. '13-12. Federal definition of secondary treatment. I contacted representa- tives in Washington, D.C. today, and it appears there will be two definitions. Although I do not have the details, it does recognize the existing facilities and what that really means in our particular case, I do not know. There is not anything available on it at the moment. It has not been published in the Federal Register. In fact, it looks like the end of this month now before it will actually be published. Agenda I tern No. . (o ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS The Grand Jury worked actively for passage of Assembly Bill No. 2146, which was 1972 legislation to limit Sanitation District Directors' fees for attending concurrent meetings of more than one Dis- trict Board. The Jury issued a press release stating the need for such enabling State legislation, wrote letters of support to State legislators, and requested support from the County Legislative Planning Cormnittee. A. B. 2146 passed the Legislature and was signed by the Governor. This enabling legislation will become effec- tive 60 days after adjournment of the 1972 Legislature, and at that time the joint board of the Sanitation Dis- tricts must itself vote to eliminate multiple fees for its Directors who are representing more than one Dis- trict. Until the local Board votes, the change in Directors' fees cannot be effected. In assessing a more basic improvement in the oper- ation of the Sanitation Districts, the Jury feels that the present 7 Sanitation Boards, which consist of 38 Directors, could well be consolidated into one Board composed of from 5 to 10 members. The present large policy-making board is excessive and very costly to the taxpayer. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That the joint board of the County Sanitation Districts implement provisions of Assembly Bill No. 2146 in March 197 3. 2. That the 7 Sanitation District Boards be con- solidated into one Beard with 5 to 10 members. 19 Agenda Item No. I /(D) RESOLUTION NO. 73-1 ADJUSTING SALATIIES FOR CERTAIN CLASSIFICATIONS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 71-3, AS AMENDED, ADJUSTING SALARIES FOR CERTAIN CLASSIFICATIONS * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Section 2, Sub-sections A and B, of Resolution No. 71-3, as amended, is hereby further amended to adjust the salary ranges for the following position classifications of the Joint Administrative Organization; salaries for which are hereby established for said classifications as follows: Position Classification Principal Engineering Aide Junior Engineer Electrical Foreman Engineering Representative Instrumentation Foreman Construction Inspector Shift Supervisor Collection Facilities Foreman Electrical Technician II t::nstrumentation ~1 echnician II Associate Engineering Aide Mechanical Foreman Plant Operator IV Engineering Aide III A. OPERATIONAL PERSONNEL Effective 12-1-72 Range No. 52A 52 51A 51A 51A 50C 50A 50 49C 49C 49B 49B 49A 49A Salary $953/1187 940/1170 902/1122 902/1122 902/1122 877/1092 854/1062 842/1048 830/1034 830/1034 819/1020 819/1020 808/1006 808/1006 Effective 7-1-73 Range No. 51B 51B 50B 50 50 49B Salary $914/1138 914/1138 865/1077 -842/1048 842/1048 819/1020 Position Classification Senior Laboratory and Research Analyst Assistant Construction Tnspector ~ Groundskeeping Foreman Plant Maintenance Foreman Plant Operator III Mechar-iic II Pump Station Mechanic II Welder Electrical Technician I Instrumentation Technician I Trunk Maintenance Foreman Painter Maintenance Mechanic II "'-f:ngineering Aide II Laboratory Analyst II Plant Operator II Mechanic I Pump Station Mechanic I Trunk Maintenance Man II Electrical Maintenance Man Laboratory Analyst I Maintenance Mechanic I Engineering Aide I Plant Operator I Senior Groundskeeper ~aboratory Technician ~ Mechanical Maintenance Man Pump Station Maintenance Man Groundskeeper II Heavy Equipment Operator I Effective 12-1-72 Range No. 49 48C 48C 48C 48A 48 48 48 47C 47C 47C 47B 47A 47A 47 46A 46 46 45C 45C 45B 45A 45A 44C 44C 44 44 44 43C 43C Salary $797/992 786/979 786/979 786/979 766/953 755/940 755/940 755/940 745/927 745/927 745/927 735/914 725/902 725/902 715/889 686/854 667/842 667/842 668/830 668/830 659/819 650/808 650/808 632/786 632/786 608/755 608/755 608/755 600/745 600/745 -2- Effective 7-1-73 Range No. 49A 49 49 48B 48 48 48 47C 47B 47A 46B 46 46 45C 45B 45 45 44A 44 44 Salary $808/1006 797/992 797/992 776/966 755/940 755/940 755/940 745/927 735/914 725/902 696/865 677/842 677/842 668/830 659/819 641/797 641/797 616/766 608/755 608/755 Effective Effective 12-1-72 7-1-73 Range Range Position Classification No. Salary No. Salary Maintenance Man 43C $600/745 44 $608/755 Trunk Maintenance Man I 43C 600/745 44 608/755 rrtilityman -Electrical 43A 583/725 43B 591/735 ~ Utilityman -Mechanical 43 575/?15 Groundskeeper I 42C 568/706 43 575/715 Utilityman -Collection Facilities 42C 568/706 43 575/715 Utilityman -Maintenance 42C 568/706 43 575/715 Utilityman -Operations 42C 568/706 43 575/715 Construction Inspector ·(Part-time) $7.00/Hr. Max Student Helper (Part-time) $2.45/Hr. Max B. APPRENTICESHIP PERSONNEL Apprentice II -Electrical 45C 668/830 46 677/842 Apprentice II -Laboratory 45B 659/819 45C 668/830 ~prentice II -Engineering 45A 650/808 Apprentice II -Operations 44C 632/786 45 641/797 Apprentice II -Mechanical 44 608/755 Apprentice II -Maintenance 43C 600/745 44 608/755 Apprentice I 41 576/641 Section 2. That Section 19 of Resolution No .. 71-3, as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows: "Section 19. No management or supervisory employee who occupies a position that has a salary range exceeding that of Range No. 52A as hereinabove established, will be compensated under the provisions of Section 16, 17 and 18 of this resolu- tion." Section 3. That Section 13 of Resolution No. 71-3, as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows: "Section 13. If, in the determination of the General Manager, work of a higher paid classification is required -3- by a Department Head or Departmental Supervisor of an employee on a temporary baGis for a period of more than twenty-one (21) consecutive working days in a payroll year, the employee working temporarily in said higher classifi- cation shall be eligible to receive a temporary increase in pay rate for time worked in the higher paid classification beginning. with the 22nd consecutive working day, provided (a) that it is established by the Department Head that said employee is, in fact, performing in the capacity of the higher position; (b) that the higher position classification is vacant by virtue of the incumbent having been promoted, terminated, or being on an extended leave; and (c) that written notification of the required work of a higher paid classification has been properly filed with the Department Head within the first ten (10) consecutive days of said work . . The increased compensation to be paid tq an employee who meets the aforementioned criteria shall be equal to a one full step salary increase or the first step of the position classification for which said work is allegedly being performed, whichever is greater, provided that only the percentage of time actually devoted to performing work of the higher classification commencing with the 22nd consecutive work day shall be compensated at the higher rate of pay. When an employee is requested by the Department Head to work in an upgraded classifica~ion wherein it is the intent to permanently upgrade said employee in that classification, the twenty-one (21) consecutive working day waiting period for temporary increase in pay rate eligibility, as hereinabove provided, may be waived by the General Manager." Section 4. That Section 17 of Resolution No. 71-3, as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows: "Section 17. Personnel designated as shift employees, as provided in Section 3 of Resolution No. 70-3, who are required to work on shifts other than the regular daytime shift shall receive -4- shift differential pay as follows: 4:00 p.m. to Midnight Shift The flat sum of $2.25 for each shift of seven or more hours worked after 4:00 p.m. and before midnight; or, The flat sum of $1.13 for each shift of four or more hours, but less than seven hours, worked after 4:00 p.m. and before midnight. Midnight to 8:00 a.m. Shift The flat sum of $2.75 for each shift of seven or more hours worked after midnight and before 8:00 a.m.; or, The flat sum of $1.38 for each shift of four or more hours, but less than seven hours, worked after midnight and before 8:00 a.m. Said sums shall be in addition to the employee's regular salary and shall be paid quarterly. Said compensation is separate and apart from overtime pay provided herein and any employee not designated as entitled to shift differential pay shall receive compensation for overtime as provided herein." Section 5. That Section 15 of Resolution No. 70-3 is hereby .amended by the addition thereto of the following: ''Section 15a. Upon separation by reason of death or retirement, an employee shall be· entitled to receive 25% of this unused accumulated sick leave. Said payment shall be at the rate of pay in effect at the time of separation." Section 6. That an increase of $3,000.00 in employee Life Insurance and Accidental Death and Dismemberment Insurance is hereby authorized effective January 1, 1973. Section 7. That any other resolutions or motions or portions thereof that conflict herewith are hereby repealed and made of no further effect. Section 8. Except as provided in Section 6, this resolution shall become effective December 1, 1972. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held January 10, 1973. -5- -.. RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS January 10, 1973 at 7:30 p.m. WARRAN':i' NO. . 19430 19431 19432 ,....,433 __,..434 19435 19436 19437 19438 19439 19440 19441 19442 19443 19444 19445 19446 19447 19448 19li-49 191.t 50 19451 19452 19453 19454 19455 19~·56 19457 } ()458 ~59 19460 191~61 19462 19463 1911-64 19465 19~-66 19467 19l-t68 19~·69 19470 19ll71 19472 19473 19L174 19475 19476 19477 19478 19479 19480 19481 19482 1q483 '+84 ~485 19486 19487 19488 19489 19490 19491 19492 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings & Engine Parts $ American Compressor, Compressor Parts City of Anaheim, Power Anaheim Spring, Springs The Anchor Packing Co., Pump Packing & Gaskets Apco Supply, Electric Supplies Appliance Refinishing Co., Refinishing Azusa Western, Inc., Concrete Barnes Delaney, Chain Bell Pipe & Supply Co., Valves Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator RepRir James Benzie, Employee Mileage Black & Decker Mfg. Co., Tools Blower Paper Co., Maintenance Supplies Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams C & R Reconditioning Co., Compressor & Engine Repair Cal-State Seal Co., Gasket Material California Woodworking Machinery Co., Tools Castle Controls, Inc., Valves College Lumber Company, Inc., Building Materials Concrete Coring Co$, Coring Consolidated Electrical Distr~, Electric Supplies Constructors Supply Co., Hardware & Building Materials Paul A. Cooper, Grit Removal Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Truck Parts Costa Mesa County Water District, Water for Sewer Cleaning Alfred B. Costello, Steel Mr. Crane, Crane Rental Clarence S. Cummjngs, Employee Mileage Daily Pilot, Scrap Sale Notice De Guelle & Son's, Glass, Engine Repair & Hardware Marvin D. Derfler, Sump Pumps De Mars Co., Electric Supplies Dominguez Marine & Industrial Su~ply Co., Valves Dow Chemical, li.S.A~, Chemj_cals {MO 7-12-72) Ducommun Metals & Supply Co., Steel Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies & Forms . Electric Supplies Distributing, Electric Supplies Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring (MO 12-14-66) Enterprise Printing Coo, Printing Supplies Envirotech Corpe, Clarifie~ Parts Fairfax Electronics, Inc., Communication Equipment Fischer & Porter Co., Magneto Repair Fletcher Jones Chevrolet, Truck Parts Fowler Equipment, Inc., Equipment Rental William Ho Fox, Employee Mileage France Products Div., Engine Parts Freeway Machine & Welding Shop~ Machining Garden Grove Lumber & Cement, Building Materials General Electric Suppllf Coo, Electric Supplies General Telephone Co. (2 months) Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine W.W. Grainger, Inc., Electric Supplies Graybar Electric Co., Electric Supplies Hadley's Printing, Printing George To Hall, Inc., Controls Charles Go Hardy, Inc., Building Materials Harrington Industrial Plastics, Pipe Supplies w.c. Hendrie & Company, Inc., Pipe Supplies Honeywell, Inc., Controls Howard Supply Coo, Pipe Supplies & Valves City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington beach Equipment Rentals, 3prayer & Roller Rental A-1 AMOUN 1.r 1,011 .. 61 203.23 1:3 .. 45 36.23 84.32 193.27 63.00 702.66 118.13 53.55 26.00 24 .. 30 16.28 58.21 25.00 95.00 98.81 21.46 171.22 169.80 370.00 616 .. 58 544.47 816.00 312.21 125.94 80.85 626.00 36. '(8 6~00 55.84 '541"80 . 49. 56 1, 1+26. 40 2,362.50 86034 287.lJ 294 "·79 2,400000 103.69 398048 132048 55050 33.32 273.50 13050 472050 816.42 610.79 773.76 4,105.19 1, Ol+8 .85 181.28 194025 27.83 327054 101.30 1,533.49 33.65 486. 50 2,222010 20.06 159. 50 /ARRANT NO. 19493 19494 19495 19496 19497 10498 1 99 1~00 19501 19502 19503 19504 19505 19506 19507 19508 19509 19510 19511 19512 19513 19514 19515 19516 19517 19518 19519 19520 19521 19522 10523 J .21i 1~25 19526 19527 19528 19529 19530 19531 19532 19533 19534 19535 19536 19537 19538 19539 19540 19541 19542 19543 19544 19545 19546 19547 19548 ~ >49 ~50 19551 19552 19553 19554 19555 19556 19557 IN FAVOR OF Industrial Water Conditioning, Lab Water $ Instructional Materials & Equipment Distr., Hardware International Harvester Co., Truck Parts J & M Service, Equipment Repair Kar Products, Inc., Electric Supplies Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies Kelco Sales & Engineering Co., Equipment Repair Kelly Pipe Company, Pipe Supplies King Bearing, Inc., Couplings, V-Belts & Bearings Kleen Line Corp., Mtce. & Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware Kontes or California, Lab Supplies LBWS, Inc., Tools, Hardware & Welding Supplies L & N Unirorrn Supply Co., Uniform Rental LACCO, Chemicals Judy Lee, Employee Mileage Lewis Bros. Battery, Batteries Charles Lowe Company, Pump Parts R.W. Mc Clellan & Sons, Inc., Paving Materials John H. Mc Cullough, Employee Mileage Mesa Supply, Truck Parts Mine Safety Appliances Co., Mtce. Supplies N.C.R., Mtce. Agreement 1973 National Chemsearch Corp., Cleaners National Lumber & Supply Co., Building Materlals Nelson Dunn, Inc., Generator Parts City of Newport Beach, Water Newport Stationers, Office Supplies c. Arthur Nissan, Gen'l. Counsel Retainer, Legal Services Orange County Chemical Coo, Chemicals Orange County Radiotelephone Orange County Stamp Coo, Rubber Stamps Orange County Water District, Water Repleriishment Tax Orange Valve & Fitting Co., -Piping Supplies Pacific Telephone Co., Gregg T. Pamson, Employee Mileage Perkin~Elmer Corp., Lab Supplies Porter Boiler Service, BoiJ.er·. Repair&_ Parts (MO 7-12-72) Postmaster, Postage Lee Potter Company, Inc., Freight Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal Roseburrough Tool, Inc., Tools Jack H. Ross, Employee Mileage Routh Transportation, Oil Removal Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Rewind & Repair Santa Ana Tent & Awning Co., Hardware Scientific Products, Lab Supplies Scott Refrigeration Service, Inc., Air Conditioning Repair Scranton Gillette Publishers, Technical Journal Seal Black, Inc., Paving Materials The Sherwin Williams Coo, Paint Supplies Signal Flash Co., Inco, Barricade Rental Southern California Chemical, Chemicals Southern California Edison Co. Southern California Gas Co. Southern California Water Co. Southwest Processors, Oil Spill Removal Sparkletts Drinking Water, Bottled Water Speed-E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline Dutch Stark Company, Electric Cart Parts Starow Steel, Steel State Compensation Insurance Fund, r-remium A-2 AMOUNT 40.00 80.27 97.81 38.64 134.69 87013 72.52 242.66 97.07 197.58 91.86 58.56 331.84 2,029.25 36030 23.10 193.87 116.13 236 025 127.02 105.00 27.93 1,207.50 376.16 163.95 117.67 189.03 92.80 1,723.75 13.66 74.19 10.09 342.50 .32.82 39.1. 35 26.58 42000 5,295,,47 350000 9o30 h9.02 182.00 128074 22.98 283~50 10.24 . 525 090 . 37 .Bo 144.98 892050 15000 14044 464.71 19026 266.00 15,840018 2,279.78 3o00 1,484.30 50.73 149.46 636.63 80.15 489 .61.+ 11~, 000. 00 '1AR1lANT NO. 19558 19559 19560 19561 19562 1°'S63 ~64 19565 19566 19567 19568 19569 19570 19571 19572 19573 19574 19575 19576 19577 19578 1°579 ~o 19581 19582 19583 19584 19585 19586 19587 19588 29589 19590 19591 19592 IN FAVOR OF Stonehouse Signs, Inc., Signs Sully Miller Contracting Co., Paving Materials J. Wayne Sylvester, Employee Mileage T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Parts Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage c.o. Thompson Petroleum Coo, Kerosene Tony's Lock & Safe Service, Hardware Union Oil Company of Calif., Gasoline U.S. Equipment Co., Inc., Compressor & Engine Parts United States Helium, Lab Supplies Utilities Supply Co., Tools John R. Waples, R.s., Odor Consultant Western Salt Co., Salt Russ Wold, Employee Mileage World Travel Bureau, Inc., Meeting Travel Expense Worthington Service Corp~, Compressor Parts Donald James Wright, Employee Mileage Xerox Corp., Reproduction Service Everett H. York Com:_Jany, Filters Fred A. Harper, Various Mtg. & COD Expense TOTAL JOINT OPERATING CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Bruning Division, Drafting Equipment Burroughs Corp., Office Equipment Carollo & Keith, Survey I-8 John Carollo Engineers, Engineering-Plant Constr. E.T.I. & Kordick, Contractor I-8-3 & P2-ll-l City of Fountain Valley, Street Striping I-8 AMOUNT 12.54 60.68 24.oo 12041 3Li .65 137.88 6.30 65.01 679.67 245096 llol2 214080 74056 84.36 120.20 33.05 64.62 840.00 90072 123.47 84,281.42 James E. Hoagland Co. & Hoagland Engr. Co., Contr. Pl-9-1 Kordick & Rados, Contractor I-8 1,024.80 847.35 1,015.00 66,566.62 177,534.25 174.28 53,784.00 ll,780.00 200.12 5, 17.4.61 975.00 1,521055 209.60 538.89 10,998000 Mid West Instrument, Test Equipment B.H. Miller Construction Co., Contractor J-7-2 Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Testing I-8-3 Sirco Controls Company, Test Equipment Twining Laboratories, Testing I-8 & J-7-2 Utilities Supply Company, Tools F.T. Ziebarth Co. & Ziebarth & Alper, Contractor J-4-1 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF A-3 $ 332,344.07 $ 416,625.49 DISTRICT NO. 2 WARHANT NO. ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 19593 19594 19595 19596 19597 19598 19599 19600 19601 19602 19603 19604 Lowry & Associates, Constructjon Survey 2-14-1 & Engr. Service 2-14-2, 2-15, 2-16, 2-17 & 2-18 Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Pipe Testing 2-14-1 Sully Miller Contracting Co., Contractor 2-14-1 DISTRICT NOo 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engr. Service -Connection Fee Study ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering. Construction Survey 3-17 & Engr. Service 3-18 Moore & Taber, Soil Test 3-18 DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 SUSPENSE FUND WARPJ'i.NTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Construction Survey 3-17 City of Fountain Valley, Traffic Control 3-17 Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Pipe Testing 3-17 J. F. Shea Co., Inc., Contractor 3-17 Twining Laboratories, Testing 3-17 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF City of Newport Beach, Connection Fee Collection DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Osborne Laboratories. Pipe Testing 5-19 ~ Shuirman-Simpson, Engineering Service 5-19 A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. & N. M. Saliba Co., Contr. 5-19 ( B) $ AMOUNT 9,215.25 1,675.00 169,383.60 $ 180,273.85 $ $ 6,561.00 3,500.00 $ 10,061.00 $ ll,608.50 $ 180. 75 457.60 2,037.50 464,517.00 13.90 $ 467,206.75 $ $ 4,088.08 525.00 8,765.00 120,270.15 $ 129,560.15 DISTRICT NO. 7 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 19608 Bo-Mar Construction Company, Contr. 7-5-lR 19609 Boyle Engineerin~, Design Survey 7-5-lR & Engr~ 7-2C-2 & 7-2D-b 19610 19611 1 12 ~ Irvine Industrial Complex, Annual Reimb. Agrmt. Jennings, Halderman-Hood, Reimb. Agrmt. Payment Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Testing 7-5-lR DISTRICT NO. 11 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Service Payments $ AMOUNT 77,994.oo 708.00 110,794.10 3,141.00 37.50 $ 192,674.60 19613 City of Huntington Beach, Goldenwest Force Main Removal $ 4,981.00 (C) RESOLUTION NO. 73-11 FECEIVING FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT CONCERNING WASTE DISCHARGE, AND APPROVING SUBMISSION OF SAID REPORT TO REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11~ OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, TO RECEIVE AND FILE FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT REQUIRED BY THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD'S JULY 6, 1972 WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLAN FOR THE OCEAN WATERS OF CALIFORNIA; AND APPROVING SUBMISSION OF SAID REPORT TO THE CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, SANTA ANA REGION * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, on July 6, 1972 the State Water Resources Control Board adopted a Water Quality Control Plan for the Ocean Waters of California pursuant to the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act of 1969; and, WHEREAS, said control plan requires submission by each waste discharger by January 15, 1973, of a comprehensive technical report concerning the waste discharge; and, WHEREAS, the State Water Resources Control Board has issued guidelines dated October 6, 1972 for preparation and submission of said technical report; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Dii-iectors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 have heretofore authorized and directed preparation of said technical report to comply with the State Water Resources Control Board's Water Quality Control Plan for the Ocean Waters of California; and, WHEREAS, John Carollo Engineers, in cooperation with the Districts' staff, has prepared said final technical report for submission to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: Section 1. That the technical report on waste discharges to the ocean and for monitoring the affects of waste discharges on the ocean, is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That submission of said report to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana hegion, is hereby approved. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held January 10, 1973. Agenda Item #15 -D-All Districts ~ B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N Date: January 5, 1973 Contract for: 1. 2. 3. SALE OF SCRAP METAL SPECIFICATION NO. S-009 BIDDER Steverson Bros. P. o. Box 335 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Key Metals, Inc 702 E. Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 92701 Submarine Engineering Associates 512 -31st Street Newport Beach, CA 92660 FERROUS METAL -TON $18.00 (a) 11.25 1. 00 NON-FERROUS METAL -LB. $0.12 0.2051 0.05 Specifications were also sent to the following firms: Anaheim Fullerton Scrap Iron & Metal, 131 W. Commercial, Anaheim Industrial Surplus & Supply, 1680 Superior, Costa Mesa A & M Metal Salvage Co., 2323 W. 5th Street, Santa Ana Gordon Lowry, 1919 -17th Street, Huntington Beach Hickson & Newell, 3117 W. 5th Street Santa Ana Rain Bow Disposal, P. 0. Box 1026, Huntington Beach * * * * * * * * * It is recommended that award for Ferrous Metal(a) be made to Steverson Bros., P. O. Box 335, Huntington Beach, the highest and best bidder, and for Non-Ferrous Metal(b) be made to Key Metals, Inc., 702 E. Fruit Street, Santa Ana, the highest and best bidder. J. Wayne Sylvester Director of Finance (b) Agenda Item #16(b) -E-All Districts cou:~·i'Y S:\:; I "L\T l er: DI ST!~ l crs C'F U.·: .. \::GE cc:1::r1 P. 0. l~o x 3127 -1G0 .i .; E 11 is :\ v c nu e Fountain Valley, Cal ifor;1ia Y2708 C ~ 0. l\O. 7 :o:,ffR:\CTO;~: KORDICK & RADOS, A Joint Venture DATE J __ a_n_u_a_r_y~r-o-, -.1-97 3 j Oil: INTERPLA~~T INFLUENT INTERCEPTOR, Job No. I-8 ·~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--~~- Ar,10un t of this Ch~ag c Order (ADD) ~r:tNNNt\I~ $ 6,780.00 '-"" In accor'dancc with contract provisions, the f o 11 owing chang cs in the : on tr a c t an cl Io r cont r a c t work arc her ch y author i z c cl and a s co ::1 pen s at ion ~hcrcfor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are lCrcby approved. . .. Reference: Armco letter to Contractor dated December 19, 1972 ADD The Contractor is directed to procure and install two 4 8 "x 9 6" s 1 id e g at cs of· 31 6 s ta in 1 e s s s ,tee 1 , incl~ding gate frames and slides, in lieu of the aluminum gates called for on the contract plans at the transition structure, Station 1+74f. All work will be done in accordance with the plans and specifications in regard to the methods of installation. There will be no additional compensation for installation. ADD TOTAL ADD Original Contract Price 6,780.00 $6,780.00 $ 6,387,511.00 Prev •. Au th. Chanr.cs CO' s 2 $ __ ~8_7~,_;;;.3...;..7..;;.3 ........... o ...... 1 __ _ Board authorization date: ~anuary 10, 1973 CAROLLO & KEITH Agenda Item #16(c) 3, \~ s, & 6 Tlns hanr,c (ADD) (~Xx1XI~ $ ____ 6..-&,_7_s_o~._o_o __ Ancndcd Contract Price S~481,664.0l -F- Approved: CCU:\TY S.\~:ITATIO?~ DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By ___ _ ~ORDICK & RAros, A Joint Venture By All Districts cou ;.;·r:y s_:,: ~ l T :-.T 1 c·~ ~ ! ~ 1 ST;~ I Cl:-) Gr= 0 i·~\.': c;: ~ c uu: ;ry P • O • 1 ~ox ~a 2 7 - 1 c o . ~ ,: E 11 i s :\ v c r 1 u e Fountain Valley, California ~2708 c. 0. 1\(J. 8 m.:T P .. A c T 0 R: K mm I c K & RA DO s ' A J 0 int v c n tu re ----,..--·-----DATE January 10, ·1973 OB: Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8 Amount of this Change Order Q\i~~ (DEDUCT) $ 61,0Zl.97 ....,_, In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the .ontract and/or contract work arc hereby authorized ~nd as conpcnsation hcrcfor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are lereby a pp roved. . ADJUST:·.fENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES Schedule I ADD --rtem Change Est'd Qtys No. Unit From To Change Unit Price 3 16 17 DEDUCT .._.,. 4 s 15 L.F. S.F. L.F. L. F·. L.F. S.F. Schedule II ADD 2 L.F. DEDUCT 20,398 19,000 700 . 132 290 7,400 87 r L.F.. 5,250 Board authorization date: . .._.,..1nua ry 10, ,197 3 20,480.12 21,643 1'4 o.o 90 140 4,500 137.50 5,194.03 CAROLLO & KEITH By ------------ Agenda Item #16(d) 82.12 2,643 700 2 2 7 ... 0 0 I L • F • 1.20/S.F. 3.00/L.F. ADD Schedule I $ 42 65.00/L.F. 150 550.00/L.F. 2,900 0.50/S.F. DEDUCT Scliedule I $ TOTAL DEDUCT Schedule I SO.SO 300.00/L.F. ADD Sche<luleII $ 55.97 239.50/L.F. DEDUCT SchedulcII TOTAL ADD Schedule!! TOTAL DEDUCT tOR CONTRACT Original Contract Price $ Prcv ... Au th. Changes $ 2,3,4-Part 1,5,6,7 This Change (XNN) (DEDUCT) $ Amended Contract Price s Approved: 18,641.24 3,171.60 2,100~00 23,912.84 2,730.00 82.:500.00 1,450.00 86,680.00 62,767.16 15,150.00 15,150.00 13,404.81 13,404.81 1'74.5 .19 o I, u 21.-9 7 6,387,511.00 142,603.01 61,021,97 6,469,092.04 COU:\TY SA~~ITATIO?~ DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By ---------rinr--c_p_u~t-y---c'<"'l'1-u.-l!-.. ~r-:_r...-.: i-1-;; ...-.l-n-~ ; __ : :: .K01WICK ft RADOS, A Joint Venture -G-All Districts COUZITY S:\~;IL\TIO:~ DIST~ICTS OF O?.J\~~G[ cou::TY P. 0. Box 3127 -108~4 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER r..o. NO. 9 :ONTRACTOR: KORDICK & RADOS, A Joint Venture ----------DATE January 10, 1973 JOB: INTERPLANT INFLUENT INTERCEPTOR, Job No. I-8 Reference: Change Orders Nos. 2, 5 and 6 ~he Contractor is hereby granted an extension of time to accomplish the extra work included in Change Orders Nos. 2, 5 and 6 For Change Order No. 2 . :Construction of 26-inch RCP Force ~Iain For Change Order No. 5 (2nd & 3r4 parts) Removal and relaying of four sections of 36-inch RCP Force Main and cleaning junction box For Change Order No. 6 (2nd part only) Construction of 48-inch RCP Manhole to accommodate District faciiities TOTAL rnrn EXTENSION FOR EXTRA WORK. The contractor is hereby granted an extension of time due to incleraent weather November. 14 -17 December · 4 -8 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION FOR INCLE,IENT WEATHER TOTAL TIME EXTENSION FOR SCHEDULE II SUMMARY OF CONTRACT THIE (Schedule II) Original Contract Date Original Contract Time (Schedule II) Original Completion Date (Schedule II) . Previous Time Extensions Time Extension This Change Order Total Extension of Contract Time (Schedule II) Rev1sed Contract Time Revised Completion Date 64-calendar.days 3 calendar days 2 calendar days 69 calendar days 4 calendar days S calendar days 9 calendar days 78 calendar days October 15, 1971 365 calendar days October 14, 1972 o calendar days 78 calendar days 78 calendar days ~43 calendar days December 31, 1972 . , . . \ Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes $ 6,387,511.00 $ 81,581 .04 Bo d authorization date: ~· January 10, 1973 CAROLLO & KEITH By -------------------------- Agenda Item #16(~) This Change (ADD)(DEDUCT) $ --------o.oo Amended Contract Price s 6,469,092.04 . -H- Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By ________ ~----~--~-:ool"'r-------.-~--~ Deputy Clne.t Eng1nee KCP.DICK & RADOS, A Joint ,/.;nture By--------------~-------------- All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 73-3 ACCEPTING JOB NO. I-8 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTi CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. I-8 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Kordick & Rados, a Joint Venture, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for the Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8, on the 31st day of December, 1972; and, Section 2. That by letter, Carollo and Keith, a Joint Venture, Districts' engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and Section 3. That the Deputy Chief Engineer of the Districts has concurred in said engineers' recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered ~iled; and, Section 4. That the Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated October 15, 1971, except as set forth in the Final Closeout Agreement with Kordick & Rados, a Joint Venture; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and: Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Kordick & Rados, a Joint Venture, providing for a ~etention of $7,500 from the final payment on said contract until delivery and installation of slide gates provided for in Change Order No. 7 have been completed, is hereby approved; and, Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent fbr Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6,.·7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held January 10, 1973. Agenda Item #16(f) -I-All Districts cou; ~TY S:\: ~I T/.T J (;~~ D 1 STi ~I CTS OF O!·~ \::GE c ou;:TY P. O. l~ox 3127 -lOd·l'i Ellis .\venue Fountain Valley, California ~2708 CllA~~GE OiUJi:R C.O. ~\C. 5 (ltEVISED) DATE January lo, 1973 :o:rrn.ACTOR: n. IL MILLER CONSTHUCTION cm.IPANY TOB :/\.dni11 is t ration-Eng inc er i 11g Bui ldin~ /\.<ld it ion, Job No. J-7-2 Aii1ount of this Change Order (ADD) (~~\~ $ 5,749.56 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the :.onl'tact and/or contract h'ork are hereby authorized and as conpensation ~hcrcfor, t}1c followinr; additions to or dc<luctions from the contract price are 1ercby approved. .. .. . ~ Reference: 12/19/72, 12/19/72, 11/30/72, 10/16/72, 10/10/72, 9/27/72, 9/19/72 District's 9/15/72, 9/12,72, 8/28/72, 8/21/72, 8/18/72, 8/9/72, 8/9/72, 8/1/72, Corres. 7/28/72, 7/19/72, 7/19/72, 7/18/72, 6/21/72, 6/6/72, 6/2/72 Contractor 12/12/72, 12/12/72, 10/10/72, 10/5/72, 9/25/72, 9/22,72, 9/21/72, Corres. 8/23/72, 7/27/72, 6/19/72, 3/6/72· Contractor 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 31, 32, 31, Estimates 29, 22, 20, 14 for c.o. ADD Extend 2 x 2 fencing at conference room patio Provide two additional flourescent light fixtures Type A/ 2 O 0 in Roor.1 E-9 Provide two additional Type K/100 fixtures in Room R-3 Provide ad<litional floor outlets Install panelling \:ith base at furred areas of Rooms R - 3 , R - 4 , R - 5 , I~ - 1 2 and R -14 Tint exterior windows for glare prevention Provide Type A movable partition and shelf" at Room E-12 Remove undisclosed existing electric floor boxes at Room R-13 Panel Room R-11 Provide two coats of paint at interior of Administration Building in lieu of the speci- fied one coat Provide panelling at Room R-1 Install 3-hour Fire Door at Room E-18 "-":hange locks and rekcy Administration Building as directed by the engineer · Install two additional free standing.shelving units ~love Door No. 34, add interior Hindow, and add slip channels at exterior mullions Install new raetal and glass fJoor No. 36 Agenda Item #17a J-1 ADD $ 281.75 ADD 200.80 ADD 167.44 ADD 950.21 ADD 464.97 ADD 420.90 ADD 310.79 ADD 125.76 ADD 135.70 ADD 371.86 ADD 146.35 ADD 474.95 ADD 242.08 ADD 246.33 ADD 295.28 ADD 346.15 All Districts cou:~TY SA: a T,\T j o:; DI STI! 1 CTS OF O?-,\~:GE cou:~TY P. O. Box 3127 -108~4 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHA~~GE OiWER C • 0 • l\ 0 • S (REV I S [ D ) :o:~TrJ\CTO:~: B. H. ~1 ILLER CO~JSTRUCT I ON CO:.tPANY DATE January 10, 1973 JOB: Administration-Engineering Building Addition, Job No. J-1-2· ! n1)_ (Continued) ~ Provide five additional lluilt-in credenza tops ADD $ 464.15 Under force accounts provide electrical service for floor boxes and time clocks ADD TOTAL ADD 449.09 S",094.56 DEDUCT Delete conversion of cabinets from three drawer to two drawer DEDUCT 345.00 EXTENSION OF CONTRACT THIE TOTAL DEDUCT $ 345.00 TOTAL ADD THIS CHANGE ORDER $5,749.56 Due to the above extra work the contractor is hereby granted an extension of contract :time of 109 calendar days ...__,.. Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension CO's Nos. 2, 3, 4 Time Extension this Change Order Total Extension of Contract Time Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date Board authorization date: ~...__,..uary 10, 1973 WILLIAM P. FICKER, A. I .A. ·. Agenda Item #17a October 15, 1971 210 calendar days May 12, 1972 164 calendar days 109 calendar days 273 calendar days 483 calendar days February 9, 1973 Original Contract Price $ 477,500.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 15,630.58 This Change (ADD) {(l!Rlltrn:-X): $ __ ._r; _, 7_4_9_._5_6 __ _ Amended Contract Price s 498,880.14 J-2 Approved: COU~TY SANITATIO~ DISTRICTS of Orani!e County, California By --~~~--~~1~1e~.1~n~1~t)~,----c-h~1-c_r__..L_n_~~i~1~1c~~ B. H. MILLER CONSTRUCTION Cff\fPANY All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 73~4-l AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH HEMISPHERE CONSTRUCTORS, INC. RE JOB NO. P2-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH HEMISPHERE CONSTRUCTORS, INC. REGARDING THE EFFECTS OF PROPOSITION 20 ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF DIGESTERS "N" AND "O" AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-21 * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated January 10, 1973, between County Sanitation District No. 1 and Hemisphere Constructors, Inc., recognizing the possibility of delay of work stoppage by reason of passage of Proposition 20, providing that the Districts should not be penalized in such an eventuality, and protecting the contractor from price changes if any should occur during work stoppages occasioned by the effect of the Proposition, as recommended by the General Counsel, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held January 10, 1973. Agenda Item #22 -M-District 1 RESOLUTION NO. 73-5-1 APPROVING AWARD OF JOB NO. P2-21, DIGESTERS "N" AND 11 0" AT PLANT NO. 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AWARD OF DIGESTERS "N" AND "O" AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-21 * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by John Carollo Engineers, Districts' engineers, and concurred in by the Deputy Chief Engineer, that award of ·contract be made to Hemisphere Constructors, Inc., for DIGESTERS "N" AND "O" AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-21, and the tabulation of bids and the proposal for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That award of contract to Hemispl1ere Constructors, Inc., in the total amount of $1,068,413.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, be approved; and, Section 3. That the contract date for said work be established as December 28, 1972; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor; and, Section 5. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held January 10, 1973. Agenda Item #23 -N-District 1 --.. -··-·~· ····-' \ Agenda Item No ___ _ Engineer's Estimate: $1,200,000. BID TABULATION SHEET Date November 20, 1972 Contract For: DIGESTEP.S "N" AND "O" AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-21 CONTRACTOR l. Hemisphere Constructors, Inc. · Bellflower 2. E.T.I. and Kordick, A Joint Venture Baldwin Park 3. James E. Hoagland co. Long Beach 4. J. Putnam Henck, a corporation and Henck Pro, a joint venture San Be)·nard:i.no 6. 8 . .. · 9. 10. Agenda Item #23 -0- TOTAL BID $1,068,413. .$1, 090' 000. . $1,091,220. $1,129,356. District 1 11:00 Al4 M E M 0 R A N D U M COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 January S, 1973 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Deputy Chief Engineer SUBJECT: Santa Ana River Interceptor -Contract No. 2-14-1 Work on this project has progressed from just north of Seventeenth Street in Santa Ana along the Flood Control District levee, through the golf course, to approximately 2,400 feet from the point of beginning. Due to the Contractor placing pipe at a greater rate than anticipated, and the problems of the pipe supplier Lleeting its commitments due to inclement weather, the Contractor was forced to shut down for the first two weeks of December so that the pipe supplier could increase its pipe supply. It is doubtful that the Contractor will be able to maintain 11is schedule for completing his work in the golf course for this reason. Tree transplanting, landscaping and backfilling and clean-up are being conducted very satisfactorily. The consultant (Lowry and Associates) for this project is very pleased at how well this work is progressing. The tunnel under Seventeenth Street is underway and should be complete some- time during the week of January 8, 1973. Work on the second heading will start at Plant No. 1 as soon as the pipe supplier has one hundred sections of pipe manu- factured. This should be by ~-larch 1, 1973. Discussions are scheduled with the City of Fountain Valley staff to coordinate the crossings of Warner and Talbert Avenues. REL:hjm Agenda Item #28 -P-District 2 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: M E M 0 R A N D U M COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 January 5, 1973 Fred A. Harper, General Manager Ray E. Lewis, Deputy Chief Engineer Sewer Trunk "B" -Unit 8 -Pacific Coast Highway Force ~·lain, Contract No. 5-19 Construction on this project has proceeded ~o approximately 200-fcet northwest of the offrar.lp of .Newport Boulevard \'lith the exception of the connection with .Bitter Point Pur.lp Station. A work stop-order was issued for two days, December 20 and 21, 1972, due to the non-compliance by the Contractor with the provisions of the Division of Highways Encroachment Permit. This matter was resolved and the Contractor has since conplied with all provisions of this permit. The road surface on the District's easement through the oil field is currently being restored. This is being done jointly by the Oil Company and the Contractor. The Contractor is currently restoring the drainage ditches adjacent to Pacific Coast llighway between Bitter Point Pump Station and Superior Avenue. Ground with a very high hydrogen sulphide content was encountered iri the Superior Avenue area, resulting in a very odorous nuisance. The crossing of Superior Avenue was r.1ade with a minimum of inconvenience to the public. On December 28, 1972, while drilling a dewatering well in the vicinity of Newport Boulevard, a 200 pair telephone cable was struck. This cable was correctly depicted on the plans, however, the Contractor failed to notify the telephone company prior to starting work in the area so that it could be properly located in the field. During the week of January 8, 1973, the Contractor is scheduled to remove the medians in Pacific Coast Highway and restripe the Highway from the Balboa Bay Club to Newport Boulevard. This will place all four lanes of traffic on the soutl1west side of the llighway so that work can proceed on the northeast side between these locations. There will be two lanes of traffic in each direction. Later on in January, work wili commence on the 24-inch VCP gravity sewer in the vicinity of Newport Boulevard. REL:hjm Agenda Item #32 -Q-Districts 5 & 6 M E M 0 R A N D U M COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (i 14) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 January 5, 1973 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Deputy Chief Engineer SUBJECT: West Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 19, 20 and 22 Contract No. 7-5-lR The Contractor is completing the installation of the 15-inch VCP sewer in Tustin Avenue. The Contractor has encountered difficulties on Fruit Street in trying to achieve the required compaction of the sub-base material. Prolonged delays and resurfacing of Fruit Street were the result of the inability to acl1ieve the relative compaction. On January S, 1973, the Contractor commenced construction at the intersection of Edinger and Red Hill. Sewage flows have been diverted to accommodate the Contractor's tie-in with the existing manhole. Contractor will proceed westerly in Edinger to Trotter Street on the west side of Lorenzo's Restaurant. Construction time on Edinger is estimated to be thirty working days. Contractor has completed approximately forty percent of the contract and is approximately two weeks behind in his normal work schedule. REL:hjm Agenda Item #47 -R-District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 73-6-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX HE CONTRACT 7-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX RE RED HILL GISLER TRUNK, SCHEDULE B, CONTRACT NO. 7-1 * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain Grant of Easement dated wherein an easement for sanitary sewer purposes is granted to County Sanitation District No. 7, is hereby accepted from Irvine Industrial Complex; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said easement is granted in connection with Gisler Red Hill Trunk, Schedule B, Contract No. 7-1, in exchange for quitclaiming a portion of easement relative to an abandoned section of Old Army Air Base line; and, Section 4. That said easement is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held January 10, 1973. Agenda Item #48 -S-District 7 .- RESOLUTION NO. 73-7-7 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF QUITCLAIM DEED TO IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX RE CONTRACT 7-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A QUITCLAIM DEED TO IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX RE GISLER RED HILL TRUNK, SCHEDULE B, CONTRACT NO. 7-1 * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Quitclaim Deed dated from County Sanitation District No. 7 to Irvine Industrial Complex be approved; and, Section 2. That the real property to be quitclaimed is more par~icularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That the Chairman of the District be authorized and directed to execute a Quitclaim Deed, quitclaiming a portion of easement relative to an abandoned section of Old Army Air Base trunk, in exchange for permanent easement in connection with Gisler Red Hill Trunk, Schedule B, Contract No. 7-1. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held January 10, 1973. Agenda Item #49 -T-District 7 .. RESOLUTION NO. 73-8-3 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTMJCE OF CORPORATION GRANT DEED FROM W I R DEVELOPERS, INC. A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF CORPORATION GRANT DEED FROM W I R DEVELOPERS, INC. RE MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWE~, CONTRACT 3-2 * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain Corporation Grant Deed dated December 15, 1972, wherein W I R Developers, Inc. grants to County Sanitation District No. 3, a permanent grant deed for sewer purposes relative to right of way for Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-2, southerly of Bolsa on the easterly side of the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way, in exchange for quitclaiming a portion of easement relative to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said grant deed is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said Corporation Grant Deed is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to record said Corporation Grant Deed in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held January 10, 1973. Agenda Item #53. -U-District 3 RESOLUTION NO. 73-9-3 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH W I R DEVELOPERS, INC. RE CONTRACT NO. 3-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH W I R DEVELOPERS, INC. RE MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-2 * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated January 10, 1973, between County Sanitation District No. 3 and W I R Developers, Inc. for paving of right of way received in fee, j_n exchange for quitclaiming a portion of easement relative to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-2, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 3 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held January 10, 1973. Agenda Item #51+ -V-District 3 RESOLUTION NO. 73-10-3 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF QUITCLAIM~DEED TO W I R DEVELOPERS, INC. RE CONTRACT 3-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A QUITCLAIM DEED TO W I R DEVELOPERS, INC. RE MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-2 * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Quitclaim Deed dated from County Sanitation District No. 3 to W I R Developers, Inc. be approved; and, Section 2. That the real property to be quitclaimed is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That the Chairman of the District be authorized and directed to execute a Quitclaim Deed, quitclaiming the District's interest in the certain real property, upon receipt by the District of a Corporation Grant Deed for portion of existing District easement relative to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-2. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held January 10, 1973. Agenda Item #55 -W-District 3 M E M 0 R A N D U M COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 January S, 1973 TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Deputy Chief Engineer SUBJECT: Knott Interceptor Sewer -Contract No. 3-17 Work has progressed through the curve at the intersection of Talbert and ilagnolia. The first course of pavement should be placed to this intersection by January 8, 1973. Final paving will be completed from the intersection of Brookhurst and Ellis to the intersection of Bushard antl Talbert after the vent line for the siphon at Bushard and Ellis is co~structed. This vent line will be completed after the work by the Orange County Water District contractor on the reclaimed water line has been completed through this inter~ection. It is expected that the Water District's work will be accomplished during the we~k of January 8, 1973. The replacement of the offsi te sewer to the Bank east of ~1agnolia on Talbert has been completed. There were a number of complaints from the property owners in the Greenbrook subdivision southwest of the intersection of Talbert and Magnolia. The Contractor has been using this area for stockpiling and blending of backfill material. The two main complaints were dust and noise. The noise problem has been alleviated ny moving the operation one hundred feet from the .block walls of the tract. It was noted that the District was not notified of any problem in this area until there was a Santa Ana win<l. The dust problem has been alleviated by watering the area several times a day. Work was started on the crossing of the ;\liller-Holder sewer at Slater and Magnolia. This work is expected to be completed by the time the main heading has progressed to this intersection. The work at the Oceanview Channel has remained exposed since October 15, 1972~ This structure consists of a transition in the sewer fron a pipe to a box section antl back to a pipe. The top of the box section sewer serves as the bottor.1 of the Flood Control Channel crossing in the street. The work on the Flood Control portion of the structure had to be completed by October 15, 1972 to accommodate storm runoff during the rainy season, and in compliance with the Flood Control District's requirements. The area has remained exposed to facilitate the incor- poration of this structure to the main heading which should reach this section by April 1, 1973. The tunnel under the San Diego Freeway has been completed and pipe will be placed in the tunnel when the main heading reaches this point. REL:hjm Agenda Item #56 -X-District 3 STONE & YOUNGBERG MUNICIPAL FINANCING CONSULTANTS, INC. January 9, 1973 Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester, Director of Finance County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. Sylvester: Pursuant to your request of January 9, we take pleasure in submitting this proposal to act as your financing consultant in connection with the proposed financing of the District 3 coll~ction system improvements and extensions. Our firm has acted as financing consultants in connection with joint projects for many years. Enclosed is a xerox copy of a report entitled "Financing and Adminis- tration for the Strategic Consolidation Sewerage Plan for Southern San Mateo County, California 11 • This report will serve to indicate the scope of work performed by our firm in this specialized field. We also are enclosing our brochure outlining our clients and projects as of August 1971. Since that time, the list of clients has grown by approximately one hundred fifty entities. To our knowledge, we have the largest staff of full-time financing consultants in the United States. In connection with your project, we would propose to perform the following· services: I. Assemble, review and analyze available financial, engineering, legal and economic data and information whic~ may have a bearing on financing the proposed program. 2. Provide financing information and data that may be required in connection with any aids or grants that are or may become available to assist in the financing of the proposed project. 3. Based on an analysis of the foregoing information, consult with the District on the following items: a. Applicable methods of financing such improvements; the advantages and disadvantages of each method and the general financing require- ments or restrictions applicable to each method . . ~ .. ": . 1541 W!LSHIRE BOULEVARD· LOS ANGELES. CAL:FORNIA 90017 • (213) 483-1643 Agenda Item #58 Y-1 District 3 - Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester, Director of Finance County Sanitation Districts of Orange County January 9, 1973 Page 2. b. Income and its sources that would be necessary to support annual indebtedness requirements, including the examination of possible sewer service connection charges. c. Variations in benefits to be received by major properties, taxpayers or areas. d. A specific method of financing, or alternates thereto if applicable, including tentative debt amortization schedules, estimated interest rates, application of revenues and other pertinent details relating to the indebtedness to be incurred. e. Illustrations and examples of the financial effects of the financing program on typical property owners, taxpayers or beneficiaries of the improvements. f. Recommendations as to further procedural steps to be taken and the timing of actions. ~ 4. If the issuance of bonds or other evidences of indebtedness to finance all or a part of the costs of the proposed improvements is authorized at an election or otherwise, make recommendations as· to exact terms and conditions under which· bonds are to be issued and sold, including timing and method of sale, final amortization or repayment schedules, call and redemption features, sinking fund requirements, application of revenues and other details, and cooperate with the District's bond counsel in drafting the necessary resolution of issuance and the notice of sale. · 5. Upon approval by the District of final financing details, and upon direction by the District to do so, prepare the text and other material for an official statement or bond prospectus describing the improvements, the bonds, their security, and the economic and financial background of the Di strict which may be duplicated or printed and mailed at the District 1 s expense together with copies of the official notice of sale to a comprehensive list of prospective bond bidders. We would also take such other steps as appear advisable to encourage strong competitive bidding for the bonds. Any charges by bond rating agencies would be borne by the Di strict. 6. During the entire· course of employment we would be available at reasonable times ·for consultation and advice relating to the financial aspects of the contemplated improvement program. 7. For the services to be rendered hereunder, the following fee schedule would apply: Agenda Item #58 Y-2 District 3 Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester, Director of Finance County Sanitation Districts of Orange County January 9, 1973 Page 3. a. .For the services outlined in paragraphs 1 through 3 above the sum of · $250. 00. per day, such sum to be not less than $1, 500. 00 nor more than $4,500.00. b. For the services to be rendered under paragraphs 4 through 6 above the fee shall be negotiated with the District in the event bonds are sold to finance all or a portion of the project. Thank you for requesting this proposal from our firm. If you have any further questions, or if you require any further material, please do not hesitate to contact us through our Los Angeles office. Very truly yours, STONE & YOUNGBERG MUNICIPAL FINANCING CONSULTANTS, INC. Robert G. Bulot Vice President //~~~A/ RGB:sb Enclosures. Agenda Item #58 Y-3 District 3 . ,,.."? AGE N DA MID-YEAR SESSION .... Ar.TNUAL WORK CONFERENCE February 1 -3 , 1973 Thursday , February 1 , 1973 Comm i ttee Wor k Sessions 1 0 :00 a ,m, 11 : 00 a , m, Registrati on : Participants and Guests $30 , Wives $10 12:00 noon Director s ' Committee Manage r s ' Committee Attor neys ' Comm ittee Ex e cutive Commit t ee General Buffet Lw1cheon 2-5 :00 p .m. -Continue Committee Sessions (as needed) 2 :00 p ,m , Special Topic -Manag er s & All "Seminar on OSHA" 3 :00 p ,m, 6 : 00 p . m. All Other Committees on Call By -laws , Prog ram and Audit , Inter-Associati on , Membe r ship , Puhlic Relations , Nominati ng and Advisory , and Associates . Informal We lcome * * * Friday , February 2 , 1973 Impact Work Sessions 8 :30 a ,m, 9 :00 a .m. Registrati on (continued) Opening Confer ence Session Pres i dent 's Helcome Salute to Flag Introductions Approval of Minutes , January 29 , 1972 Treasurer's Report Executive Di rector 's Report Old Business Report of the By -laws Committee Coffee Br eak Islands A Etna Room Tonga Room Garden Suite Islands B I s lands A Various Garden Su i te Islands A 10 :15 a .m. 10 :30 a .m. Impact Pane l : "Manag emen t Planning Agency Concept" ,. 1 2 :00 noon 2:00 p .m . J:JO p .m. 6 :00 p ,m, Luncheon Speaker Norman Y. Mineta , President Bay Area Sewage Services Agency "BASSA ' s Approach to Regional Solutions" And Introducing The Ne w General Manager , Paul c. Sol tow , Jr. Reconve ned General Session General Seminar on Legislation Attorneys -Directors -Managers I s l ands B I s lands A Impact Panel : "Environmental Impact Following 'Friends of Mammouth vs Mono County '" President 's Reception Etna-Tonga Rooms * * * Saturday , February J , 1973 Business Session (continued) 9 :00 a ,m, 11:00 a,m, 1 2:00 noon 2 :00 p.m . 4 : 00 p , m, Reconvened General Session Committee Reports Islands A "Coordinating Water Pollution Control Activities" Fred A. Harper , President California Water Pollution Control Association Luncheon Speaker lfinf red H, Adams , Chair:nan State Water Resources Control Boar d "Where Next in Porter-Cologne?" Conclude General Session Continued Business and Committee Reports Proposed By-laws Changes Membership Other Business Adjournment * * * Islands B Islands A M E.M 0 RAND UM .---------- TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS FROM: ROBERT F. FINNELL, JOINT CHAIRMAN COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 For many years the Districts have been involved in a lawsuit against Amercoat Corporation, et al. Since many of us are not familiar with the details, I have asked the General Counsel for a summary of the· entire matter. I realize that it is a District No. 3 suit, but most of the Directors are interested. Attached is the summary prepared by Mr. Nisson. ii .. MILLER. NISSON S KOGLER CLARK MILLER TELEPHONE C. ARTHUR NISSON NELSON KOGLER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2014 NORTH BROADWAY AREA CODE 714 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706 H. LAWSON M EAO January 3, 1973 Mr. Robert Finnell Chairman Executive Committee County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California.92708 Dear Mr. Finnell: Re: County Sanitation District No. 3 vs Amercoat Corporation, et al With reference to your inquiry concerning the suit by District No. 3 against Amercoat Corporation, et al, here- with is a summary of the action which I hope wil~ make for a better understanding concerning this matter. 542-6771 In constructing trunk sewer lines in 1959 and 1960, District No. 3, on recomrnencation of its Engineers, specified that the interior surface of the manhole structures were to be coated.with a protective coating. One of the materials specified was a product made by the Amercoat Corporation and this is the material which was ultimately selected by the low bidder on the various contracts, each contractor constructing a different reach of the trunk sewer system. All of the contracts contained a guarantee of the materials and workmanship on this coating material for a period of five years. The exact working of the guarantee was set forth on page 4 of the Opinion of the Appellate Court, which I am sub- mitting herewith. Wi thfn a year to a year and a half after completion of the job, a breakdown of this coating was noted in certain of the manhole structures. In July, 1961 the District caused an inspec- tion to be made of one manhole constructed under Contract 3-1 and one under Contract 3-2. The Inspector discovered there was spauling, tuberculation, inflorescence and sulphide concentrations in these manhole structures. A written report was presented to the General Manager of the Districts, Lee·M. Nelson. On January 26, 1962 Lee M. Nelson contacted the Amercoat Corporation and Cook & Barletta, the subcontractors who actually applied the material, verbally and advised them of the defects Mr. Robert Finnell -2-January 3, 1973 with the manhole coating. Prior to that time and following the July report, the Districts had Boyle and Lowery, consulting engineers, make a de~ailed study of the manhole structures. This study revealed, in my opinion, a substantial amount of breakdown in the coating. I recall Mr. Nelson advised me at that time that there was a problem with the structures and I suggested that we should put the contractors and supplier on notice. He stated no, that he wanted to handleit informally and directly and try to hold the manufacturer liable and said wait until the five year period to see how much damage had occurred. There was a subsequent examination of the structures prior to the running of the five year guarantee period and I was instructed just prior to the termination of the five years on each contract to notify the contractors, subcontractors and manufacturer of the deficiencies. This was done and they made no response with reference to correcting the matter. Subsequently, the District authorized the filing of a lawsuit and this was filed in April, 1968. One of the reasons for the delay in filing the lawsuit was the impossibility of determining the extent df repairs neces- sary and the cost of making such repairs. This still remains a large and undecided item. Our total complaint was for $93,000 against the defendants who now remain in the lawsuit. The de- fendants now remaining are Cooke & Barletta, subcontractors who are the principal defendants and if judgment is finally sustained they will probably be the ones held financially responsible. I am informed and have reason to believe they would be unable to respond to any substantial judgment. The defendants Transamerica Indemnity Company could be liable in an amount not to exceed $27,000 and the defendant Rados ·could be liable in an amount not to exceed $25,000. Cook & Barletta could be liable for $41,000 in addition to the above amounts. In addition to the large problem of the measure of damages, a principal issue of the timeliness of the action of the Districts in putting those liable upon the guarantee upon notice. The position the Districts took was they did not have to do this until at or near its termination. The position of the defendants was that you had to give notice upon first discovery. As you see in reading the Appellate Opinion, the Appellate Court decided that neither position was correct and that the Dis- trict was obliged to give written notice when it had knowledge of substantial defects. This issue is to be petermined by the Trial Court on retrial. I will be glad to give you an evaluation of the case personally and answer such questions as may arise. Very truly yours, ··, /-. ( \~· / -~ ... " ,I ' &.:.?Z:'z ___ .~~/h CAN:ac C. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel , ·'"'. r'"-T" ~r. r-·"·• :-···:~ ... r· :····· :~:;;:"·f~ ., .... I '.J u ~ ' .. . ..... I .... \J I l • v. I • ... .. • .• . • ·-. -j \ ._ ... COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH DISTRICT SECOND DIVISION. S~ATE OF CALIFORNIA COu~TY SANITATION DISTRICT N0.3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ) ) ) } ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff and Appellant, v. . .AMERCOAT CORPORATION, Et Al, Defendants and Respondents. ) _______________________________________ ) JUdN H. Mcuu ~·:!:..LL, Clerk ............................................... o~;·r;ur.;;·cic.rk 4 Civil 11835 (Sup.Ct.No. 159768) 0 P I N I 0 N APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County. Bruce w. Sumner, Judge. Reversed. Miller, N·isson & Kogler and C. Arthur Nissan for Plain- tiff and Appellant. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Har.lpton and Terence l-1. Murphy for Defendants and Respondents Transamerica Insurance Company and American Su~ety Company of New York. · Chandler & Anns:t~ong, and· Kenyon K. Kohne for Defendants and Respondents Cook & Barletta, Francis B. Cook, Robert J. Barletta and Steve P. Rados, Inc. Shield & Smith and Ron c. Gunsaulus for Defendants and Responden:ts Cook & Barletta, Francis· B. Cook and Robert J. · Barletta. BY THE COURT Appellarit is County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange -1- -. County. The litigation has its source in several contracts made and performed during 1959 and 1960 for the construction of sewers. Respondents are Steve P. Rados, Inc., a general contractor; Cook & Barletta, a partnership, the installing ~ subcontractor; and Transamerica Insurance Company and American Surety Company of New York, who ·executed performance bonds on the job. A complaint filed by the district on April 22, 1968 named Amercoat Corporation as a defendant in the first cause of action. The dis.trict alleged that Amercoat Corporation --_war! anted in~writing that its product "Amercoat No. 16" would prevent corrosion in sewer manholes and structures for five years, and ·that the product was defective and did not conform to the warranty. Arnercoat Corporation moved for summary judg- ment, and supported its motion with a declaration that, although it guaranteed the standard quality of the product and its ad- herence to published specifications, it expressly disclaimed responsibility for results obtained because the use of the product was beyond its control. Junercoa:t· >::_corporation's motion· for surmnary judgment was granted. Amercoat Corporation is not a party to this appeal. • 1 The complaint included other allegations as follows. The district and Steve P. Rados, Inc. entered into a contract for the construction of sewers, designated "Contract 3-2." Pursuant to the terms of .the contract, on June 25, 1960, Steve P. Rados, Inc. and Cook & Barletta, the installing -2- ;,_ ... subcontractor, signed an agreement whereby each guaranteed to repair or replace all defects in workmanship or materials of the protective linings or coat~ngs installed in the sewer · manholes and structures, the guarantee to run for a period . . ·"-"" of five years. On June 17, 1965, prior to· the expiration of the five-year period, the district notifi~e P. Rados, Inc. and Cook & Barletta that the protective or coatings had proved to be defective in workmanship or materials. The district requested Steve P. Rados, In~. and Cook & Barletta to repair or replace all defects, .but despite the guarantees given to the district, Steve P. Rados, Inc. and Cook & Barletta failed and refused to do so by reason of which the district incurred expense in the amount of $25,000. Cook & Barletta were named in additional· counts cover- ing other sewer construction contracts within the same general project ("Contract 3-1" and "Contract 3-3"). However, the basic problem common to all the contracts is exemplified by_ Contract 3-2 and discussion of· that contract covers the others as well. One defense was the four-year statute of limitations presqribed for the commencement of actions upon a written contract. (Code.Civ. Proc., §337, subd. 1.) A special hear- ing was held for the determination of that issue, and t}?.e facts germane to the defense were presented by a stipulated reference to documents already on file in the case. -3- One document was the guarantee of Steve P. Rados, Inc. and Cook & Barletta. It reads: "Ne hereby gu~rantee the protective coating we have installed in the manholes and structures on the MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER CONTRACT 3-2 for County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, District~.No •. 3 for a period of five (5) years from date. We .agree ~o repair or replace any or all such.work, together with any work which may be displaced in so doing., that may prove defective in workmanship or.materials within . the period from date of acceptance without expense what- soever to County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, . . District No .. 3, ordinary wear and tear and unusual.abuse or neglect excepted. In the event of our failure to comply with the above mentioned conditions within a reasonable time after being notified in writing, we collectively or separately do hereby authorize the Owner ·, to proceed to have the defects repaired and made good at our expense and will pay the costs and c~arges there- .. . .... . for immediately upon demand." A second document was comprised of admissions of fact made by the district to the following effect. · On January 26, 1962, the general manager of the district indicated to Arnercoat Corporation that there was a problem with corrosion of the Amercoat No. 16 applied to the sewer manholes and -4- ,- .. ,. ~. . se·wer construction; that on June 3, 1963, a meeting was held with officials of Amercoat Corporation regarding the corrosion; and that prior to April 21, 1964, the general manager. knew that d~age had occurred because of corrosion of Arnercoat No. 16 in certain of the sewer manholes and sewer construction which are the subject of this-acj:ion. Also stipulated in evidence was a memoran~ administrative officer of the district to its general manager, · dated July 20, 1961. The memorandum disclosed that deteriora- tion had already appeared in coating and recommended that the district's engineers ."should submit recommendations for cor-·· rective procedures to existing damage in Arnercoating." As for the district's case, the first witness was the author of the 1961 memorandum. He expl.ained the technical terms of the memorandum and outlined the methods· of inspection which revealed the deterioration. The kind of deterioration involved can be envisioned by reference to the technical terms and the explanation thereof: · .Inflores.cence, "a chemical crystal growth that is protruding from the shaft lining itself": Tuberculation, "a knobbylike appearance that has not.broken through as yet • • · ~ a mushy appearing material under the coating itself"; . Spauling, "coating i'tself • • .• falling off or debrided from the wall of the manhole." The witness testi- fied that the i.nspection which prompted the memorandum was a spot check, induced by trouble reports received from maintenance -s- ... \ · .. ·. personnel. He said, "Well, I assumed the damage to be :generally spread based on the very small survey that I made and the field report that came in." A second.witness c~lled by the district reviewed forms denominated "Concrete coating inspection field check list," which were prepared during inspections made in June 1965. The reports showed the damage to the concrete coating to be general throughout the area covered, although varying in type and extent from place to place. He testified that the inspection was ~e first complete survey, but.that reports of corrosion from maintenance crews were made during the period 1961 to early 1964, and that the reports were of substantial damage •. On the foregoing record the court found "that on or before. Jul~, 20, 1961 [the district] had actual knowledge that there, was spauling, tuberculation, inflorescence and sulphide concentrations in a substantial amount of the man- hole structur~s; that prior to· April 21, 1964, more than four· (4) years prior to [the district] filing its complaint there was extensive and substantial damage in and throughout .- the entire system of manhole structures and that [the district] ·. .had actual knowledge of this.damage prior to said date; that if · upon a trial of this action on the merits [the district] could prove.· such damage to be a breach of any obligation of [the -6- '. I • f ' i f i respondents], such breach did in fact occur and [the district]' knew and had actual knowledge of such breach prior to April 21, 1964; that [the district's] cause of action, if any, as to each and every (respondent) arose prior to A~ril 21, 1964, ~ more than four years prior to [the district] filing its action herein." The contractors, in favor of the judgment, urge that: "The stat"J.te of limitations comrnenc"es to run.on the date the plaintiff discovers the breach of warrant." The district, seeking reversal, argues that: ·"The event that started the statute of limitations was the end of the .:.. five year guarantee period." Neither the district nor the contractors perceive the correct rule. The key to the solution is found in the guarantee itself. In the trial court the written instrument was treated as com- prehensible solely upon its own terms and ~ithout the aid of evidence to interpret the same. Accordingly, it is the duty of this court to interpret the instrument (Parson v. Bristol Development Co., 62 Cal.2d 861, 865-866), as explained by reference to the circumstances under which it was made, and the matter to which it reiates. (Civ. Code, §1647.) · The essential element of the guar~ntee is the representa- tion made to the district by both the general contractor and . . the installing contractor that the pro~ective coating was free -7- ·• .. .. fron defects in workmanship or materials. The subordinate elements of the guarantee relate to the remedy for breach of the representati~n and the duration of the liability therefor. To prove a cause of action for money damages against the contractors on the guarantee, the district ~ would have to make the following showing: (1) Deterioration of the protective coating; (2) appearing within fiv~-years; (3) caused by defects in workmanship or materials; and (4) not repaired or replaced.by the contractors "within a.reason- able time after being notified in writing." ·As.to the fourth element of the cause of action, the guarantee does not specify when notice of defective workman- ship or materials must be given to the contractors by the district, and the law allows the district a reasonable time therefor (Civ. Code; §1657). A reasonable time for giving notice of defects to the contractors would be one that would ~ allow the purposes of ~h~ notice to be realized. One purpose of the notice would ~e to enable the contractors to make a timely investigation of the deterioration so as to determine whether it was caused by defects in workmanship. or materials. If investigation revealed that the deterioration was caused by such defects, the·contractors would have the. duty to repair or replace the same. The contractors would also have a privilege to perform the repair or replacement. Thus, a· second purpose of the notice is manife~t, namely, to permit -a- ----- • j .. the contractors, after investigation, to hold their costs to a miniraum by taking that stitch in time that saves nine. To satisfy the. ~wo purposes,· the written notice required to be given by the district must be made within a reasonable time after the~ district discovers evidence of deterioration. In the light of the foregoing, the contractors' theory that the statute of limitations begins to run when the deterio- . ration appears must be re]ected. 'J?he guarantee pennits a reasonable time for notice, investigation, and repair before a cause of action accrues against the contractors for breach of the guarantee. The statute of limitations begins to run when the cause of action accrues. (Code Civ. Proc., .§312.) The contention of the district that it can hold up the running of the statute by delaying notice until the last day of the guarantee must also be rejected since notice given without regard to the time of the appearance of deterioration could entirely defeat· the purposes of the notice, which .are to permit seasonable investigation and prompt repair. Thus it cannot be determined whether the statute of limitations has run unless two preliminary facts are firs:t determined: (1) the last date which would have constituted a reasonable time for the district to give notice of defect and demand for repair; and (2) the last date which would have constituted a reasonable time for the contractors to investi- ·gate and make repairs or r·ernedy the defect if such was their -9- -· -~ duty. These preliminary facts were not determined by the trial court and its conclusions that the statute of limita- tions had run is not, therefore, supported by necessary 1/ findings of fact, and the judgment must be reversed.- The judgment is reversed and the case remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the views herein expressed. Appellant and respondents shall bear their own costs • . !/ \·le feel compelled to approach the case from a statute of limitations standpoint because of the nature of the proceedings below, a trial of the special limitations defense. We observe, however, that under proper analysis the question of limitations might.never be reached. The court found, in . ···· essence, that the district had knowledge of substantial defects on or before July 20, 1961. Giving the district the benefit of any doubt, on the evidence before us it appears that the district gave no notice to the contractors until June 17, 1965. If the delay from July 20, 1961 to June 11, 1965 was unreasonable, the district cannot recover, not because of the statute of limitations, but because of its failure to perform a condition precedent (giving notice of defect within a reasonable time) to contractors' obligation under the guarantee. -10- January 16, 1973 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-29?C (714) 962-2411 M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: Ray E. Lewis In order that we may complete right-of-way transactions authorized by the Boards of Directors at the January 10th meeting, we need the following documents at your earliest convenience: DISTRICT 7 Resolu~ion No. 73-6-7: Grant of Easement and map -Irvine Industrial Complex ·~ Resolution No. 73-7-7: Quitclaim Deed and map -Irvine Industrial Complex DISTRICT 3 Resolution No. 73-8-3: map re WIR Developer's Corporation Grant Deed Resolution No. 73-9-3: revised agreement with WIR Developers, Inc. Resolution No. 73-10-3: map re Quitclaim Deed to WIR Developers Re other items still pending, we have not received copies of the following: Resolution No. 72-139-7: Grant of Easement and agreement with Santa Fe Land Improvement Company (approved at 11/8 Board meeting) Resolution No. 72-163-11: Grant of Easement and map from Southern California Edison Company (approved at 12/13 Board meeting) Resolution No. 72-166: Hoag Hospital (approved at 12/13 Board meeting) JWS:rb J. ne Sylvester Seer tary of the Boards of Directors COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE [EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAYJ Janua.ry 18, 1973 Williamson and Schmid 1535 East First Street Santa Ana, C.lifornia 92701 Attention: Mr. Jindrew G. Gall, Jr. Subject: Grant of Easement -Irvine Industrial Complex Enclosed herewith is Grant of Easement which has been prepared pursuant to your request o!' December 6th. Please have this document executed and return to this off ice for execution on the behalf of Sanitation District No. 7 and recordation of the same. REL:hjm Enclosure Ray E. Lewis Deputy Chief Engineer TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REG ULJ\H J OINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF CO UNTY SANITATIO N DISTRICTS NOS . 1, 2 , 3, 5, 6 , 7 and 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CAL IFORN IA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County· Sanitation Districts Nos . 1, 2 , 3, 5, 6 , 7 , and 11, of Orange County, California , was he l d at the hou r of 7 :30 p .m., January .10 , 1 973 , 10844 Ellis Avenue , Fountain Valley, California . The Chairman of the J oint Adm ini s trative Organization called the meeting to order at 7 :30 p .m. The roll was called and the Secre tary reported a quorum present for each District's Board. * * * * * * * * * ALL DIS TRIC TS Re p ort o f special committee on compensation of department heads and authorizing retroac tive department heads salary adjustment Following a b r ief report by Direct or Winn, Chairman of the Special Commi ttee on Compensat ion of Departme nt Heads, it was moved: seconde d and duly c a rried : That any sal ar y ad j us t men t s approved by t h e Board of Directors purs uant to r ecommendations of the Special Committee on Compen s ation of Departme nt Heads, be made retroac tive to Janua r y 1, 1973. · STYl'E OF CA LIFORNI Al SS . COUNTY OF ORA NGE I, J . WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Di stricts Nos . 1, 2 , 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County , California , do hereby certify that t he above and forego i ng to be full, truE' and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Direc t ors on the 10th day of J anuary 19 73 ' IN WITNESS WHE REOF, I have he reu:R1to set my hand this 2 1 st day of March, 1 973. ; / 1,J,~ d ~~-~~~~....__..,_~-.....,...----· ..S~ec e Ja.;!Y eir fh e Boards of Di rec to rs -::{of ~ounty S~ita tion Districts -Nos . -: 1, 2 , '3 , 5 ,~6 , 7, and 11 ·-""' -,.,_ . --- S-107 ./ ·. EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.~., January 10 , 19 73 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District's Board. * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 2 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., January 17, 1973. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:36 p.m., January 10, 1973. STATE OF CALIFORNIAl SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation.Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 10th day of January 19 73 10th S-107 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have day of January, 1973. ' this JANUARY 10, 1973 JOINT MEETING fi6 -Report of Joint Chairman Discussed 1972 County Gr.and Jury Report regarding Sanitation Districts and their recommendations that the Board implement provisions of Assembly Bill No. 2146 in March 1973, and that the seven Sanitation Districts Boards be consolidated into one Board with 5 or 10 members. Previously a majority of the Directors voted not to accept the consolida- tion recommendation. Mr~ .Finnell mentioned that neither former Chairman Just nor hims~lf were invited to discuss this matter with the grand jury and said he was very disappointed that a recommendation would be made on policy matters without the Joint Chairman of the Districts being asked to at least discuss the matter with them. Intends to make a recommendation to at least invite the Joint Chairman to discuss policy matters with the grand jury. Mr. Finnell appointed a Special Committee .of past joint chairman to make recommendations relative to the Directors' fee schedule based on the passage of Assembly Bill 2146. (Special Committee on Directors' Fees For Concurrent Board Meetings) -Norman E. Culver, Edward Just and Clifton Miller. Called Mr. Brown anc read commendation resolution to him, etc. Called a meeting of the Executive Committee for January 30th at 5:30 and invited Directors Rogers and Stevens to attend and participate in the discussion. It was also requested later that Mr. Parsons be invited to attend the meeting. #7 -Report of General Manager Mr. Harper reported that we received the initial payment from the Irvine Ranch Water District for capacity rights in the Districts' ocean outfall ·system which was $537,000. Also reported on upcoming meeting of CASA on February 2nd and 3rd at Islandia Hotel in San Diego. Meeting will be concerned with legislation. District3 will make all arrangements for Directors if they wish to go. Will be 1iscussing any legislation that Districts wish for corning State legisla ~~re. Also Section 208 of Federal -Act, which has to do with planning of regional programs, will be discussed and will be interested in this and some of the concepts that are projected. Referred to progress reports on construction in various Districts which were attached to agenda. Reported on retirement of County Treasurer, Ivan Swanger. Said that he worked with us closer than was the prevailing practice of other departments of CountJ and City. Recommended that a Resolution of appreciation for his services over the years be passed by the Directors. Chair entertained a motion to prepare commendation resolution to O.C. Treasurer. Unanimous. Regarding the federal definition of secondary t reatment, Mr. Harper stated that it was suppose to be published on December 18th but has not been published yet. Called Washington, D.C. and appears that they are going to come out with two definitions. Don't have details. One for existing facilities and one for new facilities. EPA has uneasy feeling about definition of secondary treatment. Looks like the end of the month before this will be published. Also reported that next month would be the 6-month review of Districts' budgets and expenditures. p. 2 Griset asked what happened on January 4th with the State Board? Finnell answered that we received on January 2nd information that there was going to be a meeting on January 4th to establish priority categories for 1972-73 grants. Mr. Harper had determined that Regional Board had recommended that our Project Report No. 1 ($19 million) be placed in category "G .". No Category . "G" programs would be funded. State's money would probably not go beyond "B" or "C". Category "A" projects were those who had not done anything and who had cease and desist orders. Executive Comrµittee met on Jan. 3rd and at their directio·n FAH attending meeting in Sacramento on the 4th, and succeeded in getting the Districts moved to Category "B''. Officially the action taken on Jan. 4th was to include those complying to the Ocean Plan within the definition of Category "B". On January 18th will put specific projects in each of these categories. Only reason for changing category definition was to include our project in this category. Mr. Finnell called about 15 minutes before this meeting and explained Executive Committee's feelings and what future actions they would take. #8 -Report of General Counsel . Commented on Grand Jury recommendation -Under existing law is not possible to consolidate into one Board with 5 or 10 members. Most that could be accomplished is one representative from each city and sanitary district. Should Districts at some time consolidate, could get down to maybe 20 or so members. Will take new legislation or a new entity to take over the entire operation. Also said that if Directors had any ideas for legislation they thought would be to the benefit of the Districts, should pass them on to Nissan so he could get underway with having somebody introduce them and run them through CASA for comment. Have tentative l y set aside February 1st to go to Attorneys Committee meeting in San Diego and expect to discuss new legislation to limit our tax rate. Mentioned that during the last month, had a number of in~uiries concerning effects of Proposition 20. Other activities: Working on right of way, primarily on 2-14-1, westerly of Santa Ana River in vicinity of where Harbor crosses the river. Have reviewed a couple of agreements and revised a few~ Staff or party involved writes the agreement and sends it to Nissan to approve. Has worked reasonably well for several years. Spent about 8 hours in meetings and 4 or 5 hours on the phone with staff. Reasonably typical month. #ll(c) -Actions considered in executive session Recommended that authority be given to engage a Special Trial Counsel as recommended by Executive Committee. Motion to do so was made, seconded and carried. #12 -Special Committee 9n Compensation of Dept. Heads Winn reported that some items came up that will require further study but recommendation will include some salary adjustment. He then moved that the Joint Board authorize any salary adjustment be retroactive to January 1st · of this year. Motion was seconded and carried. Said Committee hoped to be able to report by next Joint Meeting. p. 3 #13 -Report of Executive Committee Mr. Harper advised the Directors of another meeting coming up -the W.P.C.F. Workshop in Los Angeles on February 8th. Thought this meeting would be of some significance as far as what was going on at national level. Anyone that wishes .to attend should .contact Mr. Harper. Mr. Just commented regarding League of Cities. Most Directors fairly active and bring back a lot of valuable information to cities. Very few of these other meeting~ attended by Directors. At most meetings find the staff and usually ohly the Joint Chairman. Would be extremely valuable if more of the Directors would attend these meetings. Castro asked about the location of this .meeting .and was told it was at the International Hotel in LA. · #15 -Technical report to Calif. Regional WQCB Regarding preparation of final report, used 1-1/2 John Carollo Engineers men and 2 of our men to put this report together in past few months. San Diego spent $75,000 and Los .Angeles $360,000. General Manager of LA County had indicated they just dropped everything and put whole staff on this project. Think that our staff and JCE should be commended on putti~g thiq valuable report together in an efficient manner. #20 -Other business ALL DISTRICTS Kymia reported on his discussion with State Board. Were two items before State Board last Thursday. One that Mr. Harper reported on with regard to priorities, and think that General Manager was quite modest in his report. Did an excellent job in convincing State Board to move from "G" to "B" priority. Only items "A" and "B" will be funded this year. Purpose of Kymla's presentation was to represent all of the wastewater agencies in Orange County with regard to new requirements of Clean Water Grant program. It would prohibit any grant applications that would build facilities for current population, plus five-year's growt l . Other agencies in Orange County got together with General Manager (FAH) ~~d were able to come up with recommended alternative to State Board. Where there is a backbone facility will fund these on not more than five-year basis.(??) State Board received this recommendation from Orange County which was endorsed by other agencies - 5 participating agencies in Wastewater Management. Also received endorsement of many agencies in Bay area and joint Ventura Sanitation Agencies. State Board asked that record be kept open until 19th of January until they receive response from Air Resources Management. Will either not accept staff's recommendation for 5-year limitation or will accept recommendation forwarded by Congress for Orange County. Miller suggested that Lindsley Parsons should be invited to the next Executive Committee meeting to report on SCCWRP progress or lack .thereof. Had one meeting but nothing happened at that meeting. Our management is not making progress so perhaps Executive Committee should take that up and get with General Managers of other agencies. #54 -Agreement with WIR Deveopers, Inc. It was moved, seconded and carried that the agreement be approved J, subject to the General C.ounsel' s approval . .;;.. t er~ la-P 1\ ~-e... #56 -Report on construction of Knott Intercep or, 3-17 Mr. Harper reported that a 96" line was being constructed through Fountain Valley and fringes of Huntington Beach. Have had some complaints from home owners in some of the areas.re some stockpiling. Contractor pretty well took care of the one situation: Another situation is that contractor left excavation that is the roadway and there is a slight detour. Have received complaint and are working with the contractor and City of Huntington Beach engineering pepartment and if it does create a serious problem, would probably be back to the B~ard for some instructions. Will advise the person who has the complaint of the fact that we are asking the contractor to complete as much as possible and clean up the situation. #57 -Routing of Knott Interceptor, 3-18 Culver reported that through the efforts of McWhinney and his contact with Southern California Edison, talked to Mr. Cavanaugh and he is working closely with people of Edison. Thought he would have a definite answer within two weeks but thought we should proceed with drawings. Conrad Hohener said that he talked to Mr. Cavanaugh and was referred to Wm. Compton, Area Manager for Edison Company. Four departments have to give their approval for this proposed routing through their property: Transmissions, Substations, Right of Way, and Administration. He is in the process of making the formal request such as sending letters and maps to the _ various departments. If one of the four departments objects to this proposed routing, then he will so notify the City and the District, and their decision will be no. Mr. Compton said it did look favorable pased on preliminary discussions with people within the company. Will have fo~mal processing complete within two weeks. Mr. Hohener asked if there w·is any other information that Edison needed and they said no. Vander 111:-~a1 asked if Mr. Hohener would recommend that we go ahead with the drawings and Conrad said he would recommend that we wait until we receive notice from them. Will start with preparation of recommended descriptions or plats, and if we get a positive answer, can process through Edison Co. Mr. Harper asked if it wouldn't be wise to ask the Board for authorization to proceed once we get authority from the Edison Company. It was moved and seconded to accept recommendation of the staff and to proceed. Motion carried. #58 -Stone & Youngberg proposal JWS reported on meeting with Stone & Youngberg and submission of their prop0'sal. Their purpose is to review the District's financial requirements and make a recommendation to the Board. Can do this ·in time for the March 7th meeting. Their fee is -$250 per .day with a minimum of $1,500 and a maximum of $4,500. It is the staff's recommendation to accept this proposal. Moved, seconded and carried to accept proposal. #60 -Other business Re 3-18 routing, McWhinney asked gheaper was it than the original the right of way is given free. was approximately $170.000. if the routing was approved how much routing? Conrad answered $20,000 providing Total savings from one r _ecommended by City