Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972-12-13COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) December 8, 1972 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 Gentlemen: TELEPHONES: AREA C::ODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6', 7 and 11, of Orci..nge County, California, will be held: Wednesday evening, December 13, 1972 at 7:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Tentative adjournments prier to next regular meeting: District No. 2 Executive Committee - District No. 3 7:30 p.m., December 20 (Public Hearing) 5:00 p.m., January 3 (Immediately preceding District No. 3 meeting and public hearing) 7:30 p.m., January 3 (Public Hearing) MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS Post Office Box 8 12 7 l 0844 Ell is Av enue Foun tai n' Va lley, Ca lif ., 92708 Te lephones: Area Code 71 4 540-2 910 9 62-2 4 11 De c em b e r 8, 1 972 REGULAR MEETING Wedn esday, De cemb er 1 3, 1972 7 :30 p .m. The fol l owing is a brief explanation of t h e more impo rta nt non -r outine i t ems wh ich a ppear on t he enc l osed age n d a a nd wh ich a r e n o t o t he rwi se self -e x p lanatory . Wa r r ant lists are not a t tac h ed to the agenda sinc e they are ma d e u p i mme diate l y p r eced i ng t he mee ting b u t wi l l appear in t he compl e te age nd a a v ai labl e at the meeting . Joint Boards No . 6 -Repor t of t he Joint Chairman -The Joi nt Cha i rman will repo r t on meet i ngs he and ~ a t tended in Washington , D.C., r e l ati ve to t he 1972 Federal Water Po llut i on Control Amend - ment s . which a r e now being implemented by the Environmental Protect i on Agency . No . 1 2 -Repo r t of the Executive a n d Bu i lding Com.~ittees a n d Acti ons on the Committees 1 Recommendations -The Comm ittees me t on the evening of Decembe r 6th, with Director Kymla as a g u es t . A wri tten repo r t on this meeti ng , together with the r ecommendati ons to the Joint Boa r ds , is included with the agenda materi al . The exec utive session noted on the agenda concerns r ec ent 11 mee t -and -con fer 11 d i sc u ssi ons wi th representat i ves o f the Ora n ge County Em ploy ees Associa t ion . No . 1 3 -Con sent Ca l enda r -The fo l l ow i ng agenda i t ems fa l l int o thi s cat ego r y i n accordance wi t h the definition established b y t he Board s : (a) Change Order for Interpl ant Influent Interce ptor , Job No . I -b -This Change Order represents an added cost of $8,682 .17 . The contractor was required to provi de additional bedding rock in areas where there we r e l ayers of peat , which made ove r-excavation n e c essar y . In addition, the contr actor encountered a l a r ge conc r ete obstructi on whic h was not shown on t he p l ans . Also , we required a sewe r connect i on to serve the Districts ' new shops and warehouse . It is r ecommended that t he Change Order be approved . (b) Deny Cl aim for Damages -The Ci ty of Fountain Va lley and a l ocal r e sident have filed with the Di stricts forma l c laims f or damages allegedly caused by the contractor constructing the Interplant Influent I nterceptor on Br ookhurst south of Ellis Ave nue . It i s t he General Counse l 's re comme ndation that the claims b e deni ed and the matter be referred to the Districts ' contractor , Kordick a n d Rados, a j oint venture. (c) Authorization for the Gene ral Manage r to Attend WPCF Workshop in Detroit on De cember 12th -Du ring the Joint Cha irman 's and General Manager's visit to the Environmental Protection Agency headquarters in Washington , D.C., it was suggested by several offic i als t hat the Districts be r epresented at a one -day workshop on 1 972 Amendment s to the Water Po llution Control Act, t o be held in De troit on Decembe r 12th . The program provides for an interchange between Washington EPA staff personnel and management representing majo r age ncies . The action appearing on t he agenda ratifies .t he General Mana ge r's attendance at this workshop, as r ecommen9ed by the Executive Comm i ttee . (d) Award of Chlorine Contract -The cu rrent contract to purchase chlorine will expire December 31st, there - for e , new contract bids we r e received on December 6 th . The specifications call. for a one -year contract , with the Districts ' option to renew for an add i t i onal one year period . Three bids we r e r e ceived, and the apparent low bidder is Georgia Pacific Co rporation at $112 .70 per ton . (e) Purchase of Engine Analyzing Equi pme nt Unit , Six 4 -Wheel Electric Ca r s, One 1/2 -Ton Pickup Truck , Three 1 -Ton Fl at Bed Trucks , Four 1 -Ton Cao and Chass i s , and One 16,000 lb . GVW T ruck with Articulated Hydraul ic Cran e -The purchase of · t his equipment was i nc lud e d in t h is yea r's budget, and eight of the equipment items are replacement s . A bid tabulation is included with the agenda material . (f) Purchase of Mod ified Heads and Ma nifolds for Waukesha Sl udge Gas Engin es -The staff is recomme nding t h at t he negotiated exchange and purchase of parts for the sludge gas engin es be approved (see enc l osed memo - randum from the Districts ' Maintenance S up erint e nd ent). -2 - No . 1 5 -Report and Recommendation of the Gene ral Counse l Pert ain i ng to the Award of Job No . P2 -21, Digesters N and O. On November 21 , the Districts opened bids for the construction o f t wo addi t i onal digeste r s at Treatment Plant No . 2 . These structures will be built in the diges t e r comp l ex at the plant a s a part of the 1971 -72 St ate and Fede r al Gr ant construction p r o gram . State a n d Fede r al a ut ho ritie s have app roved 80% fund ing of t he project. Th i s matte r, howeve r, h a s been referred t o t he General Counsel since t hese fac ilities will be constructed wit h i n 1 ,000 yards of the ocean, wh i ch means we may be subject to the provis i ons of Proposition 20 , the r ecently-adopted Con - stit u tional Amendment affecting development along Ca l ifornia 's coastline . Mr . Ni sson will r eport at· the meeting . No . 1 6 -Proposed Change in Cl ean Water Grant Program -The Stat e Water Resources Control Board is considering a change in t he ir Grant r egulations which would establish rest r ictions on t he s i ze of facilities to be constructed to existing needs plus five years qf growth in "critical air a r eas". If this r egulation is .ad opted as proposed , most of Southern Ca l ifornia wi ll be affe c ted and se r ious financial b urdens may be p l aced on our taxpaye r s as a r es ult. I t has been suggested by seve r al managers of o ther wate r and wastewater agen c i es i n Orange County , that a unifi ed position paper be p r epared suggest i ng an alternative to t he proposed regulation change which would be more equit~ble and still accomplish the results desired by the State Boa r d . Th e Districts ' Executive Committee has r eques t ed that the· staff prepa re a repo r t for the Boar ds on this matte r t o be presented at Wednesday 's mee ting . Di s t r i ct No . ii No . 25 -Approving Grant of Easement to Southern Califor nia Edison Company re: Newland -Hamilton Pump Station Site -The s t aff recommends that an easement be granted to the Southern California Ed i son Company to install underground uti l ities beh i nd the cur b line of the improved st r eet at the Di strict 's Newla n d -Ham ilton Pump Stati on site . The grant of this easement · will insure that in the even t i mprovements or additions are ma de at the pump station which conflict with the Edison Company 's u tilities , they will be r elocated at no cost to the District . Di st r icts Nos . 5 a n d 6 No . 3 0 -Ove r s izing Pac i f i c Co a st Highway Sewer Cr oss i ng to Serve Hoag Hospital and Sur rolLnding Area ,-In June of this yea r , the Boards of Distri cts Nos . 5 and 6 authori zed the negot i at i on of an agreement fo r the oversizing of a Coast Hi ghway Sewe r crossing in connect i on with replacement of a -3- portion of the Di stricts ' Trunk A in the Coast Highway . If an agreement can be conswnmated, a distinct savings can be realized by the Di stricts inasmuch as we would be paying only for the oversizing of the sewer . The proposed construction i s contemplated to be done by the contractor for the Districts ' Contract No . 5 -19, which is presently under construction . The work involves the installation of 350 feet of 24-inch pipe , 80 feet of which must be jacked under the Coast Highway . The Change Order totals approximately $3 2,000 . The Districts ' share would amount to approximately $12,000 , with Dist rict No . 5 paying 87% and District No . 6 13%. The entire matte r is pending a decision of Hoag Hospital officials . Hopefully, this will be resolved by Wednesday 's Board meeting . District No . 6 No . 35 -November 8th Joint Meeting Agenda Items -At the November 8th meeting of the Joint Boards , District No . 6 Directors were unable to act on Joint items because of the lack of a quorum . It is recommended that the action appearing on the agenda be approved which covers the Joint meeting items that weie approved by the other Sanitation Districts on Novembe r 8th . District No . 2 No . 39 -Status Report on Anaheim Hills Annexation -To date, the proponents of this annexation have not returned executed copies of the agreements autho r ized by the Board ; there fore , this annexation has not been finalized . If the annexation fees, or in this case the executed agreements, are not submitted to the District by December 29th, the annexation fees wi ll i ncrease . Attached to the agenda are copies of letters to the proponents advising them of this situation . No . 40 -Emp l oyment of Appraiser for Contract No . 2 -14 - Included in the agenda material is a letter from the General Counsel recommending the emp loyment of Everett S . Schmid as appraiser for the District in the acquisition of rights of way for the construction of Contract No . 2 -14 . Mr . Schmid 's per diem rate is $15 .00 per hour . No . 41 -Change Order to Contract No . 2 -14-1, Santa Ana . River Interceptor, Sully-Mill e r Cont racting Company , Cont ractor . This Change Order has been requ ested by the contrac tor to increase the s i ze of the lined concrete pipe from 72 -inch to 78 -inch at no additional cost to the District . It is the staf f 's recommendation that the Change Order be approved . No . 44 -Adjournment -It is recommended that the Board adjourn to 7:30 p .m., December 20th, which is the date selected by the Board to conduct public hearings on the proposed Connect i on Charge Ordinance (Ordinance No . 203). -4- ... -. Di strict No . 7 Nos . 45 , 46 and 47 -Annexations Nos . 26, 27, and 30 -The fees have been r ecei ved on these pending annexations which have been previously approved by the Board of Directors . It i s r ecommended that resolution s be adopted to complete the annexa - tion proceedings . No •. 48 -Status Report on Proposed Annexati on No . 28 , Tract No . 7389 -The proponents of th i s annexation have not submitted the fees to complete this proposed annexation to the Di s trict . Enclos ed for the Directors ' information is a copy of a letter from the District to the p r oponent , advising that the annexation fees will increase on January 1, 1 973 . District No . 3 No . 52 -Addendum No. 1 t o Contract No . 3 -17 -1 Bolsa Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 1 , an Bolsa Avenue S orn Drain ·o r e Ci y of Westminster) -This cont ract provides for the con s truction of a 33 -inch sewer in Bolsa Avenue from NewlR-nd to Magnolia in the Ci ty of W e stm~nste r. In addition , the contracto r will install , as a part of the contract , a storm drain for the City of Westminste r . The contract will be admini stered by Distri ct No . 3 o This adde ndum i s mere ly a clarification of ASTM spec i f i - cations . No . 54 -Further Consideration of Routing of Knott Inte r ceptor . At a special meeting of the District Board on Decemb er 7 , the action concerning the routing of the Knott Interceptor, Re ach 4, Contract No . 3 -18 through the City of Westminste r was deferred to December 1 3 pending i nvestigation of a possible r oute adjacent to the Southern Pac i f ic railroad tracks in the vicinity of Hoover and Haza r d Avenues . The engineers have been di r ected to analyze and prepare an es timate for this newly-suggested route f or the Board 's conside ration. No . 55 -Adjournment -It is recommended that the Board adjourn to Janua r y 3rd which i s the time specified for a publ i c h earing on the Di strict 's proposed Connection Charge Ordinance (Ordina nc e No . 303). FAH:j F red A . Harper Ge neral Manager MEETING DATE Dec . 13 , 197 2 TIME 7:30 p .m. DI STRICTS 1 ,2 ,3 ,5 .6 ,7 & 11 DISTRICT 1 (HERRIN) ••••• (CASPERS) •••• (wc:1 cu) , ....... "". '" ..... . DISTRICT 2 lPEREZ) •• • •• • ~~NGER) ••••• l KO\'/ALS ['1 ) ••• GR I SET)····· HOLLIND~N) •• ROBERTS) • • • • !CASPERS) •••• REINHARDT) •• DUTTON) ••••• (CASTRO) • • • • • (DUNNE) •••••• DISTRICT 3 ACTIVE DIRECTORS GRISET· • • • • / ---- BATTIN ••••• ~ ___ _ MILLER ••••• PORTER • • • • • ~ == == SM I TH • • • • • • __JL__ ----CULVER • • • • • _!::::::::... __ __ F I N NELL • • • • _::::::::::__ __ __ FOX •••• •••• ~ ---- HERRIN .····· ~ ---- JUST ••••••• ~ ---- ~ ---- ....J.::::::::: ---- ~ ---- ~---- ~---­ ~---- CULVER. • • • • V-___ _ (CASPE~S) •••• BATTIN ••••• ~ ---- !HINES) •. ) •••• DAVIS •••••• ~ ___ _ KOWAl,.S KI • • • FOX • • • • • • • • --io::::::::. __ _ COEN) ••••••• GREEN • • • • • • ~ ___ _ lGRISET) • • ••• HERRIN ••••• -~--__ FRANKi EWICH). LACAYO····.· .,,/ ---- NU I JENS)···· LEW.IS······ ~ --- MILLER) • • • • • LONG······· ~ ---- MC WHINNEY. ~----· REINHARDT) •• ROOT ••••••• _L --__ BLACKMAN) •••• SALES...... 7 --- HOLLI NPEN). •• SCOTT •••• •· _____ _ DUTTON) •••••• STEPHENSON • _LL_ ___ _ ROBERTS) ••••• STEVENS •••• --5 _-_-BYRNE~ •••••• VANDERWAAL. DISTRICT 5 JOINT BO AR DS ACTIVE DIRECTORS LANGER •••••• FIN NELL.. • • • ~ . CASPE RS) •••• BA KER....... ~ --. ,...11snr-n"' T'\"T......... ---- '""'"' rL.f\.:>1 •••• OM 1 11'l •••••• ~ __ CASPERS • • • • • o....- (CASPERS) •••• CLARK • • • • • • • .,,/ --. ----CULVER • • • . • • ,-.-__ !HINES) ••••••• DAVIS ....... ~-- COEN) •••••••• DUKE ••• ••••• ~-- KOWAt,.S KI ). • • • FOX ••••••••• ~ __ (COEN) ........ GIBBS ....... ~ __ (COEN)~ ••••••• GREEN • • • • • • • ~ --- (HERRIN) •••••• GR I SET • • • • • • V----- (GRIS ET). • • • • • HERRIN • • • • • • ;::::::::----- (HOLL I NDEN) ••• JUST •••••••• ~ __ (MC INNIS). • • • KYM LA • • • • • • • ~-­ (FRANK I EW I cH). LACAYO······~ -- !NU I JENS).· •• • LEWIS • • · • • • • ~ -- MILLER) •••••• LONG •••••••• ~-- CROUL) ••••••• ttii lflfl IS •••• ---- MC WH I NNEY •• _.i.:::::::_ -- (WELSH) ••••••• MILLER •••••• ~ -- (ROBERTS) ••••• NEVIL.······~ -- (CASPERS) ••••• PH I LL I PS • • • • v----- p 0 RTE R • • • • • • _i-::::::: -- (FIS C HB AC ti) ••• QUIGLEY ••.•• ~ -- (MC INN I SJ •••• ROGERS • • • • • • ~ __ (REINHARDT).·· ROOT········ ~ -- (BLACKMAN) • • • SALES • • • • • • • ~-- (HOLLI NDEN). • • SCOTT • • • • • • • _:::::::= -- (PEREZ) ••••.•• SM I TH • • .. • • • i-.---- (DUTTON) •••••• STEPHENSON •• _lk_ -- (ROBERTS) ••••• STEVENS · • · • • ~ -- (MC INNIS) •••• STORE •... ••• ~ -- (BYRNE) ••••••• VANDERWAAL •• ~ -- (CASTRO).·· • • • Hl!!D:U1 • • • • • • • ~-­ (DUNNE) • • • • • • WINN • • • • • • • • --· -- - * * * * * ) ~ (JOHNSON) CROUL •••••.• MO ?ififMI G ••• _!:__ ----BOYD········ --- MITCHELL···· -·---· BAKER) ••••••• G/,IFE~ • • . . ~ --- ~'.~~,c:N:,~_; · · v--__ --OTHERS DISTRICT 6 PORTER • • • • • v------- (PH I LL I PS)··· GAMEftS • • • • i----'_,...., _- (MC INNIS) •• • STORE······ i------ 'DISTRICT 7 (WELSH) •••••• MILLER····· ~ ---- (CASPERS) • • • • CLARK • • • • • • ~ (HERRIN) • • .. • GR I SET ····· ~ -== ·/ PORTER •. · · · v ---- !FI SCHBACti ) ••• QUIGLEY •• V? / ---- MC INNIS) •••• ROGERS ••••• ~ --- PJ::REZ) •••••• SMITH ...... ~---- DTSTR I CT 11 (COEN) ....... GIBBS ...... ---LL. ---- (cASP~RS) • • • • BAKER • • • • • • ._.......------ (COEN) • • • • • • • DUKE • • • • • • • ~---- DISTRICT 8· (JOHNSQN ). • • · • BOYD • • • • • • • (CLARK) ••••••• CASPERS • • • • ) MITCHELL .··· l?/1/7? HARPER ~-K~-c\>t\ BROWN SYLVESTER ~ LEWIS DUNN CLARKE SIGLER NISSON TAYLOR BROWN BOETTNER CARLSON FINSTER GALLOWAY HOHENER HOWARD HUNT KEITH LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON MURO NEY PIERSALL STEVENS .KENNEY ME ET I NG DATE Dec, 13 , 1 9 7 2 TI ME 7 :3 0 p .m. DI STR ICT S 1,2 ,3,5,6 ,7 & 11 DI ST RIC T 1 (HERR IN) • · · · · (C AS PERS) •••• (WEL S H) •••.•• DI STRICT 2 (PEREZ) • • • • • • ~ .NGER) ..... (KO WALSt<I) ••• (GR I S ET) ••••• (HOLLI NDf:N) .• (RO BE RTS) • • • • (C AS PERS) •••• (R E I NHARDT) .• (DUTTON) ••••• (CASTRO) •• · • • (DUNNE) •••••• DISTRICT 3 (CAS P ERS) •••• iHINE S ) ...... KOY.!Al-S KI) ••• COEN) ••.•••• (GR I SET) ..••• (FRAN K I EW I CH). (NU I JE NS)···· (MILLER)·.··· ACTIVE DIRECTORS GR I S ET · .. ·· --::? ---- BA TTI N ••••• ~-___ _ MILLER ..••• -r ___ _ PORTER • • • • • _____ _ SM I TH· • · · • • CULVER ••• • • FINNELL .••• FO X •• · · • · · • HERRIN····· JUST •. • . • • • NEV IL • • • • • • PHILLIPS .•• ROOT ••••.•• STEPH ENSON. WEDAI\ •••. • • WINN ....... ,/ -r---- -y----- ..... _/ ____ _ ~---- o/ -./-----------/ -;r -----:r----r---- ,/ CULVER ..... ______ _ BATTIN ••.•• _!__ ___ -- DAVIS •.•••• -7-___ _ FOX . . . . . . . . ______ _ GREEN ••...•. -7-___ _ HE RRIN·····------- LACA YO • · • • • _./_ ----LE W I S ...... _./ ____ _ LONG • • • • • · • _./_ ---- MC WHINNEY • --5----- (REI NHARDT) •. RO OT •••••.. __ ---- (BLA CKMAN ) .••• SALE S •••.•. _.; ____ _ (H OLLI ND EN ) ••• SCOTT ••••.• _./ ____ _ (DUT TO N) •..••• STEPHENSON. -7 _. __ _ (RO BE RTS) .•••. STEVE NS •.•• -T ____ _ (BY RN E) .•.•.•• VANDER WAAL . _____ _ DIST RICT 5 / -r-- JOINT BOAR DS ACTIVE DIRECTORS LAN GER ..•.••. FI NN ELL •• ; .• ~ _·_ CA S P ERS ) .... BAK ER....... ./ CASPER S ) •••• BATTIN •••••• ~;;--- CA S PERS ••••• ~ -- (C ASPERS) •••• CL ARK ••.•••• -y --. ---::;; --CULVER •.•.•• ____ _ iHINES) ••••••• DAVIS •••..•• ~ __ COEN) ........ DU KE ........ ____::__ __ KOWAL S KI) •••• FO X .•••.••.• _:::..._ __ (COEN) •••••••• GI BBS • • • • • • • v (co_EN). ·~· ..... GREEN .. . • .. • ~ == (HERRI N •••.•• GR I S ET •• · ••.• ---- (GR I SET .••••• HE RR IN • •• • · · _v' __ _ (HOLLI NDE N) ••• JU ST ••• • •••• _/ __ _ (MC IN NIS).··· KY MLA • • • • • • • _:L_ -- (FRANKIEWICW· LAC AYO······ _v_ --· ~NU I JEN S ) .• • • • LE W I S • • • • • • • _L --~MILLE R) ...... LO NG ........ + __ ~CROUL) ••••••• M' INNIS •••• ---- MC WH I NNEY •• _L_ -- (WELSH) ••••••. MILLER ....•• ___L_ -- (ROBERTS) ••••. NEV IL .•.••• • ___L_ -- (CASPERS) ••••• PHILLIPS··.·~ -- PORTER ..•••• __L __ (FISCHB ACti). • • QUIGLEY·····~ -- (MC INNIS).··· ROGERS······ ~ __ (RE I NHA RDT). • · ROOT • • • · • • • • ~ -- (BLACK MAN ) • • • SALES • • · • • · • _L -- (HOLL I ND EN). • • SCOTT • · • • • • • ./ -- (PERE Z) ....... SMIT H ........ '! -- (DUTTON ) .•..•• STEPHENSON •• --=::::__ -- (RO B ERTS) .•••• STE VE NS ...•• _iL_ -- (MC IN ~ I S ) .••• ST OR E ••••••• ---G---(B YRl~E, ••.•••• VA NDERW AAL •• ___ _ (CASTRO ).····· W.e-&A1\· • • • • • • _L -- (DU NNE)· .... • WIN N ........ _L --- * * * * * (JOHN SON) BOYD········ ---- MIT CHELL···· ---- ( CR OU L ). • • • • . • t4C---Htttt"S . . • (BAKER) .•.•••• C/\~PE!RS-; ••• KYMLA •••••• DISTRICT 6 PORTER • • • • · (PHILLIP S ) • • • ~ · • • (MC I NN IS).·· STORE······ -r-- ---~tHHER~ / ·J~ ~ -7--- -r4ku;f' HAR P ER ~'i'lN SYL VESTER LE WIS DU NN CL ARK E SIGLER NI SSO N TA YLOR ~---- DISTRICT 7 (}ff LSH) ...... MILLER ····· -+ ---- (C AS PER S ) • • • • CL ARK ······ ------ (HE RRIN ) · • · · · GR I S ET · • • • • __.:!_ ---- PO RTER •• 'frdi + -- - (FI SC HBA Cti ) ••• QUIGLE Y . Jlq . ------- (MC JNNIS) •••• RO GERS ••••• ~ ---- (PE REZ ) ...... SM ITH ...... __'{_ __ -- D TR ICT 11 l COEN) ....... GI BBS ...... -~ ---- ~C ASP ~R S) • · • • BAK ER · • • · • • -y-----. l COEN) • • . • · · • DUKE · • · · • • · ------ DI STRIC T 8 CJOH NSQ N ) .•... BOY D ••.••.• (CLARK ) .•.••.• CASPERS · · • • MI TCHEL L • • · J.2 /1/7 2 ~~ BO ETTNER CA RLSON FI NS TE R GA LLOWAY HOHENER HOWARD HU NT KEI TH LYNCH MAD DOX MARTINSON MU RONEY PI ERSA LL STEVEN S (J KEt rnEY JliP-(J~~ -/ -.. 11·~ BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 8127 IOE\Lt4 Ellis Av2nu~ Fountain Vailey, Calif., 92708 of Orange County, California I II II (1) (2) (3) FILE ·······-··--(-4 ) LETIER ············- A/C •.•• TKlR 4\J\ \ S .. -·--··-·········- -----·····---- (5) f\\ \ s t.LI. ·-······· .. ···· LETIER •••••••••••.•• A/C •••• TKLR •••• _ --···--@) --·;:;ff··:::::: ...... . LETIER ············@ A/C •••• TKLR •••• !) F.L~:~ I. .R ··•··••··••··· ~ •••• TKLR •••• (0 \ .,,' J ..._..._.. ______ _ (10) JOINT BOARDS Final AG E N D A 12/13/72 ./ ADJOURNMENTS ...... ~ - COMP & MILEAGE •• ~ December 13, 1972 -7:30 p.m. FILES SET UP .................. - RESOLUTIONS CERTIFIED.Y.' LEHERS WRITTEN .......... .- MINUTES WRITIEN ......... .- Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation MINUTES flLED ............. _. Roll Call Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary v~&.. -100 S DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from City of Villa Park r·egarding appointment of Robert R. Dunne as alternate Director on the Board of District No. 2 EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions appr·oving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: Distrtct l District 2 District 3 District 5 District 6 District 7 Distrtct 11 ALL DIS'I'I~ICTS Nove~ber 8, 1972 regular) November 16, 1972 adjourned and November 21, 1972 adjourned November 8, 1972 regular November 8, 1972 regular and December 7, 1972 special (Copy t<f~~) in Directors' meeting folders) November 8, 1972 regul&.r October 11, 1972 regular and November 8 ) 1972 regular November 8, 1972 regular November 8, 1972 regular Report of the Joint Chairman ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager ALL DISTF.ICTS Report of the General Counsel ALL DISTRIC'I'S Consideration of motion to convene in executive session re personnel matters <2'-t5 ALL DISTRIC'l'S Consideration of motion to reconvene in regular session q:s~ (11) ALL DISTRICTS Action on items considered in executive session: FILE ···············-· (a) CO{isider~ion of actio~s re meet an~_confer personnel 'Se_ssions · LETTER ••.••••••••••• A/C ••.• TKLR •••• ( b ) .......................... fV\ \ s Consideration of Resolution No. 72-160, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 71-3, as amended ·itE ············t12) ALL DISTRICTS ~TTER •...•• :_..... Report of the Executive and Building Committees and A<~-~-~TKLR ····f'v\ \ s consideration of motion to receive and file the Committees' ···-··-········-······-written report dated December 8, 1972 ---.............................. . (13) ALL DISTRICTS * * * * * * * * * * * CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions · included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered separately in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. f,Lf ········•····••••• LETTER ···-·······( a ) A/C •... TKLR •••• Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6, to the plans and specifications for Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-·8, authorizing an addition of $8,682.17 to the contract with Kordick & Rados, a Joint Venture. See page "D" --- ----------·-·-- (b) f,Lf .................• (LEITER ····~-- ~--_,,.,,,,. A/C .... TKLR •••• FILE .••••.•••••••••••• --/ ~TT~R •••••••••••••• A/C •••• TKLR •••• Consideration of motion to receive, file, deny and refer to contractor, the following claims for alleged damages in connection with construction of Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8, as recommended by the General Counsel: Claim submitted by Mr. & Mrs. Henry Gomez, dated November 22, 1972, in the amount of $3,057.36. See page ''E" Claim submitted by City of Fountain Valley, dated November 16, 1972, in the amount of $2,010.14. See page 11 F" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 3) -2- ,. .. . (13) CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) (c) Consideration of motion ratifying attendance of General Manager at the 1972 Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments Worksho~ in Detroit, PILE •.•••.•.....•••.•• LETTER •••.••.•...••• A/C •... TKLR •••• :::L£1.±::... Michigan, on December 12th; and approving reimburse- ment of transportation, lodging, meals and incidental expenses incurred, as recommended by the Executive Committee ------···--·--· FILE ···-····_(SJ:_) ~ei· ~~~:~.':-~­ Ate--.TKLR •••• Consideration of Resolution No. 72-161, awarding purchase contract for Supplying Chlorine in One Ton Cylinders, Specification No. C-005, to Georgia-Pacific Corporat~on in. the amount of $112.70 unit price per --ton. See page "G" --·- (e) Consideration of motion to receive and fil~ bid tabulations and recommendations, and awarding purchase of the following: FiLE:s. _____ ._... Specification No. E-066 for One ( 1) Engine (J._~~ .... u:.: .. -~Analyzing Equipment Unit Designed Specifically we-.... TKLR •••• JrlP"'., for Engine Diagnosis, to Sun Electric Corpora ti on ~ . c .' s .....--;~ in the air..o un t of $ 4 , 3 2 6 . 0 0 . See page "H" Specification No. A-063 for Six (6) 4-Wheel ~Electric Cars, to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing )I'~· Company in the amount of $9,032.63. See page II I" Specification No. A-064 for One (1) 1/2-Ton ~ Plckup Truck, to International Harvester Company -~ ' in the amount of $2, 940. 00. See page 11 J" Specification No. A-065 for Three (3) 1-Ton ~?Flat Bed Trucks, to Santa Ana Dodge, Inc. in the amount of $10,499.05. See page "K" ----- Specification No. A-066 for Four (4) 1-Ton Cab · -~and Chassis, to International Harvester Company ~ in the amount of $12, 030. 00. See page "L" Specification No. A-067 for One (1) 16,ooo lb. ~/GVW Truck With Articulated Hydraulic Crane, to Santa Ana Dodge, Inc. in the amount of $10,599.75. See page "M" FILE ·············(T) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager LETTER···-········· to issue purchase order to Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc. we _TKLR --· ~if or acquisition of 24 improved replacement cylinder . ~.o. ~ heads and manifold assemblies, for a net trade-in price not to exceed $8,ooo.oo plus tax and freight. See page "N" (14) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any :E~-~=5~ ALL DISTRICTS ~ Report and recommendation of General Counsel re affect of Conservation Act) "O" at Plant No. 2 ~-~~~\\S LETTER ·······""'" recently passed Proposition 20 (Coastal Zone on award of Job No. P2-21, Digesters "N" and ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing the Districts to enter into a joint statement with other sewering agencies, opposing the proposed amendment tQ Section 2144 of the Clean Water Grant Program which would have the effect of limiting Sta·te and Federal construction grant aid for wastewater projects situaten. in 11 critical air arcc.s," to a capaclty le\~e1 tc ·::;et existing needs plus five years of growth. -3- (17) (18) M\> ·( 19) (20) FILE ------ lETTER ·····--nj l S A/C _ •• TKLR •••• ~21) ~22) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file certification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recom."!lends authorization for payment ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving warrant books for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing payment of claims listed on page "A" ALL:=:RI S TRI C'I'~ Other, business and co~nicat-1:.ons, if any DISTRICT 1 Consideration of Resolution No. 72-162-1, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Digesters "N" and "O" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-21, to Hemisphere Constructors, Inc. in the amount of $1,068,413.00. See pages "Q" and "P" ---rt /7 .Q; or-~~ DI8'±'RIC'r8 1 & 7 -Consideration of motion approving suspense ¥ttn<i--war~ants, 'if any • Bee pase "C" DI8TRICT 1 Genaifiera:tien of metien approving tral'. t a11t~, if any . Sec page "B" ( 23) nr-grRICT 1 . · 0th~ ... busine~_ and comm~cations "~-any (24) DISTRICT 1 (25) FILE-···--·- LETTER ···-··-···f'J\ \ s A/C __ TKLR •••• ..,.~~~/ r- (26) ['."\ \ <.> N\\ c,. ~27) (28) (29) M\~ Consideration of motion to adjourn 10'1 f1 DISTRICT 11 Consideration of Resolution No. 72-163-11~ authorizing execution of Grant of Easement to Southern Californ~a Edison Company to accornodate street improvements by the City of Huntington Beach in Newland Avenue . See page '1 Q" DISTRICTS 3 & lJ_ Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants~ if any. See page 11 B" DI8'J?RIGT 11 Oonaificration of motion approvlng warrants, i-f-a-n-y. Sec page "C" WSTRICT N Obher busi'rtess and c~icatio~ if any \-0'. , .. '! DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn \~~\1 (30) DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Consideration of items re oversizing Pacific Coast Highway {\J\ \ s Sewer crossing to serve Hoag Hospital and surrounding area FILE -~"···--·· · LETTER ···--·-···( a ) A/C •••• TKLR -~ ~t3 .. ~ r- FILE ··············--' b) LEITER •••••••••••••• A/C _ .. TKLR •••. Consideration of Resolution No. 72-166, authorizing execution of agreement with Hoag Hospital for over- sizing Pacific Coast Highway Sewer crossing in connection with replacement of a portion of Newport Beach ':L1runk A. See page "R'; Consideration of motion appr·ovinf.S Change Order No. _J_ to the plans and specifjcations for Sewer ·rrt~nk "B" -- rr :i.t 8 -Pacific Coast Hl-::1 .. way Force Main) Cont Fact No. 5-19, to j_mplement agreement with Hoag Hospital (Copy in Directors' meeting folders) -4- (32) N\\ ~) (33) (34) DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants, if any. See page "B" DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "B" DY RICT 5 _ 0th r busine~_and commun1~.~:_tions, ~any DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn 10".\8 FILE ···-············· ( 35) DISTRICT 6 LETIER ·••••••••••••• Consideration of motion approving all i terns of joint business A/~---·TKLR •••. N\\ s at the November 8, 1972 meeting, not acted upon by District ~ j\~~~: No. 6 because of lack of quorum. See page "S" -----·---···· ·( 36) DIS'3?RIOCfl 6 -Consideration of motion apfH?-e:v:.ing--~warrantsT·-4.f-an~. See pa.go "G !!.... (37) D~T6 Other busines~d communica~s, if aby (38) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of rr.otion to adjourn \ 0\ \<\ FILE --····-··-·-~ LETIER ··---{-f 39 ).i .DISTRIC'l1 2 A/C-~KLR~ Status report re Proposed Annexation No. 6 -Anaheim Hills 'v J..µcr~ it.Ii"' "' t • l'T 1 S " " ~~~ .... 1lnnexa ·ion .~o. . ee page T '--···· (40) F_ILE(---\.· =~,,/i\l' 'A)~\-~ ~9····---······· A/C _TI<LR •••• FILE ··········~····· ·~~\S A/C •••. TKL -· ---·····- r;.._----~--·· FILE~-~ ( LETTER5···~······· A7c-::TKLR •... ~ .. ~~ .. -:.:. ~~s DISTRICT ·2 Consideration of motion authorizing employment of Everett S. Schmid for right of way appraisal services in connection with right of way acquisition for County Sanitation District No. 2 re Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No. 2-14, at a per diem rasa of $15.00 per hour for a total amount not to exceed i~;~28~QG' as recommended by the General Counsel. See page 11 U" DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2, to the plans and specifications for the Santa Ana River Interceptor, From Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, authorizing an increase in pipe size from 72 inches to 78 inches to the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting Compan;y, at no cost to the District. See page "V1' DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "B" DISTRICT 2 Other business and co~munications, if any (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file communications regarding hearings in connection with proposed connection charges c;::::-, DISTRICT 2 ~ Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., December 20, 1972 \0 · .. d.lc __....... .... -...... ... DIS 1rRIC'l1 '/ Consideration of Resolution No. 72-111-7, ordering an~exation of territory to the District (Proposed Annexation No. 26 - Santiar;'-Boulevard A~nexation to :aunty Sardtation Distri_ t No. 7) Se2 page 11 W'' --- -·5- ... ' ~~} DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from H. Lawson Mead> Attorney At Law, dated November 13, 1972, FILE -·····~~~~;..'._ requesting final approval of Proposed .1-"..nnexation No. 2' on ~ behalf of the proponents of said annexation; and considera- A/C r:; tion of Resolution No. 72-51-7> orC.ering annexation of •••• TKLRJ r territory to the District (Proposed Annexation No. 27 - -·-····-··-Mead Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). See ----· pages "X" and "Y" 'Ll'--\tvu...-R.. -b, 'T'~ 3 <l..k'/ · "0 ::;:::i..,J. ~ (-47J--DISTRICT 7 ~-r:b'v7-Consideration of Resolution No. 72-165-7, ordering annexation .TKLR .•.. ~ \c of territory to the Dist~ict (Pro~ose~ Anr:exation No. 30 -~-~~1 1\ ::J Tract 6232 to County Sanitation District No. 7) See page 11 Z" FILE -( i.!±.8 ) __ -DISTRICT 7 ~ -Status report re Proposed Annexation No. 28 -Tract No. 7389 LETTER •••...•.....•• -- C (Estate of Marion E. Jones) to County Sanitation District A/C _TKLR .. Y '-+Jt9) fV\ \ s. (50) (51) flU (52) LETTER ···-··--~ -.. naa\:l. \ S, /~~~ r;__ _____ .. (55) FILE ·-····-········· lETl'ER>~--1 Ate .... rKLR .Jv\ 1 s ~~-~-< ..... . (56) fif\\rs No. 7. See page "AA" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "C" DI§TRICT 7 --~ Ot~ busines~~nd corrun~cations0-if any DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~ ,..~ ~a-'~ f: 3 o IO',<-/(_ DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Balsa Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 10, Contract No. 3-17-1,for County Sanitation District No. 3 and Balsa Avenue Storm Drain for the City of Westminster. See page "BB" DISTRICT 3 Further consideration of routing of Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18, through the City of Westminster, deferred from special meeting of December 7, 1972 DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "B" DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications, if any (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file comJnunications regarding hearings.in connection with proposed connections charges DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., January 3, 1973. \O ·. 53 -6- II ;· BOARDS OF D~RECTORS II County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P. 0. Box 8J.27 10844 Ellis /\•1enu~ Fountain Vailey, Cr>lif., 92708 J0/1'/T BOARDS December 13 2 1972 -7:30 o.m. Final A G EN D A 12/13/72 (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation ( 2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary ~ ( 4) DIS'I1RICT 2 Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from City of Villa Park regarding appointment of Robert R. Dunne as alternate Director on the Board of District No. 2 (5) · EACH DISTRICT (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 District 2 District 3 District 5 District 6 District 7 November 8, 1972 regular, November 16, 1972 adjourned and November 21, 1972 adjourned November 8, 1972 regular November 8, 1972 regular and December 7, 1972 special (Copy in Directors 1 meeting folders) November 8, 1972 regular October 11, 1972 regular and NovembeP 8' 19'72 regular November 8, 1972 regular District 11 November 8, 1972 regular ALL DIS'I1RIC 1TS (~ vJJ 1) ; Report of the Joint Chairman , ~J flJ -· A Ah .. ,., ""'~ ALL DISTRICTS /J Jj (l)AA~v:J_'().J/l.j~6··· Ji ~ Report of the General Manager --r0 ~ / ) JIV""""-j ~ _J ~ ~ ~~ ~ .-,~· r- ALL DIS'IRICTS · . ''~ --;~ ~!i--- Report of the General Courisel "1 , ~, ~~~~ "° 5f1~-~, ALL DISTRICTS c:;;f~ ~ .,~ ef-P'r Consideration o~ motio~ to convene i ex~&u 'ti: ses~ion re personnel mai:;ters 8 ,11 ALL DIS~.'RICTS ~~ Consideration of motion to reconvene in regular se~>sion 9,,'r~ .. (11) ALL DISTRICTS Action on items considered in executive session: (a) Consideration of actions re meet and confer personnel sessions f~ Consideration of Resolution No. 72-160, amending ~, Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 71-3, as amended (12) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive and Building Corrunittees and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committees' written report dated December 8, 1972 (13) ALL DISTRICTS * * * * * * * * * * * CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered separately in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6, to the plans and specifications for Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8, authorizing an addition of $8,682.17 to the contract with Kordick & Rados, a Joint Venture. See page "D" (b) Consideration of motion to receive, file, deny and refer to contractor, the following claims for alleged damages in connection with construction of Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8, as recommended by the General Counsel: Claim submitted by Mr. & Mrs. Henry Gomez, dated November 22, 1972, in the amount of $3,057.36. See page "E" Claim submitted by City of Fountain Valley, dated November 16, 1972, in the amount of $2J010.14. See page "F" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 3) -2-· (13) CONSENT CALENDAR (Co n tinued ) (c ) (d ) (e ) (f) rq?'..4 g Consideration of motion ratifying attenda nce of Gen e ral Manager at the 1972 Fed e ral Water Pollution Control Act Amendments Workshop, in Detroit , Michigan , on Decem ber 12th ; and approving reimburse - ment of transportation, lodging , meals and incidental expenses incurred , as recommended by the Execut i ve Comini ttee Consideration of Resol u t i on No. 72 -16 1 , awardi ng purchase contract for Supplying Ch l orine in One Ton Cylinde r s, Spec i fication No . C-005 , to Georgia-Paci f i c Corporat~on in the amount of $112 .70 u nit price pe r ton . See page 11 G" Co n sideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulations and rec ommend ation s , and awarding purchase of the following :/ Spec i fication No. E-066 for One (1 ) Engine Analyzing Equipment Unit Designed Specifically f or Engine Diagnosis , to Sun Electric Corporation in t h e amount of $ 4 , 326 . 00. See page 11 H11 Spec i fication No . A-063 for Six (6 ) 4-Wheel Ele c tric Cars, to Taylor-Dunn Ma nufacturing Company in the amount of $9,032.63. See page 11 I 11 Spec i ficati on No. A-06 {for One (1 ) 1/2-Ton Pickup Truck , to International Harvester Company in the amo unt of $2,940.00 . See page nJ 11 Sp e cification No . A-06 ~or Three (3) 1-Ton Flat Bed Trucks , to Santa Ana Dodge , Inc . in the amount of $10, 499 . 05 . See page 11K11 Specif1cation No . A-067ror Four ( 4) 1-Ton Cab and Chassis, to In ternational Harve ster Company i n the amount of $12, 030. 00 . See page 11 Ln Specification No . A-067vf'."or' One (1) 16 ,00 0 lb. GVW Truck With Articulated Hydraulic Crane, to Santa A'.na Dodge, Inc. in the amount of $10, 599. 75 . See page n wr Consideration of motion a uthori zing the Gene r al Manager t o i ssue purchase ord e r to Wauk es ha Engine Servicenter, Inc . for acquisition of 24 impro v e d r e plac e ment cylinder heads and manifold ass e mblies , fo r a net trade-in price not to exceed $8 ,ooo.oo plus tax and frei gh t . See page t 1 N 11 (14 ) ALL DISTRICTS (1 5) 1)1rxV (1 6 ) Cons idera.tion of items deleted from consent calendar , if any ALL DI STRICTS Re port a nd r e corrri1e ndati o n of General Co uns el r e affec t of r e cent ly pass e d Prop os it i on 2 0 (Co as t al Zone Conse rva tio n Act) on aw ard of Job No . P2 -21 , Digesters 11 N 11 and 11 0 11 a t Pl a nt No. 2 ALL DI STR I CTS Con s i de r at i o n o f mo t1 o n a u t h ori z ing t h e Di s trict s t o en ter into a j o i nt s tat ement wi th o th e r sewe ri ng agen cies, o pposing the prop o se d amendme n t t o Section 21 44 of the Cl ean Water Gr ant Pr ogram wh ic h wo u ld have the effect of l i miti n g State a n d Fed e ra l con stru ct i on gran t ai d for wast e water pro j ec t s s i t u ate ,~ i n 11 cri t ical a i r a.reas , 11 t o a cap acit y leve l to -.'e c t ex is ti ng n ee d s plu s fiv e y ear s o f gro wth. -3- (17) ALL DISTR ICTS Con s ideration of motion to r e ceiv e a nd fi le certi fi c at ion of the Gener a l Ma nager that h e h as check ed a ll bills appearing on the agenda, found th em to b e in order , and that he r ecomme nds authorization for paym e nt (18 ) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of rol l cal l vote motion approving Joint Operati n g and Capital Outlay Revolving warrant books fo r s i gnature of the Chairman of District No . 1, and autho ri z ing payment o f claims li sted o n page "A11 (1 9) ALL DISTRICTS Ot h er business an d c ommunications , if a ny l~Qonside r ation of Resolution No . 72 -162-1 , to receive and fil e (~O) DI STRICT 1 · ~J/bi d tabu l ation and r e comm endation, and awarding contract f or Digesters 11 N 11 a nd 11 0 11 at Plant No . 2, J ob No . P2 -21 , to ,}~/H emisphere Con structors , Inc . in the amount of $1 ,068 ,413.00 . iY I\\[/ See pages 11 011 and 11 P " D, \'J (21 J DI 8TRIGT8 1 & 1 Consideration of mot ion approv i ng suspense fund warrantg , if any . See ps.gc 11 8 11 E 2 2 ) DISCJ?R±cm l Consideration of mo t ion app roving wa rr ant s, i f a n y . S ee page "B'' (2 3) DISTRICT 1 Other business and com mu nications, if any (24) DISTRI CT 1 ~25) (2 6 ) {27) Con side ration of motion to ·adjourn DISTRICT 1 1 Consideration of Resolution No . 72 -163-11, authorizing execution of Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company to accomodate stree t improveme nts by the City of Hunt i ngton Beach i n Newland Av e nue . Se e page nQ" DISTRICTS 3 & 1 1 Consi de ration of motion approving suspens e fund warrant s, i f any . See page "B11 DISTR I CT 11 Gonsidcr~tion of Motion app r ovi ng warrants , i f any. -&cc pe:gc !I G 11 (28 ) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communi c a t ions, if a n y (29 ) DISTRICT 11 Conside ration of motion to adjourn (3 0 ) DISTRI CT S 5 & 6 Consi de ration of i tems re ove r s izing Pacific Coast Highwa y Sewer crossing to serve Hoag Hospital and surroun d in g area (a ) Consideration of Resolution No . 72 -1 66 , authorizing exe c u tion of agreement with Hoag Hospital for over - sizing Paci fic Coast Hi ghway Sewer crossing in conn ection with replacement of a por ~io n o f Newpo rt Beac h Trunk A. See page 11 R'1 (b) Consideration o f motion app roving Change Order No. to the plans and specific2.t:lons for Sewer Trunk ''B" ·- U ~ it 8 -Pacific Coast Hi[t way Force Main, Con~rac~ No. 5 -19, to impl eme nt agreement with Hoag Hospi t a l (Copy in Directors 1 meeting folders) -~-- (3 1 ) DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrant s , if any . See page "B" (32) DISTRICT 5 Considerat i on of mo t ion approv i ng war rants , if any . See page "B 11 (33) DISTRI CT 5 Other bu s ine ss and commun i cat i ons , i f a n y (34) DISTRICT 5 Co n s id e r a t i on of mot i o n to adjourn (3 5 ) DISTRI CT 6 Cons i derat i on of motion approving a l l i t ems of joint bus iness at the November 8, 1972 meeting, not acted u pon by Dist rict No . 6 b e c ause of lack of quorum . See page "S 11 (36) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion approving ;;arrants , if anj'-7 Sec page n o n (3 7) DISTRICT 6 Other b u siness and communication s , i f a n y (38 ) DI STRICT 6 (39 ) <;jd!~ (40 ) (41) (42) Considerat i o n o f mo tion to ad j our n DISTRICT 2 Status report r e Proposed Annexat i on No . 6 -Anaheim Hil l s Annexation No . 1. See page "T " DISTRICT ·2 Consideration of motion authorizing e mployment of Everett S . Schmid for right of way appraisa l s e rvices in conn e ction with r ight of way acquisition for County Sanitation District No . 2 re Santa Ana River Interceptor , Contra ct No . 2-14 , at a per giem rase o f $15.00 per hour for a total amount not to exceed $~;~88~Gg' as recommended by the Genera l Counsel . See page nu rr DISTRICT 2 Consideration of mot i on approving Chan g e Order No . 2 , to t he plans and specifications fo r the Santa Ana River Intercep t or 1 F r om Reclamat i o n Plant No . 1 to Katella Avenue , Contract No . 2 -1 4 -1, authorizing an increase in pipe size from 72 inches to 78 inches to the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting Company , at no cost :~f _the D~9tr,ict. See page "V" w l,W"' -ul-t'ew-. DISTRICT 2 Considerat i on of mot i on approving warrants , if any . See page 11 B 11 (43 ) DISTRICT 2 Other business and commun i cations , if any (a ) Consideration of motion to rec e ive and fil e communications re g arding h earing s in connection wit h propos ed conn e c t i o n char ge s '"~D IS T RI CT 2 ~J ·Considera tion o f motion to a djourn t o 7:30 p .rn ., De c em b e r 20 , 197 2 (4 5 ) DIST RI CT f Co nsidera ti o n of Reso lut i on No . 7 2 -111-7, o r deri n G an n exatio n of terr i to r y to the District (Pr o posed Annexation No . 26 - S a n tiago Bou levard Annexat io n to ~aunty San itat ion Distri~~ No . 7) See page --~-11 __ ·-5 -- • • • (46) DISTRIC T 7 (47) (48) (49) (5 0) (5 1) (52 ) (53) (54 ) (55) Consideration of motion to receive and file le tter fr o m H. Law s on Mead, Attorney At Law , dated Nove mb er 13, 1972 , requesting final approval of Propo se d Annexation No . 2? on behalf o f the propone nts of said annexation; a nd considera- tion of Resolu t i on No. 72-51 -7 , ordering a nn e xation of te r ritory to the District (Proposed Annexati o n No . 27 -~ Mead Annexation to County Sanitation D:is~r?_:;J No . 7) .. See J" p ages}/\))~·~~': fl ~te"Y ~c:: ~W"' ~'~ 1 ~ DISTRICT 7 ~ {})/ ~"-~ \!? Cons i deration of Resolution No . 72 -65 -7, brdering annexation f of territor y to the District (Proposed Annexation No . 30 -4t Tr ac t 6232 t o County Sanitat i on District No . '7) See ~ p age "Z" -~ \ ;.c? t. DISTRICT 7 Status report re Proposed Annexation No . 28 -Tract No . 7389 (Estate of Marion E . Jones) to County Sanitation Distr i ct No . 7 . See page "AA" '~-- DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving warrants , if any . See page 11 C11 DISTRICT 7 Othe r bus ine ss and communications , if any DISTRICT 7 ~ -,/l) d,'}v Conside ration of mot i on to adjourn ()' > 7 DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving Addendum No . 1 to the ~ t; t p l ans and specifications f o r Bolsa Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 10 , Contract No . 3-17 -1,for County Sanita tion Di strict No . 3 and Bolsa Avenue Storm Dra~n f~r the Ci t y of Westminster. See page ,.BB ', ~ DISTRICT 3 Further consideration of routing of Knott Interceptor , Re ach 4, Contract No . 3-18, throug h the City of Westminster , Ldefer,;r e )l ((2., from specialT,meeting o1f t~~~e~ ~~~ ~ .-L (~ y DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approv i ng warrants , if any . · See page 11 B " DISTRICT 3 Other business and communic a tions , if any (a ) Consideration of motion to receive and file communications re g arding hearings i n connectio n with p r o p os e d conne ctions ch a rges ( 56 ) DIS'rRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7 :30 p .m., January 3 , 1 973. -6- ~. Ii II II Ii Ii i I ,I II II BO AR D S O F DIRE CTORS County Sa ni tati o n Di stricts P. 0. Box 8127 10844 ~l lis Avenue Founta in Valley, CaliF., 92708 of Orange Cou nt y, California JOINT BOARDS Preliminary A G E N D A 12/8/72 December 13, 1972 -7:30 p .m. (1) P l edge of Allegi ance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen .pro tern, if necessary (4) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from City of Vi l la Park regarding appointment of Robert R . Dunne as alternate Director on the Board of District No. 2 (5) EACH DISTRICT ~ Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings , as mai l ed: District 1 District 2 Distri ct 3 District 5 Di strict 6 District 7 District 11 November 8 , 1972 regular, November 16, 1972 adjourned and November 2 1 , 1972 adjourned November 8 , 1972 regular November 8, 1972 regular and December 7, 1972 special (Copy i n Directors ' meeting fold e rs) • November 8, 1972 regular October 1 1 , 1972 regular and November 8 , 1972 regular November 8 , 1972 regular November 8 , 1972 regular (6) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman (7) AL L DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager (8) ALL DIS TR ICTS Report of t h e General Counsel (9) ALL DI ST RIC TS Considera tio n o f moti on to convene i n e xecutive ses sio n re p e r s onne l ma tt e rs (10) ALL DI STR I CT S Conside r ation of mo tion to r e conve n e in r egul ar sess i on (11) ALL DISTRICTS Action on items considered in executive session: (a) Consideration of actions re meet and confer personnel sessions (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 72-160, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 71-3, as amended (Copy in Directors' meeting folders) (12) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive and Building Committees and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committees' written report dated December 8, 1972 (13) ALL DISTRICTS * * * * * * * * * * * CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered separately in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to appr9ve all agenda items _appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6, to the plans and specifications for Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8, authorizing an addition of $8,682.17 to the contract with Kordick & Rados, a Joint Venture. See page "D" (b) Consideration of motion to receive, file, deny and refer to contractor, the following claims for alleged damages in connection with construction of Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8, as recommended by the General Counsel: Claim submitted by Mr. & Mrs. Henry Gomez, dated November 22, 1972, in the amount of $3,057.36. See page "E" Claim submitted by City of Fountain Valley, dated November 16, 1972, in the amount of $2, 010 .14. See page "F" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 3) -2- (13) CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) ' (c) Consideration of motion ratifying attendance of General Manager at the 1972 Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments Workshop~in Detroit, Michigan, on December 12th; and approving reimburse- ment of transportation, lodging, meals and incidental expenses incurred, as recommended by the Executive Committee (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 72-161, awarding purchase contract for Supplying Chlorine in One Ton Cylinders, Specification No. C-005, to Georgia-?acific Corporation in the amount of $112.70 unit price per ton. See page "G" (e) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulations and recommendations, and awarding purchase of the following: Specification No. E-066 for One (1) Engine Analyzing Equipment Unit Designed Specifically for Engine Diagnosis, to Sun Electric Corporation in the amount of $4,326.00. See page "H" Specification No. A-063 for Six (6) 4-Wheel Electric Cars, to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company in the amount of $9,032.63. See page "I" Specification No. A-064 for One (1) 1/2-Ton Pickup Truck, to International Harvester Company in the amount of $2,940.00. See page "J" Specification No. A-065 for Three (3) 1-Ton ·Flat Bed Trucks, to Santa Ana Dodge, Inc. in the amount of $10,499.05. See page "K" ----- Specification No. A-066 for Four (4) 1-Ton Cab and Chassis, to International Harvester Company in the amount of $12,030.00. See page "L" Specification No. A-067 for One (1) 16,000 lb. \. GVW Truck With Articulated Hydraulic Crane, to Santa Ana Dodge, Inc. in the amount of $10,599.75. See page "M" (f) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to issue purchase order to Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc. for acquisition of 24 improved replacement cylinder heads and manifold assemblies, for a net trade-in price not to exceed $8,000.00 plus tax and freight. See page "N" (14) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any (15) ALL DISTRICTS Report and recommendation of General Counsel re affect of recently passed Proposition 20 (Coastal Zone Conservation Act) on award of Job No. P2-21, Digesters "N" and "O" at Plant No. 2 (16) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing the Districts to enter into a joint statement with other sewering agencies, opposing the proposed amendment to Section 2144 of the Clean Water Grant Program which would have the effect of limiting State and Federal construction grant aid for wastewater projects situated in "critical air areas," to a capacity level to meet ~xisting needs plus five years of growth. -3- (17) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file certification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment (18) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving warrant books for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing payment of claims listed on page "A" (19) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications, if any (20) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of Resolution No. 72-162-1, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Digesters "N" and "O" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-21, to Hemisphere Constructors, Inc. in the amount of $1,068,413.00. See pages "O" and "P" (21) DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants, if any. See page "C" (22) . DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "B" (23) DISTRICT 1 (24) ~25) (26) (27) (28) (29) (30) Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 11 Consideration of Resolution No. 72-163-11, authorizing execution of Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company to accomodate street improvements by the City of Huntington Beach in Newland Avenue. See page "Q" DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants, ·if any. See page "B" DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "C" DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Consideration of items re oversizing Pacific Coast Highway Sewer crossing to serve Hoag Hospital and surrounding area (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 72-166, authorizing execution of agreement with Hoag Hospital for over- sizing Pacific Coast Highway S·ewer crossing in connection with replacement of a portion of Newport Beach Trunk A. See page "R" (b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. to the plans and specifications for Sewer Trunk "B" - Unit 8 -Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-19, to implement agreement with Hoag Hospital (Copy in Directors' meeting folders) -4- (31) DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants, if any. See page "B" (32) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of n1otion ap:µroving warrants, if any. See page "B" (33) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications, if any (34) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (35) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion approving all items of joint business at the November 8, 1972 meeting, not acted upon by District No. 6 because of lack of quorum. See page "S" (36) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "C" (37) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications, if any (38) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (39) DISTRICT 2 Status report re Proposed Annexation No. 6 -Anaheim Hills Am;exation No. 1. See page "T" (40) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion authorizing employment of Everett S. Schmid for right of way appraisal services in connection with right of way acquisition for County Sanitation District No. 2 re Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No. 2-14, at a per diem rate of $15.00 per hour for a total amount not to exceed $1,500.00, as reconunended by the General Counsel. See page "U" (41) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2, to the plans and specifications for the Santa Ana River Interceptor, 'From Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No. 2-14-1, authorizing an increase in pipe size from 72 inches to 78 inches to the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting Company, at no cost to the District. See page "V" ( 42) -DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "B" (43) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications, if any (44) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., December 20, 1972 (45) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 72-111~7, ordering annexation of territory to the District (Proposed Annexation No. 26 - Santiago Boulevard Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7) See page "W" -5- ... (46) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from H. Lawson Mead, Attorney At Law, dated November 13, 1972, requc~ting final approval of Proposed Annexation No. 2G or1 behalf of the proponents of said annexation; and considera- tion of Resolution No. 72-51-7, ordering annexation of territory to the District (Proposed Annexation No. 27 - Mead Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). See pages "X" and "Y" (47) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 72-165-7, ordering annexation of territory to the District (Proposed Annexation No. 30 - Tract 6232 to County Sanitation District No. 7) See page "Z" (48) DISTRICT 7 Status report re Proposed Annexation No. 28 -Tract No. 7389 (Estate of Marion E. Jones) to County Sanitation District No. 7. See page "AA" (49) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "C" (50) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications, if any (51) DISTRICT 7 (52) Co~sideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Bolsa Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 10, Contract No. 3-17-1,for County Sanitation District No. 3 and Bolsa Avenue Storm Drain for the City of Westminster. See page "BB" (53) DISTRICT 3 Further consideration of routing of Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No. 3-18, through the City of Westminster, deferred from special meeting of December 7, 1972 (54) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "B" (55) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications, if any (56) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., January 3, 1973. -6- CLARK MILLER ~ C, ARTHUR NISSON NE:LSON KOGLER H. LAWSON MEAD MILLER. NISSON S KOGLER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2014 NORTH BROADWAY SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706 December 13, 1972 Directors of County Sanitation Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: Re: Report on Agenda Item 15 Regular meeting of December 13, 1972 !\ien~a Item No •• /~ .• ,. TE:LEPHONE AREA CODE 714 542-6771 The enactment of Proposition 20 as a Constitutional Amendment will require a permit from the South Coast Regional Water Commission after February 1, 1973 for Project P2-21. The effect of this statute on projects under way before that time is uncertain; however, P2-21 was not under construction prior to November 7, 1972. In that no permit to build was required prior to the passage of Proposition 20, there are no guidelines regarding the effect of the start of construction on a project prior to February 1, 1973. It does seem certain that an appli- cation for a permit should be made as soon as possible. It is my recommendation that the Directors authorize a Supplemental Agreement to be approved by the low bidder as a condition to letting the contract for P2-21. The Supplemental Agreement should recognize the possibility of delay, or a work stoppage, by reason of Proposition 20 and provide that the Districts should not be penalized in such an eventuality. It should also protect the contractor from price changes, if any should occur during work stoppages occasioned by the effect of Proposition 20. In line with this recommendation, I suggest a delay in the awarding of the contract for P2-21 until such time as a Supplemental Agreement can be worked out and approved by the State and Federal grant agencies and the apparent low bidder. I suggest the Supplemental Agreement be presented to the low bidder and second low bidder and the contract be awarded to the second low bidder if the low bidder will not accept the Supplemental Agreement and the second low bidder will accept the Supplemental Agreement. Directors of County Sanitation Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 -2-December 13, 1972 It is believed that an extension of the 90 day award period required by the State and Federal grant agencies can be complied with or extended so that the grant for this project will not be lost. I have every reason to believe the Districts will be granted a permit for P2-21 from the South Coast Regional Comis- sion in the due course of events. An Environmental Impact State- ment was prepared and submitted to public hearing. It has been submitted to the cities of Huntington Beach and Newport Beach and no criticism has been made. The State Water Resources Control Board and the Federal agency charged with enforcing the National Environmental Policy Act have approved the project as in compliance with their criteria. Project P2-21 will not alter any bay, estuary, salt marsh, river mouth, slough or lagoon; it will not reduce the size or other area useable for public recreation; it will not reduce or impose restrictions upon public access to tide or submerged lands or beaches; it will not interfere·with the line of sight toward the sea from the state highway nearest to the coast and, lastly, it will not adversely affect water quality. It is in fact needed to provide treatment for increased effluent to prevent the adverse affect of such ~ncreased sewage on water quality. CAN:ac Very truly yours, (/c~ ~-~-· I r u~~;(c~I. /µ~dJ-, C. Arthur Nisson General Counsel DISTRICT 2 -Agenda Item No. 43(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file communications regarding hearings in connection with proposed connection charges DISTRICT 3 -Agenda Item No. 55(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file communications regarding hearings in connection with proposed connection charges GARDEN GROVE ~fiamfier-aC ~arnmettee December 6, 1972 Board of Directors Orange County Sanitary Districts No. 2 & 3 Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Re: Public Hearings for December 20, 1972 and January 3, 1973 Dear Sirs: Agenda Item Nos &./ J(~) ~ S S(a We appreciate receiving the November 14 notices concerning the notice of intent to adopt Ordnances No. 203 and 303. The December 20 date relative to the hearing of Ordaance No. 203 and the January 3rd date relevant to proposed Ordnance No. 303 occur at a time that is difficult for representatives of our Chamber of Commerce to attend the hearings. Therefore, we would concur with the request of postponement of the two probable hear- ings, as suggested by the Garden Grove Sanitary District to a date later than the 15th of January. At this time it is the present intent of our Chamber of Commerce to register protest testimony ordinances. Therefore, a change of date will be of great assistance. JE/jtb Sincerely, / . ·,'( f, . i __ . /t., ll-t-t.... ... ~/ . I 11 /\/(Lt-C John Harl, Vice President Economic Development Council Chamber of Commerce Agenda Item No. '13t~...SSd>J CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA 11391 ACACIA PARKWAY, GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA 92640 Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary Board of Directors December 8, 1972 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 812 7 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. Sylvester: In behalf of the Garden Grove City Council, this is to request that public hearings scheduled by Orange County Sanitary District No. 2 for Decem- ber 20, 1972, and by Orange County Sanitary District No.3 for January 3, 1973, to consider funding alternatives for Sanitary District facilities and the adoption of ordinances concerning sewage connection charges, be postponed until February 1973. The Council so requested this postponement during its regular meeting December 5, 1972, and we would appreciate receiving statistical informa- tion or any other material which may be helpful to us in the review of this matter. This background information would also aid us in fully participat- ing in the upcoming public hearings and provide us opportunity to express Garden Grove's position on the alternatives. Thank you for your consideration of this request and we look forward to receiving the data. Sincerely, CITY OF GARDEN GROVE CITY CLBRK .. ..;. '· 1 /vas OFFICERS Chairman of tlH• Board Carl Krn1la ~loulton ~i:.tut>I \\" a!t•r ! >t~tril"l Prt>sident and Genna/ llrlluJi<•'r 1.uri•·n !>. ·1 ruhill Cliairman·Mem,1nsliip Rd:1liom l! .. au l.!1·1nt•n,. Bf' au Clt'IIll'llS ..\ :h" wialr'- 1airman-Citv Cl111mli1•n ld.-i . .-,,n- • =::tn' Jrl 1\.1,. ·pd ... c: mrll Douglas Astronautie• C1m1p;rn\· Tr ... 1s1ir1•r Rohrrt F. llan=-011 Arthur Youn:r ~\ l'.11ntiJall\ Cl1airman ExPc:ulit-t? Comniill"•' E. II. Fi11·l•·r Bovlr En~irw•·rin:.: PrP~irlPnt, St>0 n11tor., C/ul1 · l.011 h···l-..11 Prrk Family Colonial Fuwral !lorn~ DIRECTORS J)('rrirk A . .-\11.kr~on Fra11k L. Hope & A~~(J•·i.•t•·!' Winn lland\· Airporlt•r Inn llott:I Huv 1:. Hult ·f\,, il-.~d llon.ild \\'. Bo\ l",i Airport St'n11·1·. hu'orp•1r.~tt-d Ik.rn t.l• 1111·11~ Ur.au Clernrrt" & .-\:.:•'•"ial":< H. W. Cliifonl Air Calif,,rnia Edward 0. EtJu-11 Aut11ndir-. E. II. Fin•trr Hovle En~irwr·rin:! Ihiht>rt E. li.111-nn Arthur Young..\ Co111p.1m John ll.1-k.-ll Br-eco. l.i1rn t•·<i IL Hc>Cl:!rr II •Y.-r·ll Hu tan S•. Tu··l-.i-r Frnton E. Jonr" \Vest Orangr County \l11nicip:1l Cnurt Leon I:. Jon•·.: Jones, Elliott & .\,.•o··i.ilf• Gordon lPllf':' Thr. In inf' Cnnipany Str\' art K· •i·pi:-1-.e ·nnrll Douglas Astronautic;; Lomp.im· ' :\11\.och 1rlu•is-'f rimllc ~'\: ~clson, lnrorfH•r.tlt>d <:arl K\mla Moulton '.'ii;zuf.'! Watrr I li~triet Will IL Limk1y. Jr. Con~ul tinl! E11:.::i1wer John ll. \lrrrrll. ll \halt & \lr•mll Joe \lrConnirk Ern!"t ,'\. Ern,;t \Id \liller Bani-. of :\nwric·n Westinghou:;e F.lcctrir C:oqmration !J.,lr Po~t ;t Amt'rican Titlt' ln~ur.aner Compilny J.ime-I:. :--.dl•·r Kin~bcrl) .CLirk Lorpo: .. t111:l l~1d .. T<l .I. :-rr.:t.h Hunt.\\es~ L><ril·. [·~, • •rJ'·,~:.t!•·d \!1::.:: ,, . l', 1;:."~ R.al~lt 1 '"''~·'I' ' ' ~ ... .: ....... ~ ·~i : .. - NG~ COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMM~RCE 401 BANK OF AMERICA TOWER, THE CITY• ONE CITY BLVD. WEST, ORANGE, CALIF. 92668 • 17141 639·6460 December 8, 1972 Mr. Fred Harper General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Off ice Box 8127 Fountaj.n Valley, California 92705 Dear Fred: We have received a request from the Garden Grove Sanitation District requesting a delay in the public hearing on the proposed sewer connection charge. If there are no technical difficulties with such a change we would like to suggest that this re- quest be given consideration. Cordially, Will Lindsay, Jr., Chairman Sanitation Task Force WL/jwc Age nda I t e ms No s . 45 , 4 6 , 4 7 & 48 S CAl £ 1·~ ~PPliO>' .J AO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY• C ALI FO RNIA DISTRICTS AND TRUNK SEWERS 1971 •.!.: (l rJ~;;-~~(i/~t;.) ;'i/,.:-...4.~.(i'ZAC# ~ f ~,.....L!\'!+~_-..,-..._~~~~~1.7S6 % 0 A") 1J..~) ~ N0 r£ 5,,.,,, 111-11 "'l/11'11 Oilfr.CI No7 art 'M;i111~Pla,,· s~rs :::~ ;:;,::':::....~~ ~.J~, c;::f1,/.~ {_/'- ./ Agenda Items No s. 45 , 46 , 47 & 48 SCA L C 1 •, J!.PPllOX J M l COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNI A DISTRICTS AND TRUNK SEWERS 1971 THI RD SEWER l ~AINTENANCE DISTRICT ' ' I, " ,'VO!C, $1 .. 1 11 J l!tlW'fl •1/f)J11 °'"'~' M>, tiff ·u,n1,.,,,a,f J-u :'cZ'i ~:;,::'::,r;.,,,o;:.., ~l/1fl lJ1tlflCl1 ,Sttl {)(11nc/ No.~li/ffs . ./\.,.. ( / \ ....... / JSE H 91 30 (Excerpt ed f rom Octob er 4, 1 9 72 t he comm ittee a pp!auc'l.s a nd wish es t o enc ou rag e stro ng-SLite construct i on as- s is t ance p ro:?r:u!ls . M r . Speaker . in conclusion , I urge th a t. t his r 0nf Pr.-.nr-0 ':'C:Jo rt r eceivE' p u n a nimous vo t e. O t;r country n eed s e f-· f~c L i \'e 'l';atcr pollution control legis la - t1 on . \Ve can p ro\'ide it wday b v o ur ac - tions. · Mr. JOHN30!': of C alifornia. Mr. S peaker, I have been prinleged to serve a s one o! the HotL>e conferees on the water pollu\.ion c.mtrol bill. Under the able l crr d e r shi p of the gent leman fr om Jl.l a ba ina we h a ~·e h "nunered out a bill Li ia t r e pres ents a \·ic Lo r y for all w ho want to cl ea n up t he Nat!on·s r i\·ers. streams. a nd la k es. and who look to Cong ress fo r env iron men lal le a dership. I ca ll yo u r att.emion to a m a jor pro- v is ion i n this b iJl-the funding provi - s ion-in wh ic h I k~ow .Memb ers of t he H ouse h ave p :nt1cula r inte rest. ·we :i r e aware o f i h e ded icat:on and the d eter - m inat io n of State a nd l ocal o ffic ials to dea l wiLh their water pollution prob- l e ms. b u t 1'.'e know. too. the utter frus tra- tion t hey face in raisir:g the necessa ry f unds. There ha1·e b een e s t!mates a ll over the ballp a r ~ as to 'l\'hat will be r eo u ired to o nce again make o ur r frers and· lakes p lac es w e cnn enj oy and be proud o f. The H 0 us e a nd tl~e co nfer ence com mi ttee h a ve looked very car eiull y a t the m atter of fun ding. You may r ecall t hat t he bill tha t 1rn s~cd t his body l:lst ;:\l arc h called for author izi n g a little m or e than S24 .6 b ill ion. t h e Senat e b ill a u thorize d S20 billion. :ind the ad.m inist r ation reau e s tcd $6 b illion . T he c onferees h a ye a:n:eed on C.55 Cnt ialiy the same fi;;ure as i n the H ouse bill, $24.6 b illion f o r the pi:riod through fiscal 1975 . A t ot.al o f $1 8 bil- lion of t h is sum is f or con s truction grants. an d breaks d own n ot to exceed $5 bill ion for fi scal 19 13, S6 b ill ion fo r fi sca l 1 974. and $7 bil lio n for fi s cal 197 5. Natu r a lly, the la r ge dinerence in what the administration a .-ked. and . ..,.·ha t the confere n c e b ill proYides. raises the ques- t ion of ,,·!Jy the substamial discr epancy? T here is on ly on e answer t.o that and j t i s that if we set out t.o do t.lli s j ob there i s. no way we can a ccompli sh it 'l'.ithout p aying t he p lice. If 1i;e w ant cl ean water. we ha ve to pay f or c lean water. If we wa nt t.h e S t.ates a nd citie s t o m oYc aggress i ve !~-a h ead in building waste t reatment p lan ts they mus t h a l'e Federnl a id . and t h ey m ust h ave con fi - dence tha t Was hington will contin ue . to lil'e u p to i Ls com mitm e n ts. This n eed f o r a depend'.lble. conl in - uing Fecl e rnl c.ommitment is the basis fo r t h e contract obligation autho1ity whic h h as been relain ed i n t he c onferen c e bil l. Construction p roj ects can be ini tiat ed as s oon as the Admin istrator approYes t hem . but there '"ill be n o m ajor spen d - iJ1g Impact umil fiscal i9-;5, T h e confr rence bill pro\ides !or the F edera l Go\·ernment to pay 'i5 percent of the costs of a con;,muni ty's waste tre'.lt - m ent p l a n t. leaving it up to t he S tates a n d l oc :1l communities t.o come u p wit!1 the r e m aining 25 percent. T here a re n o ·r es trictions on h ow they ca n rais e t heir 2:. percent The b111 reported b? the conference ·imposes n reqwrement that publi cly . H 9 131 CO NGRE S$I ONAL RECO RD -HOUSE ) ... Octobe r 4 , 19 72 COJ o·wned treatment works provide second- a ry treatment a.~ defmcd by the EPA Ad- ministrator in projects that come L'!.to existence by Jo..nu:!.ry l. 1()76. TI1is is part of our objteLive of e::i rmn~LL:ng i_,._.i..iu l-a.J.lt.S from point sources Jr.do! incluc:ing pub- licly o v;ned sys tems within that obiec- tlve. I n defining the term "second'arv treatment'' u nder the provisions of sub:. ... section 304 ( b) (1 > m > and sut-section 304(d) <1>1 the Administratol' h?..s the d iscreti on to find that the "sccond:>.ry t reatment" requiremen t l s met by a l- t ernative means. For example. in the c ase o f deep ocean water d ischarges through ocean outfalls , the Administra- tor could d eterm..ine that "secondary treatment" r equirement s are met in th:i.t situation where the cl isc lluges have first, r ccei\•ed primary t rcat.men t. second, complied with r egulations governin g the di scharge of he<1.l'Y mNa ls and oc.he r toxic subst.a.nces and. Lhird, v:hcre the publicly ow·ned ao;:ency has demo11str ;<ted that suc h occ::i.n d!sci1:11·ges arc not in- consis tent v.ith tl1c purposes of t he act a.nd do not hann or c ncia n!;'er Lhe diver- sity, pro<lucti\ity and stability of th.e marine ecosystem. I t would be was teful of public funds to d efine "seconc!ary L1 er.r,ment" in such a fashion as to r equire expensive facili- t ies t.o achie\·e a d cg:·ec of Lreatment v.-hlch, under the pr:ictica1 circnmstances e xisting. would be t umcl:cssnry. · T h e d iscr etion co n ie rred u p on the Ad- m inistr a tor s hould be exercised by him only a fte r he has determined th:i.t wha t - e ver p rocesses or aci.ions cons tirnt.e "sec- o ndary treatment" co nform with :i.nd are c ons is t ent with the objcctl\·es o f the a ct and t hat t hey are t ccimic::tllv and e co- n omically fea si bl e. Moreove 1:, I believe t hat a n y publicly own ed system bears t l1e b urden of demonst rn1in g to t he ridm..i n - lstrator t hat t his will be Lile cr.s e. ·Mr. S peaker , I would call the atten- tion of t he Rouse to one other section o f t he b ill t hat pro\id cs aul!10riz;nicn !or c on struction grants. and that i s sec- t ion 3 <b > on page 90 of Lile conference r eport. Under thls sec tion, n ot to e:.;ceed $3 50 million Is au t horized fo r p·ar:ts und e r section 8 oi t he existi.llg Ped eral Water P o lluti on Control Act ior the fis - c a l yea,r t hat ended l n,st J w1e 3 0. T he F ederal s h :!.re of g r ants fo r t r e a t - m ent wo rks construction s h all b e the s ame as t hat a uthorized by section 20 2 o f the c ommittee r eport. I t is the i nter:t of the c onfer ees iilat the allocat.ion oi the $35 0 million s h all be made in accord- a n ce ~.it h section 8 of existing law. E x- cept for r eallocated f unds. there is n o provision in section 8 for d iscretionar y al~oc ati ons . The conferees believe that the needs for cons truction gran ts exceed t he d ollars available for lhe fisca l year e n din g J une 30, 1972. a.lld i t is exoected that t here will be esse ntiall y n o. fisc al year 19 72 f unds a.rail a ble for discretion- ary rea llot.m ent. Mr. S peaker, at this time I wo ul d like to call t he a ttentio n of the H ouse t o two t ypoi;,'1·apllic al e r r o r s in sccLio n 3 . t h e s ection to which I refe r. T he fi rst sen- tence of bot h sections \:\.) and (b) shou ld r ea d: There Is nuthor l.zed t o be np propriated for t he fiscal y ea.r endlog J une 30 , J 97:.l , n ot, (I repeat, not ) to exceed, n.nd so !o.n h . 4 • r .. ~ .... : .. :, t ·: I ! : . ~l--.. j . .. .. . ,,._.... . .... •·· ....... . ·. ·' Cb.) lnterceptorE and outfalls ~ l:he ccst. o! that.. fnoill ty wh.ich would not incrense. axn beyond the. cnpo.ci ty · ·:>.\: .. ~.~·.·~::.~·;::l'ndi·c~tcd .. · in·. tho· ·f6llowing:.-.tru,10::... ·· S mqd or .. lcsg 6 mgd or. gr~ nte:r ... ever .. is: Ir.ore, res t.:i:icid ve. Total. E1iylbl~ f.Ex~ac}. t.:t .r .. ~T.!.~ . .. ~-~··.-:: t:.:-_;. •' .::..: •• : ~·..-.. :·. ;# ._. •. 1"'-,;. "• .:t ............... ;~ • .,.• ·T-• - - . -· • ... ·••. •-........ • ··:·• • ·~~ • •: -"';,~: ••:, •• ":' .~ .... :_; ... •.•.,,;:::.• :...! • · · oi.ty linu. tit tJ_r;n~ in p~:-nqz-~ph { tl) nnd par nq:n1ph (i> !: · · · -· · • .:.• ......... ~···• ••• ~·. ••• ••• tt• • H4 I • •• •• It •.t 91 .: •• •• • • •:• :10•: ~~ j~: •,• • . .,•,• •., • .• • .. • • • • ., • • • ••• t .·~• ,_..,. ,:• f!l.~hf !l_ e~_:')tj._'?_!).~ .. ~)e;~ .. a! tJ1on9h in? li 9iblo would be cal-· •.. .......... .. . .... . . .... .. .. ... .. . -. culnted on-an L1cre~ntal coet basia .• ln consitl~_l:.i.t.HJ etla liri~ infill.:r at.i011 capnci ty, infilt:r;uti~n thrit can be co~rected by w.ore fe·.1sibl-s. ma·ans. Cnpnci ty f~r. futl!l;e~ infiltration shall. ~e­ limi ted .. t.c !'l!')wg that can lJe t})!~1;¢tr.:d wi tJl ti 9ht. and p::operly instElled. conduit eys t:~ms·• J;11Iing · thcEe· fiscal y~a:::a tha-c Gi:c·up Il.l. projects· are not. eligible for. tJ~arrt par.ti¢! pat1on, Ci1pac1 ty incluc!od in Cl~ss B interceptors which t;Grvcs ro9ion~l ~ur~ceef?·. anc!· which me·ets the: ~ri te.:ia ... ci.pplied tc Class I\--"---· A 1nt.i~t'c~pter$ $h~ll be eli9i:t;,lo for 9:r:~nt ast·>istan¢C •. I . - . ~- I " . . ~ ·~. "')_ . ,, . . ,•; ., prcjGcta which sel.-ve e-xpall~lcn <d' c:d.!Jtin~1 communit:iez in nccord~nca with the prcvis~~1s of tti$ $~c~lon. Grunt.a will no{; pe m.ltl(i ~w<tJ.l(ililo for prc-jects to ee~ve to se~.ve a~nas \·1hich wo::::-s designed prima~ily c _.r -;' 1~,,f;"! .... ,,. ... .... ,, ing_ pollati~n p:?:(\b~tr ig of. cve.rrici1HJ .intf;Ottan-;-J. In the 1.attor. <)~So, grM"t pu:rticipaticn. shall be. dele~mined io ac~orr.?wv. .. "'<..\ with· the prc;rit:ions cf thin gect.icn e~~epl! th·~t-cc·s b; cf. facility c?.tpaci ~y j )\ e~et':~s <)~ tho c~plt(:i t.y linrl.tat.ions in (~) Mel. (b) · «J:.ove ~lt-j1c-.ugh ineligibl~ will !.."'e:. calculatet.l on ~ prorntu b'1sis t iUlU nc-t. on· the basie cf inc.r~rrJ;)n tal. CGn.t. \'la.ete treat:men!; f;u:;.i li ~ice fr:r. . . . • hj• T;hf;! 9~ant p~1)9.Lit.m l;ut :5ho.uld ~ ·p:!:ovidEil-at. the.· ex:..· .. vcn~c of dovol~~ers... thia provision is n01: .. ic·teneed to. lJ.TtU. f.:Otl f~.nds ~ .. ndl~le to correct. pollution prtJbli>n'.S. . ( c~ Il"J the event f;.ha~· a p.Yoµc)~f:d w~~-l;t.l'r.-:s.te.r tro.!\t-- rtliAnt. Er.¢)1.~ct wi 11 :.~orv~ p~cr;.c·s~e dt=v'=lc:-pr:ien-t t.hut will ... ... -. -. oc:cu!.·. with in th~ t't)\.md~= ic~ r; £ a Cri ti c~l Jdr .?..rr.> ~ eos ~ q-•·n••,. ......,_...:..«. p_a:-f:.c_&;: .. :~.::t~h. 9x._tr.r:; ~t.~t-t' ,.. . .A1r Hl!:oc-urc~P Bc-tl:!:'d ~ eliqib 10 E~Oj~ct ccsts sh~11 h~ ci~~ern-~nse ns provided in th~s . I -3-· . ·~ r , I \ . -~ .... :· .... · .. ::;.. .. · . :: ~;·'·;. ·-::.· -· .· :; ... .. ~~. • :1 .:i • h ca· -/: ' . . i · . bl m; I?r<.;.v.l (.G \.t 1 n p {tr ~.9.~ __ ....... 1_o_~_t_1_u __ .. r=_~_~_c_t __ 1_ ........ -__ n_,.._..e> ___ 1_r. ..... !_1 __ ~_ p:r'jj<:ct CGEts sh<lll nc,t exceed. the c~·ats i?.IJS<:·ciated Rerv<~ c~~aci i;V t.o ti?t'H~t nct·!~ls o.~<)j(~!....~cd ~i \'<.? yu~r:..; l11.m0"~ t ......... ~-,.............,~~.,. 't ,..,.,..,.~ ........ ...__..._._.._'\..~-· ...... ~ • ..,. .. ..1r--~--------·--------- f bo:i:onti. th~ unti~iPut~d nwnrcl c f;thE: DY-incir.:~1 ·cc·n~~ruct~~l! C!°'f\~:.~~ct. !l' t.})(.'t OV(?n~· tl'tc) li!;t.!~H)V c:_!c:;?-<:ld<;~ tt~ c;onst.1·\~~t ..... ~.~~1->#~....,._._,pa~ .............................. ~ ........... ~ ..... ~lllP"'-\.Z.e.....,,...,.,,......._,.___....,....__, 4 -....~ . ...,,..., ___ ..._.._.. __ t.he o;--c-tt.~ct wit.h it ref;(n·vo ceu.at~it.v in <~:t.c::<.:~tt c! t-J~is. ~-1 . .,J.:.,,....,,..,£..:.~1L·.._~ I r ·~...,,,,.,., • ...,...,..,,,.,,.~.._.l'_.""-.._---~--.i. :.JI.....,.----=--.~...,,..__._._, " · ~ ........._,,... b.a..qed en curren~ t---=c.~a~t:.1:~f!nl ~f Finc.1h<:t-: ncr)Ulati!'>r, ~a.ta, ~....r:-~......,..-:iir.....w.,...;N>.1 ---...:.......c-,_~_...4/'a~~,...,-~, •. •=-~·~.;>S_,.,,,.._, .,, ci• ::;;..,........., ~."E-J"C:~ ,li~\i t.r.!d tc ,ti:.~~;:~!.atinn p~oj;!Ct.i~1w ~g ~abli2h~d by one or mort< <;ountio3, (d.t1.os, O!: tbo~o of e3n (\xle.tin:z ((! l -• el~~~~~. E!-v:l J..9..'~~~.!!J-2~~~)~.~~Lf~CS.~~~~t. and ,{b} cf this ne~t.ton, y!"!>Vido.d it ~(;~o nrd nm~ th,.1 t t.ht.:: f ~(~$ described in eubnaJ.:aq:r5phe· (1) , (2) nr1d en I er in· thG !1t~Ynativ~ '~~~.t::-tW~~-:'!E.12£-::r~:~r~)~., ~!l~:.s't ... ..., . <!> The '.'/~:§t~·utor-p~oicct -is ~ cr"'~t;en-tly f4 . needed p;irt. cf tha nppli~ilh.le ~~sin l,lu.n MJ i:; ni::;~ C'-'f::-· \ . \\ I \ ~ I -~-- I 14 r ... • <r'. 1-... • . !'t- 1 · I· ~ r ~ ~: . ~ L t- !' I· ~. :: ~ I .. t. l• !; !~ .. . .. •' 't~ .. - ~- .. I ~ <!: • : . ., . . • . : ·.·. ,.· •. I .,· ,, ~-:. ·· ... : f .-. able. of b~i nq rj.t~:;inn:Jd und conat.rucc.~·!d en a r.~)(~\\l·~L" ..... v _...,.. ... ,"'""' .. "4~ ............_..~ ............. _., !&:! ••lea {2) Thu;:c {!; a !5olf-limit:i.nq oarl cf the f acilitiu~ of whJ.<..:h 5. t is a tart tha~ liJ11i..t:a ~~ .......... ~--------------------- tho u:;;e c·f th~ cal?_ac.i t:Y ...... l?.£ .. J-lir~.J'.l:'::;~:-(n'l'~tr.n:· ~·roiect to . '.>1'v\·.J_ (.t~: ... N,.. a canac! ~" P. l.d f1'. oicnt tt.) .serve t1!:~ ~-">-6!"\u-="':~(1 dpun lOPTI\l;-:.n t -----------~,;...-.4~.,....,,... ........ ~ ~#-.....-...4, \,:; ..,._OI -t'f I ;e ... • ,&.J .~• ..... -e • "-""' #-•.. • in the·Crit~c.~~ . ..!'lJ:.J're(t fo~ « p~:__Liod of f~vG ye.:n:n .. bt:yvnd tt .. ft. <lilt~ of .ant..if.!! .. t~~·0'·1 .. ~"a=d of tho I?r1nci Eil~ .. _c_o_n_s_t_":£_u_c_t.:_·_i_.:_-r_1_c_o_n_t_.r_a_, _c_t.. __ • __ ............ 'fl ..... 1 ..... '-_~ ..,.., __ f,,...i '!2:;Y,<J \\ r: f ~.::ro c ns t · rouv bs . b;mGd c.n cut·rf!nt. r:~~.t":'t.'lt~ !,?,f F~~~·~ p.mu~ntion dutu, o:-· such other. infc-~at ic-1' ae mav bo ft'n1i l ~1~) .. !?:~-=--~.fl~:Jll.fil.!:9- ~E ... \!..SJ}.:r~i. t?r.1 to pcpulutic~1 pxojeGtions. t~BJ.:.~ h~~~~q tt (3 ~ T!lc:. Bo~1~c.i de b~rmineE. th:J t tJ~~ pxoj~ct:. -l ~H•~ •A• """~.a ~,.I . • .. • '• .. ~' ~ ~• • .;.,.,.. .... ""'~'..-t.'"••..,,.., -.,..,.......,..,..., .,.._~.,...,.....t\.•;J~·7'J~ .. ··M·• ~ .t··~..-.!'\,.•••••·•.;..#;.."-'·U r~-"';.\WaA\,'l;~.U~--i~fic.:ct: n.s~·1d envir~1u:: .. ti1~t:"~. ?;f(!~~~:.t . ...:·Lt~.lc .. y ro1~t.inq thv~c..=-'!:'.o_ . !· .. .. .. =· i~ .. .. • ~' ~·-;:J:~i.J,. have sp~cifi,~c.11~ ~n.?~~~ti,~-~)~ .. ~l~~~l.,~~~_!(d ~x!.stin1, the project. and f:11.t_.1}£c:~~ t~~rn~ l~to air ~nd w~ttJ r· gu~.1.!11 ~)~n)l~~~g~m.~· Md 0bjecti•.!eE. Acfu ticnrlllz, the·· gzant npnlicatim\ l n; ... 0.~~ct ,_ .. t:~(lr{-., ·an1,.! ct•'' i ronrrr.m tal ~;;..;;;...--'------~.&:..-------al..'"",-·~--·-.. .,.,.. ' ... "~.......-..... ~~ ... ttiu i'ifft~,)t tt:.!t~· th(.t ~r:r:lic.Mt ncknc.wlef!r;~s thnt· in· in-· Wl>W & 3 WC la .. .. . • . . . ..s.~... . ..... ,_ .... ,,, •. \, .!' ~es wl~ere the Board determine~ eligible project costs on the bmis .. of this paragraph {d) relative to a project in a Critical Air Arco, that y1hcn tho need to e;<par.d any ports of the overalt ~rojects ari~cs, th.'1rebl utifizin_g the additional capacity pcrmiHed to be constructed on thi$ basis, such may not occur or may be de fayed dependent on the extent to which oir qudity objectives presently being formufa~ed arc accomplished or are in the procc~s of being odcquotefy accomplished. ('!) The project is being cot1'structcd ~ofcfy to Improve water quolity or to accomplish recreational purposes and wilJ not ~rovide wastewater treatment facilities to setve cdditionol deve!opw ----------------------------------------~~------------_._- ment in a Critical Air Area,, Chairman Finnell Report of the Joint Chairman Call meeting of the Executive Committee for 5:30 p.m., Wednesday, January 3rd. .-(-?·_JJ,X .. c. ~,: C~-"-~,J --~~~-c~~-,7:.j 0 Invite Directors .Ste]3flensen a§:t_ McWh~ or Director~and Rogers, to attend and participate--m--the discussions. \S' - Report on meeting of Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies in Washington, D.C., November 28-30, 1972. MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS Post Off ice Box 8 127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain' Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 De c embe r 8 , 1972 REGULAR MEETI NG Wedn e sday, December 13, 1 972 7 :30 p.m. Th e fo llowing is a b r ief explanation of t he more important n on -routine it ems which appear on the enc l osed agenda and wh ich a r e not oth erwi se s e l f -exp l a nato r y . Warrant l ist s are not a ttache d to t h e a genda s i nce t h e y are made up imm e diat e ly prec e din g t he meeting but wi l l a ppe a r i n the c omp l ete agenda avai lable a t the meeting . J oint Boards No . 6 -Re p ort of t h e Joint Cha irma n -The Joi nt Ch a irman will r e po rt on meetings he and I a tt end ed in Wash i ngt on , D.C., r ela t i ve to the 1972 Federa l Water Po lluti on Co n t r o l Am e nd - ments ·Wh i ch are now being imp leme nt e d by t he Envi r onm enta l P ro tec tion Agen cy . No . 1 2 -Repo r t o f the Execut ive and Building Committ e e s a nd Acti ons on t he Comm i ttees ' Recommendations -The Commit tees met on the evenin g of December 6th, with Di rector Kymla as a g u e st . A wri tten r eport on t his meeti ng , t6geth er with th e r e c omm e n dations t o t he Joi nt Boar ds , is included with the agenda mate ria l . The .e x ecuti ve session no t ed on t he agen da con cern s r ecen t "m eet -a nd -confer 11 discussions with r e p resen tat i ves of t h e Orange Co unty Emp l oyees Association . No . 13 -Consent Ca l enda r -The f o l l ow i ng agenda i t e ms fa l l into this cat egory i n accordan ce wi th the defini t ion es t ab lished b y the Boar ds : (a ) Ch a n ge Orde r for I n t erp l a n t Influent I n tercepto r, J ob No . I -8 -Th i s Ch ange Orde r r e p rese n ts an added cost of $8,682 .17 . The con tractor was requi red to p rovi de a d d i tional bedd i ng r ock in a r eas wh ere t h e r e were l aye r s of peat , wh i ch made ove r -excavati on n e c essa r y . I n addition , the contracto r encountered a l arge con c r ete obs truc t ion whic h was n ot shovm on the p l ans . Al so , we r equired a sewe r connecti on to serve the Di strict s ' new shops a n d wa r ehou se . It is r ecomme n ded that the Change Or der be a p p r oved . (b) Deny Claim for Damages -The City of Fountain Valley and a local resident have filed with the Di stricts formal claims for damages a lleged l y caused by the contractor constructing the Interplant Influent Int erceptor on Br ookhurst south of Ellis Avenue . It is the General Counsel's r ecomme ndation that the claims be denied and the matter be referred to the Districts ' contractor, Kord i ck and Rados, a joint venture . (c) Authorization for the General Manager to Attend WPCF Workshop in Detroi t on December 12th -During the Joint Chairman 's and General Manager 's visit to the Environmental Protection Age ncy headquarters in Wa shington, D.C., it was suggested by several officials that the Distric ts be represented at a one -day workshop on 1 972 Amendments to the Water Pollution Control Act, to be held in Detroit on December 12th . The program provides for an interchange between Washington EPA staff personne l and management representing major ag:encies. The action appearing on the agenda ratifies the General Manager's attendance at this workshop, as recommended by the Exe cutive Committee . (d) Award of Chlorine Contract -The current contract to purchase chlorine will expire December 31st, there - f ore, new contract bids were received on December 6th . Th e specifications call for a one -year contract , with the Districts' option to renew for an additional one year period . Three bids were r ece ived, and the apparent low bidd e r is Georgia Pacific Corporation at $112 .70 pe r ton . (e ) Purchase of Engine Analyzing Equipment Unit, Six 4-Wheel Electric Cars, One 1/2-To n Pickup Truck, Three 1-Ton Fl at Bed Trucks, Fou r 1-Ton Cab and Chassis, and One 16,ooo lb . GVW Truck with Articulated Hyd raulic Crane -The purchase of · this equipme~t was -includ e d in t his year 's budget , and eight of the equipment items are r epl acements . A bid tabulation is included with the agenda material . (f) Purcha se of Modified Heads and Manifolds for Waukesha Sludge Gas Engin es -The staff is recommending that the negotiat e d exchan ge and purchase of parts for the sludge gas e ngines be approved (see enclosed memo - randum f rom the Districts ' Maintenance Superintendent). -2 - No. 15 -Report and Recommendation of the General Counsel Pertaining to the Award of Job No . P2 -21, Digesters N and o. On November 21, the Districts opened bids for the construction of t wo additional digesters at Treatment Plant No . 2 . These structures will be built in the digester complex at the plant as a par t of the 1971 -72 State and Federal Grant construction p r ogram. State and Federal authorities have approved 80% funding of the project. This matter, however, has been referred to the General Counsel since these facilities will be constructed withi n 1 ,000 yards of the ocean, which means we may be subject t o the provisions of Proposition 20, the recently-adopted Con- sti tutional Amendment affecting development along Californi a 's coast l ine . Mr . Nisson will report at· the meet i ng . No . 1 6 -Proposed Change in Clean Water Grant Program -The State Water Resources Control Board is considering a change in the i r Grant regulations which would establish restrictions on the size of facilities to be constructed to existing needs plus f i ve years of growth in "critical air areas". If this regulation i s adopted as proposed , most of Southern California will be a ffected and serious financial burdens may be placed on our taxpayers as a result. It has been suggested by several managers of other water and wast ewat e r agencies in Orange County, that a unifi ed position pap er b e prepared suggesting an alternative to the proposed regulation change which would be mo re equitabl e and still accomplish the results desired by the State Board . The Districts' Executive Committee has requested that the staff p r epare a report for the Boards on this matter to be presented at Wednesday 's meeting . District No . i1 No . 25 -Approving Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company re: Newland-Hamilton Pump Station Site -The staff r ecommend s that an easement be g ranted to the Southern California Edison Company to install underg round utilities behind the curb line of the improved street at the Dis trict 's Newland -Hamilton Pump Station site . The grant of this easement - will insure that in the event improvements or additions are mad e at the pump station which conflict with the Edison Company's utilities, they will be r e locat ed at no cost to the District . Districts Nos . 5 and 6 No . 30 -Oversizing Pacific Coas t Highway Sewer Crossing to S erve Hoag Hospital and Surrounding Area .-I n June of this year, the Boar ds of Dis trict s Nos . 5 and 6 authoriz e d the ne gotiation of an agreement f or the oversizing of a Coast Highway Sewer crossing in connection with replacement of a -3- portion of the Districts ' Trunk A in the Coast Highway . If an agreement can be consummated, a distinct savings can be reali zed by the Districts inasmuch as we would be paying onl y for the overs izing of the sewer . The proposed construction is contemplated to be done by the contractor for the Districts' Contract No . 5 -1 9, which is presently under construction . The work involves the install ation of 350 feet of 24-inch pipe , 80 feet of which must be jacked under the Coast Highway . The Change Order tot als app r oximately $32,000 . The Districts' share would amount to approximately $12,000, with District No. 5 paying 87% and Dis trict No . 6 13%. The entire matter is pending a deci sion of Hoa g Hospital officials . Hopefully, this will be resolved by Wednesday 's Board meeting . District No . 6 No. 35 -November 8th Joint Meeting Agenda Items -At the November 8th meeting of the Joint Boa r ds, D is~rict No . 6 Directors were unable to act on Joint items because of the lack of a quorum . It is recommended that the action appearing on the agenda be approved which covers the Joint meeting items that we~e app r oved by the other Sanitation Districts on Novembe r 8th. District No . 2 No. 39 -Status Re port on Anahe im Hi ll s Annexation -To date_, .the propon e nts of this annexation have not r e turne d executed copies of the agreements authorized by the Board ; therefore, this annexation has not been finalized . If the annexation fees , or in this case the executed agreements, are not submitted to the District by Dec embe r 29th, the annexation fees will incre ase. Attached to the agenda are copies of letters to the proponents advising them of this situation . No . 40 -Employment of Appraiser for Contract No . 2 -14 - Inc l uded in the agenda material is a letter from the General Counsel recommendin g the employment of Everett S . Schmid as appraiser fo r the Distri ct in the acquisition of rights of way for the cons truction of Contract No . 2 -14 . Mr . Schmid's per diem rate is $15 .00 per hour. No . 41 -Change Order to Contract No . 2 -14-1, Santa Ana River Interceptor, Sully -Miller Contrac tin g Company , Contract or . This Change Order has been r equ ested by the contractor to i ncrease the s i ze of the lined concr ete pipe from 72 -inch to 78-inch at no additional cost to the District . It is the staff 's r e commendation t hat the Change Order be approved . No . 44 -Adjournment -It is recommend ed that the Boa rd adjourn to 7:30 p .m., December 20th, wh i ch is the date se lected by the Boa rd to conduct public hearings on the proposed Connection Charge Ord inance (Ordinance No . 203). -4- Di s trict No . 7 Nos. 45, 46 and 47 -Annexations Nos . 26, 27, and 30 -The fees have been received on t hese pending annexations which have been previously approved by the Board of Directors. It is recommended that res o lutions be adopted to complete the annexa - tion proceedings . . No. 48 -Status Report on Proposed Annexation No . 28, Tract No. 7389 -The proponents of this annexation have not submitted the fe es to complete this proposed annexation to the Dis trict . Enclosed for the Di rectors' informat i on is a copy of a letter from the District to the proponent, advising that the annexation · fees will increase on January 1, 1 97 3. District No . 3 No . 52 -Addendum No . 1 to Contract No . 3 -17-1 Trunk Sewer, Reach , an Bo s a Avenue S orn Drain or e Ci y of Westminster) -This contract provides for the construction of a 33 -inch sewe r in Bolsa Avenue from Newland to Magnolia in the City of Westm~nster . In addition , the contractor will install, as a part of the contract, a storm drain for the City of Westminster . The contract will b e administered by Di strict No . 3o This addendum is merely a clarification of ASTM specifi - cations . No . 54 -Further Consideration of Routing of Knott Interceptor . At a special meeting of the District Board on De c e mb er 7 , the action concerning the routin g of the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No . 3 -18 through the City of Westminster was deferred t o December 13 pending investigation of a possible route adjacent to the Southern Pacific railroad tracks in the vic inity of Hoover and Hazard Avenues . The engineers have been directed to analyze and prepare an es timate for this newly-s u ggested route for the Boa rd's consideration . No. 55 -Ad j ournment -It is recommended that the Board adjourn to January 3rd which is the time specified for a pub lic hearing on the District 's proposed Connection Charge Ordinance (Ordinance No . 303). FAH:j Fred A . Harper Genera l Manage r 1-\. ~ ~ f I I ;. ~ r ~ . ' I . '·. ! i ~: .. . I , . I J. •. I : ~ l I~, n I. ! n .!" ... -. '.... ... . . Wl\TEU" GRM~T PRC1GR1.J.l F£GULl\T!()NS pcBed ser.v1ce areat (a) or addition which would net increilsE· .. 1')t 11 b<?yund~ the. capAci.tt indJ.cute-d in tha follo'td.119 tllhle: l. mgcI. or. 2 m9d· · 3 xr.gd lese:.: • 1.'o'tc.ll Bli qible: · £~12..ac~ ty· i.imi:t;: .• 4 ll'qd::. 5-m~u or 4.0 3.5 3 ... 0 2.5 2 .. 0 nx" "x"· ttx" UXA ".K"' I' .!· : ~l};\\•). .... .::· •• -·.#:~·~-~~--"5··J~.J.· -·· ---• ··~ . . .• t •·••• ··-·,~·1···;~-,.-:··:-.·· ··.:. i. Jfw~~t··:'.~.7 .~ , . ....... ~ . ?~. ,~'(;yond t~1~~--~~r:.~-~~ .. ~i. -~~q~·?~t~·~:J }Q y~·n:::~--h~n~ .. , ~rf/~-~~/~~:/{'·:~.~-: un~~:j/~~ .. ~· .. ~--·-~lii(;)Jc_:·Jc r. i ·; --~;~~·;~~-;~-~{{f{;"ffi;~):·: "Q;;<Y~p~({ th~t;: ~bpropr·i~~tvly ·:· .. _~·---~~ -~ .. i~_.,,, .... ,.,. .•· "I ••• • • • . . . ,..,... ·-·· •• ·-. • ............. "-\.. ........... ·:: •• · :·:: '.· .. •• --·.. :-· .••• ·::_ •••. : . ,.. ..• ·. ·.: • . ..... ~ ·-:.--.~· ' .• ·•·.· [ desi~ed hea(.'wMk foci litfo~-~C> a¢¢¢fft1'110datu :t"C~¢1\chlo I ' !. '.·-"'. · · ftrroc~~t vxpan::;ion shnll be consi1ered m1 eligibla r.ro-· . -1-· I . RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS December 13, 1972 -7:30 p.m. WARRANT NO. 19224 19225 19226 l9227 __)228 ""!9229 19230 19231 19232 19233 19234 19235 19236 19237 19238 19239 19240 19241 19242 19243 19244 19245 19246 19247 19248 19249 19250 19251 19252 19253 19254 19255 19256 19257 19258 19259 19260 19261 19262 19263 19264 19265 19266 19267 19268 19269 19270 19271 19272 19273 19274 19275 19276 9277 ~9278 19279 19280 19281 19282 19283 19284 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Advance Electric, Rewind Motor $ All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings American Compressor Co., Compressor Parts City of Anaheim, Power Anaheim Spring Co., Springs Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Technical Manual Apco Supply, Electric Supplies & Valves Bank of America; Bond & Coupon Collection Barton Sales, Metering Equipment Bearing Specialty Co., Bearings Bell Pipe & Supply Co., Pump Parts Bell's Radiator Service, Truck Repair Bird Machine Co., Centrifuge Parts & Freight Black & Decker Mfg. Co., Tool Repair Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Magneto Repair Brenner Fiedler & Associates, Inc., Compressor Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams C & R Reconditioning Co., Engine & Pump Repairs Cal Glass For Research, Inc., Lab Supplies Cal's Cameras, Inc., Photo Supplies & Equipment California Collator Sales, Printing Supplies Certified Laboratories, Solvent Chemtech Industries, Inc., Cleaner Coast Auto Service Center, Truck Tires College Lumber Company, Inc., Building Materials & Hardware Concrete Tie, Building Materials Consolidated Elect. Distr., Inc., Electric Supplies Constructors Supply Co., Tools, Hardware & Supplies Control Specialists, Inc., Regulator Parts Paul A. Cooper, Grit Removal Copeland Motors, Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Truck Parts County of Orange, Maps _ County Sanitation District No. 2 of L.A. County, Disposal Fee Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage Daily Pilot, Subscription·& Bid Notices C.R. Davis Supply Co., Hose John M. Deck, Equipment Parts DeGuelle & Sons Glass Co., Equipment Mtce. Del Chemical Corp., Lubricants Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling Diesel & Gas Turbine Progress, 'l'echnical c.Tournal Ducommun Metals & Supply Co., Engine Parts Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies & Equipment Electric Supplies Distributing, Electric Supplies Electronic Balancing Co., Equipment Repair Enchanter, Inc., Oc~an Research & Monj.toring (MO 12-14-66) Envirotech Corp., Diffuse.r Etalon Co., Equipment Repair Fairfax Electronics,·-Inc., Communication Equipment Fischer & Porter Co., Metering Supplies & Equipment William Fox, Employee Mileage Freeway Machine & Welding Shop, Machining (MO 2-9-72) Fremont Bag, Drum & Salvage Co., Bags City of Fullerton, Water GAF Corp., Blueprint Repair Garden Grove Lumber & Cement, Building Materials General Electric Supply Co., Electric Supplies General Telephone Co. Georgia-Pacific Corp., Chlorine Harlows Clocks, Equipment Repair A-1 AMOUNT 746.86 162.54 491.66 12.42 72.46 19.25 241.64 18.99 337.16 417. 57 137 .66 32.00 207.63 11.75 263.33 270.87 101.50 3,034.50 93.30 687.97 24.19 81.00 32.00 308.98 954.97 41.58 637.13 747.76 87.89 1,008.00 20.29 249038 7.00 66.40 31.86 38.37 75.28 19.03 29.07 147.29 85.00 7.50 107.98 350.84 284.47 75.00 2,377.50 78.61 20.50 49.35 1,270.72 16.,50 1,338.00 144.90 1-t .97 19~20 69.30 1,114.82 201.63 3,566.07 15.50 WARRANT NO. 19285 19286 19287 19288 19289 19290 "'9291 ~292 19293 19294 19295 19296 19297 19298 19299 19300 19301 19302 19303 19304 19305 19306 19307 19308 19309 19310 19311 19312 19313 19314 19315 19316 19317 19318 19319 19320 19321 19322 19323 19324 19325 19326 19327 19328 19329 19330 19331 19332 19333 19334 19335 19336 19337 19338 19339 .,9340 ~341 19342 19343 19344 19345 19346 19347 IN FAVOR OF Harrington Industrial Plastics, Plastic Pipe $ Hertz Equipment Rental Corp., Equipment Rental & Tools Higgins Trucks, I~c., Freight Hilti Fastening Systems, Hardware Honeywell, Ince, Electric Motor Howard Supply Co., Pipe Supplies, Tools & Hardware Pamela I. Huffman, Employee Mileage Hundley Company, Inc., Electric Supplies & Motor City of Huntington Beach, Water Industrial Wate~ Conditioning, Laboratory Water Inland Nut & Bolt Co., Hardware International Business Machines, Office Supplies International Harvester Co., Truck Parts Kar Products, Inc., Hardware Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies Kelco Sales & Engineering Co., Hardware King Bearing, Inc., Couplings, V-Belts & Bearings Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts Kleen Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware & Hose LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tools & Hardware L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Rental Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Brushes Larry~s Bldg. Materials, Inc~, Building Materials Judy Lee, Employee Mileage A.J. Lynch & Co., Freight R.W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., Paving Materials John Herbert McCullough, Employee Mileage McMaster-Carr Supply Company, Engine Parts Marine Biological Consultants, Ecological Research (MO 8-12-72) Matheson Scientific, Lab Supplies Moore Products Co., Electric Supplies National Lumber & Supply, Inc., Building Mate1'1ials Nelson-Dunn, Inc., Regulators C1ty of Newport Beach, Water Newport Stationers, Office Supplies C. Arthur Nisson, Retainer & Legal Services Noland Paper Company, Inc., Reproduction Supplies M.C. Nottingham Co., Sewer Lateral Repair Occidental College, Ecology Trawls Orange County Blueprint Co., Reproduction Orange County Radiotelephone Orange County Stamp Co., Rubber Stamps Orange Valve & Fitting Cop, Pipe Supplies Osterbauer Compressor Service, Compressor Parts Pacific Pumping Co., Pump Parts Pacific Telephone Ronald Parker, Employee Mileage Norman Parsons, Employee Mileage M.C. Patten & Co., Inc., Gauges Pence Pharmacy, Ecological Research Supplies Postmaster, Postage Lee Potter Company, Inc., Maintenance Supplies Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage The Regents of the University of Calif., EIS Conference San Valle Tile Kilns, Building Materials Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Rewind & Repair Santa Ana Electronics Co., Electric Supplies Santa Ana Tent & Awning Co., Hardware Scientific Products, Lab Supplies City or Seal Beach, Water S.F. Serrantino, Employee Mileage A-2 AMOUNT 137.88 56 .08 7.60 33.80 51~76 1,870.38 13.05 124.70 7.42 40 .O·J 309.97 68.44 81.97 138.26 1,048.56 106 .65 184 .. 98 623.58 319.32 371 .. 20 753.50 1,586.76 116.14 26.78 19.95 11.40 283.50 83.46 16 .52 559.64 1,206.99 52.59 90.40 !~74 .68 17. 21+ 295.32 950.00 c::. c::.9 ../ . ./ 125.00 375.00 21.53 74.19 19.92 157 .41 82.69 610.14 390.87 20.40 12.60 97.61 18.54 350.00 277.54 52.74 40.00 78.75 165.97 1,330c86 89.09 67.20 96 .. 31 26.23 21 .. 00 WARRANT NO. 19348 19349 19350 19351 19352 19353 1 9354 ~355 19356 19357 19358 19359 19360 19361 19362 19363 19361~ 19365 19366 19367 19368 19369 19370 19371 19372 19373 19374 19375 19376 19377 19378 19379 19380 19381 19382 19383 19384 19385 19386 19387 19388 19389 19390 19391 19392 19393 19394 19395 ....,,9396 19397 19398 19399 19400 19401 19Ll.02 19403 19404 IN FAVOR OF Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies So Cal Sign Co., Signs South Orange Supply, Pipe Supplies Southern Calif. Edison Southern Calif. Gas Co. Southern Calif. Water Co. Sparkletts, Bottled Water Speed-E Auto Parts, Truck Parts $ Standard Oil Co. of Calif., Fuel, Oil, Thinner & Gasoline John W. Stang Corp., Equip. Rental & Pump (MO 6-14-72) Starow Steel, Steel Stewart-Warner Alemite Sales Co., Tools T & H Equipment Company, Inc., Tractor Parts Technical Book Co., Training Manuals 39 Stake & Building Supplies, Building Materials Thomas Bros. Maps, Atlas Margo Thomson, Employee Mileage Tinker & Rasor, Equipment Repair Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Steel Harry L. Twining, Employee Mileage Two Guys Departm.en.t Store, Hardware AMOUNT 412. 56 141075 135-94 10,040.31 1,634.12 3.78 96.31 579.68 1,731.58 5,203.87 720.80 24.22 43.63 17.01 110.53 51.04 10.80 16.00 225 .85 30090 56 052 551. 5r( 25.39 92.58 64.67 26.00 216.30 20.00 445.67 76.90 1,104.61 596.00 52.02 74.00 840.00 171.99 355.83 U.S. Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts Union Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline Utilities Supply Co., Hardware & Tools Vaniman Camera, Photo Supplies & Processing Wallace Trade Bindery Co., Office Supplies John Waples, R.S., Odor Consultant Water Pollution Control Federation, WPCF Conf. (MO 12-13-72) Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc., Engine Parts Robert A. ·Webber, CWPCA Workshop Expense · Wilson Engine & Equipment Co., Filters & Engine Parts World Travel Bureau, Inc .. , AMSA"& FWPC.A Mtg. Travel Exp. Donald James Wright, Employee Mileage James Wybenga, CWPCA Workshop Expense Xerox, Reproduction Equipment Charge Zodiac Paper Co., Printing Supplies Fred A. Harper, Various Mtg & COD Expense Hanson, Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester, .Audit Services City of Placentia, Reimbursement for AM.SA Ocean Dlsposal Meeting (MO 9-13-72) TOT.AL JOINT OPERATING CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Ace Automotive Equipment Co., Automotive Equipment Carollo & Keith, Survey I-8 3,390.40 182.25 69,487.92 236.25 1,680.00 65,943.,70 John Carollo Engineers, Englneering-Plant Constr. Daily Pilot, Bid Notice .A-064, .A-065, A-066, E-066, E.T.I. & Kordicl\:, Contractor I-8-3 & P2-ll-l Eastman, Inc., Office Equipment A-063 22.60 James E. Hoagland & Hoagland Engr. Co., Contr. Pl-9-1 R.C. Hoffman Co., Samplers E~064 (MO 9-13-72) Hopper Service Parts Co., Tools Kordick & Rados, Contractor I-8 Motorola, Inc., Conununication Equipment Newport Stationers, Office Equipment County of Orange, Compaction Tent I-8 Osborne Laboratorien, IncR, Pipe Test I-8-3 Sparkletts, Water Containers Sun Electric Corp., Test Equipment Twining I:iboratoraies, Testing P2-}.J -1 & I-8-3 Utilities Supply Company, ToolR TOTAL CAPITAL OUTL;Y REVOLVING TO'rAL JOINT OPERATIHG & CORF A-3 $ $ 148,521.08 1,058.79 6,723.00 8,080.80 384.05 69,211.93 1,381.35 310.80 82.90 325.00 lll~ .. 45 1,209.60 77.80 276.15 ... .__ -- ~,r7;:::. J 'JB , 7 J --·, ~-• -"· ' --------·------·-·- DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 19405 Lowry and Associates, Engr. Serv., Annex. Fees & Conn. Fees Policy $ 500.00 19406 19407 19L~o8 19409 19410 19411 191+12 19413 19414 19415 19416 19417 19418 19419 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Lowry and Associates, Engr. & Survey, 2-14-1 & 2-14-2, Printing Project Report 2-14-2 Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Pipe Testing 2-14-1 Sully Miller Contracting Co., Contractor 2-14-1 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering & Survey, 3-17 & 3-18 Freedom Newspapers, Inc., Bid Notice 3-17-1 State of Calif., Div. of Highways, Road Repair 3-16 DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Survey 3-17 County of Orange, Compaction Test 3-17 Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Pipe Testing 3-17 J. F. Shea Co., Inc., Contractor 3-17 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF City of Newport Beach, Connection Fee Collection FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Newport Pools, Connection Permit Refund DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND WARRAN':CS IN FA\TOR OF Osborne La~oratories, Inc., Pipe Testi~g 5-19 A0 G~ Tutor Co.,Inc., & N. M. Saliba Co., Contr. 5-19 ·-·B- $ 24,773.62 1,975.00 98,521.20 $ 125,269.82 $ 125,769.82 $ 15,514.25 78.75 203.59 15,796.50 $ 352.50 201.18 2,250.00 200,329.20 $ 203,132.88 $ 2,566.12 $ 77.50 $ 2,643.62 $ 2,'.:60.00 107,774.55 110,724.55 ! DISTRICT NO. 7 WARRANT NO. OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 19420 19421 19422 1~23 19424 19425 19426 19427 19428 Boyle Engineering, Engr. Service & Printing A.Do#9 C. Arthur Nisson & Jack J. Rimel, Legal Serv., A.D,#9 Ivan Swanger, Orange County Treasurer, A.D.#9 Bond State of State of State of Wellputt California, Board of Equalization, Annex. Processing Fee California, Board of Equalization, Annex. Processing Fee California, Board of Equalization_, Annex. Processing Fee & Okazaki, Road Repair FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Bo-Mar Construction Company, Contractor 7-5-lR Boyle Engineering, Survey 7-5-lR & 7-2C-2 & 7-2D-6 -C- #26 #30 #27 AMOUNT 1,316.70 348.44 360.00 36.00 41.50 90.28 562.00 $ 2,754.92 $ 53,967.60 2,526.00 $ 56,493.60 $ 59,248.52 T cou:ay S:\::rL\Tlc: DIST!~ICTS o:,-.: O?~.\::cr. ccu~:TY P. 0. Eox SJ.27 -lOo·t·~ Ellis ,\venue l;ountain Valley, Caliiornia gz7os KORDICK & RADC:S: ~'\. Jo5 nt Vent1u:n JOB: ____ ~~~~I~t~~T~E~R~P~L~A~N~T--=I~N~F~l~iu~JE~l1~JT=-=I~T~-J~~L·E~iR~C~E~P~T~O~~R~,~J~O~B:-k..N~O~,~r~-~8~~~~~~--~~~~--- Amount of this Ch~ngc Order (ADD) J{J'.1I:JlXH}'.1~X $8,682.17 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the ;.: o nYr a c t an cl Io r contra c t ,,.. or k a r c her c b )' au t. ho r i z c c.1 an U. a s co r:1pc1, s a t i o :a therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. . .. References: Unit prices for unanticipated work, contractor's invoices to the Districts dated July 25, 1972 and November 21, 1972 ADD The Contractor was directed to place additional bedding material due to deep layers of peat from Station 199+95± to Station 208+45±. The peat in this area reached a . depth of as much as 7-feet below the pipe making a total of 839 cubic yards additional bedding at a unit cost bid. price of $7.50/cu.yd. ; The Contractor was directed to construct a 48-itich ID manhole behind the curb and fence of the Districts' Plant No. 1 property on Ellis Avenue, and 40-feet of 8-inch VCP sewer from the manhole at Station 247+14~. This work is to faci~itate the connection of· the plan- ned Districts' facilities to the sewer. ADD $6,292.50 ADD ·2, 005. 39 The Contractor was directed to remove a large block of concrete found at Station 196+30± which was encountered in the tunneling operation at the Fountain Valley Channel. Board authorizQtion date: . 'ecember 13, 1972 ~· CAROLLO & KEITH Agenda Item #13(a) ADD 384.28 TO+AL ADD $8,682.17 Original Contract Price $ 6,387.511 .00 Prev •. Au th. Changes $ __ 7"-8~, 6;::...a..._,O~. 8~.4~-- CO' s 2, 3, 4 & 5 This Change (ADD) X12XJ2}11';;~ $ __ _;8::....;·~6...;:;;8~2:...;...-=1 .... 7_· __ A~cndc<l Contract Price -D- Approved: cou:~TY SA~~ITXfim~ DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By ______ __,.~~~~-------~-....-----DepITty Chic r .r.:.ns: inc(:: KORDICK & RJ:..DOS, A Joint Venture All Districts T TO: FROM: C L A I M F 0 R DAMAGES Sanitation Districts of Fountain Valley Mr. and Mrs. Henry Gomez 10448 Crane Circle Fountain Valley, California Relating to incident on date of September 28, 1972 at 11:00 PM. 1969 Pontiac completely totalled out by water submerging on Ellis and Los Flores. I submit my claim for damages to my car, work, etc., ect. 1969 Pontiac Tow Service Storage (fluctuating figure) Goodyear Damage to Boots One Sweater Shirt One pair of trousers Loss· of work Rental of car necessary for two job transportation @ $55.00/week (present total of 8 weeks) (fluctuating figure) Police Report No. DR72-4717. Including any other expenses incurred. November 22, 1972 $2,200.00 60.00 60.00 164.91 55.00 15.00 12.00 24.95 25.50 440.00 Agenda Item #13(b) -E-All Districts r ./ ~-lcY~) f:_CU ~l) , .. CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY CALIFORNIA 92708 CITY HALL (714) 962-2424 November 16, 1972 Orange County Sanitation District P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attn: Mr. Bruce Witcher Gentlemen: Attached is a copy of an invoice submitted to Kordick & Rados for damages caused by the water line break that occurred at Ellis Avenue and Las Flores Street. We have been contacted by their insurance company representative, who states that they were not fully insured for construction failures. The exact amount that they have agreed to pay has not been determined at this time. We request, before final payment is made to Kordick & Rados, that the amount of $2,010.14 be retained from the final payment until the claim from the City is settled. Very truly yours, CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY 1Jt?,i;1--~ J_/),;-h-i,'vv_ WayT)~ S. Osborne Director of Public Works WSO:ps Enclosure ......... ,._-.. . ~~-­ ." ·1 , AgeBda Item #13(b) F-1 All Districts ( INVOICE ( c:.., i:" ('\ INV. NO. ..J I v U CITY Ot-1-0UNTP..JN VALLE'f TO: ._ ... : ' ...... # ' ... -. -· .. . r~rrlick & r\.:!d.oo ~. 10200 SLATER AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 TE LE PHONE 952-2424 8BCO !!..~d.lton /,"'.re!!ue !fan.i:.bgtcn E~ch,. C<llifoi:ni~ 92646 ' ~ "": -.... : . . . ·, DATE 0-~toher 16, 1972 PLEASE REFER TO INVOICE NUMBER IN ALL COMMUNICATIONS. :._.~ .•.• ·._.·-THIS INVOICE 15 DUE AND PAYABL_E ON PRES?-NTATION -NO STATEMENT WILL BE SENT ITEM ... -~ : .. ___ : ______ -· .•.. D f': _s ~ R I PT I 0 -~----·-·· ·--· -·· .. -· . ., ·---··· --··•·• ·--·. _. . ·1 Call-out of City forces due to "tmtcr t:'k?in break at cite·- of ~C"".7er lino co--uSttuction in Ellis J~vcnu~ th~ night of 9/29 /72: ~ · -~---~----:; ·· --··-~--···-'"-·--·· -·· · .. 9/29 Shut r..3in <lown· tu1d cloae road··· 9/30 Labor _E<f\lipn~ t::ihor . .Etr'1iJmen t '~te:dttl~ · 10/1/-Repeir ~tors '1aich uere stuck due to snnd entering lines ~;:or-~ br~k .. Labor Equipoent 10/2 ..... ROpair ad.di tional t:.eters Libt>c ~r-~ent ---.. :---;· . - ----· -~ ---·-·-··-· Suh-tot:ll. · Plus 15% O.lL ··-...... Pli:s ~n1te.r ·lost c!_:e to br~ (3.294/\gallcns) ~AKE REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY AND ENCLOSE THIS STUB MARK ATTENTION OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT CITY OF ,FOUNTAIN VALLEY ! ·:. " . ' ., . · .• 10.?00!SLATER AVENUE .. • FOUNT.AIN VALLEY, CALIF. FORM F-2:!15 , ~ r. DEPARn .. f~NT Age~da Item #13(b) F-2 A/C CREDITED A.MOUNT . $ .. · 93.13 /~1r.70 362.13 380~CO 155.75 72 .. 50 15 .. 00 27.CO 12 .. CQ. ~l,167.21 175.03 __£57.35_ $2 .. 010 .. 1{:. HT./vr INVOICE NO. 5 7 5 0 AMOUNT ~ ___ 2_,_0_1_0_. _1_4_ !~633-405-19~ CREDIT A/C _______ _ All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 72-161 AWARDING PURCHASE CONTRACT FOR SUPPLYING CHLORINE IN ONE TON CYLINDERS, SPECIFICATION NO. C-005 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING PURCHASE CONTRACT FOR SUPPLYING CHLORINE. IN ONE TON CYLINDERS, SPECIFICATION NO. C-005 * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recormnendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Director of Operations & Laboratories that award of purchase contract be made to Georgia-Pacific Corporation for SUPPLYING CHLORINE IN ONE TON CYLINDERS, SPECIFICATION NO. C-005, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That said contract for Specification No. C-005 be awarded to Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Supplier, in the amount of $112.70 unit price per ton, furnished and delivered, in accordance with the terms and conditions of said specification; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a purchase contract with said supplier to supply chlorine pursuant to the specifications and purchase contract documents therefor; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 13, 1972. Agenda Item #13(d) G-1 All Districts B I D TABULATION SHEET Date DECEMBER 6 , 197 2 ll:CO A.M. Contract For: SUPPLYING CHLORINE IN ONE TON CYCLINDERS SPECIFICATION NO. C-005 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 8. CONTRACTOR Georgia-Pacific Corporation City of Commerce, California Jones Chemicals, Inc. Torrance, California Continental Chemical Company Sacramento, California Stauffer Chemical Company Los Angeles, California PPG Industries, Inc. Whittier, California TOTAL BID PER TON $112.70 116.99 119.95 No Bid No Bid It is recommended that award be made to Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Chemical Packaging Division, 2425 Malt Avenue, City of Commerce, California, the lowest and best~ Ted A. Dunn Director of Operations and Laboratories Agenda Item #13(d) G-2 All Districts B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N SHEET Date DECEMBER 6' 1972 11:00 A.M. Contract For: ONE ( 1) ENGINE ANALYZING EQUIPMENT UNIT DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR ENGINE DIAGNOSIS 1. 2. 4. SPECIFICATION NO. E-066 CONTRACTOR Sun Electric Corporation Maywood, California Sun Electric Corporation San Leandro, California Sun Electric Corporation Chicago, Illinois TOTAL BID $4,326.00 4,326.00 4,326.00 The engine analyzing equipment described in Specification No. E-066 is for use in the Districts' shop on all automotive engines and is necessary to meet the California state requirements on exhaust emissions. The unit is in common use in most dealerships and garages in Southern California and is accepted as meeting the requirements listed in Section 618a, Article 4, Title 13, oT the California Administrative Code. In preparing the specificatio~ other units manufactured by Marquette, Auto Scan, Allen, and Sun Electric were investigated. Our evaluation concluded that the equipment available through Marquette, Auto Scan and Allen were not comparable to Sun Electric for the following reasons: (1) Units are not individually circuit protected (2) components are interdependent, which means all must function or none at all (3) exhaust emission test units which are a critical part of the tune-up procedure are a separate add-on type or listed as accessories and not a part of the total system, making it difficult to correlate with other test functions. It is therefore recommended that the award be made to the local bidder, Sun Electric Corporation, 5255 Atlantic Boulevard, Maywood, California. 'l;(.'1.~ Maintenance Superintendent Agenda Item #13(e) -H-All Districts B I D TABULATION SHEET Date DECEMBER 6, iq72 11:00 A.M. Contract For: SIX (6) 4-WHEEL ELECTRIC CARS SPECIFICATION NO. A-063 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 8. CONTRACTOR Taylor-Dunn Mfg. Company Anaheim, California Dutch Stark Company Reseda, California Otis Material Handling Anaheim, California Westinghouse Electric Corporation Redlands, California TOTAL BID $ 9,032.63 9,166.50 10,067.40 10,426.50 It is recommended that award be made to Taylor-Dunn Mfg. Company, 2114 West Ball Road, Anaheim, California, the lowest and best bidder. v)/?2 e~/(.1(2 W. N. Clarke Maintenance Superintendent Agenda Item #13(e) -I-All Dlstricts BID TABULATION SHEET Date DECEMBER 6, 1 g72 11:00 A.M. Contract For: ONE (l) ·1/2-TON PICKUP TRUCK SfECIFICATION NO. A-064 l. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. CONTRACTOR International Harvester CoCTpany Anaheim, California Santa Ana Dodge Inc. Santa Ana, California McCoy Ford Ana~eim, California Peck Road Ford Truck Sales Whittier, California TOTAL BID $2,940.00 3,003.00 3,008.25 3,349.11 It is recommended that award be made to International Harvester Company, 1110 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California, the lowest and best bidder. vJ/ fJ1 (?~~r~--c W. N. Clarke Maintenance SuperintendP.nt Age~da Item #13(e) -J-All Districts B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N S H E E T Date: December 6, 1972 11:00 A.M. ~ntract For: THREE (3) 1-TON FLAT BED TRUCKS SPECIFICATION NO. A-065 1. 2. 3. 4. BIDDER Santa Ana Dodge Inc. Santa Ana, California International Harvester Anaheim, California McCoy Ford Anaheim, California Peck Road Ford Truck Sales Whittier, California TOTAL BID $11,299.05 11,434.50 11,405.22 12,445.52 LESS TRADE-IN* $800.00 900.00 -0- 400.00 NET BID $10,499.05 10,534.50 11,405.22 12,045.52 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * It is rec6mmended that award be made to Santa Ana Dodge Inc., 1401 North Tustin, Santa Ana, California, the lowest and best bidder. 'W''!l~ W. N. Clarke Maintenance Superintendent * Trade-Ins V-48 V-66 Agenda Item #13(e) -K-All Districts B I D ~ T A B U L A T I D N S H E E T Date: December 6, 1972 11:00 A.M. Contract For: FOUR (4) 1-TON CAB & CHASSIS SPECIFICATION NO. A-066 1. 2. 3. 4 . BIDDER International Harvester Anaheim, California Santa Ana Dodge Inc. Santa Ana, California McCoy Ford Anaheim, California Peck Road Ford Truck Sales Whittier, Califo:t;>nia TOTAL BID $13,230.00 13,440.00 13,426.68 15,057.92 LESS TRADE-IN* $1,200.00 1,000.00 -0- 400.00 NET BID $12,030.00 12,440.00 13,426.68 14,657.92 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * It is recommended that award be made to International Harvester Company, 1110 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California, the lowest and best bidder. IJ,/'(I, ~ W. N. Clarke Maintenance Superintendent * Trade-Ins V-36 V-37 V-46 V-47 Agenda Item #13(e) -L-Al1 Districts B I D TABULATION SHEET Date DECEMBER 6, 1972 11:00 A.M. Contract For: ONE ( 1.) 16, 000 lb. GVW TRUCK WITH ARTICULATED HYDRAULIC CRANE 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 7. 8. SPECIFICATION NO. A-067 CONTRACTOR Santa Ana Dodge Inc. Santa Ana, California International Harvester Company Anaheim, California McCoy Ford Anaheim, California Peck Road Ford Truck Sales Whittier, .California TOTAL BID $10,599 .. 75 10,605.00 10,843.86 11,274.66 It is recommended that award be made to Santa Ana Dodge Inc., 1401 North Tustin, Santa Ana, California, the lowest and best bidder. /}~ n {}le~.,_;__ W. N. Clarke Maintenance Superintendent Age~da Item #13(e) -M-All Districts December 5, 1972 MEMORANDUM TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. SOX 8!27 10844 ELLIS AVENUE .FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 FROM: William N. Clarke, Maintenance Superintendent SUBJECT: Purchase of Engine Parts Waukesha Motor Company, manufacturers of the V-12, 450 HP digester gas engines which drive the Districts' headworks pumps has developed improved cylinder head and manifold assemblies for their engines to provide increased cooling water circulation, and the use of hardened valve seats with a larger surface area for heat dissipation. It is estimated that utilization of these ne~ly designed heads and manifolds would reduce the frequency of overhaul on the eguipment from once every four months (3,000 running hours) to once every lt3 months (12,000 running hours). We have negotiated with the local representative, Waukesha Engine Servicenter, for the.purchase of 24 cylinder· heads and manifold assemblies. The list price for this equipment is $19,901.29. They have agreed to a discount of 15%, leaving a net of $16, 916 .10. They will also allm·1 a trade-in of $9,030.00 for our old heads and manifolds. This leaves a net difference of $7,886.10. It is my recommendation that we be authorized to purchase 24 cylinder heads and manifold assemblies for an amount not to exceed $8,000.00, plus tax and freight, from Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc., 1783 South Santa Fe Avenue, Compton, California. Agenda Item #13(f) -N-All Districts Engineer's Estimate: $1,200,000. BID TABULATION SHEET Date November 20~ 1972 -11:00 PJ..~ Contract For: DIG ESTERS "N" AND "011 AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-21 CONTRACTOR 1. Hemisphere Constructors, Inc. Bellflower 2. E.T.I. and Kordick, A Joint Venture Baldwin Park 3. Jrunes E. Hoagland co. Long Beach 4. J. Putnam Henck, a corporation and Henck Pro, a joint venture San Bernardino 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Agenda Item #20 -0- TOTAL BID $1,068,413. .$1, 090' 000. . $1, 091, 220. $1,129_,356. District 1 RESOLUTION NO. 72-162-1 APPROVING AWARD OF JOB NO. P2-21, DIGESTERS "N" AND 11 0 11 AT PLANT NO. 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AWARD OF DIGESTERS "N" AND "O" AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-21 *' * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by John Carollo Engineers, Districts' engineers, and concurred in by the Deputy Chief Engineer, that award of ·contract be made to Hemisphere Constructors, Inc., for DIGESTERS "N" AND ".O" AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-21, and the tabulation of bids and the proposal for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That award of contract to Hemisphere Constructors, Inc., in the total amount of $1,068f413.oo, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, be approved; and, Section 3. That the contract date for said work be established as December 28, 1972; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor; and, Section 5. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 13, 1972. Agenda Item #20 -P-District 1 RESOLUTION NO. 72-163-11 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF GRANT OF EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF GRANT OF EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated --------~------- , wherein County Sanitation District No. 11 grants to Southern California Edison Company a permanent easement to accomodate street improvements by the City of Huntington Beach in Newland Avenue; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That in consideration of said Grant of Easement, Southern California Edison Company shall pay to County Sanitation District No. 11, the sum of $250.00; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to execute said Grant of Easement in form acceptable to the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 13, 1972. Agenda Item #25 -Q-District 11 RESOLUTION NO. 72-166 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH HOAG HOSPITAL RE PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY SEWER A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH HOAG HOSPITAL FOR OVERSIZING PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY CROSSING * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated between County Sanitation District No. 5 and Hoag Hospital for oversizing Pacific Coast Highway crossing in connection with replace- ment of portions of Newport Beach Trunk A, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 5, acting for itself and as agent for District No. 6, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 13, 1972. Agenda Item #30 (a) -R-Districts 5 & 6 Items of joint business from November 8, 1972 meeting Page 1 of 2 November 8th Agenda Item No. 8 9 12 13 14(a) 14(b) 14(c) 14(d) 15 Agenda Item #35 Item Consideration of motion to receive and file Executive Cornmittee!s written report dated November 1, 1972. Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to appoint a staff member to participate on a joint technical advisory committee with the County Road Department, . Southern California Edison Company, Southern Counties Gas Company, San Diego Gas and Electric Company, Regional Water Quality Control Board, County Air Pollution Control District, and the State Air Resources Board, to study the feasibility of new methods for disposal of solid wastes, as recommended by the Executive Committee. Receive and file October 26th written report of Special Committee on State Board Ocean Policy. Consideration of Resolution No. 72-141, assuring the State Water Resources Control Board of a staged improved treatment program, enforcement of source control of pollutants, and establishing a timetable therefor. Consideration of motion to receive and file Annual Report submitted by Hanson, Peterson, Cowles and Sylvester, Certified Public Accountants, for the year ending June 30, 1972, previously mailed to Directors by auditors Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim, dated October 2, 1972, in the amount of $1,250.71 submitted by Southern California Edison Company in connection with construction of Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8 Consideration of Resolution No. 72-145-6, authorizing and directing execution and filing of documents necessary for Federal Grants under 33 U.S.C., 466 et seq. and State Grants under Clean Water Bond Law of 1970, for 1972-73 Joint Works Improvements and Additions. Consideration of motion to receive and file resolutions from the various cities to the Board of Supervisors requesting the Supervisors to improve portions of the Santa Ana River to mitigate the potential inundation of Districts' Treatment Plants Nos. 1 and 2 in the event of flooding Consideration of motion to receive and file financial report of Director of Finance for quarter ending September 30, 1972. S-1 District 6 Items of joint business from November 8, 1972 meeting Page 2 of 2 Nove~nber 8th Agenda Item No. 16 17 18 19 20 26 Agenda Item #35 Item Consideration of Resolution No. 72-149, requesting permission of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, to submit a preliminary technical report as required by the State Water Resources Control Board's Water Quality control Plan for the Ocean Waters of California, by January 15, 1973, with submission of final report on or before January 1, 1974. Consideration of motion authorizing enlargement of the scope of the 1972 Master Plan Report and Preliminary Design Study for future plant facilities and programs authorized February 9, 1972, to include preparation of a preliminary technical report to comply with the State Water Resources Control Board's Water Quality Control Plan for the Ocean Waters of California; and authorizing the General Manager to direct John Carollo Engineers to proceed with the preparation of said preliminary technical report in accordance with the terms of ~heir proposal dated January 18, 1972, on a per diem fee basis in an additional amount not to exceed $20,700.00 Consideration of motion authorizing the Joint Chairman to appoint a Special Committee to interview prospective engineers for design of projects listed in Project Report No. 2 for 1972-73 Joint Works Improvements and Additions Consideration of motion to receive and file certification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving warrant books for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing payment of claims. Consideration of motion approving Districts 5 & 6 suspense fund warrants and authorizing payment of claims. S-2 District 6 City of Analw1m 204 East Lincoln Avenue Anahei~, California 92805 llove~ber 15, 1972 Attention: Hr. l\ei th A. !"~urdoch City !,i<.:mager Subject: Proposed Annexation No. 6 -Anaheim Hills Annexation ~·Io. 1 Enclor,cd hcre~ith please find copic~ of az.ree~ent providin~ for vaiver of annexation fees for ar2a contained in subject annexation encompassing the colf course and reservoir and providing th~t in the event any of the land for which fees have been waived requires sewer service, that portion to be so developed be required to pny a char~e equal to tlw th0n applicable District annexation fee n.nd any other i'ees in effect at that time. Please have all three copies executed on behalf of the City and return to the undersigned. One fully executed copy will be returned by the District. As you are aware, District No. 2's annexation fees are adjusted annually on Janua.ry 1st. It ia, therefore, inperative that the signed agreement be returned to this office prior to Decenber 6th in order to enable the Doard of Directors to take final action approving subject annexation at their ret;ular December rneeting .. JWS:rb Enclosures cc: Mr. Thornton E. Piersall --·· '"-"-·••" .. -.-.. -...J.--... ·-.-_ ............. -~-···'• •···-''"'""" _____ ..... '"'I----.. ~·-·----... . Ager:da Item #39 J. Wayne Sylvester Secretary of the Board of Directo:c's T-1 District 2 Anaheim Hills, Inc. 380 Anahein Hills Road Anaheim, California 92806 Novei.1ber 6, 1972 Attention: James Barisic, Vice President Subject: Azrcement providins for deferred payment of fees for An3.hcin Hills .l\:mcxation !·7o. 1 On October 18th we forwarded four copies of subject agreement for execution by Ananeim Hills, Inc.· and Tc~aco Ventures, Inc. In order that the Board ~ay consid8r final approval of Annexation :Jo. G -Anahein Hills j1.nnexation Jo. l to the District, it vill be necessary that ~c have the fully executed agreei;1ent no later than Dece:nber 7th. As you }:now, District lio. 2 1 s annexation fees are adjusted annually on January 1st. It is, therefore, essential that this matter be completed by the December 13th meeting of the Board of Directors. JWS:rb Agel)da Item #39 J. Wayne Sylvester Director of Finance T-2 District 2 CLARK MILLER C. ARThUR NISSON NE:LSON KOGLER H. LAWSON MEAD MILLER, NISSON S KOGLER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2014 NORTH BROADWAY SANTA ANA, CALIFOR.N It\ 92706 December 4, 1972 Fred Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Post Off ice Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Fred: Re: Right of Way Acquisition for County Sanitation District No. 2 re 2-14 In· order to negotiate and acquire the right of way required in this Contract, it will be necessary to employ an appraiser to assist. I am requesting that you ask the Board to authorize the employment of Everett s. Schmid, whose office is at 1617 East 17th Street, Suite 18, Santa Ana, California 92701. His telephone number is 558-1855. Everett is not an MF~I appraiser, however, he has been appraising property for attorneys and banks. He TELEPHONE AREA CODE 714 542-6771 has also worked with Cedric W'hi te, who is an .MAI appraiser, in the matter of preparation and work-up of information. I believe he is sufficiently qualified as an appraiser to serve our purposes and in the event that we are unable to negotiate settlement in the acquisition of the right of way, he can probably be used as a witness in Court. It may be that we will want to have an MAI in the event of a hotly contested court case, however, until we reach that point I believe our purposes will best be served by employing Mr. Schmid. The agreement that he is willing to make is to work for the Districts doing appraisal work as directed by me or the staff at the rate of $15.00 per hour. I am requesting you present this to the Board with a recommendation. CAN:ac Ae;enda Item #40 Yours very truly, /" ,,,.... ~ ....... (,,,.) _,, ) --/<:'0~--« .~ ·~~L_ C. Arthur Nissan General Counsel -U-District 2 P. 0. l~o x 0· 127 - 1 G ;~ -~ ·t E 11 is .:\ v c nu c Fountain Valley, California 92708 Cl IAI~GE O!Wl:R cc o. ;rn. 2 --------·----------SULLY -MILLER CONrrHACTING COI-'IPANY DATE Dece'.:lber 13, 1972 Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, From Reclamation Plant £Jo. 1 J 0 B: ----~t~o__.;;;.;K:;.;..a_...t;..,.;:;e~;;;;l:;.;;;;l;;:_;;a;.__,;:A..;;... ,.;....,e:;.;n;.;:.-1.;.;,.~-p.;;;..~ ...._, ~C..:::.o~n;...;:t.=..r...:;;;e.:_:c::;.-::t:..__::;,1'.;.;:'. o::...:•:_:;2;;;..,---1;::..l..!..+---1=----------------- Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 0.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the co,_.,ra~ ~ ~:-~d/ or contract ,~·or k arc her c by author~-z e;J . and as cor;-ipensa l.. ion therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. . .. REFERENCE: Contractor's letter to the District dated November 2, 1972 The Contractor shall install 78-inch diameter RCP in- stead of 72-inch diameter RCP specified for in the subject contract. Any additional expense for this change will be borne by the contractor and there will be no additional charge to ·the District. No additional time extension shall be granted for this Change Order. Original Contract Price Prev •. Auth. Ch~mges $ 6 _, 27 4 _, 608. LW $ 1, l-1-01, 504 .14 This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ ---~~~~~~~- 0.00 Board authorization date: December 13, 1972 Contractor Lowry & Associates Agertda Item #41 Amended Contract Price s 7' 676_,112. 54 -V- Approved: GOU !\TY SA~n 'L\ TI()~~ n I STRICT s 0 [ Orange County, California District 2 RESOLUTION NO. 72-111-7 ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 26) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, TRACT NO. 4733 ANNEXATION * ·* * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to County Sanitation District No. 7 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a petition filed by the majority property owners; and, Section 2. That, pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganiza- tion Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of said territory to County Sanitation District No. 7 by means of Resolution No. 71-148-7, filed with said Conunission by the District; and, Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Tract No. 4733 Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (Annexation No. 26)", the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 4. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and, Section 5. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and, Section 6. That provision for payment of annexation fees in the amount of $4,169.70 has been satisfied; and, Agenda Item #45 W-1 District 7 • r Section 7. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described hereinabove, be and it is hereby ordered annexed to County Sanitation District No. 7 without notice or hearing and without election. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 13, 1972. Agenda Item #45 W-2 District 7 H. LAWSON MEAD ATTORNEY AT LAW 2014 NORTH BROADWAY BANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706 542-6771 November 13, 1972 Board of Directors, County Sanitation Districts County Sanitation District #7 10844 Ellis Avenue P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Califo~nia 92708 Re: Proposed Annexation No. 27 (Mead) to County Sanitation District #7 Gentlemen: On behalf of Frank F. Mead, Nan M. Curran and Lolita Mahoney, who ·are the owners of approximately 120 acres which is the subject of the above-referenced annexation, I hereby request that your Board take final action to complete the annexation of this property to Sanitation District #7. As previously arranged, my clients have executed a note, secured by a deed of trust on their property, for payment of the annexation fees. This note will bear interest payable semi-annually, and the principal amount will be due in five years from the date of annexation or upon sale of any portion of the property, whichever event occurs first. It would be appreciated if final action could be taken before the end of this calendar year so as to save the property_ owners the anticipated 1973 increase in the annexation fees. Very truly yours, ~. ~ ~m" '\V~~Q-......... H. Lawson Mead HLM:cp Agenda Item #46 -X·-District 7 I . ( RESOLUTION NO. 72-51-7 ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DIS TRI Cl1 ( i!iEAD ANNEXATION - ANNEXATION NO. 27 1rO COUNTY SANITATION DIS11RICT NO. 7) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, OBnERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (MEAD' ANNEXATION -ANNEXATION NO. 27 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7) * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of .Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That, pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, application has heretofore been made to the Local Agenc·y F.onnation Commission for annexation of said territory to County Sanitation District No. 7, by means of a petition filed with said Commission by the property owners of the area to be annexed; and, Section 2. That the territory to be annexed in uninhabited; and, Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory proposed: to be annexed is Annexation No. 27 (Mead) to County Sanitation District No. 7, the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exh.lbit "B", attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 4. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory;. and, Section 5. That provisions for annexation fees in the amount of $44,486.64 have been satisfied by execution of a Straight Interest Bea.ring Note, payable within 5 years from date of approval of said a11nexation, secured by a Deed of Trust with Assignment of Rents, in a. form approved by the District's General Counsel; and, Agenda Item #46 Y-1 District 7 . ' Section 6. That,· as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division l(District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described hereinabove, be and it is hereby ordered annexed to County Sanitation District No. 7 without notice or hearing and without election. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 13, 1972. Agenda Item #116 Y-2 District 7 ... '. RESOLUTION NO. 72-165-7 ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 30 -TRACT 6232) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 30 - TRACT NO. 6232 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7) * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to County Sanitation District No. 7 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a petition filed by the property owner; and, Section 2. That, pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganiza- tion Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of said territory to County Sanitation District No. 7 by means of Resolution No. 72-97-7, filed with said Commission by the District; and, Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Tract No. 6232 Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (Annexation No. 30)," the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 4. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and, Section 5. That the reason for annexing said territory is to ~· obtain and provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and, Section 6. That provision for payment of annexation fees in the amount of $8,210.65 has been satisfied; and, Agenda Item #47 Z-1 District 7 Section 7. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation CorrJnission pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described hereinabove, be and it is hereby ordered annexed to County Sanitation Dist~ict No. 7 without notice or hearing and without election. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 13, 1972. Agenda Item #47 Z-2 District 7 • r" e Maridayle Thorapson Peay Exccut~ix of the Estate of l·~uj:··io;1 !..::. j-on'.)~, ,;_,ccca:.;cd 1925~} C.::1ap;-::.o.n .i-'~v~nu~ Cl'a~·.:L;c, C:i.lii'o1·ni:J. November 7, 1972 On Jltly :17, l:J 7 2, i;t..: adv:!. ::;2 c1 f ou t~1.J.t tt.c Lo.:;[J.l A~~Ui~Y ~o:-·na t ion Co:.~:,is0ior, lnd. D.p~.n-·ovcc:. ::a;.J~i set ~-~1lLu~1.::.tion :.u.-~ .... t ini'o::·::-.e:d :/ou of tht.-J.\.;03 tl1.;;lt ~·;ere c!~e bt::i'or:..: t'l1L . .:.l u.;i_)rov~11 ·c:,r Di.strict Jo. 7 could t~~:e pl::t.C•J. 'lo C.:ut~, :·re 11::.vc not h~:1rd. fro'1 :!ou cor:t;l'.7·1,nin:-= this ;;:(~tter. As you G.re :i:mre, Vif.;t;rict :;o. 7' !3 ar..u~~;:c:J.·i;ion £\!CD 3.X>t~ adj u~t~d nunu2lly on t.T<.lnuo.r~' l~~i-;. lblcss feG.3 arc tcn;..-:.9rcd. prior to that t1ate, the rw,·1 sciledulc '1d.ll &r.;ply to 3aid. anr,.c:rn.tion. JWS:rb cc: Evans & Associates, Inc. Agenda Item #48 J. Wayne Sylvester Secretary of t:·w i3oard of Dir·~cto:..,...s -AA-District 7 ,. ' .-. COUNTY SAN I TAT I or~ DISTRICT NO. 3 of Orange County, California ADDEtWUM NO. 1 to CONSTRUCT I or·J SPECIF I CAT I Ot~S AND PLANS for BOLSA RELIEF TRUtJK SE\./ER, REACH 10 CONTRACT NO. 3-17-1 and BOLSA AVENUE STORM DRAIN DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS Revise Section 112-2 to read as follows: 11 112-2 REllJFORCED Cat/CRETE PIPE All m~tcrials used in and the manufacture of reinforced concrete pipe shall. conform to the provisions of Standard Specifications for Reinforced Concrete Culvert, Storm Drain, and Sewer Pipe, ASTM Designation: C76. The Contractor shall furnish and install reinforced concrete pipe of diameters and D-load classifications as indicated on the plons.11 CH: l db 11-28-72 BC03-110-50 Con rad Hohene r, Jr. ; C. E. '" l 0951 Agenda Item #52 -BB-District 3 , EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF TI-TR REGULAR ·JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, Ca.llfurnia, 1t1ias held at the hour of ? : 30 p .m., December 13 , 1972 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.rn. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District's Board. * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 2 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., December 20, 1972. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:26 p.m., December 13, 1972. STATE OF CALIFORNIAl SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 13th day of December 19 72 ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 13th day of December, 1972. &nd S-107 EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR .JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIFECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORIUA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., December 13, , 1972 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District 1 s Board. DISTRICT 7 Adjournment * * * * * * * * * Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of 'Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 4:30 p.m., January 3, 1973. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10;42 p.m., December 13, 1972. STATE OF CALIFORNIA< COUNTY OF ORANGE ~ SS. • • I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary ~f each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, Califo~nia, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entri~ on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 13th day of December 19 72 13th S-107 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have day of December, 1972. 5 6 ' ' ' this • • • • • --··--~----··-·-·,-·-• ---• .,. -··-."~ ~~ ·-• •• ._.,._ v. •• r -....,.... EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF ~IRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY~ CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., December 13 , 1972 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District's Board. * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 3 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., January 3, 1973. The Chairman then declared the meeting· so adjourned at 10: 53 p·:m., December 13, 1972 . STATE OF CALIFORNIA~ SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitat~on Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 13th day of December 19 72 13th IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have day of December, 1972. , this • e oar s of Di~ectors tation Districts Nos . . • -:7 ... -and 11 S-107 .... ~ -. -...... ____ ..... - M-E-M-0 -R-A-N-D -U-M . -----···-··~-·-- TO Jean Mosher DA TE 12/12/72 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~--~~·~~- FROM J. Wa yne Sylvester SUBJECT ~~~~~~~~~~-~~- Re: December Executive Committee which will be held January 3rd Renewal of membership in CASA and AMSA DECEMBER 13, 1972 JOINT MEETING #6 -Report of the Joint Chairman Mr. Harper & Mr. Finnell met with Robert Sansom, Assistant Administrator of EPA in charge of air and water quality, a group of AMSA agencies , and representatives of larger dischargers on the Atlantic and West Coast , the last week in November in Washington regarding the definition of secondary ~reatment. While they didn 't turn them around, they did slow them down. EPA's staff was looking for a single definition of secondary treatment. It was Finnell's and Harper's impression that Sansom, who is an economist type, was receptive to looking at alternative means once he found out that the agencies had that kind of flexibility. Towards the end of the meeting he directed the staff to at least look at alternatives but did not make any commitments to any of the agencies there. Commissioner from New York City agreed with reasoning .of Pacific Coast agencies and said that he felt that what they were dumping into the Hudson had no resemblance to what we should do on the West Coast. He felt that the same kind of conditions should not be laid on the Pacific Coast agencies in view of where we · were discharging. Also met with Mr. White and ·assistant of Congressman Williams office . Thought they definitely got idea across that the Di stricts were not trying to drag their feet but had been a leader in setting higher pollution standards, but still couldn't see why we had to spend $105 million when same objectives could be met with $40 million. Result of that discussion was the direction from White to men in charge of budgets , etc. to get with Mr. Ruckelshaus and see if there is n 't some way to come up with alternative definitions of secondary treatment. A feasible alternative to look at re secondary treatment was idea of categories depending where recei~ing waters were or effluent was discharged. Griset asked if they were able to make any use at all out of the SCCWRP studies and Finnell said that they pointed out to Bob Sansom in trying to fortify our position that we weren't dragging our feet, that before there was an EPA, we had gone into this research project and that the results were just now starting to come in. Left first volume of SCCWRP report with them. Were backed up by LA City and LA _County on that point . #7 -Report of the General Manager ' FAH reported that while in Washington he talked to people there regarding a work shop that was to be in Detroit. Mr. Harper went to meeting in Detroit on 12/11. One of the AMSA people commented that the Districts were really on top of things. Talked to two gentlemen re secondary treatment. What they· proposed to have published in Federal Register on Friday would require activated sludge and probably car bon towers. Would rule out trickling filter secondary treatment plants such as what we have here now. Don't feel this is the intent of Congress, particularly if they go along with what the President has done on the funding program. Ruckelshaus announced that letter President was signing to impound $6 million of federal funds took more than half of the money out of the program. Discussionsled .~~. Harper to believe that this had been proposed by their staff so they would get a lot of input from agencies like ourselves . During formal discussions on panel (about 300 people) it was indicated that if we would comply with certain things, they would grant a waiver as they said before. Don't know what more will come out in Federal Register but .- -. p. 2 ·this is what we have to comment on. Don't know if it will be 10 or 15 days that we have to comment in. Many agencies are being contacted by telegram to send telegrams asking that this be deferred. Office of Management and Budgets is looking into this. Just won't fit into 1977 frame they are talking about. Al l of the discusaion waa about various segments of the Water Pollution Bill. Mr. Harper mentioned that there was some good news and that was that there is a clause in the bill on reimbursement which came about through the efforts of AMSA (which we help fund). This clause picks up projects not funded by federal govern- ment as far back as 1956. Will pay up to 30% of the funding from 1956-66 if project had state approval. Unfortunately, we did not apply then. However, on next phase from 1966-72, we only received 33% and now are eligible to go back and apply for 55% funding. $1.9 billion has been appropriated to take care of this type of funding. During 1966-72 we had over $15 million of work that were approved projects. We received $15 million and are eligible for close to $3.5 million. Will apply for it within the 12 month period from date Bill was approved (Oct. 18), as will other people throughout U.S. and $1.9 billion pie will be split among agencies that have applied. Won't get $3.5 million but maybe half of it. · Are a lot of ramifications to this Bill that we don't understand and a lot of the policy hasn't even been established by EPA administrators. Plan to continue to have these work shops and Mr. Harper indicated our association would put one on maybe in February in Los Angeles or San Francisco. Appears that they are taking the state out of the picture, but they say no. Regarding the permit system, don't know how it will be administrated and how we will fit into · it. Have to apply by April 15 and' use the long form which hasn't even been printed yet. States will be advised this next week on their allocations for this year and next year. Only problem is that it now gets into needs and priorities. In Ca lifornia $600 million of projects submitted to the State and only $200 million will be spent. Prob l em is to find out how these projects will be funded and which ones should be funded. #8 -Report of the General Counsel Nisson reported that he had been in contact with· LA City Attorney. City of LA is being sued on a permit charge, and Deputy City Attorney in charge of this called Ni ss on and wanted copies of Districts ordinances which were sent to them and in return City of LA sent us theirs. Have had good contact with LA County City Attorney and attorneys of CASA so can communicate easily but never worked with City of LA before. Thought Directors might be interested in some permit and sewerage facilities charges of City of LA and read various charges listed in ordinance. Herrin asked if these were being imposed at this time and Nissen answered yes, throughout City of LA. He also reported that he had attended a course put on by UCI on Ecological Impact Statements . Over 300 people. Principle thing is procedure aspect rathern than content of these reports. The impact statements must be prep ared and presented before the project is adopted and the proponents seeking the permit prepares the facts , and the agency which gives the permit is .suppose to prepare the stateme nt. This is the procedure and those that have not followed it are getting kicked back to start all over . Since that meeting, the legislature has enacted another amendment and it is a whole new ball gime again but don 't know what it is yet. Probably still will require the agency that iss ues the permit to be the one who has to prepare the report but person seeking it must supply th e facts from which to prepare the stat e me nt. .. Also reported on suits we are involved in: Peter Kiewitt suit -request for trial setting has been finalized. Will be taking deposition depending on when we get a trail date. Norman Tremblay suit -trial has been held and will be filing a reply brief sometime between January 2nd and 20th. Suit is between $5,000 and $8,000. Districts are very sympathetic but the law just doesn't permit us to pay this claim. p. 3 District 2 will be filing a condemnation action on 11 permanent parcels and 11 temporary. District 3 has right-of-way suit pending that Nissen thinks we will be able to settle. District 3 vs. Amercoat, Cook & Barletta -won appeal and is back down for trial in lower court. Will be grinding away during the next year. #15 -Award of P2-21 Nisson read his letter of recommendation regarding an extension of the award period. Kymla asked if the low bidder requested this extension of time and Finnell answered no, that we were concerned over Proposition 20 and requested a recommendation from the General Counsel. Quigley moved to receive and file the recommendation to have a supplemental agreement between the low bidder and second low bidder. Motion was seconded and carried. #16 -Joint statement re "critical air areas" FAH reported that SWRCB has been conducting hearings. Had one last Thursday (12/7) and will have another Jan. 4 to take additional testi- mony concerning this. What they are considering is changing the grant regulations for construction grants here in the state that would restrict the size of the facility to be constructed, through the existing need plus the projected five-year growth of the area, for any area that is determined by the Air Resources Board to .be known as a Hcritical air area". There is some confusion over "critical air areas" because two different maps were sent out. Came about as a means of adjusting the funding that was to take place in the state. Not really so much a concern of the air quality. Received letters from EPA and Air Resources Board. Statement made by George Taylor, Executive Officer of the State Resources Board, at meeting in LA ·was that there was no documentary evidence that this would improve conditions in any area. Question was asked if this was done by this Board, how much would the air quality be improved, and he just said it was part of their strategy. There are are a number of concerns. It would be a method of getting funding moved to another area of the state. Greatest population is here in Southern California where we do need the funding and should make sure our projects are put in. One restriction· t _hey are talk:i"ng about is that the five-year period would start from date of award of contract. Is kind of a back door approach trying to get local communities to change their zoning. We do not see a direct program coming to councils and planning commissions asking them to change .the zoning. They think if you don't put in the utilities, this will stop the growth. Not particularly true; example in District 7. Other po'int is in the event a community wished to expand the facilities or make them larger than the State would participate in, would go on a pro rata basis. Would actually penalize that community because they went ahead with larger facilities. p. 4 ·Had discussions with other entities and felt that the approach of a unified position paper and maybe offering an alternate method to accomplish something they felt needed to be accomplished might be a good method. EPA will pursue this even if State drops it. Griset moved the adoption of this motion authorizing Districts to enter into a joint statement with other sewering agencies. Finnell stated that he would like the Directors to consider one amendment to this motion. While he felt FAH wou ld look out for the Districts in any joint agreement, thought a joint statement should only be authorized after approval by at least the Executive Committee. This was made into a motion and seconded. Kymla asked if it would be the intent to call an Executive Committee meeting prior to Jan. 4 to approve this statement and Finnell answered that it would be mailed to them when it had been prepared in order for them to review it before Jan. 4th. Kymla commented re FAH 's report, that SWRCB had requested the respective agencies to submit recommendations for amendment to the proposed regulations. As part of this statement he i~ suggested that there also be suggestions for the amendme~ts. Some of the other agencies have already drafted some proposed amendments of which Kymla had copies with him. He stated that on the 19th the other agencies were getting together with FAH to work out this joint statement and recommendation. Finnell restated that he didn't think General Manager should be in a position to approve policies but that majority of Executive Committee should approve. There was a call for the question and motion was voted on and carried. #39 -Annexation No. 6 -Ana~eim Hills FAH reported that we still did not have the executed agreement back from one of the proponents. It was moved, seconded and carried to -table item un til agr eements ~ere received;. #41 -Change Order to #2-14-1 Finnell questioned whether we were getti~g the difference between the 72" and 78'' pipe for the same money and was answered yes, we were. Wond ered if this would cause any trouble and Mr . Harper said no, it would hlep us. (Winn mentioned he wanted to abstain from voting on this Item)?? #44 -Adjournment It was mentioned that the communications received were asking us to hold off until February for adjourned meeting. Mr. Harper suggested that the Board may wish to hold the hearing as scheduled on the 20th and declare its intent to continue the hearing to another date. If the Directors wish to do that, we can notify the different parties involve d. Castro called for the question . Just stated that he thought the hearing should be held off until Februrary. Smith stated that he received one written communication and had several calls from different ones of the Board that we should continue as scheduled. Said he felt we shou ld continue with the hearing. Nevil said La Habra didn't feel that there should be a delay of the hearing but that the hearing on the 20th should be continued to another day. Finnell stated that his council voted to have the public hearing as scheduled . Winn asked what the reason was for continuing and Finnell answered that the Orange County Chamber of Commerce had requ ested a continuance in order that they can prepare data to support their protests . Th e question was called for and the motion was voted on and carried. Culver abstained from voting on motion. p. 5 .Mr. Harper reported that the Special Committee to Review Compensation of Department Heads would be meeting sometime in January . #46 -Annexation No. 27 Miller asked what the problem was on this annexation. Mr . Harper reported that it was a 120 acre annexation which was proposed many months ago and we had received a letter asking that the annexation not be acted upon until action had been taken regarding annexation to the City of Orange. We have now received a letter to go ahead with annexation. At present time annexation is not served by a sewer system however the proponent of this ennexation had asked that the Assessment District No. ·9 sewer line be · oversized and he would pay for it. This was done in the construction of the A.D. facility. This facility ties into a line owned by the City of Orange which is not oversized to take in this particular area, assuming full development of the area would be served by the A.D. line. One of the things Mr. Harper mentioned that possibly the Board needs to consider is that if this area is now annexed to th e District without the construction of a proposed line that wou ld be out- side the District to get it over there to serve it, no doubt the proponent would ask to have the pumping station installed in the development and then pump over the hill into the Assessment District facilities. This is not part of the Master Plan. Question is if t he area to be annexed to the District, is the Board going to permit this type of a sewer situation? Will they accept a pumping station which would probably be in the 70th Sewer Maintenance Dis trict which has the tax rate of about $1.00 in addition to the 49¢ of District 7 -a pretty substantial cost to whoever buys what might be developed. When annexation first proposed to the District, was under the assumption that area was going to be annexed to Orange and line would be part of Master P lan of the District. Griset asked if the $1.00 rate would apply the other way and Mr. Harper answered no, if we went by gravity, would go b y whatever the City of Orange charged. Tax rate l ess than 5¢ if under 7t h SMD. Griset asked if the applicants wanted to come in that way and Mr . Harper said he didn't know. Miller questioned wh ether the Board would want to approve them getting sewer service that way if they were willing to pay. Mr. Harper stated that if the area were developed, we would have to add another facility at some time to take care of this. Facility of City of Orange not adequate to take care of area once it is f ully developed . Miller asked if the District on demand be req uired to spend more money for facilities. Griset also asked if Mr. Harper saw this a s a li ability to District 7. Mr. Harper answered by go ing ahead with the annexation , assuming that the line is not going to be built by a gravity system, it seems that the proponent would assume that he could pump over the hill. Clark said he thought we had some false fears. Lot of assumptions. Thought it would be appropriate to d e lay this. It was moved and seconded to defer this item. It was then mentioned that this item had already been moved and seconded . Smith then asked Engineer for more information on the size of the City of Orange line. Conrad Hohener reporte d that it was adequate for the drainage area, but when the drainage area becomes full because of development within assigned area, it would be infringing upon lines within tributary line. Quigley moved to strike all words in previous motion and insert new words to defer this item to January 3rd at 4:30. It was also suggested that we do no t increase annexation fees for this annexation as a result of this delay. Quigl ey agreed to include that in his motion . The motion was seconded and carried. The question was asked who would notify t he interested p art ies a nd the st~ff advised they would, p. 6 · #48 -Anne ·xati·on No. 28 Reported that the applicant had been notified that the fees will go up after this month and have been contacted by attorney for the estate but no definite action has been taken on paying the fees. Smith asked how long ago they were notified and was answered July 17th and again November 7th . . #53 -Contract 3-18 Culver indicated that a correction should be made to the minutes of the District 3 Special Meeting on December 7th. It was "Route B" rather than "Route A" recommended by the cons·ul t:ing engineers. McWhinney stated that the City had contacted Collins Eichman, the Navy and Edison Company. $28,000 to $30,000 if we go straight south. Will not charge for that particular easement. Navy also indicates they will work with us on parallel route but will need a couple weeks. No problem with Collins Eichman. Suggested that District 3 might consider coming down Goldenwest and cutting off on Main to Chestnut and then take diagonal across. Probably the cheapest of all the routes proposed. Conrad Hohener reported they had added Routes "F -North" and "F -South". Our differences in cost o.rer and above Route B, which is the original route, would be $30,000 per acre for right of way for routes which require right of way. Mr. Hohener said McWhinney's suggestion of Route E on Main Street and then westerly two blocks and down Chestnut and then diagonally across the Edison right of way would be the cheapest of any route. Said he was rather pessimistic about working with the Navy though. McWhinney said City was w0rking with Navy on Flood Control channel and possibly could be constructed at the same time and should be no problem. Nissen stated that if City council didn't approve Route E and won't approve a permit, then we have to take action to force them and we can win, as with case of City of Huntington Beach. Culver moved that we pursue the composite of Route E and F-South for a cost analysis. Herrin asked about the time problem and Culver said we were already behind so a couple more weeks wouldn't matter. Conrad Hohener stated that the staff andttieir recommendation .would be Route F -South and work principally with the Edison Company. Culver said that is what we recommend then -Composite of Route E and . F-South and will have a progress report for the next meeting. This was made into a motion, seconded and carried. THE END