HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972-12-13COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
December 8, 1972
TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11
Gentlemen:
TELEPHONES:
AREA C::ODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6', 7 and 11, of Orci..nge
County, California, will be held:
Wednesday evening, December 13, 1972
at 7:30 p.m.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Tentative adjournments prier to next regular meeting:
District No. 2
Executive Committee -
District No. 3
7:30 p.m., December 20 (Public Hearing)
5:00 p.m., January 3 (Immediately preceding
District No. 3 meeting and public hearing)
7:30 p.m., January 3 (Public Hearing)
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
Post Office Box 8 12 7
l 0844 Ell is Av enue
Foun tai n' Va lley, Ca lif ., 92708
Te lephones:
Area Code 71 4
540-2 910
9 62-2 4 11
De c em b e r 8, 1 972
REGULAR MEETING
Wedn esday, De cemb er 1 3, 1972
7 :30 p .m.
The fol l owing is a brief explanation of t h e more
impo rta nt non -r outine i t ems wh ich a ppear on t he enc l osed
age n d a a nd wh ich a r e n o t o t he rwi se self -e x p lanatory .
Wa r r ant lists are not a t tac h ed to the agenda sinc e they are
ma d e u p i mme diate l y p r eced i ng t he mee ting b u t wi l l appear in
t he compl e te age nd a a v ai labl e at the meeting .
Joint Boards
No . 6 -Repor t of t he Joint Chairman -The Joi nt Cha i rman
will repo r t on meet i ngs he and ~ a t tended in Washington , D.C.,
r e l ati ve to t he 1972 Federal Water Po llut i on Control Amend -
ment s . which a r e now being implemented by the Environmental
Protect i on Agency .
No . 1 2 -Repo r t of the Executive a n d Bu i lding Com.~ittees
a n d Acti ons on the Committees 1 Recommendations -The Comm ittees
me t on the evening of Decembe r 6th, with Director Kymla as a
g u es t . A wri tten repo r t on this meeti ng , together with the
r ecommendati ons to the Joint Boa r ds , is included with the agenda
materi al . The exec utive session noted on the agenda concerns
r ec ent 11 mee t -and -con fer 11 d i sc u ssi ons wi th representat i ves o f the
Ora n ge County Em ploy ees Associa t ion .
No . 1 3 -Con sent Ca l enda r -The fo l l ow i ng agenda i t ems fa l l
int o thi s cat ego r y i n accordance wi t h the definition established
b y t he Board s :
(a) Change Order for Interpl ant Influent Interce ptor ,
Job No . I -b -This Change Order represents an added
cost of $8,682 .17 . The contractor was required to
provi de additional bedding rock in areas where there
we r e l ayers of peat , which made ove r-excavation
n e c essar y . In addition, the contr actor encountered
a l a r ge conc r ete obstructi on whic h was not shown on
t he p l ans . Also , we required a sewe r connect i on to
serve the Districts ' new shops and warehouse . It is
r ecommended that t he Change Order be approved .
(b) Deny Cl aim for Damages -The Ci ty of Fountain
Va lley and a l ocal r e sident have filed with the
Di stricts forma l c laims f or damages allegedly caused
by the contractor constructing the Interplant Influent
I nterceptor on Br ookhurst south of Ellis Ave nue . It
i s t he General Counse l 's re comme ndation that the claims
b e deni ed and the matter be referred to the Districts '
contractor , Kordick a n d Rados, a j oint venture.
(c) Authorization for the Gene ral Manage r to Attend
WPCF Workshop in Detroit on De cember 12th -Du ring the
Joint Cha irman 's and General Manager's visit to the
Environmental Protection Agency headquarters in
Washington , D.C., it was suggested by several offic i als
t hat the Districts be r epresented at a one -day workshop
on 1 972 Amendment s to the Water Po llution Control Act,
t o be held in De troit on Decembe r 12th . The program
provides for an interchange between Washington EPA
staff personnel and management representing majo r
age ncies . The action appearing on t he agenda ratifies
.t he General Mana ge r's attendance at this workshop, as
r ecommen9ed by the Executive Comm i ttee .
(d) Award of Chlorine Contract -The cu rrent contract
to purchase chlorine will expire December 31st, there -
for e , new contract bids we r e received on December 6 th .
The specifications call. for a one -year contract , with
the Districts ' option to renew for an add i t i onal one
year period . Three bids we r e r e ceived, and the apparent
low bidder is Georgia Pacific Co rporation at $112 .70 per
ton .
(e) Purchase of Engine Analyzing Equi pme nt Unit , Six
4 -Wheel Electric Ca r s, One 1/2 -Ton Pickup Truck , Three
1 -Ton Fl at Bed Trucks , Four 1 -Ton Cao and Chass i s , and
One 16,000 lb . GVW T ruck with Articulated Hydraul ic
Cran e -The purchase of · t his equipment was i nc lud e d in
t h is yea r's budget, and eight of the equipment items
are replacement s . A bid tabulation is included with
the agenda material .
(f) Purchase of Mod ified Heads and Ma nifolds for
Waukesha Sl udge Gas Engin es -The staff is recomme nding
t h at t he negotiated exchange and purchase of parts for
the sludge gas engin es be approved (see enc l osed memo -
randum from the Districts ' Maintenance S up erint e nd ent).
-2 -
No . 1 5 -Report and Recommendation of the Gene ral Counse l
Pert ain i ng to the Award of Job No . P2 -21, Digesters N and O.
On November 21 , the Districts opened bids for the construction
o f t wo addi t i onal digeste r s at Treatment Plant No . 2 . These
structures will be built in the diges t e r comp l ex at the plant
a s a part of the 1971 -72 St ate and Fede r al Gr ant construction
p r o gram . State a n d Fede r al a ut ho ritie s have app roved 80%
fund ing of t he project. Th i s matte r, howeve r, h a s been referred
t o t he General Counsel since t hese fac ilities will be constructed
wit h i n 1 ,000 yards of the ocean, wh i ch means we may be subject
to the provis i ons of Proposition 20 , the r ecently-adopted Con -
stit u tional Amendment affecting development along Ca l ifornia 's
coastline . Mr . Ni sson will r eport at· the meeting .
No . 1 6 -Proposed Change in Cl ean Water Grant Program -The
Stat e Water Resources Control Board is considering a change in
t he ir Grant r egulations which would establish rest r ictions on
t he s i ze of facilities to be constructed to existing needs plus
five years qf growth in "critical air a r eas". If this r egulation
is .ad opted as proposed , most of Southern Ca l ifornia wi ll be
affe c ted and se r ious financial b urdens may be p l aced on our
taxpaye r s as a r es ult. I t has been suggested by seve r al managers
of o ther wate r and wastewater agen c i es i n Orange County , that a
unifi ed position paper be p r epared suggest i ng an alternative to
t he proposed regulation change which would be more equit~ble
and still accomplish the results desired by the State Boa r d .
Th e Districts ' Executive Committee has r eques t ed that the· staff
prepa re a repo r t for the Boar ds on this matte r t o be presented
at Wednesday 's mee ting .
Di s t r i ct No . ii
No . 25 -Approving Grant of Easement to Southern Califor nia
Edison Company re: Newland -Hamilton Pump Station Site -The
s t aff recommends that an easement be granted to the Southern
California Ed i son Company to install underground uti l ities
beh i nd the cur b line of the improved st r eet at the Di strict 's
Newla n d -Ham ilton Pump Stati on site . The grant of this easement ·
will insure that in the even t i mprovements or additions are
ma de at the pump station which conflict with the Edison Company 's
u tilities , they will be r elocated at no cost to the District .
Di st r icts Nos . 5 a n d 6
No . 3 0 -Ove r s izing Pac i f i c Co a st Highway Sewer Cr oss i ng
to Serve Hoag Hospital and Sur rolLnding Area ,-In June of this
yea r , the Boards of Distri cts Nos . 5 and 6 authori zed the
negot i at i on of an agreement fo r the oversizing of a Coast
Hi ghway Sewe r crossing in connect i on with replacement of a
-3-
portion of the Di stricts ' Trunk A in the Coast Highway . If
an agreement can be conswnmated, a distinct savings can be
realized by the Di stricts inasmuch as we would be paying only
for the oversizing of the sewer . The proposed construction
i s contemplated to be done by the contractor for the Districts '
Contract No . 5 -19, which is presently under construction . The
work involves the installation of 350 feet of 24-inch pipe ,
80 feet of which must be jacked under the Coast Highway . The
Change Order totals approximately $3 2,000 . The Districts '
share would amount to approximately $12,000 , with Dist rict
No . 5 paying 87% and District No . 6 13%. The entire matte r
is pending a decision of Hoag Hospital officials . Hopefully,
this will be resolved by Wednesday 's Board meeting .
District No . 6
No . 35 -November 8th Joint Meeting Agenda Items -At the
November 8th meeting of the Joint Boards , District No . 6
Directors were unable to act on Joint items because of the lack
of a quorum . It is recommended that the action appearing on
the agenda be approved which covers the Joint meeting items
that weie approved by the other Sanitation Districts on Novembe r
8th .
District No . 2
No . 39 -Status Report on Anaheim Hills Annexation -To
date, the proponents of this annexation have not returned
executed copies of the agreements autho r ized by the Board ;
there fore , this annexation has not been finalized . If the
annexation fees, or in this case the executed agreements, are
not submitted to the District by December 29th, the annexation
fees wi ll i ncrease . Attached to the agenda are copies of letters
to the proponents advising them of this situation .
No . 40 -Emp l oyment of Appraiser for Contract No . 2 -14 -
Included in the agenda material is a letter from the General
Counsel recommending the emp loyment of Everett S . Schmid as
appraiser for the District in the acquisition of rights of
way for the construction of Contract No . 2 -14 . Mr . Schmid 's
per diem rate is $15 .00 per hour .
No . 41 -Change Order to Contract No . 2 -14-1, Santa Ana .
River Interceptor, Sully-Mill e r Cont racting Company , Cont ractor .
This Change Order has been requ ested by the contrac tor to
increase the s i ze of the lined concrete pipe from 72 -inch to
78 -inch at no additional cost to the District . It is the
staf f 's recommendation that the Change Order be approved .
No . 44 -Adjournment -It is recommended that the Board
adjourn to 7:30 p .m., December 20th, which is the date selected
by the Board to conduct public hearings on the proposed Connect i on
Charge Ordinance (Ordinance No . 203).
-4-
... -.
Di strict No . 7
Nos . 45 , 46 and 47 -Annexations Nos . 26, 27, and 30 -The
fees have been r ecei ved on these pending annexations which have
been previously approved by the Board of Directors . It i s
r ecommended that resolution s be adopted to complete the annexa -
tion proceedings .
No •. 48 -Status Report on Proposed Annexati on No . 28 , Tract
No . 7389 -The proponents of th i s annexation have not submitted
the fees to complete this proposed annexation to the Di s trict .
Enclos ed for the Directors ' information is a copy of a letter
from the District to the p r oponent , advising that the annexation
fees will increase on January 1, 1 973 .
District No . 3
No . 52 -Addendum No. 1 t o Contract No . 3 -17 -1 Bolsa Relief
Trunk Sewer, Reach 1 , an Bolsa Avenue S orn Drain ·o r e Ci y
of Westminster) -This cont ract provides for the con s truction of
a 33 -inch sewer in Bolsa Avenue from NewlR-nd to Magnolia in the
Ci ty of W e stm~nste r. In addition , the contracto r will install ,
as a part of the contract , a storm drain for the City of
Westminste r . The contract will be admini stered by Distri ct
No . 3 o This adde ndum i s mere ly a clarification of ASTM spec i f i -
cations .
No . 54 -Further Consideration of Routing of Knott Inte r ceptor .
At a special meeting of the District Board on Decemb er 7 , the action
concerning the routing of the Knott Interceptor, Re ach 4, Contract
No . 3 -18 through the City of Westminste r was deferred to December
1 3 pending i nvestigation of a possible r oute adjacent to the
Southern Pac i f ic railroad tracks in the vicinity of Hoover and
Haza r d Avenues . The engineers have been di r ected to analyze and
prepare an es timate for this newly-suggested route f or the Board 's
conside ration.
No . 55 -Adjournment -It is recommended that the Board
adjourn to Janua r y 3rd which i s the time specified for a publ i c
h earing on the Di strict 's proposed Connection Charge Ordinance
(Ordina nc e No . 303).
FAH:j
F red A . Harper
Ge neral Manager
MEETING DATE Dec . 13 , 197 2 TIME 7:30 p .m. DI STRICTS 1 ,2 ,3 ,5 .6 ,7 & 11
DISTRICT 1
(HERRIN) •••••
(CASPERS) ••••
(wc:1 cu) , ....... "". '" ..... .
DISTRICT 2
lPEREZ) •• • •• •
~~NGER) •••••
l KO\'/ALS ['1 ) •••
GR I SET)····· HOLLIND~N) ••
ROBERTS) • • • • !CASPERS) ••••
REINHARDT) ••
DUTTON) •••••
(CASTRO) • • • • •
(DUNNE) ••••••
DISTRICT 3
ACTIVE DIRECTORS
GRISET· • • • • / ----
BATTIN ••••• ~ ___ _
MILLER •••••
PORTER • • • • • ~ == ==
SM I TH • • • • • • __JL__ ----CULVER • • • • • _!::::::::... __ __
F I N NELL • • • • _::::::::::__ __ __
FOX •••• •••• ~ ----
HERRIN .····· ~ ----
JUST ••••••• ~ ----
~ ----
....J.::::::::: ----
~ ----
~----
~---
~----
CULVER. • • • • V-___ _
(CASPE~S) •••• BATTIN ••••• ~ ----
!HINES) •. ) •••• DAVIS •••••• ~ ___ _
KOWAl,.S KI • • • FOX • • • • • • • • --io::::::::. __ _
COEN) ••••••• GREEN • • • • • • ~ ___ _
lGRISET) • • ••• HERRIN ••••• -~--__
FRANKi EWICH). LACAYO····.· .,,/ ----
NU I JENS)···· LEW.IS······ ~ ---
MILLER) • • • • • LONG······· ~ ----
MC WHINNEY. ~----·
REINHARDT) •• ROOT ••••••• _L --__
BLACKMAN) •••• SALES...... 7 ---
HOLLI NPEN). •• SCOTT •••• •· _____ _
DUTTON) •••••• STEPHENSON • _LL_ ___ _
ROBERTS) ••••• STEVENS •••• --5 _-_-BYRNE~ •••••• VANDERWAAL.
DISTRICT 5
JOINT BO AR DS ACTIVE DIRECTORS
LANGER •••••• FIN NELL.. • • • ~ .
CASPE RS) •••• BA KER....... ~ --. ,...11snr-n"' T'\"T......... ----
'""'"' rL.f\.:>1 •••• OM 1 11'l •••••• ~ __
CASPERS • • • • • o....-
(CASPERS) •••• CLARK • • • • • • • .,,/ --. ----CULVER • • • . • • ,-.-__
!HINES) ••••••• DAVIS ....... ~--
COEN) •••••••• DUKE ••• ••••• ~--
KOWAt,.S KI ). • • • FOX ••••••••• ~ __
(COEN) ........ GIBBS ....... ~ __
(COEN)~ ••••••• GREEN • • • • • • • ~ ---
(HERRIN) •••••• GR I SET • • • • • • V-----
(GRIS ET). • • • • • HERRIN • • • • • • ;::::::::-----
(HOLL I NDEN) ••• JUST •••••••• ~ __
(MC INNIS). • • • KYM LA • • • • • • • ~-
(FRANK I EW I cH). LACAYO······~ --
!NU I JENS).· •• • LEWIS • • · • • • • ~ --
MILLER) •••••• LONG •••••••• ~--
CROUL) ••••••• ttii lflfl IS •••• ----
MC WH I NNEY •• _.i.:::::::_ --
(WELSH) ••••••• MILLER •••••• ~ --
(ROBERTS) ••••• NEVIL.······~ --
(CASPERS) ••••• PH I LL I PS • • • • v-----
p 0 RTE R • • • • • • _i-::::::: --
(FIS C HB AC ti) ••• QUIGLEY ••.•• ~ --
(MC INN I SJ •••• ROGERS • • • • • • ~ __
(REINHARDT).·· ROOT········ ~ --
(BLACKMAN) • • • SALES • • • • • • • ~--
(HOLLI NDEN). • • SCOTT • • • • • • • _:::::::= --
(PEREZ) ••••.•• SM I TH • • .. • • • i-.----
(DUTTON) •••••• STEPHENSON •• _lk_ --
(ROBERTS) ••••• STEVENS · • · • • ~ --
(MC INNIS) •••• STORE •... ••• ~ --
(BYRNE) ••••••• VANDERWAAL •• ~ --
(CASTRO).·· • • • Hl!!D:U1 • • • • • • • ~-
(DUNNE) • • • • • • WINN • • • • • • • • --· --
-
* * * * *
) ~ (JOHNSON) CROUL •••••.• MO ?ififMI G ••• _!:__ ----BOYD········ ---
MITCHELL···· -·---· BAKER) ••••••• G/,IFE~ • • . . ~ ---
~'.~~,c:N:,~_; · · v--__ --OTHERS
DISTRICT 6
PORTER • • • • • v-------
(PH I LL I PS)··· GAMEftS • • • • i----'_,...., _-
(MC INNIS) •• • STORE······ i------
'DISTRICT 7
(WELSH) •••••• MILLER····· ~ ----
(CASPERS) • • • • CLARK • • • • • • ~
(HERRIN) • • .. • GR I SET ····· ~ -==
·/ PORTER •. · · · v ----
!FI SCHBACti ) ••• QUIGLEY •• V? / ----
MC INNIS) •••• ROGERS ••••• ~ ---
PJ::REZ) •••••• SMITH ...... ~----
DTSTR I CT 11
(COEN) ....... GIBBS ...... ---LL. ----
(cASP~RS) • • • • BAKER • • • • • • ._.......------
(COEN) • • • • • • • DUKE • • • • • • • ~----
DISTRICT 8·
(JOHNSQN ). • • · • BOYD • • • • • • •
(CLARK) ••••••• CASPERS • • • •
) MITCHELL .···
l?/1/7?
HARPER
~-K~-c\>t\ BROWN
SYLVESTER
~ LEWIS
DUNN
CLARKE
SIGLER
NISSON
TAYLOR
BROWN
BOETTNER
CARLSON
FINSTER
GALLOWAY
HOHENER
HOWARD
HUNT
KEITH
LYNCH
MADDOX
MARTINSON
MURO NEY
PIERSALL
STEVENS
.KENNEY
ME ET I NG DATE Dec, 13 , 1 9 7 2 TI ME 7 :3 0 p .m. DI STR ICT S 1,2 ,3,5,6 ,7 & 11
DI ST RIC T 1
(HERR IN) • · · · ·
(C AS PERS) ••••
(WEL S H) •••.••
DI STRICT 2
(PEREZ) • • • • • •
~ .NGER) .....
(KO WALSt<I) •••
(GR I S ET) •••••
(HOLLI NDf:N) .•
(RO BE RTS) • • • •
(C AS PERS) ••••
(R E I NHARDT) .•
(DUTTON) •••••
(CASTRO) •• · • •
(DUNNE) ••••••
DISTRICT 3
(CAS P ERS) ••••
iHINE S ) ......
KOY.!Al-S KI) •••
COEN) ••.••••
(GR I SET) ..•••
(FRAN K I EW I CH).
(NU I JE NS)····
(MILLER)·.···
ACTIVE DIRECTORS
GR I S ET · .. ·· --::? ----
BA TTI N ••••• ~-___ _
MILLER ..••• -r ___ _
PORTER • • • • • _____ _
SM I TH· • · · • •
CULVER ••• • •
FINNELL .•••
FO X •• · · • · · •
HERRIN·····
JUST •. • . • • •
NEV IL • • • • • •
PHILLIPS .••
ROOT ••••.••
STEPH ENSON.
WEDAI\ •••. • •
WINN .......
,/ -r----
-y-----
..... _/ ____ _
~----
o/ -./-----------/ -;r -----:r----r----
,/ CULVER ..... ______ _
BATTIN ••.•• _!__ ___ --
DAVIS •.•••• -7-___ _
FOX . . . . . . . . ______ _
GREEN ••...•. -7-___ _
HE RRIN·····-------
LACA YO • · • • • _./_ ----LE W I S ...... _./ ____ _
LONG • • • • • · • _./_ ----
MC WHINNEY • --5-----
(REI NHARDT) •. RO OT •••••.. __ ----
(BLA CKMAN ) .••• SALE S •••.•. _.; ____ _
(H OLLI ND EN ) ••• SCOTT ••••.• _./ ____ _
(DUT TO N) •..••• STEPHENSON. -7 _. __ _
(RO BE RTS) .•••. STEVE NS •.•• -T ____ _
(BY RN E) .•.•.•• VANDER WAAL . _____ _
DIST RICT 5
/ -r--
JOINT BOAR DS ACTIVE DIRECTORS
LAN GER ..•.••. FI NN ELL •• ; .• ~ _·_
CA S P ERS ) .... BAK ER....... ./
CASPER S ) •••• BATTIN •••••• ~;;---
CA S PERS ••••• ~ --
(C ASPERS) •••• CL ARK ••.•••• -y --. ---::;; --CULVER •.•.•• ____ _
iHINES) ••••••• DAVIS •••..•• ~ __
COEN) ........ DU KE ........ ____::__ __
KOWAL S KI) •••• FO X .•••.••.• _:::..._ __
(COEN) •••••••• GI BBS • • • • • • • v
(co_EN). ·~· ..... GREEN .. . • .. • ~ ==
(HERRI N •••.•• GR I S ET •• · ••.• ----
(GR I SET .••••• HE RR IN • •• • · · _v' __ _
(HOLLI NDE N) ••• JU ST ••• • •••• _/ __ _
(MC IN NIS).··· KY MLA • • • • • • • _:L_ --
(FRANKIEWICW· LAC AYO······ _v_ --·
~NU I JEN S ) .• • • • LE W I S • • • • • • • _L --~MILLE R) ...... LO NG ........ + __
~CROUL) ••••••• M' INNIS •••• ----
MC WH I NNEY •• _L_ --
(WELSH) ••••••. MILLER ....•• ___L_ --
(ROBERTS) ••••. NEV IL .•.••• • ___L_ --
(CASPERS) ••••• PHILLIPS··.·~ --
PORTER ..•••• __L __
(FISCHB ACti). • • QUIGLEY·····~ --
(MC INNIS).··· ROGERS······ ~ __
(RE I NHA RDT). • · ROOT • • • · • • • • ~ --
(BLACK MAN ) • • • SALES • • · • • · • _L --
(HOLL I ND EN). • • SCOTT • · • • • • • ./ --
(PERE Z) ....... SMIT H ........ '! --
(DUTTON ) .•..•• STEPHENSON •• --=::::__ --
(RO B ERTS) .•••• STE VE NS ...•• _iL_ --
(MC IN ~ I S ) .••• ST OR E ••••••• ---G---(B YRl~E, ••.•••• VA NDERW AAL •• ___ _
(CASTRO ).····· W.e-&A1\· • • • • • • _L --
(DU NNE)· .... • WIN N ........ _L ---
* * * * *
(JOHN SON) BOYD········ ----
MIT CHELL···· ----
( CR OU L ). • • • • . • t4C---Htttt"S . . •
(BAKER) .•.•••• C/\~PE!RS-; •••
KYMLA ••••••
DISTRICT 6
PORTER • • • • ·
(PHILLIP S ) • • • ~ · • •
(MC I NN IS).·· STORE······
-r--
---~tHHER~
/ ·J~ ~ -7--- -r4ku;f'
HAR P ER
~'i'lN
SYL VESTER
LE WIS
DU NN
CL ARK E
SIGLER
NI SSO N
TA YLOR
~----
DISTRICT 7
(}ff LSH) ...... MILLER ····· -+ ----
(C AS PER S ) • • • • CL ARK ······ ------
(HE RRIN ) · • · · · GR I S ET · • • • • __.:!_ ----
PO RTER •• 'frdi + -- -
(FI SC HBA Cti ) ••• QUIGLE Y . Jlq . -------
(MC JNNIS) •••• RO GERS ••••• ~ ----
(PE REZ ) ...... SM ITH ...... __'{_ __ --
D TR ICT 11
l COEN) ....... GI BBS ...... -~ ----
~C ASP ~R S) • · • • BAK ER · • • · • • -y-----.
l COEN) • • . • · · • DUKE · • · · • • · ------
DI STRIC T 8
CJOH NSQ N ) .•... BOY D ••.••.•
(CLARK ) .•.••.• CASPERS · · • •
MI TCHEL L • • ·
J.2 /1/7 2
~~
BO ETTNER
CA RLSON
FI NS TE R
GA LLOWAY
HOHENER
HOWARD
HU NT
KEI TH
LYNCH
MAD DOX
MARTINSON
MU RONEY
PI ERSA LL
STEVEN S
(J KEt rnEY
JliP-(J~~
-/
-.. 11·~
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 8127
IOE\Lt4 Ellis Av2nu~
Fountain Vailey, Calif., 92708
of Orange County, California
I
II
II
(1)
(2)
(3)
FILE ·······-··--(-4 )
LETIER ············-
A/C •.•• TKlR 4\J\ \ S
.. -·--··-·········-
-----·····----
(5)
f\\ \ s
t.LI. ·-······· .. ····
LETIER •••••••••••.••
A/C •••• TKLR •••• _
--···--@)
--·;:;ff··:::::: ...... .
LETIER ············@
A/C •••• TKLR •••• !)
F.L~:~
I. .R ··•··••··••···
~ •••• TKLR •••• (0 \
.,,' J ..._..._.. ______ _
(10)
JOINT BOARDS
Final AG E N D A
12/13/72
./
ADJOURNMENTS ...... ~ -
COMP & MILEAGE •• ~
December 13, 1972 -7:30 p.m.
FILES SET UP .................. -
RESOLUTIONS CERTIFIED.Y.'
LEHERS WRITTEN .......... .-
MINUTES WRITIEN ......... .-
Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation MINUTES flLED ............. _.
Roll Call
Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary v~&.. -100 S
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to receive and file minute
excerpt from City of Villa Park r·egarding appointment
of Robert R. Dunne as alternate Director on the
Board of District No. 2
EACH DISTRICT
Consideration of motions appr·oving minutes of the
following meetings, as mailed:
Distrtct l
District 2
District 3
District 5
District 6
District 7
Distrtct 11
ALL DIS'I'I~ICTS
Nove~ber 8, 1972 regular)
November 16, 1972 adjourned and
November 21, 1972 adjourned
November 8, 1972 regular
November 8, 1972 regular and
December 7, 1972 special (Copy t<f~~)
in Directors' meeting folders)
November 8, 1972 regul&.r
October 11, 1972 regular and
November 8 ) 1972 regular
November 8, 1972 regular
November 8, 1972 regular
Report of the Joint Chairman
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the General Manager
ALL DISTF.ICTS
Report of the General Counsel
ALL DISTRIC'I'S
Consideration of motion to convene in executive session
re personnel matters <2'-t5
ALL DISTRIC'l'S
Consideration of motion to reconvene in regular session q:s~
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Action on items considered in executive session:
FILE ···············-· (a) CO{isider~ion of actio~s re meet an~_confer
personnel 'Se_ssions · LETTER ••.•••••••••••
A/C ••.• TKLR •••• ( b )
.......................... fV\ \ s Consideration of Resolution No. 72-160, amending
Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 71-3, as
amended
·itE ············t12) ALL DISTRICTS
~TTER •...•• :_..... Report of the Executive and Building Committees and
A<~-~-~TKLR ····f'v\ \ s consideration of motion to receive and file the Committees'
···-··-········-······-written report dated December 8, 1972
---.............................. .
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
* * * * * * * * * * *
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are
considered as not requiring discussion or further
explanation and unless any particular item is
requested to be removed from the consent calendar
by a Director, staff member or member of the public
in attendance, there will be no separate discussion
of these items. All items on the consent calendar
will be enacted by one action approving all motions,
and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions
· included on the consent calendar. All items removed
from the consent calendar shall be considered
separately in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from
the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the
chair, state their name, address and designate by
letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted
from the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items
appearing on the consent calendar not specifically
removed from same.
f,Lf ········•····•••••
LETTER ···-·······( a )
A/C •... TKLR ••••
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6,
to the plans and specifications for Interplant Influent
Interceptor, Job No. I-·8, authorizing an addition of
$8,682.17 to the contract with Kordick & Rados, a Joint
Venture. See page "D"
---
----------·-·--
(b)
f,Lf .................•
(LEITER ····~--
~--_,,.,,,,.
A/C .... TKLR ••••
FILE .••••.••••••••••••
--/
~TT~R ••••••••••••••
A/C •••• TKLR ••••
Consideration of motion to receive, file, deny and
refer to contractor, the following claims for alleged
damages in connection with construction of Interplant
Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8, as recommended by
the General Counsel:
Claim submitted by Mr. & Mrs. Henry Gomez,
dated November 22, 1972, in the amount of
$3,057.36. See page ''E"
Claim submitted by City of Fountain Valley,
dated November 16, 1972, in the amount of
$2,010.14. See page 11 F"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 3)
-2-
,. .. .
(13) CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued)
(c) Consideration of motion ratifying attendance of
General Manager at the 1972 Federal Water Pollution
Control Act Amendments Worksho~ in Detroit,
PILE •.•••.•.....•••.••
LETTER •••.••.•...•••
A/C •... TKLR ••••
:::L£1.±::...
Michigan, on December 12th; and approving reimburse-
ment of transportation, lodging, meals and incidental
expenses incurred, as recommended by the Executive
Committee ------···--·--·
FILE ···-····_(SJ:_)
~ei· ~~~:~.':-~
Ate--.TKLR ••••
Consideration of Resolution No. 72-161, awarding
purchase contract for Supplying Chlorine in One Ton
Cylinders, Specification No. C-005, to Georgia-Pacific
Corporat~on in. the amount of $112.70 unit price per --ton. See page "G" --·-
(e) Consideration of motion to receive and fil~ bid
tabulations and recommendations, and awarding
purchase of the following:
FiLE:s. _____ ._... Specification No. E-066 for One ( 1) Engine
(J._~~ .... u:.: .. -~Analyzing Equipment Unit Designed Specifically we-.... TKLR •••• JrlP"'., for Engine Diagnosis, to Sun Electric Corpora ti on
~ . c .' s .....--;~ in the air..o un t of $ 4 , 3 2 6 . 0 0 . See page "H"
Specification No. A-063 for Six (6) 4-Wheel
~Electric Cars, to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing
)I'~· Company in the amount of $9,032.63. See page
II I"
Specification No. A-064 for One (1) 1/2-Ton
~ Plckup Truck, to International Harvester Company
-~ ' in the amount of $2, 940. 00. See page 11 J"
Specification No. A-065 for Three (3) 1-Ton ~?Flat Bed Trucks, to Santa Ana Dodge, Inc. in
the amount of $10,499.05. See page "K" -----
Specification No. A-066 for Four (4) 1-Ton Cab
· -~and Chassis, to International Harvester Company ~ in the amount of $12, 030. 00. See page "L"
Specification No. A-067 for One (1) 16,ooo lb.
~/GVW Truck With Articulated Hydraulic Crane, to
Santa Ana Dodge, Inc. in the amount of $10,599.75.
See page "M"
FILE ·············(T) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager
LETTER···-········· to issue purchase order to Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc.
we _TKLR --· ~if or acquisition of 24 improved replacement cylinder
. ~.o. ~ heads and manifold assemblies, for a net trade-in price
not to exceed $8,ooo.oo plus tax and freight. See
page "N"
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
:E~-~=5~ ALL DISTRICTS ~ Report and recommendation of General Counsel re affect of
Conservation Act)
"O" at Plant No. 2
~-~~~\\S
LETTER ·······""'"
recently passed Proposition 20 (Coastal Zone
on award of Job No. P2-21, Digesters "N" and
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion authorizing the Districts to enter
into a joint statement with other sewering agencies, opposing
the proposed amendment tQ Section 2144 of the Clean Water
Grant Program which would have the effect of limiting Sta·te
and Federal construction grant aid for wastewater projects
situaten. in 11 critical air arcc.s," to a capaclty le\~e1 tc ·::;et
existing needs plus five years of growth.
-3-
(17)
(18)
M\>
·( 19)
(20)
FILE ------
lETTER ·····--nj l S
A/C _ •• TKLR ••••
~21)
~22)
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file certification
of the General Manager that he has checked all bills
appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and
that he recom."!lends authorization for payment
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint
Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving warrant books for
signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing
payment of claims listed on page "A"
ALL:=:RI S TRI C'I'~
Other, business and co~nicat-1:.ons, if any
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of Resolution No. 72-162-1, to receive and file
bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for
Digesters "N" and "O" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-21, to
Hemisphere Constructors, Inc. in the amount of $1,068,413.00.
See pages "Q" and "P" ---rt /7 .Q; or-~~
DI8'±'RIC'r8 1 & 7
-Consideration of motion approving suspense ¥ttn<i--war~ants,
'if any • Bee pase "C"
DI8TRICT 1
Genaifiera:tien of metien approving tral'. t a11t~, if any .
Sec page "B"
( 23) nr-grRICT 1 .
· 0th~ ... busine~_ and comm~cations "~-any
(24) DISTRICT 1
(25)
FILE-···--·-
LETTER ···-··-···f'J\ \ s
A/C __ TKLR ••••
..,.~~~/
r-
(26)
['."\ \ <.>
N\\ c,.
~27)
(28)
(29)
M\~
Consideration of motion to adjourn 10'1 f1
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of Resolution No. 72-163-11~ authorizing
execution of Grant of Easement to Southern Californ~a Edison
Company to accornodate street improvements by the City of
Huntington Beach in Newland Avenue .
See page '1 Q"
DISTRICTS 3 & lJ_
Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants~
if any. See page 11 B"
DI8'J?RIGT 11
Oonaificration of motion approvlng warrants, i-f-a-n-y.
Sec page "C"
WSTRICT N
Obher busi'rtess and c~icatio~ if any \-0'. , .. '!
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn \~~\1
(30) DISTRICTS 5 & 6
Consideration of items re oversizing Pacific Coast Highway
{\J\ \ s Sewer crossing to serve Hoag Hospital and surrounding area
FILE -~"···--·· ·
LETTER ···--·-···( a )
A/C •••• TKLR -~
~t3 .. ~
r-
FILE ··············--' b)
LEITER ••••••••••••••
A/C _ .. TKLR •••.
Consideration of Resolution No. 72-166, authorizing
execution of agreement with Hoag Hospital for over-
sizing Pacific Coast Highway Sewer crossing in
connection with replacement of a portion of Newport
Beach ':L1runk A. See page "R';
Consideration of motion appr·ovinf.S Change Order No. _J_
to the plans and specifjcations for Sewer ·rrt~nk "B" --
rr :i.t 8 -Pacific Coast Hl-::1 .. way Force Main) Cont Fact
No. 5-19, to j_mplement agreement with Hoag Hospital
(Copy in Directors' meeting folders)
-4-
(32)
N\\ ~)
(33)
(34)
DISTRICTS 5 & 6
Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants,
if any. See page "B"
DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "B"
DY RICT 5 _
0th r busine~_and commun1~.~:_tions, ~any
DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn 10".\8
FILE ···-············· ( 35) DISTRICT 6
LETIER ·••••••••••••• Consideration of motion approving all i terns of joint business
A/~---·TKLR •••. N\\ s at the November 8, 1972 meeting, not acted upon by District
~ j\~~~: No. 6 because of lack of quorum. See page "S"
-----·---····
·( 36) DIS'3?RIOCfl 6
-Consideration of motion apfH?-e:v:.ing--~warrantsT·-4.f-an~.
See pa.go "G !!....
(37) D~T6
Other busines~d communica~s, if aby
(38) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of rr.otion to adjourn \ 0\ \<\
FILE --····-··-·-~
LETIER ··---{-f 39 ).i .DISTRIC'l1 2 A/C-~KLR~ Status report re Proposed Annexation No. 6 -Anaheim Hills
'v J..µcr~ it.Ii"' "' t • l'T 1 S " " ~~~ .... 1lnnexa ·ion .~o. . ee page T
'--···· (40)
F_ILE(---\.· =~,,/i\l' 'A)~\-~ ~9····---·······
A/C _TI<LR ••••
FILE ··········~····· ·~~\S
A/C •••. TKL -·
---·····-
r;.._----~--··
FILE~-~
( LETTER5···~·······
A7c-::TKLR •...
~ .. ~~ .. -:.:.
~~s
DISTRICT ·2
Consideration of motion authorizing employment of Everett S.
Schmid for right of way appraisal services in connection with
right of way acquisition for County Sanitation District No. 2
re Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No. 2-14, at a per
diem rasa of $15.00 per hour for a total amount not to exceed i~;~28~QG' as recommended by the General Counsel. See
page 11 U"
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2, to
the plans and specifications for the Santa Ana River Interceptor,
From Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract
No. 2-14-1, authorizing an increase in pipe size from 72 inches
to 78 inches to the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting
Compan;y, at no cost to the District. See page "V1'
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "B"
DISTRICT 2
Other business and co~munications, if any
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file communications
regarding hearings in connection with proposed connection
charges
c;::::-, DISTRICT 2 ~ Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., December 20,
1972 \0 · .. d.lc
__....... .... -...... ...
DIS 1rRIC'l1
'/
Consideration of Resolution No. 72-111-7, ordering an~exation
of territory to the District (Proposed Annexation No. 26 -
Santiar;'-Boulevard A~nexation to :aunty Sardtation Distri_ t
No. 7) Se2 page 11 W'' ---
-·5-
... '
~~} DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from
H. Lawson Mead> Attorney At Law, dated November 13, 1972,
FILE -·····~~~~;..'._ requesting final approval of Proposed .1-"..nnexation No. 2' on
~ behalf of the proponents of said annexation; and considera-
A/C r:; tion of Resolution No. 72-51-7> orC.ering annexation of
•••• TKLRJ r territory to the District (Proposed Annexation No. 27 -
-·-····-··-Mead Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). See
----· pages "X" and "Y" 'Ll'--\tvu...-R.. -b, 'T'~ 3 <l..k'/ · "0 ::;:::i..,J.
~ (-47J--DISTRICT 7 ~-r:b'v7-Consideration of Resolution No. 72-165-7, ordering annexation
.TKLR .•.. ~ \c of territory to the Dist~ict (Pro~ose~ Anr:exation No. 30 -~-~~1 1\ ::J Tract 6232 to County Sanitation District No. 7) See
page 11 Z"
FILE -( i.!±.8 ) __ -DISTRICT 7 ~ -Status report re Proposed Annexation No. 28 -Tract No. 7389 LETTER •••...•.....•• --
C (Estate of Marion E. Jones) to County Sanitation District A/C _TKLR .. Y
'-+Jt9)
fV\ \ s.
(50)
(51)
flU (52)
LETTER ···-··--~ -.. naa\:l. \ S, /~~~
r;__ _____ ..
(55)
FILE ·-····-·········
lETl'ER>~--1 Ate .... rKLR .Jv\ 1 s
~~-~-< ..... .
(56)
fif\\rs
No. 7. See page "AA"
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "C"
DI§TRICT 7 --~
Ot~ busines~~nd corrun~cations0-if any
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn ~ ,..~ ~a-'~ f: 3 o IO',<-/(_
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Balsa Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 10,
Contract No. 3-17-1,for County Sanitation District No. 3 and
Balsa Avenue Storm Drain for the City of Westminster. See
page "BB"
DISTRICT 3
Further consideration of routing of Knott Interceptor, Reach 4,
Contract No. 3-18, through the City of Westminster, deferred
from special meeting of December 7, 1972
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "B"
DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications, if any
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file comJnunications
regarding hearings.in connection with proposed connections
charges
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., January 3,
1973. \O ·. 53
-6-
II ;· BOARDS OF D~RECTORS
II
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
P. 0. Box 8J.27
10844 Ellis /\•1enu~
Fountain Vailey, Cr>lif., 92708
J0/1'/T BOARDS
December 13 2 1972 -7:30 o.m.
Final A G EN D A
12/13/72
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
( 2) Roll Call
(3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary ~
( 4) DIS'I1RICT 2
Consideration of motion to receive and file minute
excerpt from City of Villa Park regarding appointment
of Robert R. Dunne as alternate Director on the
Board of District No. 2
(5) · EACH DISTRICT
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
Consideration of motions approving minutes of the
following meetings, as mailed:
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 5
District 6
District 7
November 8, 1972 regular,
November 16, 1972 adjourned and
November 21, 1972 adjourned
November 8, 1972 regular
November 8, 1972 regular and
December 7, 1972 special (Copy
in Directors 1 meeting folders)
November 8, 1972 regular
October 11, 1972 regular and
NovembeP 8' 19'72 regular
November 8, 1972 regular
District 11 November 8, 1972 regular
ALL DIS'I1RIC 1TS (~ vJJ 1) ;
Report of the Joint Chairman , ~J flJ -· A Ah .. ,., ""'~
ALL DISTRICTS /J Jj (l)AA~v:J_'().J/l.j~6··· Ji ~
Report of the General Manager --r0 ~ / ) JIV""""-j ~ _J ~ ~ ~~ ~ .-,~· r-
ALL DIS'IRICTS · . ''~ --;~ ~!i---
Report of the General Courisel "1 , ~, ~~~~ "° 5f1~-~,
ALL DISTRICTS c:;;f~ ~ .,~ ef-P'r
Consideration o~ motio~ to convene i ex~&u 'ti: ses~ion
re personnel mai:;ters 8 ,11
ALL DIS~.'RICTS ~~
Consideration of motion to reconvene in regular se~>sion 9,,'r~
..
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Action on items considered in executive session:
(a) Consideration of actions re meet and confer
personnel sessions
f~ Consideration of Resolution No. 72-160, amending ~, Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 71-3, as
amended
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Executive and Building Corrunittees and
consideration of motion to receive and file the Committees'
written report dated December 8, 1972
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
* * * * * * * * * * *
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are
considered as not requiring discussion or further
explanation and unless any particular item is
requested to be removed from the consent calendar
by a Director, staff member or member of the public
in attendance, there will be no separate discussion
of these items. All items on the consent calendar
will be enacted by one action approving all motions,
and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions
included on the consent calendar. All items removed
from the consent calendar shall be considered
separately in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from
the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the
chair, state their name, address and designate by
letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted
from the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items
appearing on the consent calendar not specifically
removed from same.
(a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6,
to the plans and specifications for Interplant Influent
Interceptor, Job No. I-8, authorizing an addition of
$8,682.17 to the contract with Kordick & Rados, a Joint
Venture. See page "D"
(b) Consideration of motion to receive, file, deny and
refer to contractor, the following claims for alleged
damages in connection with construction of Interplant
Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8, as recommended by
the General Counsel:
Claim submitted by Mr. & Mrs. Henry Gomez,
dated November 22, 1972, in the amount of
$3,057.36. See page "E"
Claim submitted by City of Fountain Valley,
dated November 16, 1972, in the amount of
$2J010.14. See page "F"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 3)
-2-·
(13) CONSENT CALENDAR (Co n tinued )
(c )
(d )
(e )
(f)
rq?'..4 g
Consideration of motion ratifying attenda nce of
Gen e ral Manager at the 1972 Fed e ral Water Pollution
Control Act Amendments Workshop, in Detroit ,
Michigan , on Decem ber 12th ; and approving reimburse -
ment of transportation, lodging , meals and incidental
expenses incurred , as recommended by the Execut i ve
Comini ttee
Consideration of Resol u t i on No. 72 -16 1 , awardi ng
purchase contract for Supplying Ch l orine in One Ton
Cylinde r s, Spec i fication No . C-005 , to Georgia-Paci f i c
Corporat~on in the amount of $112 .70 u nit price pe r
ton . See page 11 G"
Co n sideration of motion to receive and file bid
tabulations and rec ommend ation s , and awarding
purchase of the following :/
Spec i fication No. E-066 for One (1 ) Engine
Analyzing Equipment Unit Designed Specifically
f or Engine Diagnosis , to Sun Electric Corporation
in t h e amount of $ 4 , 326 . 00. See page 11 H11
Spec i fication No . A-063 for Six (6 ) 4-Wheel
Ele c tric Cars, to Taylor-Dunn Ma nufacturing
Company in the amount of $9,032.63. See page
11 I 11
Spec i ficati on No. A-06 {for One (1 ) 1/2-Ton
Pickup Truck , to International Harvester Company
in the amo unt of $2,940.00 . See page nJ 11
Sp e cification No . A-06 ~or Three (3) 1-Ton
Flat Bed Trucks , to Santa Ana Dodge , Inc . in
the amount of $10, 499 . 05 . See page 11K11
Specif1cation No . A-067ror Four ( 4) 1-Ton Cab
and Chassis, to In ternational Harve ster Company
i n the amount of $12, 030. 00 . See page 11 Ln
Specification No . A-067vf'."or' One (1) 16 ,00 0 lb.
GVW Truck With Articulated Hydraulic Crane, to
Santa A'.na Dodge, Inc. in the amount of $10, 599. 75 .
See page n wr
Consideration of motion a uthori zing the Gene r al Manager
t o i ssue purchase ord e r to Wauk es ha Engine Servicenter, Inc .
for acquisition of 24 impro v e d r e plac e ment cylinder
heads and manifold ass e mblies , fo r a net trade-in price
not to exceed $8 ,ooo.oo plus tax and frei gh t . See
page t 1 N 11
(14 ) ALL DISTRICTS
(1 5)
1)1rxV
(1 6 )
Cons idera.tion of items deleted from consent calendar , if any
ALL DI STRICTS
Re port a nd r e corrri1e ndati o n of General Co uns el r e affec t of
r e cent ly pass e d Prop os it i on 2 0 (Co as t al Zone Conse rva tio n Act)
on aw ard of Job No . P2 -21 , Digesters 11 N 11 and 11 0 11 a t Pl a nt No. 2
ALL DI STR I CTS
Con s i de r at i o n o f mo t1 o n a u t h ori z ing t h e Di s trict s t o en ter
into a j o i nt s tat ement wi th o th e r sewe ri ng agen cies, o pposing
the prop o se d amendme n t t o Section 21 44 of the Cl ean Water
Gr ant Pr ogram wh ic h wo u ld have the effect of l i miti n g State
a n d Fed e ra l con stru ct i on gran t ai d for wast e water pro j ec t s
s i t u ate ,~ i n 11 cri t ical a i r a.reas , 11 t o a cap acit y leve l to -.'e c t
ex is ti ng n ee d s plu s fiv e y ear s o f gro wth.
-3-
(17) ALL DISTR ICTS
Con s ideration of motion to r e ceiv e a nd fi le certi fi c at ion
of the Gener a l Ma nager that h e h as check ed a ll bills
appearing on the agenda, found th em to b e in order , and
that he r ecomme nds authorization for paym e nt
(18 ) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of rol l cal l vote motion approving Joint
Operati n g and Capital Outlay Revolving warrant books fo r
s i gnature of the Chairman of District No . 1, and autho ri z ing
payment o f claims li sted o n page "A11
(1 9) ALL DISTRICTS
Ot h er business an d c ommunications , if a ny
l~Qonside r ation of Resolution No . 72 -162-1 , to receive and fil e
(~O) DI STRICT 1 ·
~J/bi d tabu l ation and r e comm endation, and awarding contract f or
Digesters 11 N 11 a nd 11 0 11 at Plant No . 2, J ob No . P2 -21 , to
,}~/H emisphere Con structors , Inc . in the amount of $1 ,068 ,413.00 .
iY I\\[/ See pages 11 011 and 11 P "
D, \'J (21 J DI 8TRIGT8 1 & 1
Consideration of mot ion approv i ng suspense fund warrantg ,
if any . See ps.gc 11 8 11
E 2 2 ) DISCJ?R±cm l
Consideration of mo t ion app roving wa rr ant s, i f a n y .
S ee page "B''
(2 3) DISTRICT 1
Other business and com mu nications, if any
(24) DISTRI CT 1
~25)
(2 6 )
{27)
Con side ration of motion to ·adjourn
DISTRICT 1 1
Consideration of Resolution No . 72 -163-11, authorizing
execution of Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison
Company to accomodate stree t improveme nts by the City of
Hunt i ngton Beach i n Newland Av e nue .
Se e page nQ"
DISTRICTS 3 & 1 1
Consi de ration of motion approving suspens e fund warrant s,
i f any . See page "B11
DISTR I CT 11
Gonsidcr~tion of Motion app r ovi ng warrants , i f any.
-&cc pe:gc !I G 11
(28 ) DISTRICT 11
Other business and communi c a t ions, if a n y
(29 ) DISTRICT 11
Conside ration of motion to adjourn
(3 0 ) DISTRI CT S 5 & 6
Consi de ration of i tems re ove r s izing Pacific Coast Highwa y
Sewer crossing to serve Hoag Hospital and surroun d in g area
(a ) Consideration of Resolution No . 72 -1 66 , authorizing
exe c u tion of agreement with Hoag Hospital for over -
sizing Paci fic Coast Hi ghway Sewer crossing in
conn ection with replacement of a por ~io n o f Newpo rt
Beac h Trunk A. See page 11 R'1
(b) Consideration o f motion app roving Change Order No.
to the plans and specific2.t:lons for Sewer Trunk ''B" ·-
U ~ it 8 -Pacific Coast Hi[t way Force Main, Con~rac~
No. 5 -19, to impl eme nt agreement with Hoag Hospi t a l
(Copy in Directors 1 meeting folders)
-~--
(3 1 ) DISTRICTS 5 & 6
Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrant s ,
if any . See page "B"
(32) DISTRICT 5
Considerat i on of mo t ion approv i ng war rants , if any .
See page "B 11
(33) DISTRI CT 5
Other bu s ine ss and commun i cat i ons , i f a n y
(34) DISTRICT 5
Co n s id e r a t i on of mot i o n to adjourn
(3 5 ) DISTRI CT 6
Cons i derat i on of motion approving a l l i t ems of joint bus iness
at the November 8, 1972 meeting, not acted u pon by Dist rict
No . 6 b e c ause of lack of quorum . See page "S 11
(36) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion approving ;;arrants , if anj'-7
Sec page n o n
(3 7) DISTRICT 6
Other b u siness and communication s , i f a n y
(38 ) DI STRICT 6
(39 )
<;jd!~
(40 )
(41)
(42)
Considerat i o n o f mo tion to ad j our n
DISTRICT 2
Status report r e Proposed Annexat i on No . 6 -Anaheim Hil l s
Annexation No . 1. See page "T "
DISTRICT ·2
Consideration of motion authorizing e mployment of Everett S .
Schmid for right of way appraisa l s e rvices in conn e ction with
r ight of way acquisition for County Sanitation District No . 2
re Santa Ana River Interceptor , Contra ct No . 2-14 , at a per
giem rase o f $15.00 per hour for a total amount not to exceed
$~;~88~Gg' as recommended by the Genera l Counsel . See
page nu rr
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of mot i on approving Chan g e Order No . 2 , to
t he plans and specifications fo r the Santa Ana River Intercep t or 1
F r om Reclamat i o n Plant No . 1 to Katella Avenue , Contract
No . 2 -1 4 -1, authorizing an increase in pipe size from 72 inches
to 78 inches to the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting
Company , at no cost :~f _the D~9tr,ict. See page "V"
w l,W"' -ul-t'ew-.
DISTRICT 2
Considerat i on of mot i on approving warrants , if any .
See page 11 B 11
(43 ) DISTRICT 2
Other business and commun i cations , if any
(a ) Consideration of motion to rec e ive and fil e communications
re g arding h earing s in connection wit h propos ed conn e c t i o n
char ge s
'"~D IS T RI CT 2 ~J ·Considera tion o f motion to a djourn t o 7:30 p .rn ., De c em b e r 20 ,
197 2
(4 5 ) DIST RI CT f
Co nsidera ti o n of Reso lut i on No . 7 2 -111-7, o r deri n G an n exatio n
of terr i to r y to the District (Pr o posed Annexation No . 26 -
S a n tiago Bou levard Annexat io n to ~aunty San itat ion Distri~~
No . 7) See page --~-11
__
·-5 --
• • •
(46) DISTRIC T 7
(47)
(48)
(49)
(5 0)
(5 1)
(52 )
(53)
(54 )
(55)
Consideration of motion to receive and file le tter fr o m
H. Law s on Mead, Attorney At Law , dated Nove mb er 13, 1972 ,
requesting final approval of Propo se d Annexation No . 2? on
behalf o f the propone nts of said annexation; a nd considera-
tion of Resolu t i on No. 72-51 -7 , ordering a nn e xation of
te r ritory to the District (Proposed Annexati o n No . 27 -~
Mead Annexation to County Sanitation D:is~r?_:;J No . 7) .. See J" p ages}/\))~·~~': fl ~te"Y ~c:: ~W"' ~'~
1
~
DISTRICT 7 ~ {})/ ~"-~ \!?
Cons i deration of Resolution No . 72 -65 -7, brdering annexation f
of territor y to the District (Proposed Annexation No . 30 -4t
Tr ac t 6232 t o County Sanitat i on District No . '7) See ~
p age "Z" -~ \
;.c? t. DISTRICT 7
Status report re Proposed Annexation No . 28 -Tract No . 7389
(Estate of Marion E . Jones) to County Sanitation Distr i ct
No . 7 . See page "AA"
'~--
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion approving warrants , if any .
See page 11 C11
DISTRICT 7
Othe r bus ine ss and communications , if any
DISTRICT 7 ~ -,/l) d,'}v
Conside ration of mot i on to adjourn ()' > 7
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion approving Addendum No . 1 to the
~ t;
t
p l ans and specifications f o r Bolsa Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 10 ,
Contract No . 3-17 -1,for County Sanita tion Di strict No . 3 and
Bolsa Avenue Storm Dra~n f~r the Ci t y of Westminster. See
page ,.BB ', ~
DISTRICT 3
Further consideration of routing of Knott Interceptor , Re ach 4,
Contract No . 3-18, throug h the City of Westminster , Ldefer,;r e )l ((2.,
from specialT,meeting o1f t~~~e~ ~~~ ~ .-L (~ y
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion approv i ng warrants , if any . ·
See page 11 B "
DISTRICT 3
Other business and communic a tions , if any
(a ) Consideration of motion to receive and file communications
re g arding hearings i n connectio n with p r o p os e d conne ctions
ch a rges
( 56 ) DIS'rRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7 :30 p .m., January 3 ,
1 973.
-6-
~.
Ii
II
II Ii
Ii
i
I
,I
II
II
BO AR D S O F DIRE CTORS
County Sa ni tati o n Di stricts P. 0. Box 8127
10844 ~l lis Avenue
Founta in Valley, CaliF., 92708
of Orange Cou nt y, California
JOINT BOARDS
Preliminary A G E N D A
12/8/72
December 13, 1972 -7:30 p .m.
(1) P l edge of Allegi ance and Invocation
(2) Roll Call
(3) Appointment of Chairmen .pro tern, if necessary
(4) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to receive and file minute
excerpt from City of Vi l la Park regarding appointment
of Robert R . Dunne as alternate Director on the
Board of District No. 2
(5) EACH DISTRICT
~
Consideration of motions approving minutes of the
following meetings , as mai l ed:
District 1
District 2
Distri ct 3
District 5
Di strict 6
District 7
District 11
November 8 , 1972 regular,
November 16, 1972 adjourned and
November 2 1 , 1972 adjourned
November 8 , 1972 regular
November 8, 1972 regular and
December 7, 1972 special (Copy
i n Directors ' meeting fold e rs)
•
November 8, 1972 regular
October 1 1 , 1972 regular and
November 8 , 1972 regular
November 8 , 1972 regular
November 8 , 1972 regular
(6) ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Joint Chairman
(7) AL L DISTRICTS
Report of the General Manager
(8) ALL DIS TR ICTS
Report of t h e General Counsel
(9) ALL DI ST RIC TS
Considera tio n o f moti on to convene i n e xecutive ses sio n
re p e r s onne l ma tt e rs
(10) ALL DI STR I CT S
Conside r ation of mo tion to r e conve n e in r egul ar sess i on
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Action on items considered in executive session:
(a) Consideration of actions re meet and confer
personnel sessions
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 72-160, amending
Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 71-3, as
amended (Copy in Directors' meeting folders)
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Executive and Building Committees and
consideration of motion to receive and file the Committees'
written report dated December 8, 1972
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
* * * * * * * * * * *
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are
considered as not requiring discussion or further
explanation and unless any particular item is
requested to be removed from the consent calendar
by a Director, staff member or member of the public
in attendance, there will be no separate discussion
of these items. All items on the consent calendar
will be enacted by one action approving all motions,
and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions
included on the consent calendar. All items removed
from the consent calendar shall be considered
separately in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from
the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the
chair, state their name, address and designate by
letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted
from the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to appr9ve all agenda items
_appearing on the consent calendar not specifically
removed from same.
(a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6,
to the plans and specifications for Interplant Influent
Interceptor, Job No. I-8, authorizing an addition of
$8,682.17 to the contract with Kordick & Rados, a Joint
Venture. See page "D"
(b) Consideration of motion to receive, file, deny and
refer to contractor, the following claims for alleged
damages in connection with construction of Interplant
Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8, as recommended by
the General Counsel:
Claim submitted by Mr. & Mrs. Henry Gomez,
dated November 22, 1972, in the amount of
$3,057.36. See page "E"
Claim submitted by City of Fountain Valley,
dated November 16, 1972, in the amount of
$2, 010 .14. See page "F"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 3)
-2-
(13) CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued)
'
(c) Consideration of motion ratifying attendance of
General Manager at the 1972 Federal Water Pollution
Control Act Amendments Workshop~in Detroit,
Michigan, on December 12th; and approving reimburse-
ment of transportation, lodging, meals and incidental
expenses incurred, as recommended by the Executive
Committee
(d) Consideration of Resolution No. 72-161, awarding
purchase contract for Supplying Chlorine in One Ton
Cylinders, Specification No. C-005, to Georgia-?acific
Corporation in the amount of $112.70 unit price per
ton. See page "G"
(e) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid
tabulations and recommendations, and awarding
purchase of the following:
Specification No. E-066 for One (1) Engine
Analyzing Equipment Unit Designed Specifically
for Engine Diagnosis, to Sun Electric Corporation
in the amount of $4,326.00. See page "H"
Specification No. A-063 for Six (6) 4-Wheel
Electric Cars, to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing
Company in the amount of $9,032.63. See page
"I"
Specification No. A-064 for One (1) 1/2-Ton
Pickup Truck, to International Harvester Company
in the amount of $2,940.00. See page "J"
Specification No. A-065 for Three (3) 1-Ton
·Flat Bed Trucks, to Santa Ana Dodge, Inc. in
the amount of $10,499.05. See page "K" -----
Specification No. A-066 for Four (4) 1-Ton Cab
and Chassis, to International Harvester Company
in the amount of $12,030.00. See page "L"
Specification No. A-067 for One (1) 16,000 lb.
\.
GVW Truck With Articulated Hydraulic Crane, to
Santa Ana Dodge, Inc. in the amount of $10,599.75.
See page "M"
(f) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager
to issue purchase order to Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc.
for acquisition of 24 improved replacement cylinder
heads and manifold assemblies, for a net trade-in price
not to exceed $8,000.00 plus tax and freight. See
page "N"
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
(15) ALL DISTRICTS
Report and recommendation of General Counsel re affect of
recently passed Proposition 20 (Coastal Zone Conservation Act)
on award of Job No. P2-21, Digesters "N" and "O" at Plant No. 2
(16) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion authorizing the Districts to enter
into a joint statement with other sewering agencies, opposing
the proposed amendment to Section 2144 of the Clean Water
Grant Program which would have the effect of limiting State
and Federal construction grant aid for wastewater projects
situated in "critical air areas," to a capacity level to meet
~xisting needs plus five years of growth.
-3-
(17) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file certification
of the General Manager that he has checked all bills
appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and
that he recommends authorization for payment
(18) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint
Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving warrant books for
signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing
payment of claims listed on page "A"
(19) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications, if any
(20) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of Resolution No. 72-162-1, to receive and file
bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for
Digesters "N" and "O" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-21, to
Hemisphere Constructors, Inc. in the amount of $1,068,413.00.
See pages "O" and "P"
(21) DISTRICTS 1 & 7
Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants,
if any. See page "C"
(22) . DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "B"
(23) DISTRICT 1
(24)
~25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
Other business and communications, if any
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of Resolution No. 72-163-11, authorizing
execution of Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison
Company to accomodate street improvements by the City of
Huntington Beach in Newland Avenue.
See page "Q"
DISTRICTS 3 & 11
Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants,
·if any. See page "B"
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "C"
DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications, if any
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn
DISTRICTS 5 & 6
Consideration of items re oversizing Pacific Coast Highway
Sewer crossing to serve Hoag Hospital and surrounding area
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 72-166, authorizing
execution of agreement with Hoag Hospital for over-
sizing Pacific Coast Highway S·ewer crossing in
connection with replacement of a portion of Newport
Beach Trunk A. See page "R"
(b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No.
to the plans and specifications for Sewer Trunk "B" -
Unit 8 -Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Contract
No. 5-19, to implement agreement with Hoag Hospital
(Copy in Directors' meeting folders)
-4-
(31) DISTRICTS 5 & 6
Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants,
if any. See page "B"
(32) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of n1otion ap:µroving warrants, if any.
See page "B"
(33) DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications, if any
(34) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(35) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion approving all items of joint business
at the November 8, 1972 meeting, not acted upon by District
No. 6 because of lack of quorum. See page "S"
(36) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "C"
(37) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications, if any
(38) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(39) DISTRICT 2
Status report re Proposed Annexation No. 6 -Anaheim Hills
Am;exation No. 1. See page "T"
(40) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion authorizing employment of Everett S.
Schmid for right of way appraisal services in connection with
right of way acquisition for County Sanitation District No. 2
re Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No. 2-14, at a per
diem rate of $15.00 per hour for a total amount not to exceed
$1,500.00, as reconunended by the General Counsel. See
page "U"
(41) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2, to
the plans and specifications for the Santa Ana River Interceptor,
'From Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract
No. 2-14-1, authorizing an increase in pipe size from 72 inches
to 78 inches to the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting
Company, at no cost to the District. See page "V"
( 42) -DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "B"
(43) DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications, if any
(44) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., December 20,
1972
(45) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No. 72-111~7, ordering annexation
of territory to the District (Proposed Annexation No. 26 -
Santiago Boulevard Annexation to County Sanitation District
No. 7) See page "W"
-5-
...
(46) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from
H. Lawson Mead, Attorney At Law, dated November 13, 1972,
requc~ting final approval of Proposed Annexation No. 2G or1
behalf of the proponents of said annexation; and considera-
tion of Resolution No. 72-51-7, ordering annexation of
territory to the District (Proposed Annexation No. 27 -
Mead Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). See
pages "X" and "Y"
(47) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No. 72-165-7, ordering annexation
of territory to the District (Proposed Annexation No. 30 -
Tract 6232 to County Sanitation District No. 7) See
page "Z"
(48) DISTRICT 7
Status report re Proposed Annexation No. 28 -Tract No. 7389
(Estate of Marion E. Jones) to County Sanitation District
No. 7. See page "AA"
(49) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "C"
(50) DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications, if any
(51) DISTRICT 7
(52)
Co~sideration of motion to adjourn
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Bolsa Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 10,
Contract No. 3-17-1,for County Sanitation District No. 3 and
Bolsa Avenue Storm Drain for the City of Westminster. See
page "BB"
(53) DISTRICT 3
Further consideration of routing of Knott Interceptor, Reach 4,
Contract No. 3-18, through the City of Westminster, deferred
from special meeting of December 7, 1972
(54) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "B"
(55) DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications, if any
(56) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., January 3,
1973.
-6-
CLARK MILLER
~ C, ARTHUR NISSON
NE:LSON KOGLER
H. LAWSON MEAD
MILLER. NISSON S KOGLER
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
2014 NORTH BROADWAY
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706
December 13, 1972
Directors of County Sanitation
Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11
of Orange County
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Gentlemen:
Re: Report on Agenda Item 15
Regular meeting of
December 13, 1972
!\ien~a Item No •• /~ .• ,.
TE:LEPHONE
AREA CODE 714
542-6771
The enactment of Proposition 20 as a Constitutional
Amendment will require a permit from the South Coast Regional
Water Commission after February 1, 1973 for Project P2-21. The
effect of this statute on projects under way before that time
is uncertain; however, P2-21 was not under construction prior
to November 7, 1972. In that no permit to build was required
prior to the passage of Proposition 20, there are no guidelines
regarding the effect of the start of construction on a project
prior to February 1, 1973. It does seem certain that an appli-
cation for a permit should be made as soon as possible.
It is my recommendation that the Directors authorize
a Supplemental Agreement to be approved by the low bidder as
a condition to letting the contract for P2-21. The Supplemental
Agreement should recognize the possibility of delay, or a work
stoppage, by reason of Proposition 20 and provide that the
Districts should not be penalized in such an eventuality. It
should also protect the contractor from price changes, if any
should occur during work stoppages occasioned by the effect
of Proposition 20.
In line with this recommendation, I suggest a delay
in the awarding of the contract for P2-21 until such time as
a Supplemental Agreement can be worked out and approved by the
State and Federal grant agencies and the apparent low bidder.
I suggest the Supplemental Agreement be presented to the low
bidder and second low bidder and the contract be awarded to
the second low bidder if the low bidder will not accept the
Supplemental Agreement and the second low bidder will accept
the Supplemental Agreement.
Directors of County Sanitation
Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 -2-December 13, 1972
It is believed that an extension of the 90 day award
period required by the State and Federal grant agencies can be
complied with or extended so that the grant for this project
will not be lost.
I have every reason to believe the Districts will be
granted a permit for P2-21 from the South Coast Regional Comis-
sion in the due course of events. An Environmental Impact State-
ment was prepared and submitted to public hearing. It has been
submitted to the cities of Huntington Beach and Newport Beach
and no criticism has been made. The State Water Resources
Control Board and the Federal agency charged with enforcing
the National Environmental Policy Act have approved the project
as in compliance with their criteria. Project P2-21 will not
alter any bay, estuary, salt marsh, river mouth, slough or lagoon;
it will not reduce the size or other area useable for public
recreation; it will not reduce or impose restrictions upon
public access to tide or submerged lands or beaches; it will
not interfere·with the line of sight toward the sea from the
state highway nearest to the coast and, lastly, it will not
adversely affect water quality. It is in fact needed to provide
treatment for increased effluent to prevent the adverse affect of
such ~ncreased sewage on water quality.
CAN:ac
Very truly yours,
(/c~ ~-~-· I r u~~;(c~I. /µ~dJ-,
C. Arthur Nisson
General Counsel
DISTRICT 2 -Agenda Item No. 43(a)
Consideration of motion to receive and file communications
regarding hearings in connection with proposed connection
charges
DISTRICT 3 -Agenda Item No. 55(a)
Consideration of motion to receive and file communications
regarding hearings in connection with proposed connection
charges
GARDEN GROVE
~fiamfier-aC ~arnmettee
December 6, 1972
Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitary Districts No. 2 & 3
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Re: Public Hearings for December 20, 1972 and
January 3, 1973
Dear Sirs:
Agenda Item Nos &./ J(~) ~ S S(a
We appreciate receiving the November 14 notices concerning the
notice of intent to adopt Ordnances No. 203 and 303.
The December 20 date relative to the hearing of Ordaance No. 203
and the January 3rd date relevant to proposed Ordnance No. 303
occur at a time that is difficult for representatives of our
Chamber of Commerce to attend the hearings. Therefore, we would
concur with the request of postponement of the two probable hear-
ings, as suggested by the Garden Grove Sanitary District to a
date later than the 15th of January.
At this time it is the present intent of our Chamber of Commerce
to register protest testimony ordinances. Therefore, a change of
date will be of great assistance.
JE/jtb
Sincerely,
/ . ·,'( f, . i __ . /t., ll-t-t.... ...
~/
. I 11
/\/(Lt-C
John Harl, Vice President
Economic Development Council
Chamber of Commerce
Agenda Item No. '13t~...SSd>J
CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA
11391 ACACIA PARKWAY, GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA 92640
Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary
Board of Directors
December 8, 1972
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Post Office Box 812 7
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Dear Mr. Sylvester:
In behalf of the Garden Grove City Council, this is to request that public
hearings scheduled by Orange County Sanitary District No. 2 for Decem-
ber 20, 1972, and by Orange County Sanitary District No.3 for January 3,
1973, to consider funding alternatives for Sanitary District facilities and
the adoption of ordinances concerning sewage connection charges, be
postponed until February 1973.
The Council so requested this postponement during its regular meeting
December 5, 1972, and we would appreciate receiving statistical informa-
tion or any other material which may be helpful to us in the review of this
matter. This background information would also aid us in fully participat-
ing in the upcoming public hearings and provide us opportunity to express
Garden Grove's position on the alternatives.
Thank you for your consideration of this request and we look forward to
receiving the data.
Sincerely,
CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
CITY CLBRK .. ..;. '·
1 /vas
OFFICERS
Chairman of tlH• Board
Carl Krn1la
~loulton ~i:.tut>I \\" a!t•r ! >t~tril"l
Prt>sident and Genna/ llrlluJi<•'r
1.uri•·n !>. ·1 ruhill
Cliairman·Mem,1nsliip Rd:1liom
l! .. au l.!1·1nt•n,.
Bf' au Clt'IIll'llS ..\ :h" wialr'-
1airman-Citv Cl111mli1•n ld.-i . .-,,n-
• =::tn' Jrl 1\.1,. ·pd ... c:
mrll Douglas Astronautie• C1m1p;rn\·
Tr ... 1s1ir1•r
Rohrrt F. llan=-011
Arthur Youn:r ~\ l'.11ntiJall\
Cl1airman ExPc:ulit-t? Comniill"•'
E. II. Fi11·l•·r
Bovlr En~irw•·rin:.: PrP~irlPnt, St>0
n11tor., C/ul1 ·
l.011 h···l-..11
Prrk Family Colonial Fuwral !lorn~
DIRECTORS
J)('rrirk A . .-\11.kr~on
Fra11k L. Hope & A~~(J•·i.•t•·!'
Winn lland\·
Airporlt•r Inn llott:I
Huv 1:. Hult
·f\,, il-.~d
llon.ild \\'. Bo\ l",i
Airport St'n11·1·. hu'orp•1r.~tt-d
Ik.rn t.l• 1111·11~
Ur.au Clernrrt" & .-\:.:•'•"ial":<
H. W. Cliifonl
Air Calif,,rnia
Edward 0. EtJu-11
Aut11ndir-.
E. II. Fin•trr
Hovle En~irwr·rin:!
Ihiht>rt E. li.111-nn
Arthur Young..\ Co111p.1m
John ll.1-k.-ll
Br-eco. l.i1rn t•·<i
IL Hc>Cl:!rr II •Y.-r·ll
Hu tan S•. Tu··l-.i-r
Frnton E. Jonr"
\Vest Orangr County \l11nicip:1l Cnurt
Leon I:. Jon•·.:
Jones, Elliott & .\,.•o··i.ilf•
Gordon lPllf':'
Thr. In inf' Cnnipany
Str\' art K· •i·pi:-1-.e
·nnrll Douglas Astronautic;; Lomp.im·
' :\11\.och
1rlu•is-'f rimllc ~'\: ~clson, lnrorfH•r.tlt>d
<:arl K\mla
Moulton '.'ii;zuf.'! Watrr I li~triet
Will IL Limk1y. Jr.
Con~ul tinl! E11:.::i1wer
John ll. \lrrrrll. ll
\halt & \lr•mll Joe \lrConnirk
Ern!"t ,'\. Ern,;t
\Id \liller
Bani-. of :\nwric·n
Westinghou:;e F.lcctrir C:oqmration
!J.,lr Po~t
;t Amt'rican Titlt' ln~ur.aner Compilny
J.ime-I:. :--.dl•·r
Kin~bcrl) .CLirk Lorpo: .. t111:l
l~1d .. T<l .I. :-rr.:t.h
Hunt.\\es~ L><ril·. [·~, • •rJ'·,~:.t!•·d
\!1::.:: ,, . l', 1;:."~
R.al~lt 1 '"''~·'I'
' ' ~ ... .: ....... ~ ·~i : .. -
NG~ COUNTY
CHAMBER OF COMM~RCE
401 BANK OF AMERICA TOWER, THE CITY• ONE CITY BLVD. WEST, ORANGE, CALIF. 92668 • 17141 639·6460
December 8, 1972
Mr. Fred Harper
General Manager
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
Post Off ice Box 8127
Fountaj.n Valley, California 92705
Dear Fred:
We have received a request from the Garden Grove
Sanitation District requesting a delay in the
public hearing on the proposed sewer connection
charge.
If there are no technical difficulties with such
a change we would like to suggest that this re-
quest be given consideration.
Cordially,
Will Lindsay, Jr., Chairman
Sanitation Task Force
WL/jwc
Age nda I t e ms No s . 45 , 4 6 , 4 7 & 48
S CAl £ 1·~ ~PPliO>' .J AO
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY• C ALI FO RNIA
DISTRICTS
AND
TRUNK SEWERS
1971
•.!.:
(l
rJ~;;-~~(i/~t;.)
;'i/,.:-...4.~.(i'ZAC# ~
f ~,.....L!\'!+~_-..,-..._~~~~~1.7S6 % 0 A")
1J..~)
~
N0 r£ 5,,.,,, 111-11 "'l/11'11
Oilfr.CI No7 art
'M;i111~Pla,,· s~rs
:::~ ;:;,::':::....~~
~.J~, c;::f1,/.~
{_/'-
./
Agenda Items No s. 45 , 46 , 47 & 48
SCA L C 1 •, J!.PPllOX J M l
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNI A
DISTRICTS
AND
TRUNK SEWERS
1971
THI RD SEWER l
~AINTENANCE
DISTRICT
' '
I,
"
,'VO!C, $1 .. 1 11 J l!tlW'fl •1/f)J11
°'"'~' M>, tiff ·u,n1,.,,,a,f J-u
:'cZ'i ~:;,::'::,r;.,,,o;:..,
~l/1fl lJ1tlflCl1 ,Sttl
{)(11nc/ No.~li/ffs . ./\.,..
(
/
\ ....... /
JSE
H 91 30
(Excerpt ed f rom
Octob er 4, 1 9 72
t he comm ittee a pp!auc'l.s a nd wish es t o
enc ou rag e stro ng-SLite construct i on as-
s is t ance p ro:?r:u!ls .
M r . Speaker . in conclusion , I urge
th a t. t his r 0nf Pr.-.nr-0 ':'C:Jo rt r eceivE' p
u n a nimous vo t e. O t;r country n eed s e f-·
f~c L i \'e 'l';atcr pollution control legis la -
t1 on . \Ve can p ro\'ide it wday b v o ur ac -
tions. ·
Mr. JOHN30!': of C alifornia. Mr.
S peaker, I have been prinleged to serve
a s one o! the HotL>e conferees on the
water pollu\.ion c.mtrol bill. Under the
able l crr d e r shi p of the gent leman fr om
Jl.l a ba ina we h a ~·e h "nunered out a bill
Li ia t r e pres ents a \·ic Lo r y for all w ho want
to cl ea n up t he Nat!on·s r i\·ers. streams.
a nd la k es. and who look to Cong ress fo r
env iron men lal le a dership.
I ca ll yo u r att.emion to a m a jor pro-
v is ion i n this b iJl-the funding provi -
s ion-in wh ic h I k~ow .Memb ers of t he
H ouse h ave p :nt1cula r inte rest. ·we :i r e
aware o f i h e ded icat:on and the d eter -
m inat io n of State a nd l ocal o ffic ials to
dea l wiLh their water pollution prob-
l e ms. b u t 1'.'e know. too. the utter frus tra-
tion t hey face in raisir:g the necessa ry
f unds. There ha1·e b een e s t!mates a ll over
the ballp a r ~ as to 'l\'hat will be r eo u ired
to o nce again make o ur r frers and· lakes
p lac es w e cnn enj oy and be proud o f. The
H 0 us e a nd tl~e co nfer ence com mi ttee
h a ve looked very car eiull y a t the m atter
of fun ding. You may r ecall t hat t he bill
tha t 1rn s~cd t his body l:lst ;:\l arc h called
for author izi n g a little m or e than S24 .6
b ill ion. t h e Senat e b ill a u thorize d S20
billion. :ind the ad.m inist r ation reau e s tcd
$6 b illion . T he c onferees h a ye a:n:eed on
C.55 Cnt ialiy the same fi;;ure as i n the
H ouse bill, $24.6 b illion f o r the pi:riod
through fiscal 1975 . A t ot.al o f $1 8 bil-
lion of t h is sum is f or con s truction
grants. an d breaks d own n ot to exceed
$5 bill ion for fi scal 19 13, S6 b ill ion fo r
fi sca l 1 974. and $7 bil lio n for fi s cal 197 5.
Natu r a lly, the la r ge dinerence in what
the administration a .-ked. and . ..,.·ha t the
confere n c e b ill proYides. raises the ques-
t ion of ,,·!Jy the substamial discr epancy?
T here is on ly on e answer t.o that and
j t i s that if we set out t.o do t.lli s j ob
there i s. no way we can a ccompli sh it
'l'.ithout p aying t he p lice. If 1i;e w ant
cl ean water. we ha ve to pay f or c lean
water. If we wa nt t.h e S t.ates a nd citie s
t o m oYc aggress i ve !~-a h ead in building
waste t reatment p lan ts they mus t h a l'e
Federnl a id . and t h ey m ust h ave con fi -
dence tha t Was hington will contin ue . to
lil'e u p to i Ls com mitm e n ts.
This n eed f o r a depend'.lble. conl in -
uing Fecl e rnl c.ommitment is the basis fo r
t h e contract obligation autho1ity whic h
h as been relain ed i n t he c onferen c e bil l.
Construction p roj ects can be ini tiat ed as
s oon as the Admin istrator approYes
t hem . but there '"ill be n o m ajor spen d -
iJ1g Impact umil fiscal i9-;5,
T h e confr rence bill pro\ides !or the
F edera l Go\·ernment to pay 'i5 percent
of the costs of a con;,muni ty's waste tre'.lt -
m ent p l a n t. leaving it up to t he S tates
a n d l oc :1l communities t.o come u p wit!1
the r e m aining 25 percent. T here a re n o
·r es trictions on h ow they ca n rais e t heir
2:. percent
The b111 reported b? the conference
·imposes n reqwrement that publi cly
. H 9 131
CO NGRE S$I ONAL RECO RD -HOUSE )
...
Octobe r 4 , 19 72 COJ
o·wned treatment works provide second-
a ry treatment a.~ defmcd by the EPA Ad-
ministrator in projects that come L'!.to
existence by Jo..nu:!.ry l. 1()76. TI1is is part
of our objteLive of e::i rmn~LL:ng i_,._.i..iu l-a.J.lt.S
from point sources Jr.do! incluc:ing pub-
licly o v;ned sys tems within that obiec-
tlve. I n defining the term "second'arv
treatment'' u nder the provisions of sub:. ...
section 304 ( b) (1 > m > and sut-section
304(d) <1>1 the Administratol' h?..s the
d iscreti on to find that the "sccond:>.ry
t reatment" requiremen t l s met by a l-
t ernative means. For example. in the
c ase o f deep ocean water d ischarges
through ocean outfalls , the Administra-
tor could d eterm..ine that "secondary
treatment" r equirement s are met in th:i.t
situation where the cl isc lluges have first,
r ccei\•ed primary t rcat.men t. second,
complied with r egulations governin g the
di scharge of he<1.l'Y mNa ls and oc.he r
toxic subst.a.nces and. Lhird, v:hcre the
publicly ow·ned ao;:ency has demo11str ;<ted
that suc h occ::i.n d!sci1:11·ges arc not in-
consis tent v.ith tl1c purposes of t he act
a.nd do not hann or c ncia n!;'er Lhe diver-
sity, pro<lucti\ity and stability of th.e
marine ecosystem.
I t would be was teful of public funds
to d efine "seconc!ary L1 er.r,ment" in such
a fashion as to r equire expensive facili-
t ies t.o achie\·e a d cg:·ec of Lreatment
v.-hlch, under the pr:ictica1 circnmstances
e xisting. would be t umcl:cssnry.
· T h e d iscr etion co n ie rred u p on the Ad-
m inistr a tor s hould be exercised by him
only a fte r he has determined th:i.t wha t -
e ver p rocesses or aci.ions cons tirnt.e "sec-
o ndary treatment" co nform with :i.nd are
c ons is t ent with the objcctl\·es o f the a ct
and t hat t hey are t ccimic::tllv and e co-
n omically fea si bl e. Moreove 1:, I believe
t hat a n y publicly own ed system bears t l1e
b urden of demonst rn1in g to t he ridm..i n -
lstrator t hat t his will be Lile cr.s e.
·Mr. S peaker , I would call the atten-
tion of t he Rouse to one other section
o f t he b ill t hat pro\id cs aul!10riz;nicn
!or c on struction grants. and that i s sec-
t ion 3 <b > on page 90 of Lile conference
r eport. Under thls sec tion, n ot to e:.;ceed
$3 50 million Is au t horized fo r p·ar:ts
und e r section 8 oi t he existi.llg Ped eral
Water P o lluti on Control Act ior the fis -
c a l yea,r t hat ended l n,st J w1e 3 0.
T he F ederal s h :!.re of g r ants fo r t r e a t -
m ent wo rks construction s h all b e the
s ame as t hat a uthorized by section 20 2
o f the c ommittee r eport. I t is the i nter:t
of the c onfer ees iilat the allocat.ion oi
the $35 0 million s h all be made in accord-
a n ce ~.it h section 8 of existing law. E x-
cept for r eallocated f unds. there is n o
provision in section 8 for d iscretionar y
al~oc ati ons . The conferees believe that
the needs for cons truction gran ts exceed
t he d ollars available for lhe fisca l year
e n din g J une 30, 1972. a.lld i t is exoected
that t here will be esse ntiall y n o. fisc al
year 19 72 f unds a.rail a ble for discretion-
ary rea llot.m ent.
Mr. S peaker, at this time I wo ul d like
to call t he a ttentio n of the H ouse t o two
t ypoi;,'1·apllic al e r r o r s in sccLio n 3 . t h e
s ection to which I refe r. T he fi rst sen-
tence of bot h sections \:\.) and (b) shou ld
r ea d:
There Is nuthor l.zed t o be np propriated for
t he fiscal y ea.r endlog J une 30 , J 97:.l , n ot, (I
repeat, not ) to exceed, n.nd so !o.n h .
4 •
r .. ~ .... : ..
:,
t ·:
I
! : . ~l--.. j
. .. .. . ,,._.... . .... •·· ....... . ·.
·'
Cb.) lnterceptorE and outfalls ~ l:he ccst. o! that..
fnoill ty wh.ich would not incrense. axn beyond the. cnpo.ci ty
· ·:>.\: .. ~.~·.·~::.~·;::l'ndi·c~tcd .. · in·. tho· ·f6llowing:.-.tru,10::... ··
S mqd or .. lcsg
6 mgd or. gr~ nte:r ...
ever .. is: Ir.ore, res t.:i:icid ve.
Total. E1iylbl~
f.Ex~ac}. t.:t .r .. ~T.!.~
. ..
~-~··.-:: t:.:-_;. •' .::..: •• : ~·..-.. :·. ;# ._. •. 1"'-,;. "• .:t ............... ;~ • .,.• ·T-• - - . -· • ... ·••. •-........ • ··:·• • ·~~ • •: -"';,~: ••:, •• ":' .~ .... :_; ... •.•.,,;:::.• :...! •
· · oi.ty linu. tit tJ_r;n~ in p~:-nqz-~ph { tl) nnd par nq:n1ph (i> !: · · · -·
· • .:.• ......... ~···• ••• ~·. ••• ••• tt• • H4 I • •• •• It •.t 91 .: •• •• • • •:• :10•: ~~ j~: •,• • . .,•,• •., • .• • .. • • • • ., • • • ••• t .·~• ,_..,. ,:•
f!l.~hf !l_ e~_:')tj._'?_!).~ .. ~)e;~ .. a! tJ1on9h in? li 9iblo would be cal-· •.. ..........
..
. .... . . .... .. .. ... .. . -.
culnted on-an L1cre~ntal coet basia .•
ln consitl~_l:.i.t.HJ etla liri~ infill.:r at.i011 capnci ty,
infilt:r;uti~n thrit can be co~rected by w.ore fe·.1sibl-s.
ma·ans. Cnpnci ty f~r. futl!l;e~ infiltration shall. ~e
limi ted .. t.c !'l!')wg that can lJe t})!~1;¢tr.:d wi tJl ti 9ht. and
p::operly instElled. conduit eys t:~ms·•
J;11Iing · thcEe· fiscal y~a:::a tha-c Gi:c·up Il.l. projects·
are not. eligible for. tJ~arrt par.ti¢! pat1on, Ci1pac1 ty
incluc!od in Cl~ss B interceptors which t;Grvcs ro9ion~l
~ur~ceef?·. anc!· which me·ets the: ~ri te.:ia ... ci.pplied tc Class
I\--"---·
A 1nt.i~t'c~pter$ $h~ll be eli9i:t;,lo for 9:r:~nt ast·>istan¢C
•.
I
. -
. ~-
I
" . . ~
·~. "')_ .
,,
. .
,•; .,
prcjGcta which sel.-ve e-xpall~lcn <d' c:d.!Jtin~1 communit:iez
in nccord~nca with the prcvis~~1s of tti$ $~c~lon.
Grunt.a will no{; pe m.ltl(i ~w<tJ.l(ililo for prc-jects to ee~ve
to se~.ve a~nas \·1hich wo::::-s designed prima~ily
c _.r -;' 1~,,f;"! .... ,,. ... .... ,,
ing_ pollati~n p:?:(\b~tr ig of. cve.rrici1HJ .intf;Ottan-;-J. In
the 1.attor. <)~So, grM"t pu:rticipaticn. shall be. dele~mined
io ac~orr.?wv. .. "'<..\ with· the prc;rit:ions cf thin gect.icn e~~epl!
th·~t-cc·s b; cf. facility c?.tpaci ~y j )\ e~et':~s <)~ tho c~plt(:i t.y
linrl.tat.ions in (~) Mel. (b) · «J:.ove ~lt-j1c-.ugh ineligibl~ will
!.."'e:. calculatet.l on ~ prorntu b'1sis t iUlU nc-t. on· the basie
cf inc.r~rrJ;)n tal. CGn.t. \'la.ete treat:men!; f;u:;.i li ~ice fr:r.
. . .
• hj• T;hf;! 9~ant p~1)9.Lit.m l;ut :5ho.uld ~ ·p:!:ovidEil-at. the.· ex:..· ..
vcn~c of dovol~~ers... thia provision is n01: .. ic·teneed to.
lJ.TtU. f.:Otl f~.nds ~ .. ndl~le to correct. pollution prtJbli>n'.S. .
( c~ Il"J the event f;.ha~· a p.Yoµc)~f:d w~~-l;t.l'r.-:s.te.r tro.!\t--
rtliAnt. Er.¢)1.~ct wi 11 :.~orv~ p~cr;.c·s~e dt=v'=lc:-pr:ien-t t.hut will ... ... -. -.
oc:cu!.·. with in th~ t't)\.md~= ic~ r; £ a Cri ti c~l Jdr .?..rr.> ~ eos ~ q-•·n••,. ......,_...:..«.
p_a:-f:.c_&;: .. :~.::t~h. 9x._tr.r:; ~t.~t-t' ,.. . .A1r Hl!:oc-urc~P Bc-tl:!:'d ~ eliqib 10
E~Oj~ct ccsts sh~11 h~ ci~~ern-~nse ns provided in th~s
. I
-3-·
. ·~
r ,
I \
. -~ .... :· .... · .. ::;.. .. ·
. :: ~;·'·;.
·-::.· -· .·
:; ...
.. ~~.
• :1 .:i • h ca· -/: ' . . i · . bl m; I?r<.;.v.l (.G \.t 1 n p {tr ~.9.~ __ ....... 1_o_~_t_1_u __ .. r=_~_~_c_t __ 1_ ........ -__ n_,.._..e> ___ 1_r. ..... !_1 __ ~_
p:r'jj<:ct CGEts sh<lll nc,t exceed. the c~·ats i?.IJS<:·ciated
Rerv<~ c~~aci i;V t.o ti?t'H~t nct·!~ls o.~<)j(~!....~cd ~i \'<.? yu~r:..; l11.m0"~ t
......... ~-,.............,~~.,. 't ,..,.,..,.~ ........ ...__..._._.._'\..~-· ...... ~ • ..,. .. ..1r--~--------·---------
f
bo:i:onti. th~ unti~iPut~d nwnrcl c f;thE: DY-incir.:~1 ·cc·n~~ruct~~l!
C!°'f\~:.~~ct. !l' t.})(.'t OV(?n~· tl'tc) li!;t.!~H)V c:_!c:;?-<:ld<;~ tt~ c;onst.1·\~~t ..... ~.~~1->#~....,._._,pa~ .............................. ~ ........... ~ ..... ~lllP"'-\.Z.e.....,,...,.,,......._,.___....,....__, 4 -....~ . ...,,..., ___ ..._.._.. __
t.he o;--c-tt.~ct wit.h it ref;(n·vo ceu.at~it.v in <~:t.c::<.:~tt c! t-J~is. ~-1 . .,J.:.,,....,,..,£..:.~1L·.._~ I r ·~...,,,,.,., • ...,...,..,,,.,,.~.._.l'_.""-.._---~--.i. :.JI.....,.----=--.~...,,..__._._, " · ~ ........._,,...
b.a..qed en curren~ t---=c.~a~t:.1:~f!nl ~f Finc.1h<:t-: ncr)Ulati!'>r, ~a.ta,
~....r:-~......,..-:iir.....w.,...;N>.1 ---...:.......c-,_~_...4/'a~~,...,-~, •. •=-~·~.;>S_,.,,,.._, .,, ci• ::;;..,.........,
~."E-J"C:~ ,li~\i t.r.!d tc ,ti:.~~;:~!.atinn p~oj;!Ct.i~1w ~g ~abli2h~d by
one or mort< <;ountio3, (d.t1.os, O!: tbo~o of e3n (\xle.tin:z
((! l -•
el~~~~~. E!-v:l J..9..'~~~.!!J-2~~~)~.~~Lf~CS.~~~~t. and
,{b} cf this ne~t.ton, y!"!>Vido.d it ~(;~o nrd nm~ th,.1 t t.ht.:: f ~(~$
described in eubnaJ.:aq:r5phe· (1) , (2) nr1d en I er in· thG
!1t~Ynativ~ '~~~.t::-tW~~-:'!E.12£-::r~:~r~)~., ~!l~:.s't
... ..., . <!> The '.'/~:§t~·utor-p~oicct -is ~ cr"'~t;en-tly
f4 .
needed p;irt. cf tha nppli~ilh.le ~~sin l,lu.n MJ i:; ni::;~ C'-'f::-·
\ .
\\ I
\ ~ I
-~--
I
14
r ... • <r'.
1-...
• . !'t-
1 ·
I· ~
r
~
~: . ~
L
t-
!'
I·
~. :: ~
I ..
t.
l• !;
!~ .. .
..
•' 't~
..
-
~-
..
I
~
<!: •
: . .,
. .
• .
: ·.·. ,.· •.
I .,·
,, ~-:. ·· ...
: f .-.
able. of b~i nq rj.t~:;inn:Jd und conat.rucc.~·!d en a r.~)(~\\l·~L"
..... v _...,.. ... ,"'""' .. "4~ ............_..~ ............. _., !&:! ••lea
{2) Thu;:c {!; a !5olf-limit:i.nq oarl cf the
f acilitiu~ of whJ.<..:h 5. t is a tart tha~ liJ11i..t:a
~~ .......... ~---------------------
tho u:;;e c·f th~ cal?_ac.i t:Y ...... l?.£ .. J-lir~.J'.l:'::;~:-(n'l'~tr.n:· ~·roiect to .
'.>1'v\·.J_ (.t~: ... N,..
a canac! ~" P. l.d f1'. oicnt tt.) .serve t1!:~ ~-">-6!"\u-="':~(1 dpun lOPTI\l;-:.n t -----------~,;...-.4~.,....,,... ........ ~ ~#-.....-...4, \,:; ..,._OI -t'f I ;e ... • ,&.J .~• ..... -e • "-""' #-•.. •
in the·Crit~c.~~ . ..!'lJ:.J're(t fo~ « p~:__Liod of f~vG ye.:n:n ..
bt:yvnd tt .. ft. <lilt~ of .ant..if.!! .. t~~·0'·1 .. ~"a=d of tho I?r1nci Eil~ ..
_c_o_n_s_t_":£_u_c_t.:_·_i_.:_-r_1_c_o_n_t_.r_a_, _c_t.. __ • __ ............ 'fl ..... 1 ..... '-_~ ..,.., __ f,,...i '!2:;Y,<J \\ r: f ~.::ro c ns t · rouv bs .
b;mGd c.n cut·rf!nt. r:~~.t":'t.'lt~ !,?,f F~~~·~ p.mu~ntion dutu,
o:-· such other. infc-~at ic-1' ae mav bo ft'n1i l ~1~) .. !?:~-=--~.fl~:Jll.fil.!:9-
~E ... \!..SJ}.:r~i. t?r.1 to pcpulutic~1 pxojeGtions. t~BJ.:.~ h~~~~q
tt
(3 ~ T!lc:. Bo~1~c.i de b~rmineE. th:J t tJ~~ pxoj~ct:.
-l ~H•~ •A• """~.a ~,.I . • .. • '• .. ~' ~ ~• • .;.,.,.. .... ""'~'..-t.'"••..,,.., -.,..,.......,..,..., .,.._~.,...,.....t\.•;J~·7'J~ .. ··M·• ~ .t··~..-.!'\,.•••••·•.;..#;.."-'·U r~-"';.\WaA\,'l;~.U~--i~fic.:ct: n.s~·1d envir~1u:: .. ti1~t:"~. ?;f(!~~~:.t . ...:·Lt~.lc .. y ro1~t.inq thv~c..=-'!:'.o_ .
!·
.. .. .. =·
i~ ..
..
• ~' ~·-;:J:~i.J,.
have sp~cifi,~c.11~ ~n.?~~~ti,~-~)~ .. ~l~~~l.,~~~_!(d ~x!.stin1,
the project. and f:11.t_.1}£c:~~ t~~rn~ l~to air ~nd w~ttJ r·
gu~.1.!11 ~)~n)l~~~g~m.~· Md 0bjecti•.!eE. Acfu ticnrlllz,
the·· gzant npnlicatim\ l n; ... 0.~~ct ,_ .. t:~(lr{-., ·an1,.! ct•'' i ronrrr.m tal ~;;..;;;...--'------~.&:..-------al..'"",-·~--·-.. .,.,.. ' ... "~.......-..... ~~
...
ttiu i'ifft~,)t tt:.!t~· th(.t ~r:r:lic.Mt ncknc.wlef!r;~s thnt· in· in-·
Wl>W & 3 WC la ..
.. .
• . . . ..s.~... . ..... ,_ ....
,,,
•.
\,
.!'
~es wl~ere the Board determine~ eligible project costs on the bmis ..
of this paragraph {d) relative to a project in a Critical Air Arco, that
y1hcn tho need to e;<par.d any ports of the overalt ~rojects ari~cs, th.'1rebl
utifizin_g the additional capacity pcrmiHed to be constructed on thi$
basis, such may not occur or may be de fayed dependent on the extent
to which oir qudity objectives presently being formufa~ed arc
accomplished or are in the procc~s of being odcquotefy accomplished.
('!) The project is being cot1'structcd ~ofcfy to
Improve water quolity or to accomplish recreational purposes and wilJ
not ~rovide wastewater treatment facilities to setve cdditionol deve!opw
----------------------------------------~~------------_._-
ment in a Critical Air Area,,
Chairman Finnell
Report of the Joint Chairman
Call meeting of the Executive Committee for 5:30 p.m., Wednesday,
January 3rd. .-(-?·_JJ,X .. c. ~,: C~-"-~,J --~~~-c~~-,7:.j 0
Invite Directors .Ste]3flensen a§:t_ McWh~ or Director~and
Rogers, to attend and participate--m--the discussions. \S' -
Report on meeting of Association of Metropolitan Sewerage
Agencies in Washington, D.C., November 28-30, 1972.
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
Post Off ice Box 8 127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain' Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
De c embe r 8 , 1972
REGULAR MEETI NG
Wedn e sday, December 13, 1 972
7 :30 p.m.
Th e fo llowing is a b r ief explanation of t he more
important n on -routine it ems which appear on the enc l osed
agenda and wh ich a r e not oth erwi se s e l f -exp l a nato r y .
Warrant l ist s are not a ttache d to t h e a genda s i nce t h e y are
made up imm e diat e ly prec e din g t he meeting but wi l l a ppe a r i n
the c omp l ete agenda avai lable a t the meeting .
J oint Boards
No . 6 -Re p ort of t h e Joint Cha irma n -The Joi nt Ch a irman
will r e po rt on meetings he and I a tt end ed in Wash i ngt on , D.C.,
r ela t i ve to the 1972 Federa l Water Po lluti on Co n t r o l Am e nd -
ments ·Wh i ch are now being imp leme nt e d by t he Envi r onm enta l
P ro tec tion Agen cy .
No . 1 2 -Repo r t o f the Execut ive and Building Committ e e s
a nd Acti ons on t he Comm i ttees ' Recommendations -The Commit tees
met on the evenin g of December 6th, with Di rector Kymla as a
g u e st . A wri tten r eport on t his meeti ng , t6geth er with th e
r e c omm e n dations t o t he Joi nt Boar ds , is included with the agenda
mate ria l . The .e x ecuti ve session no t ed on t he agen da con cern s
r ecen t "m eet -a nd -confer 11 discussions with r e p resen tat i ves of t h e
Orange Co unty Emp l oyees Association .
No . 13 -Consent Ca l enda r -The f o l l ow i ng agenda i t e ms fa l l
into this cat egory i n accordan ce wi th the defini t ion es t ab lished
b y the Boar ds :
(a ) Ch a n ge Orde r for I n t erp l a n t Influent I n tercepto r,
J ob No . I -8 -Th i s Ch ange Orde r r e p rese n ts an added
cost of $8,682 .17 . The con tractor was requi red to
p rovi de a d d i tional bedd i ng r ock in a r eas wh ere t h e r e
were l aye r s of peat , wh i ch made ove r -excavati on
n e c essa r y . I n addition , the contracto r encountered
a l arge con c r ete obs truc t ion whic h was n ot shovm on
the p l ans . Al so , we r equired a sewe r connecti on to
serve the Di strict s ' new shops a n d wa r ehou se . It is
r ecomme n ded that the Change Or der be a p p r oved .
(b) Deny Claim for Damages -The City of Fountain
Valley and a local resident have filed with the
Di stricts formal claims for damages a lleged l y caused
by the contractor constructing the Interplant Influent
Int erceptor on Br ookhurst south of Ellis Avenue . It
is the General Counsel's r ecomme ndation that the claims
be denied and the matter be referred to the Districts '
contractor, Kord i ck and Rados, a joint venture .
(c) Authorization for the General Manager to Attend
WPCF Workshop in Detroi t on December 12th -During the
Joint Chairman 's and General Manager 's visit to the
Environmental Protection Age ncy headquarters in
Wa shington, D.C., it was suggested by several officials
that the Distric ts be represented at a one -day workshop
on 1 972 Amendments to the Water Pollution Control Act,
to be held in Detroit on December 12th . The program
provides for an interchange between Washington EPA
staff personne l and management representing major
ag:encies. The action appearing on the agenda ratifies
the General Manager's attendance at this workshop, as
recommended by the Exe cutive Committee .
(d) Award of Chlorine Contract -The current contract
to purchase chlorine will expire December 31st, there -
f ore, new contract bids were received on December 6th .
Th e specifications call for a one -year contract , with
the Districts' option to renew for an additional one
year period . Three bids were r ece ived, and the apparent
low bidd e r is Georgia Pacific Corporation at $112 .70 pe r
ton .
(e ) Purchase of Engine Analyzing Equipment Unit, Six
4-Wheel Electric Cars, One 1/2-To n Pickup Truck, Three
1-Ton Fl at Bed Trucks, Fou r 1-Ton Cab and Chassis, and
One 16,ooo lb . GVW Truck with Articulated Hyd raulic
Crane -The purchase of · this equipme~t was -includ e d in
t his year 's budget , and eight of the equipment items
are r epl acements . A bid tabulation is included with
the agenda material .
(f) Purcha se of Modified Heads and Manifolds for
Waukesha Sludge Gas Engin es -The staff is recommending
that the negotiat e d exchan ge and purchase of parts for
the sludge gas e ngines be approved (see enclosed memo -
randum f rom the Districts ' Maintenance Superintendent).
-2 -
No. 15 -Report and Recommendation of the General Counsel
Pertaining to the Award of Job No . P2 -21, Digesters N and o.
On November 21, the Districts opened bids for the construction
of t wo additional digesters at Treatment Plant No . 2 . These
structures will be built in the digester complex at the plant
as a par t of the 1971 -72 State and Federal Grant construction
p r ogram. State and Federal authorities have approved 80%
funding of the project. This matter, however, has been referred
to the General Counsel since these facilities will be constructed
withi n 1 ,000 yards of the ocean, which means we may be subject
t o the provisions of Proposition 20, the recently-adopted Con-
sti tutional Amendment affecting development along Californi a 's
coast l ine . Mr . Nisson will report at· the meet i ng .
No . 1 6 -Proposed Change in Clean Water Grant Program -The
State Water Resources Control Board is considering a change in
the i r Grant regulations which would establish restrictions on
the size of facilities to be constructed to existing needs plus
f i ve years of growth in "critical air areas". If this regulation
i s adopted as proposed , most of Southern California will be
a ffected and serious financial burdens may be placed on our
taxpayers as a result. It has been suggested by several managers
of other water and wast ewat e r agencies in Orange County, that a
unifi ed position pap er b e prepared suggesting an alternative to
the proposed regulation change which would be mo re equitabl e
and still accomplish the results desired by the State Board .
The Districts' Executive Committee has requested that the staff
p r epare a report for the Boards on this matter to be presented
at Wednesday 's meeting .
District No . i1
No . 25 -Approving Grant of Easement to Southern California
Edison Company re: Newland-Hamilton Pump Station Site -The
staff r ecommend s that an easement be g ranted to the Southern
California Edison Company to install underg round utilities
behind the curb line of the improved street at the Dis trict 's
Newland -Hamilton Pump Station site . The grant of this easement -
will insure that in the event improvements or additions are
mad e at the pump station which conflict with the Edison Company's
utilities, they will be r e locat ed at no cost to the District .
Districts Nos . 5 and 6
No . 30 -Oversizing Pacific Coas t Highway Sewer Crossing
to S erve Hoag Hospital and Surrounding Area .-I n June of this
year, the Boar ds of Dis trict s Nos . 5 and 6 authoriz e d the
ne gotiation of an agreement f or the oversizing of a Coast
Highway Sewer crossing in connection with replacement of a
-3-
portion of the Districts ' Trunk A in the Coast Highway . If
an agreement can be consummated, a distinct savings can be
reali zed by the Districts inasmuch as we would be paying onl y
for the overs izing of the sewer . The proposed construction
is contemplated to be done by the contractor for the Districts'
Contract No . 5 -1 9, which is presently under construction . The
work involves the install ation of 350 feet of 24-inch pipe ,
80 feet of which must be jacked under the Coast Highway . The
Change Order tot als app r oximately $32,000 . The Districts'
share would amount to approximately $12,000, with District
No. 5 paying 87% and Dis trict No . 6 13%. The entire matter
is pending a deci sion of Hoa g Hospital officials . Hopefully,
this will be resolved by Wednesday 's Board meeting .
District No . 6
No. 35 -November 8th Joint Meeting Agenda Items -At the
November 8th meeting of the Joint Boa r ds, D is~rict No . 6
Directors were unable to act on Joint items because of the lack
of a quorum . It is recommended that the action appearing on
the agenda be approved which covers the Joint meeting items
that we~e app r oved by the other Sanitation Districts on Novembe r
8th.
District No . 2
No. 39 -Status Re port on Anahe im Hi ll s Annexation -To
date_, .the propon e nts of this annexation have not r e turne d
executed copies of the agreements authorized by the Board ;
therefore, this annexation has not been finalized . If the
annexation fees , or in this case the executed agreements, are
not submitted to the District by Dec embe r 29th, the annexation
fees will incre ase. Attached to the agenda are copies of letters
to the proponents advising them of this situation .
No . 40 -Employment of Appraiser for Contract No . 2 -14 -
Inc l uded in the agenda material is a letter from the General
Counsel recommendin g the employment of Everett S . Schmid as
appraiser fo r the Distri ct in the acquisition of rights of
way for the cons truction of Contract No . 2 -14 . Mr . Schmid's
per diem rate is $15 .00 per hour.
No . 41 -Change Order to Contract No . 2 -14-1, Santa Ana
River Interceptor, Sully -Miller Contrac tin g Company , Contract or .
This Change Order has been r equ ested by the contractor to
i ncrease the s i ze of the lined concr ete pipe from 72 -inch to
78-inch at no additional cost to the District . It is the
staff 's r e commendation t hat the Change Order be approved .
No . 44 -Adjournment -It is recommend ed that the Boa rd
adjourn to 7:30 p .m., December 20th, wh i ch is the date se lected
by the Boa rd to conduct public hearings on the proposed Connection
Charge Ord inance (Ordinance No . 203).
-4-
Di s trict No . 7
Nos. 45, 46 and 47 -Annexations Nos . 26, 27, and 30 -The
fees have been received on t hese pending annexations which have
been previously approved by the Board of Directors. It is
recommended that res o lutions be adopted to complete the annexa -
tion proceedings .
. No. 48 -Status Report on Proposed Annexation No . 28, Tract
No. 7389 -The proponents of this annexation have not submitted
the fe es to complete this proposed annexation to the Dis trict .
Enclosed for the Di rectors' informat i on is a copy of a letter
from the District to the proponent, advising that the annexation ·
fees will increase on January 1, 1 97 3.
District No . 3
No . 52 -Addendum No . 1 to Contract No . 3 -17-1
Trunk Sewer, Reach , an Bo s a Avenue S orn Drain or e Ci y
of Westminster) -This contract provides for the construction of
a 33 -inch sewe r in Bolsa Avenue from Newland to Magnolia in the
City of Westm~nster . In addition , the contractor will install,
as a part of the contract, a storm drain for the City of
Westminster . The contract will b e administered by Di strict
No . 3o This addendum is merely a clarification of ASTM specifi -
cations .
No . 54 -Further Consideration of Routing of Knott Interceptor .
At a special meeting of the District Board on De c e mb er 7 , the action
concerning the routin g of the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract
No . 3 -18 through the City of Westminster was deferred t o December
13 pending investigation of a possible route adjacent to the
Southern Pacific railroad tracks in the vic inity of Hoover and
Hazard Avenues . The engineers have been directed to analyze and
prepare an es timate for this newly-s u ggested route for the Boa rd's
consideration .
No. 55 -Ad j ournment -It is recommended that the Board
adjourn to January 3rd which is the time specified for a pub lic
hearing on the District 's proposed Connection Charge Ordinance
(Ordinance No . 303).
FAH:j
Fred A . Harper
Genera l Manage r
1-\.
~
~
f
I
I ;.
~ r
~ .
'
I .
'·. ! i ~: .. .
I , .
I
J. •. I :
~ l
I~,
n I. ! n
.!" ... -. '.... ... . .
Wl\TEU" GRM~T PRC1GR1.J.l F£GULl\T!()NS
pcBed ser.v1ce areat
(a)
or addition which would net increilsE· .. 1')t 11 b<?yund~ the.
capAci.tt indJ.cute-d in tha follo'td.119 tllhle:
l. mgcI. or.
2 m9d· ·
3 xr.gd
lese:.:
•
1.'o'tc.ll Bli qible: ·
£~12..ac~ ty· i.imi:t;:
.•
4 ll'qd::.
5-m~u or
4.0
3.5
3 ... 0
2.5
2 .. 0
nx"
"x"·
ttx"
UXA
".K"' I' .!· :
~l};\\•). .... .::· •• -·.#:~·~-~~--"5··J~.J.· -·· ---• ··~ . . .• t •·••• ··-·,~·1···;~-,.-:··:-.·· ··.:.
i. Jfw~~t··:'.~.7 .~ , . ....... ~ . ?~. ,~'(;yond t~1~~--~~r:.~-~~ .. ~i. -~~q~·?~t~·~:J }Q y~·n:::~--h~n~ .. , ~rf/~-~~/~~:/{'·:~.~-:
un~~:j/~~ .. ~· .. ~--·-~lii(;)Jc_:·Jc r. i ·; --~;~~·;~~-;~-~{{f{;"ffi;~):·: "Q;;<Y~p~({ th~t;: ~bpropr·i~~tvly ·:· .. _~·---~~ -~ ..
i~_.,,, .... ,.,. .•· "I ••• • • • . . . ,..,... ·-·· •• ·-. • ............. "-\.. ........... ·:: •• · :·:: '.· .. •• --·.. :-· .••• ·::_ •••. : . ,.. ..• ·. ·.: • . ..... ~ ·-:.--.~· ' .• ·•·.·
[ desi~ed hea(.'wMk foci litfo~-~C> a¢¢¢fft1'110datu :t"C~¢1\chlo
I
' !.
'.·-"'.
· · ftrroc~~t vxpan::;ion shnll be consi1ered m1 eligibla r.ro-·
. -1-·
I .
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
December 13, 1972 -7:30 p.m.
WARRANT NO.
19224
19225
19226
l9227
__)228
""!9229
19230
19231
19232
19233
19234
19235
19236
19237
19238
19239
19240
19241
19242
19243
19244
19245
19246
19247
19248
19249
19250
19251
19252
19253
19254
19255
19256
19257
19258
19259
19260
19261
19262
19263
19264
19265
19266
19267
19268
19269
19270
19271
19272
19273
19274
19275
19276
9277 ~9278
19279
19280
19281
19282
19283
19284
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Advance Electric, Rewind Motor $
All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings
American Compressor Co., Compressor Parts
City of Anaheim, Power
Anaheim Spring Co., Springs
Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Technical Manual
Apco Supply, Electric Supplies & Valves
Bank of America; Bond & Coupon Collection
Barton Sales, Metering Equipment
Bearing Specialty Co., Bearings
Bell Pipe & Supply Co., Pump Parts
Bell's Radiator Service, Truck Repair
Bird Machine Co., Centrifuge Parts & Freight
Black & Decker Mfg. Co., Tool Repair
Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Magneto Repair
Brenner Fiedler & Associates, Inc., Compressor
Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams
C & R Reconditioning Co., Engine & Pump Repairs
Cal Glass For Research, Inc., Lab Supplies
Cal's Cameras, Inc., Photo Supplies & Equipment
California Collator Sales, Printing Supplies
Certified Laboratories, Solvent
Chemtech Industries, Inc., Cleaner
Coast Auto Service Center, Truck Tires
College Lumber Company, Inc., Building Materials & Hardware
Concrete Tie, Building Materials
Consolidated Elect. Distr., Inc., Electric Supplies
Constructors Supply Co., Tools, Hardware & Supplies
Control Specialists, Inc., Regulator Parts
Paul A. Cooper, Grit Removal
Copeland Motors, Inc., Truck Parts
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Truck Parts
County of Orange, Maps _
County Sanitation District No. 2 of L.A. County,
Disposal Fee
Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage
Daily Pilot, Subscription·& Bid Notices
C.R. Davis Supply Co., Hose
John M. Deck, Equipment Parts
DeGuelle & Sons Glass Co., Equipment Mtce.
Del Chemical Corp., Lubricants
Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling
Diesel & Gas Turbine Progress, 'l'echnical c.Tournal
Ducommun Metals & Supply Co., Engine Parts
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies & Equipment
Electric Supplies Distributing, Electric Supplies
Electronic Balancing Co., Equipment Repair
Enchanter, Inc., Oc~an Research & Monj.toring (MO 12-14-66)
Envirotech Corp., Diffuse.r
Etalon Co., Equipment Repair
Fairfax Electronics,·-Inc., Communication Equipment
Fischer & Porter Co., Metering Supplies & Equipment
William Fox, Employee Mileage
Freeway Machine & Welding Shop, Machining (MO 2-9-72)
Fremont Bag, Drum & Salvage Co., Bags
City of Fullerton, Water
GAF Corp., Blueprint Repair
Garden Grove Lumber & Cement, Building Materials
General Electric Supply Co., Electric Supplies
General Telephone Co.
Georgia-Pacific Corp., Chlorine
Harlows Clocks, Equipment Repair
A-1
AMOUNT
746.86
162.54
491.66
12.42
72.46
19.25
241.64
18.99
337.16
417. 57
137 .66
32.00
207.63
11.75
263.33
270.87
101.50
3,034.50
93.30
687.97
24.19
81.00
32.00
308.98
954.97
41.58
637.13
747.76
87.89
1,008.00
20.29
249038
7.00
66.40
31.86
38.37
75.28
19.03
29.07
147.29
85.00
7.50
107.98
350.84
284.47
75.00
2,377.50
78.61
20.50
49.35
1,270.72
16.,50
1,338.00
144.90
1-t .97
19~20
69.30
1,114.82
201.63
3,566.07
15.50
WARRANT NO.
19285
19286
19287
19288
19289
19290
"'9291
~292
19293
19294
19295
19296
19297
19298
19299
19300
19301
19302
19303
19304
19305
19306
19307
19308
19309
19310
19311
19312
19313
19314
19315
19316
19317
19318
19319
19320
19321
19322
19323
19324
19325
19326
19327
19328
19329
19330
19331
19332
19333
19334
19335
19336
19337
19338
19339 .,9340
~341
19342
19343
19344
19345
19346
19347
IN FAVOR OF
Harrington Industrial Plastics, Plastic Pipe $
Hertz Equipment Rental Corp., Equipment Rental & Tools
Higgins Trucks, I~c., Freight
Hilti Fastening Systems, Hardware
Honeywell, Ince, Electric Motor
Howard Supply Co., Pipe Supplies, Tools & Hardware
Pamela I. Huffman, Employee Mileage
Hundley Company, Inc., Electric Supplies & Motor
City of Huntington Beach, Water
Industrial Wate~ Conditioning, Laboratory Water
Inland Nut & Bolt Co., Hardware
International Business Machines, Office Supplies
International Harvester Co., Truck Parts
Kar Products, Inc., Hardware
Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies
Kelco Sales & Engineering Co., Hardware
King Bearing, Inc., Couplings, V-Belts & Bearings
Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts
Kleen Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies
Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware & Hose
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tools & Hardware
L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Rental
Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Brushes
Larry~s Bldg. Materials, Inc~, Building Materials
Judy Lee, Employee Mileage
A.J. Lynch & Co., Freight
R.W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., Paving Materials
John Herbert McCullough, Employee Mileage
McMaster-Carr Supply Company, Engine Parts
Marine Biological Consultants, Ecological Research
(MO 8-12-72)
Matheson Scientific, Lab Supplies
Moore Products Co., Electric Supplies
National Lumber & Supply, Inc., Building Mate1'1ials
Nelson-Dunn, Inc., Regulators
C1ty of Newport Beach, Water
Newport Stationers, Office Supplies
C. Arthur Nisson, Retainer & Legal Services
Noland Paper Company, Inc., Reproduction Supplies
M.C. Nottingham Co., Sewer Lateral Repair
Occidental College, Ecology Trawls
Orange County Blueprint Co., Reproduction
Orange County Radiotelephone
Orange County Stamp Co., Rubber Stamps
Orange Valve & Fitting Cop, Pipe Supplies
Osterbauer Compressor Service, Compressor Parts
Pacific Pumping Co., Pump Parts
Pacific Telephone
Ronald Parker, Employee Mileage
Norman Parsons, Employee Mileage
M.C. Patten & Co., Inc., Gauges
Pence Pharmacy, Ecological Research Supplies
Postmaster, Postage
Lee Potter Company, Inc., Maintenance Supplies
Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage
The Regents of the University of Calif., EIS Conference
San Valle Tile Kilns, Building Materials
Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Rewind & Repair
Santa Ana Electronics Co., Electric Supplies
Santa Ana Tent & Awning Co., Hardware
Scientific Products, Lab Supplies
City or Seal Beach, Water
S.F. Serrantino, Employee Mileage
A-2
AMOUNT
137.88
56 .08
7.60
33.80
51~76
1,870.38
13.05
124.70
7.42
40 .O·J
309.97
68.44
81.97
138.26
1,048.56
106 .65
184 .. 98
623.58
319.32
371 .. 20
753.50
1,586.76
116.14
26.78
19.95
11.40
283.50
83.46
16 .52
559.64
1,206.99
52.59
90.40
!~74 .68
17. 21+
295.32
950.00
c::. c::.9 ../ . ./
125.00
375.00
21.53
74.19
19.92
157 .41
82.69
610.14
390.87
20.40
12.60
97.61
18.54
350.00
277.54
52.74
40.00
78.75
165.97
1,330c86
89.09
67.20
96 .. 31
26.23
21 .. 00
WARRANT NO.
19348
19349
19350
19351
19352
19353
1 9354
~355
19356
19357
19358
19359
19360
19361
19362
19363
19361~
19365
19366
19367
19368
19369
19370
19371
19372
19373
19374
19375
19376
19377
19378
19379
19380
19381
19382
19383
19384
19385
19386
19387
19388
19389
19390
19391
19392
19393
19394
19395
....,,9396
19397
19398
19399
19400
19401
19Ll.02
19403
19404
IN FAVOR OF
Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies
So Cal Sign Co., Signs
South Orange Supply, Pipe Supplies
Southern Calif. Edison
Southern Calif. Gas Co.
Southern Calif. Water Co.
Sparkletts, Bottled Water
Speed-E Auto Parts, Truck Parts
$
Standard Oil Co. of Calif., Fuel, Oil, Thinner & Gasoline
John W. Stang Corp., Equip. Rental & Pump (MO 6-14-72)
Starow Steel, Steel
Stewart-Warner Alemite Sales Co., Tools
T & H Equipment Company, Inc., Tractor Parts
Technical Book Co., Training Manuals
39 Stake & Building Supplies, Building Materials
Thomas Bros. Maps, Atlas
Margo Thomson, Employee Mileage
Tinker & Rasor, Equipment Repair
Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Steel
Harry L. Twining, Employee Mileage
Two Guys Departm.en.t Store, Hardware
AMOUNT
412. 56
141075
135-94
10,040.31
1,634.12
3.78
96.31
579.68
1,731.58
5,203.87
720.80
24.22
43.63
17.01
110.53
51.04
10.80
16.00
225 .85
30090
56 052
551. 5r(
25.39
92.58
64.67
26.00
216.30
20.00
445.67
76.90
1,104.61
596.00
52.02
74.00
840.00
171.99
355.83
U.S. Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts
Union Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline
Utilities Supply Co., Hardware & Tools
Vaniman Camera, Photo Supplies & Processing
Wallace Trade Bindery Co., Office Supplies
John Waples, R.S., Odor Consultant
Water Pollution Control Federation, WPCF Conf. (MO 12-13-72)
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc., Engine Parts
Robert A. ·Webber, CWPCA Workshop Expense ·
Wilson Engine & Equipment Co., Filters & Engine Parts
World Travel Bureau, Inc .. , AMSA"& FWPC.A Mtg. Travel Exp.
Donald James Wright, Employee Mileage
James Wybenga, CWPCA Workshop Expense
Xerox, Reproduction Equipment Charge
Zodiac Paper Co., Printing Supplies
Fred A. Harper, Various Mtg & COD Expense
Hanson, Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester, .Audit Services
City of Placentia, Reimbursement for AM.SA Ocean Dlsposal
Meeting (MO 9-13-72)
TOT.AL JOINT OPERATING
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Ace Automotive Equipment Co., Automotive Equipment
Carollo & Keith, Survey I-8
3,390.40
182.25
69,487.92
236.25
1,680.00
65,943.,70 John Carollo Engineers, Englneering-Plant Constr.
Daily Pilot, Bid Notice .A-064, .A-065, A-066, E-066,
E.T.I. & Kordicl\:, Contractor I-8-3 & P2-ll-l
Eastman, Inc., Office Equipment
A-063 22.60
James E. Hoagland & Hoagland Engr. Co., Contr. Pl-9-1
R.C. Hoffman Co., Samplers E~064 (MO 9-13-72)
Hopper Service Parts Co., Tools
Kordick & Rados, Contractor I-8
Motorola, Inc., Conununication Equipment
Newport Stationers, Office Equipment
County of Orange, Compaction Tent I-8
Osborne Laboratorien, IncR, Pipe Test I-8-3
Sparkletts, Water Containers
Sun Electric Corp., Test Equipment
Twining I:iboratoraies, Testing P2-}.J -1 & I-8-3
Utilities Supply Company, ToolR
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTL;Y REVOLVING
TO'rAL JOINT OPERATIHG & CORF
A-3
$
$
148,521.08
1,058.79
6,723.00
8,080.80
384.05
69,211.93
1,381.35
310.80
82.90
325.00
lll~ .. 45
1,209.60
77.80
276.15
... .__ --
~,r7;:::. J 'JB , 7 J --·, ~-• -"· ' --------·------·-·-
DISTRICT NO. 2
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
19405 Lowry and Associates, Engr. Serv., Annex. Fees & Conn.
Fees Policy $ 500.00
19406
19407
19L~o8
19409
19410
19411
191+12
19413
19414
19415
19416
19417
19418
19419
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Lowry and Associates, Engr. & Survey, 2-14-1 & 2-14-2,
Printing Project Report 2-14-2
Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Pipe Testing 2-14-1
Sully Miller Contracting Co., Contractor 2-14-1
DISTRICT NO. 3
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Engineering & Survey, 3-17 & 3-18
Freedom Newspapers, Inc., Bid Notice 3-17-1
State of Calif., Div. of Highways, Road Repair 3-16
DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11
SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Survey 3-17
County of Orange, Compaction Test 3-17
Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Pipe Testing 3-17
J. F. Shea Co., Inc., Contractor 3-17
DISTRICT NO. 5
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
City of Newport Beach, Connection Fee Collection
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Newport Pools, Connection Permit Refund
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6
SUSPENSE FUND WARRAN':CS
IN FA\TOR OF
Osborne La~oratories, Inc., Pipe Testi~g 5-19
A0 G~ Tutor Co.,Inc., & N. M. Saliba Co., Contr. 5-19
·-·B-
$ 24,773.62
1,975.00
98,521.20
$ 125,269.82
$ 125,769.82
$
15,514.25
78.75
203.59
15,796.50
$ 352.50
201.18
2,250.00
200,329.20
$ 203,132.88
$ 2,566.12
$ 77.50
$ 2,643.62
$ 2,'.:60.00
107,774.55
110,724.55
!
DISTRICT NO. 7
WARRANT NO.
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
19420
19421
19422
1~23
19424
19425
19426
19427
19428
Boyle Engineering, Engr. Service & Printing A.Do#9
C. Arthur Nisson & Jack J. Rimel, Legal Serv., A.D,#9
Ivan Swanger, Orange County Treasurer, A.D.#9 Bond
State of
State of
State of
Wellputt
California, Board of Equalization, Annex.
Processing Fee
California, Board of Equalization, Annex.
Processing Fee
California, Board of Equalization_, Annex.
Processing Fee
& Okazaki, Road Repair
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Bo-Mar Construction Company, Contractor 7-5-lR
Boyle Engineering, Survey 7-5-lR & 7-2C-2 & 7-2D-6
-C-
#26
#30
#27
AMOUNT
1,316.70
348.44
360.00
36.00
41.50
90.28
562.00
$ 2,754.92
$ 53,967.60
2,526.00
$ 56,493.60
$ 59,248.52
T
cou:ay S:\::rL\Tlc: DIST!~ICTS o:,-.: O?~.\::cr. ccu~:TY
P. 0. Eox SJ.27 -lOo·t·~ Ellis ,\venue
l;ountain Valley, Caliiornia gz7os
KORDICK & RADC:S: ~'\. Jo5 nt Vent1u:n
JOB: ____ ~~~~I~t~~T~E~R~P~L~A~N~T--=I~N~F~l~iu~JE~l1~JT=-=I~T~-J~~L·E~iR~C~E~P~T~O~~R~,~J~O~B:-k..N~O~,~r~-~8~~~~~~--~~~~---
Amount of this Ch~ngc Order (ADD) J{J'.1I:JlXH}'.1~X $8,682.17
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the
;.: o nYr a c t an cl Io r contra c t ,,.. or k a r c her c b )' au t. ho r i z c c.1 an U. a s co r:1pc1, s a t i o :a
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are
hereby approved. . ..
References: Unit prices for unanticipated work, contractor's invoices to the
Districts dated July 25, 1972 and November 21, 1972
ADD
The Contractor was directed to place additional bedding
material due to deep layers of peat from Station 199+95±
to Station 208+45±. The peat in this area reached a
. depth of as much as 7-feet below the pipe making a total
of 839 cubic yards additional bedding at a unit cost bid.
price of $7.50/cu.yd.
;
The Contractor was directed to construct a 48-itich ID
manhole behind the curb and fence of the Districts'
Plant No. 1 property on Ellis Avenue, and 40-feet of
8-inch VCP sewer from the manhole at Station 247+14~.
This work is to faci~itate the connection of· the plan-
ned Districts' facilities to the sewer.
ADD $6,292.50
ADD ·2, 005. 39
The Contractor was directed to remove a large block of
concrete found at Station 196+30± which was encountered
in the tunneling operation at the Fountain Valley Channel.
Board authorizQtion date: .
'ecember 13, 1972
~·
CAROLLO & KEITH
Agenda Item #13(a)
ADD 384.28
TO+AL ADD $8,682.17
Original Contract Price $ 6,387.511 .00
Prev •. Au th. Changes $ __ 7"-8~, 6;::...a..._,O~. 8~.4~--
CO' s 2, 3, 4 & 5
This Change (ADD) X12XJ2}11';;~ $ __ _;8::....;·~6...;:;;8~2:...;...-=1 .... 7_· __
A~cndc<l Contract Price
-D-
Approved:
cou:~TY SA~~ITXfim~ DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By ______ __,.~~~~-------~-....-----DepITty Chic r .r.:.ns: inc(::
KORDICK & RJ:..DOS, A Joint Venture
All Districts
T
TO:
FROM:
C L A I M F 0 R DAMAGES
Sanitation Districts of Fountain Valley
Mr. and Mrs. Henry Gomez
10448 Crane Circle
Fountain Valley, California
Relating to incident on date of September 28, 1972 at 11:00 PM.
1969 Pontiac completely totalled out by water submerging on
Ellis and Los Flores.
I submit my claim for damages to my car, work, etc., ect.
1969 Pontiac
Tow Service
Storage (fluctuating figure)
Goodyear
Damage to Boots
One Sweater
Shirt
One pair of trousers
Loss· of work
Rental of car necessary
for two job transportation
@ $55.00/week (present
total of 8 weeks) (fluctuating figure)
Police Report No. DR72-4717.
Including any other expenses incurred.
November 22, 1972
$2,200.00
60.00
60.00
164.91
55.00
15.00
12.00
24.95
25.50
440.00
Agenda Item #13(b) -E-All Districts
r
./ ~-lcY~)
f:_CU ~l)
, ..
CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY
CALIFORNIA 92708
CITY HALL (714) 962-2424
November 16, 1972
Orange County Sanitation District
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attn: Mr. Bruce Witcher
Gentlemen:
Attached is a copy of an invoice submitted to Kordick & Rados for
damages caused by the water line break that occurred at Ellis Avenue
and Las Flores Street. We have been contacted by their insurance
company representative, who states that they were not fully insured
for construction failures. The exact amount that they have agreed
to pay has not been determined at this time.
We request, before final payment is made to Kordick & Rados, that
the amount of $2,010.14 be retained from the final payment until
the claim from the City is settled.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY
1Jt?,i;1--~ J_/),;-h-i,'vv_
WayT)~ S. Osborne
Director of Public Works
WSO:ps
Enclosure
......... ,._-..
. ~~-
."
·1 ,
AgeBda Item #13(b) F-1 All Districts
( INVOICE ( c:.., i:" ('\
INV. NO. ..J I v U
CITY Ot-1-0UNTP..JN VALLE'f
TO:
._ ... :
' ...... #
' ... -. -· .. .
r~rrlick & r\.:!d.oo
~.
10200 SLATER AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
TE LE PHONE 952-2424
8BCO !!..~d.lton /,"'.re!!ue
!fan.i:.bgtcn E~ch,. C<llifoi:ni~ 92646
' ~ "": -.... : . . . ·,
DATE 0-~toher 16, 1972
PLEASE REFER TO INVOICE NUMBER
IN ALL COMMUNICATIONS.
:._.~ .•.• ·._.·-THIS INVOICE 15 DUE AND PAYABL_E ON PRES?-NTATION -NO STATEMENT WILL BE SENT
ITEM ... -~ : .. ___ : ______ -· .•.. D f': _s ~ R I PT I 0 -~----·-·· ·--· -·· .. -· . ., ·---··· --··•·• ·--·. _.
. ·1
Call-out of City forces due to "tmtcr t:'k?in break at cite·-
of ~C"".7er lino co--uSttuction in Ellis J~vcnu~ th~ night
of 9/29 /72: ~ · -~---~----:; ·· --··-~--···-'"-·--·· -·· · ..
9/29 Shut r..3in <lown· tu1d cloae road···
9/30
Labor
_E<f\lipn~
t::ihor
. .Etr'1iJmen t
'~te:dttl~
· 10/1/-Repeir ~tors '1aich uere stuck due
to snnd entering lines ~;:or-~ br~k .. Labor
Equipoent
10/2
.....
ROpair ad.di tional t:.eters Libt>c
~r-~ent
---.. :---;· . -
----· -~ ---·-·-··-· Suh-tot:ll. ·
Plus 15% O.lL
··-......
Pli:s ~n1te.r ·lost c!_:e to
br~ (3.294/\gallcns)
~AKE REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY AND ENCLOSE THIS STUB
MARK ATTENTION OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT
CITY OF ,FOUNTAIN VALLEY
! ·:. " . ' ., . · .•
10.?00!SLATER AVENUE .. •
FOUNT.AIN VALLEY, CALIF.
FORM F-2:!15
, ~ r.
DEPARn .. f~NT
Age~da Item #13(b) F-2
A/C CREDITED A.MOUNT .
$ .. · 93.13
/~1r.70
362.13
380~CO
155.75
72 .. 50
15 .. 00
27.CO
12 .. CQ.
~l,167.21
175.03
__£57.35_
$2 .. 010 .. 1{:.
HT./vr
INVOICE NO. 5 7 5 0
AMOUNT ~ ___ 2_,_0_1_0_. _1_4_
!~633-405-19~
CREDIT A/C _______ _
All Districts
RESOLUTION NO. 72-161
AWARDING PURCHASE CONTRACT FOR SUPPLYING
CHLORINE IN ONE TON CYLINDERS, SPECIFICATION
NO. C-005
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AWARDING PURCHASE CONTRACT FOR SUPPLYING
CHLORINE. IN ONE TON CYLINDERS, SPECIFICATION
NO. C-005
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recormnendation this day submitted
to the Boards of Directors by the Director of Operations & Laboratories
that award of purchase contract be made to Georgia-Pacific
Corporation for SUPPLYING CHLORINE IN ONE TON CYLINDERS, SPECIFICATION
NO. C-005, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said
work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That said contract for Specification No. C-005
be awarded to Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Supplier, in the amount of
$112.70 unit price per ton, furnished and delivered, in accordance
with the terms and conditions of said specification; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of County
Sanitation District No. 1, are hereby authorized and directed to
enter into and sign a purchase contract with said supplier to supply
chlorine pursuant to the specifications and purchase contract
documents therefor; and,
Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are
hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful
bidders.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 13, 1972.
Agenda Item #13(d) G-1 All Districts
B I D TABULATION
SHEET
Date DECEMBER 6 , 197 2
ll:CO A.M.
Contract For: SUPPLYING CHLORINE IN ONE TON CYCLINDERS
SPECIFICATION NO. C-005
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
8.
CONTRACTOR
Georgia-Pacific Corporation
City of Commerce, California
Jones Chemicals, Inc.
Torrance, California
Continental Chemical Company
Sacramento, California
Stauffer Chemical Company
Los Angeles, California
PPG Industries, Inc.
Whittier, California
TOTAL BID PER TON
$112.70
116.99
119.95
No Bid
No Bid
It is recommended that award be made to Georgia-Pacific Corporation,
Chemical Packaging Division, 2425 Malt Avenue, City of Commerce,
California, the lowest and best~
Ted A. Dunn
Director of Operations
and Laboratories
Agenda Item #13(d) G-2 All Districts
B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N
SHEET
Date DECEMBER 6' 1972
11:00 A.M.
Contract For: ONE ( 1) ENGINE ANALYZING EQUIPMENT UNIT
DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR ENGINE DIAGNOSIS
1.
2.
4.
SPECIFICATION NO. E-066
CONTRACTOR
Sun Electric Corporation
Maywood, California
Sun Electric Corporation
San Leandro, California
Sun Electric Corporation
Chicago, Illinois
TOTAL BID
$4,326.00
4,326.00
4,326.00
The engine analyzing equipment described in Specification No.
E-066 is for use in the Districts' shop on all automotive engines
and is necessary to meet the California state requirements on exhaust
emissions. The unit is in common use in most dealerships and garages
in Southern California and is accepted as meeting the requirements listed
in Section 618a, Article 4, Title 13, oT the California Administrative
Code. In preparing the specificatio~ other units manufactured by
Marquette, Auto Scan, Allen, and Sun Electric were investigated. Our
evaluation concluded that the equipment available through Marquette,
Auto Scan and Allen were not comparable to Sun Electric for the
following reasons: (1) Units are not individually circuit protected
(2) components are interdependent, which means all must function or
none at all (3) exhaust emission test units which are a critical part
of the tune-up procedure are a separate add-on type or listed as
accessories and not a part of the total system, making it difficult
to correlate with other test functions.
It is therefore recommended that the award be made to the local
bidder, Sun Electric Corporation, 5255 Atlantic Boulevard, Maywood,
California.
'l;(.'1.~
Maintenance Superintendent
Agenda Item #13(e) -H-All Districts
B I D TABULATION
SHEET
Date DECEMBER 6, iq72
11:00 A.M.
Contract For: SIX (6) 4-WHEEL ELECTRIC CARS
SPECIFICATION NO. A-063
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
8.
CONTRACTOR
Taylor-Dunn Mfg. Company
Anaheim, California
Dutch Stark Company
Reseda, California
Otis Material Handling
Anaheim, California
Westinghouse Electric Corporation
Redlands, California
TOTAL BID
$ 9,032.63
9,166.50
10,067.40
10,426.50
It is recommended that award be made to Taylor-Dunn Mfg. Company,
2114 West Ball Road, Anaheim, California, the lowest and best
bidder.
v)/?2 e~/(.1(2
W. N. Clarke
Maintenance Superintendent
Agenda Item #13(e) -I-All Dlstricts
BID TABULATION
SHEET
Date DECEMBER 6, 1 g72
11:00 A.M.
Contract For: ONE (l) ·1/2-TON PICKUP TRUCK
SfECIFICATION NO. A-064
l.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
CONTRACTOR
International Harvester CoCTpany
Anaheim, California
Santa Ana Dodge Inc.
Santa Ana, California
McCoy Ford
Ana~eim, California
Peck Road Ford Truck Sales
Whittier, California
TOTAL BID
$2,940.00
3,003.00
3,008.25
3,349.11
It is recommended that award be made to International Harvester
Company, 1110 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California, the
lowest and best bidder.
vJ/ fJ1 (?~~r~--c
W. N. Clarke
Maintenance SuperintendP.nt
Age~da Item #13(e) -J-All Districts
B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N
S H E E T
Date: December 6, 1972
11:00 A.M.
~ntract For: THREE (3) 1-TON FLAT BED TRUCKS
SPECIFICATION NO. A-065
1.
2.
3.
4.
BIDDER
Santa Ana Dodge Inc.
Santa Ana, California
International Harvester
Anaheim, California
McCoy Ford
Anaheim, California
Peck Road Ford Truck Sales
Whittier, California
TOTAL BID
$11,299.05
11,434.50
11,405.22
12,445.52
LESS
TRADE-IN*
$800.00
900.00
-0-
400.00
NET BID
$10,499.05
10,534.50
11,405.22
12,045.52
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
It is rec6mmended that award be made to Santa Ana Dodge Inc.,
1401 North Tustin, Santa Ana, California, the lowest and best
bidder.
'W''!l~
W. N. Clarke
Maintenance Superintendent
* Trade-Ins
V-48
V-66
Agenda Item #13(e) -K-All Districts
B I D
~
T A B U L A T I D N
S H E E T
Date: December 6, 1972
11:00 A.M.
Contract For: FOUR (4) 1-TON CAB & CHASSIS
SPECIFICATION NO. A-066
1.
2.
3.
4 .
BIDDER
International Harvester
Anaheim, California
Santa Ana Dodge Inc.
Santa Ana, California
McCoy Ford
Anaheim, California
Peck Road Ford Truck Sales
Whittier, Califo:t;>nia
TOTAL BID
$13,230.00
13,440.00
13,426.68
15,057.92
LESS
TRADE-IN*
$1,200.00
1,000.00
-0-
400.00
NET BID
$12,030.00
12,440.00
13,426.68
14,657.92
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
It is recommended that award be made to International Harvester
Company, 1110 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California, the
lowest and best bidder.
IJ,/'(I, ~
W. N. Clarke
Maintenance Superintendent
* Trade-Ins
V-36
V-37
V-46
V-47
Agenda Item #13(e) -L-Al1 Districts
B I D TABULATION
SHEET
Date DECEMBER 6, 1972
11:00 A.M.
Contract For: ONE ( 1.) 16, 000 lb. GVW TRUCK
WITH ARTICULATED HYDRAULIC CRANE
1.
2.
3.
4.
6.
7.
8.
SPECIFICATION NO. A-067
CONTRACTOR
Santa Ana Dodge Inc.
Santa Ana, California
International Harvester Company
Anaheim, California
McCoy Ford
Anaheim, California
Peck Road Ford Truck Sales
Whittier, .California
TOTAL BID
$10,599 .. 75
10,605.00
10,843.86
11,274.66
It is recommended that award be made to Santa Ana Dodge Inc.,
1401 North Tustin, Santa Ana, California, the lowest and best
bidder.
/}~ n {}le~.,_;__
W. N. Clarke
Maintenance Superintendent
Age~da Item #13(e) -M-All Districts
December 5, 1972
MEMORANDUM
TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. SOX 8!27
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
.FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
FROM: William N. Clarke, Maintenance Superintendent
SUBJECT: Purchase of Engine Parts
Waukesha Motor Company, manufacturers of the V-12, 450 HP digester
gas engines which drive the Districts' headworks pumps has developed
improved cylinder head and manifold assemblies for their engines to
provide increased cooling water circulation, and the use of hardened valve
seats with a larger surface area for heat dissipation. It is estimated that
utilization of these ne~ly designed heads and manifolds would reduce the
frequency of overhaul on the eguipment from once every four months (3,000
running hours) to once every lt3 months (12,000 running hours).
We have negotiated with the local representative, Waukesha Engine
Servicenter, for the.purchase of 24 cylinder· heads and manifold assemblies.
The list price for this equipment is $19,901.29. They have agreed to a
discount of 15%, leaving a net of $16, 916 .10. They will also allm·1 a
trade-in of $9,030.00 for our old heads and manifolds. This leaves a net
difference of $7,886.10.
It is my recommendation that we be authorized to purchase 24 cylinder
heads and manifold assemblies for an amount not to exceed $8,000.00, plus
tax and freight, from Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc., 1783 South Santa
Fe Avenue, Compton, California.
Agenda Item #13(f) -N-All Districts
Engineer's Estimate: $1,200,000.
BID TABULATION
SHEET
Date November 20~ 1972 -11:00 PJ..~
Contract For: DIG ESTERS "N" AND "011 AT PLANT NO. 2
JOB NO. P2-21
CONTRACTOR
1. Hemisphere Constructors, Inc.
Bellflower
2. E.T.I. and Kordick, A Joint Venture
Baldwin Park
3. Jrunes E. Hoagland co.
Long Beach
4. J. Putnam Henck, a corporation and
Henck Pro, a joint venture
San Bernardino
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Agenda Item #20 -0-
TOTAL BID
$1,068,413.
.$1, 090' 000.
. $1, 091, 220.
$1,129_,356.
District 1
RESOLUTION NO. 72-162-1
APPROVING AWARD OF JOB NO. P2-21,
DIGESTERS "N" AND 11 0 11 AT PLANT
NO. 2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AWARD OF DIGESTERS
"N" AND "O" AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-21
*' * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted
to the Board of Directors by John Carollo Engineers, Districts'
engineers, and concurred in by the Deputy Chief Engineer, that award of
·contract be made to Hemisphere Constructors, Inc., for DIGESTERS
"N" AND ".O" AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-21, and the tabulation of
bids and the proposal for said work, are hereby received and ordered
filed; and,
Section 2. That award of contract to Hemisphere Constructors,
Inc., in the total amount of $1,068f413.oo, in accordance with the
terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, be approved; and,
Section 3. That the contract date for said work be established
as December 28, 1972; and,
Section 4. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District
are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract
with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the
specifications and contract documents therefor; and,
Section 5. That all other bids received for said work are hereby
rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful
bidders.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 13, 1972.
Agenda Item #20 -P-District 1
RESOLUTION NO. 72-163-11
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF GRANT OF
EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISON COMPANY
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
GRANT OF EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISON COMPANY
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated
--------~-------
, wherein County Sanitation District No. 11 grants
to Southern California Edison Company a permanent easement to
accomodate street improvements by the City of Huntington Beach in
Newland Avenue; and,
Section 2. That the real property over which said easement
is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A"
and "B" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That in consideration of said Grant of Easement,
Southern California Edison Company shall pay to County Sanitation
District No. 11, the sum of $250.00; and,
Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of
Directors be authorized and directed to execute said Grant of Easement
in form acceptable to the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 13, 1972.
Agenda Item #25 -Q-District 11
RESOLUTION NO. 72-166
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
WITH HOAG HOSPITAL RE PACIFIC COAST
HIGHWAY SEWER
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH HOAG HOSPITAL FOR
OVERSIZING PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY CROSSING
* * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
5 and 6, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain agreement dated
between County Sanitation District No. 5 and Hoag Hospital for
oversizing Pacific Coast Highway crossing in connection with replace-
ment of portions of Newport Beach Trunk A, is hereby approved and
accepted; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 5,
acting for itself and as agent for District No. 6, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 13, 1972.
Agenda Item #30 (a) -R-Districts 5 & 6
Items of joint business from November 8, 1972 meeting Page 1 of 2
November 8th
Agenda Item No.
8
9
12
13
14(a)
14(b)
14(c)
14(d)
15
Agenda Item #35
Item
Consideration of motion to receive and file
Executive Cornmittee!s written report dated
November 1, 1972.
Consideration of motion authorizing the
General Manager to appoint a staff member to
participate on a joint technical advisory
committee with the County Road Department,
. Southern California Edison Company, Southern
Counties Gas Company, San Diego Gas and
Electric Company, Regional Water Quality
Control Board, County Air Pollution Control
District, and the State Air Resources Board,
to study the feasibility of new methods for
disposal of solid wastes, as recommended
by the Executive Committee.
Receive and file October 26th written report
of Special Committee on State Board Ocean
Policy.
Consideration of Resolution No. 72-141,
assuring the State Water Resources Control
Board of a staged improved treatment program,
enforcement of source control of pollutants,
and establishing a timetable therefor.
Consideration of motion to receive and file
Annual Report submitted by Hanson, Peterson,
Cowles and Sylvester, Certified Public
Accountants, for the year ending June 30,
1972, previously mailed to Directors by
auditors
Consideration of motion to receive, file
and deny claim, dated October 2, 1972, in
the amount of $1,250.71 submitted by Southern
California Edison Company in connection with
construction of Interplant Influent Interceptor,
Job No. I-8
Consideration of Resolution No. 72-145-6,
authorizing and directing execution and
filing of documents necessary for Federal
Grants under 33 U.S.C., 466 et seq. and
State Grants under Clean Water Bond Law of
1970, for 1972-73 Joint Works Improvements
and Additions.
Consideration of motion to receive and file
resolutions from the various cities to the
Board of Supervisors requesting the Supervisors
to improve portions of the Santa Ana River to
mitigate the potential inundation of Districts'
Treatment Plants Nos. 1 and 2 in the event
of flooding
Consideration of motion to receive and file
financial report of Director of Finance for
quarter ending September 30, 1972.
S-1 District 6
Items of joint business from November 8, 1972 meeting Page 2 of 2
Nove~nber 8th
Agenda Item No.
16
17
18
19
20
26
Agenda Item #35
Item
Consideration of Resolution No. 72-149,
requesting permission of the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa
Ana Region, to submit a preliminary technical
report as required by the State Water Resources
Control Board's Water Quality control Plan for
the Ocean Waters of California, by January 15,
1973, with submission of final report on or
before January 1, 1974.
Consideration of motion authorizing enlargement
of the scope of the 1972 Master Plan Report and
Preliminary Design Study for future plant
facilities and programs authorized February 9,
1972, to include preparation of a preliminary
technical report to comply with the State
Water Resources Control Board's Water Quality
Control Plan for the Ocean Waters of California;
and authorizing the General Manager to direct
John Carollo Engineers to proceed with the
preparation of said preliminary technical
report in accordance with the terms of ~heir
proposal dated January 18, 1972, on a per diem
fee basis in an additional amount not to
exceed $20,700.00
Consideration of motion authorizing the Joint
Chairman to appoint a Special Committee to
interview prospective engineers for design of
projects listed in Project Report No. 2 for
1972-73 Joint Works Improvements and Additions
Consideration of motion to receive and file
certification of the General Manager that
he has checked all bills appearing on the
agenda, found them to be in order, and that
he recommends authorization for payment
Consideration of roll call vote motion
approving Joint Operating and Capital Outlay
Revolving warrant books for signature of the
Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing
payment of claims.
Consideration of motion approving Districts
5 & 6 suspense fund warrants and authorizing
payment of claims.
S-2 District 6
City of Analw1m
204 East Lincoln Avenue
Anahei~, California 92805
llove~ber 15, 1972
Attention: Hr. l\ei th A. !"~urdoch
City !,i<.:mager
Subject: Proposed Annexation No. 6 -Anaheim Hills
Annexation ~·Io. 1
Enclor,cd hcre~ith please find copic~ of az.ree~ent providin~ for
vaiver of annexation fees for ar2a contained in subject annexation
encompassing the colf course and reservoir and providing th~t in
the event any of the land for which fees have been waived requires
sewer service, that portion to be so developed be required to pny
a char~e equal to tlw th0n applicable District annexation fee n.nd
any other i'ees in effect at that time.
Please have all three copies executed on behalf of the City and
return to the undersigned. One fully executed copy will be returned
by the District.
As you are aware, District No. 2's annexation fees are adjusted
annually on Janua.ry 1st. It ia, therefore, inperative that the
signed agreement be returned to this office prior to Decenber 6th
in order to enable the Doard of Directors to take final action
approving subject annexation at their ret;ular December rneeting ..
JWS:rb
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Thornton E. Piersall
--·· '"-"-·••" .. -.-.. -...J.--... ·-.-_ ............. -~-···'• •···-''"'""" _____ ..... '"'I----.. ~·-·----... .
Ager:da Item #39
J. Wayne Sylvester
Secretary of the Board
of Directo:c's
T-1 District 2
Anaheim Hills, Inc.
380 Anahein Hills Road
Anaheim, California 92806
Novei.1ber 6, 1972
Attention: James Barisic, Vice President
Subject: Azrcement providins for deferred payment of fees
for An3.hcin Hills .l\:mcxation !·7o. 1
On October 18th we forwarded four copies of subject agreement
for execution by Ananeim Hills, Inc.· and Tc~aco Ventures, Inc.
In order that the Board ~ay consid8r final approval of
Annexation :Jo. G -Anahein Hills j1.nnexation Jo. l to the
District, it vill be necessary that ~c have the fully executed
agreei;1ent no later than Dece:nber 7th.
As you }:now, District lio. 2 1 s annexation fees are adjusted
annually on January 1st. It is, therefore, essential that
this matter be completed by the December 13th meeting of the
Board of Directors.
JWS:rb
Agel)da Item #39
J. Wayne Sylvester
Director of Finance
T-2 District 2
CLARK MILLER
C. ARThUR NISSON
NE:LSON KOGLER
H. LAWSON MEAD
MILLER, NISSON S KOGLER
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
2014 NORTH BROADWAY
SANTA ANA, CALIFOR.N It\ 92706
December 4, 1972
Fred Harper, General Manager
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
Post Off ice Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Dear Fred:
Re: Right of Way Acquisition for
County Sanitation District No. 2
re 2-14
In· order to negotiate and acquire the right of
way required in this Contract, it will be necessary to
employ an appraiser to assist.
I am requesting that you ask the Board to
authorize the employment of Everett s. Schmid, whose
office is at 1617 East 17th Street, Suite 18, Santa Ana,
California 92701. His telephone number is 558-1855.
Everett is not an MF~I appraiser, however, he
has been appraising property for attorneys and banks. He
TELEPHONE
AREA CODE 714
542-6771
has also worked with Cedric W'hi te, who is an .MAI appraiser,
in the matter of preparation and work-up of information. I
believe he is sufficiently qualified as an appraiser to serve
our purposes and in the event that we are unable to negotiate
settlement in the acquisition of the right of way, he can
probably be used as a witness in Court. It may be that we
will want to have an MAI in the event of a hotly contested
court case, however, until we reach that point I believe our
purposes will best be served by employing Mr. Schmid.
The agreement that he is willing to make is to work
for the Districts doing appraisal work as directed by me or
the staff at the rate of $15.00 per hour. I am requesting you
present this to the Board with a recommendation.
CAN:ac
Ae;enda Item #40
Yours very truly,
/" ,,,.... ~ .......
(,,,.) _,, ) --/<:'0~--« .~ ·~~L_
C. Arthur Nissan
General Counsel
-U-District 2
P. 0. l~o x 0· 127 - 1 G ;~ -~ ·t E 11 is .:\ v c nu c
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Cl IAI~GE O!Wl:R
cc o. ;rn. 2 --------·----------SULLY -MILLER CONrrHACTING COI-'IPANY DATE Dece'.:lber 13, 1972
Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, From Reclamation Plant £Jo. 1
J 0 B: ----~t~o__.;;;.;K:;.;..a_...t;..,.;:;e~;;;;l:;.;;;;l;;:_;;a;.__,;:A..;;... ,.;....,e:;.;n;.;:.-1.;.;,.~-p.;;;..~ ...._, ~C..:::.o~n;...;:t.=..r...:;;;e.:_:c::;.-::t:..__::;,1'.;.;:'. o::...:•:_:;2;;;..,---1;::..l..!..+---1=-----------------
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 0.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the
co,_.,ra~ ~ ~:-~d/ or contract ,~·or k arc her c by author~-z e;J . and as cor;-ipensa l.. ion
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are
hereby approved. . ..
REFERENCE: Contractor's letter to the District dated
November 2, 1972
The Contractor shall install 78-inch diameter RCP in-
stead of 72-inch diameter RCP specified for in the
subject contract. Any additional expense for this
change will be borne by the contractor and there will
be no additional charge to ·the District. No additional
time extension shall be granted for this Change Order.
Original Contract Price
Prev •. Auth. Ch~mges
$ 6 _, 27 4 _, 608. LW
$ 1, l-1-01, 504 .14
This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) $
---~~~~~~~-
0.00
Board authorization date:
December 13, 1972
Contractor
Lowry & Associates
Agertda Item #41
Amended Contract Price s 7' 676_,112. 54
-V-
Approved:
GOU !\TY SA~n 'L\ TI()~~ n I STRICT s 0 [
Orange County, California
District 2
RESOLUTION NO. 72-111-7
ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO
THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 26)
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, TRACT NO. 4733 ANNEXATION
* ·* * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to
County Sanitation District No. 7 for annexation of territory to
the District by means of a petition filed by the majority property
owners; and,
Section 2. That, pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganiza-
tion Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of
California, application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency
Formation Commission for annexation of said territory to County
Sanitation District No. 7 by means of Resolution No. 71-148-7, filed
with said Conunission by the District; and,
Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission
to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Tract No. 4733 Annexation
to County Sanitation District No. 7 (Annexation No. 26)", the exterior
boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit
"B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution;
and,
Section 4. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is
uninhabited; and,
Section 5. That the reason for annexing said territory is to
obtain and provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory;
and,
Section 6. That provision for payment of annexation fees in
the amount of $4,169.70 has been satisfied; and,
Agenda Item #45 W-1 District 7
• r
Section 7. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local
Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District
Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code,
Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described
hereinabove, be and it is hereby ordered annexed to County
Sanitation District No. 7 without notice or hearing and without
election.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 13, 1972.
Agenda Item #45 W-2 District 7
H. LAWSON MEAD
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2014 NORTH BROADWAY
BANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706
542-6771
November 13, 1972
Board of Directors, County Sanitation Districts
County Sanitation District #7
10844 Ellis Avenue
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, Califo~nia 92708
Re: Proposed Annexation No. 27 (Mead)
to County Sanitation District #7
Gentlemen:
On behalf of Frank F. Mead, Nan M. Curran and Lolita
Mahoney, who ·are the owners of approximately 120 acres which
is the subject of the above-referenced annexation, I hereby
request that your Board take final action to complete the
annexation of this property to Sanitation District #7.
As previously arranged, my clients have executed a
note, secured by a deed of trust on their property, for payment
of the annexation fees. This note will bear interest payable
semi-annually, and the principal amount will be due in five years
from the date of annexation or upon sale of any portion of the
property, whichever event occurs first.
It would be appreciated if final action could be taken
before the end of this calendar year so as to save the property_
owners the anticipated 1973 increase in the annexation fees.
Very truly yours,
~. ~ ~m" '\V~~Q-.........
H. Lawson Mead
HLM:cp
Agenda Item #46 -X·-District 7 I
. (
RESOLUTION NO. 72-51-7
ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
TO THE DIS TRI Cl1
( i!iEAD ANNEXATION -
ANNEXATION NO. 27 1rO COUNTY SANITATION
DIS11RICT NO. 7)
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, OBnERING
ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT
(MEAD' ANNEXATION -ANNEXATION NO. 27 TO
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7)
* * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of .Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That, pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization
Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of
California, application has heretofore been made to the Local
Agenc·y F.onnation Commission for annexation of said territory
to County Sanitation District No. 7, by means of a petition filed
with said Commission by the property owners of the area to be annexed;
and,
Section 2. That the territory to be annexed in uninhabited;
and,
Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission to
the territory proposed: to be annexed is Annexation No. 27 (Mead)
to County Sanitation District No. 7, the exterior boundaries of which
are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exh.lbit "B", attached hereto
and by reference made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 4. That the reason for annexing said territory is
to obtain and provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory;.
and,
Section 5. That provisions for annexation fees in the amount
of $44,486.64 have been satisfied by execution of a Straight Interest
Bea.ring Note, payable within 5 years from date of approval of said
a11nexation, secured by a Deed of Trust with Assignment of Rents, in
a. form approved by the District's General Counsel; and,
Agenda Item #46 Y-1 District 7
. '
Section 6. That,· as authorized by resolution of the Local
Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division l(District
Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code,
Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and
described hereinabove, be and it is hereby ordered annexed to
County Sanitation District No. 7 without notice or hearing
and without election.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 13, 1972.
Agenda Item #116 Y-2 District 7
... '.
RESOLUTION NO. 72-165-7
ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE
DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 30 -TRACT 6232)
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF
TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 30 -
TRACT NO. 6232 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
NO. 7)
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to
County Sanitation District No. 7 for annexation of territory to
the District by means of a petition filed by the property owner;
and,
Section 2. That, pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganiza-
tion Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of
California, application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency
Formation Commission for annexation of said territory to County
Sanitation District No. 7 by means of Resolution No. 72-97-7, filed
with said Commission by the District; and,
Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission
to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Tract No. 6232 Annexation
to County Sanitation District No. 7 (Annexation No. 30)," the exterior
boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit
"B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution;
and,
Section 4. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is
uninhabited; and,
Section 5. That the reason for annexing said territory is to
~· obtain and provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory;
and,
Section 6. That provision for payment of annexation fees in
the amount of $8,210.65 has been satisfied; and,
Agenda Item #47 Z-1 District 7
Section 7. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local
Agency Formation CorrJnission pursuant to Division 1 (District
Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code,
Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described
hereinabove, be and it is hereby ordered annexed to County Sanitation
Dist~ict No. 7 without notice or hearing and without election.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 13, 1972.
Agenda Item #47 Z-2 District 7
• r" e
Maridayle Thorapson Peay
Exccut~ix of the Estate of
l·~uj:··io;1 !..::. j-on'.)~, ,;_,ccca:.;cd
1925~} C.::1ap;-::.o.n .i-'~v~nu~
Cl'a~·.:L;c, C:i.lii'o1·ni:J.
November 7, 1972
On Jltly :17, l:J 7 2, i;t..: adv:!. ::;2 c1 f ou t~1.J.t tt.c Lo.:;[J.l A~~Ui~Y ~o:-·na t ion
Co:.~:,is0ior, lnd. D.p~.n-·ovcc:. ::a;.J~i set ~-~1lLu~1.::.tion :.u.-~ .... t ini'o::·::-.e:d :/ou of
tht.-J.\.;03 tl1.;;lt ~·;ere c!~e bt::i'or:..: t'l1L . .:.l u.;i_)rov~11 ·c:,r Di.strict Jo. 7
could t~~:e pl::t.C•J.
'lo C.:ut~, :·re 11::.vc not h~:1rd. fro'1 :!ou cor:t;l'.7·1,nin:-= this ;;:(~tter. As
you G.re :i:mre, Vif.;t;rict :;o. 7' !3 ar..u~~;:c:J.·i;ion £\!CD 3.X>t~ adj u~t~d
nunu2lly on t.T<.lnuo.r~' l~~i-;. lblcss feG.3 arc tcn;..-:.9rcd. prior to that
t1ate, the rw,·1 sciledulc '1d.ll &r.;ply to 3aid. anr,.c:rn.tion.
JWS:rb
cc: Evans & Associates, Inc.
Agenda Item #48
J. Wayne Sylvester
Secretary of t:·w i3oard
of Dir·~cto:..,...s
-AA-District 7
,. ' .-.
COUNTY SAN I TAT I or~ DISTRICT NO. 3
of Orange County, California
ADDEtWUM NO. 1
to
CONSTRUCT I or·J SPECIF I CAT I Ot~S AND PLANS
for
BOLSA RELIEF TRUtJK SE\./ER, REACH 10
CONTRACT NO. 3-17-1
and
BOLSA AVENUE STORM DRAIN
DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS
Revise Section 112-2 to read as follows:
11 112-2 REllJFORCED Cat/CRETE PIPE
All m~tcrials used in and the manufacture of reinforced concrete pipe
shall. conform to the provisions of Standard Specifications for Reinforced
Concrete Culvert, Storm Drain, and Sewer Pipe, ASTM Designation: C76.
The Contractor shall furnish and install reinforced concrete pipe of
diameters and D-load classifications as indicated on the plons.11
CH: l db
11-28-72
BC03-110-50
Con rad Hohene r, Jr. ; C. E. '" l 0951
Agenda Item #52 -BB-District 3
,
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF TI-TR REGULAR
·JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange
County, Ca.llfurnia, 1t1ias held at the hour of ? : 30 p .m.,
December 13 , 1972 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain
Valley, California.
The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called
the meeting to order at 7:30 p.rn.
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum
present for each District's Board.
* * * * * * * * *
DISTRICT 2
Adjournment
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned
to 7:30 p.m., December 20, 1972. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 10:26 p.m., December 13, 1972.
STATE OF CALIFORNIAl
SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE
I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the
Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full,
true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of
said Boards of Directors on the 13th day of December
19 72 '
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this
13th day of December, 1972.
&nd
S-107
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
.JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIFECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORIUA
A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange
County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m.,
December 13, , 1972 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain
Valley, California.
The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called
the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum
present for each District 1 s Board.
DISTRICT 7
Adjournment
* * * * * * * * *
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
'Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to
4:30 p.m., January 3, 1973. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 10;42 p.m., December 13, 1972.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA<
COUNTY OF ORANGE ~ SS. • •
I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary ~f each of the
Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, Califo~nia,
do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full,
true and correct copy of minute entri~ on meeting of
said Boards of Directors on the 13th day of December
19 72
13th
S-107
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have
day of December, 1972.
5 6 ' '
'
this
•
• •
•
• --··--~----··-·-·,-·-• ---• .,. -··-."~ ~~ ·-• •• ._.,._ v. •• r -....,....
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF ~IRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11,
OF ORANGE COUNTY~ CALIFORNIA
A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange
County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m.,
December 13 , 1972 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain
Valley, California.
The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called
the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum
present for each District's Board.
* * * * * * * * *
DISTRICT 3
Adjournment
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned
to 7:30 p.m., January 3, 1973. The Chairman then declared
the meeting· so adjourned at 10: 53 p·:m., December 13, 1972 .
STATE OF CALIFORNIA~
SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE
I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the
Boards of Directors of County Sanitat~on Districts Nos.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full,
true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of
said Boards of Directors on the 13th day of December
19 72
13th
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have
day of December, 1972.
,
this
•
e oar s of Di~ectors
tation Districts Nos .
. • -:7 ... -and 11
S-107
.... ~ -.
-...... ____ ..... -
M-E-M-0 -R-A-N-D -U-M
. -----···-··~-·--
TO Jean Mosher DA TE 12/12/72
~~~~~~~~~~~~~--~~·~~-
FROM J. Wa yne Sylvester SUBJECT
~~~~~~~~~~-~~-
Re: December Executive Committee which will be held January 3rd
Renewal of membership in CASA and AMSA
DECEMBER 13, 1972 JOINT MEETING
#6 -Report of the Joint Chairman
Mr. Harper & Mr. Finnell met with Robert Sansom, Assistant Administrator
of EPA in charge of air and water quality, a group of AMSA agencies , and
representatives of larger dischargers on the Atlantic and West Coast , the
last week in November in Washington regarding the definition of secondary
~reatment. While they didn 't turn them around, they did slow them down.
EPA's staff was looking for a single definition of secondary treatment.
It was Finnell's and Harper's impression that Sansom, who is an economist
type, was receptive to looking at alternative means once he found out
that the agencies had that kind of flexibility. Towards the end of the
meeting he directed the staff to at least look at alternatives but did
not make any commitments to any of the agencies there. Commissioner
from New York City agreed with reasoning .of Pacific Coast agencies and
said that he felt that what they were dumping into the Hudson had no
resemblance to what we should do on the West Coast. He felt that the
same kind of conditions should not be laid on the Pacific Coast agencies
in view of where we · were discharging.
Also met with Mr. White and ·assistant of Congressman Williams office .
Thought they definitely got idea across that the Di stricts were not
trying to drag their feet but had been a leader in setting higher
pollution standards, but still couldn't see why we had to spend $105
million when same objectives could be met with $40 million. Result of
that discussion was the direction from White to men in charge of budgets ,
etc. to get with Mr. Ruckelshaus and see if there is n 't some way to come
up with alternative definitions of secondary treatment. A feasible
alternative to look at re secondary treatment was idea of categories
depending where recei~ing waters were or effluent was discharged.
Griset asked if they were able to make any use at all out of the SCCWRP
studies and Finnell said that they pointed out to Bob Sansom in trying
to fortify our position that we weren't dragging our feet, that before
there was an EPA, we had gone into this research project and that the
results were just now starting to come in. Left first volume of SCCWRP
report with them. Were backed up by LA City and LA _County on that point .
#7 -Report of the General Manager
' FAH reported that while in Washington he talked to people there regarding
a work shop that was to be in Detroit. Mr. Harper went to meeting in
Detroit on 12/11. One of the AMSA people commented that the Districts
were really on top of things. Talked to two gentlemen re secondary
treatment. What they· proposed to have published in Federal Register
on Friday would require activated sludge and probably car bon towers.
Would rule out trickling filter secondary treatment plants such as what
we have here now. Don't feel this is the intent of Congress, particularly
if they go along with what the President has done on the funding program.
Ruckelshaus announced that letter President was signing to impound
$6 million of federal funds took more than half of the money out of the
program. Discussionsled .~~. Harper to believe that this had been proposed
by their staff so they would get a lot of input from agencies like ourselves .
During formal discussions on panel (about 300 people) it was indicated that
if we would comply with certain things, they would grant a waiver as they
said before. Don't know what more will come out in Federal Register but
.-
-. p. 2
·this is what we have to comment on. Don't know if it will be 10 or 15
days that we have to comment in. Many agencies are being contacted by
telegram to send telegrams asking that this be deferred. Office of
Management and Budgets is looking into this. Just won't fit into 1977
frame they are talking about. Al l of the discusaion waa about various
segments of the Water Pollution Bill. Mr. Harper mentioned that there
was some good news and that was that there is a clause in the bill on
reimbursement which came about through the efforts of AMSA (which we
help fund). This clause picks up projects not funded by federal govern-
ment as far back as 1956. Will pay up to 30% of the funding from 1956-66
if project had state approval. Unfortunately, we did not apply then.
However, on next phase from 1966-72, we only received 33% and now are
eligible to go back and apply for 55% funding. $1.9 billion has been
appropriated to take care of this type of funding. During 1966-72 we
had over $15 million of work that were approved projects. We received
$15 million and are eligible for close to $3.5 million. Will apply
for it within the 12 month period from date Bill was approved (Oct. 18),
as will other people throughout U.S. and $1.9 billion pie will be split
among agencies that have applied. Won't get $3.5 million but maybe half
of it. · Are a lot of ramifications to this Bill that we don't understand
and a lot of the policy hasn't even been established by EPA administrators.
Plan to continue to have these work shops and Mr. Harper indicated our
association would put one on maybe in February in Los Angeles or San
Francisco. Appears that they are taking the state out of the picture,
but they say no. Regarding the permit system, don't know how it will
be administrated and how we will fit into · it. Have to apply by April 15
and' use the long form which hasn't even been printed yet. States will
be advised this next week on their allocations for this year and next year.
Only problem is that it now gets into needs and priorities. In Ca lifornia
$600 million of projects submitted to the State and only $200 million will
be spent. Prob l em is to find out how these projects will be funded and
which ones should be funded.
#8 -Report of the General Counsel
Nisson reported that he had been in contact with· LA City Attorney.
City of LA is being sued on a permit charge, and Deputy City Attorney
in charge of this called Ni ss on and wanted copies of Districts
ordinances which were sent to them and in return City of LA sent
us theirs. Have had good contact with LA County City Attorney and
attorneys of CASA so can communicate easily but never worked with City
of LA before. Thought Directors might be interested in some permit
and sewerage facilities charges of City of LA and read various charges
listed in ordinance. Herrin asked if these were being imposed at this
time and Nissen answered yes, throughout City of LA.
He also reported that he had attended a course put on by UCI on
Ecological Impact Statements . Over 300 people. Principle thing is
procedure aspect rathern than content of these reports. The impact
statements must be prep ared and presented before the project is adopted
and the proponents seeking the permit prepares the facts , and the agency
which gives the permit is .suppose to prepare the stateme nt. This is
the procedure and those that have not followed it are getting kicked
back to start all over . Since that meeting, the legislature has enacted
another amendment and it is a whole new ball gime again but don 't know
what it is yet. Probably still will require the agency that iss ues
the permit to be the one who has to prepare the report but person seeking
it must supply th e facts from which to prepare the stat e me nt.
..
Also reported on suits we are involved in:
Peter Kiewitt suit -request for trial setting has been finalized.
Will be taking deposition depending on when we get a trail date.
Norman Tremblay suit -trial has been held and will be filing a reply
brief sometime between January 2nd and 20th. Suit is between $5,000
and $8,000. Districts are very sympathetic but the law just doesn't
permit us to pay this claim.
p. 3
District 2 will be filing a condemnation action on 11 permanent parcels
and 11 temporary.
District 3 has right-of-way suit pending that Nissen thinks we will be
able to settle.
District 3 vs. Amercoat, Cook & Barletta -won appeal and is back down
for trial in lower court. Will be grinding away during the next year.
#15 -Award of P2-21
Nisson read his letter of recommendation regarding an extension of
the award period. Kymla asked if the low bidder requested this extension
of time and Finnell answered no, that we were concerned over Proposition 20
and requested a recommendation from the General Counsel.
Quigley moved to receive and file the recommendation to have a supplemental
agreement between the low bidder and second low bidder. Motion was
seconded and carried.
#16 -Joint statement re "critical air areas"
FAH reported that SWRCB has been conducting hearings. Had one last
Thursday (12/7) and will have another Jan. 4 to take additional testi-
mony concerning this. What they are considering is changing the grant
regulations for construction grants here in the state that would restrict
the size of the facility to be constructed, through the existing need
plus the projected five-year growth of the area, for any area that is
determined by the Air Resources Board to .be known as a Hcritical air
area". There is some confusion over "critical air areas" because two
different maps were sent out. Came about as a means of adjusting the
funding that was to take place in the state. Not really so much a
concern of the air quality. Received letters from EPA and Air Resources
Board. Statement made by George Taylor, Executive Officer of the State
Resources Board, at meeting in LA ·was that there was no documentary
evidence that this would improve conditions in any area. Question was
asked if this was done by this Board, how much would the air quality
be improved, and he just said it was part of their strategy. There are
are a number of concerns. It would be a method of getting funding moved
to another area of the state. Greatest population is here in Southern
California where we do need the funding and should make sure our projects
are put in. One restriction· t _hey are talk:i"ng about is that the five-year
period would start from date of award of contract. Is kind of a back
door approach trying to get local communities to change their zoning.
We do not see a direct program coming to councils and planning commissions
asking them to change .the zoning. They think if you don't put in the
utilities, this will stop the growth. Not particularly true; example in
District 7. Other po'int is in the event a community wished to expand
the facilities or make them larger than the State would participate in,
would go on a pro rata basis. Would actually penalize that community
because they went ahead with larger facilities.
p. 4
·Had discussions with other entities and felt that the approach of a
unified position paper and maybe offering an alternate method to
accomplish something they felt needed to be accomplished might be
a good method. EPA will pursue this even if State drops it.
Griset moved the adoption of this motion authorizing Districts to enter
into a joint statement with other sewering agencies. Finnell stated
that he would like the Directors to consider one amendment to this
motion. While he felt FAH wou ld look out for the Districts in any
joint agreement, thought a joint statement should only be authorized
after approval by at least the Executive Committee. This was made
into a motion and seconded. Kymla asked if it would be the intent to
call an Executive Committee meeting prior to Jan. 4 to approve this
statement and Finnell answered that it would be mailed to them when
it had been prepared in order for them to review it before Jan. 4th.
Kymla commented re FAH 's report, that SWRCB had requested the respective
agencies to submit recommendations for amendment to the proposed
regulations. As part of this statement he i~ suggested that there also
be suggestions for the amendme~ts. Some of the other agencies have
already drafted some proposed amendments of which Kymla had copies with
him. He stated that on the 19th the other agencies were getting together
with FAH to work out this joint statement and recommendation. Finnell
restated that he didn't think General Manager should be in a position
to approve policies but that majority of Executive Committee should
approve. There was a call for the question and motion was voted on
and carried.
#39 -Annexation No. 6 -Ana~eim Hills
FAH reported that we still did not have the executed agreement back
from one of the proponents. It was moved, seconded and carried to -table
item un til agr eements ~ere received;.
#41 -Change Order to #2-14-1
Finnell questioned whether we were getti~g the difference between the
72" and 78'' pipe for the same money and was answered yes, we were.
Wond ered if this would cause any trouble and Mr . Harper said no, it
would hlep us. (Winn mentioned he wanted to abstain from voting on
this Item)??
#44 -Adjournment
It was mentioned that the communications received were asking us to
hold off until February for adjourned meeting. Mr. Harper suggested
that the Board may wish to hold the hearing as scheduled on the 20th and
declare its intent to continue the hearing to another date. If the
Directors wish to do that, we can notify the different parties involve d.
Castro called for the question . Just stated that he thought the hearing
should be held off until Februrary. Smith stated that he received one
written communication and had several calls from different ones of the
Board that we should continue as scheduled. Said he felt we shou ld
continue with the hearing. Nevil said La Habra didn't feel that there
should be a delay of the hearing but that the hearing on the 20th should
be continued to another day. Finnell stated that his council voted to
have the public hearing as scheduled . Winn asked what the reason was
for continuing and Finnell answered that the Orange County Chamber of
Commerce had requ ested a continuance in order that they can prepare data
to support their protests . Th e question was called for and the motion
was voted on and carried. Culver abstained from voting on motion.
p. 5
.Mr. Harper reported that the Special Committee to Review Compensation
of Department Heads would be meeting sometime in January .
#46 -Annexation No. 27
Miller asked what the problem was on this annexation. Mr . Harper
reported that it was a 120 acre annexation which was proposed many
months ago and we had received a letter asking that the annexation
not be acted upon until action had been taken regarding annexation
to the City of Orange. We have now received a letter to go ahead with
annexation. At present time annexation is not served by a sewer system
however the proponent of this ennexation had asked that the Assessment
District No. ·9 sewer line be · oversized and he would pay for it. This was
done in the construction of the A.D. facility. This facility ties into
a line owned by the City of Orange which is not oversized to take in this
particular area, assuming full development of the area would be served
by the A.D. line. One of the things Mr. Harper mentioned that possibly
the Board needs to consider is that if this area is now annexed to th e
District without the construction of a proposed line that wou ld be out-
side the District to get it over there to serve it, no doubt the
proponent would ask to have the pumping station installed in the
development and then pump over the hill into the Assessment District
facilities. This is not part of the Master Plan. Question is if t he
area to be annexed to the District, is the Board going to permit this
type of a sewer situation? Will they accept a pumping station which
would probably be in the 70th Sewer Maintenance Dis trict which has the
tax rate of about $1.00 in addition to the 49¢ of District 7 -a pretty
substantial cost to whoever buys what might be developed. When annexation
first proposed to the District, was under the assumption that area was
going to be annexed to Orange and line would be part of Master P lan of
the District. Griset asked if the $1.00 rate would apply the other way
and Mr. Harper answered no, if we went by gravity, would go b y whatever
the City of Orange charged. Tax rate l ess than 5¢ if under 7t h SMD.
Griset asked if the applicants wanted to come in that way and Mr . Harper
said he didn't know. Miller questioned wh ether the Board would want to
approve them getting sewer service that way if they were willing to pay.
Mr. Harper stated that if the area were developed, we would have to add
another facility at some time to take care of this. Facility of City of
Orange not adequate to take care of area once it is f ully developed .
Miller asked if the District on demand be req uired to spend more money
for facilities. Griset also asked if Mr. Harper saw this a s a li ability
to District 7. Mr. Harper answered by go ing ahead with the annexation ,
assuming that the line is not going to be built by a gravity system,
it seems that the proponent would assume that he could pump over the hill.
Clark said he thought we had some false fears. Lot of assumptions.
Thought it would be appropriate to d e lay this. It was moved and seconded
to defer this item. It was then mentioned that this item had already
been moved and seconded . Smith then asked Engineer for more information
on the size of the City of Orange line. Conrad Hohener reporte d that it
was adequate for the drainage area, but when the drainage area becomes
full because of development within assigned area, it would be infringing
upon lines within tributary line.
Quigley moved to strike all words in previous motion and insert new words
to defer this item to January 3rd at 4:30. It was also suggested that
we do no t increase annexation fees for this annexation as a result of
this delay. Quigl ey agreed to include that in his motion . The motion
was seconded and carried. The question was asked who would notify t he
interested p art ies a nd the st~ff advised they would,
p. 6
· #48 -Anne ·xati·on No. 28
Reported that the applicant had been notified that the fees will go
up after this month and have been contacted by attorney for the estate
but no definite action has been taken on paying the fees. Smith
asked how long ago they were notified and was answered July 17th and again
November 7th .
. #53 -Contract 3-18
Culver indicated that a correction should be made to the minutes of
the District 3 Special Meeting on December 7th. It was "Route B"
rather than "Route A" recommended by the cons·ul t:ing engineers.
McWhinney stated that the City had contacted Collins Eichman, the Navy
and Edison Company. $28,000 to $30,000 if we go straight south. Will
not charge for that particular easement. Navy also indicates they
will work with us on parallel route but will need a couple weeks. No
problem with Collins Eichman. Suggested that District 3 might consider
coming down Goldenwest and cutting off on Main to Chestnut and then
take diagonal across. Probably the cheapest of all the routes proposed.
Conrad Hohener reported they had added Routes "F -North" and "F -South".
Our differences in cost o.rer and above Route B, which is the original
route, would be $30,000 per acre for right of way for routes which
require right of way. Mr. Hohener said McWhinney's suggestion of Route E
on Main Street and then westerly two blocks and down Chestnut and then
diagonally across the Edison right of way would be the cheapest of any
route. Said he was rather pessimistic about working with the Navy though.
McWhinney said City was w0rking with Navy on Flood Control channel and
possibly could be constructed at the same time and should be no problem.
Nissen stated that if City council didn't approve Route E and won't
approve a permit, then we have to take action to force them and we can
win, as with case of City of Huntington Beach.
Culver moved that we pursue the composite of Route E and F-South for
a cost analysis.
Herrin asked about the time problem and Culver said we were already
behind so a couple more weeks wouldn't matter.
Conrad Hohener stated that the staff andttieir recommendation .would
be Route F -South and work principally with the Edison Company.
Culver said that is what we recommend then -Composite of Route E and .
F-South and will have a progress report for the next meeting. This was
made into a motion, seconded and carried.
THE END