The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1972-08-30CQUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. D. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) Gentlemen: August 25, 1972 NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING DISTRICT NO. 2 WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 30, 1972, ·7:00 P.M; 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 . Pursuant to adjournmPnt of the regular meeting held August 9, 1972, the Board of D.irectors of County Sanitation District No. 2 will meet in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date. JWS:ss BOARtY.$ OF om~CTO~S Co ~1 n ty Senita Ho n D istrids of O ran:;'e County, Ca !ifo mia P. 0. Bo x .8127 !G8LJ4 Ellis Aven ue Founta in Valley, Cal if., 92700 (1 ) ( 2 ) -~( FILE fl .............. _ / lETIER .. ·-··- A/C .... TKLR - ADJ OURN MENTS PO STED ./ COMP & MILE l\G E .... 1C..n FILES SET UP .................... n ~djo urned Reg ular Mee tin g Aug u st 30, 1 972 -7:00 p.m. RESOLUTIO NS CERTI FI ED .. n ~~:~;:s ~;~:;N::::z.: MINUTES HLED ............... - Roll Call Appointment of Chairman pro tern, if necessary Consideration of motion to rec e ive and file l etter from United Stat es Environmental Protection Age ncy, dated August 23J 1 9 72, offering a grant of $1 ,5 8 6,090 for c ons tructio n of the Santa Ana Rive~ Interceptor, Reach J, Contract No . 2 -14-1. See pa.ge -~~~--- Fl~:;-:zw Con sj_deration of motion to receive -and file letter from CLh10 Ba.sin 1'1unicipal Water District, cated Augu st 28, 1 972 , advisi ng th e District that they will proceed with joint participation in the construction of the Santa Ana River Inte r·cepto r. See page ---'~~--- lETTER ....... - A /C .... TKLR - ............................ - (5) Con sidera tion of alternate pipe s izes re Santa Ana River Int ere e ptor , Co!1trae t l'lo. 2-J. 4 -1. See pc.ge ----'~~~'. ____ _ Cons ideration of sta ff re q uest to State Water Resources Contr ol Boar d for approval of co ncept for i ncrea sing the capacity of the Santa Ana River Interc eptor . See page __ 1_'.Q~--- ........... _ .. ___ {5) FILE9-./ ......... . Consideration of motion t o receive and file l e tter from S tat e Water Hesources ControI Board, date:d August 211, 1972, approving concept fnr increasing capacity of the Santa Ana Ri ver Interceptor . See LETTER ............ .. A/C .... TKLR ... . page -----~En --· ................................. ( c ) FllE ................ .. LEITER ............. . J\ A/C .... TKL R .. .. Report of sta f f re Environme ntal Frotc:ct i on Agency approval of concept for in~reasing capa city of the Sant.a A:ia River Interceptor (d) Report on f1nancing capability of District to increase l~1 /// c2.paci t.v of Santa Ana R :i. ver Intercentor. See pC1~ P-e /ti' . . -o · w"''-J 'l ___ _'._'l_n____ ()./? 11Y--. \J FILE ................ .. LETTER ............ ( 6 ) A/C .... TKLR ... . H•••Oo oooooo oo uoooo o ooOO ( 7 ) ( 8 ) ··~ Considera ti on o f moU.on to declare intent to -'~J.se t h e c apacity of the Santa Ana Pi VET Int erceptor ~~~~~~;}Pt upon approval by the Env i ronmenta l Protect i on Agency r1 Other hus:Lness and c ommu n ications, i f any Consid e ration of motion to adjourn 9/1,,cl ~~ 30 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 100 CALiFORNIJ\ STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94 i 11 County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County and Chino Basin Municipal Water District Attn: Fred A. Harper, General Man~ger 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley CA 92708 Gentlemen: Re: C 06 0741 AUG 2 3 1972 This Agency is pleased to offer the County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County and the Chino Dasin Municipal Water· District a grant of $1,58G,090(whicb includes an additional 10 per ccnturct for conformance \·1ith regional planning) to help in the construction of ·your Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reach 1. This grant offer is based upon your application as certified to this offic(; by the California State \·later Resources Control Boa.rd. If" yo'u wish to accc~pt this ~rrant offer, the original nnd one copy of the enclo:;ed "Part A11 of the Offer cind l':.cceptance of Federal Grant should be signed an·d returned to this office as soon as possible. One copy of your transmittal letter should be sent 9irectly to the Culifornia St_atc \·1at12r Resources Control Board. We are returning,. under separate cover, one set of your plans and specifications for this project. These plans and specifications have been approved by the California State Water Resources Control Board and are hereby approved by this -?\gency. Enclosed is a description of procedures with attach11.cnts which are necessary requirements. If yo':1 have any questions, please contact us . Agenda Item #3 -A- . Sincerely, Jittv~{?{r /I'{. fJo.u~~i·.¢,-t ,_J?aul De Falco, Jr. !J Regional Administrator .•· Distrj_ct 2 August 28, 1972 Mr. Fred Harper General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Street Fountain Valley, California Ref: Santa Ana Rtver Outfall Dear Mr. Harper: CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL DISTRICT J. ANDREW SCHLANGE GENERAL MANAGER TELEPHONE (714} 987-1712 Please be advised that the Chino Basin Municipal Water District has received grant approval for the above- referenced project; and, therefore, will proceed with its contractual commitments. · Very truly yours, j /it?lfp1v Sc) k hJ1 J. Andrew Schlange, General Manager -CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT /em 6555 ARCHIBALD AVENUE -POST OFFICE BOX 697 -CUCAMO~GA, CALIFORNIA 91730 ~~-~-------~--------------~~--------~~-------------------------~---------~~-------------~ ~~-----------.._._. __ ._........._ ........... .-..... .............. ._.__,__ __ "-...._.~----------~---------,_._.-- _.._...._..._...__. __________ ~ CARL B. MASINGALE PRESIDENT Agenda Item #I~ RAY W. FERGUSON VJl'.".,;-PRESI DENT \ ERNEST L. KEECHLEF! SECRETARY -B- ALEXANDER R. TOBIN DIRECTOR JACK F. COMSTOCK DIRECTOR District. 2 II I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORA1~GE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) August 18, 1972 Mr. John O. Nelson, Assistant Chief Division of Water Quality State Water Resources Control Board 1416 Ninth Street Sacramento, California 95814. Re: Grant Project No. c-·06-07L~1 Santa Ana River Interceptor Se1·1er, Contract No. 2-lh-l TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 .962-2411 The purposd of this letter is to request your considera- tion and approval of a concept for increasing the capacity of the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer by the issuance of a change order to the contr~ctor, to construct a larger diameter pipeline for the first reach of the project than proposed in the grant application, at no additional cost to the grant program. The Santa Ana River Interceptor ~'lill serve Orange, Riverside, and San· Bernardino Cotmties by providing a means '·:hereby wastewater deleterious to the groundwater supply of the Basin can be transported through a closed syste~·:1 to the Sanitation Districts' treatment facilities. This project will provide the major backbone pipeline for the Basin, which is the largest self-contained natural drainage basin (about 2300 square miles) in Southern California. The first reach of the proposed project as now planned ranges in pipe sizes from 63 11 to 54 11 and has a total design capacity of 80 mgd; ho~·:ever, only 30 mgd is allocated for the imr:iediate needs of the Upper Basin. The remaining 50 mgd \·rill be "" utilized in Orange County by County Sani ta ti on Dj_strict l'~o. 2 /to relieve its overloaded existing sewer system and to pro- vide capacity for the ordinary sewage flows contemplated to be generated by the current building activities. Your agency has heretofore determined that County Sanitation District Agenda Item #5(a) D-1 District 2 Mr. John O. Nelson A\lgust 18, 1972 Page 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORi.CiA P.O. BOX 8127 . 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, C-ALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 No. 2 will not receive grant funds for its por-cion.of this project. However, in the spirit of continuing cooperation to develop a comprehensive and enduring Water Management Plan for the Basin, contractural arrangements were conclud8d to insure that this pro- ject would be undertal:en. While the Water ~anagement Plan for th~ Santa Ana River Basin has not been finalized, the Plan will, no doubt, seek to provide options and flexi b:Lli ty for the optirnmn multiple use of major facilities to improve environmental quality. It is reasonable to asswne that, in addition to current requirement-s, the Sant'a Ana River Interceptor Sev1er will be needed for the diipos~l of many saline wastes, such as the blow do~n from future demiperalization plants and the sludges and other ,,.raste materials from water reclamation plants. It may be·desirable in the future to dlvert agricultural tail1·:aters and dairy runoff to these facilities to correct high nitrate problems. New technology for upgrading vra ter quality probably \·Till place additional demands. on this system. ·. The first reach of the project ~·Till extend from Treatment Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue. Its length is about 9 r;iiles through a highly urbanized portion of the District. The project follows the Santa Ana River ~~1ich has a very limited right of way and it is very unlikely that a similar facility could be constructed parallel with the proposed Santa Ana River project in the future. In addition, the future political climate in Orange Cotmty, or in the Be.sin for that matter, may preclude the construction of another pipeline to serve areas outside the County. This presen·t project has been debated in the three counties for many years, and it was only in February this year, after lengthy discussions, that the Sanitation Districts received per- mission from the Orange County Boara of Supervisors for the right of way to construct this facility. Therefore, since this project will be the major facility to implement the Water Management Plan for the Basin, consideration should be given to providing adequate capacity in the pipe- line at this crucial time to serve the knm·m and unki1o~·rn future requirements of the Basin. Agenda Item #5(a) D-2 District 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE Coutffr. CAUFORN'A P. o. eox e127 108"'4 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNT Alt-! VALLEY, C·ALIFORN:A 927CS (714') 540-2910 Mr. John O. I'Jelson August 18, 19'/2 Page 3 (714') 962-2-411 We have the .following options at this time: Option 1 Option 2 POTENTIAL PROJECT 66-inch to 84-inch dieJnetcr CONTRA.CTOR 1 S BID 125-184 mgd capacity $7,676,112.54 GHI-1..NT APPLICATION PROJECT 54-inch to 63-inch diameter Bo mgd capacity Additional Cost $6,274,608.40 $1,hOJ.,50h.14 With your approvaJ., the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 will consider, on August 30, 1972, the initiation of the attached chanGe order at no cost to the State or Federal grant progrruns. FAH:j Enclosure c:lLt. Q.~c~~ . Fred A. Harper 0 General Manager cc: Mr. Frank M. Covington, Director, Air and Water Programs Division, Environmental Protection Agency Mr. Richard Bueerme.nn, Executive Officer, California Regional Hater Quality Control Board, Santa _A.na Region Mr. Robert E. Moore, :Manager, Santa Ana Watershed Pl.arming Agency Mr. ·AndreN Schlange, Manager, Chino Basin Municipal Water District Boards of Directors, OCSD , Agenda Item #5(a) D-3 District 2 c.0:::~1·y S.\:~ r ·L\T 1 {. :: J; 1 ::·i·:·: J er:-. r :: CL 1 ... :\::1;r. c~~L::TY P. 0. :jvx 2>J.Z7 -l(;c.;.;,! Lllis :\venue fountain Valley, Laliiornia ~12708 DRAFT CONTRACTOR: Sully-Miller Contracting Company ... "T)~ C/\T,Tml\ l\'T'·TA nr1rr1n ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,~,,...,.,..,,..,r-r~Q" n--. · .-.•~ 1 ~ '\. --c r. -4 '"' \) i> • __ __, __ u_.r._ • .1._, .t_n._.11_.1_·• __ n ____ v_J.J_n_J._1·,_J._.r.i_.r_t '-'_.t._.L_l_'_..:_\ ~' _K.t._;,,;;.._! .. ~c __ .H_...;;;;;.·_-___;;;c~· l_;.}1-=:·1;..;;.· K..;.;;.--,;;...;~ :;...:T___.i~·rn~. -=-~--=-' _._ ______ _ Amount of this Ch&nge Order (ADD) CU~UUC·JY) $1,~01,504.14 In accordance with contract provisions~ the followin~ changes in the contract and/or contract work arc hereby authorized <lnd as cor;1pensation the r cf or , th c f o 11 owing ad cl it i on s to or cl e c.l u ct ions from th c contract pr i c c are he by approve<l. . .. ..,._, - ADD The Contractor is hereby directed to construct the RCP interceptor trunk sewer utilizing the sizes in Alternate III and in strict accordance with all the specifications for Alternate III fo1" the unit prices as 6Ub~itted by the Contractor in his proposal of Nay 11, 1972 · ·ADD Original Contract Price Prev •. Au th. Changes $1, 401, 504.1~ $ 6 , 27 4 , 60 8 . l~O $ ___ -...... o_-___ _ This Change (ADDrp11:JJ1J.r:c) $ 1,401,504.14 Board authorization date: September 7, 1972 CONTRACTOR: "' -· ENGI~:2ER: Lowry & Associates Agenda Item #5(a) Amended Contract Price $ 7' 676 ~ 112. 54 D-4 Approved: COUNTY SiU.:ITATIO?~ DISTRICTS of Orange County, California District 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY CONTROL ~OOM 1015, RESOURCES BUILDING 1416 NINTH STREET • SACRAMENTO 95814 August 24, 1972 Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager Orange County Sanitation Districts P. o. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. Harper: RONALD REAGAN, Governor Clean Water Grant for Santa Ana River Interceptor-Project No. C-06-0741 Contract No. 2-14-1 The c'oncept for increasing the capacity of the Santa Ana River Inter·- ceptor presented in your letter of August 18, 1972, has been reviewed. The certification of the project to the Environme_n tal Protection Agency was based on. an eligible flo·w of 30 MGD from the Upper Basin plus an ineligible flow of 50 MGD from-the Orange County Sanitation District. The 50 MGD flow was based on flow relief from the existing Orange county sewer system and projected Ct:l.paci ty for sewage flows generated by the current building activities within Orange County. The proposal to increase the size of the Interceptor from Treatment Plant No. 1 to Katclla Avenue to provide a potential maximum capacity of 184 HGD is based on a stated need to provide options and flexi- bility for optimum utilization of facilities in Orange County for possible blow down from future demineralization plants and the sludges and other waste material from water reclamation plants in a highly urbanized portion of Orange County .. The concept is approved for increasing the capacity of the Santa Ana River Interceptor to a maximum of 184 MGD for the reach from '11 reatment Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue at no additional cost to the grant program over the cost for th~ certified project based on a total maximum flow of 80 .MGD. The approval for increasing this size of the Interceptor for the subject project reach should not be assumed to ·apply to any future Interceptor reaches. The State's approval of the concept for increasing the capacity of the Santa Ana River Interceptor is subject to the approval of the concept by the Environmental Protection Agency.. If the Environmental Agenda Item #5(b) E-1 District 2 Mr. Fred A. Harper -2-August 2~, 1972 Protection Agency does not concur in the concept of increasing the size of the Interceptor for. the subject reach, the applicant should confine the construction contract to the 80 MGD certified project. Sincerely yours, 12/1. ill~-~-/ Paul R. Bonderson Chief cc: James M. Montgomery, Pasadena EPA, Region IX Chino Basin M.W.D. CRWQCB, Santa Ana Region Lowry and Associates Agenda Item #5(b) E-2 District 2 COUN-~Y St~NIT~TION O!STRICT BUDGET RECO!.-i~:1ENDATIONS Preli::i. 19'72/73 FISCAL YE.L\R 1972/73 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $},079,843_,2~~ i6.72//73 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5%DELINQ. SJ,025,851,0·,·_ · 7 '??. 73 EST. TAX RATE PER $ :oo. OF A.V. S· • 31~~: FUND #-2 .ACCT.Jl.1. CAPITAL OUTLAY ONE -CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 102,:/~: ------------------- APPROVED , -AP_P._R_O_V_E 0--,..,-E S-T-n-.1A_T_E_o_ I ! RE c OMMEN q rn DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET l ACTUAL I i BUDGET -----------------+--1_9_7_0_/_7_1-J-_l...;.....9_7._l/_7_:_2__.l_Ex_P_..1..~t97~-f~~ __________ . _ _1 ___ 19_. 7_2{]_°3{ _ PROJECTS AND EXPEHDITURES T~atment Plant Expansion & Ocean Outfall No. 2 _ __,__.___,-,--------------·--·------., ---------- Contract 2-13, Trask Avenue Contract 2-14-1, Santa Ana River Interceptor Trunk to Katella (184 MGD) Contract 2~14~2, Santa Ana River Interceptor from Katella to Riverside Frwy & Robert F. Finnell River Crossing Contract No. 2-15, Yorba Linda Pump Station & Force Main Contract No. 2-16, Palm Avenue Interceptor Contract No. 2-17, Carbon Canyon Interceptor Master Plan Report Joint Works Equity Purchase District Facilities Improve- ments and Extensions Tax Collection Expense TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE· Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 71-72 Actual Expenditures 71-72 Allowance .for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Delinquent Taxes ~eivable from CSD #3 ~ Joint Works Equity Sale Sale of Capacity Rights Federal and State Grants Interest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH & REVENUE ~ .. -.::oUNT 70 BE EAISED BY TAXES ~genda Item #5(d) 5,164,725 4,416,034 2,677,015 5_,076, 990 33,000 5,091,000 7,045,000 47,201 5, 5L~7, 000 ~ : . - I 2, 000 _,000 I 793,000 394,ooo 1, L~78, 000 f I 15,000 5, 3001 · 8 ,oou _ l 4-7' 162 I I 2L~, 000 41t-5, 000 2,154 I I 1,168,00() 9,000 7,000 6,750 I 1- l0,383,887 11,918,334 ! 2,733,120 1 9,000 ;i6,473)9';C t ~. :: ;; :: ' ·, ----·---- Djstrict 2 H rt I ro . I :J l .c;;:; \Jl ,,........ 0, l'-' ?:rj I [\.) I (3. . (fl c-r ,~ 1 ~· ct- 11\) ·. ( ' Descrj_ption Tax Reve nue (at current tax rate of $.4254) Othc :t Reve nue Federal & State Participation Joint Works Projects Dis·~-~ict 1Projects Sale o f Ca.pa.cj_ty Rights !·Hsce l lane ous Ca 1Ty -Ove r fror.i ·Previous Fiscal Year TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE t: ?: i··1:.:1 ·TJ) J: :r u~s !J is ~r ic':; Construction Share o r Joint Works Construction Bond Re tirement & I nterest Sl:are of J o int Operating Dis t ri c t Operat ing & Other Expenditures ·TOTAL EXPEND ITU-RE S Ca rry -Over to Fo llowing Fi scal Year Less : Necessary Res erve for F'ollowing Yea r Dry Pe riod l und Balanc e or (Def icit) One cent on tax rs,te will raise COUNTY SAN I TAT I ON DISTRICT ~O . 2 STATEMENT OF PHOJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEARS 1972-·.73 THROUGH 1 976 -77 1972 -73 1973 -71~. $ 4 ,36 4 ,ooo $ l+,605 ,000 2,556 ,000 2,896 ,000 758 ,000 845,000 6 1 8 ,000 3 75,000 1 0,720,000 9 ,7 53,000 $19 ,0 1 6,000 $18 ,474 ,ooo $ ~-, 651+, 000 $ 8,031,000 3 ,034;000 4,768 ,000 612,?00 590,000 767,000 787 ,000 1 96 '000 . 211,000 $ 9_,263_,ooo $14_,387,000 $ 9 ,753,000 $ l~ 087 000 !J I ) 7,285 ,000 r 6,247,000 $ 2 , 4.68_,ooo $(2,160 ,000) <i' y 102_,585 $ 108,227 1 974-75 1975-76 1 076 -:;7? ., ·-_/ -, I ~' $ 4 ,835,000 $ 5,077 ,00 0 $ 5 ,331,000 5,487,000 6 ,339,000 4 ,119 ,000 227 ,000 31,000 15,000 275 ,000 22 5 ,000 225,000 Lj., 087 , 000 2,586,000 -''~? or -1-,0.:.'._,.__QJ $1 4,911 ,000 $1 4 ~258 ,000 $1 1 ,312 ,000 $ 3,800,000 $ 1, 0 41+ ·' 000 $ 583,000 6,899,000 8,585,000 5,544 ,o oo 571,000 554 ,ooo 536,000 828 ,000 1 ,081 ,000 1,256 ,000 227 2 000 1 23 72 2000 265 ,000 $12,325,000 $12,6 36 _,ooo $ 8 1 81 1 ('''" > t ~"' 1 \..1 v $ 2_,586,000 $ 1,622 ,000 $ 3,128,000 5 ,837,000 4 ,171 ,0 0 0 2 .1 2'(.000 $(3 ,25 1,000) $ ( 2 , 51.+9 .• OO?) $ 1 ,001 _,000 $ 1 1 3 ,638 $ 119 ')r)l ':)t:..-$ 1r·c-00r:-r:._)-' "'-'-' { H ,, rt> 3 '-:Ij I v J Desc riDt ion ~~x Re venue (at curre n t tax r ate of $.425 4) Other Revenue Federal & State Pa r t icipation Joint Works Proje ct s Dis~rict Projects Sale _ of Capac ity Rights l -'~ir.c ·:;llaneo us Carry -Over from Pre vious Fiscal Year TOTAL F UJ:<'DS AVA ILABLE District Construc t i on Sha:.c e of Joint Wo r ks Con s truction Do~d Retirement & Interest Sl 12.re of Joint Operating f,j_st.!nict Operating & Othe r Expend i ture s TOTAL EX PEND I TUHE S carry-Over to Followin g Fi scal Year . . 2:css : :·I2ce s sar y Re serve fo r Following Ye e.r D r y Peri od fund Ba l an ce or (Defi cit ) 0w: cc E t on tax rate will r a i se COUNTY SANITATIO N DISTRICT NC . 2 S'rATElvlENT OF' P HO,TECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEAHS 1972 -.73 I'HROUGE 19'("6 -77 1972 -73 1973 -7 1 ~ $ 4 _,364_,ooo $ 4 ,605 ,000 2_,5 56_,ooo 2 ,165 ,000 758 ,000 845,000 618 _,ooo 37 5 ,000 1 02720,0 00 9,753 _,ooo $19 ,016,000 $17 ' 7 LJ-3, 000 $ 4,654,ooo $ 8 ,031,000 3 , 03L~, 000 4·, 338, 000 612,000 590,000 767 ,ooo . 787 ,000 196 ,000 211,000 $ 9, 26 3 _, 000 $13,957 _,000 $ 9,753,000 ~) 3 '786 ·' 000 7_,070,000 7 l~o3 000 :> -' $ 2,683 ,000 $ ( 3-' r(07; 000) $ 102,585 $ 1 08_,227 "" { -r""\Q '7 ') (·~C::l.1 -1 <.." Revi s ed . 1974 -75 1975 -7~ 197b -T r' $ 4_,8 35_,ooo $ 5,077,00 0 ~ 'i' 5 -::i -:i, C'o·· '_\_)..l. ,I I ' .• 5 ,947 ,000 8,278,000 6:8 98 ,ooo 227-,000 31,000 1 5)000 275 _, 000 225,000 225, 01..IO 3,786~000 253 J ooo { 12 1 67 _ _.... 00 0 ) $15, 0'(0' 000 $13 ,864,ooo $11 ,302 ,000 $ 3 ,800 , ooo· $ 1 ,044,ooo $ 583,000 . 9,391,000 l0,980,000 7 _, 8 ~-1) 000 571,000 554 ,ooo 536,000 828,000 1,08 1,000 1,256,00 0 22 7 ,000 1,372 ,q_oo 265 . COCI _ $14 _,817 _,ooo $1 5_,031 ,000 $1 0 ,1+8 1,000 . / . ,h '? 2 53,000 $(1,167,000) $ 8~'.l , OOd 7 2 034 ,ooo 5,320,,000 2 ?C'r-)("' '.._\_:::.>.i t. _,,' ..... $(6 ,781,000) $(6 ,487 ,000) " ( I .,.. , . ~ 1, ·~ Uli , \)i._\) ~· d· ,p 113,638 $" 119,321 $ , ')C...., ~\"'~; ..l..t-...,1' ·' ~ I t:• j ' ( ' COUNTY SA~ITTATION DISTRICT ~O. 2 r!~ REVISED SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS,(A) lg, I P' _____ P_:r_'o_.1_· e_c_t ____ _ Total Upstream Dist. No. 2 1970/71/72 H j~~ .·.·~~.:it.a Ana River Inter- ij c1"1)tor (Plant No. 1 to j ·t: :~nt:ella Avenue) 184 MGD $ 8,450,000 ·$ 2,600,000 $ 5,850,000 L ~ ;.,-: .. ·~~·c'l1ta Ana River Inter- , ...... ·.~(.~: tor (Katella Ave. to ~·:.i ·.:c 1·side Freeway) and Hot.·e:rt F. Finnell River Crossing ~;~n.:ta Ana Ri ,12r Inte:r- <>·p tor (Hi versicle Free- ·,·:u:/ to near ~aunty line) 3,200,000 1,200,000 2,000,000 5,900,000 3,700,000 2,200,000 ~·:n. tc .r Heclar:ia tion Plant 8,500,000 5,100,ooo(B) 3,400,000 Yorba Linda Pwnp Station ···,ry and Force Main 793,000 ! rulm Avenue Interceptor · c~1 r'l'on Canyon Interceptor :~_;out!1 Santa .:-... na River lr::terceptor !(~·aemer Interceptor c:,;i i·bon Canyon Dam 1:1 tc rceptor Orchard Interceptor I:ic'.~field Interceptor Other Small Projects · 39~,ooo 1,478,ooo 745,000 323,000 549,000 178,000 380,000 2042000 $31., 094. ~ 000 $12.,600,000 I i ' .. l ~osts include engineering and contingencies IJeminera1J.zation Facilities to be constructed :)v On1nr.:.e Cou~·1ty Hater District 793,000 394,ooo. i,478,ooo 745,000 323,000 ::;49 000 _./ ' 178,ooo 380,000 204.,ooo $18' lj.94' 000 $303,000 ·792000 $382,000 1972-73 1973-74 $2,797,000 $2,750,000 500,000 1, 500, ooo. 1,100,000 l,000,000 396,000 397,000 197,000 197,000 739,000 739,000 323,000 25.,000 25,000 $4,654,ooo $8,031,000 ( 1974-75 $1,100,000 2,400,000 275,000 25,000 $3.,800,000 ,__1 U.l.,J' J.. ( _• He vised !. ~j r , .. 1975-76 1~76~77· -·-..:....#--.... .; $ 745,000 274,0JO $178,ooo 25,000 2S.OOO :pl, 044' 000 MA l~A.G1iR 'S AGt:N DA REPOft T ll~ l County Sa nitaticn Di $trids i>. 0. Box 5i75 10844 ~!Ii:; Avenue of OrMge County / C&liforn ia Fou nt oin Valley, Cal if., 92708 ----ll -- DISTRICT NO. ADJOURNED REGULAR .MEETING August 30, 1972 Wednesday -7 :00 p .m. T .,f.,ph ones: Are~ Cod,, 711~ 540-291 0 962-2411 The Board adjourned to t he above time for the purpose of consideri ng the alternative acti ons which the Direc tors may desire to take pertaining to the award of Contract No . 2-14 -1 (Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Reaches 1, 2 , and 3), to Sully Mi ller Contracting Company , Long Beach_, on September 6 . On August 23, t he Environmental Protection Agency approved the Grar1t application of the Chino Ba sin M.un ici.pa l Hate r Di s trict in the amount of $1 ,586,090 (80% of the ir share ) for this seg,'Tient of the project . The appl i- cation for the Gr ant was based on a design capac ity of 80 :rr'.gd ; 50 mc:;d will be ut i lized by Di strj_ct No . 2 whil e the r ema ining 30 mgd is allocated for the use of the Upp e r Bas in e ntities through the Chino Basin Mun icipa l Water District . We have received verbal assurances from the General Ma n age r of the Chino Basin Municipal Water District that the y are now in a po siti on to proceed with the joint constructj_on of the Santa Ana River Inte rc eptor . We h ave asked for a l etter confirm- ing this fac t. The project was bid wj.th three a lt e rnate sizes of p ipe and the result of the bid ding on the a lternates is enclos ed . As previously discussed with the Bo ard on June 29 , 1 9r(2 , it may be desirable to c ons truct the l arge r f aci lity known as Alternate III . On August 18 , we r e ques t ed Stat e and Federal approval of a c on cept for increa sing the capacity of the int e rc eptor by the issuance of a Change Order to the con - tractor to c onstruct a larger diameter pipeli ne than proposed in · the Grant appli cation at no additional cost to the Grant program. A copy of the request is enclosed for the Di rectors ' i nfo rmation . As of this writing we have b een advised by t elephone that the St a te has approved the Cha nge Order concept. On Au gust 1 6 , 1 972, Director Finne ll and you r General Manage r disc u ssed the Change Order concept wi th Federal representatives in San Francisco . They d i d not appear very receptive t o the idea, even though i t woul d not i n- volve addit i onal Federa l funding . At Wednes d ay 's meeting, we will r eview the Districts ' finances and hopefully we will hav e a n answe r from t he Environmental Pr otection Agency concernin g their pos i tion on Al ternate III . FAH :j Enclosur es Fred A. Harper General.Manager MEETING DATE August 30, 1972 TIME 7:00 p.m. DISTRICTS 2 DISTRICT 1 ACTIVE DIRECTORS (HERRIN)····· GR I SET····· --___ _ (CASPERS) •••• BATTIN ••••• --___ _ (WELSH) •••••• MILLER ••.•• ------ PORTER. • • • • _____ _ nlSTRICT 2 ~PEREZ) •••••• SM I TH· • • • • • _.:{_ --__ CULVER····· 7-_~ _~ (LANGER) ••••• FINNELL .1.'·q~ (KOWALSKI) ••• FOX·.······ -~----- (GR I SET) ••••• HERRIN····· _&..._ ----(HOLLitm~N) •• JUST······· -"----- (ROBERTS).·.·· NEVIL······ __:;.------~CASPERS) •••• PHILLIPS... '7 ---- REINHARDT) •• -filOT ....... ~ ---- DUTTON) ••••• STEPHENS~. --r ---- (CASTRO) ••••• WEDAA .1 ~0 ••• _ _L_ ___ _ (POTTER) ••••• WINN ••••••• __L_ ---- DISTRICT 3 CULVER ••••• (CASPEBS) •••• BATTIN ••••• ~HINES) •••••• DAVIS •••••• KOWAl-S KI ) • • • FOX •••••••• COEN) ••••••• GREEN •••.•• _____ _ (GRISET) ••••• HERRIN····· ------ (FRANKI EWICH). LACAYO······. ------ (NUIJENS). •• • LEWIS······ (MILLER) ••••• LONG······· MC WHINNEY • (RE I NHARDT) •• ROOT ••••••• (BLACKMANl ••• SALES •••••• !HOLL I NDEN ). • • SCOTT •••••• DUTTON). • • • • • STEPHENSON • ROBERTS). • • • • STEVENS •.•• BYRNE) ••••••• VANDERWAAL • DISTRICT 5 (CROUL). •••••• MC INNIS ••• (BAKER) ••••••• CASPERS •••• (MC I N N I S ). • • • KYM LA • • • • • • DISTRICT 6 PORTER • • • • • (PHILLIPS)··· CASPERS···· (MC INNIS) • • • STORE······ DISTRICT 7 (WELSH) •••••• MILLER····· (CASPERS) • • • • CLARK • • • • • • (HERRIN) • • • • • GRISET • • • • • PORTER •• • • • (r.lSCHBACtf) ••• QUIGLEY •••• ~ INNIS) •••• ROGERS ••••• \PEREZ) •••••• SMITH ••••• ~ DISTRICT 11 (COEN) ••••••• GIBBS • • • • • • (CASP~RS) • • • • BAKER • • • • • • (COEN) • • •• • • • DUKE • • • • • • • DISTRICT 8 BOYD • • • • • • • (CLARK) ••••••• CASPERS • • • • MITCHELL • • • 7/31/72 JOINT BO~.RDS ACTIVE DIRECTORS CLANGER).) ..•.• FINNELL ••••• ___ _ (CASPERS ..•• BAKER ••••••• (CASPERS) •••• BATTIN •••••• ---- CASPERS ••••• ----·-- (CASPERS) •••• CLARK ••••••• ----. ----CULVER •••••• ___ _ ~HINES) ••••••• DAV IS ••••••• __ --· COEN) •••••••• DUKE •••••••• ___ _ KOWAl-SKI ) •••• FOX •••.••••• (COEN) •••••••• GI BBS ••••••• ---- ( C 0 EN). • • • • • • • GREEN • • • • • • • == == (HERRIN) •••••• GR I SET •••••• ---- (GR I SET). • • • • • HERR I N • • • • • • __ __ (HOLL I NDEN) ••• JUST •••••••• ___ _ (Mc INN Is) .... KYMLA ••••••• ---- (FRANKi EWICW· LACAYO • • • • • • ---- (NU I J ENS ). • • • • LEW I S • • • • • • • ---- (MILLER) •••••• LONG •••••••. ___ _ (CROUL) ••••••• MC INNIS •••• ---- MC WHINNEY •• ----~WELSH) ••••••• MILLER •••••• ---- ROBERTS) ••••• NEV IL ••••••• ---- CASPERS) ••••• PHILLIPS· •• • ----· PORTER •••••• __ -- (FI SCHBACtf ) ••• QUIGLEY • • • • • __ -- (MC INNIS).· • • ROGERS • • • • • • ___ _ (RE I NHARDT). • • ROOT • • • • • • • • ---- (BLACKMAN) • • • SALES • • • • • • • ---- (HOLL I NDEN). • • SCOTT • • • • • • • ---- (PEREZ) ••••••• SM I TH •• • • • • • ---- (DUTTON) •••••• STEPHENSON •• ---- (ROBERTS) ••••• STEVENS • • • • • ---- (MC INNIS) •••• STORE ••.•••• ---- (BYRNE) ••••••• VANDERWAAL •• __ -- (CASTRO).····· WEDAA • • • • • • • ---- (POTTER).····· WINM • • • • • • • • ---- OTHERS * * * * * BOYD········ ----. MITCHELL···· ---- HARPER BROWN SYLVESTER LEWIS DUNN CLARKE SIGLER NISSON TAYLOR BROWN BOETTNER CARLSON FINSTER GALLOWAY HOH EN ER HOWARD HUNT KEITH LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON\ MURONEY J PIERSALL) STEVENS / c;Tr , .. ,,.., '-..: ... '. ..... I> ()Q (1) :::s 0.. IU H (-t <tl 3 Vl I 0 I CONTP..ACT FOR : SANTA ANA RIVER IN·TERCEPTOR SEWER CONTRACT NO . 2 -14-1 50 MGD CONTRACTOR ALTERNATE I -x-sully -Mil l e r Contracting Co . 1 . Long Beach $5 ,516 ;069 .8 3 Za rubi'ca Company ' 2 . Sun Va lle y 5 978,761 .24 Ko rdick & Rados , Inc . 3 . Hun tington Be a ch 6 ,33 2 ,473.94 TAB Construction 11 ...,. . Las Vegas 8 484 557 .25 *Corrected figur e s ENGINEEH 1 S ESTI:tViA T E : AI.,TER NA TE I A LTEHNA T E II ALTERNATE III 54 -66" Dia . 80 MGD ALTERNAT E II $6, 274,, 608 . L1.o 6 .677 .770 .81 . - 7 ,082,,078 006 9)077,968 .61 $5 ,622,610 . .:J3 6,51 0 ,921 .37 8 ,942 ,015 .31 66 -84 11 Dia . 184 MGD ALTERNATE III $'7,676,112 .54 8 ,180 ,09 1.70 8, 685, 8 L~8 . 71 10 ,,2 96 ,555 .59 I TlJ pt,1 p l- /I 1 /f LI 3. s f'l/v, c/V u ~l,;r fr I G~l 4.f ;1-i /./I; ~;vz,, e:-:_ I , / o I c/'l/V '('l.1r. 1"f I - ..,41 !-,_,,..., J ~ r..,;'\.) I ~I-J ;t-lf .If 3 ,:{ SY 7 t-V~ f I ,¢-fl /,Il- l ' ~ c.1 ;tlfu ---.>'; 7<'11, ell/° J <:>1.'"'0 The Register 8-17-72 to. BUILD WASTE LINE OC Water Board OKs Joint Powers Pact Hy JERRY CHANEY eventually into Orange County . Register Staff Writer underground water basin. SANTA ANA-Orange County Chino Basin Municipal Water Water District (OC\VD) clirec-District has committed itself to tors Wednesday night approved I ioininCI' the a u t h o r" i t y, said entering into a joint powers Owen ° and \Vestcrn :Municipal . authority to build a $10 mil,ion Wate; District of Riverside · waste pipeline from Prado Dam County and San Bernardino Val-: to the ocean. ley Municipal Water District The project, if com~letcd, are being invited to join. should improve the quality of I The waste line project will be Orange .Cot~nly'~,.w.ater s~bstan-lthe authority's first project. tially, d1stnct. ou1c~als said. . 1 I Owen ~tated. The agency, to be The waste line will be capab.e 11 d the Santa Ana Watershed of.handling 30 million gallons a ~~oject Authority, will have the day of nonreclaimable waste power to L'>sue revenue bonds. discharged from t.he upper San-Owens said state and federal 1 ta _Ana River basin, said Lang-grants are expected to finance don (Don) Owen, secretary-80 per cent of the waste line . manager of OC~VD. . . construction. Above Prado Currently, this waste 15 • be-Dam local entities would build Jieved to be finding its way mto ' the Santa Ana River and, thus, (Turn To Page At5) · Joint Powers (Continued From Page A3) feeder lines to the main line. I The waste will flow to Sanita- : tion Districts of Orange County '. plant in Fountain Valley, where · it will receive primary treat- . nient and then be discharged into the ocean, officials said. Owen said he feels the author- ity-now a permanent agcncy- already is off to a sound finan- cial start because Chino· ~Iunici pal has guaranteed to utilize 20 per cent of the main line's capacity and another agency's guarantee is in prospect. According to the agreement approved by OC\VD direct~rs Wednesday night. the authority · will be controlled by a commis- . sion appointed by the members 1 of the joint powers authority. I The authority's purpose is to : undertake "projects for water ! quality control and · prot~ction ; and pollution abatemen~ m t_he I Santa Ana River Watersned, m- ; eluding planning, construction, 1 operation and maintenance of ! works and facilities ... " Each member a£:ency of the ! authority has the right to veto I a proposed project under the ~ agreement. according to Mil-! ; ford Dahl Sr., OCWifs attor- 1 ney. · t OC\\TI board chairman Henry ~ Segerstrom said he doubts that , many people in Orange County ; would realize '·the long-range· I benefits" o! forming the new authority. I 12 Part ll·Mon., Aug. 21, 1972 R County Water District to Join in Waste· Line · Directors Approve $500,000 Outlay to Help. Build Project Afong the S~nta Ana River SANTA AKA-Orange County WatPr District di- rectors have approved a $500,000 outlay to help build a waste water line along the Santa Ana River bank from Prado Dam to a.· treatment pla.nt in Hun- . tington Beach. Directors also voted to · participate in the forma- tion of the Santa Water- shed Project Authority, a joint powl!rs agency tlrnt will ser\.re HS the means to finance 1 he line. Other agencies that have. indicated interest in the plan but ·which have not Yoted approval are ·the Chino Basil~ Municipal Water Dj;:,trict, 'Vestern l\Iunicipal Water District of Hiver~idc County and San Bernardino V a_l le y :Municipal \V~ter District. The agency's top "prior- ity would be the spending of $10 million for 30-mil- ·lion-gallons-a-day capacity rights in the line below Prado Dam. -. Grants Expected Orange County Water District's $500,000 share would be in addition to an expected 80~~ in grants from the state and federal gov emments. Directors said the money would be taken out of the general fund. However, they pointed out that the investment could be recovered over . the year::; as the 'vater dis- trict sold its line capacity The wateJ" <l istrict would not requir:--the capacity that \\~ouhi be ~liocated to it. i,' "The project -~ould 'be worthwhile because of the ' improvement in the qual- : ity of the Santa ~\na River eve~ if the line cost is not recovered" Xeil C 1 in e, ·· assistant w a t. e r district manager, said . Joint Project If the Western l\Iunici- pal and the San Bernardi- no districts fail to go along with ,the plan, Orange County ·water District di~ 1·ectors a'greed to partici- pate with the Chino ·agen~ cy on the same financial terms. Chino · B a s i n officials have l>een working with the Orange County Sanita- tion Districts for m ore than a vear in an effort rto jointly ·finance a S16 mil- ~ ... ~ .. lion 23-milc sewer Jine along the west Santa Ana ' · · River levee. ~· · Chino, however. has not . worked out its financing and the Sanitation Dis-· tricts have pushed ahead. · Chino b a s i n officials '. have been seeking a \:Vay ~ .to handle the hig-h saline . flows out of the c'.hino-On-. tario-Cucamonga -Fonta- na regions. These briny waters drain toward the Prado Dam and add to Or--' ange County's concern over the increasing con- tamination of the Santa Ana River. -------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ----II -------+-r-k~'L-;r J>., -wdltu-Jt ~fi:------ ---111 ke_,,/ ~~ ef/,f'</~_(!.P ~J &<-,,.,J'/. f ! ( (/. It ?J;::;.·;_;;~=/flU~ ~r=z.~~ _ ----. . -_____£;.__~~ ~_1,L/,A. iL. A . I ---------- ---------T------=r =---~---____ --:_------------------ 11 . . -----------r ----------------- --f --------- 'I -----___,._ ----------- ------------------ · --- -----tr·· ··-------------· ------------- 11 -·~11 ·----------- ----------;----------··--------------·-------··--·--------·-·---------