Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972-08-09 �rtiunos COUNTY SANITA-f CO AREA COON 714 ION DISTRICTS '�' - . T E L E ON 540-2910 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 9 6 2-2 41 1 P. ❑. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, 5AN DIEGO FREEWAY) August 4, 1972. TO: IM EMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 2 3 5 .1 6 7 85 AiID 11 Gentlemen: The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County San�.tation Districts Nos . 1., 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 11, of Orange County, California, viill be held: Wednesday everting, August 9, 1972 at : 3 7 0 p -me 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Malley, California 1 SeCry ary U Tentative adjournments prior to next regular niee ,ing: District No . 5 - 11 : 30 p.ri. , August 29 at Nev,pert Beach City Heal.l District No. 2 -- 5 : 'iO p.m. , September 6 MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT Post Office Box 8127 County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 JOINT BOARDS 96224101 August 4, 1972 REGULAR. MEETING Wednesday, August 9, 1972 7:30 P.M. The following is a brief explanation of the more important non- routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but will appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting. Joint Boards Nos. 10 and 11 - REPORT OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND ACTIONS ON COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATIONS : The Committee met on the evening of July 25 with Directors Baker, Lewis, Scott and Vanderwaal as guests . As described in the enclosed report of the Executive Committee, Chairman Finnell and I are scheduled to meet today with representatives of the Environmental Protection Agency and the State Water Resources Control Board to discuss the matters described in the report and under Item No. 65 (Santa Ana River Interceptor) . No. 12 - CONSENT CALENDAR: The following agenda items fall into this category in accordance with the definition established by the Boards : (a) Approval of License Agreement with Nakase Brothers. This firm, which raises nursery stock on an adjacent parcel, has requested permission to use for this purpose a portion of our interplant right of way south of Adams Avenue, adjacent to the Santa Ana River. Since the use of the property in this manner will benefit the Districts to some extent in reducing weed abatement costs, we are recommending entering into a license agreement providin for an initial payment of $150 and an annual payment of LOO for this use . The annual payment corresponds to a fair rental value of the approximately 2 acres involved. (b) Award of Truck-Mounted Hydraulic Sewer Cleaner. Bids for £Fis equipmen liic wasincluded in hie recently adopted capital outlay budget, were opened today (bid tabulation enclosed) and we are recommending award to the low bidder, Southwest Flexible Co. , at the bid price of $17,376.37. (c) Attendance of Districts ' Personnel at Woodward Governor Conference. It is recommended that the General Manager be authorized to designate a member of the Mechanical Mainten- ance Department to attend a Woodward Governor Company Prime Mover Control Conference at Ft. Collins, Colorado, August 29 through September 1. Because of the use at the treatment plants of a large number of digester gas engines which require efficient maintenance, we believe attendance at this conference is desirable from a training standpoint . Funds for this trip have been included in this year ' s budget. (d) Abandonment of Joint Works Facilities . During the course of construction of additions and improvements to our treatment plants certain minor items of property are rendered obsolete or unusable. For accounting purposes it is necessary to remove the value of these facilities from our books and we therefore recommend the adoption of the resolution included with the agenda material under this item. This procedure is followed annually. (e) Chan e Order No. 4 Job No. J-7-2. This contract with B: H. bSi ler Construction Company for the current altera- tions and additions to our administrative office building should be completed in a few weeks . As is usual in building construction, a number of small changes were required during the course of construction and the recommended change order will authorize the addition of $3957.11 to the contract price for 14 of these changes as described in the formal change order. (f) Change Order No. 3, Plant Job No. P2-11-1. We are recom- mending adoption of the change order included with the agenda material adding a total of $15,779.87 to the contract price for this ,job (Headworks "C" Expansion at Plant No. 2) for the extra work detailed in the change order. It will be noted that the largest item ($7833.80) is for replacement of the original fresh air ducting systems which, on examination after beginning of the work_, :were found to be badly deteriorated. They will be replaced with corrosion- resistant material. The contractor was required to take three competitive subcontract bids for this duct work. (g) Attendance at National Meeting of Water Pollution Control Federation in At----rant It is recommended that the General Manager be au prized to attend the annual meeting of this organization which represents all aspects of the waste treatment and water pollution control field in this country and several foreign countries. Concurrently, the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies will conduct their meetings at the conference site. We have been active in both organi- zations and these conferences have proved to be extremely valuable to the Districts. -2- (h) Authorization to Reimburse Employees for Attendance at In- Service Traininm Course for Public Works Construction Inspectors . It is recommended that he Districts authorize payment tuition ( $280) for a maximum of seven employees for this 12-week course to be given at California State University at Los Angeles . Attendance will be on the employees ' own time. Nos . 18, 243 31, 40, 47, 513 59 and 66 - ADOPTION OF INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT BUDGETS : Although these items must be considered separately under the individual Districts ' business, the Director of Finance will review all of the budgets at one time. These preliminary budgets have been reviewed by members of the Executive Committee at the Committee 's July 25 meeting. In view of the discussions held by the Executive Committee concerning the effect of the new State Ocean Water Quality Control Plan on future tax rates, the Directors may wish, in certain Districts, to consider adjustments in the preliminary budget figures . District No. 11 No. 23 - ORDERING ANNEXATION NO. 16 : This annexation of the former site of the Sunset Beach Sanitary District Treatment Plant is ready for final approval. District No. 1 No. 29 - AWARD OF JOB NO. P2-20 : Bids for this regularly scheduled Plant contract (Power Reliability Project at Plant No. 2) were opened on June 15 (see bid tabulation with agenda material) . It will be noted that the low bidder, Mel Gorham Electric Company of San Diego, was approximately $190,000 below the engineer's estimate, due principally to the depressed condition of the electrical manufacturing industry at this time. However, award has been delayed pending receipt of assurances that State and Federal financing will be avail- able for this project. The last date on which an award can be made under the specifications is August 14, with the contract to be dated 15 days after award. It appears now that the grant assurance will be forthcoming within two weeks; hence we. are recommending that the award be made at this time to the low bidder with the added precaution of obtaining the firm's consent to dating the contract September 18. A letter from the contractor consenting to the extension of the contract date is expected before the Board meeting. No. 30 - PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WARNER AVENUE SIPHON: The Directors will recall that engineering design for this estimated $25,000 job was authorized at the June 14 meeting. Plans and specifications are now ready for approval and inasmuch as the work involved should be accomplished during the dry season, we recommend that it be authorized for bids to be opened on September 7. Districts Nos . 1 and 7 No. 32 - SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR (CONTRACT NO. 7-6-1) EASEMENT: At the July meeting the General. Counsel reported that there was an error in the description on the original grant of easement from A. J. Gisler. Accordingly, it will be necessary for the District and the landowner to exchange a quitclaim and new easement deed with the correct description. -3- District No. 3 No. 37 - PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 3 : Included in the agenda material is a letter from the proponents of this annexation in the area of the U.S. Naval Ammunition Depot. The proponents have now submitted the necessary fee for processing of the annexation and it is recommended that it be referred to the staff for report at the September meeting. No. 38 - TEMPORARY RENTAL AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CONTRACT NO. 3-17: Construction on this project, the first stage of the Knott Interceptor, is now under way. The contract documents specify that the District will furnish a temporary construction area on private property west of the intersection of Brookhurst Street and Ellis . Avenue. At the time of this writing we are in final negotiation with the landowner in an attempt to establish a reasonable price for use of his property and if these negotiations are complete by the time of the Board meeting, it will be recommended that the agreement be approved for execution. No. 39 - PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR CONTRACT NO. 3-17: The plans and specifications for this job, as described in the preceding item, also provide that the District will obtain a temporary easement parallel to Newland Street, near the San Diego Freeway. In negotiating with the landowners, they have stated they are unwilling to grant an easement but will only sell the property Outright. The staff does not recommend fee purchase of the necessary easement but recommends that the General Counsel be authorized to file court action for immediate possession, which will give the District a better bargaining position. District No. 5 No. 44 - ADDENDUM NO. 1, CONTRACT NO. 5-19 : Prior to receipt of bids for this job, as described in the following item, it was necessary to issue an addendum to the plans and specifications changing some of the technical provisions . Prior to award of the contract, it will be necessary to approve this addendum. parallel Pacific Coast HighwayNo. 45 - AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. 5-19 : Bids for this contract, the I existing gravity sewer system Force Main and remedial work on the District was fortunate in th seen from the bid tabulation, included with the agenda material, the at the low bidder was approximately $115,000 (15%) below the engineer ' s estimate while the balance of the nine bids were above the estimate. The contractor A. G. Tutor Co. , Inc. and N. M. Saliba Co. , a Joint Venture, North Hollywood, has indicated that he is ready to proceed with the work at his low bid and since it will be necessary to complete the Pacific Coast Highway portion of the work during the winter season, we are recommending award of all three items of work to him at this time . No. 46 - CONSIDERATION OF ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY WITHIN THE DISTRICT BY THE IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT: Included with the agenda material is a request from the Local Agency Formation Commission for the District 's comments, if any, on this proposed annexation. Accompanying ^ the request is a map showing the boundaries of the proposed annexation -4- in relation to the boundaries of the District. The staff would appreciate guidance from the Directors as to whether any comments on this annexation should be made to the Commission before the August 11 ^ deadline. No. 50 - ADJOURNMENT TO AUGUST 29 FOR CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 507: In compliance with the existing District connection and use ordinance to which the proposed ordinance will be an amendment, interested persons and agencies have been notified that the Board will consider adoption of this ordinance on August 29. We therefore recommend that the Board adjourn to this date at 4:30 p.m. at the Newport Beach City Hall to consider adoption of this ordinance, a copy of which has been previously submitted to the Directors. District No. 8 Nos. 51 and 52 - .ITEMS CARRIED OVER FROM JULY 12 BOARD MEETING AGENDA: Because of the lack ,of a quorum of the Directors at the July meeting the Secretary adjourned the meeting to August 9 . These items which appeared on the July agenda were therefore carried over to this meeting. District No. 7 No. 55 - ORDERING ANNEXATION NO. 29 : The required fees have now been paid by the proponent of this 5-acre annexation and it is recommended for final approval. No. 56 - APPROVING EASEMENT FOR CONTRACT NO. 7-6-2 : This easement for the above master plan sewer is being furnished at no cost by the Irvine Industrial Complex. It is recommended for acceptance. No. 57 - ASSIGNMENT OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9 FUNDS TO MERIWETHER INVESTMENT COMPANY: The action appearing on the agenda is recommended as a routine and customary procedure. No. 58 - LETTERS FROM SANTA ANA AND TUSTIN REGARDING FUNDING OF WEST RELIEF TRUNK: As recently directed by the Board, letters were sent to the t.•ro cities requesting funding of this project, which is now out for bid, from the respective District Tdo. 7 connection fee funds of the two cities . At the time of this writing we have received the requested assurance from the City of Santa Ana but not from the City of Tustin. Since it is possible that the Tustin letter will be received before the Board meeting, it will be placed on the agenda for receiving and filing along with the Santa Ana letter. District No. 2 No. 63 - AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY FOR SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR CROSSINGS: This is a routine agreement required by the railroad company for crossing under their tracks at two locations during the construction of the first reach of the interceptor, a con- tract for which is expected to be awarded on September 6 (see Item No. 69) . -5- No. 64 - PROGRESS REPORT ON ANNEXATION AND CONNECTION FEES : Chairman Smith and the staff will report verbally on developments in connection with establishment of a new annexation fee policy and connection fees . As directed by the Board, a meeting was held with City officials on August 2 which proved to be quite productive . No. 65 - STATUS OF SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR: As mentioned in the report of the Executive Committee, Director Finnell and myself are meeting today with representatives of the Environmental Protection Agency and the State water Resources Control Board. One of the matters to be discussed is Federal and State funding for this project in behalf of the Chino Basin Municipal Water District, without which it is likely that the Chino District will withdraw from the recent joint construction agreement. A full verbal report on this matter will be made at the time of the meeting. No. 69 - ADJOURNMENT TO 5:30 P.M. , SEPTEMBER 6 : It is recommended that the Board adjourn to the above hour and date to consider award of the contract for the first reach of the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, very favorable bids for which were opened on May 11. The contract documents specify that the award will be made within 120 days thereafter and, consequently, if the award is to be made it will be necessary to do so before September 8. Prior to September 6 the Chino Basin Municipal Water District will be required to indicate whether it will participate in the construction cost in accordance with the agreement reached last spring. Fred A. Harper General Manager -6- OF DIPECTORS j� ,oan3p Sz Citation [3istricts P- o- Box 8127 i 4D "; Ta,qe vOUIlty, California 10844 Ellis Avenue #� Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Ttl AGENDA Final August 9 , 1972 - 77:30 p .m. ADJOURNMENTS......:// COMP & MILEAGE..... ........ FILES SET UP ...................... RESOLUTIONS CERTIFIED,y/ (1) Pledge of Allegiance LETTERS WRITTEN .............. MINUTES WRITTEN,,,,,,,,,,,,, (2) Roll Call MINUTES FILED,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (3 ) Appointment of Chairmen pro t,em, if necessary FILE ..._._ 4 ) DISTRICT 8 LETTER ..........,,, Consideration of -action to receive and file minute A/C ....TKLR . excerpt from the City of Laguna Beach regarding election of mayor and appointment of alternate , and '-- seating new member of the Board -(5) DISTRICT 8 Annual election of Chairman _ (6) EACH DISTRICT on�ideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: mlS District 1 - July 12, 1972 regular District 2 - July 12, 1972 regular District 3 - July 12, 1972 regular District 5 - July 12, 1972 regular District 6 - July 12, 1972 regular District 7 - July 12 , 1972 regular District 8 - October 13, 1971 regular, January 12, 1972 regular, April 12, 1972 regular, and July 12 , 1972 regular LETTER .............. District 11 - July 12, 1972 regular A/C ....TKLR .... {'] ) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman LETTER ..----_.._. c ....TKL (8) A_I:T-' DISTRICT.. Repol t of the General Manager FILE --- - ) ALL DISTRICTS LETTER ............ Report of the General Counsel A/C ....TKLR .... - (10) ALL, DIISTRICTS _.........._. - - - -- '.;epo_ris of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee ' s written report m ►� (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the FILE .................. Executive Committee: LETTER ............ ' (a) Consideration of Resolution No . 72-102, assuring A/C ....TKLR _. Environmental Protection Agency of intent to -- ---------M'Z initiate construction of facilities which will meet or exceed the levels of wastewater treatment required Cb) by State and Federal laws . See page "D" 2) ALL DISTRICTS LETTER ........... A/C ...SKLR CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items . All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar . All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered separately in the regular order of business . Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by. the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items Roll Call Vote or cast appearing on the consent calendar not specifically Unanimous Ballot removed from same . M 'CQ- -jft4____QDnsideration of Resolution No . 72-103, authorizing the en anA er to execute License to Occupy Right of Way Agreemen kase Brothers to grow nursery stock on the Districts ' :n'�ht of way. See page "Ell FILE .._.___._.. pub) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid LETTER ' ...... tabulation and recommendation, and award purchase A/C —..TKLR .... of Truck-Mounted Hydraulic Sewer Cleaner, ------------- Specification No . A-062, to Southwest Flexible Company, -- -•..•.. in the amount of $17, 376 . 37 See page "F" (c ) Consideration of motion authorizing the General FILE -.-- Manager to designate one employee to attend the \.1 LETTER .—_...... Woodward Governor Company Training Conference at A/c ....TKLR ..., Ft . Collins, Colorado, August 29 - September 1, -„ 1972; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred FILE ...........(.d.) Consideration of Resolution No . 72-105, ordering LETTER .............. value of certain abondoned or removed structures A/C -..TKLR .... and equipment removed from the Districts ' books _-................. of account . See page "G" -2- (e) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 , FILE --•— to the plans and specifications of Administration- LETTER ...--- Engineering Building Addition, Job No. J-7-2, authorizing A/c .-MR an addition of $3,957 . 11 and granting an extension of ----------- time of 71 calendar days to the contract with B. H. Miller ------ Construction Company. See page 'IH" (f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 3, FILE to the plans and specifications of Headworks "C" Expansion LETTER ..---_ at Plant No. 2, Job No . P2-11-1, authorizing an addition A/C TKLR ..„ of $15,779. 87 and granting an extension of time of 30 calendar days to the contract with E.T. I. & Kordick, a -"•" Joint Venture. See page "I'I (g) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager FILE — to attend the Water Pollution Control Federation conference LETTER — - in Atlanta, Georgia, October 8 - 12; and authorizing Art:-MR - reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging, and incidental .............. expenses incurred (h) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate up to seven employees to attend an In-Service FILE . Training Course for Public Works Construction Inspectors, 't ER September 15 through December 8, 1972, conducted by TKLR California State University at Los Angeles , in cooperation with the American Public Works Association; and authorizing payment of registration fees in a total amount not to - exceed $280. 00 (13 ) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any FILE . LETTER ..._....... (14 ) ALL DISTRICTS A/C ....TKLR ..__._._..._.. Report of Director of Finance regarding fiscal year 1972-73 _ individual Districts ' budgets (15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file certification nn �t� of the General Manager that he has checked all bills f ` appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment (16 ) ALL DISTRICTS sou CALL VOTE- -'. Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving warrant books for signature of the Chairman of District No . 1, and authorizing payment of claims listed on page "A" (17 ) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications, if any FILE —------- LETTER pA (a) Consideration of Resolution No . 72-109, accepting Vehicle A/C ----TKLR „.. Roll Call Vote or Cast Maintenance Facilities, Job No . J-12, as complete and .___,•�„� Unanimous Ballot authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion. See page I'EE'I (b) Report of Special Committee on Agreement with Orange FnLt.Ie �y(� County Water District; and consideration of Resolution LETTER ."4•-„ham No. 72-27, authorizing execution of an agreement with c —Tax Roll Cell vote or cast Orange County Water District to provide 15 mgd secondary Unanimous Ballot treated water for Water District reclamation facility and -- - the right to discharge a like amount of salt brines and - - - •• other residual material to Sanitation District facilities . See page TIFF" (Copy of agreement in meeting folder) FILE ._._.._.__. (c ) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to LETTER ......„,„, award purchase of Control Center Air Conditioning System . A/c _TKLR Emergency Replacement, in an amount not to exceed $10 ,000 . See page IIGG" -3- (18 ) DISTRICT 6 M/S Consideration of roll call vote motion approving 1972-73 ROLL CALL VOTE,,,,,,,fiscal year budget . (Copy in meeting folder) (19) DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants, if any. See page B � _,=_�:'Y�=-ma°t•' r© arna�rts��'—gin- (21) TRICT Ot r bus n s andnmunications, if any (22) DISTRICT 6 - Consideration of motion to adjourn �' 4ol FILE -- /,23) DISTRICT 11 LETTER . ..... .-.. l Consideration of Resolution No. 72-107-11, ordering A/C ....Tat Call vote orall cast U annexation of territory to the District (Annexation No . 16 - nanimous Ball--------•-•-• ryj Huntington Harbour Annexation No . 4 ) See page "J" (24) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of roll call vote motion approving ROLLCALLVOT2. 1972-73 fiscal year budget . (Copy in meeting folder) ' (f5) DISTRICTS 3 & 11 /44 SS Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants, ,441 if any. See page "B" (26) DISTRICT 11 S Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "C" (27) DISTR T 11 Other tWiness and co unications, if any .,me r,' ,,,, fiWL (28 ) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn g � (29 ) DISTRICT 1 Award of Power Reliability Project at Plant No . 2, Job No. P2-20 : FILE .._.......... 'c\ LETTER ..............M J (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Mel Gorham Electric Company, dated August 4 , 1972, A/C "'.TREK -.-. consenting to establishment of contract date of ............ September 18, 1972, for Power Reliability Project at —M- Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-20 . See page "K" FIE __.._.-."..— ETTER .✓ (b ) Consideration of Resolution No . 72-104 , to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding A/C __TmR Roll Call Vote or Calbower Reliability Project at Plant No . 2, Job No. P2-20, Unanimous Ballot to Mel Gorham Electric Company, in the amount of $158, 294 • ......... See pages "L" and "M" (30 ) DISTRICT 1 FILE..—." / Consideration of Resolution No . 72-108, approving plans and LETTER S specifications for New Siphon, Greenville-Sullivan Trunk, A/C __TKLR Roll Call Vote or castContract No . 1-13; authorizing advertising for bids to be "bnanimous Ballot opened August 24, 1972 at 11: 00 a.m. and authorizing the General ... Manager to award said contract to lowest responsible bidder. ......................... See page "N" (31) DISTRICT 1 NIjS Consideration of roll call vote motion approving ROLL CALL QTE_W,�972-73 fiscal year budget . (CCTIY in meeting folder) -4- (32) DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Report of General Counsel re easement obtained for construction of Sunflower Interceptor, Contract No . 7-6-1, MI5 and consideration of the following: IVI' S (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 72-115, authorizing FILE ........ acceptance of Grant of Easement from A. J . Gisler et al . , LETTER Unanimous Ball lot or a ROII Call Vote a Cast f permanent easement relative to construction of ._.__..... nip ...TKLR .... Sunflower Interceptor, Contract No . 7-6-1, at no cost to the Districts. See page 110" (b) Consideration of Resolution No . 72-116, authorizing execution of Quitclaim Deed for portions of existing A/c _TKLR Roll Call Vote or Cast District easement to A. J. Gisler upon receipt of Grant Unanimous Ballot of Easement relative to construction of Sunflower -- Interceptor, Contract No . 7-6-1. See page "P" (33) nramnrnmo i v 7 if ally . stf� page "ell (34) DISTRICT 1 rnls Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "B" (35) DISTRICT Othe busine nd commun_�tions, if any (36) DISTRICT 1 M1� Consideration of motion to adjourn g . �5 (37) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of request for annexation of approximately n� 155 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of FIB+t,S the U. S. ' Naval Ammunition Depot LETTER ............ (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letters from n/c TKLR _ Shapell Industries, Inc . , dated November 5, 1971, and S & S. e Construction Company, dated July 20 , 1972 , and August 4 , I'. 1972, requesting said annexation . See pages 'IQ" and "R" S (b) Verbal staff report (c) Consideration of motion approving in principle annexation of approximately 155 acres to the District in the vicinity of the U. S. Naval Ammunition Depot, subject to payment of annexation fees in the amount of $97, 561. 17 (154 . 89 acres ) and payment of $10 . 00 per residence served, in advance, until annexation is complete (38 ) DISTRICT 3 SE _-------/ M Consideration of Resolution No. 72-106-3, approving Temporary .ETTER .._✓ !'°I� Rental Agreement with Joseph R. Callens relative to right of 7alleg sr.oWloeajl g p o A/C ....iagJ ;Up a3,Aj1qoiou way in connection with construction of Knott Interceptor, a Unanimous Ballot Portion of Reach 1, and Reaches 2 & 3, Contract No . 3-17 . __.._._.. See page I'S" -+J4_)..,,pISTRICT 3 Consi of Resolution No. 72-109-3, authorizing and directing the Gen a el to initiate proceedings in eminent domain to acquire rig needed for construction `,,, of Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1, Contract No . 3-17 . See page 'IT" (40) DISTRICT 3 ROLL CALL VOTE- Consideration of roll call vote motion approving 1972-73 Tl/S fiscal year budget. (Copy in meeting folder) (41) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving warrants , if any . See page "B" (42) DISTRICT -3 Other business and communications , if any -5- (43 ) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn 8, 414F FlLE (44) DISTRICT 5 LETTER ..._......... Consideration of motion approving Addendum No . 1 to the nAIS plans and specifications for Pacific Coast Highway Force A/c TKLR "" vl Main, Contract No . 5-19 . See page ?lull ----• --` (45) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of Resolution No . 72-110-5, to receive and Rc'i C:u vote or Castfile bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding Unanimous Ballot contract for Sewer Trunk "B" - Unit 8 - Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-19, to A. G . Tutor IY4 Company, Inc . and N. M. Saliba Company, in the amount of $678, 500. See pages llVtl and nWn FILE -.___-_ _.( 66))DISTRICT 5 LETTER _.._.._..... Consideration of request of the Local Agency Formation A/C —TKLR .... Commission for comments on proposed annexation to the —- Irvine Ranch Water District of territory within District No. 5• See page ttXtt (47 ) DISTRICT 5 R.xL GALL VOTE................. Consideration of roll call vote motion approving M[S 1972-73 fiscal year budget . (Copy in meeting folder) (48 ) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any . See page "B" (49 ) DI ICT 5 - Other -us iness �d comm cations, if any (50 ) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 4 : 30 p.m. , August 29, 1972 at Newport Beach City Hall for consideration of adoption of Ordinance No . 507 � c51 (51) DISTRICT 8 Consideration of roll call vote motion approving 1972-73 K IS fiscal year Operating Fund budget in the amount of $3, 400 . See page llytl (52) DISTRICT 8 FILE Consideration of motion to receive and file Annual Report LETTER ..._.—.... I � submitted by Hanson, Peterson, Cowles and Sylvester, Certified A/C _..TKLR .... MI Public Accountants , for the period ending June 30, 1971, —•--•-•--••� previously mailed to Directors by auditors (53) DISTRICT 8 Othe usiness an communicattl s, if any (54 ) DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion to adjourn � • �� FILE ..- (55 ) DISTRICT 7 E'RE Consideration of Resolution No . 72-112-7, ordering annexation all Vote or Cast of territoryto the District (Annexation No . 29 - Portion A/CUq�nimous allot 7•� of Tract 6967 ) See page riZrl -� (545) DISTRICT 7 FILE .--------_----- Consideration of Resolution No . 72-113-7, authorizing 1 LETTER ............. M 1 acceptance of Grant of Easement from Irvine Industrial A/C _ TKL;pt1,.Call Vote or cast Complex, for a permanent easement relative to construction Unanimous Ballot of Jamboree Road Subtrunk No . 2, Reach 53, Contract No . -------- 7-2D-6, at no cost to the District . See page "AA" —6— (57) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file Assignment by ---- - \\\\ Ramar Company, contractor for Assessment District No . 9 UTTER .............AA � work, to Meriwether Investment Company, for monies due in A/C _..TKLR :::. connection with said Assessment District work, as recommended by the Special Counsel for Assessment District proceedings `(58) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from the City of Santa Ana, dated July 20, 1972, concurring with FILE (� 1 � the proposed routing of the West Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches ._..& 1 LMER _ 19, 20, and 22, Contract No . 7-5-1R; and authorizing the A/C .—.TKLR .... transfer of $324, 000 from the City' s County Sanitation _._--_------ W District Number Seven Main Trunk Fund to District No ... 7 for construction of said facility. See page 'tBB" (59 ) DISTRICT 7 ROLL CALL voTE.,,. Consideration of roll call vote motion approving MIS 1972-73 fiscal year budget . (Copy in meeting folder) (60) DISTRICT 7 1 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. (� t See page "C" (61) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications , if any FILE (a) Consideration of Resolution No . 72-117-7 , authorizing LETTER . M lS acceptance of Grant of Easement from Irvine Industrial '—""—'Roll Call vote or Cast Complex, for a permanent easement relative to construction A/C ....TKLR —Unanimous Ballot of Jamboree Road Subtrunk No. 1, Reach 47, Contract No . - 7-2C-2, at no cost to the District . See page "DD't (62) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn g' S3 FIt .._�/`�,3) DISTRICT 2 nER . 1! I - Consideration of Resolution No . 72-114-2 , authorizing A/C ....TKLR �.�p . execution of an agreement with Southern Pacific _--Tills Transportation Company for crossing under Southern Pacific right 'of way at two locations in connection with construction of Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No . 2-14-1 . See page "CC" LETTER (64 ) DISTRICT 2 A/C _..TKLR S Progress report re annexation and connection fee policy (Memorandum from Chairman in meeting folder) --- S65) DISTRICT 2 LETTER Staff report on status of Santa Ana River Interceptor, A/C ....TKLR (!1�5 Contract No . 2-14-1 ---------------f-6-6) DISTRICT 2 ROLL CALL.-V=...... Consideration of roll call vote motion approving /n 1972-73 fiscal year budget . (Copy in meeting folder) (67 ) DISTRICT 2 lhlc Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any . !' See page "B't C68, DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications, if any (69 ) DISTRICT 2 s-o Consideration of motion to adjourn to p .m. , August 30, for consideration of award of Santa Ana River Interceptor, M from Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue, Contract No . 2-14-1 9 ; /7 -7- I'•iEETTilG DATE Allwu,st 9o19972 TIrefE 7:30 p .m„. DISTRICTS _1,2,_9,,556 ,7,7x8 ,_&ll DISTRICT 1 ACTI-yE DIRECTORS _ n JOINT BOARDS ACTIVEDIF.ECTOPS • • • • • GRISET • • • • • ✓ Y t�IEF;R I N) ._� LANGER . . . . . . F I NNELL . . . , . CASPERS) . . . . BATTIN • . • . . ✓ CASPERS) . . , . BAKER . . . . . . . (WELSH) . . . . . . MILLER . . . . . �CASPERS) . . . , BATTIK . . . . . . PORTER . . . . . . . . . . (I.ASrGRS) . . . . CLARK , . 00 , so r )TR I CT 2 CULVER . ... . . . v (PEREZ) . . . . . . SMITH . . . . . . ✓ ✓ _ �HINES). . . . . . . DAVIS . . . . . ;-. CULVER . . . . . ✓ :0_1d,. . � . 1 . . . DUKE — 3 . . . . . (LANGER) . , . . . F I KNELL . . . . �KOWA SKI ). . . . FOX . . . . . . . . . KOVIALSKI ) • • . FOX . . . . . * * * v (COEN • • • . • • • • G IBBS . . . . . . - GRISE"f) • • • • • HERRIN • • • • • V ti (COEN) . . . . . • • GREEN . . . . . . . (HO LL I N D N�) . • J. • .. . • • • ✓ _____ (H E R P i N G P I S ET 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . (ROBERM . . . . NEVIL . . . . . . ✓ GRISET . • • • • . I-NERRIN • • • • • . (C ASP ERS) . . . . PH I LL I PS . . . ✓ �HOLLINDEW- • . . . . . . . . . (MC INNIS)• • • • KYMLA • REINHARDT) . . ROOT • • • • • • DUTTON) . . . . . STEPHENSON . (FRANKIEWICO• LACAYO • • • • • • CASTRO . . . . . ►VEDAA . . . . . . `' �NUIJENS) . . . . L.EW I S . . . . . • . POTTER . . . . . WI NN . . . . . . . ✓ kMILLER). . . . . . . . . . . . . . (CROUL). . . . . . . MC INNIS • . • . DISTRICT 3 MC WHINNEY • • _ (WELSH) MILLER CULVER . . . EVIL (CASPE �) . . . . BF,TTIN . . . . . - - �ROBERTS).. . . . . . . . . , . . __V_ F•- ✓ ✓ CAS► ERS). . . . . PH I LL I PS . . . . HINES. . . . . . 0 DAVIS . . . . . . v ✓ PORTER . . . . . . v UEN WA SKI ) . . . FOX . . . . . . . . ✓ ✓ (F I SCHBAC�N)• • • QU I GLEY . . . . . � . . . . . . . GREEN . . . . . . ('"` _ . . RS . . . . . . y .Ilk. ir�c �,. R dG E GRISET) • • • • • HERRIN . . . . . %0 (RE IN HARD T)• • • ROOT . . . . . . . . FRANKIFWI CH). LACAYO . �c c• • a (BLACKMAN) • • • SALES • • • • • • • NUIJENS) . . . . LEWIS . �• • • • \000, ._ (HOLLI ''DEN). . . SCOTT . • • , . • . M I LLER) . . . . . 4ma' 4& . . . " . PEREZ). . . . . . . SMITH . . . . . . . . MC WHINNEY . DUTTON). . . . . . STEPHENSON`I . . REINHARDT) . . ROOT . . . . . . . ✓ (ROBERTS) � •1 • • . S'1'EVENS • . • • • _� �BLACKMANI , . , SALES . . . . . . �M%. I N r IS) STORE . . . . . . . (HOLLI N EN). . . SCOl-T . . . . . . (BYRNE.- VANDERWAAL . . � BUTTON) , . . . . STEPHENSON . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . C BERTS) , , . . STEVFNS . , , , J v (CASIRO) ��EDAA.�— . . . . . . . . . . . . . .CPOTTEN; WINKRNE). . . . . . . VANDERWAAL . Y, DISTRICT -15 (CROUL). . . . . . . MC T NN I S . . . BOYD . . . . . . . , _ ---- (BAKER). . . . . . . . . . . M I TCHELNo . . . . ✓ (MC I NN I S). . . . KYMLA . . . . . . OTHERS DISTRICT 0 HARPER PORTER • • • • - v `'` BROWN �PH I LL I PS) . . . C* S . . • . ___,C " ^ ' S YLVESI-ER MC INNIS) . • . STORE . . . . . . ✓ LEWIS DUNN DISTRICT 7 C LAR KE 4VELSH� • • . . • • MILLER • • • • • SIGLER N I SSON�� ✓ CASPERS) • • • • CLARK . . . . . . y' T�,'�'LOR HERRIN) . . . . , GRISET . . . . . �.' PORTER . . . . , BROWN . L' .� T SCHBAC-I). . . QU I GLEY �,• BOETTNER I N �I S�. . . . ROGEi� S . :-.�. . MEREZ� . . . . . . SMITH . . . . . . FINS ON FINSTER DISTRICT 11 � GALLOiVAY �4 HOHENER ✓ v (COEN) . . . . . . . G I B B S . . . . . . _ .— —_._.__ � HOWARD'HUNT CASP _RS) . . . . BAKER . . . * . • "--- COEN! DU' ` — KE I TH LYNCH DISTRICT 8 MAR T DDOX BOYD , . . . - . r. ✓ KURONEY (CLARK). . . . . . . G 0. SoY L P I ERSALL -� M I TCHELL STEVENS . t/';iZ/72 n T RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS August 9, 1972 — 7 : 30 p .m. r , JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO . IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT •'R�t3' A-=1 Equipment Rentals, Equipment Rental $ 156.00 .iv41 c. ^1133 ADCO Fire Protection, Fire Extinguisher 1, 549.o8 s 356.08 1d 134 Advance Electric, Moto r Rewind Repair , 5 9. 18435 All Bearing Service, Inc ., Conveyor Parts 98.97 18436 The Anchor Packing Co., Pump Packing 232.55 18437 Azusa Western, Concrete T 1688.93 18438 Backflow Prevention Device Testing Service, Valve Testing g .75 18439 Bomar Magneto Service, Inc ., Terminals 35.91 18440 Brenner Fiedler & Associates, Compressor 155.40 18441 Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams 12.50 18442 Building News, Inc., Inspection Manuals 28.35 18443 Cal-State Seal Co., Tubing 263.97 18444 Calif. Assn. of Sanitation Agencies, Workshop Registration 7 5.00 18445 California Collator Sales, Reproduction Supplies 58.94 18446 California Hardware Co. , Hardware 146.79 18447 State of Calif. Board of Equalization, 1971-72 Sales Tax 377.13 1844g Certanium Alloys, Steel 114.61 18449 Brian Chuchua ' s, Truck Parts 80.34 18450 College Lumber Co,, Inc ., Building Materials 341.56 181451 Consolidated Electrical Distr., Electrical Supplies 626.49 18452 Constructors Supply Co., Hose & Fittings 759. 18453 Paul A. Cooper, Grit Removal 1,056.00 18454 Copeland Motors, Inc ., Truck Parts 57.94 18455 Leelon L. Cory, Employee Mileage 9.00 18456 Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts 348.54 18457 Costa Mesa County Water District, Water 17.66 18458 County of Orange, Parcel Maps 4.99 18459 Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage 26.58 18460 Daily Pilot, Bid Notices 18.85 18461 Di--Line Corp. , Standard Specifications (MO 4-12-72) 3,816.28 18462 Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling 136 .00 18463 The Drawing Board, Inc., Office Supplies 106.82 18464 E.I. DuPont DeNemours & Co., Training Materials 105.53 18465 Eastman, Inc. , Office Supplies 381.59 18466 Electric Supplies Distributing Co., Electrical Supplies 33.90 18467 Electronic Balancing Co., Drive Unit Balanced 175.00 l8468 Enchanter, Inc ., Ocean Research & Monitoring (MO 12-14-66) 21692.50 18469 Enterprise Printing Co., Specification Covers & Printing 148.79 18470 Fibre Glass Evercoat Co., Inc., Resin 96.57 18471 Fisher Controls Co., Regulator Parts & Freight 516.99 18472 Fischer & Porter Co., Chlorinator Parts 32.36 18473 Fletcher Jones Chevrolet, Truck Parts 5.09 18474 Foundation, Calif. State University, L.A., Registration for Public Works Inspection Course 280.00 18475 William H. Fox, Employee Mileage 13.50 18476 Freeway Machine & Welding Shop, Machining 72.00 18477 Fremont Bag, Drum & Salvage Co., Operating Supplies 141.75 18478 GAF Corporation, Machine Repair 76.27 184 9 General Electric Supply Co., Electrical Supplies 345.07 Telephone Co. 2 139.18 184�0 Generalp � 18481 Georgia Pacific Corp., Building Materials 240.83 ,, 8482 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc., Piping Supplies 979.32 `,0483 Curtis Hayes, Employee Mileage 18.00 18484 Hermes Plastics, Inc ., Engraving Supplies 145.22 18485 Hertz Equipment Rental Corp., Equipment Rental 162.68 18486 Higgins Trucks, Inc. , Freight . 14 �848 Howard Supply Co., Piping Supplies 433. 21 1847 City of Huntington Beach, Water 7.70 18489 Huntington Beach Art Gallery, Certificate Frames 183.43 6 18490 I & R Equipment Corp., Tool Repair .75 18491 Industrial Water Conditioning, Equipment Rental 40.00 18492 International Business Machines, Maintenance Agreement 43.39 18493 International Harvester Co. , Truck Parts 113.32 A-1 WARRANT NO . IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 18494 Irvine Ranch Water District, Water Service $ 18.20 18495 Johnston Pump Co., Electric Motor (MO 2-9-72) 4,410.00 18496 Edward Just, CASA Workshop Expense 111.04 497 KAR Products, Inc., Hardware 47.18 `T8498 Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies 860.49 18499 Kelly Pipe Co., Pipe Supplies 757.25 18500 Kleen Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies 2508.96 18501 Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware & Tools 3.97 18502 LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies & Hardware 722.30 18503 L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Rental 1,964.00 18504 Judy Lee, Employee Mileage 29.70 18505 Lewco Electric Co., Equipment Repair 76.84 18506 R.W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., Paving Materials 246.75 185077 Majestic Fasteners Co., Hardware 215.35 18508 Matheson Scientific, .Lab Supplies 127.59 18509 Mesa Supply, Truck Parts 158.76 18510 Meter Components, Meter Repair . X .00 18r-11 Mine SafetY APPliances Co.� 0 erating Supplies .18 18512 Munselle Supply Co., Inc., Safety Equipment Service 48 .70 18113 National Chemsearch Corp., Cleaner .70 18514 Nelson Auto Service, Truck Repair 32.00 18515 Nelson Dunn, Inc., Compressor & Engine Parts 177.02 18516 Newport Auto Works, Towing Charge 22.50 18517 City of Newport Beach, Water 5.00 1851 C. Arthur Nisson, Retainer & CASA Workshop Expense 1,025.50 18519 Oakite Products, Inc ., Solvents 99 .91 18520 City of Orange, Water 9 .27 18521 Orange County Lumber Co., Building Materials 222.24 18522 Orange County Radiotelephone 49.46 18523 Orange County Water Works, Water 4.35 18524 Orange Valve & Fitting Co., Pipe Supplies 163.90 18525 Pacific Telephone 398.92 18526 Norman I. Parsons, Employee Mileage 6.30 18527 John J. Phillips, Employee Mileage 98.28 18528 Pictorial Sciences, Aerial Photography 685.91 18529 Pierce Chemical Co., Lab Supplies 49.20 18530 Postmaster 300.00 18531 Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage 43.86 18532 The Purdy Co. of Calif., Iron 564.69 i8533 Rancho Bernardo Travelodge, Lodging - CASA Workshop 13.65 18534 Harry F. Richards, Employee Mileage 15.00 160535 Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing 138.71 18536 Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Repair 141.60 18537 Santa Ana Electronics Co., Electronic Supplies 69.51 18538 Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies J7.76 18539 Scientific Products, Lab Supplies 7.02 18540 City of Seal Beach, Water 25.20 18541 Seal Black Co., Inc ., Chemicals 14.70 18542 See Optics, Inc., Safety Glasses 49.20 18543 The Sherwin Williams Co-., Paint Supplies 85 .07 18544 8 5 ' The Singer Friden Division, Maintenance Agreement 26.r-0 18545 Smith Engineering Co., Incinerator Parts 112.24 18546 Southern Calif.. Edison son Co. 24,073.82 g547 Southern Calif. Gas Co. 2,099.39 *A-6548 Southern Calif. Water Co. 3.59 18549 South Orange Supply, Piping Supplies 177.09 18550 Southwest Flexible Co. , Equipment Rental 945.00 18551 Southwest Processors, Oil. Removal 205.00 18552 Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water 52.19 18553 Speed-E-Auto Parts, Truck Parts 216.86 18554 Standard Oil Co ., Gasoline 496.5'k 18555 John W. Stang Corp., Freight & Pump Parts 1,880.54 18556 Starow Steel, Steel 365.71 18557 Sully Miller Contracting Co., Paving Materials 46.23 18558 System 99, Freight 29.83 A-2 i WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 18559 Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage $ 29.22 18560 T & H Equipment Co., Inc ., Equipment Repair 4o8.87 18561 39 Stake & Building Supplies, Survey Supplies 6.14 62 Thomas Bros. Maps, Binders & Atlas 243.52 I%r,63 C.O. Thompson Petroleum Co., Kerosene 157.25 18564 Tony' s Lock & Safe Service, Hardware & Locks 16 .57 18565 Harry L. Twining, Employee Mileage 9.30 18566 Union Oil Co., Gasoline 12.57 18567 Union Sign Co., Signs 27.83 18568 United States Helium, Lab Supplies 308.18 18569 University Office Equipment, Inc., Office Furniture 138.22 1.8570 Utilities Supply Co., Tools 5.65 18571 Vaniman Camera, Photo Processing & Supplies 90.27 18572 John R. Waples R.S., Odor Consultant 229.70 18573 Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc., Engine Parts 10022.35 18574 Robert A. Webber, CASA Workshop Expense & Employee Mileage 34.90 18575 Western Salt Co., Salt 37.28 18576 Wilson Engine & Equipment Co. , Gaskets 150.70 188577 Russ Wold, Employee Mileage 27.06 5788 World Travel Bureau, Inc ., Meeting Travel Expense 86.40 18579 Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage 71.70 1858o John M. Wright, Employee Mileage 15.00 18 581 James Wybenga, Employee Mileage 15.30 18582 Xerox Corp., Reproduction Service 840,00 18583 Zodiac Paper Co., Printing Supplies 491.ol 18584 James To Zurn, Employee Mileage 34.65 18585 Coast Insurance Agency, Liability Premium 13,384.0o 18586 Fred A Harper, Various Mtg. & COD Expense 214.11 18587 Rancho Bernardo Inn, Lodging - CASA Workshop 126.86 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING $ 86, 338 e 72. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 18588 Bassett Office Furniture Co. Office Furniture $ 413,31 18589 Carollo and Keith, Survey I-8 3,785.00 18590 John Carollo Engineers, Engineering - Plant Constr. 9,831. 77 18591 County of Orange, Compaction Test I-8 1, 524.27 18592 William P. Ficker, A .I.A,, Architect J-12 3.4598.50 18593 Hermes Engraving Machine Corp., Engraving Machine 1,026.90 18594 E.T.I. & Kordick, Contractor P2-11-1 28, 504.97 18595 Freedom Newspapers, Inc., Bid Notice I-8-3 84.19 18596 International Business Machines, Typewriter 595 .35 18597 Kordick & Rados, Contractor I-8 778. 463.24 18598 B.H. Miller Construction Co., Contr. Jn7-2/J-12 5' 9 . 18599 Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Pipe Testing I-8 50 0 18600 Republic Carloading & Dist. Co., Freight 18.90 186ol Richard Terry and Associates, E.I.S. 72-73 Projects 7,138.90 18602 Twining Laboratories, Testing P2-11-1 38-0 603 F.T. Ziebarth Co., Inc., Contractor P1-3-1 6,070.4o TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING $ 851,o4o.28 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF $ 937,379 .00 A-3 r DISTRICT NO. 1 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 186o4 Boyle Engineering, Survey-Design 1-13 $ 235.50 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 18605 Lowry & Associates, Engineering 2-15, 2-163 2-175 & 2-18 $ 43351.87 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 18606 Boyle Engineering, Engineering & Survey 3-17-1, 3-17 & 3-18 $ 185526.50 DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 18607 Boyle Engineering, Survey 3-17 $ 653.50 186o8 Joseph R. Callens, Temporary Easement 3-17 13950.00 186o9 Osborne Laboratories, Inc . , Pipe Testing 3-17 23225.00 18610 J. F. Shea Co. , Inc . , Contractor 3-17 653727.00 $ 705555. 50 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 18611 City of Newport Beach, Connection Collection Fee $ 5o4.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 18612 Daily Pilot, Bid Notice 5-19 $ 44.48 18613 Shuirman-Simpson, Engineering 5-19 55579.89 $ 53624.37 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 1863L4 State Board of Equalization, Annexation No. 29 Fee $ 32.53 ter' ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 18615 Boyle Engineering, Engineering 7-5-1R $ 13582.00 18616 Title Insurance and Trust Co. , Title Report 7-5-1R 4o0.00 $ 15982.00 CONSTRUCTION FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 18617 Boyle Engineering, Survey 7-6-3 $ 192.75 18618 Colich Construction Co. , Contractor 7-6-3 1063204.48 $ lo6,397.23 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 18619 , Boyle Engineering, Engr. & Survey, 7-2C-1, 7-2C-2, 7-2D-43 7-2D-5 & 7-2D-6 $ 1,164.00 18620 Galy Construction Corp. , Connection Permits 431.00 18621 City of Santa Ana, Reimburse for overpayment on 7-1F-B 4,253.85 18622 Tustin Element-ary School Dist. , Reimbursement Agrm. Pymt . 13926.96 $ 7,775.81 $ 116,187.57 DISTRICT NO. 11 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 18623 Keith and Associates, Engr. . Relocation of Portion of Newland Ave. Pump Station Force Main $ 35811.13 _C- i J , RESOLUTION ITO. 72--102 ASSURANCES TO ENVIROMTLEITTAL• PROTECTION AGENCY REGARDING D�IPROVED TRLAT7i ,;NT A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TliE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SA11ITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 25 35 53 65 75 AND 11, DECLARIiIG INTENT TO INITIATE CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES FOR I141PROVED DEGREE OF TREATMENT W=REAS, the United States Environmental Protection Agency by letter dated July 17, 1972, as a condition precedent to offering of federal financial assistance for future wastewater treatment plant construction, has requested that these Districts submit a resolution which will establish a time schedule for a program to provide improved treatment at the Joint works, including dates for completing design, arranging financing, and starting construction; and, ti:HEREAS, it is now, and has been the policy of the Boards of Directors -of these Districts to comply with all valid laws, both State and Federal, with respect to the treatment and disposal. of wastewater generated within the Districts; and, WHEREAS, this policy has been successfully carried out in the past resulting in the maximum benefit to the users of the Pacific Ocean adjacent to Orange County as well as to the taxpayers of the Districts . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the Boards of Directors of these Districts will, by July 1, 1975, initiate construction of facilities which will meet or exceed the levels of wastewater treatment required by State and Federal laws in effect at the time construction is initiated. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That every effort will be employed by the Boards of Directors 1 of these Districts to implement as soon as possible a comprehensive program to control at the source the entrance of certain critical components into the Districts ' sewer systems togeti-ier with adequate surveillance, control and enforcement measures . Agenda Item #11 (a) D-1 All Districts BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That every effort will be employed 'by the Boards of Directors of these Districts to comply with the timetable of said construction, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A" which is hereby made a part of this resolution. Agenda Item #11 (a) D-2 All Districts Exhibit "A" to RESOLUTION NO. 72--102 `.r COMPLETE ARRANGE START COMPLETE PROJECT DESIGN FINANC I ,TG CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION 46 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 1 5/l/73 5/l/73 7/1/73 7/l/75 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 5/1/74 5/1/74 7/1/74 7/1/76 75 I,iGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 5/l/75 5/l/75 7/1/75 7/1/77 Agenda Item #11 (a) D-3 All Districts J RESOLUTION NO. 72-103 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF LICENSE TO OCCUPY RIGHT OF WAY AGREEMENT WITH TED NAKASE AKID GARY NAKASE, A PARTNERSHIP, BA NAKASE BROTHERS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 13 23 33 5, 63 75 AND 115 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF LICENSE TO OCCUPY RIGHT OF WAY AGREEMENT WITH TED NAKASE AND GARY NAKASE, A PARTNERSHIP, DBA NAKASE BROTHERS The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos . 1, 2, 3, 53 63 7, and - ll, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AI,TD ORDER: Section 1. That the certain License to Occupy Right of Way Agreement , dated August 1, 1972, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That County Sanitation District No. 1, as agent for itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos . 2, 3, 53 63 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, is hereby authorized and directed to enter into said agreement granting Nakase Brothers the right .to occupy and grow nursery stock on the District ' s .right of way along the Santa Ana River Channel in the vicinity of Adams Avenue; and, Section 3. That said agreement shall provide for a. $300 per annum fee, payable yearly to District No. 1, in advance; and, Section 4 . That the General Manager be authorized and directed to execute said License to Occupy Right of Way Agreement, in form acceptable to the District ' s General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 9, 1972. Agenda Item #12(a) -E- All Districts i f i B I D T A B U L A T I O N S H E E T Date : August 4 , 19172 11: 00 a.m. Contract For : One (1 ) Truck-Mounted Hydraulic Sewer Cleaner Specification No . A-062 BIDDER TOTAL BID 1. Southwest Flexible Co. 6029 Slauson Avenue $17.9376 . 37 Culver City, California 2. International Harvester Co. 1110 East Katella Avenue 18, 326 . 18 Anaheim, California 3° Ray Gaskin Service 300 W. Duarte Road 18.1439 . 89 Monrovia, California ' 4. McCoy Ford Company 1600 West Lincoln 193,023. 94 Anaheim, California 5. Woods GMC 1710 South Anaheim Boulevard 19,574 . 10 Anaheim, California 6. Peck Ford 2450 Kella Avenue 19, 770. 36 Whittier, California 7• Anaheim Dodge 1120 South Anaheim Blvd. (Truck Only) 7,638. 33 Anaheim, California It is recommended that award be made to Southwest Flexible Company, 6029 Slauson Avenue , Culver City, California, the lowest and best bidder. W. Clarke Maintenance Superintendent Agenda Item #12(b) -F- All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 72-105 ORDERING VALUE OF ABANDONED OR REMOVED STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT' REMOVED FROM BOOKS OF ACCOUNT A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS . 13 2, 3, 53 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE VALUE OF CERTAIN ABANDONED OR REMOVED STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT REMOVED FROM THE DISTRICTS ' BOOKS OF ACCOUNT The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos . 13 2, 33 5, 63 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, certain jointly-owned capital improvements during the course of expansion of treatment and disposal facilities, are from time to time abandoned or demolished and are no longer required for the purposes of the Districts; and, WHEREAS, conformance to generally accepted accounting principals and procedures require that assets disposed of be removed from the accounting records, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AND ORDERED THAT: The certain jointly-owned structures and equipment set forth and summarized on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution, are hereby formally abandoned and the value thereof is hereby ordered removed from the Districts ' Books of Account effective June 30, 1972. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 9, 1972 . Agenda Item #12(d) G-1 All Districts Exhibit "A" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ITEMIZATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF COST OF JOINTLY OWNED STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT ABANDONED as of JUNE 30, 1972 STRUCTURES & FACILITIES ABANDONED OR ELIMINATED Section 3 of 1951 JOS Section 1 Purchase Maintenance and operating supplies included in purchase price $161427. 63 - ' Outfall Chlorination Station, Wet Well and Chlorinator 22,584 . 40 Raw Sewage Pump 9, 316 . 44 Headworks Bar Screens 1�117. 80 $ 493446. 27 Contract Pl-1 of Sedimentation Basins 3 & 4 Pump Room Piping replaced under contract P1-5 $ 93107. 25 2 Sludge Pumps 63460. 00 Motor Control Center 2,500. 00 18,067. 25 Contract Pl-2 Digester 5' s Ajax Boiler and Heating System $15, 295 . 00 4" Flowmeter 22625. 00 173920. 00 Contract P1-3 0° of Headworks Incinerator 17,489. 81 Contract P2-8-3 Utility Building demolition ll,875. 00 Contract P2-11 Sedimentation Basins .A B & C Grit Washers 12, 540: 00 $127, 338. 33 DISTRIBUTION OF EQUITY TO DISTRICTS 1 $ 123772 . 04 2 393436. 67 3 41,665. 10 5 15614 . 83 6 7,563. 89 7 93155 . 64 11 93130. 16 $1273338. 33 Agenda Item #12(d) G-2 All Districts .. . 1 iU .,.';:1 '� 1 . .i 11.,i J ._ �> C::• �.. .t,.:f' 1.Cv. 1 P. 0. BOX 51'1•5 �• 10 l!'Y`f:l l i ;:err�. u` Fountain Valley, ca l i fornia 92708 CHANGE ORDER . . C.O. NO . 4 COTIT;tP;CTOR : B. H. MILLER CQ_'STKUCTIOIT COP PA14Y DATE:- - A,_iau st 9; 1972 JOB:_ Administration-En 1ineer.ing Building Addition, Job I,10.* J 7-2 `.r Amount of this change order (ADD) $ In accordance with contract provisions , . the folloi-iing changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as corloensation therefor, the follo;•,ing additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. - REFERENCE District Correspondence Dated:- May 24, 19725 May 25, 1972, May 26, 1972 _ June 2, '1972; June 2, 1972, June 2, 1972 June. 6*, 1972, June 6, 1972; June 7; 1972 June 12, 1972; June 15, 1972, June 15, • 1972, June 19, 197.2, June 19; 19725 June 19, 19723 June. 19; 1972, June 21, 1972' June-- 27, 1972, - June 27, 1972, June 283 1972, July 73 -19725 July 13, 1972 , Contractor Correspondence Dated: kstimates for- Change Orders Nos . 3 135 14 Rev.-, 15, 165 17, 20, 21, 23, 245 25 May 16, 1972, June 2, 1972, June 16, 1972,. June 19, 1972, June• �26, 1972, June 27, 1972. June 29., 1972,: June -305 1972, July 55 1972 Documents*-, -Drawings of Room R-15, Redlined; Revised Sheet 7.7, Detail ti; • Drawings CS-15 2 & 3,•' Revised Sheet 7. 5; Free Standing • Shelving Draiings; �,dadsirorth Cabinetry Invoice; Drawings -4, Rev. 2;. A-5, Rev. 2: A-10, Rev. 2; E-3; Rev. 4; . ADD Install additional vinyl _flooring at the under- . srtairwa.y storage areas • .ADD 109. 25 Relocate central vacuum unit to mechanical room - ADD 63: 14 Install added drawer units, at credenzas, self- , edged counter ends, and added end units to - • accommodate plan holders. - ADD 263. 35 Provide 30 square yards extra. carpet . ADD 251.85 Provide added Cushion Air Deluxe -.pa.dding ' ADD -357-.78 **Moe Chang,::, 3-dra.wer credenzas to 2:-file drawer' - - units ADD 345,00 Patch masonry in Room R-16 • ADD 40.o0 Install vinyl panels with alwriinum trim at all plan racks . ADD 657.8o Agenda Item. #12(e) H-1 All Districts COLINTY S:::;I T;iT I O:� D I S T R I C T S 01 0Rj%`,G is COU;:TY ' P. 0. Box 3127 - 100844 t:Zlis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 02708 C1IA: GI; ORDER C.O. 'No. 4 C.0itTRACTOR.- B. Ii. MILLER CONST?iL.CTIOI,? CO A-PA?;Y DATE =�>? �z t� ' 72 n:in.istral iorl-I'n j.riec=r,.rig )Li.L ding Addltio n, T'�b lo. ?-7-2 4CD (Continued) install new ceiling the throughout existing Administration Building ADD $ 546. 25 Rework undisclosed tra.nsite duct at interior column and add new structural beam at reception area ADD 149. 50 Install 2-36-inch free standing cabinets in Xerox Room, formica faced cabinets in kitchen, provide new range Hood in kitchen, revise cabinets in kitchen, add new cabinet faces in kitch-en, add handrail brackets and provide finish car_aentry to complete above kitchen work ADD 715.08 Cover rolling plan rack tops with laminated plastic and add 'ha.rd-ware at elevator mechanical roo required by Division of Industrial Safety. ADD 202. 86 Repair roofing at existing Administration Building ADD 661.25 • TOTAL ADD $4,363.11 DEDUCT Delete wood fence on roof at air conditioners TOTAL DEDUCT 4M.00 TOTAL ADD FOR THIS CHANGE ORDER $32 G57. 11 EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME Due to the above extra work the contractor is hereby granted an extension of contract time of 71 ca:lendar days S1,1!,2-1A,Y OF COTITRAC'�' �1'Ir IE Orig Cont-•ac z mate October 15, 1571 Original Contract Time 210 calendar days Original Completion Date May 125 1972 Time Extension C. O. -#2 & 3 93 calendar days Time Extension This Change Order 71 calendar days Total Extension of Contract Time 164 calendar days Revised Contract Time 374 calendar days Revised Completion Date October 23, 1J72 Original Contract Price _7750v 20 Prev. Muth. Changes 11 ,67-�. 47 This Change (ADD) (IIR ACT) $ ySZ. lz Amended Contract Price s 493,130. ;8 Board authorization date : Approved: August 9, 1972 COUNTY SA I TAT I O:d DISTRICTS of B. H. MILLER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Orange Coun::y, California By By Chief Agenda Item '12 (e) H-2 All Distr?.^.`:s • . 0 1/2? ` , �_ sir Fountain Valley, California 92708 CNLAr1GE ORDER C.0 NO . CONTRACTOR : E.T. I. & KOPDICX, A Joint Venture DATE: August 9. 1972 r 'T0B: HEAD,NTORKS "C" E PA:�:Si011 AT PLAi.T =TO. 2, JOH : 0. P2-11-1 Amount of this change order (ADD) (-MDVCr -,) $ 15,779. 87 In accordance with contract provisions , the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved . REFERENCE: Districts ' correspondence dated Feb 29, 1972 March 6 1972, March 7, 1972, March 31, 1972 April 1�, 1972, June 21, 1972, June 27, 1972 July 55 1972, July 18, 1972 Contractor' s correspondence dated Feb. •10, 1972, February 10, 1972., March 24, 1972, June 13, 1972, June 20, 1972, July 14 1972 . Documents - Detailed Specifications, March 20, 1972 FRESH AIR VEDITILATION SYSTEi.' FOR J0B l0. P2-11-15 Drawing 15A, JCE drawings dated Feb. 25, 1972, 3 competitive bids for Duct modifications ADD ' Install additional 10-foot x 12-foot equipment' access doorway in- Headworks "C" with aluminum rolling door ADD 25229.00 Under force account provisions install additional waterstop and repair existing waterstop at di's-- charge channel grit chamber openings Add *. ' 2,414.00 . Complete "FRESH AIR .DUCT IYIODIFICATIONS" to the. air. ducting system in Headworks "C" Add 73833.80 Lengthen reinforced plastic mortar pipe vent tie and steel casing from Headworks "i�" to Headworks "C" _ _.. -Add 1,650.oo Flighting on the grit washer and. transfer conveyors shall be 3/8-inch in lieu of the 1/4-inch originally specified Add 1,653.07 TOTAL ADD $155779.87 hi'ENSION OF CONTRACT TIME Due to the requirements of the extra work indicated above the contractor is hereby granted an extension of contract time of 30 calendar days. Agenda Item #12(f) I-1 All Districts UUU.i1 1 �>A-e1 1ioI t :t 11 151 1 U:• i):':1',ul: I.UU 11. 0. Box 312.7 - 10c-14 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Caliroriiia 91708 CIIA.NGE ORI)i R C.O. NO. 3 OO:%'T.RACT02: E.T. I 8c KORDICK A Joint Venture ,72 DATE Au.<�,�Ut � - `_ JOB KEADWOI0 KS "C" EXPA SIOi`1 AT PLANT 1,10. 2, JOB NO. P2-'11-1 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TI-'�E Original Contract Date October 15, 1971 Original Contract Completion Time 450 calendar days Original Completion Date January 7, 1973 Time Extension Previous Change Orders 21 calendar days Time Extension This Change Order 30 calendar days Total Extension of Contract Time 51 calendar days Revised Contract Completion Date February 27, 1973 Original Contract Price 0228 400.00 Prev. Auth. Chanties $ 641L 4.QO This Change (:1DD) ;IIiDl ) $ 15.7703 . 87 Amended Contract Price S 12 250, 523. 87 _ Bold authorization date : Approved: COUNTY SAN I TAT I O:4 DISTRICTS of August 9, l97•2 Orange County, California E.T.I. & KORDICK By - Chief l:nainee. By - Agenda Item #12(f) I--2 All Districts i RESOLUTION NO. 72-107-11 ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT ANNEXATION NO. 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 113 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, HUNTINGTON HARBOUR ANNEXATION NO. 4 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to County Sanitation District No . 11 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a petition filed by the property owner; and, Section 2. That, pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganiza- tion Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of said territory to C.ounty Sanitation District No . 11 by- means of Resolution No . 72-48-i1, filed with said Commission by the District; and, Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Huntington Harbor Annexation No . 4 to County Sanitation District No . 11 (Annexation No . 16 )" , the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 4 . That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and, *4000 Section 5. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and, Section 6 . That provision for payment of annexation fees in the amount of $462 . 00 have been satisfied; and, Agenda Item .#23 J-1 District 11 i Section 7 . That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described hereinabove, be and it is hereby ordered annexed to County Sanitation District No . 11 without notice or hearing and without election. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 9, 1972. Agenda Item #23 J-2 District 11 Mel Gorhana Elect Co. Commercial A DIVISION OF MEL GORHAM,INC. Industrial GENERAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS Remodels P.O. BOX 9857 • SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92109 488-2822 • 276-5430 4 August 1972 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. BOX 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Attention: Mr. Ray E. Lewis, Deputy Chief Engineer Subject: Contract #P-2-20 Power Reliability Project at Plant #2 Gentlemen: In reference to your letter of 3 August 1972, -it is perfectly agreeable to us and we will accept a "post" dated contract on the above project as long as all other terms are as stated in your request for bids,specifications and in our subsequent bid. Please forward contract documents at your convenience with instructions of how you wish us to proceed. Looking forward to a pleasant association, I remain Very truly yours, MEL GORHAM ELECTRIC COMPANY J Wisong eneral Manager JW/kb cc: Doug Hayes For Better Service Call Gorham Electric Co. Agenda Item ,#29 (a) -K- District 1 -Engineer ' s Estimate : $350J000 . BID TABULATION S H E E T Date June 15 , 1972 - 11 : 00 A.M. Contract For: POV,ER I:ELIABILITY PROJECT AT PLAi�T ill V . 2 JOB' NO. P2-20 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1• Mel Gorham Electric Company San Diego, California $158 , 294 2. Freeman Electric Construction Company Long Beach 1694261 3, Divelcon ' Stanton 169, 320 4. Snead Electric Company Los Angeles 178 , 700 5. Lord Electric Company, Inc. Paramount 181,369 6 Allen Electric Company . Orange 192 ,100 7. Signal dill Electric Inc. Long Beach 211, 875 8. Reichel Electric Inc. Westminster 232 ,000 10. 11 . . Agenda Item #29 (b ) -L- District 1 RESOLUTION NO. 72-104 APPROVING AWARD OF JOB NO. P2-203 POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT PLANT NO. 2 � A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AWARD OF POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-20 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts No. 1, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1 . That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by John Carollo Engineers, Districts ' engineers, and concurred in by the Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to Mel Gorham Electric Company, a corporation, for POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT PLANT NO. 23 JOB NC. P2-20, and the tabulation of bids and the proposal for said work, are hereby received and 'ordered filed; and, Section 2. That- award of contract to Mel Gorham Electric Company, a corporation, in the total amount of $158 ,294 . 00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, be approved; and, Section 3. That the contract date for said work be established as September 18, 1972; and, Section 4 . That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor; and, Section 5. That all other bids received for said work are �.r hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 9, 1972 . Agenda Item #29(b) -M- District 1 RESOLUTION NO. 72-108 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 1-13 '�■� A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 15 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR NEW SIPHON, GREENVILLE-SULLIVAN TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 1-13 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No . l,. of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering, District ' s engineers, for construction of New Siphon, Greenville-Sullivan Trunk, Contract No . 1-13, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11: 00 a.m. , August 24 , 1972, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4 . That the Secretary of the Board and the District ' s engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of District No. 1; and, Section 5. That the General Manager is hereby authorized to award contract for said Contract No. 1-13 to the lowest responsible bidder; and, Section 6 . That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said lowest responsible bidder for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 9 , 1972 . Agenda Item #30 -N- District 1 RESOLUTION NO. 72-115 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM A. J. GISLER The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No . 13 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated July 11, 1972, wherein A. J. Gisler et al . grants to County Sanitation District No. 1, a permanent easement for sewer purposes (Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 1, Contract No . 7-6-1 ) through certain real property situated in the County of Orange, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by General Counsel; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 4 . That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 9, 1972 . Agenda Item #32 (a) -0- Districts 1 & 7 RESOLUTION NO. 72-116 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF QUITCLAIM DEED A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF QUITCLAIM DEED The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No . 1, of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That there is an error in the legal description -of an easement acquired from A. J. Gisler et al. for part of the Sunflower Interceptor (Reach 1, Contract No. 7-6-1) ; and, Section 2. That it is in the best interests of the District to exchange said incorrectly described easement for a correctly described easement; and, Section 3. That the Chairman of the District be authorized and directed to execute a Quitclaim Deed, quitclaiming the District ' s interest in that certain real property shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto upon receipt by the District of a Grant of Easement from A. J. Gisler et al. containing a legal description of the required easement relative to construction on County Sanitation Districts Nos . 1 and 7 of the Sunflower Interceptor (Reach 1, Contract No. 7-6-1) . Said deed is to be approved by the General Counsel as to form and content . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held -August 9 , 1972. Agenda Item #32 (b ) -P- Districts 1 & 7 S&S Construction Co. A Subsidiary of Wilshire-San Vicente Plaza Shapell Industries, Inc. Suite 700 8383 Wilshire Boulevard August 4, 1972 Beverly Hills,California 90211 213 655 7330 Orange County Sanitation District u3• 10844 Ellis rvenue Fountain. Valley, California 92708 Attn: Mr. John' Sigler R-%: lltstudmter Village Pro j ect-x'�nnexation Dear Mr. Sigler: Please consider this a realest for our Z-Testr. ester �Tilla e Project to be annex-ed officially to Crane County Sanitation District 43. rMe annexation maps and legal description will be fort-arded to your office prior to A rjus t 11, 1972. 5m required annexation fee i-ri11 also be fore,.,arded to vour_ office prior. to Ai rust 11, 1972. Thank you for your cooiperation in this matter. Yours very truly, S & S WNSTR=ON CGNPFrn Elias Jo n Garcia Assistant Vice President EJG: do cc: T. 7508 T. 7746 T. 7438 T. 7747 T. 7545 T. 7574 cc: I Ir. George Same-- V T N - 2 301 Ca=us Drive 24ewport Peach, California 92664 LJJ County S :sit-4-ion Districis cf 0= V Agenda Item #37 Q-1 District 3 S&S Construction Co. A Subsidiary of Wilshire-San Vicente Plaza Shapell Industries, Inc. Suite 700 8383 Wilshire Boulevard Beverly Hills,California 90211 July 20, 1972 213 655 7330 Orange County Sanitation District %o. 3 10844 Ellis P,venue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attn: Mr. Kaiser V7est T inter Village . Dear I✓r. Kaiser Enclosed is a check in the amount of $325.CO, payable to County Sanitation District f 3 of Orange County. This check represents the required processing deposit for our annexation of V;estminster Village to the District. P_ legal description and Tip Hill follow in the near future. All the property is currently ak%ned L-y �-Ioodbine Corporation and no voters reside in the area. Yours very truly, S & S 00NSTRDC.`I (X1 CU PP'M Elias John Garcia Assistant Vice President EJG: do `.r enclosures cc: T. 7545 T. 7574 T. 7438 T. 7508 T. 7746 T. 7747 Agenda Item #37 Q- 2 District 3 November 55, 1971 M r. Wayne Sylvester County Sanitation Districts of Orange Counts/ 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: It has come to our attention that our tentative Tracts 7438 and 7508 are not annexed to Orange County Sanitation District No. 3. Please consider this a request for annexation to Orange County Sanitation District No. 3. No one currently.resides within the subject areas. Wood- bine Corporation is the legal owner, Woodbine Corporation is a subsidiary of Shapell Industries and is located within our offices. Your immediate attention to this annexation request will be greatly apprec- iated. Enclosed for your convenience are copies of both tentative tracts. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Yours very truly, S}-fAPELL INDUSTRIES, INC. Elias John Garcia Direcbr of Engineering cc: Tract 7508 Tract 7545 Tract 7438 Midway City Sanitation District 14451 Cedarwood St. , Westminster, Calif. 92683 VTN - 2301 Campus Drive,Newport Beach, Calif. 92664 Mr. George Saupe 8857 WEST OLYMPIC BOULEVARD BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA 9021 1 ( 213 ) 655-7330 Agenda Item #37 -R- District 3 RESOLUTION NO. 72-106-3 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF TEMPROARY RENTAL AGREEI���EN T tiv ITH JO SEPI-i R. CALLE14S A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 33 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF TEMPORARY RENTAL AGREEMENT WITH JOSEPH R. CALLENS The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No . 3, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Temporary Rental Agreement, dated August 4, 1972, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That County Sanitation District No . 3, of Orange County, California, is hereby authorized and directed to enter into said agreement with Joseph R. Callens relative to right of way in connection with construction of Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1, and Reaches 2 and 3, Contract No . 3-17 ,for temporary rental of real property as described in said agreement ; and, Section 3. That payment for crop damages in the amount of $950 . 00 and for rental in an amount not to exceed $3,150 .00, for the period August 7, 1972, through November 6, 1972 , is hereby authorized; and, Section 4 . That the General Manager be authorized and directed to execute said Temporary Rental Agreement, in form approved by District ' s General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 9, 1972 . Agenda Item #38 -S- District 3 .RESOLUTION NO. 72-109-3 IZIII, 1I C0 OINAUTHOPG CONDE� NAON IN l"NECTI WITH KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACT NO. �.r 3_17 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 , OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPPERTY SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RE: KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, A PORTION OF REACH 1, AND REACHES 2 & 3, CONTRACT NO. 3-17 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1 . That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 , of Orange County, California, has found and determined, and hereby- does find and determine , that the public interest and necessity require for public use the acquisition, construction, completion, operation and maim-enance by said County Sanitation District of certain public improvements, to wit: A sanitary sewer and all facilities and appurtenances necessary or incidental thereto including manholes, measuring devices, pumping stations, and other structures for the trans- porting and receipt of sewage and industrial wastes for the purpose of transportation, treating and disposing of said sewage and industrial wastes arising within the territories of said County Sanitation District and such other territories as said District may have contracted to serve pursuant to law; and that certain real property situated in the County of Orange, State of California, is necessary therefor. Section 2. That the real property, the acquisition of which is required by the public interest and necessity for the uses and purposes set forth in Section 1 hereof, is situated in the County of Orange, State of California, and is more particularly described on Schedule "A" and shown on maps marked Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof --'.s though set out in ful� herein. Agenda Item #39 T-1 District 3 Section 3 . That the permanent easements and rights of way above described and necessary to be acquired shall be acquired subject to the rights of the owners, their successors and assigns, to use the surface of the land within the boundary lines of such easements and rights of .gray to the extent compatible with the full and free exercise of said easements and rights of way; provided, however, that: (a) No building or structure of any kind shall be placed, erected or maintained thereon; (b) No streets, alleys nor roadways shall be constructed upon, over, or along said ease- ments and rights of way to a grade less than four feet above the top of any pipe or pipes located within the lines of said easements or rights of way; (c) No fill shall be placed or maintained over the surface of the ground as it shall exist within the lines .of said easements and rights of way upon the completion of the improvements to be constructed therein greater than six feet in depth. Section 4. That the permanent easements and rights of way to be acquired shall include : (a) The right to construct manholes, air valves, blowoffs, pumping wells, pumping stations, metering stations, standpipe and service connection structures appurtenant to said line or lines of trunk sewer pipe, which �r structures shall not extend above the surface of the ground; - (b) The right during construction to use all existing private roads within the properties of the owners for ingress to and egress from Agenda Item ;' �9 T-2 District 3 the work, together with the right, upon .completion of the construction of the pipe- line or pipelines or other works, to con- struct and maintain an access road upon, over, and along such permanent easements and rights of way as may be in the public interest from time to time. Section 5. That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 , of Orange County, California, hereby declares its intention to acquire the property described in Section 2 hereof by proceedings in eminent domain. That the law firm of Miller, . .Nisson and Kogler, 2.014 North Broadway, Santa Ana, California, be and it is hereby authorized and directed to commence an action - in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Orange in the name and on behalf of County Sanitation District No. 3 , of Orange County, California, against all owners and claimants of the above-described properties for the purpose of condemning and acquiring said properties for the use of said County Sanitation District; that said condemnation action shall be prosecuted in accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. That said attorneys are authroized and instructed to make application to said Court for an order fixing the amount of security by way of money deposits as said Court may direct and for an order permitting County Sanitation District No. 3 , of Orange County, California, to take immediate possession and use of said real property for the uses and purposes herein described. Section 6. That the Auditor of the District is authorized upon receipt of a Court order and demand from C. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel of the District, to pay to the County Clerk of the County of Orange such sum or sums of money from District funds as may be required from time to time to be deposited upon order of the Court granting immediate possession of easements and rights of way to the District. PASSED AND, ADOPTED at a regular mPating held August 9, 197? . Agenda Item #39 T-3 District 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 of Orange County, California ADDENDUM NO. 1 to CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS AND PLANS PACIFIC COAST HIGHj`AY FORCE MAIN CONTRACT NO. 5-19 July 26 , 101,72 I. PROPOSAL Bidders are required to list the names of the pipe manufacturer (s) who will furnish the 18" and 24" pressure pipe. to be used in the work. If more than one manufacturer is to be used , all manufac- turers) shall be listed with the portion to be furnished indicated. The following list shall be attached to the proposal when submitted: ALTERNATE LINEAL FOOTAGE PIPE MANUFACTURER NO. SIZE TO BE FURNISHED II . DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS Section 14-04 B. 2 . a. Change second sentence of first paragraph to read as follows: "The pipe shall_ be designed for an internal working pressure of 150 psi and the depth of cover indicated on the plans . " Section 14-04 B. 2 .b. (1) (a) Delete paragraph and add the following: "Pipe Udall - The resin shall be Type II polyester with or without inorganic filler. " Agenda Item #44 U-1 District 5 ADDENDUM NO. 1 - CONTRACT NO. 5-19 Page 2 of 3 Section 14-04 B. 2 .e. (2) Change hydrostatic proof test from 200 psi to 340 psi- for 24" pipe and to 450 psi for 18" pipe. Section 14-04 B. 2 . e. (3) (a) Change the load to fail for ultimate hoop tensile strength from 5120 to 8190 pounds per inch of width for. 24 " pipe and to 6140 for 18" pipe. Section 14-05. Valves Delete Section and add the following: "The Contractor shall furnish and install all valves as shown and specified. All valves shall be new and of current manufacture. All 4-inch , 12-inch , 18-inch , and 24-inch valves shall be* non-lubricated eccentric plug type having rubber- faced plugs , designed for a water wo.r_hing pressure of not less than 125 psi . . The 12-inch, 18-inch and 24-inch valves shall be DeLurik 118F G16 with 2-inch square operating nuts . -The 4-inch valves shall be DeZurik 101 *F G6 . `.i'he 10-inch valve shall be a solid wedce , bronze trimmed , iron body, flanged, Class 125-, non-rising stern, with hand wheel similar to Crane ' s Figure 461 , or approved equal . All actuating nuts shall extend to within 6-inches- of the valve box cover. Valve box extensions and covers shall be centered about the actuating nuts and their extensions . The flanges of valves may be raised or plain faced and shall be faced and drilled to conform with ANSI B 16 . 5 . Each valve body shall be tested under a test pressure equal to twice its design water working pressure. Shop drawings of all valves shall be submitted in accordance with Section 7-5 of the General Provisions . " Section 16-03 B. Add the following paragraph: = "After completion of the backfill, the deflection of the pipe shall be determined by comparing the diameter of the in-place pipe with the diameter prior to placement of bedding or backfill. If the diameter has changed more than 0. 5-inch, the pipe shall be removed and replaced. " 7/26/72 Agenda Item #44 U-2 District 5 i ADDENDUM NO. 1 - CONTRACT NO. 5-19 Page 3 of 3 III. DRAWINGS The following changes denoted "delta" 1 have been made to the ,drawings: Sht: No. Description of Change 6 Changed 27" .plug valves to 24" and added 2 - 27" x 24" reducers . 12 Replotted grade line between Station 98+16 and Station 101+05 . Added underground T.V. cable. 16 Changed details of vault and 10 " valve outlet on 12" line .. 17 Added underground T.V. cable . 20 Changed location' of valve vault adjacent to Rocky Point Pun:pir_g Station . Changed 12 " gate valves to plug valves . 7/26/72 Agenda Item #44 U-3 District 5 B I D T A B U L A T I O N S H E E T Eng. Est. $783,100.00 August 13 (972 oR CONTRACT FOR: Sewer Trunk "B" - Unit 8 - Pacific Coast' Highwa.y Force Main cv Contrast No. 5-19 �1 CONTRACTOR BASE BID ALTERNATE 2. A ALTERNATE .A TOTAL PRICE w `1 — H A. J. Tutor, Inc . & N. M. Saliba Co. Ct North Hollywood $578,500.00 $65,400.00 $343600.00 $6783500.00 n � 2. Galla.cher Company, Inc . Costa Mesa 676,164.0o 83,431 .00 30,716.o0 790,311.00 3. Mark Dakovich, Inc. Brea 663,508.00 755292.00 6o,750.00 7993550.00 +' Kordick & Son, Inc. 817,295.CO Baldwin Park 723,130.00 69,000.00 25,165.00 817,012.00 5. Tab Construction, Inc. I.as Vegas 715,753.00 68,197.00 35,630.00 819, 580.00 0' Vito Artukovich & Sons South E1 Monte 7775829.00 59,051.00 20,000.00 856,880.00 7 R. L. Thibodo Const. Co. , Inc. San Marcos 778,685.00 50,800.00 29,000.00 858,485.00 Anro Construction South El Monte 863,000.00 46,000.00 11,000.00 920,000.00 9. Ecco Contractors, Inc. Santa. Ana 826.1871.00 765200.00 46,700.00 949,771.00 10. 11. Corrected addition 1.2. rt .� n •f T RESOLUTION NO. 72-110-5 APPROVING AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. 5-19 SEWER TRUINK "B" - UIvIT T-- PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY FORCE 1,1AIi3 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AWARD OF SEWER TRUNK "B" - UNIT 8 - PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY FORCE MAIN, CONTRACT NO. 5-19 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Shuirman-Simpson, District ' s Consulting Civil Engineers, and concurred in by the Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to A. G. Tutor Company, Inc . & N. M. Saliba Company, for SEWER TRUNK "B" - UNIT 8 - PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY FORCE MAIN, CONTRACT NO. 5-19, and the tabulation of bids and the proposal for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2 . That. aw.ard of contract to A. G . Tutor Company, Inc . & N. M. Saliba Company, in the total amount of $678, 500. 00 , in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, be approved; and, Section 3. That the .Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor; and, Section 5. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 9, 1972 . Agenda Item #45 -W- District 5 • LOCAL AGENCY FOR�LkTION COMISSION P. 0. Box 687 Santa Ana, California Phone : 834--2239 MEMORANDUM July 31, 1972 T0: Sanitation Districts of Orange County Box 8127 Fountain Valley,. California FROM: Richard T. Turner, Executive Officer RE: Proposed annexation to the Irvine Ranch Water District designated Annexation No. 16 Pursuant to its Bylaw No. 32, the Ducal Agency formation Commission of Orange County requests your report on the advisability, in terms of the general public interest, regarding the factors named in Government Code Section 54'796 as they relate to the special concern of your agency. Copies of the "Justification of Proposal" and map are attached. This proposal has been set for hearing before this Commission, August 23, 1972 and the Commission would therefore appreciate receipt of your .report no later than August 11, 1972 . The report should be delivered to the Secretary of the Commission, County Administration Building, 515 North Sycamore Street, Room 101, Santa Ana. If you feel the importance of the proposal from the point of view of your agency makes it advisable to continue the hearing to a later date in order to allow time for further study, please furnisb an interim report so indicating, but containing your tentative advice on the proposal. J . Richard T. Turner Executive Officer F 2074-5 Agenda Item 06 -X- District 5 UUUIV I T 5kf14 1 IA I I UN Utz:) I N I U I rq U. 0 BUDGET RECOMIMENDATIONS i r . 1972/73 FISCAL YEAR ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 1o8,932,450 EST. A.V. ADJUS i EtD FOR %DEI_I; Q. $ 103,485,828 EST. TAX RATE PER $ 100 OF A.V. $ No Tax Rate FUND #8 OPERATING ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE No Tax Rate �./ APPROVED APPROVED ! ESTIMATED �RECOMMENDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET 1970/71 1971/72* ;Exg�+ .1972/y3 Directors Fees 400 40o 1 125 600 I i Contractul Services - Share of Joint Operating 60.0 600 6o0 600 Professional Services 25900 2,350 ; 1,600 , Office Expense 150 150 Printing & Publication ; 500 f Travel & Meeting - Directors ' Mileage 100 100 1 15 i 100 Sub-Total 43150 3, 600 74o 3,4Oo . - L Unappropriated Reserve 362 .360 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 4,512 3, 960 3,400 i Less : Cash Carry-Over & Revenue Funds Available July 1 1 Budgeted Requirements 71/72 � 1 3,960tl � Actual Expenditures 71/72 7 3,220 Allowance for Accruals , Other Income & Transfers : 62 3 t � Cash Carry-over .4,362 3,817 3,282 3 33282 Interest &. Misc . Receipts 150 143 118 TOTAL CASH & REVENUE 45512 3,960 3, 00 AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES -0- -0- :I -0- t *Reclassified 1 i I � I - I 1 i Agenda Item #51 -Y - District 8 i E t f RESOLUTION NO. 72-112-7 ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT ANi?EX�'�TIOI1 �10. 29 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 73 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 73 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, PORTION OF TRACT 6967 ANNEXATION The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to County Sanitation District No. 7 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a petition filed by the majority property owners; and, Section 2 . That, pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganiza- tion Act of 1965 ) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of said territory to County Sanitation District No. 7 by means of Resolution No . 72-66-7, filed with said Commission by the District; and., Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Portion of Tract No . 6967 to County Sanitation District No . 7 (Annexation No . 29) ", the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 4 . That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and, Section 5. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and, Section 6. That provision for payment of annexation fees in the amount of $1, 869. 35 have been satisfied; and, Agenda Item #55 Z-1 District 7 Section 7 . That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to• Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965 ) of Title 6 of the Government Code, NOW Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described her. einabove, be and it is hereby ordered annexed to County Sanitation District No . 7 without notice or hearing and without election. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 9, 1972 . Agenda Item #55 Z-2 District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 72-113-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 , OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No . 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain Grant of Easement .dated August 4 , 19723 wherein an easement for sanitary sewer purposes is granted to County Sanitation District No. 7, is hereby accepted from Irvine Industrial Complex; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B" , attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said easement is granted in connection with construction of Jamboree Road Subtrunk No. 21 Reach 53, Contract No. 7-2D-6; and, Section 4. That said easement is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 9, 1972 . Agenda Item #56 -AA- District 7 T�� Clly 0� SflOTfl flOfl CALIFORNIA Please address replies to: July 20, 1972 Clerk of the Council 217 North Main Street Santa Ana, CA 92701 Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA WEST RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-5-1R; YOUR LETTER, JULY 10, 1972 At its regular meeting held on July 17, 1972, the City Council considered the subject request. The Council concurred with the general location of the proposed West Relief Trunk Sewer, Sanitation District No. 7, as outlined in the subject letter. Council also authorized the transfer of $324, 000 from the City's County Sanitation District No. 7 Main Trunk Fund to District No. 7 for the construction of the West Relief Trunk Sewer as requested. Please call us if we may provide additional information on this matter. Florence I. Malone Clerk of the Council Agenda Item #98 -BB- District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 72-114-2 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 23 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTAION COMPANY The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No . 2, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated wherein Southern Pacific Transportation Company grants to County Sanitation District No. 2 the right to construct Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-14-1, through Southern Pacific Transportation Company right of way in the vicinity of Eighth Street in Santa Ana and southwesterly of and adjacent to the Santa Ana Freeway, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2 . That use of said right of way is at . no cost to the District; and, Section 3 . That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 9, 1972-. Agenda Item #63 -CC- District 2 i RESOLUTION NO. 72-117-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF v, EASEMENT FROM IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 73 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1-. That certain Grant of Easement dated August 4 , 19723 wherein an easement for sanitary sewer purposes is granted to County Sanitation District No. 7, is hereby accepted from Irvine Industrial Complex; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B" , attached hereto and Made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3 . That said easement is granted in connection with construction of Jamboree Road Subtrunk No. 1, Reach 47 , Contract No. 7-2C-2; and, Section 4 . That said easement is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 , be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 9, 1972 . Agenda Item #61(a) -DD- District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 72-109 ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-12 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 53, 65 73 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-12 AS COMPLETE The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 , 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, B. H. Miller Construction Company, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Vehicle Maintenance Facilities, Job No . J-12; and, Section 2. That by letter, William P. Ficker & Associates, Districts ' engineers , have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract ; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the Districts has concurred in said - engineers ' recommendation, which said recommenda- tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4 . That Vehicle Maintenance Facilities , Job No. J-12, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated October 15, 1971; and, Section 5 . That the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 9, 1972. Agenda Item #17 (a) -EE- All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 72-27 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE ORANGE COUi= WATER DISTRICT l MGD SECONDARY TREATED W=R FOR THEIR CLA14ATION FACILITY AID THE RIGHT TO DISCHARGE A LIKE AMOUNT TO SANITATION DISTRICT FACILITIES' A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 25 3, 53 65 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT TO PROVIDE 15 MGD SECONDARY TREATED WATER FOR ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT' S RECLAMATION FACILITY AND THE RIGHT TO DISCHARGE 15 MGD OF SALT BRINES A4D OTHER RESIDUAL MATERIAL TO SANITATION DISTRICT FACILITIES The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos . 15 23 3, 55 63 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain agreement dated August 9 , 19725 between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 25 33 55 65 7, and 11, of Orange County and Orange County Water District, to provide 15 mgd of secondary treated water for said Water District' s reclamation facility and the right for Water District -to discharge 15 mgd of salt brines and other residual material to Sanitation Districts ' facilities, is hereby approved and accepted;. and, Section 2. That County Sanitation District No. 1, acting as agent for itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 35 53 63 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, is hereby authorized to enter into said agreement with Orange County Water District; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 9 , 1972 . Agenda Item #17 (b ) -FF-- A11 Districts i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92703 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 August 9, 1972 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Fred A. Harper SUBJECT: Control Center Air Conditioning System Emergency Replacement The Control Center, which houses nearly one-half million dollars worth of electronic equipment , is climate controlled for the protection of this equipment against failure due to temperature and humidity variations . Many of the meters and telemetry devices are of solid state design and become erratic or break down completely when subjected to temperatures above 950 Fahrenheit . The existing air conditioning system was installed in 1962 and has had' some components replaced in 1968. It failed completely over the weekend of August 5th and 6th and upon investigation it was determined to be beyond repairs other than some very temporary measures which may extend its service two to three weeks . It is recommended that we be authorized to purchase replacement units after receiving competitive bids, in an amount not to exceed $10, 000. W. N. Clarke Maintenance Superintendent WNC: ss L• Agenda Item #17Cc ) -GG- All Districts COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 August 4, 1972 (714) 962-2411 M E M O R A N D U M TO: COMMITTEE ON THE RECENTLY-ADOPTED STATE POLICY Joint Chairman Robert Finnell Director Edward Just Chairman Lorin Griset Chairman Norman Culver Vice Chairman Jesse Davis Supervisor David Baker The attached material was just received in this morning' s mail. After reviewing same, the Committee may wish to meet prior to Tv.ednesday' s Joint Board meeting to consider this material. This information is being forwarded to the Board members, C �Zlod 44 Fred A. Harper General Manager FAH: j Enclosure cc: C. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel ,t r STA'IE OF CALIFORNIA - THE RESOURCES A(_T1 NCY STME- VIA TER RESOURCES COi`'IROL BOARD WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLAN) FOR ) Resolution tlo . OCEAN WAVERS OF CALIFORNIA) 72-45 PETITION FOR REHEARING ON BEHALF OF YZ SA I�7_C'�l�TI ON D.T.S`S' Y R TC T COME S NOW the (Sani to ti_on Dis tric t) (Addre ss) , and file s thi s Petition for Rehearing of the State Wa ter Resources Control Board ' s Resolution No. 72--45 establishing a S-later Quality Control Plan for the Ocean I a ters of California . While Re solution No . 72-45 has on its face a July G, 1972 date of adoption, no copies of the Board' s Resolution were made available for general public distribution until approximately one week (7 days) after the Board' s adloprion of the Resolution.. Accordingly , the effective date of the Board' s Resolution may be taken as July 13 , 1972 . (S);elly Oil C2M2 ny e t al , v . Phillips Pe t-..roIeuri ComL-)anILT 339 U. S. 667 , 683 (1950) This petition For Rehearing is accordingly filed within the 30-day period provided ior. review of the Board' s Resolution (California Water Code Section 13320) . INT'E'R.ST OF nTT (SANI`I'ATIOTNT DISTRICT) The (Sanita tion District) is the principal sewer and sanitation agency serving the (County) . The District serves an area of appro- ximately (0000) square miles , and a population of (0) million. The District' s facilities consist of (000) riles of sewer pipe- lines, together with rela-ted waste treatment plants , and othler facilities of an app oxima to value of $ (000) m.ill?_on. 71he Di: tr is t has a g._e sen t annual operating budget of appro:,,ima tely ($O) cni Ilion suor.\:="1 principally by revenc�es derived from ad valorem property taxes imposed upon residents and property owners of the District, and from resi_den- ~ tial , commercial , and industrial sewer service , and waste discharge fees. On an average day the District discharges (000) million gallons per day of sewage effluent and other wastes into the ocean, including an estimated (000) tons per day of suspended solids and other waste materials. These discharges are made through sewer ou tfal l and solids (sludge) lines extending (0) miles into the waters of (Named Bay) comprising part of the ocean waters of Calif- ornia . The Board' s Resolution establishing a Water Quality Plan for the Ocean Waters of California will have a serious, costly, and un- necessary impact on the District' s projected and future operations imposing large , unnecessary and unwarranted costs upon the District' s residents-- and property. owners. POSITION OF TlliE (SANITATION DISTRICT) Briefly, it is the position of the (Sanitation District) that the Board' s Water Quality Plan, as adopted , should be rescinded , and should only be re-adopted in substantially modified form. First , the Board' s Resolution and accompanying Plan constitute a "project" which requires the filing of a detailed envi.rontn ntal impact statement (pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21100) ; Seco.zd , the Board ' s Resolution and Plan sets forth no discussion of the alternatives to the Board ' s Plan , nor any evidentiary basis for the Board ' s adoption of its Resolution or supporting Plan; Third , the Board ' s Resolution and Plan sets forth no discussion of the cost of implcmanLi_ng the Resolution and Plan (as required under California Environmental Quality Act) ; and amour , The Board' s Resolution and Plan sets forth no evid n t iary basis supporting the specific limits on ocean discharges (for chromium, mercury, suspended solids , etc. ) adopted by the Boafd. . -2- Generally, the Board ' s Resolution and Plan is a mere statement of the Board' s conclusions (1) without any reference to any evidence before the Board supporting its conclusions, or (2) without any dis- cussion of the Board' s reasoning leading to its conclusions. without such evidentiary support the Board ' s Resolution and Plan cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the Board must rescind the present Resolution and Plan and hold such hearings, and take such evidence as may be necessary to support whatever modified Resolution and Plan which the circumstances warrant. Before doing so, the Board must issue a detailed environmental impact statement, consider the alternatives before it, and provide a tested evidentiary basis supporting any findings which it may then make . The Board' s Plan Requires the Filing of A De !f-iled Environmental Impact Statement At the outset, there is no dou tb t that the Board' s comprehensive plan consititutes a major "project" -which could have a" sign ificant effect" on the enviromen tal of the state , as set forth in the recently adopted Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code , Sections 21000, e t. seq. ) Thus, today , the Environmental Quality Act provides and declares that: It is the intent of the Legislature that all agencies of the state governmental which regulate activities of private individuals , corporations, and public agencies which are found to affect the quality of the environment, shall regulate such activities so that major consideration is given to preventing environmental damage . (Public Resources Code 21000 (g) (Emphasis supplied) ." In furtherance of these policies and this intent the Public Resources Code provides ,,All state agencies , boards, and commissions shall include in any report on any project they propose to carry out: which could have a significant effect on the tz:nvironment: of the state , a detailed stater,,ent by the responsible state official setting for th . . . -3- (a ) The environmental impact of the proposed action." See , Orange County Water District v_. State Water Resources -Control Eoard , Case No. 1,02462 .-1Suoerior Court, River- sidc County, filed May 25 , 1972 Desert Environment Conservation Association , et . al . v . California Public Utilities Cornm_ission Supreme Court, S. F . Case No. 22898, Petition granted July 5 , 1972 The Attorney General for the State of California has taken the position that the California Environmental Quality Act does apply to decisions of individual State boards and agencies (Brief of California Attorney General , Friends of Mammoth v . Mono County 3 Board of Supervisors) ' r In light of the expressions of public policy and legislative intent, there can be no doubt that the plain meaning of Public Resources Section 21100 requires the preparation and consideration of a "detailed statement" (sortie time referred to as an environmental impact report) before waste discharge requirements can be validly established , modified , or reviewed by a California Regional Water Quality Control Board or by the State Water Resources Control Board . If there were any doubt as to the validity of this conclusion , that doubt could be quickly resolved by reference to the National 1 . The attorney for the orange County Water Dis trio L is John J. Murphy , Rutan & Tucker , 401 Civic Ccntcr Drive West, San Ails+ , California 92702 , Telephone : (714) 835-2000. 2 . The attorney for the Desert Enviromental Conservation Association is John R. Phillips , Center for Law in the Public Interest , 10203 San Monica Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90067 , Telephone : (213) 879-5588 . 3 . The Deputy Attorney Gencral assigned to this proceeding is Mr . Nicholas C . Yost , 600 State Building, 217 Viest 1st Street, Los Angeles , California 90012 . Telephone: (213) 620-3175 . -4- Environmental .Polic:v Act (Public Taw 91-190; 83 Stat. 852) , after which the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 was patterned . Wilderness Society v. Hick, 325 F . Supp. 422 (D. C. Cir . ; ]_970) Department of Interior permit to construct trans-Alaska oil pipeline . Kalur v. Resor , 355 F . Supp. l (D . C . Cir , 1971) - issuance of water discharge permits under Re fu. se Act of 1899 Calvert Cliffs Coor_dinatinq Com_mi.ttee , _Inc . v . Atomic Energj Commission , 449 F 2d 1109 (D . C . Cir , 1971) The Board ' s Plan Requires A Discussion of The Alternatives To Be Considered. In adopting its Plater Quality Control Plan for the Ocean Waters of California , it is clear that , before adoption, the Board must appropriately consider the "alternatives" to the proposed action. The California Environment Quality Act is specific in this regard . Thus, the law requires that - the "detailed statement" set. forth "(d) Alternatives to the proposed action" (Public Resources Code , Section 21100) ." No such alternatives have been set forth by the Board , and the Board' s Resolution, and Plan, as adopted is therefore invalid until such a time as has been made an analysis of the alternatives to the Board ' s action. The Board ' s Resolution Requires An Analysis of The Cost of Implementing The Plan. In adopting its Water Quality Control Plan for the Ocean Waters of California , the Board must also consider the "costs and benefits" to be derived from the Board' s a c ti Qn. Again , the Environmental Quality Act of 1970 sets fort'll the policy of the State to: " (g) Require governmental agencies at: all leveIS, to consider qualitative fac'Lors as � ell as economic c-,nd tech- nical factors and long- tcrritl benefits and cos t:s , in addition to short- term benefits and costs and to consider alternatives to proposed action affectii.g the environment. " (Public Resources _5- Code 21001 , emphasis supplied) . Since the Board' s Resolution and Plan are totally devoid of any consideration of the extraordinary large costs involved in implementing the- required action, the Board' s action is invalid in not complying with the relevant statutory requirements. The Board ' s Plan Sets Forth No Evidentiary Basis For the Specific Limits Set On Ocean Discharges The Board' s Resolution and Plan sets forth the quality require- ments for waste discharges to the ocean (Chapter IV, Quality Require- ment for haste Discharges , Effluent Quality Requirements, Tables A , B) . These include : Concentration not to be Unit of exceeded more than Measurement 50% of time 10/ of time Suspended Solids mg/ 50. 75 . Chromium mg/l 0 .005 0 .01 mg/1 0.001 0.002 In addition, the Board' s Resolution and Plan sets forth the quality requirement for wa s to ' discharges to the ocean of a number of other substances , including grease and oil , floating particulates , settleable solids, turbidity , and a number of minerals (arsenic , cadmium, copper , lead , nickel , silver , and zinc, etc . ) In no ins Lance is any evidence poi_n Led 'to which suppor is the Board ' s establishment of any of these individual specific limits , or quality requirements , for waste discharges to the ocean . In this regard, the Board' s finally promulgated specific limits bear no relation to the generally less stringent , and more realistic limits tentatively recommended by the Board on April 20, 1972 . Generally speaking , it is fundamental that an agency -6-- must make findings that are clear enough to inform the parties of the ba sis for _is deci sion, so the par ties can de ci de whe ther add i tional proceedings are warranted. The findings of fact must also be clear enough to enable a reviewing Court to determine if the law was corren tly applied . Savelli v . Board of Medical Examiner , 229 CA 2d 124, 134 (1964) Hansen v. Civil Service Board , 147 CA 2d 732 , 736 (1957), If the finds are :.unclear the appropriate procedure is for the agency of reconsider_ the case and clarify the basis for its holding. Fascination Inc. vs. Hoover , 39 C 2d 260 , 268 (1952) Temescal Water Co . vs . Department of Public Works, 44 C 2d 90 , 102 (1955) SIZIT-7.lRY AND CONCLUSION In summary , the (SanitaLion District) is mriously aggrieved by the failure of the Board to comply with the statutory basis for its action. First , the Board' s Resolution and accompanying Plan constitutes as "project" which requires the filing of a detailed environmental impact statement (puns-uant- to Public Resources Code Section 21100) ; Second , the Board' s Resolution and Plan sets, forth no discussion of the alternatives to the Board' s Plan , nor any evidentiary basis for the Board' s adoption of its Resolution or supporting Plan; Third , the Board' s Resolution and Plan sets forth no discussion of the cost of implementing the Resolution and Plan (as required under the California E nvir onmen to 1 Policy Act) ; and Fourth , the Board ' s Resolutic-n and Plan sets forth no evidentiary basis supporting the specific JA-mirs on ocean discharges (for chromium, mercury, suspended solids , etc . ) adopter; by the Board . The Board' s Resolution and Plan is a mere statement of the *"woe Board ' s conclusions, and the specific implerttenta tion of those -7- conclusions (1) without any reference to any e V idence before the Board supporting its conclusions, or (2) without any discussion of the Board ' s reasoning leading to its conclusions. Without such evidentiary support the Board' s Resolution and Plan cannot be sus- tained. Accordingly, the Board must rescind the present Resolution and Plan and hold such hearings, and take such evidence as may be necessary to support whatever modified Resolution and Plan which the circimstances warrant. Before doing so, the Board must issue a detailed environmental impact statement, consider the alternatives before it, and provide a tested evidentiary ,basis supporting any findings which it may then make . Dated August 1972 Respectfully submitted , Xyz sj i ITP.TION DIST'ZICT (John W. Smith , manager) -B- F r w y • O .c.InQC�Pr C�liitt' Sat '--ay 13,i972� a Soy �3 1� IF F G C1,a I U it O S 3 n, A lawsuit has been filed in Federal rxc)aslve to TA*Times from a V01 Wr31_r district court hei~e ,;ccking an in- junctio against further property R1 VFPSIDE—Superior 725o. Further court acquisition for the $5Q milHon, 17- Court Judge Francis I stu- PMCI'eclinos are scheduled mile Century Frce,av until en- cIi}la 11?3 issued a re.tl4..in- for Friday. Y vircnlr,en":1 impact studies are r i n g order prohibiting made. further action in the 1:Lr}- -Plaintiffs in the action are the Sicrra Club, the NAACP, the En- P0�7ccl Silver Spur do,,-el- vironmental Defen:e Fund, the opulent in I'ahn Desert. Hawthcl'ne Freeway Fighters and Thirty-n i n e hundred persons living in the path of the members of the Concerncd propp ed freeway roue.,_% Citizens of Palm D?.=ert Tlie are I-epresented by attorneys Inc. hied suit colitendil Frederick, P. Sutherl:ji:d and Brent N. I'ku% forth of the Cc.:hi r for Law the cn1inty f ai l.;:d to make ,, in the Public lie .. Interest, r-lice Rosalyn an environnivntal i:lip%ict• Chap1ran o,"Western Cel:ter on Law study }`'tQ:'� :;:'Jtllf.l:'�", Col- and Poi'ert-, dition�:I v1so t��•rmit for tht� In their action Thur.day, at- �'li}-2CI7 lie\'L'1'!1)i)1Cnt. Thq tQrtl^VS c"+r{;li� t12.''t 11-iti)- Ztate I)U: P:'o�e(t 1,t 11::c(1 L':• S:l;c_ federal grovernmcnLs c_:lplied with Spur calli fnv: laws rec;uiring enviro!.liicntal im- constructi-:i of `',716 unit.;• act�•rlcl<es on the l�.,,led freewa p• y: :•• y. to be b:ti'.t over a 10-ycr,r The fcc.eral gorcrlir:icrit,they say, Period. '' must comply with the study It l o'611 i lncrea:e Palle D?scrt's Pap;llation i;;; reglirc,n�•rit under t':e National_ :nviroran::ntal Pelicy Act. The state government must comply , ith the study under the State Environmert4al Quality Act, LOS ANGELES TIh-'S March 6, 1972 r - ,T More s-tiers go to Mam:;ioflli I.alce than In iiy YOLI11ger sa;;s I!:e l,,l\r i; clear that the county �oihPr ski resort hi the nation—,and Suir.mer vi;,iors, lllltst.p1'Cp3:e�.n i'-121)ifCt St:lt('I1:Cilt }.lE'fOi'U �.'ilntlll;; ollttiu:I�I.1Cr thcin three to one. Yet 11Ii1)1at1r.^(1 ahermit. Thet;i':ci draftedbyDcl,. 11tt�•• Gen. gro%vtll and Pell-Ir.+�Il construc-flon are playing hn- \'oc\vit}1 the area. cholas C. Yost extensively hi.0 t11(- Ie isl�til:e ,1'71,JIilSt, tYlilt l:ac}: raUnrl, .ltf_�'. Gen. I;I:C'Ile J. intent expressed iil Loth fecieral and, state environ- Younger has illtorvenrd in vvh'A he terJilS "tile nler)titl 1iI'o.::(:ti(;Ii 1e isliltioll. mnst iniporlani cn\'ironnlenirll l;l\rsllit p(;1(ii►)g in 1W110 CoullV�' ('001Xn(IS t11i,t. SL,Ch SIPtelllonts California toddy." The 0111ii'ol-111:1 S1J11re ii~ Court 1'f l�il)'ved Only \;'i:C)1 t Minty i'Self 1a act.11,llly Cfl- Ilas grantorl him 11C`rmis-zion to fil; a brief ill `Uh- (,,l;;t'(I lIl I)1'Oj:.'('t. C01113t1'l1(1i0ll. port of I'rIcilds Oi who are`llin-to >401) 'J'111t' \\'011}fI 1',^;111 the rlttlil'nC")' �('ili'.l'%Il 111%lJli- ;0ono County from -ranting, a. conditional u�.c ' t„irls' that it ! uinicip'-',I polver con-'Irlw;inrr 1111t for a Ill,-ijCi' devellop:font until the c(Unty h.5 Z t11R111 lic'1\;lilt C)!�l=i%ltlt](il cfi:c:t fill - hiCj131'ea Iltl E'I;\iI'O:lI;lCtit�11 13n1),iCt st;llc'n1C',li' '111ent\\'01141 11.1:•C ;(I('01111)1\-1\'11,h the 1a\\'hLd,tii;lf it In contenfion is a propo;,-,1 to pal. up C`von- -in(I a poivate connp:oj huili a p1mit with identi(-A i!r- eig!lt-stork hl!iirlin O31 it \\wind The OF 1,11C!MV "W0111d u(: \\7ir1-2 fin(} alrloA on-2 mile "}'lle res!t11, �.cvord- tiu'scc? 1) ,,il iniorprct;itlon v iiic•h PN('}U(ic,S r-nvcrn- 11,_ t0 S01?;C properly 0\\'1 n 1'�, \1"o?il« I).. .. C1:!:llse i :('t:i'lt F'C)'Ilii'. •_i.- of 11'I\'i1lC .`l„nifl('c•Jlll'• . 1y':111. on,.")3'o:lmeIlt." `,1G3;o �,r,'iil( l:'!;: only ilnfl }...(;; '�n ,}ir, 11' i1 1•'1',`,lh'1 '1.:) •°ice?;'I' :tJ ('(, �' lief �li(1;,I111 �:ilt;fill 1 1);l O1 ii3r' •ill ll'i1C�' ^�:.?� .!• 1 strict. P, r t(J 1,1CC7i J:'� i�' . . T1iiI,0it1 =1: �, ('!t�' ill r'+!'�:... 3C? 110 \\'n!I! 1 1?• tO s,... _ (lc:;tl't c'Si• .1 r'� Il1O li:at ill';ni.l Illll TT101'e lt'C'%11 C'OJtil'o1S 11:1\'C '_'::'I1 (lil- l.')?: i11'C''s 2iI'; t% `ii the t1Q)i' IC► E'31- P ,Pod by develoil`-1•s. \'iralll::entali�' '.::I 1::ftil (1t'vckl}! :lent clsc\\he;C. �t>.C�:�..�•�lLk ��.� L"��C�i�li�� �w11•��'�Q�'1.'Cf�v� ��i�LiSl�,i���b j) '` ��•i•t;.�: w ppa�yy,.++ ��������� f� � �" ^•� r� _ Apj).•oximatelti- eighteen ,llollths aho the I,eGisl<•lttlre California Cities, and Attorney. passed <•lrld (,o\•crnor T:ca��:ul sinned the I�;I1viI•ailmellta] Yount;-er. Some of file stl•onne11e�,11 Cellcral Eveli'e J. Quality Act of 1.0,0, dc!clarillf; it state po]icy drat ,jong Youn",' f, �t c .tcctions carne from term protection of file (ilvirorliYle,lt shrill !�(, file fuic1:11�r Uer,`\�•110 s<,icl that the proposed guidelilles en):is- I, ctl}aced the act Its it was passed by t}le Legislature. Jlt criter•ioli in I)ul)liC decisions,,, and i•ecluirin� th:1t every a leil�,rf}l, pefit?OIl 1'ourl^'er char,.. 1 ,+ , y proposed new public: works I)1•ojeet include a report Illisstated the intent of the law and tlun the nui(lelines describin the potential ii111rtct of the project on the the scope of the rec air dill, iesti'ictcd slate's environment. `Phis act, the product of a special the defillitiorl of a "project" for \vI 1 eln('lits for ill,p act statements, Asseinbl, c0inr11ittce on en\ironill('ntal lct;isllttion, a as men( must be prepai cd, and the application'• 1!c}i rill i)llpaci �t:tte- c)oscl�-rrlocicled after the Nationrll I:n\•ironiuent:tl ; _ <(j ,.l:c.tiio.l of (hr' �lct itti- Act passed },, (;onnl•ess ill 1969. at'' 1 to "on�;oir-!?-- project,. "Tile Levis}:(tare's state(] pur- poses in eiiatct;n<, the ]:I1\iT•ollmer,�<,, ►u:tiit, A(�t Alf:hou�h the slate 1a�\ hats keen in eflcct for more Young <<are f a! ," tllrtn r; •ear, the exact Inaill)er in which it will be car- The A i. btlli)l(]stthe�c il\�ironiment<iircl �;euel•otls ogles . . . rie(l out lemaill tlilsettecl. '1'lle .let: rc'cluiic's st:(te ril)(1 ern me]Ital deeisiOil making." into .111 phases of bov- local ao'encies to prepare sonle form of clivil•ollin(.1)t;tl impact statelnelit for ever, project funded by Ui• • through the `f:. , . Clul)'s Cbjectic►ns to befo'-e tilE1 ]11:11' Yeeeive appropria- The Sierra Club -mil;irly charged tions or gr:llJs for such pr(jects. Last s!)rinir the Secre_ , �,cd that the interi;a tarp- for P.c's oilsces, i-u1'nl:ill ' guidelines c�!e se!ioa ?\• inZ'(lk! ti:tte". In file clul,'s � L. l,i\'c l nu,l c. Jr., 1S�liCC1 a view, they-fail to carry out "the t�l anise of file ::t•, SCl Of j)1'Gp(►Sed ��Ilid,el,Iles for the preparation and eval- because tl.e d0 i1Gt m,_j_c ell\•il'Or1111CIi 1 untron of the sl-'Ite onvir'01111leni"I impact Statements, ail illte .rag part of decision-??- t 11 C'C):No". 10,he tnri. thcac t;uic](�lilles \"ere ilnnlc'(Ii:tiel, attacked fi coin ensure that file pu!)lic is acicc11a .:il:i„ \o;•clu tile; several quarters On the '"I•otirld th::t tie, fall far short state action. lllsteacl. fife, eTlldoit>c,'`c!I an•./`�cl<;lirior,io Of the intent of the ,l,�i(► ]e,;islatic►n. '1'I►c uideline \elopinent", rather f11:1n protection of t11eC, \•' Tc1 'ct- -were approved by file l.csouicc:s A� c , c 1 iia.lm „ , only oil ail intcl. basis and Livermore `ll"M,1y, but and they "deny the publie'an}' meailin;;ful opj)Ortuni,�- nrecd that to assist.Stale m-e his strtfl and the U?ice of 1'l,;)lnirl�r ' „(ncies 111 pl'UteCtln�rand enhancinn c�;ir and Research \rollld state en\•ironmerit." Conduct two public }1C'a]'1i1^ti in .11111', review \•:1•liteil statements and Comments from ill',crc'stcd orgalliza- Tllc Sierra Clu}) and the Attorlle, General lx,t}t tions, and thell prepare a lllucl, illor( detailed iltl(1 rise- aI'lled that the 19 0 stattite expresses a lc•,isluti\e in- tions,set cif-Ilideline>for pt11)licaiioll early i1] 1J",2, tent that. all state ren ilaton- n ellcie:; \rllicil conce111 themselves with the actions of indi\'idm-ds, corpor::- Irtterh inte-il), s tions, ,Ind public agencies must (10 `(, with proper con- sideration for prevo.-l)tincr r, e11\'ll'U11211_tlt:ll (1::!)l:tt e, :111C1 statenlent: is to report. the "si,t.nitic'mW collsecluellces that, this extends to permits and l ecr:('s issiled to pri- which a proposed protect nlay havo for the total erIVi- vane individwils and corporations, 'well a I, r•onmelrt, list file adverse ellvil•onment:ll efi'eets whit•}, as-to pu]).:e Nvorks projects. "file atithor: of the �uid(dinez. as \v(,H cannot be avoided, propose measures to minimize the its file consultant to the Assembly cc,,nlr.it, which project's impact, stls;;cst alicrnati\'cti that nlinht have drafted the statute, }l::\•e contended, 110, ever, that fife fewer adverse con~•'t1t1(nCCS, rule? inchicl(. commel,ls oh- Le,rislatilre dicl not intend tll:lt impact sialemellt:, twined froill otter• public a,r(,�nc•ies which have ail ill tcr_ should be required for activities other than "g esL in the matter. The Statements ar,; sllbillitted to the mental projects". �o\'ci I1- State C)car•inf;hOuse in the Utlice of 111tel-govei•nm:l►tal ]1Jaila�;ernent, \Cliicll ill turn sends Copies t0,; , . , Lea�ue's Position 1 • 11 slit(( <►.ul 'I'h(' Leas;ue of California] Cities criticired the rig)_ local ;tt;cncic \Cit}1 :ln intc!cst 0r cxl,ci tisc ill the rn:1t- ter for their comments. if these ot1w)';t„ericies disn,;i•ee Bence of public llcarinn� Or] 1111paC'trcc- With the ageiley v.•}11(•h initiated the! )'('l►O1't, tl(` j�e_ Ulllll)('ildfCl tll:it lOC':11 :I,Y('liC1eS be I`:�'n t11 '. '•'�i'i\„i<r •'• Sources A„encl' 1S to act as ":t f�c'<•11 poillt. fill' clarilln:- of llolclinr; public 11e:W1111;S OI] impact Stati•lllvii'L3 1!'tC)• l]on Of the. connictim' r 1'('\':,?1t ln,; state :,rd re,'lrmal it;;�;Ic�' lC!I1)I;;t ntr. In CU lltTl(•l.tS. `S Anio ng till --.p_ who i•:llsed IITl111Cdi< add it,U,l, the Leag-we ask-l-A for •!►�•• ii , � Ile 01J ( ' ! ( Iltll:i'.1t O1 ,;;r V 1 C't1O11 it, (lie a(1VIs(!."V ('01111l:itti:t. to]lltel']Ill �;Uide,lnes wen. the .sicrra (;fill) League 1'epl'(';i'lit ll!(' )litC!'e:t5 O1 IuC:t1 fife Lc<1„uc of ;,ovenl►.nnt it] \�c�rki,l,; \t•iih the ,,L:te t0 cn- PAGE a_o ---,,1AN unRY 1 072 �z i9vcj -- z L AuvnNvr VIN110jilvo '1Joro.u[ lLlau_t pill: .Iddliti .till::,\ 1: jo (1011•)[l.ljtiUO:) lijl,l\ p1:aqv j�)1 '.")vo"t 11:(l.t!101' INLI.I0f1Iv.) of -.[Ojaq '?.l:•)It1.�'11:1:: j.)L'(Illtl ficjllJUtil0,1f.1([J t(.1: 0.11hl :OI `.c.).lo Dill) Ig -o.l�i of j:I!.11:t1) O;il lodulo.) of 1!11, )111 ,jo ja.)rgo aILI. (:V�u:lpul:ll pill: J ul"'Od jo 1 of D111 pp): ll,;m\ `I)alll(I0(1 O1 '.ij11110J Oaji:11 111:�; Ill 1J1.(j: 1(I ,IJ1L'\\ .ljtltl0�) a1)1.�1sI:OJ J-.-j ud noS 1T '.I;;II(i)u1:t1 I)l.'I: J:;I:j;SOd JOAOJ I(Li\3.1\ `jIWCU D111 ;Stl!L' 1: ill 'l)lill,,{ 0SUJIJ(1 (':lU.)[tIUO.(I.\l['•{ J[(j :1(1 pli-as 110.\ SI) If-w, a('r -[( :(,urmo atioS .itivd XIjl:tl:1u j1pu'lio.1(I 1pis I: III poillor ;Ic[11 11:1t1Jllit(o,((.\LI�I 1511iL1 juatl[Slnf) np.IO .md :uuIlptlia{ pill: aj.),t:1sOC[ ti Ii:,lallJ�� `JtLtOjjli J111 `jl(j( ,I:)(Illl.)J)(1 aj1;1 [i( -.1AL'1 �[ SI;(([ 11Ji J �1)�, 'of-[ :SI jSOJ -)If I, 'S(L'llp(.\lpu( pill; �.ti[ ai(j jU SIIntSf.ln.1(l 0111 D.),IOpI.I Oj llollaL' •)I JS.Itj Sq a-ml).uld .11)j )IgUIIL'.\1: Oau stmaluo i)aloa(3 S)! Ujlt1 JYMOILia I)1:(( 01VIS Dill 11:1I1 ()J.)Ltl'.outll: .E0.1.tlljok ::) Dill j0 S31((0J (l:[1Ut.jlppv (L',(Ji(JO .i3u,iUj1V 's;)ul,J1)!nu jUJIIIJjI:jS 1Jt:(I(UI .1\JU atlj .121s0' O soldo t;Uol I onssi o litlf.(L'LIJ.1d SI,'M .1J1WI ' SJJ,It10sJ' Jl J tl d} I 1 ppd l F .I ij -- - - - uo!Iot! !t'S)l � 31r1S}sr' i -juooJod £•L sLIM s0111s litu .101 OscaJoul a6eJa,\z' •luaLLl--)jVjS a ll '0L-61,)1-)L JoAo ss@l JO IUDO.Iad xis Alu0 ,4c1 paSt;aJo IJL'd it[l Ifal'J Q(IIj, 0ddtIS S21.111)U[U Dill j0 UO[11:L11(U1:Xa -ul Sanu.�naJ L1O!y„\ Joj SalelS ua,\a;a }O aUo SUM Ssol i{."�tU),Iot{1 t; ,loj .�j!11c11:(11;J ,I1t:1S imp (IolJ.wp of po.cl:dJ.ul -aLijJot.OU `SUOil7.3110o XL'l le101 UI pUUOJS p3)jUC'1 yOlyn\ S3011111--,10tlCIUM S.tosati.) .1.1a.\ L' tit Sluo 011:11(Y-.13 'r:UJOj!le;) 'SJXL;I awooui aluJodjoo LUOJj U0111!C1 V-C£ pue AlILn1:a1: UU-3 1! II)!(I.\\ Sjt[JIIISsoSSU IJ1:([1.11[ OLI[.\o.t(Idu •saxel 10111 JOIOLU wo.11 Uo111! j g'gS `sOXI;I OLLIOOLII it:UOs ; JO LI0!j!SOci 'lltt)!Ii!() Dill u! Jlasj! I)Itlj SULLI `130rv,td U ,IOJ . -JOCj LL10J} IUJJJ3d 03 JO `1101111C1 L'015 `S3XLI Sc)IBS lUOJj S{)(Illj �)ji;jS SJjL'L1(I0,1(I(IL' Il I[J11.\1 (tOtSIJJp .1;L' (iL' a.U.t2o `lucJJJJCI OC Jo 'L10111!Ci �'�LS Inogd 'Osno:.l 6uueol� j sa.\o,(cI(It 1)a{j.? u! 11)!LI.\\ `J.tnjl:(:;1.�D ( Jilt `suadLll::( still aO.OUJwoO Acl pal!duloo elep of 6u!pJ000e 'uo!II!q S'L5$ j t(ali:\\:s)!)tlou I1:Jol pul,a1[:ls .i(! pJ)npo.icl .k,Ilca(I S.I. -cm DI 0 .1 l L'llb D( O sr asil,1 D.[1., SUU[.satlb sntomas c, pOlunoule LL-OL6L Joj suo!jO011oO xLI alLls lelol � ;)III .! l.i (1 j �' - I .l-'• , 11.-OLGL ul onu3noLj alelS jo S031I)OS IUCIPui,ld O.toJDcl ,:uo( Jcl of .�(a'(!(ut1 s! j! Jul `.\\l:1 Jtll jo •t31131 Dill t11[.0 DJul:ilcltuva J.\DIl1)L' oI luoluoa.11."Adu u011'u1st allj pill' J.II1jL' rj JIi1 j(tasa.vl jar •Sjuaul)j1:1S ' ,,..wu.e•oud t Dsollj j0 S-1111:i11)Dill oI SI: 11Ul1SDIII) )til sl(n:uEm alat(y ---�. .., �'ss �_` '�> r �%��/ 'v:►,-C.!fj( piilu1putij .IOj pJSOdO.id S I IjJ[I(_1\ -- ;::' uL.w I)ul: utaj[ .it:11[l0 (t:}tcILJ .loci sjI ,oz0.I13lS OJ.\IDJ.),( SU1.1 11,.1(l:L[V J1Ij .11:D.i s-It[,7. 11foulaIvIs 1aarm')hl tiv Z111:( ... -.... _:. �'• . . . .R._ } � d :itn: .[oj ,ti(tO[Illx aja(Dp o>t �';:•::�:•:•::;:•:_::•: •:• a.ate.':'•'•.'{:•:�:•::�;�:�:•:-._ ,z.` '-':�f' •cc:�.'::':';': ::::::: SSDLi�((if(1.\\ till I)Jj1,.IISItOt(IJ) t )tlr.1\ `JJ (LULIIO.) DJt(la[ ... .t:;'.:;:•::-:• •,... .. ., . i (• . 1 1. _ a.,.,.is .,•:-+zc: .+:c':: •I ! --- ....•': .�r. :•'.._':: ...::-%:. ! -(. alL'[iD5 )Ill IU0.Ij I[tJL(Ll�):,ti1OJ(IJ JL(10S i(}t.\\ '.(�).\a v ...... 'p;)ja,).UOJ TIOOS tit' 111;>Is.(J.\0 SII[.[, 'S1CIZ-),Jt��S .:••.••:•;.::; � :'... :_' ;:.:•�c.:a.:. Y:; :_ 1a1;(,utl 1i:juJulllo.lr.\uJ .irj pD!nl:�lut�JJJI: a.[,)a\ 1o;pt?q �;� •:��`: : •�• •? It u( )o)it )ul s )arO.1d .il: llo t: Id1,J .\\atl all) jo .\\aj +:: . it [ 1. i:l �J:�pll'{ - tJ .'•� j t.:�._,_ ,:c::'I 1 {i , .) �.� IV I )t{j 3n slsSI III. "I( m -r:; ,t► ;...;t.:..'�::.: : :.: palou 1SOCI U1:(d ' 1S.�(I:u\;- a.\!II'ls (>�'L .Il,a.i V •:,.j ,� ,:� .•.•........ � �-::�-.-:. paaln�)a�{s;iwwa}..lS S}s111' RULIOJI.\IIa l()I(I.\\ .tDls[�J.I (['.(J1).j ait3 I i alig llantii `p0. rda.ld D(l Ol S[ 11(0Lt(DIrls pi.dull (tv l I 110j slaDro.ld jo.mjS12;m n ,jo 1101iupla.11a pill. 1lo1jV.n!d3.Id .(oj I(t:J Su0!1L'111:040.1 011cjs 0111 11_:t(j `.(:).\;).\\0[{ `p•)1,(oda+[ 'DIISS[ Dill j0 ul.11,31I n A u(puad iolmo 1,Inoa S[ I( 's1CIJLU311:jS 1JI:((U[I j0 UOIjI:.II:(l-).((I Dill II_I ([()Ij .10(.I3d[?S .1(l :�IIII'..IO(IU_!aj pD111:t1 tlaad SL11 1oD10.(CI Dill, -:II:CI 01 1liJLCIU,[D.10. So DpISll10 Sl[U(}r.%[Ul::c�.t0 pitL S(i?I1 • •i 3.11: sa�It:-I t{1�)u[ult:1` D1(1 ul s.Utt!plfnrl .f.to}S-l1liltu O«\1 -pf.\Ipu! ,toj Sjlu[lj.l�)(l(lo ju1,)I�1t1,31s .iulc .[a_[10 (jt.\\ .loll} O tI0(1)11,IjSUO) jo (I;,\O,I(I(It: ,1;unoa )pol(1 of 11JOLULUI:It .IJ,i1'-N(.\\ S( JUD1J j0U SI }t:L{\\ 'SIto11L'ItliJ.t LL[L(.11[t( aL11 tI[ ,0 5gmDmj pJIfI.J (1n0,1u 1: :l(j .�JUIIOD OLIOI` tt[ jil,3noaq papi;mid 3tulln0 I1m1IpJa0.td JldullS Dl{j pLIOSO(I 1(7.l\ 0.3 IIaaq SL'II )aI, OLGI 0111 Liodn poSuq 1Ins .tat{loth 'Im.'s S( 11 'SJU[(OpI11-V AQ11 all j, 'SJl11IJ[)[II LU[.131(li Di(I j0 '„dvD1 Soill a,lopq_,pol„salt soilp;) 0111 JO ',jMUUlap .IDI{j0 aLll .')11f1001.1( p.It:.\\o} -L:?4L'I1;lUatull.umoc`311:LIj 3,lilsul 01 'Sp000.1d tiolptL11SU0a .i1101 L' Ou 1(rA\ l(3111M Sll[)LI1311:}S .IJL'C[Lt[I jo uo[jt;.(1,(j, I?J=O(Dad t([O.[j uuTjII1s3.( salkLutp Sjt(IN1b 11;j(IDLLIUO.1 Dill of SJppIA'J DmSt1Dl(3.IdUIOa 1)1,11: pJip y)p Dpi.\U.Id Op -(.\U3 .iJplsuoa o} sla\a[ lip 11. SJ1au0-I, 11:juauilt.ID.\o� n�)iI1 IMil 1t1C[ 'po'!a!jl•[J 3.\l:tl saotljo ptlu .(a"ililU,,t; (c.Ia .m t)a.t Oj pv SI!J1:110 11:jtumiluo.Imua O (j( Dill.2111louua -1I09 .i01I.1011v 113I11.11 „ .-Wo.Id„ ULIJj Dt11 j0 t[O1j1UUap II( a.11111>(S[ua'I Jill j0 IIOIj[1Jjlll D[II 5I:.1\ I[ I)[I:S,T0'Uno�T, pJ-jlliI[( DLUVS Ot(j (111:jJ•( .lallj jL'lil .11:5 sat[I(JI)C[12 :13tI -UOTj)L' a11113 )111 'JUIX11101ELIL' Ill '133r0.Id Dill j0 1111Sa.1 DSJLij j0 UOIS,IJ;\Ijuap v IIJas 3.\la( O1j:.\ atolls, '[I)dLlti.10 t: St: L'J.Ii: 331\,133 Dill U[ aSil pInq tit Slaaya Irflualod :1.[?:il.[C{a�I Lit 311(Iild DpL'Ll[ 0(1 of pallipJllJS aav `s.)I3 1ilti `Stt.l3;ll:(( a ji;llll'•Ip pJlla.(D1L'.1\ II1 Sa`'uurila `slmuzuq -UD-" 31ujS pDI)DjjI: Dill pill: IaU1(I1:) 9 D[I1 ,iq It'J[I4,)IOJQ 11:1111olod of I1o1j1:.L3ptsll0)311'.11I)ap" tI3,\lu.[Oil AWL\3.1 1?UiOZ.(Dptlli .\\oI[ J,IL' L(Jlt(.\\ Sa11113pf11 .tla,-j %[(l.(i1S .(plum at{1 01111 110ISII.11111 .(all"m 1111'S j0 .13211l:p 'SjiWLIIII.IJ:\U%; 1L''�l J`[1 30 1UJjaa Dl1j patilLt[,(a1D1) 1a.1 10ti St:[I 1t jut11 puj "Utlr.\Io.w1 sapid-st :1Ut: ((I (MOijl:(3'( 1I:j[[3U[1[.ID.\O Dill �)jl(ISJ1) 1aar0.tlt JLIj 1111.11 SI pI.ijslp Dill t(U I!JI111oD at(1 puL' so-milo-sa'I jo .1.11:I3.(JaS Dill tioamlaq ;uI(I S-011":t(3 IWO1130 Sawoliv Dill.\q palU ja(.i(1 oily UU[11:j(l1SIt0a Sil((I 'L'[,ia1(.IJ asU pI11;1 pL[t: It:IIIaUIU0.1l1A - dJrectors and administra- Cssh Flow Problem ' ' Water Mending �' ° Von," Fred Harper. cner- "Now it ap cars we wM Water 1 ;t Treaug,"nein _"� Lv6 - P P� T t prnlucet , each -cr of the dis-� have to go hac,. and ,evise plant will he h!rrr?e:l and a +- trictc, sr,id T'r,ursday. our cr•tire 11rojert," Har- ; injcctCd i11t to . unrl,c. 1 ,-1 P• r ql- n 1 per s::!d. "We will have a ground hn,!n to (halt sc.a. Yi� P e +' Lo " + con ova: zp- n 1 water Intrusion nd to ex- d C=� n n 1 cat h f? w problem anti it n, a t pointed \Vcdncsday n:6-ht loot„ lilac the Nvnrk will panel and t:,pgrade t1lc ' With to work n'ith I,os Ange;f:s ha to !)e 1 )ne by .Jan- ire:nwatrr '1)'lip ply, Cor:ipiiwtzce tiditl� Stricter State Regulations Could Hike � � r t r I . Cnunty Sanitation D i s- uary of 1!}77. '1'rcatcd scar::fie water l Outlay for Upgrading Districts' SySteni to 95 Million o t "I)1'>i`a::: th,lt the dis- IN-ill i)(• I)iivil to the• rerl::- trictc to seek a rchcarin„ before the Water 1'�2- tries u•?I? i:ave to go into matron I)!ant from tl:�• =a- hin!n,:cal serrnrdary troat- nit;iry di.a;';cts' fcri?i;�•, i 13Y JACK BMTT\BP� sources Cnt1U'nl F3oard. 1 men;, and p , .c e more ynri the :: lt�' r:a;rr rl -:- Tar- S:af: Writer Named to the CnnlmlLt.cC m� + ,1 stria. n,, controls n, in- cha:;r front ail.' (v'Lcr fat FOUNTAI\ Y.M.1,1-'Y—The coat nt!lo-lon.; outfal?, trtlnl:s and Sub- ' n•ere P!aeentia Council- dustt;es lrhn are discharg- tnrr ;rill he piped ilitn t::e of c'nr ,lyin' \:•ill_ ^(:',� sulte Linl era;;e of r i ' into h s 1;:::—(::�ch... :1 r 1 n_ t c yle.m." Sanitatio,t i)i�iri('ts' ): r nlal: of:r:'L f'inllei., I'(1:, ( -•t- t:ons On t1•�•::1C'(l . :A':1�C (1is(11:1t';; cI 1:1ti i111}llUll ;:d?(1:1a (!::y rif LrC;1tCd ). 11,,rprr sa,d it is ton (fir- fa!I nrar the !1:0Y:th of t`1e inv) ti:4 occaa will be lilt:•�})' thrCe \ti":.c.CC Nvate: into the ocean, ta:n \,211r)' C011nril^.1in a (3 ' ly )•ei to ricer;ninr_ what San;: :1;., }tl(•r:•. lliO:e thaIl `IitlClp,^.tCl1 ill Or- It is avainst this discharge that tilC ,JL;1., :(nta Atla �laynr l o- of{cart the dizchar�^,e policy Watet' :1:; ('Data)'• tough State re:;u!atio:'s N ill be n� :, ren Griset. J?uena Park wi!1 h:;re nn industry, Ha Ila-1 cxpc(•1ec! thh tig!lt a ))..it, I)y the seven Cot:nty Sani- plied.Arion;;tile restrictior.:>;)te the , Coun:ilman Jc;,e Davis p!ans to invite industrial conirols aril s,cy that they Cation District., to upgrade tircat- rclnoval of.111 slwl.t'e. a sharp r('(luc= and Norman Culver, a (di- representat.ive; a- ' Or. will he aisle ;n imil;e ad- al::n; :acilit:cs hore `Intl in 111"Itu1g- tlOn ill the;uriounl.of [loath.; inatter ange County ('h(' of ju;tmcnts to meet t'r7e)n, ten 1;(rn(h woul(I have cost ljetwcen rind the prohil)ition of hi;h !cvel .ra- rcctnv for t h e G a r d e n Cnrnmdree mernhc to a !'hey ad^lit, lint;'arer, r.:i!:iu ,;ntl : 8 million. 6-c"Ictivu wa.z tc .rat`r ll. Grove C:;:111 I'V D?ct.rict• tnrmm S: h in his office. ,July 'that the: inl)uL Of e•opp• r ]'CStr!eiinl7a n'I:C controls l'C :iII::Cii Chiefly at A •nwmhCr of the Blo.ird .16 ,.o evaluate the hm;ta- t ^ I « ) ti•+� t hr (• :/n- re '. .t t e of Sups rvisors also will he tinn?. frtn t.'... (II ( Ili(:'tie {. .. Unl:'.1 l:.tit iC,'('.{ by t t:a , � p �1'Ci:t?r�, C.U:, 1nt1C(, GCC':111 Cl to?- -from Rrir1';n:'al Ind tU})r•; il•. .t��.",:?'_. Con:. -1 t;C::l'•l "voill(I orat:Da :IL`(1 laid:n,� tll(, 1)t.;1C11Cg of ' nanwrl to the committee. It is also Car) early. Har- in the dc..:l!ting I;.;r.t tivill ,l 1 , c ;,r 7cr whn paid the ,. }act::ucil ; .•i rr.. - b;:ct(:r!a 7(. 're:sc. l s e an attar- L } per . id, to i71an ;have to ar '.,airs r••: iun :I:... 5::;; n:•il nl (}i;:ric,\di 1 , distrie, \�'a; re )rc,cnted at i I :'cc- The ti;:iti;:it)i)1r L at , ,�'c(. (lip:cl7a:';.;c po. •( J e prediction on hove ,�•. t(::'i „'CS'C t(i!(i �� '(!l:C ,i:,'. ri'"' C• iCy 1Ci1' .:U 1) 1 fr, n t all ..1:''P . ;;to };(Visit heat.-' much mnre :n taXeS 1r111 ) t '1 ^ l, ' t cco:1 e e :..Cti o until I t 7l•:,. nC �) 'n_ 1;a, nbout S:}',' of tho li' '17Cr lti Sa17C ?r it 1) !, ' �, it:�; on ,1::('11A1'rc 1'C'C1t:IrC^ ral'C t0 bQ �tal(1 111 Orange .I - i t )r.0 •y t})c eaorat En )• c � dist. ct t' pay ' -} - c; p:'ob.l v ;(oalii he covered by ?ro:urenull I'ratection:1 crc t . 'i C y f h :•' t :Il(1 cGltp ":"ants. QS'::1: tC CU;11'1l' ( 1 p ions. nr the Jn;tal!a' ditional Cnjt+ in • "The ')nlicv !•: a (•Dm ]cte sanitation. chi s t. ns. 'state discharge' stanl`a*"!-;'t Th;;. means thus usthimLed aniount k,Ie;v t;,,Ilter lial"Is were co171in reverscil of the way t}lat He said ncc an di::charges at the Water A'actory. to ilc r:ti=c'.1 {Into coctnty ptopurty and wcrc plc'p^`inn to meet t}lctr thins have been moving. from Water I'ar.tory 31 true, in t}1 di>trir.ts would climb 'i hey hart pocc ccic`ci, they sai(1, on It ir; far mo,'e r,l;i(? than' may al>o exrivd allmvalde from $7 nii1'i,v, 'o between $17 mil- the basis of te;titonne presente(1 C.t that 'proposed by the }units hoeause of cnpper in Ii n: and $11) :nil??na• tl2rce 1\'atcr Itesotu'res Control board'.; men st. ff." the, hrinr. :1ho;a 1.:1 ntili;on perso:ls live in 130a1-cI hearill"', the last on Yarch.l, 1!ari)rr said the. district'4 The S22 million project ' sca'vr(i by the Sanitation of this year. Karl hoped to have a ttr(..t- is under construrtinn at D?stricts, Geller:ally, the service re- llo(vcvcr, the extent andseverity Ment program in opota- Irdlis Ave. and Ward St.,. ?,: houndcrl by the Irvine, ltanvh of ;ht: rc,-itlal.iuns "wore•unexpected tinn by 1')76; that would near the sewage treatment . .I t}lu J,(..; .',n;;< lr.; ('>lult} lint. an(l frankly c2111c .s a shocklto the fulfill :gate rc(Il,ir.mcnts. plant. y 'iThv s(�v:;"'O.Ii:,:idlin:� sy-,col—in- I. r.nt. 'fl7e factory will ler he .)..�n, �r:iS to inst;)I1 Lure ,ri.jaex. waste water Clu(lill two trc'aulwilt I)lants, a five- s o p i:ist.?cato,l ireainirnt ; rec:amation and seawater facilities at. 111,nt No. 1 in ; desalting plants, Fountain \'itlley and some 72n@1C8 '�'�i'$ � new trcalIne�t equipment LOS A , .• . �, , July 14, 1972 t Plant No. 2 in Hunting- tan Beach. a llLIO Uri rIrl iI"r F—Wed.,Feb. 10, 1472- __.. . . Leggislation Pen(l. ty -"They- r:ialit to be is d. F e d e r a l 1 e _i:,l.,t irnt diete I '1'l.e least thc�v : /�' •..�� FI r4,e:�t ,n� p.i v.,hicit ,.could rectuire tl,e could sat• i= 'You're P�• h° �l- "1 f- fi r r; ;, s „-� lutin�• illi harFtrn•;lnd here city to .top d.:chG.,,e in o '= V. = �•` �' .� 'mot: `'t�J� I� tt the ocean rp;arclle s of is the eti ir;ence:" grant con ideratio.is has 11'ilkin--on dcmandcd to a passed the Senate ;+nd is kno:\• 'why the state ;und f e t. �A ! �` „ }.• N Y2 rio\i•p"i:di2l�in Tile 1 ,UDC'. C:e d 1 O��iC.11S C? .'t. s .� 3 .• ► t ' Y. 1 :t r=`- •%•� , ! r come h•.-inl-e :t?,legislative A similar proposa is mi- , it > � ;` '� i .c ti ; , ,�� ; '� `� t-, s�r• der co nsicieration by ille i�aly of th.- third lal Je�t- -y •-' 7 lrl e� .,.� R Via::�t;� wCT3_�� stafe U:;at d. ,. In z=pp•:alin;; fer the ci-t�?-in.tre -Lnitcd State.. • :�1�nual c;)er;ttit►?co is of tl-�e se�\�_ `" r�. �. ,r • 1 t' moratorium, the Coin-1 it I hev 1 e not that ;si1�)s are s;;;,t,ni �cl:o \rclilld he in-creased p 1•` noted tliat a "con- he prote:;tc.ci. by $7 million it said. re o � nci, • sideralile 1);o��j•" of 1:llc�_:l- Bureau `Sanitatio:l Di- rt n / ,1 Yhot;l ille state and fo1or<il govorn• e a 1 O; ��'•�.,��ui•tug�i� �'`� Q�s, cc,Ral).z iecl:r�ician.. an:.l mentq have en c led z;rohr.-tmz pro- � _,� t rector T.eh rt D. I3ar: :: 1 C �{, (�� t 7 s,,► n 1, ci to scienti:,_:, h._iie\•e tl:;t he a • �14 oal $1, 00 11"1illioj� \_Cltil�, t.it2ti:il r�I'� iS-lt �i ban on slU;l`C is not ne..cCs- ShcCl he C1id not :le" .e l9c•al go:'er,l,i jcni� ,or the con:-iruct r- ', ,• that the �1--sent. iC" nary in tl dee) o►sc.:,.e j ,;c -•_ Lion of nrn\• c►: improved se,rage \rater._'° C' tl.et5_ :tl� n di n. I system has an BY r1111VI. BAKER treatment facilities. �` �'`f Times Cisy 6ure.v Chief Lnit('I' C':<i�t'71�' 1)rc)�r.1m.,,, `1tC California coastal area. "a4VVr; i nlpact:� on tj't �, r, ,- , Cu:n'�liarc:e thi�i'r-WT .1 I. YZen a d �.cler�ll t1rn.rr;:mellt 1�.ili ;i- 1 • ent'irornlct)t. .�. :�llgele c-,iincil•, ,►, a' d `' i • , t C' tf fill to J'v irf tile_ Cost-011 Eli !i- t\OLI.CI 1'.Cj li.0 a .i•.l i i1- i:nC1Cr'it; ' COtlr:_ll r�C:i(1 to state and fc(a^r�; a''rencics '1'iics- howeye'• 1.� lcintc, a:.lti );le ;�r�ltec't:---c;llliEi•� to cit.`� Corr:- i , ., , n i C c d its Cal i.al investincl.t �. 1 , d;c� to grant, a moratorium of "1t'G l,lipnc- u-itl: esti.�llisilect eo'idkiol.= stttc3i�s ,c!2.c1 l.ic l?ei'.t, i- city• t:,aL co 1lc. m G \';i t h r.;� dcrlonstr bh- mi)lion \\'Ol'tll (?f 1'cCiUi2'Ctt1e11tS ,+(- I�tit' the ' • t ! r�:,l ;,t' �` -� led t0 ]?:i.cf-'2C1, �,ild 1! i:1C fectirt� city di:Fo ;it of sludge 1 milr for tale increased c�;)itnl e;'iflc n;< thGt �uc11 ii:\•e sludgy e 1�'n i� e.e:ltt:<ll bse-wage t C C" i n Y -% t 1 '^•rl;ic;:l•1 1 l '1(�a+� "1', 11 have. ' e into t Co ,s—��:iih cit}- rxI)ct;dittll of me,.t :,, t:r< <.b . �- n a� (: e the.0 Lean. 1'}1 li�iili0:l--tll� 7 C'I)nTi ]h11:.;eC1 out, affuCt oC:ea:l \':4,cr C:i�lity be't p)—zi:hle plan to rro The requircinc-nts :,re aime(l at cess t1.e .. uciQ.,e." out iIcautioned, ar thnt alterr:. ��::. :.f • , i + ph=l :119 o le disc:.:a_f;e currently It hcir.•e\-ever, _te m _hills n�. :..erp..:'.• throat h the H�C F."inil pl lrt in I'l;l a that. "filere are no def..ite disposal \could .ct 1)e the cot'11!it ;e:,�ac- to : .-t : ♦ 1. t , • • a_surLnces •than the at. , more detrimental to t,le "Let's I at tale .acts del Itcy, t:•ithin 13 months as an an- ;-. fun ti olltitien nle�ic,tre, \rctlld be mach a',ailal)le• environme nt," the rC:I ort fo:e cc �tni tirr stir, hlE' t0 :ttt' l.e. 11I?%i..0 i;a C`llicf Dep. ('i;_• Eii irce:• 1?on<r'.(t Of the alrc_�a(.-] atlthor- said, c o m ill i t n1 e.n t s \vhlc h, C. Tillman, caie? thy city iTlt<-,t he jZed 'GG Iililli-,n 1)1101' n.1., Both t}:� state and fed- ,• , r - might L., unnecessary, ffica,., >>;\; a_,tici- oral zg^,zc'i s .vcre re- ready 1, ready by nlici_,<.=;3 to i:rlj,l^nl^nt the ` " , 1 .,_ �' ]lnte(l il:at C: IlliiliUrl quoStec'l in the council ac- p=1�...co�It Ol "prove that, it i t;n- , �- lion. to l,_oiue technical nececs dry." Would Ise finai,ced h}' state 'I'hc council_ a kc d the :tale 11'.iler and M."eral L;:ant:. a::.istaI.cc in evahlating Ile:olirces Cn..tcol Board and the T1-- r;`=i,nee \',ould be re,-tilts cif the Coastal Wa- Federal E► virrxnenta.l Protection proyirl-cl by t:he S60 mil- ter PtL %.,%-. llgenrsr to Cuspct :i the rc,ulilti•nns ;ion r':enrer bond is;.ue au- E\•�l:trticl) :"ysl:fd pendin, completion of tile Snutil thoriz 1 cd -,y voter: .crn at the They ':o ;~•ere asked to nil F;, D71.election. ;'^� '1)e t passi- Cklifoertli:t Coa?tal 1V� iirx Pe varch P ueternihne t1 Project rend other st!;die-, on the of- Suoseq:ten+ to the pas- ble alternate means" of feet of waste =.:a;:,r fri tale or "1 ' `a`e of t.J Ilond i=,ue. , sludge di:ra_al •ircludinY The$1.1 Illilli�,i1 rPsc.uc)7 I)ro ect i; 11^''``r'r• ih`' s�=to Water g in its third and `it1_Ll year. �e=^arse•; Control Board asses.rent of the en•,•iron- It and called' C111'I•ent. are ilOt:ilc cl the Cite th-t in or- mental ]illpa,,t of the \•a- der to ;;,.ratify frir f rant expected to yield significant :zcienti- ftln::l it-r:.u=V ,l � rious ail=t;.atI-e . fie data ;lffcctin:; t.:e csf;tllli. l.mc:it I la_e out Prior to adopting tugs re. of "rational" waste \\•atf'r disposal the of ;e;t age requirctnent . sludge ii:tt) the �cea 1, p o r t, Coi,t.cil Pre;ident The coi.mcil, by a vote of 1.4 to Rebut S. Ticirii, chief of Pro Teri Billy G. _'Mills and 0, Adopted a Pub!;,- Worl:s Commit- the city- en�ireel•'s s,lrar Council:rl n Robert 'M tee relmrt which c:2:i�iz rIi.._ic.n, :.zici 3l?f?; l''i :o'1 C'e'-ottnCe3 the concern over the "si tnifit'ant•' fin?a- 'i r' , ,`, 3 are state and tc delal acren'•ies vial hurden r:Iii(•h it. Saici c;tfo, enit 1 c cl.il into a u e nlei t. a� l ,` ;Ce- d"rs=•'• rany(,n tl.r,,,;_'1i1. ,l, for failin:� t) send rer.re- 1 of the reJa �?:itin5 �\'Ot:lfl place i-ride long' �O-Ii:Ct2`H�4.'1}- sentativei, to the sczs—;;n. I)- oil the cit . erion outfail. +. ''It'; a shame, crime tienver Pro-rant Requirement dig;rice ilia.t the hc'or!e An Clpital hivest111eilt respon=ii)le icy_ tellin.; t:; of .7ht�1'd\iTT1�tr.'l `.IG� Inlillf,tl Overhow to 1'i;il tl1c Cit Oil ' ilim\'e th. cii.'� current �1C state ar6i fc6oral scan- �,l;,in main:• e:�: •1• crnl=trirctic:na Cis . ] vo',i-am %%ill 1,� rr i,�lir(�ci to with. the J'eCtu:1'Ctt i'ntS, It warned. 110t l'nin,l?� ?C�'�:.5`'•�C1' our (l�:l t.'Y:•," .•l l:lcl clarcd. _ jo aaqutnu v osplaxa 01 PIN 1 'R'41 OP 01 m',.01 Ott pulput: Isodri PLO., N 10S L"'-q JO! U S'-:QItf PUL, I"Irlcr N%ou 'A'J�111'1 ...,(I T -S �;i� lkpnj it�; oqj III p I i14-)Jj 'P:l .spa-'-pur's ;)IT1 sic -)u(L,s q I laalu of 1ue;d mjn:)1,.zud still uTO,'j 01 p,-�I.,I I -c,,-,rl oq) S(( .10,q 31lq p'z1.-'Tjqr.d sparravis salvjs Z)L[l UO P:)sUq .Ioj 2-u-M zur D.IA A) , L -0.1c'z ou .0 'V Flo 111c., . p AL"I s! pzitisim5ml SRO a113UX 01 tiollrA,)Tlqo Stu ;UOSAU'd JVUOIS -sajoad 'u s-,: put., 'lUT,'ljO(,'Ulf S!;)A SWA -IMS11V otil Itl2noqj I 'Il)msu"' Oq1 -UP 01.11 pau.113a[ 111jull Dllqrt(l 0111 01 U01jum -1011.1" q,.Ijsrap.j jo uojjj..lt;-, ou prq I jpqj U;)w 3',0 tjo,S 01 ss, anjor- -L v-C ano ;0 al-'O lu *(.uOg ..nu III p, yZ ZLJj JO O"dLUI JUJUWU 'o-) .10f)"Ut ,10.11AUD T zi{lcd *finp 01's-em P!103—st jutI.T, *ofpnjs �IATJ[Si)d -e 11 11ra I 'ui illd a.'A 'Ettil sluul -ol sividdo Epj} uo'-ppolp by p) suol 00g,19 aonpo.:dpjro.'A Z)Il 'all-qAj1.jL'ajAj oluv�' at.11 ;o 1!10 ij!lRj Ima q . antt-o'Ou "' Oc '113141 Op 01 -I-.)U(Iulr jrluauluo.lp"I.) '111-Old �-1141 PDAOLU U0 A plr.O.',� 31.1 PU13 'Sj�u;) '�J`�T',Jjjlod jo ijrq[(, -"l DAI 14 O'N" UIOL11 110'1111(od aaouf jol -C pal-C .01aL1J JO s',Ir)l C01 b t;'Ml a;)'-,pc-d ol �;)'Lmnos oil ,).jjqmwS[j io jaoq si luaus -2.;3 aA%, 11,;4't plij j 11`10.1% Mjl� PUV a Z)f t 'li -,-i -ciny�u jo suol ()GO'gj Pjr.OA-, )If atil OJUT U011111710-1 Wd a%\ JI 9-41 Ill NCO[ 01 .131.12fq -uof,4'en3lto '_ut Ind Tl!.,Ol urql juaut -C dZI 0.1), nox jr-.-,, '1-1-*.�)117113 JUD13 -e 1Z)2 iq 0-��r' t I I Y" ub SJaA'U aq, 7o ,no ilojiniTod ;).TOUl O-jT';j S110.1 lu�)n[lp O"ut P;�?� I aj.,-c 11noq jl 01 -,7ulpjujzlu ;0 -11p., ol o, l-."jua-'-Uuolj'-j2J J:.'jt-xTau v amp wi -o3n (q '�tt .10.1 Slu.) d al2jnw,-ii'd a0l t.:j pul, -o.rd -rLwno,-,t uon-pa;Ddo _Iqj uo posucl 'LuaL,3 34) s, ;).)npO.Td C'I UIT14 JO; 'UOU '!(), --f3 .1 OX-37 at!" 1-�tjj ST I1OISlnj'-)uo3 A- 1 01 IU-IOJ C11.11 tU('Jj oqj ;a.,. So.'IF;aO 101,11IT"a a"A Sl;j-115 OJL-;s pur, Ul 1,ijj Ill 0��JUO'. U10.1; Skim tmj pLn., Tpluo'4-ul a ;Q si-Tol C.C.01c ��qj Inocl-e a"ll .10LITI-latu st 11luid I-lawlcall XxtPp -Cdu1r',3 1,r- Inoq-e ;I siq,L "ql ulf-M, JO 'aO -11 x'of-i -Su 01 JeTlalu'ut pue S2.1auo 30 •'mo.-s pal:,3z)-os mo wo.ij -,u,�wl • 'uc"Imlvc�d ;o su-1.1"41 Ill opr,:o a-c-'21101141.1 c), u 'oluifm 1af 3.14 a=n-c;)acj @Ill 11.104 -ja • '&:11 jV"Lj1 St futqj jU"3.!.ZGdu1T I cs 0 UA JO c-1101 LUGLUGP11,33 '-Upj.',:OTP anud1m; :o zuol of.- va -zt"'Jawo'; O.'101U.3.1 01 -"u"qjau-'c" S.*t:!CJP PI'U alA -V All 10 UVT 1110'4r,...)j:cq citil 1;:oil 'Ir duit j1Vj'.laU.UWjAII,) Zj S71',d Ir.-wcop U0111-ml gz�" j-eqi 01 uc-mppl' III "--twaacl lot11 . . .+. pI-L u z)'Opnjz3 ;o suol 0001t; z.jnpo.id -uvld ano uioij pa,%ouzaz 3M sc TY311LIA ;,lord i r.qno,,.% 'uq,#Plad-) siqj cp o-1 lopao III :.43110ut Sal-UTI .111.0j !3-t 113IT -lie .10 Fa;s exi -Ull s PIMS I Pupal Xul 01 mic.) I-eqj f"Imll Islij OT11 0 C-- 1-)�' ut tcpal-e-ul Olsem jo suol ".Ott f Ul(),Ij S"UI3111110cl jo scrol OC-31t ootipoad pmo.Nx 9,.k� z,1,.I;3qjstp waz Inoq-t-, I p!n--):,k Srcl-capad Offi, Pa.1;O-TT OAJ '11011 *F:11 1,10-9.1 ivi111vu 10-411ol c'-.010T. -rlado aol tive.-ji:z zjIll a3lipold :fiuola -I.fow as-1 of p?r.oN,, am iu-ejd rr;qno!l.x Ud • s%jj tuoij s,u-e-oT7o-d1 L jo stiol Orjcjl� Spi-e-ali.xoad of -o.) jo �-;uoj OC..0-61 asn ol. ;m-3-q am, osiv O-m ).1.9H Li L t - ') fiq • ;o 'sli-em fipw& 0; )t z.-1Ow-aj o' Ja-uo U'[ wup I r 'f . t -OH-1 l-j),),r) fillpow, o; ma?jrptwo-t T asai'll, io as-ri ;)ql lsr,.f IUO.Tj yy, plim. Ue t. - --olullsa) ISI-extuap pa Ftl,;" -SOL11 q 1:011-pp-P, Lif -dla-'r jo OS110'rt 5q) Opym:,,jod podj.-iq A7, '-Ou P!p 1 IT"luix,Isuoll 'Jia PT.)C ',)TJLILld spm lvr;zta)od --caado '4u?ul'j-) aqj puv 13als .' a 'Ins --opnjoui smtj, -u jz) nu uoijedo ��tqj D)ILLu 1))O!J 10 'ZUT Ili) a of :�j;:Dlulaq.-) w mZU')l (,co'6 O'."cYpInd 01 )A'Ct{ .,T30 I-oo 2 aLil PtIL' .-JUTl atil IOJ r1l plInq o", ;o vopqjod pio) 6111.ml' 01 tlop-�'Pv III WAInoq a.w jL-ql Alddns laals, Pqj qrioq-c mofj 'Tn;'!-. Pu-" '-,uatudinb-) r,.Iv:,3az?au Siva -ii7vi plualw/cmm'a av! jo *q?!d UO L)'IIOJI 01 aA1:Ij OM SAZOLU 'Ou. ;1 1 0 1, atli 31 jo it? �?qj 01 jaql1a 'N'014autog 10 pa�'O'j I -,�M -IU )A% LTPi' ?Jdx�op*JC[ &-.i.to' .1).dalcam, Rpoo -sup aq oi 1'?ail jtaS .tad uoilliul Si juiod ;qj, --,u:od �jq; JOU ST I"M-11 1'.1fl z"11 ZmoJoq fi.(O?u?jpGq Ift In ..L'Uas Jz1d 11011 0111 01 .9no /O .1006 COT srlTd '@pj%O 111-720al1t-I -40 S1101 09 All .-)(70 PLI-C ic tit -zcj In Uoill ' :j.�j "0 0111 pavollva.n") S-Vil ift1s),pla yj:7L:,;-,09 apjNom aniqd1w;jo lad suol()qlc,* U.7 . !EU t C-E-' puL' luam-sa�1Ul "Uj!d-e3 jol UOIJITUI qzt -S;-jj 10 *Sfi')uL1'3;7)A &'110IJOU 3q; OlIff jplla 01 Z.113q rllnov� aq lquolviL'Od aul fip.11im-) op)-upulp C.'3r!'I a--7�)tjj a3p.po.1d ol ILoD jo suol ()rjolg asn PUJdS 01 aAC-q PlrlU-�%ZMA 'STM OP 01 JDPIO III . I . - ').92 *.)Iz) lluaullra.11 a-21)'ITS P")j--"Tj 01 aq pliwat U, PaMY'10111en el ;a,,,r-Lj p[no.v, ;)'.4 qilvapj z)t,qnl -s*fl 7 - L 't:OjIUSUaPLI03 12'aiddialt; 'uorjuz fiq 31pp JV1 ED `-CE61 'T 'U"-P :49* 17)"; 11000 aqj �q pjITsqqnd rqvp aril 01 --TulpjO3aV L.�jl -0-C Aj-eptjo�).JS . . *%. I z 'MI, U 'U0111, 11,.ja(lo 11un -&i6il pmwmd aawl R.v:)-102,oj 11)V; -Pt 100a -3(ljjaja ;o oce"T alit irloq'; mOH -Tilt 1;l1au -a guns 'suo. 00j V IAI%A OT11 11 @9 l 0 �sOO T-PTH OL11 ZL61 'I* im'dhV 1A,2psa11.L cwNunor jL,:i3.,.djs TIVAk 'J- HJ ;,-Iom I! Lp,LN� pop" ()I 0.)Ud, 10 -,'Ur UNIt,'JOA; 01-11 JOJ 7100Lf p) Sj(t-,jj ')!il Ojo r?,W)15 *1%111 Z' Iflocli. 111 I Np)k i jk L;j Si1'11 -IN -!`,01 1? UO vL DS:I I!'S j 1; OIT i rl()T, M Of CO I ptic Wul u o" W Pet( IN -rI.L SI111 ut -nilu 01 Zd Iiod� ,K)JOJU.) IM01 Umo-4u.v.0cl olp Jr. loldo') 'ut -tlaq ),Tccu:qD Xitu'l u-, woij , T .)(J(I, *Djotys LU01111C Okug .101sum 'x-JI(TO.-) - Si2:*%,. 3,J 1:`111 A p- 4'Es* 1,)U JrF xij jo p,L,,-jtl -Dill 'smeqsp-JnH Z T C.13 I'M �)ql 01 -"J'�u, P-?-T9PIsUO3 20u;p'Llu s3ticudpaq ItUal 2uul,. is[ -,-,.!du1np Uca.-)o *Uvs ol ino:. 0 J,-,'0 1.;,'P "0 -,vrtvz)-)q �iutdujnp (I U-ITNIH/A MES ol Spuzq U;)IjO LUI)'Nold IVIU3111 o"31:(I 0' 1p cmunTn 09T ol ;)I-11,)1j ur.-)Jc) Ino 4 'S- coz)j�jqj OF1 o4-u01uu3 -.)-.-fo jo 4')u-j-pUZq a-I'l -1:\rtr 1-CIS, . illod luilL 'OL,1j'l Ul A!I 1131,11 If UOTIM-ISUU) I- - , 1131"11011M. uo X�'Szar AlOkj JOILi'lo Put! I),v.I;j,)pujj �%C)tf Dilr.OD 14'.0tj S011,31put 110i"ZM1! 1 -,6* J .3 MU11 4 -jo pasod '1,tjjp,-V -,q-. I . -� -sip zidid otil o pulljnil 0111 od Ljoyl -sip '1 01 n'pI I s o2otu S I ,m LIj 01pu!,q 01 mc -C SGI1111 ox"ilbs j , ujrlq u SI uISmu. . 0 0UI ;))),n' ) v 1% Ipi palvultutlI - I DLI n U) j)rL1 u o: ljuloq TuoIj fu.1j umt poloadlita 11 .p 1 ) pillom p-u-,[Ipl:?, " i1')) '1 )I u ,1if flz r2% m oluti0111111(i 92upq Simldju io llA; li�zlp puv p 'PlIVS %IT� qnjj?, AV-11 SAYtOfj t1011 L[:,TIJM yo 11DI1tir 3JOLU111!Ak'ILLU"d JUXUI —I v III ou s,; qtlj-,�tmr olps I U.'O.IJ u,j (in j"Umin-ar-) io juz)urop ,,I wjLz,.% am1p -Xaunurf ut 11:ipw jjt,,oz)1 ST XU 'Old 1-UL1,1 111Ci1 -0 01 :(u- -S000, If," q1 'uf S w 0-i d IlUI)oo aul I't o'-,pill jr-lopaj 7"X(I f; I 117 T.1A uoju !Imllodwlaur 1i;i11 ajopq ijourl oqi ol 0�01:),U,).,1ni10d 1w, C11 P;)L1,4;rs3p jo 3111 III wolo'.01a p-)f-o(JL--1P sem '�j�llls �Llj;.SpIc"YL o"Opil-3 0 U* vm"),3 U!I ,%0qs 01 nTICT Up2." ''() 0111 G Sun� 1q'oJ" ao."t I -x"', ;Dul u( 211d 0;)O,l pl;tf J?.'qj!uV-) ;M34M, F Po --U -0.v"I"(I JO •1-,Il0r1 CI ST-A% 1�)Ilj aSp su.1A 11 i) III Plus .13-1�;Utj1 -J;-T I -d I ol --mussodLUI 141 w v in q C n.,ju 1 2upp jo violio jq1f)pq v, p'cnbsoA - - S11rL!SjZ-j)T1H -1;-, PULl Olf �i-ur ' ); r fTkl �OA PpL1 Smnilia;IV ) u I & ru LI ",%ous I? q2nom-,1. # .101 1 ,1 14*u73 prop, volu W41 -:);Ilp nuo� m � oua'I" o um p -o )op-);,Id It] A x L -q �rwlou jjo )!U ) OLt atil 1`ur-!u J uLij 1;Zs eoFX . t11 r iq pi,pp, -SLU::00.ld jU1II-3LUUO.Tj1L:10(, jtf) (I 0jDqj i)J!j ZOUUMU SISeifou.) t I*SI-rlaISIX SlrI3TJj) Ilf-opad tio. Simsuoultuoa A'Al"Um"11p) polli.1 Q-"'4 Oli Isul p-)j0.\j- (will (I I J�v cu Su T C4 T y'I T T T its- o kA d 1111,11 Cf (I .0. -1T1;,1111.v No 51 `II Ht"I'cIVITY AV(1Zr11JYS err an�rtc��fttir� -Fri.,lulls 7,i 972 'rhr, nc%v rules rerlu:re renitn•al of all sludge from Water hoard menlhers' �'o date; 11-i:Vp };yell passed the new red*ula- for meeting tile_ Ile%' tin; sett at.e. tions on a -1-1 vote. The A drastic reduction N,Jill its. The dates vt ill ,,e s �.� � -��, ^ ]one di ;;erter ti�•as Vice , sy e <- TP. also b•- required hired for float- , establ►.,hc:d nn a case 1, ' _� q I, �, t i K 1 Chairman E. F. Dibble. case I,a;i; t.`z,ou hot:t the. t.a.� il,,, particulate a matter, He said the limits are so grease and oil, s!i.,zpended state, solids and settleable sol- stringent that to of}t in - t.hom will cost "seweral 1 ids. 'l'11c turbidity of F"Iw-, h!lndred: of millions of ��•,e trill he far I11n1'e c:ti•c- fully rcgu►at^d as 1:•ould dollars" mere than the Water Board Regulations its acidity. � board esiim=stet � Dibble c.2ici the require- Most Stringent in Na-tion There will le al;-lev lrilifle rnents for }teary metals -� p!•nhihitirnl of high-level level , in se��arye are tougher rarlioilct.i%re waste, radio . than thoic; for drinkinc, BY 3011IN' DREY US5 logical, chemical or biolo7- - n water. Times aatf �lrilcr ical warfare. agent-, lln' Regulations, described as the na- tre�ited N%,aste and cli;.- ITrr Lenient` tion's most rc- trictive limits for sew- charge of any tort into He 11,c c,=ed more le- aae djschail I�,d ill':U t'be ocean lz:ere llarca,,� of special biologgical n1Ent z•i:-qtltrerilents, but appro�-ed 'Clillr::d: 1)�'the state��'a- significance." Those area;; u-as the only board nlcm- ter Resources Colitrol T-kiard. will he cic::i,:;natccl by the bet• to ,-nte for them. "It's a very tn!inll polio," said bill board, D u r i n t h e next, 9 . E. Dendr, tl;e l,oc.d'�. e�ec:lti;e offi- All fpcilitie• required to .-ears, according to watel• ter. 'It's iruch trnl�ller than rn�- Ilicet,the stringent nex:' re- board staff calculatinils, it tllinn that': bce,l done hefnre for t11e qulrr inellts, can he operat- will cos t, S t�.I million ; In „ ing b.; 1977, Dcn iy said, nually to poly-off construc- c+ce"Ill. The regul.ltion� require a,lprov�tl llowever, John lark- boil costs of fa.cilitie built from the 'federal L''Ili irnlllnei;tat llurst, hear] (if the Los ill- to meet.thc�new rules, and Protection a-cncy before 1)econlinh geles County Sanitation another a l-l.-t raillion a effective. Districts e:t.illlate,I ID,,} as year to Kee� tl o:e facili- the eal-Jest, ioz:ihic date ties rule;inn. The total Facilities nettled to meet the ne;v 1 standards gill cost t�vo of eve"N' for rneetin; tale new re- cost; during t.1 e next. AS0 three Californians itlio,e Gc,r,-ed by .?I•icI.ir,ns. ;Fears will be about 1;2.9 sewage districts cikcll.x-ing to.the :� tttic;-}?rnn�ed attack is billirni. rl ll neces ary to achim-e the Cities vnd C o u 1-1t 1 e s Ocean) aho!It. ann!la.,y -Y-31- the nlniley ''the ocean ill de- limits. 1r,du,;ry will11Ive •,-here the facilities are 1�-};r cical�cr." :r:;d Fr^d McLa- to e':ilair�+te nl>>cll of its hLllit. .Ill !roar t.hc full cost ten, as,:ist�tnt chi^_f of the .water pnilutirl.l -- Particula ly of their r.l-)e rati( hoard's di�i=ioll of �catcr ctva}it�, heavy metals such a mer- llo�;cvcr, ;�.i?� of the He said wJnlmiilr wifll no curt'—before it, lit is into roilstructinn casts will he longer at t i 111 c s he infczted ��•i?h se �crs, and �atlitation dig- l),�ic1 }.y federal grant:, Potentiallyc?' c-1•-� : t �ritll al�oi'.,al. ?5 tattling 1:=Ca=e } ,,;c1ii1;, fecal � iricts lll!ISt cic��•e.o:� far ''- •,_ear from lllr►t•tl s rmlli;t 1i':it�'�l r- -Pge fro-M tll� Fia:�. Only 20 t') bacteria, re:,s,_ Till ul>al p Oran.ge Co-t-lnt�• beachez, :Intl there tI'c,!t211ent prnc.rc�, ; than will h? paid by local : Will be no more slicks o-:cr the Los are currently u:.ed. goverl:r►iel�ts. .Angeles city and county- sewer out- year of Fre-;taraticin 'I'll(: ratio inay' falls. ''It nlay rec llirt: shuti!ng since a kill I islrl the f(?c;- Dendy said h„ expects off certain in-}as, era] share to i.��� h=�i c_ �rial di.s: grassed hotli h.ous es of Con- the I.-,Aw rules "will save charges comp 1 e t e 1 y'," 4Y1'E'S5 1:nCl !s now In confer- Californian.; from Marino Parkhurst <<xicl, ence. The water board has State officials said thffir ,erlously polluted offshore' }keen pia-ink the neu- rt�;t.e,tirnatc:; are a}rolut� waters in the future." re lllationa for a vear, and nl;3XlMlll11A, alld are ba r,_l Ile said }liolocn is have has hold three pvl)lic licar- on fintlr�_ rc;�ivecl frost] lzegull to find that «•ante ills where ci,tics--both , az ,. polluters ands c r. d i;r n irn:�mon- `'' di,:chal•gcs may he killing 1•, 1-1 o w�r...e'er, Parkhltr.=t, tali fs—char: I t. z ,tun- who rux: t'alifornia'- Miry. microscopic 01'0�1111;z1ns in dards 1:-ere •r:o: i.azpo,,_ 011 g e s t Fai,itation faciliry, the occans. Death of such scientific siil es. called st�cte e-tinlates "far orgabisil's deprives- fish of After th fi,�1 t-A-o f>ublir, too lo-v." food, and t'lere.fore lov;er� hearin:z, the l:n:,ri's haft lie sairi tll^v a's'P based the fish population, advocatcd rcia•.inc- its pro- on. Dendy al co noted that pc� cr.l }inlitz;. R11t the re-u- di�claar� r before the 2n fill► steer sewer o!ltca.t l; Thl?Is- nouns l_:lzt. of the I1PN'7 tend to il,il•e much lliyiler dz\- N':ere e'.elt stiffer than and fa nlnl.0 ;;:lingelit re- concentra?inn:; of heavy the. e propo•rd al. the fir.zt Strictic,;.�.. Metals ini' r 11'Ili.::IE'.;th n r'_lt1?1C llc':II"11'r. To enforce its new r�, `.o do Cf i h in C,•�:,.1 (.:t':,l �1�- 1"he i-(-tric'i\-e liniii: 1 .� t..l rl. • iflt ton Z, t�,l• �,•?t{.•� ].,]till were set .after• con,ilt a- can 41 i- th;- fate' iitto,I,(%i "Our n�'\- It Sul lion:," tion of testin.onv at a1.1 , " ;11 prck-E'nit tllrre ilcarin •:, D e n ci v wen_I..+ to file snit or )t^.lrlt a conLinii;,tinn of dotcrinr- snit?. fine., n, t, t�> ti:;'COW a' dly- nI' it C.il 1,,"ta eonnei;ti'1-.�5 atinll of the 4zt;:le'S pCCatl GI Ile;V,r".Ct;I'SyS:.CIs1S. waters." ' Los Ac-d s Fereld•Fzawb r, P-tersd3y, July 6, 1972 `�` �c.1� _ :!^h ; f '�•"..f'e•'...,C'=:., r '�'}�.-r C'±!',rtn+..'�,.-ta+�a+�•. .� y,_S'i� :` :S �x,;-. � f / � �'•'t `� _"'l �c"rT` .�:t f;� /""A ty' rid $ [4w SACI'%AMrE\'110 (U P I)---A;metals, Pesticides and ofherichiper of the DiVisiort of 11'ater far-reaching plan to cie:,n Up llaz::rdouc su,>st:�tices. In et' "t,!Quality, said citrr'crtiy there are ocean waters along poliev wo-uId force gross effects row" from the 1,100-mile coastline by striedly ary trellt:nE nt of rill sc.wagc uis- ,(Imost. 1.1 bilhon gallons of controlling w a s t e into the ocean. sc!v;at;e flint is ca_ll­pod into the has born disclosed by tic St,'k!i cost of the cleanup Pro-;eco-mi each day off California's 1Vater Itesollrees Co.Itrol L'cdard.� would he �,Nout '$l billion;coat.The bvrd %:as expected to,l)°.t.°,ecn now and 13 t} for n:u-I But there have bvm stronn APF''o,c the clan as o:,ic►a ;lc n:_l se,.v,go sstems aT,di in,d;c.,tions, 1;e s 11. that tie state policy todav in Los Allge-!nlo.-e t4an -inotlmr $l(:5 :nillioll ;;ksfes were c;l.t_;;lg-the disap. les. for private industry. (pearance. of ke,p 'LxAr s, malfor- BI1I ll. Delldy, executive off, Under spo.cial grants, howev- m:,tir►n of fish fins zind untold cer.el, tl:e board, dcscr,b d t`lr� ,., �,,.,, ,iC . ice, il:c•. state ^nc: fed-r,�l gove.!.- ci...,,..;c; to nl.cro::rol.,, o.d�►tl- prof►os:,t nl,:n as "a- very tou:,h; ,m:�nts :void:: pl fx 80 her certl isms 1;OliCy tou''t'er tll an Z ttywherl'` ►'` ; r i �I., O r f a :,• n t county, .11 ;:r€�� me:,t p.o-, I� �lre cliscLarros are not ct;r- cl in the nation." lti'llen the;{.,l;;ls. Indus,r;es ,would have to;tr.Ped,_ he said, the tove Nvastes plan is frilly ini,iiemi-tt,ed, l�rn'3-�,;.t�; their o:;�n ;a;.. !could have "very drastic conse- ably in 1977, he said the OeNt ti` DL,lndv estitll<liA that the cap-1c ucnce " in future nenel•ations would "lie less toxic titan drink-iit:l, cost for neti'r treatment fa-:of aquatic life and man. inf; �•ater•" in Los .sItnlc's R lollcl 'I'ite of o losa] c?' _ for region- esThe poliev, which ht!s been in �y.c,,ll; run ahoilt !160 F1111 on.;al water quality bo eels to (le- the \works for months, tij,ouid;�j l;c'r Counties hit h trci by tile; Credit', a maximum proteutlon;,, SI�Il OCeaTI pl'd�iCC,'en Plans hj .l-anup campah,n Nvould be Ur-;the end of th,s �-e,,:. The state zone ex,endino at lcdt 1!100 fe:tia►1?c, San Francisco and Sari r� .; offshot•a to safenitard swine-i .,1_.. ;-ll rc�iea th.. plans an. nlcrs. ° Di n. set up all enforcdrd.ent Plan. It also would ottilati�,. the For the average citizen it If a polluter slid rot follow th�� dumphig of slud4C into the Nvould mean all increase in tax-Iregional plan, file comity or ill- Man and impose stringenCes by as much as $9.40 a year. Idustry could Le filled up to standards on discharr es of toxiel Fre-A R. llcLaren, assist antii;:,0,000 a day. THE OIL AND GAS JOURNAL-JULY 24, 1972 ir n a Cell,u, L h Z;U �S C qr With pattern Set in Marsh new restrictions oil industries and Cities, ti.. producers and refiners face big cash outlay to clean tip brine and. plant waste discharged into ocean. Limits on metals are tougliest. HoWARU M. WILSON West Coast Editor California's tough new effluent restrictions THE STATE of California is imposing Concentration not to Lc Producing survey new water-effluent regulations which Unit r-exceeded more than-, Number of l;umbzr will force coastal producers and re- of 50%of 10�o of operations exceedin; liners to spend gretrt sums of money Substance h,leas. time time reporting unlit to stay in business. Physical characteristics The regulations affecting producers Grease and oil will not take effect until well into (hexane extractables) ........ mg/1 10.0 15.0 11 5 Floating particulates 1973. Those for refiners are yet to be (dry weight) .............. mgll 1.0 2.0 drafted, but they will be at least as Suspended solids ............. mgll' 50.0 75.0 10 8 stringent as those for producers. Settleable scGds ::::::::::::.. mill 0.1 0.2 Turbidity .. JTU* 50.0 75.0 6 1 Regulations which have been re- pN; ........................ units 6.0 to 9.0 at leased so far apply to water dis- v _ all times charged into the ocean by industries Conservative substances (metals) and municipalities. Thus, they also Arsenic ..................... mg/1 0.01 0.02 6 2 will apply to oil-well production along Cadmium ................. mgll 0.02 0.03 9 0 the coast or offshore. Total chromium .............. mgll 0.005 0.01 17 15 Copper ....... mg/1 0.20 0.30 11 1 Later, similar-but probably more Lead ....................... 111911 0.10 0.20 15 7 rigid-regulations will be imposed for Mercury .................... mgll 0.001 0.002 8 1 effluent into bays and estuaries. These Sily el ...................... mg/1 .10 0. 14 7 - Silver .............. 0....... mg/ 0.02 O.04 Q4 7 6 v;ill *apply to most Cali`ortlia refiners Zinc .................... ingll 0.30 0.50 14 in the San Francisco and Los Angeles t{onconservraive substances (chemical characteristics) areas. Cyanide ..................... mgll 0.1 0.2 All hit. Preliminary surveys con- phenolic compounds .......... m911 0.5 1.0 6 4 • ducted by the industry indicate the To,ai chimine residual ....... mg/I 1.0 2.0 enormous size of the problem faced Ammonia (expressed as nitrogen) mgll 40.0 60.0 6 2 by companies operatin;;near the coast. Others Producing companies which dis- Total identifiable charge Urine into the ocean have found chlorinated hydrocarbons . ... mgll 0.002 0.004 Toxicity concentration .......... tuT 1.5 2.0 2 2 in a survey that none of the 17 opera- Radio�.ctivity .................. Limits set by tions checked for concentration of state code _ pollutants could meet the required *Jarlaon turbidity units. fAcid or caustic. #Tonicity unit as measured by California standards in all categories. water Itesources Control Board. Some are deficient in several cate- gories. Fifteen of the 17 had discharges with excess amounts of chromium. Other metals causing problems in- parable federal restrictions have not establish a time schedule for conlpli- elude lead, nickel, and silver. Eight been issued. once by each company. The regional of 10 locations o which reports were The timetable. The California State boards must submit their reports to n made failed to meet the requirements Water Resources Control Board, which the state board by Apr. 15, 1973, and on suspended solids, while five of 11 established the now guidelines for the state board then will recommend locations reporting were over the limit ocean waters, has given companies back to the regiall�l boards any on grease and oil, and municipalities a dendline of Jan. chances it believes are needed. Refiners also reported that their 15, 1973, to subillit to regional boards Paul Bonderson, chief of the slate preliminary survey of 12 refineries programs showing 11OW they will treat board's i,ater-quality division, said shows chrollliulll will be the major such discharpe �vlliLh fails to meet the regional beards are e�:p�Ctcd to problem. Chromillill in the effluent of the regulations. be realistic in setting compliance time- all 12 exceedled the limit for ocean The programs must include a tinge tables, but companies must slnow the disposal. The regulations for bays and sch,edtrlc for construction of facilities, need for o pail h time. eshlaries may b; even stricter. tl:e capital cost, an} any request (with "If a company ha; to male a State officials and California oilmen supportimL, evidence) for less-restric- installation anal ,.ants 2 years to do it. say they 1:now of no regulations in the tive re luireallents. that would be out of line," Bon::,r on U.S. which arc nearly as strict as 'glee rt.giorial boaards then have au- said. `*Belt if it has to speil:l Z]o ::lil- those to be applied in California. Corn- thol-ity to revise the requirements and lion for a sophisticated syst.:in that wrould take 3 years to build and install, are looking at the possibility of treat- oceans of certain metals should not EAWy probably will. f,et the lime. There ing on the surface to see if we can be increased significantly. They sc•t is no firm schedule. The schedule will get sorne of the toxicity out—but not the limits in relation to what exis.s be reasonably in line: with the corn- the metals. There just hasn't been in the ocean ratifier than what would plexity and extensiveness of the proj- much research on treating produced be detrimental. Some are more re- ect-" water." strictive than what we have in drink- If a company is unable to comply Refineries. Refiners will have a ing water." �.r with a requirement without spending slightly longer breathing spell before As with the producers, the refiners mare money than it can economically they are T equired by the water board sin;le out chromium as the toughy,st afford, }londerson said the firm "will to obey effluent restrictions. of all. The restriction for "total have to call it to the board's atten- Bonderson said the board expects chromium" is .005 mg/l 50�0 of the tion and see what happens." to hold herrings within the next 3 time and .01 mg/1 11.1 of the time. . Fonderson conceded that the board, months on discharges into hays and Most refiners use chromate for co^I- in setting the rer ulations, did not fol- estuaries and issue regulations b,, the ing-water treatment, and tl.eir effluent lour recornmendations for less-rigid end of the year. A timetable similar therefore is well beyond the chromium restrictions recommended by the com- to that for the ocean water program limit. panies. will be issued at the same time. The survey of 12 refiners shop,;s no. "The principle followed by the board "These regulations probably will be only that all 12 exceed the chrom-m is one of trying to achieve or limit a little more restrictive because of restriction but that four have e::^es- the increase in background (current) the confined nature of the receiving live mercury in their effluent, three Ievels of materials in the ocean to waters," Bonderson said. "Certainly have too much zinc, t.,'o or three have 100;f, after a 100-to-I seawater dilu- they will be no less restrictive." too much lead, two have too inu:.h tion," Bonderson said. "Thus, if the A refiner in the San Francisco Bay cadmium, one has too much copper, present level of a substance is one- area said refiners in the state "will and one has too much nickel. hundredths parts per million, our limit have a great deal of difficulty in meet- Some of the problems can be han- would be two-hundredths with dilution ing these very low limits, even with died by source control by usm a of 100-10-1.." biological programs and waste control variety of chemicals for waterItreat- Production. :he industry has not plans." ment, but each refiner will have to calculated just how much coastal pro- "The limits on metals are the most assess his own problems and de,Rr- duction will be affected by new regula- restrictive," this refiner says. "My mine how to solve them. tions. own evaluation is that at least one is "There are a number of possibilities - Some produced grater is reinjected 100 times more restrictive than it —and all of there ure expensive,', .l;e for seennrlary recovery, but most is r.reds to be. The basic pren.ise seems San Francisco refiner said. "we're discharged directly into the ocean or, to be that the concentrations in the talking about big money." in some cases, into ba%ls and estuaries or into streams which flow into them. Operators of all such wells are now confronted with deciding «fiat ap- THE OIL AND GAS JOURNAL—DULY 24, 1972 proach they will take to meet the regulations. Because of the broad range of ma- terials covered, some companies fear there is no way they can treat the brine for all of them without spend- ing more money than the production is worth—or, indeed, whether it is physically possible to meet the stan- dards at any price. This may be par- ticularly true of metals. The limit on chromium,for example, was fixed at a level considerably lower than the board's earlier draft, and there is some question whether it could ever be met (see table). However, company sources say they are investigating several approaches to treating brine. But if treatment is not feasible, the only solution remain- ing is reinjection. This can be done ..� in some fields but not in others, and it may ;Wean searchlnc, for reinjection areas els-Mbere. "There is no easy way to extract the heavy metals," one company en;;i- neer Kays. "it is very expensive, ti%!e • O ; Pr'CpcS ea t 1�✓0.-°r P,�sou yes Congo/ :T- �►• , p, —• co 1 ,pjoG-r 6t 1, v. S cam-+— �7 y kn c� � s . 1 4 ti -1 i 1 •t 1 QR • I�v • � t.. f . 1 • � �\ 1 1 � 1 1 f Y CccuYin CY .05 Sea- Wa.&cr' Drink i n� UI a+e r S-t A-fi:�a.YyCs o(,t 15, 1971. r o 024. 2( 197OJ 200 v ADO FT ED' � 4 +fir. :Un (CGr?52Y1Y1�. 0C. .7 Q r ; -Eu.��11Y Occuriy�� �n Se^� Wa.6GY 200 0( . 15, )97/_ _ i00 Apr; I Epp 0 1�. .. . . . . ' • . . ,.. . . . a u A DO P7`cD� 3 1:2,00 -- `r r i n Seo. wo.!C r set /000 h • '�? Apr; 1 2°j 19:72- p no c L . F c� ro. pose ci « A Do PTED o 20c, c-r ,Res::,x.rCcg Con4rd IS per_ r d fro N � s t i N�.-�u.�A<lY pccu.r;nct � �03 . �n Sea Wa�.GY' 0 S'L`a-nab.c2arcL s Oct. 15) M1_ o - 2�. 26,197Z • Apri I loj 197E I ;20G 1i'2 c�t c..� l�i�;t�i r� ��„CG� _!__--�..._.._..�_:_....._..._......_:_._.:.._.' � • � � � ., _ -L J At LAr OL Sfan��.rd,s 197/_ J`✓o limit proposed ori. �, 1%�7Z boo 20 Cl-- 0 o . r . .. T- L '' c� D o P7cD _ s (Cons;-,terl.Yi Ive Occurin6r 3 Dr:), ink lluf4Y- 50 C1C� . 15) 11//_ l�o jir�Ll pro ffosec� ej Ij �'��1GJ✓'G. �l�. IUG i s ���,`��Y ,S��t ci e— t's._:.- i!� 1 JJ7� �GvJ?5lC.LGr'1rl �� y w � Zz� 1�k--- LI.r0.41Y CLC urrl i 10 Ln Sew Dri n` 1 Yt AecY -5�0 00 or,t. laj 19i/. moo n 2. 2�,1972 - v 6 0 c' • "d Apr; 120,19,72 ly7? 0 as Do t�7c0' pf t 1rA N COUNTY Ilk CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OFFICERS 401 BANK OF AMERICA TOWER.THE CITY•ONE CITY BLVD WEST,ORANGE.CALIF 92668• 17141 636-8460 t'heirman of the Huard Carl hvm1a Jul 28 1972 Ntouiton�i�url Rater Diarist July , President and(. rieral.11anuger Lucien f Tnihill l ice Chau•mar,-Itembvrship Relations Beau Clemem Beau Clemens& Associate, The Honorable Ronald Reagan ('ice Chairman t.rt% t:humbers Adcisor.- Str%art I;(rpeke State Capitol Building McDonnell Douglas.4atronautTrexuurean� Sacramento, California Robert L.lianwn - Arthur Youriz&Company Chairman Executivet;ummittPe Dear Sir: E.H.Finster Boyle Engineering President,Senators Club We endorse and support Mr. Robert F. Finnell in his request to Lon Peel.II Peek Farm% Colonial Funeral Hume meet with you to discuss the State Water Resources Control DIRECTORS Board Plan for Ocean Waters adopted by the Board July 6, 1972. Derrick A.Ander-on Frank L.Hope& Associates Mr. Finnell requested that you set aside a time to meet with a Winn Bandv Airporter Inn Hotel committee representing 22 Mayors and S Supervisors of Orange Roy C.Bolt KwiLiet County at your earliest convenience to review the new effluent Donald W.Bodes discharge standards which will increase the capital costs for Airport 4n•i/r.Intorp prated g P Beau(:Irmens the Orange County Sanitation District's Pollution Program from Beal:Clemeli& Ssocia:es R.%.Clifford $38 million -to $96 million. Owing to cash flow needs, the Air Callforrua Edward U.Fttiell proposed program will require an immediate increase in taxes P P g ram Autonetics estimated at from 461� per $100 •assessed valuation to 96C in F.H.Fin�ter Boyle Enginerring some districts of our county. Robert E.Han,on Arthur Young&Company John llaikell Since the standards ado tea are very substantially differentberco,Linuted H.Rodger How-ll from those proposed in public hearings, we believe there has Fentu F.JonTuckes not been sufficient public discussion. Further, no attempt Fenton E.Jones West Orange County NluniclpalCourt has been made by the State to demonstrate that the July 6 Lron R.Jones Jones.Elliott$.A;corlates standards are reasonable and just. Gordon Junes The Irvuw Company Stewart hcepct;e The standards may not be justifiable. For example, limitations McDonnel!Douglas Astronautics Company AlKoch for sewage discharge to the ocean specify arsenic to be five Voorflei-Tnndle K Nelson.Incorporated 1:ail h%'mla times more stringent than that for drinking water; chromium Moulton Nigguuel Uot-r Di tnct standards are ten times more stringent than that for drinking rdI H. Lind:a%-.Jr. Corvi-ilting Englnrrr water. John B.Menril.H W%att& Merrell Joe McCormick The urgency of this meeting is brought about by the immediate Ernst&Em.t MriNiller necessity to change the tax rate structure should a review of BJam,f) �lui•r America the standards indicate the necessity for their enforcement. mp•-D Westinghous, Elertric I.orporation Dale l'u.t First American Title Insurance Companv James R. palter Klmberk (sail:Corporation I it smith Kit-hard Hunt-arsson�nods,Int urp orated Arthur V6.Vagiier Lucien D. Truhill, President Ralph(: Sutro(:onipam I; E rind, for the: Board of Directors SiRna1/Id&liar ailham('A..R'tr•,rp rr n ORANGE COUNTY CHA 4BER OF COMMERCE Huntington Brach(.ompanN- � y F,- A k foi CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OFFICERS 401 BANK OF AMERICA TOWER.THE CITY. ONE CITY BLVD_WEST.ORANGE.CALIF 926M• (714163984W Chairman of the B.=urd Carlkymla July 28, 1972 Not=Itrin Niguel a stet I:I�trict President and General.11ana er Lucien D.Truhill 1'u-e Chazrn an tlember.hrp Relations Rrau Clemens Beau Clemens&A�sor-iates Vice Chairman-City Chambers Advisory Mr. Winn Adams, Chairman Stewart hoepcke McDonnell DuugI.L,A.;tronauti Compan) State Water Resources Control Board Treasurer Division of Water Quality Control Robert E.Ilan-son Arthur Young&Company Room 1015, Resources Building Chairman F_s:ecutiue(:ommrttee E.H.Fin�ter 1416 Ninth Street Boyle Engineering Sacramento, California President.Senators Club Lon Peek,It Peek Farm, Colonial Funeral Hume Dear Mr. Adams: DIRECTORS Derrick A.Anderwn We urge you to meet with Mr. Robert F. Finnell Chairman of Frans:L.Hope& Associates , Winn Bandy the Joint Boards of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange Airlwrt Roy C.Bolt County, as requested in his telegram to you on July 26. Kwik,et Donald W.Rovies Airport Service,Incorporated Mr. Finnell and his committee will represent 22 Mayors and Beau Clemens BeauClemenz-& .Associates the. S Supervisors of Orange County in requesting inquiry and R.a.Clifford Air review into the appropriateness and need for the Standards Californiarnia Edward 0.Ethell specified in the Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters Autonetics F.H.Fimter of California, as adopted July 6, 1972. The urgency for Boyb�rt E.H le t E.Hanionn eeri Ru meeting with this group is that the newly adopted Standards Artl.rr Young&Company will increase capital costs to this from $38 million John I1"ell p county Breeo,Limited to $96 million. Tax rates for the Sanitation District will it.Rodger Howell RUtan&Turker approximately double and immediate action must be taken to Fenton E.Jone>- prevent cash flow problems should the Standards remain as West Oranu= t.ouno Municipal Court Leon R.Jones adopted. Jonr=.Elliott&Associates Gordor,Jones The Irvine Company The standards may not be justifiable. For example limi'ta- Stewart h(wpck. WD nnell DouQla� A•tronaucics(:otnpamy tions for sewage discharge to the ocean specify arsenic to be At Koch Voorheis-frindir&tirl.on,lnco Cdtd e five times more stringent than that for drinking water; chro- rr�p rarlKU�mla Moulton r mium standards are ten times more stringent than that for i irel eater Lhstnct gll If. Ltrid-,a%. Jr. drinking water. (:utl:ulting f:nginr-r•r John B `derrrd.it R'vatl N Nlcm-ll Jot%IcCormtr:k Erna S Erna %lel%Illler dra�la • Bank of %merica Jame'1) 1l"I" Lucien D. Truhill President Westtnghou-.r ial,In, .o oration s lue Po;t for the: Board of Directors l:ir•c Amr Tittr t-.1,.Jm R.:alter Hater .James R.p ORANGE COUNTY CHAMBER OF COKMERCE Klrnberl% (.lark t:.,rpr,retion ttichard J smith 'aunt-A-wor L ood-.Incorponet'.d `/ Arthur lh fir igner halph+ :,utr,�I.rm:pan ( V Riotwi• (..•a-I.UVI111� µplia I nt %. �rrn Iluntlnr,�ir.t jtr;rr•}t ,Rll)dr t } • i - 1' RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS *Ago, 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ! I 3 July 26, 1972 4 On motion of Supervisor Baker, duly seconded and carried, the following 5 Resolution was adopted: 6 WHEREAS, the State water Resources Control Board has recently promulgated a 7 Water Quality Control Plan for the ocean waters of California; and 8 WHEREAS, it has come to the attention of this Board that these standards may 9 vastly increase the cost of treating sewage in this County; and 10 WHEREAS, this Board is deeply concerned that these new standards will have a 11 disastrous economic effect on many industries in this County; 12 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Board does hereby join with the County . 13 Sanitation Districts of this County and the Cities of this County in requesting that t 14 the standards which have heretofore been adopted be re-evaluated and that the State �ZZ 15 ' Water Resources Control Board set a new hearing on this matter and consider addi- �a� 1 -(3 O U"U 16 tional testimony at said hearing. �Fo �Z< Do 17 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of this Board is hereby directed to send U 18 copies of this Resolution to the Honorable Ronald Reagan, Governor, the State Water 19 Resources Control Board, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, and all 20 Cities in this County. 21 22 P CLARK WILLIAM J. PHILLIPS, AND AYES. SUPERVISORS DAVID L. BAKER, RAL H B. , RONALD W. CASPERS 23 NOES: SUPERVISORS NONE 24 251 ABSENT: SUPERVISORS R. W. BATTIN C 26 STATE OF -CALIFORNIA ) ' ) ss. 27 COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 28 I , WILLIAM E. ST JOHN, County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of Super- I visors of Orange County, California, hereby certify that the above and foregoing 29 Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the said -Board at a regular meeting thereof held on the 26th day of July, 19i2, and-.passed"by.:.a,.unanimous vote of said 30 Board members present. 3 11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto;set.:my hand and seal W s 26th day of July, f 1972. ' 32 WI1L TAM E. S► JOH"I, �oanty Clerk tend ex�-officio Clerk or the Board of Super- Resolution No. 72-866 =.���sQrs of Orange County, Cal i forni a Request. Re-evaluation of ;.n C�iP:I b Standards; State Water (`` �''/'• rr� I Resources Control Board nr- e pt,1 y ! COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2020 BEVERLY BOULEVARD Los ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90057 JOHN D. PARKHURST TELEPHONE CHIEF ENGINEER AND GENERAL MANAGER (213) 484-1370 July 28, 1972 Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.0. Box 812 7 Fountain Valley, Calif. 92708 Dear Fred: Reference is made to your letter of July 26, 1972, with which you forwarded copies of telegrams to Governor Reagan and Mr. W. W. Adams, Chairman of the State Water Resources Control Board, with regard to action taken by the Orange County Board of Directors , July 25, 1972, concerning the recently adopted water quality control plan for ocean waters of California. * Forwarded to you are copies of telegrams sent by the Los Angeles County ** Sanitation Districts . The telegrams were authorized by the Boards of Directors meeting in joint session at which time they authorized appointment of an executive committee comprised of five members. This committee plans to meet with members of the State Board and/or the Governor at an early date to pursue possible remedies for what is considered to be overly restric- tive and unnecessary requirements on ocean discharges. Mr. Ted Burnett, Mayor of San Marino who was appointed chairman of this committee, has suggested that joint action by all of the affected agencies might prove most productive in achieving a more reasonable set of requirements . I am sure he would be pleased to hear from other public officials who are similarly concerned. His address is: Mayor T. S. Burnett, 2200 Huntington Drive, San Marino, California 92208. Rvery trul , johnD. Parkhurst JDP:eg Chief Engineer & General Manager Encls. cc: Mr. Robert Bargman Mr. Alfred Friedland Mr. R. W. King Mr. Don Tillman Mr. John La mbie Commission Members, SCCWRP V. ]RE.GIONAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTIPICT JOnN A. LAME CHIEF E�NGIWEER GENERAL U& AGER \/ August 2, 1972 Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Fountain Valley, California Dear Fred: Reference to your letter of July 26th concerning the recently adopted water quality control plan for ocean waters of California, the Ventura Regional County Sanitation District Board of Directors, July 20, 1972, instructed me to prepare a resolution for their action at the next Board meeting of August 17th, which will support John D. Parkhurst, Chief Engineer-General Manager in his position on behalf of the County San--- tation Districts of Los Angeles County and the actions which you have taken on behalf of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. After approval of this resolution I will send you a copy. Very.truly yours, John A. Lambie Chief Engineer-General Manager JAL:mjr P.O. BOX AB, 93001 • VENTURA, CALIFORNIA • 632 E. MAIN STREET . (805) 648-2717 a• ROBERT H. BURKE COMMITTEES MEMBER Rules Y o Education (f ifornia E Transportation alt�islaturt 70th ASSEMBLY DISTRICT July 31, 1972 Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager County Sanitation Districts P.O. BOX 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. . Harper: Thank you for your thoughtfulness of sending me copies of telegrams you wrote to Governor Reagan and the Chairman of the State Water Resources Control Board in regard to the recently adopted Water Quality Plan for the Ocean Waters of California. I would very much like to know the outcome of your proposed meetings and would appreciate it if you would contact me again. Please let me know right away if there is something I can do. Sincerel ROBERT H. BURKE RHB:kh ANAHEIM COSTA NIESA FOUNTAIN VALLEY GARDEN GROVE HUNTINGTON BEACH LEISURE WORLD LOS ALAMITOS MIIYLICAV rtTV RnSSA4nnR SANTA ANA SEAL IsF?:.C'Ii SUNSET BEACH 'XFST\1INSTFR fe TASK FORCE ON LIAISON WITH SANITATION DISTRICTS MEETING - JULY 24, 1972 - 10: 00 A.M. ATTENDEES NAME ORGANIZATION Anson McArthur Orange County Chamber of Commerce John H. Rosser Precision Anodizing, Inc. Van Sommer Hunt Wesson Foods Dorian Swartz Xonics, Inc. Ross Crawford City of Fountain Valley William Gerow Dana Laboratories E.R.West Dana Laboratories Don S. Perkins Dana Laboratories Philip M. Freeman Anaheim Citrus Products C. G. Shoemaker Hughes Aircraft R. N. Marcum Hughes Aircraft Richard A. Zevnik Kimberly Clark Corp. M. J. Kurtz Durkee Testing Laboratories Roy E. Pegram Durkee Testing Laboratories Hayden M. Ringer Barber-Colman Charles E. Bowman Hoag Memorial Hospital Joe Muroney The Register Walker W. Downs Anodyne, Inc . Norman N. Way Anodyne, Inc. Robert W. Wormhoudt Orange County Chamber of Commerce Y. Yohi Kaynar Manufacturing Co. Jose Bueno Kaynar Manufacturing Co. Jack Haslam Nabisco, Inc . C. W. Blodgett Hunt Wesson Foods , Inc . John Kohler Humko Products Merle A. Soden Culligan Water Conditioning Herbert J. Becker Collier Carbon & Chemical Co. Jack A. McGuire Collier Carbon & Chemical Co. James E. Woodbury Cal-Compack Keith Swayne Case-Swayne Co. , Inc . Cliff Potter Case-Swayne Co. , Inc . Duane R. Jordan Kerr Glass N. R. Lynch Kerr Glass Don Lord Kerr Glass Merrill E. Skilling Northrop Corporation Jack Boettner Los Angeles Times H. Rugge Kaiser Steel Corp. Rae E. Houke North American Rockwell Corp. Don Wilkins Autonetics Randy Mizer McDonnel-Douglas Astronautics David Jones V T N Tom Brown AMF Voit, Inc . David M. Maxson St. Jude Hospital Joseph Spira Ecotech, Inc . George Borun Ecotech, Inc. Archie Slowan Battery Systems , Inc . John Bartlett Battery Systems , Inc . Clyde M. Haugan Delco-Remy Div. GMC Lucien D. Truhill Orange County Chamber of Commerce Edward Just City of Fountain Valley Will H. Lindsay, Jr. Sanitation Task Force 1.0, Richard Bueerman California Regional Water Quality Control Board Robert Finn.ell Chairman, County Sanitation Dist . Fred A. Harper General Manager County Sanitation Districts Robert A. Webber County Sanitation Districts John E. Sigler County Sanitation Districts James Wybenga County Sanitation Districts Paul G. Brown County Sanitation Districts J. Wayne Sylvester County Sanitation Districts Gregg Pamson County Sanitation Districts H. Harvey Hunt John Carollo Engineers TASK FORCE ON LIAISON WITH SANITATION DISTRICTS ORANr F COUNTY C I AM3ER OF COMMERCE ENVIR ONMIENTAL• C O TJI\TC IL• MEETING - JULY 26, 1972 - 10: 00 A. M. Present: Approximately 55 representatives of industry and Districts ' staff (see attached list) �.r Presiding over Meeting; Will H. Lindsay, Jr. , Chairman of Sanitation Task Force, Environmental Council; Mr. Richard Bueermann, Executive Officer of California Regional Water Quality Control Board; Mr. Robert Finnell, Mayor Pro Tem, City of Placentia, Chairman of Joint Boards of County Sani- tation Districts; Mr. H. Harvey Hunt, John Carollo Engineers; Mr. Fred' A.7 Harper General Manager, County Sanitation Districts Mr. Will Lindsay, Chairman, called the meeting to order at 10: 10. He opened by stressing the importance of the meeting and effects of the new State requirements on everyone present and all of Southern California. Mr. Lindsay introduced Mr. Robert Finnell . Mr. Finnell welcomed everyone present on behalf of the Board of Directors . He stated that the recent ocean policy of the State Water Resources Control Board presents to this County and to all of the Southern California area, some of the most perplexing and disastrous problems since the inception of the Districts . Examples of how this is going to affect us: Under the new rules, the amount of arsenic allowed in the sewer waters is five times more stringent than what is allowed in drinking water.. Chromium is 10 times more restrictive than in drinking water. Copper, the same amount has to be contained in sewage as in drinking water. As for Mercury, there is no limit set on drinking water, the limit for sewage is 1 part per billion. Nickel has stringent requirements, no limit in drinking water. Silver is 50 parts per billion in drinking water, while in sewage it is 20 parts per billion. Mr. Finnell went on to explain that there have been a series of public hearings with the State Board. The document of July 6th on Water Quality Control for Ocean Water provides no rationale and is far more stringent than what was anticipated. There has been, needless to say, a great deal of research and study by scientists and engineers as to the problems in the ocean and how our discharge affects same . SCCRWPA has been funded for this research and the Counties of Los Angeles, San Diego and Orange, as well as the Cities of Los Angeles and Ventura have been working to find what the problems are in the ocean related to discharge and the possi- ble solutions to them. The new requirements are going to more than double the present tax rate in Orange County. Mr. Finnell stated that a telegram was being sent to Governor Reagan requesting a Committee of Mayors and Supervisors of Orange County hold a meeting to discuss the damaging effects to Orange County by the recently approved regulations . A telegram was also sent to Mr. Winn Adams, Chairman of the State Water Resources Control Board, requesting a meeting for discussion of same prior to the meeting with the Governor. He expressed to the group that they must be in agreement that something has to be done to alter the new regulations and asked that each industry do their part by appealing to their management to contact the Governor personally in hopes of helping to save our economy as the increased tax rate and necessary treatment facilities required of industry to meet discharge standards may force the closing of many small industries. Mr. Harvey Hunt of John Carollo Engineers was introduced. He supplied to the group some background information on what the Districts are planning to meet the new State requirements . He informed that discussions with the Board of Directors brought about plans for stages of construction. The first being, 48 million gallons a day of activated sludge. This stage will give us water that is fit for reclamation and will give us a .high degree of water so that a blend between Plant No. 1 and 2 will meet any future requirements set down by the State . Secondly, we are in the midst of a Master Plan for 75 million gallons a day in two stages at Plant No. 2 and will ultimately have 200 million gallons a day of secondary treatment. Our study will. naturally be determined by the outcome of the State and the Clean Water Act of 1972; hopefully, it will come out in August before the November election. In the treatment processes we will be removing some of the other constituents in the sewage . The metals will be removed in vari- ous degrees through the activated sludge method which we are putting in at Plant No. 1 . The average metal removal will be about 50%. We cannot do the total job here at the plant alone . Mr. Hunt made reference to the three documents put out by the State Board on October 16, 1971, January 25 , 1972, and April 20, 1972. In our hearings with the State , we have not been successful in obtaining any rationale except from the document issued in April. We felt we had considerable in- put and gave them criteria and rationale for our numbers . The final adopted plan changes six of the heavy metal limits which were presented at the last hearing and they are as follows: Arsenic was reduced to 1/5 of its previous value . Chromium was reduced 40 times its previous value. Cadmium remains the same . Lead increased twice . Nickel reduced twice . Zinc is 3/5 its previous value . At this time , we do not know what industry will be able to discharge but Mr. Hunt foresees the following difficulties: Cadmium - Extremely difficult to meet and cannot be done with treatment, must have good source control. Chromium - Essentially a zero discharge. Copper - We feel it is very close to domestic sewage coming from homes, therefore the copper called for is similar to what now exists. Lead , Mercury and Nickel - Will be very difficult. � Silver - A problem all over the County. It is used by photographers, dentists,sts, etc . , and it is felt it is not a basic industrial discharge. -2- •ti These are the problem areas and all must have good source control. Mr. Lindsay introduced Mr. Richard Bueermann. Mr. Bueermann expressed that Orange County presents interesting problems for the Regional Board in that there are presently many pending ocean water problems . In essence, the Regional Board learns of the changes in standards at about I%w the same time as other agencies . Being a regulatory agency, the Board tends to be conservative. In a marine discharge such as we have in Orange County, there needs to be a great deal of concern for the food chain and assurance that it does not exceed the background. The Board feels there is good justification for using the ocean for disposal of waste, but it is imperative that there be stringent controls. Assuming that a plan is adopted sometime this Fall, October or November, we know that these things can not be effected overnight. Any revised waste discharge requirements put out by the Board will have attached to them a time schedule which will provide reasonable time for enforcing same. Mr. Bueermann expressed that the Regional Board is very considerate of our problems because many of its members are people living in this area who better understand the problems in Orange County and the Santa Ana River Basin area. As a result of regulations adopted in the past by the Regional Board, we cannot say that any regulations have affected any par- ticular industry to cause their shutdown. In summarizing, Mr. Bueermann went on to tell of the thought given to the disposal of heavy metal discharges once they are removed from water. The Orange County Road Department has looked at the possiblity of developing an industrial waste dump area in the County. The only ones available at this time are in East Los Angeles and the Riverside area. Mr. Lindsay then made reference to the cost to the Districts involved with the new requirements, $96, 000, 000 rather than the original $36,000,000 anticipated. It was asked if this expenditure is going to be a direct tax increase that might be coming back against industry. Mr. Harper replied that the Districts have projected the cost of constructing the necessary facilities at $96, 000, 000. Hopefully, we will be receiving funds in amounts of up to 80% of this amount from State and Federal funding. There is even talk in Congress of a possible 90%. However, this money is needed in a relatively short period of time, about 3 years, and if everyone does what we think we have to do, there will not be enough money. Tertiary treatment for inland treatment facilities is being considered. Federal grant people indicate because of the demand on funds our percentage may have to drop. Because of funding restrictions placed on the State of California in the past fiscal year, we have lost millions of dollars . To obtain funding, the Districts have to present a financial revenue plan to the State which shows the method of collecting funds. Use charges are being considered . Mr. Harper further stated that we have been advised that the present charges we have are not adequate to cover the industries ' share for covering the costs in our Districts. We should look for an increase in these charges . The program we presented to the State in San Diego would have involved $38, 000,000 and we felt this would have been adequate. The program we now have to consider is a high degree secondary treatment with very stringent source control. At this time, Mr. Lindsay advised the group that they would answer any questions. -3- Question: What percentage of increase in charges should be expected? Answer: Mr. Harper replied that we have no way of knowing at this time. There are three ways in the Ordinance we could go: 1. Consumption of water. 2. Metering of water to the sewer. 1%001 3. Discussion of loss of product water. Question: How will the increase be determined, on what basis? Answer: There are many things to consider such as the type of industry and its discharge. Question: At what point in time do you think these requirements will affect industry? Answer: As provided for in the State requirements, the Districts must submit a timetable to the Regional Board by January 15, 1973 • The Regional Board, upon review of this schedule, will determine a suitable time schedule for implementation of these discharge standards. Question: Who advised that our industrial charges are not great enough at this time? Answer: The State Board. They have guidelines and financial controls to apply to different programs . For the last two years, we have submitted a revenue program which they have reviewed . The big push at the Federal level is that industry not get a free ride. Question: When do we envision the enforcement of the Program? Answer: Mr. Harper answered that in order to comply with the regulations, meaning the construction of the necessary facilities, we are probably looking at January of 1977. Mr. Bueermann stated that another part relys on the people in 'this room. We might have a shorter time schedule . He would hazard a guess at 3 years for industry, perhaps with a sliding scale. Mr. Harper added at this time that the Districts probably have a more complete plan, probably better than any other agency along the Coast. The Districts have anticipated a change in standards and have had a very active Board of Directors insofar as getting out input to the State. One year ago the Districts proposed the metal standards for industry. We would have been the first agency to initiate new standards. Question: The amount of investment and time for various industries to comply with the new standards will vary. Will each industry be given consideration accordingly? Answer: The Regional Board will set the time schedule for the Districts. Question: Will similar stringent requirements for discharge of petroleum and non-petroleum operations be instituted? -4- Answer: Mr. Hunt replied that with our activated sludge process, we can go do..n from 60 mg�1 to less than l0 mgfl for that type of condition. Pilot work at Plant 2 will define what grease removal is with physical-chemical treatment. Can handle 60 parts, cannot say that we can handle any higher. On heavy metals, however, at this time we cannot give you any better than 2 to 1 . Question: Has consideration been given to a location within Orange County for the discharge of concentrated wastes? Answer: Mr. Harper replied that we have given this considerable thought in that too often we have run into a situation where industry has had to dispose of heavy concentrations . This will be discussed at length with the Directors . Question: Is it true that San Diego County has initiated action to question through legal means, the State Board on the legality of these regulations? Answer: Mr. Harper expressed that he had discussed this with the Water Utilities Department in San Diego and there is a problem pending . Question: What about the possibility of joining with San Diego if we do not get results from our appeals to the Governor? Answer: Mr. Finnell replied that we must move as rapidly as we feel is necessary because of the tax rates which have to be established next month. Here, he cited what the tax increase could mean. For example , in District No. 2, an increase from 460 to 920 is expected . These new regulations could force the closure of some small businesses. He earnestly again requested that those present consider this problem and contact the Governor and State Board as to their deep concern. The cash flow problems are such that we have to attack this problem this year. The Directors will have to give consideration to possibly doubling the tax rate. -Our Staff makes certain assumptions of what revenue we will receive but must plan on a do-it-alone basis. Question: When will the Water Quality Control Act be adopted? Answer: It is not determined at this time. It could be next month or next year. Question: Will the inland restrictions be as great as on the Coast and what about other States? Answer: Mr. Hunt stated that inland restrictions will be greater as they will have to go to tertiary treatment. As for other States, it depends on Federal regulations . Question: How close is Orange County today to approaching these new regu- lations? Answer: Mr. Hunt replied by citing an example of our existing chromium limits being .3 to .35. The new requirements demand .005 mg/l. -5- Question: What is the schedule for a dump in Orange County to handle heavy concentrations? And, doesn' t the Porter Cologne Act require that the Regional Board provide provisions for same? Answer: Mr. Bueermann replied that the Board does have to provide the impetus . This will happen when it is demonstrated there is a need and this new plan certainly indicates the need. Also, the location i-s the difficult decision., The problem with getting funding for this is that the Federal and State programs are not strictly for industry. Question: Is Orange County faced with double use taxes next month? Answer: Mr. Harper answered, we do not think so. One of the problems is the way federal funding arrives and it is always after the fact. We have to anticipate a cash flow problem. Question: What is the fiscal year for the next rate increase? Answer: We do not know for sure at this time . If it is set for August, it will appear on December ' s tax bill. Assembly Bill 1000 is a tax reform bill which would freeze tax rates at 72--73 level . This is naturally of concern looking at the construction programs we are facing, but then we would have to look to some other type of funding . Assumptions have been made that 80% funding would be available from State and Federal sources on the facilities required to meet these regulations. The cash flow problem creates the tax problem. Question: Why is there a special problem in Districts No. 2 and 3? Answer: Districts 2 and 3 support 2/3 of all the activities in the Districts. Question: Who will control the source control? Answer: Mr. Harper replied that the Districts will be the policing agency by setting up a monitoring control on industry. The regulatory agencies will in turn set up a monitoring program on our effluent discharge. Question: Are we to understand that if the treatment plant can remove 50% of the discharge, we can then release twice the amount as in the numbers group? Answer: Yes . After we receive requirements from the Regional Board, we will publish a defined set of numbers for industry. In closing, Mr. Lindsay informed the group that information regarding the new regulations could be obtained by contacting Mr. Robert Webber, Chief of the Industrial Division. He also acknowledged Mr. Truhill ' s presence and stressed that the Orange County Chamber of Commerce is willing to cooperate in any way possible to .solve our problems . Mr. Truhill then proposed to Mr. Lindsay, as Chairman of the Task Force Project, that they take the necessary steps to study ways in which a disposal facility in Orange County may be established for acceptance of toxic waste materials . The meeting adjourned at 11 :3 0 A.M. Joint Chairman Fi r.nell (1) Presentation of gavel plaque to former Joint Chairman Just. (2) Presentation of Certificate of Completion to Paul Torres, who has satisfactorily completed thirty semester units of accredited college study and the prescribed two year training curriculum for Apprentice II, with special emphasis on engineering in the process of waste water quality control. Paul was one of the first six in the Apprentice Program. Upon completion of the Apprentice I Program, Paul passed an examination to qualify as a water treatment plant operator for the City of Santa Ana.. After being with the City of Santa Ana for approximately one year, he returned to the Districts and entered the Apprentice II Program. Paul, who was born in Hawaii, resides in Santa Ana with his wife, Azalea. (3) The Bill (AB 2146) authorizing the Joint Boards to limit Directors ' fees for attending multiple meetings has been signed by the Governor. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS �-� �I r�`� TE L ECODE E 4 oj(��_. ��„� iy AREA CODE 714 OF ORANGE COUNTY CAL FORMA u\ �: 540-291 1 ��z-z�.1 P. O. BOX 6127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) August 9, 1972 CERTIFIED MAIL Mr. Jo Andrew Schlange General I-Ranager Chino Basin Munic:i.pal Water District 8555 Archibald Avenue Post Office Box 697 Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Award of the Construction Contract for the Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reach 1, Contract No. 2-14--1 The Board of D!*rectors of County Sanitation District No. 2 will a:-rard a contract for the construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reach 1, Contract No. 2--14-:1., to Sully--Miller Contracting Company, Long Beach, on September. 6th.o Please advise if_' your agency intends to exercise its option_ to cancel the Wastei-rater Interceptor Capacity and Waste grater Treatment and Disposal Agreements dated. April 12, 1972, ten days prior to the contemplated award date of September litho Fred A. Harper General Manager FAH: j Enclosures cc : Mr. John 0. Nelson, Ass 't. Chief, Div. of Water Quality Control, State Water_ Resources Control Board Mr. Frank Covington, Director, Air and "�-Tater Programs Div. , Environmental- Protection Agency t,Mr. Richard Bueerman.n, Executive Officer, Californ-La Reg. Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana River Basin Mr. Don Stark, Clayson, Stark, Rothrock and Munn, Attorneys at Law S tIrk COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT v''�r0N �./` ~�ba TELEPHONES: c�� AREA CODE 714 540-2910 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Coo 9 6 2-2 41 1 P. 0. BOX B127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 9270E 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) May 3, 1972 Chino Basin iMunicipal Water District P. o. Boy: 697 Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: J. Andrew Schlange General Manager Subject : Waste V, ater Interceptor Capacity _Aµzreement At an adjourned meeting on April 27, 1972, the Board of Directors of Couinty Sanitation District ;To. 2 received, filed and approved your request to extend Upper Districts ' option to withdraw from participation in the Santa Ana River ?nterceptor, fron. the date of opening of bids to 10 days prior to the contemplated award date. J: - Wayne' S ivester Secretary of the Board of Directors Jl-,S:rb it ! CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL April 19, 1972 a3 J. ANDREW SCHLANGE Mr. Fred Harper, General Mana ge r GENERAL MANAGER TELEPHONE (714) 957-1712 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10944 Ellis Street Fountain Valley, California Dear Mr. Harper: In folloVgup to the conversation betv,een 1.1r. Schlanae , Mr. Harper, and .,r. John ?Nelson on April 13, 1972 in Sacramento, it is our understanding that Orano:e County Sanitation Districts is issuing an addendum extending tcie bid award date to 120 days after receipt of bids for the Orange County Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reach One, to allow as much time as possible for the acquisition of. ;rant funds . Our current contracts indicate that this District may withdraw from the Interceptor and Waste Water Treatment Capacity Con- tracts to the date of bid opening only. It would be appreciated if that withdrai_�.al. period could be extended, coedit �cned cnly on the fact that the grant offer -could not be forthcoming, to 10 days prior to the contemplated award date . Very truly yours, Carl B. Masingale President CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT " /bd 8555 ARCHIBALD AVENUE- POST OFFICE BOX 697- CUCAMONGA, CAL!FORNIA 91730 - �... CARL B. MASINGALE RAY W. FERGUSON ERNEST L. KEECHLER ALEXANDER R. TOBIN JACK F. COMSTOCK PRESIDENT VICE-PRESIDENT SECRETARY DIRECTOR DIRECTOR directors and administra- Cash Flow Problem Water Blending �, �,�,�a ,� Treat n R les Lion;' Fred Hat-per, gener "Now it appears we will Water produced at each of manager of the dis- have to go back and revise s, plant will be blended and tricts, said Thursday, our entire project," Har- i injected into the under- ' MayTriple Costs for County A committee was ap- per said, "\Ve will have a ground basin to halt :ea- cash flow problem and it water intrusion and to e?: pointed Wednesday night looks like the Avork :will pand and upgrade the . Compliance With Stricter State Regulations Could Hike to work with l,os Angeles have to he done by Jan- freshwater supply. County Sanitation n i�s-. uary of 1977. Treated sewage water Outlay for Upgrading Districts' System to $95 Million tricts to seek a rehearing "It appears that the dis- will be piped to the reela- before the Water Re- tricts will have to go into mation }slant from the sa- biological secondary treat- nitary districts' facility. BY JACK BOETTNER sources Control Board• ment. and place more and•the salty water rli,-:i Times Staff Writer Named to the committee stringent controls on in- charge from the wafer far,- I FOUNTAIN VA11,h;Y---The cost mile-lone; outfall, trunks and sub- were Placentia f'ouncil- dustries who are discharg- tore will he piped into the of complying with new state,reg;ula- trunks—discharges an average of man .Robert N'innell, 1•oun- ing into the system." Sanitation I)lslr;;•ts' out- i r Lions un treated sewage discharged 138 million gallons a day of treated fain Valley Councilman Ed Harper said it, is too ear- fall near the mouth of the into thr` ocean :ill be neatly three waste water iota the ocean, ly yet to determine :what Santa Ana hirer. ,'times more than anticipated in•Or- ltisagainstthisdischargetliatthe Just, Santa Ana Mayor effect the discharge policy Water rdistri2t officials ange County. tough state regulations will be ap- ren Griset, Buena Park will have on industry. He had expected the tight A plan by the seven County San!- plied.Among the restrictions are the , Councilman Jesse Davis plans to invite industrial con4rols and say that they ` tation Distrusts to upgrade treat- removal of all sludge,a sharp reduc- and Norman Culver, a d!- representatives a Or- will be. able to make ad- of ment facilide, here and in Hunting; tion in the amount of floating matter rector for t h? Garden ange County Ch.- ton just meals to meet them. tun leach would have cost between and the prohibition of high-level�a- Commerce memh( o a Thev admit., hrnve:•er, $3ii million and $:'8 milLon. dioactive waste material. Grove Sanitary District. meeting in his office July that the input of :nFp r But compliance with restrictions The control-; are aimed chiefly at 'member of the Board I 26 t.o evaluate the limita- into th,: dischat iiiie adopted lust week by the State Wa- preventing continued ocean deter•i_ of Supervisors also :will be .j wtions. 'from deter•ieratin. tubes ter ite,^rrce= C��ntrcl Board :eott'.d oration: �rtid ridding the beaches of named to the committee. l It is alsn ton early. Her- � in the d�salt.ing plant ,v'll. ttre c: to?r suet t : ml- bacteria and gene,: <c. Natirer, who ;aid the I per sa-A, ,n make an.ace, .r- 1 ha:s 'o ae watciued lion ::rlc: •:..ill minion, ci;>:;riot ciiree- Tl e :a«,ealip:v:ec: cis;enarge pot- di-t:;ci :vas r•PpresenrMi at ate pre-iction on 0w 1 to , ::cre told ll�edne.�cday night• rcy::i11 trot itecome effective until it all three ,tare puhiic hear- much more in taxes will -It will oe up to the vrat•�r Ilowever•, about 80`0 of the higher is sanctioned by the federal En- ings on discharge require- have to be paid in Orange district ro pay for any ad- costs said: County for the installa- ditinnal cost- in meeti:: ! � fedtn•nhandr�:�t<ae grr�nte•covered by vironmental 1'rutection Agency. "The policy is a complete sinus. t > ;t is state discharge P stand gas t Orange Cuturt.� sanitation chiefs reversal of ;lie way that g" - hat area ns the estimated amount knew ti rhtca limits were coming � He said ocean discharges at the A ater Factory. { to be rariscd from county propet•ty and were preparing to meet them. things have been moving. from 1Vater Factory 21 taxes in the districts would climb They frail poceedc:d, they said. on It is far more rigid than 1 may also exceed allowable s front V mill:on to between: $17 mil- the basis of testimony presented apt that proposed by the limits Iracause of copper in i lion and$1:)million. three Water Resources Control board's o:vn staff." the hrine. About 1..3 million persons live in Board hcarin�s the last on;+larch 11 Harper said the districts The $22 million project the area; served by the Sanitation of this year. o had hoped to have a treat- is snider construction at I District,. Generally, the service re- however, the extent and severity ment program in opera- Ellis Ave. and Ward St., ' fun ! bounded Lry the lrviirc Ranch of the regulations "were unexpected Lion by 11►7h that ;would near The :Vwage treatment and the I.o; Angeles County line. and frankly came as a shock to the fulfill state requirements. plant. `rhe factnr•v will fen- The sewage-luinlling �ystern_in- The plan, was to install ture adjacent. waste water (eluding two treatment plants,a fi\.,e- s o p bi,ticated treatment reclamation and seawater facilities at. Plant. No. 1 in desalting plants. Fountain Valley and some new treatment equipment Los Angeles Times, July 14, 1972 at Plant. No. 3 in Hunting- ..ton Beach. j t ` OL I I cn'i F 11 �a ci2s t °1 ° rf i v, �A ion 0i Ala By JOL4' AIUROINI;Y Alayor Clifton Miller of Tustin Register Staff Xi—iter advised prompt action in Sacra- FOUNTAIN VALLEY — The mento and Washington to tem- Orange County Sanitation Dis-iper the new rules. He said they tricts face an epexpenditure of i liad been promulgated by the ? about $85 million in t.iic next sixiShte Water Resources Control • to :eight years if they are to I Board "without benefit of sound comply with state regulationslknowledge." adopted July 6.on the duality of 1 T:,;o disposal plants now give - waste water discharged into thelprimary sedimentation treat- ocean, district directors were!mcnt to the great bulk of Or- Od Wednesday night. lane County se«weage before it 'General cotmsel C. Arthur,is discharged through an ocean Nisson said counsel for the Losloutfall five miles at sea. All Angeles County Sanitation Dis-Igresser solids are screened or .tricts had contacted hirn during!se'tied out and the effluent is the day, telling of the cost out- heavily chlorinated. A small look there and asking if the amount of waste water, sold Orange County distracts would i locally for agricultural purpos- go along with Los Angels Coun-les, gets secondary treatment. ty-and city in seeking a rehear- Under the new regulations Ing on the regulations. lboth plants will have to be' Nisson said he was told Los i converted to give secondary 9 Angels County faced an outley treatment as well. Under this of-tM to $600 million and the I system minute suspended sol- city of Los Angels "vias in the;ids, except the stubborn heavy same condition or worse." Helmetals, and most of minuteor- saidit was estimated the coast-imetals, and most of minute or- al•.counties froin Ventura southiganie material is converted to a would need to spend at least $ilsoil-like substant in an actiratedl billion to bring the quality of 1 sludge process. The sludge may ' ocean-bound sewage up to the'not be discharged at sea. tough new state standards. ! The s t a t e restrictions on Xa.yor Robert F. Finnell of,heavy metals going through out- Placentia .had just taken his I fils will give the worst trouble, l seat as newly elected joint 1 according to Hunt. These in- chairman of the Orange County 1 elude copper, nickel, cadmium, districts, succeeding Y dward E.I lead, silver and chromium. Just of Fountain Valley, and IMost of these can only be elimi-I 1 Councilman Jesee Davis of I nated at their sources, and engi- Buen moved up Park had mov up to neers fear to do so may involve vice chairman when the finan- crippling curbs on some Orange vial bombshell broke. County industries. 1 � � rip (Lit '� • ` 4 Ocean Semage By JOHN ZALLER construction of 1 i05 million worth of new The new requirements will demand Of the Daily Pilot Staff secondary ti•eannent plan., directors greater than 85 percent removal. A bid to overturn sections of tough new were told. But sanitation staff memt-�rs In addition, the new rules deal for the ocean pollution standards was lodged stressed that cven this amount ,%ould not first time with the so-called heavy metals Wednesday right by directors of the insure compliance with one or two sec- such as mercury, lead, copper, and Joint Orange County Sanitatior.Districts. tions of the new rules. chromium. Angered by reports that treated '1Ve all knew a were going to be hit Harvey Hunt, an engineering con- sewage will be held to standards more by these new reR;llations," said Fountain sultant to the district, told directors the stringent than those for drinking water. Valley Director Ed Just. "But we didn't new restrictions are tougher than those the directors voted unanimously to seek expect it to be this bad. for drinking water and will be."next to t a "rehearing, revision, or something" of `Something has to be done, but I don't impossible to meet" for chromium. the ocean pollution regulations approved know how far we're going to get in the Hunt also took issue v;ith the standard last week by the state Water Resources current atmosphere." for mercury contamination, which has Control Board. (See related story, Page The sanitation district c u r r e n t l�� been limited to one port per billion parts 101• removes about 40 percent of the organic water, because he saes he knows of no "It sounds like Proposition 9 all over material from 150 million gallons of instrument that can detect mercury ac- again," commented one irate director. sewage per day and then dinnps it into curately at that level. Meeting the new standards will require the ocean five miles offshore. Since there are no feasible methods for ,_.,,.a�,.- ..•.. — -- -- ...- ._:._�.`...__ removing heavy metals from huge • volumes of waste water anyway, Hunt continued, the only option night be to forbid their discharge into the sewer system. "This means the regulations may have their greatest;ffect on certain industries who will no longer be allowed to discharge into our system," Hunt said. ; "Some may be forced to move or go out of business." Sanitation District manager Fred Harper said he was most disturbed by the ":ay in which standards '`jumped around from meeting to meeting" of the , State later Resources Control Board. Ile said the toughest part of the stand- ards were added gout of the blue" at the final hearing of the state board. + Harper alsq repeated his complaint that the new requirements didn't seem to be founded on any scientific fact. Amplifying Harper's remarks, legal counsel C. Arthur I\isson said the new regulations are "rather arbitrary." "I'm sure all of us want to do what is best for the ocean," he said, "but there are limits to what can be done with the limited resources we have to work with." Previously, sanitation officials had said that meeting the new requirements would cost $i7 million over the nett three years. 'cdnesd, they said the cost would be "5 million over six to eight years. \i��on said that Les Angeles 4 County voould have to spend Y600 to $300 million. "I think we should work together to get a reviev;, rehearing, or sornethin, of these requirements," \isson said, "They ought to be more realistic." 'Ir 7- 9 Sea . Outfall' ' Laws V lews . 'slW3111-1 oll is .101IN /AL1.ER RCALIN^S Control Board. a measurab!e benefit to'the should be madi, on tL•e side of cc- rin tits ht:;r� ;r,ctaa or :re val1Y Pilot s,a+f They require removal of environment will result. But if ocean safety. sue: as lead, merc r:•y, and.; New ocean outfall regula- more than E5 pereent of all there aren't any measurable copper. These, he cl;.ittts, ae- l tions dt:manding purifiention orranic material and the benefits, then 1 question the "BUT I THINK the regula- tually exceed rcgt,irentents 1 of all Orange County sewage virtual climinat.ion of all toxic standard," harper said. tions are reasonable con- for human drinking, ,•,r!er•. to near drinking-water stand- metals such as lead, mercury, siderung the present state of '•Thc decisions have been . arils h a y e created sharp and copper. BUEERMAN OF the Water knowledge. The object is to made for political reason not" divisions of opinion between Quality Hoard admits sane of preserve the ocean for the scientific ones," Harper said, the two a;encies most af- CLEANING THE 150 million Iiarper's charges, but defends future," Bueerman said. "We'll canply with them, of fected by the tough new rules. gallons of sewage Orange the regulations stoutly. Harper , is particularly course, but I believe they are'; Fred harper, director of the Count- produces each day to "The ocean is extremely_ unhappy about the regulations _overly restrictive." Orange C o u n t y Sanitation Comply with these will require difficult to understand," he District, charges that the new $75 million in new construction said, "so tt►cre are some regulations are too restrictive, of treatment plants, according areas in which the state board too little understood, and not to sanitation d 1 s t r i c t was not sure, and maybe even berPd o-t sci.en!ific f:,ct. estimates. To the owner of a some in which it went out on a typical $30.000 home. the cost limb. RICHARD Bueerrnann, ex- breaks down to S25 to'$•10 an- "There was a feeling that if ecutive officer of the Santa nually in higher taxes during an error was. to be Made, it Ana Regional State Water the three-year construction �_.. ._ .—.....�. . Quality Control Board, praises period. the new rules and says they "If someone is going to r are re::sonahle steps to take in quire this much construction the prot&,lion cif the offshore he should know will, the marine cnvirnnlnelrt. benefits will be. But no one. 1'he new regulations—said to does" claims Harper of the be the toughest o c e a n sanitation district. discharge standards in the "The general thrust is good,` United States—were approved but it goes too far. We'll glad i last week by the.State Water ly do whatever is-necessary it 1 Agenaa item -ito4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 August 8. 1972 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 August 2, 1972, Meeting for City Personnel to Discuss the Sanitation District No. 2 Proposed Annexation and Connection Charge Policy Present ; Milo K. Keith, Keith and Associates (City of Brea) Bob Perry, Garden Grove Sanitary District Ross Johnston, Garden Grove Sanitary District Walt Bressel, Garden Grove Sanitary -District Robert Main, Garden Grove Sanitary District Richard 0. Rafanovic, City of Garden Grove Wayne S. Osborne, City of Fountain Valley Alfred J. Stabile, City of Placentia John Burk, City of Santa Ana Gale Grant, City of Santa Ana James Maddox, City of Anaheim Don Martinson, Lowry and Associates Wm. F. Cornett, City of Fullerton Jack L. Royer, City of Fullerton John V. Fonley, City of Orange Don E. Smith, Chairman, District No. 2, CSDOC Fred A . Harper, CSDOC Paul G. Brown, CSDOC Robert Webber, CSDOC Hilary Monahan, CSDOC Paul Hogan, CSDOC John E. Sigler, CSDOC The meeting was chaired by District Chairman Don Smith, and the rationale for the proposed District annexation and connection charge policy was given by the District ' s engineer, Don Martinson. A number of concerns were expressed by those in attendance: (1) They wanted to know if the proposed connection charge would ,be limited to just District No. 2 . (2 ) What happens if a city will not agree to collect the District ' s connection charges - how will the connection charges then be collected? (3) Could the District legally enjoin a city from issuing a Building Permit? (4) What about the people who own undeveloped property and have been paying taxes all these years - why should they have to pay an additional charge when they develop their property? (5) Why is the District proposing to lower the current annexation charge of $369 per acre, to $273 per acre ? Several questions were directed to the proposed industrial charge ($50 per 1000 square feet ) : (1) How about the person who is building a warehouse - will he be charged the same as a like-sized facility which requires a substantial amount of sewer service? (2) Would it be possible to assess industry a charge based on the size of the water meter installed? Those in attendance agreed with the Districts ' philosophy that those who use the sewer system should pay for it; however, they did not particularly agree that the connection charge would provide the desired equity. Comments of the representatives of the following cities or agencies : Orange - This is like so many of our problems, conditions have changed to such a degree that it is very difficult to come up with 4 or 5 pages in a document that will solve the problem. It has to be fair to those here for a long time in proportion to their future development. Not always is the basis of vacant land as it should be as zones change depending on the needs. Now concepts are changing. Areas of high and low density concern us and we look for over-all density but it may be concentrated with open spaces around it. The answers are very difficult to come up with. Peel it will have to be a combination of many things probably including some thing related to water con- sumption to determine use of sewer system as one area, ad-. valorem taxes to finance certain capital improvements as another. Do not think we can come up with connection fee and annexation fee to cover everything. Brea - There has been no staff reaction to the proposed documents . Council Utility Committee and the entire Council have looked at this. They were divided; some thought we should go in on tax rate because of increase water use and taxes. Others thought, let the user pay, was the proper way to go. We did ask the City attorney as to the legality of whether fees can be collected by the -City or not. Garden Grove - The first representative passed saying he had given his thoughts previously today. Second representative thinks, in one sense,, with these charges we are discouraging high density which he is in favor of, but thinks we are also discouraging industrial development which is highly needed. Third representative felt there is either too much or not enough. Need density equity, capacity required, quality, fairness and constitutionality. He believes we should strive for equities. Seems to him the entire thing should be deferred until we know what we will be faced with in water quality standards and if everyone should be involved. He thinks County Sanitation Districts could raise taxes and get by with it. If we are going to collect from those who have not used, this is another problem. ,%Ole The fourth representative felt the assessed valuation income figures should be brought up to date. The City of Garden Grove representative finds the format inconsistent with the City' s development objectives . He wishes the method of collection would be at least supportive, not opposing to their policy. Fountain Valley - City Council has passed many ordinances to encourage industrial development and they feel this is not consistent. Other thing would be annexation fee should be on a variable basis so that as the replacement cost of the system rises, the annexation fee would escalate. Placentia - Believe eventually it will be a combination of raised taxes and connection charges. Present homeowners are contributing more than anticipated.. Other imbalances that have to be looked at more closely. Santa Ana - Think with the changes that have been mentioned here, particularly the annexation thing, it looks like an equitable way to go. District 7 is working out all right with no large problems there. Second Representative - If the cities do the collecting of the fees, do not feel the 4% figure that is mentioned in the agreement is sufficient to cover costs. Anaheim - Do not feel that this method of connection �r charge is really accomplishing what should be accomplished. Probably a more equitable way to do this would be on outflow. Perhaps based on water usage might be as near as we could. come . It was mentioned that that would be a use charge. If it goes this way, would suggest that in Paragraph 2, Page 2, the wording be changed which now reads "the connection charge shall be $50 per 1000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction", to 1000 square feet of gross floor area. The other comment is on the agreement. It would seem if the City is to collect the fees for the Sanitation District and . then receive a certain percentage of the monies, it would make more sense for the cities to take out their percentage prior to sending the monies to the Districts, rather than sending the entire amount to the Districts and the Districts then returning their percentage. The funds would go into a special fund that would be used for construction of District facilities but could be put into use as a part of improving quality of flow, If the projects within. the Districts were completed and there were funds left, and we could reduce the tax rate from other sources, the funds could be used. Fullerton - Generally affirmative. Think fee is inadequate for processing. Think it should be a minimum of $10 per connection for a permit and then 4% over $500. The biggest job is going to be justifying the connection charge to the public . Second Representative - Agree with concept. Feel in the . industrial portion perhaps an additional modification could be worked in and base this on actual amount of water used so as not to discourage industrial use. If cities have to collect fees, it might make it easier to justify and explain to the major industrial developers. This would be a one-time fee for residential, multiple, etc . , and for industrial, a different schedule . Could be set up on water units within the building. The general conclusion of the District Chairman is that there was genera_ concern that the Board was dropping the annexation charge and then adding a connection charge throughout the District which would not be fair to the taxpayers within the District. It appeared to those in attendance that a general subsidy is being made for those properties presently lying outside the District. There was also concern among those present at the meeting that the connection charge policy discouraged industry from locating within the District. Considerable dis- cussion centered around the method the District currently obtains its revenues and the likelihood that the revenue source for the District would be changed in the next several years to a sewer service charge because of State and Federal regulations . It is recommended that the special committee be reconvened to review the detailed comments of the August 2nd meeting, and to make further recommendations to the Board, Don E. Smith, Chairman County Sanitation District No. 2 OFFICE OF: .T "Co�1tY ta _ '• Administrative Officer C" I-r\/ Of a REF: C I V I C C E N T E R • LA H A B R A , CALI F O R N I A 9 0 6 3 1 August 4, 1972 County Sanitation District of Orange County, California P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager Dear Mr. Harper: The City Council took action at their regular meeting of August 1, 1972 , by minute order to adopt a proposed annexation connection charge policy, excluding industrial sites or industrial connections, with respect to Sani- tation District No. 2. Very truly yours, Lee Risner ��-- Administrative Officer LR:dh . Agenda Item No..,..��., !� AGREEF4ENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into as of the 9th day of August, 1972, by and between ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, hereinafter referred to as 'Water District" and COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, of Orange County, for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, hereinafter referred to as "Sanitation District". RECITALS : A. Water District is a public corporation created and governed by the Orange County Water District Act (Uncodified Act 5683, Stats. 1933 CH 924, as amended) . B. Sanitation District is a public corporation organized pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act (Chapter 3, Part 3, Division V of the Health and Safety Code) and is a party to the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement dated March 10, 1971 between itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos . 2, 3, 5, 65 75 and 11, and amendments thereto. C. Water District is authorized to acquire, construct, operate and maintain facilities necessary to augment and protect the quantity and quality of the water supplies within its boundaries. D. Sanitation District is authorized to construct, maintain, and operate such works as may be necessary to conserve and put to beneficial use any water or sewage effluent recovered from the opera- tion of their sewage plant or works by discharging the water or sewage effluent in such a manner as to percolate into the underground gravel ... and replenish the natural water resources . E. Sanitation District has heretofore adopted Resolution No. 971 encouraging the reclamation of waste water originating in Orange County and providing for delivery of said waste water for said purpose. F. Water District has determined that it is feasible to reclaim said waste water, if the reclaimed water is mixed with desalted sea or brackish water, for use in its Coastal Project which is necessary to augment and conserve the water supplies within Water District. Water District intends to construct a waste water reclamation plant (hereinafter referred to as "reclamation plant") and a desalting plant on its property located at Ward Street and Ellis Avenue in the City of Fountain Valley, adjacent to Treatment Plant No. 1 of Sanitation District for said purpose. G. Each of the parties hereto are authorized to contract with each other to carry out their respective powers, authority, and purposes. H. It is to the best interests of Water District and Sani- tation District to enter into an agreement to utilize the waste water from within the respective Districts in Orange County for reclamation and use in the Coastal Project of Water District and to provide for disposal of the waste brine discharge from Water District 's desalting plant. AGREEMENTS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, covenants and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows : 1. Delivery of Waste Water Sanitation District shall deliver to Water District and Water District shall accept delivery of reclaimable waste water from Sani- tation Districts ' Treatment Plant No. 1 for use in Water District 's reclamation plant. Delivery and acceptance of reclaimable waste water shall be at no charge and on a continuous basis, except for Acts of God or other emergencies, and at a rate of fifteen (15) million gallons per day from the effective date hereof to July 1, 1976. On or before July 1, 1976, Water District and Sanitation District shall evaluate the net value of secondary treated waste water and modify this agreement accordingly, effective July 1, 1976. Such evaluation .e2_ ' will recognize the value added by Water District from water supply project which result in an improvement in the quality of waste water tributary to Sanitation Districts ? Plant No. 1. After July 1, 19765 Water District and Sanitation District shall, at any time, at the request of either party, repeat said evaluation and modify this agreement accordingly. 2. Quality of Waste Water The waste water delivered pursuant hereto shall be waste water which has received secondary treatment by means of high rate biological filtration or equivalent treatment. 3. Discharge of Desalting_ Plant Sanitation District will receive into its disposal facilities the waste brine discharged by Water District from its desalting plant at a rate not to exceed 15 million gallons per day or the simultaneous rate waste water is received by Water District from Sanitation District, provided however, that if Water District finds it necessary to exceed said simultaneous rate it shall pay to Sanitation District, during the period from the effective date hereof to July 1, 1976, an amount Equal to $30.00 per million gallons per day for such excess discharge for each day said simultaneous rate is exceeded. Subsequent to July 1, 1976, said charge shall be adjusted annually on the basis of the ratio the then current Engineering News Record Index for Los Angeles bears to the April, 1971 Index of 1550. After 1990, the amount of waste brine discharged shall at no time exceed fifty percent (50%) of waste water delivered to Water District by Sanitation District. 4. Discharge of Reclamation Plant Waste Water District Sanitation District does hereby grant to Water District the right to discharge its normal sewage and incidental waste as well as the waste from operation of the reclamation plant into the transmission or disposal facilities of Sanitation District in a manner and in locations approved by Sanitation District. Said discharge to transmission facilities of Sanitation District shall not exceed a peak flow of 100,000 gallons per day. For the discharge of said sewage and waste, Water District shall pay to Sanitation District -the actual -3- treatment costs of Sanitation District for the fiscal year in which said discharge takes place. In the event said discharge exceeds a peak flow of 100,000 gallons per day, Water District shall pay to Sanitation District a charge computed at $75.00 per million gallons discharged. Subsequent to July 1, 1976, said charge shall be adjusted annually on the basis of the ratio the then current Engineering News Record Index for Los Angeles bears to the April, 1971 Index of 1550. Said charges will be invoiced and paid annually not later than October 1 following the end of the preceding fiscal year. The points of discharge from the plans and specifications for the discharge connection facilities shall be approved by Sanitation District. 5. Charge for Excess Suspended Solids In the event the discharge from operation of- the reclamation plant into the facilities of Sanitation District contains a total amount of suspended solids in any one day in excess of the amount of suspended solids contained in the waste water delivered during the same day by Sanitation District, Water District shall be subject to an excess solids charge computed at $17.00 per ton (dry basis) of such excess suspended solids. Said charge will be applicable to July 1, 1976, and will be invoiced and paid annually not later than October 1 following the end of the preceding fiscal year. Subsequent to July 1, 1976, said charge will be adjusted annually on the basis of the ratio of the then current Engineering News Record Index for Los Angeles to an Index of 1300. Said charge may also be adjusted after commencement of said discharge by Sanitation District in the event the cost of removal and treatment of suspended solids is determined to be materially increased by changes required by regulatory agencies having juris- diction., or otherwise . 6. Quality of Wastes Discharged The quality of discharge from desalting plant and reclamation plant shall conform to current applicable quality standards and regu- lations of Sanitation District, provided however, that the temperature -4- of the discharge to disposal facilities of Sanitation District shall not exceed 85 degrees Fahrenheit or such temperature as may be mandated by regulatory agencies having jurisdiction, and that the total sus- NNW pended solids content for any one day in said discharge does not exceed the total suspended solids content in the waste grater delivered to Water District during the same day. 7. Water Quality_Monitoring Water District shall establish and maintain a water quality monitoring program for the waste water delivered from Sanitation District and for waste waters discharged by Water District to Sani- tation District facilities . Said monitoring program shall be approved by Sanitation District, subject to changes from time to time caused by changes in operation of Water District desalting and reclamation operations or by changes in requirements imposed on Sanitation District by any regulatory agencies having jurisdiction. Written reports of the results of said monitoring program shall be submitted by Water District monthly to Sanitation District, not later than 15 days after the end of each month. 8. Commencement of Delivery and Discharge . The delivery of waste water and discharge of waste brine and other wastes provided herein shall commence as of the completion of the construction and commencement of operation of the waste water reclamation plant and the desalting plant by Water District. 9. Facilities Facilities for delivery of the waste water by Sanitation District to Water District and the waste discharge lines shall be constructed and operated by Water District at Water District ' s cost and expense pursuant to plans and specifications approved in writing by Sanitation District. A recording and totalizing meter shall be installed and properly maintained upon the waste delivery facilities, waste brine delivery facilities and each of the waste water facilities from the reclamation plant which is capable of measuring the flow therein, at Water District 's cost and expense in accordance with -5- plans, specifications and maintenance procedures approved in writing by Sanitation District. 10. RiGht of Way for Facilities *r Sanitation District shall license Water District to construct pipelines and one injection well site on property owned by Sanitation District necessary for the construction, operation and maintenance of the waste water delivery, waste discharge and waste brine discharge, injection well facilities, including the use of temporary areas for the construction of said facilities, without cost to Water District. The location, design, and specifications, of such licensed facilities shall be approved by Sanitation District . The expense of any future relocation of said facilities, if required by Sanitation District, shall be borne by Water District. .11. Modification Needed to Meet Discharge Standards In the event it becomes necessary to modify any facilities or treatment processes of Sanitation District to meet the discharge standards set by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, or agency having jurisdiction of such discharge from time to time, Water District will pay to Sanitation District that portion of the cost of .such modification, which is attributable to Water District's operations under this agreement. If modification of Water District ' s facilities is necessary to meet such standards, Water District shall make such modifications and pay the cost thereof. 12. Modification of Treatment Facilities In the event it is desirable to improve the quality of the waste water delivered by Sanitation District in order for Water District to reclaim it and the parties hereto agree, Sanitation District will modify its treatment and appurtenant facilities or processes. Water District will pay 'to Sanitation District the actual costs incurred for said modification. 13. Term The term of this agreement shall be 30 years from the date hereof. -6- 14. Hold Harmless and Indemnity Water District shall, and does hereby, agree to indemnify �.r Sanitation District against and to hold Sanitation District harmless from any and all damages, claims of damages or liabilities of whatso- ever nature arising out of the, or in connection with, Water District' s operations hereunder, including the use of the licenses which may be granted as provided herein. Sanitation District shall, and does hereby, agree to indemnify Water District against and to hold Water District harmless from any and all damages, claims of damages or liabilities of whatsoever nature arising out of, or in connection with, Sanitation. District ' s operation of its sewage treatment plants and sewage transmission and outfall facilities. Water District shall require of each of its contractors, with whom contracts are made for the construction, operation, maintenance or repair of facilities to be constructed for the delivery of waste water and discharge of waste brine and other wastes as provided for herein, to agree to indemnify and hold harmless Sanitation District from any damages or claims for damages, including costs and attorney's fees incurred in defending any such claims, which may arise out of such contracts or contractor' s activities . Water District shall further require each of said contractors to provide workmen 's compensation insurance and comprehensive and contractor' s liability insurance with limits of not less than $500,000 for injury or death of one person and $1,000,000 for any one occurence and not less than $500,000 property damage. Said contractor shall be further required to cause Sanitation District to be named as an additional insured in the comprehensive and contractor's liability insurance and to furnish a certificate of waiver of subrogation under the terms of the work- men' s compensation insurance. 15. Arbitration In event of a dispute as to the interpretation or implementation of this agre:.�ment or any rights or obligations hereunder, the issues -7- a in dispute shall be submitted to binding arbitration. (California Code of Civil Procedure, Title 9. ) For such purpose, an agreed arbitrator shall be selected, or in absence of agreement each party shall select an arbitrator and they shall select a third. Said arbitrator, or three arbitrators acting as a board, shall take such evidence and make such investigation as seems appropriate and shall render a written decision on the matter in question. Decisions in the arbitration shall be binding on the parties and may be enforced by the Superior Court in Orange County. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the day and year first above written. Approved as to form: ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT RUTAN & TUCKER BY BY General Counsel Presiden By Secretary Approved as to form: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 MILLER, NISSON & KOGLER of Orange County By By -General Counsel Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of D rectors ,g_ Joint Chairman Finnell (1) Presentation of gavel plaque to former Joint Chairman Just. (2 ) Presentation of Certificate of Completion to Paul Torres, who has satisfactorily completed thirty semester units of accredited college study and the prescribed two year training curriculum for Apprentice II, with special emphasis on engineering in the process of waste water quality control. Paul was one of the first six in the Apprentice Program. Upon completion of the Apprentice I Program, Paul passed an examination to qualify as a water treatment plant operator for the City of Santa Ana. After being with the City of -Santa Ana for approximately one year, he returned to the Districts and entered the Apprentice II Program. Paul, who was born in Hawaii, resides in Santa Ana with his wife, Azalea. (3) The Bill (AB 21146) authorizing the Joint Boards to limit Directors ' fees for attending multiple meetings has been signed by the Governor. Joint Meeting - August 9 1972 #7 - Report of Joint Chairman Reported on Special Committee on Rehearing for new State water policy for oceans. Sent telegrams to Winn Adams and governer on July 26th. Discussed situation with Adams on 26th & 27th on phone, and FAH met with Bill Dende. When Adams returns from vacation, will attempt to meet with him and governer. Met with industrial representatives on 27th to explain effect of new standards . As a result, Chamber of Commerce of Orange County has also submitted their position on it to the governer and Winn Adams reiterating our request for a meeting. Resolution on agenda actually gives them a timetable for improved treatment of the facilities . Districts will take the necessary action to meet state and federal laws in effect at the time of the construction of improved treatment which is 1975. This is required (resolution) prior to granting approximately $4 million in grants . Unanimous opinion of Committee that state laws are far more stringent than what is required environmentally in the ocean. Hopefully, the law in effect now will not be the one in effect in 1975 . 0, QR. -@ 7 3 *8�,v.,v.EO. #8 - Report of General Manager Reported on CASA Conference. Joint Chairman Finnell could not attend, so Just went in his place. Outstanding program. Orange County was well represented. Director Kymla presented program he has developed in S.E. part of County for reclamation and sewering ksm±±#kkms services for developing area there. Don Owen presented Water Factor 21 program. Along with Harvey Hunt, Districts presented program on industrial waste . Attorneys Committee met and discussed in detail Environmental Impact Statements . Had Assistant Attorney General from State in charge of Environment & Consumer Protection to outline various aspects of Environmental Impact Statements for construction of public facilities . Also engineer from SWRCB and representative from EPA . Legislative program of Association has been effective this year and have submitted well documented report covering activities in Sacramento . Would be happy to prepare copies of report if desired. #9 - Report of General Counsel Reported that Peter Kiewitt is suing(sp) the Districts and engineers . Demurrer to complaint argued in March and got ruling about 10 days ago sustaining demurrer. Plaintive is now going to amend his complaint . Received a call from General Counsel for Peter Kiewitt and he was very happy with decision and would like to effect a settlement on a very reduced basis. Nisson has no recommendation on settlement . Also mentioned CASA Conference and said he found some valuable information and viewpoints on EIS that we are going to be required to produce on each project . Established a good liaison with other agencies . Large part of time discussing impact of ocean discharge requirements . Discussed proposed Watson Amendment to constitution and possible impact it may have if adopted . If legislatures did not effect some kind of tax relief, which' it has not done, there is an excellent chance for adoption of Watson Amendment . Material on probably or possible effects of amendment available if Directors are interested. -- p. 2 #9 (Cont . ) Green: What happens if we are told we have to spend $30 million or so and we can't raise tax rate? Nisson said one of sponsors of Amendment says we will have to collect in some other way other than on tax roll. ($. 10 per John) Kymla moved that Executive Committee should put item on Committee agenda to study Watson Amendment and report back to the Board. Motion was seconded and carried. Finnell: #11(a) - Federal government has taken position that they require Resolution of Intention before they can favorably consider grants . There are two specific grants before them directly now and a third one indirectly. Board has always shown a positive attitue in complying with regulations and do not have history of dragging our feet or just paying lip service to regulations . We wanted this completely understood with federal government before we would recommend approval of this resolution. While we will meet whatever laws are ; in effect , we do not intend to leave laws presently in effect . ,u ,r� f Language in resolution now allows us to agree to meet the intent r1�uJ jlr white still with idea to have regulations changed. 1' Green asked if there was further contact with Orange County legislators and what was the result? Finnell said he asked FAH to call each legislator' s office and read telegrams that were sent and follow them up. Have received3etter from Burke & Briggs and will meet with Carpenter this week. At the present time they are xa saying if we need their help, let them know. Carpenter wants a complete rundown on it and will give him that Friday in meeting. Has there been any action from federal government? Finnell : Adams vacation came at in- opportune time. Talked to his office yesterday and they indicate Adams will call here to see what this misunderstanding is that he felt we had. Finnell indicated he didn' t think we had any misunderstanding, and didn' t agree with some alternatives . Committee does intend to set something up with Adams when he returns from vacation and hopefully meet with governer. Question asked if any other agencies taking any action along this line? Finnell answered that after we sent telegrams , LA Sanitation Dists . also sent same type telegrams and they feel the same as we do . Question: What dictates the July 1, 1975 date? This time schedule is in accordance with state requirements and ties into federal legislation. Are letters being written? Finnell answered yes, and after receiving some of the letters, a man in governer' s office he talked to asked him if these requirements were really as stringent as for drinking water. Board of Supervisors took action on this and League of Cities have also taken action. Have advised industrial firms to indicate to government how they feel. #11 (b ) - New item XKKKXXXJ�X1IK General Counsel has prepared a petition for rehearing on behalf of the Districts . Nisson explained Districts position which is that we are contending that they didn't have a public hearing as required by law according to the definition for "public hearing" . Other thing is that they should have to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement on affect of this plan on entire State . They are saddling everyone else with these so should have to do it too . Are not asking to rescind regulations completely, but to consider modifications and to justify their position or produce some evidence that what they now have will be of benefit to the ocean or we shouldn't have to comply with this . In no way do they consider the right to discharge into P. 3 #11(b) (Cont. ) the ocean as a right to protection. (??-.if that makes any sense to you) Goleta may also join in petition but plan to have other agencies file their own. Motion was made to approve this petition. Finnell requested that it be signed by Chairman of each District, and Griset stated that he wanted that included in his motion for approval of petition. Motion was seconded and carried. Winn wondered why each major Sanitation District has to do this individually. Said somebody should get all Joint Chairmen and Managers together and get SWRCB replaced or something. Finnell answered that we have attempted for last three weeks to provide coordinated approach. Will keep trying to coordinate efforts but plan to move forward. Griset said his council mentioned that the efforts expended here will have to be backed up with an expenditure of money and he would like make a motion to provide whatever is necessary . Nisson added that he could write everything up but needs someone to testify about it . Should authorize this type of thing. Griset moved that up to $5,000 be authorized for necessary expenses for staff to implement these changes in regulations . Motion was seconded and carried. #17 (b ) Didn't say much here . Just that the only thing that he knew was gained from negotiations was that agreement is now written in language that can be understood and is straight lbrward. Couldn't understand before. Complimented McInnis for his work on agreement . #37 - FAH just repeated what is on agenda. #46 - Motion was made to make formal request to LAFC to request that consideration of annexation of Irvine Ranch Water District be held off until late September. Motion was seconded and carried. Kymla asked that it be recorded that he abstained from that vote . Nisson said if District was annexed to Dist . 5, they would not be entitled to membership on the Board. Is provision in Health & Safety Code to allow IRWD to have representative but purely at discretion of the Board of Directors . If annexed, would overlap in District 5 and 8 . #64 - Reported on meeting with staff and members of Cities ' staffs . Need more meetings. Would like to set up Committee meeting for the 31st . Anyone in District 2 that would like to attend is invited. Herrin asked if there was any/time that FAH would like to have this action taken by council? particular He answered no . Should send out communication indicating that Committee is meeting again and will report back to them after Board reviews any suggestions . Use same procedure as before . Culver recommended that at same time District 2 meets that District 3 Committee be mkkf notified and meet with them. Joint meeting between the two committees . Battin asked to be removed from Dist . 3 Committee, but Culver will get someone else. p. 4 #65 - FAH reported on meeting with people of EPA. One of the things they tried to impress to people handing the grants in San Francisco is that we couldn' t be delayed any longer. Not just for ourselves but '*WO for Chino people who are participating with us for construction of line. Opened bids May 11 and kxxmxxdxaxad at advice of State Board people, made award date 120 days from bid opening to give them sufficient time to review project . Project is part of the S.W. Basin Plan. This line is for high saline waters of upstream agencies to be transferred to ocean rather than underground. Three alternate sizes of pipe on bids . 50 mgd - takes care of immediate needs of our Districts . 80 mgd - takes care of our needs and 30 mgd for upstream. Third alternate increases the capacity by 122% for 22% additional cost . State agrees that if Directors decide to go to largest pipe, would go along with Alternate 2 and then issue a change order for larger pipe. However, federal people are concerned about any type of program that would increase growth capacity in the So. Calif. area. Suggest that we have a meeting on the 30th of this month to discuss this whole thing with idea that by then we should have grant offer and Chino ' s position on facility within next 10 days. Found out Friday morning it had a low priority as far as grant processing, and Monday morning it was NO. 1 priority to get grant out . Having a Director along at meeting to express Board' s opinion did help. Copy of letter in folders to Chino people asking them if they are going to excercise their option to cancel the two agreements they have. They have until the 23rd to back out of the program. Question was asked what happens if Chino backs out? Man at EPA told FAH that he would talk to him on the 24th if Chino backs out on the 23rd. They feel it is essential that they go along for this Basin Plan. Finnell pointed out that our cooperation had about run its course. Everybody has said that Basin Plan had to be taken care of above everything. Upstream agencies keep backing off. Somehow have to get pipe up the river to take care of our own people . Directors feel time has come to get some pipe in and want to cooperate but have to do something now. Have come to the end of the string. Smith suggested should have meeting on the 30th at 7 : 00 p.m. Chino indicated they have put program together and are just waiting on grant. Martinson said talked to grant people and they said they felt grant would be out in four days. Smith thanked Finnell for attending meeting in S.F. since he could not attend. #68 - Winn asked if Executive Committee has on agenda sometime in future idea of engaging a lobbyist , for our representation, at least in the Sacramento area. He moved that this be put on their agenda. Motion was seconded and carried. . Fox mentioned that previously it had been stated that our membership in CASA is suppose to take care of this . FAH stated that maybe we could ask advocate of CASA to make some kind of presentation and give more time. Maybe could be at next Executive Committee meeting. Motion was made and seconded to have him come (I think) . EXCERPTS FROM THE MI1,UTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATIOP, DISTRICTS NOS. 15 2, 33 5, 6, 7 and 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County �.r Sanitation Districts Ilos . 1, 2, 35 5, 63 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7: 30 p.m. , August 9 , 19 72 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7: 30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District ' s Board. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to August 30, 1972, at 7: 00 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9: 17 p.m. , August 9, 1972 . STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS. COUNTY OF .ORANGE I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each df the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos . 15 25 35 5, 65 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 9th day of August , 19 72 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 9th day of August, 1972. . 1 S cre .1 ZT .e of. s of Directors of C iTt.y anitatior Districts Nos. 13 21 J,. 5 6, _7, and-- 11 5-107 EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT 14EETIIIG OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NIOS. 13 25 35 53 63 7 and ll, OF ORANGE COUrITY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County � Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 35 55 65 7, and 11, of Orange County, California., was held at the hour of 7: 30 p.m. , August 9 , 19 72 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7: 30 p .m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District ' s Board. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: ' Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to August 29, 1972, at 4 : 30 p.m. at Newport Beach City Hall . The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8 : 51 p.m. , August 9 , 1972 . STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos . 15 25 33 5, 65 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and .correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the . 9th day of August , 19 72 ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 9th day of August, 1972. Je net ��f he-B a1lcs of Directors retCo ty S _ itation Districts Nos. 13 23 3,_- 5, e;7,- and _rl S-107 - - -