Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972-06-14i I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92709 10944 ELLIS AVENUE {EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) June 8,· 1972 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 Gentlemen: The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, · 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, will be.held: Wednesday evening, June 14, 1972 at 7:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Tentative adjournments prior to next regular meeting: Executive Corrunittee District No. 2 Districy No. 5 5:30 p.m., June 27 5:30 p.m., June 29 4:30 p.m., June 21 at Newport Beach ·city Hall TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 SOA•lDS OF OHU'.CfORS County Sanit<3tio11 Distrids of O rang~ Co unty, Californ ia BOARDS P. C. Sox 8 1 27· 1081+1; Ellis /,ye .1u'= Fountair. Valley, CcliF., 92708 ·~~~~~-·=~-============================ I! June 1 4, 1972 -7:30 p .m. (1) Pl edge of Allegianc e and I n v ocation f ')) \, L. ROLL CALL VOTE .... _ Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairman pro tern, if neces sary (4) EACH DISTRI CT COii.sirfer7a.tion of mot1ons approv:i.ng minutes of the followin g meet ings, as mailed : m l ~ District l \\Jay 10, 19'72 regular M/~ District 2 May 10 , J.972 regular and May ,., lJ 1 972 ad j ourned c:_ ' ' /II\/~ Dis.t1•ict 3 May 10, 1972 regul ar .M. I'S Dis t riet 5 May 10, 19'72 regular jtll. /S District ,.. 0 May in 19?2 :r.·egu l ar ._,} Ma.y 10, 197 2 regular le [;i ~t-,,i ct· 7 .;1/1 l-> ... ·-l -v f l lE ................. . l EITE R ·······••···•• m(s District ll May 10, 19 72 regular A/C •••. TKLR ··@· . 5) --·-HH••H•O .. •oO•o o -J!n:r· ........... . LEITE~··:::~:@}) A/C .... TK LR .... ALL DIS'IRIC~:·s nepcirt-c~T-"CE e Joint Chairrn2.n ALL DIS1'RIC'I'S Report of th'e G8nel"al f.12.nager ......... ::::::~:::::\":? ) G~a.l Counsel f l l Ell ............ +8) ALL DISTRIC1'S AO JOUR:ii.!ENTS POSTED .. !("' CO\\'.P & r.~iLEAGE .... Y.".'.'.': ... FILES S!:T UP .. -···-~ .. RES OLUTiONS CERTIFIED./ LETT ERS WRITTEN .... ~ MINUTES WRITTEN ... /.' .... MINUTES HLED .•..... ~ .. LETTER ····-···-····· A/C .•.. TKLR .... -Repo1:;t-o~~tr :ie Exec: u.ti ve Comrr.i t tee a nd l'.onslde:ra ticn of motion to recelve and file the Corr~ittee 's '1'._,.-················· Nri t t e n -r eport I .......... -....... -........ . (9) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of a c t i o n o n iterris r ecomme nded by t°he Executive Committee : FttEt> .• 9 Consideration of motion directing the staff lETTER -~ •.. ___:_ and engineers to proceed with preparation o f Ale .... TKL R --· a pro ject report for construction of 46 mgd ·······················-act i vated sludge faci l ities (seconda ry ···········-······--<i!!V. ... L. __ _ l EnER .f..6_:\'_ (b) A/C .••. TKLR ;Nl /s ·······-···-·-~· .. ··- ·••••••••···•·••-U••--- file····--.......... , @ lETTER -·····-·· .. ~-..,_a) A/C --.TKLR •..• \l '-·--················(Y\ S:> ..... -················-······· (d) ROLL CALL VOTE ......... -.~- (e) ~ZM \~ A/C •.•. TKLR ·- ·------·---.......... ._ ---0 0HOU00000,000.0 ...... ~LE) ..... ~ ..... (f) ~-V-::- A/C · .. ~.k(' FILE ···········-···- (g) ~---·:i.L !{) \ ~ •••. TK LR ••.• treatment) at Plant No . 1 Considerat io n of motion authorizing the General Manager to bid an amo u nt not to e 'xce e d $10 , 00 0 for purcha se of a used 30,000 gall on per day act i vated sludge p i lot plant fro m t he East Bay Municipa l Utilities District Considera tion of motion approv i ng 197 2 -73 per sonn e l requirements; and adoption of Resoluti on No . 72 -82 , amending Posit ions and Salarie s Resolution No . 7 1 -3 , as amended . (C o py in meet ing f o lders) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving t h e 1972-73 Joint Operating Budget Conside r at ion of motion dire cting the General Man ager to advise the Districts ' aud iting firm, Hanson, Pe t e rson , Cowl es & Sylvester, Certified Public Accountants, to discontinue quarter ly r epo r ts i n co nnection with the annua l audit ; and directing t he staff to submit quar terly , a meaningfu l report reflectin g t he finan c ial act i vities o f the Districts Cons ideration of mot io n to receive and file le tter fro m Districts ' consulting engi neers , dated May 11, 1 9 72, reco mmending partic ipation by Di stricts Nos . 3 and 11 in the const ru ct ion costs of a port i on of t he Interplant Influent ' Interc eptor , Job No . I-8; and direc ting th e General Co u nsel to prepare an agreement between the Districts providi ng fo r addi tional contributions by Dist ri cts Nos . 3 and 11 to th e constr uction cost of the Interplant Infl uent Interceptor in the fo ll owing amounts : District No . 3 Dis tri ct No . 1 1 '.l1 0TAL See · page _11_D_'_'~- $1 )18 9 ,000 1 89 ,000 $1 )378,000 Consideration of Resolution No . 72 -83 , appr o ving and authoriz ing exec ution of Amen dm ent to the Joint Powers Agreement Creatin g t he Sout hern Ca l i f o rn ia Coastal Water Research Project Au thority See page 11 E " Consideration of mot ion au thorizin g appointment of Special Committee o f Directors to review wi.th management the comp e nsation of Districts ' Department Heads and report its rec onune ndat i ons to the Joint Boards . -2 - (1) ~-Al~ ~c~ Consideration of motion accepting proposal of Osborne Laboratories, Inc.~-dated May 10, 1972, for conducting in-process pipe testing for the 1972-73 fiscal year at no increase in per diem fees. /'-··········-··--(j) r,;.....·-······---, Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to accept federal and state construction Fiill~FC,~ ~ .. 7 ~ UTTER __ 1 grant offers containing special conditions, to the extent said conditions are consistent with the State's water quality plan for the ocean waters A/C -•. TKLR -of California. fllE -·-(k) ~IY\l~ Consideration of Resolution No. 72-84 authorizing District No. 1 to execute amendment t~ extend lease with Marshburn Farms for land at Plant No. 1 for a period of A/C •••• TKLR •••• -················· '-·-···········.(lO) ~~D 9 FILE_~ lEnER •••.... { .. l,.l) A/C .•.. TKLR •••• .... -...................... . ............................... (12) one year. See page "F" ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to convene in executive session to consider personnel matters ~ 1'}--,B'~ ALL DISTRICTS Nominations for Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. See page "G" ALL DISTRICTS * * * * * * * * * * CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered separately in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar~ Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. FJU:i') ................. . lETTER ••• _ •• J.§l ) A/C ··@.:/ ----·-··-···-·········· ,..._ ......................... ,, (b) ~.t;:;. -- FILE ···-············· LETTER -~·-···-·-· A/C •... TKLR •••• Consideration of Resolution No. 72-85, determining the prevailing wage rates to be paid by contractors on Districts' construction qontracts; and rescinding Resolution No. 71-88. See page "H" Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to issue a purchase order to J~hn Stang Corporation for purchase of 14 inch Fairbanks Morse Model 5720 pump and appurtenances at a net trade-in price not to exceed $3,500,plus tax and freight; and author:izing the staff to proceed with inst -..llation of pumps and an'(:;11rtenances to increase capacity of Sunflower Interceptor Interim Pumpi~g Station. See page ur" --- -3- FILE .••.......• .(.-&) LETIER -·····- , A/C .... TKLR -- --·--····-··-··-- .......... ---·············- Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to award purchase of Commercial Grade Ferric Chloride , Specification No . P-018 , to the lowest responsible bidder for an amount not to exceed $15 ,000 Consideration of Resolution No . 72 -86, approving agreement with County of Orange for 1972 -73 in-place density te sts to determine relative compaction of backfill . See page 11 J 11 ·--~~Consideration of motion authorizing the General ~-~~=2 Counsel and/or General Manager to file necessary r~R-l egal actions i n connection with coll ect ion of A/C ···· delinquent accounts for fees and charges levied ··············---~ pursuant to District services ···---··---- (f) Consideration of motion author i zing attendance of FILE .................. the J oint Chairman and General Counsel at the LETTER~Jnn:i~l ".'orkshop ?f t~e Ca li f?rnia Association of A/c ·--~ San1 cat 1on Agenc ies in San Die go , July 19 -22 , --··-··-------1972; and authorizin g reimbur sement for trave l, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred ... ·-··-··--·--' (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any (1 4) ALL DISTRICTS Co n sideration of motion authoriz in g the General Manager to ~designate members of the Boa rds and/or staff to attend M meetin gs, conferences, faci li ty insp ections, and other !'I ·~unctions within the State of California which , in his ~~pinion, will be of value to the Districts;.and authorizing -·-·····-reimbursement for expenses j_ncurr ed (Expenses o f meetings "·-··-·-·-authorized last year $261) (15) (16) ~o.,._ ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file cer tification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda , found them to be in order , and that he recommends authorizati on for payment ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of rol l call vote mot i on approving Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving warrant books for signature of the Chairman of District No . 1 , and authorizing payment of claims li sted o n page "A" FILE ···········--r17) ALL DISTRICTS -Other business and communications , i f . any . LmER ·-----(a ) Consideration of motion authoriz ing the General Manae;er to ................. I ( 18) l f\ .s. 1rtt ~ (1 9) ffi \~ issue a purchase order to Ecomatics for purchase of four chlorination units for sum.mer,1972 plant odor control projects , in an amount not to exce ed $4 ,760~ p lus tax DISTRIC TS 3 & 11 Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants , if any . See page "B" DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any Se e page 11 B" (20~ISTRICT ~ bil::ier busi~--s and con1m~tions, ~Y i·.~ (21) DI STR IC T 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (22) DISTRICTS 5 & 6 ~1 of motion appro·vying susper~~e fuud warrant s, ·if any . See pa:ge 0 B11 (23) If} 1~ (24) ·~~,~ (25) g ·.2><\ (26) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any See page "B" DtSTRICg,\ 5 O~r bu~ness~ comm~cations~if any DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn to June 21, 1972, at 4:30 p.m. at Newport Beach City Hall DISTRICT 6 ~onsideration of motion approving warrants, if any •Sec page "C" (27) ~TRICT ~ ." Ot~. busi~_ and comrmnlica tions--;~!!Y N\\.S (28) i-.~'\ . '· ~(29) ~~E~ LE~~ +'~ (30) (31) (32) 'i'.37 I ( 3 3) r<\ s. fh/~ ( 34) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn to June 21, 1972, at 4:30 p.m. at Newport Beach City Hall DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to request a proposal from Keith & Associates for engineering services in connection with design of Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 11-12 DISTRICT 11 ' Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any·· Sec page "C" W§TRIC'¥=>.ll \. Other bus'iness and "s..Qmmuni~ons, ~any DIS 1rRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants, if any. See page 11 C" --- DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion accepting proposal of Boyle Engineering, dated May 23, 1972, for engineering services in connection ~ith preparation of plans and specifications for replacing siphon in Greenville-Sullivan Trunk at Warner Avenue and Greenville Street, for a lump sum fee of $2, 350. See page uK 11 (35) DISTRICT 1 (36) ~ (37) <6·.~1 (38) FILE---- LETTER --i'V\\ ~ A/C •.•. TKltv J..\ __________ .......... __ ........ ,~ ..... .... ~consideration of ffietion approving ~arranta, if any • See page "D" D TRICT 1 Otti _ bu~~s and ~unicati.ons, if any DIS'l1 RICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 7 (cU..~ ~\ ·&""') Consideration ot motion to receive and file letter from J. W. Klug Development Co., Inc., dated May 26, 1972, requesting annexation of T~act 6232,in the vicinity of Meads Avenue and Santiago Canyon Road; and r~fer to staff for report and recommer:dation. See page "L" -5- : . :~L~E~--~-~~~ D ISTR IC T 7 TKLR , . Staff report on proposed sewerage faciliti es to serve A~-~ portions of the Orange Pa r k Acres ar ea (Copy in meeting f older) -.. -----·---- --~) LETTER -~- A/C .... ~I~ (41) F!iE _.:. .. ~---- tmER ···---··- A/C .... TKLRWL l S. _ ....................... ,, ............................... FI LE ··-···-·ill ) LETTER·- ~~~-~::::.~\~ FILE ····-----L 4 3 ) LETIER ···-··- ~~-~--:~~~LR ~ \ ~ ~7-7 44) LETT ER···-- A~~-~::~1.:.:.!L l ~ FILE ............... 5?5 ) ~-L-. ~mm-/~ --·-···········------ (46) /V\, i~ ~ 1Yt l'°S ( 48) FILE ·······--S.:...O 3 ff ···-~ A/C .... TKLR -~ ··················-······~ ~ ~Ti:P'D ~ A/C .... TKlR - DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving Chan ge Order No . 2 , to the plans and specifications for Red Hi ll Interceptor , Reaches 6, 7 a n d 8 , Job No . 7 -6 -4, authorizing an add ition of $665 ,53 to the contr ac t with Northern Contracting Company . See page "Mn DISTRICT 7 Conside ration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 , to the p l ans and spec i ficat i ons for Red Hill Interceptor , Reaches 6, 7 and 8 , Job No . 7-6-4 , a ut horizing an adjustment of engineer 's quantities and a total addition of $2 ,905.55 to the contract wi th Northern Contracting Company. See page DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 4 , to the plans and specificat ions for Red Hill Interceptor, Reaches 6, 7 and 8 , Job No . 7-6-4 , granting an extension of time of 32 calendar days to the contract with No rthern Contracting Company . See page 110" DIS'l1RICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No . 72 -87 -7 , accept ing Red Hil l Int erceptor , Reaches 6 , 7 and 8 , Job No. 7 -6 -4 , as complete and authorizing e xecution of a Notice of Completion. See page "P'1 DISTRIC'I' 7 Con side r at ion of motion to acc ep t proposal of Boyle Engineering, dated Jun e 8, 1972 , for engineer i ng services in connection wit hfrP prep ara tion of plans and specifica t ions for master planned Jamboree Road Su bt runk No . 1 , for a lump sum fee of $1,400 . See page 11 Q11 DIS'l1 RICT 7 Consideration of motion to rec e ive, file and den y claim in the amount of $42 .47 submitted by Takeshi Kosakura for alle ged dam ages incurred in connection with construc t ion of Sunflower Interceptor , Reach 3 , and Red Hill Interceptor , Reaches 4 and 5, Contract No . 7-6 -3, as recomme nded by the General Counsel DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving warrants , if any See p age 11 C" ·--- D~TRI~ ~ ~ ~~>! c IY\ ~~"'-" c.a) Ot h'G r l::>u~ess a~communications , if any DISTRICT 7 ~A_JL Consider a tion of motion to adjourn 9 ·. ~ U -·--d.? DISTRICT 2 Report of Special Committee for Studying Annexation and Conn ection F ee Policies DIS'rRICT 2 Further con siderat ion of r e quest of Anahein1 Hills , Inc . that annexation fe es for 1,024.87 acres of proposed Anahe im Hil ls Annexatio n No . l be p aid in five equa l annu a l in s t a ll- ments on the t a x bill . See page __ 1~fl~"-- --6- (51) . DISTRICT 2 · r~J Consideration of Resolution No. 72-46-2, authorizing Fite •... (:.t/ initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 1, 3 37. 2Li ~ ~'\/' acres of territory to the District (proposed Annexation ~ No. 6 -Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 1), subject to ~~-L -certain conditions to be met by the proponents of said ~---··---annexation. See page "S" ,~-~;;z·u;cDISTRICT 2 ~ ~) lffiER-- A/C .... TKLR ·- \ .. (55) M/S ( 56) Consideration of motion to receive, file, and accept proposal submitted by Lowry & Associates, dated· June 2, 1972, for engineering services in connection with the following: Preparation of plans and specifications for the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Katella Avenue to the Riverside Freeway,and the Robert F. Finnell River Crossing, for a basic fee of $107,920. See page "T" Preparation of a project report in accordance with the guidelines of the State Water Resources Control Board on a per diem fee basis with a maximum of $8,500. See page "T" DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to receive, file, and accept proposal submitted by Lowry & Associates, dated May 30, 1972, for ~ engineering services in connection with the preliminary design of the Yorba Linda Pump Station and Force Main, Kraemer Interceptor, Palm Drive Interceptor and the Carbon Canyon Interceptor, on a per diem fee basis with a maximum amount of $50,000; said fee is a part of the final design fee and is to be deducted therefrom upon implementation of final design. See page "U" DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motlon authorizing the General Manager to request a proposal from Richard Terry & Associates for preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement for the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Katella Avenue to the Riverside Freeway, and the Robert F. Finnell River Crossing DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "B" ~TRICT 2'. ~ Otlfur busirless and comm~ications, if any DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn to June 29, 1972, at 5: 30 _p.m. -7- ( "\ Post Office Box 8127 MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Distri~ts of Orange County, California l 0844 Ellis Avenue Fountain· Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, June 14, 1972 7:30 p.m. · Areo Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 June 9, 1972 The following is a brief explanation of the more important non- routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and wh ich are ·not otherwi se self-explanatory. Wa rr ant lists are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but will appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting. Joint Boards No. 6 -REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER: As· stated in the previously mailed report of the Executive Committee, the staff will report on the latest development s concerning the new Federal water pollut~on control bills and also on the status of regul ations of the State Wate r Resources Control Board for ocean disposal of wastewater. Nos. 8 and 9 -REPORT OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND ACTIONS ON COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATIONS: The Committee met on the evening of May 31 with Directors Fox and Root as guests . A report of the meeting, together with recommendations to the Joint Boards was mailed on June 7 . Item 9 (a through k) is consideration of actions recommended by the Committee to the Joint Boards. No. 11 -NOMINATIONS FOR JOINT CHAIRMAN AND VICE JOINT CHAIRMAN : As provided in the Joint Boards' rules of procedures, nominations for these two offices are held at the reg ular June meeting, ~ith elections to take place at the regular July Joint Board meeting. No. 12 -CONSENT CALENDAR: The following agenda items fall into this category in accordance with the definition establ ished by the Boards : (a) Annual Construction Wag e Ra te s Resolution -The State Governm e nt Code require s us to a d opt periodically a reso- lution determining the prevailing labor r a tes fo r public works construction contracts. Since this resolution is quite leng thy it is not included in .the agenda material ~lthou g h it will be available for inspection at the meeting . It should be emphasized that this resolution does not establish wa g e rate s for our employees but d oe s so for employees of contractors engaged in construction work for the ·Dist ricts. · r~··· n (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) Increase in Capacity of Sunflower Pumping Station.-Included with the agenda material is a memorandum from our Mainten- ance Superintend ent on the above subject which shows that the Districts can save approximately $7500 of the cost of providing necessary increase in capacity in this Station by following his recommendations. We recommend that the procedure set forth i n his memorandum be authorized by means of the motion appearing on the agenda. Purchase of Ferric Chloride Coagulants -Next month the experimental sediment ation basin at Plant No. 2, designed to use chem ical c o agulants to remove additional suspended solids and g r ea s e, will be completed and ready for service. As stated i n J ohn Carollo Engineers' letter of June 2, included wi t h the Executive Committee report, it is necessary to experiment with methods of improving treatment at Plant No. 2 in o rde r to be in a posit.ion to decide how to meet the proposed State Water Resources Control Board's ocean water quality plan. In order to obtain meaningful data on the effective ness of chemical coagulants, it will be necessary to purchase these materials and proceed with the experiments at the earliest pos sible date. We therefore are soliciting bids for purchase of ferric chloride, one of the coagulants to be used. In order to save time, it is recommended that I be authorized to award the purchase to the lowest responsible bidder for an amount not to exceed $15,000. Renewal of re eme nt with Oran e Count for Soils Testin F or a nurn er of y e ars we h a v e c o ntra cte d wi t h the Oran g e County Road De p a rtment for determining compliance with compaction requirements on trunk sewer installations. We have found the arrang ement quite sati s factory and the fees reasonable and recommend extension of the agreement for one year. Authorit for Le al Action ainst Delinquent Industrial .lE.ste Pe rm i ttees -Th e Ge n e ral Coun s el recomm ends that he be given a u t hority to i nitiate appropria t e l egal a ction aga inst indus trial waste discharg ers who a re delinquent ih f.ees and cha r ge s payab le under. the Di s tricts' uniform conne ction a nd use ordinance. Two such firms a re at ·present d e linquent and any necessary action against them should b e t a ken soon. Authoritz to Att e nd California As soc iation of Sanitation Agenc ies Worlrn hop -It is r e c omme n de d t h a t the Boa rds authoriz e t he att e ndance of the Joint Chairman and General Counsel a t the next such work shop t o be h e ld in San Dieg o on July 19 t hroug h July 22 . The Director o f Finance and I have re c eive d previou s authority to a ttend As s oci a tion functions of interest to our Districts. -2- .· ) No. 14 -GENERAL AUTHORIZATION FOR ATTENDANCE OF PERSONNEL AT CONFERE NCES: For the past several years the General Manag er has been annually authorized to desig nate members of the Board and/or staff to attend meet ings, conferences, etc., which he.believes will .be of value to the Dis tricts. The cost of such trips and meetings for the past 12 months has been $261. The p revious authoriz.ation specified that any trips made under this authorization not be of ove rnight duration. We have found this limitation to be quite inconvenient in certain respects. For ins tanc e, some meeting s requiring attendance are held in northern California cities at an early hour in the morning and other meetings requiring overnig ht lod g ing a re called without sufficient advance notice to obtain p rior Bo a rd a uthorization. We therefore recommend adoption of the motion app earing on the agenda allowing the .General Manager more latitude in this respect. District No. 5 No. 25 -ADJOURNMENT TO JUNE 21: The Chairman has suggested that the Board adjourn to 4:30 p.m. on . this date at Newport Beach City Hall . primarily to inform the two new .Directors of the District's current programs. Ex-Chairman Parsons will be invited to attend to assist the staff and engineer in this regard. There will also be several items of regular bus iness to be taken up, including matters connected with construction of the new Coast Highway force main from Rocky Point to the Santa Ana River since the plans and specifications will be ready for advertising for bid. District No. 6 is participating in the cost of this facility, therefore it will be necessary for the District No . 6 Board to meet jointly with the Board of District No. 5 in connection with this construction. District No. 6 No. 28 -ADJOURNMENT TO JUNE 21: We are recomme nding that the Board adjourn to this date at 4:30 p.m. at Newport Beach .City Hall (see Item No. 25). District No. 11 No. 29 -PROPOSAL FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SLATER AVENUE SEWER : One of the District's budgeted expe nditures for capital outlay this year is the construction of a trunk sewer in Sl ate r Avenue from Nichols Street to Newland Street, a dis tanc e of approximately 5,000 feet. Thi.s new facility will connect with the Knott Interceptor, now under con- struction. The timing of the construction of the Slater Av e nue s ew er should be such tha t it can be used as soon as the Knott Interceptor is completed to that point, thus relieving the serious overloading in the Miller-Holder trunk sewer in which District No. 11 is temporarily renting capacity. We recommend that the General Manager be authorized to ask the District's engineer, Keith and Associates, to submit a proposal fo r the .design services for this facility; the total project cost is estimated to be $355,000. -3- f District No. 1 No. 34 -ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SIPHON IN GREENVILLE TRUNK AT WARNER 1 AVENUE: Approximately 10 years ago , a siphon was constructed in this trunk sewer to accommodate a n ew storm drain in War ner Ave nue. During the past few years as flows have bui lt up in this trlU1k it has been observed that the exis tin g siphon doe s not have as much capacity as that of the sewer upstream. 'r hi s condition causes lU1desirable mainten- ance problems at t he p r esent .time a nd in the near future will be a bottleneck limiting the c apacity o f the sewer .to mu ch below its design figure. According l y , I have a s ke d the District's engin e er to submit a proposal for eng inee r i n g services in connection with r e placing the siphon with one o f l a r ge r cap a city. A copy of this proposal, which also describ es t h e p r oblem i n more detail, is included with the agenda material and we rec ormnend i ts a cceptance in order that the construction work can be a ccomp lishe d dur ing the dry season this year. District No. 7 No. 38 -RE QUES T FOR ANNEXATIO N OF TRACT 6232: Included with the agenda material is a re quest from the Klug Deve lopment Company, Inc., for an a nnexat ion of approximate l y 22 .25 ac r es f ronting on Meads Avenue between Santiago Canyon Road and Randall St reet i n t he Orange Park Ac r es area . We rec omme nd that the re q ue st be referred to the staff f or r eport with possible action initi at ing annexation p roceedings ~t the next regular meeting.· No. 39 -REPORT ON ROUTING OF ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER : The Board members will recall that in February the City of Or ang e requested that the Board consider establishing an alig nment of this facility which would deviate from the Dis trict's 19 69 Maste r Pl an alig nment . This facility is s h own in the Master Plan Report as the u p per r e aches of the Tustin-Orang e Trunk. It is n e cessary that the Bo a rd appro v e the realig nment befor e t he sewer can be constructe d by the Cit y of Orange, with reimbur sement by the Dist rict. · In the interval since the City's request. was r eceived, our s t aff and the Distr.ict ·' s ·eng inee r h a ve had numerous meeting s with the staff of the City of Orang e to wo r k out an. alignment satisfactory to all concerned. By the time of the Board meeting it is expe cted that a definite a lignment can be recomme nded for possible adoption b y the Bo a r d . Nos. 40 throug h 43 -COMPLETION OF CONTRACT NO . 7-6-4: This c ontract , for the constr uc t ion of the Red Hi ll Interceptor, Re aches 6, 7 and 8, was satisfactorily completed by the contractor on Ma y 31. The facility construct ed is the most northern portion of the const ructi on work authorized and f inanc e d by the 1970 bond issue. The last segme nt of this work to be completed is Con tra ct No . 7-6-3, which is i n the fi n a l stages o f constructi on. Its completion wi ll a f f ord p e rma nent r e lief to the exi sting overloaded Red Hi ll and Gisler system . In orde r to clos e out Contr a ct No . 7-6-4, we recommend the adoption of thr e e c hange orders (Items Nos. 40 , 41 and 42), copies of whic h ar e inc l uded in the agenda material and whi ch are s e l f -exp l a natory. I t e m No . 4 3 is the customary resolution acceptin g the contract as complete on May 31 and authorizing fi l ing of a No tice of Completion. -4- l No. 44 -ENGINEERING SERVICE FOR JAMBOREE ROAD SUBTRUNK NO. 1: The Board members wi ll recall that the construction of this facility by the Irvine Industrial Complex has been approyed on a master plan reimbursable bas is. In accorda._nce with the customary procedures for this type of project, the District's engin~er will prepare plans and specifications for construction by the Irvine Industrial Complex. Accprding ly, we have asked Boyle Eng ineering to submit a proposal for these services, a copy of which is included .in the agenda material. We reconnnend its acceptance. No. 45 -RECEIVE AND FILE AND REJECT CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: This small claim ($42.47 ) h a s b een filed with the District for a:lleged damage to . an automobile during t he c onstruc tion of Contract No. 7-6-3.. If there is liability i nvolv e d , it b elongs with the contractor and we understand he has taken s teps to sett le the matter. However, as a matter of record, the Board should receive and file and reject the claim. District No. 2 No. 49 -REPORT OF SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON ANNEXATION FEES AND CONNECTION CHARGES: S ince the May 24 adjou rned Board meeting, at which the Connnitte e reported on its deliberations to date, the Committee held a further meeting on June 8 which will be reported on at this meeting. No. 50 -DEFERlvlENT OF PAYMENT OF ANNEXATION FEES BY ANAHED1 HILLS, INC., FOR ANNEXATION NO. 6: Although the Special Committee on Annexa- tion Fees and Connection Charges was not charged with the consideration of the request of 'Anaheim Hills, Inc., for deferred· payment of annexa- tion fees, the Committee did review the matter. No conclusion wa s re ach ed concerning whethe r or not the proponent should be permitted to de fe r the annexation fee payment over a five-year period; however, it was the consensus of the Committee members that if the Board does permit the deferment o f payment of annexation fees as requested, that any unp aid deferred balance should be subject to a .6% interest cha r ge . No. 51 -JJ~ITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION NO. 6: At the May 24 adjourned meeting of the Boa rd, the General Counsel was directed to prepare a r esolution initiating annexation proceeding s subject to the following conditions: ( 1) That the annexation fe.es shall be those established following conclusion of the studies of the Spec i a l Com- mitte e (Item No . 49) (2) That the maximum flow acceptable until the District's relief fac ilities are constructed wi ll be ·3 5 0,000 gallons per day to be discharged duririg low flow periods (3) That the City of Anaheim be requested to explore the feasibility of requiring low vo lume plumbing fixtures be installed in the area to be annexed and ·(4) That temporary facilities required to serve the area until permanent faci li- ties can be constructed be installed ·and maintained at no cost to the District. This re~o lution has been prepared and is included in the agenda material. · Nos. 52 and 53 -ENGINEERING PROPOSALS: Also, at the May 24 adjourned meeting, the staff was directed to request a proposal from Lowry and Associates for the following work: (1) Design of Santa Ana Rive r Interceptor from Ka t e lla Avenue to Rive rs ide Freeway _ and the Robert F. Finnell River Crossing and (2) Services for preliminary desi g n studies and routing of the Yorba Linda Pump Station a nd Fo rce Main, Kraemer -5- Interceptor, Palm Drive Interceptor and Carbon Canyon Interceptor. The two prop osals requested are includ ed in the agenda material and are r ecomm ende d for acceptance. The proposal for desig n of the Santa Ana River Int e rceptor specifie s a l ump sum fee of $107,92 0 which the staff believe s to be reasona ble f o r t h e amount of work involved. I t also propos es a maximum fee of $8500 · on a per diem basis for prep a ration of the r equired project repor t. The s econd proposal specifies that the work be done on a per di em basis f or an amount not to exceed $50,000, a good portion of wh i ch will be f or aerial photography mapping . The fee for this wo rk will be c r edited to future design fees for construction of the facil i t i e s under stu dy . No. 54 -PREPAR~TIO N OF EWvIRONME NTAL IMPACT STATEMENT -SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEP TOR , REACH NO. 2 : Concurre ntly with preparation of a project r epor t for t his fa c i lity (Item No . 52 ), the preparation of the requi re d Environmental Imp a c t St a tement and meeting s with inte rested . environment al g roups and a g encies should be und e rtal~en. The staff r ecomme n ds t h at Ri char d Te rry and Associat es of Anaheim be a s ked to submit a ·p r oposal f or t h e pr e p a r at ion of this Statement . The Di~ectors will r ec a ll that t h i s firm wa s eng a g ed by the Joint Dist ricts in conne ction wi th the 1971-72 Plant P r oj ec~s and was als o rec ently ret ained i n con n e ction wi th tbe 1 9 72-73 Plant Projects. We have found that t hi s f i rm 's work is very sat isfactory . In add ition, it has had r ec e nt e x p e rie nce in preparation of an Environmenta l Impact Statement for the County for Santa Ana River Ca nyon ·pro j ects •. No. 57 -ADJO URNlvIBNT TO JUNE 29: The Special Comm ittee on Annexation Fees and Co n n e ction Ch a r g es (Item No . 49 ) wi l l recomm end tha t the Boar d ad j ourn to t he a b ove d a te a t 5:30 p .m. for furthe r cons ideration of such fees and cha r g es . -6- Fred A. Harper General Manager Item No. 5 Call meeting of the Executive Committee for 5:30 p.m., Tuesday, June 27th. Invite Directors Stevens and Store. Or Directors Scott and Duke. Report on meeting with Assemblyman Burke and State Senator Carpenter re: State construction grant program. Item No. 9-h Appointment of special committee of Directors to review with management the compensation of pistricts' Department Heads: Directors Nevil, Root, Stephenson, Winn and Duke. ORIENTATION FOR NEW DIRECTORS 6-1-72 ~Robert Root, Mayor, City of Fullerton ~ 'Louis Reinhardt, Councilman, City of Fullerton ... \William Ph-ill-i-ps, Member, Board of Supervisors ) -Kar Hil~Gilman., City 0f L@8= Al.ami-tos \. K. Holden, Mayor, City of Seal Beach ~Frank Sales, Councilman, City of Seal Beach ~\charles Stevens, Jr., Councilman, City of La Habra ~alph Clark, Member, Board of Supervisors \-'?-Norman ··Culver, Member, Garden Grove Sanitary ~Robert Ne~il, Councilman, City of La Habra District v!f. J. Nuijens, Councilman, City of 8x Stanton .~or Vanderwaal, Councilman, City of La Palma ~esse M. Davis, Councilman, City of Buena Park .>Alici ta Lewis, Mayor, City of Stanton ~dward Just, Councilman, City of Fountain Valley ~Rudy Castro, Mayor, City of Yorba Linda ~t-t-o-Lacayo, Mayor, City of Cypress ~b~f" <),,v<- Al ·c.... r.::~Ax t°ll..)-,_ C)~.1 })r~L 1( MEET H lG DATE June 1 4, 1 9 7 2 TIME 7 :30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1 ,2 ,3 .5 .6 ,7 & 11 DISTRICT 1 ACTI VE DIRECTORS (H ERR IN) •..••• ~-Er ...•.. ./ (CAS PER S) .••.. BATTIN ...•.• ---V----- ( rlELSH) • • • • · · • MILLER •.•.•• ~ == == PORTER. • • • • • / ___ _ D' -RICT 2 (~REZ) · • · • • • SMITH • • • • • • ~ ----CULVER .•••• --___ _ ~LANGER) ••.••. FI NNE LL ••.. _y'__ ---- KOWALSKI) •••. FOX ••.••••• + ___ _ GR I SET) ••.••. HERRIN ..••. _____ _ (HOLLINDEN) •.• JU S T . ~ ..••• + ___ _ (ROBERTS).···· NEVIL ....•. ~--· __ (CASPERS).···· PHILLI PS .•• ~·--__ (REIN HARDT) .•• FltQOf-.•..... -y-___ _ ~DUTTONl •••... STE PHE NSON • -r ___ _ CASTRO .•..•. WED AA .•••.• ~.k--__ POTTER •...•. WINN. •••.•.• ~tu ___ _ DISTRICT 3 CUL VER ·.··· _L ---- (CASPERS).···· BATTI N····· ~ ---- (HINES).······ DAVIS •••••. + ___ _ (KOWAl-SKI ) · · • FOX···· .••• _· ____ _ (COEN). · · • • • · • GREEN ••.•.• _.; ____ _ (FRANKIEWIC H~ LACAYO····· ~lJ:t. -- !NUIJENS) • • .. LE WIS .. ·... __ MILLER}····· LONG······· _.I ____ _ GRISET} ••••. HERRIN····· _l(_ ___ _ BARNES} · · • • • HOLDEN · .• · . _L_ ___ _ ·· MC \'IHINNEY . ./ -v----- !REINHARDT<· .. li<l~T · • · "i-b£-:----- HOLL I NDEN} · · SCOTT ••.. · .• v Do/ DUTTON) · · • · · STEPHEN S ON . ~ ---- ROBERTS) · • · · ST EVE NS· · · · ~ ---- BYRNE)······ VANDERWAAL . --;;r-==== ==== DISTRICT 5 JO I NT BO ARDS ACTIVE DIRECTORS.~Cv CH OLLI NDEN) ••• JUST • .-•••••• ;:/ ,__ (CA SP ERS) •.•.• BAKER ••.•••• iJ:· ~ (CASPERS) ••••• BATTIN •••••• __ ~ · ... @ASPERS &f~l"f?.SdL_/ ~ (CASPERS) ••• ··CLAR K·······~ /..--""' CULVER· • •·• • • -:?" ~ (HINES) •••• •• ·DAVIS ······· s;:< ~ (COEN)········DUK E········ ~ (LANGER) •• · ···FI NN ELL· •• ··~~ (KOWAl-SKI .) •••.• FOX·........ 17 _:.....i.:::::: (COEN) ••• ~.~ ~S. • • • • • • 17 ~ (COEN) •••• ••• ·GREEN·······~ ~ !H@Rf'.(00 • • • • • ·6'RISET· • • • • • -=--- GR I SET).···· ·HE RRIN· •••• ·~~ BARNES) ••• ···HOLDEN· ••••• ~~ MC IN NIS) •••• KY MLA······· ~ ~ GF>iui m Krey ftw.) ·~· . . . . . ~ __ (NUIJENS • ····LEWI S ·······~ .-- (MILLER)· • • • • ·LONG· • • • • • • • ___.L_ ~ (CROUL) ·······MC INN IS ···· ~ ~ MC WHIN NEY· • -7' ,___. (WELSH)··· ····MI LLER· • • • • • __ ~ (ROBERTS)···· ·NEVIL······· ~ ~ (CASPERS)· ····PHILLIPS···· ;:::::?' ~ P OR TER ······~~ ~FISCHBACH ) ••• QUIG LE Y .•••• ~ ~ MC Hl~ll S) ••• ·ROGERS. • • • • • - & 1"' 1..:1 II«-'iYI R:ii0T . . . . . . . . ~ L--- (HO LL I ND EN) .•• scoT T ·······~ ~ (PEREZ) ·······S MI T H ·······~~ (DUTTON)······ STEP HENSON·· ~ ~ (ROB.ERTS) • • • • ·ST EVENS ·· • · • ~ ~ (MC I NN I S)··· ·STORE ······· v""' ~ (BYRNE) · · • • • • • VANDERWAAL • • _iL_ i-- (CASTRO)······ WEDAA • · • · • • • ~ )...,/' (POTTER)····· ·WINN········ _iL_ '- * * * * * (CROLJL) • • ·····MC INN I$.··· R. ·5-----,, ~I e) • • • • • • CA-Sff'R'S f)\-,tf«.s o --"7 ---- · GOLDBERG···· ---- MITCHELL···· --.;.,,____ (M C INNIS) ... KYM LA •••••. ------OTHERS DISTRI CT 6 · PORTER· • ·a · ./ __ -- ( P~-h:L I PS ) • • • GA&P ERS .--: fl-,~-;q-___ _ (MC INNIS)··· STORE······ ~ ---- DISTRICT 7 ~~~~~~~~):::: ~[~~~~::::: ~ === === (HERRIN).···· ~. • • · ·--;r----- . PORTER •...•• ~~ -.- ( r-• scHBAC~) •. QUIG LE Y ..... -1Lli. ---- ( INNIS1· ~ R@8Erz"S" •.•.•. + ---- (PEREZ).····· SM ITH .•..••• --· ---- DIST RICT 11 (~COE !~) · · .~. ~ · · · · · · ~ ----. - CASP[:RS) ...• BA KER ••.•.•• --V----- CO EN)· ...... DU KE .••••.• -·----- DISTRICT 8 GOLD BERG . · · ------ (CLARK )······ CA SPERS · • · • ------ MITC HELL · · • ----- 5 /1 0/72 HARPER BROWN SYLVESTE R LE WIS DU NN CLAR KE SIGLER NISSON TA YLO R BROHN BOETTNER CARL SO N FI NSTER GALLO\~AY HOH ENER H O\r~AR D .HUNT KE ITH LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON MU RONEY PIER SA LL STE VENS K V 1 tJ <::>t MEETI NG DAT E June 14 , 1 972 TIME 7:30 p .m. DISTRICTS 1,2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ,7 & 11 · DI STR 1 CT 1 ACTIVE DIRECTORS ? H_ERRI N) •••.•. GR I SET ••.••. \ ------CAS PE RS.1. -..• BATTIN .••..• (WELSH) ••••.•• MILLER •. ····============ PORTER ••••.• _____ _ (P EREZ)· ·····SMITH ...... --· ---- CULVER ..••• __ . --__ !LA NGER) •••••. FINNELL •.•• ------ KO \'J ALS [<I) .... FOX ........ _____ ._ GRISET) •••••. HERRIN .•••. _____ _ HOLLI NDE N) •.• JUST . ~ ••••• _____ _ ROBERTS).···. NEVIL ..•••• ----· -- {CASPERS).··.·. PHILLIPS ... _____ _ (RE IN HARDT) ••. ROOT ....... _____ _ ~DUTTONl •••••. STEPHE NSO N . _____ _ CASTRO •.•.•. WEDAA ..••.. _____ _ POTTER •.••.• WINti ••••... __ -. __ _ DISTRICT 3 CULVER····· ------ (CASPERS). • • • · BATTIN · · . · • ------ !HI NES) ... · .. · DAVIS ...... _____ _ KO WA SKI ) • · · FOX·······. __ ----COEN~ • • · • • • • GREEN •• ·~·~· · ?-__ FRANKIE W ICH~ LACAYO·. ii t__I __ . __ ~NUIJENS) .. • · LE WIS ...... _____ _ MILLER}····· LONG······· _____ _ GRISET( • .... HERRIN .. · .. _____ _ BARNES r • · • • · HOLDEN····· _____ _ MC WHINNEY. _____ _ !REINHARDT) •.• ROOT··· 'l"J.lh' ~ __ HOLLINDEN) · · SCOTT·· . .VPU. ~ ___ _ DUTTON )····· STEPHENSON. ROBERTS)···· STE VENS····============ BYRNE)······ VA NDERWAAL. _____ _ DISTRICT 5 (CROUL) • • , · • • MC INNIS • · · (BAKER)· · · • · · CASPERS . • · · (M (\.INNIS)··· KY MLA······ DISTRICT 6 PORTER· · • .. (PHILLIPS)··· CASPERS···· (Mc INN Is) ••. STORE· ..•.. DISTRICT 7 (WELSH)······ (CASPERS)··· · (HERRIN).···· ( •. SCH B AC~) · · ( I NNI S) .•. (PEREZ)· · · · · · DIST RICT 11 MILLER····· ------ CLARK· · · • · • ------ GR I SET .••.. ·------. P.ORTER ....•. ------ QUIGLEY ..... ----- ROGERS •••... ------ SM ITH ....... __ --- (COE N) · .. • · · GI BB S · · • · · · ----- (CA S Pf:RS) .•.. BA KER ••...•• ------ (COEN )··· •.•. DU KE ....... ------ DISTRICT 8 , GOLD BERG · · · ------ (C LARK )······ CAS PERS · • • · ----- MI TCHELL··· ----·- 5/10/72 JOINT BOARD S ACTI T/E DIRECT ORS . CHOLLI NDEN) •.• JUST ••••.••• ,/ v (CASPERS) ••... BAKER .•...•• -, ---;:- (CASPERS) •.••• BATTIN .•.••• ~~ -r---CASPERS..... / (CASPERS)· · ···CLARK· • • • • • • -./--y CULVER· • • • • • -.;-·-Y ( HIN ES) • • • • • • ·DAV IS· • • • • • • -./-~ (COEN)····· ···DUKE········ / ./ (LANGER)······ FINNELL· .••• _v _ ~ ( KOWAt-SKI) • · • ·FOX· · • · • . • • • _v-__ _ (COEN)······ • • Gl"B-BS • • ... • • • _.£..__ ~ (COEN)··· • • • • ·GREEN····· • • _./_ ~ !HERRIN;· ·····GRIScT······ _/_ --:;. GRISET ······HERRIN·.····_./_ -- BARNES ······HOLDEN······ __L_ ~ MC INNIS) •. ··KYMLA·· ••••• __:!..._ ~ (F.RANKIEWICH) ·LACAYO ••.••• ___£;__ __ 4 ~NUIJENS) •••.• LEWIS······· ___:!_ ____::::::: MILLER)~· · • ··LOMG· • · • · • • • + _L CROUL). ······MC INN IS···· __ _L · MC WH I NNEY • • _:!__ :___::!._' (WELSH) •• ·····MILLER······__:!..._~ (ROBERTS)···· ·NEVIL······-. ·j ~ (CASPERS)·····PHILLIPS···· ----· PORTER· • • • • • _./_ --~ (FISCHBACH) •.• QUIGLEY ..••• _I _ ___:!__ (fiC INNIS) •.•. ROGERS...... ~ r l e"1:--Vi lihn ..L ROO'f°'. • • • . • • • ./ V ( ) . ~ ./ HOLLINDEN ··.SCOTT·.· .• •• ---- (PEREZ) ..••••• SMITH·······__:!_______:::_ (DUTTON) • · • · • ·STEPHENSON •• _v ___ w_ (ROBERTS) • • •.• STEVENS ..••• -""-__ ..,-_ (MC INNIS) ••• ·STORE·······~ _v'_ (BYRNE)······ ·VANDERWAAL· • _.:L. ~ (CASTRO) • • • • · · WEDAA • • · · • • • _.!"_ --"'- (POTTER)····· ·WINN········ ~ _..;_ OTHERS * * * * * GOLDBERG· • · • ---- MITCHELL···· ---- HARPER BROWN SYLVESTER LEWIS DUNN CLARKE SIGLER NISSON TAYLOR w~~ BOETTNER CARLSO N FINSTER GALLOWAY HO H EN ER HO \-'~ARD HUNT KEITH LYNCH MADDOX ~ MARTINSON . CI' MURO NEY 'oe\ \~u\~~ ~ ~i~~~~~L -- 1-:)~~ ~ ~ ~ P.ite>-\ ·-• .- Do"' Se,t-v ~'·""' fo ~o r 1 S -1i. RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS June 14, 1972 -7:30 p.m. WARRANT NO. 18055 -'"lo56 ~057 18058 18059 18060 18061 18062 18063 18064 18Q65 18066 18067 18068 18069 18070 18071 18072 18073 18074 18075 18076 18077 18078 18079 18080 18081 18082 18083 18084 18085 18086 18087 18088 18089 18G90 18091 18092 18093 1809L~ 18095 18096 18097 18098 18099 18100 18101 18102 18103 18104 , ~1oi::; .,I ~106 18107 18108 18109 18110 18111 18112 18113 18114 18115 18116 JOINT OPERATING FtrnD WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF ACE Automotive Equipment Co., Tools $ American Lock & Supply Inc., Hardware .American Standa;rd Heat 'fransfer Di vision, Pump Parts American Standard Industrial Products, Pump Parts Ameron, Adhesives City of Anaheim, Power ~ Water Anaheim Dodge, Truck Parts The .Anchor Paclcing Co., Pump Packing Azusa Western, Cement Baker Equipment Rentals, Equipment Rental Bank of America, Bond & Coupon Collection Bearing Specialty Coo, Compressor Parts & Bearings Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair James G. Biddle Co., Technical Manual Blower Paper Co.,. Masl\ing Tape Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams City of Buena Park, Lateral Repai1., Business Publishers, Inc., Technical Journal C & R Reconditioning Coo, Shaft Repair Cadillac Plastic & Chemical Co., Fiberglass California Wholesale Electric Co., Electrical Supplies Cameo House Photography, Publication Material Leonard Carney, CWPCA Conference Exp~nse College Lumber Company, Inc., Building Materials Consolidated Electrical Distro, Electrical Supplies Constructors Supply Co., Chain Hoist-,Drill Paul Ao Cooper, Grit Removal Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inco, Truck Parts County Sanitation District Noo 2 of L.A. County, Oil Disposal dharge Coxwells, Inc., Air System Supplies Crown Controls, Inco, Cable Crystaliner Corpo, Paint Supplies John Mo Deck, Equipment Parts DeGuelle & Son's Glass Coo, Truck Repairs Diamond Core Drilling, Core Drilling Division of Highways, Westside Repair Inspection Dow Chemical UoS.A", Test Materials {MO 3-8-72) Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Ecomatics, Chlorinator Electric Supplies Distributing, Electrical Supplies Enchanter, Inco, Ocean Research & Monitoring Engine Process Compressor Div., Compressor Parts Enterprise Printing Coo, Plans & Specifications Essick Machinery Company, Compressor Parts Lorren Go Etienne, Employee Mileage FMC Corpo, Shaker Parts Fiberglass Specialties, Panels Fibre Glass Evercoat Coo, Resin Fischer & Porter Coo, Power Supplies & Controls Fisher Controls Company, Regulator Parts Fletcher Jones Chevrolet, Engine Repair Fowler Equipment, Inc., Equipment Rental William Ho Fox, Employee Mileage Freedom Newspapers, Inco, Bid Notices . City of Fullerton, Water Gaines Electric Supply Co., Electrical Supplies Garden Grove Lumber & Cement Coo, Building Supplies General Electr·ic Supply Co., Elect1~ical Supplies General Telephone Company . WoWo Grainger, Inc., Electrical Supplies Graybar Electric Co., Electrical Supplies Hach Chemical Company, Inc., Sampler A-1 AMOUNT 45.47 28064 118092 1,735081 44'"{ .22 73.47 38.95 103.19 246.23 47.36 23.24 630.90 14.oo 13.91 134.74 50.00 327061 24000 100.0) 203.50 114.24 35.28 82.20 569. 44 2,216.47 620.22 1, 2'72 0 00 593044 78.84 235.79 56.10 18.01 18090 18038 338010 600.82 2,501.94 479.14 l,249.5C) 4L,81 2,055000 1,021.81 58.75 . 1C)6. 79 7.65 821073 l,597.D5 86016 1,248023 41 o4·) 329015 182075 24090 17050 5.35 395064 133.35 866.79 1,711080 43.84 67083 23.10 WARRANT N0. 18117 18118 18119 -'")120 ~121 18122 18123 18124 18125 18126 18127 18128 18129 18130 18131 18132 18133 18134 18135 18136 18137 18138 18139 18140 18141 18142 18143 18J.44 18145 18ll..!6 18147 18148 18149 18150 18151 18152 18153 18154 181~~ .J..,, 18156 18157 18158 18159 18160 18161 18162 18163 18164 18165 18166 18167 18168 18169 "'~170 ~171 18172 18173 18174 28175 18176 18177 18178 18179 18180 18181 IN FAVOR OF Harman Pump Company, Pump Parts $ Fred A. Harper, Various Mteso & COD Expense Hill Brothers Chemical Co., Solvents Honeywell, Inc., Strip Charts Howard Supply Company, Piping Supplies City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Beach Framing, Frames Industrial Water Condittoning, Water Service International Business Machines Corpo, Mtce. Agrmt. Internatj_onal Harvester Co., Truck Parts Kahl Scientific Instrument Corp., Research Supplies Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies King Bearing, Inc., Bearings Kleen Line Corpo, Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware Kressilk Products, Inc., Screening LBWS, Inc., Weldh1g Supplies, Tools & Hardware '11he La cal Company, Inc., Seals & Bushings Judy Lee, Employee Mileage Lewis Broso Battery, Batteries Majestic Fasteners Company, Hardware Mesa Supply, Truck Parts Nate's Saw & Lawnmower Shop, Inco, Saw Sharpening National Chemsearch Corpo, Cleaners National Concrete Sawing, IncoJ Core Drilling Neely & Walker, Inc., Equipment Parts City of Newport Beach, Water Co Arthur Nisson, General Counsel Retainer Occidental College, Ecology Trawl Ocean Engineering Information Service, Technical Journal Kelly Olguin, Employee Mileage Orange County Boiler & Ind. Repair, Boiler Repairs Orange County Fire Protection, Fj.re Extinguishers Orange County Radiotelephone Orange County Hater Worlrn, Water Pacific Pumping Co., Pump Parts Pacific Telephone John J. Phillips, Employee Mileage Postmaster Lee Potter Company, Inc., Mtce. Supplies Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal Repco Service & Retubing Co., Rebuild Oil Heat Exchanger Rex Chainbelt, Inc., Bar Screen Parts Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Santa Ana Book Store, Inco, Technical Manuals Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Rewind Santa Ana Electronics Co., Electronic Supplies Sargent Welch Scientific Coo, Lab Supplies Schiele Moving & Storage Coo, Moving Expense Scientific Glass Apparatus, Tubing City of Seal Beach, Water Security Industrial Supply Co., Pipe Supplies s. Fo Serrantino, Employee Mileage Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies A. H. Sh:lpkey, Ince, Truck Tires John Sigler, Employee Mileage South Orange Supply, Hardware & Piping Southern Califu Edison Coo Southern Calif. Gas Co. Southern Calif. ''later Coo Southwest Processors, Oil Removal Sparkletts Drinl{ing Water Corp., Bottled Water Speed-E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Oil Company, Gasoline & 011 A-2 AMOlrnT 8.37 168016 ,._ c::.1 blo_,, 247.02 504080 7o06 10.40 40.00 515086 98.57 84.57 1,873.60 135.76 127.17 276. 39 47025 854.74 156.98 25074 231.58 213.06 89046 10.05 228.11 160.00 22065 9.00 700.0J 325.00 32.00 7.05 389. I+o 90.83 49.46 16.80 633.15 380.20 107.04 500.0:) 143.11 41046 150.00 496070 373.61 145. 7'7 . 63.00 213020 92082 43095 178.75 10.81 34.22 2,012064 27042 773.93 167.00 11.25 251.55 23,457.52 1,189.58 3.39 330.00 56061 563.96 l,754022 WARRANT NO. 18182 18183 18184 -~185 ~186 18187 18188 18189 18190 18191 18192 18193 18194 18195 18196 18197 18198 18199 18200 18201 18202 18203 1820L~ 18205 18206 18207 18208 18209 18210 18211 18212 18213 18211-t 18215 18216 28217 18218 18219 18220 18221 18222 18223 18224 18225 iq226 ~227 18228 18229 18230 18231 18232 18233 IN FAVOR OF John W. Stang Corp., Pump Parts $ Starow Steel, Steel Stock Surveyors Service Co., Survey Supplies T & H Equipment Co., Inco, Tractor Parts Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage Technical Book Company, Manual 39 Stake & Building Supplies, Hardware c.o. Thompson Petroleum.Co., Kerosene Tony's Lock & Safe Service, Keys Trans World Airlines, Inc., Freight Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Steel J.G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Blower & Operating Supplies Tustin Water Works, Water Harry Twining, Employee Mileage Union Oil Company, Gasoline Union Sign Company, Signs United States Helium, Lab Supplies United Technology Center, Freight Valve & Primer Corp., Valves Vaniman Camera, Photo Supplies & Service Wall Colmonoy Corp., Electrical Supplies John R. Waples R.s., Odor Consultant Warren & Bailey Company, Inc., Gauges Water & Sem.1.ge Works, Tech Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, Training Manuals WBukesha Engine Ser·vicenter, In.co, Engine Parts Robert A. WebberJ Employee Mileage Western Carloading Company, Freight Western Salt Company, Salt Whitney's Speedometer Service, Repair Speedometer Wilson Engine &·: Equlpment Co., Engine Parts Russ Wold, Employee Mileage World Travel Bureau, Inco, Meeting Travel Expenses Worthington Service Corp&, Pump Parts Xerox Corp., Reproduction Service TOTAL JOINT OPERATING CAPI'I'AL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRAN'l'S IN FAVOR OF Bruning Division, Plan Racks · ' John Carollo En£;ineers, Bngineering -Plant Constr. Carollo & Keith, Survey I-8 County of Orange, Compaction Test I-8 Daily Pilot, Bid Notice P2-20 E.T.I. & Kordiak, Contractor P2-ll-1 Harron, Rickard & McCone Co., Equipment Rental Jo Putnam Henck, Contractor P2-17 JiE. Hoagland & W.W. Hoa[Sland, Contractor P2-19 Kordick & Rados, Contractor I-8 LBWS, Inc., Machine Equipment B.H. Miller Construction Co., Contr~ J-7-2/J-12 Osborne Laboratcries, Inc., Pipe Testing I-8 Healy Tibbitts Construction Co., Contractor I-7-3 Twining Laboratories, Testing P2-11-l, I-8, J-12 B.E. Wallace Products Corp., Gantry Crane F.T. Ziebarth Company, Inc., Contractor Pl-3-1, Pl-1R-l/P2-1'R-l TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF .A:...3 $ $ $ $ AMOUNT 75.60 593.48 13097 149.08 16.88 8.41 12013 124.22 21074 20.75 23.10 268.85 138.81 28014 17.20 li2. 21 77018 62001 220.52 21~ 0 39 339028 2l'l .60 285001 7 .50 96.91 2,061001 24.18 34.72 37.28 13080 628.60 33018 135000 796095 84:1.00 75,909.30 551025 12,948.31 5,015000 503.66 48098 44,208000 225.75 ll,645)+o 13,830.00 994,124.90 625.38 26,411072 1,25J.00 15,368.35 143030 1, 109. 36 30,774058 l,158~783.94 1,234,693024 DISTRICT NO. 2 WARRANT NO. OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 1,250.00 18234 18235 18236 18237 Lowry & Associates, Engineering Service, Annexation Fees $ DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engr. Serv., Survey & Design 3-17-1 & 3-18 $ 10' 267. 50 , DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Survey 3-17 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF City of Newport Beach, Connection Administration -B- $ 584.oo $ 1,772.00 WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 1P 0 38 1.....,39 18240 18241 18242 18243 18244 18245 18245-A 18246 18247 18248 18249 Boyle Engineering, Engr., Plan Check & Inspection C. Arthur Nissan & Jack J. Rimel, Legal Serv. A.D.#9 Orange City News, Legal Notice, A.D.#9 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL ourLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engr. Serv., Survey & Design CONSTRUCTION FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Survey 7-6-3 Colich Construction Co., Contractor 7-6-3 County of Orange, Compaction Tests 7-6-4 Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Pipe Testin~ 7-6-3, Northern Contracting Co., Contractor 7--4 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 7-5-lR 7-6-4 Boyle Engineering, Survey 7-2C-l, 7-2D-4 & 7-2D-5 DISTRICTS NOS. 1 & 7 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Survey-As Built, 7-6-1 & 7-6-2 Mike Masanovich Construction Co., Inc., Contr. 1-12 Sully Miller Contracting Co., Contractor 7-6-1 -C- $ AMOUNT -140.25 1,880.63 68.56 $ 2,089.44 $ 4,980.00 $ 546.oo 56,425.00 150.48 150.00 26,002.06 $ 83,273.54 $ 1,578.00 $ 91,920.98 $ 3,127.50 47,495.66 163,924.16 $ 214,547.32 JI":_· .. .:~.. ' •. /j) ,· ·l/ fl_ {!), ~· ~.r7/4J .. J#I ~. _, ~!.,;i..~ I ENGINEERING 0 ENGINEERS• ARCHITECTS 412 SOUTH LYON STREET SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92.702 TELEPHONE t714l 547-4471 May 11, 1972 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos • 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and l l of Orange County, California P. 0 . Box 81 27 Fountain Valley, California 92708 ADDRESS REPLY TO P.O. BOX 178 Participation by Districts Nos. 3 and 11 in Cost of a Portion of the lnterplant Influent Interceptor Sewer (Job No. 1-8) The Master Plans of faci Ii ties for both DistTicts NoS. 3 and 11, prior to the decision of the Districts to construct the lnterplont Influent Interceptor, incllJded a jointly- owned 96-inch trunk sewer (Knott lntercepf·or) either to Plant No. l or Plant No. 2, depending on capacity considerations af· each plant to handle the flow generated in the service area. After the decision was made to construct th_e lnterplant Influent Interceptor, it was necessary for Districts Nos. 3 and 11 to construct trunk sewe:r foci Ii ti es only to the intersection of Brookhurst Street and F.llis Avenue thus eliminating the necessity of carrying the Knott Interceptor into either plant. Accordingly, your staff is recommending that the two districts participate in the cost of the lnterplant Influent ·interceptor to the extent of the cosi of a 96-inch trunk sewer from ~rookhurst Street and Ellis Avenue to Piont No. 1, in addition to their regular share of the cost of this Joint Di~tricts' facility. The attached sketch is intended_ to help yisualize this concept. In order to determine 1·he amount of participation of Districts Nos. 3 and 11, the staff has asked our three firms for a joint estimate of the cost of construction of a 96-inch trunk sewer from Brookhurst Street and Ellis Avenue to Plant No. 1 in order that a reimbu1-sement agreement may be drawn up.-It is our considered and joint opinion that this construction cost would approximate $1 ,300,000. In arriving at PROFESSIONAL ENC.If.JEERING A N D /tRCHITECTURAL SERV CE~ Agenda Item #9(f) D-1 All Districts Page 2 County Sanitation Districts f\Jos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California May 11, 1972 this figure, a review and analysis was made of bids and cost data received for the lnterplant Influent Interceptor and for the Knott Interceptor, Contract No. 3-17, together wif·h independent estimates for the extension of the Knott Interceptor from El I is Avenue and Brookhurst Street to Treatment Pl ant No. 1 • Also, an allowance to cover engineering, inspection, surveying, administration, legal, and incidental costs shou Id be added to the construction cost. We recommend 6 percent of construction cost, which recent experience on projects of this size has shown to be an equitable percentage. Therefore, the total estimated project cost is $1,378,000. We collectively recommend that the $1, 378, 000 figure be approved by the Jo int Boards, County Sanitation District No. 3, and County Sanitation District No. 11. Conrad Hohener, Jr., Boyle Engineering ·Engineer, Cour.ty Sanitation District No. 3 Milo Keith, Keith and Associates Engineer, County Sanitation District No. 11 Attachment. B-C03-106-50 BOYL~ ENGINEE~ING Agenda Item #9(f) D-2 All Districts INTERCEPTOR S'r'STErA COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY -~ t-..: ~ <J) en (/) ,._: ..... 0 '~ <./) U) .-.= c:x: a:: . t-! (/) z I ~~, ::::> <./) <{ _J ::r: 0 _J 0 <{~ -~ 0 ;: 2 I . I 0 _J w t.') (/)' 0 0: (.) z :i <! JJ a:: ~ :::> SLATER AVE. ~ CD co w ,_. . .'--. ---44---' .. ~ 1 u ~ "TALBERT AVE. :il~~L ~ --------io----~,---··1 :i~KNOTT II:: I I li INTERCEPTO~ D;~ :."· • ' ~i CONTRACT m. 3-17<.Qo ::---.:: :.: _E_L_u_s_A_v_E. __ ---+------.l·H'~ ~1.. ~ , ,~ ·, I I j-;Af "'.l-~-~--'9~t't-~4y _GA_R_F_IE_LD __ AV_E_. -..--~j'f JI : ~ ~WI ~ Gi fl~ i w . CJ) I a: 11g ; ~ . TREATMENT ~ ·1 ~I''~ I ~ PLANT NO. 2 YORKTOWN AVE. Z w iH ! Z a> ----------:J-j cf)· : "! • I a: I~ .1 t-. ._ Y.: b = ~ . ..... I . ..;,It <t i z a:• ·~-,I~ -I WO Loi I J I! I, -::> ADAMS AVE. 0 i 0: I;; -I LL....J z --------+---_J·-l J-.1·~ ~ ! <! ']~ ~ ! z ~--------- •l :Jl~ ~ It--., INDIANAPOLIS AVE. tJ_Jjf'I . ~ ]1~ ~ : 5 ,: -------"---_ ' <.! I-.:-_J a.. . ~ I ~ Id <{ . i ffi -.·. 'I ;·~ ) I f-<'( ~1', ~il~_.. ! z ~ _A_TL_A_N_T_A_AV_E_. ----~-/---~ 1r;n. ~)~!«! . . · w : u:J ii ~ I · .. (ii.ii I . !l VICTORIA ST. HAMILTON AVE. ---~--· _:,J_'~-! :-L/ I !J I .·· LEGEND MAY 1972 i H i . t I Jj I :: ::...~...1 1968 ~~ASTER PLAN ~' 1.~ 't' ~:· _,_..__ ~ KNOTT INTE~CEPTCR Bt~NN_LN~~-;_ ·--·~':'{~ ... A • : ALIGNMENT -------·· f ,. .,.· ... (1~~' ~ · .. . ~' ;..,, l 1 f,..y I TRE.l\TMENT. >·~-~~ PLANT NO. I----~ · ~ . oc· . f:'A . . . "' '11 KNOTT INTEHCEPTO~ CONNECTS TO INTE2PL~· INFLUENT INTERCEPTC~ AT ELLIS AVENUE /\J'JD BROOKHURST STREET BOYLE . ENGINEERING ------------------··-· ---·-. -· ···-··-'--- Agenda Item #9(f) D-3 All Districts RESOLUTION N0.·72-83 . AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT TO JOINT POWERS AGREE1-1ENT CREATING AN AGENCY TO BE KNOWN AS THE SOUTHERI\: CALIJ:l'O.Ki~IA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT AUTttORITY. A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT.S NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING DISTRICT NO. 1 TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF LOS ANGELES, AND VENTURA COUNTY CREATING AN AGENCY TO BE KNOWN AS THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT AUTHORITY * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Amendment to Joint Powers Agreement Crea.ting an Agency to be known as the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority, dated , is --------- hereby approved and accepted; and, .. Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1, acting as agent for itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, is hereby authorized and directed to execute said amendment. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting on June 14, 1972. Agenda Item #9(g) -E-All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 72-84 AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT TO FARM LEASE WITH MARSHBURN BRGrHERS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. ·1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT TO FAffi4 LEASE WITH MARSHBURN BROTHERS AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SAID AMENDMENT * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5~ ·6, 7 ~ and 11, of Orange County, Califorriia, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain Amendment No. 1 to the fann lease dated July 1, 1969 with Marshburn Brothers for lease of land. at Treatment Plant No. 1, to extend· said leas.e for a period of one year from July 1, 1972 to June 30, 1973, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1, acting as agent for itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, be authorized and directed to execute said amendment. PASSED AND ADOPI'ED at a regular meeting on June 14, 1972. Agenda Item #9(k) -F-All Districts EXCERPT FROM RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR MEETINGS 8. CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION - A Chairman and Vice Chairm~n of the Joint Administra- tive Organization shall be elected by a majority vote of the Districts at the regular meeting in July of each year. The Chairman and Vice Chairman shall serve at the pleasure of the majority of the Districts. The nominations for Joint Chairman shall be made at the regular Board meeting in June each year, and the nominees may prepare a statement of not more than 100 words stating their qualifications for the office of Chairman. These statements shall be mailed to the members of the Joint Boards of Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for the July regular meeting. Agenda Item #11 -G-All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 72-85 DETERMINING PREVAILING WAGE RATES TO BE PAIP BY CONTRACTORS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,.AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING PREVAILENG WAGE RATES WITHIN SAID DISTRICTS TO BE PAID BY CONTRACTORS AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 71-88, ADOPTED JULY 14, 1971 *·* * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the general prevailing wage rate and the general prevailing rate for holiday and overtime work within the territory of the Districts for each of the crafts, classi- fications or type·s of workmen as set forth on SCHEDULES "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this reso~ution as though fully set forth herein, is hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That Resolution No. 71-88, adopted by the Boards of Directors of the. County Sanitation Districts on July. 14, 1971, establishing the general hourly prevailing wage rate and the general prevailing rate for holiday and overtime work, is hereby repealed and rescinded and made of no further effect; and, Section 3. That all other resolutions or motions or portions thereof in conflict herewith, are hereby rescinded. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1972. Agenda Item #12(a) . -H-All Districts COUN"fX SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. SOX 8127 108« ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VAUEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71-4) 540-2910 May 30' 1972 f7l4) 962-2"'1 MEMORANDUM TO: Fred A. Harper Subject: Pt.Lmping Capacity Sunflower Interceptor Interim PlL~ping Station This facility will pun1p the flows from the Sunflower Interceptor until the completion of the Plarit No. 1 diversion and metering structure which is not·yet.under construction due to delays in receiving a Federal Grant of:fer. The facility was constructed with two pumps and space for a third, to be purchased apd installed as the flows required •. The flo~s have now reached a point that this pump should be installed. The estimated cost of this third pump and its installation is $16~500 including the electrical, with delivery being 12 to 14 weeks. The use of this pump will be required for 12 to 18 months de- pending upon completion of the aforementioned diversion structure. As an al terna ti ve to purchasing a ne·w third pmnp, we could install a vertical wet pit 14-inch pump which is in our - surplus yard. The pump is in good condition and should handle approximately 6,ooo gallons per minute (8.6mgd). The cost to install this unit by Districts' forces is estimated to be $5,500; $4,ooo for the electrical and $1_,500 for the pump installation. This .work can be done in 10 to 12 working days. It is further proposed that one existing pwnp be exchanged with a new, larger, 14-inch model 5720 Fairbanks Morse at a cost of $3,500 •. This includes a trade-in of existing pwnp of $2,000 as quoted by the John Stang Company of Orange, California. The total cost to handle the flows from the interceptor will be $9., 000 as opposed to the.cost of an·entire new unit· of $16,500. This represents a saving of $7,500 to the Districts. It is there- fore recommended that (1) the staff be directed to proceed. with the procurement and installation of a 14-inch Fairbanks Morse model 5720 pump and appurtenances aS' quoted by John Stang Corporation at a trade-in price not to exceed $3,500 plus tax and freight and that (2) the staff be directed to install a District-owned 14-inch modified wet pit pwnp in lieu of purchasing and installing a new pwnp for $16,500. Agenda Item #12(b) VV'/l e/cir,,b -I- W. N. Clarke, Sr. Mainten·ance S,uperintendent All Districts ~- RESOLUTION NO. f2-86 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR IN-PLACE DENSITY TESTS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS . NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR IN-PLACE DENSITY TESTS TO DETERMINE RELATIVE COMPACTION OF BACKFILL * * '* * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section l. That the certain agreement by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, and the COUNTY OF ORANGE, for the fisc~l year 1972-73, for conduct of in-place density tests to determine the relative compaction of backfill connected with the installation of sewers within public rights of way by said Districts, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2 .. That the General Manager be authorized and directed to execute said .agreement on behalf of the County Sanitation Districts, as prepared by ·the County Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED, at a regular meeting held on June 14, 1972. Agenda Item #12(d) -J-All Districts ENGINEERS• ARCHITECTS 412 SOUTH LYON STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHON~ ( 714> 547-4471 May 23, .1972 Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County P. 0 ~ Box 81 27 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention Mr. Ray E. Lewis, Deputy Chief Engineer ADDRESS REPLY TO P.O. BOX 178 Greenvifle-Sullivan Trunk, Siphon at Warner AventJe and Greenville Street The existing siphon has an approximate capacity of 8. 0 mgd, which represents about 76 percent of the 10.5 mgd gravity capacity of the trunk sewer both upstream and downstream of the siphon. Upstream backwatering, which has occurred in the past, is the result of insufficient available head at the siphon for conveying flows in excess of 8.0 mgd. Since the system will hydraulically try to compensate for the deficiency, trunk capacity is nature lly reduced because of the backwateri ng. Also, because of the flat grade in this area, backwatering effects could extend several miles upstream in the trunk. In order for the system to operate at near maximum gravify capacity, remedial work will hove to be performed on the siphon. It appears at this time that probably a single- barrel siphon, 20 or 33 inches in diameter, will cause the least head loss while still maintaining minimum velocities at low flow and at the same time bring the system up to near maximum gravity capacity. The construction cost estimate of the remedial work is $25,000. We will prepare plans and specifications and provide the usual engineering services for this project at a lump sum fee of $2, 350. Field :;urveying for design and construction wi 11 be at the hourly rates of $51 per hour for et three-man survey party, $41 per hour for a two- man survey party, and $21 per hour for a licensed .surveyor. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING A N 0 ~,RCHITECTURAL sE::.~vlCES Agenda Item #34 K-1 District 1 Page 2 County Sanitation District No. of Oransa County May 23, 1972 We are prepared to proceed with the work upon authorization fr.om the district and estimate plans and specifications can be ready five weeks after receiving notice to proceed. We suggest that construction be done th is summer and completed a.head of the winter season, since the siphon does cross under a large storm-drain system. BOYLE ENGINEERING (l.,,_,w_,u..~h--;;_c' J'::YI 9 . Conrad Hohener, Jr. C. E. 10951 Id BOYLE ENGINEER!NG Agenda Item #34 K-2 District 1 J. W. K LUG DEVELOPMENT c 0., I N C. 4540 CAMPUS DRIVE · NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 · (714) 546 -8801 May 26, 1972 Honorable Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County 10844 Ellis ~venue Fountain Valley, California Re: Tract 6232 l\nnexation Gentlemen: We are requesting this tract be annexed to County Sanitation District ~1Uinber 7. This property is part of the Estate of.George C. Randell, dee.eased. The l-.drninis trator of this property is John A. Siegel, 18001 East rourtl1 Street, Suite A, Tustin, ·California 92680. . The assesseo value of this parcel of land as shown on the last assessrnent roll of Orange County is $57,850.00. This property is presently 1mde\reloped, but will be subdivided into.65 10,000 sq. ft. lots ~ith a design .sewer.discharge of 25,270 gal. per day. In addition to the above information, please find enclosed: (1) complete le9al description ;md total area; (2) rep.roducible :map of property; and (3) title report. Very truly your?, ~ TLC/cy enclosure -Check for $325.00 Agenda Item #38 -L-District 7 CONTRACTOR: JOP· cou:~TY SA:HTATim: DISTRICTS or-ORA~:GE cou:;ry P. O. Box 3127 -108~4 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 ----------------------------------------- _____________________________ _;.., __________ ~------.;..._----------------------------- Amount of this Change Order (ADD) ei)~ $ 665.53 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. . REFERENCE: Contractor's letter to the District date<l April 20, 1972 ·~. The final station and termination structure at Contract 7-6-3 were novc<l two-feet northerly and in or<ler that the planned manhole at Station 67+79.13 ~ould be on station the Contractor was directed to modify a length of manufactured pipe and the PVC lin~r plate to accommodate this change,. ,, ·. The Contractor was directed to remove and replace on " higher grade the 8-inch VCP SC\-.'er at St~ ti on 101+30± so that it would not conflict with the 42-inch RCP sewer. This 8-inch Vt::P sewer was not shown on the plans. ADD ADD TOTAL ADD THIS CHANGE ORDER Original Contract Price Prev •... Au th. Chanoes · 0 . This Change (ADD) cocoocax) Amended Contract Price ~ Hoard authorization date: Approved: $296.00 $36~~53 $665.53 \ $ 486,103.70 $ o.oo $ 665.53 s 486,774.23 June 14, 1972 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California .• li: Y_....·----------------------~~~~~-Contra..:tor ·-_ Agenda It em # 4 0 -M-District 7 l..U u., ~ 1 .:...~.., .t ..... ~ ·J. l. v... Lil...:::. .r ;~ ... L.,, _ :::> v.: ' .... :-.. ~ .. J:. \.... v 1.,;., l. =. P 0 ..... f"'\ x 31 27 -10 '.:.J '• " ~ 1, . C", /I • • n~ _ c~~ ~ -1-~ve~ue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. N0. _____ 3 __________ __ COHTRACTOR: NORTHERN CONTRACTING cm.IPANY DATE: June 14, 1972 JOB: REiJIIILL INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 6, 7 & 8, JOB NO. 7-6-4 Amount of this change order (ADD) {JmNtitrXJ $ 2,905.55 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Adjustment of Quantities· ADD Item Unit From To 3. 4 7 DEDUCT Item 8 16 17 L.F. L.F. L.F. Unit - L.F. Ea. C.Y. 138 139 1060 1162 32 .33 From To · 32 22 2 .0 10 6 ~ard authorization date: June 14, 1972 1 @ $37.85/L.F. 102 @· $32.85/L.F. 1 @ $17.00/L.F. ADD .. ADD ADD TOTAL ADD 10 @ $8.00/L.F. DEDUCT 2 @ $150.00/Ea. DEDUCT 4 @ $30.00/C.Y. DEDUCT TOTAL DEDUCT TOTAL ADD THIS CHANGE ORDER Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes fhis Change (ADD)~~ Amended Contract Price Approved: $ 37.85 3,350.70 17.00 $ 3,405.55· 80.00 300.00 120.00 $ 500.00 $ 2,905.55 $486,108.70 $ .665.53 $ 2,905.55 $489,679.78 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange ~aunty, California . By------------------~~~--~-----Ch i e f Eng.ineer ? .. - By-·-~----------------------------Cont!"9..Ct~r. Agenda Item #41 -N-District 7 COU~ffY S.\:HTATio>; DISTRICTS OF ORA~:GE cou::TY P. O. Box 8127 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. 4 co:·nRACTOR: NORTHERN CONTRACTJ;~G co:.JPAl\lY DATE J-u-1-1e~1-4--,-1-9,..._,..7-2------- JOP· REDHILL HHERCEPTOR, REACHES 6, 7 & 8, JOB NO. 7-6-4 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ o.oo ------- In accordance with contract provisions, the following C-hanges in the contract and/or contract work are 11ereby authorized and ~s compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from~the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's letter to the District dated April 19, 1972. EXTENSION OF TI~E The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of time of 32 days <lue to the added time involved in obtain- ing the pernit from the Santa Pe Railroad for tunnel- ing under their tracks. Time Extension TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 32 calendar days 32 calendar davs SUMMARY Original Contract Date Original Contract Tirae Original Completion Date Time Extension Previous Change Orders Time Extension This Change Order Total_Extcnsion of Contract Time Revised-contract Time Revised Corapletion Date . . November 11, 1971 180 calendar days April 29, 1972 0 calendar days 32 calendar days ~2 calendar days 212 calendar days May 31 , 19 7 2 · . Original Contract Price Prev. Au th. Cha.nges $486,103.70 $ 3,571.08 Bo~d authorization date: June 14, 1972 .. Agenda Item #42 This Change (ADD)(DEDUCT) $ 0.00 Amended Contract Price $489,679.78 -0- Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange Coµnty, California By----------------~~-.---~----~~ Contractor District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 72-87-7 ACCEPTJNG CONTRACT NO. 7-6-4 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY;. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-o-4 AS COMPLETE * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Northern Contracting Company, · has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for the Red ~11 Interceptor, Reaches 6, 7 & 8, Contract No. 7-6-4, on May 31, 1972; and, Section 2. That by letter, Boyle Engineering, District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the· terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said engineers' recommendation, which-said recommenda- tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the Red Hill Interceptor, Reaches 6, 7 & 8, Contract No. 7-6-4, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 11th day of November, 1971; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1972. Agenda Item #43 -P-District 7 .11[/d ~M,'!· ~~'.!-~'-...;· ... ~ _j ENGINEERING 0 ENGINEERS• ARCHITECTS 412 SOUTH LYON STREET SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHON~ 1714> 547-4471 ADDRESS REPLY TO P.O. BOX 178 June 8, 1972 Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention Mr. Ray E. Lewis, Deputy Chief Engineer Jamboree Road Sub trunk No. 1 ~ Reach 47 In response to your request, we submit the fol lowing proposal for engineering services to prepare plans and specifications and to provide construction staking for subiect master plan foci I ity. The project will begin at Main Street and Jamboree Boulevard and extend approxi- mately l, 250 feet northeasterly in Jamboree Boulevard. Estimated construction cost is $36,000. Design of the subtrunk vti 11 cor.form to the district's standards. The Irvine Industrial Complex will be the contracting agency and will let the contract to the lowest responsible bidder through public bidding procedures. Specification format wi II conform to Irvine I ndushia I Complex standards. Our fee for preparing plans and specifications will be a lump sum amount of $1 ,400. Field surveys wi 11 be required in order to prepare the plans and specifications. These surveys include taking topogrcph}' and culture within the project limits. We propose that all field surveys for design, as well as.construction staking, be performed On a per di em basis Ot $51 per hour for 0 3-man Survey CreW I $41 per hour for a 2-man survey crew, and $21 per hour for o Ii censed surveyor. We are ready to proceed with the work upon receiving authorization. BOYLE ENGINEERING ?&,, -'/ I./ i _,~ ·.·V' , y I I ..... tA.t.C..· V' '-/(.>. ,~ I.~. I 0 Conrad Hohener, Jr. C. E. 10951 Id PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER!NG" AND Agenda Item #44 -Q-· -~ RCHITECTURAL SERVICES District 7 April 3, 1972 Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District Number Two 10844 Ellis Avenue Post Off ice Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Fred Harper General Manager FILED In the Office of the Secr-:?.t.ary County Sanitation District No ~ APR 1 2 1972 -·- Subject: Request For Annexation Into Sanitation District Nu.~ber 2 Gentlemen: On behalf of Anaheim Hills Inc., and Texaco Ventures, Inc., I respectfully submit to you this request for annexation into Sanitation ·District Nu~ber Two for 1024.89 acres of land as described in the map and legal description attached. Also, enclosed is a check in the amount of $325 to cover the orig- inal application fee. Anaheim Hills is presently developing on part of the former Nohl Ranch. During this first phase of annexation, we are requesting annexation into the district for that portion of the Anaheim Hills project for which more specific plans of development are now being prepared. I would like to draw your attention to the fact that within the annexation area there presently exists three easements which prevent any development from occurring on these three areas. We therefore, request that the acre fee for these un- developable easements be waived although they will be enclosed in the total annexation area. These easements are as follows: Four Corners Pipeline, Me- tropolitan Water District and Southern California Edison. This amounts to a total of 19.15 acres. We understand that the present annexation fee per acre into Sanitation District Number Two is $369. Because of the large area of land requested in th.is annex- ation, we respectfully request another payment method of these fees. We have discussed this matter with members of your staff and have.been advised that we may proceed by placing our total a~ount of fees on our taxes and prorate them over a five year period of ti~e in five equal encrements. 1665 SOUTH BROOKHURST, ANAHEIM. CALIFORNIA 92804, TELEPHONE (714) 530-7960 Agenda Item #50 R-1 District 2 Board of Directors ·orange County Sanitation District Number Two -2- We look forward to working very closely with you on this annexation. We know that it will enhance not only the development of this specific area, but will assist the Sanitation District by increasing your total assessable land inven- tory. If there is any additional information we may be able to provide for you, we will certainly do so as soon as possible. Sincerely, \ · ~W~~sv President WJS:lm Agenda Item #50 · R-2 District 2 June 9, 1972 Board of Directors County of Orange Sanitation District No. 2 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Fred Harper Gentlemen: .. Subject: Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 1 Into Sanitation District Included in this filing for annexation is a request that aIU?-exation fees for 1,024.89 acres of the annexation area be paid in five equal annual installments on the tax bill. The directors might possibly be concerned as to how these tax payments will be made in lieu of the fact that over the next five years much of the property will be sold tu building .companies and in turn to indivi.dual home owners. ·As you know, property taxes, as they becone due, must be paid by the in- dividual owners of the property. When we as land owners sell our property, full notice of all taxes and/or assessnents against the land must be made · publicly. In turn, any builder who acquires land from Anaheim Hills must make a public disclosure to any potential buyers of the same taxes and/or assessments to be assumed. Using this method, required by law, all buyers are completely advised of the condition of the land under purchase and all encumbrances thereon. I hope this will help to clarify our request. Plea.se let me know, if you need any further information. Sincerely, o~e~a~ ... James L. Barisic Vice President JLB:lm 380 ANAHEIM HILLS ROAD, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92806 PHONE (714) 998-2000 Agenda Item #50 R-3 District 2 RESOLUTION NO. 72-46-2 ANNEXATION NO. 6 -ANAHEIM HILLS ANNEXATION NO. 1 A IIBSOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIHECTOP~ OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE INITIATION.OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO THE DISTJ:ITCT ( ANNEXATION NO. 6 -ANAHEIM HILLS ANNEXATION NO. 1 ) SUBJECT TO CERTAIN CONDITIONS . * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the City of Anaheim has requested annexation of approximately 312.35 acres of territory· to County Sanitation District No. 2 by means of a lett~r dated March 6, 1972, received and filed by the Board of Directors on April 12, 1972; and, · WHEREAS, Anaheim Hills, Inc. and Texaco Ventures, Inc. have requested annexation of approximately 1,024.89 acres of territory to County Sanitation District No. 2 by means of a letter dated April 3, 1972, received and filed by the Board of.Directors on April 12, 1972; and, WHEREAS, on May 24, 1972 the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 passed a motion declaring its intent to adopt a resolution to initiate proceedings to annex said territor~ subject to certain conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: That an application for annexation of territory to itself be made to the Local Agency Formation Commission as follows: Section 1. That this proposal is made pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California; and, Section 2. That this application is for the purpose of annexing 1,337.24 acres a.s requested by the owners of said property; and, Section·3. That the territory to be annexed is uninhabited; and, Agenda Item #51 S-1 District 2 Section 4. That so.id territory requested t") be annexed by the City of Anaheim and Anaheim Hills, Inc., and Texaco Ventures, Inc. can be most e~peditiously annexed by combining into one proceeding to be designated "Annexation No. 6 -Anaheim Hills Annexation No. lu, the boundaries of which are more particularly described and delineated on Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 5. That said annexation shall be -subject to the following: (1) That the fees to be paid for said annexation shall be as .established by the Board of Directors pursuant upon completion of the study by the Special Committee for studying Annexation and Connection Fee Policies; and, ( 2) ·That the maximum flow acceptable from the area proposed to be annexed shall not exceed 350,000 gallons per day to be discharged during daily low flow periods as determined by the Districts' engineers until such time as facilities are .constructed to relieve the system; and; (3) That temporary facilities required to serve the area proposed to be annexed shall be installed and maintained at no cost to the District; and, Section 6. That the City of Anaheim be urged to explore the feasibility of requiring installation of low volume plumbing fixtures in the area proposed to be annexed; and, Section 7. That request is hereby made that such proceedings as required by· law be taken to complete this annexation. PASSED AND ADOPTED, at a regular meeting held on June 14, 1972. Agenda Item #51 S-2 District 2 hofi!:rv ~ ,,sor I at e ... f coNsuLTING c1v1L ENGINEERS 121 EAST WASHINGTON AVENUE •.SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 TELEPHONE 71-4 I 5-41-5301 June 2, 1972 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California P. O. Box 8t27 · Fountain Valley, California 92708 ATTENTION: Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager Dear Mr. Harper: In accordance with Mr. Harper's request, we are pleased to submit this proposal for .furnishing engineering servic~s for the preparation of the plans and specifications for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer from Katella Avenue to the Riverside Freeway. Included with the project is a tie-in with the City of Anaheim sewer at Jefferson St. (Robert Finnell River Crossing). The project is an important element in the District's Master Plan of trunk sewers because it will i~tercept and divert flows away from the district's existing Newhope Placentia trunk sewer system, which is rapidly reaching its design capacity. This is the second reach of the project and will extend the sewer upstream from Katella Avenue to the vicinity of the Riverside Freeway. At this point, other major sewer projects will tie into the inter- ceptor sew~r, thereby relieving the existing system. Sufficient capacity will be provided in the interceptor for the needs of the District; and, in addition, 30 mgd c3pacity will be provided for the upper basin if the Chino Basin Municipal i·7ater District elects to proceed with basin-wide interceptor sewer project. As now planned, the project will consist of approximately four miles of 54-inch dia~eter reinforced concrete pipe. If the District elects to construct a larger capacity from Plant 1 to Katella Avenue (Contract 2-14-1), then two alternate pipe sizes can be included in this contract in order to conform to the downstream project. Included with the project is a 21-inch river crossing at Jeffer- son Street that will connect the existing Santa Ana Canyon trunk sewer in the City of Anaheim to the interceptor sewer. This diversion will relieve the District's Olive sub-trunk sewer. The total estimated cost, including construction, engineering, and other incidental costs, is $3,200,000. As now planned, $1,200,000. of the total cost would be paid by the Chino Basin Municipa1 Wa~er District. We will perform the following profession~l engineering services for the project in accordance with the following: Agenda Item #52 (1) Hold conferences with District's staff, other interested agen- cies5 and private property owners who niay be involved in the project. T-1 District 2 June 2, 1972 Page 2 of 3 (2) Assist in the preparation of the documents and reports for federal and state grants. 'Th~ preparation of a project report in accordance with the State Water Resources Control Board guidelines will be done as a separate work item. (3) Make arrangements for and coordination of field surveys, soils investigations, and related work. (4) Prepare preliminary design. studies for review and approval. (5) Assist in obtaining permits from the Orange County Flood Control District, the.Orange County Water Dist~ict, the California State Division of Highways, and other affected agencies. (6) Prepare construction plans and specifications. (7) Prepare estimates of quantities and cost estimates. (8) Deliver the original plans and specifications to the District for reproduction by the District. (9) Prepare legal descriptions and maps for right. of way acquisition as required. (10) Work with appraiser and attorney in right of way matters. (11) Assist the District in securing and tabulating bids, analyzing bid results, and awarding contract. (12) Check shop and working drawings as may be submitted by the contractor. (13) Furnish consultation and advice to the District during construction. (14) Make a final inspec~ion and prepare a report on the completed pro- ject. (15) Prepare "As built" drawings of the completed work and file the original drawings with the District. We propose to provide the services in Items 1 through 15 for a basic fee of $107,920. In addition, a Project Report in accordance with the guidelines of the State Water Resources Control Board will be needed. We propose to prepare this report on a per diem basis at a cost not to exceed $8,500, in accordance with our current rates as shCY.':'n in the attDched schedule. It is suggested that pay~ent be monthly o~ a percentage-co~pleted basis up to 90 percent at tiIBe of delivery cf the plans and specifications, and 100 per- cent payment when the work is cor:1pleted and accepted by the District. Field stirveys will be required to prepare the plans and specifications and also for construction staking. ~fapping by aerial photography r.1ay also be utilized. In addition, soils i~~estigati~ns ~ill be ~ceded along the route of the project. We propose thcit all field surveys be perfonr.ed on a per diem basis at the follm.Ting hourly rates: 3-man survey party -$50 .00 per hour, Agenda Item #52 T-2 District 2 June 2, 1972 Page 3 of 3 2-man survey party -$40.00 per hour, and survey supervisor -$20.00 per hour. Aerial mapping and soils investigations costs will be billed at our actual cost upon prior approval by District staff. Payment is to be monthly as invoiced. In the event the District requires daily inspection s~rvices, we propose to provide this service, upon written request by the District, at an hourly rate of $12.00. We propose that all outside services required and approved by the District, such as plant inspection for quality control for materials used on project construction, will be paid directly by the District upon presentation of a statement of such outside services with the engineer's ceFti~ication. If we are authorized to proceed with this work at the June 14th board meeting, we plan to have the project report co~pleted by Septe~ber 1, 1972 and the Plans and ,Specifications corr:pleted by l.farch 1, 1973. rnis schedule will provide for sufficient ti~e to co~plete construction in accordance with the schedule previously discussed with the board. Very truly yours, Lowry and Associates /fa.JL)~ Donald J. Martinson President DJM:skc Agenda Item #52 T-3 District 2 U_. ()fl2'rv Ns.s·or la I es coNsuLTING c1v1L ENGINEERS 121 EAST WASHINGTON AVENUE • SANTA ANA.CALIFORNIA 92701 TELEPHONE 7•• I !5•1-5301 May .30. 19 72 STM"DARD SCHEDULE OF CO~fi'E~rnATION ~ Applicable for Services Furnished on Per Day or Per Hour Basis Classification Per Day Per Hour Principal-------------------~----$250.00---~----------$32.50 Senior Engineers.------------------$210. 00-"7-----------:-$27. 50 Engineers--------------------------$180.00--------------$22.50 Associate Engineers-------------$1.65. 00-------------$21.00 Assistant Engineers---------------$150.00--------------$18.75 Senior Draftsrnan-------------------$150.00--------------$18.75 I Draftsman--------------------------$130.00---~----------$16.50 . Clerical---------------------------$ 78.00----------~---$ 9.75 Agenda Item #52 T-4 District 2 , . Jt Oill't"V ssorlates May 30, 1972 CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 121 EAST WASHINGTON AVENUE • SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 9270 I TELEPHONE 71~ I 5 .. 1-5301 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 ATIENTION: Xr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager Dear Mr. Harper: In accordance with Hr. Harper's request, we are pleased to submit this proposal for providing engineering services for the preliminary design of the Yorba Linda Pump Station and Force !:iain, the Kraemer Interceptor, the Palm Drive Interceptor, and the Cc:rbcn Canyon Interceptor. These projects are needed to relieve the existing trunk sewer sy~tem in the northerly portion of the District, and the timing of their construction should be coordinated with the construction of the Santa Ana River Inter- ceptor. The projects are outlined in the Districts, "Interim Five Year Master Plan of Waste Water Facilities; ~farch, 19 71." In that report it was shown that the existing system is not adequate to handle the a~ticipated flows in the area. Recent flow measurements taken in the district's system confirm that the system is now flowing at near capacity, and that it is essential to proceed with the detailed planning for these projects. It is proposed to re-calculate the design capacities of these projects based on.the latest master plans of the cities and the county, map the routes .of the projects, prepare prelfmir.ary plans_, prepare construction cost estimates, explore the possibilities of federal and state grant assist- ance, and if favorable prepare the necessary documents to apply for such grants. The preliminary total cost estimate of these projects is $2,990,000. It is proposed that the preliminary design work as described above be accom- plished on a time and expense basis in accordance with our standard rates, a copy of which is attached. The largest single expense will be the mapping of the routes, which can most economicci.lly be accomplished by aerial photo- graphy mapping methods. It is proposed that this cost be billed to the district at our actual cost, subject to prior 2pproval of the district staff. It is further proposed that a maximum cos~ ·of $50,000 be authorized, includ- ing preliminary engineering anq mapping. Th~ cost of our preli~inary engi- neering work would be deducted from the final design fees upon i~plerr.entation of final design. Agenda Item #53 U-1 District 2 , 1 f • Nay 30, 19 72 Page 2 of 2 If authorized at the June 14th board meeting, the work can be accom- plished in accordance ~ith the prqposed schedule for the Santa Ana River Interceptor. Very truly yours, Lowry & Associates ~o~ Donald J. lrtinson President DJM:skc Attachment District 2 Agenda Item #53 U-2 • J l • Jt Ofil'TV .s·sorlotes CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 121 EAST WASHINGTON AVENUE • SANTA ANA.CALIFORNIA 92701 TELEPHONE 71• I 541-5301 May 30. 1972 STANDARD SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION Applicable for Services Furnished on Per Day or Per Hour Basis Classification Per Day Per Hour Principal--------------------------$250.00--------------$32.50 Senior Engineers-------------------$210.00-------------~$27.50 Engineers--------------------------$180.00--------------$22.50 Associate Engineers----------------$i6s.oo--------------$21.00 Assistant Engineers----------------$150.00--------------$18.75 Senior Draftsman-------------------$150.00--------------$18.75 Draftsman--------------------------$130.00--------------$16.50 Clerical---------------------------$ 78.00----------~---$ 9.75 Agenda Item #53 U-3 District 2 To: From: S:.ibject: GENERAL Agenda Item No. 3 9 M E M 0 R A N D U M Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager Mr. Ray E. Lewis Deputy Chief Engineer COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 June 9, 1972 Request from City of Orange regarding Trunk Sewer Services for Orange Park Acres On February 1Stl1, Mr. John Fonley, the Director of Public Works of the City of Orange transmitted three route studies for proposed sewer facilities in the Orange Park Acres for the District's consideration. Included in the city's request to provide sewerage facilities to two areas witl1in the city limits of the City of Orange was the Handy Creek alignment which is the alignment as shown in the .Master Plan of· Trunk Sewer Facilities as adopted by the Board of Directors of District No. 7 in 1969. The city proposed two alternate routes to the Handy Creek alignment that they felt could be built in public right of ways, thus avoiding acquisition of sanitary sewer casements along the llandy Creek alignment. The city inquired also whether an alternate route woulc.1 meet the parameters of the District and the qualifications for a re- imbursement as a trunk sewer facility at some time in the future. BACKGROUND At the adjourned regular meeting of District !fo. 7 on March 21, 1972, the staff presented the three alternate alignments proposed by the City of Orange for the construction of ~wer facilities to serve portions within the Orange Park Acres area within the City of Orange. After a brief discussion with the directors, the staff was instructed to ·work closely with the Orange County Planning Department and the city staff of the City of Orange to recommend an alignment that would best serve the area and qualify for a District trunk facility. Concurrently with the city's request, the County Planning Department, under the direction of the Board of Supervisors, conducted a study of the public works improvements necessary in the Orange Park Acres aloIJg with the zoning in the area. Hr. Forrest Dickason met with repre- sentatives of the Flood Control District, the Health Department, the Road Departrnent and with the Sanitation District and requested a report from each department regarding public facilities in the area. "-"'A report was filed with the Board of Supervisors on April 12th and ref erred to the Planning Cb1amiss ion for hearing on the report. Along COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 To: Mr. Fred A. Harper June 9, 1972 Page Two (714) 962-2411 with the report of the public facilities, the Board of Supervisors considered a Division of Land (Division of Land No. 1232-Revised - Brock) of a ten-acre site in the Orange Park Acres area and requested a report from the Health Department regarding sewerage disposal in the area. The Health Department along with the Building Department has denied any building permits in the area pending the installation of a sanitary sewer system. Basically, the report from the Health Department recommended that no development be granted until such time as sanitary sewers are in t11e area. An alternate solution was offered whereby development could proceed on one-acre sites with private clisposal systems that were properly engineered and providing a 100% additional capacity plus the assurance of proper maintenance through a septic tank maintenance district. Copy of the health officer's recommendations are attached herewith. TRUNK SEWER AL I GN~lENT STUD I ES On May 18th, I requested a meeting of the Planning Department, members from the Engineering Department of the City of Orange, representatives of potential developers in ti1e area and members from the Orange Park Acres Homeowners Association. It was concluded at this meeting that the Sanitation District staff would recommend to the Board of Directors an alignment that would fulfill the parameters of a trunk sewer facility and which would also answer the request of the City of Orange regarding sewer facilities in the area. It is my personal opinion that this meeting was very successful because all parties agreed to consider only the sanitary sewer needs in the area and <livorce any decision from the land use question. The staff has diligently attempted to keep all parties informed of the progress of the studies being conducted. After several meetings with the engineering staff of t11e City of Orange, the District's consulting engineers an<l tl1e engineering staff, it is felt that the alignment as shown on the attached map would best meet the immediate needs of the area. This alignment <loes not coincide with the Handy Creek alignment as shown on the Master Plan, but it is felt that the District's plans are still mai11tained in the recommen<lcd revised alignment and this alignment can be implemented to serve the immediate needs in the area. It should be noted that there has been ~ formal petition filed with the Hoard of Supervisors by over 100 property owners in the unincorporated area (also outside of District No. 7 boundaries) requesting their need for sanitary sewers. A summary of the alignment studies are as outlined below: (Analysis not·complete this date -Final review being completed by Boyle Engineering and ci.ty staff to be presented at Board. i\leeting, \\ednesday June 14th. ) .. tt •. .• HEAL T !\ n r: I'/. !n }.\En T Honor2.blt: Bo;ird of Supervisors . County of Orange -Santa Ana, California JOHN R. Prll!_?, .1·' •• D. HEf.LTH OrFICE.P • SA HT A A~~ A 0 ;:' F" IC E 6 4 5 tl CRT H f,O:;:; S 7 ~\:..ET SANTA MlA, c>.:....!For:.•i;;.. 5;:7:,:-; TELEPHO!iE: oH-31 H J.!0Tlln9 l.dc'o'S:.: P. 0. Cor 355 Santo Anc, Coft(c:nlo ')2701 AHAHEm OFFICE 1011 SOUTtl EA$T STR!::ET #.tlAHEIM, C/1.LIFOf~~llA TEL EPHOS E: 776-5551 Mot/Jn~ AddrcH: P.O. Cor 355 Sonta.Ana, Caltforr.la 92701 Marc~ 6, 1972 SUBJECT: Appeal on condition of app;·o\·;1,) No. l of Division of Land No. 1323 Revisctl -Brock. BRIEF: · ·Gentle1ncn: The llc:-!llh Officer rcc0mnn:.'.r;d~; that Coridition of i'\ppYoval No. 1, on Djvision of Land l'~u. B?3, "i.:cvj::;ed -Broe):, be upheld, with possible co~13idcr~tio:n. of an ;:lli:n1c-dive as prcsc:ited in the Health Department report d'1tcd }"'ebruary 25, 197?.. On Jan ua rr 12, 1972, your Bonor~tblc JJ0:1 nl heard an a:ppeal from ~fr. Norrnan B roc1-: .. regarding Condit.ion of I~pprova) Noc l irn1)(1~.ct1 by tJ1c Pla.nning Com:·nission on Divis ion of L2nd No. 13 2 3, H evis ec1. Tlih: co;1d ition invo l vcd s ew2.gc cli s po s al, and \vas based on a rccorruncndalion of lLc Health Depad1ncnt. .At the rcqu~s t of the appJiccmt you continued the hcztring lo !./arch 8, 1972. Mr .. Brock also requesteC: this Department to restudy the matter m the interim and report our findings 2nd . r.ecornmcndc.tions to you. Subsequently, we were ?-sked by the PlanniL~, Dc.parlJ.11ent to study the question of sewcige disposal in c.ll of Or:lnge P2.rk Acres ~~s part of a review of a proposed comtnnnity plan prepared by resident~ of th•_: area. 'I'his reviev.: also was requested by your Board. Attached hereto is a report entitled 11 1~ Sur\'cy of IncJivic1ual Se\vage Disposal Syste~s! Oranec Park Acres, County of.01·:rn~c, C>Jifornia 11 dated February 25, 1972. \'/e bclicv e the find inr, s, conclus j o:D s and re ccnn: i en cb. t ions contained in this report will serve lo answer both of the ~1b0vc-rncnlio11cd requests, being 2pplicable to the subject division of land as well a~~ the ::1 re;.'. generally. You will note, upon rc;:.<ling the report, th~:l ~~-oil conditio:1s in inost of Ora.nge P.?_rk ·Acres are not well suilcd for the c1jspo~;;j of :;c.,~:agt> by individual systE;ms. Oi.::- ' Honorable Board of Supervisors March 6, 1972 -- .---· . recom.mcndation is that alternate n1e;m3 of disposal be· provided, with sanitary .sewers being the rnet1~o_d of cho"ice. \Vcll-cnginccred 5ndiviclual sy.stcn1s, em- ploying advanced design tc chniq ue s, nd ~;;hi po;> s jb J y fun c lion, but the exp ens c would be great and the likelihood of contjm.l::~d successful opcratio~ sliin . . . .. ... ... . . . ~ .RECOM1v1EN_pATION: -. . '-. --. -. . · --.. .. . .. ..... -- -.--.. . -. . . . '· ---I ... -· ..... · ........ .:. .. - c-: . .;_-:·.:. ..... -t:' c :· • :·' ........ --.. F· -... __ .:. .. -·"~· . ___ Attachmcn.t .. _ . •. -t:. ·-• ~ • -• • -. . . . . . " - -!-. : : ~ :·.: . .. ; ~ --. .. ; ... . . .. - -·-: .. : ::. ~- ..... r ... ,_-. . -.. --.... : . .. . . . :· ~ -·• ::_ .... : : ~ : ::: ::. ::-. : ! . ' : • :--. . : .. G. :--. = ..... ~ : ..... -.. - ..:... -•f -· . -.· Condit~on of Apprc1v<1.l No. 1, the provision of sanitary sewers f~r lhc subject division of land, should b.c upheld. Ir:dividual syf;lcr11~'. ~;l10ulcl only be approved, for a ~rescribcd period of lime unLD sewers arc available, under the concHlioHs ~-;tated jn the attached report. , . . Rc!-;peclfully $llbmiltcd, Qr::L--I~ C2£5_/Jj>o [';JOJlNR. J=.>lJU~P, M.D. Health Officer County of Orange ·DATE~ '1 -..) VI\ \ I• I \ J • ~ 1" > I; 'it J r J' ; I• I • • "" ' .• -, : .. "'' l. Oranr,c Par~ /\c~-'-'!~ County of Orclnf.C California Fcbru~ry > 197 2 . . . . R~QUESTED BY! Orange County Plannin~ Department . I CO:\DUCTED BY: .· REPORT t .. 1RITTEN BY: SUH~IP .. RY OF FINDINGS: John E. ·Haincsf R.S. Environmcn tal Heal th Spccialis t Andrew PC'.:ir..son AssisLrnt Envirornncntal. Health Sanitarian Rich a rd Gn:dzins~~i Assislanl Environmental Health Sanitarian W'1ter Quality Control Sccticn Divis i on o f En vi r om~ cu ta 1 H c .:! l th Orange County H~al tI! De par t~cn t Harlan G. Schroth, R.S. r:nviro1mcntal Health Engineering Spe.cialist O~ange County Heal th Depart:-:1.:?nt .. '. •I During the r.:on ths of J:!nua ry and February, 1S71., the Or c:ngt; Col!n ty Ee al th D~? a r t:..~:r t conducted a survey of individual scwa£C systc~ conditions i~ Orange Park Acres, an unincorporated area of Orange County. The~survcy co~sisted of personal inte=vi8:s ·vi th r cs id e: n ts , f i e 1 d obs c r v a ti on s and a r c v i cw of a 11 av 2 il ab 1 e ind iv i di; a 1 s c -;.:-a ;:: e disposal pu:::ping records, soil maps, well lozs ~:nd both che:~.ical and bactedolozi.cal sampling of do~cstic ~ell water and suspected sc~aEC overflows. The findin~s o~ the survey are se~~":'larizcd as follows: i~ A review of geological infor~ation of the Oranze Park Acres area indicates that sub-surface· soils are variable in coc1position. As a result, the percolative capacity of the sub-soils varies fro~ one sub area to anothe=, · f · 6 ~ rr ,.. h · l · 3 0 ~, d d · ~ '"! rangir.g ro::l very poor in :>," oI t .e area, marg1.na in ·, .. a~ goo 1.n :>,.. 2o In so~e-sections of the area, the variable surface topogra?hY adds to the p~oblem of poor soil infiltratioa ch2r2ctcristics, ~aking these areas entirely unsuitable for the disposal of ~e~age effldent. · 3. Reports fro:-:1 ·cor:-_-nercial seY:age pt!r::p2rs> sub~:-iitted to the He2lth De?art~e.-.t, show that d'Jring the past three (3) ye~n:-s> fifty (50) .syst2:-::s hc_v~ ~.::~71 pumped, "t-:it!-1 seven (7) of these rc:q~Jidng tw0 or rJor12 pu;:'\pings h"i::hi:-. a ~eriod of one .hundred twc~ty· (120) days. 4. Inte:rvic'.·15 -;:it~ 143 of t:-ic2 300 :10;-:-.co~;~t;;·s in t"r 1 c• a.-:u:. :~:cicc.~2 2-sys~.::~ · fa i l u re r ~ t e o f l o /.. o v c :: the r:; ~) s t r-r.:'. c ·=-I~ t. .f :i. v 2 / ~ ,:t r ? c :· i o d . Al so 1 2 9 :.~ o : . the persons in L.: :-vi e'.Je:d .::c:7ti t tc d to ha vi nr, their ::>y s tc:-:L ?Ur:".? cc ou :-: z t 1 ~as~ once iincc inst~llatio~~ 5. Durin~. the field su"Cvcy> t' .. :o scwJ~_'.c: c[L:posal syslc.:r:is were 9bscrvcd to ~c ovc ~fl 0 1.J i ng •. 6. CurrcnLly, no ~oi1.·00·1~ing~; or pcrc.0l:1Lion lcsts arc required by the: Vr.::>;irt- n1cnt of Buil<li110 .:inJ Safely prior to lhc i.ssu.:rncc of a pcrrnit for thC! con·- struction of an incE.vidu.Jl sc\:.:igc disposal system • . "CONCLUSION A~D RECm1:--IEND...\TIO:·:S: . . . . Orange Park Acre~; area is gcncrdly· not m:l.l sui~ed for disposal of sewage by in8ivi- du.:il systc;ns •. This is cvicccccd_by the reC(;iLt history of disposal systcr.1 failures and the very lo•,., soil inti 1 Lr~ tion rates E.'xili bi tcd in· 65'/ .. of the a rca. Since r.n.:ch of the <level oped and devc 1 op~bl c 1 an cl lie~ \d th in ·this a rca > • ~ t is ou ~-O?i 7li on. the:. t sc\,'agc <lispo.:>.Jl systcr.1 f.Jilu::cs will continue>; even{£ no further dcvclop~cnt occu:-s> and td_ll increase· in frc_qucccy' in .Proportion with fu turc dcvc lo?r.1cn t. It is, t~ereforc~ recoCTncndcd that the ncccss~ry steps be initiated to prov!de altc:-- nate r.ic'1ns of sc'..?a~c disposal in the areas o[ poor infiltration char~cteristics. 'The in.ost obvious al~ern~tivc is~ .of course, to provide sc;.~itary scl;crs. Eo~·.Te'.'er, if ~ense. is no ol>j cc t~ clzibor2 tc > ,.;cll.-·c.llzjw~ered indivi du:i.l sys tens> u tiliz-ing ac\•2:-i.ced techniques such as soil rc2I2cc:-;1cnt at1d ev~ro·-lr:mspir;ttion, might possibly func~iou . in such areas. The chonccs of success a.re ~10 t too great. I~ is further rcco~T12il<led th2t if individual st::•.-:z:.ze dispos~l systc:-:i.s are pcr;:littcd .in the f~turc> _they .be .~ppro-Ycd only on t11c foJ.lo~d.ng condition:.:: i: That, prior to isst:ancc of a buiidi.nz perr.iit, a lo~ of soil borbgs a;;d ~results of pcrcola~Ion test be sub~itted to the D2pa~t~cnt of Building a~d Safety for cv.:!lu:.-: t~.on on C.1ch lot for '.?hich c1:1 appJ.icatio:l is nacc. The aforemcnt.io:-icd pcrc0lation test should h,:!· perfon;0d 2nd reported by a Registered Sanitari~n 1 Registered Civll or Sa;1it2ry Engineer, Registered Ceolozist or Regist~rcd Enginecr5ng Geologist. 2. That each proposed individual disposal, systco be designed by a Registe:-E:d Civil or Sanitary E:::!.3inecr or Enz.incc:-5. ng Gcologis t. · 3. That the proposed building site not be less than one acre. + 4. Thai{ aa acditio:ial ?2rcolation syste:::;, equal to 100/., of th~ o:-igi71al c2si.~:: cap2ci ty,. be cons true tcd and conncc ted <: t the tirr,c of or izina 1 cons tr:..: c tio-:1. 5. That r11e:.n1s be provided for assured routine preve1~tive ~aintenance of such sys_te::1s, such as b~ ... the formation of a :.cptic tank maintenance distric::. DISCUSS rm~: ?cope of· Inv es ti ~·2 tio~ · The Health D1::?2·:tr:~cnt conduc::ed a survey oi in<lividu..11 seu.J.gc disposal systc::l°s co:-:.- ditions in Or.:?n0c Park /·.~..:Es co~.unity, au urd.r~',:orporated area in Or-11it:;e Co~:-ity. ::1is 2 re a i s 1 o ca t e: <l in T t.; S , · R 9 1 .. r:.. S e c L i o tis 1 3 , J.Li , ~~ J } · 2 l-t > 2 5 ~ n cl 2 6 • Th c s u ~ v e y '·: 2 s c o:: - ·~ d~cted cu:-in~ t;1(' ~~ont.h~. of January .:incl ;:·c·i)ru.::~-=-r, 1972, cind consisted of the; f0llc:::.:-:z inves tf g<! tio~s: .-. .. . .. ·' .I -. - _L A hou~c lo hou:;c survc:y ' .. :a!; cc:11J~1r:.' .. u! Lo detect (~x1stin,6 sc ... :.:ize: ove:flo•.1.::; . and hot:1co\;,1e::-s ".:ere in Lcrv icwc.-d to i"lel('n:iinc lh<; his Lory of SC:\·:'4~C: S'J~ ~i::2 -pumpin~~ an<l failures. ~2. ·Availnblc gcolo~ical d.:lta on sub-·!;urfacc: soU and w:iLcr conditions w~s rev i c\,•c d • • 3.. Interviews were held with per :;onru.: 1 of U1c OrC1n0c· County Wci tcr District, Orange County Flood Control District~ U. S~ Ccolo~ical Survey OEfic~, Ora~~e County Building Deparlmcnt. ctncl t.L(' Orange Pc-:rk Acr0,::> ?<utual Water Co::1any. . . . . . . -:4. · All availnble He2lth Dcp~rtrr:ent pt::-;-:ping records fc>r septic tanks," see22ge. · piti and cesspools in the area were reviewed. ·· .:.:.:.. ·: :s~· _:sa~nples fro~n w.::i. Ler wcl ls and -s\1~·pcc led sewage overflows were collccte::d for. --· · :chemical and bactcriologicnl ~n:dys:>s. ! ~ . . ---. ... - -. :::-~ ":"" ..... :' -. .. .-~ ... -::-. -· -... ... . -... :. -:--· .. ::--The co:.i:mni ty of Orange Park Acres northern tot:n(~.:~ry ~>ceins at the wcstcr:i po:.-tion :.of the Sully-~:illl?r sand and gravel OfH~raU<m and follows S:tnt..ia6o Cree~: to··Villa :.park-Da::i. The ccis Lcrn !Jo:md.:lry begins at VU Li Lu}~ Jb:a v7Ld co:1 tir~:JC!S sot.: th thro!.1gh : l:he Vi 1 la P~ r~: D.:!::1 Re~io:1c. l Par~< site to :k:pi:~z;n /.v01we. The sou t!1c rn bot.:::co. ry proceeds \-:cs t alonE Cha.pi:L:rn Avc:1uc to Nc\;po•· L l\v~nuc > sou thcast alo:1g :\c:-~o:-t .. ~.'/c:-iue, ~approxirJately~2000 feet to the southern ~:-'1:)~>-· fif hills, follo~1b6 the rid;c li:-:e ~·::?s~- -er')' to-~ p ; t,. '..,n ..... ,., t',.... h'll . ~,.., ~ •· c·'·.-·r····-··· ·· · · · · T'-> ·-··-.. .,... b . ..._ · ......... ~--;....,~ r. c;. o ... n ,.;.,'t.:.1.1.: D-.;; 1. s in\...t::r~cc1.-. .;.~·~···,.:~ ,\\C.HLe. nl.;. \.,1;;;:, ... c ... n ou .. c ... _y _.;.;.::.-··-· a~ Chapo~n A.venu2 a;1d proceeds north follo 1.·:51:.:; L:he r:iclgc of the hills to Sa7ltiago Cree~:. In 1929;·:c. de:ep \·.'atcr well was drilled ncDr s~ntj~1go Creek in TL;S, and the Or a:1g c Park Ac res :!u tu '11 ~ .. \~ t~ r Co:. p .::.r· y ' . .'~! ::-; f o ~-c:cc~ to serve \.later piped in, Oranse Park Acres wa.s <livj(\:d j:1t.o parcel!-' of lane Homes were esta~lis:1cd in·some of .the p,rovc·s, .. R9W, Scctio~ 27, the J. :-ea. ~Ii ~:i for orc!1ards~ In the late 1940' s and early 19.50' s, chic~~c1 rc;ichcrs bc~J.n to estc.blish O;)Crati.c~s i:1 the area-that thrc'1ter.cd the continued exisluKe of the p<l~.Loral setti:-i.g. ··As a :-esul t, residents· in the late 1950's, ¥.~orking in.co:1j~mc~ion uith ~st.:\!Jlishcd poultry:::en, obtained oae acre ninicu~ lots (the.re arc 3o~:;e o~-:.c-half ~~ere lots), single fc~:-Jily residence zoning in ~ost of the area to maintain a desir~blc bala~ce bct~ccn rcsidc~­ tial and ra~ching activities in the co~~unity (Ord. No4 685, passed by the Boa~~ of Supe:.rvisors on }farch 9, 1954, designated tl1e .:1rca Et;-l acre r;:iinir..era lots). The nur.1.be:r of residents doubled in the dcc2de of Lhc late 1960's. At t~~ presc!1t t:!.~e, there are approxi::::ttely JOO families liviug in the: are:L Currently) twelve .(12) :-.e·.., homes are under COi1Struction in the .:ll"Ci!. ~·i.:my o~mers arc su~di.\•iding t:tcir la-::d a~d offering one, two, and three acre parcels fur sale. - -: # • .. • ..... . . - Since ~ost lots {n the a:-ea are lar~c (one ~er~), th~ Oran~e County D~pa=t=e~t of : J?!-1ild~n6 . and Sc. fo t y does no t require th a t pt:~ t' co l a t. ion t (! s t. s o :· so i1 b o ri:: s s b ~ ::-. 2 cl c in adv2 nee ·of co;;.s true tio:i. of ind i vi cua 1 s c'.:agc· di s~ws.1 l .:.; y s t.c~s. The "rule o £ t:·rn~~ 11 :applied is a s~ptic.tan~ plus one sce?age pit per bedroo~. In other ~o~ds, it is :assu:-.1e:d that a l~ac:-i:ng 2rc2 cc.:i. be cepcnd-::c epo:l to disp(is_c: of se-;.:agc ~:fluent regardless of the p~ysical pro~erties of th2 soil. , .I 'l'h\! hi~hc-::-cle:\"~~u.on.::> in the Jrca consist r:~aillJ y of' non··pc·n·oJ,, Liv·:! sc<lir~e::-it'-:rj :-od:s \.:hich consist of sandstone, shaJ.c, and siltstone~; i11cludi11i~ so:nc volc~nic rocks and rocks older than Tertiary. Lm;cr elevation$ exhibit strc~ia tcrrncc dcpo:d.t~ of late pJcistoce:n~ ancJ older alluvi~l dcposils consisl:in~ of scri1iconsolicJ[1tcc'l silt, snnd, z-::-~ve:.l and rubble h.:i 11in~ · · -wa tcr bcarin~ c~p.:ibili tics.. .. ! .. . Soi~s found a lonz San tiazo Creek cons is ls ·of ~,cnicon:;o lid at 6cJ s'i 1 t, sand ·and gr.;;·1c 1 having a high infiltratio~ c2p.:!!'>ility of grc~tcr th(ln two inches (2") per hou:-. Soils of this 1 ty?c arc found in 2pproxir.:ately f:iv(! pcrccill (5%) of the area. Elsc- wh c r c , a p? ro xi r;; :! t cl Y. th:!. r t y p e r c en t ( 3 0 ~i,) of l. h c s tu d y a re .:-1 cons i s ts of o 1 d e: r z. l l u '.' i a l depos_it~ of se1:1iconsoliC::~t~d silt> clay, sand and gra_vel ·,:hi.ch hc-1vc .o. r.1ediui.t infiltra- tion rate of or.c inch (l") Lo two 'inches (2 11 ) per hour. The rcil12indc:-of the area, 2ppro:d:.!2tcly sixty-five percent (65°/,,) consists of c.onsoJ idatcd s2nclsto.nc, she.le: c.nd _s il ts to :1 c • Th is so i 1 t y pc c xJ-1 i b i ts . v c r y poor i 11 f U tr~ ti o ~1 · ch '1 r a c t c ri s ~ i cs., 1 c .s s th<.:: n -one inch (l") per hour. (Sec Pl.ate I, Soil J.nf:5.lt.r0tion Ch~ractcristics) · Soils 5.n ".·:hich the infil t·ra U.on ra tc i.s less tltan t\-10 inc1:cs (2°) fn one hour arc '-1nsuitablc for sc22.:-!zc pits and rates slo~:cr Lh:n1 o:-ic inch (l") per hour a:-c unsuit- ~blc for 2:-iy typt! of soil aLsorptio11 sc·a2;c cffJuc:1t dis~>os~t1 systc::i. There.fo:-e:, ~ :r .ea s ex hi bi ting the a£ o l." c ~en Lio :1 e d in£ i 1 tr c:.: ti o 11 ch~ r 2. c t cl. j s t i c.s sh o u 1 d no t b (; c e: v do p (· . ~nlpss suitable al~crnatc disposal f~ciliti~s are available. . . .. Dct.cilcd inforr.12t.ion on g:-ouncl water chai2.cterist5cs in the area was not rec.dily ~va.il­ able during the period th2.t the survey 1 .. ·.:~s c.01:chtctcd. lt was cstc:iblished that :::::>st pf lhc w~ter wells are sh2llow water table wells. The drilled cle9t~s of the ~ells . J"angc bct'.:c~-;1 fifty feet (50') to one hundrc"d ft.·~~ (100' ). Aionz. }!andy C-r(;C:~ ~.::.:.:-the ~outhcrn boundry of the area, the static water level is a?proxi~2tcly thirty feet (30 1 ). :A.lo_'i"lZ SantiaEo Creek the static water level is ~tpp:-oxir.iatdy sixt}' f.cet (60 1 ). -. -· F1"eld Surv:->y Oi.~ Ex1°st1"no., I d" "d l s n· , s .. _ '=' n i v i • u a c \·.'a ?.. c. i .s n o s a .... • 'L. s ~ c;~~ . 1...-house to hous2 survey was conducted and ho:-:'.cowaers r,.:ere in t'crviewed. to gather ca ~<1 on the history of s C\·:age disposa 1 sys ter.i £ail u res and rl:c-:kc obscr·;a tions f o:-€V ic~:1CQ of any fa~lty systems. A systc~ failure i~ defined a5 the inability of the dis?csal f;:s te:n · to function prope rry ~·:i thou t cloggbg and the re s\d. tan t over flo1:i:lg co~d i ~io;is. One hundr~d-a.nd fortv-thr-2e (i43) of the aoo:·oxic:t.3telv th::-ee··hur1dred (300) ho!l.eo· .. -.~ers . -. .. .. .' . in the area were intervie·.:cd. _All of the homes \-:ere visited but over half of t~c residents ~ere not at home. T~e data below represents the results obtai;ed free th~ intervi~ws conducted ~u:-:~~ the survey a~d Health Departmcn~ records: :-. -• .. --.... -. . 1 F t ( 4?) t t . .. (? <"'' ) ... t• • ... • 1 ---· • orty-~ .. ;o ·-per.sons, or wen y-n1ne p~rce;-t~ -'Jf,, or. nose 2n1..~rv:L.e~,·~c.,, adraittcd to at le?..st one pt;r.:pir:;; since L~1ci:: c!L;~w:-;,:d. syste~ l.".:!S :.nst3l~cc!. ·· -· Ho~ever, when p~esscd they ~2re vague r~z2rd!ng the ex2ct n~~~c~ of ti=~~ 'the systei"J. had been pUG?Cd and the tb:e la_?SC ~el-;·.''2Cil ?~::'.?in~s. 2. . Tu C n t y-th::"~ C ( 2 J )-p ~ ~ S 0 n S , 0 :-S i X ~: C ~ :1 [' (: l" C. \.~ :1 t. (16 c/J 0 f th 0 .5 C i:1 t ~ n· i C: ~,·::. C , rep o r t c d l c ~ c !1 5. :-i; s y.:; t c ::1 fa il I] :-e s \: i t. l : i ~'!.. ~: f i \'-: y c :i r .? c ~ i. o d . I:: fo :-2.:. t i ~ :;, ·was n?t givct_l d~:-ini; the intcn'ie:~·l.3 iudic,-..t.ir.z. the ·occurc::c~ of c:o.::-e t:-:.:.:: one failure. . . .. . . ... 34 A rc\•lc;,..• of i!c:dt:l! U.:.:ri~!l"l111·~·~1~ ':.it::.~:)iug recc>rcJ:; iw.lj(:;ttcs th.::ll of the .. approx.i::-~.'11 ··1:' 1-111-,-·c !1t1'1drt·cl ·,·,_::~~(·:. in th~ :irc.J fu;· L·y-o:-ic (t;l), thi:-:..:e:: • percent (1 )/:) of th-:· inc!.i.v.i<>.r..,l sc\,'.:'10C tH.:.>pos<tl :;y~t:eri1s, h2cl on-:_pu:.:;>;;-:z durin~ the YP•ir~; of 1970 auci .t971. · ~· Du ri n r. the f5 e fd in'-' cs U r, ~~ '· ~ ~.:: ! s evidenced by Ll1_e overflow i 11~» of t·.:.'.) syste:~:1 fa.Dure~; were SC:W<!Z,c effluent ir0:i1 the o:i:::;c:-·1cd) as lcachinz sys:c2~. . • .... .,,. .. ·:. ..... 5. Of \he approx5u.:1t.cly 300 hc::t(V,:;lcrs in Orange P~rk Acres, 157, or a~0ut fifly-sjx p<.!rcc;1L (56~' .. ) of Lhc: tolal, \·:ere not ~t ho::1.2 or u;i.Jvailc.ble: for .. : . -:--intcn·ic\-;J.u~~ d1n-inz. the survey. Durin~ the inycr.ric .. :.·;, the residents ~n g(·ncral \-:ere uncco~,cr2tivc ~-:~en • .. 1c attc::::?~~c to elicit info-:.·t:~~tioli. ~ho:_~t: their se·.:<'.C dj~posaJ. systc~s. The:re ·w~s a pcrvasi·:e; f 1 • o :"'"' · ~ ..., r '"' " · d · •· t· , ' · 'r · ..., t '" h -. -" · " ' · " 1 1 '."\ "") ] ,. t : ..,. ..... · ._ · : .. .. i.. ri C : .. · ~ ec l.nv _?. ... :> .. ~ t...:~•l. <. .i -S L. .... t...i C. Sllr, C_, ,·,O~. U c.CCL: .C. a C .L.H(.0. ?O .. ..t .... 1.Ci1 ... :11..0 1..i·_ ;.... .. ./ of Orange, rcsu!.Lin~~ ir1 zo~1c: chm1zr.~> Y_.;;d.ch ~.wuld destroy Lhe p:-escnt rur-al at:.-.;:s?'l;.c:-e. lfany of the pc:rsoa.s i.ntcrvie\:cd \-;er'~ Lot;se\.~ivcs, v:ho in r.:o.:.;t. cases had little ~:1c::­ ledgC' .about their S£\·7:-.Ir/' disposal sy;:, Le;:~s. <·: . ··-. .. ·--. There \}2.S co~~r>l~tc ~:gr·e<.:::i(.'.ill,. c~I::onr. ~tlJ rJC!'SODS intc:rvin:~d, that ho:~cc·(:ncrs :-clicd cnti rely U?O;l cc~;spocd pt::~:rJ~rs to ;iV·".>5 J sci:~~2.c-ovcl·flv.·:~ · .. :i1cn p-ro!Jlc:-.:s arc fi :-st noted. Du:-inz1 the: ~-un·cy Lhcre ·~:ere '..iw Lc·:-:-:0s where sc-:.:<!zc \...'as obsc-::-v.::d O'l(;T flc.~:I::z froU\ ·the: le2d1inz. lines due. to a -~;ys~,;~~t fJilure. -_, Th . t f '"' -,~. t . ! .,. l ·1 -! "1 t· ~-.., d . b '.· L '·· ., • • l ..• c-[ .. , .. ? 'J l ..,... ... .... L • .,... •• -... -e fi10s rt.qut::,1 C(),;.L.1 <-·) ... u.lc.. c ) , t. rc~1cc111.., o. 1.nt.: ._J 10 ••• cs ~cpo ....... 1 •• z S.1:::>:...:.: .. i f "l 1 ':l ... ~ t tl)r• ,. ,,.-~,~ ., ·~) "t / r· th~ ;J ;<:: ,. r-v ,,",. • h !C• -~-.,... -... ,~-~;,..._, . al. t. res , \·L. s ... 13 " 1H .•. : . L D v _ . J ) o • .. t..: so ..... . .... ~· p 1J v.. > •••• 11 c ca u _, c .:> o • c ... s c::. ...... _ .:.. _ .;. ...i •• of. ·the 1 ca ch in z 1 in r: ~: ;;. ~ 1 d .seep ~1 ~ c-p i t. _, • In :-l c; d i U o :1 , th c y enc o u ::1 t C: red p :-o "::> l ~::: s ~d. : h their dis.posJ.l syst27";1;; nol. functionfng pro;)c:..rly due tor;~:.·.: water i11filtrat_io~ . .::..::-::--.f; thc·rc:iiny scas~ac ·· . -• • • ' I Cl:l<:r::ical a:1d b2ctc;ri(llo~j_c.J.l a:1a_ly~c~; of the ci~~;1t: (8) , ... .:-ile:r wells in the a-=:-e2 -,:~:-f.:! pcrfor•:1ed.in·a71 att,~:n{.)L ti)est31Jlis1~ \·:h.:·t effect, if any, t~e s~b-su:-fGcc ci.s?~.s2l of SC\·:2zc h?.s epon the quc::li ty of t.hr: undergr.o_end "..Ja tcr in t;1e area. The :-cs:..!l :s of the ~.r.alyscs arc pc;1ding;. therefore-) no dat;,_ is 2vaib~}(' at this ti;:-.-2. :--:.:,~ . .-;;;·;e:-, ~e wi~l continue to investigate this problcn and the fi~clin;~ ~ill be re?orted a: a later· date.·· - -· ·_·_ .-----~ ··· -·;. · • :_·~---·. ·. --· ... -~~ --"~ ~ ·-- ~ .... --. -. ... .. :... . ... ·.• . ·. -... --~ --·--· .... ·-, .· -· "-"" . . . .· .,, .. ~ -.. -.. -- ···o ___ ·:-. .. . - --. - _LEGEND Orange Park Co~·:n:.mi tv .i Boundary L in es High ) f n ilt.rat; .. ,. . . .. o .. Rate (Greater than ? 0 ·-• inch .-... ;· --~ no:Jr) , \' , . i..oec l u;.1 Infilt·· ... t· . . .. ,, ! oa Rate ( 1. 0 to 2. 0 Low· ,. · i n fj_ l t 1· , l . • . -,, J (1n R.:i t e: (Less t' ·.i:rn · 1. 0 inch(:,,;\. ..., .10ur) .. ~ I !- nall b e and L r~come delinquent for t y -five days aft e r ma iling or deliveri ng notice thereof to the ma iling address pf the property sub.)ect to suc!1 cl1a 1'ges . All de l inque nt charges shall be deeme d a violation of this ordinance and each day any such charge r em ains d e linque nt shal l be de emed a separ ate v iolation . ART I CLE 14 -PENALT I ES Any cha r ge that becomes d e linque nt shall h ave added to it a p enal ty charge equal to ten percent of the charge that became delinque n t and thereafte r an additional p enalty sha ll ac crue on t h e .total charge due , including the ten pe r cent basic penalty at the r ate of one -hal f of one p e rcent p er month un ti l paid . ART I CLE 15 -COLLECTION Upon motion by the Board of Directo rs of the charge a nd a ll penalti es thereo n shall be collected by l a wsuit the nam e of the District . Any su ch action for co l l ecti o n may incl ude an app lication for an inj unct io n to . pre vent r epeated and r eocc ur ring vio l ations of this ordinance . ARTICLE 16 -VIOL..l\TIO NS No p erso n o r public c orporation shal l vio l ate any provisions or f a il to comply with any of the r e q uirement s of this ordine..n c e . Any p erso n or public corpo rat ion violating any of the provisi ons o r failing t o comply with any of the requi r e ments of this o rdinanc e shall be gui l ty of a mi sdemeano r . An y p e rs on or corp orati on con- vic ted of a misdemeanor unde r the provisions of this ordinance i ll be punished by a f i ne of no t more t han $100 .00 o r by i mp r ison- ment i n the County Jail f or a peri od not exc ee d i n g thirty d ays , or b y both such fine and i mp ris onment . Each p e r son or p ub li c corporation s h a ll be guilty of a separate o f f e11se f oi:· each and every day d.Llri ng any por t i on of wh i ch any violation of any prov i s ion of this o rdinanc e i s c ommitted, c ontinued or permi ttc d by suc h person 0 1 · pub l ic c orp o r ati on a.nd :·h'.1.11 be p unishable acc o rdin8 1 Y. June 14, 1 972 (5) Assemb l y Bill 2146 -hold down and limit fees of direc t ors to one dis t r i ct ins t ead of all. Representatives interested in item -Rhoda Martin -copies of bil l . Bill has been revised and is being recommended for approv al . Amend building committee : 5 men commi t tee -Norman Culver, Cl ifton Miller -Chuck Stevens, Alicita Lewis to replace . 1969 the flood came very close t o breaking the wall . Appo i nt a committee to look into the problem: Caspers , Coen, Porter, Davis Executive committee -5 :30 Tuesday , June 27 -Also attend Stevens, Store, Duke Di fficul t y between state and federal agencies and getting the plans approved -Berch and Carpent e r r ecommending grant program . (6) Ins t ead of the managers report, we are going to report on t he situation of the federal water pollution control . In talking with t he representat i ve back in Wash i ngton , the water po l lution control b i l l is still in the conference committee . The one parti cul ar area -blanket secondary t reatment . Our reques t still has a. fighting chance . Can we make it bett er than a fighting chance? As far as the State Water Resources Control Board for adoption of it and tes timony of the 3 hearings . Professor Middlebar has been revewing the document and will make a recommendation to the state board . Scheduled for on t he 6th of July -will come ou t wi th thei r policy . Directors fees: the bill is i n the Senate committee . Have not fou nd out if they wil l be through . (7) No special report (9a) Harvey Hunt -Come up with something to sati sfy the State Water Control Board July 6 . ®:mncXMKfilc x±.Rm Come up with t heir f i nal requ i rements . The 2 b i lls being comsidered are in comm i ttee st ill. Both t alk about a ll dischar ges h a veing t he best practicable t reatment in 1 976 and best highest in 1 981 . Best p l an the least cost to t ax payers . Plan 1 -put in secon dar y facilities at t his Plant 1. 46 mgd -1/3 of flow today -this would give you a water easy t o move through the t r eatment . Blend the high degree of treatment at Plant 1 add no r mal Pl ant 2 and --come close to meeting the requirements . Blend high at p l ant one wi t h pri mary at p l ant 2 . The s t ate fee l s this is a wo r kab le p l an at plant 1. Will come back to the board next year wi th more . Blend both plants to meet stat e requirements and yet keep the cost down to hel p tax payers . P l an i s g i ven app r ov al . This plan is recommended . May 1 st deadl ine for receipt of plans for approv al in 1972-73. Anticipated start, middle of July . Submit a project report made in August . April 30 comp l ete plans and specs . i n order to meet schedule to fund in 1 972 -73. Then come back and make time schedule . Mr . Harper -we are on the state grant pro j ect .. list for this com i ng year for $19 million for cons t ruc t ion . Mot i on for approval; carri ed . 2 Baker -call from National Association of Counties -Tuesday, June 20th -HR 14370 will be heard in committee session . $16 million annually for the next 5 years to the County of Orange . The purpose is to alert the cities that this bill will be heard . Needs 3 more votes for no amendments under the closed rule . This request is to alert the cities of Orange County -34th District is still uncommitted . Orange to communicate to Hanna if in support •of this bill. (11 ) Norman Culver nominated for Joint Chairman Robert Finnell · Nominated for Vice Chairman -Jesse Davis (39) Request of City of Orange . A study be i ng conducted for development in the area . There are 4 alignments: blue - Handy Creek alignment to Amapodle alignment . Green goes to Santiago . Yellow through Santiago to Orarg e Park. Cost: Route 4 -$250,000 -best on the cost estimates . Master plan route. The green or #1 -comparable, around $250,000 about the same . Others $300,000 -$315,000 & $390,000 . Recommended that the Green alignment be considered as an alternate alignment from the master plan. The staff has met with the Planning Department, Road Department City staff, home owners . Perhaps alternate may not prove to be the moset desirable due to the green belt coordination and equestrian trails . Thi s will implement a need for the areas that are asking annexation to the districts. Questions : Could you define the committee issues? Basic consideration in this portion of Handy Creek is the right of way. Green areas . To clear the area would be a long and lengthy task at this time. Green belt would be less detrimental to the area . Green is recommended as an alternate route . Can be done with minimum of difficulty with right of way . Flood control? Coordinate with flood control to save tax dollars? They have plans in the area and do not anticipate county funds for the improvements within 20 -25 years . The Handy Creek area will need a local sewer in this area . Should you have an environmental impact study in this are for Handy Creek . Has an environmental impact study been done? Not yet. '.filKXgx Is there going to be federal money going into this route? No federal money . The staff report is in answer to the City of Orange . Request for consideration of reimbursement for alternate alignment . Chairman of Orange Park Acres Planning Committee -wish to point out that we in the committee have looked i nto Handy Creek . Economically it would be the best way to go = green belt and equestrian trails. Feel should expedite flood control plan. Feel a little more study should be required as tothe cost, maybe 30 -90 days . Feel bot.h should be done together to save money . Feel a closer coordination betwemflood control and sewer line . Should look for the least cost to the citizens. Carl Nelson, 20 -25 year delay for flood control in that area . Statement was that if this was to be built by flood control, it has such a low priority that it would not be constructed before 20 -25 years . Sewers still need to be constructed for area . The entire area is out of the area at the present time. Move approve engineers recommendation for master plan. Second and carried \ \ \ J -. (47) 1{'~ Agenda item meeting June 27th to discuss d e legation o f of authority to approve change orders. Moved, seconded & carried. (49) Special committee for annexation -annexation f ee change 3 connection fee charge . Study based on the future needs of the districts. Going to be another meeting the 29th . We have the annexation connection charges for deferment by Anahe im Hills. Should have recommendation by next board meeting . (50) When this property is passed over to t he buye r s i s it c l ear that they are picking up the bills. x:fx~ Mu st be secur e d . Does not go on the tax rolls. It is up to t h em to p ropos e wh at kind of a contract to insure payment. Jim Bu risic -impression was that the 5 year instal lment wou l d be assessed lower -5 or 6% interest charge . If the board agrees to the 6% charge -750 units per year -high estimate. Rate of development lower . 400 or 500, maybe 200 acres developed. (5 4) • ~..;- june 14, 1972 Cha i r man pro te1r1 a ppoin ted f or Distric t l -Wade Herri~ Chairma n p ro ce m appointed for Dist r ic t 11 -Hen ry Du!\:e #5 -Re port o f Jo i n t Cha irman Assembly Bi ll ~1 46 was introduc ed by Townsend. Jo~ld ena ble any Di strict t o ho l d d ow n fe es for Dir e cto rs to one Distric t Dir ectorship. Building Co mmi tte e madP. up of Joint Cha irmal'"l and four other rr,e mbers : Ju s t, Cu l v e r, Mi ller, and a sked Chuck Stevens and Alicita Le wis to c omp l et e t h e c ommi ttee . Appo i n t ed c omm it~ee t o look i nt o s i tuati on o n f lood control : Cas pers , Coe n , Porter, Da vi s , and Just . Announ c ed meet ing of Executive Comm i ttee on Tuesday, J une 27 t h a t 5 :30 and invited D!rectors J o h n Stor e , He nry Du k e a nd Ch ~~le s STe vens to at t end . Re stat e a nd fed era l agen c y grant appr ova l pro gram , s ~nator Ca rp ent er sent a l e t t er but s till do n t h ave. #6 -Re port of Gene r a l Man a g er Re s tat u s of Fed er a l Wa t e r Po llu tion Co n trol Bi ll and Water Qua l i t y Plan for Oc ean Waters o f California, rep r esentatives in Washington i nd i catej yest erday t h a t Bi l l is s t il l in c onference committee. One part icu lar are a o f the Bill is t he blank e t s eco ndar y tre atment requ irement . Sa i d our re que s t stil l h a s a f i ght i n g c hance . Th o u ght everyth i ng we c ould d o ha3 be e n done. SW RCB ado p tion o f o ce a n po l icy -Ha v e turned over a ll tes t imony o f the thr ee hearin g s t o p r o f essor at Un i versity c f Utah. Vil l mak e r e por t a nd r ec omm e nc.!ati o n to St a te Boa r d in the n ex t f ew days ei.ncl the y a r e go i ng to have a wo r kshop s ess i on -c lo sed session of Sta~e Boar d and t heir st af f . Ar e sch eduled to come o u t wi t h o cean policy on Jul y 6th . Re Bi ll conc e r n i n g Dir e ctors ' f ees, wa s h e ard yest er d~y (6/13) i n t he Se na te Local Gove r n men t Comm i t t ee and h aven't f ound out j_f it go t t h r ough . Ho p e t o g et i t on the c o ns 2nt cal end a r. #7 -Rep o r t of Genera l Co~nse l (N o s pecial report) #9 (a) -Ha r vey .:-ru n t r epo r ted they a re attempting to d~velop a pi"ogr am or p lan to ~~ttRz d e v eloo bet t e r t reatment tc meet reoui rements of fe de ra l g overnment , s tate , and own community. Are ~r ;) .. L1g to protect cit izens o f t h e count y and deve lop somethlng that 1'.'ilJ. sc.t:is f y SWRQ CB and meet fed er al r equ irem e nts . Schedul e for b es t p~ac~icab le treatme nt ~s fo r 1 97E; a n d bes t obtai nab l ~ treatment is for 19 8J \Tha t i s highest '-degr e e of t 1°ea-cr.ient that i s @~x:a possible toC.ay), Har·~. ma:-·ir:tur; c;re2t!TI<:::--,.t f o r the l ea s t cos 'c to the t axpaye rs . 'r111.s pr·og:ram "f.: t2 .lffto these ~e q uire m ent s . F i~s t st ep of thi s plan would be to put ~n se con d a~y p . 2 tr::atment at Plant.. 1 'or• 46 milJ j_on gallons per day -app roximate l y 1/3 of fl ow today. Ttlif,, .rnuld give .·n~ ter that i s easy to re claim or r euse . Would give high l<!Vel 0f treatment at Plant 1 and when blended with primar y treat8d. water from r1ant Z flows, could come very close to State di sc h ar·g e req uir (:!mcnts. Would be a little h i gh on solids criteria and t hree of the heavy ~e ta ls . State likes the plan and rea lizes first step woul dn 't exactl~ wee t require~ents. Next year will sh o ~ wh at s hould be d one at Plant 2. Itarvey Hunt met wi th State on May 17 a nd June 5 and all gav e ve r bal approva ·i of this plan. In order .to activate th is recommended progr am and me et dates set forth, date set for rec e ipt o f p l ans for approval is May 1, 1973. WiJl s u bm i t projec t report to state i n Au gust . Wi ll hav e p l a n s a n d sp ecs completed April 30 to meet May 1 deadline . FAH me ntioned that we are on the state grant p r oj ec t list f o r $19 mil l i on f or c onstructi on It wa s moved & sec onded that staf f & e n g ineers be directed to pro cee d wi th this pro j ect report. Mo tion carr ied . #9 (c) -Finnell as k ed why the three lab positions indic ated f or las t year's r equireme nts we~e mov ed off a nother year. Ted Dun n stated t hat they a lways budget for t h e max imum they believe the y wi ll ne ed a nd if not ne ede d , consider ro r the next ye ar's budget . . Supervisor Ba ker niad<· a special anno uncement here : Sa i d h e re c eived a cal l from Nat i onal Asso ciat ion of Countie s t ha t on Tuesday} June 20th Bi ll HR 14370 wi ll be heard in Commi ttee . This bi ll ·· ordered by Le ague of Ci.t ie s a nd p rovides $16 mi lli on an nually for next five yea r s for County of Or ange and $12 .6 million annua lly for cit i es in County of Orange. Purpo se of thi s urgen c y is that this Bi l l will be h e a r d and ne e d s about thr ee mo re v ote s to evoke closed-ruie act i o n i n whi ch n o amendm ents could be made with their questions t o the floor . Mr . Baker was t o a lert as many o f th e c itie s as possible of th is pend ing a ction and advi se that one of the vo te s ne c es s ary is from th e 34 th District . Said that i f you su pport reve nue building concept, communicate this to Co n g re ss - man Ha n na as soon <lS p oss ibl e . After EXE CUTI VE SESSION, Jac k Green moved & it was sec onde d that t h e sal a r y of the Geucral Manager, effect ive July 1, b e ra ised to $30 ,000/y ear and t h e salary of -t :he Ass ist ant Ge n e r a l Manager be raised to $26 , 250 /year. Moti on c a rried by unanimous acclamat i on . Mr . Just men tioned that t h e Boar ds ap pre c iated their e fforts and intere st express e d l a s t De cember whe n they f orwen t a ra i se and th e o nly thought of the Directors n ow was how much o f a n i n c rease to sive them , not if an increase should be made. #9(h ) -Comm it tee was appointed t o review compe nsatio n of Distr i cts ' De p a rtment Heads: Donal d Winn, Chairman , Vand erwaal, Bak e r, Sto r e a nd Cu J::v er. #11 -Culv er said t hat he a ppr eciat ed p l a qu e for s erv ing as Joi nt Cha irman a nd Vice Joiut Chairman and then nom :i,na ted Robert Finnell fo r Jo int Chairma r. f'crrii seconded mo tlcn . Motion wa:::, made that nominations be clo seu, secc 1dcd ar ' r-arr ied. Nomina'c ions f or· V·ic:r:: .icint Cha 11·man we re ope ned and Jesse Da vi s was nomina ted & ffi(. t .l.CJr1 1Jc r~onded . f'.1r_,tir..1n ·w as ma.de that n<;minatlon s be closed , s econ ded a nd c~rri~d . p . 3 Smi t h mentioned that It~m 5h shoul d be brougl tto the att ent i o n of t h e Directors before any of the Distri cts a dj ourned. Thought part of the name should be eli ~ina t ed , either River side Freeway or th e Robert F . · F i nnel l Rjve r Cros~inB, anrl preferred leaving n0w l y name d crossing in . There was some di scussion on a d ed icat io n ceremony or par ty to be sponsor ed by t he person f or wh ich the cross ing wa s named . #3 8 -Miller asked if tllls item could be co ns~der ed at a me eting before t h e Ex ecutive ~~K~~~* Committe e meeting. (An ne xat ion of Tra c t 6232). An adjo urned meet ing was set fo r 5 :DO p .m. o n the 27th of June. #3 9 -Ray Lew is showed propos ed r ealignment of ma st e r p l a n sewe r to s erve Orange Park Acres a rea to be conside r ed for reimbursement trunk sewe r s ometime i n t he future . City could b uil d to Districts ' requ ireme nts to s erve a portion of the City o f Orange. Commun ity plan was developed by a d h oc comm itte e. Staff wor ked c losely with Co u nty of Orange and other staff of Plannin g Department, con s ulting engineer staf f, and Di st r icts ' staff a nd made stud"les of four al i gnme nts: #1 fo llows Handy Creek alignme nt; #2 goes to Sanitago Canyon Blvd. and Orange Park Blvd. (as shown i n Ma ster Pl an ); #3 fol lows San tiago Canyon down t o Orange Park Blvd and o u t Fr anklin(?) Stree t ; #4 Rbo ut same as #3 wi t h a little variation . . #4 = Mast er Plan alignment -cost wo uld be a r ound $250 ,00 0 #1 = com parable alignment -co s t ar o u nd $255 ,000 Othe r t wo alignments are $31 5,00 0 a n d $390 ,000 It is the s taff's recommenda ti on t hat the gre en a li gnment (#1) b e considered as an alt ernate ali gnment from the master plan a lignment and if City designs and constructs t o paramet e rs of Districts, co uld be considered as a re - imbur sement sewer sometime in the f uture. Have me t with Planning Department, Road Dep art me n t , Orang8 Par k Ac res Home Owner s Assoc i at ion } other pr o per ty owner s and City 's s taf f and have kept everybody adv ised of p rogress and studies . Alter nate aljtnment may not be alignment mos t of the people wante d b ecause of Greenbelt Plan. Will basical ly meet requirements of District s and p e opl e. Mi ll er asked t hat d~ffPre nces in alignments be explained. Ray s t at ed tl1at the basic consi deration i s r ight of way -wou l d be a long and l e ngthy task at thi& t ime. Gr een a li gnment (#1 ) wou ld fo l low right of way u ntil i t a ssumes Hanc.Jy Creek al ignment. Cl ark as ked if F lo od Co nt ro l didn 't have similar p lan s and shoul dn 't our efforts be coord inated . . Ra y said t h at F lood Control d id have p lans but wa·s a very low p r iority proje ct a n d did not anticip ate fund s f or a n othe r 20 -25 ye ars . Smit h st ated that Green ~ou te plan r eaches up t o Orange Unified School Di s t ri c ts s ites . Ther e wi l l bE ne ed for loca l sewers l a ter and at that time could be coordinated vri th any improvement s i n the Hand y Creek area . Ga sper s asked if there ~hou ld n 't be an EI S on this project. Smi th c ommen ted that if .vo u put a sewe r i n the stre et, you don 1 t have to haYe an impact statement. Stre et is a lr e a dy t~er e . Bu t if i t is requi red , S i ty of Orange will do J.t • .._Ju st s aid th·i s would be fin alternate to Master Plan, so wo uld be an and/or s i tuat ion. F AH: I f Djst1 1cts approve this , wo ul d be the reimbursable alignment. The o th ers wnuld not be. p. 4 L?we l l Kving~, Chairman o f Orange Park Acres Pla nning Committee , i nt r oduc e d h i mself . Said present Mas t er P l an (Co min g up Hand y Cr e e k ) looked feasible . Re F l ood Cont~o l Project of Greenbelt Plan and f lood cont rol c hanne l a long Handy Cree k , 1·:3.s under the impres sion that this wo u ..Ld b e within next year or so and was very d isappoint ed t o h ear that th i s l ook s l i ke 20 ~25 years . Shoul d try to e x ped ite Flood Control plan f o r hor se trai ls, bike tra ils, etc. Would be very desirabl e fo r Cit y of Orange . He f elt t he re sh ould be more stu d y . If Greenbelt Plan is 20 -25 years downstre aR, s h ould l ook at alternat e r oute s , and should lo ok for the le ast cost t o . citizens. Ra y s a i d Carl Ne lson of F lood Control was th e one who said thi s _ was 20 -25 years away . Othe r ar e as wil l have to be u sed, whether local sewers or trunk s ewe rs . We a r e just responding to a request of the City of Orange . Sm i th ma de a motion t o approve eng ine er's recommendation for mod ification of a li gnment in Ma ster Plan trunk and if faci l ities ar e bui l t to the specific ations , they will qua l ify for reimb ur sement . Mot ion seconded and carried . Clark mo v e d that the staff_ pursue the recommenda tion tha t Mr . Kvinge made to see if there is some coordinatio n with the Flood Control peop l e that c oul d be accompli shed and $ee about raisi ng the p riority of this project . Als o men tioned Flood Control zoning sho u l d be chec ked out . Motion wa s sec onded and carr i ed . #47 -Anot h er i tem to be consider e d at District 7 adjourned mee t i ng on the 27t h is the delegation of author it y f rom Board to General Manager to approv e Change Orders . Motion re this was made by Mil ler , seconded and carri ed . #4 9 -Re Sp e c i al Comm i ttee f o r S tudying Annexa t .ion and Connection Fee Policy, Sm ith stated that the y have n't come to a co nclu sio n as yet . Recommendati on i s that annex at ion f ee s change, either up o r down , with connection fee charge. Stud i es a r e be i ng b ase d on futu r e need s of Di s tri ct for facili t i es and for unanne x ed areas of ·Di stric t 2 . Hav e had several meeting s . Go i ng to have another meeting on the 2 9t h and ho pe to come to some t y pe of r e c ommendat i on . Re deferrment of payment o f annexation fees on Ana h eim Hills annexation , should study this and make some suggestion . Shbuld h a ve a re por t by n ext meeting. #50 -Speci a l Committ ee d i s c ussed this and if deferre d , should be subject to intere st c h arges. Just h ad one q u e stion -wh e n this p r o p e r t y passes over to b u ye r, does buyer c l earl y und erstand that the y ar e pi ck j_ng up five-ye a r char ges o r whateve r is l e ft o f c harges ? I s it spel led out 011 l egal d ocument s? Ni ss o n an swere d that i f Board appr o,red~ would have to have written docume nt and s ecurit y in some manne r . Do e s not go on tax roll. Wi th Nohl annexation , took securit i e s and inne xat ion is st i ll pending. Shoui d be giving notes on 1 s t and 15th . Is up t o them to propos e what kind o f a con tract t he y h ave t o ins ure pay ment to t he Distric t . Don 't like to tak e se curities as they have to keep te i n g evaluated . Jim Ba r i sic of Anah eim Hills ind icat e d t h2t h e didn't k new any th i ng about not be ing able to make fiv e -year i ns tal lment payments o n t ax bill . Ca sper s asked why we were d oing t he builders a favor. Finnell re plied that wh eth e r or not t he y c ome in p i e ceme al ~ we will accrue t axes f or entir e f i v e y ears . If Bo ard agrees to 6% char g e, that wo uld of fset the los s sowewhat tha t we might have in n ot get ting i t all at once . p . 5 Caspers asked if any of thi s is an a61Jcultural preserve and was ans we red that no portion was except that in go l f course (approx. 5 ac res) Smit~ cor.l!lented that getting ~he Laxes a nd in~erest would be quite a s um . Motion was made to approve five year installments with 6% interest subject to approval of an agr eement to be drafted. Motion wa s sec onded and carried . #52 ~-Finnell ~sk ed that it be made a matter of record that he mo ved that the p r oposal submitted by Lowry & As sociat es be received , filed and accepted . ~L Ca spers asked if Terry & Asso ciates was competitive and if they were in line with other c o mpanies . FAH said they took competitive b i ds on environmenta l impact statement s from fi ve different compan ies and Terry was quite l o,v . Are very p l eased with his work but would k eep a c heck on his p r ices . Caspe rs stated that we should keep a check on these prices .· ... EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, OF O;RANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., June 14 , 19 72 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary r~~orteg a quorum present for each District's Board. * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 6 Adjournment Moved, seconded and. duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to June 21, 1972, at 4:30 p.rn. at Newport Beach City Hall. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:39 p.m., June 14, 1972. STATE OF CALIFORNIA~ SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11~ of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and.correct copy of minute entries on m~eting of said Boards of Directors on the 14th day of June 19 72 ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 14th day of June, 1972. S-107 Nos. EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, OF O]:\ANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., June 14, , 19 72 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reporte~ a quorum present for each District's Board. * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded an~ duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to June 29, 1972, at 5:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting SD adjourned at 9:17 p.m., June 14, 1972. STATE OF CALIFORNIA~ SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and.correct copy of minute entries on m~eting of said Boards of Directors on the 14th day of June 19 72 ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 14th day of June, 1972. 2, 3, S-107 Nos. EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, ~as held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., June 14 , 19 72 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District's Board. * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 5 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of· Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to June 21, 1972, at 4:30 p.m. at Newport Beach City Hall. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:39 p.m., June 14, 1972. STATE OF CALIFORNIA~ SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of· each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and.correct copy of minute entries on m~eting of said Boards of Directors on the 14th day of June 19 72 , IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto -set my hand this 14th day of June, 1972. S-107 the Boards of Directors nitation Districts Nos. 6, 7, ~nd 11 EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, Was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., June 14 , 19 72 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District's Board. * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 7 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board or Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to June 27, 1972, at 5:00 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:03 p.m., June 14, 1972. STATE OF CALIFORNIA~ SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretar'y of-each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and.correct copy of minute entries on m~eting of said Boards of Directors on the 14th day of June 19 72 ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 14th d~y of June, 1972. S-107 he Boards of Directors itation Districts Nos. 6, 7, ~nd 11