HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972-05-10COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
May 5, 1972
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11
Gentlemen:
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of
County Sanitation Distrj_cts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11,
of Orange County, California, will be held:
Wednesday evening, May 10, 1972
at 7:30 p.m~
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
· 71creta~
Tentative adjournments prior to next regular meeting:
Executive Co~.mittee
District No. 2
Distri.ct No. 5
5:30 p.m.~ May 3C
5 30 n" 2L'I : p • m • , 1~J..ay t
4:30 p.m., May 25 at
Newport Beach City Hall
SEE ATTACHED MAPS OF DETOUR rJECESSARY TO ENTER PLPJ'ff NO. 1
. ' . '
I
f UC LI D _ _,,.
'O'i,
. '
I
/.
Mb.INJ TRANCt -~ .. . .... : S,. · . . ~ ON(~~~~~ . 0 I '~~< ·. : . ~i\lf4 :.--·.·. ~.' ~-""-( •
CONTl<Dl. ~· ·. · 4A, .. ·. · .. · '""-" I I I CfNTfR . ~ : .... · ·v..q ~ · .. · _.. · .' ·~
. 0 ~ _Jl \\~oo <>~ o oY ~, -/~~~ ..... -.-. ._. :-' .. '..
~r~ » , . .
Ff-NCt' Al\I
~.~:!~. . O· o,-·-·-..) -r---. -00600 .OOo.o<looooae,~"if\')t ~. a "°"'"'~ ::.~ . . O.et.NO;t~ ~\4~~e"5 " 0 l
T
AD"1LN1'5TgcmoN 1-tNlNO r<t:JADNA.Y
E)L>lL.DlN6 I
L.Ae>~AT 01<-Y ·
tlll~ AVE
--~,~~-~~--~-·,·~===~~
PLANT N~ 1
N01' iO SC£\le-
Co ~nty S a :.l ~aHon D istrids
of O rang~ County, Ca liforn i.:i
BOARDS
P. 0. Box d 12 7
108-44 El lis Aver.cc
Founta in V1J iley, C;;l if., 92708
-========== =============-===========·---------
M~y 10, 1972 -7:30 p .m .
(1) Pledge o f All egiance and Invocation
(2 ) Ro ll Ca l l
FI LE --····----·"'"
AGENDA
ADJOURNMENTS POSTED .. .V
COMP & M\LEAGE .... ~-
F\LES SET UP ...... ~····.
RESOLUTIONS CERT\FIED.V"°
LETTERS WRITIEN ... ~·
MINUTES WRITTEN .... ~
MINUTES l-ILED ..... ~
LETTER .............. ( 3 ) Consider ation of mo ti on to recei v e and file minute
excer p ts fro m the various c ities and the County of
Oran ge r egarding elect ion s of mayors a nd appointments of
a l ternat e s, and seating ~ew members of t he Boards
A/C •••. TKLR •••• \
-··-·········""""ff\ s
(4) L'I.STRIC'T J.
Annual election of Chairman of the Boa rd
(5) DISTRICT 2
Annual election of Chairman of t he Board
( ·' \ 0 / DISTRICT 3
Annual election of Ch ai r ma n of the Board
(7) D ISrJ:IRIC'l' 5
Annual elec tion of Chai r man of the Board
(8) DIS'T-RIC'r 6
Annual election of Chairman o f t he Board
(9 ) DISTRICT 7
Annual election cf Chai r man of the Board
(1 0) DISTRICT 11
Annual elec tion of Cha i rman of t he Board
(11) App oin t ment of Ch airmen pr o tern, if nec e ssary
(12) EACH DISTRICT
-Cons i-dera·~ i o·n of motions approv:ing mi n utes of the
fo l l owing meet i ngs, as mai l r:;d :
tV\/s District 1 April 1 2 , 1972 regular
~}--D i strict 2 April 12 , 1 9 ~(2 regul9.r and . .::. April 27 , :!.972 adjourr.ed
MJs Distr i ct 3 Apr·il 1 2, 1972 spee:i.a l ,
April 12, 1 972 r egul a r and
April 2 7, 19 7 2 special
/Yl/s Di strict 5 April 1 2 ;. 1 97 2 regular
/YI 1~ Distriet 6 April l '7
J.. I ' 1972 a djourne d
M/.s District 7 April 1 2 , 1 9 72 ad j o·.1rned ·and
April 12, 1 972 re g u~ar
('llf S Distr·ict 11 April 1 ? 1 9 72 regul ar and ---' Apri1 27~ J 9 72 spec ial
~
FILE ···-··-·-·-~
(16)
F1LE ••••••••••••••••••
LETIER ·····-Mi~
A/C •••• TKLR ••••
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Joint Chairman ~. ~~.
~':It \'" .;.o
ALL DISTRICTS
G~'a ~ .. '.~
Report of the General Manager
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to adopt resolutions expressing
appreciation for the services of the following retiring
active Directors:
John Berton
Jerry Christie
Robert Clark
Alvin Coen
John Harper
Robert Harvey
Dexter Hemeon
Edgar Hirth
Joseph Hyde
Donald Shipley
Hal Sims
ALL DISTRICTS
District No. 3
Districts Nos. 2 & 3
Districts Nos. 2 & 3
District No. 11
District No. 3
District No. 3
District No. 3
District No. 5
District No. 3
District No. 11
Districts Nos. 2 & 3
* * * * * * *
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters placed upon the consent calendar
are considered as not requiring discussion or
further explanation and unless any particular
item is requested to be removed from the consent
calendar by a Director, staff member, or member
of the public in attendance, there will be no
separate discussion of these items. All items
on the consent calendar will be enacted by one
action approving all motions, and casting a
unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the
consent calendar. All items removed from the
consent calendar shall be considered separately
in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an
item from the consent calendar shall, upon
recognition by the chair, state their name,
address and designate by letter the item to
be removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be
deleted from the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda
items appearing on. th~ consent calendar not
specifically removed from same.
-2-
FILE ················••(a)
lETrER ···-······-
A/C __ TKLR -
FIL~ ···········-··{b)
LETTER ---·-
A/C _ •• TKLR ••••
...-.------··-
......--··-·-·······
FILE···-·-
LETTER -·-·-···-( C) we ___ rnR ....
FILE ........... Td)
LETTER··--
A/C •••• TKtR --
-·-~
FILr;P ........... ...._ ( e )
LETTER ••••••••••••••
A/C •••• TKlR _
(f)
FIL! ················~
LETTER ••••••••••••••
AIC .... TKLR ••••
---···-·············--........................ ..
F;LE ................ (g)
LEITER ••••••••••••••
A/C .... TKLR ··-
i=li"E·~~~=J2:'.
LEITER ·········Th)
A/C .... TKLR ·-·
(i)
f,LE ·······--
LETIER ···--
A/C •••• TKLR -
···-··-·-···-
···--·····-
Consideration of Resolution No. 72-71, approving
plans and specifications for Influent Metering &
Diversion Structure at Reclamation Plant No. 1,
Job No. I-8-3; and authorizing the General Manager
to establish bid date. See page "D"
Consideration of Resolution No. 72-72, approving
plans and specifications for Additional Secondary
Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-9-1,
and Water Reuse Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No .
J-4-1; and authorizing the General Manager to
establish bid date. See page "E"
Consideration of _Resolution No. 72-73, approving
plans and specifi~ations for Digesters N & 0 at
Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-21; and authorizing the
General Manager to establish bid date.· See page
Consideration of Resolution No. 72-7lt, approving
plans and specifications for Shops and Warehouse
Facilities, Job No. J-13; and authorizing the
General Manager to establish bid date. See page
Consideration of Resolution No. 72-75, ac~epting
Pump Station and Additions to Bypass Facilities
at Plant No. 1, Job No. I-7-3, as complete
"F"
"G"
and authqrizing execution of a Notice of Completion.
See page· "H"
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2~
to the plans and specifications to Remodel Sedimentation
Basins 3 & 4 at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-lR-1, and
~emodel Sedimentation Basins A, B & C at Plant No~ 2,
Job No. P2-1R-l, authorizing an additio~ of $377.00,
and granting an extension of time of 35 calendar days
to the contract with F. T. Ziebarth Company. See
page "I"
Consideration of Resolution No. 72-76, accepting
Remodeling of Sedimentation Basins 3 & ~ at Plant
No. 1, Job No. Pl-lR-1,arid Remodeling Sedimentation
Basins A, .B & C at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-1R-l,
as complete and authorizing execution of a Notice
q.f Completion. See page "J" ·--··--
Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to
the plans and specifications for the Power Reliability
Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-20. See page nK"
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3,
to the plans and specifications for Administration~
Engineering Building Addition, Job .No. J-7-2, and
·Vehicle Maintenance Facilities, Job No. J-12, authorizing
an addition of $7,891.36, and granting an extension of
time of 30 calendar days to the contract with B. H.
Miller Construction Company. See page "L"
(18) ALL DISTRICTS
·.~ ~-··········---
LETIER ·····-··-
A/C •••• TKLR ·-
--·-··-··-··---
-·-··········-······--
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of Special Committee on agreement with Orange County
Wat~r District to provide 15 mgd secondary treated water
for Water District reclamation facility and the right to
discharge a like amount of salt brin~s and other residual
material to Sanitation District facilities. See pages
(1cM}' v· and "N"~ ·
-·3-
(2o) ALL DISTRICTS
Consid eration of motion to accept proposal of Ric hard Terry & n lE~J····-e;/ Associ a t es, dated April 18 , 1972 , for preparation
, LEmR .\?.§._i\n }(_ of the 1972-73 En vironmental .Impact Statements for treatme nt
NC-~~R µI ~ plant improvements , for a maximum fee o f $8 ,500 . See
--··-··--page 11 0 11
~2 1)
::E: .. ~~-l·~··:M \ ~
--................. J
-:::B
LEITER •••.......•. ,.
A/C •••• TKl.R ••••
Fl lEv .... ~.{'2 3 )
LEITER ....... -... M
~~~ .. :.·.·---~-~~: ... ·fa l ~
(26)
ALL DISTRICTS
Consi deration of mo tion ·to -~and file l et ter from
Chairman of Orange County ~rd of Supervisors, dated
April 1 8 , 1972, in co n necti on with Santa Ana River -Sant i ago
Creek Greenbelt Plan, an d r e fer to Executive Committee v,-
See page 11 p 11
ALL DISTRICTS
H.eport of Commissione r Linsl e y Pa_rs ons , in connection
with proposed part ici pa tion in the Southern Cal i fornia
Coastal Wa ter Res earch Pro jec t by the State Water Resources
Control Board and the Federal Envir onmenta l Pro tec tion
Agency. See page· "Q 11
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of mot ion to r e ceive and file cer t ificat ion
of the General Ma n age r that he has c hecked all bi lls
appearing on the agend a , found them to be in order , and
tp at he rec ommends autho ri za tion for pa yment
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of rol l call vot e motion approving Joint
Operating and Ca p ital Out l ay Re volvi ng warrant books for
si gnature of the Ch airman of District No . 1, and a u thorizing
payment of claims listed on page "A"
ALL DISTRIC TS
Other bus i ness and communications, if any
DI STRICTS 3 & 11
Go 115 id er at ion of 1'1ffi"'tJ:i:-e-:n-a--17"f?-re·w-:h"rg-s-trs·p~e-f.ei.·R<:i-wa.~ropa-n '\; s=,
if any . 8ee-p-a-ge "B 11
(27) DISTR ICT 11
G-e··FTS~i'e-il?-6."'&-3:-&F~~-me-t4-&fl: a13p r ov in g warrant s , i: f-a:fl-Y-
(28) DISTRICT 11
(29)
11\\$
(30)
tllEt> ...... ~ ,\ \ S
LEnER .P .. 6. .. _ ~
NC .... TKLR N\ \ ~
(31)
Other business and communic a tions, i f any
DISTE ICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn ~" is1
DISTR I CTS 5 & 6
Consideration of motion t o receive and Sile letters from
Shuirman-Simpson, Districts 1 consult ing eng ineer
dated April 20, 1972, for addit i onal eng i neering services
in conn e ction with preparation of plans and specifi cations
for Coast Hi g hw ay For c e Ma in, Contra ct No . 5-1 9 ; and
approving inprease of b as ic fee for said se rvi ces f r om
$37,500. to $42,000. See pages "R" and 11 S 11
DISTRICTS 5 & 6
Con s i der ation of motion a pp roving suspense f und wa rr a nts,
if any. See page "B"
-4-
(32) DI STRICT 5
/.1111$ Consid e ration of motion approving warrants, if any .
Vfl ( See page "B"
(33) DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications, if any
( 34) DISTRICT 5
/'l\l~ Consideration of motion to adjourn ~· . .s.:s-
(3 5) DISTRICT 6
eonsider cttion of motion approving warr ants , i--f-a-B.y-.--
-&e-e-pa-ge II c II
(3 6) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications, if any
(37) DIST RICT 6
A'\.\~ Consideration of mo tion to adjourn 8 '. s:s
FI LEtt.V': ......... ( 38)
~:~E-~--;~~·~···:&.\ \ 5
-··-••••••-••u•ih.t
-·-··-············~""-®
0 1~~
FILEf). ..... ~-\5
LETIER ........... q
A/C ._.TKLR ... .
--·······-··········
_ ... _ .......... ..---··"·
(40)
~\~
DISTRIC'r 2
Consid erati on of motion approv i ng Addendum No. 3 , to
~he plans and specifications for th e Santa Ana River . 4 "T11 Interc ept or Sewer , Contrac t No . 2 -1 -1. See page
DIS'l'RI CT 2
Consideration of R ~solution No. 72-80 -2~pproving
requ est of California State College at Fullert on to
extend initial bi lling period from one year to 18 months
(January 1971 through June 1972), waivin g delinquency
charge for 1971; and providing· for subsequent billing
periods on a fiscal year basis .
See pages "U" and "V"
DisrrRICT 2
Consideration of motion approving warrants , if any.
See p age "B" ---
~ DISTRICT 2 ~ Other business and communications , if any
(4 2) DISTRICT 2
I' df J,~tion of motion to ~urn to May 24, 1972;::ilJ
lY/ / :> z:?7 ~ e
FllE U .. ~7
<lflliV_ ......... _ N\ j _s
A/C .... TKLR .. ..
DIS'rRIC'l1 3 ,__-
Consideration of ~esolution No . 72-77~3, authorizing
execution of Cons~lidation Agreement between_ County
Sanitation Districts Nos . 3 and 4, the City of Seal
Beach, and the Redevelopment Agency of ,the City of
Seal Beach , as prepared by the General Counse l.
See page 11 W" /and ~" ~ (Copy in meeti.ng folder)
( 4 4) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion approving warrants , if any.
See page "B"
~~ DISTRICT 3 ~\ Oth e r business and communications , if any
(46)
M [)
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn q~~
-5-
(47)
~~
A/C •••• TKlR •••• l
·--··-············M 5
~-··············(i~-8)
:~E;-=it(~
we .... TKl~/ 5
····-·····-·-n9)
FI LE ·······-··-··-· I .
LETIER •••••••••••• f{1 5
~-~~~~:~~: .. ~Jn ls
........... ·-······-··-·
(50)
FILE •••••••••••••••.••
LETTER ···-·-···i\11~
A/C •... TKLR • .I,.'~
---·····~
FILB:> ••• ~ •• 01)
LETTER ·······-AA l ~
A/C ••.. TKLR .J.f"
=~=.:fa\S
(52)
FILE ················-
LEnER ···········fl\\ ,.S
A/C -.TKLR -M_ \ s;
(53)
FILE ·······-··-
LETTER ·······-··-{'(\. \ s
A/C .... TKLR ....
···-··-·········---/'\ '\ s ···-··-··---x
FiLEP. •••••••••..••••• ( 5 4 )
LETTER •••.••••••••••
~~~~Wl\S
--·······--.lY\ S
(55)
Nt{S
iJ~
(57)
DISTRICTS 1 & 7
Consideration of Resolution No. 72-78, accepting Sanitary
Sewer Easement from Southern California Edison Company
for a permanent easement in connection with construction
of Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 1, Contract No. 7-6-1;
and authorizing payment in t~e amount of $1,224.00 for
said easement. See page Hyli
DISTRICTS 1 & 7
Consideration of motion ·approving Change Order No. 7, to
the plans and specifications for Sunflower Interceptor,
Reach 1, Contract No. 7-6-1, authorizing an addition of
$1,960.00 to the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting
Company. See page "Z"
DISTRICTS 1 & 7
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 8, to
the plans and specifications for Sunflower Interceptor,
Reach 1, Contract No. 7-6-1,· authorizing an adjustment
of engineer's quantities and a total deduction of $7,676.00
to the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting Company.
See page "AA"
DISTRICTS 1 & 7
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 9, to
the plans and specifications for Sunflower Interceptor, ·
Reach 1, Contract No. 7-6-1, granting an extension of
time of 16 calendar days to the contract with Sully-Miller
Contracting Company. ·See page "BB"
DISTRICTS 1 & 7
Consideration of Resolution No. 72-52, accepting Sunflower
Interceptor, Reach 1, Contract. No. 7-6-1, ai complete and
authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion. See
page "CC" -
DISTRICTS 1 & 7
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2, to
the plans and specifications for Main-Dyer Interceptor,
Reaches 25, 26, 27 & 28, Contract No. 1-12, authorizing
an adjustment of engineer's quantities and a total
addition of $1,760.00 to the contract with Mike Masanovich
Construction Company. See page "DD"
DISTRICTS 1 & 7
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3, to
the plans and specifications for Main-Dyer Interceptor,
Reaches 25, 26, 27 & 28, Contract No. 1-12, granting an
extension of time of 73 calendar days to the contract with
Mike Masanovich Construction Company. See page 11 EE"
DISTRICTS 1 & 7
Consideration of Resolution No. 72-79, accepting Main-Dyer
Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26, 27 & 28, Contract No. 1-12,
as complete and authorizing execution of a JJotice ~f
Completion. See page "FF."
DISTRICTS 1 & 7
Consideration of motion approving ~uspense fund warrants,
if any. See page "C" ·
DISTRICT 1
80-n-si--d--erat-4-on··of--me-t-iofro appr'ov-ing-· warrants-, -if---any.
Sec page "Bn
DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications, if any
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-6-
@ DISTRICT 7
~ Consideration of adoption of Ordinance No. 715, amending
_ '~ Ordinance 711, District's Uniform Connection and Use ~~~-1-Ordinance, amending and reaffirming Ordinance 712, and
.~:~······-·-repealing Ordinances 713 and 714. See page "GG"
>.JC •••• TIC~R
-·-·· .. ·· 0) DISTRICT 7 .
_ Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from
~-·-··£~ ~-~~\
A/C •••• TKLR -
H. Lawson Mead, dated April 20, 1972, Attorney for the
proponents of proposed Annexation No. 27 -Mead Annexation;
and approving ~equest that final action approving said
annexation be postponed ·pending outcome of proceedings
to annex said parcel to the City of Orange. See page "HH"
--·-·-··-·-( 61 )
~---··············
LETIER ••..••••.••.•• ·
AJC •.•• Tti
-··-·· 7
-....._ .....
A/C •••. TKLR ••••
(62)
®····~\£ (!§9 ...... ___ ff\
A/C •.•• TKLR -
(63)
FILEC>.. •••• ~--
LETIER ·······-··-
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of request of Farrow Development Corp. and
First Western Bank and Trust Company to annex portion of
Tract 6967 to the District, in the vicinity of Santiago
Boulevard and Walnut Avenue.
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff
memorandum re proposed annexation. See page "II"
Consideration of Resolution No. 72-66-7 ,~uthorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex approximately
5 acres of territory to the District (Proposed
Annexation No. 29 -Portion of Tract 6967). See
page "JJ"
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from
Irvine Industrial Complex, dated April 12, 1972, in
connection with construction of Jamboree Subtrunk Sewer
(a portion of the Master Plan subtrunk sewe~ system), to
approve request to proceed with said construction and
declaring intent to enter into standard Master Plan
Reimbursement Agreement upon completion. See page "KK"
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of items in connection with award of contract
for installation of sewers and appurtenances in Assessment
District No. 9
(a)
A/C •••• TKLR ·-N\ \ $
Consideration of motion to yeceive and file report of
Secretary of the Board of Direetors in connection with
receipt of sealed proposals for installation of sanitary
sewers and appurtenances in Assessment District No. 9.
See page "LL"
FILE ••••••••••••••••••
LETIER .••....•.•••• Q
A/C •••• TKLR ••• ~
-·-··-···-·-······· ( (C)1
FILE •••••••••.•.••••••• \.__/
LETIER .•.••.•. =:---, I s
A/C •••• TKLR •••• _ m
--····-··---(d)
FILED~
LETIER.-
A/C _TKJJl -
Report of Engineer of work. See page "MM"
Consideration of motion directini the Secretary of the
Board to notify property owners in Assessment District No. 9
of increase in cost to install sanitary sewers in said
district, as required under provisions of 1911 Act proceedings.
Consideration of motion to ~_ecei ve and _f__ile the following
letters from property owners requesting that the Board award
contract for installation of sanitary sewers in Assessment
District No. 9 to the low bidder, Ramar Company, in the
amount of $71,500.00:
1. From Frank F. Mead & Beata G. Mead, dated May 7, 1972.
See page "NN"
--·--2. From Dr. Sandy G. Mac Pherson, dated May 8, 1972.
---.. -... See page "OO"
FILE ···---·--·-
LETIER ·-·-
A/C _TKlR -
-···-·-··-....-.
( e)
tf\\5
3. From Speciality Restaurants Corporation, dated
May 8, 1972. See page "PP'!
4. Prom Ted G. Hayes, dated ~ay 8, 1972. See page "QQ ll
Consideration of Resolution No. 72-81-7 awarding contract for
the work described in Resolution of Intention u;. 72-42-7,
for installation of sanitary sewers a~d appurtenances in
Assessment Distrlct No. 9. See page ''RR"
···7-
~ .
(64) DISTRICT 7
M\S
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "C"
@ DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications, if any
~· (66) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn Cf':cJ-0
-8-
.-
II
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday, May 10, 1972
7:30 p.m .
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Aven'ue
Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
May 5, 1972
ATTENTION ALL DIRECTORS : Due to the current construction in Ellis
Avenue in the i mme diate vicinity of the entrance to the Administrative
· offic es a ll incoming traffic is being detoured. A map has been
enclosed with the notice of the meeting to direct vehicular traffic
to the Garfield entrance to our treatment facilities .
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
As a result of the municipal elections in April, the re will be
new Directors in most of the Districts . For the new Directors who
may not be familiar with our procedures, they require tha t prior to
eaeh meeting the General Ma nager submit a report, tog e ther with a
formal agenda, to provide background information necess a ry to a concise
understanding of' the principal i terns of business to be talcen up.
This report is for the next joint meeting of the Boards of
Directors of Districts Nos . 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, which meet
re g uJ.arly 'together on the second Wednesday of every month at 7:30 p.m.,
in the Di stricts ' off;ice at the above address. At each of' these
joint meetings, the Boards take up items rela ting to joint operations
of all the Districts and the individual Boards also take a ction on
current business of their respective Districts •. The Board of District
No. 8 meets quarter l y in Jul y, October, January and Apri l.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
The following is a brief explanation of the more important non-
routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not
otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are.not attached to the
agenda since they a re made up imn1ediately preceding the meeting but
will appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting.
Joint Boards
No. 3 -SEATING OF NEW DIRECTORS: Our office is currently being
advised of recent elections of new Mayors , appointment of a lt ernates
to the Mayors and other new Directors. A li st of Directors and .
alternates compiJ.ed from in.formation recej_ved to date is attached to
thi s report. An updated list will be . avai lable at the meeti!l g.
Nos. 4 through 10 -ANNUAL ELECTION OF DISTRICT CHAIRMEN: In accor-
danc e with the Districts' standard procedures , a chairman for each
District Board is elected annually at the reg ular May meeting . The
Joint Chairman a nd Vice Joint Chairman are elected at the July meeting,
following nominations at the June meeting. The Chairmen for the past
year were as follows:
District Chairma n Repre senting
1
2
3
5
6
7
11
Lorin Griset
Don Smith
Jos eph Hyde*
Lind s l ey Parsons*
Ellis N. Porter
Clifton 'Miller
Donald E. Shipley*
*No longer a Director
Santa Ana
Orange
Lo s Al amitos
Newport Beach
Co sta Mesa San . Dist .
Tus.tin
Huntington Beach
For the information of the new Directors, the Districts' reg u-
l ations provide that each Chairman automatically becomes a member of
the Executive Committee which_ ordina rily meets monthly at the call of
t h e Joint Chairman . This Committee, which is the only standing com-
mittee of the Directors, also includes the Joi nt Ch airman, Vice Joint
Ch airman, and the representative of the County Board of Supervisors.
Its function is to study and make recommendations to the Joint Boards
conc erning joint Districts ' matters such as budgets, salari es, p e r-
sonnel, polici es, etc.
No. 17 -CONSENT CALE ~IDAR : The follovdng agenda items fall into this
category in accordance with the definition estab l ished by the Boards :
(a ), (b), (c), and (d) Approval of Plans and Spe cific a tions -
Plans and specifica"E:ions for the four remaining Plant jobs
budgeted for this fiscal ye a r , as lis ted below, ha ve been
completed and are ready for approval and advertising fo r
bids. These jobs are a ll eligible for 80 % Fede r al and
State financing but owing to a change in the Federal
proc e dures, the Districts cannot award con.tracts until a
grant offer h as been made without loss of Federal funding .
Therefore the resolutions attached to the agenda authorize
the General Manager to establish the date of r e ceipt of
bids after the grant offer is forthcoming . Also required
now is a waiver by the Environmental Protection Agency of
its blanlrnt requirement for 85% Biochemical Oxygen Demand
(BOD) removal from all treatment plant effluents, whic h
requirement cannot now be me t by our Pl ants. However
this waiver h a s been applied for and hopefully will be
forthcoming in the next few weeks.
Th ese jobs and the engineer 's cons truction cost
estimates are as follows:
-2-
Job No. Title Estimate
I-8 -3 Influe nt Metering & Diversion
St ructure at Rec l amation Pl a nt
No. 1
$1,490 ,000
Pl-9 -1
a nd
J -4 -1
Add i t i onal Secondary Tr eat me nt
a t Reclamation Plant No. 1 a n d
Water Re use Facil ities at Pl ant
No. 2
$1 ,250,00 0
P2 -2 1 Di ges ters ''N" and ri o " at
Tre a t me nt Plant No . 2
$1,050 ,0 00
J -1 3
(e)
(f)
(h)
(i)
Shops and Warehouses $ 7 7 0 ,000
Comp letion of Plant Job No . I-7 ~3 -This job, Pump St a t ion
and Additions t o Bypass Facilities a t Reclamation Plant
No. 1, was s uccessfully c om pleted by the contract or, Healy
Tibb e tts Const ructi on Company, and put into operat ion last
month. We recommend the customa ry resol ution a ccepting
the job as complete on April 14 and authori zing fili ng of
a Notice of Comp l et ion .
and (g) Complet ion .o.f Plant J ob No . Pl-lR-1 a.nd P2 -1R-l -
Thi s Plan-€ job, Remodel Sedimentation Ba sin 3&4 at P l ant
No . 1 and Remod el Sedimentation Bas ins A, B, and C a t
Pla nt No . 2, was successfully completed on May 3 by the
contrac tor s F. T. Ziebarth, Inc. In or d er to clos e out
the job we are r ecomm ending Change Order No . 2 whic h adds
the sum of $377 to the contr act for addi tiona l work
order ed, as described on ·the formal cha nge order attached
to the agenda a nd a l s o grants an extension of time of 35
d a y s for the reasons stated in the change orde r. We also
recommend the customary resolution accep ting the job as
comp lete on Ma y 3 and a uthorizing fi ling of a Notice of
Com p l e tion·.
Addendum No . l to Pla nt Job No . P2-20 -Th i s job is the
Power ReITabiiity Proje ct a t Plant No : 2 and is also
elig ible for 80~6 F ederal and State f ina ncing . This recom-
mended addendum, as included in the agenda material, post-.
pones the bid op ening date to June 15 because .of Federal
gran t offer delays as described unde r Items 17 (a-d).
This addendum also makes certa in mi nor technic al changes
in the specifications.
Ch ange Ord er No. 3 to Job No . J-7-2 a nd J-12 -During the
c onstructi on of this project, Administrat ion and ·Engineer-
ing Building Additions and Vehicle Maintenance Facil ities,
the des i rab ili ty of ce rta in chang es invo lving additiona l
expense to the contrac tor becru..ne apparent to t he architec t
-3-
a n d our e n ginee r ing staff. Th e r ecommended c h ange o rde r
adding a total of $7 ,891 .36 t o the cont r act i s for the
additional work and c h a n g es desc r ibed in the formal c hang e
orde r attache d to the agenda. I t wi l l be not ed tha t t he
gre a ter portion of thi s sum i s for installa tion of 3,000
feet o f electrica l c a ble to p rovide a new p ower supp l y f or
t h e laboratory building .
No. 19 -REP ORT OF THE SPECIAL CO MM I TT EE ON AGREEME NT WITH ORANGE
COU1ITY WATER DI SrrR ICT: At t h e r e g ular meeting on Ma rch 9 an agree -
me n t was consi de r ed wh ich provide d for t he f u rni s h i ng , at no charg e ,
o f 1 5 mi l lion g a l l ons pe r d a y of s e condar y treat e d was tewater by the
Districts to the Or ang e Coun t y Water District and the acceptance of
an equivalent am ount o f brine wastes from t he Water Di s trict 's se a
wa t er de s a l ting -s e\vag e r e c l am at ion p lant . The a g reeme nt a l s o contains
provi sions for other l ess sig nific ant a rea s of mutu a l cooperation
b etwe e n the two a g encies. Be c ause of an obj e c tion r ais e d to the
wo r ding of c e rt ain p o rtions of t he ag reement, a Spe c i al Committee
c onsisting of Di r e c tor s Don McJ.nni s (Chairman), Don Smith and Henr y
Wedaa wa s app oint e d to study the ma tter and to r e p o rt to the Joint
Boards in t wo mo n t hs . In t h e interim the Comm itte e h a s be e n pur suing
its a s signment d iligently and is p r e p a red to repo r t a s dire cte d.
I nclude d wit h the a g enda ma t eri a l i s a staff mem o r andwn s umm arizing
charges made for r e claime d wate r by o t her agencies i n this are a .
Al so inc luded is a copy of t he Commit tee's Ma rch 30 s uggested r e vision
o f the origi nall y presen ted a g r e e me nt .
No . 20 -PROP OSAL FOR PREPARATIO N OF ENV I RO NMENTAL IMPAC T S'r ATEM ENT S :
At t he reg ula r me eting j .n April the Bo a rds, a t the r e c.omrnend a tion o f
t he Exec u tiv e Committ e e " di r ected t h e General Manage r to o btain a
propos a l from Ri c h a r d Te r ry a nd As s o ci a te s , of Anah eim, to p r ep are
En vi r onme nt a l n npact Stateme nt s for projec ted 1972-73 Pl ant con-
s t ruction. This firra 1 s p roposal i s inc luded in the age n da ma te r ial
and we re c orrune nd i ts a cc e ptance .
Th e staff i s particularly a nxious t o p roceed · wi th these s t ate-
me nts since they a re r equire d for any Federa l or St a t e assis te d project
pri or to filing app licati on f or grant s and we be lieve it desira b l e to
fi le suc h a p plic a tion at the e a rlies t possib le d a te.
The sta ff has asked Te r ry and Associate s t o prepare t wo sta te-
ments, on e for the expect e d n e c e ssa ry additi on of a h i g her degre e of
treatme nt at Pla nt No. 1 and t h e s e cond for ot.he r Plant i mp rovem ents
and additions. Dividi ng the prepar a tion o f the stat eme nts into two
par ts wi ll allow t he f i rm to c on centrate on t h e improv ed deg r ee o f
treatme nt p ortion o f t he work in o r d e r tha t a t a r get d a te o f Au g u s t 1
f or subm ittal of the r e port fo r t his p or tion o f t h e Plant work can
be met . The ot her r eport i s sche duled f or c omp leti on and subm i t t a l
on Octobe r 1 .
No . 2 1 -SANT A ANA RIVER-SA NTIA GO CREEK GREE NB ELT PIJi.N: Included in
t he a g enda ma t e rial is a l e t t er d a ted Ap r i l 18 from Director Casp ers ,
Chair man of the Oran g e County Boar d of Superv i s ors , re ques t ing the
Distr icts to a dop t a resolution approvi ng t h e p rog r am . The st a ff
-4 -
r e comm e nds tha t this matte r be re ferred to the Execut i ve Committe e
for s t udy and recomm e ndat i on to t he Joint Boar ds at t h e June mee ting .
No . 22 -SO UTHERN CALIFO RN IP4 COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT ( SCCWRP) :
For the informa t i on of the new Dire ctor s , t h is project is a r esear c h
effort bein g participated in by five of the maj or Southe r n Ca lifornia
d ischa rgers of was tewater to the ocea n , County of Ventura , Los Angeles
County Sanitation Di stricts, City of J.Jos Jmg e le s, County o f San Dieg o,
and our D:Ls trict s . Since its incep tion in 196 9 former Di rec t or
Lindsley Parsons h a s be en the rep re sentative of the Districts on the
governing body of the p r oject. Mr. Pars ons h a s requested that the
materi a l , included with the agend a , -be presented to the Directors for
t his meeting. It i s be lieved that t h is material i s large ly sel f-
explanatory but Mr c Parsons will be present to make a repo:rt and
answer any ques tions the 'Di.r ectors may h ave.
Districts Nos. 5 an d 6
No . 30 -.INCREASE IN ENGINEER ING FEE FOR CO NTRACT NO, 5-19 : This
cont r a ct f or t he installn.tion of a 24-inch maste r plan paral lel forc e
main sewer f r om Rocky Point t o the Santa Ana River sipl1on wi l l be
ready for a dve r tisin g for bid~ in June . From Rocky Point to Bitter
Point the force ma in will be installe d in Pad.fi e Coast Highway,
with the remain ing portion. constructed in a Dis tr:i_c t s 1 m•me d easement
thr oug h the Banni ng property .
During the course of the design, the staff sugge sted that
cert a in nec essary remedial work on the existing Dist.:rict g r avi ty
sewer in the highway fr om the Arc h es northwesterl y to Bitte r Point be
includ ed in this contract. It i s n eces sary that this work be
accomplished in the nea r future and it appears t hat it can be don e
more ec onom ically as a part of the fo r ce ma in cont r a ct , wh ich procedure
will a lso e limi nate the necessity of' two separate c ons truction job s
in the hj.ghway . Ac cord ingl;>r , we as ke d the Di stricts' engineer to
s u bmit prop o sals fo r this extra work to be .added to his basic fee
($37,500) fo r the design of the for ce main .. Copies of t h e s e prpp osal s
are includ ed i n t he agenda materia l and it i s recomme n d ed that the y
be ac c epted and the basic design fee be i ncre ased by t h e sum o f
$4,500 t o a new lump swn fee of $42,000.
Di strict No. 2
No. 38 -ADDE NDUM NO , 3 TO CONTHA CT NO . 2 -14 -1: Bids for this contract
f or the construction o f the fi r st reach of the Santa Ana River Inter-
ceptor Sewer (f rom Pl ant No . 1 to Kat ella Avenue) wi ll b e opened on
May 1 1 . Scheduling of this work a ...r1d additional reaches of the i nter -
c epto r was extensively discuss e d at the adjoul'ne d meeting on Ap ril 2 7
in connection with a reque s t for annexation o f land in the Santa Ana
Canyon area east of the pr esent District.. Su bse quent to a dvertisi ng
for b id the District's eng inee r and staff have concluded tha t certain
change s in the contra ct documents should be mad e wh ich a re incorpo-
r ated in Addendum No. 3 (copy included in the agenda material). Th e
addendum requires the contrac t o r to n am e the manufacturer who will
-5··
furnish the pipe> adds inadvertently omitted u..nit p ric es for additional
b eddin g g r ave l and malces revisions in the specifications fo r the
internal vinyl plastic ·liner :Lnstalled by the pipe manufacture r. The
latte r change will have the effect of increasing competition for the
supplying of this material. We recommend adoption of the addendum.
No. 39 -REQUES T OF CAL STATE FULLERTON FOR DEFERRAL OF USE . CHARGES :
Included in the agenda material is a l etter dated Apr i l 28 f rom
Ca lifornia State College at Fullerton requesting a deferment to July 1
of billing for 1971 use charges . The request a l so asks the Board to
waive the established delinquency cha r ge and to allow billing in the
future on a fiscal year basis.
For the information of the new Directors, a ll District s adopted
a uniform connection and 'use ordinance which b.ecame effective
J anuary 1, 1971. This ordinance establishes connection and use
charges for large waste producers , with a credi t · for the ass e ssed
valuation of the estab lishment . Since t h e college has no assessed
v a luat ion., the computed use cha r ge for 1971 a-mounted to $1 ~982 .23 .
We recommend app roval of the college's r eques t.
Di strict No . 3
No. 43 -APPROVAL OF CONSOLIDATION AGREEMENT WITH.D I STRICT NO. 4 :
Thi s con s olidation 1•1as discussed extens ive ly at an adjourned meeting
of the Board on April 21, meeting jointly with the Board of Di rect ors
of District No . J-1-. After the agreement s ubmitted at that time fai l ed
to receive a u n animous vote as requi red by l aw to avoid an e l ec tion in
both Di s tric ts, the staff was instructed to place the ma t ter on the
ag~nda for this meeting .
For the bene fit of the n ew Directors , District No . 4 consists
of the older part of Seal Beach, the northerly portion of t.he City
being already within District No . 3 . The consolidation will permit
Di strict No . 4 to take out of service an exi sting treatment p l ant
di schar ging to the San Gabriel River estuary and divert the flm<T to
a n existing District No. 3 pump station at Se al Beach Boulevard and
Westminster Avenue . The proposed consolidation agreement is being
prepare d by the General Coun se l and a copy will be f urni shed each
Dire ctor at the meeting .
Distric ts Nos . 1 and 7
No . 47 -PURCHASE OF EASEMENT: The staff h a s settled for the s um of
$1 ,224 for a n e cessary easement f or t he Sunflower Interceptor across
Edison Company r ight of way adjacent to the east side of the Santa
Ana River . We recomme nd approval o f the purchase a n d acceptance of
the easement .
Nos. 48 through 51 ~ CLOSEOUT OF CONT RACT NO. 7-6-1: This $2 .3 mi llion
project with Sully-Mi ller Contracting Compar1y was satisfactorily
comp leted on Ma rch 25. We therefore rec ommend formal acceptance by
-6-
the Boa r d and authorization for filing of Notice of Com p l etion (Item
No . 51). It em No. 48 is recommended Change Order No . 7 adding $1,960
to the contract price for the reason explained in the formal change
order included with the agenda ma terial . Item No . 49 is Change Order
No. 8, the customary adjustment of quantiti es deducting the sum of
$7,676 from the contract prj_ce to reflect quantities of material
actua lly insta lled on a unit pr:i..ce basis as compared with the quantities
orig inally estimated. Item No . 50 is Ch ange Order No. 9 grant ing an
extension of time of 16 days for the reasons stated on the change order
form.
Nos. 52 throug h 54 -CLO SE OUT OF CONTRA.CT NO, 1-12: This $475,000
proj ect with Mike Masanovich Const ruction Co., Inc., was satisfactorily
comp l eted on May 5, Recommended Change Order No. 2 (Item No. 52) is
the customary adjus t ment of quantities adding .the sum of $1 ,760 to the
cont ract price to ref l e ct quantitl.es of material actually installed.
on a unit price basis as compared with the quantit ies originally esti-
mat ed . It em No. 53 is Change Order No. 3 granting an extensi on of
time of 73 days to the contract for the reasons stated in the formal
change order. Item No. 54 is the r e commended resolut ion accepting
the work as complete and authorizing filing of a Notice of Completion.
District No . 7
No . 59 -ADOPTIO N OF ORDINANCE NO. 715: This ordinance, copy included
with the agen da material, is scheduled f or adoption at this mee ting
"in order that it may g o into effec t July 1 . The Directors will recall
that its adoption earlier '!:ms d e l ayed in order to allow the required
30 days to notify affected persons and agencies prior -to adoption.
This notice was mailed on March 29. Tne ordinance, which has been
thoroug hly discussed at earlier Board meetings, basically provides for
an increas e in connection fees for multiple dwelling units from the
pres ent $15 0 to $250.
No . 60 -REQUEST FOR DEL..~Y-I N PROCEEDINGS ON AN1TEXATION NO . 27:
L11clu ded in the agenda mat e rial is a letter f rom the attorney for the
proponents of this 1 20-acre annexat ion requesting that the Board delay
approval of the annexation, pending annexation of t he same parcel to
the City of Orange. We recommend approval of the request.
No. 61 -PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TRACT 692·7: It will ·b e recalled that
this 5-acre proposed annexation on Santiag o Boulevard was referred to
the staff for report at tr.i.is meet ing . This re.port . i·s included in the
agenda material and finds that the proposed annexat i on conforms with
District policy . We therefore recommend the resolution i ncluded with
the agenda mat erial (It em No. 6l(b)) authorizing initiation of
annexation proceedings. ·
No. 62 -AUTHORIZING IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX TO PROCEED WITH THE
CO NS TRU CTIO N OF THE JAMBO REE SUBTRUl\TK SE~·JER: Included with the
agenda ma terial is a l etter from the Complex on this subject. We
rec ommen d approval of the request.
-7-
•
No. 63 -REPORT ON ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO . 9: Bids for the instal-
l ation of sewer s in this District we re opened on May 2 (b id tabula tion
included in the agenda material ). The Eng ineer of Wo rk will report
o n the status of this project.
P aul G. Brown
Assis t ant Gene ral Man ager
-8-
. .
DIRECTOR LIST
Agency
~IES
Anaheim
Brea
Buena. Park
Cypress
Fountain Valley
Fullerton
Huntington Beach
Irvine
Laguna Beach
La Ha.bra
La Palma
Los Alamitos
Newport Beach
Orange
Placentia
Santa Ana
Seal Beach
Stanton
Tustin
Villa Park
Yorba Linda
SANITARY DISTRICTS
Costa Mesa San. Dist
Garden Grove San.
Dist.
Midway City San.
Dist.
South Laguna San.·
Dist.
Name
Mark A. Stephenson
Donald L. Fox
Jesse M. Davis
Otto Lacayo
Edward E. Just
George B. Scott
Robert E. Root
Norma Gibbs
Jack Green
Henry H. Duke
Henry Quigley
Richard Goldberg
William H. Roberts
Charles Stevens, Jr
Cor Vanderwaal
Charles Long
Carl Kymla.
Donald Mc Innis
John Store
Howard Rogers
Don Smith
Robert Finnell
Lorin Griset
Wade Herrin
H. K. Holden
Alicita Lewis
Clifton Miller
Donald Winn
Henry Wedaa.
Ellis N. Porter
Nonnan E. Culver
Derek McWhinney
Clay N. Mitchell
District No/s
2,3
2,3
3
3
2
3
2,3
11
3
11
7
8
2
3
3
3
5
5
6
7
2,7
2
1,7
2,3
3
3
1,7
2
2
1,6,7
2,3
3
8
\ COUNTY AREAS
Chainnan of the Board
of Supervisors Ronald W. Caspers 5,6,8
Member of the Board
of Supervisors David L. Baker 11
Member of the Board
f Supervisors Robert W. Battin 1,3
~mber of the Board
of Supervisors Ralph B. Cla~k 7
Member of the Board
of Supervisors William J. Phillips 2
5/5/72
Alternate
Jack C. Dutton
Tom Kowalski
Ralph K. Hines
Alice Frankiewich
Al Hollinden
Al Hollinden
Louis Reinha.rdt
Alvin M. Coen
Alvin M. Coen
Alvin M. Coen
William Fischbach
Charles Stevens,Jr
William H.· Roberts
Edward J. Byrne
Kenneth Miller
Donald Mc Innis
Richard Croul
Donald Mc Innis
Donald Mc Innis
Jess Perez
Robert Langer
Wade· Herrin
Lorin Griset
Thomas Barnes
Albert Nuijens
Ralph Welsh
Dorothy M. Potter
Rudy Castro
Ronald w. Caspers
Ronald w. Caspers
Ronald w. Caspers
Ronald W. Caspers
i!:EET ?4-JG DATE __ na.......;· y~l_O ...;_, _1_9_7_2_ TI ME 7 :30 p .m. D IST R ICT S 1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ,7 & 1 1
3D I STRICT 1 ACTIVE DIRECTORS
\HE RRIN) ...... GR I S ET ...... V
(CASPERS ) ..... BATTIN .•.... §/: === === -(coco) ........ MILLER ....•.
PO RTER •.••. ·----vL= === ===
.,nIST RICT 2
HILEMAN).···· SMITH '.·····~----
. CULVER . • . . . ----
(LANGER) .•..•• FINNELL.... ----
(KO WA LS KI) .•.. FOX ........ ----
(GR I SET ) ...... HERRIN . . . . . __ --
(HOLLINDE N) ... JUST.;..... ___ _
(ROBE RTS ).···· NEVIL...... ----
(CASPERS ) ..... PHILLIPS... --__
(REI NH ARDT) ... ROO T....... ___ _
~DUTT ON) ••.... ST EPHE NSON . ___ _
CAST RO) ....•. WED AA. ..•... _Y....J' ___ _
POTTE R) ••.••• WI Nr-.l •.•...• _lL_ ___ _ I
I
JOINT BOARDS ACTIVE DI RECTORS
CHOLLI NDEN) ... JUST ....••.. ~ __
(--c.ASE.ERs) ••••• BAKE R ..••••. ~
(-eA"St'1:RS) ..... BATT IN· . · ..• -1L--===
®At'.l PE RS ...•• ~ __ (~p..&R-S) ..... CLAR K· · · .. · . __
CULVER·······~
(HINES)····.·· DAVIS······· ~==
(COEN )······· ·DUKE ········ ~-
(LANGER) ••. • •• FINNELL····· --=--r--~
~~g~~r~:~:::: :~fiii: ::: ::: ~ === (co_ EN) ........ GREE N .•....• =rz; --
4DISTRICT 3 ~ I
(CASPERS).···· BATTIN..... :;/--v
(HE RRIN)····· ·GR I SE T· · · · • · -::7:---
(GR I S ET ) •... · ·HERRIN ······ °7 --
(BARNES) •... · · HO l...DEN • • • • • • ~ --
(MC I NNIS) ..• • l<YM LA· · · • · • · ~ --
(FRANK! EWICH) ·LACAYO ······ ~ --
(NUIJE NS) ••... LEW I S ······· -jr --
(MI LLE [<) •• ····LONG ········ -:--r --
(CROUL ) •..•.. ·MC I NNIS · · • · --1L....L --
MC WH I NN EY· • ..// --'
(WELSH)······ ·MILLER······ ~-
(ROBERT S)···· ·NEVIL.······' 7 --CULVER ..•.• --1.L.~ v
(HINE S ).······ DAY IS··· ... ~~~ KOVJA~S KI) • • · FOX · · · · · • • • --
COENJ· • · · · · · · GREEN . . . . . . __ __t,. ~FRAN l<JE W IC H~ LACAYO·.··· ± __ ~
(NU I JENS) • • • · LEWIS·· •... _L __ ~ ~MILLE R}····· LONG ··· .... ~--· ~v /
GRISET} ..... HERRIN····· __
CBARNES} •.••• HO LDEN . . . . . . ---
MC WHINNEY. --d __ ~
(REI NHARDT) ••. ROOT······· ~ _
(HOLLINDEN) ··SCOT T·····.
(DUTTON )····· S TEPHENSON. === .
(ROBERTS )···· ST EVEN S.·.· ===z:_
(BYRNE)······ VANDERWAAL. =z=·=== :=iZ:
-i..D ISTRI CT 5 ~(BAKER) ....••. Gi°:SPERS.... ·~ ___ _
MC IN NIS) •.. KYM LA ....•.• ~z -_-_-
CROUL) ..•..• MC INNIS •..
2 DISTRICT 6
PORTER· · · • · _L ___ _
(PHILLIPS)··· ··6':8PE~&· · .. ~ ___ _
(MC INNI S )··· ·STORE······ --4,L ___ _
~DISTRICT 7 '7 /£@
(WELSH)······ ·MILLER····· ~~ ~«
(CASPERS)·····CLAR K······ =:.:2"' ~
(HERRIN) ..•.•• GRI S ET...... t;F:~
PORTER ••.... ~ ~ (~ISCHBAC~) ••. QUIGLEY..... __i.c_~~.
~ INNIS) ••.• "@OL~~...... ---1.L:~
CPEREz) •.••.•. SMITH .•...•• __ -4.L _lL._
2 ~~::~~;:/~. ··BAKER • • · · · · ~/ --
(COEN).······· DUKE • • . . . . . 'l.,t./i6 --
(COEN).······· ·&lBBS·...... . ----
DISTRICT 8 ·~~ ~ . DBERG • • · ----
(CLAR td· · • • • • • CAS ,RS · • · · ----
MITCHELL • • • -----
5/9/72
( GA-Si""ER-S) • • • • ·?HI LL I P S • • • • -7 --·
POR T ER· • • • • · -=-r --
(FI SCHB A\H). ··QUI GLEY·····~ --
(MC I NN I s) •.. -.. ~8.@.~l~S •• • • • • -7: __
ROOT' •... •••• _JL.,L' -
(HOLLINDEN) ···SCOT}······· ~ --
(PEREZ) · · · • • • • SM IT i-l • • • • • • • ~ --
' (DUTTON)······ STE PH ENSON·· ~ --
1 (ROBER T S) • • · · ·ST EVENS · · · · • -7 __
· {MC I NN I S)··· ·STORE ······· ~-l (BYRNE)······ ·VAND ER\-1/AAL· • v ./ __
I . -~~ \CA S T RO) • • • • • ·WED AA · • · · • • · ---
1 (POTTER )····· ·WIN N········ ___ _
I
l
OTHERS
* * * * *
GOLDBERG· • · • ----
Ml TCHELL • • • • ----
HARPER
BROvm
SYLVESTER
LE WIS
DUNN
CLA RK E
SIGLER
NISSON
TAYL OR
BRO WN
BOETTNER
CARL SON
FIN STER
GALLOWA Y
HOH EN ER
Hm~ARD
HUNT
KEITH
LYNCH
MADDOX
MARTINSON
MURO NEY
PIERS ALL
STEVENS
~':EET fNG DATE __ Ma_y_1_0_, _1_9_7_2 _ TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11
DISTRICT 1 ACTIVE DIRECTORS ------. TH ERR IN) •••••• GR I SET .••••• _./_ ----
~CASP[:Rs) .•••• BATT.IN •••••• _./ ____ _
' C 0 C 0 ) • • • • • • • • M I LL ER. • • • • • ./ --r----PORTER ••• ; •• -. ____ _
DISTRICT 3 ~1
(CASPERS).···. BATTIN ••••• _..;_ w"'1 __
CULVER.· ••• ·i-"---~---
(H It~ES ). • • • • •• DAV IS •••• 1~"f~-~--_./ __ _
( KO~lAl-S KI) • • • FOX • • •••••• -" ___ ..,; __ _
(COEN).······· GREEN •••••• -"-__ / __ _
(FRANKIErlICH~ LACAYO· •••• -~-__:!__ __
(NUIJENS) • • • • LEWIS·· •. ~· _J _ _L __
(MILLER} · • • • .• LONG •.••••• -"-__ I __ _
(GR I SET}· • • • • HERRIN • •• • • _, ___ ../ __ _
(BARNES}····· HOLDEN ••••• _1 ___ i __ _
MC WHINNEY. _1 ___ .; __ _
(RE I NHARDT) ••• ROOT· • • • • • • _.1_ --"'--~
(HOLL I NDEN) • · SCOTT.· •••• _,_ --"-__
(DUTTON) • • • • • STEPHE~~SON. _I ___ .,,_ --·-
(ROBERTS) • • • • STEVENS···· .; "
(BYRNE) • • • • • • VANDERWAAL. ~ ./ ==
DISTRICT 5
~.BAKER) •••••• ~CASPERS •.••
MC INNISJ ••• KYMLA •.•.••
CROUL) •••••• MC INNIS •••
DISTRICT 6
.,/ ------
_./_ ----
"'
PORTER· • • • • _./ ____ _
(PH I LLI PS)···· CASPERS'···· _./_ ----
(MC INNIS)····STORE······ _./ ____ _
DISTRICT 7 1 ,,.-~ / d
( \'IELSH) · • • • • • ·MILLER· • • • • ./ ..; .,
(CASPERS)·····CLARK······ ~ ~ ~
(HERR I N) · ••••• GR I SET •••••• -<---"'-· _ti -
PORTER •••••• -'---"--'-r .. T SCHBAC~) ••• QUIGLEY ••••• --7--~-__ v _
~ INNIS).· •• ROGE~5 •••• •. ----~---" -
(PEREZ).······ SMITH •••••.•• -L. _./_ -~
DISTRICT 11
(CASP~RS)· • • • • BAKER •. • • • • • ~ ------
( "'61!N) · • · . • • • • DU KE • • • • ~ :. ~\.--~------( c OEN,·· • • • • · • C-IBBS ••••••• _L_ ___ _
DISTRICT 8
GOLDBERG • • • ------
(CLARK)······· CASPERS • • • • ------
MITCHELL.·· ------
5/9/72
JO I NT EO,~RDS ACTIVE DIRECTORS
(HOLLI NDEN) •.• JUST •••••••• _I __ _
(CASPERS) ••••• BAKER....... ./ __
(CASPERS) ••••• BATTIN •••••• ~ __
· C»::SF~~s •••••
(CASPERS) ••• ··CLARK·······---;;--==
CULVER······ ~
(HIN ES)· • • • • • ·DAV IS· • • • • • • -,;---
(COEN)········ DU KE········ ~ ==
.(LANGER)··.: •• FI NM ELL····· + --
(KOWAL-SKI).·. ·FOX········· ___ _ (COEN)·~······ SIB~······· _v' __ _
(COEN)·· • • • • • ·GREEN· • • • • • • _/ __ _
(HERRIN)····· ·GRISET· • • • • • -"--· -
(GRISET). ·.···HERRIN······_,,,.,_ --
(BARNES) •.• ·.·HOLDEN······ -/---
(MC INN Is) ... · KYMLA"· •• •• · • -"'---
( FRANKI EWI CH) ·LACAYO.·····_..,,,_ --
(NUIJENS) •• ···LEWIS······· -.,,/---
(MILLER)····· ·LONG········_.,_ --
(CROUL). ······MC INNIS····_.,_ --
MC WHINNEY· • -~---
(WELSH)······ ·MILLER······-"'---
(ROBERTS)····· NEVIL······•.-" ---
(CASPERS)···· ·PHILLIPS····-"'---
PORTER· • • • • • _,,,_ --~FISCHBACH)·.· QUIGLEY····· -"'---\MC INNIS) •••• R-GGERS ••• · ••• _..,,, __ _
ROOT •••••••• _.,, ---
(HO LL I NDEN) ···SCOTT· • • • • • • _J_ --
(PEREZ)·· • • • ··SM I TH···· • • • -./---
(DUTTON) • · • ···STEPHENSON·· -·'---
(ROBERTS)····· STEVENS····· -' ---
! (MC INNIS)··· ·STORE······· _I __ _
(BYRNE) • • • • • • • VANDERWAAL • • _.1 _ ----
(CASTRO)····· ·WEDAA· • • • • • .. • + --
(POTTER)···· · ·WINN····· • • • --. __
OTHERS
* * * * *
GOLDBERG· • • • ----
MITCHELL· • • • -----
BOETTNER
CARLSON
FINSTER
GALLOWAY
HOH EN ER
HOWARD
HUNT
KEITH
LYNCH
MADDOX
MARTINSON
MU RONEY
PIERSALL
STEVENS
Q .
,,, '. { .• ,,~ ~1\4-,.:., ~
v
'-"" .
Chairman Just
Call meeting of the Executive Committee for 5:30 p.m.,
Wednesday, May 31st. Invite Directors Donald Fox and
Robert Root, or Directors Vanderwaal and Long.
Indoctrination and tour of treatment facilities for the
new Directors to be held 5:30 to 8:30 p.m., May 17th or 18th.
A light dinner will be served approximately 6:30 p.m. (Ask
for hand count on the number of Directors attending).
-"i -~ ,.·, .--~
I
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
·May 10, 1972 -7:30 p.m .
. ,.
:~
WAnRANT NO.
J'7864
~865
.1(866
17867
17868
17869
17870
17871
17872
17873
17874
17875
17876
17877
17878
17879
17880
17881
17882
17883
17884
17885
17886
17887
17888
17889
17890
17891
17892
17893
17894
17895
17896
17897
17898
17899
17900
17901
17902
17903
17904
17905
17906
17907
17908
17909
17910
17911
17912
J7913
'914 ~915
17916
17917
17918
17919
17920
17921
17922
17923
17924
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
A-1 Equipment Rentals, Equipment Rental $
Adams-Sullivan Inc., Conveyor Parts
Adept Mfg. Inc., Rotor Repair
All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings
Allied Bolt & Supply Co., Hardware
Alpine Aromatics, Inc., Odor Control Chemicals
American Lock & Supply, Inc., Hardware
American Standard, Inc., Bearings
City of Anaheim, Power
Anaheim Sewer Construction, Lateral Repair
The Anchor Packing Co., Pump Packing
Applied Science Laboratories, Inc., Lab Supplies
Associated Concrete Products, Manhole Rings
Associated Laboratories, Lab Testing
Azusa Western, Cement
Gerald Baldwin, CWPCA Conference Expense
Barnes Delaney, Conveyor Parts
Bassett Office Furniture Co., Office Furniture
Bearing Specialty Coo, Bearings
Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams
Buckeye Brass Foundry, Inc., Pump Parts (MO 2-9-72)
Burke Engineering Co., Controls
C & R Reconditioning Co., Shaft & Pump Repair
California Collator Sales, Binding Supplies
State of Calif. Public Employees Retirement System,
Retirement System Administrative Fee
Leonard Carney, CWPCA Conference Expense
John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services.
Castle Controls, Inco, Valves
Certified Laboratories, Inc., Solvent
R.B. Clapp Co., Inco, Controls
Clark Dye Hardware, Tools
Clark Equipment Company, Wheel Loader Parts
W.No Clarke, CWPCA Conference Expense
College Lumber Company, Building Materials ·
Concrete Coring Company. Core Drilling
Consolidated Elect. Distr. Inc., Electrical Supplies
Constructors Supply Co., Tools & Supplies
Control Specialists, Inc., Compressor Parts
Cook & Tillitt Freight Service, Inco, Freight
Paul A. Cooper, Grit Removal
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
Costa Mesa County Water District, Water
County of Orange, Tract Maps
County Sanitation District of L.A. County, Oil Disposal
Curtin Scientific Co., Lab Supplies
Daily Pilot, Employment & Leg9l Ads
Daniels Tire Service, Tire Repair
John M. Deck, Equipment Parts
DeGuelle & Sons Glass Co •• Truck Parts & Repair
Diesel Control Corp., Engine Repairs
Dominguez Marine & Industrial Supply, Valves
T.A. Dunn, CWPCA Conference Expense
E 0 I. DuPont De Nemours & Co., Training Manuals
Eastman Inc., Office Supplies
Enchanter, Inco, Ocean Research & Monitoring
Enterprise Printing Co., Printing
FMC Corporation, Shaker Parts
Fairfax Electronics, Inc., Comrnunication·Equipment
Fibre Glass Evercoat Co., Inc., Mtce. Supplies
Fischer & Porter Co., Instrumentation
Fisher Controls Co., Compressor Parts
A-1
AMOUNT
15075
321.30
140.00
229020
172.80
546000
155019
1,370.90
15.04
50.00
164.77
156 093
140025
17.00
106. 51
71.19
30.'35
57.17
982.68
·37.50
3,396.48
367.08
795.00
145c.60
-156 .oo
67.69
208.46
'91.42
309.61
989.29
16.38
61.50
89.90
395.95
162.00
1,791.98
496094
77.89
17.49
l,008o00
197.97
6000 6.oo
116014
112.45
46.18
28.00
8.46
75.89
458.47
2,998.81
73.69
512.40
195.20
2,070.00
74.39
120.70
560050
112.56
546.38
265016
WARRANT NO.
17925
17926
17927 -'"7928
.,.,929
17930
17931
17932
17933
17934
17935
17936
17937
17938
17939
17940
17941
17942
17943
17944
17945
17946
17947
17948
17949
17950
17951
17952
17953
17954
17955
17956
17957
17958
17959
17960
17961
17962
17963
17964
17965
17966
17967
l7968
17969
17970
17971
17972
17973
17974
17975
17976
17977
,7 978
~979
17980
17981
17982
17983
17984
17985
17986
17987
17988
IN F.AVOR OF
William H. Fox, Employee Mileage & CWPCA Conf. Expo $
Freeway Machine & Welding Shop, Machining (MO 2-1-72)
Garden Grove Lumber & Cement Co., Bldg. Mat 1 ls.
General Electric Supply Co., Electrical Supplies
General Telephoqe Co. of Calif.
Georgia-Pacific Corpo, Chlorine
Graybar Electric Company, Inc., Electrical Supplies
Green Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
Dr. Ro Monte Greinetz, Employee Mileage
Charles G. Hardy, Inc., Hardware
Fred Ao Harper, Various Mtgs. & CWPCA Conf. & COD Exp.
Hertz Equipment Rentai Corp., Equipment Rental ·
Hewlett Packard Co., Lab Supplies
Hilti Fastening Systems, Hardware ·
Howard Supply Co., Piping Su~plies
City of Huntington Beach, Water
Huntington Beach Art Gallery, Frames
Industrial Water Conditioning, Lab Equipment Rental
International Harvester, Co., Truck Parts.
J & M Service, Equipment Parts
Kar Products, Inc., Hardware
Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies
King Bearing, Inc., Bearings
S.P. Kinney Engineers, Inc., Recirculation Strainers
Kleen Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies
Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tools & Hardware
L & N Uniform Supply Coo, Uniform Rental
The Lacal Company, Inco, Pump Packing
Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Sweeper Parts
WoH. Landon, CWPCA Conference Expense
Judy Lee, Employee Mileage
Liquid Carbonic Corpo, Lab Supplies
Mc Coy Ford Tractor, Tractor Parts
Mesa Supply, Engine Parts
J.Co Meyer, Lab Equipment
Paul :Munroe H~rdraulics, Inc., Pump
Munselle Supply Company, Inc., Safety Equipment
National Chemsearch Corp., Solvents
City of Newport Beach, Water c. Arthur Nissen, Gen'l. Counsel Retainer & Fees
Noland Paper Company, Inc., Reproduction Paper
ODA Nursery, Sh~ubbery
Orange County Radiotelephone
Orange County Stamp Co., Office Supplies
Pacific Telephone ·
M.C. Patten & Co., Inc., Boiler Parts
Perkin Elmer Corp., Lab SuppJ.ies
John J. Phillips,1Employee Mileage
Pomeroy, Johnston & Bailey, Lab Testing
Postmaster
Douglas E. Preble, Employee .Mileage
The Register, Employment Ad
Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Steel & Aluminum Stock
Robbins & Myers, Inc., Test Materials
San Bar, Ecological Research Supplies
Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Supplies
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Rewind
Sargent.Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies
Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies
Smith Optical Service, Safety Glasses
Southern Calif. Edison Co.
Southern Calif. Gas Coo
Southern Calif. Water Co.
A-2
.AMOUNT
57.46
5,650073
126 •. ., 4
160.86
1,903.59
1,468.38
683.08
125037
34.86
120.-07
292.84
106005
94.50
35049
1,405.24
33.93
74.97
40.00
82078
9o07
459 .oo
432.69
167.22
1, 718. 4c'.»
361.54
24.26
593097
1,943.07
201.38
7.74
138065
21.45
454.25
6.38
242.76
38.00
324.83
40.43
91.35
153053
728045
351.23
40o43
49046
6.49 380.20
199.50
7.19
103.80
12050
50Q.OO
45.54
27.36
1,125.04
281.40
80.01
132025
86016
41060
150049
. 35070
17,487.00
691.78
3.39
WARRANT NO.
17989
17990
17001 ..., I J./ ..._
1 7992
993
17994
17995
17996
17997
17998
17999
18000
18001
18002
18003
18004
18005
18006
18007
18008
18009
18010
18011
18012
18013
18014
18015
18016
18017
18018
18019
18020
18021
18022
18023
18024
18025
18026
18027
18028
18029
18030
18031
18032
J8033
~034
10035
18036
IN FAVOR OF
Southwest Processors, Oil Removal
Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Distilled Water
Speed-E Auto PartB, Trucl{ Parts
Standard Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline
John W. Stang Corp., Pump Parts
Starow Steel, Steel
Supelco, Inc., Lab Supplies
J. Wayne Sylvester, CASA Meeting Expense
T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Tractor Parts
Tardif Sheet Metal, Aluminum
Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage (2 Months)
Tony's Lock & Safe Service, Hardware
Thomas L. Torres Trucking, Freight
Transport Clearings, Freight
Harry Twining, Employee Mileage
U.S. Equipment Co., Inc., Compressor Parts
Union Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline
Union Sign Co., Signs
United States Helium, Lab Supplies
United Technology Center, Pipe
VTN, Reproduction of Plans
Vaniman Camera, Photo Supplies & Services
John R. Waples R.S., Odor Consultant
Robert A. Webber, Employee Mileage & CWPCA Conf. Exp.
Western Salt Co., Salt.for Conditioners
Russ Wold, Employee Mileage
World Travel Bureau, Inco, Meeting Travel Expenses
Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage·
Xerox Corp., Reproduction Service
Everett H. York Co., Filters
Zodiac Paper Co., Printing Supplies
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Ace Automotive Equipment Co., Shop Equipment $
Carollo & Keith, Survey I-8
John Carollo Engineers, Engineering -Plant Constr.
County of Orange, Compaction Test I-8
E.ToI. & Kordick, Contractor P2-ll-l
Fletcher Jones Chevrolet, Hydraulic Crane & Truck
Healy Tibbitts Construction Co., Contractor I-7-3
Jo Putnam Henck, Contractor P2-17
J.E. Hoagland & W.W. Hoagland, Contractor P2-19
Howard Supply Company, Steam Cleaner ·
City of Huntington Beach, Crossing Guard I-8
Kordick & Rados, Contractor I-8
B.H. Miller Construction Co., Contr. J-7-2/J-12
Nuclear-Chicago, Test Equipment
Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Pipe Testing I-8
Twining Laboratories, Testing I-8
F.T. Ziebarth Company, Inc., Contractor Pl-3-1,
Pl-1R-l/P2-1R-l
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF
A-3
$
$
AMOUNT
610.00
71002
Jrr,r::: C:7 -re.._.) • u .l
l,695o5CS
366098
862.66
135019
61.75
llo03
158076
50.22
13.60
4.98
17023
16.20
1,047.38
16.87
115.31
273.79
659.93
38000
217.21
213.00
178.40·
64.05
77.28
201.76
78.66
1,302.79
137.88
183.01
75,810.61
1,992.00
6,250.00
41,206.33
l~ll. 40
77,364.00
10,023.20
15,387.62
23,290.80
22,868.80
1,392.50
183.15
52L~, 927. 34
67,270.43
631.69
2,018.75
13.90
7,313.00
80?,544.91
878,355.52
DISTRICT NO. 2
WARRANT NO.
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
18 7
~
18038
18039
18040 .
Freedom Newspapers, Inc., EIS Hearing Notice 2-14-1
DISTRICT NO. 3
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Merco Construction Engineers, Inc., Contractor 3-16
DISTRICT NO. 5
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN J:i,AVOR OF
City of Newport Beach, Connection Collection Fee
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6
SUSPENSE FUND WARR.l\NTS
IN FAVOR OF
Sh~irman-Simpson, Engineering 5-19
-I?-
AMOUNT
$ 137.92
$ 46,889.49
560.00
WARRANT NO.
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
18043
18044
18045
18046
18047
18048
18049
18050
18051
18052
18053
18054
~oyle Engineering, Engineering Service AoDo #9
Orange City N~ws, Bid Notice A.Do #9
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND ·wARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Design Services 7-5-lR
CONSTRUCTION FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Ao T. & S. F. Railway Co., Crossing Insp. 7-6-4
Boyle Engineering, 'Survey 7-6-3 & 7-6-4
Colich Cons true t1on Co.'· Contractor 7-6-3
County of Orange, Compaction Testing 7-6-3 & 7-6-4
Northern Contracting Co., Contractor 7-6-4
Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Pipe Testing 7-6-3
DISTRICTS NOS. 1 & 7
SUSPENSE FUND vlARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
County of Orange, Compaction Testing 7-6-2
Mike Masanovich Construction Co., Inc., Contr. 1-12
Ernest E. Pestana, Inc., Contractor 7-6-2
Southern California Edison Co., Grant of Easement 7-6-1
Sully Miller Contracting Co., Contractor 7-6-1
-C-
$
$
AMOUNT
4,019.54
94.43
4,113.97
7,399.50
$ 451.58
1,635.50
189,084.69
426.30
80,392.82
1,375.00
$ 273,365.89
$ 284,879.36
$ 51.25
25,907.40
94,353.50
1,224.oo
1,960.00
$ 123,496.15
HESOLUTION NO. 72-71
APPROVING 'PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
INFLUEET i•IE'rERING & DIVEB_E.ION srrRUCTUPE
AT RECLAifiATION PLAN1l1 NO. 1
A RESOLUTION OF TF.i.E BOAPJJS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS nos 0 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND ·SPECIFICATIONS
FOR I:'WLUENT METERING & DIVERSION STRUCTURE
AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NOo I-8-3
* * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Noso 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND OIIDER:
Section l~ That the detailed plans, specifications and
contract docwnents,this day submitted to the Boards of Directors
by John Carollo Engineers for construction of Influent Metering
& Diversion Structure at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. I-8-3,
are hereby approved and adopted; and,
Section 2o That the Secretary be authorized and directed
to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions
of the Health and Safety Code of the State of Ca~ifornia; and,
Section 3. Th.at the General Manager be authorized to establish
bid date, conditioned on assurance of receipt of a. combined state and
federal grant offer, at which time they will be publicly opened and
read; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts'
Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards
of Directors; and,
Section 5. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby
authorized to award contra.ct for said work on behalf of these
Boards of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1972.
Agenda Item #17\a) -D-All Districts
RESOLUTION KO. 72-72
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
ADDITIONAL SECONDARY TREATMENT AT
RECLAMATION PLANT ITO. 1 AND WATER REUSE
FACILITIES AT PLAUT NO. 2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR ADDITIONAL SECONDARY TREATMENT AT
RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. Pl-9-1, AND
WATER REUSE FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. ·2,
JOB NO. J-4-1
* * ~ * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and
contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors
by John Carollo Engineers for construction of Additional Secondary
Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-9-1, and Water
Reuse Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-4-1, are
hereby approved and adopted; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed
to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions
of the Health and Safety.Code of the State of California; ~d,
Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish
bid date, conditioned on assurance of receipt of a combined state and
fe~eral grant offer, at which time they will be publicly opened and
read; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards· and the Districts'
Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards
of Directors; and,
Section 5. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby
authorized to award contract for said work on behalf of these
Boards of Directors.·
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held Ms.y 10, 1972.
Agenda Item #17(b) -E-All Districts
RESOLUTION NO. 72-73
APrnovrr-:G PLAlYS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
DIGESTEHS H & 0 AT PLANT no. 2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOAHDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTHICTS NOS o 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFOR!:UA, APPROVING PL..£\.NS AHD SPECIFICATIONS
FOR DIGESTERS N & 0 AT PLANT NO~ 2, JOB NO.
P2-21
* * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation DistriGts
Naso 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and
contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors
by John Carollo Engineers for construction of Digesters N & 0 at
Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-21, are hereby approved and adopted; and,
Section 2" That the Secretary be authorized and directed
to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions
of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; &~d,
Section 3. That the Genera1·~1anager be authorized to establish
bid date, conditioned on assurance of receipt of a combined state and
federal grant offer, at which time they will be publicly opened and
read; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts'
Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the.Boards
of Directors; and,
Section 5. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby
authorized to award contra.ct for said work on behalf of these
Boards of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED a.ta regular meeting held May 10,.1972.
Agenda Item #17(c) -F-All Districts
RESOLUTION NO. 72-74
APPTIO"VII'TG PLATTS Arm SPECIFICATIONS FOR
SHOPS AND WAREHOUSE FACILITIES
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITA'l'ION DISTRICTS NOS o 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORAHGE COUW.rY,
CALIFORIJIA, APPROVING PLANS AND· SPECIFICATIONS
FOR SHOPS AND WAREHOUSE FACILITIES, JOB
NO. J-13
* * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Noso 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
DO IIBREBY RESOLVE, DETEru·1Il\TE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and
contract docQ~ents,this day submitted to the Boards of Directors
by John Carollo Engineers for construction of Shops and
Warehouse Facilities, Job No. J-13, are hereby approved and
adopted; and,
Section 2v That the Secretary be authorized and directed
to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions .
of the Health and Safety Code of the Si:!ate of Ca~ifornia; and,
Section 3. That the General .t-.'lanager be authorized to establish
bid date, conditioned on assurance of receipt of a combined state and
federal grant offer, at which time they will be publicly opened and
read; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts'
..
Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards
of Directors; and,
Section 5. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby
authorized to award contract for said work on behalf of these
Boards of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1972.
Agenda Item #17(d) -G-All Districts
RESOLUTION NO. 72-75
ACCEPTING JOB NO. I-7-3 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF.DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA,_ACCEPTING JOB NO. I~7-3 AS
COMPLETE
****-X-***
The Bqards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Healy Tibbitts Construction
Company, has compl'eted the construction in accordance with the
terms of the contract for the Pump Station and Additions to
Bypass Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. I-7-3, on April 14,
1972; and,
Section 2. 'That by letter, John Carollo Engineers, District! s
engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been
completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has
concurred in said engineers' recommendation, which said recommenda-
tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That the Pµmp Station and Additions to Bypass
Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. I-7-3, is hereby accepted as
completed in accordance with the terms of th~ contract therefor,
dated the 14th day of July, 1971; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby
authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1972.
Agenda Item #17(e) -H-. All Districts
cou;ny SA:aTATio:~ DISTRICTS or: OR:\~:GE cou~;ry
P. O. Box 3127 -108~4 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CJV\NGE ORDER
c.o. ~o. ,,
co;~TRACT011: ~~-----~~--~~~-DATE qa'.' 10 1072
l~euodcl Scdincntation l~a.sins 3 f, 4 at Plant ~:o. 1, Job ;~o. Pl-li~-1
J 0 ~: ___ R_e_:~_o_d_c_l __ s_·c_(_i1_·r_~L_~1~1t_~_1_t_i_0~n· __ J~~~s~i~n~s---...\~·--J~)_(~1_(~=----~~t--P~l~~~i1~t---:.~·o~,"--=2~,--.,;'~ro~1~,)~:;~o~,--=-P~~--~l~!{~-~l--~---
~
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (:Ut.l:tUc.1::X $ 377 o~
In· accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the
contract and/or contract work are hereby authorizc<l and as conpensation
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are
here by approved. . ..
REFERENCE: District's Letter dated r.1arc1l 30, 1972
Contractor's Letter dated :iarch 24, 1972
ADD
Sandblast and epoxy plaster eroded weir watls at
Sedimentation Basin :~o. 4
For de lays due to. co~apl ianc e \d th operational
requirenents the Contractor is l1ercby granted
an extension of Contract time of 35 calendar
days.
ADD
TOTAL ADD
377.00
$ 3 7 7, O'O
TOTAL TDIE E;(TENSIO~~ 35 calen<lar davs
SLJI.L-.{.\RY: ·
Original Coatract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Conpletion Date
T irae Ext ens ion C. 0. ffl
Time Extension this C.O.
Revise<l Contract Tine
n.evise<l Coltlpletion Date
February 13, "1971
390 calendar <lays
?larch 9, 1972
20 calendar.days
35 calendar days
445 calendar <lays
~ta y 3, 19 7 Z ·
Original Contract Price $ 249,700.00
~
Board authorization date:
:.fa)" 10 ' 19 7 2
Jam~ CAROLLO E:~G I ?·JEERS
By
-Agenda Item #17(f)
Prev •. Au th. Changes $ 6,545.50
This Change (ADD)~DEDHCIJ $ 377.00
Amended
-I-
Contract Price s 256,622.5()
Approved:
COUXTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
F. T. Z I Ei>.\ffflI. Cff".IPA?.JY
All Districts
RESOLUTION NO. 72-76
ACCEPTING JOB NO. Pl-lR-1 & P2-1R-l
AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 & 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING JOB NO. Pl-lR-1 & P2-1R-l AS
COMPLETE
* * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:.
Section 1. That the contractor, F. T. Ziebarth Company,
has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of
the contract to Remodel Sedimentation Basins 3 & 4 at Plant No .
..
l, Job No. Pl-lR-1 and Remodel Sedimentation Basins A, B & C at
Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-1R-l, on May 3, 1972; and,
Section 2. That by letter, John Carollo Engineers, District's
engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been
completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has
concurred in said engineers' recommendation, ~hich said recommenda-
tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That Remodeling of Sedimentation Basins 3 & 4 at
Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-lR-1 and Remodeling of Sedimentation Basins
A, B & c at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-1R-l, is hereby accepted as
completed :in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor,
dated th~ 13th day of February, 1971; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby
authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1972.
~~enda Item #17(g) -J-All Districts
ADDENDUM NO. 1
to
Specifications and Plans for
POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT
at
PLANT NO. 2
JOB NO. P2-20
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRJCTS ·
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A. GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. Page GP-1, Section l; NOTICE. INVITING BIDS, FEDERALLY
ASSISTED PROJECT.
Change the first paragraph to reacl as follows:
"Sealed proposals will be received at the office
of the Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1
at 10844 Ellis Avenue (mailing address: P. 0. Box
8127), Fountain Valley, California, 92708, on or
before the 15th day of June ·, 1972, at 11:00
_a. n1. , at which tin1.e they will be publicly opened and
read in the office of the Board of Directors at 10844
Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California, for:
POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT
AT PLANT NO. 2
JOB NO. P2-20 tr
Bo DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Page 34-5, Section 34-11; SLUDGE AND HOT WATER TEM-
PERATURE CONTROLLER.S. .
Add the following sentence to the thir~ paragraph of subsection
(2): .
11.Tubing will be an average 15 feet and a maxi1num of
25 feet in length for each unit. 11
Agenda Item #17(h) K-1 All Districts
ADDENDUM NO. 1 -. Job No. P2-20 Page 2 of 2
C. PLANS
1. Drawing No. E-4
Circuit No. AB407 is shown to be a new circuit. Change ~o
show as an existing circuit.
All main circuit tie b~eakers are air break draw out type.
Acenda Item #17(h) K-2
JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS
Howard M. Way
CE 15636
All Districts
C 0 U: ~ ~· Y S :\: H T . .\Ti C: ; D I ST ; . I Ci. S l) r: 0 .' . .', ~ : ~: E C C 1J : : TY
P. O. Box 3127 -100-+·i ::llis :\venue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CllA~~GE O:UJI:R c.o. ~o. .)
co:~TRACTOR: B. II. .: ~ILLEJ: co::~;Tl:t;CT In~; ClLP,"L;y DATE ~: :-~-\·_l_(_) _l_'_J_7_~-----
A<lri~inistra t ion-Lai~L1ccr in~~ Juildin~~ .·\li1.titiun, .Job :~o. J-7-2 li
JOB: Vel1iclc :~~intcnancc Facilities, Job :;6. J-12
Amount of th i's Change Order (ADD) ('D.1:DlJC!K)C $ 7 ,8~1. 36
In accord an cc \d th contra c t prov is ions , th c f o 11 owing ch an g es in the
. contract and/or contract h·ork arc hereby authorized and as compensation
th c r cf or , the f o 11ow1 n g a <l d it ions to or d ·c <l u c-t ions ·fro rn th c contract pr i cc are
here by approved. . ..
REFERENCES:
Districts ' corr cs T) on den c e d ~ t e <l : ~ o v : 13 , 1 9 71 , t l~ b l'"" 197., ·i. " lll7"J \' 8 107'7 e • ~, ... , .• ar. v, ~P ~, .13.r. , .,. ... ,
Apr. 10, 1972, Apr. 17, 1972, Apr. 27, 1972 (2),
;\pr. 28, 1972
Contractor ' s c or r c s 1) on d c n c e <lat c cl : Jan • 2 3 , 1 9 7 2 ,
aa r. 2' 10 7 2 , j !a r. 3, l 9 7 2' .. ia r . 7 , l 9 7 2 ' : la r. 2 9' -
1972, Apr. 7, 1972, Apr. 21, 1972 (2)
Contractor's Change Order Esti1'.1ates: :'fos. 9, 10 fi 11
J-7-2 -Apr. 20, 1972
St re ec h E 1 cc tr i c Co . . In vo i cc : :Jo . A 2 3 6 613 -~.Ia r • 31 , 1 9 7 2
Drawings:· Sheet E-1, Rev. 2 of J-2
~'licrotron :'lovable Partition Shop Drai.dngs
ADD
Install on Force Account 3,000 lineal feet of
500 I·iG! cable in con<lui t to proviJe new power
supply to laboratory 1uuilding at Plant :fo. 1
.Movable partitions at A<lrninistration,-
En(T ineer incr Bui ldin·:r 0 0 0
Door at Room 202
Widen door at storage
Rework fascia
Change Doors Nos. 4, 5 and 19 from pain~
grade to walnut
Agenda Item #17(i) L-1
Add $6,535.71
.\dd 642.35
Add 256.45
Add 32.20
Add 143.75
Add 230.40
TOTAL ADD $7,891.36
All Districts
\.. \..' L;. ~ 1 l .::>; \.. ' 1 L \ l 1 L'.' lJ l 0 l ; , 1 L ! .J U ! · U .:-~ L .. ; L ~ ~ .. n.J" L l
P.O. Box 3127 -100-+4 Ellis ,\venue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
ClIA~~GE OlWER
C • O • ~..: O • 3 ( c on t i :1 :.1 e d )
DATE ~-~-~-;· __ l_P-,--,-r~-~-~--~~~
...\(.bJinistratio11-En~~inccri11g BuilJin~~ :\c..i<lition, Job ::o .. J-7-~
JOB: ________ ~a~n~ci--!.V~c~h~i~c~l~c~.~;~~11~·r~1t~c~~il~~:1~c~c~i=~~~c~i~l~iut~i~c~'r~)~•~·~Tol.L.o.!.1 1__...·;~o---~.I~-~1-~ ______ ~----~~--~--
EXTP.:sro:'l OF co:ffll\CC TI! IE
In or<ler to acconplish the above chanc;cs the
Contractor is hereby granteJ an extension of
contract time of 30 calendar days.
SLJI'I:.1r\RY or-co:~r;~~\CT TI: m:
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
. Time Ex tens ion C. 0. If 2
Ti1'!1e Ex tens ion T:li s Change Or<ler
Total Ex tens ion of Contract Tii.lC
Revis c <l Contract T iriw
Revised Corapletion Date
TOTAL TDIE EXTE?~SION 30 cztl~n<lar days
J-7-2
October 15, 1971
210 calcnJar <lays
~·Iay 12, 1972
03· calenJar days
30 calcntlar d~ys .
93 calendar days
313 calendar days
August 13, 1972
J-12
October 15, 1971
120 calen(iar days
February 12, 1972
63 calendar Jays
30 calendar days
93 calen<lar.days
213 calendar <lays
~ Ia y 1 S , 19 7 2
Original Contract Price $ 477,500.00
Bo'T'rd authorization date:
;.1 a y 1 O , 1 9 7 2 •
\'IILLLU·I P. FICKER AIA
By
Agenda Item #17(i)
Prev. Au th • . Chancres b $ 3,732.11
This Change (ADD) fRP.mu;.:rJ $ 7,391.36
Amended
L-2
Contract Price s .. i89,173.47
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By ____ ~~--~--~--~~----------~-C }u e f Engince . .
13. H. :aLLER c.m~STRUCTI.O:~ Cm!PA:~y
All Districts
M E M 0 R A N D U M
COUNTY SANITATION DiSTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
May 1, 1972
TO: Paul G. Brown
FROM: Robert A. Webber
SUBJECT: Reclaimed Water Charges, Other Agencies
As per your request the following information on reclaimed water has been
gathered from the individual agencies. Although the information was
supplied by the agencies concerned, only approximate volumes and charges
were quoted, however, the data appears to be accurate.
Moulton Niguel Water District
Currently, Moulton Niguel Water District is supplying approximately
0.200 mgd (during winter months) and 1.250 mgd (during summer months)
to Mission Viejo Golf Course. Current agreement is as such:
$1.00 per acre foot ($3.07 per million gallons) for the
first 350 acre feet (114.100 million gallons).
Use above this amount charged at regular irrigation water rate of
$59 per acre foot ($181 per million gallons). Average T.D.S. concen-
trations in reclaimed water 900 to 1100 mg/l, average approximately
1000 mg/l. .
District currently under negotiation with El Niguel Golf Course and
anticipates supplying same with similar amounts of water. District ·
was required to construct chlorination facilities and an additional
pump station in the amount of $110,000. Retail price to El Niguel
Golf Course is expected to be somewhat higher than that char~ed to
Mission Viejo Golf Course due to th~s necessary capital expenditure.
As the treatment plant that will be supplying El Niguel Golf Course
has a greater number of home regenerative water softeners, T.D.S.
concentrations will be slightly higher to El Niguel Golf Course.
Los Alisos Water District
District currently supplying approximately 0.500 mgd of reclaimed
water to Irvine Company, with no charges aoplied for this w~ter. The
District has recently spent approximately $65,000 for an additional
force main and pump station to supply this water. D~strict feels that
having a location to dispose of effluent is compensation enough. Aver-
age T.D.S. concentration is 1050 mg/l.
Agenda Item #19 M-1 All Districts
Memorandum
~· To: _
From:
Paul G. Brown .
Robert A. Webber
May 1, 1972
Subject: Reclaimed Water Charges, Other Agencies
Irvine Ranch Water District.
District has been supplying considerable.amount of reclaimed water
to the Irvine Company for the past.few years. Due to reciprocal
in-house agreements, no charges have been levied on the Irvine
Company. District currently has three potential prospects for
reclaimed water with cu~rent selling price anticipated at $39.60
per acre foot ($121.57 per million gallons). Average T.D.S.
concentration is 1000 to 1100 mg/l.
Los Virgines Hater District
Unconfirmed information states that Los Virgines Water District is
supplying reclaimed water at $15 per acre foot ($46.05 per million
gallons). T.D.S. concentratlons unknown.
City of San Clemente
During summer months, the City treatment plant delivers approximately
0.500 mgd of reclaimed water to the city-owned golf course. Although
no particular charge is l~vied, I am sure there is an accounting
transfer somewhere within the City financial structureo The City
relates that should someone seek to purchase the reclaimed water the
cost would be 1/2 that of domestic water. T.D.S. concentration, 900
to 1100 mg/l.
Rossmoor Sanitation Com0any
The Company in the past has delivered as much as 0.500 mgd of reclaimed
water to Lion Country Safari. Although a cost for water delivered to
Lion Country Safari was discussed, unofficial sources relate that the
agreement was never consummated.
The majority of the reclaimed water is supplied for golf course irri-
gation at Rossmoor and any excess water available is given to Lion
Country Safari. Approximate T.D.S. concentrations at 1050 mg/1.
County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County
Whittier Narrows -The Districts currently supply approximately 15 mgd to the Central and West Basin Water Replenishment District
for ground water recharge. Reclaimed water is blended with Colorado
River water and spread along the Rio Hondo and San Gabriel River.
Selling price at approximately $22 per·acre foot ($67.50 per million
gallons). T.D.S. concentration is 600 mg/l.
-2-
M-2 All Districts
'--1 Memorandum Ma.y 1, 1972
To: Paul G. Brown
From: Robert A. Webber
Subject: Reclaimed Water Charges, Other Agencies
City of Pomona -Districts curr~ntly delivering approximately
2 mgd of reclaimed water to City of Pomona for industrial and
agricultural use. Selling price at approximately $7 per acre
foot ($21.50 per mill±on gallons). T.D.S. concentration is
600 mg/l.
City of Lon~ Beach -Districts have 6 to 12 mgd reclaimed water
from the Long beach Renovation Plant available to the City of
Long Beach. There are no charges levied for this water. Approxi-
mate T.D.S. concentration is Boo to 1000 mg/1.
Agenda Item #19 M-3 All Districts
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into as of the
P~--;.~I.SEu DRAFT
3-30-72
day of
1972, by and. between ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRIC.T, hereinafter
referred to as "Water District" and COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1,
of Orange County, for itself and as agent for County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, hereinafter
referred to as "Sanit~tion District".
RECITALS:
A. Water. District is· a public corporation created and governed
by the Orange County Water District Act (Uncodified Act 5683, Stats.
1933 CH 924, as amended).
B. Sanitation District is a public corporation organized
pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act (Chapter 3, Part 3,
Division V of the Health and Safety Code) and is a party to the Joint
Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement dated March 10, 1971
between its elf and County Sani ta ti on Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6"·, 7, .
and 11, and amendments thereto.
C. Water District is authorized to acquire, construct, operate
and maintain facilities necessary to augment and protect the quantity
and quality of the water supplies within its boundaries.
D. Sanitation District is authorized to construct, maintain,
·and operate such works as may be necessary to conserve and put to
beneficial use any water or sewage effluent recovered from the opera-
tion of their sewage plant or works by discharging the water or sewage
effluent in such a manner as to percolate into the underground gravel
and replenish the natural water resources.
E. Sanitation District has heretofore adopted Resolution No.
971 encouraging the reclamation of waste water originating in Orange
County and providing for delivery of said waste water for said
purpose.
Agenda Item #19 N-1 All Districts
F. Water District has determined that it is feasible to recla:im
said waste water, if the reclaimed w~ter is mixed with desalted sea
or brackish water, for use in its Coastal Project which is ·necessary
to augment and conserve the water supplies within Water District.
Water District intends to construct a waste water reclamation plant
(hereinafter referred to as "reclamation plant") and a desalting
plant on its property located at Ward Street and Ellis.Avenue in the
City·of Fountain Valley, adjacent to Treatment Plant No. 1 of
Sanitation District for said purpose.
G. Each of the parties hereto are authorized to contract with
~ach other to carry out their respective powers,. authority, and
purposes.
H. It is to the best interests of Water District and Sani-
tation District to enter into an agreement to utilize the waste water
from within the respective Districts in Orange County for reclamation
and use in the Coastal Project of Water District and to provide for
disposal of the waste brine discharge from Water District's desalting
plant.
AGREEMENTS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, covenants and
conditions herein contained, the parties hereto do hereby agree as
follows:
1. Delivery of Waste Water
Sanitation District shall deliver to Water District on a
continuous ~asis, except for Acts of God or other emergencies, for
use in its reclamation plant and Water District shall accept delivery
of waste water at no charge from Sanitation Districts' Treatment
Plant No. 1 at a rate of 15 million gallons per day from the effective
date hereof to July 1, 19769 Subsequent to July 1, 1976 Water
District shall pay to Sanitatlon District a charge per million
gallons equal to the economic value, if any, of secondary treated
waste water as determined by the average delivered value of equivalent
waste water processed by all other facilities within the Santa Ana
Agenda Item f/19 N-2 All Districts
River Regional Quality Control Board jurisdiction. Said charge shall
be adjusted annually on July 1 on the basis of the ratio of the deter-
mined value as of July 1, 1976 and the average value for each sub-
sequent year.
2. Quality of Waste Water
The waste water delivered pursuant hereto shall be waste water
which has received secondary: treatment by means of high rate
biological filtration or equivalent treatment.
3. Discharge of Desalting Plant
Sanitation District will receive into i~s disposal facilities
~he waste brine discharged by Water District from its desalting plant
at a rate not to exceed 15 million gallons per day or the simul.taneous
rate waste water is received by Water District from Sanitation District, ..
provided however, that if Wa~er District finds it necessary to exceed
said simultaneous rate it shall pay to Sanitation· District, during
the period from the effective date hereof to July 1, 1976, an amount
equal to $30.00 per million gallons per day for such excess discharge
for each day said simultaneous rate is exceeded. Subsequent to July 1,
1976, said charge shall be adjusted annually on the basis of the ratio
the then current Engineering News Record Index for Los Angeles bears
to the April, 1971 Index of 1550.
After 1990, the amount of waste brine discharged shall at no
time exceed fifty percent (50%) of waste water delivered to Water
District by Sanitation District.
4. Discharge of Reclamation Plant Waste by Water District
Sanitation District does hereby grant to' Water District the
right to discharge its normal sewage and incidental waste as well as
the waste from operation of the reclamation plant into the trans-
mission or disposal facilities of Sanitation District in a manner and·
in locations approved by Sanitation Distrj~ct. Said discharge to
transmission facj_lities of Sanitation District shall not exceed a peak
flow of 100,000 gallons per day~ For the discharge of said sewage
and waste, Water District shall pay to Sanitation District the ·actual
A5enda Item //-19 N-3 All Districts
treatment costs of Sanitation District for the fiscal year in which
said discharge takes place. In the ~vent said discharge exceeds a
peak flow of 100,000 gallons per day, Water District shall.pay to
~· Sanitation District a charge computed at $75.00 per million gallons
discharged. Subsequent to July 1, 1976, said charge shall be
adjusted annually on the basis of the ratio the then current
Engineering News Record Index for Los Angeles bears to. the April.,
1971 Index of 1550. Said charges will be. invoiced and paid annually
not later than October 1 following the end of the preceding fiscal
year. The points of discharge from the plans_and specifications for
~he discharge connection facilities shall be approved by Sanitation
District.
5. Charge for Excess Suspended Solids
In the event the discharge from operation of the reclamation
plant into the facilities of Sanitation District contains a total
amount of suspended solids in any one day in excess of the a.mount of
suspended solids contained in the waste water delivered during the
same day by Sanitation District, Water District shall be subject to
an excess solids charge computed at $17.00 per ton (dry basis) of
such excess suspended solids. Said charge will be applicable to July 1,
1976, and will be invoiced and paid annually not later than October 1
following the end of the preceding fiscal year. Subsequent to July 1,
1976, said charge will be adjusted annually on the basis of the ratio
of the then current Engineering News Record Index for Los Angeles to
an Index of 1300. Said charge may also be adjusted after commencement
of said dis.charge by Sanitation District in the event the cost of
removal and treatment of suspended solids is determined to be materially
increased by changes required by regulatory agencies having juris-
diction, or otherwise.
6. Quality of ;·re.stes Discharged
The quality of discharge from desalting plant and reclamation
plant shall conform to current applicable quality standards and regu-
lations of Sanitation District, provided however, that the temperature
Ao-enda Item #19 Q
N-L~ All Districts
of the discharge to disposal facilities of Sanitation District shall
not exceed 85 degrees Fahrenheit or such temperature as may be mandated
by regulatory agencies having jurlsdiction, and that the total sus-
pended solids content for any one day ln said discharge does not exceed
the total suspended solids content in the waste water delivered to
Water District during the same day.
7. Water Quality l'·~oni torin~
Water District shall establish ·and maintain a ·water quality
monitoring progr&"Tl for the waste ·water delivered from Sanitation
District and for waste waters discharged by ~'later District to Sani-
~ation District facilities,. Said monitoring program shall be approved
by Sanitation District, subject to changes from time to time caused
by changes in operation of Water District desalting and reclamation
operations or by changes in requirements imposed on Sanitation District
by any regulatory agencies having jurisdiction. Written reports of
the r~sults of said monitoring program shall be submitted by Water
District monthly to Sanitation District, not later than 15 days after
the end of each month.
8. Corrunencement of Delivery and DischGi;rge
The delivery of waste water and discharge of waste brine and
other wastes provided herein shall commence as of the completion of
the construction and commencement of operation of the waste water
reclamation plant and the desalting plant by Water District.
9. Facilities
Facilities for delivery of the waste water by Sanitation
District to. Water District and the waste discharge lines shall be
constructed and operated by Water District at Water District's cost
and expense pursuant to plans and specifications approved in writing
by Sanitation District.· A recording and totalizing meter shall be
installed and properly maintained upon the :iaste· delivery facilities)
waste brine delivery facilities and each of the waste water facilities
from the reclaTUation plant which is capable of mea~uring the flo· .. r
therein, at Water Di~~trict 's cost and expense in accord·ance with
i'·~-5 Al 1 D j_ G t l' j c t ;~
plans, specifications and maintenance procedures approved in writing
by Sanitation District.
10. Right of Way for Facilities
Sanitation Distr~ct shall license Water District to construct
pipelines and one injection well site on property owned by Sanitation
District necessary for the construction, operation and maintenance
of the waste water delivery, .waste discharge and waste .brine discharge,
injection well facilities, including the use of temporary areas for
the construction of said facilities, without cost to Water District.
The location, design, and specifications, of such licensed facilities
~hall be approved by Sanitation District. The expense of any future
relocation of said facilities, if required by Sanitation District,
shall be borne by Water District.
11. Modification Needed to Ueet Discharge Standards
In the event it becomes necessary to modify.any facilities or
treatment processes of Sanitation District to meet the discharge
standards set by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board,
or agency having jurisdiction of such discharge from time to time,
Water District will pay to Sanitation District that portion of the
cost of such modification, which is attributable to Water District's
opexations under this agreement. If modification of Water District's
facilities is necessary to meet such standards, Water District shall
make such modifications and pay the cost thereof.
12. Modification of Treatment Facilities
In the event it is desirable to improve the quality of the waste
water deliv~red by Sanitation District in order for Water District to
reclaim it and the parties hereto agree, Sanitation District will
modify its treatment and appurtenant facilities or processes. Water
District will pay to Sanitation District the actual costs incurred
for said modification.
13. Term
The term of this agreement shall be 30 years from the date hereof.
Agenda Item #19 N-6 All Districts
: f
14. Hold Harmless and Indemnitz
Water District shall, and does hereby, agree to indemnify
Sanitation District against and to hold Sanitation District harmless
from any and all damages, claims of damages or liabilities of whatso-
ever nature arising out of the, or in connection with, Water District's
operations hereunder, including the use of the licenses which may be
granted as provided herein. .
Sanitation District shall, and does .hereby, .agree to indemnify
Water District against and to hold Water District harmless from any
and all damages, claims of damages or liabilities of whatsoever
~ture arising out of, or in connection with, Sanitation District's
operation of its sewage treatment plants and sewage transmission
and outfall facilities.
Water District shall require of each of its contractors, with
whom contracts are made for the construction, operation, maintenance
or repair of facilities to be constructed for the delivery of waste
water and discharge of waste brine and other wastes as provided for
herein, to agree to indemnify and hold harmless Sanitation District
from any damages or claims for damages, including costs and
attorney's fees incurred in defending any such claims, which may arise
out of such contracts· or contractor's activities. Water District
shall further require each of said contractors to provide workmen's
compensation insurance and comprehensive and contractor's liability.
insurance with limits of not less than $500,000 for injury or death
of one person and $1,000,000 for any one occurence and not less than
$500,000 pr.operty damageo Said contractor shall be further required
to cause Sanitation District to be named as an additional insured in
the comprehensive and contractor's liability insurance and to furnish
a certificate of waiver of subrogation under the terms of the work-
men's compensation insurance.
Agenda Item //-19 N-'"( ·All Distrjcts
. ' '
IN WITHESS 1·IBEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
agreement as of the day and year first above written.
Approved as to form:
RUTAN & TUCKER
By _____ G_e_n_e_r_a~l,__C~o-un __ s_e_l ______ __
Approved as to form:
MILLER, NISSON & KOGLER
By
----~G-e_n_e_r_a~l~C~o-un __ s_e~li:--------
Agenda Item #19
ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
By _______________________________ __
President
By __ __,,S_e_c_r_e~t-a_r_y __________________ __
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1,
of Orange County
By __ ~~-:--------==----=------~=----~~ Chairman, Board of Directors
By
------~------~-----~----,-~----Secretary, Board of Directors
N-8 All Districts
~T>L1lala._· richard terry
Ll AND ASSOCIATES
116 Horth Carousel St. Anaheim, Calif. 92806
18 April 1972
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County
P. o. Box 8127
Fountain valley, California 92708
environm.ental
science & services
Tel. ( 714) 630-2930
Subject: Proposal to Prepare Environmental ~mpact Statements
for the County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County
Richard Terry & Associates/Environmental Science & Services
(RT&A/ES&S) is pleased to· submit a proposal to prepare two
Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) for the Districts.
The following is submitted for your consideration.
Part I --Statement of Work
A. Scope of Work
Prepare two EISs for proposed improvements on the
Districts• treatment facilities. One Impact state-
ment will cover only the proposed activated-sludge
facilities; the other will involve several projects,
including booster station and sludge handling f acil-
i ties.
B. Format of Impact Statements
The EISs shall be prepared in accordance with the
state and Federal Environmental Impact Statement
guidelines that are currently available, or in a
modified approved format.
c. Briefinqs and Liaison
1) For the purposes of preparation of the EISs the
Consultant shall be thoroughly briefed about the pro-
posed projects by County Sanitation Districts person-
nel, and all relevant facts shall ~e divulged.
2) A Project Engineer from the Districts shall be
assigned, to act as liaison, to resolve any problem
areas, and with John Carollo Engineers.
3) The Consultant shall interface with the Districts•
design engineers, John Carollo Engineers, cognizant
agencies, such as the Regional Water Quality Control
Board, other State and local officials and agencies,
as required, as part of the effort in preparing the
EISs.
Agenda Item #20 0-1 All Districts
. '
- 2 -
4) Progress reports or progress meetings will be
held periodically, if requested ~y the Districts.
D. Relevant Reoorts and Documents
1) In addition to the oral briefings ·presented by
the Districts and John Carollo Engineers, all rel-
evant docu~ents and reports shall be made available
to the Consultant.
2) All reports, drawings and documents provided to
the Consultant as part of this contract shall be re-
turned to the CSDOC or John Carollo Engineers at the
completion of the contract.
E. Deliverables
.1) ·A preliminary (rough) draft EIS for the activated-
sludge facilities shall be submitted to the Districts
fcir review purposes by 1 July 1972, or earlier. The
second draft EIS shall be submitted for review by 1
August, or earlier. Comments provided by reviewers
shall f orrn the basis for the preparation of the Final
Impact Statement. All problem areas shall be resolved,
insofar as practicable, before typing the Final Impact
Statement. The Fin2.l I~pact St:-atement shall b8 an
approved Rough Draft report.
2) A total of 50 copies· of each EIS shall be submitted
to the Districts. The Final EIS for the activated-
sludge facilities shall be submitted by 1 August, or
earlier, and the second EIS shall be submitted by 1
September,·or earlier.
3) Prior to printing the Final EIS a copy of the
Final EIS shall be submitted to the Districts for
final approval. If the Districts require no more than
a week for review, the deadline will be met. No major
revisions are ant~cipated during this final approval/
review process.
4) The Districts shall make. available to the Consultant
reproducables of any drawings, maps, or other material to
be used in the Final Impact Statements.'
Part II --Terms and Conditions
A. Richard Terry & Associates/Environmental Science &
Services acts as an independent contractor rendering
professional services. R'r&J°\/ES&S, or its agents, will
not hold the Districts or the county of orange liable
for any injuries incurred as· a result.of providing
professional service~ under the terms of this contract.
Agenda Item #20 0-2 All Districts
.L I
- 3 -
B. work performed shall be based upon the tasks outlined in
Part I of this proposal. The Consultant shall make as
detailed Environmental Impact study as considered
necessary to fullfull the requirements. of the state and
Federal governments.
c. The consultant shall not be penalized for any significant
delays resulting from changes in engineering plans,
Environmental statement guidelines, or changes in the
State, Federal or local regulations.
D. The Consultant shall not be penalized for delays that are
beyond his control.
E. under the terms of this contract the Consultant shall be
reimbursed for any work performed. work on this contract
shall be considered complete when the Final EISs have
been submitted to the Districts. Any additional work
after the EISs have been submitted shall be at the same
rate as the basic contract.
F. RT&A/ES&S proposes to perform professional services on
a per diem basis. The rates are as follows:
Dr. R. n. Terry In-town/in-office
out-of-town
Air Pollution/meteorologist
Ecoriomist (Ecolomist)
Civil/sanitary Engineer
Marine Biologist/Ecologist
Technical (Engr.) Assistant
secretary
Estimated Expenses for Proposed work
Preparation of Final EISs
Photocopy work
collation
covers
Binding
Graphics
Reproduction of dwrs., maps etc.
Other Misc. Expenses
xerography
Photography
Misc. office expenses
$280/day
320/day
320/day
300/day
150/day
150/day
.80/day
40/day
$200
70
40
30
100
60
$500
$150
20
125
$245
Agenda Item #2v 0-3 All Districts
\ \
4 -
Travel
2 trips to John Carollo Eng~neers
1 trip to Sacramento
Local travel
Total expenses are estimated as $1115.00.
$150
70
150
$370
G. The maximum cost to prepare the two Environmental Impact
Statements shall not exceed $8,500.00 without further
authorization, including expenses.
H. The Consultant, RT&A/ES&S, shall bill the District on
actual work performed, based upon a per diem basis, includ-
ing expenses (and travel). The Consultant shall bill the
Districts monthly.
I. Work on the environmental reports can be started by RT&A/
ES&S as soon as notified in writing by the Districts.
Yours truly,
Richard Terry & Associates/
Environmental Scien_c:e & Services <;;: __ . __
-. .) . .
... ··-~"---·'/ .-/ .', . ~ . Ri~1~~r~: . e~~ .
Executive irector
RDT/f j
Agenda. Item .f/2CJ O·-h All Districts
SUPERVISOR, FIFTH DISTRICT
RONALD \V. CASPERS
CHAIRMAN, ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ORANGE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
!515 NORTH SYCAMORE. P. 0. BOX 687. SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702
PHONE: 834-3550 <AREA CODE 714>
April 18, 1972
Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Gentlemen:
.
By Resolution No. 72-287, the Orange County Board of Supervisors adopted
the in~lementation program for the Santa Ana River-Santiago Creek Green-
belt Plan, copy of which was previously sent to you.
Your appointee to the greenbelt ad hoc cormnittee, Fred Harper, participated
in the preparation of this program.
As an important jurisdiction i11 the river cOJ:ridor, your Board is requested
to adopt the program, by resolution.
Implementation of the Greenbelt Plan will produce an incomparable open space
asset for all citizens of Orange County, in this and subsequent generations.
Your cooperation is earnestly solicited.
Cordially,
1l?J/a-1~
Ronald W. Caspers
Chairman
Orange County Board of Supervisors
RWC/CRS/ld
Agenda. Item #21 p All Districts
. -,
COMMISSION
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA·
COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT
1100 GLENDON AVENUE LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90024 • (213) 478-0808
BERT BO~D. PRFSIO(NT
May 5, 1972
LINOSl.EY PAPS01'.S, 'dCE P"<E'llOP<T
HEl.EN COBB
THOMAS C:. l.AUE!ACHER
L. E. TIMBERLAKE
PROJECT MANAGER
GEORGE: E. HLAVKA P11 0. TO: THE JOINT BOARDS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY
SANITA~ION DISTRICTS CONSUL TING BOARD
PAO,, JOHN 0 IS.AACS. C><••« .. ,.N
RICHARD K C LEE. !<A D
ERMAN A. PEARSO~~-SC 0
DONALD W. PRITCHAPD Pt< D.
.JOHN H. RYTHER. P><.0
FROM: LINDSLEY PARSONS, COl·iMISSIONER, SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT
·RE: PROPOSAL BY STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL
BOARD TO PARTICIPATE IN PROJECT MANAGEr.ffiNT
AND FUNDING
·At a special meeting of the SCCWRP Corrunission held on
May 3, 1972, the Cornmission m1anirnously adopted a motion
instructing the President of the Commission and/or a
member of the Commission to meet and discuss with State
Water Resources Control Board representatives the proposal
of the State Board to participate in the management and
funding of the SCCHRPA project, as outlined in the attached
letter.
Bert Bond, President of the Cormnission, has requested that
your representative be a member of the SCGWRPA Committee
to take part in the discussions with the State Board in an
effort to work out an agreement for participation and fund-
ing which could be recommended to the sponsoring agencies.
The State Board proposal that a "Project Control Group" be
established to direct the activities of the project was not
considered to be acceptable by the Commission, since the
sponsors, who to date have committed themselves to an in-
vestment of $1,700,000 in the furtherance_ of its objectives,
would have only one member with a minority voice on the
<control group. The other two members would be appointed
by the EPA and the State Board.
It was conceded, however, that the larger agencies, which
may in time take over the entire funding of the project,
should be entitled to some voice in the direction of its
activities.
\
Ap:enda Item #22 Q-1 All Districtn
.. '
May 5, 1972
Page 2
It was my suggestion that the Joint Powers Agreement
might be amended to p~rmit a larger Commission member-
ship, with from two to four additional Commissioners to
be appointed by the State Board and the EPA, leaving the
majority of the Commission memberships in the hands of ·
the present sponsoring agencies. This proposal was
generally agreed to be a possible solution, however, I
would not recommend advancing the suggestion to the State
Board officials until preliminary discussions have taken
place, and we have arrived at some tentative dollar figures
concerning the extent of support offered, and we have
ascertained the measure of policy control required by the
federal and state agencies.
President Bond has requested that each Commissioner should
get an up-to-the-minute reading from each of the supporting
agencies on its reaction to extensive state and federal
funding, and whether or not enlargement of the Commission
would be an acceptable compromise to the state's proposal
of a rrProject Control Group 11
•
It has always been my opinion that the SCCWRPA studies are
of -statewide and nationwide significance, and that the
major share of the costs should be borne.by the larger
government agencies. I am sure that I have had the support
of the Orange County Sanitation Districts in my constant
efforts to have the Commission and the staff solicit out-
side funding. As members of the Executive Committee are
aware, I have been ·working on various Washington political
contacts to open up avenues for federal participation.
I would like to be able to state, on behalf of the Joint
Boards, that these districts are in favor of all of the
outside flinding ·we can get, and that the negotiating com-
mittee for the SCCWRPA Commission be authorized to consider
and discuss any reasonable proposals and suggestions for
giving the larger government agencies some voice in the
policy direction of the studies, including consideration of
the possible enlargement of the Commission, as long as
majority control of the Commission r~m~ins in the hands of
the present sponsoring agencies.
Any agreement that might be recommended by the committee and
the Commission would still have to have the unanimous approval
of the sponsoring agencieso
Agenda Item #22 Q-2 All Districts
S'JATE OF CAllFOl?NIA-THE P.!':SOIJRCES AGENCY
~TATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
.....,oOM. 1015, RESOURCES BUILDING
1..C16 NINTH STREET • SACRAMENTO 9.58U
APR 2 5 1972
Mr. Bert Bond, President
Commission
Southern California Coastal Water
Research Project
333 Hermosa
. ·Long Beach, California 90812
Dear Hr .. · Bond:
J.10NAlD RE..A.G.A.N, Govc:-,.,:;r
The Board has followed with interest the Southern California Coastal
Water Research Project since· its inception in 1970. The project has
resulted in infor~ation of considerable value to regulatory aGencies
and other interests, -particularly as regards the· coI!lpleted technical
reports and the data presented by Dr. Hlavka at the Board's public
hearing in San Diego on a policy for discharge to ocean waters.
Last year in correspondence to your Board of Commissioners, we pointed
out the early need for knm·rlede;e of certain oceanographic and biologic
conditions as correlated with or affected by wasteHaters of municipal·
treatment plnnt origin. r,fo stressed that during 1972 and 1973 the
Board must nalce critical decisions in areas of policy and water
quality control planning and that appropriate SCCT.IRP activities
would provide an information base for Board decisions.
The project has undertaken activities that are pertinent to the
Board• s needs 2.nd ·we understand that considerable data has been
obtained in addition to the rc;)orts and nresentation ~1entioned above ..
We also understand fron discussion ·.dth Dr. Hlavka that with uresent
.fUndine;, envisioned project priorities may not allow for assernblage,
interpretation and evaluation of these data in time for their inclu-
sion 1n the final project report for the initial 3-year study period •
. We believe the final renort must contain such information because of
its importance to both the dischargers and regulatory agencies.
We also believe that with the considerable background data now
obtained by· the project, efforts should be intensified to isolate
the effects of waste discharges on narine beneficial uses, to
determine annronriate treat~ent and ciisnosal methods to nrotect
beneficial uses~ and to define appropriate techniques for determin-
..._,. ing changes in beneficial uses as caused ~y Haste discharges.
Agenda Item #22 Q-3 All Distr1cts
Mr. Bert Bond, President -2-·. APR 2 5 1972
Until this time, the Board has participated in the project through
a consultant on the Board of Consul tents. It v10uld a11-pear ad.vanta5eous
~o the project and to the Board if "'de· now assume cl a more direct role
both in project ffianae:;emcnt and funding. He 1·1ill consider fundin5
assistance to the project during the remainder of 1972 and thereafter
for at least 3 years and ·1-:ill recor:-~;iend continuing support by the
Envirormental Protection Asency if a Eanacenent arrangement sinilar
to the one outlined belo·..r is acceptable to the project sponsors and
if the project sponsors continue tne support required to maintain
the project staff.
We propose that a 11 Projcct Control Group 11 be formed of one representa-
tive each from the project sponsors collectively, the Envirollfficntal
Protection Accnc:y and the State Board staff. That three~rr.an tea.;;1 \·iould
···direct the project's technical activities, particularly tm·:ards:
(1) determining cu."1.d evaluating the extent of Hastc\·:ater trcat~:lent
and method of disposal necessary for appropriate \·mter quality
management, (2) developinc; appropriate methods for occanoGraphic
and biologic s~11pling, analy.sis, ai.J.d interpretation, and (3) en-
couraging the pro.jec-c staff to reach definite conclusions as to
cause and effect in the October 1972 final report.
We sue;gest continuonce of a pro,ject Board of Consultants that would:
(1) advise the Project Control Group, (2) assist the project staff
follow Project Control Group directives from a technical sense, arid
(3) review and critique project reports and other docQ~ents.
The project sponsors through their Board of Commissioners \·tould con-
tinue project administrative functions including personnel matL.ers.
We are optimistic that such joint leadership and fundin~ can result
in project activities ai.vid repo::-ts that .. l'lill provide l7~axi1:mm value
to the dischargers, Z?A and the State Board. He \·:ould appreciate
discussing this proposal with the 3oard of Commissioners and project
sponsors and are informing EPA of the proposal by copy of this
letter. ~
Sincerely,
/1;!-(_ t . .6-vA~
Bill B. Dendy ~
Executive.Officer
cc_: Mr. Paul De Falco, Jr.
Agenda Item 1¥22 Q-4 All Districts
CONBllL Tlf\10 CIVIL ENGINEERS
s-s 6080
April 20, 1972
Orange County Sanitation District No. 5
10844 Ellis Avenue
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California
Attention: Mr. Ray E. Lewis
Gentlemen:
In a letter dated October 29, 1971,
. Mr. Harper directed that the relocation of the
existing gravity sewer in the vicinity of Newport
Boulevard be included in Contract No. 5-19 -Sewer
Trunk 11 B 11 Unit 8. We did not include the desi9n
of this relocation in our proposal of August 3,
1971 for the preparation of plans for Contract
No. 5-19.
It is therefore proposed that our fee
for the engineering design services required be a
lump sum of $3,000. The other terms of our pre-
vious proposal would also be applicable to this
additional work;
Please let me know if you have any
questions.
DCS/lm
NEWPORT CENTER OUILDING
359 San Miguel Drive
Newport Beach. Cal1tornia 82660
(714) 644-0563
Agenda Item #30
Very truly yours,
SHUIHMAN-SIMPSO.N
~dc/.?J;;_~
Donald c.· Simpson
-R-Districts 5 & 6
..
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS
s-s 6080
April 20, 1972
Orange County Sanitation District No. 5
10844 Ellis Avenue
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California
Attention: Mr. Ray E. Lewis
Gentlemen:
In accordance with your request we
are preparing plans for the installation of a
liner in the existing v.c.P. sewer on the
southerly side of Pacific Coast Highway and
westerly of Newport Boulevard. The construc-
tion of the liner will be included as a separate
bid item with Contract No. 5-19.
It is proposed that our fee for the
required engineering design services be a lump
sum of $1,500. The other terms contained in
our proposal dated August 3, 1971 for Contract
No. 5-19 would also be applicable to this addi-
tional work.
Please let me know if you have any
questions.
DCS/lm
NEWPORT CENTER BUILOING
359 Ssn Miguel Drive
Newport Beach. Cal1lorrna 92660
(714) 644-0563
Acsenda Item /130 -S-
Very truly yours,
SHUIRMAN-SIMPSON
Donald c. Simpson
Districts 5 & 6
; I
COUI\TY SA~H TXf I O:J DI ST iZ I CT ?W. 2
of Orange Courity, C~lifornia
ADDE~mu: 1 ~rn. 3
to
CONSTRUCTim~ SPECIFIC . .\Tro~·\s AXD PLANS
CONT RAC T 1 W • 2 -14 - 1
Nay 3, 19 7 2
I.. PROPOSAL ·
Bi<l<lcrs a re required to 1 is t the nane s ·of the pipe nanuf ac turer ( s)
who will furnish t;1e rcinforccJ coacrete pipe to !)e usc<l in the
work. If nor c tlwn one Z:-!~nuf ac turer is to !; e us cd, al 1 nanuf ac-
turcr (s) shal 1 be 1 is tccl \·:i th the port ion to be furnished
indicatccL The follm·li11~ list shall be attached to the proposal
when submitted:
PIPE }~~UFACTURER
I I. SCiIEl.JULE OF PiUCES
SIZE
LINEAL FOOTAGL
TO BE FTJTF: I S!I[D
The bid sche<lule for .Alternates ~:oso 1, 2 anJ 3 shall include the
follm:inr; fix cost itcr:s of a<l<litional gravel hitlJing if rcquircJ.
Refer to Section 115 of the lJetaileJ Specifications for further
details.
. .
ITE: 1 ?·:0.
A.
B
A~enda Item #38
APPllOX.
QUA:JT ITY
0 to 500
cubic ytls
0 to 500
cubic yds
Bcdtling ~ravel~ O" to 12"
cori1plcte in place for the
uni.t price per cubic yard
of (<lo not include in
Total Contract Price)
!3ctldin~ g1~avcl, 12" to 24"
comnlctc in nl~cc for the
unit price per cuoic yard
of (c.lo .aot include in
Total Contract Price)
T-1 District 2
UNIT PP-ICE
$ 7.50 -----
s 9. 00 . -----
l I
ADDENDlI'.·1 IW. 1 - . co:nRACT 1:rn. 2-14 -1 Page 2 of 4
ITE:·l !W.
c
APPllOX.
QUA;:T ITY
0 to 500
cubic yds
ITPr
BcJ<ling 'gravel;· 2'1" to 36"
conplcte in place for the
unit price per cubic yard
of (do not i~clutlc in
Total Contract Price)
u:nr PRICE
I I I. STAm)ARD SPEC I I~ I CAT I o;~s
5/3/72
I Section 22
VIHYL PLASTIC Ln!EH. PLATE
Pages 1 through 9 of Section 22 shall be <le.letcd and shall be
subs ti tute<l Hi th the follmving:
22-1 GEl~ERAL
The Contrac.tor shall furnish and install vinyl plastic liner
plate in reinforced concrete pipe and structures as shm\·n on
the plans anJ herein specificu. TI1e purpose of the liner
pla tc is to e ff cc ti vc ly protcc t the cone retc surf~ces to ,.;hich
it is applied fron corrosion, and to accor.iplish this, it is
essential t11~t the liner µlate be continuous anu free fron any
holes, <lefects or other faults, and that any joint Kelding
and seal in~~ t)C equally as ef f cc ti ve as the 1 incr plate.
_ The interior area of-reinforced concrete pipe an<l structures
shall be scaled anJ protectctl 'dth the specified linin~· as
shown on the Plans. 1\ll joints betwcc;i in<li vidual sheets or
sections of liner plates s)iall he continuously heat \·:el<lc<l hy
the use of welding strips of the same kin<l an<l eciuivalent
thickness of natcrial as the liner plates (with the exception
of the integral extension ribs.)
..
All material and l:ork for ancl in connection ,.;i th t:1c furnis11ing
an<l installation of liner plates in rcinforccJ concrete p~pe,
manholes anJ structures anJ the field seal.ii1.; an<l 1·:elJin~ o.f
joints shall :)c done in strict confon:lity ,.;ith a!'Plicable
publishc<l sections of the ST,\:~iJAR~) SPECIFIC,\TIO::s 1-0R PUi>LIC
\VORKS CO:~STlWCTIO:~, 197 0 E<li ti on ar1encled as f olloi.,'s :.
Section 207-3.4.1 Physical ProDerties, p3.~e 132
Adel to the list of chenical solutions -so<liun
hypochloritc at 1%* concentration.
Section 207-3.4.3. Details and Dimensions, uage 133
1. Subparagraph (c) -the first para~raph of this
subsection sh al 1 be change<l to read as f o llo\1'S:
SIIEET MW STl~IP SIZE -Sheets of liner plate
shall be as large as practicable to adequately
Ac;enda Item #J8 T-~ ·District 2
. '
ADDENDU:.1 1~0. 3 -CONTRACT NO. 2-14-1 Page 3 of 4
5/3/72
fit the intended use.
2. Subparagraph (d) -The fifth sentence of the second
paragraph of t!1is subsection shall b·e changed as
underlined below:
lfoep channels which involve the omission of
3 1/2 inches ••••
·3. The fol lm·1ing subparagraph shall be added to this
·section:
(e) STRAP CIL.\;~:JELS m~ EXTRUiJED SIIEETS
All sheets havin~ loc~ing extensions
extruded t11ereon shall have transverse
strap channels cut in the lockinf; ex-
tensions so tl1at ti1e strap can l>e place<l
into an<l pcrpen<licular to the locking
extensions. These channels shall not be
less than 1/2-inch ,~·ide and not nore than
3 I 4 -inc l l ',' i cl c and sh a 11 1u e c u t s o t ~lat a
max i m m.1 of 1 I G 4 -inch o f the bas c o f th c
locking extension is left in the base of
the str~p channel.
Strap channels shall be placed a r.nnir.mm
of 15-inchcs on center to a Ti1axi1au:-.1 of
18-inciies. The strap channels Hill not
be. cut through the two locking ex tens ions
on each side of the set.
There will be no strap channe-ls required
in r.10ulded sets.
Section 207-3.4.4 Testing Rec1uirer:ients, page 135
All sheets to be use<l in reinforced concrete pipe will be
tested at the pipe manufacturers plant as Hell as in the
fiel<l.
Section 207-3.5.4 l 1:·ecu Channels, 'nage 133
T~e first paragraph shall Le changed' to read as follows:
At 8-foot intervals longitu<linally maxinun along
liner plate a gap not less than 2-inches or 3 1/2-
inchcs in the case of C\:truJccl sheets nor nore than
4-inches ,,·icle shall be left. in all locking exten-
sions to provide aQ unobstructeJ transverse weep
channel.. .\nv area behind. liner nlate \·,'hic}1 is not
. properly scrZreJ· oy re~ular \;eep channels' s~1all
have a<l<l it ioaal HCCD char.nc 1 s 2-inches \·:id e pro-
vided by cutting aw~y locking cxtens~o11se Provisions
shall be rn~clc to pernit ,,;ater bchinJ. the liner of
concrete nanhole .shafts to drain into the weep
Agenda Item l38 rr'-3 District 2
ADDE~~1JU:.1 t~O. 3 -CONTRACT ~:o. 2 -14 -1 :Page 4 of 4
5/3/72 ..
channels of the linc<l structure. If a section of
pipe requires uore than one ,,·ec!J channe 1, they sh al 1
be e qui cl i s t an t a par t fr o 1 ~1 t i 1 e c 11 <l s of th c p i p c
section. ~/ccp channels \lill be cut into the extruded
sheet so tiiat a -113.xinw11 of 1/64-inch of the base
locking extension is left on the sheet.
Ae;enda Item #38 T-4 District 2
Mr. Fred Harper
General l-hnager
CALIFORNIA STATE COLLEGE
AT FULLERTON
800 NORTH STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD. FuLLERTON. CALIFORNIA 92631
April 24, 1972
Orange County Sanitation District #3
Dear Mr. Harper:
In reviewing invoice ff72-1-12~ for the previous year, I find that a
sufficient amount of money was not budgeted to cover these costs.
We are on a fiscal year budget (July 1 through June JO). We are
requesting release from the District Board, or an extension for
payment, and also requesting that we be billed July 1, to cover
eighteen months use. Then, thereafter, we should be billed on a
yearly basis.
We would like to also request release from any delinquency charge
that may be added due to lack of paynent.
Any assistance you may be able to give us in this matter is greatly
appreciated.
Very truly yours,
~-,·//~-
B. E Kempton
Chief of ~lant Operation
Agenda Item #39 -U-District 2
RESOLUTION NO. 72-80-2
GRANTING CHANGE IN BILLING PERIOD FOR
CALIFORNIA STATE COLLEGE AT FULLERTON
Arm WAIVING 1971 DELINQUENCY CHAEGE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING
AN INITIAL BILLING PERIOD FOR CALIFORNIA
STATE COLI.EGE AT FULLERTON, WAIVING
DELINQUENCY CHARGE FOR 1971 AND PROVIDING
FOR FISCAL YEAR BILLING PERIOD
* * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, California State College at Fullerton, because of
budgetary restrictions has requested that the initial billing
period for annual use charges be extended, that.delinquency
charges for 1971 calendar year billing period be waived, and that.
subsequent billing periods be on a fiscal year basis; and,
WHEREAS, Article 11, paragraph (b) of the District's Uniform
Connection and Use Ordinance No. 202 provides that the Board of
Directors may by resolution consider a special agreement for
situations requiring special consideration; and,
WHEREAS, California State College at Fullerton, by letter of
April 24, 1972, applied to the Board of Directors for special
consideration;
NOW, THEREFORE·, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED:
Section 1. 'J.1hat said letter from California State College at
Fullerton, dated April 24, 19'""(2, is hereby received and ordered
filed; and,
Section 2. That California State College at Fullerton.Ts initial
billing period for annual use fees; as provided for under Ordinance
No. 202, is hereby extended from the calendar year 1971· to the period
January 1, 1971 through June 30, 1972; and,
Section 3. That delinquency charges for the 1971 calendar
year billing period for California State College at Fullerton are
hereby waived; a11d,
Section 4. That commencing with July·l, '1972, the annual
billing period for California State College at Fullerton shall be
on a fiscal year basis from July through June.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1972.
Agenda Item #39_ -V-District 2
HESOLUTION NO. 72-77-3
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT
FOR CONSOLIDATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
NO. 3, OF OPANGE COUNTY, WITH COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT NO~ 4, OF ORANGE COUNTY, AND AUTHORIZING
THE INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS TO EFFECT SUCH
CONSOLIDATION
WHEREAS, it appear~ that the public interests will be
served by the consolidation of County Sanitation District No. 3,
of Orange County, and County Sanitation District No. 4, of Orange
County; and
WHEREAS, said consolidation will conform to the Interim
Basin Plan of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board,
Santa Ana Region; and
WHEREAS, an agreement for the consolidation of County
Sanitation Districts No. 3 and 4, has been prepared, in which the
City of Seal Beach and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Seal
Beach have undertaken certain duties and obligations,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chairman and
Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 3 be and they are
hereby authorized and directed to execute on behalf of County
Sanitation District No. 3 that certain "Consolidation Agreement",
dated May 10, 1972, by and between County Sanitation District No. 3,
of Orange County, County Sanitation District No. 4, of Orange County,
the City of Seal Beach, California, a Charter city, and The Redevelop-
ment Agency of the City of Seal Beach, a copy of which is attached
hereto and made a part hereof.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretary of County
Sanitation District No. 3 is authorized and directed to perform
all necessary acts to initiate and complete said consolidation
in order to make July 1, 1974 the effective date of said consoli-
dation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the name of the new consoli.-
dated district shall be County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange
County and said district will be located in Orange County, Califo~nia.
Ag~nda Item # 113 W--1 Distr·ict 3
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that preliminary proceedings
'-11 be corrunenced under the provisions of Government Code §56261.1.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1972.
Agenda Item #43 W-2 District 3
CONSOLIDATION AGREEMENT
THIS CONSOLIDATION AGREEMENT is made and entered into this
day of
and
and
and
SANITATION DISTRICT NUMBER FOUR OF
ORANGE COUNTY, hereinafter referred
to as "District Number Four"
SANITATION DISTRICT NUMBER THREE OF
ORANGE COUNTY, hereinafter referred
to as "District Number Three"
THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, a
charter city,·hereinafter referred to
as "City"
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY
OF SEAL BEACH, hereinafter referred
to as "Agency. 11
RECITALS
1. WHEREAS, District Number Four has expressed its willingness
to consolidate with District Number Three as expressed in
Reso1ution 72-1 (Exhibit A), and
2. WHEREAS, District Number Three has expressed its willingness
to consolidate with District Number Four as expressed in its
unanimous intent at its meeting of May 10, 1972, (Exhibit B),
and
3. WHEREAS, City wishes to insure the development within the City
of a sewage system meeting the highest technological standards
and also to conform to the adopted Interim Basin Plan of the
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana
Region, and
4. WHEREAS, Agency wishes to improve the quality and capacity of
sewage treatment and disposal within the project area of said
Agency through the consolidation of District Nurriber Three and
District Number Four, and
5. WHEREAS, In accordance with Government Code Section 56000, et
seq., Districts Three and Four hereby agree to consolidate as
set forth herein.
The parties to this consolidation agreement hereby promise and
agree as follows:
A. The name of the consolidated distri'ct shall be
"Sanitation District Number Three of Orange County."
B. The sewerage system of District Number Four shall be
consolidated with District Number Three at no expense
to District Number Three.
Agenda Item #L~3 X-1 District 3
CONSOLIDATION AGREEMENT Page Two
C. Upon the effective date of this consolidation, all of
the assets including but not limited to property taxes
receivable from the equalization of Orange County
Assessor's Tax Roll and the State Board of Equalization
Tax Roll effective March 1, 1974, and all liabilities
of District Number Four shall become the assets and
liabilities of the consolidated district, and s~id
consolidated district shall assume all of the contractual
obligations of District Number Four including but not
limited to those arising from or incurred bJ virtue of
the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement between City and
District Number Four creating the Seal Beach Administration
Building Authority.
D. The effective.date of consolidation shall be July 1, 197l+.
E. District Number Four represents and agrees that all its
sewerage facilities will be transferred and conveyed to
the City of Seal Beach prior to the effective date of
consolidation.
F. That all unencumbered funds, including cash and receivables
of District Numbe~ Four shall be transferred to and become
the property of District Number Three and shall reduce the
consolidation fee as recited herein by. an amount equal
to that of said unencumbered funds, cash, and receivables
existing as of June 30, 1974.
G. That District Number Four shall pay District Number
Three all operating costs incurred by District Number
Three in treating and disposing of waste water from District
Number Four prior to July 1, 1974.
H. That District Number Three shall assume all costs of
treatment of waste water from District Number Four from
and after the effective date of consolidation.
I. The City is to terminate the lease of certain city hall
facilities by District Number Four reciting an annual
rent of $2,500 upon the effective date of consolidation;
and to hold District Number Three harmless from any
liability resulting from the assumption of the obligations
of District Number Four as to the Joint Exercise of
Powers Agreement.
J. That the sewage facilities necessary to integrate the
systems of District Numbers Three and Four shall be
_constructed and pai-d for from funds' of District Number
Four and the funds provided in Federal Grant Number
C-06-0632 (fonnerly WPC~Cal-632).
K. The Agency agrees to pay to the Consolidated District
the consolidation fee in the sum of $394,190., payable
in five, equal, annual payments of $78,838., beginning
July 1, 1974.
Agenda Item #43 X-2 District 3
CONSOLIDATION AGREEMENT Page Three
L. Dictrict Number Four chall, after the date of this
agreement, have the right to discharge its waste water
into the sewerage facilities of District Number Three
for treatment and disposal by District Number Three and
commencing with the date of such discharge by District
Number Four, District Number Four shall pay District
Number Three an amount equal to six per cent (6%) per
annum of the consolidation fee until the effective date
of consolidation of July lfi 1974 in addition to the costs
provided for in Section "G' above.
M. The rights, duties, and obligations of ea.ch of the parties
to this agreement are conditioned upon the City of Seal
Beach rece1ving Federal Grant Number C-06-0632 (formerly
WPC-Cal-632) in an amount sufficient to provide District
Number Four with approximately eighty per cent (80%) of
the eligible costs as set forth in the application and
other grant documents, and are to be ·of no further force
or effect in the event such grant is not received.
THIS AGREEMENT is executed in four (4) parts; each is hereby declared
to be an original; all, however, shall constitute but one and the
same agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have affixed their hands and
seals with all the formalities required' by law.
CITY OF SEAL BEACH
Mayor
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH
By .._,...~--------------~--------------~ Chainnan
Executive Director-Secreta~y
Agenda Item #43 X-3
SANITATION DISTRICT NUMBER
FOUR OF ORANGE COUNTY
By
-c~h-a~i-r_m_an--------------------~
General Manager
SANITATION DISTRICT NUMBER
THREE OF ORANGE COUNTY
By
~C-h-a~i-r_m_a_n--------------~-----
General Manager
District ·3
RESOLUTION NO. 72-78
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF
EASMENT RE CONTRACT }\-0. 7 .,6.-1
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 &
7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF
EASEMENT FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISON COMPANY RE CONTRACT NO. 7-6-1
* *·* * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1 & 7 of Orange C?unty, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That certain Grant of Easement dated January 24, 1972
wherein an easement for sanitary sewer purposes is granted to
County Sanitation District fio. 7, is hereby accepted from
Southern California Edison Company; and,
Section 2. That the real property over which said easement
is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits
"A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That said easement is granted in connection with
construction of the Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 1, Contract No.
7-6-1; and,
Section 4. That authorization for payment in the amount of
$1,224 to Southern California Edison Company, Southeastern Division,
1325 South Grand Avenue, Santa. Ana, California, is hereby granted;
and,
Section 5. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 & 7, be authorized and directed to
record said Grant of Easement in.the Official Records of Orange
County, California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1972.
Agenda Item #47 -Y-Districts 1 & 7
cou;ny SA:HTA TI o~~ lJ I STR I CTS OF O!>...-\:~GE cou::TY
P. O. Box 8127 -10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
c. 0. 1\0~ 7
CONTRACTOR: SULLY<"!TLLEI( CO~JTl~!\CTL:t; co::i>.\:f'Y ------~~~----~---DATE . :av iU 1~17 2
J 0 B • S. ' ' 1 l~ I 0 . ~ J . I) I \ ~ T J • P , 1 .. ) T () 1 . • ' , • \ C . -1 ' 0 .... , 1) " C rl' '' 0 7 6 1 ·--------~-u_ .. _·_J __ ~_. _:_·,_._._. __ :._·,t_J_:_1~-·~~, __ t~_1_:1 __ 1_! __ ~,_l_J_·_··;_1_., __ .,_~ ___ .··~·-----------------~-----~~
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) ~nEmlCIJ $ 1,960.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the
contract anJ/or contract work arc hereby authorized .and as corapensation
therefor, the following additions to or dc<luctions from the contract price are
hereby approvc<l. ..
REFERENCE: Letter fron Boyle Engineering d~ted April 5, 1971
The Contractor was dircctcJ. to start construction
at Station 2+7~.19 on this project instead of
Station 2+23.19 as dclincatctl on the plans upon
which the Contractor sub;.1ittecl his bi<l. The
decrease in the pipe len~th was t.o accoii11:10<la tc
the Districts' then proposed puuping station
(Project :Jo. I-7-3). The Contractor sustaincJ
addition a 1 work anJ ext endc<l <lc\·:a tcr i:1g sys tcr.1
prior to notification of station chan~e.
ADD
TOTAL ADD
Original Contract Price $
Prev. Au th. Changes $
This Change (ADD) ~mmuc:rJ $
Amended Contract Price s
B2'!rd authorization date: Approved:
$1,960.00
$1,960.00
2,2':1'1,481.1'1
6,569.33
1,960.00
., 1 c)(1 nio .... 0
'--' ... . , . ' I , • .1 .'.)
COUXTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By __ ~~~--------~----,.....-.--_...~-..-~~ Clnef Eng1nee~
SULLY ~·HLLE!t co:~TRACTI~~G C0~1P . .\>!Y
By
Agenda Item //h8 -Z-Districts 1 & 7
cou:\TY S.\::IT:\Tio:: ur:;r;~lCTS OF o::...\::GE cn;~:TY
P. O. Box 3127 -106-14 J:llis ,\vc-nue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CJIA~~GE OIWER
c ~ 0" l\O .. 8
co:~TRACTO:~: SULLY-:IILLEI~ co::TP.:\CTI~:G CO.'!P.\~;y DATE ~~lc'l )~~ io-:-_-~lq'j.7
7-6-1
Amount of this Change Order (·;XDD0 (DEDUCT) $ __ 7_..,_6_7_6_._o_n __
In accordance with contract provisions, the following .chan~~es in the
·Contract an <l /or con~ r a c t \W r k a r c h c r e by author i z c d and . a s con pc n s a t ion
therefor, the following additions to or deductions frora the contr[!.ct price are
here by approved. . .
ADJUST;JEXT or: E;~GI~·n:ER' s QUA:~TITIIS
ADD
Item
No.
3
6
7
9
DEDUCT
)
13
..
Unit --
L.F.
V. I;.
V.F.
V.F.
Change
ProI:l
10,098
250
41
31
l,40?
1
"-"" Board authorization <late:
May l~, 1972.
Agenda Item //:49
Est'<l. Quant.
To
10,100
277
46
32
Change
2
27
5
1
56
1
Unit Price
S147
$180
$200
$ 90
TOTAL ADD
<'.: 1 t) ~ ,... ~·-.,. -
$3,000
TOTAL DEDUCT
$ 294.00
4,860.00
1,000.00
90.01}
$ 6,244 .. 00
$ 1 fl J ~ 2 (,' 1 0 I~
3,0DO .. ~;o_
.$13 ' 9 2 0 • 0 0
$ 7,676.00
Original Contract Price $ ? .., n " ,, ("I 1 " n ... ' ;.., :J \) ' ...... l) • ~ J ...,
Prev. Auth. ChangcsC.O.i.~5 $
. 6 & i Adds
8,529.38
This Change (\:\Till) (uEDUCT) $ 7,676.00 ---
Amended Contract Price $2,291,334 .. 38
-AA-
Approved:
COUNTY SA~\ITAT I O!J DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
Districts 1 & 7
---
cou:~TY SA:; I"L.\T I C1 ~: lJ I ST!~ I CT s OF o:~A:: GE ccu: :TY
P. O. Box 3127 -100.l~ Ellis Avenue
Fouutain \'alley, California 92708
Amount of this Chan_gc Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ ___ ---=o-'"----
In accordanc c ,.;i th contract provisions, the f o 1 lowing changes in the
contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as cor.1pcnsation
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the con tr.act price are
hereby approved.
rhe Contract.or is hereby granted an extension of: time
due to inclerr.en t \·Jea thcr for the follmdng: time periods.
October 28 -29, 1971
November 12, 1971
December 3, 1971
December 12 13, 1971
December.22 -31, 1971
;
SUMMARY:
-....,.
Orie::lnal Ccntract· Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
Board authorization date:
May 10, 1972
Aeenda. I tern 1/50
2 calendar· da~vs
1 calendar c12~/s
1 calendar· d:-;.ys ·
2 calendar cJ2.ys
10 calendar d2.ys
TOT.AL Tir:IE EXTENSION
March 10, 197J.
j65 calendar cays
March 9, 1972
381 calendar days
Mar-ch 25, 1972
Original Contract
16 calendar da~!S
Price $ 2 200 l181 on
' ..-' ' • -• -.J
Prev .. Au th. Cha·nge s (ADD) $ 0 ,... 3 -s u~~---
This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ -0-
Amended
-BB-
Cm1tract Price s ? ')91 --4 -(") -,..::._t.~~-· ~-
Approvell:
CO UI·\TY SA?-; I'L \TI 0 N DI STRICT S of
Orange County, California
By ____ ~~~_:_--~~~~_.;...---~~--..~-
L 1n c r ; : ;1 1 ~ 1 n c--~~
SULLY-!·'.iILL~~R COHTRACTDJG CC·:? /~~-;y
Distrl.cts 1 & 7
RESOLUTION NO. 72-52
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-6-1 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 & 7, OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING SUNJi'LOWER
INTERCEPTOR, REACH 1, CONTRACT NOo 7-6-1 AS
COMPLETE
* * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
1 & 7, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Sully-Miller Contracting
Company, has completed the construction in accordance with the
terms of the contract for the.Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 1,
Contract No. 7-6-1; on March 25, 1972; and,
Section 2. That by letter, Boyle Engineering, District's
engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been
completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and·,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has
concurred in said engineers' recommendation, which said recommenda-
tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That the Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 1, Contract
No. 7-6-1, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the
terms of the contract therefor, dated the 10th ·day of March, 1971;
and,
Section 5. That the Chainnan of District No. 1 is hereby
authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1972.
Agenda Item #51 -CC-Districts 1 & 7
cou:~TY SA:aTATIO:~ DISTRICTS OF O!?~A:;G[ cou:;ry
P • 0 • Box 81 2 7 - 1 0 8 ·l 4 E 11 i s Av c nu c
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CIIA~~GE OiWER
JOB: ;iain-Jycr Intur"Cl!plor, :'.L:~u..:lies 25, 2G, 27 :j 23 -Contract 1-12
,__,, Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEI}U:Ct:) $1,760.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the
contract an<l/or contract work are hereby authorized an<l .as conpensation
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are
hereby approved. . .
REPERE>:CE: Adjustncnt of Engineer's Quantities
ADD
Chan~e l~stinJtctl l~uanti ty
Item Unit Fr01a 1 o C.1an~e Unit Cost
9
11
19
DEDUCT
V. F.
V.F.
L.F.
116 136
60 75
90 120
20
15
30
70.00
50.00
20.00
ADD
ADD
ADD
TOTAL ADD
Sl,400.08
750.00
600.00
$2,750.00
Chan!!C Estiuate<l Clu:-intitv
Item Un it .. I= r on l.
1 o C j ~an:~ c f j ~ i it Co s t
10
22
V.F.
C.Y.
38
10
30
0
H~d authorization date:
~-!a y 1 0 , 19 7 2
Af.~enda Item !/52
3
10 .
55.00
55.00
DEJ)UCT
DEDUCT
,·.
y 440.00
550.00
TOTAL DEDUCT $ 990.00
TOTAL Aim THIS CIIAXGE OEDl~n $1, 760. 00
Original Contract Price $'4z?,]tt6_.o...__o..._ __ _
Prev •. Auth. Changes ;ti $~ .. 1,osn.s0
This Change (ADD) (Pi:mw:~~J $ 1 1 760. oo
Amended Contract Price SA74,956e59
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange C~unty, California
By
Districts 1 & 7
COU:·:TY SA:~I'L\TJu:~ DISTi~ICTS OF o~~\::GE cou:~TY
P. 0. Box 3127 -lOo-14 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHA~~GE OlW~R
c.o.
DATE
lW. .)
'l~v 10
$
l ~) 7 2
0.00 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) --------
In accordance \d th contract prov is ions, the fo I lowing changes in the
.contract an <l Io r contract work a r e h c r c by author i z e d and a s comp ens at ion
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from.the contract price are
hereby approved.
EXTL'~SIO~i 01~ TI;IE
l11e contractor is hereby granted an extension
of time· for the follo~dng:
1 • Pac i f i c C 1 a y Pro Ll u ct s 1·rn s u nab 1 c to <l c 1 iv er
pipe to the job site frou l~ov 13, 1;~71 to
Dec 3, 1971 due to lat:l~ of inve:ntory
Time Ext.ens ion 21 calendar days
2. Inclement h'caU1er for the folloHing dates:
0 c t.. 2 0 -2 9 ' 1 9 7 1
Dec. 12-13, 1071
D cc • 2 2 -31 , 1 ~) 7 1
Tot~l tine extension Jue to. ,,·eather
2 cale1~dar· days
2 calendar clays
10 cal enJa r cla 'ts
14 ca 1 en Jar d a~· s
./
3. The Contractor was unable to ~:wkc the co11-
·nectio11 and tie-ins for t~1c job hccrnse OCSU
Project ;:o. 1-7-3 \:as not re~llly to accept
s c \·:age u n t i 1 a ft er its ant i c i pa t c cl con p 1 ct ion
<late
Time Extension~ 33 caleridar days
TOTAL TLlE EXTE:·lSIQl-; TIIIS CI!1\.\GE ORDEl~ 73 calen<l2r davs
su:.fL\RY
Original Contract ~late
Original Contract Tin~e
Ori~inal Completion iJate
Tir.lC Ex tens ion Previous ChanQc Orders
Tim c Ext ens ion Thi s C: la n ~~ e 0 ;_:de r
Total Extension of Contract Tiuc
Rev i ·s c c.l Contra c t Ti 11 e
Revised Con1)letion j)Q.te
Original
August 2 6 ~ 1 ~) 71
180 cale1iJar days
Fcb~uary 22, 1972
0 calcn(br davs
73 calentlar tl;ys
73 calendar davs
2 s 3 cal c;Hln.r <lays
. i·-Ia y 5, 19 7 2
Contract Price $ 472 146.00
Prev •. Auth .. ChaFgcs $ 2,s10.s0
Bo'"'d authorization date:
~lay 10, 1972
Ar.;enda Item ://53
This Change (ADD)(DEDUCT) $ 0.00
Amended
-EE·-
Contract Price $ 4 7 ~i 9S6.S9
Approved:
COOXTY SA~ITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By_·----------~....---~-...----Chio f En;; 111 ee :·
t.iIKE ~IASA!WVICII co~~STIUJCTION CO~:I',\:~y
By
Districts 1 & 7
RESOLUTION NO. 72-79
· ACCEPTING . CONTRACT NO. 1-12 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 & 7 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING MAIN-
DYER IN'TERCEPTOR, REACHES 25, 26, 27 & 28,
CONTRACT NO. 1-12, AS COMPLETE
* * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
1 & 7, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Mike Masanovich Construction
Company, Inc., has completed the construction in accordance with
the terms of the contract for the Main-Dyer Interceptor, Reaches
25, 26, 27 and 28, Contract No. 1-12, on May 5, 1972; and,
Section 2. That by letter, Boyle Engineering, District's
engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been
completed in accordance with the tern1s of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has
concurred in said engineers 1 recommendation, which said recornmenda-
tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That the Main-Dyer Interceptor, .Reaches 25, 26,
27 and 28, Contract. No. 1-12, is hereby accepted as completed in
accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the
26th day of August, 1971; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of District No.· 1 is hereby
authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting'held May 10, 1972.
Agenda. Item #54 -FF-.Districts 1 & 7
•
ORDINANCE NO. 715
AN ORDINANCE AMEIIDING ·ORDINANCE 711
fJ"1ENDIHG AITD HEA17FIHMING ORDIHANCE 712
AND REPEALING OHDINANCES '713 AND 714
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of
Orange County, California, does ordain as follows:
ARTICLE 1
Ordinances 713 and 714 are hereby repealed.
ARTICLE 2
Subsections 1, 2, and 3, Section (a), Article 2 of or·dinance 712
is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section (a) of Article 6 of Ordinance 711 is amended to read
as follows:
(a) District Connection Charges. No application for a permit
for a coill1ection to a District sewerage facility or to any sewerage
facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be
considered until a District connection charge is paid by the applicant,
provided, however, that such fee shall not be payable when a permit is
issued for the re-connection or alteration of an existing connection
for the same use made by the District or at the request of the District.
No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established use
of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which
establishes the use of said property.
The following District connection charges are hereby established
and shall b~ paid to the District or to an agericy designated by the
District:
(1) Regular Connection Charge, Residential Uses.
(a) Single family dwellings. ·$175 per dwelling unit.
Said charge shall be increased by $25.00 on July 1, 1973
and annually thereafter on July.1st for the next succeeding
two years.
Agenda. Item lf-59 GG-1 District 7
(b) Multiple dwellings. $250 per dwelling unit. A
multiple dwelling is any structure designed or used for
residential purposes, other than a motel or hotel, which
would require use zoning of a greater density than R-1
zone as R-1 zone is defined in the Orange County Zoning
Code, Section 78.0214.l through 78.0214.6 inclusive, if
such zoning classification would be required to make the
use of the subject property in conformity with applicable
zoning standards of the County of Orange.
(2) Regular Con..nection Charge, Commercial or Industrial
Establishments. $437.50 per acre of area (computed to
nearest l/lOth of acrajprovided that such charge shall not be
less than $175 .. 00. The term "commercial or industrial estab-
lishments 11 as used herein shall include motels, hotels and
property owned or occupied by goverrunental agencies and non-
.. profit organizations. Commencing on July 1, 1973, said charge
per acre and minimum charge shall be increased to $500.00 and
$200.00 respectively and annually on July 1 for the next
succeeding two years, said charges shall be increased by $62.50
per acre and $25.00 respectively.
(3) Trunk Connection Charge, Residential Uses.
(a) Single Frunily Dwelling Unit. $6.oo per front foot
f.or the real property fronting on and connecting to a trunk
sewer provided that no such charge .shall be less than
$400000 plus the applicable regular connection charge for
?ingle family dwelling hereinabove specified.
(b) Multiple Dwelling Units. $6.oo per front foot for the
real property fronting on and connecting to a trunk sewer
provided that no such charge shall be less than $400.00
plus the applicable. regular connection charge for multiple
family dwellings hereinabove specified.
Agenda Item -#59 GG-2 Dlstrlct 7
ARTICLE 3
Article 18 of Ordinance 711 is hereby amended to read as
follows:
At least 45 days before any fonnal consideration of an
amendment to this Ordinance, the Secreta~y shall notify, in
writing, each public corporation performing as a local sewering
agency in the District: Such notice shall also be mailed to any
person who has filed a request for notification with the District
and all established Chambers of Commerce in the District and the
Orange County Cha.mber of Commerce. The notice shall contain a
brief description of the nature of the amenqment to be considered
and the time and place when formal action will be taken.
ARTICLE 4
Except as herein amended, Ordinance 712 is ratified, reaffirmed
and is to become effective July 1, 1972, as amended by this Ordinance.
ARTICLE 5
The Chairman of the Board of Directors shall sign this Ordinance
and the Secretary of the Districts shall attest thereto and certify to
the passage of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be published
once in the Tustin News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation
printed, published and circulated in County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California, within fifteen (15) days after the date
of the passage of this Ordina.nce by said Board of Directors, and said
Ordinance shall take effect July 1, 1972.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 7, of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting
held May 10, 1972.
Agenda Item #59 GG-3 District 7
H. LAWSON MEAD
ATTORNEY AT LAW
20t4 NORTH BROADWAY
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706
542-6771
April 20, 1972
Board of Directors, County Sanitation Districts
County Sanitation District #7
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Re: Annexation·No. 27 (Mead)
Gentlemen:
On behalf of Frank F. Mead, Lolita Mahoney and
Nan M. Curran, who are the owners of approximately 120 acres
east of Orange which is the subject of Annexation No. 27
to Sanitation District ·#7, I request that final action
approving that annexation be postponed pending annexation
of that same parcel to the City of Orange.
It is hoped that annexation of this property to
the City of Orange will be completed within sixty days.
Very tr.uly yours,
H. Lawson Mead
HLM:cp
Agenda. Item #60 -HH-District 7
~-1 E ~ .. 1 0 R A N D u r .. r
To: Fred A. Harper
From: Ray E. Lewis
Subject: Tract No. 6967
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE. COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O.BOX8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAI~ VALLEY, CALIFORNl.A 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
The Engineering Departr;1ent has reviewed the request fron
Farro\·: }J e v c 1 op u en t Corpora t ion on o eh a 1 f of F i rs t : ,'ester n
Banl: rega.r<linr; t}1e annexation of a ;?Ortion of Tract 6967
to County Sn n it at ion J i st r i ct i: o . 7 T} ii s are a , ... as
annexed to the City ·of Ora:a2e in June of 1969 and is
·proposeJ for residential iZ-1 development. ':fhc proposed
dcve lopmen t is in conformity i.vi th the District's
!-laster Plan anJ I hereby rccoanen<l that this request
be presented to t~e Joard of Directors for their con-
siclera tion. Ti1e development appears to be Hithin the
parameters of tl1e I-laster Plan Report and within the
policies set forth by the Board.
REL: hj 1:i
5/5/72_
Agenda Item #6l(a) II-1 District 7
H
H
I
I\)
I ' I
I
P!ZOPOStO ANNfX A1lO.N oF A
FOK1lON oF1RAGT G:>OJG,1 10
Dl'?1RlC1 N~7
(
. ,
<oc~r: N i~~oo'
·D
<
lC I \/f. PALMA~
I "
FARROW DfVfLCF1"1tN1 CORP.
RESOLUTION NO. 72-66-7
INITIATING PROCEEDINGS -ANNEXATION
NO. 29 -PORTION OF.TRACT b967
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
THE INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX
TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION
NO. 29 -PORTION OF TRACT 6967)
* * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
That an application for annexation of territory to itself be
made to the Local Agency Formation Commission as follows:
Section 1. That this proposal is made pursuant to Division 1 .
(District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Govermnent
Code of the State of California; and,
Section 2. That this application is for the purpose of
annexing approximately five acres, as requested by Farrow Develop-
ment Corporation, Developers, and consented to by First Western
Bank and Trust Company, owners of said property; and,
Section 3. That the territory to be annexed is uninhabited; and,
Section 4. That the designation assigned to the territory
proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 29 -Portion of
Tract 6967 11 , the boundaries of which are more particularly
described and delineated on Exhibit "A" and· Exhibit "B", attached
hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 5. That provisions for fees required to be paid as a
condition of the annexation must _be satisfied prior to completion
of annexation proceedings; and,
Section 6. That request is hereby·made that such proceedings
as required by law be taken to complete this annexation.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held 1'iay 10, 1972 ..
~~nda Item #6l(b) -JJ-District 7
Ap r i 1 12 , 1 9 72
Board of Di rectors
County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attn: Mr. Fred Harper, General Manager
Re: Jamboree Subtrunk Se\-1er
(Main Street to 1200 Feet Northerly)
Gent 1 emen:
_The Irvine Industrial Comolex respectfully requests permission to
construct a portion of the Master Planned Sewer System at the
subject location.
Since the line will be located outside of street right of way, the
Complex wi 11 grant to the District a permanent easement for main-
tenance purposes until the street is fully improved and dedicated
to the City of Irvine. ·
the District's engineers will design, prepare specifications and
improvement plans, stake and inspect the above project with the
Complex awarding the contract to the lowest bidder after approval by
the District.
After construction is completed and the final costs tabulated, the
Complex will request the District to prepare the usual. Reimbursement
Agreement with the Complex for the said improv~ments.
A map delineating the construction limits is enclosed for your reference.
Very truly yours,
~~1~~
Michael J. Babbitt
Senior Project Engineer
MJB/gw
encl.
cc: Williamson and Schmid
Agenda Item #62
21 22 Campus Ori110 I Box 4404 • lrv1no. California 9.2 664 • (714) 833-1010
-KK-District ·-r
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF·RAMP. S~N DIEGO FREEWAY)
May·10, 1972
Board of.Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 7 of Orange County
Subject: Report on receipt of sealed proposals for the
construction of sanitary sewers and appu~tenances
in Assessment District No. 9
Pursuant to the authority granted by Resolution No. 72-44-7,
sealed proposals for construction of sanitary sewers and
appurtenances in Assessment District No. 9 were received,
publicly opened and examined on May 2, 1972, at 11:00 a.m.
Proposals were received from three firms which are set forth
on the attached bid tabulation. All bids were in compliance
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
with the Notice Inviting Bids and were accompanied by the required
bid bond.
JWS:rb
Agenda Item #63(a)
. ~~;:f-1 / .. /
. / 'j[f/)l{_ ,, ,,/ { (,; f / :~\ ,/~. W:8jJne Sy,{ vest er .
Secf6tary ~f the Board
of Directors
LL-1 District 7
En 0oinccr's Estinatc ~55 560 ~ ' .
BI D T A B U L A T I 0 N
S H E E T
Contract For: S.:\:HTARY SE1:tER SYSTE~l
ASSESS:lE~\T DISTRICT :\O. 9
* 1.
2.
. 3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
CONTRACTO~
Raymar Conpany
Los Anp,eles
Thunderbird Construction
Santa .Ana
City Construction
Covina
Agenda Item #63(a) -LL-2
Date ~ta y 2, 19 7 2 -11 : o o :\. ~ ! •
TOTAL BID
$ 71,SOQ
$126,150
$176,600
District 7
"!? ~ /fa .!J [(}~f/$
ENGINEERING a
ENGINEERS• ARCHITECTS .
412 SOUTH LYON STREET SANTA /\NA, CALIFORNIA 92702 • TELEPHON,E <714> 547-4471
ADDRESS REPLY TO P.O. BOX 178
J.tJy 4 I J 972
Delbert ~erby, M.D.
7034 Kakansa udvo
Rsdcllng, CA 96001
Aslel-unent District Nt). 9
Bids w•re o;>en<KJ on tvhf 2, 1972 for construction of th& sonltory uwer In
Assosament Olitrict r-~o. i. Three bids WOtll recuived Cl foilowa:
Contractor Total Bid
Raymor $ 7l,500
Thunderbird Conatructlon 126, lSO
City Construction Company 176,600
The ~n1Jne«1 1 o!.tf mote for this wotk was $50,.560. Th" IOYtett bid of
$71,500 r~preun~s o 42 oerc~t lncreoH ov~r the enqincar's eitimato for
ccrutructlon and ot)~roxi:nata-fy a JJ porcont incroc.ie in o~eraH com whan
'lncldilntal oxpsnw1 ere 1nciud.d.
At onaJn.eor of work, we wera diso~~otnted ln rc-~elot of onf y throe bids and
olao by th~ t:>r~d of O'lttU $1G0 1 C~J b~twesn tr1• high and low tiiddor. (t
oppaors thot the contractors were afraid of th~ ·eek conaltiont involved with
this proloct and tha bids retiact th• tronehi~;J pr®iemt.
When the lowest bid it •n aY.cesa of 15 parcent of the .enqlneer1 1 ettlmate, the
1911 Act ~·»roca0<1in~111 require tha f&'.1hlctlv• body to djro~t the clerK or 1.1era-
tary to give notic.• i:>y moil of s~h incroose ov~r the e;timot~ ~w. ~.-h~ boald
of dJreetori wiii mo~t on l'v\Jy iiJ, J ·172, ot which timtt thl1 directivo wiU no
dovht bo given to th~ s-&Grotary cJf tho district. The board may aiao wont on
•xptcHslon of opinion frcm ths property own•rs.
P R 0 F E 5 S I 0. N A L ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
Agenda Item #63(b) MM-1 District 7
Pogo 2
Delbert Sowerby, lv\. D.
Noy 4, 1972
The boord of directors hos the fol lowing courHS of adion open to them at
the next board mes ting 1 ·
A. Awcrd tho contract to the IO"Nest btdder.
8. Raf oct ths bids and readvertlse in the hopo that lower btds wlll be ·
received.
C. Abandon the prof ect.
D. Modify th~ Re-sol utlon of Intention to allO\Y tho work to be ·done by
tho property owners without the financing fe-otures Inherent in the
1911 Act proce~ing1.
It Is our opinion as en·1ineer of work that, lf tho existing bids oro reie<:ted
and new bids ore obtained, a siqnificant reduction in construction cost will
not ja obtoinod. foe comtruction wiU also be d\jfoyed anorhor month.
Wo sugg£st that tho prcn.erty owners writo the Boord of Dlr&eton of County
Sanltotion Di~ttict No. 7 ~rior to thtt l\'\oy 10, 1 J72 mel!ting .and inform
the b00td os to whet action the boord should toke regarding th. aword of
tho contr°'t•
~(/~
Corl A Carlsen, C E. 6654
pp
County Sanitation District No. 7 ~,·
f.i.r. Frod A. t-'.arper
~. Arthur N.r.son
Jaek J klmal
a-co1-109-so
Also sent to:
· Frank F. Mead, Jr.
20002 East Chapman Avenue
Orange, CA 92667
Sandy G. Moc Pherson
439 East Broadway
Long Beach, CA 90802
County of Orange
~ Specialty Restaurants Orange Park Acres Mutual
Water Co.
c/o Real Property Services
400 Civic Center Drive \//est
Santa Ana, CA 92701
(Attention Mr. Rich tv\:Jtheny)
(-~ '":'":· ~ .~ ~ ::-.---2977 Redondo Avenue
I• : ' •
• '· ·--. '4 .., ---Long Beach, CA 90806
·-j (Attention f'.i..r. Paul Schreiber)
, .... , -\ ' . '
29119 North tv\ain Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
BOYLE ENGINEER!NG
Agenda Item #63(b) MM-2 District 7
Board of Directors
20002 E. Chapman Avenue
Orange, California 92669
May ?, 1972
Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County
P. o. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Gentlemen:
We have received a letter notifying us that bids were opened on
MaY 2, 1972 for construction of the sanitary sewer in Assessment
District No~ 9o
We were disappointed in the amounts shown in the 3 bids received;
however, we have been informed that many other contractors did
not bid because of the rock condition.
We, therefore, feel that the contract should be awarded.to the
low bidder and the for.nation of the district and the work should
proceed as quickly as possibleo
Truly yours
,,..--c_-<-. _,.__ ,-:_· / . . (.__ __
FRANX F. MEAD
FFM/se BEATA G. MEAD
Agenda Item #63(d-l) -NN-District 7
OFFICE HEMLOCK 6-6488 RES. GARFIELD 7-1479
DR. SANDY G. MACPHERSON
DENTIST
433 EAST BROADWAY
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90802
May 8,1972
Board of Directors
Sanitation Dist!'ict Ho. ? of Orange County
P. o. Box 812?
Fountnin Valley, California 92?08
Gen tl e."'Tlen:
Tie have recieved a letter noti!':,ring us that bids ~ere
opened· on r.:ay 2, 19?2 for construe ti on of tlle sani tur.r
sewer in assessment District 1-:0. 9.
Ile, therefore, feel that the contract should be ar:arded
to the low bidder a."'16.. "'.;!le forr:-~ation of t::e district ar.d
the work should :;;>roce·Jd as quickly us possible.
Sincerely, · . ~-;· / J/' r; \.----·-·-. _/ y-?<:>_~,/0>,f:>,i:: "£,.~
_,. Sanay ;6. ~'-ac?n.8rson DD.:>. :;
Agenda Item #63(d-2) -00-District 7
SPECIALTY RESTAURANTS
May 8, 1972
2977 REDqNDO AVENUE
TELEPHONE (213) 426-0451
Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitary District No. 7
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Gentlemen:
Subject: Construction of Sanitary Sewer in
Assessment District No. 9 ·
BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90806
We have been informed of the bid results of the sanitary
sewer designed by Boyle Engineering and, along with other
parties involved, were disappointed at the increased costs.
We are, however, vitally interested in the completion of
the sewer line within the schedule originally planned.
Along with the design engineers, we feel re-bidding and
delaying the schedule will serve no useful purpose or result
·in any significant reduction in construction cost.
We, therefore, would strongly support your decision to award
the contract to the lowest bidder, if that decision were made.
Very truly yours,
SPECIALTY RESTAURANTS CORPORATION
David C. Tallichet, President
DCT/JRU/go
Agenda Item #63(d-3) -PP-District 7
RENACER, INC.
~ LAND AND CATTLE,,~
277 PEARL STREET
LAGUNA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92651
/!hf!-8, 1972
Bocvul. o/ ObtedoM
San.Liailon Ow:Utid Ao. 7 o/ OIUil?.[fe [oun.iy.
'P. Q. Box 8127
F ouniai.n. V alleffe [ali.(otmi.a 9 2708
yen.ilemen:
[714] 494-6201
'i<~vull.ng ilte Leti.vt we !LeceLved nail-/~ U/.J ilw.i bi.d4 weA.e opened
on frJay 2, 1972 {01t coMhw.cilon o/ the -danLimty. /.JeJ.1J€/l in /1--1/.Je-tJ&nen..i
!Jldhtlci Aoo 9, J rmt4i exp1u?A/.J Oll/l -dUApll.We and d iAapf>Oinimerd. in i:h.e
.. amoun.JA o/ the J bi.d4.
We have le(l/l]led th.at. tAe Mch con.dLii.JJn cau/.Jed man!!-CJJnhuzcioM i.o
wLih.old a bid..
U'e uou!d l.i.he i.h.e conhuzd io fJO io the Low bi.ddvi and uould lL~e the
W<J_M to .dia!d:. GA .doon ad fXM.di..ble alonl} wlih the /ol'~n o/ ih.e dw-
hz.Lci.
791/de ·
Agenda Item #63(d-4) -QQ-District 7
.•
l
2
3
4
5
6
'1
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
RESOLUTION NO. 72-81-7
RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. -------
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOAiill OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALI-
FORNIA, AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOH THE \VORK
DESCHIBED IN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 72-42-7 OF
SAID DISTHICT.
The Secretary having duly and regularly, pursuant to Resolution
No. 72-44-7, adopted April 12, 1972, opened, examined and declared all
sealed proposals or bids for the following work to be done and improvements
to be made in this Dist_rict, to-wit:
The construction of sanitary sewers and all appurtenances and
appurtenant work in connection therewith in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9"
in said County S~nitation District No. 7 of Orange County, all as more parti-
cularly described in Resolution of Intention No. 72-42-7, passed and adopted
by the Board of Directors of said Sanitation District on March 21, 1972; and
The ~ecretary havjng duly and regularly reported to this Board of
Directors the results of the said bidding at this meeting, which is the next
regular meeting following the opening of said bids; and
For further particulars, reference is hereby made to said Resolution
of Intention No. 72-42-7, and to the plans, profiles and drawings on file in the
offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work of said sanitation district,
and to the specifications for the said work heretofore adopted by the said
Board of Directors and on file in the offices of the Secretary and the Engineer
of Work for said district, and all of said plans, profiles, drawjngs and speci-
fications heretofore approved by the Board of Directors of said County Sani-
tation ·District No. 7 of Orange County are incorporated herein and reference
is hereby made thereto for a more particular description of said work; and
Said Boa rd of Di recto rs has detc rmined and declared that the con -
templated work and improvement heretofore mentioned was, in the opinion
of sajd Board of Directors, of more than local or ordinary public benefit,
.,
and the said Board of Directors has made the expense of said work charge~blc
31 upo'n a district. For the particular descl'iption of said district, reference is
32 he re by made to said He solution of Intention No. 7 2-42-7.
LA.YI OFl"ICF.S OF
RlMEL, HARVCY Sc
LOGAN
FOUl!Tll fLOOR
SC\10 Nonni .. ~AIN 6T.
6A~ITA ANA,
Cl.L!l'"Cl~NIA P270, 11
Agenda Item !163(e) RR-1 District 7
l Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that serial
2 bonds, bearing interest at the rate of seven per cent (7%) per annum and
3 extending over a pe"riod ending nine {9) years from the second day of January
4 next succeeding the next September 1st following their date, will be issued
5 hereunder in the manner provided by the "Improvement Act of 1911," being
6 Part 5, Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California,
7 to represent each assessment of Fifty Dollars {$50. 00) or more remaining
8 unpaid at the expiration of the last date fixed· for payment of assessment in
9 t~e notice to property owners mailed pursuant to the provisions of Section 5390
10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and
11 Said Board of Directors has elected and determined to have the
12 redemption provisions of said bonds provide a premium of five per cent (5%)
13 of the unmatured principal in accordance with the provisions of Section 6464
14 of the Streets an? Highways Code of the State of Calif.ornia; and
15 All of the work herein ordered shall be done and carried through in
16 pursuance ofanAct of the Legislature of the State of California, designated
17 the "Improvement Act of 1911," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways
18 Code;
19 NOW·, THEREFORE, the Board of Di rectors of COUNTY SANITATIO'"
20 DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, California, does RESOLVE and
21 ORDER as follows:
22 That this Board hereby rejects all of the said proposals or bids excep
23 the next hereinafter mentioned, and hereby aviards the contract for the said
24 work and improvement to the lowest, regular and responsible bidder, to-wit:
25 RAMAR COMPANY, 2235 India Street, Los Angeles, California
26 at the prices named in their bid for said work, on file in the office of the
27 Secretary of said County Sanitation District No. 7.
28 The Secretary of said District is hereby directed to cause a Notice
29 of Award of Contract to be published in the manner and form required by said
30 Code in the OHANGE CITY NEWS, a nc\vspapcr published and circulated in
31 said District and he re by designated by the said Board for that purpose.
32 ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 10th day of
LAW OFf'ICEB Of'
RIMC:L. HAnVCY &
LOGAN
t•ourtTH FLOOR
1010 NOIHtl MAIU ST, ,Agenda Item #63(e) District 7 RR-2
6ANTA. ANA,
I
I ,.
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
~
28
29
30
31
32
LAW OFF"ICES OF
RIMEi_ HARVEY &
LOGAN
FOURTH f"LOOft
1010 HOllTH l<1AIN ST,
f>ANTA IH4A,
CAl..IYCHN!.&. 9270,
Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary
Agenda Item #63(e) RR-3 District 7
TO 5/10 Meeting File
FROM Rita
M-E-M-0-R-A-N-D-U-M
DATE 5/16/72
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SUBJE~
~~~~~--~--~---~~~~~-
Called Supervisor Caspers' secretary and advised her of the
Executive Committee Meeting, which was called at the regular May
meeting for which Mr. Caspers was absent , to be held on May 31st
at 5:30 p .m .
MINUTE EXCERPTS RECEIVED FROM THE FOLLOWING:
, '
':"" ,./ -
___. '_, • ./
Anaheim
Cypress
Fountain Valley
Fullerton
La Habra
Newport Beach
Villa Park
Orange County Board
of Supervisors
(Minute excerpts for other cities were
received & filed at 4/27/72 meetings of
District 2 & District:. 3c\ll)
l COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
2 MINUTES FOR AWARD OF CONTRACT
3 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9
4
5 The Secretary notified the Board that this is the time and place for
6 the Board to consider the Secretary's written report of the bids received
7 pursuant to Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals for the construction of sanitary
8 sewers and appurtenances and appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
9 NO. 9," as contemplated by Resolution of Intention No. 72-42-7.
10 The Secretary further notified the Board that pursuant to the
11 authority granted him by Resolution No. 72-44-7, he did on May 2, 1972,
12 publicly receive, open, examine and declare -..".. bids. Reference is -----
13 hereby made to the bids on file with the Secretary for details as to the unit
14 prices and kinds or classes of work to be done.
15 The Secretary then presented to the Board of Directors his written
16 report upon the said bids so received. The Engineer of Work then reported
17 to the Board that he had checked and tabulated all of the bids received for the
18 said work as described in Resolution of Intention No. 72-42-7, and that the bid
19
20
21
of Dollars
22 is the lowest regular bid received for said improvement.
23 Director then offered and moved the adoption of
-~--------
24 RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. , awarding the con------
26 at the prices named in said bid, which said bid being the lowest regular bid
27 submitted for said improvement. The motion was seconded by Director
28
29
30
31
32
LAW OFFICES OF
RIMEL, HARVEY Sc
LOGAN
FOURTH FLOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN ST.
SANTA ANA,
CALIFORNIA 92701
and upon roll call vote said Resolution of Award of Con-
~~~~~--~~~-
tract No. was adopted by the following roll call vote: ------
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
...
May 10, 1972 Meeting
Minutes excerpts were received and filed from the fo llowing:
Anaheim, Cypress , Fountain Valley, Fullerton, LaHabra, Newport
Beach, Villa Park, and the County Board of Supervisors .
Annual Election of Chairmen :
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 11
Lorin Griset nominated . Moved & seconded nominations
cease . Motion carried.
Don Smith nominated . Moved & seconded nominations
cease . Motion carried .
Norman Culver nominated . MOved & seconded nominations
cease. Motion carried.
Don Mcinnis nominated . Moved & seconded nominations
cease . Motion carried .
Ellis Porter nominated. Moved & seconded nominations
cetBe. Motion carried.
Clifton Mi l ler nominated. Moved & seconded nominations
cease . Motion carried .
Norma Gibbs nominated. Moved & seconded nominations
cease . Motion carried .
Alvin Coen appointed Chairman pro tern for District 11
in the absence of Norma Gibbs.
#13 -Report of Joint Chairman
Called a meeting of the Executive Committee for 5:30, Wednesday,
May 31st, and invited Directors Donald Fox and Robert Root to
attend . They thought they would .be able to come .
Announced that Mr . Harper had been elected the 1972 -73 President
of the California Water Pollution Control Association and congratulated
him .
Advised that there would be an indoctrination meeting and tour for
the new Directors and asked if May 17th or 18th would be satisfactory .
Could not attend then because of a Mayor 's Convention.aN~x Changed
the date to June 1st and eight of the new Directors said they could
attend then . It will be held from 5:30 to 8:30 p .m. and a light
dinner will be served .
#14 -Report of General Manager
Mentioned that the new Directors would be receiving Directors'
Elbow Books regarding Districts ' organization, rules, agreements , etc .
at the June 1st indoctrination meeting.
Report ed that Assembly Bill 21 46 being sponsored by our Districts
to make it possible to reduc e Directors ' fees, and bein g handled
by Ken Norris, Legislative Advocate for CASA , will be heard at
Committee l evel for the first time tomorrow (5/11). Should have
the printed Bill tomorrow or the next day .
Ment ioned that our Laboratory program included monitoring on a
daily basis 14 miles of coast line , and introduced Ted Dunn who
presented a slide program on the Laboratory Department .
Mr . Harper also introduced ot her members of the staff and briefly
exp l a i ned what their depar tments function was .
#15 -Report of General Co unsel & #43 (Dist . 3 &4 Consolidation)
No special report but asked that none of the District 3 Directors
leave before Item No . 43 on th e Agenda was brought up . It was
moved and seconded that Item 43 be taken up right then. N~sson
briefly summa ri zed item: Consolidation Agreement is a culmination
of study recommended by General Ma nager . District 4, outside of
J oint Organization , is City of Seal Beach . That District will pay
to District 3 a fee equivalent to a n annexation fee. Will come
into District 3 without any obl i gations and when it comes in ,
Dis trict 4 assumes obligations of District 3 . Name of District
will be District 3 . Seal Beach has approved agreement and feel
p.2
their condi tions are adequa t e and in compl ian ce with National Concept
of Sanitation and Sewage Control, and is a step toward reduction
of special districts by consolidating into one District .
Battin asked, if this consolidation goes through, will Redevelopment
Agency take Redevelopment property off County tax rolls?
Nisson answered , it will not do anything to take it out of County
tax roll s as such. Improvements to be made will not come on to be
taxed for a period of 15 years but existin g value assessments will
be Ltaxed.
What is consolidation fee that will be paid over 5 year period? Would
it be a normal fee .
Nisson: Yes , would be a norma l fee . Eq u ival ent to fee that District 3
would , by its established policy , charge an area that would be annexed
to the District .
Motion made to authorize execution of Consolidation AGreement . Was
seconded and passed by unanimous roll call vote .
#19 -Report of Special Committee on agreement with OCWD
Mcinni s stated that agreement wa s brought to Joint Boards previously .
Agreement was not acceptable so special committee was formed study
and make recomme n dations (Mcinnis , Smith & Wedaa). Committee met
twice and came to an ag~ment . Mcinnis met with Districts ' staff
and staff of OCWD .
OCWD counter proposal was that water re delivered free for eight
more years, to 1~80 . In 1980 and every five years , that Sanitation
Districts amend agr e em e nt to provide for payment by Sanitation
p .3
Districts fo r any benefits from Water District or payment by OCWD
to Sanitation Districts for any cost savings by Water District .
As Chairman of the Special Committee , Mcinnis felt he completely
wasted his t i me meeting with OCWD r epresentative. OCWD attempted
to develop formu la for wastewater and i n cluded in WD agreement.
Not acceptable to committee based on these facts: "Agreement does
have economic val ue but we , as Directors , do not have right either
legally or mora lly to give anything of value belonging to the
general p.i.blic away ." Suggested that our staff contact various
agencies in our a r ea to determine economi c water value today.
Special Comm i ttee recommends that either of the following
a l ternatives be considered:
(1) Accept Special Committee 's draft agreement dated March 30 ,
1972 , as wr i tten ; or
(2) Accept the Special Committee 's agreement , in principle , and
inform Water District that their version of I tem 1 under
agreement is not acceptable.
FAH : From the staff 's viewpoint , we like the committee 's second
recommendation which would be to agree to the agreement in principle,
except that item No. 1 in agreement (what Water District proposes
is not accep t abl e ). This agreement is really imp0rtant to Water
District -First of a ll, Water District has a state and federal
grant of some $1 5 mil lion for faci l ities next door and won 't
recei v e any f unds u ntil agreeme n t is appr oved . Also the condition
that was made on tlie 1971-72 grants , wh i ch exceed $7 or 8 million
of state and federal funding , was that we enter into a reasonable
agreement with the Water District . We have received the first
payment under the terms of the grant program (about 25% -$2 million)
Also received a letter that we would not receive any future
payments .unti l this matter is resolved , so is important that
we get this taken care of . Our recommendation is to accept agree -
ment in principle (Recommendation No . 2). This was moved and
seconded.
Griset asked : Water District is not will i ng to nail down water
value , is that cor r ect? Mcinnis read WD version of this portion
of agreement.
The question was asked if revision to agreement would be brought
back to Board for their final approval & answer was , yes .
Wedaa stated that Exhibit "N " was provided to District and was the
value of wastewater according to nine different similar agencies
in the area . I f everybody else is selling water, why shouldn't we?
? said it should be paid for in advance .
Motion to approve agreement in prihciple and send back to Special
Committee was carried .
p . 4
#20 -Accepting proposal of Terry & Assoc .
Baker : Proposal suggests they will provide EIS in accordance with
state and federal guide l ines . Whater do they have avai l able and
what KN~~ do they mean?
PGE: SWRCB has prepared guidelines and also .EPA. State guidelines
have been out about a year but federal guidelines haven 't been
finally passed .
Baker asked if he could have a copy of guidelines and answer was, yes.
#22 -Report on participation in SCCWRP by SWRCB & EPA .
Parsons reported that about three years ago the five major sanitation
agenc i es of Southern California 's coastline decided there was little
or no information on discharge of sewage in water. They joined
together to study ef~ect of discharge on ocean water . (County of
Ventura , City of LA , LA Sanitauon Districts, OCSD, and City of
San Diego) Assembled information throughout the world & expect
to have first 3 -year report in October . Wi l l have a considerable
affect on determining what is happening out there . Have five of
the finest consultants in the world in the filed of Oceanography
and Public Health & they are bringing the first studies to a
conclu~ion . Politically , this has been a great thing for all of
these agencies. Have been able to hold off strict guidelines that
were about to be laid re discharge into ocean. F~~~ Believe that
if we get rid of certain toxic materials at source would not have
to go to secondary treatment. Cost of secondary treatment at
$1/2 Bill ion to $600 Million. May not have to go to seconaary
treatment that they are tryingg to require. Memo indicates that
SWRCB has awakened to what we are doing and wou l d like to take
project over . Project is of worthwhile significance and should be
state and federally funded . Doesn't think we sho~ld turn result
of present efforts over to these agencies as they have proposed;
however , Commission has recommended that MR. Bond and Mr . Parsons
go to Sacramento and discuss project with SWRCB . Mr . Bond has
asked Commissioners to check with their supporting agencies to see
if they are still inclmned to accept federal and state support .
Under their proposal would ~t up three -man steering committee--one
from EPA , one from SWRCB and one from our company . This is
totally unacceptable . Haven't given us any dollar figures as to
how much they want to spend in helping with our project but want
us to be paying administrative expenses. Shou l d tal k with SWRCB
and maybe give them a couple seats on Commission . They should pay
a large part of the fund i ng on this project . Whatever is negotiated
will have to come back to the Board for approval . Parsons
ended by saying, "Am asking how you fee l about the contintil.ing efforts
to get state and fedeEal funding in this project and also if you
fee l that the Commission is taking the right course to go to
Sacramento and discuss it?"
Griset moved to accept recommendation of Linds l ey Parsons. Motion ·
was seconded and carried.
p. 5
#25 -Other business
Don Smith mentioned that recently Santa Ana Region of Water Quality
Control Board approved waste discharge standards for Green River
Mobile Home Park and discharge is not up to standards . OCWD and
City of Orange . are ver~ concerned. Didn 't know if there was is
anything we can do about this .
FAH said Water District has taken this matter to State Board and
didn 't know whether it would be in order for us to do anything on
this . Will look into it and report back to Executive Committee.
#39 -Request of Calif . State College at Fullerton to extend
initial billing period & waive delinquency charge
Herrin asked what the feeling was on waiving delinquency charges.
County doesn't do it .
Finnell asked if this would be sebting a precedent.
a
JWS mentioned one other case where a firm applied for/permit
and Board passed resolution waiving delinquency charge.
FAH stated that this request was because of a budget problem .
Herrin said that County doen 't buy that when h e tells them that.
It was asked if this was a one-time dea l ? Answer was yet, to
get it on a fiscal basis . Asked how much delinque ncy fee was
and was answered, about $200 . Someone said that that amount was
not worth an ar g ument so moved the request be approved. Motion
was seconded and carried.
#41 -FAH men~ioned that tomorrow at 11:00 bids would be opened
for first reach of Santa Ana River Interceptor .
#59 -Roll call vote on Ordinance 715 . Ordinance adopted .
#6 0 -Deferral of Mead annexation.
Smith recommended it be continued after 90 days for annexation
to City of Orange.
#63(a) -Moved, seconded and carried .
#63(b) -Reported that there were three bids. Read bidders ' names
and amounts . Bids were higher than estimate but believe low bid is
a real istic one and that reviewing bids a nd re-advertising would
not result in any better pric e s . Low bidder not happy about that
amount but will do the job . Talked to bonding house and they
recommend him highly . Recommended that contract be awarded to
Ramar Company.
#63(c) -Rimel mentioned that one provision of Act provides that
when total amount of bid by lowest responsible bidder exceeds 15 %
of eng ineer 's estimate a s stated in Re s olut i on of Intention, the
cle rk s h a ll b e direct e d to g ive notic e by mai l of th e e stima t e d cos t .
This will h a v e t o b e done .
p . 6
Rimel talked to Mac Brown, who served on this legislative committee,
and he advised this was a compromise--didn 't make any provisions
that you couldn 't award bid but usually recommended that the Board
would order notice given and wait a reasonable time to award
contract (maybe until the next meeting). Have reviewed letters
from four owners which represent about 90% of property owners.
100% signed on protest to waive Majority Protest Act. It is
Rimel's opinion that we could award contract but should require
Secretary to write letters to property owners. Motion was moved
and seconded that we do so . Motion carried .
#65 -DISTRICT 7 Other business
Smith mentioned that City Council had approved authorization to
proceed with negotiations with Brandel(?) Estate Properties and
suggested that if Board so desires to w~F direct staff to work
with City Engineer on amending original request from City of
Orange, that trunk routing be approved. Three proposals to study
and report to the Board on that portion of it.
Lewis reported that he has been in contact with Cit~'s staff
and reviewed arrangements proposed by the City. Has been some
recent developments in the area of pe0pfue in the OPA tract not
wanting sewers at the present time, and petitioned Board of
Supervisors for sewers in area. Will meet with City's -staff
and Mr . Dickinson next week and will report back .
Smith just wantedto be sure that staff is directed to keep working
on development .
Loel Kuinge, OPA, was recognized by Chairman and stated that the
peop l e of OPA were interested in sewer lines and wanted to do it
in a right manner. Understands that since 1969 Handy Creek Nas
is major fall ine in OPA. A Greenbelt area is anticipateda along
Handy Creek. Developing this line along creek bend, Reach 1, will
not serve major part of OPA . More fitting to take a look at the
whole area and do justice for everybody . Al l of those South of
Chapman Avenue should be considered too as part of District 7 . Only
fitting and proper to consider whole area, not just Nohl(?) RAnch .
Also should include Irvine Park . Should consider whole drainage
area .
Smith restated that he was just asking if engineer would work with
City of Orange and actions would still be proceeding .
Kuinge said that present line does not include all of area & that
there are three routes to be considered.
Nisson stated that area should be annexed to District & is not in
District now.
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11,
OF O~NGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
;,."'-' Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange
County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m.,
May 10 , 19 72 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain
Valley, California.
The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called
the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretary r~~orteg a quorum
present for each District's Board.
* * * * * * * * *
DIS1·RICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
d;J ourrnnent
'l'h.:Jt thi:.; r11eeting of tt·e Board of
Directors of Cou.nty Sanitation Di.strict i~o. 2 be adjourned
to £;:ay 24, 1972, a i~ 5: 30 p . .ri1. The C!1uirman t!-1.e.n declared
tr!e meeting ~o adjourned at 8:57 p.m .. _, i.~dy 10, 1972.
STATE. OF CALIFORNIA~
SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE
I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the
Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11~ of Orange County, California,
do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full,
true and_correct copy of minute entries on m~eting of
said Boards of Directors on the 10th day of r•.i.ay
19 72 '
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this
10th day of May, i9·72.
of Directors
Nos.
?-~ and 11
S-107