Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972-05-10COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) May 5, 1972 TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 Gentlemen: The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Distrj_cts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, will be held: Wednesday evening, May 10, 1972 at 7:30 p.m~ 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California · 71creta~ Tentative adjournments prior to next regular meeting: Executive Co~.mittee District No. 2 Distri.ct No. 5 5:30 p.m.~ May 3C 5 30 n" 2L'I : p • m • , 1~J..ay t 4:30 p.m., May 25 at Newport Beach City Hall SEE ATTACHED MAPS OF DETOUR rJECESSARY TO ENTER PLPJ'ff NO. 1 . ' . ' I f UC LI D _ _,,. 'O'i, . ' I /. Mb.INJ TRANCt -~ .. . .... : S,. · . . ~ ON(~~~~~ . 0 I '~~< ·. : . ~i\lf4 :.--·.·. ~.' ~-""-( • CONTl<Dl. ~· ·. · 4A, .. ·. · .. · '""-" I I I CfNTfR . ~ : .... · ·v..q ~ · .. · _.. · .' ·~ . 0 ~ _Jl \\~oo <>~ o oY ~, -/~~~ ..... -.-. ._. :-' .. '.. ~r~ » , . . Ff-NCt' Al\I ~.~:!~. . O· o,-·-·-..) -r---. -00600 .OOo.o<looooae,~"if\')t ~. a "°"'"'~ ::.~ . . O.et.NO;t~ ~\4~~e"5 " 0 l T AD"1LN1'5TgcmoN 1-tNlNO r<t:JADNA.Y E)L>lL.DlN6 I L.Ae>~AT 01<-Y · tlll~ AVE --~,~~-~~--~-·,·~===~~ PLANT N~ 1 N01' iO SC£\le- Co ~nty S a :.l ~aHon D istrids of O rang~ County, Ca liforn i.:i BOARDS P. 0. Box d 12 7 108-44 El lis Aver.cc Founta in V1J iley, C;;l if., 92708 -========== =============-===========·--------- M~y 10, 1972 -7:30 p .m . (1) Pledge o f All egiance and Invocation (2 ) Ro ll Ca l l FI LE --····----·"'" AGENDA ADJOURNMENTS POSTED .. .V COMP & M\LEAGE .... ~- F\LES SET UP ...... ~····. RESOLUTIONS CERT\FIED.V"° LETTERS WRITIEN ... ~· MINUTES WRITTEN .... ~ MINUTES l-ILED ..... ~ LETTER .............. ( 3 ) Consider ation of mo ti on to recei v e and file minute excer p ts fro m the various c ities and the County of Oran ge r egarding elect ion s of mayors a nd appointments of a l ternat e s, and seating ~ew members of t he Boards A/C •••. TKLR •••• \ -··-·········""""ff\ s (4) L'I.STRIC'T J. Annual election of Chairman of the Boa rd (5) DISTRICT 2 Annual election of Chairman of t he Board ( ·' \ 0 / DISTRICT 3 Annual election of Ch ai r ma n of the Board (7) D ISrJ:IRIC'l' 5 Annual elec tion of Chai r man of the Board (8) DIS'T-RIC'r 6 Annual election of Chairman o f t he Board (9 ) DISTRICT 7 Annual election cf Chai r man of the Board (1 0) DISTRICT 11 Annual elec tion of Cha i rman of t he Board (11) App oin t ment of Ch airmen pr o tern, if nec e ssary (12) EACH DISTRICT -Cons i-dera·~ i o·n of motions approv:ing mi n utes of the fo l l owing meet i ngs, as mai l r:;d : tV\/s District 1 April 1 2 , 1972 regular ~}--D i strict 2 April 12 , 1 9 ~(2 regul9.r and . .::. April 27 , :!.972 adjourr.ed MJs Distr i ct 3 Apr·il 1 2, 1972 spee:i.a l , April 12, 1 972 r egul a r and April 2 7, 19 7 2 special /Yl/s Di strict 5 April 1 2 ;. 1 97 2 regular /YI 1~ Distriet 6 April l '7 J.. I ' 1972 a djourne d M/.s District 7 April 1 2 , 1 9 72 ad j o·.1rned ·and April 12, 1 972 re g u~ar ('llf S Distr·ict 11 April 1 ? 1 9 72 regul ar and ---' Apri1 27~ J 9 72 spec ial ~ FILE ···-··-·-·-~ (16) F1LE •••••••••••••••••• LETIER ·····-Mi~ A/C •••• TKLR •••• ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman ~. ~~. ~':It \'" .;.o ALL DISTRICTS G~'a ~ .. '.~ Report of the General Manager ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to adopt resolutions expressing appreciation for the services of the following retiring active Directors: John Berton Jerry Christie Robert Clark Alvin Coen John Harper Robert Harvey Dexter Hemeon Edgar Hirth Joseph Hyde Donald Shipley Hal Sims ALL DISTRICTS District No. 3 Districts Nos. 2 & 3 Districts Nos. 2 & 3 District No. 11 District No. 3 District No. 3 District No. 3 District No. 5 District No. 3 District No. 11 Districts Nos. 2 & 3 * * * * * * * CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered separately in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on. th~ consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- FILE ················••(a) lETrER ···-······- A/C __ TKLR - FIL~ ···········-··{b) LETTER ---·- A/C _ •• TKLR •••• ...-.------··- ......--··-·-······· FILE···-·- LETTER -·-·-···-( C) we ___ rnR .... FILE ........... Td) LETTER··-- A/C •••• TKtR -- -·-~ FILr;P ........... ...._ ( e ) LETTER •••••••••••••• A/C •••• TKlR _ (f) FIL! ················~ LETTER •••••••••••••• AIC .... TKLR •••• ---···-·············--........................ .. F;LE ................ (g) LEITER •••••••••••••• A/C .... TKLR ··- i=li"E·~~~=J2:'. LEITER ·········Th) A/C .... TKLR ·-· (i) f,LE ·······-- LETIER ···-- A/C •••• TKLR - ···-··-·-···- ···--·····- Consideration of Resolution No. 72-71, approving plans and specifications for Influent Metering & Diversion Structure at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. I-8-3; and authorizing the General Manager to establish bid date. See page "D" Consideration of Resolution No. 72-72, approving plans and specifications for Additional Secondary Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-9-1, and Water Reuse Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No . J-4-1; and authorizing the General Manager to establish bid date. See page "E" Consideration of _Resolution No. 72-73, approving plans and specifi~ations for Digesters N & 0 at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-21; and authorizing the General Manager to establish bid date.· See page Consideration of Resolution No. 72-7lt, approving plans and specifications for Shops and Warehouse Facilities, Job No. J-13; and authorizing the General Manager to establish bid date. See page Consideration of Resolution No. 72-75, ac~epting Pump Station and Additions to Bypass Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. I-7-3, as complete "F" "G" and authqrizing execution of a Notice of Completion. See page· "H" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2~ to the plans and specifications to Remodel Sedimentation Basins 3 & 4 at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-lR-1, and ~emodel Sedimentation Basins A, B & C at Plant No~ 2, Job No. P2-1R-l, authorizing an additio~ of $377.00, and granting an extension of time of 35 calendar days to the contract with F. T. Ziebarth Company. See page "I" Consideration of Resolution No. 72-76, accepting Remodeling of Sedimentation Basins 3 & ~ at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-lR-1,arid Remodeling Sedimentation Basins A, .B & C at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-1R-l, as complete and authorizing execution of a Notice q.f Completion. See page "J" ·--··-- Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for the Power Reliability Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-20. See page nK" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3, to the plans and specifications for Administration~ Engineering Building Addition, Job .No. J-7-2, and ·Vehicle Maintenance Facilities, Job No. J-12, authorizing an addition of $7,891.36, and granting an extension of time of 30 calendar days to the contract with B. H. Miller Construction Company. See page "L" (18) ALL DISTRICTS ·.~ ~-··········--- LETIER ·····-··- A/C •••• TKLR ·- --·-··-··-··--- -·-··········-······-- Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any ALL DISTRICTS Report of Special Committee on agreement with Orange County Wat~r District to provide 15 mgd secondary treated water for Water District reclamation facility and the right to discharge a like amount of salt brin~s and other residual material to Sanitation District facilities. See pages (1cM}' v· and "N"~ · -·3- (2o) ALL DISTRICTS Consid eration of motion to accept proposal of Ric hard Terry & n lE~J····-e;/ Associ a t es, dated April 18 , 1972 , for preparation , LEmR .\?.§._i\n }(_ of the 1972-73 En vironmental .Impact Statements for treatme nt NC-~~R µI ~ plant improvements , for a maximum fee o f $8 ,500 . See --··-··--page 11 0 11 ~2 1) ::E: .. ~~-l·~··:M \ ~ --................. J -:::B LEITER •••.......•. ,. A/C •••• TKl.R •••• Fl lEv .... ~.{'2 3 ) LEITER ....... -... M ~~~ .. :.·.·---~-~~: ... ·fa l ~ (26) ALL DISTRICTS Consi deration of mo tion ·to -~and file l et ter from Chairman of Orange County ~rd of Supervisors, dated April 1 8 , 1972, in co n necti on with Santa Ana River -Sant i ago Creek Greenbelt Plan, an d r e fer to Executive Committee v,- See page 11 p 11 ALL DISTRICTS H.eport of Commissione r Linsl e y Pa_rs ons , in connection with proposed part ici pa tion in the Southern Cal i fornia Coastal Wa ter Res earch Pro jec t by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Federal Envir onmenta l Pro tec tion Agency. See page· "Q 11 ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of mot ion to r e ceive and file cer t ificat ion of the General Ma n age r that he has c hecked all bi lls appearing on the agend a , found them to be in order , and tp at he rec ommends autho ri za tion for pa yment ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of rol l call vot e motion approving Joint Operating and Ca p ital Out l ay Re volvi ng warrant books for si gnature of the Ch airman of District No . 1, and a u thorizing payment of claims listed on page "A" ALL DISTRIC TS Other bus i ness and communications, if any DI STRICTS 3 & 11 Go 115 id er at ion of 1'1ffi"'tJ:i:-e-:n-a--17"f?-re·w-:h"rg-s-trs·p~e-f.ei.·R<:i-wa.~ropa-n '\; s=, if any . 8ee-p-a-ge "B 11 (27) DISTR ICT 11 G-e··FTS~i'e-il?-6."'&-3:-&F~~-me-t4-&fl: a13p r ov in g warrant s , i: f-a:fl-Y- (28) DISTRICT 11 (29) 11\\$ (30) tllEt> ...... ~ ,\ \ S LEnER .P .. 6. .. _ ~ NC .... TKLR N\ \ ~ (31) Other business and communic a tions, i f any DISTE ICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~" is1 DISTR I CTS 5 & 6 Consideration of motion t o receive and Sile letters from Shuirman-Simpson, Districts 1 consult ing eng ineer dated April 20, 1972, for addit i onal eng i neering services in conn e ction with preparation of plans and specifi cations for Coast Hi g hw ay For c e Ma in, Contra ct No . 5-1 9 ; and approving inprease of b as ic fee for said se rvi ces f r om $37,500. to $42,000. See pages "R" and 11 S 11 DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Con s i der ation of motion a pp roving suspense f und wa rr a nts, if any. See page "B" -4- (32) DI STRICT 5 /.1111$ Consid e ration of motion approving warrants, if any . Vfl ( See page "B" (33) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications, if any ( 34) DISTRICT 5 /'l\l~ Consideration of motion to adjourn ~· . .s.:s- (3 5) DISTRICT 6 eonsider cttion of motion approving warr ants , i--f-a-B.y-.-- -&e-e-pa-ge II c II (3 6) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications, if any (37) DIST RICT 6 A'\.\~ Consideration of mo tion to adjourn 8 '. s:s FI LEtt.V': ......... ( 38) ~:~E-~--;~~·~···:&.\ \ 5 -··-••••••-••u•ih.t -·-··-············~""-® 0 1~~ FILEf). ..... ~-\5 LETIER ........... q A/C ._.TKLR ... . --·······-·········· _ ... _ .......... ..---··"· (40) ~\~ DISTRIC'r 2 Consid erati on of motion approv i ng Addendum No. 3 , to ~he plans and specifications for th e Santa Ana River . 4 "T11 Interc ept or Sewer , Contrac t No . 2 -1 -1. See page DIS'l'RI CT 2 Consideration of R ~solution No. 72-80 -2~pproving requ est of California State College at Fullert on to extend initial bi lling period from one year to 18 months (January 1971 through June 1972), waivin g delinquency charge for 1971; and providing· for subsequent billing periods on a fiscal year basis . See pages "U" and "V" DisrrRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving warrants , if any. See p age "B" --- ~ DISTRICT 2 ~ Other business and communications , if any (4 2) DISTRICT 2 I' df J,~tion of motion to ~urn to May 24, 1972;::ilJ lY/ / :> z:?7 ~ e FllE U .. ~7 <lflliV_ ......... _ N\ j _s A/C .... TKLR .. .. DIS'rRIC'l1 3 ,__- Consideration of ~esolution No . 72-77~3, authorizing execution of Cons~lidation Agreement between_ County Sanitation Districts Nos . 3 and 4, the City of Seal Beach, and the Redevelopment Agency of ,the City of Seal Beach , as prepared by the General Counse l. See page 11 W" /and ~" ~ (Copy in meeti.ng folder) ( 4 4) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving warrants , if any. See page "B" ~~ DISTRICT 3 ~\ Oth e r business and communications , if any (46) M [) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn q~~ -5- (47) ~~ A/C •••• TKlR •••• l ·--··-············M 5 ~-··············(i~-8) :~E;-=it(~ we .... TKl~/ 5 ····-·····-·-n9) FI LE ·······-··-··-· I . LETIER •••••••••••• f{1 5 ~-~~~~:~~: .. ~Jn ls ........... ·-······-··-· (50) FILE •••••••••••••••.•• LETTER ···-·-···i\11~ A/C •... TKLR • .I,.'~ ---·····~ FILB:> ••• ~ •• 01) LETTER ·······-AA l ~ A/C ••.. TKLR .J.f" =~=.:fa\S (52) FILE ················- LEnER ···········fl\\ ,.S A/C -.TKLR -M_ \ s; (53) FILE ·······-··- LETTER ·······-··-{'(\. \ s A/C .... TKLR .... ···-··-·········---/'\ '\ s ···-··-··---x FiLEP. •••••••••..••••• ( 5 4 ) LETTER •••.•••••••••• ~~~~Wl\S --·······--.lY\ S (55) Nt{S iJ~ (57) DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 72-78, accepting Sanitary Sewer Easement from Southern California Edison Company for a permanent easement in connection with construction of Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 1, Contract No. 7-6-1; and authorizing payment in t~e amount of $1,224.00 for said easement. See page Hyli DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Consideration of motion ·approving Change Order No. 7, to the plans and specifications for Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 1, Contract No. 7-6-1, authorizing an addition of $1,960.00 to the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting Company. See page "Z" DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 8, to the plans and specifications for Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 1, Contract No. 7-6-1,· authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities and a total deduction of $7,676.00 to the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting Company. See page "AA" DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 9, to the plans and specifications for Sunflower Interceptor, · Reach 1, Contract No. 7-6-1, granting an extension of time of 16 calendar days to the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting Company. ·See page "BB" DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 72-52, accepting Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 1, Contract. No. 7-6-1, ai complete and authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion. See page "CC" - DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2, to the plans and specifications for Main-Dyer Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26, 27 & 28, Contract No. 1-12, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities and a total addition of $1,760.00 to the contract with Mike Masanovich Construction Company. See page "DD" DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3, to the plans and specifications for Main-Dyer Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26, 27 & 28, Contract No. 1-12, granting an extension of time of 73 calendar days to the contract with Mike Masanovich Construction Company. See page 11 EE" DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 72-79, accepting Main-Dyer Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26, 27 & 28, Contract No. 1-12, as complete and authorizing execution of a JJotice ~f Completion. See page "FF." DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Consideration of motion approving ~uspense fund warrants, if any. See page "C" · DISTRICT 1 80-n-si--d--erat-4-on··of--me-t-iofro appr'ov-ing-· warrants-, -if---any. Sec page "Bn DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn -6- @ DISTRICT 7 ~ Consideration of adoption of Ordinance No. 715, amending _ '~ Ordinance 711, District's Uniform Connection and Use ~~~-1-Ordinance, amending and reaffirming Ordinance 712, and .~:~······-·-repealing Ordinances 713 and 714. See page "GG" >.JC •••• TIC~R -·-·· .. ·· 0) DISTRICT 7 . _ Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from ~-·-··£~ ~-~~\ A/C •••• TKLR - H. Lawson Mead, dated April 20, 1972, Attorney for the proponents of proposed Annexation No. 27 -Mead Annexation; and approving ~equest that final action approving said annexation be postponed ·pending outcome of proceedings to annex said parcel to the City of Orange. See page "HH" --·-·-··-·-( 61 ) ~---·············· LETIER ••..••••.••.•• · AJC •.•• Tti -··-·· 7 -....._ ..... A/C •••. TKLR •••• (62) ®····~\£ (!§9 ...... ___ ff\ A/C •.•• TKLR - (63) FILEC>.. •••• ~-- LETIER ·······-··- DISTRICT 7 Consideration of request of Farrow Development Corp. and First Western Bank and Trust Company to annex portion of Tract 6967 to the District, in the vicinity of Santiago Boulevard and Walnut Avenue. (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff memorandum re proposed annexation. See page "II" Consideration of Resolution No. 72-66-7 ,~uthorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 5 acres of territory to the District (Proposed Annexation No. 29 -Portion of Tract 6967). See page "JJ" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Irvine Industrial Complex, dated April 12, 1972, in connection with construction of Jamboree Subtrunk Sewer (a portion of the Master Plan subtrunk sewe~ system), to approve request to proceed with said construction and declaring intent to enter into standard Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement upon completion. See page "KK" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of items in connection with award of contract for installation of sewers and appurtenances in Assessment District No. 9 (a) A/C •••• TKLR ·-N\ \ $ Consideration of motion to yeceive and file report of Secretary of the Board of Direetors in connection with receipt of sealed proposals for installation of sanitary sewers and appurtenances in Assessment District No. 9. See page "LL" FILE •••••••••••••••••• LETIER .••....•.•••• Q A/C •••• TKLR ••• ~ -·-··-···-·-······· ( (C)1 FILE •••••••••.•.••••••• \.__/ LETIER .•.••.•. =:---, I s A/C •••• TKLR •••• _ m --····-··---(d) FILED~ LETIER.- A/C _TKJJl - Report of Engineer of work. See page "MM" Consideration of motion directini the Secretary of the Board to notify property owners in Assessment District No. 9 of increase in cost to install sanitary sewers in said district, as required under provisions of 1911 Act proceedings. Consideration of motion to ~_ecei ve and _f__ile the following letters from property owners requesting that the Board award contract for installation of sanitary sewers in Assessment District No. 9 to the low bidder, Ramar Company, in the amount of $71,500.00: 1. From Frank F. Mead & Beata G. Mead, dated May 7, 1972. See page "NN" --·--2. From Dr. Sandy G. Mac Pherson, dated May 8, 1972. ---.. -... See page "OO" FILE ···---·--·- LETIER ·-·- A/C _TKlR - -···-·-··-....-. ( e) tf\\5 3. From Speciality Restaurants Corporation, dated May 8, 1972. See page "PP'! 4. Prom Ted G. Hayes, dated ~ay 8, 1972. See page "QQ ll Consideration of Resolution No. 72-81-7 awarding contract for the work described in Resolution of Intention u;. 72-42-7, for installation of sanitary sewers a~d appurtenances in Assessment Distrlct No. 9. See page ''RR" ···7- ~ . (64) DISTRICT 7 M\S Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "C" @ DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications, if any ~· (66) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn Cf':cJ-0 -8- .- II MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, May 10, 1972 7:30 p.m . Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Aven'ue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 May 5, 1972 ATTENTION ALL DIRECTORS : Due to the current construction in Ellis Avenue in the i mme diate vicinity of the entrance to the Administrative · offic es a ll incoming traffic is being detoured. A map has been enclosed with the notice of the meeting to direct vehicular traffic to the Garfield entrance to our treatment facilities . * * * * * * * * * * * * * As a result of the municipal elections in April, the re will be new Directors in most of the Districts . For the new Directors who may not be familiar with our procedures, they require tha t prior to eaeh meeting the General Ma nager submit a report, tog e ther with a formal agenda, to provide background information necess a ry to a concise understanding of' the principal i terns of business to be talcen up. This report is for the next joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of Districts Nos . 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, which meet re g uJ.arly 'together on the second Wednesday of every month at 7:30 p.m., in the Di stricts ' off;ice at the above address. At each of' these joint meetings, the Boards take up items rela ting to joint operations of all the Districts and the individual Boards also take a ction on current business of their respective Districts •. The Board of District No. 8 meets quarter l y in Jul y, October, January and Apri l. * * * * * * * * * * * * * The following is a brief explanation of the more important non- routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are.not attached to the agenda since they a re made up imn1ediately preceding the meeting but will appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting. Joint Boards No. 3 -SEATING OF NEW DIRECTORS: Our office is currently being advised of recent elections of new Mayors , appointment of a lt ernates to the Mayors and other new Directors. A li st of Directors and . alternates compiJ.ed from in.formation recej_ved to date is attached to thi s report. An updated list will be . avai lable at the meeti!l g. Nos. 4 through 10 -ANNUAL ELECTION OF DISTRICT CHAIRMEN: In accor- danc e with the Districts' standard procedures , a chairman for each District Board is elected annually at the reg ular May meeting . The Joint Chairman a nd Vice Joint Chairman are elected at the July meeting, following nominations at the June meeting. The Chairmen for the past year were as follows: District Chairma n Repre senting 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 Lorin Griset Don Smith Jos eph Hyde* Lind s l ey Parsons* Ellis N. Porter Clifton 'Miller Donald E. Shipley* *No longer a Director Santa Ana Orange Lo s Al amitos Newport Beach Co sta Mesa San . Dist . Tus.tin Huntington Beach For the information of the new Directors, the Districts' reg u- l ations provide that each Chairman automatically becomes a member of the Executive Committee which_ ordina rily meets monthly at the call of t h e Joint Chairman . This Committee, which is the only standing com- mittee of the Directors, also includes the Joi nt Ch airman, Vice Joint Ch airman, and the representative of the County Board of Supervisors. Its function is to study and make recommendations to the Joint Boards conc erning joint Districts ' matters such as budgets, salari es, p e r- sonnel, polici es, etc. No. 17 -CONSENT CALE ~IDAR : The follovdng agenda items fall into this category in accordance with the definition estab l ished by the Boards : (a ), (b), (c), and (d) Approval of Plans and Spe cific a tions - Plans and specifica"E:ions for the four remaining Plant jobs budgeted for this fiscal ye a r , as lis ted below, ha ve been completed and are ready for approval and advertising fo r bids. These jobs are a ll eligible for 80 % Fede r al and State financing but owing to a change in the Federal proc e dures, the Districts cannot award con.tracts until a grant offer h as been made without loss of Federal funding . Therefore the resolutions attached to the agenda authorize the General Manager to establish the date of r e ceipt of bids after the grant offer is forthcoming . Also required now is a waiver by the Environmental Protection Agency of its blanlrnt requirement for 85% Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) removal from all treatment plant effluents, whic h requirement cannot now be me t by our Pl ants. However this waiver h a s been applied for and hopefully will be forthcoming in the next few weeks. Th ese jobs and the engineer 's cons truction cost estimates are as follows: -2- Job No. Title Estimate I-8 -3 Influe nt Metering & Diversion St ructure at Rec l amation Pl a nt No. 1 $1,490 ,000 Pl-9 -1 a nd J -4 -1 Add i t i onal Secondary Tr eat me nt a t Reclamation Plant No. 1 a n d Water Re use Facil ities at Pl ant No. 2 $1 ,250,00 0 P2 -2 1 Di ges ters ''N" and ri o " at Tre a t me nt Plant No . 2 $1,050 ,0 00 J -1 3 (e) (f) (h) (i) Shops and Warehouses $ 7 7 0 ,000 Comp letion of Plant Job No . I-7 ~3 -This job, Pump St a t ion and Additions t o Bypass Facilities a t Reclamation Plant No. 1, was s uccessfully c om pleted by the contract or, Healy Tibb e tts Const ructi on Company, and put into operat ion last month. We recommend the customa ry resol ution a ccepting the job as complete on April 14 and authori zing fili ng of a Notice of Comp l et ion . and (g) Complet ion .o.f Plant J ob No . Pl-lR-1 a.nd P2 -1R-l - Thi s Plan-€ job, Remodel Sedimentation Ba sin 3&4 at P l ant No . 1 and Remod el Sedimentation Bas ins A, B, and C a t Pla nt No . 2, was successfully completed on May 3 by the contrac tor s F. T. Ziebarth, Inc. In or d er to clos e out the job we are r ecomm ending Change Order No . 2 whic h adds the sum of $377 to the contr act for addi tiona l work order ed, as described on ·the formal cha nge order attached to the agenda a nd a l s o grants an extension of time of 35 d a y s for the reasons stated in the change orde r. We also recommend the customary resolution accep ting the job as comp lete on Ma y 3 and a uthorizing fi ling of a Notice of Com p l e tion·. Addendum No . l to Pla nt Job No . P2-20 -Th i s job is the Power ReITabiiity Proje ct a t Plant No : 2 and is also elig ible for 80~6 F ederal and State f ina ncing . This recom- mended addendum, as included in the agenda material, post-. pones the bid op ening date to June 15 because .of Federal gran t offer delays as described unde r Items 17 (a-d). This addendum also makes certa in mi nor technic al changes in the specifications. Ch ange Ord er No. 3 to Job No . J-7-2 a nd J-12 -During the c onstructi on of this project, Administrat ion and ·Engineer- ing Building Additions and Vehicle Maintenance Facil ities, the des i rab ili ty of ce rta in chang es invo lving additiona l expense to the contrac tor becru..ne apparent to t he architec t -3- a n d our e n ginee r ing staff. Th e r ecommended c h ange o rde r adding a total of $7 ,891 .36 t o the cont r act i s for the additional work and c h a n g es desc r ibed in the formal c hang e orde r attache d to the agenda. I t wi l l be not ed tha t t he gre a ter portion of thi s sum i s for installa tion of 3,000 feet o f electrica l c a ble to p rovide a new p ower supp l y f or t h e laboratory building . No. 19 -REP ORT OF THE SPECIAL CO MM I TT EE ON AGREEME NT WITH ORANGE COU1ITY WATER DI SrrR ICT: At t h e r e g ular meeting on Ma rch 9 an agree - me n t was consi de r ed wh ich provide d for t he f u rni s h i ng , at no charg e , o f 1 5 mi l lion g a l l ons pe r d a y of s e condar y treat e d was tewater by the Districts to the Or ang e Coun t y Water District and the acceptance of an equivalent am ount o f brine wastes from t he Water Di s trict 's se a wa t er de s a l ting -s e\vag e r e c l am at ion p lant . The a g reeme nt a l s o contains provi sions for other l ess sig nific ant a rea s of mutu a l cooperation b etwe e n the two a g encies. Be c ause of an obj e c tion r ais e d to the wo r ding of c e rt ain p o rtions of t he ag reement, a Spe c i al Committee c onsisting of Di r e c tor s Don McJ.nni s (Chairman), Don Smith and Henr y Wedaa wa s app oint e d to study the ma tter and to r e p o rt to the Joint Boards in t wo mo n t hs . In t h e interim the Comm itte e h a s be e n pur suing its a s signment d iligently and is p r e p a red to repo r t a s dire cte d. I nclude d wit h the a g enda ma t eri a l i s a staff mem o r andwn s umm arizing charges made for r e claime d wate r by o t her agencies i n this are a . Al so inc luded is a copy of t he Commit tee's Ma rch 30 s uggested r e vision o f the origi nall y presen ted a g r e e me nt . No . 20 -PROP OSAL FOR PREPARATIO N OF ENV I RO NMENTAL IMPAC T S'r ATEM ENT S : At t he reg ula r me eting j .n April the Bo a rds, a t the r e c.omrnend a tion o f t he Exec u tiv e Committ e e " di r ected t h e General Manage r to o btain a propos a l from Ri c h a r d Te r ry a nd As s o ci a te s , of Anah eim, to p r ep are En vi r onme nt a l n npact Stateme nt s for projec ted 1972-73 Pl ant con- s t ruction. This firra 1 s p roposal i s inc luded in the age n da ma te r ial and we re c orrune nd i ts a cc e ptance . Th e staff i s particularly a nxious t o p roceed · wi th these s t ate- me nts since they a re r equire d for any Federa l or St a t e assis te d project pri or to filing app licati on f or grant s and we be lieve it desira b l e to fi le suc h a p plic a tion at the e a rlies t possib le d a te. The sta ff has asked Te r ry and Associate s t o prepare t wo sta te- ments, on e for the expect e d n e c e ssa ry additi on of a h i g her degre e of treatme nt at Pla nt No. 1 and t h e s e cond for ot.he r Plant i mp rovem ents and additions. Dividi ng the prepar a tion o f the stat eme nts into two par ts wi ll allow t he f i rm to c on centrate on t h e improv ed deg r ee o f treatme nt p ortion o f t he work in o r d e r tha t a t a r get d a te o f Au g u s t 1 f or subm ittal of the r e port fo r t his p or tion o f t h e Plant work can be met . The ot her r eport i s sche duled f or c omp leti on and subm i t t a l on Octobe r 1 . No . 2 1 -SANT A ANA RIVER-SA NTIA GO CREEK GREE NB ELT PIJi.N: Included in t he a g enda ma t e rial is a l e t t er d a ted Ap r i l 18 from Director Casp ers , Chair man of the Oran g e County Boar d of Superv i s ors , re ques t ing the Distr icts to a dop t a resolution approvi ng t h e p rog r am . The st a ff -4 - r e comm e nds tha t this matte r be re ferred to the Execut i ve Committe e for s t udy and recomm e ndat i on to t he Joint Boar ds at t h e June mee ting . No . 22 -SO UTHERN CALIFO RN IP4 COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT ( SCCWRP) : For the informa t i on of the new Dire ctor s , t h is project is a r esear c h effort bein g participated in by five of the maj or Southe r n Ca lifornia d ischa rgers of was tewater to the ocea n , County of Ventura , Los Angeles County Sanitation Di stricts, City of J.Jos Jmg e le s, County o f San Dieg o, and our D:Ls trict s . Since its incep tion in 196 9 former Di rec t or Lindsley Parsons h a s be en the rep re sentative of the Districts on the governing body of the p r oject. Mr. Pars ons h a s requested that the materi a l , included with the agend a , -be presented to the Directors for t his meeting. It i s be lieved that t h is material i s large ly sel f- explanatory but Mr c Parsons will be present to make a repo:rt and answer any ques tions the 'Di.r ectors may h ave. Districts Nos. 5 an d 6 No . 30 -.INCREASE IN ENGINEER ING FEE FOR CO NTRACT NO, 5-19 : This cont r a ct f or t he installn.tion of a 24-inch maste r plan paral lel forc e main sewer f r om Rocky Point t o the Santa Ana River sipl1on wi l l be ready for a dve r tisin g for bid~ in June . From Rocky Point to Bitter Point the force ma in will be installe d in Pad.fi e Coast Highway, with the remain ing portion. constructed in a Dis tr:i_c t s 1 m•me d easement thr oug h the Banni ng property . During the course of the design, the staff sugge sted that cert a in nec essary remedial work on the existing Dist.:rict g r avi ty sewer in the highway fr om the Arc h es northwesterl y to Bitte r Point be includ ed in this contract. It i s n eces sary that this work be accomplished in the nea r future and it appears t hat it can be don e more ec onom ically as a part of the fo r ce ma in cont r a ct , wh ich procedure will a lso e limi nate the necessity of' two separate c ons truction job s in the hj.ghway . Ac cord ingl;>r , we as ke d the Di stricts' engineer to s u bmit prop o sals fo r this extra work to be .added to his basic fee ($37,500) fo r the design of the for ce main .. Copies of t h e s e prpp osal s are includ ed i n t he agenda materia l and it i s recomme n d ed that the y be ac c epted and the basic design fee be i ncre ased by t h e sum o f $4,500 t o a new lump swn fee of $42,000. Di strict No. 2 No. 38 -ADDE NDUM NO , 3 TO CONTHA CT NO . 2 -14 -1: Bids for this contract f or the construction o f the fi r st reach of the Santa Ana River Inter- ceptor Sewer (f rom Pl ant No . 1 to Kat ella Avenue) wi ll b e opened on May 1 1 . Scheduling of this work a ...r1d additional reaches of the i nter - c epto r was extensively discuss e d at the adjoul'ne d meeting on Ap ril 2 7 in connection with a reque s t for annexation o f land in the Santa Ana Canyon area east of the pr esent District.. Su bse quent to a dvertisi ng for b id the District's eng inee r and staff have concluded tha t certain change s in the contra ct documents should be mad e wh ich a re incorpo- r ated in Addendum No. 3 (copy included in the agenda material). Th e addendum requires the contrac t o r to n am e the manufacturer who will -5·· furnish the pipe> adds inadvertently omitted u..nit p ric es for additional b eddin g g r ave l and malces revisions in the specifications fo r the internal vinyl plastic ·liner :Lnstalled by the pipe manufacture r. The latte r change will have the effect of increasing competition for the supplying of this material. We recommend adoption of the addendum. No. 39 -REQUES T OF CAL STATE FULLERTON FOR DEFERRAL OF USE . CHARGES : Included in the agenda material is a l etter dated Apr i l 28 f rom Ca lifornia State College at Fullerton requesting a deferment to July 1 of billing for 1971 use charges . The request a l so asks the Board to waive the established delinquency cha r ge and to allow billing in the future on a fiscal year basis. For the information of the new Directors, a ll District s adopted a uniform connection and 'use ordinance which b.ecame effective J anuary 1, 1971. This ordinance establishes connection and use charges for large waste producers , with a credi t · for the ass e ssed valuation of the estab lishment . Since t h e college has no assessed v a luat ion., the computed use cha r ge for 1971 a-mounted to $1 ~982 .23 . We recommend app roval of the college's r eques t. Di strict No . 3 No. 43 -APPROVAL OF CONSOLIDATION AGREEMENT WITH.D I STRICT NO. 4 : Thi s con s olidation 1•1as discussed extens ive ly at an adjourned meeting of the Board on April 21, meeting jointly with the Board of Di rect ors of District No . J-1-. After the agreement s ubmitted at that time fai l ed to receive a u n animous vote as requi red by l aw to avoid an e l ec tion in both Di s tric ts, the staff was instructed to place the ma t ter on the ag~nda for this meeting . For the bene fit of the n ew Directors , District No . 4 consists of the older part of Seal Beach, the northerly portion of t.he City being already within District No . 3 . The consolidation will permit Di strict No . 4 to take out of service an exi sting treatment p l ant di schar ging to the San Gabriel River estuary and divert the flm<T to a n existing District No. 3 pump station at Se al Beach Boulevard and Westminster Avenue . The proposed consolidation agreement is being prepare d by the General Coun se l and a copy will be f urni shed each Dire ctor at the meeting . Distric ts Nos . 1 and 7 No . 47 -PURCHASE OF EASEMENT: The staff h a s settled for the s um of $1 ,224 for a n e cessary easement f or t he Sunflower Interceptor across Edison Company r ight of way adjacent to the east side of the Santa Ana River . We recomme nd approval o f the purchase a n d acceptance of the easement . Nos. 48 through 51 ~ CLOSEOUT OF CONT RACT NO. 7-6-1: This $2 .3 mi llion project with Sully-Mi ller Contracting Compar1y was satisfactorily comp leted on Ma rch 25. We therefore rec ommend formal acceptance by -6- the Boa r d and authorization for filing of Notice of Com p l etion (Item No . 51). It em No. 48 is recommended Change Order No . 7 adding $1,960 to the contract price for the reason explained in the formal change order included with the agenda ma terial . Item No . 49 is Change Order No. 8, the customary adjustment of quantiti es deducting the sum of $7,676 from the contract prj_ce to reflect quantities of material actua lly insta lled on a unit pr:i..ce basis as compared with the quantities orig inally estimated. Item No . 50 is Ch ange Order No. 9 grant ing an extension of time of 16 days for the reasons stated on the change order form. Nos. 52 throug h 54 -CLO SE OUT OF CONTRA.CT NO, 1-12: This $475,000 proj ect with Mike Masanovich Const ruction Co., Inc., was satisfactorily comp l eted on May 5, Recommended Change Order No. 2 (Item No. 52) is the customary adjus t ment of quantities adding .the sum of $1 ,760 to the cont ract price to ref l e ct quantitl.es of material actually installed. on a unit price basis as compared with the quantit ies originally esti- mat ed . It em No. 53 is Change Order No. 3 granting an extensi on of time of 73 days to the contract for the reasons stated in the formal change order. Item No. 54 is the r e commended resolut ion accepting the work as complete and authorizing filing of a Notice of Completion. District No . 7 No . 59 -ADOPTIO N OF ORDINANCE NO. 715: This ordinance, copy included with the agen da material, is scheduled f or adoption at this mee ting "in order that it may g o into effec t July 1 . The Directors will recall that its adoption earlier '!:ms d e l ayed in order to allow the required 30 days to notify affected persons and agencies prior -to adoption. This notice was mailed on March 29. Tne ordinance, which has been thoroug hly discussed at earlier Board meetings, basically provides for an increas e in connection fees for multiple dwelling units from the pres ent $15 0 to $250. No . 60 -REQUEST FOR DEL..~Y-I N PROCEEDINGS ON AN1TEXATION NO . 27: L11clu ded in the agenda mat e rial is a letter f rom the attorney for the proponents of this 1 20-acre annexat ion requesting that the Board delay approval of the annexation, pending annexation of t he same parcel to the City of Orange. We recommend approval of the request. No. 61 -PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TRACT 692·7: It will ·b e recalled that this 5-acre proposed annexation on Santiag o Boulevard was referred to the staff for report at tr.i.is meet ing . This re.port . i·s included in the agenda material and finds that the proposed annexat i on conforms with District policy . We therefore recommend the resolution i ncluded with the agenda mat erial (It em No. 6l(b)) authorizing initiation of annexation proceedings. · No. 62 -AUTHORIZING IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX TO PROCEED WITH THE CO NS TRU CTIO N OF THE JAMBO REE SUBTRUl\TK SE~·JER: Included with the agenda ma terial is a l etter from the Complex on this subject. We rec ommen d approval of the request. -7- • No. 63 -REPORT ON ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO . 9: Bids for the instal- l ation of sewer s in this District we re opened on May 2 (b id tabula tion included in the agenda material ). The Eng ineer of Wo rk will report o n the status of this project. P aul G. Brown Assis t ant Gene ral Man ager -8- . . DIRECTOR LIST Agency ~IES Anaheim Brea Buena. Park Cypress Fountain Valley Fullerton Huntington Beach Irvine Laguna Beach La Ha.bra La Palma Los Alamitos Newport Beach Orange Placentia Santa Ana Seal Beach Stanton Tustin Villa Park Yorba Linda SANITARY DISTRICTS Costa Mesa San. Dist Garden Grove San. Dist. Midway City San. Dist. South Laguna San.· Dist. Name Mark A. Stephenson Donald L. Fox Jesse M. Davis Otto Lacayo Edward E. Just George B. Scott Robert E. Root Norma Gibbs Jack Green Henry H. Duke Henry Quigley Richard Goldberg William H. Roberts Charles Stevens, Jr Cor Vanderwaal Charles Long Carl Kymla. Donald Mc Innis John Store Howard Rogers Don Smith Robert Finnell Lorin Griset Wade Herrin H. K. Holden Alicita Lewis Clifton Miller Donald Winn Henry Wedaa. Ellis N. Porter Nonnan E. Culver Derek McWhinney Clay N. Mitchell District No/s 2,3 2,3 3 3 2 3 2,3 11 3 11 7 8 2 3 3 3 5 5 6 7 2,7 2 1,7 2,3 3 3 1,7 2 2 1,6,7 2,3 3 8 \ COUNTY AREAS Chainnan of the Board of Supervisors Ronald W. Caspers 5,6,8 Member of the Board of Supervisors David L. Baker 11 Member of the Board f Supervisors Robert W. Battin 1,3 ~mber of the Board of Supervisors Ralph B. Cla~k 7 Member of the Board of Supervisors William J. Phillips 2 5/5/72 Alternate Jack C. Dutton Tom Kowalski Ralph K. Hines Alice Frankiewich Al Hollinden Al Hollinden Louis Reinha.rdt Alvin M. Coen Alvin M. Coen Alvin M. Coen William Fischbach Charles Stevens,Jr William H.· Roberts Edward J. Byrne Kenneth Miller Donald Mc Innis Richard Croul Donald Mc Innis Donald Mc Innis Jess Perez Robert Langer Wade· Herrin Lorin Griset Thomas Barnes Albert Nuijens Ralph Welsh Dorothy M. Potter Rudy Castro Ronald w. Caspers Ronald w. Caspers Ronald w. Caspers Ronald W. Caspers i!:EET ?4-JG DATE __ na.......;· y~l_O ...;_, _1_9_7_2_ TI ME 7 :30 p .m. D IST R ICT S 1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ,7 & 1 1 3D I STRICT 1 ACTIVE DIRECTORS \HE RRIN) ...... GR I S ET ...... V (CASPERS ) ..... BATTIN .•.... §/: === === -(coco) ........ MILLER ....•. PO RTER •.••. ·----vL= === === .,nIST RICT 2 HILEMAN).···· SMITH '.·····~---- . CULVER . • . . . ---- (LANGER) .•..•• FINNELL.... ---- (KO WA LS KI) .•.. FOX ........ ---- (GR I SET ) ...... HERRIN . . . . . __ -- (HOLLINDE N) ... JUST.;..... ___ _ (ROBE RTS ).···· NEVIL...... ---- (CASPERS ) ..... PHILLIPS... --__ (REI NH ARDT) ... ROO T....... ___ _ ~DUTT ON) ••.... ST EPHE NSON . ___ _ CAST RO) ....•. WED AA. ..•... _Y....J' ___ _ POTTE R) ••.••• WI Nr-.l •.•...• _lL_ ___ _ I I JOINT BOARDS ACTIVE DI RECTORS CHOLLI NDEN) ... JUST ....••.. ~ __ (--c.ASE.ERs) ••••• BAKE R ..••••. ~ (-eA"St'1:RS) ..... BATT IN· . · ..• -1L--=== ®At'.l PE RS ...•• ~ __ (~p..&R-S) ..... CLAR K· · · .. · . __ CULVER·······~ (HINES)····.·· DAVIS······· ~== (COEN )······· ·DUKE ········ ~-­ (LANGER) ••. • •• FINNELL····· --=--r--~ ~~g~~r~:~:::: :~fiii: ::: ::: ~ === (co_ EN) ........ GREE N .•....• =rz; -- 4DISTRICT 3 ~ I (CASPERS).···· BATTIN..... :;/--v (HE RRIN)····· ·GR I SE T· · · · • · -::7:--- (GR I S ET ) •... · ·HERRIN ······ °7 -- (BARNES) •... · · HO l...DEN • • • • • • ~ -- (MC I NNIS) ..• • l<YM LA· · · • · • · ~ -- (FRANK! EWICH) ·LACAYO ······ ~ -- (NUIJE NS) ••... LEW I S ······· -jr -- (MI LLE [<) •• ····LONG ········ -:--r -- (CROUL ) •..•.. ·MC I NNIS · · • · --1L....L -- MC WH I NN EY· • ..// --' (WELSH)······ ·MILLER······ ~-­ (ROBERT S)···· ·NEVIL.······' 7 --CULVER ..•.• --1.L.~ v (HINE S ).······ DAY IS··· ... ~~~ KOVJA~S KI) • • · FOX · · · · · • • • -- COENJ· • · · · · · · GREEN . . . . . . __ __t,. ~FRAN l<JE W IC H~ LACAYO·.··· ± __ ~ (NU I JENS) • • • · LEWIS·· •... _L __ ~ ~MILLE R}····· LONG ··· .... ~--· ~v / GRISET} ..... HERRIN····· __ CBARNES} •.••• HO LDEN . . . . . . --- MC WHINNEY. --d __ ~ (REI NHARDT) ••. ROOT······· ~ _ (HOLLINDEN) ··SCOT T·····. (DUTTON )····· S TEPHENSON. === . (ROBERTS )···· ST EVEN S.·.· ===z:_ (BYRNE)······ VANDERWAAL. =z=·=== :=iZ: -i..D ISTRI CT 5 ~(BAKER) ....••. Gi°:SPERS.... ·~ ___ _ MC IN NIS) •.. KYM LA ....•.• ~z -_-_- CROUL) ..•..• MC INNIS •.. 2 DISTRICT 6 PORTER· · · • · _L ___ _ (PHILLIPS)··· ··6':8PE~&· · .. ~ ___ _ (MC INNI S )··· ·STORE······ --4,L ___ _ ~DISTRICT 7 '7 /£@ (WELSH)······ ·MILLER····· ~~ ~« (CASPERS)·····CLAR K······ =:.:2"' ~ (HERRIN) ..•.•• GRI S ET...... t;F:~ PORTER ••.... ~ ~ (~ISCHBAC~) ••. QUIGLEY..... __i.c_~~. ~ INNIS) ••.• "@OL~~...... ---1.L:~ CPEREz) •.••.•. SMITH .•...•• __ -4.L _lL._ 2 ~~::~~;:/~. ··BAKER • • · · · · ~/ -- (COEN).······· DUKE • • . . . . . 'l.,t./i6 -- (COEN).······· ·&lBBS·...... . ---- DISTRICT 8 ·~~ ~ . DBERG • • · ---- (CLAR td· · • • • • • CAS ,RS · • · · ---- MITCHELL • • • ----- 5/9/72 ( GA-Si""ER-S) • • • • ·?HI LL I P S • • • • -7 --· POR T ER· • • • • · -=-r -- (FI SCHB A\H). ··QUI GLEY·····~ -- (MC I NN I s) •.. -.. ~8.@.~l~S •• • • • • -7: __ ROOT' •... •••• _JL.,L' - (HOLLINDEN) ···SCOT}······· ~ -- (PEREZ) · · · • • • • SM IT i-l • • • • • • • ~ -- ' (DUTTON)······ STE PH ENSON·· ~ -- 1 (ROBER T S) • • · · ·ST EVENS · · · · • -7 __ · {MC I NN I S)··· ·STORE ······· ~-­l (BYRNE)······ ·VAND ER\-1/AAL· • v ./ __ I . -~~ \CA S T RO) • • • • • ·WED AA · • · · • • · --- 1 (POTTER )····· ·WIN N········ ___ _ I l OTHERS * * * * * GOLDBERG· • · • ---- Ml TCHELL • • • • ---- HARPER BROvm SYLVESTER LE WIS DUNN CLA RK E SIGLER NISSON TAYL OR BRO WN BOETTNER CARL SON FIN STER GALLOWA Y HOH EN ER Hm~ARD HUNT KEITH LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON MURO NEY PIERS ALL STEVENS ~':EET fNG DATE __ Ma_y_1_0_, _1_9_7_2 _ TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 DISTRICT 1 ACTIVE DIRECTORS ------. TH ERR IN) •••••• GR I SET .••••• _./_ ---- ~CASP[:Rs) .•••• BATT.IN •••••• _./ ____ _ ' C 0 C 0 ) • • • • • • • • M I LL ER. • • • • • ./ --r----PORTER ••• ; •• -. ____ _ DISTRICT 3 ~1 (CASPERS).···. BATTIN ••••• _..;_ w"'1 __ CULVER.· ••• ·i-"---~--- (H It~ES ). • • • • •• DAV IS •••• 1~"f~-~--_./ __ _ ( KO~lAl-S KI) • • • FOX • • •••••• -" ___ ..,; __ _ (COEN).······· GREEN •••••• -"-__ / __ _ (FRANKIErlICH~ LACAYO· •••• -~-__:!__ __ (NUIJENS) • • • • LEWIS·· •. ~· _J _ _L __ (MILLER} · • • • .• LONG •.••••• -"-__ I __ _ (GR I SET}· • • • • HERRIN • •• • • _, ___ ../ __ _ (BARNES}····· HOLDEN ••••• _1 ___ i __ _ MC WHINNEY. _1 ___ .; __ _ (RE I NHARDT) ••• ROOT· • • • • • • _.1_ --"'--~­ (HOLL I NDEN) • · SCOTT.· •••• _,_ --"-__ (DUTTON) • • • • • STEPHE~~SON. _I ___ .,,_ --·- (ROBERTS) • • • • STEVENS···· .; " (BYRNE) • • • • • • VANDERWAAL. ~ ./ == DISTRICT 5 ~.BAKER) •••••• ~CASPERS •.•• MC INNISJ ••• KYMLA •.•.•• CROUL) •••••• MC INNIS ••• DISTRICT 6 .,/ ------ _./_ ---- "' PORTER· • • • • _./ ____ _ (PH I LLI PS)···· CASPERS'···· _./_ ---- (MC INNIS)····STORE······ _./ ____ _ DISTRICT 7 1 ,,.-~ / d ( \'IELSH) · • • • • • ·MILLER· • • • • ./ ..; ., (CASPERS)·····CLARK······ ~ ~ ~ (HERR I N) · ••••• GR I SET •••••• -<---"'-· _ti - PORTER •••••• -'---"--'-r .. T SCHBAC~) ••• QUIGLEY ••••• --7--~-__ v _ ~ INNIS).· •• ROGE~5 •••• •. ----~---" - (PEREZ).······ SMITH •••••.•• -L. _./_ -~ DISTRICT 11 (CASP~RS)· • • • • BAKER •. • • • • • ~ ------ ( "'61!N) · • · . • • • • DU KE • • • • ~ :. ~\.--~------( c OEN,·· • • • • · • C-IBBS ••••••• _L_ ___ _ DISTRICT 8 GOLDBERG • • • ------ (CLARK)······· CASPERS • • • • ------ MITCHELL.·· ------ 5/9/72 JO I NT EO,~RDS ACTIVE DIRECTORS (HOLLI NDEN) •.• JUST •••••••• _I __ _ (CASPERS) ••••• BAKER....... ./ __ (CASPERS) ••••• BATTIN •••••• ~ __ · C»::SF~~s ••••• (CASPERS) ••• ··CLARK·······---;;--== CULVER······ ~ (HIN ES)· • • • • • ·DAV IS· • • • • • • -,;--- (COEN)········ DU KE········ ~ == .(LANGER)··.: •• FI NM ELL····· + -- (KOWAL-SKI).·. ·FOX········· ___ _ (COEN)·~······ SIB~······· _v' __ _ (COEN)·· • • • • • ·GREEN· • • • • • • _/ __ _ (HERRIN)····· ·GRISET· • • • • • -"--· - (GRISET). ·.···HERRIN······_,,,.,_ -- (BARNES) •.• ·.·HOLDEN······ -/--- (MC INN Is) ... · KYMLA"· •• •• · • -"'--- ( FRANKI EWI CH) ·LACAYO.·····_..,,,_ -- (NUIJENS) •• ···LEWIS······· -.,,/--- (MILLER)····· ·LONG········_.,_ -- (CROUL). ······MC INNIS····_.,_ -- MC WHINNEY· • -~--- (WELSH)······ ·MILLER······-"'--- (ROBERTS)····· NEVIL······•.-" --- (CASPERS)···· ·PHILLIPS····-"'--- PORTER· • • • • • _,,,_ --~FISCHBACH)·.· QUIGLEY····· -"'---\MC INNIS) •••• R-GGERS ••• · ••• _..,,, __ _ ROOT •••••••• _.,, --- (HO LL I NDEN) ···SCOTT· • • • • • • _J_ -- (PEREZ)·· • • • ··SM I TH···· • • • -./--- (DUTTON) • · • ···STEPHENSON·· -·'--- (ROBERTS)····· STEVENS····· -' --- ! (MC INNIS)··· ·STORE······· _I __ _ (BYRNE) • • • • • • • VANDERWAAL • • _.1 _ ---- (CASTRO)····· ·WEDAA· • • • • • .. • + -- (POTTER)···· · ·WINN····· • • • --. __ OTHERS * * * * * GOLDBERG· • • • ---- MITCHELL· • • • ----- BOETTNER CARLSON FINSTER GALLOWAY HOH EN ER HOWARD HUNT KEITH LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON MU RONEY PIERSALL STEVENS Q . ,,, '. { .• ,,~ ~1\4-,.:., ~ v '-"" . Chairman Just Call meeting of the Executive Committee for 5:30 p.m., Wednesday, May 31st. Invite Directors Donald Fox and Robert Root, or Directors Vanderwaal and Long. Indoctrination and tour of treatment facilities for the new Directors to be held 5:30 to 8:30 p.m., May 17th or 18th. A light dinner will be served approximately 6:30 p.m. (Ask for hand count on the number of Directors attending). -"i -~ ,.·, .--~ I RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ·May 10, 1972 -7:30 p.m . . ,. :~ WAnRANT NO. J'7864 ~865 .1(866 17867 17868 17869 17870 17871 17872 17873 17874 17875 17876 17877 17878 17879 17880 17881 17882 17883 17884 17885 17886 17887 17888 17889 17890 17891 17892 17893 17894 17895 17896 17897 17898 17899 17900 17901 17902 17903 17904 17905 17906 17907 17908 17909 17910 17911 17912 J7913 '914 ~915 17916 17917 17918 17919 17920 17921 17922 17923 17924 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF A-1 Equipment Rentals, Equipment Rental $ Adams-Sullivan Inc., Conveyor Parts Adept Mfg. Inc., Rotor Repair All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings Allied Bolt & Supply Co., Hardware Alpine Aromatics, Inc., Odor Control Chemicals American Lock & Supply, Inc., Hardware American Standard, Inc., Bearings City of Anaheim, Power Anaheim Sewer Construction, Lateral Repair The Anchor Packing Co., Pump Packing Applied Science Laboratories, Inc., Lab Supplies Associated Concrete Products, Manhole Rings Associated Laboratories, Lab Testing Azusa Western, Cement Gerald Baldwin, CWPCA Conference Expense Barnes Delaney, Conveyor Parts Bassett Office Furniture Co., Office Furniture Bearing Specialty Coo, Bearings Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams Buckeye Brass Foundry, Inc., Pump Parts (MO 2-9-72) Burke Engineering Co., Controls C & R Reconditioning Co., Shaft & Pump Repair California Collator Sales, Binding Supplies State of Calif. Public Employees Retirement System, Retirement System Administrative Fee Leonard Carney, CWPCA Conference Expense John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services. Castle Controls, Inco, Valves Certified Laboratories, Inc., Solvent R.B. Clapp Co., Inco, Controls Clark Dye Hardware, Tools Clark Equipment Company, Wheel Loader Parts W.No Clarke, CWPCA Conference Expense College Lumber Company, Building Materials · Concrete Coring Company. Core Drilling Consolidated Elect. Distr. Inc., Electrical Supplies Constructors Supply Co., Tools & Supplies Control Specialists, Inc., Compressor Parts Cook & Tillitt Freight Service, Inco, Freight Paul A. Cooper, Grit Removal Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa County Water District, Water County of Orange, Tract Maps County Sanitation District of L.A. County, Oil Disposal Curtin Scientific Co., Lab Supplies Daily Pilot, Employment & Leg9l Ads Daniels Tire Service, Tire Repair John M. Deck, Equipment Parts DeGuelle & Sons Glass Co •• Truck Parts & Repair Diesel Control Corp., Engine Repairs Dominguez Marine & Industrial Supply, Valves T.A. Dunn, CWPCA Conference Expense E 0 I. DuPont De Nemours & Co., Training Manuals Eastman Inc., Office Supplies Enchanter, Inco, Ocean Research & Monitoring Enterprise Printing Co., Printing FMC Corporation, Shaker Parts Fairfax Electronics, Inc., Comrnunication·Equipment Fibre Glass Evercoat Co., Inc., Mtce. Supplies Fischer & Porter Co., Instrumentation Fisher Controls Co., Compressor Parts A-1 AMOUNT 15075 321.30 140.00 229020 172.80 546000 155019 1,370.90 15.04 50.00 164.77 156 093 140025 17.00 106. 51 71.19 30.'35 57.17 982.68 ·37.50 3,396.48 367.08 795.00 145c.60 -156 .oo 67.69 208.46 '91.42 309.61 989.29 16.38 61.50 89.90 395.95 162.00 1,791.98 496094 77.89 17.49 l,008o00 197.97 6000 6.oo 116014 112.45 46.18 28.00 8.46 75.89 458.47 2,998.81 73.69 512.40 195.20 2,070.00 74.39 120.70 560050 112.56 546.38 265016 WARRANT NO. 17925 17926 17927 -'"7928 .,.,929 17930 17931 17932 17933 17934 17935 17936 17937 17938 17939 17940 17941 17942 17943 17944 17945 17946 17947 17948 17949 17950 17951 17952 17953 17954 17955 17956 17957 17958 17959 17960 17961 17962 17963 17964 17965 17966 17967 l7968 17969 17970 17971 17972 17973 17974 17975 17976 17977 ,7 978 ~979 17980 17981 17982 17983 17984 17985 17986 17987 17988 IN F.AVOR OF William H. Fox, Employee Mileage & CWPCA Conf. Expo $ Freeway Machine & Welding Shop, Machining (MO 2-1-72) Garden Grove Lumber & Cement Co., Bldg. Mat 1 ls. General Electric Supply Co., Electrical Supplies General Telephoqe Co. of Calif. Georgia-Pacific Corpo, Chlorine Graybar Electric Company, Inc., Electrical Supplies Green Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Dr. Ro Monte Greinetz, Employee Mileage Charles G. Hardy, Inc., Hardware Fred Ao Harper, Various Mtgs. & CWPCA Conf. & COD Exp. Hertz Equipment Rentai Corp., Equipment Rental · Hewlett Packard Co., Lab Supplies Hilti Fastening Systems, Hardware · Howard Supply Co., Piping Su~plies City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Beach Art Gallery, Frames Industrial Water Conditioning, Lab Equipment Rental International Harvester, Co., Truck Parts. J & M Service, Equipment Parts Kar Products, Inc., Hardware Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies King Bearing, Inc., Bearings S.P. Kinney Engineers, Inc., Recirculation Strainers Kleen Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tools & Hardware L & N Uniform Supply Coo, Uniform Rental The Lacal Company, Inco, Pump Packing Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Sweeper Parts WoH. Landon, CWPCA Conference Expense Judy Lee, Employee Mileage Liquid Carbonic Corpo, Lab Supplies Mc Coy Ford Tractor, Tractor Parts Mesa Supply, Engine Parts J.Co Meyer, Lab Equipment Paul :Munroe H~rdraulics, Inc., Pump Munselle Supply Company, Inc., Safety Equipment National Chemsearch Corp., Solvents City of Newport Beach, Water c. Arthur Nissen, Gen'l. Counsel Retainer & Fees Noland Paper Company, Inc., Reproduction Paper ODA Nursery, Sh~ubbery Orange County Radiotelephone Orange County Stamp Co., Office Supplies Pacific Telephone · M.C. Patten & Co., Inc., Boiler Parts Perkin Elmer Corp., Lab SuppJ.ies John J. Phillips,1Employee Mileage Pomeroy, Johnston & Bailey, Lab Testing Postmaster Douglas E. Preble, Employee .Mileage The Register, Employment Ad Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Steel & Aluminum Stock Robbins & Myers, Inc., Test Materials San Bar, Ecological Research Supplies Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Supplies Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Rewind Sargent.Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies Smith Optical Service, Safety Glasses Southern Calif. Edison Co. Southern Calif. Gas Coo Southern Calif. Water Co. A-2 .AMOUNT 57.46 5,650073 126 •. ., 4 160.86 1,903.59 1,468.38 683.08 125037 34.86 120.-07 292.84 106005 94.50 35049 1,405.24 33.93 74.97 40.00 82078 9o07 459 .oo 432.69 167.22 1, 718. 4c'.» 361.54 24.26 593097 1,943.07 201.38 7.74 138065 21.45 454.25 6.38 242.76 38.00 324.83 40.43 91.35 153053 728045 351.23 40o43 49046 6.49 380.20 199.50 7.19 103.80 12050 50Q.OO 45.54 27.36 1,125.04 281.40 80.01 132025 86016 41060 150049 . 35070 17,487.00 691.78 3.39 WARRANT NO. 17989 17990 17001 ..., I J./ ..._ 1 7992 993 17994 17995 17996 17997 17998 17999 18000 18001 18002 18003 18004 18005 18006 18007 18008 18009 18010 18011 18012 18013 18014 18015 18016 18017 18018 18019 18020 18021 18022 18023 18024 18025 18026 18027 18028 18029 18030 18031 18032 J8033 ~034 10035 18036 IN FAVOR OF Southwest Processors, Oil Removal Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Distilled Water Speed-E Auto PartB, Trucl{ Parts Standard Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline John W. Stang Corp., Pump Parts Starow Steel, Steel Supelco, Inc., Lab Supplies J. Wayne Sylvester, CASA Meeting Expense T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Tractor Parts Tardif Sheet Metal, Aluminum Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage (2 Months) Tony's Lock & Safe Service, Hardware Thomas L. Torres Trucking, Freight Transport Clearings, Freight Harry Twining, Employee Mileage U.S. Equipment Co., Inc., Compressor Parts Union Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline Union Sign Co., Signs United States Helium, Lab Supplies United Technology Center, Pipe VTN, Reproduction of Plans Vaniman Camera, Photo Supplies & Services John R. Waples R.S., Odor Consultant Robert A. Webber, Employee Mileage & CWPCA Conf. Exp. Western Salt Co., Salt.for Conditioners Russ Wold, Employee Mileage World Travel Bureau, Inco, Meeting Travel Expenses Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage· Xerox Corp., Reproduction Service Everett H. York Co., Filters Zodiac Paper Co., Printing Supplies TOTAL JOINT OPERATING CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Ace Automotive Equipment Co., Shop Equipment $ Carollo & Keith, Survey I-8 John Carollo Engineers, Engineering -Plant Constr. County of Orange, Compaction Test I-8 E.ToI. & Kordick, Contractor P2-ll-l Fletcher Jones Chevrolet, Hydraulic Crane & Truck Healy Tibbitts Construction Co., Contractor I-7-3 Jo Putnam Henck, Contractor P2-17 J.E. Hoagland & W.W. Hoagland, Contractor P2-19 Howard Supply Company, Steam Cleaner · City of Huntington Beach, Crossing Guard I-8 Kordick & Rados, Contractor I-8 B.H. Miller Construction Co., Contr. J-7-2/J-12 Nuclear-Chicago, Test Equipment Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Pipe Testing I-8 Twining Laboratories, Testing I-8 F.T. Ziebarth Company, Inc., Contractor Pl-3-1, Pl-1R-l/P2-1R-l TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF A-3 $ $ AMOUNT 610.00 71002 Jrr,r::: C:7 -re.._.) • u .l l,695o5CS 366098 862.66 135019 61.75 llo03 158076 50.22 13.60 4.98 17023 16.20 1,047.38 16.87 115.31 273.79 659.93 38000 217.21 213.00 178.40· 64.05 77.28 201.76 78.66 1,302.79 137.88 183.01 75,810.61 1,992.00 6,250.00 41,206.33 l~ll. 40 77,364.00 10,023.20 15,387.62 23,290.80 22,868.80 1,392.50 183.15 52L~, 927. 34 67,270.43 631.69 2,018.75 13.90 7,313.00 80?,544.91 878,355.52 DISTRICT NO. 2 WARRANT NO. ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 18 7 ~ 18038 18039 18040 . Freedom Newspapers, Inc., EIS Hearing Notice 2-14-1 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Merco Construction Engineers, Inc., Contractor 3-16 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN J:i,AVOR OF City of Newport Beach, Connection Collection Fee DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND WARR.l\NTS IN FAVOR OF Sh~irman-Simpson, Engineering 5-19 -I?- AMOUNT $ 137.92 $ 46,889.49 560.00 WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 18043 18044 18045 18046 18047 18048 18049 18050 18051 18052 18053 18054 ~oyle Engineering, Engineering Service AoDo #9 Orange City N~ws, Bid Notice A.Do #9 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND ·wARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Design Services 7-5-lR CONSTRUCTION FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Ao T. & S. F. Railway Co., Crossing Insp. 7-6-4 Boyle Engineering, 'Survey 7-6-3 & 7-6-4 Colich Cons true t1on Co.'· Contractor 7-6-3 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 7-6-3 & 7-6-4 Northern Contracting Co., Contractor 7-6-4 Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Pipe Testing 7-6-3 DISTRICTS NOS. 1 & 7 SUSPENSE FUND vlARRANTS IN FAVOR OF County of Orange, Compaction Testing 7-6-2 Mike Masanovich Construction Co., Inc., Contr. 1-12 Ernest E. Pestana, Inc., Contractor 7-6-2 Southern California Edison Co., Grant of Easement 7-6-1 Sully Miller Contracting Co., Contractor 7-6-1 -C- $ $ AMOUNT 4,019.54 94.43 4,113.97 7,399.50 $ 451.58 1,635.50 189,084.69 426.30 80,392.82 1,375.00 $ 273,365.89 $ 284,879.36 $ 51.25 25,907.40 94,353.50 1,224.oo 1,960.00 $ 123,496.15 HESOLUTION NO. 72-71 APPROVING 'PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR INFLUEET i•IE'rERING & DIVEB_E.ION srrRUCTUPE AT RECLAifiATION PLAN1l1 NO. 1 A RESOLUTION OF TF.i.E BOAPJJS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS nos 0 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND ·SPECIFICATIONS FOR I:'WLUENT METERING & DIVERSION STRUCTURE AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NOo I-8-3 * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Noso 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND OIIDER: Section l~ That the detailed plans, specifications and contract docwnents,this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by John Carollo Engineers for construction of Influent Metering & Diversion Structure at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. I-8-3, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2o That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of Ca~ifornia; and, Section 3. Th.at the General Manager be authorized to establish bid date, conditioned on assurance of receipt of a. combined state and federal grant offer, at which time they will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors; and, Section 5. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized to award contra.ct for said work on behalf of these Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1972. Agenda Item #17\a) -D-All Districts RESOLUTION KO. 72-72 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL SECONDARY TREATMENT AT RECLAMATION PLANT ITO. 1 AND WATER REUSE FACILITIES AT PLAUT NO. 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL SECONDARY TREATMENT AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. Pl-9-1, AND WATER REUSE FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. ·2, JOB NO. J-4-1 * * ~ * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by John Carollo Engineers for construction of Additional Secondary Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-9-1, and Water Reuse Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-4-1, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety.Code of the State of California; ~d, Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish bid date, conditioned on assurance of receipt of a combined state and fe~eral grant offer, at which time they will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards· and the Districts' Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors; and, Section 5. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized to award contract for said work on behalf of these Boards of Directors.· PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held Ms.y 10, 1972. Agenda Item #17(b) -E-All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 72-73 APrnovrr-:G PLAlYS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR DIGESTEHS H & 0 AT PLANT no. 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOAHDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTHICTS NOS o 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFOR!:UA, APPROVING PL..£\.NS AHD SPECIFICATIONS FOR DIGESTERS N & 0 AT PLANT NO~ 2, JOB NO. P2-21 * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation DistriGts Naso 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by John Carollo Engineers for construction of Digesters N & 0 at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-21, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2" That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; &~d, Section 3. That the Genera1·~1anager be authorized to establish bid date, conditioned on assurance of receipt of a combined state and federal grant offer, at which time they will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the.Boards of Directors; and, Section 5. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized to award contra.ct for said work on behalf of these Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED a.ta regular meeting held May 10,.1972. Agenda Item #17(c) -F-All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 72-74 APPTIO"VII'TG PLATTS Arm SPECIFICATIONS FOR SHOPS AND WAREHOUSE FACILITIES A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITA'l'ION DISTRICTS NOS o 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORAHGE COUW.rY, CALIFORIJIA, APPROVING PLANS AND· SPECIFICATIONS FOR SHOPS AND WAREHOUSE FACILITIES, JOB NO. J-13 * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Noso 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO IIBREBY RESOLVE, DETEru·1Il\TE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract docQ~ents,this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by John Carollo Engineers for construction of Shops and Warehouse Facilities, Job No. J-13, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2v That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions . of the Health and Safety Code of the Si:!ate of Ca~ifornia; and, Section 3. That the General .t-.'lanager be authorized to establish bid date, conditioned on assurance of receipt of a combined state and federal grant offer, at which time they will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' .. Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors; and, Section 5. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized to award contract for said work on behalf of these Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1972. Agenda Item #17(d) -G-All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 72-75 ACCEPTING JOB NO. I-7-3 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF.DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,_ACCEPTING JOB NO. I~7-3 AS COMPLETE ****-X-*** The Bqards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Healy Tibbitts Construction Company, has compl'eted the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for the Pump Station and Additions to Bypass Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. I-7-3, on April 14, 1972; and, Section 2. 'That by letter, John Carollo Engineers, District! s engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said engineers' recommendation, which said recommenda- tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the Pµmp Station and Additions to Bypass Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. I-7-3, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of th~ contract therefor, dated the 14th day of July, 1971; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1972. Agenda Item #17(e) -H-. All Districts cou;ny SA:aTATio:~ DISTRICTS or: OR:\~:GE cou~;ry P. O. Box 3127 -108~4 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CJV\NGE ORDER c.o. ~o. ,, co;~TRACT011: ~~-----~~--~~~-DATE qa'.' 10 1072 l~euodcl Scdincntation l~a.sins 3 f, 4 at Plant ~:o. 1, Job ;~o. Pl-li~-1 J 0 ~: ___ R_e_:~_o_d_c_l __ s_·c_(_i1_·r_~L_~1~1t_~_1_t_i_0~n· __ J~~~s~i~n~s---...\~·--J~)_(~1_(~=----~~t--P~l~~~i1~t---:.~·o~,"--=2~,--.,;'~ro~1~,)~:;~o~,--=-P~~--~l~!{~-~l--~--- ~ Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (:Ut.l:tUc.1::X $ 377 o~ In· accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorizc<l and as conpensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are here by approved. . .. REFERENCE: District's Letter dated r.1arc1l 30, 1972 Contractor's Letter dated :iarch 24, 1972 ADD Sandblast and epoxy plaster eroded weir watls at Sedimentation Basin :~o. 4 For de lays due to. co~apl ianc e \d th operational requirenents the Contractor is l1ercby granted an extension of Contract time of 35 calendar days. ADD TOTAL ADD 377.00 $ 3 7 7, O'O TOTAL TDIE E;(TENSIO~~ 35 calen<lar davs SLJI.L-.{.\RY: · Original Coatract Date Original Contract Time Original Conpletion Date T irae Ext ens ion C. 0. ffl Time Extension this C.O. Revise<l Contract Tine n.evise<l Coltlpletion Date February 13, "1971 390 calendar <lays ?larch 9, 1972 20 calendar.days 35 calendar days 445 calendar <lays ~ta y 3, 19 7 Z · Original Contract Price $ 249,700.00 ~ Board authorization date: :.fa)" 10 ' 19 7 2 Jam~ CAROLLO E:~G I ?·JEERS By -Agenda Item #17(f) Prev •. Au th. Changes $ 6,545.50 This Change (ADD)~DEDHCIJ $ 377.00 Amended -I- Contract Price s 256,622.5() Approved: COUXTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California F. T. Z I Ei>.\ffflI. Cff".IPA?.JY All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 72-76 ACCEPTING JOB NO. Pl-lR-1 & P2-1R-l AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. Pl-lR-1 & P2-1R-l AS COMPLETE * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:. Section 1. That the contractor, F. T. Ziebarth Company, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract to Remodel Sedimentation Basins 3 & 4 at Plant No . .. l, Job No. Pl-lR-1 and Remodel Sedimentation Basins A, B & C at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-1R-l, on May 3, 1972; and, Section 2. That by letter, John Carollo Engineers, District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said engineers' recommendation, ~hich said recommenda- tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That Remodeling of Sedimentation Basins 3 & 4 at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-lR-1 and Remodeling of Sedimentation Basins A, B & c at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-1R-l, is hereby accepted as completed :in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated th~ 13th day of February, 1971; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1972. ~~enda Item #17(g) -J-All Districts ADDENDUM NO. 1 to Specifications and Plans for POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT at PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-20 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRJCTS · OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Page GP-1, Section l; NOTICE. INVITING BIDS, FEDERALLY ASSISTED PROJECT. Change the first paragraph to reacl as follows: "Sealed proposals will be received at the office of the Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1 at 10844 Ellis Avenue (mailing address: P. 0. Box 8127), Fountain Valley, California, 92708, on or before the 15th day of June ·, 1972, at 11:00 _a. n1. , at which tin1.e they will be publicly opened and read in the office of the Board of Directors at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California, for: POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-20 tr Bo DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS 1. Page 34-5, Section 34-11; SLUDGE AND HOT WATER TEM- PERATURE CONTROLLER.S. . Add the following sentence to the thir~ paragraph of subsection (2): . 11.Tubing will be an average 15 feet and a maxi1num of 25 feet in length for each unit. 11 Agenda Item #17(h) K-1 All Districts ADDENDUM NO. 1 -. Job No. P2-20 Page 2 of 2 C. PLANS 1. Drawing No. E-4 Circuit No. AB407 is shown to be a new circuit. Change ~o show as an existing circuit. All main circuit tie b~eakers are air break draw out type. Acenda Item #17(h) K-2 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS Howard M. Way CE 15636 All Districts C 0 U: ~ ~· Y S :\: H T . .\Ti C: ; D I ST ; . I Ci. S l) r: 0 .' . .', ~ : ~: E C C 1J : : TY P. O. Box 3127 -100-+·i ::llis :\venue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CllA~~GE O:UJI:R c.o. ~o. .) co:~TRACTOR: B. II. .: ~ILLEJ: co::~;Tl:t;CT In~; ClLP,"L;y DATE ~: :-~-\·_l_(_) _l_'_J_7_~----- A<lri~inistra t ion-Lai~L1ccr in~~ Juildin~~ .·\li1.titiun, .Job :~o. J-7-2 li JOB: Vel1iclc :~~intcnancc Facilities, Job :;6. J-12 Amount of th i's Change Order (ADD) ('D.1:DlJC!K)C $ 7 ,8~1. 36 In accord an cc \d th contra c t prov is ions , th c f o 11 owing ch an g es in the . contract and/or contract h·ork arc hereby authorized and as compensation th c r cf or , the f o 11ow1 n g a <l d it ions to or d ·c <l u c-t ions ·fro rn th c contract pr i cc are here by approved. . .. REFERENCES: Districts ' corr cs T) on den c e d ~ t e <l : ~ o v : 13 , 1 9 71 , t l~ b l'"" 197., ·i. " lll7"J \' 8 107'7 e • ~, ... , .• ar. v, ~P ~, .13.r. , .,. ... , Apr. 10, 1972, Apr. 17, 1972, Apr. 27, 1972 (2), ;\pr. 28, 1972 Contractor ' s c or r c s 1) on d c n c e <lat c cl : Jan • 2 3 , 1 9 7 2 , aa r. 2' 10 7 2 , j !a r. 3, l 9 7 2' .. ia r . 7 , l 9 7 2 ' : la r. 2 9' - 1972, Apr. 7, 1972, Apr. 21, 1972 (2) Contractor's Change Order Esti1'.1ates: :'fos. 9, 10 fi 11 J-7-2 -Apr. 20, 1972 St re ec h E 1 cc tr i c Co . . In vo i cc : :Jo . A 2 3 6 613 -~.Ia r • 31 , 1 9 7 2 Drawings:· Sheet E-1, Rev. 2 of J-2 ~'licrotron :'lovable Partition Shop Drai.dngs ADD Install on Force Account 3,000 lineal feet of 500 I·iG! cable in con<lui t to proviJe new power supply to laboratory 1uuilding at Plant :fo. 1 .Movable partitions at A<lrninistration,- En(T ineer incr Bui ldin·:r 0 0 0 Door at Room 202 Widen door at storage Rework fascia Change Doors Nos. 4, 5 and 19 from pain~ grade to walnut Agenda Item #17(i) L-1 Add $6,535.71 .\dd 642.35 Add 256.45 Add 32.20 Add 143.75 Add 230.40 TOTAL ADD $7,891.36 All Districts \.. \..' L;. ~ 1 l .::>; \.. ' 1 L \ l 1 L'.' lJ l 0 l ; , 1 L ! .J U ! · U .:-~ L .. ; L ~ ~ .. n.J" L l P.O. Box 3127 -100-+4 Ellis ,\venue Fountain Valley, California 92708 ClIA~~GE OlWER C • O • ~..: O • 3 ( c on t i :1 :.1 e d ) DATE ~-~-~-;· __ l_P-,--,-r~-~-~--~~~ ...\(.bJinistratio11-En~~inccri11g BuilJin~~ :\c..i<lition, Job ::o .. J-7-~ JOB: ________ ~a~n~ci--!.V~c~h~i~c~l~c~.~;~~11~·r~1t~c~~il~~:1~c~c~i=~~~c~i~l~iut~i~c~'r~)~•~·~Tol.L.o.!.1 1__...·;~o---~.I~-~1-~ ______ ~----~~--~-- EXTP.:sro:'l OF co:ffll\CC TI! IE In or<ler to acconplish the above chanc;cs the Contractor is hereby granteJ an extension of contract time of 30 calendar days. SLJI'I:.1r\RY or-co:~r;~~\CT TI: m: Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date . Time Ex tens ion C. 0. If 2 Ti1'!1e Ex tens ion T:li s Change Or<ler Total Ex tens ion of Contract Tii.lC Revis c <l Contract T iriw Revised Corapletion Date TOTAL TDIE EXTE?~SION 30 cztl~n<lar days J-7-2 October 15, 1971 210 calcnJar <lays ~·Iay 12, 1972 03· calenJar days 30 calcntlar d~ys . 93 calendar days 313 calendar days August 13, 1972 J-12 October 15, 1971 120 calen(iar days February 12, 1972 63 calendar Jays 30 calendar days 93 calen<lar.days 213 calendar <lays ~ Ia y 1 S , 19 7 2 Original Contract Price $ 477,500.00 Bo'T'rd authorization date: ;.1 a y 1 O , 1 9 7 2 • \'IILLLU·I P. FICKER AIA By Agenda Item #17(i) Prev. Au th • . Chancres b $ 3,732.11 This Change (ADD) fRP.mu;.:rJ $ 7,391.36 Amended L-2 Contract Price s .. i89,173.47 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By ____ ~~--~--~--~~----------~-C }u e f Engince . . 13. H. :aLLER c.m~STRUCTI.O:~ Cm!PA:~y All Districts M E M 0 R A N D U M COUNTY SANITATION DiSTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 May 1, 1972 TO: Paul G. Brown FROM: Robert A. Webber SUBJECT: Reclaimed Water Charges, Other Agencies As per your request the following information on reclaimed water has been gathered from the individual agencies. Although the information was supplied by the agencies concerned, only approximate volumes and charges were quoted, however, the data appears to be accurate. Moulton Niguel Water District Currently, Moulton Niguel Water District is supplying approximately 0.200 mgd (during winter months) and 1.250 mgd (during summer months) to Mission Viejo Golf Course. Current agreement is as such: $1.00 per acre foot ($3.07 per million gallons) for the first 350 acre feet (114.100 million gallons). Use above this amount charged at regular irrigation water rate of $59 per acre foot ($181 per million gallons). Average T.D.S. concen- trations in reclaimed water 900 to 1100 mg/l, average approximately 1000 mg/l. . District currently under negotiation with El Niguel Golf Course and anticipates supplying same with similar amounts of water. District · was required to construct chlorination facilities and an additional pump station in the amount of $110,000. Retail price to El Niguel Golf Course is expected to be somewhat higher than that char~ed to Mission Viejo Golf Course due to th~s necessary capital expenditure. As the treatment plant that will be supplying El Niguel Golf Course has a greater number of home regenerative water softeners, T.D.S. concentrations will be slightly higher to El Niguel Golf Course. Los Alisos Water District District currently supplying approximately 0.500 mgd of reclaimed water to Irvine Company, with no charges aoplied for this w~ter. The District has recently spent approximately $65,000 for an additional force main and pump station to supply this water. D~strict feels that having a location to dispose of effluent is compensation enough. Aver- age T.D.S. concentration is 1050 mg/l. Agenda Item #19 M-1 All Districts Memorandum ~· To: _ From: Paul G. Brown . Robert A. Webber May 1, 1972 Subject: Reclaimed Water Charges, Other Agencies Irvine Ranch Water District. District has been supplying considerable.amount of reclaimed water to the Irvine Company for the past.few years. Due to reciprocal in-house agreements, no charges have been levied on the Irvine Company. District currently has three potential prospects for reclaimed water with cu~rent selling price anticipated at $39.60 per acre foot ($121.57 per million gallons). Average T.D.S. concentration is 1000 to 1100 mg/l. Los Virgines Hater District Unconfirmed information states that Los Virgines Water District is supplying reclaimed water at $15 per acre foot ($46.05 per million gallons). T.D.S. concentratlons unknown. City of San Clemente During summer months, the City treatment plant delivers approximately 0.500 mgd of reclaimed water to the city-owned golf course. Although no particular charge is l~vied, I am sure there is an accounting transfer somewhere within the City financial structureo The City relates that should someone seek to purchase the reclaimed water the cost would be 1/2 that of domestic water. T.D.S. concentration, 900 to 1100 mg/l. Rossmoor Sanitation Com0any The Company in the past has delivered as much as 0.500 mgd of reclaimed water to Lion Country Safari. Although a cost for water delivered to Lion Country Safari was discussed, unofficial sources relate that the agreement was never consummated. The majority of the reclaimed water is supplied for golf course irri- gation at Rossmoor and any excess water available is given to Lion Country Safari. Approximate T.D.S. concentrations at 1050 mg/1. County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County Whittier Narrows -The Districts currently supply approximately 15 mgd to the Central and West Basin Water Replenishment District for ground water recharge. Reclaimed water is blended with Colorado River water and spread along the Rio Hondo and San Gabriel River. Selling price at approximately $22 per·acre foot ($67.50 per million gallons). T.D.S. concentration is 600 mg/l. -2- M-2 All Districts '--1 Memorandum Ma.y 1, 1972 To: Paul G. Brown From: Robert A. Webber Subject: Reclaimed Water Charges, Other Agencies City of Pomona -Districts curr~ntly delivering approximately 2 mgd of reclaimed water to City of Pomona for industrial and agricultural use. Selling price at approximately $7 per acre foot ($21.50 per mill±on gallons). T.D.S. concentration is 600 mg/l. City of Lon~ Beach -Districts have 6 to 12 mgd reclaimed water from the Long beach Renovation Plant available to the City of Long Beach. There are no charges levied for this water. Approxi- mate T.D.S. concentration is Boo to 1000 mg/1. Agenda Item #19 M-3 All Districts AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into as of the P~--;.~I.SEu DRAFT 3-30-72 day of 1972, by and. between ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRIC.T, hereinafter referred to as "Water District" and COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, of Orange County, for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, hereinafter referred to as "Sanit~tion District". RECITALS: A. Water. District is· a public corporation created and governed by the Orange County Water District Act (Uncodified Act 5683, Stats. 1933 CH 924, as amended). B. Sanitation District is a public corporation organized pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act (Chapter 3, Part 3, Division V of the Health and Safety Code) and is a party to the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement dated March 10, 1971 between its elf and County Sani ta ti on Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6"·, 7, . and 11, and amendments thereto. C. Water District is authorized to acquire, construct, operate and maintain facilities necessary to augment and protect the quantity and quality of the water supplies within its boundaries. D. Sanitation District is authorized to construct, maintain, ·and operate such works as may be necessary to conserve and put to beneficial use any water or sewage effluent recovered from the opera- tion of their sewage plant or works by discharging the water or sewage effluent in such a manner as to percolate into the underground gravel and replenish the natural water resources. E. Sanitation District has heretofore adopted Resolution No. 971 encouraging the reclamation of waste water originating in Orange County and providing for delivery of said waste water for said purpose. Agenda Item #19 N-1 All Districts F. Water District has determined that it is feasible to recla:im said waste water, if the reclaimed w~ter is mixed with desalted sea or brackish water, for use in its Coastal Project which is ·necessary to augment and conserve the water supplies within Water District. Water District intends to construct a waste water reclamation plant (hereinafter referred to as "reclamation plant") and a desalting plant on its property located at Ward Street and Ellis.Avenue in the City·of Fountain Valley, adjacent to Treatment Plant No. 1 of Sanitation District for said purpose. G. Each of the parties hereto are authorized to contract with ~ach other to carry out their respective powers,. authority, and purposes. H. It is to the best interests of Water District and Sani- tation District to enter into an agreement to utilize the waste water from within the respective Districts in Orange County for reclamation and use in the Coastal Project of Water District and to provide for disposal of the waste brine discharge from Water District's desalting plant. AGREEMENTS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, covenants and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: 1. Delivery of Waste Water Sanitation District shall deliver to Water District on a continuous ~asis, except for Acts of God or other emergencies, for use in its reclamation plant and Water District shall accept delivery of waste water at no charge from Sanitation Districts' Treatment Plant No. 1 at a rate of 15 million gallons per day from the effective date hereof to July 1, 19769 Subsequent to July 1, 1976 Water District shall pay to Sanitatlon District a charge per million gallons equal to the economic value, if any, of secondary treated waste water as determined by the average delivered value of equivalent waste water processed by all other facilities within the Santa Ana Agenda Item f/19 N-2 All Districts River Regional Quality Control Board jurisdiction. Said charge shall be adjusted annually on July 1 on the basis of the ratio of the deter- mined value as of July 1, 1976 and the average value for each sub- sequent year. 2. Quality of Waste Water The waste water delivered pursuant hereto shall be waste water which has received secondary: treatment by means of high rate biological filtration or equivalent treatment. 3. Discharge of Desalting Plant Sanitation District will receive into i~s disposal facilities ~he waste brine discharged by Water District from its desalting plant at a rate not to exceed 15 million gallons per day or the simul.taneous rate waste water is received by Water District from Sanitation District, .. provided however, that if Wa~er District finds it necessary to exceed said simultaneous rate it shall pay to Sanitation· District, during the period from the effective date hereof to July 1, 1976, an amount equal to $30.00 per million gallons per day for such excess discharge for each day said simultaneous rate is exceeded. Subsequent to July 1, 1976, said charge shall be adjusted annually on the basis of the ratio the then current Engineering News Record Index for Los Angeles bears to the April, 1971 Index of 1550. After 1990, the amount of waste brine discharged shall at no time exceed fifty percent (50%) of waste water delivered to Water District by Sanitation District. 4. Discharge of Reclamation Plant Waste by Water District Sanitation District does hereby grant to' Water District the right to discharge its normal sewage and incidental waste as well as the waste from operation of the reclamation plant into the trans- mission or disposal facilities of Sanitation District in a manner and· in locations approved by Sanitation Distrj~ct. Said discharge to transmission facj_lities of Sanitation District shall not exceed a peak flow of 100,000 gallons per day~ For the discharge of said sewage and waste, Water District shall pay to Sanitation District the ·actual A5enda Item //-19 N-3 All Districts treatment costs of Sanitation District for the fiscal year in which said discharge takes place. In the ~vent said discharge exceeds a peak flow of 100,000 gallons per day, Water District shall.pay to ~· Sanitation District a charge computed at $75.00 per million gallons discharged. Subsequent to July 1, 1976, said charge shall be adjusted annually on the basis of the ratio the then current Engineering News Record Index for Los Angeles bears to. the April., 1971 Index of 1550. Said charges will be. invoiced and paid annually not later than October 1 following the end of the preceding fiscal year. The points of discharge from the plans_and specifications for ~he discharge connection facilities shall be approved by Sanitation District. 5. Charge for Excess Suspended Solids In the event the discharge from operation of the reclamation plant into the facilities of Sanitation District contains a total amount of suspended solids in any one day in excess of the a.mount of suspended solids contained in the waste water delivered during the same day by Sanitation District, Water District shall be subject to an excess solids charge computed at $17.00 per ton (dry basis) of such excess suspended solids. Said charge will be applicable to July 1, 1976, and will be invoiced and paid annually not later than October 1 following the end of the preceding fiscal year. Subsequent to July 1, 1976, said charge will be adjusted annually on the basis of the ratio of the then current Engineering News Record Index for Los Angeles to an Index of 1300. Said charge may also be adjusted after commencement of said dis.charge by Sanitation District in the event the cost of removal and treatment of suspended solids is determined to be materially increased by changes required by regulatory agencies having juris- diction, or otherwise. 6. Quality of ;·re.stes Discharged The quality of discharge from desalting plant and reclamation plant shall conform to current applicable quality standards and regu- lations of Sanitation District, provided however, that the temperature Ao-enda Item #19 Q N-L~ All Districts of the discharge to disposal facilities of Sanitation District shall not exceed 85 degrees Fahrenheit or such temperature as may be mandated by regulatory agencies having jurlsdiction, and that the total sus- pended solids content for any one day ln said discharge does not exceed the total suspended solids content in the waste water delivered to Water District during the same day. 7. Water Quality l'·~oni torin~ Water District shall establish ·and maintain a ·water quality monitoring progr&"Tl for the waste ·water delivered from Sanitation District and for waste waters discharged by ~'later District to Sani- ~ation District facilities,. Said monitoring program shall be approved by Sanitation District, subject to changes from time to time caused by changes in operation of Water District desalting and reclamation operations or by changes in requirements imposed on Sanitation District by any regulatory agencies having jurisdiction. Written reports of the r~sults of said monitoring program shall be submitted by Water District monthly to Sanitation District, not later than 15 days after the end of each month. 8. Corrunencement of Delivery and DischGi;rge The delivery of waste water and discharge of waste brine and other wastes provided herein shall commence as of the completion of the construction and commencement of operation of the waste water reclamation plant and the desalting plant by Water District. 9. Facilities Facilities for delivery of the waste water by Sanitation District to. Water District and the waste discharge lines shall be constructed and operated by Water District at Water District's cost and expense pursuant to plans and specifications approved in writing by Sanitation District.· A recording and totalizing meter shall be installed and properly maintained upon the :iaste· delivery facilities) waste brine delivery facilities and each of the waste water facilities from the reclaTUation plant which is capable of mea~uring the flo· .. r therein, at Water Di~~trict 's cost and expense in accord·ance with i'·~-5 Al 1 D j_ G t l' j c t ;~ plans, specifications and maintenance procedures approved in writing by Sanitation District. 10. Right of Way for Facilities Sanitation Distr~ct shall license Water District to construct pipelines and one injection well site on property owned by Sanitation District necessary for the construction, operation and maintenance of the waste water delivery, .waste discharge and waste .brine discharge, injection well facilities, including the use of temporary areas for the construction of said facilities, without cost to Water District. The location, design, and specifications, of such licensed facilities ~hall be approved by Sanitation District. The expense of any future relocation of said facilities, if required by Sanitation District, shall be borne by Water District. 11. Modification Needed to Ueet Discharge Standards In the event it becomes necessary to modify.any facilities or treatment processes of Sanitation District to meet the discharge standards set by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, or agency having jurisdiction of such discharge from time to time, Water District will pay to Sanitation District that portion of the cost of such modification, which is attributable to Water District's opexations under this agreement. If modification of Water District's facilities is necessary to meet such standards, Water District shall make such modifications and pay the cost thereof. 12. Modification of Treatment Facilities In the event it is desirable to improve the quality of the waste water deliv~red by Sanitation District in order for Water District to reclaim it and the parties hereto agree, Sanitation District will modify its treatment and appurtenant facilities or processes. Water District will pay to Sanitation District the actual costs incurred for said modification. 13. Term The term of this agreement shall be 30 years from the date hereof. Agenda Item #19 N-6 All Districts : f 14. Hold Harmless and Indemnitz Water District shall, and does hereby, agree to indemnify Sanitation District against and to hold Sanitation District harmless from any and all damages, claims of damages or liabilities of whatso- ever nature arising out of the, or in connection with, Water District's operations hereunder, including the use of the licenses which may be granted as provided herein. . Sanitation District shall, and does .hereby, .agree to indemnify Water District against and to hold Water District harmless from any and all damages, claims of damages or liabilities of whatsoever ~ture arising out of, or in connection with, Sanitation District's operation of its sewage treatment plants and sewage transmission and outfall facilities. Water District shall require of each of its contractors, with whom contracts are made for the construction, operation, maintenance or repair of facilities to be constructed for the delivery of waste water and discharge of waste brine and other wastes as provided for herein, to agree to indemnify and hold harmless Sanitation District from any damages or claims for damages, including costs and attorney's fees incurred in defending any such claims, which may arise out of such contracts· or contractor's activities. Water District shall further require each of said contractors to provide workmen's compensation insurance and comprehensive and contractor's liability. insurance with limits of not less than $500,000 for injury or death of one person and $1,000,000 for any one occurence and not less than $500,000 pr.operty damageo Said contractor shall be further required to cause Sanitation District to be named as an additional insured in the comprehensive and contractor's liability insurance and to furnish a certificate of waiver of subrogation under the terms of the work- men's compensation insurance. Agenda Item //-19 N-'"( ·All Distrjcts . ' ' IN WITHESS 1·IBEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the day and year first above written. Approved as to form: RUTAN & TUCKER By _____ G_e_n_e_r_a~l,__C~o-un __ s_e_l ______ __ Approved as to form: MILLER, NISSON & KOGLER By ----~G-e_n_e_r_a~l~C~o-un __ s_e~li:-------- Agenda Item #19 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT By _______________________________ __ President By __ __,,S_e_c_r_e~t-a_r_y __________________ __ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, of Orange County By __ ~~-:--------==----=------~=----~~ Chairman, Board of Directors By ------~------~-----~----,-~----Secretary, Board of Directors N-8 All Districts ~T>L1lala._· richard terry Ll AND ASSOCIATES 116 Horth Carousel St. Anaheim, Calif. 92806 18 April 1972 Fred A. Harper General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. o. Box 8127 Fountain valley, California 92708 environm.ental science & services Tel. ( 714) 630-2930 Subject: Proposal to Prepare Environmental ~mpact Statements for the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Richard Terry & Associates/Environmental Science & Services (RT&A/ES&S) is pleased to· submit a proposal to prepare two Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) for the Districts. The following is submitted for your consideration. Part I --Statement of Work A. Scope of Work Prepare two EISs for proposed improvements on the Districts• treatment facilities. One Impact state- ment will cover only the proposed activated-sludge facilities; the other will involve several projects, including booster station and sludge handling f acil- i ties. B. Format of Impact Statements The EISs shall be prepared in accordance with the state and Federal Environmental Impact Statement guidelines that are currently available, or in a modified approved format. c. Briefinqs and Liaison 1) For the purposes of preparation of the EISs the Consultant shall be thoroughly briefed about the pro- posed projects by County Sanitation Districts person- nel, and all relevant facts shall ~e divulged. 2) A Project Engineer from the Districts shall be assigned, to act as liaison, to resolve any problem areas, and with John Carollo Engineers. 3) The Consultant shall interface with the Districts• design engineers, John Carollo Engineers, cognizant agencies, such as the Regional Water Quality Control Board, other State and local officials and agencies, as required, as part of the effort in preparing the EISs. Agenda Item #20 0-1 All Districts . ' - 2 - 4) Progress reports or progress meetings will be held periodically, if requested ~y the Districts. D. Relevant Reoorts and Documents 1) In addition to the oral briefings ·presented by the Districts and John Carollo Engineers, all rel- evant docu~ents and reports shall be made available to the Consultant. 2) All reports, drawings and documents provided to the Consultant as part of this contract shall be re- turned to the CSDOC or John Carollo Engineers at the completion of the contract. E. Deliverables .1) ·A preliminary (rough) draft EIS for the activated- sludge facilities shall be submitted to the Districts fcir review purposes by 1 July 1972, or earlier. The second draft EIS shall be submitted for review by 1 August, or earlier. Comments provided by reviewers shall f orrn the basis for the preparation of the Final Impact Statement. All problem areas shall be resolved, insofar as practicable, before typing the Final Impact Statement. The Fin2.l I~pact St:-atement shall b8 an approved Rough Draft report. 2) A total of 50 copies· of each EIS shall be submitted to the Districts. The Final EIS for the activated- sludge facilities shall be submitted by 1 August, or earlier, and the second EIS shall be submitted by 1 September,·or earlier. 3) Prior to printing the Final EIS a copy of the Final EIS shall be submitted to the Districts for final approval. If the Districts require no more than a week for review, the deadline will be met. No major revisions are ant~cipated during this final approval/ review process. 4) The Districts shall make. available to the Consultant reproducables of any drawings, maps, or other material to be used in the Final Impact Statements.' Part II --Terms and Conditions A. Richard Terry & Associates/Environmental Science & Services acts as an independent contractor rendering professional services. R'r&J°\/ES&S, or its agents, will not hold the Districts or the county of orange liable for any injuries incurred as· a result.of providing professional service~ under the terms of this contract. Agenda Item #20 0-2 All Districts .L I - 3 - B. work performed shall be based upon the tasks outlined in Part I of this proposal. The Consultant shall make as detailed Environmental Impact study as considered necessary to fullfull the requirements. of the state and Federal governments. c. The consultant shall not be penalized for any significant delays resulting from changes in engineering plans, Environmental statement guidelines, or changes in the State, Federal or local regulations. D. The Consultant shall not be penalized for delays that are beyond his control. E. under the terms of this contract the Consultant shall be reimbursed for any work performed. work on this contract shall be considered complete when the Final EISs have been submitted to the Districts. Any additional work after the EISs have been submitted shall be at the same rate as the basic contract. F. RT&A/ES&S proposes to perform professional services on a per diem basis. The rates are as follows: Dr. R. n. Terry In-town/in-office out-of-town Air Pollution/meteorologist Ecoriomist (Ecolomist) Civil/sanitary Engineer Marine Biologist/Ecologist Technical (Engr.) Assistant secretary Estimated Expenses for Proposed work Preparation of Final EISs Photocopy work collation covers Binding Graphics Reproduction of dwrs., maps etc. Other Misc. Expenses xerography Photography Misc. office expenses $280/day 320/day 320/day 300/day 150/day 150/day .80/day 40/day $200 70 40 30 100 60 $500 $150 20 125 $245 Agenda Item #2v 0-3 All Districts \ \ 4 - Travel 2 trips to John Carollo Eng~neers 1 trip to Sacramento Local travel Total expenses are estimated as $1115.00. $150 70 150 $370 G. The maximum cost to prepare the two Environmental Impact Statements shall not exceed $8,500.00 without further authorization, including expenses. H. The Consultant, RT&A/ES&S, shall bill the District on actual work performed, based upon a per diem basis, includ- ing expenses (and travel). The Consultant shall bill the Districts monthly. I. Work on the environmental reports can be started by RT&A/ ES&S as soon as notified in writing by the Districts. Yours truly, Richard Terry & Associates/ Environmental Scien_c:e & Services <;;: __ . __ -. .) . . ... ··-~"---·'/ .-/ .', . ~ . Ri~1~~r~: . e~~ . Executive irector RDT/f j Agenda. Item .f/2CJ O·-h All Districts SUPERVISOR, FIFTH DISTRICT RONALD \V. CASPERS CHAIRMAN, ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORANGE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING !515 NORTH SYCAMORE. P. 0. BOX 687. SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702 PHONE: 834-3550 <AREA CODE 714> April 18, 1972 Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Gentlemen: . By Resolution No. 72-287, the Orange County Board of Supervisors adopted the in~lementation program for the Santa Ana River-Santiago Creek Green- belt Plan, copy of which was previously sent to you. Your appointee to the greenbelt ad hoc cormnittee, Fred Harper, participated in the preparation of this program. As an important jurisdiction i11 the river cOJ:ridor, your Board is requested to adopt the program, by resolution. Implementation of the Greenbelt Plan will produce an incomparable open space asset for all citizens of Orange County, in this and subsequent generations. Your cooperation is earnestly solicited. Cordially, 1l?J/a-1~ Ronald W. Caspers Chairman Orange County Board of Supervisors RWC/CRS/ld Agenda. Item #21 p All Districts . -, COMMISSION SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA· COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT 1100 GLENDON AVENUE LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90024 • (213) 478-0808 BERT BO~D. PRFSIO(NT May 5, 1972 LINOSl.EY PAPS01'.S, 'dCE P"<E'llOP<T HEl.EN COBB THOMAS C:. l.AUE!ACHER L. E. TIMBERLAKE PROJECT MANAGER GEORGE: E. HLAVKA P11 0. TO: THE JOINT BOARDS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITA~ION DISTRICTS CONSUL TING BOARD PAO,, JOHN 0 IS.AACS. C><••« .. ,.N RICHARD K C LEE. !<A D ERMAN A. PEARSO~~-SC 0 DONALD W. PRITCHAPD Pt< D. .JOHN H. RYTHER. P><.0 FROM: LINDSLEY PARSONS, COl·iMISSIONER, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT ·RE: PROPOSAL BY STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD TO PARTICIPATE IN PROJECT MANAGEr.ffiNT AND FUNDING ·At a special meeting of the SCCWRP Corrunission held on May 3, 1972, the Cornmission m1anirnously adopted a motion instructing the President of the Commission and/or a member of the Commission to meet and discuss with State Water Resources Control Board representatives the proposal of the State Board to participate in the management and funding of the SCCHRPA project, as outlined in the attached letter. Bert Bond, President of the Cormnission, has requested that your representative be a member of the SCGWRPA Committee to take part in the discussions with the State Board in an effort to work out an agreement for participation and fund- ing which could be recommended to the sponsoring agencies. The State Board proposal that a "Project Control Group" be established to direct the activities of the project was not considered to be acceptable by the Commission, since the sponsors, who to date have committed themselves to an in- vestment of $1,700,000 in the furtherance_ of its objectives, would have only one member with a minority voice on the <control group. The other two members would be appointed by the EPA and the State Board. It was conceded, however, that the larger agencies, which may in time take over the entire funding of the project, should be entitled to some voice in the direction of its activities. \ Ap:enda Item #22 Q-1 All Districtn .. ' May 5, 1972 Page 2 It was my suggestion that the Joint Powers Agreement might be amended to p~rmit a larger Commission member- ship, with from two to four additional Commissioners to be appointed by the State Board and the EPA, leaving the majority of the Commission memberships in the hands of · the present sponsoring agencies. This proposal was generally agreed to be a possible solution, however, I would not recommend advancing the suggestion to the State Board officials until preliminary discussions have taken place, and we have arrived at some tentative dollar figures concerning the extent of support offered, and we have ascertained the measure of policy control required by the federal and state agencies. President Bond has requested that each Commissioner should get an up-to-the-minute reading from each of the supporting agencies on its reaction to extensive state and federal funding, and whether or not enlargement of the Commission would be an acceptable compromise to the state's proposal of a rrProject Control Group 11 • It has always been my opinion that the SCCWRPA studies are of -statewide and nationwide significance, and that the major share of the costs should be borne.by the larger government agencies. I am sure that I have had the support of the Orange County Sanitation Districts in my constant efforts to have the Commission and the staff solicit out- side funding. As members of the Executive Committee are aware, I have been ·working on various Washington political contacts to open up avenues for federal participation. I would like to be able to state, on behalf of the Joint Boards, that these districts are in favor of all of the outside flinding ·we can get, and that the negotiating com- mittee for the SCCWRPA Commission be authorized to consider and discuss any reasonable proposals and suggestions for giving the larger government agencies some voice in the policy direction of the studies, including consideration of the possible enlargement of the Commission, as long as majority control of the Commission r~m~ins in the hands of the present sponsoring agencies. Any agreement that might be recommended by the committee and the Commission would still have to have the unanimous approval of the sponsoring agencieso Agenda Item #22 Q-2 All Districts S'JATE OF CAllFOl?NIA-THE P.!':SOIJRCES AGENCY ~TATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD .....,oOM. 1015, RESOURCES BUILDING 1..C16 NINTH STREET • SACRAMENTO 9.58U APR 2 5 1972 Mr. Bert Bond, President Commission Southern California Coastal Water Research Project 333 Hermosa . ·Long Beach, California 90812 Dear Hr .. · Bond: J.10NAlD RE..A.G.A.N, Govc:-,.,:;r The Board has followed with interest the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project since· its inception in 1970. The project has resulted in infor~ation of considerable value to regulatory aGencies and other interests, -particularly as regards the· coI!lpleted technical reports and the data presented by Dr. Hlavka at the Board's public hearing in San Diego on a policy for discharge to ocean waters. Last year in correspondence to your Board of Commissioners, we pointed out the early need for knm·rlede;e of certain oceanographic and biologic conditions as correlated with or affected by wasteHaters of municipal· treatment plnnt origin. r,fo stressed that during 1972 and 1973 the Board must nalce critical decisions in areas of policy and water quality control planning and that appropriate SCCT.IRP activities would provide an information base for Board decisions. The project has undertaken activities that are pertinent to the Board• s needs 2.nd ·we understand that considerable data has been obtained in addition to the rc;)orts and nresentation ~1entioned above .. We also understand fron discussion ·.dth Dr. Hlavka that with uresent .fUndine;, envisioned project priorities may not allow for assernblage, interpretation and evaluation of these data in time for their inclu- sion 1n the final project report for the initial 3-year study period • . We believe the final renort must contain such information because of its importance to both the dischargers and regulatory agencies. We also believe that with the considerable background data now obtained by· the project, efforts should be intensified to isolate the effects of waste discharges on narine beneficial uses, to determine annronriate treat~ent and ciisnosal methods to nrotect beneficial uses~ and to define appropriate techniques for determin- ..._,. ing changes in beneficial uses as caused ~y Haste discharges. Agenda Item #22 Q-3 All Distr1cts Mr. Bert Bond, President -2-·. APR 2 5 1972 Until this time, the Board has participated in the project through a consultant on the Board of Consul tents. It v10uld a11-pear ad.vanta5eous ~o the project and to the Board if "'de· now assume cl a more direct role both in project ffianae:;emcnt and funding. He 1·1ill consider fundin5 assistance to the project during the remainder of 1972 and thereafter for at least 3 years and ·1-:ill recor:-~;iend continuing support by the Envirormental Protection Asency if a Eanacenent arrangement sinilar to the one outlined belo·..r is acceptable to the project sponsors and if the project sponsors continue tne support required to maintain the project staff. We propose that a 11 Projcct Control Group 11 be formed of one representa- tive each from the project sponsors collectively, the Envirollfficntal Protection Accnc:y and the State Board staff. That three~rr.an tea.;;1 \·iould ···direct the project's technical activities, particularly tm·:ards: (1) determining cu."1.d evaluating the extent of Hastc\·:ater trcat~:lent and method of disposal necessary for appropriate \·mter quality management, (2) developinc; appropriate methods for occanoGraphic and biologic s~11pling, analy.sis, ai.J.d interpretation, and (3) en- couraging the pro.jec-c staff to reach definite conclusions as to cause and effect in the October 1972 final report. We sue;gest continuonce of a pro,ject Board of Consultants that would: (1) advise the Project Control Group, (2) assist the project staff follow Project Control Group directives from a technical sense, arid (3) review and critique project reports and other docQ~ents. The project sponsors through their Board of Commissioners \·tould con- tinue project administrative functions including personnel matL.ers. We are optimistic that such joint leadership and fundin~ can result in project activities ai.vid repo::-ts that .. l'lill provide l7~axi1:mm value to the dischargers, Z?A and the State Board. He \·:ould appreciate discussing this proposal with the 3oard of Commissioners and project sponsors and are informing EPA of the proposal by copy of this letter. ~ Sincerely, /1;!-(_ t . .6-vA~ Bill B. Dendy ~ Executive.Officer cc_: Mr. Paul De Falco, Jr. Agenda Item 1¥22 Q-4 All Districts CONBllL Tlf\10 CIVIL ENGINEERS s-s 6080 April 20, 1972 Orange County Sanitation District No. 5 10844 Ellis Avenue P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California Attention: Mr. Ray E. Lewis Gentlemen: In a letter dated October 29, 1971, . Mr. Harper directed that the relocation of the existing gravity sewer in the vicinity of Newport Boulevard be included in Contract No. 5-19 -Sewer Trunk 11 B 11 Unit 8. We did not include the desi9n of this relocation in our proposal of August 3, 1971 for the preparation of plans for Contract No. 5-19. It is therefore proposed that our fee for the engineering design services required be a lump sum of $3,000. The other terms of our pre- vious proposal would also be applicable to this additional work; Please let me know if you have any questions. DCS/lm NEWPORT CENTER OUILDING 359 San Miguel Drive Newport Beach. Cal1tornia 82660 (714) 644-0563 Agenda Item #30 Very truly yours, SHUIHMAN-SIMPSO.N ~dc/.?J;;_~ Donald c.· Simpson -R-Districts 5 & 6 .. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS s-s 6080 April 20, 1972 Orange County Sanitation District No. 5 10844 Ellis Avenue P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California Attention: Mr. Ray E. Lewis Gentlemen: In accordance with your request we are preparing plans for the installation of a liner in the existing v.c.P. sewer on the southerly side of Pacific Coast Highway and westerly of Newport Boulevard. The construc- tion of the liner will be included as a separate bid item with Contract No. 5-19. It is proposed that our fee for the required engineering design services be a lump sum of $1,500. The other terms contained in our proposal dated August 3, 1971 for Contract No. 5-19 would also be applicable to this addi- tional work. Please let me know if you have any questions. DCS/lm NEWPORT CENTER BUILOING 359 Ssn Miguel Drive Newport Beach. Cal1lorrna 92660 (714) 644-0563 Acsenda Item /130 -S- Very truly yours, SHUIRMAN-SIMPSON Donald c. Simpson Districts 5 & 6 ; I COUI\TY SA~H TXf I O:J DI ST iZ I CT ?W. 2 of Orange Courity, C~lifornia ADDE~mu: 1 ~rn. 3 to CONSTRUCTim~ SPECIFIC . .\Tro~·\s AXD PLANS CONT RAC T 1 W • 2 -14 - 1 Nay 3, 19 7 2 I.. PROPOSAL · Bi<l<lcrs a re required to 1 is t the nane s ·of the pipe nanuf ac turer ( s) who will furnish t;1e rcinforccJ coacrete pipe to !)e usc<l in the work. If nor c tlwn one Z:-!~nuf ac turer is to !; e us cd, al 1 nanuf ac- turcr (s) shal 1 be 1 is tccl \·:i th the port ion to be furnished indicatccL The follm·li11~ list shall be attached to the proposal when submitted: PIPE }~~UFACTURER I I. SCiIEl.JULE OF PiUCES SIZE LINEAL FOOTAGL TO BE FTJTF: I S!I[D The bid sche<lule for .Alternates ~:oso 1, 2 anJ 3 shall include the follm:inr; fix cost itcr:s of a<l<litional gravel hitlJing if rcquircJ. Refer to Section 115 of the lJetaileJ Specifications for further details. . . ITE: 1 ?·:0. A. B A~enda Item #38 APPllOX. QUA:JT ITY 0 to 500 cubic ytls 0 to 500 cubic yds Bcdtling ~ravel~ O" to 12" cori1plcte in place for the uni.t price per cubic yard of (<lo not include in Total Contract Price) !3ctldin~ g1~avcl, 12" to 24" comnlctc in nl~cc for the unit price per cuoic yard of (c.lo .aot include in Total Contract Price) T-1 District 2 UNIT PP-ICE $ 7.50 ----- s 9. 00 . ----- l I ADDENDlI'.·1 IW. 1 - . co:nRACT 1:rn. 2-14 -1 Page 2 of 4 ITE:·l !W. c APPllOX. QUA;:T ITY 0 to 500 cubic yds ITPr BcJ<ling 'gravel;· 2'1" to 36" conplcte in place for the unit price per cubic yard of (do not i~clutlc in Total Contract Price) u:nr PRICE I I I. STAm)ARD SPEC I I~ I CAT I o;~s 5/3/72 I Section 22 VIHYL PLASTIC Ln!EH. PLATE Pages 1 through 9 of Section 22 shall be <le.letcd and shall be subs ti tute<l Hi th the follmving: 22-1 GEl~ERAL The Contrac.tor shall furnish and install vinyl plastic liner plate in reinforced concrete pipe and structures as shm\·n on the plans anJ herein specificu. TI1e purpose of the liner pla tc is to e ff cc ti vc ly protcc t the cone retc surf~ces to ,.;hich it is applied fron corrosion, and to accor.iplish this, it is essential t11~t the liner µlate be continuous anu free fron any holes, <lefects or other faults, and that any joint Kelding and seal in~~ t)C equally as ef f cc ti ve as the 1 incr plate. _ The interior area of-reinforced concrete pipe an<l structures shall be scaled anJ protectctl 'dth the specified linin~· as shown on the Plans. 1\ll joints betwcc;i in<li vidual sheets or sections of liner plates s)iall he continuously heat \·:el<lc<l hy the use of welding strips of the same kin<l an<l eciuivalent thickness of natcrial as the liner plates (with the exception of the integral extension ribs.) .. All material and l:ork for ancl in connection ,.;i th t:1c furnis11ing an<l installation of liner plates in rcinforccJ concrete p~pe, manholes anJ structures anJ the field seal.ii1.; an<l 1·:elJin~ o.f joints shall :)c done in strict confon:lity ,.;ith a!'Plicable publishc<l sections of the ST,\:~iJAR~) SPECIFIC,\TIO::s 1-0R PUi>LIC \VORKS CO:~STlWCTIO:~, 197 0 E<li ti on ar1encled as f olloi.,'s :. Section 207-3.4.1 Physical ProDerties, p3.~e 132 Adel to the list of chenical solutions -so<liun hypochloritc at 1%* concentration. Section 207-3.4.3. Details and Dimensions, uage 133 1. Subparagraph (c) -the first para~raph of this subsection sh al 1 be change<l to read as f o llo\1'S: SIIEET MW STl~IP SIZE -Sheets of liner plate shall be as large as practicable to adequately Ac;enda Item #J8 T-~ ·District 2 . ' ADDENDU:.1 1~0. 3 -CONTRACT NO. 2-14-1 Page 3 of 4 5/3/72 fit the intended use. 2. Subparagraph (d) -The fifth sentence of the second paragraph of t!1is subsection shall b·e changed as underlined below: lfoep channels which involve the omission of 3 1/2 inches •••• ·3. The fol lm·1ing subparagraph shall be added to this ·section: (e) STRAP CIL.\;~:JELS m~ EXTRUiJED SIIEETS All sheets havin~ loc~ing extensions extruded t11ereon shall have transverse strap channels cut in the lockinf; ex- tensions so tl1at ti1e strap can l>e place<l into an<l pcrpen<licular to the locking extensions. These channels shall not be less than 1/2-inch ,~·ide and not nore than 3 I 4 -inc l l ',' i cl c and sh a 11 1u e c u t s o t ~lat a max i m m.1 of 1 I G 4 -inch o f the bas c o f th c locking extension is left in the base of the str~p channel. Strap channels shall be placed a r.nnir.mm of 15-inchcs on center to a Ti1axi1au:-.1 of 18-inciies. The strap channels Hill not be. cut through the two locking ex tens ions on each side of the set. There will be no strap channe-ls required in r.10ulded sets. Section 207-3.4.4 Testing Rec1uirer:ients, page 135 All sheets to be use<l in reinforced concrete pipe will be tested at the pipe manufacturers plant as Hell as in the fiel<l. Section 207-3.5.4 l 1:·ecu Channels, 'nage 133 T~e first paragraph shall Le changed' to read as follows: At 8-foot intervals longitu<linally maxinun along liner plate a gap not less than 2-inches or 3 1/2- inchcs in the case of C\:truJccl sheets nor nore than 4-inches ,,·icle shall be left. in all locking exten- sions to provide aQ unobstructeJ transverse weep channel.. .\nv area behind. liner nlate \·,'hic}1 is not . properly scrZreJ· oy re~ular \;eep channels' s~1all have a<l<l it ioaal HCCD char.nc 1 s 2-inches \·:id e pro- vided by cutting aw~y locking cxtens~o11se Provisions shall be rn~clc to pernit ,,;ater bchinJ. the liner of concrete nanhole .shafts to drain into the weep Agenda Item l38 rr'-3 District 2 ADDE~~1JU:.1 t~O. 3 -CONTRACT ~:o. 2 -14 -1 :Page 4 of 4 5/3/72 .. channels of the linc<l structure. If a section of pipe requires uore than one ,,·ec!J channe 1, they sh al 1 be e qui cl i s t an t a par t fr o 1 ~1 t i 1 e c 11 <l s of th c p i p c section. ~/ccp channels \lill be cut into the extruded sheet so tiiat a -113.xinw11 of 1/64-inch of the base locking extension is left on the sheet. Ae;enda Item #38 T-4 District 2 Mr. Fred Harper General l-hnager CALIFORNIA STATE COLLEGE AT FULLERTON 800 NORTH STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD. FuLLERTON. CALIFORNIA 92631 April 24, 1972 Orange County Sanitation District #3 Dear Mr. Harper: In reviewing invoice ff72-1-12~ for the previous year, I find that a sufficient amount of money was not budgeted to cover these costs. We are on a fiscal year budget (July 1 through June JO). We are requesting release from the District Board, or an extension for payment, and also requesting that we be billed July 1, to cover eighteen months use. Then, thereafter, we should be billed on a yearly basis. We would like to also request release from any delinquency charge that may be added due to lack of paynent. Any assistance you may be able to give us in this matter is greatly appreciated. Very truly yours, ~-,·//~- B. E Kempton Chief of ~lant Operation Agenda Item #39 -U-District 2 RESOLUTION NO. 72-80-2 GRANTING CHANGE IN BILLING PERIOD FOR CALIFORNIA STATE COLLEGE AT FULLERTON Arm WAIVING 1971 DELINQUENCY CHAEGE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING AN INITIAL BILLING PERIOD FOR CALIFORNIA STATE COLI.EGE AT FULLERTON, WAIVING DELINQUENCY CHARGE FOR 1971 AND PROVIDING FOR FISCAL YEAR BILLING PERIOD * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, California State College at Fullerton, because of budgetary restrictions has requested that the initial billing period for annual use charges be extended, that.delinquency charges for 1971 calendar year billing period be waived, and that. subsequent billing periods be on a fiscal year basis; and, WHEREAS, Article 11, paragraph (b) of the District's Uniform Connection and Use Ordinance No. 202 provides that the Board of Directors may by resolution consider a special agreement for situations requiring special consideration; and, WHEREAS, California State College at Fullerton, by letter of April 24, 1972, applied to the Board of Directors for special consideration; NOW, THEREFORE·, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED: Section 1. 'J.1hat said letter from California State College at Fullerton, dated April 24, 19'""(2, is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That California State College at Fullerton.Ts initial billing period for annual use fees; as provided for under Ordinance No. 202, is hereby extended from the calendar year 1971· to the period January 1, 1971 through June 30, 1972; and, Section 3. That delinquency charges for the 1971 calendar year billing period for California State College at Fullerton are hereby waived; a11d, Section 4. That commencing with July·l, '1972, the annual billing period for California State College at Fullerton shall be on a fiscal year basis from July through June. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1972. Agenda Item #39_ -V-District 2 HESOLUTION NO. 72-77-3 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR CONSOLIDATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF OPANGE COUNTY, WITH COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO~ 4, OF ORANGE COUNTY, AND AUTHORIZING THE INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS TO EFFECT SUCH CONSOLIDATION WHEREAS, it appear~ that the public interests will be served by the consolidation of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, and County Sanitation District No. 4, of Orange County; and WHEREAS, said consolidation will conform to the Interim Basin Plan of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region; and WHEREAS, an agreement for the consolidation of County Sanitation Districts No. 3 and 4, has been prepared, in which the City of Seal Beach and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Seal Beach have undertaken certain duties and obligations, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 3 be and they are hereby authorized and directed to execute on behalf of County Sanitation District No. 3 that certain "Consolidation Agreement", dated May 10, 1972, by and between County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, County Sanitation District No. 4, of Orange County, the City of Seal Beach, California, a Charter city, and The Redevelop- ment Agency of the City of Seal Beach, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 3 is authorized and directed to perform all necessary acts to initiate and complete said consolidation in order to make July 1, 1974 the effective date of said consoli- dation. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the name of the new consoli.- dated district shall be County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County and said district will be located in Orange County, Califo~nia. Ag~nda Item # 113 W--1 Distr·ict 3 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that preliminary proceedings '-11 be corrunenced under the provisions of Government Code §56261.1. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1972. Agenda Item #43 W-2 District 3 CONSOLIDATION AGREEMENT THIS CONSOLIDATION AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of and and and SANITATION DISTRICT NUMBER FOUR OF ORANGE COUNTY, hereinafter referred to as "District Number Four" SANITATION DISTRICT NUMBER THREE OF ORANGE COUNTY, hereinafter referred to as "District Number Three" THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, a charter city,·hereinafter referred to as "City" THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, hereinafter referred to as "Agency. 11 RECITALS 1. WHEREAS, District Number Four has expressed its willingness to consolidate with District Number Three as expressed in Reso1ution 72-1 (Exhibit A), and 2. WHEREAS, District Number Three has expressed its willingness to consolidate with District Number Four as expressed in its unanimous intent at its meeting of May 10, 1972, (Exhibit B), and 3. WHEREAS, City wishes to insure the development within the City of a sewage system meeting the highest technological standards and also to conform to the adopted Interim Basin Plan of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, and 4. WHEREAS, Agency wishes to improve the quality and capacity of sewage treatment and disposal within the project area of said Agency through the consolidation of District Nurriber Three and District Number Four, and 5. WHEREAS, In accordance with Government Code Section 56000, et seq., Districts Three and Four hereby agree to consolidate as set forth herein. The parties to this consolidation agreement hereby promise and agree as follows: A. The name of the consolidated distri'ct shall be "Sanitation District Number Three of Orange County." B. The sewerage system of District Number Four shall be consolidated with District Number Three at no expense to District Number Three. Agenda Item #L~3 X-1 District 3 CONSOLIDATION AGREEMENT Page Two C. Upon the effective date of this consolidation, all of the assets including but not limited to property taxes receivable from the equalization of Orange County Assessor's Tax Roll and the State Board of Equalization Tax Roll effective March 1, 1974, and all liabilities of District Number Four shall become the assets and liabilities of the consolidated district, and s~id consolidated district shall assume all of the contractual obligations of District Number Four including but not limited to those arising from or incurred bJ virtue of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement between City and District Number Four creating the Seal Beach Administration Building Authority. D. The effective.date of consolidation shall be July 1, 197l+. E. District Number Four represents and agrees that all its sewerage facilities will be transferred and conveyed to the City of Seal Beach prior to the effective date of consolidation. F. That all unencumbered funds, including cash and receivables of District Numbe~ Four shall be transferred to and become the property of District Number Three and shall reduce the consolidation fee as recited herein by. an amount equal to that of said unencumbered funds, cash, and receivables existing as of June 30, 1974. G. That District Number Four shall pay District Number Three all operating costs incurred by District Number Three in treating and disposing of waste water from District Number Four prior to July 1, 1974. H. That District Number Three shall assume all costs of treatment of waste water from District Number Four from and after the effective date of consolidation. I. The City is to terminate the lease of certain city hall facilities by District Number Four reciting an annual rent of $2,500 upon the effective date of consolidation; and to hold District Number Three harmless from any liability resulting from the assumption of the obligations of District Number Four as to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement. J. That the sewage facilities necessary to integrate the systems of District Numbers Three and Four shall be _constructed and pai-d for from funds' of District Number Four and the funds provided in Federal Grant Number C-06-0632 (fonnerly WPC~Cal-632). K. The Agency agrees to pay to the Consolidated District the consolidation fee in the sum of $394,190., payable in five, equal, annual payments of $78,838., beginning July 1, 1974. Agenda Item #43 X-2 District 3 CONSOLIDATION AGREEMENT Page Three L. Dictrict Number Four chall, after the date of this agreement, have the right to discharge its waste water into the sewerage facilities of District Number Three for treatment and disposal by District Number Three and commencing with the date of such discharge by District Number Four, District Number Four shall pay District Number Three an amount equal to six per cent (6%) per annum of the consolidation fee until the effective date of consolidation of July lfi 1974 in addition to the costs provided for in Section "G' above. M. The rights, duties, and obligations of ea.ch of the parties to this agreement are conditioned upon the City of Seal Beach rece1ving Federal Grant Number C-06-0632 (formerly WPC-Cal-632) in an amount sufficient to provide District Number Four with approximately eighty per cent (80%) of the eligible costs as set forth in the application and other grant documents, and are to be ·of no further force or effect in the event such grant is not received. THIS AGREEMENT is executed in four (4) parts; each is hereby declared to be an original; all, however, shall constitute but one and the same agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have affixed their hands and seals with all the formalities required' by law. CITY OF SEAL BEACH Mayor City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH By .._,...~--------------~--------------~ Chainnan Executive Director-Secreta~y Agenda Item #43 X-3 SANITATION DISTRICT NUMBER FOUR OF ORANGE COUNTY By -c~h-a~i-r_m_an--------------------~ General Manager SANITATION DISTRICT NUMBER THREE OF ORANGE COUNTY By ~C-h-a~i-r_m_a_n--------------~----- General Manager District ·3 RESOLUTION NO. 72-78 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASMENT RE CONTRACT }\-0. 7 .,6.-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 & 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY RE CONTRACT NO. 7-6-1 * *·* * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 & 7 of Orange C?unty, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain Grant of Easement dated January 24, 1972 wherein an easement for sanitary sewer purposes is granted to County Sanitation District fio. 7, is hereby accepted from Southern California Edison Company; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said easement is granted in connection with construction of the Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 1, Contract No. 7-6-1; and, Section 4. That authorization for payment in the amount of $1,224 to Southern California Edison Company, Southeastern Division, 1325 South Grand Avenue, Santa. Ana, California, is hereby granted; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 & 7, be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in.the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1972. Agenda Item #47 -Y-Districts 1 & 7 cou;ny SA:HTA TI o~~ lJ I STR I CTS OF O!>...-\:~GE cou::TY P. O. Box 8127 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 c. 0. 1\0~ 7 CONTRACTOR: SULLY<"!TLLEI( CO~JTl~!\CTL:t; co::i>.\:f'Y ------~~~----~---DATE . :av iU 1~17 2 J 0 B • S. ' ' 1 l~ I 0 . ~ J . I) I \ ~ T J • P , 1 .. ) T () 1 . • ' , • \ C . -1 ' 0 .... , 1) " C rl' '' 0 7 6 1 ·--------~-u_ .. _·_J __ ~_. _:_·,_._._. __ :._·,t_J_:_1~-·~~, __ t~_1_:1 __ 1_! __ ~,_l_J_·_··;_1_., __ .,_~ ___ .··~·-----------------~-----~~ Amount of this Change Order (ADD) ~nEmlCIJ $ 1,960.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract anJ/or contract work arc hereby authorized .and as corapensation therefor, the following additions to or dc<luctions from the contract price are hereby approvc<l. .. REFERENCE: Letter fron Boyle Engineering d~ted April 5, 1971 The Contractor was dircctcJ. to start construction at Station 2+7~.19 on this project instead of Station 2+23.19 as dclincatctl on the plans upon which the Contractor sub;.1ittecl his bi<l. The decrease in the pipe len~th was t.o accoii11:10<la tc the Districts' then proposed puuping station (Project :Jo. I-7-3). The Contractor sustaincJ addition a 1 work anJ ext endc<l <lc\·:a tcr i:1g sys tcr.1 prior to notification of station chan~e. ADD TOTAL ADD Original Contract Price $ Prev. Au th. Changes $ This Change (ADD) ~mmuc:rJ $ Amended Contract Price s B2'!rd authorization date: Approved: $1,960.00 $1,960.00 2,2':1'1,481.1'1 6,569.33 1,960.00 ., 1 c)(1 nio .... 0 '--' ... . , . ' I , • .1 .'.) COUXTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By __ ~~~--------~----,.....-.--_...~-..-~~ Clnef Eng1nee~ SULLY ~·HLLE!t co:~TRACTI~~G C0~1P . .\>!Y By Agenda Item //h8 -Z-Districts 1 & 7 cou:\TY S.\::IT:\Tio:: ur:;r;~lCTS OF o::...\::GE cn;~:TY P. O. Box 3127 -106-14 J:llis ,\vc-nue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CJIA~~GE OIWER c ~ 0" l\O .. 8 co:~TRACTO:~: SULLY-:IILLEI~ co::TP.:\CTI~:G CO.'!P.\~;y DATE ~~lc'l )~~ io-:-_-~lq'j.7 7-6-1 Amount of this Change Order (·;XDD0 (DEDUCT) $ __ 7_..,_6_7_6_._o_n __ In accordance with contract provisions, the following .chan~~es in the ·Contract an <l /or con~ r a c t \W r k a r c h c r e by author i z c d and . a s con pc n s a t ion therefor, the following additions to or deductions frora the contr[!.ct price are here by approved. . . ADJUST;JEXT or: E;~GI~·n:ER' s QUA:~TITIIS ADD Item No. 3 6 7 9 DEDUCT ) 13 .. Unit -- L.F. V. I;. V.F. V.F. Change ProI:l 10,098 250 41 31 l,40? 1 "-"" Board authorization <late: May l~, 1972. Agenda Item //:49 Est'<l. Quant. To 10,100 277 46 32 Change 2 27 5 1 56 1 Unit Price S147 $180 $200 $ 90 TOTAL ADD <'.: 1 t) ~ ,... ~·-.,. - $3,000 TOTAL DEDUCT $ 294.00 4,860.00 1,000.00 90.01} $ 6,244 .. 00 $ 1 fl J ~ 2 (,' 1 0 I~ 3,0DO .. ~;o_ .$13 ' 9 2 0 • 0 0 $ 7,676.00 Original Contract Price $ ? .., n " ,, ("I 1 " n ... ' ;.., :J \) ' ...... l) • ~ J ..., Prev. Auth. ChangcsC.O.i.~5 $ . 6 & i Adds 8,529.38 This Change (\:\Till) (uEDUCT) $ 7,676.00 --- Amended Contract Price $2,291,334 .. 38 -AA- Approved: COUNTY SA~\ITAT I O!J DISTRICTS of Orange County, California Districts 1 & 7 --- cou:~TY SA:; I"L.\T I C1 ~: lJ I ST!~ I CT s OF o:~A:: GE ccu: :TY P. O. Box 3127 -100.l~ Ellis Avenue Fouutain \'alley, California 92708 Amount of this Chan_gc Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ ___ ---=o-'"---- In accordanc c ,.;i th contract provisions, the f o 1 lowing changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as cor.1pcnsation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the con tr.act price are hereby approved. rhe Contract.or is hereby granted an extension of: time due to inclerr.en t \·Jea thcr for the follmdng: time periods. October 28 -29, 1971 November 12, 1971 December 3, 1971 December 12 13, 1971 December.22 -31, 1971 ; SUMMARY: -....,. Orie::lnal Ccntract· Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date Board authorization date: May 10, 1972 Aeenda. I tern 1/50 2 calendar· da~vs 1 calendar c12~/s 1 calendar· d:-;.ys · 2 calendar cJ2.ys 10 calendar d2.ys TOT.AL Tir:IE EXTENSION March 10, 197J. j65 calendar cays March 9, 1972 381 calendar days Mar-ch 25, 1972 Original Contract 16 calendar da~!S Price $ 2 200 l181 on ' ..-' ' • -• -.J Prev .. Au th. Cha·nge s (ADD) $ 0 ,... 3 -s u~~--- This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ -0- Amended -BB- Cm1tract Price s ? ')91 --4 -(") -,..::._t.~~-· ~- Approvell: CO UI·\TY SA?-; I'L \TI 0 N DI STRICT S of Orange County, California By ____ ~~~_:_--~~~~_.;...---~~--..~- L 1n c r ; : ;1 1 ~ 1 n c--~~ SULLY-!·'.iILL~~R COHTRACTDJG CC·:? /~~-;y Distrl.cts 1 & 7 RESOLUTION NO. 72-52 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-6-1 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 & 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING SUNJi'LOWER INTERCEPTOR, REACH 1, CONTRACT NOo 7-6-1 AS COMPLETE * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 & 7, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Sully-Miller Contracting Company, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for the.Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 1, Contract No. 7-6-1; on March 25, 1972; and, Section 2. That by letter, Boyle Engineering, District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and·, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said engineers' recommendation, which said recommenda- tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 1, Contract No. 7-6-1, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 10th ·day of March, 1971; and, Section 5. That the Chainnan of District No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1972. Agenda Item #51 -CC-Districts 1 & 7 cou:~TY SA:aTATIO:~ DISTRICTS OF O!?~A:;G[ cou:;ry P • 0 • Box 81 2 7 - 1 0 8 ·l 4 E 11 i s Av c nu c Fountain Valley, California 92708 CIIA~~GE OiWER JOB: ;iain-Jycr Intur"Cl!plor, :'.L:~u..:lies 25, 2G, 27 :j 23 -Contract 1-12 ,__,, Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEI}U:Ct:) $1,760.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract an<l/or contract work are hereby authorized an<l .as conpensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. . . REPERE>:CE: Adjustncnt of Engineer's Quantities ADD Chan~e l~stinJtctl l~uanti ty Item Unit Fr01a 1 o C.1an~e Unit Cost 9 11 19 DEDUCT V. F. V.F. L.F. 116 136 60 75 90 120 20 15 30 70.00 50.00 20.00 ADD ADD ADD TOTAL ADD Sl,400.08 750.00 600.00 $2,750.00 Chan!!C Estiuate<l Clu:-intitv Item Un it .. I= r on l. 1 o C j ~an:~ c f j ~ i it Co s t 10 22 V.F. C.Y. 38 10 30 0 H~d authorization date: ~-!a y 1 0 , 19 7 2 Af.~enda Item !/52 3 10 . 55.00 55.00 DEJ)UCT DEDUCT ,·. y 440.00 550.00 TOTAL DEDUCT $ 990.00 TOTAL Aim THIS CIIAXGE OEDl~n $1, 760. 00 Original Contract Price $'4z?,]tt6_.o...__o..._ __ _ Prev •. Auth. Changes ;ti $~ .. 1,osn.s0 This Change (ADD) (Pi:mw:~~J $ 1 1 760. oo Amended Contract Price SA74,956e59 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange C~unty, California By Districts 1 & 7 COU:·:TY SA:~I'L\TJu:~ DISTi~ICTS OF o~~\::GE cou:~TY P. 0. Box 3127 -lOo-14 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHA~~GE OlW~R c.o. DATE lW. .) 'l~v 10 $ l ~) 7 2 0.00 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) -------- In accordance \d th contract prov is ions, the fo I lowing changes in the .contract an <l Io r contract work a r e h c r c by author i z e d and a s comp ens at ion therefor, the following additions to or deductions from.the contract price are hereby approved. EXTL'~SIO~i 01~ TI;IE l11e contractor is hereby granted an extension of time· for the follo~dng: 1 • Pac i f i c C 1 a y Pro Ll u ct s 1·rn s u nab 1 c to <l c 1 iv er pipe to the job site frou l~ov 13, 1;~71 to Dec 3, 1971 due to lat:l~ of inve:ntory Time Ext.ens ion 21 calendar days 2. Inclement h'caU1er for the folloHing dates: 0 c t.. 2 0 -2 9 ' 1 9 7 1 Dec. 12-13, 1071 D cc • 2 2 -31 , 1 ~) 7 1 Tot~l tine extension Jue to. ,,·eather 2 cale1~dar· days 2 calendar clays 10 cal enJa r cla 'ts 14 ca 1 en Jar d a~· s ./ 3. The Contractor was unable to ~:wkc the co11- ·nectio11 and tie-ins for t~1c job hccrnse OCSU Project ;:o. 1-7-3 \:as not re~llly to accept s c \·:age u n t i 1 a ft er its ant i c i pa t c cl con p 1 ct ion <late Time Extension~ 33 caleridar days TOTAL TLlE EXTE:·lSIQl-; TIIIS CI!1\.\GE ORDEl~ 73 calen<l2r davs su:.fL\RY Original Contract ~late Original Contract Tin~e Ori~inal Completion iJate Tir.lC Ex tens ion Previous ChanQc Orders Tim c Ext ens ion Thi s C: la n ~~ e 0 ;_:de r Total Extension of Contract Tiuc Rev i ·s c c.l Contra c t Ti 11 e Revised Con1)letion j)Q.te Original August 2 6 ~ 1 ~) 71 180 cale1iJar days Fcb~uary 22, 1972 0 calcn(br davs 73 calentlar tl;ys 73 calendar davs 2 s 3 cal c;Hln.r <lays . i·-Ia y 5, 19 7 2 Contract Price $ 472 146.00 Prev •. Auth .. ChaFgcs $ 2,s10.s0 Bo'"'d authorization date: ~lay 10, 1972 Ar.;enda Item ://53 This Change (ADD)(DEDUCT) $ 0.00 Amended -EE·- Contract Price $ 4 7 ~i 9S6.S9 Approved: COOXTY SA~ITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By_·----------~....---~-...----Chio f En;; 111 ee :· t.iIKE ~IASA!WVICII co~~STIUJCTION CO~:I',\:~y By Districts 1 & 7 RESOLUTION NO. 72-79 · ACCEPTING . CONTRACT NO. 1-12 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 & 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING MAIN- DYER IN'TERCEPTOR, REACHES 25, 26, 27 & 28, CONTRACT NO. 1-12, AS COMPLETE * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 & 7, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Mike Masanovich Construction Company, Inc., has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for the Main-Dyer Interceptor, Reaches 25, 26, 27 and 28, Contract No. 1-12, on May 5, 1972; and, Section 2. That by letter, Boyle Engineering, District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the tern1s of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said engineers 1 recommendation, which said recornmenda- tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the Main-Dyer Interceptor, .Reaches 25, 26, 27 and 28, Contract. No. 1-12, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 26th day of August, 1971; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of District No.· 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting'held May 10, 1972. Agenda. Item #54 -FF-.Districts 1 & 7 • ORDINANCE NO. 715 AN ORDINANCE AMEIIDING ·ORDINANCE 711 fJ"1ENDIHG AITD HEA17FIHMING ORDIHANCE 712 AND REPEALING OHDINANCES '713 AND 714 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, does ordain as follows: ARTICLE 1 Ordinances 713 and 714 are hereby repealed. ARTICLE 2 Subsections 1, 2, and 3, Section (a), Article 2 of or·dinance 712 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section (a) of Article 6 of Ordinance 711 is amended to read as follows: (a) District Connection Charges. No application for a permit for a coill1ection to a District sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a District connection charge is paid by the applicant, provided, however, that such fee shall not be payable when a permit is issued for the re-connection or alteration of an existing connection for the same use made by the District or at the request of the District. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which establishes the use of said property. The following District connection charges are hereby established and shall b~ paid to the District or to an agericy designated by the District: (1) Regular Connection Charge, Residential Uses. (a) Single family dwellings. ·$175 per dwelling unit. Said charge shall be increased by $25.00 on July 1, 1973 and annually thereafter on July.1st for the next succeeding two years. Agenda. Item lf-59 GG-1 District 7 (b) Multiple dwellings. $250 per dwelling unit. A multiple dwelling is any structure designed or used for residential purposes, other than a motel or hotel, which would require use zoning of a greater density than R-1 zone as R-1 zone is defined in the Orange County Zoning Code, Section 78.0214.l through 78.0214.6 inclusive, if such zoning classification would be required to make the use of the subject property in conformity with applicable zoning standards of the County of Orange. (2) Regular Con..nection Charge, Commercial or Industrial Establishments. $437.50 per acre of area (computed to nearest l/lOth of acrajprovided that such charge shall not be less than $175 .. 00. The term "commercial or industrial estab- lishments 11 as used herein shall include motels, hotels and property owned or occupied by goverrunental agencies and non- .. profit organizations. Commencing on July 1, 1973, said charge per acre and minimum charge shall be increased to $500.00 and $200.00 respectively and annually on July 1 for the next succeeding two years, said charges shall be increased by $62.50 per acre and $25.00 respectively. (3) Trunk Connection Charge, Residential Uses. (a) Single Frunily Dwelling Unit. $6.oo per front foot f.or the real property fronting on and connecting to a trunk sewer provided that no such charge .shall be less than $400000 plus the applicable regular connection charge for ?ingle family dwelling hereinabove specified. (b) Multiple Dwelling Units. $6.oo per front foot for the real property fronting on and connecting to a trunk sewer provided that no such charge shall be less than $400.00 plus the applicable. regular connection charge for multiple family dwellings hereinabove specified. Agenda Item -#59 GG-2 Dlstrlct 7 ARTICLE 3 Article 18 of Ordinance 711 is hereby amended to read as follows: At least 45 days before any fonnal consideration of an amendment to this Ordinance, the Secreta~y shall notify, in writing, each public corporation performing as a local sewering agency in the District: Such notice shall also be mailed to any person who has filed a request for notification with the District and all established Chambers of Commerce in the District and the Orange County Cha.mber of Commerce. The notice shall contain a brief description of the nature of the amenqment to be considered and the time and place when formal action will be taken. ARTICLE 4 Except as herein amended, Ordinance 712 is ratified, reaffirmed and is to become effective July 1, 1972, as amended by this Ordinance. ARTICLE 5 The Chairman of the Board of Directors shall sign this Ordinance and the Secretary of the Districts shall attest thereto and certify to the passage of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be published once in the Tustin News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed, published and circulated in County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, within fifteen (15) days after the date of the passage of this Ordina.nce by said Board of Directors, and said Ordinance shall take effect July 1, 1972. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held May 10, 1972. Agenda Item #59 GG-3 District 7 H. LAWSON MEAD ATTORNEY AT LAW 20t4 NORTH BROADWAY SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706 542-6771 April 20, 1972 Board of Directors, County Sanitation Districts County Sanitation District #7 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Re: Annexation·No. 27 (Mead) Gentlemen: On behalf of Frank F. Mead, Lolita Mahoney and Nan M. Curran, who are the owners of approximately 120 acres east of Orange which is the subject of Annexation No. 27 to Sanitation District ·#7, I request that final action approving that annexation be postponed pending annexation of that same parcel to the City of Orange. It is hoped that annexation of this property to the City of Orange will be completed within sixty days. Very tr.uly yours, H. Lawson Mead HLM:cp Agenda. Item #60 -HH-District 7 ~-1 E ~ .. 1 0 R A N D u r .. r To: Fred A. Harper From: Ray E. Lewis Subject: Tract No. 6967 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE. COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAI~ VALLEY, CALIFORNl.A 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 The Engineering Departr;1ent has reviewed the request fron Farro\·: }J e v c 1 op u en t Corpora t ion on o eh a 1 f of F i rs t : ,'ester n Banl: rega.r<linr; t}1e annexation of a ;?Ortion of Tract 6967 to County Sn n it at ion J i st r i ct i: o . 7 T} ii s are a , ... as annexed to the City ·of Ora:a2e in June of 1969 and is ·proposeJ for residential iZ-1 development. ':fhc proposed dcve lopmen t is in conformity i.vi th the District's !-laster Plan anJ I hereby rccoanen<l that this request be presented to t~e Joard of Directors for their con- siclera tion. Ti1e development appears to be Hithin the parameters of tl1e I-laster Plan Report and within the policies set forth by the Board. REL: hj 1:i 5/5/72_ Agenda Item #6l(a) II-1 District 7 H H I I\) I ' I I P!ZOPOStO ANNfX A1lO.N oF A FOK1lON oF1RAGT G:>OJG,1 10 Dl'?1RlC1 N~7 ( . , <oc~r: N i~~oo' ·D < lC I \/f. PALMA~ I " FARROW DfVfLCF1"1tN1 CORP. RESOLUTION NO. 72-66-7 INITIATING PROCEEDINGS -ANNEXATION NO. 29 -PORTION OF.TRACT b967 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 29 -PORTION OF TRACT 6967) * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: That an application for annexation of territory to itself be made to the Local Agency Formation Commission as follows: Section 1. That this proposal is made pursuant to Division 1 . (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Govermnent Code of the State of California; and, Section 2. That this application is for the purpose of annexing approximately five acres, as requested by Farrow Develop- ment Corporation, Developers, and consented to by First Western Bank and Trust Company, owners of said property; and, Section 3. That the territory to be annexed is uninhabited; and, Section 4. That the designation assigned to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 29 -Portion of Tract 6967 11 , the boundaries of which are more particularly described and delineated on Exhibit "A" and· Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 5. That provisions for fees required to be paid as a condition of the annexation must _be satisfied prior to completion of annexation proceedings; and, Section 6. That request is hereby·made that such proceedings as required by law be taken to complete this annexation. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held 1'iay 10, 1972 .. ~~nda Item #6l(b) -JJ-District 7 Ap r i 1 12 , 1 9 72 Board of Di rectors County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attn: Mr. Fred Harper, General Manager Re: Jamboree Subtrunk Se\-1er (Main Street to 1200 Feet Northerly) Gent 1 emen: _The Irvine Industrial Comolex respectfully requests permission to construct a portion of the Master Planned Sewer System at the subject location. Since the line will be located outside of street right of way, the Complex wi 11 grant to the District a permanent easement for main- tenance purposes until the street is fully improved and dedicated to the City of Irvine. · the District's engineers will design, prepare specifications and improvement plans, stake and inspect the above project with the Complex awarding the contract to the lowest bidder after approval by the District. After construction is completed and the final costs tabulated, the Complex will request the District to prepare the usual. Reimbursement Agreement with the Complex for the said improv~ments. A map delineating the construction limits is enclosed for your reference. Very truly yours, ~~1~~ Michael J. Babbitt Senior Project Engineer MJB/gw encl. cc: Williamson and Schmid Agenda Item #62 21 22 Campus Ori110 I Box 4404 • lrv1no. California 9.2 664 • (714) 833-1010 -KK-District ·-r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF·RAMP. S~N DIEGO FREEWAY) May·10, 1972 Board of.Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County Subject: Report on receipt of sealed proposals for the construction of sanitary sewers and appu~tenances in Assessment District No. 9 Pursuant to the authority granted by Resolution No. 72-44-7, sealed proposals for construction of sanitary sewers and appurtenances in Assessment District No. 9 were received, publicly opened and examined on May 2, 1972, at 11:00 a.m. Proposals were received from three firms which are set forth on the attached bid tabulation. All bids were in compliance TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 with the Notice Inviting Bids and were accompanied by the required bid bond. JWS:rb Agenda Item #63(a) . ~~;:f-1 / .. / . / 'j[f/)l{_ ,, ,,/ { (,; f / :~\ ,/~. W:8jJne Sy,{ vest er . Secf6tary ~f the Board of Directors LL-1 District 7 En 0oinccr's Estinatc ~55 560 ~ ' . BI D T A B U L A T I 0 N S H E E T Contract For: S.:\:HTARY SE1:tER SYSTE~l ASSESS:lE~\T DISTRICT :\O. 9 * 1. 2. . 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. CONTRACTO~ Raymar Conpany Los Anp,eles Thunderbird Construction Santa .Ana City Construction Covina Agenda Item #63(a) -LL-2 Date ~ta y 2, 19 7 2 -11 : o o :\. ~ ! • TOTAL BID $ 71,SOQ $126,150 $176,600 District 7 "!? ~ /fa .!J [(}~f/$ ENGINEERING a ENGINEERS• ARCHITECTS . 412 SOUTH LYON STREET SANTA /\NA, CALIFORNIA 92702 • TELEPHON,E <714> 547-4471 ADDRESS REPLY TO P.O. BOX 178 J.tJy 4 I J 972 Delbert ~erby, M.D. 7034 Kakansa udvo Rsdcllng, CA 96001 Aslel-unent District Nt). 9 Bids w•re o;>en<KJ on tvhf 2, 1972 for construction of th& sonltory uwer In Assosament Olitrict r-~o. i. Three bids WOtll recuived Cl foilowa: Contractor Total Bid Raymor $ 7l,500 Thunderbird Conatructlon 126, lSO City Construction Company 176,600 The ~n1Jne«1 1 o!.tf mote for this wotk was $50,.560. Th" IOYtett bid of $71,500 r~preun~s o 42 oerc~t lncreoH ov~r the enqincar's eitimato for ccrutructlon and ot)~roxi:nata-fy a JJ porcont incroc.ie in o~eraH com whan 'lncldilntal oxpsnw1 ere 1nciud.d. At onaJn.eor of work, we wera diso~~otnted ln rc-~elot of onf y throe bids and olao by th~ t:>r~d of O'lttU $1G0 1 C~J b~twesn tr1• high and low tiiddor. (t oppaors thot the contractors were afraid of th~ ·eek conaltiont involved with this proloct and tha bids retiact th• tronehi~;J pr®iemt. When the lowest bid it •n aY.cesa of 15 parcent of the .enqlneer1 1 ettlmate, the 1911 Act ~·»roca0<1in~111 require tha f&'.1hlctlv• body to djro~t the clerK or 1.1era- tary to give notic.• i:>y moil of s~h incroose ov~r the e;timot~ ~w. ~.-h~ boald of dJreetori wiii mo~t on l'v\Jy iiJ, J ·172, ot which timtt thl1 directivo wiU no dovht bo given to th~ s-&Grotary cJf tho district. The board may aiao wont on •xptcHslon of opinion frcm ths property own•rs. P R 0 F E 5 S I 0. N A L ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES Agenda Item #63(b) MM-1 District 7 Pogo 2 Delbert Sowerby, lv\. D. Noy 4, 1972 The boord of directors hos the fol lowing courHS of adion open to them at the next board mes ting 1 · A. Awcrd tho contract to the IO"Nest btdder. 8. Raf oct ths bids and readvertlse in the hopo that lower btds wlll be · received. C. Abandon the prof ect. D. Modify th~ Re-sol utlon of Intention to allO\Y tho work to be ·done by tho property owners without the financing fe-otures Inherent in the 1911 Act proce~ing1. It Is our opinion as en·1ineer of work that, lf tho existing bids oro reie<:ted and new bids ore obtained, a siqnificant reduction in construction cost will not ja obtoinod. foe comtruction wiU also be d\jfoyed anorhor month. Wo sugg£st that tho prcn.erty owners writo the Boord of Dlr&eton of County Sanltotion Di~ttict No. 7 ~rior to thtt l\'\oy 10, 1 J72 mel!ting .and inform the b00td os to whet action the boord should toke regarding th. aword of tho contr°'t• ~(/~ Corl A Carlsen, C E. 6654 pp County Sanitation District No. 7 ~,· f.i.r. Frod A. t-'.arper ~. Arthur N.r.son Jaek J klmal a-co1-109-so Also sent to: · Frank F. Mead, Jr. 20002 East Chapman Avenue Orange, CA 92667 Sandy G. Moc Pherson 439 East Broadway Long Beach, CA 90802 County of Orange ~ Specialty Restaurants Orange Park Acres Mutual Water Co. c/o Real Property Services 400 Civic Center Drive \//est Santa Ana, CA 92701 (Attention Mr. Rich tv\:Jtheny) (-~ '":'":· ~ .~ ~ ::-.---2977 Redondo Avenue I• : ' • • '· ·--. '4 .., ---Long Beach, CA 90806 ·-j (Attention f'.i..r. Paul Schreiber) , .... , -\ ' . ' 29119 North tv\ain Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 BOYLE ENGINEER!NG Agenda Item #63(b) MM-2 District 7 Board of Directors 20002 E. Chapman Avenue Orange, California 92669 May ?, 1972 Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County P. o. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: We have received a letter notifying us that bids were opened on MaY 2, 1972 for construction of the sanitary sewer in Assessment District No~ 9o We were disappointed in the amounts shown in the 3 bids received; however, we have been informed that many other contractors did not bid because of the rock condition. We, therefore, feel that the contract should be awarded.to the low bidder and the for.nation of the district and the work should proceed as quickly as possibleo Truly yours ,,..--c_-<-. _,.__ ,-:_· / . . (.__ __ FRANX F. MEAD FFM/se BEATA G. MEAD Agenda Item #63(d-l) -NN-District 7 OFFICE HEMLOCK 6-6488 RES. GARFIELD 7-1479 DR. SANDY G. MACPHERSON DENTIST 433 EAST BROADWAY LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90802 May 8,1972 Board of Directors Sanitation Dist!'ict Ho. ? of Orange County P. o. Box 812? Fountnin Valley, California 92?08 Gen tl e."'Tlen: Tie have recieved a letter noti!':,ring us that bids ~ere opened· on r.:ay 2, 19?2 for construe ti on of tlle sani tur.r sewer in assessment District 1-:0. 9. Ile, therefore, feel that the contract should be ar:arded to the low bidder a."'16.. "'.;!le forr:-~ation of t::e district ar.d the work should :;;>roce·Jd as quickly us possible. Sincerely, · . ~-;· / J/' r; \.----·-·-. _/ y-?<:>_~,/0>,f:>,i:: "£,.~ _,. Sanay ;6. ~'-ac?n.8rson DD.:>. :; Agenda Item #63(d-2) -00-District 7 SPECIALTY RESTAURANTS May 8, 1972 2977 REDqNDO AVENUE TELEPHONE (213) 426-0451 Board of Directors Orange County Sanitary District No. 7 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: Subject: Construction of Sanitary Sewer in Assessment District No. 9 · BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90806 We have been informed of the bid results of the sanitary sewer designed by Boyle Engineering and, along with other parties involved, were disappointed at the increased costs. We are, however, vitally interested in the completion of the sewer line within the schedule originally planned. Along with the design engineers, we feel re-bidding and delaying the schedule will serve no useful purpose or result ·in any significant reduction in construction cost. We, therefore, would strongly support your decision to award the contract to the lowest bidder, if that decision were made. Very truly yours, SPECIALTY RESTAURANTS CORPORATION David C. Tallichet, President DCT/JRU/go Agenda Item #63(d-3) -PP-District 7 RENACER, INC. ~ LAND AND CATTLE,,~ 277 PEARL STREET LAGUNA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92651 /!hf!-8, 1972 Bocvul. o/ ObtedoM San.Liailon Ow:Utid Ao. 7 o/ OIUil?.[fe [oun.iy. 'P. Q. Box 8127 F ouniai.n. V alleffe [ali.(otmi.a 9 2708 yen.ilemen: [714] 494-6201 'i<~vull.ng ilte Leti.vt we !LeceLved nail-/~ U/.J ilw.i bi.d4 weA.e opened on frJay 2, 1972 {01t coMhw.cilon o/ the -danLimty. /.JeJ.1J€/l in /1--1/.Je-tJ&nen..i !Jldhtlci Aoo 9, J rmt4i exp1u?A/.J Oll/l -dUApll.We and d iAapf>Oinimerd. in i:h.e .. amoun.JA o/ the J bi.d4. We have le(l/l]led th.at. tAe Mch con.dLii.JJn cau/.Jed man!!-CJJnhuzcioM i.o wLih.old a bid.. U'e uou!d l.i.he i.h.e conhuzd io fJO io the Low bi.ddvi and uould lL~e the W<J_M to .dia!d:. GA .doon ad fXM.di..ble alonl} wlih the /ol'~n o/ ih.e dw- hz.Lci. 791/de · Agenda Item #63(d-4) -QQ-District 7 .• l 2 3 4 5 6 '1 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 RESOLUTION NO. 72-81-7 RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. ------- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOAiill OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALI- FORNIA, AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOH THE \VORK DESCHIBED IN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 72-42-7 OF SAID DISTHICT. The Secretary having duly and regularly, pursuant to Resolution No. 72-44-7, adopted April 12, 1972, opened, examined and declared all sealed proposals or bids for the following work to be done and improvements to be made in this Dist_rict, to-wit: The construction of sanitary sewers and all appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection therewith in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9" in said County S~nitation District No. 7 of Orange County, all as more parti- cularly described in Resolution of Intention No. 72-42-7, passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said Sanitation District on March 21, 1972; and The ~ecretary havjng duly and regularly reported to this Board of Directors the results of the said bidding at this meeting, which is the next regular meeting following the opening of said bids; and For further particulars, reference is hereby made to said Resolution of Intention No. 72-42-7, and to the plans, profiles and drawings on file in the offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work of said sanitation district, and to the specifications for the said work heretofore adopted by the said Board of Directors and on file in the offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work for said district, and all of said plans, profiles, drawjngs and speci- fications heretofore approved by the Board of Directors of said County Sani- tation ·District No. 7 of Orange County are incorporated herein and reference is hereby made thereto for a more particular description of said work; and Said Boa rd of Di recto rs has detc rmined and declared that the con - templated work and improvement heretofore mentioned was, in the opinion of sajd Board of Directors, of more than local or ordinary public benefit, ., and the said Board of Directors has made the expense of said work charge~blc 31 upo'n a district. For the particular descl'iption of said district, reference is 32 he re by made to said He solution of Intention No. 7 2-42-7. LA.YI OFl"ICF.S OF RlMEL, HARVCY Sc LOGAN FOUl!Tll fLOOR SC\10 Nonni .. ~AIN 6T. 6A~ITA ANA, Cl.L!l'"Cl~NIA P270, 11 Agenda Item !163(e) RR-1 District 7 l Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that serial 2 bonds, bearing interest at the rate of seven per cent (7%) per annum and 3 extending over a pe"riod ending nine {9) years from the second day of January 4 next succeeding the next September 1st following their date, will be issued 5 hereunder in the manner provided by the "Improvement Act of 1911," being 6 Part 5, Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, 7 to represent each assessment of Fifty Dollars {$50. 00) or more remaining 8 unpaid at the expiration of the last date fixed· for payment of assessment in 9 t~e notice to property owners mailed pursuant to the provisions of Section 5390 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and 11 Said Board of Directors has elected and determined to have the 12 redemption provisions of said bonds provide a premium of five per cent (5%) 13 of the unmatured principal in accordance with the provisions of Section 6464 14 of the Streets an? Highways Code of the State of Calif.ornia; and 15 All of the work herein ordered shall be done and carried through in 16 pursuance ofanAct of the Legislature of the State of California, designated 17 the "Improvement Act of 1911," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways 18 Code; 19 NOW·, THEREFORE, the Board of Di rectors of COUNTY SANITATIO'" 20 DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, California, does RESOLVE and 21 ORDER as follows: 22 That this Board hereby rejects all of the said proposals or bids excep 23 the next hereinafter mentioned, and hereby aviards the contract for the said 24 work and improvement to the lowest, regular and responsible bidder, to-wit: 25 RAMAR COMPANY, 2235 India Street, Los Angeles, California 26 at the prices named in their bid for said work, on file in the office of the 27 Secretary of said County Sanitation District No. 7. 28 The Secretary of said District is hereby directed to cause a Notice 29 of Award of Contract to be published in the manner and form required by said 30 Code in the OHANGE CITY NEWS, a nc\vspapcr published and circulated in 31 said District and he re by designated by the said Board for that purpose. 32 ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 10th day of LAW OFf'ICEB Of' RIMC:L. HAnVCY & LOGAN t•ourtTH FLOOR 1010 NOIHtl MAIU ST, ,Agenda Item #63(e) District 7 RR-2 6ANTA. ANA, I I ,. l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ~ 28 29 30 31 32 LAW OFF"ICES OF RIMEi_ HARVEY & LOGAN FOURTH f"LOOft 1010 HOllTH l<1AIN ST, f>ANTA IH4A, CAl..IYCHN!.&. 9270, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary Agenda Item #63(e) RR-3 District 7 TO 5/10 Meeting File FROM Rita M-E-M-0-R-A-N-D-U-M DATE 5/16/72 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SUBJE~ ~~~~~--~--~---~~~~~- Called Supervisor Caspers' secretary and advised her of the Executive Committee Meeting, which was called at the regular May meeting for which Mr. Caspers was absent , to be held on May 31st at 5:30 p .m . MINUTE EXCERPTS RECEIVED FROM THE FOLLOWING: , ' ':"" ,./ - ___. '_, • ./ Anaheim Cypress Fountain Valley Fullerton La Habra Newport Beach Villa Park Orange County Board of Supervisors (Minute excerpts for other cities were received & filed at 4/27/72 meetings of District 2 & District:. 3c\ll) l COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 2 MINUTES FOR AWARD OF CONTRACT 3 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9 4 5 The Secretary notified the Board that this is the time and place for 6 the Board to consider the Secretary's written report of the bids received 7 pursuant to Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals for the construction of sanitary 8 sewers and appurtenances and appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 9 NO. 9," as contemplated by Resolution of Intention No. 72-42-7. 10 The Secretary further notified the Board that pursuant to the 11 authority granted him by Resolution No. 72-44-7, he did on May 2, 1972, 12 publicly receive, open, examine and declare -..".. bids. Reference is ----- 13 hereby made to the bids on file with the Secretary for details as to the unit 14 prices and kinds or classes of work to be done. 15 The Secretary then presented to the Board of Directors his written 16 report upon the said bids so received. The Engineer of Work then reported 17 to the Board that he had checked and tabulated all of the bids received for the 18 said work as described in Resolution of Intention No. 72-42-7, and that the bid 19 20 21 of Dollars 22 is the lowest regular bid received for said improvement. 23 Director then offered and moved the adoption of -~-------- 24 RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. , awarding the con------ 26 at the prices named in said bid, which said bid being the lowest regular bid 27 submitted for said improvement. The motion was seconded by Director 28 29 30 31 32 LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL, HARVEY Sc LOGAN FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 and upon roll call vote said Resolution of Award of Con- ~~~~~--~~~- tract No. was adopted by the following roll call vote: ------ AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ... May 10, 1972 Meeting Minutes excerpts were received and filed from the fo llowing: Anaheim, Cypress , Fountain Valley, Fullerton, LaHabra, Newport Beach, Villa Park, and the County Board of Supervisors . Annual Election of Chairmen : District 1 District 2 District 3 District 5 District 6 District 7 District 11 Lorin Griset nominated . Moved & seconded nominations cease . Motion carried. Don Smith nominated . Moved & seconded nominations cease . Motion carried . Norman Culver nominated . MOved & seconded nominations cease. Motion carried. Don Mcinnis nominated . Moved & seconded nominations cease . Motion carried . Ellis Porter nominated. Moved & seconded nominations cetBe. Motion carried. Clifton Mi l ler nominated. Moved & seconded nominations cease . Motion carried . Norma Gibbs nominated. Moved & seconded nominations cease . Motion carried . Alvin Coen appointed Chairman pro tern for District 11 in the absence of Norma Gibbs. #13 -Report of Joint Chairman Called a meeting of the Executive Committee for 5:30, Wednesday, May 31st, and invited Directors Donald Fox and Robert Root to attend . They thought they would .be able to come . Announced that Mr . Harper had been elected the 1972 -73 President of the California Water Pollution Control Association and congratulated him . Advised that there would be an indoctrination meeting and tour for the new Directors and asked if May 17th or 18th would be satisfactory . Could not attend then because of a Mayor 's Convention.aN~x Changed the date to June 1st and eight of the new Directors said they could attend then . It will be held from 5:30 to 8:30 p .m. and a light dinner will be served . #14 -Report of General Manager Mentioned that the new Directors would be receiving Directors' Elbow Books regarding Districts ' organization, rules, agreements , etc . at the June 1st indoctrination meeting. Report ed that Assembly Bill 21 46 being sponsored by our Districts to make it possible to reduc e Directors ' fees, and bein g handled by Ken Norris, Legislative Advocate for CASA , will be heard at Committee l evel for the first time tomorrow (5/11). Should have the printed Bill tomorrow or the next day . Ment ioned that our Laboratory program included monitoring on a daily basis 14 miles of coast line , and introduced Ted Dunn who presented a slide program on the Laboratory Department . Mr . Harper also introduced ot her members of the staff and briefly exp l a i ned what their depar tments function was . #15 -Report of General Co unsel & #43 (Dist . 3 &4 Consolidation) No special report but asked that none of the District 3 Directors leave before Item No . 43 on th e Agenda was brought up . It was moved and seconded that Item 43 be taken up right then. N~sson briefly summa ri zed item: Consolidation Agreement is a culmination of study recommended by General Ma nager . District 4, outside of J oint Organization , is City of Seal Beach . That District will pay to District 3 a fee equivalent to a n annexation fee. Will come into District 3 without any obl i gations and when it comes in , Dis trict 4 assumes obligations of District 3 . Name of District will be District 3 . Seal Beach has approved agreement and feel p.2 their condi tions are adequa t e and in compl ian ce with National Concept of Sanitation and Sewage Control, and is a step toward reduction of special districts by consolidating into one District . Battin asked, if this consolidation goes through, will Redevelopment Agency take Redevelopment property off County tax rolls? Nisson answered , it will not do anything to take it out of County tax roll s as such. Improvements to be made will not come on to be taxed for a period of 15 years but existin g value assessments will be Ltaxed. What is consolidation fee that will be paid over 5 year period? Would it be a normal fee . Nisson: Yes , would be a norma l fee . Eq u ival ent to fee that District 3 would , by its established policy , charge an area that would be annexed to the District . Motion made to authorize execution of Consolidation AGreement . Was seconded and passed by unanimous roll call vote . #19 -Report of Special Committee on agreement with OCWD Mcinni s stated that agreement wa s brought to Joint Boards previously . Agreement was not acceptable so special committee was formed study and make recomme n dations (Mcinnis , Smith & Wedaa). Committee met twice and came to an ag~ment . Mcinnis met with Districts ' staff and staff of OCWD . OCWD counter proposal was that water re delivered free for eight more years, to 1~80 . In 1980 and every five years , that Sanitation Districts amend agr e em e nt to provide for payment by Sanitation p .3 Districts fo r any benefits from Water District or payment by OCWD to Sanitation Districts for any cost savings by Water District . As Chairman of the Special Committee , Mcinnis felt he completely wasted his t i me meeting with OCWD r epresentative. OCWD attempted to develop formu la for wastewater and i n cluded in WD agreement. Not acceptable to committee based on these facts: "Agreement does have economic val ue but we , as Directors , do not have right either legally or mora lly to give anything of value belonging to the general p.i.blic away ." Suggested that our staff contact various agencies in our a r ea to determine economi c water value today. Special Comm i ttee recommends that either of the following a l ternatives be considered: (1) Accept Special Committee 's draft agreement dated March 30 , 1972 , as wr i tten ; or (2) Accept the Special Committee 's agreement , in principle , and inform Water District that their version of I tem 1 under agreement is not acceptable. FAH : From the staff 's viewpoint , we like the committee 's second recommendation which would be to agree to the agreement in principle, except that item No. 1 in agreement (what Water District proposes is not accep t abl e ). This agreement is really imp0rtant to Water District -First of a ll, Water District has a state and federal grant of some $1 5 mil lion for faci l ities next door and won 't recei v e any f unds u ntil agreeme n t is appr oved . Also the condition that was made on tlie 1971-72 grants , wh i ch exceed $7 or 8 million of state and federal funding , was that we enter into a reasonable agreement with the Water District . We have received the first payment under the terms of the grant program (about 25% -$2 million) Also received a letter that we would not receive any future payments .unti l this matter is resolved , so is important that we get this taken care of . Our recommendation is to accept agree - ment in principle (Recommendation No . 2). This was moved and seconded. Griset asked : Water District is not will i ng to nail down water value , is that cor r ect? Mcinnis read WD version of this portion of agreement. The question was asked if revision to agreement would be brought back to Board for their final approval & answer was , yes . Wedaa stated that Exhibit "N " was provided to District and was the value of wastewater according to nine different similar agencies in the area . I f everybody else is selling water, why shouldn't we? ? said it should be paid for in advance . Motion to approve agreement in prihciple and send back to Special Committee was carried . p . 4 #20 -Accepting proposal of Terry & Assoc . Baker : Proposal suggests they will provide EIS in accordance with state and federal guide l ines . Whater do they have avai l able and what KN~~ do they mean? PGE: SWRCB has prepared guidelines and also .EPA. State guidelines have been out about a year but federal guidelines haven 't been finally passed . Baker asked if he could have a copy of guidelines and answer was, yes. #22 -Report on participation in SCCWRP by SWRCB & EPA . Parsons reported that about three years ago the five major sanitation agenc i es of Southern California 's coastline decided there was little or no information on discharge of sewage in water. They joined together to study ef~ect of discharge on ocean water . (County of Ventura , City of LA , LA Sanitauon Districts, OCSD, and City of San Diego) Assembled information throughout the world & expect to have first 3 -year report in October . Wi l l have a considerable affect on determining what is happening out there . Have five of the finest consultants in the world in the filed of Oceanography and Public Health & they are bringing the first studies to a conclu~ion . Politically , this has been a great thing for all of these agencies. Have been able to hold off strict guidelines that were about to be laid re discharge into ocean. F~~~ Believe that if we get rid of certain toxic materials at source would not have to go to secondary treatment. Cost of secondary treatment at $1/2 Bill ion to $600 Million. May not have to go to seconaary treatment that they are tryingg to require. Memo indicates that SWRCB has awakened to what we are doing and wou l d like to take project over . Project is of worthwhile significance and should be state and federally funded . Doesn't think we sho~ld turn result of present efforts over to these agencies as they have proposed; however , Commission has recommended that MR. Bond and Mr . Parsons go to Sacramento and discuss project with SWRCB . Mr . Bond has asked Commissioners to check with their supporting agencies to see if they are still inclmned to accept federal and state support . Under their proposal would ~t up three -man steering committee--one from EPA , one from SWRCB and one from our company . This is totally unacceptable . Haven't given us any dollar figures as to how much they want to spend in helping with our project but want us to be paying administrative expenses. Shou l d tal k with SWRCB and maybe give them a couple seats on Commission . They should pay a large part of the fund i ng on this project . Whatever is negotiated will have to come back to the Board for approval . Parsons ended by saying, "Am asking how you fee l about the contintil.ing efforts to get state and fedeEal funding in this project and also if you fee l that the Commission is taking the right course to go to Sacramento and discuss it?" Griset moved to accept recommendation of Linds l ey Parsons. Motion · was seconded and carried. p. 5 #25 -Other business Don Smith mentioned that recently Santa Ana Region of Water Quality Control Board approved waste discharge standards for Green River Mobile Home Park and discharge is not up to standards . OCWD and City of Orange . are ver~ concerned. Didn 't know if there was is anything we can do about this . FAH said Water District has taken this matter to State Board and didn 't know whether it would be in order for us to do anything on this . Will look into it and report back to Executive Committee. #39 -Request of Calif . State College at Fullerton to extend initial billing period & waive delinquency charge Herrin asked what the feeling was on waiving delinquency charges. County doesn't do it . Finnell asked if this would be sebting a precedent. a JWS mentioned one other case where a firm applied for/permit and Board passed resolution waiving delinquency charge. FAH stated that this request was because of a budget problem . Herrin said that County doen 't buy that when h e tells them that. It was asked if this was a one-time dea l ? Answer was yet, to get it on a fiscal basis . Asked how much delinque ncy fee was and was answered, about $200 . Someone said that that amount was not worth an ar g ument so moved the request be approved. Motion was seconded and carried. #41 -FAH men~ioned that tomorrow at 11:00 bids would be opened for first reach of Santa Ana River Interceptor . #59 -Roll call vote on Ordinance 715 . Ordinance adopted . #6 0 -Deferral of Mead annexation. Smith recommended it be continued after 90 days for annexation to City of Orange. #63(a) -Moved, seconded and carried . #63(b) -Reported that there were three bids. Read bidders ' names and amounts . Bids were higher than estimate but believe low bid is a real istic one and that reviewing bids a nd re-advertising would not result in any better pric e s . Low bidder not happy about that amount but will do the job . Talked to bonding house and they recommend him highly . Recommended that contract be awarded to Ramar Company. #63(c) -Rimel mentioned that one provision of Act provides that when total amount of bid by lowest responsible bidder exceeds 15 % of eng ineer 's estimate a s stated in Re s olut i on of Intention, the cle rk s h a ll b e direct e d to g ive notic e by mai l of th e e stima t e d cos t . This will h a v e t o b e done . p . 6 Rimel talked to Mac Brown, who served on this legislative committee, and he advised this was a compromise--didn 't make any provisions that you couldn 't award bid but usually recommended that the Board would order notice given and wait a reasonable time to award contract (maybe until the next meeting). Have reviewed letters from four owners which represent about 90% of property owners. 100% signed on protest to waive Majority Protest Act. It is Rimel's opinion that we could award contract but should require Secretary to write letters to property owners. Motion was moved and seconded that we do so . Motion carried . #65 -DISTRICT 7 Other business Smith mentioned that City Council had approved authorization to proceed with negotiations with Brandel(?) Estate Properties and suggested that if Board so desires to w~F direct staff to work with City Engineer on amending original request from City of Orange, that trunk routing be approved. Three proposals to study and report to the Board on that portion of it. Lewis reported that he has been in contact with Cit~'s staff and reviewed arrangements proposed by the City. Has been some recent developments in the area of pe0pfue in the OPA tract not wanting sewers at the present time, and petitioned Board of Supervisors for sewers in area. Will meet with City's -staff and Mr . Dickinson next week and will report back . Smith just wantedto be sure that staff is directed to keep working on development . Loel Kuinge, OPA, was recognized by Chairman and stated that the peop l e of OPA were interested in sewer lines and wanted to do it in a right manner. Understands that since 1969 Handy Creek Nas is major fall ine in OPA. A Greenbelt area is anticipateda along Handy Creek. Developing this line along creek bend, Reach 1, will not serve major part of OPA . More fitting to take a look at the whole area and do justice for everybody . Al l of those South of Chapman Avenue should be considered too as part of District 7 . Only fitting and proper to consider whole area, not just Nohl(?) RAnch . Also should include Irvine Park . Should consider whole drainage area . Smith restated that he was just asking if engineer would work with City of Orange and actions would still be proceeding . Kuinge said that present line does not include all of area & that there are three routes to be considered. Nisson stated that area should be annexed to District & is not in District now. EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, OF O~NGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County ;,."'-' Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., May 10 , 19 72 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary r~~orteg a quorum present for each District's Board. * * * * * * * * * DIS1·RICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: d;J ourrnnent 'l'h.:Jt thi:.; r11eeting of tt·e Board of Directors of Cou.nty Sanitation Di.strict i~o. 2 be adjourned to £;:ay 24, 1972, a i~ 5: 30 p . .ri1. The C!1uirman t!-1.e.n declared tr!e meeting ~o adjourned at 8:57 p.m .. _, i.~dy 10, 1972. STATE. OF CALIFORNIA~ SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11~ of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and_correct copy of minute entries on m~eting of said Boards of Directors on the 10th day of r•.i.ay 19 72 ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 10th day of May, i9·72. of Directors Nos. ?-~ and 11 S-107