Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972-04-12II -. MANAGER 'S AGENDA REPORT Coun t y San itation Dist rict s of O ra nge County, Cal i forn ia JOINT BOARDS REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, April 12, 1972 7:30 p .m. Post Office Sox 8 127 l 0844 Ellis Avenue Fount ain V alley, Calif., 92708 T elephones: Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 Ap r i l 7, 1972 ATTENTION ALL DIRECTORS : Due to the current construction in Ell is Avenue in the immediate vicinity of the entrance to the Administrative offices all incoming traffic is being detoured . A map has been enc l osed with the notice of the meeting to direct vehicular traffic to the Garfield entrflllce to our treatment faci l ities. DISTRICT NO. 3 DIRECTORS PLEASE NOTE: Chairman Hyde has called a special meeting of the Board for 6:30 p .m., pri or to the joint meeting, to consider the proposed consolidation of County Sanitation District No . 4 (see discussion under District No . 3 business) and to discuss sewe r age of a 20 acre parcel west of District No. 3 on Westminster Ave nue (see Item No . 13). The Boa r d of Di r ectors of Di strict No . 4 has been invited to meet jointly with our Board . DISTRICT NO. 7 DIRECTORS PLEASE NOTE : The r e wi l l be an adjourned meeting of the Board at 7:00 p .m., prior to the joint meeting to hold t he required protest hearing on Assessment District No. 9. A separate agenda for this meeting is inc l uded in this mai l ing . * * * * * * * * * * * The fol lowing is a brief explanation of the more imp ortant non- r outine items whic h appear on the enclosed agend a and which are not othe r wise self-explanatory. Warrant l ists are .not at t ached to the agenda since they are made up immediate l y preceding the meeting but wi ll appear in the complete agenda avail able at the meeting . * * * * * * * * * * * Joint Boa r ds No. 6 -REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER: The staff will report .on r ecent d eve l opments concerning the new Federal water pollution cont r ol leg is- l ation and the regulations of the State Water Resour ces Cont r ol Board regard ing ocean di sposal of wastewater. Nos . 8 and 9 -REPORT OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND ACTIONS ON COMM ITTEE'S RECOMMENDATIONS : The Committee met on the evening of Ma rch 28 with Directors Hi rth and Wed aa as g uests. A report of the meeting, together wi th recommendations to the Joint Boards, was mailed on April 4 . I tem No . 9 (a and b) is cons i deration of actions recommende d by the Committee to the Joint Boards. ; No. 10 -CO NSENT CALE}IDAR: The following agenda items fa+l into this category in accordance with the definition establ ished by the Boards : (a) Award of Printing Spec ifications -The enginee!ing department staff has recently revised and updated the s t andard specifi- cations por tion of ou r p l ant job specifications . Since this section is us ed in a ll p lant specifications without change, it is ove r-a ll more economical to print this material than to Xerox it. Accordingly, the motion appear- ing on the agenda is recommende d. (b) Change Order No . 3 to Pl ant Job No . I-8 -This job, the Interplant Influent I nte rc eptor, is making r apid progress along Brookhurst Street. During the construction of a trans ition structure at Plant No. 2 it became obvious that a revision of the plans was needed, as described in the formal change order included with the agenda material. The contractor has invoiced the Districts f or an additional amount of $1,525.34 for this extra wo rk on a time and material basis . We recommend adoption of the change o r de r. (c) Change Order No . 2 to Pl ant Job No . I -7 -3 -This job, Pump Station and Additions to Bypass Facilities at Plant No. l, is practically complete but since a few items of work remain before operational testing, it cannot be accepted until the May Joint Board meet ing . During con- struction two items of work not originall y inc l uded in the contract were required, as described in the formal change order included with the agenda materia l. This extra work will add $1,3 L~8 .65 to the contract price. The change order also g r ants an extension of time of 88 cal endar days for the reason shown on the change order . (d) Attendance of Di rector of Finance at California As$o ciation o f Sanit ation Ag enci e s -Thj_s association, in which the Districts actively p a rticipate, has proved to be a very viable and valuab l e organization for represent i ng the interests of sewerage agencies , particularly in the legislative field at the State level. Mr . Syl veste r was re cently elected a Dire ctor of the Association and will be a member of its Executive Board. Accordingly, we recommend that he be given authorization to attend meetings and functions of the Association deemed to be· of concern to· our Districts. Nos. 1 2 and 13 -SEWERAGE OF AREA WEST OF DI STRICT NO. 3 ON "WESTMINS TER AVENUE : At a recent District No . 3 Board meeting the request of a developer for service throug h our system for a 20 ac re parcel west of the District boundary on Westminster Avenu e in Los Angeles County was considered. The staff was then directed to pursue the matte r further . A memorandum describing developments on this subject since that time and setting forth the staff's recommendations is included in the agenda material. The Joint Ownership, Op .era ti on and Con struction Agreement , under which the Districts operate, spec ifies that no Di str ict can serve -2- areas outside its boundaries without the consent of the other six Districts and their approval of the financial arrangements for this service. Accordingly, all Districts must take action on this matter (Item No. 12) as well as District No. 3 (Item No . 13). Districts Nos. 5 and 6 No. 21 -AUTHORIZING PAYMEI--rI' FOR BACKHOE RENTAL: In order to determine in the field the locations of possibly interfe ring utilities in the construction of the Coast Highway Force Ma in, the District 's engineer recommen ded that these utilities be exposed at 57 different critical locations. This required the services of a skilled backhoe ope r ator . According ly, we authorized the Heitman Equipment Company, Inc., the firm submitting the lowest hourly rate for a back.hoe and operator, to proceed with the work. The Company's final invoice ($2,83<5) exceeds the staff's authorization without Board approval. The action appearing on the agenda in this connection is accordingly recommended. Districts Nos. 3 and 11 No. 29 -NEW AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF KNOTT INTER- CEPrOR: The two Districts entered into an a greement in October, 1 970, providing that District No. 3 will construct and operate that portion of the Knott Interceptor which will be jointly mmed . During the preparation of a n application fo r a Federal and State grant on t his project it was learned that this agreement is deficient for g rant purpo9es since it does not specifically provide for sharing between the Districts of g rant funds . According ly, we recommend that the r esolution included with the agenda material be a dopted, which will rescind the old agreement and adopt a new one with this pTovision included. District No. 11 No. 31 -APPROVAL OF ANNEXATION NO. 16: The sma ll p a rcel on which the former Sunset Beach Sanitary District treatment p lant was located and on which will be constructe d a new City of Huntington Be ach fire station is being a nnexed to the City and will require annexation to the District to obtain sewer service. The staff has checked the annexa- tion reque sted by the City and finds it to b e in order and, a cco~ding ly, we recommend Board authorization to proceed with the annexation . Our investigation disclosed that the parcel has be e n withdrawn from the Sunset Beach Sanitary Dist rict in which it was formerly included . District No. 2 No. 36 -CONSIDERATION OF REQUESTS FOR ANNEXATION TO THE DISTRICT: Included with the agenda material are two such requests, one from the City of Anaheim of app roximately 300 acres and the other from Anaheim Rills, Inc., for approximately 1025 acres . The City annexa tion request is property for a g olf course and water reservoir and is surrounded by the proposed Anaheim Hills annexation. Accordingly, the staff recommends that these two anne x a tions be combined into one p roc eedings . It will b e noted that the City has request e d waiver of payment of annexation fees ($369 ·per acre) for all but four acres of its annexati6n and ·Anaheim Hills, Inc., has r eque sted a similar waiver for 19.15 acres of land occupied by three easements . Anaheim -3- Hills, Inc . has a l so requested that the total annexation fee established be paid by means of ad valorem tax on the land pro-rated over five years . We have prepared memorandums (inc l uded in the agenda material) on these two annexations which goes into g r eater detail and contain the staff 's recommendations . No. 37 -APPROVAL OF PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION : If the Board concurs with the staff's recommendations on the above consolidated annexation, the action indicated on the agenda under this item is recomme nded . No. 38 -RESOLUTION AUTHORIZI NG APPLICATION FOR GRANT FOR SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCE PTOR: The recently concluded agreement with the Chino Basin Municipal Wa ter Dis trict reg arding use of the Santa Ana Rive r Interceptor and Districts' treatment facilities makes necessary a new application for Federal and State grants. Accordingly, we recommend approval of the resolution included with the agenda material. No. 39 -AUTHORITY FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ON SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR: The James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc ., employed by the Chino Basin Municipal Water District, is now completing an environ- mental impact statement for this project. The Regional Wa ter Quality Control Board staf f has requested that two public hearings be held on this statement, one in Orange County and the second in the upper basin. We therefore recommend that the staff be authorized to conduct these publiG hearings. No . 40 -ADDENDUM NO . 1 TO PLANS AND SPECI FIC ATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 2-14-1: Bids for this project, Santa An.a River Interceptor Sewe r from Reclamation P lant No . 1 to Katella Avenue, were to h ave been opened on April 6 . However, because o f the fact tha t the status of Federal grants on a reimbursable basis are now unc e rtain, t h e staf f issued an addendum postponing the bid date to May 11. This addendv111 (copy enclosed with agenda ma terial) also makes one technic a l chang e in the specifications and includes the Orange County Flood Control Dist rict permit for use of that District 's property for a portion of the interceptor . We recommend its adoption . District No . 3 No. (a) (6 :30 p.m . Spec i al Meeting notice) CO NSOLIDATION OF DISTR ICT NO . 4: This matter has been discussed previously and at the March 8 meeting the staff was directed, a fter discussions with the City of Seal Beach, to arrange for a joint Board meeting of Districts Nos . 3 and 4 to discuss terms for the consolidation . A letter from the City of Seal Beach on this subject, together with our memorandum is included with the special meeting notice . No. 44 -ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CONTRACT NO. 3-17-1 : This project, the Bolsa Relief Tru..Dk Sewe r, is proposed to be con str uc ted jointly with a City of Westminster storm drain. This matter was conside red at the March 8 Boa rd meeting and ~he staff directed to obtain a proposal from the District's engineers for design services . The proposal is fnclude·d in the agenda materi a l and we r ecommend that it -4- be accepted and the engineers authori ze d to proceed with the desi gn after s atisfactory assurance that the City will pay for its share of the design cost. No. 45 -ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CONTRACT NO. 3-18: This p r oposed project, Knott Inte rc eptor, Reach 4, is the next p l anned in~r ement of the Knott Interceptor system as described in t h e District 's 1968 Mas ter Plan. When const ructed, it wi ll carry the Knott Interceptor to the inte r section of Westminster Avenue and Go ldenwest St r eet, plus a b ranch running west on Westminste r to Edwards Street, a total distance of approximate ly 3 mi l es . We have requested·a proposal from the District 's engineer for desig n services for this project wh ich is included with the agenda material and further describes the project . It is recom- mended that the proposal be accepted and the engineers authorized to proceed with the design . No. 46 -AWARD ON CONTRACT NO . 3-17: Bids for this p ro ject, Knott Interceptor, Reaches 1, 2 , and 3, were opened on March 9 with a total of ten bids received for this wo rk, estimated to cost in excess ·Of $6 milli on . As c an be seen from the bid tabulation included with the agenda material, the bidding was excellent from the standpoint of the Districts, seven proposals being be low the engineer's estimate . It is imperative that we proceed with this project at the ear l iest possible moment to r elieve a projected overloading of the existing District's system in the near future . Because of the un - certainty as to the status of Federal g r ant s on reimbursable projects, the staff recommends po stponing designating a...r1 awa r d date until this status can be possibly clarified by congressional act ion. We there - fore Tecomme nd the adoption of the r esolution awa 1·dine; the contract to the J . F . Sh ea Comp a ny, o f Walnut, the low bidder, with the actual award date to be estab lished by the General Manage r. Nos . 47, 48 and 49 -COMPLET IO N AND ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT NO . 3-16 : This contract, the Beach Bou l evard Relief Trunlc Sewe r, wa s completed some time ago but, as described in previous agenda reports, acceptance has been held up pendin g settlement with the contractor of his clai m for extra compensation due to stricter requirements f or compac tion being imposed by the State Division of Highways than called fo r in the contrac t d ocuments . His cla im for extra compensation in this matter at one tim e was app roximatel y $30,000 but after negot iations between him, the General Counsel and the staff, he agreed to a settle- ment of $7 ,500 in lieu of fi ling a lawsuit against the District . This sum, together with an item of extra wo rk for additional paving in the amount of $750 is provided for in Change Order No . 6 attached to the a g enda material . Change Orde r No . 7, also as agreed to as part of the above settlement, g rants an extension of time to the contract of 77 days . Item No . 49 is the r esolut ion approving a f inal closeout agr eement embodying the above settlements and the waiving by the contractor of his right to file further claims . This resolution als o accepts the work as complete and a uthori zes the filing of a Notice of Completion. -5- . :;;. District No. 7 No. 53 -REPORT ON SUBTRUNK SEWER TO SERVE PORTION OF ORANGE PARK ACRES: An interim report on this matter was presented at the March 21 adjourned Board meeting and action was deferred to this meeting pending rece ipt of further information from the City of Orange. If. this information is received before the meeting, a further report ·will be made. No. 54 -ORDERING ANNEXATION NO. 27: This 120 acre annexation has been previously approved by the Board, subject to arrangements for paying of fees. A note secured by a deed of trust sig ned by the owners and proponents has now been sighed and it is recommended that the annexation be ordered . No. 55 -PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TRACT 6927: Included with .the agenda. material is a request for an annexation of a five acre parcel fronting on the west side of Santiago Bou levard, approximately 330 feet south of Collins Avenue. We recormnend that the request be referred to the staff for report and recomm endation. Nos. 56, 5G and 58 -CLOSEOUT OF CO NTRA CT NO. 7-6-1: This contract for the Sunflower Interceptor between Plant No . 1 and Raitt Street has now been satisfactorily completed. Two change orders (included in the agenda material) are recommended for adoption prior to acc eptance. Change Order No. 7 (Item No. 56) deducts the swn of·$7,676 from the contract as an adjustment in final contract price to reflect quantities of material a ctually insta lled on a unit price basis as compared wi th the quantities originally estimated. Change Order No. 8 (Item No . 57) grants an extension of time o f 16 days to the contract for the reasons stated in the formal chang e order. Item No . 58 is the customary reso- lution accepting the job as complete and ordering filing of a Notice of Completion. Nos. 59, 60, 61, and 62 -COMPLETION OF CONTRACT NO . 7 -6-2 : This contract for the Sunf l ower I nterc eptor from Raitt Stree t to Main Street h as now been satisfactorily completed. Prior to acceptance three change orders (included in agenda material) are r ec ommend ed for adoption. Change Order No. 4 (I t em No . 59) adds the sum of $1,195 to the contract for the extra work described in the change order. Change Order No. 5 (Item No. 60) adds the sum of $5,694 to the contract price to reflect quantities of materia l actually installed on a unit price basis as compared with tl:e quantities originally estimated . Change Order No . 6 (Item No . 61) grant s an extension of time of 81 days for the reasons described in the change order. Item No. 62 is the custom- ary resolution accepting the work as complete and a uthorizing filing of a Notice of Completion. No. 63 -CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO CONTRACT NO. 7-6-4: This contract, the Red Hill Int e rc eptor, Reac h es 6, 7, and 8, is prog ressing rapidly. The contractor has r equested that he be allowed to install, at no additional cost to the District, 42 inch diameter reinfo rced concrete pipe in lieu of the 39 inch diameter vitrified clay pipe orig ina lly specified. Since the change obviously will increase the cap acity of the sewer, we recommend adoption of the change order calling for this s ub stitution . -6- t -..; No. 64 -COLLECTION OF INCREASED CONNECTION FEES FOR MULTIPLE DWELLINGS: The General Counsel has recommended, by means of a letter included with the agenda material, that the staff be directed not to collect the increased fees provided for in Ordinance 714 which will b.e repealed by Ordinance 715 at the May meeting. The motion appearing on the agenda carries out this recommendation. No. 65 -ACCEPTANCE OF EASDIBNTS: Four separate easements for a local tract sewer have been offered to the District at no cost . We recom- mend acceptance of these easements as described in the motion appearing on the agenda. -7- Fred A. Harper General Manag er EXCERPTS FR OM THE MINU TES OF TH E REGU LAR J OI NT MEET I NG OF THE i30P.RDS OF DIP.EC TORS OF COUNTY SP.NITATION DISTRICTS HOS . l, 2 , 3, 5 , 6, 7 an::l 11, OF OF.1;NGS COUNTY , CALIFORNIA A regu l ar join t meeting of t h e Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Dis t ricts Nos . 1, 2 , 3 , 5, 6 , 7, an d 1 1 , of Orange County, California, was held at t h e hou r of 7 :30 p .m., Apri l 12 , 19 72 , 1 0844 Ellis Avenue , Fountai n Va l ley, Ca l i f ornia . The Chairman of t h e Join t A~m i n ~strative Organiz a tion ca lled the meeting to orde r at 7:30 p.c . The r o ll was called a n d the Sec r etary r eporte~ a quorum pre s ent for each Di strict 's Bo arrl . * * * * * * * * * This 12th day of April, 1972 , Distr ict 6 Adjou rnment at 7 :30 p .m., in the District 's office at 1 0844 El lis Avenue , Fountain Va l ley , Ca l ifornia, bei n g the time and p l ace for the Reg ul ar Joint Meeting of County Sani tation Districts Nos . 1, 2 , 3 , 5 , 6, 7 and 1 1 , of Orange Co u n t y , Ca l iforni a , and there not being a quorum p r esent of the Board of District No . 6 , the meet i ng of said District was thereupon ad j ourned by the Secretar y to the 17th day of Apri l, 1 9 7 2 , at 5 :00 p .m. STATE OF CALIFORNIAl SS , COUNTY OF OR ANGE I, J . WAYNE SYL VESTER , Se c ret a ry of each of the Boar0 s of Directors of County Sanitation Distri:ts Nos . 1, 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , an d 11 , of Orange County , California , •1 0 hereby certify that the above an d forego i ng to be f u ll , true an 0 correct copy of minute entries on meeting of sa ir] Board s of Di rec tors on t he 12th day o f April 19 72 ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I h a v e h ereun to set my hanrl this 12th S -10 7 rl ay of April , 1972 e Boar ~s of Di rectors itat i on Di stricts Nos . 6, 7, an d 11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFQRNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) April 7, 1972 TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. l; 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, AND 11 Gentlemen: The next regular meeti~g of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts nos. l, 2, -3, 5> 6, 7, 8, and 11, of Orange County, California, will be held: Wednesday evening, ~pril 12, 1972 at 7:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California y>creta;ry /' •/ .'; ./ Ten ta ti ve adjournments prior to next regular mee.ting: Executive Committee -6:00 p.m., April 25 Note: District No. 7 will meet in a.n adjoutned regular meeting April 12th at 7: 00 p .m. immediatel;y-preceding joint meeting Note: District No. 3 will meet in a special meeting April 12th at 6:30 p.m. preceding joint meeting SEE ATTACHED MAPS OF DETOUR NECESSARY TO ENTER PLANT NO. 1 (-··· BK:(X)K HU ~'Si 11 . . EUC U D ---2 51. . . . . . . . ' . . ." . . I . ' . . . " ... . . ·: .·.· . . .·. , ~ . . ·~ . . . '::::> . -, -..::.., I • •... r •• ,· ·•· ;\{'* .. · . . . . ..... 1"&- . , . '--.._' .. : .• ~ _.-.._ . . .: -~ 0cv . . . I flL1'5 AVE AD\1lNl5T~J~TlON e.;utLDlN6 --~a~~~--.maaup~ PLANT Ne i N01 TO SCAlC" D ST 1r I' r il ti BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Distiicts of Orange County, California 1()/1\IT v'-'11 't/I P. 0. Box .8127 10844 El lis Av enue Fountain Volley, Cali F., 9270 6 --It. 11=====================================================A==G=E==N=D==A===-====== (1} (2) (3) ( 4) @ ® ( 7) ( 8) ADJOUR NM EN TS POST ED .. V April 12, 1972 -7:30 p.m. COM P & MILEAG E ...... ~. FILES SET UP ......... ~ ... RESO LL:TIONS CERTIFI ED,..V t ETf ERS \'.' P. ITTEN .... .v.<::" .. MINUTES VIR ITTEN ..... V.::::: Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation ·*-6 ~9; Roll Cal 1 1"(ViJ ~\J::rV"'Jvv\ ~pointment O~hairma~o EACH DISTRICT MI NUTES HLED ....... : ........ ~ Consideration of motions approving mi nutes of the following meetings, as ma iled: Di strict 1 ::;:, District 2 =- District 3 :::: District ~ ./ := '~ -----------·- District 7 c. District 11 ALL DISTRICTS March 8, 1972 regular M I s March 8, 1972 regular M /5 March 8, 1972 regular /\''\ ) .:> March 8, .1 972 regular . ,¥1 l 5 March 8, 1972 regular ft\ is March 8 , 1972 regular and March 21 , 1972 ad,journed October 13, 1 971 regu l ar and st.- January 12, 19 72 regular March 8, 1972 regular . fA ) > Report of the Joint Chairman ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Ge0eral Manage r .ICT~ ~ o the~r~l C~el ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committees' written report ~~~ (9) ALL DISTRICTS Consid eration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: Consideration of motion directing the Chairman to arrange an orientation meeting for new Directors in accordance with the indoctrination outline as recommended by t h e Executive Committee Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to request a proposal from Terry and Associates for preparation of the 1972-73 Environmental Impact Statement for treatment plant i mprovements (10) ALL DI STRICTS * * * * * * CONSENT CALENDAR All matters p l aced on the consent calendar are consid ered as not requiring discussion or further explanation a nd unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the con sent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance , there will be no separate discussion of these items . All i tems on the consent calendar will b e enacted by o n e action approving all motions , and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar . Al l items removed from the co nsent cal endar shall be considered separately in the regular order of business . Membe rs of the pub l ic who wish to remove an item from the consent ca lendar shall, up on recognition by the chair , state their name, address and desi g nate by l etter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. Chairman will d eterm i ne if any items are to be dele ted from the consent calendar . Consid erat i on of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically ~~remov ed from sam e . LETIER .~ ... P.A .... (a) Consideration of motion authorizing the General AJc .... TKLR •••• Manager to award printing of standard specifi cat ions ~=-:U.~ ... V to the lowest responsible bidde;r for an amount not e-,.g -.,~ ~ .... ,,:.,. to exceed $ 4 300 . 00 plus tax ·~V')"" (b) ~![~····--·· l E R --····-····· ~~-~--.-~.K~~ ........ .. .···-······:·······re·) FIL~···············- LETTE •••.•••..••••• ~~~-~--------~L~ ........ .. (d) fJL~••••••••••nw·- LfTT \······-- ~:.-:~··= Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 3 , to the plans and specifications for Interplant Influent Interceptor , Job No. I -8 , author iz ing an addition of $1,525 .34 to the contract with Kordick a nd Rados , A Joint Venture . See page "D" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 2 , to the plans and specifications for Pump Station and Addition s to Bypass Fac ilit ies at Pl ant No . 1, Job No . I-7-3 , authorizin g a n add i tion of $1 ,348 .65 to the contract with Hea ly Tib bitts Construction Comp any. See p age "E" Consideration of motion a uthori zing the Director of· Finance to attend all necessary meetings in connection with membership o n the Exe cutive Committee of the . California Association of Sqnitation Agencies; and authorizing payment of expe ns es incurred for attendance at said meetings , -2- (11) AL DISTRIC~ Con ideratiOn~tems de~om con~ cale~ i~ny \ ~) ~STRICTS 1, 2, 5, © 7 & 11_ . ~-¥··· ·eonsideration of motion declaring intent of Districts Nos. fl/\ -TTER ·-··-··----1 ? .::; 6 7 !'.'> n d 1 1 +-o c '"'n s 0 n +o t o Dis tr i ct No • 3 s e v: er in g ti/\ -'Ne .... TKLR ••. ;f ; '20~ac~e' a;~a loc~ ted '""'~dj a~ent to District No. 3 and __ ..i;.\ .........• -......... proposed to be annexed to the City of Long Beach. See page "F" f .f\. )~--... .,. ....... ~· : 13) DISTRICT 3 fV/ Consideration of motion declaring intent of District No. 3 r I) L to enter into a contractual agreement with the City of 0) \ A/c •.•• TKLR .... Long -~each to provide sewerage service for a 20-acre area 'l..A~-of land located adjacent to District No. 3 and proposed ~\rf =:(~:;:::::A :: ::s::::;:d to the City of Long Beach. see page "F" ./ · Consideration of motion to-receive and file certification ~.f\ \ S of the General Manager that he has checked all bills ~\\ appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment (16) (17) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating and Capital Out l ay Revolv ing warrant books for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing payment of claims listed on page "A" ALL DISTRICTS Oth er business and communications, DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion t o receive and file Annual Report submitted by Ha nson, Peterson , Cowles and Sylvester, Certified Public Accountants, for the period ending June 30, 1 971 , previously mailed to Directors by auditors (18) DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "C" (19) DISTRICT 8 Other business and communications, if any (20) DISTRICT 8 . \ ( 21) ~ETTE~~-----s~' FILE ~ 6 C •... ~~ •• ., -................ . '~"-" ... 1-M••········,. \ ( 22) ~ --MS (23) 'V\ \ 5> f ( 2 4) (25) Consideration of motion to adjo urn DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Consideration of motion aut horizin g payment to L. Heitman Equipment Company , Inc. in the amount of $2,838 .00 for utility lo cation in connection wit h construction of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No . 5-19, as requested by Donald Simpson, Districts' consulting design engineer DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Consideration of motion approving suspense f und warrants, if any . See page "B 11 DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion a pprovin g warrants, if any. See page "B" and cornmu\:a tik s ·~ if any DISTRICT 5 Cl !' \ Q Consideration of motion to ad journ o o -3- ( 26) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any See page "C" (27) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications, if any .(28) DISTRICT 6 (29) f;) ........ v(._ \ s LETIE R ············-~\ A/C .... TKt~-~ ~ 'j • !' ···-··········-·····"\" ···-··-·· .. ··········-( 30) ...... s M · '7 7 _.-cl'"' FIL ····<!.·,~ "\ ~~· --~\ ~~ . FILE ....•. v.!...... ( 3 2 ) LE~ER .•• IL'.::. A/C ..•. TKLR ··- (33) (34) (35) c;v ....... ~ LETIER ···-·······- A/C .... l'KLR •••• FILE ...•••••••.••...•• LETIER ···········- A/C ••.. TKLR ·- Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Consideration of Resolution No. 72-45-3, approving Basic Construction, Maintenance and Operating Agreement relative to Knott Interceptor, and rescinding agreement dated October 14, 1 970 .· See page 1lG 11 DISTRICT 3 & 11 Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants, if any. See page 11 B11 DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from City of Hunting ton Beach dated April 7, 1972, requesting annexation of one acre of land in the vicinity of · Warner Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway. See page "H 11 DISTRICT 11 Consideration of Reso l ution No. 72-48-11 authorizing initiation of proceedin g s to annex approximately one acre of territory to the District in the vicinity of Warner Avenue and Pacific Coast Hi g hway, as reque~ted by the City of Huntington Beach (Annexation No. 16 -Huntington Harbour No. 4 Annexation) See page 11 I 11 DI'§TRICT 11 \ _ Co~sideration.~'\ motion app\oving war~ts, if any. See~age ''C"· DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn '!>: 'J Q DISTRICT 2 Consideration of actions re proposed annexation of territory to the District in the vicinity of Anaheim Hills Golf Course and Walnut Canyon ~eservoir (Proposed Annexation No. 6 -Anaheim Hills Annexation No . 1): (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from the City of Anaheim, dated March 6 , 1972, requ esting annexation of 312.35 acres of land, and waiver of fees for area encompassed by golf course and reservoir. See page "J 11 (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Anaheim Hills, Inc., subsidiary of Grant Corpora- tion, dated April 7, 1972, requesting ann exation of 1,0 24.89 acres of land, and waiver of fees for 19.15 acres of existing utility easements . See page 11 K" -4- (36) DISTRICT 2 (Continued) Consideration of m~fi--crpp~~equest of the City of Anaheim for waiver of annexation fees for portion of proposed Anaheim Hills Annexation No . 1 F I L~---------········ encompassed by Anaheim Hills Golf Course and Walnut LEITE ·········-···Canyon Reservoir, excepting therefrom that area of Ale .... LR .... approximately 4 acres comprising the clubhouse and parking lot of said golf course, ~¥ev4&ea-y=i at---~n ···-··-········ ···-·· tFi-e -e-vent -said. ar~ea fGr which fees have been waived . -~ ~ (" ···-···················-requires sewerage service in the future, annexation .:)~-~~'\.C:J fees shall become due aryd paya ~e at the rate then \\q ~ · in-e -f feet. See page ( "1,''r l . .:\. Cii.A _,£ - ~:~I\ LE~--·-:::::::~:::{d) Consideration of moti an· ~:y-i-fl·g-req~t~~0t of Anaheim Al e ---KLR ·-Hills, Inc. for waiver of annexation fees for 19 .1 5 acres -----·-········· ···-of proposed Anaheim Hi lls Annexation No. 1 co/l'sisting . _,,/" ....................... _ of existing utility easements . See page ~'M" ) l ~U -l ~ "-._.,./ l\ . . v :~• .~:0~e) A/C .... KLR _ ...................... - ......................... ,...,. Consideration of me-t-i-&R-&~prov~n~ request of Anaheim Hills, Inc. that annexation fees for 1,024.8 9 acre~ of proposed Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 1 be paid in five equal annual installments on the tax bill, pF-o.¥.ided that Anaheim Hi ll s, Inc . pa-y to the District t'h·€-S.UIJL.O.i' $5 , 000. 00 to defray annual expense of _s -pre-ad-ing-the -a:rmex-at ion fee assessments. See page "M" ---- Q; F~~---------~-cISTR~dcT 2 ..... · f R 1 t · N 72 46 2 . ·th · · tl}:J,a onsi era~ion o eso u ion o. - -, au orizing · LE.'.lJ -·--·-···-j_ni ti ation of proceedings to annex approximately 1, 337. 24 ~~ A/C .... TKLR ····acres of territory to the District ( Propose.d Annexation ~:i~i=ii::~R:C: :naheim Hills Annexatlon No. l) See page "N" \A. \~ Consideration of Resolution No. 7 2 -47-2, authorizing ~~ and directing execution and filing of documents · necessary (~>···-~---·· \ <"::.> for federal grant under 33 USC , L166 Et Seq and State LEITER .............. J\ \ grant under Clean Water Bond Law of. 1970, for Contract A/C .... TKLR .... \' No. 2-14-1, Santa Ana River Interceptor from Reclamation ···-··-··············-· Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue , jointly with the Chino Basin Municipal Water District. See page II Q II (40) \)J-N\\ s ~.,,..;J_-1-i- DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion authorizing staff to advertise notice of public hearing on Environmental Impact Statement in connection with Santa Ana River ;Interceptor , Contract No. 2-14-1 ;;;. 'QJ , -~ ( ,,,.. V) ;;J w u ~ DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-14-1·. See page "P" ( 4·1) . DISTRICT 2 ('J \ ~ Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "B" a if any (43) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn ti'\~ -5- ( 44) 'c;;) .. L. ~--~··/. '\ S I r.,.,-ER ':~!.JL.~l\. \ •... TKLR - •••••••-•••••oooo nH•·- ·················----( 4 5) FI LE ····'····-· LETIER f.S\~~ s A/C .... T KLR ~~ <1.ouoo.0.0.o•••OOO OUO•O HOO• (4 6) FILE ..•.•• ~ .•••••• LE TTER ·······-···~ s A/C .... TKLR .• ~"""' .... _________ ,.._,.. .. _ ........................ __ _ 1®····-~(49) LE~~--~~: ·-·-\ $ ~:.~--~~-l \ (50) . \ s .® (5 2 ) DISTR ICT 3 Considerat io n o f motion to re ce ive, file and accept proposal submitted by Boyle En g ineering , dated April 5, 1972 , for engine e rin g servi ces in connect i on with preparation of plans and specifi cations for the Bo lsa Re lieT Trunk Sewer . Contr act No . 3-17 -1, and the Ci t y o f Westminste r stor m dr a in in Bo l sa Avenue, for a lump sum fee of $20 ,240 , subject to assurance that Westminster will pay share of desi gn cost .See page ~ DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to receive , file and acc ept proposal submitted by Boyle Engineering , dated Ap ri l 4, 1 9 72, for engineering services in c o nnection with preparation of plans a n d specificati ons for the Knott Interceptor, Reach 4, Contract No . 3 -18 , f o r a lump sum fee of $123 ,5 00 . See page "R" DISTRICT 3 Consid e ration of Resolution No . 72 -4 9 -3 to r e c e ive and fil e bid tabulation and recommendation , and awarding contrac t f or Kno tt In terceptor , Reaches 1, 2 a n d 3 , Contract No. 3-17, to J . F . Shea Co ., Inc ., i n the a mo unt of $5,755,4 80 .00 ; and authorizing th e General Manage r to est ablish the effec tive award date . See pages "S " and 11 T 11 DI STRICT 3 Consideration of motion appr ov in g Change Ord e r No . 6 to the plans and specificat i ons f or Beach Relief Trun k Sewer , Reaches 17, 1 8 and 19, Contract No . 3 -16~ authorizing a n addition of $8,250 .00 to the contract with .Merco Construction Engi n e e rs, Inc . See page · r:u" DISTRICT 3 Co nsiderati on of mo tion appro ving Ch ange Order No . 7 to the p lans and spec ifications for Beach Re l ie f Trunk Sew er, Reaches 17, 1 8 and 1 9 , Cont ract No . 3-1 6 , gran ting an ext ension o f time of 77 calendar days to the cont r a ct with Merco Construc tion Engineers , Inc . See pa ge 11 V" DISTRICT 3 Consideration of Resolution No. 72-50-3, accepting Beach Re lief Trunk Sewer , Reaches 17, 1 8 and 1 9 , Contract No . 3-1 6 , a s complet e , aut h orizing exec u t ion o f a Notice of Comp l e tion, and appro ving fina l c lo seout agreement . See page 11 W" DI STRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving wa~rants} if any DISTRI CT 3 Other b us iness a n d communications, if any DISTRICT 3 \ C~' Ii ~ Consideration of motion to adjourn ('/\ ':> V .. I --' (53) DI STRICT 7 ©'\)-.OJ\. Repor t of staff and consu lting eng ineers 6f'J ~ sewerage faciliti e s to s e rve portions of _r Park Ac re s area with the City of Orange, O~o.,i.,~ \0 from the adjourned meeting held March 2 1 "{ . (54) DIST RICT 7 on propo sed th e Orange cont inued u -\ Co n sideration of Resolution No . 72 -51 -7, ordering ann exat io n ~1.:1 C-v /AA of territory to the Distri c t , Me ad Annexation -Annexation ~~v'vv 1 No . 27 to County Sanitation District No . 7 ·. Se e page "X" ar \0 . ~ -6- (55) vv ..... rL ~ LETIER.--~ s A/C .•.. TKLR .... ························cs6) (57) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from the Farrow Development Corporation, dated March 15, 1972, re annexation of a portion of T~nty Sanitation District No. 7; and ~~~o~t~·or report and recommendation. See page i+y-"i:::......-.~~~ ISTRICT S . 1 & 7 onsideration of moti approving Change Order No. 7, to t e plans and specific tions for Sunflower Interceptor, Re ch 1, Contract No. 7 6 -1, authorizin g adjustment of eng ·neer's quantities an a total deduction of $7,~76.00 to e contract with Sull -Miller Contracting Company. See ge "Z" tion of motion appro ing Change Order No. 8, to and specifications r r Sunflower Interc eptor, Reach 1, ntract No. 7-6-1, gr nting an extension of 16 calendar days to the contract with Sul l y -Miller Contracting ompany. See page 'AA'1 (58) DISTRICTS 1 & (59) ~~~ (60) ff\ \s (61) ~\s . (62) ~--····~ '\ LEITER ······--ti\ s A/C .... TKLR ··- (63) ~<:; Consideration o Resolution No. Sunflower Interce tor, Reach 1, complete and autho ·zing execution Completion. See page "BB" DISTRICTS 1 & 7 accepting No . 7-6-1, as otice of Consideratio n of motion approving Chang e .Order No. 4, to the plans and specifications for Sunflower . Interceptor, Reach 2, Contract No. 7-6-2, authorizing an addition of $1,195.00 to the contract with Ernest E . Pestana , Inc. See page "CC" DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 , to the plans and specifications for Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 2, Contract No. 7-6-2, authorizin g adjustment of engineer's quantities and a total addition of $5,694.00 to the contract with Ernest E. Pest.ana, Inc. See page "DD " DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 6, to the plans and specifications for Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 2, Contract No. 7-6-2, granting an extension of 81 calendar days to the contract with Ernest E. Pestana, Inc. See page "EE" DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 72-53-7 accepting _, Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 2, Con"rract NQ. 7-6-2, as complete and authorizing execution of a Notice of i..-- Completion. See page "FF" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 1, to the plans and sp e cifications for Red Hill Interceptor, Reaches 6, 7 and 8, Job No. 7-6-4, authorizing a change from 39" diameter VCP to 42" diameter VCP in the contract with Northern Contractin g Company at no cost to th e District. See page "GG" -7- (64) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion directing that the Districts' \ C: staff and the sewerin g agencies withLn the District "FILE'~·······:·',f ::..> be instructed not to collect any increas ed fees, as ~ _ ~\ provided for under the p rovisions of Ordinance No. 714, c .... R .... ~ in that it is the intent of the Board of Dir ectors to ~~ repeal Ordinance No . 714 and replace it with Ordinance ............. -... No. 715 effective July 1, 1972. See page "HH" ................................. __ ..,.. (65) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of the following resolutions in connection with grants of easement for the "Clover Circle Sewer" to provide service for : the d e velopment in the vicinity of A/c •... TKLR _ Greenwald Lane and Clover Circle , at no cost to the District: \ ' ( 66) ~\S \ (67) f\J \\ s (68) (69) (70.)_ (71) (72) (a) Resolution No. 72 -54-7 -Grant of Easement from Paul M. Wolff and Anne K. Wolff . See page "II" (b) Resolution No . 7 2-55 -7 -Grant of Easement from Frank J. Fundak and Gloria A. Fundak. See page Resolution No . 72-56 -7 -Grant of Easement from Ted G. Hays and Virginia Hays. See page "KK II ( c) (d) Resolution No . 72 -57 -7 -Grant of Easement from Ted G. Hays and Virginia Hays. See page "LL" DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants , if any. See page "C" DI STR ICT 7 Consideration of motion app r oving warrants , if any. See page "C" DIS RIC 7 '\ ~. \.,."' 0th r b iness~11d .... \...mmun~f~s\i\ ~y DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn W i ~. 5 d. DIS ICT 1 ~ Consi eration of1n~on approvi~'"'arrants, if any . Se~ page "B" 16 ~ DISTRICT ~ Other busi~ess~d DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn -8- "JJ" MEE i:., NG ~Ar E __ Jj._ ..... __.1 ...... d-..__-1 .......... ~'--=----T 1 ME 1 ~ a o DISTRICT 1 (HERRIN) •• ··· GRI S ET (CASP~RS) .• ··BATTIN (coco) ....... MILLE R · PORTER V~'"'TRICT 2 mLE~AN) .••. SM ITH ROOT) •...••• CHRISTIE (JACKSON) .••• CLARK) ROBT CUL VER (GOMEZ) ...... FINNELL (GR I SET) ...•. HE RRIN · (HARPER) ....• JUST (CASPER S ). • • • PH I LL I PS (ZU NIGA) •.... S I MS (DUTTO N) •.• •· STEPHENSON (MACHADo) •.•• wEDAA (sCHNIEPP) .•. wINN KROESEN ····HYD E CASPE RS). ···BATT I N WEST~A). ····BERTON ROOT).······ CH R ISTIE (JACKSON).··· CL ARK ) ROBT CULVE R (FONTE).····· DAVIS (MC CRACKEN ). GR EEN (JUST).······ HARP ER (K ANEL) •...• ·HARVE Y !GR I SET).···· HE RR I N LEWIS) .• ·••· HEMEON BARNE S) •.• ·· HOLDEN MC WHINNEY (ZUNIGA).···· SIMS (DUTTON).···· ST EP HE NSON DISTRICT 5 PAR SONS CASPE RS (CROUL). • • • . • HIRTH _tL_ __ .v-___ _ v ___ _ _a_ __ ~---- -~---- _B_ __ -- _.w::::::_ --. -- .. i....----___ _ ~---­ -~---- _i.:::::::::: ---- ~ ---- ~---- ~---- ~-- ~---­ ~---­ ~----~----~---­ ~---­ ~---­ ~---- ~---­ -l....:C---- ~ ---- _w::::::: -----~ ---- ---i..L ---- ---tL"---- ~---­_a_ __ ~-- DISTRICT 6 r~~~~ POR'i"ER _____ _ CASPERS _____ _ (HIRTH) •••••• MC INNIS ____ -- DISTRICT 7 COCO •• )' ..• MI LLER CASPER S ••.• CLARK) HERRIN ) ..•.• GR I SET PORTE R (FISCH~ACH) .• QUIGLEY (1-nRTH) ••••.. ROGERS (. ... EMAN) .••• SM I TH DISTRICT 11 _i,L __ RALPH~ ___ _ ___1L" ----_a_ __ ~----~----_L ___ _ (MC CRACKEN). SHIP LE Y v __ -- (CASPERS) ••.• BA KER ~ __ -- COE N _tL __ -· - DISTRICl.8_ -~ ~-..v ~ (GOLDBERG) ••• BOYD __ ---- CASPERS _____ _ MITCHELL ____ -- D I ST R I CT S I 1 d..t 3, S, Ca '4 R + // JO ir~T BOP.RDS (H ARPER)····· J UST ____ _ (CA SPERS )· ••. BA KER ___ _ (CA SP ERS )···· BAT T I N ___ _ (WES T RA).···· BER TON ___ _ CA S P ER S ___ _ (ROO T)······ ·CHRI STIE ___ _ (JAC KSON)···· CLARK.) ROBT ___ _ (CASPERS)···· CLARK ) RA LPH ___ _ COEN ___ _ CU LVER ___ _ (FO NTE )····· ·DAV I S ___ _ (GOMEZ) •• ··•· FINNELL ___ _ (FI SCHBAC H)· ·Q UIGLEY ___ _ (MC CRAC KEN ) -GREE N ___ _ (HERRIN)···· ·GRISET ___ _ (JUST)······ ·HARP ER ___ _ (KANEL) ······HARVEY ___ _ (LEWIS)····· ·HEMEON ___ _ (GR I S ET )···· ·HERRI N ___ _ (CROU L) · · · • · ·HI RTH ___ _ (HOG ARD) · · · · ·H OLD EN ___ _ (KROE S~N) ····HY DE ___ _ (HIRTH)····· ·MC I NNIS ___ _ MC WHIN NEY ___ _ (coco) ..••.• ·MILLER ---- PARSONS ___ _ (CASPERS)··· ·PH ILLI PS ___ _ POR TER ___ _ (HIRTH)····· ·ROGERS ___ _ (MC CRACl<EN) ·SHIPLEY ___ _ (Z UNIGA)···· ·S I MS ___ _ (HIL EMAN)··· ·S MI TH ___ _ (DUTT ON ) ·····ST EPHEN SON ____ _ (MACHADO) ...• WEDAA ___ _ (SCHNIEPP ) ..• WI NN ___ _ * * * * MITCHELL (GOLD BERG) ••. BOYD OTHER S HARPER BROWN SYLVE S TER LEWIS DUNN CLARKE SIGLER NISSON CRABB BROWN TAYLO R CARLSO N FINSTE R GALLOWA Y HOHE NER HO WARD HUNT KEITi-i BOETTNER LYNCH MADDOX MARTIN SON MURO NEY PIERSALL STEVENS ME ET ING DATE __ 'f.:.._.r_/ 'lr_· 7'""1--____ TI ME Z ', > 0 .. DISTRICT 1 (HERRIN) ••••• GRISET (CASP~RS) •••• BATTIN ?--- (coco) ....... MILLER PORTER DJ<'TRICT 2 ../ -------"------" ----- _fl:_ ---- _./_. ----l R-rtEt'1AN"J-:-· •• SM I TH (ROOT) .••.•••• CHRISTIE (JACKSON) •••• CLARK) ROBT -±::._ ___ _ _ ./_ ---- CULVER -"-___ _ GOMEZ) •••••• FINNELL -"-___ _ GR I SET) •••• • HERRIN (o _.1_ ---- HARPER) ••••• JUST G·,,1 7' -_:-_ CASPERS) •••• PHILLIPS~> ZUNIGA) ••••• SIMS DUTTON) •••• • STEPHENSON _./ ____ _ MACHADO).··· WEDAA _./ ____ _ _ .,_ ---- SCHNIEPP). ··WINN _./ ____ _ DISTRICT 3 (KROESEN). ···HYDE _./ ____ _ (CASPERS).··· BATTIN _.; ____ _ (WESTBA). ····BERTON _./ ____ _ (ROOT) •...•• • CHRISTIE _t/ ____ _ (JACKSON).··· CLARKJ ROBT ~ ___ _ CULVER _../ ______ _ (FONTE).····· DAVIS ~ '1:0>~ --·--- (MC CRACKEN). GREEN _./ ___ -- (JUST).······ HARPER ~ _./ ___ -- (KANEL). ·····HARVEY _.; ___ -- ~GR I SET)····· HERRIN _../ ___ -- LEWIS).····· HEMEON -"-__ -- BARNES)···· • HOLDEN _./ ___ -- MC ~~HI NNEY _-./ ____ _ (ZUNIGA).···· SIMS "fl' (DUTTON) .•••• STEPHENSON / ==== ==== DISTRICT 5 ~AR SQ NS CASPERS v (CROUL) •••••• HIRTH DISTRICT 6 e.Q.liIT_R CASPERS (HIRTH) •••••• MC INNIS >/ ------ __k_ ----,/ ~---­ ~----­-"----- " ------COCO •• ) .••• MILLER CASPERS •••• CLAR k J RA-f:::.P.1;1 -"----- HERRIN) .•••• GR I SET _1 ___ -- PORTER J. _fl::_ __ -- (FI SCHaACH) •• QUIGLEY (HIRTH) •••••• ROGERS (, .EMAN) •••• SMITH ·-.,,,,,,, DISTRICT 11 (MC CRACKEN). SHIPL-EY (CASPERS) •••• BAKER COEN DISTRICT 8 (GOLDBERG) •.• BOYD rnPERS MITCHELL 'I/ ------~ ------./ ------ " ------./ ------~ ./ . ------ __&:___ ---- __k_ ---- DI STRICT S _.-..()14~..&..lJ;:_· _:(.._ __ _ JOINT BOP.FDS (HARPER) ••.•• JUST (CASPERS) •••• BAKER (CASPERS)····BATTIN _L_ __ ./ --r--- (WESTRA) •• ••• BERTON -"'-__ CASPERS _t;.. __ _ ~ROOT).···· ··CHRISTIE -~-__ JACKSON)··· ·CLARK) ROBT ~ __ CASPERS)···· CLARK) RALPH _.; __ _ COEN _, __ _ CULVER ~ , (FONTE)····· ·DAVIS (Lt.' .. :.'··.A (GOMEZ)······ FINNELL. -"-__ (FISCHBACH)· .QUIGLEY _v __ _ (MC CRACKEN) ·GREEN ----7-__ (HERRIN)···· ·GRISET (JUST)·······HARPER (KANEL). ·····HARVEY (LEWIS)······HEMEON (GR I SET)· ····HERRIN ( CROUL) • • • • • ·HIRTH ~HOGARD) ·····HOLDEN KROES~N) ·.···HYDE HIRTH) ······MC INNIS _.,/ __ _ ./ ----' ----_../ __ _ _..,, __ _ ./ --.--I ----' ----MC WHINNEY -"-__ (coco) ...... ·MILLER PARSONS (CASPERS) ····PHILLIPS PORTER (HIRTH)···~· ·ROGERS (MC CRACKEN) ·SHIPLEY (ZUNIGA)···· ··SIMS -~--- 'I/ -----°"---~ -- -"----./ J. ---- " (HILEMAN)··· ·SMITH (DUTTON) ·····STEPHENSON _., __ _ (MACHADO) •••• WEDAA _..,,_· -- ---- (SCHN I EPP) ••• WINN _...,_ -- * * * * MITCHELL (GOLDBERG) ••• BOYD OTHERS HARPER BROWN SYLVESTER LEWIS DUNN CLARKE SIGLER NISSON ·cRABB BROWN TAYLOR CARLSON FINSTER GALLOWAY HOH EN ER HOWARD HUNT KEITH BOETTNER . LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON MURONEY PIERSALL t.~"-· · \1• :-• ~ STEVENS ~. '" t ~ '< ,_'. f:Ro-Q ~'h~~·-,(_:i_(~\ ' ;;_ ;i~-, .. ~-·o. ..... -' (}-~ '. U' l_ '-'l.'t.~-c. . ,.,. .. ./ -"----;;- ~ _L .J v' V' ---r MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Californ ia JOINT BOARDS REGULAR MEET ING Wednesday, April 1 2 , 1 972 7:30 p .m. . Post Office Box 8 12 7 l 0844 Ellis Avenue Fountai n Valley, Ca lif ., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 5 4 0-2910 962-2411 April 7, 1 972 ATT ENTION ALL DIRECTORS : Due to the current construction in Ellis Avenu e in the immediate vicinity of the entranc e to the Administ r ative offic es all incoming traffic is being detoured . A map has been enclosed with the notice of the meeting to direct vehicular traffi c to the Garfield entrance to our treatment facilities . DIST RICT NO . 3 DIRECTORS PLEASE NOTE : Chairman Hyde has called a special mee ting of the Board for 6 :30 p .m., prior to the joint meeting, to consider the p r oposed consolidation of County Sanitation District No. 4 (see discussion under District No. 3 business) and to discuss sewerage o f a 20 acre parce l west of Dist rict No . 3 on Westminste r Avenu e (see Item No . 13). The Board of Director s of ~is trict No . 4 h as been invited to meet joint l y with our Board . DISTRICT NO . 7 DIREC TORS PLEASE NOTE : Th e r e will be an adjourned me eting of the Boa rd at 7 :00 p .m., p rio r to the joint meeting to hold the r equi r ed protest he a ring on Assessment District No . 9 . A separate agenda fo r this meeting is· inc l uded in this mai ling . · * * * * * * * * * * * The fo l lowing i s a brief exp l a n a tion o f the more i mportant n on- r outine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise se lf-exp l a n atory . Warrant lists a r e not attached to t he agenda sinc e· they a re made up immediately preceding the mee ting but will appear in the comp l ete agenda availab l e at the mee ting . * * * * * * * * * * * Joint Boa r ds No. 6 -REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER : The staff will r eport on recent d eve l opments concerning the n ew Federa l water pollution control legis - lation and the r egul ations of the State Wate r Resour ces Control Board r egardipg ocean disposal of wastewater. Nos . 8 and 9 -REPORT OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND ACTIO NS ON COMMITTEE 'S RECOMMENDAT IONS: lhe Comm ittee me t on the eve niqg of Ma rc h 28 with Directors Hirth and Wedaa as guests . A report of the meeting , togethe r with recommendations to the Joint Boards , was mailed on April 4 . I tem No . 9 (a a nd b) is consideration of actions r ecor.miended by the Committ ee to the Joint Boa rds . No. 10 -CONSENT CALENDAR: The following agenda items fall into this category in accordance with the definition established by the Boards : (a) Award of Printing Specificati ons -The engineering department staff has recently revised and updated the standard specifi- cations portion of our plant job specifications .. Since this section is used in all plant specifications without change, it is over-all more economical to print this material than to Xerox it. Accordingly, the· motion appear - ing on the agenda is recommended . (b) Chang__e Order No. 3 to Plant Job ~o. I-8 -This job, the Interplant Influent I nterc ept or, is making rapid progress along Brook.burst Street. During the construction of a transition structure at Plant No . 2 it became obvious that a revision of the plans was needed, as described in the formal cha.nge order included with the · agenda ma terial. The contractor has invoiced the Districts for an additional amount of $1,525 .34 for this extra work on a time and material basis . We recommend adoption of the change order. (c) Change Order No . 2 .to Plant Job No. I-7-3 -This job, Pump Station and Additions to Bypass Facilities at Plant No. 1, is practically complete but since a few items of work remain before operational testing, it cannot be accepted until the May Joint Board meeting . During con- struction two items of work not originally included in the contract were require d, as described in the formal change order included with the agenda material . This ext ra work will add $1, 348. 65 to the cont1·ae:t pri ce . The change order also grants an extension of time of 88 calendar days for the reason shown on the chang e order . (d) Attendance of Di r ector of Finance at California Association of Sanitation A g ~ncies -Thls association, in which the Districts actively participate, has proved to be a very viab l e and valuable organization for representing the interests of sewerage age ncies, particularly in the legislative field at the State l evel. Mr . Sylvester was r ecently elected a Director of the Association and will be a member of its Executive Boar d. Ac cording ly, we recommend that he be given a uthorization to attend meetings and functions of the Association deemed to be of concern to our Districts. Nos . 12 and 13 -SEWERAGE OF AREA WEST OF DISTRICT NO . 3 ON WESTMINSTEH AVENUE : At a recent District No. 3 Board meeting the request of a developer for service through our system for a 20 acre parce l west of the District boundary on Westminster Avenue in Los Angeles County was considered. The staff was then directed to pursue the matter further . A memorandum describing developments on this subject since that time and setting forth the staff 1s recommendations is included in the agenda material. The Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, unde r which the Districts operate., specifies that no District can serve -2- areas outside its boundar ies without the consent of the other six Districts and their approval of the fina n cial arr angemen ts for t h is service . Accordingly, all Dist rict s mus t take action on t his matte r (Item No. 12) as well as Dist rict No . 3 (Item No . 13). Districts Nos. 5 a nd 6 No. 21 -AUTHO RIZING PAY111ENT FOR BACKHOE RENTAL: In order to determine in the field the loc ations of possibly interfering uti l ities in t he construction of the Coast Highway Fo rc e Ma i n , the Di st r ict 's engineer recomme nded that these utili t ies be exposed at 57 different critical loc at i ons . Thi s requi r ed the se rvices of a skilled bacJr.Jloe operator . According ly, we authorized the Heitman Eq uipment Company, Inc ., t he firm submitting the lowest hourl y rate for a backhoe and operator, to proce ed with the work . The Company's f ina l invoice ($2 ,838) exceeds the staff's authorization without Board approval . The action appearing o n the agenda in this connec tion is accordingly recommended . Districts Nos. 3 and 11 No . 29 -NEW AGREEMENT FOR CO NSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF KNOT'I' I NTER - CEPTOR: The two Districts entered into a n agreement i n Octobe r, 1970, providing that District i'To . 3 will construc t and operate that por t ion of the Knott Inte rceptor which will be jointly own ed . Du ring the prepara tion of an app lic ation for a Fede r a l and State grant on this project it was learned that this agreement is deficient f or grant purpos es since it does not spe cif ic a lly p :r ovide fo r sharing bet ween the Districts o f grant funds . According l y , we recommend that the r esolution included with the agenda material be adopted, which wi ll rescind t h e o l d agr eeme nt a."1d adopt a new one with t hi s provision included . District No . 11 No . 3 1 -AP PROVAL OF ANNEXATION NO . 16: Th e small parcel on which the former Sunset Beach Sanitary District treatme nt plant was located and on which wi l l be constructed a n ew City of Huntin gton Beach fire station is being annexed to the City and will require annexat ion to t he District to obtain sewer service . The s taff has checked the annexa- tion r equested by the City and f inds it to b e in order and , accordingly, we r ec01mne nd Boa rd authorization to p roceed with the annexation . Our investigation disclosed that the parc e l has been withdrawn from the Sunset Beach Sanitary Dis trict in which it was fo rmerl y included . Distri ct No . 2 No. 36 -CON SI DERATION OF RE QUESTS FOR ANNEXATION TO THE DI STRICT : Included with the agenda material are two such r eques t s , one from the City of Anaheim of app rox i mately 300 acres and t he other from Anaheim Hills, Inc., for approx im ate l y 1025 acres. The City annexat ion r eques t is p roperty for a gol f cour se a nd water reservoir and is surrounded by the proposed Anaheim Hi lls annexation . According l y, the staff reconm1ends that these t·wo annexat ions be combined into one proc eedings . It will be no t ed that the City has requested waiver of p aymen t o f ann exation fees ($369 ·per ac r e ) fo r all but four acres of its annexat ion and -Anaheim Hills, Inc ., has requested a simil ar waiver for 19 .15 acres of l and occupied by three easements . Anaheim -3- Hills, Inc. has also requested that the total annexation fee established be paid by means of ad valorem tax on the l and pro-rated over five years. We have prepared memor a ndums (included in the ag enda material) on these two annexations which goes into greater detail and contain the staff 's recommendations. No. 37 -APPROVAL OF PROCEEDI NGS FOR ANNEXATION: If the Board concurs with the staff's recomme n d ations on the above consol idated anne xation, th e action indicated on the agenda under this item is recommended. No. 38 -RESOLUTION AUTHO RIZING AP PLICATION FOR GRANT FOR SANTA ANA RIVER INTERC EPTOR: The recently concluded a g reement with the Chino Basin Municipal Water Di s trict reg arding use of the Santa Ana River Interceptor a nd Districts 1 tre a tment faciliti e s :tnakes nece~sary a new . application for Federal and State grants . Accordingly, we recommend approval of the resolution included with the agenda material . No. 39 -AUTHO RITY FOR PUB LIC HEARI NGS ON SANTA ANA RIVER I NTERCEPTOR: The James .M. Mont g omery Consul ting En g ine ers, Inc ., employed by the Chino Basin M.unicipal Water District, is nmv completing an environ - mental imp a ct statement for this proj e ct . The Regiona l Water Quality Control Bo a rd staff has r e quested that two public ·he a rings be held on this statement, one in Or ang e County and the second in the upp e r basin . ·we therefore recom."Ilend that the staff .be authorized · to conduct these public hearings. No. 40 -ADDENDUM NO . 1 TO PLANS AND SPECIF I CATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO . 2-14-1: Bids for this proj e ct, Santa Ana Rive r Interceptor Sewer from Reclama tion Plant No . 1 to Katella Avenu e , were to have been opened on April 6 . However, because of the fact that the status of Federal grants on a reimburs a ble basis are now uncertain, t h e s taff issued an addendum postponing the bid d a te to Hay 11. This addendum (copy enclosed with agenda material) also makes one technical change in the sp ecifications and includes the Orang e County F l ood Control District permit for use of that District's property for a portion of the interc eptor . We recommend its adoption . District No . 3 No . (a) (6:30 p.m. Spe cial Meeting notice) CONSOLIDATION WITH DISTRICT NO. l~: This matter has been discussed previously and at the Marc h 8 meeting the staff was directed, after di s cussions with the City of Seal Beach, to arrang e for a joint Board meeting of Districts Nos . 3 and l~ to discuss terms for the consolidation. A letter from the City of Seal Beach on this subject, together with our memorandum is included with the special mee ting notice. No. 44 -ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CONTRACT NO . 3-17-1: This project, the Bolsa Reli e f Trunk Sewer, is proposed to be cons tructed jointly with a City of Westminster storm drain. This matte r was considered at the March 8 Board meeting and the staff directed to obtain a proposal from the District 's eng ine e rs for desig n services . The propos a l is included in the a ge nda material and we recomm end that it -4- be accepted and the eng ineers a u thor ized t o proceed with t h e d es ign after satisfactory assurance tha t the City will pay for its sha re of t h e desig n cost . No . 45 -ENGINEERI NG SERVICES FOR CONTRACT NO. 3-18: This proposed project> Knott Interceptor, Rea.ch 4, is the next planned increme nt of the Knott Interc ep tor system as de s cribed in the District 1 s 1968 Master Plan. When constructed, it will c a rry the Y-.n ott Int e rceptor to the i nter se ction o f Westm inste r Av e nue and Goldenwest Stree t, plus a bra.rich r unning west on We s tminst e r to Edwa rds Stre e t, a tot a l distanc e of approximat e l y 3 miles . We have requested a. p ropos a l from the Dis trict 's eng ine e r for design services for thi s project ·w·hich is included with the agenda mate rial and further describes the proj e ct. I t is recom;. mended that the p roposal be accepted and the engineers authorized to proceed with th e d es i g n . No . 46 -AWA.11.D OF CO NTRACT NO. 3-17 : Bids for this p roject, Knott I n terc eptor , Re ach es 1, 2, a nd 3, were opened o n ~a rch 9 with a total of ten b ids rec eiv ed for this work, estima t ed to cost in exc ess of . $6 millJ.on. As can be se e n from the bid t abulation inc luded with the agend a material, the b i dding was e xce llent fr om the s t a.11dpoint of t h e Districts, seven' p r op os als be ing below the engineer 1 s estima te . It i s imp e r a tive tha t we proc ee d with this p r oject at the earliest possi b l e moment to r e lieve a projected overloa ding of the existing District's system in the n ear futur e . Because of the un- c ertainty a s to the status of Federa l g r a nts on reimb ursable projects , the staff recommend s postp oning design at ing an avraro date until this status c an be possib ly cla rified by congressional a ction . We the re- fore rec ommend the adop tion o f t h e reso lution awarding the contract to the J. F. Shea Comp a ny, of Walnut, the low bidder, with the actual award d a t e to be estab lis hed by the· Genera l Manag e r. Nos . 47, 48 and 49 -COMP I ,E TION AND ACC EP TANCE OF CONTRAC T NO . 3-16: This cont r act , the Beach Bouleva rd Relief Tru nk Sewe r, was complet ed some time a g o but , as described in previous a.g end a reports, accepta.11ce h as been he l d up pending sett l e ment with the contra ctor of his c l aim f o r extra compensation due to stricter requirements for comp a ction being imposed b y the State Division of Hig hwa ys than call ed for in t he contract d ocw11ents . His c l aim for extra compensation in this matter at one time was approximately $30,000 but after negotiations . b etween him , the Gen e ral Counse l and the staff, h e a g reed to a settl e- ment of $7, 500 in l ieu of fi l ing a l aws u it against the District . · This sum, tog ether with an item of extra work for additional paving i n the amount of $750 is provided for in Ch a n g e Order No . 6 attached to the agenda mate rial . Ch a n ge Orde r No. 7 , also as agreed to a s part o f the a bove settlement, g r ants an extension of time to the contract of 77 d a ys. Item No . L~9 is the r esolution approving a fina l c l oseout ag r eeme nt embodying the above settlements and the wa iving · by the contractor of h is right to fi l e furthe r c l aims . This resol ution a l so accepts the work as complete and authorizes the fi ling of a Notice of Completion . -5 - District No . 7 No . 53 -REPORT ON SUBTRUNK SEWER TO SERVE POR'EION OF ORANGE PARK ACRES : An interim report on t his matter was presented at the Marc h 21 adjourned Board meeting and ac t ibn wa s defe r red t o this meeting pending r eceipt of f urther informa tion from the Ci ty of Orange . I f t his i n formation is r eceived before the meet i ng, a f urthe r report ·wi ll be made . No . 54 -ORDERING ANNEXATION NO . 27 : This 120 ac r e annexation has b een p r eviously approved by the Board, sub j ect to a r rangem ent s for payi ng of fees . A note secured by a deed o f trust signed by t h e owners and proponents has now bee n s i ghed and it i s recommended that the annexation be ordered. No . 55 -PROP OSED AJITNEXAT IO N OF TRACT 692 7: Included l·1i th t h e a genda ma t erial is a request for an annexation of a five .acre parcel frontin g on the 1·1est side of Santiag o Boulevard, approximately 330 feet south o f Co llins Avenue . We recommend that the reques t be r eferred t o the s t aff for report and recommendation . Nos . 56, 5G and 58 -'CLOSEOUT OF CONTRACT NO. 7-6-1 : This contract for the Sunfl owe r Interceptor between Plant No. 1 and Raitt Street h as now been satisfactorily completed . Two change orders (inc l uded in the age nda material) are recommended for adoption prior to acceptance . Change Order No . 7 (Item No. 56) deducts the sum o f $7 ,676 f r om the c ont r act as an adjustment in f ina l contract price to r efl ect qua ntities o f material actually instal led on a unit p r ice basis a s compared with the quantities originally estimated . Change Order No . 8 (Item rro . 57) g r a n ts an extension of time of 16 days to the contract for the re a sons s t ated in the fonna l change order . Item No. 58 is the customary reso- luti on accepting t he job as complete and ordering fili ng of a Noti c e of Completion. Nos . 59 , 60 , 61, a n d 62 -COMP LETION OF CONTRACT NO . 7-6 -2 : Th is c ontract for the Sunfl owe r Interceptor f r om Raitt Street t o Ma i n Street has now been satisfactorily comp l eted . Prior to acceptance t hre e c hang e orders (included in agenda material) are recommended fo r adoption . Change Order No . 4 (Item No . 59) adds the sum of $1 ,195 to the con tract for the ext ra wo r k described i n the c hange order . Chang e Order No . 5 (Item No . 60) adds t he sum of $5,694 to' t h e contrac t pric e t o r e flect q u antities ·of materia l actually install ed· on a un it price · ba s is as compared with t:te quant ities o r iginally estimated . Ch ange Or der No . 6 (Item No . 61 ) grants an extension of time of 81 days fo r the reasons desc r ibed in the change order . I tem No . 62 is the ·custom- a r y resol ution accepting the wo r k as complete and a u thorizing fi l ing o f a Notice o f Completion. · No . 63 -CH.ANGE ORDER NO . 1 TO CONTRAC T NO . 7 -6-4 : Thi s con trac t , the Red Hi ll Int e r ceptor , Reac h es 6, 7, and 8, is p r og r essing rapidl y. The cont r a ctor has r equested that h e be a llow e d to i nstall, at no additional cost t o the District, 42 inch d i ameter r einforced concrete p i pe in lieu of t he 39 inch diameter vit r ified clay pipe origina lly spec i fied . Si nce the change obviously will increase the capacity of t he sewer, we recommend adoption of the change orde r cal ling for this subs t itution . -6 - No . 64 -COLLECTION OF INCREASED CONNECTION FEES FOR MULTIPLE DWELLINGS : The General Counsel has recommended, by means of a letter included with the a g enda material, that the staff be directed not to collect the increased fees provided for in Ordinance 714 which will b.e repealed by Ordinance 715 at the May meeting. The motion appe _aring on the agenda carries out this recommendation. No . 65 -ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENTS: Four separate easements for a local tract se·wer have been offered to the District at no cost. \'le recom- mend acceptance of these easements as described in the motion appearing on the agenda. -7 - Fred A. Harper General Manager RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOClnliENTS April 12, 1972 -7:30 p.m. i WARRANT NO • 17635 )7 636 ~37 17638 1·7639 17640 17641 17642 17643 17644 17645 17646 17647 17648 17649 11650 17651 17652 17653 17654 17655 17656 17657 17658 17659 17660 17661 17662 17663 17664 17665 17666 17667 17668 17669 17670 17671 17672 17673 17674 17675 17676 17677 17678 17679 17680 17681 17682 17683 17684 17685 . )86 1(587 17688 17689 17690 17691 17692 17693 17694 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF All Bearing Service, Inc., Compressor Parts $ Allied Bolt & Supply Co., Hardware Hilary .Allison, Employee Mileage City of Anaheim, Power The .Anchor Packing Co., Pump Packing Applied Science Laboratories, Lab Supplies Azusa Western Inc., Concrete Bank of America, Bond & Coupon Collection Bassett Office Furniture Co., Office Equipment J. Baurnhoefener & Sons., Inc., Equipment Rental Beacon Auto Parts, Inc~, Truck Parts Bearing Specialty Co., Bearings Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair Bessen & .Associates, Pump Parts A. Biederman, Inc., Gauges Bristol Park Medical·Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams Buffalo Express Delivery Service,JFreight C_.B. Commercial & Communications, Equipment . Cal Poly Kellogg Unit Foundation, Plastic Pipe Seminar Registration Fee- John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services Brain Chuchua•s, Truck Parts College Lumbe~ Company, Inc., Bldg. Materials & Supplies Consolidated Electric Distr., Electrical Supplies Constructors Supply Co~, Tools Control Specialists, Inc., Compressor Parts F.B. Cook Corp., Welding & Pipe Repair ·Paul A. Cooper, Grit Removal Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Truck Parts Costa Mesa County Water District, Water County Sanitation Dist. No. 2 of L.A. County, Oil Disposal Diane L. Creech, Employee Mileage Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage Curtin Scientific Co., Lab Supplies Daily Pilot, Bid Notice & Employment .Ad Diesel Control Corp., Filters Dominguez Marine & Industrial Supply Co., Valves Ducommun Metals & Supply Co., Pipe Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies & Printing Electric Supplies Distr., Electrical Supplies Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring Engineers Sales Service Co., Inc., Pump Parts Ensign Products Co., Lubricant Enterprise Printing Co., Specification Supplies William H. Fox, Employee Mileage City of Fullerton, Water G.W. Maintenance, Inc., Hardware Garden Grove Lumber & Cement Co., Building Materials General Electric Co., Test Primary Circuits General Electric Supply Co., Electrical Supplies General Telephone Co. Gladman & Wallace, Truck Tires Jules D. Gratiot Co., Inc., Filters Graybar Electric Co., Inc., Electrical Supplies Greiner Scientific Corp., Lab Supplies Hach Chemical Co., Inc., Test Equipment Halprin Supply Co., Hose Hamilton Company, Lab Equipment Repair Harman Pump Co., Pump Parts Hertz Equipment Rental Corp., Equipmen_t Rental & Tools Hewlett Packard, Gas Chromatography Seminar A-1 AMOUNT 393.26 156 .90 22.05 9.32 449.26 84.86 173069 751.25 478.07 890.00 30.02 320.01 158 .90 .427 .38 55.01 37.50 6.37 188.79 85.00 ·124. 50 48.53 643.78 2,887.67 246.08 1, 361. 58 110.75 1,152.00 1,033.74 25.77 150.66 8.40 58.32 484.36 30.28 145.82 18.84 246. 57 377.97 54.83 2,730.00 638.72 115.70 7bo67 49.14 6.92 46.94 133035 625.90 1,545.14 1,705.43 62.90 488.28 599.11 40.67 83.55 58.28 24.20 27.08 336.77 105.00 flARRANT NO. 17695 17696 17697 1 7 f598 ~99 17700 17701 17702 17703 17704 17705 17706 17707 17708 17709 17710 17711 17712 17713 17714 17715 17716 17717 17718 17719 17720 17721 17722 17723 17724 17725 17726 17727 17728 17729 17730 17731 17732 17733 17734 17735 17736 17737 17738 17739 17740 17741 17742 17743 17744 17745 17746 17747 ~ ~48 l,_,49 17750 17751 17752 17753 17754 17755 17756 IN FAVOR OF Hilti Fastening Systems, Hardware $ Paul J. Hogan, :2mployee Mileage Howard Supply Co., Piping Supplies City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Equipment Rental Industrial Water Conditioning, Lab Equipment Rental International Business Machines, Office Supplies International Harvester Co., Truck Parts J & M Service, Pump Parts Johnson Service Company, Pump Parts Kar Products, Inc., Hardware Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Piping~Supplies Kelly Pipe Company, Piping Kenner Drilling, Drilling King Bearing, Inc., B~arings S.P. Kinney Engineers, Inc., Filter Kleen Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware Kressilk Products, Inc., Traveling Water Screens LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Tools & Hardware L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Rental The Lacal Company, Inc., Pump Packing Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Sweeper Parts Larry's Bldg. Materials, Inc., Building Materials· Judy Lee, Employee Mileage Lewis Bros. Battery, Batteries Kris Lindstrom, Employee Mileage Liquid Carbonic Corp., Lab Supplies R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., -Paving Materials Mahl Steel & Bolt Co., Hardware Marine Biological Consultants, Ocean Ecology Research Matheson Scientific, Lab Supplies · Mesa Supply, Engine Parts Mine Safety Appliances Co., Test Equipment Paul Munroe Hydraulics, Inc.,. Pump Parts NCR Systemedia Division, Forms Nalco Chemical Company, Freight Nashua Corp., Reproduction Supplies Nate's Saw & Lawnmower Shop Inc., Saw Sharpening National Chemserach Corp., Solvents National Concrete Sawing In~., Core Drilling Nelson Dunn Inc., Engine Parts Newark Electronics, Electrical Supplies City of Newport Beach, Water . c. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel Retainer & Quarterly Fees · Noland Paper Company, Inc., Reproduction Supplies o.c. Suppliers, Inc., Pipe Supplies ODA Nursery, Shrubbery Oakite Products, Inc., Cleaner. Olander's Welding Shop, Welding City of Orange, Water Orange County Appliance Parts, Control Orange County Radiotelephone Orange County Stamp Co., Rubber Stamp Orange Valve & Fitting Co., Pipe Supplies Oreo Block Co., Inc., Building Materials Pacific Pumping Company, Pump Pacific Telephone Co. John J. Phillips, Employee Mileage Plastic Industries, Inc., Lab Supplies Postmaster The Lee Potter Company, Inc., Maintenance Supplies A-2 AMOUNT 70.98 15.45 . 4, 199. 35 7.42 18.38 40.00 34.02 102.21 43.01 217.28 71.r=.7 1,936.85 246.19 780.00 305.77 1,076.60 104.20 575.88 1,671.26 1,179.48 1,528.27 176.26 . 66.89 21.00 28.14 139 .39 8.40 146.56 351.75 204.42 6,146.34 115.92 149.10 86.36 55.80 64.04 16.10 84.57 14.10 810.86 188.oo 76.04 257.94 9.00 2,562.50 28.98 24.40 14.44 199.82 60.38 46.68 6.61 49.46 28.29 75.71 76.39 . 1, 303.60 380.20 183.30 49.67 500.00 163.39 wARR..ANT NO. 17757 17758 17759 J .... 7 60 ~·61 17762 17763 17764 17765 17766 17767 17768 17769 17770 17771 17772 17773 17774 17775 17776 17777 17778 17779 17780 17781 17782 17783 17784 17785 17786 17787 17788 17789 17790 17791 17792 17793 17794 17795 17796 17797 17798 17799 17800 17801 17802 17803 17804 17805 17806 17807 17808 17809 . 10 ~11 17812 17813 17814 17815 IN FAVOR OF Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage Quikspray, Inc., Spray Equipment Rankin Brothers Mfg~, Ince, Truck Parts The Register, Employment Ad Rucker's Backhoe Rental, Equipment Rental San Bar, Ecological Research Supplies Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Santa Ana Electronics Co., Electrical Supplies Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies Scheu Steel Supply Co., Steel Scientific Glass Apparatus, Lab Supplies City of Seal Beach, Water The Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies A.H. Shipkey, Inc., Truck Tires John Sigler, Employee Mileage Singer-Friden Division, Postage Machine Rental Signal Flash Company, Inc., Signs C.J. Skirvin Tire Service, Truck Repair Smith Bros. Co., Fabricating South Orange Supply, Hardware Southern Calif. Edison Co. Southern Calif. Gas Co. Southern Calif. Water Co. Sparkletts Drinking Water, Bottled Water Speed-E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline Standard Ready Mix Concrete, Cement John W. Stang Corp., Pump Parts Starow Steel, Steel Steverson Bros., Oil Removal Sully Miller Contracting Co., Paving Materials Surveyors Service Co., Survey Supplies & Equip. Repair T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Truck Parts c.o. Thompson Petroleum Co., Kerosene Thorpe Insulation Co., Pipe Insulation Triangel Steel & Supply Co., Steel J.G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Blower Tustin Plumbing & Heating, Lateral Installation Harry Twining, Employee Mileage Union 011 ·Company of Calif., Gasoline United States Helium, Lab Supplies AMOUNT 39.66 254.54 7.83 27.36 90.00 64.85 369.80 79.78 27.07 706.77 35.78 12.29 640.57 236.02 7.95 . 59 .85 29.40 5.00 131.25 14.47 23,358.20 1,.596.66 3.20 189.66 343.66 1,181.35 88.26 83.95 127.05 911.44 51.43 4l~. 26 62 .l~9 110.29 210.38 20.79 237.75 475.00 21.75 20.02 146.48 The University Club, Joint AHSA-WPCF Legislative Conference Expenses, Washing~on, D.C. 160.25 400.41 "16. 76 VWR Scient1fic, Lab Supplies Vaniman Camera, Photo Supplies Virgil's Delivery Service, Inc., Freight John R. Waples R.S., Odor Consultant Warren & Bailey Co., Inc., Tubing H.S. Watson Co., Pump Parts Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts Wilson Engine & Equipment Co., Engine Parts World Travel Bureau, Inc., WPCF, AMSA & CASA Mtg. Travel Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage James Wybenga, Employee Mileage Xerox Corp., Reproduction Service George Yardley Co., Inc., Valves Zep Manufacturing Co., Janitorial Supplies Zodiac Paper Co., Reproduction Supplies Fred A. Earper, Various Mtg. & COD Expenses 1972 CWPCA-NWPCA Conference Committee, Conf. Registration TOTAL JOINT OPERATING $ A-3 13.16 426.00 640.79 248.14 138.03 1,681.21 664.00 186.42 13.50 790.62 342.93 56.81 440.78 226.83 263.50 91,451.26 WARRANT NO. 17816 ~7~~~ i1S19 17820 17821 17822 17823 17824 17825 17826 17827 17828 17829 17830 17831 17832 17833 17834 17835 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF John Carollo Engineers, Engineering -Plant Constr. County of Orange, Compaction Test I-8 Orange Coast Daily Pilot, Bid Notice P2-20 E.T.I. & Kordick, Contractor P2-11-l William P. Ficker, A.I.A., Architect J-13 Gelco Grouting Service, Seal Joint I-7-3 Healy Tibbitts Construction Co., Contractor ·I-7-3 J. Putnam Henck, Contractor P2-17 J.E. Hoagland & W.W. Hoagland, Contractor P2-19 Kordick & Rados, Contractor I-8 B.H. Miller Construction Co., Contr. J-7-2/J-12 LBWS, Inc., Tools Moore & Taber, Foundation Investigation J-13 Motorola, Inc., Two-Way Radios, Spec. E-060 $ AMOUNT 16,152.51 1,062.40 49.48 77,364.oo 4,485.00 338.11 1,213.79 81,517.80 40,766.26 493,704.48 90,309060 211.88 865.40 6,438.60 Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Pipe Testing I-8 Security Title Insurance Co., Easements & Title Sun Electric Corp., Testing Equipment 2,612.50 Report I-8 45.00 Surveyors Service Co., Survey Equipment Twining Labs, Testing P2-11-l, J-12, P2-19 F.T. Ziebarth Company, Inc., Contractor Pl-3-1, Pl-1R-l/P2-1R-l TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVlliG TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF A-4 371.28 447.30 218.50 49,848.oo $ 868, 021.89 $ 9 59, 4 7 3 .15 DISTRICT NO. 2 WARRANT NO. ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND ~·TARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 17837 17837-A 17838 17839 17840 17841 17842 Freed8m Newspapers, Inc., Bid Notice 2-14-1 DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Parker & Son, Inc., Printing Amercoat Suit ACCUMULATED CAPIT.'\L OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF -B:)yle Engineering, Ens;ineeriDg 3-16 Merco Construction Engineers, Inc., Contractor 3-16 DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & li SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Daily Pilot, Bid Notice 3-17 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPER~TING FUND 1-JARRANTS IN FAVOR OF City of New~ort Beach, Connection Collection Fee DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND WARRAN'rS IN FAVOR OF L. Heitman Equipment C:)., Inc., Locate Utilities 5-19 Moore & Taber, Soil Investigation 5-19 -B- $ $ $ $ $ $ $ AMOUNT 168.57 111.47 2,750.00 7,425.00 10,175.00 10,286.47 L~8. 48· 32.00 $ . 2,838. 00 5' 600. -'.)0 $ 8, L~ 38. 00 DISTRICT NO. 7 WARRANT NO. OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT ~ 143 i'T844 l 78L~5 17846 17847 17848 17849 17850 17851 17852 17853 17854 17855 17856 17857 17858 17859 Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services $ Orange City News, Legal Notice AD-9 State Board of Equalization, Mead Annexation Processing Fee State Board of Equalization, Chapman Ave. East Annexation Processing Fee The Tustin News, Legal Notice Ord. 714 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engr. & Survey 7-5R-l CONSTRUCTION FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF $ 237.0J 344.77 90.28 38.65 48.08 7,474.50 A. T. & S. F. Railway Co., Crossing Insp. 7-6-4 Boyle Engineering, Survey 7-6-4 $ 138.56 Colich Construction Co., Contractor 7-6-3 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 7-6-2,7-6-3 & 7-6-f~ Northern Contracting Co., Contractor 7-6-4 Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Pipe Insp. 7-6-3 & 7-6-4 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engr. & Surv·ey 7-2C-l G~rdon S. Moen, Connection Permit Refund DISTRICTS NOS. 1 & 7 SUSPENSE FUND WARRAI'ITS IN FAVOR OF Bsyle Engineering, Engr. & Survey 7-6-1 & 7-6-2 Ernest E. Pestana, Inc., Contractor 7-6-2 Sully Miller Contracting Co., Contractor 7-6-1 -C- 2,171.00 504,708.57 306.01 155,134.57 2,993.75 $ 66 5 , L~ 5 2 . 4 6 $ $ $ $ $ 5,1~51. 00 250.00 5,701.oc 679,386.74 17,290.25 11,360.00 7,710.00 36,360.25 COUNTY SA:HTATIO>i DISTRICTS OF ORA~~GE comffY P. O. Box 8127 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CllAl~GE OIWER C. 0. NO. 3 CONTRACTOR: KORJHCK AND RADOS; A JOINT vmrru1~E DATE A pr_1...,.l-...I-2 .... ,-1-~ ..... J7~1..-, .----- JC''~: INTERPLANT INFLUENT INTERCEPTOR, JOB NO. I-3 --~---------~~-~-~--~--~~---~-~-------------~ Amount of this Change Order (ADD) Nmrn.~.K) $ --------1,525.34 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work arc hereby authorized and as cor:1pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's letter and invoice to the Districts elated flarch 22, 1972. The Contractor was directed to raise the ·top elevation of the transition structure from elevation 7.00 to 9.00· and to raise the top elevations of the Manhole opening on this structure from elevation 8.00 to 9.00. This work was done to provide adequate clearances for the "up-stop" mechanism on thq sluice gates in this structure. Work was accomplished on a time and materials basis for a total of $1,525.34. TOTAL ADB Original Contract Price $ 1,525.34 ========== Prev •. Auth. Changes C.0.#2$ H"'1rd authorization date: April 12, 1972 CAIWLLO AND KEITII M·enda Item #lOb ~~~-~-~~~ This Change (ADD) (ElH~J:) $ ___ 1__.,_s_z_s_._3_4 __ Amended Contract Price S 6,47S,C>36.34 ·. -D- Approved: COUNTY SJ\l'iITATIO?J DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By ~~~~~~~~~~----,C~l~1-1-e~f~E~n-g~1-n_c_e~-r KORDICK AND RADOS, A JOINT VE?'-JTURE All Dis t-:.'ic-r, s . ~ cou:-;~~-1-~1xn i-'~~·~rJ·Jc1~.~ u:: .. ~ .. ~1 :\:t.C'?.-; ('( cn .. ".:;(;E l.~c::_:::·,·i" P. 0. B~J:·~ (;}2'( -· J.Ci(~J:.'; J<L! j_~: f\-.,11;_ i1t1.1..-· Foun'cu.in VaJJ cy ~ Ca:1 "i fo1·nia 9?'(C.1 ?; C • 0. N 0. _____ _2 ________ _ r:oNTHACTOH: .li."(;AI..!.)~_'J1 IB._~~ITJ]3 Q_O~'l~~ti3_UC'L.J.JJlt_l1.Ql.·iJ>ND~-· Di\'l1E: ·_fi_~)rj_J,._2:~~-19~l2___ __ ~ JOB: _t_lJMP ~TkrI.QL:I_ __ & ~fillD_JJ'_I_Ql'}.S j2_Q_£}'I~.!1;3S. . .1~N-lI[:!J.'.J~1J~iL.l\.JJ.Ll~JIT_l{Q-A _ _L,_ JCFLN_Q,__ I--7-3 Amount of th ts change order· (ADD) (D.EXIITG\f~ In accordance with contract provis1ons, the f'olloi·1ing changes in the contract a.nd/or contract work are hereby authorJzed anc1 as compensation therefor, the follm·1inr; adcHtlons to or deduct.ions from the: contra.ct price are hereby appfoved. REFERENCE:. Contractor's letters (ated·Nove~ber 9, November 19, November 24, November 3C, Dec0mbe1· 10, Dece:nber 13-, December 20, Decembe~ 21, December 23, 1971 and Jan 1_iary 5, 1972 ' Districts' letters 0ated December 10, 1971 and January 7, 1972 ADD 1. Sawcut opening at Plant No. 1 Headworks . .· ~· Reroute pov;er system to bypass pump statl)n as directeC by the Engineer EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME •. . For delays due to picketing by striking teamsters and for delays associated with c!1anging bypass pump .system manufacturer.due to extended strike at Fairbanks Morse Co., the Contractor is hereby granted an.extension of contract time .of 88 ADD ADD $ 75.00 11) 273 .65 1~-' 348. 6_2_. calendar days. TOTAL TIME EXTEMSION--88 c=i.lendar days . . -. Arrenda I tern //lOc E-1 · . · All Districts P. 0. EOX 812~( -1084!-t Elli D 1\ VCr!UC Fount a in Vc::.lley, CaJJ.fornia 9~l'(08 CH/\HGE ORrnm C.O. NO.~~-·~-~(_c_c_)n_t~,:i-.n~l~lc_.d~) COHTRJ~CTOR: HE/\.LY 'I'IBBI'J.1TS CONS'rRUC11 ION COMPANY DATE: April 12, 1972 JOB: PU>lP ST~rrTO!J & ADDI~l'ION:S rro BYPASS FACILrrIES 1VI1 PLAWP NO.· l', JOB NO. I-7-: Amount of this change or?er (ADD) (DI~DU.CT) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorj_zed and as compensation therefor, the fo llov.:ing additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. 9ontinued ....... · SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME: Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time extended C.O. #1 Time extended this C.O. Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date ~oard authorization date: A~end.a Item #lOc July 14, 1971 150 calendar days December 11, 1971 37 cale.:ndar days 88 calendar days 275 calendar days April 14, 1972 Original Contract Price ·. Prev. Auth. Changes $ l 42. 478. 'QO $ 9' 856 '83 This Change (ADD)(DEDUCT) $ i,348.Q_s.__ Amended Contract Price $ l 53 '683. 48 E-2 Approved: . COUNTY. SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange Coun~y, California By .. Chief Engi~eer. By_ --·------------·---_....;;--Contractor All District~. I. April 7, 1972 STAFF REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE Coutnv. CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX8127 · 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 RE: REQUEST OF' BEARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR SEWER SERVICE FOR A PIANNED DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY ON WESTMINSTER AVENUE EAST Olt' 'I1HE SAN GABRIEL RIVER At the last meeting of the Board, the staff was instructed to review the request of the Beard Development Company for sewer service for a 20-acre parcel of property located in Los Angeles County but physieally isolated from the Long Beach sewer system between the Hanes Steam Plant Cooling Water Supply Channel and the San Gabriel River. To date, several discussions have been held with repre- sentatives of the company and staff personnel of the City of Long Beach. Enclosed is a letter to the development company :from the Long Beach Assistant· city Manager, expressing their understanding of the discussions. The letter is substantially correct except that Item 1, "The development area would be annexed to the Orange County Sanitation District" is untrue. The property would be a:nnexed to the City of Long Beach and in lieu of an annexation fee the developer wouia remit to the Districts, t0-rough the City of Long Beach, a sum equal to the District's current annexation fee, plus 10%. It appears at this time that if the arrangement described in the letter is satis- factory to the District No. 3 Board of Directors, a contractual arrangement to provide sewerage treatment and disposal servic~s for this -area will be made with the City of Long Beach. The terms as outlined in the letter are comparable t9 the cost-plus-10% arrangements we have made with other agencies outside our Districts. The total anticipated flow from this area can be handled by our facilities without the construction of additional sewers. The Districts will not be responsible for or maintain any re- quired facilities to transport the wastes from the development area to our facilities at Westminster and Seal Beach Boulevards. If it is the intent of the Districts ·to enter into a con- tract with the City of Long Beach to serve this area, sufficient safeguards and clauses will be included in the contract to insure that the area served will pay its fair share of treatment and disposal costs i./hen and if ·higher degrees of ·treatment are required. A~enda Item # 12 & 13 · F-1 Al 1 Dist r j_ c _ts_ . ------·----------·-·· .----·-... --:-· CITY or IJ)~(i Ciry Monoger JOHN R. MANSELL t o n q Beach: Calirornia Mr. James C. Beard Beard Development Company 3911 Birch Street Newport Beach, California 92660 Dear Sir: March 24, 1972 Re: Planned Development Community Westminster Avenue.East of the San Gabriel River .. It is our understanding that your Company proposes construc- tion of 190 units on the 20-acre parcel of property at the subject locati.on, and that the proposed Planned Development will be subdivided in .accordance with the· Subdivision Map Act and the City Subdivision Ordinance . . Since the property is physically iso~ated from the Long Beach sewer system and the Los Angeles County Sanitation . Districts treatment facilities by the Haynes Steam Plant cooling water supply channel and the San Gabriel River, it appears feasible and desirable to serve the development with a sewer systen discharging to Orange County Sanitation District sanitary sewer facilities. This matter has been discussed with Mr. Frederick Harper, General Manager> Orange County Sanitation Districts, and · he has informed the City Engineer that his Board of Direc- tors has given him tentative approval to negotiate the terms of an agreement whereby waste generated by the development would be accepted by the Orange County Sanita- tion Districts. As a policy, they do business only with governmental agencies, and the formal procedures for serving and financing the cost of service would, therefore, .involve an arrangement whereby either the City of Long Beach, or the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts would have to enter into a formal agreement with the Orange County.Sanitation Districts for the necessary service. Essentially, the agreement would include pr.ovisions whereby: ·- 90802 :L,L 12 OJ. 13. F-2 All Districts Agenda I terns ., o / / ,/'. ;/ ~ Mr; James C. Beard March 24, 1972 Page No. 2 l~ The development area would be annexed to the Orange County Sanitation Districtsa The annexa- . tion fee would. be approximately $600 per acre, plus a 10% surcharge by the Districts for handling. 2. The payment of an annual charge to the Orange County Sanitation Districts would be made as an in lieu tax. This annual charge ·would be equal to the tax rate in the District adjoining the development, plus a 10% surcharge by the District for handling. This total charge would be based.on a 25%-of- market-value assessment. 3. Under the terms of the agreement the City, or the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, would be obligated to pay this charge on an annual basis to the Orange County Sanitation Districts. The City Manager would recommend such an agreement to the Long Beach City Council, contingent upon the City first ·consumating an agreement, with the developer and the operating corporation for the Planned Development, whereby the developer or the corporation would obligate itself for the annexation fee and for the annual chargeG Provisions (acceptable to the City) reflecting these obliga~ ·tions would, of course, have to be incorporated in the Planned Development Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of Record, Articles of-Incorporation and Bylaws:.. . · . RCC:JEMcG:Ebs . . ·:.:-· ;... : ·: .· . A~enda Ttem #1? & 13 Very truly yours, .JOHN R. M.A..NSELL) CITY MANAGER By F-3 ~c:~~ Robert C. Creighton Assistant City Manager ·. RECEIVED M.l\R 2 8 :972 RESOLUTION NO. 72-45-3 APPROVING INTER-DISTRICT BASIC CONSTRUCTION~ MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING AGREEMENT RE KNOTT INTERCEPTOR A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 3 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF BASIC CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING AGREEMENT RE CONSTRUCTION OF KNOTT INTERCEPTORt AND RESCINDING AGREEMENT DATED OCTOBErt 14, 1970 OCTOBER 14, 1970 * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement entitled "Basic Construction, Maintenance and Operating Agreement, County .. Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11", dated April 12, 1972, relative to construction of the Knott Interceptor, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That the-Chairman and Secretary of Districts Nos. 3 and 11, a~e hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Boards of Directors; and, Section 3. That certain agreement entitled ff Basin Construction, Operation and Maintenance Agreement, Cov.nty Sani ta ti.on Districts Nos. 3 & 11", dated October 14, 1970, is hereby rescinded and made of no further effect. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 1972. /.genda Item #29 -G-Districts 3 &_ll r ....... -.· I ,..~·-· . r'\·: ') . / ,:....; i &4 ... l...A.. -.. . _.,.,~· MA YOH Cit'~l c/ ------------------------~---..__..... ____________ _ P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA S254a Ap:r;il 7, 1972 DOYLE MILLER Administr~tive Officer EH<ANIJE;H D. Ct.~ fL~ Assist.:i:-:t Administrator DON P. 80i\:FA Cit·( Attorn.:-;· WARREN G. HALL Tre:.surer George C ~.k(;r:;.·l..en PAUL C. JO'.\JES COUNCILMEN Jerry A. ~""tn·~y Ted W. Bartlltt Alvin M. CoQr Norma Crand·"i Gibbs Jad:. Green Donald D. ShiP'•'Y Directors, Orange County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California, 92708 Attention: Fred Harper, General Manager Gentlemen: _ It is requested that you proceed with the annexation of a piece of prop2rty on the north side of Warner Avenue a few hundred feet east of Pacific Coast Highway, which is approximately one acre in size. This piece of property has recently been acquired and is owned by the City of Huntington Beach, and consists of. that property on which the Sunset Beach Sanitary District Disposal rlant was located. The city has aiready filed annexation proceedings on the property for their purposes. Maps and legal descriptions bave been supplied by us to your District Engineering Department, and we feel that it is CitY Clt:rk logical ~hat it should be brought into Sanitation District #11. Sincerely yours, G~-6e~ Paul C. Jo~ . City Clerk PCJ:cb J AM ES n. I.'! H f: F. I . C R Director of P •• :.1 1~ '.'.orks FRANK t:. ARGllCLLO . F1naricf' Dare::,,,· EARLE ROBITAILLE Police Chief RAYMOND PlCARO Fire Ch:ef Agenda Item #31 V INCE NT G. r..1o 0 RH 0 USC Di'r;;:c~or H.:irbO'>. Bt>a.:~1c~ & [)e.·eJop"!· .. ~--t -H·- OLLIN C. CLEVE'LAND S1.:1ildic'g L1 1r«.:tor WALTER -.-, . JOHNSON L•hr:>rv C•rector •<ENNETH ~'-REY~iOLD5 Pl.Jnning Direct0: N 0 RM AN L. l.V 0 RT t-~ V A<>c~c.1t1on ~Park~ C;i .. :·ior District 11 RESOLUTION NO. 72-48-1 INITIATING PROCEEDINGS-ANNEXATION NO. 16 -HUNTING'TON HARBOUR AI'EfEXATION NO. 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 16 -HUNTINGTON HARBOUR ANNEXATION NO. 4) * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directois of County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: That an application for annexation of territory to itself be made to the Local Agency ·Formation Commission as follows: Section 1. That this proposal is made pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California; and, Section 2. That this application is for the purpose of annexing approximately one acre, as requested by the City of Huntington Beach, owners of s~1id property; and, Section 3. That the territory to be annexed in uninhabited; and, Section 4. T'hat the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 16 - Huntington Harbour Annexation No. 4", the boundaries of which are more particul~rly described and delineated on Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by reference made a part of t~is resolution; and, Section 5. That provisions for fees require~ to be paid as a condition of the annexation must be satisfied prior to completion of annexation proceedings; and, Section 6. That request is hereby made that such proceedings as required by law be taken to complete this annexation. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 19'72. Agenda Item #32 -I-District 11 CITY OF ANAHEI:iwl, CALIFORNIA . Office of City ~.1anager March 6, 1972 Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District #2 108li4 Ell is Avenue Fountain Valley, California Gentlemen: The City of Anaheim desires to annex to Orange County Sanitation District #2 the property described in the enclosed legal descriptions. The legals. describe the City 1 s Anaheim Hills Golf Course and Walnut Canyon Reservoir comprising about 300 acres of the fonner Nahl Ranch. With the exception of the club house on the golf course, this land will not need sewer service. Therefore, we request conside~ation of the Board of Directors that annexation fees be waived with the exception of the club house and parking lot. This· area is approximately 4 acres. The City of Anaheim is endeavoring to create a green belt area in this portion of Santa Ana Canyon. If these areas are to be preserved, government agencies should cooperate so that undue financial burdens are not placed on the taxpayers. KAM:jr P. 0. Box 3222, Anaheim, CaEfon~a 92803 Agenda Item #36a -J-District 2 April 3, 1972 Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District Number Two 10844 Ellis Avenue Post Of £ice Box 8127 Fountain Valley$ California 92708 Attention: Mr. Fred Harper General Manager Subject: Request For Annexation Into Sanitation District Number.2 Gentleinen: On behalf of Anaheim Hills Inc., and Texaco Ventures, Inc4, I respectfully submit to you this request for annexation into Sanitation District Number TW'o for 102!•. 89 acres of land as described in the map and legal description attached. Also, enclosed is a check in the amount of $325 to cover the orig- inal application fee. Anaheim Hills is presently developing on part of the former Nahl Ranch. During this first phase of annexation, we are requesting . annexation into the district for that portion of the Anaheim Hills project for which more specific plans of development are now being prepared. I would like to draw your attention to the fact that within the annexation area there presently exists three easements which prevent any development from occurring on these three areas. We therefore, request that the acre fee for these un- developable easements be waived although they will be enclosed in the total annexation area. These easements are as follows: Four Con1ers Pipelinet Me- tropolitan Water District and Southern California Edison. This amounts to a total of 19.15 acres. We understand that the present annexation fee per acre into Sanitation District Number Two is $369. Because of the large area of land requested in this annex- ation, we respectfully request another payment method of these fees. We have discussed this matter with members of your staff and have· been advised that we may proceed by placing our total amount of fees on o.ur taxes and prorate them over a five year period of time in five equal encrements. 1665 SOUTH BROOKHURST. ANAHEIM .. CALIFOR:JIA 92804. TELEPHONE (71-'t) 530-7960 ~~enda Item #36b K-1 District 2 Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District Number 'l'wo -2- We look forward to worl:ing very closely with you on this annexation. We know that it will enhance not only the development.of this specific area, but will assist the Sanitation District by incr~asing your total assessable land inven~ tory. If there is any additional information we may be able to provide for you, we will certainly do so as soon as possible. \µ;Q:\~ William J. S~c President WJS:lm Agenda Item #36b K-2 District 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 April 7, 19'(2 . STAFF REPORT (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 RE: REQUEST OF 'I'HE CITY OF ANAHEIM TO ANNEX APPROXIMATELY 300 ACRES DESCHIBED AS THE ANAHEIM HILLS GOLF COURSE AND WALNUT CANYON RESERVOIR TO SANITATION DIS'l1 RICT NO" 2 -:--Letter Dated March 6, 1972 The District 1 s staff has had several meetings with representatives of the Department of Public Horks, City of Anaheim, concerning the City's plans to develop the Anaheim Hills Golf Courseo They have requested that approximately 300 acres of City-owned land be ~nnexed to the District; however, only 4 acres (site of th~ clubhouse and the adjoining parking lot) will require sewer service. The City staff has suggested that the annexation fee for this annexation be applicable only to the 4 acre~ which will require sewer service. Although there is no District precedent to permit the waiving of annexation fees, it would appear that in the case of publicly m·med land not requ:l.rlng sewer serv:Lce, a waiver would not be inconsistent with the District 1 s policy. The other alternatives considered bi· the District 1 s staff were: (1) Require all fees to be paid; however thj_s would place an unreasonable burden on the taxpayers of the City when no benefit is derived. (2.) Not include the unsewered portion of the City-ovmed property in the annexation, but this would create endless problems for the Tax Assessor, in that, a special tax code area would have to be established for the excluded property. It would be an islarid within our District even though the City-owned land ·is exempt from taxes . . , .The staff therefore recomnends that the property be annexed as requested by the City of Anaheim, that is, annexation fees Agenda Item 36c L-1 District 2 i. be· waived for the des:lgnated unsewered portion of the proposed annexation area_., provided, however,, that at such time as any of the af'oresaid undc!Vel.oped 1and requires sewer service, that portion to be developed be subject to a District charge equal t·o the then-applica.ble Distrj_ct annexq,tion f'eesc . ' Agenda Item 36c L-2 . District 2 i. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE April 'l, 1972 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 p14) 962-2411 STAFF' REPOR'I 1 Re: REQUEST OF ANAHEIM HILLS, INC., AND TEXACO VENTURES, INC., li'OR ANNEXA'l1ION '1 10 DISTRICT NO. 2 ~('he enclosed letter dated April 3, 1972, from Anaheim Hills, Inc., requests annexatJon of approximately 1025 acres to the District, with the following conditions or exceptions: (1) That the acreage annexation fee be waived for utility easements totaling approx- imately 19 acres. (2) That the annexation fee be collected through a special tax on the land and improve- ments over a five-year period of time. rrhe staff has held discussions with representatives of Anaheim Hills, Inc., and staff members of the City of Anaheim concerning the proposed development of the area. The densities anticipated by the City for the area are substantially consistent with the District's Master Plan. The Dist'rict's staff has the following reconunendations: (1) Deny the request that the annexation fee for the undevelopable easements be waived. rrhis recommendation for denial is made on the basis that if the fee for easements is to be waived, then the fees for all other undevelop- able areas such as streets, hillsides, etc., should also be waived. If this should occur, sufficient funds would not be generated to finance the needed facilities. (2) Approve the request that the 'annexation fees be collected through taxes over·a five-year period. This arrangement appears equitable to ·both ·the District and the property owner since the developers, Anaheim Hills, Inc., will be requiring sewer service. for the annexed area in phases. The $390,000 annexation fee will be collected through a special ~ssessment against the land and improve- ments within the annexed area. Agenda Item #36d & e M-1 District 2 (3) If Item No& 2 above is acceptable to the Board of Directors, it is recommended that the developer be required to pay to the District prior to annexation ··the sum of $5,000 to defray the annual expense to the District to determine for the County rrax Collector the· swns assessable to the various owners \'li thin the area for which the annexat1on fee has been deferred. Agenda Item #36d & e M-2 District 2 RESOLUTION NO. 72-46-2 ANNEXATION NO. 6 -ANAHEIM HILLS ANNEXATION NO. 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT ( ANNEXATION NO. 6 -ANAHEIM HILLS ANNEXATION NO. 1 ) * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the City of Anaheim has requested annexation of approximately 312.35 acres of territory to County Sanitation District No. 2 by means of a letter dated March 6, 1972, received and filed by the Board of Directors on April 12, 1972; and, WHEREAS, as Anaheim Hills, Inc. and Texaco Ventures, Inc. have requested annexation of approximately 1,024.89 acres of territory to County Sanitation District No. 2 by means of a letter dated April 3, 1972, received and filed by the Board of Directors on April 12, 1972. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, does resolve, determine and order: That an application for annexation of territory to itself be made to the Local Agency Formation Commission as follows: Section 1. That this proposal is made pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California; and, Section 2. That this application is for the purpose of annexing 1,337.24 acres as requested by the owners of said property; and, Section 3. That the territory to be annexed in uninhabited; and, Section 4. That said territory requested to be annexed by the City of Anaheim and Anaheim Hills, Inc., and Texaco Ventures, Inc. can be most expeditiously annexed by combining into one proceeding to be designated nAnnexation No. 6 -A..vi·a.heim Hills Annexat.ion No. 1, the Agenda Item #37 N-1 District 2 boundaries of which are mere particularly described and delineated on Exh.Lbi t "A" and Exhibit "Bi:, attached hereto 8.J.Y).d by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 5. That provisions for fees required to be paid as a condition of the annexation must be satisfied prior to .completion of annexation proceedings;_and, Section 6. That request is hereby made that such proceedings as required by law be taken to complete this annexation. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April ~2, 1972. Agenda Item #37 N-2 District 2 RESOLUTION NO. 72-47-2 FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS -SANTA .P.NA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SE"vTER (From Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTilIG EXECUTION AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL GRANT UNDER 33 USC, 466 ET SEQ. AND STATE GR.Ai'\fr UNDER CLEAN WATER BOND LAW OF 1970 * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors :of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT: Section 1. An Act of Congress kno~m as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 use, 466 et .seq.) provides for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 2. The State Clean Water Bond Law of 1970 authorizes the State Water Resources Control Board to enter into contracts with public agencies for State grants for construction of sewage treatment works in the amount of twenty-five percent (25%) of the estimated eligible total project cost. Section 3. County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5, of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other local collection sewering agencies. Section 4. County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, has heretofore entered into an agreement with Chino Basin Municipal Water District, whereby the two said.Districts will share in the cost of the construction of certain joint interceptor facilities as said facilities and cost shares are set forth in said agreement. Said agreement also provides that this District will construct and operate said facilities and thereby is deemed to be the "contractj_ng Agency" for the joint project as set forth in Title 23 of the California I Administrative Code. Agenda Item #38 0-1 District 2 Section 5. The General Manager is hereby authorized to prepare, sign and submit, in behalf of County Sanitation District No. 2, and the Chino Basin Municipal Water District, any or all documents necessary to. apply for and accept a construction grant under said Act of Congress and said Clean Water Bond Law of 1970 for a joi_nt project generally described as: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER (From Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue) I Agenda Item #38 0-2 District 2 ADIJEHDlJI.I NO c 1 TO SPEC IP I CATIONS A~m PLANS FOR SANTA ANA RIVER INTEI~CEPTOR SE\VER A. G!:HERAL PROVISIO~~S CONTPJ\CT NO. 2-14-1 .. .. Page GP-1, Notice Inviting Bids (Publication), change the first paragraph to read as follows: Sealed proposals will be received at the office of the Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 2 at 10844 Eilis Avenue (lilailing address: P. O. l3ox 8127), Fountain Valley, California, 92703, on or before the 11th day of ;.1ay, 1972, at 11 : 0 0 a . n . , at "'hi ch t i 1:1 c they w i lll) e pub 1 i c 1 y open e u and read in the office of the Board of Directors at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California, ••• B. PROPOSAL AND BO:,m FORl-IS Bidder's attention is <lirecte<l to Section 102 of the DETAILED SPECIF !CAT Ilt~S which states that al 1 bidders sh al 1 subni t bids on all propos,1ls. Failure to submit bids on all t!1rcc al tcr- na tes raay cause rejection of the bid. C. STANDARD SPE~:IFICATIO:JS Sect.ion 21 -Reinforced Concrete· Pipe Sewers Paragraph 21 -1 General The second P9-Tagraph on Page 1 is revised as follows: The pipe D-loatls .sho,·m on the plans are mininum D-loa<ls allowable using ''flush bell" pipe with a rnaxinun trench wi<lth of 24 inches wiJcr than the outside diameter of th c p i p e ~ The Contra c tor r.1 a y us e " f 1 arc d b c 11 " p i p e in lieu of "flush bell" pipe provided thc_D-loac.l strength requirement for "flared bell" pipe is approved by the Engineer. Shoul<l the pipe nanufacturer or Contractor sec econ o r.1 y by r c du c in g th c n ura b er o f var i o u s D -· 1 o a <l in gs ·of pipe required they may do so, provided the above nini- mum requircr.lCnts are met. or exceeded and at no cost to the District. Agenda Item f/40 P-1 District 2 • : I .... ADDENDUM NO. 1 -CONTRACT NO. 2-14-1 Page 2 of 2 D. DE TA I LE n SPEC II; I CAT Im~ S I Section 106 RELATIONS WITH STATE OF CALIPORNIA DIVISIONS OF HIGIIWAYS The last sentence of the third paragraph refers to a copy of the Pen:lit issue<l by the Division of lliglnvays. A copy of the Permit is inclu<lcd with AlJDENJJW-1 ~~O. 1 II Section 107 RELATIONS lOTH THE ORA?\GE cou:~TY fLOOD CONTilOL DI STRICT The first sentence of Paragragh 4 on Page 4 refers to the F 1 o o d Cont r o l n i st r i c t J> c rra it c A copy of the l~ 1 o o d Cont r o 1 Permit is included \dth ADDE?\Irn:-.1 :w. 1. Attention is directed to the following Paragraphs of the Flootl Control Pernit: Paragraph II - Paragraph 0 - Agenda Item #40 All costs incurre<l by the Flood Control Dis.trict for inspection of the permitted work shall be paid by the District and no cost for_ this inspection shall be borne by the Contractor. The Contractor shall be requirecl to prepare and enter into an agreement with the owner and operator of the River View Golf Course. All requircr.1ents and provisions of the agrccr:lCn t l1mst be approved by the Engineer before final execution between the Contractor and ~.fr. Nave 1 J ar;1c s. nay ~1:Le\;1s Deputy Cnicf Engineer . ,, P-2 District 2 -- Page 2 Couniy Sanitation Disf ri ct No. 3 of 0 range County Apri I 5 / 1972 result from cuttin~1 and trenching in Bo Isa Avenue for both facilities at the same i"ime 1 thereby avoiding the inconvenience and public indignation which invariably results from consfTucting two major underground utility structures within a year or two of each other. We will perform the following professional services for the Bolsa Relief Trunk Sewer and the City of Westminster Storm Drain based on one set of construction plans and specifications as ou1·1 ined above. 1 ~ Hold conferences with representotives of the district / City of Westminster, owners or lessees involved, and other public agencies and others, to review cmd discuss all ospccts of the project. 2. Make arrangements for and coordinat.-ion of field surveys, soils investiga- f'ions, and pavement coring. 3. Prepare preliminary engineering sf·udies and design for review and approval. 4. Prepare engineering data for regulatory permit applications that may be required by the Orange County Road Department and the Orange County Flood Centro I District. 5. Prepare defail plans and specifications. 6. Prepare estimates of quantities and costs. 7. Deliver the original tracings of the plans and reproducible plates of the specifications for the district's use in preparing·the necessary number of co pi es for record purposes, distribution to prospective bidders, etc. 8. Assist the district as its agent in securing bids, tabulation and analysis of bid results, and in letting of contract. 9. Check shop and working drawings as may be submitted by the contractor. l 0 o Review laboraf"ory reports on mcitcri als tests and inspection and correlate such reports with the intentions of fhe plans and specifications. BOYLE ENGINEERING Agenda Item #44 Q-2 District 3 • tJ ··~~· l,,1Q?i1~/.//l / /1 /j) /./'L[-··'i. IGI . ~l~,/~-~ .,. 1./ ENGINEERING 0 E f-..1 G I N E E R S 0 A R C H I T E C T S 412 SOUTH LYON STREET SANTA.ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHONE <714) 547-4471 . Apri I 5 I 1 972 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention Mr. Fred A. Harper / General Mcmager ADDRESS. REPLY TO P.O. BOX 178 Pursuon t to Mr. Harper's request in I etter dated March 9, 1972, we are p I eased to submit our proposal for furnishing engineering services for 'the preparation of plans and specifica~ions for the joini· construcf·io.n of the Bolsa Relief Trunk Sewer (Contract No. 3-17-1) and the Cit>' of Westminster storm drain in Bo Isa Avenue. The Bo Isa Relief Trynk Sewer wi II relieve the presently overfoaded condition of the Magnolia Trunk below Bolsa Avenue andwiil utilize capacity to become available in the Knott Interceptor, Reaches 1, 2, and 3, when completed. This facilif-y will consist of 2,700 I .f. of 33-inch VCP sewer, a diversion-junction structure in the Magnolia Trunk, manholes, and appurtenances. The preliminary estimated construction cost is $131,000. The City of Westminster storm drain consists of a portion of Drainage Master Plan Projecf-No. C05 P08 from the intersection of Magnolia Street with Bolsa Avenue to an existing unlined drainage channel souih of Bolsa Avenue and 600 feet east of Newland Street. The storm drain work consists of 48-inch, 66-inch, 72-inch, - and 75-inch RCP conduits with juncf·ion structures and manholes. The preli~inary estimated construction cost of the storm drain is $171 1 000. We propose to prepare one set of pf ans and specifications for both projects. Com- bining f'hese two projects in a single contract wilf reduce engineering expense by utilizing one topographic survey for both projects and wi fl reduce the number of drowing sheets below the number that would be r~quired for two separate contracts. (n addiHon, the combined project should result in lower overall construction cost due to the larger volume of similar work and more efficient utilization of construc- tion labor 1 equipment, and supe'.vision. Additi~:mal benefit to the community will P r." 0 F E ~' 5 I 0 I'~ /'. L ENGINEERING A N D ft RCH ITECTU RAL SERVICE~, Agenda Item #44 Q-1 District 3 Page 3 County Sanitation Dislrict No. 3 of Orange County April 5, 1972 11. Furnish consultation and advice to the district or its agent during construction. 12. Furnish pcri odi c observations of consf"ruction work and progress and provide CJpp:-opria1·e reports to the district. 13. Make a final inspection and reporf-of the completed project with a representative of the distric1· or if-s agent. 14. Prepare record drawings C'as-construcf·ed") when construction work has been comp I eted and accepted by the dis 1Ti ct. Th is sha I I mean the originol tracings of the plans will be modified, if necessary, because of deviations from f-he original vvork. When inspection is carried out by personnel noi" directly employed by the engineer, modifications to the original tracings will be based upon informa- tion supplied to the engineer by the district. The original. tracings, after bein.g modified, will become district property. Mylar copies may be made from the originals for the City of Westminster. We propose to provide the services in items 1 through 14 for a basic fee of $20,240. It is suggesi"ed thaf· payment.be monthly on a percentage-completed basis up to 90 percent at i'ime of de! ivery of plans and specifications, with .100 percent payment when the worl~ is completed and accepted by the district. For purposes of determining the engineering costs to each agency, we suggest a stroight percentage method be used, based on the ratio of individual construction cosi·s for_the sewer and storm drain portions to the total projec1· construction cost •. Using the pre I im inary construction cost es ti mates / the percentages are 43 .4 percent for sewer and 56.6 percent for sf·om1 drain. Therefore, $8,780 ~f the basic fee would be charged to County Sanitation District No. 3 and $11,460 to the City of Westminster. Likewise, costs for field surveys 1 soils investigcif·ions, construction inspection, and other incidental costs should be prorated between the city and district. Field surveys will be required in order to prepare the plans and specifications. These surveys will include taking topography and culture \Vithin the project limits. We propose that all fiel.d surveys necessary for design be performed on a per diem 8 0 Y L E E N G I N E :..: H I N G #'44 Ac7enda Item _ Q-3 District 3 Page 4 County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County ApriJ 5, 1972 bas is at the fo I iowi ng hourly rates: 3-man survey party -$51 • 00 per hour; 2-man survey porty ·-$41 • 00 per hour; and Ii censed surveyor -$21 • 00 per hour. Payment is to be monthly as invoiced. If construction 5f"oking is requested, these rates wiJI remain in effect~ In the event the di~trict requires daily inspection services, we ,propose to provide this service 1 upon written request by the districi, at an hourly rate of $12.00. We propose fhat· all olJtside services required ancl approved by the district, such as soi ls investigations,, pavement coring, and plont inspection for quality control for rnalcriols used on project construction, wi 11 be paid directly by the district upon presentation of a statement of such outside services with the engineer's certification. If we are authorized to proceed wifh this work of-the April 12th ~oard meeting., we con hove plans and specifications ready for odvertising of bicJs in July 1972. BOYLE ENGINEERING a . I. a1 ./)~}' I/ t~7lt~tcl-\._/ 1 c;1z~: -r'-t/:.,, / t/,_: , Conrad Hohencr1 Jr., C. E. 10951 Principal Engineer Id BOYLE ENG!NrERING Agenda. Item #44 Q-4 District 3 ENGINEERS o ARCHITECTS 412 SOUTH LYON STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHONE <714> 547-4471 ADDRESS REPLY TO P.O. BOX 178 Apri I 4, 1972 Board of Di rectors County San Hat ion District No. 3 of Orange County P. 0 .. Box 81 27 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention Mr. Fred A. Harper / Gen era I Manager Gentlemen: Pursuant to Mr. Harper's request, we are pleased 1o submit our proposal for furnishing engineering services for the preparation of plans and specifications for the Knott lntercept·or 1 Reach 4, as set forth in the report entitled, "Master.Plan Trunk Sewer Facilities, June 1968. 11 Th is pro jec1· wi II be the second contract I et for construction of the Knott Interceptor system. The l<nott system and other conneding foci I Hies scheduled in the Master Plan will enable the District to meet wastewater transportation needs past the year 2000. Reach 4 will begin at Newland Streef· and Bolsa Avenue, extend westerly on Balsa to Hoover Street / then northerly on Hoover Street to Main Street, west on Main to Golden West Avenue, north on Golden West to Westminster Avenue, and west on Westminster to Edward Street. At th is point, the recently comp I eted west-side interceptor foci I ity will be connected into the Knott system, thereby relieving a Miller Holder Trunk from this point southerly to Treatment Plant No. 2. Reach 4 is approximately three miles long and v1ill have pipe sizes of 96 inches and 63 inches. The 1·otal estimated cost, including construction, ·engineering, surveying, inspection, legal°, administration, and incide~fal costs, is $4,090,000. We wi II perform the following professional engineering services for the proposed project. · 1. Hold conferences with representatives of the District, property owners or lessees involved, interested cities, and other public agencies and others, to review and discuss ail aspects of the project. PROFESSIONAL E tf G I N E E R I N G AN 0 ~RCHITECTURAL SERVICES Agenda Item .fl45 R-1 District 3 Page 2 County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County Apri I 4, 1972 2. Make arrangements for and coordinate field surVC}'S, soils investiga- tions, and pavement coring. 3. Prepare preliminary engineering sf·udies and design for review and approval. 4. Prepare engineering data for regulatory permit applications that may be required by the city of Westminster, the Orange County Flood Control District, the 0 range County Road Depar1ment, and the State Division of Highways. 5. Assisi· the District· in preparing documenls to obtain federal funds and in processing documeni·s during construcfion in accordance with federal government regulalions. 6. Prepare detailed plans and specifications. 7. Prepare estimates of quantities and costs. 8. Deliver the original tracings of the plans and reproducible plates of the specifications for the District's us·e in preparing the necessary number of copies for record purposes / distribution to prospective bidders, etc. 9. Prepare legal descriptions and plats for right-of-way acquisition as required for facility location and construction. 10. Assist the District in securing bids, in the tabulation and analysis of bid result·s, and in letting of contract. 11 • <;heck shop and working drawings as may be submitted by the contractor. 12. Review laboratory reports on materi a Is tesf"s and i nspecf"i on and correlate such reports with f·he intentions of the plans and specifications. 13. Furnish consultation and advice to the District, or its agent, during construction. · 14. Furnish periodic observations of construction work and progress and provide appropriate reports to the District. BOYLE ENGINEER.NG Agenda Item #45 R-2 District 3 Page 3 County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County Apri I 4, 1972 15. Observe in itia I operation of the project, witnessi rig performance tests as required by the specificaHons and repori'ing same to the District. 16. Make a final inspection and report of the completed project with a representative of the District or its agent. 17. Prepare record drawings (11 os-consfructed 11 ) when construction work has been cornplef·ed and accepted b)' fhe District. This shall mean the original tracings of lhe plans vvill be modified, if necessary, because of deviations from the ori gi na I work. When inspection is carried out by personne I not di re ct I y employed by the cng i neer, modi fi ca I ions to the original tracings will be based upon information supplied to the engineer by the District. The original tracings, after being modified, wi 11 become District property. We propose to provide the services in items 1 through 17 for a basic fee of $123,500. It is suggested that payment be monf-hly on a percentage-completed basis up to 90 per- cent of time of delivery of plans and specifications, with 100 percent payment when the work is comp lcted ond accepted by f·he. District. Field surveys will be required in order to prepare the plans and specifications. These surveys will include taking ~·opography and culture 'Nithin the project limits. We propose that al I .field surveys necessary for design be performed on a per diem basis at the following hourly rates: 3-man survey party -$51 .00 per hour; 2-man survey party -$41.00 per hour; and licensed surveyor -$21.00 per hour. Payment is to be monthly as invoiced. If construction staking is request·ed these rates will remain in effect._ In the event the District requires daily inspection services, we propose to provide this service, upon written request by the DisfTict, at an hourly rate of $12.00. We propose that all outside services required and approved by the District, such as soi ls investigations, pavement coring, and plant inspection for quality control for materi a Is used on project construction, wi II be paid directly by the District upon presentation of a statement of such outside services with the engineer's certification. If w~ arc authorized to proceed with this work at the April 12th board meeting, we can have plans and specifications re~dy for advertising of bids in January 1973. BOYLE ENGINEERING n· /) . l . Ll1YJ0c/{):;Nc._ju r J. z/,. ~ - Conra.d Hohener, Jr., C. E. 10951 Principal Engineer BOYLE ENGINEERING Agenda Jtem #45 R-3 District 3 . ' Engineer's Estimatc:$6,353,995.00 B I D TABULATION S H E E T Date March 9, 1972, 11:00 n.m. Contract For: KNOTT INTERCEPTOJ(, nE/\CHES 1, 2 AND 3 > CONTRACT NO. 3-17 CONTRACTOR 1. J. F. SHEA CO., INC. 655 Brea Canyon Road Walnut, California 91789 2 ~ KOIW ICK-RADOS, (J o·i nt V cnt urc) 112 West ~·laple Avenue i·.Io n r o vi a , Ca 1 if or n i a 91 0 1 6 TOTAL BID $5,755,480.00 S,807,943.00 ··-----------------------------------3 <-SULL )' ·· ~H LLElt CONIRACTING CO. :'ooo East South Street Long Bcachs California 90805 S,942,076.00 ·~ ~-------------------------4 r KRUSE CONSTRUCTION CO. P, O. Box 426 !·iontrose, California 91020 5(. ZARUBICA cm.IPANY 8550 Tujunga Avenue Sun Vall~y, C~lifornia 91352 6. BURDICK CONTRACTORS, INC. · 4 7 0 0 Sant a 1~ e P. Oe Box 99180 San Diego, California 92109 7. JOHN A. ARTUKOVICK. SONS, INC. 16200 S. Atlantic Place Paramount, Califo~·nia 90723 8 0 PERIN I COl~PORAT I ON One tfar it ime Plaza San Francisco, California 94111 9 ~ PA~\IOUNT CONSTIWCTORS, INC. 2501 W. Rosecrans Avenue Compton, California 90224 lO~Andrew Papac & Sons 2030 Santa Anita Avenue So. El Monte, California 91733 Ag end a I tern /i4-6 6,051,324.00 6,243,712.70 6,281,Q83,00 6,321,696.00 6,555,821.00 7,264,620.00. 7,607,260.00 -S-District ...3.. RESOLUTION NO. · APPROVING AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. 3-17, KNOTT INTERCEPTOR A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOo 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACT N04> 3-17; Al\1D AUTHORIZING THE GENERAL MANAGER TO ESTABLISH EFFECTIVE AWARD DATE * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:· Section 1. That the written recommendation this day sub~ mitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering, District's engineer, and concurred in by the Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to J. F. Shea Co., Inc. for KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACT NO. 3-17, and the tabulation of bids and the proposal for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That award of contract to J. F. Shea Co., Inc., in the total amount of $ 5,755,480.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, be approved; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the effective a.ward date for said contract within the time limitations as set forth in the specifications for said. contract; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor; and, Section 5. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, a.nd that a.11 bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 1972. Agenda Item #46 -T-Distr1ct 3 COU1~TY SJ\:JITATIO:~ DISTRICTS OF ORi\~:GE COUUTY P • 0 ~ Box 3 1 2 7 - 1 0 8 .i 4 E 11 i s J\ v c nu e Fount~in Valley, California 92708 Ci (:\NGE OH.DER C.O. !W. 6 ~~~~~~~~~~-DATE April 12, 1972 --------·---- .. T ·~: BEACH RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, REACHES 17, 18 & 19, CONTRACT NO. 3-16 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) Qxm:mu~ $ 8' 250. 00 --------- In accordance with contract provi.sions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract \VOrk arc hereby authorized· and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. .. REFERENCE: Contractor's letter to the District dated Novo 15, 1971 and District's reply dated Deco 23, 1971. State Division of Highways Enroachment Permit No. 771-E-773463, dated Dec. 7, 1971. . ADD 1. The Contractor was directed by representatives of the State Division of Highv1ays to compact the trench backfill in the State Highway to a relative maximum density of 95%. The Contractor performed the compac- tion requirements under protest contending the project requirements stipulated a relative density of only 90%. By mutual consent this disputed contract modi- fication shall be a lump sum addition to the contract in the amount of $7,500. · ADD 2. Contractor was required to repave certain areas i-vhich were paved after contract was awarded. Certain delays which were beyond the control of the Contractor prevented the Contractor to proceed with his .construc- tion schedule ahead of the paving of a commercial shopping center parking lot. ADD TOTAL ADD Original Contract Price 7,500.00 $ __ 1 ___ 5_0_. o_o 8 ·' 250. 00 $ 453,122.15 Prev. Auth. Chan2csC.O.#l,$ 7,522.75 2,3,4 and 5 .. Adds ~--~~--~~~- This Change (ADD)(DEDUCT) $ 8,250.00 ----~--~~----- Amended tontract Price s 468,894.90 ~ Board authorization date: Approved: April 12, 1972· Agenda Item #47 ·-U- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By~--~~~~~--~~~.._.....--.-....~--C hi e-f Engineer MERCO CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERS District 3 cou:;TY s;,:rI'.£'/)Trc:; r~r:~T2r2:-s o~, orc~r~c:·: cou:;TY P. 0. BOX 5rl5 -102:+:~ Ellis l\ vcr~uc Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHl\NGE ORDER C .O. NO ·---~jFINA_L_._)_ CONTRACTOR: MERCO CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERS, INC, DATE: April,12, 1972 TOB: BEACH RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, REACHES 17, t8 AND 19, CONTRACT NO. 3-16 Amourit of this change oider (ADD) (DEDUCT) . $ ---------0- In.accordance with contract pr0vis:ons, the following changes in the cont:cact and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as cor.1pensa tion th2refor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price tlre hereby approved. · REFERENCE: Change Order No. r, 2,·3 and~ 4, Contractor's le.tter to the District dated January 3, 1972._ . .. The Contractor i_s hereby granted an extension of time to accomplish the· extra .work included ~n. Change Order No. 1,. 2, 3 and 4. For Change Order No: 1 Tunneling.under oil lines (including delay) For Change· Order No. 2 Removal of large block of concrete at· Rosecrans (including delay)'· . For Change Order No. 3 , Reconstructing house lateral at Sta. 44+51 · . (including delay) For Ch~nge Order No. 4 Removal· and .rep.la-cement of Manhole No. 4 base at 76+32.60 (including delpy) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION DUE TO EXTRA WORK · ' -The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of time due ~- to inclement weather for the· following ·time periods. October 28~29, 1971 November 12, 1971 December 3, 1971 December·l2-13, 1971 December 22-31, 1971 TOTAL.TIME EXTENSION DUE TO WEATHER The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of time in accordance with the final close out agreement dated April~4, 1972. The total time extension as mutually agreed is 41 days. TOTAL TIME EXTENSION PER .ACHEEMENT Agenda Item #48 V-1 7. ·calendar days 5· calendar day~ 4 calendar days ·4 cq.lendar days 20 calendar.days 2 calendar days 1 calendar days 1 calendar days 2 calendar days 10 calendar days 16 calendar days 41 calendar days District 3 CCffiiTY S.~I.rI'1ATI01r DIST?.ICTS or. OR.!\!TGE COUlITY P. O. BOX 812·7 -1081!.4 ~llis _L), ve~ue Fountain Valley, Califorr.ia 92708 CHANGE ORf.ER CONTRACTOR: MERCO CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERS, INC. C.O. NO. 7 {Continued) DATE: Aorll 12. 1072 JOB: BEACH RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, REACHES 17, 18 AND 19, CONTRACT NO. 3-16 ~ ·~ Amount of this change order (ADD) (PEDUCT) $ --------0- In accordance with contract provisiJns, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or de4uctions from the contract price are hereby approved. Continued •••••• TOTAL TIME EXTENSION 77 calendar days S UMI''1A RY : Original Contract Date . Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date May 27, 1971 180 calendar days November 22, 1971 257 calendar days February 7, 1972 .= Original Contract Price $ 453,122.15 Board au.thor'ization date: April 12, 1972 Agenda Item /148 Prev. Auth. Changes 1,2,3,4, 5 & 6 $ 15,772.75 This Change (ADD) (DEDUC'r) $ -0- Amended Contract Price $ 468, 89l~. 90 V-2 Approved: COUNTY SANITt\TION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Er.gin2cr MERCO CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERS, INC. By ____ ~--------------~--~------ District 3 RESOLUTION NO. 72-50-3 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-16 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-16 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSE- OUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Merco Construction Engineers, Inc., has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for the Beach Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 17, 18 and 19, Contract No. 3-16, on the 7th day of February, 1972; and, Section 2. That by letter, Boyle Engineering, District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said engineers' recommendation, which said recommenda- tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the. Beach Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 17, 18 and 19, Contract .No. 3-16, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 27th day of May, 1971; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work therefor; and, Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Merco Construction Engineers, Inc., providing for a change in the final Contract ...,,_, price to $468, 894. 90 and granting an extension of time of 77 days; and, >a._ __ .• ,"') i '"4-,_,, Section· 7. That the Cha~rman and Secretary.of the Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 1972. -v~·-District 3 RESOLUTION NO. 72-51-7 ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE Dj_STRICT l·lEAD A~frfEZATIOlT - ANNEXATIOiJ TW. 27 TO COUHTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, 'ORDER[ NG ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (MEAD ANNEXATION -ANNEXATION NO. 27 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7) * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That, pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Corrunission for annexation of said territory to County Sanitation District No. 7, by means of a petition filed with said Commission by the property owners of the area to be annexed; and, Section 2. That the territory to be annexed in uninhabited; and, Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory proposed: to be annexed is Annexation No. 27 (Mead) to County Sanitation District No. 7, the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit !'B", attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 4. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and,. Section 5. That provisions for annexation fees in the amount of $4lt-,~-86.6L1-have been satisfied by execution of a Straight Interest Bearing Note, payable within 5 year~ from date of approval of said annexation, secured by a Deed of Trust with A~signment of Rents, in a. form approved by the District 1 s General Counsel; and, 1~sr.mda Item #51+ District 7 Section 6. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Dvision 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described hereinabove, be and it is hereby ordered annexed to County Sanitation Distr~ct.No. 7 without notice or hearing and without election. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting April 12, 1972. Agenda. Item l/5h X-2 Di.strict 7 .. fFaref?ECJ FARROW DEVELOPMENT CORP. Maret{ 15; 19 72 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P. 0 .. Bx 8127 Fountain Valley, California Subject: Annexation of a Portion of Tract 6967 to District No. 7 GentlemenL 8550 Gorden Grove Blvd. Gorden Grove, California Telephone 530-2170 I hereby request annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 of the five acre parcel legally described as follows: Beginning at a point in the existing boundary of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County as established by the withdrawal dated January 25, 1961, and contained in Resolution No. 61-98, said point being the intersection of the centerline of Santiago Blvd. and the North line of the South half of Lot 12 of the Oge and Bond Tract as shown on a map thereof recorded in Book 3, Pages 430 and 431 of Miscellaneous Records of Los Angeles County, Calif; thence North 89° 44' 06 11 West 663.20 feet along the North line of the South half of said Lot 12, to the West line of the East half of the South half of said Lot 12; thence South o0 00' 49" East 332.94 feet along said West line to the South 'line of said Lot 12; thence South 890 47' 10" East 663.49 feet along said South line to the Southeast corner of said Lot 12, said point being on the centerline of Santiago Blvd.; thence North o0 03 1 50" West 332. 35 feet along the East line of said Lot 12 and the centerline of Santiago Blvd. to the point of beginning. The following .exhibits are attached: 1. Legal description as prepared by an engineer 2. Map of said property prepared by an engineer 3. Name and address of o~~er 4. The assessed value of the parcel 5. Total number ·,of voters in territory A Name of Real Estate Reliability RESALES • DEVELOPMENT • CONSTRUCTION • TRACT SALES • COMMERCIAL • INCOME • INDUSTRIAL • LAND • SUBDIVISION Y-1 District 7 We also have inclosed a check in the amount of $350.00 to cover processing costs. We hope that our package is complete, however, if there are any questions please contact me at the above number~ R. L. Farrow Agenda Item If 55 Y-2 District 7 cou;ny SA:HTATIO>l DISTRICTS 01~ ORA~:Gr: cou;;ry P. O. Box 8127 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER CONTRACTO~: SULLY-:·II LLER CO:~TR/\CT I~~G co~ lPANY c. o. iw. 7 ~--------r ATE Apr i 1 12, 1972 Jf'll~: SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOl1, REACI I 1, CO?ffRACT ~O. 7 -6-1 ------------------------~------___;----~----~~---------------------~..,----------------~ ...,,,,,,, Amount of this Change Order UUJDg (DEDUCT) $ __ 7_,_6_7_6_._o_o __ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract an<l/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. . ADJUSTHENT or-ENG 1:-rnER' s QUANTITIES ADD Item No. 3 6 7 9 DEl)UCT l 13 Unit L.F. V.F. V.F. V.F. L.P. Ea. Change From 10,098 250 41 31 1,402 1 h~rd authorization date: April 12, 1972 BOYLE ENG r~EEIU NG AP: end a I tern i/56 Est'J.. Quant. To 10,100 277 46 32 1,346 0 Change 2 27 5 1 56 1 Unit Price $147 $180 $200 $ 90 TOTAL $195 $3,000 ADD TOT.AL DEDUCT TOTAL DEDUCT $ 294.00 4,860.00 1,000.00 90.00 $ 6,244.00 $10,920.00 3,000.00 s.1 3 , 9 2 o • o o $ 7,676.00 Original Contract Price $2,290,481.00 Prev. Auth. ChangesC.O.f.fS $ 6,569.38 &· 6 A<l<ls ------~--~--~- This Change f.1XOOI) (DEDUCT) $ 7, 6 7 6. 0 0 ----------- Amended Contract Price S"' "nq '74 "'0 ._w~'-~-l'-·~t-~~-·-j_o~~-- z Approv8d: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange Co.unty, California By ----------...,.C ..... l_,li,.._c-,.f._.· --.i..,....~1-1 g1 nee r SULLY-ill LLEl~ co:nRACT I :~G CO'.-IP.-\1\Y Districts 1 & 7 COUHTY SA:HTATIO~~ DISTRICTS Of ORA~:GE cou;;ry P. O. Box 3127 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C • 0 • N 0 . 8 { FI NA L) CONTRACTOR: SULLY-MILL~R CONTRACTING COMPANY DATE April 12, 1972" Jrn:--~~___;;S~UNF~~LO~W~E~R-:=.;IN~T~E~R~C~E~P~T~O~R~,~RE~A~CH:..;......;l-....,~C~O~N~T~R~A~C~T__o;..;.N0--..._7~--6_-~l.__ __________ ~--.....,, Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ ___ -._;O~---- In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. . . The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of time due to inclement weather for the following time periods. October 28 -29, 1971 November 12, 1971 December 3, 1971 December 12 -13, 1971 December 22 -31, 1971 SUMMARY: Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date h~rd authorization date: April 12, 1972 BOYLE ENGINEERING Agenda Item //57 2 calendar days 1 calendar days 1 calendar days 2 calendar days 10 calendar days TOTAL TIME EXTENSION March 10, 1971 365 calendar days March 9, 1972 381 calendar days March 25, 1972 Original Contract Price Prev .. Au th. Changes 16 calendar days $ 2, 290' 481. 00 $ 6,569.38 This Change (ADD)(DEDUCT) $ -0- Amended Contract Price s 2,297,050.38 AA Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange Co~nty, California By __ ~~~--~~~~~~---,.,-~~..--~~ Chief Engineer SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY Districts 1 & (' RESOLUTION NO. 72-52-7 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-6-1 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-6-1 AS COMPLETE * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors :of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Sully-Miller Contracting Company, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for the Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 1, Contract No. 7-2AP-l, on March 25, 1972; and, Section 2. That by letter, Boyle Engineering, District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been compl~ted in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said engineers' recommendation, which said recommenda- tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 1, Contract No. 7~6-1, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 10th day of March, 1971; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 1972. Agenda Item #58 BB Districts 1 & 7 \.A..i l,J • l .L .1. .::.. -~ ; I l. -: : .:.. _;_ ...• i jj l.. .._: ~ ;-, .L \_, ... 0 u :...~ I._,.' ~ ....'-\ : l \J u \... v '.J • ' l l. P. o. EC-X 3~27 -lC.1 2:i1+ r~ lli s i\ ve:-;ue Fountain Valley, Califorr.ia 92708 CHAtrGE ORDER C .o·. NO. -------~~~------ COU'.fRACTOR: ERNEST E. PESTAI~A, L~C. DATE: Apr i 1 12 , 19 7 2 ,JOB: su;,a:LOl1'ER INTERCEPTOit; RE/\CII 2 z co:rrR1\CT iW. 7 -6-2 .Amount of this change order (ADD) (DEJJ~T) $ 1,195.00 ------ In accordance with.contract provisiori~, the following ·changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductioris from the contract price are hereby approved. · REFERENCE: Boyle Engineering's letter to tl1e District ~ dated April 21, 1971 an<l August 19, 1971. Boyle Engincer~ng's letter to Orange County Flood Control District dated August 19~ 1971. Contractor's let tcr to District <lated i1 larch ·21, 1972. . . TOTAL ADD-$ 1,195.00 Original Contract Price $ 1,278,238.00 Prev. Auth. Changes c.0.#3 A<l<l$ _____ 2_,_1_4_2_._o_o __ rrhis Change (ADD) (BlS!SfS"Jt!') $ 1,195.00 Amended Contract Price $1,281,575.0Q Board authorization date: Approved: April 12, 1972 - Ae;enda Item #59 cc COUN'l1 Y s.~NITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Ch1ei' Engineer . ERNEST E. PESTANA, INC. Districts 1 & 7 cou:rrry SANIT;\TIG~r DI~~'T?ICTS OF ORl\!~GE COUT;TY P. 0. BOX 8127 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER c.o·. No._s ______ _ CONTRACTOR: EI(NEST E .. PESTAl~A, 1;-.;c. DATE: April ~2, 1972 ~ JOB: ·su~JFLQ;~ER n;tERCEPTOR' RL\Cll 2' CO.~TRACT NO. 7 -6-2 Amount of this change order (ADD) (~Nr°l'rn~ ~;£';t}I $ ___ s .ll.-, 6..-9--4 __ • ..;..a .;...o _ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. · ADJUSTHEHT or E~GINEER' s QUA:nITIES ADD Item Change No. Unit From 2 L.F. 168 4 V .F .' 130 5 V.F. 41 7 V.F. 62 DEDUCT 1 L.F. 7119 9 Ea. 2 11 C.Y. 10 "-"" Board authorization date: April 12, 1972 Arren':Ja Item #60 _...;...· '------~;..;.._-- Est '<l. Quant. To 196 138 43 68 7091 1 0 Change 28 @ 8 @ 2 @ 6 @ 28 @ 1 @ 10 @ Unit Price $300 $230 $265 s 70 TOTAL ADD $1. 5 7 $500 s 60 $ 8,400.00 1,340.00 530.00 420.00 $ 11,190.00 $ 4,396.00 500.00 600.00 TOTAL DEDUCT . $ S,496.00 TOTAL ADD $ 5,694.00 ========= Original Contract Price $ 1,278,238.00 Prev. Auth. ChangesC.0.#31~ 4 $ 3.~37._Q_Q_ . Add _This Change {ADD) (~~§!f) $ __ ~5_....,_6_94-..;~_o_o_ Amended Contract Price $ 1,287,269.00 DD Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Ch' ., uleI El{NEST E. PESTAl~A, I NC. Engineer Districts 1 & 7 co:<TRACTOR: JOB: cou:ay S:\:JI'L\TIO~~ DISTi~JCTS OF OP./\~:GE cou;iTY P. O. Box 8127 -lOo·l•l Ellis ,\venue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CIIM·~GE OlU>z:R c.o. i\(J. ERNEST E. PESTANA z INC: DATE April SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR, REACH 2, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-2 ~ Amount of this Change Order· (ADD) (DEDUCT) 6 (FINAL) 12, 19'""(2 $ -0- In '·accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract h·ork arc hereby ~uthorizcc.l and as corapensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. . .. REFERENCE: Contractor's letter to the District dated July 16, 1971. The Contractor is hereby grante~ an extension of time for the foll~wing reasons: The Contractor after his initial starting was required to delay his operations for several weeks until the Telephone Company moved a cable out of the trench prism. This cable location. vJas shown on the plans outside of trenching area but the actual field location revealed a conflict with the trunk sewer. 35 calendar days Change Order No. 3 required extra time. 5 calendar days The Contractor was forced to delay the jacking of the casing under.the flood control structures at a time later than that scheduled because of the above mentioned extensions of time. The Contractor had to substitute the jacking subcontractor to continue operation because the original subcontractor was committed to anothe·r project. 25 calendar days Jnclement Weather for the following time periods: October 28 -29, 1971 2 calendar days November 12, 1971 1 calendar day December 3, 1971 1 calendar day December 12 13, 1971 2 calendar days December 22 -31, 1971 10 calendar days Total Time Extension due to Weather 16 calendar days TOTAL TIME EXTENSION 81 calendar days -1- Agenda Item //61 EE-1 Districts 1 & 7 COUNTY SA:HTATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COU1ffY P. O. Box 8127 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. 6 (Page 2) CONTRACTOR: ERNEST E. PESTANA. INC. DATE April 12, 1972 ~3:~---------"S~UNF----.~LO---.W~E~R~I~N~TE-=R~C~E~P~TO..----.R~,~R~IB~A~C~H..__._2~,__;;..CO~N~'l~'R~A~C~T'--'-'N~0~.-7~--6_-_2,__ ______________ ~ Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ -0----------- In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Continued SUMMARY: Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date ~ard authorization date: April 12, 1972 Agenda Item #61 .Apri 1 29, 1971 240 calendar days December ·25, 1971 321 calendar days March 15, 1972 Original Contract Price $ 1,278,238.00 Pr ev. Au th . Changes C • 0 • # $ __ ___..9~•...;;:0;._.3'-=l ....... _,.O;...::O;.....__ 3,4 & 5 This Change (ADD)(DEDUCT) $ -0-_____ ._;;_ ___ _ Amended Contract Price s 1,287,269.00 EE-2 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By-----------~~----------~~ lnef Engineer ERNEST E. PESTANA, INC •. Districts 1 & 7 RESOLUTION NO. 72-53-7 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-6-2 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-6-2 AS COMPLETE * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Ernest E. Pestana, Inc., has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for the Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 2, Contract No. 7-6-2, on March 15, 1972; and, Section 2. That by letter, Boyle Engineering, District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the Distrtct has concurred in said engineers' recommendation, which said recornrnenda- tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the ~unflower Interceptor, Reach 2, Contract No. 7-6-2, is heneby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 29th day of April, 1971, and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 1972. Agenda Item #62 FF Districts 1 & '7 COUlffY SA:HTATION DISTRICTS OF ORA~GE COUiffY P. O. Box 8127 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CJ IA:~GE ORDER C.O. NO. 1 CONT~\CTOR: !\ORTl iER:~ co:HRACT I:~G CO.'IPANY ~--~~----~--~----DATE April lh 197~2.__ ___ _ '"r-,: REDHILL r;ffERCEPTOR, REACHES 6, 7 4 8, JOB r~O. 7-6-4 Amount of this Change Order· (ADD) (DEDUCT) s _____ -_.;o~--- In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work arc hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from t11e contract price are hereby approved. .. REFERENCE: Contractor's letter to the District dated Nov. 24, 1971. Transmitting Aneron shop · drawing and laying diagram. Section 108 of the specifications. T11e Contractor shall install 42" diameter RCP instead of 39" cliameter VCP as called for in the subject contract. Any additional expense for this change will be borne by the Contractor and there will be no additional chaJ:ge to the District. Original Contract Price Prev. Au th. Changes This Change (ADD)(DEDUCT) Amended Contract Price ~ard authorization date: Approved: $ 486,108.70 $ -0- $ -0- s 486,108.70 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California April 12, 1972 By ____ ~~~----~-----...,.-----.....--c'----~~ Cluef Engineer NORTHER:·r CONTRACTING COHPANY By~-------------------------------~ Agenda Item #63 GG District 7 CLARK MILLER C. ARTHUR NISSON NELSON KOGLER H. LAWSON M £AO MILLER, NISSON & KOGLER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2 014 N 0 RT H El RO/'.OW.r>.Y SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 9270G March 31, 1972 Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester· Secretary of the Board of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Re: County Sanitation District No. 7 Ordinance 714 Dear Wayne: Please put on the Agenda for the regular meet- ing April, a motion for District No. 7 as follows: Moved that the staff and Cities be instructed not to collect any fees provided for under the provisions of Ordinance 714 in that it is the in- tent of the Boar~ of Directors to repeal Ordinance 714 and replace it with Ordinance 715, effective July 1, 1972. I believe this procedure more practical than attempting to do a special ordinance repealing 714 at this point. If there are any questions, please call. CAN:ac cc: Cliff Miller, Chairman District·No. 7 Very truly yours, MILLER, NISSON & KOGLER C. Arthur Nissan TELEPHONE: 542-6771 Agenda Item #64 -HH-District 7 • RESOLUTION NO. 72-54-7 AUTH~RIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM PAUL M. WOLFF AND ANNE K. WOLFF A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM PAUL M. WOLFF AND ANNE K. WOLFF * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE; DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section lo That certain Grant of Easement dated March 17, 1972, wherein an easement for sanitary sewer purposes is granted to County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby accepted from Paul M. Wolff and Anne K. Wolff; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said easement is granted in connection with providing sewer service for Ted G. Hays Development located on Greenwald Lane in Santa Ana relative to "Clover Circle Sewer"; and, Section 4. That said easement is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the Board.of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, be authorized arid directed to record said Grant of Easement is the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 1972. Agenda Item #65(a) -II.:.. District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 72-55-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM FRANK & GLORIA FUNDAK A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM FRANK J. FUNDAK AND GLORIA A. FUNDAK * * ·* * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, Californi~, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain Grant of Easement dated March 22, 1972, wherein an easement for sanitary sewer purposes is granted to County Sanitation District No. 7, is hereby accepted from Frank J. Fundak and Gloria A. Fundak; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said easement is granted in connection with providing sewer service for Ted G. Hays Development located on Green- wald Lane in Santa Ana relative to "Clover Circle Sewer"; and, Section 4. That said easement is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California . . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 1972. Agenda Item #65(b) -JJ-District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 72-56-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM TED & VIRGINIA HAYS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM TED G. HAYS AND VIRGINIA HAYS * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain Grant of Easement dated March 17, 1972, wherein an easement for sanitary sewer purposes is granted to County Sanitation District No. 7, is hereby accepted from Ted G. Hays and Virginia Hayes; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits 11 A11 and 11 B11 , attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said easement is granted in connection with providing sewer service for Ted G. Hays Development located on Greenwald Lane in Santa Ana relative to "Clover Circle Sewer"; and, Section 4. That said easement is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 1972. Agenda Item #65(c) -KK-District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 72-57-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM TED & VIRGINIA HAYS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM TED G. HAYS AND VIRGINIA HAYS * * *: * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINED AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain Grant of Easement dated March 17, 1972, wherein an easement for sanitary sewer purposes is granted to County Sanitation District No. 7, is hereby accepted from Ted G. Hays and Virginia Hays; and, Section 2. That the real property over which ·said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said easement is granted in connection with providing sewer service for Ted G. Hays Development located on Greenwald Lane in Santa Ana relative to "Clover Circle·Sewer"; and, Section 4. That said easement is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 1972. Agenda Item #65(d) LL District 7 Chairman Just After Adoption of Resolution of Commendation Presenta~io~ of gavel plaque to ~ir~ctor Lindsley Parsons, who served as Chairman of District No. 5 from 1966 to 1972. Presentation of gavel plaque to Director Clifton Miller who served as Joint Chairman from 1969 to 1970. Presentation of gavel plaque to Director Norman Culver who served as Joint Chairman from 1970 to 1971. EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR J OINT MEET I NG OF THE :BOP.RDS OF DIPECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS . l, 2 , 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 , OF OH1~,NGS COUNTY, CALIFORNIP. A regula r joint mee ting of the Boa rds of Di re ctors of County Sanitation Dis tric ts Nos . 1, 2 , 3, 5, 6 , 7, and 11, of Orange County , California , wa s held at the hou r of 7:3 0 p.m., Apr il 12 , 19 72 , 10844 Ellis Avenue , Founta i n Va lley , California . The ChairQan of t he Joint A1min~strative Organization called the weeting to order at 7:30 p.n . The roll was c alled an d the Sec r etary re por t e~ a quo rum present for ea c h Distri c t's Boar d . * * * * * * * * * DISTR I CT 2 Adjournment Moved , seconded and duly carr i ed : That th i s meeting of the Boar d of Directors of County Sanitation Di strict No . 2 , be adjour ned to Apri l 27 , 1972, at 5:30 p.m. The Chairman th en dec lared t he meet i ng so adjour ned at 8 :49 p .m., Apri l 12, 1972 . STATE OF CALIFORNIAl SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J . WAYNE SY LVESTER , Sec r etary of eac h of the Boar ~s of Directors of Co un ty Sanitation Distr i 2 ts Nos. 1, 2 , 3 , S, 6, 7, an d 11 , of Or ange County , California, "o hereby certify that the a b ove an d foregoing to be full , true an ~ c or r ect copy of mi nute entrie s on meeting of sai~ Board s of Directors o n the 12th da y of April , 19 72 12th S-1 07 IN WI TNESS WHEREOF, I have h ereunto set my han rl this ~ay of April, 1 972 oar f s of Director s itation Dis t ricts Nos . 6, 7 , an d 11 • Regular Joint Meeting -April 12, 1972 #5 -Report of Joint Chairman Read Resolution commending Lindsley Parsons. Motion to adopt resolution was moved , seconded and carried. Presented gavel plaque to Lindsley Parsons (Chairman of Dist. 5 from 1966 to 1972). Presented gavel plaque to Clifton Mil ler (Joint Chairman from 1969 to 1970.) Presented gavel plaque to Norman Culver (Joint Chairman from 1970 to -1971). No Executive session this month . #6 -Report of General Manage r Reported on trip to Washington, D.C.-Went to meeting where top officials of EPA were present, and received through those contacts their feelings on what should be and is going to be done.and definition of secondary treatment. They are beginning to recognize some of the problems on setting blanket requirements throughout U.S. At a recent meeting in L.A. they started recognizing cost benefits. There seems to be a willingness to at least listen to people in the day-to-day end of the business. At meeting in Washington Vice Chairman of SWRCB, E. F. Dibble, gave written presentation. As to discharges in California, pending legisla- tion calls for secondary treatment. Has held public hearing on ocean disposal policy. This was first indiaation that State Board was becoming concerned re blanket regulations. Wi ll have meeting tomorrow (13th) with Mr . Dibble in Sacramento to di sc u ss find i ngs on "point- source control"(?). State Board is interested in t his phase of it. Will be another hearing on state water quality plan for oceans of Cal ifornia . May be calling on some Directors, if n ecessary , to be at h ear ing in Sacramento on th e 20 th. J"Y #):?i"-Nisson report ed on action taken in Dist. 3 meeting ~~.,!~ #36 -Anaheim Hills Annexation No .1 -Annexation No . 6 ?(c)-With r egard to letter from City of Anaheim, when area is developed and needs sewerage, we coul d place some type of charge on property . If annexation fe e is waived on this property, this condition should be made and document should b e recorded so there would be some - thing so that at such time property is developed, they would pay an in-lieu fee equal to whatever the annexation fee was then . Wedaa -Asked if prese nt annexation fee is $369 per acre, explain how this is figured and how often this is re-figur ed . FAH -Annexation fee is developed for District 2 and based on require- --ments n ecessary to cp~wlete proposed or pre l iminary master plan deve l oped for District. This fee is escalated annually based on two conditions : On L.A . index of FWPCA, which includes EPA, and cost of construction iddex or $10, whichever is greate~ to k eep up with additional costs of construction . Master Plan based on land use plan developed in 1 969 . Anne xation fee does not take densities into considerati on- Wedaa -Wh e n city upgrades land usage from Rl to R4, there is no additi ona l charg e . This is unfair for other cities . Should re -evaluate a nn exation fee procedure to be fair for al l c ities concerned . Joint Mtg . p . 2 FAH -District 3 annexation po l icy calculated differently.-$630 per acre . District 7 -$369 . Effective July 1 connection charge per unit will go from $150 to $250 . Finne ll -Asked if the order of items 36 & 37 shouldn 't be reversed . "Should we a nnex" should come before "when we annex ". Ni:Glfl~*Xw!~Xm101~ ~m«xE ~E ~m~~mxt~x t xEx~x ~t ~mx~~4 Finnell -Ha s heard from some Di rect ors that they were working with large industrial devel opme nt to get axea into cit y . Que stioned whether indus t ry cou l d be allowed because of capacity problem in District 2 . Now we are talking about annexing over 1000 acres and if we already have a seri ous problem in capac ity , should we consider thi s? Wi ll not vote for annexation if this increases problem tremendously . What effect will this have? FAH -City of Anaheim is aware of this and knows they can 't go whole -hog on it . Hopefu lly, will ge t Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer startedi Have May 11th bid opening date . It 's ouv i n tention to get contract underway and these facilities will be const r ucte d . We have a time scheduae and have lost a l ot of time worki n g with upstream agencies . Don't kn ow wh at ~es t ri c ti ons we would place on t his area . Winn -Moved that a separate meeting be held for Dist . 2 to consider this further. Items 36(c), (d) & (e) were def e rred to a d journed mtg . Mo tion mad e to initiate annexation proceedings . Substitute motion to table motion . (Stevenson '· in opposit i on) Mo tion was -tabled . (Item # 37) Mot ion made to h o ld adjourned meeting Apri l 27th at 5:30 p .m. #42 -Other business #2 Wedaa -Re a nnexation f ee s , District 2 a nnexati on fees need re -exam in a ~i on . Moved that staff be directed to condu ct study and give Ch airman no tifca- tion completed and r eady . Mot ion seconded and carried. #5 1 -Other business #3 McWhinney -Asked if it is ~ possibility to have a consent calendar on individual District things like we do for joint . #53 -Orange Park Acres FAH -Recommended t his be carr i ed-over to May meeting . Moved & seconded . #54 -Mead Anne xation Mi l ler -Mov e d that this be carried-over to May 10 Mtg . Moved & seconded. .......... #13 -Nisson reported on 20 -acre parce l of land on end of LA County about to be annexed to Long Beach. Said it was not feasible to sewer through Long Beach facilities because of San Gabriel River and a canal. It was proposed that Dist. 3 enter into an agreement with City of Lo n g Beach re collection of sewerage fees and payme nt to District . District 3 postponed action until next meeting . EXCERPTS FRmr TSE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING o-r. TEE BOP.RDS OF DIP.ECTORS OF COUNTY SP.NITATION DIS ;~':-\ICTS I~OS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 an 4 11, OF 0RhNGS CC~NTY, CALI~ORNIP A regular joint meeti.ng of the Boards of Directors 8f County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, an~ 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., April 12 , 19 72 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint A1min~strative Organization called the weeting to order at 7:30 p,~. The roll was called an~ the Secretary reporte~ a quorum present for each District's Boar~. * * * * * * * * * This 12th day of April, 1972, District 6 Adjournment at 7:30 p.m., in the District's office at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California, being the time and place for the Regular Joint Meeting of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange County, California, and there not being a quorum present of the Board of District No. 6, the meeting of said District was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary to the 17th day of April, 1972, at 5:00 p.m. STATE OF CALIFORNIA~ COUNTY OF ORANGE ~ SS, I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boar~s of Directors of County Sanitation Distri~ts Noso 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, io hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true an~ correct copy of minute entries on meeting of sa irJ Boards of Directors on the 12th clay of April 19 72 ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hanrl this 12th S-107 ·-lay of April, 1972 ar~s of Directors itation Districts Nos. 6, 7, and 11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFC;JRNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) Gentlemen: April 7, 1972 NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING DISTRICT MO. 7 Wednesday, 7:00 p.m., April 12, 1972 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 Pursuant to adjournment of the adjourned meeting held March 21, 1972, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 will meet in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date immediately preceding the regular Joint Meeting. The purpose of this meeting is to conduct a public hearing for Assessment District No. 9. JWS:rb NOTE: REFER TO NOT I CE OF REGULAR \JO I NT MEET I NG FOR MAPS OF -~ DET'OUR NECESSARY TO. ENTER PLANT NO I 1 . II BO ARD S OF DIRE CTORS County Sani tation Districts P. 0. Sox 8127 10844 Ell is Av enue Fountdi n Valley, Cal i f ., 92708 of Orange Cou nty, Cal ifo rnia n1~1R1 rT N Liiv I I\..... I I 0. 7 • Adjourned Regular Meeting Apr i l 12 , 1972 -7:00 p .m. AGENDA )J.~ Ro ll Ca ll ( 6 ) ( 7) (8) ( 9 ) Appointment of Chairman pr o tern , i f necessary Report of the Genera l Manager Report of the General Co u nsel Hearing -Assessment District No . 9 (Pr oceedings can be referr e d to special counsel fo r the assessment district , if desired) ~ ->-Jl-.,s \S .t.t..._ h""-~ ~~ ·~\llr J Tc>v-4~ (a ) Secretary am1ounees A hearing in the matt e r of construction of sanitary se wers and appurtances and appurtant work Ain "Assespment District No . ~{ ~ :.c... Y~vei-; \"'V!>f"~ "~~""' !,. •• o.) •'°''> ,,..._,..,,,...,t1. \o ,( \~ ~ v.i~~ i 1wtl J A.-• $N--U.:1.o r..i 4l. o '· J { ' ~ l ,/ (b) Secretary reports on w:ei tten protests , if any 0 €es. ,~ lllL ,... iN (>" 111 1Ji6.t"l 1 6)\I J.,, ~~ 1 .... r ..... ~t~~ ~,tr ... (c ) Chairman hears protests · or objections , if' any @ N) .... ,_ t,.., ~i {., r-rl 1 """'··~'I 11~~. Consideration of Reso l ution No. 72 -43-7 , a ~esol u tion of the Board of Director s of County Sa nitation Distri ct No . 7 of Orange County , Ca l ifornia , order ing the work described i n Resolution of Intention No. 7 2-42 -7 , "Ass es sment Distric t No . 9 " of said Di s trict (Copy atta ched) Considerat i on of Re s o l ution No. 72 -44 -7, a resolution o f t he Boar d of Directors of County Sanitation District No . 7 of Orange County~ Ca li fornia , adopted pursuant t o th e a u thority g r anted by Section 5243 of t h e Streets a nd Highways Code of t he State of Califor nia , directing. tha t the bids or proposals fo r the work to be constructed in "Assessment District No . 9 " may be opened , examine d and declared by the Secretary prior to the p r esentation t o the Board of Directors (Copy attached) .5 '1.. ..:V t-1/: 4.M. Ot h er b u s i ness and com.mu n i cations , if any Consid erati on o f mot i on t o adjourn T"i \"'1... 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY 2 MINUTES FOR HEARING ON RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 72-42-7 · 3 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9 4 April 12, 1972 7 :00 p. m. 5 6 The Secretary re.ported that this was the time and place fixed for the 7 hearing of protests or objections against the work or the District, as 8 described in Resolution of Intention No. 72-42-7, in the matter of the con- 9 st ruction of sanitary sewers and appurtenances and appurtenant work in 10 "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NOO 9," as described in said resolution. 11 The Secretary also reported that affidavits in support of the publi- 12 cation of the Resolution of Intention, the mailing of printed notices of the 13 adoption of said resolution, and the posting of the Notice of Improvement, as 14 required by law, had been made and are on file in the office of the Secretary. 15 ·· The Chairman then inquired of the Secretary if any written protests or 16 objections against the work or the District had been filed with him in said 17 matter. The Secretary reported that 'Y\ o written protests had been filed . 18 \~ 1. / : ," " .. ). I ) with him prior to the ti_me set for the hearing by the following: \~\~~ !. ,. !> I 19 \ ~ ' ' . I ~ -,,, 20 21 22 23 24 The Chairman then announced that this was the time and place set 25 for the hearing of protests or objections against the work or the district, 26 each as set forth in the Resolution of Intention he reinbefore mentioned, and 27 asked if anyone present desired to be heard in said matter. 28 29 30 31 32 LAW OFFICES OF RIME~~~~VEY & II FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA, I CALIFORNIA. 92701 ;I -1- 1 The Board of Directors having before it a diagram of the assessment 2 dist~ict and being familiar with .the assessment district, and there being no protests filed, Director 1.J-,·· presented the following resolution ----------- 4 and moved its adoption: 5 WHEREAS, it appearing that no protests, either written or oral, 6 protesting against the doing of the work and improvement described 7 in Resolution of Intention No .. 72-42-7, or against the assessment 8 district therein described, have been filed; and 9 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors having considered the area 10 of district represented; 11 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by this Board of 12 Directors that it does he re by find and determine that no protests or 13 objections have been made by any owners of the area of the property 14 to be assessed for said work and improvement as set forth in said 15 Resolution of Intention No. 72-42-7; and 16 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said resolution be approved 17 and the proceedings be approved. I I 18 Said motion was seconded by Director .// and carrie ~---.......__..__~~~~~ 19 by the following roll call vote: 20 AYES: 21 NOES: 22 ABSENT: 23 24 25 Director d· l,, then offered and moved the adoption of ~~--~~--~ Resolution Ordering \Vork No. ' in the matter of the construction ---·--- 26 of sanitary sewers and appurtenances and appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT 27 QISTRICT NO. 9" In Cou~ty Sapitation District No. 7, which motion was I 28 seconded by Director __ ...... 10 __ ._ __ ,_. _:J_·._" ___ and upon roll call vote was adopted by 29 the follo~ing roll call vote: 30 AYES: 31 NOES: 32 ABSENT: LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL, HARVEY & LOGAN FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 -2- (If the re a re NO D rote sts) l 2 ·3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2? 28 29 30 31 32 LAW OFFICES 01" RIMEL, HARVEY & LOGAN FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. I SANTA ANA, 11 CALIFORNIA 92.701 After all protests and objections had been made, it was moved by Director and seconded by Director and ~~~-~~ -~~-~--~ unanimously carried by the roll call vote of all Directors present, that all written protests be referred to the Engineer of Work for checking and report as to the percentage of the area represented thereby. (And that this hearing be continued until , 197 2, at o'clock -~-~~~---~~---~~ __ ....,..___ p. m. for the purpose of receiving the report of the Engineer of Work and for further action in the matter.) (The Secretary reported that this was the time and place to which the hearing of protests or objections against the work or the District, as described in Resolution of Intention No. , in the matter of the construction of sanitary sewers and appurtenances and appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9" was continued for the purpose of hearing ·· the report of the Engineer of \Vork as to percentage of protests and for fur- ther action.) The Engineer _of ·work reported that the protests repres~nted less than % of the total area of the assessment district. ---- All protestants having been heard and an opportunity having been given to all persons desiring to be heard, and a full, fair and impartial hearing having been granted, and the Board of Directors having before it a diagram of the Assessment District and being ·familiar with the assessment district and also having considered all protests filed, and having considered the matter as to the area of property represented by protestants, Director presented the following minute resolution and moved its --------· q.doption: WBE REAS, certain prate sts have been filed by ----,.-,,-.---and others, protesting against the doing of the work and improvement described· in Resolution of Intention No. 72-42-7 or against the Assessment District therein described; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has carefully considered an· protests or objections and having considered the area of the District represented by said protests; NCJW, THEREFORE, BE IT RiS:30LVED, by this Board of Directors -2- (If the re A RE prate sts) l 2 ·3 4 5 6 ? 8 9 10 11 12 that it does hereby find and determine that the said protests or objections have been made by the owners of less than one-half of the area of the prop2 rty to be assessed for said work and improve- ment, as set forth in said Resolution of Intention No. 72-42 -7; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that each and all of the said pro- tests or objections be and they he re by 1:re o;erruled and denied. Said motion was seconded by Director ~<---'-i.-~) and carried by the fol- lowing roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Director 1 ,J/\ then offered and moved the adoptiori of ..J..tn.:..,.<-_..:;._----- RESOLUTION ORDERING WORK NO. in the matter of the ----- 13 canst ruction of sanitary sewers and appurtenances and appurtenant work in 14 "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9," which motion was. seconded by Director 15 and upon roll call vote was adopted by the following vote: 16 AYES: 17 NOES: 18 ABSENT: 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL. HARVEY Be LOGAN FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA. 92701 -3- {If the re A RE protests) I ,. I I I MEETING DATE _ _.;..~_rl_'\._r"'l_'L-. ____ TIME __ 1_'._o_u __ DISTRICTS __ 7_· _____ _ DISTRICT 1 (HERRIN) ••••• GRISET <cASP~Rs) •••• BATTIN (coco) ....... MILLER PORTER DJC-TRICT 2 ~H'!t.EMAN) •••• SMITH ROOT) •••.•••• CHRISTIE JACKSON) •••• CLARKJ ROBT CULVER (GOMEZ) •••••• FINNELL (GR I SET) •••• • HERRIN HARPER) ••••• JUST CASPERS) •••• PHILLIPS ZUNIGA) •••• • SIMS DUTTON) ••••• STEPHENSON MACHADO) •••. WEDAA SCHNIEPP) ••• WINN DISTRICLl -~ROES EN)· • • • HYDE CASPERS) •••• BATTIN WESTRA). ····BERTON ROOT) ••••••• CHRISTIE JACKSON) •••• CLARKJ ROBT CULVER (FONTE)······DAVIS (MC CRACKEN). GREEN ! JUST).······ HARPER KANEL) •••••• HARVEY GR I SET).···· HERRIN LEWIS).····· HEMEON BARNES) ••••• HOLDEN MC WHINNEY (ZUNIGA)····· SIMS (DUTTON) ••••• STEPHENSON DISTRICT 5 PARSONS CASPERS (CROUL) •••••• HIRTH DISTRICT 6 PORTER CASPERS (HIRTH) •••••• MC INNIS __.___ ---- --~·~ .. t 7 t,. y ",. ... -DISTRICT 7 ' -- (coco) .. )" ... MILLER SJw -~-__ ..r. ___ v_ (CASPERS •••• CLARK) ~t~I ~ _.;_ --~- (HERRIN) ••••• GRISET -"'-__ ..,.,_ --"- PORTER .... IA .... (FISCH~ACH) •• QUIGLEY ~ ~ / (HIRTH) •••••• ROGERS I)._ __Q:__ c... (~ .EMAN) •••• SMITH ~ _:L --r ~ DISTRICT 11 (MC CRACl<EN). SHIPLEY (CASPERS) •.•• BAKER COEN DISTRICT 8 (GOLDBERG) ••• BOYD CASPERS MITCHELL JO I NT BOP.R.DS (HARPER)· • • • ·JUST __ -- (CASPERS)··· ·BAKER __ -- (CASPERS)···· BATTIN __ -- (WESTRA)···· ·BERTON .--__ CASPERS ___ _ ~ROOT)· • • • • ··CHRIST IE ___ _ JACKSON)··· ·CLARK) ROBT ___ _ CASPERS)···· CLARK) RALPH ___ _ COEN __ -- CULVER ___ _ (FONTE)····· ·DAVIS ___ _ (GOMEZ)····· ·FINNELL ___ _ (FISCHBACH)· ·QUIGLEY ___ _ (MC CRACKEN) ·GREEN __ -- (HERRIN)···· ·GRISET ___ _ (JUST) • • • • • .. ·HARPER ___ _ (KAN EL) • • • • • ·HARVEY ___ _ (LEWI s) ······HEMEON ___ _ (GR I SET)···· ·HERRIN __ -- (CROUL) ······HIRTH __ -- ~HOGARD) • • • • ·HOLDEN ___ _ KROES~N) ····HYDE __ -- HIRTH) ••• ~··MC INNIS ___ _ MC WHINNEY _. __ _ (coco) ...... ·MILLER ---- PARSONS ___ _ (CASPERS)··· ·PHILLIPS ___ _ PORTER ___ _ (HIRTH)····· ·ROGERS ___ _ (MC CRACKEN) ·SHIPLEY ---- (ZUNIGA)···· ·SIMS __ -- (HILEMAN)··· ·SMITH __ -- (DUTTON) • ·····STEPHENSON ___ _ (MACHADO) •••• WEDAA ---- (SCHN 1 EPP) ••• WINN ---- * * * * MITCHELL (GOLDBERG) ••• BOYD OTHERS HARPER BROWN SYLVESTER LEWIS DUNN CLARKE SIGLER NISSON CRABB BROWN TAYLOR CARLSON FINSTER GALLOWAY . HOHENER HOWARD HUNT KEITH BOETTNER LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON MU RONEY PIERSALL STEVENS i.~Ht "" -. . . l...c~ l \(VI IJ ~t l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LAW OFFICES Of' RIMEL. HARVEY & LOGAN FOURTH t'LOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 RESOLUTION NO. 72-43-7 ------- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTOHS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOO 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK DESCRIBED IN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 72-42-7, "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9 11 OF SAID DISTHICT. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALI.FORNIA, pursuant to the provisions of the "Improvement Act of 1911, 11 being Division 7 of the Streets and High- ways Code of the State of California, does HESOL VE as follov;·s: That the public interest and convenience require the work herein- after mentioned to be done and, therefore, the said Board of Directors hereby orders the ·following work to be done and improvements to be made in said County Sanitation District No. 7·of Orange County, to-wit: The construction of sanitary sewers and all appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection therewith in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9" in said County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, all as more par- ticularly described in Resolution of Intention No. 72-42-7, passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said Sanitation District on March 21, For further particulars, reference is hereby made to said Resolution of Intention No. 72-42-7 and to the plans, profiles and drawings on file in the offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work of said sanitation district, and to the specifications for the said work heretofore adopted by the said Board of Directors and on file in the offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work for said district, and all of said plans, profiles, drawings and specifications heretofore approved by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District No. 7 are incorporated herein and refe re nee is he re by made the re to for a more particular description of said work. Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that the contemplated work and improvement heretofore mentioned was, in the opin- ion of said Board of Directors, of more than local or ordinary public -1- l benefit, and the said Board of Directors has made the expense of said work 2 chargeable upon a district. For the particular description of said district, 3 refe rencc is he re by made to said Resolution of Intention No. 72-42-7. 4 Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that serial 5 bonds bearing interest at the rate of seven per cent (7%) per annum and 6 extending over a period ending nine (9) years from the second day of 7 January next succeeding the next September 1st following their date, will 8 be issued hereunder in the manner provided by the "Improvement Act of 9 1911, 11 being Part 5, Division 7 of ihe Streets and Highways Code of the 10 State of California, to represent each assessment of Fifty Dollars ($50. 00) 11 or more remaining unpaid at the expiration of the last date fixed for payment 12 of assessment in the notice to property owners mailed pursuant to the pro- 13 visions of Section 5390 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of 14 California. 15 Said Board of Directors has elected and determined to have the 16 redemption provisions of said bonds provide a premium of five per cent 17 (5%) of the unmatured principal in accordance with the provisions of Section 18 6464 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. 19 All of the work herein ordered shall be done and carried through 20 in pursuance of an Act of the Legislature of the State of California, desig- 21 nated the "Improvement Act of 1911, 11 being Division 7 of the Streets and 22 Highways Code. 23 All of the said work shall be done under the dire ct ion of and to the 24 satisfaction of the Engineer of Work and all of the mate rials used shall com - 25 ply with the specifications and be to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work. 26 The Secretary of said County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby 27 directed to post conspicuously for five (5) days on or near the Chamber door 28 of the Board of Directors of said county sanitation district, in the manner 29 and form required by said Code, a Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals or Bids 30 for doing the work herein ordered, and the Secretary is hereby directed to 31 publish twice in THE ORANGE CITY NEWS, a weekly newspaper printed 32 and published four times weekly and of general circulation in said county and LAW oirf'ICE9 OF RIMEL, HARVEY Be LOGAN FOURTH FLOOR -2-1010 NOHTll MAIN ST. SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 l district and hereby designated by the said Board of Directors for that pur- 2 pose, a Notice inviting such proposals or bids for doing the said work and 3 referring to specifications on file. 4 ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this day of ~~~ ~~~~- 5 1972. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL, HARVEY & LOGAN !"OURTH Fl.OCR 1010 NORTH MAIN !lT, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 ATTEST: Chairman Secretary -3- l CERTIFICATION 2 I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of COUNTY SANITATION 3 DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, California, do hereby certify that 4 the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted at a -~------~--~~ 5 regular meeting of the Board of Direcfors of said County Sanitation District 6 No. 7 of Orange County, held on the day of ---' 1972' ------- 7 by the following vote of the members of the Board: 8 9 10 11 12 AYES: Directors NOES: ABSENT: and I further certify that , as Chairman , and ~--~~--~-~ ---~ 13 J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, as Secretary, signed and approved said Resolution 14 15 16 17 18 on the day of , 1972. -------~~--~ Secretary, County Sanitation District No. 7 19 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS. 20 County of Orange ) 21 I, J 0 WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of COUNTY SANITATION 22 DISTRICT NO. 7 OF OR.i\NGE COUNTY, California, do hereby certify that 23 the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Hesolution No. 24 passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation Dis- 25 26 2? 28 29 30 31 32 trict No. 7 of Orange County at a --------regular meeting the re of held on the day of , 1972. ----~----~-- ·-IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official Seal of said District this ___ day of _________ , 1972. Secretary, County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County LAW Ol'FICF.9 OF RIMEL, HARVEY & LOGAN f'OURTH FLOOR IOI<> NOHTH MAIN ST, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2? ,,_..,.. 28 29 30 31 32 I.AW OFFICES OF RIMEL, HARVEY llc LOGAN FOURTH rLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST, 6ANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 RESOLUTION NOO 72-44-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOO 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY GRANTED BY SECTION 5243 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THAT THE BIDS OR PROPOSALS FOR THE WORK TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN "ASSESSMENT DISTHICT N0 0 9 11 MAY BE OPENED, EXAMINED AND DECLARED BY THE SECRETARY PRIOR TO THE PRE- SENTATION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTOIIBo WHEREAS, Section 5243 of the Streets and Highways Code of the,.. State of California, being a part of the "Improvement Act of 1911, 11 provides that bids or proposals for construction work shall be publicly opened, examined, and declared in open session by the legislative body, and further provides that the legislative body may, by resolution, authorize such pro- posals or bids to be opened, examined and declared by an officer designated in a resolution for later presentation to the legislative body; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, does hereby RESOLVE and ORDER as follows: Section 1: That pursuant to the authority granted by Section 5243 of said Streets and Highways Code, and with respect to the proposals and bids expected to be received by this District for the work to be constructed in "Assessment District No. 9, 11 such proposals and bids may be opened, examir d and declared by the Secretary of this District prior to the presentation of said bids to the Board of Directors for its consideration. Section 2: That said proposals or bids shall be opened, examined and declared by the Secretary at a public meeting called by the Secretary for that purpose and said Secretary shall thereafter report the results of the bid- ding to this Board of Directors at the next regular meeting of this Board of Directors following the opening of said bids. ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this day of ~~--~~~-~~~ 1972. ATTEST: Chairman Secretary l CERTIFICATION 2 I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of COUNTY SANITATION 3 DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, California, do hereby certify that 4 the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted at a ---------~-~~ 5 regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District 6 No. 7 of Orange County, held on the ·---day of ·-------, 1972, 7 by the following vote of the members of the Board: 8 9 10 11 12 AYES: Directors NOES: ABSENT: and I further certify that , as Chairman ----~---~-~· ~---- , and 13 J. WA "YNE SYLVESTER, as Secretary, signed and approved said Resolution 14 15 16 17 18 on the day of , 1972. --------~---~ Secretary, County Sanitation District No. 7 19 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS. 20 County of Orange ) 21 I, J 0 WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of COUNTY SANITATION 22 DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, California, do hereby certify that 23 the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No.------- 24 passed and adopted by the Board of Di rectors of said County Sanitation Dis - 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 trict No. 7 of Orange County at a --------regular meeting the re of held on the day of --~ -~-- ' 1972. ·--- .. IN \VITNESS WHEREOF .. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official Seal of said District this ___ day of ________ . ' 1972. Secretary, County Sanitation District No. 7 of 0 range County LA.W OFFICES OF RIMEL, HARVEY & LOGAN FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MA.IN ST, 6A.NTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS O F ORANGE COUNTY, C ALIFORNIA P . 0. B O X 8 1 27. F O UNT A I N VAL L EY, CALIFORNIA 92708 1 0844 E L L I S AVENUE (E U CLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) Gentlemen : Ap ril 7, 19 7 2 NOTICE OF SPECI AL MEETI NG DISTRICT MO. 3 We dnes d ay , 6 :30 p .m., Apri.l 1 2 , 1 972 1 0844 El l is Avenue Fountain Va lley , Califo r nia TELEPHONES: A REA C OD E 714 5 4 0 -2910 962 -2 411 I am calling a special meet i ng of the Board of Directors of County Sc..nitatio11 District No . 3 a t the above hour a.nd date , immediate ly preceding the r egular ,Jo.int Meet ing , to consider the followi ng : JWS: r b (a) Consideration o f consolidation of Di s trict No . 3 and District No . 4 (b) Discuss ion conc=rning request of Beard Deve~opment Company to serve a 20 -acre area of land adjacen ~ to Distric~ No . 3 p r oposed to be annexe d to the Ci ty o f Long Beach -d.· A c. 0_ o-·------- NOTE: REF ER TO NO T I CE OF P.EGU LAR ,JO I NT MEE T I NG FOR MA PS OF DE TO UR NECESSARY TO EN TER PLANT NO . l I II II BOARDS OF DIRECTOR S County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box -8127 10844 El lis Avenue Fou ntain Valley, Ca !iF., 92703 of Orange County, California ( 1) (2) (3) ( 4) (5) (6) ( 7) r\ICTDlrT h.1- LJl.J I 1\1 ~I I ~U. Roll Call Special Meeting;_ April 12, 1972 -6:30 p.m. Appointment of Chairman pro t ern , if n e cessary Report of General Manager Report of General Counsel AGENDA f.\~1J'Qt..'RNMHJTS 1P03.T:r!l ,;;:- .COi'f.,P & MIUAGE .... W.:::: ... f iU:.S $H IJP ......... L.,, .. m;.S OlUTJONS GE~TlflED ,,: bElTERS WR ITIEN ... ::'.: .... ,..,. MINUTES WRITI EN ......... .- MINUTES ~I LED ............ ,,.... Co nsideration of propo sed consolidation of Districts Nos. 3 and 4 Discus sion conc erning request of Beard Deve l opment Comp any to serve a 20-acre area of land adjacent to District No . 3 proposed to be annexed t o the City of Long Beach Consideration of motion to a djourn1~1· (s) ~/p_G . . v"1...u ~.~~~- /! _ IJ : I .11-, t<-} c.; 1· .vf ,,r:_,(q '-VV->A ~ ~L,..,____ v ( II , I ,!-.~A~L~t5~R'S AG~ ... :J A .• ~?OL1T Co uniy Sanita,ion D:z trid~ Cit Ora nge Co 1Jniy, Cal!forni ti ISTRICT NO. Special Meeting -----o;-30 p .m. April 12> 1 9 72 P. 0 . Box 5 175 1084l f Ell is Avenue Fou ntain Vall ey, Cal i F., 92708 Telephones: Ar ea Code 71 4 540-2910 9 62 -2411 1 . Propos ed Cons?lidat ion of Districts Nos. 3 a.nd 4 . The staff has r·ecei ved the enc l osed l etter f rom th e Ci ty Manage:r of the C:ity of Seal Beach_, dated Ap r il 4 _, 1 972_, addrensed to our Ge neral Counse l . Th e Seal Beac h Ci t y Manager h aB supplied info r mati on concerning the financial irnplicntions o f the Redeve l opment Age ncy Pro j ect wi t h r egard t o the proposed consolidati on of Di s t rict No . J~ and. District No . 3 . Chairman Hyde h a s c a lled a speciaJ meeting of Distric t No . 3 and has inv ited the Doa1·d of D:Lrectors o f Sanitation Distric t No . 4 to mee t jointly at 6 :30 p .m.> Wednesday , Ap ril 1 2th _, to d isc u s s the currently proposed condition s and c onsiderations f l n:' consolidation . 2 . Discussi on re: Sewer Service for 20 Acre s in Lo n g Beach . - This ite m ha s Leen placed on the s p ecial meeting a gen da for di scussion and corrnnent b y t he Di rec to r s if t i me p e r r.ojt s b efo r e the Joi n t Boa rd meeting . This s a me i t em appear s in the Joi nt Meet i ng busine 3s as Age n da It em Noo 12 a nd No. 1 3< (See pages F -1, F --2 a n d F -3 in t he Joint Meet:i.ng agf'n da ). FAH : j En cJ.o sure s F r ed A. Ha rper Ge n e ral Man age r ' -~ • -· --·-. ---· # ..... .:..-· __ .:..._ •• •• _,_.;.._ •"··-""-ll---.....;.,.....~._.;.; .. ..;..,•::__. ___ ;; •····J•'-"••• ~····-r-.•..:, -·--·--·-~r•""-· •.1~.';--->• ··-··---··-·°'••'·• ----·~ .... -_ .... _.~~.:--•...#'-•...-,,;,~~;;..--•--••o.:.j._ ........ -···i•t - 1' .. pril 4, 1972 Mr. Arthur C. Nissen, Attorney 2014 ~orth Broadway Santa Ana, California 92702 Dear Mr., Nissan: Reference is made to the proposed consolidation agreement and my letter of March 2, 1972, -to Mr. I'red Harper, General Manager, Joint Sanitation Districts. In response to questions that arose during the joint meeting of the sanitation districts, we wish to add the follov.ring information concerning the effects of the over- all consolidation and the financial implications of the Redevelop- ~ent Agency project. The Riverfront Redevelopment Project area constitutes 104 acres within the district boundaries of Sanitation District Four. Of this area, 54 acres are either existing public uses or are proposed to be acquired for public use. There are now 36 ac!.""es \·Ji thin t.he area that have been developed with 14 acres remaining for private development. The development that exists within the district is now composed of 141 single-family dwellings, 549 apartment units, and one service station. The balance of 14 acres yet to be developed, we anticipate will add 4_90 units on the basis of present zoning policy. In regard to the financial consideration of the Agency, only those funds for improvements or incr.ease in value accrue to the Agency. District Number Three tax rate of 47 cents will apply to the base value ($636,000 A.V.). The one-time consolidation fee includes all lands within the Agency in conformance with District Number Three policy. As proposed, in order to perfect our grant and com- plete the construction, our request for consolidation is to be effected on July 1, 1974. Recent trends indicate that state a~d federal regulations may soon require the direct collection of revenues for sewer service in the form of user charges. If this occurs in District Number Three, user charges would apply to t0e area within the Redevelopment Agency. Mr. Arthur c. Nissen, .Att6rney -2- In review of the financial consideration of the consolidation agree- ment we feel the funds collected from this consolidation will be adequate on the basis that (1) the District will not require major sewer improvement; (2) annual revenue of $122,000 derived from the $25,000,000 assessed valuation of District Number Four, using the 47 cent tax rate of District Number Three, should balance the esti- mated treatment costs; and (3) the district flows are primarily residential which should reflect lower treatment costs than the average of the joint districts. The overall financial effects of the Redevelopment Agency are more than balanced by the above factors and on the revenue that 'will be achieved. Very truly yours, THE CI'I'Y OF SEAL BEACH Dennis Courtemarche City Manager Copy to Mr. Fred Harper, General Manager, Joint Sanitation Districts .:¥.'•••-•-.:... _.,.,_.,._..;•_ ---•u•.--·-'-__ ..;,._,.__. ___ ....,. __ . ., .... __ ~ • Agenda item No. March 2, 1972 TO: Fred Harper, General Manager, Joint Sanitation Districts FROM: Dennis Courtemarche, City Manager, City of Seal Beach SUBJECT: Factors Related to the Proposed Consolidation of Orange County Sani ta ti on Districts Numbers Three and Four. --~ The following is a brief description of Sanifation District Number Four, the Redevelopment Agency which i!. in existence within District Number Four, and present plans to eliminate the District through its consolidation with Orange County Sanitation District Number Three. PHYSICl\1 __ u1grs_:__AS~ESS~O VALUE -~tl_P_F_LOW c~~RA~TERIST~_~_Q_f ___ D!STRICT #4 Presently, the total jurisdictional area of Sanitation District #4 is 2,844.7 acres. This includes 625.7 acres of land mass (all that area lying north of the mean high tide line) and 2,219 acres off shore. The mean high tide line is recognized as the separation point between State tidelands and the area subject to local control such as city and county. Orange County Sanitation* Districts• total gross assessed value is reported as being $27,050,656 with $6,851,760 of this lying off shore. Average daily flows during the oast year at the existing plant were as follows: January 1971 February March April May June July August September October November December January 1972 AVERAGE 1,087 ,526 l,034,395 1,056 ,907 1,065,585 1,069,741 1.,078,330 1,180,999 1,343,741 1,354 ,552 1,107,333 1,123,818 1,144,752 1,167,200 1,139,607 * This is in reference to Sanitation District No. 4 only. Mr. Fred Harper March 2, 1972 ~ page Two _____ . __ """"' . There has been no significant increase in average daily flow over the past several years. Since there is very little area in the District available for development, future AVD should not change aopreciably. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Seal Beach was formed on February 20, ·1967 under authority of the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California. The reason for establishing the Redevelopment Agency was to provide a method of financing of specific public improvements. The 11 Report to City Council for the Riverfront Redevelopment Plan" dated January 31, 1969, listed the improvements as (1) Sewer Treatment Plant, (2) Electric Avenue Improvements, (3) Marina Park and Community Facility and (4) First Street Extension. Item (3) is complete. Item (4) has become a city financed project. Item (1) is dependent on an acceptable agreement of consolidation and successful clean water grant application. Once the aforementioned public improvements have been accomplished and all Agency debts have been repaid, the need for the Agency should no longer exist. The Redevelopment Agency project area consists of 104 acres, 54 of which are either in public use or are slated for public use. 36 acres within the project area have been developed by the private sector with 14 acres remaining to be similarly developed. An important point with reference to the Redevelopment Agency's impact on other taxing jurisdictions is that the basic purpose of the Agency is to take low value land and convert it to high value land. To quote Eugene Jacobs, one of the foremost authorities on Redevelopment Agency Law in the State and who is presently on retainer to more than twenty such agencies, 11 The best thing that can happen to the school districts ... and to the county .•. would be to have the areas which are blighted ... the areas which ar~ not producing taxes, and have those areas start producing taxes ... and therefore increase the a re as a round them. 11 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION It is proposed to cons~idate the District #4 sewage collection system with District #3 by constructing a waste water interceptor originating at the existing Seal Beach sewage treatment facility and terminating at the District #3 pump station at Westminster Avenue and Seal Beach Boulevard. Mr. Fred Harper March 2, 1972 Page Three The project provides for abandonment and demolition of District #4's treat- ment plant discharging into the San Gabriel Flood Control Channel. It would thereby eliminate an existing waste discharge and promote region- wide coordination of sewage disposal. The project plans and specifications have been approved and certified by the State Division of Water Quality Control. A grant award will be presented to the City of Seal Beach and Sanitation District #4 in the near future as a result of letters of intention to consolidate from Sanitation Districts Numbers Three and Four to Environ- mental Protection Agency. However, no funds will be disbursed until the Environmental Protection Agency has received a copy of the approved consolidation agreement. SUMMARIZED CONSOLIDATION AGREEMENT At meetings of the Seal Beach City Council, Sanitation District #4, and Redevelopment Agency of Seal Beach held on February 28, 1972, an agreement consolidating Sanitation Districts Numbers Three and Four was unanimously approved by the three participating parties. It is being forwarded to Sanitation District #3 for their consideration. The salient features of the agreement are as follows: 1. 2. 3. Consolidation is effective on July 1, 1974. The consolidation fee is based on District #3's Resolution 72-6-3; namely, $630 per acre applied to a land mass or service area of 625.7 acres. District #4 will pa¥ District #3 an amount equal to six per cent (6%) per annum of the consolidation fee from the date of recordation with the Secretary of State to the effective date of consolidation, July 1, 1974. ,/1 -. ~--I: . .. //;' }llLtc.,~l {_~~<-~ lz.c:e-<.l<.. .z ( /....__v.___ DenniSCourtemarche· DC :mjs MEET I NG DATE _.....;4..._-_11-_-1..:.....L.:::::_____ T I ME _ __.:::_~-'-·, ~_o__ D I ST R I CT s -~--~---- DISTRIC T 1 (HERRIN).···. GR I SET (C ASP~RS ) .. ··BATTIN (coco) ...... ·M ILLER PORTER DJCTRICT 2 Tt-h-lE~AN ) .... SMITH (ROOT) ........ CHRISTIE (JACKSON) .... CLA RK ) ROB T CULVER (GOMEZ) ...... FINNELL (GR I SET).·· .. HERRIN (HA RPER) ..... JUST (CASPE RS ).· .. PHILLIPS (ZUNIGA) ..... SI MS (DUTTO N) ..... STEPHENSON (MACHADO) .... WEDAA (SCHNIEPP). ··WINN DISTRICT 3 ~f>- KROESEN · · · · HYDE / _=e::::: " CASPER S).··. BATTIN -./----'li!.. WEST~A). ····BERTON / pJ,· v ROOT).······ CHRISTIE 1·.61) v --y JACK SON). · · · CL.A.RKJ ROBT / ~+ h wf:Jl._ CULVER / (FONTE).····· DAVIS ~ ----,/- (MC CRAC KEN ). GREEN -r ----r/- (JUST). • • • • • • HARPER i·.lfo ./ JZ--../- (KANEL). ·····HARVEY ~ ---U: (GR I SET).···· HE RRIN --Y---___L_ (LEWIS).····;· HE MEON "'£".> v Q;r--./ (BA RNES)· · · · · HOL DE N ./ ----Y MC WHINNEY /--"T --; ~ '~ (zuN IGA) ..... s IM S 1 · r'~ --6/ (' tr"'"' (DUTTON).···· STEPHENSON . v == _..1_ o: DISTRICT 5 PARSONS CASPERS ( CROUL) · ..... HIRTH DISTRICT 6 PORTER CASPERS (HIRTH) ...... MC INNIS DISTRICT 7 (coco) .. )'' .. MILLER (CASPER S .... CLA RK ) RALPH ------ (HERRIN) ..... GR I SE T === === === PORTER (FI SCH ~AC H) .. QUIGLEY (HIRTH) ...... ROGERS (1 .. EMAN) .... SMITH DISTRICT 11 (MC CRACl<EN). SH I PL EY (CASPE RS) .... BAKER COEN DISTRICT 8 (GOLD BERG) ... BOYD CA SPERS MITCHELL JO I NT EOP.R.DS (HARPE R).·· .. JUST (CASPE RS). ···BAKER (CASPE RS) .... BA TTIN (WESTRA) .. ···BERTON CA SPERS !ROOT)······ ·CHRISTIE JACK SON ).·· ·CL ARK) RO BT CASPER S) ... ·CLA RK ) RALPH COEN CULVE.R (FONTE).· ····DAVIS (GOMEZ) ..... ·FINNELL (FISCHBACH) .. QLJIGLEY (MC CR ACKEN ) ·GRE EN (HERRI N).··· ·GRISET (JUST) ...... ·HARPER (KANEL). ·····HARVEY (LEWIS).···· ·HE MEON (GRISET) ·····HERRIN (CROUL) ······HIRTH (HOGARD) ·····HO LDE N (KROES~N) ····HYDE (HIRTH)·· ····MC INNIS MC WHINNEY (coco) ...... ·MILLER PARS ON S (CASPERS)··· ·PHILLIPS PORTER (HIRTH) · · · · · ·RO GERS (Mc CRACKEN) ·SHIPLEY (ZUNIGA)···· ·SI MS (HILE MAN)··· ·SM ITH (DUTTON)·· ···STEPHEN SON (MACHADO) .... WEDAA (SCH NIEP P) ... WI NN * * * * MITCHELL (GOLDBERG).~.BOYD QillffiS_ HARPER ./ BROWN ~ SYLVESTER ~ .LEWIS -r DUNN CLARKE ~ SIGLER NISSON --Y- CRA BB ~ BROWN ~ TAYLO R CARLSON FINSTER GALLO WAY HOHENER 1! 1 HO\'/ ARD t:.{~l · 1 1 f HUNT j I 4 . KE I TH t1 f}!} BOETT~E R /1Jr.· ~· LYN CH MADDOX MARTINSON ~y--r ~ MURO NEY .tt-c.•(! PIERSALL , t rf ~ )llu 1,,;J /c.tt S TEV EN~ d _._ rJt. t (P>''v ) "f,> ~ J).9.A , Ck u.:.l ~ ~ + <..} 11 ( -l~>lu~ l~ Q~'«• ~ . ~ , ..... ~ MEETING DATE--------TIME-----DI STRIC TS -------- DISTRICT l JOINT BOARDS (HERRIN) .. ·· .GRI S ET (CASP(:RS). ···BATTIN (coco) ...... ·MILLE R PORTER DJ~TRICT 2 TPr'!"(E ~AN) •••• SMITH (ROOT) ..•.•.• CHRISTIE (JACKSON) ••.• CLARK) ROBT CULVER (GOMEZ) ••.•.• FINNELL (GRISET). • ••• HERRIN (HARPE R).·· •• JUST (CASPE RS ) •.•• PHILLIPS (ZUNIGA) •••..• SIMS (DUTTON) •••.. STEPHENSON (MACHADO) ••. · WEDAA (SCHNIEPP). ··WINN (HARPER)····· JUST ___ _ (CASPERS).·.· BAKER ___ _ (CASPERS)··· ·BATTIN ___ _ (WESTRA)····· BERTON ___ _ CASPERS ___ _ iROOT) ·······CHRISTIE ___ _ JACKSON)···· CLAR K) ROBT ___ _ ------CASPERS)··· ·CLARK) RALPH ___ _ ------COEN ___ _ ------CULVER ___ _ ------(FONTE)····· ·DAVIS ___ _ ------(GOMEZ) .. ··• ·FINNELL ___ _ ------(FISCHBACH)· .QUIGLEY ___ _ ----.--(MC CRACKEN) ·GRE·EN ___ _ ------(HERRIN)···· ·GR I S ET ___ _ ------(JUST)······ ·HARPER ___ _ ------· (KANEL) ······HARVEY ___ _ ------(LEWIS)····· ·HEMEON ___ _ ------. (GRI SET) ·····HERRIN ___ _ DISTRICT 3 (~o 11 i.: l:d ()ho1 (CROUL) .•... ·HIRTH ___ _ --/ !HOGARD) • · • • ·HOLDE N --. __ (KROESENf ···HYDE v --__ l _ KROES(:N) ·.···HYDE ___ _ (CASPERS).··· BATTIN ~ --~ HIRTH).···· ·MC INNIS ___ _ (WEST~A). ····BERTON v ·:-~~ __ ---S MC WHINNEY ___ _ (RO .OT) ..••••• CHRI _ST I E ... )o ~--t? (coco) ...... ·MILLER ---- (JACK SON).··· CLARK) ROBT __1L. --PARS ON S ____ _ CULVER ~ --(CASPERS)··· ·PHILLIPS __ -- (FONTE).····· DAVIS _LL_ --_a_ PO RTER ___ _ (MC CRACKEN). GREEN _IL.. --__.lL' (HIRTH)···.•· ·ROGERS ___ _ (JUST) .•.•.•• HARPER b : !.JO -lL---__JL_ (Mc CRAC KEN) ·SHIPLEY ---- (KANEL)· ·····HARVEY ~~ --_a_ (ZUNIGA)··· ···SIMS ---- (GR I SET)····· HERRIN --~ (HILEMAN)··· ·SMITH ---- (LEWIS).····· HEMEON ~ --~ (DUTTON).··· ·STEPHENSON ---- (BARNE S )····· HOLDEN ~ ----£7 (MACHADO) .•.. WEDAA ---- MC WHINNEY ~ ~ -J,L_ (SCHNIEPP) .•• WINN ---- (ZUNIGA)····· SIMS a..V~·---'3- (DUTTON). ····STEPHENSON _t.L... __ :JZ DISTRICT 5 PARSONS CASPERS (CROUL) ••• • • • HIRTH DISTRICT 6 PORTER CASPERS (HIRTH) ••••.• MC INNIS DISTRICT 7 (coco) .. )' ... MILLER ------ (CASPERS ..•. CLARK) RALPH ____ -- (HERR JN) •.••• GR I SET ____ -- PORTER _____ _ (FISCH ~ACH) .• QUIGLEY _____ _ (HIRTH) ..•••• ROGERS ____ -- (~· .EMAN) •••• SMITH ____ -- DISTRICT 11 (MC .CRAC KEN). SH I PLEY (CASPERS) ..•• BA KER COEN DISTRICT 8 (GOLDBERG) .•• BOYD CASPERS MITCH EL L * * * * MITCHELL (GOLDBERG) .•. BOYD OTHERS -r--/Y) lA\ rt f\ ~ \ c\ C z t~ C'ev-K HARPER BROWN SYLVESTER LEWIS ~~~~" SA.\.-\3.'::> DUNN t~~J CLA RKE c,·tv A +to v~ey s I G~ER .. -I ( 2 ) N I S .... 0 N ~ · CRABB () BROWN TAYL OR CARLSON FIN STER GAl_LOWAY HOH EN ER HOWARD HUNT KEITH BOETTNER LYNCH MADDOX MARTIN SON MU RONEY PIER SAL L STEVE NS ., DISTRICT NO . 3 -April 1 2, 1972 , 6:30 p .m. #5 -Considerat i on of proposed conso l idation of Districts Nos . 3 & 4 Nisson -Reported on discussion re in-lieu fee for areas within District re-development district instead of situation where new deve l opments in District do not pay any tax for the peri od of the re-development program . The redevelopment program is set for a 15 -year payout and could go for a maximum of 30 years . This infor- mation was passed on to District 4 and they feel this is not a reasonable request for an in-l ieu fee and exp l ained why : The redeve l opment area is 104 acres -all within District 4; 54 acres are proposed to be required for pub l ic use ;36 acres have been deve l oped; 14 acres remaining for private deve l opment. Development with District is composed of 1 41 single dwe l lings and 524 apartment units and 1 service station . There are p l ans for the 1 4 acres to add 490 units under present zoning policy . Re financial situ ation, only those funds for improvements ~r increased value accrue to the redevelopment agency . District 3 tax rate, which is p r esently 47¢, would apply to the existing valueswi..thin redevelop- ment agency which assessed value is $636,000 . As part of the agreement for consolidation , District 4 will pay a one-time fee which is equal to a norma l annexa t ion fee for District 3 . The consol i dation is to become effective J uly 1, 197 4, and financia l conditions are worked out to that time . TheFe may be, instead of District property taxes in the future, some form of user charges. Would charge users so Jnuch for a certain period of time. Charges would apply to existing and new development . District 4 feels that in considering the overall picture, t h ese things should be considered : District 4 , as part of District 3 , will not require any major sewer improvements . District 4 comes in without any liabilities to District 3. Annua l revenue of $122 ,000 will be derived based on existing tax rate . This amount willmore than balance treatment costs and capital improve - ments for this portion of Dist . 3 . District 4 flows are primarily residential so treatment costs for residential sewage are lrkely to be less than normal ba l ance of Dist . 3 . In effect , District 4 feels that request f or i n -lieu tax for new developments withi n redevelopment district would not be a resonable request in that new projects are going to be developed and will have to pay redevelopment agency back themselves . The idea behind redevelopment agency is that by use of the f u nds, the area within Seal Beach will improve more rapidly and to a higher degree than it would have without redevelopment agency and assessed valuation of area would be higher . #3 p . 2 Holden -District 4 has no bonded indebtedness and District 3 has a large one. Dist . 4 will be assuming part of that when they join. FAH -$636,000 of assessed valuation would be accrued to District 3 and would bring Dist. $3,000 annually. Number of dwelling units in area based on letter received would be about 180 and average homeowner pays about $25 a year. Not sufficient funds generated within area to pay for treatment of the wastes, but this is offset by other circumstances such as the assessed valuation of the area out in ocean which District 3 collects taxes on and provides no service . Dist . 3 has been receiving grants and anticipates getting at least two more in the near future. From overall area District should not be sub - sidizing the total area in any way except redevelopment agency area will be subsidized. Blackman -Have a sewer plant of our own and one of the goa l s of Sea l Beach and rest of county is to improve sewage treatment and meet upcoming federal and state standards that are filtering down . They can hand l e problem in Seal Beach themselves if they have to but national concept is much more efficient and allows removal of plan that needs some updating. As a result of that , we will §trongly that this will help our area and fits in with new concept coming out as far as treatment goes . City Manage~ -Total project costs exceed $1 -1/2 mi l lion and with consolidation we will be accomplishing a major task without any increase to taxpayers in District 4 . That's why redevelopment ~agency exists and why they want consolidation . Specific assessed valuation of that portion of District at sea wi l l not be a burden on Dist . 3 - $6 ,180,000. Nisson -As far as District 3 is concerned, they will not pick up any additional bonded indebtedness but do pick up an additional $25,000 worth of assessed valuation . McWhinney -Would you recommend going ahead with merger if you were representing just District 3? FAH -Yes~ I would. Blackman -Purpose of redevelopment agency is to direct development with a plan. Hyde -Will users tax apply only to 549 apartments if area developed? or to homes also? FAH -Would apply everywhere. Ad valorem tax should go down then . Will still appear on tax but as a user charge . MATTER OF RECORD: Culver -I have heard attorneys mention that thereare no major trunk lines to be constructed in this area. Is this a guarantee and if so, for how long? City Manager -They expect no development in this area as far as commercial, etc. and are not planning for any . #3 p . 3 City Manager -Understand that there would not be a property tax based on assessed valuation but user tax would be in place of assessed valuat i on property tax . Hyde -What wou l d be rate with i n redeve l opment a g ency -47¢? Yes ? -What if 490 units were added right now? FAH -Would have to pay the 47¢ tax whatever the assessed valuation . Total area of Dis tri ct 4 pays the freight and the r edeve l opment agency is a n inequity within that Distri ct . Hyde -If there was no redeve l opment agency , would would they do? FAH -Would be annexed at th e same annexat i on fee and the ·-47¢ wou l d app l y and any increased asses sed valuation charge would beapplied . Ba t tin -Is in-lieu fee because redevelopment agency wo u ld be off tax r o l ls for a period of time? Nissen -That was the purpose but the who l e of District 4 more than makes up the difference . Battin -How long will development agency be off tax rolls? Nisson -Forecast i s 1 5 years -can go up to 30 years . I f development does take place , additional time would not be necessary . Once development takes place, the property wou l d be on the tax rolls . Property is not off tax rells but is on the tax rolls with the assessed valuation in effect--just the increased tax valuations do rot apply . There are tax monies flowing from area . Availability for federa l and state assistance wou l d be greater with consolidated Districts than if they were not consol idated. On ce t h e l and is developed , property goes back on ax ro l ls to fu l l assessed val uation . Holden -This is established in policy of both council and redevelopment agency . City Manager -Is automatic ; no structure to keep off tax rolls for more than 1 5 to 30 years. Bl ackman -Project area is limi ted by law and doesn 't expand or change over the time . Small area in comparison to whole District . CONSOLIDATION was moved and seconded . FAH added one point -In conso l idation agreement a charge of $30 per mi llion gallon s was set up and this is less than District~ costs . Should be changed to whatever District 's costs are . ADDED to mot i on : District 4 should pay the actual cost of discharge of wastes . Nissen -Should have unanimous vote of ~all District 3 Directors: Roll Cal l Vote was taken and had one vote against -Battin; motion d i d not carr y . , ' #3 p . 4 McWhi n ney -Made subst i tute motion to put consolidation on next month 's Agenda . Mot i on passed. Cu l ver -Requested that his question and t h e answer with regard to additional trunk lines be made a "matter of record ". #6 -Sewering of 20 -acre area of l and ad j acent to Dist . 3 proposed to be annexed to City of Long Beach . Requested by Beard Deve l opment Company . Separated from Long Beach by two bodies of water. Development Company wants to discharge their wastes to u s . Cost + 1 0% approach has been used in other Districts i n serving area outside District boundaries . Hyde -Notice District 4 1 s charge is $630 per acre . This wo u ld be fair + 10%(?) Recommended that contractual arrangement '~be made with Cit~ of fung· Beach if you desire to serve this area . An unanswered question is how do they get from their development to the District 's facilities? FAH -Not too much of our concern but wou l d have to be accomplished . Development Engineer -About 180 single family units are concerned . Hyde ·-Where wou l d we pick it up? FAH -Need pump station and force main and line to be constructed to our Seal Beach Blv d . Pump Station . Deve l oper would construct sewer on Westminster Blvd . according to requirements at no expense to City of Seal Beach or to District . Operation of sewer line will be at the expense of the homeowners , plus pay the District 's c charges which would be equal to what they would normally pay if they we re in Dist. 3 + 10 %. Flow -100 ,000 gallons per day . Doesn 't appear to be any way of making exhange of service with LA Co . Sanitation -area not within LA Sanitat i on Districts . Chairman recommended that this item be deferred until more information can be obtained. Engineer -Initiated this back in January and in discussions with Mr . Harper he suggested tha:t Mey hold variou s meetings and Mr . Harp e r was authorized to proceed with discussions with them . They are at a point where they need to go forward or not go forward . Would like to answer any questions right now . Holden -Said letter i ndicated they weren 't going to give us any trouble . Culver -Asked if we are the onl y ones who can serve them . FAH -Yes , according to letter . Jim Beard -Long Beach facilities are located across two bridges and would be very difficult for construction needed just for 120 acre area . Nisson -Suggested a vote be taken as to principle of servicing and if passes, submi t contract to Beard Deve l opment #3 p . 5 Herrin -Asked Mr . Harper if he saw any potential problem here . FA H -Be l ieves i t is acceptab l e to accep t t h is on the basis of annexation fee + 1 0%. Wi ll be dealing wi t h City of Long Beac h and not other public entities , and contractual arrangements can be worked out. Could be done by annexation but ;do not recommend this . Recommends contractual arrangement. Holden -Moved that staff have contract ready for approval or disapproval for ne~t : meeting . Motion passed . Meeting adjourned 7:31 p.m.