Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972-03-21COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFl,;JRNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) March 17, 1972 TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 TO: MEMi3ERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SArJITATION DISTRICT NO~ 7 Gentlemen: Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting held r.'iarch 3. 1972, the Board of Directors of County ~anitation District No. 7 will meet in an adjourned regular meeting: JWS:gc Tuesday, March 21, 1972 at 5:00 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley~ California BO ARDS OF DI RE CTORS County San ita t ion Districts P. 0 . Bo x 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 (1 ) (2) (3) me ... JL./tt 4) LETI EA •• t/...- A/C .... TKLR ~5) .... -.... -.. -.. .............. ---~ .I FILE ·······-··-7 imeJ .§J ..... - A/C '7. •. TKL R":".'.. (7) DISTRICT No. 7 • Adjourned Regular Meeting March 2 1 , 1 972 -5 :00 p .m. Roll Call Appo i ntment of Chainnan pro tern, i f necessary Report of General Manager Report of Gen eral Counsel AGENDA ADJOURNMENTS posvf CO MP & MILEAGE .... 7 •• - FILES SET UP ....... V. .......... . r R ESO[QT~NSL.ERTI F~ LETIERS ~JRI TTEN ...... :·····/'"' MI NUTES WRI TTEN .... .k:".'"7 MINUi ES HLED ...... L,..L" .• Report of staff and consulting engineers on proposed sewerage facilities to serve portions of the Orang e Park Acres area wi tl'l'in the City of Orange . See page "A" Consideration of Resolution No . 72 -4 1-7, ordering annexat ion of te rritory to the District (Proposed Chapman East Annexation, Annexation No . 25 to County Sanitation District No . 7). See p age "B" Consideration of action on proposed Assessment District No . 9 , (Proc eedings may be ref er r ed to special counsel for the ass essme nt district, if desired . Copies of resolution will be distributed to Directors at mee ting time .) FILE _/ - LETIER ."fl.~- Consi de r ation of Reso lution No . 72 -42-7, declaring intention to order the construction of sanitary sewer s and appurtenances and appurtenant works in propos ed Assessment District No . 9 ; and fixing April 1 2 , 1 972 at -7-: 3D ~m . in District 1 s office as the time and place fo r --ti.earing of objections FILE _L._ lETTE R •• .V-'--:- A/ C ~.Titl " 1 s ) ---....... -~ ---- A/C ': •. TKLR .::: to said work and improvement . 7'.C-0 Discussion of proposed Ord inance No ~ 71 5 , amending Ordinance No . 711 . See page "C" (9) Othe r business and communication~ if any (10) Consideration of mo tion to adjourn .. CITY OF P .O. BOX 449 300 EAST CHAPMAN AVENUE TELEPHONE 633-2300 ORANGE. CALIFORNIA g2666 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS- ENG INEERING DIV ISION February 15, 1972 . r:llEO Irr .the Offlce of the Secretary f.J~o:_nty qnl'tailon District Mr. Fred A. Harper General Mana ge r FEB 29 1972 - County Sanitation Di stric ts of Oran ge County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California ~~~.~~ Re : Dear Mr. Harp e r: Propos e d Sewerage Facilities (Hand y Cre e k Alignme nt) Enclo sed, are three (3 ) route s tudies for the propo se d sewe r age facili- tie s in the Ora nge Park Acres Area . At thi s time , the city has had t wo (2) requests to provide sewera ge faciliti e s to both locations "A" and "B" as s hown on the area maps . Th re e (3 ) ali g nm e nt" s tudie s have been made with the portions s h ade d in "ye llow" d e linea ting th e area s that wo uld be exclud ed from se rvic e via g ravity flow sewe r s . Th e city i s propo s ing to construct Rout e 1 at an estimated cost of $220,000.00. The estimated cost for Route 2 is $408,000.00 and a t the pre - sent tim e , th ere h as b een no est imate prepare d for Route 3 . We ·a re asking the Di s tri ct's c onun ents as to wh e t he r thi s fac i l ity would eventua lly be in- cluded und e r the Di s tr1.ct's jurisdiction whe n the Di s trict b oundaries a re revised. As th e fina l d esign progresses, we will be coordinating all line sizing and final p lan preparation wi th your office . Pl ease r eview these route s tudi es a t your conve n ienc e a nd l e t our office know if the Di s trict is in concurrence with our proposal. JVF:RSL :hy cc : City En g ineer Encl. Agenda It e m #5 IN CORP O RATE D APR I L G, t oe e -A- oy tru~;v7 , /14f, i, /i;, di-./ /")'John V. Fonl e y . -~ ,"_,/ Dir ec tor of Public~orks •/ Di s t r ic t 7 RESOLUTION NO. 72-41-7 APPROVING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE ·DISTRICT (Annexation No. 25) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT "PROPOSED CHAPMAN EAST ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7" *·* ~ * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Fonnation Commission for annexation of territory to County Sanitation District No. 7, ~Y means of a petition filed I with said Corrunission by the property owner; and, Section 2. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Proposed Chapman East Annexation -Annexation No. 25", the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and, Section 4. That the reason for annexing said territory is to provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and, Section 5. That annexation fees in.the amount of $3,512.88 have been received; and, Section 6. That, as. authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Corrunission pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code, Section 56261, the territory herinbefore referred to and described hereinabove, be and it is hereby ordered annexed to County .sanitation District No. 7. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned meeting held March 21, 1972. Agenda. Item #6 -B-District 7 II II COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. a. sax 8127. F'OUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIF'ORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) March 13, 1972 Sent to: All Cities in District No. 7 Costa Mesa Sanitary District All Industries in District 7 with I.W. Permits Orange County Building Dept. Mr. C. Arthur Nissen TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 Subject: Notification of Intention to Amend Ordinance No. 711 County Sanitation District No. 7 In accordance with Ordinance No. 711, Article 18, this letter will constitute your formal notification of the intention of the County Sanitation District No. 7 Board of Directors to consider an amendment to said Ordlnance. In this regard, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 will consider, on April 12, 1972, adoption of Ordinance No. 715. ~he principal· change will be an increase in the fee for multiple dwellings to the maximum charge under Ordinance No. 712 of $250 per unit. Also included in this amend- ment is a clarification indicating that hotels and motels will be classified as "commercia.l or inclustrial" and subject to the applicable rates for that category. Any comments on the proposed change should be directed to Mr. Robert Webber, Chief of the Industrial and Permit Division, 540-2910, prior to April 1, 1972. /~/1 ~ Ray~-Lewi· Deputy Chief Engineer REL:RAW:hja Agenda Item #8 -c-District 7 MEMORANDUM To: FRED A. HARPER GENERAL MANAGER From: ROBERT A. WEBBER CHIEF OF INDUSTRIAL & PERMIT DIVISION COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 1084-4 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 Subject: MODIFICATION OF ARTICLE 18, DISTRICT'S UNIFORM CONNECTION AND USE ORDINANCE During the March 8th Joint Boards Meeting it was suggested that in conjunction with the escalation of District No. 7 connection charges the Uniform Connection and Use Ordinance be also amended, thereby eliminating the required notification to industrial waste discharge permittees of proposed Ordinance amendments· .. As you will recall, during the formation of the Connection and Use Ordinance this provision was requested by industry with specific reference to modification in use charges or in discharge requirements that would significantly effect their operation. It was industries feeling that should modifications to the Ordinance be contemplated by the Districts, they should be given the opportunity to review and possibl~ comffient on the proposed revisions. As this appears to be a reasonable request, I feel the elimination of this provision may damage the excellent rapport the Districts currently enjoy with the business community. 3/15/72 cc: Clifton Miller ·~ C. Arthur Niss on Agenda Item #8 -C-1-District 7 II MANAGER'S AGE~H>A REP ORT II Cou nty Sanitation Di str icts of Orange Cou nty, Cali fornia DISTRICT NO. _7_ Adjourned Regular Meet i ng March ·21 , 1 972 -5:00 p .m. P. 0. Box 5175 10844 ~llis Aven ue Founblin Voll ey, Co li f., 92708 Tele phones : Area Code 714 540-2910 962-241 I The following is an explanation of the more important non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and wb i c h are not otherwise self-explanatory . · ************************ Item No. 5 -Proposed Sewerage Facilities f or the Orange Park ·- Acres area. The staff h as b een revi ewing the three alternate a lignments propose d by the Ci ty of Orange for construction of sewerage facil i ties to serve portions of the Orange Park Acres area within the Ci ty. Before Tuesday 1 s s chedul ed Board meeting the staff and engineers will have a meeting wi th staff personnel from the City to agree on the desired alignment which wil l provide the best service to the are a a t the least cost . The staff will be prepared to review the ma tte r in depth at the meeting . Item No . 6 -Proposed Chapman East Annexation (Anne xation No . 25). This proposed annexation to District has been approved by the Local Agency F ormation Commission and the annexat i on fees authorize d by the Boa.rd for this annexation have been rece i ved . Resolution No. 72 -41 -7 ordering the annexation of territory to the Di strict is recommended by the staff for approval . Item No. 7 -Proposed Assessment District No . 9 . The special counsel and engineers f or Assessment Dis trict No . 9 have prepared the necessary legal documents and t he c on - struction drawi n gs to begin the formal p roce edings fo r the formati on of Assessment Distri ct No . 9. I t is recommended that the Resolution of Intention No . 7 2 -42-7 fixing April :].2th as the t i me and place for hearing of objections fo r the work and imp r ovements to be compl eted within Assessment District No . 9 , be approved . Ite m No . 8 -Di s c us sion of Proposed Ordi nan ce No . 71 5 Incre as ing Conn ecti on Char ges for Mu ltiple Dwe llings . At t he March 8th Joint Board meeti ng t he Ge n e r al Co unse l advi sed t hat t he rec ently adopted Ordi n ance No . 714 amendin g the Di s t r i ct Connection Charge Ordinance was n o t in compliance with Art icle 18 _, Procedures for Amendmen t_,.of t h e Di str ict Conne c t i o n Ch arge Ordinance which requires p r i o r n otification to p e rm ittees and con c erned citi es of int e nti on t o cons ide r ?Jll endme nts . Attached to the agenda i s a not i ce of i ntenti on t o amend t he Ord inance_, dat ed March 13th, which was sen t t o all penni tte es and c o n ce r ned citi es . Also attached is a s t aff memoran dum f rom t he Chief of our Industrial and Permit Di v i s i on exp r epsing c oncern about possible change s to the Ordi nance regarding r e quired notification to industrial waste di scharge permittees o f proposed o r d i nance runendments in t he f u t u r e . The p urpose of this discussion is to provide the Genera l Counsel wiih d i rection to p r epar e a new o r dinance for con s ide r ation b y the Boar d i n Ap ril. -.. -.... --~'• STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY RONALD RE.AGAN, Governor STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD nrVISION OF WATER QUALITY CONTROL ~OM 1 UO, RESOURCES BUILDING U16 NINTH STREET • SACRAMENTO 95814 March 3, 1972 NOTICE TO AGENCIES SEEKING CLEAN WATER GRANTS Many of you have been anxiously awaiting the final determi- nation by the Cost of Living Council regarding the exemption of charges and fees for water and sewage disposal services by the federal, state, and local governments. Attached are new exemptions effective January 26, 1972, which reflect changes in the 1971 amendments of the Economic Stabilization Act. Please note that you may now implement new or increased sewer user charges in connection with your Revenue Program since such adjustments are clearly exempt from economic stabilization controls. Sincerely yours, ~ John Olaf N~~ Assistant Division Chief Manager -Grants for Clean Water Attachment , ............. "TITLE 6 CHAPTER 1 PART 101 "SUBPART D 101. 31 KEY EXCERPTS FROM: ECONOMIC STABILIZATION COST OF LIVING COUNCIL COVERAGE, EXEMPTIONS, AND CLASSIFICATION OF ECONOMIC UNI TS " -Exemptions General Items not included in coverage Price adjustments and pay adjustments with aregard to the property services, wages, and salaries set forth in this subpart are exempt from and not included in the coverage of this title:' "101.34 Certain price adjustments (a) Federal, state, and local governments." II ( 2) Price adjustments by state and local governments for any work, service, publica- tion, report, document, benefit, privilege, authority, use, franchise, license, permit, certification, registration, facilities, materials, or similar thing of value or utility, performed, furnished, provided, granted, prepared, issued, o"r transferred including tuition and other charges for schools, colleges, and universities owned or operated by a state or local government, except, however, that fees or charges for health services and for utility services (including gas, electricity, telephone, telegraph, publi~ transportation by vehicle or pipeline, but !1Q!: including water or sewag~ disposal services) provided directly or indirectly by a state and local government are not exempt under provisions of this section. " * Published in Federal Register, Vol. 37, No. 18 Thursday, January 27, 1972, commencing at Page 1237. ·nATE: A SURVEY Of INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS Orange Park Acres County of Orange California 3an~ary -February, 1972 Fcb~~ary 25, 1972 R~QUESTED BY: . i CONDUCTEp BY: Orange County Planning Department John E. ·Haines~ R.S. Environmental Heal th Speciali~t .. I REPORT WRITTEN BY: Stn-n-L.\RY OF FINDINGS: Andrew Pearson Assistant Environmental Health Sanitarian Richard Grudzinski Assistant Environmental Health Sanitarian Water Quality Control Section Divi~ion of Environmental Health Orange County Health Department Harlan G. Schroth, R.S. · Environmental Health Engine~ring Specialist O~ange County Health DepartQent . ; : .. ' . . . I During the ffionths of January .and. February, 1972, the Orange County Heal th Dcpartr..~n t conducted a survey of individual sewage system conditions in Orange· Park Acres, an unincorporated area of Orange County. The" survey consisted of personal inte=viH:s vith residents, field observations and a review of.all available individual se~age disposal pumping records, soil maps, well logs and both chemical and bacteriological sampling of dowestic well .water and suspected sewage overflows. The findings of the survey are suJ' . ..-narized as follows: I. A review of geological information of the Orange Park Acres area indicates that sub-surfaci soils are variabl~ in composition. As a result, the percolative capacity of the sub-soils varies from one sub area to anothe=, ranging fro~ very poor in 65% of the area, marginal in 30% and good in 5%. 2. In so~e ·sections of the area, the variable surface topography adds to the p~oblem of poor soil infiltration characteristics, naking these areas entirely unsuitable for the disposal of sewage effl~ent. ' 3. Reports from ·corr:!ilercial sewage pumpers, submitted to the Health Departoer.t, show that during the past three (3) years, fifty (SO) systems have be~n pumped, with seven (7) of these requiring two or more pumpings withi~ a period of one _hundred twenty (120) days. ~ 4. Interviews ~i th 143 of the 300 homeoKners in the area indicate a sys t2r:; · failure rate of 16% over the nost recent five year period. Also, 29% of ·the persons interviewed a:d;:litted to having their syste:;l pur..pcd out at leas~ once ~ince installation~ -. 5. -=2- During the field sucvcy, two sewage disposal sys tc:ms were observed to be ovc~flowing •. 6. Currcnlly, no soil 001..·ings or pcrcol~1tion tests clrc required by the D(;part- n1cnt of Duil<ling and Safe Ly pr lor to the lssuancc of a pcrrni t for thC! con·- struction of an individual sewage disposal system. 'CONCLUSION AND RECm~IENDATIO~:s: . . Orange Park Acres area is gcnerdly not well sui~ed for disposal of sewage by indivi- dual systc~ns •. This is evidenced by the recent history of disposal system failures and the very low soil infi 1 tr..:i tion ra tcs exhibi tcd in 657~ of the area. Since r.iuch of the developed and dcvclop.:=.ble land lies within this area> · ~ t is our opinion. th~ t sc1?agc clispo~;al system failu;:-cs will continue, even ff no further dcvclop;ncnt occurs, and wi.11 increase in frc_qucncy in _proportion with future devclopr.1en t. It is, therefore, recom~endcd that the necessary steps be initiated to provide alter- nate raeans of sewage disposal in the areas of poor infiltration characteristics. The m.os t obvious alternative is» ,of course, to provide sanitary sewers. However, if expense is no object, elabor2tc, well-engineered individual systems, utilizing adva~ced techniques suck as soil replacement and evapo-transp~ration, might possibly function in such areas. The chances of success are not too great. I~ is further recorri.mended th:at if individual sewage disposal syste=ns are permitted i:n the f~ tu re, _they .be approved only on the following conditions: .· i; That, prior to issuance of a building permit, a log 6f soil borings a~d .results of percola~Ion test b~ submitted to the Depa~tment of Building and Safety for evaluation on each lot for whi~h an applicatioa is made. The aforementioned pcrc0lation test should be periormcd and reported by a Registered Sanitari~n, Registered Civil or Sani~ary Engineer, Registered Geologist or Regist~red Engineering Geologist • . 2. That each proposed individual disposal systeQ be designed by a Registe7ed Civil or Sanitary E::igineer or Engineering Geologist." 3. That the proposed building site not be less than one acre. + 4. Tha;f an ad'ditional percolation system, equal to 100/o of th2 original de.si$r. capacity, be constructed and connected at the time of original construction. 5. That means be provided for assured routine preventive maintenance of such sy~tems, such as by the formation of a septic tank maintenance district. DISCUSS IO~: Scope of.Investigation· The Heal th Department conduct..ed a survey of individual sewage dis.posal sys te:ls co:l..: ditions in Orange Park Acres co~gunity, an unincorporated area in Orange County. This 2;-ea is located in T4S, · R%r> Sections 13, 14, 23, ·24, 25 and 26. The survey t·:2s co:1- '-"' ducted during the months of January and Fcbruarr, 1972, and consisted of the follo~:bg investigations; ·" . 1 ./ -J- _l. A hqusc to h6usc survey was conducted to detect existing scw~g~ ovcflows .and homco\mcrs were interviewed to determine thq history of sewage syst~~ pumping~ and failures. "i. Available geological dota on sub-su.rfacc soil and water conditions wns · · rcvict.,?cd. --......... --· . . .3. Interviews were held with person.ncl of the Orange County Water District, Orang6 County Flood Control District, U. S. Geological Survey Office, Orange County Building Department and the Orange Park Acr~s Mutual Water Company. . . . . -:4 •. All available Health Department pu:11ping records for septic tanks," seepage · pi ts· and cesspools in the area were reviewed. · · · -. .:..::.. -~ :5,.' _:samples from 't~a ter wells and ~s·uspected sewage overflows were cq~lected for: .:.. ·_ -· :chemical and bacteriological annlysis. i '.. :Backgr6urid ~f the.Area -.. --... _ .. _ .. ---·- ,·.. . -. .. -.. ~-.-:-·-~-·.: --...... ::. -:---... ~~he community of Orange Park Acres northern boundary begins at the western portion =~f the Sully-Miller sand and gravel operation and follows Santiago Creek to Villa ~P~rk-Dara. Thc'eastern boundary begins at Villa Par~ bam and cqntinucs south through :the Villa Park D~m Regioaal Park site to Chapman Avenue. The southern bou~dnry proceeds west along Chapoan Avenue to Newport Avenue, southeast'. along Newport Avenue, :ippro~~rnately:2QOO feet to the ·southern range qf hills, following the ridzc line ~est- . erly to. a po in~ w~ere the hills intersect Chapman Avenue. Th~ western boundcir-y begins - at Chapnan Avenue and proceeds north following the ridge of the hills to Santiago Cre~k. . -. . . . . In 19.29;·:a deep water well was drilled near Santiago Creek i11 T4S, R9W, Section 27, and the Orange Park Acres ~futual W?-ter Company was fonr.ed to serve the area. With water pip~d in, Orange Park Acres was divided into ~arcels of land for orc~ards; Homes were· esta~lished in··same of the groves; · · --· · ---- In the late 1940's and early 19SO's, chicken ranchers began to establish operations in the area-that threatened the continued existence of the pastoral setting.· -·As a result, residents· in the late 1950's, working in_conjunc~ion with established poultrymen, obtained oae acre minimura lots (there are some one-half acre lots), single faQily residence· zoning in most of the area to maintain a desirable bala~ce between residen- tial and ranching activities in the community (Ord. No. 685, passed by the Board of Supervis~rs on March 9, 1954, designated the area E4-l a~re minioum lots). The number of residents doubled in the decade of the late 1960's. At the present tine, there are approximately 300 families living in the area. Currently, twelve :(12) ne•,., homes are under construction in the area. Nany owners are subd.ividin.g their land and offering one, two, and three acre parcels for sale. --:-·.·---- Since ~ost lots in the area are large (one acr~), the Orange County Department of :~~ildinz. and Safety does not require that percolation tests or soil borings be r:1ade · in advance ·of construction of individual se\}age disposal sys ter.is.. The "rule of thu.-:ib" ~ :applied is a septic.tank plus one seepage pit per bedroom. In other words, it is :assumed that a leaching area can be depended.upon to dispo~e of sewage effluent regardless of the physical proP.erties of the soil. , ... - Ccologv anc1 Soil Characteristics 'l'h(? higher cle:Y~1tions in the '1rca consist mainly of non~pcrco1'1tiv~ scdi.rr.e:ntdry rocks which consist of sandstone, shale, and siltstone; iriclu<ling some volc~nic rocks and rocks older than Tertiary. . I Lower elevations exhibit strca1a terrace dcposl.ts of late plcistoce:ne: c:incl older alluvial deposits consisting of scmiconsolid,1tc<l silt, sand, zr?ve:l and rubble h.:ivine · · wat~r bcarin~ cap.:ibiliU.cs_. · ; .. . Soi~s found ~long Santiago Creek consists bf scmic6nsolidat~d iilt, sand ·and gravel having a high infiltration capability of greater than two inches (2") per hour. Soils of this 1 typc arc found in approximately five percent (~%) of the area. Else- where, approximately_ thirty percent (3070) of the study area cons is ts of older zlluvial depos_i ts of .sei:liconsolicla ted silt, clay, sand and gra_vcl which have a raediura infil tra- tion rate of one inch (1") to two inch~s (2") per hour. The remainder of the area, approximately sixty-five percent (65%) consists of consolidated sandstone, shale 2nd _si.ltst6nc. This soil type exhibits. very poor· infilt.ration· characteristics", less than -one inch (1") per hour. (Sec Pl.ate I, Soil Infiltration Characteristics) · Soils in \-:hich the infiltration rate is less than two inches (2") fn one: hour arc itn.suitablc for' seepage pits and rates slower than one inch (l~') per hour are unsui t- ~ble for any type of soil absorption sewage effluent disposal systera. Therefore) ~J:.eas exhibiting the aforcraentioned infiltration characteristic.s should not be cl~vclopcc ~?ipss suitable alternate disposal faciliti~s ?re ~vailable. Dciailed infor~ation on ground water chaiacteristics in the area was not readily ~vail­ able during the period that the survey was condudted. It wa~ established that oost of the water wells are shallow water table wells. The drilled deot~s of the wells ~ange be twc\;n fifty feet (50') to one hun<lre·d fo~ t (100'). Aionz irandy Cre:ck :!.::a r the ~outhern boundry of the area, the static water le~el is approximately thirty feet (30'). Alo_ng Santiazo Creek the static water level ~s approximatel?' sixty' feet (60' ). · Field Survey of Existing Individual Sewage Disposal Syster.is. "A-house to house survey was conducted and homeowners were in t"erviewed. to gather data on the history of sewage disposal system failures and make observations for t:vid-2:-ice of any faulty systems. A system failure i~ defined as the inability of the dis?osal ~;:stern tG function prope rry v:i thou t clogging and the resl}l tan t over flowing CO:LG i ~ions. One hundred·a~d forty-three (i43) of the apprnxiraately three.-hundred _(300) hor..eo~.~e:-s in the area were interviewed. All of the homes were visited but over half of the residents were not at home. Th~ data below represents the re~ults obtai~ed from the interviews conducted ~ur!n~ the survey a~d Health Departmcn~ records: : . -·~ --..... =~: • 1. Forty-two (42) p~~sons, or twenty-nine percent (29%) of those int~rvie~~d, admitted to at least one puRping since their dis?osal syster:1 was installed. However, when pressed they were vague r~zarding the exact nu~ber of ti~cs · . 'the systera had b~cn pumped and the time lapse bet~.:ccn p~~pings. -2. ·Twenty-three (23)-persons, or sixte.:!n pcrce:1t (16'1~) of those int~rvi12h·~c, reported leaching sy ~ tE;:l failures within. a f h~e year pc riod. Infor2.J. t l.c:-i. ·was n~t give~ during the interview3 indicating the o~curcnc~ of core than one failure. . . .. .· .· 3. ___ ".~-~cy_iC\\ of H~.:ilth µ(;parlrne:ul pu:nping records indicates tlial of the approxir.1.:t lc ly three lumdrcd ·hm:1cs in the a rca for ty-oac ( l; l), thi r le-en percent (13%) of the individu:-il scwogc cHsposal systems, had one purr.pinz during the years of 1970 and 1971. · ~ .. . · .... 4. Durin~ the ficl~ investigations two systc:n failures were observed, as evidenced by th,c ovcrflo·wing or sewage effluent from the leachine systems • .... . :.._ ... 5. ~ . . . . -. . .. - Of ~he approxirilat.cly 300 homc_owncrs in O·rnngc Park Acres, 157, or about fifty-six percent (56%) of the total, were not at home or una~ailablc for interviewing dudng the survey. · ·• \ During the invcrviews, the rcsidcrits in general were uncoopcraU.vc when we attcUipted to elici ~ infonna tion about their scw<tgc disposal sys terns. There was· ·a pcrvas ivc; feeling .among.residents that the.survey would accelerate ~ncorporation into the City of Orange, resulting in zone changes which would destroy the present rural atmosphere. ~1any of the persons intervic·wcd were housewives, who in most cases had little know- ledge -about their-sewage disposal systems •. ------. _· : ~ There w~s co::1l>l~tc agre:cmcnt> amonz all persons interviewed, that ho~ilcowncrs relied en ti rely upoa cesspool 'puwf>crs to ~void scwaze overflO\·?s when problc:-.1s arc first noted. Durini the survey there were two homes where sewage was observed oye:rflowing from.the leaching lines due_ to a-systc~ failure. The most frequent complaint w~de by.· the residents of the 23 homes reporting syst~~ failures, was ~hat the permeability of the soil is poor, which causes ovcrsaturation ~f th~ leac~ing lines·and ·seepage· pits. In addition, they encountered proble~s with their disposal systems not functioning propc~ly due to rain water iqfiltratio~ during . the· rainy seas<?n~ , . · Chemical and. bact~riological ana).yses of the· eight 0 (8) ~~·ater wells in the area were pcrfonned.i.n-an·a·ttcmpt to-establish what cf~cct, if any, .the sub-su:-facc disposal of sewage has upon the qu~li ty of the undergr~und water. in the area. The r-csu l ts ~f .the analyses are p~nding; th~refore, no data is available at this tirae •. Ho~ever, we wi~l continue to investigate this problem and .the finding~ will be reported a~ a later· date.·· --· · .--· -. ---· i. · • : _. i •.. . -.. . . -. -..... ----... :·--.: ..... · ' ,, -. . . . .. -·. -.. ---. .. . ... . . . . . . . : . . ·I' .. . . . . J. . . . . SOIL INFILTRATION CHARACTE{US1'ICS .. -.. ·' , .. . ..... -.... - ---· . -· . - -·-. --.. -" - , . -~ --.... ·... ···--- ------' - ~-·_ : -~: : . .. ~ -. -. -,. ~ ..... -···· .. . . -.... ' -: ·::. · .. -. - . : . . -. . .. .. ----. -~::.: ·-.. · .. - LEGEND --:-Orange Park Acres Co~~unit~ Boundary Lines ·o v.;::A1. ~ High Infiltration· Rate (Greater than 2.0 inches/hour) , Mediu~ Infiltration Rate (1.0 to 2.0 inches/hour) . Low Infiltration Rate (Less than·i.o inches/hour) •, . ._ ., / ! HEALTH DEPARTMENT Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Orange Santa Ana, California . ~ JOHN R. PH!LP, M.D • H E 1. L T H 0 F F I C E. P. • SAHTA AHA Of°FICE 645 NCRTH ROSS SH~EET SAHTA A~~A. CALIFOF11llA 9~702 TELEPHOt~E: 83~-3131 l.\otllng Ac!clrou: P, O. Cor: 355 Santo Ano, C ollfcrnlo 92701 AHAHEW OFFICE 1011 SOUTH EAST STREET AHA.HEIM. CAUFOP.~HA TELEPHONE: 776-5551 Malling Acldrcu: P, 0, Cox 355 Sonia.Ano, ColtForr.lo 92702 Marc~ 6, 1972 SUBJECT: _Appeal on condition of approval No. 1 of Division of Land No. 1323 Revised -Brock. BRIEF: ·Gentlemen: The Health Officer recommends that Condition of Approval No. 1, on Division of Land No. 1323, Revised -Brock; be upheld, with possible consideration of an alternative as prcsepted in the Health Department report dated February 25, 197,2. On January 12, 1972, your Honorable Board heard a_n -~ppeal from Mr. Norman Brock ._regarding Condition of Approval No. 1 imposed by. the Planning Commission on Division of Larid No. 1323, Revised. This condition involved sewage disposal, and was based on a·recornmendation of the Health Department. At the request of the applicant you continued the hearing to March 8,. 1972. Mr. Brock also requested this Department to restudy the matter in the interim and report our findings and . r.ecommendations to you. Subsequently, we were asked by the Planning Department to study the question of sewage disposal in all ot Orange Park Acres as-part of a review of a proposed ·community plan prepared by residents of the area. This review also was requested by your Board. Attached hereto is a report entitled "A Survey of Individual Sewage Disposal Systems, Orange Park Acres, County of Orange, California" dated February 25, 1972. We believe the findings, conclusions and recorrunendations contained in this report will serve to answer both of the above-mentioned requests, being applicable to the subject division of land as well as the area generally. You will note, upon reading the report, that so_il conditions in most of Ora.nge Park ~· Acres are .not well suited for the disposal of ~ewage by individual systems. Our , 1 ,· Honorable Board of Supervisors -2-March 6, 1972 -- . . . reconunendation is that alternate means of disposal be· provided, with sanitary _sewers being the rnet~o_d of choice. Well-engineered individual systems, e1n- ploying advanced design techniques, might possibly function, but the expense would be great and the likelihood of continued successful opcraqo~ slim. --..... ~ .RECOMMEN_J?,~TION: ...... . ·. .-· .. -. ~---· .- _:.._-:.-.;_:~ :· . . F----: .. .. --· :-:..~. :_ .... --. -,.. ·-. . -. . ':. - . Attachment. . .. -~ -...... .. ::-. : : ·~ :·_ : .. .; ~ -. . . ; ... . . . \..·:-~.:; ·:: .-. : .: .~:: :-.:: ~: ~-:. -: ·: · .. : : . ~ :. :~: ~ ::-. -~ . - : .. : -. -: =. : ·=: ~ -·• Condition of Approval No. l, the provision of sanitary sewers for the subject division _of land, should_ b_e upheld. Ii:dividual systems should only be approved, for a prescribed period of time until sewers are available, under the conditions stated in the a .. ttached r~port. Respectfully submitted, ~~L~ <. cU4-/fa>a JOHN R. PHILP, M. D. Health Officer County of Orange .· , , l 2 3 4 5 6 ? 8 9 RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. ------- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWERS AND APPURTENANCES AND APPURTENANT WORK IN "ASSESS- MENT DISTRICT NO. 9" IN SAID SANITATION DISTRICT; DECLARING THE WORK AND IMPROVEMENT TO BE OF MORE THAN LOCAL OR ORDINARY PURLIC BENEFIT AND DESCRIBING THE DISTRICT TO BE BENEFITED BY SAID WORK AND IMPROVEMENT AND TO PAY THE COSTS AND EXPENSES THEREOF; FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OF OBJECTIONS TO SAID WORK AND IMPROVE- MENT. 10 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 11 NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, pursuant to the provisions of 12 Article 4. 5, Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code of 13 the State of California, and to the provisions of the "Improvement Act of 14 1911," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of 15 California, does RESOLVE as follows: 16 17 18 DESCRIPTION OF WORK SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it 19 is the intention of the Board of Directors of COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 20 NOQ 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, to order the following work and 21 improvement, to-wit:. 22 The construction of sanitary sewers, appurtenances and all other 23 appurtenant work in connection therewith; in 24 CHAPMAN A VENUE 25 between a point approximately 1, 45 0 feet easterly of the centerline of Crawford 26 Canyon Road (formerly Newport Avenue) and a point approximately 4, 780 feet 27 easterly and northeasterly of said centerline as measured along the centerline 28 of Chapman Avenue, all as shown on Sheets 2(revised), 3 and 4 of the Plans 29 hereinafter referred to. 30 31 32 LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL, HARVCY & LOGAN FOURlH l'LOOR IOIO NORTll MAIN BT. SANTA ANA, CALll"ORNIA 92701 PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 2: That all of the sajd work and improvement to be done as -1- l "-"" 2 :; 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 I 31 described in Section 1 of this Resolution shall be constructed upon the grades, along the lines, between the points, of the dimensions, at the places and in the manner shown on the plans, profiles and drawings for the construction of said work and improvement in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9" for County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, consisting of 4 sheets, numbered 1, 2 (revised), 3 and 4, and identified as "Construction Plans for the Sanitary Sewer System in Assessment District No. 9, County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, 11 dated March, 1972, all of which Plans are on file in the office of the Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, and in the office of the Engineer of Work, and except as otherwise provided on said plans, in further accord- ance with the specifications for the construction of said work and improvement, said specifications being on file in the office of the Secretary of County Sanita - tion District No. 7 of Orange County, California (and in the office of the Engineer of Work), and to which plans, profiles, drawings and specifications, heretofore approved by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, reference is hereby made for a further, full and more particular description of said work. That work and grading and grades shall be in accordance with the grades as shown on said plans, profiles and drawings hereinabove mentioned, which said grades may be different from the grades heretofore existing, established or adopted. That all of the rights-of-way for public sewer purposes hereinabove described are shown upon the said plans, profiles and drawings hereinabove described. DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT SECTION 3: That the said contemplated work and improvement, as aforesaid, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit and the said Board of Directors hereby makes the expenses of said work and improvement charge- able upon a district, which said district the Board of Directors hereby declare 32 to be the district benefited by said work and improvement chargeable upon a LAW OFF"ICES OF RIMEL, HARVEY & LOGAN FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST, 6"NTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 -2- l 2 3 4 ·5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 district, which said district the Board of Directors hereby declares to be the district benefited by said work and improvement and to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, including incidental expenses and costs, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Orange included within the exterior boundary lines shown on the plat exhibiting the property affected or benefited by or to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses of said work and improvement in said "ASSESSMENT . DISTRICT N0 0 9, '.' which said plat consists of one sheet and is entitled, "Pro- posed Boundaries of Assessment District No. 9, County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, Calif.," dated August, 1971, and which was finally approved by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, on September 30, 1971, indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within the proposed assess- ment district, and which map or plat is on file in the office of the Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, and a copy of which is on file in the office of the Engineer of Work, EXCEPTING from th.e area shown within and delineated upon said map or plat he reinabove referred to, the area of all public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys and all easements and rights-of-way therein contained belonging to the public, and any lot or parcel of land belonging to the United States, and also excepting therefrom any lot or parcel of land belonging to the State of California or to the County of Orange or to the Orange County Flood Control District, which lot or parcel of land is in use for the performance of any public function, and all such property above mentioned and described as being excepted from the area shall be omitted from the assessment hereinafter to be made to cover the costs and expenses of such work and improvement. Lots or parcels of land owned by school boards, school districts or other public or private educational authorities, whether or not devoted to public or school uses and purposes, shall not be excepted or 30 31 omitted from said district or from said assessment, but shall be included in 32 said assessment. Reference is he re by made to said plat for further, full and LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL, HARVEY & LOGAN P'OURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 9270, -3- l more particular description of the said assessment district, and the said plat 2 so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment dis- 3 trict. 4 5 6 DESCRIPTION OF BONDS SECTION 4: That serial bonds, bearing interest at the rate of seven '1 per cent (7%) per annum, shall be issued to represent each assessment of 8 Fifty Dollars ($50. 00) or more remaining unpaid at the expiration of the last 9 date fixed for payment of assessment in the notice to property owners mailed 10 pursuant to the provisions of Section 5390 of the Streets and Highways Code 11 of the State of California. Said serial bonds shall extend over a period ending 12 nine (9) years from the second day of January next succeeding the next Septem- 13 ber 1st following their date. Payments on the principal of unpaid assessments 14 and interest thereon shall be made by property owners to the County Treasure 15 and the same shall be disbursed by said County Treasurer, all as provided in 16 the "Improvement Act of 1911 11 hereinafter referred to. 17 This Board of Directors does hereby elect and determine to have the 18 redemption provisions of said bonds provide a premium of five per cent (5%) 19 of the unmatured principal in accordance with the provisions of Section 6464 20 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. 21 22 23 ESTIMATED COSTS AND EXPENSES SECTION 5: That the estimated costs and expenses of said work and 24 improvement, inclusive of the incidental expenses of the proceedings under 25 said Resolution of Intention, are as follows: 26 Estimated costs of all Incidental Expenses . . . . $11, 400. 00 2? 28 29 30 31 32 LAW OFFlcr:s Of'" RIMEL, HARVEY & LOGAN FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 Estimated costs and expenses of the Work and Improvement, excluding all incidentals. 50, 360.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS AND EXPENSES ... $ 61, 760. 00 TIME AND PLACE OF HEAHING. SECTION 6: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on the 12th day of -4- ·/ ,VV 1 ___ A_..p_r_i_l ____ • 1 972, at the hour of ...-7--:'30 o 'clock p. m .• in the Chamber 2 of the Board of Dire ctors of County Sanitat i on District No . 7 of Ora nge County, 3 10844 E llis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California, a ny and a ll p e r sons h aving 4 any objections to the proposed work or improvement, or to the extent of the 5 ass e ssment district, or to the propose d g rades , may appear and show cause 6 why said work should not be done or carried out in accordance with this R eso- 7 lution of Intent i on. Pro t ests mu st be in writing and must con tain a d e scriptio 8 of the property in which each signe r the reof i s interested, sufficient to id e ntify 9 the same , and must be d e livered to the Secretary of the Bo a rd of Di rectors of 10 County Sanitation Dis trict No . 7 of Orange County prior to the time set for the 11 h earing and no oth e r prote sts or objections will b e con s idered. If the signer 12 of any protest is n ot shown upon the l ast equalized assessme nt roll of Orange 13 County as the owner of the propert y d es cribed in the prote st, then such protest 14 must cont ain o r be accompanied b y written evide n ce that such signe r i s the 15 owne r of t h e prope rty so described. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LAW OFF IC C S OF RIM EL. H ARVEY & L O G AN F'OUnTH FLOOR tOIO N OllTtt MAIN ST. SANTA ANA, CALIFO RNIA 0270 1 IMPROVEMEN T ACT SECTION 7 : That a ll of the work h ere in proposed s h a ll be done a nd carried through in pursuance of an Act o f the L egislature of the State of C a li- fornia, designated as the "Improvement Act o f 1911," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. That prior to the adoption of this resolution, t he re was prese n te d to this Board of Directors and fil e d with the Secreta ry of this District a writte n petition purs u a nt t o the provis ions of Section 2804 of t he Streets and Highways Code of the State o f California, being a part of the "Sp ecial Assess - ment Investigati on, Limitation a n d Ma jority Pro t e st Act o f 1931," s i g n ed b y the owne rs of more tha n 9 0 % in area of the pro p e rty proposed to be s ubje cted t o a ssessment for the proposed imp rovement; there thereafte r in accordance with the provisions o f Sect i o n 2804 of said St reets and Highways Code, the Board of Dire ctors o f County Sanitation Dist ri c t No. 7 of Orange County, California, did duly and regularly adopt its Resolution No. 71-122-7, on Septembe r 30, 1 9 71, d e t e rmining t o proce e d u nder the prov i sions of the -5- l "-""' 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL, HARVEY 8c LOGAN FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NOHTH MAIN ST, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA. 92701 "Improvement Act of 1911" without further reference to or application of the provisions of the said "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931." PROPERTY OWNERS NOT TO TAKE CONTRACT SECTION 8: Pursuant to the provisions and the authority granted by Section 5260 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County does hereby determine and declare that, in the opinion of this Board of Directors, the public interest will not be served by allowing the property owners to take the contract and the property owners will not be allowed or permitted to take the contract. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County does further hereby determine and declare that the contractor to whom the contract is awarded may sign said contract immediately upon the award of the contract and must execute said contract and file the required bonds with said County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County within twenty-five (25) days after the date of first publication of notice of award of contract. PUBLICATION OF RESOLUTION OF INTENTION SECTION 9: That THE ORANGE CITY NEWS, a weekly newspaper printed and published four times weekly and of general circulation within County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County is hereby designated as the newspaper in which this Resolution of Intention shall be published by the Secre tary, in the manner and form provided by law, and for making all other publi- cations in the proceedings under this Resolution of Intention, unless otherwise provided. The Secretary is directed to mail notices of the adoption of this Resolution of Intention to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed, whose names and addresses appear on the last equalized assessment roll for County taxes, or as known to the Secretary, all in the manner and for provided for under Sections 5070, 5194 and 5195 of said "Improvement Act of -6- 1 2 ~ 3 4 5 6 F/ 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 32 IA.W Ol'f'ICL~ Of' lflMU., ltf\UVC:Y ll< L(l<tAN I t>llli I 11 P' l.ODH l(ll" llUl:l 11 M 'I.IN &l·, l·A.111" ''""· CA.I l~lll,NIA. 0~~701 1911" of said Streets and Highways Code. POSTING OF NOTICE OF IMPROVEMENT SECTION 10: That the Engineer of Work shall cause to be conspicu- ously posted along the line of said contemplated work or improvement and along all open streets within the district liable to be assessed for said work, notices of the passage of this Resolution of Intention in the time, mannc r and form provided by said Code. FILING MAP OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT SECTION 11: That the Secretary is d~rected to endorse on the original and on at least one copy of the. map or plat of the assessment district as referred to in Section 3 hereof his certificate evidencing the date and adoption of this Resolution of Intention, and he is further directed to file the original of such map or plat in his office, and within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of this resolution and in no event later than fifteen (15) days prior to the date of hearing as provided in Section 6 hereof, he is further directed to file a copy of said map or plat, with his endorsement the re on, with the County Recorder of Orange County, California, all in the manner and forrn provided for in Section 3111 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY at an adjournec regular meeting thereof held this 21st day of March , 1972. ~~~~~--~~- Chainnan Sec rciary -7- . . . " l CERTIFICATION 2 I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of COUNTY SANITATION 3 DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, California, do hereby certify that 4 the foregoing Resolution No. 72--7 was duly adopted at an adjourned --- 5 regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District 6 No. 7 of Orange County held on the 21st day of March , 1972, by the -------- 7 following vote of the members of the Board: 8 9 10 AYES: NOES: Directors Directors 11 ABSENT: Directors ~-----~---~-~----~~ 12 and I further certify that CLIFTON MILLER, as Chairman, and J. V/AYNE 13 SYLVESTER, as Secretary, signed and approved said resolution on the 21st 14 15 16 17 day of March --------, 1972. Secretary, County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California 18 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. 19 County of Orange ) 20 I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of COUNTY SANITATION 21 DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, California, do hereby certify that 22 the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. 72-__ -7, 23 passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District 24 No. 7 of Orange County at an adjourned regular meeting thereof held on the 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL, HARVEY & LOGAN ,-OURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA, CALIFOllNIA. 92701 21st day of March , 1972. -------- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of this District this 21st day of March , 1972. --~---~~ Secretary, County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California ME ETI NG DATE -~ '1--\ ,.1}-. DISI8IC T 1 __ GRISET ----BATTIN - - MILLER ---PORTER U'"TBICT 2 ------·-· _. SMITH _:__..:. CHRISTIE --__ CLARK) ROBT -·-CULVER __ FINNELL __ HERRIN _._JUST __ PHILLIPS __ SIMS --_ STEPHENSON __ WEDAA __ WINN DISIRICT 3 --__ HYDE __ BATTIN __ BERTON _ CHRISTIE __ CLARK) ROBT --__ 'CULVER __ DAVIS GREEN --HARPER HARVEY HERRIN HEMEON HOLDEN MC V-lH INN EY SIMS STEPHENSON DISTRICT 5 ------PARSONS ------CASPERS ----__ HIRTH DISTRJ CT. 6 --_b'--·-PORTER -I ' --£_ --CASPERS 1t -41.-/ 1-V'fr --MC INNIS D SI~ICU .! v v _./_MILLER _L_X _./_ _.;_ CLAR KJ RALPH L2 __:£_ ___{_ GR I SET ..;__/ ./ __:{_ PORTER ·--_. -~QUIG LEY --;,. ~R OG E RS ~~v ./ ~SMITH -- DI SIRlC T 11 ----__ SHI PLEY ----__ BAKER ----__ COEN DI STRI CT 8 BOYD CA SP ERS MITCH ELL ------ TIME _;: () 1) J)f,/'-DISTRICTS ·1 (HERRIN) ~CASPYRs) coco (HILEMAN) (ROOT) (JACKSON) (GOMEZ) !GR I SET) HARPER) CASPERS) IZUNIGAl DUTTON MACHADO) SCHNIEPP) ~KROESEN) CASPERS) ~WEST~A) ROOT (JACKSON) ~FONTE) MC CRACKEN) (JUST) ( Kt,NEL) (GR I SET) (LEWI S) (BARNES) ~ZUNIGA) DUTTON) (CROUL) (HIRTH) ~coco) CASPERS) (HERRIN) ~FISCH~ACH) HIRTH (HILEMAN) ~MC CRAC~E N) CA SP ERS (GOLD BERG) " JQI~I B08RDS __ JUST ~HARPER) --BAKER CASPE RS) (CASPERS) BATTIN . BERTON (WESTRA) .. CASPERS --~ROOT) CHRISTIE __ CLARK) ROBT JACKSON) --__ CLARK) RALPH (CASPERS) . COEN --.. CULVER --DAVIS ~FONTE~ --FINNELL GOMEZ --QUIGLEY (FISCHBACH) GREE N (MC CRACKEN) --GR I SET ~HERR~N) HARPER JUST ---.-HARVEY ~KANEL~ -. -. -HEMEON LEWIS ---. -. -HERRIN (GR I SET) ---.-.-HIRTH (CROUL) ... .. -. -HOLDE N ?HOGA RD) ----. HYDE KROESYN) --MC INNIS (HIRTH ---. -.-MC WH I NNEY --MILLER (coco) --PARSO NS --. PHILLIPS (CASPERS) --PORTER ROGERS (HIRTH) --(MC CRACKEN) SHIPLEY __ .SIMS (ZUNIGA) _·_SMITH (HILEMAN) __ STEPHENSON (DUTTON) ----__ WEDAA (MAC HADO) __ WINN (SCH NIEPP) 41-* * * --· MITCHELL --BOYD (GOLDBERG) OTHERS . <?HARPER _. BRO\"/N v .SYL.VESTER -. -V7-LEWI S _._._DUNN _·_CLARKE ----:7 SI GLE~R __\L_ NI SSON :...._· CR ABB . _ u ~ TAYLO .R ~(i Q_~- -'lc~N _. _. FIN STER ~A LLO WA Y _v_l-lH OHENER __ HOWARD __ .HUNT -· _·_KE iff H Jtvb _lL_ . ~.,v->-rt.. •. _._._LYNCH ___ MADDOX __ MART I NSON MURONEY __ P I ERSAL L --STEVENS (1) ~)} Qt I. l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 1 4 1 5 1 6 17 1 8 1 9 20 2 1 22 23 24 25 26 27 2 8 2 9 , \) 30 ~i~J 31 ry 32 L AW OFFICE:S OF R I M EL, HARVEY & L O GA N FOUR Tll FLOOR IOIO NOUTH MA IN 6 T. 6A NTJ\ A NA, C A l.I FORN IJ\ 927 0 1 , FORM OF M I NUTES COUNT Y SA NITATION DISTRICT NO . 7 ASSESS MENT DISTRI C T NO. 9 ---;J_, "'-... • II-' _( MARCH 21, 1 9 72 5:00 p. m. Edwi n H. Fins ter, of B o yle Enginee r i n g, t he Enginee r o f Work for "A SSESSMENT DIS TRICT NO . 9 , 11 present e d to the B o ard of Dire ctors for it s consid erat i o n a nd a pproval t he Pla ns for s ai d pro p o s e d wo rk and i m p rove m ent , e ntitled "C o n stru c t ion Pla ns for t h e Sanita r y Sewer Syste m in A sses sme nt Di s t r i ct No . 9, C o unty .Sa nitati o n D istrict No . 7 of Ora n g e Count y , California," d a ted Marc h, 1 9 72, cons i s ting o f 4 shee t s , numbered 1, 2(Revi sed ), 3 a nd 4 . D i rect or\!~ , m ove d that said Pla n s be a p proved , re c eive d a n d fil e d, a n d said m ot i on was second ed b y Di rector {~ and P-~~~~~~~-car rie d b y the fo ll owing r o ll call v ote : . AYE S : NOES : Direct ors -~~~ cf~~ M /Jv:;6__, ,()*l /~~~? ~ (' I Di rect o rs -b)p ~ -:if'.( LI l \ ABSENT: Di rectors -QA-V~(, ~ Mr. F ins t er t h en offered to the B oard of Direct o rs , for its c ~ a nd a p proval , t h e propos e d Estim ate of Cost fo r a ll w ding inc id e ntal expense s t h e r eof, sa i d Es tima t e o f Cost be said motio n was b y t h e foll owing roll ca ll vot e: AYES : Dire c tors - N S : Di recto r s - prop osed R esol uti o n o f Intention to b e numbered RESOLUTION OF I NTENTION NO . 7 } .. u-J, .. /7 , e ntitled as follow s : "A RESOLUTION OF THE BOA RD OF D I RECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DJ~S TR I CT NO . 7 OF 01\ANGE CO UNTY, CALIFORN IA, D J~C LARING ITS I NTENT I ON T O onDEH TIIE CONSTHUCTION OF SA NITA H Y SEWE H.S AND APPURTENANCES J\ND APPURTENANT wom.;: IN -1 - .. 1 111 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9' IN SAID SANITATION DISTRICT; DECLARING THE WORK AND I MPROVEMEN T 2 TO BE OF MORE THAN LOCAL OR ORD I NARY PUBLIC BENEF IT AND D ESCRI BING THE DISTRICT TO BE 3 BENEFITED BY SA ID WORK AND I MPROVEMENT TO BE OF MORE TH AN L OCA L OR ORD INARY PUBLIC BENEF I T AN D 4 DESCRIB ING THE DIS TRICT TO BE BENEFITED BY SAID WORK AND IMPHOVEMENT AND TO PAY THE COS TS AND 5 E X PENSES THEREOF; FIX ING THE TIME AND PLACE FOH HEARING OF OBJECTIONS TO S A ID WORK AND IM PROVE - 6 MENT." 7 Said resoluti on of intentio n fixed the time and date of hearing as A pri l 12, 7 O•) 8 1 9 7 2 , at the h o ur of-.'.7-:-3 0 o 'clock p. m .• 9 It was thereupon moved by Director cQJ that sa i d 10 RE SOLUTION OF INTENT ION NO. 72 ,. Lf 'vl 11 motion was second e d b y D irect or ~ 12 r o ll call vote : 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 3 2 AYES: NOES : ABSENT: Directo rs - Directo rs - D i r ecto r s - be adopted , and said and carried by the following LAW OFFI CES OF R IME L , HARVEY & L OGAN F OURTH FLOOR 10 10 NORTH M A IN ST. SAN T /\ ANA1 CAl.ll'OllNIA 9270 1 -2-