The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1972-03-08COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) March 3, 1972 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF couwrY SANITA'TION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3-L2, 6, 7, AND 11 Gentlemen.: TELEf'HON ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 A regular meeti.ng of th9 Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, a.nd 11, of Orange County, California, will be held: Wednesday evening, March 8, 1972 at 7:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis \venue Fountain Valley, California Tentative adjourrunent prior to the next regular meeting: Executive Committee Meeting -March 28, 5:30 p.m. I II II no A ~D5 OF o;~::cro~s ( ount)' Sc.n:tation Districts of O range County, California ·'.· March 8? 1972 -7:30 p .m. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation Roll Ca ll > . /,. 9 ~ P. 0 . Box 5i75 10844 Ellis Avenu~ Fountain Valley, Cal i F., 92708 AGENDA v ADJOURNMENTS POSTED ... . COMP & M!'....EACE~ .... . ~~:~L~~o 1~: .. ~E ~~;~39·.·v LETIEl1S WR!TTCN .............. . MINUTES \'/RITTEi\/"· MINUTES \-\LED ................ ~ j(l) ) (2) J (3) v Rt\.-F -.PL-~ u ~ \ App ~tme n t of ~irmen pro te ~ if ne ~s sary ( 4) EACH DI STRICT 1 Consideration of mo ti ons approving minutes of t he following meet i ngs, as mailed : v District 1 February 9 , 197 2 r egular v Distric t 2 F ebruary 9 , 1972 special February 9, 1972 regular ,_/ District 3 February 9, 1972 r egular v Dis trict 5 F ebru ary 9 , 1972 r egul ar ~is t rict 6 F eb ruary 9 , 197 2 r egular l/ District 7 February 9 , 1972 r egul ar NJ Is and <V1 I <; IV\ J '-') (V) 1 ~ and M/) F~bruary 29 , 1972 adjourned (V)} s February 9, 1972 reg ular District 11 v-"'((5)\ ALL DISTR ICTS ~ R2port o f the Joint Chai rman ~ ALL J?I~C ~-~ ~-rQl '\.,, Report "'Z_f' the Gen'-~ M ana~e r ("\! AL L_D TRICTS \. _ ~, "'-. Repo rt f the ~1e ral ~uns ~ I (8) ALL DI STRICTS v" Rep ort of the Execut i ve Comm ittee and consideration of motio n to r e c e i ve and f ile the Corrnr1i tte e ' s written r epo rt .. , ,. (9) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee : D TC"mDTrtm0 .-, AND 1 3 r:: 6 '7 c 1 1 .L u .L l \.L v .i. u c:. 2 2 .-J 2 2 r 2 UC ..L FILE ... Nit ... Consider·ation of Resolution No . 72 -25 , approvi ng "Wast e Wate r Interceptor Capacity Agreement'' b e tween Ch ino Basin Mu nicipal Water District and LEnER ···=···· A/C ':::TKL R .::;- t..Aistrict No . 2 , subject to an agreement between t he Sanitation Districts as to allocation of revenues , and subj e ct t o approval of t he Gen~ral Counse l. !.1f:.!?t ........ _ .. _, ........................... _ See page 11 D" (b ) Co n sideration:of Resolut i on No . 72 -26 , approvi ng v terms of ,the "Waste Water Treatment and Disposal FILE ····-·--·-J Agreement with Chino Ba.sin Municipal Water mm .:::::-:..._ District, subject to an a.g reement between the A/c -: .. TKlR .:.:: Sanitation Districts as to allocation of reven ues A .c;~\i .... _____ and subject to approval of the General Counsel . ----··-See page '1 E" ~'A (c ) Consideration of Resolution No . 72~27, aut h o~izing file ·P'·· :A...... / , execution of an agreement with Orange County Water Distri ct LETTER #fl···-_r...//,,V i to provj_de 15 mgd secondary treated water for Water A/c~.TKLR :::-/'V'>'jt,/v Di str:Lct reclamation facility and the right to discharge ...... ::::::::........... A v" a. l i k e amount of' sa.l t brine s and other residual · materia l to .. -I __ Sanitation District f'acil i ties . See page "F1 ' --.......... _____ ( d ) Consideration of motion declaring intent o_f_t_h_e __ FILE .~A.. .. - LETTER .. ~ Boards of Di re ct ors to ap prove an e xt ension of the Joint Powers Agreement , creating the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project for an additi onal three year period , with funding to be provid ed on a year to ye ar basis ; and re -appointing A/C~TKlll ~-V Lindsl ey Parsons as Commissioner r epresenting -----·--··· .. ····- FILE ..... /,).~ .. . LETTER ... V.. .. . A/C :dKLR -::?. -- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County on t he Commission of the Southern California Coast al Water Research Projec t qu thority for the extended t hree year period (e) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manage r to negotiate purchase ~ontract with Dow ~ Chemical Company for acquisition of Polyelect rolyte C-41 f or a total amount not to exceed $5,000 .00 (f ) Consideration of motion to r eceive , file and approve ~ ~ "Feasibility Study of Air -Supported Roofs for Various FILE -··'f:/A.-Waste wate r Treatment Facili ties, County Sani ta ti on LETTER ...... 1::\-Districts of Orange County , California", submitted by we .... TKlR ..... _./Louis R. Hovate r; and refer to Districts 1 treatment plant .......................... enginee rs for consideration in the 197 2 Master Plan Repo rt -·······---··-··-··--and Prelir:1 :..nary Design Study . (10) ALL DISTRICTS -)(--)(/ -)(--)(-* -)(- CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the consent calendar a r e con- sidered as not requiring discuss i on or further explana~ion and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent cal endar by a Director , staff member, or member of the public in attendance,, there will be no separate discussion of these items . All items on the consent calendar will be enact e d by one action app roving all motions , and casting a unanimous bal l ot for resolutions included -2 - (1 0) ALL DISTRICTS -CONSENT CALENDAR CONTINUED on the cons ent calendar. All items removed f r om the consent calendar shal l be considered separately in the regular order of business. Membe r s of the pub l ic who wish to r emove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair , state their name , ·addr ess and d esignate by l et t e r the item to be r emoved from the consent calendar. Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar . Consideration of action to approve all agenda '\ c.. items appearing on the consent calendar not \'\"'\J speci fically removed from same . ~;-1."? (a) A/C .:-'.:TJcLR =· Consideration of Resolution No . 72 -28 , approving plans and spec ificat ions for Power Reliability Project at Plant No . 2 , J ob No . P2 -20 ; and authorizing advertising for bids to be opened Ap ril 6 at 11 :00 a .m. See page 11 G11 NA (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file ~~ W~ Financial Reports submitted by Hanson , Pe terson , '~ +t-v-\ < Cowles and Sylvester , Certifie d Pub lic AJc _..:.::.:.mtt. :;., ti\ \S Acc ountants, for the quarters ending. Septembe r -·-················· 30, 1971 and December 31, 1971, previously ·_.:::::................ mailed by auditors FILE ••• ti.:A.. ... N (c) Consideration of motion approving Change LEnER .N.A .. . A/C ::-::TKLR -: •. , --------.... ..,., Order No . 2 to Administration-Engineering Building Addition , Job No . J -7 -2 and Veh icle Ma intenance Facilities , Job No . J -12, authorizing t.--'the addition of $3,782 .11, and an extension of 63 calendar days, to the contract with B . H. Mi l ler Const ruction Company . See page 11 H11 FILE •. Ji.A .. _ LEITER .• 1:1..(l ( d ) A/C =TKLJL • .., •• ·-. -<.::::::' •.• - •u-••·•-·•·•-•000-0,,.....'*' Consid e ration of motion authorizing one year extension for Operation Trans ition Program conducted cooperation with Orange · Coast College, as requested by Environ.mental Protection Agency in FILE •••••• k'.'.'_,~ ( e) Consideration of motion authorizing advertising for bids for tmeR -~---~ re placem 6 . e nt 24 -inc h conve y or belting, Specific a ti on ' No . E-0 l ; and authorizing the General Manager A/C "':: .. TK LR -;;w ~to awaid purchase to the lowest r espons ib le b idder i n an amount not to exceed $3_,200 .00 , plus tax and fr e ight --·-.. •-•h··--··""··-* * * * * * * * * * tr\ \:3 (11) ALL DISTRICTS iv Conside ration of items de l eted from consent cale ndar, if any v (1 2) ALL D~S TRI~~S . . . . .· FILE ....• iTli.''* a/" Considerai:.ion of Re solution No . 72 -38, approving inter -district LEm" .~Y..l:j, \ . agreement r e allocation of reve nues received from . A/C ~KL R "f.} s Chino Basin Municipal Water District in conn e ction with waste - -, 1 \ '" water disposal agreements , and authorizing execution by -··-·:;:::.::::·-re spec ti ve Distric ts . See pag e it I it , ______ ... \.··~"\".,\. -3 - JtLE -1.±441 3 ) ALL DI STR I CTS . . LEr" [:!'A : ~onside ration of motion app ro ving Change Order No . 2 A/C ... ~.... to the plans and specifications fo r Interplant Influent .... ::::::.-flt f\ , Inte rc.ep tor _, J ob No . I -8 , authorizing an addition of ,---\~ \ 5 $89 _,600 .00 , to the contract with Ko rdick and Rado s_, a --Joint Ve nture . See page "J " F1tt: .tJ.A .. ( 14) LL DISTRICTS t m ER J.A... Consideration of motion autho rizing the General Ma n age r c ~TKLR -:-:-:-. to designate ten staff membe r:-s to . at tend the 44t 0 . Al · \ Annual Confe r ence of the Cal ifo rnia. Wat er Pollution Control __ .... c:=. .. -A S Association to be held jointly with the Nevada Wate r --··-······-·--N Pollution Control Association _, May 3rd t hrough 6th in South Lake Taho e _, CaTi fornia _, as provided for in t he 1 971-72 Joint Operating Bu d get ; and aut hori zing payment for r eg istration f ees _, meals , t ransportation , lod ging and inc i d e ntal expenses (1 5 ) ALL DISTRICTS \ Co ns ide ration of motion to receive and file c erti fication , . J\~ t;of the General Manage r that he has checked all bills ~ \ -appearing on the agenda _, found them to be i n orde r_, and that he r ecommends authorization f or payment (16) ALL DISTRICTS Conside ration of roll call vote mot ion approving J oi nt Ope'r at ing and Cap·i tal Outlay Revolving Fund warrant bo o ks for signature o f the Chairman of District No . l ?i and authorizing payment of c l aims l is ted on page 1 A" LL DIST, CTS ), ther bus i: ess and commu ~at i ons ,_ J\[. any DISTRI C'I'S 1 & 7 Cons i deration of motion approving S uspense Fund warrants _, if any . Se e page II c" FILE •. N. ~-... ~ 1 9 ) DISTR I CT 1 1 LfTTER .. N.f.1.\\, ~ to the plans a nd specification s f or Main-Dyer Interc ep to r_, J.:i.71. ~ Consider a t ion o f mot i on approving Change Order No . Ale .::-:T"Kut :y1 \ • .J Reaches 25 , 26 , 27 & 28 , Cont ract No . 1 -12, aut h orizing ·························· i_...--;an addition of $1,0 50 . 59 , to the cont r act with Mike -·-·····-···-··-··-Masanovich Construction Company , Inc . S ee page 11 K11 / J ( 20 ) DISTR I CT 1 F11e .. N ... n .... Con s ideration of re solutions aut horiz i ng acceptance o f LETIER t.'.'/L. L.. temporary Grants of E asement for construction of Interplant A/C -:JKLR .... Inf l uent Interc ep t or_, Job No . I -8; and authori zing payments (21 ) (2 2) as follows : Re s olu tion No . 7 2 -29 from Jane C . Aye r s i n the amount of $200 .00 . See page "L-1 11 Re sol ution No . 7 2 -39 from Deebl~ I nvestment Comp any in t he amo unt of $300 . 00 . See page 11 L-2 11 Resolution No . 7 2 -40 from Dorothy Constance Smith Reddens in the amount of $300 .00 . See page 11 L-3 '' any . ess and ~u nica~, if ~ ~ 23) DIS'rRICT 1 N\\~ Con s i de r a tion of motion to adjourn -4- (24 ) DISTRICT 2 _ Kl\ c Conside-ration of motion app r oving wa rrant s, if any . V\-.\ '=> See page "B" (~) DI S I CT ~---~---~ . . ""- "'-Othe bus in~ and ~un i c~n ~ any \~(26 ) DI STR I CT 2 . o t:-f\ \ Consi d erati on of moti o n to a dj o urn i ·. \ -\ DISTRICTS 5 & 6 . (27) v r--.\ \':;i ;"' \. r-f\ \ ':) Considerat i on of motion approvi ng Suspense Fund wa rr ant s, i f any . See page 11 B 11 /~f 28) DISTRICT 5 . FllE --~~..... Cons i deration of Resolution No . 72 -30., quitclaiming to 1mu .. Y. .... ··· c.. T h e Irvine Company a portion of District 's easement we .... T~ v /Originally acquired in connection wi th construction of ···-··········-··-·-( Bay Bridge Pumping Station, Contract No . 5 -1 2 , and --··-·····--.. ~ \~29) t----N\\S no longer needed by the District . See page "M 11 DISTRIC'r 5 Considera t i on of motion See page 11 B11 , approving wa r ra.nts , if any . (30"'-DISTRIC 5 \ · ~th e r bu i ne ss ~ ~cP 1 i DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~ : d._ 0 (32) DISTRICT 6 onsideration ~otion approv~warrant ~ if any . s page "c 11 "'----J_, (33) D TRICT 6 ~- O"E er bus in ~nd commu ~i ons ,. i K,, any I ........ (3 4) DISTRI CT 6 ...--Consideration of mot i on to ad j ourn ~ ~ '2 d DISTRICTS 3 & 1 1 v"1' \s< 3s J M~S \36) (\'\ \$ Consideration of motion approving Suspense Fund warrants , if any . See page "B 11 onsidera -·on of motion ~-r oving ~rrants , ~f an~. P "c " ct~ ~ \ "\ See v--(38 ) DI STRICT 1 1 Cons ideration of motion to a d j o u r n -5- (39) DISTRICT 7 Consid-e ration of the following: . fl~ ............. ._ ... ,,,., tmfR ..... ~ A/C .... Tiell "" FILE ............. ., .. , LETIER ............ ., A/C ..•. TKLR •••• ftt.E ................. . ···············-··-~ lETIER ········N\ ~ A/C .... TKllt .... (a) ~ Resolution No . 72 -31 -7, au t horizing acceptance of Grant of Easement from Robert & Cynthia Alexand e r , at no cost to the District , r e lative to Ass e ssment Dist ri ct No . 1 . See page "N" (b) Res olution No . 72-32-7, allthorizing acceptance _ .~of Grant of Easement from Robert & Doris Devl in , ~ at no cost tq the District, r e lative to Assessme nt ( c ) f.-""""" District No . ·2 . Se e page 11 0 11 Resolut i on No. 72 -33-7, authorizing acceptance of Grant of Easement from Richard & Joann .Alkema, at no cost to the Di s tric t , r e lat ive to Assessment District No . 2 . Se e page "P11 f ~L E ······••H•'"'""' (d) Resolution No. 72 -34 -7, authorizing acceptance LETI ER .. f/. . .,, A/C .... TKLR ... , ----····---·-·······,, I r--·---------~---· of Grant of Easement from Irvine Industrial Compl e x, at no cost t o t h e District , re l ative to sewer main i n Al ton· ~ven ue b etween Jam b oree and Von Karman . See page 11 Q11 DISTRIC T 7 Con s i de r ati o n of motion approving warra nts , if any . Se e p age 11 C" DISTRICT 7 Othe r business and communic a tions , i f a ny r~ ', -'2/ "-\ 5:. (}0 cf' . /(4 2 ) DI ST RIC T 7 '-"""'" Con~i de rat ion of mo t i o n to adj ourn FiU ................. (43) DISTRI CT 3 mm ············~ \. Cons i d e ration o f mo t ion approv ing Add e ndum No . 1 to we .... TKLR M, \~ the p l ans and spe cif ic a t ion s f o r .Knott Inte rc ept or, --··-·············-~ v ~~~;~:~~ ~~~I t~7' s~~c~~~~rat~~* State Division of I ' _______ ............ .. (4 4 ) DIS TRICT 3 :~.;~z ~ s A/C •••• TKLR ••• \ \ Consid erati on of Re solut ion No . 72 -35-3, authoriz i n g exe cution o f Co ns e nt to Conveyance o f po rt i on of Distri ct eas eme nt orig inally acquired from U. S . Navy i n connection with Se al Be a c h Boul e v a rd Pump Station, to Sou t h e rn ···-··-···········--V Califo rnia Edis on for underg round el ec tri cal se r v ic e . "S '' ··-----.•····-------See p age (45) DI STR ICT 3 FILE .•. M.A...... ._/Consi de ration o f motion to r e c e ive and file Noti ce to LETTER .#/J._ ~ Wi thh old s u bmi tte d b y I n l and Con crete En t e rpri se s , Inc ., A/c ::::TKLR i\I\ S a g ains t Me r co Const r u c t i o n Co ., Contrac tor for Beac h ...... .=......... · Re l i e f Tru n k Sewe r , Re a che s 17 ?-. 1 8 and 19 , Cont ract ······==-······-No . 3-16 , in the amount of $1,?:5 34 .44 ( 46 ) DIS1'R I CT 3 Co n sider at i on o f Res o l u tio n No . 72 -36 -3, a uthori zing FILE ······:-7· .. -\ execution of ag r eement with Midway City Sanitary Dist rict LETIER .Y ...... :\\ ':J providing f o r abandonm e nt of Sanitary Dist r i c t se we r A/C ••.• TKtR ••• ~\ _ ./ to faci litat e const r ue t·i on of Knott Inte r cep t or , Co n tra.c t v--"T'' No . 3-17. See page ----- -6- .. 0 • (47) DIST RICT 3 Con sid e ration of r eque st of City of We stminster fo r joint construction of p ropo sed Balsa Relief Trunk S ewe r and City 's s torm drain facilities i n Bo lsa Avenue between Magnol i a and Newl and 1llf ···········•"''\\ ~ / lETIER u•••uunm A/C .... TKLI .... ____ ,,,,,. h FILE .............. ,. .. ~ LETIER .......... ,.,. A/C .... TKLR .... I ·-··-•••·••oouoooooof' r Consid e ration of motion to receive and file l ett e r from City of Westmins t er , dated February 29 , 1972, r equesting joint const r uction ~of propo sed Balsa Relief Trunk Sewe r and City 's storm drain f~cilities in Ba l sa Ave nue between Magnol ia and· Ne wl a nd . See page -'~'·I~I '-'~~- (b) Consideration of Resolut ion No . 7 2 -37-3, approving a nd aut h ori z ing for execution an . . ~ag r eement with City of Wes tmins te r .for }oint Vi'" construction of prop o s ed Balsa Relie f Trunk Sewer and City 's storm drain facilities (c ) v :in Ba l sa Avenue b etween Magnol i a and Ne wland . See page 11 y 11 Consideration of motion authorizing the Ge neral Manager to request a prop osal fr om Boyl e Enginee ring , District 's consulting engineers,for services in connection with de s ign of p r oposed Ba lsa Re lief Trunk Sewer and City 's sto rm drain facilities in Balsa Avenue betwe e n Magnolia and Newland . FILE .... 6/.- LETT ER .... ~ 4 8 ) ;DISTRICT 3 A/C .... TKLR ..• \ v Cons i d e ration of motion a u tho r izing increase in max i mum I /\I\ S f ee to Conv e rs e , Davis and Associates from $8 , 500 to -··-·········+l $10, 056, for soils invest i gation r eport fo r Knott ---··-·-··-·-Interceptor, Contract No . 3 -17 . See pag e 11 \1/11 Q DISTRICT 3 . . ~ Di scussion of proposed consolidation of Sanitation District No . 4 . Se e page ''X" . ...(50 ) DI ST RICT 3 (11 /s l...-"' Conside ration of motion approving warrant s , if any · (51) k sTRICi\3 \_ '\ othe r ·buhlne ss cl:rrd commurN...catio~, if~y t/i( 52 ) DI STRICT 3 Consideration of motion to ad j ourn 8'.'S r[J -7 - II MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 l 0844 Ellis Aven'ue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: of Orange County, California \ I , JOINT BOARDS REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, March 8, 1972 7:30 p.m. Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 March 3, 1972 The following is a brief explanation of the more important non- routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory . Warrant lists are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but will appear in the comple,te agenda .available at, the meeting. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Joint Boards No. 5 -REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN: Ch a irman Just met with Washington offic ials in mid-February as a follow up to the productive January effort s of Director Griset, to explain our Districts' position con- cerning the pending Federal legislation on water pollution control . A memor andum from Chairman Just was mailed to all Director s on F ebruary 29. Nos. 8 and 9 -REPORT OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Al\TD ACTIONS ON COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATIONS: The Committee met on the evening of February 29 "'n th Supervi s or Cl ark as a g u est . A report of the meeting, together with recomm endations to the Joint Board, is being mailed ~~th this report. Item No. 9 (a through f) is consideration of actions recommended by the Committee to the Joint Board. No. 10 -CONSENT CALENDAR: The following agenda items fall into this category in accordance with the definition e s tablishe d by the Bo a rds: (a) Ap roval of Plans and Specifications f'or Plant Job NO. P2-20 Powe r Rel:i.abili ty ProJ ecf at: Pl ant: No . :[1 -The next schedu ed contra:ct to be awa rd ed under the 19 71-72 Plant expansion and i mp rov ements budget is a job consisting wholly in upg rading and reinforcing our electrical distribut ion system at Plant No. 2 . It is strictly an electrical contrac t and will include the insta llation of a new 1,000 KVA transformer. The engineer's estimate for the con- struction work is $350,000, for which a n 80% Fed e r a l and State grant application is curre ntly being processed. Bids will be opened on April 6, ·with award scheduled in May. ~-J (b) (c) ; . I (d) (e) Quarterly Audit Reports -Our independent auditors, Hanson, Peterson, Cowles and Sylvester, have advised that. they are mailing directly to the Directors the required quarterly reports for the first two quarters of 1971-72. The staff will be prepared to answer any questions the Directors may have on these reports. Ch ange Order No. 2, Jobs No. J-12 and J-7-2 -This contract, for an additi on to the administrative office building and 'the ' new vehicle maintenance building, is progressing satis- factorily. During the first few months of construction the nec ess ity f or certain changes in the work became obvious. We are r ecommending the adop tion of Change Order No. 2 for the additional amount of $3,932 .11 for thi s extra wo rk, as detailed on the change order included with the agenda material. Most of this sum is for a new fire hydrant required by the City of Fountain Valley. Extension of' Training Program -In January, 1971, the Boards approved coope rating with an Envirorunental Protection Agency sponsored training program administered by Orange Coas t College to provide on-site work experience for enlisted servicemen soon to be discharged. The actual administrat ion and classroom instruct ion is conducted by the College staff and the Districts me rely mak e available our Plant fac ilities for a maximum of 1 2 men, at no cost to the Districts. This program has been advantage ous since the trainees spend 20 hours per week working productively with our crews. We recommend that this program be extended for one more year. Purchas e of Rep l acement Conveyor Belt -During the past few weeks deterioration of the long conveyor belt at the sludge dewatering operation at Plant No. 1 has become evident . Since _there is a 6 to 8 week delivery tim.e on tW.s item we wish to expedite acquisition of a new belt and I accord- ingly recommend that the staff be authorized to award a contract to the lowest responsible bidder immediately after bids are opene d, for an amount not to exceed $3,200. No. 12 -INTERDISTRICT AGREEMENT CONCERNING WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DI SPOSAL REVENUES FR OM CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT AGREEMENT: In conne ction with t h e agreements described under Items 9(a) and (b), we are recommending that a ll Districts enter into an agreement fo r allocation of funds derive d from the sale of Plant c apacity to the Chino District. This agreement i s very similar to the one entered into in June of 1970 in connection with the now termina ted agreement with the Ri verside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District . It further provides that District No. 2 will have the use of all of the payment of $1,625,000 for the initial 5 mg d capacity pu:r.chased to aid in the construction of the Santa Ana River Int e rce pt or until it i s c ompleted, after wh ich the other Districts will be r epaid in accordance with their current Pl ant equity percentages. District No. 2 may elect to pay tlle other Di stricts the funds due them f or the initia l 5 mgd capacity right under this agreement in four annual installments at 6% interest . -2- No. 13 -CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO JOB NO. I-8: This recommended change order will add $89,600 to the cost of the contract for the Interplant Influent Interceptor, now well under way, but will save much more than that amount in future construction. This proposed change will reroute the Euclid Trunk in Ellis Avenue to connect with the existing Ellis Avenue Force Main at the · same time the Interplant Interceptor is being constructed in Ellis Avenue, thereby eliminating an addition al excavation job in Ellis Avenue, when the Plant No. 1 influent metering and diversion structure (Job No. I-8-3) is constructed this year. The engineers and staff are recommending that the Euclid Trunk diversion line, which can be used in the future for diverting waste- water from District No. 3 to the new metering structure, be installed simultaneously by the Interpla nt Influent Interc e ptor contractor. The contractor h a s quoted a price of $89,600 for thi s ~ddition a l work, which the sta ff considers rea son able. Since both the Inte r plant Influe nt Interceptor and the me tering structure will be 80 % ftinded by State a nd Federal g r ants, the staff h a s contacted represent atives of the State Water Res ourc e s Control Bo a r d and has been assured that the change order will be a pproved for · 80 % fundi~g. _- No. 14-ATT END ANCE AT CALIFORNI A ~'WAT ER roi.LUTION ~ONTROL ASSOCIATION CO NFER ENCE IN S OUTH LAKE 'I'AH01~7 -8-AJ.:Z .. SGJTil.fLA, FROM MAY 3 TO 6: This annual confe r e nce is being he l d 'thi s year jointly with the Nevada Wa te r Pollution Contro l Ass ocia tion. For ma ny years it h a s been customary to aut horize a number o f employees t o a tt e nd the se annua l c onferenc e s and we fe e l tha t s u c h a t tenda.l1.c e h as be en ben eficial to the Distr icts in. ac qu a i nt,ing o ur pers onne l with pra ctic e s and proc edures of othe r agencie s as we ll as new de v e lopment s i n the wa ter p ollution cont rol f i e ld. Many o f our e mp loyee s a r e a c tive ·i n t h e Sant a Ana Rive r Ba sin Se ction o f this org aniz a tion a s memb e rs or officers and have a genuine interes t in the s e me e ting s. It i s recommend e d that a uthoriz a tion be g i ven to desi g nate t e n Districts' emp loy e e s to a tt e nd t h is me e ting , with fees a nd expens es paid. Funds for this activity have been include d in the current fi sc al budg et. District No. 1 No. 19 -CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO CONTRACT NO. 1-12: This contra ct, Ma in-Dy·er I n t e rc e ptor, i s ne a ring comple tion and will be op erationa l within a f ew weeks . Dur ing c onstruction a n undisclose d sewer latera l wa s encou n te r e d n e ce ssita ting t he contra ctor consi derab le exp ense to repla ce i t a nd caus i n g d o'tlm time. We a r e t herefo re r e comme nding this cha ng e orde r to add $1,050.59 to the contra ct fo r this extra work. I No. 20 -ACCE PTANCE OF TEMP ORARY EASEMENT S, JOB NO. I-8: For the construction o f the I .n t e rpla nt Inf luent Intercept or the t emp orary u s e of a portion of thr ee s ep a rat e p a rc e l s o f l and i s n e c e ssary . The st a ff has n eg otiated wj_th t h e l a ndown e rs to obt a in these e a s em ent s for the sum s indic ate d on the agenda . At the time o f this writing one of t he -3- grants of easement have been received and it is recommended it, a nd those received prior to the Board meeting, be accepted and payment authorized as shown. District No. 5 No. 28 -QUITCLAIM OF EASEMENT TO IRVINE COMPANY : Included with the agenda material is a letter to the General Counsel from the District's engineer r~co~ending quitclaiming of an easement ne a r the Bay Bridge obtained about five yea!s ago and riot used and no longe r needed. The General Counsel has prepared a quitclaim and we recommend its approval. District No. 7 No. 39 -ACCEPrANCE OF GRANTS OF EASEMENT: Easements have been obtained from four separate landowners for sewer construction and we recommend their acceptance at no cost to the District. District No. 3 No. 43 -ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO CONTRACT NO. 3-17: Bids for this $6.25 million project, Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1, and Reaches 2 and 3, will be op e ned the day after the Board meet i ng . A description of the work was given in an earlier agenda report. At the time these specifications were released we had not yet obtained a necessary permit from the State Division of Highways for work in the San Diego Freeway right of way. This permit has now been received and it is necessary to send a n addendum to the bidders incorporating its provisions. No. 44 -APPROVAL OF GRANT OF EASEMENT BY NAVY TO EDISON COMPANY : The Department of the Navy requires the District 's approval for an easement to the Edison Company for power servj_ce for the newly completed Seal Beach Boulevard Pump Station. No. 45 -NOTICE TO WITHHOLD, CONTRACT NO. 3-16: The work on this contract, as noted in l as t month's r eport, is now complet e but the staff is still attempting to resolve a controversy with the contractor over his claim for additional comp e n sation for extra compaction wo r k he maintains was not required by the specifications . In the meantime , a Notice to Withho l d from a subcontractor h as been rec eived and to make this claim a matter of record, the action indicated on the agenda is recomm ende d. No. 46 -AGREEMENT WIT H MIDWAY CITY SANITARY DISTRICT RE CONSTRUCTION OF CONTRACT NO . 3-17: The plans for this contract (see Item No. 43) r equire removal of a local sewer owned by the Sanitary District. Ra the r than reroute this loc a l sewer, an arrangeme nt has been worked out with the Sanitary District 1 to allow us to r em ove it comp l etel y if District No . 3 will agree to provide equivalent sewer service fo r the area which may be served by the loc a l sewer. Since there is a good possibility that this sewer will b e ad,jacent t o a future park betwee n Newland Av enue and the proposed Huntington Be a ch Freeway, this service may never have to be provided . The staff has prepared a simple agreement to this effect w·hich has already b ee n e xecuted by the Sani - tary District and we recommend its app r oval b y District No . 3. -4- v • No. 47 -JOINT CONSTRUCTION OF A SEWER ·AND STORM DRAIN IN BOLSA AVENUE: A letter on this subject from the City ·or Westminster is included in the agenda material and is self-explanatory. Since the joint construction of this District master plan sewer and the City's storm drain will be to both parties' financial advantage and avoid two street construction projects within a short interval, we recommend the action indicated on the agenda. No . 48 -INCREASE IN MAXIMUM FEE FOR SOILS INVESTIGATION: Included in the agenda material is a memorandum from the Deputy Chief Engineer on this subject, which we believe is self-explanatory. I recommend authorization to increase the fee to the soils engineering firm, as indicated on the agenda. No. 49 -DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED CONSOLIDATION WITH DISTRICT NO. 4: We have asked the City Manager of Seal Beach to submit all avai lable material concerning their proposed consolidation of District No. 4 with District No. 3. The enclosed City memorandum, dated March 2, and attachments will be the subject of the discussion under this agenda item. We propose to review this matter in depth as staff representa- tives from the City will be present to answer any questions the Directors may have. We do not anticipate that any formal action will be taken at Wednesday's meeting as this is a fact finding session. We have asked our General Counsel to review the proposed c onsolidation agreement and be prepared to comment on its various provisions. Included with the agenda material is a staff memorandum to our counsel listing some of our questions concerning the proposed agreement. -5- Fred A. Harper General Manager DI STRIC T 1 DISTRICT 2 DISTRICT 3 _L GRISET _L BATTIN ~ MILLER _v _ PORTER / SMITH ~ CHRISTIE ~ CLARK) ROBT ~ CULVER ~ FINNELL ~ HERRIN _.'L_ JUST _a_ PHILLIPS _k:: SIMS ~ STEPHENSON _lL_ WEDAA ~ WINN _L_ HYDE (HERRIN) (CASPERS) (coco) (HILEMAN) (ROOT) (JACKSON) (GOMEZ) (GR I SET) (HARPER) (CASPERS) iZUNIGA) DUTTON) MACHADO) (SCHNIEPP) DISTRICTS e>Jl_Q ---":o...::::;_~---- JOINT BOARDS \7 JUST ~BAKER _k'.'.'._ BATT I N v . BERTON ~CASPE RS __ ~CHRISTIE __ v CLA RK ) ROBT __ _L__ CLARK) RALPH ~ COEN -.. -/ CULVER ___L_ DAVIS .V. FINNELL ·./ QUIGLEY _L__ GREEN ~ GRISET ~HARPER (HARPER) (C ASP ERS) {CASPERS) (WEST RA) (ROOT) (JACKSON) (CASPERS) (FONTE~ (GOMEZ; (FISCHBACH) (MC CRACKEN) ((HERRJN) ~ BATTIN ~ BERTON _:::::::__ CHRISTIE ~ CLARK) ROBT ~ CULVER ((KROES EN) CAS PERS) (WESTRA) (ROOT) (JACKSON) __ ___L_ HARVEY -V HEMEON ~HER R IN .v; HIRTH ~HOLDEN _L HYDE I v MC INNIS -... -. ~MCWHINNEY JUST) (KANEL) (LEWIS) (GR I SET) (CROUL) (HOGARD) (K ROESEN) (HIRTH) (coco) ;;:-DAVIS GR EEN __ HARPER _L HAR VE Y _L HERRIN _L HEMEON -1L_ HOLDEN _iL_ MC WHINNEY _L_ S IMS _L STEPHENSON DISTRI CT 5 ----~ PARSONS ---_a_ CASPERS ----~HIRTH DISTRICT 6 lllSIIllC.1.1 _L PORTER _a__ CASPERS __ V MC INNI S (FONTE) (MC CRACKEN) (JUST) (KA N EL) (GR I SET) (LEYH s ) (BAR NES) (ZU NIGA) (DUTTON) (CROUL) (HIRTH) ~MILLER ~ ~LA Rf~J --l:lR I SE T ___J.c::_ P 0 RT ER _..iL._ QU ! GLEY _ V' ROGERS __J,L_ SM I TH (coco) RALPH (CASPERS) (HERRIN) I DI"STRICT 11 v SHIPLEY ~BAK E R __ COEN ~B ~O ___ A.SP S f" TCH -L (FI SCH~ACH) I, (HIRTH) (HILEMAN) 1 (MC CRAC!<EN) II (CASPER S) (GOLDBERG) OTHERS -. -MILLER _z_ PARSONS a PHILLIPS -_-PORTE R ~ ~ROGERS ~SHIPLEY ~SIMS --1::::::_ SMITH V STEPHENS ON V h'EDAA -V vJINN * * * * --· MITCHELL --BOY D V H/-1.RPER __ BROWN ~SYLVESTER .-L LEY.JIS _._DUNN ~CL.A Rl<E __ SIGL ER _L NISSON .:...__tL_ CRABB _IL'.._ TAYLOR -·-CARLSON _._F IN STER _. _GA LLOvvA Y _ _k{_ HOH EN ER _·_HO WA RD _tL HUNT =:;z=: KE I TH _. _L O~iRY _._._LY NCH _ MADDO X =z MARTINSO N __ MURONEY -~P I E RSA LL --STEV ENS ··-- (CASPERS) (HIRTH) (MC CRAC KEN) (Z UN I GA) (HI LEMAN ) (D UTTON) (MAC HADO) (SC HN IEPP) (GOLDBER G) V LI Afi).STRO M • ' ~- Chairman Just Report of the Joint Chairman Presentation of Service Award to Jack N. Ellis. Jack started to work for the Districts 15 years ago as Maintenance Operator. He is now Collection Facilities Foreman. Presentation of Grade IV Maintenance Certificates to the following employees who have successfully completed the prescribed course of study and passed the written examination of the California Water Pollution Control Association: ~k P. Johnson~ R. V. Ramirez J. A. Roberts Presentation of Grade II Maintenance Certificates to the following~ G"y Marsal~ ~J~ Presentation of Grade IV Water Pollution Control Plant Operator Certificates to the following: Michael Culbertson John P. Finias Tony Gutierrez William P. Hayden Donald E. Kinney Francisco Schultz •..... continued ••....... Presentation of Certificate of Completion to ~ennis E. Stephe~, Apprentice I, who has satisfactorily ---~-:-~--::--:-:--~~---completed the prescribed two year training curriculum in the field of waste water quality control with a minimum of three months of study and application in each of the following: Plant Maintenance, Collection Facilities Maintenance, Mechanical Maintenance, Electrical Maintenance, Treatment Plant Operations, Laboratory Procedures and General Engineering practices. Call meeting of the Executive Committee for 5:30 p.m., Tuesday, March 28th. Invite .Directors Wedaa and Winn to attend and participate in the discussions. M-E-M-0 -R-A-N-D-U-M TO~~~F~i~·1~e.;:;.....;M~em=..;;.o~r~a~n-d_um;;;-...~~~~~-DATE March 9 , 1972 FROM Georg ia SUBJE CT Di r ectors Telephone Rem i nders Director Caspe r s wa s c alled and remind ed of the Marc h 28th Executive Committee mee ting s i nce he was not in attendance at t he Joint Mee ting at which this meeting was announced. Ma yor De r elc l,ic i\hin n ey P . 0 . Box 8:.,7 Wes tminster _, C.:1.lifornio Dee r ~,,!a yor : Me rc h l7_, 1 9 7 2 Pur~i u ant t o y o ur j:equest pe rta ining t o t he d i s cus s ion .:i n d o ction t a l ;:en by t he Di strict No . 3 Board c o nce rning t he p rop osed c on- colidc.tion o i' District ~~o . 3 a nd Dis trict r o. 4 , t he f o llowing \10.e: p rc c~ded by t he r epo rt of t he .o t eff and t he Dlstrict 1 s lega l coun:::cl rc ~p o nd ing t o s e veral q ue:.;tions t hat He r e 1)osed b y t l!e ~n cl osed ~emorandwn: Di r ec tor t-c ~1h i nn ... y \.ha t t<;i l l t he s t a.ff .r e comm e u da tions b e c once rning t h i s p rop o sed con2olidotion? T he General t·1a n nge r r e s p onded : T he s t a ff b elieves t h is i :.; t he right t h ing to ~o . It fi t s int0 the Int erim Be cin Plan o f t ho Bt a t a i.c.t e r rl.esourc cs Cont1·01 Boa rd . Th is \:ill p ermit t he e limina tion o f the Sea l Be ec h Pla nt whic h p r esently dischar g es i nto t he S on Gubriel Riv e r e stua r y urea . Dll·ec t or lt.c \·,hinney Tt .. c p rop o ;;;a l zeems e c o nomically .. ise <3 nd t ner efo r e 1 mo v e t o ins tru ct t he s t an: to go ahe od a nd s tudy the f irn.1 nci a l a rra ngemen ts, plan s , e tc . fo r t he p rop os ed c onsolida t i on of District No . 4 with Dist rict r o. 3; a n d t ha t af t e r t he s t aff ha s a ccUlllu l a t e d t hic infonns t ion t ha t the y set up a me e ting of t h e Boa rds o f Dl ~tr ic t No . 3 a n d ~o . 4 a nd the Se al Bea c h Cit y Counc i l t o dis cuss t he iin.p l em.e nt a tion o f t he p ro p osed c o n s ol1do tion . Th e a bove a ction ~a s second e d a nd duly c a rried. F'.lH: g c Enclosure 4.";'!:£~ Gene r al Ma n a ger . I \ I ! l RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS March 8, 1972 -7:30 p.m. t' HARRANT NO. 17422 17423 17424 . ~ 25 ~26 17427 17428 17429 17430 17431 17432 17433 17434 17435 17436 17437 17438 17439 17440 17441 17442 17443 17444 17445 17446 17447 17448 17449 17450 17451 17452 17453 17454 17455 17456 17457 17458 17459 17460 17461 17462 17463 17464 17465 17466 17467 17468 17469 17470 17471 17472 r ·73 1~74 17475 17476 17477 17478 17479 17480 JOIHT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF R.P. Adams Company, Inc.,.Compressor Parts All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings Hilary Allison, Employee Mileage American Compressor Company, Engine Parts Ameron Corrosion Control Division, Cleaner City of Anaheim, Power Anaheim Builders Supply, Inc., Building Supplies Analytical Measurements, Inc., Test Equipment The Anchor Packing Company, Pump Packing Applied Science Laboratories, Lab Supplies Aquatic Center, Ecological Research Supplies Associated Concrete Products, Manhole Rings Azusa Western, Inc., Concrete Bank of America, Bond & Coupon Collection Beacon Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Bearing Specialty Company, Bearings John G. Bell Co., Conveyor Parts Benz Engineering, Inc., Compressor Parts James Benzie, Employee Mileage Blower Paper Co., Office Supplies Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Magneto Repairs Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams H.B.,Brown Co., Boiler Parts C & R Reconditioning Co., Equipment Repaira Cal-Glass for Research, In~., Lab Supplies California Association of Sanitation Agencies, Workshop Registration Fees California Collator Sales, Binding Supplies John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services Certified Laboratories, Inc., Solvents College Lumber Company, Inc., Building Materials & Supplies Consolidated Electrical Distr., Electrical Supplies Constructors Supply Co., Hardware & Tools Control Specialists, Inc., Regulator Parts Paul A. Cooper, Grit Hauling Copeland Motors, Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa County Water District, Water County of Orange, Maps Mr. Crane Company, Equipment Rental Charles P. Crowley Co., Freight Curtiri Scientific Co., Lab Supplies John M. Deck, Equipment Parts Deckert Surgical Co., First-aid Supplies De Guelle & Son's Glass Co., Equipment Repairs Denny's Refrigeration & Heating, Furnaces Diesel Control Corp., Filters Dominguez Marine & Industrial Supply Co., Valves Don's Wholesale Nursery, Landscaping E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., Manuals Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies & Forms Electric Supplies Dist. Co., Electrical Supplies Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Res~arch & Monitoring. Ensign Products Co., Lubricant Enterprise Printing Co., Specification Covers & Printing Everect Equipment Co., Ltd., Hardware Ferro Corp., Maintenance Supplies Fisher Scientific Co., Lab Supplies Foss Company, Foam Material William H. Fox, Employee Mileage Freeway Machine & Welding Shop, Machining A-1 AMOUNT 324.92 29.19 27.90 751.89 26.25 10.87 319.46 127.60 192.53 155.78 26.20 32.34 123.04 1,206.26 54.43 223.71 155.28 215.58 9.00 12.47 90.67 37.50 170.23 1,089.50 7.35 40.00 41.16 1,725.18 -80.99 492.58 871.14 619.77 26.15 1,056.00 33.10 6.oo 23.22 380.25 61.04 207.67 14.69 69.61 22.30 1, 758 .oo 145.82 1,183.31 131.46 23.89 364.59 1,237.90 3,270.00 105.53 243.28 81.90 29.87 72.57 21.00 13.50 409.95 ~ARRANT NO. 17481 17482 17483 17484 17485 ] 86 1~87 17488 17489 17490 17491 17492 17493 17494 17495 17496 17497 17498 17499 17500 17501 17502 17503 17504 17505 17506 17507 17508 17509 17510 17511 17512 17513 17514 17515 17516 17517 17518 17519 17520 17521 17522 17523 17524 17525 17526 17527 17528 17529 17530 17531 17532 17533 17534 17535 ] r-~36 1~37 17538 17539 17540 17541 17542 17543 IN FAVOR OF Fremont Bag, Drum & Salvage Co., Bags $ GAF Corporation, Blueprint Machine Repair Garden Grove Lumber & Cement Co., Building Materials Gasket Manufacturing Co., Inc., Gaskets Gelco Grouting Service, Equipment Rental General Electric Supply Co., Electrical Supplies General Telephone Co. of Calif. Georgia-Pacific Corp., Chlorine Graybar Electric Co., Inc., Electrical Supplies Hach Chemical Company, Inc., Test Materials. Hanson, Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester, Audit Services Hanson's Water Works Supply, Coupling Fred A. Harper, Various-Meeting & COD Expenses Harron, Rickard & McCone Co., Equipment Rental Hertz Equipment Rental Corp., Tools Hi-Fi Banner Co., Warning Signs Honeywell, Inc., Telemetering Supplies Howard Supply Company, Piping Supplies City of Huntington Beach, Water IKG Industries, Grating Industrial Water Conditioning, Equipment Rental International Harvester Co., Truck Parts J & M Service, Equipment Repair Jones Chemicals, Inc., Odor Control Chemicals Earle M. Jorgensen Co., Steel KAR Products, Inc., Hardware Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Piping Supplies King Bearing, Inc., Bearings Kingmann-White, Inc., Tubing Kleen-Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Rental Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Sweeper Parts Lasco Industries, Inc., Maintenance Supplies Judy Lee, Employee Mileage Lewco Electric Co., Equipment Parts Link-Belt, Grit Auger Parts (MO 1-12-72) Liquid Carbonic Corp., Lab Supplies Mc Calla Bros., Seals R.W. Mc Clellan & Sons, Inc., Building Materials Marko Products, Inc., Lab Supplies Mesa Supply, Engine Parts J.C. Meyer Glassblowing Service~-Lab Equipment Mine Safety Appliances Co., Test Equipment Moore Products Co., Controls E.B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Cover NCR, Data Processing Services Nalco Chemical Co., Chemicals Nashua Corp.~ Sales Tax National Bureau of Standards, Lab Supplies National Concrete Sawing, Inc., Core Drilling Newark Electronics Corp., Tools City of Newport Beach, Water C. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel Retainer Noland Paper Company, Inc., Reproduction Supplies Occidental College, Ecology Trawl Orange County Radiotelephone Pacific Pumping Company, Pump Parts Pacific Scientific Company, Controls Pacific Telephone Norman I. Parsons, Employee Mileage M.C. Patten & Co., Inc., Boiler Parts AMOUNT 138.60 295.97 278.52 157.11 1,134.oo 2,951.74 1,851. 38 1,468.38 777.52 18.66 962.50 9.00 171.69 176.38 14.18 56.70 457 .58 2,538.98 36.46 380.73 40.00 8.11 213.89 758.10 39.21 138.77 186.24 156.20 5.53 193.41 28.78 490.11 1,773.08 73.32 160.08 22.86 78.75 8,379.00 65.63 9.35 115.50 50.02 84.32 125.76 802.18 191.40 129.15 526.50 330.14 4.02 62.00 580.00 41.95 851.94 700.00 310.97 325.00 172.16 166.96 33.95 309.10 17.70 120.46 YARRANT NO. 17544 17545 17546 17547 17t:;48 1-49 lr?50 17551 17552 17553 17554 17555 17556 17557 17558 17559 17560 17561 17562 17563 17564 17565 17566 17567 17568 17569 17570 17571 17572 17573 17574 17575 17576 17577 17578 17579 17580 17581 17582 17583 17584 17585 17586 17587 IN FAVOR OF Postmaster $ Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage Bernard T. Redican, Employee Mileage The Register, Subscription Roseburrough Tool, Inc., Building Supplies & Materials San Bar, Ecological Research Supplies Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electrical Parts Sargent-Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies Scientific Glass Apparatus, Lab Supplies Scientific Products, Lab Supplies City of Seal Beach, Water S.F. Serrantino, Employee Mileage Sherwin-Williams Co., Paint Supplies John Sigler, Employee Mileage Signal-F1lash Co., Barricade Rental Singer Friden Division, Equipment Mtce. Agrmt. Smith Optical Service, Safety Glasses Soundcast Co., Casting Southern Calif. Edison Co. Southern Calif. Gas Co. Southern Calif. Water Co. Sparkletts, Bottled Water Speed-E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline & 011 Stoody Company, Pump Parts Surveyors Service Co., Survey Supplies Thomas Bros. Maps, Atlas Tony's Lock & Safe Service, Hardware Paul Torres, Employee Mileage Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Steel Harry L. Twining, Employee Mileage Tustin Water Works, Water Uarco, Inc., Forms Union Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline Vaniman Camera, Photo Processing & Supplies Wall Colmonoy Corp., Metal Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc., Engine Part·s Bob Webber, Employee Mileage Western Salt Company, Salt World Travel Bureau, Inc., Meeting Travel James Wybenga, Employee Mileage Xerox Corp., Reproduction Service Zodiac Paper Co., Printing & Reproduction Supplies , TOT.AL JOINT OPERATING A-3 AMOIDlT 500.00 31.86 82.62 16.50 167.37 84.41 105.55 54.~ 445.t5l 152.77 100.34 10.65 29.46 405.32 13.05 216.26 28.50 67.00 555.67 15,872.86 1,654.70 3.39 49.99 311.10 1,959 .28 585.81 4.28 59.97 47.09 7.05 599 .38 22.35 123.06 608.84 20.71 44.74 325.50 683.11 8.10 96.08 7.60 19.05 787.50 374.79 80,375.08 WARRANT NO • 17588 17589 l 7'590 :~91 r7592 17593 17594 17595 17596 17597 17598 17599 17600 17601 17602 17603 17604 17605 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Anaheim"Dodge, Truck (MO 11-10-71) $ Jane C. Ayres, Temporary Easement I-8 Carollo and Keith, Survey I-8 John Carollo Engineers, Engineering -Plant Constr. Dayton & Bakewell, Tools Deeble Investment Co., Tempora~y Easement I-8 E.T.I. & Kordick, Contractor P2-ll-1 Freeman Electric Construction Co., Contr. Pl-6-1 Dorothy Constance Smith Reddens, Temporary Easement I-8 J. Putnam Henck, Contractor P2-17 J.E. Hoagland & W.W, Hoagland, Contractor P2-19 Kordick & Rados, Contractor I-8 B.H. Miller Construction Co., Contr. J-7-2/J-12 Newark Electronics Corp., Test Equipment Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Pipe Testing I-8 Transport Clearings, Freight Twining Laboratories, J-12, P2-19, P2-ll-l F.T. Ziebarth Company, Inc., Contractor Pl-3-1, Pl-1R-l/P2-1R-l AMOUNT 3,720.26 200.00 3,811.50 23,661.56 439.95 300.00 99,468.oo 16,329.79 300.00 69,872.40 110,640.00 592,586.19 97,235.39 414.23 2,512.50 19.23 97.30 32,960.90 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING $1,054,569.20 , TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF $1,134,944.28 A-4 DISTRICT NO. 2 WARRANT NO. ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 17608 17609 17610 17611 17612 Lowry & Associates, Engineering 2-14 Security Title Insurance Co.,Title Report 2-14 DIS~RICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS . IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Survey 3-16, Engineering 3-18 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-16 DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Converse, Davis & Associates, Soil Investigation 3-16 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF City of Newport Beach, January Connection Adm. Chg. FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT $· 7' 215. 50 30.00 $ 7,245.50 $ $ $ 5,307.50 680.26 3,556.00 76.00 Shuirman-Simpson, Engineering 5-18 & Relocation Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer at Promontory Point $ 1,110.00 17613 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND WARHANTS IN FAVOR OF Shuirman-Simpson, Engineering 5-19 -B- $ 1,186.00 $ 10,209.51 WARRANT NO. 17614 ~ ~15 ~ 17616 17629 17630 17631 17632 17617 17618 17619 17620 17621 17622 17623 17624 17625 17626 17627 17628 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND \!TARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services--Plan Check Irvine Industrial Complex, Insp. Fee Refund ACCID~JLATED CAPITAL OUTIAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering 7-5-lR CONSTRUCTION FUND WARRAI'rrs IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Survey 7-6-3 and 7-6-4 Colich Construction Co., Contractor 7-6-3 Northern Contracting Co., Contractor 7-6-4 Osborne Laboratories, Inc.,Pipe Testing 7-6-3,7-6-4 FIXED OBLIGATION FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF City of Anaheim, Annual JOS Payment City of Buena Park, Annual JOS Payment City of Fullerton, Annual JOS Pay~ent Garden Grove Sanitary District, Annual City of La Habra, Annual JOS Payment City of Orange, Annual JOS Payment City of Placentia, Annual JOS Payment City of Santa Ana, Annual JOS Payment DISTRICTS NOS. 1 & 7 SUSPENSE FlJl'ID WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF JOS Payment Boyle Engineering, Engr. Serv. & Survey 7-6-2 & 1-12 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 7-6-1,7-6-2 & 1-12 Mike Masanovich Construction Co.,Inc., Contractor 1-12 Ernest E. Pestana, Inc., Contractor 7-6-2 -C- $ AMOUNT 83.92 589.50 $ 673.42 $ 4,746.oo $ 1,183.00 102,782.97 176,680.13 4,062.50 $ 284,708.60 $ 1,561.80 96.70 1,561.80 241.80 386.90 1,474.70 241.80 4,434.50 $ 10,000.00 $ 300,128.02 $ 338.25 576.61 10,656.53 90,877.00 $ 102,448.39 RESOLUTION NOo·72-25 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGFBEMENT BETWEEN DISTRICT NOo 2 AND THE CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION, SUBJECT TO CERTAIN CONDITIONS, OF AN AGREEivIBNT BETWEEN DISTRICT NOo 2 AND THE CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, ENTITLED "WASTEWATER INTERCEPTOR CAPACITY AGREEMENT, TO PROVIDE SEWER SERVICE TO AN AREA LOCATED OUTSIDE THE DISTRICTS * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, it appears in the best interest of the public health, safety and welfare for County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, to enter into an agreement with Chino Basin Municipal Water District, to permit said Chino Basin Municipal Water District to dispose of wastewater through the facilities of District No. 2, into the joint treatment and disposal facilities of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,.5, 6, 7, and 11; and, WHEREAS, the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement between said Sanitation Districts, dated Marcb 10, 1971, as amended, provides that each Sanitatio~ District, which is a party thereto, must approve the use of joint treatment and disposal facilities or any part thereof for the disposal of sewage and/or industrial wastes originating outside the territorial limits of said Districts; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED: Section 1. That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, hereby authorizes the execution of an agreement entitled "Wastewater Interceptor Capacity Agreement", dated -----------------, with the Chino Basin Municipal Water District, subject to the conditions contained in Section 3 hereof o Agenda Item #9(a) D-1 All Dist2"icts Section 2. That the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, hereby approve the execution of said agreement by County. Sanitation District No. 2, and authorize endorsement thereof by their respective Chairmen and Secretary. Section 3. That final execution of said agreement, as authorized herein, shall be ~ubject to the prior execution of an agreement between said County Sanitation Districts, providing for allocation of funds payable by Chino Basin Municipal Water District under the terms of the concurrent agreement between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, and the Chino Basin Munici- pal Water District entitled 11 Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Agreement" dated--------- PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1972. Agenda Item #9(a) All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 72-26 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AND THE CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION, SUBJECT TO CERTAIN CONDITIONS, OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN SAID DISTRICTS AND THE CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT ENTITLED "WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL AGREEMENT", TO PROVIDE TREATMENT AND. DISPOSAL SERVICE TO AN AREA LOCATED OUTSIDE THE DISTRICTS * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, it appears in the best interests of the public health, safety and welfare for County Sanitation Districts Nos. , 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, to enter into an agreement with the Chino Basin Municipal Water District, to provide for treatment and disposal of wastewater from said District by means of the joint facilities of said County Sanita- tion Districts; and, WHEREAS, the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement between said Sanitation Districts, dated March 10, 1971, as amended, provides that each Sanitation District, which is a party thereto, must approve the use of joint treatment and disposal facilities or any part thereof for the disposal of sewage and/or industrial wastes originating outside the territorial limits of said Districts; and, WHEREAS, said Sanitation Districts have heretofor approved Wastewater Interceptor Capacity Agreement between County Sanitation District No. 2 and Chino Basin Municipal Water District to permit disposal of wastewater by Chino Basin Municipal Water District through the facilities of District No. 2; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED: Agenda Item #9(b) E-1 All Districts Section 1. That the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos~ 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, hereby authorize execution of "Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Agreement", with Chino Basin Municipal Water District, dated ~~~~~~~~~ , subject to conditions contained in Section 2 hereof. Section 2. That final execution of said agreement, as authorized herein, shall be subject to the prior execution of an agreement between said County Sanitation Districts providing for the allocation of funds payable by Chino Basin Municipal Water District under the terms of said "Wastewater Treatment and Disposal .Agreement" with Chino Basin Municipal Water District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1972. I Agenda Item #q(b) E-2 All Distrtcts ·' RESOLUTION NO. 72-27 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE ORAJJGE COTJHTY WATER DISTRICT 15 MGD SECONDARY TREA'I1ED WATER F10R THEIR RECLAMATION FACILITY Al~D THE RIGHT To· DISCHARGE A LIKE AMOUNT TO SANITATION DISTRICT FACILIT~Es· A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOSo 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT TO PROVIDE 15 MGD SECONDARY TREATED WATER FOR ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT'S RECLAMATION FACILITY AND THE RIGHT TO DISCHARGE 15 MGD OF SALT BRINES AND OTHER RESIDUAL MATERIAL TO SANITATION DISTRICT FACILITIES * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain agreement dated March 8, 1972, between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County and Orange County Water District, to provide 15 mgd of secondary treated water for said Water District's reclamation facility and the right for Water District to discharge 15 mgd of salt brines and other residual material to Sanitation Districts' facilities, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That County Sanitation District No. 1, acting as agent for its elf and,, County Sani ta ti on Dj.stricts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, · 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, is hereby authorized to enter into said agreement with Orange County Water District; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1972. Agenda Item #9(c) -F-All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 72-28 APPTI0\7ING PLANS JOB NO. P2-20 "'·m 1 i. J. 'l.lJ SPECIFICATIONS FOR A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOSo 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, Alm 11, OP ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-20 ' * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Noso l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOL'\TE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract docwnents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by John Carollo Engineers for construction of Power Reliability Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-20, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2o That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Sa.fety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m., April 6, 1972, a.t which time they will be publicly opened and read; and, , Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors; and, Section 5. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized to award contract for said work on behalf of these Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held 8, 1972. Agenda Item #lO(a) -G-All Districts P. 0. E:)Z 3~27 -1 CJ:.~~~ ::lli s ,:, '1e:·~~.:0 Fount.:!in V<3lley, Califon:ic:! 92708 ·. C .O. NO. 2 CON'l'RACTOR: B. II. MILL EI~ co;,JS'fltUCTION co:.fPANY D!~TE: n~rch 8 J 1972 Ad1:linisrratT0!1-Engi11gcen.l1g .t3uilding ACllrition, Jo.b J·fo. J-.7-2 & JOB ; V chic 1 e Ha int en~ n c e Fa c i 1 it i e s , ·Job r~ o . J -1 2 Amount of this change order (ADD) (~EDN~~) $ __ 3_,,_7-._;8 __ 2;...;:; • ...;..;l;.;;,;l'-_ In accordance with contract·provisions, the following changes.in the contract nnd/or contrc:ct work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following addition~ to or deductions from the contract-price are hereby approved. · REFERENCES: Districts' ~orrespondcnce date~: Nov. 24, 1971, Dec. 3, 1971, Dec. 10-;-l~c. 21, 19/r;!Jec. 27, 1971, Dec. 27, 1971, Jan. 12, 1972, Jan. 20, 1~72, Jan. 21~ 1972, Jan. 26, 1972. Contractor's correspondence dated: Nov. S, 1971, Nov. 15, I~TI-;-Dcc. 1~/T, Dec. r~~f'Tl, Dec·. 20, 1971, Ja!1· 4, 1972, Jan. 21, 1972. Contractor's Change Order Estimates J-7-2 No. 3, 5 and 6 J-12 No. 2 and 6. Twin~ Laboratories' Invoices No. 25841 and 25857 Drawing No. RS-1 J-7-2 Dra\·:ings No. E-1, Rev. ..1 and 2. , E-3, Re·v. 1 and 2· , E-4, Rev. l; A-7, Rev. · l; A-2, Rev .1;. A-·s, Rev. 1; A-6, .Rev. 2. , A-9, Rev.2; S-2, Rev. 1; S-3, Rev. 1 . , f.1 .. 2, Rev.l; Detail A, Sheet 3.10. J-12 Drawing No. A-1-A City of Fountain Valley Requirements dated Decerabcr 8, 1971. ADD ~ l. Revise and expand area 'lighting at new Vehicle storage and parking areas to match existing parking area. Add 2. Install fire hydrant.as required by the City of Fountain Valley at entry to Vehicle Maintenance Facilities. Add 3.· Relocate walls, add electrical fixtur~s, delete partitions and expand office space at Administration Engineering Building Addition. Add 4. Install water conservation plumbing fixtures. Add S. Add fence at North entrance and change electrical switchgear to improve quality and provide archi- tectural appcarance·a· · Add ·Total Add 789.37 2,320.12 442.75 283.27 96.60 $3,932.11 A~enda Item #lO(c) H-1 All Districts .· Cl-I/\ NGE ORDER . C .O. NO-~~ CC!J1ti1~_c..,_,c~l _ corfrR.:'"'.C1 10R: B. I-L l'.Jl LLER CO:!ST!:UCfI o~~ C0~·1PL\i~Y DATE: Ma re h s 19 7 2 A c.lii1i n i s tr at 1 on -L n g i n c c n. n g }fo i 1 <l i n g Ad tl i t ion s , Jo b No • J -7 -z & J·oB: Vehicle I·iaintcn~nce F2.cilitjcs·,_J_o_b_N_'o_. _J_~_l_2 _______ _ Amount of this change order (ADD) (~TIUC.:::i.{) $ __ 3-N,_7_8 .,;.;.;.-2 .x_,;;;f l;;;..;;::1:..---_ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes.in the contract and/or contract \·JOrk are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or detjuctions from the contract~price are hereby approved. DEDUCT --i-.-Cost of overtime soil testing and added compaction tests as requested by contractor, but paid for by the Districts on November 6th and 15, 1971. EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME Deduct Total Deduct TOTAL THIS CHANGE ORDER ADD As a result of inclement weather and 1·.·et conditions $ s 150.00 Iso.oo 3,782.11 extend the contract time for both structures 12 calendar days. Due to Teamster strike and pickets extend the contract time for both _structures 21 calendar da'ys. Due to unknown conditions and added work as noted above extend the contract time for both ~tructur~s 30 ~alendar days. TOTAL EXTEUSION OF CONTRACT TH1E ••••• 63 calendar da~ SUMMARY: Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date J-7-2 Oct.1~1971 210 calendar days May 12, 1972 Time Extension This Change Order Total Extension of Contract Time Revised Contract Time 63 ·calendar days 63 calendar days 273 calendar days July 14, 1972 Revised Co11~pletion pate Original Contract Price Prev .. Au th. Changes This Change (ADD){~~~) Amended Contract Price ~Board authorization date: Approved: J-12 Oct.--i:-s:-1971 120 calendar days Feb. 12, 1972 63 calendar days 63 calendar days 183 calendar days April 15, 1972 $ 477,500.00 $ ___ -.... o--~- $_--:3~,~z_;::s'""""2c..a. • .-.1_1 __ $ 481,282.11 March 8, 1972 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer WILLIA!'l P. FICKER, AIA B. H. MILLER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY By---------------------------------~ A7cnd~ Item #lO(c) H-2 All Districts RESOLUTION NOa 72-38 APPROVING INTER-DISTRICT AGREEMENT RE ALLOCATION OF REVENUES UNDER AGREEMENT WITH CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FOR WASTEWATER DISPOSAL I • A JOINT RESOLUTION-OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOSo 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN SAID DISTRICTS FOR ALLOCATION OF REVENUES FROM CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated , -------- between County Sanitation District No. 2, and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, providing for allocation of revenues from Chino Basin Municipal Water District under the terms of agreements entitled "Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Agreement" and "Wastewater Interceptor Capacity Agreement", is hereby approved in form prepared by the General Counsel; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of their respective Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a 1regular meeting held March 8, 1972. Agenda Item #12 -I·-All Districts cou:~TY Sl\:H'l:".7!~~; Dl:~T~:.rc:-s OF G:~ .. ;r:G:~ ccu:.TY P. 0. BOX 3l27 -10[4U ~llis Ave~ue Fountain Valley, Califorr.ia 92708 CHAUGE ORDER . ·. C .o·. NO. 2 --------- CONTRACTOR: KORDICK AND RADOS, A JOINT VENTURE JOB: INTERPLANT INFLUENT INTERCEPTOR, JOB NO. I-8 DATE: __ ~M_a_r_c_h~8~, __ 1_9_7_2 ____ _ Amount of this change order (ADD) (~~~~~~) '" 89,600.00 -t> _____ _ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are _hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. · REFERENCE: John Carollo Engineer's letter of December 9th, 1971. ADD Contractor's letter to the Districts on January 7th, 1971. The Contractor is _hereby directed to construct the 36" RCP concrete force main as shown in revision #1 on Sheets 22, 23, 44 and 45, dated Dec. 7, 1971, of the contract plans. This work was to have been included in a future contract but is required for the bypassing· of sewage during construction of the the future project and also to eliminate the congestion which this work .would cause ov~r and above the congestion caused by the subject contract. Work shall b~ accomplished for a negotiated cdst of $89,600.00. Add Total Add Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD)(~oc~) Amended Contract Price ~oard authorization date: Approved: $ 89,600.00 $ ·s g , 6 o o • o o I $6.387,511.00 $ __ -_o_---- $ __ 8_9.J.., _6 o_o__,;._o_o_ $6 , 4 7 7 t 111. 0 0 COUIITY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California . , CAROLLO AND KEITH By ____ ~------~------------ /1.n-~nda Item /113 -J-1 By /s/ Paul G. Brow_n~~~~~ Chief Engir.eer KORDICK AND RADOS, A JOINT VENTURE By--------------~-------------------- All Districts P.O. lJ.:.:·Z ~~.:.~::·/ 1.C~:.~~ :·.:111~: /,'.:?.:·:·._ie; .. ' •' Fou.ntu i. n V.:.t 11 ej', c ci Ji fo ~T~i~ 92'703 CE.M;G:~ ORDf·~R ---·--------C. 0 ·• NO. 1 --·~------- co1n~R/~CTOR: :UK!~ r-iASAi\OVJCH COi~STRUCTlO~~ CU~:l'1\!-JY D!\TE:!i~:rch 8, 1972 Jon : Main -lJ ye r Inter cc pt or·, Re ::i ch o s . 2 S :· 2 6 , 2 7 ft 2 S , · Co 11 tr a c t Ifo • 1 -12 Amount of thls clrnng·e order (ADD) vD~~liJ.mrrt:) $ __ 1-',..._.o_-s_;..o..;:;.. • ..;;:_s __ g _ ,.,,. . In accordance with contract .provisions, the follm'ling changes in the contract and/or contract ;wrk are hereby authorlzed and as compensation therefor, the following_ndditions to or deductions from the contract price nre hereby approved. · Reference: Contractor's letter an<l invoice to the District dated February 11, 1972. ADD The Contractor was directed to const.ruct a manhole ·at the 8" house lateral.at Station 89+40. This lateral \·:as not shm·:n on the plans. It was broken when it was encou:ntcre<l. flooding the ditch 5 hours of dmm time. The cost of construction of the manhole itself will be included in contract item #11. The cost for the down time was Sl,050.59. Add Total Add O!iginal Contract Price Prev. Auth. Cha0ges This Change (ADD)(DEDUCT) Amerlded Cont~act Price ~ard authorization date: Approved: $ 1,050.59 · $ 1 , o_ s o • s 9 · $ -0- $ 1,050.59 $473,196.59 .March 8; 1972 COUNTY s~.;NITATION DISTRICTS of Orange Cou~ty, California .. -By ____ _._/_s~/~P_a_u_l~G_.~B_r_o_w_n~~~~~ Chief ·Engineer MIKE MASA..t~OVICH CONSTRUCTION cmIPANY A1i:enda Item #19 -K-District 1 \ RESOLUTION NO. 72-29 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTAI\fCE OF GRANT OF EASE.MENT (TEMPORARY) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOo 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF TEMPORARY GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM JANE Co AYERS * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain Grant of Easement (Temporary) from Jane C. Ayers, dated February 10, 1972, wherein temporary easement for use for construction of sanitary sewer is granted to County Sanitation District No. 1, acting as agent for itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, is hereby accepted; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said temporary easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said temporary easement is granted in connection with construction of Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8; and, Section 4. That said temporary easement is accepted at a cost of Two Hundred Dollars and no/100 Cents ($200.00); and that payment ·of said $200.00 to Jane Co Ayers from the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund is hereby authorized; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records.of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1972. Agenda Item /120 L-1 District 1 RESOLUTION NO. 72-39 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENrr (TEMPORARY) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF TEMPORARY GRANT OF EASEMENT DEEBLE INVESTMENT COMPANY * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain Grant of Easement (Temporary) from Deeble Investment Company, dated February 22, 1972, wherein temporar1 easement for use for construction of sanitary sewer is granted to County Sanitation District No. 1, acting as agent for itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, is hereby accepted; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said temporary easement is granted is more particulary de.scribed and .shown on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a. part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said temporary easement is granted in connection with construction of Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8; and, SectLon 4. That said temporary easement is accepted at a cost of Three Hundred Dollars and no/100 Cents ($300.00); and, that payment of said $300.00 to Deeble Investment Company from the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund is hereby authorized; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Record~ of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1972. Ae;enda Item #20 L-2 District 1 RESOLUTION NO. 72-40 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMEN1' TEMPORARY A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF TEMPORARY GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM DOROTHY CONSTANCE SMITH HEDPENS * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain Grant of Easement (Temporary) from Dorothy Constance Smith Reddens, dated February 22, 1972, wherein temporary easement for use for construction of sanitary sewer is granted to County Sanitation District No. 1, acting as agent for itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, is hereby accepted; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said temporary easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said temporary easement is granted in connection with construction of Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8; and, Section 4. That said temporary easement is accepted at a cost of Three Hundred Dollars and no/100 Cents ($300.00); and that payment of said $300.00 to Dorothy Constance Smith Reddens from the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund is hereby authorized; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of ' County Sanitation District No. 1, be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1972. Agenda Item #20 L-3 District 1 RESOLUTION NOo 72-30-5 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A QUITCLAIM DEED A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOo 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A QUITCLAIM DEED TO IRVINE COMPANY * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 5 has heretofor . acquired an easement from the Irvine Company in connection with construction of Coast Highway Trunk Sewer and Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-12; and, WHEREAS, it has been determined by the District's consulting engineer that a portion of said easement is no longer needed by District No. 5; NOW,1THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED: Section 1. That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, does hereby approve that certain Corporation Quitclaim Deed dated March 9, 1972, from County Sanitation District No. 5 to the Irvine Company, as submitted by the General Counsel, and recommended by the District's ~onsulting engineer; and, Section 2. That the real property to be quitclaimed is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That the Chairman of the. District be authorized and directed to execute a Corporation Quitclaim Deed, quitclaiming the District's interest in the certain real property therein described. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1972. Agenda Item #28 M-1 District 5 --·------~---- SHUIRMAN • SIMPSON :r J r 1 ·--.. CONSUL TINCl CIVIL ENGINEERS . . , . . Mr. C. Arthur Nissen, Jr. General Counsel County Sanitation District of Orange County 2014 North Broadway Santa Ana, California 92706 Dear Sir: February 2, 1972 Enclosed is a copy of a letter, legal description and sketch from Colin Relf of The Irvine Company regarding the quitclai~ of an easement across Upper Newport Bay. This easement was granted to the Dis- trict about five years ago for the Upper Newport Bay Force Main Crossing but ·was not used. In 1971, The Irvine Com?any granted the District a new easement which is now occupied by the force main that was recently completed. The portion of the old easement is no longer needed and I recommend that it be quit- claimed~ The legal description prepared by Mr. Relf has been checked and appears to be in order. DCS/lm Enc. cc: R.Lewis,San.Dist. C.Relf NEWPORT CENTER BUILOINO SS:J Son M1n~1£1I 01·•vfJ • · . r.. · 1 Very truly yours, SHUI1U1AN-SIMPSON -j/tJ Donald c. Simpson r J_ s t r ~~ c t ·- ·-. ...1.... ,J •• RESOLUTION NO. 72-31-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEI'TANC:C OF GE.ANT OF EASE1>LE:IVI1 FROM ROBERT & CYNTHIA . ALEXANDER A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOo 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASN•1ENT FROM ROBERT ALEXANDER AND CYNTHIA ALEXANDER .. * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DErrERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain Grant of Easement dated February 14, 1972, wherein an easement for sanitary sewer purposes is granted to--. County Sanitation District No. 7 , is hereby accepted from Robert f,lexander and Cynthia Alexander; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and 11 B 11 , attached hereto and ma.de a. part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said easement is granted in connection with providing sewer service for undeveloped parcels of land in A.D. #1; and, Section h. That said easement is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 , be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1972. Agenda Item #3g(a) -N-District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 72-32-7 AUTHORIZilIG ACCEPTr"1.NCE OF GHANT OF EASfa1lEUT FROM ROBERT & DORIS DEVLIN A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIREcrroRS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO o 7 OF ORANGE COUl'ITY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHOHIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM ROBERT F. DEVLIN AND DORIS R. DEVLIN . * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES BEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain Grant of Easement dated wherein an easement for sanitary sewer purposes is granted to County Sani ta ti on District No. 7, is hereby accepted from Robert F. Devlin and Doris R. Devlin; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shovm on Exhibits 11 A11 and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; c,,nd> Section 3. That said easement is granted in connection with prividing sewer service for subject property located in P. .• D. #2; and, Section 4. That said easement is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 5. Tlv:i.t the Secretary of -the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No~ 7 , be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED A11D ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1972. Agenda Item #39(b) -0-District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 72-33-7 AlJTHORIZIIm ACCEPTANCE OF GI"V\.NT OF EASEi 1iEIYr FROM RICHARD & JOANN ALKEMA A RESOLUTION OF THE BOAPJ) OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SA~~TATION DISTRICT NOo 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF.GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM RICH!\RD H. ALKEMA AND JOANN ALKEMA * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation Distric·t No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain Grant of Easement dated February 23, 1972, wherein an easement for sanitary sewer purposes is granted to I County Sanitation District No. 7 , is hereby accepted from Richard H. Alkema and JoAnn Alkema; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and ''B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said easement is granted in connection with providing sewer service for subject property located in A. D. #2; and, Section 4. That said easement is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of qounty Sanitation District No. 7 , be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California·. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held M·arch 8, 1972. Agenda Item #~9(c) -P-District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 72-34-7 AUTIIORIZII'TG ACCEPTANCE OF GHANT OF EASEMElfi1 FROM IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIHECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOo 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OP EASE'MENT E1ROM IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY'RESOLVE, DETERM:INE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain Grant of Easement dated January 11, 1972 wherein an easement for sanitary sewer purposes is granted to.-. County Sanitation District No. 7 , is hereby accepted from Irvine Industrial Complex; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and '1B", attached hereto and ma.de a part of this resolution_; and, Section 3. That said easement is granted in connection with sewer main ·in Al ton Avenue· between Jamboree and Von Karman ·Avenue; and, .. Section 4. That said easement is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 , be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1972. Agenda Item #3g(d) -Q-District 7 • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 of Ori.lngc County, CC! l i forn i a /\DDEtJDUM NO. l to COf~STRUCT I 01'.J° SPECIFICATIONS AND PLAt~S for KNOTT I tJTERCEPTOR A PORT I ON OF REACH 1 AND REACHES. 2 AND 3 CONTRACT NO. 3-17 GENERAL PROVISIOtJS L Section 5, Subsection ?-3, page 16, add the follrn·ting paragraph after the second paragraph: "For all boring, jacking pi ts or similar trenches or open excava- tions which are 5 feet or deeper, the Contractor shall obtain a permit from the applicable agency as ~equired by California Lcibor Code 61124.1 • 2. Section 5, Subsection 5-lp, page 19, add the following p~ragraph after the third-paragraph: "For all trenches 5 feet or more in depth, the Contractor shall p'rcpare and submit to the Engineer a detailed plan shrn·ling the design of shoring, bracing, sloping, or other provisions to be made for worker protection as required by California Labor Code 6422. 11 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 1. Section 21, Subsection 21-2.6, page 3, delete the first sentence of the second paragraph and substitute the following sentence: ''The Contractor shall have the option of furnishing one of t1t10 types of joints: (a) the lock joint, (b) a concrete bell and spigot type (either flush bell or flared bell) where a gasket shall be confined in a contained groove.11 DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS 1~· Section 137, add the fol lowing new section to the detailed specifications: Addendum ~~o. Page Agenda Item #43 R-1. · District 3 • ADDE.NOUM NO. 1 -Co11tinuecl SECTIOH 137 County Sanitation Dis~rict No. 3 Knott I r~tcrc:eptor Contr~ct No~ 3-17 STATE or CALIFORl~IA, DEPARTl\EtF OF PUBLIC \.!ORKS DIVISIOU OF HIGHHAYS COt~STRUCTIOtl REQU I REt·iEIHS FOR WORK UNDER THE SAN 0 I EGO FREE\·/AY EAST OF THE NE\./LAND STREET OVERCROSS I t~G 13 7 -1 GENE RA L the state has issued Encroachment Permit No. 772-E··7711808 for the crossing of the San Diego Frec~·1c:iy at the Ne\·Jland Street overcrossing for the installation and maintenance of the interceptor se\ver improvements.· A complete'copy of the state encroachment permit is included on the fol lowing pages and is hereby . made a part of these detailed specifications. · The D i s t r i c t as sum es no 1 i a b i 1 i t y as to the a cc u racy or s. u f f i c i en c y of -·-the information as furnished on the plans or in the permit. The Contractor is cautioned to check with the Division of •lighways to ascertain the appropriate prices and type of improvements at the time of bidding and no al lov1ance \·Ji 11 be m~de.by the District for compensation should these conditions change. 137-2 I HSPECT I ON COSTS The Contractor's attention i~ call~d to the requirem~nts on the second page of th~ special conditions of the c~croachment permit wherein the Contractor shall reimburse the state for all of their inspection costs for work 1td.thin state highway right-of-way. · 137-3 GROUTING SEWER CARRlER PIPE WITHIN TUNNEL Gr~uting of the annular space betwee~.the sewer carrier pipe and the tunnel 1iner plate shall be performed in 100-foot maximum length segments. The grout shall be placed under pressure by means of q slick line. The discharge end of the slick line shal 1 be rigid conduit and kept buried in at least 5 feet of fresh grout during placement. The slick line shal 1 be placed at the top of the carrier·pipe and grout pumped during 1tlithdrawal of the discharge end from the fresh grout to eliminate slick line vqids. ·137-4 PAYMENT •. It is the Contractor's responsibility to meet all requirements of the encroach- ment permit and requirements established herein and all costs incurr~d due to said requirements shall be considered to be included in the contract u~it or lump sum prices paid for the var'ious items of work and .no additional all0\·1ance wi 11 be made therefo~.· Agenda Item 1/43 .. . R-2 .. Addendum r:o. 1 page 2 District 3 • I ' . ADD END UM NO. PLANS -Continued County San i t<:1 ti on District ffo. 3 Knott I nte rcep tor Contract No: 3-17 J. Substitute revised Shect:No. 40 for original Sheet No. 40. The limits of the cXfsting concrete tr-ansit-ion str.lictlITT-\~/h-i"Ct1.must be removed and reconstructed has been revised. The sequence of remov~l and additional sections and details covering the reconstruction-have been added. Payment for the removal and recon- struction of the t~ansition structure shall be included in the contract unit price for which such work is appurtenant thereto and no additional al lowancc wi 11 be nwde therefor. The California Division of High\:1ays Dra\·Jings for the construction of the existing transition structure are on file at the District Heildquartcrs and may be examined by the bidders. Enclosed for use in bidding and construction is the revised Sheet No. Lio CH:ns 3-3-71 B-COJ-lOG-50 :. --. Agenda Item #43 Conrad Hohcner, Jr., C .. ·~. Addendum tJo. 1 Pase 3 Distrlct 3 RESOLUTION NOo 72-35-3 AUTHORIZING CONSENT TO CONVEYANCE OF PORTION OF DisrrRICT EASEMENT FROM: DEPARTMENT OF NAVY A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF-ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF A PORTION OF DISTRICT EASEMENT FROM U.So DEPARTMENT OF NAVY FOR SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD PUMP STATION FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 3 is the grantee of an easement from United States of America, Department of the Navy, dated November 16, 1971, and recorded as Document 9607, Book No. 9922, Page 183 in the Official Records of Orange County, upon which has been constructed the Seal Beach Boulevard Pump Station, Contract No. 3-12; and, WHEREAS, it appears in the best public interest that County Sanitation District No. 3 convey a portion of said easement for installation of an underground electrical distribution line by the Southern California Edison Company to serve said pump station; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED: Section 1. That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 hereby approves that certain Grant of Easement (NF-R-14051) dated February 1, 1972, between the United States of America, Department of the Navy, and the Southern California Edison Company; and, / Section 2. That said easement is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District be authorized to execute the Consent to Conveyance of said grant of easement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1972. Agenda Item #44 -S-District 3 HESOLUTION NO o 72-36-3 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH MIDWAY CI'I'Y SANITARY DISTRICT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOo 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH MIDWAY CITY SANITARY DISTRICT **7<•***** The Board of Directors of County Sanitation.District No. 3, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated ------------~----' wherein Midway City Sanitary District agrees to abandon sanitary I sewer in Newland Street in order to facilitate construction of Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1, Reach 2 and Reach 3, Contract No. 3-17, in consideration of District 3 1 s convenants to allow Sanitary District to connect to said interceptor and to provide sanitary facilities to service the area easterly of Newland Street between Oberlin and Palos Verdes Avenues in the event said service becomes necessary, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1972. Agenda Item #l+6 -T-District 3 • Board of Directors CIVIC CENTEH 8200 WESTMINSTG~ r\VF-NUE WESTMlt~STER, CALli-ORNIA 92683 71 t; CODE 8~3-t.511 ~ebruary 29, 1972 Orange County Sanitation District #3" P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: I The City of Westminster respectfully requests your consideration for a joint construction project involving your sewer facilities and the City's storm drain facilities on Bolsa Avenue between Magnolia and Newland. The present need for facilities by both agencies in approximately the same location would indicate there may be co~siderable savings to be re- alized in engineering, construction, and inspection, if the facilities are installed simultaneously under one contract. The staff of the City of Westminster believes that this joint project could effectively be handled with the County Sanitation Distrlct as the administrating agency. If this proposal is acceptable, we will recommend to our City Council they enter into an agreement with the Sanitation District to pay their proportionate share of the project. We believe this project can provide substantial savings to both agencies, and request your favorable consideration of this proposal. Sincerely yours, CITY OF WESTMINSTER . /_ ,~--~? ~/ // .. •;. /'' / /~.: .. /·-~): x~--,,.£; __.. •. ,_, ·---., .. --. . //' ~ W. L. Cavanagh , WLC:gef Ass is tan t C i t y Ao mi n i st rat or· Agenda Item 47(a) -U-District 3 RESOLUTION NOo 72-37-3 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF "WESTMINSTER FOR JOINT CONSTRUCTION OF SEWER AND STORM DRAIN FACILITIES A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER TO JOINTLY CONSTRUCT THE SANITATION DISTRICT'S BOLSA RELIEF TRUNK SEWER AND THE CITY'S STORM DRAIN FACILITIES IN BOLSA AVENUE * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the City of Westminster has requested that.County Sanitation District No. 3 enter into an agreement for the joint construction of sewer and storm drain facilities in Bolsa Avenue between Magnolia and Newland; and, WHEREAS, it appears that substantial cost savings can be I realized by the joint construction of proposed sewer facilities of County Sanitation District No. 3 and proposed storm drain facilities of the City of Westminster; and, WHEREAS, the City has offered to reimburse County Sanitation District No. 3 for the City's proportionate share of all costs of the joint construction project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND-ORDERED: Section 1. That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 does hereby approve that certain agreement dated ---------, between County Sanitation District No. 3 and the City of Westminster, to jointly construct the District's proposed Bolsa Relief Trunk Sewer and the City's proposed storm drain facilities in Bolsa Avenue between Magnolia and Newland; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 3 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreemento PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1972. Agenda Item 47(b) -V-District 3 • M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: J. Wayne Sylvester FROM: Ray E. Lewis Cour~TY SANITATION D1srR1crs of ORl\r~GE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 l 0844 ELLIS AVEl~UE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALlrORNIA 92703 (714) S.t!0-2910 (714) 962-2411 February 22, 1972 SUBJECT: Su11plemental Soils Investigation Report for the Knott Interceptor Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-17 In Dcccmbcrt 1971, the State Division of Higlrnays recommended an alignment for the future Huntington Beach Freeway at the intersection of the San Diego Freeway 11hich 'rnuld result. in an approximate 40 feat additional cover over the District's Knott Interceptor Seller. It was the opinion of Boyle J3nginccring and myself that additional soils investigation was warranted to determine the effects of this i11crcased surcharge to the trunk sewer facility.. It was the mutual recommendation th<it the increase in the soils investigation fee to Convei'sc, D~vis and Associates be increased from $6500 to $8500 for subsequent soils investi- gation regarding the proposed freeway fills. During the latter part of December and January~ Converse, Davis and Associates was called upon on several occassions to not only substan- tiate their field investigations but to make a lengthy analysis of the designs of the future freeway construction. Based upon their investi- gation and consultation with the State Division of Highways, the State has recommendc.d an alignment change and structural modifications which will not place an additional surcharge on the Knott Interceptor. The soils investigation firm of Converse, Davis and Associates has submitted an invoice in the amount of $3556 for the supplemental work required for this freeway crossing. It is my opinion that, because of the instruction of the consulting engineer and myself, the consultant did sustain additional charges and the scope for the additional work as approved was extended. I hereby recommend approval of this invoice and recommend that it be submitted to the Board of Sanitation District No. 3 for their consideration. /lm l\genda Item #48 -W-District 3 -Ji ·. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELL.:15A:VENUE1,( EUCLID._DFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGQ FREEWAY) .. · ... March 3, 1972 M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: C. ATI'I'HUR ITISSOi'I, GENERAL COUT!SEL FROM: FRED A. HARPER, GEHEPJ\.L 1·11\.I\.l\GER RE: STAFF QUESTI ems on PROPOSI:D co:.:SOLIDATIOI! AGr.:~EMEIIT SlJDlH'l1J 1 ~D ':;Y 'I1lIT1 : S11 f-:.?r 0~1' '.arn CITY OF sz.:\L B~~-:~cH TO co!;soL1:c . .:._72: Eif3~i.?ICT =~o. 1l T,·!IT:-I DIS7?ICT 1·10. 3 I (1) Is it proper for the Consolidation Agree~ent to be entered :Lnto by the four publ:Lc cnt:i ties rw..rnec1 :j_D the agrcernent? (2) Can a consolj_dation of b·ro D:Lstricts be concluded when the effective dute of co~solidation is to be July l, 197h? (3) Is it proper· to expect the consolidation fee to be paid by an agency other than Sani tat:Lo~1 Distr:i..ct Ho. 4? (l~) Several Directors of District No. 3 have expressed concern over the possible inability of our District to collect sufficient tax monies within the area of the proposed consolidation because of the activities of the Redevelop~ent Agency of the City of Seal Beach. Could you research this matter and be prepared to advise the Directors as to the legal ramifications? (5) During our earlier discussions with the staff of the City of Seal Beach it \·ms our understanding th:~ t District No. 4 would not have any l~abilitics, Included in the pro- posed Consolidation Agreement~ Paragraph C, they propose that District Ho. 3 \·1ould assume all liabilities of D:lst:rict No. 4 on July 1, 1974. This does not appear to be prudent in our staff's opinion. Please advise. cc: Mr. Dennis Courtcmarche, City ~!gr. City of Seal Beach Agenda Item #49 X-1 District 3 ·----·:----~~ ---.... -~..:k ___ :.._:.~. J---·~ ...... _ ... _. _:;.... ... ·.·------·--·- March 2, 1972 . TO: FROM: Fred Harper, General tfonager, Joint S~rnitation Distrkts Dennis Courtemarch2, City Manager, City of Sea~ Beach SUBJECT: Factors Related to the Proposed Consolidation of Orange County ~ani ta ti on Districts fb:-.h~rs Three and Four. The follm·1ing is a brief descrirtion of Sanitation District f.lumber Four, the Redevelopment Agency v1hich is in existence \·lithin District number Four, and present plans to eliminate the District thfough its consolidation with Orange County Sanitation District number Three. PHYSICAL LIMITS -ASSESSED VALUE -AtlO FL0!1! CHARACTERISTICS OF DISTRICT #4 Presently, the total jurisdictional area of Sanitation District #4 is 2~844.7 acres. This includes 625.7 acres of land mass· (all that area lying north of the mean high tide line) and 2,219 acres off shore. The mean high tide line is recognized as the separation point bet~1een State tidelands and the area subject to local control such as city and county. Orange County Sanitation* Districts' total gross assessed value is reported as being $27,050,656 with $6,851,760 of this lying off shore. Average daily flm·1s during the oast year at the existing plant were as follows: January 1971 February March April May June July August September October November December January 1972 AVERAGE 1,087 ,526 L034,395 1,056,907 1,065,585 1,069,741 1,078,330 1,180,999 1,343,741 1,354,552 1,107,333 1,123,818 1,144,752 1,167,200 1,139,607 * This is in reference to Sanitation District No. 4 only. n.genda Item /!49 X-2 District 3 • Mr. Fred Harper March 2 '>. 1972 Pa_g_e T\~9 __ .· There has been no significant increase in average daily flow over the past several years. Since there is very little area in the District available for development, future t\VD should not chw1ge apprecia.bly. REDEVELOPMEiH AGEMCY The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Seal Beach \'las formed on Febl·uary 20, · 1967 ur.der authori t.y of the Corcmuni ty Redeve 1 opment Law of the State of California. The reason for establishing the Redevelorment Agency was to provide a rnelhod of fi nand ng of spcci fi c pub 1 i c improvements. Th2 "Report to City Council for the Riverfront Redevelopment Plan" elated January 31, 1969, 1isted the improvem~nts as (1) Sewer Treatment Plant, (2) Electric Avenue Improvements, (3) Marina Park and Cor.~:nunity Facility and (4) _First Street Extension. Item (3) is complete. Item (4) has become a city financed project. Item (1) is dependent on an acceptable agreement of consolidation and successful clean \·tater grant application. Once the aforementioned public improvements have been accomplished and all Agency debts have been repaid, the need for the Agency should no longer exist. The Redcvelop~ent Agency project area consists of 104 acres, 54'of which arc either in public use or are slated for public use. 36 acres within the project area have been developed by the private sector with 14 acres remaining to be similarly developed. · An important point with reference to the Redevelopment Agency's impact on other taxing jurisdictions is that the basic purpose of the Agency is to take low value land and convert it to high value land. To quote Eugene Jacobs, one of the foremost authorities on Redevelopment Agency La\'J in the State and \'/ho is presently on retainer to more than twenty such agencies, 11 The best thing that can happen to the school districts ..• and to the county •.• would be to have the areas which are blighted ... the areas which are not producing taxes, and have those areas start producing taxes ••. and therefore increase the areas around them." DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION -------- It is proposed to cons~idate the District #4 sewage collection system with District #3 by constructing a waste water interceptor originating at the existing Seal Beach se~1age treatment facility and terminating at the District #3 pump station at Westminster Avenue and Seal Beach Boulevard. ~genda Item #49 X-3 District 3 .. Mr. Fred Harper March 2 , 1972 Page Three --------- The project provides for ~bandonment und clo.rnolition of District fl4's treat~ ment plant discharging into .the San Gabr·iel Flood Control Channel. It would thereby elirrrlnate an existing wa.ste discharge and promote rcg'ion- wide coordination of se\Hge c:isposal. The project plans and specifications have been approved and certifi0d by the State Division of Hater Quality Control. A grant av1ard vril 1 b~ p1'eSei1.ted to the City of Seal Geach and Sanite.tion District #4 in the near future a~ a result of letters of intention ·to consolidate fro!ll Sanitvtion Districts Numbers Three and Four to Environ- menta 1 Protection Agency. Hov:ever, no funds \·Ii 11 be disbursed unt i 1 the Environmental Protect-ion Agency has received a copy of the approved consolidation agreement. SUMMARIZED COUSOLIDATION AGREEi·iEfff At meetings of tile Seal Beach City Council, Sanitation District #4, and ·Redevelopment Agency of Seal Geach held on FebPuary 28, 1972, an agreement consolidating Sanitation Districts numbers Three and Four was unanimously approved by the three participating parties. It is being forwarded to Sanitation District #3 for their consideration. The salient features of the agreement are as follows: 1. Consolidation is effective on July 1, 1974. 2. The consolidation fee is based on District #3 1 s Resolution 72-6-3; namely, $630 per acre applied to a land mass or service area of 625.7 acres. 3. District #4 will pay District #3 an amount equal to six per cent (6%) per annum of the consolidation fee from the date of recordat 'ion \·:ith the Secretary of State to the effective date of consolidation, July 1, 1974. 1. dir ~ 1· I -/,' __ , l.tu.·<-<-l ~e.....:u ~c<.r:.Q,( ( r\.__(___ bennis Courtemarche DC:mjs Agenda Item #49 X-4 \ District 3 '• CONSOL IDNi' JON l\GH.EE:r·ff:l'~I1 ----------------...... ·------..----------· THIS COJ~SOLID!~'J~1 lON day of AGlrnEl'·iE:!-tl' is rnacJ.o , 197~, by and ancl. cnt.c!recl. into t.h i~-? c:mong and and ana 1. I Sl\NITA'I'ION DIS'TPICri'"' NlJI.'.iGEl~ FOUR OF OHl\NGE COUN'I'Y, hereinafter rc:ferrcd • ·""() .• ,C~ 11 ])j c•~-r·]_, c·'· '1\~l1 "'1)1':>)-};"'QUI II -:L. c. .. LJ • • • ..., l. - -L. J • u ll. "-:-. -. -- Sl\NI1'l'/L' JON IHSr.i:JUC1.l.' F!UJ:,'lDEE 'I'E~r~E OF qH.7\1.~GE COUi:·:l'Y,. herci.ni.1.fter refe:::rJ:ed to ·:i_c '!Di c· L ric 1 • Fu:··~)-~·-·· 'l'hrc-e 11 • . <.. ,,, , • _._, •••• • L .• -~ •• 11>. ~--'-••• ' • t • ·rnm c J.:TY OF SEl~L BI~J\CJI, Cl\l:IF01'..N Ii\, C.l •1 -, ~.t. ·~· 7 }-~--..,! ~·f'-.· t"">.r;C ·-· ,.-, ~-o c 1,.-,1. LCY. c 1. L 1 , 1 ...... J. c .1.n..:-. l.er r .... J_ ... ~J. reu l.- _a s "City 11 : 'l1I1E Hl~DJ.::\7ELOP1:·:t:1·:;T li.GE~~CY OF ~CHE CITY . OP SEi\L L1~!\CH, hcrcir'1~ft.er J:c~f:crrr~D to c:ts "As ency. 11 : . · nr~c rn~Ls --·---~----------- \·.mt:n.E/:.S, District-. Kum1x~r Four h2f1 c:r·:a~es~;cd itf; wj_llincrness to consolicl.atc wit.h ni·fJt:c ict Nn::iber 'J.'h:;.-c0 a~~ C:-{prc:~f-~c~c1-5.n Rc~;olut).011 72--l (E>~h.ihi t l\), ancl. 2. h1 IJErn~:?~S, Distr:ict Nurt11-JC:r 'J1 h1~cc has cxr>rcsf:~xJ it~~ \·.75.lJ i11gn2ss ·t.o consc1lid2.t.e \·.~ith District N:·;_:111x~r Four u~:; cxp~cc:.::s€'c"1. in its una1dJ1lOUS intent. CJ.t. its rnoeting of r21~1.LUC:~j:y 9, l 97~~ I ( t.• , • } • .• B I -· :i .1.'.·Xf1J. )J.L. I I c:.DCt 3. \·mmums, city \·d.shes to insure the c1evc!lop:11::-:nt. within tbc! city of a se•17aye system rnoetinCJ the highc~~t tcchnoJogical st~nc1c::rds and alr;0 t.o conform to -Che adopted Interim Basin PJ.an of the Culifcn:nia I~c~sionc-Ll Wate1.~ Quality Co:1trcl J30c'.~:-d, Santc.. !\na Reg ion, C"lnc1 4. WflERBhS, Ag2ncy '[l'lishr;s to hnp2'.-ovs lhc q:_12J.:i.ty c:ncJ. c2p::c.~ty o:!: scwuge trca.tn2nt c:rnd dL~posul wit.hin t1H.~ project are{...,_ of: said 1\ge.ncy throuc_(b the consolic1at.ion of District Nn1Tiher rl'hre2 2nd DiEtrict Uurnb2r Four, and 5. WIIEI1El~S, In c:.ccorclancc \'lith GovE~rnrncnt Code Section 56000, e:t . seq., Districts 'I'hr!2c nnd Fo'..lr hc}~ehy a.g:i:·ee to consolidate~ c.s set. forth herein. The J2cff~~es .t? this consolidt"lt:i.on 5g:ceern~E(: l~S~.~~~1~~ J2T-On:i_?_S: and .9_9-r c e .9 s f o 11 rn·::_:; : A. The n;:~~12 of the consolidated clj.sJccL.cc shall b2 11 Snni tc-d:ion District Nu.m1x~r Th:;.:-c2 of Orc:1ngc County. " B. 'l'hc se-.-r~1:a.0e systcn of: District· i:-_~-.-.:~),:,:J: Four sha1l }:>e consolidc<tecl. i,1.7ith D.i.~1t.rict Nt.m~b.:.:;r r~~hrcc 2:t nci c-:·:ps!ls2 to Di st;:· ict N1..lr:~l::--e:1.-Th re.L';. Agenda Item 7149 X-5 District 3 •, , C. Up~m tf1c c £feet j_\,1c date of this con sol id~l tio~, all of the:· assets includi ncj b'..1t not lirr1itcc1 to property ta:-~'cs rcc'c i vc-1b.le f1~0Jt1 the equaU. z~ t:3.on ·of o}:ange Coui;ty A;,~~;essor Is rr~l:·: Eull cd1d -the Stat.:"e Board of ·j~~qtl2J.~.~za~i~)i.1:?'ax R?l~. cf~ectivc J'.~~-1.rch 1, 197'1, nnd alJ J.1.uh:t.l.1t10s of DJ.f:t:i·ict l~t11~1l)2r Foui..-f_;h2.ll be- corn:·:~ the assets ci.nd l i<1bi liti.es of i.:hc consolicfa.tcc1 ' d:i.r;U:-:i.ct, and said ce>n~;c>Li.cbted d:i.~;tr. ict f:iholl Cl s C·\·1·.-r, .:.., -~ i ·L 0 f· 1'· 11 r •. c·o11·t--".\ c··'· t' 1=-·1 0"'1)11· (' _lJ_ J.' 01·1 C' 0 Ir: •. C. ~-•) .• : I'-( l • . • '-• • J. ~ '· • l. . " .. :J L l-. •-' . Di~d.~rict Nnmlx~r Four includi11g but not· lirn.itcd to those:~ V.:r::i.~_;ing froin or incm.:-r·cd by virtue of the 'Join-L J'~):c~rcisc of PCYVlC~):S hgr·cc;·l1cnt. b0b·:ecn C:i.t.y and. District Nurnbei· Foru~ crc~at ing t:h0 Seal Beach Ac1min istre:~t.ion B\.1 ilding l''luthc,r ity. D. 'J.'bc c~ffccLLv(~ dr).t.c of consolidc:tLlon shall b2 July l, 1974. r.•,. 'J'}•·t'· ·11) t'1l1t:·~··r•l11nl)!'..'l-E··C"' r,.1,·10"':.... }·nc)t1r'i1·1rr c·--,c·l1 ~r.a J..: J C L C . . • .. '-• l ..... .• . .._.. . • l J_ '-. ~ •• ·' / • • .. . • '-J.... • '-_, C. .::.>. n l . rccciv.ublcs o::: Dif:l.rid~ nmn1:::.7!r Fot1i: slw.ll be trans- ferred to 2nd b2cei::1~~: the prop2}_· l:.y of District. Nurnb2r T11i-e2 ·c:r!.d shc.11 l rcdu~:e l.hc consoJ icl.aL:ion fee as rcci-tc~1._ heroin by cln . amor:nt cc_iu<.:l tcJ thc1t of f;cd.d uncncurnl:<TecJ f1;nd:.3, .cd.~.~L, <-;_n(1 recoivablcf; exist i119 a::; of :June 3 0, 19.h. F. 'I1h;:tt. Di[:'.trict NuJ~11x~r Fc.>Fr f:~holl p~.y Di~-d.:rict Nu,·nl)2r 'I'hrec-~ all -operatin9 co~~t.ro incun:L!d by ~j strict. NumlK:r 'l'hree in t:rE:0.t ing· and cl.isp0;:.1 ins of \"1 ~s t:c \'later fro::u District l~th1b~r Four prior to July 1, 197/i· ~ such disp8sal cc 1 ~;ls m.:G b21:cby ~~tipulatecl. and f ixcc1 at $30 pe:~r rnillion ~;al lons of \'.1 l.lste water. G. 'I'hat Di.strict. Number Four shc:.J.1 p~y District Number. Three ~n amount. equal to six pc~j_-cc~nt (G%) per annum of the conf;ol :i.dat ion f cc fr.om the date of recordation with the Secretary of State to the ef f:cctive date of con sol id~~tion, July 1, 1974. II.. Thc:tt Dis-t:rict Nurnbcr Three-: shall assume Gll costs of trcat1110nt of waste water from Dif;t:i.~:i.ct Nt.i.mber Foul:" ·from and after the effective date of consolidatinn. I. The City is to terminate the lc2.~;c of ce1:tain city hall facilities by' District l·'!l1L;bc:-c: Four reciting an annual rent of $ 2 , 5 0 0 u i_) ::m th c~ (-! ff e: c t iv e date of con~;olid::d:ion; ancl to hold District Number Three harmless from any U.2.bility resulting frcim the assurr.ption of the obli~Jcltions of District KuDbe1: Four as to the Joir.t Exe re i~_;c of Po~,:::~i.-f; l\gre0r.H::nt. Agenda Item #49 X-6 District 3 • J. Pz1.ge '.£hl:ce '111-iu:l th~~ .f~cv1e:1.~;c faci lit 5.e ~.; ncces sz!ry to intcgr ute l.hc syst.em~: of rx:.st.rict Numhcrs 'J.'h::~·cc and Four shi1lJ b::::~ ~onst~·uctcd and p2 ... id for from .fund~; . of District Rl.i.mbcr Four and the fun:l ~; p1:ov i0.2d in Fec10~r a 1 Grant Nmnbc:r C-OG-: 063 2 ( f Dn:,12r ly WPC-··Cal--63 ?-) • K~ 'l'hc l\90ncy ~i~]:cce::; -Lo pc;:y Lo the· Con~_;oJ..:i.dat.ed Dictrict-_ the con;:;olic1ation fee.~ in the sum of $394, J 90., pc::y- · able in five, cqut1.J., annual pclymcnts of $78,B38., b . ·• .. ] l '19'71!" ~9\lFLu·1g lJu .. y . , l-. J~ • 'J 1 h c r :i. 0 ht s , d n t i c ~; , and ob l i. g l"! t ion f; of e a ch o f · t. h c; · 'pnrLi.e~~ "to this ugrecm2nt al:e conc1itioncc1 upon the · Cit.i of SeC1l Be~-:ch· rccciv ins-Fecl.ej:c;.1 Grant l'-~t.m:b2r ·c-OG--06:::2 (forrnei.-ly V~Pc--cal--632) in an 0.r:1ount suff:icicmt to provide Di~_-;tci.cl Nuinbc~r Four \d.th u.pprrn-::i.r;:atc:ly eighty p(:~r cent (80%) of the eligible ·costs e:;s set fo"1-·Lh in' l.hc ~~pplic;Jtj on CJ.nd ot1v.~r ' grant. documents, and ctrc~ to be of no fu:cthcr force or effect 'in tr1c event L~nch grc..1.nt .is not received. to be an u!~i<J:;_nul: st-une agrecmc-!n:..:.. sha1) p::rt s; each is hereby c1ccl2l::ccd cons ti tu-t·.e but one Elnd Uw Il~ \VI'J.'NESS \·:m~Rr:OF, the pcirties h(~n=t.o have! aff:i:-~ed their hcinDs e:;.nd seeiJ.f_; w-H:.h u.11 tho fonno.litics required by la~.-.'. CJ'I'Y OF SE!~L BEl~CH By __ _ Mayor -----------~-- APPROVED l\S ri'O FORM:: ------~-----~-City Attorney 'l"'HE REDE\7 ELOPi·iEt-Tl1 AGEl~CY OF 'I'HE CI1'Y m;i SE!',L BE/' .. CH By __ _ Cha.irrnvn l'genda Item 1/49 X-7 Sl\NrI'h'I'ION" D1sr.rRIC'l1 1\:m.mEr~ FOUH OF ORM,YGE COUN1'Y General Manager SAN J'J.1A'J.' ION DI S'.l'JlI CT NUMB EB. THRCE OF ORi·iN.GE COUNTY District 3 • J~ESOLUT ro~\! NLJ1.rnrm £X£J':/ ]\ HESOLUTION ·OF THE CI'l'Y COUNCIL· OF 'fin_; crrY OF SLhL BEl\CH, Cl\LIFOIUUi\, A CIJ7\H.TEH CI'l'Y I APPH.OV ING 'J'}IE ~OJ\TSOL ID.l\T IOi~ OF Sl\Nl'l'l\'J' ION DISTRJC.'l' NUViBim FOlW \'JITil Sl\I·n'J'J)TION DISTRICT NUMB EH THREE CW OH!\NGE COUlYl'Y ~ l\PPROV ING 'rIJE 'J.'E:RIUNNJ'ION OF A: JOINT EXERCISE. OF prn-nm.s AGH.EEI'·~EN'l' BE11\·J EEN THE c rrY OF SE:?\L BEl\CH AND SAN I'rNT IOl·J DISTPICT NUMlJER FOUH OF' Ol~l\l\TGE COUNr.J.'Y ~ AND l\ll'l1HOHI~Ir~G 'I'HE EXECUTlOl~ OF l\N AGH8f;I .. 1ENJ1 FOH CONSOL IDl\'J' ION. WHERims, 'J_'hc ci-Ly council of the City of Seal Deach, by Eesolution Nurnh2r 1467, dated the 18th day of ~July, 1966, requested the Board of Supervisors of Orange County to form Sanitation District Nmnb2r Four to provide SE!V.7a90 t.rcatrn2nt fa.cilitic~; for the sout:-icl~ly sec- tion of the city known as the "Hill" and 11 0cean 11 areas; and W!JBREAS, The Board of Supervisors by Resolut5on dated September 7, 1966, 'formed Sani tat.ion Dif5tr ic L-. Number Four of Orange county; and WHEREAS, By H.csolution Number 1658, dated April 15, 1968, the City of Seal Beach c:ipprov~d a Joint Exercise: of Po-;.·:crs Agrcem-::~nt \·1ith Sanitation District Number Four crea.tins the Seal Bev.ch BuilcHng Authority w·hich empCJWE!rccJ. the city and Sanitation District Nrn~1bc:r 1',our to acquire, construct, rnaj nto.in, and operate a building to provide-offices and facilities for the admini.strClt.ion of their respective functions in .Providing service~; to the pub~.ic; and WHEREAS, Sanitation District Number Four, by Resolution Number 68-3, dated May 6, 1968, approved a Joint Exercise of Powers Agree- ment which provided for payment by District to City a sum of · $2,500 per year as the District's share of the year~to-yeQr costs of maintenance and operation of said building: and WHEREAS, Sanitc-.. tion District Number Four now proposes to consoli- date w.:i.th Sanitation District Nurnbcr Three of Orange County, and subsequent to July l, 1974, will not require the facilities provided in accordance with the Joint Exercise of Pov.re rs Agreement: and WHEREAS, The City Council recognizes the neces~ity and the advan- tages of the consol~dation of District Number Four with District Number Thr~e, and hereby .approves the consolidation. NOW, THEREFORE, the city Council of .the city of Seal Beach hereby resolves and agrees as follows: 1. To terminate the lease of certain building facilities by District Number Four at an annual rent of $2, 500 upon ·the effective date of consolidation. 2. To u.ssulTt2 annual bond pay1:~cnt of $2, SOO resulting from Joint Exercise of PO\·.'crs 7'.greeraent. 3. To hold District Number Three h~lrmles~; from any liability resulti.ng fro;~1 the assumption of the o~)lig2tion of District Nrn:1bcr I·'our a~; to the J-oj nt · E;·:cJ:cisc of Pm .. ~C'.)~S h9rccrncnt. Agenda Item #49 X-8 Dis~rict 3 'l 4. rrhe 1·1~1yo:c and the City Manager arc authorized to execute f;aid agreement on behalf of the City of S0al B~och. PASSED, APPROVED, l\ND ADOPTED by the City Council pf tbc City of .. Sea] Beuch at a meeting thereof held on the ,_-),J_j/. d?y of ~-/i;; $1.1.-3..:.:..!.:_L-• _ , 1972, by the following_/ptc: J .• . . J .·], . . I())·. . . j A):_ / . l : ./' .. •'# /( '--!-/ AYES: Counc L_rncn_,::.:_:; : .. ·. -~ ...... ~,~~o_J.1,1'.' !.~L.:l...1:_!_:_);:.._t_(.7. / /!.:..:~!__t-:=.?.E_~-Z.J.2.:L.LI /,.,! , , . / / ' . NOES: Coun,cilEte_n , --}/ ")_1 1 J ABSBNT: . /I,: I \·,--_/_7· / i r-·~· '/ .. • .,/ .• ·/-· ~-./ .1 ;' , I \ \ ' ... ;; . /.( I -~---· l ... --. Mayoi:~-..--,----·------- , Agenda Item #49 X-9 District 3 RESOLU'l'ION .tJm:anm 72-1 -------------_____ ... _ -- A RESOLU'J: IOH OF' 'l'lm TIEDEVELOPViENT AGENCY OF THE CITY or SEAL BE!\CH, CALIFOH.NIA, APPHOV- ING 'ITJE COI~SOL lDA'I' ION OF Sl)Nri'j\1' ION DJSTH.IC1' NUMB.ER FOUH WITH Sh.NlTNl,lON DISrrl\..1_Crl' NUI'-rnEH THR8B 0.F OHJ\NGE COUN'lY ~ llGREEii'm 'l'O Mt\KE CERrrAIN Pl\Y.MEN'I'S 'l'Oh'l\IW THE COS'l' OF COHSOLI- DNi"'ION; l'~ND l'.UTf-JQRIZING AND DIH.ECTING THE CBAIHMJ~N AND 'J.'I:IE EXI.::CUTIVE DIRE:CTOH--~SECRE'l'ARY OF 'l'IlE H.EDEVELOPJliEN'l' AGENCY 'J'O EXECUTE AN AGREBMENT FOR SAID CONSOLiDATION. WHEREAS, The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Seal Beach was formed by Ot·c1inetnce Nuinber 7 08 of the City of ·Sp al Be etch on February 20, 1967, pursuant to Section 33101 of the Comrnu~1ity' Redevelopment. Law; and WHEH.Ims, The entire nrea which cornpri.sc~s the RedcvelcJprncnt Pro- ject arcil is located within Sanitation Dislricl Nw~Jer Four of Orange County; and WHEHEl\S, Sanitation District Nurnbej: Four of Orange County provides sewage treatment facili.ties for the p~oject area; and WBim.EAS, Sanitation Di.strict Number Four propof_;es to consolidate with Sanitation District Number 'l'hn:_'e of Orange County; and WHEREAS, rrhe Rcc1cvelopment Agency of the City of Seal Beach recognizes the advantages of such consolidation; f I NOW, THEREFORE, the· Rcclevelopmcnt. Agency of the City of Sec-tl Bec:ich approve·s the consolidation of Sanitation District: Number Fou·r with Sanitation District. Number Three o£Drange County and agrees as follows:. To .pay to tbc Consolidu.ted _District the sum of ·~'1':[ / qQ_ payable 1n five equal, annual payments of ~ 1 ¥ t ~ & each, beginning July 1, 1974. ' BE I'"l.1 FUI~'l'HEI~ RESOLVED that the Chairman and the Executive Director- Secretc:iry of the Redevelopment Agency of the·city of Seal Beach are hereby authorized and directed to execute an agreement for said consolidation. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOP'I'ED by the Redevelopment Agency1 of the· ci.tYi.lJ. of· Seal Beach at a meeting thereof held on the -~ l rr: day of 4 1+.l· , 1972, by the,.followin_g v,ote: . t.L , ·1 ·c, (' I . °' . l-~ ,· . Ii . . . . ·1;. . /i !) . ~) .. -·,.,.· --~ { _,· . ·_ . ·1 · A.·" 1 I~.· r-:-~>·,, . . AY~S: Memb~rsVii i.1 Ll~.1.'_)i '0~Jl,,._l, h--,'--{;t_1.~7.._.: -1) .· ~, .--~~-- --, 11 . .. .. . . . . . . ... NOES: Members '/ t..,.~~L- __,---=-~-~~~~·~~---~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ' ABSENT: ~ -...._.-..~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Chairman ·---Executi vc Director Secretary .. Agenda Item f--:49 X-10 District 3 : . A. m...:SOLlJ,1'101~ OF' rrm~ BO.l\IW OF DIH.J.:;crrORS. OF SANi--. 'l'NI1 JON JH~:'J.'lUCr_i' NUJ-:BEP. FOlJg OH OIUiNGE COUN;ry AUTHOi~ IZ ING r_f'} IE CONSOL lDld 10l,:: 01' f;l\N I'l'A'l' JOH DIS~i'iUC.l' Nlfi-1BER ·'Fb_UR \·a.TH Sl\Vi.:r:'.1'Nf':i OJ·~ DJS 11T~ICrJ.l NUMDEn 'l'f1Ri·;E; l~UTI-IOHl/':Hff:~ 1.l'HE C:I-mH~Vi..t"\N AKD rrHE .1·11\N.!\GE!~ OF ~~A1"JI'J'A.1l'IOH DIST'HIC'l' lnH-~UEJ.·~ FODE r1·0 ~r.AIT1·· · AJ'-)"" ·re' 7\ 'l' -L·o· 1 111 0 1J'}_}_' I 0°r· ] l c· ·•1 r'"v }.,01). ,.,\,..n ro--l'J \, ', - -J.·l.1 ... /,. -l'\ -l __ ., I -.....i. .I ~.-1'..!_\..._.J_ ~ J:\.l'•U .l .!..': COMiU:ss10N OF Olll~l~1GE COUNTY i hND l\lJTHOHIZII\G • ' ' I ' • ~ -• THE CJF~ JLL7~l\ h.HD rl'HE M2\I~ACE}~ OF nu-;~:n:ccr:e FOUR TO EXl~CUTI~ i\N l\.CEEEivlEN'J1 \·JrdJ SANJTNJ.1ION DISrl.T:.ICT NUMBEH ~i.'J}l<EE° FOH ~o:t-moI.1TDJ'l/I1IOFf OF 1HSTRIC11 S - Tlm.EE l:cND FOUR. -·-----· ---·--. ·---·--··-.. WHlmEJ\S I S 0 ?tnit,at 5 on Dist.r ?-cl Nnmb::-;r }~our of Or,:tng·e County \·.'~!S form2d Sep"C.<:!!nh:::r Ci, 1966,. und.:~r c-rnt~~xr.-:i.ty of Sc~cti9n 3700 et __ .scq of the IlCcillh ancl Safety Cods of the Si:.c1tc of Califorrd_ci; and WHElrnAS, 'J.'he J3~.:i~n:c1 o;[. DLccctor;3 of S:-nitc·1.t:i.on Dis·Lrict. Humber Four of Orc~.!i~c~ County has cl2t.cnnined th2t it L:; in the best interest of the Di st r j_ ct t. o re q UC:! st con~; o 1 id u t i. o o of s a i cl. District with San i tt::t ion Dis Lr ic·L:. rmrnbcr .rrhn:~c of Ort"mgc county; and WII~~H.Bl'~~;, suc"l1 con;.~ol lcfo·U_on is in accon1ancc v.'i th __ Section 5626. l of the Covernmc:nt Code of the Stc1tc of Ca1 ifo:·:nia; 2nd WI-lEl:~E!~S, San it.at.ion D:i.st.r ict. t\'U.Itt1J2r •:ehre:e, by HcsoluLion 72-G--3, -pusscd on the l/.th doy of cranuary, 19'/2, estctbJ.ishec1 p0lic5.e;3 and procec1urcf_; in connect.ion \·.:ith consolidat5.on of Dist1.-ict Number Four with District Number rrhrec ~ und WHEREhS, District Nurnber Four finds thC! policies and procedures c-1s set out in Sanitation District Nuir,1)2r Three's Resolution Nu:rnber 7/.-6--3 to b2 acccpt.c~ble, the Do0.rd of Directo:~-s of Sanit.tl:..icm District Number Four resolves as follows: 1. '11 he name of the consolidated district shall be Sanitation District Number Three of Orange County. 2. 'l'he ~;c~\'lcragc s2~s·tcm of District Number Four shRll be co~1solic1atec1 with District ·Number Three at no o:pens2 to District Number 'rhrcc. 3.· Upon the effective Clate. .of this consolicl.cltion, a 11 o £ th c a~-. s c: t. s and 1 i ab i 1 ii.: 'i es of Dist r i ct NurcJ)cr Four E;hc-~ll become the 0ssets und liabilities of the consol ida tcd di sLc ict, and said con sol i.dc!"te<l dis.trict shall asst·r.me all of th8 contra~t.ual 01)1 i-· gations. of D.i.stricl 1\'urnbc~r Four including lmt not limited to the Joint Exercise of PoKers Agreement b e-·'-·'·-:~::. ·'·} -C. t £· {°"'n-.. 1 B ~..,,,....~ -,•"lrl D··~ ct~• .~-'1':'" -:--.,,,., .'j·-,_. L.\,...._en L.)e .l. yo_ L),__c:..:; Cu.__n c. ... _ .. .L~ 3-lCl. i.U ... .O~l FOt!r C,1::-catincJ thf~ Seal Be21.ch nd!~d n:i.f;trat:ic. .. n Build- ing Autl1ority. Ag.enda Item .#49 X-11 District 3 .. 4. r1 1 hat co1~s0Li.d~·1·d.cm of Districts ri'h:'.:e0 ancJ Four f.JhC1.1J be effcct.i.vc July l, 19°/4. 5. · 'That all uncncuff1bcrcc1 funds, includinCJ cash, ancl 1:cceiv2blcs of District Nur.1bE~r ·Four shall be transferred to and 1x~corn2 ct parl of District Nurn1x~r IJ:hrec' c:.nd shci..D rc~du.cc the con sol id~t.ion fee by an aYCtount. equal to naid u.ncnc~u.:-:b~~rcd funds and ca.sh. and receivable;:> E:!Xi~.;U.ng as of Jnr.:c 30, -2- 197'1·. •••I •. 6. District Numbej: Four !::>ha.ll puy Dif,;trict Num1:)8J: 'J!hrec all oporat.in0 co~;b~ incurred l>y Di~.Jtrict Number 'f'l1l:ec; in t:cc;<i.ting ancl cl . .i.spoEiins_! of. \·wste ·. water fJ:·om D.i..~:;trict Nurn1x:!r Fcm:c until :.rnly 1, J.970. Di£::poE;al co~·~ts ate: hereby fixed ci.t. $.30 per rnilU.e>n go. J 1 on s o [ w L-1 f.: t. c \'.'a. t e J~ • 7. To pay Dist:r ic l.--. Nun',bcr rrh rec Cl.11 z:.n-icnn1t. equal i:.o six p~~r cent (6~0 per e:urnu;l1 of c:onsoliDe::tion fee from the~ dat(· of :reco:i::a.ation uf said consol:i c1~~.t.io11 with the Secretaj~y of St.ate to the effective~ of consolidci-· tion, July l, 1974. Nrn .. 7, TIIEREFO:~e, the Board of nir.ecto:i:-s of S2n itation District. · Number Four of Oransc: County he):cby resolvc~s to cni.:er into an agrcc!rncnt with S<~nit~i.t.ion Dis-C.:r:-ict Hmnb2r.-Ti1:-i~e:c for the consoli-- du~ion of SaniL:-t.:ion District Nurnl1cr rou:c \·.d.U1 Scmitation District Number Three; ancl. FURTlmR ru:~.:;·QJ_,\i!_2;S that the Ch.::tirmc:m and the I·:(1.nu.9cr Of Sanitation District Number F(mr are hereby authorized to 1;:~;ke applicc1tion to the Local l\gcncy rorrr.1ul:.ion co.~r~-n5...:_;s5.on fo:c t.112 consolidation of Sanitation Di~;trict Nnrnbcj: 'I'hrec ·and Sanit.c:.t.ion Districl ·Nnrn·- ber Four; and furtbc~r the Chc:irrnan 2ncl the I·i~:llElg·er of Surd.talion District nurr.bor Four are authorized to cxecut.c said agreement. PASSED, l~PPI?.OV~~~D, AND l\DOI,rrrm by the Bollrd of Directors of Sani- tation District Nm.1ber Four of Orange County a.t a rn2Gting thereof held on the .day of ___ , · 1972, by the follo'.'ling vote: AYES: Directors ------ NOES: Directors ABSENT: Direc~ors ----~--· Chairm2n A1'TEST: ------------~-Sec re t~try Agenda Item #49 :X-12 District 3 Don Fox attended ! ..,,/' #4 -Hemeon voted against minutes -felt that District 's Directors should be more responsible to the public #5 -(See notes to Joint Chairman -Ellis , Ramirez, J .A. Roberts, yl"M . Culbertson, J . Finias, T . Gutierrez, W. Hayden, D. Kinney and F . Schultz did not attend to receive ~~~ certificates) Reported on his meetings in Washington -met with AMSA and League of Cities people -fol l owed X:M:X itenerary set up by AMSA and League of Cities people -said they would incorporate the suggested words in the body of the bill (Blatnik) -last count he had bill will come up sometime between the 10th and 1 5th of thi s month and by then we should have some indication . Chairman reviews after staff furnishes it -Committee members X~ do not see it until it comes on the floor for H~X~ vote . 4 Griset on March ;>/,,..- Heard vote will be on the --24°th in the House -heard this 7th . Just -called executive committee meeting for Tuesday, March 28 at 5 :30 p.m . and invited Directors .Wot Wedaa and Winn to attend (FOLLOWI NG MEET I NG WINN INDICATED TO ME THAT HE WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO ATTEND AND WAS SENDING HIRTH IN HIS PLACE -CHAIRMAN JUST APPROVED SUBSTITUTION .) #8 -Culver -reported on Executive Committee actions Sims -on 9d -Can someone who i s not a District representative represent the Distri cts? Nisson -read from agr eement establishing SCCWRPA -11 the governing body of each such entity whi ch is a party to this agreement shall appoint one person as Commissioner and one person to attend as an e.l ternate . 11 Does not appear X~EOifili[KXX~X appointee · need be a Director . Miller -Commended Parsons and said he was most active member of Comm i ssion Parsons -there is a precedent for non-Director appointee -LA County 1 s representative i s not a Direc tor Hirth -Ask h i s city 1 s legal counsel fo r opinion as to someone other X.IDiX:M: than Councilman being appointed Director -said it could not be done -why is this different Just -We are talking about two different things here -Commissioner s are not regulated by Health and Safety Code #9(c) -Mcinnis -Orange County Water District agreement -item 2 of agreement -how long do we deliver 15 mgd of wastewater -is this in perpet~t ~-wastewater having little value today could have much value later FjlH -As to value, ye s it could go up Di tr· t d t d with regard to water reclam,ation · 0 ic 6 a op e policy £eon Mcinni s -Page 3 Item No . 3 -al ~o Paragrap h 3 5 t h line - "T he amount of wa s tewater brine will at no X~:M:XX t i me exceed 50% of wastewater treated" This i s not specific enough,shoul d't we have a limit on t h is FAH -There is a nri limit -not accept more t h an 7~ mgd of brine Mc i nni s -Can .M:M:M:fil§:XX not exceed :$I~ 15 mgd Mcinnis -Recommend that we take a longer look and a little longer time and go through this document very carefully -secondary treated wate r sometime in the future ~XX~fiXJr:M:~~ migh t be very valuable -by terms of this agreement we wi ll be giving K:WJ!~~X it a.way forever MS&DC -That thi s be held over to the first meeting and ask the General Counsel to go through and put definite l imits on open ended items . Weda.a -Some others may have recomme n dations -Can they call FAH Porter -Suggests commi tt ee -Wedaa Mcinnis and Smith appointed lO(b ) Why i s aud itors r epo r t for 1 st and 2nd quarter reviewed simultaneously JWS -Due to change in Uniform accounting law Finnell -What· value are these reports in lieu of non certification Finnell -They are very for t unate that t heir change in fees came up last month and not this month -perhaps vote would h ave b een different Parsons -Should : --; -.. ·-· .. _. audits be made only once a year Finnel l -For all we know t hey could have xeroxed Wayne 's statements Would like memo from audi tors as to wh at they did and h ow mu c h time spent on it Green -Wha t exactly do they do? Wayne They take quarterly repm rt and review as to classification of items -they summarize it in format -they have n ot checked into far R~ enough to extend an opinion Hyde -This does not take into account where we are in relati on to budget, etc . does it? JWS -No Christie -Why not have staff put out quarterly reports -feels Wayne's staff i s doing almcs t all of i t anyway FAH -Have t o check out legali t y of doing these at staff level MCWhinnlfy -Def er to t and recommendation nex meeting for staff to come back with repo r t It was moved, seconded and duly carried Thaty reports be received and ordered filed . #14 Herrin -Why 10 people going -why no t fewer number and come back and report -isn't this just as effective FAH -This is annual meeting of this association -M~ two meetings astually going on -first day operator's training school the fo llowing two days are more academic and we usua lly send our engineers and professional pe ople -also limiting expenditures on this -feels very definite benefit to the District in having a.s many as possible go to this meeting -will cost about $2 ,000 Wedaa -Thinks things like this for employees of the Districts Ni:rt are worthwhile and very few $1 s and time is well spent M/S/ & DC Herrin voted in opposition of this motion . #41 -Ordinance No . 714 -Nissan report ed that he h ad let Board pass this ordaincne in error -711 set out that all i ndu strial permit users and all cities be notified 30 days before any amendments considered to this ordinance Suggests Board take action to instruct h i m (CAN) to prepare another ordinance -limiting notification ~~M procedure to people who had filed a request with Secretary of the Board and Cities Miller -Is this an amendment to 711, industrial waste ordinance Nisson -Yes Smith -Do all industrial permit holders have to be notified at this time Nisson -Yes Griset moved nisson's suggest~d motion, s & de Miller -what about request from City of Orange to look at some lines -when will this be ready NXXX~~XX Smi t h -Looking at lines very important to Ci ty of Orange MIXXfilaXXE~M~XID[~M Nisson -we could not discuss ordinance at same time if this meeting to look at Orange 's problem is sc he dul e shortly due to time limitations Miller -WhaiF do we need now to send out notic e Niss on Just to ~M~~ authorize him to go ahead is enough #7 -adjourned to 5 :00 on the 21 st #49 -FAH -reported on proposed consolidation -in information submitted b y City of Seal Beach they state that total acreage of Districtt is 2,800 acres . Major portion ou t in the ocean -at present no service provided for this area -we currently provide some service to ocean area -in District No . 11 -possible to ~~ have to do this in future to District No . 4 Consolidation fee being considered equivalent to annexation fee -it i s not XP{X~~Mfili intent of the District, at staff leve l , to accept any fac i lity i n this area J that is too small -fac i lity will remain city 's ~JXXfilA facility -they have to maintai n and operate. This particular area has an estimated valuation of $27,000,000 . This generates in funds $127,000 here. There is however concern about 104 acres i n the District that are wi thin redevelopment agency in the city of Seal Beach . Ask General Counsel what affect this would have on ~X city 's ability to collect funds . In District No . 7 when people want to come into the District , but don 't have fee, it was put on tax rolls and collected XX over 5 year period . On this type of handling annexation fee, there is not interest provided for . Nisson -In effect District No . 4 wants to annex to No. 3 -the staff has posed certain questions which I will answer 1 . Yes, in my opinion it is -:miXXMXX I felt it necessary to have all four of these because District No . 4 has XX at l east a paper obligation and is a party to the Redevelopment Agreement . Wants sewage service in there because ~X~XM~~X3X hold No. 3 harmless - Only obligation No . 4 has under this agreement is to pay $2,500 a year for a lease to the City . They are going to cancel this lease under this agreement and will RRX15m have no X~HX~XX obligation monitarily under this redevelopment agreement 2 . This gave more X of a problem but the ~~~~~XXX~XX absence of anything known to the contrary, I think it can . Code Section we are hoping to proceed under is where both boards of No . 3 and No . 4 be unanimous vote of all of their members agree to consolidate under terms and conditions they agree on . Then go before LAFC -they can not RaN:N~x change terms of agreement without giving District notice and then they can file objection -the effective date of agreement can be X~X~~~XXNXXX~~ part of consolidation agreement . ill ~1 L~ I~ (_,, L. .- / ' ' 3, T*~X~ Their attorneys think it is proper and I ~~K~N~ am inclined to agree with them . 4 . Purpose of redevelopment agency is to take section of city that is sub -par and make it more desirable. This takes land off publ i c tax rolls - Hyde -Redevelopment agency will still be there -since no other entity can tx redevelopment agency how will we get mo n ey Nisson -We will get money when redevelopment agency terminates Dennis -The present plan is to have it now for 15 years Hyde -How can it be extended De nnis -By order of re development body Green -How about in :XXN~ leiu fees since no taxes Nisson -Cou l d be done -doea n 1 t Nnow assessed valuation at present time Holden -Redevelopment agency has not taken anything away from any one . Taxes on the increased value are the only thing not taxable -land improvements have uped value of X:XID[X land Dennis -No. 4 came into existence in 1966 -tax rate of 40¢ Actual operation cost 30¢ -assuming same efficiency as staff of #4, there will be plenty of money left over 5 . T*XXXllX~XX~XXXMXX It is a fact that #4 will come in without any liability and the City of Seal Beach is guaranteeing that under the Redevelopment Agency . They have no bonded indebtedness -as soon as this area is consolidated it wil l help to pay all bonded i ndebtedness District No . 3 has McWhinney -What will staff recommendation be I . 11 ,t·~~~FAH -Thinks this is right thing to do -it fits into plan of f ~ ~~' interim basin plan of State Board -about 2/3 of the funds that V, X~Kl§ are being taxes for District No. 3 x:x:~x~u::xxxY.iX]rnX:X~K~X)('.XK~~ ~~ are for long range construction program . In the case of Seal (·V Bea.ch area once they get t his problem r e solved XKM/no longer have treatment facilities to worry about they rn..c \.l'I Y\ cWhinney -S e ems economically wise -instruct staff to go ahead and study inancial arr gements, plans, etc for proposed consolidation of District No . 4-Set up meeting of No . 3, No. 4 and City of Seal Beach only to discuss proposed consolidation ~ / ' J Nisson -two staffs worked up figures and idea and Seal Beach people came into picture and worked on documents. We could list all ~KX~2£XX~~X obligations, etc . if we wanted to McWhi nney -Called for question Moved , seconded and duly carried Hyde -Redeve lopment agency should be checked out -also in lieu fees