The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1972-02-09'I I, ii I .I II -~1 1 i so.~ao s OF i Jm EC TOR S Co un ty Sanitation Districts of Ora nge County, Ca lifornia v (l) v (2) /( 3) F e bruary 9 , 1 97 2 -7 :3 0 p .m. Pledge of All egiance and I nvocation Roll Call Appointmen t of Cha i rman pro tern , i f n e c essary P. 0. Box 5175 10844 ~llis Ave nue Founta in Valley, Ca li f., 92708 AGENDA AD JOURNMENTS P OST ~ COMP & MILEAGE JC .... - FILES SET UP ....... z.:::::~ RESOLUTI ONS CERTIFltD .... WTERS V/:llTTEN ... ~-· Ml iWTES wr1mE 1 (..~ .. MI NUTES tlLED .... V.. .... " CY EACH DIS TRI CT Consideration of motions approving minutes of the fol lowing meetings , as ma i led : ~ --pt M/s t./ @ _, ....., ./ Dist r ict 1 ./ Distri c t 2 .,,, Dis t rj_ct 3 ,/District 5 i1 District 6 /District 7 v Dist r ict 11 ALL DISTRICTS January 1 2 , 1972 regul a r Mi s January 12, 1972 regular IV1 Js January 12, 1 9 72 r egular and M/s February 3, 1 972 special January 12 , 1972 regular M/s January 1 2 , 1 972 r egula r January 1 2 , 1972 re gular and January 25 , 1 972 adj ourned l January 1 2 , 1972 re gular /Vii ~ Report of the Joint Ch airman ALL DIS TRI CTS Report of the General Manage r ALL DISTR I CTS Report of the General Counsel ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of' motion to r eceive a nd f i le the Comrn.ittee 's writte n r eport Ml~ ALL DISTRICTS Conside ration of ac t ion on i tems r ecommended by t he Ex~c ·ve Committee : F:te 1J.A .... (.9-) Consideration of Resolut i on No . 7 2 -1 1 , • a-~~d ~~" D o solu~inn No 6h 3 (p l ~ tEr r-n . .... ..... """'u."-J.• -'-••o J.•'-' v ....... ...., ....... , • , ~ ' '~.u ....... ~s o f Procedure fo r Mee t i ngs ), as amended , b y t he addi t ion of a Section 18 entitled "At tendance Defined ", as prepar ed by t he Ge n e r a l Counse l . See page 11 D11 A/C .... TKL R •••• _ .. U••H•••••HO•O•O OO. 1 .................. -.. t..••·"'1' (b) FILE ••••• UA ..... LEITER JL . \ ./ ~~-=:~~~~@ s Co n sideration of Resolution No . 7 2 -1 2 , a uthorizing revi sion in fee schedul e for Distri cts 1 auditor, Hanson, Peterson, Cowles and Syl vester , Certified Public Accountants , subject to Wa ge -P ri ce Bo ard di r ecti ves . Se e p age 11 E 11 ... ~ .......... ~ (c) Consideration of mot i on t o receive , fi l e a n d F i l~ ... ~T .. .. LETIER . .V ........ \ v. A/C ...• TK LR ...• / ::::~~~::~~ s a ccep t proposal submitted by J ohn Caro l lo Eng i nee r s d a ted Jan uary 18 , 1972 , t o prepare a 1972 Maste r Plan Repor t and P reliminary De sign S t u dy to e .stablish the future needs for expansion and i mproveme nt of the tre atment works ; and a u thori z i ng t he Ge n e ral Manage r t o di r ec t the engineers to p roceed with the p r eparation of said Master Pl an r eport on a p er diem fee basis with a maximum o f $98 ,ooo , said fee is a part of t he final design fee and i s to b e deduct ed the r e from at the time actual design is authori zed by t he Boards of Di recto r s . (10 ) ALL DISTRICTS * * * * * * * * * CONSENT CALENDAR All mat ters placed on the consent cal endar are c onside r ed as not r equiring discussion o r furthe r explanation and unless any particular i t em is requested to be remove d f r om t he cons ent calendar by a Director , s t aff member , or memb e r of the public i n a t tendance , there wil l be no separate discussion of t he s e items . All i t em s on the con se nt calendar wil l be enac te d by one action approving all mo t ion s , and cas t ing a u n animous bal lot for re s olutions included on the cons e nt cal endar . Al l items r em o ved from the cons e nt cale ndar shall be conside r ed separately in the re gul a r orde r of b u sines s. Mem b ers of the publ i c who wish to r em o ve an it em from t h e c o nsent cal endar shal l, upon r ecognition by the chair , state their name , address a nd design at e by letter the item to b e removed from t he consent calendar . * * * * * * * * * * Chairman wil l d e termine if any items are to be d e lete d f r om the consent calendar . Co n sideration of action to app r ove a l l agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically r em oved from same . -2 - (10) ALL DISTRICTS -CONSENT CALENDAR CONTINUED (a) FILE NAI ··- LEnER .v.'(b ~ A /C •... TKL R ··- v --··-········· .. ··- ..................... u .... (c) (d ) v (e) / m ~ .ttA. ....... . Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 1 , to the plans and specifications for Power Re liability Project at Reclamation Plant No . 1 Job No . Pl -6 -1 , a u thorizing an addition of $7 ,977 .SS and an 81 calendar day extension of time , to the contract with Freeman Electric Construction Co . See page 11 F 11 Consideration of Resolution No . 72-13, accepting Power Reliability Project at Rec lamation Plant No . 1 , J ob No . Pl -6 -1 , as complete; and authorizing execution o f a Notice of Completion therefor . See page 11 G11 ----- Consideration of motion to receive and file l etter from John Carollo Enginee rs, dated January 27 , 1972, advising that the internal inspection of Ocean Outfall No . 2 has verified that the pi~e sections in question are stabilized . See page 11 H '. Consideration of motion authorizing two staff members to attend concurrent meetings of the Water Pollution Control Federation -Legislative Seminar -and the Ass oc i ation of Metropolitan Sewe r age Agencies , and to meet with Fede ral water pollution control offic ials concerning pending legislation and future Districts .' project funding , in Washington , D.C., the week of March 13th; and authorizing reimbursement of transportat ion, lodging , meals and incidental expenses incurred Conside ration of motion authorizing payment to the Standard Oil Company for relocation of power pol es to accomodate construction of the I nterplant I nfl uent Interceptor, Job No . I -8 , in the total amount of $2,566.92 . See page 11 I 11 LEITER ........ (.f) Consideration of motion authoriz i ng the General MCt.nager N e .... TKLr. .•.• to issue purchase orde r to Johnson Pump Compa:ny for 1.fi.a: ................ v conversion of recirculation pump for an amount not to fl"'--················· exceed $10 ,000 .00, plus tax and f re i ght. See page 11 J 11 F.L': .. N.A. ... U~) Consideration of motion authorizing ti.~ General Manager mm·············· ¥issue purchase order for replaceme nt pmnp parts for A/c .... r 1<LR .•.• t/~~_:-inch Fairbanks -Morse raw sew·age pumps for an amount -··-······-········· not to exceed $10,000 .00 , plus tax and freight . See page (h) Conside ration of the following resolutions authorizing and dire cting execution and fi ling of docuinents necessary for Federal Grants under 33 U.S .C., 466 e t seq . and J State Grants under Cl ean Water Bond Law of 1 970 , for 1971-7 2 Joint Works Improvements (i) District No . Resolution No . ./2 72-15 -2 ./3 72-16-3 ./5 7 2 -17-5 ~6 72 -1 8 -6 /11 72 -19-7 72 -20 -11 /l 72 -14-1 See page "L" Conside ration of motion approving Ch ange Order No . 2 to the plans and specification s for Headworlrn "c" Expans ion at Pl ant No . 2 , Job No . P 2 -ll-l, authorizing a · 21 cale ndar day e xtens ion o f time and an addition of $6 , 744-o 00 , to the contract with E .T .I . and K or~ick , a Joint Venture . See page 11 M11 , -X--X· +_c ·X· -l<· ·X· ·lt--l<· 3 , -- (ll ) (1 2 ) ./ vG M\s ALL DISTRICTS Further consideration of Repo rt of Special Committee Studying Directors ' Fees Schedul e deferred from previous meeting . (Copy in meeting folders .) ALL DISTRICTS Conside rat ion of mo tio n to rece i ve a nd fi l e r e p o r t of Di rec t o r o f Finance o n mid -year b u dge t review . (Copies e nc losed .) (14) ALL DISTRICTS ./$\ of the General Manage r that he has checked all bills \ Conside ration of mo t ion to receive and fi l e certi fication v/1~\ S appearing on the agenda , found them to be in o r der , and t hat h e r e c omrnends a uthorization for payment (15) ~\s v (16 ) (17) \(1 8 ) ~$ (19) ~ (20) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration o f r o l l call vote mo t ion approving Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving warrant books for signature of the Chairman of District No . 1 , and autho r izin g payment of c l aims listed on page "A " ---- ALL J2.I.STR I CTS ,....--/ Other ~ess ~co~ica~, if,JilY DIS TRIC I Co derat~mo t ion ~oving epage ~ ~ /...,... __ _ DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Conside ration of mot i on approvin ?, warrants, if any . See page 11 C' war~ i _>/any. suspense fund DI STRICT Othe us~n,cY'CO~:a:teat;_g.ns , if any DISTRICT 1 Cf/ /:5 Considerati on of motion to adjourn ~(2 1) DI STRICT 2 ('/\\ 6 Consideration of motion approving warrants , if any . J \ ~ See page 11 B11 ~mmf!g~ ~ /"Ot e~.'...uess an~~icati-ens , i~ vf23 ) (25 ) DISTRICT 2 Conside ration of motion to adjourn DIST RICT 3 Con side rati on of motion approving Chang e Order No . 4 t o the plans and specifications for Beach Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 17 , 18 & 19 , Contract No. 3 -16 , authorizin g an addition of $1,137 .50, to the contract with .M e rco Construction Engineers, Inc . See page 11 N11 ---- DIST RIC T 3 Consideration of motion approving Change Orde r No . 5 to the plans and specifications for Be ach Relief Trunk Sewe r, Reaches 17, 1 8 & 19, Con tract No . 3 -16, adju~ting engineer 's quantities, and authorizing addition of $3 ,L W9 .15 , to the contract with Me :rco Construction Engin ee rs, Inc . See page 110 11 ~ DIST RICT 3 ~ Ve rbal report of staff in connection wit h r e quest of Hall & Foreman ,, Inc . for servi ce of a 20 -acre parcel of land located in Los Ange l es County DIST RICT 3 Consi de ration of motion approvi n g warrants, if any . See page 11 B " DIST RICTS 3 & 11 Considera0ion of mo tion approving susp e nse fund warrants, if any. See page 11 B 11 DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 5 Con s ideration of mo tion approving warrants, if any . See page 11 B 11 DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Consideration of motion approvinfi susp ense fund warrants, if any . Se e p age 11 B 1 DIST RICT 5 Other business and communications, if any (34) DIST RICT 5 C\ ',I/~ Consideration of motion to adjourn \ rfa I STRICT 6 ~ a ti on ~ti on approving wamnts, if ~nyt (367"~T R ICT'&... ~er blishle-ss an~uni~io ns ,_J..f arzy v ( 37 ) DIST RICT 6 C')7 Conside ration of motion to adjourn er ,~ ,t- Frl e f':)_f\..J38) DIST RICT 11 LETTE R v.___ Con s ide ration o f Re solution No . 72-21-11, approving · ··········· v-' plans and specifications for Kno tt Inte rceptor , a AJc .... TKLR -~-Port ion of Reach l ,and Reaches 2 and 3, Contract No . 3-17; -·-·············~··· c..., and autho rizing adve rtising fo r bids to be opened Ma rch 9 , I "P" , -~··-········· ··•"4 1 97 2 , at 1 1 : 00 a .m. See page (39) DISTRICT 11 . Consi de ration of Res olution No . 72 -22-11, authoriz ing and L, directing execution and filing of doctun e nts n e cessary for v ~ :.J F ede ral Grant under 33 U.S . C., 466 e t seq ., and State Grant under ~ly,an Water Bond Law of 1 970, f or K11ott Inte rc e ptor . See page Q 1 ----(40 ) DIST 'ICT 11 ~ .~ Con s ·d e ra0 io~f motion aPls..rovi ng wa rr~s , if .~ . ~ See p 0 11 C 11 ~ --~ (~) p ISTR~ 1 1 \ , ~ Ot herb\}s ine ss ~nd c omrr\.unicat i [ons , if a ny (42 ) DI STRICT 11 \ l Cy , V Conside r a0 i o n of motion to adjourn I < :)_ 3 -5- /( 43) DISTRICT 7 'F rti: ·······:···~ Consideration of Resolution No . 72-23 -7 _, authorizing t mER .. .Y ... ~. v e xecution of License Ag reement with Atchison _, Topeka N e .... r~tp.\-c._ and Santa Fe Ra.ilway Company _, relative to c r ossing of ------p .. \.~'7 right -of-wa¥r fo:c construction of Con tract No . 7-6-4 . r ____ ................. See page 1 R11 . (44) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of adoption of Ordinance No . 714_, amen ding 1 existing connection and use ordinance_, as prepared by General Counsel. See page 11 s 11 • (45) DISTRICT 7 FILE ... :=:::: .. _ (a) ~~::: .. ~~:~\_ 7 -·-··--......... !\ -1:1;:E··-:.-:::.:::-.£ LETIE ?. .V. ....... \ (b) v ~-~ ... ::::~~~-~ .. -~::~ ~ -····-·················- ( 46) DIST RI CT 7 ----· Consideration of mot i on to receive and file l etter fr om H. Lawson Mead, dated F e bruary 3, 1972, requesting District adopt resolution initiating pro ceedings for Ch apman Avenue East Annexation . See page 'jT 11 Con s ideration of Resolution No . 72-24 -7, a uthorizing initiation of proceeding s to annex territory to the District (Annexation No . 25 -Chapman East Annexation .) See page 11 u11 V" ~-~· ;-Con s ide ration of motion approv ing wa rrants , if any . I "'\ -:J See pag e 11 C11 (47 t\ QIST}=CT 7 '\ "'-..Oth~usin'e-s...s and commun ~ati O'Rs , ~f c\n Y j (48 ) DIST RICT 7 Consid e ration of motion t o adjourn -6- II " MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT -· County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8 127 l 0844 Ellis Aven'ue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS REG UL.AR MEET ING Wednesday, February 9, 1972 7:30 p.m. Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 February 4, 1972 The following is a brief explanation of the more important non- routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but will appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting. Joint Boards No. 6 -REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER: The efforts of our Directors and staff re garding pending Federal legislation on water pollution control and the ocean discharge policy of the State Water Resources Control Board, currently being considered, will be reported on. Director Lorin Griset was in Washington, D.C. last week and was successful in holding meaningful discuss ions with key legis lators and staff personnel who are involved in the writing of the House of Representatives version of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (see attached memorandum). Nos. 8 and 9 -REPORT OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND ACTIONS ON CO~IlfiITTEE'S RECO MMENDATIONS: The Committee met on the evening of Ja~uary 25 with Directors Harvey and Qu i gley as g uests. A report of the meeting, together with recomme~da ti ons to the Boards was mailed to the Directors on February 2. Item No. 9 (a through c) is consideration of actions recommended by the Committee to the Joint Boards. No. 10 -CONSENT CALENDAR: The following agenda items fall into this category in accordance with the definition established by the Boards. (a & b) Closeout of Plant Contract No . Pl-6-1 -This contract, Power Reliab ility Project at Reclamation Plant No. 1, was satisfact orily completed on January 31 by Freeman Electric Construction Company of Long Beach. Item (a) is consideration of a change order adding the sum of $7977.88 to the contract for the work described in the formal change order included with the a g enda material. It will be noted that a large portion of this sum ($7488) was for an extension of a 12-conduit duct bank to supply electrical power to future support facilities (c) (d) (e) (f) now under design. This extension was accomplished at this time in order to avoid tearing up pavement to be installed as part of the contract for the new vehicle maintenance building now under construction. We were fortunate in having two contractors at the job site from whom to obtain quotations for this extra work. The quotation received from Freeman Electric Construc- tion Company was some $3500 less than the contractor for the vehicle maintenance building. Item (b) is the customary resolution accepting the job as complete and authorizing filing of a Notice of Completion. Report of Engineers on Internal Insoection of Ocean Outfa~l No . 2 -This report, dated January 27, is in- cluded with the agenda material and is self-explanatory. The internal inspection, as authorized at the January meeting, was successfully conducted on January 26. Attendance at March Le islative Seminar in Washin ton - For the past severa years the Water Pol ution Control Federation has sponsored this seminar to which key congressmen are invited. It is anticipated that the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, to which the Districts belong, will also be holding con- current meetings. It has been customary to authorize attendance of Districts' representatives. The Directors are aware of the value of participating in these meetings, particularly with respect to the two associations' activities relating to construction grants and Federal reg ulations affecting our operations. It is recommended that two staff members be authorized to attend this seminar and also to me et with Federal Water Pollution Control officials in Wa shington to discuss pending leg islation and Districts' future project funding. Authorization of Pa .. ent for Relocation of Powe r Poles, P an Jo o. I--A memoran urn on T. 11s su Jec , ate January 26, from the Deputy Chief Eng ineer is included with the agenda material. The staff recommends autho- rization to pay Standard Oil Company the sum of $2566.92 for this work. Authorizing Purcha se Order for Conversion of Recircu- lation Pump -Included with the agenda material is a memoran dum from our Maintenance Superintendent on the above subject, which we believe to be self-explanatory. The Johnson Pump Company of Pasadena is the original manufacturer of this pump and consequently is best qualifie d to undertake the worlc. We therefore recom- mend the authorization of issuance of a purchase order to this Company for supplying the equipment listed and supervising its installation for a maximlllil sum not to exceed $10,000. -2- -~ . ~- (g) . (h) (i) Authorizing Issuance of Purchase Order for Replacement Pump Parts -Also included with the agenda mat erial is a memorandum from our Maintenance Superintendent on this subject. It is obvious that by·having these impellers and wearing rings cast by a local foundry a substantial savings will be realized. We therefore recommend authorization to proceed to acquire these parts in the manner recommended by our Maintenance Superintendent for a maximum sum not to exceed $10,000 • Authorizing Applications for Federal Grants -These resolutions, by each Dist rict, are required in order for the Districts to apply for State and Federal grant funds on our fiscal year 1971-72 plant projects . The required project report is now under consideration by the State Water Resources Control Board and i f approved, we will be notified that an application for grants totaling 80% of the project cost can be filed. Since this approval may be forthcoming in a few weeks, we recommend adoption of the resolutions at this time. Change Order No. 2 to Plant Job No. P2 -ll-l -This recomme nded change order adds the sum of $6744 to this $1. 3 million contract ( Headworks "c 11 Expansion at Plant No . 2) for the extra work described in the formal change order included with the a genda material . No. 12 -CONSIDERATIO N OF REPORT OF SPECIAL COMMITTEE STUDYING DIR ECTORS ' FEES SCHEDULE: As directed by the Boards at the January meeting, further consideration of the r eport submitted by the Special Committ ee (copy in agenda folders at the meeting) is scheduled f or this meeting. District No. 3, at a special meeting held on February 3, endorsed Alternative 4 as set forth in the r ep ort. Chairman Smith has called a special meeting of the Board of District No . 2 to consider the Committee 's report at 6:30 p.m., February 9, immediately preceding the Joint Board meet ing . No. 13 -MID-YEAR BUDGET REVIEW: Mr . Sylvester will present a report on our operatin g and capital outlay expenditures during the first half of this fiscal year compared with 1971-72 budget amounts . Material on this s ubject is included in this mailing . District No. 3 Nos. 24 and 25 -CHANGE ORDERS NOS . 4 AND 5 FOR CONTRACT NO. 3-16: This job, Beach Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 17, 18, a nd 1 9, is practi- cally complete but not re ady for acceptance owing to negotiations being conducted with the contractor over his claim for extra compensation for unanticipated compaction requireme nt s of the State Divis ion of Highways. However we recommend, at this time, the adoption of these -3- two change orders as included with the agenda material. Change Order No. 4 adds the sum of $1137.50 to the contract for replacement of a defective existing local manhole and Change Order No. 5 is the customary adjustment in contract price to reflect quantities of material actually installed on a unit price basis as compared with the quantities originally estimated. This particular adjustment will add the sum of $3409.15 to the contract amount. No. 26 -VERBAL REPORT OF STAFF CONCERNING REQUEST FOR SEWERAGE SERVICE FOR LAND IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY: The Directors will recall that a letter from the engineers for a developer of a 20-acre parcel in Los Angeles County, adjacent to the District, was received and filed and referred to the staff for study and r eport . A verbal report will be presented, after which the Board may wish to indicate its attitude concerning this request. District No. 11 No. 38 -AUTHORIZING ADVERTISING FOR BIDS FOR KNO'IT INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACT NO. 3-17: Action app roving the plans and specifications for this facility was deferred fr om t he January meet i ng because of some possible construction conflict with the State Division of Highways. This matter has now been resolved and the plans and specifications are ready for approval. District No . 3, at a special meeting on February 3, has already taken identical action. We reconn:nend a bid opening date of Thursday, Ma rch 9 , 1972, at 11:00 a.m. This project consists of the install ation of five mi les of 96 -inch diamete r reinforced concrete sewer from the intersection of Ellis Avenue and Brookhurs t Street to the intersection of Bolsa Avenue and Newland Street . The estimated contract cost for this project i s $6,354,ooo, for which we are hop eful of obtaining some State and Fede r al funding fo r an as yet undetermined amo u nt. District No. 11 will participate in 13.7% of the project cost from the lower end to the intersection of Slater Avenue and Newland Street. This intercep tor sewer conforms closely to the adopted Master Plan of Sewer Facilities in District No . 3 and the long-range plans of District No. 11. No. 39 -APPLICATION FOR STATE AND FEDERAL GRANTS FOR CONTRACT NO. 3-17: The recommended resolution, included with the agenda mate rial, autho- rizes the app lic ation for State and Federal g r ants on the a bove - descri be d project. District No. 7 No. 43 -LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH SANTA FE RAILROAD FOR CONT RAC T NO. 7-6-4: The Santa Fe Railroad Company requires a formal license agreement to be executed by the Dist rict for a soon to be construc ted crossing of the railroad right of way on Red Hill Avenue under this contract. -4- ~ No. 44 -AMENDMENT TO DISTRICT'S CONNECTION CHARGE ORDINANCE: At the January 25 adjourned meeting of the Board, the General Counsel was directed to prepare an amendment to the District's existing connection and use ordinance incre as ing the connection charges for multiple dwellings. The General Counsel advi s es that he is preparing the pro- posed amendment, which will be available by the time of the meeting. No. 45 -INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION NO. 25: The Directors will recall that previous action was taken on this proposed 9.52 acre annexation to direct the eng ineers to proceed to draw up the necessary legal description and to obtain a petition from the property owner. Included with the agenda material is a letter from the attorney for the proponents advising that the required signatures on the petition cannot be obtained f orthwith. According ly we recommend, in order to expedite proceedings for Assessme nt District No . 9, the adoption of the resolution included with the agenda material initiating proceed- ings directly by the District. -5- Fred A. Harper General Manager / January 27, 1972 MEMORANDUM ON H. R. 11896 -A BILL TO AMEND THE FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CON- TROL ACT (BLATNIK BILL) HOUSE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE TO: FRED A. HARPER, GENERAL MANAGER, ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS FROM: DIRECTOR LORIN GRISET, MAYOR, CITY OF SANTA ANA · The impression I r€ceiyed from Dick Sullivan (Ch~ef Counsel, Public Works Committee, House of Representatives) and Phil Cummings (Legislative Assistant to Senator Muskie) was that the existing language in the proposed Bill (both the Senate and House versions) would permit the Administrator to approve other methods of water treatment for effluent in deep ocean than that of secondary treatment providing the discharging agency could prove that the effect on the environ- ment was as good as secondary treatment. The suggestion was made by Sullivan that wording be put in the House Report on the Bill which clarified this intent. He suggested that Lee White (Legislative Advocate for the Association of Metro- politan Sewerage Agencies) put the wording together which he would use. Lee White then asked me to have you send several paragraphs of wording which he could use as a guide. . Congressman Glenn M. Anderson of San Pedro (member of the House Public Works Committee) asked me if I was sure that the wording in the Bill expressed the intent which we desired because nothing in the Report could change the Bill if the intent was not expressed in it. Anderson had heard nothing from Los Angeles County so he was concerned about that. Congressman Donald H. Clausen (member of the House Public Works Committee) was extremely concerned about the bad press which the House received on the Bill when he maintained they were trying to do a responsible job on the inferior job done by the Senate. He wanted the National League of Cities to get some good publicity for the House. I firmly believe that Clausen would support the kind of changes we want. It would be good to get as much information as possible into his .. hands. Phil Cummings was very cooperative and particularly wanted copies of our. industrial waste ordinance and how.we enforce it. Larry Snowhite of the National League of Cities and the United States Council of Mayors was very helpful and accompanied me on all of the contacts. He has been extremely close to the whole picture and would advise getting his input before formulating final conclusions or suggestions. Lee White of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies is highly regarded by people on The Hill and is the logical man to do the final legal work. -------------- G,ris et v Bat tin V' Mill e r _K_ Porb~r v - 1'1:STJUCT 2 Sm ith _L_ Christie ~ Clar k , Rob t. _.a_ Culv er v F innell -:;,- Herrin -; Just v Phillips .J Sims ~ Step hens on _L_ Wedaa v Winn ~ DI STRICT 3 hyGe = ./ Battin ~ Be r ton ~ Christ i e _£___ Clark, Robt . _a_ Culver ~ Davis Green Hai.,.pe r Harvey ·He rrin JL_ v v v ..L Hemeon v Holde n V · Mc Whi.nney _L Sims . v Stephenson ·7 DISTRICT 5 --v Far sons Caspe r s ~ Hirth ~ DISTHICT 6 P o rter _./_ Caspers ..a_ . Mcinnis .JL_ DIST RICT 7 Miller ~ . Clark_, Ralp ll..L Qui g ley a_ Gris et. L_ Porte r Hego r..- ··· '.th DISTRICT 11 Shipley--=~ Baker _a _ Co e n ~ ~T HICT 8 Eoyct Caspers Mit che ll Herrin Caspers Coco Hileman Root Jackson Gom e .z Gris et Harper Caspers Zuni g a Dutton Machado Schniepp Kroe s en Caspers Westra Root Jackson Fonte McCracken Jus t Kanel Griset Lewi s Barnes Zuniga Dutton Croul · Hi rth Coco Caspers Fischback He rrin Hirth Hileman McC r a cken Caspers Goldberg Ti.'.::e 1 ·.-; 0 Districts ~ ------- CR\ LLS - - - -J o:pi'I' .Just Baker Battin Berton 0 0 A?cDS v' Harper _a_ Caspers ,,,.,-Cas pers -::::::-we s tra Caspers _a_ Ch ris tie ,,...... Root Cl ark _, Robt. a <J ackson Clark _,Ral pn ,/-Caspers Coen ::Z Cu l ver v- Davis . -::;-Fonte Finnell :;-oomez Quigley -;a--Fishbach Green -::::=-Mc Cracken Gris et -;:;-Herrin Har P M v Just Ha rve y v Ka nel He meon -i:;-Lewis He rrin v Griset Hi r t h ~Crou l Hol den v Bo g ard Hy de -::::;-Kr oes en Mc Innis V-Hirth .Mc Wh i nne y ,CL_ i.'1i lle r v Coco Parsons ,_,. Phil l ips ~Caspers Port er Roge !il o ~Hir th Shi ple y -::::-~~c C rackf;n S i ms -~-zunig a Smit h ~Hileman S tep!:enson ~Dutto n i·!ed aa ~r.:ach ado Winn V Sc:--_n i cpp * * -K· Mi tc-he ll Boyd ==Gold.berg OTHERS Harper Brm·m Sylveste r L ewis Dunn Cl arke Sigler Crabb T-a'f \ o., U), \\, 'b.>IV\$ Carlson Fins ter Gallo\·iay Ho hene !' Hunt Keith . Lowry .Maddox Mar tinson Nis sen Piers a ll S tevens Me-a~ M V'rO"l\t. y ~o e.t\'t'\e.r s~°"'" ?~\e't'S DI S'l'HICT 1 Gris et Battin Miller P o :r>te1· Jl"T:STRICT 2 Smith Christie Clark, Robt .-- Culver ·- Finnell Herrin Just P h i llips Sims Stephenson -- Wedaa Winn DISTRI C'I' 3 mrcre -..::/- Batt in -¥- Be rton n_ Ch r istie _a_ C l ar~ Robt . _a_ Culver .:f-_ Davis " Green ~ H:O:Ppl ~ _a_ Harvey _n_ Herrin .!)_ Hemeon ~ Holden .d_- McWhinney .:J__ Sims Jl..._ Ste phenson n_ DIST·PJ:CT 5 Parsons Caspe rs Hirth DISTRICT 6 Porter Caspers . Mcin_Y)is DISTRICT 7 Miller Clark, Ralpl'l__ Quigley Griset Porter Roge:cs r -Lth ... DISTRICT 11 Shipley Baker Coen DISTRICT 8 ----......----Boyd Caspers Mitchell Herrin Caspers Coco Hileman Root Jackson Gome .z Gris et Harper Caspers Zuniga Dutton Machado Schniepp Kroes en Caspe rs Westra Root J ackson Fonte McC racken Just Kanel Gris et Lewis Barnes Zuniga Dutton . Croul · Hirth Coco Caspers Fischback Herrin Hirth Hileman .M cCracken Caspers Goldberg TiJ2e ~~~~-~~ Districts ?lf'-:3 JOI NT I3 0A?cDS -..--...... ~ ·~\ '7-:J.--JI Mot .-~~Fa:.\~d ~., --. Just Baker Battin Berton Caspe rs Harper ==Caspers Caspers Westra Christie --Root Clark, Robt.--.J ackson Clark, Ralpli--Ca spers Coen - Culver Davis . Finnell Quigley Green Gris et Harper Harvey Hemeon Herrin ~ Hirth Holden -Hyde Mc Innis Mc Wh inney Miller Parsons -Fonte -Gomez Fishbach -McCracken Herrin Just -Kanel --Lewis -Griset --croul --Hogard --Kroes en --Hi r th --coco Phillips -caspers Porter Rogers --Hirt h Shipley -Mc Crack en Sims -Zun i ga Smith -Hileman S t ep h enson --Dutton Wedaa --Machado Wi nn --scr,r1iepp * -)(-* Mite-hell Bo yd :==Goldberg OTHERS Harper Brovm Sylves ter Lewis Dunn Clarke Sigler Crabb Carlson Finster Gall oway Ho hener Hunt Keith Lowry' Maddox Martin.son Niss on Piersall Stevens DI S T RI CT 1 Gris et Battin Mille r Porter TYrSTRICT 2 ------ Smith fl Christie ~ Clark, Robt . _..:a_ Culver _Q_ Finne ll .h-.. Herrin ..n._ Just n_ Phi llips 't-- Sims -X-- Stephenson n Wedaa ~ Winn --¥- DISTRICT 3 tiycre--~ Battin " ---r-Berton ..a_ Christie ~ Clark, Robt. _:a_ Culver .LL.. Davis Green Ha:~e-3'.' Harvey -Herrin He meon Hold e n .n- Yn .o_ ..n_ ~- Mc Whinney -1-;- S im s _ .:¥- Stephenson _n_ DISTRICT 5 Par sons Caspers Hirth DISTRICT Porter Ca s pers . Mcinnis DISTRICT 7 Miller _!L_ _ C~ark , R alp ~ Qui g ley .a_ Gris et +,- Porter .:/- -Rog e rs -1- r· ;_th _n_ -·· Herrin Caspers Coco Hileman Root Jackson Gome.z Gri s et Harper Caspers Zuni ga Dutton Mac h ado Schniepp Kroe s en Casp e rs Wes t ra Root Jacks o n Fonte McCracke Just Kanel Gris e t Le wis Barne s Zuniga Dutton . Croul - Hirth} Coco Caspe r s Fischbac Herrin Hirth Hileman T i.1:2.e -------Dis tricts b , -',.5 , b J 7 ct fl JOI NT BOA?.DS ,,..,.......,..------~ N\o"'i ~o n ~a\\ed l·l (He.) N\o'Hon ta·~e~ 'l·Y MoT\o~ ~~\\e.~ ~-7 ~~\ OY\ Fa\\e.c\ l .. \ l "t~e) N\o\° \ OV"\ 9h.ss.e.~ l\-~ Just Bake r Battin Berton Caspers Harp er --Ca s p ers __ Casp e rs Westra Christie Root Cl ark , Robt.--,Jackson Clark ,Ral pn--caspers Coen -- Cu l ver Davis . Finnell Quigley Green Griset Harper Harvey Hemeon Herrin Hirth · Holden Hy de Mc Innis Mc Wh inney Miller Parsons --F onte --Gomez Fishbach --McCracke n He rrin Just -Kanel --Lewis --Griset --croul -Bogard -Kroes en --Hirt h --coco Phillips -c aspers Porter -Rogers -Hirth S h ipley --Mc Cracken Slms --z uni g a Smith --Hileman Steph enson --Du tto n We daa ~-M ac h ado Winn --s c i.l.niepp -K--J(-* Mi tc-h ell Boyd OT HERS Harper Brown Sylvester L ewis Dunn Clarke Sigler Crabb ==Goldberg DISTRICT Shipley Ba ker Coen Mc Cracken] Caspers Mot\oV> ~-a.,\e& ::l -0 Carlson Fins ter Galloway Hohene r Hunt Ke i th L o wry Ma d dox Martins on Niss on Piersall Stevens DISTRICT 8 EO'YO~~--__ ·Go l db e rg Cas p ers Mitche ll Meet:j_.n.c; Da te DIST HI CT 1 . Gris e t -¥--Battin _n_ Miller *-Porter -1L ni:sTRICT 2 Smith _j_ Christie --)L Cl ark, Robt . _ _a_ Cu l ver ~ Finne ll -¥- Herrin ~v - Just -r- Phil lips J Sims n Stephenson .:j.._ Wedaa ~ Winn .:.a_ DISTRI CT 3 I-iyde _:y__ Battin ..n_ Be r ton ..:J_ Chris tie -¥:- Cl ark, Robt . _:a_ Culver -¥.- Davis 4- Green _n_ Iiarpe-r ..¥- Harvey *-:- ·Herrin ~ Hemeon =¥-. Holde n ~- Mc Whinne y -1)_ Sims '1 Stephenson + DISTRICT 5 Parsons Caspers Hi r th ± + 6 7 Miller C l ark,R a-r-~ Quigley Gris et Porter Rogers f ;_th .•. DISTRICT 11 Shipley Baker Coen 1-+ DISTRICT 8 Boyd Caspers Mi tchell ~J~1~~ Herrin :} Caspers Coco Hileman Root Jackson Gomez Gris et Harper Caspers Zuniga Dutton Machado Schniepp Kroes en Casper s Westra Root Jackso n Fonte McCracken Just Kanel Gris et Le wis Barnes Zun iga Dutton . Co co Caspers Fischback He rrin M cCracl~e 0 Caspers_J ·Goldberg Tir~e ------Districts l,~~'3 } 5" f \l --- Re.s.. ~~~~'\.tecl .\-\~ '4 c,,te J-':2 JOI NT BOA?J)S Just Baker Battin Berton Caspers Harper ==Caspers Caspers Westra Chris tie --Root --Clark, Robt .--:Jackson Clark,Ralp n--Cas pers Coen -- Cu lver Davis . Finne ll Quigley Green Griset Harpe r Harvey Hemeon Herrin Hirth Holden Hy de Mc Innis McWhinney -Mil ler Parsons -Fonte --Gomez Fishbach --McCracken lierrin Just -Kanel --Lewis --Grise t --croul --Bogard -Kroes en --Hirth .--coco Phi llips --caspers Porter Rogers -Hirth Shiple y --M cCrack~n S i ms --zuniga Smith -Hileman ---Step henson --Dutton -Wedaa --Machado -Winn --schniepp -)(· -)(-* Mite-he ll Boyd ==Goldberg OTHE RS Harper Brown Sylvester Lewis Dunn Cl arke Sigler Crabb Carlson Finster Gallo way Hohener Hu n t Keith . Lowry° Maddox Martinson Niss on Piersa ll Ste v ens Ne etµ!g DE<.t e _&~\l'J l DI STRICT 1 Gris et Battin Mi lle r Porter nrsTRICT 2 Smith Ch r istie Clark,Rob t.-- Cu l v e r -- Finnell Herrin Just Phillips Sims Stephenson -- Wedaa Winn DISTRI CT 3 liyde Battin Berton Christie Cl ark, Ro bt ._ Culver Davis Green Har pe r Ha r vey ·He rrin He me o n Holde n Mc .Whinney Sims Stephenson DISTRI CT 5 Parsons Caspers Hirth DISTRICT 6 Porte r Caspers ·Mcinni s DI STRIC T 7 Mille r ~ Cl ark , Ralp fDL_ Quigley .!1_ Griset .:/-- Port e r ::/-- ~e1 S" J::l_ r' ;_th -t----DI STRIC T 11 Shipley Bake r Co e n DI STRICT 8 Boy d Caspers Mitche ll Herrin Caspers Coco Hi l eman Root Jackson Gome .z Gris et Harper Caspe rs Zuniga Dutton Machado Schniepp Kroes en Caspe rs West ra Ro ot Jackson Fon te McCracken Just Kane l Gris et Lewis -Ba r nes Zuniga Dutton Croul · Hirth Coco Caspers Fischback Herrin Hirth Hileman Mc Cracken Casp e rs Goldb e r g T i.J1 e --------Distri ct s _#__,__7~---- = JOI NT BOArtD S Just Bake r Battin Bert on Ca sp e r s Harper ==Caspers Ca s pers We s tra Christie Root Clark, Robt .-,Jackson Clark, Ral ph---Casp e rs Co en --- Cu l ver Davi s . Finnell Quigley Green Gris et Harper Harve y Hemeon Herrin Hirth Holden Hy de Mc Inni s Mc Wh i nney Mi ller Parsons --Fonte -Gomez Fishbac h --McCracken He rrin J us t --Ka nel -Le wis ---Griset --c rou l --Hogard --Kroesen --Hirt h -coco Phil lip s -caspe r s Po rte r Ro g ers ---Hi r t h Shipley --M cC r ack ~n Sims --z unig a Smit h --Hileman S t ep h e n son --Dutton Wedaa --Mac h ado Winr"1 ---sc h niepp * * * Mite-he ll Boyd :==Goldberg OTHERS Harper Br o~m S ylves t er L ewis Du nn Cl arke Sigler Crabb Ca r lson Fin ster Gall oway Ho h e n e r Hu n t Ke i t h . Lowry" Ma dd o x Martin.son Niss on Piersall Stevens Mect ~n~ n ,='.t e _;ti ~\ ?J, DIS'rRI C'r l Gris et Battin Miller Porter W[STR1CT 2 ----- Smith Yl Christie ~ Clark, Robt . _ _:a_ Cu l ve r n Finnell r. Herrin _n_ Just ::/-- Phillips \I · Sims -t- Stephenson ~ Wed aa ~ Winn _:o_ DISTRICT 3 eyde ::/- Battin Jl__ Be rton *- Christie +- Clark, Robt .~ Culver _a_ Davis ...:l- Green 4- HaFpe ~ +- Harvey _o_ ·Herrin 1)_ Hemeon j__ Holden ...¥-- Mc Whinney ¥:- Sims . .:f.- Stephenson .a_ Herrin Caspers Coco Hi l eman Ro ot Jackson Gome .z Griset Harpe r Caspers Zuniga Dutton Machado Schniepp Kroes en Caspers Westra Root Jacks on Fonte McCracken Just Kane l Gris et Lewis Ba rnes Zuniga Dutton Ti 1:::e = -------Dis t ri cts J "l 3 5, fo;. \\ ~) JOi l'J~ B OA?cDS -Just Baker Battin Be r ton Caspers Harpe r ==Caspers __ Casp e rs Westra Christie -Root -Clark, Ro bt .--,Jackson Clark , Ral ph-Caspers Coen - Cu l ver Davis . Finnell Quigley Green Gris e t Harpe r Harve y Hemeon --Her rin --/--Hi r th . -~-Jf~ ~~~~en __ == Mc Inn.is Mc Wh inney 71-1 '--Miller --Fonte -Gomez Fishbach --Mc Cr ac l<:en Herrin Just -Kane l --Lewis --Griset -croul --Hogar d -Kroes en -Hirt h --coco c(51-t>-¢ Parsons C?t;-<. Phillips --caspe r s i--(51 Porter --Hirth 4'-0 11.ogers · 1 .; ole y Mol"\On Passecl --Mc Cracken -z uni g a 10-s -Hileman. --1--Dut t on --Machado --sc.tm iepp . * * * DI STRICT 5 of' Cit1 C.v ,,..JJ Parsons J'.l._ • by ~iY\?.c.-\\ on C:a spers A__ Hirth J'.L. Cr oul · Mite-he ll Mot~" ~~fc'b.~d -Boyd :=Goldberg :2-0 OTHERS DISTRICT 6 Porter _!)___ Caspers _a__ Mc I nnis -0- DISTRICT 7 Miller . Clark , Ralph __ Quigley Griset. Po r ter Roge rs ;:' ;_th .•. DISTRI CT 11 Shipley Baker Coen DI STRICT 5oy d Caspers Mitchell Hirth} Coco Caspers Fischbac Herrin Hirth Hileman M cCracke ~ Casper s ) ·Goldberg Mot'c"' ~fe~\e.c.l ~-0 Oe.f"~r""~ d -\'o P~'o· ':l q~.h acl;. 'f"'\-9. Harper Brovm Sylvester Lewis Dunn -- Clarke Sigler -- Crabb Carlson F'inste r Gall oway Hohener Hunt Keith Lowry Maddox Martin.son Niss on Piersall Stevens !·1ee t~.nG D~~te DISTP.ICT 1 Gris e t -£_ Battin Mill er .IL Porter -T- HIST RI CT 2 Sm j_ th :i.. Christie L Clark, Robt. ~_g_ Cu l ver \J ~l~1~2 Herrin Caspers Coco Hileman Root Jackson Finnell L_ Gomez Herrin J_y__ Griset Just -;Jr ~ Harp e r Phillips r.;-t Caspers Sims Zuniga Step hensonk Dutton Wedaa Machado Winn . Schniepp \Y\ DISTRICT 3 ~n K roesen Battin ..Q_ Berton \J Christie °"!I_ Clark, Robt . _a_ Culver -:/-- Davis -t- Green b- }ol&i r p 1i • !.J__ Harvey tl__ ·He rrin \I He meon ~ Holde n ...¥.---- Mc Whinney t:- Sims . . Stephenson '-f- DISTRICT 5 15 arsons Caspers Hirth ~'la'._ -¥-- DISTRICT 6 .Porte r Caspers . Mcinnis 31= -1- DISTRICT 7 Miller • \l _ . Clark,R alp ~ Quigley Q!__ Griset -/;;- Porter ~ :Hoge ~ ....1L_ p ;_th 2¥=' ·' DI STRICT Shipley Baker Coen DISTRICT Bo y Ci Caspers Mitche ll 11 J f- 8 Caspers Wes tra Root J ackson Fonte McCracken Just Kanel Gris et Lewis Barnes Zuniga Dutton . Croul j Hi rt h} Coco Caspers Fischback He rrin Hirt h Hileman McCrackeJ Caspers Go ldberg T~:e ~ C:.h o\'\je> r b-0 -ff\ O'i to n 'PGs 'e.a 3-l -~ o'\\oV\ ?o&s~ \\-0 ~o1\cn ?a.s.se.4 l-0 Distric t s 11 :2 1 3 ,5 1 b ,? 4--J/ • r ; :v > JOI NT B OA ?..DS --Just Baker Battin Berton Caspers Harper ==Ca spers __ Caspers Westra Christie -Root Clark, Robt .--Jackson Clark, Ralpn--Caspers Coen -- Culver Davis . Finne l l Qui g ley dreen Gris et Harper .Harve y Hemeon Herrin Hirth Holden Hy de Mc Innis Mc Wh in.n.e y Miller Parsons --Fonte -Gomez Fishbach --McCracken Herrin Just -Kane l --Lewis -Griset -c rou l --Hogard -Kroes en --Hirth --coco P h i l lips -caspers Porter Rogers --Hirth Ship le y -McCracken Sims --zuniga Sm ith --Hi l eman st·ephenson --Dutton We daa --Ma c h ado Winn Ll OT fill RS Harper Brown Sylvester Lewis Dunn Clarke Sigler Crabb Carlson F inster Galloway Ho hener Hunt Keith Lowry' Maddox Martin.son Niss on Piersall Stevens --sc h.i1iepp ==Goldberg t,ieet1~nG D·:.-.t e DISTRICT 1 Gris et (I Battin .:f.-Mi l l e r Porte r -+-t- n1STR1CT 2 Sm ith '('\ _ Christie .n_ Clark, Ro bt . _a_ Culve r ~ Finnell ·v- Herrin v Just rv- Phi llips ;:t- Sims -M-- Stephenson 1 Wedaa Winn {-- DIST RICT 3 Hyde h-- Battin :_;/.._ Be rton ~ Christie ~ Clark, Robt . _a_ Culve r t Davis 7:¥- Green '>f.;-- He,Iper t Harvey ·Herrin Jjl_ Hemeon V- Holden ~- Mc Wh inney _!L S i ms _n_ Step henson 1- DISTRICT 5 Par sons Caspers Hir th DISTRICT Porter Caspers . Mcinnis fK= ..!L 6 x + DISTRI CT 7 Mil l er '.:/-, Cl ark ,Ralp f4_ Quigley .a_ Griset n Porter 1 "Hog oo4?£ _:.n... C' i_ t h _Q__ ... DISTRI CT 1 1 y~ Shipl e y Baker Coen + DISTRICT 8 Boyd Caspers Mitchell ;\l ~l 2a T i 1.::.e ------·District s i :<;3 1 5 > b; ~ 4 ll He rrin Caspers Coco Hileman Root Jackson Gomez Gris et Harp er Caspers Zuniga Dutton Machado Schniepp Kroes en Caspers Westra Ro ot Jack son Fonte McCracken Just Kanel Gris e t Lewi s Barnes Zuniga Dutton Co co Caspers Fischback Herrin Hirth Hileman ---- Md\\on Passe<.\ 3-1 Mot\O\\ Pa.sse.Q. l\ ... ~ Ma\\ O't\ f-a,\\ect \-\e. v o1e \-\ Mo t\oY\ 'P~.se1 2-0 McCracke:t. Caspers ) Goldberg J OIJIJ"T BOAr.D S Just Baker Battin Berton Casper s Harper ==Caspe r s Cas pers Westra Chris tie --Roo t Cl a rk, Robt .-,Jackson Clark, Ralp li--Caspers Coen - Cu l ver Davis . Finnell Quigley Green Gri s et Harper Harvey Hemeon Herrin Hirth Holden Hyde Mc Innis .McWh inney Mille r -Fonte -Gome z Fishbach -McCracke n Herrin Just -Ka nel --Lewis --Griset -croul --Hoga rd -Kroes en --Hirth --c oco -caspers --Hirth --Mc Crac ken --zuni g a -Hileman nson --Dutton --Machado --sc ti.niepp . * * -)(- Mite.he ll Boyd ==Goldberg OTHERS Harper Brown Sylveste r Lewis Dunn Clarke Sigle r Crabb Carl son F inster Galloway Hohener Hunt Keith Lo wry' Maddox Martin.son Niss on Piers a ll Stevens Chairman Just Report of the Joint Chairman Present Certificate of Completion.to Terrence L. Williams who has satisfactorily completed the prescribed two year training curriculum for Apprentice I in the field of waste water quality control with a minimwn of three months of study and application in each of the following: Plant Maintenance, Collection Facilities Maintenance, Mechanical Maintenance, Electrical Maintenance, Treatment Plant Operations, Laboratory Procedures and General Engineering Practices. Terrence began as an.apprentice ·in October, 1970, and will now go to the Engineering Department as an Apprentice II. Call meetin·g of Executive Committee for 5:30 p.m., Tuesday, February 29th. Invite Directors Phillips and Clark. .: RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS February 9, 1972 -7:30 p.m. J>·. -·;.,:.:. .. ..;, WARRANT NO. 17209 17210 ~211 .. 212 17213 17214 17215 17216 17217 17218 17219 17220 17221 17222 17223 17224 17225 17226 17227 17228 17229 17230 17231 17232 17233 17234 17235 17236 17237 17238 17239 17240 17241 17242 17243 17244 17245 17246 17247 17248 17249 17250 17251 17252 17253 17254 17255 17256 17257 17258 17259 ~260 . 261 17262 17263 17264 17265 17266 17267 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF A-1 Tool Rebuilders, Inc., Equipment Repair $ AoB.C. Lumber Co., Building Materials A B C School Equipment, Message Board AMI Adept Mfg., Inc., Pump Parts Allied Bolt & Supply Co., Hardware Hilary J. Allison, Employee Mileage Almquist Tool & Equipment Co., Hand Tools Ameron, Protective Coating Anaheim Builders Supply, Inc., Building Materials Anaheim Dodge, Truck Parts The Anchor Pacl-cing Co., Pump Packing Appliance Refinishing Co., Refinish Equipment .Applied Sctence Laboratories, Inc., Lab Supplies Aqua Design Co., Ecological Research Supplies Beacon Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Bearing Specialty Co., Pump Parts Bell's Radiator Service, Tank Repair Bessen & Associates, Freight-in Black & Decker, Tool Repair Bomar Enterprises, Building Materials Bomar Magneto Service, Inco, Magneto Parts & Repairs Bristol Park Medical Group, Pre~employrnent Exams Charles Bruning Co., Hand Tools Cal State Seal Coo, Pump Parts Certified Laboratories, Cleanin6 Supplies Chevron Asphalt Co., Protective Coating Brian Chuchua's, Truck Parts Coast Industrial Supply Co., Hardware Coast Insurance Agency, Fire Insurance Premium College Lumber, Building Materials & Supplies Consolidated Elect. Dist., Electrical Supplies Constructors Supply Co., Hand Tools Control Specialists, Inco, Regulator Parts Paul A. Cooper, Grit Hauling Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc o, Truck Parts County of Orange, Printing Mro Crane, Equipment Rental Crown Controls, Inc., Meter Repair Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage Curtin Scientific Co., Lab Supplies De Guelle & Sons Glass Co., Truck Repair Del Chemical Corpo, Chemicals Denny's Refrigeration & Heating, Furnace Units Diamond Core Drilling, Core Drilling Eastman, Inco, Office Supplies & Forms Electric Machinery Mfg. Coo, Electrical Parts Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research&. Internal Inspection of Outfall Engineers Sales Service Co., Inc., Pump Parts Ensign Products Coo, Protective Coating Enterprise Printing Co., Printing Fischer & Porter Co., Chlorinator Parts & Instrumentation Fisher Controls Coo, Regulator Parts William H. Fox, Employee Mileage Freeway Machine & Welding Shop, Machining City of Fullerton, Water General Electric Supply Co., Electrical Supplies General Telephone Coo Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine Golden West Fertilizer Coo, Grit Hauling A-1 AMOUNT 126.18 lJ.40 41073 288075 234.97 32070 34044 638. 70 53.82 42.00 121.42 63.50 104035 105.08 44.81 282012 7.5'J 122.22 9o94 18008 335.95 2?,.08 9q.08 58 .32 126.92 154.58 40.16 19.55 5,258.00 472.0J 566 .17 504.16 232.lJ 600.0J 656. 21~ 7.18 225 .15 38.59 86.82 7o08 22.45 63.72 1,172.00 35000 1,095.58 66.92 3,240000 1,047059 315.00 207080 2,028047 380078 25.62 1,761.60 5.82 1, 295 .95 1,815.34 4,lW5ol5 384.oo WARRANT NO. 17268 17269 17270 17271 ~72 . 273 17274 17275 17276 17277 17278 17279 17280 17281 17282 17283 17284 17285 17286 17287 17288 17289 17290 17291 17292 17293 17294 17295 17296 17297 17298 i7299 17300 17301 17302 17303 17304 17305 17306 17307 17308 17309 17310 17311 17312 17313 17314 17315 17316 17317 17318 17319 17320 17321 ~322 323 17324 17325 17326 17327 17328 17329 IN FAVOR OF W.W. Grainger, Inc., Electrical Supplies Monte Greinet, Employee Mileage Hanson, Peter3on, Cowles & Sylve3ter, Audit Service3 Harman Pump Co., Pump Parts Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting & COD Expenses Hercules, Inc., Test Materials Hi-Fi Banner Coo, Safety SignR Honeywell, Inc., Instrumentation Howard Supply Co., Pipe Supplies City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Beach Equip. Rental, Equipment Rental I W C -Industrial Water Conditioning, Water International Harvester Co., Truck Parts J & M Service, Engine Parts Edward E. Just, CSSDA Conference Reimbursement KAR Products, Inc., Hardware Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies G.L. Kellar, Inc., Redhill Subsidence Repair Kelly Pipe Co., Pipe Supplies King Bearing, Inc., Bearings S.P. Kinney Engineers, Inc., Equipment Rental Kleen Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Service Lacal Company, Inc., Pump Packing Judy Lee, Employee Mileage James E. Lenihan Co., Disto 7 Subsid. Repair (MO 8-24-71) Lewis Bros. Battery, Truck Parts R.W. Mc Clellan & Sons, Inc., Building Materials Manufacturing Chemists, Test Materials Matheson Scientific, Lab Supplies & Test Materials Mesa Supply, Truck Parts Mine Safety Appliances Co., Test Materials Glenn Mitchell Manuals, Inc., Auto Repair Manual. Modern Pipe & Supply, Valves Herbert Ao Moss, Special Labor Counsel NCR Systemedia Division, Printing National Chemsearch Corp., Solvents Newark Electronics, Electrical Supplies City of Newport Beach, Water C. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel Retainer & Services OD.i'.\ Nursery, Landscaping Supplies Orange County Chemical Co., Chemicals Orange County Radiotelephone Service Orange County Stamp Coo, Office Supplies Oreo Block Co., Inc., Building Materials Pacific Clay Products, Pipe Pacific Telephone John R. Palen, Employee Mileage Gregg T. Pamson, Employee Mileage Ron Parker, Employee Mileage Parker Supply Co., Gauges MoCo Patten & Co., Inc., Engine Parts John J. Phillips, Employee Mileage Postmaster, Postage Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage The Pryor Giggey Co., Building Materials Pyramid Fence Coo, Building Materials Steve Po Rados, Inc., Right-of-way Maintenance Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Service Red's Frame Wheel & Brake Service, Truck Repair A-2 AMOUNT 45020 34002 1,761.0J 141.57 181.08 85.58 17033 1,805.15 1,376.91 7 ~~ ·~~ 12.60 80o00 109.75 388.87 136.66 40.61 759. 00 400.00 444.64 1,736.35 253.80 419.23 102.85 1,124.35 1,823.99 36.95 24.06 7,452.93 20.95 52.50 23.76 318. 01.i 92.82 214.21 43.48 335.51 250.00 387. 53 354.11 60.03 10.35 729.82 20048 10087 172076 5o31 66.18 26 .30 267.67 106.86 14025 112032 26002 3·J 0 71 75018 300o0J 69078 244024 26016 400000 150000 14040 WARRANT NO. 17330 17331 17332 17333 ~334 J. (335 17336 17337 17338 17339 17340 17341 17342 17343 17344 17345 17346 17347 17348 17349 17350 17351 17352 17353 17354 17355 17356 17357 17358 17359 17360 17361 17362 17363 17364 17365 17366 17367 17368 17369 17370 17371 17372 17373 17374 IN FAVOR OB1 Robbins & Myers, Inc., Bearings $ San Bar Aquarium Produ6t£, Inc., Research Supplies Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Rewind Santa Ana Tent & Awning Co., Tarpaulins Sargent Welch Scientific Coo, Lab Supplies Scientific Products, Lab Supplies S.F. Serrantino, Employee Mileage The Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies A.H. Shipkey, Inc., Truck Tires & Parts Smith Bros. Co., Fabricating South Orange Supply, Pipe Supplies Southern Calif. Edison Co. Southern Calif. Gas Co. ·Southern Calif. Wat~r Co. Southwest Flexible, Equipment Parts Sparkletts, Bottled Water Speed-E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Oil Co. of Calif., Engine Oil & Gasoline Starow Steel, Steel Stock J. Wayne Sylvester, CSSDA Conference Reimbursement Taylor-Dunn, Truck Parts C.O. Thompson Petroleum Co., Kerosene Tiernan' s Office Equipment, Eq\.l:!.:_Jment Repair Harry L. Twining, Employee Mileage J.Go Tucker & Son, Ir..c., Blower United Technology Center, Lubricants Union Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline Valvate Associates, Valves Vaniman Camera, Photo Supplies & Processing Vireo Mfg. Corp., Operating Supplies John R. Waples R.S., Odor Consultant Warren & Bailey Co., Inc., Hardware Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc., Engine Parts Westinghouse Electric Corp., Electrical Cart Motor Westinghouse Electric Supply Co., Electrical Supplies Willig Equipment Co., Wheel Loader Parts Wilson Engine & Equipment Coo, Engine Parts Russ Wold, Employee Mileage World Travel Bureau, Inc., SWRCB Meetings Don Wright, Employee Mileage Xerox Corp., Reproduction Service Zodiac Paper Co., Reproduction Supplies Parker Diving Service, Outfall #2 Inspection (MO 1-12-72) Bernard T. Redican, Employee Mileage TOTAL JOINT OPERATING $ A-3 AMOUNT 48.12 117.15 162.06 851.60 37080 281.40 253052 42.66 383036 285. 51 39 .90 11.25 24,149.48 863.96 2.94 27.75 32.35 661.08 1,553.49 1,331.92 64.5e> 7.41 128$58 32.63 17.10 277.75 13.18 37.35 357.57 27.68 25.44 210o7C> 268.05 79.80 259.25 57023 llo28 89004 57006 170048 102042 787.50 38046 4,850.00 90.60 96,18L~.46 WARRANT NO. 17375 17376 ;.Jil..377 -. 378 17379 17380 17381 17382 17383 17384 17385 17386 17387 17388 17389 17390 17391 17392 17393 17394 17395 17396 17397 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF John Carollo Engineers, Engineering_-. Plant Constr. $ Carollo & Keith, Survey I-8 County of Orange, Testing I-8 ETI & Kordick, Contractor P2-ll-l William P. Ficker, AIA, Architect J-13 Fletcher Jones Chevrolet, New Trucks Freeman Electric Const. Co., Contractor Pl-6-1 Gauge Repair Service, Instrumentation General Electric Supply Co., Release Retention Pl-6-lA J. Putnam Henck, Contractor P2-17 J.E. Hoagland & W.Wo Hoagland, Contractor P2-19 Louis R. Hovater, Engineering Feasibility Study International Business Machines Corp., Office Equipm2nt J & T Equipment, Scaffolding Kordick & Rados, Contractor I-8 B.H. Miller Construction Co., Contractor J7-2 & J-12 Motorola, Inc., Mobile Radios Oilfield Electric Co., Facility Relocation I-8 Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Pipe Insp. &·Testing I-8 Security Title Insurance Coo, Title Guarantee I-8 Healy Tibbitts Construction, Contractor I-7-3 Twining Laboratories, Testing P2-ll-l, J-12, P2-19 F.T. Ziebarth Co., Inc., Contr. Pl-3-1, Pl~lR-l/P2-lR-l AMOUNT "'9 "1'01"" 8""' c. ' C.'-t • _j 3,703.00 12.88 39,225.60 4,485.00 14,733.29 18, 363.13 295.11 12,294045 82,987.69 201,754.92 2,200o0J 612.36 679.10 361,297.71 57,923.10 17, 563. 35 2,566.92 1,100.00 15.00 19,234.53 103.70 37' 353 .93 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING $ 907,751.60 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF $1,003,936.06 A-4 'lARRANT NO. L7~ 17~ ) l7400 l7401 17402 l7403 L7404 17405 174~ DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMUL.L\TED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Lowry and Associates,Engineering 2-14 Security Title Insurance Co., Title guarantee 2-14 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Er.gineering 3-18 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-16 Merco Construction Engineers, Contractor 3-16 DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering 3-17 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Shuirman-Simpson, Engineering Services City of Nei,vport Beach, December connection Administration DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Shuirman-Simpson, Engineering 5-19 -B- $ AMOUNT 10,585.50 580.00 $ 11,165.50 $ 10,465.00 687.29 12,203.53 $ 23,355.82 $ 5,732.50 $ 1,462.75 124.oo $ 1,586.75 $ 12,282.50 WARRANT NO. 1'~)6 17408 17409 17410 17411 17412 17413 17414 _ 17415 17416 17417 17418 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering 7-5-lR I CONSTRUCTION FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF AT & SF Rail·way Co., License Agreement 7-6-4 Boyle Engineering, Survey 7-6-4 Northern Contracting Co., Contractor 7-6-4 Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Pipe Testing 7-6-3 and 7-6-4 DISTRICTS NOS. 1 & 7 SUSPENSE FUND WARHANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Survey 1-12 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 7-6-1, 7-6-2, and 1-12 Mike Masanovich Const. Co., Inc., Contractor 1-12 Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Pipe Testing 7-6-1 Ernest E. Pestana, Inc., Contractor 7-6-2 Sully Miller Contracting Co., Contractor 7-6-1 Twining Laboratories, Concrete Testing 7-6-2 -C- AMOUNT $ 1,109.83 $ 3,164.oo $ $ $ 150.00 554.50 2,502.22 5,096.88 8,303.60 12,577.43 723.25 1,713.53 116,584.20 100.00 50,690.00 53,509.62 13.90 $223,334.50 RESOLUTION NO. 72-11 AME1\1DING RESOLUTION NO:: 64-3. AS AMENDED A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOSo 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NOo 64-3 (RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR MEETINGS), AS AMENDED * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Resolution No. 64-:-3, as amended, is hereby further amended by the addition of a section entitled "Section 180 ATTENDANCE DEFINEDo 11 , as follows: 11 18. ATTENDANCE DEFINED. The Director or alternate Director in answering roll call as present for the District at any District meeting shall be considered as having attended if he is present during the time the business is being conducted by the Board of Directors. The late arrival or early departure from a District meeting by a Director or alternate participating, unless excused for good cause by the presiding officer of the meeting (District Chairman or Joint Chairman of a Joint Meeting) shall be considered as 11 non-attendance" and no compensation shall be paid such Director or alternate for such limited appearance at a meeting. Arrivals and departures of Directors and alternates shall be noted in the Minutes and all excuses granted shall be similarly noted. Any Director or alternate wishing to appeal the ruling of the Chairman may do so by obtaining a vote of the other Directors and alternates present and such vote shall be determinative as to whether or not II compensation shall be paid. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 9 9 1972. Agenda Item #9a -D-All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 72-12 ACCEPTING PROPOSAL OF HANSON,; PETERSON 2 COWLES AND SYLVESTER A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COU1-J"IJ1Y SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPrING PROPOSAL AND AUTHORIZING Er.1PLOYMENT OF HANSON, PETERSON, COWLES AND SYLVESTER, CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Hanson, Peterson, Cowles and Sylvester, Certified Public Accountants, be employed by the Joint Admin:istrative Organization of the County Sanitation Districts, in accordance with their proposal dated January 18, 1972; and, Section 2. That said Accountants are hereby employed to perfonn the following services: (1) To audit all funds and to prepare annual audited financial report which will include an opinion; and, to make quarterly financial reports showing Joint Operating Fund Operations and an All Funds Schedule of Cash and Investments in Securities without an audit opinion as audit tests made at quarterly intervals may not be sufficient to render such an opinion. (2) To review at the request of the General Manager, Joint Administrative Chairman or any District Board the present accounting system used by the Districts comprising the Joint Administrative Organization and to make recommendations for changes where desirable from time to +· vlme. (3) To consult and advise the management and Directors in connection with accounting methods and matters at any time. (4) To do such other accounting work including the preparation of special audits or statistical reports as they Agenda Item #9b E-1 All Districts may be requested to do by the Joint Administrative Organization or any District of the Joint Administrative Organization. Section 3. In performing the above-named services, the following shall be the maximum charges to be paid: Section 2, Item (1) $5,900 per year Section 2, Items (2),(3), and (4) No Maximum Amount All work to be done by said Accountants for the Joint Administrative Organization, or any individual District member thereof, shall be paid for at the rate of $136 per day for principal accountants, $108 per day for senior accountants, and $80 per day for junior accountants and assistants, subject to the above-stated maxlinums. A day shall be eight (8) hours. Section 4. That said Accountants shall render itemized fee statements on a progress basis, using per diem rates for services rendered. Section 5. That payment for said services rendered to the Joint Administrative Organization shall be made from the Joint Operating Fund, and that services rendered to any District shall be made from the appropriate fund of that District. Section 6. That Resolution No. 70-169, adopted December 9, 1970, is hereby rescinded and made of no further effect. Agenda Item #9b E-2 AJ_l Districts COUNTY SAIHTr;TIOH DISTRICTS OF ORA!rGE CO'JNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 -10844 Ellis Ave~ue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C • 0 • NO • __ l _(..__F_..i ..... n-=a-=-1..-.) __ CONTRACTOR: Freeman Electric Construction Co. DATE: February 9, 1972 JOB : ___ P_O_W_E_R_R_E_L_IA_B_I_L_I_T_Y_P_R_O_JE_C_T_A_T_R_E_c_L_Ar--_rn_T_r_o_N_P_L_rf}_N_T_N_. o_. _1_,_J_O_B_N_o_. _P_l_-_6_-_1 ~ Amount of this change order (ADD) QDBDUOlX) $ 7 2 977. 88 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. · Reference: Contractor's Correspondence Dated 8/24/71; 11/2/71; 12/30/71; 1/5/72 District's Correspondence Dated 10/4/71; 1/3/72; 1/5/72; 1/7/72 Drawing E-1 ADD Relocate 12 kv manhole #1 to avoid undisclosed .~ concrete duct bank and pave extra excavation ADD Extend 480 volt 12 conduit duct bank to supply shops, warehouse and future power demands ADD TOTAL ADD For delays due to. Teamsters strike and picketing the contract time shall be extended For delays due to inclement weather the cont~act time shall be extended · For the above added and revi~ed work the contract· time shall be extende~ SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this CO Total Time Extension on Contract Time Revised Completion Date Board authorization date: TOTAL TIME EXTENSION July 29, 1971 105 calendar days November 11, 1971 81 cal~ndar days 81 calendar days January 31, 1972 Original Contr~ct Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD)(DEDUCT) Amended Contract Price Approved: $ 489.88 7,488.oo $1,977.88 21 calendar days 20 calendar days 40 calendar days 81 calendar days $155, 320. 00 $ ___ 0 ............ 0 ___ 0 __ $ 7, 977. 88 $ 163) 297. 88 February 9, 1972 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS or Orange County, California . ~ . By ____ ~/...._s/...._P_a_u_l~G __ ._B_r_o_w_n~~--~--- Chief Engineer JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FREEMAN ELECTRIC'CONSTRUCTION CO. ·By --------------~------------------By ____ ~----------~--------~~----- Agenda Item lOa -F-All Districts RESOLUTION N0.72-13 ACCEPTING JOB NO. Pl-6-1 AS COMPLETE ) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRE.CTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOSo 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NOo Pl-6-1 AS COMPLETE * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and ii, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, FREEMAN ELECTRIC CONSTUCTION CO., has completed the construction in accordance with the tenns of the contract for POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT. AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. Pl-6-1, on the 31st. day of January, 1972; and, Section 2o That by letter Districts' engineers have recommended acceptance of said '\vork as having been completed in accordance with the tenns of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said engineers' recommendation, which said recommendation is ~ereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the Boards hereby accept as complete, in accordance with the tenns of the contract therefor dated July 29, 1971, POWER RELIABILITY PROJECT AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. Pl-6-1; and, Section 5o That the Chainnan of District No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor. PASSED AND ADOPTED a,t a regular meeting held February 9, 1972. , Agenda Item #lOb -G-All Districts PHOENIX ARIZONA JOHN A. CAROLLO. P.E.(1906·1971) H. HARV[ Y HUNT. P. E. HOWARD M. WAY. P. E. ROBERT G. WILLIAMS. P. E. DONALD R. PREISLER. P. E. Boards of Directors CAL~OLLO LAFAYETTE CALIFORNIA County Sanitation Districts 1, 2, 3 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange Com1ty 10844 Ellis Avenue P. Oo Box 5175 F.ountain Valley, California 92708 SANTA ANA CALIFORNIA Subject: Ocean Outfall No. 2 -Marine Section Job No. J -10 Gentlemen: EL PASO TEXAS 3690 MT. DIABLO BOULEVARD LAFAYETTE, CALIF. 94549 AREA CODE: (415) 283-3895 January 27, 1972 At your January 12 Board Meeting, you authorized the internal inspection of a portion of the ocean outfall. This work has now been completed. The inspection verified that the joints under consid.eration had not moved and we, therefore, consider this section of the pipeline to be stabilized. · Complete and detailed reports of the inspection are being submitted to your staff by the divers and our inspector. Very truly yours, JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS HHH:kp ·Agenda Item #lOc .:..H-J\.11 Districts M E M 0 R A N D U M ---------- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE Cou~HY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8 I 27 10844 ELLIS AVWUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY! ~ALIFOKNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-24.l 1 January 26, 1972 TO: J. Wayne Sylvester FROM: Ray E. Lewis SUBJECT: Relocation of Power Poles by Standard Oil Company to Accommodate Construction of the Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8 During the preparation of the plnns for the Interplant Influent Interceptor it was apparent that one of the power poles owned by the Standard.·Oil Company had to be relocated to avoid the cons true ti on of this 96 '' trunk sewer. The initial contact with the Standard Oil Company indicated that the cost for relocation would be less than $400 and a request for a purchase order was signed by me to have the work per·formed. During the relocation of this pole it \'JaS noted by an official of the State Industrial Safety Committee that the 440 volt power line \".'OUld align itself directly over one of the pumping wells of Standard 011 and would be in violation of the State S2fety Code. To relocate their pole system and to comply with the State Safety requirements it was necessary to set four new poles and remove five existing poles and transfer the 440 volt power line to a new pole location. The final cost for the work done to accommodate the r-8 construction is $2,566.92. I here- by recommend that this amount be paid to the Standard Oil Company in accordance with the invoice attached herev1i th. A ttachrnents /lm Agenda Item #lOe i. -I-A11 Distric·ts TO: FROM: January 28, 1972 M E M 0 R A N D U M ========== Fred A. Harper General Manager Wm. Clarke Maintenance Superintendent COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. 80X 8127 10844 ELLIS AVE!'~UE FOUNTAIN VALLEY. <;ALIFOKNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 SUBJECT: Recirculation Pump Conversion re Contra.ct No. Pl-9-1 At the request of our design engineers, John Carollo Eneineers, we propose to convert an existing 24 MS Johnson mixed flow effluent·pwnp to meet a new set of conditions which will exist during and upon completion of Contra.ct No. Pl-9-1, Expansion of Secondary Treatment Facilities at Plant No. 1. The conversion consists of: (1) (2) (3) a new impeller sized for 13,900 gallons per minute at 18 feet TDH a new 75 hp 5.85 rpm electric motor new shafting and moto~ mounting. This conversion work will be done by or under the direct supervision of the Johnson PQmp Company with the Districts' forces during the removal and reinstallation. The scheduling of this .conversion is critical to the project and should be accomplished prior to the contract work to insure the uninterrupted operation of the secondary treatment works at Treatment Plant No. 1. Estimated conversion costs -$9,500; estimated new pwnp costs would be $15,900. ' · It is requested that we gain Board authority to proceed with the project in an amount not to exceed $10,000. WC:gc Agenda Item #iOf -J-All Districts February 1, 1972 TO: FROM: MEVIORANDUM Mr. Paul G. Brm·m Chief Engineer Mr. W. N. Clarke Maintenance Superintendent COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFOimlA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92703 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 SUBJECT: Replacement Pu."T1p Parts for 30-inch Fairbanks-Morse Raw Sewage Pumps The Districts' supply of spare impellers, wearing rings and £haft sleeves for these pu.lllps has been depleted. There are six of the units in service and we have scheduled overhaul for two of them during this fiscal year. We have obtained quotes from a Fairbanks-Morse suppller as noted below·: Item No. 1 2 Quan. 1 1 Set Description Impeller -SAE 63 Bronze 30-3/4 11 difu"neter Wearing Rings, Stainless Steel, AISI Type 410 300 Brinell Hardness Stang Co. $7,750.00 1,530.00 The Districts own a set of impeller and wearing ring patterns and have received quotes from a local foundry to machine to finished size. Item No. guan. Description Price 1 1 Impeller -SAE 63 $2,340.00 2 1 Wearing Rings 11-13 Set Chrome Alloy 744.oo Agenda Item #lOg K-1 All Districts SUBJECT: Replacement Pump Parts for 30-inch. Fairbanks-Horse Raw Sewage Pumps February 1, 1972 Page 2 Comparing the fie;urcs belo~·r, it is evident tha.t a substantial savings will be effected by proceeding with the manufacture of these impellers and wearing rings locally. Factory Item Parts Local No. Quan. Description Lm·T Bid Nfg. 1 1 Impeller, 30-3/4 If diameter $7,750.00 $2,340.00 2 1 set Wearing Rin~s $1,530.00 $ 741+. 00 It is therefore requested that we obtain authorization to purchase the following items: Item Estimated No. Quan. Description Unit. Cost Total - l 2 ea. Impellers $2,340.00 $4,680.00 2 6 sets Wearing .Rings 744.oo 4~464.oo ~9l144.oo Allowing for incidentals and possible price change for material, it would seem wise to request a maximum limit of $10,000. ~tzelevi1~ W. N. Clarke Maintenance Superintendent A~enda Item #lOg K-2 All Districts RESOLU:I.1ION NO •. 72-14-1 _FEDERAL AND STATE GRAETS -1971-72 JOINT WORKS IMPHOVE1·1ENTS AND ADDITIONS A RESOLUTION OF ,.fiIB BOAHD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANI'I'ATION DIS'I1RICT NO. 1 OF OR~i'JGE COUN'I1Y, CALIFOHNIA, AlYfHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL GRANT UNDEH 33 U.S. C., 1166 ET SEQ., AND STATE GRAN1r UNDER CLEAN WNl1ER BOND LAW OF 1970, IN BEHALF OF COUNTY SANrl1ATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, · 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDi'~R THAT: Section 1. An Act of Congress knm·m as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 466 et seq.) provides for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 2. The State Clean Water Bond Law of 1970 authorizes the State Hater Resources Control Board to enter into contracts ·with public agencies for State granta for constructi6n of sewage treatment works. Section 3. County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange ColLnty, is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk se~·rer system for the collection of sewage froi;i the cities and other local ~ collection sewering agencies, and has joined with other G~unty Sani- tation District~ namely County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 in constructing, ·operating and maintaining joint sewage ·treatment plants and disposal facilities under an agreement dated July 1, 1970, as amended, k.no· .. m as the Joint Ownership, Operation ~ and Construction Agreement. Section 4. In accordance with the terms or· said Joint o~mership, Operation and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District No .. 1, of Orange County, acts· for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Agenda Item #lOh L-1 All Districts Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Oranec County, California, each ·organiz~d. for similar purposes and serving different territories, all in Orange County, California, for the purpose of constructing and operating said joint sewage treatment plants. an~ disposal facilities. Section 5. By means of this resolution and of the resolbtions set forth below by number, the following County Sanitation Districts of . Orange County, California, have authorized the filing of applications for grants under said Act of Congress and said Clean Hater Bond Law and have designated County Sanitation District No. 1 as "central Agency" for said applications as set forth in the California Administrative Code: District No. 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 Resolution No. Section 6. The General Manager is hereby authorized to prepare, sign and submit for County Sanitation District No. 1, for itself and as agent.for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, ·6, 7, and 11, all documents necessary to apply for and accept construction grants under said Act of Congress and said Clean Water Bond Law for a joint project generally.described as: 1971-72 Joint Works Improvements and Additions Agenda Item #lOh L-2 All Districts COUHTY S . .;HIT:'\TION DIST?ICTS OF ORt\NGZ COUNTY P. O. BOX 812~( -10844 Ellis A venue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C .O. NO• ----------- CONTRACTOR: E.T.I. and Kordick., A .Iojnt Venture DATE: February 9, 1972 JOB: HEADWORKS "c" EXPANSION AT PLAN'r NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-ll-l Amount of this change order (ADD) (:IDEillXCfR) $ __ 6 ___ , 7 __ 4_4_. _oo __ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or c~ntract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Districts' correspondence dated Jan. 6, 1972. ADD Contractor's correspondence dated Oct. 30, 1971, Nov. 5, 1971, Nov. 8, 1971, Nov. 30, 1971, Dec.2, 1971, Dec. 11, 1971, Jan. 5, 1972, Jan. 6, 1972, Jan. 6, 1972. Undisclosed concrete "dead men", debris and steel rods were encountered belovJ ground in the area requiring sheet piling. The Contractor vJas directed to provide the necessary labor and materials to repair or replace damaged sheeting, remove the debris and reinstall sheet piles to protect the meter vault construction. Add Add Add grit drawoff resilient faced plug valve. Remove existing cofferdam and extra steel bulkhead at influent to headworks. Add TOTAL ADD EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME Due to the requirements of the extra work indicated above the Contractor is hereby granted an extension of contract time of 21 calendar days. SUMMARY: $ 6,282.00 $ 181. 00 $ __ 2_8_1._0_0 $ 6,744.oo Original Contract Date Original Contract Completion Time Original Completion Date Time Extension This Change Order Total Extension of Coptract Time Revised Contract Completion Date October 15, 1971 450 calendar days January 7, 1973 21 calendar days 21 calendar days January 28, 1973 ~Board authorization date: February 9, 1972 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS Original Contract Price $ J I 228 , 0QQ. 0Q Prev. Auth. Changes $ ___ -~o~-- This Change (ADD)(~mi~~) $ __ 6.....,;i ........ 1 ...... Ll_4 ....... O_...O...___ Amended Contract Price $1.234.744.oo Approved: COUNTY SArlITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer E.T.I. AND KORDICK, A JOINT VENTURE By~---~--------~-------------------By--------------------~~----------- Ag end a Item #lOi -M-All Districts co m~TY s .. ~\ iiI':':~ .. rrrc:; DI~TRIC~ s C? c ?~.; r;G E COlI'.;'TY p. 0. BOX 8121' -106h11 =-~ 11 is A ·1e!:Ue Fountain Vnlley, Califorr.ia 92708 CHAI~GE ORDER C.O. NO. 4 --------- CONTRACTOR: Merco Cons true ti on Engineers, Inc. DATE: February 9, 1972 TQB: BEACH RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, REACHES 17, 18 & 19, CONTRACT NO. 3-16 Amount of this change order (ADD) (LED~~ $ __ 1_, 1_3_7_. 5_0 __ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract \'JOrk are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. .....,, REFERENCE: Contractor's invoice to the District dated January 17, 1972. The Contractor 1·1as directed to completely remove and replace the existing manhole base at Station 76+32.60. The existing manhole \·ms found to be substandard and the additions to this manhole could not be accomplinhed as required in the plans. This work was done for an additional cost of $1,137.50. ADD TOTAL ADD Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. ChangesC .O .f/1,2, & 3 adds This Change (A DD) ( ~~W~1:t) Amended Contract Price $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,137.50 1,137.50 453,122.15 2,976.10 1,137.50 457,235075 Board authorization date: Approved: February 9, 1972 Agenda Item #24 -N- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engir:eer MERCO CONSTRUCTJ:Oij ~~GINEERS District 3 CulTiiTY SAlHT!~Trmr DISTRICTS OF oRJ~rmE COU:';TY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Califorr.ia 92708 CHANGE ORDER . C.O. NO·--~~--~---~ CONTRACTOR: Merco Construction Enp;ineers, Inc. DATE: Februarv 9. 1972 JOB: BEACH RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, REACHES 17, 18 & 19, CONTRACT NO. 3-16 Amount of this change order (ADD) (~~~~~) $ 3,409.15 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or detjuctions from the contract price are hereby approved. ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES ADD Item Change No. Unit From -- 5 L.F. 229i· 8 L.F. 40 11 V.F. 80 21 Ea. 4 22 C.Y. 10 DEDUCT 6 L.F. 57~9 7 L.F. 7 0 Board authorization date: ~' February 9, 1972 Agenda Item #25 Est 1 d. Quant. To 2354 63 @r7. 85/L.F. $ 1,754055 267 227 @ 5/L.F. 1,135.00 119 39 @r2/v:. F . . · 2,418.00 11 7 @ 15%Ea. 1,050.00 22 12@ 50 C.Y. 600.00 Total Add $ 6,957.55 5722 57 @t2L 20/L.F. $ 1,208.40 -0-780 @ 3/L.F •. 2,340000 Total Deduct $ 3,548.40 TOTAL ADD $ 3,409.15 Original Contract Price $ __ 4_5_ 3,_1_2_2 o_l_5_ Prev. Auth. Changes C.0.#1,24 $ ___ 4_,_1_1_3_._6_o_ 3 & This Change (ADD) (1'.1KI1M~~~ $ __ 3_,_4_09_._1_5_ Amended Contract Price $ ___ 4_6_o~'~6_4_4_o~9_0_ -0- Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Ch1ei' Engineer MERCO CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERS, INC. By~----------~-------------------District 3 RESOLUTION NO. 72-21-11 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, A PORTION OF REACH 1 AND REACHES 2 AND 3, CONTRACT NO. 3-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, A PORTION OF REACH 1 AND REACHES 2 AND 3, CONTRACT NO. 3-17 * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11, or Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering, District's engineers, for construction of the KNOTT INTERCEPI'OR, A PORTION OF REACH 1, AND REACHES 2 AND 3, CONTRACT NO. 3-17, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m., March 9, 1972, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of District No. 3 and the Districts' Engineers be authorized to advertise, and to open said bids as agents on behalf of District No. 11; and, Section 5. That County Sanitation District No. 3 is hereby authorized to award contract for said Contract No. 3-17 as agent on behalf of County Sanitation District No. 11. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting on February 9, 1972. Agenda Item #38 -P-District 11 RESOLurrrou rm. 72-22-11 FEDEHAL AHD STATE GR/\NTS -KNOT'r .Hl'rERCEPTOR ~ A PORTIOI:r OF REACH 1, A)TD REACH 2 ______ _ A HESOLUTION OF 1rHE BOARD OF DIRECTOHS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRicrr rro. 11, OF ORAHGE COUl'fIY' CALIFORNIA, AUrrHORIZING AHD DIRECTING EXECUTION AND FILING OF DOCUMEj:ITS NEC3SSARY FOR FEDERAL GRANT UHD3R 33 U.S. C. , h66 ET SEQ. , AND STATE GRANT UHDER CLEAN HATER BOND LAW OF 1970 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, C~lif ornia DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER 'I'HNr: Section 1. An Act of Congress knm·m as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C., 466 et seq.) provides for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 2. The State Clean Water Bond Law of 1970 authorizes t~e State Water Resources Control Board to enter into contracts with public agencies for State grants for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 3. County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange ColLDty, is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer system for t_he collection of sewage from the cities and other local collection sewering agencies. Section 4. County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, has heretofore entered into an agreement with County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, whereby the two said Districts ·will share in the cost of the construction of certain joint interceptor facilities as said facilities and cost shares are set .forth in said agreement. Said agreement also provides that County Sanitation District No. 3 will construct and operate said facilities and thereby is deemed to be the "Central Agency" for said grant applications as set forth in the California Administrative Code. Agenda Item #39 Q.-1 District 11 ~ectiot1 5. The General Manager is hereby authorized to prepare, sign, and submit, in behalf of County Sanitation District No. 11 all docwnents necessary to apply for and accept a construction grant under said Act of Congress and said Clean Water Bond Law for a joint project generally described as: Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1, and Reach 2 · Section 6. County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, is herepy designated "Central Agency" of said construction .project as defined in the California Administrative Code and is directed to act as agent for County Sanitation District No. 11 in all ways necessary to carry out the purposes and intent of County Sanitation District No. 11 as hereinabove expressed. Agenda Item 1139 Q-2 District 11 RESOLUTION NOo 72-23-7 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE ATCHISON 2 TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOo 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Chairman and the Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 7, be authorized and directed to accept and sign that certain Pipe Line License from the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company dated January 17, 1972, identified by Engineer's Drawing No. L-5-31703; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized to forward said license in duplicate to the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for execution and return; and, Section 3. That said license be accepted and approved by the District upon the filing of a duly executed copy therof in the office of the Secretary; and, Section 4. Payment in the amount of $150.00 to cover the license fee is hereby authorized to be made to the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 9, 19720 Agenda Item #h3 -R-District 7 . i ORDINANCE NO . 714 AN ORDINANCE AMEND ING ORD I NANCE 712 .AND REPEALI NG ORD I NANCE 713 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No . 7 of Orange County , California, does ordain as fol l ows : ARTICLE I Ordinance 713 is hereby r epealed . ARTICLE 2 Secti ons 1 , 2, and 3, Article 2 of Ordinance 712 is hereby amended to read as foll ows: Section (a ) of Article 6 of Ordinance No . 7 11 is amended to r ead as follows : (a) District Connection Charg e s . No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage faci l ity or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a District connection charge is paid by the applicant, provided, however , that such fee shall not be payable when a permit is issued for the re -connec t ion or alteration of an e xisting connection for the same use made by the District or at the request of the District . No connec tion permit shall be issued unless there is an estab lished use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which establishes the use of said property . The following District connection charges are hereby established and shall be paid to the District o r to an agency designed by the District :· (1) Regular connection Charge , Res idential Uses . (a) Single family dwe llings . $150 per dwelling unit . Said charge shall b e increased by $25 .00 on July 1, 1972 and annually thereaf ter on July 1st for the next succ ee ding thre e year s ~ Age nd a I tem #44 S -1 District 7 (b) Multiple dwellings. $250 per dwelling unit. A multiple dwelling is any structure designed or used for residential purposes which would require use zoning of a greater density than R-1 zone as R-1 zone is defined in the Orange County Zoning Code, Section 78.0214.1 through 78.0214.6 inclusive, if such zoning classification would be required to make the use of the subject property in con- formity with applicable zoning standards of the County of Orange. (2) Regular Connection Charge, Commercial or Industrial Establishments. $375 per acre of area (computed to nearest l/lOth of acre) provided that such charge shall not be less than $150. The term "commercial or industrial establishments" as used herein shall include property owned or occupied by governmental agencies and non-profit organization. Commencing on July 1, 1972, said charge per acre and minimum charge shall be increased to $437.50 and $162.50 respectively and annually on July 1 for the next succeeding three years, said charges shall be increased by $62.50 per acre and $12.50 respectively. (3) Trunk Connection Charge, Residential Uses. (a) Single Family Dwelling Unit. $6.oo per front foot for the real property fronting on and connecting to a trunk sewer provided that no such charge shall be less than $400.00 plus the applicable regular connection charge for single family dwelling hereinabove specified. -2- Agenda Item #44 S-2 District 7 (b) Multiple Dwelling Units. $6.oo per front foot for the real property fronting on and connecting to a trunk sewer provided that no such charge shall be less than $400.00 plus the applicable regular connection charge for multiple family dwellings hereinabove specified. ARTICLE 3 Except as herein amended, Ordinance No. 712 is ratified, reaffirmed and is to become effective April 1, 1972, as amended by this Ordinance. ARTICLE 4 The Chainnan of the Board of Directors shall sign this Ordinance and the Secretary of the Districts shall attest thereto and certify to the passage of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be published once in the Tustin News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed, published and circulated in County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, within fifteen (15) days after the date of the passage of this Ordinance by said Board of Directors, and said Ordinance shall take effect April 1, 1972. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held February 9, 1972. Agenda Item #44 S-3 District 7 CL.-.RK MILLER C. ARTHUR NISSON NELSON KOGLER H. L.-.wsoN MEAD MILLER, NISSON 8J KOGLER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2014 NORTH BROADWAY SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706 February 3, 1972 Board of Directors County Sanitation District #7 .p. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: Re: County Sanitation District #7 Annexation No. 25 • T,ELF.:PHONE AREA CODE 714 542. ·6771 As the attorney for those parties who are seeking annexation of the 9.52 acres which belong to the Jones Trust in the East Orange area, I respectfully request that your Board ·initiate the annexation of this acreage by resolution to the Local Agency Formation Commission. I have already obtained a consent to the annexation signed by the Trustees of the Jones Trust, v~hich is the owner of this property. To obtain this consent required nearly a month's time since one of the Trustees resides in Europe and the other in Los Angeles. To obtain their signatures on a petition could necessitate another month's time. If the Board would initiate the annexation by way of resolution this time loss could be saved. Time is most important in this matter. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, i r ti' .' . . Q" ---\ , --.. ' -." ' . l . t ~~)JV Jh \ Av., _. H. Lawson Mead HLM:cp ,, Agenda Item #45a -T-District 7 The of Orange DOES That be made to RESOLUTION NOo 72-24-7 AN1'IBXATION NOo 25 -CHAPMAN EAST ANNEXATION A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOo 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT ( ANNEXATION NOo 25 -CHAPMAN EAST ANNEXATION) * * * * * * * * * * * Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. County, California, HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERI"'.IINE AND ORDER: an application for annexation of territory to itself the Local Agency Formation Commission as follows: 7, Section 1. That this proposal is made pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California; and, Section 2. That this application is for the purpose of annexing 9.52 acres of real property to provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory, as requested by Trustees for the property owner; and, Section 3. That the territory to be annexed in uninhabited; and, Section 4. That the designation assigned said annexation is "Chapman East Annexation -Annexation No. 25", the boundaries of which are more particularly described and delineated on Exhibit "A" and Exhibit nB", attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 5. That provisions for fees required to be paid as I a condition of the annexation must be satisfied prior to completion of annexation proceedings; and, Section 6. That request is hereby made that such proceedings as required by law be taken to compl-ete this annexation. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 9, 1972. Agenda Item #45b -U-District 7 Agenda Jtem No .... /5.._ __ November 5, 1971 MEMORANDUM TO: EDWARD JUST, JOINT CHAIRMAN FROM: ROBERT FINNELL, CHAIRMAN, SPECIAL COMMITI'EE STUDYING DIRECTORS' FEES SCHEDULE SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION FOR CHANGES IN THE PRESENT DIRECTORS' FEES SCHEDULE The following report constitutes the recommendations of the special committee appointed by the Joint Boards at the regular board meeting of March 10, 1971. During this period the committee has met on a number of occasions and has requested and receiv~d detailed information from both the Sanitation Districts' staff and the Districts' General Counsel. The,committee has reviewed several alternatives which are discussed below. (1) Maintain the Directors' compensation at the present level as established by resolution of the individual Districts in 1967 and 1968. The special committee concluded that the present fee structure is inequitable and that another alternative should be sought. (2) Amend the fee schedule so that those Directors representing more than one District at a joint meeting would only .receive compensation equal to that of a Director representing a single District. The General Counsel ruled that under the present Health and Safety Code the Sanitation District does not have the authority to discriminate in its fees. This alternative could be achieved, however, by requesting the State Legislature to enact special legislation. It was the consensus of the special committee that because such legis- lation would affect all sanitation districts in the State of California, the chances of securing passage of such legislation were slim. It was also agreed that even if such legislation could be enacted it would be time consuming and would not solve other problems whict will be facing the Districts in the near future. / .. The special committee does recommend, however, that if the Joint Boards do not agree with the committee's recommended alternative, serious consideration should be given to requesting legislative action to accomplish the reduction of ·multiple fees to a single Director. (3) Consolidate the various Sanitation Districts tnto one County Sanitation District with opera- tions, maintenance, and capital outlay costs split evehly throughout the new District. While this would achieve many of the goals the committee felt were needed, it would create tax increases in Districts 5, 6, and 7, while · lowering taxes in Districts 1, 3, and 11. It would have no effect on District 2. The Com- mittee concluded that this would not be an equitable distribution of costs and therefore does not recommend this alteFnative. Consolidate the present Sanitation Districts into one Cottnty Sanitation District with special zones which would be co-terminus with existing Districts·' boundaries and it would have separate budgets, could issue bonds, and incur bonded indebtedness for improvements and the maintenance thereof within the special zone. In effect, this alternative would provide for · only one Sanitation·District but would allow for special zones which would be the equivalent of the present County Sanitation Districts which would have no effect on the tax rates of each of the present Districts. The consolidated agencies would act as a single Sanitation District now acts. The existing Joint Administrative Organization would be eliminated as would the necessity for seven sets of resolutions, minutes, seals, etc., for joint business. Rather than having District No. 1 act as agent for all the Districts it would merely be one District. There would be no duplication of Directors in that each now represented, and the County Board of Super-, 'f l)J~· , city within the District, each Sanitary District \ · visors, would have a single representative and ,~~1 an alternate for a total of 23 active Directors. d The committee felt. that this latter point was one which deserved special attention of the Joint Boards. At the present time there are -2- 29 Directors representing 19 cities and 3 Sanitary Districts and the County Board of Supervisors. However, if Districts No. 5 and No. 11 annex presently unincorporated areas, the entire city councils of the Cities of Newport Beach and Huntington Beach will automatically become the Board of Directors for those two Sanitation Districts. This will increase the number of Directors to 36 with two cities having 14 representa- tives voting on matters before the Joint Boards~ In addition, if each of the mayors of cities belonging to more than one District should elect a different alternate to repre- sent them in each District, the number of Directors could go as high as 48. This would more than double the number of Directors which would be possible under this proposed alter- native. The committee felt that the unwieldy nature of such a large Board· would be detri- mental to the efficient operations of the Districts. ' . . This· alternative would also have the effect of substantially reducing the number of special districts, an objective formally endorsed by the Orange County Board of Supervisors, the Orange County Division of the League of California Cities, and the Orange Collilty Grand .Jury. At the same time, it would still provide the mechanism for solving local problems by providing for zone committees equivalent to the present Districts' Boards. Last but certainly not least, the reduction in Directors fees would amollilt to a sub- stantial savings to the taxpayers of the Districts. The committee recommends the adoption of this alternate plan. It has prepared for the re- view of each Director, a proposed consolidation agreement. It is recommended that this item -3- ·. . . . be placed on the December 8, 1971 ~genda ror a discussion and vote by the membership of the Joint Boards. Respectfully submitted, 1--];~f ¥~!mt/ R~tert Finnell · Chairman· ... ·. . ~ . .- Members of the Special Corn.mi ttee: Chairman: ·' Members: Ex officio !·1embers: Robert Finnell_, !-~ayor .-' City of Placentia Joseph Eyde_, Councilman _Clty of Los Ala.mi tos LindsJ.ey Parsens, Councilrnan -, City of Newport Beacn '" Don Smith, 1-:3.yor City of Orange Mark Steph'=nson, City of Anaheim Council:nan C. Arthur Nissori, General Counse:J:_ Orange County Sanitation Districts Edward Just, Joint Chairman -Orange County Sanitation Districts , ... 4_ · . . . AGREEMENT FOR CONSOLIDATION DRAFT 9/29/71 This Agreement made in Fountain Valley, California, on day of ---~~~~--~~-' 19 , by and between COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOSo 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY (each hereinafter referred to collectively as "Districts 11 ). · W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Districts are organized and existing under the provisions of the County Sanitation District Act . (Section 4700, et seq. of the Health & Safety Code), and ' WHEREAS, Districts are each engaged in the collection, transporting and disposal of sewage and industrial wastes originating with the County of Orange, and WHEREAS, Districts jointly own and operate property used for the treatment and disposal of sewage and industrial wastes, and WHEREAS, each District serves a different territory of the County of Orange and owns certain sewerage facilities inaependent of each other District, ~nd WHEREAS, the territory of all districts together constitute a contiguous territory, and WHEREAS, by agreement districts maintain a single . joint administrative organization which administers all of the affairs of each districts, and WHEREAS,, by reason of assess·ed va~uations, varying· states of development and la~d uses, each district has different requirements for funding its operations, and WHEREAS, many administrative benefits can be derived from a consolidation of all districts into a single county sanitation district, and WHEREAS, the County Sanitation District Act provides for the maintenance of zones within.a single county sanitation district (Health & Safety Cod~, Section 4850-4856, inclusive) which can be maintained to keep existing tax burdens in similar proportions upon consolidation of the districts. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the agreements set forth hereinafter, it is agreed as follows: 1. That the districts will petition for consolidation into one county sanitation district whose territory will include all of the territory now contained within their respec- tive territorial boundaries. 2. The consolidation district, hereinafter called , will be known as ~~~~~---~~~- 3. When formed, will be divided into zones ----- as authorized under the provisions of Health & Safety Code, Section 4850-4856, inclusive. Said zones will be coterminous with existing boundaries of each district and sub-committees of the directors will be created to recommend to the whole board of directors the special improvements and tax requirements for each zone. Each sub-committee shall include the directors whose constituencies are significantly included within the zone they are to be concerned with. r ~ ~ 4. ·rn determining the revenues needed for each zone within as provided in Health & Safety Code, Section 4856, the directors shall calculate the requirements for each zone insofar as the operation of is dis- tinguished from the special sewerage facilities constructed, maintained and operated to serve the localized requirements of the zones in accordance with the joint ownership, operation and construction agreement dated March 10, 1971, now existing by ·and between the districts, parties to this agreement. 5. The expressed intent of this agreement is to provide the means to maintain the existing proportions of the tax burden on the property within each district to be included in the newly consolidated .• DRAFT 2/23/72 ALL DISTRICTS ' It was moved, seconded and duly carried : Amending minutes of That the last paragraph of page 7 of regular January 12, the minu tE~ 9..,f 1'he, re~u lar meeting.9.. :.J-.1 ~~ ~~i ~.~~,,~;tJ:~> held January 1 2 , 1972~ be amend ~d to 1972 meet ing read as follows: Following further discussion, a substitute motion to table the matter until the regular meeting of the ~.oint Boards in February in order to provide the Board ~f Supervisors time to take a position was moved, seconded and duly carried. Note : Approval o f minutes by each District shall r ead as follows : Moved , seconded and duly carried that the minutes of the regular meeting he.ld January 12 ,. 1972 , as previously mailed, be app roved as amended . For Districts 3 and 7 special and adjourned meetings. --=-~) / should be approved~s mai l ed . AL L DISTRIC TS The Joint Chairman presented a Report of the Certificate of Completion to Joint Chairman Apprentice Terrence Williams who satisfactor ily completed th e Apprentice I program and the r equired study and application in each of the following: Plant Maintenance, Collection Facilities Maintenance,~~~W.~~-~, Electrical Maintenance, Treatment Plant Operat i ons ~ Laboratory Proc e dures , and General Engineering Practic e s. ~~Jew ~;{" Chairman Just reported :::::~t:l:.,4-:J-~k~~ of the California;\~tioh M SaRHaHen Ag!!l'!e..,..s held in Indian Wells, January 27 /t .hr>fugh the 29th ~ He a.dvj sed tl:ia:t ~he , 4'- ~..f \.'.. Gt.._ • cz:; ~ ~_,,,, . Association h.-:tAJ hange( ~thei~ame ~ the Ca lifornia Sanitary~ ~ S . t t . B .a:-~~ . t . t t'h t . H 1 an1 a ionia~sBace1a ~n ,~ue mee ing. ea so / p. 2 noted t hat the Association, at the request of the Districts ' General Counsel, had gone on record ~ supporting permissive legis lation to amend provisions of the Health and Safety Code ~ with regard\c compensation for Direc tors representing more ~~ than one ~istrict oper~t ing under joint powers arrangements. ~ TheftChairman advised the Directors that the Board of Supervisors would be considering final approval of permits for District No. 2 for const:n.ction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No . f -14 in the Flood Control District right -of-way; a.P. .i.IJ J U:,~-_ ~t~/\-l~rftl \/WMlw, watJ_J °'if~ ~-{A. ~"-'•v-~ ~ ~~E_ The Chairman then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for 6 :00 p .m., Tuesday, February 29, and invited Directors Phillips and Ralph Clark to attend and participate in the discussions . ALL DISTRICTS Report of t he The General Ma~a~er referred the f'1~ 1/6 Directors to~Mayor Griset 's General Man a ger memorandum on HR 11896 (Blatnik), a presently bill/under considerati on by the House Public Works Committee to amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act . Mr . Harper stated that Mayor Griset had been extremely effective in his ~~. meetings with officials in Washington, D. C. to ~ the Board.Y's 1 concern over certain provisions of the bill . Mayor Griset met with congres smen and staff members of the House of Representatives Public Works Committee and also with representatives of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies and the National League of Cities and Council of Mayors . Officials appeared very r eceptive to the expressed conc ern over the proposed discharge requirements, and requested that additional information be provided to support suggested changes in language in the ~bill . Mr . Harper advised t he Boards that the information had been prepared by the Districts' staff and forwarded to Washington . p . 3 Director Griset commented briefly on his meetings in Washington and observed that the representative of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies in Washington is highly regarded and is the logical man to do the final legal work in connection with the efforts to amend the BlatnikABill . He also recalled (J,¥r the timeliness of th~ Districts 1 1 Unifonn Connection and Use Ordinance ~~ control of toxicant discharges at the source, which is the trend of pending legislation . The General Counsel reported on his Report of the attendance at the meeting of the General Counsel Attorneys Committee of the California Association of Sanitation Agencies Annual Work Conference in Indian Wells January 27 -29, and stated that he had submitted copies of the proposed pennissive legislation to amend the Health and Safety Code to limit Directors ' fees for attending ------ concurrent meetings of more than one District. as previously discussed by the Districts' Directors -------- ~~-~~~~~----- ALL DISTRICTS Following a discussion by Directors Receive and file in connection with recommendations report of Executive contained in the report of the Committee Executive Committee, it was moved seconded and duly carried : That the J;@.gn J::ar 'port of the Exe cu ti ve Committee on their meeting held January 25, 1972, be received and ordered filed . ALL DISTRICTS Actions in connection with proposed amendment4 to Rules of Procedure for Meetings re · "Attendance Defined" The Board entered into a lepgthy dis - cussion of the proposed amendment to Rules of Procedure for Meetings by the addition of Section 18 entitled "Attendance Defined ". The Chair recognized several Directors who expressed their views on the proposed amendment which would provide for a p, L~ change 4 in the Board 1 s establ i shed Rules of Proc e dure by defining Board me e ting atte ndanc e a nd placi n g the determ inatio~~he ~fi; ~.eth e·~ br~ t.:R.@-&-v;en-t-e~B-t:i.i:;ig, er --., t hE7<roint Chairman , in th..a...;.eJLe nt of a _Joi-nt-Me-e-t---:Lng-. . Following the discussion) t h e following actions were taken : District s 1,2,3,5 & 11_ Cons i deration of action to strike Age nda item re proposed Res olution ---·-;i:r No . 72 -11,%1eslof, __ Pro cedure for Meeting s_ It was moved and seconded that t he i tem regarding c onsideration of Resolution No . 72-ll J am e nding Resolution No . 6L~-3J Ru l es of Proc e dure for Meetings ) as amended5 ~ b y the addition -of ~ Section 1 8 entitled "Attendance Defined" as prep@.red by t h@ Ge n effti Gounsel b e strike n from the ~e nda . Following a roll c:all vote i-B each of t he Di~tricts J t he Genera l Co uns e l announce d that the motion had failed in Di stricts Nos. 1J 2J3 J 5 and 1 1. Distri cts 6 a nd 7 S triking from Ag enda ~~ ~o nsidera .t.i ~~ G.f p r oposed Resolution am ending No . 72 -11 ,/Rules of It was moved; seconded and duly c arried~ ~ er.JJ ~ .' That the item regarding conside r a - t ion ·o f Resolution No . 72 -llJ amending Resolution No . 64-3 J -Rules P1'ocedure for Meetings of Procedure for Ivieetings J as ~~- arnended b v the addition,of Section 18 e n titled "Attendance 7 v ' Defined " as prepar~d by the Ge ne:ral Counsel be striken from the ~enda . District 3 tu.. ~J;.µx_ Acti on ~€1:-J..anguage of propo s ed Res olution No . 72-11 amending Ru l e s of Procedur e fo r Meeti ngs p . 5 I t was moved and seconded that proposed Re s olution No . 72-11/ amending Resol ution No . 64-3 , Rules of Procedure for Meetings , k- ...PtS amended by striking the words "Joint Chairman" and repla cing them with the words "Distri ct Chairman o r Chai rm a n p r o tem ." The motion f ailed to c a r ry by roll call vote . Dist ric t 1 Co nside ration of Reso lution No . 72-11 amending Ru les of Procedur e fo r Mee t ings P rocedure for Meet i ngs, as It was moved !and seconded that the Bo a rd .of Direc tors adopt Resol ution No . 72-1 1 amending Res olution No . 64 -3 , Ru+es of ~ amende~ by the addition 1of Section 18 ent i tled 11 Att endance Defined 1~ as prepared by the Gene r al Counsel . The resolution failed to carry by roll call vote . Distric t s 2 , 3 , 5 2 & 11 Adopti ng Res olution No . 72-1 1 ame n ding Rules o f Procedure for Meetings I t was moved , seconded and dul y carried ko ~ eal.J nr/:L That t he Board of Directors adopt Resolution No . 72-11 a.mending Resolution No . 64 -3 , R~of P r ocedure for Meetings , as a.mended) by the a ddi tionl'of Section 1 8 entitled 11 Attendance Defined 11 as pre pare d by the Ge neral Counsel . ) Certif i ed copy of this reso l ution is attached hereto and made a part of these minut es . Dis trict 7 Reconsideration of action striking Resolution No . 72-11 from Agenda I t wa s moved and seconded that the I;l oaI d o f Directors of Dis L!'lt! L Ne.--'He-ifistate en the-A~ the item for cons i d e ration of Resolution No . 72-11 .a.mending ' . p .6 Resolut ion 64-3, Rules aocedure for Meetings, as amended)·by the addition~of ~Section 18 entitled "Attendance f.efined'; as prepa1ed by the General Cowrnel kr ~~fr 1e~1d:r:.~~y the Bgs rd ~ The motion failed to carry by rol l call vote . \ DI STRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried · Def erring consideration by roll, call vote: of report of Special That consideration of the ~eport Committee Studying of the Special Committee for Directors ' Fees Schedule Studying Directors' Fees S c h edule_,_A h;k... ~ -t1.... ~. b e deferred to an adjourned meeting to be held ;it&R Pebruary 29 , 1~2 . DISTRICTS 1,2,3 ,5,6 & 11 Conside ration of report of Special Committee Studying Directors' Fe e Schedule It was moved and secorred that the recommendation of the Special Committee for Studying Di.rectors 1 Fees Schedule, to consolidate pre sent Sanitation Districts into one Sanitation District with special zones which would be co -termi nus with existing Districts ' boundaries and have separate budgets and the authority incur bonded indebtedness and t h e maintenance thereof within the special zones , be adopt e d . The Board then entered into a , discussion in conne ction with the effect 0=f'~;;p -.Sf'vsf.td.-on adm i nistration of the Districts ' activities under the revised organizational structure which ~ould result from adopti~n _o~ tDe Special Commitke e 's recommendation . £:.,,. • • JZAI ~~ ~ 'l.rUM.r> ~ ~a--r<t-x P c.n.~l.~ , Following a roll call vote in each of the Districts, the General Counsel announced that the motion had failed to p ass b y virtue of a tie vote; Districts 2 , 3 and 11 voting in favor, and Districts 1, 5 and 6 voting against s a id motion. p.7 ~ . . , ALL DISTRICTS It was moved and seconded that Authorizing General Counsel to seek permis~.;.i,,ve ~l~sla -l-k ~... " . cJ..t_ t i on amending~fees ~dule for Directors ~g ~ore than one District the General Counsel be directed to seek permissive legislation to amend Section 4733 of the Health and Safety Code ('f ower of Board to fix compensa- tion of memqe:r:i : Maximum: Compensation .. ~G in addition to other f ees) by the additionnof a new section, as follows : "Health & Safety Code, Section 4733 .5: Power of Board to Limit Compensation of Members for Attendance at Joint Meetings Where two or more county sanitati on districts have joined in the purchase, ownership , use, construction, maintenance , or operation of a sewerage system, or sewage disposal or treatment p l ant , or refuse transfer or disposal syste , or both, eithe r within or without the districts, or have so joined for any combination of these purposes, as provided in Section 4742, and the districts hol d their meetings jointly, and one or more of the directors serve as a director on more than one of such dis t ricts meeting jointly, the districts may, by joint resol ution approved by each district , limit the compensation of such a director to compensation equal to not more than $50 for each jointly held meeting attended by him not to exc eed $100 in any one month for attendance at jointly held meetings ;" and , to amend Section 4734 of the Health and Safety Code (Compensation of Joint Cha i rman ~ k eetings of cooperating rcounty sanitation districts) by adding thereto the following: "; provided , however, the maximum compensation to be paid such ~nt chairman shall not exceed $250 per month ." The Board Aentered into a lengthy discussion regarding compensation of Directors representing more than one District and the Joint Qhairma~'s compensation, as re~ommended by the Executive Committee~ r ~ <U~ ) CN..-·~..J o jf1).e Board also fu rther d-;i scrnzsed the "eport of the Special Committee Studying Directors ' Fees Schedu l e~,in thio xegar~. }µvJ ~ l"4/."~ Following Y discussion) a substi tute motion Ito clarify the intent of the Execut ive Committee 's recommendat ion in relation to the £.eport of the Special Committee Studying Directors ' Fees Schedule;.~e~d-: Gf\. The motion was not seconded. ... ,. 1:u~ ~ ~-u-L~ Urzvl ~~.t J ~ .u...~~p . s w/ ~-j 1,~ ~~ --(! k~-'i ~ It-wars -t~e-me:k:eP-o-:e--t-he-e-r±gtna±-m0'6-~ndJis-econdeEJ. ') ) t.l:).._g._t .-the-m.ot4on-0n-tfie-fiocrr-be-amended te delete tfie proposed amendment to Section 4734 of the Health and Safety Code (Compensat ion of Joint Chairmanfor meetings of co~J1i=~'3::;g county sanitation districts) by~ding there~~~~: "; provided , however, the maximum compensation to be ~~d :~~l~:rJ ~i ~n ~~n~~ ~!:~~~f~h ." ~ mot4onvp~ssed in each District.by roll eall vuL e . ' ~~~ At 8 :45 p .m. ALL DISTRICTS /The Chairman declared a rece ss Recess to allow the General Counsel to research the Health and Safety Code in response to a question in connection with provisions for compensation of the Joint Ch airm a n . ALL DI STRICTS Reconvene ALL DISTRICTS At 9 :00 p.m . the Board reconve n e d . (V~'-: in11 ~ssion. The General Co unsel reported t h at under the current provisions of t h e 2>tate Heal th & Safety Co de) it was not possible to redu~e the compensation of the J o int Chairman without furthe·r ·legislation . It was then moved that t he General Counsel be d irected to s ~~~a~ion_ ~ amend Section 4734 of the Health and Safety Co de~b y adding thereto the following: "; provided , however , the maximum compensation to be paid such joint chairman shall not exceed $250 per monrJ:;~~~/ Following further discussion a roll call vote was taken and~D-istr)ct,,s_ ~~V, No.s.....--.1:1-a:rrd-rt~IT'14~l-l'~~·i-lq.,s_t-±be max.ion ; Districts No s . 1, 2 , 3, 6 , ~ of the motion) 0/--e tl·~ Yi n · ~ N J1 ~p "'t;., .... :f and 11 voted in favor ~fl~ Mid -Year Budget Review received and order ed filed The Di rector of F i nance report ed briefl y on the mid -year budget review previous l y mailed , to the Directors . He pointed o u t that joint oper ating ex,p~~9ditures for the first six months of 1971 -72 had ~-z· "9~dr.flJ decre~se~in omparison with the same periodilir 1970 -7~and explained the f actors wh i ch had contributed to the cost savings . I t was then moved , seconded and duly carried: That the report of the Director of Finance on the mid-year budget review , dated Jtk ~,t51,'Y be received , " ordered fi l ed , and approved. ( Progress Report on r equest to serve 20 acre par cel of land in Los Angeles Coun t y The General Manager requested a policy directive from the Board in connection wit h service of a r eas outside the District . The engineers for the developer of a 20 acre parce l of land have requested sewerage J.rc;L") service for the property which is ~in Los Angeles County , adjac e nt to District No . 3 . The parcel is l Qi Q ~ed easterly of the San Gabriel River and service of the area ~ Orange County would avoid construc - river tion of a/crossing . Any arrangement for sewering the area would have to be made through the local public a g ency and each of the joint Districts would have to approve the agreement. Fo l lowing a brief discussion , it was the consensus of the Directors that additional information shoul d be obtained in connection with the matter. It was then moved , seconded and duly carried: That the staff and engineers be directed to request additional information from the developer of the property and the local a g encies which might serve the area and report back to the Board . Declaring intent to consolidate with Sanitation District No . 4 Director Holden distributed c o p i es of a memorandum addressed to KN~ Di stri ct No. 3 requesting that the Board o f Directors take action dec l ar i ng thei r intent to conso l idate with County Sanit at i on District No . 4 of Orange County . It was pointed out that the proposed con s o lidation conformed to t he adopted Interi m Basin Plan of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board -Santa Ana Region , and that a l etter of intent f r om the respective Districts was necessary to enab l e further processing of Federal and State grant,funds for Dis t rict No .4 . Fo llowing a br i e f discussion it was moved , seconded and duly carri ed : That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No . 3 ~ dec l ares its intent to conso lidate County Sani tation District No . 4 into County Sanitat i on District No. 3 i n accordance with the policies and procedures for annexation to County Sanitation District No . 3) as provided in Resolution No . 72 -6 -3 . Dis cu ssion re Qu i tc l aim of easement to Irvine Company Fo llowing a br i ef report by the General Counsel in connection with quitclaiming of a portion of an easement adjacent to Pacific Coast Highway at the Bay Bridge Pump~ Station)which is no longer used by t h e Districts , it was moved , seconded a n d duly carried : That the matter be referred back to the staff for report back at the next regular board ~e~ting . Ci)~. ~A...~ ./f -O~din~nce 'Vlo -,,J. O The Genera l Counse l reported on proposed Ordinanc e No . 714 amending the existing connection and use ordinance and requested tNat direction from the Board regarding the defi nition of "multip l e dwelling units" as i t relates to motels and hotels. Following a brief discussion it was moved, seconded and dul y carried : That the matter be deferred to an adjourned meeting to be held later in the mont h. the last paragraph on page 7 of the No . 4 -Director Finnellmoved to amend/the minutes of Jan . 1 2, 1 972 to read: Following further discussion a substitute motion to t able t he matter until the regular meeting of the Joint Boards in February in order to provide the Board of Supervisors time to t a ke a position, was moved , seconded and duly carried . Mo tion passed . No . 5 -Presented certificate to Terranc e Williams . Called an Executi ve Commitee meeting for Tues day the 29th and invited Phillips and Clark to a t tend and participate . Meeting at 6 :00 p .m. Reported on meeting attended with JWS and Bruce Taylor of CSSDA . Re commendati on came out to change name to CASA, California Assoc iation of Sanitation Agencies . Nissan got support from Association for permissive legislation . Ef§X~M~XX~~lfXH~~H Board of Supervisor will be considering next we e k the right -of-way re Santa. Ana River Inte;rcepto r, next week . We wi ll be asking Board to adopt a resolution r egardin g this . No . 6 -The General Ma nager r epo rted that the Board may wish to have Director Griset, who did a ter r ifi c job representing the Districts in Washington a few weeks ago, report on his impressions of the water pollution control activities in Washington. Mr . Harper reported that the information requested by Griset had been submitted to the tegislators on the public works committee of the House of Representatives . the AMSA :xl§~~ X~HH:niHX lobbist in Washington XX~H also got informa tion f rom our offices . Griset -Impressed with tremendous n eed in our joint districts to express themselves back the r e . I Just -Mr . Griset XRKll.llm~~x±xNRN accomplished more with one visit then we coul d have done with many letters . Smith -going to Washington in March -will be willing to help in any way he can Just -Anyone going back check with Mr . Harper and he will coordinate our activities -will advise us as to what can be done, etc . Smith -Perhaps Mr . Harper could furni sh him with a list of those who we should ~~MX~ contact who could be of help to our Districts Harper -One o f our Congressmen, Anderson was not awara of any of the problems here in Southern California regarding this pending legislation. Ha r per -Would like to get some of Andersons constituants to talk to him -would proably help if City of LA took position Griset -Industrial ordaince is paying off in this particular instance control of stuff coming into line upstream is valuable -feels that our ordinance was very timely No . 7 -Attended CASA meeting in Indian Wells -gave them copies of the proposed legialation and we have no ~~X problem if this is made permissive -LA county Sanitation Districts attorney was there but they are not memeers of this association . In speaking with attoney of Los Angeles Coun ty Sanitation District -they will soon be enacting an industrial waste ordinance No . 9 -Winn -Requests that the Executive Commit t ee report be mer: d 5 ,,f'}1,?'"@:!\l,~9~1 ~t~"l.l1l ed with the proposed amendment to 64-3 striken from the report -feels that this is not v productive and EC could use their time at other more important matters . Parsons -The Districts have come under a lot of c t itism that some of the Directors come here answer the roll and then have left the meeting. Felt that if M2rn:~ man is paid to attend meetings he should attend the full meeting -penalty would not be involted in all cases onl y when it is apparent that the desire is to collect fees and then leave. Just -This was brought before the Executive Committee by other members Nissan -All Boards must pass this Winn -Why wasn 1 t this brought up 8 or 10 years ago Parsons -Only has been abused lately. McWhinney -Stated that he is probably the biggest offender of this -He is a member of the Huntington Beach High School District Board -E~MMJUXXXMMXX~XXXE:IDiX~.ID§: They hold meetings same time as Sanitation Districts -doesn 't use this as an exeuse; feels that perhaps he is trying to participate in too many things at one time but feels that all the other Directors are as involved in other activities . I n regard to this amendment, he feels that the Districts individual Chairmen and not the joint chairman should rule on absences,etc. Question was proposed as to how many Directors felt that this really was a problem (attendance)? Show of hand s indicated that majority fee l that it is NOT a problem . Winn -move that this ttem be stricken from agenda Herrin -Stated that he was in attendance when this was discussed in Executive Session. people who are expressing o~ ge,.,.ve_ desire "7willingness to ~ ~ as Director of Sanitation Districts shoul ~ avail themselvesof time .Members who can not attend should notify Chairman, etc . that he cannot attend . 3 Smith -isn't that ~~ why we have alternates? Just -Sanitary District can not have alternates, Midway City Sanitary District, Garden Grove Sanitary District, etc . Hyde -Feels that this motion is part of the 11 reform movem e nt 11 Has seen meetings go from one hour meetings where everything was moved, seconded and duly carried to meetings where discussion and participation by Directors is greater . Harvey -Feels that Mr . Hyde 's statement is not true - All business conducted in the past was done so in a thorough, complete and professional manner . Meetings lasted as long as was necessary to complete all business efficiently . Hyde -Not now, but later, we will bring out the oat' r/~ minutes and look at the time periods i nvolved . Matter was voted on an~ was taken off the agenda for considerati on ~~\~ee below) in Districts 6 and 7 . 'JID§c~~~~xixt ~xiXx~mx%xmJM}9cXtXJx.x~~~~*1c MXXXM~XXXM~~MMXXIDiXXS~~XX~IDCX~X~X Prior to vote on this matter McWfuinney moved that the worMs 11 Joint Chairman" be strik.en and replaced with the words 11 District Chairman or Chairman pro tem'! Amendment was voted on in Distric t No . 3 and was defeated . (See roll call vote):W 1 Hyde -Feels that we are only doing this for the press -we see some Districts voting for this and yet voting against consolidation -the important issue -this is only part of reform Parsons -would like to move to hold over to the next meeting in District 5 since No . 5 has a split vo te and one member is absent Hirt h -Stated f hat Parsons should go ahead and move the resolution for District 5 -that the vote would not be aplit THE VOTE AS TAKEN AND CARRIED IN DI STR I CTS 2 ,3,5 ,AND ~ nn -~-3 IT WAS DEFEATED IN DI STRICT 1 . (See ro ll call) ~\...)'.JJU( -tr It was then moved that District No . 7 shoul d reconsider vot ing on this issue -motion failed ~~~ by show of hands . No . l ~Chairman Just recommended that the Districts Chairmen be allowed to speak more than onee, Director Finnell as Chairman of Special Commitee be allowed to speak more than once and that the rest o f the Directors be limited to speaking only once . Miller -Moved that this be conaidered at an adjourned meeting of District No . 7 board on t\\fth. Motion car ried by roll call vote . ~~ ~· Finnell -Moved that the Boards adopt REcommendation No. 4 Does not feel that any discussion is necessary N~XXHXXXR~~K:Kl§:X~X~XKX~~X XMKXXXX~KXMX~~~~~K~MX~~~HMii:K*X Just -relative to District No. 7 deferment -feels there was a lot of static about delaying this matter a t the last board me e ting Smith -feels that it would be a lot easier to get Df~XKXXXM~K* legislation through tha n to get all Districts to consolidate - Do all Districts have to approve legislation? Ni1son -No , only one district can initate legislation if necess ary Several questions followed as to the mech anics of conso lidat ion whethe r as far as how the zones will function, etc., «NHXHXN or not there would be any real accomplishment after cons o l idationti in that it will b e ne ces sary to maintain xw~ separate s et s of book s , separate taxing r a tes, etc. Sims -feels that only benefit ~N of consolidation is that the Direc tors' fees would red uce and tha t can be accomplished in several other ways more effic i ent ly . Finnell -Cleric a lly speaking fewerf 1 t bs books as far as minutes, not nec essary to h av e ax~X±«il:Kx d uplicate contract 7 f iles , etc . ·* S 6' a vote was taken on alternative No. 4 -it fai l ed (see roll cal:)~· Sims then moved fo r alternat ive No. 2 for permissive legislation~~~ Hyde -fe els these are beautiful words b ut that they don 't ~~~~ mean anything -think s this is only a farce -if t he direct ors~ wanted to ma ke re a l re f orm they should h ave voted fo r consol i dat ion -not this watered d own version o f reform action. XXX*KKXXH~HJGrn~M~HXXM~XXHKX Griset -stated that he f elt the joint chairman was worth $350 a month to l ead this organizat ion -thinks itis (the Distric ts) working now ve ry e fficiently Miller -Not fair f or one Director to t ry and interpret the motives of any other Director -if consolidation would h ave taken place District No . 7's taxes would h ave gone up Director Miller was corrected on this in that u n der #4 with spec ial zones there would have been no tax inc rease due to consolidation. Miller -Other influen t ing factors in his vote against colsolidation -one NXN being the District po licy in relationship to other outside agencies re annexation§, etc. ~~MK*¥XX Doesn't think it is RM right to say everyone bX is voting in opposition to number 4 just to avoid change in fee Finnell -Felt that if No. 4 not approved, we should a least get some legislation to take care of feeso Fee t h emselves do not amount to a great deal of total expense -fo r all Districts annuall l y only comes to $40,000 on a total budget of $50 ,000,000o Felt that this was only part of the problem -Real problem in getting unwieldy number of Directors -if it was wi sdom of Boards not to accept No. 4 was recommendation of committee to get No. 2 Af~~~ Mcinnis -Would like to prpopose sttE 1 i 1 -•t m9 motion to accept Alternative No . 2 as spelled out the memorandum dated November 5, ~ 1971. Feels that the amendment recommended by Executive Committee is not substantial ly the same as the recomme ndation of the Committee. This motion received no second . f'Y)c,~n Director Sims , the originator of the ~~XX~* motion 1 amended his motion to delete that portion of the amendment ~R~ as recommended by t he Executive Committee re l ating to fee of Joint Chairman . Motion passed (See roll call vote .) ~ ~ [; then It was XNN moved that the Boards consider recommendation of the Executive Committee to pay the joint Chairman not more than $250. Hyde -directed to General Counsel -do we have to get legislation on this? , . . (lp~J The Boards then adjour ned at 8:45 in order for Nisson to check Health and Safet y Code -the Boards reconvened at 9 :00 CAN -XK Does not think we can reduce j oin t chairman pay without legislation Hyde -ID'ij( How wo u ld pay of joint c hairman be paid -from what dis t rict . Prorated from Di s t ricts Nisson -Di r ectors must realize that wha t we propose as far as legi slation goes -is not necessarily what we will get back from legisl ation ~ Question : Could some ex -chairman tell u s amount of. ime spent? Culver -8 t o 1 0 hours a week Par sons -4 or 5 times m.s much as a Dist r ict chairman McWhinne y -Feels JC puts in much more time -should get more compensation than rest of members . certainly should get more compensation ~~X because he has to concern himself with seven District no t just one or two Wedaa -Wonder if i t might not be advisable to send compensation of joint chairman back to Executive Committee as we ll as pay of District Chairman . It was point ed out that this was already t he recommendatim of the Executi ve Comm i ttee and that compensation of district chairman was already discussed at EC meeting and the chairmen themselves xxxx~x did not feel actitf1~oo Jt:i 7 was necessary . It was then voted upon (see ~a~ GC directed to go ahead wi th l egislation with 5 or 7 concurring in l imitati on of JC pay No . 1 3 -JWS -------Parsons -comp l iment ed JWS on conc i se manner in whic h mat\eri al was presented Finnell concurred , . . No . 22 -(SOMETHING HAPPENED HERE -CHECK WITH HARPER) No . 26 -Parcel of 20 acres -parcel located in Los Angeles ~vfl11 'Yn::tJ7-on Orange County side of San Gabriel River -borders Seal Beach -they ~se~ to annex to the City of Long Beach - water service from Beach -would have to construct a l engthy force main , develop a ~~~ ~~~XX~~ pumping station and a gravity sewer to get to our system -MXX:rl:X~ maintained by City of Seal Beach -City Manager in Seal Beach to see i f anything can be worked out in this regard -Districts only deal with other public ~gencies -would have to be worked out with City of Long Beach -all of the Districts would have to ~ the arrangements -the developer is here tonight if anyone wants to ask any questions - would like direction from the Board as to whether they have any objection to this McWhinney -is it the recommmndation of the staff to serve this parcel FAH -Feels that it would do no harm to pursue the matter and get further information Staff instructed to do so No . 29 -Holden -passed out copies of letter from Seal Beach would like to get letter from General Manager to State Water Resou~ces Control Board -they have everything set · to get grants but still need letter -it was moved t hat the Board of Directors take action and direct the Ge neral Manager to write letter re consolidation of Districts Nos . 3 & 4 . /IJ ~ 1 I ._ FAH -Several years ago District No . 4 within the old protion of the City of Seal Beach -Board of Directors is seal Beach city council . Several year s ago~uestioned what it would take to annex to our District and disolve their District . they want to abandon t he ir treatment facilities. Hyde -is this part of the Redeve lopment Agency? Holden -Has nothing to do with it . FAH -Before t he State can recommend to the EPA to go ahead with their project they need a letter of intent . EMX They put a c l ause in the i r grant that they would receive no money until t hey have an agreement with us . Currently all they need is a letter o f intent -the particulars can be worked out later . Hyde -s t ated that he believed in consol i dation of any kind . Ni sson -~E]T.t with City Manager and City Attornyy re this . e..i 8~ .... ---~ MS&DC No . 33 -Received letter XX~~ from engineer Xfill for District and Mr . Lew i s has also , transmitting request from Irvine Company to quitc laim a portion of easement no longer in use . moved and seconded to refer to staff and report back at next meeting. No. 44 -Wants to discuss WJith City Co uncil Nisson -thinks there is a very serious problem re multiple dwelling -this includes all motel and hotels -wants direction on this from the Boards -tabul ed to the 29th . /( EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR l~ETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ' A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 , of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., February 9 , 19 72 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called end the Secretary reported a quorum of the Board present. Directors present: Directors Clifton Miller (Chairman), Ralph Clark, Lorin Griset, Ellis N. Porter, Edgar Hirth and Don Smith Directors absent: None Present: J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary of the Board DISTRICT 7 authorizing execution of License Agreement with the Atchison: Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company re: Red Hill Interceptor, Reaches 6, 7 and 8, Contract No. 7-6-4 * * * * * Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 72-23-7, authorizing the Chairman and Secretary to execute a license agreement with The Atchison, Topeka and Santa. Fe Railway Company relative to a right of way needed in the construction of Red Hill Interceptor Reaches 6, 7 and 8, Contract No. 7-6-4. Certified copy of this resolution minutes. is attached hereto and made a part of these STATE OF CALIFORN!Al SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District NQ. 7 , of Orange County, California, do hereby certify the above and fore- going to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on record taken from the minutes of the regular meeting of said Board on the 9th day of February , 19 72 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I he.ve hereunto set my hand and affixed the official see.l of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, this 9th day of February , 19 72 . S-108 Secretary, Board of Directors of County Senitation District No. 7 EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 , OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFOR~ITA A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 , of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., February 9 , 19 72 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called end the Secretary reported a quorum of the Board present. Directors present: Directors Clifton Miller (Chairman), Ralph Clark, Lorin Griset, Ellis N. Porter, Edgar Hirth and Don Smith Directors absent: None Present: J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary of the Board DISTRICT 7 Approving and authorizing execution of License Agreement with the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company re: Red Hill Interceptor, Reaches 6, 7 and 8, Contract No. 7-6-4 * * * * * Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the ~oard of Directors adopt Resolution No. 72-23-7, authorizing the Chairman and Secretary to execute a license agreement with The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company relative to resolution minutes. a right of way needed in the construction of Red Hill Interceptor Reaches 6, 7 and 8, Contract No. 7-6-4. Certified copy of this · is attached hereto and made a part of these STATE OF CALIFO.RNIA~ SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District NQ. 7 , of Orange County, California, do hereby certify the above and fore- going to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on record taken from the minutes of the regule.r meeting of said Board on the 9th day of February , 19 72 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I he.ve hereunto set m.y hand and af.fixed the. official see.l of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, this 9th day ·of Febr~ary , 19 72 . S-108 ,.--I Secretar , B a d of Directors of County Se.ni'tation District No. 7 EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, an0 11, of ORANGE COUNTY An adjourneo regular meeting of the Boar~s of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5) 6, 7, 8, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at 7:30 p.m., 19 72 , at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to or0er at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District's B:::>ard. DISTRICT 7 Adjourrunent * * * * * * * * * Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, be adjourned to February 29, 1972, at 5:00 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:30 p.m., February 9, 1972. STATE OF CALIFORNIA~ COUNTY OF ORANGE ~ SS. I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors named herein, rlo hereby certify the above and foregoing t:::> be full, true an~ correct c:::>py of minute entries on recor~ in this :::>ffice, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 9th :lay ofFebruary , 19 72 S-1og J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary of the Boards :::>f Directors of of County Sanitation Districts N:::>s. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, an.1 11 I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. SOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORN IA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENLJ.E (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) Gentleme n : Feb ruary 2, 1972 NOTICE OF SPE CIAL MEE TI NG DISTRI CT NO . 2 Wedn esday, 6 :30 p.m ., F eb ruary 9 , 1 972 10844 Ellis Avenu e Fountain Vall ey, Cali fornia TELE~HONES: AREA CODE 71 4 540-291 0 962-2411 I am call i ng a special mee ting of the Board of Dire ctors of County San it ation District No . 2 at the above hour and date , -immedi ately precedir..g the regular mee ting of the Joint Boards , t o consider the Repo rt of the Special Committee Studying Dire ctors' Fees Schedule . Copy e nclos ed . DES ·:gc II BOA RDS OF omECTORS Ii II Cou nt y Sanitat io n Di str icts of Ora nge County, Cal ifornia P. 0. Box 5175 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Val ley, Calif., 92 708 (1) (2 ) (3 ) (4) DIS TRI CT No. SPECIAL MEETI NG AGENDA ,.(\DJ OURNMENTS .... <./- COMP & MflEAGI ... V.:. .•. - FI LES SET UP ..... ~ ........ ~ R[SO LUTI OMS CEllTIF IE oi./ LETTERS WRI TTEN ... ~ .. - MINUTES WRITI~E :z: MIN UTE S FILED February 9 , 1972 -6 :30 p .m. (immediately preceding regular Joint meeting) Ro ll Call Appointment of Chairman p r o tem, if necessary Further consideration of Report of Special Committee Studying Directors ' Fees Schedule . (Copy in meeting folders .) Consideration of mot ion to adjourn * * * * * * * * * * Meeting Date DISTF.ICT 1 Griset Battin Miller Porter -..ISTRICT 2 Smith / Christie 7 Clark, Robt·~ Culver Finnell Herrin ~ Just L ~~!lips ~~ Stephenson Wedaa Winn DISTRICT 3 tiyde Battin Berton Christie Clar~ Robt. __ Culver Davis Green Harper .Harvey ·Herrin Hemeon Holden McWhinney Sims Stephenson = DISTRICT 5 Parsons Casp.ers Hirth DISTRICT 6 Porter Caspers . Mcinnis DISTRICT 7 Miller . Clark, Ralpl:L_ Quigley Griset Porter. F"gers .....,ith :_,.. DISTRICT 11 Shipley Baker Coen DISTRICT 8 Boyd Caspers Mitchell Herrin Caspers Coco Hileman Root Jackson Gome.z Gris et Harper Caspers Zuniga Dutton Machado Schniepp Kroes en Caspers Westra Root Jackson Fonte McCracken Just Kanel Gris et Lewis -Barnes Zuniga Dutton Croul Hirth Coco Caspers Fischback Herrin Hirth Hileman McCracken Caspers ·Goldberg Tir"'e __ lJ._'.~-~---Districts "2 ~"" '. ( . JOINT ~OAPJ)S ·- Just Baker Battin Berton Caspers Harper =Caspers __ Caspers Westra Christie --Root Clark, Robt .--Jackson Clark,Ralpn--·-caspers Coen -- Culver Davis .. Finnell --Fonte --Gomez --Fishbach Quigley Green Griset Harper Harvey Hemeon Herrin Hirth Holden Hyde --McCracken Herrin --Just -Kanel --Lewis --Gris et --croul --Hogard -Kroesen ·- Mc Innis McWhinney Miller Parsons --Hirth --coco Phillips --caspers Porter Rogers -Hirth Shipley --McCracken Sims ----zuniga Smith -Hileman st·ephenson --Dutton Wedaa --Machado Winn --schniepp * * * Mite-hell Boyd =Goldberg OTHERS Harper Brovm Sylvester Lewis Dunn Clarke Sigler Crabb · 1 'a V l OY- Carlson Finster Galloway Hohener Hunt Keii1h Lowry Maddox Martin.son Niss on Piersall Stevens .~ ............ ) .. SMITH -Any questions from members councils have directed how to vote can vote on - f{.{.,,., ~ ~·~I l;_}rl'.{~2- ~~~ 2.-"l-12 @(.~3.o . I of this Board ~umes most of -some have ~~~ity on wha t t hey Wedaa -Are individual votes counted within Districts -or is it cast by the jo:int boards if SMITH -is taken by individual District vote -fili~H vote is s p lit consolidation is practically impossible JUST -All Districts must concur on consolidation vote SMITH -thinks it won 't be settled tonight;if t here is a split in Districts is it defeated? HARPER -Is his understanding that on consolidation that unless it X~~ i s unanimous within a l l Districts XIDrn~ that it is recommended by General Counsel that we don't take it to Local Agency Formation Commission on a split vote -on special permissive legislation two or three Districts could get the ball rolling on changing the law on the fees -Executive Committee has reviewed ~~~~ possible legislation that could be taken. Executive Committee not proposing this but recommends if No . 4 fails SMITH -Could ~~M:M:XfillX consolidate with two or three districts if we wanted to CULVER -How about a straw vote? SIMS -reported on vote at District No . 3 meeting FINNELL -The special committee considered number of Directors that could ultimately sit -didn 't even consider Board of Supervisors a ll sitting on the Boards -Board size could really become unwie ldly . VOTE : No. 4 7 in favor No . 2 -4 in favor 1 abstain SMITH -If No . 4 alternative doesn 't win are we going to have another vote to see if anyone switches? Has anyone talked to LA County -this may also affect them . JUST -If we make it permissive it will put monkey on their back SM I TH -In G range we are in favor of No . 2 since we would like to see control stay i n immediate area JUST -Some time after April will start looking it total organization to see what it looks like F I NNELL -Something that may come up tonight is Recommendation No . 3 - expaained No . 3 in detail - e xplained that it was discarded by the committee because of inequities -a District with a large portion of their ~~~ EX big expenses behind them, their taxes would go up considerably Sims -Purpose of this was to look into fee schedule -it was raised a few years ago -we can just drop the amount Hyde -LA County Sanitation District has 31 votes ini:he l eg islatu r e , obviousl~ they will control vote if we prppose legislature Sims -How long would reorganization take under No . 4 FAR -Any actions relative to the boards would come from one Board as far as bookkeeping it will have to stay as is until bonded indebtedness is paid Just -Actual time through the legal end would be from 60 to 90 days Culver -Law states that there will be a maximum of $50 per meet i ng but we do not have to take full amount Finne ll -Would still have basic inequity -Directors representing their e ntities on two or three boards would have 2 or 3 times a basic fee Sims -How about having each council represented have a different member represent in each District Smith -Would a ll boards have to agree on No . 2 -. .. ' FAR -Out of 7 boards, if 4 voted for it, it would carry Wedaa -Would appear that t hos e with flexibility in voting could help carry 2 if 4 doesn 't carry Winn -What are chances of ge ttin No . 2 through legislature Just -We could have Orange County legislatESn introduce it as long as it is permissive we might have a chance Stephenson -N~XMXH~XK~X It was stated that it would help by not having to keep two sets of books -can 't see how if zones are separate Finnell -Thinks that this is not the main reason for consolidation R:>qraRXmigxkEaxx expanding board is reason for consolidation Smith -Still thinks that power should be a individulal district level to make decision -If consolidation is done all Districts wou ld have to make many, many decisions Sims -If number of Districts set by law, how can we consolidate FAR -Consolidation could be done under the District Re organization Act of 1 965 -would go to Local Agency Formation Commission SMITH -I f axx No . 4 is to go all Districts have to agree, right? Nisson --XfiliiX~ Yes, all Districts would have to agree Smith -Do all boards have to agree on No . 2 Nisson -No, only one Board can get the ball rolling Finnell -If it is permissive, when it comes back from legislation, each board would still have to adopt it.