HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972-02-03.-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF · ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFO~NI_A -
TELILPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
9 6 2-2411
I
P . 0 . BOX 8 1 27, FOUNTAIN VALLEY. C ALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLI D O FF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
Ge ntl emen :
January 28, 1972
NOTICE OF SPEC I AL MEETING
DI STR I CT NO . 3
·Thursday , 7 :30 p .m., February 3 , 1972
10844 Ellis Avenu e
Fo untain Valley , Cal i fo rnia
I am calling a special meeting of the Boa rd of Direc t o rs of
County Sanitat i on Di stri ct Ho . 3 a t the above hour and
d a t e to conside r the following :
1. Consideration of Report of Special Corrunittee
Studying Directors 1 Fees Schedule . Copy attached .
2. Consideiation of Resolution No . 72 -4-3, approvj.ng
pl a11s and specifications for K.nott Interceptor,
a portion of Reach 1, and Reaches 2 and 3, Contract
No . 3-17 ; and authorizing advert i sing for bids
on March 9 , 1972 , at 11 :00 a .m. See attache d.
3 . Cons i d e r a tion of Resolution No . 72 -8 -3 , approvin g
and authorizing execution of Cooperative Ag r eement
. ,.
with Orange County Flood Co ntrol Di st ri ct involving
fou r Flood Control Channel crossings pertaining to
construction of K_.nott Interceptor, a. portion of Reach
1 , and Reaches 2 and 3 , Contract No . 3 -17 . See attached .
4. Cons ide r ation of Resolution No . 72 -9-3 , authorizing
and d i recting execution and fil ing of docu.rnents
n ecessar~' f or Federal Grant and State Gr ant on
JW S :gc
Kn o t t In tercepto r, a portion of Reach 1, and Reac h es
2, 3 , and 4 . See attached .
/
BO A'.105 OF Dlr:!E CT ORS
Cou nt y Sanitation Dist ri cts P. 0 . Box 5175
of Orange County, California 10844 f:llis Avenue
Fountain Va ll ey, Calif., 92708
(1)
(2)
(3)
DIC:TDlrT •v••"'-' "'"' ' -.v. 3
Special Meet ing
February 3, 1 9 7 2 -7 :30 p .m.
Roll Call
Appointment of Chairman pro tern , if necessary
Appointment of Georgia Cr abb as Secretary pro
(4) Consideration of Report of Special Committee
Studying Directors ' Fees Schedule . (Copy in
meeting folder)
"" ·--~~;: 0 onsideration of Resolution No . 72 -4-3 , approving
LETTER .... Ji .... ~lans and specifications for Knott Interceptor , ~
A;c ...... Tl<LR-:... a portion of Reach 1, and Reaches 2 and 3, Contract · /Vll s
....................... -No . 3-17; and authorizing advertising for bids on
........................ -March 9 , 1972, at 11:00 a .m. See pag e 11 A"
. .,,/" ( 6)
f L ~ ...... : .. ·7 ·--
lETIER .. v ...... ..
A/C .... TKLR .. ..
...........................
, ••••••••••••••••••••••• w.
fllE ... ~ .....
LETTER ... ~-~.?. )
A/C :-::-.TKLR ":::.
----
Consideration of Resolu t ion No . 72 -8-3, approvin g I
and authori z ing execution of Cooperative Agreement A 11 S
with Orange County Flood Control District involving ;v i
four F loo d Control Channel crossings pertaining to
con struction of Knott Interceptor, a portion of
Reach 1, and Reaches 2 and 3, Co n tract No . 3-17 .
See page "B 11
Consideration of Resolution No . 72-9 -3 , auth orizing I
and directing ex~cut i on and filing of documents · t
n ecessary for Federal Grant and State Grant on Knott ft/( S
I nt erceptor , a portion of Reach 1, and Reaches 2 , 3 ,
and 4 . See page "C"
(8) Consideration of motion to adjourn i ·''JO
HESOLUTION NO. 72-4 .:::3
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, A PORTION OF·
REACH 1 Arm REACHES 2 AND 3' CONTRACT
NOo 3-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIR;E:CTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, A PORTION
OF REACH 1 AND REACHES 2 AND 3, CONTRACT NOo 3-17
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No~ 3, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and
contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors
by Boyle Engineering, Districts' engineers, for construction of
KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, A PORTION OF REACH 1, AND ·REACHES 2 AND 3·,
CONTRACT NOo 3-17, are hereby approved and adopted; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed
to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions
of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and,
Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m.,
March 9, 1972, at which time said bids will be publicly
opened and read; and,
Section 4o That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts'
Engineers be authorized to open said bids of behalf of the Boards
of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a special meeting held February 3, 1972.
Agenda Item #5 -A-District 3
RESOLUTION NO. 72-8-3
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF f.... COOPERATIVE
AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
DISTRICT INVOLVING FOUR FLOOD CONTROL
CHANNEL CROSSEiGS PERTAINING TO CONSTRUCT.LON
OF KNOTT INTERCEPTOR
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3,. OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND.AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT· WITH ORANGE COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
* * * * * '* * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3,
of Orange County, California
·DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain agreement, Permit Application
No. 30471, dated , wherein ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT grants permit to District to construct the
Knott Interceptor, Contract No. 3-17, under various Flood
Control District facilities and rights of way, is hereby approved
and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District
are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED .at a special meeting held February 3,
1972.
Agenda Item #6 -B-District 3
.RESOL1YI' ION NO. 72-9-3
F'EDEHAL AirD S'l,ATE GRANTS -KNUI'T INTERCEPTOR4 A-POTITIOH OF REACH_ l~?._AiiD R_§:{\~!}_i~-~-g_LJ _ _L~~I2--
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATIOH ·DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORA~-TGE COU1'-ITY,
CALIFORNJ...A, AUTHORIZIHG AND DIRECTING EXECUTION
AND li1ILING 0~? DOCUNENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDER.r\L
GRANT UNDER 33 U.S. C., L~66 ET SEQ., AND STATE
GRANT UNDER CLEAN WATER BOND LAW OF 1970, IN
BEHALP OF COUrI'l'Y SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 3
AND 11, OF ORL\.TTGE COUNTY
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3,
of ~range County, California
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT:
Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 u.s.c., 466 et seq.) provides
for Federal g~ants for construction of sewage treatment works.
Section 2. The State Clean Water Jjond Law of 1970 authorizes
the State Water Resource~ Control" Board to enter into contracts with
public agencies for State grants. for construction of se~1age treatment
works.
Section 3. County Sanitation Distritt No. 3, of Orange County,
is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3,.
Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for the
purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer
system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other local
collection sewering agencies.
~
Sec.tion 4. County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County,
has heretofore entered into an agreement with County Sanitation District
·No. 11, of Orange County, whereby the two said Districts will share in
the cost of the construction of certain joint interceptor facilities
as said facilities and cost shares are set forth in said agreement.
Said agreement also provides that this District will construct and
operate said facilities and thereby is deemed to be the "Central Agency"
for said grant applications as set forth in the California Admini-
strative Code.
Agenda Item #7 C-1 District 3
Section 5. By means of Resolution No .. of County Sani-
.··;. District No .. 11, of Orange Count;,r~ and thi~ resolution,
· £·ization is granted for the filing of--8:PPlications .for grants
said Act of Congress and said Clean Water Bond ·Law for the
.,.,_1ction of. the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1, and
:S 2, 3, and 4.
Section 6. The General Manager is hereby authorized t~ prepare,
":1d submit, in behalf of County Sani ta ti on District No. 3 and
,· Sanitation District No. 11, all documents necessary to apply
-1 accept a construction grant under said Act of Congress and said
··later Bond La".1! for a joint project generally described as:
: __ #7
Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1,
and Reaches 2, 3, and 4.
C-2 District 3
II MANAGER'S AG ~N DA REP OR T
P. 0. Box 5 175
II
County Sani tation Districts
of Orange County, Californ ia
10844 .Ell i s Aven ue
Founta in Va ll ey, Ca l if., 92708
Teleph o n e~: ..
DIS TRICT NO. ~p_,. _
Speci a l Me~t i ng
··Thur sday _, Feb r uary 3 _, 197'2 ,, 7 :30 p .m.
Area Code 714
5 4 0 -29 10
962 -24 11
Chairman Hyde has c alled a special mee ting of the
Bo a r d o f Directors to c onside r the Report of the Special
Committee Studying the Di r ecto r s ' Fe e s Schedule and thr ee
othe r matters as des cribed be l ow :
Resolution No. 72 -4 -3 -Knot t Interceptor Sewe r_,
Contract No . 3 -17 . Action approving the plans and
s p ec i fications for the Knott Inter cepto r Sewe r was de -
f e rr ed at the January 1 2th meeting of the Board because
of some possible cons t ruction conflicts wi th the State
Di vision of Highwayso This matte r has now been resolved _,
a nd the plans and spe ci fications are ready for app r oval .
We recommend a bid date of Thursday _, Ma rch 9 _, 197 2 _, at
11:00 a .mo This projec t consists of t he install ation of
f i ve mi l es of 96 -inch diame ter reinforced concrete sewe r
fr om t he inter section of Ellis Avenue and Brookhurst Street
t o the inte r section of Bolsa Avenue and Newland·Street . The
p r eli mina r y estimated cost of the p r oject is $6 _,150 _,ooo _, for
wh ich we are hopeful of obtaining State and Federal grants
f o r a n as yet undetermined amount . District No . 11 will
pa r t i cipate i n 13 .7% of the project cost from the lower end
to t h e i nte r section of Slater Avenue and New l and Street .
· This interc eptor sewer c onfo rms c l osely to the adopted
1968 Mas t e r Plan of Sewerage Facilities i n District No . 3
a n d t he p l ans of Di s trict No . 11 .
Res olution No . 72 -8 -3 -We hav e worked out a cooperative
agr eement with the Orange County F l ood Contro l Di str ict to
c ombine the construction of fo u r Flood Control Channel cul -
v e rt s as a part of this contract . The agreement p r ovi des
f o r a lump sum payment by the F l ood Control District in the
am ount of $1_,800 fo r this addi tional work .
Res olu t ion No. 72 -9 -3 -Au t hori zes the fi l ing of an appli ca -
tion f or Federal and State c onstruct.ion grant monies on the
Kn ott I nt ercept o r Sewe r.
F r e d A. Ha r per
Ge neral Manager
I
I
l·1eeti1~G Devte ~ ... 3 .... 72..
DIST?..ICI1 l
Gris et
Battin
Miller
Porter
nrsTRICT 2
~ Smith
Christie
Clark, Robt. -
Culver --
Finnell
Herrin
Just
Phillips
Sims
Stephenson --
Wedaa
Winn
Herrin
Caspers
Coco
Hileman
Root
Jackson
Gomez
Gris et
Harper
Caspers
Zuniga
Dutton
Machado
Schniepp
-DISTRICT 3 · ~
eyde ~ Kroesen
Battin ~ Caspers
Berton Westra
Christie Root
Clark,Robt. 1//ackson
~~;r~r i ·Fonte
Green McCracken
Harper ~ Just
Harvey ~ Kanel
·Herrin ~ Griset Hemeo~~ Lewis
Holden ~ Barnes \ iH;::::n z-~~~~~
DISTRICT 5
Parsons
Caspers
Hirth
DISTRICT 6
Porter
Caspers
. Mcinnis
DISTRICT 7
Miller
Clark, RalplL._
Fischbach
Griset
Porter
Rogers
r· ith
~-DISTRICT 11
Si1ipley
Baker
Coen
DISTHICT 8
Boyd
Caspers
1.atchell
Croul
Hirth
Coco
Caspers
Quigley
Herrin
Hirth
Hileman
~·~C C;rac ken
Caspers
Goldberg
Ti~::e Z ~o (J! Jt.1 Districts
-·-·
·--
JOINT BOAF..DS
Just
Baker
Ba·ttin
Berton
Caspers
Harper
=Caspers
__ Caspers
Westra
Christie --Root
Clark, Robt .--~ackson
.Clark, Ralpn--Caspers
Coen -
Culver
Davis ..
Finnell
Fischbach
Green
Griset
Harper
Harvey
Hemeon
Herrin
Hirth
Holden
Hyde
Mc Innis
McWhinney.
--Fonte
--Gomez
--McCracken
Herrin
-Just
-Kanel
--Lewis
-Griset
--croul
--Bogard
-Kroesen
--Hirth
Miller ---coco
Parsons
Phillips --caspers
Porter
Rogers --nirth
Shipley --McCracken
Sims ---zuniga
Smith ~Hileman
Stephenson --Dutton
Wedaa ---Machado
Winn --schniepp
* * *
Mite.hell
Boyd :==Goldberg
OTHERS
Harper
Brown
Sylvester
Lewis
. Dunn
Clarke
Sigler
Crabb
Carlson
Finster
Galloway
Hohener
Hunt
Kej_th
Lowry'
Maddox
Martin.son
Niss on
Piersall
Stevens
Neetine Date .:J.-;J_ ?~
DrsrrP.ICT 1
Gris et
Battin
Miller
Porter
DISTRICT 2
~ith
Christie
Clark, Robt.--
Culver --
Finnell
Herrin
Just
Phillips
Sims
Stephenson --
Wedaa
Winn ,----
\
j DISTRICT 3
IiYcte L
· Battin t-/
Berton _.\L_
Christie _iL
Clark, Robt._~_
Culver ~
Davis -/
Green -;;:r
Harper J
Harvey V-
·Herrin V-
Hemeon v
Holden -V--
McWhinney ~
llUS .
ephenson V
DISTRICT 5
Far sons
Caspers
Hirth
DISTRICT 6
Porter
Caspers
. Mcinnis
DISTRICT 7
Miller
Clark, RalplL._
Fischbach
Gris et.
Porter.
Rogers
p--~i th
...,.~.
DISTRICT 11 ·-------
Baker
Coen
DISTRICT 8
Bo:yd
Caspers
1111 tcb.211
Herrin
Caspers
Coco
Hileman
Root
Jackson
Gome.z
Gris et
Harper
Caspers
Zuniga
Dutton
Mac·hado
Schniepp
Kroesen 1 ·
Caspers
Westra
Root
Jackson
·Fonte
McCracken
Just
Kanel
Gris et
Lewis
Barnes
Zuniga
Dutton.
Croul ·
Hirth
Coco
Caspers
Quigley
Herrin
Hirth
Hileman
i-~cCracken
Caspers
Goldberg
Districts 3..
·JOINT BOA?.DS
Just
Baker
Battin
Berton
Caspers
Harper
Caspers
Caspers
--Westra
Christie --Root
Clark, Robt.--~ackson
Clark,Ralpn---Caspers
Coen --
Culver
Davis.
Finnell
Fischbach
Green
Gris et
Harper
Harvey
Hemeon
Herrin
Hirth
Holden
Hyde
Mc Innis
McWhinney
Miller
Parsons
--Fonte
-Gomez
--McCracken
--Herrin
--Just
-Kanel
--Lewis
--Gris et
--croul
--Hogard
-Kroes en
--Hirth
--coco
Phillips . -caspers
Porter
Rogers -Hirth
Shipley --McCracken
Sims ---zuniga
Smith -~Hileman
--. Stephenson --Dutton
Wedaa --Machado
Winn --schniepp
* * *
Mite-hell
Boyd :==Goldberg
OT!IERS
Harper
Brovm
Sylvester
Lewis
Dunn
Clarke
Sigler
Crabb
Carlson
Finster
Galloway
Hohener
Hunt
Keith
Lowry
Maddox
Martin.son
Ni,sson
Piersall
Stevens
·.
•·
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO LIMIT
DIRECTORS' FEES FOR ATTENDING
CURRENT MEETINGS OF TWO OR MORE
DISTRICTS .
Rather than attempt to amend Section 4733, it is
.believed a new section should be prop~sed to take care
of this special situation to read as fQllows:
"Health & Safety Code, Section 4733.5: Power of Board
to Limit Compensation of Members for Attendance at Joint
Meetings
Where two or more county sanitation districts have
joined in the purchase, ownership, use, construction,
maintenance, or operation of a sewerage system, or sewage
disposal or treatment plant, or refuse transfer or disposal
system, or both, either 'within or without the districts, or
have so joined for any combination of these purposes, as
provided in Section 4742, and the districts hold their
meetings jointly, and one or more of the directors serve
as a director on more than one of such districts meeting
jointly, the districts may, by joint resolution approved
by each district, limit the compensation of such a direc-
tor to compensation equal to not more than $50 for each
jointly held meeting attended by him not to exceed $100
in any one month for attendance at jointly held meetings."
With reference to pay for the joint chairman, an amend-
ment ·to Section 4734 could be proposed by adding thereto the
following:
· ."; provided, however, the maximum compensation to be
paid such joint chairman shall not exceed $250 per month."
J"
Agenda Item No. / { No'vember 5~ 1971
MEMORANDUM
TO: EDWARD JUST, JOINT CHAIRMAN
FROM: ROBERT FINNELL, CHAIRMAN, SPECIAL COMMI'ITEE STUDYING
DIRECTORS' FEES SCHEDULE
·SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION FOR CHANGES IN THE PRESENT DIRECTORS'
FEES SCHEDULE
The following report constitutes the recommendations of the
special committee appointed by the Joint Boards at the regular
board meeting of March 10, 1971.
During this period t~e committee has met on a number of
occasions and has requested and received detailed information
from both the Sanitation Districts' staff and the Districts'
General Counsel. The committee has reviewed several alternatives
which are discussed below.
(1) Maintain the Directors' compensation at the
present level as established by resolution of
the individual Districts in 1967 and 1968.
The special committee concluded that the ·
present fee structure is inequitable and
that another alternative should be sought.
(~) Amend the fee schedule so that those Directors
representing more than one District at a joint
meeting would only receive compensation equal
to that of a Director representing a single
District.
The General Counsel ruled that under the present
Health and Safety Code the Sanitation District
does not have the authority to discriminate in
its fees. This alternative could be achieved,
however, by requesting the State Legislature to
enact special legislation. It was the consensus
of the special committee that because such legis-
lation would affect all sanitation districts in
the State of California, the chances of securing
passage of such legislation w~re slim. It was
also agreed that even if such legislation coul~
be enacted it would be time consuming and would
not solve other problems which will be facing the
Districts in the near future.
(3)
The special committee does recommend, ·however,
that if the Joint Boards do not agree with the
committee's recommended alternative, serious
consideration should be given to requesting
legislative action to accomplish the reduction
of multiple fees to a single Director.
Consolidate the various Sanitation Districts
into one County Sanitation District with opera-
tions, maintenance, and capi ta.l outlay costs
split evenly throughout ·the new District.
·while this would achieve many of the goals the
committee felt were needed, it would create
tax increases in Districts 5, 6, and 7, while
·1owering taxes in Districts 1, 3, and 11. It
would have no effect on District 2. The Com-
mittee concluded that this would not be an
equitable distribution of costs and therefore
does not recommend this alternative.
(4) Consolidate the present Sanitation Districts
into one County Sanitation District with
special zones which would be co-terminus with
existing Districts' boundaries and it would
have separate budgets, could issue bonds, and
incur bonded indebtedness for improvements and
the maintenance thereof within the special zone.
. .
In effect, this alternative would provide for
only one Sanitation District but would allow
for special zones which would be the equivalent
of the present County Sanitation Districts which
would have no effect on the tax rates of each
of the present Districts. The consolidated
agencies would act as a single Sanitation District
now acts. The existing Joint Administrative
Organization would be eliminated as would the
necessity for seven sets of resolutions, minutes,
seals, etc., for joint business. Rather than
having District No. 1 act as agent for all the
Districts it would merely be one District. There
would be no duplication of Directors in that each
city within the District, each Sanitary District
now represented, and the County Board of Super~
visors, would have a single representative and
an alternate for a total of 23 active Directors.
The committee felt that this latter point was
one which deserved special attention of the
Joint Boards. At the present time there are
-2-
29 Directors representing 19 cities and 3
Sanitary Districts and the County Board of
Supervisors. However, if Districts No. 5
and No. 11 annex presently unincorporated
areas, the entire city councils of the
Cities of Newport Beach and Huntington Beach
will automatically become the Board of
Directors for those two Sanitation Districts.
This will increase the nwnber of Directors
to 36 with two cities having 14 representa-
tives voting on matters before the Joint
Boards. In addition, if each of the mayors
of cities belonging to more than one District
should elect a different alternate to repre-
sent them in each District, the number of
Directors could go as high as 48. This would
more than double the number of Directors which
would be possible under this proposed alter-
native. The committee felt that the unwieldy
nature of such a large Board would be detri-
mental to the efficient operations of the
Districts.
This alternative would also have the effect
of substantially reducing the number of
special districts, an objective formally
endorsed by the Orange County Board of
Supervisors, the Orange County Division of
the Lea·gue of California Ci ties, and the ·
Orange County Grand Jury. At the same time,
it would still provide the mechanism for
solving local problems by providing for zone
committees equivalent to the present Districts'
Boards.
Last but certainly not least, the reduction
in Directors fees would amount to a sub-
stantial savings to the taxpayers of the
Districts.
The committee recommends the adoption of this
alternate plan. It has prepared for the re-
view of each Director, a proposed consolidation
agreement. It is recommended that this item
-3-
•
be placed on the December 8, ig71 ~gerida
~ ror a discussion and vote by ~he membership
of the Joint Boards.
Respectfully submitted,
1)/ J J JJc // ]//}.{)( 7, ~#??£~ .
Rooert Finnell
Chairman·
Members of the Special Committee:
Chairman:
Members:
~
Robert Finnell, 1.~ayor
City of Placentia
Joseph Eyde_, Councilman
City of Los Alamitos
Lindsl~y Parsc~s, Counci~rean
City of Newport Beach
Don Smith, !.!ayor
City of Orange
Mark Stephenson, Council:nan
City of Anaheim
Ex officio Members: C. Arthur Nissan·, General Counse~
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Edward Just, Joint Chair~an
.Orange County Sanitation Districts
..
,
-4-
0
on
AGREEMENT FOR CONSOLIDATION
DRAFT
9/29/71
This Agreement made in Fountain Valley, California,
---day of ~~~~--~~-' 19~-' by and between
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOSo 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11,
OF ORANGE COUNTY (each hereinafter referred to collectively
as "Districts").
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, Districts are organized and existing
under the provisions of. the_ County Sanitation Distric~ Act
(Section 4700, et seq. of the Health & Safety Code), and
WHEREAS, Districts are each engaged in.the collection,
transporting and disposal of sewage and industrial wastes
originating wi~h the County of Orange, and
WHEREAS, Districts jointly own and operate property
used for the treatment and disposal of sewage and industrial
was~es, and
WHEREAS, each District serves a different territory of
the County of Orange and owns certain sewerage facilities
independent of each other· District, and
WHEREAS, the territory of all districts together
constitute a contiguous territory, and . .
WHEREAS, by agreement districts maintain a single
joint administrative organization w~ich administers all of
the affairs of each districts, and
WHEREAS, by reason of assessed valuations, varying
states of development and land uses, each district has
different requirements for funding its operations, and
WHEREAS, many administrative benefits can be derived
from a consolidation of all districts into a single county
sanitation district, and
WHEREAS, the County Sanitation District Act provides
for the maintenance of zones within a single county san~tation
district (Health & Safety Code, Section 4850-4856, inclusive)
which can be maintained to keep existing tax burdens in
similar proportions upon consolidation of the districts.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and
'
the agreeme~ts set forth hereinafter, it is ag·reed as follows:
1. That the districts will petition for consolidation
into one county sanitation district ~hose territory w~ll
include all of the territory now contained within their respec-.
tive territorial boundaries.
2. The consolidation district, hereinafter called
--~~~~~~~~-
, will be known as
3. When formed, will be divided into zones
as authorized under the provisions of Health & Safety Code,
Section 4850-4856, inclusive. Said zones will be coterminous
with existing boundaries of each district and sub-committees
of the directors will be created to recommend to the whole
board of directors the special improvements and tax requirements
for each zone. Each sub-committee shall include the directors
whose constituencies.are significantly included within the
zone they are to be concerned with.
4. In determining the revenues needed for each
zone within as provide~ in Health & Safety Code,
Section 4856, the directors shall calculate the requirements
for each zone insofar as the operation of is dis-
tinguished from the special sewerage facilities constructed,
maintained and operated to serve the localized requirements
of the zones in accordance with the joint ownership, operation
and construction agreement dated March 10, 1971, now existing
by and between the districts, parties to this agreement;
5. The expressed intent of this agreement is to
provide the means to maintain the existing proportions of the
tax burden on the property within e~ch district to be included
in the newly consolidated ' --~~~~~
•
RESOLUTION NO. 72-8-3
AUTHORIZING EXECU'l1ION OF A COOPERATIVE
AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
DISTRICT INVOLVING FOUR FLOOD CONTROL
CHANNEL CROSSINGS PER'l1AINING 11.10 CO_N_S-'11_R_U_C_T_l_O_N
OF KNOTT INTERCEPTOR
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA_, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
* * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3,
of Orange County, California
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain agreement, Permit Application
No. 30471, dated , wherein ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT grants permit to District to construct the
Knott Interceptor, Contract No. 3-17, under various Flood
Control District facilities and rights of way, is hereby approved
and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District
are.hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED .at a special. meeting held February 3,
1972.
---=-
RESOLUTION NO. 72-9-3
FEDEHAL AHD Sri1 h'l'E GRAWI:S -Krmrl.1111 IN'l1ERCEPTOR
A ~POTITIOH OF REACH 1, AND HEACHES 2, 3, AND l~ -------~----~--··-----·----.. ~--
A RESOLUTION OF' TffE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTHICT NO. 3, 01? ORA~·TGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIREC11 ING EXECUTION
AND FILING OE' DOClJ1·1EN1J~S NECESSARY F'OR F'EDERAL
GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C., 466 ET SEQ., AND STATE
GRANT UNDER CLEAN WA'I1ER BOND LAW OF 1970, IN
BEHALP OF COUrJ111Y SANITATION DISTRICrl'S NOS. 3
AND 11, OF ORL\NGE COUNTY
The Board of birectors of County Sanitatiori District No. 3,
of Orange County, California
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETE.."RMINE AND ORDER THAT:
Section 1. An Act of Congress kno11m as the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as amended ( 33 U.S. C., 466 et .seq. ) provides
for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works.
Section 2. The State Clean T1Tater Bond Law of 1970 authorizes
the State Water Resources Contror Board to enter into contracts with
public agencies for State grants: for construction of se'lmge treatment
works.
Section 3. County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County,
is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3,
Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for the
purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer
system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other local
collection sewering agencies .
...
Sec:tion 4. County Sanitation Dist!ict No. 3, of Orange County,
has heretofore entered into an agreement with County Sanitation Distric·t
·No. 11, of Orange County, whereby the two said Districts will share in
the cost of the construction of certain joint interceptor facilities
~ as said facilities and cost shares are set forth in said ~greement.
Said agreement also provides tha~ this District will construct and
operate satd facilities and" thereby is deemed to be the "Central Agency"
. ..·
for said grant applications· as set forth in the California Admini-
strative Code.
. .
. . .
Section_2. By means of Resolution No. of County San:L~
tation District No. 11, of Orange County, nnd this resolution,
authorization is granted for thE; filing of 8:PPlicatj_ons for grants
.under said Act _of Congress and said Clean Water Bond Law for the
construction of the Knott Interceptor, a. Portion of Reach 1, and
Reaches 2, 3, and l~.
Section 6. The General Manager is hereby authorized to prepare,
sign and submit, in behalf of County Sanitation District No. 3 and
County Sani ta ti on District No. 11, all docmnents necessary to apply
for and accept a construction grant under said Ac"t1 of Congress and.said
Clean Water Bond Law for a joint project generally described as:
Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1,
and Reaches 2, 3, and 4 .
•
.-·~