Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972-02-03.- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF · ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFO~NI_A - TELILPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 9 6 2-2411 I P . 0 . BOX 8 1 27, FOUNTAIN VALLEY. C ALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLI D O FF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) Ge ntl emen : January 28, 1972 NOTICE OF SPEC I AL MEETING DI STR I CT NO . 3 ·Thursday , 7 :30 p .m., February 3 , 1972 10844 Ellis Avenu e Fo untain Valley , Cal i fo rnia I am calling a special meeting of the Boa rd of Direc t o rs of County Sanitat i on Di stri ct Ho . 3 a t the above hour and d a t e to conside r the following : 1. Consideration of Report of Special Corrunittee Studying Directors 1 Fees Schedule . Copy attached . 2. Consideiation of Resolution No . 72 -4-3, approvj.ng pl a11s and specifications for K.nott Interceptor, a portion of Reach 1, and Reaches 2 and 3, Contract No . 3-17 ; and authorizing advert i sing for bids on March 9 , 1972 , at 11 :00 a .m. See attache d. 3 . Cons i d e r a tion of Resolution No . 72 -8 -3 , approvin g and authorizing execution of Cooperative Ag r eement . ,. with Orange County Flood Co ntrol Di st ri ct involving fou r Flood Control Channel crossings pertaining to construction of K_.nott Interceptor, a. portion of Reach 1 , and Reaches 2 and 3 , Contract No . 3 -17 . See attached . 4. Cons ide r ation of Resolution No . 72 -9-3 , authorizing and d i recting execution and fil ing of docu.rnents n ecessar~' f or Federal Grant and State Gr ant on JW S :gc Kn o t t In tercepto r, a portion of Reach 1, and Reac h es 2, 3 , and 4 . See attached . / BO A'.105 OF Dlr:!E CT ORS Cou nt y Sanitation Dist ri cts P. 0 . Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 f:llis Avenue Fountain Va ll ey, Calif., 92708 (1) (2) (3) DIC:TDlrT •v••"'-' "'"' ' -.v. 3 Special Meet ing February 3, 1 9 7 2 -7 :30 p .m. Roll Call Appointment of Chairman pro tern , if necessary Appointment of Georgia Cr abb as Secretary pro (4) Consideration of Report of Special Committee Studying Directors ' Fees Schedule . (Copy in meeting folder) "" ·--~~;: 0 onsideration of Resolution No . 72 -4-3 , approving LETTER .... Ji .... ~lans and specifications for Knott Interceptor , ~ A;c ...... Tl<LR-:... a portion of Reach 1, and Reaches 2 and 3, Contract · /Vll s ....................... -No . 3-17; and authorizing advertising for bids on ........................ -March 9 , 1972, at 11:00 a .m. See pag e 11 A" . .,,/" ( 6) f L ~ ...... : .. ·7 ·-- lETIER .. v ...... .. A/C .... TKLR .. .. ........................... , ••••••••••••••••••••••• w. fllE ... ~ ..... LETTER ... ~-~.?. ) A/C :-::-.TKLR ":::. ---- Consideration of Resolu t ion No . 72 -8-3, approvin g I and authori z ing execution of Cooperative Agreement A 11 S with Orange County Flood Control District involving ;v i four F loo d Control Channel crossings pertaining to con struction of Knott Interceptor, a portion of Reach 1, and Reaches 2 and 3, Co n tract No . 3-17 . See page "B 11 Consideration of Resolution No . 72-9 -3 , auth orizing I and directing ex~cut i on and filing of documents · t n ecessary for Federal Grant and State Grant on Knott ft/( S I nt erceptor , a portion of Reach 1, and Reaches 2 , 3 , and 4 . See page "C" (8) Consideration of motion to adjourn i ·''JO HESOLUTION NO. 72-4 .:::3 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, A PORTION OF· REACH 1 Arm REACHES 2 AND 3' CONTRACT NOo 3-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIR;E:CTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, A PORTION OF REACH 1 AND REACHES 2 AND 3, CONTRACT NOo 3-17 * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No~ 3, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Boyle Engineering, Districts' engineers, for construction of KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, A PORTION OF REACH 1, AND ·REACHES 2 AND 3·, CONTRACT NOo 3-17, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m., March 9, 1972, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4o That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' Engineers be authorized to open said bids of behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a special meeting held February 3, 1972. Agenda Item #5 -A-District 3 RESOLUTION NO. 72-8-3 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF f.... COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT INVOLVING FOUR FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL CROSSEiGS PERTAINING TO CONSTRUCT.LON OF KNOTT INTERCEPTOR A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3,. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND.AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT· WITH ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT * * * * * '* * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California ·DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement, Permit Application No. 30471, dated , wherein ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT grants permit to District to construct the Knott Interceptor, Contract No. 3-17, under various Flood Control District facilities and rights of way, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED .at a special meeting held February 3, 1972. Agenda Item #6 -B-District 3 .RESOL1YI' ION NO. 72-9-3 F'EDEHAL AirD S'l,ATE GRANTS -KNUI'T INTERCEPTOR4 A-POTITIOH OF REACH_ l~?._AiiD R_§:{\~!}_i~-~-g_LJ _ _L~~I2-- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATIOH ·DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORA~-TGE COU1'-ITY, CALIFORNJ...A, AUTHORIZIHG AND DIRECTING EXECUTION AND li1ILING 0~? DOCUNENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDER.r\L GRANT UNDER 33 U.S. C., L~66 ET SEQ., AND STATE GRANT UNDER CLEAN WATER BOND LAW OF 1970, IN BEHALP OF COUrI'l'Y SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 3 AND 11, OF ORL\.TTGE COUNTY The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of ~range County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT: Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 u.s.c., 466 et seq.) provides for Federal g~ants for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 2. The State Clean Water Jjond Law of 1970 authorizes the State Water Resource~ Control" Board to enter into contracts with public agencies for State grants. for construction of se~1age treatment works. Section 3. County Sanitation Distritt No. 3, of Orange County, is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3,. Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other local collection sewering agencies. ~ Sec.tion 4. County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, has heretofore entered into an agreement with County Sanitation District ·No. 11, of Orange County, whereby the two said Districts will share in the cost of the construction of certain joint interceptor facilities as said facilities and cost shares are set forth in said agreement. Said agreement also provides that this District will construct and operate said facilities and thereby is deemed to be the "Central Agency" for said grant applications as set forth in the California Admini- strative Code. Agenda Item #7 C-1 District 3 Section 5. By means of Resolution No .. of County Sani- .··;. District No .. 11, of Orange Count;,r~ and thi~ resolution, · £·ization is granted for the filing of--8:PPlications .for grants said Act of Congress and said Clean Water Bond ·Law for the .,.,_1ction of. the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1, and :S 2, 3, and 4. Section 6. The General Manager is hereby authorized t~ prepare, ":1d submit, in behalf of County Sani ta ti on District No. 3 and ,· Sanitation District No. 11, all documents necessary to apply -1 accept a construction grant under said Act of Congress and said ··later Bond La".1! for a joint project generally described as: : __ #7 Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1, and Reaches 2, 3, and 4. C-2 District 3 II MANAGER'S AG ~N DA REP OR T P. 0. Box 5 175 II County Sani tation Districts of Orange County, Californ ia 10844 .Ell i s Aven ue Founta in Va ll ey, Ca l if., 92708 Teleph o n e~: .. DIS TRICT NO. ~p_,. _ Speci a l Me~t i ng ··Thur sday _, Feb r uary 3 _, 197'2 ,, 7 :30 p .m. Area Code 714 5 4 0 -29 10 962 -24 11 Chairman Hyde has c alled a special mee ting of the Bo a r d o f Directors to c onside r the Report of the Special Committee Studying the Di r ecto r s ' Fe e s Schedule and thr ee othe r matters as des cribed be l ow : Resolution No. 72 -4 -3 -Knot t Interceptor Sewe r_, Contract No . 3 -17 . Action approving the plans and s p ec i fications for the Knott Inter cepto r Sewe r was de - f e rr ed at the January 1 2th meeting of the Board because of some possible cons t ruction conflicts wi th the State Di vision of Highwayso This matte r has now been resolved _, a nd the plans and spe ci fications are ready for app r oval . We recommend a bid date of Thursday _, Ma rch 9 _, 197 2 _, at 11:00 a .mo This projec t consists of t he install ation of f i ve mi l es of 96 -inch diame ter reinforced concrete sewe r fr om t he inter section of Ellis Avenue and Brookhurst Street t o the inte r section of Bolsa Avenue and Newland·Street . The p r eli mina r y estimated cost of the p r oject is $6 _,150 _,ooo _, for wh ich we are hopeful of obtaining State and Federal grants f o r a n as yet undetermined amount . District No . 11 will pa r t i cipate i n 13 .7% of the project cost from the lower end to t h e i nte r section of Slater Avenue and New l and Street . · This interc eptor sewer c onfo rms c l osely to the adopted 1968 Mas t e r Plan of Sewerage Facilities i n District No . 3 a n d t he p l ans of Di s trict No . 11 . Res olution No . 72 -8 -3 -We hav e worked out a cooperative agr eement with the Orange County F l ood Contro l Di str ict to c ombine the construction of fo u r Flood Control Channel cul - v e rt s as a part of this contract . The agreement p r ovi des f o r a lump sum payment by the F l ood Control District in the am ount of $1_,800 fo r this addi tional work . Res olu t ion No. 72 -9 -3 -Au t hori zes the fi l ing of an appli ca - tion f or Federal and State c onstruct.ion grant monies on the Kn ott I nt ercept o r Sewe r. F r e d A. Ha r per Ge neral Manager I I l·1eeti1~G Devte ~ ... 3 .... 72.. DIST?..ICI1 l Gris et Battin Miller Porter nrsTRICT 2 ~ Smith Christie Clark, Robt. - Culver -- Finnell Herrin Just Phillips Sims Stephenson -- Wedaa Winn Herrin Caspers Coco Hileman Root Jackson Gomez Gris et Harper Caspers Zuniga Dutton Machado Schniepp -DISTRICT 3 · ~ eyde ~ Kroesen Battin ~ Caspers Berton Westra Christie Root Clark,Robt. 1//ackson ~~;r~r i ·Fonte Green McCracken Harper ~ Just Harvey ~ Kanel ·Herrin ~ Griset Hemeo~~ Lewis Holden ~ Barnes \ iH;::::n z-~~~~~ DISTRICT 5 Parsons Caspers Hirth DISTRICT 6 Porter Caspers . Mcinnis DISTRICT 7 Miller Clark, RalplL._ Fischbach Griset Porter Rogers r· ith ~-DISTRICT 11 Si1ipley Baker Coen DISTHICT 8 Boyd Caspers 1.atchell Croul Hirth Coco Caspers Quigley Herrin Hirth Hileman ~·~C C;rac ken Caspers Goldberg Ti~::e Z ~o (J! Jt.1 Districts -·-· ·-- JOINT BOAF..DS Just Baker Ba·ttin Berton Caspers Harper =Caspers __ Caspers Westra Christie --Root Clark, Robt .--~ackson .Clark, Ralpn--Caspers Coen - Culver Davis .. Finnell Fischbach Green Griset Harper Harvey Hemeon Herrin Hirth Holden Hyde Mc Innis McWhinney. --Fonte --Gomez --McCracken Herrin -Just -Kanel --Lewis -Griset --croul --Bogard -Kroesen --Hirth Miller ---coco Parsons Phillips --caspers Porter Rogers --nirth Shipley --McCracken Sims ---zuniga Smith ~Hileman Stephenson --Dutton Wedaa ---Machado Winn --schniepp * * * Mite.hell Boyd :==Goldberg OTHERS Harper Brown Sylvester Lewis . Dunn Clarke Sigler Crabb Carlson Finster Galloway Hohener Hunt Kej_th Lowry' Maddox Martin.son Niss on Piersall Stevens Neetine Date .:J.-;J_ ?~ DrsrrP.ICT 1 Gris et Battin Miller Porter DISTRICT 2 ~ith Christie Clark, Robt.-- Culver -- Finnell Herrin Just Phillips Sims Stephenson -- Wedaa Winn ,---- \ j DISTRICT 3 IiYcte L · Battin t-/ Berton _.\L_ Christie _iL Clark, Robt._~_ Culver ~ Davis -/ Green -;;:r Harper J Harvey V- ·Herrin V- Hemeon v Holden -V-- McWhinney ~ llUS . ephenson V DISTRICT 5 Far sons Caspers Hirth DISTRICT 6 Porter Caspers . Mcinnis DISTRICT 7 Miller Clark, RalplL._ Fischbach Gris et. Porter. Rogers p--~i th ...,.~. DISTRICT 11 ·------- Baker Coen DISTRICT 8 Bo:yd Caspers 1111 tcb.211 Herrin Caspers Coco Hileman Root Jackson Gome.z Gris et Harper Caspers Zuniga Dutton Mac·hado Schniepp Kroesen 1 · Caspers Westra Root Jackson ·Fonte McCracken Just Kanel Gris et Lewis Barnes Zuniga Dutton. Croul · Hirth Coco Caspers Quigley Herrin Hirth Hileman i-~cCracken Caspers Goldberg Districts 3.. ·JOINT BOA?.DS Just Baker Battin Berton Caspers Harper Caspers Caspers --Westra Christie --Root Clark, Robt.--~ackson Clark,Ralpn---Caspers Coen -- Culver Davis. Finnell Fischbach Green Gris et Harper Harvey Hemeon Herrin Hirth Holden Hyde Mc Innis McWhinney Miller Parsons --Fonte -Gomez --McCracken --Herrin --Just -Kanel --Lewis --Gris et --croul --Hogard -Kroes en --Hirth --coco Phillips . -caspers Porter Rogers -Hirth Shipley --McCracken Sims ---zuniga Smith -~Hileman --. Stephenson --Dutton Wedaa --Machado Winn --schniepp * * * Mite-hell Boyd :==Goldberg OT!IERS Harper Brovm Sylvester Lewis Dunn Clarke Sigler Crabb Carlson Finster Galloway Hohener Hunt Keith Lowry Maddox Martin.son Ni,sson Piersall Stevens ·. •· PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO LIMIT DIRECTORS' FEES FOR ATTENDING CURRENT MEETINGS OF TWO OR MORE DISTRICTS . Rather than attempt to amend Section 4733, it is .believed a new section should be prop~sed to take care of this special situation to read as fQllows: "Health & Safety Code, Section 4733.5: Power of Board to Limit Compensation of Members for Attendance at Joint Meetings Where two or more county sanitation districts have joined in the purchase, ownership, use, construction, maintenance, or operation of a sewerage system, or sewage disposal or treatment plant, or refuse transfer or disposal system, or both, either 'within or without the districts, or have so joined for any combination of these purposes, as provided in Section 4742, and the districts hold their meetings jointly, and one or more of the directors serve as a director on more than one of such districts meeting jointly, the districts may, by joint resolution approved by each district, limit the compensation of such a direc- tor to compensation equal to not more than $50 for each jointly held meeting attended by him not to exceed $100 in any one month for attendance at jointly held meetings." With reference to pay for the joint chairman, an amend- ment ·to Section 4734 could be proposed by adding thereto the following: · ."; provided, however, the maximum compensation to be paid such joint chairman shall not exceed $250 per month." J" Agenda Item No. / { No'vember 5~ 1971 MEMORANDUM TO: EDWARD JUST, JOINT CHAIRMAN FROM: ROBERT FINNELL, CHAIRMAN, SPECIAL COMMI'ITEE STUDYING DIRECTORS' FEES SCHEDULE ·SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION FOR CHANGES IN THE PRESENT DIRECTORS' FEES SCHEDULE The following report constitutes the recommendations of the special committee appointed by the Joint Boards at the regular board meeting of March 10, 1971. During this period t~e committee has met on a number of occasions and has requested and received detailed information from both the Sanitation Districts' staff and the Districts' General Counsel. The committee has reviewed several alternatives which are discussed below. (1) Maintain the Directors' compensation at the present level as established by resolution of the individual Districts in 1967 and 1968. The special committee concluded that the · present fee structure is inequitable and that another alternative should be sought. (~) Amend the fee schedule so that those Directors representing more than one District at a joint meeting would only receive compensation equal to that of a Director representing a single District. The General Counsel ruled that under the present Health and Safety Code the Sanitation District does not have the authority to discriminate in its fees. This alternative could be achieved, however, by requesting the State Legislature to enact special legislation. It was the consensus of the special committee that because such legis- lation would affect all sanitation districts in the State of California, the chances of securing passage of such legislation w~re slim. It was also agreed that even if such legislation coul~ be enacted it would be time consuming and would not solve other problems which will be facing the Districts in the near future. (3) The special committee does recommend, ·however, that if the Joint Boards do not agree with the committee's recommended alternative, serious consideration should be given to requesting legislative action to accomplish the reduction of multiple fees to a single Director. Consolidate the various Sanitation Districts into one County Sanitation District with opera- tions, maintenance, and capi ta.l outlay costs split evenly throughout ·the new District. ·while this would achieve many of the goals the committee felt were needed, it would create tax increases in Districts 5, 6, and 7, while ·1owering taxes in Districts 1, 3, and 11. It would have no effect on District 2. The Com- mittee concluded that this would not be an equitable distribution of costs and therefore does not recommend this alternative. (4) Consolidate the present Sanitation Districts into one County Sanitation District with special zones which would be co-terminus with existing Districts' boundaries and it would have separate budgets, could issue bonds, and incur bonded indebtedness for improvements and the maintenance thereof within the special zone. . . In effect, this alternative would provide for only one Sanitation District but would allow for special zones which would be the equivalent of the present County Sanitation Districts which would have no effect on the tax rates of each of the present Districts. The consolidated agencies would act as a single Sanitation District now acts. The existing Joint Administrative Organization would be eliminated as would the necessity for seven sets of resolutions, minutes, seals, etc., for joint business. Rather than having District No. 1 act as agent for all the Districts it would merely be one District. There would be no duplication of Directors in that each city within the District, each Sanitary District now represented, and the County Board of Super~ visors, would have a single representative and an alternate for a total of 23 active Directors. The committee felt that this latter point was one which deserved special attention of the Joint Boards. At the present time there are -2- 29 Directors representing 19 cities and 3 Sanitary Districts and the County Board of Supervisors. However, if Districts No. 5 and No. 11 annex presently unincorporated areas, the entire city councils of the Cities of Newport Beach and Huntington Beach will automatically become the Board of Directors for those two Sanitation Districts. This will increase the nwnber of Directors to 36 with two cities having 14 representa- tives voting on matters before the Joint Boards. In addition, if each of the mayors of cities belonging to more than one District should elect a different alternate to repre- sent them in each District, the number of Directors could go as high as 48. This would more than double the number of Directors which would be possible under this proposed alter- native. The committee felt that the unwieldy nature of such a large Board would be detri- mental to the efficient operations of the Districts. This alternative would also have the effect of substantially reducing the number of special districts, an objective formally endorsed by the Orange County Board of Supervisors, the Orange County Division of the Lea·gue of California Ci ties, and the · Orange County Grand Jury. At the same time, it would still provide the mechanism for solving local problems by providing for zone committees equivalent to the present Districts' Boards. Last but certainly not least, the reduction in Directors fees would amount to a sub- stantial savings to the taxpayers of the Districts. The committee recommends the adoption of this alternate plan. It has prepared for the re- view of each Director, a proposed consolidation agreement. It is recommended that this item -3- • be placed on the December 8, ig71 ~gerida ~ ror a discussion and vote by ~he membership of the Joint Boards. Respectfully submitted, 1)/ J J JJc // ]//}.{)( 7, ~#??£~ . Rooert Finnell Chairman· Members of the Special Committee: Chairman: Members: ~ Robert Finnell, 1.~ayor City of Placentia Joseph Eyde_, Councilman City of Los Alamitos Lindsl~y Parsc~s, Counci~rean City of Newport Beach Don Smith, !.!ayor City of Orange Mark Stephenson, Council:nan City of Anaheim Ex officio Members: C. Arthur Nissan·, General Counse~ Orange County Sanitation Districts Edward Just, Joint Chair~an .Orange County Sanitation Districts .. , -4- 0 on AGREEMENT FOR CONSOLIDATION DRAFT 9/29/71 This Agreement made in Fountain Valley, California, ---day of ~~~~--~~-' 19~-' by and between COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOSo 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY (each hereinafter referred to collectively as "Districts"). W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Districts are organized and existing under the provisions of. the_ County Sanitation Distric~ Act (Section 4700, et seq. of the Health & Safety Code), and WHEREAS, Districts are each engaged in.the collection, transporting and disposal of sewage and industrial wastes originating wi~h the County of Orange, and WHEREAS, Districts jointly own and operate property used for the treatment and disposal of sewage and industrial was~es, and WHEREAS, each District serves a different territory of the County of Orange and owns certain sewerage facilities independent of each other· District, and WHEREAS, the territory of all districts together constitute a contiguous territory, and . . WHEREAS, by agreement districts maintain a single joint administrative organization w~ich administers all of the affairs of each districts, and WHEREAS, by reason of assessed valuations, varying states of development and land uses, each district has different requirements for funding its operations, and WHEREAS, many administrative benefits can be derived from a consolidation of all districts into a single county sanitation district, and WHEREAS, the County Sanitation District Act provides for the maintenance of zones within a single county san~tation district (Health & Safety Code, Section 4850-4856, inclusive) which can be maintained to keep existing tax burdens in similar proportions upon consolidation of the districts. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and ' the agreeme~ts set forth hereinafter, it is ag·reed as follows: 1. That the districts will petition for consolidation into one county sanitation district ~hose territory w~ll include all of the territory now contained within their respec-. tive territorial boundaries. 2. The consolidation district, hereinafter called --~~~~~~~~- , will be known as 3. When formed, will be divided into zones as authorized under the provisions of Health & Safety Code, Section 4850-4856, inclusive. Said zones will be coterminous with existing boundaries of each district and sub-committees of the directors will be created to recommend to the whole board of directors the special improvements and tax requirements for each zone. Each sub-committee shall include the directors whose constituencies.are significantly included within the zone they are to be concerned with. 4. In determining the revenues needed for each zone within as provide~ in Health & Safety Code, Section 4856, the directors shall calculate the requirements for each zone insofar as the operation of is dis- tinguished from the special sewerage facilities constructed, maintained and operated to serve the localized requirements of the zones in accordance with the joint ownership, operation and construction agreement dated March 10, 1971, now existing by and between the districts, parties to this agreement; 5. The expressed intent of this agreement is to provide the means to maintain the existing proportions of the tax burden on the property within e~ch district to be included in the newly consolidated ' --~~~~~ • RESOLUTION NO. 72-8-3 AUTHORIZING EXECU'l1ION OF A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT INVOLVING FOUR FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL CROSSINGS PER'l1AINING 11.10 CO_N_S-'11_R_U_C_T_l_O_N OF KNOTT INTERCEPTOR A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA_, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement, Permit Application No. 30471, dated , wherein ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT grants permit to District to construct the Knott Interceptor, Contract No. 3-17, under various Flood Control District facilities and rights of way, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are.hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED .at a special. meeting held February 3, 1972. ---=- RESOLUTION NO. 72-9-3 FEDEHAL AHD Sri1 h'l'E GRAWI:S -Krmrl.1111 IN'l1ERCEPTOR A ~POTITIOH OF REACH 1, AND HEACHES 2, 3, AND l~ -------~----~--··-----·----.. ~-- A RESOLUTION OF' TffE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTHICT NO. 3, 01? ORA~·TGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIREC11 ING EXECUTION AND FILING OE' DOClJ1·1EN1J~S NECESSARY F'OR F'EDERAL GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C., 466 ET SEQ., AND STATE GRANT UNDER CLEAN WA'I1ER BOND LAW OF 1970, IN BEHALP OF COUrJ111Y SANITATION DISTRICrl'S NOS. 3 AND 11, OF ORL\NGE COUNTY The Board of birectors of County Sanitatiori District No. 3, of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETE.."RMINE AND ORDER THAT: Section 1. An Act of Congress kno11m as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended ( 33 U.S. C., 466 et .seq. ) provides for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 2. The State Clean T1Tater Bond Law of 1970 authorizes the State Water Resources Contror Board to enter into contracts with public agencies for State grants: for construction of se'lmge treatment works. Section 3. County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other local collection sewering agencies . ... Sec:tion 4. County Sanitation Dist!ict No. 3, of Orange County, has heretofore entered into an agreement with County Sanitation Distric·t ·No. 11, of Orange County, whereby the two said Districts will share in the cost of the construction of certain joint interceptor facilities ~ as said facilities and cost shares are set forth in said ~greement. Said agreement also provides tha~ this District will construct and operate satd facilities and" thereby is deemed to be the "Central Agency" . ..· for said grant applications· as set forth in the California Admini- strative Code. . . . . . Section_2. By means of Resolution No. of County San:L~ tation District No. 11, of Orange County, nnd this resolution, authorization is granted for thE; filing of 8:PPlicatj_ons for grants .under said Act _of Congress and said Clean Water Bond Law for the construction of the Knott Interceptor, a. Portion of Reach 1, and Reaches 2, 3, and l~. Section 6. The General Manager is hereby authorized to prepare, sign and submit, in behalf of County Sanitation District No. 3 and County Sani ta ti on District No. 11, all docmnents necessary to apply for and accept a construction grant under said Ac"t1 of Congress and.said Clean Water Bond Law for a joint project generally described as: Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 1, and Reaches 2, 3, and 4 . • .-·~