The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1971-11-10COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF -ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, F'DUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF'DRNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID DF'F'-RAMP, SAN DIEGO f'.REEWAY) November 5, 1971 TO: MEMBERS OF 1'HE BOARDS OF' DIREC'l10RS OF COUNTY SANITATION DIS'I'RICTS NOS. 1, 2 .. 3 .. 5, 6, 7, AND 11 Gentlemen: TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 The next regular meet:i.ng of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, will be held: Wednesday evening, November 10, 1971 at 7:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California II MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box. 8 12 7 10 844 Ellis Aven u e Fountain Va l ley, Ca l if., 92708 Telephones: of O range County, C aliforn ia JOIN~ B©ARDS REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, November 10, 1 971 7 :30 p .m. A rea Code 714 540-29 10 962-2411 No v ember 5, 1 971 The followi n g is a brief explanation of the more important non- routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which a re not otherwis e self_-explanatory . Warrant lists are not attached t o .the agenda since they are made up immediat e l y preceding the meeting but wi ll ap pear in the com p l ete agenda available at the meeting . J oint Boards No. 8 -CON SEN T CALE NDAR : The following agenda items fall into this c a te g ory in accordance with the definition es t ab li s hed by the Bo a rds: (a) (b) Change Ord e r No . 1 to Job No . Pl-3 -1 -Owing to disruptions c aused by the President's suspens ion of the Dav is-Ba con Act earlier this year, no Federal Wag e Determination s, which are r equi r ed t o be included in Federally assisted c onstru c tion proj e cts, have been is sued . How ever, we have r e c ently rec eived a d etermination for the period during whic h the above job (Odor Control and Improved Influent Sc r eening Facilities a t Reclamat ion Plant No . 1 ) was awarded by District No . 1. We are r equired by the Envi ronmental Protection Agency to include these wag e determin ations by means of a change orde r to the contract . Change Order No . 1 to Job No . Pl-6A -This cont r a ct is with the General Electric Supply Company f or t wo 1000 KVA, pad- mount e d substations. The equipment arrived during the specified time but the Districts • engineering staff requi red certain modifications and r epai rs to the equipment, a s deli- vered , thus holding up final acceptance . We r ecomme nd granting an ext e n sion o f time of 90 c a l e nda r days to the contract for this r eas on . (c) (d) Rec eive and File Master Plan Report for Plant Water Systems - We have received f rom J·ohn Carollo Engineers the third, and final , master plan utility report (a uthorized some time ago) for orderly expansion of our plant utilities systems. The third r eport is entitled ":Master Plan Repo rt -Wate r Systems for Reclamation Plant No . 1 and Plant No . 2 11 and will be used in desig ning construction wo r k fo r the plants for the next several years. This report mere l y provides information which wi ll be incorpora ted in the future construction work ; however , if any Director wou ld like to revie w this re port, it is avai l able . The other two reports, whic h have been previously recei ved and filed, covered the heat energy systems and the ele ctrical energy systems . Authoriz at ion to Substitute Subcontractors, Job No . J-7-2 and J-12 -These two jobs (Adm inistration-En g ineering Building Addition and Vehicle Maintenance Facilities) were recently awarded to the B. H. Miller Construction Company. We h ave received a l etter from the contractor, included with the agenda material, requesting Di s tricts ' app ro val of sub stitution of four subcontractors who asked t o with- draw from the job. Approval of the r equest, as re quired by State l aw, is recommended . . No. 10 -AWARD OF PURCHASE OF VEHICLES: The staff h as concluded tha t it would be desirable to so l icit bids fo r the baJ.ance of the vehic le s budgete d fo r this fisca l year dur ing the national p r ice freeze. According ly, bids fo r this e9uipment we re opened on -N ovember 1. A bid tabulation and re·c omm endation fo r award for each categ ory is enclosed wi th the a g enda mate rial and it is recommended that awa rds of purchaGe be made as f ollows : 1. 2. 3. 4. One, 1-ton closed van type truck .to Anaheim Dodge .a t $3,720.26 One, 4-whee l dr i ve ''Jeep Universal" (replacement) to Brian Ch uchua 's 4-Wheel Drive Cente r at $2 ,468 .38 One, 16,000 p ound truck with a rticul ated hydraulic crane (replac ement ) to F letcher Jones Chevrolet a t $10,023 .20 Four, one-half ton pickuR t rucks (rep lacements) to Fletcher Jones Chevrolet at $9 ,806.63 5.· Two, 4-door pass enger sedans (rep l acement s) to Fletcher Jones Ch evrolet a t $4 ,926.66 6. One, Indu s tria l type wheel t ract or with loader, b a ckhoe, sc rape r, and modular unit to Ha rron, Ric kard and McCone Company at $13,786.50. No. 11 -FURTHER CON S IDE RATION OF PROPOSED STATE POL IC Y REGARDING DISCHARGE OF WASTEWATER TO THE OCEAN : There was an extensive discuss i on on this s u bject at both the r egul ar Joint Board meeting on October 13 and the adjourned Joint Board meeting on October 27. At the latter meeting , the staff was directed to prepare a resoluti o n for considera- tion a t this meeting asking tha t adoption of the policy be deferred -2- until after conclusion of the Southern California Co astal Wate r Research Project study . John Carollo En g ineers and the staff are currently preparing additional ma t e rial and holding discussions with other affected agencies in California. Ac cording ly, the resolution has not yet been drafted in its final form but will be available at the Board meeting . The engine e rs and the staff also are preparing cost information material for presentation to the Di rectors at the meeting. Recommendations for other possible action by the Boards may be presented. No. 12 -REPORT OF SPECIAL C01~4ITTEE FOR STUDYING DIRECTORS' FEES SCHEDULE: This Special Committee, consisting of Chairman Finnell and Directors Hyde, Parsons, Smith and Stephenson, met with Joint Ch a irman Just and the General Counsel on November 1. A written f inal committee report, including recommendations, will be presented to the Directors at this meeting for study and consideration of poss.ible action at the December Joint Board meeting . No. 13 -CONSI DERATION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS: A progress report to the Directors will be presented concerning wage meet-and-confer sessions with the Orange County Emp loyees' Association . No. 15 -CLAIM OF DIANA M. TREMBLAY RE COMPENSATION FOR OV ERTIME OF DECEASED El4PLOYEE (NO RMA N R. TREMBLAY), SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO . 187555 : At the AprilA 1971 Joint Board meeting, the Boards denied a claim for payment of 7b7.5 hours of compensatory time accrued by employee Norman R. Tremblay, deceased. The denial of the claim was based on a written leg al opinion, dated January 27, 1971, from the Districts' General Counsel . It is recommended that the summons pertaining to this claim be received and filed and referred to the General Counsel for appropriate action . District No. 5 No. 27 -CONSID ERATION OF INCREASED DISTRICT CONNECTION CHARGES AS PROVIDED BY DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO . 506 : The District 's conne ction and u se ordinance provide s that if, on or before December 1 of each year, the Directors of the Dist rict determine that a connection charge increase is re quired to provide the faci lities planned in a ccordance with the District's master plan, the connection charg es c an be increased effective January 1 of each year. It is the staff 's recommendation that the allowable increases in the connection charges be adopted by resolution to provide the necessary fundin g f or planned construction projects. The following is a schedule of recommended allowable increases: New Construction Single dwelling building Multiple dwelling building -3- Current Charg es $150 $150 for each dwelling unit or $7.50 for each plumbing fixture, which- ever is less Recommended Allowable Increase $5 $5 for each dwelling unit or $0 .25 for each p lumbing fixture Othe r than d we lling uni ts Replacement buildings, additi ons or a l terations to existing build ings District No . 2 Curre nt Ch arges $7.50 for each plumb i ng fixture unit, minimum con- nection cha rge $75 Reconunended Allowable Increase $0 .25 fo r eac h plumbing fixtu re unit, minimum connec tion charge increase $2.50 Increased charg es in a ccordance wi th Or d inance No. 506 No . 37 -REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL CONCERNING REQUEST OF KIRKHILL RUBBER COMPANY TO BE RELIEVED OF DELINQUENCY CHARGES AS PROVIDED BY THE DISTR ICT 'S CO NNECTION AND USE ORDINANCE: The l etter from the Kir khill Rubber Company, which is enclosed with the ag enda, has been r eferred to the District 's General Counsel f or his review . The Gene r al Counsel wi ll advis e the Boa rd as to possible actions allowabl e within the terms o f the District '.s connection and use ordinance. No . 38 -REPORT OF GENERAL :MANAGER CONCERNING NEGOTIATIO NS WITH THE CHINO BASIN MUNI CIPA L WA'rER DISTRICT : The s t aff 1·1i ll report, v erbally, on the progress o f the negotiations with personne l from the Chino Basin Municipal Wa t er District conc ernin g contractual arrang ements to participate i n the joint const ruc tion o f the p r oposed Santa P.na River Int erceptor Sewe r . Di strict No . 7 No. 42 -CO NS IDERATIO N OF SCHEDUL I NG THE CO NS TRDCTION OF THE WEST RELIEF TRUNK SEWER : The Deputy Chi ef Enginee r has reported that r e c ent ap~l ications for permits to conne c t to the exis ting 12-inch sewer in Tustin Avenue, norther l y o f Fourth Street, have c a u s ed some conc e rn in the Eng ineerin g Department. The existing trunk sewer has a c apacity o f approximately 1.85 MG D. The Santa Ana Community Hospital, now unde r construction on the wes t side o f Tustin Avenue, is r equestir.g a 12-inch ·c onnect i on a nd an 8 -inch connection to thi s trunk sewer to acconunod a te the ir ult imate 600 be d facili t y . In a recent d i s cussion with the mechanical engine er for this deve lopment, he estimat ed t hat the ult ima te flow f r om this faci l ity will be a pp rox imately 1.8 MGD, thus occupying the f ull capacity of our trunk sewer . The En g ineering Dep artment also rec e i ved an inquiry this date :fbr a proposed seven-s tor y medical center to be constructed adjacent t o the hospita l. In a r e cent discussion with Mr. John Bu rke, of the City of Sant a Ana's Engine e ring Department, he indic ated that there i s som e act i vity in the development of the Mabury Ranch on the west s ide o f Tustin Avenue, northerly of Fo urth Str eet .· It is the refor e apparent that consideration mus t be given to -4- providing additional sewer capacity in t his a r ea·. The District's master p l a n r eport anticipated that the Wes t Re l ief Trunk Sewe r wou ld be needed in 1973 at a cost exceeding $5 00,000 . It is the staff 's rec ommendation that the District's enginee r s, Boyle Engineering, be requested to submit a proposal for the design o f the West Relief Trunk Sewe r to provide the necessary c apacity to se r ve the area, based on updated land use information . No . 43 -PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF 120 ACRES TO DISTRICT NO . 7: Included in the agenda material is a request for annexation of approximate l y 1 2 0 ac res which is loc at ed east of the City of Orang e, contiguous to Cha pman Avenue near the intersection o f Newpor t Boulevard . No. 44 -AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF VARIABLE SPEED PUMP CO NTROL -Mc GAW PUMPI NG STATION: The memorandum from the District 's Superintendent of Maintenance, which is included in the agenda material, r ecommends the purchase of a variable speed pump control which was installed on a trial basis and h a s b een under test at the .McGaw Pumping Station for a period of eig ht months from the El ec tric Machinery Company for $2,850, p l us sales tax . It is the staff's recommend at ion that this p urchase be approved . -5- Fred A. Harper General Manager 'I I I I • t_ II BOAt!OS OF D!RECTORS Count y San itatio n Distr icts P. 0 . Sox 5175 of O rans e Co unty , Ca iifornia 10844 Elli!; Avenu~ Fountain Valley, C1iif., S~7C8 11"1 .... IT J Vll'll AGE N DA Novemb e r 10 , 1971 -7:30 p.m . (1) Pledge of Allegi~nce and Invocation (2 ) Ro ll Call (3) Appointment of Chairman p r o tern , if n ecessary ;t:f-~ 6 ~() rLh (4 ) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings , as mailed : Distrl ct 1 Di strict 2 Di strict 3 District 5 Di strict 6 Dictrict 7 Di strict 11 ALL DrsrrRIC TS Octobe r 13 , 1971 regul ar and October 27, 1971 adjourned October 13, 1971 regular and October 27 , 1971 adjourned October 13 , 197 1 regular and October 27 , 197 1 adjourn8d October 13 , 1971 r egular and Oc tober 27 , 197 1 adjourned October 1 3, 1971 regular and Oc tober 27, 197 1 adjourne d Oc t ober 13 , 1971 regular and October 27, 1971 adjour n ed October 13 , 1971 regular and October 27 , 1971 adjourne d Report of the Joint Chairman ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manage r ALL DISTRIC'I'S Report of the General Counsel ' * * * * * * * * * * * (8 ) ALL DISTRICTS CO NSEN T CALENDAR All matters p l aced upon the cons e n t calendar are cons ide r e d as not r e quiring discuss ion or furthe r e xp l a nat i o n and unl ess any parti cul ar item i s r equested to be re mo v e d .f r o m the con sent cale nd ar by a Dir ector , staff member , or.me mb e r of the public in attendanc e , t here wil l be no separat e discussion of these ite ms . All ite ms on the c onsent ca l endar will be enacte d by one acti o n a pproving all moti o ns, and casting a una nimous bal l ot f or reso lu t i ons includ e d on the con sent cal endar . All i tems removed from the co nsent cal endar shall be considered s e parately i n t h e r eg ul a r o rde r o f busi n ess . Memb ers of t h e publi c wh o wish to remove an item fr o m t h e cons e nt c alendar s h al l, upon rec ogni tion by the chair, state ·t h e ir· nam~, addr ess and des i gnate by l ette r t h e i tem to be removed f r om the consent cal end a r . * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman wi ll determine i f any i tems are to b e d e l eted f r om the c0 n se nt cal e n dar . Cons ideration of a ction to approve a ll agenda items appeari ng o n the consent calendar no t sp ecifi cally removed f r o m same . (a ) Co n sideration of Ch ange Or d er No . 1 to the plans and sp e cification s fo r Odor Co nt ro l and Improved Influent Scree ning F a c i ~i tie s a t Rec lamatio n Pl ant No . 1, Job No . Pl -3 -1, i ncor p o r ating Fede r a l Minimum Wage Rates into t h e cont r a ct with F . To Ziebar t h Compa n y , Inc. See p age 11 D1 ' (b ) Co nsid e r at i o n of motion approving Ch a n ge /\/\ <: Orde r No . 1 to the p l ans and specifi cations ,. \ .J for Two 1 000 KVA Pad Mounted Substations (c ) (d ) fo r Pl ant No . 1, J ob No . Pl -6 -lA , authorizing an e xte nsion of 90 cal enda r d ays t o the contract with General El ectric Supp ly Com pany . Se e page "E u Conside rat i on of motion t o rec e ive and fi l e Ma.ster Plan Repo r t for Water Systems For Rec l amation Pl ant No . 1 and· Pl ant No . 2, dated Octob e r, 1 9 71, prepare d by J ohn Caro l lo Enginee rs . Consideration of m0tiori to "rec e ive and f ile l etter with attachme nt s from Bo H. Mi lle r Construction Company , Contractor fo r Ad ministrat i on-Engineering Bu ilding Ad d i t ion , J ob No . J -7 -2, and Veh i c l e Mai n tenance F ac iliti e s, Job No . J -12, and a ppro ving cont ractor 's r equest for substitution of sub cont ractors fo r said work . S ee page ti F' II -2- ' (10 ) ALL DISTRICTS Considerati on of motion to r e c e ive and file bid tabul ati ons and recommendations , and awarding purchas e of the fol l owing : On e , 1 -Ton Close d Van Type Truck , Sp e cification No . A-054 -R, to Anah e im M S Dodge i n the amo unt of $3 ,720 .26 . S ee page 11 G11 On e , 4 -Wh ee l Drive "Jeep Universal " Sp ecification No . A-057, to Brian Chu chua 1 s 4 -Whee l Drive Ce nter in the amount of $2 ,573 .86 . S ee page "H" On e , 16,oo o lb . GVW Truck with Articulated Hydraulic Crane , Specifi cation No. A-058 , to Fletcher J one s Chevrolet in the amount of $10, 023 . 20 . S e e page "I " Four, 1/2-Ton Pickup Trucks, Sp ec ific ation No . A-059 , to F l etcher J ones Ch evrol e t in the amou nt of $SL 733 .13. See page 11 J 11 Two , 4-Doo r Passen ge r Sedans ; Sp e cification No . A-060 , to Fl etche r Jones Ch evro l et in the amount of $4,926 .. 66 . See page "K.11 On e , Industrial Typ e Wh ee l Tractor With Loader and Ba c k h oe , Specification No . A-061, to Ha rron , Rickard & McCone Company in the amount of $13,786 .50 . See page 11 Ln ~ AL L DISTRICTS ~ Furthe r conside ration of propose d State po li cy re d ischarge of wastewat er to the ocean (Material i n a ge nda ALL DISTRICTS Re p o rt of Special Committee for Studying Directors ' Fees Schedules (13) ·ALL DISTRICTS folder) Co nsideration of motion to convene in executive session to consider personnel matt ers <i : Yj (14) ALL DISTRICTS (16) Consi deration of motion to reconvene in r egul ar session ALL DISTRICTS ~n ~ Conside rat ion of motion to receive and fil e summons ~\' """"\. ~ from Diana Mo Tre mbl ay r e compensation for ove rtime ~1~-- of deceased emp l oyee N. R. Tr emb lay , Case No . 1 8 7 555 , and r efer to General Counsel for appropriate acti o n ALL DISTR IC TS Co n sideration or· motion to r eceiv e a nd fil e certification ~(/'\of the Ge neral Manager that h e has checked al l bi lls "-~~\app ea rin g o n th e agenda , found t h em to be in o rd e r, a nd '~"-that h e recomme nds authorization fo r p ay me nt -3- I (17) ALL DISTRICTS \I 0.._ Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint · ~\~ ~ o\ \\ ~i~~!~t~~ ~~d t~!P~~!ir~~~1~~ ~~~~~I~~gN~~rf~n~n~ooks for 0.: C-o-authorizing payment of claims listed on page 11 A" wi/~··L.Jin7r;. .. (18) . ALL DISTRI S \_ '-.. '-.. ~ . -\ ~'O Other busin ss an~ommu~catiOAs, if\a.ny ' (19) any fVl? (20) DISTRIC 1 ~ Conside tion of motion · proving ~rrantsJ\ if See page "B" . '-\ DISTRICTS 1 & 7 , - Consideration-of motion approving suspense fund'. warrants, ·f s "c" 1 any. ee p~e ___ _ (21) DISTRICT '\ Other bus ess a~ommu~ion~ if ~ny (22) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (23) DISTRICT 3 . \c.... Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any ~ ~/ See page "B" r (24) (25) (26) 8 DISTRICTS 3 & 11 l Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants, M\S if any. See page "B" N\ \5 DISTRICT 3 \ \"m,, Other busine~ and ~~unic~ion~, DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 5 . . I Consideration of Resolution No. 71-138-5, authorizing the AA C: increase of connection charges established by Ordinance fv\ i/ No o 506, effective January 1, 1972. See page "M" · \ '/ (28) ~ DISTRICT 5 · \ Consideration of motion approving warrants, if an.y M S See page "B" l '' DISTRICT 5 Other ·business and communications, if any (30) DISTRICT 5 [ Consideration of motion to adjourn .(V\ S (32) (33) DISTRICT 6 , Other busine~and DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn co~nic~~ns, ~f ~Y .wd s (34) DISTRICT 11 ~ 1 Considerat on of\mo.tion provi~g war~nt~ if any See page II c" "'-.., ' .IC' \ ''· -4- (35 ) (36 ) DISTRI CT 11' Other busi riess DISTRICT 11 C.:on s jc'leration and ~uni~ons \_if ~y ~ o f mot i on to adjourn q ( c~ (o • ( 37 ) DI STRICT 2 Consideration of motion to receiv.e and fi l e l etter dated October 1 5 , 1 971, from Kirkhill Rubber C o ~pany requesting [V\ 5 waiver of p enalty charges assessed und e r provisions of the Uni form Connection and Use Ordinance , and report of General Co un sel on said r e q u~st . See pag e 11 N11 ~ c; C .:::rY ___£" /1 ~ DI STRICT 2 --,/'1 ~ ~ Prog r es s r e p ort o n ne gotiations with Chino Bas in Municipal Wat er District in connection with proposed joint use of faciliti es (39 ) (40 ) (41) (42 ) (44) DIS TRICT 2 I 5 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any ('/'\ See page 11 B11 DIS TRI Other DI STRICT 2 Conside ration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 7 ~o\/t'(~ .5 Consideration of motion aut horizing the Gene ral ~; Mana ge r t o r equest a proposal from Boy l e Engineeri ng for design of We st Re l ief Trunk Sewer DISTRICT 7 . ~ Consideration of motion to r eceive and file l etter dated · o October 14, 1 9 71, from H . Laws o n Mead , attorn ey for Frank : Fo Mead, et al , requesting anne xation of approximately 120 a.~res of land conti guous to Chapman Avenue n ear t h e inte r - s ection of Newport Bo ulevard; and consideration of action on said request . See page 11 0 11 DISTRICT 7 Consideration of moti on auth o ri zing the Gene r a l Manage r A\1\1 to i ssue a purchase order fo r Vari ab l e Speed Pump Contro l ~ \ S .for the McGaw Pump ing Station to Electric Machinery Company in t h e amount of $2 ,e50 .oo , plus tax . See page "P " (45 ) DISTRICT 7 t Con sideration of mot i on appro ving warra nt s , if a n y M 5 See p age II c" I ' I DISTR I CT 7 Other business and communicat~o~~ J-o C\ :::-~ D/("VY'-~t.b// ;z_ DI STRICT 7 Consideration of mot i on to adjourn to 5 :00 p .m., 1 9 71 -5 - Chalrman Just ~ Report of the Joint Chairman l.- (A) Presentation of Service Awards to the following: Wilbur Cridlebaugh -15 years Wilbur began with the Districts June 19, 1956, and works in the Collection Facilities Maintenance Department · Melvin Templar -15 years Mel started with the Districts August 22, 1956, and was working in the Truck and Stationary Equipment Maintenance Department until his recent medical leave of absence Charlie Fletcher -10 years Charlie started with the Districts June 26, 1961, and now works in Plant Maintenance and Construction Donald Honomichl -10 years Don began here October 9, 1961, and is currently employed in Plant Maintenance and Construction (B) Presentation of Apprentice I Completion Certificate: Charles White -Apprentice I Charles, who lives in Huntington Beach, has satisfactorily completed the prescribed two-year training curriculum for Apprentice I in the field of waste water quality control, with a minimum of three months of study and application in each of the following: Plant Maintenance Collection Facilities Maintenance Mechanical Maintenance Electrical Maintenance Treatment Plant Operations Laboratory Procedures General Engineering Practices (C) Presentation of Service Award, as follows: (D) T. A. Dunn -15 years Ted came to work for the Districts August 25, 1956, in the Laboratory. He is now Director of Operations and Laboratories. Call meeting of the Executive and Building Committees for 6:00 p.m., Tuesday, November 23rd. Invite Directors Sims and Hirth to attend. ~·~c.~ctir!g D£.i.te No v. 1 0 , 1 9 71 Tir.ie DI STHICT 1 ~- Gris et ./ Miller 7 Porter 'h:._ Batti!! 4,L. DI STRIC T 2 ,..~ ith v ri stie i7 Cl ark z/ Cul v e r JZ Finnell v He:cri n .JL. Just t7 S:L ms Stephens on 5/' Wedaa Winn V Battin ~ DI S~I.1RIC11 3= / Hyde tr._ Berton .LL. g~~~~tie ~ Culve r Lavis Green Harpe r Ha r vey :Z He rrin ..LL He me on ¥: ldcn l Whinney _ Q . ~ ..... J.m S Step~enson ¥ Ba ttin DIS 'r ill.: CT Parsons Hi rth Ba t tin DI STPJ:CT Po:cte1~ 'f.i'c I rn ri s Battin DISTF.ICT 1 M""rrr-=1=1s::e ==rc::ac:· == V Gris e t ...i,.L . Porte r ~ ~:~r~~s ~ Batt i n Z DI STRIC'E ? r ipl e y oen Battin 1 1 ~ Herrin Coco Hilem an Root Jackson Gomez Gris e t Ha r pe r Zuniga Du tton Machado Schniepp Kro es en Wes tra Root Jack son Fonte Mc Cracken Just Kan e l Gris e t Lewis Barne s Zuniga Du tton Croul Hi rth Coco He rrin Hi r th Hilema n Mc Cracken -- 7:30 p.m. -- --· - -- Dis trict s 1 ,2,3,5 ,6 ,7&11 J Oi rrr· BOAHDS Just V Ha r per Berton 17"' i'l est ra Chris tie . i/Ro ot Clark :L" Jacksoi; Co en ~ ~ Culver ~ Davis -4:,.L Fonte F innell .1Z._ Gomez Gre en -1..L Mc Crac ke::. _ Griset -~-~ Herrin __ . Harper Just Harvey . Kanel Hemeon -S-Lewis Herrin· ::JZ:'Griset Hirth ~Croul Holde n -1,L. Hogard Hyde ..JL Kroesen Mcirm1s _,._..-Hirth Mc Whinney ~ Miller :Z Coco _ Parsons :z Porter _a Roge rs ~H ir th Shipley ~M c Cracke~ Sims ~uni ga Sm ith ~il eman Stephenson l:?'Putton Wedaa -i/'J.1achado Winn :::JZ::)c hniepp Battin _JZ. * 7:- Mi tc~ -~-- Boyd ~oldbe rg OT HERS (\f J /Harper ~ IV[ e() ~ BroHn ~ Sylvester.....L.c::::: Lew i s .,/ Dunn ..&:::::- Cl a :r k e t.../ ,S j_g l er c 5 r ab b _v.!.. ;-0 W'Y\ _.liL_ Carls oh Finster Ga l1ouay J2.:: Hoh ene r Hunt Keith :JZ' Low ry Maddox Martinson-- Nis son v Piersall -- Ste vens \\e,\~\er ~ ~~ic ~tie.\ .~ Lr ;4 ~·lek \J3 ~ ~ (),~\esW"'1i .\-e( ) ~ f\/\y-s. U}ni h ? --- S ; v-n pso If ,L- RESOLUTIONS & SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS November 10, 1971 -7:30.p.m •. WARRANT NO. 16600 16501 16602 ~603 -:ro6o4 16605 16606 16607 16608 16609 16610 16611 16612 16613 16614 16615 16616 16617 16618 16619 16620 16621 16622 16623 16624 16625 16626 16627 -'S628 ~629 16630 16631 16632 16633 16634 16635 16636 16637 16638 16639 16640 16641 16642 16643 16644 16645 16646 16647 16648 16649 16650 16651 16652 ., '5653 '--6654 16655 16656 16657 16658 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Active Trucking Service, Freight· All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings Allied Bolt & Supply Co., Small Hardware Hilary Allison, Employee Mileage Bank of America, Bond & Coupon Collection American Chemical Society, Technical Journal City of Anaheim, Power The Anchor Packing Co., Gaskets Alpine Aromatics, Inc., Chemicals American Compressor Co., Compressor Parts Amoco Chemicals, Lab Supplies Azusa Western, Inc., Concrete Beacon Auto Parts,·Inc., Truck Parts Bearing Specialty Co., Pump Parts John G. Bell Co., Air Cylinder James Benzie, Employee Mileage Kris Lindstrom, Pathology Course MO 10/13/71 A. Biederman, Inc., Gauge Bomar Magneto Service, Inc:, Engine Parts Brenner-Fiedler & Associates, Valves Bristol Park Medical Group, Pre-employment Physical Bruner Corp., Water Softener C & R Reconditioning Co., Compressor & Pump Parts California Collator Sales, Binding Castle Controls, Inc., Valves Central Mobile Home Movers, Reiocate Mobile Office Certified Laboratories, Inc., Solvents College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Supplies Compressor Systems, Inc., Compressor Repair Concrete Coring Co., Concrete Coring Consolidated Electrical Distr., Electrical Supplies Constructors Supply Co., Small Tools Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa County Water Dist., Water Clarence c. Cummings, District Inspection Services Curtin Scientific Co., Lab $upplies D/C Concrete Pumping Service, Concrete Pumping Daniel Industries, Inc., Valve Ducommun Metals & Supply, Bronze Stock Dwyer Instruments, Inc., Gauges Wilber ~. Eads, Employee Mileage ~astman, Inc., Office Supplies Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring Engineers Sales-Service Co., Pump Parts Farr Co. , Filters:· Fischer & Porter Co., Telemetry Supplies Fisher Controls Co., Regulator Parts Fowler Equipment Inc., Equipment Rental City of Fountain Valley, Excavation Permit William H. Fox, Employee Mileage Fredson, Battery Switches Freeway Machine & Welding Shop, Machine Gasket G. w. Maintenance, Inc., Small Hardware Gaines Electric Supply, Electrical Supplies Garden Grove Lumber & Cement, Building Supplies Gasket Mfg. Co., Gaskets Gelco Grouting Service, Pump Rental Geller•s Ready Mix Concrete, Cement General Electric Supply Co., Electrical Supplies A-1 AMOUNT· 7.10 140.62 . 121. 98 13.80 422.37 9.00 25.00 119.01 546.00 243.33 151.98 661.53 109.11 161.47 155.91 55.01 41.50 27.16 13.86 196.74 12.50 995.40 370.00 19.94 82.43 150.00 80.06 89;07 889.66 43.00 341.04 1,622.71 503.87 6.00 1,147.15 911.54 175.00 71.09· 151.09 66.88 9.75 207.25 1,800.00 325.82 46.87 468.62 40.93 351.75 12.00 16.50 40.07 48.oo 29.66 1,094.21 238.72 212.15 300.00 52.49 80.19 WARRANT NO. 16659 16660 16661 166'62 16663 -664 ~665 16666 16667 16668 16669 . 16670 16671 16672 16673 16674 16675 16676 16677 16678 16679 16680 16681 16682 16683 16684 16685 16686 16687 16688 -,..689 ~690 16691 16692 16693 16694 16695 16696 16697 16698 16699 16700 16701 16702 16703 16704 16705 16706 16707 16708 16709 16710 16711 16712 16713 ., ~714 '--1715 16716 16717 16718 16719 IN FAVOR OF Genera 1 Te le phone Co. $ Georgia-Pacific Corp., Chlorine Gladman & Wallace, Truck Tires SCM Glidden-Durkee, Paint Supplies Golden West Fertilizer Co., Bob Gosche Co., Small Hardware Graybar Electric Co., Electrical Supplies Hach Chemical Co., Inc., Test Equipment George T. Hall Co., Inc., Boiler Parts Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting & C.O.D. Ex~enses Hewlett-Packard Co., Lab Supplies · Honeywell, Inc., Charts & Switch Repair Howard Supply Co., Small Hardware & Piping City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Beach Equipment Rentals, Equipment Rental International Harvester Co., Truck Parts Irvine Ranch Water Dist., Water Johnston Pump Co., Flow Pump Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies Keuffel & Esser Co., Reproquction Supplies King Bearing Inc., Engine Parts Kit4ell Muffler & Engineering, Fittings Kleen-Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Tools & Hardware LBWS, Inc., Welding & Lab Supplies L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Rental The Lacal Co., Pump Packing Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Filter Lawless Detroit Diesel, Blower Repair Judy Lee, Employee Mileage Lewis Bros. Battery, Batteries Link Belt, Dewatering Equipment H. J. Lorenz Co., Piping R. W. McClellan & Sons, Plaster Sand Majestic Fasteners Co., Small Hardware Mesa Supply, Truck Parts Millipore Corp., Lab Supplies Model Glass Co., Mirror E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Covers Herbert A. Moss, Special Labor Counsel Nalco Chemical Co., Chemicals Newark Electronic, Electronic Supplies Newport.Skyways, Inc., Aerial Photo Charter c. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel Retainer City of orange, water Orange County Radiotelephone Oreo Block Co., Building Supplies Pacific Pumping Co., Pump Pacific Telephone Co. M. C. Patten & Co., Inc., Piping Pneumatic Machinery Co., Valves Postmaster, Postage Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage Radio Products Sales, Inc., Electronic Tubes Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Hauling Red Valve Co., Inc., Pump Parts . Bernard T. Redican, District Inspection Services Repco Engineering, Inc., Heat Exchanger Repair Rhodia, Inc., Chemicals Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Parts Sacramento State College Foundation, Technical Manual A-2 ·AMOUNT 1,680.38· li;747.04 19.05 106.22 1,008.00 157.98 570.70 35.70 157.37 152.02 40.95 435.99 2,297.06 57.52 70.65 57.16 1.50 3,245.00 2,245.95 . 42.75 357.50 228.38 102.01 79.53 986.52 1,524.17 51.76 56.18 36.86 21.45 181.75 1,225.45 210.00 52.50 421.70 234.05 207.40 18.90 468.30 250.00 173.25 121.72 25.20 .700.00 9.03 340.61 20.48 1,554.53 388.30 22.37 78.35 300.00 53.46 108.24 90.00 337.68 1,264.05 633.71 294.oo 81.77 12.60 WARRANT NO. 16720 16721 16722 167~3 16724 ~725 ro726 16727 16728 16729 16730 . 16731 16732 16733 16734 16735 16736 16737 16738 16739 16740 16741 16742 16743 16744 16745 16746 16747 16748 16749 --:750 ~51 16752 16753 16754 16755 16756 16757 16758 16759 16760 16761 16762 16763 16764 16765 ., C,766 '..J767 16768 16769 16770 16771 IN FAVOR OF Santa Ana Blue.Print Co., Printing Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Rewi~d . · Sargent-Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies Scientific Products, Lab Supplies Sherwin-Williams Co., Paint Supplies A. H. Shipkey, Inc., Truck Tires & Tubes John Sigler, Employee Mileage & OJT Instruction Singer-Friden Division, Office Supplies South Orange Supply, Small Hardware Southern California Edison Co. Southern California Gas Co. Southern California Water Co. Southwest Flexible Co., Equipment Rental Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water Speed-E-Auto Parts, Truck Parts · · Stanco Mfg. & Sales, Inc., Truck Parts · Standard Oil Co., Gasoline John w. Stang Corp., Pump T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Tractor Parts Tony's Lock & Safe, Locks . Paul Torres, Employee Mileage Tustin Water Works, Construction Water U. S. Equipment Co., Compressor Parts Vaniman Camera, Photo Processing & Supplies VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies . John R. Waples R~S., Odor Consultant Ward & Harrington, Lumber Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Repair Robert A. Webber, Employee Mileage Western Salt Co., Salt Westinghouse Electric Corp., Electric Cart Parts Willig Equipment, Truck Parts Wilson Engine & Equipment Co., Engine Parts Russ Wold , Employee Mileage $ World Travel Bureau, Inc., Meeting & Conference Travel Don Wright, Employee Mileage Xerox Corp., Reproduction Supplies Zodiac, Reproduction Supplies Coast Insurance Agency, Liability Insurance Premium John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services ·AMOUNT 5.88· .•. 288. 03 200.04 65.14 .135.37 178.44 1,147.70 56.26 23.49 1,022.00 1,418.38 6.52 315.00 67.62 183.44 26. 96 630.56 561.75 137.03 77·.59 40.98 602.95 870.25 207.38 242.01 244.oo 635.46 425.46 15.75 32.03 348.86 185.84 169.85 173.04 129.60 73.86 877.00 132.62 4,216.00 1,581.63. TOTAL JOINT OPERATING $ 71,530.41 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF James G. Biddle Co., Test Equipment John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Serv. -Plant Const. Constructors Supply Co., Machine Equipment Daily Pilot, Bid Notice Pl-12-5A William P. Ficker, A.I.A., Architect J-13 Freeman Electric Construction, Contractor Pl-6-1 General Electric Supply Co., Contractor Pl-6-lA J. Putnam Henck, Contractor P2-17 J. E. & W. w. Hoagland, Contractor P2-19 E. T. I. and Kordick, Contractor P2-ll-l B. H. Miller Const. Co., Contractor J-7-2/J-12 Charles Meriam Co., Test Equipment A-3 $ 294.90 28,176.07 1,332.28 16.57 1,755.00 34,947.00 49,177.80 114,527.99 114,056.73 33,156.00 6,477.30 232.63 WARRANT NO. 16772 16773 16774 16775 16776 16777 ~778 ~779 IN FAVOR OF Moline Malleable Iron Co., Sprokets $ Reed Electric Sales & Supply, Tools Saunders & Co., Lawn Mowers & Edgers Speed-E-Auto Parts, Tools Richard Terry & Associates, Environmental Impact Study Healy Tibbitts Const. Co., Contractor I-7-3 · Twining Laboratories, P2-17/19, I-7-3 & Pl-6-1 F. T. Ziebarth, Contractor Pl-1R-l/P2-1R-l TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF A-4 AMOUNT l0,995.92 183. 84. .. ~g55. 75 103.95 1,366.66 15,387.62 756.60 52,134.75 DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARrtANT NO. IN FAVOR OF · '80 Lowry and Associates, Reclamation Plant Study ~ 16787 16788 ~ DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Cook & Barletta, Release Retained Percentage 3-15 c. Arthur Nissan, Legal Services, Amercoat Suit ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 3-16, 3-18 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-16 Merco Construction Engr., Contractor 3-16 DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 3-17 DISTRICT NO. 5 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF County of Orange, Compaction Testing 5-18 Zurn Engineers, Release Retained Percentage 5-18 -B- .Ill!. - AMOUNT $ 6,141.80 $ 8,620.08 248.75 $ 8,868.83 $ 8,697.75 782.28 79,234_.11 $ 88,714.14 $ 91, 582 .97 $ 11,465.00 $ 55.33 32, 756 .30 $ 32,811.63 • WARRANT NO. . '89 ~90 16791 16792 16793 16794 16795 16796 16797 16798 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS . IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services Maridayle Thompson Peay & Norvada Land Co., Refund. Annexation Processing Deposit CONSTRUCTION FUND WARRANTS. IN FAVOR OF County of Orange, Compaction Testing 7-6-1, 7-6-2 Security Title Insurance Co., Title Search 7-6-3 The Tustin News, Bid Notice 7-6-4 DISTRICTS NOS. 1 & 7 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engr. Serv. 1-12, 7-6-1, 7-6-2 Mike Masanovich Construction, Contractor. 1-12 Osborne Labs., Inc., Testing 7-6~1, 7-6-2, 1-12 Ernest E. Pestana, Inc., Contractor 7-6-2 Sully Miller Contracting Co., Contractor 7-6-1 -C- $ .• . AMOUNT 178.50 325.00 $ 503.50 809.89 . 15.00 49.49 $ 1,377.88 $ 1,826.75 93,753.00 2,700.00 189,384.30 225,973.67 $513,637.72 '\.IV '-' ._' ..i. ~ ._.,, o U ...:... ..I.• -. .).. ...L.. "-' H J.,.I ..l.. V .J.. .l. ~ ..L v J. U VJ," V • \,: ~ ~\VU \JV \) l 1 J. J. P. 0. BOX 8127 -1084.h Ellis J.. venue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. l --------- CONTRACTOR: F. T. Ziebarth Comoany, Inc. DATE: November 10, 1971 Odor Control and nnproved Influent Screening Facilities JOB: at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-3-l . c Amourit of this change order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $. none 1.._,1 In accordance with contract provisions, the following "'change~ in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. · The attached F~deral Minimum Wage Rates No. ~~-2, 527, · .. ·_ dated September 3, 1971 and expiring January 2,_1972, .are hereby incorporated in the specificat~ons for this. job. · Board· authorization date: ·~ November 10, 1971 .. J.OHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS. By~--~--~--~--~-------:- A~enda Item #8(a) .. Original Contract Price $108,400.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ __ n_o_1_1e ___ _ This Change (ADD)(DEDUCT) $ __ n_o_n_e __ _ Amended Contract Price $108,400.00 • -n-· .Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California Dy /s/ Paul G. Brown ----------------·--------Chief EnGin~cr F. '£. ZIEBAR'l1H C0£.1PANY, INC. All Districts CHANGE ORDEH C .O. NO. 1 --------- CONTRACr.roR: General Electric Supply Company DATE: November 10, 1971 JOB: Two 1000 KVA Pad Mounted Substations for Plant No. l,Job No. Pl-6-1.-=: .. Amo':lnt of this change order (A~D) (J)EDUCT) · $ -0------ '..,I In accordance with contract provisions, the follo\·1ing changes· in the contract and/or contract work a.re hereby authorized and as cornpensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Due to requirements of the Districts, delays have· occurred in the final acceptance of the equipment for \·Jhich ·the contract time is hereby extended 90 ·calendar days. TOTAL TIME EXTENSION ••• 90 calendar days SUMr'1.ARY: Original Contract.Date Original Contract Time .....,; ·Original Completion Date . Time Extension Tnis Change Order Total Extension of Contract Time Revised Completion Date Actual Completion Date ·January 28, ·1971 184 calendar days July 31, 1971 90 calendar days 90. calendar days. October 29, 1971 October 29, 1971 Original Contract Price $ 61,472.25 Board authorization date: ~ovember 10, 1971 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS Prev. Auth. Changes $ -o- This Change (ADI:~) (DEDUCT) $ -0- Amended Contract Price $ 61,472.25 . Approved: . COUNTY SANITATION DIStRICTS of Orange County, Caltfornia By /s/ Paul G. Brown ------. Chief Engine0r GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY By ________ ~--~~~--~~~~~~--By~----~--~~--~~----~------ Ag end a Item #8(~) -E-·All Di s tr j_ c ts B. H, ~t1~ILLER CONSTRUCTION CO. ? .. ~2 Du Pont Drive 1_,port Beach California 92664 Tel. (714) 833-8330 October 18, 1971 Orange County Sanitation District #1 10844 Ell is A venue Fountain Valley, California Attention: Mr. Doug Preble Gentlemen: Re: Administration and Vehicle Buildings The following is a list of subcontractors who have requested to be with- drawn as the listed subcontractors on the above mentioned job, together with the names of the subcontractors who have rep laced them. Withdrawn Replaced By Demand Dry Wall Ken Burton & Sons Eckman Steel Wallco . Cc;:>mpton Glass Gleason's Glass A. E. C. Electric Hi. Lite Electric Building Administration Administration Vehicle · Administration Vehicle Administration Attached please find copies of letters of withdrawal received from ·the subcontractors. Your approval of these cha.nges is respectfully requested at your earliest convenience! Yours truly, B. H. MILLER CON;S~fuc1,10N co. ~b ~11~d~l-l~ Clyde 'Mitchell General Superintendent CM:l Enc. Copy to Est. Supt. Agenda Item #8(d) F-1 All Distrj_cts . --·-· --· - ------------------------·------~----··-·-------··-------------------------·- O::toher S, 1q71 B. n. MJ:1,f,ER C0!.1l~ANY 2152 DiJPOtJ'r DRIVE ':Demc:md ':Drywall, ~ nc. 2293 SO. GRAND AVE. SAtlTA ANA, CALIF. 92705 PH: (714) 557-6537 NEW20RT BEACH, CALIFOR~IA ATTN: JOE ?EL{RO·'l Suh: Withdrm1l Dea;: Sir, RE: Enginn-=1:ing and Mai:1t~n~nce Uuilding Orange County San:itation Dis ::1·ict We requcs t to be withdrawa as t'.rn list ~d s!1b-cont·r.actor on the abo\7=~ s t·ited p&:ojc:t S incer.ely, DEMAND mrxWAT .. T .. ' TNC. ·~·~/_ ... , ", ~. .. ,. \ ·-.,,. ... :-,:. : , ~: .'--~ M. ROSEHYRE Man.a3~r ··HR :·1b '..i _Agenda Item #8(d) F-2 All Districts r • ---------,--·------ LICENSED BONDED INSURED I ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS· 6908 Oran Circlo • .fluona Park, Calif.• 90620 " . \. B.H. Miller Co. 2152 Dupont Dr. Newport Beach, Calif • . Attention: Joe Perrone Dear Sir: (714) 522-6224 September. 30, 1971 Re: Administration & Engineering Building . Orange County Sanitation District -Fountain Valley Job #J-7-2 ·· Due to a mistake in the sub-contract listing on the above job, and in the interest o~ fair bidding practices, we respectfully request that our name be withdrawn from the listing ot:y-:.this job. /// LG/rk Very t_pf(y Y9-tlfS, , /.-·-..................... .-·--;···.. . ... -2/ ( . ~ . / {< ,1.,/ .... -- Le~. 6or.lin~;President . .._ .. ,.. • I Agenda Item #8(d) F-3 All Distrtcts I • ---·--·-··-·-·-=-----· --·----·---··-------------- ~~Ion <fJlaad, Jlnc ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Com~lete Glazing Contractors~--~~~~- "' . \. B. H. MILLER CONSTRUCTION CO. 2152 DuPont Drive Newport Beach, C~lifornia 92664 RE: WITHDRAWAL REQUEST Gentlemen: /' 2501 NORTH SANTA FE AVENUE COMPTON, CALIFORNIA 90222 P .0. BOX 5505 COMPTON, CALIFORNIA 90224 639-6440 636-0849 October 13, 1971 It is our request that your firm withdraw· our name from the list on the below referenced projects: A. VEHICLE NAINTENAi'1CE FACILITIES Orange Coun~y Sanitation District William P. Ficker, A.I.A. Newport Boach, California B. ADMINISTRATION-ENGINEERING BUILDING ADDITION Orange County· sanitation District William P. Ficker, A.I.A • . Newport Beach, California WRS:pn cc: file ALUMINUM STORE FRONTS AND DOORS 0 TABLE TOPS e GLAZING e .A~enda Item #8(d) Very truly yours, Wfi liam R. Smith President SLIDING GLASS DOORS GLASS • MIRRORS 0 0 F-4 I' ALUMINUM AND STEEL SASH LOUVRE WINDOWS All Districts ___ :.. 14420 CARMENITA ROAD NORWALK, CALIFORNIA 90650 BoHoMiller Constro Coo B. 2152 Du Pont Drive Newport Beach) California Attn: Mro Joe Perron ... ""' September 24, 1971 --... ~ • j Subject: Administration Build.ing, Fountain Valley, California Vehicle Storage & }~intenance Building, Fountain Valley; Californiao Gentlemen: We wish to be released as the li~ted Subcontractor for the Structural Steel & Miscellaneous iron work on subject job. Very truly yours, ECKMAN STEEL, INCORPORATED . I . . : l i . I ! ( . ·., . r ....... \-:-."" \' : I ( 1 l \ v · \. { · ') . ' v· l • ' \., '-" \ ... :_ "· .. ... ,. v \. . -.{ I . . I . w.c.MUHLHAUSER i Vice President ... WCM/nfpo- . Agenda Item #8(d) F-5 All Districts B I D TABULATION ---------- Date: Uove;mber 1, 1971 Contract For: 1. 2_. 3. ~ • ONE (1) ONE-TON CLOSED VAN TYPE TRUCK . SPECIFICATION NO. A-054-R BIDDER Anaheim Dodge 1120 s. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim, California Fletcher Jones Chevrolet 6633 Westminster Avenue Westminster, California International Harvester 1110 E. Katella Avenue Anaheim, California Santa Ana Dodge, Inc. 1401 North Tustin Avenue Santa Ana, California Co. BID AMOUNT $3,543.10 3,593.64 3,639.97 3,655.95 * * *" * * * * * * * * * PLUS 5% SALES TAX $177.16 1_79.68 182.00 182.80 TOTAL BID $3,720.26 3,773.32 3,821.97 3,~38.75 It is reco~ended that award be ·made to Anaheim Dodge, 1120 S. Anaheim Boulevard,. Anaheim, California, the lowest and best bidder. J. Wayne·Sylvester Director of Finance Agenda Item #10 -G-All Districts B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N ---------- Date: November 1, 1971 Contract For: • ONE (1.) 4-WHEEL DRIVE "JEEP UNIVE.RSAL" ·SPECIFICATION NO. A-057 BIDDER BID AMOUNT LESS TRADE-IN PLUS 5% SALES TAX 1. Brian Chuchua•s 4-Wheel Drive Center $3,188.93 $800.00 $159.45 1625 S. Harbor Blvd. Fullerton, California * * * * * * * * * * * Specifications were sent to th~ following firms: Brian Chuchua 1 s, 1625 S. Harbor, Fullerton Shay's Auto Sales, 13106 E. Whittier Blvd., Whittier Burgins Jeep, 4001 Cherry, Long Beach Milne Bros. Jeep Center, 1951 E. Colorado, Pasadena Dean Lewis Imports, 1966 Harbor Blvd., Costa Mesa Go M. Woods, 1710 S. Anaheim, Blvd., Anaheim Copelana Motors, 800 E. First Street, Santa Ana TOTAL BID $2,548.38 The bid received from Brian Chuchua's 4-Wheel Drive Center, 1625 South Harbor, Fullerton, California, has been reviewed by myself and the Maintenance Superintendent and compares favorably with past bids for the same type of equipment. I, therefore, recommend that the purchase of this vehicle be made from Brian Chuchua. Agenda Item #10 J. Wayne Sylvester Director of Finance -H- I' All Districts B I D TA.BULAT I 0 N ---------- Date: November 1, 1971 Contract For: • ONE (1) 16,000 LB. GVW TRUCK WIT~ ARTICULATED .HYDRAULIC CRANE -SPECIFICATION NOa A-058· 1. 2. 3. · BIDDER Fletaher Jones Chevrolet 6633 Westminster Avenue Westminster, California Stanco Mfg. & Sa:les, Inc. 800 Spruce Lake Drive Harbor City, California Carmenita Ford Truck Sales 13443 Freewaj Drive La Mirada; California \..._/ International Harvester Co. 1110 E. Katella Ave. Anaheim_, California . 5. McCoy Ford 1600 W. Lincoln Anaheim, Ca~ifornia 6. A. B.. Chance Company Pitman Mft; Co. Division 14841 Don Julian Road Industry, California 7. Anaheim Dodge 1120 S. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim, California BID AMOUNT $10,335.91 10,052.00 l0_,299.51 lo _,·402. oo 10,337.57 .. · LESS TRADE-IN $790.00 500.00 500.00 275.00 ·No Bid * * * * * * * * * * PLUS 5% SALES TAX $477.29 487.60 514.98 520.10 516.88 TOTAL BID $10,023.20 10,039.60 10,314.49 10~647.io 10,854.45 No Bid No Bid It is recommended that award be made to· Flet.cher Jones Chevrolet; 6633 Westminster Avenue, Westminster, California, the lowest and b~st bidder. Agenda Item #10 -I- J. Wayne Sylvester Director of Finance All Districts B I D TA B·u LAT I 0 N ---------- .Date: November 1, 1971· Contract For: • 1 .. 2. ".:) .J. ~ .5. FOUR (4) 1/2-TON PICKUP TRUCKS SPECIFICATION NO. A~·052_ BIDDER Fletcher Jones Chevrolet 6633 Westminster Avenue W:estmins ter, California Anaheim Dodge 1120 s. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim, California International Harvester 1110 E. Katella Avenue Anaheim, California Santa Ana Dodge, Inc. 1401 N. Tustin Avenue· Santa Ana, California McCoy Ford 1600 W. Lincoln Anaheim, California Co. BID AMOUNT $10,739.65 10 ,670·. 30 10,735.00 10,767.50 11,462.90 LESS TRADE-INS $1,470.00 800.00 660.00 600.00 760.00 * * * * * * * * * * * PLUS 5% SALES TAX $536.98 533.52 536.75 538.38 573.~6 TOTAL BID . $ . 9' 806 . 6 3 10,403.82 10,611.75 10,705.88 . 11, 276. 06 It is recommended that awa~d be made to Fletcher Jones Chevrolet, 6633 Westminster Avenue, Westminster, California, the lowest and best bidder. J. Wayne Sylvester Director of Finance A~~enda Item #10 -J-All Districts B I D T A B U L A T I -0 N ------------ Date: November 1, 1971 Contract Por: . 1. 2. . f TWO (2) 4-DOOR PASSENGER SEDANS SPECIFICATION NO. A-060 BIDDER BID AMOUNT LESS TRADE-INS Fletcher Jones Chevrolet $6,011.10 $1,385.00 6633 Westminster Ave. Westminster, California McCoy Ford . 1600 W. Lj_ncoln 5,953.46 509.00 Anaheim, California * * * * * * * * * * * * ·PLUS 57~ SALES TAX ·$300.56 297.68 TOTAL BID $4,926.66 5,751.14 It is recommended that award be made to Fletcher Jones Ch~vrolet, 6633 Westminster Avenue, Westminster, California, the lowest· and best bidder. Agenda Item #10 -K- J. Wayne Sylvester Pirector of Finance All Districts B I D --- ·Date: November 1, 1971 Contract For: l·. 2. ~ .J. \.,,,J 5. • ONE (1) INDUSTRIAL TYPE TRACTOR WITH LOADER AND BACKHOE SPECIFICATION NO. A-061 BIDDER BID AMOUNT PLUS.5% SALES TAX Harroo, Rickard & McCone Co. $13,130.00 $656.50 13770 E. Firestone Blvd. Norwalk, California TOTAL BID $13,786.50 ·International Harvester Co. 13;138.00 . 656. 90 13,794.90 620 E. Katella Avenue Anaheim, California McCoy Ford Tractor 401 N. Anaheim Blvd. 13,402.00 . 670.10-14,072.10 Anaheim, California Milo Equipment Corp. 10,800.00 540.00 11,340.00*· 1830 E. Warner Avenue Santa Ana, California T & H Equipment Co., Inc. No Bid 2506 S. Harbor Blvd. Santa Ana, California * * * * * * * * * * * * The bids for the above equipment have been evaluated and it has been d~termined that the bid of Milo Equipment Corporation does not comply with the specifications for said equipment (see attached evaluation by Maintenance Superintendent). It is, therefore, recommended that the bid of Milo Equipment Corporation in the amount of $11,340.00 be rejected and award be made to Harron, Rickard & McCone Company, 13770 E. Firestone Boulevard, Norwalk, California, in the amount of $13,786.50, as the lowest and best bidder meeting the specification. J. Wayne Sylvester Directo~ of Finance Agenda Item #10 L-1 All Districts I \.,./ "-'I . November 4, 1971 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 . (714) 962-2411 MEMORANDUM TO: J. Wayne Sylvester, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Recommendation for award of One (1) Industrial Type Wheel Tractor with Loader and Backhoe - Specification No. A-061 I have evaluated the bids for subject equipment which were opened on November l; 1971, and have determined that the apparent low bidder, Milo Equipment Company, has bid a unit that does not meet the specifications, as follows: .Egui12men t Unit S:eecification Bid Model JD-3iO JD-300 H.P. 52 H.P. 43 H.P. Lift 3800 lbs. 2650 ·lbs .. Breakout Force 6200 lbs. 4000 lbs. Digging Depth 16 1 4" 13'3.5" Hydraulic Cylinders 3 inches 2.5 inches .The second low bid was submitted by·Harron, Rickard & McCone Company, which bid equipment which meets the allowable parameters of the specifications. It is, therefore, recommended that the bid of Milo Equipment Company in the amount of $11,340.00 be rejected and award be made to Harron, Rickard & McCone Company in the amount of $13,786.50, as the lowest and best bid meeting the specifications. WNC:rb q)~4-tt aJ-e William N. Clarke Maintenance Superintendent · Agenda Item #10 L-2 All Districts c '..._; RESOLUTION NOo 71-138~5 INCREASING CONNECTION CHARGES ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NOo 506, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1972 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOo 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, INCREASING CONNECTION CHARGES ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NOo 506, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1972 * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 506 of the District provides that specified increases in sewer connection charges shall become effective on January 1, 1971, and on each succeeding January 1, provided the Directors of the District, by resolution, duly so resolve and direct. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 does hereby resolve and direct as follows: . Section 1. Effective January 1, 1972, the connection charge for new construction~ single dwelling units, as defined by · Ordinance No o 506,. shall be $155 0 Section 2o Effective January 1, 1972, the connection charge for new construction, multiple dwelling units, as defined by Ordinance No. 506, shall be $155 for each dwelling unit. or ·$7.75 for each plumbing fixture unit contained within such construction, whichever sum is less. Section 3. Effective January 1, 1972, the connection charge for new construction, other than dwelling units, as defined by Ordinance Noo 506, sh~ll be $7.75 for each plumbing fixture unit and a minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $17.50. Section 4. Effective January 1, 1972, the connection charge for replacement buildings, as defined by Ordinance Noo 506, shall be calculated on the same. basis as provided in Sections 1, 2 and 3 hereinabove and the credit to be allowed against such connection charges shall be calculated at $155 per dw-elling unit replaced or $7.75 per plumbing fixture unit replaced, whichever sum is more. Agenda Item #27 M-1 District 5 • Section 5. Effective January l~ 1972, the connection charges for additions to or alterations of existing buildings, as defined by Ordinance No. 506, shall be $7.75 for each pli.lmoing fixture unit added and the credit for elimination of existing fixture units shall be calculated at $7o75 per fixture unit. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 10, 1971. Agenda Item #27 M-2 District 5 300 E. CYPRE.SS, BREA, CALIFORNIA 92621 ======== (714) 529-4901 (BREA) TWX 910-596-1213 • • .. · •. (213) 625-5791 (LA.) TELEX 67919 October 15, 1971 Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District No. 2 P. o. Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Cali.fornia 92708 Gentlemen: This letter is in reference to "delinquent charges of $2,057.95" assessed on Kirkhill Rubber Company by the C9unty Sanitation Distr~cts of O+ange County. We wish to request relief from these charges because we feel this penalty is intended for entities which deliberately drag their feet, will not cooperate, or are unsympathetic to the spirit and intent of the prog~am involved • . Kirkhill Rubber Company is none of these. For some time we have recycled some waste water in our plant as a voluntary effort to conserve water. In the photo, you will note several long established cooling towers in addition to the recently installed tower in the foreground. The very day that Mr. Webber explained (very considerately) your program to us, we decided to recycle almost all industrial waste water in our plant. However, to do this, we would have to enlarge our recirculating system. ·As evidence of our interest in the program, and our intent, on the day Mr. Webber was here we ordered (by telephone) the equipment we would need. We were assured the equipment would be delivered to us on or before July 19, in time for us to erect it before any deadlines. But, due to the railroad strike, and damage to the equipment in transit, we did not receive it until August 25. To repair it,and install it, took us through the month of Sept~mber. However, we were so intent on getting the equip~ent operating quickly and properly, that apparently our. paperwork was not given the attention it should have had - -and we passed the deadline without requesting a few days of grace in writing. The recirculating equipment has been working effectively through the month of October in a manner we believe should be of CO.Jllplete satisfaction to the County Agenda Item #37 N-1 District 2 • KIRKHILL RUBBER COMPANY Brea, California Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District No. 2 Page 2 October 15, 1971 and the local community. We are not discharging excess capacity water into the sewer. $2,057.95 is a very severe penalty to a company which did everything huLEnly possible to comply with the intent and spirit of the ordinances relating to indu5trial waste water. We request relief from it. Very truly yours, ~~ R. G. COLVIN / T r e a s u r e r RGC:gkw enclosure -photo ... Agenda Item #37 N-2 District 2 November 10, 1971 -Georgia #5 -See notes of Joint Chairman Called meeting of Executive and Building Comm ittee 6 :00 Novembe r 23 Sims and Hirth invited to attend #6 -FAH reported briefly on graduation ceremony for second OJT program . Program with State Water Resourced Control Board and Environmental Portection Agency to train opera.tors -trained people from 13 different agenc i es -1 3 men graduated, not as large a graduat ion as first one -Another group os man received attendance certifi cates -State fe l t that this program had been utilized to its full extend in this county -will probably move program to another county #7 -Attended symposi/um on ecology -reported on firm shown that at symposium that showed pictures of outfalls and stated in film that there was an abundance of fish around 2£~ ou tfalls but that they were probably unfit to eat . Stated that this is the type of ~~'M:Jn::IM:IX~" a.tti tude general public is exposed to . #11 -FAH gave repor t on activities of staff and engineers aNN X have participated in since last XKXKMMXMXXMXMX~~MXX~~X~XXX~M~ meeting . FAH talked with Executive Off icers of Regional Bo ards re proposed state policy. (San Diego , Los Angeles and Santa Ana) -representatives feel that we have to go into higher degree of treatment (this is the general attitude of their regional boa.rd members .) while funding is a,va.i l able through state and federal agencies . They a.re not concerned about scientific plus 1 es and minuses on this matter . Feel that this attitude reflects public opinion . Discussed this with ~~M his (Mr . Harper 's) counterparts in Los Angeles County , Los Angeles City and San Francisco City . Also discussed the differences between, advantages and disadv~ntages of physical chemical processes verses biological treatment . One difference is biological treatment does take advantage o f various ecol ogical X~ systems avai l able i .e . can be recycled . If lots of ~~QfMX chemicals used trace materials will be left i n processed wastewater and these in themselves can be a K~ real problem . State Board staff is looking at a lime precipitation process . On District new 1 2 mgd facility under construction, if we use lime we will need 32 tons of lime a day. CSSDA agreed to take a position at :SK~X:U:X San Raphae l hea ring on this . Chief Engineer of San Francisco says tha.y are heading toward physical chemical treatmen processes . They do not have enough ladn to bulld activated sludge traatment facilities Nissan -What was position of Los Angeles? FAH -They do not like proposed policy -they are wil us on our position . CSSDA thinks we should submit alternate proposal to the State Board and ~~~llX compare costs or activiated sludge process against what we propose. Parsons -Attended meeting og SCCRP -would like to commend staff -the other agencies have not been kept informed by their staff on new state policy . San Diego, Long Beach, Los Angeles and Ventura County all seem to go along with out policy andX~M~X NB resolution on this matter . They had no idea as to consequences on this new porposed state policy . All a.re goi ng to plead for time to complete SCCRP study . Feels we will have a lot of help from other cities along coastline . Wedaa -Explain taxing information, etc . re federal funding FAH -Senate Bi l l 2770 NK K~N passed out of Senate 83 to O -provides for 7 0% federal funding 1 0% state funding and 20% local agency Bill has some very drastic provisions -feels Districts would like to amend bill -one provision states : 11 of the funds collected we have to establish a revenue program . . . must collect f rom indus try and return to feds to JK~ put back in treasury'' Feels this wi l l involve a good deal of bookkeeping on our part . Required secondary treatment of all wastewater by 1 976 and no dischar ge of po llutants anywhere i n the United Stated by 1 985 . s Just -Should have representatives at each of the hearings one in San Raphae l one in San Diego Could Battin make one of the meetings? Should have resolutions from all d i fferent agencies , i.e . cities and counties asking for a postponement until SCCRP results a.re avai l able for study Would like Parsons , Culver , Mil l er to also attend these hearings Battin -December hearing might be able to attend SEND HIM STUFF ON HEA RINGS FAH -One of our concerns ts to discuss t he other environmental effects ~X~ of physical chemical approach RECOMMEND THAT WE EE AUTHORI ZED TO ENGAGE PROFESSOR MRKEEX MC GAUHEY , UNIVERSITY OF ~CALIFORNIA FIELD LJ\B FOR SANITARY RESEARCH, HEAD OF THIS LAB, CA c · ·~ -rt"v ~..: L l I ·Lr_ :ElXElE Hyde -What would the alt e rnatives that we propose to the State Water Board be? Thinks this would be of interest to the Directo rs . Hunt -Feels that t hings already known to be h armful, requirement s should be set -Feels that we s h ould wait for SCCRP and then set requirements for what we know are harmful but not set the remainder of items stated in policy standards until studies are underway Wedaa -Are we prepared to submit a statement to them toat we will check points concerned and should be able to submit a yes or no answer after SCCRP studies? Parsons -Th ey are preparing interim reports on what theyXN~XKNN know for sure and project wh at they are now study ing . For instance contamination by rivers is one thing now being studyied . Will have compleiB and very large report on everyt hing done so 2f.X far and what is actually underway . I' 'f...· -- I • .... -. • Ir .... &"\! I k . ,-.... . ----- ., .. ' • ~I I• . . Just -Essent ially we should be asking for a one year delay? Parsons -Yes , this is essentially what we want . Fee ls we muct identify what we are doing to the ocean before we can attempt to cure it . Hyde -When we went to new outfall and cut off secondary treatment a. lot of people consider this a. step backward . Feels we must make sure it looks like a request for an extansion of time and not a stalling tactic . ~ris et -No treatment (secondary) cut out -we only cut down on chlorination .. Miller -His und e rstanding that projections of tax rate are based on activated sludge process -feels that it M~MXM should be based n on what state is requiring so that it can be t aken to City Counci ls for comparison Hunt -$35 million figure g i v en last board meeting as amount required to add secondary treatment to what we now h a v e Th is figure was revised for DOF to work with -had to add additional $5®XMXXXX~ID\: 50 million gallons of primary and KM~M~KM~K~ secondary treatment and added to cost per day for building for additional 5 years -~~MXMXXXKxx~rucxx:m!!NX . \ N9&$@ Did this to make figures available for f inancial projections. $65 mil lion total cost expended over 5 y ear period . Capi t al expenditure only , operating cost twice of what is necessary today . Operating cost for ~~XXMX~X maintenance would be higher one state )ijfX p hys ical c hemical process but capital costs would be less . 1 Parsons -Have costs been projected if we went up stream -if we required industry to put in treatment at source so that we would not have to process it? Hyde -®MMXKM~XX~~X~XXKXKXM One good thing on this t y pe of polic y - regardless of where in the United State ±JUiNxxxx1x industry goe s they coul d not escape, like threatening Orange County t h at if their c onnection and discharge requirements were too stringent, they would "take t he ir bus iness elsewhere". M/S Th at Dr . McGau he y be h ired not to exceed $1,000 plus out of poil:.ket expenses M/S Aut h orize Directors a ttendance at two he arings M/s Re solution No . 71-139 Just -Ask each Director to get some action by their City -#12 -Finnell reported on special comm itte e re Director Fee 8~ Schedule -reviewed a number of alternatives regarding this t h at were considered by the Comm i ttee - i t is Comm ittee's recommendat i on .. I I .. • ' that the recommdnations contained in the package be discussed and v oted on at the Decembe r meeting . The Distric ts ' Gene ral Counsel has indicated he would be ~X~M X pleased to meet with any of the Ci ty Attorney 's on thi s mat t er. ~al ternat i ves presented: ~-1'P-- Maintain present compensation Amending fee shhedule Consolidating Sani tation Dis trict wi th costs split equally throughout the District Conso lidating into one Distric t wit h special zones, etc . M/S/DC -Rece i ve and fi le and place on Agenda for XXX XEi§:j'X~llX De c. meeting Sm ith -Discussed advantage s and disadvantages at committee mtg . Sm ith was not absolute l y sold on report -fe l t that Directors also s h ould consider limiting fees to one amount for meeting Finnell -One of problems kicked around by comm i ttee is the fact that these zones would r eceive and recommend the budget for zone 2 for e xample but since we only had one district a majority vote of Distric t board of Direct ors would dec id e -loc al automity could be lost by thi s. Probab~l ity o f this slim but possibili ty does exis t . any Miller -Was there ~MX~ cons ideration of wa y s to strengthen committee group in Districts to s tronger body Finnell -reported that Commi ttee discuss ed Districts 5 and 11 might annex all county l and and then Ci ty Co uncils of Huntington Beach and Newport Be ac h would all become board member s -would increase nu.n ber of directors to approximately 36 members Sm ith -Not opposed to recommendat ion but fee ls this second alternative s hould also b e considered . If we recommend modifying state law we would be he lping solve prob lems in rest of state Committee would only be X:~M:~I~~I~~ recommen ding body a nd feels that this would be the problem -h ave no decisive powe r F innell -On e of reasons committee would not go for the alternative of amending state code was the fact that s i nce it would affect many age ncies other than our own , policial reali ties would prevent or del a y so l ution to o ur problem Hyde -Feels we mu s t do this internally befor e i t is done externally and we have nothing t o say a bout it i f it is done for us . Gri set -mg:~XMXEX ~MXXX~K~XXXXXX IDiXXX~~ Did committee say that they thought one Sani tation NI~XX:I~X would no t vote against another zones zone recommendations Finnell -Ye s this was the feeling of the committee -did n ot fee l that one man would l e ad f ight against tax i ncreas e, etc . i f h e were not actually a repre s entative from that affected area r Smith -Hate to use Board of Supervi sors as an emamp l e , but they vote across representative line~ XM not in line with wishes of those they represent Finne l l -Wou l d have to c onvi nce 1 3 other people to go a.long with h i m instead of two Q§.f[ or three people presently needed Green -M~MXMX~~M Department of Housing and Urban Development has advised SCAG that they want more XKK looking at consol idation of special Districts K~X whereever possible . Feels that feds are X~~XMgX goin g to start c ondi tioning gran ts on this . Feels we better do something ourselves before it is done for u s. Herrin -Trying to get policy making body down to fewer people . Feels this is g~ good . The turn over of directors in recent years have not a l lowed directors to serve enough years to become knowl edgeable . Feels that knowl edgeable peo~l e can serve the Distric t better . #13 -Executive Session 8 :43 reconvened 9 :19 .1 .. #27 Subject to i ncreasefrom feds re price freeze (per CAN) #29 -Report on study being made on connection charges -not complete because Irinve has not decided if large area on coast to be annexed . Irvine Company has said that density would be l o wer t han anticipated -this would requi re a mu ch l arger i ncrease than what we have voted on toni ght -stu~y will probab l y be comp l eted based on assumpti ons XID!LXXKK~~~~MXXMX -will have soon #37 -No provisions for waiving M.MXM~~KIXXliK penalties on which it has been assessed in ordinance -some question has to original billing-done ~MX~~~g~KfilXXX~2ffA~KM on program company was embarked on . The matter should be continued for another month . NMKKX Wedaa -Think that with company like Kirkhil l that has taken steps to improve situation we should waive charges "" .. .. #38 -The staff meet with the two -man director committ~e and sessi on la.ste n three or four hours -they have KKX~X set out several areas that appear in agreement with Riverside Flood Control District to investigate some of the cost and some of the provisions to clarify i n their minds ~X XXXXKXXMXX if it is fair and equitable .Some question in their minds about 10% surcharge , we have included in the charges . Meeting agaunn on the 17th to get into various details of the program . They feel that might be ~~ to agree in pri nciple to the contract at the December ~ meeting . They will sell their bonds on January One of the things this board will have to consider that is the State ~ Water Resources Control Boar d does adopt stri ngent requirements for ocean discharge thi s board may want to consider up stra am facilities since we will be treating their water for discharge into the ocean They are talking about 30 million gall ons capacity . we will then only be a minor contributor to system . Smith -Should a director or two attend one of these meetings • --·: J -· I -. ·--- f • Inf I I r -• .;:n.-· --~ ·~- .. ..I. -· -:s: ........ .., -I I -I ,_ -·~-· l' ~ ... ~ .. #43 -Receive and file letter to be discussed at meeting *?".,?+&*¢%%%$## ~ ... · I ..- (TRANSLATION : ABOUT THIS POINT IN MEETING THE DISTRICT NO . 7 AGENDA ATTACHMENT HASSLE OCCURED -FOR SECRETARIAL SELF PRESERVATION THIS WAS NOT RECORDED) #46 -Nisson r e ported that this wi ll c l ear way District No . 9 to proceed Question : W uld we still have to ID!M~ have permission from county to go into their road? .. Smith -What exactly is hold -up on this? Battin -Awaiting report of planning commission Nisson -has been policy within District always to provide sewers doe:an 't understand problem Nisson -In order to put in Assessment District No . 9 line we either have to have county approval :~rn~x or ? Smith -Move that we proceed with annexation of this small portion of land MS&DC -- J_ . . . . ... 11'" - . .. . ,. ,. .. ,. I -• :i • • I I-. . .. · - / . I -.. I . "' 'Ill •• .. r--... Ir " , -·-.. ... 1. ".:;. '' ~ ,. ._, ... •• i_- .. .. ·. -I I ' ... =· -. _,.,,.. . -.-I a .. -r; .. '·-• . . ·"' . . .-- • .. .. ·~. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA - --· -· - . . P. 0; BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OF'F-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) November 12, 1971 ,_ ., TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-~411 ·To: ALL ACTIVE DIRECTORS ON COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS' BOARDS Pursuant to action taken by the Joint Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts on November 10th concerning tpe proposed State policy for discharge to ocean waters, which contains water quality objectives, discharge restrictions, and provisions requiring additional major capital and operational expenditures by municipal .dischargers adjacent to the Pacific Ocean, the enclosed resolution is being forwarded to you for possible consideration by your City Council qr Sanitary District Board of Directors. The resolution requests the State Water Resources Control Board to postpone establishing new open ocean discharge requirements ·until completion of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project $1.1 ~illion study in October, 1972. . The result of any action by your governing body should be forwarded to the State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Quality Control, Room 1140, 1416 Ninth Street, Sacramento, Cali- fornia 95814, prior to the final hearing date of Dec·ember 2, 1971 · • . If any additional information is desired concerning the proposed State policy~ we will be pleased to supply any available material. FAH:j . Enclosures qf~~~?.f~ General Manager cc: County Administrative Officer City Managers Managers of Sanitary Districts •'"•·· .. :. , .• RESOLUTION NO. 71-139 A RESOLUTION OF THE JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS, REQUESTING THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD TO POSTPONE DECISIONS ON THE · IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPOSED STATE POLICY FOR DISCHARGE TO OPEN OCEAN WATERS UNTIL" THE CONCLUSION OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT STUDIES . WHEREAS, the State Water Resources Control Board proposes to establish general principles, water quality objectives, ·and dis- . . charge restrictions for discharge~ to the open ocean which will. be acceptable to the Environmental Protection Agenc:y-; and, WHEREAS, the proposed State poliC'y contains water· quality objectives, discharge restrictions and minimum level of effluent quality provisions which will require major capital and operational · expenditures by municipal dischargers adjacent to the Pacific Ocean; and, WHEREAS, the Orange County citizen's tax bill will increase 81% to 167% for .service provided. by the County Sanitation Districts; and, WHEREAS, there is not adequate ~cientific information existing to substantiate all·of the discharge restrictions, and ~inimum effluent quality standards stated in the proposed State po.licy; --and, WHEREAS,-in spite of the long history of marine disposal · 'there is relatively little documented information on the influence ····-of-t·reated waste water on the eee-legy--o~ the marine environment; and, WHEREAS, the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project is currently engaged in a $1.1 million study of man's effect on the Pacific Ocean waters of the Southern California coastline. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: .. ·· ·· · ··-··1. That the Boards of Director·s of the County Sani tati·on ·-----··"--·------··~· .. ··-·· Districts subscribe to the State Water Resources Control Board's .•. ·intent to establish a comprehensive ~iform poli~y· to insure the continuing beneficial uses of the coastal waters. 2. That the Boards of Directors of the County.Sanitation Districts request assurances that any State-imposed discharge re~ · strictions or effluent standards be based in fact on some measurable improvement to the marine envirorunent. 3. That the Boards of Directors of the Coun~y Sanitation Districts request that the State water Resources .Control.Board postpone consideration of t.he implementation of re.quirements other .. .. than those that can be substantiated, such as restrictions on known toxic substances, until completion of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project $1.1 million study October, 1972. · PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 10, 1971. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE } I; J. WAYNE.SYLVESTER, Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2; 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and fore.going Resolution No. 71-139 was unanimously passed and adopted at ·a regular meeting of said Boards on the 10th day of November, 1971, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Directors Edward Just {City of Fountain Valley), John Berton {City of La Palma), Jerry Christie (City· of Fullerton}, Robert Clark (City of Brea), Alvin Coen (City of Huntington Beach}, Norman Culver (Garden Grove Sanitary District), Jesse· Davis· (City of Buena Park}, Robert Finnell {City of Placentia), Jack Green (City of Huntington Beach), Lorin Griset {City of Santa Ana), John Harper {City of Fountain Valley), Robert Harvey (City of Cypress), Dexter Hemeon {City of Stanton), Wade Herrin (City of Santa Ana), Edgar Hirth (City of Newport Beach), H. K. Holden (City of Seal Beach), Joseph Hyde (Oity of Los Alamitos), Derek McWhinney {Midway City Sanitary· District), Clifton Miller (City of Tustin), Lindsley Parsons (City of Newport Beach) , Howard Roger_s (City of Newport Beach), Donald Shipley (City of Huntington Beach), Hal Sims (City of La Habra), Don Smith {9ity of Orange), Mark Stephen.son (City of Anaheim)., Henry Wedaa (City of Yorba Linda), Donald Winn {City of Villa Park), and Robert Battin (County Board of SuperVisors) .. NOES: None ______ .-.;.-_ ......... ~ .... -·--.......... _ . -·--~· ~ ...... -.. ~-----.,,. ..... ···----------------------. ··-· IN WITNESS WHEREOF,· r·have hereunto set my ~and this 10th _day of November, 1971 11, of -·---~---:--·-· ____ . L:>cneau.Le .L PROJECTED DISTRICT TAX RATES To· FINANCE Nov. 10, 197!1. FACILITIES TO MEET THE REG,UIREMEI'JTS IN THE PROPOSED STATE POLICY FOR DISCHARGE TO THE OPEN OCEAN ~ Assume 100% Financing _by Districts ---1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 1974~75 1975-76 1976-77 Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected P-rojected District-Tax Ra.te Ta.x Ra.te Tax Rate Tax Ra.te Ta.x Rate Tax Ra.te l $ .39 $ .84 $ 1.11 $ ·1.38 $ 1.01 $ .62 2 .43 .78 .98 1~16 ·."88. ·· .58 3 . 47 .80 . .99 1.16 .89 -.62 5 • 26 ·.55 .71 .85 .62 .38 6 .23 .57 .54 ~-. 94 .66 .38 7 .50 .75 .89 1.01 .80 .60 11 .39 .71 .87 1.01 .77 .52 Total or Average $ .42 $ .94· $ 1. 12 . $ • 85 . . . $ •. 57 . 1.10 • .. 1.0; ! · 1 .• os I 1.00 ·1 1.00 I .9; •9S :•90 -t .90 • .a; > • < ~so 0 0 •• a; > • < .so 0 0 ; .7;. ANT.IC I PATED TAX RATE TO MEET . PROPOSED STATE. RE;QUIREMENTS BY CONSTRUCTING FACILITIES WHICH UTILIZE NATURAL ;.'/S a: &al .70 a. &al .... .6S < a: ")( .60 < r . BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES .;s. v .4S .40 ll ll ll li 72 73 74 . 75 FI SOAL YEAR a: &al a. .70 "" !< .65 ... a: ~ .60 r .ss .so .• 45 .40 1§. 11 11 .. 72 ll 73 ANTICIPATED TAX RATE TO MEET PROPOSED STATE REQUIRl!MENTS ·BY CONSTRUCTING FACILITIES WHICH REQUIRE THE ADDITION Of" COMMERCIAL GRADE CHEMICALS 1l 74 li 7S F' I SOAL YEAR ff . 1§. 77 Schedule II .. Nov • 10, 1971 PROJECTED DISTR~CT TAX RATES TO FINANCE FACIL.L'l'I ES TO J.~~T 'I-HE R:C:QUIREMENTS IN THE PROPOSED STA::L1E ?-JL.!.CY FOR DISCH~RGE TO THE ~;' OPEN OCEAN Assume 20% Financing by Districts and 80% ~inancial Assistance by State and Federal 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 .1974-75 1975-76 1976-77 Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projecte: District Tax Rate Tax Ra.te Ta.x Rate Tax Ra.te Ta.x Ra.te Tax Rate 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 Total 1.00 . .as or Average t.•EET PROPOSED STATE REQUIREMENTS BY CONSTRUCTING. FACILITIES WHICH UTILIZE NATURAL $ $ -8..I CLOG I CAL PROCESSES .39 $ .84 .43 .78 .47 .80 .26 .55 .23 .57 .50 .75 .39 .71 .. 42 $ .76 .40..._ ____ ""------"----------------------11 . . 72 ll 73 ll 74 ll 75 F'ISOAL YEAR 1.§. 77 $ $ 1.00 . .90 •• as > • < Bo ·o • 0 •.1s cc "' 0.. .70 "' ·~ .6S er )( --: .60 .ss .40 .ss $ .78 .80 .55 .57 .75 .70 .76 $' .75 ·$ .46 $ .69 .47 .72 .52 .47 .29 .49 .27 .6·8 -.52 .62 .43 .67 $ .46 $ ANTICIPATED TAX RATE TO MEET PROPOSED STATE REQUIREMENTS BY CONSTRUCTING FACILITIES WHICH REQUIRE THE ADDITION OF COMMERCIAL GRADE CHEMICALS .51 .50 .55 .31 .31 .55 .46 .49 ~------------A.-.-----'--------------ll 72 l?. 73 ll 74 l1 7S Fl SOAl. YEAR 1..€ 77 Wastewater Treatmen Plant Operator On-The-Job Train in g Program G1·aduation Cer emony NOVEMBER 4th, 1971 conducted by COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA under arrangements with the State Water Resources Control Board and the Environmental Protection Agency OPEN I NG ••••oo• JOHN SIGLER, OFF I CE ENG I NE ORANGE COUNTY SAN IT ATION D J OSE 'vl/aC0\1lE ... 0 ... FRED A. HARPER, GENERAL MA WI LL ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION L REMC\PKS •.,. ee u RI CHARD 8UEERiv1.l\NN, EXECU T I SA NT A ANA R I VER BASIN REG I QUALITY CONT~OL BOARD DENNIS 0'lfARY, EXECUTIVE SAN DIEGO REG IONAL •NA TER ( GO~I T :=''J L !:\'J.~.FiD Ro9'£RT DA !·G li , SEN I OR V/ATE t CoNTR0:... ENGlt~EE n: STATC ' .RESOURCE3 CO NTROL BOARD, Josc:P H c.>~r u1D A, ;,·;s:1>i?0 1.1E R D SPEOI AL iST, E N Vt~ONM ENTA AGENCY, REG)ON IX, SAN F F ILM .... eo ... oo• "TALENT SEAnci;tt PRODUCED F EDERAL WATER QUA LITY PRESENTATION OF CERT I FICATESooe ROBERT DAIGH, JOSEPH GANI JOHN S I GLER OTS . RICH. JUHN CTS dC.H!~ C:·J'.f l. I 01·s ARTHU PROGRAV. OPENING ••••••• JOHN SIGLER, OFFICE ENGINEER ORANGE CoUNTV SANITATION DISTRICTS waro,1E ... o ... FRED A. HARPER, GENERAL MANAGER ORANGE CoUNTY SAN1TATION DIST~IOTS REJA~f«S ••••••• RICHARD BUEERMANH, EXECUTIVE OFFICER SANTA ANA RI VER BASIN REGIONAL VlATER QUALITY CONT~OL BOARD DENNIS O'LEARY, EXECUTIVE OFFICER SAN Dr EGO RE GIONAL WA TER QUALITY c o ~IT?OL e o AR!> RoBERT UAl-Gli, SENIOR WATER QUALITY CONTROL ENG I l~EER, STATE WATER . RESOURCES CO ~ffROL BoARD, SACRAMENTO JOSEPH C ,;r~AD A, ~'A 'f ?O W ER DEVELOPMENT $?EOIALIST, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, REG 0ION IX, SAN FRANCISCO FILM •••••••••• "TALENT SEAnaH" PRODUCED BY THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY ADMINISTRATIOH PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATES ••• RoBERT DAIGH, JOSEPH CANADA, AND JOHN SIGLER I I GERTI F I GAITS OF C0\1?L ETICN ------- JOSEPH oor~OVAN W I LL I .f\ilA C q EtvERS RICHARD F. FIELD ~.MTiht:W M. GENZONE ~JC.HM 'l!. ~ . .01/!;( D11.N l E. K . HER1.ll\NSON WI L--,)\J F. HUNll.EY C!· J.J~-~S R. LI GHTT'ER DONCY C. REYNOLDS D/l.N ! E.'_ E. RODRIGUEZ AF:THUR H. SHORT CITY OF ELSINORE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DIST~IOTS " I RV I ll!E qAHOH W.I\ f':.N D 1.s T1~: 1 ~·r ORANGE COUN1't SANITAT l 0N Dl~T~ICTS ~ OP.t.t!COC: COJNTY SANITATION D1sr,10 7s v MAF.CE A IR f :)R'.}E !3ASE MAROh AIR FORCE BASE 0RAMGE COUNT'f S~Nl!ATJON D1srq1crs CtTY OF CHINO · Rua 1 ::.o'JX Co: ·:.m:-.i 1 rv 5ERVl0ES D1s~~1 0T c l 'iY Qi:" ONiAR II) C!TY OF ONTARIO CERTIFICATES OF t.TTENDANCE -.--... -&=-.. __ DANN' ( A. CONaL MICJ-IAEL O. CULBERTSON KE ITH E. DUGGAN JAME S M. ELO CHAR.E S H. ETTER J hJJ;ES L • HE I SKEL STE.JEN W. NAT I ON OHAA_ES W. R'JSE EDWAfU D. SETT JE DALE E. SPARKS c .~.P I snANO BE.a.CH SANlfARY DIST~IOT 0 RAllGE COUhlTV SANITATION D ISTRICTS " CITY OF RIVERSIDE ORANGE Cou1~n SANITA~ION DISTRICTS MAROH A1R FORC~ B~SE CI TY OF SEAL BEAC!i IRV·INE RANCH WATE R DISTRICT CITY OF CORONA c I TY OF CoRc):U, ORANGE· COUNTY SANITATION DiSTRIOT3 OJT Pf[)GRAM OBJECTIVES THE OBJECTIVES OF THE TRAINIHG PROGRAM ARE TO PROVIDE THE TRAI NEE WITH: 1. MOTIVATION TO SEEK FURT HER, THE EDUCATION REQUI RED FOR CAREER DEVELOP MENT IN THE WASTEWAT~R FIELD. 2. ORIE NTATION IN WAT~R SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER TREA TM ENT. 3 • DEVELOP MENT Of' EDUCATIONAL SK ILLS, SUCH AS MATHE MATICS, CO MM UNICATIONS, AND THE SCl~NCES. 4. COORDI NATING EDUCATIONAL SKILLS WITH OPERATING SKILLS. 5. KNOY/LEDGE Of' WASTE WATER TREATMENT PROCESSES. 6. KNO ~IL EDGE Of' LOCAL TREATMENT PLANT DESIGN AND OPERATION. JoHr~ w I LL I AMS TRAINI NG SUPE RVISOR JOHN SIGLER OFFICE ENGINEER MEMORANDUM TO: EDWARD JUST , JOINT CHAIRMAN ftgenda Jtem No: I :L November 5, 197 1 FROM: ROBERT FINNELL, CHAIRMAN, SPECIAL COMMITI'EE STUDYING DIRECTORS 1 FEES SCHEDULE SUB JECT : RECOMMENDATION FOR CHANGES IN THE PRESENT DIRECTORS ' FEES SCHEDULE The following report constitutes the r ecommendations of the special committee appointed by the Joint Boards at the regular board meeting of March 1 0 , 1971 . During thi s period the committee has met on a number of occasions and has requested and received detailed information from both the Sanitation Districts 1 staff and the Districts 1 General Counsel . The committee has reviewed several a l ternat ives whi ch are d i scussed below . (1) Maintain t he Directors 1 compensation at the present level as establi shed by resolution of the individual Districts i n 1967 and 1968 . The special committee concluded that the present fee structure is inequitable and that another alternative shoul d be sought . (2 ) Amend the fee schedule so that those Directors r e presenti n g more than one Dist r ict at a joint meet ing wou l d only receive compensation equal to that of a Director representing a single District. The General Counse l r uled that under the p r esen t Health and Safety Code the Sanitation.District does not have the authority to discriminate in it s fees. This alternative could be achieved, however, by requesting the State Legislature to enact special legis lation . It was the consensus of the special comm ittee that because such legis - l ation would affect a ll sani tation dis tri cts in the State of California, the chances of securing passage of such l egislation were slim . It was also agreed that even if such legislation could be enacted it would be time consuming and would not solve other problems which will be facing the Districts in t he near future . c The special corrunittee does recorrunend, however, t hat if the Joint Boards do nbt agree wi th the committee's r e corrunended alternative, serious consideration should be given to requesting l egislative action to accomplish the reduction of multiple fees to a single Director. (3) Consolidate the various Sanitation Districts into one County Sanitation District with opera- tions, maintenance, and capital out lay costs spl it evenly throughout the new District . Whi l e this wou l d achieve many of the goal s the corrunittee felt were needed, it would create t ax increases in Districts 5, 6, and 7, whi l e lowering taxes in Districts 1, 3, and 11 . It would have no effect on District 2 . The Com - mittee concluded t hat this would not be an equitable distribution of costs and therefore does not recommend this alternative. (4) Consolidate the present Sanitation District s into one County Sanitation District with special zones which would be co-terminus with existing Districts ' boundaries and it would have separate budgets, could issue bonds, and incur bonded indebtedness for improvements and the maintenance thereof within the special zone . In effect, this alternative would provide fo r only one Sanitation District but would allow for special zones which would be the equivalent of the present County Sanitation Districts which would have no effect on the tax rates of each of t he present Districts . The consolidated agencies would act as a single Sanitation District n ow acts . The existing Joint Administrative Organization would be eliminated as would the necessi ty for seven sets of resolutions, minutes, seals, etc ., for joint business . Rather than having Di strict No . 1 act as agent for all the Districts it would merely be one District . There wou l d be no duplication of Directors in that each c i ty within the District, each Sanitary Dist rict now represented, and the County Board of Supe r- vi sors, would have a singl e representative and an a l ternate for a total of 23 active Directors . The corrunit t ee felt that thi s latter point was one which deserved special attention of the Joint Boards . At the present time there are -2 - 29 Directors r epresenting 1 9 cities and 3 Sanitary Districts and the County Boar d of Supervisors . Howeve r, if Dist rict s No . 5 and No . 11 annex presently unincorporated areas, the entire city councils of the Cities of Newport Beach and Huntington Beach will automatically become the Board of Directors for those two Sanitation Districts . Thi s will increase the number of Director s to 36 with two cities having 14 representa - tives voting on matters befo r e the Joint Boards . In addition, if each of the mayors of cities belonging to more than one District should elect a different alternate to repre - sent them in each District, the number of Directors could go as high as 48 . Thi s wou l d more than double the number of Directors wh ich w-0uld be possible under this proposed alter- native . The committee felt that the unwieldy nature of such a large Board ' would be detri - mental to the efficient operations of the Di stricts . Thi s· alternative would a l so have the effect of substantially reducing the number of special distr~cts, an objective formally endorsed by the Orange County Board of Supervisors, the Orange County Division of the League of Ca lifornia Cities, and the Orange County Gr and Jury . At the same time , it would still provide the mechanism for solving local prob l ems by providing for zone committees equivalent to the present Dist rict s ' Boards . Last but certainly not l east, the reduction in Directors fees would amount to a sub - s tantia l savings to the taxpayers of the Districts . The c ommittee recommends the adoption of this alternate plan . It has prepared for the r e - view of each Director, a proposed consolidation agreement . It is r ecommended t hat thi s item -3- b e placed on the December 8 , 1971 agenda for a d i scussion and vote by the membershi p o f the Jo i nt Boa r ds . Respectfully submitted, Ji~~/tl~~// Chai r man Membe r s of the Special Committee : Chairman : Memb e r s : Ex offic i o Membe r s : Robe r t Finnell, Mayor City of Placentia Jo seph Hyde , Councilman City of Los Alamitos Linds l ey Parsons, Councilman Ci t y of Newport Beach Don Smi t h , Mayo r City of Orange Ma r k Stephenson, Councilman City of Anaheim C. Ar thur Nisson , General Counsel Orange County Sanitation Di str icts Edw a rd Just, Joi nt Chairman Or a n ge County Sanitation Dist ricts -4 - , , AGREEMENT FOR CONSOLIDATION DRAFT 9/29/71 This Agreement made in Fountam Valley, Califo"rnia, on _______ day of ~----------------' 19 ___ , by and between COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOSo 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY (each hereinafter referred ~o collectively as "Districts"). W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Districts are organized and existing under the provisions of the County Sanitation District Act • (Section 4700, et seq. of the Health & Safety Code), and WHEREAS, Districts are each engaged in the collection, transporting and disposal of sewage and industrial wastes originating with the County of Orange·, and WHEREAS, Districts jointly own and operate property used for the treatment and disposal of sewage and industrial wastes, and WHEREAS, each District serves a different territory of the County of Orange and owns certain sewerage facilities independent of each other District, and WHEREAS, the territory of all districts together constitute a contiguous territory, and WHEREAS, by agreement districts maintain a single joint administrative organization which administers all of the affairs of each districts, and WHEREAS, by reason of assessed valuations, varying states of development and land us.es, ·each district has different requirements for funding i~s operations, and WHEREAS, many administrative benefits can be derived from a consolidation of all districts into a single county sanitation district, and WHEREAS, the County Sanitation District Act provides for the maintenance of zones within a single county sanitation district (Health & Safety Code, Section 4850-4856, inclusive) which can be maintained to keep existing tax burdens in similar proportions upo~ .consolidation of the districts. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the agreements set forth hereinafter, it is agreed as follows: 1. That the districts will petition for consolidation into one county sanitation district whose territory will include all of the territory now contained within their respec- tive territorial boundaries. 2. The consolidation district, hereinafter called -----6-.~----------- , will be known as 3. When formed, will be divided into zones ----- as authorized under the provisions of Health & Safety Code, Section 4850-4856, inclusive. Said zones will be coterminous .with existing boundaries of each district and sub-committees of the directors will be created to recommend to the whole . board of directors the special improvements and tax re~uirements for each zone. Each sub-committee shall include the directors whose constituencies are significantly included within the zone they are to be concerned with. 4o In determining the revenues needed for each zone within as provided in Health-& Safety Code, Section 4856, the directors shall calculate the requirements for each zone insofar as the operation of -----is dis- tinguished from the special sewerage facilities constructed, maintained and operated to serve the localized requirements of the zones in accordance with the joint ownership, operation and construction agreement dated March 10, 1971, now existing by and between the districts, parties to this agreement~ ·5. The expressed intent of this agreement is to provide the means to ~aintain the existing proportions of the tax burden on the property within e~ch district to be included in the newly consolidated ------ November 10, 1971 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County P. O. Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: H. LAWSON MEAD At:torney at Law 2014 North Broadway · Santa Ana, California 92706 Enclosed herewith is a map showing certain properties which have been shaded and are located between what was the old Chapman Avenue and what is the realigned Chapman Avenue. These properties consist of approximately nine (9) acres and desire to annex to County Sanitation District No. 7. At this time, the county Sanitation District boundaries approximate the old Chapman Avenue. All of this property, except for a few hundred square feet which is located under either the old or the new Chapman Avenue, belongs to the Charles c. Jones, Tr. et al. The owners do not reside within said territory nor are there any registered voters within said territory. Said property consists of the following Assessor Parcels: Assessor Parcel No. 093-150-37 093-150-48 093-150-49 093-150-51 093-150-52 093-150-53 093-150-54 093-150-58 093-150-59 Assessed Value $ 80.00 i.,100.00 260.00 -0- 10, 400. 00 200.00 7,800.00 -0- 70. 00 County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County -2-11/10/71 I respectfully request that these properties be annexed to County Sanitation District No. 7. HLM m enc Very truly yours, W · :J &JA,u~cv-.-~~ H. Lawson Mead ~~©~D.~~.~ {·~ 0\1 1 0 1971 COUNTY SM~ITATION DISTRICTS OE ORANGE COUNTY .. CALIF.a -\ .... * .. ~ .. ~~) ... ~1V°" ( 0 "'" ~ _ .. aJ..Jt. •• st. GO"'• ,_or'\~ o&t' oo"°' C\J ~ .... -· ........... . 92-36 _ .... , ..... ~~'J _._· _...,....'b ~ .~· ~~,2~~ IJIARCH 195/ MARCH 1571 . .. .. ~ .. '. ( POR. SEC. 25, 26, 358 3~ T. 4S., R. 9 W. • ® 121' .!I AC. CITRUS LANDS </.3 ;f 17 ~f -~. 48 # " 0 \. RS ® ,_v 4/ ?6 ..lC. @ I.&"'& 64.6tJ AC. NOTE -ASSESSOR'S BLOCKS• PARCEL NUMBERS 104-01 SHOWN IN CIRCLES M. M. 6-.n D/1 D e-r-,,.. ,,... .. -- _ • J ... ( l§. @ 91.-1? AC. \ I 0) C\J ··v~· j ,,, ~ ASSEsson•s MAP BOOK 93 PAGE IS COlJ/VTY OF ORAN6£ :··-· ., . :i "'· 93-15 IV"> ff') It) ~ \\ , ,. , 600' 3/tl 11 ·,..___..,,. .-.;, .. 1 •; I ~·1 ; '. f~ Agenda Item No. 11 November 10, 1971 Effect on Districts' Tax Rates of Proposed State Policy for Discharge to Open Waters COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 The following notes are relative to the attached data: Cost for construction, maintenance and operation of advanced treatment facilities are reflected. Schedule I assumes 100% financing by the Districts. Schedule II assumes 80% grant financing and 20% financing by the Districts. Does not include capital or operating costs for advanced sludge handling procedures which may be requireq. Projections for District 2 do not consider possible tax increase in .the event up-stream participation in Santa Ana River does not materialize. Projections for District 3 do not consider possible ta.x increase for financing Master Plan collection system facilities. This matter is presently under study. ------~--- District 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 PROJECTED DISTRICT TAX RATES TO FINANCE ADVANCED TREATMENT l1·ACILITIES CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION Assume 100% Financing by Districts Schedule I· Nov. 10, 1971 .• 1 1971-72 Actual Tax Rate .1972-73 1973-74 1974-75 1975-76· 1976-77 $ .39 ·.43 .47 . 26 .23 . 50 .39 . Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Ra.te Tax Rate Tax Ra.te .$ .84 $ 1.11 $ 1.38 $ 1.01 $ .62 .78 .98 1.16 .88 .58 .80 .99 1.16. .89 .62 .. 55 .71 .85 .62 .38 .57 .54 .94 .66 .38 .75 .89 l.01 .80 .60 .71 .87 1.01 .77 .52 Total or Average $ .42 $ ·. 76 . $ .94 $ 1.12 $ ·.85 $ .57 1.15 1.10 1.05 1.00 .90 - •• as '> • · cc .ao 0 0 ;. .7;. a: ~ .. 70 llJ 1-: .65 )( ~ .60 .SS .so o4S AVERAGE TAX RATE .40 _________________________ _._ ____ ~ 11 72 1.Z. 73 ll 74 ll 75 F' I SCAL YEAR 19. 11 Schedule II PROJECTED DISTRICT TAX RATES TO FINANCE Nov. 10, 1971 ADVANCED TREATMENT FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION -~ Asswne 80% Grant Financing & 20% Financing bj7 Districts 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 . 1974-75 1975-76 1976-77 Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected District Tax Rate Ta.x Ra.te Ta.x Rate Ta.x Rate Tax Ra.te Ta.x Rate 1 $ .39 $ .84 $ .85 $ .75 $ .46 $ .51 2 . 43 .78 .78 .69 .47 .50 3 .47 .80 .80 .72 .52 .55 5 .26 .55 .55 . 47 .. 29 .31 6 .23 .57 . 57 .49 .27 .31 7 .50 .75 .75 .68 .52 .55 11 .39 .71 .70 .62 .43 . 46 Total or Average $ .42 $ .76 $ .76 $ .67 $ .46 $ . 49 -~ • > • < 0 0 ~ * tr l!J a. w I-< a: )( < I- ... 1.00 .9s .90 .85' .Bo .1s .70 .65' .60 SS so .4.5' 040 11 72 AVERAGE TAX RATE li 73 .u 74. 1.1 75 F'ISOAL YEAR 12. 77 November 10, 1971 Excerpt from Proposed State Policy for Discharge to Open Waters D. MINIMUM LEVELS OF EFFLUENT QUALITY ·' . The minimum levels of effluent quality specified herein are applicable to discharges meeting the requirements of sections C-1 and C-2. 1. Physica.l Characteristics a. Settleable solids concentration shall not·exceed 0.1 ml/l more than 50 percent of the time nor 0.2 ml/l more than 10 percent of the time. b. Suspended solids concentration shall not exceed 30. mg/l more than 50 percent of the time nor 40 mg/l more than 10 percent of the time. c. Turbidity shall not exceed 30 TU more than 50 percent of the time nor 50 TU more than 10 percent of the time. d. Floatable solids shall not be present in the effluent. 2. Chemical Characteristics a. pH shall be within the limits of 6.o to 9.0 at all times. b. Grease concentration shall not exceed 10 mg/l.more than 50 percent of the.time nor 15 mg/l more than 10 percent of the time. 3. Toxicity Characteristics a. The toxicity of undiluted, unchlorinated effluent shall permit not less than 50 percent survival of test animals after 96-hour exposure 50 percent of the time, and not less than 30 percent survival of test animals after 96-hour exposure 10 percent of the time. · b. The following concentrations shall not be exceeded: ·concentr~tion iil..ffi.9/l Arsenic Cadmium Chromium (total) Copper Lead Mercury .Zinc Cyanide Phenolic Compounds ·Total Chlorinated Hydrocarbonn 1\rrunonia ( N) . 50°/o of time 10% of time o.s 0.01 o.s 0.1 0.1 0.005 o.s 0 .• 1 0.5 0.001 25 1.0 0.02 1.0 .0 .2 Oo2 0.01 1.0 0.2 1.0 0.002 40 RESOLUTION NO . 71-13 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE JOINT BOARD S OF DIRECTOR S OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS, REQ UESTI NG THE STATE WATER RES OURCES CONTROL BOARD TO POSTPONE LZC I SIONS ON THE IMPLE MENTATION OF THE PROPOSED-STATE POLICY FOR DISCHARGE TO OPEN OCEAN WATERS UNTIL THE CONCLUSIO N OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTA L WATER RESEARCH PROJECT STUDIES WHEREAS , t he State Water Resourc es Control Boa r d proposes to establi sh general principl es, water quality obje ctives , and dis - char ge restricti ons for discharges to the open ocean which will be acceptable to t he Environmental Prot ection Agen c y ; and , WH EREA S, the proposed State policy contai ns water qua lity obj ectives , discharge r estrictions and minimum l evel of effluent quali ty provisions wh ich will r equi r e major capital and operational expenditures by municipal discharge r s adj acent to the Pac i f ic Ocean ; and , WH EREAS , th~ Or ange County citizen 's tax bil~ will increase by 81% to 167% for servic e provi ded by the County Sanitation Districts; and, WHEREAS, there is n ot adequate scientif ic i nformation existing to substanti ate all of the dis c.har ge r es tri ct i ons , and minimum effluent quality standar ds s tated in the proposed State policy ; and, WHEREAS, i n spite of the l ong history of ma r ine disposal there ts relatively little documented i nfo r mat i on on the influence of treat ed waste wate r on th e ec ology of t he ma rine envi ronment; and, WHEREA S, the Southe r n Ca lifo r nia Coastal Wa ter Resear ch Project is current l y engaged in a $1 .1 million study of man 's effect on the Pacific Oc ean waters of the Southern Ca lifo rnia c ·oastline . NOW , THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS : 1 . That the Boa r d s . o f Direc tors of t he Coun t y Sani ta ti on Di stricts subscribe to th e State Wa ter Resources Contro l Board 's intent to establish a comprehensive uniform policy to insure the ...... continuing beneficial uses of the coastal waters. · 2. That the Boards of Directors of.the County Sanitation '.._) ·Districts request assurances that any State-imposed discharge_ ·re- . . strictions or effluent -standards be based in fact on some measurable improvement to the marine environment. 3. That the.Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts request that the State Water Resources Control Board postpone consideration of ~he implementation of requirements other than those that can be substantiated, such as restrictions on known toxic substances until completion of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project study in October, 1972. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 10, 1971. I~ ·I ! B,y JOE _\IUHONEY I are coslJy.· In addition to a S35f our plants to sea, and the best/underground to preH?nt conta· Ht•gistcr Staff Writer million capital impron:mcnt l way to diminish the flow is at 1 mination of Orange County wa· FOUNTAIN VALLEY-The 'joutlay, th<! cost of operating the 11 its source." . tcr wells by sea water. Orange County Sanit.P.tion Dis-plants wouid· rise f:O per cent, The smaller or the county's If the proposed state PQlicy is tricts :innounced Tlml'sday itjlh?.Y said... 1 two disposal ~lants, . loc~ted adopted. the Fm.:ntain Valley would cost S05 million to en-1 In add1t1on to the secondary;hcre. already gives b10Jog1cal I plant \\'ill have to be enlarged, large tho county's two sewagej treatment, we \';oul<l have to j treatment . to about half the 1 but it is at the Huntington disposal plants to compiy with a. put new restrictions on ind us-! WR Ste water it takes in. The! Beach plant, twice as b~g as propos·e. d state policy for im-l try,'' a c~unty engineer said. treated product is used for agri-1' this one, that the main financial proving the quality of numicipall '· IJJ(iustry ts the source of the cultural irrigation and in the outlay would have to be made, and ir14:luslrial waste water clis-lchemicals whkh pass through water barrier being erected engineers say. chargt<i: into the ocPan. ! ·_ Evc1i \rith federal and state! rn·~~ financiai aid, thj::; v:onld mean! ~ an incrca~e of more then 1(:0 · r; per cent in the c:mmty's sewa~·c·: U disposal tax. said Fred A. Har-j ~ per, gc:!1er<ll manager of the! ~ county district..;;. The tax now is! ~ $.42 per Sl 00 of .3.-;scssed valua-; I lion. or roughlv. SI~; a month per · household. ~ Tho REGISTER Friday (m) October .29, 1971 Dl ~ .J· The proposed policy, dr:lfted ~ Ocl 15 by lhe State \Vater Re·:.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. ;ourccs Control Board, will be . the subjc'ct of hearings in the :Marin County Civic Center in :San Rafael at 10 a.m. Nov. 18 and at the 'f own and Country Hotel, San Dit:go, at the same hour Dec. 2. Agencies wishing to be heard have been asked to submit \\Tit- ten statements to the board at · 1415 Ninth Street, Sacramento, · prior to the hearing dates. The policy, folrnwing a guide- line published July 13 by the U.S. Environmental C o n tr o 1 Agency, is highly technical in nature. Its gcneml purpose is to prevent contamination of the ocean environmeht and adja- cent shores by sewage. With it is a set of regulations, all but one of which, said Har- P<'r, alrcncly is being observed by the Orange County districts. It is this one which would cause all the expense-for it demands secondary or "ad\·anced" treat- ment or all water to be dis- charged into the sea, whereas ·the two Orange County plants 'are equipped to give only pri- mary treatme11t to the bulk of water received. Engineers sny primary treat- ment, a process of sedimenta- tion. rcr.10\'~'s r.o to fi:l per cent of all solids containn.l in sewage. Th!s does not include suspended materials, most C\f which may be nracticallv invisible. These su;pendt•d materials, the engil1(,'Cl'S say, can be treat- ed or rf>moved only by biological .J I• 1. i ·--... ----:~·· .. --~-..,------,.-~-.... -.·-. -·--~------·--··--·-- Plans to Upgrade Treatment ~f Wastes Could l=like Taxes . Officials of County Sanitation Districts Question. If State Proposal to Protect Ocean Would Acco~hsh Goal \ \ \"{\ G-:> .BY LARltY PUYOit \ ~ \ \ ·] \ · Times Slaff Wrllcr \'VD~ ':" ,. 'I~ v :\LLEY-A pro-both f hr: timi_ng and effectiveness of FOU~T.~ · • l, .. ~te p1 11cy 1 • • t rrrade treat-ne :.; _., ' • . . posed state po.icy o ~1 P~ . he ''\L're nnt. objecting to doing mcnt of wastes to be num!J~r~tlnn~ial <:."omci.hinr.r a bout the problem," said ocean could represent a ,:,u J: ~ ~-i··recl J-l;;!~per, general manager of tax increase to Orange Com,t) ~et:::i tl"'e cli"-::ti·i·ct:;; "bttt \\·e want to make · l' rr t county sam a-· · ~ • e~ents .. "~~core mo 0 'sure the co~t is worth it a1.1d that w; t10n offlc.:1als. . . are nctually getting the Jnb done. 'The official,;; further quc:-,tIOn rfhe riiajm· muniripaJ cii~charges whether ~teps prn1~0.3cd by the. St~~~ along-the ·southern California coast Water Ilesourc~s Control Boaid '' 1 nut about a billion gallons of treated protect the e1wironmcn~. . \va~tc \\·ater into the ocean e~ch da~. The policy is prima1:1ly ~1n:cd ~t En~incers in Los • .\ngclcs est~mate it preventing toxic matenals i.n mdu;-i-\\·ould cost the entire region be- trial wastes from rcachrng the tween S.JOO to S600 million to meet ccean. the propo:;cd stan~ar~ls. • Policy Stated ,John Carollo },ngmcers, consul- "Waste water treatment ::ystems tants to the County Sanitntion J?i?- shall provide essentially complete tricts, estimate it would co.st a mim- removal of environmentally hazar-mum of $35 million in Orange Coun- dous substances which cannot .. be · ty. 1ntrolled at the source," the poncy '--'fates. ,. b 1f those sub~tances cant e re· moved economically by the treat- ment process, they will ha\·e to be p1'tvented from entering the sewer system. Industry would either have to pretreat its wastes or stop produc- tion .• 'fhe proposed policy wo~1ld include remo\"al of su~p2nded sollds and. va- rious toxic materials, from arsemc to zinc. . . It also requires sewage tox1c1ty be checked in the laboratory through a bio-assay test which times the survi· · val rate of test fi5h. Tax Rate Increase This would mean a jump in the districts' tax· rate next year from 42 cents per SlOO (lf assessed valuation to DG. cents. If f cclcral and state matching funds of up to SO% of con- struction costs were received, the tax rate would stabilize at 54 cents, in 1!)7-1 according to the sanitation di.::trict.~. )!air.tcnance and operating costs would rise from S2.3 million this year to $.).4 million by 1975, officials said. Before committing themselves to expenditures of this scale, they said th~v would prefer to wait ·until the con1plction of a three-year study . dfreclt)iolo!!kal effects he- cau~e of thl'ir increasing , . --- : .... -:. ·~·;-.:· .. '<':-~;--: tliey ha\·-e ~nelb1"if finartL'~: concenf!·::ttinr.;.;.'' ·.to discover the efff'c:t.s or' Siiit:t! 1 he dama,l.!e ma\· . be impo,,_..:iblc to ri.~~e.:;~_:_ sewage on the ocean. until it L.; ton la IP-the "Rcgu l~tinns like this nn ·only a pprn~rh to t:1 ke is longer gi ,.e you a ch;:ince the mo:-::t r·;;ut inm; one, the to find ni1t what the exact staff notr.d. Parsons d i::<l~rccs. ~ problems are in the ocean "The:'e directives are . I or I he w~ys tn soh·e being handerl down with- : them," H. H~1Tey Hunt of· out any conclu5i\·e · Carollo Enginee1·s told the . eYidence we are rloing . districts' b~~rd last week. : an.~thing to the ocean,11 he . 11·1·h . . t rl . sa1 . . ere J.3 no· enou.t. 1 ~ Allhough the c\'idenc·e is evidence of what we are : skimpy. there h<n·e h':.'rn doing to I he ocean," said ; ~igns all is nnt well off the Sanitation Di.'tricts Direc-· coa~t. to Lindsley Parsons. "Six Se\·eral 5tudi~~ . ha\. e r ~ noted an as=-:oc1at1on-as month:; frnm now we may vet. not unrlcrstoorl-he- find this policy is unneces-. 'tween fi~h rleformit i£'~ anci sar;v." i pollution. System;1tic :;am- . I . plfng of fi~h· off the coun- Confrolling Disc large '. tv's -coa~t ha\·e ::-hown an Hunt ~aid ii tn:dc mater-· a·bnnrmally hi.zh percen- ial~ are the problem, the ta~e ha\·e le:::inns anrl tu- mn.4 effocth·e ·,\·ay lo rleal morous growth~. as well as "·it h them i.~ to contrnt1 gill, .fin and skeletal defor- t hf-'ir rlischar~e into th~-· mi ties. ,::\·:'tem, rathe1· than up-Higher Ratio ~;~·rarling. treatment. One ~lurh· shn\\'rd the The district..; di.:·::chargc orohahilitY · nf finding ci ~:;bout 1:is million gallons fish in ra·lif0rni;i \\'ith·-.rn~· nf ;'ewage a rlay into tli~ deformit.v i:; Ri.:-,~;, a.:; ocean, of \\'hic:h :~:; of 4<Y(, compared to .)~~ in :\Icxi-; i!=' of inrlu~trial origin. co. ~lo::;t of the flow. R:-,,;:..,. n·-". Hnwe\·er. 1hen• i:-; nn c0h·f'c; 0:11.v primary trcC1t'.; l,,·iriE'nce Y<'t that the cle- ment, a rhy~ical prm:c~~ 1Jf formltie.~ ·<ire rauscd l"· screrning-and sedimenta-w.:iste r!L,chcir,ge~. • tion that rcmo\·cs some of The ~tale hoard \\'ill hn!d the :::olid~. a hearing at San Tiafael The other 1;,r·;, rrc~ch~t'S Xm·. 18 tn ~et C'Olnn1{'ntf' I secondan· treatment in" on its propo;('d polie~-. The which h~rtcria remm·e a SRnitation Di..:trids will higher percentage of the prohahly ask fnr a dcl:.ty in solid:;. the implemrntation of the The \\'at er J\e:-:ources policy.until the comple- Control 8nrird :-:t;:i ff takes tion of it~ ~t urh·. the apprna<'h that the ma-The ctistric:t~ officials rine e1wironment is too said they would al::o a~k · com p I ex to acniratel~· the $late to be more ~peci mea:;ure or predirt the cf-fie in \\·hat ir w~s tr)·ing to feet~ of discharges of toxic achie\·e. Sanitation officials said they are not opposed to keeping toxic mat~ri als from the ocean, but question Please Turn to Page 7, Col. 1 Hthstancrs. 1t might he pn:-:sihle .. ::\loreO\·cr. aeconling-to a · Harper said. tn ~nh·e a spe- paper pt·<':-entcd h~· the cific problem. :'Uch ris t.oxi- •. staff ]<isl month; ''changes canf .::. without going· to! \,,. in marine life characteri~-sec011datT treat mrnt and : ticalJy OCC'lll° l'O !')OW)\' that spr-nrling-' n) million. ..... ·"'~·~·- ~ they 0 may he detcctecl only On 1 he nthrr hand. he : : over Jong periods of time. said. the districts might ~o : nctrction Difficult ahE"Rd rinrl im·C':'t in sec~n-· · " ,1 . · . .· .· . .· h dar~· trratm~nt and find . ( 11 ornc t?x~c ll.\ • \\ ll that the problem still ex- its charneten.'tll'ctlly ::-t~h-; htecl. · . tie, sub.leth~I.. Jong-term: "This might hf' ;;mother ! effe~1ts; ts rl1ffl~t!lt to rle-p h ·0 5 p ha ·t e thing th.:it ; tee~._ ti.if' ~taff :-an!. cfJuld 20 full circle.'' said : "l nx1c~mts rlnd, mn~t ~ _ ·::. . . 1, 1 . l F~r.:on~. · · : !l'lll<:<l .y, :-:ynt 1E't1c ma er-.--·· ial::; in mC1rine en\'iron-· · · · · ments ma·:'<. be expected to . ha\:.e~._eit!l~r direc.t ·~n.r_J11;..4 ( New Proposals 011 Sea Sewage.Questioned; ( ( Bv ALAN DIRKIN oi the DllilY Piiot Staff Cities in Orange County are expected to join with the Or:rngr Co u n t y Snnitation Di strict in serkir.g a re-ex· aminatiori of a proposed new stnte policy on the dis~harge .of scwnge in the ocean. Sanitation engineers a r e questioning whether the new prnpos~ls will be eff cctive and :m~ fretting over the cost of ne.\' equipment that will be nc!~dcd, at lc::ist $35 million worth, according to t h e cli~trict s consultants, John Catollo Engineers. 1\. 128 percent· jump in the district's average countywi<Ie ta~: rate from 42 cents per $100 of assessed valuation to 96 cents is predicted to pay for the incrf'used cnpital costs. Basically. the new policy of the St:ite Water Resources Co.1trol Board is intended to prc·vent toxic industrial wastes Cind solids from being dumped in :he ocean. Improved chemical treat- ment proccs~cs are proposed but if any of the solid waste material can't be removed then the new policy would pre· \·cr:t the discharge or the sut.stnnces into the sewage system. forcing industry to pretrcat wastes or modify or stop production. ''The question we arc con- sid<'ring is what good will the new policics achieve as far as the marine environment is concerned, said Ted Dunn, S4rnitation district director of operal.ions and the laboratory. He pointed out that research haci not yet shown that ocean life was harmed by sewage discharges. "Another point we question is a physical chemical treat. ment method the state is pro- posing to do the job. It will not work." Dunn said that the sanita- tion district was not in conflict with the state over the need to prevent toxic materials en- tering the ocean but doubted the eff ectivcness of the b.:1n on the discharge or solids. "And nobody is paying much attention on wh:it should be done with the solids if they can't be put i!l the sea," he added. "Either they are put back on the land or sent up in- to the atmosphere for in- cineration." The Newport Beach City' Council has asked the state hoard to delay imposition of the new policy pending com- pletion of a study by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, a three-year study still a year from completion. C o u n c i l m a n Lindslcv Parsons, a sanitation district director and vice presider.t of the research project, told fellow councilmen recently, "Nobody wants to pollute the ocean but nobody has done a studv to know whether we are.;, The engineering r e p o r t predicts a $35 million in- vestment in new equipment by 1974 with annual mnintcnance costs rising from $2.3 million this year to $5.4 million by 1975. "It appears that these runds could be better expended in the waste water pollution con- trol field on recognized pollu- tion problems with known solutions," Parsons wrote in a letter to Sen. Alan Cranston (D-Calif) .. This week the Huntington Beach City Council instructed its attorney to coordinate ef • forts to delay implementation of the program with other cities and the s a n i t a ti o n district. This action was proposed by Councilman Coen, a n o t h e r sanitation district board mem- ber. The stale board hos called for hearings on the new con- trols at S.m Hafael Nov. 18 and in San Diego Dec. 2. Jerome B. Gilbert, executive officer of the state board, s:iid that the .reasoning behind the objections of the sanitation engineers· were no longer germane since the f edcral government hod d c c i d e d stronger . controls were re- quired. The new state policy was designed to meet the new · federal standards at lesser ex- pcnse. He did not believe the im- plementation of the policy could be delavcd. ' ' T h e Federal government h a s already decided that there shall be no discharge of sludge, large quantities of solids, into the ocean," he said. "There is an awful lot of evidence that we need major improvements in treatment disposal," Gilbert continued. ''While it has not been con- clusively demonstrated that currcnl waste discharges have caused a change in the number and diversity of fish there are a lot of people who believe it has." He said that large quantities of DDT and a higher percen- tage of mercury have been traced at some outfalls. · "If we wait till we can prove we have a problem then we may have waited too long to do anything about it," Gilbert added. DAILY PILOT Gilbert pointed out that! federal and state grants would be available for the progra1:1 to provide 80 percent of the re- quired funds. but claimcrl f.hat even if no grants .we.re available the cost would not be prohibitive to the average homeowner. J. Wayne Sylvester, thel sanitation district's finance director, said that with the average tax rntc at 42 cents the owner of ia $25,000 home was paying $2G.25 a year for sewage di.sposal. If the rate was increased to the estimate of 96 cents the annual bill would rise $33.75 to $60. • RESOLUTIONS & SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS November 10~ 1971 -7:30 p.m. ---~ WARRANT NO. 16600 16001 1_6602 W603 it>604 16605 16606 16607 16608 16609 16610 16611 16612 16613 16614 16615 16616 16617 16618 16619 16620 16621 16622 16623 16624 16625 16626 16627 -~628 ~629 16630 16631 16632 16633 16634 16635 16636 16637 16638 16639 16640 16641 16642 16643 16644 16645 16646 16647 16648 16649 16650 16651 16652 ., t;653 ~654 16655 16656 16657 16658 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF. Active Trucking Service, Freight $ All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings Allied Bolt & Supply Co., Small Hardware Hilary Allison, Employee Mile~ge Bank of America, Bond & Coupon Collection American Chemical Society, Technical Journal City of Anaheim, Power The Anchor Packing Co., Gaskets Alpine Aromatics, Inc., Chemicals American Compressor Co., Compressor Parts Amoco Chemicals, Lab Supplies Azusa Western, Inc., Concrete Beacon Auto Parts,·Inc., Truck Parts Bearing Specialty Co., Pump Parts John G. Bell Co., Air Cylinder James Benzie, Employee Mileage Kris Lindstrom, Pathology Course MO ·10/13/71 A. Biederman, Inc., Gauge · Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Engine Parts Brenner-Fiedler & Associates, Valves Bristol Park Medical Group, Pre-employment Physical Bruner Corp., Water Softener C & R·Reconditioning Co., Compressor & Pump Parts California Collator Sales, Binding Castle Controls, Inc., Valves Central Mobile Home Movers, Relocate Mobile Office Certified Laboratories, Inc., Solvents College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Supplies· Compressor Systems, Inc., Compressor Repair Concrete Coring Co., Concrete Coring Consolidated Electrical Distr., Electrical Supplies Constructors Supply Co., Small Tools Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck.Parts Costa Mesa County Water Dist., Water Clarence c. Cummings, District Inspection Services Curtin Scientific Co., Lab Supplies D/C Concrete Pumping Service, Concrete Pumping Daniel Industries, Inc., Valve Ducommun Metals & Supply, Bronze Stock Dwyer Instruments, Inc., Gauges Wilber R. Eads, Employee Miieage Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring Engineers Sales-Service Co., Pump. Parts Farr Co., Filters:· Fischer & Porter Co., Telemetry Supplies Fisher Controls Co., Regulator Parts Fowler Equipment Inc., Equipment Rental City of Fountain Valley, Excavation·Permit William H. Fox, Employee Mileage Fredson, Battery Switches Freeway Machine & Welding Shop, Machine Gasket G. W. Maintenance, Inc., Small Hardware Gaines Electric Supply, Electrical Supplies Garden Grove Lumber & Cement, Building Supplies Gasket Mfg. Co., Gaskets · Gelco Grouting Ser.vice, Pump Rental Geller's Ready Mix Concrete, Cement General Electric Supply Co., Electrical Supplies ' A-1 AMOUNT . .. 7.10 . 140. 62 i21.98 13.80 422.37 ·9.00 25.00 119.01 546. oo· 243.33 151.98 661.53 109.11 161.47 155.91 55.01 41.50 27.16 13.86 196.74 12.50 995.40 370.00 . 19. 94 82.43 150.00 80.06 89.07 889.66. 43.00 341.04 1,622.71 503.87 6.00 1,147.15 9i1.54 175.00 71.09 151.09 66.88 9.75 207.25 1,800.00 325.82 46.87 468.62 40.93 351.75 12.00 16.50 40.07 48.oo 29.66 1,094.21 238.72 212.15 300.00 52.49 80.19 WARR.ANT NO. 16659 16660 16661 166'62 1-6663 .664 'm'665 16666 16667 16668 16669 . 16670 16671 16672 16673 16674 16675 --16676 16677 16678. 16679 16680 16681 16682 16683 16684 16685 16686 16687 16688 . ~589 ~690 16691 16692 16693 16694 16695· 16696 16697 16698 16699 16700 16701 16702 16703 16704 16705 16706 16707 16708 16709 16710 16711 16712 16713 .. "714 ~15 16716 16717 16718 16719 IN FAVOR OF General Telephone Co. $ Georgia-Pacific Corp., Chlorine Gladman & Wallace, Truck Tires SCM Glidden-Durkee, Paint Supplies Golden West Fertilizer Co., Bob Gosche Co., Small Hardware Graybar Electric Co., Electrical Supplies Hach Chemical Co., Inc., Test Equipment George T. Hall Co., Inc., Boiler Parts Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting & C.O.D. Expenses Hewlett-Packard Co., Lab Supplies Honeywell, Inc., Charts & Switch Repair Howard Supply Co., Small Hardware & Piping City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Beach Equipment Rentals, Equipment Rental International Harvester Co., Truck Parts Irvine Ranch Water Dist., Water Johnston Pump Co., Flow Pump . Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies . Keuffel & Esser Co., Reproduction Supplies King.Bearing Inc., Engine Parts Kittell Muffler & Engineering, Fittings Kleen-Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Tools & Hardware LBWS, "Inc., Welding & Lab Supplies L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform.Rental The Lacal Co., Pump Packing Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Filter Lawless Detroit Diesel, Blower Repair Judy Lee,. Employee Mileage · Lewis Bros. Battery, Batteries Link Belt, Dewateri.ng Equipment H. J. Lorenz Co., Piping R. w. McClellan. & Sons, Plaster Sand Majestic Fasteners Co., Small Hardware Mesa Supply, Truck Parts Millipore Corp., Lab Supplies Model Glass Co., Mirror E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Covers Herbert A. Moss, Special Labor Counsel Nalco Chemical Co., Chemicals Newark Electronic, Electronic Supplies Newport Skyways, Inc., Aerial Photo Charter c. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel Retainer City of Orange, Water Orange County Radiotelephone Oreo Block Co., Building Supplies Pacific Pumping Co., Pump Pacific Telephone Co. M. C. Patten & Co., Inc., Piping Pneumatic Machinery Co., Valves Postmaster, Postage Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage Radio Products Sales, Inc., Electronic Tubes Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Hauling Red Valve Co., Inc., Pump Parts Bernard T. Redican, District Inspe~tion Services Repco Englneering, Inc., Heat Exchanger Repair Rhodia, Inc., Chemicals Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Parts Sacramento State College Foundation, T'echnical Manual A-2 AMOUNT 1,680.38 11;747.04 19.05 . 106. 22 1,008.oo 157.98 570.70 35.70 157.37 152.02. 40.95 435.99 2,297.06 57.52 70.65 57.16 1.50 3,245.00 2,245.95 42.75 357.50 228.38 102.01 . 79. 53 986.52 1,524.17 51.76 56.18 36.86 21.45 181. 75 . 1,225.45 210.00 52.50 421.70 234.05 207.40 18.90 468.30 250.00 173.25 121.72 25.20 .700.00 9.03 340.61 20.48 1,554.53 388.30 22.37 78.35 300.00 53.46 108.24 90.00 337.68 1,264.05 633.71 294.00 81.77 12.60 WAHRANT NO. 16720 16721 16722 167?23 J6724 '-'725 Th726 16727 16728 16729 16730 . 16731 16732 16733 16734 16735 16736 16737 16738 16739 16740 16741 16742 16743 16744 16745 16746 16747 16748 16749 \ ... ~'-750 n>751 16752 16753 16754 16755 16756· 16757 16758 16759 16760 16761 16762 16763 16764 16765 . ;-766 ~67 16768 16769 16770 16771 IN FAVOR OF Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing $ Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Rewind Sargent-Welch Scientific Co.·, Lab Supplies Scientific Products, Lab Supplies Sherwin-Williams Co., Paint Supplies A. H. Shipkey, Inc., Truck Tires & Tubes John Sigler, Employee Mileage & OJT Instruction Singer-Friden Division, Office Supplies South Orange Supply, Small Hardware Southern California Edison Co. Southern California Gas Co • Southern California Water Co. Southwest Flexible Co., Equipment Rental Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water Speed-E-Auto Parts, Truck Parts Stanco Mfg. & Sales, Inc., Truck Parts Standard Oil Co., Gasoline John w. Stang Corp., Pump T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Tractor Parts Tony's Lock & Safe, Locks Paul Torres, Employee Mileage Tustin Water Works, Construction Water U. S. Equipment Co., Compressor Parts Vaniman Camera, Photo Processing & Supplies VWR Sclentific, Lab Supplies John R. Waples R~s., Odor Consultant Ward & Harrington, Lumber Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Repair Robert A. Webber, Employee Mileage Western S~It Co., Salt · Westinghouse Electric Corp., Electric Cart Parts Willig Equipment, ~ruck Parts Wilson Engine & Equipment Co., Engine Parts Russ Wold , Employee Mileage World Travel Bureau, Inc., Meeting & Conference. ·Travel Don Wright, Employee Mileage Xerox Corp., Reproduction Supplies Zodiac, Reproduction Supplies Coast Insurance Agency, Liability Insurance Premium John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services AMOUNT 5.88 .. ~288.03 200.04 .. 65.14 135.37 178.44 1,147.70 56.26 23.49 1,022. 00. 1,418.38 6.52 315.00 67.62 183.44 26.96 630.56 561.75 137.03 77.59 40.98 602.95 870.25 207.38 242.01 244.00 635.46 425.46 . 15. 75 32.03 348. 86 . 185.84 169.85 173.04 129.60 73.86 877.00 132.62 4,216.00 1,581.63 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING $ 71,530.41 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF James G. Biddle Co., Test Equipment John Carol lo Engineers, Engr. Serv. ·-Plant Const. Constructors Supply Co., Machine Equipment Daily Pilot, Bid Notice Pl-12-5A William P. Ficker, A.I.A., Architect J-13 Freeman Electric Construction, Contractor Pl-6-1 General Electric Supply Co., Contractor Pl-6-lA J. Putnam Henck, Contractor P2-17 J. E. & W. w. Hoagland, Contractor P2-19 E. T. I. and Kordick, Contractor P2-ll-l B. H. Miller Const. Co., Contractor J-7-2/J-12 Charles Meriam Co., Test Equipment · A-3 $ 294.90 28,176.07 1,332.28 16.57 1,755.00 34,947.00 49,177.80 114,527.99 114,056.73 33,156.00 6,477.30 232.63 WARRANT NO. 16772 16773 16774 16775 16776 16777 ~778 Th779 IN FAVOR OF Moline Malleable Iron Co., Sprokets $ Reed Electric Sales & Supply, Tools Saunders & Co., Lawn Mowers & Edgers Speed-E-Auto Parts, Tools Richard Terry & Associates, Environmental Impact Study Healy Tibbitts Const. Co., Contractor I-7-3 Twining Laboratories, P2-17/19, I-7-3 & Pl-6-1 F. T. Ziebarth, Contractor Pl-1R-l/P2-1R-l AMOUNT 10;995.92 183.84 ··~955.75 103.95 i·,3.66. 66 15,387.62 756.60 52,134.75 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING $ 466,035.36 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF A-4 DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WAR~ANT NO. IN FAVOR OF ~7 80 Lowry and Associates, Reclamat~on Plant Study 16781 16782 16786 DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Cook & Barletta, Release Retained Percentage 3-15 c. Arthur Nisson, Legal Services, Amercoat Suit ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering Ser;ices 3-16, 3-18 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-16 Merco Construction Engr., Contractor 3-16 DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 3-17 DISTRICT NO. 5 . FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF County of Orange; Compaction Testing 5-18 Zurn Engineers, Release Retained Percentage 5-18 -B- .. ~ AMOUNT $ 6,141.80 $ 8,620.08 248. 75 $ 8,868.83 $ 8,697.75 782.28 79,,234.11 $ 88,714.14 . $ 97, 582 • 97 $ 11,465.00 $ 55.33 32,756.30 $ 32,811.63 i WARRANT NO. i./'89 16790 16791 16792 16793 16794 16795. 16796 16797 16798 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering ·Services Maridayle Thompson Peay & Norvada Land Co., Refund Annexation Processing Deposit CONSTRUCTION FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF County of Orange, Compaction Testing 7-6-1, 7-6-2 Security Title Insurance Co., Title Search-7-6-3 The Tustin News, Bid Notice 7-6-4 DISTRICTS NOS.· l & 7 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engr. Serv. 1-12, 7-6-1, 7-6-2 Mike Masanovich Construction, Contractor 1-12 Osborne Labs., Inc., Testing 7-6~1, 7-6-2, 1-12 Ernest E. Pestana, Inc., Contractor 7-6-2 Sully Miller Contracting Co., Contractor 7-6-1 -C- $ .. - AMOUNT 178.50 325.00 $· 503.50 809.89 15.00 49.49 $ 1,377.88 $ 1,826.75 93,753_00 .2,700.00 189,384.30 225,973.·67 $513,637.72 vvu~iJ...:.. .....,;.r~11..:.J..~•J..-=-~1 ~1 l. ..... •_,..JJ..!.\.J...V.:.a..;. v~· V•\~~~1\Ji-t ;..,.,vt..'J.'tJ.J. P. o. BOX 8127 -1021~1~ Ellis .?. venue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C .O. NO. 1 ----~~~--~~- CONTRACTOR: F. T. Ziebarth Comoany, Inc. DATE: November 10 ~ 19'71 Odor Control and Improved Influent Screening Facilities JOB: at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-3-1 Amount of this change order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ none \_,J In accordance with contract provisions, the following ... change~ in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. · .· The attached F~deral Minimum Wage Rates No. ~~-2,527, · .. ·. dated Se.ptember 3, 1971 and expiring January 2,_ 1972, are hereby incorporated in the specifications for this. job. · · _noara· authorization date: ~ November 10, 1971 J.OHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS. . . • ... · Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD) .(DEDUCT) Amended Contract Price Approved: $108,400.00 $ __ n_o_n_e __ _ ~ none 'P _ _,,,__ __ $108,400.00 " COUN'rY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orang~ County, California By /s/ Pa.ul G. Brown Chief Engineer F. T. ZIEB1'LT\'J.1H COMPANY, INC. By~--~-------~~~--------:-----By --------------- A~enda Item #S(a) -n-· ·All Distrtcts cc· u ~·, 1.l' i-.:~ .. ··L, J.J·1, -r J_'.) i. _i: J. ~; r .. ~1 c-.r ~:~ • .. ) :,· v !~;1 i, v .. ~ L~[; ·..1 .;r r P. o. BOX 312 ( -lO[)~l~ !~:J li s Jwe::ue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHAIWE ORDEH C .o. NO. 1 --------- CONTHAC~rOR: General Electric Supply Company DATE: November 10, 1971 JOB: Two 1000 KVA Pad Mounted Substations for. Plant No. l,Job No. Pl-6-12: .. Amount of this change order {ADD) (DEDUCT) $_. __ -_o_-__ ~ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract 1·Jork are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Due to requirements of the Districts, delays have· occurred in the final acceptance of the equipment for w~ich.the contract time is hereby extended 90 calendar· days •. TOTAL TIME EXTENSION ••• 90 calendar days SUMr-1ARY: Original Contract.Date Original Contract Time ·original Completion Date . Time Extension Tnis Change Order Total Extension of Contract Time Revised Completion Date Actual Completion Date ·January 28, ·1971 184 calendar days July 31, 1971 90 calendar days 90. calendar days_ October 29, 1971 October 29, 1971 Original Contract Price $ 61,472.25 Board authorization date: '-'kovember 10, 1971 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS Prev. Auth. Changes $ -o- This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ -o- Amended Contract Price $ 61,472.25 Approved: COUNTY S.l\NIT.4rrroN DISTRICTS of Orange County, Cal~fornia By /s/ Paul G. Bro~·:n · Chief Engineer GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMP.ANY By~--~~--~~~~--~~-~~~--By~----~--------~~~~~ n a 011d a J~o",1 RQ.(b) 1 ~·-=>c.: _ _,~,. 1rc._ ._ -E-·All Di. s trt c ts B. H, MILLER CONSTRUCTION CO. 7 · -2 Du Pont Drive i'-"'1port Beach California 92664 Tel. (714) 833-8330 October 18, 1971 Orange County Sanitation District #1 10844 El 1 is A venue Fountain Valley, California Attention: Mr. Doug Preble Gentlemen: Re: Administration and Vehicle Buildings ·The following is a list of subcontractors who have requested to be with- drawn as the listed subcontractors on the above mentioned job, together with the names of the subcontractors who have rep laced them. Withdrawn Replaced By Demand Dry Wall Ken Burton & Sons Eckman Steel Wallco . C9mpton Glass Gleason's Glass A. E. C. Electric Hi Lite Electric Building Administration Administration Vehicle · Administration Vehicle Administration Attached please find copies of letters of withdrawal received from ·the subcontractors. Your approva 1 of these che.nges is respectfully requested at your earliest convenience! Yours truly, B. H. MILLER CON,STf uc1,10N co. ~JJ_x_ ·--71-ctL-Ki-l~ Clyde ·Mi tche 11 General Superintendent CM:l Enc. Copy to Est. ~ Supt. Agenda Item #8(d) F-1 All Districts O:::tober S, 1 'Hl .. B •. rt MI1,~,E'R C0!.1PANY 2152 DUPOUT DRIVE . -... ... -------------------· ------------------------- ':Demand 9)rywa.ll, 'Stuc. 2293 SO. GflA?lD AVE. SA?ITA AUA, CALIF. 92705 PH: (714} 557-6537 NEW20RT BEAC~, CALIFOR~IA A'rTN: JO'E ?EL{RO·'l Suh: W i thdrmll Dear Sir, ~{E: Engine21:ing and M.-:ii:1tena·1ce. Building Orange County Sanitation District w~ request to be withclrawi.1 as t'rn list~d s·:1b-cont·r.3ctot" on the abo\1~ st·-tted projc:t. Sincer.ely, DEMAND m~.YWA T.,T., , TNC . . /"' ... , , -~~ •l.. .. ' ... ._ ... ·.··.·.~ ~ '(.· , ~ /, ... , .. ·~"-11 M Rf>SEHYRE Mana:p;_· -=n1a :·1b Agenda Item #8(d) F-2 All Districts -·-=---------·--·-··· ·····----- LICENSED BONDED IN SUP.ED « ELECTRIC AL CONTRACTO R S 6900 Oran Cird o •Bu ono Pa r k, Calif.• 90620 ' \ B.H. Miller Co . 215 2 Dupont Dr . Newport Beac h, Ca l.if . Att ention : Jo e Perrone Dea r Sir : (714) 522-6224 Septembe r JO, 1 9 71 Re : Adm ini stratio n & Engineering Building Oran ge County Sanitatio n District -Fountain Valley J ob #J-7-2 · Du e to a mist a ke in th e s u b -contr act l i s t i ng o n the a bove job, and in th e int e rest of f a ir bidd in g practices , we re spe ct f ull y r equest tha t our nam e be \·Ji thdr a\vtl from th e list ing Otl/,thi s job. Ver y q:ufy' Y9-tfr-s , , .--~ ----/ / I I ',, / { •. _ -·2,.1,-·--- LeCT Gorlin ,/Pr eside nt 'I LG/r k F-3 All Distri.cts ·--···-...:...-· .. ------·-· -· -·---------" ·-------·---·--·-'. f .. \. B. H. MILLER CONSTRUCTION CO. 2152 DuPont Drive Newport Beach, California 92664 RE: WITHDRAWAL REQUEST ·Gentlemen: ,· 2501 NORTH SANTA FE AVENUE COMPTON, CALIFORNIA 90222 P.O. BOX 5505 COMPTON,· CALIFORNIA 90224 639-6440 636-0849 October 13, 1971 It is our request that your firm withdraw· our name from the list on the below referenced projects: A. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITIES '..J Orange Coun~y Sanitation District William P. Ficker, A.I.A. Newport Eaach, California B. ADMINISTRATION-ENGINEERING BUILDING ADDITION Orange County' Sanitation District William P. Ficker, A.I.A. Newport Beach, California WRS:pn cc: file ALUMINUM STORE FRONTS AND DOORS • TABLE TOPS e GLAZING 0 Agenda Item #8(d) Very truly yours, Whliam R. Smith President SLIDING GLASS DOORS GLASS • MIRRORS 0 F-4 ALUMINUM AND STEEL SASH LOUVRE WINDOWS All Districts ----------------- ·~"l!!Ult!.h STEEL, INC. 14420 CARMENITA ROAO NORWALK, CALIF'ORNIA 90650 ";I (2 1 3) 9 2 1-2 6 7 7 .. -.. . . ..... .... ~ September 24, 1971 BoHoMiller Constro Coo 2152 Du Pont Drive Newport Beach, California Attn: Mro ·Joe Perron n -. . ~ ... . . '· ,.·.· . . . - .. ; ,..,~ I , . t '. ,., \' '.°"~-P. • •v/ '• Subject: Administration Building, Fountain Valley, California Vehicle Storage & ~hintenance Building, Fountain Valley, Californiao Gentlemen: We wish to be released as the li~ted Subcontractor for the Structural Steel & Miscellaneous iron work on subject job. Very truly yours, ECKMAN STEEL, INCORPORATED . I ; I . ,:!. •. 1· ; { • r ,.. ' . ~. ·:--. I \\ v ~ i , \ : ; (_-· "'i • . ' . . ,. ..... \. . -.·( . I '• lt[J"' I , W .c. MUHLHAUSER Vice President WCM/nfpo- Agenda Item #S(d) . •., . ~,. F-5 All Distrj_cts BID T A B U L A T I 0 N ---------- Date: NovE::mber 1, 1971 . Contract For: • 1. 2_. 3. l" '.,.) ONE (1) ONE-TON CLOSED VAN TYPE TRUCK SPECIFICATION NO. A-054-R BIDDER Anaheim Dodge 1120 s. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim, California Fletcher Jones Chevrolet 6633 Westminster Avenue Westminster, California International Harvester 1110 E. Katella Avenue Anaheim, California Santa Ana Dodge, Inc. 1401 North Tustin Avenue Sant~ Ana, California Co. BID AMOUNT $3,543.10 3,593.64 3,639.97 3,655.95 * * *" * * * * * * * * * .PLUS 5% SALES TAX .$177.16 1_79.68 182.00 182.80 TOTAL BID $3,720.26 3,773.32 3,821.97 3,838.75 It is recommended that award be made to Anaheim Dodge, 1120 S. Anaheim Boulevard,. Anaheim, California, the lowest and best bidder. J. Wayne Sylvester Director of Finance Agenda Item #10 -G-All Districts B I D T A B. U L A T I 0 N ---------- .Date: November 1, 1971· Contract For: I ONE (1.) 4-WHEEL DRIVE 11 JEEP UNIVERSAL 11 ·SPECIFICATION NO. A-057 BIDDER BID AMOUNT LESS TRADE-IN PLUS 5% SALES TAX 1. Brian Chuchua's 4-Wheel Drive Center $800.00 $159.45 1625 S. Harbor Blvd. Fullerton, California * * * * * * * * * * * Specifications were sent to the following firms: Brian Chuchua's, 1625 S. Harbor, Fullerton Shay's Auto Sales, 13106 E. Whittier Blvd., Whittier Burgins Jeep, 4001 Cherry, Long Beach Milne Bros. Jeep Center, 1951 E. Colorado, Pasadena Dean Lewis Imports, 1966 Harbor Blvd., Costa Mesa Go M. Woods, 1710 S. Anaheim, Blvd., Anaheim Copeland Motors, 800 E. First Street, Santa Ana. TOTAL BID The bid received from B~ian Chuchua's 4-Wheel Drive Center, 1625 South Harbor, Fullerton, California, has been reviewed by myself and the Maintenance Superintendent and compares favorably with past bids for the same type of equipment. I, therefore, recommend that the purchase of this vehicle be made from Brian Chuchua. Agenda Item #10 J. Wayne Sylvester Director of Finance -H-All Districts B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N -Date: November 1, 1971· Contract For: • ONE (1) 16,ooo LB. GVW TRUCK WITH ARTICULA'BED HYDRAULIC CRANE -SPECIFICATION NOo A-058 . 1. 2. 3. 5. BIDDER Fletcher Jories Chevrolet 6633 Westminster Avenue Westminster, California Stanco Mfg. & Sales, Inc. Boo Spruce Lake Drive Harbor City, California Carmenita Ford Truck Sales 13443 Freewai Drive La Mirada,· California International Harvester Co. 1110 E. Katella Ave. Anaheim, California McCoy Ford 1600 W. Lincoln Anaheim, California 6. A. B.. Chance Company Pitman Mft. Co. Division 14841 Don Julian .Road Industry, California 7. Anaheim Dodge 1120 s. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim, California BID AMouwr $10,335.91 10,052.00 10,299.51 10,337.57 .. LESS TRADE-IN $790.00 500.00. ·500. 00 275.00 ·No Bid * * * * * * * * * * PLUS 57~ SALES TAX $477.29 487.60 514.98 520.10 516.88 TO'rAL BID $10,023.20 10,039.60 10,314.49 10,647.10 10,854.45 No Bid No Bid It is recommended that award be made to Fletcher Jones Chevrolet; 6633 Westminster Avenue, Westminster, California, the lowest and best bidder. A0.:enda Item #10 -I- J. Wayqe Sylvester Director of Finance All Districts BID T A B U L A T I 0 N ·Date: November 1, 1971 Contract For: fJ 1 .• 2. 3. L• \._,) .5. FOUR (4) 1/2-TON PICKUP TRUCKS SPECIFICATION NO. A--02-2_ · BIDDER Fletcher Jones Chevrolet 6633 Westminster Avenue W:estminster, California Anaheim Dodge 1120 s. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim, California International Harvester 1110 E. Katella Avenue Anaheim, California Santa Ana Dodge, Inc. 1401 N. Tustin Avenue· Santa Ana, California McCoy Ford 1600 W. Lincoln Anaheim, California Co. BID AMOlJ1~T $10,739.65 10,670.30 10,735.00 10,767.50 11,462.90 LESS TRADE-INS $1,470.00 800.00 • 660. 00 600.00 760.00 * * * * * * * * * * * .PLUS 5% SALES TAX . $536. 98 533.52 536.75 538.38 573.1:6 TOTAL BID $ .9,806.63 l0,403.82 10,611.75 10,705.88' . 11, 276. 06 It is recommended that award be made to Fletcher Jones Chevrolet, 6633 Westminster Avenue, Westminster, California, the lowest and best bidder • J. Wayne Sylvester Director of Finance . . Agenda Item #10 -J~ All Districts B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N ---------- Date: November 1, 1971 Contract For: 1. 2. TWO (2) 4-DOOR.PASSENGER SEDANS .SPECIFICATION NO. A-060 BIDDER BID AMOill\fT LESS TRADE-INS Fletcher Jones Chevrolet $6,011.10. $1,385.00 6633 Westminster Ave. Westminster, California McCoy Ford 1600 W. Lincoln 5, 953.·46 500.00 Anaheim, California * * * * * * * * * * * * PLUS 5~b SALES TAX $300.56 297. 68" TOTAL BID $4,926.66 5,751.14 It is recommended that award be made to Fletcher Jones Chevrolet, 6633 Westminster Avenue, Westmin~ter, California, the lowest and best bidder, Agenda Item #10· -K- J. Wayne Sylvester Director of Finance All Districts B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N ----------- Date: Nov.ember 1, 1971 Cont:t:·act For: Cl ONE (1) INDUSTRIAL TYPE TRACTOR WITH LOADER AND BACKHOE -SPECIFICATION NO. A-061 BIDDER BID AMOUNT PLUS 5% SALES TAX TOTAL BID l·. Harron, Ricl\:ard & McCone Co. 13770 E. Firestone Blvd. Norwalk, California $13,130~00 $656.50 2. ~ ...J. 5. ·International Haryester Co. 620 E. Katella Avenue Anaheim, California McCoy Ford Tractor 401 N. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim, California Milo Equipment Corp. 1830 E. Warner Avenue Santa Ana, California T & H Equipment Co., Inc. 2506 S. Harbor Blvd. Santa Ana, California ~3,138.oo 13;402.00 10,800.00 * * * * * * * * * * * . . . 656. 90 13,794.90 670.10· 14,072.10 5~0.00 ll,~40.00* No Bid * The bids for the above equipment have been evaluated and it has been determined that the bid of Milo Equipment Corporation does not comply with the specifications for said equipment (see attached evaluation by Maintenance Superintendent). It is, therefore, recommended that the bid of Milo Equipment Corporation in the amount of $11,340.00 be rejected and award· be made to Harron, Rickard & McCone Company, 13770 E. Firestone Boulevard, Norwalk, California, in the amount of $13,786.50, as the iowest and best bidder meeting the specification. ·Agenda Item #10 L-1 J. Wayne Sylvester Director of Finance I' All Districts f '-../ November 4, 1971 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540·2910 . (714) 962·241 I MEMORANDUM TO: J. Wayne Sylvester, ~irector of Finance SUBJECT: Recommendation for award of One .(1) Industrial Type Wheel Tractor vri th Loader and Backhoe - Specification No. A-061 I have evaluated the bids for subject equipment which were opened on November 1, 1971, and have determined that the apparent low bidder, Milo Equipment Compariy, has bid a unit that does not meet ·the specifications, as follows: Eguipment Unit Specification Bid Model JD~3iO JD-300 H.P. 52 H.P. 43 H.P. Lift 3800 lbs. 2650 lbs. Breakout Force 6200 lbs. 4000 lbs. Digging Depth 16 1 4" .13'3.5" Hydraulic Cylinders 3 inches 2.5 inches The second low bid was submitted by·Harron, Rickard & McCone Company, which bid equipment which meets the allowable parameters of the specifications. It is, therefore, recommended that the bid of Milo Equipment Company in the amount of $11,340.00 be rejected and award be made to Harron~ Ricka~d & McCone Company in the amount of $13,786.50, as the lowest and best bid meeting the specifications. WNC:rb q)~2-1t1a~ William N.·Clarke Maintenance Superintendent ~ Agenda Item #10 L-2 All Districts • RESOLUTION NOo 71-138-5 'INCREASING CONNECTION CHARGES ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NOo 506, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1972 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOo 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, INCREASING CONNECTION CHARGES ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANC~ NOo 506, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1972 * ~ * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 506 of the District provides that specified increases in sewer connection charges shall become effective on January 1, 1971, and on each succeeding January 1, provided the Directors of the District, by resolution, duly so resolve and direct. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 does hereby resolve and direct as follows: Section 1. Effective January 1, 1972, the connection charge for new construction, single dwelling units, as defined by Ordinance Noo 506, shall be $1550 Section 2o Effective January 1, 1972, the connection charge. for new construction, multiple dwelling units, as defined by Ordinance No. 506, shall be $155 for each dwelling unit or $7e75 for each plumbing fixture unit contained within such construction, whichever sum is less. Section 3. Effective January 1, 1972, the connection charge for new construction, other than dwelling units, as defined by Ordinance Noo 506, shall be $7.75 for each plumbing fixture unit and a minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $77-50. Section 4. Effective January 1, 1972~ the connection charge for replacement buildings, as defined by Ordinance Noo 506, shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in Sections 1, 2 and 3 hereinabove and the credit to be allowed against such connection charges shall be calculated at $155 per dwelling unit replaced or $7075 per plumbing fixture unit replaced, whichever sum is moreo ·Agenda Item #27 M-1 District 5 • Section 5. Effective January 1, l972,· the eonnection charges for additions to or alterations of existing buildings, as defined by Ordinance No. 506, shall be $7.75 for each plumbing fixture unit added and the credit for elimination of ·existing fixture units shall be calculated at $7075 per fixture unit. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 10, 1971 • , .... JlSol ll 7:1 300 E. CYPRESS, BREA, CALIFORNIA 92621 ::-::>Lb:=.::.:·==~.,.-==~~ (714) 529-4901 (BREA) TWX 910-596-1213 • • (213) 625-5791 (L.A.) TELEX 67919 October 15, 1971 Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District No. 2 P. o. Box 8127 1084l~ Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Cali.fornia 92708 Gentlemen: This letter i·s in reference to "delinquent charges of $2,057. 95" assessed on Kirkhill Rubber Company by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County • . We wish to request relief from these charges because we feel this penalty is intended for entities which deliberately drag their feet, will not cooperate, or are unsympathetic to the spirit and inte~t of the progr.am involved • . Kirkhill Rubber Company is none of these. For some time we have recycled some waste water in our plant as a voluntary effort to conserve water. In the photo, you will note several·long established cooling towers in addition to the recently installed tower in.the foreground. The very day that Mr. Webber explained (very considerately) your program to us, we decided to recycle almost all industrial waste water in our plant. However, to do this, we would have to enlarge our recirculating system. ·As evidence of our interest in the program, and our intent, on the day Mr. Webber was here we ordered (by tel~phone) the equipment we would need. We were assured the equipment would be delivered to us on or before July 19, in time for us to erect it before any deadlines. But, due to the railroad strike, and damage to the equipment in transit, we did not receive it until August 25. To repair .it,and install it, took us through the month of September. However, we were so intent on getting the equipment operating quickly and properly, that apparently our. paperwork was not given the attention it should have had - -and we passed the deadline without requesting a few days of grace in writing. The recirculating equipment has been working effectively through the month of October in a manner we believe should be of complete satisfaction to the County Agenda Item #37 N-1 District 2· " KIRl<HILL RUBBER COMPANY Brea, California Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District No. 2 . Page 2 October 15, 1971 and the local community. We are not discharging excess capacity water into the sewer. $2,057 .95 is a very severe penalty to a company which did everything huri1anly possible to comply with the intent and spirit of the or.dinances relating to industrial waste water. We request relief from it. Very truly yours, ~ R. G.· COLVIN / T r e a s u r e r RGC:gkw ~ enclosure -photo ... Agenda Item #37 N-2 District 2 EXCERP TS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REG ULAR JOINT MEE TI NG OF THE i30P.TIDS OF DIP.ECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DIST~ICTS NOS . l, 2 , 3, 5 , 6, 7 and 11, OF 0RhNGS COUNTY, CALIFORNI A A reg ul ar joint meeting o f t h e Boards of Di r e ctor s of County Sa n itati o n Dis t ricts Nos . 1 , 2 , 3 , 5, 6 , 7 , a n ~ 11, of Or ange County , California , was he l d at the hour of 7:30 p .m., No vember 1 0 , 19 71 , 1 0844 Ellis Avenue , Fountai n Valle y, Ca lifor n ia . The Chairman of t h e Joi n t A1 m in~s trati v e Org anization ca lled the weeting to order at 7:30 p .~. Th e r o ll was called o n 0 the Sec r etary repor t e1 a quor um present for each District 's Boa r a . DISTRICT 7 Ad j o urnme nt * * * * * * * * * Mo v e d, seco nd ed and duly carri e d: That this mee ting o f the Bo ard o f Directo r s of Co unty Sanitati o n District No . 7 b e adj ourne d t o Nov e mb e r 23, 1 9 71 at 5:00 p .m. The Chairman the n declared the mee ting so adjourne d at 9 :47 p.m., No v em b e r l J , 1 971. STATE OF CA LIFORNIAl SS, COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J . WAYNE SY LVESTER , Se c r etary of each of the Boaras of Directors of Co un ty Sanitation Dist r i ~ts Nos. 1 , 2, 3 , 5 , 6, 7 , a n d 11 , of Or a n ge Cou n ty , California , •1 0 here b y certify that t he a b '..)ve an d foregoing to b e f u l l, tru e an0 correct copy of minute entries on meeting of sai0 Boar d s of Directors on t he 1 0 th da y of Nov e mbe r 19 71 ' IN WITNESS WH ERE OF, I h a v e h ere un to set my h a n n t hi s ~a y of Nove mb e r, 1 9 71 1 0 th S-107 1, 2' t h e B ar~s of Directors nitation Districts Nos . 6, 7 , and 1 1 Agenda Item No. I & .. November 5, 197 1 MEMORANDUM TO: EDWARD JUST, JOINT CHAIRMAN FROM : ROBERT FINNEL L, CHAIRMAN, SPECIAL COMMITTEE STUDYING DIRECT ORS ' FEES SCHEDULE SUBJE CT : RECOMMENDATION FOR CHANGES IN THE PRESENT DIRECTORS ' FEES SCHEDULE The followin g r epo rt constitutes the recommendations of the special committee appointed by the Joint Boards at the regular board meet ing of March 10, 1971 . Dur i ng this period the committee has met on a number of occasions and has requested and received detailed information from both the Sanitation Districts ' staff and the Di stricts ' Ge n e ral Counsel . The committee has reviewed several alternatives which are discussed be l ow. (1) Ma intain the Directors ' compensation at the present level as established by resolution of the individual Districts in 1967 and 1968 . The s pecial committee conc lude d that the present fee s tructure is inequitable and that another alternative should be sought . (2) Amend the fee schedule so that those Directors repres enting more than one District at a joint meeting wou l d only receive compensation equal to t hat of a Director representing a single District . The General Counse l ruled that under the present Heal t h and Safety Code the Sanitation District does not have the authority to disc riminate in its f ees . Thi s alternative c ould be achieved, however , by requesting the State Legislature to enact special l egislation . It was the consensus of the special committee that because such legis - lation would affect all sanitation districts in the State of California, the chances of securing passage of such l e gislation were slim . It was also agreed that even if such legislation could be enacted it would be time consuming and would not solve oth er p r obl ems whi c~ wi ll be facing the Districts in the near future . The spec i al conuni ttee does r ecom .. rnend, however , that if the Joi nt Boa rds do not a g r ee with the c ommitt ee's reconun ended alternat i ve, serious consideration should be g iven to r equesting l egislative action to accomplish the reduction of multiple fees to a single Director . (3) Consolidate the various Sanitation Districts int o one County Sanitation District with opera - tions, maintenance, and capital outlay costs split evenly throughout the new District . (4) While this wou l d achieve many of the goa ls the conunitt ee fe lt were needed, it would create tax increase s in Dist ricts 5, 6 , and 7 , whi l e l owering taxes in Districts 1, 3 , and 11. It would have no effect on Di strict 2 . The Com - mitte e concluded that this would not be an equitable distribution of costs and therefore does not reconunend this alternative . Consolidate the presen t Sanitation District s into one County Sanitation District with sp ecial zones whi.ch wou ld b e co -terminus wi th existing Districts ' boundaries and it would have separate budgets, could issue bonds, and incur bonded indebtedness for improvemen-cs and the maint e nance thereof within the special zone . In effect, this alternative would provide for only one Sanitation Dis tri ct but would allow fo r special zones which would be the equival ent of the present County Sanitation Districts which would have no effec t on t he tax rates of each of the present Dist ricts . The conso l idated agenci es would act as a single Sanitation District n ow acts . The existing Joint Administrative Organi zation would be eliminated as would the nec essity for seven sets of resolutions, minutes, seals, e tc ., for joint business . Rather than having Di st rict No . 1 act as agent for all the Districts it would merely be one District . There would be no duplication of Directors in that each city within the Distri ct, each Sanitary District now r epresented , and the County Board of Super - visors, would have a singl e representative and an a l ternate for a total of 23 active Directors . The conunittee felt that this l atter point was one which deserved special attention of the Joint Boards . At the present time there a r e -2 - ·. 29 Directors representing 19 ·cities and 3 Sanitary Districts and the County Board of Sup e rvis ors . However, if Districts No . 5 and No . 11 annex presently unincorporated areas, the entire city councils of the Cities of Newport Beach and Huntington Beach will automatically become the Board of Directors for those two Sanitation Districts. This will increase the number of Directors to 36 with two cities having 14 representa - tives voting on matters before the Joint Boards. In addition, if each of the mayors of cities belonging to more than one District should elect a different alternate to repre - sent them i n each Di strict, the number of Directors could go as high as 48 . This would more than double the number of Directors which would be possible under this proposed alter- native . The committee felt that the unwieldy. nature of such a large Boa rd would be detri - mental to the effic i ent operations of the Di stricts . This alternative would also have the effect of substantially re<'lucing the number of special districts, an objective formal l y endorsed by t he Orange County Board of Supervis ors, the Orange County Division of the Lea"gue of Ca lifo rni a Ci ties, and the Orange County Grand Jury . At the same time, it would still provide the mechanism fo r solving local problems by providing for zone committ ees equivalent to the present Districts' Boards . Last but certainly not least, the reduction in Directors fees would amount to a sub - stantial savings to the taxpayers of the Districts. The committee recommends the adoption of this alternate plan . It has prepared for the re - view of each Director, a proposed consolidation agreement . It i s recommended ·that this item -3 - be placed on the December 8, 1 971 agenda for a discussion and vote by the membership of the Joint Boa rds . Respe ctfully submitt ed, R~~(f.l ft~ Chairman· Member s of the Special Comm ittee : Ch airman: Membe rs: Ex officio Membe r s : Ro be rt Finnell, Mayo r City of Pl acentia J oseph Hyde, Councilman City of Los Al amitos Linds l ey Parsons , Counci l man City of Newport Beach Don Smith, Mayo r City of Orange Mark Stephenson, Councilman City of Anaheim C. Arthur Nisson , Gene r a l Counsel Orange County Sanitation Districts Edward Just, Joint Chairman .Orange County Sanitation Districts -4 - AGREEMENT FOR CONSOLIDATION DRAFT 9/29/71 This Agreement made in Fountain Valley, California, on ______ day of ~~~~--~--' 19 ___ , by and between COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOSo 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY (each hereinafter referred to collectively as "Districts"). W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Districts are organized and existing under the provisions of· the County Sanitation District Act . . . {Section 4700, et seq. of the Health & Safety Code), and WHEREAS, Districts are each engaged in.the collection, transporting and disposal of sewage and industrial wastes originating with the County of Orange, and WHEREAS, Districts jointly own and operate property used for the treatment and disposal of sewage and industrial wastes, and WHEREAS, each District serves a different territory of the County of Orange and owns certain sewerage facilities independent of each other District, ano WHEREAS, the territory of all districts together constitute a contiguous territor1, and WHEREAS, by agreement districts maintain a single joint administrative organization which administers all of the affairs of each districts, and WHEREAS, by reason of' assess·ed valuations, varying states of development and land uses, each district has diff'erent requirements for f'unding its operations, and WHEREAS, many administrative benef'its can be derived f'rom a consolidation of' all districts into a single county sanitation district, and WHEREAS, the County Sanitation District Act provides for the maintenance of zones within a single county sanitation district {Health & Safety Cod~, Section 4850-4856, inclusive) which can be maintained to keep existing tax burdens in similar proportions upon consolidatiqn of the districts. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the agreements set forth hereinafter, it is agreed as follows: 1. That the districts will petition for consolidation into one county sanitation district whose territory will include all of the territory now contained within their respec- tive territorial boundaries. 2. The consolidation district, hereinafter called , will be known as -------~---------~---- 3. When formed, will be divided into zones as authorized under the provisions of Health & Safety Code, Section 4850-4856, inclusive. Said zones will be coterminous with existing boundaries of each district and sub-committees of the directors will be created to recommend to the whole board of directors the special improvements and tax requirements for each zone. Each sub-committee shall include the directors whose constituencies are significantly included within the zone they are to be concerned with. 4. In determining the revenues needed for each zone within as. provided in Health & ~afety Code, Sedt~on 4856, the directors shall calculate the requirem~rits for each.zone insofar as· the operation of -----is dis- tinguished from the special sewerage facilities constructed, maintained and operated to serve the.localized requirements of the zones in accordance with the joint owne~ship, operation · and construction agreement dated March 10, 1971, now existing by and between the districts, parties to this agreement. 5. · 'rhe expressed intent of this agreement is to provide the means to maintain the existing proportions of the tax burden on the property within each distri9t to be. included in the newly consolidated ------ ' November 10, 1971 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County P. o. Box 8127 10844 Elf is Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: Agenda Item No --~~ .e H. LAWSON MEAD Attorney at Law 2014 North Broadway Santa Ana, California 92706 Enclosed herewith is a map showing certain properties which have been shaded and are located between what was the old Chapman Avenue and what is the realigned Chapman Avenue. These properties consist of approximately nine (9) acres and desire to annex to County Sanitation District No. 7. At this time, the County Sanitation District boundaries approximate the old Chapman Avenue. All of this property, except for a few hundred square feet which is located under either the old or the new Chapman Avenue, belongs to the Charles c. Jones, Tr. et al. The owners do·not reside within said territory nor are there any registered voters within said territory. Said property consists of the following Assessor Parcels: Assessor Parcel No. 093-150-37 093-150-48 093-150-49 093-150-51 093-150-52 093-150-53 093-150-54 093-150-58 093-150-59 Assessed Value $ 80.00 1,100.00 260.00 -0- 10, 400. 00 200.00 ·1,000.00 -0- 70. 00 ' County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County -2-11/10/71 I respectfully request that these properties be annexed to County Sanitation District No. 7. HLM m enc very tr~ly yours, w · ~ ~1-uW~ \\~ H. Lawson Mead ~~©~ll~~~ (·WV 1 01971 COUNTY SMHTATION DISTRICIB OE .ORANGE COUNTY,, CALIF;. .\ .... ( 92-36 MARCH 195/ MARCH 1571 D/'>D ,...,..,.. ....... - ( POR. S£C. 25, 26, 35 e 36, r 4 s., R. 9 w. .so ,,e. ® RS 12~ .!I AC. ® 4/1"6 AC. ® G-1.GUAC. 104-01 SHOWN IN CIRCLES M.M. 6-32 ( @ 91 . .J7'AC • la I ,,, ~ ASSE"SSOR'S MAP BOOK 93 PAGE" 15 COUNTY Or ORANGE ... .;, , .. ,, 600'. 3/tl 11 '...____.,,,,. I Agenda Item No. 11 November 10, 1971 .Effect on Districts' Tax Rates of Proposed State Policy for Discharge to Open Waters COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 . (~14) 9~2-2411 The following notes are relative to the attached data: Cost for construction, maintenance and operation of advanced treatment facilities are reflected. Schedule I assumes 100% financing by the Districts. Schedule II assumes 80% grant financing a.nd 20% financing by the Districts. Does not include capital or operating costs for advanced sludge handling procedures which may be required. Projections for District 2 do not consider possible tax increase in the event up-stream participation in Santa Ana River does not materialize. Projections for District 3 do not consider possible tax increase for financing Master Plan collection system facilities. This matter is presently under study. \--1 ~ District 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 PROJECTED DISTRICT TAX RATES TO FINANCE ADVANCED' 'TREATI·:ETJT FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION Assume 100% Financing by Districts · -Schedule I Nov. 10, 1971 ·'. 1971-72 Actual Tax Rate 1972-73 1973-74 1974-75 1975-76 1976-77 Projected Projected Projected P~ojected Projected Tax Ra.te Tax Ra.te ~ax Rate Ta.x Rate Tax Ra.te $ .39 $ .84 $ 1.11 $.1.38 $ 1.01 $ .62 .43 .78 .98 1.16 .. 88 ·. 58 .47 .80 .99 1.16 .89 .62 . 26 .. 55 .71 .85 .62 .38 .23 .57 .54 .94 .66 .38 .50 .75 .89 1.01 .80 .60 .39 .71 .87 l·.01 .77 .52 Total or Average $ .42 $ . 94· $ 1.12 $ .85 $ .57 1.1s 1.10 1.os 1.00 .95 .90 • .a; .. > • c .Bo 0 0 ; .7;. a: w 0.. .• 70 w t-.6S < a: )( .60 c t- .SS. so .4S .40 1! 12 1.l 73 AVERAGE TAX RATE ll 74 ll 75 F'ISOAL YEAR 19. 77 Schedule II PROJECTED DISTRICT TAX RATES TO FINANCE Nov. 10_, 1971 ADVANCED TREAT1v1ENT FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION \.,,_! Assume 80% Grant Financing & 20% Financing by Districts 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 1974-75 1975-76 1976-77 Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected 1 District Ta.x Rate Tax Rate Ta.x Rate Ta.x Rate Ta.x Rate Tax Rate 1 1 $ .39 $ .84 $ .85 $ .75 $ .46 $ .51 2 . 43 .78 .78 .69 .47 .50 3 .47 .80 .80 .72 .52 .55 5 .26 .55 .55 .47 .. 29 .31 6 . 23 .57 .57 .49 . 27 .31 7 . 50 .75 .75 .68 .52 .55 11 .39 .71 .70 .62 . . 43 . 46 Total or Average $ .42 $ .76 $ .76 $ .67 $ . 46 $ . 49 \.,_I 1.00 .9s .90 .as • > .Bo 0 < 0 .1s 0 ~ * cc .70 LIJ 0. LIJ .6S t-< a: .60 )( AVERAGE TAX RATE < t-SS .so .4S .40 "ll ll . ll ll ff 1§. ~ 72 73 74. 75 7'1 F'ISCAL YEAR November 10, 1971 Excerpt from Proposed Sta.te Policy for Discharge to Open Waters D. MINIMUM LEVELS OF EFFLUENT QUALITY .• ~ The minimum levels of effluent quality specified herein are applicable to discharges meeting the requirements of sections C-1 and C-2. 1. Physica.l Characteristics a. Settleable solids concentration shall not exceed 0.1 ml/l more tha.n 50 percent of the time nor 0.2 ml/l more than 10 percent of the time. b. Suspended solids concentration shall not exceed 30 mg/l more than 50 percent of the time nor 40 mg/l more than 10 percent of the time. c. Turbidity shall not exceed 30 TU more than 50 percent of the time nor 50.TU more than 10 percent of the time. d. Floatable solids shall not be present in the effluent. 2. Chemical Characteristics a. pH shall be within the limits of 6.o to 9.0 at all times. b. Grease concentration shall not exceed 10 mg/l more than 50 percent of the time·nor 15 mg/l more than 10 percent of the time • . 3. Toxicity Characteristics a. The toxicity of undiluted, unchlorinated effluent shall · permit not less than 50 percent survival of test animals ·after 96-hour exposure 50 percent of the time, and not less than 30 percent survival of test animals after 96-hour exposure 10 percent of the time. b. The following concentrations shall not be exceeded: ·concentration in mg/J. Arsenic Cadmium Chromi \un (total) Copper Lead Mercury Zinc Cyanide Phenolic Compounds ··Total Chlorinated Hydrocarbons Ammonia (N) 500/o of time 10% of tiI~e 0.5 0 .. 01 o.s 0.1 0.1 0.005 o.s 0.1 0.5 0.001 25 1.0 0.02 1.0 0.2 Oo2 0.01 1.0 0.2 1.0 0.002 40 RESOLUTION NO. 71-139 A RESOLUTION OF THE JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS, REQUESTING THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD TO POSTPONE DECISIONS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPOSED STATE POLICY FOR DISCHARGE TO OPEN OCEAN WATERS UNTIL THE CONCLUSION OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT STUDIES . .": .. WHEREAS, the State Water Resources Control Board proposes to establish general principles, water quality objectives, and dis- charge restrictions for discharges to the operi ocean which will be acceptable to the Environmental Protection Agency; and, WHEREAS, the proposed State policy contains water quality objectives, discharge restrictions and minimum level of effluent quality provisions which will require major capital and operational expenditures by municipal dischargers adjacent to the Pacific Ocean; and, WHEREAS, the Orange County citizen's tax bill will increase by 81% to 167% for service provided by the County Sanitation Districts; and, WHEREAS, there is not adequate scientific information existing to substantiate all of the discharge restrictions, and minimum effluent quality standards stated in the proposed State policy; and, WHEREAS,. in spite of the long history of marine disposal there is relatively little documented information on the influence of treated waste water on the ecology of the marine environment; and, WHEREAS, the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project is currently engaged in a $1.1 million study of man's effect on the Pacific Ocean waters of the Southern California c·oastline. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts subs9Tibe to the State Water Resources Control Board's intent to establish a comprehensive u~iform poli~y to insure the continuing beneficial uses of the coastal waters. 2. That the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts request assurances that any State-imposed discharge re- strictions or effluent standards be based in fact on some measurable improvement to the marine environment. 3. That the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts request that the State Water Resources_ Control Board postpone consideration of ~he implementation of requirements other than those that can be substantiated, such as restrictions on known toxic substances until completion of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project study in October, 1972. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 10, 1971. ~ -"\' -I v' ~ "° ....._: " ,1...., -S-E) ~ ..D ~ ~ I §\ ~ ..J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ VJ ~ ., ~' t ~ .~ ~-~ "'-~ •.. --~ ' ., ~~ -::~ ::.... . ':)"' -~ . '\ ~ •) ·f:. ~ -;J ~~ ·~ ~ .. ~ r ... ~ -~ R ·~ Q ~ 0 B: 0 ~ ~-- g ~ Q ..j '1 Ji -D 'f 0 '& ~ ...) vJ 0 ~ G r.J -f-l I (j' ..J ...j ()() t ;J" <1\ ~ 6' U\ .....() -..::> ~ "\ :::: V\ (J ~ II\ t" 0 \".J \.J v ...... -L lf1 ~ -'-r 0 (} ~) G' I:'\ "" V\ -" ,..... " -.___ S\.lL-.G(. s·qJ_) '-\. \"1.~ "111 O?,:.«A1J,J,\';.1 !Jii'l:il<Jll I I ' I f,/J lllA,(/, I Cfl!Er Of[,fA T~~ !(]) q14. 'I ·:. 't> ! Sfl/,.7 Srf,.?. S(f) 1C).7·'YI I I ' .- Pf.,/,! 'T tJ,7,f, ;! 2 s~;, n.-S I Ui!!./TrU4AI z $"1:~-t...5o : r-E -- - PJJ,Vf t).t'.f',fll !Z@ 1 06 · "t.TJ ___ ,I . --- -,A PP.:.·'! I 5.f 1_qw_. -------------. A 5 5 r. £1 V.1 P.,. !(j) C\l\O-\\ID I -L -' !'TIC/:" A?P,f ~Nl"/Cl - ~- i /,~?,('f"j'fltf' .JI I ~1<;-.,,~ I Af?R!#f!t'E .r ;(f) I 1.170 . s <:~ L48, ~ftt.~ I RJtl!. ,(JJt. /.(f) BAc.T. t'CJ.IFJl./4B t;JUAH ANA/.. l(J) lc91P -<t:<->:S -, LA/f f[{/1 Ji" 3 (J) . L6"'~T]b I ----- LAl:f r1t:1/, f f • .. ~ ' • ' • ' ''® ,, 5"7'5"--1r-{ 1..AB A!JJE Z@ S"3D-lt ·~'1 srUD!NT J!L Pf. I -z..'-/s/~~ ! 5vc6~ ST t. \> b.$1$' ''/o bib -7 bb ·~ JNS1R:JMENT;f7!JIJ I 11../.51.fllW, ;:11,N, . r0. • ~\t\-\0"1.-0 ~--- llV.SrR: 1f"CJ/, .!! IQ) 1~$-~I.\ CJ I I NSf R, TE tlli ,[ Z® v11-sl~,_ '-' --I -- APP,f ENT/t! JI Z@ . . .. . . . . . . . {nD<°b· ,$<. . .. APPJ'l'N'/lt:c £ ( 10 ·-$'~:? ·-- el.EC T, $l.IPJ 11f\", 10 9~o-tr1o ----- --·---I £LEC'f, TECH.JI 1-© 1s~-C\<+0 I 51..EC'!. it'Cll.J' IQ) tt.>11' ~t\"). I I £L EC(, .~/,~~ Jl),</ 1([) tco<t,. lSS I . UT/f./1Vt/,/,Jlv' I 5=-~0-(!J 'S'"°\ ( £1..ECT.~ICA/.. I · £J,.tCT, /:"k!M 10 ~\'\ - l 0'"2.. 0 J . ' I £ 1-Etr. 7£'/:JI. )! 'J.@ 1~~ .. '1~0 1 £1.!CTJECI/, I I b11-<l>~)... l (_ 50~ bE"S'TC '\.) ~~"le- I u.=21.,t,Lt"' t© (,',IL>· '3$~ ~~--- .I APPf£Y11.:£ !.LI . Z@ .... s~c.. -eo'b 1.o ~t -1 -c;1 , r ? (:[) L 0f_~ ?(·£.· I -_I·--! UECI/, ill.:!. /.!);/' l. (j) . 5".$'1.. • to r,,\o I .. AP?.fFN11:.,C.: .r z® . .>-S-'1>3 I t!FC/-/i,V/C-il O!f/, ;)~ ,.-------. Mf (h'AA~1CA:. .SF/,f, !(D qi l\--1nci, u:::.t1.1:\'l:,t: ,.::ti~. 10 -1--t-s _.,,.t-1 I I I · ,?f E .CJ/, .If /,/ ,f Cl/, JI 10 I (j) t.,£6-Ss'-f b~b -"'<>S lf I -- //I£ c 1(, :t' ;!. 0 /elb -If.& ----1--- ----- /.-'/£ t ;(. 11,1~'.f. !/,f.(1 ... I (j) . . . . . . . 5$"1.-1,-,'b\a I I um ;rr kWI ~ 'j) ..:;:L~ -L-~ 0 -----I j{/~JtJER I([) &'$G·'S~'+ -- - ---- . . . . . ~ . . . . . I JI.[ C/-/,4 ,\•:'t).'. ,ry~-: I 0 jl/'S-q ... -, --~ U E Cf(, .ff I \,,)b-"b"il4 I UICI!. I I 0 Mb -7l-(-, --· ~ U £Cf!. !.! TCf. 1,f,f 1/ IQ) ~'{L.--b ~\? I Su 1-& ~-:,1-E""\) 5.-$. '·> ~ ~. . I -·---.....-- Afll'A'!N1/t! JI I ss-c..-6i>b \ I I PAIN11if:. 10 (:,''.' 'S -'l) '°3 D MTCE. I Mtt/./, .r 2. ([) fc,00 -,q~ +-- urt£, i/,JllV :!@_ ~St..-<a 6b . . . MAINTENANCE. ~ C..9-//:J_[f'JJC1101V /Jtfl'f, . p;.J/11 I I PiA NT l./Ttl fJ1J, j;'/ i Mr ti, Mt th~ I 2. (]) 600--p/$ -·-+ --- M1tE, !vUV -I 5{1..·~<i.b PJ.,.r,vr l./lt,.:5;c:v :nfo.~ .. .. - PUNT Jlft'E, oP//R, I Q) ~\4 -'\ ?>'$ . ,PJ. J,{/1 /- _I_~ If.A Alf J,l1lf, P.f /J, I ([) . -\·L.S-c-10L.. I MTtE. ,fl.!1.-W, ,l" I loOO· lt.f '$' '- p /1!;£;17,~/!$ lP.iA Air L·r.J.iii. . I (j). (-z..S--qo,_ . . -·-------r·-..--l -------- --· I --. ~ ---·___.._-_-_- [ f/5AfY £11, t:Jfl. .r . • . I . 5S'l.--&'6b I I C,fN~SfP,t/~, ;pN, ' I 0 I \"2.~ -'1 o-i. ?t\\r-\$;0, b.<t,1~c/Q _,\~-ib<\ . [LJ7!1./fY,JIAAI a,fNOJKP£, .t z~ 3@ 5'-~-{c.~o . ~i..~--<o~o .....-----------~-· ---·==J "'S.Jl:,..E-<-("S\ ( i.') l\--\"1.S "i•.> , · ·c r\--i) • ·-1 -"/ ,, • :. " 0 .P.f'tJ,/[1..'T:.7 .:?P/1'. 1 0 s ""!l \.'''I"' ... r · --· ·---, i IN'O/!:'C t:i f.!(.i!,tl I I I t_ __ T __ ..J I U 1'/I •or1/ I / (I/ I . .,, '.i '@'' L.22:'· (. ~ 'l . •. t{ ?Pf(f/.11/CE APPt£!111tE I .. 10 1..\\0-":i'1;':t> l./AINTE!l/!NCE / r:'iJ1Vuli?!/CfltJ!v' /Jf//, Cv!LECT/.J N f/f C!LIT!.~f £'!///:Jl(l/I I T,f i!I( f 4fil-AN)! f 2® S~l.-L..\\o I U1!L!Tf' J,./)11 !([) $'-', (; '-...$ ~; {.J/ I CtJLL. ,CAC. 5P(~. I 0 q,1...\-I I':) 'O \ S.E /l/E f! /. I N £j Tt t111r U1tf !JI;.!, I ([) (,,~)(.,. 'SS "t tJT//.11;/ /,/,/!/ I([) 5? . ."~ . (, 'S 0 . : : : Tftl!IK ;,f~t'. IY#. I ([) b<e/-:> · 'c,~ '4 ~~ tJTI 1.l f Y Af AN 10 :'.:1 ~ -C:<.L) . .· t~/.H (, ;;1!., f'J!i.; I ([) -,4"';, -'\1..1 I ----'-- PAft $1'1 .. flE~'l/.J[ ?.(!) l&'l (p • <;. s 'f ,P/,(,P, J1A . lrlEt l/, I S ® l r-l lr -11 ... \,, PM!? SU .. llf t .l/,f / .5 ® ~ -:-1 t s. ,,., Agenda Item No. 11 November 10_, ~971 Effect on Districts• Tax Rates of Proposed State Policy for Discharge to Open.Waters COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 . . (714) 962-2411 The following notes a.re relative to the attached· da.ta: Cost for construction_, maintenance a.nd operation of advanced treatment facilities are reflected. Schedule I assumes 100% financing by the Districts. Schedule II assumes 80% grant financing and 20% financing by the Districts. Does not include capital or operating costs for advanced sludge handling procedures which may be required. Projections for District 2 do not consider possible tax increase in the event up-stream participation in Santa Ana River does not materialize. Projections for District 3 do not consider possible tax increase for financing Master Plan collection system facilities. This matter is presently under study. District 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 PROJECTED DISTRICT TAX RATES TO FINANCE ADVANCED TREATViENT F'ACIL.iTIES CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION Assume 100% Financing by Districts Schedule I Nov. 10,· 1971 1971-72 Actual Tax Rate 1972-73 1973-74 1974-75 1975-76 1976-77 Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Ta.x Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate $ .39 $ . 84 $ 1.11 $ 1.38 . $ 1.01 $ .62 . 43 .78 . 98 . 1.16 .88 .58 .47 .80 .99 1.16 .89 .62 . 26 .. 55 .71 .85 .62 .38 .23 .57 .54 .94 .66 ·. 38 .50 .75 .89 1.01 .80 .60 .39 .71 .87 1.01 .77 .52 Total or Average $ .42 $ .76 $ . 91J. $ 1.12 $ .85 $ .57 1.15 1.10 1.os 1.00 .95 .90 • .as .. > • c .Bo 0 0 .; .75. 0: 111 .70 IL 111 t-~ .65 )( ~ .60 .s5 so .4;' .40 ll 72 1.l 73 AVERAGE TAX RATE ll 74 11 75 F' I SOAL YEAR Schedule II PROJECTED DISTRICT TAX RATES TO FINANCE Nov. 10,, 1971 ADVANCED TREATMEN'r FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION '.._/ . 80% Grapt Financing & 20% Financing by Districts Asswne· 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 1974-75 1975-76 1976-77 Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected District Ta.x Rate Tax Ra.te Ta.x Rate Ta.x Ra.te Ta.x Ra.te Ta.x Rate 1 $ .39 $ .84 $ .85 $ .75 $ .46 $ .51 2 . 43 .78 .78 .69 .47 .50 3 .47 .80 .80 .72 .52 .55 5 .26 .55 .55 . 47 .. 29 .31 6 . 23 .57 .57 .49 .27 .31 7 .59 .75 .75 .68 .52 .55 11 .39 .71 .70 .62 .43 . 46 Total or Average $ .42 $ .76 $ .76 $ .67 $ .46 $ .49 1.00 .9; .90 .as • > .Bo • < 0 0 .1s ~ • a: .70 L\J a. I.a.I .6S I-< a: .60 )( AVERAGE TAX RATE < I-SS .;o .4S .40 ll ll ll 1.1 * 1.§. ~ 72 73 74. 75 77 FISCAL. YEAR November 10, 1971· Excerpt from Proposed State Policy for Discharge to Open Waters D. MINIMUM LEVELS OF EFFLUENT QUALITY The minimum levels of effluent quality specified herein are applicable to discharges meeting the reqti.irements of sections C-1 and C-2. l. Physical Characteristics a. Settleable solids concentration sha11·not exceed 0.1 ml/l more than·50 percent of the time nor 0.2 ml/l more than 10 percent of the time. b. Suspended solids concentration shall not exceed 30 mg/l more than 50 percent of the time nor 40 mg/l more than 10 percent of the time. c. Turbidity shall not exceed 30 TU more than 50 percent of the time nor 50 TU more than lO percent of the time. d. Floa.table solids shall not be present in the effluent. 2. Chemical Characteristics a. pH shall be within the limits of 6.o to 9.0 at all times. b. Grease concentration shall not exceed 10 mg/l more than 50 percent of the time nor 15 mg/l more than 10 percent of the time. 3. Toxicity Characteristics a. The toxicity of undiluted, unchlorinated effluent shall permit not less than 50 percent survival of test animals after 96-hour exposure 50 percent of the time, and not less than 30 pe.rcent survival of test animals after 96-hour exposure 10 percent of the time. b. The following concentrations shall not be exceeded: ·concentr~tion i~/J. Arsenic Cadmium Chromium (total) Copper Lead Mercury Zinc Cyanide Phenolic Compounds ·Total Chlorinated Bydrocarbonr; Ammonia (N) 500;0 of time 10% of time o.s 0.01 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.005 o.s 0.1 0.5 0.001 25 1.0 0.02 1.0 0.2 Oo2 0.01 1.0 0.2 1.0 0.002 40 -~ RESOLUTION NO. 71-139 A RESOLUTION OF THE JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS, REQUESTING THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD TO POSTPONE.DECISIONS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPOSED STATE POLICY·FOR DISCHARGE TO OPEN OCEAN WATERS UNTIL THE CONC.LUSION OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT STUDIES ... WHEREAS, the State .water Resources Control Board proposes to establish general.principles, wat~r quality objectivesi and dis- charge restrictions for discharges to the open ocean which will be acceptable to the Environmental Protection Agency; and, WHEREAS, the proposed State policy contains water quality objectives, discharge restrictions and minimum level of effluent quality provisions which will require major capital and operational expenditures by municipal qischargers adjacent to the Pacific Ocean; and, WHEREAS, the Orange County citizen's tax bill will increase by 81% to 167% for service provided by the County Sanitation Districts; and, WHEREAS, there is not adequate scientific information existing. to substantiate all of the discharge restrictions, and minimum effluent quality standards stated in the proposed State policy; and, WHEREAS, in spite of the long history of marine disposal there is relatively little documented information on the influence of treated waste water on the ecology of the marine environment; and, WHEREAS, the Southern California Coastal Wa.ter Research Project is currently engaged in a $1.1 million study of man's effect on the Pacific Ocean waters of the Southern California c·oastUne. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts subscribe to the State Water Resources Control Board's ,- intent to establish a comprehensive uniform pol~cy to insure the .. - continuing beneficial uses of the coastal waters. · 2. That the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation '._,/ Districts request assurances that any State-imposed discharge re- strictions or effluent standards be based in fact on some measurable improvement to the marine environment. 3. That the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts request that the State Water Resources Control Board postpone consideration of ~he implementation of r.equirements other than those that can be substantiated, such as restrictions on known toxic substances until completion of the Southern California Coastal.Water Research Project study in October, 1972. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 10, 1971.