Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1971-10-27
> I > I ti II BOARDS OF Dt RECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 5175 of O ran~e Cou nty, Californ ia 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92705 (1) ( 2 ) (3 ) DISTRICT Roll Ca l l Adjourned Regular Meeting October 27, 1 971 -7 :30 p.m . Appointment of Chairman pro tern, if necessary A G ENDA ADJOURNM EITTS ... /7 .- COMP & WLEAG E ... :r···-· FILES SET UP ..... -~·········· RESOLUTl~NS CERP ~ LHfERS \;rtlHH! ... v MINUlES WRITIE N .. V - MINUl ES HLED ....•...• - Report of Engineer in connection with annexation of areas in which the densities will exceed those on which the master plan report has been prepared (4) Consideratio~ of further action re petition for reconsideration of proposed annexation . See pages 11 A 11 and 11 B 11 (5) Consideration of motion to recess 1,.,......- RONALD L. TIDAY, ARNOLD G. HEWETT .AND ROBERT V. FAUST l Attorneys at Law 12866 Main Street, Suite 1 .2 Garden Grove, California· 92640 3 (714) 534-2062 4 Attorneys for Petitioner 5 6 '1 8 9 IN THE MATTER OF PETITIONS OF ) ) MARIDA YLE THOMPSON PE..71. Y / ) Executrix of the Estate of ) MARIO~ E. JONES, Deceased. ) ____ ·_) Agenda Item No. ~ -~) FILED In th!! o·:flcc of the S-:?cretary Co~'1nitotion District ·No .. " APPLICATION AND PETITION FOR A REHEARING AND RECONSIDERATION OF PETITIONS OF MARIDAYLE THOMPSON PEAY, HERETOFORE FILED ON AVGUST 13, 1971 and AUGUST. 16, 19.71, AND THE DECISION OF THIS BOARD M..l\.DE SEPT&'1BER 30, 1971. .10 TO: BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 11 i2 .13 10844 Ellis Avenue, P. O. Box 8127 'Fquntain Valley, California 92708 ATTENTION : MR • FRED HARPER 14 Petitioner, MAR-IDAYLE THOMPSON PEAY:, Executrix of the 15 Estate of MA~ION E. JONES, Deceased, hereby appeals to your 16 honorable.Board and petitions for a rehearing and reconsideration. 17 of the above matter, and requests that saia rehearing be re-· 18 scheduled at the earliest possible time convenient to your.Board, . . 19 and requests that said rehearing be granted to be set upon the 20 calendar for the meeting of October 13, 1971, or as soon thereafter . 21 as Counsel and Petitioner can be heard •. 22 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. 23 DATED: October 1, 1971. 24 25 RONALD L. TIDAY 1 ARNOLD G. HEWETT AND ROBERT V. FAUST 26 ·27 BY: __ £_R~~-~-----D .. -AY-· --- 28 Attorneys for Petitioner 29 30 31 32 -A-. Dist:rict 7_ · nor-vada land co. 869-C East Foothill Blvd. Upland, California 91786 Telephone 714/985-7281 October 7, 1971 Honorable Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County Post Off ice Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California Attention: Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager Re: Tentative Tract No. 7389 and Marion E. Jones Estate Gentlemen: A ·l.c> geuuc.1 1lt:Ui .,o._·--· _ ..... __ As stated in our letter of September 16, 1971, we are potential · subdlviders and·developers of the property of the Marion E. Jones Estate. We have been advised by our representative, Evans & Associates, Inc., that the Board refused annexation of the property at their meeting of September 30. The action of the Board was very dlsappotnttng to us, however we hope that favorable consideration wJI I be given to the appeal and· _petition which was filed by representatives of the estate on October I. · Although there appears to have been considerable dfscu~sion concerning the previous petition for annexation, we feel that certain pertinent points of Information were neither presented or were not given adequate consideration at your meetings of September 8 and 30. Also, the fol lowtn.g sequence of events wlll clearly indicate that we and our representatives have had continuous communication with representatives of·the District and have cooperated fully in meeting al I reasonable requests set forth. · The order of events concerning the development o~ the property . began when the petition for change of zona was flied with the Orang~ County PlannJng Commission on September 25, 1970, This Ag.enda ·I:tem #4 B-.1 · · ·-District-·7 · I . I L_.J -2- petition requested a change of zone to R4-PD. ·. Lega I not.i cos were publlshed. and posted that a hearing would be held before the Commission on December 16th •. A public hearing was· held on that date and subsequently. hcld·ov~r to meetings of December 30, 1970, and January 14, 1971, at which time the Planning Commission recommended to the Board of Supervisors that the property be rezoned to R4 (8000)-PD C4000). The Board of Superv t sors he Id a hearing on the matter on February ·17, 1971, and adopted the change of zone as recommended,· ,-- Although not a condition of zoningt the .Planning Comm-lssion required that we obtain another means of access to the property_ from Chapman Avenue prior to making any requests ·for develop- ment of the property. As a result of this condition we became ·involved in lengthy negotiations with the property owner souther- ly of subject prop~rty and were· eventually able to 6btatn an option to buy the land necessary.for access. This strip of land ts· shown on our maps as the northerly extensi~n of Crawford Canyon Road. · During this period of negotiation to obtain the requiyed access,. we and our representatives had two meetings with staff represent- atives of the City of Orange, explortng the possibility of annox~tion tq and development within the City. We were finally advised that· although the City was in the process of developing PUD ordinance permitting the type of development we proposed, there was no p·oss- lble way at that time that the.City could al low~ Planned Unit Development. (It is our understanding the City of Orange has not yet adopted a PUD ordinance.) For this reason, we instructed our planning team, Evans & Associates, Inc., and Anthony & Langford, to prepare plans tor submission to the County of Orange.under Its PUD ordinance.· Maps and plans were prepared and an application for a· Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract No. 7389 were filed with the Planning Commission on April 26, 1971, The area covered in the application and-In the tentative tract was tho first phase of the Master Plan of Development consisting of ~he approximate south- easterly 10 acres of the estate, This area was selected because it was adjacent to the principal access of Crawford Canyon Road, ~ The proposed development wa~ revie~od and recommended by County staff and Conditional Use Permit No, C-1425 together with Tent- ative Tract No. 7389 were approved by the Planning Commission on.June 8, 1971. The C6nditional Use Permit was approved by the . Board of Superv t sors .on Ju I y 14, 1971 • · ·Concurrently with our filing of the tentative map with the Planning· Commission on Apri I 26, 1971, Evans & Associates, Inc,, sent prints ·of the map to the County Sanitation District office, copy of trans- mittal enclosed, with a request for review and comments, A reply was received from your office dated Apri I 29, 1971, tentatively approving the layout and enclosing instructions for annexation, -. {. . . . Agenda Item ~~4 B-2 Distrlct 7' I• 1.. - r· -3- (Copy enclosed,) .It was necessarily our assumption upon receipt of District's tentative approval that there would be no.delays or questions regarding annexation and provisions for sewage di sposa 1. This assumption was confirmed on J~ly 20, 1971, shortly aftef approval of the tentative map and Conditional Use Permit, when Mr •. Gary Himes, of Evans & Associates, contacted Mr, Paul Hogan to request ·a copy of specifications ·which he needed to··prepare f i na I p Jans and. d·es i gn of the sewer system.. -·..-... . On August 3, fo 11 owing the norma I order of events in. a dove I op- ment of this type, Mrs. Maridayle Peay, Executrix of the Estate,. filed a petition for annexation for Tract No. 7389, consisting of 10 acres, which is Unit No, I of this project. Following the.ft I Ing of this petition on August 3, Evans & Associates were advised, on August 10, that the petition anq method of sewerage were not acceptable becatise (I) the c6nnecting sewer that we proposed to bui Id between Unit No. I and· the existing sewers tn Ryals Lane and Avenida Palmar would not bo in the District and could not be accepted or maintained by the District unless the whole property were anne~ed and (2) there was a possibiliti that the existing 10" main in Santiago Boulevard might become overloaded .at some future dat~ because the 10 acres of our development in ±he southerly corner was not originally planned to be served in that direction, On August 13~ Mr. Evans mot with Mr. Pa~I Hogan and Dr; John Sigler to resolve these problems. It is our understanding that tt was agreed at that meeting tb annex the entire property and provide sewer easements for the sewers to be constructed outside the f lrst unit. A copy of Mr. Evans letter dated Au~ust 16, setting· forth this understanding ts attached, Further tt was agreed that the effluent from the southeasterly· 10 acres although not planned to be served by the Santiago sewer, was such a smal I amount that as a p~actical matter it. could be carried by that sewer line, On August 20, Mr. Evans was informed that the apparent solution reached at his meeting of August 13, was not now acceptable and that the southeasterly 10 acres mu~t be drained to a sewer line t·n. Chapman Avenue to be constructed by the City of Orange, and that the whole matter was to be referred to your adjourned meet- i n~ held August 24th. As no action was taken at that meeting, Mr, Evans addressed a letter to the Board dated August 26, 1971, copy attached. On September 8, the Board aga l n considered this ri1atter and did not render a decision, but suggested that Unit No. I be served by connecting to the proposed City of Orange sewer line in ·chapman·Avenue, Not knowing the schedule of construction of this _proposed· sewer, and· further that.annexation to the City of Orange Agenda ·rtem #4 B-3 . District 7 I L. · .. -4- might ~e required in order to connect, we, in our letter of· September ·16th, offere~ to construct a portion of this sub~ trunk in Chapman Avenue under a ·reimbursement agreement. Thi~ w offer, although an agenda Item, was sompletely ignored at your I ast meeting of September .30th. , when the nnnexat ion wa.s ref used •. The above summary of e~ents, contrary to certain remarks made at the last meeting, clearly indicates that we were and have been advised on this matter by our representatives, but it is also apparent that our representatives may not have been fully advised as to the real problem concerning annexation;. At the meeting there was nothing mentioned regarding· the increased· connection charges and tho Increased tax base which this type of development wt I I create over and above a standard R-1 subdivision, We feel this should be considered by the Board in making a .decision. ." I A comparision of the costs and revenues from the development of this property based upon 8,000 square foot lot size as suggested by the City of Orange, is as fo I I ows: . , . Planneo Unit Development · . Annexation Fee 37.204 acres @ $297.00/acre $11,049.59 . Connection Fee *330 units @ $150.00 $49,500.00 TOTAL *Inclusive 3 acres for park **· Inclusive acre for ·park R-1 Development Annexation fee ~7.204 acres@ $297.00/acre $11 ,049 .59 Connection Fee **124 units ~ $150.00 $18,600.00 TOTAL $29,649.59 The.· add it i ona I fe~ paid for this deve I opment wou Id be $~0', 900. 00. ~ Tax Base for revenue purposes: Planned Unit Development 330 units x $25,000 market value = ·$8,250,000.00 . . . 2 recreation centers = $250,000,00 TOTAL $8,500,000.00 Agenda Item #4 B-4 : • .l • . R-f" Development ,.24 units x $30,000.00 = $3,720,000.00 . rOTAL S3,720,000.00 Dist.rict 7 · •. i::· 25% of Market Value = $2,125,000.00 -5- ·25% of Market Value = $930,000.00 Annual Tax Revenue to Sanitation District No. 7 Annual Tax Revenue to Sanlt~tion District No. 7 x $0.47/ $100.00 = $9,987.50 · . x $0. 4 7 I S.1 oo. oo ·: = $4 • 3 71 • 00 It is therefore quite evident from tho ab9ve figures that the "development of the property as a Planned 8nit Development under the zoning granted by the Orange County Board of .Supervisors wlll not only more than double the initi.al fee and connection charges paid to the District but wtl I also provide for.a tax base and annual revenue which is .approxi~ately equal to the Increased density. . . tn view of al I of the above facts, we feel that your Honorable Body should reconsider yo~r previous action and approve annexat- ion of the property at your next meeting of October 13, 1971. Yours very truly, NOR-VADA LAND cmtiPANY 1(./~ R. T. Hebard RTH:djb Encl. .,. · Agenda Item #4 B-5 ··District T • " r .... ,• EVANS & ASSOCIATES, I NC. • Surveying • Planning • Subdivisions 1543 West Garvey Avenue • Mailing Address: P.O. Box 458 • West Covina, California • Phone 962-4081 October 1971 Nor-Vada Land Company 869-C E. Foothi I I Blvd. Upland, California Attention: Mr. R. T. Hebard Re: Project-Pacific Homes of El ModHno Marion E. Jones Estate Dear Sir: Pursuant to your request of October 15, 1971, we have made a study of some ot the effects that would result from the development of tbe Marion E. Jones Estate under R-1 and PUD zoning. The study and subsequent comparisons are based upon three alternate plans, two of them as R-1 developments and the third as the Planned Unit Development for which the property is zoned. The occupancy factors used in the study were obtained from Mr. Roy Gohara, Senior Planner of the Orange County Planning Commission staff. These factors are as fol lows: Low Priced R-1 Development C60%-3 Rodrooms, 40%-4 Bedrooms) 3 Bedroom-3,7 occupants per dwcl I ing 4 Bedroom-3~82 occupants per dwelling Planned Unit Development Cby actual census) McKoewn Development 2 and 3 Aedrooms-1.4 occupants per dwelling Rossmore Development 2 and 3 Bedrooms-2.52 occupants per dwel linq 4 Bedrooms-3.0 occupants per dwelling (projected) .• . Your intended price range for this would fal I between McKoewn and Rossmore. Therefore, factors of 2, 2.5 and 3,0 are used for the 2, 3 and 4 bedroom units respectively. Information relating to the Sanitation District No. 7 Master Page 2 Plan was obtained froM Mr. Ray Lewis of the Sanitation District. This master plan of Boyle Engineering indicated th& probable development of this property as single family residential, having a maximum density of 6 units per acre. TherRfore, it is reason- ably assumed that tho required capacity has been planned for the entire estate at this density as it is relatively flat and does not require extensive grading as most of the undeveloped property to the east, The estate conslsted of 39.145 acres at the time the master plan was developed, being prior to the sale of 1,941 acres to the City of Orange for a water reservoir site. For comparison purposes the total area has been used even though the net developable is now only 36,204 acres, The projection of certain factors usin~ the density as planned for are as tot lows= Alternate A: Land use intensity-6 units per acre CR-I single family) Land area-39.145 acres R-1 units= 39.145 acres x 6 units per acre= 235 units Estimated Market Value = 235 x $28,000,00 = $6,580,000,00 Estimated Population (80%-3 Bedrooms> 188 x 3,7 = 696 (20%-4 Bedrooms) 47 x 3.82 == IBO TOTAL Estimated Plu~bing fixture units 188 x 16 = 3,008 47 x 20 = 940 TOTAL 3,948 Annexation fee at present rate 876 39,145 acres@ $297.00 = $1 I ,626,07 Page 3 Connection Fees 235 @ $ 150.00 = $35,250.0Q. TOTAL FEES $46,876.07 Estimated annual revenue 25% x $6,580,000.00 x .50 per $100,00 = $B,225,00 These same factors, if the property were developed using an 8,000 square foot minimum fat area as suggested by the City of Orange, are as fol lows: Alternate B: Land use intensity-3,5 units per acre CR-I sinqle faMi ly) Land area-36.204 acres (net, exclusive of reservoir and homesite, but including I acre park site> R-1 Units -35.204 x 3.5 units per acre = 123 Estimated Market Value -123 x $32,000.00 average -$3,936,000.00 Estimated Population (60%-3 Bedroo'M) 74 x 3.7 = 274 (40%-4 Bedroom) 49 x 3.82 = 18~ TOTAL 461 Estimated Plumbing fixture units 74 x 16. = t , I B4 49 x 20 =_980 TOTAL 2, 164 Annexation Fee at present rate 37,204 acres@ 297.00 = S I I ,049.59 Connection Fees 123 @ $150.00 = TOTAL Estimated annual revenue 18,450,00 $29,499.59 25% x $3~936,00 x .50 per $100,00 = $4,920.00 These same factors, usinq the Planned Unit Development as approved by the County of Orange, a re pr.oj ec"ted as fo I I ows: Alternative C: Land use intensity-9,12 units per acre CPUDJ Land area-36,204 acres (net, exclusive of reservoir and home site, but including 2,64 acres park site) Page 4 Estimated Market Value-330 x $25,000.00 +recreational faci Ii ties = $8,500,000.00 PUD units-36,204 x 9.12 units per acre= 330 Estimated Population: 2 Bedroom) 198 x 2.0 = 396 3 Bedroom) 96 x 2.5 = 240 4 Bedroom) 36 x 3,0 =-108 TOTAL 744 Fixture units-from pf ans TOTAL ~4,468 Annexation Fee 37.204 acres @ $?97.00 = $ I I ,049,59 Connection Fee 330 @ $150,00 = 49,500,00 TOTAL FEES $60,549,59 Estimated annual revenue 25% x $8,500,000,00 x ,50 per $100,00 : $10,625,00 A comparison fo these factors followst Area Units Density Population Alternate A --------- 39. i 45 235 6 per acre 876 Alternate B __ .....,.. _____ ·- 39. 145* 123 3, 14 per acre* 461 Alternate C ........_,...,..._......,._._ - 39, 145* 330 8~43 per acre* 744 Page 5 Alternate A Alternate B Alternate Fixture Units 3,948 2, r 24 4,468 Fees $46,B76,07 $29,499.59 $60,549,59 Market Value $6,580,000.00 $3,936,000.00 $8,500,000,00 Annual Hevenue $8,225.00 $4,920.00 $10,625,00 Revenue per acre $210,12 $125069 $271,43 'Revenue per· person $9.39 $10.67 $f fle28 *same total area as Royle Master Plan for comparison purposes, The quantity of sewage effluent bein~ approximately proportional to the population, Alternate C-the PUD, would discharge only 85% of effluent that was projected for the area in the Boyle Master Plan. In our op1n1on a comparison of f i*ture unJts to estimate discharge is not really meaningful I but, if a comparison is made on this basis• the tota I uni ·!·s in A I tornate C is s I i ght I y higher, However, if water saving (20%) plumbin~ fixtures are usod on toilets and showers which comprise 60% of water usaqe and subsequent sewage ~ff luent, the equivalant fixture units would be reduced from 4,468 to 3,932 or approximately e~ual to Alternate A, A comparison of the revenue indicates that if the property is developed under Alternate C, tho District wi I I receive initial tees that are $13,673,52 in excess of Alternate A and $31 ,050,00 ·~n excess of AltQrnate B. The annual revenue from Alternate C is $2,400,00 greater than A and $5,705.00 greater than B, Even more significant, the revenue per occupant or given unit of sewage effluent is $4e89 or 52% qreater than A and $3,61 or 33Z greater than B, In conclusion it is our op1n1on that the development of the Ma~ion E. Jones Estate in accordance with the present PUD zoning and approved plan wi I I cause less sewage to be discharqcd than has been provided for and wi I I be of further benefit to District 7 because of the greatly increased revenue resulting. Yours very truly, EVANS & ASSOCIATES. INC, .... 7 /1 -~--· / ~,~/ }1~-z;-;7k~,.._ Ronald Nottingham RN:djb c COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO . 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY Study of Potential Increases in Sewa g e Flo w Resulting From the Possible Rezoning of C e rtain Areas In a nd Adjacent to the North e rl y Portion o f Co unty Sanitation Di s trict No. 7 From Lo w-Dens ity Resi d e ntial to Medium -Dens ity Reside ntial La n d Use OBJECTIVE The objective is to estimate the possible increase in sew age flow, over and above t hat estimated in the Master Plan Trun k Sewer Facilities, dated May 1969, from undeveloped areas of low-density residential zoned property (Orange County ' Zone AR 10000), within or adjacent to t he boundaries of the Di s trict, in the event of future r ezoning to an ultimate land use of medium-density reside ntial (Orange County Zone R4 (8 000), PD (400 0)), as rec e ntl y approved by the Orange County Planning Commission for Tentative Tract No. 7389. GENERAL The master plan includes an area outside the District's boundary of approxi ma tely 2,806 acres with an ultimate land use classification of low-dens ity residential (hills ide) with small areas of lo w -de nsity residential (lots above 10,000 square feet), low-density residential, medium-density residential and commercial zone as shown on Plate l of the master plan. The areas and unit flo w coeffi cients used in th e master plan for d e term ining design flo ws from the 2,806 ac res are: Land Use C lass ification Low-dens i ty res id entia l (hi ll s id e) Lo w -d ens ity r es i d e ntial (lots above 10,000 square fee t) Lo w -de nsity resid en tial M e dium-de nsity res id e ntial Commercial Total Are a Outside Di stric t Bounda ri es Area in Acres 2,288 83 320 124 91 2,806 !1 n Y I f" 1 · t I C, I ; I l l ;> I t I (, Average Unit Fl ow C o e fficients .0010 cfs/ac. .0018 cfs/ac. .0024 cfs/ac. .0060 cfs/ac. • 0050 cfs/ QC• There are 813 acres of undeveloped property within the District, similar in character tO the low-density residential portion of the above 2, 806 acres, which could also be rezoned to medium-density residential. The land use classifications within the 813 acres and their corresponding average unit flow coefficients as contained in the master plan are: Land Use Classification Low-density residential (hillside) · Low-density residential Area in Acres 622 191 Total Area Within District Boundaries 813 Average Unit Flow Coefficients .0010 cfs/ac. • 0024 cfs/ ac. The recent zone change of 37 .2 acres in master plan tributary area T0-7, which is outside the boundaries of the District, from low-density residential to medium- density residential (Orange County Zone R4 (8000), PD (4000)), as approved by the Orange County Planning Commission on June 8, 1971, and confirmed by Board of Supervisors• Resolution No. 71-817, dated July 14, 1971, results in an increase in density from 3.3 dwelling units per net acre, excluding public streets and parks, to 9.5 dwelling units per acre as approved for Tract No. 7389. Theoretically, the PD (4000) zone could result in a maximum of 10.9 dwelling· units per gross acre if no public streets are included, since the private streets, common areas and recreation areas of the planned development are included in the gross acreage in computing the number of dwelling units permitted. CRITERIA The following criteria were used in determining the probable increase in the estimated sewage flow from the study area, both in county areas and within the present. city limits of the city of Orange, if a general rezoning of undeveloped low-density residential land to medium-density residential (PD (4000) should take place at some time in the future. -2 - n 0 y L E f.~ N G I N r r: H I fJ (:; 1. The areas of low-density residential land which are now developed will probably remain equivalen~ to Orange County Zone AR 10000 with an average unit flow coefficient of .0010 cfs/ac. for low- density residential (hillside) and .0024 cfs/ac. for low-density residential. 2. Undeveloped land now zoned low-density residential (AR 10000) having natural slopes of 30 percent or less could be zoned R4 (8000), PD (4000) and ultimately reach an average unit flow coefficient of .0060 cfs/ac. 3. Undeveloped land now zoned low-density residential (AR 10000) having natural slopes of more than 30 percent wil I not be developed to a density greater than AR (lOPOO) with an average unit flow coefficient of .0010 cfs per acre. PROCEDURE Using aerial photos dated August 1971, and U.S. Geological Survey contour maps, the study area was separated into the three categories described above for that portion outside the District's boundaries and for that portion within the District's boundaries. Due to time limitations, this study was restricted to the northern portion of District No. 7 where the possibility of future rezoning appears to have a substantial effect upon the District's facilities. The ·increase in sewage flows from those areas where an increase in population density could occur was detennined and the effect of the increased sewage flow on the District's existing and proposed master plan facilities was calculated. Treatment plant requirements were not studied due to time limitations. -3 - fJ 0 Y L r: E N G I r-l C L R I N G CONCLUSIONS Based on the above criteria it was determined, for the 2, 806. acres outside the Distr~ct's boundary, that 565 acres are presently developed as low-density residential and will _remain as such, 1,706 acres are undeveloped and have natural slopes of 30 percent or less and, therefore, are subiect to rezoni.ng, and 535 acres are undeveloped but not subiect to rezoning due to terrain having slopes in excess of 30 percent. Within the District's boundaries 813 acres are subiect to rezoning because of slopes 30 percent or less. The increase in flows for the study areas are summarized in Exhibits A and B. The increased flows from the area outside the District including a small portion of the increase from within the District, will be collected by the proposed Tustin-Orange trunk sewer. This increase would require that the Tustin-Orange trunk be enlarged by two pipe sizes for its entire length as indicated in Exhibit A. The additional construction cost for the increased capacity is estimated at about $500, 000. The increased flows from the 813 acres within the District will require the construction of a new 8-inch VCP relief sewer parallel to the Foothill-Newport subtrunk from the beginning of the Foothil I-Newport subtrunk to Santa Clara and Newport Avenue, and a new 8-inch VCP relief trunk from Santa Clara and Newport Avenue to the proposed Tustin-Orange trunk at Santa Clara and Esplanade. The estimated construction cost for these two relief facilities to the proposed Tustin-Orange trunk sewer is $240,000. The pipe sizes shown in Exhibit A are adequate to carry the additional sewage from the Foothill-Newport Relief Trunk. A small amount of flow will also be added to the Lemon Heights trunk which has the capacity to handle it. -4- fJOYL.C CNG!NCCF?ING From Exhibit B it is evident that the estimated sewage flow (6. 1 mgd average) resulting from rezoning of low-density residential land to medium-density residential, for 1,706 acres outside the District, and 813 acres inside the District will overload al I reaches of the Red Hi 11 Interceptor Sewer and the Sunflower Interceptor Sewer. SUMMARY The possible rezoning of 2,519 acres of undeveloped land from low-density to medium-density residential land use could result in an increase of 6. 1 mgd (9.4 cfs) in the average sewage flows tabulated in the master plan for areas tributary to the Red Hill trunk sewer. To conform to the design criteria set forth in Section V of the master plan, it will be necessary to increase the pipe size of all reaches of the Tustin-Orange trunk by two pipe increments (6 inches of pipe diameter) at an estimated additional construction cost of $500,000, and to construct an 8-inch VCP relief sewer for the Foothill-Newport subtrunk at an estimated construction cost of $240 ,000. An increase of 6.1 mgd (9 .4 cfs) in the average sewage flow would surcharge the entire length of the Red Hill trunk and the Sunflower trunk as these facilities are now constructed or under contract and increasing their design capacity is not feasible. Due to time limitations we have not been able to evaluate the effect of increased tax revenue due to the increased property values resulting from rezoning, or to estimate the time required to recover the capital cost of $740,000. Conrad Hohener, Jr., C. E. 10951 ps 10/27/71 -5 - flOYL.C ENGIN!.~£:HING ( ( ( EXHIBIT A TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK REQUIREMENTS : .. Pl an Facilities Requirements Master Due to Rezoning ;4 Total Limits Design Design Capacity Flow Flow Reach From To Size mgd (cfs) mgd (cfs) mgd (cfs) Size 18 Orange Park Acres Blvd. Chapman Ave. 15" 3.4 ( 5.2) 2.5 ( 4) 5.2 ( 0. 1) 18 II 17 1,500 1 n/o Hewes Ave. 0 range Park Acres Blvd. 15 11 3.8 ( 5. 9) 3.8 ( 6) 9.2 (14.3) 21 11 16 1,450 1 n/o Bond Ave. 1,500' n/o Hewes Ave. 18 11 3.8 ( 5. 9) 3.8 ( 6) 9.2 (14.3) 24 11 15 Walnut Ave. 1,450' n/o Bond Ave. 15 11 3.8 ( 5. 9) 3.8 ( 6) 9.4 (14.6) 21 11 14 Chapman Ave. Walnut Ave. l 8 11 4.1 ( 6.3) 4.5 ( 7) 9,9 ( 15. 3) 24 11 13 La Veta Ave. Chapman Ave. 21 11 6.2 ( 9.6) 5.8 ( 9) 12.6 (19. 5) 27 11 12 Seventeenth St. La Veta Ave. 18" 0.0 (12.4) 7.1 (11) 15.2 (23.6) 24 11 11 Fourth St. Seventeenth St. 21 11 8.2 (12. 7) 7.8 (12) 16.0 (24.8) 27 11 10 Mitchell Ave. Fourth St. 24 11 9.9 (15.4) 9.0 (14) 17.0 (26.3) 30 11 10/27/71 ( ( EXHIBIT B EXISTING OR COMMITTED FACILITIES Master Plan Facilities Limits Design Capacity Flow Reach From To Size mgd (cfs) mgd (cfs) Red Hill Interceptor 9 1,3201 s/o Valencia Ave. Mitchell Ave. 36 11 21 (33) 21 (33) 7&8 Dyer Road 1,3201 s/o Valencia Ave. 39 11 34 (53) 33 (51) 6 McGaw Ave. Dyer Road 42 11 43 (67) 41 (64) 4&5 Main Street McGaw Ave. 63 11 47 (73) 47 (73) Sunflower Interceptor 3 Main Street Red Hill Ave. 66 11 58 (90) 58 (90) 2 Raitt Street Main Street 78 11 73 (113) 73 (113) Treatment Plant l Raitt Street 84 11 85 (132) 81 (125) 10/27/71 Peak Flow Due to Rezoning mgd (cfs) 29 (45) 41 (63) 49 (76) 54 (84) 65 (101) 80 (124) 88 (136) ( Meeting Date DISTPiICT 1 Gris et Miller Porter Battin DISTRICT 2 SlYlith ~is tie Clark Culver Finnell Herrin Just Sims _ Stephenson _ Wedaa Winn Battin DISTRICT 3 Hyde Berton Christie Clark . Culver Davis Green Harper Harvey Herrin .Hemeon T-T~lden \wVlhinney Sims ··-Stephens-on _ Battin DIS'f RI CT · 5 Parsons Hirth Battin DISTRICT 6 Porter Mc Inn.is Battin DISTF.ICT 7 Miller _£..__ G"Q se=e ./ Porter ~ Rogers ~ Smith ~ Battin __..c' . DISTRICT 11 "'liipley ~en Battj_n · DISTRICT 8 BOYtl . . __:.. Mitchell · Battin ·-. fo,-12.11 Time 1 v Districts -~----- Herrin Coco Hileman Root Jackson Gomez Gris et Harper Zuniga Dutton Machado .Schniepp Kroes en Westra Ropt Jackson Fonte McCraclrnn Just Kan el Gris et Lewis Hogard Zuniga Dutton Croul Hirth Coco· Herrin Hj_rth Hileman ·- ----·----·--------~----·-~~ ··--- McCracken Goldberg --JOINT BOAIIDS -Just Berton ·christie Clark Coen Culver Davis _.Finnell Green Gris et -Harper -·Harvey. -Hem.eon ·Harper -Westra· -Root Jackson Fonte Gomez 1 ·McCracken Herrin Just Kanel Lewis Gris et -Croul =Hogard Kroes en -Hirth Herrin· Hirth Holden Hyde Mcinni~ McWhinney · -Miller -Coco ---Parsons Porter Rog·ers -Hirth Shipley -McCracken Sims -Zuniga Smith -Hileman _.___ Stephenson-Dutton Wedaa · -Machado Winn -Schniepp Battin * * Mitchell· Boyd -Goldberg OTHERS Harper Brm·m Sylvester---V:- Lewis ~ Dunn Clarke Sigler Crabb Carlson Finster Galloway _..,.. Hohener ~ Hunt -1L Keith Lowry Maddox Martinson- Nisson - Piersall ./~:ens :Z ~~tA ~Ut;;· 1AJl ~t.F . .., 1;:!d- II MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California J~INT B ©~R DS ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING Wedn esday , October 27, 1971 7 :30 p.m. Post Office Box 8127 l 0844 Ellis Avenue Fou nta in Val l ey, Calif., 9270 8 Telephones: Area Code 7 14 540-29 10 962-2411 October 22 , 1971 Although the principle purpose of this adjourned meeting is a further discussion of personnel matters (Items 5 through 7) carried over from the regular meeting on October 13th , two additional Joi nt Board items (8 and 9 )-have been included in the agenda because of their urgency . In addition, consideration of individual District matters in Districts Nos. 5 , 6 and 7 have bee~ included . The following is a brief explanation of the more important non - routin e items which appear on the enclosed agenda an~ which are not otherwise self-explanatory . Joint Boards Nos . t:) and 7 -PERSONNEL MATTERS CARRIED OVER FROM THE QC.TOBER 13TH MEETING : Two personnel matte~s were considered i n executive ·session at the last Joint Meetine with further discussion and possible action postponed to this adjourned meeting . These matters r e l ate to the current negotiations with the Orange County Employees Association and employment of part-time constru ction inspectors . lvith regard to the first matter, a c ommittee of the directors consisting of Messrs . Dexter Hemeon, Chairman ; John Burt on and Lindsley Parsons, was appointed to meet with the staff and to report at this meeting. This committee met on October 19th and a copy of its report is enclosed for the directors only . In addition , the staff has prepared supplemental material relating to thi s subject which is also enclosed . With respect to the employment of part-time construction inspectors, the staff will present additional material a nd recommendations on th:ls matter at the meeting . · No. 8 -PROPOSED NEW STATE POLICY REGARDING DISCHARGE OF WASTE WATER TO 'l'HE OCEAN : I reported to the Joint Boards on this subject on October 13th and pointed out the impact on the finances of the Districts to c omply with the regulations embodied in the proposed State policy . At the conclusion of the discussion , the staff was asked to prepare a r eport on the possible effects on the Districts ' tax rates if the new regulations are adopted . Since the regular Board Meeting , we have re aeive d a draft of the propoaed policy , and a notice calling for public hearings on November 18th and December 2nd, a copy of wh1·c11 is included with the agenda material . Inasmuch as t h e date for t he first hearing i s a little over one week from the next regular meeting on November 10th , it is advisable to take this matter u p at t h is meeting to determine the Boards ' position which will g ui de the staff in actions b efore and at t h ese publ~c h earings . The engineers and staff are no w working up the mater:La l to present to the Boards at the meeting o n this matter . No. 9 -AUTHORITY TO PURCHASE PARKING LIGHT FIXTURES : Presently , we are u s i n~ temporary lighting in our new enlarged parking l ot at the Administrative Offic e Building . We have consulted the Districts ' arch- itect and Mr . Parsons, Chairman of the Bu ild ing Comm i ttee, r egarding the typ e of permanent light fixt u res to be installed . I n order to erect the selected fixtures with Districts ' forces with the l east possible delay , we are rec omm ~nding the action appearing o n t h e agenda authorizing a ward of' purchase of t e n fixtures and appurtenances at a total c ost not to exceed $2,500 . Distri ct No . 7 No . 1 7 -AWARD OB' CONTRAC~ 7 -6-J~-: Bids for t his interceptor sewer project , the Red Hill In t erceptor , Reaches 6, 7 and 8 , were opened on October 19t h and a record 21 bids were received , i ncluding bid-s fr om firms with he ad - quarter s in San Jose, San Diego and Phoenix . A bid tabu lation is included in the agenda materia l whic h i:ndic.ates that the low pid submitted by Nor t hern Contracting Company of Newbury Park was approximately $92 ,000 under the Engineer 's Estimate . Since the staff and engineers will not h ave the opportunity of interviewing th i s firm until October 26 t h , a definite recommendatlon f or award cannot be made at this time . However , preliminary investigation indicates that this firm i~ wil ling to proceed with the contract at its bid price . After conclusion of the intervieN and further investigation of the contractor 's references we will be in a position to make a definite recommendation for award at the meeting . No s . 18 and 19 -EXCHANGE OF LICENSE T O OCC UPY FO H GRANT OF EASEMENT : The Directors will r ecall that some time ago there was a discussion of acquiring additional right -of -way on the West Trunk S ewer , south o f McFadden A~enue . The land own er involved , Angie Rados , has now offered and pre pared a grant of an add itional 10 foot wide easement 1330 feet long on h e r property , i n exchange for District granting the l and owner the right t o occ u py , wi th n on -per manent improvements , thi s easement and th e existing Distr i ct 's 20 foo t right -of -way which is owned in fee . We r ecommend the acceptance of t he easement and the gran t of lice nse . No. 20 -ACCEPTANCE OF AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR PLAZA DRIVE SUBTRUNK SEWER : The Boa r d members will recall that in March of this year , t he Dis tri ct entered into an agreement with the City of Santa An a whereby t h e City would pay out of their District No . 7 's sewe r connection charge fund t h e cost of constru ction of this subtrunk sewer which is n ow complete and ready for acceptanc e . At the same time ,· the Board agree d in principle t o a reimbursemen t agreement with C. J . Segerstrom a n d Sons by which the District would r eimburse that f irm 's out -of-pocke t co st s f or the construc - tion work u ndertaken by them . The f i nal cost to the Segerstrom firm has b ee n d etermined b y the s t aff to be $44 ;o64 .12 . We , therefor e , recommend adoption of a r esolu tion a uthorizing an agreemen t for reimbur~ement of this amount to the SeGerstrom firm , contin ge n t upon rec eiv ing fund s from the CiLy of Santa Ana f or the t otal cost of the pro j ect . -2 - I No . 21 -OVERSIZING OF FACILITY IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO . 9 : We . have been advis ed that a letter will be forthcoming in behalf of Mr . Frank Mead offering to pay the differenc e in cost of ove rsi zing one of the sewers proposed to be included ln the assessment district .. At the time of this writin g , t his letter has not yet be en received but will be included in the agenda ma teria l at the mee ting if received prior to that time . Districts Nos . 5 and 6 No . 26 -PROPOSAL TO EAR TICIPNrE IN COST OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY SEWER CROSSING WITH DONALD J. STOLTZ AND COMPANY : The above company is the d eve l oper of a large apartment compl ex in the City o f Newport Beach and i n District No. 6. Th e devel oper proposes t o enter into an arrangem e nt with the Hoag Hospita l , wh e r eby a sewer serving both properties will be c o nstru cted and connected to the Dlstricts 1 gravity trunk sewer on the south side of Pacific Coast Highway , a f ew hundred feet northwest c f the ~ Newport Boulevard overcrossing. In view of the fact t hat it is believed by the District No . 5 e ngin eer and staff that a portion of the Districts • gravity sewer, southeas t o f this point (see following item ) wil l, in the near future , require a n ew parallel sewer and abandonment o f the existing section, and that this new parallel sewe r can conveniently us e the same hig hw ay crossing proposed by the Stol t z firm , it appears that a distinct savings can be r eal i zed by entering into an agreement with this firm t o oversiz e the crossing for the ·two .Districts 1 future ne eds . ·If the Districts und e rtook this crossing a t a later dat e , total cost is estimated t o be approximately $18 ,000 , wh ereas the cost of oversizing the propos e d crossing will be mu ch less . Th e staff accordingly r ecrnmnends that it be a u thorl zed to negot iate with the Stoltz Com pany for r eimbursemen t of the cost of oversizing this connection . Afte r a mutu ally acceptable figure has been arrived at , further Board authorization to enter into an agreement will be re comme nded . No . 27 -INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL WORK IN CONTRACT 5 -19 (COAST HIGHWAY . F ORCE MAIN ): This contract , now u nder desig n , involves the construct i on of a n e w f orce main between Rocky Point and the Santa Ana River . A total of $764 ,000 has b ee n budgeted by the two Districts for this contract wr1ic h is expected to be awarded during t he first part of next year . The Districts • engineer and staff have long rec ogni zed that a por- tion of the existing gravity s e we r n ear the Arches needs to be paralleled and replaced because of its severe maintenance problem and the gene r ation o f gases . (See p receeding item ). This situation i s caused by a reve r se gradient in· t h e existing trunk sewer wh ic h was constru cted in the 1 930 1 s . I t appears that with the sharply escalating costs o f sewe r constru ction , i t wo u ld be expe d ient to include this parallel gravity sewer , estimated t o cost in the neighborhood of $50 ,000 , in the contract for the force main sin ce the contractor will be work ing in this area next year . We theref o re r ecommend that the Board consid e r a u thorizing inclusion of this a d ditional wo rk in the force main contract as a separate bid item . I f the bids received exceed the budgeted fig ure for the ·forc e main , a decision can be r eached at that time as to wh e the r to delete and postpone the parallel sewer work to a fu ture date . The staff will b e p r epared to go into this matt e r and that of the p receeding item in g r ea t er d eta il at t h e meeting , if desired ,.and will display drawings t o assist the Directors iq understanding the staff 1 s r ecommendations . -3 - Distric t No . 5 Nos . 30 through 33 -CLOSEOUT OF CONTRACT 5 -18 : The Directors will recall ~ that this contract was accepted and a Notice of Completion a uthorized to be filed at the October 13th Board Meetj_ng. However , at that time , the staff poin ted out that we and the General Counsel were negotiating wi t h the contractor , Zurn Engineers , over certain matters in dispute . These di sput ed matters include an extension of time caused by delays in receiving necessary Corp of Engineers and Harbor Department permits and the amount of r ental payment for property tempora r ily oc cupied by the contractor . These rental payment s , under the contract, are to be deducted fr om the contract p rice . We have now reached agreement with the contractor who has signed the n ece ssary documents, and recommend that the actions app earing on the agenda be adopted . Item No . 28 is change order No . 2 , adding the sum of $1 ,728 for u navoidable Distric t caused delay in his work . Item No . 29 change order No . 3 is the extension of time agreed upon j and Item No . 30 is a d educti on of $17 ,000 for the agTeed upon rental p ayments d escribed above . Item lifo . 31 is t h e approval of the execution of a Final Closeout Agreement with the contractor, which is deemed to be advisable by the s ta ff and General Co u nsel because of the disputed matters . Fred A. Harpe r Gen eral Manag e r -4 - -""' Meeting Date [ o j·::nb I DISTP~CT 1 ~~s@:t "" Herrin Miller ./ Coco Porter. ~ cl ~"4 .-L_ Battin ./ DISTRICT 2 Smith ./ -Hileman ~is tie ./ Root ark -r Jackson Culver ../ Finnell -r Gomez Herrin -r Gris et -.Just Harper .,/ Sims -r Zuniga Stephenson ~ Dutton Wedaa --r Machado Winn --r Schniepp Battin --;- DISTRICT 3 Hyde ./ Kroes en Berton ~ Westra Christie / Root Clar le ~ . Jackson ~~;r:r. -7~ Green ./ Harper ./ Harvey ./ Herrin __£_ Hemeon ../ Ft>l de11 _£:::: ~Whinney ~ Sims ..; Zuniga Stephenson ~ Dutton Battin ./ DISrrRICT · 5 Parsons Hirth Battin DISTRICT Porter Mcinnis Battin . ./ -r 6 ~ -r ~ - Croul Hirth Time -- ---- - ru~~· -- . DISTRICT ll ~~ipley ~ McCracken ~.. •en .; Battin · .. 7 _ N.§~pipTf§ . Boyer . . "" · . Goldbe:L"g Mitchell ~ Battin ?.·30 ·- - -• Districts _cv ....... ) .... I.__ __ _ - .JOINT BOAPJ)S Just Berton Christie Clark Coen Culver Davis Finnell Green Harper =.Westra· Root =·Jackson 6 15E!S& =.Harper _ Harvey . _a_ Fonte ~Gomez ~McCracken _Herrin Just Kanel Lewis Hemeon Herrin· . Hirth Holden Hyde Mcinnis =Griset. Croul · o Hogard Kroes en Hirth -McWhiruiey Miller Parsons Porter -.lL. Coco ---Rogers -Hirth Shipley -McCracken Sims --Zuniga Smith -Hileman Stephenson-Dutton Wedaa · · ~Machado Winn -Schniepp Battin - •* * Mitchell Boyd -Goldberg - OTHERS Harper J Brm-m ../ Sylvester ,,<'. .Lewis · /" Dunn ~ Clarke _L Sigler Crabb .~ Carlson Finst.er ·- Galloway - Hohener --:;;- Hunt -:;;- Keith Lowry Maddox Martinson- Nisson Piersall ~ Stevens .,,, La~L .· I TELEPHONE 633-2300 \..,I ORANGE. CALIFORNIA 92666 Orange County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 687 Santa Ana, California 92701 Gentlemen: October 19, 1971 It has been brought to my attention that at the meeting of Y,our Honorable Board to be held on October 26, you will be discussing an assess- ment district for sanitary sewers "in certain unincorporated areas· immediately east of the City of Orange and at the same. time you will be considering a community plan for the Orange Park Acres area presented to you by the Orange Park Acres Planning Conunittee. It is difficult for me to understand how these two items are under the same agenda item, as I have been told. The proposed assessment district for sanitary sewers in this area has been under consideration for some time by the people in that area who have been working with the City of Orange for the extension of a· sanitary sewer from the eastern Orange city limits to a point approximately 3,000 feet easterly where the assessment district will tie its sanitary sewer in. As far back as last June 22, the Orange City Council adopted an agree- ment wherein it is stated that the City would provide assistance to the Sanitary District. This assistance is in the form of a contribution of $33,750 for the construction o~ a sanitary sewer along East Chapman Avenue. The field survey work for this sanitary sewer has been completed by the ·Department of Public·Works and plans and specifications are now under design. The Orange Park Acres Community Plan was presented to me under a cover letter dated October 4, and this has been referred to the City Planning staff for comment to the City Planning Commission and the .City Council. It will not be possible for the City of Orange to comment on the proposed community plan for Orange Park Acres at your meeting of October 26. These two items should not be tied together as one item on your agenda • . · INCORPORATED APRIL 6, 1900 Orange County Board of Supervisors October 19, 1971 Page Two I would request that you approve the assessment district for the sanitary sewer, but that your consideration of the Orange Park Acres Community Plan be delayed until the City of Orange can make its comments. DES:cg cc: David Baker Robert Battin Ronald Caspers .Ralph Clark William Phillips . Fred Harper Sin~erely, Don E. Smith Mayor COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. a. sax 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 EL.LIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWA'r'.') The Honorable Alan Cranston United States Senate Washington, D. c.. 20510 October 22, 1971 TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 Re: Proposed California State Policy for Water Quality Control -General Principles .and Provisions for Discharge to Ocean Waters -State Water Resources Control Board Hearings~ November 18th and December 2nd~ 1971 Dear Senator Cranston: I belj_eve that the enclosed referenced State Policy for Dischargers to Ocean Waters represents a sincere effort by the staff of the California State Water Resources Control Board to comply with the federal requirements set forth in' the Federal Register, Tuesday, July 13, 1971 (excerpt enclosed.) The State Board desires to establish general principles, water quality objectives and discharge restrictions which will be acce~table to the Environmental Protection Agency in ·lieu of 12. Removal of not less than 85% of five- day biochemical oxygen.demand;" as this federal requirement is not applicable to open ocean waters. The proposed new state policy for discharge to ocean waters will require major capital and operational expenditures without a measureable benefit to our environment as there is not sufficient scientific knowledge on which to base these requirements. In spite of a long history of marine waste disposal with gradually improving techniques and methods of wastewater treatment, there is relatively little scientifically based knowledge on the influence of treated wastewater on the ecology of adjacent coastal waters. In fact, the true situation has frequently been obscured by conflicting claims that waste discharges have damaged or enhanced the beneficial uses of the ocean. ..· .. The Honorable Alan Cranston October 22J ·1971 Page 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE. F~UNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540·2910 (714) 962·2411 If the regulations embodied in the proposed state policy regarding discharge of wastewater to the ocean is adopted we will be faced with an immediate capital expenditure of approximately $35,000,000 in addition to our current construction program. To qualify for state and federal grant funding assistance, currently existing and proposed, this construction must be accom~lished within a period of two to three years. Our annual operating cost$ will increase from $2.5 million to $5.4 million in the next four years. The Orange County taxpayer's tax bill will increase by 128% for the service being provided by the County Sanitation Districts. It appears that these funds could be better expended in the wastewater pollution control field on recognizable pollution problems with known· solutions. In the past two decades, beginning research efforts have been carried out in the United States and abroad which have been ·"'wl sufficient to point up the importance and complexity of the subject. With sufficient research to develop the fundamental scientific facts, it should be possible to design and operate waste disposal facilities which not only guarantee protection and conservation of marine resourcesJ but also enhance the beneficial uses of these resources by promoting increased productivity in the oc~an~ I believe it would be most prudent and wise for the state and federal regulatory agencies to fund meaningful research projects to intelligently identify existing a.nd potential marine environmental problems rather than enforce policies which require the expenditure of massive amounts of public monies for facilit~es that provide possibly little or no improvements to our environment. LP:gc Enclosures L~:y~?~ Lindsley Parsons Vice President, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project · Commissioner for the Orange CoW1ty Sanitation Districts .. · .• MEASURING SOME OF MAN'S EFFECTS ON THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL MARINE ENVIRONMENT. George E. H~avka Southern California Goastal Water Research Project 1100 Glendon Avenue Los Angeles, California 90024 Prepared for IEEE International. Conference on Engineering in the Ocean Environment September 21-23, 1971 Extensive attention has recently been focused on research efforts to achieve pollution abatement and promote environmental enhancement. The success of such efforts depends, in part, on development of the capacity to make required environmental.measure- ments with the desired accuracy, precision, speed, and f~cility and within the available budget. It is hoped that this paper, which describes the activities of the Southern California Coastal. Water Research Project (SCCWRP), will provide an indication of the problems on which research emphasis is currently peing placed. SCCWRP, a relatively new, goal-oriented research effort, has been established to study the southern California coastal water environment, especially with respect. to the effects of wastewater dischar_ges. The Project was started and initially sponsored by five agencies of local government responsible for ·'-11 wastewater disposal· in the regi~n -Ventura County, the Citie,s of San Diego and Los Angeles, and County Sanitation Districts in Orange County and Los Angeles County. A commission, the SCCWRP Authority, was established by the sponsors to assume control of the Project and to be responsible to the public. The initial SCCWRP activities involved an information search in some 17 task areas of physic~l and chemical oceanography, marine biology, public health, and environmental engineering. ·Emphasis was placed on work related to the Southern California Bight, the feature defined by the coastal indentation that stretches from Point Conception 300 miles to Cape Colnett in Baja California, Mexico (Figure 1). An assessment of thermal and organic energy inputs to the Bight was made by Mr. Chen .Young as a part of this -1- initial review. His findings indicate that the energy introduced through municipal wastewater discharge is lpwer by an order of magnitude than that contributed by power plant cooling water. Another substantial SCCWRP review effort has been Dr. Irwin Haydock's analysis and evaluation of 14 years of data on the abundance and diversity of plankton in Santa Monica Bay. The data were collected by personnel of the Hyperion Sewage Treatment Plant, El Segundo,· California. Preliminary findings indicate the existence of an area of enhanced productivity within 5 miles of the Hyperion outfall terminus: fluctuations within the entire Bay, however, appear to be a reflection of larg~r scale phenomena occurring throughout the entire Bight. Other subjects being investigated by SCCWRP as a part of this review include mercury concentration levels, surface and subsurface circulation and water mass characteristics, and fish diseases in the. Southern California Bight. The active research phase of the SCCWRP program is being developed from information collected and evaluated during the review. Several programs have already been initiated: these involve an inventory of waste inputs and distributions in the Bight and an attempt to establish quantitative biological indices of waste effects. These programs will be discussed below. INVENTORY Several of the SCCWRP studies currently underway are designed to assess and quantify the introduction and distribution of trace and other constituents entering southern California coastal waters. -2- ,.... Neutron Activation Analysis of Trace Elements . '-11 In addition to studies specifically addressed to a particular input mode or Bight reservoir, SCCWRP has established the analytical capacity to measure heavy metals in various types of samples. Throughout the next yea·r, · the SCCWRP heavy metal analysis and intercalibration program will involve the neutron activation analysis {NAA} laeoratory of Dr. Vince Guinn,, Univer- sity of California, Irvine. NAA is an extremely sensitive and quantitative technique, often used as a reference method for the evaluation of other trace element determinations. SCCWRP will supply the samples {fish, invertebrates, sedimen .. t.s; and pos·sibly air particulates} and specify the metals to be analy.zed. It is · estimated that as many as 400 samples can be analyzed for an average of 10 elements within the 1-year period. Storm Water Runoff As part of the SCCWRP overall inventory of waste inputs, a program to measure and analyze storm water runoff to the Southern California Bight has been initiated with the firm of Pomeroy, Johnston and B~iley .. Runoff may constitute an important source of pollutants to the coastal waters. The study will provide the first comprehensive, quantitative indication of the constituents in both the aqueous and suspended sediment phases of southern California river runoff. Five major representative watersheds containing different combinations of rural, urban, industrial, and wilderness· a.reas, will be selecte~ for sampling. The resulting measures of pollu.tant inputs~ the pollutant mass emission rates, will be based on geographical location, season, and waste-generating activity . -3- surf ace Slicks and Floating Particulates Acc~rding to an excellent 1970 report by the Academy of Sciences (NAS) and the Academy of Engineering (NAE), few ·investigators have attempted to sample and analyze the materials actually present .on a water surface. Studies of surface slicks and floating particulates of wastewater origin have been especially scarce. SCCWRP added sampling of the southern California region to an existing Environmental Protection Agency instrllinentation ·development program by collaborating with Dr. R. E. Selleck and Mr. R. Carter, University of California, Berkeley. One objective . of the program is to investigate the extent to which slicks function as an important trans~ort and concentration medium for various chemical and biological species. The first.~ampling effort of the program was conducted -on 7-8 April 197.1 at three sites: directly above the Hyperion 5-mile outfall diffuser, 2 nautical miles down-current from the first station, and in.the lee of Santa Catalina Island. Separate surf ace samples were collected for analysis at each station for film materials; floating particulates; and associated.coliform bacteria, neuston, heavy metals, and chlorinated hydrocarbons. Preliminary results suggest that the survival of colirorm bacteria associated with flouting particulates may differ substantially from that generally reported for coliforms in sea water. On 30 August-! September, 1971 a second sampling was conducted at the same th~ee stations and at an additional location in the vicinity of the Whites Point outfall. Surface samples ·similar to those taken during the first cruise were obtained;. in addition, water samples were collected at all stations at a depth of 10 cm for .V comparison with surface samples. Further comparisons will be made \..,) -4- : "'-" with a 24-hour composite sample of Hyperion effluent obta.ined immediately prior to the sampling cruise. Chemical Analysis of Sediments Marine sediments constitute another important Bight reservoir in which trace constituents may be concentrated. In order to determine the.extent to which this may occur in the immediate vicinity of the outfall pipes, a program.was developed with Dr. James Arnold and Mr. James Galloway, University of California, San Diego. Using atomic absorption spectrometry, . .. .. ·. sediment samples from the vicinity of the Hyperion, Whites Point, Point Loma, old and new Orange County, and Oxnard outfalls were analyzed for concentrations of cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, manganese, nickel, silver, and· zinc. The mercury content of these samples is being investigated by a SCCWRP staff member. Preliminary results in~icate that surface sediment~ in close proximity to several of ~he major sewage outfalls· display metal concentrations significantly elevated with respect to those in deeper and in more distant surface sediments. ·complete findings will .be available this year. SCCWRP has also made use of core {or vertical) sediment samples collected by Mr. Andrew Soutar, Scripps Institution of Oceanography~ from the floor of the anaerobic Santa Barbara Basin. These cores provide a chronology of events occurring in the area and may constitute an accurate and continuous h1storical record of heavy metal concentrations in the California coastal environment. -5- Chemical Analysis. of Organisms To determine the extent to which constituents measured in the inorganic reservoirs of the Bight are reflected in the biota, three common intertidal invertebrates (the mussel, Mytilus calffornianus: the gooseneck barnacle, Pollicipes polymerus, anq the starfish, Pisaster ochraceus) were collected by the SCCWRP staff, led by Dr. David Young, along five lines, up to 100 miles long, conver~J.::.ng on the densely populated Los Angeles are:::. Eleven coastal anC! 6 island stations were sampled. T}J.e o·rganisms selected include. 2 filter~feeders and one carnivore. It was hypothesized that the data obtained would illustrate the presence and magnit~de of any significant concentration gradients. Thousands of heavy meta~ measurements on these organisms were made via emission spectroscopy by Mr. George Alexander, , University of California, Los Angeles. Preliminary results for 15 heavy metals in selected tissues from Mytilus californianus do not show marked radial trends of the type·hypo~hesized above. However, \ihen average concentrations for· the six coastal stations . . in Los Angeles and Orange Counties were compared to averag.es for the six island stations, statistically significant differences were observed: the coastal averages ~xceeded the island averages for approximately half of the metals tested. In general, these differences were slight. Except for lead, which demonstrated a three-fold variation, the· average coastal:island ratio was only 1-.3:1. As part of the SCCWRP investigation of trace constituents in the biota, Mytilus californianus samples were sent to Dr. Robert ·W. Riseb~ough, University of California, Bodega Marine Laboratory, -6- .- for analysis of all identifiable ·chlorinated h~drocarbons. Mytilus tissues from this survey are also being analyzed for ganuna-ray radionuclides, as well as for gross alpha and beta ray radioactivities. These results will be compared to previous concentrations of gamma-emitters in Mytilus samples from the Bight measured by Dr. Young and Dr. T. R. Folsom at Scripps Institution of Oceanography during the last decade. Additional trace-constituent analyses are planned for bottom organisms living close to and distant from the discharges of the sewage outfalls. These organisms include the.dover sole, white croaker, starfish, sea hare, and rock crab. Some collections have already been made. EFFECTS Although the inventory_programs discussed above are valuable in determining the geographical areas and organisms on which research emphasis should be placed, assessment of the ecological significance of wastewater discharges to the ocean should involve considerati.on of the effects of wastewaters on reproduction, growth, and behavior of organisms. Effects on population dynamics and community structure should also be investigated. However, since knowledge in these fields of biology --even in the absence of wastewaters --is virtually nonexistent for many southern California marine organisms, it will be a long time before a truly complete and valid asses?ment is possible. In the meantime, various short- terrn, partially satisfactory investigations are desirable: these can, for example, produce results useful to regulatory agenci~s. -7- External Diseases in Fish SCCWRP has initiated an investigation of external diseases reported in fish co·11ected from southern California waters. Emphasis is being placed primarily on tumors and fin rot in dover sole and white croaker. This effort has been directed toward (1) compiling available information on the incidence, ~ature, and possible causes of these anomalies as compared with similar occurrences in northern California, Oregon, Washington,_ British Columbia, and Alaska; and (2) coordinating trawling surveys and fishery biology studies. Meetings have been held with staff members of sanitation agencies and with interested ·in"ciividuals from local universities to consolidate previous~y collec~ed fishing data, improve collection methods and information pro- < . cessing, and provide a better channel for conununications. Because descriptive terminology for these types of diseases has not been uniformly employed, one of the first objectives of this program ~as to establish a st~ndard set of descriptiye terms and a standard format sheet for future fish· collections. To further coordinate survey programs, trawling methodologies (~. g., ·speed, time·, depth, eq~ipment) were compared and. sarnpl~ng procedures and specimens of interest (e. g., for heavy metal and chlorinated hydrocarbon analysis) we·re defined. Skeletal Deformities and Asynunetry in Fish No-entirely satisfactory index of environmental health currently exists either for the southern California area or for the coastal zone as a whole. According to theNAS-NAE report,· there is a critical need for accurate·: and simple methods of assessing the general condition of the biota. Dr. Michael ~ Soule and Mr. David Valentine, University.of California,. San.· Diego, are conducting a research prog·ram to establish developmental ·asymmetry in fish as an environmental health index. Preserved specimens of the sand bass Paralabrax nebulifer, in which deformities -8- have been observed, are presently being analyzed for age and sex differences, and these parameters will be tested for correlation with deformities (such as asynunetry of ventral fins, gill rakers, opercula, and snout). Grunion, white croaker, and kelp bass will also be collected and examined for deformities. Attempts to induce asymmetry py exposing specimens of the Japanese rice fish, Oryzias latipes, to various concentrations of lead and/or DDT in the labo~a tory have revealed a possible synergistic effect between the two pollutants. Biostimulation and Eutrophication Stimulation or inhibition of primary productivity in a marine environment (i.e., of·phytoplankton) may provide another index of wastewater effects. Phytoplankton are immediately affected by environmental changes and therefore may constitute an extremely sensitive indicator of pollution. A program to ptudy· phytoplankton populations in the vicinity of southern California wastewater outfalls both during and in the absence of upwelling (which causes a natural introduction of nutrients into surface waters) is being c~nducted by Dr. William Thomas, University of California, San Diego. In addition to field determinations of 14 c-uptake and chlorophyll concentration, receiving water samples will be tested on laboratory strains o~ dominant southern California phytoplankton species, and various enrichment mixtures (e.g., Point Lorna outfall effluent and combinations of selected nut+ients) will be tested on natural phytoplankton popuiaLions. Two cruises have been conducted to date. On the second cruise, ·Mr. Thor Willsrud, Ventura College, investigated plankton species diversity and volume -9- 14 (in contrast to the chlorophyll and c-uptake data of Dr. Thomas) with two types of collecti"on equipment, plan~ton bottles and nets. The nets used were similar to the .Hyperion net employed in 'the 14- year collection.of data in Santa Monica Bay mentioned above. Correlation bf all these parameters is important because net collections consistently miss the smaller organisms. Stress·and Re.covery of a Benthic Community Investigation of the structure and dynamies of a biological community may also· provide an index of environmental health. The NAS-NAE report suggests that the best plan would include a thorough prewaste discharge comparison of a disposal site with a similar reference area and adequate continuing obser- vation of both after disposal began. Such a plan was incorporated into the program being conducted.by Dr. E.W. Fager and Mr. Gary Smith, University of California; San Diego. This study was one of the first initiated in association with SCCWRP to take advantage of the unique opportunity to study stress and recovery effects at .the new and old Orange County outfalls following the ef~luent switch in April 1971. Prei'iminary findings {as of 24 June 1971) reveal that, although hydrogen sulfide and organic· carbon levels had dropped in the sediments surrounding the old outfall, no biological effects were yet apparent at either outfall area. Data collected during the second cruise conducted 30 August 1971 are currently being analyzed. CONCLUDING REMARKS While SCCWRP will make contributions to the long-range environmental program that must be accomplished, its principal -10- efforts are directed at achieving a maximum of usable results by October 1972, the close of the Joint Powers Agreement creating the Project. One such class of short-term efforts includes the chemical inventory; the heavy metal analyses of sediment samples and intertidal organisms will be published by the end of this year. Although this work will not provide the desired index. of ecological impact, such chemical and physical measurements can serve as indicators of the extent and nature of marine pollution. These results should be of value to regulatory and monitor~ng agencies. Determination of the ecological significance of waste- . water effects depends on an investigation of the reproduction, growth, and behavior of organisms and of the subsequent .changes in population dynamics and community structure that occur in. relation to natural and man-induced phenomena. LITERATURE CITED National Academy of Sciences -National Academy of Engineering. 1970. Wastes_ Management Concepts for the Coastal Zone- Requirements for Research and Investigation. Washington, D. C. 126 p. -11- 124° 34° 3 cj 124° ( 122° \ ) \ ' " ' \ \ \~ I '-. ~, THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BGHT 0-200 Meter Depth r-....... _,. 3000 Meter Depth \ \ \ \ \ 8 Municipal Wastewater Ou"tfal Is 0 40 I I I Kilometers 100 I 122° \ \ 120° ( \ ,. ' '\ 1.200 \ \ \ ' ' Barbara . ' / ' I , _____ ....... . \ 'l '--.......... ,) ~ '-""' l='1gure 1,-Major municipal wastewater outfalls 1n the Southern Californic Bicht. 116°( Bay Pedro Bay Newport Beach 32° 30° 116° October 22, 1971 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 Attached herewith is a copy of the report prepared by the Project Director of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project and discussed by Director Parsons at the regular October Joint Board meeting. .· ·= .. .. •. ·, . ·1',edera,l Regi.stcr, Tuesday, July 13th -· Regulation under Title J.8,, ChapteT 5, Scct:Lon 601.25~ (b) No grant shall be ma.de for ·any ·project unless the applic~t provides assu:ca.nce ·satisfactory to the Adr:1inistrator that the proposed treatreent works, 9r part thereof, will adequately treat· sewage or ·industrial wistes of·a liq~id · ' natute in.order to abate, control or prevent water.pollution~ No sue)) assurB.nce \·til?-be. satisfactory unless it includes . . assurance that the treatment works or par~ the~eof is con- :.st~ucte~, ?Perated and maintained in accordance with plans, desj_gn, and" specifj catj_o:.1s 1{r::i.ch \·lill ~estli t in: .• 1·. Substantially c~;r,pJ.cte rercoval o~ all ,, float~blc and settlcable · 1r.aterj.als; 2. Remo.val .~r ·not less than 85~~ of five..,.da::' )?ioc}?.emical oxSrgcn d erna.nd; · '_ 3._ Substantially complete reduction of pa~hogenic ~~cro-organis~s; and .·4. Such additional tre~tment as may be necessary to meet applicable water· quality standards, reco~~l'"11Gnde.tim1s of .the Administrator or ·order bf the court pursuant t6 Section 10 of the Federal Act; provided that in the case of a pro~ jcct \·1hich ·".·:ill d:Ln~~bJ.x·~c wr:..ste into open ocean Haters through an ocean outfall ~- . . .. . · . . ·. ments of Sub-paragraph 2 of this . . paragraph i~ he dete~mines that such discharges will not adversely.affect the open o.cean env:L~onmcnt and adjacent. shores; provj_ded further that i'.!1 the case of a· project design~~ sqle~y to treat o.r control wet weather combined . . se\·1er overflm·rs the Adrnin~str.atqx· may waive the reoui:ccrr1ents of Sub-paragraphs ,.L • • • • .. · 2 and 3 if he finds such proje~t to be consistent with river bas~n and region~l or metrop_oJ.itan pl&.ns to meet approved · :·· w.ater quality st~ndards. · Dated:· July 8> 1971 . . . . , (signed). H~lliam D. Huckelshaus . · Administrator · .. · . . . . . . Environmental Protection Ar:;enc:r •. #3 -Conrad Hohener presented material -report more broad in scope than just checking out material in letter . A R-1 density was figured in master plan flows -this area contains lot of undeveloped land presently outside District . 2,800 acres included in mas t er p l an study that lie outs i de present District boundaries . Within District boundaries some 8 1 3 inside District boundaries. For most part figures R-1 residential -to increase to R-2 density -this was problem considered by the engineers . Establish criteria for M~~K.Qll~ upgrading dea sity -total expenditure $740 ,000 i f area. outside the District plus f or 1 8 acres in the District were increased in land use from R-1 to R-4 . R-2 does not pay it own way by increased connection charge. Clifton Miller -How MK~ many acres wou l d use a ll capacity Hoh 960 would use all capacity and 2800 outside the District , if 8 1 3 inside develops as planned would only have capacity for 960 acres outside District with this increased density (R -1 to iX R-2)-This would use capacity origi nally sche duled for 2800 acres outside District. Mi ller -Brief l y recapped prob lem for Wade Herri n s i nce he was out of town for some time prior to meeting and since he is an alternate director - Smith -bond money should be used for master plan faci l ity construction - Tiday -Attorney for estate introduced Hewett a l so an XXX attorney for estate and Evans, eng ineer -make a coup l e of points 1 . Property was in District for approximately 1 0 y ears and paid i ts a hare for 1 0 y ears -altho ugh i t was taken out of Distri ct it sti l l has taxes from bond i ssue .on tax stateme nt and back taxes wou l d be paid 2 . Re port of Evans indi ca te that the lines ~ do have capacity -project wil l not use as much capacity as R-1 density -no c h ildren, many retired people - people travel a good deal of time, etc. thi s ty pe of project does not discharge as much to system as R-1 s i nce these are cond ominimum type deve l op~ent . Origi nal master p l an anticipated greater effluent d i scharge then would come from thi s type of de v elopment . On l y thing wai t ing on this estate is approval from sanitation districts . Rogers -Can we have e v aluation on statement that this type o f development generates less flow? Hohener -Has not seen letter reported on, cannot comment Herrin -Can we adjourne this until after regul ar meeting? FAR gave MM Miller copy of document referred to when attorney stated had tentative approv al of board . Rogers -~K~e Move for reconsideration Seconded Vote : 4 opposed -2 in favor Motion failed JOINT #6 -Ad opt resol ution on part time inspec t ors #8 -FAH -new ~~~ proposed requirements for discharge to the ocean -Ask HRH tell you what this would M~K mean to the Districts HHH -Notice of public h earing on state po licy for water control Hearings Novemb er 18 and December 2 -the state is setting t h ese requirements to me et federal requi rement s requiring 85% BOD removal -State offe r ing this instead of federal ~X:X~fil'!«X~H requirements -State policy is more re strict i ve than wh at federal requirements are -Water Qu ality objectives set out -pages 9 and 10 requirements can no t be met with present X~KX treatment -Page 11 toxicity ~~«X~XPl:X requirements - It will cost additional $35 million to build treatment f acili ties necessary to treat waste and the n almost t wice as much to operate required XXMIXIXX:Xernl fac ilities . Have b een working with regional board to set requirements t hat coul d b e met . Lee Fischer -toxicity specialist repo rted on what we c a n discharge and still h a v e no problem ~ -would water sav ing devices chang e the b alance on our counts of toxicity? Fischer -Ye s, definately Miller -E£11XXXHX~~~~~X:X:XfiliXX Noticed in repo rt they say 50% survival -of what? F ischer -sample Fish HRH -Po licy go into effect January meeting of 1 972 . Co s t to the District -if we ask for a postponement we get into question of financing . Today there is 80% availab le to meet requirements . This is for t h ree years . -XXXM~~file If we are going to h a ve to build these facilittes better to do so when we can get federal financing . M Just -We have one month (one more meet ing) before next he aring . Miller - fee l s that would h a ve De lay -would like explanation of b ar ~~~~M.X grap h - this sould b e released to the news med ia that t axpayer s X$ increase without me asurable profits r JWS -This bar graph reflects the cost assuming no funding state or feds -if funds become available could reduce amount - anticipating that we would apply for ~~~~~2LM progress payments if we had a grant awarded -we would expend $16 million before we could get progress payment from t h e state Wedaa -Could a l l this be prepared in a written statementXK~~ form available for next meeting? JWS -yes it will be -.. - I Parsons -Fee l s that we do not no what is necessary to clean up ocean Newport Beach resolution re SCCWRP sample of MXHX wh at we may want to do -Feels that we should ~X ask t h em to h old off unt il we find out what we are doing to ocean Wedaa -When this is over will we h a ve enough base our opinions on? Parsons -we are h eading in this direction Mille r -With respect to artic l e on this -in En gineering News record ~ -No one knows or h as shown out t h ese ~~~MI:xiiMXM requirements could actually be mes technically -could we get grants for activate sludge if they want phy sical HHH -Could not get answer on this Culver -Who initiated SCCWRP Parsons -Supp orting agencies, EKXSK!fi:XE LA County, LA City, San Diego, ....tts \1~ ..+ · • c "> r (.) '- ' FAH -Undersaand fe a eral government is estab lish ing three y ear program Mi l ler -Wou l d like information to be used for each Directors ask counc i l t o s e nd to State~ water Resources Control Board iust -Ha v e to make appearance at h earings, e t c. Miller -Would lik e to have specific tax rates #13 -What have we tol d Ch ino Water District -FAH -h ad meeting with t h em -Board h as given their managemem t authority to proceed a #26 -~~~IHlmsl~~§ID~~ District 5 directors lilifill.DIM huddled in corner with engineers -whatever happened was moved and seconded 35A -State indicates t h at t h eir funds become a v ailalb e in December -work to b e done by summer of 1 972 . Possible resc heduling of eigh er state project or sanit ation district project so t h at street would not be X~~ torn up for summer traffic and permanent expensive structures and fixtures (medians, e t c.) would not be put in then torn out -NB representatives will contact Joe De v lin re this problem •, -'---. • OCTOBER 13 REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager reported that final approval had been received from the Environmental Protection Agency for a combined state and federal grant in ~e amount of $10,032 ,000 , for ~ 1970-7 1 projects . The last contrac~ for said projects -wa-s ~ ~ awarded by District No . 1 on September 30th. Mr . Harper stated that pursuant to previous direction of investigated the Boards, the staff had X~K~IDCXID{~ reports of substandard quality water purportedly being discharged into the Santa Ana River by upstream agencies . The Santa Ana River Basin Regional Water Quality Control Board is ~&ently-studying tbg matte-r in an attempt to develop a program to improve ""(A..,. the quality of discharges to the river ~ and the Regional n.ee:1 d Ls outlined ten ta.ti ve solutions to-the p.r:oblem in their a.---11Interim Water Quality Management Plan ". The staff reviewed the Districts' activities in connection with control of od~rs '- and reported on a meeting held with residents in ;the v ic~ni ty ~ aJr.-~ -f..r ( ~ ~ .. -&,, f"- of ~ge±am-ation Plant No . 1 to discuss 't.Ae-o4e? co6L1ul p1oblem.. The meeting wasf very constructive and a program was developed ~ .Q_ with the residents'participat~on in identifying some of the .p..r.ablems that arise in this T€gard . Mr . Harper reported on the annual Water Pol lution Control Federation conferenceheld in San Francisco this month . Th e meetings 'wa-s extremely bene fi cial to the ~ a a:-1 Ult ~ mem0e..rs and k,ey staff me~~s.. tl:lat were able to attend the meeting which emphasized environmental problems and solutions. ... ' • #9 -Fol l owing a brief report by Director Parsons which • a.: a brief report concer ing t h e Districts ction with water savin devices, during -4 •' I • L.. .. I .. :4 ,. I • --I .. . .. • ~ I - ~·· .. r " . ... -.Ill J"l ~I I °i _JJ -I I !(Ul I .. . ... ~ I ....-61 1:-c.cc~ _J • -... I l I zsft .. -. II • -~ I ·. r I •! •: ; I 4 ' I . I 4 ~ .. ...... -· • . .. :~f .. Ii,., ... ·~ -. • .. • , ._ I I - C° I .. .. 1 ~ -I I ~ .-. • '• · . .. r0gram incorporating would result unty taxpayers -T --., ·: • .... ~ • II r -;)_- it was mov ed, seconded and duly carried : That the staff be ~ I r1 ~ -a... pt/. ~ authorized to proceed with :i'o:r=mat4on of ~Jptogram of water conservation based on amendment to restri ctive building codes to allow use of water saving plumbing devices . 11 -Report of Special Committee for Studying Directors Fees -Director Finne l l , Ch airman of the R~~~XII Special --Committeef for Studying Directors Fees, stat~d that his ... ·~~~- committee had received the informationttrom the General Counsel in connection with the special committee 's assignment and that a recommendation would be forthcoming at the November 10th joint board meeting . #14 -Report re proposed new state policy on ocean discharge reported that he and the Districts ' consulting design engineer for treatment plant facilities had had the opportunity to meet with representatives of the State Water Resources Control Bo ard in connection with proposed new state policy on ocean d i scharge_dl:H'ing tbe annnal wat.er pallutior=t c~l ;fede.r~nfe1 ence meeting-in &a-n-R>anei-sco XlilK earlier tms n~11Ltr. The proposed policy would reeyttire phJi ~ical -eil:v ~'Wotr.ld require a substantial i,I;1.QPea"e in cost tf1-~~6 - ~ taxpayers of Or~n~ County as we_ll crs thr9ughout tne ~~st /J o_i J'At~~ -""a ~ Cn4 , .. . ~~ I ( I -Cct ~' ld:c,, 1td '' :j).r Ci? of the state)~ One of the steiibs ~concerns is that t'he state NP' ~ f1-<-"' , -tt. 1 ·c~ board is attempting to solve a~problem1they'have not yet defined#-arn:r"(":Be..;r proEosed ~o lic y may result in regulatory I bodies dictating design of facilities as well as ~ di s charge requirements . Preliminary cost studies by the staff . ct • t +~ ~ -tJ,v._ in ica e ~ the Districts tax rate wo uld "approB:imately ,MA.,-C .. t C'1 improvement doubleAto fill1d the capital ~~Mv~M~v . .oZU.lU.{i£S..rLJI< requirements ' -::t ~ .. ~, a.ad result i n an on-going i n c re ase for aperetion c o s t s. Mr . Harper reported that tRe %tate foorrd ha:o oehoauled ~~j L n Ll~e.. ~ hearings on this matter~and t h at a more detailed report t.e the boardw 1mtil"d. -be made the General Manager reported t h at the Districts had submitted .--\1.1. ~·J.....-. a proposal to the state reque sti ng ~~ eonsidation fop a demonstration grant for research to be K~IDCE~NX conducted with the experimental sedimentation basin presently under c onstruction by the Districts. #17 -Director Miller, EXX Chairman of District No . 7, reported t h at during recent meetings of th&-D:i-st ri ct Board ·r, w ;:t:J...e_, df/... l1 (J ,.... }- considerable attention had been given to the responsi~ilit y --s£ thQ BoaF-4 in connection with proposed annexation$i;.e-ttre Jli,.s..t~t o t ~reas in wh ich the proposed de v elopment of the land ¥Ould provide for a population density XNXllrnX~N much {)/ ,. . . I greater than t h ose ~4Tr'~-a.ti on of t h e .,;gi:s LI le ts master p l an . Ip J;-~~s otho re %1milar Districts have similar problems, it was ,w.atteH' b y It was pointed out that in ~ddit_7~~,.~~e problem of territo::y ol\~side the Distric U.~problem X~.IKii also t. . <. < -t-' '-(;\-\ " 'f.G.p-areas inside t h e Dis t ric t for wh ich zoning plans and }fh-.t t.t ' e.... l '-~· . ._ ._, densit' ttoc~ in the preparation of master plan reports being chang ed to allow muc h g reater population density '1Ildi vidual t h an originally es t ablisheCJ.t XN«~:K~KU District master are based on the land use~ plans of the County of Orange and t h e seve r a l cities within t h e D istric ~and f a c ili t ies d e sig ned are b as e d upon flows t hat would b e g ene rate d -'~ ... . I by deve lopment of those plans. A general discussion centered a round t h e boards respon9ibility -b _,_ fa" for prov iding services for territory outside District'and XN J the financing of f a cilit ies required to h andle the increasing flows ~~MernK~~ generated by the h i gher densities . It was the concensus of the Bo ard that County and ~s pl"::'J.;nfo c{}~.;'.~i;ons sould ~ e tlteir ~lt ies ~to determ-in€ if adequate K~M~KK sewerage MXK~lfiliX disposal capaciti~ is a v ailable ~~X« before approving ~~~II{ zonj ng changes/""' 'lr'"' s \. / #2 3 -Dire ctorf Pai£ CoHl1R iBsiel."l&tei50 SOOWRP, reported tJ... r(I (1-..._~l...,,~ I...._ S C:ft'• p fl briefly on /p~ieMion ef t:Rat a@iol:l.cy enti tleS:' "Measuring Some of Marls Effects on Southern Ca lifornia Co as tal Marine Environment" and state d that copier wou ld b e made available for all Di re ctors . I " #29 -Following a /discussion in connectionwith t he proposal of Ch ino EKKD{K* Basin Municipal Water Distriztto participate .. I' II I I l L ~ ~ ' ~ ' ' .I' ,..... .( , 1 \.A r:v-.... '.) in the S1mta Ana River Interc ep t or~ it was moved , seconded and duly carried: That t h e letter , from Ch i n~ B a~iP Mun icipal v... ~ • ;L....,:., <..u-Jl, Water District dated T'e"1 joint us e of ~anitation ~istrict facilitCAs be rece i v ed and ordered filed and, Futher moved :~:at the sLaff 'oe aaL h ori-zed te-ne-go t±a t e a ....c_o nt r a.ct mu st-be drafted pri-0r to De cember 1, -1971. #35 Conrad Hohener of Boyle Engineers, Di stri ct 's design engineers, verball y r epo rted on the proposed alignment for t he Knott Interceptor, Cont ract No . 3 -17 . He stated that the City of Fountain Va lley h ad app roved 2f.MM t h e rou'\ting through the City and that requests for approval 11 II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 5175 of Orange County, California . 10844 ~ms Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 (i) (2) (3) JOINT BOARDS ·. Adjourned Regular Meeting October 27~ 1971 -7:30 p.m. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation Roll Call . DIS TRI CT r-( Consideration of motion to reconvene AGENDA ADJOURNMENrs •• L COMP & MILEAGE.: .... .__ -FILES SET UP ......... ~ ........ ..;. RESOLUTiONS CERTIFIED.I("' LETTERS WRIITEN ........... .. MINUTES WRITIEN ......... _ .MINUTES FILED ............. _ ( 4) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern_, _if neeessal?Y e,b\t\n :fl:-/ (5) ALL DISTRICTS Convene in Executive .Session to consider personnel matte'rs ~ ALL DISTRICTS ~ Reconvene in regular session 9·, 1.\3 (7) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of actions re personnel matters considered in executive session (s0 ALL DISTRICTS Q Discussion re proposed new state policy regarding discharge . of wastewater to the ocean. {Se~ materi~l in meeting~ .. folders.) (9) \y:\\~Y a~"· /.'. (10) (11) (12) ~ (14) (15) ALL DISTRICTS . I Consideration of motion authorizing advertising for bids AA · on Area Lighting for Administration Building Parking /'\ ~ . Facilities., Job N"o. Pl-12.:.5~ and authorizing the General Manager to award contract tolowest responsible bidder for an amount not to exc~ed $2,500 ALL DIST TS \ ~ ... ·Other busx ess an? co~icatio~ if any DISTRICT 1 :\..~ Other business ~comm~at:io~, if any DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn I 0-'~·(, DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn I O~l/ DISTRICT 3 "'"" . Other business ~d ~uni~tionsA.\"f any (16) DISTHICT 3 Consideration o:f motion to adjourn (17) DISTRICT 7 . Considerat.ion o:f Hesolution No4 71-133-7, to receive· v~ \ca \ ~~e,~ and file bid tabulation and reconunendation, and i,...e. / awarding contract for Redhill Interceptor,. Reaches AA Jc 6, 7 & 8, Contract No •. ·r-6-4 to Northern Contracting 'r' d' Cow~ifny, in the amount of $486,108.70. See pages 11 A11 and (18) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 71-135-7~· authorizing ) ~v acceptance of Grant of Easement from Angie Rados, IVJ S \.,~ in 11 ~~nnection with West Trunk Sewer. · See page \-.. \ ~ (19) DISTRICT 7 . . ·consideration of Resolution No. 71-13~-7, authorizing ,· ~~e>'"""execution of easement to occupy surface rights, to vf.. Angie Rados, upon receipt of sani ta.ry sewer easement. See page "D" · . ·. (20) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving reimbursement , ~~~e..Y agreement with C. J. Segerstrom and Sons in the amount ~ v. o:f $44_,064.12 for Plaza Drive Subtrunk Sewer, as ~;le previously authorized by· .. the .. Boa.rd · (21) DISTRICT 7 . . ~ () ~ ~.J Consideration of offer on behalf of Frank Mead to '''~ . I ")~ ~ pay the difference in.cost of ~versizing portion .of the 1A S _) ~.., JJ sewer proposed to be included in Assessment District r 1 1...,1 -y No. 9. See. pa.ge "E" .. . . · (22) DI. TRICT ~ · . Ot er busi~s and~mmuni~ons,~ a~ (23) DISTRICT 7 Q Consideration of motion to adjourn /O .. ' ~ I < 24 ) D~~;c~Jllnes~and \ollllllun~tion~ if b \ (25) DISTRICT 11 Consideration o:f motion to adjourn lO~ 3 0 ~-DISTRICTS 5 & 6 .. \___:_) Discussion of participation in cost of Pacific Coast J Highway Sewer Crossing with Donald J. Stoltz and Company M S (27) (28) (29) DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Consideration of motion authorizing inclusion of parallel sewer work in Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-19 DISTRICT Other bus ness ~cOJJllllun\_catits, {f ~ . DISTHICT 6 · ~ ,- Consideration of motion to adjourn f 0, 3 l;) ~2- ~\s NI }s N1 ,. ~ (30) (31) (32) (33) (34) (35) DISTRICT 5 . . Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2, to the plans and specifications for Sewer Trunk 11 B11 , Unit 7, Upper New~ort Bay Crossing, Contract No. 5-18, authorizing an addition of' $1,728000, ·to the contract with Zurn Engineers. See page "F" DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3, to the plans and specifications for Sewer Trunk 11 B11 , Unit 7, Upper Newport Bay Crossing, Contract No. 5-18, authorizing an addition of 62 calendar days to the contract with Zurn Engineers. See page 11 G11 DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4, . to the plans and specifications· for Sewer Trunk "B", Unit 7, Upper Newport Bay Crossing, Contract No. 5-18, autho~izing a deduction of $17,000.00, from the contract with Zurn Engineers. See page "H" · ~ . DISTRICT 5 . Consideration of Resolution No. 71-136-5, approving and authorizing execution of a Final Closeout Agreement with Zurn Engineers relative to Sewer Trunk "B 11 , Unit 7, Upper Newport Bay Crossing, Contract -No. 5-18. See pa.ge 11 1 11 DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if· any DISTRICT 5 business and communications C.onsideration of motion to receive and file letter dated October 22, 1971, from Shuinnan- Simpson, relative to Pacific.Coast HighwaYs Force Main, Trunk B, Unit 8. See page 1J 11 Ml s (36) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn ii ; 5 (i,,. \ Q; y 3 -3- RESOLUTION NO. 71-133-7· AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 7-6-4 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR REDHILL INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 6, 7 & 8, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-4 * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND. ORDER:· Section 1. That the written recommendation ·this day submitted to the Board of Directo~s by Boyle Engineering, District's engineers, and concurred in by the District's Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to Northern Contracting Company, · .Contractor, for REDHILL INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 6, 7, & 8, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-4, and the proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for said Contract No. 7-6-4, .be awarded to Northern Contracting Company, Contractor, in the total amount of $486,108.70, in accordance with the terms of their bid. and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting on October 27, 1971. Agenda Item #17 -A-District 7 BID TABULATION SH E'E T Da. te _.....Ow.ic....it~o-..b~e-..r__...l 9,..._1 _1"-::9~7 .... 1 __ Contract For: RED HILL INTERCEPTOR REACHES 6, 7 & 8 CONTRACT NO. 7-6-4 (Continued) CONTRACTOR 11. Hood Corporation 8201 South Sorensen Whittier, California 90607 12. · Scott Brothers Construction, Inc. 630 South Hathaway Santa Ana, California 92705 13. Salata-Zurn 7891 Cerritos Avenue Stanton, Caiifornia 90680 14. Merco Construction Engineering, Inc. 1704 Ruxton Lane Redondo Beach, California 90278 15. Ernest E. Pestana, Inc. 2225 Old Oakland Highway San Jos~, California 95131 16. Mike Masanovich Construction Co., Inc. 63 Alta Street · Arcadia, California 91006 · 1 7. N. A. Artukovich & Son, Inc. 723 Union Street Montebello, California 90640 18. J. F. Shea Company, Inc. ·655 Brea Canyon Walnut, California 91789 . 19. Burdick Contracting, Inc. P. O. Box 99180 .San Diego, California 92109 20. Dan J. Peterson Company P. O. Box 749 Arcadia, California 91006 21. Steve Kral Corporation P. 0. Box 190 Baldwin Park, California 9170~ .. A~enda Item ·#17 B-1 TOTAL .BID $631,781.50 $632,18:z.oo $654,901.00 $678,948;00 $684,710.00 ·$711, 793. 20 $719,794.oo $724,470.00 $738,660.00 .. · $764,408.00 District 7 Engineer's Estim?te $577,845. BID TABULATION SHEET Contract For: BED HILL INTERCEPTOR REAC.HES 6, 7 & 8 CONTRACT NO. 7-6-4 1. CONTRACTOR Northern Contracting Company P. O. Box 888 Newbury Park, California 2. Anro Construction Company 2215 Lee Avenue . South. El Monte, California 91733 3. Vella & Cappello, A Joint Venture 925 West Fifth Street San Dimas, California 91771 4. Steve Bubalo Construction Company P. O. Box 1067 Reseda, California 91335 5. Charles L. Burch & Sons, Inc. 2491 North Chico Avenue South El Monte, California 91733 6. George Miller Construction ·company 3032 Bandini Boulevard Los· Angeles, California 90023 7. Power Construction 10644 Sable Avenue Sunland, California 91040 8. Chivas Construction 12323~ Woodruff Avenue Downey, California 90242 9. Sully Miller.contracting Company 3000 East South Street Long Beach, California 90805 lQ 0 KEC Company P. O. Box 1338 Hawaiian Gardens, California 90716 * Revised.due to Arithmet~c error -· -. • Agenda Item 1117 . B-2 Date October 19 ," l971 11:00 A.M. TOTAL ·BID . $486' 108. 70* .$517' 850. 67* .$538, lJ.6.9,.e..l,. o~o~-- $570,438.00 ~581,742.20 $583,582.69 $ 5 86 , 25 5 . 00 . $608,426.00 I' $622,318.00 District 7_ r L r-- RESOLUTION NOo 71-135":""7- AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT PHOM ANGIE RADOS A RESOLurION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITA~ION DISTRICT NOo 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY; CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM .ANGIE RADOS * * * * * * * * * ·* r The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE_, DETERMI1~ AND ORDER: Secti.on 1. That certain GrBtnt of Easement dated wherein an easement for sanitary sewer purpose~ is granted to County Sanitation District No. 7 , is hereby accepted from ·Angie Rados; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said. easement is granted is more particularly described and shown.on.Exh:i.:bits 11 A~1 and "B 11 , attached heret~ and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said easement is granted in· conne·ction with West Trunk Sewer, and reciprocal Easement to Occupy Surface Rights; and, ·section 4. · That said easement is accepte~ at no cost to the District; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the .Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 , be authorized and directed to record said Grant of ·Easement in the Official-Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held October 27, 1971. Agenda Item 18 -C-District 7 ·. RESOLUTION NO. ·71-134~7 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF EASEMENT TO . OCCUPY .SURFACE RIGHTS, TO ANGIE RADOS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DIS~RICT NOo 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF EASEMENT TO .·occupy SURFACE RIGHTS; .TO ANGIE RADOS * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of Co:unty Sanitation District No. 7~ of Orange ~ounty, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section l. That the certain Easement to Occupy Surface Rights, wherein County Sanitation ·nistrict No. 7, grants to Angie Rados the right to occupy surface of sanitary sewer easements, i·s hereby approved and ac.cepted; and, Section 2. That this Easement to Occupy Surface Rights, be executed only after receipt of sanitary sewer easement relative to West·Trunk Sewer; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said easement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held October 27, 1971. Agenda Item #19 -D-District 7 \w/. 1. Board of Directors H. LAWSON MEAD Attorney at Law 2014 N. Broadway Santa Ana, California County Sanitation bistrict #7 of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708. Re: Assessment District No. 9 Gentlemen: October 26~ 1971 ~ I have been informed that there has been some concern over Assessment District No. 9 paying for the extra sizing of the ·1ast 300 to 400 feet of line. It is anticipated that, on an interim basis, certain properties easterly of the assessment district may have to pump their effluent over the top of the El Modena grade.through the assessment district line. It was ther~fore decided that in order '-11 to avoid the necessity of paralleling the last few hundred feet of the assessment district line it would be good planning to make that line 10 inches at this time rather than 8 inches. The property most concerned is the approximately.12Q acres belonging to Mead Ranches,· which is presently applying for annexation to Sanitation Di?trict No. 7 as well as to the City of Orange. Frank F. Mead, Nan F. Curran and Lolita Mahoney, who are doing business as Mead Ranches, will therefore pay for any additional costs that may be incurred as a result of installing a 10 inch line rather than an 8 inch line for the last 300 to 400 feet of the assessment district line. A depos~t to cover this cost will be made upon yo~r request. Very truly yours, +J. J1 0utt\'-V\l'wiL_ H. Lawson Mead HLM:cp .. · (. Agenda Item #21 -E-District t ,· r·· COUNTY SANITATION DISTRIC'I1S OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C .0. NO. 2 ------ CONTRACTOR: ZURN ENGINEERS DATE: October 13, ·1971 JOB: SEWER TRUNK "B", UNIT 7, UPPER NEWPORT BAY CROSSING, CONTRACT NO. 5-18 Amourit .of thi~ change .or~er (ADD) ~) $1, 728. 00 \..,I In accordance with contract provisions_, the following changes in the · contract _and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Re: Contractor's letter to the· District dated 27 September 1971 The Contractor was required to reschedule ari early morning operation to tie in the new 33-inch force main to the existing force _main during low 'flows in the system. Contractor sustained additional cost due to this rescheduling because· the initially scheduled tie-in could not be accom- plished due to the failure of Distric~ operations to completely shut _off a valve and th~reby allowing a successful tie-in. It was mutually-agreed that the additional cost to the Contractor shall be a lump sum in the amount of $1,728.00. · Board Authorization date: SHUIRMAN-SIMP~ON By ------------------------- Agenda Item ://30 TOTAL ADD -$1,728.00 Original Contract Price $336,400.00 $ '6,445.00 Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD) ~~ $ 1,728.00 Amended Contract Price " $344,573.00 -111 .... Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By -/s/ Paul· G. Brown Chief Engineer ZURN ENGINEERS By ------------- District 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. .. ----~~~------ CONTRACTOR: ZURN ENGINEERS ~-----....-...---=--=--~~--~~~~-------DATE: October 13, 1971 JOB: SEWER TRUNK "B'', .UNIT 7, UPPER NEWPORT BAY CROSSING, CONTRACT NO. 5-18 Amourit of this change order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ _____ _ ~ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following addit~ons ·to or deductions from the contract P.rice are hereby approved. · Re: Discussion with ·contractor, General Counsel and District Starr. 5 October 1971 The Contractor is hereby granted a 62 day time extension due to the failure of the District to obtain the necessary permits and permissions from the Corps of Engineers, State Water Quality Control Eoard and· the Board of Superv.isors, thu·s prohibiting the Contractor from having access to the work site. · - SUMMARY: Original· Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date. Time Extension C.O. #1 Time Extension .C.O. #3 Revised Completion Date Board authorization date: . SHUIRMAN-SIMPSON By -------------------------~-- Agenda Item #31 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION 62 Calendar days December 9, 1970 210 calendar days July 7, 1971 21 c·alendar days 62 calendar days .September 28, 1971. Origlri~l·Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD). ( DE])UCT) Amended Contract Price $ 336,400.00 $ 8, 173 .-oo $ -0- $ 344,573.00 Approved: . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer ZURN ENGINEERS By ~---------------------------------- -G-Distri:ct 5 COUNTY SANITA'.rION DISTRICTS. OF OR.AI;GE COUNTY ·p. o. BOX 51?5 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 · CHANGE ORDER . .. ·c.o. No. --~---~----------- CONTR4CTOR: .zllB. ...... N_E.._N ...... G ....... I ..... N ...... E ..... E.....,R ..... S _________ _ DATE: October 13, 1971 JOB: SEW~R TRUNK "B", .UNIT 7, UPPER NEWPORT BAY C~OSSING, CONTRACT NO. 5-18 Amourit of this chaHge order ·trn~ (DEDUC'r) · . $ 17, oo"o. oo In a·ccordance with contract provisions, the :following changes in 'the contract and/or cont~act work a·re hereby authorized. and as compensation therefor, the following addit~ons to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Re: . Discussion with Co~trabtor, Gen~ral Counsel and District staff 5 Qc tob~r 1971 . . . . ,,. Due to the 9ontractor being u~able to have access to the.work site because · of the delay in the issuance of the necessary permits and permissions, the Contractor was unable to meet his origihal time schedule and that the rental rates for· the construe tiori easement w~r.e greater than wha.t ·was . contemi:>lated at .the time of the award ·of Contract .. It was mutually, agreed that the total.rental to tre paid by the Contractor for the construction. easement shall. be a lump swn amount of.$.17,000.00, this-amount to be deducted from the Contractor's payment. · Board authorization date:· SHUIRMAN-SIMPSON -By. ___ '------------------------- "._,; .; Agenda Ttem ·#32 ~OTAL DEDUCT . $ 17,000.00· -.Original Contract PrLce $336,400.00 $ 8,173.00 Prev. Au th. Change~ · This Change :(orn:IDJ (DEDUCT) $ 17,000.00 Amenqed Contract Price $327,573.00 -H- Approved: . COUN:TY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange ·County, ~alifornia By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer ZURN ENGINEERS By ----------------~------------------- · District 5 RESOLUTION rm. 71-136-5 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF ~.LNAL CLOSEOu·r AGM.t!;M.t!;NT W.LTH ZURN ENGINEERS RE CONTRACT NO. 5-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING. AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT WITH ZURN ENGINEERS RE CONTRACT NO. 5-18 . * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMiNE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated October 15, ·.1971, wherein the District, upon recommendation of its Chief Engineer and General Manager, agree to certain disput_ed changes and modification in the original contract in return for full and final release from the Contractor of all its .claims and demands either known o~ unkno~m arising out of or pertaining to the subject contract; is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned.regular meeting held October 27, 1971. Agenda Item #33 -I-District 5 SHUIRMAN • SIMPSON r~-__ .:J r7~ t ~·~·1· ~--~3 ~~~-··. -~ . .'~~~·~· 'J· c.:::::i r~::::.: ·. CONSULTING CiVIL ENGINEERS Octobe·r 22, 1971 ·sanitation District #5 County of Orang.e 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Paul Brown Subject: P.C.H. Force Main Trunk B Gentlemen: Unit 8 The State Division of Highways proposes to alter the channelization and signalization of Pacific Coast High- way between Tustin Avenue and "The Arches". The work includes removing. and reconstructing. the median islands so as to provide an additional westbound traffic lane, relocation of traffic signals, and restripi~g. The traffic safety funding for their project is expected to be approved jn November, 1971, and advertisement for bids would take place in January, 1972. Construction of.the Force Main is expected to require some removal, relocation, and restriping of these same improvements sometime in October,· 19.72·. Rescheduling of either project would, therefore, create some cost savings to the District. . It does not appear that construction of both the Force Main and the State's project could be completed prior to the increased traffic volumes of ·the summer ot 1972. . . It is anticipated that the City of ·Newport Beach wishes to have the State's project completed as soon as possi~le. The results of any attempts to effect.these potential cost savings will, of course, affect our design.· We would appreciate your comments at you~ earliest con- venience. Very truly yours, NEWPORT CENTER BUILDING 359 Son Miguel Drive Newport Beach. California 92680 (71 4) 644-0563 DHW/lm ... Agenda. Item :/135 -J-Distris..:L.2.. EX CE RPTS FROM THE MI NU TES OF THE REGULAR JOI NT MEE TIN G OF THE i30 P.RD S OF DI P.ECTO RS OF COU NTY SANITAT I ON D I ST~IC~S NOS . lJ 2, 3, 5, 6 , 7 a n d 11, OF OR.i;N GS CO UNTY, CALIFORNI A A regular join t mee t i ng of the Boa rd s of Dire c tors of County San i tation Dis tricts Nos. 1, 2 , 3, 5 , 6, 7, a n 0 11, of Or a nge County, California, was h e l d at the h our of 7:3 0 p.m ., October 13, 1 971 , 19 , 1084 4 Eliis Avenu e , Fountain Valle y, Ca liforn i a . The Cha i r ma n o f t he Joint A ~min~str a t i ve Or gan i zation c alled the Me et i ng to o r der at 7:30 p.c . The roll was calle d an d the S e cretary re po rte ~ a q uoru m present for ea c h Dis t ri c t's Bo a r ~. DISTRICT 5 Adjournmen t * * * * * * * * * Moved, s e c onded and du l y c arried : That this meeting of t he Board of Directors of County Sa nitation Dist rict No. 5 be adjourned t o October 27, 1971 at 7:30 p.m . The Chairman t hen de c lared t he mee t ing so adj ourned a t 1 0 :14 p .m., Oct ober 13, 1 9 71 . STATE OF CALIFORNIAl SS , COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J . WAY NE SYLVEST ER, Sec r etary o f e a c h of the Boar0 s of Dire ctors of County Sani t a t ion D is t ri ~ts Nos . 1, 2, 3, 5 , 6, 7, a n d 11, o f Ora ng e County, Califo rnia, •1 0 hereby ce rtify t hat th e above an d f oregoing to be full, true an 0 c orre ct c o p y of minute e n t ries on mee t in g of sa i rJ Bo a r d s o f Di rec t ors o n t h e 13t h day o f October 19 71 ' IN WI TNESS WHEREOF , I have h ~r e un t~ se t my han n this 13th S-107 ~ay o f October, 1 9 7 1 ar ~s of Di rectors on Di stricts Nos . an d 11 ...._,. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, fOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF·RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) October 22, 19TL TELEP!-1CN ES: AREA CODE· 714 540-2910 962-2411 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 Gentlemen: Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting on October 13, 1971, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation Distrlct No. 7 will meet in an adjourned regular meeting: hja Wednesday, October 27, 1971 at 7:00 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California J'/ I . . Q /"ij' .