HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971-09-30 1 � r
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
I County Sanitation Districts P. o. Box 5175
or Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
!fit QTPIrT Nr-t 1 - 7
II ----- AGENDA
v Adjourned Regular Meeting A1)11URN6IENTS.,,,,, .
September `8,7, 1971 - 5:00 p.m. co;,;r & MILEAGE....
30 FILES SET UP•.„
�1.) Roll Call RESOLUTIONS CERTIFIED
LETTERS WRITTEN.••
(2) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary MINUTES WRITTE'N,,,�.�
MINUTES FILED .'
L% (3) Report of the General Manager
�4) Report of the General Counsel
(5) DISTRICT 1
Consi6era.tion of motion to receive and file letter from
Environmental Protection Agency approving award of
contracts for 1970-71 Improvements (WPC-CAL-573) . See
page A
ll
(6) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to
the plans and specifications for Administration-Engineering
Building Addition, Job No. J-7-2 and Addenda Nos. 1 and 2
to the plans and specifications for Vehicle Maintenance
V Facilities, Job No. J-12. See pages "B11
"D" and "E"
(7) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of Resolution No. 71-118-1, to receive and
file bld tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contrac
for Administrations-Engineering Building Addition, Job 'No. J-7-2
V and Vehicle maintenance Facilities, Job No. J-12 to B. H.
Miller Construction Co. in the amount of $477, 500.00. See
pages "F" and 11G?'
(8) DISTRICT 1
,1onsideration of Resolution No. 71-119-1, to receive and
file recommendation of Counsel.,,e GeneraCounsel.,, awardingand awarding
contract for Interplant Influent Tnterceptor, Job No. T._9
to Kordick & Rados, a. joint venture of Kordick & Sons, �1
Inc. , Baldwin Park, and Steve P. Rados, Inc. , i`:onrovia,
in the amount of $6,387,511. 00. See pages "H"
and "J"
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of Resolution No. 71-120-1, to receive and
file tabulat'i cn andrecommendation, and awardinb contract
LS
for Ileadworks "C" Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-11-1,v
to E.T.I. & Kordick., a joint venture of Environmental
�A? Tectonics, Inc. , Anaheim, and Kordick & Sons, Inc. , Baldwin
t. Park, in the amount of $1,228,000. 00. See pages "K"
a-rid "L 1'
(10) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the
/ plans and specifications for Sunflower Interceptor, Reach
v 3 ?nd '?red Trill Inte-centor, Reaches 4 and
P1o. 7-6-3. See page - 11M"
V
(11) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No. 71-121-7, to receive and
file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding `
contract for Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 3 and Red
Hill Interceptor, Reaches 4 and 5, Contract No. 7-6-3
to Colich Construction Co. , in the amount of $1,060,422.58.
See pages "N" and "Olt
(12) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion accepting proposal of Boyle
Engineering, dated September 14, 1971, for engineering
services in connection with preparation of plans and
specifications for McGaw Avenue Subtrunk, Portion
of Reach 49 and Jamboree Road Subtrunk No. 2, Reach
52, for a lump sum fee of $3,200. See page "P" L�
(13) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to receive and file letter
�! from Hall & Foreman, Inc. , dated September 10, 1971,
requesting modification of the connection charge for the
Calvary Chapel to be located at the northwest corner
of Fairview and Sunflower Avenues in the City of Santa
< <X Ana; atld to derby said request as contrary to
�1 i ,I the provisions and administrative procedures of Ordinance
711, as amended. See page " p"
DISTRICT 7
Report of staff re subsidence problem on Redhill Avenue
between Bryan and First Street in Tustin, and consideration
of motion to receive and file letter of General Counsel
�. to City of Tustin, dated August 25, 1971,- and reply of City
( of Tustin, dated September 16, 1971, and directing General
�./ ✓� Counsel to proceed with preparation of agreement after
consultation with City Attorney for City of Tustin. See
pages " ,' and 'S "
(15) DISTRICT 7 ^ �
Consideration of motion to accept proposal of C. Arthur
Nisson and Jack J. Rimel, dated September 2, 1971, relative
to performing legal services in connection with proposed
Assessment District No. 9, for a minimum fee of $750.00. V
See page 'T "
(16 ) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of actions on proposed Assessment District
No. 9. (Proceedings may be referred to special counsel
for the assessment district, if desired. Copies of
resolutions will be distributed to Directors at meeting
time. )
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 71-122-7, initiating
-� proceedings in Assessment District No. 9
(b) Report of Ted Finster/Carl Carlson, of Boyle Engineering,
and presentation of construction }Mans for sanitary sewers for
Assessment District No. 9
''Woe c (c) Consideration of motion to approve, receive and order
filed plans and specifications for Assessment District No. 9
l (d) Consideration of motion to approve, receive and order
filed map of proposed boundaries for Assessment District T,io. 9
U;• (e) Consideration of motion to approve receive and order
filed "Engineer' s Construction Estimate', dated Septer,,ber_�D,
1971, for Assessment District No. 9
-2-
(17) DISTRICT 7
Further consideration of Petition for Annexation of-
Tentative Traut No. 7389. See des rlUrr uVn ��
� and rrW'r � �,���.v"' O/t��- 5/30 7/
� (18) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to 'receive :and order filed
letter relative to Estate of Marion E. Jones, deceased.
See page nXr.�
(19) DISTRICT 7
onside ration of proposal of Nor--Vada Land Co. to construct
Master Plan Subtrunk Sewer in Chapman Avenue between
Santiago Boulevard and Crawford Canyon Road. See page
nYn
(20) DISTRICT 1
0 -her business and communications, if any
'(21) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(22) DISTRICT -7 '
Other business and communications, if any
(23) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn �-61
A7
OW
V � y
J
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY a
REGION IX
,loop/ 760 MARKET STREET
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94202
SEP 28 1971
Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Dear Mr. Harper: Re: IIPC-CAL-573
We have reviewed the Part B of the Offer and Acceptance,
together with supporting material, and find it to be satis-
factory. You are authorized to award contracts to the lowest
responsible bidders , in accordance with your recommendations,
as follows:
J. Putman Henck Sedimentation Basin "K"
and Digester "K" at Plant #2 $1,164 , 540*
J. E. Hoagland Sedimentation Basins L & M.
& W. W. Hoagland and Digesters L & M at
�.d (jt. venture) Plant #2 1,383 ,000*
E. T. I & Kordick Headworks "C" Expansion
(a jt. venture) at Plant #2 1,228,000*
Kordick and Rados Interplant Influent
(a jt. venture) Interceptor 6 ,387.,511*
B. H. Miller Con- Administration-Engineering
struction Co. Building Addition and
Vehicle Maintenance
Facilities 477,500*
*All eligible for Federal participation.
As soon as the construction contracts have been awarded, please
send two certified copies to this office and one copy directly
to the California State Water Resources Control Board. In
addition, as soon as they become available, please forward
the documents checked on Enclosure 1.. The attached Notification
to Hiring Halls should be reproduced in the quantity desired
and completed and distributed by the contractor as required.
Agenda Item #5 A-1 District 1
i
Page 2
Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager
Since the Federal grant may not exceed 55 percent of the
estimated eligible cost of the project, the grant is reduced
hereby in the amount of $113 ,830 (i.e. , from $6, 897 ,000 to
$6,783,170 rounded downward to the nearest $10 . )
Should you have any questions, please contact this office.
Sincerely,
J
Director
4ir & Water Programs Division
Enclosures
1. Necessary Documents
2. Notice to Hiring Halls
3. Procedure for Handling Change Orders
4. Fiscal Records to be Maintained
CC: California State WRC Board
John Carollo Engineers (w/encls. )
Agenda Item #5 A-2 District 1
I
y
ADDENDUM N0 . 1
To The
SPECIFICATIONS AMD DRAWINGS
For Construction of
AD141NISTRATION- ENGINEERING
BUILD1NIG ADDITION JOB NO . J- 7-2
For
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
Prepared By
WILLIAM P . FICKER , A. I . A.
550 Nevrport Center Drive
Newport Beach , California
'Telephone (714) 644-1581
Date : September 10 , 1971
Th.e following changes , omissions , additions , and/or alterations.
in , on , and to the drawings and specifications shall apply to
proposals made for and to the various parts of the work affected
thereby . -
Careful note of this Addendum shall be taken by all . parties of
interest so that the proper allowance may be made in all compu-
tations , estimates , and contracts , and all trades affected shall
be fully 'advised in the performance of the work which will be
'required of-them.
-In case of conflict between drawings , specifications , and this
Addendum , this Addendum shall govern . This Addendum supersedes
all previous instructions , alternates , and proposed alternates
pertaining to these items .
SPECIFICATIONS
1 . 2-A 16 Asphalt Paving Removal : Remove that portion of asphalt
paving installed under Vehicle Maintenance building contract
as temporary paving . Asphalt concre-te shall be' saw cut and
removed completely from site including base material .
ADDENDUM NO . 1
Page 1 of 2
'Agenda Item #6 &-1 District 1
DETAILS
1 . Delete the following details : D-7 . 6 , E-7 . 6 and F-7 :6
DRAWINGS
1 ., Sheet A-5 - Door . Schedule: Door No . `38 'add notation "Existing
glass to be removed an replaced with 1 /4" tempered glass . " '
2. Sheet A-7 - Stair No 2 Section A/A-7 - Add handrail reference
B-8 . 4
3 . Sheet E- 1 - Electrical : Delete existing sheet dated 8/2/81
and insert revised E- 1 sheet .dated 9/10/71. . .
ADDENDUM NO . 1
Page 2 of 2
Agenda Item #6 B-2 District 1
i
- 1
ADDENDUM NO . 2 .
To The -
SPECIFICATIONS
For Construction of
ADi•1INISTRATIO(;=ENGINEERING
BUILDING ADDITION
JOB NO . J- 7-2
For -
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
Prepared By
WILLIAM P . FICKER , A. I . A.
550 Newport Center Drive
Newport Beach , .Cal i forni a
�..✓ Telephone : ( 714 ) 644- 1581
Date : September 15 , . 1971
The following changes , omissions , additions , and/or alterations
in , on , and to the specifications shall apply to proposals made
for and to the various parts of the work affected thereby .
Careful note of this Addendum shall be taken by all parties of
interest so that the proper allowance may be made in all compu-
tations , estimates , and contracts , and all trades affected shall
be fully advised in the performance of the work which will be
required of 'them.
In case of conflict between specifications and this Addendum ,
this Addendum shall govern . This Addendum supersedes all '
previous instructions , alternates , and proposed alternates per-
taining to these items .
SPECIFICATIONS
1 . Section 10-S - Toilet Accessories
Add complete section ( page 1 and 2 attach.ed ) .
ADDENDUM NO . 2
Page 1 of 1 .
Aenda Item 6 C-1 District 1
i
DIVISION 10
SPECIALTIES
SECTION 10-S
TOILET ACCESSORIES.
10-S 1 . GENERAL : Requirements of Division 1 apply to work of
This Section .
10-S 2 . SCOPE : Provide toilet accessories as indicated and
specified , complete .
10-S .3. WORK INCLUDED : Principal items of work include the
f01.1ouing : `
a. Paper towel dispenser and waste receptacles .
b, Toilet paper holders .
c. Soap dispensers .
d. Sanitary napkin dispensers .
e . Sanitary napkin disposals .
10-S 4. ITEMS AND MANUFACTURE : Locate where shown on drawings ,.' as
specified or as d�irected . Fasten to metal partitions with
plated through bolts ; to drywall with metal grounds tapped .
to receive machine screws .
a . Paper 'To►•rel Dispenser and Waste Receptacle :*. Semi - recessed ,
stainless steel , satin finish , Bobrick B-3606 ; taro
(2 ) required .
b . Toilet Paper Holders : Surface mounted ,. double roll ,
polished aluminum finish , Bobrick B-273 ; * four (4 )
required .
c. Sanitary Napkin Dispenser : Recessed , satin finish ,
stainless steel', Bobrick B-350 ; one ( 1 ) required .
d. Sanitary Napkin Disposal : Recessed , satin finish ,
stainless steel , Bobrick B-354 ; one ( 1 ) required ,
mounted in toilet partition . -
e . Soap Dispenser : Surface mounted , satin f inish , stain-
Tess steel , 1 quart 8 ounce capacity ; Bbb'ri ck B-8292
liquid valve ; four ( 4 ) required . .
f. Approved equals shall be as manufactured by Accessory.
Specialties , Inc. , or Bradley Washfountain Company
\.oJ
10-S 5 . - CLEAN-UP : Remove all rubbish , debris , surplus material and
equipment .and legally dispose . of them off the premises .
TOILET ACCESSORIES
10-S Page 1
'Agenda Item � C District 1
.10-5 6 . GUARANTEE : Furnish written guarantee in accordance. with .
Division 1 for a period- of one (1 ) year from date of
completion .
TOILET ACCESSORIES
1.0-S Page 2
Y
District 1
Agenda Stem �/6 C-3
i
i
ADDENDUM 1,10 . 1
To The
SPECIFICATIONS AND 'DRAW INGS
For Construction of
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY
JOB NO. J- 12
- For
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
Prepared By
41ILLIAM P . FICKER , A. I . A.
550 Newport Center Drive
Newport Beach , California
Telephone : ( 714 ) 644- 1581
Date : September 10 , 1971
The following changes , omissions , additions , and/or alterations
in , on , and to the drawings and specifications shall apply to
proposals made for and to the v_ariqus parts of the work affected
thereby .
. Careful note of this Addendum shall be taken by all parties of
interest so that the proper allowance may be made in all compu-
tations , estimates , and contracts , and all trades affected shall
be fully advised in the performance of the work which will be .
required of 'them.
In case of conflict between drawings , specifications , and this
Addendum , this Addendum shall govern . This Addendum supersedes
all previous instructions , alternates , and proposed alternates
pertaining to these items .
SPECIFICATIONS
1 . Section 9-C - Ceramic Tile :
Paragraph 9-C 6. Add : Wall base tile shall be coved type
base to meet floor tile .
ADDENDUM NO. 1
Page 1 of 2 .
Agenda Item #6 D-1 District 1
DETAILS : � -
1 . Section 3 Door Details
Sheet 3 . 5 - Insert 'Weer sheet .
DRAM!I NGS :
1 . Sheet A-2
Floor Plan - Men ' s Room 104 - Floor finish to be ceramic
tile . See Finish Schedule .
2 . Sheet P-2
Detail B/P-2 Sandtra,p :
Traffic .Grate - change 18" dim. to. be 22" , change note to be
24" x 25" traffic grate .
Traffic Cover - change 24 " dim. to b-e 22 " , change note to be
24 " ,x 25" traffic cover.
. 3 . Sheet E- 1 - Electrical : Delete existing sheet. dated 8/21 /71
and insert revised E- 1 sheet dated 9/10/71 .
Attachment
PDDEEN1QUo fMg . 1
g
Agenda Item #0- D-2 District 1
xaua�ta�'�rmcsevzz=iraars .�..�:sa.�.•��e:x�+n>_���:•rn-...—•ter_xa�•-sesr..:st.asvc.o.�taa,rna."aF-x-�s�aC.:..:a-a -�
• i ,
r
1
f✓riC�-'i F�✓i v'rilai�a==ice `•fi r_,-3:• -
• •._�_. �" .. ^__fi`t,^�--�1 ------... -= \� ••�''/�J r
7.
tv
SCALE
• 1
i
iRe:RIMLT�"�[A[4AJ.'a']dAflmctoubC`•SV4St i
{{, DETAIL
'racr_�a.:�-. - szr�u�sz�au�sc.•••�-.�„r��--. -•. - --
- - - REVISION a
T,-S,51 r: .�
CHECKED i'l..tl�ls• ts�t�;a�1: •� ''s rF=d� 9"1 '�� � � -- — — i t
�:.is�Jf:. i:ii2'li�Ltir2i �}.. Ii it:�:���:«J� ''�'^ '-'.�-ra• .�
ri
t •ns.Yrsraar-�
r y
'AOnda ztem #6 D_3 District", 7
i
i
i
ADDENDUM [10 . 2
To The
SPECIFICATIONS AND •DRAWINGS
For Construction of
VEHICLE MAINTENAIICE FACILITY
JOE PLO . J- 12
For
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORAidGC COUNTY
Prepared by
WILLIAM P . FICKER , A. I . A.
550 Newport Center Drive
Newport Beach , California
Telephone : ( 714 ) 644- 1581
Date : September 15 , 1971
The following changes , omissions , additions , and/or alterations
in , on , and to the drawings and specifications shall apply to
proposals made for and to the various parts of the work affected
thereby.
Careful note of this Addendum shall be taken by all parties of
interest so that the proper allowance may be made in all compu-
tations , estimates , and contracts , and all trades affected shall
be fully advised in the performance of the work which will be
required of them.
In case of conflict between drawings , specifications , and this .-
Addendum , this Addendum shall govern . This addendum supersedes
all previous instructions , alternates , and proposed alternates
pertaining to these items .
DRAWINGS :
1 . Sheet A-3 - Door Schedule :
Revise doors number 1 , 2 , 3 , 4•, and 5 •• type of material to be
metal .
ADDENDUM NO . 2
Page 1 of 2
Agenda Item '6 E-1 District 1
SPECIFICATIONS
1'. Sedtion 8-F - Finish Hardware
Ad'd Heading No . 7
. 3 Doors #13 Exterior to Elect. Room '
9- But.ts 179 4-1 /2 x 4-1/2 NRP.
3 Locks 351
6 Flush B'ol is 1358
3 Threshold. 198A
6. Door Holders #2
ADDENDUM -NO . 2
Page 2 of 2
Agenda Item , E_2 District- 1
B 1 D T A B U L A T 1 0 N !ix•c%iL.l UV.0 L• a Z;J UJ.J1W tPe
S F� E T J-7-2. . ' 273-2 n,,J-12
"" _ DATE September 21, 71, 11 :00 a.m.
> CONTRACT FOR: ADMINISTRATION - ENGINEERING BUILDING ADDITION, JOB NO. J-7-2
m & VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITIES, JOB NO. J-12
J-7-2 J-12 DEDUCT FOR
H CONTFAC TOR SCHEDiyTi.FL I j •HF„_DUT E, TT ONE CONTRACT . NET BID
1•B. H. Miller Construction- Co.
5 2152 Du Pont Drive.
' Newport. Beach, California 92664 237,600.00 239,900.00 -0- $477,500.00
2.Julian-Waterfield(Joint Venture)
2302 S. Anne St.
Santa Ana, California 92704 255,000.00 252,o00.Oo 5,000.00 502,000.00
3.Allison Honer Company
P. 0. Box 84
Santa Ana, California 92702 2540988.00 258,o48.00 • 3,500.00 509,536.00
4.1 orris Builders
3912 East Century Blvd.
Lyn:;ood, California 252,947.00 289,401.00 ,000.00 538,348..00
5.Merco Construction Engineers, !no.
1704 Ruxton Lane
It Redondo Beach, California 90278 (Bid submitted for both projects only) -0- 552,837.00
.Coastate Builders
2 750 East -Spring Street
Long Beach, California 90806 . 241,000.00 (Schedule I bid only) 241,000.00
7.Rilssell S. Best, General Contractor,
2148 W. loth Street '
Long Beach, California 90813 255,990.00 (Schedule I bid only) -0- 255,990.00
8.Cloclt Construction Company
14799 Chestnut Street
Westminster, California 92683 (Schedule II bid gnly) 240,gg0.o0 -0- , 240,990.00 .
9.Aler. Robertson Company
4300 Campus Drive
Newport Beach, California 92660 (Schedule II bid only) 245,000.00 -0- 245,000.00 -
1 .Victor Construction Co. , Inc.
11600 E. Artesia
d Artesia, California (Schedule II bid only) 253,563.00 -0- 253,563.00
ll.biayfair Construction Co.
N• 716 E. Edna Place
Covina, California 91723 (Schedule II bid only) -254,842.00 -0- 254,842.00
RESOLUTION NO. 71-118-1
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOBS NO. J-7-2 AND J-12
'.•' A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR
ADMINISTRATION-ENGINEERING BUILDING ADDITION
AND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITIES, JOBS .NO.
' J-7-2 AND J-12
---------------
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted
to the Board of Directors by Wm. P. Ficker, A. I.A, District' s
architect , and concurred in by the District 's Chief Engineer, that
award of contract be made to B. H. MILLER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,
Contractor, for AD14INISTRATION-ENGINEERING BUILDING ADDITION AND
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITIES, JOBS NO. J-7-2 AND J-12, and the
proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered
filed; and,
Section 2. That the contract for said- Jobs No. J-7-2 and J-12
be awarded to B. H. MILLER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Contractor, in the
total amount of $477,500, in accordance with the terms of their bid
and the prices contained therein; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District
are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract
with said contractor for said work pursuant, to the provisions of
the specifications and contract documents therefor; and,
Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are
sv� hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful
bidders.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting on September
30, 1971•
Agenda Item #7 -G- District 1
RESOLUTION NO. 71-119-1
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. I-8
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS . OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR
INTERPLANT INFLUENT INTERCEPTOR, JOB NO. I-8
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1,
of Orange County, California
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 55 65 7, and 11, of Orange County, adopted
Resolution No. 71-115, conditioning award of contract upon receipt
of recommendation of the General Counsel; and,
Section 2. That the letter this day submitted to the Board
of Directors by the General Counsel, datbd September 28, 1971,
recommending that award of contract be made to KORDICK & RADOS,
Contractor, for -INTERPLANT INFLUENT INTERCEPTOR, Job No. I-8, and
the proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and
ordered filed; and,
Section 3. That the contract for said Interplant Influent
Interceptor, Job No. I-8, be awarded to KORDICK AND RADOS, Contractor,
in the total amount of $6,387,511, in accordance with the terms of
their bid and the prices contained therein; and,
Section 4. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District
are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract
with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of
the specifications and contract documents therefor; and,
Section 5. That all other bids received for said work are
hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful
bidders.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting on
September 30, 1971.
Agenda Item #8 -H- District_
MILLER,NISSON F3 KOGLER
CLARK MILLER ATTORNEYS AT LAW
TELEPHONE
C.ARTHUR NISSON 2014 NORTH BROADWAY 542-6771
NELSON KOGLER SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706
H.LAWSON MEAD
September 28, 1971
Board of Directors
County Sanitation District #1 of
Orange County, California
Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California
Re : Job No. I-8
Gentlemen:
The status of the right-of-way insofar as
the City of Huntington Beach is concerned appears to
be secure for the District and its contractors for the
subject contract. I am therefore recommending that you.
proceed to award the contract as soon as you have received
final federal and state approval of the project upon which
the grant funding this project is conditioned .
Very truly yours,
i
General Counsel
CAN:cp
I
Agenda Item �8 -I- District 1
I
)i 'A PI ).) V L) li L JL V lY
S HE E T En. Ineers' s e ,1971 ,11 :0
st. L� o5,499.
DATEAu�•ust0 a .m.
CONTRACT FOR; INTERPLANT INFLUENT INTERCEPTOR, ,
JOB NO. I-8
r DEDUCT FOR
CONTRACTOR SCHEDULE I SCHEDULE II ONE CONTRACT NET BID
1. KORDICK AND RADOS, A JOINT VENTURE
0o P. 0. Box 279
Baldwin Park, California 91706
5,231,536.00 1,332,975.00 177,000.00 $6,387,511.00
2. J. F. SHEA CO. , INC.
655 Brea Canyon Road
Walnut, California 91789
4.00 . 1 28 o0.00 20 00.00 6 21 4
• SULLY MILIJ.:R CONTRACTING COMPANY
3000 East South Street
Long Beach, California 90805
401 oo 1 4 1 10 oo ll0 000 0 6
`•`- P.ERINI CORPORATION
One Maritime Plaza
San Francisco, California 94111*
2 488.0o 1,847,000.00 549,000.00 *6 82 . 488 oo
• ICEMPER-DRUIM,M0ND-BR0NNECK,
A Joint Venture
1710 Santa Monica Blvd.
Santa .Monica California 90404 4 6 00.00 1 88 1 0.00 000.00 6 82 6 0.0o
6. VIDO ARTUKOVICH &- SON, INC.
11155 Rush Street
So. El Monte, California
10 774.00 1,278 1 .00 . -0 6 288 96 .00
- MATT J. ZAICH CONSTRUCTION' CO.
6822 Farmdale Avenue
North Hollywood, California 6 101 4 0.00 1 3 8 11.00 • -0- • * 4 61.Oo
eerrtarY .
m CORRECTED TOTALS of t
Couhn D
5 strict
C 1n Oi S�rutati,or'
N.
9. No
�,- sP 8 1y 71
RESOLUTION NO. 71-120-1
• AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. P2-11-1
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR HEADWORKS "C�' EXPANSION AT
PLANT NO. 25 JOB NO. P2-11-1
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted
to the Board of Directors by John Carollo Engineers, and concurred
in by the District' s Deputy Chief Engineer, that award of contract
be made to E.T.I. & Kordick, a joint venture, for Headworks . "C"
Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-11-1, and the bid tabulation
and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered
filed; and,
Section 2. That the contract for said Job No. P2-11-1, be
awarded to E.T.I. & Kordick, Contractor, in the total amount of
$1,228,000.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and
the prices contained therein; and,
Section 3. That all other bids received for said work
are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the
unsuccessful bidders; and,
Section 4. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District
are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract
with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of
the specifications and contract documents therefor.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular adjourned meeting held
September 30, 1971.
Agenda Item #9 -K- p; strict 1
r
Engineer' s Estimate $1,200, 000.
o
BID TABULATION
S H E E T
Date September 1: 00 A
Contract: Headworks "C" Expansion at Plant_ No. 2
Job No. P2-11-1
Contractor Total. Bid
1. E.T.I. & Kordick, A Joint Venture _
9778 Wes# Katella, Suite 103
Anaheim, California 92804 $1,228,000.
2. Ziebarth and Alper
21205 Bolsa Street
Torrance, California $15315,700.
3. I. Putnam Heiick, A Corporation
550 West 40th Street (P. 0. Box 2476)
San Bernardino, California 92406 $15355,000.
4 . Climate Conditioning Corp.
10560 Fern Avenue
Stanton, California 90680 $15413,966.
5 C. Harper Construction Company, Inc.
1209 West 190th Street
.Gardena, California 90248 $1,588,600.
6:
7. .
8.
9 •
10. -
Agenda Item #9 -L- District 1
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
of Orange County, California
ADDENDUM NO. 1
to
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS AND. PLANS
for
SUNFLOAR INTERCEPTOR, REACH 3
AND .
RED HILL INTERCEPTOR,' REACHES 4 AND 5 ,
CONTRACT NO. .7-6-3
PROPOSAL AND BOND FORMS
1 . Page 1 , in second line on the page which ' reads: "TO: THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 ," change NO. 1 to N0. 7. _
2. Page 9, in eighth line on the page which reads : "DISTRICT NO. 1 ,
of Orange County, California, a public corporation" change NO. 1 to
NO. 7.
.3. Page 11 , in the ninth line on the page which reads : ".DISTRICT:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 ," change NO. 1 to NO. 7.
PLANS
1 . Sheet No. 4 - The approximate surface at the centerline of the road shown
on the profile between Station 247+00 and Station 252+00 should be raised
1 .0 foot and extended to join the existing elevation at Station 245+00.
Conrad Hohener, Jr. , C.E: 10951
CH: ld
9-15-71
B-007-101-52
Addendum No. 1
Page 1
Agenda Item #10 -M- District 7
Engineert.s Estimate :$926,,301.00,
BID - TABULATION
S H E ET
Date September 21, 1971,
-11:00 a.m.
`✓Contract for: Sunflower Interceptor, Reach.-3 &
Red Hill Interceptor, Reaches ZE & 5
Contract No. 7-6-3
'CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
1. Colich Construction Co.
8320 Isis Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90045 $1,060,422.58
2. Mike Masanovieh Construction Co. , Inc.
63 Alta Street
Arcadia, California 91006 1,071,752.00
3. Burdick Contractors, Inc.
P. 0. Box 99180
Sari Diego, California 92109 1,1072,900.00
4. Merco Construction Engineers, Inc.
1704 Ruxton Lane
Redondo Beach, California 90278 1,090,073.00
5. Aristo Construction Company
1141 No. Highland Oaks Drive
.Arcadia, California 91006 1,116,252.00
Sully Miller Contracting Company
3000 East South Street
Long Beach, California 90805 1,127,469.00
7. K. E. C. Company
P. 0. Box 1338
Hawaiian Gardens, California 11167:623.00
8. Ernest E. Pestana, Inc.
2225 Old Oakland Road
San Jose, California 95131 1,216,079.00
9. Steve Kral Corporation
P. 0. Box 190
Baldwin Park, California 91706 1,224,279.00
10. Matt J. Zaich Construction Co. &
Matt J. Zaich Individually
6822 Farmdale Ave.
North Hollywood, California 1,225,390.111
11. Charles L. Burch & Sons, Inc.
2419 North Chico Avenue
South El Monte, California 91733 1,236,830.00
12. Steve Bubalo Construction ,
P. 0. Box 1067
Reseda, California 11237,378.00
3. George Miller Construction Co.
3032 Bandini Blvd.
Los Angeles, California 90023 1,241.94o.90
Agenda Item #11 -N- District 7
RESOLUTION N0, 71-121-7
AWARDING CONTRACT NO,, 7-6-3
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR,
REACH 3 AIv'D RED HILL INTERCEPTOR. REACHES
�F AND 5., CONTRACT NO. 7-6-3
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day
submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering, District's
engineers, and concurred in by the District' s Chief Engineer, that
award of contract be made to Colich Construction Co. , Contractor,
for SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR, REACH 3 AND RID HILL INTERCEPTOR,
REACHES 4 AND 5, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-3, and the posposal submitted for
said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; -and,
Section 2. That the contract for said Contract No. 7-6-3,
be awarded to Colich Construction Co. , Contractor, in the total
amount of $1,060,422. 58, in accordance with the terms of their
bid and the prices contained therein; and,
. Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District
are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract
with said contractorfor said work pursuant to the provisions of
the specifications and contract documents therefor; and,
Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are
hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the
unsucessful bidders.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned -regular meeting on
September 30, 1971.
Agenda Item #11 -0- District 7
s � .
' 1
f r
ENGINEERS e ARCHIT'ECTS
iJ
0.
` 412 SOUTH LYON STREET SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHONE (714) 547-4471
ADDRESS REPLY.TO P.O. BOX 178
September 14, 1971
Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager
County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County
Post Office Box 8127 -
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Attention Mr. Ray E. Lewis
Deputy Chief Engineer
McGow Avenue Subtrunk, Portion. of Reach 49
Jamboree Road Subtrunk No. 2, Reach 52
In response to your request we submit the following proposal for engineering
�. services to prepare plans and specifications for subject facilities and to provide
construction staking.
The total length of the proposed project is approximately 3,250 feet with an
estimated construction cost of $751000. Design of the subtrunks will conform
to district standards. The Irvine Industrial Complex will be the contracting
agency and will let the contract to the lowest responsible bidder through public
bidding procedures. The specification format wil! conform to Irvine Industrial
Complex standards.
We have discussed the project with the i.I.C. staff and their consulting engineers
and feel that the topographic and survey control data they presently have on hand
can be used iri lieu of making a separate field survey for design. The only field
survey requirements will be for construction staking.
Our fee for preparing plans and specifications will be a lump stim amount of
$3,200. This fee is predicated on the scope of work conforming in general to
the master plan layout. Should any extenuating circumstances appear when
checking the design flows for the drainage area such as larger than normal
discharges from proposed developments requiring extensive studies to revamp the
master plan, we feel additional compensation should be made on a per diem basis.
Per diem work would, of course, be approved in advance.
We propose that construction staking be done on a per diem basis at $48 per hour
for a 3-man survey crew and $21 per hour for a licensed surveyor. We are ready
to proceed with the work upon receiving authorization.
BOYLE ENGINEERING
Conrad Hohener, Jr., C. E. 10951
P R O F E SS I O N A L E N G i N E E R I N G A N D A R C H I T E C T U R A L S E R V i C E S
Agenda Item > .12 _P,_ District 7
• j
y
CIVIL ENGINEERING ENVIRONPlEtJTAL PLANNING LAND 8URVEYING
September 10, 1971 Job #1562
Orange County Sanitation Districts
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA..
Attention: - Mr. Fred Harper, General Manager
Regarding: Calvary Chapel
I am requesting -on behalf of Calvary Chapel, a modification of
the connection' charge for the church shown on the attached print.
The proposed church is to be located at the northwest corner of
Fairview and Sunflower Avenues in the City of Santa Ana. The
enitre site is 9 . 8 acres and has 542 feet of frontage on Fairview
Avenue. The acreage distribution is as follows:
Parking and Parking Landscaping 5 .6 Acres
Playing Field 1.6
Building Site, •includes Chapel,
Fellowship Ha11, Nursery and
Classrooms 2 .6 Acres
At the present time we intend to construct the parking lot and
to erect a tent in which to hold services temporarily. In ap-
proximately 30 days, we hope to begin construction on the Chapel.
Construction of the nursery and eight classrooms is about one
year away. The twenty-eight classrooms to the rear of the site
and the FelloN-.ship Hall is future construction and perhaps five
years away.
The problem now facing the church is that at the present time,
based upon the Sanitation District's charges it will be necessary
for them to pay $3,675 for the regular connection charge, plus
L../ $5, 420 for the trunk. connection charge. _ Tnis represents a total
of $9,095 in sewerage charges, yet they only intend to connect
appro}:imately 10 water closets and 5 urinals, plus some lavatory
and drinking fountain units in the Chapel itself. Even at the
2530 NORTH GRAND AVENUE P.O. BOX 11667 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92711 TELEPHONE (714) 542-2336
Agenda Item A9 Q_1 • District 7
i
-2--
Orange County Sanitation Districts September 10 , 1971
` ultimate development, it is not anticipated that the total
fixture count would be more than twice what the initial count
will be.
We believe that the charges in this particular instance are not
in line with the benefit to be derived from the connection be-
cause of the small area actually being used for development.
Therefore, we respectfully request a modification of the sewerage
charge for this particular installation.
We realize that this is an unusual request. However we do feel
that it is a fair one for both the Church and the District.
We would appreciate anything that might be done to reduce and/or
postpone the payment of the total sewerage charge as outlined.
Thank you for your cooperation and attention to this matter.
HALL & FOREMAN., INC.
Hugh4_. FViceresident
HHF:m
Enclosure
1, r
Agenda Item #1 Q-2 District 7
. I Cluj•' \\\ \ \ ¢++•Il \. \ \ \ \ \\\\\\\� '.\\\,�`\ ,\ '\\\•� ' \�`y_\\ 1\,
• �' [ _•r �,:.-jam i i_r:..� �1.��. .�1��.-LC---'J-�" --� j Ifl:.:/ .—• (� �
. � .n Ci�r� I I 1•
T yL t. _—-6 •.y. t of � ,�i � C3 ".
orn a woo
4- LLJ
UO
LA
It
f
I a t
Ia �rKv:e:•:n.v i+Jy�J..w.. - _ M..�'m t+r•�J a Y wi. Ql
..L Az
' O �.J'•• .� 7J �••Y {M uJ`: SVl4 Il •X J�+la+r 7n1�•/7 M O.Fv �M�• C
30p3AI A i I A I VIJ j9b
Y U 11 M V r)
i
i
+ i
i n
MJLLr_s,,Nl55oN 3 KoCL-S,
CtARK MLLLCrr ATTOnN CYS AT LAW TELCP"Or,r.
C.Anj#1Vn 2014 N01ITF► OnOAOWAY _ 6�2•Gf),
• NCLSON KOGLCn SANTA ANA,CALIfoANIA 9270G
_ 1
f/.LAWSO►r MCAO !
August
25th
1 9 7 1
City Council
City of Tustin
Tustin, California
Re City of Tustin Median Island
Construction - Job No. 7-3
Gentlemen:
The directors of County Sanitation Dis-
trict No. 7 have considered the problem of subsidance
of a portion of the curbing of your median construc-
tion in Red Hill Avenue northerly of Bryan Avenue.
S.t appears that the construction of the
sewer by County Sanitation District No. 7 in Red Hill .
1•1.� Avenue some nine years ago was not the cause of the
subsidance. The sewer was constructed and the back-
fill compacted according to county requirements which
were controlling at that time. The road was resurfaced'
and used for the intervening nine years without failure.
Your median construction changed the structure of the road
, s and was the direct cause of the subsequent subsidance .
The directors of County Sanitation District
No. 7 do recognize a legitimate difference of opinion
regarding this problem. They also recognize the urgency
of the need for repairs and the emergency nature of the
situation.
As a compromise and without admitting liability,
the directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 will
approve the use of sewer connection fees collected by the-
City of Tustin for payment of. the costs of repairs to
correct subsidance in Red Hill Avenue for the 600 ft.
section of median now under construction by the City of
Tustin under the following terms and conditions :
I, County Sanitation- District No. 7
engineers and the City Engineer of the City of Tustin
Shall prepare and appz-ove the plans and specifications for
Agenda Item #14 R-1
• District 7 `
#2 -- City .rouncil
Aug . ,: 25, 1971
correcting the subsidance involved.
2. County Sanitation District No. V will have
the repair work performed according to said approved plans
and specifications and the City of Tustin will pay for the
cost of repairs from said connection fees heretofore collec-
ted by it for connections to district sewers .
3. The City of Tustin will assume all responsibility
for further subsidance in Red Hill Avenue in the 600 ft. area
involved after completion of this repair project.
4. The City of Tustin will not undertake to alter
the structure of Red Hill Avenue in the future in any area
of' Red hill Avenue without first notifying County Sanitation _
District No. 7 of its proposed construction work.
5. The County Sanitation District No . 7 does not
admit liability for any subsidance in any other part of Red
Hill Avenue should it occur in the future .'
If this proposal for settlement of the problem is
satisfactory, please advise the District in writing and in--.
struct your City Engineer to act in accord with this proposal-. -
Respectfully yours ,
t .
CO' Arthur Nisson
General Counsel for
County Sanitation District No . 7
CAN:mjb
cc: Mr. Clifford C. Miller
Mr. Paul G. Brown
Agenda Item #. 1 R-2 District 7
o
1 '
September 16, 1971
Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District #7
P. O. Box 8127 '
Fountain Valley, CA, 92708
Attention: Fred Harper, Manager _
Gentlemen:
We are in receipt of the letter dated August 25, 1971, signed by
C. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel for County Sanitation District
No. 7 .
In reviewing the letter, the City does not concur with the con-
tentions made by Mr. Nisson regarding the cause of failure, and
�qw� our position is proven so by the soil tests made by the City of
Tustin. We do, however, appreciate the Board' s attitude with
regard to the mutual problem concerning failure and settlement
of the backfill material over the District' s trunk sewer line
in Red Hill north 'of Bryan Avenue in the City of Tustin.
As you know, the City Council has authorized the expenditure of
up to $10, 000 of County Sanitation District No. 7 Main Trunk Funds
held in trust by the City of Tustin, at their August 16 , 1971,
meeting as indicated by the enclosed minute order.
With regard to the specific conditions - proposed in Mr. Nisson 's
letter, we are pleased to be able to report that our staff has met
with the District's staff and agreement in principle has been
reached as to the methods of repair and that final specifications
for the repairs are nearing completion.-
' With regard to item #2 of Mr. Nisson's letter, this is in con-
currence with the Council 's previous action with regard to the
cost for repairs and with the understanding that the repairs
shall be considered complete when approved by the City Engineer
of the City of Tustin and that the costs of the soil tests and
services of our soil consultant are included within the concept
of "cost of repairs" the Council concurs' with condition 2 of the
letter.
Inasmuch as the City will be determining when the work has been
completed to its satisfaction as outlined under item 2 above, we
see no objections to assuming responsibilities with regard to
further subsidence in this particular section of Red Hill Avenue
following completion of the repair project.
C.1TY IiA111. 140 W)•:ST F: I:r,pt: P STI:F:F.T Ti.'S4' I '; CAI.IFr!I \IA 0 :6S9 (ilt) .i :4-SS°V
Arrenda Item #14 S-1 District 7
Page. 2
Board .of Directors, Sanitation District V
9/1-6/71
With reference to item 4 of Mr. Nisson 's letter, the City will
most certainly notify the Sanitation District when we are planning
any center island construction activities within 10 feet of any
of the District's trunk facilities . It should be. made clear, however,
that the City does not intend to abandon its plans concerning the
.future construction of center islands in streets which may contain
District facilities .
With regard to item 5, we would certainly not expect the Sanitation
District to admit liability for any subsidence which has not as _
yet occurred in any part of Red Hill or any other street within
the City. In a similar manner, the City of Tustin does not admit
liability for any future subsidence which may occur over District
facilities . Quite obviously, any future subsidence within Red Hill
or any other street must be evaluated on the basis of its own merits
and causes and responsibility resolved at such time as any additional
subsidence may occur.
With the understandings as outlined above with regard to Mr. Nisson's
letter, the City concurs with the District Counsel 's letter of
August 25 , 1971, and again we wish to express our appreciation to
the Board for your cooperation with regard to this matter.
Very truly yours, '
A. J. Coco
Mayor.
Attachments
. AJC/dh _
-Agenda Item 1.14 8-2 District 7-
i
ACTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF• THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin,
California was held Monday , August. 16 , 1971
at 7 :30 P.M.
Present: Councilmen Coco, C. 'Miller, Marsters, L. Miller, Oster
Absent: Councilmen — None
Subject: Construction of Center Islands on Red Hill Avenue .
North of Bryan Avenue.
M. O.
"Moved and seconded that expenditure of $10,000 (of County Sanitation ,
District 7's Main Trunk Fund held in trust by the City) be authorized
for the purpose of correcting soil conditions on Red Hill Avenue.
Carried unanimously."
Meeting adjourned to Monday, August 23, 1971, 6:30 P. M. , in the City Hall
Conference Room.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS,
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, Ruth C. Poe, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City
Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify
the foregoing to be the official action taken by the City
Council at the above meeting.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this
14th day o-f September , 1971
RUTH C. POE
City Clerk & ex-officio Clerk of
the City Council .
-Agenda Item4 g.:3 District 7
LAW OFFICES or
JACK J. BIDLEL $IMEL. HARV= & LOGAN
714-547-7395
JOHN A. IIARVEY, IlI Y'OL'ttTF1. FLOOR
RICHARD N. RINLEL 1010 NORTIT NLAT\ STREET
GEORGE 0. LOGAN SANT'A ANA,CALIFORXIA 92701 i
JOHN A. BERGEN
September 2, 1971
Mr. Fred Harper, General Manager
County Sanitation District No. 7
P. O. Box 5175 .
Fountain Valley, CA 92708 _
Dear Fred:
Re: Proposed Assessment District No. 9
Mr. C. Arthur Nisson, Jr, and I are advised that District No. 7-intends
to commence another sewer assessment district to be known as Assessment
District No. 9, and that there is a possibility that the total construction cost
would be so low that 2-1/2% of the total construction cost would not-amount
to the sum of $1, 000, which is the minimum on the percentage fee for legal
services as established by your District's Resolution No. 63-57-7, adopted
. April 16, 1963. In that resolution, Mr. Nisson and the undersigned were
employed to perform all of the legal services in all assessment district
projects commenced by District No. 7.
The total construction cost would have to exceed $40, 000 to realize a fee of
$1, 000 at the 2--1/2% rate now established by resolution. Since there is a
possibility that the total construction cost might not exceed $40, 000, you
and the Board of Directors of District 7 are advised as follows:
Mr. Nisson and I have discussed this matter and we are agreeable and do
hereby advise. your Board that for the purposes of your proposed Sewer
Assessment District No. 9, the $1, 000 minimum fee as set forth in Section 2
of said resolution will be modified and reduced to a minimum fee of not less
than $750. 00 for the ordinary services therein described. This minimum fee
arrangement will become important only if the 2-1/2% of actual construction
cost produces a figure less than $750. 00. Our percentage fee, then, would be
2-1/276 of actual construction cost with a minimum of $750'. 00. All of the
other provisions of said Resolution No. 63-57-7 pertaining to fees will remain
the same with the exception that Mr. Nisson now receives $45. 00 per hour and
$250. 00 per diem for his work in the acquisition of easements.
Very truly yours,
�..' C. M-bur Nisson, Jr, and,
Jack J. Rimel /
. B
y .r l
JJR/jc Jack•J.--Rimel
cc: Mr. Nisson /
.Agenda Item #15 -T- District 7
Q .
Agenda Item No._ �y•r__,
L
August 3, 1971
County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92.708
Attention: Mr. Ray Lewis
Re: Tentative Tract No. 7339,
County of Orange
Dear Sir:
Pursuant to procedure established for said district we hereby
request the following described property be annexed to County
Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County:
see attached legal description
The property 1s a part of the Estate of Marion E. Jones,
deceased. The executrix of said estate is Marldayle Thompson
Peay.
The assessed value of the real property contained in the estate
of 37.204 acres is $83,790.00, or $2,252. 18 per acre. Based
upon this ratio of assessed value to land area, the assessed
value of subject property is $22,974.49
. The property is uninhabitated.
I enclose herewith a cashiers check payable to the district
to cover processing costs.
Yours very truly,
i
Marldayle Thompson Peay r�
Executrix of the Estate of
Marion E. Jones, deceased
Agenda Item #,'17 .-U— District 7
August 16, 1971
County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
P -1, Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention: Mr. Ray Lewis
Re: Petition for annexation of property of Marion E. Jones
Estate (amended)
County of Orange
Dear Sir: .
Pursuant to procedure established for said district -we hereby
request the following described property be annexed to County
Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County,
SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION!
The property is a part of the Estate of Marion E. Jones,
deceased. The executrix of said .estate is Maridayle Thompson
Peay.
The assessed value of the real property contained in the estate
of 37.204 acres is $83,790.00, or $2,252. 18 per acre. -
The property is uninhabitated.
Please apply the cashiers check submitted with earlier petition,
dated August 3, 1971 , to this amended petition.
Yours very truly,
Maridayle Thompson Peay
Esecutrix of the Estate of
Marion E. Jones, deceased
Agenda Item #17 —V_ District 7
P.O. DOX 449
300 EAST CHAPMAN AVENUE p_
TELEPHONE 633.2300 -z"7t•
ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92666 �.`i '-_-_ I ;• i l ' ( r ~
114
-
1 ,
September 22 1971
Board of Directors
Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P. 0. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Gentlemen:
This letter is in reference to the problem referred by your
Board to the Orange City Council concerning the sanitary sewers serv-
ing the areas north of Chapman Avenue and east of Santiago Boulevard.
Since 1966, it has been the policy of the City of Orange to
maintain low density in this area. This is indicated in the report
entitled "Master Plan of Trunk Sewer Facilities for County Sanitation
District No. 7," prepared by Boyle Engineering and dated May 1969.
(See Page S, Item 3.)
The Orange Unified School District has also made its plan with
regard to the construction and location of school facilities based
on a density as desired by the City in its sphere of influence.
The City of Orange has an up-to-date General Plan of the City
and the East Orange area, and public hearings on this will commence
in *the next few weeks.
At the adjourned meeting of the Orange City Council on September 21,
1971, a motion was adopted that it be the policy of the City of Orange
that the subject area be maintained with a density approximating that
of R-1-8000 square feet.
It is recommended that your Honorable -Body take this into consider-
ation in making any decision relative tosanitary sewers in the area.
Sincerely,
. Don E. Smith
Mayor
DES:MMc
1
INCORPORATED APRIL 6. 1860
Agenda Item # 17 W-1 District 7
P
1
' TO: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF 01�r-'-.GE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
ATTN: FRED A. HARMER, GENERAL MANAGER
P. 0. Box. 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFOrum 92708
An excerpt from the minutes of an adjourned regular Meeting of the
City Council, City of Orange, California, held September 21, 1971.
Its RE REPORT Oil SANITARY SEWER COiv1ECiI0►i AT QL ,iAii AVENUE t1,vD
SANTIAGO BOULEVARD:
Mayor Smith, reported on a request from the County pf Orange
Sanitation District for Council.'s opinion on density for the ;
general area north of Chap-man Avenue and east of Santiago
Boulevard outside the City of Orange.
Moved by Councilman E(ileman, seconded by Councilman Hoyt, and
duly adopted, that in ans:.,er to the Sanitation District's
request, that 'if this senera•l. area were in the City of Orange
our general policy would be that the density factor should not
be greater than 8,000 square feet.
Dated -this 22nd day of September, 1971.
EMILY L. WILSON
City Clerk and ex-officio
clerk of the Council
by' Barbara L. Sack, Deputy
-Agenda Item #17 W-2 District 7
0,R1
ALLARD, $H ELTON & O�CON NOR
ATTORNEYS AT LAW fVJr�
160 POMONA MALL WEST, SIXTK FLOOR '
LEONARD A;SHELTON -POMONA. CALIFORNIA 91766 JOSEPH A.ALLARD
MAURICE'O'CONNOR
R.CRAIG MCMANIGAL (714) 622-1041 AND (213) 964.2393 (1687-1968)
EUGENE J.AXELROO
FERDINAND F. FERNANDEZ
THOMAS C.13RAYTON
PAUL M. MAHONEY
TERRENCE J.BRUTOCAO
September 17 , 1971
Directors, Sanitation District
No. 7 of Orange County P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Gentlemen:
Our firm prepared the Federal Estate Tax return for the estate
of Marion E. Jones , deceased, and we are now involved in matters
relative to the audit of that return, and payment. of the tax,
which payment has been deferred.
We have also been in charge of efforts to sell the land which' is
the principal asset of the estate, and which we seek to annex to
your district. A hearing on the annexation is set for September
30, 1971.
The value of the estate is in the neighborhood of $1 ,000 ,000.00 ,
and its principal asset is the land which seeks annexation to
your district. Without the sale of that land it is not possible
to pay the Federal Estate Tax and the California Inheritance Tax.
Nothing has yet been paid on the Federal Estate Tax.
Over a year ago we commenced proceedings to sell the land, and
have faced 'many unexpected delays. It is hoped that we are on
the verge of making the sale, which is of extreme importance to
the estate. I hope that you will do whatever you can to avoid
any further delay. If we were to lose this sale, we have no
other sale in prospect, and the estate' might suffer very heavy
loss.
We would appreciate anything you can do to assure prompt annex-
ation of the land to your district and whatever else is required
of you in order to allow us to close our- escrow.
Yours truly,}
L. A. Shelton
of
ALLARD, SHELTON & O'CONNOR
Agenda Item #18 -X- District 7
nor-yada land co.
869-C East Foothill Blvd.
Upland, California 91786
Telephone 714/985-7281
September 16, 1971
Honorable Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County_
Post Office Box 8127 _
Fountain Valley, California
Re: Tentative Tract No. 73890
Marion E. Jones Estate
Gentlemen:
We are the developers of the above referenced project and have
been advised by our representative, Evans 8 Associates, Inc.,
that the Board did not take affirmative action on the petition
for annexation of the Jones Estate at its regular meeting of
September 8, 1971 , but held this matter over for consideration
at an adjourned meeting to be held on September 30, 1971 ,
It Is our understanding that one of the points in question is
the method of serving the first increment of development,
Tentative Tract No. 7389, being approximately 10 acres in area and
located in the southeasterly corner of the property of the
estate. It is our further understanding that although the sewer
system within this unit could be drained to the west, outletting
Into the main in Santiago Boulevard, it is the recommendation of
your engineering staff that this area be served by draining to
the south into a prODosed sub-trunk sewer line in Chapman Avenue.
As the time of construction of this line is indefinite and since
It Is imperative that we record and commence development of
Tract No. 7389, at the earliest possible date, we hereby offer
to construct a portion of the Master Plan Sub-trunk Sewer Line
In Chapman Avenue, between Santiago Boulevard and Crawford Canyon
Road. This offer is conditioned upon entering into a contract
with the District for reimbursement of the costs of construction
of the sewer line in accordance with previously established '
procedures of the District from funds available for this purpose.
-Agenda Item #19 Y-1 District 7
Vie enclose herewith a sketch showing approximate location and
limits of construction of this line.
We will appreciate your consideration and approval of this
offer and your affirmative action on the petition for annex-
ation of the Jones Estate.
Yours very truly,
NOR-VADA LAND COMPANY
R. T. Hebard
President
RTH:*d,j b
Encl .
Agenda Item #_19 Y-2 District 7
ct
,a�:-ti�-tea s�
k
Ty7 7Y.7.r
A Pp
^" I Sewc
•, ,•;--y. I „- ,,, ^ _ � 't Z �„� � �,•�.! Cvnnccfion fvr- Tr: '
7389
14
• � � �w ! � � Fufui e �x�ension � •
• � �� i 1---�---`�P.�•�.ti'�� C� ,3:.�,c y! L;.�t _ � \L I� o�'Sci6-Trunk. •
r Nor m00% Land 60-
/V / V
i0✓v
d Skefch may: cy410MA/V QVFV&�g' MASrE,e ,P/.QN SLIa-r,PUIV4�
ct
E�.a�vs�Q ssociA rE's �iVO SEwE,P IO2OPOY�- SY MOR, k140A L AND CO.
/S43 vY G'ol-vcy Ave.
ct GI/esf Co vino Ca/
2113-96.7--40B/ Se of /6, 1971
?'eeting, Date d Time V 0 Districts
DIGTPICT 1 <�� � _ ( �, JOINT BURROS
--� Just Harper
Griset V1, Herrin ✓ ✓ Berton Westra
Miller ✓ Coco Christie Root
Porter y ✓ ✓ Clark Jackson
Bat t=ln. V ✓ Coen
Cul ve r
DISTRICT 2 Davis Fonte
Finnell Gomez
Smith Hileman Green McCracken
'].sti e Root Griset Herrin
Z`t'ark Jac?1:son Harper Just
Culver Harvey , Kanel
Finnell Gomez _ Hemeon Lewis
Herrin Griset Herrin- Griset
Just Harper Hirth Croul
SLi ms Zuniga Holden Hogard
Stephenson Dutton Hyde Kroesen
Wedaa Machado McInnis Hirth
Zinn �:chni epp McWhinney
Battin_ Miller Coco
Parsons
DISTRICT 3 Porter
Rogers Hirth
Bez•ton W S;est ie "estra Shipley McCracken
Sims Zuniga
Christie -Root Smith Hileman
Clark Jackson Smith
Dutton
Culver Wedaa 'Machado
Davis �'onte Green I Winn Schnie
cCracken pp
Harper Just Battin
Harvey Kanel
Ilerrin Griset
Hemeon Lewis
Mitchell
Holden Hogard Boyd Goldberg
lninney
b�ns Zuniga
Stephenson Dutton_ OTHI;I'LS
Battin
• "— Harper V
DIST ECT 5 Brot•m
Parsons Sylvester
•
Hirth Croul Lewis vDunn
Battin
Clarke v
DISTRICT 6 Sigler
Porter ,� Crabb
lcli:inis Hirth
Battin Carlson ✓
( r ° Finster
DIST -ICT 1 0) 6 a-� ` �/' _ 2 Gallot-ray —"
=r ✓ Coco ✓ ✓ ��" Hohener
`� ✓
Herrin ✓ ✓ HuntGr�.set .-� KeithPorter ✓ V, ✓ ✓
Rogers Huth ✓ ✓ j' �° Lowry
Smith ✓ Hile::lan ✓ ✓ / iladdox
Battin �r � !•lard ns on
Ilisson ✓
D:LSrf p,_l(;T 11 Piersall
S�pley McCracken , S even.
.n ��
3�attin
DISTRICT
B y Goldberg
i•i i t,c hell
Battin
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 35 55 6, 7 anJ 11,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos . 1, 25 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange
County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m. ,
September 8 , 19 71 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain
Valley, California .
The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called
the meeting to order at 7:30 p.n.
The roll was called and the Secretary reporte,' a quorum
present for each District' s Board .
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, be adjourned
to September 30, 1971 at 5:00 p.m. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 9:00 p.m. , September 8, 1971.
�.d
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SS
COUNTY OF ORANGE
I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the
Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos .
1, 2, 3, F, F, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
to hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full,
true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of
said Boards of Directors on the 8th day of September ,
19 71
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hav;nty
unto set my hand this
8th ,9ay Of September, 1971
rd
,� the Boar('s of Directors
f C anitation Districts Nos .
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11
5-107
a
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos . 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange
�...✓ County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m. ,
September 8 , 19 71 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain
Valley, California .
The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called
the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
The roll was called and the Secretary reporteA a quorum
present for each District' s Board .
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, be adjourned
to September 30, 1971 at 5:00 p.m. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 7:52 p.m. September 8, 1971.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SS
COUNTY OF ORANGE
I, J . WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the
Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos .
1, 2, 3, F, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
to hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full,
true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of
said Boards of Directors on the 8th day of September
19 71 -
IN WITN S-3rHERE017 -I have hereunto set my hand this
8th day Of- Se-tembez',--_l4C0un;tySa
he Boa ('s of Directors
of itation Districts Nos .
13 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11
S-107
Agenda Item No.�
1 FORM OF MINUTES
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
2 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9
3 September 30, 1971
co i O.Q CQ_{n1.e v 5,141 k
4 The Secretary advised the Board that there had heretofore4been filed
5 with the Board a petition by property owners under the provisions of Section
6 2804 of the Streets and Highways Code, requesting the formation of an
7 assessment district under the 1911 Act to construct sanitary sewers and
8 appurtenances and appurtenant work in proposed "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
9 NO. 9" and requesting the Board to waive further proceedings under the
10 "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of
11 1931. " He further advised the Boar�d�t�at t�ere was on file a letter from the
12 Engineer of Work, Boyle Engineering; stating that said petition had been
.13 checked as to ownership and that the petition represented owners of more
14 than ninety per cent (9076) of the area of the property to benefit by the pro-
15 posed improvement. There was then presented to the Board for its con-
16 sideration a resolution numbered RESOLUTION NO.71—,10-1 entitled:
17 "A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
18 COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO THE
PROVISIONS OF SECTION 2804 OF THE STREETS AND
19 HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN THE
MATTER OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY
20 SEWERS AND APPURTENANCES AND APPURTENANT WORK
IN A PORTION OF SAID SANITATION DISTRICT TO BE KNOWN
21 AS 'ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9' OF SAID SANITATION
DISTRICT. "
22
23 It was moved by Director that said resolution be adopted and
24 said motion was seconded by Directorl� and carried by the fol-
25 lowing roll call vote:
26 AYES: Directors
27 NOES: Directors
28 ABSENT: Directors
29 nq _
30 Edwin H. Finster of Boyle Engineering, the Engineer of Work for
31 proposed "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9, " presented] to the Board of
32 Directors for its consideration and approval the Plans for said proposed
LAW OFFICES OF
RIMEL. HARVEY &
LOGAN
FOURTH FLOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN ST. -
SANTA ANA, '
CALIFORNIA 92701
II
1 work and improvement, entitled "Construction Plans for the Sanitary Sewer
2 System in Assessment District No. 9, County Sanitation District No: 7 of
3 Orange County, California, 1T dated August, 197.1, consisting of 4 sheets,
4 numbered 1 to 4, inclusive. Director &L moved that said
5 Plans be approved, received and filed, and said motion was seconded by
6 Director o and carried by the following roll call vote:
7 AYES: Directors
8 NOES: Directors
9 ABSENT: Directors
10 's,
11 Mr. Finste next submitted to the Board of.Directors for its consider
12 ation and approval the Specifications for said proposed "ASSESSMENT DIS-
13 TRICT NO. 9, 1 consisting of "General Provisions, 11 "Standard Specifications:
14 and "Detailed Specifications, it Director �)�_' moved that said
15 Specifications e approved, received and filed, and•said motion was seconded
16 by Director and carried by the following roll call vote:
17 AYES: Directors
18 NOES: Directors
19 ABSENT: Directors
20
21 Mr. Finster then submitted to the Board for its consideration and
22 approval the Diagram or Plat of-the proposed "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
23 NO, 9, " entitled "Proposed Boundaries of Assessment District No. 9,
24 County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, Calif. , " dated August,
25 1971, consisting of one sheet. Director moved that said
26 Diagram or Plat be approved, received and filed, and said motion was
27 seconded by Director and carried by the following roll
28 call vote:
`.Moll 29 AYES: Directors
30 NOES: Directors
31 ABSENT: Directors
32
LAW OFFICES OF
RIMEL• HARVEY &
L0GAN
FOURTH FLOOR -2-
1010 NORTH MAIN ST.
SANTA ANA,
CALIFORNIA 92701
1 Mr. Finster then offered to the Board of Directors, for its con-
2 deration and approval, the proposed Estimate of Cost for all acquisition,
3 work and improvement, including incidental expenses there f, for said
4 proposed "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9. " Director
5 moved that said Estimate of Cost be approved, Feceived and filed, and
6 said motion was seconded by Director tl"zJand carried by
7 the following roll call vote:
8 AYES: Directors
9 NOES: Directors
10 ABSENT: Directors
11
12 The Secretary then advised the Board that a resolution had been
13 received from the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, numbere
14 RESOLUTION NO.. consenting to the construction of nitary
15 sewers and appurtenances in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. " Said
16 resolution was received and filed.
17
18 The Manager then offered to the Board for is consideration a
19 , proposed Resolution of Intention to be number RESOLUTION OF INTENTIO
20 NO. entitled as follows:
21 "A RESOLUTION OF THE BOA OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTR T NO. 7 OF ORANGE
22 COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, D LA RING ITS INTENTION TO
ORDER THE CONSTRUCT N OF SANITARY SEWERS AND
23 APPURTENANCES AND PPURTENANT WORK IN 'ASSESS-
MENT DISTRICT NO. IN SAID SANITATION DISTRICT;
24 DECLARING ITS INT NTION TO ORDER THE ACQUISITION
OF CERTAIN LAN RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS
25 NECESSARY IN NNECTION WITH SAID WORK AND
IMPROVEMEN AND TO ASSESS THE COSTS OF SAID ACQUISI-
26 TION, tNCLU ING THE INCIDENTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES
THEREOF, S PART OF THE COST OF SAID WORK AND
27 IMPROVE ENT; DECLARING THE ACQUISITION OF SAID
LANDS, GHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS AND THE WORK
28 AND I PROVEMENT 'TO BE OF MORE THAN LOCAL OR
ORD ARY PUBLIC BENEFITAND DESCRIBING THE DISTRICT
29 T BE BENEFITED BY SAID ACQUISITION, WORK AND IMPROVE-
NT AND TO PAY THE COSTS AND EXPENSES THEREOF; FIX-
30 NG THE TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OF OBJECTIONS TO SAIE
ACQUISITION, WORK AND IMPROVEMENT. "
31 ,
32
LAW OFFICES OF
RIMEL. HARVEY & �
LOGAN
FOURTH FLOOR - -3-
1010 NORTH MAIN ST.
SANTA ANA.
CALIFORNIA 92701
1 le
2 as the moved by Director that said
3 RESOLUTION OF NTION NO, be adopted, .and said motion
4 was seconded by Director and carried by the following
5 roll call vote:
6 AYES: Directors
7 NOES: Directors
8 ,
9 -
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
LAW OFFICES OF
RIMEL. HARVEY&
LOGAN _4
FOURTH FLOOR '
1010 NORTH MAIN ST.
SANTA ANA.
CALIFORNIA 92701 l�
9OV9
ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS
ENGINEERING
412 SOUTH LYON STREET SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHONE 1 714) 547-4471
ADDRESS REPLY TO P.O. BOX 176
September 30, 1971
Dnaru of directors
County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92700
Gentlemen:
A copy of the letter dated September 17, 1971 addressed to Mr, Ray E. Lewis -
Engineer, from C. R. Wolven, has been submitted to this office for review and
comment.
The last sentence of the second paragraph alleges that "Boyle Engineering assured
us there should be no problems as far as the sanitary sevreis vrerc concerned, as
there was an existing trunk iire in Santiago Blvd. w,th sufficient capacity to
service the property, " P.)y!e Engineering denies his ailegariun.
Because of many years of experience as consultant to various public agencies;
Doyle Engineering is ocuteiy a,•,^-e of its relation to the policy determining body
of an agency such as Sanitakiori District No. 7 and to coiner members of the agency's
staff. Our staff rigidly follows a poi icy of not encroaching upon the prerogatives
of the gove►-ning bony. The allegation is made that t'riis office gave assurances
which in fact could crly be given by final determinat'son of the directors.
It is commoi, for persons requesting engineering data to contact this office directly
or to be referred to this office by your staff. It is our long standing policy to give
only general data concerning district boundaries, facilities,, or related engineering
matters and to refer mcf;ors of policy to your staff. In the instance of this letter,
no one in our office can ra-rill o specific conversation wita Mr. Wolven. We do
not record all cor.versaiions and have no means of verifying his contact with this
office. Because we do receive man,./ calls of this nature, it is probable that infor-
mation on sewers in ;he area was requested and given from time to rime to vas ions
lnd;viduds.
One specific call to this office several months rate- is rc celled by Mi.. Carl Carlson.
M engineer \':ifh Frans & Associutes; engineers for :i.; ceveioper of the propeity
in question, requested specific: data about c--:nexatir,i- -if the pror rty.
In accor4once with our iooq term policy, Mr. "rlson referre0 file caller 10 i'he
sanitation district skiff.
P R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E R I N G A N D ARCH ITECTU RAL S E R V I C E S
Roard of [Directors
County Sanitation District No. 7
u{ (Dianne County
September 30, 1971
Pag e 2
To date, we have nct been requested by your staff to os;ist in plan checking or
other investigations concerning the subject area. Some months ago you adopted
a policy that this aMcc would provide services only when specifically authorized.
This policy has been observed.
Respectfully submitted,
BOYLE ENGINEERING
6
Conrad Hohener, Jr., C. E. 10951
ps
B-007-001-00
BOY L E E N G IN E E R ING
C17V OF ORANGE CIVIC CENTER
P.O. BOX 449 `
300 EAST CHAPMAN AVENUE
TELEPHONE 633-2300
ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92666
September 30, 1971
Board of Directors
Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P. 0. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Gentlemen:
In order that your Board may be aware of the City
of Orange's plans for the construction of the sanitary
sewer on East Chapman Avenue from Solano to a point
approximately 3,000 feet easterly, the following time
schedule has been developed and is our best estimate of
the timing for the construction of this project. One
consideration must be kept in mind; which is that nego-
tiations to obtain portions of the right-of-way may
tend to accelerate or delay this schedule:
Field survey completed October 15, 1971.
Plans and specifications completed November 26, 1971.
Right-of-way acquired and advertised bids December 1, 1971.
Award of contract December 28, 1971.
Construction begins January 10, 1971.
Construction completed March 1, 1972.
Yours truly,
�i'
Q /
.� )"j
Don E. Smith
Mayor
DES:MMc
CC: Fonley, Johnson, Evans, Roberts
INCORPORATED APRIL S. 1888
t
I
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS , A ELE PH ONES:
£A CODE 714
S40OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA �, 962 241101
P. ❑. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
1OB44 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
September 22, 1971
TO: ME14BERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUTITY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1 AND 7
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to adjournir-ent of the regular meeting held September 8,
1971, the .Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts No.S .
1 and 7 will. meet in an adjourned .regular meeting:
Thursday, September 30, 1971
at 5:00 p.m.
10344 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
i
EXECUTIVE COMITTEE - September 30th at 6:00 p.m.
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts P.O. sox 5i75
10844 Ellis Avenue
OF Orange County, California Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 714
540-2910
�- DISTRICT NO. w - • 962-2411
II September 22 1
P � 971
Adjourned Regular MeetinS
Thursday, September 30, 1971
5 :00 P.M.
The following is a brief explanation of the items appearing on
the enclosed agenda for this joint meeting.
District No. 1
No. 5 - APPROVAL OF ADDENDA FOR JOBS NO. J-7-2 AND J-12 : Bids for
this contract, for the construction of Administrative-Engineering
Building Addition and Vehicle Maintenance Facilities., were opened
on September 21. During the course of the bidding, it was necessary
to prepare two addenda on each. job in o2•der to clarify technical
points . Approval of the addenda is recommended.
No, 6 - AI-TA-2D OF JOBS NO. J-7-2 AND J-12 : As mentioned, bids for
these new building facilities were opened on September 21 with
considerable interest by contractors, a::, the bid tabulation attached
to the agenda material will show. The low bid was submitted by
B. H. Miller Construction Company, of I%Tei:.,port Beach, in the amount
of $477,500 for both facilities ttnd, accordingly, it is recommended
that the award be made to this firm for these two jobs under one
contract. This lo;v bid is slightly above (approximately �20,000)
the architect 's estimate for both jobs combined.
No. 7 - At-JARD OF CONTRACT FOR INTERPLAIINIT INFLUENT INTERCEPTOR, JOB
N0. 1-8: The Joint Boardc authorized iistrict No. 1 to award this
contract to the successful bidder, Kordick and Rados, upon approval
by the General Counsel with regard to right of way in Brookhurst
Street. Technically, the State and Federal Grant regulations provide
that the Districts should not award this contract until approved by
the State 1Jater Resources Control Board and the T'nvironmental Protection
Agency. We are hopeful that such approval will be received prior to
the meeting.
No. 8 - AWARD OF CONTRACT, JOB NO. P2-11-1: Bids for this job,
Headworks "C" Expansion at Plant No. 2, were opened on September 1
with a total of five contractors submitting bids. As can be seen
from the bid tabulation included with the agenda material, the bidding
`.s
was fairly close and although the low bid exceeds the engineer ' s esti-
mate by $28,000, it is obvious that the bidding reflects the true
cost of construction. The staff recommends award to E.T. I. & Kordick,
a joint venture, the low bidder, in the amount of .$1,228,000. It may
be interesting to note that Kordick was also the low bidder on Job
No. I-8, in a joint venture with Steve P. ' Rados, Inc . , and that he is
also the low bidder as a joint venture with E.T. I. on this project.
The Kordick firm has done work for the Districts in the past and we
consider them excellent contractors.
District No. 7
No. 9 - ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO CONTRACT NO. 7-6-3: During the bidding on
this contract, bids for which were opened on September 21, it was
necessary to issue an addendum correcting typographical and plan
errors. We recommend approval of the addendum, a copy of which is
included in the agenda material.
No. 10 - AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. 7-6-3: Bids for this job, the Sunflower
Interceptor, Reach 3, and the Red Hill Interceptor, Reaches 4 and 5,
and which was described in a previous agenda report, were opened on
September 21. As can be seen from the bid tabulation included with
the agenda material, bidding was excellent and competitive, although
the low bidder 's proposal wa-s approximately $64,000 over the engineer ' s
estimate. The staff recommends award to Colich Construction Company
at their low bid of $1,060,422.58 for this urgently needed facility.
The remaining contract (No. 7-6-4) is now out for bid with an
engineer's estimate of $578,000. Bids will be taken on October 19,
with award scheduled at an adjourned meeting in October on the
NEW meeting date of the Executive Committee .
In spite of the higher than expected bid on this project, the
Director of Finance advises that if this next contract is awarded at
a figure approximating the above estimate, the total cost of these
two sewers will be approximately $216,000 less than budgeted.
No. 11 - ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING PROPOSAI,: The Directors will
recall that the Board on August 24 declared its intent to enter into
a Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement with the Irvine Industrial
Complex for additional master plan facilities and authorized me to
direct the engineers to prepare plans and specifications for the
facilities in question. Accordingly, we have solicited a proposal
from the District ' s engineers for the design work, a copy of which
is included in the agenda material. We recommend acceptance of the
proposal and authorization to the engineers to proceed.
No. 12 - REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF CONNECTION CHARGES: A letter
on this subject from the engineers for Calvary Chapel is included
with the agenda material. The staff recommends that the requested
connection charge modification be denied as contrary to the provisions
of the District 's connection charge ordinance.
-2-
No. 13 - SUBSIDENCE PROBLEM ON RED HILL AVENUE: This matter has been
thoroughly discussed at previous Board meetings and on August 24 the
Board directed the General Counsel to prepare an agreement with the
City of Tustin for correction of the subsidence problem in accordance
with the terms formally approved by the Board. Included with the
agenda material is the General Counsel's letter to the City of Tustin
and the City's reply of September 16, 1971. It is obvious that the
City does not agree completely with the terms recommended by the Board
but we believe the matter can be worked out to the satisfaction of the
respective attorneys and staffs. Under this item, there will be a
brief staff report on engineering discussions with the City of
Tustin 's staff. In accordance with the Board authorization given at
the August 24 meeting, the repair work to be conducted by the District
can proceed even though the final agreement between the City of Tustin
and the District has not been executed.
No. 14 - PROPOSAL OF ATTORNEYS FOR LEGAL SERVICES FOR ASSESS14ENT
DISTRICT NO. 9 : Included with the agenda material is a proposal,
dated September 2, from C. Arthur Nisson and Jack J. Rimel for the
necessary legal services for this small assessment district. We
recommend acceptance of the proposal.
No. 15 - ACTIONS CONCERNING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9 : The various
reports, motions and resolutions included in the agenda material or
to be distributed at the meeting, are routine and self-explanatory .
No. 16 - FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF PETITION FOR ANNEXATION OF TENTA-
TIVE TRACT NO. 7389 : Included with the agenda material under this
item are the original and amended petitions of the proponents and
a letter dated September 22 front the City of Orange reporting on the
ROW City' s position on this subject as requested by the Board at the
regular meeting on September 8.
No. 17 - LETTER FROM ATTORflTEYS FOR ESTATE OF MARION E. JONES:
Included with the agenda material is a letter dated September 17,
1971, relative to the proposed annexation described in the preceding
item.
No. 18 - PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MASTER PLAN SUBTRUNK SEWER IN
CHAP1,1AN AVLTTUE: Included in the agenda material is a letter on this
subject from the Nor-Vada Land Company. This matter relates to the
proposed annexation described under Item No. 16.
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
-3-