Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971-09-30 1 � r BOARDS OF DIRECTORS I County Sanitation Districts P. o. Box 5175 or Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 !fit QTPIrT Nr-t 1 - 7 II ----- AGENDA v Adjourned Regular Meeting A1)11URN6IENTS.,,,,, . September `8,7, 1971 - 5:00 p.m. co;,;r & MILEAGE.... 30 FILES SET UP•.„ �1.) Roll Call RESOLUTIONS CERTIFIED LETTERS WRITTEN.•• (2) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary MINUTES WRITTE'N,,,�.� MINUTES FILED .' L% (3) Report of the General Manager �4) Report of the General Counsel (5) DISTRICT 1 Consi6era.tion of motion to receive and file letter from Environmental Protection Agency approving award of contracts for 1970-71 Improvements (WPC-CAL-573) . See page A ll (6) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications for Administration-Engineering Building Addition, Job No. J-7-2 and Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications for Vehicle Maintenance V Facilities, Job No. J-12. See pages "B11 "D" and "E" (7) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of Resolution No. 71-118-1, to receive and file bld tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contrac for Administrations-Engineering Building Addition, Job 'No. J-7-2 V and Vehicle maintenance Facilities, Job No. J-12 to B. H. Miller Construction Co. in the amount of $477, 500.00. See pages "F" and 11G?' (8) DISTRICT 1 ,1onsideration of Resolution No. 71-119-1, to receive and file recommendation of Counsel.,,e GeneraCounsel.,, awardingand awarding contract for Interplant Influent Tnterceptor, Job No. T._9 to Kordick & Rados, a. joint venture of Kordick & Sons, �1 Inc. , Baldwin Park, and Steve P. Rados, Inc. , i`:onrovia, in the amount of $6,387,511. 00. See pages "H" and "J" DISTRICT 1 Consideration of Resolution No. 71-120-1, to receive and file tabulat'i cn andrecommendation, and awardinb contract LS for Ileadworks "C" Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-11-1,v to E.T.I. & Kordick., a joint venture of Environmental �A? Tectonics, Inc. , Anaheim, and Kordick & Sons, Inc. , Baldwin t. Park, in the amount of $1,228,000. 00. See pages "K" a-rid "L 1' (10) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the / plans and specifications for Sunflower Interceptor, Reach v 3 ?nd '?red Trill Inte-centor, Reaches 4 and P1o. 7-6-3. See page - 11M" V (11) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 71-121-7, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding ` contract for Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 3 and Red Hill Interceptor, Reaches 4 and 5, Contract No. 7-6-3 to Colich Construction Co. , in the amount of $1,060,422.58. See pages "N" and "Olt (12) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion accepting proposal of Boyle Engineering, dated September 14, 1971, for engineering services in connection with preparation of plans and specifications for McGaw Avenue Subtrunk, Portion of Reach 49 and Jamboree Road Subtrunk No. 2, Reach 52, for a lump sum fee of $3,200. See page "P" L� (13) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file letter �! from Hall & Foreman, Inc. , dated September 10, 1971, requesting modification of the connection charge for the Calvary Chapel to be located at the northwest corner of Fairview and Sunflower Avenues in the City of Santa < <X Ana; atld to derby said request as contrary to �1 i ,I the provisions and administrative procedures of Ordinance 711, as amended. See page " p" DISTRICT 7 Report of staff re subsidence problem on Redhill Avenue between Bryan and First Street in Tustin, and consideration of motion to receive and file letter of General Counsel �. to City of Tustin, dated August 25, 1971,- and reply of City ( of Tustin, dated September 16, 1971, and directing General �./ ✓� Counsel to proceed with preparation of agreement after consultation with City Attorney for City of Tustin. See pages " ,' and 'S " (15) DISTRICT 7 ^ � Consideration of motion to accept proposal of C. Arthur Nisson and Jack J. Rimel, dated September 2, 1971, relative to performing legal services in connection with proposed Assessment District No. 9, for a minimum fee of $750.00. V See page 'T " (16 ) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of actions on proposed Assessment District No. 9. (Proceedings may be referred to special counsel for the assessment district, if desired. Copies of resolutions will be distributed to Directors at meeting time. ) (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 71-122-7, initiating -� proceedings in Assessment District No. 9 (b) Report of Ted Finster/Carl Carlson, of Boyle Engineering, and presentation of construction }Mans for sanitary sewers for Assessment District No. 9 ''Woe c (c) Consideration of motion to approve, receive and order filed plans and specifications for Assessment District No. 9 l (d) Consideration of motion to approve, receive and order filed map of proposed boundaries for Assessment District T,io. 9 U;• (e) Consideration of motion to approve receive and order filed "Engineer' s Construction Estimate', dated Septer,,ber_�D, 1971, for Assessment District No. 9 -2- (17) DISTRICT 7 Further consideration of Petition for Annexation of- Tentative Traut No. 7389. See des rlUrr uVn �� � and rrW'r � �,���.v"' O/t��- 5/30 7/ � (18) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to 'receive :and order filed letter relative to Estate of Marion E. Jones, deceased. See page nXr.� (19) DISTRICT 7 onside ration of proposal of Nor--Vada Land Co. to construct Master Plan Subtrunk Sewer in Chapman Avenue between Santiago Boulevard and Crawford Canyon Road. See page nYn (20) DISTRICT 1 0 -her business and communications, if any '(21) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (22) DISTRICT -7 ' Other business and communications, if any (23) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn �-61 A7 OW V � y J ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY a REGION IX ,loop/ 760 MARKET STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94202 SEP 28 1971 Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Mr. Harper: Re: IIPC-CAL-573 We have reviewed the Part B of the Offer and Acceptance, together with supporting material, and find it to be satis- factory. You are authorized to award contracts to the lowest responsible bidders , in accordance with your recommendations, as follows: J. Putman Henck Sedimentation Basin "K" and Digester "K" at Plant #2 $1,164 , 540* J. E. Hoagland Sedimentation Basins L & M. & W. W. Hoagland and Digesters L & M at �.d (jt. venture) Plant #2 1,383 ,000* E. T. I & Kordick Headworks "C" Expansion (a jt. venture) at Plant #2 1,228,000* Kordick and Rados Interplant Influent (a jt. venture) Interceptor 6 ,387.,511* B. H. Miller Con- Administration-Engineering struction Co. Building Addition and Vehicle Maintenance Facilities 477,500* *All eligible for Federal participation. As soon as the construction contracts have been awarded, please send two certified copies to this office and one copy directly to the California State Water Resources Control Board. In addition, as soon as they become available, please forward the documents checked on Enclosure 1.. The attached Notification to Hiring Halls should be reproduced in the quantity desired and completed and distributed by the contractor as required. Agenda Item #5 A-1 District 1 i Page 2 Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager Since the Federal grant may not exceed 55 percent of the estimated eligible cost of the project, the grant is reduced hereby in the amount of $113 ,830 (i.e. , from $6, 897 ,000 to $6,783,170 rounded downward to the nearest $10 . ) Should you have any questions, please contact this office. Sincerely, J Director 4ir & Water Programs Division Enclosures 1. Necessary Documents 2. Notice to Hiring Halls 3. Procedure for Handling Change Orders 4. Fiscal Records to be Maintained CC: California State WRC Board John Carollo Engineers (w/encls. ) Agenda Item #5 A-2 District 1 I y ADDENDUM N0 . 1 To The SPECIFICATIONS AMD DRAWINGS For Construction of AD141NISTRATION- ENGINEERING BUILD1NIG ADDITION JOB NO . J- 7-2 For COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Prepared By WILLIAM P . FICKER , A. I . A. 550 Nevrport Center Drive Newport Beach , California 'Telephone (714) 644-1581 Date : September 10 , 1971 Th.e following changes , omissions , additions , and/or alterations. in , on , and to the drawings and specifications shall apply to proposals made for and to the various parts of the work affected thereby . - Careful note of this Addendum shall be taken by all . parties of interest so that the proper allowance may be made in all compu- tations , estimates , and contracts , and all trades affected shall be fully 'advised in the performance of the work which will be 'required of-them. -In case of conflict between drawings , specifications , and this Addendum , this Addendum shall govern . This Addendum supersedes all previous instructions , alternates , and proposed alternates pertaining to these items . SPECIFICATIONS 1 . 2-A 16 Asphalt Paving Removal : Remove that portion of asphalt paving installed under Vehicle Maintenance building contract as temporary paving . Asphalt concre-te shall be' saw cut and removed completely from site including base material . ADDENDUM NO . 1 Page 1 of 2 'Agenda Item #6 &-1 District 1 DETAILS 1 . Delete the following details : D-7 . 6 , E-7 . 6 and F-7 :6 DRAWINGS 1 ., Sheet A-5 - Door . Schedule: Door No . `38 'add notation "Existing glass to be removed an replaced with 1 /4" tempered glass . " ' 2. Sheet A-7 - Stair No 2 Section A/A-7 - Add handrail reference B-8 . 4 3 . Sheet E- 1 - Electrical : Delete existing sheet dated 8/2/81 and insert revised E- 1 sheet .dated 9/10/71. . . ADDENDUM NO . 1 Page 2 of 2 Agenda Item #6 B-2 District 1 i - 1 ADDENDUM NO . 2 . To The - SPECIFICATIONS For Construction of ADi•1INISTRATIO(;=ENGINEERING BUILDING ADDITION JOB NO . J- 7-2 For - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Prepared By WILLIAM P . FICKER , A. I . A. 550 Newport Center Drive Newport Beach , .Cal i forni a �..✓ Telephone : ( 714 ) 644- 1581 Date : September 15 , . 1971 The following changes , omissions , additions , and/or alterations in , on , and to the specifications shall apply to proposals made for and to the various parts of the work affected thereby . Careful note of this Addendum shall be taken by all parties of interest so that the proper allowance may be made in all compu- tations , estimates , and contracts , and all trades affected shall be fully advised in the performance of the work which will be required of 'them. In case of conflict between specifications and this Addendum , this Addendum shall govern . This Addendum supersedes all ' previous instructions , alternates , and proposed alternates per- taining to these items . SPECIFICATIONS 1 . Section 10-S - Toilet Accessories Add complete section ( page 1 and 2 attach.ed ) . ADDENDUM NO . 2 Page 1 of 1 . Aenda Item 6 C-1 District 1 i DIVISION 10 SPECIALTIES SECTION 10-S TOILET ACCESSORIES. 10-S 1 . GENERAL : Requirements of Division 1 apply to work of This Section . 10-S 2 . SCOPE : Provide toilet accessories as indicated and specified , complete . 10-S .3. WORK INCLUDED : Principal items of work include the f01.1ouing : ` a. Paper towel dispenser and waste receptacles . b, Toilet paper holders . c. Soap dispensers . d. Sanitary napkin dispensers . e . Sanitary napkin disposals . 10-S 4. ITEMS AND MANUFACTURE : Locate where shown on drawings ,.' as specified or as d�irected . Fasten to metal partitions with plated through bolts ; to drywall with metal grounds tapped . to receive machine screws . a . Paper 'To►•rel Dispenser and Waste Receptacle :*. Semi - recessed , stainless steel , satin finish , Bobrick B-3606 ; taro (2 ) required . b . Toilet Paper Holders : Surface mounted ,. double roll , polished aluminum finish , Bobrick B-273 ; * four (4 ) required . c. Sanitary Napkin Dispenser : Recessed , satin finish , stainless steel', Bobrick B-350 ; one ( 1 ) required . d. Sanitary Napkin Disposal : Recessed , satin finish , stainless steel , Bobrick B-354 ; one ( 1 ) required , mounted in toilet partition . - e . Soap Dispenser : Surface mounted , satin f inish , stain- Tess steel , 1 quart 8 ounce capacity ; Bbb'ri ck B-8292 liquid valve ; four ( 4 ) required . . f. Approved equals shall be as manufactured by Accessory. Specialties , Inc. , or Bradley Washfountain Company \.oJ 10-S 5 . - CLEAN-UP : Remove all rubbish , debris , surplus material and equipment .and legally dispose . of them off the premises . TOILET ACCESSORIES 10-S Page 1 'Agenda Item � C District 1 .10-5 6 . GUARANTEE : Furnish written guarantee in accordance. with . Division 1 for a period- of one (1 ) year from date of completion . TOILET ACCESSORIES 1.0-S Page 2 Y District 1 Agenda Stem �/6 C-3 i i ADDENDUM 1,10 . 1 To The SPECIFICATIONS AND 'DRAW INGS For Construction of VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY JOB NO. J- 12 - For COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Prepared By 41ILLIAM P . FICKER , A. I . A. 550 Newport Center Drive Newport Beach , California Telephone : ( 714 ) 644- 1581 Date : September 10 , 1971 The following changes , omissions , additions , and/or alterations in , on , and to the drawings and specifications shall apply to proposals made for and to the v_ariqus parts of the work affected thereby . . Careful note of this Addendum shall be taken by all parties of interest so that the proper allowance may be made in all compu- tations , estimates , and contracts , and all trades affected shall be fully advised in the performance of the work which will be . required of 'them. In case of conflict between drawings , specifications , and this Addendum , this Addendum shall govern . This Addendum supersedes all previous instructions , alternates , and proposed alternates pertaining to these items . SPECIFICATIONS 1 . Section 9-C - Ceramic Tile : Paragraph 9-C 6. Add : Wall base tile shall be coved type base to meet floor tile . ADDENDUM NO. 1 Page 1 of 2 . Agenda Item #6 D-1 District 1 DETAILS : � - 1 . Section 3 Door Details Sheet 3 . 5 - Insert 'Weer sheet . DRAM!I NGS : 1 . Sheet A-2 Floor Plan - Men ' s Room 104 - Floor finish to be ceramic tile . See Finish Schedule . 2 . Sheet P-2 Detail B/P-2 Sandtra,p : Traffic .Grate - change 18" dim. to. be 22" , change note to be 24" x 25" traffic grate . Traffic Cover - change 24 " dim. to b-e 22 " , change note to be 24 " ,x 25" traffic cover. . 3 . Sheet E- 1 - Electrical : Delete existing sheet. dated 8/21 /71 and insert revised E- 1 sheet dated 9/10/71 . Attachment PDDEEN1QUo fMg . 1 g Agenda Item #0- D-2 District 1 xaua�ta�'�rmcsevzz=iraars .�..�:sa.�.•��e:x�+n>_���:•rn-...—•ter_xa�•-sesr..:st.asvc.o.�taa,rna."aF-x-�s�aC.:..:a-a -� • i , r 1 f✓riC�-'i F�✓i v'rilai�a==ice `•fi r_,-3:• - • •._�_. �" .. ^__fi`t,^�--�1 ------... -= \� ••�''/�J r 7. tv SCALE • 1 i iRe:RIMLT�"�[A[4AJ.'a']dAflmctoubC`•SV4St i {{, DETAIL 'racr_�a.:�-. - szr�u�sz�au�sc.•••�-.�„r��--. -•. - -- - - - REVISION a T,-S,51 r: .� CHECKED i'l..tl�ls• ts�t�;a�1: •� ''s rF=d� 9"1 '�� � � -- — — i t �:.is�Jf:. i:ii2'li�Ltir2i �}.. Ii it:�:���:«J� ''�'^ '-'.�-ra• .� ri t •ns.Yrsraar-� r y 'AOnda ztem #6 D_3 District", 7 i i i ADDENDUM [10 . 2 To The SPECIFICATIONS AND •DRAWINGS For Construction of VEHICLE MAINTENAIICE FACILITY JOE PLO . J- 12 For COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORAidGC COUNTY Prepared by WILLIAM P . FICKER , A. I . A. 550 Newport Center Drive Newport Beach , California Telephone : ( 714 ) 644- 1581 Date : September 15 , 1971 The following changes , omissions , additions , and/or alterations in , on , and to the drawings and specifications shall apply to proposals made for and to the various parts of the work affected thereby. Careful note of this Addendum shall be taken by all parties of interest so that the proper allowance may be made in all compu- tations , estimates , and contracts , and all trades affected shall be fully advised in the performance of the work which will be required of them. In case of conflict between drawings , specifications , and this .- Addendum , this Addendum shall govern . This addendum supersedes all previous instructions , alternates , and proposed alternates pertaining to these items . DRAWINGS : 1 . Sheet A-3 - Door Schedule : Revise doors number 1 , 2 , 3 , 4•, and 5 •• type of material to be metal . ADDENDUM NO . 2 Page 1 of 2 Agenda Item '6 E-1 District 1 SPECIFICATIONS 1'. Sedtion 8-F - Finish Hardware Ad'd Heading No . 7 . 3 Doors #13 Exterior to Elect. Room ' 9- But.ts 179 4-1 /2 x 4-1/2 NRP. 3 Locks 351 6 Flush B'ol is 1358 3 Threshold. 198A 6. Door Holders #2 ADDENDUM -NO . 2 Page 2 of 2 Agenda Item , E_2 District- 1 B 1 D T A B U L A T 1 0 N !ix•c%iL.l UV.0 L• a Z;J UJ.J1W tPe S F� E T J-7-2. . ' 273-2 n,,J-12 "" _ DATE September 21, 71, 11 :00 a.m. > CONTRACT FOR: ADMINISTRATION - ENGINEERING BUILDING ADDITION, JOB NO. J-7-2 m & VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITIES, JOB NO. J-12 J-7-2 J-12 DEDUCT FOR H CONTFAC TOR SCHEDiyTi.FL I j •HF„_DUT E, TT ONE CONTRACT . NET BID 1•B. H. Miller Construction- Co. 5 2152 Du Pont Drive. ' Newport. Beach, California 92664 237,600.00 239,900.00 -0- $477,500.00 2.Julian-Waterfield(Joint Venture) 2302 S. Anne St. Santa Ana, California 92704 255,000.00 252,o00.Oo 5,000.00 502,000.00 3.Allison Honer Company P. 0. Box 84 Santa Ana, California 92702 2540988.00 258,o48.00 • 3,500.00 509,536.00 4.1 orris Builders 3912 East Century Blvd. Lyn:;ood, California 252,947.00 289,401.00 ,000.00 538,348..00 5.Merco Construction Engineers, !no. 1704 Ruxton Lane It Redondo Beach, California 90278 (Bid submitted for both projects only) -0- 552,837.00 .Coastate Builders 2 750 East -Spring Street Long Beach, California 90806 . 241,000.00 (Schedule I bid only) 241,000.00 7.Rilssell S. Best, General Contractor, 2148 W. loth Street ' Long Beach, California 90813 255,990.00 (Schedule I bid only) -0- 255,990.00 8.Cloclt Construction Company 14799 Chestnut Street Westminster, California 92683 (Schedule II bid gnly) 240,gg0.o0 -0- , 240,990.00 . 9.Aler. Robertson Company 4300 Campus Drive Newport Beach, California 92660 (Schedule II bid only) 245,000.00 -0- 245,000.00 - 1 .Victor Construction Co. , Inc. 11600 E. Artesia d Artesia, California (Schedule II bid only) 253,563.00 -0- 253,563.00 ll.biayfair Construction Co. N• 716 E. Edna Place Covina, California 91723 (Schedule II bid only) -254,842.00 -0- 254,842.00 RESOLUTION NO. 71-118-1 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOBS NO. J-7-2 AND J-12 '.•' A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR ADMINISTRATION-ENGINEERING BUILDING ADDITION AND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITIES, JOBS .NO. ' J-7-2 AND J-12 --------------- The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Wm. P. Ficker, A. I.A, District' s architect , and concurred in by the District 's Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to B. H. MILLER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Contractor, for AD14INISTRATION-ENGINEERING BUILDING ADDITION AND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITIES, JOBS NO. J-7-2 AND J-12, and the proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for said- Jobs No. J-7-2 and J-12 be awarded to B. H. MILLER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Contractor, in the total amount of $477,500, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant, to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are sv� hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting on September 30, 1971• Agenda Item #7 -G- District 1 RESOLUTION NO. 71-119-1 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. I-8 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS . OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR INTERPLANT INFLUENT INTERCEPTOR, JOB NO. I-8 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 55 65 7, and 11, of Orange County, adopted Resolution No. 71-115, conditioning award of contract upon receipt of recommendation of the General Counsel; and, Section 2. That the letter this day submitted to the Board of Directors by the General Counsel, datbd September 28, 1971, recommending that award of contract be made to KORDICK & RADOS, Contractor, for -INTERPLANT INFLUENT INTERCEPTOR, Job No. I-8, and the proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That the contract for said Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8, be awarded to KORDICK AND RADOS, Contractor, in the total amount of $6,387,511, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor; and, Section 5. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting on September 30, 1971. Agenda Item #8 -H- District_ MILLER,NISSON F3 KOGLER CLARK MILLER ATTORNEYS AT LAW TELEPHONE C.ARTHUR NISSON 2014 NORTH BROADWAY 542-6771 NELSON KOGLER SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706 H.LAWSON MEAD September 28, 1971 Board of Directors County Sanitation District #1 of Orange County, California Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California Re : Job No. I-8 Gentlemen: The status of the right-of-way insofar as the City of Huntington Beach is concerned appears to be secure for the District and its contractors for the subject contract. I am therefore recommending that you. proceed to award the contract as soon as you have received final federal and state approval of the project upon which the grant funding this project is conditioned . Very truly yours, i General Counsel CAN:cp I Agenda Item �8 -I- District 1 I )i 'A PI ).) V L) li L JL V lY S HE E T En. Ineers' s e ,1971 ,11 :0 st. L� o5,499. DATEAu�•ust0 a .m. CONTRACT FOR; INTERPLANT INFLUENT INTERCEPTOR, , JOB NO. I-8 r DEDUCT FOR CONTRACTOR SCHEDULE I SCHEDULE II ONE CONTRACT NET BID 1. KORDICK AND RADOS, A JOINT VENTURE 0o P. 0. Box 279 Baldwin Park, California 91706 5,231,536.00 1,332,975.00 177,000.00 $6,387,511.00 2. J. F. SHEA CO. , INC. 655 Brea Canyon Road Walnut, California 91789 4.00 . 1 28 o0.00 20 00.00 6 21 4 • SULLY MILIJ.:R CONTRACTING COMPANY 3000 East South Street Long Beach, California 90805 401 oo 1 4 1 10 oo ll0 000 0 6 `•`- P.ERINI CORPORATION One Maritime Plaza San Francisco, California 94111* 2 488.0o 1,847,000.00 549,000.00 *6 82 . 488 oo • ICEMPER-DRUIM,M0ND-BR0NNECK, A Joint Venture 1710 Santa Monica Blvd. Santa .Monica California 90404 4 6 00.00 1 88 1 0.00 000.00 6 82 6 0.0o 6. VIDO ARTUKOVICH &- SON, INC. 11155 Rush Street So. El Monte, California 10 774.00 1,278 1 .00 . -0 6 288 96 .00 - MATT J. ZAICH CONSTRUCTION' CO. 6822 Farmdale Avenue North Hollywood, California 6 101 4 0.00 1 3 8 11.00 • -0- • * 4 61.Oo eerrtarY . m CORRECTED TOTALS of t Couhn D 5 strict C 1n Oi S�rutati,or' N. 9. No �,- sP 8 1y 71 RESOLUTION NO. 71-120-1 • AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. P2-11-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AWARDING CONTRACT FOR HEADWORKS "C�' EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 25 JOB NO. P2-11-1 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by John Carollo Engineers, and concurred in by the District' s Deputy Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to E.T.I. & Kordick, a joint venture, for Headworks . "C" Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-11-1, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for said Job No. P2-11-1, be awarded to E.T.I. & Kordick, Contractor, in the total amount of $1,228,000.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular adjourned meeting held September 30, 1971. Agenda Item #9 -K- p; strict 1 r Engineer' s Estimate $1,200, 000. o BID TABULATION S H E E T Date September 1: 00 A Contract: Headworks "C" Expansion at Plant_ No. 2 Job No. P2-11-1 Contractor Total. Bid 1. E.T.I. & Kordick, A Joint Venture _ 9778 Wes# Katella, Suite 103 Anaheim, California 92804 $1,228,000. 2. Ziebarth and Alper 21205 Bolsa Street Torrance, California $15315,700. 3. I. Putnam Heiick, A Corporation 550 West 40th Street (P. 0. Box 2476) San Bernardino, California 92406 $15355,000. 4 . Climate Conditioning Corp. 10560 Fern Avenue Stanton, California 90680 $15413,966. 5 C. Harper Construction Company, Inc. 1209 West 190th Street .Gardena, California 90248 $1,588,600. 6: 7. . 8. 9 • 10. - Agenda Item #9 -L- District 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 of Orange County, California ADDENDUM NO. 1 to CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS AND. PLANS for SUNFLOAR INTERCEPTOR, REACH 3 AND . RED HILL INTERCEPTOR,' REACHES 4 AND 5 , CONTRACT NO. .7-6-3 PROPOSAL AND BOND FORMS 1 . Page 1 , in second line on the page which ' reads: "TO: THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 ," change NO. 1 to N0. 7. _ 2. Page 9, in eighth line on the page which reads : "DISTRICT NO. 1 , of Orange County, California, a public corporation" change NO. 1 to NO. 7. .3. Page 11 , in the ninth line on the page which reads : ".DISTRICT: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 ," change NO. 1 to NO. 7. PLANS 1 . Sheet No. 4 - The approximate surface at the centerline of the road shown on the profile between Station 247+00 and Station 252+00 should be raised 1 .0 foot and extended to join the existing elevation at Station 245+00. Conrad Hohener, Jr. , C.E: 10951 CH: ld 9-15-71 B-007-101-52 Addendum No. 1 Page 1 Agenda Item #10 -M- District 7 Engineert.s Estimate :$926,,301.00, BID - TABULATION S H E ET Date September 21, 1971, -11:00 a.m. `✓Contract for: Sunflower Interceptor, Reach.-3 & Red Hill Interceptor, Reaches ZE & 5 Contract No. 7-6-3 'CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Colich Construction Co. 8320 Isis Avenue Los Angeles, California 90045 $1,060,422.58 2. Mike Masanovieh Construction Co. , Inc. 63 Alta Street Arcadia, California 91006 1,071,752.00 3. Burdick Contractors, Inc. P. 0. Box 99180 Sari Diego, California 92109 1,1072,900.00 4. Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. 1704 Ruxton Lane Redondo Beach, California 90278 1,090,073.00 5. Aristo Construction Company 1141 No. Highland Oaks Drive .Arcadia, California 91006 1,116,252.00 Sully Miller Contracting Company 3000 East South Street Long Beach, California 90805 1,127,469.00 7. K. E. C. Company P. 0. Box 1338 Hawaiian Gardens, California 11167:623.00 8. Ernest E. Pestana, Inc. 2225 Old Oakland Road San Jose, California 95131 1,216,079.00 9. Steve Kral Corporation P. 0. Box 190 Baldwin Park, California 91706 1,224,279.00 10. Matt J. Zaich Construction Co. & Matt J. Zaich Individually 6822 Farmdale Ave. North Hollywood, California 1,225,390.111 11. Charles L. Burch & Sons, Inc. 2419 North Chico Avenue South El Monte, California 91733 1,236,830.00 12. Steve Bubalo Construction , P. 0. Box 1067 Reseda, California 11237,378.00 3. George Miller Construction Co. 3032 Bandini Blvd. Los Angeles, California 90023 1,241.94o.90 Agenda Item #11 -N- District 7 RESOLUTION N0, 71-121-7 AWARDING CONTRACT NO,, 7-6-3 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR, REACH 3 AIv'D RED HILL INTERCEPTOR. REACHES �F AND 5., CONTRACT NO. 7-6-3 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering, District's engineers, and concurred in by the District' s Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to Colich Construction Co. , Contractor, for SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR, REACH 3 AND RID HILL INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 4 AND 5, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-3, and the posposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; -and, Section 2. That the contract for said Contract No. 7-6-3, be awarded to Colich Construction Co. , Contractor, in the total amount of $1,060,422. 58, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, . Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractorfor said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsucessful bidders. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned -regular meeting on September 30, 1971. Agenda Item #11 -0- District 7 s � . ' 1 f r ENGINEERS e ARCHIT'ECTS iJ 0. ` 412 SOUTH LYON STREET SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHONE (714) 547-4471 ADDRESS REPLY.TO P.O. BOX 178 September 14, 1971 Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 - Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Attention Mr. Ray E. Lewis Deputy Chief Engineer McGow Avenue Subtrunk, Portion. of Reach 49 Jamboree Road Subtrunk No. 2, Reach 52 In response to your request we submit the following proposal for engineering �. services to prepare plans and specifications for subject facilities and to provide construction staking. The total length of the proposed project is approximately 3,250 feet with an estimated construction cost of $751000. Design of the subtrunks will conform to district standards. The Irvine Industrial Complex will be the contracting agency and will let the contract to the lowest responsible bidder through public bidding procedures. The specification format wil! conform to Irvine Industrial Complex standards. We have discussed the project with the i.I.C. staff and their consulting engineers and feel that the topographic and survey control data they presently have on hand can be used iri lieu of making a separate field survey for design. The only field survey requirements will be for construction staking. Our fee for preparing plans and specifications will be a lump stim amount of $3,200. This fee is predicated on the scope of work conforming in general to the master plan layout. Should any extenuating circumstances appear when checking the design flows for the drainage area such as larger than normal discharges from proposed developments requiring extensive studies to revamp the master plan, we feel additional compensation should be made on a per diem basis. Per diem work would, of course, be approved in advance. We propose that construction staking be done on a per diem basis at $48 per hour for a 3-man survey crew and $21 per hour for a licensed surveyor. We are ready to proceed with the work upon receiving authorization. BOYLE ENGINEERING Conrad Hohener, Jr., C. E. 10951 P R O F E SS I O N A L E N G i N E E R I N G A N D A R C H I T E C T U R A L S E R V i C E S Agenda Item > .12 _P,_ District 7 • j y CIVIL ENGINEERING ENVIRONPlEtJTAL PLANNING LAND 8URVEYING September 10, 1971 Job #1562 Orange County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA.. Attention: - Mr. Fred Harper, General Manager Regarding: Calvary Chapel I am requesting -on behalf of Calvary Chapel, a modification of the connection' charge for the church shown on the attached print. The proposed church is to be located at the northwest corner of Fairview and Sunflower Avenues in the City of Santa Ana. The enitre site is 9 . 8 acres and has 542 feet of frontage on Fairview Avenue. The acreage distribution is as follows: Parking and Parking Landscaping 5 .6 Acres Playing Field 1.6 Building Site, •includes Chapel, Fellowship Ha11, Nursery and Classrooms 2 .6 Acres At the present time we intend to construct the parking lot and to erect a tent in which to hold services temporarily. In ap- proximately 30 days, we hope to begin construction on the Chapel. Construction of the nursery and eight classrooms is about one year away. The twenty-eight classrooms to the rear of the site and the FelloN-.ship Hall is future construction and perhaps five years away. The problem now facing the church is that at the present time, based upon the Sanitation District's charges it will be necessary for them to pay $3,675 for the regular connection charge, plus L../ $5, 420 for the trunk. connection charge. _ Tnis represents a total of $9,095 in sewerage charges, yet they only intend to connect appro}:imately 10 water closets and 5 urinals, plus some lavatory and drinking fountain units in the Chapel itself. Even at the 2530 NORTH GRAND AVENUE P.O. BOX 11667 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92711 TELEPHONE (714) 542-2336 Agenda Item A9 Q_1 • District 7 i -2-- Orange County Sanitation Districts September 10 , 1971 ` ultimate development, it is not anticipated that the total fixture count would be more than twice what the initial count will be. We believe that the charges in this particular instance are not in line with the benefit to be derived from the connection be- cause of the small area actually being used for development. Therefore, we respectfully request a modification of the sewerage charge for this particular installation. We realize that this is an unusual request. However we do feel that it is a fair one for both the Church and the District. We would appreciate anything that might be done to reduce and/or postpone the payment of the total sewerage charge as outlined. Thank you for your cooperation and attention to this matter. HALL & FOREMAN., INC. Hugh4_. FViceresident HHF:m Enclosure 1, r Agenda Item #1 Q-2 District 7 . I Cluj•' \\\ \ \ ¢++•Il \. \ \ \ \ \\\\\\\� '.\\\,�`\ ,\ '\\\•� ' \�`y_\\ 1\, • �' [ _•r �,:.-jam i i_r:..� �1.��. .�1��.-LC---'J-�" --� j Ifl:.:/ .—• (� � . � .n Ci�r� I I 1• T yL t. _—-6 •.y. t of � ,�i � C3 ". orn a woo 4- LLJ UO LA It f I a t Ia �rKv:e:•:n.v i+Jy�J..w.. - _ M..�'m t+r•�J a Y wi. Ql ..L Az ' O �.J'•• .� 7J �••Y {M uJ`: SVl4 Il •X J�+la+r 7n1�•/7 M O.Fv �M�• C 30p3AI A i I A I VIJ j9b Y U 11 M V r) i i + i i n MJLLr_s,,Nl55oN 3 KoCL-S, CtARK MLLLCrr ATTOnN CYS AT LAW TELCP"Or,r. C.Anj#1Vn 2014 N01ITF► OnOAOWAY _ 6�2•Gf), • NCLSON KOGLCn SANTA ANA,CALIfoANIA 9270G _ 1 f/.LAWSO►r MCAO ! August 25th 1 9 7 1 City Council City of Tustin Tustin, California Re City of Tustin Median Island Construction - Job No. 7-3 Gentlemen: The directors of County Sanitation Dis- trict No. 7 have considered the problem of subsidance of a portion of the curbing of your median construc- tion in Red Hill Avenue northerly of Bryan Avenue. S.t appears that the construction of the sewer by County Sanitation District No. 7 in Red Hill . 1•1.� Avenue some nine years ago was not the cause of the subsidance. The sewer was constructed and the back- fill compacted according to county requirements which were controlling at that time. The road was resurfaced' and used for the intervening nine years without failure. Your median construction changed the structure of the road , s and was the direct cause of the subsequent subsidance . The directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 do recognize a legitimate difference of opinion regarding this problem. They also recognize the urgency of the need for repairs and the emergency nature of the situation. As a compromise and without admitting liability, the directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 will approve the use of sewer connection fees collected by the- City of Tustin for payment of. the costs of repairs to correct subsidance in Red Hill Avenue for the 600 ft. section of median now under construction by the City of Tustin under the following terms and conditions : I, County Sanitation- District No. 7 engineers and the City Engineer of the City of Tustin Shall prepare and appz-ove the plans and specifications for Agenda Item #14 R-1 • District 7 ` #2 -- City .rouncil Aug . ,: 25, 1971 correcting the subsidance involved. 2. County Sanitation District No. V will have the repair work performed according to said approved plans and specifications and the City of Tustin will pay for the cost of repairs from said connection fees heretofore collec- ted by it for connections to district sewers . 3. The City of Tustin will assume all responsibility for further subsidance in Red Hill Avenue in the 600 ft. area involved after completion of this repair project. 4. The City of Tustin will not undertake to alter the structure of Red Hill Avenue in the future in any area of' Red hill Avenue without first notifying County Sanitation _ District No. 7 of its proposed construction work. 5. The County Sanitation District No . 7 does not admit liability for any subsidance in any other part of Red Hill Avenue should it occur in the future .' If this proposal for settlement of the problem is satisfactory, please advise the District in writing and in--. struct your City Engineer to act in accord with this proposal-. - Respectfully yours , t . CO' Arthur Nisson General Counsel for County Sanitation District No . 7 CAN:mjb cc: Mr. Clifford C. Miller Mr. Paul G. Brown Agenda Item #. 1 R-2 District 7 o 1 ' September 16, 1971 Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District #7 P. O. Box 8127 ' Fountain Valley, CA, 92708 Attention: Fred Harper, Manager _ Gentlemen: We are in receipt of the letter dated August 25, 1971, signed by C. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel for County Sanitation District No. 7 . In reviewing the letter, the City does not concur with the con- tentions made by Mr. Nisson regarding the cause of failure, and �qw� our position is proven so by the soil tests made by the City of Tustin. We do, however, appreciate the Board' s attitude with regard to the mutual problem concerning failure and settlement of the backfill material over the District' s trunk sewer line in Red Hill north 'of Bryan Avenue in the City of Tustin. As you know, the City Council has authorized the expenditure of up to $10, 000 of County Sanitation District No. 7 Main Trunk Funds held in trust by the City of Tustin, at their August 16 , 1971, meeting as indicated by the enclosed minute order. With regard to the specific conditions - proposed in Mr. Nisson 's letter, we are pleased to be able to report that our staff has met with the District's staff and agreement in principle has been reached as to the methods of repair and that final specifications for the repairs are nearing completion.- ' With regard to item #2 of Mr. Nisson's letter, this is in con- currence with the Council 's previous action with regard to the cost for repairs and with the understanding that the repairs shall be considered complete when approved by the City Engineer of the City of Tustin and that the costs of the soil tests and services of our soil consultant are included within the concept of "cost of repairs" the Council concurs' with condition 2 of the letter. Inasmuch as the City will be determining when the work has been completed to its satisfaction as outlined under item 2 above, we see no objections to assuming responsibilities with regard to further subsidence in this particular section of Red Hill Avenue following completion of the repair project. C.1TY IiA111. 140 W)•:ST F: I:r,pt: P STI:F:F.T Ti.'S4' I '; CAI.IFr!I \IA 0 :6S9 (ilt) .i :4-SS°V Arrenda Item #14 S-1 District 7 Page. 2 Board .of Directors, Sanitation District V 9/1-6/71 With reference to item 4 of Mr. Nisson 's letter, the City will most certainly notify the Sanitation District when we are planning any center island construction activities within 10 feet of any of the District's trunk facilities . It should be. made clear, however, that the City does not intend to abandon its plans concerning the .future construction of center islands in streets which may contain District facilities . With regard to item 5, we would certainly not expect the Sanitation District to admit liability for any subsidence which has not as _ yet occurred in any part of Red Hill or any other street within the City. In a similar manner, the City of Tustin does not admit liability for any future subsidence which may occur over District facilities . Quite obviously, any future subsidence within Red Hill or any other street must be evaluated on the basis of its own merits and causes and responsibility resolved at such time as any additional subsidence may occur. With the understandings as outlined above with regard to Mr. Nisson's letter, the City concurs with the District Counsel 's letter of August 25 , 1971, and again we wish to express our appreciation to the Board for your cooperation with regard to this matter. Very truly yours, ' A. J. Coco Mayor. Attachments . AJC/dh _ -Agenda Item 1.14 8-2 District 7- i ACTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF• THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California was held Monday , August. 16 , 1971 at 7 :30 P.M. Present: Councilmen Coco, C. 'Miller, Marsters, L. Miller, Oster Absent: Councilmen — None Subject: Construction of Center Islands on Red Hill Avenue . North of Bryan Avenue. M. O. "Moved and seconded that expenditure of $10,000 (of County Sanitation , District 7's Main Trunk Fund held in trust by the City) be authorized for the purpose of correcting soil conditions on Red Hill Avenue. Carried unanimously." Meeting adjourned to Monday, August 23, 1971, 6:30 P. M. , in the City Hall Conference Room. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS, CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Ruth C. Poe, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be the official action taken by the City Council at the above meeting. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 14th day o-f September , 1971 RUTH C. POE City Clerk & ex-officio Clerk of the City Council . -Agenda Item4 g.:3 District 7 LAW OFFICES or JACK J. BIDLEL $IMEL. HARV= & LOGAN 714-547-7395 JOHN A. IIARVEY, IlI Y'OL'ttTF1. FLOOR RICHARD N. RINLEL 1010 NORTIT NLAT\ STREET GEORGE 0. LOGAN SANT'A ANA,CALIFORXIA 92701 i JOHN A. BERGEN September 2, 1971 Mr. Fred Harper, General Manager County Sanitation District No. 7 P. O. Box 5175 . Fountain Valley, CA 92708 _ Dear Fred: Re: Proposed Assessment District No. 9 Mr. C. Arthur Nisson, Jr, and I are advised that District No. 7-intends to commence another sewer assessment district to be known as Assessment District No. 9, and that there is a possibility that the total construction cost would be so low that 2-1/2% of the total construction cost would not-amount to the sum of $1, 000, which is the minimum on the percentage fee for legal services as established by your District's Resolution No. 63-57-7, adopted . April 16, 1963. In that resolution, Mr. Nisson and the undersigned were employed to perform all of the legal services in all assessment district projects commenced by District No. 7. The total construction cost would have to exceed $40, 000 to realize a fee of $1, 000 at the 2--1/2% rate now established by resolution. Since there is a possibility that the total construction cost might not exceed $40, 000, you and the Board of Directors of District 7 are advised as follows: Mr. Nisson and I have discussed this matter and we are agreeable and do hereby advise. your Board that for the purposes of your proposed Sewer Assessment District No. 9, the $1, 000 minimum fee as set forth in Section 2 of said resolution will be modified and reduced to a minimum fee of not less than $750. 00 for the ordinary services therein described. This minimum fee arrangement will become important only if the 2-1/2% of actual construction cost produces a figure less than $750. 00. Our percentage fee, then, would be 2-1/276 of actual construction cost with a minimum of $750'. 00. All of the other provisions of said Resolution No. 63-57-7 pertaining to fees will remain the same with the exception that Mr. Nisson now receives $45. 00 per hour and $250. 00 per diem for his work in the acquisition of easements. Very truly yours, �..' C. M-bur Nisson, Jr, and, Jack J. Rimel / . B y .r l JJR/jc Jack•J.--Rimel cc: Mr. Nisson / .Agenda Item #15 -T- District 7 Q . Agenda Item No._ �y•r__, L August 3, 1971 County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92.708 Attention: Mr. Ray Lewis Re: Tentative Tract No. 7339, County of Orange Dear Sir: Pursuant to procedure established for said district we hereby request the following described property be annexed to County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County: see attached legal description The property 1s a part of the Estate of Marion E. Jones, deceased. The executrix of said estate is Marldayle Thompson Peay. The assessed value of the real property contained in the estate of 37.204 acres is $83,790.00, or $2,252. 18 per acre. Based upon this ratio of assessed value to land area, the assessed value of subject property is $22,974.49 . The property is uninhabitated. I enclose herewith a cashiers check payable to the district to cover processing costs. Yours very truly, i Marldayle Thompson Peay r� Executrix of the Estate of Marion E. Jones, deceased Agenda Item #,'17 .-U— District 7 August 16, 1971 County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue P -1, Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Ray Lewis Re: Petition for annexation of property of Marion E. Jones Estate (amended) County of Orange Dear Sir: . Pursuant to procedure established for said district -we hereby request the following described property be annexed to County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION! The property is a part of the Estate of Marion E. Jones, deceased. The executrix of said .estate is Maridayle Thompson Peay. The assessed value of the real property contained in the estate of 37.204 acres is $83,790.00, or $2,252. 18 per acre. - The property is uninhabitated. Please apply the cashiers check submitted with earlier petition, dated August 3, 1971 , to this amended petition. Yours very truly, Maridayle Thompson Peay Esecutrix of the Estate of Marion E. Jones, deceased Agenda Item #17 —V_ District 7 P.O. DOX 449 300 EAST CHAPMAN AVENUE p_ TELEPHONE 633.2300 -z"7t• ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92666 �.`i '-_-_ I ;• i l ' ( r ~ 114 - 1 , September 22 1971 Board of Directors Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: This letter is in reference to the problem referred by your Board to the Orange City Council concerning the sanitary sewers serv- ing the areas north of Chapman Avenue and east of Santiago Boulevard. Since 1966, it has been the policy of the City of Orange to maintain low density in this area. This is indicated in the report entitled "Master Plan of Trunk Sewer Facilities for County Sanitation District No. 7," prepared by Boyle Engineering and dated May 1969. (See Page S, Item 3.) The Orange Unified School District has also made its plan with regard to the construction and location of school facilities based on a density as desired by the City in its sphere of influence. The City of Orange has an up-to-date General Plan of the City and the East Orange area, and public hearings on this will commence in *the next few weeks. At the adjourned meeting of the Orange City Council on September 21, 1971, a motion was adopted that it be the policy of the City of Orange that the subject area be maintained with a density approximating that of R-1-8000 square feet. It is recommended that your Honorable -Body take this into consider- ation in making any decision relative tosanitary sewers in the area. Sincerely, . Don E. Smith Mayor DES:MMc 1 INCORPORATED APRIL 6. 1860 Agenda Item # 17 W-1 District 7 P 1 ' TO: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF 01�r-'-.GE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ATTN: FRED A. HARMER, GENERAL MANAGER P. 0. Box. 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFOrum 92708 An excerpt from the minutes of an adjourned regular Meeting of the City Council, City of Orange, California, held September 21, 1971. Its RE REPORT Oil SANITARY SEWER COiv1ECiI0►i AT QL ,iAii AVENUE t1,vD SANTIAGO BOULEVARD: Mayor Smith, reported on a request from the County pf Orange Sanitation District for Council.'s opinion on density for the ; general area north of Chap-man Avenue and east of Santiago Boulevard outside the City of Orange. Moved by Councilman E(ileman, seconded by Councilman Hoyt, and duly adopted, that in ans:.,er to the Sanitation District's request, that 'if this senera•l. area were in the City of Orange our general policy would be that the density factor should not be greater than 8,000 square feet. Dated -this 22nd day of September, 1971. EMILY L. WILSON City Clerk and ex-officio clerk of the Council by' Barbara L. Sack, Deputy -Agenda Item #17 W-2 District 7 0,R1 ALLARD, $H ELTON & O�CON NOR ATTORNEYS AT LAW fVJr� 160 POMONA MALL WEST, SIXTK FLOOR ' LEONARD A;SHELTON -POMONA. CALIFORNIA 91766 JOSEPH A.ALLARD MAURICE'O'CONNOR R.CRAIG MCMANIGAL (714) 622-1041 AND (213) 964.2393 (1687-1968) EUGENE J.AXELROO FERDINAND F. FERNANDEZ THOMAS C.13RAYTON PAUL M. MAHONEY TERRENCE J.BRUTOCAO September 17 , 1971 Directors, Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: Our firm prepared the Federal Estate Tax return for the estate of Marion E. Jones , deceased, and we are now involved in matters relative to the audit of that return, and payment. of the tax, which payment has been deferred. We have also been in charge of efforts to sell the land which' is the principal asset of the estate, and which we seek to annex to your district. A hearing on the annexation is set for September 30, 1971. The value of the estate is in the neighborhood of $1 ,000 ,000.00 , and its principal asset is the land which seeks annexation to your district. Without the sale of that land it is not possible to pay the Federal Estate Tax and the California Inheritance Tax. Nothing has yet been paid on the Federal Estate Tax. Over a year ago we commenced proceedings to sell the land, and have faced 'many unexpected delays. It is hoped that we are on the verge of making the sale, which is of extreme importance to the estate. I hope that you will do whatever you can to avoid any further delay. If we were to lose this sale, we have no other sale in prospect, and the estate' might suffer very heavy loss. We would appreciate anything you can do to assure prompt annex- ation of the land to your district and whatever else is required of you in order to allow us to close our- escrow. Yours truly,} L. A. Shelton of ALLARD, SHELTON & O'CONNOR Agenda Item #18 -X- District 7 nor-yada land co. 869-C East Foothill Blvd. Upland, California 91786 Telephone 714/985-7281 September 16, 1971 Honorable Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County_ Post Office Box 8127 _ Fountain Valley, California Re: Tentative Tract No. 73890 Marion E. Jones Estate Gentlemen: We are the developers of the above referenced project and have been advised by our representative, Evans 8 Associates, Inc., that the Board did not take affirmative action on the petition for annexation of the Jones Estate at its regular meeting of September 8, 1971 , but held this matter over for consideration at an adjourned meeting to be held on September 30, 1971 , It Is our understanding that one of the points in question is the method of serving the first increment of development, Tentative Tract No. 7389, being approximately 10 acres in area and located in the southeasterly corner of the property of the estate. It is our further understanding that although the sewer system within this unit could be drained to the west, outletting Into the main in Santiago Boulevard, it is the recommendation of your engineering staff that this area be served by draining to the south into a prODosed sub-trunk sewer line in Chapman Avenue. As the time of construction of this line is indefinite and since It Is imperative that we record and commence development of Tract No. 7389, at the earliest possible date, we hereby offer to construct a portion of the Master Plan Sub-trunk Sewer Line In Chapman Avenue, between Santiago Boulevard and Crawford Canyon Road. This offer is conditioned upon entering into a contract with the District for reimbursement of the costs of construction of the sewer line in accordance with previously established ' procedures of the District from funds available for this purpose. -Agenda Item #19 Y-1 District 7 Vie enclose herewith a sketch showing approximate location and limits of construction of this line. We will appreciate your consideration and approval of this offer and your affirmative action on the petition for annex- ation of the Jones Estate. Yours very truly, NOR-VADA LAND COMPANY R. T. Hebard President RTH:*d,j b Encl . Agenda Item #_19 Y-2 District 7 ct ,a�:-ti�-tea s� k Ty7 7Y.7.r A Pp ^" I Sewc •, ,•;--y. I „- ,,, ^ _ � 't Z �„� � �,•�.! Cvnnccfion fvr- Tr: ' 7389 14 • � � �w ! � � Fufui e �x�ension � • • � �� i 1---�---`�P.�•�.ti'�� C� ,3:.�,c y! L;.�t _ � \L I� o�'Sci6-Trunk. • r Nor m00% Land 60- /V / V i0✓v d Skefch may: cy410MA/V QVFV&�g' MASrE,e ,P/.QN SLIa-r,PUIV4� ct E�.a�vs�Q ssociA rE's �iVO SEwE,P IO2OPOY�- SY MOR, k140A L AND CO. /S43 vY G'ol-vcy Ave. ct GI/esf Co vino Ca/ 2113-96.7--40B/ Se of /6, 1971 ?'eeting, Date d Time V 0 Districts DIGTPICT 1 <�� � _ ( �, JOINT BURROS --� Just Harper Griset V1, Herrin ✓ ✓ Berton Westra Miller ✓ Coco Christie Root Porter y ✓ ✓ Clark Jackson Bat t=ln. V ✓ Coen Cul ve r DISTRICT 2 Davis Fonte Finnell Gomez Smith Hileman Green McCracken '].sti e Root Griset Herrin Z`t'ark Jac?1:son Harper Just Culver Harvey , Kanel Finnell Gomez _ Hemeon Lewis Herrin Griset Herrin- Griset Just Harper Hirth Croul SLi ms Zuniga Holden Hogard Stephenson Dutton Hyde Kroesen Wedaa Machado McInnis Hirth Zinn �:chni epp McWhinney Battin_ Miller Coco Parsons DISTRICT 3 Porter Rogers Hirth Bez•ton W S;est ie "estra Shipley McCracken Sims Zuniga Christie -Root Smith Hileman Clark Jackson Smith Dutton Culver Wedaa 'Machado Davis �'onte Green I Winn Schnie cCracken pp Harper Just Battin Harvey Kanel Ilerrin Griset Hemeon Lewis Mitchell Holden Hogard Boyd Goldberg lninney b�ns Zuniga Stephenson Dutton_ OTHI;I'LS Battin • "— Harper V DIST ECT 5 Brot•m Parsons Sylvester • Hirth Croul Lewis vDunn Battin Clarke v DISTRICT 6 Sigler Porter ,� Crabb lcli:inis Hirth Battin Carlson ✓ ( r ° Finster DIST -ICT 1 0) 6 a-� ` �/' _ 2 Gallot-ray —" =r ✓ Coco ✓ ✓ ��" Hohener `� ✓ Herrin ✓ ✓ HuntGr�.set .-� KeithPorter ✓ V, ✓ ✓ Rogers Huth ✓ ✓ j' �° Lowry Smith ✓ Hile::lan ✓ ✓ / iladdox Battin �r � !•lard ns on Ilisson ✓ D:LSrf p,_l(;T 11 Piersall S�pley McCracken , S even. .n �� 3�attin DISTRICT B y Goldberg i•i i t,c hell Battin EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 35 55 6, 7 anJ 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos . 1, 25 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m. , September 8 , 19 71 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California . The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.n. The roll was called and the Secretary reporte,' a quorum present for each District' s Board . DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, be adjourned to September 30, 1971 at 5:00 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:00 p.m. , September 8, 1971. �.d STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos . 1, 2, 3, F, F, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, to hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 8th day of September , 19 71 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hav;nty unto set my hand this 8th ,9ay Of September, 1971 rd ,� the Boar('s of Directors f C anitation Districts Nos . 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 5-107 a EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos . 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange �...✓ County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m. , September 8 , 19 71 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California . The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. The roll was called and the Secretary reporteA a quorum present for each District' s Board . DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, be adjourned to September 30, 1971 at 5:00 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:52 p.m. September 8, 1971. STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J . WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos . 1, 2, 3, F, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, to hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 8th day of September 19 71 - IN WITN S-3rHERE017 -I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day Of- Se-tembez',--_l4C0un;tySa he Boa ('s of Directors of itation Districts Nos . 13 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 S-107 Agenda Item No.� 1 FORM OF MINUTES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 2 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9 3 September 30, 1971 co i O.Q CQ_{n1.e v 5,141 k 4 The Secretary advised the Board that there had heretofore4been filed 5 with the Board a petition by property owners under the provisions of Section 6 2804 of the Streets and Highways Code, requesting the formation of an 7 assessment district under the 1911 Act to construct sanitary sewers and 8 appurtenances and appurtenant work in proposed "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 9 NO. 9" and requesting the Board to waive further proceedings under the 10 "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 11 1931. " He further advised the Boar�d�t�at t�ere was on file a letter from the 12 Engineer of Work, Boyle Engineering; stating that said petition had been .13 checked as to ownership and that the petition represented owners of more 14 than ninety per cent (9076) of the area of the property to benefit by the pro- 15 posed improvement. There was then presented to the Board for its con- 16 sideration a resolution numbered RESOLUTION NO.71—,10-1 entitled: 17 "A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE 18 COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 2804 OF THE STREETS AND 19 HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY 20 SEWERS AND APPURTENANCES AND APPURTENANT WORK IN A PORTION OF SAID SANITATION DISTRICT TO BE KNOWN 21 AS 'ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9' OF SAID SANITATION DISTRICT. " 22 23 It was moved by Director that said resolution be adopted and 24 said motion was seconded by Directorl� and carried by the fol- 25 lowing roll call vote: 26 AYES: Directors 27 NOES: Directors 28 ABSENT: Directors 29 nq _ 30 Edwin H. Finster of Boyle Engineering, the Engineer of Work for 31 proposed "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9, " presented] to the Board of 32 Directors for its consideration and approval the Plans for said proposed LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL. HARVEY & LOGAN FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. - SANTA ANA, ' CALIFORNIA 92701 II 1 work and improvement, entitled "Construction Plans for the Sanitary Sewer 2 System in Assessment District No. 9, County Sanitation District No: 7 of 3 Orange County, California, 1T dated August, 197.1, consisting of 4 sheets, 4 numbered 1 to 4, inclusive. Director &L moved that said 5 Plans be approved, received and filed, and said motion was seconded by 6 Director o and carried by the following roll call vote: 7 AYES: Directors 8 NOES: Directors 9 ABSENT: Directors 10 's, 11 Mr. Finste next submitted to the Board of.Directors for its consider 12 ation and approval the Specifications for said proposed "ASSESSMENT DIS- 13 TRICT NO. 9, 1 consisting of "General Provisions, 11 "Standard Specifications: 14 and "Detailed Specifications, it Director �)�_' moved that said 15 Specifications e approved, received and filed, and•said motion was seconded 16 by Director and carried by the following roll call vote: 17 AYES: Directors 18 NOES: Directors 19 ABSENT: Directors 20 21 Mr. Finster then submitted to the Board for its consideration and 22 approval the Diagram or Plat of-the proposed "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 23 NO, 9, " entitled "Proposed Boundaries of Assessment District No. 9, 24 County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, Calif. , " dated August, 25 1971, consisting of one sheet. Director moved that said 26 Diagram or Plat be approved, received and filed, and said motion was 27 seconded by Director and carried by the following roll 28 call vote: `.Moll 29 AYES: Directors 30 NOES: Directors 31 ABSENT: Directors 32 LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL• HARVEY & L0GAN FOURTH FLOOR -2- 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 1 Mr. Finster then offered to the Board of Directors, for its con- 2 deration and approval, the proposed Estimate of Cost for all acquisition, 3 work and improvement, including incidental expenses there f, for said 4 proposed "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9. " Director 5 moved that said Estimate of Cost be approved, Feceived and filed, and 6 said motion was seconded by Director tl"zJand carried by 7 the following roll call vote: 8 AYES: Directors 9 NOES: Directors 10 ABSENT: Directors 11 12 The Secretary then advised the Board that a resolution had been 13 received from the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, numbere 14 RESOLUTION NO.. consenting to the construction of nitary 15 sewers and appurtenances in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. " Said 16 resolution was received and filed. 17 18 The Manager then offered to the Board for is consideration a 19 , proposed Resolution of Intention to be number RESOLUTION OF INTENTIO 20 NO. entitled as follows: 21 "A RESOLUTION OF THE BOA OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTR T NO. 7 OF ORANGE 22 COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, D LA RING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE CONSTRUCT N OF SANITARY SEWERS AND 23 APPURTENANCES AND PPURTENANT WORK IN 'ASSESS- MENT DISTRICT NO. IN SAID SANITATION DISTRICT; 24 DECLARING ITS INT NTION TO ORDER THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN LAN RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS 25 NECESSARY IN NNECTION WITH SAID WORK AND IMPROVEMEN AND TO ASSESS THE COSTS OF SAID ACQUISI- 26 TION, tNCLU ING THE INCIDENTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES THEREOF, S PART OF THE COST OF SAID WORK AND 27 IMPROVE ENT; DECLARING THE ACQUISITION OF SAID LANDS, GHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS AND THE WORK 28 AND I PROVEMENT 'TO BE OF MORE THAN LOCAL OR ORD ARY PUBLIC BENEFITAND DESCRIBING THE DISTRICT 29 T BE BENEFITED BY SAID ACQUISITION, WORK AND IMPROVE- NT AND TO PAY THE COSTS AND EXPENSES THEREOF; FIX- 30 NG THE TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OF OBJECTIONS TO SAIE ACQUISITION, WORK AND IMPROVEMENT. " 31 , 32 LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL. HARVEY & � LOGAN FOURTH FLOOR - -3- 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92701 1 le 2 as the moved by Director that said 3 RESOLUTION OF NTION NO, be adopted, .and said motion 4 was seconded by Director and carried by the following 5 roll call vote: 6 AYES: Directors 7 NOES: Directors 8 , 9 - 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL. HARVEY& LOGAN _4 FOURTH FLOOR ' 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92701 l� 9OV9 ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS ENGINEERING 412 SOUTH LYON STREET SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHONE 1 714) 547-4471 ADDRESS REPLY TO P.O. BOX 176 September 30, 1971 Dnaru of directors County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92700 Gentlemen: A copy of the letter dated September 17, 1971 addressed to Mr, Ray E. Lewis - Engineer, from C. R. Wolven, has been submitted to this office for review and comment. The last sentence of the second paragraph alleges that "Boyle Engineering assured us there should be no problems as far as the sanitary sevreis vrerc concerned, as there was an existing trunk iire in Santiago Blvd. w,th sufficient capacity to service the property, " P.)y!e Engineering denies his ailegariun. Because of many years of experience as consultant to various public agencies; Doyle Engineering is ocuteiy a,•,^-e of its relation to the policy determining body of an agency such as Sanitakiori District No. 7 and to coiner members of the agency's staff. Our staff rigidly follows a poi icy of not encroaching upon the prerogatives of the gove►-ning bony. The allegation is made that t'riis office gave assurances which in fact could crly be given by final determinat'son of the directors. It is commoi, for persons requesting engineering data to contact this office directly or to be referred to this office by your staff. It is our long standing policy to give only general data concerning district boundaries, facilities,, or related engineering matters and to refer mcf;ors of policy to your staff. In the instance of this letter, no one in our office can ra-rill o specific conversation wita Mr. Wolven. We do not record all cor.versaiions and have no means of verifying his contact with this office. Because we do receive man,./ calls of this nature, it is probable that infor- mation on sewers in ;he area was requested and given from time to rime to vas ions lnd;viduds. One specific call to this office several months rate- is rc celled by Mi.. Carl Carlson. M engineer \':ifh Frans & Associutes; engineers for :i.; ceveioper of the propeity in question, requested specific: data about c--:nexatir,i- -if the pror rty. In accor4once with our iooq term policy, Mr. "rlson referre0 file caller 10 i'he sanitation district skiff. P R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E R I N G A N D ARCH ITECTU RAL S E R V I C E S Roard of [Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 u{ (Dianne County September 30, 1971 Pag e 2 To date, we have nct been requested by your staff to os;ist in plan checking or other investigations concerning the subject area. Some months ago you adopted a policy that this aMcc would provide services only when specifically authorized. This policy has been observed. Respectfully submitted, BOYLE ENGINEERING 6 Conrad Hohener, Jr., C. E. 10951 ps B-007-001-00 BOY L E E N G IN E E R ING C17V OF ORANGE CIVIC CENTER P.O. BOX 449 ` 300 EAST CHAPMAN AVENUE TELEPHONE 633-2300 ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92666 September 30, 1971 Board of Directors Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: In order that your Board may be aware of the City of Orange's plans for the construction of the sanitary sewer on East Chapman Avenue from Solano to a point approximately 3,000 feet easterly, the following time schedule has been developed and is our best estimate of the timing for the construction of this project. One consideration must be kept in mind; which is that nego- tiations to obtain portions of the right-of-way may tend to accelerate or delay this schedule: Field survey completed October 15, 1971. Plans and specifications completed November 26, 1971. Right-of-way acquired and advertised bids December 1, 1971. Award of contract December 28, 1971. Construction begins January 10, 1971. Construction completed March 1, 1972. Yours truly, �i' Q / .� )"j Don E. Smith Mayor DES:MMc CC: Fonley, Johnson, Evans, Roberts INCORPORATED APRIL S. 1888 t I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS , A ELE PH ONES: £A CODE 714 S40OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA �, 962 241101 P. ❑. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 1OB44 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) September 22, 1971 TO: ME14BERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUTITY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 AND 7 Gentlemen: Pursuant to adjournir-ent of the regular meeting held September 8, 1971, the .Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts No.S . 1 and 7 will. meet in an adjourned .regular meeting: Thursday, September 30, 1971 at 5:00 p.m. 10344 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California i EXECUTIVE COMITTEE - September 30th at 6:00 p.m. MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O. sox 5i75 10844 Ellis Avenue OF Orange County, California Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 �- DISTRICT NO. w - • 962-2411 II September 22 1 P � 971 Adjourned Regular MeetinS Thursday, September 30, 1971 5 :00 P.M. The following is a brief explanation of the items appearing on the enclosed agenda for this joint meeting. District No. 1 No. 5 - APPROVAL OF ADDENDA FOR JOBS NO. J-7-2 AND J-12 : Bids for this contract, for the construction of Administrative-Engineering Building Addition and Vehicle Maintenance Facilities., were opened on September 21. During the course of the bidding, it was necessary to prepare two addenda on each. job in o2•der to clarify technical points . Approval of the addenda is recommended. No, 6 - AI-TA-2D OF JOBS NO. J-7-2 AND J-12 : As mentioned, bids for these new building facilities were opened on September 21 with considerable interest by contractors, a::, the bid tabulation attached to the agenda material will show. The low bid was submitted by B. H. Miller Construction Company, of I%Tei:.,port Beach, in the amount of $477,500 for both facilities ttnd, accordingly, it is recommended that the award be made to this firm for these two jobs under one contract. This lo;v bid is slightly above (approximately �20,000) the architect 's estimate for both jobs combined. No. 7 - At-JARD OF CONTRACT FOR INTERPLAIINIT INFLUENT INTERCEPTOR, JOB N0. 1-8: The Joint Boardc authorized iistrict No. 1 to award this contract to the successful bidder, Kordick and Rados, upon approval by the General Counsel with regard to right of way in Brookhurst Street. Technically, the State and Federal Grant regulations provide that the Districts should not award this contract until approved by the State 1Jater Resources Control Board and the T'nvironmental Protection Agency. We are hopeful that such approval will be received prior to the meeting. No. 8 - AWARD OF CONTRACT, JOB NO. P2-11-1: Bids for this job, Headworks "C" Expansion at Plant No. 2, were opened on September 1 with a total of five contractors submitting bids. As can be seen from the bid tabulation included with the agenda material, the bidding `.s was fairly close and although the low bid exceeds the engineer ' s esti- mate by $28,000, it is obvious that the bidding reflects the true cost of construction. The staff recommends award to E.T. I. & Kordick, a joint venture, the low bidder, in the amount of .$1,228,000. It may be interesting to note that Kordick was also the low bidder on Job No. I-8, in a joint venture with Steve P. ' Rados, Inc . , and that he is also the low bidder as a joint venture with E.T. I. on this project. The Kordick firm has done work for the Districts in the past and we consider them excellent contractors. District No. 7 No. 9 - ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO CONTRACT NO. 7-6-3: During the bidding on this contract, bids for which were opened on September 21, it was necessary to issue an addendum correcting typographical and plan errors. We recommend approval of the addendum, a copy of which is included in the agenda material. No. 10 - AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. 7-6-3: Bids for this job, the Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 3, and the Red Hill Interceptor, Reaches 4 and 5, and which was described in a previous agenda report, were opened on September 21. As can be seen from the bid tabulation included with the agenda material, bidding was excellent and competitive, although the low bidder 's proposal wa-s approximately $64,000 over the engineer ' s estimate. The staff recommends award to Colich Construction Company at their low bid of $1,060,422.58 for this urgently needed facility. The remaining contract (No. 7-6-4) is now out for bid with an engineer's estimate of $578,000. Bids will be taken on October 19, with award scheduled at an adjourned meeting in October on the NEW meeting date of the Executive Committee . In spite of the higher than expected bid on this project, the Director of Finance advises that if this next contract is awarded at a figure approximating the above estimate, the total cost of these two sewers will be approximately $216,000 less than budgeted. No. 11 - ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING PROPOSAI,: The Directors will recall that the Board on August 24 declared its intent to enter into a Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement with the Irvine Industrial Complex for additional master plan facilities and authorized me to direct the engineers to prepare plans and specifications for the facilities in question. Accordingly, we have solicited a proposal from the District ' s engineers for the design work, a copy of which is included in the agenda material. We recommend acceptance of the proposal and authorization to the engineers to proceed. No. 12 - REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF CONNECTION CHARGES: A letter on this subject from the engineers for Calvary Chapel is included with the agenda material. The staff recommends that the requested connection charge modification be denied as contrary to the provisions of the District 's connection charge ordinance. -2- No. 13 - SUBSIDENCE PROBLEM ON RED HILL AVENUE: This matter has been thoroughly discussed at previous Board meetings and on August 24 the Board directed the General Counsel to prepare an agreement with the City of Tustin for correction of the subsidence problem in accordance with the terms formally approved by the Board. Included with the agenda material is the General Counsel's letter to the City of Tustin and the City's reply of September 16, 1971. It is obvious that the City does not agree completely with the terms recommended by the Board but we believe the matter can be worked out to the satisfaction of the respective attorneys and staffs. Under this item, there will be a brief staff report on engineering discussions with the City of Tustin 's staff. In accordance with the Board authorization given at the August 24 meeting, the repair work to be conducted by the District can proceed even though the final agreement between the City of Tustin and the District has not been executed. No. 14 - PROPOSAL OF ATTORNEYS FOR LEGAL SERVICES FOR ASSESS14ENT DISTRICT NO. 9 : Included with the agenda material is a proposal, dated September 2, from C. Arthur Nisson and Jack J. Rimel for the necessary legal services for this small assessment district. We recommend acceptance of the proposal. No. 15 - ACTIONS CONCERNING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9 : The various reports, motions and resolutions included in the agenda material or to be distributed at the meeting, are routine and self-explanatory . No. 16 - FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF PETITION FOR ANNEXATION OF TENTA- TIVE TRACT NO. 7389 : Included with the agenda material under this item are the original and amended petitions of the proponents and a letter dated September 22 front the City of Orange reporting on the ROW City' s position on this subject as requested by the Board at the regular meeting on September 8. No. 17 - LETTER FROM ATTORflTEYS FOR ESTATE OF MARION E. JONES: Included with the agenda material is a letter dated September 17, 1971, relative to the proposed annexation described in the preceding item. No. 18 - PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MASTER PLAN SUBTRUNK SEWER IN CHAP1,1AN AVLTTUE: Included in the agenda material is a letter on this subject from the Nor-Vada Land Company. This matter relates to the proposed annexation described under Item No. 16. Fred A. Harper General Manager -3-