Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971-09-0811 .BOA nos OF D&RE CTO RS County Sani tat io n Distric ts of O ra ng e Cou nty, California P. 0 . Box 5 175 10844 t:ll is Aven ue Founta in Valley, Cali f., 92708 JL IQ li\f T1 .,,, It! 'l II September 8, 1 97 1 -~ AGENDA ADJOURNMENTS POSTEDY COMP & MILEAGE .. ~ FILES SET UP ..... ~.~_..,.. RESOLUTIO NS CERT IFIE D.~ V(l) /'(2 ) (3) ( l+) LETIE RS WRITTEN ..... ~ MINUTES WRITTEN .... ~ Pl e dge of Al leg i ance a r-d I n v ocation Roll Ca ll MINU TES HLED ..•.. v.~ Appointment o f Ch ai rme n p r o tern , if ne cessary EACH DIS'I'RI CT Consi de rat i o n o f mo tions approving minutes of t h e follow i ng mee tings, a s ma i led : v v Di strict 1 Augu s t 1 1, 1 971 reg ular Mj s v Di strict 2 Au g u st 11_, 1 9'11 r egular flf J s .... District 3 August 11, 1 971 spe c i a l M /~ Au gus t 11, 1 971 r egular tv1 Is v/ Di strict 5 Au gust 1 1, 1 97 1 r egular V' Distric t 6 Au gus t 1 1 , 1 9 71 regu l ar M JS Di s tri c t 7 August 11 , 1971 r e~ular M /s L.. Au g ust 24 1 9 71 adJ o urne d 1 , L Distr ict 11 Au gust 11, 1 9'""(1 regul ar MS ~ ALL DISTRICTS Report o f the Joint Ch a i rman (6)\&L ISTEICrf&. '\.. _ "-.. , ~e po o f' th~er a .. ~J1 ana~r ~ ALL DISTRI CTS Q Repo rt of t he Ge n e r a l Coun s e l * * * * * * * * * ( 8 ) ALL DIS TRI C'rS CONSENT CA LE!IDAR All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not re q u i r i ng d iscuss i on o r further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member , or member of the p ubl i c in attendance, there will b~ no separ ate discus sion of these i tems . All item s on the consenL calendar will be enacted bJ one action a.p p rov i ng a l l motions , and ca.sting a unanimous ball ot for resolut i on~ included on tl1e consent calendar . All items removed frrnn the co1IBent calendar shall be considered ::;1::parately in the regular order of' business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, .u pon recog nition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * Ch airman will determine i f any items .are to be de l eted from the c ons ent cal endar . Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent c a l endar not specifically removed from same . (a) y (b) (c) (e ) (f ) (g ) (h) L--"" Consideration of Resolution No . 7 1 -113, approving plans and specifications for Odor Control and Improved Influent Screening Facilities at Reclamation Plant No . 1, Job No . Pl-3-1; and authorizing advertising for bids to be opened October 5, 1 971, at 11:00 a .m., and aut horizing District No . 1 to award contract . See page 11 D11 ----- Conside ration of motion approving Addendum No . 2 to the plans and specifications for Interplant Influent Interceptor , Job No . I -8 . See page 11 E 11 Consideration of mot ion approving Addendum No . 1 to the plans and specifications for Headworks 11 c 11 Expansion at Plant No . 2, Job No . P2-ll -1. See page 11 F 11 . a.nd 11 G 11 Considerat ion of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recom.rnendation, and c .\e. awarding purchase of UHF Two -way Rad io System , "\' Specification No . E-060 , to Moto rola C & E , / Inc ., in the amount of $1 7,563,35 . See page 11 H 11 . Consideration of motion approving Cha.nffie Order No . 2 to Sedimentation Ba.sins 11 L and 11M.11 and Digesters 11 L 11 and 11M11 and Plant No. 2, Job No . P2 -19 , authorizing an addition of $1 2,076 .00, to the contract with J .E . Hoagland and W. W. Hoagland", Contractor . See page 11 r '' Consideration of motion ratifying actions of the Director of Finance in emergency purch ase of material and services for repair of sewag e pump at Reclamation Plant No . 1 recirculation pump stat ion, from Johnson Pump Company in the amount of $3 ,100 plus tax and freight Consideration of motion authorizing t he General Manager to designate ten e mp loyee s (not to exceed three days attendance per individual) to attend the Water Pollution Control F~deration conference at San Francisco, October 3 -8; and authorizing reimbursement fo r travel, meals, lodging and incidental expens es incurred Consideration of Resolution No . 71 -lll~, ordering value of certain abandoned 01· ren1ov~d structures and equipment removed from the Dis tricts ' books of account • See pa.ge 'lJ 11 -2- . (9) ALL DIST PJCTS Consideration of item s d e l eted from consent calendar , if ?-ny ALL DIS'rRICTS Consideration o f motion accep ting proposal of Ocean Science and EYlgineering, Inc ., dated Au gus t 23, 1 971, V / for preparation of Env i ro n~e ntal I mp act Statemen t for ~ 1 971-72 treatment p l ants improv ements projects . See v page 11 K11 • (\1 ) ~. (12 ) (13) (1 6) \ (17) N\\S AL DISTRI TS , ·· . eport of eneral Counsel coterning liti~at io n ~ith t he City of Hunt i ngt on Be a ch n connectio wit h ;&uting of No . I -8 , Int rplant Influent I terceptor AL L DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to employ Clark Miller to act as co-counsellor with C. Arthur Nisson, Gen eral Counsel , in the matter of County Sanitation Districts v . City of Hu nti n~ton Beach in regard to J ob No . I -8 at the rate of $45 per h our for work out of court and $250 p e r day for c our t appearances and actual out of pocket expenses, if any, and tha t t his employment be retroactive to t he 1 1th day of August, 1 971 ALL D::LST RI CTS Co sideration of motion to receive and file bid abul ation and rec omme ndation recognizing Ko r dick and Rados , a Join t Venture, as low bidder, on Interplant Influent ·Interceptor , Job No . I.-8; and c onsideration of Re solution No . 7 1-115 , amending Resolution No . 71-8 0, a pp roving p lans and specificat ions for subject contract, by condit i oning award of contract upon receipt of rec ommendation of the General Cou ns e l. See page s 11 L 11 and 'M.11 ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file certification c of the General Manage r that he has checked a ll bills appeari ng -.::>on the a genda, found them to be in order, a nd that h e recommends authorization for payment ALL DISTRICTS onside ration o f rol l call vote motion approving Joint Operating and Cap ital Outlay Revo l ving warrant books for signature of the Chairman of Dis trict No . l? and ~uthorizing payment of claims lis ted on page 'A" ALL DISTRICTS Other business and c ommun i cations (a) Consideration of mot ion authori zing the Gen eral Manager to designate one employee to at t end the Un i versity of Ca lifornia at Davi s F ish Disease and Pathology course, Octobe r 18th through 22 ; and authorizing reimbursement for trave l, meals , l od ging , registration and incidental expenses DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Consideration of motion approving suspense fund warrants, . if any (1 8 ) DISTRICT 1 . Consideration o f mot :Lon auth orizing payment to the City c_ of Santa Ana for relocat i on of two water mains , in .JConnection with construction of Co n tract No . 1 -12 , i n an amount no t to exceed $5,200 " -3- ( 2 0 ) D~~hR ~C~u!i~ and co~ation~,f ailw (2 1) DIS TR ICT 1 •· ·~tion of motion to adjourn to September 30 , 1 971, V a t~ p .m. ~:5Q (22) I STR CT 2 tNvev c 23) DIST RI CT 2 Other business and communications , if any approv ing ~rants ,~ a~ ( 24 VnISTRI CT 2 V -Consideration of motion to adjourn i ; 00 (~5) ISTRICTS 3 & 11 Consideration of motion approving suspe~se\fund warrants, i f any . See page "B 11 ('() I~ Ji. 3 ('I\ s # I( (.26) DIS TRI CT 3 C sidera,tion of mo t ion approving Change Order No . l, the nlans and specifications for Be ac h Re lief· Trunk AA er, Reaches 17,-18&·19, Contract No . 3-16 , authorizing [~' addit ion of $1,148 .23, to the contract wit h Me rco Construction Engineers , Inc ., Contractor . See p age 11 N11 ---- (27) DI STRICT 3 • ..~ Consideration of mo t i on approving warrants , if any . ~ \'1 See page 11 B 11 ess and ~icati~ i( ~ny ( 29 ) ;QT _R I CT 3 ~Consideration of motion to adjourn (30) \~\\:.~ / (32) I STRICT 5 Cons:i.deration of proposal from Shuirrnan-Simpson, dated r\J.> Septembe r 1, 197 1, for eng i neering services in connection : '/ with up dating cost information for sewerage fac ilities V' r equired to serve ultimate needs of the Dist ric t in an amount not to exceed $1,500 .00. See page · 11 0 11 mo tion approving warrants , if any . ess ~1 d co~nicati~, i:i\.an~ DIS TRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 6 Conside ration ~oti on e po.ge "c "_ ~ approvi g warra\s , i f any . -4- (35) T 6 ~ " usines~nd I STRICT 6 Consideration of motion t o adjourn B'/) ~ DI STRICT 1 1 C sideration of Resolution No . 7 1 -116 -11, authorizing -t'~'\e nitiation of proceedings to annex ter rito ry to the ~ District (Ann exation No . 1 5 -Signal Bo lsa #1 Annexation). See page 11 P 11 DIST RICT 1 ~ 4 Considerat ·on of mo ·on appro~g warra ~s , if any . page I c II • -'----u'C: ~ (38 ) (39) DI STRIC 11 ~ ~. ~ Other a.n:~ommun ica~ns , .~ a'~ J (4~DI STRICT 11 ~· · Consideration of motion to adjourn ~ ~ O Cf (41) DI STRICT 7 Co nsideration of Resolut ion No . 71-117-7, approving plans ~rJ"'· \r and specifications for Re dhill Interceptor, Reaches 6 , 7 , ~-cl\ ~ and 8 , Cont ract No . 7-6-4, and authorizing advertising V 1 ' ~or blds to be open ed October 19, 1 971 at 11:00 a .m. V See page 11 Q11 (42 ) DISTRICT 7. nsideration of motion approving Change Order No . 2 to he plans and specifications for Sunflower Interceptor, ach 2 , Contract .No . 7 -6 -2 , authorizing an addition of ,142 .00 , to the contract with Ernest E . Pestana, Inc ., Contractor. See page 11 R 11 e DIST RICT 7 / Discussion re Petition for Annexation of Tentative Tract No . 7389 (44) (45) (46) DI STRICT 7 Consideration of m otio~ ~pproving warra nts, if any . See page 11 c 11 M \.5 DIST . T 7 ~~ _ . Ot her usiness a~ommun i~ions~if any"' DIS TRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn to September 30 , 1 971 at 1+:-39-p .m. 5."r:'J \) °\ ~~C> 0 -5 - I .. •• #23 -Report of General Manager on Chino Basin participation awaiting report of t he ir engineers on feasability of participation - stated that they are very interested in project and would like thing to move along as quickly as possible -Parsons -What is the water quality board doing about Riverside participation? Green -read article in Riverside paper about pollution of Santa Ana River -MIDLX are upstream agencies ~~Nl1i~ dumping untreated sewage into River and polluting Orange County 's water? Smith -Does Chino Basin have money avail a ble to use in participation with us on construction of line? GM -They have $500 ,000 this year and $5 million in unsold ~ f bonds that their bond attorney's advise them can be used to finance their share of construction of this line . -1 •• .. Yes they will be using the LA same Miller -Back to this pollution of Santa Ana River, is this is fact can we write the WQCB a letter and ask if it is true and _ ~ what will be done about it? '")) Parsons -Perhaps Mr . Battin could get the County Health involved tn this . Battin -If board will have a resolution prepared, put on agenda and then directed to BOS , it can then be prepented to BOS Parsons -Maybe this could be done by Dis tricts on staff l eve l with participation with our GM and GM of Oran ge County Water District - with staff following through to check facts and see if this newspaper article true instruct staff to get true information and take steps to notify BOS , WD and WQCB -whatever steps are necess a ry upon investigation -resolution ~ drawn up if facts deem it necessary #43 -Ray E. Lewis -Review proposed method of sewering this tract -drew sketch of acreage proposed to be annexed -in Mas ter Plan considered a R-1 development -property divided into two sections -one section drain southerly the other westerly -by letting 10 acre section drain ~ southerly instead of westerl y, mi ght jepardize commitments to properti es ~ currentl y in District -current plans call for relieve line to be built in five years -might be needed sooner if annexations of this type overload line Evans -total of 37 acres -submitted tentat i ve design and received tentative approval -as condition had to purchase access (condition for cou.ilty zoning) -Contractor would have no objection into going into line filfXIDUq~ in Chapman being built by City of Orange but does not want to annex to City of Orange as a condition for using line therefore would like to take sewer out to the west. ... Maridayle Peay -estate is behind on death t a xes, etc . because of hold ~fili up on this property . 17 beneficiaries on this estate -this estate must close quickly as possible Miller -Does not know what commitments were made to developer - staff does not have authority to make commitments -does not fee l that we shoul d let thlfiln annex since density is so much more than anticipated in master plan Smith -XKXX:Xfil{~X City of Orange is interested in serving development -the newline being put in can be used by only a limited amount of property -this is one area that can be served by this line -feels that any property that can logically and efficiently be li.XK served by this line should be done so - shouldn 't over tax other systems since capacity is available elsewhere -City of Orange engineers and Districts engineers state that this aretshould be served by Chapman line and feels that we should abide by decision of engineers Miller -Big issue here is what kind of capacity, in density, the Di strict should allow to annex -under master plan XM~KIDC does not include this type of density development Griset -How many acres in this general area are not in District now -probably hundreds -in order for them to come in is it l- poss i b l e for us to make this type of deal l ike we did with Riverside where they pay for their share of capacity in line? Hohener -Explained how master plan was based on land usage according to Cities and County plans -some medium density and commerical property mostly R-1 -master plan trunk lines were based on these flows without upgrading -if entire area were give R-4 zoning are master p l an facilities would not be adequate . If onl y some areas go R-4 possibly by making adjustments to proposed master plan facilit i es, the load could be aandled . Lew i s -Staff looking for guidance and direction as to policy with ~MX~M regard to not only this annexation ~X but future ones of this type as well Mil l er -Must get to basic problem -increase of dens i ty -wh at does Di strict propose to do about this? Smith -Position of City that engineers recommendation must be followed Evans -Talked to City Engineers, City Manager, etc. -they (the contractor ) sti ll objects to annexation to the City of Orange at this time Miller -Moved that this matter be contined until District , ~ letter from Ci ty of Orange as to their position on density ·in areas currently not in the District -if City of Orange does not object to high density and allows it to go through on these areas feels tha t the Distri ct must make plans accordingl y -if City does not have XH~~ their position by September 30th -alright with him Evans -Application for zoning made in September a ast year and approved in February this year -feels that the District shoul d;determine the u l t i mate zoni ng of property -that not Board of Supervisors does this -doesn 't fee l that zoning is even an issue as far as these Boards go Smith -City of Orange can give policy decision in couple of weeks ~ ( Miller -interested in ~~li~MN: precedent this sets for District - feels that high density request -is n ot an isolated incident - must look at total problem not just this 1 0 acres Cu l ver -What XIK is the objection to annexing to City of Orange? Evans -Court has given to October 1 7th to complet sale of property -timing of this does not allow for annexing to City of Orange Miller -R-laniexati on would present no problem as far as he is concerned and is sure rest of board wou l d approved R-1 annexation R-4 annexation makes value of land and estate approx . triple - XHaXXK that is what estate wants Nisson -possibility of start bui lding in County with R-4 zonging and indicate that they will annex to city of Orange later date - can still have zoning is building has started Griset -on annexations, do you accept existing county zoning ? Smith -if building is under way, yes Evans -Offer to annex 1 0 acres after building starts but will not offer to annex the other 27 acres Smith -then you will probably not get the 1 0 acre annexation Wedaa -Would like to request that when this subject is brought up again it be brought before the joint boards -feels this type of problem can come up in any district and s h ould be heard by all - Just -up to Chairman of District No . 7 Mille r -Willing to do this at next regular meeting early in agenda Smith -Do you want Orange Planning Dire ctor to attand Miller -That is up to y ou .. The Joint Chairman recognized Director Hemeon who commented on the book entitled "Earth Abides" which emphasis accomplishments of providing vital public services for whi c·h the public is generally unaware and urged that all Directors read the book. #7 -The General Counse l reported on litigation with the City of Huntington Beach in connection with routing of Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8 and advised that the court had issued a writ of mandate ordering the City to issue an excavation permit for the Brookhurst alignment. #10 -Following a report by the General Manager in connection with preparation of Environmental Impact Statements required state and federal grant applications, it was moved , seconded and MI:j duly carried : That the Joint Chairman be authorized to ~~!M.XX:X~ appoint a special committee to interview firms experienced in the prepartion of Water Quality Control Environmental Impact statements;and,XM~XX~X~IDiX ... ~XXXM6! FURTHER MOVED : That said committee be authorized to award contract for ~X prepartion of environmental impact statements on 1971-72 treatment plant improvements projects in an amount not to exceed $6,000. Joint Chairman Just then appointed the following Directors to said committee : Henry Wed aa, Chairman, Lindsley Parsons and Norman Culver #23 -The General Manage r reported on the proposed participation in the Santa Ana River Interceptor project by the Chino Bas:lil.n Municipal Water District. Following a lengthy discussion concerning the quality of water being discharged into the Santa Ana River by up stream agencies, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the staff be directed to study the matter and draft a resolution for the Boards conaideration in connection with control of said water quality, if appropriate. I p ---.--I 4 ' .. I -I - •I .· RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS September 8, 1971 -7:30 p.m • . . .- WARRANT. NO. 16179 16180 16181 \ -2182 ~183 16184 16185 16186 · 16187 16188 16189 16190 16191 16192 16193. 16194 16195 16196 16197 16198 16199 16200 16201 16202 16203 16204 16205 16206 ,6207 ~208 16209 16210 16211 16212 16213 16214 16215 16216 16217 16218 16219 16220 16221 16222 16223 16224 16225 16226 16227 16228 16229 16230 16231 , 6232 V233 16234 16235 16236 16237 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF AMI Adept Mfg. Inc., Pump Parts $ . R. P. Adams Co., Inc., Gaskets All Bearing Service, Inc., Pump Parts Allied Bolt & Supply Co., Small .. Hardware. Alpine Aromatics, Inc., Odor Control Chemicals ~ank of America, Bond Coupon Coilection Expense· Ame~ican Cyanamid Co., Chemicals City of Anaheim, Power Anaheim Sewer Construction, Lateral Repair The Anchor Packing Co., Pump Packing Angelus Quarries, Bldg. Material Aquatic Center, Air Test · Assoc. of Official Analytical Chemists, Tech. Manual Behr Process Corp., Paint Supplies Bell Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe Supplies Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Magneto Repair Brenner-Fiedler & Assoc., New Compressor C & R Reconditioning Co., Pump & Engine Repairs California Collator Sales, Binding Supplies Cano~ Electronic Products Co., Calculator Repairs Certified Laboratories, Inc., Insecticide Chem Star Co., Resins College Lumber Co., Inc., Small Hardware Consolidated Elect~ Dist., Inc., Electrical Supplies Consolidated Freightways, Freight Constructors Supply Co., Small Tools Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa County Water Dist., Water Curtin Scientific Co., Lab Supplies Richard M. Day, Reimburse OJT Instruction Diesel Control Corp., Engine Parts Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Electric Machinery Mfg. Co., Electrical Equipment Electric Supplies Dist. Co., Electrical Supplies Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring Engineers Sales-Service Co., Pump Parts ·Enterprise Printing Co., Specification Supplies Filter Supply Co., Filters Fischer & Porter Co., Meter Repair Fisher Controls Co., Compressor Parts Fowler Equipment, Inc., Equipment Rental 'Freeway Machine & Welding Shop, Machining Friden Div., The Singer Co., Mtce. Agreement Gaines Electric Supply Co., Dist. Electrical Equip. . Garden Grove Lumber & Cement Co., Bldg. Material General Electric Supply Co., Electrical Supplies . General Telephone Co. (2 Mos.) · · Georgia-Pacific Corp., Chlorine Bob Gosche Co., Small Hardware Halsted & Hoggan, Inc., New Pump Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting & C.O.D. Expenses Harron, Rickard & McCone Co4, Equipment Rental Hinde Engineering Co., Water Meter Honeywell, Inc., Controls Howard Supply Co., Valves, Pipe Supplies City of Huntington Beach, Water Instra Service, Inc., Microscope Repair Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Piping Supplies Kelly Pipe Co., Valves A-1 AMOUNT 714.00 29.46 256.96 394.33 273.00 608.46 li4.88 12.50 75.00 266.73 47.19 8.oo 30.00 56.15 93.88 99.66 175.98 522.50 182.58 65.00 216.33 182.18 47.10 1,449.36 11.64 159.09 390.90 6.00 345·. 98 15.00 352.31 74.97 462.00 993.89 2,400.00 102.69 58.75 303.32 103.00 19.49 178.50 18.oo 28.50 2,985.15 196.68 647.92 1,776.05. 8,810.28 129.37 519.23 109.93 121.38 180.98 59.44 1,116.64 72.26 237.59 2,223.26 497.83 "· . r WARRANT NO. 16238 16239 16240 16241 16242 .. 6243 ~244 16245 16246 16247 ·· 16248 16249 16250 16251 16252 16253 16254. 16255 16256 16257 16258 16259 16260 16261 16262 16263 16264 16265 16266 16267 ,6268 '-'6269 16270 16271 16272 16273 16274 16275 16276 16277 16278 16279 16280 16281 16282 16283 16284 16285 16286 16287 16288 16289 16290 16291 16292 1 6293 ·~294 16295 16296 16297 16298 IN FAVOR OF Keuffel & Esser Co., Reproduction Supplies King :Bearing, .Inc., Bearings, New Motor Kleen-Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies Knox Industri~l Supplies, Small Hardware. LBWS, Inc., Small Tools, Welding Supplies L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Service Judy Lee, Employee Mileage . .. Lewis Bros. Battery., Truck Batteries Kris Lindstrom, Employee Mileage Link-Belt, Dewatering Equipment Los Angeles Chemical Co., Insecticide A. J. Lynch & Co., Lab Equipment McCoy Ford Tractor, Tractor Parts Mesa Supply, Truck Parts · . $ Marine Biological Consultants, Inc., Ecological Survey Metropolitan Supply Co., Pipe Fittings Herbert L. Miller, Inc., Tires E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings NCR Systemedia Division, Forms Nalco Chemical Co., Solvents Nate'p Saw & Lawnmower Shop Inc., Sharpening National Chemsearch Corp., Solvents National Concrete Sawing Inc., Core Drilling C. Arthur Nission, General ·Counsel Retainer R. J. Noble Co., Pavement Repair .Oakite Products, Inc., Cleaning Compound- Olander's Welding Shop, Machining Kelly Olguin, Woodward Gov'r. Conference Reimb. City.of Orange, Water Orange County Chemical Co., Solvents Orange County Radiotelephone Orange County Stamp Co., Rubber Stamp orange County Wholesale Electric, Electrical Supplies Oreo Block Co., Inc., Bldg. Material Pacific FGrwarding Co., Inc., Freight Pacific Telephone Pearson Cabinet, Lab Equipment Perkin-Elmer Corp., Lab Equipment ·John J. Phillips, District Inspection Services Postmaster, Postage The Lee Potter Co., Inc., Sealer Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage .Pryor-Giggey Co., Thermal Cement Bernard T. Redican, District Inspection Services The Register, Employment Ad. Reichel Electric, Inc., Refund Mailing Fee Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Steel & Aluminum Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Parts .Roseburrough Tool, Inc., Bldg. Supplies Bob Rubins Co., Small Hardware Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Santa Ana Electric Motors, New Motor Santa Electronics Co., Electrical Supplies Scientific Products, Lab Supplies ·S. F. Serrantino, Employee Mileage Sherwin-Williams Co., Paint Supplies John Sigler, Empl. Mileage & Reimb. OJT Instr. Signal Flash Co., Inc., Barricade Rental Smallcomb Electric Co., Electrical Supplies Smith Bros. Co., Metal Work Southern California Water Co. A-2 AMOUNT 337.79 634.53 280.34 50.32 1,455.51 l,843.i8 13.05 . 121.59 16.50 1,384.98 35.07 294.17 . :6.42 121.17 1,726.50 215.89 137.63 189.00 170.92 150.73 4.95 284.29 205.00 700.00 .88.57 99.91 38. 64· 108.56 37.66 io .. a1 344.81 9.24 84.10 18.16 16.89 365.02 997.50 166.97 973.70 200.00 383.45 36.18 168.oo 1,327.55 71.22 5.00 245.35 ·1,224.97 13.65 25.28 49.04 413.82 54.97 1,625.01 . 8.40 156.46 1,262.47 9.12 65.76 70.25 3.84 WARRANT NO. 16299. 16300 16301 16302 16303 1 6304 ~305 16306 16307 16308 ·16309 16310 16311 16312 16313 16314 16315. 1631p 16317 16318 16319 16320 16321 16322 16323 16324 16325 16326 16327 16328 16329 '330 'y6331 16332 16333 16334 16335 16336 16337 16338 16339 IN FAVOR OF · Southern California Edison Co. . · $ Southern California ·aas Co. Southwest Flexible Co., Line Clean Equipment Sparkletts, Bottled Water Speed-E-Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Oil Co., Engine Oil & Gasoline Surplus Sales, Used Control Panel ··surveyors. Service Co. , Equipment Rental Thomas Bros. Maps, Atlas C. 6. Thompson Petroleum Co., Weed Oil & Solvents F. H. Toppin Co., Vacuum Repairs Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Steel Tustin Plumbing & Heating, Lateral Repair · Union Oil Co., Gasoline · . Van Waters & Rogers, Lab Supplies . vaniman camera, Photo Processing & Supplies Varec, Inc., Freight . Vireo Mfg. Corp., Office Equipment John R. Waples R. s., Odor Consultant Ward & Harrington Lumber Co., Bldg. Material Guy L~ warden & Sons, Electrical Supplies Warren~ Bailey Co., Inc., Tubing & Check Valves H. s. Watson Co., Drive Shaft Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc., Engine Parts Robert A. Webber, Employee Mileage G. M. Wesner, Reimburse OJT Instruction ·western Belting, Small Hardware Western Salt Co., Salt Willig Equipment, Tractor Parts Wi.lson Engine & Equipment Co., Engine Parts Mike Wilson, Mileage & Reimburse OJT Instruction c. R. Wirth Gas Equipment Co., Fittings Bruce Witcher, Reimburse OJT Instruction Russ Wold, Employee Mileage World Travel Bureau, Inc., Meeting & Conference Travel Worthington Corp.~ Pump Parts Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage Xerox. Corp., Reproduction Service ·Everett H. York Co., Filters Zep Mfg. Co., Solvents Zodiac, Reproduction Supplies AMOUNT 13,396.51 309.54 96.05 76.46 500.15 1,229.65 1,102.50 60.00 . i6.21 282.45 14.73 187.44 150.00 16.50 .53.13 ·195.08 5.35 106.79 259.00 275.33 84.53 245.61 379.64 2,812.90 15.75 l5.00 95.55. 32.03 80.25 558.90 40~50 69.23 30.00 9:t..68 177.20 810.69 64.50 315.00 90.72 42.41 251.38 'TOTAL JOINT OPERATING $. 77,425.51 A-3 .. WARRANT-NO • . 16340 16341 16342 \_ ~16343 ~6344 16345 16346 , 16347 16348 I 16349 16350 16351 16352 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Serv. -Plant Const. orange Coast Daily Pilot, Bi.d Notice E-060 · Freedom Newspapers, Inc., Bid Notice P2-ll-l, I-8 Healy-Tibbits Const. Co., Contrjctor I-7-3 .J. Putnam Henc~, Contractor P2-17 ·J.E. Hoagland & W.W. Hoagland, Contractor P2-19· · Hood Corp., Contractor Pl-15/P2-15 Peter Kiewit Sons' Co., Contractor J-10 Clark Miller, Legal Services I-8 Near-Cal Corp., Contractor J-11 C. Arthur· Nisson, Legal S~rvices I-8 Twining Labs, Tesing P2-19, P2-1R-l & P2-17 F. T. Ziebarth, Contractor Pl-lR-1 & P2-1R-l TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING ' TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF A-4 AMOUNT $ .23,623.02 6.00 172.01 . 3,846. 91 . ·. 73,366.02 160,232.40 50,959.28 464,346.01 340.00 22,920.97 299.00 100.50 12,927.60 $ 813,139.72 $ 890,565.23 BISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 1635~ C0ok & Barletta Inc., C0ntractor 3-15 16354 16355 . ~6356 16357 16~58 1.6~59 . 16~60 16361 16362 16363 . . ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF B~yle Engineering, Engr. Serv. 3-16, 3-18 Mere~ c~nstruction Engr., Contractor 3-16 John W. Stang Corp., Contract 3-12-A Twining Lanoratories, Testing 3-16 DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS ·IN FAVOR OF .. B~yle Engineering, Engineering Services 3-17 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS · IN FAVOR OF City ')f NeW9ort Beach, Connection Charge Admin. FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF· Bayside Village, Easement Rent 5-18 Newo~rt Hills Inc., Big Canyon Reimb • Twining Laboratories, Testing 5-18 Zurn Engineers, Contractor 5-18 -B- .Agrm. AMOUNT $ . 9,600. 74 $ ll,562.25 80,011.34 3,279.15 22.80 ·$ 94,875.54 $104,476.28 $ . 8, 025. 50 $ 552.00 $ 8,277.00 21,975.00 13 .• 90. 40,770.12 $ 71,036.02 $ 71, 588.02· WARRANT NO. 16~64 16365 16366 16367 16368 16369 16370 16371 16372 16373 16374 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT B'.°')yle Engineering, Engineering Se:r·vices $ Title Insurance & Trust Co., Easement Reports AD# 9 51.00 37.50 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARR.ANTS IN FAVOR OF Fl~yd R~per, ·Permit Refund CONSTRUCTION FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF B~yle Engineering, Engineering Services 7-6-3 Jeffries _Banknote Co., Bond Printing DISTRICTS NOS. 1 & 7 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF B~yle Engineering, Engr. Serv. 7-6-1, 7-6-2 c~unty ~f Orange, Testing 7-6-1, 7-6-2, 7-6-2A Osb~rne Laboratories Inc., Testing 7-6-2 Ernest E. Pestana Inc., Contractor 7-6-2 c. J. Segerstrom & Sons, Temporary Easement 7-6-1, 7 -6-2 . Sully Miller Contracting Co., Contractor 7-6-1 -C- $ 88.50 $ 177.40 $ l0,680.00 605.85 $ 11,285.85 $ 11,551.75 $ 4,373.00 i;o62.91 50.00 143,128.80 1,258.40 431,937.00 $581,810.11 RESOLUTION NOo 71-113 APPROVING PLANS AND. SPECIFICATIONS FOR. JOB NO. Pl-3-l A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOSo l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALI~ORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICAT~QNS·· FOR ODOR CONTBOL AND Il11PROVED INFLUENT SCREENING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT N0 0 1, JOB NOo Pl-3-1 ~ * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Distrfcts Nos·o 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND. ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Johl:l Carollo Engineers;· Districts' engineers_,: for construction of Odor Control and Improved Influent Screening Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-3-1, are hereby approved;. and, Section 2o That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety.Code of t~e State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m., October 5, 1971, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, S'ection L~. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' Engineers be authorized·to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors; and, .... Section 5. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized to award contract for said work on behalf of these Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 9, 1971. Agenda Item #B(a) -D-All. Districts .. . ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO SPECIFICATIONS AND PLANS FOR . INTERP.LANT L~FLUENT INTERCEPTOR . JOB NO. I-8 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OR.ANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA August 17, 1971 DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS. I. Page 18-2, (2) Cla.sscs,-Add the following paragraph: \,,,,,): A. .......,; . B. Should the Contractor elect to increase D-load of the pipe, said increase shall be in proportion to the square of the ratio of increased trench width to maximum trench width indicated O:l the Plans except the D-load need not be increased beyond the following .tabulated values due to trench condition transition to e1nbankrnent condition. PLANS Pipe Size and Minimum D-load Indicated O:l Plans 96 11 -1300 96" -1450 96" -2000 7811 1500 7811 -1750 Maximum D-load required if Trench Width is Increased 1300 1'150 2500 1550 2100 I. Sheet. 24 of 43. Where select material is indicated. for filling excavated area in. pipe bedding details P and R, the Contractor may use gravel bedding in lieu of select material. . The lo:wer two foot layer of select material o~ gravel bedding shown in details P and R shall be compacted to not less .than 85 percent of maxim.um density for the upper 6 inches only in lieu of the 24 inches indicated. Add the following note to the detail entitled ENLARGED TRENCH: "Concrete bedding is not required if D-load of pipe is increased as specified under ite1n A, I above." C. ADDENDU:tv1 NO. 1, ITE11 C, ill, {a) . Delete the revised paragraph under item (a) in its entirety and '= substitute the following: 11 Thc tunnel liner plates may be either a 2-flange lap type or a 4-flange type Arinco, Commercial Shearing and stamping Co1npany, Republic, or approved equal. 'The liner plate for the 96-inch pipe shall have a moment of inertia of not less than O. 047 inches to the fourth ."power per inch, and a minimum thickness of 0. 13 45 inches for the .2-flange lap type and shall have a moment of inertia of not less than O. 069 inches to the fourth power per inch, and a ininimum thickness of O. 164 inches for the 4-flange type. The liner plate for the 48-inch .pipe shall have a minimum thickness of O. 1046 inches for either 2-fiange lap type or 4-flange type. Agenda Item #8(b) -E-All Districts .. ·-..--.... " \w) . '-11" ' . ·. ~-:. --------·· ··----·-.. August 20, 1971 A. PLANS ADDENDUM NO. 1 ·To SPECIFICATIONS AND PLANS FOR HEADWORKS ''C" EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. PZ-11-1 COUNTY. SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORN~ I. Drawing No. S-1, Section C .. . . . Raise the 20" fiberglass foul air du.ct on the west wall of the bar screen .enclosure 6-inches above the elevations shown. II. Drawing No. S-4 Section A .. Belt guard on new foul air fan E shall be such that it will not interfere with existing aluminum plate. Ill. Drawing No. P-1, Plan A. Drainage curb and concrete damaged in extending existing curb shall be painted with epoxy tile. IV. Drawing No. P-6, Plan A. Add protective fiberglass covers for the insulated 4-inch B.S.P. cooling water return in two places. Covers shall be sil:nilar to existing covers and approximately fifteen feet long. For engine oil cooling the one and a half inch G.S. P. plant : = water piping shall be piped through two one and a half inch gate valves and o:ie and a half inch solenoid valve with bypass piping and one and a half inch gate valve to two one and a quarter inch gfobe valves to engine oil ·coolers on each engine. One and a quarter inch G. S. P. shaU be led ~o adjacent equipment drain. For gear box oil cooling the o:ie inch G: S. P. piping shall be piped from the one-inch plant water pipe adja.cent to the new right angle drive gears through two one-inch gate valves and one-inch solenoid valve with bypass piping and one-inch gate valve to one-inch globe valve and :1.ence to oil cooler for gear drives. One-inch G.S.P. shall be led to adjacent equip- ment drain. Cooling piping is required for. both g~ar boxes. Flame trap and two-inch plug valve on natural gas fuel line to engines shall be located below floor at elevatio.:i 7. 00 and shall be compl~te with support. ~oad adjuster and '~zero" r~gulator shown in diagram on Drawii~g P-7 shall be· loc.ated· . above floor at elevation 7 e 00. Agenda Item #B(c..L All Districts ·.· . . . L--' ... . ·· • + ··--·--:------··-...... ___ ·~···-·------·--------·---·-··.·· ·-·~-····-.. -·---· .. ·····~--·· -·····- .· ADDENDUM NO. 1 -JOB NO. PZ~ll-1 August 20, 1971 Page Z ·of 2 v. Vl. Drawing No. P-6, Section B . . 2 11 x 3 11 pressure relief valve on extension pipe 'from steam· .separator shall be 2-1/2 11 x 4". · · A water leg shall be provided in the 3-in.ch Y.S.P •. condensate return from the hot v.rater convertor. Drawing No. P-7, Engine cooling and heat recovery_system flow diagram. \ Two -inch cooling water return shall be connected to ho4; water inlet of steam separator, not to the makeµp. yalve as shown. · Vll. Drawing No. A-4, Section B. One of the stem guides shown on the concrete portion of ~he tower is actually on the steel shell. Gate manufacturer shall verify that spacing of the stem guides is satisfactory for. · the operation of the new gate. VIII. Drawing E-2, Nameplate Legend IX. Lege:nd shall be modified to read N4~9 Heater. Drawing E-1, Plan A<fd adjacent to existing Bub'!:>ler Control on discharge channel the note "Run 2 -#12, 3/4" C from float switch to bubbler ·control. See Drawing P-1. 11 B. DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS :: I. Page 32-11, Section 32-2 (b) 16. .. · ...... _ VIBRATION.· In the second par~grap'!l change "The pump in place shall not vibrate more than O. 004 . amplitude inch ••• " to'The pump in place shall not vibrate more than o. 008 amplitude inch ••• 11 In the third paragraph change '·'in excess ·of O. 004, ••• " to "in ~xcess of O. 008, ••• " JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS . F-2 All Districts : ' ;~ . "' Engineer's Estimate $1,200,000 . . . B I D TABULATJON S H E E T Date September l, 1971 .Contract: Headworks "C" Expansion at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2-ll-l Contractor 1. E.T.I. & Kordick, A Joint Venture 9778 Wes~ Katella, Suite 103 Anaheim, California 92804 2. Ziebarth and Alper 212-05 Balsa Street Torrance, California 3. 4. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. I. Putnam Henck, A Corporation . 550 West 40th Street (P. O. Box 2476) San Bernardino, California 92406 Climate Conditioning Corp. 10560 Fern Avenue Stanton, CalLfornia ~0680 c. Harper Construction Company, Inc. 1209 West 190th Street Gardena, California 90248 •. Total Bid $1,228,000. $1,315,700. $1,355,000. .$1,413,966. $1,588,600. Agenda Item No. 8(c) -G-All Districts 11:00 AM B I D TABULATION .Date: August 30~ 1971 Contract for: 1. 2. 3. 4. UHF TWO-WAY RADIO SYSTEM SPECIFICATION NOo E-060 BIDDER Motorola C & E, Inc. 2333 Utah Avenue El Segundo, California Mobile Radio, Inc~ 11819 Burke Street Santa Fe Sprin~s, Calif. RCA Corp. Commercial Systems 6363 Sunset Boulevard Hollywood, California Orange County Radio Telephone Po O. Box 954 Santa Ana, Cal:Lf ornia BID AMOUNT $16,762.00 19,557.00 16,076.00 * * * * * * * * * * * :: PLUS 5% SALES TAX $801.35 977.85 780.97 TOTAL BID 20,534.85 16,856.97* No Bid * I have evaluated the bids for the above equipment and determined that the bid of BCA Commercial Electronics Systems Division does not comply with the specifications for said equipment and, therefore, recommend that the l:Ii..d of RCA Commercial Electronics Systems Division in the amount of $16,856.97 be rejected and award be made to Motorola C & E, Inc., 2333 Utah Avenue, El Segundo, California, in the amount of $17,563.35, as the lowest and best bidder meeting the specifications. Agenda Item No. 8(d) William No Clarke Maintenance Superintendent H-1 All.Districts •. .• August 26, 1971 MEMORANDUM TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (71..C) 962-2411 FROM: William N. Clarke, Superintendent of Maintenance SUBJECT: UHF Two-Way Radio System· .The purpose of this memorandum is to present all the basic facts regarding the Districts' need, plans, and uses for a two-way mobile radio system. -- As you know, at present we are leasing mobile.radio telephone service .. We have seven units which cost the Districts $300. per month on this lease basis. This totals $3,600. a year. The cost of the system ~ that is proposed for the Districts will include 13 mobile units at an estimated $20,000. In am~rtizing this new system on an equal basis of units, it will pay out in three years. The present .lea~ed system has some faults; those being, very busy air time and long waits and not enough units available for the complete crew's usage. The proposed system has been evaluated in consultation with Max Elliott and Paul Moses of the Orange County Communication Center. The County of Orange has done much testing on this type of system. It is felt that the.UHF system which is proposed is necessary to give the coverage required by the Districts. The proposed system will allow communica- tion with field crews·whic~ will enable faster response in the event of problems auch as line stoppages, subsidences, power outages at pumping stations, the scheduling of field inspectors, and will aid in the routine duties of field crews. This system wil.l give direct feed- back from field personnel to supervisory personnel; on-the-spot reports of. situations as they occur. Many of the situations now require a direct visit by the department supervisor or department head or a visit and return report by field personnel. It is felt that with this radio ·system, sufficient inform~tion will be available to facilitate decisions being mad~ in a large percentage of these instances . . A full field test was run using this type of ~quipment. The test was conducted by our Electric.al Supervisor; Mr •. Roy Pendergraft. A crane ~with a 110 foot boom was rented an~ erected -in our yard. A: field test ·.covering all o~ Orang~ County that is under our jurisdiction was ~:· _successfully·completed.· Sevefal diff~rent radio frequencies ~ere . Used and ~everal differe~t strengths of transmission. and receivers . were used. Spectfications have been ·written around those which·pr8ved l.7 _Q 11 ··- P.11 Districts Memorandum To: Fred A. Harper \_,) Page 2 .; '" --~ successful in .this test. The Orange County Coordinating Committee has been consulted and has approved the frequency reque~ts made by the Districts. We have applied for and received an· Fee license to broadcast on UHJ'. frequencies as of July, 1971. Specifications have been prepared for the radio system and advertised.· Bids will be received on August 30th at 11:00 a.m~ A recommendation will be forthcoming for award at the September 8th Board Meeting. · i WNC:rb A ~enda Item No. (~ ( d) William N. Clarke Superintendent of Maintenance. .· .. ·:-- H-3 All Distrj_cts •· COUNTY S:'\HITATIOi~ DISTRICTS OF OR!\UGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 812'7 -l0(2L~4 Ellis A ver:ue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C .0. NO. 2 ------- CONTRJ\CTOR: J. E. HOAGLAND & W. W. HOAGLAND DATE: September 8, 1971 { A Joint Venture) JOB: SEDIMENTATION BASINS "L"&"M" and DIGESTERS ·"L"&"M" AT PLANT NO, 2, JOB NO. P2-19 Amount of this change order (ADD) (JOEl)~) ·$ __ 12_, ___ 0 ___ 76_~_0_0_ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the cont~act and/or contract \Wrk arc J:lereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. . . REFERENCE: Contractor's letter dated August 5, 1971., August 20, 1971 Districts' letter dated July 14,. 1971., August 30, 1971 1. Excavate unsuitable foundation material beneath Digesters L & M and replace with compacted gravel fill at the direction of' the Engineer as specified and indicated in the proposal. · 1, 484 cu. yds •. @ $r. 50/cu. yd. (Contract Price) ADD $1_1, 130. 00 2. Added excavation and piping at drain valve manhole to conform to location of 12 11 drain line. Board· authorization date: '-"8eptember 8, 1971 LUMP SUM ADD 946.oo TOTAL ADD $12,076.00 Original Contract Price t 1 , 38 3~_QQ..Q_._Q!l_ Prev. l\uth. Ch0 nge s C • O • #1 $ (,6-23...Q.Q.) This Ch~nge (ADD)~1 ) $ 12,076.00 Amended Contract Price $ 1,394,453.00 Appro.ved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /sl Paul G. Brown Chi.ef F.ng:ine~r J.E.HOAGLAND & W.W. HOAGLAND JOHN CAROLLO· ENGINEERS .By --~~----------~----~--~-By __ ~--~----~----~--~-------- Agenda Item No. 8(e) -I-All Districts RESOLU~ION NO. 71-114 ORDERING VALUE OF ABANDONED OR REMOVED STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT REMOVED FROM BITOKS OF ACCOUNT - A JOINT-RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS· O~ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE VALUE OF CERTAIN ABANDONED OR REMOVED STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT REMOVED FROM THE DISTRICTS' BOOKS OF ACCOUNT The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,, 7, and 11, of Orange County California, RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, certain jo~ntly-owned capital improvements during the course of expansion of treatment and disposal facilities, are from time to time abandoned or demolished and are no longer required for the purposes of the Districts; and, WHEREAS, conformance to generally accepted accounting principals and procedures re~uire that assets disposed of be removed from the accounting records, -.NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AND ORDERED THAT: The certain jointly-owned structures and equipment set forth and summarized on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution, are hereby formally abandoned and the value thereof is hereby ordered removed from the Districts' Books of Account effective June 30, . 1971. Agenda Item No. 8(h) J-1 All Districts· Exhibit 11 A" COUN'rY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE. COUNTY ITEMIZATION AND DISTRIB{)TION OF VA.LUE OF JOINTLY OWNED STRUCTURES. A1'1D EQUIPMENT. _ABANDONED as of JUNE 30, 1971 STRUCTURES & EQUIPMENT ABANDONED Contract P2-l Beard Headworks Comnlex Effluent Sewer Pumping Station Structure Sewage and Sludge Pumps Grit Chamber Parshall Flume and Concrete Channel Utility Building Chlorinator Building Equipment Building Bar Screens and Grinders Drain Piping Sludge Pump & Water System added March, 1956 Emergency Overflow Channel Heating System Chlorinaton Equipment and Piping Air Blowers and Piping Water Supply System Standby Generator Lab Equipment Contract P2-8-l AB & C Sedimentation.Basin Pump & Meter Pits Contract P2-6-l Two Electrical .S"1aker fcreens Contract J-3B Engines and Filter Pump Enclosures DISTRIBUTION OF EQUITY TO DISTRICTS 1 2 3 .·5 6 7 11 $ 4, lJ.5.80 147,543.00 31,804.oo 35,256c:OO 5,037000 17,946.00 9,074000 10,786.00 l0,686039 660~00 3,263.95 1,436.03 13,142.00 15 .. 881.00 7,540.00 30,436.00 ·28,303.00 866.00 $373, 776 .. 17 20,590.00 16,ooo.oo fill~ll, 047. 23 $ J.t.2,420.07 128,328.95 134,700.18 23,758.53 24,292.89 27' 581. 27 29,965.34 $411,047.23 Agenda Item No. 8(h) J-2 Ail Districts . CABLE ADDRESS: OCEANS 1"EL.EX: 6l'i6 474 OCEANS LGB TELEPHONE <213 > 437·0481 OCEAN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, INC. tGOt WATER STREET LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90802 23 August 71 Mr. Fred Harper General Manager · . County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley 1 CA 92708 Dear Mr. Harper: Ocean Science and Engineering, Inc. (OSE) is pleased to submit for your consideration a proposal to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement. (EIS) for your planned 1971-72 treatment plants improvements. The OSE assigned project team will, in accordance with the proposed statement of work, provide · the EIS report to your 9ffice thirty (30) days after contractual go- ahead. ·be $6,000. schedule; The total fixed price for this proposed· effort will This sum will be payable to OSE per the following EIS Report Submittal EIS Report Final Approval $2,000 $4,000 ··lf there is a requirement for OSE technical support ; fopow ing the submittal and acceptance of the EIS report, our costs : wUl be at the rate of $35/hour plus actual expenses. l i , Please contact Mr. M. ·Robert Speach· of our staff : .on any questions regarding this proposal. · \ DFS/MRS/mdh Encl. ·K-1 Very truly yours 1 ~·{·s~~~~ . General ~anager - Western Region All Districts· . V \..J. .. PROPOSAL TO PREPARE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT . FOR THE 1971 72 TREATMENT PLANTS IMPROVEMENTS TO Mro Fred Ao Harper _General Manager COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY · .1084!~ Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 A~enda Item No~ 10 . ·K-2 All ·.Districts I . INTRooocrrION --The California Environmental Quality Act o.f _1970 requires that state governmental agencies at all levels develop s~andards and·procedures necessary to protect environ~ mental quality. Spe~ifically, state policy requires an environ- mental impact study be undertaken before:state 6r federal funds are allocated to any local agency. Furthermore the Resources \ Agency has developed and published on 21 June 1971 the "Proposed Guidelines fo~ the Preparation and Evaluation of Environmental Impact Statements Under the California Environmental .Quality Act of 1970." The Environment Impact section of the Pr~~ect Report Guideline prepared and published by the State Water Resources Control Board in July of 1971, follows the Resources Agency guidelines (section 9, Content of Environmental Statement) very .. closely. This proposal to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the 1971-72 Treatment Plants improvements will be implemented in accordance with the Environmental Impact ·Section of the .. Project Report Guidelines and the Resources Agency guidelines. STATEMENT OF WORK --The EIS fonnat specified in attachment "D" of the Project Re~ort Guidelipe pover seven (7) impact consid- erations: 1. Probable impact of the project on the environment -. 2. Probable adverse environmental e.ffects which _cannot be avoided Agenda Item No. 10 K-3 All· Dif;tricts ._) . 3. 4. 5. Mitigation measures proposed to minimi~e the Alternatives to the proposed action Short-tenn use versus long-term productivity t 6. Irreversible and Irretrievable commitments of resources 7. Objections to the project, if' any, and ~heir re~olution ·The Ocean Science and Engineering, Inc. (OSE) method for develoo- • ... . ing an EIS will meet the requirements and considerations set forth in the guide~ines in an orderly engineering approach. The following flow chart outlines the OSE methodology. . I Analysis of Degrade II . I -.. Identification Existing Environment , I .of I= Impact_ vs I Impact Areas ~ Proposed Modification~ ' EIS Enhance ..... .r Q ·= No Impact " : The identification of impact areas will be accomplished by assessing the elements of the propos~d project against a standard list of impact areas. The.application of the OSE form shown as F~gure 1 accomplishes this task in an orderly manner and docu- ments the results. ·~ith the specific impact ·areas for this project identified we .• can .commence· the ·nex·t taslc in our sequence, which consists of Agenda Item Noo 10 All Districts . ' -v- ... •. 0 .-No Impact :I ;.. Irnpa:ct· ·- .. · .. . ·Environmental Areas Earth -Soils Land Form Water -Surface 0 Underground Snow. Ice & Pcrmat'rost Atmosphere -Climate Appearanc.e Vegetation -Land rtant Life M3rine Plant t .. ife Animal Lire -nircJs Land Animals Fish" Bcnthic ~rganisms Land Use·-Natural {Wildcrnes:-1 Agricultural Industrial . Residential Recreational Water Use -Natural Commercial Recreational Human Con~umplion Aesthctici:; -Visual Odor Noise Others Agenda Item Noo 10 ........ () C1J ··~ .o tt .- K-5 . \. k" Remar. s .· ·OSE-ES-1 : ' All Districts I. ~ analyzing and assessing each identified impact area in terms of the ocean;· air, nciise and· aesthetiCs. Again the appli~.:i_~ion . . ·of an OSE form (figure 2) allows for an adequate measure of\ administrative control and documents the results. In implementing this task (analysis of impact on existing envir~ onment from proposed modifications) we will accomplish the! following subtasks: 1. Documentation of the existing ocean, air, noise, and aesthetic environment for the area of influence. The documentation will be in terms of the environmental characteristics itemized in figure 2. 2. De£ine the planned project ocean·, air, and noise dis- '..I charges, and aesthetic. modifications. 3. Conduct trade-.off analysis of the existing env.i:ronment vs the"projec~·modifications with respect to each i~­ p.act area identified in task 1 {earth, water, atmos- phere, vegetation, animal life, land use, water use, aesthetics). t. ~Prepare Environmental Impact Statement for the seven ·(7) impact considerations identified in t~e Project ·Report Guidelipe in terms of the results of the trade- ·Off analysis conducted in subtask 3. Due to the fact that the proposed improvement·project will be -a minor modification to existing well ftocumented (environment- A~enda Item No. 10 K-6 All Districts r r-r .....::.. Ocean 0 ~ I-.. <C u -=== LL ·-Q . ·E 0 c ---=--.. ENVIRONMENT. OCEAN -TEMP, I SALINITY •· CURRENTS TIDES . AIR -TEMP, LA.PSE RATE WIND VEL. WIND DIR. 'NO~$E -· EXISTING LEVELS TIME & DIRECTION .. AESTHErICS - EXISTING OPERATIONS ) . 4 -,l .. ENVIRONMEfff + ~~ODIFICATION = IMPACT Disch. Definition Air Disch. Definition Noise Disch~ : ~ ' '· .. I .. I ,, .. . .. .. -··--- ) ' :. Definition . Aesthetic Modification -. . . l , .. I ----------· .. )OSE-ES-2 m' .,L> C) •rl ti Ul ·rl ~,. rl . ~ o' rl . 0 ;z; --Q3 .p !-! I I : ! ' \ I I '..I this proposal will be accordingly small, and require little o·r no collection of field data. For this reason OSE pr6pose! to i~l~ent the work statement outlined herein over a perio! of . · 1 .30 days following contractual go-ahead. The .3d day schedule and associated fixed price ($6000) are based on the client (County I ·Sanitation Districts of Orange County) providing: 1 1. Ocean environmental data supporting the existing out- fall design 2.· The outfall design and operating characteristics 3. The outfall efflue~t discharge constituents and 4. present discharge patterns Present plant smoke and gas discharge constituents and discharge pattern data · ~resent plant noise producing systems noise level data 6. Any environmental complaint (government agencies or local inhabitants) they feel pertinent to this effort. QUALIFICATIONS AND STAFFING OSE has just completed two (2) environmenta.l impact studies for the Los Angeles office of the .Corps of Engineers. ·l. Environmental Study of Tijuana River Estuary -April 1971 2~ Environmental Study -Los Angeles-Long Beach Harbor July 1971 We have also been engaged in the prepara~ion of Corps of En- \._) . gi~eers/Environmental Pro.tection Agency waste disc::harge perr~d ts for seven (7) Southern California companies; and are currently Agenda Item No. 10 K-8 All Distr:Lcts under contract to.Kaiser-Gypsum.'to. condu~t monthly ~ampling~ . . . ~ ·testing and reporting of their plant discharges to the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board. Figur~ 3 is a list of environmental support contracts compieted over the past five (5) years for a variety of clients on a world-wide basis. OSE will assign M. Robert Speach the responsibility for direc- ing this proposed study. Mr. Speach will be specifically ass.isted by Dr. Marshall D. Earle, and ·o. E. Hasselman. Other members .of the OSE technical staff ~ay be used if required. I i 1· Agenda Item No. 10 K-9 All Districts ? •. ·., FIELD ENGINEERING 'J.' J.g UL. C v ; OSE EXPERt-ENCE -:==r··· -.... ·S.UM·MARY ·--===·..,... CJ) +.:> CJ ·rl ·.CUSTOMER . SHORT JOB DESCRIPTION ::... Di>: -. -~ --·~-t-.... :·· -·---+:> en __,.5cripps I. of Oc California Beach Survey for AEC x x x· x 3 20 .,-1 q -AEC rl rl ct: ;"' De Beers CDM.Beach Survey x x x 3 20 Raymond Intl~ Cape PJ;"eston Aust. Oceanographic Msmt. x x x x x ~ x 12 30 .. Raymond Intl. Cape Preston Wave Forces Model Study x x x 1 1 "AMAX Puerto Rico. Copper Mine Tailings Outfall x x x x x x x x 2 15 0 Pie kands-Ma the Tasmanian Hydrographic ·surve;; (Soros) x x x· x x x x x 7 10 rl ~ I ~ NOTS* ~FU-53 Ship Maintenance and Qperations .: x x x x 6 3 N60530-11765 Manuals { CO:J. E. Fletche U. !3. A. Corps o! Santa Monica Bay Sand Invento~y x x x l 1 Enginee1·s · Raymond Inst. Cape Preston Hurricane Hindcast x x 0 rl • 0 U. of Hawaii Seismic Shooting -OSS (Furomoto) I-:>" ,.:-.t .. ~ .. Beth.lehem Steel Manganese Nod~le Cruise I Cl) +:> H Scripps I. of Oc. Fallout Samples on OCEANEER Hawaii Trip x ---. ..:.. .. rn ---~~·. 'd ~ a> .. RMK-BRJ Vietnamese Harbor Survey x x x x x ·20 180 l..1 CJ'.; .... Gen. Dyn/Conv~ Rober_t Snyder Consul ting Services ) x x x ~ x .. ) 1 .... ,,, ·-.. . -. _, . FIELD .. 1-.·1gure ~ ENGINEERIN.G . "' . - O.S E EXPERIENCE es::=.= ... -------=-=·-: c=· ,...... . ·su~JlMARY. -= -.:.~ UJ ..µ CJ •rl CUS.TOMER I SHORT JOB DESCRIPTION H ~~--· .. ----..... ..-. .. .___...,..-= ... ,. . .__,_.. .......... ____ ..µ --.......... C/J ·rl NOTS* SEAL.AB III Site Survey x x x x x x x 3 13 A CN:N60530-67- r-1 r-1 C-0104. c:r: CO:E. Carp.enter OICC/C of E·· Vietnam Seismic Rock Search x x 3 6 . ·DuPont Design and SurveY: for OES DuPont .Preliminary Inve~tigations For Pelaware x x x x 2 12 River OutfaH Site r-1 r-1 Broward Co. Off shore Sand Survey x x x x x x x x 3 6 I v 1-1 Florida Westinghouse ~e.a Tes.ts Side-Looking Sonar x . • . I t ' : Bechtel .· Coring for Nuclear Power. Plant-Seal Beadh Sttc x x x 1 2 FL & P Biscayne Bay Sea ~emperatt;re •' x x x x 1 1 0 r-1 Morgantown Current Survey ... · Powell & Assoc. x x x x x 3 2 • 0 ~ - Ma·rine Science EAI-OSE Shelf Resources Stu.dy x x 10 -::: @ ..µ Coun. H -· ·- Mys tic Oceanog. Geol~gical Enginee.ring Services x x x 2 z :..::~~.~-... co 'O ~ . Q) City of ·Avalon · Avalon Bay Landing Site x x x x x x x x z 10 <! ... . } )·' ·-i -~------·-----·--"'-··--·· ·-·· ..... ., ___ ... -. . . . . .. , FIELD ENGINEERING. O.S E EXPERIENCE ------=.r- SUMMARY ~,.,., ~--~ CUSTOMER. 1 SHORT JOB DESCRIPTION ~ -=.........__..._..,, ---·--·-·:..:::·-=========~=~=-·!::.=...:· Bethlehem Steel B.ethlehem Steel Manganese Cruise Co •. . . Matachawan Nova-Scotia Survey . · Mining Co. · ... ~uesen, Rutledge. Guam Hydrographic Survey Wentworth & . . •. ,· Johnston USN-NFEC .UCEL . San FranciSco Piling Work . . . . .' . !-." •• ;. ; . Vibrati~g Anchor ~ Deep Mooring S~dy USA-·C of E San Juan·Survey .. ·. ... ")· . ' .. 1 I .· x x x x XXXX'X x x x ) x x x x .. ··. l?l:gure 3 .. .. C\J r-1 I . 1..,.1 . t-'-1 . 0 r-1 . 0 z ~ ('!) -!-) H --·------_ -_,... -.-:--~---~--~ ----- s:: Q) ) .. .. B I.D TAD UL AT I 0 N ---------- CONTHACT FOR: INTERPLANT INFLUENT INTERCEPTOR, JOB NO. I-8 co::~TRACTOR SCH.l~DULE I ~=-:-::·-===· ============== l. KORDICK AND RADOS, A JOINT VENTURE P. o. Box 279 Bald\"Jin Park,· California 91706 2. J. F. SHEA CO., INC. 655 Brea C~nyon Road Walnµt, Californi~ 91789 : 3~ SULLY MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY 3000 East South Street Lo.ng Beach, California 90805 : : li .. ·, 5. PERINI CORPORATION One Maritime Plaza San·Francisco, California 94111 KEMPER-DRUMMOND-BRONNECK, A J"oint Venture 1710 Santa Monica Blvd. , _ _.._s .... anta Monica. California 90404 : 6. VIDO ARTUKOVICH & SON, INC. 11155 Rush street . 'l ! • I 10. So~ El Monte, California MA'l'T J. ZAICH CONSTRUCTION-CO. 6822 Farmdale Avenue· North Hollywood, California *CORRECTED TOTALS ) 5,231,536.00 5', 395 '994. 00 5,401,475.00 • * 5 ? 5 29 ! 488 • 00 5.496,500.00 5,710,774.00 * 6,lOJ.,450.00 s·H E ET SCH.EDUI-E II 1,332,975.00 1'lt')1. 10'). 00 l ,847,000 .. 00 l,388.190.00 1,278~195.00. ·1,358,511.00 ) En15ineers' s Est.$"[, 505, 1199. DATEAugust 24,1971,11:00 a.m. DEDUCT FOR ONE CONTRACT 177 ,000·. 00 . 203,500.00 110.000.00 549.000.00 55,000.00 -o- -o-. NET BID $6,387,511.00 6,721.~94,oo 6.742.580.00 *6,827.488.00 .. . . 6,829.690.00 6,988,969.00 *7,459,961.00 ) I H I . 0 z s (J) ..p H cd "d ~ Q) RESOLUTION NO. 71-115 A.MEI~ING RESOLUTION NOo 71-80, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NO. I-8 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS. OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOSo l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, . CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NOo 71-80, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NO. I-8 . * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of directors of Colinty Sanitation Districts Noa. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California DO EEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Section 5.of Resolution No. 71-80, approving plans and specifications for Job No •. I-8, is hereby amended to read as follows: 11 Section 5. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized to award contract for said Job No. I-8~ Interplant Influent Interceptor, on behalf of these Boards of Directors, upon receipt of recommendation of the General Counsel." PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1971. Agenda Item No. 13 -M-All Districts vVUill. .!. C>.t-\!'4.L.U·iJ. .LVI~ LJl..::>J..:\..Lvl. .::> vr VL\.ML'tU;:. vVUi'(.1. J. P. o. BOX 8127 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CaliforQia 92708 CHANGE ORDER . C .O. NO. 1 ----------- CONTRACTOR:MERCO CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERS, INC. DATE: September 8, 1971 JOB: BEACH RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, REACHES 17, 18, & .19, ·coNTRACT NO. . 3-16 Amount of this change order (ADD) (~) $ 1,148.23 \w;1 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. · REFERENCE: Contractor's letter to District dated July 28, 1971• Due to the discovery of an 8" oil line and a 2" oil line at the center of the jacking pit at Station 42+24 to 42+44, the Contractor was directed to move his operation to the.east approxi- mately 10 feet and to tunnel under these lines. Tunneling is required due to proximity of these lines to the edge of the pit. All work involved including the delay caused by the work on the first boring pit is to be done for the quoted price of $1,148.23. \._/ . Board authorization date:· "~ptember 8, 1971 \.._.; ·Agenda Item No. 26 LUMP. SUM ADD Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD)(DEDUCT) $1,148.23 $ 453, 122.15 $ -o----- $ ___ 1_;;.., _14_8_. _23_ Amended Contract Price $ __ 4_5_4 ,_2_70_._38_ -N- Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer MERCO CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERS By------------------~------------ District No.· 3 • i3HUIRMAN • SIMflSON ~m..·~-::a L:::"1 r---~ ~,..·~ 1· ·~~ l ·~· .~ L ... .,->:f 1!?!:3 ~j:_.~ CONSUL TINO CIVIL ENOINEEAS County Sanitation District No. 5 ·10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Attenti"on: Mr. Paul Brown Gentlemen: September 1, 1971 We have reviewed the District's request to update the estimated cost of the facilities required to serve the portion of the Coastal Slope area easterly of the present pistrict bGundary that might be annexed in the future. The Irvine Company is currently updating land use plans, population densities, and. utility systems for the entire area. The results of these studies will be available in .about 45 days. Any updating of our previous master plan would be meaningless if it did not reflect the latest land use plans of The Irvine Company. It is therefore recommended ·that our study be delayed until the new information is available from The :Crvine Company. · Our. fee for the work would ·be based on the following· hourly rate schedule: Principal ------------------------$30.00 per hour ·Engineers --------~-------$18.00-$22.00 per hour Designers and Draftsmen --$13.00-$17.50 per hour Typist---------------------------$ 8.75 per hour The maximum fee on the above pasis would be $1500.· Our study w.ill be completed within 30 days after the required information is available from The Irvine Company. Thank you for the opportunity of submitting this proposal. Very truly yours, ~ · DCS:c NEWPORT CENTER BUILOINO 359 Sen Miguel Drive Newport. Beach, Californ1u 92660 (714) 644·0563 Ag~nda Item No. 30 -0-District No. 5. RESOLUTION NO. 71-116-11 ANNEXATION NO. 15 -SIGNAL BOLSA #1 ANNEXATION A 'RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF PIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 15 -SIGNAL BOLSA #1 ANNEXATION) * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California, . DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: That an application for annexation of territory to itself be made to the Local Agency Formation Commission as fo1lows: Section 1. That this proposal is made pursuant to Division 1. {District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 qf the Government Code of the State of California; and, Section 2. That this application is for the purpose of adjusting the District's boundary by annexing 348.36 acres of real property to provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory, as requested by the majority property owner; and Section 3. That the territory to be annexed is uninhabited; and, Section 4. That the designation assigned said annexation is "Signal Balsa #1 Annexation -Annexation No. 15", the boundaries of which are more particularly described and delineated on Exhibit "A" and Exhibit 11 B11 , attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 5. That provisions for fees required to be paid as a condition of the annexation must·be satisfied prior to com- pletion of annexation proceedings; and, Section 6. That request is hereby made that such proceedings : as required by. law be taken to complete this annexation. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1971. Agenda Item No. 37 P-1 District No. 11 I~ SCALe-\ •b t ooo • 0 z C~iY OF HU~ilN6\0N fOL8AC~-:1~-..-----1-£ <E TALei;:t<:r A\J~ C\J --I . . ~ I I . • ( 5ANl1A1lON I Lf6e=-ND I --t")(,1Si\N6 CIT'( e6UNO!Z.Y ~ _ __ --r,:Jr,.?~P.1"1~r'i f'l"'TV ~t') l~r"eV Ol51RtC\ NC2~ RESOLUTION NO. 71-117-7 · . . APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO, 7-6-4 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF· COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR REDHILL INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 6, 7, & 8 . * * * * * *· * * The Board of Directors of County· Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOE~ HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section l·. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering~ District's.engineers, for construction of Redhill Interceptor, Reaches 6, 7, and 8, Contract No. 7-6-4,· ar~ hereby approved and adopt~d; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the .Health and Safety Code of the State of· California; and, ·,Section 3. That said bids will be received until. 11:00 a.m., ·October 19, 1971, at which time ~h~y will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts 1 Engineers be authorized to· ope_n said bids on behalf of these Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1971~ · Agenda Item No. 41 -Q-District No. 7 COUNTY S.!\HI'l'J~TICH DISTRICTS OF-. OHAHGr.; COUNTY P. o. BOX 8127 -10(~44 Ellis A venue Fountain Valley, Califorpia 92708 CHANGE ORDER . C.O. NO. 3 --------- CONTPJ\CTOR: ERNEST E. PESTANA, INC. DATE: September 8, 1971 JOB: SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR, REACH 2, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-2 Amount of this change orde! (ADD) ·(~) $' ·2,142.00 i...._; In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ·. REFERENCES: District letter to Boyle Engineering dated March 11, 1971. Boyle Engineering letter to District dated May 18, 1971·. Contractor's letter to District dated July 16', 1971. The contractor was directed to construct 90 ft. of 15 11 VCP sewer from the manhcle at station 151+85 to the end of the existing 15 11 VCP sewer recently constructed in Plaza Drive. LUMP SUM ADD Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change {ADD)(~') Amended Contract Price Board authorization date: Approved: $ 2,142.00 $ -o------- $ 2,142.00 $ 1,280,380.00 ~eptember 8, ~971 COUNTY SAUITATION DISTRICTS of orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chtef Engineer ERNEST E. PESTANA, INC. B Agenda Item No. 42 -R-District No. 7 Meeting Date ------- DISTRICT 1 Gris et ·Miller :i;>orter. Battin DISTRICT 2 -==== Herrin Coco -i th . ,,/. Hileman "er{ristie ~ Root Clark Jackson ·culver . ·Finnell Gomez Herrin r Griset Just . Harper Slins Zuniga Stephenson Dutton Wedaa Z Macha.do Winn ~ Schnlepp Battin 4,L. ·DISTRICT 3~ Hyde- Berton Christie ~ Clark Culver : !ffe: Davis Green ~/ Harper ....:~ Harvey ......k:.-. Herrin ~17 Hemeon :JZ" Kroes en Westra Ro9t · Jackson Fonte McCracl~en Just Kan el Griset Lewis Hoga rd 1. __ fl.den :=i? m'CWhinney ~/ Sims .LL~ Zuniga Stephenson :.Z, Dutton Battin Z DISTRICT·5 Pars. oris · ~ Hirth Croul Battin _ DISTRICT Porter Mcinnis Battin DISTF.ICT Mili'e1r Gris et Porter Rogers Smith Battin .~DISTRICT ~ipley Coen. Battin·· Hirth Coco Herrin H;irth Hileman McCracken Goldberg Time Distrj.cts _______ .._ --· * * Mitchell Boyd -~Goldberg - OTHERS Harper ~ Brm·m __k::::. Sylvester-tL- Lewis L/ Dunn ~- Clarke ~ Stgler - Crabb d.. . ~. \c.nd-C,1""1/ 7 Carlsoh t Finster Lvl'her W'OrJ~ Galloway "' 0 \i ~ Hohener ,_.,.,.. V\ "bV\e.. '-'"'lee..~ Hunt ..fl -\ l V Keith \]Y\Jc.e.. \~'i ov----Lowry "(" Maddox Wn'\< ~vans_ . Mc:irtinson- . · Niss on M · · \ \ D . Piersall -l ')O. r ~(\~le \eC1~ ----Stevens · COMMISSION BERT BOND. PRCSIDENT HELEN COBB. VICE-PRESIDENT THOMASLLAUBACHER LINDSLEY PARSONS L. E. TIMBERLAKE PROJECT MANAGER GEORGE E. HLAVKA. PH.D. CONSUL TING BOARD PROI'. JOHN 0. ISAACS. CHAIRMAN RICHARD K. C. LEE. M.D. l!RMAN A. PEARSON. PH.D. DONALD W. PRITCHARD, PH.D. JOHN H. RYTHER, PH.D. Agenda Item No.· I h fa) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT 1100 GLENOON AVENUE LOS ANGEL.ES, CAL.IFORNIA 90024 • (213) 478-0606 ANNOUNCEMENT A short course in fish diseases and pathology ·is being offered October 18 through 22 (Monday -Friday) at the Center for Continuing Education, University of California at Davis. The cburse will be given by Dr. William Klontz, Department of Veterinary Microbiology, School of. Veterinaxy Science, Texas A & M University. Topics include holding and handling fishes, diagnoses, ~ab work and demonstrations. Registration will cost approximately $100.00 and room and board will be additional. Enrollment is limited to 25 on first come first serve basis. I have attempted to hold two places in the class. For futher details contact me or: Dr. Al Edward College of Veterinary Medicine University of California, Davis Phone:. (916) 752-1011 Alan J. Mearns, Ph.D • . Sr. Environmental Specialist a.c~, ... , .. // P}e..&~·l,/"~/J_. AJM:es L .. George E. Hlavka Irwin Haydock Margie Sherwood Chris Lindstrom Ted Dunn Doug Hotchkiss Jay Stock John Vaughn COMMISSION BERT BONO. r111cs1DtNT HELEN coee. v1cc.,.1tcs101tNT THOMAS E. LAUBACHER llNDSLEY PARSONS L. E. TIMBERLAKE PROJECT MANAGER GEORGE£. HLAVKA. PH.D. CONSULTING BOARD PflO'. JOHN D. ISAACS. CHAIRMAN RICHARD K. C. I.EE. M.D. !AMAN A PEARSON. PH.D. DONALD W. PRITCHARD. PH.D. JOHN H. RYTHER. PH.D. Agenda Item No.· I h fa) ·SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCl-1 PROJECT 1'00 GL.ENOON AVENUE L.OS ANGELES, CAL.IFORNIA 90024 • (213) 478·0609 ANNOUNCEMENT A short course in fish diseases and pathology is being offered October 18 through 22 (Monday -Friday) at the Center for Continuing Education, University of California at Davis. The cburse will be given by Dr. William Klontz·, Department of Veterinary Microbiology, School of. Veterinary Science, Texas A & M University. Topics include holding and handling fishes, diagnoses, ~ab· work and demonstrations. Registration will cost approximately $100.00 and room and board will be additional. Enrollment is limited to 25 on first come first serve basis• I have attempted.to hold two places in the class. For futher details contact me or: Dr. Al Edward College of Veterinary Medicine University of California, Davis Phone:. (916) 752-1011 Alan J. Mearns, Ph.D • . Sr. Environmental Specialist a.(~~,·. I· // J/J e6".lo/'fl4_ AJM:es . l · George E. Hlavka Irwin Haydock Margie Sherwood Chris Lindstrom Ted Dunn Doug Hotchkiss Jay Stock John Vaughn 1. I II MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts Po st Offic~ Box 8127 10844 Ellis A venue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: of Orange County , California REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, September 8, 19 71 '7:30 p.m. Area Code 714 540-2910 962-24 11 Se p t emb e r 2, 1 9 71 The following is a brief explanation o f the more i mportant non- r outine items wh i ch appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not o therwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are not attac h ed to the agenda since they are made up immediately precedj_ng the meeting but wi l l appear in the complete a genda available at the meeting . * * * * * * * * * * * * J oint Boards No . 8 -CONSENT CALENDAR I TEMS: The followi ng agenda i tems fa ll into this category in accordance with the definition established by the Bo a rds: (a ) (b) Approval of P_;Lans and S:eecifications for Job No. Pl-3-1 - This pro·j ect, known as Odor Control and Improved Influent Screening Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1 , has a high priority in our scheduling of 1971-72 projects, principally because of severe deterioration of our influent bar screens at Plant No . 1, which were installed in 1958. Under this job, the contractor will replace the screens, construct a bypass channe l , screening walls for odor control and esthetlc improvement, and upgrade our existing pre - chlorination facilities for odor control. Our design engineers have completed plans and specifications and we are recomm ending that t he job be authorized for bids to be received on October 5. The estimate for this projec t is $115,000. 'rhe project is eligible for a grant of 80 % of total cost from the State and Federal governments after our final application is approved. Addendwn No. 2 to Plant Job No. I-8 -Bids for this project, the Interpla.nt Influent Interceptor, were received on August 24-(see Item No. 11). During the latter part of the biddj_ng period our engineers n~commended the issuance of Addendum No. 2, which makes certain technical changes in the specifications (see copy of addendum included in agenda material). (e) Addendum No. 1 to Plant Job No. P2-ll-l -Headworks '.'c 11 Expansion at Plant No. 2 bids were received on September 1 (see bid tabula tion includ ed in the a g enda material) and it i s planne d that Dis trict No~ 1 wi ll award a contract for this project later in the month . The addendum, a copy of which is included in the agenda materi a l, i s strict l y t ec hnic a l in n ature to clarify quest ions r a ised by contractors and s uppli ers during the bidding period. Purchase of Radio ~ommunication System -For several years we have budgeted funds for p u rchase of a base b roadc as t station and mobile radio .equipment . However, becau se of the unavailability of tran smis sion equipment which could produce a satisfactory sig nal in outlying areas of the District, we have relied on commercial radiotelephone s ervic e which oft en has been very unsatisfact ory during emergencies. Recent developments in the technol ogy of ultra-high frequency transmission equipment now makes it pos s.i ble to have a much more economical and satisfactory connnunication system. Therefore, the staff has s olici ted bids for purchase and ins tallation of a base station to be located in the Control Center and ten mobile t wo -way units to be installed in the Districts' ma intenanc e vehic l es. Bids were opened on August 30 and it is recommended that the award be made to Motor o la. C & E, Inc., at the total price of $1'7, 563 . 35. The bidding spec ifications provide that the Districts have the option of purchasing five additional mobile units within 120 days at the same unit price originally b i d. A bid tabulation for this project is included in the agenda material, as is a memorandum on this subject and recommendation for award from our Maintenance Superintendent. It is anticipated that acquisition o f this equipment will result in considerable savings to the Districts through elirnination of the existing radiotelephone costs and increased efficiency of communication since more vehicles will be provided with radio communication equipme nt and will be able to coITu--nuni- c ate with each other directly as well as with t he Co ntrol Center. Ch ange Order No. 2 to Pl ant Job No. P2-19--This contrac t for two new sedimentation basins a..'1d digesters at Pl ant No. 2 is well under way. During excavation for the digester foundations, the e n gineers deemed ma terial discovered to b e unsuitable for support of the structures and 1 ,484 cubic yards of material not orig inally anticipated t o be exca- vat ed were ordered removed and r eplaced with compacted gravel. The contract provides for a f i x ed price of $7 .50 for such unanticipated work. Accordi ng l y, the sum of $11 ,130 must be added to the contract for this additional excavation and gravel replacement. The formal change order, included with the agenda material, a l s o include s an extra -item for $946 for additional excavation and piping at a drain valve manhole. (f ) (g ) (h) Emer genc y _Pu rchase for Repair of Sewag e Pump at Pla nt No . 1 - Th e large No . l PUriip at the r ecirculation pump station fo r our secondary treatme nt faciliti e s at Plant No. 1 r e c e ntly showed evidence o f f a iling . It was t aken out o f service, di smant l ed, and the movin g p a rts found to be badly deterio- rat ed . The p um p was orig inally f urnished by John s t on Pump Company of Pasadena; a ccordingly, the pump was shipped to the Comp any 's plant and a quotat ion for r epair was r equested. Upon receipt of the quotation, whi ch exceeded our staff purc hasing authority o f $2 000, Ch a irman Just was c onsulte d and be c ause of the emergency c reate d by t he l ack o f the p ump , verbally authorized the staff, as provided in our purchas i ng resolution, to issue imme di a t ely a p urc hase order f or the ne ce ssary repair in the amount of $3100 , p lus tax and fre i ght. This price includes providing a s t a i nless steel impe ller in lieu of the original bronze and it is believed that tlle repaired pump will h ave a d efinitely longer s e rvice life t han the origin al instal- l at:i,on. Att endance at National Mee ting of Wate r Poll uti o n Control Federation in San F'rancisco -In the ye a rs past, it has be en customary to authorize one or two employees to a ttend the Annual Meet in·g of this organization . whic h rep r esents a l l aspe c ts of the waste treatment and water p o llution control fie l ds in this count r y and several forei g n countries. Generall y, the Annual Mee tings are held on the east coast or in t h e midwest . Fortunate ly, thi s year the Conference will be held in San Francisco. I b e lieve it is extremely important to the Districts to have as many of our department heads and top supervisors at t end some of the sessions and more particular ly visit the Waste Water Eq uipme nt Man u fac turer s ' exhibits whi ch di sp l ay the latest water pollution control equipment a nd processes avai l ab le today. Although the Conference 1asts an entire week, I do not believe it would be n ecessary for a n y employee to be gone longer than three days as the sessions are structured t o c oncen trate on particular areas of interest on certain days. Therefore, we can schedule times and lengths of attendance to minimize the reduct ion of our work force . I am recommending that I be authoriz ed to d esignate ten employees to attend the Conferenc e during the wee k of October 3, not to exceed three working days for any employee so designated. Aut horization to Write -O ff ·Fixed Plant Assets -Dur i n g the course· o f expans ion o f our 'l'reatment Plants cert a in old e r facilities are from time to time abandoned or demolished . The res olution, included in the agen da ma t erial , autho- ri zes the removal of the v a l ue of these faciliti es from our fixed assets books. The r~so lution list the asset s involved. •• No . 1 0 -PROPOSAL FOR PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STA Tm.mNT : Th e n ew State regulations for processing grant app l ications for treatment works re quire that a detailed project repo r t be fi l ed prior to December 1 for our 1971 -72 projects f oi~ which Federal a nd State grants will be r equested. The California . Environmental Qu~lity Ac t o f 1970 requires that all gove rnmental agenci es unde rtake an environ- mental imp a ct study and submi.t a report thereon before State or Fede ral funds are a llocated . In the case of grants administe red by the State Wa ter Resources Control Board this Environmental Impact Statement mu st be included in the p roject report and must cover the subject in c onsi - der a ble depth. The State has made it clear that this Envi ronmental Impact Statement is s ubject to the review and approval of several State agencies. John Ca rollo Engine ers are preparing the eng ine ering portion of t he project rep ort but t h e y r ecomm e n d that the se rvices of an outside f i rm experienced 1·li th this type of report should be retained to prepare the Environmental Impact Statement. The staff has had s eve ral interviews ·wi tr~ Ocean Science a.rid Engineering of Long Beach, a firm with consj.derab l e expe rience in the envj _ronmental field and has asked for a p r oposa l for an Environmental Impact Statement and Report for our 1971-72 Plant imp rovement p roj ects (see proposal included in the agenda mate rial). We r ecommend that they be retained in a ccordance with their' prop osal o f Aug us't 2 3. It will be noted that the fixed fee of $6000 i s payabl e in t wo increme nts , $2000 on s ubmittal of repor t and the b a lance upon final app roval by the Dis tricts. Nos. 11 and 12 -REPORT CONC ERN ING LITIGAT I ON ON ROUTING OF JOB NO. I-8 : The Ge n e:r-a l Counsel was authoriz e-d , at the J u1y Joint Boara meeting, to take app1 opriate legal steps to establish the route of the Interp l a.nt Influent Interceptor a long Brookhurst Ave nue in Hun tington Be ach. Th e Dl st~icts ' recent Court acti on in this r egard was successful. The Ge nera l Counsel will report on this matter in more d etai l at the me eting . During the course of the Gen eral Coun.sel 1 s prepa~ation of the Districts 1 ap plic a t ~Lon for a Wr it o f Mandate in this matter~ I suggested that he may desi r e a~sis tanc e bec a u se of the unique circ um - stance s o f the cas e and the importance of the outcome to the Districts. Following my suggestion, he d:Ld ask Clark Miller, Attorney-at-Law> to sit in and r evi e w the matter of ov:c aDD lication for a Writ of Mandate . Age nda I t em No . 1 2 authori?.es that Clar k Miller be employed to act as co-couns elor ·with C, Arthur Ni sson, General Co u nsel, in the mat ter of County Sanitation Districts v. Cit y of Hunting ton Beac h, in r egard to J. o b No . I-8 . No. 13 -AUTHORIZING AWARD OF JOB NO ... J-·8: As ment ione d previous l y, b:Lds for this con tract, the second l a r ge st ever to be awarded by the Di stricts, were ope11cd on Aug ust 24 with e xcellent bidding competi tion and the low bid $1. J. mil l ion under the enginee r's estimate. The s ucc essful bidde r i s a joint venture of two we ll qualified f i rms i n this field who h a.vc h ad other contrac.ts with the Dis trict s i n -t he past . We believe the y will construct the p-coject with a minimum of me s s and confusion and will cooperate fu11y with the loca.l merchants and r esidents a l cng the route to minimize traffic problems and in- con veniences . Since the ma tter of the routing of thi s proj e ct is tied in with the litigat ion described in the p r evi ou s item, we are re c ommending that District No. 1 be author ized to a ward the cont r act t o the low bid d er , Kordick and Rados, afte r receipt of a favorab l e rec ommendation from the General Counse l. District No. 1 No. 1 8 -AUTHORIZING PAYMENT FOR RELOCATION OF WATER LINES ( COtrl'RACT NO. 1-12): The recently awarded contract for the Main-Dyer Intercept or r equires the District to provide for the relocation of City of Santa Ana water mains in two separate locations along the route. The City has quoted a maxj_mum cost of $5200 to do the required relocations with Water Department forces and we recommend that a purchase order i n an a.mount not to exceed $5200 be issued to accomplish the required work. No. 21 -CONSIDERATION OF' MOTION TO ADJOURN TO LATER IN MON'11H: The sta f f recommends that the Dire ctors adjourn to a mutually agreeable dat e, after September 21 for consideration of award of the following Pl ant contracts: ( 1) I-~, Interplant Influent Interceptor (Item No . 11), (2) P2-ll-l, Headworks 11 c 11 Expansion at Plant No . 2 (Item No . 8(c)), (3) J-7-2, Administration-Engineering Building Addition, and (4) J-12, Vehicle Ma intenance Faci l ities . District No. 3 • No. 26 -CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, CONTRACT NO. 3-16: we· recommend the adoption of a change order in the a.mount of $1,148 .23 for addi ti onal work required by the clisco.very of unknmm oil lines in the working area of' two jacking pits. 1rhis contract is for the Beach Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 17, 18, and 19, in the Buena Park area . Further details on the requJred extra work will be found on the formal change order included with the age nda material . District No. 5 No. 30 -ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR UPDATING COST INFOR.Ml1.TION F'OR SEWERAGE FACILITIES: The Directors will recall that Shuj_rman-Simpson was directed at the July 27 adjourned Board meeting to prepare a r eport updating to 1971 levels cost extimates for sewerage facilities required to serve the ult:i.mate needs of the Dist r·ict. Since the District does not have a current agreement with this firm for per- formance of this type of service, the staff h as requested the eng ineers to submit a proposal for this work. This proposal, dated September 1 , is included in the agenda material and we rec omme nd that it be accepted and the engineers author·ized to proceed with the work outlined for a total amount not to exceed $1500. District No. 11 No . 37 -INITIATION OF· ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS, ANNEXATION NO. 1 5: At the August 1 1 Board meeting a petition from Signal Properties, Inc., to annex 348.36 acres to the District was receiv e d and filed and referred to the staff. The petition appears to be in order and we recommend adoption of the resolution included with the agenda material initiating formal annexation p roceedin g s for this parcel. District No. 7 No . 41 -APPR OVAL OF PLANS AND SP ECIF ICAT IO NS, CON TRA CT NO. 7 -6 -4 : The next construct i on pro ject j_n t h e District 's bond i ssue work is a portion of the Red Hi l l Interceptor to carry it from McGaw and Red Hill Av enues, the terminus of Cont r act No . 7 -6 -3 (to be awarde d Sept ember 30) t o a point 1320 feet south of Valenc i a Avenue where j_ t will connect t o the recently completed Red Hill Re l ief Trunlc Pi pe size wil l begin at 45-inch diameter in the lower reaches and be 33-inch at the upper end. The total length of the projec t is approxi - ma t e ly 7,973 feets with an estimated construct i on cost of $578 ,ooo. Bids wi ll be opened on October 19, with awaJ~d scheduled on October 26 . Completion of this pro,ject will afford pe1·manent relief for existing o verloaded facilities in the sout h part of the Distric t. No . 42 -CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO CONTRACT NO. 7 -6 -2 : This recommend e d chang e order, adding $2,142 to the c ontrac t price for the Sunfl ower Int erc eptor, Reach 2, was negotiated by the staff with the con tractor t o c onnect the interceptor with the existing recently constructed Pl aza Drive Sewer. Adding this work to the contract 'Hill avoid hi ghe r cost and future traffic disruptions if the street is torn up l ater for this connection after t h e interceptor is.in service. No . 4 3 -PETITION :B~OR ANNEXATION OF TE NTATIVE TH.ACT NO, 7389: A r equest for annexation of 10.201 acres (Tract No. 7389) was deferred from the .1\.ugust 1 1 meeting to Septembet 8. On August 2Lt-, the Petitj_on f or Annexation was amended to include an adclit:Lonal 27.003 acres, making the total acreage involved 37.204 ac:rcs. At the present time, the staff is still investigating the effect on the existing sewer system of the incre ased flows to be generated b;>r the County zoning densities approved i'or these properties. No. l.t-7 -CONSIDEIV\TION OF MOTION TO ADJOURN TO SEPTEMBER 30: As mentioned under Item No. La, awa:rd of Contract No. 7-6-3, Sunflower Interc eptor, Reach 3 and Hed Hill Interceptor, Reaches 4 and 5, is scheduled to be awarded on September 30 a1t an adjourned meeting. Accordingly it will be necessary for the Board to adjourn to this date, which is the tentative re-scheduled meeting date of the Exec ut ive Committee, in order to award this contract, or to another mu tually agreeable date, after receipt of bids on September 21 . Fred A. Harper Gene r a l Manager