The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1971-07-28 !! BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Lalif., 92708 DISTRICT No. Z IIAGENDA ADJOURNMENTS........Y..... July 28 1971 - 5: 30 P.M. cok,,p P. MILEAGE.,...✓".. FILES SET lll' ....... ':..., RESOLU-iIGi:S GER6HED,� LETTERS WRITTEN......!!�r MINUTES v�RITTEN... 1) Roll Call MINUTES FILED......1, . (2) Appointment of Chairman pro tem, if necessary (3) Report of the General Manager's (4) Report of the General Counsel (5) Discussion with representatives of the Chino Basin \� Municinal Water District and the Orange County Water District concerning their participation in the co structign of �/he anta Ana R'ver Ipterc�j�ptQ sewer t6 c�. n (6) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from the Orange County Water District, dated July 9, 1971, offering to participate in a feasibility study for an upstream water reclamation plant within District No. 2. See pagQ "All (7) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal submitted- by Lowry and Associates, dated July 23, 1971, re conducting a study to select an appropriate site for a water reclamation plant in District No. 2, for a lump sum fee of $10,00 . See page ItBII -c 1� r ,._ v,j -4. !*►U AA (8) Other business and communications (a) Discussions of 1971-72 fiscal year budgets (9) Consideration of motion to adjourn 5AWeA -00 V.) WIlr Cy V a� •� r.-� !L w _, -,�/�6�`tP� �lM—CIF-v.(' �o�eYXCi iW.01 o�ORVArQ ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 1629 WEST SEVENTEENTH STREET • TELEPHONE (714) 547.6781 office of SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706 Sacrefaq Manager July 9, 1971 Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. O. Box• 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. Harper: This will confirm our District' s participation in a feasibility study and report for a sewage treatment / waste water reclamation facility in the Atwood area. It is our understanding that the total cost for the study and report would not exceed $10 ,000 . Our District would pay 50 per cent of the cost, or a maximum for our participation of $5 , 000 . This reconnaissance-type study should be done in enough detail so that it could be used for a pre- certification report for Federal or State participation in the construction costs . All technical aspects of the study and report should be coordinated with G. M. Wesner , our Assistant District Engineer. V y truly yours, V Langdon W. wen Secretary anager Agenda item 1#6 District No. 2 LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES CIVIL ENGINEERS SIDNEY L_ LOWRY ASSOCIATES ' PRESIDENT 121 EAST WASHINGTON AVENUE BANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 02701 HARRY C. BILLINGS, VICE PRES. Telephone DONALD J.MARTINSON. VICE PRES. SIIS301 Area Code 714 July 23, 1971 Mr. Fred Harper County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Dear Mr. Harper: , This is in response to your request to submit a proposal for a water reclamation study in Orange County Sanitation No. 2. The purpose of the study would be to select an appropriate site for a water reclamation plant in cooperation with the Orange County Water District and to deter- mine the quality and quantity of the tributary flow to the plant. A flow diagram delineating the necessary plant components would also be prepared. All information that is needed for the preparation of a pre-certification report as required by the state's grant program would be developed. The scope of the study would include the following: 1. In cooperation with the District staff, select appropriate locations in the trunk sewer system to take flow quantity measurements and water quality analyses. The field data will- be combined with past records and placed in computer storage. This information will be placed in a computer program whereby the data can be quickly used for future flow projections on a computer model basis. 2. In cooperation with the Orange County Water District and the District staff, select an appropriate site for a water reclamation facility. 3. Determine the quantity and quality of the tributary flow to the selected water reclamation plant site*, utilizing the quantity measurement, water quality analyses, and previous studies. 4. Predict the future flows and water quality to the plant site, taking into consideration the potential improvement in water quality due to the State Water Project. Agenda, Itein T'7 B--1 District 2 July 23, 1971 Mr. Fred Harper County Sanitation Districts • of Orange County, California Page -2- 5. Develop a flow diagram showing the plant components that would be needed to meet the probable waste discharge requirements that would be established by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. 6. Prepare a report on the findings of the study. It is proposed that this study be conducted for a lump sum fee of $10,000. Laboratory work in regard to water quality analyses would be conducted by the District in the District laboratory facilities. It is estimated that it will take 90 days to complete this study. Very truly yours, Lowry and Associates Donald J. rartinson DJM/jh Agenda Item 71/7 B-2 District 2 MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 517510844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 DISTRICT NO. 962-2411 5 :30 p.m. , July 28, 1971 An update report on discussions with staff personnel of the State Water Resources Control Board, the Chino Basin Municipal Water District and the Orange County Water District was mailed to the Directors on July 20th. This report described the interest of these entities in the Santa Ana River Inter- ceptor project and we have been advised that representatives of the two water districts will be present at Wednesday' s meeting to plan a course of action. The District ' s consulting engineer has been directed to review the current flow measurements in our major sewer lines to determine how much longer we can delay before the District must begin construction of facilities to supplement the exist- ing sewer system. Included with the agenda material is a letter from the Orange County Water District indicating its willingness to participate with our District in a feasibility study and report for a sewage treatment/water reclamation facility in the Atwood area. The study would entail the accumulation of information concerning the quantity and quality of wastewater available for reclamation, the feasibility of the project, and possible plant sites . It is our recommendation that the Board authorize Lowry and Associates to conduct this study for a fee of $10,000 in accordance with the proposal included with the agenda material. The costs are to be shared equally with the Orange County Water District. Fred A. Harper General Manager �./ FAH- j Meeting Date 7 Time Districts DISTRICT 1 _ JOINT BOARDS "--= Just Harper Griset Herrin Berton Westra Miller Coco Christie Root Porter Clark Jackson Battin Coen Culver DISTRICT 2 Davis Fonte Finnell Gomez iith ✓ Hileman Green icCrackei 'Uwfzristie -.a- _ Root Griset Herrin Clark G Jackson Harper Just Culver Harvey . Kanel Finr_ell Gomez Hemeon Lewis Herrin f Griset Herrin. Griset Just Harper Hirth Croul Suns Zuniga Holden Hogard Stephenson ✓ Dutton Hyde Kroesen Wedaa y Machado McInnis Hirth Winn ✓ Schniepp McWhinney Battin Miller Coco Parsons DISTRICT 3 r� Porter Rogers Hirth Hyde Kroesen Shipley lMcCracker Berton Westra Christie hoot Sims Zuniga Clark Jackson Smith Hilemanp Culver Ste henson button � Davis Fonte Wedaa Kachado Green i,icCracken Winn Schniepp Haroer Just Battin Harvey Kanel Herrin Griset Hemeon Lewis Mitchell Aden Hogard Boyd Goldberg cWhinney Sims _ Zuniga OTHERS Stephenson , Dutton Battin Harper DISTRICT 5 BroVm Parsons Sylvester Hirth Croul Lewis Battin ,+_ Dunn Clarke DISTRICT 6 Sigler Porter Cra�b/ 1-IcInnis Hirth �rr Battin Carlson Finster DIS T_ Galloway i-filler Coco Hohener Griset Herrin Hunt Porter Keith Rogers Hrth Lowry Smith Hileman Maddox Battin Martinson Nisson DISTRICT 1_1 Piersall iipley 141cCracken Stevens Coen Battin. - DISTRICT Goldberg iitchell Lattin CHINO BASIN July 28, 1971 MUNICIPAL ` ItI A T E R DISTRICT Board of Directors J. AND'REW SCHLANGE Orange County Sanitation District GENERAL MANAGER 10844 Ellis Street TELEPHONE (714) 987-1712 --- Fountain Valley, California Gentlemen: Re : Santa Ana River Outfall On July 283, 1971, the Board of Directors of Chino Basin Municipal Water District unanimously approved the following motion: MOVED, that the Board of Directors of Chino Basin Municipal Water District convey a genuine and deep interest in participating in a program with Orange County Sanitation District and that we be permitted a period of 30 days to evaluate the program for further determinations. To evidence this District ' s capability and interest in implementing this project, I have set forth the following information: 1) The Chino Basin Municipal Water District is a self- governed District governed by a five-member Board of Directors elected by the resident voters . 2) In 1966, this District constructed and presently operates a non-reclaimable waste water system con- veying saline wastes to the Los Angeles County sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County. 3) In anticipation of an implementation of the Santa Ana River Outfall, this District budgeted the sum of $500, 000 for the fiscal year 1971-72. 4) For a considerable period of time, this District has recognized the desirability and need for conveying 8555 ARCH IBALD AVENUE-POST OFFICE BOX 697-CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 -..........v.r..-.�. . .�........ ...r...�.........��............ ........—..........-- CARL B. MASINGALE RAY W. FERGUSON ERNEST L. KEECHLER ALEXANDER R. TOBIN JACK F. COMSTOCK PRESMENT VICE-PRESIDENT SECRETARY DIRECTOR nsRF�TnR CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT - 8555 ARCHIBALD AVENUE - P. O. BOX 697 - CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA -2- Board of Directors July 28, 1971 saline waters from the south end of our District through some facilities down the Santa Ana River. It is therefore requested that you delay your construction program for a period of 30 days to allow the staff of this District an opportunity to evaluate the costs and needs for the upstream area. Very truly yours, Carl B. Masingale;/President CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT /bd Now, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY Av on- too°litan Or r $race 195+ co'� BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1971- • 2 FISCAL YEAR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 TREND CHARTS 1966/67 THROUGH 1971/72 990 960 i� �5 930 i 1 N 900 cr 13 870 5.0 12 0 84o 0 4.8 cn BUDGETED 810 C 11 REQUIREMENTS 0 4.6 10 7 80 0 cn 4.4 9 z 750 F-4.2 ' _ `� 0 8 720 z g 690 W4.0 cn 7 z 0 03.8 6 660 630 3.6 5 CASH EXPENSE 3.4 466 68 �7 A Z9 70 71 Z Z 3.2 3 F I S C A L Y E A R ` RAISED BY TAXER 2 66 6 68 6 Zo �1 TOTAL ASSESSED VALUATION t' F 71 72 I l I ( l FI S CAL Y EAR 66 6 68 62 Z 71 77 70 71 72, TAX RATE F I S C A L Y E A R TOTAL BUDGET a EXPENDITURES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 BUDGET R ECOPY119 EN RATIONS 1971/72 FISCAL YEAR TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 DEBT t•31 SERVICE .07 SHARE p$ o JO j s DISTRICT �_OPERATING FACILITIES � , � OTIiER EXPANSION s OPER. �\MTCE. $.52. BUDGETED REQUIREMENT DOLLA/� %STATE R �8e FEDERAL TOTAL REQUIREMENTS $14,4432839 GRANTS $.10 .04 CARRY-OVER HgFI RESERVE $-59 I TAX LEVY $.27 SOURCE OF BUDGETED REVE:.NUE DOLLAR TOTAL AVAILABLE $14,4439839 OPERATING FUND ti ACCUMULATED $.20 CAPITAL OUTLAY BOND FUND FucaD 1�'0 ; BOND FUND 1958 M6 i $.12 i TAX REVENUE DOLLAR TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES $3,8889413 UJUI-IY Sn.fM%1 10H DISTRIG i 140. 2 BUDGET RECO EINDATIONS 1971/72 FISCAL YEAR Prelim. 7-23-71 1971/72 ESTUMATED ASSESSED VALUATION 962,009,120 1971/72 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5 %DELIN10. $ 913,9o8,664 1971/72 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 Cr A.V. $ .4255 SUiMMARY ONIE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 91,390 APPROVED APPROVED RECONINIENDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 1969/7o 1970/71 1971/72 RL.w-IIREMENTS Operating Fund 1,225, 614 1,24o,836 1,468, 685 Bond and Interest Fund - 1951 120,206 118,688 117, 170 Bond and Interest Fund - 1958 1,015,250 1,037,450 939,650 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 7,860,363 10,383,887 11,918,334 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 10,221,433 12 780 861 14 43,839 FUNDS AVAILABLE JULY 1 Carry-over (Cash & Investments) 6,383, 623 7,865,097 8,567,298 Other Revenue and Transfers 6o4 683 1,215,751 1 988 128 TOTAL, FUNDS AVAILABLE 6,988,326 080 848 10,555,426 DISTRICTS ' REQUIRMENTS TO BE RAISED BY TAXES 3,233,127 3,700,013 3,888,413 T1^" RATE Actual Actual Est 'd. IMW operating Fund . 0705 . o445 . o851 Bond and Interest Fund - 1951 . 0079 . 0069 . 0066 Bond and Interest Fund - 1958 . 0749 .0657 .05o6 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund . 2728 . 3085 .2832 TOTAL TAX RATE . 4261 . 4256 .4255 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0. �___ BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1971/72 FISCAL YEAR Prelim. 7-23-71 1971/72 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $962,009,120 1971/72 EST. A.Y. ADJUSTED FO Z 5 %DELINQ. $913,908,664 1971/72 EST. TAX RATE PER $ 100 OF A.V. $ .0851 FUND #2 OPERATING ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE 91,390 APPROVED APPROVED ESTIMATED RECOMMENDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET I BUDGET I ACTUAL BUDGET 1969/70 1970/71 EXPENDITURES ' 1 Zo/7-1- i 19-7-IJ-7-2 OF' A, Directors Fees 113400 11,400 ll,200 14,400 I Contractual Services : � I Share of Joint Operating 697,659 682,557 5425305 731,790 Trunk Maintenance 30,000 30,000 � 17,728 40,000 Pump Station Maintenance 8,500 8,500 5,794 83500 Connection Administration 24,0001 . 18,228 35,000 Inter-Dist. Sewer Use Chg. 300 2,0001 1,800 2,000 Bond Collection Expense 1,500 1,200LI 13065 15200 Tax Collection Expense 1,600 1,600I 996 2,100 Utilities 3,500 3,500I 2,292 35500 Professional Services _103000 103000i 10,000 i Printing and Publication 700 500 500 Membership 700 � 658 800 Travel & .Meeting--Directors ' Mileage 450 60o 602 1,000 Total Operating 765,609 776,5571 602,668 8505790 NO*OPERATING Interest 4,8o0 1,5001 1,415 Expenses Applicable to I i Prior Years 2,500 17,985 j 15,000 I Total Non-Operating 4,8o0 A,000 195400 ; 15,000 TOTAL OPERATING & NON-OPERATING 770,409 780,557 622 068 8655790 UNAPPROPRIATED RESERVE 70,000 70,000I 1705000 AUTHORIZED GENERAL RESERVE 3853205 3903279 { 432;895 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 1,225,614 1,240,83611 1,468,685 LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & RESERVE � . Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 70-71 i15240,836 Actual Expenditures 70-71 622 o68" 618,768 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers 20,161 ' ,TARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) 623,674 769,922� 598 607 il 5983607 Delinquent Taxes 225000 18,000 + 9,000 Industrial Waste Charges 43,00o Interest & Misc. Receipts 40,000 60,000j I 4o,000 TOTAL CASH & REVENUE 685,674 847,9 ! 69o,607 AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES 539�.940 392,914 i �' 778,078 I � _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 & 2A BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS Prelim. 7-23-71 1971/72 FISCAL YEAR 1971/72 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $962,936;94o 1.971/72 EST. A.`J. ADJUSTED FOR 5 %DF.LINQ. $914,790,093 1971/72 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF AN. $ - o066 FUND #2BOND & INTEREST - 1951 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ -91,479 APPROVED APPROVED ESTIMATED RECOMMENDED )ESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET 1969/79 1970/71. EXPENDIT 1 �o�RESZl �_ • _�_ 1971/72 I BbWb RETIREMENT AND INTEREST } - • I Principal on Bonds 45,000 453000 45,000 .453000 Interest on Bonds 20,3o6 19,294 19,294 ' 183282 TOTAL 65,3o6 643294 64,294 163,282 AUTHORIZED GENERAL RESERVE 54,900 54,394 53,888 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 120,2o6 1183688 1173170 LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE - Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 70-71 118,688 ' Actual Expenditures 70-71 1 64,294 5 �39 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income 'and Transfers 762 .. CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) 56,415 56,o69 55,156 55,156 linquent Taxes 2,700 13500 1;400 Interest & Misc. Receipts 800 1,000 600 TOTAL CASH & REVENUE 59�,915 58,569 57,156 AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES 60,291 6o,119 6o,o14 I I 1 i 1. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS Prelim. 7-23-71 1971/72 FISCAL YEAR 1971/72 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $9623009 )120 1971/72 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5 %DELINQ. $913,908,664 1971/72 EST. TAX RATE PER $ 100 OF A.V. $ .05o6 FUND #2 BOND & INTEREST - 1958 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 913390 APPROVED APPROVED ESTIMATED ;RECOMMENDED )ESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT .TITLE BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET 1969/79 1970/71. Erg `Pff i_1971/72- B�,r) RETIREMENT AND INTEREST . Principal on Bonds 350)000 350,000 350,000f 3503000 Interest on Bonds 262,250 241,250 241,250 220,250 TOTAL 6125250 5915250 591,250 570,250 AUTHORIZED GENERAL-RESERVE 403,000 446,200 —! 369,E+00 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 1,015,250 1,0373450 939,650 LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENU Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 70-711,037, 50 Actual Expenditures 70-71 1 591,250 ,260 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers 97941 CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) 4185 359 4323216 I ; 456.,141 456,141 !*,,.inquent Taxes 20,000 18,000 ; 13,000 Interest & Misc . Receipts 12 000 15,000 ; 8,000 TOTAL CASH* & REVENUE 450,359 465,216 � 477,141 AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES 564,891 572,234 f62,509 i -- • i j i • j f COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0. _ BUDGET R ECW;11,4 E N DAT I ON S 1971/72 FISCAL YEAR Prelim. 7-23-71 1971/72 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $962,009,120 1971/72 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR5 %DELINQ. $913,908,664 1971/72 EST. TAX RATE PER $ 100 OF A.V. $ .2832 FUND #2 ACCUM. CAPITAL OUTLAY ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE 91,390 APPROVED APPROVED ESTIMATED RECOMMENDED )ESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT .TITLE BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL i BUDGET 1969/70 1970/7.1 EX %ffs j 1971/72 PT'- TECTS AND EXPENDITURESTreatment Plant Plant Expansion & 4,38o,870 5_,164,72512,?90,163 ; 4,416,034' Ocean Outfall No. 2 Reconstruction of Euclid Trunk 2-10-9 Chapman to Ball 80,000 I Contract 2-135 Trask Avenue 90,000 33,0001 52,204 Santa Ana River Interceptor � Trunk to Katella (Without 5,091,000' 255,436! 7,045 ,000 upstream capacity) i. i. Facilities Purchase Payment 4 "r to CSD #3 513200 Master Plan Report 15,000! 14,709 5,300 Joint -Works Equity Purchase 159,793 47,162 473162 District Facilities Improve- ments and Extensions 3,092300 24,000' 103724i 445 ,000 Tax Collection Expense 6,50C 910001, 6,7741 7,000 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 71860,363 lq 383,887( 3,177,172 11,918,334 LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Funds Available July 1 I Budgeted Requirements 70-71 (14 383,887 Actual Expenditures 70-71 ; 3 17 172 7,20 ,715 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers 250,679 CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) 5,285,175 6,6o6,89o` 7,457,394 7,4573394 Delinquent Taxes 87,18 71,972 64,000 q ( Receivable from CSD #3 200,OOC 159,60Q I Joint Works Equity Sale 110,128 q { i Federal and State Grants 61o.675 1,409,000 Interest & Misc. Receipts 220,OOC 260,00C. 290,000 TOTAL CASH & REVENUE 5,792,35E 7,709,14 I 933303522 6 �,)UNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES 2;068,00 2,674,746 2,587,812 . i I i } i I. I i .._..............--.... _ _ _.-.r.. ._.. .-....-w,..........,....-.............«.........or...,..,..»-.-....�...w,snr... ...r.�w�r.....� -_ _ :if�Faa' .v .ama.n..� 1 COUNTY SANITATIJ DISTRICT NO. 2 PROJECTED CASH FLOW STATEMENT FISCAL YEARS 1971-72 THROUGH 1975-76 7/23/71 (Without Upstream Capacity) Description 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 1 79 4-75 1 7 -76 REVENUE Tax Revenue (at recommended tax rate ' of $. 4255) $ 3,8885000 • $ 4,084,000 $ 4,288,000 $ 455035000 $ 4,728,000 i Other Revenue Federal & State Participation 1,409,o00 1,860,o00 11423,000 1,013,000 998,000 Miscellaneous 579,000 4o0,000 4o0,0oo 350,000 350,000 Carry-Over from Previous Fiscal Year 8,567,000 6,502 ,000 4,721,000 3,220,000 1,652,000 Total Funds Available $ 14,443,000 $ 12,846,00o $ 10,832,000 $ 9,086,000 $ 7,728,0oo f f f EXPENDITURES District Construction $ 3,745,000 $ 3,300,000 $ 3,300,000 $ 3,710,000 $ 3,581,000 Bond Retirement 634,00o 612,000 590,000 571,000 554,o00 Other Expenditures - Operating and Joint Works Expansion 3,562,000 4,213,000 3,722,000 3,153,000 3,224,00o Total Expenditures $ 7,941,000 $ 8, 125,000 $ 7,612,000 $ 7,434,000 $ 7,359,000 Carry-Over to Following Fiscal Year $ 6,502,000 $ 4,721,000 $ 3,220,000 $ 1,652,000 $ 369,000 Minimum Necessary Reserve Carry-Over 4,129,000 3,883,000 3,802,000 3,758,0o0 2,393,000 Fund Balance or (Deficit) $ 2,373 ,000 $ 838,000 $ (582,000) $ (2,106,000) $ (2,024,0oo) One cent added to tax rate will raise $ 91,390 $ 95,960 $ 100,758 $ 105,800 $ 111,086 i March 12, 1971 Revised COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN PROJECT f 1 . (Based on Contract witli Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District) Projected ' Contract Start Of Completion Cost Break-down ? Number Reach Construction Date Cost Dist. ,#2 Share Riverside Share i 2-14-1 Ellis Avenue to Edinger Avenue July, 1971 Nov. , 1972 $23700,000. f 2-14-2 Edinger Avenue to 17th Street July, 1971 Nov. , 1972 2,3003000. 2-14-3 17th Street to Katella Avenue July, 1971 Nov. , .1972 33200,000. i $8,200,000. $5,200,000. $3,000.'000. 2-144 Katella Avenue to Riverside Fwy. April, 1972 Nov. , 1973 333003000. 230003000. 1,3003000. 2-14-5 Riverside Fwy. to near County Line April, 1973 Nov. , 1974 5,800,000. 1,5005000o 4,300,000. $173300,000. $ �700,000. ,8 $8 600 000. i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 7/26/71 SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 1970/71 through 1976/77 Total Project Cost 1 70/71 1971/72 1 72 7 1 7 74 1 74 7 1975/76 1 76 77 Santa Ana River Inter- ceptor - Plant No. 1 to Katella $7,3005000 $ 2555000 $357455000 $3,300,000 Santa Ana River Inter- ceptor - Katella to Riverside Freeway 350005000 $3,0005000 Santa Ana River Inter- ceator - Riverside Fwy. to near County Line 3,3005000 3005000 $350005000 l Yorba Linda Pump Station & Force Main 7935000 1625000 $ 631,000 Palm Drive Interceptor 3945000 825000 3125000 Carbon Canyon Interceptor 1,478,000 3105000 1,168,000 South Santa Ana River Interceptor 7455000 156,000 589,000 Richfield Interceptor 38o,000 38o,000 Orchard Interceptor 178,00o 178,000 e Kraemer Interceptor 323,000 3235000 F Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor 549,000 $ 549,0o0 River Crossing Interceptor 204,000 204,000 7.13 $18,644,Ooo $ 255,000 $337455000 $3,3003000 $3,300,000 $35710,000 $355813000 $ ,000