Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971-06-29COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA · P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) June 25, 1971 TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY.SANITATION DISTRICT NO .. 1 .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~- Gentlemen: Pursuant to adjournment of the reguJ.a.r meeting held June 9, 1971, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 will meet 1n a.n a.djourned regular meeting: JWS:gc Tuesda._y, June 29, 1971 a.t 5: 15 p .m. 108hl~ Ellis Avenue J?ounta.in Va.llE:y, California · MAPAG~R 'S AGEr~DA REPOR T County Sanita ti o n Dis tricts P. 0. Box 5175 10844 Ell is Avenue of Orls ng e County, Califor;iia Fo un ta in Valley, Calif., 92708 Dis t ric t No . 7 -Li :30 p .m.< June 29 , 1971 Di s trict No . 1 -5 :15 p .m., Jw1e 29, 1971 The fol l owing is an explanation of the more important non -routine i tems which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are i ot otherwise se l f -explanatory . ***************~**** DISTRICT NO . 7 I t em JJo . 5 ---"---- Proposed Assessment Distrj_ct No. 9. T ol.,phones : Araa Cod o 7 14 540-29 10 962 -24 11 On Jw1e 9th th$ Board consid<:!red a letter f:rorn Prank Ji'. Mead , dated June 3:cd, i ·equesting that the Dist1·ict proceed vrith proposed Assessment DiGt.rict No. 9 . Because of possible partic:Lpation by the City of Orane;e in the corwtruction of a Master Plan se-..rer to the proposed assessment district area, the matter \vas deferred to Jtme 29tlJ for further consideration . Enclosed with the agenda is i:l.. letter from the Orange City Manager advising that agreements have been reacl1ecJ with the property owners within the proposed assessment district fo:r the construction of the Master PJan sewer, and the City Counci l recommends that the j)j_st:rict proceed 1·rith proposed Assessment rn strict l'To. 9 . The action appearing on the agenda d :Lrects the engineers to proceed with the formation of the assessr.ient dist r ict . Item No . 6 Heport of Dj.rector of Finance re : P~ress on General ObligatTon. Bond Sale of ~·1 . QOO > 000 Scneoulet1 for J'lly 21st . The staff ~·r ill present a verbal status report conca 'ning the sale of bonds scheduled for next month . DISTJUCTS 1 J\ND 7 Item No . 7 'Ihe Tcputy progret;}; t>f Reaches l CONSTRUC'.PIOJ\~ STATUS REPOR':P . will rr-port on tl1 c consi·1·ucti.on the Strnflower Inte~captor Sewer - and the design s tatus of t he r emaining faci l ities to be con - st r uct ed t o the Redhi ll Interceptor Sewer . He will also r epo r t on the status of the Distri ct No . 1 Main and Dye r Trunk S ewe r . DISTRICT NO . 1 Item No . 9 AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR JOB NO . I -7 -3 . Bid s on thi s project were taken on June 15th (see bid t abulation attached to the agenda). It is the engineer 's recom- mendation t hat award be made to Healy-Tib bitts Construction Company in the amount of $11.J-2,,478 . FAH :j ·Fred A . Harper General Manager ·. OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mr. Frank F. Mead 20002 East Chapman Ayenue · Orange, California Dear Mr. Mead: June 8, 1971 I read with interest a copy of your let~er of June 3, ·to the attention of Mr. Fred A. Harpe~, Oran~e County Sanitation District No. 7, concerning the pr~posed Assess- ment District No. 9. I must contend that I feel that your sa.tement " • • • the City will not participate or contribute funds." to this assessment district is somewhat misleading i]asmuch as this statement is not qualified or explained in any manner in your letter. As your attorney, Mr. Rodger Howell, do-.:ibtlessly informed you, Mr. Howell, the City Manager, and the City Attorney met with me on Friday, May 21, to discuss th~s entire subject of · providing sewer service to the area encompassed by this Assessment District No. 9. As you know, the City of Orange offered to contribute $35,000 to $40,000 tm·nrd this project to provide a portion of the sewer main extenzion in Chapman Avenue to serve an area which was to encompa.ss the land to be developed for a specialty restaurant as wfll as certain parcels of land on the south side of Chapman owned by certain .other parties, including yourself. As you recall, originally, the City pro}osed an agree- ment with you and certain other property own~rs located within an approximately 90 acres by which agreement the City of Orange would contribute some $35, 000 to $l~O ,©00 toward the extension of the sewer main in an easterly direction along Chapman from which extension the specialty r~staurant property and other properties on the south side of Clnpman could be served by sewer. In addition, the City offered to permit .. IN c 0 R p 0 R "TE;> ..i. FR ii. 6, I a a a Mr. Frank F. Mead June 8, 1971 Page 2 these properti7s to receive sewer service through this city- owned sewer main extension without the necessity of agreeing to annexation to the City of Orange unless the parties (the City and landowners) could agree on appropriate zoning if and when annexation to the city was legally possible. The only penalty which the City of Orange exacted for a failure by the property owners to annex to the city when legally possible to do ·so was a requirement that the property owners reimburse the City of Orange on a prorated bas·is for the approximate $35,000 cost of the extension of the main which the City proposed to assume. In fact, the property .owner of the property to be developed for the Specialty Restaurant appeared to offer to annex said property to the City of Orange without any qualifications or reservations. However, after we had held the first discussions, a revised agreement was presented ~o us by your attorney which proposed to add to the area of some 90 acres originally pro- posed to receive sewer service, an area of soJte 270 acres lying east and north of the area in question. This 270-acre area had not previously been considered by th= City of Orange as an area to receive sewer service under the agreement cover- ing approximately 90 acres which was initially discussed and agreed upon by the parties. As we explained to your legal counsel in our meeting of May 21, the City of Orange could not ma.ke~a similar commitment at this time a·s to the 270 acres lying north and east of the land initially proposed to receive sewer service through the City of Orange sewer main extension. As Mayor, I expressed my continuing of fer to enter an agreement with you covering the original 90 acres. ·. Of course, it was your right ·to reject this proposal of the City and choose to assume all of the cost associated with the extension of sewer service to this 90-acre area without financial assistance from the City. I only review this back- ground and history of our negotiations in view of the fact that I felt your letter did not fully explain these matters. Such an explanation seems significant to ·the City of Orange inasmuch as it is important for the City of Orange to assure· .. --"'-' Mr. Frank F. Mead ·. June 8, 1971 .Page 3 all property owners in this area as well as various local government officials that the C~ty is very willing to dis- cuss and give favorable consideration to providing future city services in this area should property owners choose to annex to the city. Very truly yours, ~cf~~ Don E. Smith Mayor of the City of Orange l>ES:gg cc: B~ard of Directors, . . County Sanitation District No. 7 Attention: Fred A. Harper, General Manager Rodger Howell, Attorney Specialty Restaurants Corporation Gifford w. Miller, City Manager Furman B. Roberts, City Attorney .. Agenda· Item No. \ 2 (a) EXCERPTED FROM MINUTES -DECEMBER 9, 1970 DISTRICT 7 Clarifying District 's current policy concerning issuance of connecti on permits as follows : Moved, seconded and duly carried : That the Dist ri ct 1 s current policy concerning issuance of connection permits be clarified That on July 14, 1970 , the District Boa.rd adopted Ordinanc e No . 712, amending the District 1 s connection and use ordinance , which states that no connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established use of the prope rt y to be served, or a valid buildi ng permit issued which e stablishe s the use of said property . II BOAR DS OF D~REC'fORS County Sanita~ion Districts P .. 0 . Box 5175 of Orange County , Cali fornia I OBLfL~ tllis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 DISTRICT No . 1-7 Adjourned Reg u l ar Mee ting District 7 -June 29, 1971 -4 :30 p.m . District 1 -June 29 , 197 1 -5 :15 p .m. AGENDA ADJOUR NMENTS POSTED.( CO MP & MILEAGE .... ~ .... . .......... FILES SET UP .................... .. (1) Roll Call ~~~ RESO LUTIONS CERTIFI ED .. ~ LffiERS WRITTEN ... ~ ... -- MI NUTES WRITTEN V.:::: .. - """ MINUTES f!LED ............ - (2 ) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern , if necessary ( 3) Repo rt of the General Ma.na.ger (4) Report of the General Counsel (5 ) DISTRICT 7 Discussion re proposed Assessment District No . 9 (a.) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter.from tbe City of Orange dated June 23 , 197J, riff ~roposed Assessment District No . 9. See page A ~) Uonstderation of motion di1ecting the staff ~ and engineers to proceed wit~_ fp1;matio:q. of,~' ~ flssessment District No . 9 ~ ~ t ~-~~<:. · (6) (7) (8 ) (9 ) ~ (1 0) (11) ' ' I ~ -j.,Ut..ic..:t.. DISTRI8T 7 · ~ "'~ Hepo:rt. of Direc'!:.or of Fina.'lce re. $1,000,000 general obligation bond sale °ftµ DISTRic·rs 1 & 7 Report of Deputy Chief Engineer on curren~ and fa.cili ties p1~eseni:;ly under design f...t:L DISTRICT 1 construction progress ~ o-~?f'lJ' ' , \, 'L • /J..>~u~ Conside1·ation of motion c:pp1~oving Addendum rro . l to the plans and specifications for Pump Station and Additions to Bypass Faciliti es at Plant No. 1, Job No . I-7 -3. See page ~~~ DISTRICT 1 Consideration of Resolution No . 71-8'7 -l, to receive \). ~ri and file bid tabulation and. recomrn c.nda tion , a.nd awarding ~ contract f'or Furnp Station and Additions to J3ypa.ss F acjlities at Plant No . 1 , Job No . I -7-3, to Hea.l y Tlbbitts Construction Company in the a.mount of ~>142,4c(8 .00. See pages 11 C11 and 11 D11 DISTRICT J Ot11er lmsiness and comrnunj cations, DISTRICT 1 Consid e ration of motion to adjourn I (1 2) DIS TR ICT 7 / (13) Other business and communications (a) Consideration of request of Edgar E . Panl<:ey· to pay connection charges o n the basis of the current fee sc hedule prior to receipt of building permit for development of p rope rty ~ ~><s::f' bound e d by Laguna Rd ., Redhill and San Juan ?(.> IJ-0 ·~. St . in the Tustin area. See page 11 E 11 (f " (b) Conside ration of motion to r ece i ve and f ile · Claim for Damages to Real Property on Ellmar f\:J~ Circle submitted by James R . Ryan , et al , . I ~ and deny said claim as recommended by the \J Gene r al Counsel DISTRI CT 7 Consi de ration of mot i on to adjourn {;-yo (;. rr '7) e /J,l.L-\.,'(; !.'\. )le \JJ&-' "f ( • ,_, { u I IJ -2- .CQTY OF P .O . BOX 449 300 E AST CHAPMA N AVEN U E TELEPH ONE 633.2300 O RAN G E. C A LI F O RNIA 92669 OFF ICE OF C ITY MANAGER Mr. Fr ed Ha rp e r , Dir ector Or ange County Sanitation District Post Off i ce Box 5175 Fountain Valley, Cal i fornia Dear Fred : J une 23 , 1 971 At the Orange City Counci l m e~ting on Jun e 22, 1971, the Council adopted an agreeme nt wherein ic was s t ated th a t the City wou ld pro- vide assistance to the Sanitation District and to th e property owners in easi: Oran g e in working out an assessment district for the constru ction of a sanitary sewe r to serve the Sp ecialty Restaurant, th e Frank Mead pro perty , and o th er prop e rties in that prop osed district. Please l e t me know what we can do to help . GWM :MMc CC : · John Fonley . Furman Roberts Jim Ev.ans JNC OkPORATED APR i i.. C. 1 000 p ge nda Item #5 (a) -A- Since re l y , f,J, /.) l A \ t'j , J • ... ,..,.._...... Giffordf .1 Miller City 1('\nage r I Di s trict 7 June·9, 1971 ADDENDUM NO. i to Speci:fica.tions and Pla.ns for PUMP STATION AND ADDI'l'IONS TO BYPASS FACILITIES Nr PLANT-NO. 1 ·JOB NO. I-7-3 . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE .COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS Page DS-21-9, Section 21-11; S'J.1EEL PIPE (Bell a.nd Spigot Rubber Joint) Add the following underlined portions to the second paragraph of subsection (b) Pipe.· The steel cylinder sha.11 be fabricated from hot-rolled carbon ste.el plates. The plates shall conform to AS'J.1M A 283, Grade Dor A570 Grade C. The plate thickness shall be .135 11 • The plates shall be fa.5ricated into cylinders with longitudinal or spiral welded seams. All wel.ds shall be done by a process a.pp roved by the Engineer, w.hich produces welds ha.ving a. tensile s_trength at least equal to the minimum tensile strength of the plate. A d It .L,'8 gen a _ .em tt_ JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS -B-District 1 a. Engineer's Est. -$155~000.00 BID TABULATION SHEET Date June 152 1971 11:00 a.m. Contract For: _Pump Station and Additions to Bypass Facilities at Plant No. l Job No. I-7-3 CONTRACTOR l. Healy Tibbitts Construction Co. 1400 West 7th Street Long Beach, California 2. F. T. Ziebarth Company, Inco 21205 Bolsa Street Torrance, California 3. Pylon, Inc. 411 East Greenleaf Compton, California 90224 4. 0 1 Meara & Rogers Construction Corporation 3111 E. Willow Street Long Beach, Cal:l.fornia 5 • Taymech Corpora t:ton 2134 So. Grand Avenue Santa Ana, Californ;a 92705 6. Maecon, Inc. 135l~6 E. Imperial High\<Jay Santa Fe Springs, California 90670 7. E.T.I.-Saliba-Risken, A Joint Venture 9778 West Katella, Suite 103 Anaheim, California 92804 8. J. E. Hoagland & w. W. Hoagland P. O.Box 1947 Long Beach, California 9. Milton Gerstenberger P. O. Box 836 Venice, California 9~291 10.Ecco Contractors, Inc. 1417 Noo Harper Santa AnJl, California Agenda Item #9 -C- TOTAL BID $142,4'78. 00 147,300.00 l!Jl,957. 00 154,750.00 156,881.00 158,872.00 162,910.00 166,380.00 168,674.oo 177,865.00 District 1 RESOIJUTION NO. 71-87-1 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PUMP STATION AND ADDITIONS TO BYPASS FACIL~TIES AT PLANT NO. l? JOB NO. I-7-3 A RESOLUTION OF THE BDARD OF' DIRECTORS OF COUN'I'Y SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PUMP STATION AND ADDITIONS TO BYPASS FACitITIES AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. I-7-3 * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERlvIINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by John Carollo Enginee-rs, and concurred in by the District's Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to HEALY TIBBITTS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY for Pump Station and Additions to Bypass Facilities a.t Plant No. 1, Job No. I-7-3, and the proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed;· and, Section 2. That said contract for Job No. I-7-3, be awarded to HEALY TIBB TTS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, in the total amount of $142,478.00 in accordance with terms of its bid and the prices contained therein; and, -Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessfhl bidders. PASSED.AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regll.la.r meeting June 29, 197:t. Agenda Item #9 . -D-District 1 r..,. ; . June 25, 1971 County Sanitation District #7 P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Calif. 92708 Gentlemen: EDGAR E. PANKEY 320 West Main Street Tustin. California With reference to your increase in connection charges from $100 per unit to $150 per unit effective July 1, 1971, the undersigned wishes to obtain your District's permission to pay the connection charg~s in advance of issuance of building.permits and on the basis of $100 per unit. This would amount to $11 ,200.00 for our 112 unit development. · As you may know, I own most of the property bounded by Laguna Rd., Redhill and San Juan St., in the Tustin area. I have been developing this property under a master plan since July of 1968. During this time your connection · charges have increased from $25.00 to $150.00 per unit and this increase together with other fee increases have created a severe hardship in the de- velopment of the balance of my property. Inasmuch as my property has been zoned for its intended use for several years and we have installed sewer lines in the various rights of way to provide service in accordance with our master plan, it seems reasonable that I request the right to pay these connection charges on the basis of your old fee schedule even though we do not intend to secure building permits for the next several months. My architect, Gared Smith, has completed prelimi.nary studies and has been commissioned to proceed with the working drawings. I anticipate completion of the plans by September l, 1971, after which time application for building permits will be made. In contemplation of your favorable consideration of my request, I enclose my check in the arnoun~ of $11,200.00 payable to County Sanitation District #7. s~ ~e)Y· d;~j//L (/.z i1Y.[: .,·. qi~f(CcP~n~~Y c-t-k;:; "_:__, .· cc: Thoner & Birming am Development Co. Agenda Item 12(a) -E-District 7 I•!c:etinG Date 1t>l~~l~L Time #2-i'.~0 #/-5:15 District 1 ~ ) DISTRICT 1 ·---J OilTT BOARDS GrL~ct J Herrin Culve r Miller " Coco Hemeon Lewis Porter ./ Bawn Ho gard Battin / Berton We stra. ---Christie Root DISTlUCT 2 --Clark Magnus --Davis Fonte Just Ha:cper Stephenson Dutton ---Christie Root Finne11 Gomez 'arl\:. Magnus Co en Yu1ve r Green -~c:Cracke Stephenson Dutton Gris et Herrin -----Finnell Gomez Harve y Kanel Herrin Gri s e t Herrin Gris et Sims Zuniga ---Hirth Croul Smith Hileman Hyde Kroes en 1·Tedaa ---· Machado Just Harper Winn Schniepp ---Mc Innis Hirth Battin ---McWhinney DISTRICT Mil1er Coco 3 ·---~-Parsons Hyd e Kroes e n ---Porter --- Herne on Le1,ris Ro gers Ilirth - Hold en Bogard Shipley dcCra.cke Be ·rton Wes tra Sims Zuniga Christie Roo t Smith Hileman Cl arl<.: Magnus ·---Wedaa Machado Davis Fonte Winn Sclmiep Stephenson Dutton Harper Just Gre en . McCra c ken Battin Harve y Kan<:!l Herrin Gr:i.set -x--x-7:-·X--x-* Culver. Mitchell Ju st ------Boyd Goldber Harp e r -----~cWh:Lnney ims Zuniga OTHERS Battin :~arper .../ Br mm ~ DISTRI CT 5 Sylvester ../ Lewi s / Parson s Carl son Hirth Croul Clar ke Battin Dunn Finster DISTRIC'r 6 GalloNay· Hoh ener / Po.cte:c Hunt --·-Mc I nnis Hirth Ke i tl1 Da.ttin -·-----Lowry ------Maddox DISTRICT 7 Mar tinson Ni ss on .Mille r ,/ Coco P i ersall --Sigler Gi ·ise t ./ Herrin --Stevens Port e r v' -----Hirth ---Crabb RoE_;e.c ~ ~-Smith __ ...\L Hil eman j r:::_v.r-,"fr. yL.,, ... ~ Battin --- ../ --·-----<A'°ft ... J 1A l,,t, 'lIS'l'.lUC'J.1 1 1 ' ------- Shipley J\!c Crack en C.o en · ------- Battin ---- DIST RICT 8· Boyd ---Goldberg ---Mi~c.chcll ------------Battin ---- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CA~IFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE· (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) June 18, 1971 TELE PH ON ES: AREA CCOE 714 540-2910 962-2411 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIHECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 Gentlemen: Pursua!1t to a.djourrunent of the regula.r meeting held June 9, 1971, the Boa.rd of Directors of County Sanj_tation District No. 2 will meet in a.n adjourned regular meeting: JWS:gc Wednesday, June 23, 19'71 at 5:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California SIDNEY L. LOWRY PRESIDENT Telephon~ 541-5301 Area Code 7.14 Mr. Fred Harper LOWRY. AND ASSOCIATES CJVI°L ENGINEERS 121 EAST WASHINGTON AVENUE SANTA ANA, CAL.IFORNIA 02701 June 11, 1971 County. Sanitation Distric.ts of ·orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Dear Mr. Harper: ASSOCIATES HARRY C. BILLINGS. VICE PRES. DONALD J. MARTINSON. VICE PRES. .The following cost estimates have been prepared on the same basis as ~he original cost estimates for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer Pro- ject. Sizes Estimated Construction Cost Pipe Cost, DJM/jh SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER PLANT 1 TO KATELLA AVENUE 184 mgd (Original Design) 84", 81", 72 11 $8,200,000 $3,500,000 100 mgd 66", 60" $6,800,000 $2,800,000 Very truly yours, Lowry and Associates /IJ~J )A;f~~ Donald J. Martinson 65 mgd 60", 51" $6,000,000 $2,500,000