HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971-05-12COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE· (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN C?IEGO FREEWAY)
May 7, 1971
TELE PH ON ES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
TO: MEMBERS OF T~m BOARDS OF DIRECTOHS OP COuN~:Y SAI\1rrA'II.ON
DISTRIC':!:'S tJC1S. 1, 2, 3, 5.: 6, 7, AHD 11 ·---------
Gentlemen:
The next regular meeting of the Boards of D~_rec to :~s o~~ Ccr•J.!!ty
Srn.'li te.tion Districts No. 1, ?. , 3, 5, 6 ~ 7, and 11, of Ora.nge
CouTty, Co.lifornia._, will be held:
Wednesday evening, May ~2, 1971
a. t 7 : 3 0 p . r:: •
l08l~4 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Tentative adjournments prior to next regula.r meeting:
Executive Comml ttee -5: 30 p .m. ~ i.:ay 25th
II
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127
l 0844 Elli s Aven'ue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
REGULP.R MEET ING
Wednesday, May 12, 1971
7:30 p.m.
Area Code 71 4
540-2910
962-2411
May 7, 1971
T'ne follO'wing is a bri ef explanation of the more important non-
r outine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not
otherwise self-explanatory . Wa rrant list.s are not attached to the
agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but
will appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting. ~
* * -)(-* •* * * * -)(· * ·X-·::* * * *
Joint Boards
No. 3 -SEATING OF NEW DIRECTORS: Our office is currently being
advised of recent elections of new mayors, appointment of alternates
to the mayors and other new directors . A complete listing of new
directors and alternates will be available at the meeting .
Nos . 4 -10 -ANNUAL ELECTION OF DISTRICT CHAIRMEN: In accordance .
with the Districts ' standing procedures, a Chairman for each·District ·
Board is elected annually at the regular May meeting . Beginning this
year, the Joint ·chairman and Vice Joint Chairman will be elected at
the July meeting, following nominations at the June meeting.
The District Chairmen for the past year were as fo llows:
District
1
2
3
~
7
11
Chairman
Lorin Griset
Edward Just
Norman E . Culver
Lindsley Parsons
Ellis N. Porter
Clifton C. Vdller
Donald E. Shipley
Representing
Santa Ana
Fountain Valley
Garden Grove San . Dist.
Newport Beach
Costa Mesa San . Dist.
Tustin
Huntington Beach
For the information of the new Di r ectors, the Districts' ·regu-
lations provide that each Chairman automatically becomes a member of
the Executive Committee which meets monthly to study and made recom-
mendations ~o the Joint Board concerning joint operations such as
budgets, salaries, personnel, policies, etc . (see Items Nos . 16 -18).
The representative f r om the County Board of Supervisors is also a
member of the Committee .
Nos. 16 -18 -REPORT OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND ACTIONS ON
COMMITTEE 'S RECOMMENDATIONS: The Committee met on the evening of
April 27 with Di r ector Finnell as g uest. A r eport on the meeting,
together with the recommendations to the Joint Board has been previ-
ous l y mailed to the Direc tors. Agenda Item No . 18 (a and b) is con-
s i deration of the recommendations reached by the Committee at this
meeting .
Although the Committee has no recommendation for action by the
Joint Board at this time on these matters, Items Nos . 3 and 4 of the
Committee's report are of extreme importance to the Dist ricts since
they will influence to a large degree the Districts' future financing
program . The staff ·will be prepared to go into greater detail on
these matters at the meeting, if desired .
No . 19 -CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS : The staff has chosen the following
agenda items which are believed to fall into this category in accor-
dance with the definition establis hed by the Board:
(a)
(b)
( c)
Award of Purchase of Sewer Rodding Machine -Bids for this
budget ed sewer maintenance equipment were opened on April
1 2 and it is recommended that the award of purchase be
made to the Southwest Flexib l e Compa ny at its low b id of
$6,524 .49 . A bid tabulation is included with the agerida
ma t erial.
Request to Add Subcontractor on Plant Job No. P2 -17 -
This Plant construction contract (Sedimentation Bas in 11 K11
and Digester 11 K11 at Plant No . 2) is now getting under way
and we have received a letter from the contractor, J .
Putnam Henck, A Corporation, San Bernardino , requesting
that he be permitted to add a subcontractor, Standard
Metals, Orange, for the reasons stated in his letter, a
copy of which is included with the agen da material. The
General Counse l r ecommends denial of the request, since
the reasons given by the contractor do not meet the require-
ments of Section ~109 of the Government Code.
Apnroval of Plans and Specj_fications for Pump Station and
Additions to Bypass Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No . I -7 -3 -
The first scheduled Plant construction job to be undertaken
in the next fiscal year is the above facility which must
be completed before the new Sunflower Interceptor, now
under construction for Districts Nos . 1 and 7, becomes
operational . This facility_, which consists of a small
pump station and force main at Plant No . 1, will transfer
flows from the Sunflower Interc eptor to Plant No . 2 unti l
the new Interplant Interceptor and r elated faci li tj_es can
be put into operation in about two years. 'rhe project has
been designed so that the force main and pumping equip-
ment can be r emoved and salvaged if it is determined to be
-2-
no longer needed for this purpose . Our Plant design engi -
neers have submitted plans and specifications and the staff
recommends advertising for bids to be opened on June 15
in order that a contract may be awarded and construction
begun immediately afte r beginning of the next fiscal year.
The engineer's estimate of construction cost is $155!000.
District No. 5
Nos. 27, 28 and 29 -ANNEXATION AND DE'I1ACHMENT REQUEST, IRVINE COMPANY :
Inc l uded in the agenda material is a letter from the Irvine Company,
dated April 12, which we believe is self-explanatory. In accordance
with the District's established annexation policy, the act ions indi -
cated on the agenda are rec ommended .
District No . 7
No. 36 -CHANGE ORDER NO . 3 TO CONTRACT NO . 7-6 -1 (SUNFLO WER I NTER -
CEPTOR, FROM PLANT NO . 1 TO BEAR STREET): The original plans and
specifications for this job provided for the open-cutting of Harbor
Boulevard crossing during off-peak ·traffic hours at night . The
contractor, Sully-Miller Contr ac ting Company, has requested that he
be allowed instead to tunnel under Harbor Boulevard at no additional
cost to the District. This proposal is satisfactory with the Di strict 's
Fngineer and staff since it will ease the traffic problem on t hi $
busy thoroughfare.
No. 37 -CHANGE ORDER NO." 1, SUNFLOtvER INTE RCEPTOR , CON1I'RACT NO. 7-6-2:
This recommended no cost change order me re ly adds certain Federal
contract requirements which were inadvertently omitted f rom the origi -
nal specifications. Althoug h the District has been advised that no
Federal or State funding will be available for this wo rk at this time,
we believe it prudent t o include the Fede ral requir ements in the
contract in the event that funds become available at a later date on
a r eimbursement basis .
No . 38 -TEMPORARY RIGHT OF WAY, CONTRACT NO . 7-6 -1: In the contract
for this job the District has agreed to provide temporary work ing area
along certain stretches of Sunflower Avenue ovmed by C. J. Segerstrom
and Sons . The General Counse l has advised that he is preparing a
license agreement for the temporary use of the necessary l and which
will be repo r ted on by him at the meeting .
Distr ict No. 11
No. 42 -CHANGE IN CONTRACT PROV I SION FOR SERVICE TO SUNSET BEACH
SANITARY DISTRICT : The Directors will recall that earlier this year
the District.entered into an ag r eeme nt with the City of Huntington
Beach providing for sewerage service for the Sanitary Dist ric t, whi ch
l ies outside the Sanitati on District bo undari es . This agreement
·requires the annual payment of the sum of $4~764 .26 fo r capital cost
replacement of the District 's faci l ities . The City has now requested
that the date for the beginning of this annual payment be established
as July 1, 1971 instead of January 1 as provided in the agreement .
The staff agrees with the City that since service to the Sanitary
-3-
District did not actually commence until April 5, it is appropriate to
extend the initial payment date to July 1 as r equested . Accordingly,
approval of an amendment to the agreem~nt to effect this change is
r ecommended .
District No . 2
Nos . 47 and 48 ~ FIVE YEAR MASTER PLAN OF WASTE WATER FAC ILITIES: The
report on this plan was distributed to the Board members at the reg u-
l a r Apr i l meeting and was further considered at the adjourned meeting
on April 19, at which time a public hearing was called f or the reg ular
May meeting . This interim report was prepared primarily as a requi r ed
document to accompany an application for State and Federal financing
for the Santa Ana River Interceptor, which has now been fi led . This
r eport will be followed by a final report on the ultimate needs of the
District when it is determined that State and Federal assis tance will
be forthcoming .
Following the public he a ring , it is recommended that the report
be taken under advisement at this time, pending final determinat ion
of the as yet unresolved que s tion of State and Federal assistance .
District No . 3
Nos . 52 and 53 -COMPLETION OF LOS ALAMITOS PUMP ING STATION, CONTRACT
NO . 3-12:· It was determined that the contr a ct or on this job, Merco
Construction Engineers, satisfactorily comp leted his work on May 4
and the station v.rill be put into service immediate ly, thus e l iminat ing
the use of the deteriorated and frequently ruptured Westside force
main . The Directors will r ecall that the other three contracts,
collective ly termed the Westside Interceptor Facilities, to provide
new and expanded service for the west side of the District have
already been c omp let ed but cannot be used until this pump station is ·
put into service.
During the latter stage s of the contractor 's work various
miscellaneous items of extra work were authorized, agg r egat ing the
total of $1,871 .51, as detailed on r ecommended Change Order No . 5
include¢. with the agenda material (Item No . 52). This change order
a l so grants an extension of time of 68 days to the contract for the
reasons set forth in the change order . Item No . 53 is the customa ry
resolution accepting the job as comp l ete and authorizing filing of a
Notice of Comp l etion.
No. 5~· -AWARD OF BEA.CH RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, CONTRA.CT NO . 3-16 : The
scope of this sewer project was described at the time the contract
was authorized for bidding . Bids will not be opened until next
Monday, May 10, and.accordingly a recommendation for award cannot be
made at this time. Howe~er, a bid tabulation and a recommenda tion
wi l l be included in the fina l agenda material fo r the meeting ..
-4 -
No . 55 -APPROVAL OF LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE SANTA FE RA I LROAD
(CONTRACT NO . 3-16): The above -descriped Beach Re lief Trunk Sewer
will cross the railroad 's right of way in Buena Park. The railr oad
company requires a formal lic ense agreement for the crossing, autho-
rized by the Board. Accordingly, app ro val of the agreement is
recomm e nded.
No . 56 -AC Q,UISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY , CONTRACT NO . 3 -17 : At the
re g ular meeting in March, the General Counse l and the Dis trict's
engineers were authorized to meet with r epresentatives o f the Southern
California Edison Company relative to acquisition of right of way
throug h a portion of the Compan y's transmission line right of way for
construction of this contract, the first phase of the p lanne d Knott
Intercep tor .
A verbal report on the progress of these negotiations wi l l be
presented at the meeti ng . It appears that the Edison Company is
adamantly opposed t o our proposa l for the reasons given in their
letter> inc l uded with the agenda material .
No . 57 -AGREEMENT WITH FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FOR INSTALLATION OF
A PORTION OF CONTRACT NO. 3 -17 : The Orange Coun ty Fl ood Control
District proposes, in the near future, to construct a new culvert
for the Talbert Channel crossing of Ellis Avenue in Fountain Val l ey .
This new culve rt will be in the path of the construction of the ~irst
segment of the Knott Inte r ceptor , descri bed in the preceding item .
Since the culvert construction wi ll take place be f ore the sewe r con-
struction, it has been agreed by the staffs of Flood Control District
and our District that it would be much le ss expensive for the Flood
Control District t o instal l a short section of the 96 -inch Knott
Interceptor under the n ew cul vert concurrently wj_th the culvert con-
struction, rathe r than re quire the District's contractor to tunnel
unde r it lat-er . Consequently, a formal agreement with the Flood
Contro l District has been prepared providing for the sewer construction
to be included in the culve rt contract with reimb ursement of the sewer
construction costs by the Sanitation District . It is recommended
that the agreement be app roved at thi s time in order that the Flood
Control District may include,. as a separate bid item, the Sanitation
District's approved sewer plc;i.ns and specifications with thei r culvert
contract .
No . 58 -REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL ON MANHOLE COATING LITIGAT I ON :
This case went to tria l during the week of Ap ril 19 . The Ge neral
Counsel will report on the outcome and on possible further legal
moves by the District in thi s connection .
No . 59 -· APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CO NVERSION OF
WESTSIDE PUMP STATION TO LIFT STATION : The work nec essary f or t he
permanent conversion of the existing Westside Pump Station to a
lift station was described to the Directors in some detail earlier
.in the year when the District 's engineers were authorized to desi g n
the conversion . At that time, the tentative ·decision was made by the
staff to recommend that the work be done by our own f orces . However,
-5-
the General Counsel advises that this procedure wou l d have questionable
legality in view of the statutory limit a tion on t he amount . Accord-
ing ly, we are recommending that the pl"ans and specifications be
approved and that formal bids be taken at a date to be establ ished by
the General Manager .
In the meantime, a temporary a rrangement has been made to
divert wastewater from this station to the newly operational Los
Alamitos Pump Station (see It ems Nos . 52 and 53).
No . 60 -AUTHORITY TO PURCHASE PIPING, VALVES AND FITTINGS FOR
WESTSIDE PUMP STATION: Anticipating a rathe r slow delivery date on
some of the materials necessary for the above -describ ed permanent
pump station conversion, the staff has s olicited bids on the piping
materials specified by the District's engineer. We recommen d that
the award of P\l-rchase be made to Keenan Pipe and Supply Company in
the amount of $6 ,846.82 for this material to be installed by the
successful bidder on the conversion job or, in the event of no b i ds
or uns atisfactory bids being received, for installation by our own
forces . A bid tabulation is enclosed with the agenda material.
-6-
Fred A . Harper
General Manager
( ( Agenda ftem No. I ~~
EXCERPTED FROM CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
ELIGIBLE PROJECT LIST FOR STATE & FEDERAL CONSTRUCTION GRANTS
1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 1974-75
Group I Projects -
Treatment Facilities,
Outfalls and Class A
Interceptors $12,860,000 $ 4,010,000 $ 4,150,000 $ 4,080,000 $ 3,850,000
1975-76 Total
$28,950,000
-Group III Projects -
Class B Interqeptors 19;484,ooo 6,957,000 io,110,000 12,234,ooo $1,457,000 50,242,000
Total $12,860,000 $23,494,ooo $11,107,000 $14,190,000 -$16,084,ooo $1,457,000 $79,192,000
( (
!MIICIPAL FISCAL YE.\H PROJECT LIST
F:!cility ~!~~ of Proj~e:t .... ,,~rl
Rcsf::n.::;iblc i~c~-::..cy
~A-30-735 Los Alisos Water District
SA-30-737 )County Sanitation Districts of
Orar.ge County -Plunt 2
8B-33-790SJ Easi2rn ~~nicipal ~ater District
jimprovemcnt Dist~ #17
SB-33-756
S·B-36-775
SB-36-760
SB-36-776
RubidotL"< Corr;r:uni ty Services
District
Onta1,io-Uplcnc.l Te1"tia1•y Treatment
Plant -Chino Basin Municipal
Wa te1, Dist1,ict
Big I<ear Valley Corr.bined
Facilities -Big Bear Lake San.
Dist. & Big Bear City Corru~unity
Services Dist.
Cit"y of Chino
Projoct l
Gr.)U!J D:-;.~:tci" I;~::>c::i:;:tic::i ol Project
I
I
I
I
I
T
.J...
I
't
Enlargement of facilities,
participate in Ocean
i Outfall
f 1 H2ad·:-1or!(S exp ans ion,
I interplant :Lrifluent
. interceptor, expaasion
of plant
j ·--· I
!
Combine, expand and up-
grade joint tertiary
t1,ea tment & outfall
Upgrade Sludge digestion
and chlorination facilitieE
1·'1CCll l'.C~
Cc:!structic:i
to JJ~~tn ,
1970-71
1970-71
1970-7+
1970-71
1970-71
1970-71
1970-71
(
E-'.lcin SAR-8
Page L\-1
j?l,000
12,860
Eli.:;i-:::l~ for G:-=.:J."'
P:.rt;i.c!;c.~.ic:l
L~OO, 000
12,360,000
1,500 1,500,000
1,000 1,000,000
1,920 _ 1~855,COO
780 780,000
4-0LS 401,500
Fncility I 1:0.
8 B-36-755
8 A-30-737
SB-33-767
SB--33-769
8 3-3 6-77l~
SB-36-752
SA-30-737
.
A ppr:( ... LX A (
CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES COI:'IBOL BOARD
HUIHCIPAL FISCAL YEAR PiiOJECT LIST
?'!'""-~ .. ...___ of Project end
Respo!lsible Ascncy
City of Colton
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County -Plan.t 2
Jurupa Cormmmity Services Dist.
City of Corona
Cucamonga County Watel." District
City of Redlands
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County
Project.
Group
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\ i-·iscul "X co.r
I Co!lctruct~cm
Briet D~scriptic~ of Project to Eegin ,
EXpQ~d plant from 2o4 to
5. L~ rngd
Metering & connections for
Intcrplcint influent in-
terceptor; Treatment Plant
e:qxrn.s ion & improvement;. ,
Odor Control Facilities~
Shovs & ~far·2house
Repair of Existin~ Filter,
Addition of Filter,
Secondary Clarifier and
Digester i
Rep lac cm'2nt of t-:eter,
Sludze Thick:;:r.er Addition
Abandon plant & construct
interceptor to facility
No. 8!3-36-775
Construct 3 mgd expansion
& modifications to existing!
plant
Expansion of Treatm2nt
Plant, Effluent pump
station expansion, Odor
Control Facilities
1970-71
1971-72
1971-72
1971-72
1971-72
1971-72
1972-73
fuGin_j __ .~_-_8 __
Page A-2
Tot.:ll I Eligible f c:' G~
$1000 . Partici~tio~
~.00071 2,qo?,soo
4,010 4,010,000
500 SOG .JlQO
50 50,000
700 700,000
2,000 2,000,000
4-,150 4,150,000
I __________ __._ _________________ ~--~--------~~--L---~--~--1-..~.~--------~--~~·~-------__..------------------------1~-------~-----~l
..
( . APPE(.Y. A
CALU'ORI!IA ST.ATE WATER RESOURCES CQlITRJL BOA.HD
1-HJNICIPAL FISCAL YFAR PROJECT LIST
Fc.cility
r:o.
SA-30-739
SB-36-776
SA-30-737
?~a=.c ~ Proj~ct c:ld
Respo~siblc Ascncy
El Toro \fa ter District
City of Chino
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County -Plant'#2
8B-33-791SJ Sun City Plant; Eastern ~runicipal
\·~a ter Dist1"'ict
8B-33-792SJ Sunnyr.-:end -Improvement Dist. #19
Eastern Municipal \·Ja ter Dist o
SB-33-10
SB-36-773
Riverside Co. Flood Control &
Water Conservation Dist.
City of Fontana
Project
Group
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Brief Dzccripticn of Project
Construct Se\1Jage Treatment
Plant, Participate in
Ocean Outfall
Expand plant to 9mgd,
Provide 9 MGD Tertiary
treatment, Construct
interceptor
Eead\·:orks expansion. at
Plant No. 2~ expansion
of facilities
Additional Secondary
system plus solids handlin~
facility
Addition of similar
Increrr.ent to Present Plant
+ solids handling
equip:m~nt
Interceptor, 1st Stage_
50 MGD (Su.line Line)
Expar:.d plant to S.O mgd
and upgrade to Secondary
l":Iscal c~·
Ccnstruct.ion
to Begin ,
1972-73
1972-73
.I
1973-71+
I
1973-74
1973-74-
1973-7L~
1973-74
Page A-3
Tot.:...l Elisible fc~ G~:
$1, 000 Fo.~t.icipo.t::.c:l
2,IJDO 2,100,000
5,500 s,soo,ooo
4-'080 4-,080,000
75C 750,000
750 750,000
(_-
3, 756 3,756,000
2,500 2,500,000
( (
i\PPa7DTX A·
CALITORH!A STA'IS WATZ11 RESOURCES COitTROL ECAPJ)
i.;mncIP.\L FISCAL YE.lu'1 P?.OJECT LIS:?
r~cility
~Zo.
3A-30-73 7
rn-33-767
rn-33-765
3B-33-766
3B-33-ll
l!C!::.:? of Project c..::.1
Rc~i;cncibl~ AGcr.i.cy
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County
Jurupa CoITmunity Services Dist.
City of Riverside
Rubidoux Coirnnunity Services Dist~
Riverside County Flood Control &
Water Conservation District
3B-3 6-751 Yucaipa (unincorporated)
3B-36-776A Calif. Institution for Women
Project
G:i.'OUJ?
I
I
I
I
I
I
'T'
.L
.li"iCC.:ll 't c;:.:,.•
Cc:i-:>t:.1.··11ctic:i
D~icl V~~c~iptic~ ol Project to B2,3b '
Expansion of facilities 1974--75
IAdd Tertiary Tr2ats2nt 1975
(Coagulu. tion-Sedirnenta tion-
f il tration-chlori.11ation)
l~dd Tertiary tr22tment 1975
(Coagulu.tion-sedirn2ntation-
fil tration-chlo:"ination)
Add Tertiary tr2atment'
(Co~gulation-sed.i..m2nt:l.tion
filtration-chlorination)
Interceptor, 2nd Stage
Saline Li:n2
Provic~2 s2·:mge trea bnent
and disposal system of
3.0 mgd
Abandon plant & provide
pump station & inter-
ceptor to Chino
1975
1975
1974--75
1974--75
(
Page A-L!-
To~:U Eli:i~l~ to~ G~~t
$1000 P::::.-t.ici:::l.·t::.c:i
3,850 3~850,000
180 180,000
1,200 1,200,000
180 180,000
3,760 3,760,000
3,50C 3,500,000
300 300,000
~·
S~-3C-773
S.L:-36-750
(
·2:1t~ :::~2.s-: ... -~]J.~::~ Te :::t.i:: .. ~~~/
'I~·<:~a·~:·:·.2:1-~ ?::~:!t -C~:2.~·J l::::si.:1
BiG ~>:2..:~ \/J.ll2~.' Cc~-i~~oir:~cl
!?acil2.ti2s -Ji,g :,.:;:~:.~ Lai~e
Dist.-Big Ee3r Co~n. Ser. Dist.
City c'i Co.lto:-i
I
I
l
i ,
l
I
l
I
I
I
i
l
I
!
\
I
i ,
I
I ~
~-·
J
~· ..... ~ -~ -~ .~ .. t '"" -.. / t.) ·--..,
1 e:_..~,~:::
.i
I
I
( ..................... (
j
j
j
I 197~~-75
i
l
f
• !
I
l
i
I
l
i
I
I
i
I
l
!
I
!
l
I
I
I t
l
!
I\ '
( ( (
APPENDIX A fucin SAR-8
CALL.'7'0?JlIA S'L\':i'E \IAT~~ RESCURCES COiiTRO!. BOA .. 'ID
Page 6
i.rtf.IICIPAL FISCAL YEAR PRCJ:SCT LIST
Proj:::ct
\ l"'icca.l Ycu L:-c~:l:,::a c .. :c::~
F~cility Na:::c of Project c.nd ( Cc:::lGtruct~c:i ?o~ IEliSi~l~ for 2::---::.~
:ro. Rcsp~~nibl~ Acc~~y Grc;..:p T-h·icf D~ ::;crij_·.;-tio::i of Proj~ct to B~g:!.n 1 SlOOO l p..., ~~-i'"'" ,......::L._ .• c:i ~-"" '-•J; iv ••
·A-30-737 County Sanitation Dist1"icts of III Construct Clu.ss B 1971-72 19 , 4-SL!. 19 ,L~Sl~,000
Orange County Intcrceptm's
Q u
A-30-737 County Sanita.tion Districts of III Const:ruct Class B 1972-73 -6,957 6,957,000
Orange County Int21'ceptors 8
8 A-30-737 County Sanitation Districts of III Construct Class n 1973-74-10,llC 10,110,000
01"'ange County -Sanitation Inte1~ceptors
Dist1"'ict No. 2
~i\-·3 0-7q.lj. City of Brea, Orange County rrr l\.krndon oxich1 tion pond 1973-74-1,500 1,500,000 ..i...L
facility by ticing into
County system with
interceptor
SA-30-737 County Sanitation Districts of III Construct Class B 1974--75 12 '23l! 12 ) 2 3 L~ , Q 0 0
Orange County inte1'ceptor
BB-36-757 Lytle Creek Area III Install collection system, 197l~-75 60[ 600,000 .
Unincorporated nuild interceptor s.e~·:er
to City of Rialto syst~m
A-30-737 County Sanitation Districts of III Construct Class B 1975-76 1 u .... -l ,l~S 7, 000 ' •'::JI !
Orange County interceptors 8
;
:
:
i
I
·'<
...
,-
0
-:--!
~-'> r:
f \ :1 . ' ~ \
~-! r;' --:--~
~ -.
::..1
-;j
.-i
731
:nJ -
}·
I
I
l
I
I
i
I ·\
i
l l.
I
l
I
I
(
c:: t j_ ty c:· ;·..:::::. i.~
c:~:>~Y · .... :: :_:.: ! -~·
:::z,:ri:_::tic:;.
c:.'"' ?\:,~':c~:·~· 1.:::.
(''"' ...... -""I '"'"" ~--··-· ~-
,_ .• ;--·::i 1 ) .. ·-...... ----:.--
( (~
L:L~:(!•\;:.;..~~:l .\:··...:::.. ::~r:<'l.:; ('I'3bt!2.J.~C by c:c.s .. G c::.: ;:~'.S~C c.::J. D:·...:.ir::...:;c Si..:.":..;1.: . .'.lsir.)
(;.·· .... ") t ..., ___ -I
"". •;:' I ":')op·~ 1 Cl._ -I r. '1 C ·"' ';') -•• r: . .-.._ ~ f" l D2 :.>::..·ii):-:!. c:.i c~
~·:,·:.:~ c:' :1:::·i,~s
.;~:4'~cJ. C.:)Vt.J~c~,-
V-I ~ _~_ .... ...,_. ___ -_,_. __ ;J ...... -
s~::·; vb Sc:.--11.c~ ;~;:.:..·.
; ... :-~::'.
C-· 1· -;-.-:-·---::.·• ~.··-:'-·--1
...... J.., , • . I ~ ,~· -·1---... : _-; "'-· ,.., ._,... ~-~ .-~ I_·~ :,_,_-. ----:--_,... r: ~-',..:.. "'.: -":>-~ ~ • -:~.; -\: ~.: ~1 :: ·-:. .. : ~ .. ~,-.. '.., ";;',..•-.!~-···--· --. -_..... -:::: ------, 1,. ~-~:;-;:~.!:;~;.·.:-·' ---~ ,cc-:::' .. ::;: -'-·----1 --I ::.c_c::·::i:::.· ~:,·:.:::= --·--------~ r-r);o--1:-05-~11 ~;:-:;-!i.· ~-:.-=j --1,;, L~:~ c:;:::: t~ ;
1
: ~--~--~-~-~_L_~,~ ~--::-~·~ ~; I i::.:;:..c ~.;-.--.--~ :: ...
l~r· ~'~l ! -·, r-J,-1 ~-j --~~--_-_-.~.-_~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~~-!~.~.-.~~-.~
:-·:-·u-,.:,L;.,u·..J1_1 .~,~.L .... i'.J.:.~u0~; J..»JD2 !-.·..=·::c i;__:;J.J..~1:::::::.::...c::
l 1 I pl',~c.~u;;;~~::...:::t~y J~ys :2::·.
2,800
I' .... ~ ... -....-... .-.. --1-,· -i ; ..:...... ,. -.. '-"----+-..... ..; ... .._..., . __ '.; I L~ .. '.. . .:L.1..! •• ;;:~ .... I ~rl di.spa.: ~Ll
2 ,3CJ. 2, 70) ::: ,100 I ,\E C.::c2stic: I ~:'.)1'8 ,:::~:~tim~
.
I
I
l
I
I
I
I.
I ' ' l I I j'::~~~=~'.~~ ·-~" 1 i r~~~,~~~~;lto
I j
I I
! I
i
i
!
.1
(
----··------· ------------· ·---· ---
!;.:.:: ~ c~' c :::.:.:·_.-:_..._-:.· / l ..... ::,.-...... --t·~ I
-=~~-=~-~~:.~-----·---·=·:--_:]_ -~~::L~:C ____ .:_ ..
n
I
i I ;~i.2.y 'i\.:2.i] Co.
I
I I h., .::; ·.ric:. 2 I OU -cfc~l.l
i1 ,:::-~, -.·_\"_ ..... ~ ·'.·. r-. ~ • T°l • • __ ~ ~ ~r~~2r~:i~~Qi~rcv1u~
jLe~~n ?r~2~c~3 ~!v. I
IJ Su·11 __ ,\.'i"'° ,.,"~"'·"'-." 7 ·-~ '"1'0-\'.l.:,;,, ---"-'-\..J-..,.J~ .......... ~:-··-· J.. '--'-
! 0:!..'~l:-l~e ?2:'c·:.:.:c"'.:s u::x •.
t
t j
t
l
r
l
t
f
l
I
. • I ~ •
.:::;, .:.~·. -· ..J
----------···-----·
·'"' ..... :· ~ •"'' ..
\,,;· ....... ~-1t\.,l-.J
---------._._.._ -·--------,
~<-::. --:....·!.. ·:.· ~-~--~· !
I
I
1·
I
Cc~~s \: :: ~~~ -~~c~ t E:::; ·:.:::..::: -~~J. O.:: ·~
1971-72
i.972-75
i
l
i
I
\
i
' l
l
I
t
t
I
I
t
I
{
i
I
l
l
i
l
I
I t
l .,
i
.!
!
i
. '\
Chairman Cul ver
Report of the Joint Chairman :
1 . Propose the adoption of Resolutions of Commendation for
r e tiring Di re ctors:
2 .
Norma Gibbs
Gi l bert Arbis o
App oint a replacement for Mrs . Gibbs who was Chairman
·of the special committee on Directors ' compensation .
(~.~~~~~) .
. '
Present Maintenance Certificates issued by the Califo rnia
Water Pollution Control Association to the following
employees who have voluntarily completed the course of
study and passed the Association 's written examination:
W • Cridlebaugh Grade II JJ .-\\
Grade IV W. E . Earle
P .~d." Hitchcock ·Grade IV
.,.
J .~~ Turbeville Grade I V
Present Operator Certificates issued by the Ca l ifornia
Water Pollution Control Association to the following
employees who have vol untarily completed the course of
study and passed the Association 's written examination :
Keith L. Davis Grade II
James M. Elo Grade IV
William C. Ewers Grade III
Albert K. Howe Grade IV
Dale Sparks Grade I V
Luther H . Ward Grade II
3 . Call meeting of the Executive Committee for 5 :30 p .m.,
Tuesday; May 25th .
Invite the following Directors to attend :
Director Clark
Director Rogers
or
Director -G r een
SPECIAL COMMITTEE APPOINTED 3/10/71 re Changes in Directors
Fees Schedule and Board Operational Schedule
Chairman:
Robert Finnell
Jo seph Hyde
Lindsley Parsons
Don Smith
Mark Stephenson
C. Arthur Nissan , ex offico
l
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
May 1, 1971
INTERIM REPORT TO THE JOINT BOARDS OF THE ORANGE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ON THE PROGRESS OF THE
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT
TELE PH ON ES:
A.REA CODE ?14
540-2910
962-2411
To state at this time that the ocean is so large and has
shown such an ability to recover from tremendous natural shocks,
that the proportionately minimal and strictly controlled emissions
of the Southern California outfalls WJuld have little, if any,
overall effect on the marine ecology, would be anticipating a
desired conclusion.
It appears, however, from the present thinking expressed
by Professor John D. Isaacs of Scripps Institute of Oceanography,
University of California at San Diego, the final results of the
SCCWRPA study may demonstrate that stricter controls of minerals,
chemicals and industrial wastes may be indicated, but the discharge
of the normal treated effluent might even have a beneficial effect
on the marine ecology. Any opinions expressed at this time, however,
must be considered only as conjectures, since the study has just
reached the halfway mark.
The first two months of the SCCWRPA study were spent on the
selection of the Consulting Board which resulted in the ultimate
choice of Dr. Isaacs as chairman, with Dr. Richard K. C. Lee,
Dr. Erman A. Pearson, Dro Donald W. Pritchard and Dr. John H. Ryther
as members. All of these men are world renowned authorities in the
fields of public health and oceanography.
Since this was the first study of the effects of ocean dis-
charge on the marine ecology, selection of a Project Director was
undertaken with extreme care. From a field of 272 applicants, a
group of three top candidates was recommended to the Commission.
The man finally chosen to head the project was George E. Hlavka, Ph. D.
Dr. Hlavka's first task was to establish a headquarters and assemble
a staff of scientists and oceanographers in order to enter upon
Phase 1 of the project, the evaluation and assembly of all heretofore
published scientific papers and related material pertaining to coast-
line ocean pollution.
The first phase of the project has finally been concluded,
and two reports relating to Phase 2, prepared by staff members,
have been submitted in draft form to the Consulting Board and the
Commission, prior to general release. Titles of the two reports
are presented in the following excerpts from the Progress Report
of the Consulting Board and the Manager's Report presented at the
April 8th meeting of the Commission, as follows:
. ·RE: CONSULTING
BOARD -REPORT
The president called upon
Professor John D. Isaacs,
Chairman of the Consulting
Board, for a report on activities of said Board, in
accordance with Section 5c of the Joint Powers Agreement.
Professor Isaacs reported on the activities of the
Consulting Board to date and stated that the entire
Board is impressed by the extent of the stated objec-
tives of the project, and that these allow for a
unique independent examinatiop of the marine aspects
of wastewater discharge. He stated that the project
provides for immediate, as well as long-term, benefits
through its approach to problems such as those related
to natural fluctuations of the environment. The
solutions and general approach apply not only to
Southern California but are expected to have more
universal application.
In answer to a question by Commissioner Parsons
about the project's rate of progress, Professor Isaacs
stated that he is usually displeased with the progress
of any research project with which he is associated
and that progress in this case was also disappointing.
However, he pointed out that at the outset the
Commissioners had accepted the recommendation of the
Consulting Board that an unconventional approach
should be used, and that it would be painfully slow
initially, yet much more likely to have significant
impact ultimately.
Professor Isaacs explained that it is the recom-
mendation of the Consulting Board that further studies
of the effects of heavy metals and pesticides be made.
He emphasized the evident capability of the ocean
environment to absorb shocks as evidenced by its
resilience to natural onslaughts. He stated the hope
and intention of the Consulting Board to determine
just how man's discharges into the fluctuating marine
environment affect that environment. He also stated
that the broad interest in the solutions provided by
this project may result in the recommendation that
it be continued beyond the three years now provided
by the Joint Powers Agreement.
-2-
Upon conclusion of the report of the Chairman of
the Consulting Board, a discussion and question and
answer period followed.
RE: PROGRESS
OF PROJECT
The Project Manager
reported on the progress
of the project to date.
He provided each of the Commissioner with a draft of
.Progress Report No. 6 for the period concluding
March 20, 1971, and discussed the contents thereof.
He also provided draft copies of the minutes of the
meeting of the Consulting Board on February 21 and
22, 1971, and two technical report drafts. The first
report was titled "General Surface and Sub-surface
Circulation and Characteristics of Water in the
Southern California Bight," by staff member James H.
Jones, Senior Environmental Specialist, and the
second was "Mercury in the Environment - A Summary
of Information Pertinent to the Distribution of
Mercury in the Southern California Bight," by staff
member David R. Young, Senior Environmental Specialist.
The Project Manager briefly reviewed the contents of
the reports and explained that these are the first
of a series of Phase I technical reports to be released
following review by the Consulting Board. He indicated
that Phase I is 68 percent completed and that Phase II
is in the planning .stage at present although some work
has begun, as described in the Progress Report. He
described cooperative programs with other agencies
which will probably increase in Phase II and stated
that plans for applications for Federal participation
in the program are moving forward, with the view
towards obtaining substantial outside funding for
Phase II. He assured the Conunission of the enthusi-
astic participation of the Consulting Board and the
staff in the work of the project and stated that each
participant believes that it is an exciting and unique
professional opportunity.
To comment further on the minutes, the special meeting was
called at the request of several commissioners who felt that at
the mid-point of the three year span alloted and budgeted by the
supporting agencies, it was time that we should have an interim
report from both the Consulting Board and Management. I believe
that the Commissioners should have a complete picture of the total
progress to date in order to project an evaluation of the potential
results of tne study at the completion of Phases 2 and 3.
It is apparent that we are participating in a worthwhile
project, and that while the time limitation may not produce all the
·information we would like to obtain, we will.have some important
conclusions concerning the effect of ocean discharge on the marine
ecology.
-3-
As a demonstration of the natural changes which take place
in the sea, Dr. Isaacs presented the Commission with three charts
prepared by the Scripps Institute of Oceanography. The first
chart, dated March, 1956, showed a tremendous area of warm ocean
water extending from the coast of Japan to the Aleutian Islands.
The second chart, dated February, 1957, showed that the mass of
warm water had moved, and now extended from the Aleutian Islands
to the California Coast. The third chart, dated November, 1957,
showed that the mass had moved into the Gulf of Alaska. The
differences in the natural ocean water temperatures and the warm
mass ranged to as high as six to eight degrees above normal.
Obviously, no amount of thermal pollution could ev~r equal the
massive natural change.
Dro Isaacs presented many other examples of natural phenomena
in the ocean environment which helped us place our coastal problem
in perspective.
It is a purely personal opinion, but I believe from observa-
tion of the study to date, that we will find that our normal o~ean
discharge does no ecological harm. It is conceivable that our
only real problem at the conclusion of the project will be to
develop more sophisticated methods for the extraction of chemical
and industrial wastes, and that perhaps these controls will have
to be imposed at the source.
I am also of the opinion that in initiating this study, we
have bought time; that government regulatory agencies have indicated
some willingness to hold up on imposing more stringent treatment
requirements until the final results of the study have been evaluated.
In conclusion, I would recommend that SCCWRPA should receive
our continuing support, and I would express the hope that at the
termination of our commitment, the project will be taken over and
funded by the Federal government.
Respectfully submitted,
LINDSLEY PARSONS, COMMISSIONER FOR
THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTSo
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER
RESEARCH PROJECT AUTHORITY
-4-
Agend a Item No. ~ 0
PROPOSAL TO
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORAl'\'GE COUNTY
BARTL E WELLS ASSOCIA TE S
Mw1icipal Financing Consultants
SERVICES
1. Investigation. We will review and analyz e all significant aspects of financing
the dis trict's trun..1c s ewer project. Our review and analysis will include: (a) a
review of available information relating to the district project , (b) examination
of the district's present and future financing capacity under its enabling act and
m e thods of operation, (c) consultation with tbe district staff, consul tan ts, and
others interested i n the project to develop a financial plan, (d) investigation of
fund s from state and federal sources to ass ist in the financing of the project, and
(e ) r e view of the district 's schedule of expenses and development of alternate
sources of r evenues to offset project costs .·
2. Preliminary Financing Report. We will prepare and submit to the district, in
l etter form , a preliminary report of findings based on the review described above .
The preliminary report wi.11 analyze alternat e procedures for financing the pro -·
posed proj ect and make recommendations based on the district 's needs and resources .
Method s for raising revenues required to pay project costs w ill be examined and
recommendations made .
3.-General Financ i n~ Report . Following submi ssion of the preliminary report,
after authorization to proceed , we will prepare and submit to th e district a general
financing report based upon the specific plan recommended by the staff. This re -
port will present a complete fina ncing plan s uitable for use by the I3oa rd of Dir e c -
tors in deciding d i s trict policy and as a basi s for electi ons as necessary.· Sources
of revenues required to pay project costs will be identified. Policy decisions of
th e board based upon the preliminary financing report will be incorporated and
reflected in t he gen eral. report. A report draft will be submitted t o the boa rd for
review and comments , after which at least 100 copies of the completed report will
be furnish ed the dis trict.
·4 . Summary R e port. Upon approval by the board of the g e neral financing report
and adoption of a speci fic financing plan, we will prepa re a short summary report
base d on th e adopted plan , making available at l east 200 copies for dis trict use .
5. Sale of Bonds. Upon authorizati on of bonds (or other financin g ) we will recom-
m end specific wrms and conditions for the bonds and assist the district in offering
its bonds for sale , in one sale. or in several series , through rece ipt of competitive
sealed bid s . Our services will include preparation and publication of an official
stat~ment fully describing the bonds and the ir securi ty and mailing this official
- 2 -
statement to not less than 500 bond dealers, investors, financial publications, and
bond rating services. We will provide additional information as required to the
bond rating agencies in order to secure the best possible rating for the bonds. We
will contact prospective bidders as appropriate, to provide information and stim-
ulate competitive bidding. We will also provide special news information to finan -
cial publications and will provide one advertisement in The Bond Buyer. On receipt
of sealed bids. for purchase of bonds we will analyze and compare the bids and re-
commend award. We will prepare a schedule of annual interest and principal re-
quirement~ for _district u_se, based on the actual interest rates bid by the success-
ful purchaser.
AVAILABILITY AND FEES
l. We will begin work for the district immediately upon acceptance of this propos-
al. We will be prepared to discuss our preliminary findings and to submit the pre-
liminary report to the board within 75 days after the acceptance of this agreement.
Actual timing of the submittal of reports ·will be subject to the control of the district.
2. We will be prepared to discuss the final financing plan and to submit copies of
the general report to the board within 30 days from the time the Board of Directors
adopts a specific plan. The completed general report will be available to the board
30 days after completion of the board's review of the report draft.
3. We will be available for consultation throughout the entire development period
for the project. We will be available at all reasonable times and on reasonable no-
tice for meetings of the Board C?f Directors and for consultations with the engineers,
staff, and public officials as necessary. We will be available to assist the district
in e}..'})laining the financing program to its electorate.
4. All of the professional work for the district Will _be performed by Bartle Wells
Associates, who will assume full responsibility for it. We will devote our time and
effort directly and intensively to the needs· of the di~trict at the time such work is
needed.
5 •. Our total fee for complete professional financing and bond marketing services
includes:
a. All expenses necessary for the performance of our services and all
overhead, including telephone and travel.
b. Printing and mailing of financial and summary reports and the first
official statement and statistical information and illustrations purchased
for use in such material.
- 3 -
~ The fee does not include legal or engineering services or any printing, publication,
special services, or expenses connected with such work or printing and mailing of
the second and subsequent official statements.
6. Our fee_s consist of initial progress payments which are payable as the work pro-
ceeds plus further payments based on the principal amount of bonds sold. Percent-
age fees apply to the total amow1t of bonds sold, whether in one sale or in several
series and are cumulative for each successive sale with a deduction of fees already
paid.
a. Payable as the work proceeds, an amount based upon our per diem rate
of $200 per day but not more than $2, 500 prior to submission of the pre-
liminary financing report.
b. Payable upon submission of the general financing report, an amount bas-
ed upon our per diem rate of $200 per day which, including payments un -
der (a) above, is not to exceed $4, 000.
c. Payable upon sale of bonds: $3, 500 plus 1/ 4 of one per cent of the first
$5, 000, 000 or less of bonds sold, plus 1/ 10 of one per cent of all over
$5,000,000.
The minimum fee payable in connection with any one sale of bonds is $7, 500.
7. We will provide such additional consulting services as requested by the district
for further specific investigations at our regular pe·r diem rate, payable as the work
proceeds.
8. We will riot require a formal contract of employment and will consider a letter
from an appropriate district official as sufficient authority to proceed. If the dis-
trict desires a formal contract, we shall be pleased to assist in incorporating the
terms of the proposal in such an agreement.
......,. •... 1
Jj 3 -
MAKE ELBOW BOOKS 1
~ Hemeon introduced -~ into duty -Culver asked i f it would be
agreeable to all directors, since election of Joint Chairman
and Vice Joint Chairman is coming up in the next couple of months,
to have these positions h eld by directors who are not District
Ch airman -this would give two mo re members on Ex ec utive Committee .
#4
t.--
-Griset elected
...--#5
#6
-Just elected
-Hy9e nominated -withdrew his name
Culver nominated -withdrew his name
Hyde then accep ted nomination and was e l ected
-Parsons elected
....__,.,#8 -Porter elected
~ -Miller elected /
/#10 -
yr::·-
Ship~ elected
R~K~XNXX~ Re soluti o ns of comm endation adopte~~~n~A~o
Bo b Finnell appointed Chairman of Committee -awards presentgd ~
for maint e a a nce and operators -see note s to Chairman
Cr i ttenb a ugh
Earle
Hitch cock
Curbvi lle
Davis
El ow
Ewers
Howe
1;parks
Ward
T .A . Dunn explained what is requ i red of e mployees to get operator and
~~~tenance cert i f i cates . Explained that t h ey must put in certain a mount V time before they can even take tests .
Clarke exp l ained that on opera.tor certificates they must put in o~e year
o f }feDf~fll~ servic e b e fore qualifying to take test for Grad e 4 , 1 2 year
Jre for grade 3, 2 more years for grade 2 and 2 more years for grade 1 .
Mr . Cu l ver then called an executive meeting for Tuesday, May 25 th at 5 :30
and invite d Clarke and Hemeon to at t end and to participate
-· ,
Rece i ve and file SCCWRPA report of Linasley Parsons f? ,
~ ~'J.. ,-\\ -\ _, 1/ v1 b"'j
#14 -Report of General Manager ~XX~XXf[:X.IXXN:fil& was hoping to
tell them fe deral grant on headworks had been received -had indication
that something was in the mail XMX~fi:XXi2§:MX~X informing us of same -
should be in the neighbrohood of $10 million -have heard nothing concrete
yet on t his . State board now wants to put their money i nto treatment
works not pipe line -have had indication from state board that money
is being s pread a.round -they feel that if Orange County get $1 0 million
we are doing pretty good . hA 1" t , , ""'~ ~ cl..-f 1v J"'~ ~ I ':. i. I')" cl. "' \-f'l-<. '°' ,.,(.U} 1 .... " t 1..4k
#15 -at last mee ting inquired as to p~escriptive rights re odor nuisance -'<I
Mr . Nisson feels that this is not poss ible -can not ge t prescriptive rights
to ma i ntain a. public nuisance -odor is a public nuisance -treatment
p l ant is no t public nuisance b ut manner i n ~"~hic h it is operated c an be .
1 1 6a _ Attorney be instructed to confer with the employees as discussed
in Executive Session
v FURTHER MOVED : That a position be established as administrative
assistant; and that t he staff be authorized to f ill t h e pos i tion
at the 4 .5 leve l ($979)
19a -(b) removed from consent cal endar -Finnell i n quired as to why this
is being denied -Nisson -Statute provides that whe n midding on a
public job, if sub -contractor is over 1. 5% of total pri~e , he mus t f.::J' )~be listed -statute provi des for substitution of a sub -c ont r actor
~ v() a t a. lat er dat e x~, but to add a subcontractor a t a later dat e ,
J' it mus t be a e me r gency . There i s no reasont to c lass ify t h i s as
CJ an fil&~f[ emergency . I f the contractor goes ahead and add sub -contractor
we shoul d assess him a $1 00 penalty -Move d and seconded to deny
request to add sub -contrac to r
38 -Not received back from Sege r strom as submitted -compensation based on
val ue of c r o p destroyed or not able t o b e p lanted as a ~f[~~.INXX result
of our use of l and
NISSON WANTS AUTHORITY TO SIGN THESE AGREEMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE DISTRICTS
SO AS NOT TO HOLD UP WORK WAITING FOR B~ MEETING -NO AC TI ON TAKE N
40 -Becaus e we failed on attempt t o get grant on Sunflower trunk, we a r e
go ing to have to sell some bonds soon s ince bond marke t is deter io rating. V We have to employ services of XX'.ID!:X municipal fina.Iilacing consuttants
Have p roposal of Bartle We lls for minimum of $7,500 -move d to accept
proposal of Bartl e Wells a n d authorize them to start work -approximate l y
$1 million wor t h of bonds
#50 -Report of general manager on Dist ri ct 's position s ince Ri vers i de
E.im:t:x:li p.1.iJ led-out of agreement with Dist r ict. Sta.ff has be e n working
with State Board representatives to feel out the ir pos i t i on on this .
When interim plan i s adopted we s h ould have a special meeting
of the Board to discuss Disttict 's pos ition .
"" #56 -We tried to get the right of ~ay from Edison Company . This procedure v;
comes i2§:ti under the public utili tie commission . We can not file law suit ft'/-~'·~~: ft ... ·'
until we go to that body . Edison s ys this is only corridor they have yL\' ",.,,;r~D
and s i nc e und e r g round utilities ar e b ein g s tre s sed fo r the future, they <f;r.,f·-~rl·
1;1 v must k eep these areas open for und e r ground utility installati on .
r
Nisson feels ·.tha.t Pub l ic Utility Commission wi l l uphold Edison 1 s position
n this . Sta.ff feels we should abandon attempt to get Edison right -!Bf -way
and CAN concurs i n staff 1 s recommendation .
Battin -has had some experience in this type of matter with Public
Utility Commission and also concurs in recommendation of staff and
General Counsel
CAN reported that the only way we could go into lawsuit on this type
of row is if PUC granted and stipulated an amount and Edison refused
the amount
Brown reported that Engineers are now studying alternate route up
Newland instead of proposed alternate to Edison row of Beach Boulevard .
/#58 -Manhole Coating litigation -we did not win lawsuit -the court ruled
·that the statute of limiations ran before our suit was filed.
The first defects detected in the summer -June or July of 1961. Contract Q..,_~ h ad 5 year guarantee -CAN instructed by Board to make formal ~~~XMMX
'-" demand on contractor and Amerco at at the end¢' o:f the five year period. <( Court rules that we had to file in 1965 . ~ . ~ ·J ~ert:i Point of contention here is whether statute runs at-1iliiid of 5 yea.rs
period or when contractor completed job
<:>'(\. Nisson fe e l s easiest wa y to app e al is through Jrn:REENXXXKX~M'.MJ~ Agreed
,,L~· Statement of Fa.ct on Statute of Limi/a.tions -cost on appeal would b e
\,15 '-(!1500 to $25 00 . Lawsuit a.t $78,ooo approx . Moved and second e d that the
~ui t b e app e al e d -motion passed
#3 -The Joint Chairman reviewed the recant amendment to the
rules and procedures for meetings concerning election of joint
chairman and vice joint chairman and announced that nominations
would be made at the regular June meeting . He pointed out that
chairmanship of EX a district was not a prerequisite to the holding
of office of joint chairman and vice joint chairman .
H J-'2
The General Manager reported on discussions ~n d enmy with t h e
s taff of the Regional Water Qualit y Control Board and the State
Water Resources Control Board in connect~o :r .w~t h ~o nstruc tion
tilt ~ti.. " nA-1 t ,_ .
of the Santa Ana Rive r Inter9eptor.~n XM':Qf~Jf ~ at temp ~o determine
I ~ ~"-) rfo
t he S tates position ~ this regional facility n o w that the Rivers i de
intere s ts ~withdrawn from . participation in the pro j ect . He
stated that the Board shoul~~ a special mee ting i n o og 1 'Qoo-to J;...,~
this matter after adoption of Galifornia R<@!0g-.~~~'"T"
GQU!r o 2 Bre4!1-d Interim Santa Ana River Basin Pl an by the Regional
Boa.rd in June . /," y (
-vvY-L tu
3 -17 ROW
The Gen e ral Co u nsel r epo rt ed on t h e outcome of discussions
with the Southern California Edison Company with regard to
utilization of their Barre -Ellis Traefr)nission Line Right-of -Way
i n connection wi th construction of the Knott Interceptor,
Contract No. 3 -17 and advis ed the Board that ~ Edison Comp any
had denied the District 's r equ es t t o u se said right o f way .
"{~He pointed out that the District coul d pursue the mat t er
with the Public Utilities Co mmissi on but that he was of the opinion
thafEdison C~mpany 's position would b e upheld inasmuch as the Barre -
Ellis Right-of-Way appears to be the only corridor open for future
i ns tallation of underground power utilities . Mr . Nissan concluded
that he c oncurred with the staff that the Districts should abandon their
~ kv-'U.L
attempt to obtain-saiAArigh t of way .
Di rector Battin commented on his experience with the Pub lic
Utilities Commiss i on in matters of this nature and concurred with
the r ecomme ndation o f the General Cou nsel and staff.
XXXM~X~~XXlrn:X~~~~~xxx~~~K~~Kiill:X~X XX ID§JCE~~~MXXNXX XXlrn:X~X KXXX~X
KXMN~X~~KKXMX~XXXX~~~~x~x~~MXX~~X~X X X.KM:X~~xx x x~x~~M~~X~X¥XXXXXXXXX
The staff then briefly r eviewed the routing of t he interce p tor
and reported that the District engine e rs we r e studying possible
alternate alignments .
~
,.... It .,~~€ne:...t:a"'1=w:m·senS:u s-0 Ct¥ie:z;:;gea nr , It was 11.moved, Ji"'l
seconded and duly carried: That the EXHXXXHXXHXUH~Xj!lll!l!XHXH ~ ~
XXX~X~XX~XX~MXX~~XMXXXlrn:XKMMXX XX ~X~XM~X~~X XXE~~ER letter from · ~v~ tL ~ µ.._ (,J.-._.-" L..~.r-~'l,<A~, .,-·
Southern Ca lifornia Edison Comp any ~dated April 27, 1 9 71 ,~be received
and ordered fil ~
-PBRTMER MOVED+-i hat the Districts explore the possible alternate
al ignments for the Knott Intercepto r , Co ntract No . 3 -17 .
I
l . I
I
Ii
f!OARDS OF DI RECT ORS
County San itati o n D istr icts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
May 1 2, 1971 -7 :30 p .m.
(1) Pledge o f Allegiance and Invocation
( 2) Roll Call
I'. 0. Box 5175
10844 Ell is Avenue
Fo untain Valley, Cal if., 92708
AGENDA
~ ADJOURN MENTS ...•. ~
COM P & MILEAGL .. ~
FILES SET UP .....•. ······-
RESOLUTIONS CERTl:(.·-
~El:~::S :R~~:N :: .. ?-
MINUTES FILED .•• ~
l / . ~ Consideration of motion to receive and fi l e minute ~ e xc erpts from the various cities regarding e le ctions
"./ of mayors and appoi ntments of alte r nates , and seating
new members of the Boards
DISTRICT 1
Annual e l ection of Chairma..D o f the Board
DISTRICT 2
Annual election of Chainnan of the Board
DI STRICT 3
Annual election of Chairman of the Boar d
DISTRICT 5
Annual election of Chairman of the Board
DI STRICT 6
Annual election of Chairman of the Board
DIST RIC T 7
-A.ii.nua l election of Chai r man of t he Board
DISTRICT 11
Annual election of Chairman of the Board
v (11) Appointmen t of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary~\\
(12 ) EACH DISTRICT
Cons i de r ation of moti o ns approving minutes of t he
following meet ings , as ma iled :
-Dis t rict 1 -April 14, 1 971 regular ""\\ .....-District 2 April 14 , 1971 r egul a r 1V\, s
Apr i l 19 , 1971 adjourned regular
_..District 3 -Apri l 1 4 , 1971 regular l'y\ \c;.
......-District 5 -April 14· 1971 r egular /'{\ \.s ' ,_,.,D i strict 6 -April 1 4, 1971 regular M\5
V""'D i strict 7 -April 1 4-, 1971 r egular M\)
~D i strict 1 1-April 1 L1., 1971 regul a r M\~
ALL DIST RICTS
Heport of the J"oint Chairman
ALL DISTRICTS
. Report of the General Manage r
ALL DI STRI CTS
Repo1~t of the General Counsel
7
/(16)
/@
(17)
I
(1 8)
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to
C,.Q nSi<\er~~ersonnel ma tte rs
~/l ·-lP '-1
convene in executive sess ion to
cc -.oo ~ ~-, 3 6
ALL DIST RI CTS
Report o f t he Executive Committee and consideration o f
motion to receive a.nd file the · Committee 1 s wri t t en r eport
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration o f act ion on items re commended by t h e
Executive Committ ee :
(a.) Considerat ion of motion to receive and fil e
lette r f r om Or ange County Water Dist r ict
dated April 19 , 1971, request ing a contrac tual
arrangeme nt with the Districts for use o f
secondary treat ed effluent, and dischar ge to
District s 1 fac ilitie s ; and directing the staff
to meet with r epres entatives of the Wate r
District t o obtain mo re de tailed information
concerning t he i r propo sal , i ncluding the effect
on the Districts ' p r e sent and future discharge
requiremen ts as es tablished by t he r egulatory
agencies
(b)
~M \S
Con sideration of motion accepting proposal of
Osborne Laboratories, Inc ., dat ed April 20 , 1971 ,
for conducting in-process p ip e testing for the \'\ .\.~ i./
period May 1, 1971 through June 30 , 1972, as ~--
r ecommended by the staff '
(19 ) ALL DISTRICTS
* * * * * * * * *
CONSE NT CALENDAR
.All matters placed upon the consent calendar are
considered as not r e quiring discuss i on or further
explanation and unless any particu lar item is
requested to be removed from t h e consent calendar
by a Director, staff mem ber, or member of the public
in attendance , t here will be no separate discussion
of these items . All items on the consent calendar
will be enacted by one a ction app r oving a l l motions ,
and casting a unani mous b allot for r eso l utions
i ncluded on the consent calendar . Al l items r emoved
from the consent calendar shall b e considered separat ely
in the r egular o r de r of business . ·
Members of the public who wish to remove an item f rom
the cons ent calendar shall, upon re cogn1.tion by the
chair, state their name , address a nd designat e by
l etter the item t o be removed-from the consent calendar .
* * * * * * * * *
Chairman will d e t ermine if any items are to be deleted
from the consent calendar .
Conside ration of ac tion to approve all agenda items
appearing on the consent calendar not spec ific ally ·
r emoved from same.
-2 -
(a) Consideration of motion ~o receive and file bid
tabulati on and recommendation, and awarding purchase
I of one Secti onal Sewer Rod ding Machine , Specificati on ~ .,/
No . E -057, to Southwest Flexible Company , in the·
amount of $6 ,524 .49 . See page 11 D11
/
Consideration of mo tion to receive and f i le lette r
dat ed Ap r i l 5 , 1971 fr om J: Putnam Henck, Contractor ,
~and deny request to add Standar d Me tals to the
~ list of subcontractor s, Sedimentati on Basin 11 K11 and
\:.fa Digester "K" at Plant No . 2 , Job No . P2 -17, in ·
I accordance with the provi sion of Section 4109 of the
!\ Go ve r nment Code , as r ecommended by the General Counsel .
See page "E"
\, A · (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 71-54 , app r oving plans ~IJ.,~
~ "~· ~ and speci·fication s for Pump S tation and Add i tions '\\' ... ~ ~ .. to Bypas s Facilities at Plant No . 1, Job No . I -7 -3_, ~--v
/
'fJ·. ~~·~and aut horizing advertising for bids-to b e op ened
i/June 1 5, 1971 at 11 :00 a .m. See page 11 F 11
-
(19a ) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted f r om consent calendar ,
if any (b )
(20) ALL DISTRICTS
\
Consideration of motion to r ecei ve and file certification
/\h S of the General Manage r that he has checked all bills
L'\ appearing on the agenda , found them to be in order , and
!:/' . that he r ecomme nd s authorization f o r payment ,
(21)
~~\\
v G 't\\
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of ·roll cal l vote motion approving Joint
Opera.ting , Ca.pi tal Out l ay Revolving and Cons t ruct i on
Inspec tion Revolving Fund warrant books for signature
of the Chairman of District No . 1, and authoriz ing
payment of claims listed on page 11 A11
1v1 Is
(22 )/ALL )?fSTR ICT9/ / /" /
/ .:.: Q.t'her busille ss and,A'.!omrnunio-a;tions !'<'if any
(23)
(24)
l/
( 2 5")
/
J (26 )
(27 )
D ~TR I CT l~
Considera ion of m)Ofun appr9~g war~ts , j--~Y S ee page 11 B11 ( . ( 7~ ~··· _,,..
DISTRICTS 1 & 7
Consideration of mot i on approvingMslsSpense
· f s 11 c 11 i any . ee page ___ _
fund warrants ,
DISTRICT 1
Con sideration of motion t o ad journ ~~ '-f 5 \, f\'l,
DISTRICT 5 . I
Conside ration of motion to rec e ive and file l e tter /\If ~
from Th e Irv i ne Comp any , da ted .Ap ril 1 2 , 1 971, r e qu es ting ·
adju s t me nt of District 's b ound a r ie s t o facil i tate propose d
Annexa tion .No . 5 a nd Exclu s ion No . 3 . See pcige 11 G11
-3 -.
(28) DISTRICT 5 ~.,.,:J~._,/ Consideration of Reso l ution No . 71 -55 -5, a utho rizing -~~
initation of proceedings to annex territory to the N\ n
District (Annexation No. 5 -Spyglass Hill Annexation),· ~
subject to f i nal verification by District 's Engineer
of specified boundaries . See page "H"
( 29) DIS TRI CT 5
Considerat ion of Resolution No . 71-56 -5, authorizing
i nitati ori of p r oc ee dings to detac h territory from
t h e Di s t rict (Exclusion No . 3), subject to final
(30)
ve r ifi cation by District 's Engineer of specified "S l/. I LI n.,.... A•.
boundaries . See page "I '' OI · 7 '""-"''-"~
DISTRICT 5
1 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any . ~A S
See page "B" r vi
( 3':1J D);§TR I C'1:. 5 ''\,_ \~, ~ Ot~r bi){;in~ss ~ co~n i~ion~ if \a~y
. .A32 ) DISTRICT 5
V ' Cons i deration of motion to adjourn q '.~lo f, YY). ·
(33 )
(.34)
v (35)
(36)
(37 )
DISTR T 6 · ~ \.
Cons id ratiorl of motio a.pprovi~ wa.rr~s, '\_f an\y .
See pag "~~'-'
DIST~CT 6 "\,_ '\ . Other~usiness~1d commu~catio~, i~ an\
DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn
DISTRICT 7
Considera tion of motion approving Change Ord er No . 3,
to the plans a.nd specifications for Sunflower M
Interceptor, Rea.ch 1, Cont ract No . 7 -6 -1, authorizing
tunneling under Harbor Boulevard in lieu of an open-cut,
a.t no additional co st to the District . See page "J " ----
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion approving Change. Order No . 1, 1111 r '-'
to the plans and specifications for Sunflower f v 1 I ~
Interceptor, Reach 2 , Contract No . 7 -6 -2, incorporating
Federal contract requirements into the specifications .
See page "K"
DI STRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No . 7 1 -57 -7, authorizing
execution of a temporary working lice nse with C. J .
Sege~strom and Sons, irt connection with construction
of Sunflower Inte rc e ptor, Reach 1, Contract No .
7 -6 -1 , for an amount to be determined by value of the
crop damage d , a.s r ecommend ed by the Gene ral Counsel.
See page "L " 4 r ~ 6"'
1
-4-
( 39 ) DI S TRI CT 7
Co n s i de ratio n of motion approving warrant s , if any . /\/\1 c__ v See page "c "
1
•
1
--:;; ~DIS T RIC T 7 ~~O t he r business and c ommunic ati o n s , if any
( 4 1) v
( 4 2)
( 43)
~44)
( 45)
~4 6 )
( 47)
( 48)
DI STR I CT 7 C~~
. :3,.D Con s ide ration o f motion t o adj ourn /"'1~\ 5:
DI ST RICT 11 U 1 5 {'"
Conside ration of mo t i on t o r e c e ive a n d ·file lette r I '
f rom Ci t y o f Huntingto n Be a ch dated Ap r il 8 , 1971,
requesting change i n d ate of commencement of annual ca.p i tal
c ost r epl acement char ge provi de d f or in Agreement dated
J anuary 13, 1 97 1, r e Su n set Beac h d ischarge ; and ,
con s ide ration of Re sol ut i on No . 7 1 -58 -11 , approving
and autho r izing e xecuti on o f amendm ent t o said
a g r eeme nt authori z ing r e vision o f t he annual c ap i tal
c o st paymen t provi s i o n . See pages· 11 M11 and 11 N11
DISTRI CTS 3 & 11
Conside r ati on of mo~ion appro ving suspense fund
wa rr an t s , i f any . See page 11B11
D TRICT 1 1 \. ~i (' -
Ot r b u s i ne~nd c o mm ~~ations'l i f ~Y
DIS TR I CT 11
Co n side r a tion of mo t i o n t o adj ou rn
DI STRICT 2
Co n side r ation of mot i on declari ng Publ i c Hearing open
on the District 's 11 Interim Five Year Master Plan
of Waste Wate r Facilities , Co u nty Sanitati on Dist r i c·t
No . 2 11 , .d ated Ma r ch , 197 1, prepared by Lowry and Associates
(a )
. V"'
(b )
(c )
i/ (d)
DI STRI CT
Se c retar y rep o r ts on pub l i cation of No tice
of Hearing i n manner p r ovided by law, (Anaheim
Bulletin, Ap ril 29 , 30 , May 1, 3, and 4)
Sec r etary rep ort s on writ ten objecti ons f i led
with h i m p rior to the he ari ng
C~airman h ear ~ obj ect i 0ps, i f any , from ~rson\
pr ~ent at he a ~ng \._,_ '-
Cons i derati o n of motion to close p ublic h e ari ng 1'11·/ s
on ·above s u bject r epo r t
2
Considerati on of motion to take 11 Interim F ive Year Master
·Pl an of Wast e Wat e r Faciliti es , County Sanitation District
No . 2 " unde r advisement p e nding completion of Master Plan
Report, afte r d e termination of Federal and State financing
participation in the Santa Ana River Interc eptor and Carbon
Can yon Int e rc ep tor
-5-
l '
(49)
~
B
V('51 )
(52)
(53)
(54)
DISTRICT 2 \
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. M S
See page 11 B11
DISTRICT 2
Other bus i ness and commun i cations , ·if any
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adj~urn ~ ~ ~ 1 ~· '{Y'I.
DISTRICT 3
Cons i deration of mot i on app r oving· Change Order No. 5 to f\/\\ S
the plans and specifications for Westside Intercepto r 1 ~1
F acilities, Los Alaraitos Pwnping Station, Contract No . 3-12,
authorizing an addition of $1,871 .51, and granting a
68 calendar day extension of time to the contract with
Me r co Const r uction Engineers, Inc . See page 11 0 11 -----
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of Resol ution No . 71-59 -3, accepting
Westside I nterceptor Facilities , Los Alamitos Pwnping
Station, Contract No . 3-1 2, as complete ; and authorizing
execution of a Notice of Co mpletion . See page 11 P 11
DI STRICT 3
(a )
(b)
Considerati on of mot i on to reject bid of
Robert G. Castongia, Inc . on Beach Re l ief
Trunk Sewer, Contract No . 3 -16, from con sideration
because of irregularities, as recommended by
General Counsel ; and ,
Consideration of Resolution No . 71 -60 -3 ; to receive
and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and
awarding contract for Beach Reli e f Trunk Sewer ,
Reaches 17, 18 and 19 , from Rostrata Avenue to
Rosecrans Avenue , Contract No . 3-16 to Merco
Construction Engineers , Inc . in the amount of
$453 ,122.15. See pages "Q" and 11 R11
(SS) DISTRICT 3
Conside ration of Resolution No . 71-61 -3, authori zing
execution of Pipe Line Licen s e with The Atchison, Topeka \
a.nd Santa Fe_ Railw a y Company relative to construction ti\· S
. of Beach Relie f Trunk Sewer , Reaches 17 , 18 and 19 , ~
from Rostrata Avenue to Rosecrans Avenue , Contr2,ct ' ~
No . 3-16 ; and authorizing payment of $150.00 for said
li cense . See page 11 s 11
~ DI STRICT 3 ~ Report of General Counsel and staff on acquisition of
right -of -way, Knott Interceptor , Contract No. 3-17.
See page .11T 11
( 57) DISTRICT 3 .
Consideration of Resolution No. 71-62-3., .approvi ng and l
authorizing execution of agreement with Orange County /Y) 12_
.Flood Control District providing (for said District to ....J
construct a portion of the Knott Int e rceptor, Contract ~-~, V
No . 3 -17, in conne ction with t he ir i mprovement of the ~
Talbert · Channel. Se.e p a ge 11 u 11 -----
DISTRICT 3
Re p o rt o f Ge n e ral Coun s e l on sta tus of manhole coating
litigation
-6 -
( 59) DI STRICT 3 . «;~'~
Co n side ration of Resolution No . 71 -63-3, approving plans ~
and specificati o n s for Conversion of Westside Pump Station ~~\~
to Lift Station, Project No. 30008; and au t ho riz ing
advertising for bids on a date and time to be determined
by the General Manage r . See page "v " · /
(60) DISTRICT 3
Conside ration of motion to re ceive and file bid tabulation
and recommendation and awarding purchase o f P iping f o r \
Westside Pump Conversion , Project No . 30008-A-l to . N\ S
Keenan Pipe & Supply Co ., in the amount of $6 ,846.82 .
See page "w"
(61) . DISTRI CT 3 \
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. M S
See page 11 B 11
(62 ) \pIST~T 3"' "-. '\ \ \ 'Q ther busin~s an'ti-commun b t\Qp ~'t.. if any
(63) DI STRICT 3 fl
Conside ration of motion to adjourn \ 0 ~ O' l f fl("'
-7 -
C. ~-irt hur Ni ss on
Mi l l er , Ni s sen & Kogl e r
201 4 Nor th Broadway
Santa. ~i.na., California
Ma y 3 , 1 9 71
Sub ject: May 1 2th Bo a r d Me e ting Age nda I tems
Th e f ollowing agreements will be c ons i de re d for app r oval
b y t he Di st ric t No . 3 Board a t thei r regular meet ing on
May 1 2th :
.1greem ent No . c607 Orange County Flood
Con t rol District , Contract No . 3-17
Pi pe Li ne License At c h ison ·r op_eka and
Santa F e Ha ilway Company ,, Co ntract No . 3 -16
Pl ea se a dvi se i f t hese d ocument s a re n ot i n o r der f or
submi ssi on to t he Board .
J WS :g c
Enc lo s ure s
J . Wayne Sylvest e r
S e creta r y of t h e Boa rd
of Di r e c t or s
M-E-M-0 -R-A-N-D-U-M
TO _ __..F_I=L=E..._----=M=A=Y_B=O=A=RD:..:;;...~M-==E=E=T;.;:;I;,;;;N:.;;G __ DATE Ma.y 4 , 197 1
FR O M_---'J..,_.'--W_A_Y_N...;;;E_SY_L~VE~S.;..;T;;.,;;E;;;.;;R ____ s uBJECT AGENDA I TEMS
Have received several calls from CAN today concerning the following:
1. Compensatory time payment to the estate of Norman R.
Tremblay
Art has r eviewed and reconsidered this mat t er and now
advises that he is of the opinion that we can not make
any payment of overtime to Norm 's family . He is going
to recommend that the Boards rescind action taken at
the April 14th meeting to that effect.
2 . Re quest of J . Putnam Henck to a.dd subcontractor on
contra.ct No . P2 -17.
Art advis es to deny Henck's request and assess him
$100 after Henck goes ahead and adds the sub contrac tor
anyway . Henck must rec eive a. notice a.t least '-five days
prior to Ma.y 12th informing him that a hearing will be
he l d on that date at the Joint Board meeting to cons ider
his r e quest .
3. Westside Conversion
Art r ecommends that we call for bids for the conversion
and then r e j ect all bids if the Districts can perform
the work for less . He advises that we ma.y purchase
the piping and state that the Districts will supply
same for the job . This will delay the project until
the June Boa.rd me eting unless a special meeting or sp e cial
committee can take action .
4 . Easement -Contract No . 7 -6 -1
Art is working on this and advises that it will be
in the form of a temporary working licens e agreement .
He has come up with a new twist a n d is attempting to
work out a formula. to ·pay for crop damage after the
value of the crop has been determined when it is
harve s te -:L
LATE FLASH ! !
Art now advises that he ha.s reconsidered is reconsideration
on payment of compensatory t i me and will now rec omme n d p ayment
of the 5 3 accrued hou r s prior to 1963 .
ALL DISTRICTS
Repor_t of the
sp ecial sub -
commj_ t tee of
the Executive
Comm :L ttee
duly carried :
EXCERPTED FROM MI NUTES OF JOINT
BO ARD MEE TING -OCTOB ER 1 4, 1 970
Direc tor Parsons reported on the
activities of the special sub -commj_ttee
of.the Executive Committee relative
to d issemination of information to
the public on the Dj_stricts ' activities .
Following a lengthy discu s sion of the
Board it was moved, seconded and
That the report of the sub-committee be rece ived and ordered
fil ed and that tl)e temporary employinen t of Mr . Michae l
McF adden to assist in preparing information concerning
the Districts' activities be authorized, for an a mo unt not
to exceed $600 per month.
ivieeting uate ::.>/I .d / 7 /
DISTPJCT l
Gris et
Miller
Porter
Battin
V: Herrin
17 L Coco v ;a;v
DISTRICT 2
.. ~H arper
Christi e ..,/ Root
'"'lar k ,3/ Magnus
'°-61lve r ~-·
S~ephenson · · Dutton
Jus t
F innell =s::-· Gomez
Herrin · . Griset
S i ms '· Zuniga
Smith Z-.Z Hileman
Wedaa "3i Machado
Wi nn ~ Schniepp
.Battin ~
Cu lver
DISTRICT 3~
Hemeon Lewis
~~ Hogard
Berton Westra
Christie Root
Cl ark Magnus
Davis Bousman
Stephenson Dutton
Green McCracken
Harvey ~ Kanel
Herrin Gris et
Hyde Kroes en
Just 1 / Harper
lvlcWh i nney ~
ims ~Zuniga
Battin ~ ·
DISTRICT 5
Parsons
Hirth
Battin
DISTRI CT 6
Croul
Porter L
~~Hirth
Battin -'J,L-
DISTRI CTd
Mill e r ~ Coco
Griset ~ He rrin
Porter ~
Roge::es _?" v Hirth
Smith ~ / Hil eman
Battin =z
TJISTRI CT 11
Coen _ dhiple y tr/Mc Cracken
Battin
8
Goldbe.rg
Batt.
Time __ ],_',_, ..... ~......,...o~---Dist ric t __ a-'--'-1 L-1 __ _
J OI NT BOARDS
Culver ~ Q v--b ,-J.o
Hemeon (;? ~-¥9=
~ ,Z Hogard
Berton 'O < We s tra
Christie # Root
Clark Mag nus
Davis Bousman
Stephenson . Dutton
Finnell L7 < Gomez
Coen ;:/
Green C?' McCracke:
Griset ~ Herrin
Harvey ---v7 Kanel
Herrin C7 Griset
Hirth 1 // Croul
Hyde ~ Kroesen
Just ~ Harper
~~~~ v-Hirth
McWhinney ~-
Miller Coco
Parsons
Porter ~
&7-ge:eg v Hirth
Shipley :::?a---r1c Crackei
Sims 17 Zuniga
Smith 1../ Hileman
Wedaa ·£Machado
Winn · Schni e p ~
Bat t in
~~~d~-,
OTHERS
Harpe r-1./
Brown ___.L
Sy lvester v
Lewis ~
Carlson
Cl a r ke -1.-/--
Du nn V
Finster ---Galloway
Hohene r
Hunt
Keith
Lo wry
Maddox
Martinson L
Niss on
Piersall
---Sigl e r
St evens
Crabb
~~h1 ~ae::V7
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUM.ENTS
May 12, 1971 -7:30 p.m.
WARRANT NO.
154.23
15424
15425
15426
~.5427 f
J-5428
15429
15430
15431
15432
15433
15556
19~34
15435
15436
15437
15438
15439
15440
15441
15557
15442
15~43
15444
15445
15446
15447
15448
15h49
5450
~5451
15452
15453
15558
15454-
15455
15456
15457
15458
15459
15460
15461
15559
15560
15462
15463
15464
15465
15466
15467
15468
15469
15561
15470
"'5562
~5471
15472
15473
15474
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR. OF
A~B & B Supply, Electrical Supplies $
Adept Mfg. Inc., Pump Parts · .
All Bearing Service, Ir.c., Bearings
Allied Bolt & Supply Co., Small Hardware
Allis-Chal~ers Controls Div., Pump Controls
City of Anaheim, Power
Anaheim Truck & Transfer Co., Freight
The Anchor Packing Co., Pump Parts
Apco Supply, Filters
Atlas GalvaDizing Co., Boiler Repair
Azusa Weste~n Inc., Concrete
Gerry Baldwin, CWPCA Conf. Expense
Bank of America, Bond & Coupon Collection
Beacon Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
James Benzie, Reimburse OJT Instructor
Business Publishers, Inc., Technical Journal
CCM: General Biological, Inc., Lab Supplies
C & R Reconditioning Co., Pump Parts & Repairs
Cadillac Plastic & Chemical Co., Small Hardware
C. P. ·Clare & Co., Electrical Supplies
Bill Clarke, CWPCA Conf. Expense
John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services
College Lumber Co., Inc., Bldg. Materials
Consolidated Electrical Dist., Electrical Supplies
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
Costa Mesa Cou~ty Water District, Water to Flush Lines·
Robert Currie, Reimburse OJT Instructor
Daniels Tire Service, Tire Repair
John M. Deck Co., Truck Parts
De Guel le & Soni s Glass Co., Truck Repair
Dixon Boiler Works, Inc., Boiler Rental
Dominguez Marine & Industrial Supply, Valves
Don's Schwinn Cyclery, Bicycles for Operations
Ted A. Dunn) CWPCA Conference Expense
E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc., Chemicals
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies
Electric Supplies Dist. Co., Electrical Supplies
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring
Fischer & Porter Co., Co!'ltrols
Fluid Handling Systems, Pump Parts
Fowler Equipment, Inc., Equipment Rental
William H. Fox, Employee Mileage
Ted Francis, CWPCA Conf. Expense
City 6f Fullerton, Raise Manholes
Garden Grove Lumber & Cement Co., Bldg. Supplies
General Electric Supply Co., Electrical Supplies
Genr:ral Telephone Co.
Georgia-Pacific Corp., Chlorine
Gladman & Walla~e, Truck Tires
Glidden-Dur~ee Co., Paint Supplies
Bob Gosche Co., Small Hardware
Graybar Electric Co., Inc., Electrical·Supplies
Tony Gutierrez, CWPCA Conf. Expense
· George T. Hall Co., Inc., Valve Parts & Controls
Fre~ A. Harper, Various Meeting & C.O.D. Expenses
Harron, Rickard & McCone Co., Equipment Rental
L. Heitman Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Rental
Howard Supply Co., P~pe & Valves·
City of Huntington Beach, Water
A-1
AMOUNT
12.68
1,000.00
106.91
219.34 3lt8.44.
. 12. 50
15.64
301. 30
60. 38
1+5. 82
340.23
52.00
248.21
1~8. 59
30.00
24.oo
'25. 50
350.00
6'"(. 79
32.06
i16.oo
1,121.93
161.88
1,573.77
495.93
65.24
15.00
81. 75
19.41
117.90
618.50
226.38
194.40
11+7. 50
1, 260. 00
107:13
4-03. 82
4,177.50
.83.1+2
371.91
76.50
3It.50
. 89. 98
150.CO
198.19
297.23
1,598.66
L~, 614. 93
277.74
llJ.2. 01~
150.81
1,644.91
106. 80
260.53
320.64
163.18
130.00
2,837.40
38.57
,.... . . '
WARRANT NO.
15475
15476
15477
15478
151.t.79
5480 .
~5481
15482
15483
15484
15485
15486
15487
15488
15489
15h9o
15491
15492
15493
15L~94
151+95
15496
15497
15498
15L~99
15500
15501
15502
15503
15504
5505
~5506
15507
15508
15509
15510
15511
15512
15513
15514
15515
15516
15517
15518
15519
15520
15521
15522
15523
15524
15525
15526
15527
15528
15529 .-,, 5530
~5531
151-~ 32
1553~
15534
15535
IN FAVOR OF
Huntington Beach Sign Co., Sign $
International Harvester Co., True~ Parts
Jasco Materials Co., Small H~rdware
Johnston P~~p Co., Pump Parts ·
Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pip~ Supplies
Fred Keiser, Employee Mileage
Kelly Pipe Co., Pipe & Valves
Keystone-Ingham Corp., Test Dye
King Bearing, Inc., Bearings & Vibrator
Kleen-Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies·
Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Hardware
LBWS, Inc., We lo.ing Supplies
L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Rental
Judy Lee, Employee Mileage
Kris Lindstrom, Employee Mileage
Chas. Lowe Co., Engine Parts
Marine Biological Consultants, Inc., Ecology Program
Milam's Electric Motor Service, Motor Repair
Moore Systems Division, Controls
B. Jean Mosher, Employee Mileage
Herber-t A. Moss, Special Labor Counsel
NCR Systemedia Division, Forms
Nashua Corp., Reproduction ·supplies
Nate's Saw & Lawnmower Shop, Saw Repair
National Chemsearch Corp., Chemicals
National Concrete Sawing, Inc., Core Drilling
City of Newport Beach, Water
C. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel Retainer
M. C. Nottingham Co., Lateral Repair
O. C. Suppliers, Inc., Couplings
ODA Nursery, Landscaping Plants
City of Orange, Water
Orange County Radiotelephone Service, Inc.
Pacific Clay Products, Pipe
Pacific Pumping Co., Freight & Pump
Pacific Scientific Co., Test Equipment
Pacific Telephone Co.
Parker Supply Co., Valves & Freight
John Phillips, Construction Inspection
Postm::.ster, Postage.
The Lee Potter Co., Inc., Maintenance Supplies
Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage
Public Utilities Commissicn, Technical Manuals
Reynolc:s J\1uminL1m Supply Co., Steel
REA Express, Freight
Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing
Santa Ana Book Store, Inc., Manual
Santa Ana Electro~ics Co., Electrical Supplies
Sargent-Helch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies
Scientific ·Proo."ucts, Lab Supplies
S. F. Serrahtino, Employee Mileage
The Sherwin-Williams Co., Paint Supplies
. Sidu Mfg. Co., Pipe Supplies
Signal Flash Co., Inc., Barricade Rental
Smith Optical Service, Safety Glasses & Frames
Sout11ern California Edison Co.
Southern California Gas Co.
South~rn California Water Co.
Spar~ 1 et t s , Bott 1 e d \Tater
Speed-E-Auto Parts, TrGck Parts
Standard O~l Co., Gasoline
A-2
AMOUNT
lt6. 83
62.96
27.09
1,260.00
250.94
36. 90·
2,979.32
75.08
.862. 90
122.31
220.13
467.46
1,502.73
25.38
32.34
981.75
5,762.07
i47.39
210.80
23.22
250.00
1~50. 52
105.00
9.40
228.11
165.00
1, 012. 21~
700.00
65.00
25.45
63.00
33.86
316.78
87 .1n
1,765.01
379. 81~
1~15: 15
476.77
549.65
450.00
124.89
45.78
4.73
250.05
11.17
11.87
11,50
46.16
584.11
60.48
80.58
571.67
69.63
172.36
107.82
12,558.96
1,289.30
6. 5'7
111.73
246.e4
966.33
, .•
WAR."RANT NO.
15536
15563
15537
r::5~8 ~---..J _t_5539
159~0
15541
15542
15543
·15544
15564
15545
15546
15565
15547
J.55l~8
15549
15550
15551
~5552.
15553
15554
15555
15556
15567
15568
1·5569
15570
15571
15572
15573
15574
15575
15576
15577
15578
15579
IH FAVOR OF
Surplus S·~~ le s, Dye r.:ar}:ers
J. Wayne Sylvester, Wash. D.C. meeting re Grants
& CWPCA Conference
Paul Torres, Employee Mileage
Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Steel
Union Oil Co.~ Gasoline
U.S. Equipment Co.: Inc., Compressor Parts
Utility Helicopters, Inc., Outfall Inspection
Vaniman Cnrr.e:ra, Lab & Photo Supplies
John R. Waples R.S., Odor Consultant
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc., Engine Parts
Robert A. Webber, CWPCA Conf. Expense
· Western Salt Co., Salt
Charles I. White
John Williams, Reimburse OJT Expense
Willig Equipment, Truck Parts
Wilson Engine & Equipment Co., Engine Parts
M. W. Wilson, Employee Mileage
Russ Wold, Employee Mileage
World Travel Bureau, Inc., Reimburse OJr Expense·
Worthingt~n Compressor, Pump Parts
Don Wright, Employee Mileage
Xerox Corp., Reproduction
George Yardley Co., Pump parts
TOTAL JOINT OPER/1TING
CAPIT.4L OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FlWOR OF
John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Serv. -Plant Const.
Carollo & Keith, Engr. I-8
William P. Ficker, A.I.1;q 1'1rchitect J-7-2/J-12
J. Putnam Benck, Contractor P2-17
J.E. Hoagland & W.W. Hoagland, Co~tractor P2-16
Hood Corp., Contractor Pl-15/P2-15
Peter Kiewit Sons' Co .. Contractor J-10
Lynar.1-Wood Construction, Contractor P2-18
Moore & Taber, Soil Tmrestigation J7-2/J-12
Near-Cal Corp., Contractor J-11
Tiernan's Office Equipment, Adding Machine
Twining La~oratcries, Testing P2-18
Wallace Trade Bindery Co., Plans & Specs. P2-19
F. T. Ziebarth, Contractor Pl-1R-l/P2-1R-l
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING .·~4
P.-3
<1' ~
$
$
AMOUNT
68.46
244.oo
12.30
56.40
6.35
l~26. 72
302.08
154. 2L~
332.40
231~. 70
102.00
27.72
33.18
335.68
133.10
165.06
41.94
80.3h
187.20
144.54
59. 3 1 ~
516.01
11.10. 06
71,885.51
17,840.88
8,865.00
.13 '524. 42
52,4oh.30
30,254.60
51, 84l~. 35
17_,896.00
5,613.22
1~85. 00
12,025.59
260.58
180.00
132.20
4,309.20
$ 215,635.34
vLllRRANT NO.
15580
15581 .._,.,
OCEAN OUTFALL #2
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION REVOLVING FUND
IN JPAVOR OF
Parker Diving Service, Inspection J-10
Parker Diving Service, Inspec~ion J-10
TOTAL INSPECTION REVOLVING ...
TOTAL JOINT WARRANTS
A-4
Al.10UNrr
3,270.45
10,934.71.
$ 13,934.71
$ 301, l~5 5 . 5 6
WARRfiNT NO •
15582
15583
15584
15585
15586
15587
15588
15589
;590 ..._.,
15591
15592
15593
1559'+
15595
15596
15597
15598
DISTRICT NO. 2
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Anaheim Bulletin, Public Hearing Notice $
Enterprise Printing Co., Plans & Specs. 2-14-1
AMOUNT
44.80
58.22
68,276.38 Lowry & Associates, Engr. 2-14 and Master Plan Rep~rt
DISTRICT NO. 3
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Cook & Barletta, Inc., Contractor 3-15
Robert N. Galloway, Manhole Suit·
Macauley & Manning, Man.."1-iole suit
C. Arthur Nisson, Legal Services, Manhole Suit
ACCUlvruLATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Anaheim Bulletin, Bid Notice 30008-A-l
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway, Pipeline
License 3-16· · ·
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 3-18
Merco Construction Engrs., Inc., Contractor 3-12
Wallace Trade Bindery Co., Plans & Specs. 3-16
West Orange Publishing Corp., Bid Notice 3-16
DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11
SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
$ 68,379.40
$ 4,872.12
55.00
96.75
500.00
$ 5,523.87
$ 8.68
150.00
2,093.00
32,869.36
105.00
49.68
$ 35,275.72
$ 40,799.59
Boyle Engineering,. Engineering Services, Survey and
Design 3-17 $ . 4,320.25
DISTRICT NO. 5
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Bayside Village, Easement Rent 5-18
Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Pipe Insp. 5-18
Zurn Engineers, Contractor 5-18
-B-
$ 3,000.00
715.25
62,093.40
$ 65.808.65
1
WARRANT no.
15599
15600
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
Boyle Engineering, Engineering·se~vice, Plan Check
and Inspection $ 555.00
CONSTRUCTION FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Engineering and Design 7-6-3
DISTRICTS NOS. 1 & 7
SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Engineering and Survey and
Design 1-12
Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Pipe Insp. 7-6-1
Sully Miller Contracting Co., Contr. 7-6-1
-C-
$ 15,723.00
$ -6,451.50
987.50
16,686.oo
$ 24,125.00
T -
B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N
Date: April 12, 1971
Contract For:
1.
2.
3.
ONE (1) SECTIONAL SEWER RODDING MACHINE
SPECIFICATION NO. E-057
BIDDER
Southwest Flexible Company
6029 Slauson Avenue .
Culver City, California
Flexible Pipe Tool Company
Po Oo Box 22022
Milwaukee, Oregon
San Rafael Equipment Co.
Po Oo Box 2957
San Rafael, California
BID
AMOUNT
$6,213.80
6,337.00
6,412.00
* * * * * * * * * * * *
PLUS 5%
SALES TAX
$310.69
316.85
320.60
TOTAL
BID
$6,524.49
6,653.85
6,732.60
It is recommended that award be made to Southwest Flexible Company,
6029 Slauson Avenue, Culver City, California, the lowest and best bidder.
Agenda Item #19(a) -D-
William N. Clarke
Maintenance Superintendent
All Districts
PHONE TURNER 2·1251
J. PUTNAM HENCK
A CORPOR4TION
GENERAL CONTRACTOR
374 WEST 40TH STREET • "p. o. eox 24'76
BAN BERNARDINO, CALIF". 92406
Orange Co·1ht_i/ S~r..i.i_:,.._tion
I03!_0+ BlU!:i ,';v~Jc
· 1'"0·13.te.i:i. 7:~110:", C!'.,J. U'·:ir ... i.·_·.:..
Subject: Subcontrrctors List
Gentl-::msn:
Tnis 1•2tter hereby udvL~es your Pgency thP.t our !asc. ~~:etds
Subcontre.ctor, StE:ndard :.:ctn ls, Wt;S ir:edvert~rntly l~ft off'
the list of S~b~cntrhctors 5Ub~ittdd to yo~r office with o~r
bid proposal.
Misco !.rett:l r~_briceticn, b~inb e S'J~>"!Cidty •:.:hich rt;qui.res
faciliti8s ~.nd peno~r:el not p!4cs.::ntly (rn;;lcyc-ec. by J. P.itna:rt
Henc'k, e cor?., m~~b:~s it de~; ireeble thnt this .,..ork b~ S;,ibcontrr;cted
to insure compete~t complifince ;dth -th:s rnase 'Jf the contruct
work. Yl'ur f.p· rovr~l cf' Stenasrd .:et!.ils ns the ~~isc, :L~tPls
Subcontrectcr is hereby solicited, for th~ above referenced
project.
Very Tr'Jly YJuts,
J. Putnam 3enck, a corp.
~') ~(_;-·~ ~\
' ~ '~-l-_> ~
111. L. Twist
Prcj ect Super int~ n<le nt
Agenda Item #lO(bl -E-All Districts
RESOLUTION NOo 71-54
APPROVING PL.A.NS AND SPECIFICATION FOR JOB NOo I-7-3
.A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOSo 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUMP STATION AND
ADDITIONS TO BYPASS FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB
NOo I-7-3
* * * * * * * * * * *
·The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and
contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors
by John Carollo Engineers, Districtsr engineers, for construction
of PUMP STATION AND ADDITIONS TO BYPASS FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1,
JOB NOo I-7-3, are hereby approved and adopted; and, .
Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to
advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the
Hea~th and Safety Code of the State of California; and,
Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m.,
June 15, 1971, at which time said bids will be publicly open~d and
read; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districtsr
Enginee~s be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of
Directors; and,
Section 5. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby
authorized to award contract for said Job No. I-7-3 on behalf of
these Boards of Dir~ctorso
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1971.
Agenda Item #19(c) -F-All Districts
...
Builders ofTomorrow's Citie.s ... Today
April 12, 1971
The Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District #5
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention Mr. Fred Harper, General :Manager
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to the condition of approval of tentative tract No. 7386
by the City of Newport Beach and previous discussions with your
honorable Board, The Irvine Company hereby requests adjustment of
the County Sanitation District #5 boundary without annexation fees.
This boundary adjustment would facilitate annexation of a certain
215. 80+ acres to and detachment of a certain 254. ll~+ acres from
Sanitation District #5.
In accordance with the District's procedure of annexation dated
September 10, 1970, ·the following documents and information are
submitted to facilitate the subject boundary adjustment:
A. 1. Six copies of Exhibit A of the general map indicating
attachment and detachment parcels in colors.
2.
3 .·
4.
s.
One copy of the tentative map of tract No. 7386.
One copy of the map showina anriexed boundary to
the City of Newport Beach RHarbor View Hill~
Annexation -Phase 3".
One sepia and one copy of map and ·1egal description
of the parcel consisting of 123.52+ acres in Blocks
97 and 98 of Irvine's subdivision to be annexed to
Sanitation District #5.
One sepia and one copy of map and legal description
of the parcel consisting of 92.28+ acres in Block 97
of Irvine's subdivision to be annexed to Sanitation
District ifa5.
6. One sepia and one copy of map and legal description
of the parcel consisting of 14.36+ acres in Block
91 of Irvine's subidivision to be detached from
Sanitation District #5. ·
The i;__·ine Company• 550 f\:'.?wpo~ Center Driv-:1 • New;Jor1 Beach. CaU'Jrn;a 9:2660 • {714) 'jJJ.301 t
Agenda Item ://27 G-1 District 5
. ,.1
;,,.
·/ /I Board of Directors
Orang~ County Sanitation District #5
P.age 2
·April. 12, 1971
/
7. One sepia and one copy of map and legal description
of the parcel consisting of 239.78+ acres in Blocks
56, 57, 91 and 92 or Irvine's sub id iv is ion to be
detached for Sanitation District #5.
B. Owners:
D.
E.
The·Irvine Company, 550 Newport Center Drive,
~ewport Beach, California 92660. Phone (714)
644-3011.. !1ajority land ownership.
Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, Mr.
William Watts, Property Management Department,
P. 0. Box 524, San Diego, California 92112.
Phone (714) 238-2127.
Assessed valuations:
123. 5 acres -$159, 965 )
92. 3 acres -$126, 535 ) @ • i,{.y>
14. 4 acres -$34, 508 ! ·.v ,..H>
239.8 acres -$613,197:. · '
1.(1 .
~/,(,tt7)
-~-
Annexation parcel consisting of 123.52 acres presently
within the Irvine Ranch Water District's Sewer
Improvement District ffl is anticipated to be detached
from IID~D Sewer District upon approval of this boundary
adjustment by Sanitation D~strict #5.
Certified check for $325.00.
We would appreciate it if your honorable Board will approve this
request at their next regular m~eting ..
-yery truly yours,
~. 2-----c'"' .. ~-""P__£;k.~-~
~Richard A. ~eese
Vice President, Planning Department
RAR/JP/pme
cc: Don Simpson -Shuirman Simpson
Joe Devlin -City of Newport Beach.
Ben Nolan -City of Newport Beach
Agenda. Item #27 G-2
Jerry Rewers -·Irvine
William Hurst -IID~D
William Watts -Pacific
Telephone & Telegraph
Distrj_ct 5
·~
RESOLUTION NO. 71-55-5
ANNEXATION NO. 5 -SPYGLASS HILL ANNEXATION
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING INITIATION
OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT
(ANNEXATION NO. 5 -SPYGLASS HILL ANNEXATION)
* * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
That an application for annexation of territory to itself
be made to the Local Agency Formation Commission as follows:
Section 1. That this proposal is ·made pursuant to Division
1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government
Code of the State of California; and,
Section 2. That this application is for the purpose of
adjusting the District's boundary by annexing 215.Sot acres of
real property to provide public sanitary sewer service to said
territory, as requested by the majority property ovmer;. 123. 53±
acres of which are presently within the boundaries of the Irvine
Ranch Water District Sewer Improvement District No. 1, and which
is anticipated will be detached from said District; a..YJ.d,
Section 3. That the territory to be annexed is uninhabited; and,
Section 4. That the designation assigned said annexation is
"Spyglass Hill Annexation -Annexation No. 5':, the boundaries of
which are more particularly described and delineated on Exhibit
11 A11 and Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by reference made a part
of this resolution; and,
Section 5. ~hat provisions for fees required to be paid as
a condition of the annexation must be satisfied.prior to completion
of annexation proceedings; and,
Section 6. That request is hereby made that such proceedings
as required by law be taken to complete. this annexation.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1971.
Agenda Item #28 -H-District 5
RESOLUTION NO. 7l-56-5
EXCLUSION NO. 3 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
• 5
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING INITATION
OF PROCEEDINGS TO DETACH TERRITORY FROM THE
DISTRICT (EXCLUSION NOo 3) ·
* * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5,
of Orange County, California
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
That an application for detachment of territory from itself
be made to the Local Agency Fonnat:ion. Commission as follows:
' Section 1. That this proposal is made pursuant to Division
1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government
Code of the State of California; and,
Section 2. That this application is for the purpose of
adjusting District's boundary by detaching i23.52± acres of
real property as requested by· the ma.j ori ty property mrner, sanitary
service to said area to be provided by others; and,
Section 3. That the territory to be detached is uninhabited;·.
and,
Section 4. That the designation assigned said detachment
is "Exclusion No. 3 ·from County Sani ta ti on District No. 5 11 , the
boundaries of which are more particularly described and delineated
on Exhibit 11 A11 and Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by reference
made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 5. ·That· request is hereby made that such proceedings
as required by law be taken to complete this detachment.
Jl Agenda Item 1t29 -I-District 5
COU~'Pl1Y SJ\fiI'Ti\TIOir DIS'fHICTS OF OH.f1NGE COtJUTY
P. 0. EOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE 0 HDER
C.O. NO. ___ ...___ ____ _
CONTRACTOR: Sully-Mi l_le£__Q_~_l]_ trac ti~o ··----DNI11~: May 12, ·12]1 __ _
JOB: Sunflower Interce~orL~ea~h 1, Contract No. 7-6-1
1\mourit of thls change order (ADD) (DEDUCT) d--0-'P ___ _
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the
contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price
are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Contractor's letter to the District dated April 8, 1971,
Boyle Engineering's letter to the District dated April
13, 1971, the District's letter to the contractor dated
April 16, 1971.
The contractor shall be allowed to tunnel under Harbor Blvd.
from a point 40 1 west of the centerline of Harbor Blvd. to
a· point 40' east of centerline. 126" Diameter, 5 gauge
tunnel liner plate shall be used and the work shall be in
accordance with the attached specification. This work is in
lieu of open cutting this intersection; In consideration
for the contractor incurring additional expenses in order to
minimize traffic inconvenience, the contractor shall be paid
for those bid items set forth in items of work numbers 9 and
10 as originally bid.
Original Contract Price $ 2,290,48LOO
Prev .. A uth. Changes C. O. #1&2 $ -0-
Board authorization date:
~May 12, 1971
BOYLE.ENGINEERING
This ,ChanBe (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ -o._-__ _
Amended Contract Price $_0_290' 481. 00
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California ·
By_____ /s/ P::lul_ G. B_r_o_1·1_n ___ _
Chief Engineer
SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY
By·
------~~~~----------------
Agenda. Item #36 ·-J-District 7
l-UUhTl ul\l'U.TffLLUn lJ.l.,:::>T..K..U,.,T0 Ul' UHJ\Ulit. L;UUl'd'l
P. 0. BOX 5175 -108h4 Ellis .Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHM-IGE ORDER
c.o. NO. 1
CONTRACTOR: Ernest E. Pestana, Inc. DATE: May 12, 1971
JOB: SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR, REACH 2, CbNTRACT NO. 7-6-2
Amourit of this change order (ADD)' (DEDUCT) $ none ----..
"-"" In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the
contract and/or cont~act work are hereby authorized and as compensation
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price
. "-""
are hereby approved. · '
The attached documents relating to Federal requirements are hereby
incorporated in the specifications: ·
1. LABOR STANDARDS, Contract Provisions, February 1969
2. ELil.fINATION OF SEGREGATED FACILITIES, May 13, 1968
3. CERTIFICATION OF NONSEGREGATED FACILITIES, May, 1968
The following statement will be incorporated inlo Section 9 of th~
Specificatio.ns:
"Bypassing of untreated or partially treated wastewaters
to surface waters or drainage courses will not be
permitted. All treatment processes will remain .in
continuous and full operation during construction. 11
Original Contract Price $1,278,238.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ __ n_o_n_"'e __
This Change {ADD) (DEDUCT) $ .none ----
Amended Contract Price $1,278,238.00
======~=====================~==========---========================:=.:====-· ~-=-====
Board authorization date:
May 12, 197"1
BOYLE ENGINEERING
By __ ---..---------------~~~-
Agenda Item #3'7 -K-
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By_· __ _j__s/ Pau]:_g_._Br_9._\_·m ________ .. _
Chief }:ng) nccr
ERNEST E. PESTANA, INC.
By~-----------------------------
District 7
RESOLUTION NO. 71-57-7
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A TEMPORARY
WORKIHG LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH C.J.
SEGERSTROM AND SONS ·
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, ·op ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF A TEMPORARY WORKING LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH
C. J. SEGERSTROM AND SONS
* * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the Chairman and the Secretary of County
Sanitation Dis,trict No. 7 be authorized and directed to accept and
sign that. certain Temporary Working· License Agreement from C. J.
Segerstrom and Sons dated , described on Exhibit "A" --------
attached hereto and made a. part of this resolution; and,
Section 2. That said license be accepted and approved by
the District upon the filing of a duly executed copy thereof in
the.office of the Secretary; and,
Section 3. That the Auditor of the District be authorized,
upon receipt of a demand signed by C. A. Nisson, General Counsel
of the District; to pay to C. J. Segerstrom and Sons an amount
to be determined by.value of the crop damaged.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1971.
Agenda Item #38 -L-District 7
! ol, r;;\ ··ro r--7 't·~·-v·~·~···=r·-i-)
' I .f i ), • ·, ' , ~ ~ .-4 v : ' ..L'-' __ ; ! ' ~ . ' ~ ·f . ) 11 1 ' ... _, ... ~.---~.h..~ of X-:1 untington n 1 veac11 '. .=:.!:~: _~:_ .. r·: ::_ ·: . .:...~ ·~ c/
:\~ !~ ·\---------------------------: 1. 0 ~ l / ·j P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 925~6
l \ 'A • \ ·~.
t.~ L----~;,;;:_,_;._ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California
'
Attention: Fred Harper
April 8, 19 71
Subject: Sunset Beach Sanitary District
Gentlemen:
Transmitted herewith is a check in the amount of $10,000 per
the conditions of agreement dated January 13, 1971 between the city
of Hnntington Beach ~nd Orange County Sanitation District.
It is recognized that the agreement also states that beginning
January 1971 that the City shall pay to the District an annual
capital cost replacement charge in the amount of 3% of $158,812.00,
to wit: the sum of $4,764.26. At the time this item was put in the
agreement it seemed certain the agreement would be executed prior
to the end of the year. However, due to the fact the agreement was
not executed until January 13, and that the actual connection was
not made until April 5, that this replacement charge commence
July 1, 1976. This date would also be in keeping with the payment
~chedule required in our agreement with Sunset Beach Sanitary Dis-
trict.
JRW:HEH:ae
Trans.
A d Itr::;m :l-r'42 gen a .... ,,
Very truly yours,
James R. Wheeler
Director of Public Works
'/~/// ~ /Lc,,..(/~~--0 '----/~-( . ~
H. E. Hartge
City Engineer
-M-District 11
RESOLUTION NO. 71-58-11
APPROVING AMENDMENT TO AGREEMEN'Ir WITH
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH RE SUNSET
BEACH DISCHARGE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NOo 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH RE SUNSET BEACH DISCHARGE
* * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Amendment to Agreement with
City of Huntington Beach, providing change in date of corrunencement
of annual capital cost replacement charge, is hereby approved and
accepted; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
District be authorized and directed to execute said amendment on
behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1971.
Agenda Item #42 -N-District 11
COUN'rY Sf1THTATIOH DISTRIC'i'S OF ORAI;GE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue
Fount~in Valley, California 92708
CHr'\NGE OHDER
C .0. NO • _ __.5 _________ _
CONTRACTOR: MERCO CONS~RUCTION ENGINEERS, INC..!__ DATE: May 12, 1971
Westside Interceptor Facilities,
JOB: Los Alamitos Pumping Station, Contrac~t ___ N~o ____ . ____ 3_-_1_2 ________ _
Amount of this change order (ADD) (~') $ 1,871._5_1__
..,,,,,, In accordance with contract provisions,· the following changes in the
contract and/or contract \'Jork are hereby authorized and as compensation
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price
are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Contractor's letters to the District dated January
21, and April l.S, 1971. The District's letters to
the qontractor dated January 25, and February 19,
1971. The District's instructions. to the contrac-
tor on April 15,and April 29, 1971.
Item I
The Contractor was instructed to apply a skin coat of Synkaloid
spackle to the walls in the pump room in order to smooth the
surface prior to p~inting.
Add
Item II
The Contractor was instructed to apply an additional coating
of clear masonry sealer to the outside of the building in
order to insure that the structure would be weatherproof.
Add
ttem III
~1 he Contractor was instructed to apply a prime coat of
paint to the walls of the pump room. rrhis "V-Jas not included
in the specifications.
$
Add . $
Item IV
The Contractor was instructed to provide crossed tees on the
bends in the bleeder lines Plus extra piping for ease of
cleaning these lines and to provide extra piping to raise
the hot water heater off the floor.
Add
Item V
The Contractor was instructed to sandblast and paint the
flared ells in the west wet well and the ends of the cast
irop spools in the east wet well with coal for epoxy to
provide corrosion protection.
Add
Item VI
The Contractor was instructed to prime and paint the
aluminum louvers on the outside of the structure to match
the masonry.
Add
Total Add
$
$
$
250.00
178.25
460.00
149.26
645.00
189.00
1,871.51
Agenda Item #52 0-1 District 3
COUNTY SANrrNrION DISTHrcrrs OF OHr'\NGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 5175 -l08l.1li Ellis .Avenue
Fountain Va~ley, California 92108
CHANGE ORDER Page 2 of 2
C.O, NO. 5 ... Continued .
CONTRACTOH: Merco Cons true ti on Englneers, Inc. DATE: Ma:y 12, 1971
Westside Interceptor Facilities
JOB: Los Alamitos Pumping Station, Contract No. 3-12
Amount of this change order (ADD) (E.KENZ~) $ ·1,871.51
In accordance with contract provisions, the following~hanges in the
contract and/or contract work are hereby authqrized and as compensation
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the ~ontract price
are hereby approved.
Continued •.....
The Contractor is hereby granted a time extension· of 68 days
due to late deliveries of pump motors. and 18" gate valves .. ·
SUMMARY:
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension From c. O.
II II rt ff
rr II II II
Revised Completiqn Date
-May 28, 1970
-210 Calendar Days
-December 24, 1970
#1 -33 Calendar Days
#3 -·29 Calendar Days·
#5 -68 Calend~r Days
-M~y 4, 1971
==::;=:=::::=:::=::::::: ---~ --·-·--·-----------· ----
Board authorization date:
'--rV!ay 12, · 1971
BOYLE ENGINEERING
$ 330,000.00
Prev. Au th. Chang·es Add-C. 0 .#1 $. 5, 681. 90
& 4. --
Original Contract Price
This Chan(Se (ADD) (~t\1~0°1\) $ __ 1_,_87_1_._5_1
Amended Contract Price $ 337,553.L~l
:.;.;.=;.;..~·--·--------===.:===::::.-=~-==
Approved:
COUN"'l1Y S/~NI'.l'NJ.1ION DISTRICTS of
Orange Cow1ty, California
By-------------~~----~~~~~~--By·
~~~~-------------~----~-----
!.1.r;enda Item #52 0-2 District 3·
RESOLUTION NOo 71-59::2
ACCEPTING CONTRACT FOR WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR
PACILITIES, LOS ALAMITOS PUMPING STATION,
CONTHACT NOo 3-12, AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISrrRICT NO o 3, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT FOR
WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR FACILITIES, LOS ALAMITOS
PUMPING STATION, CONTRACT NOo 3-12,, AS COMPLETE
* * * * * * * * * .
The Board of Directors of County Sapitation District No. 3,
of Orange County, California,
.DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ·ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Merco Construction Engineers,
Inc., has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of
the contract for the WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR FACILITIES, LOS ALAMITOS
PUMPING STATION, CONTRACT NOo 3-12, on the 4th day of May, 1971; and,
Section 2. That by letter, the District's Deputy Chief Engineer
has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in
accordance with the.terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred
in said engineer's recommendati0n, which said recommendation is hereby
received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That the WESTSIDE IN'rERCEPTOR FACILITIES, LOS
ALAMITOS PUMPING STATION, CONTRACT NOo 3-12, is hereby accepted as
completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor,
dated May 28, 1970; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby
authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work
therefor.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1971.
Agenda Item #53 -P-District 3
Engineer's Estimate:$5l7,990
B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N
Contract for: BEACH RELIEF TRUNK SEWER
Reaches 17, 18, and 19
CONTRACT NO. 3-16
1.
2.
3.
* 4.
5.
6.
(from Rostrata Ave. to Rosecrans Ave.)
Contractor
Merco Construction Engineers, Inc.
1704 Ruxton Lane
Redondo Beach,. California 90278
i
Colich Construction Co.·
8320 Isis Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90045
Falcon Construction Corp.
3014 Worthen Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90039
Robt. G. Castongia, Inc.
12323~ Woodruff Avenue
Downey, California 90241
Salata -Zurn
7891 Cerritos Avenue
Stanton, California 90680
Wal-Con Const. Co. & John M. Artukovich, A J.V.
14044 Ventura Blvd.
Sherman Oaks, California
7. Sully-Miller Contracting Co.
3000 E. South Street
Long Beach, California 90805
8. Steve Kral Corp.
P. O. Box 190
Baldwin Park, California 91706
9. Ban Bros. & A. S. Peich, J.V.
300 W. Palm Drive
Arcadia, California
10. Kordick & Son, Inc. (Joint Venture)
5062 N. Elton
Baldwin Park, California 91706
11. Scott Bros. Construction, Inc.
630 S. Hathaway
Santa Ana, California 92705
12. George Miller Construction Co.
3032 Bandini Blvd.
Los Angeles, California 90023
~3. Card Construction Company, Inc.
16642 Construction Way West
Santa Ana, California 92705
14. Charles L. Burch & Sons, Inc.
2419 N. Chico
El Monte, California
Date: May 10, 1971
Total Bid
$453,122.15
458,961.57
462,945.00
463,410 .l+o
466,910.00
476,622.00
517,080.00
519,545.00
534,724.89
537;226.80
539,059.50
575,304.15
579,247.00
643,707.00
-X·General Counsel recommends rejection from consideration
because of irregularities in bid.
Agenda Item #54b -Q-District 3
RESOLUTION NOo 71-60-3
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR BEACH RELIEF TRUNK SEWER,
REACHES 17, 18 AND 19, FROM ROSTRATA AVENUE TO
ROSECRANS AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 3-16
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NOo 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR BEACH RELIEF
TRUNK SEWER, REACHES 17, 18 AND 19, FROM ROSTRATA
AVENUE TO ROSECRANS AVENUE, CONTRACT NOo 3-16
,. *********
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section lo That the written recommendation this day
submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering, District's
engineers, and concurred in by the.District's Chief Engineer, that
award of contract be made to Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. ,
Contractor, for BEACH RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, REACHES 17, 18 AND 19,.
FROM ROSTRATA AVENUE TO ~OSECRANS AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 3-16, and
the bid tabulation and proposal for said work are hereby received
and ordered filed; and,
Sectibn 2. That said contract for Contract No. 3-16 be
awarded to Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. , Contractor, in
the total amount of $ 453, 122.15 in accordance with the
terms of its bid and the prices contained therein; and,
Section 3o That the Chairman and the Secretary of County
Sanitation District Noo 3 are hereby authorized and directed to
enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work
pursuant to.the specifications and contract documents therefor; and,
Section 4o That all other bids received for said work are
hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuc-
Gessful bidderso
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1971.
Agenda Item #54(b) -R-District 3
RESOLUTION NO. 71-61-3
AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE PIPE LINE LICENSE
AGREElvIBNT WITH THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SAN'I 1A
FE RAILWAY COMPANY
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF. DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOn 3, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF A PIPE LINE LICENSE AGREEMENT
WITH THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY
COMPANY
* * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District Noo 3,
of Orange County, California,
·· DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the Chairman and the Secretary of County
Sanitation District Noo 3 be authorized and directed to accept and
sign that certain Pipe Line License from The Atchison, Topeka and
Santa Fe Railway Company dated February 10, 1971, identified by
Engineer's Drawing No. L-3-31208; and,
Section 2o That the Secretary be authorized to forward said
license in duplicate to The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway
Company for execution and return; and,
Section 3o That said license be accepted and approved by the
District upon the filing of a duly executed copy thereof in the
office of the Secretary; and,
Section 4. Payment in the .amount of $150.00 to cover the
license fee is hereby authorized to be made to The Atchison, Topeka
and Santa Fe Railway Companyo
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1971.
Agenda Item #55 -S-District 3
P. W. RICHARDSON
DISTRICT MAN.I.GER
~· • # -
\. ____ /
Southern California Edison Company
P. O. BOX 111
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648
April 27, 1971
Mr. Ray E. Lewis, Deputy.Chief Engineer
County Sanitation Districts of Orange.County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92708 .
Subject: County Sanitation District #3 of Orange
County -Right of Way in Barre-Ellis
Transmission Line Right of Hay
Dear Mr. Lewis:
Acknowledging Mr. C. Arthur Nissan's letter of March 11
regarding the subject request for ri8hts of way in our Barre-
Ellis trans:11ission line, and also confiTIPing conversations
between yourself and J. R. Sheldon of this office, we would
like very much to a::x:>perate in granting the requested rizht
of way. P.owcver, due to our projected needs for future trans-
mission require.~ents and the necessity of fully utilizing
existing transmission ease..-:Lents, we respectfully deny your
.request.
As you will agree, with increasing demand being placed on
the need for future generation and transmission facilities,
it is iJTJperative tl--tat the existing rights of way be kept free
for the purpose of transi'.litting electric energy. It is
anticipated that the belcr..v ground use of our rights of way for
transmission of high voltages r..ay beco~€ tec..1-trtically and
economically feasible in the foreseeable future, in which case
the preservation of sub-surf ace rights will beco~e increasingly
vital in order to rr.eet growing demands not only in Orange
County but in neighboring areas.
It is sugeested that other routes be explored as possible
locations for your new installation.
Sincerely,
JRS:da
Agenda Item 1156 -T-District 3
RESOLUTION NO. 71-62-3
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN
AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
DISTRICT HE COI-.JS'I1RUCTION OF A PORTION OF
KNOTT' IN'rERCEPTOR, CONTRAcrr NO. 3-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, APPROVING
AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
WITH ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
RE CONSTRUCTION OF A PORTION OF KNOTT
INTERCEP'rOR, CONTRACT ·NO. 3-17
* * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Dlrectors of County Sanitation District No. 3,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Agreement No. c607 with Orange
County Flood Control District, providing for said District to
construct a. portion of the Knott Interceptor, Contract No. 3-17,
is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
District be authorized and directed to execute said amendment
on behalf of the District; and,
Section 3. That payment to Orange County Flood Control
Dis.trict be authorized, in accordance with payment provisions of
subject agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED a.t a regular meeting held May 12, 1971.
Agenda Item #57 -U-District 3
RESOLUTION NO. 71-63-3
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR CONVERSION OF WESTSIDE PUMP STATION
TO LIFT STATION, PROJEdT NO. 30008
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONVERSTION
OF WESTSIDE PUMP STATION TO LIFT STATION,
PROJECT NO. 30008
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section·l. That the detailed plans and specifications
and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors
by Pistrict's Engineers, for CONVERSION OF WESTSIDE PUMP STATION
TO LIFT STATION, PROJECT NO. 30008, are hereby appro~ed and
adopted; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed
to ·advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions
of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and,
Section 3. That said bids will be publicly opened and
read on a date and at a time to be determined by the General
Manager; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the
District's Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf
of the Board of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1971.
Agenda Item #59 -V-District 3
B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N
.Date: May 10, 1971
Contract For:
PIPING FOR WESTSIDE PUMP CONVERSION
PROJECT NO. 30008-A-l
BIDDER
1. Keena~ Pipe.& Supply Co.
1099 Baker Street
Costa Mesa, California
2. Howar.d Supply Company
13061 Safford Street
Garden Grove, California
3. Kelly Pipe Company
525 No. Mission Road
Los Angeles, California
4. Ho Jo Lorenz Company
Po Oo Box 2412
5.
Santa Ana, California
Lakewood Pipe & Supply
9060 E. Rosecrans Avenue
Bellflower, California
AMOUNT
$6,846.82
7,075.55
7,281.95
8,065.14
* * * * * * * * * * * *
It is reconunended that award be made .to Keenan Pipe and Supply Company,
1099 Baker Street, Costa Mesa, California, the lowest and best bidder.
Agenda Item #60 -W-
J. Wayne Sylvester
Director of Finance
District 3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
May 14, 19'71
Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts
cf Ora:nge County, California
Re: 1970-71 State and Federal Construction Grant
Programs
~~~~· ·~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~·~~~~~-
The staff is pleased to forward a copy of a ·
letter addressed to the Environmental Protection
Agency, certifying the State Water Resources
Control Board approval of our Districts' con-
struction projects for a Federal Grant to a
maximum allowable amount of $12.5 million for
the 1970-71 fiscal year.
In accordance vri th the existing State and Federal
Grant Construction Programs, our Districts will
be eligible for 80% of the above-stated amount,
which is approximately $10 million dollars.
The official Federal Grant off er should be forth-
coming within the next thirty days.
· FAH: j
Enclosure·
~a~ \.ICJL,.olll~L..A..
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
TELEPHONES:
AR EA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY CONTROL
~ROOM 1140, RESOURCES BUILDING
1416 NINTH STREET • SACRAMENTO 95814
May 12, 1971
Mr. Paul De Palco, Jr., ·Di rector
Water Quulity Office, Region IX
Environwental Protection Agency
760 MZ!r}:et Street
San Francisco, California 94102
Dear Mr. De Falcoa
RONALD REAGAN, Governor
WPC-Cal-573 (Orange County S .D. -'r~atroent Iroprovemntsl.
Pursuant to regulations for p~ocessing construction grants under
the Fede':"al Water Pollt~tion Control Act, I nm subtnitti.ng the
·applications of County Sn.nitation Districts Ho. 1. 2, 3, 5, 6,· 7,
and 11 of Orange County for Project Ho. WPC-Cal-573 to be
constructed jointly wi.th District No. l as tha central agency ..
The project is included in the Preliminary Interim Water Quality
Managemcmt Plan, SantC'I Ana River Basin, Snmmax.y Report, April 1971.
'l'ha eligible project consiato of 1970-71 improvements and additions
to treatment Plant No. 1 2lnd Plant Mo. 2, and an influent inter-
cepting sewer bet\ieen the plants. The revised total estimated
eligible project cost is $12,540,000.
The project is approved for a federal qrant to the maximum
allowable amount and is approved concurrently for a state grant
under the Clean Water Bond Law of 1970.
Your attention is directed to possible eligibility for a ten
percent increaae in the grant amount for conformance with
comprehensive metropolitan or regional planning.
Certification of this project is subject to tlu~ following conditions
Th~ District shall implement a revenue program in
conformance with Section 2142 of the Clean Water
Grant.Program regulations contained in Subchapter 7
of Chapter 3, Title 23, California-Administrative
Code, and comply with the requirements of other
pertinent sections of Subchapter 7.
'lhia condition will be included in the state grant contract.
...
Paul De Falco, Jr. -2-May 12, 1971
·znclosed is one copy each (except as indicated) of the following
documents a
l. State Priority Certification and Project Approval
(Form FWPCA-7C) -two copies.
2. Application Pqrm WRCB-210 for a state gJ:ant application
under the California Clean Water Bond Law of 1970. and
an increased federal grant.
3. Application Form FWPCA-7 of District No. l as the
central agency with attachments including applicant's
Resolution No. 70-20-l authorizing its representative,
joint agreement with Districts 2~ 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11,
bypass· analysis, statements on planning agency review,
assurance of compliance wit}l the Civil Rights Act, and
revised cost estimate dated May 3, 1971.
4. Application Form FWPCA-7 with applicant's resolution
authorizing its representative for each of tributary
agency Dist.ricts 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11.
s. Modification Bo. l to Engineer's Report, dated Marcil 1970.
6~ Pre-cartification report dated September 17, 1970, and
addendum c.1ated December 23, l070e with design data and
California Regional Water Quality Contl."ol Board, Santa
Ana Region, Resolution No. 59-5 (3-68) prescribing
waste· discharge requirements.
7. Environmental assessment dated February 23. 1971.
a. Applicant's statement dated March 26, 1971, certifying
availability of funds.·
96 Acknowledgments by the State Clearinghouse.
~we understand that the applicant has sent t\<IO sets of the plans and
specifications directly to your office. Enclosed is additional
oupporting material which should ba added to the "secondM copy of
the application sent to the California-Navada Basins office on
October 20_ 1970, for ndvance review.
In accordance with the provisions of Resolutions No. 67-3 and
No. 67-4 of the State Board, the aoolicant•s constniction plans
and specifications have been reviewed and aro approved.
Paul De Falco, Jr. -3-May 12. 1971
~e concur with the environmental assessment as submitted .•
Very truly yours,
/Jr;,flL_)
Paul R. Bonderson
Chief
Enclosures
eca Letmnty Sanitation Districts.of Orange County
John Carollo Engineers
CRWQCB# Santa Ana Region
I
I
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
JOINT MEETING OF THE BO.ARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 an4 11,
OF OR.ANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Direct~rs of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange
·county, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m.,
Ma~y 12 , 19 71 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain
Valley, California.
The Chairman of the Joint Aiministrative Organization called
the meeting to order at 7:30 p~n.
The roll was called an~ the Secretary reporte~ a quorum
p~esent for each District's Boar~.
* * * * * * * * *
DISTRICT 7
Adjournment
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, be adjourned
to May 18th, 1971 at 5:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 9:55 p.m., May 12, 1971.
STATE OF CALIFORNIAl
SS~
COUNTY OF ORANGE
I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the
Boarrls o~ Directors of County Sanitation Distri:ts Noso
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
~o hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full,
true anr. correct copy of minute entries on meeting of
said Boards ~f Directors on the 12thday of May ,
19 71
12th
S-187
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hann this
0ay of May, 1971
BoarGs of Directors
ation Districts Nos.
7, and 11
RESOLUTION NO. ~ '7 /-6 /
RESOLUTION NO. 70 AMENDING RESOLUTIONS 70-3
AND 71-3 RELATING TO .OVEH.TIME FOR SUPERVISOR-
IAL EMPLOYEES
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Distribts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 11 of Orange
County , California, hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1. Section 6 of Resolution 70-3 is
hereby fu~ended to read as follows:
"Section 6. Management and supervisory
personnel who occupy positions which h ave a
salary or salary range exceeding that set forth
in Section 19 of th e Districts' most current
Position s and Salari es resolution, shall not be
compensated for overtime ."
Sect.ion 2.
hereby amended to read
"Section 1 9 .
Section 19 of Reso lution 71-3 is
as follows: '/=fl-
fl-1 1.,-.J!!:1'Ylr v1 ~
N~I\ sup e rvisory employee
who occupies a position that has a salary range
exceeding that of Range No. SOB, as hereinabove
established , shall be compensated under the pro-
visions of Sections 16, 17 and 18 of this resolu-
ti on."
.PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting
held May ·l2, 1971.