HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971-04-14COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX Bl 27, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
April 9, 1971
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
TO: Iv:EMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIHECTORS OF COUN'l1Y SANITATION ,-
___ DISTRICTS NOS. l_ 2, 3,, :J, a, 7, 8, A.:.m l~
Ger:.tlemen:
rrhe ·next regular. meeting of thE; Boa.rds of Dlrecto:c:s of County
Sai1itDtion Districts Hos. l_, 2_, 3, 5:. 6, 7, 8 and all_, of
OraD.t;~e Ccunty, California_,· v.rill be ~eld:
Wednesda .. y evening, A.pr·il 14, 19'""(1
at 7:30 p.:n.
10844 ~llis Avenue
Fountain ValJ.ey, Cali.f'orr~:La.
Tentative adjourrments prior to next regular meeting:
Executive Com.1.11ittee -5:30 p.m., AprLL 27th
II
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday, April 14, 1971
7 :30 p .m .
P. 0 . Box 5175
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Va lley, Cal i f., 92708
Te lephones:
Aree Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
April 9, 1971
CEREMONIES MARKING COMPLETION OF OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2: As all
Directors have been previously advised by Chairman Culver, in the
afternoon preceding this meeting there will be a program of tests,
inspections and ceremonies marking the long-awaited completion of
this facility. More specific details are included in a separate
notice mailed today.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The following is a brief explanation of the more important non-
routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not
otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are not attached to the
agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but
will appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Joint Boards
Nos. 9 and 10 -REPORT OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND ACTIONS ON
COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATIONS: Th e Committee met on the evening of
March 23 with Directors Harve y and Mcinnis as guests. A report on
the meeting, together with the recommendations to the Joint Board has
been previously mailed to the Directors. Agenda Ite m No. 1 0 (a and b)
is consideration of the recommendations reached by the Committee at
this meeting .
No. 11 -CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS: The staff has chosen the following
agenda items which are believed to fall into this category in accord-
ance with the d efinition recently established by the Boards:
(a) a nd (b) Completion of Plant Job No. P2-16 -This
contract with J.E. and W.W. Hoagland was for the constructi on
of a new sedimentat ion basin and diges ter at Plant No. 2 . The
work was satisfactorily completed on March 31 and the staff
recommends its a cc ep tance. Item (a ) is Change Order No. 5,
adding the sum of $428 to the contract price for the extra work
described in the formal change order i nc lud ed in the agenda
material and granting an extension of time of Bo days for the
reasons set forth. Item (b) is the customary resolution
accepting the job as complete and authorizing filing of the
Notice of Completion.
(c) Change Order No. 1 to Plant Job No. P2-17 -This
recently awarded contract for a new digester and sedimentation
basin at Plant No. 2 has been described in previous agenda
reports. We have been advised by the Environmental Protection
Agency that in order to preserve our eligibility for a Federal
grant on this project, it will be necessary to include a new
clause concerning bypassing of wastewater during construction.
Accordingly, this recommended change order incorporates the
required provisions in the specifications.
(d) ~roval of Plans and Specifications for Plant Job
No. P2-19 -Our next regularly budgeted and scheduled con-
struction project at Plant No. 2 is the addition of two addi-
tional sedimentation basins and digesters to handle the
increased flow expected upon completion of the Interplant
Influent Interceptor project which was reported on at the March
meeting. John Carollo Engineer.s advise that plans and specifi-
cations will be ready for approval at this meeting with receipt
of bids scheduled for May 18. The engineer's estimate for this
job is $1A700,000 which is eligible for a Federal and State
grant of ~0% of the total project cost.
(e) Extension of Time for Ocean Outfall No. 2 -Included
with the agenda material is a formal change order granting an
extension of time as recommended by the engineers and staff and
most of which has been previously approved by the Board. As
will be noted on the change order, this final extension of time
establishes April 2 as the operational completion date. Since
the outfall was put into service for testing purposes on March
31 and determined to be performing satisfactorily on April 1,
it appears that the contractor has met the time requirements
of the contract.
No. 12 -FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF FORMAL PROTEST BY CONTRACTOR ON
OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2: The Directors will recall that this matter was
deferred from the March 10 meeting at the request of the contractor
in order to enable him to present a detailed claim for extra costs
involved in correction of the movement of the pipe on the ocean floor
after installation but prior to placing of protective rock. The
original contractor's letter of August 27, 1970 protesting the engi-
neer's denial of the Districts' liability in this matter is included
with the agenda material along with the recently submitted detailed
claim for extra costs amounting to $477,072.04. Also included in the
material are current communications from John Carollo Engineers and
the General Counsel on this subject.
During discussion of this matter the engineers will go into
further detail regarding their conclusions concerning this claim, if
-2-
desired, and the contractor's representatives may be
their side of the matter. Also, the General Counsel
legal aspects in the event of denial of the protest.
should be reached by the Boards at this meeting.
present to argue
will discuss
A final decision
No. 13 -STAFF REPORT ON INTERIM SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN PLAN: This
matter is of extreme importance to the Districts inasmuch as it
relates to State and Federal funding of our future construction
projects. The State Water Pollution Control Law (Porter-Cologne Act)
requires the establishment of long-range plans for each drainage
basin of the State with the individual Regional Wa ter Quality Control
Boards given the responsibility of preparing such a plan for each
region, subject to approval by the State Wa t er Re sources Con trol
Board.
The Federal Water Quality Control Law a nd r e gulati ons a lso
require establishme nt of river basin plans which must b e finalized
and approved by July 1, 1973. In the meantime , t h e Fe d eral authori-
ties requ ire interi m pla ns until the f ~_n al ba sin p lans are a dopted
and approved. The imp ortanc e of t h e p ::'..a.n s to a gen cies s u c h a s ours
is that they will set forth definite pr n jects for p ollution control
in each river basin and j _f a p roposed project is not included in the
plan, it will not be eligible for State and Federa l fu..~d ing .
Conversely, the inclusion of a project in the basin plan will probably
mean that pressure will be exerted for its construction regardless of
local ac c eptance and wh e ther or not St a te and Federal a ssista nce will
be provide d.
We have been advised by the Santa Ana River Basin Regional
Water Qu a lity Cont~ol Bo a rd that a d raft of i t s interim plan for the
b a sin will be a vailable Monda y, April 12, and that a hea ring on the
plan will be held on April 29 . Since we hav e not h a d a n opportunity
to review the plan in its draft form as yet, we cannot state a t this
time what it contains or make recommend a tions as to Bo a rd action.
However , it is expected that by the time of the meeting copie s of the
draft pla n wi J.l be a vailable for Bo a rd study a nd f urther act i on. The
interim plan, described above , is required to be fully deve l oped and
approved by July 1 by the Sta te Wa ter Resources Control Board and,
accordingly, our timetab le of actions in this reg a rd will be very
limited.
District No. l
No. 17 -ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED S : Th e Di strict No. 1 trunk sewer
lies in a n easement para lle l to the Southern Pacific Ra ilroad tracks
between Bristol and Main Streets. The developer of two overlying
tracts h a s requested to be allowed to deed the property, which was
unusable in the tract development , in fee to the District without
cost. We therefore recommend a c ceptance of the deeds and authori-
zation for their recording.
-3-
Dis t rict No . 5
No. 22 -ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT, CONTRACT NO. 5-18 : This project, for
the installation of an underwater force main crossing adjacent to the
Bay Bridge, is now under way. I ts construction required the acqui-
sition of an easement from the Irvine Company and the consent of its
tenants . We recommend acceptance and execution of the easement and
authorization for its recording.
No . 23 -AWARD OF PURCHASE OF NEW PUMP AND DRIVE SHAFT FOR BAY BRIDGE
PUMPING STATION: Bids for this equipment, which was described in the
March agenda report, were opened on April 6 . Only one bid was
received, from Fairbanks Morse, Inc., Pump Division, at a total price
of $1 4,179 .20. Since the bid is for the equipment specified and the
cost is under our estimate of $16,ooo, we recommend that the award of
purchase be made on the basis of this bid.
District No . 8
No. 30 -FINANCIAL REPORT: Our independent auditors, Hanson,
Peterson, Cowles and Sylvester, Certified Public Accountants, in
February mailed directly to the Board members a quarterly report on
Districts' financial position for the period ending December 31, 1970.
The staff will be prepared to answer any questions the Directors may
have concerning this financial report .
The report was accepted by the other Boards in February . Since
the District No . 8 Board meets only quarterly, it is recommended that
similar action be taken at this time .
District No. 3
No. 37 -CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 TO CONTRACT NO . 3-15: This contract for
the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole Repair was given a lengthy time
for completion because of the special difficulties in the work.
During the course of the work to date an additional manhole was
determined to be in a badly deteriorated condition and the staff
recommends that its repair be included in the contract. The engi-
neering staff has arrived at a lump sum price of $2,500 for this
additional work and, as stated in the formal change order attached to
the agenda, also recommends an extension of time of 21 days for the
extra work .
No. 38 -APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 3-16:
The next regularly scheduled trunk sewer to be constructed under the
1968 Master Plan is the Beach Boulevard Relief Trunk from Artesia
Street and Rostrata Avenue to Beach Boulevard and Rosecrans Avenue in
Buena Park. Boyle Engineering, the design engineers on the project,
have advised that plans and specifications are ready for advertising
for bids which are scheduled to be taken on May 10 with award at the
May Joint. Board meeting. The engineer's estimate for the construction
cost of this project is $518,ooo.
-4-
No. 39 -REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL ON.MANHOLE COATING FAILURE LITI-
GATION: During a recent report on this matter, Mr. Nisson requested
the assistance of a committee of Directors regarding possible settle-
ment of the litigation. This Committee, consisting of Directors
Harvey, Burton and Davis, was appointed by the Chairman and has met
with Mr. Nisson on this matter. The General Counsel advises that a
further report on this litigation will be made at the meeting.
District No. 7
No. 43 -APPROVAL OF ADDENDUM NO. 1 FOR CONTRACT NO. 7-6-2: Addendum
No. 1 to this job (Sunflower Interceptor from Bear Street to Main
Street) was issued after the Metropolitan Water ·Districtrequested a
belated chang e in the specifications requiring tight sheeting in the
vicinity of that District's facility in Bristol Street. The addendum
also corrected certain minor errors in the plans. A copy of the
addendum is attached to the agenda material and should be approved
prior to award of the contract (Item No. 44).
No. 44 -AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. 7-6-2: Bids for this job, the second
reach of the Sunflower Interceptor (from Bear Street to Main Street),
were opened on April 7 and as noted at the time of the award of the
first reach of the interceptor, the present time is very favorable
for competitive bidding on such projects. This is borne out by the
fact that nine bids were received. The low bidder, Ernest P. Pestana,
Inc., of San Jose (see bid tabulation attached to the agenda material),
submitted a bid of more than 10% below the engineer's es timate and of
the other eight bidders, four were below the estimate of $1,425,000.
Although the Pestana firm has not worked for the Districts before it
has a good reputation in northern California. The District's staff
and engineers are recommending that this firm be awarded the contract
at their bid of $1,278,238.
No. 45 -ACCEPTANCE OF NO COST EASEMENTS: We recommend acceptance aod
authorization for recording of the three no cost sewer easements
listed on the formal agenda.
No. 46 -CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 , CONTRACT NO. 7-6-1: Pipe is now being
manufa ctured for this project (Sunflower Interceptor from Treatment
Plant No. 1 to Bear Street) and the contractor plans to commence work
in the very near future. He has requested permission to install
84-inch diameter pipe instead of the 81-inch size called for in the
plans, the reason apparently being that his pipe supplier finds it
more economical to build the larger pipe. Since the substitution
gives the inte rceptor a greater capacity and will not increase the
cost of the contract, we recommend approval of the change order.
No. 47 -CHANGE ORDER NO. 2, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-1: We have be en advised
by the Environmental Protection Agency that in order to preserve our
eligibility for a Federal grant on this project, it will be necessary
to include a new clause concerning bypassing of wastewater during
construction. Accordingly, this recommended change order incorporates
the required provision in the specifications.
-5-
District No. 2
Nos. 53, 54 and 55 -NEGOTIATIONS WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY CONCERNING
THE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR FROM PLANT NO. 1 TO KATELLA AVENUE:
At the March 30 adjourned meeting of the Board, the three items
appearing on the agenda were deferred to this meeting and a committee
of the Directors (Chairman Just, Directors Culver, Battin, Smith and
Wedaa) was appointed to confer with elected officials of Riverside
County to attempt to expedite matters in view of the critical timing
problems involved in obtaining State and Federal assistance on this
project.
The Committee has scheduled a meeting with the Riverside offi-
cials which will be held after this report has been prepared. It is
our understanding that the Riverside County Board of Supervisors will
vote on Monday, April 12, on whether to proceed with participation in
this project. Accordingly, very little new information can be
presented at this time. However, if the Directors' Committee is
successful in its discussions with the Riverside people and if the
Riverside County Board of Supervisors acts favorably on this matter
on Monday, adoption of the actions deferred from the adjourned meeting
will be in order.
-6-
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
@Joint Chairman Culver reported on the ceremonies held that
day dedi cating new ocean outfall No . 2 . Representatives of
the -Wta.te Water Resources Control Boa.rd and the Water
Quality office of the Environmental Protection Agency
X:KXN:~N:M attended, several local officials and representatives
of the pres s attended the the ceremoney officially placing
the new faci li ies into,--!"ervice . The Joint Chairman
~~~~~ \ '> \[ '<\€'., y
introduced Mr . ohlier, a member of the 1 971 Grand Jury who
was in att:andance at the meet i ng. He then presented 10
year award blah,bla.h,blah and called executive meeting
71 #9 -Executive Committee meeting -receive and f i le report
further moved : following a. brief di s cu s sion it was moved
and second and duly carried t h at t h e General Counsel be directed
XMXXXNMixxMM X~XM~M~X~XMXXXMMXEIXXXI~XK
to study t h e possibility of t h e Distri cts acquiring prescrip t ive
to odor n u isance.
General Manager reported on meetings h eld wit h
official s of t h e Water Qual ity Office of t h e En vironmental
Protection Agenc y in Was h ington concerning construc t ion
grants and interceptor sewer s . Mr . Harper read t h e letter
received from the s ubcessful bidder on a recent Di s trict
interceptor s ewer job complimenting the District s design
engi neer on t h e XMMNX t h oroughne s s of the plans and
t h e
specifications and pointing out t h at/Districts realize
con s iderable s avings on con s truction bid s wh en t h e d ocuments
a.re a.s complel8e and tho s e referred to . ~'---(> ~-T he ~ra.l Manager reported t h at copie s of the Cal i f ornia.
c__on~ va ~
Regional Water Qua.li t y e Lorrro-l Boa.rd Interim San ta Ana Ri v er
Ba.sin P lan, sc h eduled for publ i c h earing on Ap r il 29th, h ad n o t
reviewed
yet been realized by the Regional Bo ard . He ~~~~X:M'M:M copies of
the eligible project list for federalX:M'ri and state grants
which had b een excerpted from the report and rece i ved from t he
Regional Board .
Mr . Harper further reported on the r egulat ions gove r ning
administration of Stat e and Federal construction gr ants which
had been adopted by the State Wa ter Resources Control Board
on April 1st a n d re iterated the staff 's concern over the
provi s ions of the regul ations concerning eligibility of
i nte rc eptors for fund ing , the implementation of sewer use
charges and requirments to be placed on the i ndustrial
community for pa.y -ba.ck of investment and capital interest
cost s . The a pparent interpreation of these proviions by t h e
State Boa.r d will result in considerable economic consequences for
the Dis trict i n the area of interceptor funding and ma.inte.na.nce,
and operation costs as well as administrative overhead and
the apparent effect on the industrial commun ity in connect i on
with industrial wast e dischargers .
@ -Following a l engthy d i scussion concerning the scheduling
and routing of the inte rplant influent interceptor , Job No .
I -8, to be constructed i n Ellis Av e nue and Brookhurst Street
in F ountain Valley and Huntington Be a.ch from Pl ant No . 1 t o
and
Plant No . 2, i t was moved,/seconded : That the matter be
referred to the Districts ' stalfif and enginee r for further
study with t he City of Hun tington Beach s t a ff and report
and r ecommendations back to the joint boa.rd . Mot i on fa.i l a d
to carry .
\iii) In reponse to an inquiry by a bo ard memb er concerning a
news article XM:.M:.XX~lli:~~~~X~~X'ri~ purporting that North AF Base
' i
was dumping chemicals into the Orange County sewerage system,
Mr . Harper reported that the AF discharges were MX:M: being
processed th~ough the Los Angeles County XX~ system.
#23 -Following a report by the District 1 s maintenance
superintendent it was moved, seconded and duly carried :
#39 -Following a report by the General Counsel regarding a
sl!:lttlement of the manhole coating litigation scheduled for
trial on Tuesday, April 20th, it was moved, seconded and
duly carried: That the special committee (give comm name
September minutes) be directed to meet with the General
a
Counsel and authorized to accept or reject/settlement
NXXX~~~X off er tendered by the defendent in lieu of
-
·\B#District 2 -Chairman Just reported on a meeting of the
Speca.il Committee with the elected representatives from
Riverside concerning the Santa. Ana. River Basin Pruject and
advised that no action had been ta.ken regarding this matter .
Whereupon it was moved , seconded and duly carried :
•..
. .,
#6 -reported on new outfall ceremonies -presented 10 year
a.ward to Bill Clarke, called executive meeting 5 :30 April 7th -
Donald Winn and Robert Finnell i nvi t ed to attend and to
participate in discussions -introduced Mr . Hohlier of 1971
grand jury
#9 -Miller report ed on o dor control report -ma.de recommendations
on sei Rg putting enclosure on ~~thought this was too
expensive -wait until we see Wfiast6£P1ng so much chlorination
does a.s far as odors are concerned
Battin -suggestion of Executive Committee -ask General
Counsel if there is any possibility of acquiring prescriptive
right s for odors (easemen ts) -General Counsel doesn't know
if there i s legally possibility or not -thinks it might be
worthwhile to look into
MS&DC to di r ect G:a neral Counsel to look into this matter of
odor easements .
#7 -Reported on trip to Washington -received letter from
Bidder on one of our p r ojects congratulating us on
plans and specifications
#12 -Moved that we deny claim 5 '\-\J <::_
#13 -Mr . Ha rper reported that we have not received interim
plan report -hearing on this report on the 29th of this
month .-Included in agenda. material -group 1 projects get
top priority in d i stribution of funds -group 3 is interceptor
sewers -state boa.rd just adopted regulations retroactive to
January 1 -requirements for establishing sewer use charges -
~~~~M~~XQili~X~~~ix consider this program only a five year
program -we have continuous maintenance, etc . of our facilities
At executive comm i ttee meeting some information will be brought
to the Executive Committee on these new regulations -regulations
state that group 3 projects not being X~X:W~MM:MXX~ funded for
next three yea.rs -even if projects qualify for funding
agency building project must fund it entirely for 3 year period
and then ge t reimbursed -concerned about interpretation of
charges for individ:U¥ community -regulations adopted w.ould
require that the w.~ pay back not only ca.pi tal investment
but also int erest acc r"\led, etc .
#16 -Coen -Two weeks a.go one of XKM:llXM:Pl:~XPl:M:~X our engineers
ma.de a. ~2i:X:fiXM:Pl:XXXX~ p r esentation to Huntington Be ach concil
on trunk lin e goi ng down brookhurst -~Pl::fi home owners association
(homes contiguous t o Brookhurs t ) ma.de protest a.t council
meeting. Letter recffiived by BB Council from Chamber of Commerce
also on state project going down hiwa.y 39 at same t ime . Feels
that these two projects would be a. hardship on t hese bus i nesses .
McWhinney -Moved that this item be referred to staff of
Distric t for s t udy with staff of city of Huntington Beach
for report and/or recommendation back to the Boards.
F innell -his understanding that a great deal of work had
e been done by the staff
Coen -Board could review constructi on dates so that state
and Di stri ct project do not run at the same time -Council
had no knowledge of this until two weeks ago
Supports concern of HB council to minimize inconvenience
to citizens .
Vote of moti on of McWhinney -hand vote -8 for
majority opposed motion failed
Gibbs -error of three HB boa.rd members not relating to
rest of counc i l on construction of I -8 -possibly work could
be done at night
Lewis -Trying to get with everyone affected on this meeting
with PTA, etc, met with Merchants Group at Adams Intersection
They don 't like it but seems more they understand more
receptive they are toward this construct i on
Gibbs -commending staff on meeting with business, etc.
Good pub l ic relations
Question -what about chemical from Norton AF Base that
Senatory sai d .W.e§.M:X~ are being dumped into ORange County
sewers? -Mr . Harper -chemi cals a.re from pho togr aphic lab
at norton AF base -these chemicals are not being dumped
into orange county system -but LA Sanitation Districts
#23 -Nine people bid -were specs written in such a way that
they could not possibly bid? No specs we re not written t hat
way -Worthi ngton Corporation going through a transition
their d elivey date was prohiblil..tive -Allis Chaihmers doesn't
have a pump that will fit -reported Bill Clark e
#39 -This suit schedul ed for tri a l Tuesday -special committee
has met and discussed possibilities of settlement with defendents
have had a tentative offer by contractor to agr ee to r epair
r es t of manhol es at same rates as present ones being :X:M~X:fl:X
repaired for . -Contract.e§.1:'. is seven years old and new prices
might be from 16 to 20% higher -ask staff to evaluate bid-
staff feels it might be worth quite a bit
Motion -authorize staff to meet and confer with GC and
to have autotity to a~thorize settlement
#53 -Just ma.de special committee report -met with two members
of Board of supervisors of Riverside County and they have
2 -2 split of vote -5 members of board a.nd one is in hospital -
vote deadlocked - -defer a.11 actions a.nd see if a.ny
action is ta.ken by Riverside -liQ§MMXXXM:M: to meet a.gain on the
19th a.t 5 :00 Board
In answer to question on ca.use of dissenting votes Just
said that they were reacting to reaction of public on
envi ronmental protection, etc .
Miller requests District #2 Board membess to report back
to joint boards on what is happending in Riverside
. '
II
BOAr?OS or: DmECTORS
County S;rni!ation Distr ic ts P. 0. Box 5175
o f O ra nge County, Ca li forn ia 10844 Ei lis J,v·~nuc
Fountain Va lley, Coi iF., 9 27C3
.....-( 1)
v{2)
J 3)
(1+)
../
(5)
:===----------------='---------------==--=
A GE t~ DA
/ AD JOU RN MENTS .... "-
COM P & MILEAGE ..• ~
Apri l lL~, 1971 -7 :30 p .mo
Pledg e of All egiance and I nvoca.tion
Roll Call
~ .Appointment of Chairmen pro t em , if necessary ~
~'~:~L~~~o~=··~·~Rr;::;~~l/
LETIERS WRITTEN ..... V.::::::.
. MI NUTES WRITIEN ..•... J!. ..
MI NUTES HLED .... (..c.'.".: ..••
Consideration of motion to receive and fi l e minute
excerp ts from the variou s cities regarding electi ons
of mayors and appo j_n tments of al ternat e s,, and seating
new membe:s of "the Boards
EA CH DISTRICT
Conside rati on of mot i ons app:coving minutes of the
f ollowi ng mee tings , as mail ed :
.... IJ i st:rict l -Ma.n :h 1ot:r1 I"e[~ula.r M'S .__..Di strict 2 .March l Ot!J. regl.!.l c..r 8:1d Mj.;
M.a.r cl1 30ti1 a.djourned fl\\ s v-Disi:;ric t 3 -March 1 0th reguJ a.r
.__,....District 5 -March 10th r egu.l ar M ~S .__District 6 M.a.rch 1 0th r eg'J.l a.r /VI s·
vDistrict 7 -March 1 0th r egul a.r and M \ s
Ma.rch 16th ad-i ou rn ed
i--·· District 8 -Janua.!'y 13~h ~·egu.lar /V\ls
District 11 -i1'1arch 10th r egular /\11 J.s
ALL DISTRICTS
~eport of t he Jcint Chairman
ALL DISTRIC·rs
Report of t he Ger;eral J.vl anager
('Rz ~ALJADIS":8.R~CTS\. "-~ _ ~ the"oen~a.l ~u1'ee\
~ ALL DISTRICTS ---V Report of' the Executive Committee
of "motion to receive a.nd fj_le the
report
a nd consj_d e raticn
Co mm ittee 1 s \I .Ti t"ten
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of action on items recommended by the
Executive Committee :
(a) Consideration of action concerning accrued
compensatory time of deceased employee , as
recommended by the Executive Committee :
(1 ) Consideration of motion to receive
M\s
and file letter dated February 1 6 ,
1971, from Robert B . Holland , attorney,
and memorandum dated January 27, 1971,
from C. Arthur Ni sson, General Counsel ......
.....----
,.,....... .
(b)
----N\\ s
(2)
~\s
(3)
~s
(4)
fi\\s
Consideration of motion d e nying claim
for payment of 787 .5 hours of accrued
compensatory time to the es tate of
decea.sed employee_, in accordance with
provisions of current salary regulations
Cons id era.tion of motion authorizing payment
of 53 hours accrued compensato r y time
to the estate of deceased employee, in
accordance with provisions of prior
salary regulat ions
Consideration of motion di rect ing the
General Counsel to ~dvise the attorney
for the fam ily of deceased employee of
legal provisions preventing payment of
accrued compensatory time
Consideration of motion authorizing the staff and
engineers to i mplement the Phase I recommendations
of the Odor Control Study and directing the e ngineer
t o defer comp l etion of ·the report pending the
evaluation of od or control by prechlorination, a.s
rec ommended by the Executive Co m.m ittee
(11) ALL DISTRIC TS
* * * * * * * * * *
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters placed upon the consent calendar
are considered as not requiring discussion
or further explanation and unless any particular
item is r equested to be removed from the
consent calendar by a Director_, staff membe r,
or member of the public in attendance, t he re
will be no separate discussion of t hese items .
All items on the consent calendar will be
enacted by one action approving all mot i ons ,
and ca.sting a unanimous ballot for r esolutions
included on the consent calendar . All items
removed from the consent calendar shall be
considered sepa rately in the regular order of
business .
Members of the public who wish to rem ove an item
from t he cons e nt ca.lenda.r shall , upon recog nition
by the chair, state their ~ame, add r e ss and
designate by l e tte r the it ~m to be removed from
t he consent calendar .
-2 -
L
(lla )
* * * * * * * *
Chairman w.ill determine if any items are
to be de le ted from the consent caleridar .
Consideration of action t o approve all agenda
items appearing on the consent calendar not
specifically removed from same .
Consideration of motion approving Change
Order No . 5 to t he plans and sp2cifications
for Sedimentation Basin "J " and Digester
"J " at Plant No . 2;, J ob No . P 2-16 , autho r i zing
an addition of $42b .O O ar1 d granting an 80 day
exte nsion of time to the contract with J .E .
and W. · W. Hoa.gland . See page "D"
Consideration of Reso l u ti on No . 7 1 -42,
accepting Sedim.enta.tion Ba.sin "J" and Digester
11 J 11 at Plant No . 2, Job No . P2 -16, as comple t e ,
and aut horizing execution of a Notice of
Completion . See page 11 E 11
Consideration of motion approving Change
Orde r No . 1 to the plans and specifications
for Sedimenation Basin "K" and Digeste r "K"
a.t Plant No . 2, Job No . P2 -l 7, incorporating
.Federal bypass standards into S e ction 9 of
the Specifications . See page 11 F 11
Conside ration of Resol ution No . 7 1~43,
·approving plans and specifications for
Sedimentation Bas i ns "L" arid 11 M11 and Digesters
"L" and "M" at P lan.t No . 2, Job No . P2-19; and
authori z ing advertis i ng for bids to be opene d
1 1 : 00 a . m., May 18 . See page "G 11
Consideration of motion to r e c e ive and file
letters from J ohn Carollo Engineers and Pete r
Kiewit Sons 1 Company , and granting a. three day
e xtension of t i me for completion of Ocean
Outfall No . 2 , Marine Section, Job No . J-10;
and approving Cha.n.ge Ord er No . 7 t o the plans
and specifications for Ocean Outfall No . 2 -
Marine Section, Job No. J -10, granting
previously -approved t i me extensions totaling
11 day s , to the contra.ct with Peter Kiewit
Sons ~ Company . S ee pages 11 H11
, n1 11
and "J " '
ISTRICTS ~ ~
Considerai~;_9p~ch items del e ted~"S"8n t ca1endar, i f
any
Q ALL DIS TRI CTS Q Consideration of action on finaJ. de.cision of engineer
J\JJ S /on the formal pro t e st of P e t e r Kiewit S ons 1, Contractor ,
\ on Oc ean Outfall No. 2 -Marine Section , Job No . J -10 . \e\\e.'f (Deferred from Ma r ch 10th meeting at Co nt rac t or 1 s r e ques t .)
See pages 11 K11
, "L" , "M" , and "N 11
ALL DISTRICTS
Verbal staff report on California Reg ional Water Quality
Control Boa.rd Inte rim Santa Ana River Basin P lan
-3-. ' -
(14) ALL DI STRICTS
(15)
\\o\\
!., ~~\\
®
(17)
~7
(1 8 )
Conside rati o n of' motion to r ec e ive and file certification )
of the Genera l Manager that he has che cked all bills /VJ ~
appearing on the ag enda, found them to be in o rder, and
that he rec ommends authorization.for payment
ALL DI STRI CTS
Considerati o n of roll call vote motion approving Joint \
Operating, Ca:pital Outl ay Revolving , and Construction c;
Insp ection Re volving Fund warrant books for signature (']\ /
of the Chairman o f District No . 1 , and authorizing
payme nt of claim s listed on pag e 11 A11
ALL DI STRI CTS
Othe r bufui-n e ss and communications , if any
G ~ ....., ~ ---6' .,._] :1 9 ~
DISTRIC'I' 1
Con s ide ration of Re solutions No s . 71-44 -1 and 71 -45 -1,
auth o rizing a cc ep t ance o f Corpo ration Grant Deeds from
Levitt and S o n s o f Califo rnia., Inc., relative to existing
easeme nt for the Dyer Road trunk . See pages 11 0 11
and "P" --
DIST RIC.T 1 .
Co nsi d era t i on o f mo tion approvi ng warrants , if any .
See p age "B"
DISTRI CTS 1 & 7 \
Con s i de r a t ion o f mo tion a p p rov i n* su spe n se fund ti\ 0
warr ants , i f any . See page "c ' u
(21) DIS TRICT l
Con s i de ration of motion to adj ourn ~ :·3 0
(22) DISTRI CT 5
Con s i d e r a tio n of Re s olution
acc e ptanc e and e x e c ution o f
Comp any, in conn e c i:;ion with
Upper Ne wport Ba.y Cro s sing ,
page "Q"
No . 71-46 -5 , auth orizing
eas e me nt from ~he Irvine
Sewe r Tru nk 11 B 1: -Un i t 7 ,
Con tract No . 5-18 . S ee
Con sideration o f Res olution No . 71 -51-5 , to rec e ive B DIS TRICT 5
~· I,./' and file bid tabulation and r e comm e ndation , an d a wa rding
"'<_'(:..o/ f't\\\ ,;e on tr a.ct f o r Se1vage P u mp and Drive S h af t , Bay Bridg e
/ \\e "<"'/Pu.rnpi n g St a.ti on, Jo i) No . 5 -1 2B , to Fairb an k s Mo rs e Inc ,
\e. Pmnp Divis i on ,in the a.uount of $1 4 .179 .20 . See pag es "R" and "s 11 ..,
(24) DIS TRICT 5
Co n s ide ratio n of mo tion app roving warr ants, if any .
See p age "B" f1/\ ) s
(~) D I S~ ~-. "-
( . · ~ O t h e~ b uBj.n e;j'-.and ~.mu nka.~n ~i f~S\
1, .... -{·26 ) DISTRI C'I' 5
Co n s i de ration of motio n t o e.d j ourn ·ci ~ 3 t:J
.·
(2 7)
(28 )
(2 9) DI S TR I CT 6 _....,.,
Cons i der a tion o f mo tion to a d j ourn ~ ·.? '.:>
(30 ) DIS TRICT 8
Conside ration of mot i on to r eceive and fi le Quarterly
Rep o r t submi t ted by Hanson , Pete r son _, Co wl es and
Sylvester , Certified Publ i c Account ants , for the
period .ending Decembe r 3 1, 1 970 , a s previ ous l y mailed
to Di rect o r s by audi to rs
(3 1\ D:Kp TRIC1\ 8 \ O~er b~in~s ~ c~n i ~ion~ i i\_an~
(32) DISTRicrr 8
Consideration o f motion to adjourn CZ):3 ~
(3 3)
(34)
(35 )
(36 )
DIS RICT 11 . . \
0th r bus·in~ and~un i ca17i.~, i\ any :.
DISTHI TS 3 & 11 .
Conside rat i on of motion approving suspense fund
warrants, if any . See page "B "
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of mo t ion to adjou rn
(37) DISTRICT 3
(38 )
(40)
(41 )
Consideration of mo tion app r oving Change Ord e r
No. 4 to t he plans a_nd specifications for
Miller -Hold e r Trunk Sewer Manhole Repair, Contract f/I S
No . 3 -15 , a u thori z ing an addition of $2 ,500 .00
and granting a. 21 day extension of time to the
contract with Cook & Barle tta, Inc . See page 11 T 1:
DISTRICT 3
Co n sideration of Resolution No . 7 1 -L~7 -3 , approvi ng M\ S
plans and specificati o n s for Bea.ch Relief Trunk.
Sewer, Reache s 1 7, 18 & 1 9 , from Rostrata Avenue to
Rosecrans Avenue, Contract No . 3 -16 ; a nd authorizing
a d vertising fo r bids to b e opene d May 1 0 t h a t 11:00 a .m.
See page "U"
DISTRICT 3 ~
Verbal report of General Coun se l on manhole c o a ting
failure litig ation
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of mot ion approving warrants , if any .
See page "B 11
-5 -
•'
(42) DISTR ICT 3
-Consideration of motion to adjourn
(1+3) DISTRICT 7
Cons i deration of motion approving Add endum No . 1
to the plans and spe cifications for t h e Sunflower I
.._ Interceptor, Rea.ch 2, Contrac t No . 7-6 -2~ f r om (\!\ 5
Bear Street to Main Stree t . See page 1 V11
(4~·) DISTRICT 7 J ;consideration of Resolution No . 71 -48 -7 , to r e c eive
<)7·'Q... ~'t> and file bid tabulation and recomrnenda.tion and "'('" «rtJ awarding c ontract for Sunflowe r Interceptor, Re ach \~ 2, Contract No . 7 -6 -2 , from Bear Street to Ma in
1..-Street, t o Ernest E . Pestana, Inc . in the amount
of $1,278 ,238 .00 . See pages ~-'' __ and 11 x 11
-
(45 )
( l.J.6 )
( 47)
(48 )
~
(50 )
(51)
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resol ution No . 71 -49 -7, authorizing
acceptance of Grant of Ea.sement from Irvine Industrial
Co mp lex in connection with extension of McGaw Avenue
Sewer from Von Karman to Flood Control Chc> .. nnel , at no
c ost to t he District . See pr.ge 11 Y11
DISTRI CT 7
Consideration of motion app r ovi ng Change Ord er No . 1
to the plans and sp e cifications for Sunflower I nte rc ep tor ,
Re a ch 1,, Con tract No . 7 -6 -1, authoriz i ng increase i n
pipe size ,, to t he c ontra ct with Sull y -Miller . See page 11 2 11
DISTR IC T 7
Conside ration of motion approvi ng Change Order No . 2
to the pl ans and spec i fications for Sunflower Interceptor_,
Rea.ch 1, Cont1'act No . 7 -6 -1, incorporating Federal bypass
standards into Sect i on 9 of t he Specifications , to the contract
with Sully-llliller. See page . 11 AA 11
·
DI STR IC1J' 7
Consideration of Reso luti on No . 'Tl -50 -7,, authorizing AA C-
a.cce·ptance of Gr ant Deed from Irvine I ndustrial Comp l ex t v1 ....:)
r e lative to san it a r y sewer r equ irements be t ween Red
Hill Av enue and Orange Co unty Airp ort , at no cost to
the District . See page 11 BB 11
DISTR I CT 7
Cons i de ration of Resolution No . 71 -52 -7 , authori zing
acceptence of Grant Deed from I rvine Industrial Comp l ex
rel a tive t o sanitary sewe r requirements between Red
Hill Ave nue and Orenge County Ai r po r t ,, at no cost to
the District . See page 11 cc 11
DISTRIC T 7
Consid eration of mot ion app r ovi ng warrants , if any. NI n
See. p age 11 C11 ['I ~
DIST_ TCT 7 ~ \~
Other busines~d co~nic~ons ,,\_if ~y
(52 ) DISTEICI 7
Consid~raticn of motion to adjou r n
-6-
.....
0 DISTRICT 2 ~ Consideration of Resolution No. 71-42-2, approving and
~(authorizing execution of Second Amendment and First
\ \ Supplement to Waste Water Interceptor Capacity Agreement
/Y ! providing for alternate financing of Riverside County
Flood Control and Water Conservation District's share in
the construction costs of Santa. Ana. River Intercerrtor
from Plant No. 1 to Ka.tella Avenue. ·see pages 'DD"
and "EE"
(54) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion requesting County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, to adopt First
Amend.rnent to May 1970 Waste Water Treatment and Disposal
Agreement with Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation Dis~rict, in order to effectuate Second
Amendment a.nd First Supplement to Waste Water Interceptor
-Ca.pa.city Agreement. See page 11 FF 11
(55)
)}! \~ (
~
~
(56)
(57)
(58)
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to receive and file and refer
to Exe cu ti ve Contrni ttee and st a.ff letter dated April _,
1971~ from Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Ocnservation District requesting provision be ma.de for
interim service to Riverside agencies through the
Santa Ana River Interceptor, said service to consist
of acceptance of trucked brine waste to the facilities
of the Districts. See page "GG" ~
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "B 11
~STRICT ~ \., ,~; r ~ther bu~ness an"\_ com..rn~.\cati~,· ~ ~
DISTRICT 2 .
Consideration of motion to adjourn ~ ', 50
~ 11'
-7-
Mee ting Date ~~~\'\\
DI S'IiRICT 1 ~ t~ C\
Gris et --;?-He rri n
Mi l l e r Coc o
Porte r ~~ Batt in
DI STRICT 2
Just Harpe r
~-Chr is t ie Root
nark Magnus
Culve r
Ste phe n son Dutton
Finne ll ~ Gome z
He r rin Gri se t
Sims Zunig a
Smi th 1/ Hi l e man
Wedaa ~ Machad o
Wi nn Schn?-e pp
Batt i n
DI ST RICT ~ Culve r
Arbi so Lew i s
Baum Hogard
Berton ± Wes tra
Chris tie --7; Roo t
Clark Mag nus
Davis C?' Bousma_r1
Stephe nso$ Dutton
Green . Shipley
Harvey "' Kan e l
Herrin i7" Gri se t·
Hy d e ~ Kr oe s e n
J us t Harper
f ~W hinne y ~
Zuniga l mS
Ba ttin 1/
DI STRICT 5
Parsons L Hirth ± Croul
Battin
DISTR ICT 6
Porter ± Mc I nnis Hirth
Ba ttin
DISTRI CT 'J.
Miller ~ Coc o
Griset He r r in ~~0./\tv .,, ~
~-~ Hi r th
Smith . Hil em an
Batt in i/
'I STRI CT 11
v Coen
~
DI STRICT 8
Boyd ~ Goldberg
Mitche l l ~ Battin
Time District ~ J_O_I_N-TB_O_A_RD_S_ -~
Culve r v
Arbiso * Le wis Baum . Hog ard
B ert o n We s tra
Christie Root
Cl a r k ~ Magn u s
Davis Bou sm an
Step hen son ,:z-Du t ton
F i nne l l ~· Gomez Gibbs
Gree n Sh i ple y
Gr is e t · Herrin
Harvey --v:--Kane l
He rrin 17 Gris e t
Hirth \?" Croul
Hyde ~ Kroes e n J us t Har per
Mc I nnis Hirth
Mc vlhinne y
Mi lle r < Co c o
Pa r sons V
Po r t e r
~g e rS:
$t 1 ¥1¥1 ey
S i ms
Smith
We daa
Winn
Bat t i n
Hi rth
Coen
Zunig a
Hi l e man
Machado
Sc hni ep1
Mi t che l l 'O ,
Boyd }/ Go l db er~
OTHE RS
Ha r pe r
Br own Sy l veste_r __ _
Carl son
Cl a r k e
Du nn
F ins t er
Gal l o way
Hohener
Hunt
Ke i th
Lo wry
Maddox
Ma rt i n s on
Ni ss on
Pi ersall
Sigl e r
St evens
Cr abb
' .
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
April 14, 1971 -7:30 p.m.
WARRANT NO.
15216
15217
1-5218
15219
~1..5220
15521
15222
15223
15224
15525
15226
15227
15228
15229
15230
15231
15232
15233
15234
15235
15236
15237
15238
15239
15240
15241
15243
15244
15245
~-.521.J-6
15247
15248
15249
15250
15251
15252
15253
15254
15255
15256
15257
15258
15259
15260
15261
15262
15263
15264
15265
15266
15267
15268
15269
15270
5271
~5272
15273
15274·
15275
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Airport Service Inc., Bus Charter $
All Bearing Service, Inc., Pump Parts
City of Anaheim, Power
Anaheim Dodge, Truck Parts
Anaheim Truck & Transfer Co., Freight·
The Anchor Packing Co., Pump Packing
Azusa Western Inc., Concrete
Bank of America, Bond & Coupon Collections
Barksdale, Electrical Supplies
Battery Corp. of California, Batteries
Beacon Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
Bearing Specialty Co., Bearings
Beckr.-lan Instrumer~ts, Inc., PH Meter
Bell Pipe & Supply Co., Piping & Fittings
Bell's Radiator Service, Truck Repair
Jim Benzie~ Reimburse OJT Instruction
Bird Machine Co., Freight In
Blake, Moffitt & Towne, Janitorial Supplies
Blasius Electric True~, Truck Parts
Blower Paper Co., Maintenance Supplies
Bren~er -Fiedler & Assoc., -New Compressor
Bristol Park Medical Group, Pre-effiployment Exam
Charles Bruning Co., Drafting Supplies
C & R Reconditioning Co., Pump Pa~ts
Certified Laboratories, Inc., Solvents
Clow Corporation, Pump Parts ~
College Lumber Co., Inc., Small Hardware
Commercial & C. B. Communications, Communications Equip.
Consolidated Electrical Dist., Inc., Electrical Supplies
Control Specialists, Inc., Regulators
Copeland Motors Inc., Truck Parts
Costa Mesa Aut~ Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
Costa Mesa County Water Dist., Water
County of Orange, Feb. & Mar. Juv. Court Work Program
Charles P. Crowley Co., Small Hardware
Bob Currie, Reimburse OJT Instruction
DeGuelle & Son's Glass Co., Truck Repair
Dept. of Ge~1eral Services, Technical Manuals
Diesel Control Corp., EnGine Repair
Doubleday & Co., Inc., Reimburse OJT Manuals
Clar~ Dye Hardware, Small Hardware
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring
Engineers Sales-Service Co., Pump Parts
Enterprise Printing Co., Specification Covers
Fiberglass Specialties, Diffuser Plugs
Fischer & Porter Co., Controls
Foss Co~, Flotation Supplies
Fowler Equipment, Inc., Crane Rental
Edward R. Francis, Reimburse OJT Instruction
. City of Fullerton, Water
Garden Grove Lumber & Cement, Building Material
Gasket ~fg. Co., Gaskets
General Electric Supply Co., Electrical S~pplies
General Telephone Co.
Georgia-Pacific Corp., Chlorine
Gladman & Wallace, Truck Tires
Golden ~est Fertilizer Co., Grit ·Removal
Bob Gosche Co., Small Hardware
A-1
AMOUNT
65.00
209.65
25.00
423.37
199.80
471.51
250.53
1, 341. 33
276.59
141t. 59
25.87
51.60
1,178.10
376.49
22.00
150.00
37.27
4o.48
34. 61t
10.29
253.68
12.50
21.25
142.50
80.84
119.48
153.36
34.86
534.75
1,195.95
23.84
636.96
6.00
600.00
373.97
150.00
115.42
lt. 60
177.11
163.80
30.62
526.93
2,407.50
1,124.24
109.88
220.50
1,209.85
21.00
157.00
20.00
4.04
202.03
84.63
1,617.06
1,393.77
26,054.23
107.60
792.00
141.24
W_t\RRANT NO.
15276
15277
15278
15279
15280
1 .5281
~5282
15283
15284
15285
15286
15287
15288
15289
15290
15291
15292
15293
1529l~
15295
15296
15297
15298
15299
15300
15301
15302
15303
15304
15305
1-5306
~5307
15308
15309
15310
15311
15312
15313
15314
15315
15316
15317
15318
15319
15320
15321
15322
15323
15324
15325
15326
15327
15328
15329
15330 , 5~~1 .l.. ..J..J...L
~3332
5 ""'!-:;i~,
:).,):)
15334
15335
15336
IN FAVOR OF
Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Parts $
Hanson, Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester, Audit Services
Fred A. Harper, Various Mee-ting & C. 0 .D. Expense
William Hayden, Employee Mileage .
L. Heitman Equipment Co., Equip~ent Rental
Hertz Equipment Rental Corp., Equipment Rental
Paul J. Hogan, Employee Mileage
Honeywell, Inc., Strip Charts
Howard Supply Co., Piping, Valves & Small Hardware
City of Huntington Beach, Water
Ingersoll-Rand Co., Engine Parts
Irvine Ranch Water District, Water
Johnson Service Co., Pump Parts
Jones Chemicals, Inc., Small Hardware
Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Piping Supplies
Fred Keiser, Employee Mileage
H. R. Kelly Corp., Boiler Repair
Kelly Pipe Co., Pipe & Fittings
Keuffel & Esser Co., Reproduction Supplies
Fritz Kiene Office Machine, Equipment Maintenance
King Bearing, Inc.J Pump Parts, Bearings
Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts
Kleen-Line, Corp., Jar.itorial Supplies
Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Hardwar~
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies & Small Tools
L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Rental
The La cal Co., Inc., Pump Packing ,
Judy Lee, Employee Mileage
Howard P. Lembke,, Instrum.ent School (MO 6-10-70)
Leupold & Stevens, Inc., Telemetry Supplies
Ray E. Lewis, Engineers Conference (MO 6-10-70)
Los Angeles Type Founders, Inc., Printing Supplies
R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., Building Supplies
Engineering News Record, Technical Jour0al
Mesa Supply, Trunk Maintenance Supplies
~etermaster, Inc., Meter Repair
Metropolitan Supply Co., Small Hardware
Electrical Supplies
E. B. Mortiz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers
Jean Bankston Mosher, Employee Mileage (2 Mos.)
Herbert A. Moss, Special Labor Counsel Retainer
Jean Musick Corp., Communication Supplies
Nalco Chemical Co., Solvents
Nashua Corp., Reproduction Supplies
The National Cash Register Co., Program Changes
City of Newport Beach, Water
C. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel
Noland Paper Co., Inc., Reproduction Supplies
O. C. Suppliers, Inc. Small Hardware
Oakite Pr~ducts, Inc., Solvents
Orange County Boiler & Industrial Repair, Gaskets
Orange County Radiotelephone Service
Oranc;e County Starr.p Co., Rubber Stamp
Pacific Scientific Co.~ Meter
Pacific Telepho~e Co.
Pall Trinit-.y l•Iicro Corp., Compressor Parts
Postmaster, Postage
Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage
Pryor-Giggey Co., Buildil1g Material
The Register, Newspap2r
Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Steel
A-2
. AMOUNT
6.73
710.62
293.28
65.58
429.00
44.58
20. 55,
124.10
4,763.58
6.57
454.65
56.80
191.77
28.35
1,040.18
78.·54
690.83
512.58
439.41
60.00
580.25
408 .1~7
336.20
195.49
538.44
1,520.20
102.23
23.34
40.59
36.98
35.00
31.84
105.00
18.oo
l-t.62. 84
23.26
290.87
44.84
738.15
29.58
250.00
50.19
1181. 01
140.00
81.00
9.66
1,217.50
450.87
7.88
185.96
9.25
316.93
2.53
116.66
l~ 37. 52
09 r;8 ..; .......... '-
25 o. oo
44.82
80.64
16.50
267.52
WA?i.HANT NO.
15337
15338
15339
15340
15341
1-5342
~5343
15344
15345
15346
15347
15348
15349
15350
15351
15352
15353
15354
15355
15356
15357
15358
15359
15360
15361
15362
15363
15364
15365
15366
1-53 67
~5368
15369
15370
15371
15372
153'73
15374
15375
15376
15377
15378
15379
15380
IN FAVOR OF
Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Parts
Santa Ana Book Store, Inc., Technical Manuals
Santa Ana Electric Motors, New Motor
Sargent-Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies
Scott Regrigeration Service, Inc., Air Cond. Service
S. ·F. Serranti~10, Employee Mileage
The Sherwin-Williams Co., Paint & Supplies
A. H. Shipkey, Inc., Truck Tires
John E. Sigler, Employee Mileage
Signal-Flash Co., Inc., Barricade Rental
Singer-Friden Division, Postage Meter Rental
Snith Optical Service, Safety Glasses
Southern California Edison Co.,
Southern California Gas Co.
Southern Califor~la Water Co.
Southland Supply, Inc., Pesticides
Sparkletts, Bottled Water
Speed-E-Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Standard Oil :o., E~gine Oil & Gasoline
Gary G. Streed, Employee Mileage (6 Mos.)
Sully-Miller Contracting Co., Paving Su~plies
T & H· Equipment Co., Inc., Tractor Parts
C. O. Thompson Petroleum Co~, Solvents
Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Steel
Tustin Water Works, Water
Union Oil Co., Gasoline
Utilities Supply Co., Small Hardware~ .
Vaniman Camera, Photo Supplies & Processing
John R. Waples R.S., Odor Consultant
warren & Bailey ~o., Inc., Fittings
Uaukesha EntSir;e Servicenter, Inc., Engine Parts
Robert A. Webber, Employee Mileage
Western Highway Products, Inc., Traffic Control
Western Salt Co., Salt
Whitney's Speedometer Service, Equipment R~pair
John Williams, Reimburse OJT Mileage
~illiams Welding & Fabricating, Machining
Michael J. Wilso~, Employee Mileage
Wilson Engine & Equip;·,1ent Co., Engine Parts
Russ Wold, Employee Mileage
World Travel Bureau, Inc., Various Meetings
Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage
Xerox Corp., Reproduction & Installation
1971 CWPCA Palm Springs Conference Committee
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING
A-3
AMOUNT
$ 125.19
5~.55 57). 04
402.47
131. 75
15.00
317.54
235.12
28. 86
340.30
59.85
19.84
18,386.94
1,082.80
3.48
129.45
61.02
464.66
1,102.66
63.00
57.94
35.08
145.78
82.89
25.37
16.48
219.98
335.95
218.30
153.33
71.93
61.14
109.26
27.72
8.00
102.90
1,260.00
40.02
277.54
81.06
735.2c
84.54
501 .. 58
362.00
$ 98,049.90
WARRANT NO.
15381
15382
15383
15384
~5385
15386
15387
15388
15389
15390
15391
15392
15393
15394
15395
15396
15397
15398
~5399
CAPITAL OUTLP~Y REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
J. Baumhoefe~er & Sons,. Ltd., Site Prep J-12
John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Serv., -Plant Const.
Carollo & Keith, Engr. I-8
Daily Pilot, Bid Notice E-057
William P. Ficker, A.I.A., Architect Pl-6-1
General Electric Supply Co., Release Ret. Percent.
J. Putnam Henck, Contractor P2-17
Hewlett-Packard, Contractor J-llB
J.E. Hoagland & W.W. Hoagland, Contractor P2-5R-l
J.E. Hoagland & W.W. Hoagland, Contractor P2-16
Hood Corporation, Contractor Pl-15/P2-15
Peter Kiewit Sons' Co., Contractor J-10
Lynam-Wood Construction, Inc., Contractor P2-18
Maurseth-Howe-Lockwood & -Assoc., Investigate I-8
Near-Cal Corp., Contractcr J-11
Perkin-Elmer, Contractor J~llC
Twining Laboratories, Testing P2-18
Van Waters & Rogers, Contractor J-llA
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING
OCEAN OUTFALL #2
CONSTRUCTICN INSPECTION .REVO~VING FuND
iN FAVOR OF
Parker Diving Service, Inspection J-10
TOTAL INSPECTION REVOLVING
TOTAL JOINT WARRANTS
A-4
AMOUNT
$ 240.00
20,959.49
26,927.50
6.85
112.50
J4-A. 1,337.07
10,480.86
9,893.49
3,884.97
l_,015.70
.46,250.44
134_,220.00
15,592.28
12_,500.00
25,125.66
8,855.70
248.90
6,875.57
$ 324,526.98
$ 9,311.27
9,3:1.27
$ 431,888.15
..
WARRANT NO.
15400
15401
15402
15403
..,,..
15404
15405
i51+06
15407
15408
i51+09
15413
DISTRICT NOo 1
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
City of Santa Ana Finance Department, Construction
Project 1-11 $ 3, 269. 08
DISTRICT NO. 2
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Lowry and Associates, Engineering Services 2-14-1,
2-14-2 and 2-14-3
DISTRICT NO. 3
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Cook and Barletta, Inc., Contractor 3-15
County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County,
Inter-District Flow Charge
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services
3-16
3-12, 3-14,
Merco Construction Engineers, Inc., Contractor 3-12
Osborne Laboratories, Inq., Pipe Testing 3-14
J. L. Scott Company, Contractor 3-13
DISTRICTS NOSo 3 & 11
SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Survey-Design 3-17
DISTRICT NO. 5
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Shu.irman-Simpson, Engineering Annex #4
City of Newport Beach, First Qtr. Conn. Chg. Adm.
-B-
$ 91,159.00
$ 6,525.87
478.15
$ 7,004.02
$ 8,573.50
27,324.oo
1,056.75
22,821.00
$ 59,775.25
$ 66,779.27
$ 2,167.50
$ 171.50
3, 26J.t .. 00
$ 3,435.00
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
15410 Shuirman-Simpson, Engineering, Big Canyon Relocation $
AMOUNT
100.00
~A11
15412
15414
15415
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Bayside Village, Easement Rent 5-18
Daily Pilot, Bid Notice 5-12B
Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Pipe Inspection
Zurn Engineers, Contractor 5-18
-B-1-
$ 999.90
10.00
992.50
6,266.34
$ 8,268.74
$ ll,803.74
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRAHT NO. IN. FAVOR OF AMOUNT
15416 Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services, Plan Check
and Inpsection $ 300.00
15417
15418
15419
15420
15421
15422
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Plaza Drive Sub-Trunk $ 217.00
DISTRICTS NOS. 1 & 7
SUSPENSE FUND WA~t\ANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Alladdin Litho, Plans and Specs 7-6-2
Southern Calif. Edison Company, Utility Relocation
7-6-1 . .
Wallace Trade Bindery Co., Plans and Specs 7-6-2
Boyle Engineering, Engineering 1-12
The Tustin News, Bid Notice 7-6-2
-c-
$ 517.00
$ 28.00
1,572.57
93.74
8,309.00
56.84
$ 10,060.15
COUI\TY ~.;IaT:1TIOl~ DISTRICTS OF OR.~HGE COUh"TY
P. O. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue
Fount~in Valley, California 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C .O. NO • __ 5...___
cor,~TRJ;.CTOR: ,J F,. Hoar;; land &.J:L. w I Hoagland DATE: Aoril 14, 1971
JOB: S~ciimPntation Basin J & Dj~ester J at Plant No, 2, Job No, P2-16
Amount of this change order (ADD) (D.E.UUCA.1) $ 428.00 -~~-
In acco:rdance \d th contract provisions, the following changes in the
._.,.contract and/or contract \·JOrk are hereby authorized and as compensation
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price
are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Contractor's letters dated May 4, 1970, May 5, 1970,
May 11, 1970, June 24, 1970, June 29, 1970, July 2,
1970, July 2, 1970, July 13, 1970, July 23, 1970,
September 24, 1970, October 20, 1970, March 23, 1971~
Districts' letters· dated April 30, 1970, ~ay 8, 1970,
Hay 22, 1970, May 27, 1970, June 18, 1970, July 20,
1970, October 13, 1970, November 3, 1970 and f\·~arch 24,
1971. And .•. Plan Sheets 13, Rev. 1, 18, Rev. 1, 20,
Rev. 1, 22, Rev. 1 and Drawing 13-A.
ADD
Extend supports for and relocate digester gas balance pipe
bet~een Digester I and J. ADD $
TOTAL ADD $
EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME:
~-Extra 1-Iork:
-Add stair landing
-Removal of undisclosed concrete
closure
-Alteration to prestressed walkway
and associated pipe relocation
-Installed added manhole on Digester
-Relocation of and revise piping and
electrical service for magnetic
flow meter and density meter ab
raw sludge pump station
-Install widened bridges across
Lindstrom Tunnel
B. Labor Disputes:
-Strike at manufacturer of Sedimen-
tation Basin mechanism and
digester heat .system equipment
-Laborer's strike
c. Acts of Districts
1 day
2 days
2 days
2 day~
2 days
15 days
20 days
2 days
-Delays in filling Sedimentation
Ba.sin and cor..necti0n delays cJue t.o
onerationaJ reauirements of the
Treatment Facilities. 25 days
-1..:.
428.00
h28.oo
Agenda Item #lla D-1 All Districts
(Continued}
cou::TY s.~~;J~TNl'IC~f DI:3 1i·1UCT~3 O.? OP:A)::G:.: cou:;r.r'[
P. 0. l:OX 51'/5 -102<':lt Ellis ~\venue
~~ount~~in V.::.lllcy .> Cali!'crnia 92708
CHi\ITGE OHDER
C :o. iiO. 5-Continued
CONTlv\CTOR: J, E. }Joagland & H. W. Hoagland DATE: Anril 14. 1971
JOB: Sedimentation Basin J & Digester J at Plant No. 2, ·Job No. P2-16
flmount of this cl1an~e order (ADD) (JJK1J_IJX;X') $ __ 4_2_8 ___ . o_o __
In accordance 1·1i th contract provisions, the follo\'Jing changes in the
contract nnd/or contrnct 1•,'ork are hereby authorized and as compensn tion
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price
are hereby approved.
Extension of Contract Time ••.•. Continued
D. ·rnclement weather and wet conditions ·9 days
TOTAL EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME •••• 80 calendar days
sm.-:MARY OF CONTRACT TIME:
Original
Original
Original
Contract
II
Contract Date ·
Contract Time
Contract.'Completion Date
m• ~ t ·o c 0 ~4 11me .:..x ensi ns ,·, • .1r
II II • t Thi s c t 0 •
Total Contract Time Extension
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
March 26, 1970
270 ~alendar day~·
December 21, 1970
20 calendar days
80 calendar days
100 calendar days
370 calendar days
March 31, 1971
Original Contract Price $ 587,700. 00
$ 11,891.10
$ 428.00
$ 600, 019 • 10
Prev. _t\uth. Changes c. o .1, 3,
& 4, .. adds
This Change (ADD) (:Ot~·mxxr)
Amended Contract Price
==-======================:==============================================--------~--~~---
"-"'oard authorization date:
April 14, 1971
JOrtN CAROLLO ENGINEERS
A~enda Item #lla D-2
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By /s/ Paul G. Brown
~~----~~~~~~~~--~~~~~
J. E.
Chj_cf Engir.ccr
HOAGLAND & W. W. HOAGLAND
By
~--~-----~----~~~--------~--
All Districts
RESOLUTION NO. 71-42
ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-16 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDSOF DIRECTOP.S
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. P2-16
AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
**~-*****
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6_,. 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE_, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. Tha.t the contractor, J. E. Hoagland and W. W.
Hoagland, has completed the construction in accordance with the
terms of the contra.ct for Sedimentation Basin "J 11 and Digester
"J" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-16, on the 31st day of March,
1971; and,
Section 2.· That by letter, Distircts 1 Deputy Chief Engineer
.
has recommended a.ccepta11ce of said work a.s having been completed
in accordance with the terms of the contra.ct; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the ·District has
concurred in said engineers' :recommenda.tion, which said recommendation
is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That the Sedimentation Ba.sin 11 J 11 and Digester 11 J 11
a.t Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-16, is hereby accepted a.s completed in
accordance with the terms of the contra.ct therefor, dated March
26, 1970; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby
authorized and directed to execute a. Notice of Completion
therefor.
PASSED AND ADOPTED a.t a regular meeting April 14, 1971.
Acenda Item #llb -E-All Districts
cou::TY S.'\7GT: .. ~~~u~; DI:~'~·?ICTS OF Oi<f1;!G2 COUi~TY
p. 0. EO:< 5l'l5 -ioc:~h Ellis i\ '/Cr!UC
~ount~in VQllcy, California 92708
ClU\HGE OHDER
C :o. NO. 1
~~~~~~-~~--
COUTH1\CTOR: J, PUTNAM HENCK, A CORPORATION D .. t\ TE: Aoril 14, 1971
JOB: Sedimentation Basin 11 K 11 & Digester trK" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-17
Amount of this chanGe order (l\DD) (DEDUCT) $ -0-----...,,,,.,
In accordance \·Jith contract provisions, the foll01·Jing cl1anges in the
contra.ct and/or contract work arc hereby authorized and as compensation
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract pric~
are hereby approved.
REFEHENCE: Environmental Protection Agency directive for
PL84-660 Water Pollution Control Projects.
The~follmdng statement will be incorporated into Section 9 of
the Specifications:
"Bypassing of untreated or partially· treated
~astewaters to surface waters or drainage
courses ;'Jill not be permitted. All treatment
processes vJill remain in continuous and full.
aper? ti on during cons true ti on".
. .
}oard authorization date:
""-""
Original Contract Pr lee
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Chanc;e (ADD) (DEDUCT)
Amended Contract Price
Approved:
$
$
$
$
·1,164,540.00
-0-
-0-
1,164,540.00
April 14, 1971 COUUTY S/1iTITATION DISTRICTS of
Oran3e County, California
By /s/ Paul G. Brown .. ------·----
JOHH CAROLLO ENGINEERS .
. Chief Enrj.nccr
J .. PUTNAM HENCK,·A CORPORATI01-l
By
~~----------~----~---------By
~~~~----~--~~----~----~---
A~enda Item #llc -F-A11 Districts
RESOLUTION NO. 71-43
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
JOB NO. P2-19
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF' ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR SEDIMENTATION BASINS "L" AND 11 M11 AND
DIGESTERS "L" AND "M" AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB
NO. P2-19
* * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RES OL \lE _, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and
contra.ct doclUilents this da.y submitted to the Boards of Directors
by John Carollo Engineers, Districts' engineers, for construction
of Sedimentation Basins "L" and "M" and Digesters "L" and "M''
at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-19, are hereby approved and adopted;
and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be ·authorized and directed
to advertise for bids for said work pursuant io the provisions
of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California.; and,
Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m.,
Ma.y 18, 1971, at which time said bids will be publicly opened
and read; and,
Section 4. That the secretary of the Board and the
Districts' Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf
of the Boa.rd of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED a.t a. regular meeting April 14, 1971.
Agenda Item #lld -G-A11 Districts
JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS
PHOENIX • LAFAYETTE • SANTA ANA • El PASO
TEXAS ARIZONA
JOHN A. CAROLLO, P. E.
H. HARVEY HUNT, P. E.
HOWARD M. WAY. P. E.
ROBERT G WlLLl~MS. P. E.
DONALD R. PREISLER. P. E.
March 26,, 1971
lfir. Fred A. Harr-er, General 1:an-~ger
CALIFORNIA
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P. o. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject: Ocean Outfall No. 2, hla.rine Section
3690 MT. OIA8LO BOULEVARD
LAFAYETTE, CALIF. 94549
AREA CODE: (41!5) 283-3895
Reply to:
P. o. Box 528
Huntington Beach
California 92648
. Attached you will fir:.d a letter fro~ ·Feter Kiewit Sons' Compury
requesting three ( 3) days extent.ion of ti:rr..e for dO'la.y due to high ocean
swells and choppy seas caused 'bJ winds.
We recoranend approval of three (3 j days extention of ti:::.e for
February 26, Larch 1 and l.:a.rch 2, 1971 in a.ccorc:.ance with Section 6-3
of the General Provisions of the Sfecifications.
The Contractor has requested a total of seventy-eight (78) days
extention of ti~e of which we have recor.:ruended approval o-f seventy-six (76)
days extention through Karch 25, 1971.
WAB:wb
Enclosure
A,0"e11d~ TtDrn -ll-11° . -, • '-"· ~ ~,, -TT ·--H-
Very truly yours,
-JOHN C .. l\J."t:{OLL ENG IN.t..ERS ..
/i?t /Jlfl,!Jrf;f ·
Walter A. Bishop Jro
Resident Ensineer
All Djstrj_cts
.__.,.
PETER KIEWIT SONS' CO.
CONTRACTORS
ESTABLISHED 1884
MAIN OFFICE: OMAHA, NEBR. 68131
1000 KIEWIT PL.AZA
ADDRESS RF.PLY TO:
P.O. Box 552
John Carollo Engineers
P .o. Box 528
Huntington Beach, Ca 92648
Huntington Beach, Ca 926li8
March 5, 1971
Ati:n: }!r. llalter A. Bishop-Resident Engineer
Re: Request for extension of time
Gentlemen:
In accordance :-ri th the general provisions of the specifications Section 6,
paragra~::'h 3, we respectrull~r reouest an extensi.on of the cDntract tirr.e for
three (3) days because of weather delays (high ocean ~nells & choppy seas
due to uinds) on Friday, Nonday & Tuesday, February 26, l·Iarch 1 & 2, 1971.
Because of these swells & seas we were una'Jle to work on Friday & Honday,
and on Tuesda:r, t..he crew ~ent the shift repairinG da:r.lage caused 'bJ the
adverse ocean conditions.
cc: File
District
Agenda Item #lle -I-
Very truly yours,
Peter Kie~it Sons' Co~
J . -c 1·\.
tft1,,tf W i .•
ohn Ford Jr.
All Districts
CC'UU'l'Y ~:i..'.H\lT?.'l'J_l'f~ JJ10'.!.'.K.iC'.L'~ UY UKJ'.\I;Gt; CUUN'l'Y
P. 0. BOX 5175 -10244 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
_CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. 7
----~----.--
CONTR~.CTOR: Peter KieNi t Sons' Company DATE: April 14, 1971
JOB: Ocean Outfall No. 2 -I·1arine Section, Job No. J-10
Amount of this change order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ __ n_o_n_e ___ _
,_,. In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the
contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as corr:pensation
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price
are hereby approved.
REFEREHCE: Contractor's letters of December 7, 1970, January 8, February 24,
·and March 5, 1971 and Engineer's letters of January 4, Febru-
ary 2, March 2 and Narch 26, 1971.
Abnormal Force of
Nov. 30, 1970
Dec. 2,3,9,21
Jan. 5 1971
Feb. lB, i911
Feb. 26; March
EXTENSION
Elements
and 22, 1970
1 and 2, 1971
OF TIME
Days
1
5
·l
1
·3
TOTAL 11
. Original operational completion date:
Original final completion date:
~operational completion date with Change Orders
Nos. 1, 2, 5, and 6 (65 calendar days): .
Final cc~pletion date with Change Orders Nos. 1,
2, 5, and 6 (65 qalendar days):
Ooerational comoletion date with this
-extension of-time (11 days):
Final co~nletion date with this extension
of time (11 days):
Board authorization date:
Original Contract Price
ADD
Prev. Auth. Chan(Ses DEDUCT
This Change (ADD)(DEDUCT)
Amended Contract Price
Approved:
January 16, 1971
March 17, 1971
l·~arch 22, 1971
May 21, 1971
April 2, 1971
June 1, 1971
$ 8,94~,oo~
,390.07
$ __ ].£.,. 000. 00
$ . ·none
~ April 14, 1971 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By /s/ Paul G. Brown
Chief Eneinecr
JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS PETER KIEWIT SONS' COMPANY
A~er.d~ Item #~le -J-All Di.stricts
Agenda Item No. 8
PETER KIEWIT SONS' CO.
M>.IN OFFICE: OMAHA 31, N EDR.
1000 KIEWIT PLAZA
CONTRACTORS
ESTABLISH ED 1884
County Sci..nitation Districts of Orcu-1ge County
P.O. Box 5175
Fountain Valle~r' Ca 92708
Attn: Hr. Fred Harper -General Hanager
ADDRESS REPLY TO:
P.O. Box 552
Huntin3t.on Beach, Ca 926Ii'tr
August 2 7, 1970
Re: Contract for Construction of Ocea.T'l Outfall l/2 Harine Section, c..T ob #J-10
SUBJECT: Forr:ial Protest on Final Decision by the Engineer.
Gentle;nen:
Please ref eT·ence the fo1lo.,·Ting letters resardinr; the Contractor' s c1 cii:;i for an
equitable adjustr:~.~nt in contract 9rice and tir.ie for additional rrorl= req~ired
of the Cont~actor due to unanticipated foundation scour ;::~ound the pipes:
1. Contractor's July J.1, 1910 letter
2. Engineer's July 16, 1970 letter
3. Contracto:-1 s July 16, 1970 letter L. t::ontractor' 0 August 17, 1970 letter
5. Engineer 1 s August 19, 1970 letter
The follo;rin~ is a brief su..1~rnar.r of circumstances and activities that have· occurred
since July 3, 1970.
On this date the Contractor found excessive settlement of a· pre-;iously laid series
of pipe, causing pipe joint rr.ove!:'lent :LT'l varying degrees, includine conplete separ-
ation of one joint. This circur.istance required conplete removal and reinstalla tion
of the affected pipes.
Subsequent to this, and continuing until August 7, 1070, the Contracto1 .. atte::-.pted
to install pipe in the previously-~pproved manner (i.e~, laying on the ocean floor).
During this period the Contractor observed foundation scour occurring around newly
laid pipes; the extent of scour arid the period of time inwlved for scour to occur
being very errat:i.c.
In oroer to prevent or alleviate this scour problen the Contractor was forced to
place i: stabili~ation rockn on the ne-;·rly laid pipeline on an interr.tl ttent t~~e
basis, depcnde~t upon the scour characteristics in each case. This operation
was not anticipated by t.1-ie Contractor or by the contract docuncI1ts prior to bid,
a.rid therofore, the Contr.'1ctor ::-.ain~ains that he is entitled to rci."1bursemcnt for
his costs for thc~e uni'oreGcen activities, and all related activlties pertai:riJ.ng
to this situati0n.
As end e 1 tsr:1 /il2 K-1 All Districts
..
-2-
As in:licated in the Contractor's letters of July J1 and August 17, 1970, the
entire scope a.'1d co st of these operations uere indctermina te at the time, as
the situation was occurri.1L3 on a continuous basis. It now appears that this
remedial work has been accomplished -as of August 20, 1970 and therefore the
recap of all costs and ti.Tile can now be made. This will be done, and forwarded
to the District at an early date.
As indicated in the letters from the Engineer, dated July 16, 1970 and August 19,
1970, a final decision has been given by the Engineer. In accordance ui th General
Provision 8-4 Forr.1al Protest, the Contractor hereby protests the final decision by
the Engineer. A final decision by the Board of Directors is requested as provided
for in referenced General Provision 8-4.
cc: ·walter Bishop
JF/gb
Agenda. Item #12
Very truly yoflrs,
Peter Kiew:i. t Sons' Co.
() i7 -1 /}/ ,/ --1.1/ / :;
V[;i..i.. -~,·"' ,.,/ ~
J'ohn Ford, Jr.
' /Project Sup'.3rinter:rlent
'/ l,
K r--c All Districts
PETER li\IEVVIT SONS' CO.
" , .. ''· . CONTflACTOHS :
I / J' -
FOOT OF SDU.:fH 26TH STREET
. P. O. BOX 1512 ·;
I
RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA 94802
PHONE 232·8477
March 29, 1971
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention: Mr. Fred A. Harper
General Manager
·Reference: Contract for Construction of Ocean Outfall No. 2 -
Marine Section, Job No. J -10
Contractor's Claim re Scour Conditions
Gentlemen:
We refer to ·our claim presented by letters dated July 16, Augu.st 17 and
.August 25, 1970, covering the ocean floor scour conditions encountered in
connection with our performance of subject contract, and particularly \Vith
respect to the scour conditions therein described and as to which we have
held several conferences.
As heretofore covered in our correspondence with you, we present herewith
our detailed claim covering the costs to us of over-·coming the referenced
condition. The total amount of our claim with respect to such costs is
$477, 072. 04.
This confirms that representatives of this comp·any will meet with you and
the counsel for the Districts on April 5, 1971, to discuss possible settlement
of our claim.
We appreciate the courtesies you have extended in the past and the opportunity
to.meet with you for a review of th~s matter.
NLB:ts
Enclosures
A d It ./tL12 gen a. .. em 11
Very truly yours,
PETER KlE\VIT SONS' CO. "'Y-~---, ~~t(._A•./l.·~
N. L. Barnes
L-1 All Districts
PIPE REMOVAL, RE-SETTING, AND ROCK PROTECTION
DUE TO SCOUR CONDITIONS
Pipe laying had progressed by July 2 to a point where pipe were being placed
directly on the ocean floor. At the completion qf the second shift, July 2,, the
pipe had been laid within specified joint tolerances to pipe joint No. 320. The
last pipe bedded with rock was pipe No. 305.
After remedial work on the manhole of the existing 78" line on July 3, pipe No.
320 was found to be disjointed, and during the second shift pipe No. 306 joint
was found to have opened. On July 6 further inspection of joint No. 306 showed
it to be disjointed. We then proceeded to remove the fifteen pipe affected by
scour between pipe No. 320 and pipe No. 305. After removal of these pipe they
were re-laid,, ·using 11 E" rock under the pipe for bedding and along the sides of
the pipe for scour protection. After the ·joints were reset then we continued
laying pipe with this method of placing ''E'' rock along ~he sides of the pipe for
scour protection.·
. ~ .
When the first scour occurred the oc.ean bottom was !lard enough to support the
pipe on the bells. This left a gap between the barrels and the bottom, and the
bottom scoured out along and under the barrel of the pipe. As we progressed
laying and rocking the pipe for scour protection we kept a constant check on the
bottom for scour conditions. When we placed pipe on a relatively soft ocean
bottom a different scour action occurred. Even though the barrels of the pipe
were supported, scour would occur five to six feet in-sho~e of the bells, de-
veloping a cavity that would enlarge itself forward to the bell, allowing the pipe
to settle.
On August 6 the inspector divers reported that scour was occurring in the vicinity
of pipe joint No. 420. At this time we had pipe laid to pipe joint No. 452.
On Saturday, August 8, we used our diver from a tug and checked at various points
from pipe No. 320 to the end of the line, pipe No. 463. We found evidence of scour
where the protective scour rock had been placed and that several joints had settled.
We immediately commenced placing additional rock along side of previously placed
pipe, which we completed on August 20.
On September 10 ·and 17 the scour rock interf erred with the placing of the rock
sled.
On February 4 we opened up manhole No. 13 and 14 for the diver inspectors to check
the inside pipe gaps of pipe in the heavy scour area.
On February 22 we opened up manhole No. 15 for inspect'ion of joints No. 411 and 412.
Due to the scour conditions,, remedial work was necessary on both of these joints.
Agenda Item #12 L-2 All Districts
·JOHN CAl=lOLLO ENGBNEEE=lS
PHOENIX
ARIZONA
JOHN A. CAROLLO. P. E.
H. HARVEY HUNT. P E.
HOWARD M. WAY. P. E.
ROBERT G. WILLl~MS. P. E.
DONALD R. PREISLER. P. E.
LAFAYETTE • SANTA ANA
CALIFORNIA
• EL PASO
TEXAS
3690 MT. OIABLO BOULEVARD
LAFAYETTE, CALIF. 94549
AREA CODE: (415) 283-389S
April 7, 1971
Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager
County Sanitation Dif?tricts of Orange .County
P. O. Box 8127
Fount~in.Valley, California 92708
Subject: Ocean Outfall No. 2 -Marine Section -Job No. J-10
we· recommend denial of the claim by Peter Klewit Sons 1
Company dated March 29, 1971.
This recommendation ls in accordance ~·rith our previous
recommendation contained in our letter of September 9, 1970.
We quote from this earlier letter:
"The plans and specifications as written
are a "framework" or ''guidelines 11 within· which
the contractor must operate. As much leaway as
possible is allowed within this framework, so
that the contractor can use ingenuity, new concepts,
etc., to accomplish the work required at the least
cost to the client. However, it is our job to see
that the finished product is safe, reliable, and
meets all of the requirements or nis within the
.framework" of our design concepts.
"The contractor 1 s ·statement of his August 27th
letter, that he. "attempted to install pipe in the
previously-approved manner", in paragraph 4, can
only refer to the fact that his method of installing
the p~pe was not disapproved. We did consider his
method of installing the pipe to be within the
"framework" of our specifications.
"In the following paragraph of the contractor's
letter on the 27th, he states that the scour problem
forced him to place "stabilization rock'.' in an
operation "not anticipated by the contractor or by
the contract documents". We point out again, ~s we
Agenda. Item f/12 M-1 All Districts
Mr. Fred A.· Harper
April 7, 1971 -2..:
did at the pre-construction conference on November 22,
1968, that section of the specifications entitled
"Section 11-1 Progress Payments", which is quoted
below: ·
"Pipeline work must be fully.completed,
including sheet piling ~here applicable,
excavation, pipe installation and testing,
backfill and quarry stone placement, :before
it will be included in the progress payments."
"This specification is the type calling for a
finished product; therefore, no payment is made prior
to completion of the pipeline in place, including
the protective rock. We did anticipate problems
in construction of the pipe and therefore, we do
not allow payment until the pipe is in place, with
the full section of protecting rock in place, adjacent
to and/or over the pipe. The method chosen to install
the pipe and rock was to be selected by the contractor.
"The "stabilization rock" referred to by the
contractor is part of the final iock protection of
the pipe required by the plans and specifications.
The method of achieving the rock protection called
for in the plans and specifications is at the con-
.. tr~ctor's discretion, as long as he stays within
the "frame~·rnrk" of the specifications.
A 1 Item ·#'i2 gene a. _ _ M-2 All° D1stricts
.. Mr. Fred K~ Harper
April 7~ 1971 -3-•.
"Inasmuch as the contractor is accomplishing
the final product as called for in the specifica-
tions, we can see n6 reason why he should be
entitled to any extra time or payment. Again,
we ~econunend you deny this claim."
HHH :jb
-.
•I
JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS
~~/,'/'!..a--~ -~,~ ............. ~ / .~ / ... ,...,, .-v • ~t~/t?': .. /'~;L.7'! '/-{;..
Walter A. Bishop '
~~~ ~ H~~H\ill+
Agenda. Item #12 r.l-3 All Districts
CLARK MILLER
C. ARTHUR NISSON
"-" NELSON KOGLER
H. L,t..WSON MEAD
MILLER. NISSON S KOGLER
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
2014 NORTH BROADWAY
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706
April
13th
1 9 7 1
The Boards of Directors of
County Sanitation Districts 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 and 11
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Re Contract No. JlO
Peter Kiewit Sons' Co.
Gentlemen:
(Marine Section Ocean Outfall No. 2)
Claim for Extra Compensation Due to
Scour Conditions $477,072.04
This claim is based upon letters from the
contractor dated August 17 and 27, 1970,· and March 29,
1971, together with supporting data.
An inves.tigation of the factual background
reveals that certain ultimate facts are in dispute.
Briefly put, the questions are as follows~
1. Whether or not certain statements
made in the Report on Soils Investigation
dated May 22, 1968, constituted a positive
and material representation as to a condition
or conditions presumably within the knowledge
of the districts which the contractor had a
right to rely on.
2. Whether or not the districts or their
engineers had knowledge of a "scouring" effect
likely to be encountered in the areas in ques-
tion through previous construction or investiga-
tion experience which should have been revealed
to the contractor by additional specifications
prior to receiving its bid.
3. Whether or not any statements in the
specifications or supportirgreports such as
the Report on Soils Investigation were made
in good faith only as suggestions a~ distinguished
from a warranty of conditions to be found on the
job.
Agenda Item #12 N-1 All Districts
TELEPHONE
542-6771
#2 Boards ot Directors of
Districts 1 , . . 2 , 3 , . 5 , 6 , 7 & 11
April 13, 1971
If the last question in the preceding paragraph
is answered affirmatively, such expenses caused to the
contractor by unforeseen conditions would then be a risk
to be assumed by the contractor. See, Wunderlich v. State
of California, 65 Cal. 2d, 777 (1967).
It is believed that we have sufficient facts to
prove that the position of the Districts as represe~ted in
the specifications and by its engineers were a full, frank
and complete disclosure of all information reasonably avail-
able or known to the District or its engineers. It is
·believed that any supporting data and additional information
was given only as suggestions made in good faith for the bene-
fit of those contractors bidding on the project. The manner
in which the contract was executed was left up to the contrac~or
and the engineers and the Districts did not exercise dominion
or control of the manner in which the contractor went about
completing the project.
It is recommended that the claim be denied. Con-
tractor represents that upon denial it does intend to file a
lawsuit. No reasonable basis for settlement has been dis-
covered after conference with the engineer 1 s staff and con-
tractor. It should be pointed out that the federal government
is participating in this project to the extent of 33-1/3%.
If we should suffer a judgment as a result of the lawsuit,
there is some question as to whether or not the federal govern-
ment would participate in "the payment of the judgment in any
amount at all.
Agenda Item #12
Respectfully submitted,
C. Arthur Nissan
General Counsel
N-2 All Districts
RESOLUTION NO. 71-44-1
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF CORPORATION
GRANT DEED
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
ACCEP~CANCE OF CORPORATION GRANT DEED
FROM LEVITT AND SONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
****•****
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Corporation Grant Deed,
dated March 10, 1971, wherein LEVITT AND SONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
grants to County Sanitation District No. 1, fee ovmership for
sevrer purposes. for that property situated in the County of Orange,
State of Ca.lifornio., in coilnection with Dy~r Road trunk, is hereby
approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the real property over which said easement
is granted is more particularly described as follows:
The Northerly 20~00 feet of Lots 20 through 36 inclusive
in Tract No. 7149, per map rec1J:r.>ded in Book 271, pages
45 through 47 inclusive of .Miscellaneous Maps, Records
of Orange County, California.
Section 3o That s~id Corporation Grant Deed is accepted
at no cost to the District; and,
Section 4o That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be
authorized and directed to record said Corporation Grant Deed in
the Official Records of Orange County, California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1971.
Agenda Item #17 -0-District 1
RESOLUTION NO. 71-45-1
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTAr-!CE OF .CORPORATION
GHANT DEED
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OP COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
ACCEPTANCE OF CORPORATION GRANT DEED
FROM LEVITT AND SONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
* * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1,
of Orange County, California
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Corporation Grant Deed,
dated March 10, 1971, wherein LEVITT AND SONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
grants to County Sanitation District No. 1, fee ownership for
sewer purposes for that property situated in the County of Orange,
State of Ca.lifornia, in connection with Dyer Road trunk, is hereby
approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the real property over which said easement
is granted is more particularly described as follows:
The Northerly 20.00 feet of Lots 40 through 54 inclusive
in Tract No. 6906, per map recorded in Book 272, pages 12
through 14 inclusive of Miscellaneous Maps, records of
Orange County, California. ·
Section 3. That said Corporation Grant Deed is accepted
at no cost to the District; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be
authorized a.nd directed to record said Corporation Grant Deed in
the Official Records of Orange County, California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1971.
Agenda Item #17 -P-District 1
RESOLUTION NO. 71-46-5
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
ACCEPTANCE AND EXECUTION OF EASEMENT
FROM THE IRVINE COMPANY
*****-***
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5,
of Orange Cou~ty, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement, dated
March 8, 1971, wherein The Irvine Company, a corporation, grants
to County Sanitation District No. 5, a permanent easement for
sewer purposes situated in the County of Orange, State of
California, in connection with Sewer Trunk "B" -Unit 7,
Upper Newport Bay Crossing, Contra.~t ·No. 5-18, is hereby
approved, accepted and authorized for execution by the Chairman
of the Board; and,
Section 2o That the real property over which said easement
is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibitf>
"A" and "B", attached hereto and made a. pa.rt hereof; and,
Section 3o That said Grant of Easement is accepted at
no cost to the District; and,
Section 4o That the Secretary of the Boa.rd of Directors
be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the
Official Records of Orange County, California.
PASSED AND ADOP'rED a.t a. regular meeting held April 14, 1971.
Agenda. Item #22 -Q-District 5
B I D
Engineer's Estimate $16,000.
T A B U L A T I 0 N
S H E E T
Date April 6, 1971
11:00 a.m.
Contract For:
1.
2.
3.
SEWAGE PUMP AND DRIVE SHAFT, BAY BRIDGE PUMPING STATION
c.TOB NO. 5-12B
CONTRACTOR
Fairbanks Morse, Inc.
Pump Division
3601 Kansas Avenue
Kansas City, Kansas 66110
Healy Tibbitts
1400 W. 7th Street
Long Beach, Calif. 90813
Worthington Corporation
1060 S. Vail Ave.
Montebello, Calif. 90640
Sales Tax
TOTAL BID
$ 13,504.oo
675.20
$ 14,179.20
NO BID
NO BID
In addition to the above bidders, requests for bids were
mailed to the following suppliers:
1. Kirst Pump Co., 3322 E. Florence Ave .. , Huntington Park, Calif.
2. John W. Stang Corp., 767 N. Main St., Orange, Calif.
3. Allis-Chalmers, 6820 E. Washington Blvd., Los Angeles, Calif.
l+. Herman--Phinney-Kodmur, 3607 Seneca Ave., Los Angeles, Calif.
5. Ecco Contractors Inc., 1417 N. Harper, Santa Ana, Calif.
6. Pylon, Inc., Engineering Contractors, P.O. Box 4729, Compton,
Calif.
It is recommended tha.t award be ma.de to Fairbanks Morse, Inc.,
Pump Division, 3601 Kansas Avenue, Kansas City, Kansas 66110,
as the best bidder.
Wm. N. Clarke
Maintenance Superintendent
AfSenda: Item #23 -R-District 5
RESOLUTION NO. 71-51-5
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. 5-12B
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION.DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR
SEWAGE PUMP AND DRIVE SHAFT, BAY BRIDGE
PUMPING STATION, JOB NO. 5-12B
* * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day
submitted to the Board of Directors by the Districts' Maintenance
Superintendent, that award of contract be made to FAIRBANKS
MORSE, INC., PUMP DIVISION for Sewage Pump and Drive Shaft,
Bay Bridge Pumping Station, Job No. 5-12B, and the tabulation
of bids and the proposal for said work, are hereby received and
ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That contract for said Job No. 5-12B, is hereby
awarded to FAIRBANKS MORSE, INC., PUMP DIVISION, in the total
amount of $14,179.20, in accordance with the terms of their bid
and the prices contained therein; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
District a.re hereby authorized and directed to enter into and
sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to
the specifications and contract documents therefor; and,
Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are
hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the
unsuccessful bidders.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1971.
Agenda. Item #23 -S-District 5
v V 1..J o t .J. .l .._; • ~ ', ..l .I...'> ..l .!. v • • J.J ...L •.) .l. .!. \ ..L \,., .L •) V .I.' V .l \.:; L • 'J ~ . ..1 '-V V ~I J. .1.
P. 0. BOX 5175 -102~~h Ellis l~ '/enue
Fount~in Valley, California 92708
CJIJdIGE ORDER
CONTIV\CTOR: Cook & Barletta, Inc. Dl\TE:lill..ril 14, 1971
JOB: Miller Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole Repair, Contract No. 3-15
Amount of this chanrse order (ADD)" (~) $ 2,500.00
.._, In accordance ~,.Ji th contract provisions, the folloi·Jing changes in the
contract and/or contract '·Jork are hereby authorized and as compensation
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price
are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Contractor's letter to District dated 2 March 71, and·
District's letter to Contractor dated 9 March 71.
Contractor was directed to repair the 111anhole structure at
the intersection of Westminster & Edwards (Sta. 617+99.50),
complete in place for the total price of_ $2500.00. ·
EXTENSION OF TIME:
An extension of time of 21 days is hereby granted for the
above work.
TOTAL •••••••••••• ·• • • • • • • • 21 calendar days
SUMMARY:
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension from C.0.#1
Time Extension from.C.0.#2.
Time Extension from C.0.#3
Time Extension from this C.0.#4
Revised Completion Date
23 October 69
340 calendar days
28 September 70
28 calenoar days
28 calendar days
210 ca~endar days
21 calendar days
12 July 71
.-
Original Contract Prlce $ 79,,742.00 I
Board authorization date:
~ April 14, 1971
Agenda. Item #37
Prev. .11 uth. Ch3nges Add. ,#1 $ 3,703.26
This Chane;e (A DD) (4l1}'.0Utxr9 $ 2,500.00
Amended Contract Price $ 85,945026
-T·-
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California ·
By /s/ Paul G. Bro~n
Chi.cf Ene).nccr
District 3
RESOLUTION NO. 71-47-3
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
CONTRACT NO. 3-16
A F\ESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR BEACH ~RELIEF TRUNK SEWER,
REACHES 17, 18, AND 19, FROM ROSTRATA AVENUE
TO ROSECRANS AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 3-16
* * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETER.\1INE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and
contract documents this da.y submitted to the Board of Directors
by Boyle Engineering, District's engineers, for construction of
the Bea.ch Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 17, 18, and 19, from Rostrata
Avenue to Rosecrans Avenue, Contract No •. 3-16, a.re hereby
approved and adopted; and,
Section 2. Tha.t the Secretary be authorized and directed
to advertise for bids for said work pu~suant to the provisions
of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and,
Section 3. That sa.id bids will be received until 11:00 a.m.,
May 10th, 1971, a.t which time said bids will be publicly opened
and read; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's
Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board
of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 19T~.
Agenda Item #38 -U-District 3
SPECIFICATIONS
cournv SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
of Orange County, California
ADDENDUM NO. 1
to
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS AND PLANS
for
SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR
CONTRACT NO. 7-6-2 ...
1. ~tion 122, page 10, add the fol lowing paragraph:
The.Contractor shall provtde continuous s~eeting (tight sheeting) properly
braced on each side of the trench for that portion of the trench 10 feet
on each side of the centerline of the 36-inch MWD water 1 ine. The maxi-
mum irench width in this 20-foot section shall be 1 imited to the largest
outside diameter of the pipe plus 36 inches. Payment for this work shal 1
be included in the contract unit price for which the work is appurtenant.
PLANS
1. S~eit No. 3, change BEGI~ PROJECT Station 144+15.77 to Station 144+16.27.
2. Sheet No. 18, in the Pipe Strength Table, change Station 144+15.77 to
Station 144+16.27 and Length 2045.78 to 2045.28.
3. Sheet No. 21, change· Note 2 of the Phase I 11 restrict ions f ram one north to
west turn to no north to west turn.
CH:ns
4/1/71
01-2919-07-00
''4 Ar:enda. Item :;,:-3 -V-
an-~Jld/~l{,yJ~y,,
Conrad Hohener, Jr., C.E. 10951
District 7
BID
· Eng. Estimate: .$1, 42~, 84 3
T A B U L A T I 0 N
S H E E T
Date April 7, 1971
11:00 a.m.
Contract For:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
8.
~ 10.
SU~fFLO~·TE:-l ~I-ITERCEPTOR, REACH 2, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-2
from Bear Street to l·1ain Street
CONTRACTOR
Ernest E. Pestana, Inc-.
2225 Old Oakland m·;y .
. San .Jose, California 95131
Sully-1·iiller Contracting Co.
3000 E. South Street
Long Beach, California 90805
Merco Construction Engineers, Inc.
1704 Ruxton Lane
Redondo Beach, California 90278
Kordick & Son, Inc. (Joint Venture)
5062 N. Elton Street
Baldwin Park, California 91706
Paramount Constructors, Inc.
2501 H. Rosecrans Ave.
Compton, California 90224
R.E. & R.W. Crane, Inc .
. 6059 Pearce
Lakewood, California 90712
Steve P. Rados, Inc.
112 W. Maple Avenue
Monrovia, California 91016
K.E.C. Company
22018 S. Norwalk
Hawaiian Gardens, California 90716
Charles L. Burch & Sons
2419 N. Chico Avenue
South El Monte, California 91733
TOTAL BID
$1,278,238.00
$1,353,634.oo
$1,355,226.00
$1,379,732.50
$1,391,012.00
$1,435,013.00
$1,463,364.oo
$1,496,248.oo
$1,523,133.00
Agenda Item #44 -W-District 7
RESOLUTION NO. 71-48-7
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONTRACT NO. 7-6-2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SUNFLOWER
INTERCEPTOR_, REACH 2, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-2 (FROM
BEAR STREET TO MAIN STREET)
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange CoUIJ,ty, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day sub-
mitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering, District's
engineers, and concurred in by the_ Chief Engineer, that award of
contract be made to Ernest E. Pestana, Inc. for SUHFLOWER INTERCEPTOR,
REACH 2, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-2 (from Bear Street to Main Street), and
the tabulation of bids and the proposal for said work, are hereby
received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That contract for said Contract No. 7-6-2 is hereby
awarded to Ernest E. Pestana, Inc., in the total runount of $1,278,238,
in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained
therein, said award contingent upon approval of contractor by
Environmental Protection Agency,· relative to compliance with
President's Executive Order No. 11246.
Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District
are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract
with said contractor for said work pursuant to the specifications
and contract documents therefor; and,
Section 4. That all other bids recej_ved for said work are
hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the
unsuccessful bidders.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1971.
~enda Item #44 -x-District 7
RESDLUTION NO. 71-49-7
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GHANT OF EASEMENT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE
OF EASEMENT FROM IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
* * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California.
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated
January 26, 1971, wherein the IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, a
corporation, does grant to County Sanitation District No. 7, a
permanend easement for sewer purposes for property situated in
the County of Orange, State of caiifornia, in connection with extension
of McGaw Avenue Sewer from Von Karm~ .to Flood Control Channel,
is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the real property over which said easement
is granted is more particularly shown on Exhibits "A" and 11 B",
attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is accepted at no
cost to the District; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors
be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in
the Officiai Records of Orange County, California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1971.
Agenda. Item 1145 -Y-District 7
cou::TY s.~7"~I'l':;~l,Ic,:: DI:3'i·~nc·r::> OF o:~_:\~;cz ccu:;TY
P. 0. EOX 5175 -10();.:t Ellis 1\'1cnue
:!.~ount.-~in Valley, Cal.2..!'orni~ 92708
CH.l\EGE ORDER
COlJTfu\CTOR: Sully-Miller Contracting Comoany DATE: Aoril 14, 1971
JOB: SillJFLOWER INTERCEPTOR, REACH 1, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-l
Amount of this ch<:l~se order (.l\DD) (DEDUCT) $ . -0-
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the
contract and/or contract 1w1"k are hereby authorized and as compensn tion
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price
are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Contractor's letter to the District dated March 22,
1971, Section 106 of the Specifications.
The Contractor shall install 84" diameter RCP instead of 81"
diameter RCP as called for in the subject contract. Any addi-
tional expense for thi·s change will be borne by the contractor.
and there will be no additional cha~ge to the District.
~oard authorization date:
April 14, 1971
. BOYLE ENGINEERING
Original Contract Price $ 2 , 29 0 , 481. 00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ __ -..,._;;o_-__
.
This Change (ADD)(DEDUCT) $ -0-----
Amended Contract Price $ 2, 290 ,481. 00
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By /s/ Paul G. Brown
Chj_cf Engineer
SU-.LLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY
By~--~~----------------~------By
--~--~----~------------~---
Agenda. Item #46 -Z-District 7
COtGTY S.~TG_;TIC~: ~IS 1 i:~UCT:~ Ol;' O~:'\:JG7~ COUi-n'Y
P. 0. EOX 5l'l5 -102.'ih Ellis 1\ '/Cnue
~ou.nt.:iin "'i.'nlley > Co.li.fo1·nia 92708
CH!\I·IGE OHDER
C :o. NO. 2 --------
CONTRJ\CTOR: Sully-Miller Contracting Co. DATE: April 14, 1971
JOB: S~TFLOWER INTERCEPTOR REACH 1, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-1
...,,,.,, Amount of this chanse order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ -0-----
In accordance with contract provisions, the folloi·ling changes in the
contra.ct and/or contract '·mrk are hereby authorized and as compensation
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price
are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Environmental Protection Agency directive for
PL84-66o Water Pollution Control ·projects.
The follm·dng statement will be incorporated into Section 9 of
the Sp~cifications:
"Bypassing of untreated or partially treated
was te1·;a ters to surface 1·m ters or drainage
courses will not be permi t.ted. All treatment
processes will remain in continuous and full
·opera ti on during cons true ti on. "
-·
Orieinal Contract Pr lee $ 2,290,481.00
~oard authorization date:
April 14, 1971·
BOi'LE ~NGINEERING
Agenda. Item #-47
Prev. Auth. Changes c.0.#1 $ -0-
.
(ADD) (DEDUCT) $ -o-This Change
Amended Contract Price $ 2i220i481.00
===
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Oranse County, California ·
By /s/ Pnul G. Brown
Chj_cf Engineer
SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY
By----~----~~--~--------~-----
-AA-District 7
RESOLUTION NOo 71-50-7
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORAJ~GE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE
OF GRANT DEED FROM IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
* * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant Deed, dated March 31, 1971,
wherein IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, a corporation, grants to County
Sanitation District No. 7, a perman~nt grant deed for sewer
purposes situated in the County of Orange, State of California,
in connection wit!i sanitary sewer requirements between Red Hill
Avenue and Orange County Airport, is hereby approved and accepted;
and,
Section 2. That the real property over which said grant deed
is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A"
and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That said Grant Deed is accepted at no cost to
the District; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be
authorized and directed to record said Grant Deed in the Official
Records of Orange County, California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1971.
Agenda Item #48 -BB-District 7
~-
RESOLUTION NOo 71-52-7'
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORWIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE
OF GRANT DEED FROM IRVINE INDUS'l1RIAL COMPLEX
* * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange Count'y, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant Deed, dated March 31, 1971,
wherein IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, a corporation, grants to County
Sanitation District No. 7, a permanent grant deed for sewer purposes
situated in the County of Orange, State of California, in connection
with sanitary sewer requirements betwe.en Red Hill Ayenue and Orange
County Airport, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the real property over which said grant deed
is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A"
and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That said Grant Deed is accepted at no cost to
the District; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be
authorized and directed to record said Grant Deed in the Official
Records of Orange County, California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1971.
Agenda Item #49 -CC-District 7
RESOLUTION NO. 71-42-2
APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENrr AND FIRST
SUPPLEMEHT TO WASTE WATER INTERCEPTOR
CAPACITY AGREEl11ENT WITH RrJERSIDE
CUL.:\TY FLOOD COHTROL AND WATER CON-
SERVATION DISTRICT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OB1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
SECOND AMENDMENT AND FIRST SUPPLEMENT
TO WASTE WATER INTERCEPTOR CAPACITY
AGREEMENT WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
* * * * * * * * *
The Boa.rd of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY HESOLVE, DETERM:INE AND ORDER:
Section 1. Tha.t the certain Second Amenc.ment a_r1d First
Supplement to Waste Water Interceptor Capacity Agreement with
Riverside County Flood Control and Wa.ter Conservation District,
providing for alternate financing of Riverside County Flood
Control a.nd Wa.ter Conservation District's share in the construction
costs of Santa. Ai.via River Interceptor from Plant No. 1 to Katella.
Avenue, is hereby approved a.nd accepted; and,
Section 2. Tha.t the Cha.irman and the Secretary of the
District be authorized and directed to execute sa.id amendment
on behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED a.t an adjourned regular meeting held
March 30, 1971.
Agenda Item # 5 3 -DD-District No. 2
~-
-~
·110310
• f
SECOND AHENDHENT AND FIRST SUPPLEHENT TO
WASTE WATER INTERCEPTOR CAPACITY }\GREEMENT
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT AND FIRST S.UPPLE!-1....ENT of that
certain Waste Water Interceptor Capacity Agreement of May,
1970, is made and ent~red into this day of March, 1971,
by COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, herein
called "District 2" and RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER.CO~SERVATION DISTRICT, herein called "Riverside District".
RECITALS
1. Riverside District has in good faith and with due
diligence attempted to iciplement th~ provisions of the Waste
Water Interceptor Capacity Agreement within the time limits
therein set forth.
2. Due to the overloading of its existing trunk
sewers, it is essential that District 2 build the first
stage of Reach 1 of the Santa Ana River Interceptor downstream
from Katella Avenue. (See map, Exhibit "D", attached.) To
that end, District 2 proposes to award initial contracts for
said construction work during the summer of 1971. It is in
.. the interests of the general public within the Santa Ana
River Watershed that said first ~tage of Santa Ana River
Inter6eptor should contain capacity for the ultimate require-
ments of the drainage area upstream from Prado Dam, which
have been determined to be 50 mgd.
3~ In order to facilitate the i~ediate construction
·•
A -end a Itc:~11 #53 EE-1 Dj_s tric t ~;o. c
.
I ;
I
L-
.-.-
\ .
~-
710310
of said first stage of Reach 1, Riverside District has
joined District 2 in an application for Federal and State
grant funds to assist in such construction.
· 4. Although the original Waste Water Interceptor
Capacity Agreement contemplated the _prior funding by
. Riversfde District of its share of the entire Santa Ana
·.River Interceptor, it now appears feasible to undertake
said construction in a series of sections to be scheduled
over a period of. time. For that purpose, it is essential
only that Riverside District be prepared to purchase that
.•
.portion of its capacity right which is~ represente~ by con-
struction costs actually incurred in staged construction by
District 2.
COVENANTS
NOW THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the premises and
the covenants hereinafter contained, the parties agree as
follows:
"FIRST SUPPLEHENT
·1. Definitions. The definitions of the original
agreement are hereby adopted and used in this amendment.
2. Riverside District's Obligation. Riverside
District agrees to pay its proportionate share of the con-
struction costs of the first stage of Reach 1 on the schedule,
at the time, and in the amounts calculable in the same mapner
as though said reach ha~ been consttucted u~der the origin~l
Waste Water Interceptor Agreem·ent; . provided, however, t~at
-2-
Agenda. Item #53 EE-2 District i·~a. ?
!
I
I
L-
r·-
1
•."
.........,, . {a) if Sanitation Districts fail to approve
on or before Ju?e 15, 1971, an extension of time
for purchase of capacity under the Waste Water
Treatment and Disposal Agreement,· in a form sub-
st?ntially as Exhibit "E" her:et~, or
. .
{b) Federal and State grant funds equiva-
lent to 50% of Riverside District's share of
audited capital costs are not formally offered,
Rive'rside District shall have ·the right to withdraw from
said obligation and abandon its rights her.eunder without
further cost or penalty. Said withdrawal shall be accom-
plished by serving written notice on District 2 at least ten
days before the award of the first construction contract on
the first contract for construction ~n said first stage of
Rec.ch 1. Provided, hmvever, that Riverside District shall
·be obligated, notwithstanding any such withdrawal, for its
proportional share of any audited capital costs incurred
prior to such ns>tice of withdrawal. ·Provided, further, that
nothing herein contained shall require District 2 to construct
said first stage of Reach 1.
-3. Nature of Right Acquired. The carrying capacity
right acquired by Riverside District by reason of its par~
·ti~ipation in audited capital costs of said first stage of
--·--·--Reach 1 ·shall ·extend only to said first stage of Reach 1 and
...,,_, . shall not represent a right to discharge wa·ste water into any
other faci~ity of District 2. Riverside District shall have
710310 -3-
EE-3 Dj_strj_ct No. c
I
L
...
r
l
\ .
no right to discharge waste water into the existing facil-
ities of District 2 until Riverside District shall have
acquire~ treatment and disposal capacity in the existing
expanded facilities of Sanitation Districts.
4. Option to Participate in Subsequent Reaches.
Riverside ·District shall have the option, on six months'
written notice from District 2, to participate in and to
acquire 50 mgd carrying capacity in each and all subsequent
reaches of Santa Ana ·River Interceptor on the same terms and
conditions and upon payment of the sums as provided in the
original contract. Upon completion of the entire Santa Ana
River Interceptor, Riverside District's rights shall be the
same as provided under said original contracte
SECOND AHEND1·1E:~T
5. Capital Payment~. The ·provisions of Paragraph 2
are amended to add the following: "Any delinquent payment
hereunder by Riverside District shall bear interest at the
rate of 7% per annum from·date of delinquency."
6. Option to Reduce Capacity. The provisions of
Paragraph 8 are deleted from the Waste Water Interceptor
Capacity Agreement.
1·. Financing by Riverside District. Paragraph 10
--is -amended to read in full as follows: "Ri ve.rside District
will finance, construct and install its own waste water
·collection and interceptor system within its boundaries for
the purpose of delivering its waste water to.the delivery
710310 ----, -4-
EE:--4 District ·•
i
I
L.
·point. "
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have affixed their
· signatures as of the day and date first above written.
Approved as to form:
MILLER, NISSON & KOGLER
By
Counsel
Recorrunended:
By
Chief Engineer
Approved as to form:
RAY T. SULLIVAN, JR.
County Counsel
CLAYSON, STARK, ROTHROCK & MANN
-~y-------~-----:-----Special Counsel
710310 -5-
EE-5
COUNTY SA...1\JITATION DISTRICT
NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY
By
By
Chairman of the
Board of Directors
Secretary
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
By
Attest:
Cha.irman of the
Board of Sup2rvisors
DONALD D. SULLIVAN, Clerk
By
r-
I ~
ro
,~
II~
•"'.)
l::t:f:::
\Jl w
~j
trj
I
°"'
\
::j
i'·
: {J I~ b' !rt .
i . r
•• ""1
tJj x :r.
H
U1
H
..... ]
= t:1
:::
(
---
.. , .......
(
.....
-FIRST STAGE -
..
~
PLAN OF
SANTA ANA RIVER' INTERCEPTOR
SHOWING FIRST STAGE ·
' t
REACH
· ...
(
....
.. _
·.I
. ,REACH 2 :
~-------· ...... , ... I •
-·---·" I
I
~-J.. ,_
1 .
710310
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
WASTE WATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT of the Waste Water Treatment and
Disposal Agreement of May, 1970, is made and entered into
this day of March, 1971, by Sanitation Districts and
Riverside District.
-RECITALS
1. Riverside District has in good faith an·d with d:le
· diligence sought to implement the provisions of the Waste
Water Treatment and Disposal Agreement within the time periods
set forth.
2~ Riverside District and District 2 have concurrent-
ly herewith entered into an amendment of and supplement to
the Waste Water Interceptor Capacity Agree~ent, whereby
Riverside District commits itself to purchase and acquire a
50 m.g.d. capacity right in the first stage of Reach 1 of the
Santa Ana River interceptor in order to preserve said capacity
for use for the draining area upstream from Prado Dam.
3. Ultimate implementation of the regional interceptor,
treatment and disposal system contemplated by the original
agreements between the parties is in the best interests of the
general public within the Santa Ana River Watershed.
NOW THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the premises, of the
.concurrent execution of said amendment of the Waste Water Inter-
~eptor Capacity Agreement, .and of the covenants hereinafter
Agenda Item #54
EXHIBIT E
-1-
FF-1 District :,:o. 2
I
I
i
L.
.' ,
•. .
"-"' contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Effective Date and Term of Right. Paragraph l(d)
:is amended to add at the end thereof the clause: "but in no
event later than December 31, 2023."
2. Payment for Initial 5 m.g.d. Regulated Maximum
Flow. Paragraph 2(a) (l) is amended to read: "The sum of
$1,625,000, escalated, payable prior to discharge of waste
water by Riverside District pursuant hereto."
3. Financing by Riverside District. Paragraph 8 is
amended to read in full as follows: "Riverside District
shall finance, ·construct and in~tall its own waste water
:
collection system within its borindaries for the purpose of
~ delivering its waste water to the delivery point."
. -.
'710310
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this
agreement as of the day and year first above writter ..
EXHIBIT E
-2-
Agenda It·erri #54 FF-2 Distrj_ct ::o. 0
i
!
i L_.
_.
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
JOINT ~EETING OF TilE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11,
OF ORANGS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular joint meeti.ng of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, anrl 11, of Orange
·county, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m.,
April 14 ! 19 71 , 10844 Ell is Avenue, Fount a in
Valley, California.
The Chairman of the Joint A1ministrative Organization called
the meeting to order at 7:30 p~n.
The roll was called and the Secretary reporte~ a quorum
present ·for each District's Boar0.
* * * * * * * * *
Action concerning
accrued compensatory
time of deceased
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the letter dated February
16, 1971, from Robert B. Holland,
attorney for the Estate of Norman
R. Tremblay, and the memorandum
employee Nonnan R.
Tremblay
dated January 27, 1971, from C. Arthur Nisson, General
Counsel, be received and ordered filed; a.nd,
FURTHER MOVED: That the following actions be approved
concerning the claim by the Estate of Nonnan R. Tremblay
for payment of accrued compensatory time in accordance
with appropriate salary regulations, as recommended
by the General Counsel:
Authorize payment of 53 hours of compensatory
time accrued through October 1963; and,
Deny claim for payment of 787.5 hours of
compensatory time accrued subsequent to
October 1963; and,
That the General Counsel be directed to advise the
attorney for the family of Norman R. Tremblay of the
legal prov:isions preventing payment of compensatory time
accrued ~ubseq_1·ent to October 1963 .
. STATE OF CALIFORNIAl ss .
COUNTY OF ORANGE
I, J. WAYNE·SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the
Boarrls of Directors of County Sanitation Distri~ts Nosg
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
~o hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full,
true an~ correct copy of minute entries on meeting of
saia Boards of Directors on the 14thday of April
19 71 '
14th
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hanrl this
0ay of April, 1971
S-107
1,
of Directors
nitation Districts Nos.
6, 7, and 11
..
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE .REGULAR
MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 . ,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular meeting of the Board· of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 2 , of Orange County, California,
was held at the hour of 7: 30 p .m., April 14 ,
19 71 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.rn.
The roll was called end the Secretetry reported a quorum
of the Board present.
Directors present: Edward Just (Chairman), Jerry Christie, Robert
Clark, Norman E. Culver, Mark Stephenson,
Robert Finnell, Wade Herrin, Hal Sims, Don Smith,
Henry Wedaa, Robert Winn and Robert Battin
Directors absent: None
Present: J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary of the Board
District 2
Adjournment
* * * * *
Mpved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, be adjourned
to April 19, 1971 at 5:00 p.m. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 8:50 p.m., April 14, 1971 .
STATE OF CALIFORNIA~
SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE
I, J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District NQ. 2 , of Orange
County, California, do hereby certify the above and fore-
going to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries
on record taken from the minutes of the regule.r meeting of
said Board on the 14th day of April , 19 71
IN WTTNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hand and
affixe~·th~ official seal of County Sanitation District No. 2
of Orenge County, C2lifornia, this h day of April ,
19 71-.
S-108
Meeting Date 1iil ~ 12 l Time ~t 3Q District QQSl
DISTRICT 1 I JOINT BOARDS
Gris et ./ Herrin Culver
Miller " Coco Arbiso Lewis
Porter IA.. Baum Hogard
Battin / Berton Westra
Christie Root
DISTRICT 2 Clark Magnus
Davis Bousma..ri
Just ~ Harper Stephenson Dutton
Christie ../ Root Finnell Gomez
·1ark ./ Magnus Gibbs
~ulver ,/ Green Shipley
Stephenson ./ Dutton Gris et Herrin
Finnell ./ Gomez Harvey Kanel
Herrin v Griset Herrin Gris et
Sims ,/ Zuniga Hirth Croul
Smith ../ Hileman Hyde Kroes en
Wedaa ./ Machado Just Harper
Winn ./ Schniepp Mc Innis Hirth
Battin ./ McWhinney
Miller -Coco DISTRICT 3 Parsons
Culver ./ Porter
Arbiso v Lewis Rogers Hirth
Baum ./ Hogard Shipley Coen
Berton 7 Westra Sims Zuniga
Christie ./ Root Smith Hileman
Clark ./ Magnus Wedaa Machado
Davis ./ Bousman Winn Schnie~~
Stephenson ..; Dutton Battin
Green ,/ Shipley
Harvey ../ Ka.nel
Herrin ./ Gris et * * * * i(-* Hyde ./ Kroes en Mitchell
Just '] Harper Boyd Goldber:
"tfcWhinney J
~ims --r Zuniga OTHERS
Battin .I
Harper v
DISTRICT 5 Brown c/
Sylvester (/'
Parsons / Carlson
Hirth v Croul Clarke ,/
Battin ,/ Dunn
Finster
DISTRICT 6 Galloway --Hohener i/
Porter ().,, Hunt ~
Mc Innis / Hirth Keith v
Battin v' Lowry
Maddox ./
DISTRICT 7 Martinson J
Nissan c../
Miller v Coco Piersall
Gris et ./ Herrin Sigler --v
Porter (;_, Stevens ,/
Crabb ,/ ~ v Hirth I) Smith . ./ Hileman Z~>I.• .>/.<. Battin ~ /~ t l)ISTRICT 11 f ! :Jii~~ ~ -J
'-' ,/ Coen ffi I J p1ey-~-
Gibbs _A:,-gA, ~: OI) rvv' e~ .(...,?J
{1 Battin l • I
DISTRICT 8
Boyd \/' Goldberg
Mitchell ~.
Battin tl
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
April 6, 1971
NOTICE TO: SPECIAL COMMITTEE OF DISTRICT NO. 2
DIRECTORS APPOINTED TO STUDY THE
SAN'rA ANA RIVER BASIN PROJECT
Chairman Ed Just
Joint Chairm9.n Norman Culver
Supervisor Robert Battin
Director Henry Wedaa
Directo~ Don Smith
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
A meeting of the special committee has been arranged
with representatives from Riverside Colmty on Friday,
April 9th, 10:45 a.m., in the Sanitation Districts'
offices, to discuss the Santa Ana River Basin Project.
FAH:j
~o.
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
cc: C. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel
All District No. 2 Directors
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
March 2L1., 1971
T'O: i:liE>IBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATIO!'l
DIS'I'PICT NO. 2
Gent1cme::1:
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
Pursucmt to adj ournr:wnt of the regular meeting held March 10,
1971,, the Boa.rd l)f Directors of' Cour1ty Sa.n:tta.tion District
~op 2, will meet in a~ adjourned regular meeting:
rruescla.y ~ ~~crc:L jO, 1971
&.t 5: 30 ~~. m.
l08hLi El.lL~ A·venue
Fountain Va.11ey, Ga1:1.fornia.