HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971-02-10COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX Bl 27. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
February 5, 1971
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910.
962-2411
TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OP COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 fillID 11
Gentlemen:
Th.e next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of
County Sanitation Dlstricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, a.nd 11,
of Orange County, California, will be held:
Wednesday evening, February 10, 1971
at 7:30 p.m.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Ten ta.ti ve a.djournments prior to next regular meeting:
Executive Commit.tee: F'ebrua.ry 23_, 19'"(1, 5:30 p.m.
Districts Nos. 1 and 7: February 23, 1971, 5:00 p.m.
II
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
P. 0. Box 5175
10844 Ell is Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Teleph ones:
Aree Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
February 5, 1971
REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday, February 10, 1971
7:30 p.m.
The following is a brief explanation of the more important non-
routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not
otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are not a ttached to the
agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but
wi ll appear in the complete agenda availa~le at the meeting.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Joint Boards
Nos. 14 and 15 -REPORT OF EXECUTIVE AND BUILDING COMMITTEES AND
ACTIONS ON COMMITTEES' RECOMMENDATIONS: The Committees met during
the evening of January 28, with Director Stevenson as a guest . A
report of the meeting , together with the recommendations to the Joint
Boards is enclosed with this mailing. Agenda Item No. 15 (a through
f) is consideration of the recommendations set forth in the Committees'
report.
No. 17 -QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT: Our independent auditors,
Hanson, Peterson, Cowles and Sylvester, Certified Public Accountants,
have advised that they are mailing to the Directors, under separate
cover, their required report for the period e nding September 30,
1970. The staff wi ll be prepared to answer any questions the
Directors may have on the material in the report.
No. 18 -MID-YEAR BUDGET REVIEW: Mr. Sylvester will present a report
on our operating and capital outlay expenditures during the first
half o f the fiscal year compared with budget amounts and expenditures
in the corresponding period of 1969-70. Mat e rial on this sub ject is
being forwarded under s eparate cover.
No. 19 -CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, TO PLANT JOB NO. J-4-A: Owing to a
delay in the approval of drawings , etc., the staff is recommending
that an extensjon of time of 8 days be granted on this contract for
the purc h a se of a 750 KVA dtstrihut.i on service traus f'o rme r for
Plant No. 2.
No. 20 -EXTENSION OF TIME FOR OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 (JOB NO. J-10):
It is our policy to ask the contractor on this job to apply for
extensions of time as delays occur. He has requested, and the
engineers have approved, an extension of one day for January 5, 1971,
because of high winds. The action appearing under this item is
accordingly recommended.
No. 21 -ATTENDANCE AT MEETING OF ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN
SEWERING AGENCIES (AMSA): This organization, whose activities have
been previously reported on verbal ly, is scheduling a meeting in
Washington, D.C., during March. The Directors are aware of the value
of participating in these meetings, particularly with respect to the
Association's activities relating to construction grants and Federal
regulations on construction and operation of treatment works . It is
recommended that one staff member be authorized to attend the March
meeting.
No. 22 -PROPOSAL FOR DESIGN OF NEW PUMP STATION AND ADDITIONS TO
BYPASS FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. l, JOB NO. I-7-3: Included in the
agenda material is a proposal, dated February 3, from our Plant
design engineers for engineering services in connection with the
above facilities. As stated in the letter, it is necessary to pro-
ceed with design immediately in order that the facilities may be
operational by the time flows from the Sunflower Interceptor facilities
reach the Plant. We recommend acceptance of the proposal on a per
diem basis for a total fee not to exceed $10,500.
Districts Nos. 1 and 7
No. 26 -INTERDISTRICT AGREEMENT REGARDING MAIN-DYER INTERCEPTOR:
The next regularly scheduled construction project, approved under the
1969 Engineer's Reports, is the Main-Dyer Interceptor. This facility
will connect with the new Sunflower Interceptor at South Main Street
and run northerly to Dyer and thence easterly to Halladay Street.
Although District No . 7 will have only a very small interest in the
new sewer (approximately 1%), it will be necessary to enter into an
agreement providing for joint construction and use of the interceptor.
The proposed agreement appearing in the agenda material is very
similar to that adopted last year for the new Sunflower Interceptor.
Nos. 27 and 28 -ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY FOR SUNFLOWER INTER-
CEPTOR, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-1: The General Counsel advises that he has
reached agreement with the property owners for acquisition of
permanent and temporary easement for the above facility through
undeveloped property at the lower end of the project. He recommends
the action indicated on the agenda under this item.
District No. 1
No. 30 -ENGINEERING PROPOSAL FOR MAIN-DYER INTERCEPTOR: I have
asked the District 1 s engineers, Boyle Engineering, to submit a
proposa l for the necessary engineering services in connection with
the project described under Item No . 26. A lump sum design fee of
-2-
$23,100 has been negotiated and it is recommended that the proposal
be accepted on this basis.
Nos. 31 and 32 -EXCHANGE OF DEEDS REGARDING RIGHT OF WAY I N
CONNECTION WITH EASEMENT FOR SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-1:
In connection with the settlement recommended by the General Counsel
for acquisition of new right of way, as described under Item No. 28,
the General Counsel is recommending that the District quitclaim an
existing fee ownership in return for an easement on the same parcel.
No. 35 -ADJOURNMENT TO 5:00 P.M. FEBRUARY 23: Bids for a large
Plant job (Sedimentation Basin "K 1' and Digester "K" at Plant No. 2,
Jo b No. P2-17) will be opened on February 17 and it is recommended
that the Board adjourn, for the purpose of awarding a contract, to a
concurrent meeting with District No. ?, which immediately precedes
the next Executive Committee meeting.
District No. 5
No. 36 -FINAL APPROVAL OF ANNEXATION NO. 4: The Directors will
rec.all that the Board recently gave preliminary approval to this
small (1.88 acres) annexation in the Harbor View Hills a rea. The
resolution appearing in the agenda material finalizes Board act ion on
this matter.
District No. 7
No. 45 -ADJOURNMENT TO 5:00 P .M., FEBRUARY 23: Bids for the first
unit of the Sunflower Interceptor (from Treatment Pl ant No. 1 to
Be ar Street, Contract No. 7-6-1) will be opened on Februar y 17 and it
is r ecommended that the Board a djourn, for the purpose of awa rding a
contract, to a concurrent meeting with Distric t No. 1, which
immediately precedes the Executive Committee meeting. Over 60 sets
of plans and specifications have been taken out fo r this job, which
is an all-time record. We a r e therefore hopeful of receiving
favorable bids.
District No. 3
Nos. 50 a nd 51 -EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR CONTRACTS NOS. 3-12 AND 3-13 :
The se two recommended change orde rs grant extensions of time of 29
and 30 days, respectively, for these two contracts, which are a
portion of the Westside Interceptor Facilities, now nearing completion.
The time extensions a re detailed on the change orders appearing in
the agenda mate ria l.
Nos . 52 through 54 -COMPLETION OF CONTRACT NO . 3-14: The K.E .C.
Company, contractor f or the Westminste r Avenue Interceptor Sewer,
satisfactoril y completed his work on January 28 and the c los eout of
the contract, by means of these three agenda items, is recommended.
It em No. 52 authorizes a deduction of $564 as explained on the change
order and Item No. 53 is the customary change order providing for
adjustment. of contract price to r efl ect diffe rences in amounts of
-3-
unit quantities actually installed over those shown in the original
contract. The deduction of $31,274.50 was due principally to the
fact that it was not necessary to use chemical grout for the tunnel
construction under the San Diego Freeway, the cost of which was
provided for on a unit price basis in the contract.
Item No. 54 is the routine resolution accepting the job as
complete and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Completion.
Nos. 55 and 56 -SETTLEMENT OF LAWSUIT WITH CITY OF WESTMINSTER:
This matter was reported on and discussed at some length at the
January Board meeting. Mr. Nissan has advised that he wishes to
report on the conclusion of this matter.
No. 57 -PURCHASE OF 10-INCH PUMP FOR LOS ALAMITOS PUMPING STATION:
To provide for expected increase in flows, the engineers and our
maintenance staff are recommending that we purchase, as soon as
possible, an additional 10-inch pump. Since it is anticipated that
delivery of this pump will take considerable time, it is recommended
that bids be taken immediately and that the staff be authorized to
award a purchase contract in an amount not to exceed $3,200.
District No. 2
No. 61 -REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME BY THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT FOR FINANCING ITS SHARE OF
SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR AND PURCHASE OF PLANT CAPACITY: Included
with the agenda material is a letter from the Riverside District on
this subject and we recommend that the financing deadline be extended
to May 15. The staff will be prepared to report in more detail on
this subject, if desired.
No. 62 -REPORT OF STAFF ON FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS FOR SANTA ANA
RIVER INTERCEPTOR: This matter was discussed at the January 6
adjourned meeting. As stated, Mr. Brown and representatives of the
Riverside District attended a meeting with the staff of the State
Water Resources Control Board on January 19. He learned that the
portion of the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Plant No. 1 to
Katella Avenue has a very favorable chance of receiving Federal and
State funding, provided that application is made after March 1 (Item
No. 63) and complete plans and specifications are submitted to the
funding agencies by June 1, 1971. Mr. Brown and I will go into
greater detail on this matter at the meeting.
The next three items relate to expediting preparation of plans
and spec ifications to meet the above-mentioned June 1 deadline .
No. 63 -AUTHORIZING FILING FOR FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS FOR SANTA
ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR: This item is the approval of the necessary
Board resolution before State and Federal grants can be applied for.
-4 -
No. 64 -ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR FROM
PLANT NO. 1 TO KATELLA AVENUE: We have asked the District's engineer,
Lowry and Associates, to submit a proposal for the necessary final
design services for this project. It will be recalled that the
District employed this firm last year to do preliminary design work,
fees for which have now reached approximately $22,000. The staff has
negotiated a lump sum fee in the amount of $283,420 for all required
services, with the preliminary design fees to be credited against
this amount. We consider this fee reasonable in view of the esti-
mated cost ($8.1 million) and complexity of the project and recommend
that the proposal, as appearing in the agenda material, be accepted
and a contract entered into.
No. 65 -EMPLOYMENT OF SOILS ENGINEERING FIRM FOR SANTA ANA RIVER
INTERCEPTOR FROM PLANT NO. 1 TO KATELLA AVENUE: In accordance with
the recently adopted policy of all of the Districts, we have soli-
cited proposals from four firms recommended by the design engineers
for soils investigation necessary in the design of this project. The
replies of the four firms to our request are included with the agenda
material, together with a letter of recommendation from Lowry and
Associates. It will be noted that all four firms have refused to
quote definite prices for the work prior to being actually selected
for the job.
Because of the necessity of getting this work under way at the
earliest possible moment and in view of the recommendation of Lowry
and Associates, it is recommended that the staff be authorized to
negotiate with the firm of Geolabs-California, Inc., Santa Ana, to
provide the necessary services for a fee not to exceed $15,000. We
have compared this fee with similar recent work and find it to be
reasonable.
-5-
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
~ REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
Mr. Harper reported that the State Water Resources Control
Board has announced a public hearing to be held on February
18th concerning proposed regulations for administering State
and Federal construction grants. As previously reported one
of the staff's primary concerns is in the definition of
interceptor sewer. The proposed regu:ations also provide
that grants shall not be allowed for that portion of the
facility designed to provide capacity exceeding twice that
needed to serve existing development or the projected 20-year
needs, whichever is the more restrictive. Mr. Harper pointed
out that the Districts interceptors are designed to provide
capacity based on the land use plans of the sewered cities
and the county and that this provision might notcpply in the
Districts case inasmuch as ultimate requirements are derived
from these basic master plans of the local sewering agencies.
....
2/10/71
WARRAN'J1 NO.
14814
14815
14816
llt817
14818
14819
14820
14821
14822
14823
14824
14825
14826
14827
14828
14829
14830
lli831
148~2
14833
14834
1 1 ~-835
14836
14837
14838
·1483()
llJ-840
14841.
llt 8Ji2
lh8h3
llJ.84-4
llf 8JJ.5
148'-~6
14847
1481+8
lhg4g
14850
14851
14852
14853
14854
14855
14856
14857
14858
14859
14-860
14861
14862
14863
14864
14865
14866
iJ.1-867
11-~868
14869
14870
11+871
14-872
JOINT OPERL\TING FUND WARRAHTS
IN FP.VOR OF
A-1 Stanton Rentals, Equipment Rental $
AMSA, 1971 Membership (MO 1-13-71)
Adept Mfg., Inc., Pump Parts
All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings
Allied Bolt ~ Supply, Small Hardware
Amoco Chemicals, L3b Supplies
City of Anaheim, Power
The Anchor Packing Co., Pump Parts
Anaheim Dodge, Truck Parts
Apco Supply, Controls
Aquatic Ce~ter, Air Card
Associated Concrete Products, Manhole Sections
Ra~ph W. Atkinson Co., Pump Parts
Barksdale, Valve Parts
Bearing Specialty Co., Pump Parts
Becker Pump & Engr. Co., Pump Bearings
Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repairs
Bird Machine Co., Centrifuge Parts
Blower Paper Co., Janitorial SuppJ~es
Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Magneto Repairs
Buck's Welding Works, Westslde Bypass Welding
C & R Reconditioning Co~, Pump Repair
Certified Labs, Inc., Chemicals
College Lumber Co., Inc., Small Hard~are
Compressor Systems: Inc., Freight In
Colsolidated Elect. Dist., Inc., Electrical Supplies
Consolidated Freightways, Freight
Continental-Emsco Co., Truck parts
Constructors Supply Co., Small Hardware & Tools
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
Deaver Mfg. Co., Truck Parts
John M. Deck Co., Small Hardware
Diesel Control Corp., Gover~or Repairs
Don's Lawn Mower Shop, Equipmer;.t Repair
Clark Dye Hardware, Small Tools
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies
Enterprise Printing Co., Printing Supplies
Fiberglass Specialties, Panels for Sed. Basins
Fischer & Porter Co., Chlor. Parts & Controls
Foss Co., Lab Supplies
Fowler Equipment, Inc., Equipment Rental
Fredson Co., Truck Parts
Freeway Machine & WeldiDg Shop, Machining
City of Fullerton, Water
GAF Corp., Reproductior~ Supplies
Gaines Electric Supply Co., Electrical Equipment
Gar Wood Truck Equipment, Truck Equipment
Garden Grove Lumber & Cement Co .. , Bldg. Materials
General Electric Supply Co., Electrical Supplies
General Telephone Co.
Georgia-Pacific Corp., Chlorine
Glidden-Durkee Co., Paints
Goldenwest Fertilizer Co., Grit Removal
Goorlall Rubber Co., Safety Supplies
Graybar Electric Co., Inc., Electrical Supplies
Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Parts & Repair
Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting & C.O.D~ Expense
Harron, Rickard & McCone Co., Equipment Rental
William P. Hayden, Employee Mileage
-·8-
. '
P.Momrr"'-""
100.00
1,250.00
120.00
191.10
203.05
140.40
12.50
472.79 -
11.54
. 21.11
15.50
1,201.69
25.11
633.22
146. 63
26.25
163.50
216.85
79.96
402.62
89.S.oo
95.00
85.75
25;. 7< 13.6~
894.95
97.6€1
77.93
839.23
510.17
37.80
17.68
195.68
88.39
22.09
119.30
63.84
1,764.00
3,164.86
21.00
1,657.38
41.66
512.40
4.14
4.95. 76
2,127.30
443.76
153.35 246.2.-
856.4~'
31, 884 .. 83
142.24
768.00
155.30
222.60
122.64
149.04
207.70
30.30
. '
ALL DI ST RICTS
Ac c epting propo s al of
J ohn Ca r ol lo Engineers ,
for pr e p aration of plan s
and speci f ications fo r
Interim Pum p St a tion and
Additi ons to BYP a.s s
Faciliti es at Pl a nt J\f '.). 1 ,
J ob No . I -7 -3
2/10/71
Moved , seconded and duly carri e d :
That the proposal of John Carollo
Eng ineers, dated February 3 , 1 9 71 ,
for engineering servic es fo r the
preparation of plans and specifications
for Interim Pump Station and Addit ions
to Bypass Facilities at P l ant No . 1,
J ob No . I -7 -3, b e a pproved as
r ecommended by the s taff ; and ,
That the G er~e ral Manage r be authorized to dire ct the engineers
t o proceed with said work for a total am ount not to exceed
$10 ,500 .00 ; and,
That payme nt for said se rvices is hereby authori zed to b e ma .d e
i n accord ance with the terms and conditions contained in the
agre em ent wi th J ohn Carollo Eng ineers , dated July 1, 1970 .
ALL DISTRICTS
Letter fr om City of Cos ta
Mesa r e : use o f tre ated
effluent f or irr i g ation
purpos es , r ec e i ve d
o rde r ed filed . a nd
r e f e rre d t o Ex ecutive
Comrn i ttee
Mov e d, seconded and duly carri ed :
That t h e letter f rom City of
Costa Mesa, dated Fe bruary 9 , 1 971,
relative to use of the Districts'
treate d efflu ent for irrigation
purpos e s at the Cos ta Me s a Golf
and County Cl ub, b e r eceive d,
ordere d fil e d , and r eferred to
the Executive Commi tt ee
Board .
for stu dy and report b ack to the
ALL DI STR I CT S
Ce rtific ation of the
Gene ral Manage r , r e -
ceived a nd ordered
fj_l ed
the m to b e in orde r, and
payme nt , be r e c eived and
ALL DIS TR ICTS
Ap proval of Joint Opera.t ing
Fund , Ca p ital Outlay Re v o lving
Fund , and Oce an Outfall No . 2
Construc t i on inspecti on Re -
volving F und warrant b o o k s
Moved, s e c onded and duly carr ied :
That the written ce r tificati on of
the Ge neral Manag er that h e has
p e r sonall y checke d all bills
appearing o n t h e a genda , f ound
that h e r ecomm e nds authori z ation for
ordered f i led .
Mov e d, second e d and duly carried
by roll call vote :
That the Dist r icts ' Joint Operating
Fund , Capital Outlay Revol vin g
Fund and Ocean Outfal l No . 2
Con struction Inspection Revo l ving
Fund warrant b ooks be a p prove d fo r s i g nature of the Chai rman
o f Distri ct No . 1 , and that the County Auditor be authorized
and d i rect e d to pay :
J oint Operating Fund
Ca.pi tal Outl ay Revolving
Fund
Oc e an Ou tfa l l No . 2
Con s truction Ins p e ~ti o n
Re vol ving Fund
$
$
107,587 .89
20 2 ,392 .16
17,3 6 0 .L~l
3 27, 3L~O . 46
in a cc o rda nc e with the fo l l owin g wa rr ant s ;
-7 -
... ,,
Category
Division Code
BarCode
Next Available BarCode
Folder Number
Folder Title
Folder Date
District Number
Board Action/ Award Date
Resolution Number
Description
Comments
Grantor
Permanant Location
Vendor
Job/Contract Number
Purchase Order No.
Contract Date
Renew a I I Extensions
Board Acceptance/Completion Date
Recorded Date and Number
Record Series Code
Event Code
Closed/Completed
Destruction Date
Destruction Hold
Destroyed Date
Creation Date
RMS Created by First Name
RMS Created by Last Name
RMS Created by User Id
RMS Created on Date
RMS Created on Time
Department Number
Department Name
Department Code
Division Number
Division Name
RMS Modified by First Name
RMS Modified by Last Name
RMS Modified by User Id
RMS Modified on Date
RMS Modified on Time
Record Number
Record Series Name
Record Series Description
~ Record State
RMS Current User ID
~
Value (Costa Mesa, City of 2-71 -All)
151
019095067260
(019095071576)
cos
Costa Mesa, City of
02/10/1971
All
02/10/1971
Page 1 of2
Agreement for use of Districts' treated effluent for the Costa
Mesa Golf Course
City of Costa Mesa
143 CONTRACTS/ AGREEMENTS, BOARD APPROVAL
REQUIRED
Closed, Completed
FALSE
http://magnesium:8081/Image2000/jsp/coding_print.jsp?objectType=NRT200&objectld=529 3/1/2007
Rms State
Type of Document
RMS Owner Id
RMS Customer Id
Action Date
Work Order Number
Change Order Number
Sup Agree Number
Contract Number
Reference Number
Corporate Name
Instrument Number
Recording Date
Keyword
Page 2 of2
http://magnesium:8081/lmage2000/jsp/coding_print.jsp?objectType=NRT200&objectld=529 3/1/2007
'-.. l.~
MONTGOMERY R E S EA R C H I N C.
0 I V I S I 0 N 0 F J A M !' c, M M 0 r: T G 0 ~~ 0: R Y C 0 N S U L T I N G F N G 1 N E E" R c, : N C
555 EAST WALNUT STREET. PASADENA. CALIFORNIA 91101
<213l 796-9141
November 2, 1971
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County
P.O. Box5175
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention: Mr. Fred A. Harper
Gentlemen:
r.."..., --.~ ~1 'J'l..:f-·-";' ·-,-~· ....... "'""'~ ........ -...... •f///.&.~J..1"""""5" .L
(213> 681-4255
Confirming our meeting of Friday, October 29, with Mr. Ray Lewis,
this letter outlines the recommended procedures for the Costa Mesa Golf
Course Irrigation Study.
The objective of this two-month study is to learn the effects of spreading
secondary e££l~ent a.r.d a ble~d cf se~o~da!"y effl~c!'lt and bc2..l v.rcll v;atc!"
on the various grasses and soils of the golf course. An area of approxi-
mately 100 ft by 100 ft has been designated as the test site. This test site
is located on the green, fairway and rough of hole No. 15 next to the fire
station and City vehicle service yard on the south-central side of the g-01£
course.
The test site will be divided into two 100-ft by 50-ft test strips (see Fig. 1),
labeled Test Area A and Test Area B. Test Area A will be watered with
secondary effluent and Test Area B with a mixture of effluent and local well
water. A 50:50 mixture will be used at first and, pending the outcome of
c.ai-lj ~c;:;ts, uLl.i.e:c 111ix~u.r e::; rnay be tried.
The recommended procedure is to fill the hauling truck assumed to be a
5 00-gal tank truck provided by the City, at the treatment plant following the
addition of a predetermined quantity ( 10 grams at first) of HTH disinfectant.
The load will then be hauled to the test site and pumped into the sprinkler
system. A portable self-priming pump for this purpose will be rented to the
City by our firm. Two-thirds of the load (333 gal) will be spread onto Test
Area A. During this spreading period, a 1-qt sample will be collected.
A portion of the sample will be used for bacteriological examination, residual
.._.,.
~ 0 N T G 0 M E R Y
County Sanitation Districts
Of Orange County
R E S E A R C H
-2-
..,
I N C 0 R P 0 R A T E D
November 2, 1971
chlor.ine, pH, and electrical conductivity analyses and the remainder stored
in a refrigerator for the formation of a weekly composite.
Since daily coliform counting is required by the Orange County Health
Department, it is important to have this test done at a nearby lab with
qualified personnel. If possible, we would appreciate having these counts
and the stated analyses perforrned at your District laboratory. The informa-
tion obtained would be mutually valuable in that it would meet the Health
Department's requirements of our study and would define the disinfection
requirements of the plant effluent for future use in any such reclamation
projects.
The weekly water sample composite should be formed by mixing the daily
~amples in proportion to the quantity of water applied thus forming propor-
tional-to-flow composites. The composites will then be sent to a commercial
laboratory or to ouT Firm' R lab in Pasadena for analyses of sodium,
potassiun1, calciurn, magnesiurn, bicarbonate, carbonate, and chloride.
The remaining 167 gal per load will be blended with 167 gal of well water
pumped from a nearby pond into the truck. The truck will then be emptied
by spraying its contents on Test Area B. In this manner, each test area
_will receive the same quantity of water.
Tensiometers will be installed in the fairway area and in the green to help
determine the amount of water required and the watering frequency. Initially,
the ~preading schedule wiJl be one 1oa.d per d.a.y for seven day= c-. 'N~ek.
Alternative schedules may be used if the tensiometer readings indicate such
changes are feasible.
A plastic sheet will be used to cover the test area during periods of rainfall
to block out variations due to the weather. Golf course personnel will be
available throughout the study to insure that such covering of the test plot
is ~one only when necessary.
Soil samples will also be taken and analyzed for electrical conductivity,
sodium, calcium, magnesium, and nitrogen concentrations in the saturated
soil extract. The sampling procedure will consist of forming a composite
for the soil of the greens and of the fairways for each test area. The corn-
posit:es will be formed by mixing 10 individual cores for each composite •
•
........
.M 0 N T G 0 M E R y
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
R E S E A R C H
-3-
~
I N C 0 R P 0 R A T E D
November 2, 1'971
The depths of interest at the putting greens is 0 to 3 inches and, for the
freeways, 0 to 12 inches. The samples will be composited on site and
transferred to a plastic bag, labeled, and transported to a laboratory for
analysis. The recommended sampling frequency is at the beginning, middle,
and end of the study.
A grass growth analysis will be determined on a weekly basis. The green
clipping weight of grass from a defined area will be determined for each
test plot and compared to that of the other as well as to that of the adjacent
golf course area. Also, a visual grading based on human judgment of the
grass color. density of stand, and presentability will be determined.
This is generally done by requesting the grader to rate the appearance on a
scale of 0 to 10 (10 represents ideal grass characteristics). At the beginning,
middle and end of the study, grass samples should be analyzed for the .
nutrient content to determine if increments attributable to the wastewater
effluent nitrog~n ar..d phosphorous content ca~ be fou!1d. If such correlations
are found, it may be possible to decrease the amount of fertilizers added to
the golf course if future irrigation were done with the secondary effluent.
In essence, this outlines the proposed study. If you have any suggestions
or questions of further details of the study, please feel free to call me at
your convenience.
Very truly yours,
~J, T-«~
Rudy J. TeKippe, Ph.D.
/ljn
Attachment
cc: Mr. DuWayne R. Lidke
Mr. Ray E. Lewis
----·-.
- - --
0 1;) ~
~
......
ft> ~ II ~
G' ~ ~ ~ -" ' ~ ~ " ~ ~ ' ~ ?" '::' i ~· ~
~
<;)._.. -~ ~ (\ ~ ~ ~ ~ \
~ \) A:=-= \,) ~
§ ~ "'\ ~ ..... ~ ~' t ~
~ ~ p """:
'\ \ -, '\
~
"' ~ t "' ~ ~
~
Cit
~nda Item No. Q 5
CITY OF COSTA MESA
CALIFORNIA 92626 P. 0. BOX 1200
FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
Mr. Fred A. Harper
General Manager
County Sanitation Districts
P. 0. Box 8121
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Dear Fred:
February 9, 1971
FILED
In the Office o f the Secretary
County ~anitation D istrict
No (\\SJ
:: -
As the Sanitation Districts know, the City of
Costa Mesa operates a municipal golf course on the
state-owned property adjacent to Fairview State Hospital
For several years, we have been experiencing a deterio-
rating water source for irrigation water purposes. The
City, several years ago, drilled a well on the mesa which
is now insufficient for carrying out the irrigation needs
for the Costa Mesa Golf and Country Club. In November of
1970, the City of Costa Mesa hi red the James M. Montgomery
Cons ulting Engineers, Inc., to conduct a study and report
on the irrigation wate r source for the Countr y Club.
The primary finding of the engineering s tudy
is that the city should begin negotiation s wi th the
Sanitation Districts of Orange County for utilization
of the secondary treat ed effluent. It i s on this basis
that I would request the Sanitation Districts t o give
consideration to entering into a joint agreement with the
City of Costa Mesa to supply said secondary treated e ffluent
for water purposes at the Costa Mesa Golf and Country Club.
I will be waiting for your considerations .
FS:gab
CITY DF l:uaTA MESA
CALIFORNIA 92626 P. 0. B.OX 1200
FROM THE OFFICE OF THF-CITY MANAGER
Mr. Fred A. Harper
General Manager
County Sanit~tion Districts
P. 0. Box 8121
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Dear Fred:
February 9, 1971
As t ( i e S a 11 i t a t i o n D i s t r i c t s k n o i.v , t h e C i t y o f
Costa Mesa operates a municipal golf course on the
state-owned property adjacent to fairview State Hospital.
For several years, we have been experiencing a deterio-
r a t i n g w a t e r s o u r c e f o r i r r i g a t i o n "'a t e r p u r p o s e s ·. T h e
C i t y , s e v e r a l y e a r s a g o , d r i l l e d a we l l o n t h e me s a vt h i c h
i s n ow i n s u f f i. c i e n t f o r c a r r y i n g o u t t h e · i r r i g a t i o n n e e d s
for lhe Costa Mesa Golf and Country Club. In November of
1970, the City of Costa Mesa hired the James M. Montgomery
Consulting Engineers, Inc., to conduct a study and report
on the irrigation water source for the Country Club.
The primary finding of the engineering study
is that the city should begin negotiations with the
Sanitation Districts of Orange County for utilization
of the secondary treated effluent. It is on this basis
that I would request the Sanitation Districts to give
consideration to entering into a joint agreement with th~
City of Costa Mesa to supply said secondary treated effluent
for water purposes at the Costa-Mesa Golf a'nd Country Club.
FS:gab
will be waiting for your considerations.
S i n ce r~e / 1 y • ,.,,.J.;-<'J.._,.-
Uf ~ ~v-'' ~·s· RSABAL
CITY MAtJAGER
Agenda Item No. [) 5 -
CITY OF l:DST!i I\'iESA
CALIFORNIA 92626 P. 0. BOX 1200
™ ·mm :s:
FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY MP.NAGER
Mr. Fred A. Harper
Genera 1 Man ager
County Sanitation Districts
P. 0. Box 8121
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Dear Fred:
Febru'ary 9, 1971
As the Sanitation Districts kriov·.J, ti1e City of
Costa Mesa operates a municipal golf course on the
state-owned property adjacent to Fairview State Hospital.
For several years, we have been experiencing a deterio-
rating water source for irrigation water purposes. The
City, several years ago, drilled a well on the mesa which
is now insufficient for carrying out the irrigation needs
for the Costa Mesa Golf and Country Club. In November of
1970, the City of Costa Mesa hired ihe James M. Montgomery
Consulting Engineers, Inc., to conduct a study and report
on the irrigation w~ter source for the Country Club.
The primary finding of the engineering study
is that the city should begin negotiations with t'1e
Sanitation Districts of Orange County for utilization
of the secondary treated effluent. It is on this basis
that I would request the Sanitation Districts to give
consideration to entering into a joint agreement with the
City of Costa Mesa to supply said secondary treated effluent
for water purposes at the Costa Mesa Golf and Country Club.
FS:gab
I wil 1 be waiting for your considerations.
Sincerely ~/;~.v;tY~ A~!(ci s~lBAL
&/f, I TY MANAGER
Item #3 -Mayor only representative entitled to alternate
Act provides that mayor i s automatically member of t h e Board;
provides that if that mayo r is unable to attend he may have an
a.l ternate attend in his pl ace -that person by counc il action is
offic ial alte rnate -those cities entitled to two members on
same boa.rd -mayor and one appointed r epresentative by bo a rd
act i on . Mayor onl y i s entitled t o alternate . Possibility of
getting a. provision in a.ct providing f or al terna.te for
sanitary d istrict s and those memb e rs of t he b oards who a.re
not mayors . a.ct referred to is State Heal th and Safety Code .
Ea.ch city i f represented and ea.ch delegate c an take matter
CLARK
back to his own council . RIMNEX REQUESTED THAT THE SECTION
IN THE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE ABOUT APP OI NTING REPRESENTAT IVE
TO SAN I TATION DI STR I CTS BOARD BE MAILED TO EACH CITY COU NCIL
REPRESENTED .
Ta.ken under advisement by staff and general counsel #..
Item #11 -Called executive and building committee me e ting
f or February 23rd, Tuesday at 5:30 p .m. Directors Harvey
and Finnell t o a ttend -both a.re able .
Presentation of certificates from Californi a. Water Pollution
Cont rol Asso ciation to Elmer Smi t h, Gra.)?i de III and Wi lliam
8-v~s
~ (?), Grade IV.
Item #12 -I n troduced Ray Lew is -graduate of USC with masters
degree in civil engineer ing -licensed in California, Neva.d @, Utah
and Arizona; pr evi ous ly with the District s in 1 960 -61 ; started
again in 1 5th of January. Has been in ~~~lfXM pr i vate ]m::s:xNRXK
State and Federal r egul ations -with regard to interceptor sewers,
Public hearing to be held on the 18th of this month . There
is a. problem :i,.n design ca.pa.bili ty -concern with intercept or
sewer -X~X~ be designed twice present need ~X or for twenty
year need -lflifilHD{~}l[XIXfiliX~Jffi our design is now based on land
use -the regulations state that the lower of the two XXXM
figures will be used (two times present need or twenty year
need)
Item #14 -Miller reported on executive committee recommendations
preliminary NiirnX}I[~ design of a.ddi tion to administration building
vehicle maintenance building not presented a.t this meeting
because building committee wanted to review wi th staff to
make sure not over building
R.M:MXM:1'i Rules of procedures for meetings -consent calendar -
time saver for boards
X:XMX #6 of Exe cu ti ve Committee .report -Hunt -our standards
a.re more rigid ba.cteriologica.lly but thei r s tandards on pa.per
a.re more rigid .
Miller -criticism come up at Boa.rd of Supervisors meet i ng
re : Santa. ana -Riverside project -requests were made
that .KXK our water quality boa.rd have regulati ons a.s good a.s
San Diego 1 s so that our beach water be as pure as t he i rs .
He.rper -Exe cu ti ve Officer of our regional board does not
agree that some of restrictions based on San Diego region
are correct . They have spent a lot of money on laboratory work_,
etc . but information being stored and not used .
Question : On What basis did Board of S-qpervisors adopt and se t
San Diego X~XQ§:X region a.s example?
Battin : Orange Cou~ty standiu:r.ds_, per report of Orange County
Flood Control ID{NXWX:Ki~f~ District_, a.re not as restrictive r/!!}if
as San Diego 's . Board of~~~ Superviso r s approved Right of
Way conditioned on tightening up of regulations to be at
leas t as stringent as San Diego region .
Hunt -the Execut i ve Officer of this regional board did not
have ~~~Na SD regional standards
Bas i c d i fferences between city of San Diego regulations adopted
December 8, 1960 are :
1 . They have a heavy metal limitation -we do not but
are presently working on a list 4 times the length
of thei rs
2 . Suspended solids -their waste water much weaker
and more domestic and less industrial; less suspended
solids coming into plant -1 25 parts per million
compared to Los Angele:s: 200 -30 0 parts per million -
ours approximately 150 parts per million
Presently we have much more knowledge than 10 years ago when
SD standards established. Both boards could set better standards
now . Our outfall regulations are much more stringent than
San Diego 's (70/100 compared to 10000/100)
Nissan -use of ROW can not be comditioned like this by BofS
Battin -feels that i t legally can be conditioned as stated
Meeting this am wi th liaison committee on setting regulations
for limitation on heavy metals . We have section of discharge
of toxic materials injurious to marine environment -reviewed
with regional board and SCCWRPA . Board of Supervisors report
based on staff report by Flood Control District -Question : Do
Board of Supervisors realize that agreement with Riverside is
protection that the i r discharge meets are discharge re quirements~
Staff will be pre senting amendment to ordinance more
restricti1ie than any oth e r oc ean discharger (most overal l
limiting o rdinance) -Will protect marine environment .
Send cover letter a long with t h is to Boa.rd of Supervis ors
and other entitie s telling them what we a.re doing , etc .
Go on r ecord defending our pos ition .
15b -Ruffing , Paul -ma.de p re ~ation of plans ~or
additi on to building
16 -Film shown on construction of ocean outfall -H. Hunt
all pipe is now i n place -rocking of pipe should be
completed by end of next we e k . Remedial work shoul d be
done two weeks
Executive Session
25 . Letter from Costa. Mesa. referred to executive commit t ee
for study .
) 38 . Nrbsson -temporary working license agreement with
Ba.ck Bay Park r enegoti ated -contractor has until 9th of July
ori g i nal negotiation set work to be completed not later than the
end of April -X1§.M'XMNIDi additional cost of right of way for month
of Apri l :$~X®:®: $3000 -$1 5 0 for each day in Ma.y, $200 for ea.ch
da.y in June -$267 for each day in July -some of these costs
will not be reimbursed by contractor .
5 3 -Grouting not r e quir ed -this is why big reduction in cost
55 . Three motions -sucessful in cost a.nd unsucessful on
other two (new t r ial and appeal) -accept sum of $7, 500 in lieu
of $8,500 plus cos t s if we agree not to app e al -
GJ1A/~ r1 /l1J I
Cotmty S'1nitat km Di stri cts
of O!oilg e C•.:nmty; Caiifornia
P. 0 . Box 5175
1081.tA Elli s Av enuP
Foun tain Valley, C il i F., 92708
(1)
(2)
§
(4)
(5 )
(6)
( '7 . . )
(8 \ . )
(9 )
(10)
JOI N T BOJ\RD~S
============--
Feb ruary 10, 1 9 71 -7 :30 p .m .
Pledge of Allegiance an.d Invo cation
Ro J.l Ca.11
ADJOURNMENTS POST ED./
COMP & MILE AGE ...... L ..
~1~:~L~~~o~;-~·iR~~o .. V-
LEnrns WRITTE N ..... V.:.
MINUTES WRITIEN .. ~ .•
MINUTES HLED ....... V.::: .. .
Appoi ntments of Chairmen pro tem, i:f necessary 'i) a-f\-:,"' # 5
DIS TRICT 1
-Conside1·ation of motion approving m1nu tes of the regul Ft.i' I
mee ting held January 13 , 1971 , and tl1e a.d,i ournecl meeting /Y) S
the r eof hd.J Ja.nu.a.:cy 28_, 1 971 , as ma iled
DISTRICT 2 )
Con.sid.(~rat i on o f ' mo-cior1 app roving minutes of ·t:.he r egular JV1 8
rneeti.ng held Ja.rma ry 13 , 1 97 1, as mailed
DISTRICT 3 I
C ori s:.i.derat j_on of' rn.ot,:wn app roving min utes of the rcguJ a.r /V1 S
meP~~.ing held Janua.ry 13, 19~(1.~ as ma.iJ.ed
DISTRICT 5 I -c·oris ide:i:·o~ti on of rJ.otion ap:!,;roving m:Lnutes of the regular M S
n"ee-i-i· ng h :..Jc' JaJ~11 a Y'v , -~ 1 9'7 , a'· r_n-"'i· ..L., erl II v -H::. -; v.C -v J.__,) --{ ..L ; .:> ~ "'-
DIS'.I'iUCT 6
~Consid2ra.tion of motion approving minutes
mec.;tj_ng held J"a.nuary 13.:. 1 97 1, a.s ma2.led
DIS'J:'nICT 7
o.f the regvla:c
Cons io.eZ.at 1.on of motion a.pproving rninut1;:;s of the r egular
meeting held Janua.:ry 13> 1971_, as mailed
DISTRIC'J: 11
-Con s Lleration of motj_on approving m:i_Eute s of the re gular
m eetin~ held Ja.nuary 1 3 , 1 9 '71, a s malled
ALL DI S 'l:I'.IC'TS
-'f-\eport of the Joj_nt Chairman
ALL DISTRI CTS
-J:~eport of t he Ge n e ra.1 Manager
ALL DISTH I C'TS
Rspori., of t11e Exe-: cu ti ve c:md Dull ding Connrd ttces , a.nd
cons:i..derat i on of motion to :cecei v e anci. file the Conrn.:L ttees 1
written report, ~
(15) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of ac t i on on items r ecomme nded by Executive
and Buildi n g Committees
(a) Consideration of Resolution No . 71-1 1,
approving pl ans and s pecifications for I
Modification of Parking Facilities for M S
Administration Building , Job No . Pl -12-5 ;
and authorizing advert ising for bids to be
opened March 3, 1 9 71 at 1 1 : 00 a .m; and
authorizing District No . 1 to award contra.ct .
See page 11 D11
Q Cons ideration of motion ap provi ng preliminary fV1 S
"Ptlns for Administration -Engineeri ng Building
Addition
(c) Con s ideration of motion authorizing the \
General Manager t o direct John Carollo Eng i nee rs M S
to prepare a report on t he fe asibility and
costs i nvolved in joint use with Irvine Ranc h
Water District in Districts ' disposal facilities ,
the cost o f said repor t to be reimbursed by
Irvi ne Ranch Water Dis trict
( d ) considerat i on of motion approving placing M\s
certain routine itef'.ls on a consent calendar; and
authori z ing t he General Cou nsel to p r epare an
amendment to 11 Rules a n d Procedures for .['.-ieetings 11
r el ative to the consent ca.lendar
(e) Consideration of motion directing the staff
r \..QJ to fully investigate a.nd develop a meaningful
~' wate r conse rvati un p rog ram within the Districts
@ Consideration of motion to r eceive and
orde r ed filed , Resolution No . F71 -2 of the
Boar d of Supe rvisors of the County of Orange ,
date d January 1 2 , 1971 , with r espect to j oint
use o f District facilities by Rivers ide County
Flood Control and Wate r Conse rvation Dj_strict ;
and consideration of Resolution No . 7 1 -13 ,
establishing policy with respect to protection
of benefic i al uses of ocean wate r and r equestin g
t he California Regional Water Quality Control
Board to review e x isting waste discharge
re quir emYfl~ See page.s _"E !' and 11 F 11
~ ~~t)~~~(}VJ\~ Q ALL DISTRICT S ,---CJ
~ Verbal report of Engineers on Ocean Outfal l No . 2 ,
Marine Section, Job No . J -1 0 , const r uct i on
ALL DISTRICTS
Con side r a tion of mot ion to r ece ive a nd f ile Quarte rly
Financial Report submitte d by Han s on, Peterson ,
Cow les and Sylvester , Certified Publ i c Accountants ,
f or the period endj_ng Sep t ember 30 , 1970, prevlously
mailed to Dir ec tors
((18)) ALL DISTRICTS
~ Conside ration o:!:' r~10tlon to r ece iv e and file report of
Director of Fina.nee on mid -year budget review
-2 -
(19 ) ALL DI STR I CTS
(20 )
Conside r at i on of mo tion app r ov i ng Ch ange Or d e r No . 1,
t o p lans and specifi cations f or 7 50 KVA Dist ribution
Se r vice T r ans f orme r for Plant No . 2 _, Job No . J -4 -A_, l
grant i ng a11 extens i on of time of 8 calendar day s to N\ S
t he con t ract with Gene r al Elect r i c Supp l y Company .
See p age 11 G" ·---
ALL DI STR I CTS
Co n sideration of mot i on to receive and file l e t te r s 1
f rom John Carollo Engineers and Peter Kiewit Sons 1 A~ S
Company , and grant i ng a. one da.y time extension for iv I
completion of Ocean Outfal l No . 2 -Marine Sect i o n_,
Job No . J -1 0 . See pages "H" and 11 I 11
(21) ALL DISTR I CTS
Cons i de r a.tJon of mot i on auth or i z i ng attendan ce of I
on e staf f member a t a. join t mee t ing of t he Association
o f Met r opolitan Sewe r ing Agencies and the Water Al1
Po l l ution Control Federation i n Wash i n g ton_, D.C. /'I S
March 1 5th and 16th; and authorizing payment
for travel, me a.ls , l odging and inc i dental expenses
incurred
(22 ) ALL DISTRIC TS
Conside rati o n of mot i on accepting proposal o f
J ohn Carollo Engineers _, dated February 3, 1 971 ,
for engi neering services for the preparation of
plans a.nd specifications for Interim Pump Station
and Addition s to Bypass Facilities at Plant No . 1 ,
Job No . I ·-7 -3 , fo1· a. fee not to e xc eed $10 ,500 , as
r ecomme n ded by the s t aff . See page 11 J 11
(23) ALL DI STR I CTS
Consideration of mot i on to receive and file
cert i fics,tion of the Gen e ra.l Ma.na.ger that he fV\ S
has c heck e d a.11 bills appearing on the agenda._,
foun d them to be in order_, and that he recommends
a u thorization for payment
(24 ) ALL DISTRICTS
\ Con s idera.tj.on of motion approvi ng Joint Operat i ng_,
~\ Ca.pi ta.l Outla.y Re volv i ng, and Construction I nspec t ion r Revo l ving Fund warrant bool<s for signature of the
Chairman of District No . l,and authorizing payment
of c l aims listed on page 11 A"
Q ALL DI STR I CTS Q Other business and communicat i o n s , i f any ...____P
(26 )
(27)
DISTR I CTS 1 & 7 Con ~iderati on of Resolution No . 7 1 -1 4 , approv i ng l
I nter-District Basic Construct i on, Maintenance , /\/\ $
and Opera.ting Agreement , 1~e1a ti ve to Ma.in -Dyer r ' \
I nt erceptor, Contract No . 1 -12 . See page "K"
DISTF.ICTS 1 & 7
Cons i deration of Resolution No .. 7 1-2 1, ~uthor i zing \
exe cu ti on of a t.eHFft-e-:e-~w:G-~~J-'k'lfi'@ with A. J . fl\ S
Gi sler , et al, in connec t ion with construction of
Sunflower Intercepto r , Contract No . 7 -6 -1 , for a
tota.l cost of $1 , 659 . 00 . See page "L __ 11
__
) ~ 1../7, ~
-3-
(28) DISTR I CTS 1 & 7 ..
Consideration of Re solution No . 71-22 , aut horizing /\/11
acceptance of easemept from A. J . Gisler , e t a.l , ''I S
in connecti on with construc t ion of Sunflower Interc e pto ,
Contract No . 7 -6-1 , for a totai cos t of $14 ,694 .oo .
See page 11 M11
(29) DISTRICTS l & 7
Consideration of motion approving suspense f und /\A 0
war rant s , if any . See page 11 C11 f 'I ()
(30) DIST RICT 1
Consideration of mo tion accepting proposal of Boyle
Engine e ring, dated February 4 , 1971 , for engineering
services for the preparation of plans and specifications
for Ma.in -Dyer Interceptor , Contra.ct No . 1 -12, fo r a
basic fee of $23,10 0 .00, a.s r e comme nded by the s taff .
See page 11 N11
(31) DI STRICT 1
Consideration of Resolution No . 71-19-1, autho ri zing
execution of Quitclaim Deed to A. J . Gisler, relative
to construction of Sunflowe r Inte rc eptor Sewer ,
Con tra.ct No . 7 -6 -1 . S ee page 11 0 11
(3 2 ) DISTRICT 1
Cons i deration of Resolution No . 7 1 -20 -1, a uthorizing "/\ 0 acceptance o f easement from A . J . Gis le r, rel a.t i ve / v I 0
to construction of Sunflower I nterceptor Sewer ,
Contract No . 7-6-1. See page 11 p 11
( 3'2N_ DI ~I CT °h ~~ '"othe)~busi~ss ~d
(35) DISTRI CT 1
Cons i oera.tion of motion to adjourn t o Tuesday , Febru ary IV\ S
23, 1 97 1 a.t 5 : 00 p . m. Q 1 () 0 , , ("' p,w-z_·
DIST RICT 5
-Conside ration of Resolution No . 71-15 -5, approv i ng
annexation of' t e rritory to the District, ''Annexation
No . 4 to County Sanit ation District No . 5 ". See
page 11 Q"
-=-(~7-+-flli¥.PRf€I:P-5-
=-&ens-:L de r a.t-:i.. 0n o-f-rne-tion_app.r:n_~, i f any .
--See page ''B 11
e D~~~=~C~u~i n ess and communica.ti ons , if a.ny '
(3 9 ) DISTRICT 5
Con s i de ration of motion to adjourn q',i~ ~-'("(\ ·
(40) DISTRICT 6
-Ge-:r:rs-i deration of rnotion approving wa.rr am=-s,---i--~.
S e-e-p-age----1!-·(-7-'-'-1 1 ~~~~-
-LJ.-
(42) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(43) DISTRICT 7 ~
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. M S
See page "c" ·
(~4) DIST~ICT 7. . . . ~ B . .t_he'r. bus~~s~~olbmy~a~'-_ i~an)\,
( 45) DrsrrRICT 7
Consiaeration of motion to adjourn to Tuesday, February
23, 1971 at 5:00 p.m.
{46) DISTRICr:E1 11
C\I ~L\ ~ ~ -'('('\ •
Cons.id€sra.tion of motion a.pp roving warrants, if any·•
_See page II c"
(47) DISTRICTS 3 & 11
fund f"\\ S Consideration of motion approving suspense
warrants, if any. See page "B"
( 4~ DIS~RICT 11 \ . ' -~Other busin~s ~comht~nic~~tiops,\2-f any
( 49) DISTRICT 11 Oi • l1 Lt
Consideration of motion to .adjourn \ £ -1 \
(50)
(51)
(52)
(54)
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motim approving Change Order No. 3,
to the plans and specifications for Westside Interceptor
Facilities, Los Alamitos Pumping Station, Contract No. J
3-12, granting an extension of time of 29 calendar
days to the contra.ct with Merco Construction Engineers. fV1 S
See page "R"
DIS·rRICT 3
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2, )
to the plans and specifications for Westside In~erceptor S
Facilities, Westminster Avenue Force Main -First Unit, fi1
Contract No. 3-13, granting an extension of time of
30 calendar days to the contract with J. L. Scott
Company. See page 11 s 11
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3, ..
to the plans and specifications for Westside Interceptor )
Facilities, Westminster Avenue Interceptor Sewer, fV1 S
Contract No. 3-14, authorizing an deduction of $564.oo,
from the contract with K. E.. C. Company. See page
"T"
Consideration of motion approving Cha..Dge Order No. 4, ISTRICT 3 l
to the plans and specifications for Westside Interceptor fV1 .S
Facilities, Westminster Avenue Interceptor Sewer,
Contract No. 3-14, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's
quantities and a deduction of $31,274.50, to the contract
with K. E .. c. Company. See page II U11
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of Resolution No. 71-16-3, accepting
Westside Interceptor Facilities, Westminster Avenue
Interceptor SeNer, Contract No. 3-14, as complete;
and authorizing execution of a. Notice of Completion
therefor. See page "v"
-5-
..
0 DISTRICT 3 ·· ~ Report of the Gene ral Counsel on Case No . 160579,
City of Westminster vs . Dist r ict No . 3, et al
(56) DISTRICT 3
<:,/ Consideration of motion authoriz i ng payment of
~) ~\ $7,500 to the City of Westminste r i n settlement
2.. 1't1 o f Case No . 160579 ; and authori zing t h e General
,_. t-Counsel to sign a wa rrant demand for said amount
M\s
(57) DISTRICT 3 .
Considere.tion of Resolution No . 71-1 7 -3, approving 1
>..._V specifications for One , 10 " Vert ic al Sewage Pump , M S
~~ Contract No . 3 -12-A; and authorizing advertising
' for bids to be opened February 26, 1971 at 11 :00 a .m.
See page "W"
(58) DISTRICT 3 \
Consideration of mot ion app r oving warrants, if any . /\/\ S
See page "B" Iv I
(~) NSTRI-CT 3 , -\
O"ther '1'1usiitE«ss 'and cow.muni ~tions..., if aj'.ly
....__ ~ ~ ~ "-... ~~ '-'
(60) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of mot ion to a.djourn 9 ~ Y 5 ? · vY1 '
~DISTR ICT 2 ~) Consideration of motion to rec eive and file letter
from Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District , dated January 20 , 1971 ,
requesting extension of time for financ ing its share
of Santa. Ana River I nterc ep tor and purchase of
plant capa.ci ty; a.nd consideration of Resolution
No . 71 -18 -3, approving Second Amendment to Waste
Water Interceptor Capacity Agreement with Riverside
County Flood Cont r ol and Water Conservation District
and authori zing e xecution of said Amendment . See
pages "X" and 11 y 11
Q DISTRICT 2 0 Verbal report by staff on federal and state grants
for Santa Ana River Inte rc eptor from Plant No . 1
t o Katella Avenue, Contracts Nos . 2 -14-1, 2 -1 4 -2,
and 2 -14-3
(6;\ DISTRICT 2 . V Consideration of Resoluti on No . 71 -1 0 -2, authori zing
and directing execution of filing of documents necessary
for federal grant under 33 USC, 466 Et Seq and State
Grant under Clean Water Bond Law of 1 970, for Contra.ct s
Nos . 2 -1 ~--l, 2 -14-2, and 2-14-3, Santa Ana River Interceptor
from Plant No . 1 to Katella Avenue . See page "z " ----
(64 ) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of mo tion accepting proposal of Lowry
and Associ ates , dated Ja.nua.ry 25 , 1971, fo r engineering
services -Santa. Ana River Interceptor from Pl ant
No . 1 to Katella Avenu e , Cont r ac ts Nos . 2-14 -1 , 2 -14-2,
and 2-14-3, a.s r ecomm e nde d by the staff , for <:.b asic f ee of
$283 ,420 .00 ; and direct ing the Gen e ral Counsel to prepare
an agreement for exec ution . See p age "AA 11
-6 -
(65) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion authorizing the General
Manager to nego tiate · a n agre ement for so i ls
investigation se rvi ces in connection with Santa
Ana River Intercept or from Plant No . 1 to Ka.tella
Av e n ue , Contracts Nos . 2 -l 4 -l, 2 -14 -2 , and 2 -14-3,
with Geolab s -California, Inc ., for an amount not
to exceed $15,000.00. See page "B:a "
(66) DISTR I CT . 2 \
Consideration o f motion approving warrants, i f any . M 5
See page "B"
( 6Z ) pI RIC 2 ""-~ Otn r bu in~~~n i~t ·ons ,~f~nY\,
(68 ) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion t o adjourn /l ~ ~ r / 5 . S 0
-7-
Mee ting Date ~2 ~\QI :::i I Time q::=zio Distric.'t ~
DISTRICT 1 ' JOI NI' BOARD S
Gris et / Herrin Culver
Miller ./ Coco ---Arbiso Lewis
Porter 7 Baum Bog a r d
Battin tPifj_ Berton Westra
5 Chr i stie Root
DISTRICT 2 Clark Magnu s
Davis Bousman
Just / Harper Ste p he nson Du t t on
Christie j Root Finnel l Gomez ' ,lark 7 Magnus Gibbs
0ulver .,/ Green ---Shiple y
Stephenson ":) Dutton Gris et Herrin
F inne l l 7 Gomez Harvey Kanel
Herri n 7 Gris et Herrin Gris e t
Sims ./ Zuniga Hirth Croul
Smith Hileman Hyde Kroes en
Wedaa ~ Machado J ust Harper
Winn f;t Schniepp Mc Inn is Hi rth
Battin McWhinney
Miller Coco DISTRICT 3 ---Parsons
Culver ., Porter
Arbiso / Lewis Rogers Hirth
Baum ,; Hogard Shipley Coen
Berton (,v Westra Sims Zuni g a
Christ i e .; Root Smith Hileman
Cla.rk 'l Magnus ---Wedaa ---Machado
Davis 'J Bousman Winn Schni ep:
Stephenson ,/ Dutto n --Battin
Green / Shiple y
Harvey ./ Kan el
Herrin I Griset * * * ,'(-* * Hyde ./ Kroe s en Mitche l l
Just ,/ Harper Boyd ---Goldb er1
'1cWhinney ./ ---
ims --;;-Zuniga OTHE RS
Ba ttin u; ,/ :> Harp e r
DI STRICT 5 Bro wn ./ uJ-Sylv e s ter v
~ J Carlson c::
Hirth-=1f Croul Clarke 7
Battin Dunn v
Finster V'
DISTRICT 6 Galloway /
Hohen er --v-
Porter ./ Hunt /1..
Mc Innis ./ Hirth Keith ../
Battin ().._,, Lowry ,/
Maddox v
DISTRICT 7 Martinson ./
Nisson ~
Miller .,/ Coco Piersall
Gris et / He rrin Sigl er ~
Porter Steve n s
Ro g ers ../ Hj_rth Crabb / ---Smith ./ Hileman
Ba ttin .~
T)I STRICT 11
Shiple y =Ii Co e n
Gibb s ---
Battin
Goldbe r g
\
Meeting Date ~.ffii_ T:ime ']·· 3(J Dj_ s trict r~ a\\
DI STRICT 1 .. _:::__;!!-_ JOI NT BOARDS --·-------·-
~/ i~ V' Gr is e t Herrin Culver
Miller i /"" Coco Arb i so ·~/ Le wis
Por ter ~v Baum -±_ Hogard
Battin Be r ton Westra ---Ch ristie \L Root
DI ST RI CT 2 ---Cl ark =±Magnus ---Davis Bousman
Just ,/,. Harper Step h e nson v Dutton
Chris tie ~Ro ot Finnell v Go mez
""'.lark < Magnus Gib bs v
0u lver -·--@:ifili:7 ShipJey --------::Q,
Stephens on 1/ Dutton Gris e t l / Herrin
Finnell f>< Gomez Harvey 1./ Kanel
Herrin Gris et He rrin l,/ Gris e t ~ Sims 1/ Zuni ga Hirth ~ Croul
Smith V Hi lema n Hyde Kroes en
Wedaa ?\ Machado J ust V"' Harper
Wi nn ,/ Schniepp Mc Innis 1/ Hirt h
Battin ~/ McWh i nney _±..
DISTRICT 3 Miller Co c o
Par sons
Cul ver v . ---Po r ter
Arbiso 1/ Lew is Rog e r s ~ Hir th Baum 1/ Bogard Shipley Coen.
Berton _a_ Westra Sims Zuni ga,
Christie v Ro ot Smith v Hileman
Cl ark v Ma g nus ------Wedaa ~M ac hado
Davi s 6-Bous man Winn Schniep:
Stephenson Dutton ----Bat t in ~ ---Green ~-Shi p l ey
Harvey 1./ Kane l
He rrin i / Grise t * * * -)(-* * Hyd e v Kroes en Mi t chell
Ju st v · Harper Boyd Go l db er1
"1c Wh i nney \./ ---t>i ms \7 Zuniga OT HERS
Ba.ttin ((1/ -----Harp e r
DISTRICT 5 • Brown
~ Sylvester
7' Par sons ~~-~ Carl son
Hirth Croul Cl arke -~ Battin •v Dunn
Finster
DI STR I C·r 6 Galloway
~ Ho h ene r
Porte r Hunt
Mc Inni s I/ Hirth Ke ith
Battin i!-V Lowry
Maddox
DIS1rRICT 7 Marti n son
:::> Ni ssan
Miller ~ Coco Piersal l
Gris et v He rrin Sigler
Po r ter 1/ Steve ns --Crabb Ro ge rs v Hirth
Smith __J/ Hileman CY-o t1 v Battin E/ --
DISTRICT 11 v ----Shipley Coen
Gibbs ;li/'· Battin --·----
DIS'I'RICT ---
Bo yd Goldb e r g ------Mitche l l ---Ba.tth). ------
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
February 10, 1971 -7:30 p.m.
WARRANT NO.
14814
14815
14816
"'!+817
'-!t4818
14810
14820
14821
14822
14823
14824
14825
14826
14827
14828
1482g
l~-830
14831
14832
14833
14834
14835
14836
14837
14838
1483g
ll-~840
14841.
1 4842
~843
14844
14845
14846
14847
14848
llt949
14850
14851
14852
14853
14854
14855
14856
14857
14858
14859
14860
14861
14862
14863
14864
llt865
14866
1 L1.867
~·+868
J_4869
14870
14871
14872
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
A-1 Stanton Rentals, Equipment Rental $
AMSA, 1971 Membership (MO 1-13-71)
Adept Mfg., Inc., Pump Parts
All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings
Allied Bolt t£ Supply, Small Hardware
Amoco Chemicals, Lab Supplies
City of Anaheim, Power
The Anchor Packing Co., Pump Parts
Anaheim Dodge, Truck Parts
Apco Supply, Controls
Aquatic Center, Air Card
Associated Concrete Products, Manhole Sections
Ra~ph W. Atkinson Co., Pump Parts
Barksdale, Valve Parts
Bearing Specialty Co., Pump Parts
Becker Pump & Engr. Co., Pump Bearings
Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repairs
Bird Machine Co., Centrifuge Parts
Blower Paper Co., Janitorial Supplies
Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Magneto Repairs
Buck's Welding Works, Westside Bypass Welding
C & R Reconditioning Co., Pump Repair
Certified Labs, Inc., Chemicals
College Lumber Co., Inc., Small Hardware
Compressor Systems, Inc., Freight In
Colsolidatec Elect. Dist., Inc., Electrical Supplies
Consolidated Freightways, Freight
Continental-Emsco Co., Truck Parts
Constructors Supply Co., Small Hardware & Tools
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
Deaver Mfg. Co., Truck Parts
John M. Deck Co., Small Hardware
Diesel Control Corp., Governor Repairs
Don's Lawn Mower Shop, Equipment Repair
Clark Dye HardwaYe, Small Tools
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies
Enterprise Printing Co., Printing Supplies
Fiberglass Specialties, Panels for Sed. Basins
Fischer & Porter Co., Chlor. Parts & Controls
Foss Co., Lab Supplies
Fowler Equipment, Inc., Equipment Rental
Fredson Co., Truck Parts
Freeway Machine & Weldi~g Shop, Machining
City of Fullerton, Water
GAF Corp., Reproduction Supplies
Gaines Electric Supply Co., Electrical Equipment
Gar Wood Truck Equipment, Truck Equipment
Garden Grove Lumber & Cement Co., Bldg. Materials
General Electric Supply Co., Electrical Supplies
General Telephone Co.
Georgia-Pacific Corp., Chlorine
Glidden-Durkee Co., Paints
Goldenwest Fertilizer Co., Grit Removal
Goodall Rubber Co., Safety Supplies
Graybar Electric Co., Inc., Electrical Supplies
Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Parts & Repair
Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting & C.O.D. Expense
Barron, Rickard & McCone Co., Equipment Rental
William P. Hayden, Employee Mileage
A-l
AMOUNT
100.00
1,250.00
120.00
191.10
203.05
140.40
12.50
472.79
11.54
21.11
15.50
1,201.69
25.11
633.22
146. 63
26.25
163.50
216.85
79.96
402.62
898.00
95.00
85.75
259.76
13.65
894.95
97.66
77.93
839.23
510.17
37.80
17.68
195.68
88.39
22.09
119.30
63.84
1, 76l+. 00
3,164.86
21. 00
1,657.38
41. 66
512.40
4.14
495.76
2,127.30
443.76
153.35
246.27
856.41
31,884.83
1Li2. 24
768.00
155.30
222.60
122.64
149.04
207.70
30.30
WARRANT NO.
11+873
14874
14875
14876
14877
~·1+878
~879
14880
14881
14882
14883
14884
14885
14886
14887
14888
14889
lh890
14891
llt892
11+893
11.i.894
14895
14896
14897
14898
14899
14900
14901
14902
,4903
~90Li-
1l.j.905
14906
14907
14908
14909
14910
14911
14912
14913
1491lt
11.i-915
14916
14917
14918
14919
14920
14921
14922
1.lt923
1492lt
14925
14926
14927
1 J+928
-929 ~930
14931
lh932
llt933
llt934
IN FAVOR OF
Health Education Service, OJT Manuals $
Hertz Equipmental Rent.al-Corp., W/Side Equip. Rental
Hill Brothers Chemical Co., Odor Control
Honeywell, Inc., Telemetry Supplies & Controls
Howard Supply Co., Small Hardware
City of Huntington Beach, Water
International Harvester Co., Truck Parts
Johns-Manville, IAb Supplies
Johnston Pump Co., New Pump
Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Valves, Small Hardware
Fred Keiser, Employee Mileage
Kelco Sales & Engr. Co., Valves & Small Hardware
Kerm Rima Hardware, Small Hardware
King Bearings, Inc., Bearings & Pump Parts
Kingmarrn-vlh i te, Inc. , Telemetry Supplies
Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts
Kleen-Li~e Corp., Janitorial Supplies
Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Tools & Hardware
LBWS, Inc., Small Tools & Supplies
L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Services
Lakewood pj_pe Servi.ce, Inc., W/Side Piph1g (MO 1/13/71)
Judy Lee, Employee Mileage
Leupold & Stevens, Inc., Telemetry Supplies
R. W. McClellan & Sons, I~c., Bldg. Material
M.AoV. Transportation, Freight
Mesa Supply, Small Hardware
The Metz Co., Sign .
Mine Safety Appliances Co., Safety Equipment
Mobil Oil Corp., Gear Lube
Moore Systems Div., Metering EquipLlent
E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Sections
Jean Mosher, Employee Mileage
Herbert A. Moss, Special Labor Counsel Retainer
Nelson-Dunn, Inc., Engine Parts
Newark Electronics Corp., Electrical Supplies
City of Newport Beach, Water
C . .Arthur Hisson, General Counsel Retainer, CSSDA Conf.
Noland Paper Co., Inc., Reproduction Paper
Oakite Products, Inc., Solvents
Orange County Chemical Co., Solvents
Orange County Radiotelephone Serv1ce, Inc.
Orange County Wholesale Electric., Electrical Supplies
PrE Corp., Conveyor Parts
Pacific Telephone
Pickwick Bookshops, Lab Manuals
Pictorial Sciences, Inc., Aerial Photos
Postmaster, Postage
Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage
Rainbow D!sposal Co., Trash Disposal
The Register, Employinent J.~d
Santa Ana Electric Motors, New Motor
Santa Electronics Co., Electrical Supplies
Scientific Products, Lab Supplies
S. F. Serrantino, Employee Mileage
Sherwin-Williams Co., Paints & Supplies
A. H. Shipkey, Inc., Truck Tires
John Sigler, Employee Mileage
Signal-Flash Co., Barricade Rental
Southern California Edison Co., Power
Southern California Gas Co.
Southern California Water Co.
Sparkletts Co., Bottled Water
A-2
AMOUNT
34.50
121.50
56.60
718.83
363.38
8.03
267.44
67.70
1,270.50
782.2li
78.90
78.78
18.18
155.17
42.18
1,708.92
179.69
257.50
1,103.62
1,877.27
6,249.79
22.50
36.87
199.50
8.30
411.82
525.20
560. 86
22.52
73.50
259.90
17.85
250.00
156.44
48.46
9.00
960.25
232.16
92.98
10.8'7
322.63
330.75
77.39
341-t. 05
9.40
822.19
500.00
46.02
60.00
114.94
230.30
75.05
155.72
56.lt6
121. 05
92.07
l+o. 62
148.90
15,672.13
l_, 248. 83
11+7. 62
72.77
WARRANT NO.
14935
14936
14937
14938
14939
'+940
~4941
1491+2
14943
14944
14945
14946
14947
14948
14949
14950
ll~951
14952
14953
14954
14955
14956
14957
l"-1-958
14959
14960
14961
14962
14963
14964
14965
l~-966
14967
l~-968
14969
14970
14971
14972
lh973
14974
14975
14976
14977
14978
14979
14980
IN FAVOR OF
Speed-E-Auto Farts, Truck Parts
Standard Oil Co., Gasoline & Oil
Standard Ready Mix Concrete, Concrete
Sully-Miller Co., Ashpalt
T & H Equipment Co., Tractor Parts
~ell Steel Inc., Steel Plate
Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Bldg. Material
Tustin Plumbing & Heating, Lateral Repair
Tustin Water Works, Water
Union Oil Co., Gasoline
Utilities Supply Co., Sweeper Parts
Valvate Associates, Freight
Vaniman Camera, Photo Processing
John R. Waple3 R.S., Odor Consultant
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts & Repair
Robert A. Webber, Employee Mileage
Russell H. Wheat Co., Small Hardware
Whitlock Mfg. Co., New Heat Exchangers (MO 8/12/70)
John V. A. Williams, Employee Mileage
Willig Equipment Co., Tractor Parts
Wilson Engine & Equip. Co., Engine Parts
Howard Wilson Co., Machine Equipment
Michael J. Wilson, Employee Mileage
Russ Wold, Employee Mileage
World Travel Bureau, Inc., CSSDA & State Grant Mtg.
Danald J. Wright, Employee Mileage
Xerox Corp., Reproduction
George Yardley Co., Compressor Parts
Everett H. York Co., Engine Parts
Zep Mfg. Co., Janitorial Supplies
TOTAL JOINT OPE~TING
CAPrrAL OUTI.J\Y REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
AMOUNT
$ 540.46
1,185.12
192.19
48.05
276.28
177.36
57.19
425.50
11.69
39.11
35.31
10.05
88.80
216.20
1,027.82
35.94
50.00
6,027.00
73.10
27.38
309.30
91.00
53.70
65.94
129.96
8.172
732.h3
81.72
}+·75. 52
37.54
$ 107,587.89
John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Serv. -Plant Const. $
Carollo & Keith, Engr. I-8
42,923.84
14,359.00
Fae. 8,324.13
64.33
5,348.28
9,403.20
64,591.32
William P. Ficker, AIA, Architect -Adm, Engr, Veh.
Freedom Newspapaer, Inc., Bid Notice Pl-1Rl/P2-1Rl
General Electric Supply Co., Contractor J-4A
J.E. Hoagland & W.W. Hoaeland, Contractor P2-16
Hood Corp., Contractor Pl-15/P2-15
Peter Kiewit Sons' Co., Contractor J-10
LBWS, Inc., Machine Equipment
Lynam-Wo::>d Const., Inc., Contractor P2-18
Near-Cal Corp., Contractor J-11
Pacific Pipe Tool, Line Clean Equipment
Dutch Stark Co., Electric Carts (MO 1/13/71)
Al Thompson Pump & Equip8, Submersible Pump
Twining Labs, Testing P2-18
Wallace Trade Bindery Co., Plans & Specs. P2-17/Pl-1R-l
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING $
A-3
44,740.00
1,109.30
3,742.15
2,004.27
293.49
5,071.50
130.99
27.80
258.56
202,392.16
WARRANT NO.
OCEAN OUTFALL f/2
CONSTHUCTION INSPECTION REVOLVING FUND
IN FAVOR OF
Osborne Labs, Inc., Inspection J-10
Parker Diving Service, Inspection J-10
TOTAL INSPECTION REVOLVING
TOTAL JOINT WARRANTS
A-l~
$
$
$
AMOUWI.1
11.4. 00
17,316.41
17,360.41
327,340.46
Wl\RRANT NO.
14983
14985
14986
14987
iJ-1-988
14989
14990
ll-1.991
1 LJ.992
~993 11+994
14995
DISTRICT NO. 2
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR o:p
Lowry & Associates, Engineer 2-14 $
DISTRICT NO. 3
OPERl\TING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
C. Arthur Nissan, Legal Service -Westminster Suit $
Cook & Barletta, Inc., Contractor 3-15
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL ourrLAY FUIID WARR11NTS
IN FAVOrt OF
Anaheim Bulletin, Bid Notice -Vert. Drive Systems $
Boyle Engineering, Engr. & Survey 3-11
K.E.C. Co., Contractor 3-14
Merco Const. Engr., Contr~ctor 3-12
Osborne Labs, Inc., Testing 3-14
J. L. Scott Co., Contractor 3-13
Twining Labs., Testing 3-12 & 3-14
Zarubica Co., Release Retained Percentage 3-11
AMOUNT
2,110.83
254.50
684.46
7.36
16,073.05
70,953.75
33,858.00
18.75
11,000.CO
108.50
60,432.04
$ 192,451.45
$ 193,390.41
DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11
SUSPENSE Futm ~vARRANTS
IN F/NOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Engineer 3-17 $ 6,879.00
-R-
WJ\RRANT NO.
i4996
~
14997
14998
14999
15000
"'f-)001
.._,,,;
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND W.ARRANTS
IN FJ\VOR OF
Boyle Engineerir.g~ Engr. Serv., Plan Check & Insp. $
AMOUNT
878.19
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Irvine Industrial Complex, Refund Insp. Deposit
Irvine I~dustrial Complex, Reimb. Agreement
DISTRICT3 NOS. 1 & 7
SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineerj_n8, Engr. 7-6-1/7-6-2
Enterprise Printing Co., Plans & Specs. 7-6-1
Wallace Trade Bindery Co., Plans & Specs. 7-6-1
-C·-
$ 878.19
$ 306.25
108,641.41
$ 108, 91n. 66
$ 16,980.00
60.80
65 .1~2
$ 17,106.22
RESOLUTION NO. 'll-l;L
APPROVING PLANS ANTI SPECIFICATIONS FOR
JOB NO. Pl-12-5
A RESOLUTION OF THE-BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DIS1°RICTS NOS. 1, 2,
3,·5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY~
CJi.I..:FGfu.;~A., APPi\0-v l_l~J PLrl.~~3 fu~IJ SFECIFICATIGNS
FOR MODIFICATION OF PARKING FACILITIES
FOR ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, JOB NO. Pl-12-5
****"***
The Boa.rd of Directors of County Sanitation· Districts Nos.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and
contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors
by Districts' Engineers, for Modificatioq of Parking Facilities
for Administration Building, Job No. Pl-12-5, a.re.hereby
approved and adopted; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed
to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisi_ons
of the Health and Safety Code of the State of Califor~ia; and,
Section 3. That said bids will be received untiJ_ 11:00 a.m.,
March 3, 1971, at which time said bids will be publicly opened
and read; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts'
Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards
of Directors.
Section 5. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby
authorized to award contract for said Job No. Pl-12-5, on behalf
of these Boards of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting February 10, 1971.
Agenda Item #15a -D-All Districts
·11
II
1 !
2 I
31
4 I
511
611
7 r
81
91 I
·10 I
RESOLUTION OF THE BOA~D OF SUPERVISORS OF
THE COUNTY Of. OHAt~GE, CALIFORNl!,1 ACTil:W
ALSO AS THE GOVERJ'aNG BOAim CF THE ORANGE
COUNTY FLOOD co:\1TROL DISTRICT
Januar.y 1.2, i971
On motion of Superv~sor Baker, duly seconded and carried, the
following Resolution was ~dopted:
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County. of Orange ha.s
certain responsibilities regarding the maintenance or enhancement of tl1e
ocean environment along the County's shores; and
WHEREAS, in the O:range County Flood Control Act the. Legislnturc
11 of the State of California h~s designated the Board of Supervisors -0£
12 Orange County as the governing board for the Orange County Flood Control
1311 District; and
·14 I
20
21
22
23 I I
I
?4 I
-11
25 '1
26
27
2s I
29 I
~301'
31
I I 32 I
CUP~ sd l
• 1031-1 11
I,
II
li.IBEREAS, said District owns rights of ·way i1'.1 and along port.ions
of the Santa Ano. River from the P_acific Ocean to-the Metropolit~n. 't·7c:"'.ter
Dir:tr.:ict outlet t·~;o nr.d onc-hclf miles up,strema from Imr.-c::ci:J.l Higi1wny;
and
WHEREAS, County Sanitations Districts No. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, .. 7 oi.nd
11 of Orange County have previously entered into a waste ~a~er treatment
and disposal agreement with ti~Le Riverside County Flood Control «.md W&ter
Conservation District providing for accepting, trea~ing and disposing of
indust~~:i.nl and other waste waters from the Santa Ana River draina0e area
upRtream fro~n Pr-::!.do Reservoir; a.nd
WrlEREAS, County ?anitation District No. 2 of Orange County h-3£
entered into a waste water intercepto~ capacity agreement with Riverside
County Flood Control ar.<l WP.ter ConSE;T'V~tion District by ,,.,~·hich ~~.id
district will provide additional capacity in its proposed Santa Ana River
Interceptor Line into which said Flood Control District r.i.ay empty ind'u~;~·
trial and other waste waters; and
\anIEREAS, it has previously been contemplated tha.t said inter .. ,
ceptor line will be located in part within lands owned by the Orc:ff.lEe
Rer.olution No. F71-2
PolL-;y D~cisi_~n -LocAti.on
of s:~nitati.on TrlI71k Lines on
Flcod Control Dir::trict Right-
of-\:.o.y
Agenda Item #15f E-1 All Districts
1
2
~ 3
,{ " '"I
5
6
7.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
_, > w ...
!L ~ 7
O· 15
County Flood Control District; and
WHEREAS, the disposal o.f vraste water into the Pacific Ocean by
said Sanitation Districts of Orange County is regulated by the California
RegS_onal vhd.:er ~uality Control Board, Sci.nta Ana }{egion; and
WHEREAS, said Regional Bo1.1rd has prcv.iously adopted Resolution
No. 59-5 (3-68) wh:i ch set forth certain beneficial ocean uses to b2 pro ...
tectE~d, inc lu<ling, aeot:het:ic enj oymGnt, water contact sports, sport fish-
ing, shell fish harvesting, propagation and sustenance of aquatic life
and kelp propagation, and has provided a certain requirement relatable
to the operation_ of said proposed nonreclaimable industrial waste line
as folloHs:
"B-9. The discharge shall not result in the presence
of toxic materials in the water in amounts that are
deleterious to fish, plant or aquat·lc life.':
and
w~ ~ U l!I 16
I:. > C> WHEREAS, said Regional Board Resolution No. 59-5 (3-68) does
:l. ... z
0 z <
:> a: eo 17 not specify.limits of the various toxic materials which may be disposed
18 of in the Pacific Ocean, nor does said Resolution provide any requirement
19 for surveillance, testing or detecting the presence of toxic materials·
20 as a result of the discharge into the ocean;
21 NOW,. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
22 1. Recognizing the desirability for segregating certain waste
23 in the Santa Ana Ri~er Basin above Prado Reservoir in order to prevent
24 its introduction into surface and groundwater supplies affecting water
25 users in San B~rnardino, Riverside and Orange Counties, it it the policy
26 cf the County 'of Oi·c.mge and the Orange County Flood Control District to
27 coop8rate j_n its accomplishment.
...._.,..28 2. This Board has local responsibilities in additi.on to
29 regio;nal respoL1s ibi. lities and is not necessarily in sympathy with the
30 tran~fer of the waste disposal problem from inland waters to coastal
31 lJaters unless adequate safeguards are cis sun~d.
32 I I
I
FI 031-1 I
II .. ~..penda. Item #15f E-2. All Districts
1
2
~ :1
5
6
7
8·
9
10
11
12
13
14
J> w I-
IL 111 Z 0 z .... 15
w
~~ 16 IL > C ... !: z 0 .... c(
:> 0: 17 eo
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
~
29
30
31
32
F 1031 ·I
I
3. It is the intention of this Board to authorize the use of
the right of way of the Or~nge County Flood Control l)istrict along the
Santa Ana River for the installation of a nonrecoverable waste pipeline,
. .
rroviderl the CaJ-i_f0:.~ni.C1 P.cglon;il F3.to: Q•J<.l:Lty Control ::::ie:_:d, S::.~::~:..:. .. "~!:-~:.
Region, adopts standards .for the placing of waste ·waters in the Pac~fic
Oceun which are at least as rigid as those adopted by Regional Water
Quality Control Board No. 9, and provided further th.'.1t the ree;ul.e.tions
of said Santa Ana Regional Board are const~ntly increased as research
indicates it is feasible.
4. This Board does hereby petition the Santa Ana Regional
Water Quality Control Board to adopt stricter regulations no less rigid
than those adopted by Regional Water Qual~ty Control Board No. 9, and
to control and monitor these regulAtions.
5. This Bo3rcl does hereby petition the Orange County Sanitu-
tion District Boards to join ~ith this Bqard in the petition to the
S .. :r~ta Anf?,
6. Members of our legislative delegation f~om Orange County
be notified of this action and our intent to pursue m~y efforts to keep
any vmter deposited in the Pacific Occa.n as clean as possible.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be sent
to the Honorable Senators James E. Whctmorc and Dennis Carpenter, the
Honorable Assemblymen Robert E. Badham, John V. Briggs, Robert H. Burke
and Kenneth Cory, end to the follm·.1 ing: the State Water Resources
Control B~ard, the California Regional Wa.ter Quality Control Bocird,.
Santa Ana Region, the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County, the Board
of Supervisors of San Bernardino County, the Board 6f Directors of the
Countv S&Q.ita.~19P. Di~strict.§_ of Oran?-:e County, the Santa Ana Watershed
Planning Agency, and the Southern California Coastal Water Rese.2rch Age.nc~
AYES: SUPERVISORS
NOES: SUPERVISORS
ABSENT: SUPERVISOH.S
Agenda Item #15f
DAVID L. BAYJ~R, WILLIA1'1 J. PHILLIPS, RALPH B.
CLARK, RONALD H. CASPERS, AND R. W. BATTIN
~
NONE
NONE
E-3. All Districts
1
2
"-"' 3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
J> w I-
IL~ 7:
0
15
~~ 16 I -w IL> l:l
lJ. I-z 0 z <(
:::>a: 17 80
18
19
20
21
·22
23
24
25
26
n I
~28
29·
30
31
32
F 103 I· I I
11
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
' SS •.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, W. E. ST JOHN, County Cl~rk and ex-officio Clerk of the
governing Board of the Orange County rlood Control Dlstr.ict, hereby
certify that the ~hove and foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
adopted by the said Board at a rev;Jer meeting thereof h~ld on the 12th
day of Jnnuary, 1971, and passed by a unanimous vote of said Board.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my ha.nd and seal thic
12th day of January$ 1971.
AQenda Item #15f E-h.
W .. E. ST JOclN
County ClE:·rk nn<l .cx--,of fie io Clerk
of the Board of Supervicors of
Orange County, California, acting
also as the govern~ng Board of the
Orange County Flood Control District
. ~. . ·. . . "\ .,. . ' ...
,· .~': :' • "• • • • •' • • • • :: : • ' I•\' • ·. •
t. '"" r, , " ~· .. : ' ~ .
.,, .....
All Districts
RESOLUTION NO. 71-13
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BCARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
·coUi\T'J1Y SANITATION DIS~iRICI'S NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7,. AND 11, OF OHANGE 'COUNTY, CALIFO.RNIA, ESTABLI-
SHING POLICY WITH RESPECT TO PROTECTION OF.
BENEFICIAL USES OF OCEAN ·l·lATER AND REQUESTING THE
.CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD r·o REVI~~·,j EAlSTIHG WA::/i1E iJlSCtlArtv~ REQUJ.R.ti~iVlliN'i1 S
WHEBEAS, these Districts have entered into a· waste·water treat-
ment and disposal agreement with the Riverside CoUi."1ty Flood.Control
and Water Conservation District providing for accepting, treating and
disposing of a maximum of 50 million gallons per day of wastewater
from the Santa Ana River drainage area upstream of Prado Dam, ~·1hich
wastewater, if disposed of in: said upstream drainage area, will cause
a further degradation of the quality of flow of the Santa Ana River
entering Orange County, and
WTtlEREAS, said agreement also is j_n the best interests of Ora·ne;e
County in that it effectively provides that the quality of such
upstream wastewater discharges ·will be put under· the control of the
Sanitation Districts, and
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors have evidenced and implemented
their concern in the preservation of the ·water quality of the Pacific
Ocean in the area of the Districts' wastewater discharge by means of
(a) A continued planned program since 1956 of expansion and upgrading
of wastewater treatment and disposal facilities. Said program has
required the annual expenditure of approximately $4 million for the
past several years and it is planned that a similar level of ~xpendi
tures will continue indefiniteiy (b) ·The construction and equipping
of. a ne·w· and modern labora.tory buj.lding at .a total estimated cost of
$300,000. Said laboratory will be capable of performing all tests
necessary to monitor effluent quality and, by .means of toxicity tests,
to measure its effect, if any, on marine life in the discharge area.
Agenda Item #15f F-1 All Districts
~
This laboratory will be staffed to perform any and all tests deemed
·necessary and it is planned that the scope of such tests and research
will be above and beyond waste discharge requirements established by
·the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (c) A monitoring
program of the quality of marine waters in ·thP. wastewater oischHr~P
area and a comprehensive study of the existing and future marine
life in said area. The scope of said monitoring.program and study
is over and beyc;nd the existing requirew:mts of the Calj_fornia
Regional lvater Quality Control Board ( d) Entering into a joint
powers agreement with other Southern California waste dischargers
to provide an intensive study of the effects of waste discha~ges on
nearshore waters. Said study, now being conducted by the Southern
Calif.ornia Coastal Water Research Project Authority at an expected
total eventual cost of $1, 100, 0.00, is expected to provide valuable
information to guide the Dis~ricts in future pla~1E'· for further
upgrading of the quality of wastewaters discharged to the marine
environment, and
WHEREAS, the disposal of wastewater to the Pacific Ocean by the
Sanitation Districts is under the statutory jurisdiction of the
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region,
which has adopted Resolution No. 59-5 (3-68) regulating the quality
of the wastewater discharged by the D~stricts in order to protect
the benef1cial.ocean uses established by said Regional Board, and
WHEREAS, each Sanitation District has recently adopted a uniform
connection.and use ordinance which provides for regulation of the
quality of wastewater discharged to the Districts' faci_lities_, and
WHEREAS, it is planned that said uniform ordinance will be
further implemented in the near future by adoption of r~~es and
regulations regulating the discharge of toxic materials, and
WHEREAS,, said aforementioned agreer!'lent with the Riverside County
Flood Control and Water Conservation District provides that said
District must meet the same :wastev·rn.ter quality standards as have
Agenda. Item #15f F -2 All Districts
been, or may b~, established for wastewater discharges within the
Sanitation Districts.
NOW, THJ!!REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Boards of Director8 of
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,. 6, 7, and 11, of Orange
County, California, ·as follows:
1. That these Boards of Directors hereby reaffirm their fixed
and continuing policy for taking all necessary measures including,
but not limited to, those enumerated hereinabove, to protect the
quality of marine waters in the Districts' wastewater discharge area
as said quality may be affected by said discharge.
2. Recognizing that the protection of the quality of marine
waters in the Districts' wastewater dischar8e area is a statutory
responsibility of the California Regional v.ra.ter Quality Control
Board, Santa Ana Region, said Board is hereby requested to review and
to revise) if necessary, the Districts existing waste discharge
requirements for the purpose of assisting the Districts in the further
implementation ·or the hereinabove stated policy.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resolution be
furnished to members of the legislative delegation from )range
County, the Orange County Board of Supervisors, the State Water
Resources Control Board, the California Regional Water Quality
Control Board, Santa Ana Region, the Santa Ana ~fatershed Planning
Agency and the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Authority.
Agenda Item #15f F-3 All Districts
CH1'\iWE OH.DEr\
·--~----..__. __ _
G.O. NO. 1
D.ll '.PE:
$_·_:_-:_0 __ -··--
~-In accordance vd th contract 1)1:ovi sions, the follcnJing cl1ane;es in the
ccd-::.:·.rci.ct c:iHJ/or c,')nt:rac~t ·~·1or1: &.:-:-c h.:'rcby rrnthr::-,::··~:-~/:c:1 c:.nd <..:.s. co:::pcnt;::.t::.c:
therefor; the follow:tng add:L tions to or· dcducfions-from the contract price ·
a~e hereby approved .
. IJue to delay in the evalirntion and dissemination of
-information for proposed equipment,. an extension of
contract t.ime is granted in the amount of .. ~ ..... : ......... ·. 8 calendar days
. TOTAL "TIME EXTENSION ........... 8 calen·aar days
_Summary of Contract 'fi_me:
. .
·original Contr~ct Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion D8te
Time Extension This Change Order
Revised Completion Date
November 19, 1970
()3 calendar da:,.i:s
January 21, 1971
8 calendar days
Jamiary 29, 1971
. . .
~oarc1 authorizat:i.on elate:
February 10, 197J_
'JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS
Agenda Item #19
Orlginal Cont-ract Price $ _§_,_ 685-.!-3.5_ ______ _
Prev... _t\ uth .. Changes $ ~----!}212~---------·--·--·--
~fhis Change (ADD) (DEDuc:r) $ ____ !2one· --------·-
Amended Contract Price ~ 6 -' 685. 35 .
'i------·----------
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION .DISTRICTS of
Orang·e Coun.ty,. CaJ5fo:cnia
GENEPul\L EIJECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY
-G-All Districts
·. n . . . . .
~lfi
>~.~· .:.:.l . \, .. <\ PHOENIX •
ARIZONA
..
CAR.O LLD' .. ENS 8 .. 1\l.f;: ER S
L:AFAYEJTE • SANTA ANA
C.'1.LIFORNIA
• EL PASO
TEXAS
J9HN A. CAROLLO, P. E.
.. H. HARVEY HUNT, P. E.
3600 MT. OIABLO SOUL.EVAR_D •
LAFAYETTE, CALIF'. 94549
HOWARD M. WAY. P. E.
ROBERT G. WlLLl~MS, P. E ..
DONALD R. PRf.ISl.ER, P. E.
February 2 1 1971 AREA CODE: (415) 283-3895
Reply to:
P. o. Box p28
Hunti!lgton. B:?,e.Gn
California 92648
~. Fred A. Harfer, General Manager
County Sanitation Districts of Orange' Coun~r
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject: Ocean Outfe.11 No. 2tJ Marir..e Section
Attached you will find a letter from Peter Ki~· ..... it Sons' Company
requesting one(l) day extention of ti.r!:.e for del~y due to hig~::velocity
winds"
·We reco:rrn:end approval of one (1) day extention of tirr.e for
s· January 1970 in accordance with Section 6-3 of the General .Provisions
of the Specifications.
The Contractor has requested a total of seventy-four( 74) da.ys
extention of· tirr..e of which vre h...'1.v~ reco~ended approval of seventy-tvrn(72)
days eztention throu~h JanuaI)~ 25, 19710
Very truiy yours,
JOHN CAROLLO ENG I1~EP.S
,. ,-
. .
;;rUa4~/!y;).;.
Walter Ao Bishop Jr. . :f"'
Resident Engineer
WAB:wb
Enclosu~e
. ·,
A:~enda I tern ~}20 -H-All Districts
' ..
~ .
-~
·~ETER .. KJEVVi_T SQ.NS' CO .. -
CONTRACTORS
£STA13L.ISH ED 1664
MAIN OFFICE: OMAHA 3), NEBR.
!000 K!EWIT TL . .'.Zt
AOORE:SS REPLY TO;
Po O. Box 552
•'
. John Carollo En~ibeera
?.Oo Eox 528
Huntin;!t-On Beach, Ca. 92648
Attni; Mr .. Walter A. Bishop
.· · Hu.ntinzton Beach, Ca. 926Lt>
Januery 8:; 1971
Resident En~ineer·
Re~ Request for extension of tir::c.
Gentlemen:
In accordm cc with t.1.e general provisions of the specifications
Section 6, para:raph 3, we respect.fully reouest a-ri extension: of the
contract time for one (1) day because of weather delays (hie;h winds)
on Tues:lay Januar-.r 5, 1971.
The wi.nds caused the draggin~ of anchors ari.d work on mo sf· of the first
shift and all of the second &"lift uas suspended.
·. Very Tru.ly. Yours,
Pet er Kie-;d t Sons' Co ..
cc: File
(} t:l ~i)'\ _, /~-:C~~c/~ ~
John Ford ur. ./ v Project Supt, [,,/
Ag nda I ~·e,n1 1..1.,-t20 e . . v -I-A~1 Districts
~-CAE=lOLLC:l"
PH9ENIX
ARIZJf.JA
• LAFAYETTE •
JO,HN A. CAROLLO. P. E.
H. HARVEY HUNT, P. E.
HOWARO M. WAY. P. E.
ROBERT G. WILLl~MS, P. E.
DONALD R. PREISLER, P. E.
Fred A. Harper, General Manager
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
P. 0. Box 812?
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CALlfOKi~iA
SANT·A ANA • EL PASO
3690 MT. O:ABLO BOULEVARD
LAFAYETTE, CALIF. 94549
AREA CODE: (415) 283-3895
February 3, 1971
Subject: Interim Pump Station· and Additions to Bypa.ss Facilities
·at Plant No. -1
An. Interira Pump ·station is require;d·to. be OP.erational at the time
the Sunflower Interceptor is operational (now scheduled for early in 1972).
In order ·to have the required connections and pump station operational
by the above elate, final design of the subject project should start
immediately. We would like authorization to proceed with this design at
the Districts 1 ear:!.iest convenience.
We 'propose to accomplish the engineering for this project in
acct.rdance with the terms of ou1· Contract dated July 1, 1970 and set forth
in item M. Based on the scope of work set forth at the January 20-21
Design Conference, we estimate the cost for the engineering to be
$10, 500.
HHH:jk
Agenda Item f/22 -·J-All Districts
RESOLUTION NO. 71-14
APPROVING INTER-·DISTRICT BASIC CONSTRUCTION,
MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT.LNG AG.P.EEMEN'r, RJ:!;:
MAIN-DYER INTERCEPTOR
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 AND 7,
GF Ob.A!{GE COUNT f, CALIFuRHIA, .A.?FR0VI1Ki
AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF BASIC CON-
STRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING AGREE-
MENT RE: MAIN-DYER INTERCEP'I10R; CONTRACT NO. 1-12
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
1 and 7, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain ag1eement. entltled "Ba.slc
Construction, Maintenance and Opera.t.ing Ag1eement, Cou~nty
Sanitation Districts 1 and 7", dated February 10, 19'Tl relative
to construction of the Ma.in-Dyer Interceptor; Contract No. 1-12,
is hereby approved; and,
Section 2. That the Chairmen and Secretary of Districts
Nos. 1 an~ 7 are.hereby authorized and directed to execute said
agre2ment on behalf of the Boards of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting February 10, 1971.
Agenda. Item #26 -K-Districts 1 & 7
RESOLU TION NO . 71-21
AU THOR IZATI ON TO EXECUTE A TE MPO RARY
WO RKIN G LIC ENS.b AG REEMENT wrrH A. J.
GIS LER _, ET Afi""-:
A RESOLUTION. OF THE BOARD OF DIREc°TORS
OF CO UNT Y SA NIT ATIO N DISTRICTS NOS . 1
Al'YD 7 _, J P OR.ANGE COU NT Y_,. CALil"C RN IA ,
APP ROVING AND AUTHO RIZING.EXECUTION OF
A TEMPORARY WORKING LICE NSE AG REEMEN T
WI TH A. J . GISLER , ET AL
* -JE--ll-* -)(--X--Ye -)(-
The Board of Director& bf County Sanitation Dis trict s Nos .
1 and 7, of Orange County , Ca..Lifornia._,
DO ES HEREBY RESOL VE , DETERMINE AND ORDER :
Section J.. That the Ch a irman and the. Secretary of County
Sa.ni ta.ti on District No . 7 be a.u thor:Lz e d and direct .~d to accept
and si gn tha.t c e rtain Temporary Working License Ag reement vd th
A. J . Gis l er _, e t al_, dat ed --------·-----·-·-' descri b e d. on
Exhibit 11 A11 att ached hereto and ma.de a. pa.rt of t hi s resolution ;
Sec tion 2 . That said license be acc epted and a.ppr·oved by
t he Di stri ct up on the f iling of a du ly executed copy t hereof .
in t h e office of the Secretary; and ,
Section 3 . That the Audi t or of the District be aut hor i z ed,
upon r eceipt of a. d em and signe d by C. A. Nis son , General
Counsel of .the District , to pay to A. J . Gisler and Mary A.
Gisler the sum of $1 , 659 . 00 , fo r sa.id Tempo rary Wo rki ng License
Agreement .
PASSED A-ND ADOPTED at a: re gula.r mesting F ebruary 1 0 : 1971.
_A genda. Item #27 -L-
RESOLUTION.NO. 71-~2
AUTHORIZING l\.CC,EPTANCE OF EASEIY1'~NT
A RESOLUTION' OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. l_Af'ID 7,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIF.ORNIA, AUTHORIZING
ACCEPTANCE OF· EASEMENT F~OM A.J. GISLER,
ET AL
* * * * * * * * *·*
The ·Boards 6f Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1 and 7, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated
~~~~~~~~~~-
, wherein A.J. GISLER, ET AL grants to
County Sanitation District No. 7, a perman'ent easement for
sewer purposes situated in the County of Orange, State of
California., in connection with construction of Sunf]..ower
Interceptor, Contra.ct No. 7-6-1, is hereby approved and accepted;
and,
Section 2. That the real property over which said
easement is granted is more particularly described in Exhibits
"A" a.nd "B 1
' attached hereto c.nd made a part of this resolution;
and,
Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is accepted at
a total cost of $14,694.oo, to the District; and,
Section 4. That the. Audi tor of the District, upon receipt
of a demand signed by C. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel of the
District, be authorized to pay the sum of money as set forth
herin for said easement; and,
Section 5. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors
be authorized and directed to recrod said deed in the Official
Records of Orange County, California..
p .ASSED AND .AnOPTED at a regular meeting February 10, 1971.
Agenda Item #28 -M-Districts 1 & 7
~/)) £·. . '!;? . I; i~ffe./,l.A, ~//~.1%1' (Y?<!:#lf/~Y
ENGiN Ei:Rii\lG
0
EN~INEERS o ARCHITECTS
412 SOUTH LYON STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHONE C714> 547-4471
ADDRESS REPLY TO P.O. BOX 178
February 4, 1971
Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No.
of Orange County ·
Post Office Box 81 /.7
Fountain Valley1 CA 92708
Attention Mr. Fred A~ Harper" General Manager
Gentlemen:
In response to Mr. Harper's request, we subm!t our proposal for perf~rmin0
engineering services for the preparation of pl ans and specifications for the
·Main-Dyer ln.terceptor as presented in the Engineer's Report for County
Sanitation District No. 1 by Boyle Engineering, dated November 1969.
The proposed facilHy will begin at Sunflower Avenue and Main Street where
it is to be connected into the Sunflower Interceptor 1 extend northerly along
Main Street to Dyer Road and continue easter! y along Dyer to Hal I a day Street.
The trunk wil I consist of four distir :t reaches (Reaches 25, 26 1 27 and 28)
varying in pipe size from 39 inches down to 15 inches. Total estimated cost
of the proiect including construction 1 engineering; surveying, inspection,
legal,administration and i~cidental costs is $522,000. ·
Construction of the interceptor will provide relief to the district 1s existing
Dyer Road and Santa Ana trunks as well as relieving certain sewers in the city
of Santa Ana which are currently flowing under surcharged conditions. Aisoi'
a city of Santa Ana pumping station in the vicinity of MacArthur Boulevard
and Main Street wil I be deacf.ivated because the new interceptor wil I provide
a gravity connection for the pumping station tributary orea. The interceptor
will serve a small area in District Noo 7 between Main Street and the Newport
Freeway and south of Alton Avenue. Consequently / District No. 7 will have
a 3 percent ownership in Reach 25 which extends from Main and Sunflower to'
Main and MacArthur. The remaining reaches will be owned l 00 percent by
District No. 1.
We wil I perform the fol lowing professional ensineei-irig services for the
Main-Dyer Interceptor:
PROFESSIONAL
a. Hold conferences with representatives o(the district, city
of Santa Ana, County of Orange, property owners or leas·~es
involved., other pub! ic agenci es 2 and others, to review and
discuss all aspects of th~ project. · ·. ·
El'\:GINEERING AND A R C H. I T E C T U R A L SF..RVICES
Agenda. Item #30 N-1 District l
·~
. .
Board. of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 1·
· February 4, 1971 ·
Pc,ge Two
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
i.
i·
.k.
I.
Make arrangements for and coordination of fie! d s~rxeys /
soils investigations, and pavement coring.
Prepare preliminary engineering studies and. design for
review and cpprcval. ·
Prepare engineering data for regulatory permit applica-
tions that may be required by the city of Santa Ana and
th~ Orange County Road Department.
Prepare detail pl ans and specifications •.
Prepare estimates of quantities and co<:ts.
Deliver the origina: tracir.gs of ~e pl aus and reprodiJcibf e ·
plates of the specifications for the district's use in preparing
the necessary number of copies for record purposes, distri-:-·
but ion to prospective bidders I etc r '
Prepare legal descriptions and Flats for right-of-way ·
acquisition as required for foci ity location and construction.
Assist the district or its agent in sequring bids, tabulation
and analysis of bid· results and in I etting of contract.
Check shop and working drawings as may be submitted by
the contractor.
Review I aboratory reports on materials tests and inspections
and correlate such reports with the intentions of the plans
and specifications.·
Furnish consultation and advice to the district or its agent
during construction.
m. Furnish periodic observations. of construction work and
progress and provide appropriate reports to the distri Ct.
n. Prepare record drawings (uas-constrl!cted 11
) when construction
work has been comp I eted and accepted by the district. Th is
shall mean the original tracings of the plans will be modified,
if necessary / because of deviations from the original work.
When inspection is carried out by personnel not directly
employed by the engineer, modifications to the original
tracings will be based upon information supplied to the
engine·cr by t0e district. The original tracings after being
modified will become district property.
BOYLE ENGINEERING
Agenda. Item #30 N-2 . District 1
Board of Directors
County Sanitation District Noo 1·
February 4, 1971 .
Page Three
o. Observe initial operation of the project / witnessing perfor-
mance tests os required by the specifications and reporting
same to the district.
P• Make a fina·f inspection and report of the completed proiect
with a representative of the district or its agent.
We propose to provide the services in items 11 a 11 through npn for.a basic fee
of $23, 100. It is suggested that payment be monthly on a percentage com-
pleted basis up to 90 percent at time of .delivery of plans a~d specifications.
with 100 percent payment when the work is comp! ~ted and accepted by the
district. · . . ·
. There will be field surveys required in order to p.repare the plans a"nd seecifi-
cation5. These surveys wiI! include taking topography and culture witnin the
proi ect I imi ts. We propose that al I' field surveys .necessary for design be per-
formed on a per diem basis at our current per di~m rates, a copy of·Which is
enC:osed.
If any revisions are required by major changes in the scope of the project
after the preliminary drawings are approved or after the final plans are
completed, and such revisions are ordered by the district, we wil I perform
StJch additional work at the current per diem rate.
Vie propose that all outside services that are required and approved by the
d!!;trict such as soils investigations, pavement coring, and plant inspection
for quality control for materials used on project construction will be paid
directly by the district upon presentation of a statement of such outside
services with the engineer's certification.
All additional engineering work and services such as constru.ction staking
and construction inspection wil I be compensated at the per diem rates in
effect at ac~ual time of work. Payment to be monthly as invoiced.
If we are authorized to proceed with this work at the February 10th board
meeting 1 pl ans and specifications can be ready for the board's approve! at
the July 1971 board meeting.
Respect~ully submitted,
BOYLE ENGINEERING
/) v 1" v-,/71,_ ,.;.~ii ~1-dt:.j._/f~ ,e /•N..J_d,;
Conrod Hohener / Jr., C. • 10951
Principal Engineer
pm
Enc
BOYLE ENGINEERING
Agenda. Item #JO N-3 District 1
,.
.~
''-""
B 0 Y I. E E I'-! G I N F F. P. i N G
RATE SCHEDULE
MAIN-DYER INTERCEPTOR·~ CONTRACT f'-10. 1·~12
Cl assifi co Hon
ENGINEERil"-JG
Principol Engineer
Senior Engineer
Assoc i af·e Engi n ecr
hsisi·cmt Engineer
DRAFTl 1-..JG
Senior Draftsnwn
Draftsman
SURVEYlt~G
Licer)sed Surveyor
3-Man Survey Porty
2-Man Survey Party
CONSTRUCTIOl"-l IN.SPECTION
Resident Engineer
lnspecf·or
MISCELLANEOUS
.. Clerical
Travel -. Auto
Travel •· Other than auto
Telephone
Printing and blueprinting
Sub feet· to revision January 1, 1972
BOYLE ENGINEEHING
.b.8_'9nd a. I t_~n1 ;/~3Q N-L~
$29. 00 cm hour
25.50 an hour
22.50 an hour
19. 00 an hour
$16~ 00 an hour·
13.50 an .~.our
$19.50 an hour
48. 00 an hour
37 o 50 an hour
$19.50 an hour
·12.00 an hour
$ 8. 00 an hour
0.15 a mile
Actual cost
Actucil cost
Cost+ 25%
Di.strict 1
RESOLUTION. NO. 71-19-1
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF QUI~rCLAIM
DEED
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTR1CT NO. 1,
OF. ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA~ AUTHORIZING
EX.ECUTlON OP QUrrcLAIM DEED
*"*-******
The Boa.rd of Directors of County Sanitation ·District No. 1,
of Orange County, Ca ifornia,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Quitclaim Deed for portions
of existing District easement, dated , from
County _Sani ta.tion District No. 1, to A~ tT. G ISLEH_, be a.pp roved;
a:nd,
Section 2. That the real property to be quitclaimed is
more particularly shown on Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B 11 attached
hereto and made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman of the District be author,ized
and directed to execute said Quitclaim Deed, quitclaiming the
Distr.ict' s interest in the certain real property here:i..nabove
described upon receipt by the District of Grant of Easement
from A. J. GISLER, relative to construction in County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1 and 7, Sunflower Interceptor Sewer, Contra.ct No.
7~6-1.
PASSED J\ND ADOPTED at a regular meeting Feb-ruary 10, 197·1.
Agend_a~ Item #31 -0-District 1
.~
RESOLUTION NO. 71-20-1
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM A.J. GISLER
*******-K~
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1,
of Orange County~ California
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement,
dated , wherein A. J. GISLER
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
grant to County Sani tB.tion District No. 1, a permanent easement
for sewer purposes through certain real property si.tua.tedin
the County of Orange, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the real property over which said
easement is granted is more particularly described on Exhibit "A"
and "B" attached hereto and made a. pa.rt of this resolution; a.nd,
Section 3. That said Grant of Ease.me11t is accep ced a.t
no cost to the District; and,
Section 4. That tne Secretary of the Boa.rd of Directors
be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement
in the Official Records of Orange County, California..
PASSED AND ADOPTED a.t a regular meeting February 10, 1971.
Agenda. Item #32 -P-· District 1
'\
·.....-
RESOLUTION NO. 71-15~5
APPROVING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE
DISTRICT (ANN~X~rION NO. 4)
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DI~EC.TORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5·, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, OR.DERING ANNEXATION OF
TKrtRI'TORY TO THE DISTRICT 11 PhOPOSED
ANNEXATION NO. 4 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
NO. 5" . .
-l<-****-X·-l<-*
The Board of Directors of County Sa.nlta.tion District No. 5,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That application has heretofore been ma.de to
the Local Agency Forma.tj_on Cornmi s sion for a:nnexa.tj_on of tei-:-:rj_ tory
to County Sani.tation Dj_strict No. 5, by mea.ns 0f a. petition
filed with said Commission by The Irvine Company, sole owner of
the property; and,
Section 2o That the designation assigned by said Commission·
to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Proposed Annexation
No. 4 to C~mnty Sanitation Di_strict No. 5") the exterior boundaries
of which are described on Exriibit "A" and shown on Exhibit 11 B"
attached hereto and by reference ma.de a part of this resolution;
and,
Section 3. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is
uninhabited; and,
Section 4. That the reason for ·annexing said territory is
for installation of a sewera.g.e syste~ in said territory; and,
Section 5. That annexation fees in the amount of $582.80
($310.00 per acre) have been postponed f6r two years during
which an equivalent area. will be withdrawn ·from the District
·"-""' by The Irvine Company; and,
Section 60 That, as authorized by ·resolution of the Local
Agency Forma.tj_on Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District
Agenda. Item #36 Q-1 District 5
't
Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of 'the Goverrunent
ciode, Section 56261, the terr~tory hereiribefore referred to and
·describe~ h'ereinabove, be and :it is hereby ordered annexed to
~ County.Sanitation District No. 5.
PASSED A...l\TD ADOPTED at a regular meeting February 10; 197l.
Agenda. Item #36 Q-2 ·District 5
.I
COUN 1l1Y S:\~H'l'lVI1lO?f DISI1HIC'l1 S OF OHAlrGE COUN'I'Y
P. O. BOX 51'?5 ·-l08L~h Ellis Avenue
'Fountain V£lJley > C~liforrdQ 92'/08
CHAHGE ORDEH
Amou.rit of this chane;e o~"der (.!\DD) ·(DEDUCT)·. $ -.o------
In accotdance with contract provisions, the following chan3es in the
contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price
are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Contractor.ts letters dated· l~ December 7~, 4 January 71 nnd
14 January 71.
The contractor is hereby granted a time extension
due to inclement weather during the following·
time periods:
SUMMARY:·
28 November 70 through 11 December 70... 11+ days
13 December 70 through 24 December TO ... 12 days
11 Janua1jT 71 thr•ough lj January ( l. . . . . 3 days
TOTAL ...... 29 days
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension from C.0.#1
~1·rnp EXtPns~on ~~nm C 0 ~3 •-...... ~ -.· -... - - -... .i.. -..,,,,/ ~ 1-. • 8 I/
Revised Completion Dat~
/
28 May 70
210 days
24 December 70
33 calendar days
29 co.lsnda:i."' days
25 February 71
=--~-----·-=---======::::~
Original Contract Price
Prev.. Au th. Changes C. 0 .#1 . Add
This Change (ADD)(DEDUCT)
Amended Contract Price
=:=;.;.::::::;;::;::::=-==========: ___ _
Board authorization date: Approved:
___ ., _______ _
$ 330 1 000. Q_O __
$_ 4,Q88. 46
I
$ -0-
February 10, 1971 COUNTY SANITATION .DISTRICTS of
Orange County> C~lifornia ·
BOYLE ENGINEERING
Agenda. Item #50 -R~-
By ____ . /s/ Paul G ·-~~'or,·m_:_ ______ ··-· _.
Chief Enr;ineei'
M.ERCO CONSrrRUCTION ENGINEERS
D.istrict 3
COUN 1i'Y S!\N~C'l'NJ.1ION DISrrl\IC~L1S OF OR1\tTGE COUNTY
P. 0. BOX 51'(5 ·· 108l1.i!-Ellis Avenue
Fountain V0..lJey; Cc~lifor!11n 92'{08
CHANGg ORD.!~R
--~---~~---··-C. 0. NO • __ ._......2....._ ___ _
Amount of thj_s change order (ADD) (DEDUcrr) $ -·0---
In accordance w:i.th cortract provis:i.ons) the fol lo·oing changes j 1.'1 the
· contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation
therefor) the following additio11s to or deductions from the contract price
are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Contr·actor: s letter dated 22 J'anuary '(l and
Englneer's Diary.
The contractor is hereby granted an extension of time for
the period which t~City of Long Beach Gas Department was
working in the intersection of Westminster & Bolsa Chica.
This work was done to facilitate the placing of the force
main.through this intersection.
7 Decembe::c 70 L.hrou.gh 16 December ... (0". • • • • • • • • 10 days
The conl.ractor is hereby granted an extension of time due
to inclement weather during the following time periods:
. 28 "November 70 through 6" December 70.... . . . . . 9 days
17 December. 'lO through 24 December 70.:...... 8 days
21· January 71 through 13 January 70. . . . . . . . . .. 3 days
· Total time for weather ..... 20 days
Total time extension ....... 30 days
SUMMARY:
.Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Revised Completion Date
25 June 70
210 ~alendar days
20 January 71
19 February.71
Original Contract Price $ 388 2 449 !2..Q_
Prev. Auth. Changes $ none
. This Change (ADD)(DEDUCT) $ ·none
Amended Contract Price t._388' 449_~g9_
-.. ·--=·-===== ======-=-;;::;;-===-·-;;.;::=-=;:;o,;;;"-.:;::::-'=---·--
9oard authorization date:
~
Fe?ruary 10, 1971
BOYLE ENGINEERIHG
Agenda. Item #51 -S-
Approyed:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
.Orange County) California
By ___ . /s/ Paul G. Bro~·m
By ---
District 3
COUI'f11 Y S1\IH'TA 1rIOi'I DISjrn1crrs Oli' ORAHGS COUi\TY
P. O. BOX 5175 -10844 ElliG Avenue
Fountain \![lllcy > Cc-i .. liforr!:!.a 92'('08
CHi\NW~ ORDER ---·--------C. 0. NO. ------------
I
CON 11'Rl\C'I10H : __ .JS: .. ~--~-·--·Q . .t __ comp2..nY -DNCE: Febru8r.x_l.Q_, __ 19.IJ __ _
Westside Interceptor Facilitico, . .
J"OB: _1/~_s tm.1.ns ter ·Avenue ..I.n..ter9ep..t_g_:r: __ S§.)i~ . .I:, Con_tra_c_LNQ-L-~( Revis~d_)__ __
Amount of this change order (IDm) (DEDUCT) $ 564. 00
In acco-rcl.Gnce ,.d.th contract provlsions, the followin~ ch:.ngc:s i~ t:1e
contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation
therefor, the following additions to or deductions fiom the contract price
are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Instruction from the Midway City. Sanitary·District to
Contractor 8 December 70. Midway C:j_ty Sanitary District
letter to the District dated 28 Janu~ry 71.
DEDUCT
'I'he contractor was instructed by representatives of the
Midway City San:t tary Distr·ict to eliminate tl).e 1~8 11 man-
hole called for in the plans and specification and
described in Item 12 of this contract.
DEDUCT
TOTAL DEDUCT
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Chan~es
This Change ()d;nD)(DEDUCT)
Amended Contract Price
~-------·----
Approved:
56lL 00
564.oo
$_751_~'ll_O. 00_
$ ____ _:_Q:_ __ _
I
$ 564. 00
$ _ _].§.2, ,.ro6. oo
3oard authorization date: ~
· February 10, 1971
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRIC~C1S of
Orange County, California ·
BOYLE ENGINEERING
Agenda. Item #52
By __ ~-/~/ Paul_G.
K. E. C. COMPANY
Brm·m
Chief -------Engineer
District 3
~
COUN'rY s1urrri\TIO~f DIS'l'HIC'l1 S OF 0&'1.I·IGF~ COUi'l'l'Y
P. 0. BOX 5175 -l0844·Ellis Avenue
Fou~tain Valley, Cnlifo~ni~ 92708
CHANGE ORDER ----.
C. 0. NO. 4 . __ ......._ ____ _
CON 1l1RACTOH :~._R .. __ c__~_C_omplillY-------~----.. -·-c-~-D/\'l1 E :_Februa-.rL.d-{L_ 1971
Westsids IRterceptor FRcilitiei,
j"OB: Westmj__n.ster_·Avenu_e · InterQ.~Qfil>r SewerJ Contract 3-14 .CB~:b_se_d_-....._) _____ _
Amount of this change o.rder (:>1_Ilil) ·(DEDUCT)·. · $ 31, 274. 50
In accordA.ncc "t·1 ith cont:r;:;ct provlsions) ·the :follo\·lir:g chengcs in ti1c
contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation
·therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price
are hereby approved.
ADD
Item
No. Unit --
7 V.F.
8 V.F.
DEDUCrr
l L.F.
3 L.F.
15 Each
16 Each
ADJUSTrliENri' OP ENGINE.ER 1 S 0UAN'J~Ir:UES ·------·---~-------
Change
From
.58
26
3432
615
3·
5
Est'd. Quant.
To
63 5 @$180./v.F.
28 2 @$200./v.F.
Total Add
..
3L~31 1 @t124.50/L.F.
-0-. 615 @~50./L.F.
-0-3 @tl50./Ea. -o-5 @ 250./Ea.
'i"'Otal Deduct
·Totai Change Order Deduct
Original Contract Price
Prev .. Auth .. Changes-Dedu9tt C.O.tt3
This Change (X~~)(DEDUCT)
Amended Contract Price
$ 900.00
400.00 ----,.--.. ...
$ 1)300.00_
$ 124.50
30,750.00
450.00
1,250.00
'.
$ 32,574.50
$ 31, 271+. 50
$_790 ,:?70_. 00 -
$ 564.oo
$ 31, 27 L~. 50
$_ 758_,431.50
Beard authorization date: ~ Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California · FebrJary 10, i971
BOYLE ENGINEERING K. E. C. COf.1PANY
Agenda. Item #53 -U-District 3
·,
· RESOLUTION NO. 71-16-3
h_g_CEPTING cowrRACT NO. 3-1L1. AS "COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT
NO. 3-14 AS COMPLETE .
-1(--1(--1(-* -1(-* . -x-
The Boa.rd of Directors of County Sanita.t~on District No. 3,
of Orange County, Ca,lifornia.,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMII\TE AND ORDER:
Section 1. Tha.t the contractor, K. E. C. Comp_any, has
completed the construction in accordance with the tenns of the
contra.ct for the Westside Interceptor Fa.cilj_ties, Westmj_nster
Avenue J::ntc:rceptor Sewer, Contra.ct i'~o. 3-14, on the 28th da.y·
of January, 1971; and,
Section 2. That by letter, District's engineers have
recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed
in accordance with the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. Tha.t the Ch5.ef Engineer of the District ha.s
concurred·in said engineers' recommendation, which said recom-
mendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That the Westside Interceptor Facilities,
Westipinster Avenue Interceptor Sewer, is hereb~ accepted as
completed in-accordance with the terms of the contract therefor,
dated the 15th da .. y of July, 1970; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby
authorized and directed to execute a. Notice of Completion
therefor.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting February 10, 1971.
././-4 Agenda. Item rr5 -V-District 3
RESOLUTION NO. 71-17-3
APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR ONE, 10 11
VERT~CAL SEWAGE PUMP, CONTRACT NO. 3-12-A
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUN'TY SANITATION DISTRiCT1 iW. 3, OP ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SP.ECIFICATIONS
FOR ONE, 10 11 VERTICAL SEWAGE PUMP, CONTRACT
NO. 3-12-A
**-***-X-7<·*
The Board of Directors of County Sanitatiori District No. 3,
of Orange County, California
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed specifications this day
submi tt"ed to the Boa.rd of Directors by Districts' Engineers,
for ONE, 10 11 VERTICAL SEWAGE PUMP, CONTRACT NO. 3-12-A, are
hereby approved and adopted; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed
to advertise· for bids for said ec1"'--1ipment pursuant to the
provisions of the Health and Safety.Code of tne State of
California.; and,
Section 3. That the Secretary of the Boa.rd and the
District's Engineers be authorized to open said bids m behalf
of the Board of Directors; and,
Section 4. That said bids will be received until 11;00 a.m.
February 26, 1971, at which time said bids will be publicly
opened a'nd re.ad; and,
Section 5. That the General :nanager be a.uthorized to
issue a purchase order to lowest responsible .bidder:-for an
amount not to exceed $3,200, plus tax and fr8ight.
PASSED AND ADOPTED a.t a. regular meeting held February
10, 197L
Agenda. Item #57 -W-District 3
·JOHN W. BRYANT
. CHIEF ENGINEER
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
\!'/ATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
20 January 1971
Board of Directors
County Sanitation Districts
.of Orange County
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
1S9!S MARKl:T STr:tF.T
P.O. FlOX 1033
TELEPHONE (714) 78.7-2015 •
Gentlemen: Re: Extensio~ of time for
"Financing By Riverside
District 11
-Nonreclaimable
. Waste Project
Due to.local circumstances beyond control of this District,
the 1 December 1970 deadline for project funding authoriza-
tion under our agreements with your Sanitation Districts
could not be met. It is hereby respectfully requested that you
grant an extension of time to 15 May 1971 for us to obtain
project. financing authorization.
~hank you for considering this matter and the excellent
cooperation of your Board and staff throughout the formulation
of this basin-wide project.
d It ::1:_,·,l..61 Ap;en a_ . · er:i --
-.
Very truly yours,
_,/-) ~ _j /('/ <~ /' 0~ .. ~--i-:--v( C-, . 't :/ '
JOHN W. BRYANT
Chief Engineer
-X--District 2
RESOLUTION NO. 71-18_-2
APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENT rro WASTE
WATER INTERCEPTOR CAPACITY·AGREEMENT
WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUN'rY SANITATION DI3TRICT NO. 2, OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
SECOND Al.~ENDMENT TO WASTE WATER INTERCEPTOR
CAPACITY AGREEMENT WITH RIVERSIDE
COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CON-
SERVATION DISTRICT
*~-*-~***
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETER.J.VIINE AND ORDER:
S~ction 1. That the certain Second Amendment to Waste
Water Interceptor Capacity Agreement with Riverside County
Flood Control and Water Conservation District, providing an
extension of time to May 15, 1971, for nFinancing by Riverside
District", is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman a.nd the Sec:retary of the·
District be authorized and directed to execute said a'M.endment
on behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting February 10, 1971.
k\§enda. Item =//:61 -Y-. District 2
RESOLUTION NO. '(1-19-2 ·
FEDERAL AND STATE G.RANTS -SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR .
(From Treatm~nt .t'lant No. 1 to Katella. Avenue)
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY·
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION
AND FILING OP DOCUMENTS tmCESSARY FOH FEDBRAL
GRANT UNDER 33 use, 466 ET SEQ AND STATE GRANT
UNDER CLEAN WATER BOND LAW·OF 1970
*****·>E-7<-*
The Board of Directors of County Ganita.tion Distrie;t No. 2,
of Orange County, California.
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT:
Section 1. An a.ct of Congress known a.s the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as ~mended (33 USC,· 466 et seq.) provides
for Federal grants for con0truct.ion of sewage treatment works.
Section 2. The State Clean Water Bond Law of 1970 authorizes
the State Water Resources Control Boa.rd to enter into contracts
with public agencies for State grants for construction of sewage
treatment works in the amount of twenty-five percent (25%) of the··
estimated ~ligible total pro~ect cost.
Section 3. County Sanitation District ~o. 2, of Orange
County, is a separate and. distinct agency organized under Chapter
3, Pa.rt 3, Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of
California., for the purpose of constructing, operating and
maintaining a. major trun~ sewer system for the collection of
sewage from the cities and other locai collection se~ering
agencies.
Section 4. The Board of Directors has heretofore entered
into an agreement with the Riverside ~ouhty Flood Control and
Water Conservation District, whereby the two said Districts will
...._,. share in the cost of the construction of cer·ta.in joint interceptor
facilities as said facilities and cost shares a.re .set forth in
said agreement. Sa.id a.greement also provides tha.t this District
-will construct and operate said facilities and thereby. is
deemed to be the "Central Agency'' for 2.a.id g.rant applications as
Agenda. Item #63 Z-1 District 2
set forth in Title 23 of the Ca~ifornia Administrative Code.
Section 5. By means of Resolution· No. of the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Co'nservation District
and this resolution, authorization is· granted for the filing
of applications for grants l-~nder said !\.ct of Cong1·ess a.w1 said
Clean Water Bond Law of 1970 for the construction of the Santa
Ana River Interceptor ~Ln the reach between Treatment Plant
No. 1 of the County Sanitation Districts, of Ora..rige County, and
Kat ell a Avenue.
Section 6. The General Manager is hereby authorized to
prepare, sign and submit, for County Sanitation District No. 2,
a.11 documents necessary to apply for and accept construction
grants under said Act of Contress and said Clean. Water Bond Law
of 1970 for a joint project generally described as:
SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEprl'O}(
(From Treatment Plant No. 1 to.Katella Avenue)
~da. Item #63 Z-2 District 2
SIDNEY L. LOWRY
PRESIDENT
LOWRY ~ND ASSOCJATES
CIVIL ENGINEERS
ASSOCIATES
121 EAST. WASHINGTON AVENUE
BANTA ANA, CAL.IFORNIA g2,701 HARRY C. BILLINGS, VICE PRES.
Telephone
541-5301
Area Code 714
January 25, 1971
Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 2
of Orange County, California ·
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention:
Subject:
Gentlemen:
Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager
Proposal for Engineering Services -
Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer
DONALD J. MARTINSON. VICE PRES.
In accordance with Mr. Harper's request, we are pleased to submit
this proposal for funishing engineering .services for the preparation of
plans and specifications for the Santa Ana River Intercep~or Sewer from
Plant 1 to Katella.Avenue.
· This project has been under study for several years and is fully
described in the June 1969 report entitled, "Feasibility Report for
Joint Outfall Sewer Project with Riverside County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District." The project is an important element in
the District's Master Plan of trunk sewers because it will intercept
and divert flows away from the District's existing Newhope Placentia
Trunk, which is rapidly reaching its design capacity.
Sufficient ~apacity will be provided in the project for the District
in accordance with the sewage flows calculated in our ~aster Plan studies
for the projected land use conditions beyond the year 2000. In addition,
a capacity of 50 mgd will be provided for Riverside County in accordance
with the outstanding agreements~
The project as planned consists of approxirnateJy 32,200 feet of 84-
inch and 14,500 feet of 72-inch diameter sewe~, extending £rom Plant 1
to Katella Avenue where it will intercept the existing Olive Sub-Tr~nk
sewer.
11r4 Agenda. Item ffO AA-1 District 2
.·
January 25, 1971
Board of Directors
County Sanitation ·District No. 2
of Orange County, California
Page --2-
:
The total estimated cost of the project is $8,100,000. Riverside
County's share of this portion of the project ~s approximately $3,000,000.
Their participation is dependent upon their ability to follow through with
a successful bond issue or some other means of financing by May 15, 1971.
The Plans and Specifications ~nd other documents will be prepared in a
manner to meet the requirements of the State Water Resources c~ntrol Beare
and the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration for possible State
and Federal grants that may amount to 80 percent of the proj~ct cost (ex-
clusive of any right of way costs).
. .. ·.·
We will perform the following professional engineering services for
the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer in accordance with the following:
(1) Hold conferences with District's staff, other interested agencies,
and private property owners who may be involved in the project.
(2) Assist in the preparation of the documents and repor~s for federal
arid state grants.
(3) Make arrangements for and coordination of field surveys, soils in-
vestigations, and related work.
(4) Prepare preliminary design studies for review and approval •
. (5) Assist in obtaining permits from the Orange County Flood Control
District, the California State Division of Highways, and other
affected agencies.
(6) Prepare construction plans and specifications.
(7) Prepare estimates of quantities and cost estimates.
(8) Deliver the original plans and specifications to the District for
reproduction by the District.
(9) Prepare legal descriptions and maps for right of way acquisition as
required.
(10) Work with appraiser and attorney in right 'of way matters.
A£J:enda. Item #64 PtA-2 District 2
..-
""-"
January 25, 1971
Board of ~irectors
County Sanitation District No. 2
of Orange County, California
Page -3-
(11) Assist the District in securing and tabulating bids, analyzing bid
results, and awarding contract.
(12) Check shop and working drawings as may be submitted by the con-
tractor.
(13) Furnish consultation and advice to the District during construction.
(14) Make a final inspection and prepare a report on the completed pro-
ject. ..
.
(15) Prepare "As built" drawings of the completed work and file the
original drawings with the District.
Our firm has already accomplished some of the above work in the pre-
liminary design phase as authorized by the Board on July 8, 1970. This
wo~k has been paid for on a monthly basis and is to be credited against
the engineering fee for the project.
It is planned to divide this unit of the Santa Ana River Inter-
ceptor Sewer into three contracts. We propose to provide the services
in Items 1 through 15 for each of the contracts as followsi
Contract Estimated
Cost
2-14-1
Plant 1 to $2,600,000
Edinger Ave.
2-14-2
Edinger Ave. to 2,300,000
17th Street
2-14-3
17th St. to 3,200,000
Katella Ave.
Totals 8,100,000
Engineering
Fee
$ 92,850
80,380 .
110,190
283,420
Less
Previous
Billing
$ 7,300
7,300
7,300
21,900
(As of
Net
Fee
$ 85,550
73,080
102,890
261,520
•. Jan 15, 1971) ~ .
J0enda. Item #64 AA-3 District 2
•• l ..
January 25, 1971
Boar<l of Directors
County Sanitation.District No. 2
of Orange County, California
Page -4-
We propose that all outside services as approved by· the District such
as title work, soils investigations, pavement coring, plant inspection for
quality control of materials, and other related work will be paid directly
by the District with the engineer's certification. ·
In r~gard to fjeld surveying, any additional work needed for pla~ fr~
paration and construction staking, we propose to accomplish at the follow-
ing rates:
Three man survey party---$44.00 per hour
Two man survey party---$37.00 per hour.
In. the event the District requires daily inspection services, we pro-
pose to provide this service upon written request by the District, at an
hourly rate of $10.00.
We s~ggest that payment for engineering services be made monthly
based on the percentage of the work completed, up to 90 percent at the
tine of delivery of the plans anJ. specifications, and 100 percent payment
·when the project is completed and accepted by the District. Payment for
surveying and inspection services to be monthly as invoiced.
Mr. Martinson will be assigned as Project Manager for the project
and.a sufficient number of qualified ·engineering personnel will be working
on the project to have the specifications for the three contracts ready by
May 10, 1971. and the.plans for the three contracts ready by May 15, 1971.
DJM/jh
Agenda. Item #6L~
Very truly yours,
Lowry and Associates
Sidney L.~ Lowry . ~~
AA-4
·---ii-~ ..
District 2
SIDNEY L. LOWRY
PRESIDENT
·.·
LO\:'VRY AND ASSOCIATl'::S·
CIVIL. ENGINEERS
ASSOCIATES
121 EAST. WASHINGTON AVENUE
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA g2701 HARRY C. BILLINGS. VICE PRES.
Telephone
541-5301
Area Code 714
February 2, 1971
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fou~tain Valley, California
Attention: Mr. Paul Brown,
Chief Engineer
Dear Mr. Brown:
DONALD J. MARTINSON. VICE PRES.
We have reviewed the responses from the soils engineering firms
that were requested to submit proposals fo~ a soil investigation re-
port for tµe proposed Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer Project from
Ellis Avenue to Katella Avenue .
. In our opinion all of the firms are qualified to do t~1e work.
However, Geolabs-California, Inc. has been working with us by offering
consultation and advice durin5 the preliminary design stag~ of the
project. It is therefore recommended that a proposal be requested
from that firm with the understanding that the cost.shall not exceed
$15,000.
DJM/jh
.A-genda Item f,!·65
Very truly yours,
Lowry and Associates
-~,ef/ p~zl:2,,:~4---.
Donald J. Martinsor-
BB-1 District 2
I .
f G'E O'LP, B-S-~"'CA LTF~O'RN i'A :, '1 ~C~_-·~,~Q~~~~~g~oEG~y~fN~~c·· ..
..,..,.,..,.... ~ • ... ;. '"-~ · .. ,. -:~~ -o:. ,.. _ ,,__._:_. -·--~---• ....;;·:~ -·-"...,....;,, __ • ...,.. ,. ___ ,_--~..._ ... .::__:,,. .,:: .. ,,. . .;_~.~~ ....... -·~ .... 1 ~.;;..,,::.»0 ;.;.:,,,. :,;.....:_..-••• 1 .... -~;;.__.;,......._ ~-:r• •. ,>:. • .._,;o.!' .• ' •. , .• .,. ... •-·-~;·,~ .. ~,..,..,,~-· .... -a.£--.·---....,..•..:~··---.. ~.....,...,.: .. · .. ·-~ . .:._ ....
2168 South Hathaway St. e P.O. Box 2426 .. Santa Ana, California 92707 • (714) 546~6602
February 1, 1971
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P. 0 ; Box 81 27
Fountain Valley, California 92780
. .
Attention: Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manuger
Subject: Request for Proposal -Soil Investigation Santa f.na
River Interceptor Sewer, Ellis Avenue to Kate Ila·
Avenue, Orange County, California
Gentlemen:
In accordance with your letter request dated January 2·1, 1971, we would
like to express our interest in investigating the soils conditions pertinent
to the subject project. After advice and discussions with Mr. Don Martinson
of Lowry Engineering-Science, we have inadvertently stated an oral esti-
mate of a maximum fee for the approximate scope of work outlined. We
realize that certain problems have developed with regard to submitting a
proposal, since there has been a wquest for proposals from several other
soils engineering firms. The ethical considerations of pr·ofessional societies
to which we belong precludes competitive bidding. These consi9erations
have been developed to promote the best interests of the client, and not
to provide financial benefit to the engineer. ·
Under present circumstances we cannot submit a competitive bid; however,
for purpo$es of es ti mating the prol:x:t bl e costs of the required soi I e ng i nee ring
services,· we have found the fees charged in comparable past projects has
ranged from 100 to 500 dollars per boring. The variance in fee is largely
the result of required drilling spacing and deRths, necessary somplir.g,
laboratory testing, and complexity of the foundation materials and engi-
neering struct:.Jre for which the investigation is conducted.
. .
After considerable evaluation we find that the code of ethics of the
American Society of Civil Engineers precludes our submission of a proposal
which may be interpreted as competitive bidding for professional services.
\.
OFFICES: VAN NUYS. CALIFORNIA• SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA• LAS VEGAS, NEVADA • 8ELLEVt;i::, WASHINCTOl'I • TACOMA, WASH_INGTON • HONOLULU, HAWA!l
Agenda. Item #65 BB-2 District 2
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County February 1, 1971
poge two
The Geofabs-California, Inc. organization of Santa Ana, California is staffed
with 22 personnel including 5 registered engineers and 2 engineering ge.ologists.
If we· rr.ay further negotb~e for the· subject projact, ·in accvrdance with ASCE
Manual 45, 11 A Guide for The Engagement of Engineering Services", we will
be pleased to provide a detailed proposal for performing the required scope of
services.
Should you have any further questions regarding this letter or our availability
please do not hesitate to contact me at our ~onto ~na offices (546-6602).
Very truly yours,
~BS-CALIFORNIA, ~NC.
Gerald~~~
Chief Engineering Geologist
GAN/wp
cc: Lowry Engineering-Science
Q
GE OLAES. INC.
Agenda. Item #65 BB-3 District 2
MOORE & TAB'ER CONSULTING ENGIN.EERS AND GEOLOGISTS
4530 EAST LA P~LMA AVENUE • ANAHEIM, CALIF"ORNIA 92806 • (714) 524-3350
OTHCR 0,.F'ICCS:
WOOOLANO HILLS
WEST SACRAMENTO
SANTA ROSA
Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California· 92708
SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER
January 28, 1971
Your letter of January 21 requesting our proposal for a soil inves-
tigation of the subject project is acknowledged. We would like to
work with you on this project and co~ld provide the cost information
you desire if our finn is selected to do the work. Our qualifications
have recently been presented in connection with the Inter-Plant
Influent Interceptor.
A submission of tost figures at this time would not conform with the
ethical practices of the Ameri:an Society of Civil Engineers. If you
would like to discuss our qualifications in more detail or a founda-
tion investigation program for this project, please contact us.
We appreciate your interest in our firm.
vc
cc Lowry and Associates
Attention Mr. Don J. Martinson
Sincerely,
MOORE & TABER
1· \~
. .._{:--:-,--1_1 _/{. _, -·' • -·.'._· ---l--~ --
R. F. Moore
President
Agenda. Item #65 BB-4 District 2
MAI!" OFFICE IG315°M EAST EDINGER STREET, SANTA ANA,CALiFORNIA 92705 • (714) 543·3411
1138 WILSHIRE BLVD.,
0
LOS ANGELES 90017 • 213 • 481·3990 540 EASTTHOMPSON BLVD., VENTURA·, CALIFORNIA 93001
94°901 FARRIN
0
GTON HIGHWAY, WAIPAH,U, HAWAII 96797
MAURSETH • HOWE·· lOC~WOOD & ASS.OCIATES
RAYO. MAURSETH, C.E.
JOHN B. HOWE, C.E.
ROBERT D. COUSINEAU
CHARLES S. HOWE JR., C.E.
R. BRUCE LOCKWOOD, OEOL .. P.E,
<;::ounty Sanitation Districts of
Orange County, (:alifornia·
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
A CORPORATION
Con.suiting Foundation Engineers and Geologist.s
Santa Ana, California
JaJ?.uary 2 7, 1971
Attention: Mr. Fred A. Harper, Gene.ral Manager
( 005) 643-3438
(808) 871-337
Subject: Request for Proposal -Soil Investigation Santa' Ana .~iver Inter-
ceptor Sewer, Ellis Avenu.e to Katella Avenue
Gentlemen:
We wish to acknowledge your letter of January 21, 1971 with attached
investigation specifications and plans, requesting a soils investigation for
the above trunk sewer project. Your letter requested that we furnish cost
information for performing this investigation.
From your letter and recent conversations with Lowry and Associates,
we understand that you have requested priced proposals from other consult-
ing engineers. Since it is contrary to the code of ethics for professional
engineering firms to knowingly furnish competitive bids for engineering ser -
vices, we must decline to submit a proposal stating costs for this project.
Your attention is invited .to Manual 45, uA Guide for the Engagement of
Engineering Servicesn which describes a recommended procec:Iure in the ne-
gotiation of engineering contracts. For purposes of de.termining the probable
cost of these engineering services, reference may be made to the fees charged
in comparable pa.st work such as· the (1) Interplant Influent Interceptor Line,
and {2) several Los Angeles County Flood Control District Bond Issue Storm
.Drain Projects, engaged in by this offi_c.e~~
<F:~"'
If our organization is selected to proceed with further negotiations as
described or referenced above and have so informed the other firms, we
BRANCH OFFICE MANAGERS
ALBERT BACA • SANTA ANA
RICHARD P. COUSINEAU, GEOL. •VENTURA
RICHARD A. MARTIN, P.E. -HONOLULU
Agenda. Item #65
STAFF ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS
ARA MELKONIAN. RICHARD £-WEI.HU
WILLIAM R. MUNSON, JR .• RAY EASTMAN
KENNETH H. KOFORD. DOUGLAS C. SHUMWAY
BB-5
CONSULTANTS
K. BERT HIRASHIMA,P.E. ·HAWAII·
AWTAR SINGH. PH.O .. C.E.
District 2
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County -2
would be pleased to provide a price proposal.for perfor.ming the soils in-
vestigation outlined.
Should you have any further questions regarding this letter or our avail-
ability, please do not hesitate to contact us.
JBH/jk
cc: Lowry and Associates
Agenda. Item /J65 BB-6
Very truly yours,
MAURSETH-HOWE -LOCKWOOD
& ASSOCIATES
Howe, V.ic e. President
9905
District 2
. ~ . -· ~ . . ..
CONSULTING FOUNDATION. ENGINEERS tz:::;T I 711 NORTH ALVARADO STREET 0 LOS ~NG.ELES, CALIFORNIA 90026 0 TELEPHONE 386·3920
LEROY CRANDALL
AND ASSOCIATES January 26, 1971
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention: Mr. Fred A. Harper
Genera I Manager
Gentlemen: ·
Request for Proposal -Soil Investigation
Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer
Ellis Avenue to Katella Avenue
Orange County, California
This is in response to your letter of January, 21 requesting our proposal for
investigating the soil conditions in connection with the subject project. While we
would be pleased to work with you on this project, we understand that you have
made similar requests of other soils engineering firms in the area. In view of this,
we must decline to submit a proposal on a price basis.
The services requested are professional and should be con.tracted for on a
negotiated basis. We firmly believe that competitive bidding for professional ser-·
vices is unethical, and we are sure that other reputable soi Is engineering firms in
this area are of the same conviction. These ethical considerations have been formu-
lated by professional societies to which we belong and were developed to promote
the best interest of the Client, rather than to secure a financial position for the En-
gineer. In fact, the professional societies to which we belong feel so strongly on
the matter t~at a member who violates the practice is subject to expulsion.
We would, of course, .be interested in performing the soils engineering work
for the project, but must refrain from propo~ing in any manner that would constitute
competitive bidding·. If you wish to consider our firm, we will be pleased .to d.iscuss
our services ond the cost thereof on .a professio!lal basis.
LC-FB/ex
(2 copies submi ttcd)
L. LeROY CRANDALL, C. E.
FREDRICK A. BARNES
LEOPOLD HIRSCHFELDT
Agenda. Item #65
Yours very truly,
LeROY CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES
·~~ ,? J byc__~;\~~cu ~ ...
. LeRoy Cranda~ t~
RUSSELL C. WEBER. C. E. SEYMOUR S. CHIU, C. E. ROBERT CHIERUZZI. C:
J. D. KIRKGARD. C. E. P. A. MALJIAN, C. E. JAM~S L. VAN 'BEVEREN. C. E. •
JAMES M. McWEE. C. E.
BB·-7 District 2
t·•.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
January 22, 1971
REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ON
SUPERVISORY AND MANAGEMENT OVERTIME AND COMPENSATION
Subcommittee Members: Ed Just (Chairman)
Ellis N. Porter
Wade Herrin
Morton Baum
Pursuant to the request of the Executive Committee, the
Special Subcommittee on Supervisory and Management Overtime
and Compensation has met on several occasions to review the
cu~rent·regulations in this regard. The following are the
recommendations of this subcommittee~
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Delete excess time provisions of the regula-
tions for supervisory personnel
Provide, at Districts' expense,"life insurance
one and one-half times the base salary (to a
$50,000 maximwn) for all supervisory personnel
(A) Investigate the possibility of a
larger percentage at the employee's
expense
Provide an Endowment policy in the amount of
$5,000 for five years, for department heads
and management personnel only, at employee's
option. Districts to pay half; employee to pay half.
Add a provision to permit employees to defer a
portion of their income until retirement or
separation from Districts. Deferred portion to
be placed in a reserve accotmt and the amount
to be def erred is to be determined annually by
the employee
COMPENSATORY TIME RECAP
ADMINISTRATIVE AND SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES
The following represents a contingent liability of $40~455.00.*
POSITION TITLE
General Manager
Ass't. General Manager-
Chief Engineer
Directo.r of Finance
Maintenance Superintendent
. Director of Operations
and Laboratories
Deputy Chief Engineer
Office Engineer
Plant Maintenance Supervisor
Collection Facilities Supv.
Mechanical Supervisor
Electrical Supervisor
Chief Operator
Laboratory Supervisor and
Research Associate
Engineer Associate
Assistant Rnginecr
Accountant
Chief of Industrial and
Perm~i_ t Di vision
~-Amount based on year earned
EMPLOYMENT
DATE
1959
1958
1959
1962
1956
1961
1964
195r(
195h
1960
1963
1961
1970
..
ACCRUED
COMPENSATORY
TIME (11/1/70)
541.5
575.75
623
894
8l~o. 5
302
290.5
241
16
166
6
23
12
'(l~
246.5
5
.. ,
CURRENT OVERTiiliE AND COMPENSATORY TIME PROVISIONS
,
The following sections have been excerpted from the current salary
and conditions of employment resolutions.· These provisions have
essentially been in effe~t since· October, 1963. .
The carry-over range referenced in Section No. 19 has be2n.adjusted
periodically to mainta~n its level relative to the supervisory classi-
fications.
RESOLUTION No. 70-2
.section·19. No supervisory employee who occupies a position
th~t pas a salary range exceeding that of range No. 48.5, as
hereinabove established, shall be compensated under the provisions
of Sections 16, 17, and 18, of this resolution, except as provided
.·
in Section 5 of Resolution 70-3. (See notes un page 2) •.
. RESOLUTION No. 70-3
Section 5-_. Any employee sepa,!at:i.ng from the District~'
servicie who has performed overtime ·service and which overtime
~~ service has not been compensated for as provided in ·the Districts'
most current Positjons and Salaries resolution, shall be entitled
i
I ; ..
!
I
( to full pay at his regular rate at tim~ of separation for such over-
time service.· Any such overtime pe,y shall be ·separate1y j_temized
and paid in a lump sum on the payroll following sepaTatlon. When
separation is caused by the death of an employee; payment shall be
made to the estate of such employee, or in applicable cases, as
provided by Section 630. of the Probate Code. Nothing in this
··section she,11 ~e interpreted as prevcntj_ne the General M~no.ge:r from
.f:tlling a pof.:i_ ti on vacated by separation j_mmecUe,tcly folloi.·dnz, the
last day ac tuf1,l1y worked by the scpara.ted employee.
Sect.Jon 6. .Management and supcrvlsory personnel \·rho occup~,r
"-"" posit:tons ~·1h:i.c:h ha.vc a se,le.1·y or r.e.lm.'Y. ranr:c exceeding tha.t ~.ct
forth in Scc.ti0n 19 of the D1stricts' rnof,t ctnTent Posit:i.on;. a.nd
SalarJ0s rcsolvt:i.on, shall not be e:omp0nc-.at~:c1 for overtiH:c af~
P rovided in Se:ction 16 the1--eof. FJotrpver t't-G 1 M 1 1 ~· .. , i.Le enera_ anager s 1a1 __
cause a record to be kept of the accumulated overtime service of
such empJ°.oyecs and may grant cquj_va.lent time off with ful1 po.y at
any t_ime dui"lng employment to such employe0f~ upon a.ppJlcation.
NOTES: -
Section 16 of Resolution No. 70-2 provides for maximum paymen_t
of 2L~ hours overtime per month for non-supervisory personnel.
Section 17 of Resolution No. 70-2 provides for shift dif-
ferential payment for non-supervisory Operations Department personnel.
Section 18 of Resolution No. 70-2.provides for weekly standby
pay for non-supervisory Maintenance personnel.
~
December 22, 1970
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
MEMORANDUM TO: Special Committee for Surveying Compensatory
Time Provisions for Supervisory Personnel
ATTENTION: Chairman Edward Just
SUBJECT: Life Insurance for Supervisory Personnel
I
In accordance with your request concerning the cost of
various life insurance programs for supervisory personnel not
eligible for overtime, we have received the following preliminary
information from our group ins~rance carrier:
Life Insuranc~ at 1-1/2 Times Annual Salary 2 Maximum $502000
Estimated Annual Cost
Life Insurance at 2 Times Annual Sala~2
Estimated Annual Cost
Life Insurance i.n the following groups:
Manager and Assistant Manager
Department Heads
Supervisors
Estimated Annual Cost
$ 3,200
Maximum $502000
$ 25,000
20,000
15,000
$ l~, 200
$ 2,300
Deferred Compensation Plan_ (~1anagement and D~Jmrtment __ Ij_eads Only)
During the past year, the Executive Committee has discussed
a deferred .compensation plan for key employees. The enclosed letter
from Connect:i.cut General· Life Insurance Cc)mpa.ny outlj ncs such a plan
an~ indicate~ the annual cost.
./·
/~~ 'f~-.::~~~-.;
Rkhard A. Strassel, CL.U.
District Ma nag er
Orange County Gro'up Office
November 11, 1970
Mr .• Wayne Sylvester
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
108!~4 Ellis Avenue
Post Office Box 5175
Fountain Valiey, California
Dear Wayne:
Re: Deferred Compensation for Key Employees
863 South Main Street, Suite 205
Orange, California 92668
Telephons 538-1121
Early this year we considered in great detail the ra.'11ifications of
installing a Deferred Compensation Program for certain key employees.
This letter is to review, as briefJ.y as possible, the best way to
handle such a program.
The objectives of your plan will be to provide:
1. A benefit of $5,000/year, in addition to retirement benefits,
starting at age 60 and payable for five (5) years.
2. 'l'o provide the widow of the employee a $5 '· 000/year· income for
five (5) years following the death of the employee.
3. 'I'o assure that these benefits are not interrupted due to the
employee's inability to work due to extended disability.
Such· a plan would assist you in retaining key employe.es in the face of
competition for their services from both private industry and other
governmental agencies, as well as rewarding them for long service to the
Districts.
"-""
Mr. ~!ayne Sylvester
Page 2
November 11: 1970
The individuals to be covered would be:
Fred Harper
Wayne Sylvester
Will·iam Clarke
Ted Dunn
Paul Brown
Age 47
Age 33
Age 42
Age 38
Age 58
There are a couple of ways that this can be done. The easiest way is
. ·to purchase Endowment Policies. These will provide the necessary cash
at age 60 or de~th, whichever occurs first. The Waiver of Premium
provision will assure that the plan will be self-completing in the
event that the employee becomes disabled, at no further cost to the
Districts.
In Paul Brown's case, Endowment at age 60.would not. be available (and
would be prohibitively expensive if it was available.) In Paul's case.
the best bet would be a ten year endowment. This would allow Paul the
full benefit at age 68. If he retires prior to that date, you would
provide a reduced benefit accoI'.ding to the following schedule:
Lump Sum Payment or Annual Income for 5 Years ·
After 2 Years $ 3' 175
3 Years 5,450
4 Years 7,825
5 Years 10,325
6 Years 12,925.
7 Years 15,675
8 Years 18,575
9 Years 21,675
Waiver of Premilm1 would not-app1y in his case.
The cost of this prograrn would be:
It1red Harper
.Wayne Sylvester
William Clarke
Ted Dunn
Paul Rrown
Total
$1,895.25
750.50
1,2119.00
977.25
2 ,551 . .2.Q
$7,423.50
. $ 673
.1 '155
1,658
2, 188
2,739
3,323
3,937
4 ,59lk
We discussed the possjbility of using this program in lieu of the Group
Life Program for these individua1s. Frankly, I don't recommend this
procedure. Group Ljfc Insurance shou1.d be in addition to these benefits.
<..
· .Mr. Wayne Sylvester
Page 3
November 11, 1970
It should be noted that the insurance to fund the Deferred Compensation
Agreement is subject to satisfactory evidence of insurability. Evidence
is not required in tne Group plan. .
It would be possible to allow the Group plan to provide the death benefit
prior to retirement and fund the "living benefit'' through annuity con-
tracts. Using the same retirement benefit as· above, the cost would be:
Fred Harper
Wayne Sylvester
William Clarke
Ted Dunn
Paul Brown (for 10 years)
Total
1··
$1,653.00
625.00
1 ,081 .00
826.00
2,291.00
$6,476.00
This type of approach would not b~ self-completing in the event of dis-
ability, except for the death benefit. If a death occurred, however,
·the funds for that individual would revert to the· Districts.
Wayne, in my opinion, the first approach is the better one, mainly because
it is "cleaner" and provides additional death benefit. These are pretty
representative costs--there really is very little actual dollar difference
between approaches. Your decision basically is
1 • Do we want such a plan; and
2. Are we willing to set aside approximately $7,500 to do it.
I will be happy to meet vrith you and your committee to pursue the idea in
depth if you desire.
Sincerely,
0J)-~) ·A11 \ v/v~
Richard A. Strassel, C •. L. U.
RAS/leh
WIL1'IA!vi P. FICKER, A.I.A.
Architecture and Planning
. Suite 875 • 550 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, California 92660 • Area Code 714 • 644-1581
January 19, 1971
. Mr. Fred Harper
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
Post Office Box 5175 .
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Reference: Adm i n i s t r a t i o n - E n g i n e e ri n g B u i 1 d i .n g
Dear Fred:
The attached are schematic plans for your review and comment.
I would appreciate having you and the staff study this
submittal and then arrange a meeting where we can discuss
your comments.
Sketches of earlier plans have been shown to Wayne Sylvester,
Ray Lewis and John Sigler. Their comments have been shown on
these plans. However, I anticipate further questions and
study before the final layout is obtained. Along with these
early discussions there are several conditions which need
consideration and discussion before proceeding. These are:
a. Elevator: The elevator is required to service the second
floor for use by handicapped persons. This could be
completely installed now or prepared for, now, and
furnished later. This was not covered by the original
budget.
b. Conference Room: Enlarging of the conference room by
approximately 8 feet seems feasible and we feel could.
be within this budget .. The co~t will probably be
$3,500.00 to $4,000.00. I wouid like confirmation if
this is necessary.
c. Vault Door: It has been recommended that this door
be relocated to the wall adjoining the reproduction
room. The added cost of this is hard·to determine,
but I would like to consider the netessity of this
move.
. .
Mr. Fred Harper·
Co~nty·sanitation Districts
of Orange County
January 19, 1971
Page Two
Except for the above the final layout is a matter of study
and coordination with you and the staff. The cooperation
we have receive~ has been very good and the replies to our
questions expedient.
At present we are a few days behind schedule, but feel this
time can be made-up during the next phase. Your immediate
attention to the enclosed plans would be appreciated.
·If there are any questions regarding th·e plans, please
contact me or Jim Green and we will be glad to discuss
them. After you have reviewed the plans we can arrange
a meeting to discuss· your comments.
Respectfully,
WILLIAM P. FICKER, A.I.A .
( . ( --.._ --,.. ~ (
~' . ---~-1/ . ______ ... -i , . .-'('
~1T . ...._ . -~-au 1 Y:··_i"R1f f~rig, A. I. A. ;_
Project Architect -r--
PJ R: j b
Enclosure
WI.LLIAM P. FICKE.R, A.I.A.
Architecture and Planning
Suite 875 • 550 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach; California 92660 • Area Code 714 • 644-1581
January 19, 1971
Mr. Fred Harper
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
Post Office Box 5175
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Reference: Vehicle Maintenance Building
Dear Fred:
Attached please find the schematic phase submittal for
your review and approval. As soon as you and your staff
have had a chance to review the drawings we would like to
discuss th~m with you and get your approval to proceed
w1th the next phase.
The schematic drawings SD-1 and SD-2 show the design
solution to the building and site. The scope of work is
an outline description of the building and material as
intanded at this phase. Some slight variations in the
plans or scope may occur as final plans are prepared.
At this stage we would also like to review the budget.
The designed building of 14,400 square feet at the budget
of $120,000.00 is approximately $8.34 per square foot.
This is a minimal budget. We are going to strive to keep
this budget but we all shoulp anticipate that the bids
may b~ higher due to the scope of the project and the
·budget. The original master planned building was assumed
to be approximately 10,000 square feet housing 40 vehicles
and equipme~t pieces.
Work that is assumed to be not a part of the contract is:
Removal of existing trees and vegetation.
Asphalt paving and striping.
Fencing and gates.
landscaping.
Soil investigation and testing.
Vehicle repair and maintenance equipment~
Mr. ·Fred Harper
J·a n u a r y 19 , 19 7 1
Page two
In light of the above information,. I recommend that
we be authorized to obtain a construction estimate from
Halvorsen and Dingman as part of the next design phase.
This will give an accurate cost to antiGipate during
bidding. The cost of the estimate·would be approximately
$400.00 to $500.00 ..
If the~e is any question regarding the plan~ or scope
please call me. We feel that we can meet the scheduled
date of May 1, 1971, for completion of drawings.
Approval of this schematic phase is requested by
January 26, 1971.
Respectfully,
WILLIAM P. FICKER, A.I.A.
r--· --...... ,
'" \ \ : I /' V~.J"\~; ;...
Paul J. Ruffing~ ~.I.A.
Project Architect
PJR:etm
Enclosure
COUNTY SANITATION·DI:STRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE BUitDING
SCOPE OF WORK
1. AREA: 14,400 square feet
Maintenance - 8 service stalls.
Storage -36 vehicles, 14 equipment.
Office, Toilet, Lunch Room and Locker Room
Exterior -73 storage spaces.
Semi-truck service pit.
2. BUILDING:
Floors -Reinforced concrete slab.
Walls -Reinforced concrete tilt-up interior partition
wood stud and drywall.
Roof -Steel girder, wood purlin and panelized wood
framing. ·
Built-up composition roofing.
Doors -Metal overhead roll-back (manual operation).
Finish -Paint interior and exterior.
Lighting -Suspended fluorescent.
Heating -Office and Lunch Room -heating, ventilating
and air conditioning.
Maintenance -heating and ventilating only.
3. EXTERIOR:
Paving -Asphalt concrete (33,800 square feet)
Fencing - 8 feet high (brick or concrete).
Sliding gates at driveways.
Lighting -Security pole mounted quartz fixtures.
PJR:jb
1/19/71
~·
POST OFFICE BOX DI
. I R v I N E I c A L I F 0 R N I A 9 2· 6 6 4
..
Mr. Fred A. Harper
General Manager
January iz, 1971
Orange County Sanitation District ·
P •.. 0 • Bo~ 812 7
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Mr. William Hurst, the new General Manager of the Irvine Ranch
Water District; and the undersigned would.very much appreciate
your arranging an opportunity for us to meet with your Board
of Directors, or an appropriate committee of your Board, to
··discuss the possibility of establishing some rr"iutually bene-
ficial joint us·e o_f the Joint Sanitation Districts'. ocean
· disposal facilities.
Duririg the past seve~al months, the Irvine Ranch· Water Dist~ict
has made some major strides towa~d the establishment of clear-
cut goals with respect to its Water Management Progrant. The
specific actions necessary to achieve these goal$ havE also
become· much clearer and better derined tha.n they were when
this District previously discussed cooperative possibilities
with your agency.
It may be of interest for your Board ~embers to know that the
type of inter-agency cooperation which we wish to discuss with
them does not involve any attempt at this late date to purchase
capacity in the Sunflower Trurik Sewer. The approach we have in
mind would also eliminate any need for the inland area of the
Irvine Ranch to construct outfall capacity at Crystal Cove.
In addition, our "Total Water Management Concept" places major
emphasis on the reclamation and re-use of waste waters, while
at;: the same time recognizing the need for a limited amount of
_.... .. . ,
..;··
Mr. Fred A. Harper
January 12, 1971
Page 2
ocean disposal capacity as a fail-s~fe fe~ture.· W~ believe these
·obj~ctives would meet. with the approval of your Directors and
that they may be willing to assist us in implementing such a pro-
gram,
Mr. H_urst and I both look hopefully forward to the pleasure of
personally meeting and talki.ng with your Boc;3.rd members or their
designated representatives.
Very truly_yours,
IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT
.~/L~kr~
Ray L. Stoyer
Director of Planning
RLS:db
MEMORANDUM
January 27, 1971
TO: Lindsley Parsons, Chairman of District No. 5
FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Deputy Chief Engineer
SUBJECT: Feasibility of Household Flow Reduction Methods to
Reduce Sewage Flows
The Engineering Department has had the opportunity to review the
United States Department of the Interior publication, "A Study
of Flow Reduction and Treatment of ·waste Water from Households".
This Federal Water Quality Administration sponsored report incor-
porates not only flow reduction methods which might be applica.ble
to the areas served by the Districts but also details household
treatment and disposal methods which we ~o not feel are feasible
at this time to incorporate in Orange County.
Of particular interest was a presentation of the modification or
substitution of existing plumbing fixtures which could result in
an average per capita reduction in the vrn ter· consumpticn and sev1age
discharge of frqm 14 to 24 gallons per day. Those particular plumb-
ing fixtures which lend themselves to modification or· substitution
and also acceptance by the user are as follows:
1. Limiting flow :valve for shower }).eads.
2. Limiting flow valve for lavatory.
3. Limiting flow valve for kitchen sink.
4. Batch-type flush valves in dual cycle.
5. Shallow trap water closet.
6. Dual cycle water closet.(British pioneered system).
If we consider that these flow reduction plumbing devices were incor-
porated to serve the increasing population from today to the year
2000 this would affect approximately 1.2 million people which could
result in an overall sewage reduction of from 17 to 29 million gal-
lons per day of the projected flows for the year 2000. This flow
reduction would also result in a 2.9 million dollars to 3.8 million
dollars savings in capital cost outlays for primary treatment and
disposal facilities based on today's construction cost and a 250
thousand dollar to 350 thousand dollar annual treatment and rlisposal
cost not considering post-chlorination of the effluent.
H. CONSENT CALENDAR:
NOTICE TO PUBLIC
All matters listed under CONSENT CALENDAR are
considered by the Council to be routine and will all
be enacted by one motion in the form liste~ below.
There will be no separate discussion of the·se items
prior to the time the .Coun c il votes on the motion
unless members of the Council,· st~ff, or the public
request specific items to be discussed and/ or
removed from the Consent Calendar for separate
action.·
Members of the publ~c who wish i:o d.iscuss a Consent
Calendar item should come forward to the lectern upon
invitation by the Mayor, state their name, address and
Consent Calendar item number.
1. COMMUNICATIONS -For filing:
(a) Copy of letter from Don Adkinson to Mr. John Willoughby, Chair.man
Citizens Cor.:i.mitte e, City of Anaheim regarding Sa.::.1ta Ana Riv er
Study and enclosing copy of "Comments of part ·Of the Citizens
Committee Repr e senting the City of Newport Beach as part of
the Advisory Group for the Study of the. Sant a Ana River £ron1. the
Prado Dam to the Sea." {Attached for Council )
(b) Copy of letter from Joseph H. Donohue to the Governor and all
Legislators suggesting a change in the method for financing local
fire departments. (Attached for Coun_cil )
(c) 1970 Orange County Granl Jury reports on planning, communications
and Orange County Sheriff's office. (Attached for Council)
(d) Notice of Prehearing Conference before Public Utilities Commission
in connection with application of Southern California Edison Company
for increase in rates.
(e) Notices from Local Agency Formation Commission. of hearings on
December 23, 1970 iii connection with the following:
(1) Proposed annexation to the Co~tu. 1vfesa Sanitary Dist:i.'"ict
designated Engin_eer' s No. 132, located at the easterly end
of the triangle formed by San Diego Freew ay and Greenvflle
Banning Channel. · ·
(2) Proposed annexation to the Costa Mesa Sanitary District
designated Engineer 1 s No. 134, located northerly of Baker
Street and easterly of Harbor Boule v ard in the CHy of
Costa lvf.e sa.
-9-
(f) Preliminary Agenda for Local Agency Formation Commission
meeting of Decembel". 23 indicating among matters to be considered
the proposed annexatio:i:i to County Sanitation District No. 5, Annexation
No. 4.
(g) Copy of agenda of Board of Supervisors meetings held December 15
and 16, 1 9 7 0.
·(h) Copy of minutes of Orange County Mosquito Abatement . District
mee'ting held November 19, 1970.
2. COMMUNICATIONS -For referral:
(a) To staff for reply, letter from Tom Shelton protesting destruction
of the Fun Zone in Balboa. (Attached for Council)
(b) To staff for reply, letter from Mrs. Ernest Ballif requesting stricter
enforcement of the leash law and animal nuisances l _aw.
3. RESOLUTIONS -For adoption:
(a) Resolution No. authorizing the execution of an indemnity
ag:Ceement between the City of Newport Beach a:p.d The Irvine
Company in connection with Tract 6927 storm drain system,
along Bayside Drive at El Paseo Drive. _(Report from Public
Works Director attached)
(b) Resolution No . requesting the County of Orange to include
within the arterial highway financing program the development
of Ball;>oa Boulevard. (Report from Public Works Director
· attached)
(c) Resolution N~. requesting the County of Orange to include
within the arterial highway financing program the development of
University Drive (North). (Report from. Public Works Directo:::-
attached)
(d) Resolution No. awarding a contract for Balboa Parking Lot
improvements, Contract No. 1260, to Astec/ Loughran in the
amount of $249, 656 . 90. (Report from Public Works Pi.rector
attached)
(e) Re .solution No. · authoriz_ing the execution of a parking
agreement between the City of Newport Beach, The Irvine
-10-
EXCEHPT~-) FROM THE MINurrES OF T-HE HEGULAR
J.OJNT MEETII~C; OF 'I'HE BOARDS OF1 DIRECTOHS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 an~ 11,
OF OF.At-!GE COUNTY, Cl\LIFORNii'.
A regular .j oin-C meeting of the Boar.Js of .'Di.rec t:n~s '.)f County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6J 7J and 11, of Orange
County, California, was held at the hour .of 7:30 p.m.,
February 10 . . , 19 71 , 1081+1+ Ellis. Avenue, Fountain
VaUey;, CaJ.jfornia.
The Chairman of the Joint A'iministrative Organization called
the mee~ing to ~rder at 7:30 p.m.
The roll was called ar,~1 the Secretary rcpoi-te.::i a quorum.
present for each Di8 tric t' s Bc)a1·rl.
* * * * * * * * *
DISTRICT 7
AdJ_':',:l rnme n t
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Boa.rd
of Directors of County Sani ta.tion District No. 'l, be
e.~journed to February 23, 197J_, a.t 5:00 p.m. The ChA.1rm:=m
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:43 p.m.,
Feb :ruary 10, 1971.
STATE OF CALIFORNIAl
SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE
I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the
Boar~s of Directors ~f County Sanitation Distri2ts Nos.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
•1 0 hereby certify that the above and fcregoing to be full,
true anc~ c::>rrect ce>py of minute entries on meeting of
sai0 Boar~s of Directors on the 10th d~y of February
i9 --r1 '
IN WIT!-!ESS \ .. :HEREOF, I have hereunto set my han·l this 11~•th
Februa.yr .-lay of
Nos.
1, 2, 3,
EXCERPTS FROM rJ.·Hk 1.-i!NU'l'ES OF 'I'HE REGULAR
JOINT MEETING OF THE BOArtDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2~ 3, 5, 6, 7 ani 11,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular joint meeting ~f the Boarjs of birect~rs 8f County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, ?, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange
County, California, was held at the hour .of 7:30 p.m.,
Februa.ry 10 ., 19 71 , 10844 Ellis· Avenue, Fo~ntain
V~lleyJ California.
The Chairman of the Joint A1ministrative Organization called
the me e t i. r: g to ::>rd e r a t 7 : 3 0 p . m •
The roll was 12alled anrl the Secretary rep~rte-1 a ouorum.
present for each District's Boar~.
* * * * * * * * *
DISTRIC'J.1 1
Ad ti ournmen t
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, be
adjourned to February 23, 1971, at 5:00 p.m. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned &.G 9:42 p.ru.,
February 10, 1971.
STATE OF CALIFORNIAl
SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE
I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the
Boar~s of DiTectors ~f County Sanitation Distri~ts Nos.
1, 2, 5, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
-1 0 hereby certify that the above and foregoing t::> be full~
true an~ correct copy of minute entries on meeting of
sai1 Boards of Directors on the 10th day of Fehruary
19 71 . '
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hawl this
. ...:i ay of
1, 2'
S-187
Nos.
EXCERPrrs FHOM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAH
:1 OINT MEETING OF THF. BOARDS OF DIHEC'TORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 ani 11,
OF ORAI>JGE COUNTY, CALI FORNI/'.
A regular joint meeting of the BoarJs of Direct~rs 8f County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, an~ 11, of Orange
County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m.,
February 10 , 1971 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain
Valley, California. ·
The Chairman of the Joint kiministrattve Organization called
the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
The roll was ~alled anrl the Secretary reporte~ a ouorum
present for each Dj_strict's Boarn.
* * * * * * * * *
DISTHICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adc.iournment
That this meetj_ng of the Boa,rd
of Directors of C0unty Sanitation Dj_strict No. 2, be
a.dj ourncd to Fcbr-iar,y 2'~, 1971 at 5: 30 p. m.. The Chs.inrw.11
then declared the meeting so adjounred at 9:49· p.m.,
F'eb1·uary 10, 1971.
STATE.OF CALIFORNIAl SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE ~
I, J. WAY.NE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the
Boarris of Directors :Jf County Sanitation Dtstri::ts Nos.
1, 2,.3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
-1 0 hereby certify that the above an '.'.:1 foregoing t:> be full,
true anc~ correct copy of minute entiries on meeting 9f
sai~ Boards ·or Directors on the 10th day of February
19 71 . '
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my b&nrl this
.-lay of
S-187