Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971-02-10COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX Bl 27. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) February 5, 1971 TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910. 962-2411 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OP COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 fillID 11 Gentlemen: Th.e next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Dlstricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, a.nd 11, of Orange County, California, will be held: Wednesday evening, February 10, 1971 at 7:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Ten ta.ti ve a.djournments prior to next regular meeting: Executive Commit.tee: F'ebrua.ry 23_, 19'"(1, 5:30 p.m. Districts Nos. 1 and 7: February 23, 1971, 5:00 p.m. II MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS P. 0. Box 5175 10844 Ell is Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Teleph ones: Aree Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 February 5, 1971 REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, February 10, 1971 7:30 p.m. The following is a brief explanation of the more important non- routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are not a ttached to the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but wi ll appear in the complete agenda availa~le at the meeting. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Joint Boards Nos. 14 and 15 -REPORT OF EXECUTIVE AND BUILDING COMMITTEES AND ACTIONS ON COMMITTEES' RECOMMENDATIONS: The Committees met during the evening of January 28, with Director Stevenson as a guest . A report of the meeting , together with the recommendations to the Joint Boards is enclosed with this mailing. Agenda Item No. 15 (a through f) is consideration of the recommendations set forth in the Committees' report. No. 17 -QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT: Our independent auditors, Hanson, Peterson, Cowles and Sylvester, Certified Public Accountants, have advised that they are mailing to the Directors, under separate cover, their required report for the period e nding September 30, 1970. The staff wi ll be prepared to answer any questions the Directors may have on the material in the report. No. 18 -MID-YEAR BUDGET REVIEW: Mr. Sylvester will present a report on our operating and capital outlay expenditures during the first half o f the fiscal year compared with budget amounts and expenditures in the corresponding period of 1969-70. Mat e rial on this sub ject is being forwarded under s eparate cover. No. 19 -CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, TO PLANT JOB NO. J-4-A: Owing to a delay in the approval of drawings , etc., the staff is recommending that an extensjon of time of 8 days be granted on this contract for the purc h a se of a 750 KVA dtstrihut.i on service traus f'o rme r for Plant No. 2. No. 20 -EXTENSION OF TIME FOR OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 (JOB NO. J-10): It is our policy to ask the contractor on this job to apply for extensions of time as delays occur. He has requested, and the engineers have approved, an extension of one day for January 5, 1971, because of high winds. The action appearing under this item is accordingly recommended. No. 21 -ATTENDANCE AT MEETING OF ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN SEWERING AGENCIES (AMSA): This organization, whose activities have been previously reported on verbal ly, is scheduling a meeting in Washington, D.C., during March. The Directors are aware of the value of participating in these meetings, particularly with respect to the Association's activities relating to construction grants and Federal regulations on construction and operation of treatment works . It is recommended that one staff member be authorized to attend the March meeting. No. 22 -PROPOSAL FOR DESIGN OF NEW PUMP STATION AND ADDITIONS TO BYPASS FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. l, JOB NO. I-7-3: Included in the agenda material is a proposal, dated February 3, from our Plant design engineers for engineering services in connection with the above facilities. As stated in the letter, it is necessary to pro- ceed with design immediately in order that the facilities may be operational by the time flows from the Sunflower Interceptor facilities reach the Plant. We recommend acceptance of the proposal on a per diem basis for a total fee not to exceed $10,500. Districts Nos. 1 and 7 No. 26 -INTERDISTRICT AGREEMENT REGARDING MAIN-DYER INTERCEPTOR: The next regularly scheduled construction project, approved under the 1969 Engineer's Reports, is the Main-Dyer Interceptor. This facility will connect with the new Sunflower Interceptor at South Main Street and run northerly to Dyer and thence easterly to Halladay Street. Although District No . 7 will have only a very small interest in the new sewer (approximately 1%), it will be necessary to enter into an agreement providing for joint construction and use of the interceptor. The proposed agreement appearing in the agenda material is very similar to that adopted last year for the new Sunflower Interceptor. Nos. 27 and 28 -ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY FOR SUNFLOWER INTER- CEPTOR, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-1: The General Counsel advises that he has reached agreement with the property owners for acquisition of permanent and temporary easement for the above facility through undeveloped property at the lower end of the project. He recommends the action indicated on the agenda under this item. District No. 1 No. 30 -ENGINEERING PROPOSAL FOR MAIN-DYER INTERCEPTOR: I have asked the District 1 s engineers, Boyle Engineering, to submit a proposa l for the necessary engineering services in connection with the project described under Item No . 26. A lump sum design fee of -2- $23,100 has been negotiated and it is recommended that the proposal be accepted on this basis. Nos. 31 and 32 -EXCHANGE OF DEEDS REGARDING RIGHT OF WAY I N CONNECTION WITH EASEMENT FOR SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACT NO. 7-6-1: In connection with the settlement recommended by the General Counsel for acquisition of new right of way, as described under Item No. 28, the General Counsel is recommending that the District quitclaim an existing fee ownership in return for an easement on the same parcel. No. 35 -ADJOURNMENT TO 5:00 P.M. FEBRUARY 23: Bids for a large Plant job (Sedimentation Basin "K 1' and Digester "K" at Plant No. 2, Jo b No. P2-17) will be opened on February 17 and it is recommended that the Board adjourn, for the purpose of awarding a contract, to a concurrent meeting with District No. ?, which immediately precedes the next Executive Committee meeting. District No. 5 No. 36 -FINAL APPROVAL OF ANNEXATION NO. 4: The Directors will rec.all that the Board recently gave preliminary approval to this small (1.88 acres) annexation in the Harbor View Hills a rea. The resolution appearing in the agenda material finalizes Board act ion on this matter. District No. 7 No. 45 -ADJOURNMENT TO 5:00 P .M., FEBRUARY 23: Bids for the first unit of the Sunflower Interceptor (from Treatment Pl ant No. 1 to Be ar Street, Contract No. 7-6-1) will be opened on Februar y 17 and it is r ecommended that the Board a djourn, for the purpose of awa rding a contract, to a concurrent meeting with Distric t No. 1, which immediately precedes the Executive Committee meeting. Over 60 sets of plans and specifications have been taken out fo r this job, which is an all-time record. We a r e therefore hopeful of receiving favorable bids. District No. 3 Nos. 50 a nd 51 -EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR CONTRACTS NOS. 3-12 AND 3-13 : The se two recommended change orde rs grant extensions of time of 29 and 30 days, respectively, for these two contracts, which are a portion of the Westside Interceptor Facilities, now nearing completion. The time extensions a re detailed on the change orders appearing in the agenda mate ria l. Nos . 52 through 54 -COMPLETION OF CONTRACT NO . 3-14: The K.E .C. Company, contractor f or the Westminste r Avenue Interceptor Sewer, satisfactoril y completed his work on January 28 and the c los eout of the contract, by means of these three agenda items, is recommended. It em No. 52 authorizes a deduction of $564 as explained on the change order and Item No. 53 is the customary change order providing for adjustment. of contract price to r efl ect diffe rences in amounts of -3- unit quantities actually installed over those shown in the original contract. The deduction of $31,274.50 was due principally to the fact that it was not necessary to use chemical grout for the tunnel construction under the San Diego Freeway, the cost of which was provided for on a unit price basis in the contract. Item No. 54 is the routine resolution accepting the job as complete and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Completion. Nos. 55 and 56 -SETTLEMENT OF LAWSUIT WITH CITY OF WESTMINSTER: This matter was reported on and discussed at some length at the January Board meeting. Mr. Nissan has advised that he wishes to report on the conclusion of this matter. No. 57 -PURCHASE OF 10-INCH PUMP FOR LOS ALAMITOS PUMPING STATION: To provide for expected increase in flows, the engineers and our maintenance staff are recommending that we purchase, as soon as possible, an additional 10-inch pump. Since it is anticipated that delivery of this pump will take considerable time, it is recommended that bids be taken immediately and that the staff be authorized to award a purchase contract in an amount not to exceed $3,200. District No. 2 No. 61 -REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME BY THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT FOR FINANCING ITS SHARE OF SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR AND PURCHASE OF PLANT CAPACITY: Included with the agenda material is a letter from the Riverside District on this subject and we recommend that the financing deadline be extended to May 15. The staff will be prepared to report in more detail on this subject, if desired. No. 62 -REPORT OF STAFF ON FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS FOR SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR: This matter was discussed at the January 6 adjourned meeting. As stated, Mr. Brown and representatives of the Riverside District attended a meeting with the staff of the State Water Resources Control Board on January 19. He learned that the portion of the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Plant No. 1 to Katella Avenue has a very favorable chance of receiving Federal and State funding, provided that application is made after March 1 (Item No. 63) and complete plans and specifications are submitted to the funding agencies by June 1, 1971. Mr. Brown and I will go into greater detail on this matter at the meeting. The next three items relate to expediting preparation of plans and spec ifications to meet the above-mentioned June 1 deadline . No. 63 -AUTHORIZING FILING FOR FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS FOR SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR: This item is the approval of the necessary Board resolution before State and Federal grants can be applied for. -4 - No. 64 -ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR FROM PLANT NO. 1 TO KATELLA AVENUE: We have asked the District's engineer, Lowry and Associates, to submit a proposal for the necessary final design services for this project. It will be recalled that the District employed this firm last year to do preliminary design work, fees for which have now reached approximately $22,000. The staff has negotiated a lump sum fee in the amount of $283,420 for all required services, with the preliminary design fees to be credited against this amount. We consider this fee reasonable in view of the esti- mated cost ($8.1 million) and complexity of the project and recommend that the proposal, as appearing in the agenda material, be accepted and a contract entered into. No. 65 -EMPLOYMENT OF SOILS ENGINEERING FIRM FOR SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR FROM PLANT NO. 1 TO KATELLA AVENUE: In accordance with the recently adopted policy of all of the Districts, we have soli- cited proposals from four firms recommended by the design engineers for soils investigation necessary in the design of this project. The replies of the four firms to our request are included with the agenda material, together with a letter of recommendation from Lowry and Associates. It will be noted that all four firms have refused to quote definite prices for the work prior to being actually selected for the job. Because of the necessity of getting this work under way at the earliest possible moment and in view of the recommendation of Lowry and Associates, it is recommended that the staff be authorized to negotiate with the firm of Geolabs-California, Inc., Santa Ana, to provide the necessary services for a fee not to exceed $15,000. We have compared this fee with similar recent work and find it to be reasonable. -5- Fred A. Harper General Manager ~ REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Mr. Harper reported that the State Water Resources Control Board has announced a public hearing to be held on February 18th concerning proposed regulations for administering State and Federal construction grants. As previously reported one of the staff's primary concerns is in the definition of interceptor sewer. The proposed regu:ations also provide that grants shall not be allowed for that portion of the facility designed to provide capacity exceeding twice that needed to serve existing development or the projected 20-year needs, whichever is the more restrictive. Mr. Harper pointed out that the Districts interceptors are designed to provide capacity based on the land use plans of the sewered cities and the county and that this provision might notcpply in the Districts case inasmuch as ultimate requirements are derived from these basic master plans of the local sewering agencies. .... 2/10/71 WARRAN'J1 NO. 14814 14815 14816 llt817 14818 14819 14820 14821 14822 14823 14824 14825 14826 14827 14828 14829 14830 lli831 148~2 14833 14834 1 1 ~-835 14836 14837 14838 ·1483() llJ-840 14841. llt 8Ji2 lh8h3 llJ.84-4 llf 8JJ.5 148'-~6 14847 1481+8 lhg4g 14850 14851 14852 14853 14854 14855 14856 14857 14858 14859 14-860 14861 14862 14863 14864 14865 14866 iJ.1-867 11-~868 14869 14870 11+871 14-872 JOINT OPERL\TING FUND WARRAHTS IN FP.VOR OF A-1 Stanton Rentals, Equipment Rental $ AMSA, 1971 Membership (MO 1-13-71) Adept Mfg., Inc., Pump Parts All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings Allied Bolt ~ Supply, Small Hardware Amoco Chemicals, L3b Supplies City of Anaheim, Power The Anchor Packing Co., Pump Parts Anaheim Dodge, Truck Parts Apco Supply, Controls Aquatic Ce~ter, Air Card Associated Concrete Products, Manhole Sections Ra~ph W. Atkinson Co., Pump Parts Barksdale, Valve Parts Bearing Specialty Co., Pump Parts Becker Pump & Engr. Co., Pump Bearings Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repairs Bird Machine Co., Centrifuge Parts Blower Paper Co., Janitorial SuppJ~es Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Magneto Repairs Buck's Welding Works, Westslde Bypass Welding C & R Reconditioning Co~, Pump Repair Certified Labs, Inc., Chemicals College Lumber Co., Inc., Small Hard~are Compressor Systems: Inc., Freight In Colsolidated Elect. Dist., Inc., Electrical Supplies Consolidated Freightways, Freight Continental-Emsco Co., Truck parts Constructors Supply Co., Small Hardware & Tools Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Deaver Mfg. Co., Truck Parts John M. Deck Co., Small Hardware Diesel Control Corp., Gover~or Repairs Don's Lawn Mower Shop, Equipmer;.t Repair Clark Dye Hardware, Small Tools Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Enterprise Printing Co., Printing Supplies Fiberglass Specialties, Panels for Sed. Basins Fischer & Porter Co., Chlor. Parts & Controls Foss Co., Lab Supplies Fowler Equipment, Inc., Equipment Rental Fredson Co., Truck Parts Freeway Machine & WeldiDg Shop, Machining City of Fullerton, Water GAF Corp., Reproductior~ Supplies Gaines Electric Supply Co., Electrical Equipment Gar Wood Truck Equipment, Truck Equipment Garden Grove Lumber & Cement Co .. , Bldg. Materials General Electric Supply Co., Electrical Supplies General Telephone Co. Georgia-Pacific Corp., Chlorine Glidden-Durkee Co., Paints Goldenwest Fertilizer Co., Grit Removal Goorlall Rubber Co., Safety Supplies Graybar Electric Co., Inc., Electrical Supplies Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Parts & Repair Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting & C.O.D~ Expense Harron, Rickard & McCone Co., Equipment Rental William P. Hayden, Employee Mileage -·8- . ' P.Momrr"'-"" 100.00 1,250.00 120.00 191.10 203.05 140.40 12.50 472.79 - 11.54 . 21.11 15.50 1,201.69 25.11 633.22 146. 63 26.25 163.50 216.85 79.96 402.62 89.S.oo 95.00 85.75 25;. 7< 13.6~ 894.95 97.6€1 77.93 839.23 510.17 37.80 17.68 195.68 88.39 22.09 119.30 63.84 1,764.00 3,164.86 21.00 1,657.38 41.66 512.40 4.14 4.95. 76 2,127.30 443.76 153.35 246.2.- 856.4~' 31, 884 .. 83 142.24 768.00 155.30 222.60 122.64 149.04 207.70 30.30 . ' ALL DI ST RICTS Ac c epting propo s al of J ohn Ca r ol lo Engineers , for pr e p aration of plan s and speci f ications fo r Interim Pum p St a tion and Additi ons to BYP a.s s Faciliti es at Pl a nt J\f '.). 1 , J ob No . I -7 -3 2/10/71 Moved , seconded and duly carri e d : That the proposal of John Carollo Eng ineers, dated February 3 , 1 9 71 , for engineering servic es fo r the preparation of plans and specifications for Interim Pump Station and Addit ions to Bypass Facilities at P l ant No . 1, J ob No . I -7 -3, b e a pproved as r ecommended by the s taff ; and , That the G er~e ral Manage r be authorized to dire ct the engineers t o proceed with said work for a total am ount not to exceed $10 ,500 .00 ; and, That payme nt for said se rvices is hereby authori zed to b e ma .d e i n accord ance with the terms and conditions contained in the agre em ent wi th J ohn Carollo Eng ineers , dated July 1, 1970 . ALL DISTRICTS Letter fr om City of Cos ta Mesa r e : use o f tre ated effluent f or irr i g ation purpos es , r ec e i ve d o rde r ed filed . a nd r e f e rre d t o Ex ecutive Comrn i ttee Mov e d, seconded and duly carri ed : That t h e letter f rom City of Costa Mesa, dated Fe bruary 9 , 1 971, relative to use of the Districts' treate d efflu ent for irrigation purpos e s at the Cos ta Me s a Golf and County Cl ub, b e r eceive d, ordere d fil e d , and r eferred to the Executive Commi tt ee Board . for stu dy and report b ack to the ALL DI STR I CT S Ce rtific ation of the Gene ral Manage r , r e - ceived a nd ordered fj_l ed the m to b e in orde r, and payme nt , be r e c eived and ALL DIS TR ICTS Ap proval of Joint Opera.t ing Fund , Ca p ital Outlay Re v o lving Fund , and Oce an Outfall No . 2 Construc t i on inspecti on Re - volving F und warrant b o o k s Moved, s e c onded and duly carr ied : That the written ce r tificati on of the Ge neral Manag er that h e has p e r sonall y checke d all bills appearing o n t h e a genda , f ound that h e r ecomm e nds authori z ation for ordered f i led . Mov e d, second e d and duly carried by roll call vote : That the Dist r icts ' Joint Operating Fund , Capital Outlay Revol vin g Fund and Ocean Outfal l No . 2 Con struction Inspection Revo l ving Fund warrant b ooks be a p prove d fo r s i g nature of the Chai rman o f Distri ct No . 1 , and that the County Auditor be authorized and d i rect e d to pay : J oint Operating Fund Ca.pi tal Outl ay Revolving Fund Oc e an Ou tfa l l No . 2 Con s truction Ins p e ~ti o n Re vol ving Fund $ $ 107,587 .89 20 2 ,392 .16 17,3 6 0 .L~l 3 27, 3L~O . 46 in a cc o rda nc e with the fo l l owin g wa rr ant s ; -7 - ... ,, Category Division Code BarCode Next Available BarCode Folder Number Folder Title Folder Date District Number Board Action/ Award Date Resolution Number Description Comments Grantor Permanant Location Vendor Job/Contract Number Purchase Order No. Contract Date Renew a I I Extensions Board Acceptance/Completion Date Recorded Date and Number Record Series Code Event Code Closed/Completed Destruction Date Destruction Hold Destroyed Date Creation Date RMS Created by First Name RMS Created by Last Name RMS Created by User Id RMS Created on Date RMS Created on Time Department Number Department Name Department Code Division Number Division Name RMS Modified by First Name RMS Modified by Last Name RMS Modified by User Id RMS Modified on Date RMS Modified on Time Record Number Record Series Name Record Series Description ~ Record State RMS Current User ID ~ Value (Costa Mesa, City of 2-71 -All) 151 019095067260 (019095071576) cos Costa Mesa, City of 02/10/1971 All 02/10/1971 Page 1 of2 Agreement for use of Districts' treated effluent for the Costa Mesa Golf Course City of Costa Mesa 143 CONTRACTS/ AGREEMENTS, BOARD APPROVAL REQUIRED Closed, Completed FALSE http://magnesium:8081/Image2000/jsp/coding_print.jsp?objectType=NRT200&objectld=529 3/1/2007 Rms State Type of Document RMS Owner Id RMS Customer Id Action Date Work Order Number Change Order Number Sup Agree Number Contract Number Reference Number Corporate Name Instrument Number Recording Date Keyword Page 2 of2 http://magnesium:8081/lmage2000/jsp/coding_print.jsp?objectType=NRT200&objectld=529 3/1/2007 '-.. l.~ MONTGOMERY R E S EA R C H I N C. 0 I V I S I 0 N 0 F J A M !' c, M M 0 r: T G 0 ~~ 0: R Y C 0 N S U L T I N G F N G 1 N E E" R c, : N C 555 EAST WALNUT STREET. PASADENA. CALIFORNIA 91101 <213l 796-9141 November 2, 1971 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box5175 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Fred A. Harper Gentlemen: r.."..., --.~ ~1 'J'l..:f-·-";' ·-,-~· ....... "'""'~ ........ -...... •f///.&.~J..1"""""5" .L (213> 681-4255 Confirming our meeting of Friday, October 29, with Mr. Ray Lewis, this letter outlines the recommended procedures for the Costa Mesa Golf Course Irrigation Study. The objective of this two-month study is to learn the effects of spreading secondary e££l~ent a.r.d a ble~d cf se~o~da!"y effl~c!'lt and bc2..l v.rcll v;atc!" on the various grasses and soils of the golf course. An area of approxi- mately 100 ft by 100 ft has been designated as the test site. This test site is located on the green, fairway and rough of hole No. 15 next to the fire station and City vehicle service yard on the south-central side of the g-01£ course. The test site will be divided into two 100-ft by 50-ft test strips (see Fig. 1), labeled Test Area A and Test Area B. Test Area A will be watered with secondary effluent and Test Area B with a mixture of effluent and local well water. A 50:50 mixture will be used at first and, pending the outcome of c.ai-lj ~c;:;ts, uLl.i.e:c 111ix~u.r e::; rnay be tried. The recommended procedure is to fill the hauling truck assumed to be a 5 00-gal tank truck provided by the City, at the treatment plant following the addition of a predetermined quantity ( 10 grams at first) of HTH disinfectant. The load will then be hauled to the test site and pumped into the sprinkler system. A portable self-priming pump for this purpose will be rented to the City by our firm. Two-thirds of the load (333 gal) will be spread onto Test Area A. During this spreading period, a 1-qt sample will be collected. A portion of the sample will be used for bacteriological examination, residual .._.,. ~ 0 N T G 0 M E R Y County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County R E S E A R C H -2- .., I N C 0 R P 0 R A T E D November 2, 1971 chlor.ine, pH, and electrical conductivity analyses and the remainder stored in a refrigerator for the formation of a weekly composite. Since daily coliform counting is required by the Orange County Health Department, it is important to have this test done at a nearby lab with qualified personnel. If possible, we would appreciate having these counts and the stated analyses perforrned at your District laboratory. The informa- tion obtained would be mutually valuable in that it would meet the Health Department's requirements of our study and would define the disinfection requirements of the plant effluent for future use in any such reclamation projects. The weekly water sample composite should be formed by mixing the daily ~amples in proportion to the quantity of water applied thus forming propor- tional-to-flow composites. The composites will then be sent to a commercial laboratory or to ouT Firm' R lab in Pasadena for analyses of sodium, potassiun1, calciurn, magnesiurn, bicarbonate, carbonate, and chloride. The remaining 167 gal per load will be blended with 167 gal of well water pumped from a nearby pond into the truck. The truck will then be emptied by spraying its contents on Test Area B. In this manner, each test area _will receive the same quantity of water. Tensiometers will be installed in the fairway area and in the green to help determine the amount of water required and the watering frequency. Initially, the ~preading schedule wiJl be one 1oa.d per d.a.y for seven day= c-. 'N~ek. Alternative schedules may be used if the tensiometer readings indicate such changes are feasible. A plastic sheet will be used to cover the test area during periods of rainfall to block out variations due to the weather. Golf course personnel will be available throughout the study to insure that such covering of the test plot is ~one only when necessary. Soil samples will also be taken and analyzed for electrical conductivity, sodium, calcium, magnesium, and nitrogen concentrations in the saturated soil extract. The sampling procedure will consist of forming a composite for the soil of the greens and of the fairways for each test area. The corn- posit:es will be formed by mixing 10 individual cores for each composite • • ........ .M 0 N T G 0 M E R y County Sanitation Districts of Orange County R E S E A R C H -3- ~ I N C 0 R P 0 R A T E D November 2, 1'971 The depths of interest at the putting greens is 0 to 3 inches and, for the freeways, 0 to 12 inches. The samples will be composited on site and transferred to a plastic bag, labeled, and transported to a laboratory for analysis. The recommended sampling frequency is at the beginning, middle, and end of the study. A grass growth analysis will be determined on a weekly basis. The green clipping weight of grass from a defined area will be determined for each test plot and compared to that of the other as well as to that of the adjacent golf course area. Also, a visual grading based on human judgment of the grass color. density of stand, and presentability will be determined. This is generally done by requesting the grader to rate the appearance on a scale of 0 to 10 (10 represents ideal grass characteristics). At the beginning, middle and end of the study, grass samples should be analyzed for the . nutrient content to determine if increments attributable to the wastewater effluent nitrog~n ar..d phosphorous content ca~ be fou!1d. If such correlations are found, it may be possible to decrease the amount of fertilizers added to the golf course if future irrigation were done with the secondary effluent. In essence, this outlines the proposed study. If you have any suggestions or questions of further details of the study, please feel free to call me at your convenience. Very truly yours, ~J, T-«~ Rudy J. TeKippe, Ph.D. /ljn Attachment cc: Mr. DuWayne R. Lidke Mr. Ray E. Lewis ----·-. - - -- 0 1;) ~ ~ ...... ft> ~ II ~ G' ~ ~ ~ -" ' ~ ~ " ~ ~ ' ~ ?" '::' i ~· ~ ~ <;)._.. -~ ~ (\ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ \) A:=-= \,) ~ § ~ "'\ ~ ..... ~ ~' t ~ ~ ~ p """: '\ \ -, '\ ~ "' ~ t "' ~ ~ ~ Cit ~nda Item No. Q 5 CITY OF COSTA MESA CALIFORNIA 92626 P. 0. BOX 1200 FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 8121 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Fred: February 9, 1971 FILED In the Office o f the Secretary County ~anitation D istrict No (\\SJ :: - As the Sanitation Districts know, the City of Costa Mesa operates a municipal golf course on the state-owned property adjacent to Fairview State Hospital For several years, we have been experiencing a deterio- rating water source for irrigation water purposes. The City, several years ago, drilled a well on the mesa which is now insufficient for carrying out the irrigation needs for the Costa Mesa Golf and Country Club. In November of 1970, the City of Costa Mesa hi red the James M. Montgomery Cons ulting Engineers, Inc., to conduct a study and report on the irrigation wate r source for the Countr y Club. The primary finding of the engineering s tudy is that the city should begin negotiation s wi th the Sanitation Districts of Orange County for utilization of the secondary treat ed effluent. It i s on this basis that I would request the Sanitation Districts t o give consideration to entering into a joint agreement with the City of Costa Mesa to supply said secondary treated e ffluent for water purposes at the Costa Mesa Golf and Country Club. I will be waiting for your considerations . FS:gab CITY DF l:uaTA MESA CALIFORNIA 92626 P. 0. B.OX 1200 FROM THE OFFICE OF THF-CITY MANAGER Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager County Sanit~tion Districts P. 0. Box 8121 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Fred: February 9, 1971 As t ( i e S a 11 i t a t i o n D i s t r i c t s k n o i.v , t h e C i t y o f Costa Mesa operates a municipal golf course on the state-owned property adjacent to fairview State Hospital. For several years, we have been experiencing a deterio- r a t i n g w a t e r s o u r c e f o r i r r i g a t i o n "'a t e r p u r p o s e s ·. T h e C i t y , s e v e r a l y e a r s a g o , d r i l l e d a we l l o n t h e me s a vt h i c h i s n ow i n s u f f i. c i e n t f o r c a r r y i n g o u t t h e · i r r i g a t i o n n e e d s for lhe Costa Mesa Golf and Country Club. In November of 1970, the City of Costa Mesa hired the James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc., to conduct a study and report on the irrigation water source for the Country Club. The primary finding of the engineering study is that the city should begin negotiations with the Sanitation Districts of Orange County for utilization of the secondary treated effluent. It is on this basis that I would request the Sanitation Districts to give consideration to entering into a joint agreement with th~ City of Costa Mesa to supply said secondary treated effluent for water purposes at the Costa-Mesa Golf a'nd Country Club. FS:gab will be waiting for your considerations. S i n ce r~e / 1 y • ,.,,.J.;-<'J.._,.- Uf ~ ~v-'' ~·s· RSABAL CITY MAtJAGER Agenda Item No. [) 5 - CITY OF l:DST!i I\'iESA CALIFORNIA 92626 P. 0. BOX 1200 ™ ·mm :s: FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY MP.NAGER Mr. Fred A. Harper Genera 1 Man ager County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 8121 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Fred: Febru'ary 9, 1971 As the Sanitation Districts kriov·.J, ti1e City of Costa Mesa operates a municipal golf course on the state-owned property adjacent to Fairview State Hospital. For several years, we have been experiencing a deterio- rating water source for irrigation water purposes. The City, several years ago, drilled a well on the mesa which is now insufficient for carrying out the irrigation needs for the Costa Mesa Golf and Country Club. In November of 1970, the City of Costa Mesa hired ihe James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc., to conduct a study and report on the irrigation w~ter source for the Country Club. The primary finding of the engineering study is that the city should begin negotiations with t'1e Sanitation Districts of Orange County for utilization of the secondary treated effluent. It is on this basis that I would request the Sanitation Districts to give consideration to entering into a joint agreement with the City of Costa Mesa to supply said secondary treated effluent for water purposes at the Costa Mesa Golf and Country Club. FS:gab I wil 1 be waiting for your considerations. Sincerely ~/;~.v;tY~ A~!(ci s~lBAL &/f, I TY MANAGER Item #3 -Mayor only representative entitled to alternate Act provides that mayor i s automatically member of t h e Board; provides that if that mayo r is unable to attend he may have an a.l ternate attend in his pl ace -that person by counc il action is offic ial alte rnate -those cities entitled to two members on same boa.rd -mayor and one appointed r epresentative by bo a rd act i on . Mayor onl y i s entitled t o alternate . Possibility of getting a. provision in a.ct providing f or al terna.te for sanitary d istrict s and those memb e rs of t he b oards who a.re not mayors . a.ct referred to is State Heal th and Safety Code . Ea.ch city i f represented and ea.ch delegate c an take matter CLARK back to his own council . RIMNEX REQUESTED THAT THE SECTION IN THE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE ABOUT APP OI NTING REPRESENTAT IVE TO SAN I TATION DI STR I CTS BOARD BE MAILED TO EACH CITY COU NCIL REPRESENTED . Ta.ken under advisement by staff and general counsel #.. Item #11 -Called executive and building committee me e ting f or February 23rd, Tuesday at 5:30 p .m. Directors Harvey and Finnell t o a ttend -both a.re able . Presentation of certificates from Californi a. Water Pollution Cont rol Asso ciation to Elmer Smi t h, Gra.)?i de III and Wi lliam 8-v~s ~ (?), Grade IV. Item #12 -I n troduced Ray Lew is -graduate of USC with masters degree in civil engineer ing -licensed in California, Neva.d @, Utah and Arizona; pr evi ous ly with the District s in 1 960 -61 ; started again in 1 5th of January. Has been in ~~~lfXM pr i vate ]m::s:xNRXK State and Federal r egul ations -with regard to interceptor sewers, Public hearing to be held on the 18th of this month . There is a. problem :i,.n design ca.pa.bili ty -concern with intercept or sewer -X~X~ be designed twice present need ~X or for twenty year need -lflifilHD{~}l[XIXfiliX~Jffi our design is now based on land use -the regulations state that the lower of the two XXXM figures will be used (two times present need or twenty year need) Item #14 -Miller reported on executive committee recommendations preliminary NiirnX}I[~ design of a.ddi tion to administration building vehicle maintenance building not presented a.t this meeting because building committee wanted to review wi th staff to make sure not over building R.M:MXM:1'i Rules of procedures for meetings -consent calendar - time saver for boards X:XMX #6 of Exe cu ti ve Committee .report -Hunt -our standards a.re more rigid ba.cteriologica.lly but thei r s tandards on pa.per a.re more rigid . Miller -criticism come up at Boa.rd of Supervisors meet i ng re : Santa. ana -Riverside project -requests were made that .KXK our water quality boa.rd have regulati ons a.s good a.s San Diego 1 s so that our beach water be as pure as t he i rs . He.rper -Exe cu ti ve Officer of our regional board does not agree that some of restrictions based on San Diego region are correct . They have spent a lot of money on laboratory work_, etc . but information being stored and not used . Question : On What basis did Board of S-qpervisors adopt and se t San Diego X~XQ§:X region a.s example? Battin : Orange Cou~ty standiu:r.ds_, per report of Orange County Flood Control ID{NXWX:Ki~f~ District_, a.re not as restrictive r/!!}if as San Diego 's . Board of~~~ Superviso r s approved Right of Way conditioned on tightening up of regulations to be at leas t as stringent as San Diego region . Hunt -the Execut i ve Officer of this regional board did not have ~~~Na SD regional standards Bas i c d i fferences between city of San Diego regulations adopted December 8, 1960 are : 1 . They have a heavy metal limitation -we do not but are presently working on a list 4 times the length of thei rs 2 . Suspended solids -their waste water much weaker and more domestic and less industrial; less suspended solids coming into plant -1 25 parts per million compared to Los Angele:s: 200 -30 0 parts per million - ours approximately 150 parts per million Presently we have much more knowledge than 10 years ago when SD standards established. Both boards could set better standards now . Our outfall regulations are much more stringent than San Diego 's (70/100 compared to 10000/100) Nissan -use of ROW can not be comditioned like this by BofS Battin -feels that i t legally can be conditioned as stated Meeting this am wi th liaison committee on setting regulations for limitation on heavy metals . We have section of discharge of toxic materials injurious to marine environment -reviewed with regional board and SCCWRPA . Board of Supervisors report based on staff report by Flood Control District -Question : Do Board of Supervisors realize that agreement with Riverside is protection that the i r discharge meets are discharge re quirements~ Staff will be pre senting amendment to ordinance more restricti1ie than any oth e r oc ean discharger (most overal l limiting o rdinance) -Will protect marine environment . Send cover letter a long with t h is to Boa.rd of Supervis ors and other entitie s telling them what we a.re doing , etc . Go on r ecord defending our pos ition . 15b -Ruffing , Paul -ma.de p re ~ation of plans ~or additi on to building 16 -Film shown on construction of ocean outfall -H. Hunt all pipe is now i n place -rocking of pipe should be completed by end of next we e k . Remedial work shoul d be done two weeks Executive Session 25 . Letter from Costa. Mesa. referred to executive commit t ee for study . ) 38 . Nrbsson -temporary working license agreement with Ba.ck Bay Park r enegoti ated -contractor has until 9th of July ori g i nal negotiation set work to be completed not later than the end of April -X1§.M'XMNIDi additional cost of right of way for month of Apri l :$~X®:®: $3000 -$1 5 0 for each day in Ma.y, $200 for ea.ch da.y in June -$267 for each day in July -some of these costs will not be reimbursed by contractor . 5 3 -Grouting not r e quir ed -this is why big reduction in cost 55 . Three motions -sucessful in cost a.nd unsucessful on other two (new t r ial and appeal) -accept sum of $7, 500 in lieu of $8,500 plus cos t s if we agree not to app e al - GJ1A/~ r1 /l1J I Cotmty S'1nitat km Di stri cts of O!oilg e C•.:nmty; Caiifornia P. 0 . Box 5175 1081.tA Elli s Av enuP Foun tain Valley, C il i F., 92708 (1) (2) § (4) (5 ) (6) ( '7 . . ) (8 \ . ) (9 ) (10) JOI N T BOJ\RD~S ============-- Feb ruary 10, 1 9 71 -7 :30 p .m . Pledge of Allegiance an.d Invo cation Ro J.l Ca.11 ADJOURNMENTS POST ED./ COMP & MILE AGE ...... L .. ~1~:~L~~~o~;-~·iR~~o .. V- LEnrns WRITTE N ..... V.:. MINUTES WRITIEN .. ~ .• MINUTES HLED ....... V.::: .. . Appoi ntments of Chairmen pro tem, i:f necessary 'i) a-f\-:,"' # 5 DIS TRICT 1 -Conside1·ation of motion approving m1nu tes of the regul Ft.i' I mee ting held January 13 , 1971 , and tl1e a.d,i ournecl meeting /Y) S the r eof hd.J Ja.nu.a.:cy 28_, 1 971 , as ma iled DISTRICT 2 ) Con.sid.(~rat i on o f ' mo-cior1 app roving minutes of ·t:.he r egular JV1 8 rneeti.ng held Ja.rma ry 13 , 1 97 1, as mailed DISTRICT 3 I C ori s:.i.derat j_on of' rn.ot,:wn app roving min utes of the rcguJ a.r /V1 S meP~~.ing held Janua.ry 13, 19~(1.~ as ma.iJ.ed DISTRICT 5 I -c·oris ide:i:·o~ti on of rJ.otion ap:!,;roving m:Lnutes of the regular M S n"ee-i-i· ng h :..Jc' JaJ~11 a Y'v , -~ 1 9'7 , a'· r_n-"'i· ..L., erl II v -H::. -; v.C -v J.__,) --{ ..L ; .:> ~ "'- DIS'.I'iUCT 6 ~Consid2ra.tion of motion approving minutes mec.;tj_ng held J"a.nuary 13.:. 1 97 1, a.s ma2.led DIS'J:'nICT 7 o.f the regvla:c Cons io.eZ.at 1.on of motion a.pproving rninut1;:;s of the r egular meeting held Janua.:ry 13> 1971_, as mailed DISTRIC'J: 11 -Con s Lleration of motj_on approving m:i_Eute s of the re gular m eetin~ held Ja.nuary 1 3 , 1 9 '71, a s malled ALL DI S 'l:I'.IC'TS -'f-\eport of the Joj_nt Chairman ALL DISTRI CTS -J:~eport of t he Ge n e ra.1 Manager ALL DISTH I C'TS Rspori., of t11e Exe-: cu ti ve c:md Dull ding Connrd ttces , a.nd cons:i..derat i on of motion to :cecei v e anci. file the Conrn.:L ttees 1 written report, ~ (15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of ac t i on on items r ecomme nded by Executive and Buildi n g Committees (a) Consideration of Resolution No . 71-1 1, approving pl ans and s pecifications for I Modification of Parking Facilities for M S Administration Building , Job No . Pl -12-5 ; and authorizing advert ising for bids to be opened March 3, 1 9 71 at 1 1 : 00 a .m; and authorizing District No . 1 to award contra.ct . See page 11 D11 Q Cons ideration of motion ap provi ng preliminary fV1 S "Ptlns for Administration -Engineeri ng Building Addition (c) Con s ideration of motion authorizing the \ General Manager t o direct John Carollo Eng i nee rs M S to prepare a report on t he fe asibility and costs i nvolved in joint use with Irvine Ranc h Water District in Districts ' disposal facilities , the cost o f said repor t to be reimbursed by Irvi ne Ranch Water Dis trict ( d ) considerat i on of motion approving placing M\s certain routine itef'.ls on a consent calendar; and authori z ing t he General Cou nsel to p r epare an amendment to 11 Rules a n d Procedures for .['.-ieetings 11 r el ative to the consent ca.lendar (e) Consideration of motion directing the staff r \..QJ to fully investigate a.nd develop a meaningful ~' wate r conse rvati un p rog ram within the Districts @ Consideration of motion to r eceive and orde r ed filed , Resolution No . F71 -2 of the Boar d of Supe rvisors of the County of Orange , date d January 1 2 , 1971 , with r espect to j oint use o f District facilities by Rivers ide County Flood Control and Wate r Conse rvation Dj_strict ; and consideration of Resolution No . 7 1 -13 , establishing policy with respect to protection of benefic i al uses of ocean wate r and r equestin g t he California Regional Water Quality Control Board to review e x isting waste discharge re quir emYfl~ See page.s _"E !' and 11 F 11 ~ ~~t)~~~(}VJ\~ Q ALL DISTRICT S ,---CJ ~ Verbal report of Engineers on Ocean Outfal l No . 2 , Marine Section, Job No . J -1 0 , const r uct i on ALL DISTRICTS Con side r a tion of mot ion to r ece ive a nd f ile Quarte rly Financial Report submitte d by Han s on, Peterson , Cow les and Sylvester , Certified Publ i c Accountants , f or the period endj_ng Sep t ember 30 , 1970, prevlously mailed to Dir ec tors ((18)) ALL DISTRICTS ~ Conside ration o:!:' r~10tlon to r ece iv e and file report of Director of Fina.nee on mid -year budget review -2 - (19 ) ALL DI STR I CTS (20 ) Conside r at i on of mo tion app r ov i ng Ch ange Or d e r No . 1, t o p lans and specifi cations f or 7 50 KVA Dist ribution Se r vice T r ans f orme r for Plant No . 2 _, Job No . J -4 -A_, l grant i ng a11 extens i on of time of 8 calendar day s to N\ S t he con t ract with Gene r al Elect r i c Supp l y Company . See p age 11 G" ·--- ALL DI STR I CTS Co n sideration of mot i on to receive and file l e t te r s 1 f rom John Carollo Engineers and Peter Kiewit Sons 1 A~ S Company , and grant i ng a. one da.y time extension for iv I completion of Ocean Outfal l No . 2 -Marine Sect i o n_, Job No . J -1 0 . See pages "H" and 11 I 11 (21) ALL DISTR I CTS Cons i de r a.tJon of mot i on auth or i z i ng attendan ce of I on e staf f member a t a. join t mee t ing of t he Association o f Met r opolitan Sewe r ing Agencies and the Water Al1 Po l l ution Control Federation i n Wash i n g ton_, D.C. /'I S March 1 5th and 16th; and authorizing payment for travel, me a.ls , l odging and inc i dental expenses incurred (22 ) ALL DISTRIC TS Conside rati o n of mot i on accepting proposal o f J ohn Carollo Engineers _, dated February 3, 1 971 , for engi neering services for the preparation of plans a.nd specifications for Interim Pump Station and Addition s to Bypass Facilities at Plant No . 1 , Job No . I ·-7 -3 , fo1· a. fee not to e xc eed $10 ,500 , as r ecomme n ded by the s t aff . See page 11 J 11 (23) ALL DI STR I CTS Consideration of mot i on to receive and file cert i fics,tion of the Gen e ra.l Ma.na.ger that he fV\ S has c heck e d a.11 bills appearing on the agenda._, foun d them to be in order_, and that he recommends a u thorization for payment (24 ) ALL DISTRICTS \ Con s idera.tj.on of motion approvi ng Joint Operat i ng_, ~\ Ca.pi ta.l Outla.y Re volv i ng, and Construction I nspec t ion r Revo l ving Fund warrant bool<s for signature of the Chairman of District No . l,and authorizing payment of c l aims listed on page 11 A" Q ALL DI STR I CTS Q Other business and communicat i o n s , i f any ...____P (26 ) (27) DISTR I CTS 1 & 7 Con ~iderati on of Resolution No . 7 1 -1 4 , approv i ng l I nter-District Basic Construct i on, Maintenance , /\/\ $ and Opera.ting Agreement , 1~e1a ti ve to Ma.in -Dyer r ' \ I nt erceptor, Contract No . 1 -12 . See page "K" DISTF.ICTS 1 & 7 Cons i deration of Resolution No .. 7 1-2 1, ~uthor i zing \ exe cu ti on of a t.eHFft-e-:e-~w:G-~~J-'k'lfi'@ with A. J . fl\ S Gi sler , et al, in connec t ion with construction of Sunflower Intercepto r , Contract No . 7 -6 -1 , for a tota.l cost of $1 , 659 . 00 . See page "L __ 11 __ ) ~ 1../7, ~ -3- (28) DISTR I CTS 1 & 7 .. Consideration of Re solution No . 71-22 , aut horizing /\/11 acceptance of easemept from A. J . Gisler , e t a.l , ''I S in connecti on with construc t ion of Sunflower Interc e pto , Contract No . 7 -6-1 , for a totai cos t of $14 ,694 .oo . See page 11 M11 (29) DISTRICTS l & 7 Consideration of motion approving suspense f und /\A 0 war rant s , if any . See page 11 C11 f 'I () (30) DIST RICT 1 Consideration of mo tion accepting proposal of Boyle Engine e ring, dated February 4 , 1971 , for engineering services for the preparation of plans and specifications for Ma.in -Dyer Interceptor , Contra.ct No . 1 -12, fo r a basic fee of $23,10 0 .00, a.s r e comme nded by the s taff . See page 11 N11 (31) DI STRICT 1 Consideration of Resolution No . 71-19-1, autho ri zing execution of Quitclaim Deed to A. J . Gisler, relative to construction of Sunflowe r Inte rc eptor Sewer , Con tra.ct No . 7 -6 -1 . S ee page 11 0 11 (3 2 ) DISTRICT 1 Cons i deration of Resolution No . 7 1 -20 -1, a uthorizing "/\ 0 acceptance o f easement from A . J . Gis le r, rel a.t i ve / v I 0 to construction of Sunflower I nterceptor Sewer , Contract No . 7-6-1. See page 11 p 11 ( 3'2N_ DI ~I CT °h ~~ '"othe)~busi~ss ~d (35) DISTRI CT 1 Cons i oera.tion of motion to adjourn t o Tuesday , Febru ary IV\ S 23, 1 97 1 a.t 5 : 00 p . m. Q 1 () 0 , , ("' p,w-z_· DIST RICT 5 -Conside ration of Resolution No . 71-15 -5, approv i ng annexation of' t e rritory to the District, ''Annexation No . 4 to County Sanit ation District No . 5 ". See page 11 Q" -=-(~7-+-flli¥.PRf€I:P-5- =-&ens-:L de r a.t-:i.. 0n o-f-rne-tion_app.r:n_~, i f any . --See page ''B 11 e D~~~=~C~u~i n ess and communica.ti ons , if a.ny ' (3 9 ) DISTRICT 5 Con s i de ration of motion to adjourn q',i~ ~-'("(\ · (40) DISTRICT 6 -Ge-:r:rs-i deration of rnotion approving wa.rr am=-s,---i--~. S e-e-p-age----1!-·(-7-'-'-1 1 ~~~~- -LJ.- (42) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (43) DISTRICT 7 ~ Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. M S See page "c" · (~4) DIST~ICT 7. . . . ~ B . .t_he'r. bus~~s~~olbmy~a~'-_ i~an)\, ( 45) DrsrrRICT 7 Consiaeration of motion to adjourn to Tuesday, February 23, 1971 at 5:00 p.m. {46) DISTRICr:E1 11 C\I ~L\ ~ ~ -'('('\ • Cons.id€sra.tion of motion a.pp roving warrants, if any·• _See page II c" (47) DISTRICTS 3 & 11 fund f"\\ S Consideration of motion approving suspense warrants, if any. See page "B" ( 4~ DIS~RICT 11 \ . ' -~Other busin~s ~comht~nic~~tiops,\2-f any ( 49) DISTRICT 11 Oi • l1 Lt Consideration of motion to .adjourn \ £ -1 \ (50) (51) (52) (54) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motim approving Change Order No. 3, to the plans and specifications for Westside Interceptor Facilities, Los Alamitos Pumping Station, Contract No. J 3-12, granting an extension of time of 29 calendar days to the contra.ct with Merco Construction Engineers. fV1 S See page "R" DIS·rRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2, ) to the plans and specifications for Westside In~erceptor S Facilities, Westminster Avenue Force Main -First Unit, fi1 Contract No. 3-13, granting an extension of time of 30 calendar days to the contract with J. L. Scott Company. See page 11 s 11 DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3, .. to the plans and specifications for Westside Interceptor ) Facilities, Westminster Avenue Interceptor Sewer, fV1 S Contract No. 3-14, authorizing an deduction of $564.oo, from the contract with K. E.. C. Company. See page "T" Consideration of motion approving Cha..Dge Order No. 4, ISTRICT 3 l to the plans and specifications for Westside Interceptor fV1 .S Facilities, Westminster Avenue Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-14, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities and a deduction of $31,274.50, to the contract with K. E .. c. Company. See page II U11 DISTRICT 3 Consideration of Resolution No. 71-16-3, accepting Westside Interceptor Facilities, Westminster Avenue Interceptor SeNer, Contract No. 3-14, as complete; and authorizing execution of a. Notice of Completion therefor. See page "v" -5- .. 0 DISTRICT 3 ·· ~ Report of the Gene ral Counsel on Case No . 160579, City of Westminster vs . Dist r ict No . 3, et al (56) DISTRICT 3 <:,/ Consideration of motion authoriz i ng payment of ~) ~\ $7,500 to the City of Westminste r i n settlement 2.. 1't1 o f Case No . 160579 ; and authori zing t h e General ,_. t-Counsel to sign a wa rrant demand for said amount M\s (57) DISTRICT 3 . Considere.tion of Resolution No . 71-1 7 -3, approving 1 >..._V specifications for One , 10 " Vert ic al Sewage Pump , M S ~~ Contract No . 3 -12-A; and authorizing advertising ' for bids to be opened February 26, 1971 at 11 :00 a .m. See page "W" (58) DISTRICT 3 \ Consideration of mot ion app r oving warrants, if any . /\/\ S See page "B" Iv I (~) NSTRI-CT 3 , -\ O"ther '1'1usiitE«ss 'and cow.muni ~tions..., if aj'.ly ....__ ~ ~ ~ "-... ~~ '-' (60) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of mot ion to a.djourn 9 ~ Y 5 ? · vY1 ' ~DISTR ICT 2 ~) Consideration of motion to rec eive and file letter from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District , dated January 20 , 1971 , requesting extension of time for financ ing its share of Santa. Ana River I nterc ep tor and purchase of plant capa.ci ty; a.nd consideration of Resolution No . 71 -18 -3, approving Second Amendment to Waste Water Interceptor Capacity Agreement with Riverside County Flood Cont r ol and Water Conservation District and authori zing e xecution of said Amendment . See pages "X" and 11 y 11 Q DISTRICT 2 0 Verbal report by staff on federal and state grants for Santa Ana River Inte rc eptor from Plant No . 1 t o Katella Avenue, Contracts Nos . 2 -14-1, 2 -1 4 -2, and 2 -14-3 (6;\ DISTRICT 2 . V Consideration of Resoluti on No . 71 -1 0 -2, authori zing and directing execution of filing of documents necessary for federal grant under 33 USC, 466 Et Seq and State Grant under Clean Water Bond Law of 1 970, for Contra.ct s Nos . 2 -1 ~--l, 2 -14-2, and 2-14-3, Santa Ana River Interceptor from Plant No . 1 to Katella Avenue . See page "z " ---- (64 ) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of mo tion accepting proposal of Lowry and Associ ates , dated Ja.nua.ry 25 , 1971, fo r engineering services -Santa. Ana River Interceptor from Pl ant No . 1 to Katella Avenu e , Cont r ac ts Nos . 2-14 -1 , 2 -14-2, and 2-14-3, a.s r ecomm e nde d by the staff , for <:.b asic f ee of $283 ,420 .00 ; and direct ing the Gen e ral Counsel to prepare an agreement for exec ution . See p age "AA 11 -6 - (65) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to nego tiate · a n agre ement for so i ls investigation se rvi ces in connection with Santa Ana River Intercept or from Plant No . 1 to Ka.tella Av e n ue , Contracts Nos . 2 -l 4 -l, 2 -14 -2 , and 2 -14-3, with Geolab s -California, Inc ., for an amount not to exceed $15,000.00. See page "B:a " (66) DISTR I CT . 2 \ Consideration o f motion approving warrants, i f any . M 5 See page "B" ( 6Z ) pI RIC 2 ""-~ Otn r bu in~~~n i~t ·ons ,~f~nY\, (68 ) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion t o adjourn /l ~ ~ r / 5 . S 0 -7- Mee ting Date ~2 ~\QI :::i I Time q::=zio Distric.'t ~ DISTRICT 1 ' JOI NI' BOARD S Gris et / Herrin Culver Miller ./ Coco ---Arbiso Lewis Porter 7 Baum Bog a r d Battin tPifj_ Berton Westra 5 Chr i stie Root DISTRICT 2 Clark Magnu s Davis Bousman Just / Harper Ste p he nson Du t t on Christie j Root Finnel l Gomez ' ,lark 7 Magnus Gibbs 0ulver .,/ Green ---Shiple y Stephenson ":) Dutton Gris et Herrin F inne l l 7 Gomez Harvey Kanel Herri n 7 Gris et Herrin Gris e t Sims ./ Zuniga Hirth Croul Smith Hileman Hyde Kroes en Wedaa ~ Machado J ust Harper Winn f;t Schniepp Mc Inn is Hi rth Battin McWhinney Miller Coco DISTRICT 3 ---Parsons Culver ., Porter Arbiso / Lewis Rogers Hirth Baum ,; Hogard Shipley Coen Berton (,v Westra Sims Zuni g a Christ i e .; Root Smith Hileman Cla.rk 'l Magnus ---Wedaa ---Machado Davis 'J Bousman Winn Schni ep: Stephenson ,/ Dutto n --Battin Green / Shiple y Harvey ./ Kan el Herrin I Griset * * * ,'(-* * Hyde ./ Kroe s en Mitche l l Just ,/ Harper Boyd ---Goldb er1 '1cWhinney ./ --- ims --;;-Zuniga OTHE RS Ba ttin u; ,/ :> Harp e r DI STRICT 5 Bro wn ./ uJ-Sylv e s ter v ~ J Carlson c:: Hirth-=1f Croul Clarke 7 Battin Dunn v Finster V' DISTRICT 6 Galloway / Hohen er --v- Porter ./ Hunt /1.. Mc Innis ./ Hirth Keith ../ Battin ().._,, Lowry ,/ Maddox v DISTRICT 7 Martinson ./ Nisson ~ Miller .,/ Coco Piersall Gris et / He rrin Sigl er ~ Porter Steve n s Ro g ers ../ Hj_rth Crabb / ---Smith ./ Hileman Ba ttin .~ T)I STRICT 11 Shiple y =Ii Co e n Gibb s --- Battin Goldbe r g \ Meeting Date ~.ffii_ T:ime ']·· 3(J Dj_ s trict r~ a\\ DI STRICT 1 .. _:::__;!!-_ JOI NT BOARDS --·-------·- ~/ i~ V' Gr is e t Herrin Culver Miller i /"" Coco Arb i so ·~/ Le wis Por ter ~v Baum -±_ Hogard Battin Be r ton Westra ---Ch ristie \L Root DI ST RI CT 2 ---Cl ark =±Magnus ---Davis Bousman Just ,/,. Harper Step h e nson v Dutton Chris tie ~Ro ot Finnell v Go mez ""'.lark < Magnus Gib bs v 0u lver -·--@:ifili:7 ShipJey --------::Q, Stephens on 1/ Dutton Gris e t l / Herrin Finnell f>< Gomez Harvey 1./ Kanel Herrin Gris et He rrin l,/ Gris e t ~ Sims 1/ Zuni ga Hirth ~ Croul Smith V Hi lema n Hyde Kroes en Wedaa ?\ Machado J ust V"' Harper Wi nn ,/ Schniepp Mc Innis 1/ Hirt h Battin ~/ McWh i nney _±.. DISTRICT 3 Miller Co c o Par sons Cul ver v . ---Po r ter Arbiso 1/ Lew is Rog e r s ~ Hir th Baum 1/ Bogard Shipley Coen. Berton _a_ Westra Sims Zuni ga, Christie v Ro ot Smith v Hileman Cl ark v Ma g nus ------Wedaa ~M ac hado Davi s 6-Bous man Winn Schniep: Stephenson Dutton ----Bat t in ~ ---Green ~-Shi p l ey Harvey 1./ Kane l He rrin i / Grise t * * * -)(-* * Hyd e v Kroes en Mi t chell Ju st v · Harper Boyd Go l db er1 "1c Wh i nney \./ ---t>i ms \7 Zuniga OT HERS Ba.ttin ((1/ -----Harp e r DISTRICT 5 • Brown ~ Sylvester 7' Par sons ~~-~ Carl son Hirth Croul Cl arke -~ Battin •v Dunn Finster DI STR I C·r 6 Galloway ~ Ho h ene r Porte r Hunt Mc Inni s I/ Hirth Ke ith Battin i!-V Lowry Maddox DIS1rRICT 7 Marti n son :::> Ni ssan Miller ~ Coco Piersal l Gris et v He rrin Sigler Po r ter 1/ Steve ns --Crabb Ro ge rs v Hirth Smith __J/ Hileman CY-o t1 v Battin E/ -- DISTRICT 11 v ----Shipley Coen Gibbs ;li/'· Battin --·---- DIS'I'RICT --- Bo yd Goldb e r g ------Mitche l l ---Ba.tth). ------ RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS February 10, 1971 -7:30 p.m. WARRANT NO. 14814 14815 14816 "'!+817 '-!t4818 14810 14820 14821 14822 14823 14824 14825 14826 14827 14828 1482g l~-830 14831 14832 14833 14834 14835 14836 14837 14838 1483g ll-~840 14841. 1 4842 ~843 14844 14845 14846 14847 14848 llt949 14850 14851 14852 14853 14854 14855 14856 14857 14858 14859 14860 14861 14862 14863 14864 llt865 14866 1 L1.867 ~·+868 J_4869 14870 14871 14872 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF A-1 Stanton Rentals, Equipment Rental $ AMSA, 1971 Membership (MO 1-13-71) Adept Mfg., Inc., Pump Parts All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings Allied Bolt t£ Supply, Small Hardware Amoco Chemicals, Lab Supplies City of Anaheim, Power The Anchor Packing Co., Pump Parts Anaheim Dodge, Truck Parts Apco Supply, Controls Aquatic Center, Air Card Associated Concrete Products, Manhole Sections Ra~ph W. Atkinson Co., Pump Parts Barksdale, Valve Parts Bearing Specialty Co., Pump Parts Becker Pump & Engr. Co., Pump Bearings Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repairs Bird Machine Co., Centrifuge Parts Blower Paper Co., Janitorial Supplies Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Magneto Repairs Buck's Welding Works, Westside Bypass Welding C & R Reconditioning Co., Pump Repair Certified Labs, Inc., Chemicals College Lumber Co., Inc., Small Hardware Compressor Systems, Inc., Freight In Colsolidatec Elect. Dist., Inc., Electrical Supplies Consolidated Freightways, Freight Continental-Emsco Co., Truck Parts Constructors Supply Co., Small Hardware & Tools Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Deaver Mfg. Co., Truck Parts John M. Deck Co., Small Hardware Diesel Control Corp., Governor Repairs Don's Lawn Mower Shop, Equipment Repair Clark Dye HardwaYe, Small Tools Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Enterprise Printing Co., Printing Supplies Fiberglass Specialties, Panels for Sed. Basins Fischer & Porter Co., Chlor. Parts & Controls Foss Co., Lab Supplies Fowler Equipment, Inc., Equipment Rental Fredson Co., Truck Parts Freeway Machine & Weldi~g Shop, Machining City of Fullerton, Water GAF Corp., Reproduction Supplies Gaines Electric Supply Co., Electrical Equipment Gar Wood Truck Equipment, Truck Equipment Garden Grove Lumber & Cement Co., Bldg. Materials General Electric Supply Co., Electrical Supplies General Telephone Co. Georgia-Pacific Corp., Chlorine Glidden-Durkee Co., Paints Goldenwest Fertilizer Co., Grit Removal Goodall Rubber Co., Safety Supplies Graybar Electric Co., Inc., Electrical Supplies Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Parts & Repair Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting & C.O.D. Expense Barron, Rickard & McCone Co., Equipment Rental William P. Hayden, Employee Mileage A-l AMOUNT 100.00 1,250.00 120.00 191.10 203.05 140.40 12.50 472.79 11.54 21.11 15.50 1,201.69 25.11 633.22 146. 63 26.25 163.50 216.85 79.96 402.62 898.00 95.00 85.75 259.76 13.65 894.95 97.66 77.93 839.23 510.17 37.80 17.68 195.68 88.39 22.09 119.30 63.84 1, 76l+. 00 3,164.86 21. 00 1,657.38 41. 66 512.40 4.14 495.76 2,127.30 443.76 153.35 246.27 856.41 31,884.83 1Li2. 24 768.00 155.30 222.60 122.64 149.04 207.70 30.30 WARRANT NO. 11+873 14874 14875 14876 14877 ~·1+878 ~879 14880 14881 14882 14883 14884 14885 14886 14887 14888 14889 lh890 14891 llt892 11+893 11.i.894 14895 14896 14897 14898 14899 14900 14901 14902 ,4903 ~90Li- 1l.j.905 14906 14907 14908 14909 14910 14911 14912 14913 1491lt 11.i-915 14916 14917 14918 14919 14920 14921 14922 1.lt923 1492lt 14925 14926 14927 1 J+928 -929 ~930 14931 lh932 llt933 llt934 IN FAVOR OF Health Education Service, OJT Manuals $ Hertz Equipmental Rent.al-Corp., W/Side Equip. Rental Hill Brothers Chemical Co., Odor Control Honeywell, Inc., Telemetry Supplies & Controls Howard Supply Co., Small Hardware City of Huntington Beach, Water International Harvester Co., Truck Parts Johns-Manville, IAb Supplies Johnston Pump Co., New Pump Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Valves, Small Hardware Fred Keiser, Employee Mileage Kelco Sales & Engr. Co., Valves & Small Hardware Kerm Rima Hardware, Small Hardware King Bearings, Inc., Bearings & Pump Parts Kingmarrn-vlh i te, Inc. , Telemetry Supplies Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts Kleen-Li~e Corp., Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Tools & Hardware LBWS, Inc., Small Tools & Supplies L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Services Lakewood pj_pe Servi.ce, Inc., W/Side Piph1g (MO 1/13/71) Judy Lee, Employee Mileage Leupold & Stevens, Inc., Telemetry Supplies R. W. McClellan & Sons, I~c., Bldg. Material M.AoV. Transportation, Freight Mesa Supply, Small Hardware The Metz Co., Sign . Mine Safety Appliances Co., Safety Equipment Mobil Oil Corp., Gear Lube Moore Systems Div., Metering EquipLlent E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Sections Jean Mosher, Employee Mileage Herbert A. Moss, Special Labor Counsel Retainer Nelson-Dunn, Inc., Engine Parts Newark Electronics Corp., Electrical Supplies City of Newport Beach, Water C . .Arthur Hisson, General Counsel Retainer, CSSDA Conf. Noland Paper Co., Inc., Reproduction Paper Oakite Products, Inc., Solvents Orange County Chemical Co., Solvents Orange County Radiotelephone Serv1ce, Inc. Orange County Wholesale Electric., Electrical Supplies PrE Corp., Conveyor Parts Pacific Telephone Pickwick Bookshops, Lab Manuals Pictorial Sciences, Inc., Aerial Photos Postmaster, Postage Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage Rainbow D!sposal Co., Trash Disposal The Register, Employinent J.~d Santa Ana Electric Motors, New Motor Santa Electronics Co., Electrical Supplies Scientific Products, Lab Supplies S. F. Serrantino, Employee Mileage Sherwin-Williams Co., Paints & Supplies A. H. Shipkey, Inc., Truck Tires John Sigler, Employee Mileage Signal-Flash Co., Barricade Rental Southern California Edison Co., Power Southern California Gas Co. Southern California Water Co. Sparkletts Co., Bottled Water A-2 AMOUNT 34.50 121.50 56.60 718.83 363.38 8.03 267.44 67.70 1,270.50 782.2li 78.90 78.78 18.18 155.17 42.18 1,708.92 179.69 257.50 1,103.62 1,877.27 6,249.79 22.50 36.87 199.50 8.30 411.82 525.20 560. 86 22.52 73.50 259.90 17.85 250.00 156.44 48.46 9.00 960.25 232.16 92.98 10.8'7 322.63 330.75 77.39 341-t. 05 9.40 822.19 500.00 46.02 60.00 114.94 230.30 75.05 155.72 56.lt6 121. 05 92.07 l+o. 62 148.90 15,672.13 l_, 248. 83 11+7. 62 72.77 WARRANT NO. 14935 14936 14937 14938 14939 '+940 ~4941 1491+2 14943 14944 14945 14946 14947 14948 14949 14950 ll~951 14952 14953 14954 14955 14956 14957 l"-1-958 14959 14960 14961 14962 14963 14964 14965 l~-966 14967 l~-968 14969 14970 14971 14972 lh973 14974 14975 14976 14977 14978 14979 14980 IN FAVOR OF Speed-E-Auto Farts, Truck Parts Standard Oil Co., Gasoline & Oil Standard Ready Mix Concrete, Concrete Sully-Miller Co., Ashpalt T & H Equipment Co., Tractor Parts ~ell Steel Inc., Steel Plate Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Bldg. Material Tustin Plumbing & Heating, Lateral Repair Tustin Water Works, Water Union Oil Co., Gasoline Utilities Supply Co., Sweeper Parts Valvate Associates, Freight Vaniman Camera, Photo Processing John R. Waple3 R.S., Odor Consultant Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts & Repair Robert A. Webber, Employee Mileage Russell H. Wheat Co., Small Hardware Whitlock Mfg. Co., New Heat Exchangers (MO 8/12/70) John V. A. Williams, Employee Mileage Willig Equipment Co., Tractor Parts Wilson Engine & Equip. Co., Engine Parts Howard Wilson Co., Machine Equipment Michael J. Wilson, Employee Mileage Russ Wold, Employee Mileage World Travel Bureau, Inc., CSSDA & State Grant Mtg. Danald J. Wright, Employee Mileage Xerox Corp., Reproduction George Yardley Co., Compressor Parts Everett H. York Co., Engine Parts Zep Mfg. Co., Janitorial Supplies TOTAL JOINT OPE~TING CAPrrAL OUTI.J\Y REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT $ 540.46 1,185.12 192.19 48.05 276.28 177.36 57.19 425.50 11.69 39.11 35.31 10.05 88.80 216.20 1,027.82 35.94 50.00 6,027.00 73.10 27.38 309.30 91.00 53.70 65.94 129.96 8.172 732.h3 81.72 }+·75. 52 37.54 $ 107,587.89 John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Serv. -Plant Const. $ Carollo & Keith, Engr. I-8 42,923.84 14,359.00 Fae. 8,324.13 64.33 5,348.28 9,403.20 64,591.32 William P. Ficker, AIA, Architect -Adm, Engr, Veh. Freedom Newspapaer, Inc., Bid Notice Pl-1Rl/P2-1Rl General Electric Supply Co., Contractor J-4A J.E. Hoagland & W.W. Hoaeland, Contractor P2-16 Hood Corp., Contractor Pl-15/P2-15 Peter Kiewit Sons' Co., Contractor J-10 LBWS, Inc., Machine Equipment Lynam-Wo::>d Const., Inc., Contractor P2-18 Near-Cal Corp., Contractor J-11 Pacific Pipe Tool, Line Clean Equipment Dutch Stark Co., Electric Carts (MO 1/13/71) Al Thompson Pump & Equip8, Submersible Pump Twining Labs, Testing P2-18 Wallace Trade Bindery Co., Plans & Specs. P2-17/Pl-1R-l TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING $ A-3 44,740.00 1,109.30 3,742.15 2,004.27 293.49 5,071.50 130.99 27.80 258.56 202,392.16 WARRANT NO. OCEAN OUTFALL f/2 CONSTHUCTION INSPECTION REVOLVING FUND IN FAVOR OF Osborne Labs, Inc., Inspection J-10 Parker Diving Service, Inspection J-10 TOTAL INSPECTION REVOLVING TOTAL JOINT WARRANTS A-l~ $ $ $ AMOUWI.1 11.4. 00 17,316.41 17,360.41 327,340.46 Wl\RRANT NO. 14983 14985 14986 14987 iJ-1-988 14989 14990 ll-1.991 1 LJ.992 ~993 11+994 14995 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR o:p Lowry & Associates, Engineer 2-14 $ DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERl\TING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF C. Arthur Nissan, Legal Service -Westminster Suit $ Cook & Barletta, Inc., Contractor 3-15 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL ourrLAY FUIID WARR11NTS IN FAVOrt OF Anaheim Bulletin, Bid Notice -Vert. Drive Systems $ Boyle Engineering, Engr. & Survey 3-11 K.E.C. Co., Contractor 3-14 Merco Const. Engr., Contr~ctor 3-12 Osborne Labs, Inc., Testing 3-14 J. L. Scott Co., Contractor 3-13 Twining Labs., Testing 3-12 & 3-14 Zarubica Co., Release Retained Percentage 3-11 AMOUNT 2,110.83 254.50 684.46 7.36 16,073.05 70,953.75 33,858.00 18.75 11,000.CO 108.50 60,432.04 $ 192,451.45 $ 193,390.41 DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 SUSPENSE Futm ~vARRANTS IN F/NOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineer 3-17 $ 6,879.00 -R- WJ\RRANT NO. i4996 ~ 14997 14998 14999 15000 "'f-)001 .._,,,; DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND W.ARRANTS IN FJ\VOR OF Boyle Engineerir.g~ Engr. Serv., Plan Check & Insp. $ AMOUNT 878.19 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Irvine Industrial Complex, Refund Insp. Deposit Irvine I~dustrial Complex, Reimb. Agreement DISTRICT3 NOS. 1 & 7 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineerj_n8, Engr. 7-6-1/7-6-2 Enterprise Printing Co., Plans & Specs. 7-6-1 Wallace Trade Bindery Co., Plans & Specs. 7-6-1 -C·- $ 878.19 $ 306.25 108,641.41 $ 108, 91n. 66 $ 16,980.00 60.80 65 .1~2 $ 17,106.22 RESOLUTION NO. 'll-l;L APPROVING PLANS ANTI SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NO. Pl-12-5 A RESOLUTION OF THE-BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DIS1°RICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,·5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY~ CJi.I..:FGfu.;~A., APPi\0-v l_l~J PLrl.~~3 fu~IJ SFECIFICATIGNS FOR MODIFICATION OF PARKING FACILITIES FOR ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, JOB NO. Pl-12-5 ****"*** The Boa.rd of Directors of County Sanitation· Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Districts' Engineers, for Modificatioq of Parking Facilities for Administration Building, Job No. Pl-12-5, a.re.hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisi_ons of the Health and Safety Code of the State of Califor~ia; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received untiJ_ 11:00 a.m., March 3, 1971, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. Section 5. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized to award contract for said Job No. Pl-12-5, on behalf of these Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting February 10, 1971. Agenda Item #15a -D-All Districts ·11 II 1 ! 2 I 31 4 I 511 611 7 r 81 91 I ·10 I RESOLUTION OF THE BOA~D OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY Of. OHAt~GE, CALIFORNl!,1 ACTil:W ALSO AS THE GOVERJ'aNG BOAim CF THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD co:\1TROL DISTRICT Januar.y 1.2, i971 On motion of Superv~sor Baker, duly seconded and carried, the following Resolution was ~dopted: WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County. of Orange ha.s certain responsibilities regarding the maintenance or enhancement of tl1e ocean environment along the County's shores; and WHEREAS, in the O:range County Flood Control Act the. Legislnturc 11 of the State of California h~s designated the Board of Supervisors -0£ 12 Orange County as the governing board for the Orange County Flood Control 1311 District; and ·14 I 20 21 22 23 I I I ?4 I -11 25 '1 26 27 2s I 29 I ~301' 31 I I 32 I CUP~ sd l • 1031-1 11 I, II li.IBEREAS, said District owns rights of ·way i1'.1 and along port.ions of the Santa Ano. River from the P_acific Ocean to-the Metropolit~n. 't·7c:"'.ter Dir:tr.:ict outlet t·~;o nr.d onc-hclf miles up,strema from Imr.-c::ci:J.l Higi1wny; and WHEREAS, County Sanitations Districts No. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, .. 7 oi.nd 11 of Orange County have previously entered into a waste ~a~er treatment and disposal agreement with ti~Le Riverside County Flood Control «.md W&ter Conservation District providing for accepting, trea~ing and disposing of indust~~:i.nl and other waste waters from the Santa Ana River draina0e area upRtream fro~n Pr-::!.do Reservoir; a.nd WrlEREAS, County ?anitation District No. 2 of Orange County h-3£ entered into a waste water intercepto~ capacity agreement with Riverside County Flood Control ar.<l WP.ter ConSE;T'V~tion District by ,,.,~·hich ~~.id district will provide additional capacity in its proposed Santa Ana River Interceptor Line into which said Flood Control District r.i.ay empty ind'u~;~· trial and other waste waters; and \anIEREAS, it has previously been contemplated tha.t said inter .. , ceptor line will be located in part within lands owned by the Orc:ff.lEe Rer.olution No. F71-2 PolL-;y D~cisi_~n -LocAti.on of s:~nitati.on TrlI71k Lines on Flcod Control Dir::trict Right- of-\:.o.y Agenda Item #15f E-1 All Districts 1 2 ~ 3 ,{ " '"I 5 6 7. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 _, > w ... !L ~ 7 O· 15 County Flood Control District; and WHEREAS, the disposal o.f vraste water into the Pacific Ocean by said Sanitation Districts of Orange County is regulated by the California RegS_onal vhd.:er ~uality Control Board, Sci.nta Ana }{egion; and WHEREAS, said Regional Bo1.1rd has prcv.iously adopted Resolution No. 59-5 (3-68) wh:i ch set forth certain beneficial ocean uses to b2 pro ... tectE~d, inc lu<ling, aeot:het:ic enj oymGnt, water contact sports, sport fish- ing, shell fish harvesting, propagation and sustenance of aquatic life and kelp propagation, and has provided a certain requirement relatable to the operation_ of said proposed nonreclaimable industrial waste line as folloHs: "B-9. The discharge shall not result in the presence of toxic materials in the water in amounts that are deleterious to fish, plant or aquat·lc life.': and w~ ~ U l!I 16 I:. > C> WHEREAS, said Regional Board Resolution No. 59-5 (3-68) does :l. ... z 0 z < :> a: eo 17 not specify.limits of the various toxic materials which may be disposed 18 of in the Pacific Ocean, nor does said Resolution provide any requirement 19 for surveillance, testing or detecting the presence of toxic materials· 20 as a result of the discharge into the ocean; 21 NOW,. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows: 22 1. Recognizing the desirability for segregating certain waste 23 in the Santa Ana Ri~er Basin above Prado Reservoir in order to prevent 24 its introduction into surface and groundwater supplies affecting water 25 users in San B~rnardino, Riverside and Orange Counties, it it the policy 26 cf the County 'of Oi·c.mge and the Orange County Flood Control District to 27 coop8rate j_n its accomplishment. ...._.,..28 2. This Board has local responsibilities in additi.on to 29 regio;nal respoL1s ibi. lities and is not necessarily in sympathy with the 30 tran~fer of the waste disposal problem from inland waters to coastal 31 lJaters unless adequate safeguards are cis sun~d. 32 I I I FI 031-1 I II .. ~..penda. Item #15f E-2. All Districts 1 2 ~ :1 5 6 7 8· 9 10 11 12 13 14 J> w I- IL 111 Z 0 z .... 15 w ~~ 16 IL > C ... !: z 0 .... c( :> 0: 17 eo 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ~ 29 30 31 32 F 1031 ·I I 3. It is the intention of this Board to authorize the use of the right of way of the Or~nge County Flood Control l)istrict along the Santa Ana River for the installation of a nonrecoverable waste pipeline, . . rroviderl the CaJ-i_f0:.~ni.C1 P.cglon;il F3.to: Q•J<.l:Lty Control ::::ie:_:d, S::.~::~:..:. .. "~!:-~:. Region, adopts standards .for the placing of waste ·waters in the Pac~fic Oceun which are at least as rigid as those adopted by Regional Water Quality Control Board No. 9, and provided further th.'.1t the ree;ul.e.tions of said Santa Ana Regional Board are const~ntly increased as research indicates it is feasible. 4. This Board does hereby petition the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board to adopt stricter regulations no less rigid than those adopted by Regional Water Qual~ty Control Board No. 9, and to control and monitor these regulAtions. 5. This Bo3rcl does hereby petition the Orange County Sanitu- tion District Boards to join ~ith this Bqard in the petition to the S .. :r~ta Anf?, 6. Members of our legislative delegation f~om Orange County be notified of this action and our intent to pursue m~y efforts to keep any vmter deposited in the Pacific Occa.n as clean as possible. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be sent to the Honorable Senators James E. Whctmorc and Dennis Carpenter, the Honorable Assemblymen Robert E. Badham, John V. Briggs, Robert H. Burke and Kenneth Cory, end to the follm·.1 ing: the State Water Resources Control B~ard, the California Regional Wa.ter Quality Control Bocird,. Santa Ana Region, the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County, the Board of Supervisors of San Bernardino County, the Board 6f Directors of the Countv S&Q.ita.~19P. Di~strict.§_ of Oran?-:e County, the Santa Ana Watershed Planning Agency, and the Southern California Coastal Water Rese.2rch Age.nc~ AYES: SUPERVISORS NOES: SUPERVISORS ABSENT: SUPERVISOH.S Agenda Item #15f DAVID L. BAYJ~R, WILLIA1'1 J. PHILLIPS, RALPH B. CLARK, RONALD H. CASPERS, AND R. W. BATTIN ~ NONE NONE E-3. All Districts 1 2 "-"' 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 J> w I- IL~ 7: 0 15 ~~ 16 I -w IL> l:l lJ. I-z 0 z <( :::>a: 17 80 18 19 20 21 ·22 23 24 25 26 n I ~28 29· 30 31 32 F 103 I· I I 11 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ' SS •. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, W. E. ST JOHN, County Cl~rk and ex-officio Clerk of the governing Board of the Orange County rlood Control Dlstr.ict, hereby certify that the ~hove and foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the said Board at a rev;Jer meeting thereof h~ld on the 12th day of Jnnuary, 1971, and passed by a unanimous vote of said Board. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my ha.nd and seal thic 12th day of January$ 1971. AQenda Item #15f E-h. W .. E. ST JOclN County ClE:·rk nn<l .cx--,of fie io Clerk of the Board of Supervicors of Orange County, California, acting also as the govern~ng Board of the Orange County Flood Control District . ~. . ·. . . "\ .,. . ' ... ,· .~': :' • "• • • • •' • • • • :: : • ' I•\' • ·. • t. '"" r, , " ~· .. : ' ~ . .,, ..... All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 71-13 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BCARDS OF DIRECTORS OF ·coUi\T'J1Y SANITATION DIS~iRICI'S NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,. AND 11, OF OHANGE 'COUNTY, CALIFO.RNIA, ESTABLI- SHING POLICY WITH RESPECT TO PROTECTION OF. BENEFICIAL USES OF OCEAN ·l·lATER AND REQUESTING THE .CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD r·o REVI~~·,j EAlSTIHG WA::/i1E iJlSCtlArtv~ REQUJ.R.ti~iVlliN'i1 S WHEBEAS, these Districts have entered into a· waste·water treat- ment and disposal agreement with the Riverside CoUi."1ty Flood.Control and Water Conservation District providing for accepting, treating and disposing of a maximum of 50 million gallons per day of wastewater from the Santa Ana River drainage area upstream of Prado Dam, ~·1hich wastewater, if disposed of in: said upstream drainage area, will cause a further degradation of the quality of flow of the Santa Ana River entering Orange County, and WTtlEREAS, said agreement also is j_n the best interests of Ora·ne;e County in that it effectively provides that the quality of such upstream wastewater discharges ·will be put under· the control of the Sanitation Districts, and WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors have evidenced and implemented their concern in the preservation of the ·water quality of the Pacific Ocean in the area of the Districts' wastewater discharge by means of (a) A continued planned program since 1956 of expansion and upgrading of wastewater treatment and disposal facilities. Said program has required the annual expenditure of approximately $4 million for the past several years and it is planned that a similar level of ~xpendi­ tures will continue indefiniteiy (b) ·The construction and equipping of. a ne·w· and modern labora.tory buj.lding at .a total estimated cost of $300,000. Said laboratory will be capable of performing all tests necessary to monitor effluent quality and, by .means of toxicity tests, to measure its effect, if any, on marine life in the discharge area. Agenda Item #15f F-1 All Districts ~ This laboratory will be staffed to perform any and all tests deemed ·necessary and it is planned that the scope of such tests and research will be above and beyond waste discharge requirements established by ·the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (c) A monitoring program of the quality of marine waters in ·thP. wastewater oischHr~P area and a comprehensive study of the existing and future marine life in said area. The scope of said monitoring.program and study is over and beyc;nd the existing requirew:mts of the Calj_fornia Regional lvater Quality Control Board ( d) Entering into a joint powers agreement with other Southern California waste dischargers to provide an intensive study of the effects of waste discha~ges on nearshore waters. Said study, now being conducted by the Southern Calif.ornia Coastal Water Research Project Authority at an expected total eventual cost of $1, 100, 0.00, is expected to provide valuable information to guide the Dis~ricts in future pla~1E'· for further upgrading of the quality of wastewaters discharged to the marine environment, and WHEREAS, the disposal of wastewater to the Pacific Ocean by the Sanitation Districts is under the statutory jurisdiction of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, which has adopted Resolution No. 59-5 (3-68) regulating the quality of the wastewater discharged by the D~stricts in order to protect the benef1cial.ocean uses established by said Regional Board, and WHEREAS, each Sanitation District has recently adopted a uniform connection.and use ordinance which provides for regulation of the quality of wastewater discharged to the Districts' faci_lities_, and WHEREAS, it is planned that said uniform ordinance will be further implemented in the near future by adoption of r~~es and regulations regulating the discharge of toxic materials, and WHEREAS,, said aforementioned agreer!'lent with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District provides that said District must meet the same :wastev·rn.ter quality standards as have Agenda. Item #15f F -2 All Districts been, or may b~, established for wastewater discharges within the Sanitation Districts. NOW, THJ!!REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Boards of Director8 of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,. 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, ·as follows: 1. That these Boards of Directors hereby reaffirm their fixed and continuing policy for taking all necessary measures including, but not limited to, those enumerated hereinabove, to protect the quality of marine waters in the Districts' wastewater discharge area as said quality may be affected by said discharge. 2. Recognizing that the protection of the quality of marine waters in the Districts' wastewater dischar8e area is a statutory responsibility of the California Regional v.ra.ter Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, said Board is hereby requested to review and to revise) if necessary, the Districts existing waste discharge requirements for the purpose of assisting the Districts in the further implementation ·or the hereinabove stated policy. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resolution be furnished to members of the legislative delegation from )range County, the Orange County Board of Supervisors, the State Water Resources Control Board, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, the Santa Ana ~fatershed Planning Agency and the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority. Agenda Item #15f F-3 All Districts CH1'\iWE OH.DEr\ ·--~----..__. __ _ G.O. NO. 1 D.ll '.PE: $_·_:_-:_0 __ -··-- ~-In accordance vd th contract 1)1:ovi sions, the follcnJing cl1ane;es in the ccd-::.:·.rci.ct c:iHJ/or c,')nt:rac~t ·~·1or1: &.:-:-c h.:'rcby rrnthr::-,::··~:-~/:c:1 c:.nd <..:.s. co:::pcnt;::.t::.c: therefor; the follow:tng add:L tions to or· dcducfions-from the contract price · a~e hereby approved . . IJue to delay in the evalirntion and dissemination of -information for proposed equipment,. an extension of contract t.ime is granted in the amount of .. ~ ..... : ......... ·. 8 calendar days . TOTAL "TIME EXTENSION ........... 8 calen·aar days _Summary of Contract 'fi_me: . . ·original Contr~ct Date Original Contract Time Original Completion D8te Time Extension This Change Order Revised Completion Date November 19, 1970 ()3 calendar da:,.i:s January 21, 1971 8 calendar days Jamiary 29, 1971 . . . ~oarc1 authorizat:i.on elate: February 10, 197J_ 'JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS Agenda Item #19 Orlginal Cont-ract Price $ _§_,_ 685-.!-3.5_ ______ _ Prev... _t\ uth .. Changes $ ~----!}212~---------·--·--·-- ~fhis Change (ADD) (DEDuc:r) $ ____ !2one· --------·- Amended Contract Price ~ 6 -' 685. 35 . 'i------·---------- Approved: COUNTY SANITATION .DISTRICTS of Orang·e Coun.ty,. CaJ5fo:cnia GENEPul\L EIJECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY -G-All Districts ·. n . . . . . ~lfi >~.~· .:.:.l . \, .. <\ PHOENIX • ARIZONA .. CAR.O LLD' .. ENS 8 .. 1\l.f;: ER S L:AFAYEJTE • SANTA ANA C.'1.LIFORNIA • EL PASO TEXAS J9HN A. CAROLLO, P. E. .. H. HARVEY HUNT, P. E. 3600 MT. OIABLO SOUL.EVAR_D • LAFAYETTE, CALIF'. 94549 HOWARD M. WAY. P. E. ROBERT G. WlLLl~MS, P. E .. DONALD R. PRf.ISl.ER, P. E. February 2 1 1971 AREA CODE: (415) 283-3895 Reply to: P. o. Box p28 Hunti!lgton. B:?,e.Gn California 92648 ~. Fred A. Harfer, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange' Coun~r P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Ocean Outfe.11 No. 2tJ Marir..e Section Attached you will find a letter from Peter Ki~· ..... it Sons' Company requesting one(l) day extention of ti.r!:.e for del~y due to hig~::velocity winds" ·We reco:rrn:end approval of one (1) day extention of tirr.e for s· January 1970 in accordance with Section 6-3 of the General .Provisions of the Specifications. The Contractor has requested a total of seventy-four( 74) da.ys extention of· tirr..e of which vre h...'1.v~ reco~ended approval of seventy-tvrn(72) days eztention throu~h JanuaI)~ 25, 19710 Very truiy yours, JOHN CAROLLO ENG I1~EP.S ,. ,- . . ;;rUa4~/!y;).;. Walter Ao Bishop Jr. . :f"' Resident Engineer WAB:wb Enclosu~e . ·, A:~enda I tern ~}20 -H-All Districts ' .. ~ . -~ ·~ETER .. KJEVVi_T SQ.NS' CO .. - CONTRACTORS £STA13L.ISH ED 1664 MAIN OFFICE: OMAHA 3), NEBR. !000 K!EWIT TL . .'.Zt AOORE:SS REPLY TO; Po O. Box 552 •' . John Carollo En~ibeera ?.Oo Eox 528 Huntin;!t-On Beach, Ca. 92648 Attni; Mr .. Walter A. Bishop .· · Hu.ntinzton Beach, Ca. 926Lt> Januery 8:; 1971 Resident En~ineer· Re~ Request for extension of tir::c. Gentlemen: In accordm cc with t.1.e general provisions of the specifications Section 6, para:raph 3, we respect.fully reouest a-ri extension: of the contract time for one (1) day because of weather delays (hie;h winds) on Tues:lay Januar-.r 5, 1971. The wi.nds caused the draggin~ of anchors ari.d work on mo sf· of the first shift and all of the second &"lift uas suspended. ·. Very Tru.ly. Yours, Pet er Kie-;d t Sons' Co .. cc: File (} t:l ~i)'\ _, /~-:C~~c/~ ~ John Ford ur. ./ v Project Supt, [,,/ Ag nda I ~·e,n1 1..1.,-t20 e . . v -I-A~1 Districts ~-CAE=lOLLC:l" PH9ENIX ARIZJf.JA • LAFAYETTE • JO,HN A. CAROLLO. P. E. H. HARVEY HUNT, P. E. HOWARO M. WAY. P. E. ROBERT G. WILLl~MS, P. E. DONALD R. PREISLER, P. E. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. 0. Box 812? Fountain Valley, California 92708 CALlfOKi~iA SANT·A ANA • EL PASO 3690 MT. O:ABLO BOULEVARD LAFAYETTE, CALIF. 94549 AREA CODE: (415) 283-3895 February 3, 1971 Subject: Interim Pump Station· and Additions to Bypa.ss Facilities ·at Plant No. -1 An. Interira Pump ·station is require;d·to. be OP.erational at the time the Sunflower Interceptor is operational (now scheduled for early in 1972). In order ·to have the required connections and pump station operational by the above elate, final design of the subject project should start immediately. We would like authorization to proceed with this design at the Districts 1 ear:!.iest convenience. We 'propose to accomplish the engineering for this project in acct.rdance with the terms of ou1· Contract dated July 1, 1970 and set forth in item M. Based on the scope of work set forth at the January 20-21 Design Conference, we estimate the cost for the engineering to be $10, 500. HHH:jk Agenda Item f/22 -·J-All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 71-14 APPROVING INTER-·DISTRICT BASIC CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT.LNG AG.P.EEMEN'r, RJ:!;: MAIN-DYER INTERCEPTOR A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 AND 7, GF Ob.A!{GE COUNT f, CALIFuRHIA, .A.?FR0VI1Ki AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF BASIC CON- STRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING AGREE- MENT RE: MAIN-DYER INTERCEP'I10R; CONTRACT NO. 1-12 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 7, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain ag1eement. entltled "Ba.slc Construction, Maintenance and Opera.t.ing Ag1eement, Cou~nty Sanitation Districts 1 and 7", dated February 10, 19'Tl relative to construction of the Ma.in-Dyer Interceptor; Contract No. 1-12, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That the Chairmen and Secretary of Districts Nos. 1 an~ 7 are.hereby authorized and directed to execute said agre2ment on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting February 10, 1971. Agenda. Item #26 -K-Districts 1 & 7 RESOLU TION NO . 71-21 AU THOR IZATI ON TO EXECUTE A TE MPO RARY WO RKIN G LIC ENS.b AG REEMENT wrrH A. J. GIS LER _, ET Afi""-: A RESOLUTION. OF THE BOARD OF DIREc°TORS OF CO UNT Y SA NIT ATIO N DISTRICTS NOS . 1 Al'YD 7 _, J P OR.ANGE COU NT Y_,. CALil"C RN IA , APP ROVING AND AUTHO RIZING.EXECUTION OF A TEMPORARY WORKING LICE NSE AG REEMEN T WI TH A. J . GISLER , ET AL * -JE--ll-* -)(--X--Ye -)(- The Board of Director& bf County Sanitation Dis trict s Nos . 1 and 7, of Orange County , Ca..Lifornia._, DO ES HEREBY RESOL VE , DETERMINE AND ORDER : Section J.. That the Ch a irman and the. Secretary of County Sa.ni ta.ti on District No . 7 be a.u thor:Lz e d and direct .~d to accept and si gn tha.t c e rtain Temporary Working License Ag reement vd th A. J . Gis l er _, e t al_, dat ed --------·-----·-·-' descri b e d. on Exhibit 11 A11 att ached hereto and ma.de a. pa.rt of t hi s resolution ; Sec tion 2 . That said license be acc epted and a.ppr·oved by t he Di stri ct up on the f iling of a du ly executed copy t hereof . in t h e office of the Secretary; and , Section 3 . That the Audi t or of the District be aut hor i z ed, upon r eceipt of a. d em and signe d by C. A. Nis son , General Counsel of .the District , to pay to A. J . Gisler and Mary A. Gisler the sum of $1 , 659 . 00 , fo r sa.id Tempo rary Wo rki ng License Agreement . PASSED A-ND ADOPTED at a: re gula.r mesting F ebruary 1 0 : 1971. _A genda. Item #27 -L- RESOLUTION.NO. 71-~2 AUTHORIZING l\.CC,EPTANCE OF EASEIY1'~NT A RESOLUTION' OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. l_Af'ID 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIF.ORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF· EASEMENT F~OM A.J. GISLER, ET AL * * * * * * * * *·* The ·Boards 6f Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 7, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated ~~~~~~~~~~- , wherein A.J. GISLER, ET AL grants to County Sanitation District No. 7, a perman'ent easement for sewer purposes situated in the County of Orange, State of California., in connection with construction of Sunf]..ower Interceptor, Contra.ct No. 7-6-1, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described in Exhibits "A" a.nd "B 1 ' attached hereto c.nd made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is accepted at a total cost of $14,694.oo, to the District; and, Section 4. That the. Audi tor of the District, upon receipt of a demand signed by C. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel of the District, be authorized to pay the sum of money as set forth herin for said easement; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to recrod said deed in the Official Records of Orange County, California.. p .ASSED AND .AnOPTED at a regular meeting February 10, 1971. Agenda Item #28 -M-Districts 1 & 7 ~/)) £·. . '!;? . I; i~ffe./,l.A, ~//~.1%1' (Y?<!:#lf/~Y ENGiN Ei:Rii\lG 0 EN~INEERS o ARCHITECTS 412 SOUTH LYON STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHONE C714> 547-4471 ADDRESS REPLY TO P.O. BOX 178 February 4, 1971 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. of Orange County · Post Office Box 81 /.7 Fountain Valley1 CA 92708 Attention Mr. Fred A~ Harper" General Manager Gentlemen: In response to Mr. Harper's request, we subm!t our proposal for perf~rmin0 engineering services for the preparation of pl ans and specifications for the ·Main-Dyer ln.terceptor as presented in the Engineer's Report for County Sanitation District No. 1 by Boyle Engineering, dated November 1969. The proposed facilHy will begin at Sunflower Avenue and Main Street where it is to be connected into the Sunflower Interceptor 1 extend northerly along Main Street to Dyer Road and continue easter! y along Dyer to Hal I a day Street. The trunk wil I consist of four distir :t reaches (Reaches 25, 26 1 27 and 28) varying in pipe size from 39 inches down to 15 inches. Total estimated cost of the proiect including construction 1 engineering; surveying, inspection, legal,administration and i~cidental costs is $522,000. · Construction of the interceptor will provide relief to the district 1s existing Dyer Road and Santa Ana trunks as well as relieving certain sewers in the city of Santa Ana which are currently flowing under surcharged conditions. Aisoi' a city of Santa Ana pumping station in the vicinity of MacArthur Boulevard and Main Street wil I be deacf.ivated because the new interceptor wil I provide a gravity connection for the pumping station tributary orea. The interceptor will serve a small area in District Noo 7 between Main Street and the Newport Freeway and south of Alton Avenue. Consequently / District No. 7 will have a 3 percent ownership in Reach 25 which extends from Main and Sunflower to' Main and MacArthur. The remaining reaches will be owned l 00 percent by District No. 1. We wil I perform the fol lowing professional ensineei-irig services for the Main-Dyer Interceptor: PROFESSIONAL a. Hold conferences with representatives o(the district, city of Santa Ana, County of Orange, property owners or leas·~es involved., other pub! ic agenci es 2 and others, to review and discuss all aspects of th~ project. · ·. · El'\:GINEERING AND A R C H. I T E C T U R A L SF..RVICES Agenda. Item #30 N-1 District l ·~ . . Board. of Directors County Sanitation District No. 1· · February 4, 1971 · Pc,ge Two b. c. d. e. f. g. i. i· .k. I. Make arrangements for and coordination of fie! d s~rxeys / soils investigations, and pavement coring. Prepare preliminary engineering studies and. design for review and cpprcval. · Prepare engineering data for regulatory permit applica- tions that may be required by the city of Santa Ana and th~ Orange County Road Department. Prepare detail pl ans and specifications •. Prepare estimates of quantities and co<:ts. Deliver the origina: tracir.gs of ~e pl aus and reprodiJcibf e · plates of the specifications for the district's use in preparing the necessary number of copies for record purposes, distri-:-· but ion to prospective bidders I etc r ' Prepare legal descriptions and Flats for right-of-way · acquisition as required for foci ity location and construction. Assist the district or its agent in sequring bids, tabulation and analysis of bid· results and in I etting of contract. Check shop and working drawings as may be submitted by the contractor. Review I aboratory reports on materials tests and inspections and correlate such reports with the intentions of the plans and specifications.· Furnish consultation and advice to the district or its agent during construction. m. Furnish periodic observations. of construction work and progress and provide appropriate reports to the distri Ct. n. Prepare record drawings (uas-constrl!cted 11 ) when construction work has been comp I eted and accepted by the district. Th is shall mean the original tracings of the plans will be modified, if necessary / because of deviations from the original work. When inspection is carried out by personnel not directly employed by the engineer, modifications to the original tracings will be based upon information supplied to the engine·cr by t0e district. The original tracings after being modified will become district property. BOYLE ENGINEERING Agenda. Item #30 N-2 . District 1 Board of Directors County Sanitation District Noo 1· February 4, 1971 . Page Three o. Observe initial operation of the project / witnessing perfor- mance tests os required by the specifications and reporting same to the district. P• Make a fina·f inspection and report of the completed proiect with a representative of the district or its agent. We propose to provide the services in items 11 a 11 through npn for.a basic fee of $23, 100. It is suggested that payment be monthly on a percentage com- pleted basis up to 90 percent at time of .delivery of plans a~d specifications. with 100 percent payment when the work is comp! ~ted and accepted by the district. · . . · . There will be field surveys required in order to p.repare the plans a"nd seecifi- cation5. These surveys wiI! include taking topography and culture witnin the proi ect I imi ts. We propose that al I' field surveys .necessary for design be per- formed on a per diem basis at our current per di~m rates, a copy of·Which is enC:osed. If any revisions are required by major changes in the scope of the project after the preliminary drawings are approved or after the final plans are completed, and such revisions are ordered by the district, we wil I perform StJch additional work at the current per diem rate. Vie propose that all outside services that are required and approved by the d!!;trict such as soils investigations, pavement coring, and plant inspection for quality control for materials used on project construction will be paid directly by the district upon presentation of a statement of such outside services with the engineer's certification. All additional engineering work and services such as constru.ction staking and construction inspection wil I be compensated at the per diem rates in effect at ac~ual time of work. Payment to be monthly as invoiced. If we are authorized to proceed with this work at the February 10th board meeting 1 pl ans and specifications can be ready for the board's approve! at the July 1971 board meeting. Respect~ully submitted, BOYLE ENGINEERING /) v 1" v-,/71,_ ,.;.~ii ~1-dt:.j._/f~ ,e /•N..J_d,; Conrod Hohener / Jr., C. • 10951 Principal Engineer pm Enc BOYLE ENGINEERING Agenda. Item #JO N-3 District 1 ,. .~ ''-"" B 0 Y I. E E I'-! G I N F F. P. i N G RATE SCHEDULE MAIN-DYER INTERCEPTOR·~ CONTRACT f'-10. 1·~12 Cl assifi co Hon ENGINEERil"-JG Principol Engineer Senior Engineer Assoc i af·e Engi n ecr hsisi·cmt Engineer DRAFTl 1-..JG Senior Draftsnwn Draftsman SURVEYlt~G Licer)sed Surveyor 3-Man Survey Porty 2-Man Survey Party CONSTRUCTIOl"-l IN.SPECTION Resident Engineer lnspecf·or MISCELLANEOUS .. Clerical Travel -. Auto Travel •· Other than auto Telephone Printing and blueprinting Sub feet· to revision January 1, 1972 BOYLE ENGINEEHING .b.8_'9nd a. I t_~n1 ;/~3Q N-L~ $29. 00 cm hour 25.50 an hour 22.50 an hour 19. 00 an hour $16~ 00 an hour· 13.50 an .~.our $19.50 an hour 48. 00 an hour 37 o 50 an hour $19.50 an hour ·12.00 an hour $ 8. 00 an hour 0.15 a mile Actual cost Actucil cost Cost+ 25% Di.strict 1 RESOLUTION. NO. 71-19-1 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF QUI~rCLAIM DEED A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTR1CT NO. 1, OF. ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA~ AUTHORIZING EX.ECUTlON OP QUrrcLAIM DEED *"*-****** The Boa.rd of Directors of County Sanitation ·District No. 1, of Orange County, Ca ifornia, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Quitclaim Deed for portions of existing District easement, dated , from County _Sani ta.tion District No. 1, to A~ tT. G ISLEH_, be a.pp roved; a:nd, Section 2. That the real property to be quitclaimed is more particularly shown on Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B 11 attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That the Chairman of the District be author,ized and directed to execute said Quitclaim Deed, quitclaiming the Distr.ict' s interest in the certain real property here:i..nabove described upon receipt by the District of Grant of Easement from A. J. GISLER, relative to construction in County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 7, Sunflower Interceptor Sewer, Contra.ct No. 7~6-1. PASSED J\ND ADOPTED at a regular meeting Feb-ruary 10, 197·1. Agend_a~ Item #31 -0-District 1 .~ RESOLUTION NO. 71-20-1 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM A.J. GISLER *******-K~ The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County~ California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement, dated , wherein A. J. GISLER ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ grant to County Sani tB.tion District No. 1, a permanent easement for sewer purposes through certain real property si.tua.tedin the County of Orange, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described on Exhibit "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a. pa.rt of this resolution; a.nd, Section 3. That said Grant of Ease.me11t is accep ced a.t no cost to the District; and, Section 4. That tne Secretary of the Boa.rd of Directors be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California.. PASSED AND ADOPTED a.t a regular meeting February 10, 1971. Agenda. Item #32 -P-· District 1 '\ ·.....- RESOLUTION NO. 71-15~5 APPROVING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANN~X~rION NO. 4) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DI~EC.TORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5·, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, OR.DERING ANNEXATION OF TKrtRI'TORY TO THE DISTRICT 11 PhOPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 4 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5" . . -l<-****-X·-l<-* The Board of Directors of County Sa.nlta.tion District No. 5, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been ma.de to the Local Agency Forma.tj_on Cornmi s sion for a:nnexa.tj_on of tei-:-:rj_ tory to County Sani.tation Dj_strict No. 5, by mea.ns 0f a. petition filed with said Commission by The Irvine Company, sole owner of the property; and, Section 2o That the designation assigned by said Commission· to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Proposed Annexation No. 4 to C~mnty Sanitation Di_strict No. 5") the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exriibit "A" and shown on Exhibit 11 B" attached hereto and by reference ma.de a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and, Section 4. That the reason for ·annexing said territory is for installation of a sewera.g.e syste~ in said territory; and, Section 5. That annexation fees in the amount of $582.80 ($310.00 per acre) have been postponed f6r two years during which an equivalent area. will be withdrawn ·from the District ·"-""' by The Irvine Company; and, Section 60 That, as authorized by ·resolution of the Local Agency Forma.tj_on Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District Agenda. Item #36 Q-1 District 5 't Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of 'the Goverrunent ciode, Section 56261, the terr~tory hereiribefore referred to and ·describe~ h'ereinabove, be and :it is hereby ordered annexed to ~ County.Sanitation District No. 5. PASSED A...l\TD ADOPTED at a regular meeting February 10; 197l. Agenda. Item #36 Q-2 ·District 5 .I COUN 1l1Y S:\~H'l'lVI1lO?f DISI1HIC'l1 S OF OHAlrGE COUN'I'Y P. O. BOX 51'?5 ·-l08L~h Ellis Avenue 'Fountain V£lJley > C~liforrdQ 92'/08 CHAHGE ORDEH Amou.rit of this chane;e o~"der (.!\DD) ·(DEDUCT)·. $ -.o------ In accotdance with contract provisions, the following chan3es in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor.ts letters dated· l~ December 7~, 4 January 71 nnd 14 January 71. The contractor is hereby granted a time extension due to inclement weather during the following· time periods: SUMMARY:· 28 November 70 through 11 December 70... 11+ days 13 December 70 through 24 December TO ... 12 days 11 Janua1jT 71 thr•ough lj January ( l. . . . . 3 days TOTAL ...... 29 days Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension from C.0.#1 ~1·rnp EXtPns~on ~~nm C 0 ~3 •-...... ~ -.· -... - - -... .i.. -..,,,,/ ~ 1-. • 8 I/ Revised Completion Dat~ / 28 May 70 210 days 24 December 70 33 calendar days 29 co.lsnda:i."' days 25 February 71 =--~-----·-=---======::::~ Original Contract Price Prev.. Au th. Changes C. 0 .#1 . Add This Change (ADD)(DEDUCT) Amended Contract Price =:=;.;.::::::;;::;::::=-==========: ___ _ Board authorization date: Approved: ___ ., _______ _ $ 330 1 000. Q_O __ $_ 4,Q88. 46 I $ -0- February 10, 1971 COUNTY SANITATION .DISTRICTS of Orange County> C~lifornia · BOYLE ENGINEERING Agenda. Item #50 -R~- By ____ . /s/ Paul G ·-~~'or,·m_:_ ______ ··-· _. Chief Enr;ineei' M.ERCO CONSrrRUCTION ENGINEERS D.istrict 3 COUN 1i'Y S!\N~C'l'NJ.1ION DISrrl\IC~L1S OF OR1\tTGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 51'(5 ·· 108l1.i!-Ellis Avenue Fountain V0..lJey; Cc~lifor!11n 92'{08 CHANGg ORD.!~R --~---~~---··-C. 0. NO • __ ._......2....._ ___ _ Amount of thj_s change order (ADD) (DEDUcrr) $ -·0--- In accordance w:i.th cortract provis:i.ons) the fol lo·oing changes j 1.'1 the · contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor) the following additio11s to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contr·actor: s letter dated 22 J'anuary '(l and Englneer's Diary. The contractor is hereby granted an extension of time for the period which t~City of Long Beach Gas Department was working in the intersection of Westminster & Bolsa Chica. This work was done to facilitate the placing of the force main.through this intersection. 7 Decembe::c 70 L.hrou.gh 16 December ... (0". • • • • • • • • 10 days The conl.ractor is hereby granted an extension of time due to inclement weather during the following time periods: . 28 "November 70 through 6" December 70.... . . . . . 9 days 17 December. 'lO through 24 December 70.:...... 8 days 21· January 71 through 13 January 70. . . . . . . . . .. 3 days · Total time for weather ..... 20 days Total time extension ....... 30 days SUMMARY: .Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Revised Completion Date 25 June 70 210 ~alendar days 20 January 71 19 February.71 Original Contract Price $ 388 2 449 !2..Q_ Prev. Auth. Changes $ none . This Change (ADD)(DEDUCT) $ ·none Amended Contract Price t._388' 449_~g9_ -.. ·--=·-===== ======-=-;;::;;-===-·-;;.;::=-=;:;o,;;;"-.:;::::-'=---·-- 9oard authorization date: ~ Fe?ruary 10, 1971 BOYLE ENGINEERIHG Agenda. Item #51 -S- Approyed: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of .Orange County) California By ___ . /s/ Paul G. Bro~·m By --- District 3 COUI'f11 Y S1\IH'TA 1rIOi'I DISjrn1crrs Oli' ORAHGS COUi\TY P. O. BOX 5175 -10844 ElliG Avenue Fountain \![lllcy > Cc-i .. liforr!:!.a 92'('08 CHi\NW~ ORDER ---·--------C. 0. NO. ------------ I CON 11'Rl\C'I10H : __ .JS: .. ~--~-·--·Q . .t __ comp2..nY -DNCE: Febru8r.x_l.Q_, __ 19.IJ __ _ Westside Interceptor Facilitico, . . J"OB: _1/~_s tm.1.ns ter ·Avenue ..I.n..ter9ep..t_g_:r: __ S§.)i~ . .I:, Con_tra_c_LNQ-L-~( Revis~d_)__ __ Amount of this change order (IDm) (DEDUCT) $ 564. 00 In acco-rcl.Gnce ,.d.th contract provlsions, the followin~ ch:.ngc:s i~ t:1e contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions fiom the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Instruction from the Midway City. Sanitary·District to Contractor 8 December 70. Midway C:j_ty Sanitary District letter to the District dated 28 Janu~ry 71. DEDUCT 'I'he contractor was instructed by representatives of the Midway City San:t tary Distr·ict to eliminate tl).e 1~8 11 man- hole called for in the plans and specification and described in Item 12 of this contract. DEDUCT TOTAL DEDUCT Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Chan~es This Change ()d;nD)(DEDUCT) Amended Contract Price ~-------·---- Approved: 56lL 00 564.oo $_751_~'ll_O. 00_ $ ____ _:_Q:_ __ _ I $ 564. 00 $ _ _].§.2, ,.ro6. oo 3oard authorization date: ~ · February 10, 1971 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRIC~C1S of Orange County, California · BOYLE ENGINEERING Agenda. Item #52 By __ ~-/~/ Paul_G. K. E. C. COMPANY Brm·m Chief -------Engineer District 3 ~ COUN'rY s1urrri\TIO~f DIS'l'HIC'l1 S OF 0&'1.I·IGF~ COUi'l'l'Y P. 0. BOX 5175 -l0844·Ellis Avenue Fou~tain Valley, Cnlifo~ni~ 92708 CHANGE ORDER ----. C. 0. NO. 4 . __ ......._ ____ _ CON 1l1RACTOH :~._R .. __ c__~_C_omplillY-------~----.. -·-c-~-D/\'l1 E :_Februa-.rL.d-{L_ 1971 Westsids IRterceptor FRcilitiei, j"OB: Westmj__n.ster_·Avenu_e · InterQ.~Qfil>r SewerJ Contract 3-14 .CB~:b_se_d_-....._) _____ _ Amount of this change o.rder (:>1_Ilil) ·(DEDUCT)·. · $ 31, 274. 50 In accordA.ncc "t·1 ith cont:r;:;ct provlsions) ·the :follo\·lir:g chengcs in ti1c contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation ·therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ADD Item No. Unit -- 7 V.F. 8 V.F. DEDUCrr l L.F. 3 L.F. 15 Each 16 Each ADJUSTrliENri' OP ENGINE.ER 1 S 0UAN'J~Ir:UES ·------·---~------- Change From .58 26 3432 615 3· 5 Est'd. Quant. To 63 5 @$180./v.F. 28 2 @$200./v.F. Total Add .. 3L~31 1 @t124.50/L.F. -0-. 615 @~50./L.F. -0-3 @tl50./Ea. -o-5 @ 250./Ea. 'i"'Otal Deduct ·Totai Change Order Deduct Original Contract Price Prev .. Auth .. Changes-Dedu9tt C.O.tt3 This Change (X~~)(DEDUCT) Amended Contract Price $ 900.00 400.00 ----,.--.. ... $ 1)300.00_ $ 124.50 30,750.00 450.00 1,250.00 '. $ 32,574.50 $ 31, 271+. 50 $_790 ,:?70_. 00 - $ 564.oo $ 31, 27 L~. 50 $_ 758_,431.50 Beard authorization date: ~ Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California · FebrJary 10, i971 BOYLE ENGINEERING K. E. C. COf.1PANY Agenda. Item #53 -U-District 3 ·, · RESOLUTION NO. 71-16-3 h_g_CEPTING cowrRACT NO. 3-1L1. AS "COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-14 AS COMPLETE . -1(--1(--1(-* -1(-* . -x- The Boa.rd of Directors of County Sanita.t~on District No. 3, of Orange County, Ca,lifornia., DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMII\TE AND ORDER: Section 1. Tha.t the contractor, K. E. C. Comp_any, has completed the construction in accordance with the tenns of the contra.ct for the Westside Interceptor Fa.cilj_ties, Westmj_nster Avenue J::ntc:rceptor Sewer, Contra.ct i'~o. 3-14, on the 28th da.y· of January, 1971; and, Section 2. That by letter, District's engineers have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. Tha.t the Ch5.ef Engineer of the District ha.s concurred·in said engineers' recommendation, which said recom- mendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the Westside Interceptor Facilities, Westipinster Avenue Interceptor Sewer, is hereb~ accepted as completed in-accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 15th da .. y of July, 1970; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a. Notice of Completion therefor. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting February 10, 1971. ././-4 Agenda. Item rr5 -V-District 3 RESOLUTION NO. 71-17-3 APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR ONE, 10 11 VERT~CAL SEWAGE PUMP, CONTRACT NO. 3-12-A A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUN'TY SANITATION DISTRiCT1 iW. 3, OP ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SP.ECIFICATIONS FOR ONE, 10 11 VERTICAL SEWAGE PUMP, CONTRACT NO. 3-12-A **-***-X-7<·* The Board of Directors of County Sanitatiori District No. 3, of Orange County, California DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed specifications this day submi tt"ed to the Boa.rd of Directors by Districts' Engineers, for ONE, 10 11 VERTICAL SEWAGE PUMP, CONTRACT NO. 3-12-A, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise· for bids for said ec1"'--1ipment pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety.Code of tne State of California.; and, Section 3. That the Secretary of the Boa.rd and the District's Engineers be authorized to open said bids m behalf of the Board of Directors; and, Section 4. That said bids will be received until 11;00 a.m. February 26, 1971, at which time said bids will be publicly opened a'nd re.ad; and, Section 5. That the General :nanager be a.uthorized to issue a purchase order to lowest responsible .bidder:-for an amount not to exceed $3,200, plus tax and fr8ight. PASSED AND ADOPTED a.t a. regular meeting held February 10, 197L Agenda. Item #57 -W-District 3 ·JOHN W. BRYANT . CHIEF ENGINEER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND \!'/ATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502 20 January 1971 Board of Directors County Sanitation Districts .of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 1S9!S MARKl:T STr:tF.T P.O. FlOX 1033 TELEPHONE (714) 78.7-2015 • Gentlemen: Re: Extensio~ of time for "Financing By Riverside District 11 -Nonreclaimable . Waste Project Due to.local circumstances beyond control of this District, the 1 December 1970 deadline for project funding authoriza- tion under our agreements with your Sanitation Districts could not be met. It is hereby respectfully requested that you grant an extension of time to 15 May 1971 for us to obtain project. financing authorization. ~hank you for considering this matter and the excellent cooperation of your Board and staff throughout the formulation of this basin-wide project. d It ::1:_,·,l..61 Ap;en a_ . · er:i -- -. Very truly yours, _,/-) ~ _j /('/ <~ /' 0~ .. ~--i-:--v( C-, . 't :/ ' JOHN W. BRYANT Chief Engineer -X--District 2 RESOLUTION NO. 71-18_-2 APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENT rro WASTE WATER INTERCEPTOR CAPACITY·AGREEMENT WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUN'rY SANITATION DI3TRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SECOND Al.~ENDMENT TO WASTE WATER INTERCEPTOR CAPACITY AGREEMENT WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CON- SERVATION DISTRICT *~-*-~*** The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETER.J.VIINE AND ORDER: S~ction 1. That the certain Second Amendment to Waste Water Interceptor Capacity Agreement with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, providing an extension of time to May 15, 1971, for nFinancing by Riverside District", is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman a.nd the Sec:retary of the· District be authorized and directed to execute said a'M.endment on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting February 10, 1971. k\§enda. Item =//:61 -Y-. District 2 RESOLUTION NO. '(1-19-2 · FEDERAL AND STATE G.RANTS -SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR . (From Treatm~nt .t'lant No. 1 to Katella. Avenue) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY· SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION AND FILING OP DOCUMENTS tmCESSARY FOH FEDBRAL GRANT UNDER 33 use, 466 ET SEQ AND STATE GRANT UNDER CLEAN WATER BOND LAW·OF 1970 *****·>E-7<-* The Board of Directors of County Ganita.tion Distrie;t No. 2, of Orange County, California. DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT: Section 1. An a.ct of Congress known a.s the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as ~mended (33 USC,· 466 et seq.) provides for Federal grants for con0truct.ion of sewage treatment works. Section 2. The State Clean Water Bond Law of 1970 authorizes the State Water Resources Control Boa.rd to enter into contracts with public agencies for State grants for construction of sewage treatment works in the amount of twenty-five percent (25%) of the·· estimated ~ligible total pro~ect cost. Section 3. County Sanitation District ~o. 2, of Orange County, is a separate and. distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Pa.rt 3, Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California., for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a. major trun~ sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other locai collection se~ering agencies. Section 4. The Board of Directors has heretofore entered into an agreement with the Riverside ~ouhty Flood Control and Water Conservation District, whereby the two said Districts will ...._,. share in the cost of the construction of cer·ta.in joint interceptor facilities as said facilities and cost shares a.re .set forth in said agreement. Sa.id a.greement also provides tha.t this District -will construct and operate said facilities and thereby. is deemed to be the "Central Agency'' for 2.a.id g.rant applications as Agenda. Item #63 Z-1 District 2 set forth in Title 23 of the Ca~ifornia Administrative Code. Section 5. By means of Resolution· No. of the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Co'nservation District and this resolution, authorization is· granted for the filing of applications for grants l-~nder said !\.ct of Cong1·ess a.w1 said Clean Water Bond Law of 1970 for the construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor ~Ln the reach between Treatment Plant No. 1 of the County Sanitation Districts, of Ora..rige County, and Kat ell a Avenue. Section 6. The General Manager is hereby authorized to prepare, sign and submit, for County Sanitation District No. 2, a.11 documents necessary to apply for and accept construction grants under said Act of Contress and said Clean. Water Bond Law of 1970 for a joint project generally described as: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEprl'O}( (From Treatment Plant No. 1 to.Katella Avenue) ~da. Item #63 Z-2 District 2 SIDNEY L. LOWRY PRESIDENT LOWRY ~ND ASSOCJATES CIVIL ENGINEERS ASSOCIATES 121 EAST. WASHINGTON AVENUE BANTA ANA, CAL.IFORNIA g2,701 HARRY C. BILLINGS, VICE PRES. Telephone 541-5301 Area Code 714 January 25, 1971 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California · Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Subject: Gentlemen: Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager Proposal for Engineering Services - Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer DONALD J. MARTINSON. VICE PRES. In accordance with Mr. Harper's request, we are pleased to submit this proposal for funishing engineering .services for the preparation of plans and specifications for the Santa Ana River Intercep~or Sewer from Plant 1 to Katella.Avenue. · This project has been under study for several years and is fully described in the June 1969 report entitled, "Feasibility Report for Joint Outfall Sewer Project with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District." The project is an important element in the District's Master Plan of trunk sewers because it will intercept and divert flows away from the District's existing Newhope Placentia Trunk, which is rapidly reaching its design capacity. Sufficient ~apacity will be provided in the project for the District in accordance with the sewage flows calculated in our ~aster Plan studies for the projected land use conditions beyond the year 2000. In addition, a capacity of 50 mgd will be provided for Riverside County in accordance with the outstanding agreements~ The project as planned consists of approxirnateJy 32,200 feet of 84- inch and 14,500 feet of 72-inch diameter sewe~, extending £rom Plant 1 to Katella Avenue where it will intercept the existing Olive Sub-Tr~nk sewer. 11r4 Agenda. Item ffO AA-1 District 2 .· January 25, 1971 Board of Directors County Sanitation ·District No. 2 of Orange County, California Page --2- : The total estimated cost of the project is $8,100,000. Riverside County's share of this portion of the project ~s approximately $3,000,000. Their participation is dependent upon their ability to follow through with a successful bond issue or some other means of financing by May 15, 1971. The Plans and Specifications ~nd other documents will be prepared in a manner to meet the requirements of the State Water Resources c~ntrol Beare and the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration for possible State and Federal grants that may amount to 80 percent of the proj~ct cost (ex- clusive of any right of way costs). . .. ·.· We will perform the following professional engineering services for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer in accordance with the following: (1) Hold conferences with District's staff, other interested agencies, and private property owners who may be involved in the project. (2) Assist in the preparation of the documents and repor~s for federal arid state grants. (3) Make arrangements for and coordination of field surveys, soils in- vestigations, and related work. (4) Prepare preliminary design studies for review and approval • . (5) Assist in obtaining permits from the Orange County Flood Control District, the California State Division of Highways, and other affected agencies. (6) Prepare construction plans and specifications. (7) Prepare estimates of quantities and cost estimates. (8) Deliver the original plans and specifications to the District for reproduction by the District. (9) Prepare legal descriptions and maps for right of way acquisition as required. (10) Work with appraiser and attorney in right 'of way matters. A£J:enda. Item #64 PtA-2 District 2 ..- ""-" January 25, 1971 Board of ~irectors County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California Page -3- (11) Assist the District in securing and tabulating bids, analyzing bid results, and awarding contract. (12) Check shop and working drawings as may be submitted by the con- tractor. (13) Furnish consultation and advice to the District during construction. (14) Make a final inspection and prepare a report on the completed pro- ject. .. . (15) Prepare "As built" drawings of the completed work and file the original drawings with the District. Our firm has already accomplished some of the above work in the pre- liminary design phase as authorized by the Board on July 8, 1970. This wo~k has been paid for on a monthly basis and is to be credited against the engineering fee for the project. It is planned to divide this unit of the Santa Ana River Inter- ceptor Sewer into three contracts. We propose to provide the services in Items 1 through 15 for each of the contracts as followsi Contract Estimated Cost 2-14-1 Plant 1 to $2,600,000 Edinger Ave. 2-14-2 Edinger Ave. to 2,300,000 17th Street 2-14-3 17th St. to 3,200,000 Katella Ave. Totals 8,100,000 Engineering Fee $ 92,850 80,380 . 110,190 283,420 Less Previous Billing $ 7,300 7,300 7,300 21,900 (As of Net Fee $ 85,550 73,080 102,890 261,520 •. Jan 15, 1971) ~ . J0enda. Item #64 AA-3 District 2 •• l .. January 25, 1971 Boar<l of Directors County Sanitation.District No. 2 of Orange County, California Page -4- We propose that all outside services as approved by· the District such as title work, soils investigations, pavement coring, plant inspection for quality control of materials, and other related work will be paid directly by the District with the engineer's certification. · In r~gard to fjeld surveying, any additional work needed for pla~ fr~­ paration and construction staking, we propose to accomplish at the follow- ing rates: Three man survey party---$44.00 per hour Two man survey party---$37.00 per hour. In. the event the District requires daily inspection services, we pro- pose to provide this service upon written request by the District, at an hourly rate of $10.00. We s~ggest that payment for engineering services be made monthly based on the percentage of the work completed, up to 90 percent at the tine of delivery of the plans anJ. specifications, and 100 percent payment ·when the project is completed and accepted by the District. Payment for surveying and inspection services to be monthly as invoiced. Mr. Martinson will be assigned as Project Manager for the project and.a sufficient number of qualified ·engineering personnel will be working on the project to have the specifications for the three contracts ready by May 10, 1971. and the.plans for the three contracts ready by May 15, 1971. DJM/jh Agenda. Item #6L~ Very truly yours, Lowry and Associates Sidney L.~ Lowry . ~~ AA-4 ·---ii-~ .. District 2 SIDNEY L. LOWRY PRESIDENT ·.· LO\:'VRY AND ASSOCIATl'::S· CIVIL. ENGINEERS ASSOCIATES 121 EAST. WASHINGTON AVENUE SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA g2701 HARRY C. BILLINGS. VICE PRES. Telephone 541-5301 Area Code 714 February 2, 1971 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fou~tain Valley, California Attention: Mr. Paul Brown, Chief Engineer Dear Mr. Brown: DONALD J. MARTINSON. VICE PRES. We have reviewed the responses from the soils engineering firms that were requested to submit proposals fo~ a soil investigation re- port for tµe proposed Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer Project from Ellis Avenue to Katella Avenue . . In our opinion all of the firms are qualified to do t~1e work. However, Geolabs-California, Inc. has been working with us by offering consultation and advice durin5 the preliminary design stag~ of the project. It is therefore recommended that a proposal be requested from that firm with the understanding that the cost.shall not exceed $15,000. DJM/jh .A-genda Item f,!·65 Very truly yours, Lowry and Associates -~,ef/ p~zl:2,,:~4---. Donald J. Martinsor- BB-1 District 2 I . f G'E O'LP, B-S-~"'CA LTF~O'RN i'A :, '1 ~C~_-·~,~Q~~~~~g~oEG~y~fN~~c·· .. ..,..,.,..,.... ~ • ... ;. '"-~ · .. ,. -:~~ -o:. ,.. _ ,,__._:_. -·--~---• ....;;·:~ -·-"...,....;,, __ • ...,.. ,. ___ ,_--~..._ ... .::__:,,. .,:: .. ,,. . .;_~.~~ ....... -·~ .... 1 ~.;;..,,::.»0 ;.;.:,,,. :,;.....:_..-••• 1 .... -~;;.__.;,......._ ~-:r• •. ,>:. • .._,;o.!' .• ' •. , .• .,. ... •-·-~;·,~ .. ~,..,..,,~-· .... -a.£--.·---....,..•..:~··---.. ~.....,...,.: .. · .. ·-~ . .:._ .... 2168 South Hathaway St. e P.O. Box 2426 .. Santa Ana, California 92707 • (714) 546~6602 February 1, 1971 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. 0 ; Box 81 27 Fountain Valley, California 92780 . . Attention: Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manuger Subject: Request for Proposal -Soil Investigation Santa f.na River Interceptor Sewer, Ellis Avenue to Kate Ila· Avenue, Orange County, California Gentlemen: In accordance with your letter request dated January 2·1, 1971, we would like to express our interest in investigating the soils conditions pertinent to the subject project. After advice and discussions with Mr. Don Martinson of Lowry Engineering-Science, we have inadvertently stated an oral esti- mate of a maximum fee for the approximate scope of work outlined. We realize that certain problems have developed with regard to submitting a proposal, since there has been a wquest for proposals from several other soils engineering firms. The ethical considerations of pr·ofessional societies to which we belong precludes competitive bidding. These consi9erations have been developed to promote the best interests of the client, and not to provide financial benefit to the engineer. · Under present circumstances we cannot submit a competitive bid; however, for purpo$es of es ti mating the prol:x:t bl e costs of the required soi I e ng i nee ring services,· we have found the fees charged in comparable past projects has ranged from 100 to 500 dollars per boring. The variance in fee is largely the result of required drilling spacing and deRths, necessary somplir.g, laboratory testing, and complexity of the foundation materials and engi- neering struct:.Jre for which the investigation is conducted. . . After considerable evaluation we find that the code of ethics of the American Society of Civil Engineers precludes our submission of a proposal which may be interpreted as competitive bidding for professional services. \. OFFICES: VAN NUYS. CALIFORNIA• SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA• LAS VEGAS, NEVADA • 8ELLEVt;i::, WASHINCTOl'I • TACOMA, WASH_INGTON • HONOLULU, HAWA!l Agenda. Item #65 BB-2 District 2 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County February 1, 1971 poge two The Geofabs-California, Inc. organization of Santa Ana, California is staffed with 22 personnel including 5 registered engineers and 2 engineering ge.ologists. If we· rr.ay further negotb~e for the· subject projact, ·in accvrdance with ASCE Manual 45, 11 A Guide for The Engagement of Engineering Services", we will be pleased to provide a detailed proposal for performing the required scope of services. Should you have any further questions regarding this letter or our availability please do not hesitate to contact me at our ~onto ~na offices (546-6602). Very truly yours, ~BS-CALIFORNIA, ~NC. Gerald~~~ Chief Engineering Geologist GAN/wp cc: Lowry Engineering-Science Q GE OLAES. INC. Agenda. Item #65 BB-3 District 2 MOORE & TAB'ER CONSULTING ENGIN.EERS AND GEOLOGISTS 4530 EAST LA P~LMA AVENUE • ANAHEIM, CALIF"ORNIA 92806 • (714) 524-3350 OTHCR 0,.F'ICCS: WOOOLANO HILLS WEST SACRAMENTO SANTA ROSA Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California· 92708 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER January 28, 1971 Your letter of January 21 requesting our proposal for a soil inves- tigation of the subject project is acknowledged. We would like to work with you on this project and co~ld provide the cost information you desire if our finn is selected to do the work. Our qualifications have recently been presented in connection with the Inter-Plant Influent Interceptor. A submission of tost figures at this time would not conform with the ethical practices of the Ameri:an Society of Civil Engineers. If you would like to discuss our qualifications in more detail or a founda- tion investigation program for this project, please contact us. We appreciate your interest in our firm. vc cc Lowry and Associates Attention Mr. Don J. Martinson Sincerely, MOORE & TABER 1· \~ . .._{:--:-,--1_1 _/{. _, -·' • -·.'._· ---l--~ -- R. F. Moore President Agenda. Item #65 BB-4 District 2 MAI!" OFFICE IG315°M EAST EDINGER STREET, SANTA ANA,CALiFORNIA 92705 • (714) 543·3411 1138 WILSHIRE BLVD., 0 LOS ANGELES 90017 • 213 • 481·3990 540 EASTTHOMPSON BLVD., VENTURA·, CALIFORNIA 93001 94°901 FARRIN 0 GTON HIGHWAY, WAIPAH,U, HAWAII 96797 MAURSETH • HOWE·· lOC~WOOD & ASS.OCIATES RAYO. MAURSETH, C.E. JOHN B. HOWE, C.E. ROBERT D. COUSINEAU CHARLES S. HOWE JR., C.E. R. BRUCE LOCKWOOD, OEOL .. P.E, <;::ounty Sanitation Districts of Orange County, (:alifornia· P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 A CORPORATION Con.suiting Foundation Engineers and Geologist.s Santa Ana, California JaJ?.uary 2 7, 1971 Attention: Mr. Fred A. Harper, Gene.ral Manager ( 005) 643-3438 (808) 871-337 Subject: Request for Proposal -Soil Investigation Santa' Ana .~iver Inter- ceptor Sewer, Ellis Avenu.e to Katella Avenue Gentlemen: We wish to acknowledge your letter of January 21, 1971 with attached investigation specifications and plans, requesting a soils investigation for the above trunk sewer project. Your letter requested that we furnish cost information for performing this investigation. From your letter and recent conversations with Lowry and Associates, we understand that you have requested priced proposals from other consult- ing engineers. Since it is contrary to the code of ethics for professional engineering firms to knowingly furnish competitive bids for engineering ser - vices, we must decline to submit a proposal stating costs for this project. Your attention is invited .to Manual 45, uA Guide for the Engagement of Engineering Servicesn which describes a recommended procec:Iure in the ne- gotiation of engineering contracts. For purposes of de.termining the probable cost of these engineering services, reference may be made to the fees charged in comparable pa.st work such as· the (1) Interplant Influent Interceptor Line, and {2) several Los Angeles County Flood Control District Bond Issue Storm .Drain Projects, engaged in by this offi_c.e~~ <F:~"' If our organization is selected to proceed with further negotiations as described or referenced above and have so informed the other firms, we BRANCH OFFICE MANAGERS ALBERT BACA • SANTA ANA RICHARD P. COUSINEAU, GEOL. •VENTURA RICHARD A. MARTIN, P.E. -HONOLULU Agenda. Item #65 STAFF ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS ARA MELKONIAN. RICHARD £-WEI.HU WILLIAM R. MUNSON, JR .• RAY EASTMAN KENNETH H. KOFORD. DOUGLAS C. SHUMWAY BB-5 CONSULTANTS K. BERT HIRASHIMA,P.E. ·HAWAII· AWTAR SINGH. PH.O .. C.E. District 2 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County -2 would be pleased to provide a price proposal.for perfor.ming the soils in- vestigation outlined. Should you have any further questions regarding this letter or our avail- ability, please do not hesitate to contact us. JBH/jk cc: Lowry and Associates Agenda. Item /J65 BB-6 Very truly yours, MAURSETH-HOWE -LOCKWOOD & ASSOCIATES Howe, V.ic e. President 9905 District 2 . ~ . -· ~ . . .. CONSULTING FOUNDATION. ENGINEERS tz:::;T I 711 NORTH ALVARADO STREET 0 LOS ~NG.ELES, CALIFORNIA 90026 0 TELEPHONE 386·3920 LEROY CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES January 26, 1971 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Fred A. Harper Genera I Manager Gentlemen: · Request for Proposal -Soil Investigation Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer Ellis Avenue to Katella Avenue Orange County, California This is in response to your letter of January, 21 requesting our proposal for investigating the soil conditions in connection with the subject project. While we would be pleased to work with you on this project, we understand that you have made similar requests of other soils engineering firms in the area. In view of this, we must decline to submit a proposal on a price basis. The services requested are professional and should be con.tracted for on a negotiated basis. We firmly believe that competitive bidding for professional ser-· vices is unethical, and we are sure that other reputable soi Is engineering firms in this area are of the same conviction. These ethical considerations have been formu- lated by professional societies to which we belong and were developed to promote the best interest of the Client, rather than to secure a financial position for the En- gineer. In fact, the professional societies to which we belong feel so strongly on the matter t~at a member who violates the practice is subject to expulsion. We would, of course, .be interested in performing the soils engineering work for the project, but must refrain from propo~ing in any manner that would constitute competitive bidding·. If you wish to consider our firm, we will be pleased .to d.iscuss our services ond the cost thereof on .a professio!lal basis. LC-FB/ex (2 copies submi ttcd) L. LeROY CRANDALL, C. E. FREDRICK A. BARNES LEOPOLD HIRSCHFELDT Agenda. Item #65 Yours very truly, LeROY CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES ·~~ ,? J byc__~;\~~cu ~ ... . LeRoy Cranda~ t~ RUSSELL C. WEBER. C. E. SEYMOUR S. CHIU, C. E. ROBERT CHIERUZZI. C: J. D. KIRKGARD. C. E. P. A. MALJIAN, C. E. JAM~S L. VAN 'BEVEREN. C. E. • JAMES M. McWEE. C. E. BB·-7 District 2 t·•. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS . of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 January 22, 1971 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ON SUPERVISORY AND MANAGEMENT OVERTIME AND COMPENSATION Subcommittee Members: Ed Just (Chairman) Ellis N. Porter Wade Herrin Morton Baum Pursuant to the request of the Executive Committee, the Special Subcommittee on Supervisory and Management Overtime and Compensation has met on several occasions to review the cu~rent·regulations in this regard. The following are the recommendations of this subcommittee~ (1) (2) (3) (4) Delete excess time provisions of the regula- tions for supervisory personnel Provide, at Districts' expense,"life insurance one and one-half times the base salary (to a $50,000 maximwn) for all supervisory personnel (A) Investigate the possibility of a larger percentage at the employee's expense Provide an Endowment policy in the amount of $5,000 for five years, for department heads and management personnel only, at employee's option. Districts to pay half; employee to pay half. Add a provision to permit employees to defer a portion of their income until retirement or separation from Districts. Deferred portion to be placed in a reserve accotmt and the amount to be def erred is to be determined annually by the employee COMPENSATORY TIME RECAP ADMINISTRATIVE AND SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES The following represents a contingent liability of $40~455.00.* POSITION TITLE General Manager Ass't. General Manager- Chief Engineer Directo.r of Finance Maintenance Superintendent . Director of Operations and Laboratories Deputy Chief Engineer Office Engineer Plant Maintenance Supervisor Collection Facilities Supv. Mechanical Supervisor Electrical Supervisor Chief Operator Laboratory Supervisor and Research Associate Engineer Associate Assistant Rnginecr Accountant Chief of Industrial and Perm~i_ t Di vision ~-Amount based on year earned EMPLOYMENT DATE 1959 1958 1959 1962 1956 1961 1964 195r( 195h 1960 1963 1961 1970 .. ACCRUED COMPENSATORY TIME (11/1/70) 541.5 575.75 623 894 8l~o. 5 302 290.5 241 16 166 6 23 12 '(l~ 246.5 5 .. , CURRENT OVERTiiliE AND COMPENSATORY TIME PROVISIONS , The following sections have been excerpted from the current salary and conditions of employment resolutions.· These provisions have essentially been in effe~t since· October, 1963. . The carry-over range referenced in Section No. 19 has be2n.adjusted periodically to mainta~n its level relative to the supervisory classi- fications. RESOLUTION No. 70-2 .section·19. No supervisory employee who occupies a position th~t pas a salary range exceeding that of range No. 48.5, as hereinabove established, shall be compensated under the provisions of Sections 16, 17, and 18, of this resolution, except as provided .· in Section 5 of Resolution 70-3. (See notes un page 2) •. . RESOLUTION No. 70-3 Section 5-_. Any employee sepa,!at:i.ng from the District~' servicie who has performed overtime ·service and which overtime ~~ service has not been compensated for as provided in ·the Districts' most current Positjons and Salaries resolution, shall be entitled i I ; .. ! I ( to full pay at his regular rate at tim~ of separation for such over- time service.· Any such overtime pe,y shall be ·separate1y j_temized and paid in a lump sum on the payroll following sepaTatlon. When separation is caused by the death of an employee; payment shall be made to the estate of such employee, or in applicable cases, as provided by Section 630. of the Probate Code. Nothing in this ··section she,11 ~e interpreted as prevcntj_ne the General M~no.ge:r from .f:tlling a pof.:i_ ti on vacated by separation j_mmecUe,tcly folloi.·dnz, the last day ac tuf1,l1y worked by the scpara.ted employee. Sect.Jon 6. .Management and supcrvlsory personnel \·rho occup~,r "-"" posit:tons ~·1h:i.c:h ha.vc a se,le.1·y or r.e.lm.'Y. ranr:c exceeding tha.t ~.ct forth in Scc.ti0n 19 of the D1stricts' rnof,t ctnTent Posit:i.on;. a.nd SalarJ0s rcsolvt:i.on, shall not be e:omp0nc-.at~:c1 for overtiH:c af~ P rovided in Se:ction 16 the1--eof. FJotrpver t't-G 1 M 1 1 ~· .. , i.Le enera_ anager s 1a1 __ cause a record to be kept of the accumulated overtime service of such empJ°.oyecs and may grant cquj_va.lent time off with ful1 po.y at any t_ime dui"lng employment to such employe0f~ upon a.ppJlcation. NOTES: - Section 16 of Resolution No. 70-2 provides for maximum paymen_t of 2L~ hours overtime per month for non-supervisory personnel. Section 17 of Resolution No. 70-2 provides for shift dif- ferential payment for non-supervisory Operations Department personnel. Section 18 of Resolution No. 70-2.provides for weekly standby pay for non-supervisory Maintenance personnel. ~ December 22, 1970 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 MEMORANDUM TO: Special Committee for Surveying Compensatory Time Provisions for Supervisory Personnel ATTENTION: Chairman Edward Just SUBJECT: Life Insurance for Supervisory Personnel I In accordance with your request concerning the cost of various life insurance programs for supervisory personnel not eligible for overtime, we have received the following preliminary information from our group ins~rance carrier: Life Insuranc~ at 1-1/2 Times Annual Salary 2 Maximum $502000 Estimated Annual Cost Life Insurance at 2 Times Annual Sala~2 Estimated Annual Cost Life Insurance i.n the following groups: Manager and Assistant Manager Department Heads Supervisors Estimated Annual Cost $ 3,200 Maximum $502000 $ 25,000 20,000 15,000 $ l~, 200 $ 2,300 Deferred Compensation Plan_ (~1anagement and D~Jmrtment __ Ij_eads Only) During the past year, the Executive Committee has discussed a deferred .compensation plan for key employees. The enclosed letter from Connect:i.cut General· Life Insurance Cc)mpa.ny outlj ncs such a plan an~ indicate~ the annual cost. ./· /~~ 'f~-.::~~~-.; Rkhard A. Strassel, CL.U. District Ma nag er Orange County Gro'up Office November 11, 1970 Mr .• Wayne Sylvester County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 108!~4 Ellis Avenue Post Office Box 5175 Fountain Valiey, California Dear Wayne: Re: Deferred Compensation for Key Employees 863 South Main Street, Suite 205 Orange, California 92668 Telephons 538-1121 Early this year we considered in great detail the ra.'11ifications of installing a Deferred Compensation Program for certain key employees. This letter is to review, as briefJ.y as possible, the best way to handle such a program. The objectives of your plan will be to provide: 1. A benefit of $5,000/year, in addition to retirement benefits, starting at age 60 and payable for five (5) years. 2. 'l'o provide the widow of the employee a $5 '· 000/year· income for five (5) years following the death of the employee. 3. 'I'o assure that these benefits are not interrupted due to the employee's inability to work due to extended disability. Such· a plan would assist you in retaining key employe.es in the face of competition for their services from both private industry and other governmental agencies, as well as rewarding them for long service to the Districts. "-"" Mr. ~!ayne Sylvester Page 2 November 11: 1970 The individuals to be covered would be: Fred Harper Wayne Sylvester Will·iam Clarke Ted Dunn Paul Brown Age 47 Age 33 Age 42 Age 38 Age 58 There are a couple of ways that this can be done. The easiest way is . ·to purchase Endowment Policies. These will provide the necessary cash at age 60 or de~th, whichever occurs first. The Waiver of Premium provision will assure that the plan will be self-completing in the event that the employee becomes disabled, at no further cost to the Districts. In Paul Brown's case, Endowment at age 60.would not. be available (and would be prohibitively expensive if it was available.) In Paul's case. the best bet would be a ten year endowment. This would allow Paul the full benefit at age 68. If he retires prior to that date, you would provide a reduced benefit accoI'.ding to the following schedule: Lump Sum Payment or Annual Income for 5 Years · After 2 Years $ 3' 175 3 Years 5,450 4 Years 7,825 5 Years 10,325 6 Years 12,925. 7 Years 15,675 8 Years 18,575 9 Years 21,675 Waiver of Premilm1 would not-app1y in his case. The cost of this prograrn would be: It1red Harper .Wayne Sylvester William Clarke Ted Dunn Paul Rrown Total $1,895.25 750.50 1,2119.00 977.25 2 ,551 . .2.Q $7,423.50 . $ 673 .1 '155 1,658 2, 188 2,739 3,323 3,937 4 ,59lk We discussed the possjbility of using this program in lieu of the Group Life Program for these individua1s. Frankly, I don't recommend this procedure. Group Ljfc Insurance shou1.d be in addition to these benefits. <.. · .Mr. Wayne Sylvester Page 3 November 11, 1970 It should be noted that the insurance to fund the Deferred Compensation Agreement is subject to satisfactory evidence of insurability. Evidence is not required in tne Group plan. . It would be possible to allow the Group plan to provide the death benefit prior to retirement and fund the "living benefit'' through annuity con- tracts. Using the same retirement benefit as· above, the cost would be: Fred Harper Wayne Sylvester William Clarke Ted Dunn Paul Brown (for 10 years) Total 1·· $1,653.00 625.00 1 ,081 .00 826.00 2,291.00 $6,476.00 This type of approach would not b~ self-completing in the event of dis- ability, except for the death benefit. If a death occurred, however, ·the funds for that individual would revert to the· Districts. Wayne, in my opinion, the first approach is the better one, mainly because it is "cleaner" and provides additional death benefit. These are pretty representative costs--there really is very little actual dollar difference between approaches. Your decision basically is 1 • Do we want such a plan; and 2. Are we willing to set aside approximately $7,500 to do it. I will be happy to meet vrith you and your committee to pursue the idea in depth if you desire. Sincerely, 0J)-~) ·A11 \ v/v~ Richard A. Strassel, C •. L. U. RAS/leh WIL1'IA!vi P. FICKER, A.I.A. Architecture and Planning . Suite 875 • 550 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, California 92660 • Area Code 714 • 644-1581 January 19, 1971 . Mr. Fred Harper County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 5175 . Fountain Valley, California 92708 Reference: Adm i n i s t r a t i o n - E n g i n e e ri n g B u i 1 d i .n g Dear Fred: The attached are schematic plans for your review and comment. I would appreciate having you and the staff study this submittal and then arrange a meeting where we can discuss your comments. Sketches of earlier plans have been shown to Wayne Sylvester, Ray Lewis and John Sigler. Their comments have been shown on these plans. However, I anticipate further questions and study before the final layout is obtained. Along with these early discussions there are several conditions which need consideration and discussion before proceeding. These are: a. Elevator: The elevator is required to service the second floor for use by handicapped persons. This could be completely installed now or prepared for, now, and furnished later. This was not covered by the original budget. b. Conference Room: Enlarging of the conference room by approximately 8 feet seems feasible and we feel could. be within this budget .. The co~t will probably be $3,500.00 to $4,000.00. I wouid like confirmation if this is necessary. c. Vault Door: It has been recommended that this door be relocated to the wall adjoining the reproduction room. The added cost of this is hard·to determine, but I would like to consider the netessity of this move. . . Mr. Fred Harper· Co~nty·sanitation Districts of Orange County January 19, 1971 Page Two Except for the above the final layout is a matter of study and coordination with you and the staff. The cooperation we have receive~ has been very good and the replies to our questions expedient. At present we are a few days behind schedule, but feel this time can be made-up during the next phase. Your immediate attention to the enclosed plans would be appreciated. ·If there are any questions regarding th·e plans, please contact me or Jim Green and we will be glad to discuss them. After you have reviewed the plans we can arrange a meeting to discuss· your comments. Respectfully, WILLIAM P. FICKER, A.I.A . ( . ( --.._ --,.. ~ ( ~' . ---~-1/ . ______ ... -i , . .-'(' ~1T . ...._ . -~-au 1 Y:··_i"R1f f~rig, A. I. A. ;_ Project Architect -r-- PJ R: j b Enclosure WI.LLIAM P. FICKE.R, A.I.A. Architecture and Planning Suite 875 • 550 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach; California 92660 • Area Code 714 • 644-1581 January 19, 1971 Mr. Fred Harper County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Reference: Vehicle Maintenance Building Dear Fred: Attached please find the schematic phase submittal for your review and approval. As soon as you and your staff have had a chance to review the drawings we would like to discuss th~m with you and get your approval to proceed w1th the next phase. The schematic drawings SD-1 and SD-2 show the design solution to the building and site. The scope of work is an outline description of the building and material as intanded at this phase. Some slight variations in the plans or scope may occur as final plans are prepared. At this stage we would also like to review the budget. The designed building of 14,400 square feet at the budget of $120,000.00 is approximately $8.34 per square foot. This is a minimal budget. We are going to strive to keep this budget but we all shoulp anticipate that the bids may b~ higher due to the scope of the project and the ·budget. The original master planned building was assumed to be approximately 10,000 square feet housing 40 vehicles and equipme~t pieces. Work that is assumed to be not a part of the contract is: Removal of existing trees and vegetation. Asphalt paving and striping. Fencing and gates. landscaping. Soil investigation and testing. Vehicle repair and maintenance equipment~ Mr. ·Fred Harper J·a n u a r y 19 , 19 7 1 Page two In light of the above information,. I recommend that we be authorized to obtain a construction estimate from Halvorsen and Dingman as part of the next design phase. This will give an accurate cost to antiGipate during bidding. The cost of the estimate·would be approximately $400.00 to $500.00 .. If the~e is any question regarding the plan~ or scope please call me. We feel that we can meet the scheduled date of May 1, 1971, for completion of drawings. Approval of this schematic phase is requested by January 26, 1971. Respectfully, WILLIAM P. FICKER, A.I.A. r--· --...... , '" \ \ : I /' V~.J"\~; ;... Paul J. Ruffing~ ~.I.A. Project Architect PJR:etm Enclosure COUNTY SANITATION·DI:STRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY VEHICLE MAINTENANCE BUitDING SCOPE OF WORK 1. AREA: 14,400 square feet Maintenance - 8 service stalls. Storage -36 vehicles, 14 equipment. Office, Toilet, Lunch Room and Locker Room Exterior -73 storage spaces. Semi-truck service pit. 2. BUILDING: Floors -Reinforced concrete slab. Walls -Reinforced concrete tilt-up interior partition wood stud and drywall. Roof -Steel girder, wood purlin and panelized wood framing. · Built-up composition roofing. Doors -Metal overhead roll-back (manual operation). Finish -Paint interior and exterior. Lighting -Suspended fluorescent. Heating -Office and Lunch Room -heating, ventilating and air conditioning. Maintenance -heating and ventilating only. 3. EXTERIOR: Paving -Asphalt concrete (33,800 square feet) Fencing - 8 feet high (brick or concrete). Sliding gates at driveways. Lighting -Security pole mounted quartz fixtures. PJR:jb 1/19/71 ~· POST OFFICE BOX DI . I R v I N E I c A L I F 0 R N I A 9 2· 6 6 4 .. Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager January iz, 1971 Orange County Sanitation District · P •.. 0 • Bo~ 812 7 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Mr. William Hurst, the new General Manager of the Irvine Ranch Water District; and the undersigned would.very much appreciate your arranging an opportunity for us to meet with your Board of Directors, or an appropriate committee of your Board, to ··discuss the possibility of establishing some rr"iutually bene- ficial joint us·e o_f the Joint Sanitation Districts'. ocean · disposal facilities. Duririg the past seve~al months, the Irvine Ranch· Water Dist~ict has made some major strides towa~d the establishment of clear- cut goals with respect to its Water Management Progrant. The specific actions necessary to achieve these goal$ havE also become· much clearer and better derined tha.n they were when this District previously discussed cooperative possibilities with your agency. It may be of interest for your Board ~embers to know that the type of inter-agency cooperation which we wish to discuss with them does not involve any attempt at this late date to purchase capacity in the Sunflower Trurik Sewer. The approach we have in mind would also eliminate any need for the inland area of the Irvine Ranch to construct outfall capacity at Crystal Cove. In addition, our "Total Water Management Concept" places major emphasis on the reclamation and re-use of waste waters, while at;: the same time recognizing the need for a limited amount of _.... .. . , ..;·· Mr. Fred A. Harper January 12, 1971 Page 2 ocean disposal capacity as a fail-s~fe fe~ture.· W~ believe these ·obj~ctives would meet. with the approval of your Directors and that they may be willing to assist us in implementing such a pro- gram, Mr. H_urst and I both look hopefully forward to the pleasure of personally meeting and talki.ng with your Boc;3.rd members or their designated representatives. Very truly_yours, IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT .~/L~kr~ Ray L. Stoyer Director of Planning RLS:db MEMORANDUM January 27, 1971 TO: Lindsley Parsons, Chairman of District No. 5 FROM: Ray E. Lewis, Deputy Chief Engineer SUBJECT: Feasibility of Household Flow Reduction Methods to Reduce Sewage Flows The Engineering Department has had the opportunity to review the United States Department of the Interior publication, "A Study of Flow Reduction and Treatment of ·waste Water from Households". This Federal Water Quality Administration sponsored report incor- porates not only flow reduction methods which might be applica.ble to the areas served by the Districts but also details household treatment and disposal methods which we ~o not feel are feasible at this time to incorporate in Orange County. Of particular interest was a presentation of the modification or substitution of existing plumbing fixtures which could result in an average per capita reduction in the vrn ter· consumpticn and sev1age discharge of frqm 14 to 24 gallons per day. Those particular plumb- ing fixtures which lend themselves to modification or· substitution and also acceptance by the user are as follows: 1. Limiting flow :valve for shower }).eads. 2. Limiting flow valve for lavatory. 3. Limiting flow valve for kitchen sink. 4. Batch-type flush valves in dual cycle. 5. Shallow trap water closet. 6. Dual cycle water closet.(British pioneered system). If we consider that these flow reduction plumbing devices were incor- porated to serve the increasing population from today to the year 2000 this would affect approximately 1.2 million people which could result in an overall sewage reduction of from 17 to 29 million gal- lons per day of the projected flows for the year 2000. This flow reduction would also result in a 2.9 million dollars to 3.8 million dollars savings in capital cost outlays for primary treatment and disposal facilities based on today's construction cost and a 250 thousand dollar to 350 thousand dollar annual treatment and rlisposal cost not considering post-chlorination of the effluent. H. CONSENT CALENDAR: NOTICE TO PUBLIC All matters listed under CONSENT CALENDAR are considered by the Council to be routine and will all be enacted by one motion in the form liste~ below. There will be no separate discussion of the·se items prior to the time the .Coun c il votes on the motion unless members of the Council,· st~ff, or the public request specific items to be discussed and/ or removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.· Members of the publ~c who wish i:o d.iscuss a Consent Calendar item should come forward to the lectern upon invitation by the Mayor, state their name, address and Consent Calendar item number. 1. COMMUNICATIONS -For filing: (a) Copy of letter from Don Adkinson to Mr. John Willoughby, Chair.man Citizens Cor.:i.mitte e, City of Anaheim regarding Sa.::.1ta Ana Riv er Study and enclosing copy of "Comments of part ·Of the Citizens Committee Repr e senting the City of Newport Beach as part of the Advisory Group for the Study of the. Sant a Ana River £ron1. the Prado Dam to the Sea." {Attached for Council ) (b) Copy of letter from Joseph H. Donohue to the Governor and all Legislators suggesting a change in the method for financing local fire departments. (Attached for Coun_cil ) (c) 1970 Orange County Granl Jury reports on planning, communications and Orange County Sheriff's office. (Attached for Council) (d) Notice of Prehearing Conference before Public Utilities Commission in connection with application of Southern California Edison Company for increase in rates. (e) Notices from Local Agency Formation Commission. of hearings on December 23, 1970 iii connection with the following: (1) Proposed annexation to the Co~tu. 1vfesa Sanitary Dist:i.'"ict designated Engin_eer' s No. 132, located at the easterly end of the triangle formed by San Diego Freew ay and Greenvflle Banning Channel. · · (2) Proposed annexation to the Costa Mesa Sanitary District designated Engineer 1 s No. 134, located northerly of Baker Street and easterly of Harbor Boule v ard in the CHy of Costa lvf.e sa. -9- (f) Preliminary Agenda for Local Agency Formation Commission meeting of Decembel". 23 indicating among matters to be considered the proposed annexatio:i:i to County Sanitation District No. 5, Annexation No. 4. (g) Copy of agenda of Board of Supervisors meetings held December 15 and 16, 1 9 7 0. ·(h) Copy of minutes of Orange County Mosquito Abatement . District mee'ting held November 19, 1970. 2. COMMUNICATIONS -For referral: (a) To staff for reply, letter from Tom Shelton protesting destruction of the Fun Zone in Balboa. (Attached for Council) (b) To staff for reply, letter from Mrs. Ernest Ballif requesting stricter enforcement of the leash law and animal nuisances l _aw. 3. RESOLUTIONS -For adoption: (a) Resolution No. authorizing the execution of an indemnity ag:Ceement between the City of Newport Beach a:p.d The Irvine Company in connection with Tract 6927 storm drain system, along Bayside Drive at El Paseo Drive. _(Report from Public Works Director attached) (b) Resolution No . requesting the County of Orange to include within the arterial highway financing program the development of Ball;>oa Boulevard. (Report from Public Works Director · attached) (c) Resolution N~. requesting the County of Orange to include within the arterial highway financing program the development of University Drive (North). (Report from. Public Works Directo:::- attached) (d) Resolution No. awarding a contract for Balboa Parking Lot improvements, Contract No. 1260, to Astec/ Loughran in the amount of $249, 656 . 90. (Report from Public Works Pi.rector attached) (e) Re .solution No. · authoriz_ing the execution of a parking agreement between the City of Newport Beach, The Irvine -10- EXCEHPT~-) FROM THE MINurrES OF T-HE HEGULAR J.OJNT MEETII~C; OF 'I'HE BOARDS OF1 DIRECTOHS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 an~ 11, OF OF.At-!GE COUNTY, Cl\LIFORNii'. A regular .j oin-C meeting of the Boar.Js of .'Di.rec t:n~s '.)f County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6J 7J and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour .of 7:30 p.m., February 10 . . , 19 71 , 1081+1+ Ellis. Avenue, Fountain VaUey;, CaJ.jfornia. The Chairman of the Joint A'iministrative Organization called the mee~ing to ~rder at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called ar,~1 the Secretary rcpoi-te.::i a quorum. present for each Di8 tric t' s Bc)a1·rl. * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 7 AdJ_':',:l rnme n t Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Boa.rd of Directors of County Sani ta.tion District No. 'l, be e.~journed to February 23, 197J_, a.t 5:00 p.m. The ChA.1rm:=m then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:43 p.m., Feb :ruary 10, 1971. STATE OF CALIFORNIAl SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boar~s of Directors ~f County Sanitation Distri2ts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, •1 0 hereby certify that the above and fcregoing to be full, true anc~ c::>rrect ce>py of minute entries on meeting of sai0 Boar~s of Directors on the 10th d~y of February i9 --r1 ' IN WIT!-!ESS \ .. :HEREOF, I have hereunto set my han·l this 11~•th Februa.yr .-lay of Nos. 1, 2, 3, EXCERPTS FROM rJ.·Hk 1.-i!NU'l'ES OF 'I'HE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOArtDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2~ 3, 5, 6, 7 ani 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting ~f the Boarjs of birect~rs 8f County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, ?, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour .of 7:30 p.m., Februa.ry 10 ., 19 71 , 10844 Ellis· Avenue, Fo~ntain V~lleyJ California. The Chairman of the Joint A1ministrative Organization called the me e t i. r: g to ::>rd e r a t 7 : 3 0 p . m • The roll was 12alled anrl the Secretary rep~rte-1 a ouorum. present for each District's Boar~. * * * * * * * * * DISTRIC'J.1 1 Ad ti ournmen t Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, be adjourned to February 23, 1971, at 5:00 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned &.G 9:42 p.ru., February 10, 1971. STATE OF CALIFORNIAl SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boar~s of DiTectors ~f County Sanitation Distri~ts Nos. 1, 2, 5, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, -1 0 hereby certify that the above and foregoing t::> be full~ true an~ correct copy of minute entries on meeting of sai1 Boards of Directors on the 10th day of Fehruary 19 71 . ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hawl this . ...:i ay of 1, 2' S-187 Nos. EXCERPrrs FHOM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAH :1 OINT MEETING OF THF. BOARDS OF DIHEC'TORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 ani 11, OF ORAI>JGE COUNTY, CALI FORNI/'. A regular joint meeting of the BoarJs of Direct~rs 8f County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, an~ 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., February 10 , 1971 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. · The Chairman of the Joint kiministrattve Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was ~alled anrl the Secretary reporte~ a ouorum present for each Dj_strict's Boarn. * * * * * * * * * DISTHICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adc.iournment That this meetj_ng of the Boa,rd of Directors of C0unty Sanitation Dj_strict No. 2, be a.dj ourncd to Fcbr-iar,y 2'~, 1971 at 5: 30 p. m.. The Chs.inrw.11 then declared the meeting so adjounred at 9:49· p.m., F'eb1·uary 10, 1971. STATE.OF CALIFORNIAl SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ~ I, J. WAY.NE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boarris of Directors :Jf County Sanitation Dtstri::ts Nos. 1, 2,.3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, -1 0 hereby certify that the above an '.'.:1 foregoing t:> be full, true anc~ correct copy of minute entiries on meeting 9f sai~ Boards ·or Directors on the 10th day of February 19 71 . ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my b&nrl this .-lay of S-187