HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971-01-06 I
County Sanitation Districts "' R.Q. Box 5175, Ellis Avenue
OF ()range County, California Fountain 1084-F
Valley, CaliF., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 714
(� If 540-2910
V1 R1L.+ T a+�1�. 962-2411
December 31, 1970
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday, January 6, 1971
7 :30 p.m.
The following is a brief explanation of the items which appear
on the enclosed agenda.
No. 5 - VERBAL STATUS REPORT OF STAFF ON TENTATIVE JOINT CONSTRUCTION
OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL AND WATER CONSEttVAL'10N DISTRICT: Since the November 18th
meeting of the Board, the staff has met with representatives of the
Riverside interests on two occasions . The first three items appearing
on the agenda are related to these discussions .
No. 7 - FIRST U,1E TDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY: The
Directors will recall that at the November 18th adjourned Board
meeting, Lowry and Associates verbally presented an outline of a.
revised master plan of facilities to be constructed in the near
future . The revisions include increasing the capacity of the proposed
Santa Ana River Interceptor from the 1965 figure of 70 million
gallons per day (ragd) to 134 mgd. This capacity is to serve District
No. 2 with its ultimate annexations and does not include capacity
for Riverside and San Bernardino Counties (50 mgd) . If the upstream
capacity for Riverside and San Bernardino Counties is included, the
total capacity of the interceptor, where it . -reaches the Treatment
Plant, would be 184 mgd.
The consensus of the Board, at the time of the meeting, was
that the District should proceed to plan the project on the basis of
the revised predicted flows since the percentage increase in cost
would be only a fraction_ of the percentage increase in capacity.
Because of this development, the staf.� met with the Riverside County
Flood Control District 's Chief Engineer, Air. John Bryant, and proposed
that the May, 1970 agreement between that District and District No. 2
be ayiended to provide for optional increase in capacity for District
No. 2 over the capacity contemplated in the agreement. Mr. Bryant
indicated that this proposal would be acceptable to his District
provided that their share of the cost would not be more than originally
anticipated. This, we feel, is a generous concession since they
could take the position that if a larger pipeline is built, their
percentage of participation should correspondingly drop with a
resulting lower over-all cost to them.
It is important that this rri.atter be Fettled as soon as possible .
We have, accordingly, prepared a formal amendment to the agreement
along the lines of our proposal to Riverside. A copy of this amend-
ment, which has been approved by Mr. •Nisson, is included with the
agenda material for the Board 's consideration. We recommend its
approval at this time in order that it may be forwarded to the
Riverside District for its consideration.
No. 8 - REQUEST FROM CITY OF ANAHEIM FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A PORTION
OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER -INTERCEPTOR: The Anaheiiri City Council
adopted a resolution on December 29 requesting that the District
construct that portion of the Santa Ana River Interceptor between
Jefferson Street and Weir Canyon Road by January 1, 1974 (copy in
agenda material) . Our present tentative construction schedule
calls for completion of this section of the interceptor during
fiscal year 1974-75.
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
-2-
VQ AIR D 3 0 F E)HP,U C T 0 2 S
County Sanit4on Distrkr[S P. 0. Box 51/5
of Orange County, California 108411 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Ca;ir'., 92706
DISTRICT No.
A G E N D A
ADJOURNMENTS POSTED
Janua.ry 6., 1971 - 7: 30 CO'lp & r4ill-EAGE.FILES SET UP
EFSOLUT!0NIS CERTIRED..,,
LITTERS WRMEN....
j,iES RITTEN
e�-6 �jltj
Roll Ca.11 IAI[JUTES HLED.......
Appointment of Cha-irman pro tem., if necessary
Consideration of motion to receive and file excerpt
and seating the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors
a,s a, member of the District ' s Board
Verba.1 progress report on proposed joint construction
of the Santa. Ana. River Interceptor Sewer with the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District
Report of the Director of Finance on financing capabili-ties
rel-a.tive to proposed construction program. See pages
"All and "B" �
Consideration of Resolution No. 71-1-2. approving
CD
First Amendment ' to Waste Water Interceptor Capacity
Agreement with Riverside County Flood Control and
Wa.'(-,,er Conservation District. See pages TICTI and
and file letter from
Consideration of motion to receiv-e-.
City of Anaheim, dated December 30, 19705 and Resolution
No. 7OR-609, of the City Council, City of Anaheim,
requesting construction of the North Santa. Ana River
Trunk Line from Jefferson Street to Weir C5.nyon Road
prior to January 1, 1974; and refer to st(ad'-f for repo-)-r-t
See pages "Ell- and MY1111
Other business and communications, i f any
Considera.tion of motion to adjourn
COUNTY SANITATIO " 'DISTRICT NO. 2 ,
PRELIMINARY CASH FLOW� .,,TATEMENT PROJECTIONS -.evised 3-2/31/70
FISCAL YEARS 1970-71 THROUGH 1974-75
a.
Without Participation By Riverside County
H
c+
(D
Description 1 70-71 1 71-72 1 72-73 i 7 74 1 74-7-
REVENUE
Tax Revenue (at current rate of $.4256) 3,688,000 $ 3,983,000 $ 4, 301,000 $ 4,645,000 $ 5,017,000
Other Revenue
Federal Participation e.J" a" ` � 610,000 472,000 196,000 196,000 196,0oo
Miscellaneous Imo., i 'Pro.—t ����"�,'S "� 6o4,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000
Carry-Over From Previous Fiscal Year ' 7,865,000 7, 268,0o0 4,554, o00 2,530,000 (622,000 )
Total Funds Available �yl
y �, �,,,,� 12,767,o00 $ 12,098,000 $ 9,426,o00 $ 7,746,o00 $ 4, 966,o00
a
EXPENDITURES
Master Plan Construction 150,000 $ 3,575,000 $ 3,650,000 $ 5,o98,0oo $ 4, 165,000
"°'`vim � �S Gw� 1.•'»r
Other Expenditures - Oper ' n
and Joint Works Expansion ""4 �'" �"' 5,349,000 3,969;000 3,246,o00 3,270,000 3,341,000
Total Expenditures o,e�kT �u�� $ 5,499,000 $ 7,544,000 $ 6,896,000 $ 8,368,000 $ 7,5o6,000
Carry-Over to Following Fiscal YearlNc $ 7,268,000 $ 4,554,0o0 $ 2,530,000 $ (622,000) $ (2,54o,0o0)
Minimum Required Reserve Carry-Overc"JI� �A� �`" (3,955 ,000) (1406,000) (3,852,000) (3,411,000) (1,558,000)
Fund Balance or (Deficit) $ 3, 313,000 $ 1,148,000 $ (1, 322,000) $ (4,033,000) $ (4,o98,000)
N
t�
C+' One cent added to tax rate will raise $ 86,645 $ `93,576 $ 101,063 $ 1o9,148 $ 117,879
C-t- c l
c
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2
� �3 �7
Revised 12 1 0
PRELIMINARY CASH FLOW STATEMENT PROJECTIONS
FISCAL YEARS 1970-71 THROUGH 1974-75
With Participation By Riverside County
Describtion 1970-71 1971-72 1 72-73 1973-74 1 79 4-75
REVENUE
Tax Revenue (at current rate of $.4256) $ 3,688,000 $ 3,983,000 $ 4, 3013000 $ 4,6453000 $ 5,017,000
Other Revenue
Federal Participation 61o,000 472,000 196,o00 196,000 196,o00
Riverside Participation_ 1,6253000
Miscellaneous 6o4,000 3753000 3753000 375,000 375,0.00:
tip Carry-Over From Previous Fiscal Year 7,865,000 7,268,o00 6,929,000 5,655,000 2,96o,00o
Total Funds Available $ 12,767-5000 $ 133723,000 $ 11,801,0oo $ lo,871,000 $ 8,548,000
EXPENDITURES
Master Plan Construction $ 150,000 $ 238253000 $ 2,900,000 $ 43298,000 $ 2,8653000
Repayment to Other Dists . for RCFCWCD Equity 3433000 326,00o
Other Expenditures - Operating and
Joint Works Expansion 5,349,000 3,969,000 3,246,000 3,270,000 3,341,000
Total Expenditures $ 5,499,000 $ 6,794,000 $ 6,146,000 $ 7,911,000 $ 6,532,000
Carry-Over to Following Fiscal Year $ 7,268,o00 $ 6,929,000- $ 5,6555000 $ 2,96o,000 $ 2,o16,00o
Minimum Required Reserve Carry-Over (33580,000) (3,031,000) _ (3,453,060) (2,761,000) (1,558,00o)
Fund Balance or (Deficit) $ 3,688,000 $ 3,898,000 $ 2, 202,000 $ 199,000 $ 458,000
One cent added to tax rate will raise $ 863645 $ 93,576 $ 101,063 $ 109,148 $ 117,879
i . .
RESOLUTION NO. 71-1-2
APPROVING FIRST AMENDMENT TO WASTE WATER
INTERCEPTOR CAPACITY AGREEMENT• WITH
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FIRST AMENDMENT TO WASTE
WATER INTERCEPTOR CAPACITY AGREEMENT WITH
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLoOD CONTROL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain First Amendment to Waste Water
Interceptor Capacity Agreement with Riverside County Flood Control
and Water Conservation District, providing District No. 2 the
option to increase its capacity in the Santa. Ana River Interceptor
to a total capacity greater than shown in Exhibit "B" of said
agreement, ' is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
District be authorized and directed to execute- said amendment on
behalf of the District.
-PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held
on January 6, 1971.
Agenda. Item #8 -C- District 2
12-28-70
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
WASTE WATER INTERCEPTOR CAPACITY AGREF24ENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made on the day of ,
1971, by and between COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 25 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, hereinafter called District 2, and RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, hereinafter called
Riverside District.
RECITALS
1. District 2 and Riverside District on May 13, 1970, entered
into a Waste Water Interceptor Capacity Agreement which provides
for the granting and conveying by District 2 to Riverside District
of the interceptor capacity right, therein described, in the Santa
Ana River Interceptor.
2. Said Waste Water Interceptor Capacity Agreement also
provides that the granting and conveying of said capacity right
will be made upon payment by Riverside District of certain percent-
ages of the audited capital costs (Covenant 2 - "Capital Payment")
of the individual reaches of said Santa Ana River Interceptor, which
percentages of costs are based on Exhibit "B" -- "Schedule of Antici-•
pated Capacity by Reaches (MGD) ".
3. It is in the best interests of. District 2 and Riverside
District to amend said Waste Water Interceptor Capacity Agreement
to provide for possible additional capacity for District 2 over that
shown in said Exhibit "B".
Agenda Item # D-1 District 2
2.
i
COVENANT'S
IN CONSIDERATION of the premises and of the covenants, rights
and obligations herein contained, the parties hereto covenant and
agree as follows :
1. Option by •District 2 to Increase Capacity. An additional
covenant is hereby added to said Waste Water Interceptor Capacity
Agreement to read as follows :
"8 (a) . Option to Increase Capacity. District 2 shall have
the option, to be exercised by written notice at least 30 days prior
to advertising for bids for construction of any reach of the Santa
Ana River Interceptor, to construct any or all of Reaches 1, 2, 33
4 5, and 6 of said facility to a total capacity greater than shown
in Exhibit "B". In the event District 2 Exercises said option, it
shall notify Riverside District of the total capacity to be con-
structed. The increase in audited capital costs caused by said
increase in capacity shall be borne solely by District 2. To
determine said increase in costs, District 2 will solicit alternate
construction- bids., one for the capacity shoi;m in Exhibit "B" and the
second for the increased capacity chosen. In the event said option
is exercised, Riverside District 's payment .obligation for capacity
rights shall be based on the percentages of audited capital costs of
the individual reaches as set forth in Covenant 2, which audited
capital costs shall. include only those payr;ients to the prime con-
tractor (Exhibit "A") which would have been made if the alternate
bid for the capacity sho:•m in Exhibit "B" were chosen. "
Agenda. Item D--2 District 2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have affixed their
signatures as of the day and year first above written.
Approved as to form: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY
MILLER, NISSON & KOGLER
- - - - - - - By . . . . . .
By Chairman- of the
Counsel Board of Directors
By . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Secretary
i
i
Recommended : RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROI,
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT.'
;i
Chief Engineer By
I Vice Chairman of the
( Board of Supervisors
,
By
Approved as to form: Clerk of the Board --
RAY 1.1. SUI,LI VAN, J R.
By - ---� -----
Coiin�.y Counsel
Cl,-7\YSON, STARE, RO'I HROCK & MANN
By
--- - Special CotinsseJ.--- -
tis
Agenda. Item //8 D-3 District 2
i
i
i
A
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
o`ND-E°may/ Office of City Clerk
December 301 1970
Orange County Sanitation District
P. 0. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Gentlemen:
The City Council of the City of Anaheim, at their regular meeting
held December 29, 1970 , received Sanitary Sewer Study prepared
by the Public Works Department relative to service in that
area bounded by Jefferson Avenue, Weir Canyon Road, Esperanza
Road and the Santa Ana River.
It was reported that City facilities are inadequate and will
not accommodate the pending and projected development in this
area. As a result, the City Council unanimously adopted
Resolution No . 70R-609 , urging Sanitation District No . 2 to
construct the North Santa Ana River Trunk Line from Jefferson
Street to Weir Canyon Road prior to January 1 , 1974.
A copy of Resolution No. 70R--639 will be forwarded to your
office as soon as it has been executed by Mayor Dutton.
Very truly yours ,
CITY OF ANAHEIM'
(MRS .) DENF, M. WILLIArIS , CITY CLERY;
DKIM: 1dr
..r cc Public Works Director
P. 0. Box 3222, Anaheim, California 92803
lgend _Item JL9- -E- District 2
RESOLUTION 140. 70R-609
1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF FR�QiJESTIaG i'_i�; CONSTRUCTION OF A
2 TRUNK SE.9ER ALO 1G THE 110RTH SIDE OF THE SAINTA
ANA RIVER.
3
4 WHEREAS , there are large •areas within Orange Co:-:ty.
Sanitation District No. 2 , north of Cie Santa Ana River, which
5 have a need for trunk sewers to adequately serve such area; and
6 WHEREAS , on March 10 , 1965 , District received a pre-
liminary engineering report, v,hich report reco_nlnends tie construc-
7 tion of a trunk sewer easterly of Jefferson Strec"%: acid north of
the Santa Eina River, said sewer being designated therein as the
$ North Santa Ana River Trunk Se=,er; and
g WHEREAS , the City of Anaheim constructed a Sesser in
La PaLna Avenue, frorl Jefferson to Ir;?perial Highway with the
10 design having been predicated on the interception of flogs by
the Richfield and Orchard Trunks of the Nor.t:h *Santa Ana Fiver
11 Trunk Seuer; a-lid
12 WHEREAS , during recent years a joint trunk outf.all
along the north side of the Santa Any! River, from Riverside ,
13 San Bernardino was planned. which would have also provided trunk
sei•.er car
acaty for, this area; and
14
WHEIREl,: , the jo lnt outfal7. construe-tion project does
15 not seem to be proceeding with a reasoneJ-)1e assurance of co:lple-
tion in the near future; and
16
WHEICEAS , the North Santa Anus River Trunh w5.11 pro,ride
17 the re�qi:irec3 relief for the ex?.si i.ng South Santa Ana River arunk,
as shos•,n on said report; and
18
WHEREAS , a relief trunkk ;s : er will also be necessary
19 :o relieve the Ne-,.7hope--Placentia trunk se;•:er due to projects cd
overloading i.n. ce?"Lain areas .
20
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counci.? of
21 the City of Anaheim that the Board of Directors of. the Orange
County Sanitat.i.on Ui.str .ct No. 2 be , anal they hcre'oy are , r4ci_Iested
22 to plan the iiapler.:.cntati.on of the March 1.0 , 1965 Report which
prow_i.de trunk se ier cons tZ uct-iGi1 cilon!; the north s i.dc of the
23 :nta. Ana River, particulE:rly betweon J•^.i.iF.-'_rsOn Avenue and y'-cir
Canyon P.o &, said construction to be c0n'T.lete-d prior to J nuary 1 ,
24 1974 , to provide relief to projected ove rlo--cied lines a.nc, service
to areas cu�.rent.ly without trunk se.,7ors .
25
TiiE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is eipprovcd and signed by r::s
26 th i.s 2.9 t h (gay of Decem'_ie r, 19 70 .
27
28 YLK C.
[1t1XOR OP ` 'i'lECITY O1'
J.J.],3 S I
30
31. 1
'I'iIl;-C11'Y OF A"�AiEJAI
32
J G:ills �-9 Di :_tri-ct 2
A r,d Item ..} _. -
Meeting Date I j Time � _ District
DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS
Griset Herrin 171-I-1., Culver
Miller Coco Arbiso Lewis
Porter Baum Hogard
Allen Phillips Berton Westra
_ Christie Root
DISTRICT 2 Clark Magnus
Davis Bousmar,
Just ✓ Harper - Stephenson Dutton
Christie Root ��- Finnell Gomez
Clark -Mn s ,,� �- Gibbs
`Culver Green Shipley
Stephenson ✓ Dutton �- Griset Herrin
Finnell ✓ Gomez ✓ Harvey Kanel
Herrin ✓ Griset Herrin Griset
Sims ✓ Zuniga �_ Hirth Croul
Smith ✓ Hileman ✓ Hyde Kroeser
Wedaa Machado ✓ Just Harper
Winn V Schniepp / McInnis Hirth
Hai[ir, ✓ Phillips —7 McWhinney
Miller Coco
DISTRICT 3 Parsons
Culver Porter
Arbiso Lewis Rogers Hirth
Baum Hogard _ Shipley Coen
Berton Westra Sims Zuniga
Christie Root Smith Hileman
Clark Magnus We daa Ma.chadc
Davis Bousman Winn Schniep
i Stephenson Dutton Hirstein Allen
Green Shipley Allen Phillip:
Harvey Kanel
Herrin Griset
Hyde Kroesen _ Mitchell
Just Harper _ Boyd Goldbe-
McWhinney
i Sims Zuniga OTHERS
Allen Phillips
- Harper ✓
DISTRICT Brown
---- Sylvesten 7
Parsons Carlson
Hirth Croul -` Clarke �-
Allen Phillips Dunn
Finster
DISTRICT 6 Galloway
Hohene r.
Porter Hunt
McInnis Hirth _ Keith
Allen Phillips Lowry �-
` Maddox
DISTRICT 7 Martinson ✓
Ni s s on
Miller Coco Piersall�
Griset _ Herrin _ -' Sigler
Porter * _ `r Stevens
Rogers Hirth �-` Crabb
Smith Hi._lema,n -'
Hirstein Allen
DISTRICT 11
Shipley Coen _
Gibbs _
Allen Phillips
DISTRICT 8
Boyd Goldbe g
Mitchell1_ -
A.Ilen y' Phillips "�`-
W'n
COUNTY Sd 2ATION DISTRICT NO. 2
PROJECTED CASH FLOW STATEMENT Schadule -B
FISCAL YEARS 19?0-�71 THROUGH 1974-75 Revised 7/28�1 -
(Assume no tax rate increase 1970-71)
Without participation by Riverside County
Description 1970-71 1971-72 1 72- 3 1973-74 197L-75
REVENUE
Tax Revenue (at current tax rate
of $. 4261) $ 3,699,000 $ 3, 997,000 $ 4,316,0oo $ 4,662,000 $ 5,0325000
Other Revenue
Federal Participation 610,00o 472,000 196,000 196,000 196,000
Miscellaneous 6o4;000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000
Carry-Over From Previous Fiscal Year 7,865,000 6,425,000 3, 804,000 2,1453000 1,6o8,000
Total Funds Available $ 12,778,000 $ 11,273,000 $ 8,691,OoO $ 7,378,000 $ 7,2113000 1'
EXPENDITURES
Master Plan Construction $ 1,000,000 $ 3,500,000 $ 3, 300,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 3, 100,000
Other Expenditures - Operating and
Joint Works Expansion 5,349,0o0 3, 969,o00 3, 246,000 3, 270,000 3,341,000
Total Expenditures $ 6,349,000 $ 7,469,000 $ 6,546,000 $ 53770,000 $ 6,44i, coo
Carry-Over to Following Fiscal Year $ 6,429,000 $ 33804,000 $ 2, i.45,000 $ 1,608,000 $ 7701000
Minimum Required Reserve Carry-Over (3,9173000) (33231,000) (235533000) (2, 8783000) (2,8.58,000)
Fund Balance or (Deficit) $ 2,512,000 $ 573,000 $ (408,000) $ (1,270,000) $ (2,0883000)
One cent added to tax rate will raise $ 86,814 $ 93, 800 $ 101,300 $ l09,400 $ 118,100
'j
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No. 2 T
SUMMARY -OF LAND USE PROJECTIONS ,
Zone Description Flow Total % of Total % of People
in Area in Total Flow Total per Population % of
Gal/Ac Zone Area in MGD Flow Acre in Zones Population
1. Low Density Housing 650 25,424 29.82 16.527 10.36 6 152,544 16.90
2. Med Density ;Iousing 1,550 25,238 29.60 39.116 24.51 15 378,570 41.95
3. High Density Housing 3,880 2,687 3.15 10.424 6.53 37 99,419 11.02
4. high Density Housing 5,820 4,855 5.70 28.253 17.70 56 271,880 30.13
5. Commercial 3,230 5,981 7.02 19.313 12.10 - - -
6. Industrial 3,880 9,526 11.17 36.954 23.16 - - -
7. Recreational 190 3,123 3.66 .592 .37 - - -
8. Oil Production 1,000 8,418 9.88 8.418 5.27 - - -
Totals 85,252 100.00% 159.597 100.00% 902,413 100.00%
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No. 2
MASTER PLAN
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
Santa Ana River *Interce for Sewer
With Riverside : Without
Project Limits County (50 mgd) Riverside County
Total Orange Riverside Total
Cost County County
Plant 1 to
Zatella Avenue 8,161,000 5,758,000 2,403,000 7,258,000
Katella Avenue
to 3,283,000 1,970,000 1,313,000 2,764,000
Riverside Fwy.
Riverside Fwy.
to 5,787,000 1,509,000 ' 4,278,000 2,836,000
County Line
Totals 17,231,000 9,237,000 7,994,000 12,857,000
Totals (From
June, 1969 Report) 16,533,000 7,260,000 9,273,000 7,800,000 .
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No. 2
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED `w
TRUNK SEWER FACILITIES
Project Size Capacity Cost
Inches mgd
Santa Ana River 48-84 50-184 $12,900,000
Interceptor Sewer (9,300,000) *
Yorba Linda Pump
Station and Force Main 30 18 684,000
Palm Drive Interceptor 21-39 6.5-24.5 340,000
Carbon Canyon Trunk 33-60 35-39 1,274,000
South Santa Ana
River Trunk 15718 1.8-5.7 642,000
Richfield Interceptor 33 8.2 301,000
Orchard Interceptor 30 _6.5 141,000
Kraemer Interceptor 18-21 3.4-5.0 256,000
Diversions to Euclid
Trunk Existing Sewers 25,000
Orange Interceptor 27-42 12-20 110,000
Carbon Canyon
Sub-Trunk 18-27 9.9-13 404,000
River Crossings 15-18 2.0-4.0 150,000
Rolling Hills Pump
Station Expansion 4.0 Addition 50,000
West Street Interceptor 30--33 11-15 892,000
Olive Interceptor 30 12 364,000
Fairview Interceptor 24 20 157,000
Totals 18,690,000
(15,090,000)
* .with participation by Riverside County
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No. 2
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM -
Without Participation by Riverside County
With Participation by Riverside County
PROJECT TOTAL COST 71-72 72-73 73-74 74-75 80-81 85-86
(1) Santa Ana River
Interceptor Sewer
Plant #1 to 7,300,000 3,650,000 3,650,000
Katella Ave (5,800,000) (2,900,000) (2,900,000)
Katella Ave to 2,800,000 2,800,000
Riverside Fwy (2,000,000) (2,000,000)
Riverside Fwy 2,800,000 2,800,000
to County Line (1,500,000) (1,500,000)
SUS-TOTAL 12,900,000
(9,300,000)
(2) Yorba Linda Pump
Sta S Force Main 684,000 684,000
(3) Palm Drive
Interceptor 340,000 340,000
(4) Carbon Canyon
Trunk 1,274,000 1,274,000
(5) South Santa Ana
River Trunk 642,000 642,000
(6) Richfield
Interceptor 301,000 301,000
(7) Orchard Interceptor 141,000 141,000
(8) Kraemer Interceptor 256,000 256,000
(9) Diversions to
Euclid Trunk 25,000 25,000 NNW
(10) Orange Interceptor 110,000 110,000
(11) Carbon Canyon
Sub-Trunk 404,000 404,000
(12) River Crossings 150,000 150,000
(13) Expansion of
Rolling Hills
Pump Station 50,000 50,000
(14) West St Interceptor 892,000 892,000
(15) Olive Interceptor 364,000 364,000
(16) Fairview Interceptor 157,000 157,000
TOTALS 18,690,000 3,650,000 3,650,000 5,098-1000 4,165,000 714,000 1,413,000
(15,090,000) (2,900,000) (2,900,000) (4,298,000) (2,865,000) (714,000) (1,413,000)
NOTE: All costs based on 1970-71 price level.