Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971-01-06 I County Sanitation Districts "' R.Q. Box 5175, Ellis Avenue OF ()range County, California Fountain 1084-F Valley, CaliF., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 (� If 540-2910 V1 R1L.+ T a+�1�. 962-2411 December 31, 1970 ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, January 6, 1971 7 :30 p.m. The following is a brief explanation of the items which appear on the enclosed agenda. No. 5 - VERBAL STATUS REPORT OF STAFF ON TENTATIVE JOINT CONSTRUCTION OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSEttVAL'10N DISTRICT: Since the November 18th meeting of the Board, the staff has met with representatives of the Riverside interests on two occasions . The first three items appearing on the agenda are related to these discussions . No. 7 - FIRST U,1E TDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY: The Directors will recall that at the November 18th adjourned Board meeting, Lowry and Associates verbally presented an outline of a. revised master plan of facilities to be constructed in the near future . The revisions include increasing the capacity of the proposed Santa Ana River Interceptor from the 1965 figure of 70 million gallons per day (ragd) to 134 mgd. This capacity is to serve District No. 2 with its ultimate annexations and does not include capacity for Riverside and San Bernardino Counties (50 mgd) . If the upstream capacity for Riverside and San Bernardino Counties is included, the total capacity of the interceptor, where it . -reaches the Treatment Plant, would be 184 mgd. The consensus of the Board, at the time of the meeting, was that the District should proceed to plan the project on the basis of the revised predicted flows since the percentage increase in cost would be only a fraction_ of the percentage increase in capacity. Because of this development, the staf.� met with the Riverside County Flood Control District 's Chief Engineer, Air. John Bryant, and proposed that the May, 1970 agreement between that District and District No. 2 be ayiended to provide for optional increase in capacity for District No. 2 over the capacity contemplated in the agreement. Mr. Bryant indicated that this proposal would be acceptable to his District provided that their share of the cost would not be more than originally anticipated. This, we feel, is a generous concession since they could take the position that if a larger pipeline is built, their percentage of participation should correspondingly drop with a resulting lower over-all cost to them. It is important that this rri.atter be Fettled as soon as possible . We have, accordingly, prepared a formal amendment to the agreement along the lines of our proposal to Riverside. A copy of this amend- ment, which has been approved by Mr. •Nisson, is included with the agenda material for the Board 's consideration. We recommend its approval at this time in order that it may be forwarded to the Riverside District for its consideration. No. 8 - REQUEST FROM CITY OF ANAHEIM FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A PORTION OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER -INTERCEPTOR: The Anaheiiri City Council adopted a resolution on December 29 requesting that the District construct that portion of the Santa Ana River Interceptor between Jefferson Street and Weir Canyon Road by January 1, 1974 (copy in agenda material) . Our present tentative construction schedule calls for completion of this section of the interceptor during fiscal year 1974-75. Fred A. Harper General Manager -2- VQ AIR D 3 0 F E)HP,U C T 0 2 S County Sanit4on Distrkr[S P. 0. Box 51/5 of Orange County, California 108411 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Ca;ir'., 92706 DISTRICT No. A G E N D A ADJOURNMENTS POSTED­ Janua.ry 6., 1971 - 7: 30 CO'lp & r4ill-EAGE.FILES SET UP EFSOLUT!0NIS CERTIRED..,, LITTERS WRMEN.... j,iES RITTEN e�-6 �jltj Roll Ca.11 IAI[JUTES HLED....... Appointment of Cha-irman pro tem., if necessary Consideration of motion to receive and file excerpt and seating the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors a,s a, member of the District ' s Board Verba.1 progress report on proposed joint construction of the Santa. Ana. River Interceptor Sewer with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Report of the Director of Finance on financing capabili-ties rel-a.tive to proposed construction program. See pages "All and "B" � Consideration of Resolution No. 71-1-2. approving CD First Amendment ' to Waste Water Interceptor Capacity Agreement with Riverside County Flood Control and Wa.'(-,,er Conservation District. See pages TICTI and and file letter from Consideration of motion to receiv-e-. City of Anaheim, dated December 30, 19705 and Resolution No. 7OR-609, of the City Council, City of Anaheim, requesting construction of the North Santa. Ana River Trunk Line from Jefferson Street to Weir C5.nyon Road prior to January 1, 1974; and refer to st(ad'-f for repo-)-r-t See pages "Ell- and MY1111 Other business and communications, i f any Considera.tion of motion to adjourn COUNTY SANITATIO " 'DISTRICT NO. 2 , PRELIMINARY CASH FLOW� .,,TATEMENT PROJECTIONS -.evised 3-2/31/70 FISCAL YEARS 1970-71 THROUGH 1974-75 a. Without Participation By Riverside County H c+ (D Description 1 70-71 1 71-72 1 72-73 i 7 74 1 74-7- REVENUE Tax Revenue (at current rate of $.4256) 3,688,000 $ 3,983,000 $ 4, 301,000 $ 4,645,000 $ 5,017,000 Other Revenue Federal Participation e.J" a" ` � 610,000 472,000 196,000 196,000 196,0oo Miscellaneous Imo., i 'Pro.—t ����"�,'S "� 6o4,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 Carry-Over From Previous Fiscal Year ' 7,865,000 7, 268,0o0 4,554, o00 2,530,000 (622,000 ) Total Funds Available �yl y �, �,,,,� 12,767,o00 $ 12,098,000 $ 9,426,o00 $ 7,746,o00 $ 4, 966,o00 a EXPENDITURES Master Plan Construction 150,000 $ 3,575,000 $ 3,650,000 $ 5,o98,0oo $ 4, 165,000 "°'`vim � �S Gw� 1.•'»r Other Expenditures - Oper ' n and Joint Works Expansion ""4 �'" �"' 5,349,000 3,969;000 3,246,o00 3,270,000 3,341,000 Total Expenditures o,e�kT �u�� $ 5,499,000 $ 7,544,000 $ 6,896,000 $ 8,368,000 $ 7,5o6,000 Carry-Over to Following Fiscal YearlNc $ 7,268,000 $ 4,554,0o0 $ 2,530,000 $ (622,000) $ (2,54o,0o0) Minimum Required Reserve Carry-Overc"JI� �A� �`" (3,955 ,000) (1406,000) (3,852,000) (3,411,000) (1,558,000) Fund Balance or (Deficit) $ 3, 313,000 $ 1,148,000 $ (1, 322,000) $ (4,033,000) $ (4,o98,000) N t� C+' One cent added to tax rate will raise $ 86,645 $ `93,576 $ 101,063 $ 1o9,148 $ 117,879 C-t- c l c COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 � �3 �7 Revised 12 1 0 PRELIMINARY CASH FLOW STATEMENT PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEARS 1970-71 THROUGH 1974-75 With Participation By Riverside County Describtion 1970-71 1971-72 1 72-73 1973-74 1 79 4-75 REVENUE Tax Revenue (at current rate of $.4256) $ 3,688,000 $ 3,983,000 $ 4, 3013000 $ 4,6453000 $ 5,017,000 Other Revenue Federal Participation 61o,000 472,000 196,o00 196,000 196,o00 Riverside Participation_ 1,6253000 Miscellaneous 6o4,000 3753000 3753000 375,000 375,0.00: tip Carry-Over From Previous Fiscal Year 7,865,000 7,268,o00 6,929,000 5,655,000 2,96o,00o Total Funds Available $ 12,767-5000 $ 133723,000 $ 11,801,0oo $ lo,871,000 $ 8,548,000 EXPENDITURES Master Plan Construction $ 150,000 $ 238253000 $ 2,900,000 $ 43298,000 $ 2,8653000 Repayment to Other Dists . for RCFCWCD Equity 3433000 326,00o Other Expenditures - Operating and Joint Works Expansion 5,349,000 3,969,000 3,246,000 3,270,000 3,341,000 Total Expenditures $ 5,499,000 $ 6,794,000 $ 6,146,000 $ 7,911,000 $ 6,532,000 Carry-Over to Following Fiscal Year $ 7,268,o00 $ 6,929,000- $ 5,6555000 $ 2,96o,000 $ 2,o16,00o Minimum Required Reserve Carry-Over (33580,000) (3,031,000) _ (3,453,060) (2,761,000) (1,558,00o) Fund Balance or (Deficit) $ 3,688,000 $ 3,898,000 $ 2, 202,000 $ 199,000 $ 458,000 One cent added to tax rate will raise $ 863645 $ 93,576 $ 101,063 $ 109,148 $ 117,879 i . . RESOLUTION NO. 71-1-2 APPROVING FIRST AMENDMENT TO WASTE WATER INTERCEPTOR CAPACITY AGREEMENT• WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FIRST AMENDMENT TO WASTE WATER INTERCEPTOR CAPACITY AGREEMENT WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLoOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain First Amendment to Waste Water Interceptor Capacity Agreement with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, providing District No. 2 the option to increase its capacity in the Santa. Ana River Interceptor to a total capacity greater than shown in Exhibit "B" of said agreement, ' is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District be authorized and directed to execute- said amendment on behalf of the District. -PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held on January 6, 1971. Agenda. Item #8 -C- District 2 12-28-70 FIRST AMENDMENT TO WASTE WATER INTERCEPTOR CAPACITY AGREF24ENT THIS AGREEMENT is made on the day of , 1971, by and between COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 25 OF ORANGE COUNTY, hereinafter called District 2, and RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, hereinafter called Riverside District. RECITALS 1. District 2 and Riverside District on May 13, 1970, entered into a Waste Water Interceptor Capacity Agreement which provides for the granting and conveying by District 2 to Riverside District of the interceptor capacity right, therein described, in the Santa Ana River Interceptor. 2. Said Waste Water Interceptor Capacity Agreement also provides that the granting and conveying of said capacity right will be made upon payment by Riverside District of certain percent- ages of the audited capital costs (Covenant 2 - "Capital Payment") of the individual reaches of said Santa Ana River Interceptor, which percentages of costs are based on Exhibit "B" -- "Schedule of Antici-• pated Capacity by Reaches (MGD) ". 3. It is in the best interests of. District 2 and Riverside District to amend said Waste Water Interceptor Capacity Agreement to provide for possible additional capacity for District 2 over that shown in said Exhibit "B". Agenda Item # D-1 District 2 2. i COVENANT'S IN CONSIDERATION of the premises and of the covenants, rights and obligations herein contained, the parties hereto covenant and agree as follows : 1. Option by •District 2 to Increase Capacity. An additional covenant is hereby added to said Waste Water Interceptor Capacity Agreement to read as follows : "8 (a) . Option to Increase Capacity. District 2 shall have the option, to be exercised by written notice at least 30 days prior to advertising for bids for construction of any reach of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, to construct any or all of Reaches 1, 2, 33 4 5, and 6 of said facility to a total capacity greater than shown in Exhibit "B". In the event District 2 Exercises said option, it shall notify Riverside District of the total capacity to be con- structed. The increase in audited capital costs caused by said increase in capacity shall be borne solely by District 2. To determine said increase in costs, District 2 will solicit alternate construction- bids., one for the capacity shoi;m in Exhibit "B" and the second for the increased capacity chosen. In the event said option is exercised, Riverside District 's payment .obligation for capacity rights shall be based on the percentages of audited capital costs of the individual reaches as set forth in Covenant 2, which audited capital costs shall. include only those payr;ients to the prime con- tractor (Exhibit "A") which would have been made if the alternate bid for the capacity sho:•m in Exhibit "B" were chosen. " Agenda. Item D--2 District 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have affixed their signatures as of the day and year first above written. Approved as to form: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY MILLER, NISSON & KOGLER - - - - - - - By . . . . . . By Chairman- of the Counsel Board of Directors By . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Secretary i i Recommended : RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROI, AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT.' ;i Chief Engineer By I Vice Chairman of the ( Board of Supervisors , By Approved as to form: Clerk of the Board -- RAY 1.1. SUI,LI VAN, J R. By - ---� ----- Coiin�.y Counsel Cl,-7\YSON, STARE, RO'I HROCK & MANN By --- - Special CotinsseJ.--- - tis Agenda. Item //8 D-3 District 2 i i i A CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA o`ND-E°may/ Office of City Clerk December 301 1970 Orange County Sanitation District P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: The City Council of the City of Anaheim, at their regular meeting held December 29, 1970 , received Sanitary Sewer Study prepared by the Public Works Department relative to service in that area bounded by Jefferson Avenue, Weir Canyon Road, Esperanza Road and the Santa Ana River. It was reported that City facilities are inadequate and will not accommodate the pending and projected development in this area. As a result, the City Council unanimously adopted Resolution No . 70R-609 , urging Sanitation District No . 2 to construct the North Santa Ana River Trunk Line from Jefferson Street to Weir Canyon Road prior to January 1 , 1974. A copy of Resolution No. 70R--639 will be forwarded to your office as soon as it has been executed by Mayor Dutton. Very truly yours , CITY OF ANAHEIM' (MRS .) DENF, M. WILLIArIS , CITY CLERY; DKIM: 1dr ..r cc Public Works Director P. 0. Box 3222, Anaheim, California 92803 lgend _Item JL9- -E- District 2 RESOLUTION 140. 70R-609 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FR�QiJESTIaG i'_i�; CONSTRUCTION OF A 2 TRUNK SE.9ER ALO 1G THE 110RTH SIDE OF THE SAINTA ANA RIVER. 3 4 WHEREAS , there are large •areas within Orange Co:-:ty. Sanitation District No. 2 , north of Cie Santa Ana River, which 5 have a need for trunk sewers to adequately serve such area; and 6 WHEREAS , on March 10 , 1965 , District received a pre- liminary engineering report, v,hich report reco_nlnends tie construc- 7 tion of a trunk sewer easterly of Jefferson Strec"%: acid north of the Santa Eina River, said sewer being designated therein as the $ North Santa Ana River Trunk Se=,er; and g WHEREAS , the City of Anaheim constructed a Sesser in La PaLna Avenue, frorl Jefferson to Ir;?perial Highway with the 10 design having been predicated on the interception of flogs by the Richfield and Orchard Trunks of the Nor.t:h *Santa Ana Fiver 11 Trunk Seuer; a-lid 12 WHEREAS , during recent years a joint trunk outf.all along the north side of the Santa Any! River, from Riverside , 13 San Bernardino was planned. which would have also provided trunk sei•.er car acaty for, this area; and 14 WHEIREl,: , the jo lnt outfal7. construe-tion project does 15 not seem to be proceeding with a reasoneJ-)1e assurance of co:lple- tion in the near future; and 16 WHEICEAS , the North Santa Anus River Trunh w5.11 pro,ride 17 the re�qi:irec3 relief for the ex?.si i.ng South Santa Ana River arunk, as shos•,n on said report; and 18 WHEREAS , a relief trunkk ;s : er will also be necessary 19 :o relieve the Ne-,.7hope--Placentia trunk se;•:er due to projects cd overloading i.n. ce?"Lain areas . 20 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counci.? of 21 the City of Anaheim that the Board of Directors of. the Orange County Sanitat.i.on Ui.str .ct No. 2 be , anal they hcre'oy are , r4ci_Iested 22 to plan the iiapler.:.cntati.on of the March 1.0 , 1965 Report which prow_i.de trunk se ier cons tZ uct-iGi1 cilon!; the north s i.dc of the 23 :nta. Ana River, particulE:rly betweon J•^.i.iF.-'_rsOn Avenue and y'-cir Canyon P.o &, said construction to be c0n'T.lete-d prior to J nuary 1 , 24 1974 , to provide relief to projected ove rlo--cied lines a.nc, service to areas cu�.rent.ly without trunk se.,7ors . 25 TiiE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is eipprovcd and signed by r::s 26 th i.s 2.9 t h (gay of Decem'_ie r, 19 70 . 27 28 YLK C. [1t1XOR OP ` 'i'lECITY O1' J.J.],3 S I 30 31. 1 'I'iIl;-C11'Y OF A"�AiEJAI 32 J G:ills �-9 Di :_tri-ct 2 A r,d Item ..} _. - Meeting Date I j Time � _ District DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS Griset Herrin 171-I-1., Culver Miller Coco Arbiso Lewis Porter Baum Hogard Allen Phillips Berton Westra _ Christie Root DISTRICT 2 Clark Magnus Davis Bousmar, Just ✓ Harper - Stephenson Dutton Christie Root ��- Finnell Gomez Clark -Mn s ,,� �- Gibbs `Culver Green Shipley Stephenson ✓ Dutton �- Griset Herrin Finnell ✓ Gomez ✓ Harvey Kanel Herrin ✓ Griset Herrin Griset Sims ✓ Zuniga �_ Hirth Croul Smith ✓ Hileman ✓ Hyde Kroeser Wedaa Machado ✓ Just Harper Winn V Schniepp / McInnis Hirth Hai[ir, ✓ Phillips —7 McWhinney Miller Coco DISTRICT 3 Parsons Culver Porter Arbiso Lewis Rogers Hirth Baum Hogard _ Shipley Coen Berton Westra Sims Zuniga Christie Root Smith Hileman Clark Magnus We daa Ma.chadc Davis Bousman Winn Schniep i Stephenson Dutton Hirstein Allen Green Shipley Allen Phillip: Harvey Kanel Herrin Griset Hyde Kroesen _ Mitchell Just Harper _ Boyd Goldbe- McWhinney i Sims Zuniga OTHERS Allen Phillips - Harper ✓ DISTRICT Brown ---- Sylvesten 7 Parsons Carlson Hirth Croul -` Clarke �- Allen Phillips Dunn Finster DISTRICT 6 Galloway Hohene r. Porter Hunt McInnis Hirth _ Keith Allen Phillips Lowry �- ` Maddox DISTRICT 7 Martinson ✓ Ni s s on Miller Coco Piersall� Griset _ Herrin _ -' Sigler Porter * _ `r Stevens Rogers Hirth �-` Crabb Smith Hi._lema,n -' Hirstein Allen DISTRICT 11 Shipley Coen _ Gibbs _ Allen Phillips DISTRICT 8 Boyd Goldbe g Mitchell1_ - A.Ilen y' Phillips "�`- W'n COUNTY Sd 2ATION DISTRICT NO. 2 PROJECTED CASH FLOW STATEMENT Schadule -B FISCAL YEARS 19?0-�71 THROUGH 1974-75 Revised 7/28�1 - (Assume no tax rate increase 1970-71) Without participation by Riverside County Description 1970-71 1971-72 1 72- 3 1973-74 197L-75 REVENUE Tax Revenue (at current tax rate of $. 4261) $ 3,699,000 $ 3, 997,000 $ 4,316,0oo $ 4,662,000 $ 5,0325000 Other Revenue Federal Participation 610,00o 472,000 196,000 196,000 196,000 Miscellaneous 6o4;000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 Carry-Over From Previous Fiscal Year 7,865,000 6,425,000 3, 804,000 2,1453000 1,6o8,000 Total Funds Available $ 12,778,000 $ 11,273,000 $ 8,691,OoO $ 7,378,000 $ 7,2113000 1' EXPENDITURES Master Plan Construction $ 1,000,000 $ 3,500,000 $ 3, 300,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 3, 100,000 Other Expenditures - Operating and Joint Works Expansion 5,349,0o0 3, 969,o00 3, 246,000 3, 270,000 3,341,000 Total Expenditures $ 6,349,000 $ 7,469,000 $ 6,546,000 $ 53770,000 $ 6,44i, coo Carry-Over to Following Fiscal Year $ 6,429,000 $ 33804,000 $ 2, i.45,000 $ 1,608,000 $ 7701000 Minimum Required Reserve Carry-Over (3,9173000) (33231,000) (235533000) (2, 8783000) (2,8.58,000) Fund Balance or (Deficit) $ 2,512,000 $ 573,000 $ (408,000) $ (1,270,000) $ (2,0883000) One cent added to tax rate will raise $ 86,814 $ 93, 800 $ 101,300 $ l09,400 $ 118,100 'j COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No. 2 T SUMMARY -OF LAND USE PROJECTIONS , Zone Description Flow Total % of Total % of People in Area in Total Flow Total per Population % of Gal/Ac Zone Area in MGD Flow Acre in Zones Population 1. Low Density Housing 650 25,424 29.82 16.527 10.36 6 152,544 16.90 2. Med Density ;Iousing 1,550 25,238 29.60 39.116 24.51 15 378,570 41.95 3. High Density Housing 3,880 2,687 3.15 10.424 6.53 37 99,419 11.02 4. high Density Housing 5,820 4,855 5.70 28.253 17.70 56 271,880 30.13 5. Commercial 3,230 5,981 7.02 19.313 12.10 - - - 6. Industrial 3,880 9,526 11.17 36.954 23.16 - - - 7. Recreational 190 3,123 3.66 .592 .37 - - - 8. Oil Production 1,000 8,418 9.88 8.418 5.27 - - - Totals 85,252 100.00% 159.597 100.00% 902,413 100.00% COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No. 2 MASTER PLAN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE Santa Ana River *Interce for Sewer With Riverside : Without Project Limits County (50 mgd) Riverside County Total Orange Riverside Total Cost County County Plant 1 to Zatella Avenue 8,161,000 5,758,000 2,403,000 7,258,000 Katella Avenue to 3,283,000 1,970,000 1,313,000 2,764,000 Riverside Fwy. Riverside Fwy. to 5,787,000 1,509,000 ' 4,278,000 2,836,000 County Line Totals 17,231,000 9,237,000 7,994,000 12,857,000 Totals (From June, 1969 Report) 16,533,000 7,260,000 9,273,000 7,800,000 . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No. 2 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED `w TRUNK SEWER FACILITIES Project Size Capacity Cost Inches mgd Santa Ana River 48-84 50-184 $12,900,000 Interceptor Sewer (9,300,000) * Yorba Linda Pump Station and Force Main 30 18 684,000 Palm Drive Interceptor 21-39 6.5-24.5 340,000 Carbon Canyon Trunk 33-60 35-39 1,274,000 South Santa Ana River Trunk 15718 1.8-5.7 642,000 Richfield Interceptor 33 8.2 301,000 Orchard Interceptor 30 _6.5 141,000 Kraemer Interceptor 18-21 3.4-5.0 256,000 Diversions to Euclid Trunk Existing Sewers 25,000 Orange Interceptor 27-42 12-20 110,000 Carbon Canyon Sub-Trunk 18-27 9.9-13 404,000 River Crossings 15-18 2.0-4.0 150,000 Rolling Hills Pump Station Expansion 4.0 Addition 50,000 West Street Interceptor 30--33 11-15 892,000 Olive Interceptor 30 12 364,000 Fairview Interceptor 24 20 157,000 Totals 18,690,000 (15,090,000) * .with participation by Riverside County COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No. 2 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM - Without Participation by Riverside County With Participation by Riverside County PROJECT TOTAL COST 71-72 72-73 73-74 74-75 80-81 85-86 (1) Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer Plant #1 to 7,300,000 3,650,000 3,650,000 Katella Ave (5,800,000) (2,900,000) (2,900,000) Katella Ave to 2,800,000 2,800,000 Riverside Fwy (2,000,000) (2,000,000) Riverside Fwy 2,800,000 2,800,000 to County Line (1,500,000) (1,500,000) SUS-TOTAL 12,900,000 (9,300,000) (2) Yorba Linda Pump Sta S Force Main 684,000 684,000 (3) Palm Drive Interceptor 340,000 340,000 (4) Carbon Canyon Trunk 1,274,000 1,274,000 (5) South Santa Ana River Trunk 642,000 642,000 (6) Richfield Interceptor 301,000 301,000 (7) Orchard Interceptor 141,000 141,000 (8) Kraemer Interceptor 256,000 256,000 (9) Diversions to Euclid Trunk 25,000 25,000 NNW (10) Orange Interceptor 110,000 110,000 (11) Carbon Canyon Sub-Trunk 404,000 404,000 (12) River Crossings 150,000 150,000 (13) Expansion of Rolling Hills Pump Station 50,000 50,000 (14) West St Interceptor 892,000 892,000 (15) Olive Interceptor 364,000 364,000 (16) Fairview Interceptor 157,000 157,000 TOTALS 18,690,000 3,650,000 3,650,000 5,098-1000 4,165,000 714,000 1,413,000 (15,090,000) (2,900,000) (2,900,000) (4,298,000) (2,865,000) (714,000) (1,413,000) NOTE: All costs based on 1970-71 price level.