HomeMy WebLinkAbout1970-12-22 klCOUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
December 18, 1970
TELE PH ON ES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT NO. 7
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting on December
9, 1970, the Boa.rd of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. '(, will meet in an adjourned regular meeting:
JWS:gc
rruesday, December 22, 1970
at 5:00 p.m.
10844 Ellis Avenue
F'ountain Valley, California
Note: The E:r.:ecutive Committee wl.11 meet at 5:30 p.,m.,, fol1owing
the Distr5_et. Tfo. 7 meeting.
II
~· ·~
P. 0 . Box 5 175
MANAGER 'S AGr:NDA R!EPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, Californ ia
108 44 El li s Avenue
Fou ntain Valley, Ca lif., 92708
Ta le phones :
DISTRICT N0,_~7-
De cembe r 18, 1970
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
Tuesday , December 22 , 19f0
5:00 p .m.
The items appearing on the enc l osed Agenda were
deferred to this Adjourned Meeting from the Joint
Board Meeting on December 9th .
Nos. 6 and 7: These Agenda items re fer · to proposed
Assessment Di strict No . 9 which requires the con -·
struction of a Master Plan sub -trunk sewer i n Chapman
Avenue, easterly of Santiago Boulevard . We have been
advis ed by r epresentatives of the City of Orange that
they have had some discussions with Mr . Frank Mea d,
one of the major proponents for this project , and that
the City is considering the construction of this sub-
trunk sewer. We understand that additional information
c oncerning this matter will be presented at the Tuesday
me eting .
FAH:hja
.FJ.~ed A. Harper
General Manager
Area Code 714
5 40-2910
962 -2411
,, .. l BO A~D S O F DmECT O RS
County . Sa n ifo tion Di stricts P. 0. Bax 5 175
of Orange County, Cci fiforni3 10844 Ell is Avenu e
Fo un tain Val ley, Cal ;~., 92708
-II
fif
~
/ ~
~tr).
(5)
(6)
~ /.
/ (7
(~8)
(9 )
Ro l l Ca.11
DISTR ICT No~
Adjourned Reg u lar Meeting
December 22 , 1970 -5:00 p .m.
AGENDA
ADJOUR NMENTS POST E~
cow.P ~r~lliLEAG E ... J:. .. -
FILE S :,~; UP .... V. .......... ~ /
nE s:JtUfo):!S CERT IF IED .¥
LE TI :RS \'!~'.TTHI ............. ..
• TE~ "/" 'l 'E l1l . ./"' MINU -> I •"' .v. ...... .
MI NUTE S l-ILED .... ~ .... .
Jo.
Appointme nt of Chairman pro tern , if necessary I
,t -
n ,~ .,w-/ (J f~ Iii.)
.,:;f~· J Repo r t of the General Manage r ~J.. \, ff"_
Report of the General Counsel ?X~~t ~
Cons ideration of reque st of Jennings, Halderman and Hood,,,.1-"',¥"' .... , .''" J
for ext~nsio:n of expiration de~te for existing non-master rr::;<,. f; vl"V"J
plan Reimburseme nt Ag:r·eement No . 20 \ deferr~p. Jr~m p~ 1 { y.i .. 1 ., o
Decemb e r 9th meet i ng ) See page 11 A1 I'~ ,!f;v[(,i ,_: 'i'<-G~,_,, ~
j.V~~~ lG
a . Considerati.on of motion to receive , .. , l q' -ff )'t'·> '
and f i l e writ ten report of General Counsel ,,. i.~..,.../"'' o
r elative to effect of subject r equested ~J
extension of existing and f uture non-master
plan reimbursement agreements . See page _'._'._~--
b . Consideration of action on subject r equest
Agenda Item No. l /
REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEERS
JENNINGS· HALDERMAN· HOOD
A CORPORATION
2001 EAST FOURTH STREET, SUITE 200, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92705 (714) 835-3611
3 NOVEMBER 1 970
HONORABLE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No. 7
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
P. O. Box 5175
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
ON NOVEMBER 10, 1965 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No. 7 ENTERED INTO AN AGREEMENT
WITH THIS ORGANIZATION (ACTING AS TRUSTEE) FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS OF SAN-
ITARY SEWERS ON SIRRINE DRIVE IN THE COWAN HEIGHTS AREA OF ORANGE COUNTY. THE
AGREEMENT STATED THAT THE DISTRICT WOULD REPAY THE PROPONENTS OF THE WALSH
ANNEXATION A MAXIMUM OF $22,023.72 OVER A FIVE YEAR PERIOD.
DURING THE ENSUING FIVE YEARS ONE REIMBURSEMENT OF $2,332.46 WAS MADE IN
AUGUST OF 1966.
A~ TRUSTEE FOR THE PARTIES TO THE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WE REQUEST THAT THE
DISTRICT EXTEND THE LIFE OF THIS AGREEMENT FOR AN ADDITIONAL PERIOD OF TIME IN
ORDER TO PERMIT A FAIR AND EQUITABLE REIMBURSEMENT OF THE COSTS OF THIS PUBLIC
FACILITY TO THOSE WHO FINANCED ITS CONSTRUCTION.
SUCH AN EXTENSION IS DESIRABLE, IN OUR OPINION, FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. TWENTY SIX LOTS WERE INCLUDED IN THE WALSH ANNEXATION, OF WHICH 22 CAN
PHYSICALLY BE SERVED BY THE CONSTRUCTED FACILITY. THE ENTIRE COST OF THE
ANNEXATION AND CONSTRUCTION WAS BORNE BY NINE PROPERTY O\./NERS. BECAUSE
OF TOPOGRAPHY, IT WAS NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT NOT ONLY THE NORMAL GRAVITY .
SEWER TO SERVE THE INDIVIDUAL LOTS, BUT TO CONSTRUCT A LIFT STATION AND A
FORCE MAIN.
2. DURING THE LIFE OF THE PRESENT AGREEMENT A SINGLE REIMBURSEMENT, REPRESENT-
ING APPROXIMATELY 10 PER CENT OF THE CONTRACT AMOUNT HAS BEEN RETURNED TO
THE ORIGINAL PARTICIPANTS. WE BELIEVE THAT A PREMIUM OF $20,000 IS AN
EXCESSIVE CHARGE UPON THOSE WHO UNDERTOOK THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS IMPROVE-
MENT.
ASSOCIATES: JF:-;oNINGs E:-rn. Co., Los Angele:;• JF.:-;:-;1:-;i;;;.l\IcDrn.:110TT & HE1:0-:s F.:-;c. Co., San Jose• JENXIXG~-HARTLETT & AssocIATES, Ventura
Agenda. Item #5 A-1 District 7
~
!
I
HONORABLE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
3 NOVEMBER 1970
PAGE 2
3. ECONOMIC CONDITIONS HAVE RETARDED THE NORMAL DEVELOPMENT OF THIS AREA
DURING THE LIFE OF THE AGREEMENT.
WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THE DISTRICT EXTEND THE LIFE OF THIS AGREEMENT
FOR. A PERIOD OF f 1ME WHICH SEEMS TO THEM TO BE APPROPRIATE IN ORDER TO PERMIT
A FAIR AND EQUITABLE REIMBURSEMENT OF THE COSTS OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS
FACILITY TO THOSE INDIVIDUALS AND FIRMS WHICH PARTICIPATED IN ITS ORIGINAL
COST.
ltc~--
HJrGH E. HALDERMAN
HEH: J 1
cc: MR. WILLIAM J. CRAWFORD
Agenda. Item 115 A-2 District 7
CLARK MILLER
C. ARTHUR NISSON
NELSON KOGLER
H. LAWSON MEAD
Agenda Item No. fn Y
MILLER, NISSON S KOGLER
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
2014 NORTH BROADWAY
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706
December
8th
1 9 7 0
The Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 7
Legal Opinion re Extension of
Reimbursement Agreement Term
The original determination of the term (5
years) for the period of reimbursement for non-master
plan sewerage facilities was an arbitrary determina-
tion setting forth a policy that has generally been
followed.
No expiration date has been incorporated
into those reimbursement agreements for sewerage
facilities that have been accepted as a part of the
District's Master Plan of Sub-trunk Sewers.
There is no legal reason why non-master plan
sewerage facility reimbursement agreements need have
TELEPHONE:
542-6771
a termination date. The District does continue to collect
extra fees from property owners who use such facilities,
even though the reimbursement period may have expired.
The practical reason why non-master plan reimbursement
agreements have had a termination date is to eventually
eliminate the extra bookkeeping and accounting required.
It is believed that this is a valid reason for fixing
a termination date on these agreements.
In considering the granting of an extension
of the term for non-master plan reimbursement agree-
ments, you may consider adopting an automatic extension,
an extension upon request, limit extensi~ns to cases
where hardship can be shown, such as when the develop-
ment costs have not been recovered in the sales of
property, etc., or refuse all extensions of the term
for such agreements.
Agenda. Item #5a. B-1 District 7.
The Board of Directors
CSD #7
Page 2 -12.8.70
The effect of the general slowdown of con-
struction and land development since the original five-
year term policy was established may be considered.
The charging of a small percent of the monies collected
for reimbursements to defray district expenses in main-
taining these agreements for a longer term may also be
considered.
In the final analysis, it is desirable to have
a consistent policy but it is in no way mandatory. One
decision is not really binding upon subsequent decisions.
Each case may be considered on its own merits. When
good reasons are shown policy should change.
CAN:mjb
Agenda Item #5a.
Respectfully submitted,
C. Arthur Nissan
General Counsel
B-2 District 7
PETITION OF PROPERTY OWNERS
{Sec. 2804 -Streets and Highways Code)
We, the undersigned, being the owners of property within the area of a proposed
assessment district to be established under the 11 Improvement Act of 1911, 11 being Division 7
of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, or under 'the 11 Municipal
Improvement ~ct of 1913,11 being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State
of California, do hereby petition the Honorable Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 7 to forthwith commence and carry through to completion under the provisions
of said "Improvement Act of 1911" or said 11 Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 11 al I
proceedings for the formation of a special assessment improvement district as hereinafter
described and for the construction of the hereinafter mentioned improvements witnin the
County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, and for the acquisitfon,
under the provisions of Section 5102, or Section 10102, of the Streets and Highways Code,
of all lands, right-of-ways and easements necessary in connection with said improvements.
The area within the County Sanitation District No. 7, County of Orange, State of
California, which we hereby request your Honorable Body to declare to be the special
assessment improvement district, as hereinabove mentioned, is shown on a plat attached
hereto entitled 11 Plat of Proposed Assessment District No. 9 for Jmprovement of Sanitary
Sewers and Appurtenances in Chapman Avenue, 11 dated December 1, 1970, and on which
plat the boundaries of said proposed assessment district are outlined.
The improvements which we hereby request your Honorable Body to construct for the
benefit of the property described within the above mentioned proposed improvement district
are described as follows:
Construction of sanitary sewers and
appurtenances and a 11 appurtenant
work in Chapman Avenue and ease-
ments for sanitary sewer purposes.
We, and each of us, hereby request said improvement proceedings and the acquisition
of all lands, right-·of-ways and easements necessary in connection with improvements and
do hereby waive, and request the County Sanitation District No. 7 to dispense with any
and all proceedings all limitations under the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation
and Majority Protest Act of 1931, 11 being Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code of
the State of California.
This petition is fi I ed with you under and pursuant to the provisions of Section 2804 of
the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California as amended, being a part of the
"Special Assessment lnvesHgation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931. 11 This
petition may be filed in counterpart and/or may be joined with other petitions or petition for
similar work.
SIGNATURE OF LANDOWNER
.. /~.-> ;
FP:·.NK F. Li.:.J.D
. HENRY /'1. HOL'11~"1 ·.
I ,I I .' . /""
1':LVhhi\. A. EOL'l'Z /
Agenda. Item #6
ADDRESS OF LANDOWNER
20,C02 E~ Ch~pr'..::·n Ave.,
Or~ne·e, C;:;:lif 0nl'i•:. 92669
093--150-2'?
093-173·-Cl 093-·173-02
.~-~-:-/. 1.'.1,:' ,,_ )'
-/ : . ·. ... I·,•·"
093.~150-18
O:c~ngc, C:tlif •
093·-150-26
c
DATE OF SIGNING
Dec. 1, 1970
Dt"C. 1, 1970
/·, .· I /. -I'; ( I J
I
District 7
ENGINEERING
0
ENGINEERS e ARCH.ITECTS
412 SOUTH LYON STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHONE <714) 547-4471
ADDRESS REPLY TO P.O. BOX 178
December 7, 1970
County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley / CA 92708
Attention fvAtr. Fred A. Harper
General Manager
County Sanitation District No. 7
Proposed Assessment District No. 9
We have recently been retained by Mr. Frank Mead to prepare a petition
for the formation of an assessment district under either 1911or1913 Act
proceedings for the improvement of a sanitary sewer system to serve property
owned by Nir. Mead and three other landowners as shown on the attached
map. The proposed sewer would extend from the future extension of the
Chapman Avenue Subtrunk to a point fronting on Mr. Mead's properly.
Assuming that the petition is signed by the required majority of the landowners
and that County San itai'i on District No. 7 agrees to sponsor this assessment
district., we respectfully submit the following proposal to act as engineer of
work in connection with this proposed Assessment District No. 9.
The construction cost for this sewer is estimated to be approximately $45 1 000
for the estimated lengf·h of 3,400 feef· of sewer. The estimated total incidental
expenses, exclusive of construction surveying and construction inspection,
are $7 ,500. Engineering costs to prepare plans and specifications, proposed
boundary map of di strict 1 and all work appurtenant thereto up to the time of
award of contract under a 1911 Act proceeding will be $3,750.
Engineering costs after award of contract and through the final public hearing
under 1911 Act proceeding will be $1,250, making a tof·al engineering fee of
$5,000. This figure is exclusive of right-of-way acquisition costs 1 clerical
work in connection with mailing notices, blueprinting and other incidental
expenses not covered under the engineering fee. If the 1913 Acf· proceedings
are used, the entire engineering fee of $5r000 would be paid at time of bond
sale. We therefore propose to furnish the following engineering services.
PROFES~',IONAL ENGINEERING A N D ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
Agenda. Item #7 D-1 District 7
""-""•'
County Sanitation District No. 7
of OrangeCounty
Mr. Fred A. Harper
December 7, 1970
1 Page 2
1. Prepare preliminary engineering studies and design for review
and approva I •
2. Prepare construction plans and specifications and furnish all
necessary field work and all necessary office computations
to assist in expediting field survey work necessary for design.
3. Prepare estimates of quantities and costs.
4. Assist district in securing bidsF tabulation and analysis of bid
results and in letting of contract.
5. Furnish consultation and advice to district during construction
and perform all du ti es customarily required of the Superintendent
of Streets.
6. Review laboratory reports on material tests and inspections
and correlate such reports with the intent of the plans and
specifications.
7. Furnish periodic observations of construction work and progress
and provide appropriate eports to district.
8. Furnish a final inspection and :eport of the complei-ed project
with a representative of the district.
9. Prepare record drawings (as-constructed) when ·:Onstruction has
been completed and accepted by distrid.
10. Deliver original tracings of plans and reproducible plates of
specifications for district's use in preparing the necessary prints
for record purposes and distribui'ion to prospective bidders.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Attend all public hearings in connection with the assessment
district proceedings.
Spread the assessment and prepare 1·hc assessment rol I and final
diagram.
Assist legal counsel in preparation of applicable portions of the
resolution of intention and any modification resoluVions.
Prepare a preliminary assessment spread for initial hearing on
the resolution of intention.
Post the line of v1ork in conformance wif·h the 1911or1913 Act
proceedings.
BOYLE ENGINEERING
Agenda. Item #7 D-2 District 7
~
County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County
f'..Ar-. Fred A. Harper
December 7 1 1970
Page 3
We propose to provide f'hese services for a lump sum fee of $5,000 of which
$3, 750 covers that portion of the work in a 1911 Act proceedings up to and
including the time the contract is awarded and shall be due and payable at
that time. In the event of abandonment 1 we propose that the fee for engi-
neering services be based upon the following per diem rates and shall not
exceed $3,750 for a 1911 Act proceedings and $5,000 for a, 1913 Act proceedings.
Senior Engineer $25. 50 an hour
Associate Engineer $22 .50 an hour
Assistant Engineer $19.00anhour
Senior Draftsman $16.00 an hour
Draftsman $13.50 an hour
3-tv\an Survey Party $50. 00 an hour
Licensed Surveyor $19.50 an hour
Clerical $ 8.00 an hour
Blueprinting Cost p!us 25%
In connection with field work after award of coni-ract, we propose that all
work be perfonned in accordance with the following per diem rates.
Residen1· Engineer
Assistant Resident Engineer
Inspector
$22. 50 an hour
$19.00 an hour
$11.00 an hour
With the exception of Assessment District No. 7, County Sanitation Disfrict
No. 7 has underwritten all of the engineering and incidenf·al costs up to
the time of award of contract under the 1911 Act proceedings. In the case
of Assessment District No. 7, the property owners were required to deposit
an amount which represented the estimated cost of preparation of plans and
specifications, legal services and other incidental expenses to be incurred
prior to the time of 1·hc award of i'he contract.
BOYLE ENGINEEf~lf.!C.;
A~ncl_a. Item __ 117 D-3 District 7 -------,--
County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County
fv4.r. Fred A. Harper
December 7 / 1970
Page 4
In the event the district does not underwrite these costs, it wi 11 be necessary
for the proponents to deposit an amount for a 1911 Act proceedings as follows:
Engineering fees
Legal fees -75% of $1, 000
Printing, plans and specifications
and legal notices
$3,750
750
1, 100
$5,600
For a 1913 Act proceedings the deposit is estimated as fol lows:
Engineering fees
Legal fees
Printing, plans and specifications
and legal notices
Miscellaneous
$5,000
1,000
1,300
200
$7,500
Under either 1911 or 1913 Act proceedings, the deposit would be refunded to
the depositer after a contract is awarded (l 91 l Act) or after a bond sale
(1913 Act).
Very truly yours,
BOYLE ENGINEERING
{:) /} 4 If () L-::.£_,e_.v er l!~ -!:/-~-~
Carf A. Carlson, C. E. 6654
pp
Enc.
Mr. Frank Mead
01-0199--00-00
BOYLE ENGINCERING
Agenda. Item #7 D-4 District ''"'(
DISTRICT NO. 7
MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED FEGULAR MEETING
December 22, 1970 -5:00 p.m.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting held
December 9, 1970, the Board of .Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 7 met in an adjourned regular meeting at the
above hour and date.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. The
roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present.-
DIRECTORS PRESENT:
DIRECTORS ABSENT:
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
Clifton C. Miller (Chairman),
Lorin Griset, Ellis N. Porter,
Howard Rogers, Don E. Smith
and Wm. Hirstein
None
Fred A. Harper, General Manager,
Paul Brown, Assistant General
Manager and J. Wayne Sylvester,
Secretary
Carl Carlson, Conrad Hohener,
C. Arthur Nissan and Frank Meade
* * * * * * * *
Authorizing Amendment No. 1 to
the Sirrine Drive Sewer and
Pump Station Reimbursement
Agreement No. 20
Pump Station Reimbursement
ment Agreement No. 20), it
Following a report by the General
Manager on the request of Jennings,
Halderman and Hood for a five year
extension of the expiration date
for the .Sirrine Drive Sewer and
Agreement:: .. (Non-Master Plan Reimburse-
was moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the letter from Jennings, Halderman and Hood, dated
November 3, 1970, requesting said extension be received and
ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution
No. 70-178-7, approving Amendment No. 1 to the Sirrine Drive
Sewer and Pump Station Reimbursement Agreement No. 20,
granting an extension of the expiration date for a period
of five years,. and providing for a 10% administrative charge
to be deducted by the District from any reimbursements made
during the five year extension period.
Consideration of Petition The Board entered into a lengthy
of Property owners re: discus·sion concerning the Petition
proposed Assessment District of Property Owners for proposed
~. No .. g Assessment District No. 9 of
approximately 75 acres in the
Orange Park Acres area imJnediately adjacent to the Chapman
Avenue grade. Director Smith stated that the City of Orange
has under consideration the construction of a sewer in
Chapman Avenue that would serve ·the proposed assessment
district. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That, subject to deposit of cash or bond in the amount
of $5,600 with the District by the proponents of the
assessment district to cover incidental costs up to the
... v 1., t.ime of the award of contract for work, the Board of
,,.,\ ..... Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 will sponsor
··proposed Assessment District No. 9 to construct sanitary
sewers and appurtenances to conform to the Master Plan
of the District and connect to the sewer proposed to be
constr.ucted in Chapman Avenue by the Cit;y of Orange.
·~-~
Accepting proposal of Moved, seconded and duly carried·:
Boyle Engineering for
engineering services That the proposal of Boyle
relative to proposed Engineering, dated December 7,
Assessment District No. 9 1970, for engineering services
relative to .Proposed Assess·ment
District No. 9, be approved ·and accepted; and that the
General Manager be authorized to direct said engineers
to.proceed with said work in accordance with the terms
and conditions set forth in said proposal for a basic fee
not to exceed $5,000.
Exchange of easements
re: Contract No. 7-5-2
to an existing District
Contract No. 7-5-2, and
to the Board at a later
on this matter.
Adjournment
The Districts' General Counsel
reported on discussions concerning
an exchange of easements relative
easement on the West Trunk Sewer,
advised that he would report back
date following further discussion
· Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman
declared the meeting so adjourned at 5:37 ~.m.,
December 22nd.
ATTEST:
Secretary, Board of Directors
County Sanitation District Noo 7
-2-
Chairman, Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 7
Meeting Dat e I d J ~ ;;] / 7 0 Time
JOI1'T'11 BOABDS
Culve r
Arbiso
Baum
Berton
Christie
Cl ark
Davi s
---
Stephenson
Finne ll
Gibbs
Green
Gris et
Harvey
Herr in
Hirth
Hyde
Just
Mc Innis
Mc Whinne_y __
Miller
Parsons
Porter
Rogers
S.hipley
Sims
Smith
Wedaa
Winn
Hirs tein ---Allen
Mitchell ---Boyd
OTHE RS
Harper I
Brown
Sylveste r
Carlson
Clarke ---
Dunn
Finster
Galloway /
Ho hene r --.'14---___
Keith
Lowry
Maddox
Martinson--.L
Niss on ..I
Piersall
Sigler
Stevens
Hunt
Crabb
---
/V\j~~-
DIS TRICT 8
Mitchell
Boyd
Allen
Lewis
Bogard
Westra
Root
Magnus
Bousman
Dutton
Go mez
Ship ley
Herrin
Kan el
Gris et
Croul
Kroes en
Harper
Hirth
Coco
Hirth
Coen
Zuniga
Hileman
Machado
Schniepp
Allen
Phillips
Goldberg
Goldberg
Phillips
5; 00 .District No . -~7'------
Typ e of Meeting _n ............ rl~~-<+------
DISTRICT 1
Gris et
Miller
Po r ter
Allen
DISTRI CT 2
Herrin
Coco
Phill i ps
Just Harp er
Christie--Root
Clark __ Magnus
Cu l ver
Stephenson Dutton
F innell -Gomez
Herrin Gris et
S i ms
Sm i th
Wedaa
Wi nn
Allen
--
DISTRICT 3
Culver
Arb iso
Baum
Berton
Chri sti_e __
Clark
Davis
Stephenson
Green
Harvey
Herrin
Hyd e
Just
McWhinney-
Sims
Allen
DI STRICT 5
Parsons
Hirth
Allen
DISTRICT 6
Porter
Mc Innis
Allen
DISTRICT 7
Miller /
Gris et ./
Porte r ./
Rogers ./
Smith .;
Hirstein7
DISTRIC T 11
Zuniga
Hileman
Machado
Schni epp
Phillips
Lewis
Bogard
Westra
Root
Magnus
Bousman
Dutton
Shipley
Kanel
Gris et
Kroes en
Harper
Zuniga
Phillips
Croul
P hi llips
Hi r th
P hillips
Coco
Herrin
Hi rth ,
Hi l eman
Allen
Shipl ey Coen
Gibbs ----Allen Phillips