Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1970-12-22 klCOUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) December 18, 1970 TELE PH ON ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 Gentlemen: Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting on December 9, 1970, the Boa.rd of Directors of County Sanitation District No. '(, will meet in an adjourned regular meeting: JWS:gc rruesday, December 22, 1970 at 5:00 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue F'ountain Valley, California Note: The E:r.:ecutive Committee wl.11 meet at 5:30 p.,m.,, fol1owing the Distr5_et. Tfo. 7 meeting. II ~· ·~ P. 0 . Box 5 175 MANAGER 'S AGr:NDA R!EPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Californ ia 108 44 El li s Avenue Fou ntain Valley, Ca lif., 92708 Ta le phones : DISTRICT N0,_~7- De cembe r 18, 1970 ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING Tuesday , December 22 , 19f0 5:00 p .m. The items appearing on the enc l osed Agenda were deferred to this Adjourned Meeting from the Joint Board Meeting on December 9th . Nos. 6 and 7: These Agenda items re fer · to proposed Assessment Di strict No . 9 which requires the con -· struction of a Master Plan sub -trunk sewer i n Chapman Avenue, easterly of Santiago Boulevard . We have been advis ed by r epresentatives of the City of Orange that they have had some discussions with Mr . Frank Mea d, one of the major proponents for this project , and that the City is considering the construction of this sub- trunk sewer. We understand that additional information c oncerning this matter will be presented at the Tuesday me eting . FAH:hja .FJ.~ed A. Harper General Manager Area Code 714 5 40-2910 962 -2411 ,, .. l BO A~D S O F DmECT O RS County . Sa n ifo tion Di stricts P. 0. Bax 5 175 of Orange County, Cci fiforni3 10844 Ell is Avenu e Fo un tain Val ley, Cal ;~., 92708 -II fif ~ / ~ ~tr). (5) (6) ~ /. / (7 (~8) (9 ) Ro l l Ca.11 DISTR ICT No~ Adjourned Reg u lar Meeting December 22 , 1970 -5:00 p .m. AGENDA ADJOUR NMENTS POST E~ cow.P ~r~lliLEAG E ... J:. .. - FILE S :,~; UP .... V. .......... ~ / nE s:JtUfo):!S CERT IF IED .¥ LE TI :RS \'!~'.TTHI ............. .. • TE~ "/" 'l 'E l1l . ./"' MINU -> I •"' .v. ...... . MI NUTE S l-ILED .... ~ .... . Jo. Appointme nt of Chairman pro tern , if necessary I ,t - n ,~ .,w-/ (J f~ Iii.) .,:;f~· J Repo r t of the General Manage r ~J.. \, ff"_ Report of the General Counsel ?X~~t ~ Cons ideration of reque st of Jennings, Halderman and Hood,,,.1-"',¥"' .... , .''" J for ext~nsio:n of expiration de~te for existing non-master rr::;<,. f; vl"V"J plan Reimburseme nt Ag:r·eement No . 20 \ deferr~p. Jr~m p~ 1 { y.i .. 1 ., o Decemb e r 9th meet i ng ) See page 11 A1 I'~ ,!f;v[(,i ,_: 'i'<-G~,_,, ~ j.V~~~ lG a . Considerati.on of motion to receive , .. , l q' -ff )'t'·> ' and f i l e writ ten report of General Counsel ,,. i.~..,.../"'' o r elative to effect of subject r equested ~J extension of existing and f uture non-master plan reimbursement agreements . See page _'._'._~-- b . Consideration of action on subject r equest Agenda Item No. l / REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEERS JENNINGS· HALDERMAN· HOOD A CORPORATION 2001 EAST FOURTH STREET, SUITE 200, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92705 (714) 835-3611 3 NOVEMBER 1 970 HONORABLE BOARD OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No. 7 10844 ELLIS AVENUE P. O. Box 5175 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 ON NOVEMBER 10, 1965 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No. 7 ENTERED INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THIS ORGANIZATION (ACTING AS TRUSTEE) FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS OF SAN- ITARY SEWERS ON SIRRINE DRIVE IN THE COWAN HEIGHTS AREA OF ORANGE COUNTY. THE AGREEMENT STATED THAT THE DISTRICT WOULD REPAY THE PROPONENTS OF THE WALSH ANNEXATION A MAXIMUM OF $22,023.72 OVER A FIVE YEAR PERIOD. DURING THE ENSUING FIVE YEARS ONE REIMBURSEMENT OF $2,332.46 WAS MADE IN AUGUST OF 1966. A~ TRUSTEE FOR THE PARTIES TO THE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WE REQUEST THAT THE DISTRICT EXTEND THE LIFE OF THIS AGREEMENT FOR AN ADDITIONAL PERIOD OF TIME IN ORDER TO PERMIT A FAIR AND EQUITABLE REIMBURSEMENT OF THE COSTS OF THIS PUBLIC FACILITY TO THOSE WHO FINANCED ITS CONSTRUCTION. SUCH AN EXTENSION IS DESIRABLE, IN OUR OPINION, FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. TWENTY SIX LOTS WERE INCLUDED IN THE WALSH ANNEXATION, OF WHICH 22 CAN PHYSICALLY BE SERVED BY THE CONSTRUCTED FACILITY. THE ENTIRE COST OF THE ANNEXATION AND CONSTRUCTION WAS BORNE BY NINE PROPERTY O\./NERS. BECAUSE OF TOPOGRAPHY, IT WAS NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT NOT ONLY THE NORMAL GRAVITY . SEWER TO SERVE THE INDIVIDUAL LOTS, BUT TO CONSTRUCT A LIFT STATION AND A FORCE MAIN. 2. DURING THE LIFE OF THE PRESENT AGREEMENT A SINGLE REIMBURSEMENT, REPRESENT- ING APPROXIMATELY 10 PER CENT OF THE CONTRACT AMOUNT HAS BEEN RETURNED TO THE ORIGINAL PARTICIPANTS. WE BELIEVE THAT A PREMIUM OF $20,000 IS AN EXCESSIVE CHARGE UPON THOSE WHO UNDERTOOK THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS IMPROVE- MENT. ASSOCIATES: JF:-;oNINGs E:-rn. Co., Los Angele:;• JF.:-;:-;1:-;i;;;.l\IcDrn.:110TT & HE1:0-:s F.:-;c. Co., San Jose• JENXIXG~-HARTLETT & AssocIATES, Ventura Agenda. Item #5 A-1 District 7 ~ ! I HONORABLE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 3 NOVEMBER 1970 PAGE 2 3. ECONOMIC CONDITIONS HAVE RETARDED THE NORMAL DEVELOPMENT OF THIS AREA DURING THE LIFE OF THE AGREEMENT. WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THE DISTRICT EXTEND THE LIFE OF THIS AGREEMENT FOR. A PERIOD OF f 1ME WHICH SEEMS TO THEM TO BE APPROPRIATE IN ORDER TO PERMIT A FAIR AND EQUITABLE REIMBURSEMENT OF THE COSTS OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS FACILITY TO THOSE INDIVIDUALS AND FIRMS WHICH PARTICIPATED IN ITS ORIGINAL COST. ltc~-- HJrGH E. HALDERMAN HEH: J 1 cc: MR. WILLIAM J. CRAWFORD Agenda. Item 115 A-2 District 7 CLARK MILLER C. ARTHUR NISSON NELSON KOGLER H. LAWSON MEAD Agenda Item No. fn Y MILLER, NISSON S KOGLER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2014 NORTH BROADWAY SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706 December 8th 1 9 7 0 The Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 Legal Opinion re Extension of Reimbursement Agreement Term The original determination of the term (5 years) for the period of reimbursement for non-master plan sewerage facilities was an arbitrary determina- tion setting forth a policy that has generally been followed. No expiration date has been incorporated into those reimbursement agreements for sewerage facilities that have been accepted as a part of the District's Master Plan of Sub-trunk Sewers. There is no legal reason why non-master plan sewerage facility reimbursement agreements need have TELEPHONE: 542-6771 a termination date. The District does continue to collect extra fees from property owners who use such facilities, even though the reimbursement period may have expired. The practical reason why non-master plan reimbursement agreements have had a termination date is to eventually eliminate the extra bookkeeping and accounting required. It is believed that this is a valid reason for fixing a termination date on these agreements. In considering the granting of an extension of the term for non-master plan reimbursement agree- ments, you may consider adopting an automatic extension, an extension upon request, limit extensi~ns to cases where hardship can be shown, such as when the develop- ment costs have not been recovered in the sales of property, etc., or refuse all extensions of the term for such agreements. Agenda. Item #5a. B-1 District 7. The Board of Directors CSD #7 Page 2 -12.8.70 The effect of the general slowdown of con- struction and land development since the original five- year term policy was established may be considered. The charging of a small percent of the monies collected for reimbursements to defray district expenses in main- taining these agreements for a longer term may also be considered. In the final analysis, it is desirable to have a consistent policy but it is in no way mandatory. One decision is not really binding upon subsequent decisions. Each case may be considered on its own merits. When good reasons are shown policy should change. CAN:mjb Agenda Item #5a. Respectfully submitted, C. Arthur Nissan General Counsel B-2 District 7 PETITION OF PROPERTY OWNERS {Sec. 2804 -Streets and Highways Code) We, the undersigned, being the owners of property within the area of a proposed assessment district to be established under the 11 Improvement Act of 1911, 11 being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, or under 'the 11 Municipal Improvement ~ct of 1913,11 being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, do hereby petition the Honorable Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 to forthwith commence and carry through to completion under the provisions of said "Improvement Act of 1911" or said 11 Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 11 al I proceedings for the formation of a special assessment improvement district as hereinafter described and for the construction of the hereinafter mentioned improvements witnin the County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, and for the acquisitfon, under the provisions of Section 5102, or Section 10102, of the Streets and Highways Code, of all lands, right-of-ways and easements necessary in connection with said improvements. The area within the County Sanitation District No. 7, County of Orange, State of California, which we hereby request your Honorable Body to declare to be the special assessment improvement district, as hereinabove mentioned, is shown on a plat attached hereto entitled 11 Plat of Proposed Assessment District No. 9 for Jmprovement of Sanitary Sewers and Appurtenances in Chapman Avenue, 11 dated December 1, 1970, and on which plat the boundaries of said proposed assessment district are outlined. The improvements which we hereby request your Honorable Body to construct for the benefit of the property described within the above mentioned proposed improvement district are described as follows: Construction of sanitary sewers and appurtenances and a 11 appurtenant work in Chapman Avenue and ease- ments for sanitary sewer purposes. We, and each of us, hereby request said improvement proceedings and the acquisition of all lands, right-·of-ways and easements necessary in connection with improvements and do hereby waive, and request the County Sanitation District No. 7 to dispense with any and all proceedings all limitations under the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931, 11 being Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. This petition is fi I ed with you under and pursuant to the provisions of Section 2804 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California as amended, being a part of the "Special Assessment lnvesHgation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931. 11 This petition may be filed in counterpart and/or may be joined with other petitions or petition for similar work. SIGNATURE OF LANDOWNER .. /~.-> ; FP:·.NK F. Li.:.J.D . HENRY /'1. HOL'11~"1 ·. I ,I I .' . /"" 1':LVhhi\. A. EOL'l'Z / Agenda. Item #6 ADDRESS OF LANDOWNER 20,C02 E~ Ch~pr'..::·n Ave., Or~ne·e, C;:;:lif 0nl'i•:. 92669 093--150-2'? 093-173·-Cl 093-·173-02 .~-~-:-/. 1.'.1,:' ,,_ )' -/ : . ·. ... I·,•·" 093.~150-18 O:c~ngc, C:tlif • 093·-150-26 c DATE OF SIGNING Dec. 1, 1970 Dt"C. 1, 1970 /·, .· I /. -I'; ( I J I District 7 ENGINEERING 0 ENGINEERS e ARCH.ITECTS 412 SOUTH LYON STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHONE <714) 547-4471 ADDRESS REPLY TO P.O. BOX 178 December 7, 1970 County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley / CA 92708 Attention fvAtr. Fred A. Harper General Manager County Sanitation District No. 7 Proposed Assessment District No. 9 We have recently been retained by Mr. Frank Mead to prepare a petition for the formation of an assessment district under either 1911or1913 Act proceedings for the improvement of a sanitary sewer system to serve property owned by Nir. Mead and three other landowners as shown on the attached map. The proposed sewer would extend from the future extension of the Chapman Avenue Subtrunk to a point fronting on Mr. Mead's properly. Assuming that the petition is signed by the required majority of the landowners and that County San itai'i on District No. 7 agrees to sponsor this assessment district., we respectfully submit the following proposal to act as engineer of work in connection with this proposed Assessment District No. 9. The construction cost for this sewer is estimated to be approximately $45 1 000 for the estimated lengf·h of 3,400 feef· of sewer. The estimated total incidental expenses, exclusive of construction surveying and construction inspection, are $7 ,500. Engineering costs to prepare plans and specifications, proposed boundary map of di strict 1 and all work appurtenant thereto up to the time of award of contract under a 1911 Act proceeding will be $3,750. Engineering costs after award of contract and through the final public hearing under 1911 Act proceeding will be $1,250, making a tof·al engineering fee of $5,000. This figure is exclusive of right-of-way acquisition costs 1 clerical work in connection with mailing notices, blueprinting and other incidental expenses not covered under the engineering fee. If the 1913 Acf· proceedings are used, the entire engineering fee of $5r000 would be paid at time of bond sale. We therefore propose to furnish the following engineering services. PROFES~',IONAL ENGINEERING A N D ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES Agenda. Item #7 D-1 District 7 ""-""•' County Sanitation District No. 7 of OrangeCounty Mr. Fred A. Harper December 7, 1970 1 Page 2 1. Prepare preliminary engineering studies and design for review and approva I • 2. Prepare construction plans and specifications and furnish all necessary field work and all necessary office computations to assist in expediting field survey work necessary for design. 3. Prepare estimates of quantities and costs. 4. Assist district in securing bidsF tabulation and analysis of bid results and in letting of contract. 5. Furnish consultation and advice to district during construction and perform all du ti es customarily required of the Superintendent of Streets. 6. Review laboratory reports on material tests and inspections and correlate such reports with the intent of the plans and specifications. 7. Furnish periodic observations of construction work and progress and provide appropriate eports to district. 8. Furnish a final inspection and :eport of the complei-ed project with a representative of the district. 9. Prepare record drawings (as-constructed) when ·:Onstruction has been completed and accepted by distrid. 10. Deliver original tracings of plans and reproducible plates of specifications for district's use in preparing the necessary prints for record purposes and distribui'ion to prospective bidders. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Attend all public hearings in connection with the assessment district proceedings. Spread the assessment and prepare 1·hc assessment rol I and final diagram. Assist legal counsel in preparation of applicable portions of the resolution of intention and any modification resoluVions. Prepare a preliminary assessment spread for initial hearing on the resolution of intention. Post the line of v1ork in conformance wif·h the 1911or1913 Act proceedings. BOYLE ENGINEERING Agenda. Item #7 D-2 District 7 ~ County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County f'..Ar-. Fred A. Harper December 7 1 1970 Page 3 We propose to provide f'hese services for a lump sum fee of $5,000 of which $3, 750 covers that portion of the work in a 1911 Act proceedings up to and including the time the contract is awarded and shall be due and payable at that time. In the event of abandonment 1 we propose that the fee for engi- neering services be based upon the following per diem rates and shall not exceed $3,750 for a 1911 Act proceedings and $5,000 for a, 1913 Act proceedings. Senior Engineer $25. 50 an hour Associate Engineer $22 .50 an hour Assistant Engineer $19.00anhour Senior Draftsman $16.00 an hour Draftsman $13.50 an hour 3-tv\an Survey Party $50. 00 an hour Licensed Surveyor $19.50 an hour Clerical $ 8.00 an hour Blueprinting Cost p!us 25% In connection with field work after award of coni-ract, we propose that all work be perfonned in accordance with the following per diem rates. Residen1· Engineer Assistant Resident Engineer Inspector $22. 50 an hour $19.00 an hour $11.00 an hour With the exception of Assessment District No. 7, County Sanitation Disfrict No. 7 has underwritten all of the engineering and incidenf·al costs up to the time of award of contract under the 1911 Act proceedings. In the case of Assessment District No. 7, the property owners were required to deposit an amount which represented the estimated cost of preparation of plans and specifications, legal services and other incidental expenses to be incurred prior to the time of 1·hc award of i'he contract. BOYLE ENGINEEf~lf.!C.; A~ncl_a. Item __ 117 D-3 District 7 -------,-- County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County fv4.r. Fred A. Harper December 7 / 1970 Page 4 In the event the district does not underwrite these costs, it wi 11 be necessary for the proponents to deposit an amount for a 1911 Act proceedings as follows: Engineering fees Legal fees -75% of $1, 000 Printing, plans and specifications and legal notices $3,750 750 1, 100 $5,600 For a 1913 Act proceedings the deposit is estimated as fol lows: Engineering fees Legal fees Printing, plans and specifications and legal notices Miscellaneous $5,000 1,000 1,300 200 $7,500 Under either 1911 or 1913 Act proceedings, the deposit would be refunded to the depositer after a contract is awarded (l 91 l Act) or after a bond sale (1913 Act). Very truly yours, BOYLE ENGINEERING {:) /} 4 If () L-::.£_,e_.v er l!~ -!:/-~-~ Carf A. Carlson, C. E. 6654 pp Enc. Mr. Frank Mead 01-0199--00-00 BOYLE ENGINCERING Agenda. Item #7 D-4 District ''"'( DISTRICT NO. 7 MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED FEGULAR MEETING December 22, 1970 -5:00 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting held December 9, 1970, the Board of .Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present.- DIRECTORS PRESENT: DIRECTORS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Clifton C. Miller (Chairman), Lorin Griset, Ellis N. Porter, Howard Rogers, Don E. Smith and Wm. Hirstein None Fred A. Harper, General Manager, Paul Brown, Assistant General Manager and J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary Carl Carlson, Conrad Hohener, C. Arthur Nissan and Frank Meade * * * * * * * * Authorizing Amendment No. 1 to the Sirrine Drive Sewer and Pump Station Reimbursement Agreement No. 20 Pump Station Reimbursement ment Agreement No. 20), it Following a report by the General Manager on the request of Jennings, Halderman and Hood for a five year extension of the expiration date for the .Sirrine Drive Sewer and Agreement:: .. (Non-Master Plan Reimburse- was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the letter from Jennings, Halderman and Hood, dated November 3, 1970, requesting said extension be received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 70-178-7, approving Amendment No. 1 to the Sirrine Drive Sewer and Pump Station Reimbursement Agreement No. 20, granting an extension of the expiration date for a period of five years,. and providing for a 10% administrative charge to be deducted by the District from any reimbursements made during the five year extension period. Consideration of Petition The Board entered into a lengthy of Property owners re: discus·sion concerning the Petition proposed Assessment District of Property Owners for proposed ~. No .. g Assessment District No. 9 of approximately 75 acres in the Orange Park Acres area imJnediately adjacent to the Chapman Avenue grade. Director Smith stated that the City of Orange has under consideration the construction of a sewer in Chapman Avenue that would serve ·the proposed assessment district. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That, subject to deposit of cash or bond in the amount of $5,600 with the District by the proponents of the assessment district to cover incidental costs up to the ... v 1., t.ime of the award of contract for work, the Board of ,,.,\ ..... Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 will sponsor ··proposed Assessment District No. 9 to construct sanitary sewers and appurtenances to conform to the Master Plan of the District and connect to the sewer proposed to be constr.ucted in Chapman Avenue by the Cit;y of Orange. ·~-~ Accepting proposal of Moved, seconded and duly carried·: Boyle Engineering for engineering services That the proposal of Boyle relative to proposed Engineering, dated December 7, Assessment District No. 9 1970, for engineering services relative to .Proposed Assess·ment District No. 9, be approved ·and accepted; and that the General Manager be authorized to direct said engineers to.proceed with said work in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in said proposal for a basic fee not to exceed $5,000. Exchange of easements re: Contract No. 7-5-2 to an existing District Contract No. 7-5-2, and to the Board at a later on this matter. Adjournment The Districts' General Counsel reported on discussions concerning an exchange of easements relative easement on the West Trunk Sewer, advised that he would report back date following further discussion · Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman declared the meeting so adjourned at 5:37 ~.m., December 22nd. ATTEST: Secretary, Board of Directors County Sanitation District Noo 7 -2- Chairman, Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 Meeting Dat e I d J ~ ;;] / 7 0 Time JOI1'T'11 BOABDS Culve r Arbiso Baum Berton Christie Cl ark Davi s --- Stephenson Finne ll Gibbs Green Gris et Harvey Herr in Hirth Hyde Just Mc Innis Mc Whinne_y __ Miller Parsons Porter Rogers S.hipley Sims Smith Wedaa Winn Hirs tein ---Allen Mitchell ---Boyd OTHE RS Harper I Brown Sylveste r Carlson Clarke --- Dunn Finster Galloway / Ho hene r --.'14---___ Keith Lowry Maddox Martinson--.L Niss on ..I Piersall Sigler Stevens Hunt Crabb --- /V\j~~- DIS TRICT 8 Mitchell Boyd Allen Lewis Bogard Westra Root Magnus Bousman Dutton Go mez Ship ley Herrin Kan el Gris et Croul Kroes en Harper Hirth Coco Hirth Coen Zuniga Hileman Machado Schniepp Allen Phillips Goldberg Goldberg Phillips 5; 00 .District No . -~7'------­ Typ e of Meeting _n ............ rl~~-<+------­ DISTRICT 1 Gris et Miller Po r ter Allen DISTRI CT 2 Herrin Coco Phill i ps Just Harp er Christie--Root Clark __ Magnus Cu l ver Stephenson Dutton F innell -Gomez Herrin Gris et S i ms Sm i th Wedaa Wi nn Allen -- DISTRICT 3 Culver Arb iso Baum Berton Chri sti_e __ Clark Davis Stephenson Green Harvey Herrin Hyd e Just McWhinney- Sims Allen DI STRICT 5 Parsons Hirth Allen DISTRICT 6 Porter Mc Innis Allen DISTRICT 7 Miller / Gris et ./ Porte r ./ Rogers ./ Smith .; Hirstein7 DISTRIC T 11 Zuniga Hileman Machado Schni epp Phillips Lewis Bogard Westra Root Magnus Bousman Dutton Shipley Kanel Gris et Kroes en Harper Zuniga Phillips Croul P hi llips Hi r th P hillips Coco Herrin Hi rth , Hi l eman Allen Shipl ey Coen Gibbs ----Allen Phillips