The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1970-11-18 TELEPHONES: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS o = AREA CODE 714 S4O-2910 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 9 6 2-2 4 1 1COO P. ❑. BOX B127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9270B 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) November 13, 1970 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 Gentlemen: Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting on November 125 1_970, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District �r No. 7 will meet in an adjourned regl.l.lar meeting- Wednesday, November 18, 1970 at 4:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis k-:7enue Fountain Valley, California / /oecx e try JWS:ac Note: The Board. of District No. 2 will meet at 15": 30 p.m. following the Di str .ct. No. 7 rnect_ing. I� �~ Oc :sP3 ► F�`iea deryfiS IP i o1!nty sanitation Dic-tricts P. O. Box 5175 i 'y, Cal !08'—!' E!Iis A;venuc �f Cira,�'e Cour,, `�r`ceaiA Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 i t � No. — _�— AGENDA Nave-r.b e r 18, 1_970 - L: 30 p.m- pipe"Nmr.4 ;...... �16€§ III Ila ✓:,.,,, €§ol.url a!s c,rlfltlEn.r ( Roll Call L:LTTERS WRITTEN,,,,„ MINUTES WRITTEN„ (�/)�`$�1T1®-1.-�-t�lE��4.f_�.�18,1��-1`t-�—fei31;-isL'--i�P.G•e_S.S�-�-� MINUTES. �) Fe- Ort_Of_the -General-•Gouns-e-1 Verbal progress report of Engineer on design of racili , es / to be constructed under 1970 Bond Program a.w ��, n-L-,,,,J l �6) Consideration of written request dated November 3, 1970, from Jennings, Halderman and Hood, requesting an extension of expiration date of Reimbursement Agreement No. 20 (Not Master Plan) . See page "A" '7 Consideration of Resolution No. 70-164-7, approving / annexation of territory to the District (Annexation No. 23) , "Proposed Siri ine Drive. Annexation" . See page "B" M � .,� Consideration of Resolution No. 70-165-7, authorizing acceptance of Grwitsof Easement from Pihole Northridge, Inc. , in connection with sanitary sewers in Tract No. 6507 in the Peacocx H11.1 area. See p�,e "C'' �9 Consideration of. Resolution No. 70-166-7, approving and authorizing execution of a Sewerage Facility Reimbursement Agreement (Not Master Plaxi) with. Dr. Thomas A O ' Sul li,ran and Mr. Ellis Stanley. See page - "D" (10) Other business and communications, if any (11) Consideration of motion_ to adjourn QG), '4A' cr & 1-4 YA -�-� G _ 1YOCA, QA- Lit., YJIA, Lu� ,M, -z V c f \ REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEERS .� JENNINGS • HALDERMAN • HOOD A CORPORATION 2 0 0 1 EAST FOURTH STREET. SUITE 2 0 0 , S ANT A A N A , CALIFORNIA 9 2 7 0 6 ( 7 1 4 ) 8 3 6-3 6 1 1 3 NOVEMBER 1970 HONORABLE BOARD OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 10844 E_LIS AVENUE P. 0. Box 5175 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 ON NOVEMBER 10, 1965 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ND. 7 ENTERED INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THIS ORGANIZATION (ACTING AS TRUSTEE) FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS OF SAN— ITARY SEWERS ON SIRRINE DRIVE IN THE COWAN HEIGHTS AREA OF ORANGE COUNTY. THE AGREEMENT STATED THAT THE DISTRICT WOULD REPAY THE PROPONENTS OF THE WALSH ANNEXATION A MAXIMUM OF $22,023.72 OVER A FIVE YEAR PERIOD. DURING THE ENSUING FIVE YEARS ONE REIMBURSEMENT OF $2,332.46 WAS MADE IN AUGUST OF 1966. AS TRUSTEE FOR THE PARTIES TO THE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WE REQUEST THAT THE DISTRICT EXTEND THE LIFE OF THIS AGREEMENT FOR AN ADDITIONAL PERIOD OF '.TIME IN ORDER. TO PERMIT A FAIR AND EQUITABLE REIMBURSEMENT OF THE COSTS OF THIS PUBLIC FACILITY TO THOSE WHO FINANCED ITS CONSTRUCTION. SUCH AN EXTENSION IS DESIRABLE, IN OUR OPINION, FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1 . TWENTY SIX LOTS WERE INCLUDED IN THE WALSH ANNEXATION, OF WHICH 22 CAN PHYSICALLY BE SERVED BY THE CONSTRUCTED FACILITY. THE ENTIRE COST OF THE ANNEXATION AND CONSTRUCTION WAS BORNE BY NINE PROPERTY OWNERS. BECAUSE OF TOPOGRAPHY, IT WAS NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT NOT ONLY' THE NORMAL GRAVITY SEWER TO SERVE THE INDIVIDUAL LOTS, BUT TO CONSTRUCT A LIFT STATION AND A FORCE MAIN. 2. DURING THE LIFE OF THE PRESENT AGREEMENT A SINGLE REIMBURSEMENT, REPRESENT— ING APPROXIMATELY 10 PER CENT OF THE CONTRACT AMOUNT- HAS BEEN RETURNED TO THE ORIGINAL PARTICIPANTS. WE BELIEVE THAT A FREMIUM OF $20,000 IS AN EXCESSIVE CHARGE UPON THOSE WHO UNDERTOOK THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS IMPROVE— MENT. ASSOCIATES: JEN NINfs ENO.Co.,Los AngeIC9 JENNINGS-:11CDERM0TT&HEISs FNa.Co.,San Jose JENNINGS-EARTLF.TT b ASSOCIATES,Ventura enda Item #6 A-1 District 7 AIL r - Utl-ej 4A V I I HONORABLE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 3 NOVEMBER 1970 PAGE 2 3. ECONOMIC CONDITIONS HAVE RETARDED THE NORMAL DEVELOPMENT OF THIS AREA DURING THE LIFE OF THE AGREEMENT. WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THE DISTRICT EXTEND THE LIFE OF THIS AGREEMENT FOR A PERIOD OF TIME WHICH SEEMS TO THEM TO BE APPROPRIATE IN ORDER TO PERMIT A FAIR AND EQUITABLE REIMBURSEMENT OF THE COSTS OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS FACILITY TO THOSE INDIVIDUALS AND FIRMS WHICH PARTICIPATED IN ITS ORIGINAL COST. H GH5HALDERMAN HEH:ji CC: MR. WILLIAM J. CRAWFORD N"/ Agenda Item A-2 District 7 jvr" ou� ` V7 1 - U-. 4 RESOLUTION NO. 70-164-7 APPROVING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT Annexation No. 23 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF' DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT Nor PROPOSED SIRRINE DRIVE ANNEXATION TO ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 - ANNEXATION NO. 23" The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of territory to County Sanitation District No. 7, by means of a petition filed with said Commission by the property owners; and, Section 2. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Proposed Sirrine Drive Annexation No. 23 to County Sanitation District No. 7", the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and, Section 4. That the reason for annexing said territory is to provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and, Section 5. That annexation fees in the amount of $395. 20, ($260 per acre) , have been received by County Sanitation District No. 7; and, Section 6. That the General Manager be authorized to submit a request to the Orange County Board of Supervisors to annex said ..� territory to the 70th Sewer Maintenance District; and, Agenda Item #7 B-1 District 7 Section 7. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code, �.r Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described hereinabove, be and it is hereby ordered annexed to County Sanitation District No. 7. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting on November 18, 1970. Agenda Item #7 B-2 District 7 RESOLUTION N0. 70-165-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENTS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENTS FROM PINOLE NORTHRIDGE, INC. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That those certain Grants of Easement, dated October 7, 1970, wherein PINOLE NORTHRIDGE, INC. grants to County Sanitation District No. 7, permanent easements for sewer purposes relative to Tract 6507 in the Peacock Hill area; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easements are granted is more particularly described on Exhibits A,B,C, and D attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, ..i Section 3. That said Grants of Easement are accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to record said Grantsof Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held November 18, 1970. Agenda Item #8 -C- District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 70-166-7 APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT NOT MASTER PLAN A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ..i ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A SEWERAGE FACILITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (NOT MASTER PLAN) WITH DR. THOMAS A. O' SULLIVAN AND MR. ELLIS STANLEY The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, ' DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Sewerage Facility Reimbursement Agreement (Not Master Plan), between County Sanitation District No. 7, and DR. THOMAS A. O'SULLIVAN and MR. ELLIS STANLEY, providing for reimbursement by the District for 8" VCP sewer and manholes constructed in Sirrine Drive is hereby approved ..i and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District, in form acceptable to the General Counsel; and, Section 3. That reimbursement in the total amount of $15630.68 is hereby authorized to be made in accordance with the terms and conditions outlined in said agreement, from the Facilities Revolving Fund of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held November 18, 1970. Agenda Item #9 -D- District 7 1 11-18-70 3 :35 p•m. Fred, Art Nisson called. He says that Frank Mead will be attending the District No. 7 Board meeting with. Carl Carlson re : Formation of an A.D. Jean Meeting Date 11110,, Time District —7 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS Griset Herrin Culver Miller Coco Arbiso Lewis Porter _ Baum Hogard Allen Phillips Berton Westra Christie Root DISTRICT 2 Clark Magmas Davis Bousman Just Harper Stephenson Dutton Christie Root Finnell Gomez ,.,,61 ark Magnus Gibbs Culver Green Shipley Stephenson Dutton Griset Herrin Finnell Gomez Harvey Kanel Herrin Griset Herrin Griset Sims Zuniga Hirth _ Croul Smith Hileman Hyde Kroesen Wedaa Machado Just Harper Winn Schniepp McInnis Hirth Allen Phillips McWhinney Miller Coco DISTRICT 3 Parsons Culver Porter Arbiso Lewis Rogers Hirth Baum Hogard Shipley Coen Berton Westra Sims Zuniga Christie Root Smith Hileman Clark Magnus Wedaa Machado Davis Bousman Winn Schniepj Stephenson Dutton Hirstein Allen Green Shipley Allen Phillip: Harvey Kanel Herrin Griset Hyde Kroesen Mitchell Tust Harper Boyd Goldberg ,,,,cWhinney Sims Zuniga OTHERS Allen Phillips Harper DISTRICT 5 Brown Sylvester ,r Parsons Carlson Hirth Croul _ Clarke Allen Phillips Dunn Finster DISTRICT 6 Galloway Hohener -- Porter Hunt McInnis Hirth Keith Allen Phillips Lowry Maddox DISTRICT 7 4; 3 0 Martinson ►o-►�-� -t 10-t06 Nisson Miller ✓ Coco Piersall Griset Herrin Sigler �— Porter �- Stevens Rogers Hirth Crabb Smith Hileman Hirstein ✓ Allen RA ,DISTRICT 11 Shipley Coen Gibbs Allen Phillips DISTRICT 8 Boyd _ Goldberg Mitchell Allen Phillips 0 ORANGE COUNTY O U NTY O F ADMINISTRATION BUILDING P. O. BOX 838 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA I RAN Ca E TELEPHONE: 834-2239 AREA CODE 714 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION September 28, 1970 Orange County Sanitation District No. 7A P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHAIRMAN WILLIAM J. PHILLIPS SUPERVISOR Attn : clerk of the District THIRD DISTRICT VICE CHAIRMAN CHARLES A. PEARSON Gentlemen : REPRESENTATIVE OF GENERAL PUBLIC Pursuant to Section 56261 of the Government Code , the Local Agency Formation Commission will make determi- nation on the following proposal without notice and ALT hearing on October 14, 1970 at 2 :GO o ' SUPUPERVRVISORSOR clock P. M ' , FIFTH DISTRICT in Room 50j, Orange County Administration Building at I 515 North Sycamore Street , Santa Ana, California : proposed Sirrine Drive Annexation to Orange County STAN I ?THRUP Sanitation District No. 7. COUNCILMAN CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE LOUTS R. EINHARDT Under the authority y p of Bylaw No . 25 representatives of R COUNCILMAN cities and districts may be required by the Chairman of CITY OF FULLERTON the Commission at the time of the hearing to present , or to have previously filed , a resolution of the legislative body of the city or district authorizing such representa- ALTERNATE tives to appear on behalf of the district or city. ROBERTW. BATTIK SUPERVISOR Authorization may be for a specific proposal or, generally, FIRST DISTRICT for any proposal under consideration by the Commission. Very ruly yours , ALTERNATE O1� WILLIAM D. MARTIN REPRESENTATIVE OF GENERAL PUBLIC Richard T . Turner Executive Officer ALTERNATE A. J. COCO RTT/ih MAYOR CITY OF TUSTIN "-ORICHARD T. TURNER EXECUTIVE OFFICER ' AiYu"tpA, d✓""""1,� TELEPHONES: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS o AREA 2917014 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 9 6 2-2 41 1 P. O. BOX B127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 1OB44 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEG❑ FREEWAY) November 13, 1970 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 Gentlemen: Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting on November 12, 1970, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 will meet in an adjourned regular meeting: Wednesday, November 18, 1970 at 5:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Val-ley, California W etaryj ' i I JWS :gc Note : The Board of District No. 7 will meet at 4:30 p.m. , preceding the District No. 2 meeting. i County Sanitation DistUiets P. O. Box 5175 of Grange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 R �".1� 5 1 j � � . g AD,(pURNM November 18, 1970 - 5:30 P.M. Fotirr � ...rr�iEvii (1) Roll Call f'iEDTEN, (2) Appointment of Chairman pro tem, if necessary (3) Report of the General Manager (1I ) Repert of the General Counsel (5) Verbal progress report of Engineers on preparation of master plan of facilities and preliminary design work on the Santa kna River Ir.tPrcertor (6,) Discussion re: Engineer' s progress report Other business and communications, if any Consideration of motion to adjourn 1�P OL" tL�,kczkL ( 4��,,'LA -'�% Lr;:� C C. ,or, PC 0 ttAk.,j 4-c"6 cr a VC,ct' c 7 Z e c 9 /C r- c /LJL- Jt, �� 2 q I-If Meeting Date t ! Time Jr : jQ District CQ DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS Griset Herrin Culver Miller Coco Arbiso Lewis Porter Baum Hogard Allen Phillips Berton Westra Christie _ Root DISTRICT 2 '3� Clark Magnus Davis Bousman Just Harper Stephenson Dutton Christie 6- Root Finnell Gomez lark V/ Magnus Gibbs Culver ✓ Green Shipley Stephenson 0.- Dutton Griset Herrin Finnell ✓ Gomez Harvey Kanel Herrin ✓ Griset Herrin Griset Sims Zuniga Hirth Croul Smith ,/ Hileman _ Hyde Kroesen Wedaa a Machado Just Harper Winn Y Schniepp McInnis Hirth Allen ✓ Phillips McWhinney Miller Coco DISTRICT 3 - Parsons Culver Porter Arbiso Lewis Rogers Hirth Baum Hogard Shipley Coen Berton Westra _ Sims Zuniga Christie _ _ Root _ Smith Hileman Clark Magnus Wedaa Machado Davis Bousman _ Winn Schniepj Stephenson-- Dutton ^� ' Hirstein Allen Green Shipley Allen Phillip: Harvey Kernel _ Herrin Griset Hyde Kroesen Mitchell Just Harper Boyd GoldberE ^Whinney maims Zuniga _ OTHERS Allen Phillips Harper U. DISTRICT 5 Brown Sylvester Parsons Carlson Hirth Croul Clarke Allen Phillips Dunn ._ Finster DISTRICT 6 Galloway Hohener Porter Hunt v McInnis Hirth Keith Allen Phillips -� Lowry _ ✓ Maddox DISTRICT 7 Martinson Nisson Miller Coco Piersall Griset Herrin Sigler Porter - Stevens Rogers Hirth Crabb Smith Hileman Hi.-stein Allen. ISTRICT 11 Shipley Coen Gibbs Allen Phillips DISTRICT 8 Boyd Goldberg Mitchell Allen Phillips COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No. 2 SUMMARY OF LAND USE PROJECTIONS Zone Description Flow Total % of Total % of People in Area in Total Flow Total per Population % of Gal/Ac Zone Area in MGD Flow Acre in Zones Population 1. Low Density Housing 650 25,424 29.82 16.527 10.36 6 152,544 16.90 2. Med Density Housing 1,550 25,238 29.60 39.116 24.51 15 378,570 41.95 3. High Density Housing 3,880 2,687 3.15 10.424 6.53 37 99,419 11.02 4. High Density Housing 5,820 4,855 5.70 28.253 17.70 56 271,880 30.13 5. Commercial 3,230 5,981 7.02 19.313 12.10 - - - 6. Industrial 3,880 9,526 11.17 36.954 23.16 - - - 7. Recreational 190 3,123 3.66 .592 .37 - - - 8. Oil Production 1,000 8,418 9.88 8.418 5.27 - - - Totals 85,252 100.00% 159.597 100.00% 902,413 100.00% COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No. 2 MASTER PLAN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer With Riverside Without Project Limits County (50 mgd) Riverside County Total Orange Riverside Total Cost County County Plant 1 to Katella Avenue 8,161,000 5,758,000 2,403,000 7,258,000 Katella Avenue to 3,283,000 1,970,000 1,313,000 2,764,000 Riverside Fwy. Riverside Fwy. to 5,787,000 1,509,000 4,278,000 2,836,000 County Line Totals 17,231,000 9,237,000 7,994,000 12,857,000 Totals (From June, 1969 Report) 16,533,000 7,260,000 9,273,000 7,800,000 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No. 2 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED TRUNK SEWER FACILITIES Project Size Capacity Cost Inches mgd Santa Ana River 48-84 50-184 $12,900,000 Interceptor Sewer (9,300,000) * Yorba Linda Pump Station and Force Main 30 18 684,000 Palm Drive Interceptor 21-39 6.5-24.5 340,000 Carbon Canyon Trunk 33-60 35-39 1,274,000 South Santa Ana River Trunk 15-18 1.8-5.7 642,000 Richfield Interceptor 33 8.2 301,000 Orchard Interceptor 30 6.5 141,000 Kraemer Interceptor 18-21 3.4-5.0 256,000 Diversions to Euclid Trunk Existing Sewers 25,000 Orange Interceptor 27-42 12-20 110,000 Carbon Canyon Sub-Trunk 18-27 9.9-13 404,000 River Crossings 15-18 2.0-4.0 150,000 Rolling Hills Pump Station Expansion 4.0 Addition 50,000 West Street Interceptor 30-33 11-15 892,000 Olive Interceptor 30 12 364,000 Fairview Interceptor 24 20 157,000 Totals 18,690,000 (15,090,000) * with participation by Riverside County *..e COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No. 2 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM - Without Participation by Riverside County With Participation by Riverside County ( ) PROJECT TOTAL COST 71-72 72-73 73-74 74-75 80-81 85-86 (1) Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer Plant #1 to 7,300,000 3,650,000 3,650,000 Katella Ave (5,800,000) (2,900,000) (2,900,000) Katella Ave to 2,800,000 2,800,000 Riverside Fwy (2,000,000) (2,000,000) Riverside Fwy 2,800,000 2,800,000 to County Line (1,500,000) (1,500,000) SUB-TOTAL 12,900,000 (9,300,000) (2) Yorba Linda Pump Sta & Force Main 684,000 684,000 (3) Palm Drive Interceptor 340,000 340,000 (4) Carbon Canyon Trunk 1,274,000 1,274,000 (5) South Santa Ana River Trunk 642,000 642,000 (6) Richfield Interceptor 301,000 301,000 (7) Orchard Interceptor 141,000 141,000 (8) Kraemer Interceptor 256,000 256,000 (9) Diversions to Euclid Trunk 25,000 25,000 *400" (10) Orange Interceptor 110,000 110,000 (11) Carbon Canyon Sub-Trunk 404,000 404,000 (12) River Crossings 150,000 150,000 (13) Expansion of Rolling Hills Pump Station 50,000 50,000 (14) West St Interceptor 892,000 892,000 (15) Olive Interceptor 364,000 364,000 (16) Fairview Interceptor 157,000 157,000 TOTALS 18,690,000 3,650,000 3,650,000 5,098,000 4,165,000 714,000 1,413,000 (15,090,000) (2,900,000) (2,900,000) (4,298,000) (2,865,000) (714,000) (1,4139000) NOTE: All costs based on 1970-71 price level. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No. 2 Basis for Annexation Fees Total. District Fixed Assets - Collect' n�System\- 12,524,000 District Equity - Joint Works !- 10,782,000 Total Present Fixed Assets ��s, = 23,306,000 Future collection system expenditures = 18,511,000 Future Capacity needed in Joint works - 118 mgd Cost: 118 x 1/5 $1,815,000 (per Riverside Agreement) = 42,834,000 Total $84,651,000 Present District Area - 62,330 Ac Area Outside of District - 25,813 Ac Total Study Area - 88,143 Ac �tD Annexation Fee = $84,651,000 88,143 Ac r.r j $960 per Acre - / < G- 07