The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1970-07-28COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX Bl 27, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE [EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAYJ July 24, 1970 'I10: !'fl.EMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION TELE PH ON ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 ~~---D_I_S_~RICT~K-'0_. ___ 7 __ ~~--~---~~--~-----~---~~---~~---~ Gentlemen: Pursuant to adjourrnnent of the adjourned meeting held July 14-, 1970, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District · No. 7 will mc::et in an adjourned regular meeting: JWS:gc Tuesday, J 1..ily 28 _, 1970 at 4:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE [EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAYJ Gentlemen: Tuesday, 1-~: 30 p .m., July 28 ~ 1970 1081-~4 E11i s A.venue Fountain VaJley, Califor~ia TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 I am calling a special meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation Di.strict No. 1 at the abov(:; hour and elate to consider the following items: JWS:gc a. Request of G. B. Cocke, Contractor on Rehabllitatj_on of Headworks 'B' at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-5R-l, to rescind his bid. b o Authorizing John Carollo Engineers to redes.2.gn Job No. P2-5R-l. c. Consider RE~scJ.u tion No. ~(0-114-1 au th·-Jri:-:,i.ng re-advertising for bids for Job No. P2-5R-l. c hai rmari·-----------···- II MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California DISTRICT NO. District No . 1 -Special Meeting District No. 7 -Adjourned Meet ing Tuesday, July 28, 1 970 . 4 :30 p .m. 10844 t:llis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 · T elephone·s: Area Code 714 540-29 10 · 962-2411 July 24, 1970 ·The following is a brief explanation of the items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. District No. 7 No. 5 -AWARD OF SALE OF BONDS: Hopefully, the resolution appearing .on the agenda can be adopted awarding sale of bonds for the best bid received at 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, in the County Treasurer's . office. We are advised that several public agencies have been able to market · bonds in the past few weeks below the statutory seven percent interest maximum. No·. 6 -PRINTING OF BONDS: Assuming the bond sale is successful, it will be nec essary 'to arrange for printing of the bonds. The staff has solicited a proposal from Jeffries Banknote Company, of Los Angeles, which will be available at the meeting. No. 7 -PROPOSAL FOR SOILS INVESTIGATION -SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR: ·The design eng ineers have recow.mended that Moore & Ta be r, of Anaheim, be employed to conduct necessary foundation investigations for this project. The staff therefore r ecommends that the proposal of this · firm, attached to the agenda, be adopted. District No. 1 This special meeting has been called by the Chairman at the request of the General Counsel to consider Item No. 9 and the follow- ing itemq on the agenda . We are hop e ful that sufficient information will b e presented to enab l e the Board to make the necess a ry decisions sinc e this project is urgently needed and further delay could seriously jeopardize the safety of the structure involved and of personnel wo~king in the area. No. 9 -REQUEST OF CONTRACTOR FOR RE CI SS ION OF BID: The pirectors will recall that at the July 8 Board meeting a contract for Plant Job No. P2 -5R -l, Rehabilit a tion of Headworks 'B' at Pl ant No. 2, was awarded to G. B. Cooke at his low bid of $87 ,052 . There was only one other bid submitted ($266,000). The engineer's estimate was $6.o,ooo. Six days after award we received a communication from the contractor's attorney asking that he be relieved of his contract on the basis of an error in totaling his bid. The omission was stated to amount to $24,ooo . A copy of the contractor's attorneys' l etter is attached to the agenda , together with a letter from our General Counsel analyzing the situation and recommending a course of action. It is expected that the contractor and his attorney wi ll also be present at the meeting . A representative of John Carollo Engineers, who designed this project, will be in attendance and will present a brief verbal r eport of their investigation into the contractor's bid. Nos.'10 and 11 -REDESIGN AND READVERTISE JOB NO . P2 -5R-l: Because of the above -described urgency in completing thi s project and r egardless of the Board's decision on the request for bid recission, we are r ecomme nding that we proc eed immediately to readvertise the project for bids with the scope considerab l y reduced to the most essential portions of the work . We have discussed this matter with the de sign enginee r s and they feel that the re duced scope of the job can still be finished prior to the rainy season if it is imm ediately redesig n ed and a contract awarded by mid-August . We are therefore rec ormaending the actions indic ated on the a genda unde r these items . -2- Fred A. Harper General Mana ge r - Meeting Date JOI NT BOARDS CuJ.ver Arbiso Baum Re rt on Christie Clark Davis Dutton Finnell Gibbs Gre en Gris et Ha:rvey Herrin Hirth Hyde Just --- ----·•. .Mc Innis McWhinne _y __ Mill er Pars ons Porter Rog ers Shipley Sims Smith Wedaa Winn Hirstein ---Allen Mitchell ---Boyd o·rHE RS Harper ..,,.,,., Brown ./" Sylvester _, Carlson Clarke Dunn F inster Gall oway ---Hohene r ...--- Keith Low ry Maddox Martin son Niss on .._.,,, Pier sall ---Sigler __ _ Stevens Tremblay Crabb --- -------- DISTRICT 8 .Mitche ll BcyC. A1 len 7/8/70 gc Lewis Hoga.rd We s tr2. Root Magnus Bousman Pebley Gomez Shipley Herrin Kanel Griset Croul Kroes en Harper Hirth Coco Hirth Coen Zuniga Hileman Machado Schniepp Allen Phillips Goldb erg 0~1,:n ... ~~-u v..L u..u c.....1. b Phillips Time District No . ~ Type of Meeting DISTRI CT 1 es o . /·11t ·I . .e~ ±set:: .. V' Herrin (~~ Mi lle r ---.; Coco Porte r l'N .A..lle n ~ Phillips -- DISTRICT 2 Just Harper Chris t:Le ___ Root Cl a,rk ·Magnus ---Culver Dutton Pebley Finnell Gomez --Her rin Gris et Sims Zuniga Smith Hil eman --Wedaa Machado Winn Schniepp Allen Phill:Lps -- DISTRICT J . Culver Arbis o Lewis Ba.um Hogard ---Berton Westra Christi_e __ Root Clark Magnus Davis Bousman Dutton Pebley --Green Shipl e y --Harvey --Kanel Herrin Gris et --Hyde Kroes en Just Harper Mc Whinney-· Sims --Zuniga Allen Phillips DISTRICT 5 Parsons Hirth Cr oul Allen Phillips DISTRICT 6 Porter --Mc Innis Hirth Allen Phillips I DISTRICT 7 ~ 1o-,,1-1 a.,._J_, Miller .... Coco --Herrin v Porter --? Q. Rogers -----;;;-Hir th Smith "" Hileman Hirstein_Z Allen DISTRICT 1 1 Shipley __ Coen Gibbs All en --Phj_llips . . 11~ BO.ARDS O f DIRECTORS jj Cou nf \.' San1 fo tio n Dishl ds P. 0 . Box 5 175 !! of Orang e Cou nty, California l l 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountai n Valley, Cal i f., 92{08 JI DI STRIC T No. (1 ) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7 ) /') AG ENDA District No. 1 -Sp e cial Meeting District No . 7 -Adjourne d Regul ar Meeting 4 : 30 p . m. , ,July 28, .1970 Roll Call Appointments of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary Report of the General Manager Rep ort of the General Counsel DISTRICT 7 Con-s i deration of motj_on to rec e ive and file bid tabulat -Lon / and recommendation of the Director of F1nance re : $3 .5 mil l ion bond sale . See pages 11 A11 a n d __ 1 1 13~---- DISTRICT 7 Consl.deration of Resolution No . 70 --113-7, awarding sale of $3 .5 million in bonds to United Calif: Bar...k r ejecting all other bids , and directing the return of checks accompanying said rejected bids . See page -~'c '_' _ DISTRICT 7 Cons i deration of motion a u thoriz i ng the General Manager to award printing of b onds a..,v:id coupons r elatl.ve to , $3 .5 million bond sale to Jeffries Bank note Company AAS i n the amount of $450 . 00 for pr int ing p l us an additional r· charge of $20 .00 for eachj-nterest r9.te~ver one; plus tax . See page 11 D'1 ':f> . .61u /( 1.c\ ~ 'C c.. 7} DISTRICT 7 Con.siderati on of moticn accepting proposal of Moore & Taber for so il investigation for the Sunflowe r Intercep tor Sewer, Contracts Nos. 7 -6 -1 a r.d 7 -6-2 , for a maximum am01.;.nt not to exceed $7, 7:'..0 . 00 as f ollows : Contract No . 7-6-1 Contract No . 7-6-2 $ 6 ,060 .00 1 ~650 .00 and authorizing the General Manag er to d :Lr e ct said firm to proc e ed with the soi.1 j_nvestlgatirn 1. Se e . H E ii page _:__" __ _ DISTRICT 7 Gtl1 e r -bu s i n e ss a nd commu.nic a.t:L ons (11) (12) (13) (14) DISTRIC'l1 1 Consideration of request of G. on Rehabilitation of Headworks Job No. P2-5R-l B. Cooke, Contractor 11 jf 'B' at Plant No. 2, ~ fd'J' (i) a. Consideration of motion to receive and /' }....,,.... ( file letters from Monteleone & McCrory, l,01':' ~~~JD! attorneys for G. B. Cooke, Contractor, and /Ou" _ c. Arthur Nisson, District's Legal Counsel, ~,,..,,-.It ~ relative to contractor's request to rescind \......:/ his bid on Job No. P2-5R-l. See pages r _A(1'f "F" ~d ... " " • 0 ,,. · (})~~~ . ~~~ b. Verba report of John Carollo Engineers relative to bids on Job No. P2-5R-l -~ y.-~ Consideration of action on the request ~rP" ~of Go B. Cooke, Contractor on Job No. P2-5R-l, tr to rescind his bid· DISTRICT 1 ,~ Consideration of motion authorizing John Carollo /A . E~,r~r~~~~n ~oUo·-~Rjt 2 s--. tt ti DISTRICT 1 . u {) ~--OJ{,,, Consideration of Resolution No. 70-114-1, authorizing ~' / re-advertising for bids for Job No. P2-5R-l (Revised ~ for Rebid); and authorizing the General Manager to award contract for said work. See page "H" DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 7 7 ·./:'j' Consideration of motion to adjourn - I _, s:.10 . . ·. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 5175 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 July 28, 1970 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 Re: Orange County Sanitation District No. 7, 1970 Sewer Bonds, Series A We have figured the bids presented for the purchase of the $3.5 million Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 1970 Sewer Bonds, Series A, and find that the bid of United California Bank and Associates will result in the least cost to the District as shown on the attached tabulation. It is recommended that the sale of said bonds be awarded to United California Bank and Associates as the best bidder. JWS:gc Attachment Agenda Item 5 A ~-Di.strict 7 ...,,., July 28, l970 BID TABULATION ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 l970 Bank United California Bank and Associates 7 % on $675,000.00 6.50% on 150,000.00 6.00% on 350,000.00 6.10% on 200,000.00 6.20% on 200,000oOO 6.30% on 225,000oOO 6.40% on 250,000.00 6.50% on 525,000.00 6.60% on 600,000.00 6070% on 325,000.00 Security Pacific 7 % on $525,000.00 6 % on 650,000oOO 6050% on 875,000.00 6.60% on 250,000oOO 6070% on 275,000.00 6.75% on 925,000.00 Bank of America 7 % on $675,000.00 6.50% on 150,000.00 6.00% on 175,000.00 6010% on 175,000.00 6020% on 200,000.00 6.30% on 200,000.00 6.40% on 225,000oOO 6050% on 250,000.00 6060% on 250,000.00 6.70% on 120,000.00 Agenda Item 5 SEWER BONDS, SERIES A Interest $ 232,750.00 78,000.00 199,500.00 134,200.00 148,800.00 184,275.00 224,000.00 529,750.00 693,000.00 413:_725.00 $2,838,000.00 $ 159,250.00 334,500.00 716,625.00 247,500.00 294,800.00 121252562.50 $2,878,237050 $ 232,750.00 . 78,000.00 94,500.00 106,750.00 136,400.00 151,200000 187,200.00 227,500.00 247,500.00 1 2 L~l2 2 025. 00 $2,873,825.00 f) ~- Premium Net $417.00 $2,837,583.00 $665.00 $2,877,572.50 $1,192025 $2, 872_, 632. 75 District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 70-113-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING $3,5000,000 BONDS OF SAID DISTRICT TO THE BEST BIDDER AND REJECTING ALL OTHER BIDS * * * * * * * WHEREAS, at the time and place fixed for the opening of bids ' for the $3,500,000 bonds of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, designated Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 1970 Sewer Bonds, Series A, ·all bids were publicly opened, examined and read, and a tabulation thereof has been entered in the minutes; and, WHEREAS, The bid of the bidder hereinafter named is the best bid made by a responsible bidder for said bonds; NOW THEREFORE, The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, does hereby RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows: Section 1. That the bid of UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK AND -· ASSOCIATES offering par, accrued interest to date of delivery and .·a premium of $417.00 for said bonds to bear interest payable annually the first year and semia..nnually thereafter at the rates.of: Rates Years 7.00 % . 1971 through 1977 6.50 % 1978 6.oo % 1979 thr:ough 1980 6.10 .% 1981 6.20 % 1982 6.30 % 1983 6.40 % 198l~ 6.50 % 1985 through 1986 6.60 % 1987 through 1988 6.70 % 1989 Agenda Item 6 C-1 District 7 ~s the.bid fo~ said bonds yielding the lowest net interest cost. Said bid is hereby accepted and the bonds awarded to said best bidder in accordance with the terms 'of the proposals. Section 2. That all bids other than the one accepted in ._,,,,, Section 1 hereof are rejected and the Secretary of the District is · directed to return the check accompanying said rejected bids to the respec~ive bidders. Section 3. That the interest rates on said bonds are hereby fixed at the rates stated in Section 1 hereof. Section 4. The County Treasurer of Orange County is hereby directed to deliver said bonds to the successful bidder upon the payment of par, accrued interest to date of d~livery and the premium above stated. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a adjourned regular meeting held July 28, 1970. Agenda Item 6 C-2 District 7 JEFFRIES BANKNOTE COMPANY County Sanitation District Orange County p; o: Box 8127 1330 West Pico Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90015 Financial Printers & Securities Engravers Telephone (213) 746-1611 Cable Address JEBACO July 241 197 0 Fountain Valley, California 92708 · Dear Mr 0 Sylester: In answer to your letter of July 22, requesting a bid on 300 County Sanitati9n District No, 7 bonds 1 we submit a quotation of $450. 00 for printing the issue plus an additional charge of $20G·oo for each interest rate over oneo In the past we have printed your County Sanitation Districts bonds including your 1911 act bondsG Enclosed is a specimen of your last issueG Being the only bank note company in this area and being near your attorneys we believe we can offer bet·ter service than Eastern companiesci We trust that you will find this off er satisfactory and that after the bonds are printed that delivery to the underwriters can be made at our plantQ Very truly yours, ~~i-J*j_~ · Vice President "{/ LLJ:nw SINCE 1894 · 75 YEARS OF DISTINCTIVE GRAPHICS Agenda Item 7_ -D-District 7 .... ~-... -· ·-:-...... ROUTE TO: M 0 0 RE & TAB E R CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS 4530 EAST LA PALMA AVENUE • ANAHEIM, CALIF'ORNIA 92806 • (714) 524-3350 OTHC~ OFFICES: WOODLAND MILLS ' WEST SACRAMENTO SANTA ROSA County Sanitation District No. 7 c/o Mr. Conrad Hohener, Jr. Boyle Engineering P. 0. Box 178 Santa Ana, California 92702 SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR SEWER July 13, 1970 Pr~posal No. 70-152 As requested by Mr. Conrad Hohener, we would like to present the following proposal to conduct a soil investigation for the Sunflower Interceptor sewer, which wi 11 be constructed. under two contracts. The first contract (#7-6-1) wi 11 extend from the Orange County Sanitation Di strkt Treatment Plant No. 1 along Sunflower Street to Raitt Street. The second contract (#7~6-2) will extend from this point to Main Street. The investigation would include exploration, field and laboratory testing, data analysis, and soil mechanic recommendations for project design. Approx- imately fifteen {15) borings would be drilled along the sewer alignment within the limits of the first contract and approximately seven (7) within the limits of the second contract. Observation of ground water seepage would be made in all borings, and pipe would be installed in some of the borings to facilitate future ground water observations. Undisturbed samples would be obtained from all of the borings for purposes of determining classification, unit soil weight, strength, sand equivalent, and other pertinent characteristics of the soil. The entire investigation would be conducted under the supervision of an experienced engineering geologist or soil engineer. Based on engineering analysis of the field and laboratory data, a written report would be furnished summarizing the field and laboratory data and presenting soil recommendations for project design. Included would be recommendations for bedding and backfill, trench stability, allowable bearing pressure, active and passive lateral soil pressures, and other soil recommen- dations be 1 i eved to be pertinent to the. project • . The investigation as outlined above could be conducted for the following fees: jl~\ Contract No. 7-6-1 Contract No. 7-6-2 $ 6,060.00 1,650.00 ~enda Item 8 E -1 County Sanitation Dist. c/o Mr. Conrad Hohener, Jr. -2-July 13, 1970 The above fees also include provision for several conferences with the design engineer after completion of the field investigation and prior to construction. These fees do not include ahy inspection work during con- struction. The investigation on both contracts could be completed in six to eight weeks after authorization is received. We appreciate your consideration of our firm and hope we can be of service on this project. MOORE & TABER y-~ \&~-i~-~'- R. F. Moore President vc STEPHEN MONTELEONE (1886-l!i62) CARRELL ~ McCRORY CAVIO P, YAFFE STANTON P. BELLAND WILMER E. WINDHAM G.R-OBERT HALE ALAN P. RI BAKOF'F PATRICK .J. DUFFY m MoNTELEO~E & McCRORY SUITE 1912 L.EE TOWER 5455 WILSHIRE: BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90036 July 14, 1970 Board of Directors county sanitation District No. 1 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: Re: Rehabilitation of Headworks 'B' at Plant NO. 2; Job NO. P2-5R-l on or about July 1, 1970, our client G. B. Cooke submitted a bid for construction of the above- referenced project. TELEPHONE WEBSTER 7-1533 CRESTVIEW 4-6106 After submittal of the bid and because of the large difference in amount of the other bid, our client reviewed his bid but did not discover any mistake. However, at the request of his bonding company, our client rechecked his bid and last night discovered that he did make a mistake in his bid in the sum of $24,000.00. The bid was prepared on a series of worksheets which segregated the construction required into various items of work. On the reverse side of one of the work-_ sheets our client had estimated a price of $24,000.00 for the work of dewatering and removal of loose concrete. In preparing a surrunary of the various items set forth on the worksheets, Mr. Cooke through clerical error missed the worksheet for the work of dewatering and removal of loose concrete and, consequently, his bid did not include the $24,000.00 which he intended to be included in his lump sum price. The original worksheets which reflect the clerical error which was made are in the possession of this office and will be made available to the District or its representatives for inspection upon request. In view of the material mistake in bid, our client must and hereby does rescind his bid and respectfully requests that his bid bond be released. Agenda ItefQ___lQa F~-1 District 1 Board of.Directors July 14, 1970 Page Two If you require any additional informatj.on or assistance with respect to this matter, please feel free to contact the undersigned. GRH:jp F-2 Very truly yours, MONTELEONE & McCRORY By~)A--+--"--"". /D h~l~v"'----L G. ~HALE' District l CLARK MILL.ER C.ARTHUR NISSON NELSON KOGLER MILLER, NISSON 8 KOGLER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2014 NORTH BROADWAY SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706 July 24, 1970 Board of Directors of County Sanitation District #1 Orange County Gentlemen: Re: Rehabilitation of Headworks "B" at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2-5-R-l Bid of G. B. Cooke TELEPHONE !542-6771 The question as to whether or not Mr. Cooke should be allowed to rescind his bid does not have a simple answer. ·The known facts are: 1. The bid was r~gular on its face. 2. The bid was in excess of the engineer's cost estimate and it was lower than the other bid. 3. The second bid was unrealistic and not competi- tive. 4. A staff conference with Mr. Cooke was held after the bid opening and he re-affirmed his bid and claimed no errors. 5. The contract was awarded about a week later on July 8, 1970, and the contract documents were sent to Mr. Cooke. 6. On July 14, 1970, Mr. Cooke, through his attorneys, attempted to rescind his bid, claiming to have omitted a vital ~lement of the costs estimated for this work. The law applicable in this situation is summarized as follows: G. -1 District 1 ----------·--. Board of Directors Page Two July 24,. 1970 Where a bidder makes a mistake as to facts in compiling a bid, i.e., omitted to include a proper figure in his bid total, he can properly rescind his bid if he does so in a timely manner and before he is awarded the contract, unless at the time of the award of the contract the awarding agency knew of the claimed error and awarded it any way. A mistake of judgment, i.e., discretionary with contractor, is not ground for rescission unless such mistake has been in some way induced or contributed to by the awarding agency or its engineers. The problems before the District are: first, the untimeliness of the rescission, i.e., after the award, and secondly, is the claimed error one of fact or judgment. The following factors must be considered in seeking an answer to the second question: The job is principally a repair job and only two subcontractors were intended to be used by the bidder. The items claimed to have been omitted were factors inherent in the work to be done, and may have been included in other items.of costs included in the total bid as originally submitted. The engineer's estimate and the valuation of the bid, the method of bidding and the engineer's opinion. The ultimate question seems to be, did Mr. Cooke actually omit th~ $24,000 claimed or was this an after thought. The action to be taken is either to accept the rescission or to decline to allow the contract to be rescinded. If rescinded, work must be done by force account or re-bid. Mr. Cooke is liable for costs of re-bidding, including special meetings and all items of cost relating thereto. If rescission is not allowed, Mr. Cooke and his G'-2 D1str:i.ct l Page Three July 24, 1970 bid bondsman must be held liable. A lawsuit will probably ensue. It is'difficult to estimate the costs thereof. One other factor should be considered, and that is the state of the law with reference to public bidding of public works. The trend of the decisions has been to erode the rights of public agencies to hold contractors to their bids. However, there is no case that I am aware of where a contractor has been allowed to rescind the bid that was not clearly based upon a factual mistake after the contract had been awarded by the agency which was not ·aware of any error in the bid. I have advised Mr. Cooke and his attorney to be present for the purpose of presenting the matter to you at your meeting on July 28th, at which time a decision should be reached. CAN:cp j\genda IteI!l_+oa.. Respectfully submitted, C. Arthur Nissan General Counsel G'-3 Dl::.tr:i.ct 1 -~----- RESOLUTION NO. 70-114-1 AUTHORIZING ADVERTISING FOR BIDS FOR JOB NO. P2-5R-l (REVISED FOR REBID) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHOR- IZING RE-ADVERTISING FOR BIDS FOR REHABILITATION OF HEADWORKS 'B' AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-5R-l (REVISED FOR REBID) * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the General Manager be authorized to re-advertise for bids for Rehabilitation of Headworks 'B' at Plant No. 2, -Job Noo P2-5R-l (Revised for Rebid); and Section 2. That said bids will be received in the office of the Secretary of the District until 4:00 p.m., August 14, 1970, at which time they will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 3. That the General Manager is hereby authorized to award a contract for said work on behalf of the Board of Directors; and, Section 4. That the General Manager and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized to execute the contract for said work upon award by the General Manager. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held July 28, 1970. Agenda Item 12 -H-Distr:Lct 1