Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1970-06-30·COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE [EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAYJ June 26, 1970 TELEPHDN ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 Gentlemen: Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting on June 10, 1970, the Boa.rd of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 will meet in an adjourned regular meeting: Tuesday, June 30, 1970 at 6:00 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California The meeting is scheduled t_o begin at 6: 00 p .m., and a light supper wil1 be served at that time .. ~ 4_ ~aA-1'.J/.,V <?'~ A. Ha:fper I General Manager I I • ·-.., II MAN AG ER'S AG ENDA REP O RT County Sanita tion Di st ric ts of Orange County, California DISTRICT NO. 2 Adjourned Regular Meeting Tuesday, June 30, 1970 6:00 p.m.* P. 0. Box 5 175 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Ca li f., 92708 Telephones: A re8 Code 714 540-2910 962 -2411 June 26, 1970 The following is a brief explana tion of the items which appear on t he enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory . * * * * * * * * * * * No. 4 -PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT: It will be recalle d that at the June 10 Board meeting, Chairman Just sugg ested that the Board adjourn to this hour and date to consider pre liminary informa tion concerning the District's capital outla y needs for the coming five y ears . A d etermination by the Board as to t hese ne eds and t heir financing is n e c essary for preparation o f the District 's budget for the coming fiscal year. In order to present to the Directors, many of wh om are new to the Board, a brief summary of the District 's needs with r egar d to trunk and subtrunk sewers, Chairman Just sugges ted that the staff r equest Lowry and Associates, who h a v e been the D:Lstrict 's engineers for a n umber of ye ars , to prep are a brief pre liminary report out - l ining the faci l ities needed . This r ep ort i s enclosed and i s , we be l ieve, self-explanatory . Howev er because of the potential parti- cipation by Riverside County interests in the major facility needed (Santa Ana River Interceptor Trunk Sewe r), two separate construction programs are presented (Tab les 1 and 2 of the report), one assuming no participation by Riv ers ide County and the othe r assuming that the r e cently executed agreeme nts with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District will b e implement e d . Although the r ep ort clearly sets forth the r equi red cons truction n e.eds of the District that are now apparent, r epresentatives of Lowry and Associate s will b e present to answer any questions the Di rectors ma y h ave and to go into more d e t ai l regarding the many ramifications of thi s subject. ·X·NOTE : A light supper w:Lll be served at 6 :00 p .m. No . 5 -REPORT ON FINANCING OF FACILITIES DESCRIBED IN PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT : Chairman Just h as also suggested tha t the staff prepare for this meeting a brief report showing the financial c apabilities of the District to finance the needed facilit ies , with and without participation by Riverside County . This summ a ry report is also enclosed and consists of two schedules showing the cash flow position of the District for the next five years . The Director of Fi nance has prepared these schedules and will be present to g o into greater detai l, if desired (see also Item No . 6). No . 6 -AUTHORIZATION TO PLAN INCREASE IN DISTRICT 'S TAX RATE : Examination of t he material prepared by the Director of Finance (I tem No . 5) l eads to t he obvious conclusion that i f the needed facilities are to be constructed within the time l imit required, additional r evenue will be needed . In t h e event Riverside County participates in the project, new revenue equivalent to an average increase of 2¢: i n the District 's tax rate (now $O.L~261) wi l l be nec essary . Distri.ct No . 3, last year, increased its tax rate by 6¢ for similar reasons . In the event participation by Riverside County does not materialize, new revenue equival ent to 10¢ average increase in the tax r a te will be necessary . Since , at t his time participation by Riverside County cannot be definitely determined, the staff suggests that authoriz ation be given to plan to increase the tax rate 6¢ f or the coming fiscal year with a re -evaluati on of the matter at the end of 1970-71 when it will b e definitely knovm whether or not Riverside County wi l l participate and the master plan (Item No . 7 ) will be ·available . No . 7 -INITIATION OF FURTHER ENGINEERING STUDIES : Th e engineer 's report, con sidered under Item No . 4, recommends that immediate further studies b e c ow.menced in order to meet the critical deadlines facing the District . The first of these studies would be a pre liminary d es i gn study for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sew e r, as described on Page ~~ of the enclos ed eng ineer 1 s r eport , and the second , the preparation of an ultimate master plan for the District wj_thin the next four months . Similar master plans h ave been prepar e d and approved i n Districts Nos . 1, 3, 5, and 7 . It is the staff 1s recommenda tion tha t the engineers be directed t o submit proposals for this work for cons:Lderation and action at the July Joint Board meetin g . Paul G. Brown Assistant General Manager -2- ij II .I II II ~ofo~~i0$ Of Dm~C'tO ~§ Co i.;n ty S an i fo ~i on Distri ccs P. 0 . Box 5 175 of 0 1aDg e Cou;ity , Ca!iforni a 108111~ ~ll is Avenue Fount·Ji r, V<:liey, Cal if., 9?..708 2 Adjourned Regular Meeting June 30 _, 19'70 -6 : 00 p . m .. (1) Rol l Cal l (2) Report of the General Manager (3) Report of the General Counsel (4 ) Report and discussion of preliminary engineer 1 s r eport dated June 30 _, 1970, on deficiencies i n the District 1 s present trunk and sub trunk sewer sy stem and c onsideration of motion to receive and file said report . (5) Report of Director of Finance on f i n a ncing of future n ee d e d faci.li ties d e scribed in the engineer 1 s J une 30 preliminary repo r t and consideration o f mot i on to rec e ive and file said repo rt (6 ) Consideration of motion di rect i ng t he staff to plan an increase in District 1 s tax rat e suffici ent to c onstruct n ee d ed future faci l i ti e s in t he Dist r ict , wi th said incr ease not to exceed $0 .06 per $1 00 assessed valuation for 1970 -71 (7 ) Co n sideration of motion to direct the General Manager to s e cure proposals f rom Lowry and Associates for the following : a . Preparation of pre l iminary d es ign study f or the Santa Ana Rive r Int erc e ptor S ewe r b . Preparat i on of Ma ste r P lan o f trunk and sub- trunk sewers in the Dis t rict wi th said prop osals to b e considered at t he next r egul a r mee ting. (8 ) Othe r business a.nd communications , if any (9 ) Consideration of motion to adjourn ..,,,..,- '• SIDNEY L. LOWRY PRESIDENT LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES CIVIL ENGINEERS ASSOCIATES t2t EAST WASHINGTON AVENUE SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA g2701 HARRY C. BILLINGS, VICE PRES. Telephone 541-5301 Area Code 714 Board of Directors of June 30, 1970 County Sanitation District No. 2 Orange County, California Gentlemen: DONALD J. MARTINSON. VICE PRES. The following is a brief preliminary report on deficiencies in the District's present trunk and sub-trunk sewer system, recommendations for additional facilities and the estimated cost thereof. Statement of the Problem (1) The major trunk sewer serving the easterly portion of District 2 is the Newhope Placentia Trunk. Numerous sub-trunk sewers feed into the Newhope Placentia Trunk (Reference 1). The flow in this trunk is rapidly reaching capacity, and as lands continue to develop in these areas, additional trunk sewer capacity is obviously needed. (2) In addition to the overloading of the Newhope Placentia Trunk, new ·developments (residential~ commercial, and industrial) in the north- easterly portion of the District are creating capacity problems in the existing sub-trunk sewer system. A re-evaluation of the sub- trunk sewer system is also needed. (3) Planning for the construction of District trunk sewer facilities has been delayed by the proposed joint construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer with Riverside County. Background (1) The existing trunk sewer system was planned and constructed in the 1950's before the actual growth potential of the area was fully realized by the planners. The very large number of people migrating to Orange County during the 1950's and 60's which produced the fastest growing area in the United States has resulted in an over- loading of the older trunk sewers, including the Newhope Placentia Trunk. This does not necessarily imply that the trunk sewers should have been constructed much larger in the first place, because at the June 30, 1970 Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 Page -2- time of construction, assessed valuations were low, and therefore the ability to finance construction programs was limited. (2) A study to evaluate the trunk sewer needs of the District was made in 1965 (Reference 1), and at that time it was predicted that the Newhope Placentia Trunk would be flowing full by the early 1970's. (3) Flow measurements have been taken in the trunk sewer system since 1965, and these measurements confirm the prediction that additional trunk sewer capacity is urgently needed. Figure 1 shows the latest measurements taken in the system along with the capacities of the various reaches in the system. Figure 2 shows graphically how the flow in the Newhope Placentia Trunk has increased in the past five years, and that if the flow continues to increase at the same rate, the trunk will be flowing full within two years. (4) In order to provide relief to the lower reach of the Newhope Placentia Trunk, the District has recently constructed the Trask Avenue Inter- ceptor sewer that will divert flows from the lower reach of the New- hope Placentia Trunk to the Euclid Trunk. This will provide substantial temporary relief to the lower reach. However, this project will not solve the capacity problems for the upper areas. (5) New developments scheduled for construction in the Northern portion of the District between now and 1972 will generate flows far in excess _of the available capacity.in the existing sub-trunk system in that area. The total potential flow in 1972 will be nearly double the existing capacity of the Cypress Avenue Sub-trunk (10.7 mgd compared to a capacity of 5.9 mgd) which serves the area proposed for develop- ment. The areas being developed now, or proposed for development, and the present trunk sewer plan as developed in earlier studies are shown in Figure 3. Discussion (1) In order to provide major trunk sewer capacity to supplement the existing Newhope Placentia Trunk, it has been proposed to construct a Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer along the westerly bank of the river from the upper areas of District 2 to Plant 1 (Reference 1). (2) Riverside County has for many years considered the possibility of con- structing a non-reclaimable waste line along the Santa Ana River from Riverside County to the ocean. During this past year feasibility studies have been made of a joint project with Riverside County, June 30, 1970 Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 Page -3- whereby one sewer would be constructed to serve the needs of both the District and Riverside County. In addition, Riverside County would purchase treatment plant capacity from the joint Districts. This feasibility study (Reference 2) showed that considerable savings ($2.7 million to District 2 and $2.5 million to Riverside County) could be realized thereby. Agreements have been executed between District 2 and Riverside County that permit the construction of a joint project. It is now possible to move forward with the planning and preliminary design of a joint Santa Ana River Interceptor sewer project. (3) In order to serve the developing areas of the District to the extent provided for developed areas, an expansion of the existing sub-trunk system is needed. A tentative program was outlined in the 1965 Re- port (Reference 1) and in a later county report (Reference 3), but an updating and expansion of these studies is needed. These sub- trunk sewers will divert flows to the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer. (4) It is estimated that it will take approximately two years for the design and construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer project, and therefore it is imperative, unless growth is halted, that this project and the necessary expansions to the sub-trunk sys- tem be started as soon as possible to relieve the Newhope Placentia Trunk and the sub-trunks by 1972. Cost Considerations (1) The following cost estimates for the potential future District expen- ditures have been made. Item Sub-Trunk Sewers and Pump Stations Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer Total Cost (Millions) Independent Program E1.....!>istrict 5.6 7.8 13.4 In Cooperation with Riverside County 3.4 7.3 10.7 The cost of the sub-trunk sewers and pump stations will require re- evaluation in the proposed Master Plan report. June 30, 1970 Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 Page -4- (2) It will be possible to stage the construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer over a two year period, and the local facilities over a somewhat longer period, depending on the results of the Master Plan study and future growth patterns (Tables 1 and 2). Recommended Immediate Course of Action In accordance with the cooperative agreement, Riverside County has until December 1, 1970 to arrange for financing its share of the costs of the joint project. However, the timing requirements for relief of the Newhope Placentia Trunk are so critical that preliminary design of the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer should start as soon as possible. If it is not possible for Riverside County to participate in the pro- ject, District 2 must move ahead with its own project. Further, the sub- trunk system needs present re-evaluation to provide the required service as previously outlined. Therefore, it is recommended that the District: (1) Authorize the preparation of a preliminary design study for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, including determination of align- ment and route, utility relocation requirements, right of way re- quirements and/or cooperative agreements with other agencies, but not including the sizing of the sewer until the extent of the par- ticipation of Riverside County is determined. (2) Authorize the preparation of a Master Plan of Trunk and Sub-trunk' _Sewers which will provide.for the newly developing areas and for the diversion of existing flows to the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer. Respectfully submitted, Lowry and Associates Sidney L~-Lowry, Pres±aent Donald J. ~',Martinson, Vice President ( ( TABLE 1 ESTJYJ.ATED CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM DISTRICT NO. 2 Without Participation by Riverside County Project Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer Plant 1 to Katella Avenue Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer Katella Avenue to Riverside Fwy. Yorba Linda Pump Station and Force Main, Palm Drive Trunk, Carbon Canyon Trunk and Portion of North Santa Ana River Trunk Remaining Sub-Trunk Sewers Totals Total Cost $ 6,000,000 1,800,000 1,500,000 4,100,000 $13,400,000 Expenditures by Years 70-71 71-72 72-73 73-74 3,000,000 3,000,000 1,800,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 3,000,000 4,800,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 ( 74-75 2,600,000 2,600,000 ( ( TABLE 2 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM DISTRICT NO. 2 With Participation by Riverside County Project Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer Plant 1 to Katella Avenue Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer Katella Avenue to County Lin~ Yorba Linda Pump Station and Force Main, Palm Drive Trunk, Carbon Canyon Trunk Remaining Sub-Trunk Sewers Totals Total Cost $ 4,100,000 3,200,000 1,400,000 2,000,000 $10,700,000 Expenditures by Years 70-71 71-72 72-73 73-74 2,050,000 2,050,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,000,000 2., 059 ,000 3,650,000 3,000,000 1,000,000 ( 74-75 1,000,000 1,000,000 List of References 1. "Preliminary Engineer's Report, County Sanitation District No. 2," March, 1965, Lowry and Associates 2. "Feasibility Report for Joint Outfall Sewer Project with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District," June, 1969, Lowry Engineering-Science 3. "Waste Water Disposal and Reclamation for County of Orange, 1966- 2000," July, 1966, Lowry and Associates and Engineering-Science, Inc. - - F IGURE LOS ANGELES COUNTY C OUNTY SAN I TAT ION DI STRICT NO . 3 . M I OOLE REA CH - NE WHO PE TRUNK PLANT 1 O ec-68 Jan-69 38 50(Rain) 39(0ry) LEGEND @--Flow meosuremenf ~ token 3 /69 -mgd Capac i ty o f Trunk -mgd SAN BERNARDI N O COUNTY REACH -NEWHOPE P L ACENTI A TRUNK CO UN TY SANITAT ION DISTR I CT N0.7 L OWER R EA CH -NEWHOPE PLACENTIA TRUNK COUNTY SAN I TAT IO N DISTR IC T NO.I ORANGE COUNTY SANITAT ION DI ST RI CT No . 2 FLOW MEASUREME NTS 60 50 4 0 -'O CJl E s: 0 __J LL. 30 ORANGE COUN T Y SA NI TATION DISTRICT No. 2 FLOW PROJECTIONS NEWHOPE-PLACENTIA TRUNK FLOW MEASUREMENTS ~ PROJECTIONS ... Capacity-46 mgd YEAR F IGUR E 2 F IGURE 3 LOS ANGELES COUNTY NEW DEVELOPMENTS z PROPOSED F ULLERTON - BREA TRUNK 0 - I- <t I- z <t (f) >- I-z ::> 0 u r<) ci z I- ~ a:: I- (f) 0 E UCLID TRUNK ~~~-1-~~-.-~~-+-~~ CYPRESS SUR-:'"kUl .'K NE WHO PE PLACENTIA TRUNK SO ANAHEI M INTER- CEPTOR I I SAN BERNARDINO COUN TY t;EW DEVELOPMENTS PROPOS E D J__ CARBON CAl'IYON ,--sue-TRUNK 8 FORCE MAIN ;,Al. TA ANA TRUNK COU NTY S ANITATI ON D I S TR ICT No. I O UTH 5 ;1NTA ANA R I VER TRU NK COUNTY SANI TATION DI ST RICT No . 7 LEGEN D E x is t i ng Se wer Proposed Se w e r O RANGE COUN T Y SA NITATION DISTRICT No. 2 EX !ST I NG AN D PROPOSED TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM ( Description REVENUE Tax Revenue (at current tax rate of $.4261) Other Revenue Federal Participation Riverside Participation Miscellaneous Carry-Over From Previous Fiscal Year Total Funds Available EXPENDITURES Master Plan Construction Other Expenditures -Operating and Joint Works Expansion Total Expenditures Carry-Over To Following Fiscal Year Minimwn Required Reserve Carry-Over Fund Balance or (Deficit) ( COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 PROJECTED CASH FLOW STATEMENT FISCAL YEARS 1970-71 THROUGH 1974-75 With Participation By Riverside County 1970-71 $ 3,485,000 488,ooo 618,000 300,000 7,870,000 $ 12,761,000 $ 2,050,000 5,451,000 $ 7,,501,000 $ 5,260,000 (2,085,000) $ 1971-72 3,764,ooo 252,000 1,007,000 250, 000 5,260,000 $ 10.,533,000 $ 3,650,000 4,104,ooo $ 7,754,ooo $ 2,779,000 (1,517,000) 1972-73 $ 4,065,000 250,000 2,779,000 7,094,ooo $ 3,,000,000 3,425,000 $ 6_,425,000 $. 669,000 (1,264,000) $ $ 4,391,000 250,000 669,000 5,310,000 $ 1,000,000 3,847,000 $ 4,847,000 $ 463,000 $ 4 742 000 , ,, 250,000 llo·,...~ O"O ' _,, u $ 3.968.000 $ 4_, 968, 000 $ 487,000 (1,508,000) $ 3,175,000 $ 1,262,000 $ (595,000) $ (855,000) $ (1~021,000) .... ~ ..... ( Descriution F.EVENUE Tax Revenue ·(at current tax rate of $.4261) Other Revenue Federal Participation Miscellaneous <. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 PROJECTED CASH FLOW STATEMENT FISCAL YEARS 1970-71 THROUGH 1974-75 Without participation by Riverside County 1970-71 1971-72 $ 3,485,000 $ 3,764,ooo 488,ooo 300,000· 252,000 250,000 1972-73 $ 4,065,000 250,000 ( $ 4,391,000 250,000 Schedule B June 26, 1970 Preliminary 250,000 Carry-Over From Previous Fiscal Year _____ 7~,_87~0 ___ ,0_0_0 ______ 3~,~6~9-2_,_0_0_0 _________ (~9_4_6~,o_o_o ___ ) ____ ~(l~,~5~5~6-,~o-o_o~)----~(-l~,~9-1~9~,o-o_o--'-) Total Funds Available $ 12,143,000 $ 7,958,000 $ 3,369,000 $ 3,085,000 $ 3,073,000 EXPENTI I TURES Master Plan Construction Other Expenditures -Operating and Joint Works Expansion Total Expenditures Carry-Over to Following Fiscal Year MinimUJ!l Required Reserve Carry-Over Fund Balance or (Deficit) $ 3,000,000 $ 4,800,000 5,451?000 4?104,ooo $ 8,451,000 $ 8,904,ooo $ 3,692,000 $ (946,ooo) ( 2, 085 ,-000) (1,517,000) $ 1,607,000 $ (2,463,000) $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 2,600,000 3,504,ooo 3,642,000 $ 4,925,000 $ 5,004,ooo $ 6,242,000 $ (1,556,000) $ (1,919,000) $ (3,169,000) (1,264,ooo) (1,318,000) (1,508,000) $ (2,820,000) $ (3,237,000) $ (4,677,000) ( ( ( "1chedule c June 30, 1970 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 I. PROJECTED CASH FLOW STATE:MENT I) t~ FISCAL YEARS 1970-71 THROUGH 1974-75 Iv, C'oCJ $ 0 0 ">r;, ~ 1::-,l.. s"~ ~o ~I) OF 1t. ti) <f'lr.· "' Without participation by Riverside County "IU, 'of) &~ 0 (',.._ lt1 r, ~-~r. u0 ~ (1-;C'f~"J, Description 1970'-71 1971-72 1972-73 19?0 REVENUE Tax Revenue (increase current tax rate $.06 to $.4861) $ 3,977,000 $ 4,295,000 $ 4,638,000 $ 5,009,000 $ 5,410,000 Other Revenue Federal Participation 488,ooo 252,000 Miscellaneous 300,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Carry-Over From Previous Fiscal Year 7,z870.z000 4 2 184,ooo Tl, ooo 402000 22~~000 Total Funds Available $ 12,635.000 $ 8,981,000 $ . 4, 965, 000 $ 5,,299,000 $ 5:955,000 EXPENDITURES Master Plan Construction $ 3,000,000 $ 4,800,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 2,600,000 Other Expenditures -Operating and Joint·Works Expansion 5,z451.?000 4.2104.2000 3,z425.2000 325042000 3~642.2000 Total Expenditures $ 8,451.2000 $ 8,904.2000 $ 4,925,000 $ 5,004,ooo $ 62242,000 Carry-Over to Following Fiscal Year $ 4,184,ooo $ 77,000 $ 40,000 $ 295,000 $ (287,000) Minimum Required Reserve Carry-Over (2,085.zOOO) (1,517.zOOO) (1.z264.2ooo) (12318,000) (1,508.2000) Fund Balance or (Deficit) $ 2.a022.2000 $" (1,4402000) '$ (1 2224.:!oooy $' (1:02J~OOO) $ (1~795~000)' One cent added to the tax rate will raise $ 81,808 $ 88,353 $ 95,421 $ 103,055 $ 111,299 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX Bl 27, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE [EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAYJ June 25, 1970 NOTICE OF MEETING TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 Special District No. 3 Committee for Award of Contract No. 3-J)t (Revised) -June 30, 5:30 p.m., Di_st_ricts' office Chairman Norman E. Culver Director Wade Herrin (Chairman of Committee) Director Edward Just Director Derek McWhinney As directed at the June 10th joint board meeting, the above committee was appointed to meet and award the contract for the Westminster Avenue Interceptor Sewer (Contract No. 3-14 Revised) prior to July 1st. It was originally agreed that the committee would meet on June 29th, but by unanimous consent of the cor~..mi ttee members and beca.use of the subsequent District Ho. 2 board meeting at 6:00 p.m. on June 30th, the hour and date has been changed to that stated above. ' For the committee's background information on this matter!' V1ff'. 1 are attaching an excerpt froin the June 10th ma:n.ager' s ageEda report which explains "Lhe necessity for award of this contract prior to July 1st. Also attached are two bid tabulations, one for the original bids taken on May 26th and the other for the re-bids on June 24th. No recommendation from the staff and engineer on the subject can be ma.de at this time but will be made at the time of the committee meeting. Paul G. Brown Assistant General Manager PGB:gc Excerpt from Manag e r 's Ag e nda Report, Joint Meeting, J u ne 10, 1970 Nos. 44, 45 and !~6 -AUTHORIZ ATIO N FOR TAKING NEW BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 3-14 (REVISED ): Bids on this proj ect, wh ich is a 57-inch gravity sewer in We stminster Boulevard from the te rmination of the Westminster Avenue Force Ma in (see above item) to the Miller- Holder Trw1k Sewer in Ed1·.rards Street, we re opened on May 26. From the bid tab ulation, ·which is included with the agenda, it can be s een that only four bids were rec eived , which is conside r ably below the number we have be en experiencing, and tha t the lm·1 bid was a pproximat e ly $117,000 , or 20%, above the engineer's es timate . Addin g to the problem, the low bidder, on May 27, submitted a r equest that his bid be resc inded on the basis of omissions made by him i n preparing the bid . In or der to obtain assured Fede ral funds (33 %) for this pro ject, a cont rac t must be a1-·rarded by J une 30 . Aft er extensive conference s with the design engineers and con- sultation with Ch a irman Cu lver, it was decided t o c ~ll for new bids imme di ately in order tha t the award deadline can be met . It was further agre e d that the eng i n eers would modify the p roject to the extent of r educing the d iameter of the pipe under the San Diego fr ee - way from 5 7 -inch to 48-inch and would approach the State Division of Highw ays towards relax ing the ir fr eei.vay crossing r equirements. The original de sign requir e d a.n 8!!.~j.nch d:i.ameter, 615 foot long tunne l unde r the fr eeway , with chemi c a l grouting of' the so:Ll in the tunnel area . This tunne l section was thus v ery expensive (p articularly with the grouting r equi reme nts) and it is hop ed that w:lth the above de scribed c hcmges , signif:i.cantJ.y lower b lds 1·1ill be r eceived . Also, we are h opeful that re -bidding the job with the chang es indicated will attract more bidders . In view of the above, the thr ee j_nd:i.ca ted i t e rn s on th e agenda · are reconunendE:cJ. by the Cha.irmm1 , engineers and staff , Th e engine ers will be avai l a.b le to ans1ier er1y questions t he Directors ma y h a ve on this matter . Engineer's Estimate: $597,027 BID TABULATION S H E E T Date May 26, 1970 11:00 a.m. Contract For: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR FACILITIES, WESTMINSTER AVENUE INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-lh CONTRACTOR K.E.C. Company & Keith E. Card (A Joint Venture) 22018 S. Norwalk Blvd. Hawaiian Gardens, CaJjf, 91020 Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. 1704 Rux.ton Lane Redondo Beach, California 90278 Salata, Inc. 7920 Main Street Stanton, California 90680 Dru1mnond & Bronneck, Inc. 1710 Santa Monica Blvd. Santa Monica, California r.r. -;,, By • ~ . TOTAL BID $714,745.00 $839,272.00 $883,320.00 $888,410.00 Eng. Estimate: $734,001.00 B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N SHEET Date . Ju..~e 24, 1970 Contract For: WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR FACILITIES WESTMINSTER AVENUE INTERCEPTOR·SEWER CONTRACT NO. 3-ll~ (REVISED) 1. 2. 3. 4. CONTRACTOR K.E.C. Compan~ & Keith E. Card P. o. Box 133e · . Hawaiian Gardens, California Sala ta, Inc. ·p. O. Box 224 -7920 Main St. Stanton, California 90680 Zarubica Co., Prkacin & ~unje Jt. Venture 8550 Tujunga Avenue 81 m ~Ta] J ey:' Ca 1 j fornj a R. G. Atckison Co. 2425 Gundry Signal Hill, California 90806 5. Radco Construction, Inc. 2495 Huntington Drive · San Marino, California 91108 --- 6. (J. v.) TOTAL BID $790,270 $797,430 $879,876 $955, 737 ' ----------------------------------- .8. ~ 10. Ii . DO Anos Of o rn~cr OR S County SanitaHon Dis !rlds cf Ora nge County, California P. 0. Box 5175 10841-1 Elli s f,venlJ 'J Fountain Vr.illey, Ca!i F., 9270$ _II :====D=.IS=T=R=IC=. 1· No. II Special Contract Committee Meeting June 30, 1970 -5 :30 p .m. (1) Roll Call (2) Report of the General Manager AG ENDA (3) Consideration of Resolution No . 70-108-7, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding Contract No . 3-14 (Revised) (Westminster Interceptor Facilities, Westminster Avenue I nterceptor Sewer) to K.E .C. Company & Keith E . Card, a Joint Venture, in the total amount of $790,270.00 (4) Consideration of motion to adjourn RESOLUTION NO. 70-108-7 AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CONTRACT NO. 3-14 (REVISED) A RESOLUTION OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WESTMINSTER INTERCEPTOR FACILITIES, WESTMINSTER AVENUE INTERCEPTOR SEWER (CONTRACT NO. 3-14 REVISED) * * * * * * * WHEREAS, by mesns of Resolution No. 70-102-3, adopted by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, on June 10, 1970, the Chairman of the District was authorized and directed to appoint a Special Committee on the WESTMINSTER INTERCEPTOR FACILITIES, WESTMINSTER AVENUE INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-14 (REVISED); and, WHEREAS, by means of said resolution, said Committee was authorized to award contract for said work on behalf of County Sanitation District No. 3; ·and, WHEREAS, the Chainnan of the District duly appointed Directors Wade Herrin, Edward Just and Derek McWhinney to serve with him as said Special Committee; and, WHEREAS, by means of Resolution No. 70-102-3, adopted by the I Board 9f Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, on June 10, 1970, the Chairman and Secretary of the District were authorized to execute the contract for said work upon award by the Special Committee, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED: Section 1. That the bid tabulation and recommendation this day submitted by Boyle Engineering, District engineers, and concurred in by the District's Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to K.E.C. Company & Keith E. Card, a Joint Venture, for WESTMINSTER INTERCEPTOR FACILITIES, WESTMINSTER AVENUE INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-14 (REVIS~D), and the proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for said Contract No. 3-14 (Revised) be awarded to .!_(~~· C. Company & Keith E. Card, a Joint Venture, in the total amount of $790,270.00, in accordance with the terms of the bid and the prices. contained therein submitted by said Joint Venture; and_, Section 3. That all other bids received f'or this work are hereby rejected_, and tha all bid bonds be returned to the un- successful bidder. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Special Contract Committee meeting held June 30_, 1970. . .. ,