The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1970-04-08II MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, April 8, 1970 7:30 p.m. P. 0. Box 5 175 10844 ~llis Avenue Fountai n Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones : Are a Code 714 5 40-2910 96 2 -241 1 April 3 , 1 9 7 0 The following is a bri e f explanation of the mo r e i mp o rta nt n on- routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which a re n o t otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are not attache d t o the a g enda since they are mad e up immediately prec e ding the me eting but will appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting. * * * * * * * * * * * Joint Boards Nos. 15, 16 and 17 -PROPOSED UNIFORM CONNECTION AND USE OR DINANCE : This matter was reported on in detail in the agenda report f o r the March 25 adjourned .meeting a t which time the Dire ctors r e viewe d the ordinanc e at some length. As directed, there will be a public hearing on the ordinance at this meeting, after which formal action on its adoption is scheduled for each District. As mentioned at the March 25 meeting , the staff has some suggested changes to b e considered by the Boards, which are enclosed with the agenda material. Th e se sugg est ions were approved by the Executive Committee on March 31 and it is antici- pated that they, and any other changes desired by the Boards, will be inc orporated in the enclosed draft ordinance before adoption. Item No. 17 is consideration of the resolution discuss e d at the March 25 meeting which declares the intent of the District s to maintain : as much as possible, comparable charges with those of the Lo s Angeles County Sanitation Districts. Nos. 18 and 19 -REPORT OF EXECUTIVE AND BUILDING COMMITTEE S AND ACTION ON CO:MMITTEES' RECOMMENDATIONS : The two Committees met j ointly on March 31 and considered a number of items of concern to the Joint Boards. A report of the meeting , together with recomme n d a tion s o f the Committees to the Joint Boards is enclosed in this mailing . Item No. 1 9 (a t o g) is consideration of action on the recommendations of the Committees. -1- No. 20 -AUTHORIZATION FOR PURCHASE OF VEHICLES: Bids will be taken on April 7 for two replacement vehicles, a jeep and a one-half ton pickup truck. The former is used principally on the beach for daily collection of surf water samples. The latter will be one of our fleet of working vehicles. A bid tabulation and recommendation for award will appear with the final agenda for the meeting. No. 21 -APPROVAL FOR BID OF PAVING IMPROVEMENTS AT PIANT NO. 2: As part of our program for improving the appearance of this plant, as~halt paving of certain areas in the vicinity of the new Headworks "c' building is budgeted and scheduled for this spring. Plans and specifications for this work are now ready for approval, with bids to be received on May 8 and award to be made at the May 13 Board meeting. The estimate for this contract, for approximately 77,000 square feet of paving, is $25,000. No. 22 -REPORT ON PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO STATE OCEAN WATER QUALITY STANDARDS: This matter was discussed by Mr. Hunt, of John Carollo Engineers, and myself at the March 25 Board meeting. A further report on developments and a r ecommendat ion on the Districts' position on this matter will be made. No. 23 -REPORT ON SUPPLEMENTAL DISASTER RELIEF APPLICATION FOR OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2: The status of this matter was also reported on at the March 25 Board meeting. The contractor has been advised to have his attorney confer with Mr. Nisson on this matter, with a view toward a possible resolution at this meeting. District No. 1 No. 28 -AWARD OF JOB NO. Pl-15,P2-15: Bids for this contract, which was described in some detail in a previous agenda report, were opened on March 20. The engineers and staff are recommending that award be made to the Hood Corporation of Whittier, the low bidder at $767,522 . A bid tabulation is enclosed. No. 31 -ADJOURNMENT TO APRIL 28: It will be recommended that the Board adjourn to 4:30 p.m., on the abcve date to meet jointly with the District No. 7 Board. This meeting will immediately precede the regularly scheduled April Executive Committee meeting. For a brief discussion of the .matters to be taken up at the adjourned meeting refer to Item No. 57 (District No. 7). District No. 3 Nos. 35 and 36 -WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR FACILITIES: As the Directors are aware, the District has budgeted and is ready to commence work on four projects in the Los Alamitos-Seal Beach-Westminster area . Collectively these projects are known as the Westside Interceptor Facilities and include a major pumping station, gravity sewers and a force main to transport wastewater from the San Gabriel River drain- age area of the District easterly to the District's existing Miller- -2 - Holder Trunk Sewer. The staff and engineers plan to report verbally on the various aspects of these projects at this meeting before seeking · authorization to call for bids on the individual projects (Item No. 26).: District No. 8 No. 43 -SEMI-ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT: The other Districts_, at their regular March 11 Board meeting_, received and filed this report and since District No. 8 meets only quarterly, a similar action is recommended for this meeting. District ~£.:.-2. No. 46 -RELOCATION OF BAYSIDE DRIVE TRUNK SEWER BY IRVINE COMPANY (PROM ONTO:P.Y BAY DEVELOPMENT): Included with the agenda material is a letter from the Irvine Company on this matter which is self-explanatory. It is recommended that the latter be referred to the District's engineer for a report at the proposed adjourned meeting on April 10. No. 47 -INTENT TO PROCEED WITH DESIGN OF FACILITIES: It is recom- mended that the Board take the action indicated in order to form the basis for action at the proposed April 10 adjourned meeting (.Item No. 50). No. 50 -ADJOURNMENT TO APRIL 10: Chairman Parsons has suggested that the Board adjourn to this date at 4:00 p.m., in the Newport Beach City Hall for further discussion toward resolving immediate problems facing the District with regard to the urgently needed underwater Upper Bay force main construction and the proposed relocation of the Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer (Item No. 46). District No. 7 No. 54 -ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT: This is acceptance of an easement, at no cost to the District, r e lative to construction of an offsite sewer to serve Tustin East Apartment development. No. 57 -ADJOURNMENT TO 4:30 P.M., APRIL 28 : It is recommended that the Board adjourn to this hour and date, which is immediately preceding the n ext regularly scheduled Executive Committee meeting. The purpose of the meeting is to evolve plans and take necessary ac tion toward getting the recently approved bond issue construction p rog ram under way as soon as possible. This meeting will .·be held jointly with the Board of District No. 1 since the latter has a substantial interest and commitment in the facilities to be constructed. -3- Fred A. Ha rper General Manage r ' . ·.D1-\'11 E JOINT BOJ\HDS Miller, C. McWhinney _o.,, __ Bousman ..,,,,. Brooks, Burton -~---· Culver ~ -Furman , Paut . G ~z .. G:t'e"en Gr:l set AnQ.~rs0n Harvey Herrin Kroesen Mel:Ail~ Marshall Marshott Nevil Parsons Porter ·Reinhardt R&@we s·chutte Just· Shipley Sttrltl1 Clark, Robert ·Workman Allen Har·per Brown Carlson Clarke Dunn Pinster Gallmwy llohencr Keith LoT.·J.ry .Maddox Mar·tlnson Nj_sson Piersall Slr;ler Stevens Sylvester ~l'r·(m-iblay }$( s tcm ~ ·. Mlteficll V(~ClC1(~:t:' Allen 0.., ../ \?' ~-7·-· OTHERS '-""' _____ .. _._ lJJ.0'l'HJ.G'l' i ? .3 ~ 7 R /~-- REGULl\H v·· .ADJOURNED ------- Coco D_d--Davis DISTRIC'l1 1 -Warren ~ ·G~iset v--. . I ~ _..Miller, c. ~- Westra ./ Porter Langer 0 Allen -'b Coen Matney .DISTRICT 2 Hcrri.n _ .,. · Fuhr~an, Co~\·ray V"' ciark·~ Robert- ~_anod.~ . _ . . v ~Brooks, Burton Pa tte:r_sqn ./' Culver Otte V' ·Gomez Marshall v' Herrin Rogers ~ Nevil Weishaupt V"' "./Reinhardt Sims ./' vSchutte v Just ~ -·smith Root \1' .workman Marshall _,.. Allen · Cla!·k, Ralph .· Harper .,,,,.. Culver· .,_.... McWhinney ./'. Bousman ~ -v: v Hileman Hami~ton, Wm. Knudsen Phill:Lps. ~ Furman·; Paul a... ··Allen 0 1 E~ulJ:i.vrtn PldJJ.:i p;.~ · .,_; Green ~·--....,, :Herrin ~ ~ Anderson ~ ~ Harvey '--' v' _Kroesen v v Marshott v-..,.... Nevil ..,_...... Rej_nhardt --~· v ............. v--Schutte ~ v' -Just 7 v Clark; Robert ,,,,.. v -Allen .......-:-, Parsons .,,,,. .. Mars ha 11 v Allen V. Porter ........-•.. b"J&JN:~_fil · v Allen V" MD.Jcr, ....,. G:r:i set v 'Porter ·v-J=>Qfj@J2Lt v-:~· Sl!l :it h • ./ II-' I • V"" •• C. l I i . . v \ fndplcy .,,,,,.-... G rc:c~n V-·AJ ::.cm ,,;· '.~ ~__:_ ~ DIS'EHIC'I'. 6 v 7' ~~ DJS 1J1ETC 1J1. 11 -·--·--·--·7· -..... ·-~-------~~ .. Herrin ~ Coco '/· Phillips / Hamil ton, ·wm •tl Warren rl -r ,.., ../' Langer . ~-P?-~ t~r~~.fl. Sims f~ Root N Clar!<:~. ija~phrJ Harper ··.,.... Hileman V" Knudsen tt1' Phj_llips t/ .,.. ,,, Davis .,. Westra A Coen .,,, Patterson ~ liuhrme.n,, Cor1~~-: tan6C1e .,,,.. Otte .,. Weishaupt t/' Sims N Root r--1 Clark '" Harper v Hamilton /'I Phillips v v Rogers / Phill:Lps ·V' Marshall ~ Phill:i.ps v Coco ·V' JierPln V""" v Mars11r1 l l vr. lttlcm.~ln v Allen .,,,,, v M;t t1)c·y ..,.... Pl I :i.1J~i.p~: ~· -_,,,,,,- Chairman Miller Item·No. 12 Call meeting of Executive and Building Committees for 5:30 p.m., Tuesday, April 28th. Guests: Directors Marshott, Brooks & McWhinney Ask Apprentice, Don Bloom, to step forward. Ask Jean Bankston to read the Certificate of Completion -Apprentice I to be presented to Don Bloom. Don is a graduate of Villa Park High School, and prior to joining the .._,, Districts as an apprentice, he attended Santa Ana College. Since he has been with the Districts he has enrolled in courses at Golden West College, majoring in purchasing. I understand that Don and his wife hav~ recently purchased a house in Huntington Beach just two blocks from the Plant, so it looks like he is going to be with us for a while. Presentation of Apprentice I Certificate Ask Don if he has any comments he would like to make. f20 J.,,.JL1S Of o m~SCf 0~~$ (01 1 ~1ty S<rn ifo tion Di stricts of Oran·;:iz Ccnmty , C.:ilifomi a JO /f \IJ .. BOAJ<DS P. 0 . Box 5 175 10 8 4 4 E ll is Avenuo; Foun t ain \la!le y, Ca liF., 92708. -----·--------·--·--· II lo AGEND A (1) Pl e d g e of Al leg j_a,n c e and Invo c a tion (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8 ) ( 9 ) (1 0) (11) Roll Ca l l Appointme nts of Ch airme n pro t ern, i f n e ce ssa r y DISTRICT 1 -Cfonsi d c:ration of moti on approving mj_nut e s of the regular meeting he ld March 11, and the adj ou rned regu lar me eting h e ld Ma rch 25 DISTRIC T 2 Consid era tion o f moti on approving mi n ut e s o f t he reg ula r mee ting h e l d Ma rc h 11, a nd the ad j ourned regula r mee ting h e l d Ma rch 25 DIST RICT 3 Considerat i on o f motion app r ovi n g mi nutes o f the re g ula r mee tin g held Ma rch 11, a n d t he ad j ourned r egular me eting he l d Ma rc h 25 DI STHI CT 5 Co nsid e r a.ti on of moti on approvin g minut e s o f t h e r egul a r meeting h e l d March 1 1 , and the ad j ourn ed r egular me eting held March -2 5 DI STRICT 6 Consid e r at ion of moti c n approv i r..g mi n utes of the r egular mee t i n g he ld Ma rch 11, a n d t h e a d j o u r ne d regul ar mee ting he l d March 25 DI STRICT 7 Consid e r a t i on of moti on a p provin g m.inntes o f t he regu.l a r meeting h eld Ma rch 1 1, a n d the a(.jo urned r egula r mee~ings h e l d Ma rc h 25 a n d Ma,:c cll. 26 DISTRIC T 8 Con side r a tion o f moti on approv ing ndnutes of the r e g u l ar meet i ng held J anu o..ry 1 4 DI STRI CT lJ.. (;oi--is:Lde r a tion of moti on a.p p r ovi ng minut es of' trh~ r egul a r mee ting held Mar ch 1 1 , and the acl,joi.n'ned · r eg ula r meetln g h e ld Ma r ch 25 __. ALL DIS '.L'EICTS -He1-iorf o :t' -:c he Join t Cha:i r man ', :-•1 T -~S 'l'JUVJ'S -·-ne po-rt of t: .1(·; ~.r~ ( 15) ALL DISTRIC'I'S (16) (17) (19) Consideration of motion op ening publ i c hearing on t he Districts' proposed ordinance relating to connection to and use of District sewerage facilities. See page 11 F 11 A . Receive and file staff suggestions for changes as approved by the Executive Committee /µw,v-~~ ~):Jc,c,~li~ B. Written or ?iFr~l communications or protes~~~~~--#~~ See page 1 ~~~iµif; C. Motion to close hearing · l ' ~ • ALL DISTRICTS ,M ULL-V~ -/3Y p;°'s,fR;c f-~A~ i-v 7 Consideration of adoption of the Districts ' Connection and Use Ordinance, incorporating the staff's suggestions and any other changes in wording as the Boards may direct: District No. Ordinance No . 1 102 ~- 2 202 ~ 3 3 02· rn/r; 5 505 ~ 6 602 ~ 7 711 i4' 11 11 02 (Vi./~ ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution of intention No. 70-57 "G"~ r elative to the Connection and Use Ordinance . See page ALL DISTRICTS Report of ihe Executive and Building Committees, and jlj_____, consideration of motion to ·receive a~d file written -~ _, report ~ ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following actions as recomm ended by the Exe cutive and Building Committee s : ~jl/ A. Approvai of Master Plans for Plant -/:/J .~I A.0'' No . 1 and Plant ~o. 2, prepare d by William Ficker, A .I.A. B. Authorization for purc ha se o f the necessary irrigation pipe, f ittings , electrical conduit, and fixtures to implement t he Mas t er Plan i mprovements at Plant No~ 2, in an amount not to exceed $ _5 Co-t>, / . C. Approval of membership in the Associat i on of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencie s , and authorizin g payment of dues of $1,041 for r~na inder of the calenda r year D. Resolution No. 70-58, exten d i n g Pa r k Lea se with th e City of Fountain Vall e y . Se e page "H" E. Resolution No . 70-59, approving am e ndm ent to Positions and Salaries resolution to provide one po sition f or Indus trial Divi s ion. See page "I " -2- (20) (21) (2 4 ) (25 ) (2 6 ) F . Consid e ration of emp l oyee g rievance c l a i m G. Author i zation for open house and pla n t inspe c tion tour Septemb er 1 6th ALL DISTRICTS Considerati on of mot i on awardi ng purchase of the fo l lowing : One , 4-Whee l Drive "Jeep Universal 11 ,Specification No . A-044 to Brian Chuchua 's 4-Wheel Drive Center i rl the amount of $ 2 , 493 . 84 . (Bid open i ng Ap ril 7th). See page · 1J-rr-- One , On e -·h a l f Ton Pickup Truck, Specificat ion No . A-0 4 3 to To mmy Ayres Chevro l et i n t he amount of $ 2 , l l~O .1 2 (Bid opening Ap r il 7th ). See page "K ALL DI STRI CTS Cons i de r ation of Reso l ution No . 70-60 , approving p l ans ·A~../" and specifi cati ons for Site Improvem ents (paving) Phase ~~ IV at Plant No . 2 , Job No . P2 -8-5 , and authoriz i ng adve r t i s i ng for bids to be opened May 8th at 11 :00 a .m. See page 11 L11 AL L DI STR ICTS .__/) C'.:I_,_____,/~ ~ ~ / -0 c/ /~ - Staf f r e c omm e n dation on the Dis tri c ts ' position re l a tiv e · to the schedul ed hearing of t h e State Water Resourc es ~ Cont r ol Board to ame nd t h e e x i s t ing wate r q uality cont r o l pol icies f o r Ca l ifornia 's coa s tal and interstate wate rs AL L DI STRIC TS tJ of~ 5 Report o f the General Counsel on s u pp l emental Disaster Rel i ef app l i cat i on of Pete r Kiewit Sons ' Company re l ativ e to Ocean Out fal l No . 2 , Job No . J -1 0 A . DISTRICTS 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 11 Consideration o f motion authorizing execution by Di strict No . 1, of an application for Federal ~,_,_,v<-- financ ial assis t ance under the Federal Disas t e r ~ ;~ZA-·,t2 Re l i e f Act o f 1966 , r e l at i ve to extra costs d ue 4 ;,~J)#'·<I to storm damage , J o b No . J -1 0 (Ocean Outfa l l No . (~, 2 , Ma r ine Sec ti o n ) , as reco mmend ed by the General ~u,~~3 ~ Co un se l ~;~up B. DI STRI CT 1 Cons i de ra t i o n of reso lut i o n a u thorizing exec u t i on o f a n app l i cati on for Fe dera l f i nancial ass i stan c e u n der the Federal Di saster Relief Act of 1966 , re l ative to Ocean Outfall No . 2 , Mar i ne Sec t ion, J ob No . J -10 , as recommende d by the Gene r a l Co u nse l ALL DISTR I CT S Sta f f r e port on negot i at i ons wi t h Ri vers i de Co u n t y F loo d Control and Wa t er Conserv a tio n District fo r p urchas e o f capa city ri ghts i n o u r Di s t r icts ' treatment and disposa l f a ciliti es -~--/, ___.-;;:> ~ ---V-. ALL DISTRICTS Co n s i d erati on of mot i on to r e ceive a n d f ile Gen e ral Manage r 's c e r tifica.t i on t h a t he ha s checked all bi l ls appea rin g on the agenda, fo und t hem in o r der , and tha t he recommend s autho r ization fo r payment ALL DISTRIC TS Conside rat i on of ro ll call vo t e motion approving Joint Operating Fund , Capital outlay Revolving Fund , and Const r u ction Inspection Revo l ving F und warrant books , and aut h o rizing payment of claims listed on page s "A" "B 11 a nd lt c 11 ______ > -3 - (27) ALL DISTRICTS (28) (29) Other business and communications> if any DISTRICT 1 Considerat i on of Res o lution No. 70 -6 1-1> to file bid tabulation and recommendation> and tract for Job No . Pl -15 and P2 -15 (Digester Dewatering Faciliti es at Pl ants 1 and 2) to in the total amount of $767 >5 2 2 . See pages "NII DISTRICT 1 receive and awarding con- Solids Hood Co r poration 11 M11 and Consi der~~motion approving war r ants > if any.--S ee ~~D 11 . (30) DISTRICT 1 ~r:::mt'Siness and~~c~a~t~i~o~n~s~>_i~·~f ~a~n~y~~~~~~~~~ (31) DISTRICT 1 Con sideration of motion to adjourn t o 4 :30 p .m .> April 28th (32) DISTRICT 2 See k Consid e r at ion of motion approving warrants> i f a ny. page 11 D11 ( 33) DIST.fil.C-T-~ . . ..:---other business a11d-e·e ffl:ffitt:f.l::i:-e-atiurrs-;-:r r-a:n~ ( 34) DISTRICT 2 .11/1 _ ~ '. -z ~ Consideration of motion to adjourn ~ 2> · 0 DISTRICT 3 . Report of staff and engin e ers on sche dul in g o f construction> (3~) (37) (38 ) n egotiati ons with t h e U. S . Naval Weapon s De pot and County Sanitation Di s t r ict No . 4> and pos s ibl e F e d e r a l fundin g for West s ide Int e rcept or Facilit i e s (Contra ct s Nos . 3-11> 3 -12 > 3 -13> and 3 -1 4 ) DISTRICT 3 Consi de r a ti on o f the f ollowing r es olu tion s approving plans and specif ication s .f o r Wests ide Int e rc eptor Faciliti es , an d authoriz i n g adve rti s ing for bid s: Resolution No . Contract No . Page 70-62-3 3-11 itQ II 70-63-3 3-1 2 It ptt 70 -64 -3 3 -1 3 ll Q. 11 70 -6 5 -3 . 3-ll~ 11R11 DISTR ICT 3 Con s i de r at i on o f moti on app r oving wa r r a n t s > if any. p age 11 D11 DIST RICT 3 Ot h er busin ess and conunu n ic at i ons A. Co n s i de r at io n o f Re so lu tion No . 7 0 -68-3 , a u t h or i z i ng co nd e mn at i on in co nn ect i o n wi th rig ht s 0 f wa y n ee d ed i n co n struction o f Sea l Be ac h Bou levard Interc eptor Se wer , Co n tract No . 3 -11 B . Cons :i.d e ra t i.o n o f Resol u t i on No . 70-69-3 , a u thori z i ng JI)/) cond e nmatj_o n in co nn ec t :i.on wi th rig h ts of wa y n ee d e d ~ :Ln co ri st r uct i .o n o f . We stsid~ Ave nue I n terc e ptor Se we r , ~ Con tract No . 3 -14 • .. (39) DISTRICT 3 6) 1 / () /111 Consideration of motion to adjourn 2J : '-ti() V J''I 1 (40) DISTRICT 11 See 4 (41 ) ( 42) Consideration of motion approving warrants , if any . p age 11 E 11 an ,__£ommuni.c.a..t4: DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to ad j ourn (43) DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion to receive and file Finan cial Report submitted by Hanson, Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester, Certified Public Accountants, for the pe riod ended December 31, 1969 (44) DISTRICT 8 oth ar:--ws · ~ communications, if any (45) DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion to adjourn (46) DISTRIC T 5 ( 47) Conside ration o f motion to receive and f i le letter f rom The Irvine Company re l ative to relocation of the Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, and refer to the engineer for report . See page 11 S 11 · DISTRICT 5 Cons ide r ation of moti on declaring the Board 's intent, on April 10, 1970, to proc eed with t he design of t he i mmediately required facilities to serve the ultimate needs ' of the Distri c t east of the Bay Bridge Pum ping Station ( 4-8) DISTRICT 5 (50) (51) (52) ( Conside r ation of motion approving warrants, i f any . See page 11 D'' DISTRICT 5 o ~erfw1b~ aRd~~~ii~~ i /y v) ) 'V <=----c; DISTRICT 5 ~ Con sideration of moti on to adjourn to 4 :00 p .m., April 10th , Newpo r t Beach City Hall DISTRICT 6 . ~'fion ap iWn v"'i,ng--wa;rra:nt iF,'"i~e e DISTR ICT 6 Othe r busi s.s-afT d-comnra.nica t-ions, i f"-any- Consideration of motion to ad journ DISTRICT 7 Cons ideration of Resolution No . 70 -66 -7 , authorizing acc eptance of an easement from Edgar E . Pankey and Elizab e t h S . Panke y, at no cost, r elative to c onstruc t ion of an offs it e sewer to serve Tustin East Apa r tment Develop- ment . S ee page ~-11 ~ -5- ·~ ~ .. (55) DISTRICT 7 (56) '" (57) Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "E" DISTRICT.:£.-..· -Ot11:'Etr business DISTRICT 7 ·Consideration of motion to adjourn to 4:30 p.m., April 28th~ :I./.('" ~6- RESOLUT I ONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS April 8, 197C r WARRANT NO. 13001 13002 13003 1300~- _.,., 13005 13006 13007 13008 13009 13010 13011 13012 13013 13014 13015 13016 13017 13018 13019 13020 13021 13022 13023 13024 13025 13026 13027. 13028 13029 ...._;·13030 13031 13032 13033 13034 13035 13036 13037 13038 13039 13040 13041 130h2 130l~3 130'+h 13045 1301+6 130'+7 130L1.8 130l~9 13050 13051 13052 13053 1305'+ ...._;13055 13056 13057 13058 13059 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Abbey Rents Air West, Freight All Bearing Service, Inq., Pump Parts Alpine Aromatics, Inc., Odor Control Supplies American-Pacific Stamp Co., Small Hardware City of Anaheim, Power Anaheim Dodge, Truck Parts Andersen's Tool & Machinery, Small Tools The Anchor Packing Co., Pump Parts & Packing Ascot Busin~ss Systems, Forms $ Associated Concrete Products, Manhole Sections Assoc. of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, Membership Atlas Stationers, Office Supplies Authorizec Supply Corp., Chlorinator Parts Azusa Western, Inc., Concrete Gerry Baldwin, Employee Mileage Bank of America, Bond & Coupon Coll. Bay City Bearing Co., Inc., Small Hardware Beacon Auto Parts, Truck Repair Beckman Instruments, Inc., Controls Bird Machine Co., Equipment Parts Blower Paper Co., Janitorial Supplies Bristol Park Medical Group, Employment Exams Charles Bruning Co., Reproduction Supplies C-L Chemical Co., Chemicals AMOUNT --- 32.00 21.55 791.18 525.00 142.66 12.50 33.55 24.68 361.28 354.80 21. 74 1, 041. 00 l~4. 61 29.78 62.72 50.40 2,599.52 55.25 6l~. 87 110.46 12.82 81.24 12.50 161.58 Calif. Precast Concrete Pipe Assn., Seminar Registration Calif. Wholesale Electric, Electrical Supplies 56.31 60.00 44.91 Certified Building Materials, Cement & Sand Chrome Crankshaft Co., Machining Brian Chuchuas Co., Truck Parts Classified Transfer Co., Inc., Relocate Machinery Coast Office Equipment, Office Equipment College Lumber Co., Inc., S~all Hardware Continenta 1-Emsco Co., Engine Pp.rts · Consolidated Electrical Dist., Electri~al Supplies Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts CWPCA 1970 Conference, Conf. Registration Daniels Tire Service, Tire Repair John M. Deck Co., Small Engine DeGuelle & Son 1.s Glass Co., Sma 11 Hardware A. B. Dick Co., Reproduction Supplies Domestic Air Express, Inc., Air Freight Clark Dye Hardware, Small Tools Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Electronic Balancing Co., Conveyor Repair Electric Supplies Dist., Electrical Supplies Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring Enterprise Printing Co., Office Supplies Ensign Products Co., Maintenance Supplies Fischer & Porter Co., Controls & Chlor. Parts Fow·ler Equipment Inc., Crane Ren ta 1 Frederick Pump & Engr., Pump Parts City of Fullerton, Water Garvin's Paint & Body Shop, Paint Trucks Gar Wood-L.fa .. Truck Equip., In~., Truck Parts General Air Equipment,. Compress~r Parts Ge 11eral Electric Supply Co., Electr:i.ca l Supplies Ge~eral Telephone Co. Geoq~ia Pacific Corp., Chlorine -f\ ~- 117.34 22.50 20.0h 16.oo 33.18 108.53 94.92 130.66 271-!..83 206.00 25.00 97.26 31.05 25.39 28.19 12.47 11+6. 69 55.00 1,321.59 3,742.50 52.31 108.50 1,194.82 782.50 138.43 3.85 597.00 258.83 135.08 1,239.01 1,260.25 11, 697. 5'+ · WARRANT NO. ·13060 13061 13062 13063 13064 13065 ~ 13066 13067 13068 13069 13070 13071 13072 13073 13074 13075 13076 13077 13078 1307Q 13080 13081 13082 13083 13084 13085 13086 13087 13088 13089 13090 ~ 13091 13092 13093 13094 ·.13095 13096 13097 13098 13099 13100 13101 13102 13103 13104 13105 13106 13107 13108 13109 13110 13111 13112 13113 13114 13115 ~13116 13117 13118 13119 13120 IN FAVOR OF Glidden-Durkee, Paints $ Globe Ice Machine Co., Chlor. Parts Golden West Fertilizer Co., Grit Disposal Goodall Rubber Co., Small Hardware Bob Gosche Co., Small H~rdware Graybar Electric Co., Test Equipment Guardian Fence Co., Relocate Fence Hanson, Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester, Audit Services Harbor Clinic, Pre-employment Physicals Fred A. Harper, Various Mtg. & C.O.D. Expenses Heard Equipment Co., Equipment Parts Honeywell, Inc., Telemetry Supplies Howard Supply Co., Small Hardware & Piping Supplies City of Huntington Beach, Water International Harvester ·co., True~ Parts Jim's Tool Crib, s~all Tools Kar Products, Inc., Small Hardware Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Piping Fred Keiser, Employee Mileage (3 Mo.) King Bearing, Inc., Bearings Kleen-Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Tools LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies & Small Tools L & N Unfiorm Supply Co., Uniform Service Anthony J. Lauricha, Reimb. OJT Expense Lawless Detroit Diesel, Tractor Parts Judy Lee, Employee Mileage ·H. J. Lorenz Co., Controls Chas. Lowe Co., Pump Parts Mccalla Bros., Pump Parts R. W. McClellan & Sons, Sand & Road Base Dennis May, Employee Mileage Meter Components, New Meter E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole· Ring & Cover Herbert A. Moss, Labor Counsel Retainer National Chemsearch Corp., Solv~nts National Concrete Sawing, Inc., Core Drilling City of Newport Beach, Water Noland Paper Co., Inc., Reproduction Supplies ODA Nursery, Shrubbery · Oakite Products, Inc., Maintenance Supplies o. C. Suppliers, Inc., Small Hardware Everett Oliphant, Reimb. OJT Expense Co. of Or. Auditor-Cont., Juv. Court Program Or. Co. Door Closer Service, Lock Repair Orange County Radiotelephone Co. Pacific Telephone Co. Gregg T. Pamson, Reimb. OJT Expense L.B. Penhall Co., Inc., Core Drilling Postmaster, Postage Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage (2 Mos.) Pryor-Giggey Co., Cement Reliable Sheet Metal Works, Metal Work Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Steel Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Parts Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Rewind Sarco Co., Inc., Small Hardware Shell Oil Co., Gasoline The Sherwin-Williams Co., Paint & Supplies A.H. Shipkey, Inc., Truck Tires -B- AMOUNT 93.47 25.62 . 1, 056. 00 . 68. 25 99.70 153.83 605.00 532.50 65.00 137.79 18.95 175.54 2,440.30. 7.30 86.57 82.06 41.19 1,204.60 20.80 112.41 164.50 252.12 1,253.63 833.39 266.10 55.13 17.90 130.20 11.07 173.57 147.00 13.00 268.80 234.15 250.00 563.06 112.50 9.4h 212. ln 18.90 185.96 50.46 15.00 300.00 34.69 290.85 361.80 15.00 65.00 200.00 68.30 11.50 411. 60 582.03 406.81 100.80 419.88 18.95 78lt.56 589.39 150.71 _,_ WARRANT NO. 13121 13122 13123 13124 13125 13126 '-' 13127 13128 13129 13130 13131 13132 13133 13134 13135 13136 13137 13138 13139 13140 13141 13142 13143 13141+ 131l~5 13146 13147 13148 13149 13150 13151 13152 13153 1315L~ 13155 13156 13157 13158 ~3159 IN FAVOR OF John Sigler, Employee Mileage $ AMOUNT 11.40 12,455.21 3.52 764.30 27.83 87.47 379.08 523.22 124.oo So.· Calif. Edison Co. So. Calif. Water Co. So. Counties Gas Co. Southern Marine Supply, Small Hardware Sparkletts Drinking Wat~r Corp., Bottled Water Speed-E-Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Oil Co., Engine Oil State of Calif. PERS, Ret. System Adm. Fee Gary G. Streed, Employee Mileage Surveyors Service Co., Survey Supplies T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Truck & Tractor Parts C. O. Thompson Petroleum Co., Kerosene & Weed Oil Tiernan's Office Equipment, Office Equipment Tony's Lock & Safe Service, Small Hardware Tustin Water Works, Line Cleaning Water University Club, Lodging FWPCA Seminar Utilities Supply Co., Small Hardware Valvate Associates, Small Hardware Vaniman Camera Shop, Photo Processing & Supplies Wallace Trade Bindery Co., Office Supplies .John R. Waples R.S., Odor Consultant Western Belting, Small Hardware Willig Equipment, Tractor Parts Michael Wilson, Employee Mileage (2 Mos.) Wilson Engine & Equip. Co., Engine Parts Work Travel Bureau, Inc., Travel -Various Mtgs. Don Wright, Employee Mileage Xerox Corp., Reproduction Service (2 Mos.) Ray S. Young, Reimb. OJT Expense C. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel Retainer TOTAL JOINT OPERATING CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARHANTS IN FAVOR OF 34.80 18.69 75.61 241.36 786.61 18.38 127.02 54.10 37.54 38.38 50.84 lQ.50 221.70 102.91 169.09 44.40 1,687.26 169.52 62.80 1,600.63 15.00 700.00 $ 68,506.38 John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Services-Flt. Const. $ J. E. & W. W. Hoagland, Contractor P2-14 4,841. 94 86,028.00 185,223.60 16,470.00 106.oo 196.66 Peter Kiewit Sons' Co., Contractor J-10 Lamar Corp., Contractor Pl-ll~ Twining Labs, Testing Pl-14 & P2-14 Wallace Trade Bindery Co., PJ.-15, P2-15, P2-16 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING OCEAN OUTFALL #2 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION REVOLVING FUND IN.FAVOR OF Osborne Labs, Inc·., Inspection J-10 Parker Diving Service, Inspection J-10 TOTAL INSPECTION REVOLVING TOTAL JOINT HARRJ\NTS -c- $ 292,866.20 $ $ 1,000.00 534.66 ---- 1,534.66 $ 362,907.24 _,~ WARRANT NO. 13160 13161 ~ 13162 13163 13164 13165 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF County of Orange Auditor-Controller, Testing 2-13 Southern Counties Gas Co., Relocate line 2-13 DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Cook & Barletta, Inc., Contractor 3-15 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 3-11 & 3-14 Joseph A. Mueller, M.A.I., Appraisal 3-12 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF City of Newport Beach, Connection Charge Admn. -D- $ $ $ $ AMOUNT 297.76 1,342.00 1,639.76 895.05 3,205.20 2,830.00 $ 6,035.20 $ 6,930.25 272.00 272.00 WARRANT NO. 13166 13167 "'.3168 ~3169 13170 13171 13172 13172A 13173 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engr. Serv. A.D.#8 & Plan Boyle and Lowry, Plan Check and Inspection Freedom Newspapers, Inc., Notice of Polls The Tustin News, Notice of Polls Check ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engr. Serv. 7-2AP-l The Irvine Company, Line Relocation 7-2R Scott Bros. Construction, Inc., Contractor 7-2AP-l FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engr. Serv. 7-lF-B . DISTRICT NO. 11 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Wallace Trade Bindery Co., Plans & Specs. 11-11 -E- $ $ $ AMOUNT 676.11 152.00 516.70 858.03 2,202.84 1,108.00 1,785.98 26,658.00 $ 29,551.98 $ 67.50 67.50 $ 31,822.32 $ 53.66 $ 53.66 OFFICERS Chairman, Executive Committee LAWRE.SCE A. PETERSEN Union Banlc President }AMES BEA~{ first National Bank of Orange County First Vice President E. H. FI:->STI::I\ Boyle Engineering Second Vice Pre.1icle11t Joux B. MEnllF.LI. 11 Wyatt & Merrell, Attorneys at Law 1'reasurcr LLOYD STOCKEi\ Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. President, Senators Club Nov£1. }A~ti::s Jam<-S De·.·elop!:lent Company DIRECTORS ~fns. }EA:->:->ETTE BAXOC'l.1 Radio Statior. KNOB jA:O.!ES HEA~I first National Bank of Orange County G1::oncE F. Jh:nn:i. Duryea, Corp"nter & Ba•r.es HEHHF.l\T L. V. COFFEY Recltor·Apprai~er R. A. DAILY Delco Battdy AL II. EsKHIDGE Ben\: o! Am<:rica JACK Fu:11Ax Southern Ccunt:es Ga~ Ccmp·;ny E. JI. F1:-.sn:n Boyle Engi::.ce:ing Ju-iTL'S c. GATES Hughes Aircra!t Ccmpan;· HEHXAHD JIA:->SEX Dlsm·yland PCJrk "'-"" Jonx 1 L\sKEl.L BE-eco, Ltd. PAuL T. }011.ssTO:-> St. Joseph Hospotal Fi-:x1·0:-; E. Jox~:s Mun:cipcl Court Judgl', V/estem Orange County Lrnx H. Jo:-a-:s Jones, Ellictt c:rr:d Asscdatcs Et:CE:\E \'. KAl>O\\" fountc:r:n V:::ll<>y L,..,:-.d Co. GEOHGE KELl.OC:<: Imperial High·,.,·ay Associctio:: CAnL KY:o.tLA Moulton-NiguPl '.'la!···r Di:;!rict \VJLL II. L1:-.1JS..\Y, Jn. Consult;ng Er.g1r,,,•·r H. \\'. Lr:--Tox Norland C0r;>or!ion. 51'bsidi:iry North Am<:ricac. R~cb"el! Cc·rr. RouE1n F. \k:Ccmw Ncwpcr! }.'.cr:ne S'..:p;;ly Com; . .::r:y Jo11x B. \lu1m:LL 11 W)·att & 11.e;rdl. /..:t:::rn~·;s c! L-:w LELA:-.:o E. \!nun: Ana';d:11 Scdngs & Loc::1 A>se>::-iation !\AT }{. :\i:FF Nat Ne!! En1ir.0..r:r.g Corr.r any Jo11x l' . .\llKEH PBS C".>rp:;rction LAWJIE'>;CE A. l'1·:TE11;;1.:x Ur.k•t• R.1nlc DALE !'thT Fir~t A!::c: icon Ti1:0 lnsur ~nee C"rr.p•::n y LLOYJ) JI. STOCKEi\ Pcwt 1 .. !a:-w;c):, Mi~ch-::11 & c~. AHTilCI\ \\'. \\'AG:"EI\ Ralph C. Si.:~r::> Cnmp-:::1y Gi:onc;1: \VATTS Al!stutc lnsurc:c.c·~ C"mrany PAl:L \\'urn: . Co:nprr:hcn!:!ve He:il!h Pl 1:.ni:i(J Ar.!;oc~ation ANGE COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 1477 SOUTH MANCHESTER AVE., ANAHEIM, CALIF. 92802 (714) 77 4-2851 Mr'. Clifton C. Miller, Chair~an Joint Boards of Directors Orange County Sanitation District P .o. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. Miller: April 1, 1970 The enclosed resolution was approved by the Executive Committee, Board of Directors of the Orange County Chamber of Commerce at a special rreeting on Wednesday, April 1st and represents the official position of this Chamber in regard to the proposed Orange County Sanitation Districts' Ordinance relating to connection to and use of Distric,ts' ·sewerage facilities. Very truly yours, L. D. Truhill Executive Vice President cc: Fred A. Harper, General Manager .. • ._,,,,. . March 31, 1970 TO: Board of Directors, Orange County Sanitation Districts FROM: Board of Directors, Orange County Chamber of Comrrerce SUBJECT: ·Resolution regarding Proposed Sanitation District Ordinance Relating to Connection to and Uses of District's Sewerage Facilities. WHEREAS, it is agreed that it is in the public interest that an Ordinance be enacted to regulate the quality and quantity of sewage and industrial waste discharge into the Orange County Sanitation District's facilities and WHEREAS, the Orange County Sanitation District's Board of Directors at its regular meetine on September 10, 1969 requested the Orange County Chamber of Commerce to organize an Ad Hoc committee to assist in drafting an Ordinance which would be acceptable to comrr.ercial, rranufacturing, other firms and organizations who discharge large volumes of water, solids and chemicals in the Orange County Sanitation District's facilities and WHEREAS, from September 10, 1969 the Ad Hoc Committee and it's nurnel"'OUS subcommittees have Spent many hours studying a proposed San~tation Distl;'ict Ordinance and numerous hours working in a cooperative effort with the District's staff in developing fair and equitable rules and reeulations relating to connection to and use of the District's Sewerage Facilities and WHEREAS, on ~~rch 9, 1970 over 700 industries in Orange County were invited to attend the final meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee at which time the proposed ordinance ·was read and discussed in detail, and WHEREAS, at this meeting a broad spectrum of rr.anufacturing, commercial and other types of firms were present and voiced their unani- rrous approval of the proposed ordinance, with a recommendation that the $100 appeal fee be refunded if the appeal is successful, NOW BE IT RESOLVED, that the Orange County Chamber of Commerce urge the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District to approve the passage of the Ordinance as drafted on March 10, 1970 which establishes rules and rer;ulations relating to connection and use of district sewerage facilities, qua~ity criteria, page 2 March 31, 1970 Sanitation District Ordinance Resolution reasonable use criteria, charges for connection to and use of district's sewerage facilities and provide penalties for violation of this ordinance with the recommendation that the $100 appeal fee be refunded if the appeal is successful. DISTRIBUTION: Action copies to: Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District Inforrrational copies to: Steering Committee of the Ad Hoc Committee on Sanitation APPROVED BY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY CHA!IBER OF COMMERCE APRIL 1, 1970 1 f Staff 's Su gp;ested Changes in March 10 , 1970 Draft of Connectj_on and Use Ordina nce l).-8--70 Pag e 5) Article 3 ( e ) · Rev ise to r ead (added wording under l ined ; deleted wording in parentheses ): rr ( e) Industri a.l Was t e Di s charg e Permit -Ap plication for a permit to use District servic e s and facilities for the treatment and disposal of industrial waste of more than 25~0 gall ons uer day for ar~1l.__gpera.tion shall be made to the District. Application for d i s c h~rge of industrial waste of less than 25,000 ga llons .-eer day for an..Y_Qpe ration shall be made when the operation in which the industrj_al wa ste orig i n2.te s is kr1ov-m o~ fotmd to inyolve disposal of comp_sme nts wh ich ma y _exce ed the guali ty_~ir ements set forth in Articl ~ L~ he reof . 1rhe permit s ha ll be issued by the District and shall be in accor dance with the provi - sions of Articles 4 and 5 hereof. The permit may require t he permitte e to provide necessary p:ce-treatment facilities to ins u r e compli ance with Articles 4 and 5 hereof . Any such requiremen t shall be s e t fort h in the (industrial waste discharge) permi t ." Pa_g_e 7, Article 6(b) Revise the first sentence to read (added wording underlined ): "Except as h e r ein provided) no perrni.t to use , for the di s po sal of industrial waste, a connection to a f ac ility of ---...:." Pages 9 through 12, Articles 7, 9, 11, 12 Wherever the word 11permittee " occurs, substitute "user 11 • Pa g e~ Article 8, third line After word r•owned 11 add "or l e ased ". Page 1 0, Article 8 , l as t line At the end of Article add ",provided how- ever , that such property is not used for proprietary purpos e s ." Page 10, Article 9 (b) Revise fi rst sentence to r ead (added wording unde r- l ined): "The d e terminati on of peak flow rate s hall b e made by mean s of an efflue nt meter approved by the General Manager, and instal l e d a nd ~ai nt aine d at the expense of the user, or by field measureme nts made by the District or by the me thod·provi d ed in Artic l e 2 hereof . P.9-ge 14, Article 19 Re vis e to read (added wording under lined): Ordinanc es Nos . are h e reby r epea l ed ·on the effective date h e r eof and all ordinances o r parts of ordinances II ------• ---- ORDINANCE NOo DRAFT 2-2-70 Revo 2-9-70 Revo 3-3-70 Rev. 3-10-70 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO CONNECTION AND USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES, QUALITY CRITERIA, REASONABLE USE CRITERIA, CHARGES FOR CONNECTION TO AND USE OF DISTRICTVS SEWERAGE FACILITIES, PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NOo The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District Noc , of Orange County, California, does ordain as follows: ARTICLE 1 -PURPOSE The purpose of this ordinance is to provide for the maximum public benefit from the use of the District's facilities by regulating the quality and quantity of sewage and industrial waste discharged thereto and to provide for charges for the use thereof when such use is disproportionate to District costs imposed on other property within the District. The revenues to be derived from the application of this ordinance shall be used to defray the costs of, including the repayment of principal and interest on bonds issued for the acquisition, construction or reconstruction and the maintenance of an a~equate sewerage system to serve the territory of the District excepting that no revenues derived from this ordinance shall be used for the acquisition.or con- struction of new local street sewers or laterals as distinguished from main trunk interceptor and outfall sewers. ARTICLE 2 -DEFINITION~ (a) Assessed Valuation -Shall mean that portion of the total assessed valuation of the property producing and discharging sewage or industrial waste upon which District taxes are levied in the fiscal year b~ginning in the calendar year in which the discharge takes place. Property producing and discharging sc:wage or ,industrial waste shall include all the real property and improvements in the Distri<?t used, owned, leased, occupied or maj_ntained by or for the user whether or not sewage or industrj.al waste is generated by a Agenda Item 15 F-1 All Dintricts -· particular improvement and shall include, but not be limited to, offices, landscaped areas, parking lots, warehouses and incidental improvements. It shall also include unimproved land located in the District when such land is used, owned, leased, occupied or maintained by the user. For property upon which no District tax is levied, the assessed valuation will be considered to be zero. ---- (b) District -Shall mean County Sanitation District Noo , of Orange Countyo (c) General Manager -Shall mean the individual duly designated by the Board of Directors of the District to administer this ordinance. (a) Industrial Waste -Shall mean the waterborne waste and wastewater from any producing, manufacturing, or processing operation ·of whatever nature, including institutional and commercial operations where water is used for laundering, vehicle cleaning, or the removal of significant quantities of wastes of non-human origin. (e) Local Sewering Agency -Shall mean any public corporation ~ duly authorized under the laws of the State of California to construct and/or maintain public sewerso (f) Excess Capacity -Shall mean the hydraulic use of a District facility for peak flow rate.greater than reasonable useo (g) Peak Flow Rate -Shall mean the annually determined highest flow rate of sewage or industrial waste discha~"'."'ged to a public sewer over a period of ai least 15 minutes at any time during the preceding 12-month period. In the absence of actual peak flow rate data, peak flow rate may be considered at 1.6 times the greatest metered eight-hour water use during the preceding 12-month period, provided that where peak flow rate is established for permittees on the effective date of this ordinance, the permittee certifies that said eight-hour water use was for normal operations and not the result of extraordinary circumstances~ -2- (h) Pre-Treatment Facility -Shall mean any works or device for the treatment or flow limitation of sewage or industrial waste, prior to discharge into a public sewer. (i) Public Corporation -Shall mean any City, District, or other public agency duly organized under the laws of the State of California. (j) Reasonable Use -Shall mean the rate of discharge of sewage or industrial waste and the suspended solids contained therein to which a user connected to a public sewer shall be entitled to discharge to said sewer without payment of excess capacity connection charges or use charges by virtue of the assessed valuation of said property and other criteriao For the purpose of computing excess capacity connection charges, reasonable use is hereby established at 25,000 gallons per day peak flow rate per $100,000 of assessed valuation. For purposes of computing use charges, reasonable use is hereby established at 10 million gallons per year and 15 dry tons of suspended solids per year per $100,000 of assessed valuationo In the event a person producing sewage or industrial waste maintains more than one operation in the District, peak flow rate, annual flow, annual suspended solids and assessed valuation shall be combined for all such operations for the purpose of determining reasonable use and computing excess capacity connection charges and use chargeso (k) Sewage -Sha~l mean the wastewater derived from human use of buildings for ordinary residential, institutional or commercial purposes. (1) Standard Methods -Shall mean procedures described in the Twelfth edition of 11 Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater" as publ:tshed by the American Publtc Health Association, the ·American Water Works Association and the. Water Pollution Control Federation. (m) Suspended Solids -Shall mean any insoluble solid matter contained as a component of sewage or industrial waste and capable of separation from the liqutd portion of said waste by laboratory filtra- -3- tion, provided, however, no insoluble solid matter shall be included if permittee can demonstrate that it is non-putrescible and results from planned water conservation or reuse within the premises of permittee. (n) User -Shall mean a~y person or public corporation discharging sewage or industrial waste to a sewerage facility of the District or to a sewerage facility of a local sewering agency, which facility discharges to a District facilityo ARTICLE 3 -PERMITS (a) When Required -No person or public corporation shall be permitted to connect to, use, or maintain a connection to the sewerage facilities of the District without the permits required and issued as hereinafter provided. No person or public corporation shall be permitted to use or maintain a connection for the discharge of industrial waste to a sewerage facility of a local sewering agency, which facility discharges to a District sewerage facility, without a valid permit issued as hereinafter providedo (b) Condition Precedent -No permit shall be valid unless the real property to be served by use of the permit is included within the boundaries of th~ Dist~ict and w~thin the boundaries of a local sewering agency authorized to maintain public sewerage works; provided, however, a permit may be issued for property to be served outside the boundaries of a local sew~ring agency if a local sewering agency makes application for the issuance of such permit. (c) Information to be Furnished -The District may require, in connection with any application for a permit, that the applicant furnish data regarding present and anticipated future flows, quality of discharge and information concerning present and anticipated assessed valuation. (d) Permit for Connection To and Use of District Facility -· Application for such permit shall be made to the D:"Lstrict and permtts shall be issued by the District in two parts: First, ·a connection permit for the purpose of authorizing connection to a District's sewerage facility under conditions set forth in said permit; and secondly, a use permit for discharging sewage and industrial waste to the District's sewerage facility. (1) A new connection permit is not required for existing connections to District's sewerage facilitieso (2) The connection permit may prescribe requirements as to the type of connection and the use permit may require the provision of pre-treatment facilities necessary to insure compliance with Articles 4 and 5 hereof. Any such requirements shall be set forth in the permit. (e) Industrial Waste Discharge Permit -Application for a permit to use District services and facilities for the treatment and ·aisposal of industrial waste shall be made to the Districto The permit shall be issued by the District and shall be in accordance with the provisions of Articles 4 and 5 hereof. The permit may require the permittee to provide necessary pre-treatment facilities to insure ,._, compliance with Articles 4 and 5 hereof. Any such requirement shall be set forth in the industrial waste discharge permito (f) Amendment of Permits Any permit issued under the provisions of this Article.3 may be amended by the District after giving to the permittee a thirty (30) ~ay notice of intention to amend wher~ the permit given was based on incorrect information and the proposed amendment is for the purp.ose of making the perrni t conform to the actual factors involved as determined by the General Manager. ARTICLE 4 -QUALITY REQUIREMEN 1rs (a) Substances Prohibited -No person or public corporation shall discharge sewage or industrial waste into a District sewerage facility or into a local sewering agency facility, which facility discharges to a District facility·, when the components of such effluent cause the effluent to exceed the limits set forth herein or are in· violation of the rules and regulations of the District established as hereinafter provided. -5- (1) An eight-hour temperature average higher than 140°F (2) More than 100 milligrams per liter of hexane soluble material {fats and oils) or 25 milligrams per liter (3) ( 4) of floatable oil both based on an average concentration over an eight-hour period A pH of less than·6.o provided that at least BCP/> or the time in any eight-hour period, the pH shall be not less than 605 Suspended solids or other substances or such a character or in such concentrations which result in improper functioning of any public sewer through which said solids are conveyed or in the improper operation of the Districts' treatment facilities (5) Any liquid or gas or other substance which, singly or in combination with other substances, could cause an explosive, dangerously radioactive, or toxic condition in the sew~rage system of the Districto (b) Rain Water Prohibited -. No person or publi'c corporation shall discharge or cause to be discharged to a District sewerage facility or to a local sewering agency facility, which facility dis- charges to a District facility, wate~ from roof drains or other runoff water from rain storms or unconta~inated water not classified as sewage or industrial waste. {c) Additional Rules and Regulations -The General Manager of the District shall, from time to time as he deems necessary, prepare additional regulations as to the quality of sewage or industrial waste discharged to the sewerage facilities of the District or to the sewerage facilities of a local sewering agency, which facility dis- charges into a District facility" Said regulat:lons shall be for the · purpose of insuring that sewage or industrial waste so discharged will ~ not cause undue maintenance in the District's facilities, interfere with proper operation of the ·treatment plants, produce a noxious or malodorous gas, create a public nuisance, create hazards to structures, equipment and personnel, or create a violittion of the requirements -6- imposed upon the District by Federal, ·state or local regulatory agencies. Said regulations shall not be effective until after public hearing and approval by resolution of the Board of Directors. The General Manager shall, thirty days before formal consideration of such resolution, mail a notice of such consideration to each person holding a valid industrial waste discharge permito Such notice shall also be mailed to any person who has filed with the District a request for such notice. ARTICLE 5 -QUANTITY REQUIREMENTS In order to provide for reasonable use of the District's sewerage facilities and in recognition of the fact that the transmission, treat- ment and disposal of domestic sewage is the highest and best use of the District's sewerage facilities, the General Manager may set forth, in any industrial waste discharge permit issued, requirements to limit the quantity of industrial waste discharged to a sewerage facility of the District or a local sewering agency when, in the opinion of the General Manager, the existing hydraulic capacity of the' District's sewerage facilities would be unreasonably used. Such requirements may limit the quantity of industrial wastes to be discharged with respect to any given unit of time and shall be subject to appeal as provided in Article 12 hereof. ARTICLE 6 -PERMIT FEES AND CHARGES FOR CONNECTION AND USE (a) Connection Permit Fees -No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a permit fee is paid by the applicant, provided, however, that such fee shall not be payable when a permit is issued for the reconnection or alteration of an existing cqnnection made by the District or at the request of the District. Said permit fee shall ·be an amount set ,__.. forth in a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors. (b) Industrial Waste Discharge Permit Fees and Excess Capacity Connection Charges for Use Greater than Reasonable Use -Except as hereinafter provided, no.permit to use a connection to a facility of -7- the District or to a sewerage facility of a local sewering agency, which facility discharges into a District facility, shall, after the effective date of this ordinance, be issued until an industrial waste discharge permit fee is paid by the applicanto An industrial waste discharge permit fee shall be pa~able in an amount set forth in a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors and shall be based on the volume and characteristics of the industrial waste but in no event shall exceed $250 per year. Industrial waste permit fees shall be payable annually within thirty days after expiration date and upon invoicing by the District. Prior to commencement of use and upon invoicing by the District, an excess capacity connection charge shall be payable by a user when, during the 12-month period after commencement of use, the peak flow rate may be reasonably expected to exceed 25,000 gallons per day unless such peak flow rate is a reasonable use as defined in Article 2 of this ordinance. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, no excess capacity connection charge shall be made for connections in use on the effective date of this ordinance unless there is an increase in peak flow rates of sewage and indus~rial waste which exceeds, by more than 5,000 gallons per day, the highest peak flow rate previously determined for such user. Subject to the provisions hereinabove, excess capacity connection charges payable shall be computed at the rate of $350 per 1,000 gallons per day of peak flow rate and, in the case of connections in use on the effective date of this ordinance, shall be payable on the lesser of the following amounts: (1) The amount the latest determined peak flow rate exceeds that determined for the 12-month period preceding the effective date of this ordinance or (2) The amount the latest determined peak flow rate exceeds the reasonable peak flow rate determined at the time of the increaseo -8- (c) Use Charges -Any person using a connection to a facility of the District or a facility of a local sewering agency, which facility discharges to a District facility, shall be subject to the payment of an annual use charge for the preceding calendar yearo Such use charge shall be payable only on the·annual flow of sewage or industrial waste discharged or suspended solids discharged greater than reasonable use as hereinbefore defined. The use charge shall be the actual treatment costs of the District for the fiscal year ending in said calendar year expressed per 1,000 gallons in excess of reasonable use and $10 per ton of suspended solids in excess of reasonable use. (d) Computation and Invoicing of Use Charges -After January 1 of each calendar year, the General Manager shall determine which users are subject to the payment of use charges and shall invoice the user in accordance with the mit charges established as hereinabove provided. At the option of the General Manager, ·use charges may be invoiced more frequently than annually when, in his judgment, the use charges are of such a magnitude to warrant more frequent payment. Upon application by any person to the Board of Directors, which application demonstrates a financial hardship, the Board of Directors may allow the payment of excess capacity connection charges to be made over a period of not more than five years with interes~ at six percent per annum on the unpaid balance . . ARTICLE 7 -REFUND OF EXCESS CAPACITY CONNECTION CHARGES Upon application to the Board of Directors by any permittee who has paid excess capacity connection charges to the District of more than $5,000, which application certifies that the peak flow rate has permanently decreased by 25 percent or more, and which application is not disputed by the General Manager, the Board of Directors will autho- rize a refund to the applicant. The refund will be computed to maintain the total remaining excess capacity connection charge paid to an amount corresponding to the excess capacity connection charge payable at the time of the decrease. -9- •. ARTICLE 8 -LOCAL AGENCY EXEMPTION FROM CHARGES No excess capacity connection charges or use charges, as speci- fied in Article 6 hereof, shall be payable for the discharge of sewage or industrial waste from property in the District owned by elementary, high school, and junior college school districts, special districts, the County of Orange, and cities. ARTICLE 9 -MEASUREMENT OF QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF FLOWS (a) Annual Flow -The measurement of annual flow of sewage or industrial waste shall be made by the District by means of a metering device, approved by the General Manager, and installed and maintained at the expense of the permittee, or by estimate arrived at from total water used in the area occupied, or by other means acceptable to the General Manager and to the permittee. The permittee shall have the option of selecting whether the measurement shall be made by meter, or by estimate, or other means, provided that the method of estimate or . other means is approved by the General Manager. (b) Peak Flow Rate -The determination of peak flow rate shall be made by means of an effluent meter approved by the General Manager or by field measurements made by the District or by the method provided in Article 2 hereof. The permittee shall have the option of selecting the method of determination to be used, provided, however, that in the event the field measurement is selected, an additional charge of $600 per year will be made to defray the costs thereof and will be invoiced each February 1 for the preceding calendar year. (c) Deterr.ination of Components -The determination or estimation of suspended solids or other components contained in sewage or industrial waste discharges shall be by one of the following methods: (1) Sampling and analysis by Distri~t's personnelo (2) Sampling and analysis by personnel of permittee or laboratory acceptable to the District and employed by the permittee. (3) Estimates arrived at by study of operations leading to the discharge. -10- The permittee shall have the opticn of selecting which of the foregoing methods will be used, provided, however, that such method must be proposed by permittee and approved by the General Manager before January 1 of any calendar year and continued through- out the year. In the event no method is so selected and approved, Method (1) will be used. Also in the event that either Method (2) or (3) is so selected and approved, the District may, by appropriate sampling and analysis, determine the accuracy of the results obtained. If Method (2) is so selected and approved, the permittee shall pre- pare and submit on, or before, January 15 of any year, a certified statement of the results obtained for the preceding year. All laboratory procedures shall strictly conform to Standard Methodso ARTICLE 10 -INSPECTION The General Manager shall institute a regular industrial waste inspection program in order to determine the quality and quantity . of industrial waste discharged to the District's facilities and the .._,. effect thereof on the maintenance and operation of said facilities. Said inspection program shall be carried out by employees of the District and, insofar as possible, shall be funded from industrial waste permit feeso ARTICLE 11 -AGREEMENTS WITH PERMITTEES (a) New Installations -At the option of the General Manager or the permittee, the District will enter into an agreement with any permittee whose assessed valuation and peak flow rate cannot be deter- mined at the time of the issuance of the permit. Such an agreement will provide for an estimate of the assessed valuation for the ensuing fiscal year and the peak flow rate for the ensuing 12-month period, and require payment of excess capacity connection charges on the basis of such estimates and will· provide for a method of additional payment or refund, as the case may be, of such charges when actual data as to assessed valuation and peak flow rate can be obtainedo -11- ... (b) Special Situations -If any permittee feels that the circum- stances involved in his discharge are of a nature which requires special consideration, he may apply to the Board of Directors for a special agreement. Such application shall state the facts to warrant such special agreement which may; upon resolution of the Board of Directors, provide terms other than contained in this ordinanceo (c) Existing Agreements -It is recognized that the District may have special agreements for the discharge of sewage or industrial waste to its facilities in effect on the effective date of this ordinance. In such cases, the user shall have the option of maintaining the existing agreement or to terminate it. In the event of termination, the provisions of this ordinance will apply to permittee 1 s dischargeo ARTICLE 12 -INTERPRETATION AND APPEAL (a) Request for Ruling -If any permittee or applicant for a permit disputes the interpretation or application of this ordinance, • he shall set forth his contentions in writing to the General Managero The General Manager shall, within thirty days, respond in writing to the contentions so made and set forth his determinations thereof. (b) Appeal -If the permittee or applicant for a permit is dissatisfied with the determinations ·so made by the General Manager, he may within thirty days after mailing of said ruling by the General Manager to said permittee or applicant for a permit, appeal said ruling by giving written notice of the basis of his appeal to the Board of Directors of the Districto Said written notice shall be accompanied by a non-refundable fee of ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100). The Board of Directors of the District shall, within forty-five days after receipt of said written notice of appeal, make a final determination of the issues presented. ARTICLE 13 -PAYMENT OF CHARGES AND DELINQUENCIES All charges made pursuant to the provisions of this ordinance are due and payable upon receipt of notj_cc thereof. All such charges shall be and become delinquent forty-five days after mailing or -12- delivering notice thereof to the mailing address of the property subject to such charges. All delinquent charges shall be deemed a violation of this ordinance and each day any such charge remains delinquent shall be deemed a separate violation. ARTICLE 14 -PENALTIES Any charge that becomes delinquent shall have added to it a penalty charge equal to ten percent of the charge that became delinquent and thereafter an additional penalty shall accrue on the total charge due, including the ten percent basic penalty at the rate of one-half of one percent per month until paid. ARTICLE 15 -COLLECTION Upon motion by the Board of Directors of the District, any charge and all penalties thereon shall be collected by lawsuit in the name of the District. A.n? such action for collection may include an application for an injunction to p~event repeated and reoccurring violations of this ordinance. ARTICLE 16 -VIOLATIONS No person or public corporation shall violate any provisions or fail .to comply with any of the requirements of this ordinance. Any person or public corporation violating any of the provisions or failing to comply with any of the requirements of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Any person or corporation convicted of a misdemeanor under the provisions of this ordinance shall be punished by a fine of not more than $100~00 or by imprisonment in the County Jail for a period not exceeding thirty days, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each person or public corporation shall be guilty of a separate offense for each .and every day during any pcrtion of whi.ch any violation of any provision of this ordinance is committed, continued or permitted by such person or public corporation and shall be punishable accordingly. -13- ARTICLE 17 -SEVERABILITY If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held unconstitutional, the remainder of the ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall not be affected thereby. If a provision of this ordinance is held invalid, all valid provisions that are severable from the invalid provision shall remain in effecto ARTICLE 18 -PROCEDURES FOR AMENDMENT Thirty days before any formal consideration of an amendment to this ordinance by the Board of Directors, the General Manager will so notify in writing each city and local sewering agency in the District and each person holding a valid industrial waste discharge permit or who has paid an excess capacity connection chargeo Such notice shall also be mailed to any person who has filed with the District a request for such notice. Such notice shall contain a brief description of the nature of the amendment to be considered. ARTICLE 19 -REPEAL Ordinances Nos. ----~~~--~~- are hereby repealed and all ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent that they are inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance. ARTICLE 20 -EFFECTIVE DATE The effective date of this ordinance is January 1, 19710 -14- RESOLUTION NO. 7C-57 DECLARA11ION OF INTEI1rrION TO MAINTAIN CHARGES FOR CONNECTION TO AND USE OF DISTRICTS' SEWERAGE FACILITIES COMPARABLE W.LTH THOSE OF THE COUl'F.I1Y SANITATION DISTRiC11S OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, DECLARING INTENTION TO MAINTAIN COMPARABLE CHARGES FOR CONNECTION TO AND USE OF DISTRICTS' SEWERA.GE FACILITIES WITH THOSE OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY BY MEANS OF AMENDMENT, IF NECESSARY, TO THE UNIFORM ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO CONNECTION AND USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES, QUALITY CRITERIA, REASONABLE USE CRITERIA, CHARGES FOR CONNECTION TO AND USE OF' DISTRICT 1 S SEWERAGE FACILITIES AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION WHEREAS, these Boards on April 8, 1970, adopted a uniform ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO CONNECTION Al'ID USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES, QUALrrY CRITERIA, REASONABLE USE CRITERIA, CHARGES FOR CONNECTION TO AND USE OF DISTRICT'S SEWERAGE FACILITIES, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION"; and WHEREAS, it is understood that ·the Count7 Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County are contemplating adopting a: similar ordinance; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest that .the charges esta- blished for connection to and use of these Districts' sewerage facili- ties be comparable with those established by the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles.County. NOW, THEREF1 0RE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: (1) That in the event the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County adopt a uniform ordinance establj_shing charges for connection to and use of said Districts' se1·rnrage facilities, the ~,Boards of Directors of these Districts vlill review the said Los Angeles County Districts' ordinance ·with respect to such charges thereby established. Agenda Item 1 7 G-1 All Dtstrlcts (2) That as a result of such revie-v.r_, the Boards of Directors of these Districts determine that there is a substantial difference in the amount of such charges thereby established from those established by these Districts_, these Boards will consider amending the existing ~ uniform ordinance of these District-s in order to maintain_, as much as possible_, a comparability of said charges thereby established with those established by said Los Angeles County Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 8, 1970 Agenda Item 17 All Dlstrlcts RESOLUTION NO. 70-58 EXTENDING PARK LEASE WITH CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY A JOINT RESOLUTION OF .THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING EXTENSION OF PARK LEASE WITH CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Park Lease dated March 13, 1968 between County Sanitation District No. 1, as agent for itself and each of the other Districts and the CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY, leasing certain District-owned real property for public park purposes to the CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY, be extended for the period from April 1, 1970 through March 31, 1971; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secreta,ry of the Board of Directors of County Sanitatioti District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute the documents necessary to extend the Lease. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 8, 1970. Agenda Item 19D -H- RESOLUTION NO. 70-59 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUN'I1Y, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 70-2, AS AMENDED BY RESOLUTION NO. 70-10, ESTABLISHING A NEW POSITION OF EMPLOYMENT AND FIXING THE SALARY THEREFOR The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Section 2, Subsection C, is hereby amended by the addition thereto of the following position of employment: Position ClassifiGation Range No. Salary Assistant to Chief of Industrial Division 41~5 530/659 Section 2. That any other resolutions or motions or portions thereof that conflict herewith are hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and, Section 3. That this resolution become effective April 1, 1970. PASSED .fil\TD ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 8, 1970. Agenda Item 1.9!1_ -I-·All Districts •. B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N Contract For: Date: April 7, 1970 ONE (1) 4-WHEEL DRIVE 4 "JEEP UNIVERSAL" SPECIFICATION NO. A-0 4 BIDDER 1. Brian Chuchua's 4-Wheel Drive Center P. O. Box 301 Fullerton, Calif. AMOUNT $2,775.09 TRADE '67 SCOUT INTN' L $400.00 * * * * * * * * * Specifications were sent to the following firms: Brian Chuchua's, 1625 S. H?rbor, Fullerton Copeland Motors, Boo E. First Street, Santa Ana G. M. Woods, 1710 S. Anaheim, Anaheim Lewis Dean Imports, 1966 Harbor Blvd., Costa Mesa Milne Bros. Jeep Center, 1951 E. Colorado, Pasadena Burgins Jeep, 4001 Cherry, Long Beach Shay's Auto Sales, 13106 E. Whittier, Whittier SALES TAX $118.75 TOTAL BID $2,493.84 The bid received from Brian Chuchua 1 s 4-Wheel Drive Center, P. O. Box 301, Fullerton, California, has been reviewed by myself and the Maintenance Superintendent and compares favorably with past bids for the same type of equipment. I, the1·efore, recommend that the purchase of this vehicle be made from Brian Chuchua. / j/' ,/ // ()-~ ,.-1·~ . I r.(/· /. .. . ·'' .. / ' , /.· ~·· ' (/ ·-{. ·-. -~-<-.. -. :.., (_ t t-• ~ . ( ( (. ____ J. Wayne·· Sylvester Director bf Finance Agenda Item 20 -J-· All Distrtcts J3 I D T A B U L A T I 0 N Contract For: Date: April 7, 1970 ~ ONE (1) 1/2-TON PICKUP THUCK SPECIFICATION NO. A-043 . BIDDER AMOUNT 1. Tommy Ayres Chevrolet $2,323.92 350 Broadway Laguna Beach, Calif. 2. .International Harvester 2,486.38 1110 E. Katella Ave. Anaheim, California 3. Smith Ford Company 12801 Brookhurst Street 2,417.12 Garden Grove, Calif. ~. Worthington Dodge 2,567.20 2888 Harbor Boulevard Costa Mesa, Calif. TRADE 1 65 FORD PICKUP $ 300.00 186.38 25.00 175.00 * * * * * * * * * PLUS 5% SALES TAX $ 116.20 115.00 120.86 128.36 It is recommended that award be made to Tommy Ayres Chevrolet, Torr AL BID $2,140.12 2,415.00 .2,512.98 2,520.56 350 Broadway, Laguna Beach, California, the lowest and best bidder. Agenda Item 20 -K- 17· ·? 1 '/ .. · / ... --~.--:;) / /. . ./ ('· ·/t.:,j'1..:_ b_'-llllf:- .. __.,>J. 'W?-yne /sy,~ve s te r Direitor of Finance All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 70-60 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NO. P2-8-5 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOSO 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SITE IMPROVEMENT8,PHASE IV AT PLANT NOo 2, JOB NOo P2-8-5 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Districts' engineers, for construction of SITE IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE IV, AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-8-5, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m.,. May 8, 1970, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. Section 5. That County Sanitation District No. 1, acting as agent for itself and County Sanitation· Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 'and 11, of Orange County, California, is hereby authorized to award contract for said work. PASSED AND AD8PTED at a regular meeting held April 8, 1970. Agenda Item 21 -L-All Dis t:eic ts RESOLUTION NO. 70-61-1 AWARDING CONTRACrr FOR Pl-15 AND P2-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUN1rY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR DIGESTER SOLIDS DEWATEBING FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1, PHASE III, JOB NO. Pl-15 AND DIGESTER SOLIDS DEWATERING FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2, PHASE II JOB NO. P2-15 TO HOOD CORPORATION The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District Noo 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by John Carollo Engineers, Districts' engineers, and concurred in by the District's Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to HOOD CORPORATION, Contractor, for Digester Solids Dewatering Facilities at Plant No. 1, Phase III, Job No. Pl-15 and Digester Solids Dewatering Facilities at Plant No. 2, Phase II, Job No. P2-15, and the proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That said contract for Job No. Pl-15 and Job No. P2-15 be awarded to HOOD CORPORATION, Contractor, in the total amount of $767,522.00, in accordance with the terms of its bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor; and Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 8, 1970. figenda Item 28 -M-District 1 Engineer's Estimate: $825,000 BID TABULATION S H·E·E T Date March 20, 1970 Contract For: DIGESTER SOLIDS DEWATERING FACILITIES AT PLA:N'r NO. 1 -PHASE III, JOB NO. Pl-15 and DIGESTER SOLIDS DEWA'~I1ERING FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2 -PHASE II, JOB NO. P2-15 ===- = 1. 2. 3. CONTRACTOR Hood Corporation 8201 S. Sorensen Ave., P. O. Box 4368. Whittier, Calif. 90607 J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation 374 W. 40th St., P. O. Box 2476 San Bernardino, Calif. 92406 · United Tectonic & En~ineering Corp. 17210 South Main Gardena, Calif. 90~47 TOTAL BID $ll~9' 522 618,000 l767,522 $131,681 65~ $78'3, 750. $158,905 680~18 l839,S-23 ---------·~----------~~--~--~~~---------~~------ 4. Merco Construction Engineers·, Inc. rrol~ Ruxtort Lane . Redondo Beach, Cctlif. 90278 $ 862, 9o3 ·~-----··-----------·;.._--------~----~~----~------- Weardco Construction Corp. P. O. Box 2h58 . 5. Santa Fe Springs, Calif. 90670 ------·--------· 6. Di versified Builders, Inc.,. a Division of Paramount Warrior, Inc. llt.l.~09 S. Paramount Blvd., $13'1 ,ooo 750,000 $8Wf~obo ----. -11 a"T'1:urrcrco.Tt-,-ca-:1:±:r-. -§'cr/Zs~------------- 7 · Malle raft, Inc. P. O. Box 55010 ___ S~h_e_r1_.·:w.n Oa1s_~~ Calif. 91413 8. ---·------ ~· 10. --·------· Agenda Item 28 -N-Distri.ct 1 RESOLUTION NO. 70-62-3 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR FACILITIES -SEAL BEACH BLVD. INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3,0F ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR FACILITIES -SEAL BEACH BLVD. INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-11 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering, District's Engineers, for construction of WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR FACILITIES -SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD,, CONTRACT NO. 3-11, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m. May 8, 1970, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting neld April 8, 1970. Agenda Item 36 -0-District 3 RESOLUTION NO. 70-63-3 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR FACILITIES -LOS ALAMITOS PUMPING STATION, CONTRACT NO. 3-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. ~ OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR FACILITIES -LOS ALAMITOS PUMPING STATION, CONTRACT NO. 3-12 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering, District's Engineers, for construction of WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR FACILITIES -LOS ALAMITOS PUMPING STATION, CONTRACT NO. 3-12, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant t? the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m. May 8, 1970, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's Engineers be authorized to opert said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. P.ASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 8, 1970. Agenda Item 36 -P-DJ.strict 3 RESOLUTION NO. 70-64-3 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WESTMINSTER AVENUE FORCE MAIN (FIRST UNIT), CONTRACT NO. 3-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3,0F ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WESTMINSTER AVENUE FORCE MAIN (FIRST UNIT), CONTRACT NO. 3-13 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering, District's Engineers, for construction of . WESTMINSTER AVENUE FORCE MAIN (FIRST UNIT), CONTRACT NO. 3-13, ~ are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code· of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m. June 5, 1970, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the Distrl.ct's Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 8, 1970. Agenda Item 36 -Q-District_3 RESOLUTION NO. 70-65-3 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WESTMINSTER AVENUE IN'I 1ERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3,0F ORANGE COUNTY, V CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WESTMINSTER AVENUE INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-14 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering, District's Engineers, for construction of ·WESTMINSTER AVENUE INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-14, are hereby ~ approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State cif California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m. May 22, 1970, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 8, 1970. Agenda Item 36 Dir.tr:i.ct 3 THE IRVINE COMPJ\t'1Y NEWPORT FINANCIAL PLAZA• 550 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE• NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92560 • (714) 644-3011 April 1, 1970 Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District No. 5 10844 Ellis Avenue P. O. Box 5175 ·Fountain Valley, ~alifornia 92708 Re: Bayside Drive -21" Trunk Sewer Facility Dear Mr. Harper: ~he Irvine Company hereby officially requests the Boards investigation of the relocation and sizing of the district's 2.1 11 trunk sewer facility located within existing Bayside Drive. · Th~ r~location is requested in ord~r to provide for a residential marina project called Promontory Bay as shown on the attached sketch (Exhibit "A") . . It is anticipated a new trunk facility could be constructed within the right-of~way shown as relocated Bayside Drive. Upon completion of the· relocated facility the company would seek abandonment of that portion 'of the district's facilities shown within Parcel 1 on the attached Exhibit "B". In answer to your quest~on concerning the proj~ct schedule, we anticipate construction of new B~yside Drive can s~art in October of this year. v~;/7:~-Y-~urs ;__,;/J A/;?tt/,£,( ~{/;,L/ ~vul A. Kayl~?:-· / Director, Si~_)Jeveloprnent . DAK/mc attacbment cc: J. Raus (RAus, Bein~ Frost & Assoc.) S-1 I ,. . • ... ' . ' ' • . ... ... .. . • • • .... .,i ~"'. ·, -• ~·· ~ ~ .. .. .. . ' . ~ ·;-. Agenda Item L16 ----~-····--···-,..~-- S-2 Dlstrlct 5 -4·---~--- .. -.... ~-.--~···-·"-" ·---..-~--.. --.·· -.... --~ ........ - .. ,. S\lt:_T(P. ·ro A(COtv~.PA}-.lY LE.(,.(\L DESC~IPTlO~ ~-c~ ADi\~JC~~t.~T OF A PO~T\ON OF ~t\YSiDE: DR\VE. I B[.i),j(, r:... P02\\0~ ()~-oLL'(K 91~ OF IQ.\flt-.)EC::., Sue.,01\f\S\Okl ,\S S\.-lO\-,\~ Ch\ A V./\P Qt.c.or..o::D \\-:i 2>00'l l, PAG£=_ BB CF •.'.ISCE.LLAllE.()US >-"APS, RE.CORDS Ot=" 02:X~(.,. ~. cou ~-n\" CAL I r-o Q \.l \ (\. . I ?Q,~?t\Q.E 'J ~)y". .· ·-i~:~ ~ ~ £)~~~·: F ;J.O'~ "7 ~1 A SSC(. l~)S ~:·X~![STt'..Z ~.)1·;:i,::_t.\ D/\H: ~-L0-10 c6c.)!:• ~:, e:-.sc .. Cl•'~IF Joe, \JD. 1%. :i2.o1 , ------c·--, .. -,::~~---c-::=--r J-~=-\··~11 c;--C)-~~,=---E-~;·~-~ c-;-;--·----~c~R';.:.;1~~-~==-°"~~: ----·---~~-~==---t ' _) (• . \ I~--/ ~ j j. \ ') {:_ /->, , •. j -·------'--------------·~.-·--····-~-·· ·-·-- p LH3 LI C W 0; { I ( S DE Pf\ RT :v: E/'{f t.Pr n ov ED . .. ···--.. . ...... --·'",'"'("'. .. ,. ... _..... . ., .. -... J S-3 • RESOLUTION NO. 70-66-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM ED3AR Eo PANKEY AND ELIZABETH S. PANKEY RE: TUSTIN EAST APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement, dated March 24, 1970, wherein EDGAR E. PANKEY AND ELIZABETH S. PANKEY grant to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes between Tustin East and Sierra Vista, relative to construction of an off site sewer to serve Tustin East Apartment Development, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, Californiaa PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 8, 1970. Agenda Item 54 -T-District 7 . . . . .. ···: : .: ' ... : :::·:. . : i i ••··· ' \..: .. ·· ... ·• . :.• . . . t··.i =··· . .. ··: •···. : : . . : · .... : .. .. . . •.. : .... J:: .. . .. . . . . ... 13!} .. -r ........_ ___ -