Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1970-03-25Co11llty S;:mite ti o1 1 Di s tric~:; I>. 0 . Box 5i75 r (' c· I c j•f • . o» mrng e oun.y, . .:; :;omia 108144 Elii s Aven ue F ountain Valley, Cai:F, 92708 (1) (2) (3) _( ~) JOlf\fT BOt\RDS Ma r c h 25, 1970 -7 :30 p.m . Pledge of Alle g i a nc e Roll Call Appointments of Chairmen pro tern, i f necessary Re port e>f Lhe "13-0int Ghai:rman ~:--~fi~e~p~o~,r~~+0--;:::07'f:-+t~h::;~@ l Msna0 e1 ..(_6_f--+R;i.,,e,,..,.p-rron1-.· L-,onf-t.b.e Ge n e raJ Couns e J e 19 ALL DISTRICTS -:I5Iscussion o·f proposed Con nection and Use Ordinance . S~e page "A 11 ALL DISTRICTS Discus sion of tentative resolut ion estab1 ishir1 g policy wi th r egard to maintenan c e of comparable c harges beti:reen the Districts and the L os An ge les CCl.rn t:y Sanitation Di st r icts . Se e page "B 11 (9) ALL DISTRICTS L (10 ) Consi deration of the following r es olutions autho:c:Lzing and dir ecting exe cution and fil j_ng o f doc urfle nt s n e ce ssary for a Federal Grant under 33 U.SC 466 et seq .> for Hea.dw orks 11 C11 •• Plant No . 2 , See p age -~~1_1 _ District 1 2 3 5 6 7 J l ALL DI STFnc·r[.; Re s olution No, 7 0 --42-1 70-43-2 70-44-3 70-hS-5 70-~-6-6 70 ·-L ~r(-7 70-48-"ll, -}{~port Oftl~e staff on r e c ent a ctions of r egn1u,t.o:ry J'.J_,L DISTEJCT8 Hepo-:Ct-oJ ·--:Ene Gen e""::i,l Cou.ri seJ o n su.pplemental dis a3t.c r r el:i.cf c..;ml:Lc<:1-L:i on fc.:t Oc f'e.~1 On t fa l.'i No . 2 . (Peter I<:L e~-::i.t Son [-; 1 Co1:1p.:.i.ny ~ Cont rue: tor ) (12) \ (13) ALL DISTRICTS Other busin ess and c om municatio ns (14) A. Consideration of mot io n to receive , fi le and r e fer to the Executive Com mittee , letter from the City of Foun tain Valley , da ted March 18 , 1970 , relative to re newal of the lease of the River Park property by the City of Foun tain Valley fr om the Di str i cts . Se page . 11 E 11 -___/d .,. \ _ DISTR~T 1 -" <fJ:J ~ 7 Conside ration -·o~~~-.wau:iwJa.ts_,~ ,,,.,--~f)a:g-'e ,, D', . ( 15) DISTRIC T 1 _ --- ~sines s and c ommu_n_i ..... c_a_t_,___1 _o _n_s -,~1-.-f'.--a_n_y __ (1 6 ) DIST RICT 1 Considerat io n o f motion to adjourn DISTRICT 2 . Considex ation of -mot i ~FPaft-t~ s~e · page "D" ~ (17) (1 8 ) DIS TRI CT 2 ~ ness and comm (19 ) DI STRICT 2 (20) (21 ) (22 ) (23 ) (2 4 ) (25 ) Con sideration of motion to ad j ou rn DI STRICT 3 1AJ - Cons iderat i on of mo t i on approving Change Ord er No . 1 _!-.!!./;:::- to Contract No . 3 -1 5 (Mill e r -Ho l der Trunk Sewer Manhol e ~ Repair ), a u tho rizing force account work in an amo un t n ot to exceed $L~,OOO , and granting an extension of t im e o f 28 days to Co ok & Barl etta , I nc ., Contractor . See page "F" DISTRICT 3 Ail Considera t ion of motion a u thorizing the General Manager VVf to purchase 100 -feet of 24 " Re inforced Pl astic Mortar Pipe a nd Fittings from Unit e d Technolog y Center in s;_ the total amount of $2 ,110 , plus .tax (r e : Contract No. 3 -1 5 ) DISTRI CT 3 0 .' .r-o Con s i deratio n of ~otio n to ad jour n ~~ DISTRI CT 5 Co n s i deratio n o f mot ion appro ~in g warrants , if See p age "D" d1 any . __ ..1---=-- Y -2- -~- (2 7) (28 ) (29 ) (30 ) DISTRICT 5 Other bus i ness A . Di scuss i on of p oposed I rv ine Company annexation (Harbor View Hi ls , Sector IV ) to the City of Newport Beach , in the Big Canyon Reservoir area . See page "G" DISTRICT 5 Consideration of mot on to adjourn DI STRICT 6 Consideration if any t o adjourn JJ ~ .(° / • (3 1) DISTR I CT 11 Consid(:;~ o ~p'ffge ''D '' a (32 ) DISTRICT 1 1 mun i c t-i~ (33 ) (34 ) (35 ) (36 ) ( (38 ) Other DI STRICT 11 Consideration DISTRICT 7 to adjourn SJ~~/ Consideration of mot·on approving Change Order No. 2 to Contract No . 7 -2AP 2 (Remodeling of Navy Way Pumping Station ), authori zing an addition of $166 .04 to the contract with Kis l ing Construction Company , Contractor . See page "H11 DISTRICT 7 -Consideration of moti n approving Chang e Order No . 3 to Contract No . 7 -2AP-2, authorizing an addition of 63 days to the contra ~t i with Kis l ing Co nstruction Company , Contractor . ~e pag e 11 I 11 DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resol tion No . 70-49 -7, accepting Contract No . 7 -2AP -2 as complete , and authorizing execution and recordatign of a No t ic e of Compl etio n of Work . See page "J 11j DISTRICT 7 ts:t:fl(;;lc.L'.i:l,tion :i_on No . 70-r;D -7, authorizing a-l"lffi:~..e.I'J',11-an Reimburs ement Agreement wi th Irvine Industri V for construction of the McGaw Av e nu e Pum { S Station , o · . o . 7-2D-P , in the total amount $83 ,232 .50 . See page DI STRIC T 7 -COnsideration of Res o lution No . 70-51 -7 , authorizing .1111 acc eptan ce of a Gra of Easement from Bob B . Lloyd ~ and Diane V. Lloyd a a cost o f $150 to the Di strict , ?:! relative to Assessm e t District No . 1 . See page 11L11 -3- (39 ) (40 ) ( 4 1) ,. DISTRICT 7 . . See page 11 D11 5-- DISTRICT 7 Other business and comm~nications A. Consideration of mot i on au t horizing .the General ,/l!l Manager to request a 1 nexation to the 7th Sewer ~ Maintenanc e District of the following proposed <: annexations : (1 ) Da riger , (2 ) Newport , and IJ (3 ) Maude DISTRI CT 7 Consideration of mot i on to adjourn to ~arch 26th , time to be determined by he Board l{l~()Q> f ,fit RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS March 25, 1970 ORDINANCE NOo DHA1"'11 2-2-70 Rev o 2-9-·r-(0 Revo 3-3-70 Rev. 3-10-70 AN OHDINANCE ESTABLISHING RULES AND REGULATIONS RELNf'ING 'l10 CONNEC'l1ION AND USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES, QUALITY CRITERIA, REASONABLE USE CRITERIA, CHARGES FOR CONNECrl1ION TO AND USE OF DISTHICTiS SEWERAGE FACILITIES,· PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NOo The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District Noo , of Orange County, California, does ordain as follows: ARTICLE 1 -PURPOSE The purpose of this ordinan?e is to provide for the maximum public benefit from ~he use of the District's facilities by regulating the quality and quantity of sewage and industrial waste discharged thereto and to provide for charges for the use thereof when such use is disproportionate t6 District costs imposed on other property within the District. The revenues to be derived from the application of this ordinance shall be used to defray the costs of, including the repayment of principal and interest on bonds issued for the acquisiticn, construction or reconstruction and the maintenance of an adequate sewerage system to serve the territory of the District excepting that no revenues derived from this ordinance shall be used for the acquisition or con- struction of new local street sewers or laterals as distinguished from main trunk interceptor and outfall sewers. ARTICLE 2 -DEFINITIONR (a) Assessed Valuation -Shall mean that portion of the total assessed valuation of the property producing and discharging sewage or industrial waste upon which District taxes are levied in the fiscal year beginning in the calendar year in which the discharge takes. place. Property producing and discharging sewage or industrial waste shall include all the real property and improvements in the District used, owned, leaoed, occupied or maintained by·or for the user whether or not sewage or industrial waste is generated by a Agenda Item 7 A-1 All Districts particular improvement and shall include, but not be limited to, offices, landscaped areas, parking lots, warehouses and incidental improvements. It shall also .include unimproved land located in the District when such land is used, owned, leased, occupied or maintained by the user. For property upon which no District tax is levied, the assessed valuation will be considered to be zero. ---- (b) District -Shall mean County Sanitation District Noo , of Orange Countyo (c) General Manager -Shall mean the individual duly designated by the Board of. Directors of the District to administer this ordinance. (d) Industrial Waste -Shall mean the waterborne waste and wastewater from any producing, m~nufacturing, or processing operation of whatever nature, including institutional and commercial operations where water is used fo~ laundering, vehicle cleaning, or the removal of significant quantities of wastes of non-human origin. (e) Local Sewering Agency -Shall mean any public corporation duly authorized under the laws of the State of California to construct and/or maintain public sewerso (f) Excess Capacity -Shall mean the hydraulic use of a District facility for peak flow rate greater than reasonable useo (g) Peak Flow Rate -Shall mean the annually determined highest flow rate of sewage or industrial waste discha!1ged to a public sewer over a period of at least 15 minutes at any time during the preceding 12-month period. In the absence of actual peak flow rate data, peak flow rate may be considered at 1.6 times the greatest . metered eight-hour water use during the preceding 12-month period, provided that where peak flow rate is established for permittees on the effective date of this ordinance, the permittee certifies that said eight-hour water use was for DOrmal operations and not the result of extraordinary circumstancesg -2- (h) Pre-Treatment Facility -Shall mean any works or device ~or the treatment or flow limitation of sewage or industrial waste, prior to discharge into a public sewer. (i) Public Corporation - . Shall mean any City, District, or other public agency duly organized under the laws of the State of California. (j) Reasonable Use -Shall mean the rate of discharge of sewage or industrial waste and the suspended solids contained therein to which a user connected to a public sewer shall be entitled to discharge to said sewer without payment of excess capacity connection charges or use charges by virtue of the assessed valuation of said property and other criteriao For the purpose of computing excess capacity connection charges, reasonable use is hereby established at 25,000 gallons per day peak flow rate_per $100,000 of assessed valuationo For purposes of computing use charges, reasonable use is hereby established at 10 million gallons per year and 15 dry tons of suspended solids per year per $100,000 of assessed valuationo In the event a person producing sewage or industrial waste maintains more than one operation in the District, peak flow rate, annual flow, annual suspended solids and assessed valuation shall be combined for all such operations for the purpose of determining reasonable use and computing excess capacity connection charges and use chargeso (k) Sewage -Shall mean the wastewater derived from human use of buildings for ordinary residential, institutional or commercial purposes. (1) Standard Methods -Shall mean procedures described in the Twelfth edition of "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater" as published by the American Public Health Association, the American Water Works Association and the Water Pollution Control Federation. (m) Suspended Solids -Shall ~ean any insoluble solid matter contained as a component of sewage or industrial waste and capable of separation from the liquid portion of said waste by laboratory filtra- -3- tion, provided, however, no insoluble.solid matter shall be included if permittee can demonstrate that it is non-putrescible and results from planned water conservation or reuse within the premises of permittee. (n) User -Shall mean any person or public corporation discharging sewage or industrial waste to a sewerage facility of the District or to a sewerage facility of a local sewering agency, which facility discharges to a District facilityo ARTICLE 3 -PERMITS (a) When Required -No person or public corporation shall be permitted to connect to, use, or maintain a connection to the sewerage facilities of the District without the permits required and issued as hereinafter provided. No person or public corporation shall be permitted to use or maintain a connection for the discharge of industrial waste to a sewerage facility of a local sewering agency, which facility discharges to a District sewerage facility, without a valid permit issued as hereinafter providedo (b) Condition Precedent -No permit shall be valid unless the real property to be served by use of the permit is included within the boundaries of the District and within the boundaries of a local sewering agency authorized to maintain public sewerage works; provided, however, a permit may be issued for property to be served outside the boundaries of a local sewering agency if a local sewering agency makes application for the issuance of such permit. {c) Information to be Furnished -The District may requlre, in connection with any application for a permit, that the applicant furnish data regarding present and anticipated future flows, quality of discharge and information concerning present and anticipated assessed valuation. (d) Permit for Connection To and Use of District Facility - Application for such permit shall be made to the District and permits shall be issued by the District ln two parts: First, a connection permit for the purpose· of authorizing .connection to a District's sewerage facility under conditions set forth in said permit; and secondly, a use permit for discharging sewage and industrial waste to the District's sewerage facility. (1) A new connection permit is not required for existing connections to District's sewerage facilitieso (2) The connection permit may prescribe requirements as to the type of connection and the use permit may require the provision of pre-treatment facilities necessary to insure compliance with Articles 4 and 5 hereof. Any such requirements shall be set forth in the permit. (e) Industrial Waste Discharge Permit -Application for a permit to use District services and facilities for the treatment and disposal of industrial waste shall be made to the Districto The permit shall be issued by the District and shall be in accordance with the provisions of Articles 4 and 5 hereof. The permit may require the permittee to provide necessary pre-treatment facilities to insure compliance with Articles 4 and 5 hereof. Any such requirement shall be set forth in the industrial waste discharge permito (f) Amendment of Permits Any permit issued under the provisions of this Article 3 may be amended by the District after giving to the permittee a thirty (30) day notice of intention to amend where the permit given was based on incorrect information and the proposed amendment is for the purpose of making the permit conform to the actual factors involved as determined by the General Manager. ARTICLE 4 -QUALITY REQUIREMENTS (a) Substances Prohibited -No person or public corporation shall discharge sewage or industrial waste into a District sewerage facility or into a local sewering agency facility, which facility .._,. discharges to a District facility, when the components of such effluent cause the effluent to exceed the limits set forth herein or are in violation of the rules and regulations of the District estabJished as hereinafter provided. -5- (1) An eight-hour temperature average higher than 140°F (2) More than 100 milllgrams per liter of hexane soluble material (fats and oils) or 25 milllgrams per liter (3) ( 4) of floatable oil both based on an average concentration over an eight-hou~ period A pH of less than 6.o provided that at least 807fa of the time in any eight-hour period, the pH shall be not less than 605 Suspended solids or other substances of such a character or in such concentrations which result in improper functioning of any public sewer through which said solids are conveyed or in the improper operation of the Districts' treatment facilities (5) Any liquid or gas or other substance which, singly or in combination with other substances, could cause an explosive, dangerously radioactive, or toxic condition in the sewerage system of the Districto {b) Rain Water Prohibited -No person or public corporation shall discharge or cause to be discharged to a District sewerage facility or to a local sewering agency facility, which facility dis- charges to a District facility, water from roof drains or other runoff water from rain storms or uncontaminated water not classified as sewage or industrial waste. {c) Additional Rules and Regulations -The _General Manager of the District shall, from time to time as pe deems necessary, prepare additional regulations as to the quality of sewage or industrial waste discharged to the sewerage facilities of the District or to the sewerage facilities of a local sewering agency, which facility dis- charges into a District facilityo Said regulations shall be for the· purpose of insuring that sewage or industrial waste so discharged will not cause undue maintenance in the DistrictYs facilities, interfere w~th proper operation of the treatment_plants, produce a noxious or malodorous gas, create a public nuisance, create hazards to structures, equipment and personnel, or create a violation of the requirements -6- imposed upon the District by Federal, .state or local regulatory agencies. Said regulations shall not be effective until after public hearing and approval by resolution of the Board of Directors. The General Manager shall, thirty days before formal consideration of such resolution, mail a notice of such consideration to each person holding a valid industrial waste discharge permito Such notice shall also be mailed to any person who has filed with the District a request for such notice. ARTICLE 5 -QUANTITY REQUIREMENTS In order to provide for reasonable use of the District's sewerage facilities and in recognition of the fact that the transmission, treat- ment and disposal ·or domestic sewage is the highest and best use of the District's sewerage facilities, the General Manager may set forth, in any industrial waste discharge permit issued, requirements to limit the quantity of industrial waste discharged to a sewerage facility of the District or a local sewering agency when, in the opinion of the General Manager, the existing hydraulic capacity of the District's sewerage facilities would be unreasonably used. Such requirements may limit the quantity of industrial wastes to be discharged with respect to any given unit of time and shall be subject to appeal as provided in Article 12 hereof. ARTICLE 6 -PERMIT FEES AND CHARGES FOR CONNECTION AND USE (a) Connection Permit Fees -No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a permit fee is paid by the applicant, provided, however, that such fee shall not be payable when a permit is issued for the reconnection or alteration of an existing connection made by the District or at the request of the District. Said permit fee shall ·be an amount set forth in a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors. (b) Industrial Waste Discharge Permit Fees and Excess Capacity Connection Charges for Use Greater than Reasonable Use -Except as hereinafter provided, no permit to use a connection to a facility of -7- the District or to a sewerage facility of a local sewering agency, which facility discharges into a District facility, shall, after the effective date of this ordinance, be issued until an industrial waste discharge permit fee is paid by the applicanto An industrial waste discharge permit fee shall be payable in an amount set forth in a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors and shall be based on the volume and characteristics of the industrial waste but in no event shall exceed $250 per year. Industrial waste permit fees shall be payable annually within thirty days after expiration date and upon invoicing by the District. Prior to commencement of use and upon invoicing by the District, an excess capacit:y-connection charge shall be payable by a user when, during the 12-month period after commencement of use, the peak flow rate may be reasonably expected to exceed 25,000 gallons per day unless such peak flow rate is a reasonable use as defined in Article 2 of this ordinance. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, no excess capacity connection charge shall be made for connections in use on the effective date of this ordinance unless there is an increase in peak flow rates of sewage and industrial waste which exceeds, by more than 5,000 gallons per day, the highest peak flow rate previously determined for such user. Subject to the provisions hereinabove, excess capacity connection charges payable shall be computed at the rate of $350 per 1,000 gallons per day of peak flow rate and, in the case of connections in use on the effective date of this ordinance, shall be payable on the lesser of the following amounts: (1) The amount the latest determined peak flow rate exceeds that determined for the 12-month period preceding the effective date of this ordinance or (2) The amount the latest determined peak flow rate exceeds the reasonable peak flow rate determined at the time of the increaseo -8- (c) Use Charges Any person using a connection to a facility of the District or a facility of a local sewering agency, which facility discharges to a District facility, shall be subject to the payment of an annual use charge for the preceding calendar yearo Such use charge shall be payable only on the annual flow of sewage or industrial waste discharged or suspended solids discharged greater than reasonable use as hereinbefore defined. The use charge shall be the actual treatment costs of the District for the fiscal year ending in said calendar year expressed per 1,000 gallons in excess of reasonable .use and $10 per ton of suspended solids in excess of reasonable use. (d) Computation and Invoicing of Use Charges -After January 1 of each calendar year, the General Manager shall determine which users are subject to the payment of use charges and shall invoice the user in accordance with the mit charges established as hereinabove providedo At the option of the General Manager, use charges may be invoiced more frequently than annually when, in his judgment, the use charges are of such a magnitude to warrant more frequent paymento Upon application by any person to the Board of Directors, which application demonstrates a financial hardship, the Board of Directors may allow the payment of excess capacity connection charges to be made over a period of not more than five years with interest at six percent per annum on the unpaid balance. ARTICLE 7 -REFUND OF EXCESS CAPACITY CONNECTION CHARGES Upon application to the Board of D~rectors by any permittee who has paid excess capacity connection charges to the District of more than $5,000, which application certifies that the peak flow rate has permanently decreased by 25 percent or more, and which application is not disputed by the General Ma0ager, the Board of Directors will autho- rize a refund to the applicant. The refund will be computed to maintain the total remaining excess capacity connection charge paid to an amount corresponding to the excess capacity connection charge payable at the time of the decrease. -9- ARTICLE 8 -LOCAL AGENCY EXEMPTION FROM CHARGES No excess capacity connection charges or use charges, as speci- fied in Article 6 hereof, shall be payable for the discharge of sewage or industrial waste from property in the District owned by elementary, high school, and junior college sbhool districts, special districts, the County of Orange, and cities. ARTICLE 9 -MEASUREMENT OF QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF FLOWS (a) Annual Flow -The measurement of annual flow of sewage or industrial waste shall be made by the District by means of a metering device, approved by the General Manager, and installed and maintained at the expense of the permittee, or by estimate arrived at from total water used in the area occupied, or by other means acceptable to the General Manager and to the permittee. The permittee shall have the option of selecting whether the measurement shall be made by meter, or by estimate, or other means, provided that the method of estimate or other means is approved by the General Manager. (b) Peak Flow Rate -The determination of peak flow rate shall be made by means of an effluent meter approved by the General Manager or by field measurements made by the ·District or by the method provided in Article 2 hereof. The permittee shall have the option of selecting the method of determination to be used, provided, however, that in the event the field measurement is selected, an additional charge of $600 per year will be made to defray the costs thereof and will be invoiced each February 1 for the preceding calendar year. {c) Determination of Components -The determination or estimation of suspended solids or other components contained in sewage or industrial waste discharges shall be by one of the following methods: (1) Sampling and analysis by District's personnela (2) Samplir:ig and analysis by personnel of permittee or laboratory acceptable to the District and employed by the permitteee (3) Estimates arrived at by study of operations leading ·to the dlscharge. -10- The permittee shall have the option of selecting which of the foregoing methods will be used, provided, however, that such method must be proposed by permittee and approved by the General Manager before January 1 of any calendar year and continued through- out the year. In the event no method is so selected and approved, Method (1) will be used. Also in the event that either Method (2) or (3) is so selected and approved, the District may, by appropriate sampling and analysis, determine the accuracy of the results obtained. If Method (2) is so selected and approved, the permittee shall pre- pare and submit on, or before, January 15 of any year, a certified statement of the results obtained for the preceding year. All laboratory procedures shall strictly conform to Standard Methodso ARTICLE 10 -INSPECTION The General Manager shall institute a regular industrial waste inspection program in order to determine the quality and quantity of industrial waste discharged to the District's facilities and the effect thereof on the maintenance and operation of said facilitieso Said inspection program shall be carried out by employees of the District and, insofar as possible, shall be funded from industrial waste permit feeso ARTICLE 11 -AGREEMENTS WITH PERMITTEES (a) New Installations -At the option of the General Manager or the permittee, the District will enter into an agreement with any permittee whose assessed valuation and peak flow rate cannot be deter- mined at the time of the issuance of the permit. Such an agreement will provide for an estimate of the assessed valuation for the ensuing fiscal year and the peak flow rate for the ensuing 12-month period, and require payment of excess capacity connection charges on the basis of such estimates and will provide for a method of additional payment or refund, as the case may be, of such cha.rges when actual data as to assessed valuation and peak flow rate can be obtainedu -11- (b) Special Situations -If any permittee feels that the circum- stances involved in his discharge are of a nature which requires special consideration, he may apply to the Board of Directors for a special agreement. Such applica t.ion shall state the facts to warrant such special agreement which may, upon resolution of the Board of Directors, provide terms other than contained in this ordinanceo (c) Existing Agreements -It is recognized that the District may have special agreements for the discharge of sewage or industrial waste to its facilities in effect on the effective date of this ordinance. In such cases, the user shall have the option of maintaining the existing agreement or to terminate it~ In the event of termination, the provisions of .this ordinance will apply to permittee's dischargeo ARTICLE 12 -INTERPRETATION AND APPEAL (a) Request for Ruling -If any permittee or applicant for a permit disputes the interpretation or application of this ordinance, he shall set forth his contentions in writing to the General Managero The General Manager shall, within thirty days, respond in writing to the contentions so made and set forth his determinations thereof. (b) Appeal -If the permittee or applicant for a permit is dissatisfied with the determinations so made by the General Manager, he may within thirty days after mailing of said ruling by the General Manager to said permittee or applicant for a permit, appeal said ruling by giving written notice of the basis of his appeal to the Board of Directors of the Districto Said.written notice shall be accompanied by a non-refundable fee of ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100). The Board of Directors of the District shall, within forty-five days after receipt of said written notice of appeal, make a final determination of the issues presented. ARTICLE 13 -PAYIV'illNT OP CHARGES AND DELINQUENCIES All charges made pursuant to the provisions of this ordinance are due and payable upon receipt of notice thereof. All such charges shall be and become delinquent forty-five days after mailing or -12- delivering notice thereof to the mailing address of the property subject to such charges. All delinquent charges shall be deemed a violation of this ordinance and each day any such charge remains delinquent shall be deemed a separate violation. ARTICLE 14 -PENALTIES Any charge that becomes delinquent shall have added to it a penalty charge equal to ten percent of the charge that became delinquent and thereafter an additional penalty shall accrue on the total charge due, including the ten percent basic penalty at the rate of one-half of one percent per month until paid. ARTICLE 15 -COLLECTION Upon motion by the Board of Directors of the District, any charge and all penalties thereon shall be collected by lawsuit in the name of the District. Any such action for collection may include an application for an injunction to prevent repeated and reoccurring violations of this ordinance. ARTICLE 16 -VIOLATIONS No person or public corporation shall violate any provisions or fail to comply with any of the requirements of this ordinance. Any person or public corporation violating any of the provisions or failing to comply with any of the requirements of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Any person or corporation convicted of a misdemeanor under the provisions of this ordinance shall be punished by a fine of not more than $100,00 or by imprisonment in the County Jail for a period not exceeding thirty days, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each person or public corporation shall be guilty of a separate offense for each and every day during any portion of which any violation of any provision _of this ordinance is committed, continued or permitted by such person or public corporati9n and shall be punishable accordingly. -13- ARTICLE 17 -SEVERABILITY If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held unconstitutional, the remainder of the ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall not be affected thereby. If a provision of this ordinance is held invalid, all valid provisions that are severable from the invalid provision shall remain in effecto ARTICLE 18 -PROCEDURES FOR AMENDMENT Thirty days before any formal consideration of an amendment to this ordinance by the Board of Directors, the General Manager will so notify in writing each city and local sewering agency in the District and each person holding a valid industrial waste discharge permit or who has paid an excess capacity connection chargeo Such notice shall also be mailed to any person who has filed with the District a request for such noticec Such notice shall contain a brief description of the nature of the amendment to be considered. ARTICLE 19 -REPEAL Ordinances Nos., are hereby repealed and all ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent that they are inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance. ARTICLE 20 -EFFECTIVE DATE The effective date of this ordinance is January 1, 19710 -14- TENTATIVE RESOLUTION NO. DECLARATION O~ INTENTION TO MAIN'l'AIN CHARGES FOR CONNECi1ION TO AND USE OF DISTHICTS' SEWERAGE FACILrI1IES COlt'.IPAHABLE WITH THOSE OF THE COUWrY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DIS'l1RICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORt\NGE COUNTY, DECLARING INTENTION TO MAINTAIN COMPAHABLE CHARGES FOR CONNECTION TO AND USE OF' DISTRICTS' SEWERA.GE FACILITIES WITH THOSE OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF LOS ANGELES COUN1rY BY MEANS OF AliENDMEI'fr, IF NECESSARY, TO THE UNIFORM ORDINANCE ESTABLISfilNG RULES AND REGULATIONS REL.C\.TING TO CONNECTION AND USE OF DISTRICT SEWEHAGE FACILITIES, QUALITY CRITERIA, REASONABLE USE CRITERIA, CHARGES FOR CONNECTION TO AND USE Oii' DISTRICT 1 s SEWERAGE FACILI11IES Arm PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOL.A.TION WHEREAS, these Boards on April 8, 1970, adopted a uniform ordinance entitled "AN OHDINANCE ESrrABLISHING RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO CONNECTION AND USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES, QUALI 1rY CRITERIA, REASONABLE USE CRITERIA, CHARGES FOR CONNECTION TO AND USE OF DISTRICT'S SEHERAGE PACILITIES, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION"; and WHEREAS, it is understood that the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County are contemplating adopting· a similar ordinance; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest that ti:e charges esta- blished for connection to and use of these Districts' sevrerage facili- ties·be comparable with those established bY. the County Sanitation . Districts of Los Angeles. County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: (1) That in the event the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County adopt a uniform ordinance establj_shing charges for connection to and use of said Districts' sewera~e facilities, the Boards of Directors of these Districts will review the said Los Angeles County Districts' ordinance ·with respect _to such charges thereby established. :figenda Item 8 B-1 All Dlstricts (2) That as a result of such review, the Boards of Directors of these Districts determine that there is a substantial difference in the amount of such charges thereby established from those established by these Districts, these Boards will consider amending the existing ..._.... uniform ordinance of these Districts in order to maintain, as much as possible, a comparability of said charges thereby established with those established by said Los Angeles County Districts. Agenda Item 8 B -2 All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 70-42-1 FEDERAL GHANT -HEADWORKS "c" RLAN'r NO. 2, JOB NO. r2-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANI'l1ATION DISTRICT NO~-1, 0:£1, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION AND FILING OF DOCUMEN·rs NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C. 466 ET SEQ., IN BEHALF OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTH.ICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER '111-IAT: Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended ( 33 U.S. C. l~66 et seq. ) provides for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 2. Cou.Dty Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for the ...,,,,, purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sevrer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other local collection sewering agencies, and has joined with other County Sani- tation Districts, namely County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, ...,,,,, and 11 in constructing, operating and maintaining joint sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities under an agreement dated October 8, 1959, knoi·m as the Joint Ovmership ~ Operation and Construction Agreement. Section 3. In accordance with the terms of said Joint 01·mership, Operation and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, acts for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, each organized for similar purposes and serving different territories, all in Orange .County, Calj_fornia, for the purpose of constructinr; and operating said joint sewaee treatment plants and disposal facilities. C-1 All Distrlcts ~ Section 4. By means of this resolution a.rid of the resolutions set· forth below by nmfiber, the following County Sani ta ti on Districts of Orange County, California, have authorized the filing of applications for grants under sai~ Act of Congre~s in the respective amounts set forth below and have designated County Sanitation District No. 1 as "Central Agency" for said applications as set forth in Title 23, Chapter 3, Section 2101 (e) of the California Administrative Code: District No. Resolution No. ApElication Amount 1 70-42-1 $ 86,200 2 70-h3-2 251,100 3 70-lt4-3 267,300 5 70-45-5 45,Lwo 6 70-lJ.6-6 47,900 7 '""(0-1~7-7 51,500 11 70-L~8-ll 58,800 Total $ 808,200 Section 5. The General Manager is hereby authorized to prepare, sign and submit for County Sanitation District No. 1, for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, all ~ documents necessary to apply for and accept construction grants under said Act of Congress in the amounts set forth in Section 4 hereof for a joint project generally described as: HEADWORKS "c" -PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-ll Acceptance of said grants may be for amounts more or less than set forth.in Section h hereof. c -2 All Dlstricts DISTRICT NO. 5 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 12896 Shuirman-Simpson, Master Plan 12897 12898 12899 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Bob Bo Lloyd & Diane Vo Lloyd, AD #1 Easement C. Arthur Nisson, AD #8 Right-Of-Way AC.CUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Kisling Construction Coo, 7-2AP-2 -D- $ AMOUNT $ 11,960000 150.00 521.25 671.25 2,378.74 3' 01~9 .99 C I TY OF FOUNTA I N V A LLEY CALIFOl1NIA 92708 CITY H AL L March 18, 19 70 Mr . Fred Harper Or ange Co u n t y Sa nitation Dis tiict 10 856 Ellis Avenue Fo untain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. Harper: ' Th e l ease of th e River Park property from the Sa nitation Di str i ct b y th e City of Fountain Vall ey wi ll expire on March 31. It is the option of both parties to come to a mutual agreement as to the t erms of r enewal . Our City desires to ren ew the lease for a s l ong a p eriod as possible . We r ecommend a minimum of five y ears . En closed is .a map showing the plan for our d evelopment . The only major construction is for a r estroom , which will b e adjacent to .... our property on the north . We will also b e cons tructing fire rings and stands for outdoor seating around our ma j or fir e ring , which will b e on l y of a s em i -permanent nature. Please inform us as to your Board 's d ec ision so we may bring thi s b efore our City Co u nci l at their Apri l 7 meeting . Sincere l y, CIT Y OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY -:3, -,v=--<::~t __ ) \_ A '-~~~-·~-~---::--..: / l I --~ J ----Stanley E. Stafford 1 P arks and 'Recreation Director SES :Ps \ ~ '--... __ J I En closure E--1 A 11 Jn:-~ tr :1 c t :i -·---~-.... ~---------~· .... vVUl'U. l. 01\i'LLJ.lLL J..Vl'>l LJ..L.1::>'J:l\..l.l-Tu u11· U.ttHHLil~ CUUl'H'X P. O. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C .O. NO. 1 -----'------- CONTRACTOR: Cook & Barletta, Inc. ~~~~~~~~~..___~~~--~~~--- DATE: March 25, . 1970 JOB: Miller Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole Repair, Contract No. 3-15 Amount of this change order {ADD) (~E~ll~~) Indeterminate $ at this time ~ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the . contract and/or contract work are hereby authorj_zed and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's letters dated March 3 and March 18, 1970 and Proposal No. 70-860. from United Technology Center The Contractor shall install 24-inch Techite Standard ·sewer Pipe for vent pipe across the siphon at the Wi~tersburg Channel, as directed by the Engineer and as shown on Drawing #J-2T-240C. Techite pipe will be furnished by the District and ~ayment for this work shall be made under Paragraph B-4 of the General Provisions by "Force Account" and shall not· exceed $4,ooo. An extension of time of 28 days is hereby granted the contractor by reason of this extra work. Original completion date: September 28, 1970 October 26, 1970 Completion date with this extension of time (28 days) Board authorization date: March 25, 1970 ~enda Item 20 Original Contr~ct Price $ 79' 742. 00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ none This Change {ADD) (DEDUCT) $ _____ _ Amended Contract Price $ ------- -F- -----~----~----=~ Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chie-f Englncer- COOK & BARLETTA, INC. By Dtstrict 3 .· ' ...... . • .. ·~ .. .. : ·. ·. ·· .. . . , :;·~.; , .. . .. /. ··.·;· I•: ..... : . .... : . ·' ·,, : ..... . . · .. ; .. . . . ...... . . . . . . . · ..... •. . • .. · ... . ;.=·: ·.·: .. • .... : .... I' City Council City of Ne\·;r~:;o~t Be~ch 3300 Ne~·no:ct BonJ_evcu:c1 Ne·wp~JJ:t Ee2ch, Cs..J..ifoY.nic: ----- -• --. ·-.J IH~VIl\JE ·;;. ...... ."> ••• 'l ·;: .... i ~ . . . .. ~ .. : I ~: ~.ki::i:.::·; ·< . .( ·: .··· :)::,;./.-:,::".' ..... ·.··· ····. ··•,· .· .:· ... ;· )• . . ~· ' - ·. !.~ .. .. •. · . :: I \I ( ' .. . . . •·, .. - (' -~ .. , ::,;·::-.;:/.::>·. /: ·.· ... .'.(~ Subject: f...;1nexation of }laj:-bo::c Vi0_-~·1 Hills ·secto;: IV ·. ··· · .,.:._: .. ::n ~: ::•e; ~ t t er J~he Irvine Co1"p ~ n { he;:~ by 1; eon est s th~ t the "~-f;_j'~'.·:·;:·'i:f t'. :/'.! City of Nc~\·ii;ort Beach considej: tne por:ential annexat:ton of ·;·~ the subjec;t property. This letter is intended to se~::ve [:',s · '··: :./.'· .,_ ·· ·s a basis for a s-tu<ly of the considerations involved h-! · .· ·.'°'·<::·~· .. :-.·.-.. :.:~ e.11.ncxi·ng the e:cea to the City of Ne\·1 1Jort Beacho Any f:o;:-,-.12JJ · ·; :: ~;: :=:.: ;_~ .~. ·offc~: to e.-:.lnex \·1ill be coA.1clitioned upon SGt1.sf:~cto:7y p;~~;,s;:~.-:i ··:·_,_·;·· · .. : · >1 ne):ation ~zj~"eements includir,g bt;t not lirciitcd_ to: ·.~:,::~->"·: ·>~:: ..• ;:_; 1.· 2, P.C. zoning The uDes ign Cone<: ts '1 set forth memor c..r:.dw11 e"i1.c los eel hcj~G\·7i th · . :i.n the A legel description ~nd ffi&p ar0 ·the potential anncx~tion ~~;:cao · als~.:i ~~ho enclosed \'lh~_ch )_ncH_c['~~:c nli.l".;G>:~~tio:·"' \·1oul.d be CL";. uninhabite<l annexatio~~ ... ...... ·~ ·. ·, . . • . .. . ·~. :· . , . .:,. : .... .. . . ·,· ~ . . ',• . \ .. •, ' . : · .· .. . . . · ... " . . . '· ... ' ... (, . .. ·:, ·. .... ·;..· .. ·.• ... .. ·: . .. , . . . . . ·. .... . . . ': ·:·:.·· ..... .. .. ' ...... . ···.: ·' •• i . .. •·. d:~ ... ~· :. · ... . . . ,· • . .·. , . .. ' ·. ·, ··· .. " . ... I I~ Agenda Item 26A. G--1 D1strtct 5 .. --·--..... ___ '--------···-- _ ... -• .,,, .......... #' •• ---·~- . : .· . '.· .. ,.· .. : .. .•. . .. . ,• .... . Agenda Item 26A _...., ____ ·-~· .... ·-·----~- . .. • G-2 . ... , ': ., ·: . 1. • ; ·I I t Distrtct I) -., .. _..._. --··r ... -...... ...-., ___ _ .· .. . . .. :· ::>·~.. . :>.·;( .:.:~,·: ... ; ... :.::/··.\.·:.'. ..... · .. ·.:.·i.··'. ... ":·'..·,:;~ .. ~'}·Y:· .. ·::·.'.·.::.·.:·'.·.· .. ) ·._'.;'.,~:~·.·:.:.~.·.·:. :.:J·< .· . .. .i ;{::/:.:.'.' ... ,: ·: :. '· .· <, : .. · · · Desigri Concepts · · · Perre 2 ·:: <: ··" •· .. :: · ·:'.'..,·-::-::.: Upper Harbor Vie;w Hills ... _.. . ~ ..... ·s-:.c··'" --·,4 .. i \T . ·. • ~ v\.J .... ~ .. '1 •• ... I .• ; ':.".:=-........ ,.~ :·: , .... ~ •, • . : ... " . : . ~· ·~ -· .. : :·;.-~ ·.: ... ;::-. ·~:.·· .... \• .. • ~ <:·.··:·~. }·~:.·/>:·:<:/·~"bo ~ A secondary artcrinl higlwmy thi.ough Sector IV from :··~·· Y·~··.~.::.':.: . ..:; ...... ·:~"<:~:..i.:·;.::~:::· t:ew. NncArthur Boulcvm:d to San Joaquin. Hills Road is :! ·:.·.-•.. : .. :.::: <:.<:<::•:_' .. =· ... ·., inchcated on the City's }~aster Plan. Based upon nn ·i·;~-~1::=}·~.-~:.:.~.>.:;.···~:;·'._:./:::~: .. ·..: analysis of the traffic volumes on this artcric-il, it :··· .. :-::•····.·.·· ;-..... · ........ ·appears that the ty:)ical City of Nc·wport Beach cross ... ·'.: .. \·.~·:~:::.~/;,:·~~ ;> .... ·.·.·_.:_•· .. ,:!i.~:· .. · .. ;.·_·_:'.·.:_::·.·· .. ·:.•;;': .. ~.-.•.·:_:_.::·,····'.·.~;-·.: .. _·.::·.~.·.:.· .. :.· .. ::.·.·~·;.·:.·:.'. ... ~.~·-;:. ~;t! :~~ ~ ~~ r~~ s ~ ~~f ~: ~~~~f :~; ~ ~ ~~: !~!~t~~:~ <r~~ l f ~~~ ~: · )~h·?t:.::· ;'. t, . near future, but, it is recognized at present that on° ;·:~·: ..... :: .. ·<··~. -~:~ ·~ .. ,~·:._, .. '..; .. > st1~eet parking wiil ~e unnecessary and that. grades in ... <.·:.~,:·>·~''.=: ... ~/.·~· ·.:-~>=~. · . ·. · excess of 10% are qtnte probable at some pol.nts along :·:(::.· ,.J.· .. ':: . ..·. ·~::.>< ··~~· the prof:Llec The. Capital Irnprov8n1en.t Policy of the .. · .. ·~·;; .:--,.::> ... ·>_-:\ ·.· . .;:.·:.·.::-_:·.-·:·:..:·· City of Nm·1port })each, in existence at the time of ·::.~::::.;·:::·=;::· .... ;.~ :~ :·;..:·:_'.~ .. :.=·!· ·-~:'::(::. const~uction~ should auuly to this arterial highway. ."!~:< ... ::·::. ·; '~· './:.;:.,·/-. ;:/.ir:.~"· San Joaquin Hills Road. ~-s shown as a Major artcdal ·-~ni'.'.Y~/l .~ :·~:_-,. ~ ) .. _..~.:~.·::·>~;.:.:·;.,::··".· highway on the Ncwpm~t Beach Master I)lan c The annex·.. . , '.':".~~ .. ·;:::·;;/ .. ;: ... ~ .:!~.~--:~~··;·/ .. ·;.:~; .. :".~ atim:1 of Sec to~ IV \~1il~ .. ~:?t i.ncluc1e any of the ri~ht·~ ·::·~:L.'r~ .. : ... : ); : ··.::. L .. -.·.: .• : .•.•• -..;·:·.: · ·..:-of··\vay of San Joe.en.an tb.lls Road at the pres en~: time., ,.·· .. :;~·:;.: ···< / · ~· '~::-.:·.~· .. :-::·:~>:·.:; . ._·~·~: ~:·:-_::: It is expected, h~wever, that the 2x2a ·will be included · .. : .. ;··.:: .. :.::::·'.·.~:··.:::···.··.:.::.··.:_·.····:· .. :·.:~··:,:~~·:.: · .: · ·· ::·, ..... :-.· ~.~.-:.: ~:.:· · ·. >. :i.n notential future annexations in the Cons tal Area., : ::.':.'·~>;;· · .. ~·~· ... ·\:_-:::".:~. '.\: At such t:i.me 2..S this a:r.tcrial highway is [!ff1.1exed to thG ·. · · ·/· .. :.-:·:_.;:::(:':·.::~: ..... ·.· · City of Newpoj:t Be&ch~ the Capital Irnpj=ovem2nt Policy :1 ·::.:. -~.-::,-_. ..;J ·.: .. ~·~~"~·~·"·~·.-:~\·:~!" :.~· then curT.ent;; shor~ld be effcctiVGc " .. 3,._:~ ... :.·:,::~-.. ~_·:.~;:.;·; .. ·.~ ....... :._:,':.~,:. . . ~. ~:: "' ~ _; : .:. ~ ' ... \, . : ) ' . ,-. '. • . ~; 1"· ., ~ D ' 1 , ./: 't J • T ~t ' t • th. h. rJ 1 .-:~-.!~: . .".···.· .. !·.··i~C4 0 • esig·'-1 Stanc aras J:Or.' ptlD-l.C .10Ca .. SL:)~ee :s ) .. 11 -J_S :L ._. e~ •. : .• • .•• ·"l .· .~-.: .. -~.··::.-·\:.-~·<.:::·~ .. :-,:, side area will vary from those uttlized in present fle1t"" ·: :,.-: ·./ .·;f -.~ >>.-..-:~:~.~.':,i.:!~··>:<··;. ~.(: land developments in recognition of the rno:ce difficult: -~:.:· :.·.· .·.) ·::::· .·.:.:./:: .. ·~":-": .. :::.::.>:~,. condit:i.ons of the hillside area .. The City of.Newport: ·.: ~ . .-f ":· ::·;:.:>>:.":.:".: ... :··~-:·'..~· .. ·:·.~·;.=:=., Beach;; in recent Council discussions, has indicated the .. ';'-· :·:~ · .. : :··.: .. :. :·.-.·~·.-.::· .... "~.< .. ;.,·· desire to evaluate the needs f:or local streets in hill"" · -~· .. :. .; :.~. ·.':·/: .. j~".:>-.·. ·:;.~:··~:'.:~" side 2.:ccas '2nd has recogi.1:i.zcd. that theJ:e wiJJ. be o.pp1"0·" .. :·~.·;. :_.:;~ . ··.-:.· ...... ·:.· y· .. · .·.~ pr:i.ate differences in desien.C\· Assuming the~t this a·i.:ti.'' ·.: ·>·: :~ .. · .. ·.:>:'.: ... :. · .. ·.·._· tude :Ls rna:~.ntaincc1 ~ it ·s honrc1 be poss :Lbl~ f:o:c The I :-:v::..:::,o . :: :--: ·.·.·. .. .... .. · ··· Compe!;.;.y ~nd the C:i. ty to reach ngreemcnt on tho ) .. oc~~Jrl ·· · .:-.< .:f. >:: ,· .-:.·.: streets :i.n Sector IV of: U.;n;bor .View H.iJJ.p~ :·\~~:.· .. <~ •..... ~-• ).· .. .f .. ··. l}o DR/\INAG~ .. :·;·_'··,. .)i -~· ·· .: · ·· · ~. ·:· ··The Xm1tgomery Master Draincige Plan foj: the City of Ncw·port . .-.· '. -~ :· : · · · . .-.· · .. · · ·})each h2s been reviewed by The Irv:i.~1c Company. The tr:i.butc-!1:y. ·: :·: · ;; '.··· . ·are.as and flow rccruiz·e111cnts as set foi:·~h i'a the report appe.'.1i~ -. -~ .·.>: · .. ··: ... ~· -:-:> ........ ·~ ~ ·· ··= ·anuropric.te .. hm·1cvc:i:. The lrvinc CoiW.1.)nny :Ls l1ot in agreement · ·· · ·. . .. • • --~ • • ._ , ;J J · .~·:-~: .. ; · ,:: ·.:.-.:>:~.:-.·with the rcpo~-:-t 'B [lSSUi.1Qtio~1 that 2.ll d:c::.:i.n::i.gc be hanc1le(1, by --.. ~ · ·· • ·,. · · 1 , , ·c Rr:.c 0 1:i..· ~""Ir!_ .)·"1""'-co·"'"~a··n. c~n,.,.0·1 n.,.,,..,,..,,., •. ..,.,.,,1 : · · · .·: ·•'.. ,· · · .. Ci.1C. OSCO. ClC\7).. '.(!$" · \.v O..;;) ~~ ...... 11.0 l.J ·--l-· . · ;. l-t -1~. '''· ·) ; .. ~ •• \.;. ...... u L~·~.; ,.: • , · ··· .. ·.··· · · b 1 .r: .. _ • -· •• .,., ;,.: .... ~,.. -i·1··-c,·0.··-·o.r: 'i'i'C' ·j·,,,v·i··o Co,·-r1"'"'···y "·o · ·· I. • • • ; ..... :· ~·-c C:.t.. 0.i.)l!J.)~ .• 1.14.:•-l.' (. •. J.\J ..... l. ··~ ,_ . .) .. ••'·"' ... .,. •• !.ti.. .. • •·'.:'""·'·'~ . "· • : · .. :·~·.: .. :· .. ; ·. ~ i . ~ .... I :-, I .'. • . . . . ~ ,: . . . .. . ····· 4"·. ••• •• . . . · .... . . . . ;. ' ~ I '' · .. , . .. . . : . ' ....... ! I Agenda Item ?6A -··---......... _ _.... _______ -n•• ·--- . :,:: •· G-3 . • ~ • • , • I ' • o of 1! I • ., •, ·. . . •' ' ,• ... ''. . · . . ' ., .· ...... ........ -........ ···-·-·'"'~--.._-,,.. ___ ........... ,_ ... ---..-.·.·.-~ ... · .... ~. ' ' ·. ~ . . "' .... ·~ .. :~· . .'·· ~ . : · ... · .. · ~ .· ·:. . ···. .. '• . · '• .. ;. ,, .. ;,· ,. • •• o~ I I : .. G-'-1- ·.· ... . : • . . .· ·• '·,' . ' , .... . . ·' . .. ' ' .. ·, · ..... ··. . :'; . .. . . :- ... .. ·' ; ~ ....... . '.. . :. :.:·'.i:' ;-;:-:,/~ :;;; -~: .".. .... ; ... •, : .. .' ·: ' {,i .: .. :, . :'. • .<· ;., . ~· <<} .· . ~.:. . ... . . ~ . ~ .. ~ .. :~ .~·. ·j~.~ •.. ··j:·:··.·.~.:· •.•• ~' .: •. ~ •. :,~~.:.·.·.·;···~·"':.·~~'.;, •. ~: •.. ·.·.·:.~·~·.: •.. ·: •. ·.:~::.· •. :.· .•. ·.·:;·:.::·\.·:·· ••.• :.::. l! .:·:= ·: '. ··::'. ·:. ·>~~< ... ~) ... ~~~·.::>~.::.·:,::~'.:.::·>~·'.r::: ~OASTAL AREA ~·lAT~B:__SERVICJ~ ·.' · :·" ·., f ' o • • • : '" ,: ... ' ' I • '. ' . . '• :·:\ .', ·.~\.. • o '"''.._ · · .. ~·>.'.~:·: .. :::,<·.!'.: ·'.:.-·::_;-.~:.:~::·,:; J'Uv-J·cn··r·,."··o"'Yt.L·. BOU"''DtiR··~s . . .. ... ..':~··.:.:=;.~'· .. · ~:: '.··· ..• : · .. ~ ........... :' . : •;: :: .. ~ :·: .. : ....... : :; ....... ·~·~ .. !. :.: .• ·.: ·--~'--~}.;_\.) 11 ;,\.,.. .. ~\ .:. .... 1. -·~ i~ . • ... .. • • . . '• • • • i ... :"; ·; ~".: . [ ' . . : " : . .'; .. ) :· ·:,:.:,_ . : : . . ; . ·~ DC c crn b c ~ I~ , 196 9 < ... :~:,::r.~;.;:::~.·t .. :~ .1 .... : .· .· ·. . . ~ ·:-.;'.· ". ~;"~.'.': ~·· = ... ~ .. > .. ' • ~ • ·o'.: 'i' :··:~!' ~-,'.~·r:'.''::.~< ·.; '. · .... ·. .. In rece-;.1t yea:cs) several stt.:dies have been pc~formed to deter-::.:.:~·~ r·~.~·:;.,:_·:"L:::;: :::· .... ·.. mine the logical r:~eans of providing water s crvice to the Irvine ...... :.; . ._.~~·J. \'~:<:". . ... · Coastal Ar:eci.. The earliest s~ucly was that of James X. .::.>;;.-;·;:··:::-.~.<-.. .'; ,>:~~. Nontgol.1ery as perfor111ed for the City of Newport Beach. This >:· ... .-.~.\~'.~·.:·-:::: ·:/'.·.~·.'~.:·.~·~··.· initial sti..:dy was utilized 2.S a basis for the establishment: of: :·-~ ... · :.::::.:;· ... -.~ .,: .... :· the Nc\~.rport 3each Zone III Water Ordi.nangc. Subsequent studies··.!.;·:··~·:.:-·~? .. ~· .. : ::"-:!·;. .. have be0i1 pJ...·f~i)ared by the Irvine Ranch Wc:-~ter District and The .:···:~;:"·;·_;··;~:> i·= >~:·.'.~':;·Irvine Comµ2ny. Prelir1linary results of The Irvine Comi)ciay's :·:";~:;~·(.<·! ... ·.:~:. :!:· ·: : .. '.'.:, .. s tuC:y ·were noted in a letter to the City of Newport Beach dated" . ·: · ··;·:.~:·~~·>::·:~ ; • •'· • • • ':\T " l ') 19 I' 8 .(: ' • ' • ,,_ J.-. h 1 J • l 1 . -"-• =.'·"-:·:;;·" l\OVcmoc:;: _,, o , a copy o.i: wnicn i.s al. L.aci.. ec > w .. 11.c 1 concern co · ..... · .. · ·.·:····-·. ' ••• : •• :.•. ~ t.,, 0 t .! • ~ -.-: ,_ h :':'I ~·· ·-~ t -·...,.. -1 z ... v -t,. ~-. ""' . ..!: .! l . t ,..., ,_ .. _:· .. ; ~·:·.: ·:.:·::.:·. t.L1e .J.J.1..._r;g O,,_ ~ 1.:,; £Ode "".L;.. ad.G one J •. pump S ~lL.1.0u ;..aCJ •. J •. y ciL. . • ·!· .:.~:.:... · It•• '• ' ·e ....... e c "."°) 0 .. " ;!.:-~:,. .. blg anyon KGservoir. .:··::,.::·-.~:'.:--:'.·:·: :}: /"°'-The recently completed Ir.vine Master Phm Study· for Water Scrvice··:;:·::rf.;\:·~r:'. . :· ;·_:.... to the Irvine Coastal Hilis, &n aT.ea of so:ne 20, 000 acres, was · .. ·::·.:· .. '. "/: ·: ~.· ~>._..':.':. intended to evaluate 5.n techni.cal ter;ns the alternative syst:e!l1 . ~: ... ~~ ·::'"4 :·:·~ .. : 1 _ ... :._·.;_ ....... 'Rvhi.c~ T~ould s~rve. the s~udy area tBmc1e~1J-: the aus~ices oD~ th~ Ir.vil~e_-,:._:'.:::·.-·:~:··:.:·:·.r ... ·• &nc11 \\ate}: lhs~r1.ct, tu.e LRr;una ..... eac 1 County \ ... at:cr J..st~CJ_ct ci.i.1Ci .... :<7~.1 ·~.::.::::.·. :.' :~ · · the City of: Newpo):t Bea.ch. : .. :/=:\:~: .:..:.;. ~/ ·: i.;J-'.: The rcsul ts of the. s tucly indicate s ign:lf:Lcan~ benefit to the '··.: :;f,;:::r:··i·!>:· .:'.:°;.-.. ghenc 1i~al.pub~ic ~m\~m: a JD·~1ris~1ictiona~ ar:cang~ment esta1f)lis~hing: .· :.·_:.i.·.~ •. ~· .. ::.:.~_·.~· •. ;~.'~ .. :· : : :. ... t c rv:i.;:le l\anc11 '-'a te1.. J.s tr:i.c t as tne wa tei:. purveyor :or ·..._ e "~~~ ... ""'":.:"portion of the Irv:i.ne Coastal Area essentially bounded by the ·: ... :·,:·;::·.~.·.: .. · >::·.·"·::.: .. : .. prcs8nt City of Newport Beach and. the Laguna Beach County Water . ·.· ......... ~·i=.' ~<:~./:~:: .. District. Ori this basis, the Sector IV area of Harbor V-J.ew Hills·'.'·.'.'··<··· ... ~ ·?: ... :'.:·\::~-... :~"should Tl!ce:i.ve wateX' serviee from the I:cvine Ranch Hate): District:c .. ~.:-.. :-:.:-··:: \.~::;·.:>t·Y.' . . ,.,. . .\ .. :;:\ .< .. · .. ."< ;·.·-.~::-:·.:~. ~. Recc:1t stuches· by the Irvine Ranch Water D:i.st:rict have led that .:.· .. ·.··.'.· .. • .. , ,. • I • . • b 1 • l t • . ,._-~.~·;.·.:-~·'..::.agency s Board of D1.recto}:s to take actl.on y w n.c 1 tt1j.S agency ·.:.::.:.::::.· :::·-..·; ·:.·~;.;:~:::'~·~=~: has ?roposec! to serve I:-:-v:i.ne lnnds in the Coastal· Area as noted ... · · , . ,. ~·:~:'/~:~:·!: above. It is the intention of The IrvinQ' Company to nccept the .=·.,:·~. ··.' .... ?~'.:.::~\::: .. Irvine Rau.ch wa te~ Di.s t:cic t Is proposal ·while. ~ecogniz i.n[; tba t t[L~.8. ::·· .. · .. : ':: :~;:~: .. :~:;-:,:· .. _.c-i.cccpt.'=l~-ice cat.:scs a potent:i.nl overlno of: the p-:coposcd City of . · ::·."·:;·'.;··. ··: :.· .:··:=.· ~··· .. : T ,.. .... ~.. -l .• "-1-1-~ \• -• A-h ,,,_,~ ... :,,.,.. .! •-" • ·T.:, r.•• ',.., "l"' ·"'-Ji•n D·• ··-· .... -! "-:• : • ~. :·· • • .:i~·:: .:.:·:~· .. Ncwpv~.l~ Beac1 CJ_l-y ..1.1.1;..t:,o 'W.1.\~.L1. ~1 .. C , . .l..~.V.1 ••• 1.-3.·.&.\.<...i..J.Cii._._\'.v.1.-~1 •.. LSt.JJ .... c"' .. ";./· .. _ .. • • .• . : _.: '~ ·f"".j C' <~ ·' c .._ -~ o·-. '": ! \.. o· .. ~--.,.., ":) ·l"""'·i '1 C' •. : ............ ~. ,.: . ~·· ... ~:.;':\.,·: . .: ~ .• :-· ··.:'-:· .·. ,·: ··' .• •. ,, .·:r .. , _ , ~· .. · ,~ ~· . :· . • ..... :: ... ·., =·· • I '' .)\...\J...J .. \,.I \~• 1\.-..._.... !.t.\..-~r.J lJ lit.t.l!\niJ.i•"'ol~-\Jf,i :'·.·· •,,, ,,,/, , ... ···. · .. · ·." •. , •. '.• •·' .. '·•• , •··.,1'••' Jt •t . •' . ., ., . . . . I• ·· .. , G-~5 ... I• ...... .. ·' ....... . .. z llt't . . . . . • ~. I .: : • •:1 ... , , . . ::,~ :, .. •. .c: ... . ; ~· .;:; .-·~·The ttajo::: reaso:ls behind 7he I:-vine Co~p~L1Y' s decision in thi.s ·:··, ="" .. tn~~tQ~ a:;e. ~~c..s~d upo~1 the zcvai:lt<.g~s to the future ho~.em·mcr o:: / .. : .. --·· tn .. s -l, ..... l.C'(')""-"l-~"\"'l ,..•A•,-..-or~e;:'J--.et"',._ r1•i..{'"'}, ~.! .,.. , t ·~~·· -J.. j d .• .._, 1 .\..-L.. .... LJ.10.. Cd .. .i..~-;,u_ ci .. u\1 1 .._1.1v ;;lc .. J 0-.. c\0\T[\n ·ages Cl.t°~ ClS ·~.· :· ... r-01·; OT 15. v . .. I ... ~ •.• ~· J.... 4 .... • • •I: : : ;., I • . • i • • •• '· •• ~· .. 1.; ·The most ecor.0~:1ic<.l :-.12ste~ pl.:m level backbone wntc~: cl-J..st~:-~4 ... ··:-1• ·:.:= ··!· buti.on sys~e;n w1 .. ll be ~:r.ovided ·within e2.ch·juL"i.sdi.ct1.onal ···:·: ~:: ·::: agency's C>ouadari.cs. • . . • · . ·x~;~'.: .:.: .. 2c;.". The plc!nned juriscl:Lctional boundary· adjustments w:tll res\.~lt'>/;.'::' ~.·.·· .. ··in th2 le2st cost to the total service a:rea. · : .?,·~.:=;~~.'.~ :·:, ... ~~. . . ....... . •\·~. . . . . , ·.·.~~.3 •... :. Operation ar.d ma:i..ntcn&nce of a backbone system of. \·iD.teT •.·. ··.~·-~ :.>:·: : ~; •. service for the Irvine Coastal Area by a s :i.nr;lc 2 .. eency wi.ll . I ••• • • 1 .C ,..f • • 1 1 l ·~~· ·!':: >:~··. prov:i..ce ~.or gr.eater eJ: ·J.c:i...ency anc tnc east cost. l:·· • • • 1.• •• , ... .. . ::~~~·''~:~~:the i.ntenti.on of the Irvine Ranch WateL" 'Dist1~j~ct to f.i.nancc ;~.'. . ·: . . . " . t ' b , l ' r: • 1.1. t . #-' ' 'L. , ·~-~· .. ·~·.: oe necessc..ry ac.tZl)One ·water syscc;n ;...2.Cl. ;..·1.cs '--n.~ougn a uO'i~u...:· .. ~::!.~;·:.-:·:!.: :· isst1e r-c:. the~:-thc.n the current appro~ch in the City of New~)O~l:· .·:· ... :;: .... ·.· .· B , . r: ~ t . J • ~ ~ r -r ... --:i. -· .D , ....... c l ~ .,,,. - -'-· , ~ ~ d ~. J . . .... ·-. , •• r:.' .. ·. eacn O;... L l •• J.%.1-.DL .... 1,,::J..Jll L...i • .:.iemen\.-ag •. ~e.t1en1...s 'WJ..L. .. 1. .ev~ .O?C; ............ :. ;~ ... ; ,.'~ f-.. .• ) i -~ .• 1 ~ ,.... c ~ r • f: • ' ..., ,.. ,.. .• . • • '.,. .... J J ,... t t· t' 'J • • ·• ~:::.·;_, •. · W.;... .;. pJ..OVi.C~c c-.. u.i.gn1..1..J.CcXn .. SnV.Lngs 1 .. L1 OV8J.c.t •• COt>, .O nt:: ··.,· · ... ·. ••\ ···'· h ' •. .. . ~'-i; ~~·:·~·= ome0wn2r. .. , .,, . ,~ ,' • ~.l: I • •• · · •• • •. • ·• t I ·, ·.. . .;,.·:. ·.··:.5.:·~~·: At the present: time> a major portion· 0£ the Tr~ine Coast2 .. l < ·_-~-'·:·! .... A i · . h" h . . ... . R ' t 7 D. . · • ··:'.'·":_. rea :tcs Wl.t 1.n tL e existu1r! J.rvinc ancn \·.ater .. i.stri.ct : . . ·.! ::<~: .. ~ juriscii .. ct1.ona1 bouncLs.ry. This cn:c~c-~ is oblieated tq the ~ ,. •• .• •t • • .. • b 1 1 • d b .. ' .r= ' •• • R , T 7 D . • "" r. ,: .. ·.:::-ex1~s Ll.ng onc.e_c1 in e. Lccne.ss 0.1~ tne J..rvine C"d1cn .,. at er J.st~c,~c~; ~:~~.:·~·~:·.·.for the San Joaqu·in Reservoii project. Unless the 0re0 is ··.-~·::··;. ,,;·,. ··.=:~ rnai.ntai.ned within the lrv'inc Ranch Water District, the rcsi~·,_.:.:~;. -~·:·.' .:.:::.· dents. of: the aJ.ea ·would be subject to d9ublc:! taxation. ··:. :·,· • ·: • .•. • •, • •. I : ... ~ ·~·6/'·. Responsibility for service to the Irvine Cbastal Ar'ctt by a t~~··,·. ·. ·. r:. s:Lnr~le c:gency w:Lll allow for logical phasing of nccessnry ·-'::'(; ;:.~~:·:·::·.:·~~.facilities and .the~:-eby minir11ize cash flow needs ·J .. n co:npari.son··.~·.!:·:·: ,r. •• • • h ~ ~ t t ' b " ' , . . . 1::.-. .··.··: w:;_t at:~(~;:1pl.s ·o open up :ne. a:cea y cnree. scparace agcnc:i.es. ··· .. :·: I • • •' d h J t.. • I 1 r.1 • t,.. 0 h ] d • '• ' • o• • • . ~:;r··· ... an t:l c resu .tClnt 1.11.gn cc:.sn ;: ow re.~u:;.1-:ei~1ents 'duJ .. Cl wou.. oc ;: .... :···~ "• ".· 0 • • • , th .. i ' •' I;,:: ~'::\.· · ll11pos 20 upon -c :ces l.c1en l:s . ~ ..• '·" :." I • .-•&.a' ! •. :·: . • . •• ,. ~' ~~~Based upol! the. above logfc > 1.t 1_s irnport::ant to cs ta bl i.sh rccogrd ..... · ;:·:.=1 . ;!~ tton at this time of the future jurisc1icti.onal .bounda:ci.cs for .. ·".-:. \;.\vater service !:o the I-;~vi.:1c Coastal Arc.c:. with p.:1}~ticul<n: crnphc-.s ~-s ,.: • ~ Oi.1 the es ta bl ishil1ei1 t of the I:rvi.nc Ranch Wa tcj: Dis U:i.c t ns the /.wc:i.ter purvcyo~:-\·lit:hin Sector IV "of lI8j:hm:-View ED.ls, Fu):thei:, r .. ~·these coi1clusions· will alJ..ow t1-:e. City 0£ Ke\·:poi:t Ec<:ch to 1.ogi.cr.} . .!.y ;,<' :• • ") ... ,..· ~' r r.:.1-•.• •r•"'l·~.-,r• "'"'\ n·11 ---r·~'·.-.)· r...~.···ci·"c\)"'·l··,,.c·· .,./":;'ll1·~· ... -:-.··1')·~·'-:•". • .... ··: Cl11c, .yz,0 LCl...;! .t..lll-ltJ.Q. C;\.~.11.:..u,::_:~O·~ c~• c c ... ··~<·"~·O:• :· :-::;:.:.) -l~. :~: .l': ~ ),\.~·\ ...... J •• ~.il vUl..v· :: .•. G-6 G-7 Djstrict 5 -...:._:_L -· -.. _. ____ .. -- vVUHTl uJUU.Tl\TLU1'1 lJL~'l'!U.C'l';:) Ul1' UKA!'Wt; CUUNTY P. 0. BOX 5175 -l08li4 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. ---=2 ____ _ CONTRACTOR : __ K_i_s_l_i_n~g'--C_o_n_s_t_r_u_c_;t_i_o_n__;;C....;o.-..m ..... p_::.a.;_n...,My __ _ DATE: March 25, 1970 JOB: Remodel Navy Way PUJnp Station, Phase I, Contract No. 7-2AP-2 Amount of this change order (ADD) (DED11ET) $ 166.04 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the ~contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractorrs letter dated March 17, 1970 and Contractor's invoice dated March 17, 1970. ADD - The contractor shall furnish a reinforced concrete top for the ·wet well with two 36-inch diameter accesses in lieu o~ the single access top as shmm on the plans. The contractor shall furnish one additional 36-inch cast iron ring and cover for this wet well top at a cost of • . . . • • • ·TOTAL ADD •• Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Change~ ADD Amended Contract Price • $166. Ol~ . .i!._66. 04 $ 12' 385 :__Q-2___ $~_,744.50 $ __ ~66._._04_1 __ $ 14,295.54 --·----··--== -':.--~---~-~-==----==~==-=-~::::::::....-= Board authorization date: Approved: ~· March 25, 1970 -H- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, Californ:i.a By ___ _Ls/___Pa~:.L.G. Jl:r.<2wn _________ _ Chlcf Engineer KISLING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY By __ . ___ _ District 7 COUN'J.'Y ::.~l\HI'l'f\TION DISTH1Crl1f3 ·OF ORANGE COUNTY > "'I c:.-·1 ··r r· -1 () 0 J I 1 I· , 1 ·1 ' I • 0 • BOX -_; _) _ u · E. _ .. l s Av c nu e • Fountain Vnl1ey, Cal.ifornia 9270B CHANGE ORDi·:H --~---------.. ·---C •. 0. _NO. __ 3 __________ ._ CON'TH.l\C'l'OH: JOB: ReIQod~J Navy Wa_L_R_~.BlQ___§_tR tion, Ph_ase _l_, Contract No. 7-2AP-2 Amount of this change order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ ___ ..:-__9_::__._ ,._,.,. In accordance with contract provisions, the·followinG changes in the contract and/or con-ci'act work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the followine additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. · REFERENCES: Contractor's letters dated January 10, 1970 and March 17, 1970. EXTENSION OF TIME: The contractor is hereby granted a time extension of 63 calendar days due to the following events: (a) Extra work as stated in C.O. No. 1 14 calendar days (b) Redesign of wet well due to problems encountered that facilitated C.O. No.· 1 7 calendar days 14 calendar days (c) Rain, fog and inclement weather (d) Delays caused by County Sanitation Dis- tricts' personnel in installing bypass ~umps and dismantling equipment in ex- isting pump station 28 calendar days ~SUMMARY: Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date Actual Completion Date Board authorization date: March 25, 1970 Agenda Item 35 TOTAL • . . . • 63 calendar days N.ovember 29, 1969 45 calendar days January 13, 1970 108 calendar days March 17, 1970 March 17, 1970 · Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes (ADD) Thls Change (U'~l(m!'i!~ Amended Contract Price Approved: $ __ _12 0 85-J2Q __ $_L-2.l~_4 _ $ ____ :. 0 _--- $ _ 14 ' ?9 5.~!±__ __ _ COUHTY Sf\Nl'J1/~~~ION IHSTHICTS of Orvnfy~ County, Calj_fol'nia KISLING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY -I-District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 70-49-7 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-2AP-2 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-2AP-2 AS COMPLETE The Board of Directors of County Sanitation Distric·t No. 7, of Orange County, Calif~ ... 'nia, DOES HEREBY RESOINE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Kisling Construction Co., has completed the construction in accordance ·with the terms of the contract for the Remodeling of Navy Way Pumping Station -Phase I, Contract No. 7-2AP-2, on the March 17, 1970; and, Section 2. That by letter, Boyle Engineering, District's engineers, have recorru11ended acceptance·of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said· engineers' recommendation, \·;rhich said recom-· mendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the Remodeling of Navy Way Pump:i.ng Station - Phase I, Contract No. 7-2AP-2, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 28th day of November, 1969; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held March 25, 1970 . .Ar;enda Item ::36 -J-Distr:tcl 7 RESOLUTION NO. 70-51-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM BOB B. LLOYD AND DIANE V. LLOYD The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement, dated , wherein BOB B. LLOYD AND DIANE V. LLOYD --------- grant to County Sanitation District No. 7, a permanent easement for sewer purposes relative to Assessment District No. 1, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That authorization for payment in the amount of $150 to BOBB. LLOYD AND DIANE V. LLOYD, 11571 Forum Way, Santa Ana, California, is hereby granted; and Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to re~ord said deed in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held March 25, 1970. Agenda Item 38. -L-District 7 816 NORTH ROSS STREET SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 9270i (714) 835-3355 JOHN H. SAWYER. GENERAL MANAGER March 19, 1970 Orange County Sanitation Districts Board of Directors c/o Secretary, Mr. Fred Harper P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California Gentlemen: I, Andre Babineau, and my representative John E. O'Malley, of the Orange County Employees Association, request a meeting with your committee as provided in paragraph 6 of the new Grievance Procedure. The reason for my request is that I have been unjustly denied my merit increase and my rights to a hearing. It has been stated by some that the time limits for filing a grievance have expired.· Unfortunately, that statement is unacceptable because the nature of the present injustice is such that for each working day injustice remains unresolved, the grievance renews itself. For example, if a man works overtime and is not compensated in some way, his failure to file a grievance within the speci- fied time limits dissolves the issue, until the next time the incident occurs. In my case, the unjust denial is not an iso- lated incident in time, but a continuing injustice renewed each working day. Therefore, I request a hearing before your honorable board as provided in the Grievance Procedure. Sincerely, (.· 1 ,, ~ ., (2 /(L,~l~"._/ .' /:_.-'?~r.ltv~/:21, .. · / . AndrevJ. Babineau AB:ar cc: John E.O'Malley . . ·--·------~-----------·-... ---·----------------·-·---·-·--~-------·-· .. ··-····· .. -··~····-,-----~---.. ····-·--·---··--'. ·--·-----···--·-···-.. --. ._._.,._. ________ ----- II MANJ\Gh::R'S AG~-~~A rm ~orrr County S:mita iion Di shids P. 0 . Box 5175 10844 Ell is Av enue Fou ntain Vul ley, Cnl iF., 92708 T elephon cs: of Oran ge Co unt y, (.,liforni a JO H~T BOARDS ADJOUR NED MEETING Wedn esday, Ma rch 25, 1970 7:30 p.m. Arco Code 714 5 40-2910 962-21+1 I March 20, 1970 The basic r eason for thi s ad j ourned meeting of all the Boards i s to discu s s the proposed uniform sewer con .. l'lection and use ordina nce which was presented to the Boards at the March 11 meeting . However , additional items of business h a ve b een included in the agenda bec ause of their urgency. The following is a brief expla n a tion of the more i mportant non- routine items which app ear on the enclosed agen da and which are not otherwise self-exp l a...Ylat o:r.y. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Joint Boa rds Nos. 7 and 8 -PROPOSED UNI FORM CO NNE CTIO N AND USE ORDINANCE: As stated , the reason for this meeting is for the Directors to become thoroug hly f am iliar with the prov isions of the proposed ordina nce . A copy is enclosed in the agenda material and i n order to assist the Bo ard members we are er.closing two additional reports as follows : ( l) A t wo-page summa ry of the ordinance. (This s ur.rona ry, together with the ordinance, h as previous l y been tra n s mi tt ed to all citi es a nd s ewe ring agencies withj_n the Districts for the ir study.) (2) A rep o1~t on the backg round and theory of the charges and fees established by the p ropose d ordinance . Also enclos ed is a t entative resolution establishing policy with r egard t o maintena nce of compar ab l e charges between -our Distri c ts and the Los Angeles County Sanitation District s . During the cours e of our n eg otiations with the Ad Hoc Committe e of the Orange County Chamber of Co m.me rc e , I ag r e e d that our staff would submit such a resolution to the Bo a rds for cons idera tion . No •. 9 -ADDITIONAL APPLICATION FOR FEDERA L GRANT ON PLANT CONSTRUC'I'ICN: As stat ed at the March 11 Board meeting, .I am recommending that the District s apply for a grant on a construction project a lready com- pleted, Headworks 11 C 11 -Plant No. 2 ($2 .5 million project). In view of the greatly increased Federal Water Pollution Control appropriations, it ap~ears that there i s a possibility that the Districts can obtain, on a 'reimbursable basis", funds for this proj ect . No. 11 -REPORT OF GENERAL COU NSE L ON SUPPLEMENTAL DISASTER RELIEF APPLICATION FOR OCEAN OUTFALL NO . 2 : The Directors will recci.11 tha t at the March 11 me eting a l etter was received from Peter Kiewit Sons' Company requesting that the Districts app ly in their behalf for greatly increased Federal financial ass istanc e to compensate for d amages to them resulting from the excess ive amounts of river mud d eposited in the outfall construction area as a result of th e 1969 floods. Th e matter was referred by the Boards to the Gen eral Counsel fo r study and report. Dis trict No:...J. Nos . 20 and 21 -CHA NGE ORDER FOR CONTRACT NO . 3 -15 AND AUTHORITY TO PURCHASE PIPE: This contract with Cook & Barletta, Inc., is for r epair of manholes in the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewe r . which have incurred serious damage in the past ten years from sulfide attacl~. When this job was planned, it was intended to include in it a badly ne eded sewer gas vent across a siphon under the Wintersburg Flood Contro l Channel in order to prevent the upstream .escape of malodorous sewer gases which have been the cause of a number of comp l aints . How ever, since it ·was determined tha t the most economica l method of constructing this vent would be to place it on the Southern Pacific bridge ad jac ent to our sew er , an agreement had to be reached with the railroad company . Since thi s agreement took considerab le time to c onsummate, the contrac~ as bid, did not include installation of the gas vent . In order to proceed with this construction, we h ave asked the contractor to install the pipe and fittings, to be purchased by the Districts (Item No . 21), under the fo rce account provisions of his contract. This matter is of constderable urgency s i nce the con- tractor is now working in the area of the gas vent and his charges for the extra work will hence be consid e r ab ly l ess than if the change order is d e l ayed . Di strict No . 7 Nos. 31, 32 and 33 -CO MP LETION OF CON 'rRA CT NO . 7-2AP-2: This sm a ll contract for the r emode ling of the existing Na vy Way Pumping Station wet well h as now been completed and it is recormnend ed that the work be now accepted in order to expedite final pa.ym ent. During the course of the work, the Distr1ct 1 s Mainternrnce Departme nt requested an additiona l manho l e access to the wet we ll. Th e contractor h as sub- mitted a.ri invoice for $166. 04 for thi s extra vmrk and we therefore -2- rec omme nd Ch ange Order No . 2 to provide this extra sum (It em No . 31). Also recommended i s an extension of time to the contract for the reasons listed in Cha nge Order No. 3 (Item No . 32). It em No . 33 is the customary resolution accepting the job as complete on March 17 , 1970, and authorizing f i ling of Noti ce of Completion . No . 34 -REiiY'ffiURS EMENT AGREEIV!ENT WITH IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX FOR McGAW AVENUE PUMP STATION: This master plan pump station is now c omplete and in operation a nd since it was con s truct ed with funds provided by the Irvine Industria l Co mplex, it is r ecomme nded tha t a standard reimbursement agreement b e entered into for the sum of $83,232 .50 . No. 38 -ADJOUR NMENT TO CONFIRM THE BOND ELECTION RESULTS : It will be nec essary for the Board to adjourn to a time and place to confi rm the r esults of Tuesday !s election . Subject t o the approval of our Legal Counsel, i t is suggested that the Board adjourn to 5:00 p .m., March 31, wh ich is the date of the next Executive Commi ttee meeting . Fred A. Ha rp er Gen eral Ma::i.ager COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANG E COUNTY, CALI FO RNIA SUMMARY OF PROPOSED SEWER CONNECTION AND USE ORDINANCE (Refer to 3-10-70 draft of Ordinance) Article l -Purpose. To establish effective control by District over quality and quantity of sewage and industrial wastes reaching District facilities and to establish charges wh e re a user contributes more flow than his asse s sed valua tion justifies (more than "Re asonab le Use" -see below). Ordinance is applicab le to all users of District's facilities, whether or not directly connected there to (except for connection permi ts - see Article 3). Article 2 -Definitions . The only definitions p e rha~s not entirely self- explanatory are 11 Peak Flow Rate" and "R easonab l e Use'. Peak Flow Rate is theoretically the highest flow rate sustaine d for 15 minutes during any year . In the absence of a r ecording e ffluent flow meter, it is recogniz ed that it i s difficult or impractica l to d etermine this value. In such c ases, a_n estimating procedure is provided. As an example , if it wer e de termined that ·a user h a d a highest eight- hour water u se of 80,000 gallons, his p eak flow r ate would be estimated at 10,000 x 1.6 gallons per hour or 10,000 x 1.6 x 24 gallons per day (384,000 gpd). Peak flow r a te is the governing f a ctor in the amount of the Di strict 's capital outlay . He nce this term is r e l ated in the ordi- nanc e to a one -time c apacity cha r g e ("Exc ess Capacity Conn e cti on Charge "). Re asonab l e Use -The i ntent o f this c on cept is to e x emp t all tax paying us ers from excess capacity and u se charges except those whose taxes paid to t h e District a r e conside r ab l y le ss than the c apital and opera ting c osts t h e Di s trict incurs to handl e their wastewater . Reason- able us e fi gures a re established for peak flow r ate , annual flow and annua l suspended solids . ~rticle 3 -Permits . Two types of permits a r e estab lished . A Connection Permit i s r e quired for connecting to and u sing of n ew conne ctions to Di strict facilities (not t o those of. local agencies ). This typ e o f permit i s already i ssu ed by the Districts. An Industrial Waste Dischar ge Permit will be r equired for all discha r ges o f industrial wa ste in the Distri.ct, r egardless o f wh e re located . · Article 4 -Qua l i t y Requirements. Se l f -exp l anatory . Hoi:.rever, t he adoption o f additional rules and regulations by r esolution i s provided fo r wh e n found nec essary . Article 5 -Qu ant ity R e~~r ements . The Dis trict i s empowered to limi t the quantity of' industrial waste d ischarges . It is intended that this pow e r wi ll be invoked on l y in c ases of n ew discharges , or increases in existing discharges , when t h ere i s a possibj_l i t;:r of ove rloading District facilities to the extent .t hat disposal of domestic se1mge wou l d b e endangered . Article 6 -Fees and Charges. (a) Connection Fee -To defray costs of inspection, etc., of connections to District 1 s facilities only. (b) Industrial Waste Permit Fee -To be charged annually to all industrial waste dischargers in the District, depending on quantity and quality of flow. Maximum is $250 per year. (c) Excess Capacity (Capital) Charges -To be paid by all new users (and existing users whose peak flows increase in the future) if their peak flow rates exceed 25,000 gallons per day per $100,000 of assessed valuation (Reasonable Use). No user discharging less than 25,000 gallons per day · will pay this charge, regardless of assessed valuation. The charge is $350 per 1,000 gallons per day of peak flow rate which exceeds Reasonable Use. (d) Use {O & M) Charges -To be paid by all users, new and existing, whose annual flows exce ed 10,000,000 gallons per $100,000 assessed valu- ation or whose total suspended solids exceed 15 dry tons per year per $100,000 assessed valuation (Reasonable Use). Th e use charge for flow above Reasonable Use will be the exact cost the District is currently incurring for operating and maintaining its treatment facilities (at present, $0.03 per l,ooo· gallons). The use charge for solids above Reasonable Use is $10 p e r dry ton. Article 7 -Refund of Excess Cap a c i ty Charges. Under certain circum- stances the District will refund such charges when a user substantially decreases his peak flow or ceases operations entirely. Article 8 -Local Agency Exemption. All local public agencies, Cities and the County of Orange are exempt from payment of excess capacity of use charges . However, Federal and State installations are not exempt from these charges , except when their peak flow rate is less than 25,000 gallons per day. Article ·9 -Measurements of Quantity and Quality. Reasonable options _a_r_e~p-r_o_v~i~d~e-d-::--f=o-r--t~h,__e_s_e~m-e_a_s_u_r~e-m_e_n~t~s~.'--~T=h~e-=--o-r~d~i~nance emphasizes cooperation between the user and the District in arriving at measurements and esti- mates. See also definition of 11 Peak Flow Rate" under Article 2 for a method of estimating this value. Article 10 -Inspections . Provides for the nece ssary field and lab oratory work to determine complianc e with the ordinance. Article 11 -SEecial Agreements. Provides for agreements for special cases which do not entirely fit the framework and intent of the ordinance and for new users expected to pay excess capacity charges but whose peak flow rate and assessed valuation are of course not known at commenc eme n t of use. An example of a special situation would be a user who c an , and · agrees to, discha r ge his waste at off-peak hours. In such a case, the Board of Directors could authorize an agreement calling for a lower excess capacity charge. · Articles 12 throug h 20 -j\.EJ?.ea~_and Legal Provisions. Th ese articles are self-explanatory and as are recommended by the District's Legal Counsel. -2- , .;:t 7 March 19, 1 970 Background and Theory .of Charges and Fees Establi shed b Prop osed Uniform Connection and Use Ordina nc e March 10, 1970 Revision) 1. Background. The original ordinance (brought before the Boards last summer) proved , after a series of meetings with industrial representa- tives and a special committee of the Orange County Chamber of Commerce , to be unacceptable to industry . A new approach to the question of charges , similar to that contemplated by the Los Ange l es _county Sani ta ti on Districts, wa s then proposed to the Chamber Committee on which ·were represented two of the major indust ria l waste dischargers in the Covnty, Kimber ly-Clarke Corp ., and Hunt - Wesson Foods , Inc. Th e staff feels that industry in general now agrees with the purpose of the ordinance, that is, that the Districts must hav e control of the quality and quantity of d i scharge s to the sewer and that users who discharge more than their share of wastevmter (as judg ed b y taxes paid to the District) should pay charges for such excess use . The Chamber has also generally approved i n writing the ordinance in its present form .. A public h earing on the new ordinance is scheduled for the Apri l 8 meeting and it is hoped that a vote on adoption of the ordinance will t ake place after the hearing . 2 . Basic Di f ference Between Orig inal and New Ordina n ce (a) Credit Ag ainst Ch a r ge s . The orig inal a p proach wa.s to a llow a cre dit a g ainst s ei.·re r use cha r ge b ased on the l and a r ea occup ied by the industrial wa ste discha r ge r . Th e staff wa s always l u kewa r m to this approa ch and it prove d to be e ntirely unaccepta ble to indust ry . The n ew ordina nce provides tha t such credit will b e on the b asis of the ass e ss e d valua tion of the property of the discha r ge r using the sewer . (See I tem 3 below) (b) Excess Capacity Connection Charg es . The orig ina l ordina nce did not provide a conne c.tion cha r g e for excess capa city (cap ita l charge). Recovery of c a pital cost was orig ina lly b a sed on a hig her u se charge for volume and suspended sol ids . The n e w ordina nce provide s such a capital cha r g e (see below for method of computa tion) which is applicable only to new di s cha r g e rs or when a n exi s tin g discha r g er incre as e s the vol ume o f wa t e r d i scha r g e d o ve r t hat of 19 7 0 . (c ) Us e Ch a r ge s . Th e norma l us e charge has b een r e duc e d from $0 .0 5 per 1,000 ga llons to the actual tre a tmen t co s t (at pre s ent approxima t e ly $Oo0 3 p e r 1,000 gallons ) since the c ap ita l cos t will b e recovere d s e p a r ate ly, as e xp l a ine d ab ove . (d) Ap plicab ility . The Ch ambe r Committee was opposed to the emphasi s on indus trial was t e in the orig inal ordina nc e . The sta f f a g r ee s with this vi e w and h e n ce the n e w ordinanc e makes cha r g e s applic a b l e to all discha r ges , wh e the r of sewage or i n du s trial wa ste . Tax exempt dischargers are now· liable for charges since their assessed valuation credit (see 2(a)) will be zero. However 2 Cities, special districts and the County of Orange will be exempt from all.charges. It should be pointed out that most small businesses and ·industries, residential buildings, etc., will not pay excess capacity charges since the ordinance exempts all discharges under 25,000 gallons per day. In addition, it is expected that the assessed valuation of most apartment houses, larger businesses and industries will be suff:icient to preclude any capital or use charges. It should also be noted that both the above charges are applicable to all users of the District's system, whether connected directly to a District trunk or served by a sewer m·med by a City or local agency, which sewer drains to a District facility. 3. Theory of Amount of Charges and Credi ts. 'I'hese charges were computed from actual District's data. (a) The excess capacity char~ is derived from the recent John Carollo Engineers' study to establish similar charges for areas out- side the Districts (Riverside County and the Irvine Ranch Water District). It is comprised of tvw components: $232 per 1, 000 gallons per day peak flow for plant capacity, plus $118 for trunk sewer capacity, for a total of $350 per 1,000.gallons per day of peak flo}! rate. (b) The excess us~ char~ is the actual cost of treating the wastewater at the plants as determined annually and charged to the individual Districts. This is now approximately $0.03 per 1,000 gallons. An additional charge of $10 per ton of excess solids is also established, which is the cost of handling solids at the plants. (c) The credit ~gainst tpese charges for assessed valuation of 25,000 gallons per day of peal\. flow rate per $100,000 assessed valua- tion was computed from the actual peak flow rate reaching the plants and the current total assessed valuation of' the Districts. The credit for use of 10,000,000 gallons per year of total flow and 15 tons per year of solids per $100, 000 assessed valuation were simj_larly derived. These all011J"able flows and solids per ~~100, 000 assessed valuation are called "Reasonable Us.e" in the ordinance. Only dischargers exceeding reasonable use will j_ncur charges. -- 4. Fees. In addition to the above charges,. the ordinance also esta- blishes two types of fees designed to recover the District's inspection costs. (a) An annual industrial waste permit fee will provide funds for field inspections and labo~atory analysis of industrial wastes. The amount will be established by resolut:ion of the Board but cannot exceed $250 per year. (b) will be process will be sewers. A one time connection fee_, also established by resolution, charged to cover. costs of office and f1e1d vwrk necessary to and inspect applicatj_ons to connect to District trunk.so It applicable to connections to our facilJties, not to local Such a fee is already collected under exj_sting ordinances. -2- .. , STATE Of CALI FOR N IA-HI E RESOURC ES AGENCY RO NALD REAGAN, G overnor STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD r-'>M 1140, RESO URC ES BU ILDING -. Ph ono 4 45-3 993 NI NTH STREET • SACRNll EN TO 958 14 kERRY W . MULLI GAN, C hoirmon f. f. OI BB lC, Vice Chairman •. March 9, 1970 N. ·8. HUME, M ember RONALD B. ROB I E, Member W. W. ADAM S, 11.rmber JEROME B. GILBER T, Ex ecu livo O fficer NOTICE OF PUB LIC HEARING TO CONSIDER .AME NDI NG THE EXIS TI NG WATER QUALITY CONTRO L POLICIES FO R CALIFORNIA 1 S ·COA STAL AND INTERS'l'AT E \·7 ATERS . In acce pting California's wate ·r q u ality con trol policie s as wa ter quality sta nda rd's the S e cretary of the Interio r r ecomme nded. t he adop tion of numerical obj e ctives for con trol of b a c ter i o l og ica l q~ality o f ocea n, b a y, a n d tid a l p rism wate r s t hat r ece ive c asua l hu ~a n con t a ct r~sulting from b oating , fishing , etc. Th e Depa r tment of Public Health recomme n d s th e foll owi ng obj e cti v es : 1. The wa ters sha ll b e fre e of visible ev i d e n ce of s e wage materials; and 2. The bacteriologic a l qua lity will b e s u ch tha t d u ri ng any period of study, the med i a n most proba.ble n umber (MPN ) of coliform orga n isms pe r 100 millili ters d e t ermi n ed from the s a mpl es colle c ted a n d a n a l yzed s h a ll n ot e x ceed 5 4 0 . ·Furthe r, n o sing l e samp l e , wh e n ve r ifie d by a r epea t samp le t a ken wi thin 4 8 h ours , shall e xceed 10,0 00 per 100 milliliters . The MPN 's are to be de t ermined b y th e multiple t u b e fe r mentation me th od c..s d escribed in the latest edi tion of "S tan dard Meth ods for t he Examination of Wa ter ari~ Was t e Water ", us i ng a t l east t hree portions per d e cima l dilution . Th e Sta t e Boa rd will hold a h earing in Room 11-3 1, Resourc es Buildi n g 1416 Ninth S t r ee t Sacrame n to , Ca li f o r n i a.· io a.m., Th ursday , May 7, 1 9 7 0 to ·con s i der a d op ti ng these r ecommended obj e ct ives fo r a ll marine wa t ers support ing the above u ses . All p ersons wish ing t o m aJ~e statemen ts a t the h ear i ng are s t 1:-ong l y u rged t o s ub mi t the ir comments. in wri t i n g b y Apr il 17, 1 9 7 0 , to t he. Divis i o n of Wate r Qua l i t y , St ate i'Vater Resources Contro l Board, 1416 N ~n th S t r ee t , Room 1 50 , Sacra.mento , Ca l i f orn i a 9501'1 . -·